REGISTERED NO. D.L.-33001/99 The Gazette of India
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 6] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2001/MAGHA 21, 1922
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a
separate compilation.
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (iii)
Orders and Notifications Issued by Central Authorities (other than the Administrations of Union Territories)
(53)
258 GI/200154 THH GAZETTE OF INDfA : FEBRUARY 10, 2001/MAGHA 21, 1922 [FART II—SEC. 3(iii)] 55
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
ORDER
New Delhi, the 8th January, 2001
O.N. 28.—Whereas, the Election Commission is satisfied that the contesting candidates specified in column (3) of the Table below of the General Election to the Andhara Pradesh Legislative Assembly, 1999, held from the Constituency specified in column (2) against his/her name has failed to lodge an account of his/her election expenses as shown in column (4) of the said Table, as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Rules made thereunder :—
And whereas, the said candidates have not furnished any reason or explanation for the said failure even after due notice and the Election Commission is satisfied that he/she has no good reason or justification for the said failure;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of Section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the persons specified in column (3) of the Table below to be disqualified for being chcen as and for bsing, a member of either House of the Parliament or the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of States for a period of 3 years from the date of this order.
TABLE
Name of the Contesting Candidates
Reason for disqualification No. & Name of the Assembly Constituency
SI. No
2
4 1
3
7-Kothuru (ST)
1.
Failed to lodge the account of election expenses at all.
Kurangi Mokhalingamu S/o Tellayya,' Gadidapaye Village, Killada post, Seethampeta Mandal.
-do-
2.
-do-
Biddika Kanchayya Naydu . S/o Chiranjeevlu (Late) Pedarama Village, Seethampeta M andal.
ll 3-MartUr
3.
-du-
Shri Anjaneyulu Jandrajupalli 4-150, Vijayanagar Colony, Martur.
-do-
4.
-do-
Shri Atla Bala Sankara Reddy, Santhamagulur Post & Mandal.
-do-
5.
-do-
Shri Atla Bali Reddy, Santhamagulur Post & Mandal.
-do-
6.
-do-
Shri Ravipudi Vcnkata—KrisJinatao, Mar-tur Post, Martur Mandal.
114-Addanki
7.
-do-
Shri Komrauri Vijaya Kumar S/o Jcevaratnam, Edumudi, Naguluppal apadu Mandalam.
-do-
8.
-do-
Kommitri Kanakarao Edumudi Naguhippalapadu Mandalairt.
120-Cumbum
9.
-d-v
Perumatcddy Nageswara Reddy H.No. 5-10, Ravipadu Village, Cumbum Mandai, Prakasam District,56 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 10, 2001/MAGHA 21, 1922 [PART II—SEC. 3(iii)] 1 3 4 2 120-Cumbum 10.
Failed iv loogv Sht account of elccii^n expenses af all.
Shri Nulaka Balasubba Reddy, Nagulavaravn Post, Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasara DistricL
-do-
11. -do-
Shri Shaik Abdul, Mittameedipalli Village, H/o Pedakandukur, Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District
[No. 76/AP-LA/99]
By Order,
BABD RAM, Secy.
57 58 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 10, 2001/MACHA 21, 1922 [PART II—SEC. 3(iii)]ORDER
Mew Delhi, the 8th January, 2001
O.N 29 .—Whereas, the Election Commission of India is satisfied that each of the contesting candidate specified in column 4 of the Table below at the General Election to the Legislative Assembly in Rajasthan State specified in column 2 and held from the Constituency specified in column 3 against his/her name has failed to lodge the account of his/her election expenses as shown in column 5 of the said Table as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidates have either not furnished any reason or explanation for the said failure even after due notice by the Election Commission or, after considering the representation made by them, if any, the Elec- tion Commission is satisfied that they have no good reason or justification for the said failure;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of Section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the persons specified in column 4 of the Table below, to be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of cither House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a Stale or Union Territory for a period of three years from the date of this order.
TABLE
Particular of election
Reason for disqualifi- cation
SI. No
Name and Address of the Candidate
No, and Name of Assembly Consti- tuency
5
4
3 .
2
1
1.
153-Bhilwara
General Election to Legis- lative Assembly, 1998
Accounts not lodged in the manner re- quired by law.
Shri Panna Lai Near Bus Stand Post Pur, Bhilwara Rajasthan
Accounts not lodged
28-Jhunjhunu
-do-
2.
Laxman Kumar Sharma Mohalla Narsiugh pura Post Patsari Distt. Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan
-do-
68-Kaman
-do-
3-
Islam
Village Ghosinga
Teh. Pahadi
Rajasthan
59 3 4 2 ! i 5 Accounts not lodged68-Kaman General Election to Legis- lative Assembly, 1998
5.
Snmsuddin Village Khedali Manna Post Umaka Teh. Pahadi Dharatpur Rajasthan
7-Kesrisinghpur (SC)
General Election to Legis- lative Assembly, 1998
: 6.
196-Makrana General Election to Legis- lative Assembly, 1998
7,
75-Weir General Election to Legis- lative Assembly, 1998
8.
18-Ratangarh General Election to Legis- lative Assembly, 1998
. General Election to Legis-
9.
118-Jhaloopatan lative Assembly, 1998
10 . General Election to Legis- 114-Chabra lative Assembly, 1998
. General Election to Legis- 64-Thanagazi 11
lative Assembly, 1998
. General Election to Legis-
Accounts not lodged Het Ram, Chak 4 C Chhoti Post Office 3C Chhoti Teh. Ganganagar Rajasthan
Accounts not lodged in the manner re- quired by law.
Accounts not lodged
Accounts not lodged Damodar 63, Banshiji Ka Bcra Post Borawad Teh. Makrana Rajasthan Rewati Prasad Koli Khirki Darwaja Weir, Rajasthan Madan Singh (Loonch) Vill. & Post Loonch, Teh. Ratangarh Distt. Chum Rajasthan 331022
Accounts not lodged in the manner required by law.
Surajmal Indraprastha Colony B Sector Ramganjmandi Distt. Kota, Rajasthan.
Accounts not lodged in the manner required by law.
Abrar Ahmed Behind Police Station Chhabra, Chabra (Baran) Rajasthan
Accounts no l lodged in the manner required by law.
9-Raisingnagar (SC)
12
lative Atsembly, 1998
. General Election to Legis-
13
lative Assembly, 1998
Accounts not lodged Narayan Singh Village Khandera Post Kumha Distt. Bharat Pur Rajasthan Mukhtiar Singh Ward No." 11 Raisingnagar Rajasthan.
Accounts not lodged Gyan Singh Dabla, Teh. Raisinghnagar Rajasthan.
[No. 76/RJ/2OO1/W.S.-1]
By Order,
C. R. BRAHMAM. Secy.
60 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 10, 2001/MAGHA 21, 1922 [PART II—Spc. 3(iii)]New Delhi, the 31st January, 2001 O.N. 30.—In putsuanco of Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), tbe Election Commission of India hereby publishes the order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 22-12-2000 in Election Petition No. 1 of 1992 (S. Ramachandran alias Panruti Ramachandran Vs. Mrs. Jayanthi Nataraian and ' 71 (H others).
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
MADRAS
(Original Jurisdiction)
Friday, the Twenty Second day of December, Two
Thousand
CORAM
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MALAI SUBRA- MANIAN
Election Petition No. 1 of 1992
R. Ramachandran @ Panruti Ramachandran S|o. A. Sankara Thevar M. 10, 19th Avenue
Ashok Nagar, Madras 600 083. —Petitioner
Versus
1. Jayanthi Natarajan 2. G. Swominathan
3. V. Rajan Sellappa 4. S. Mulhumani 5. S, Austin 6. N. Thangeraj 7. R. Damodharan 8. The Returning Officer
for the biennial election, June 1992 to the Council of States by the members of Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly and Secretary, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, Legislative Assembly Secretariat Madras 600 009. —E Respondents Petition praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased
(a) to declare the election of Mrs. Jayanthi Natarajan, the first respondent herein as member of Rajya Sabha from the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly on 18-6-92 to be void; and
(b) to award Costs of this petition.
The above petition coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence or Mr, A. C. Kumaracurubaran, Counsel for the petitioner and Respondents 1 to 8 not appearing in person or through Advocate and upon perusing the petition filed herein, this Coutt made the following ORDER :
In view of expiry of terms of the office, the peti- tion became infructuous. Hence this petition is dismissed accordingly.
Witness, the Hon'ble Thiru Justice Nagcndra Kumar Jain, Chief Justice at Madras aforesaid, this the twenty second day of December Two thousand.
Sd|-
K. KARUPPIAH,
Asstt. Registrar Original Side-II.
Certified to be a true copy|
Dated at Madras this the 4th day of January, 2001.
[No. 82|CS-TN|1|S>2|94] P3PIT f ' By Order, SHARAN PAL SINGH, Secy.
Printed by thi Manager, Govt. of India. Press, Rinji Road, New Delhl-110064 nnd Published by the Control!^ of Publications, Delhi-] 10054, 2001