This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

[No. 2:'8/48/2001-AVD-U-(iii)]

HARI SINGH, Under Secy.

New Delhi, the 2nd. August, 2001 S.O. 2048.— In xercise of the powers conferred by SUb-section (I) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 161 PCR 99 dated 17-7-1999, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the mem- bers of the Delhi Special Police Esiablishmtnt to the whole of the State of Kamataka for investigation of offences punishable under section 120B read with 409, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 477A of the Tndian Penal Code, 1860 and section 13(2) read with 13(l)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988) and attempts, abe

[No. 228/48/2001-A VD-IJ(iv)]

HARI SINGH, Under Secy.

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001 S.O. 2049.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (I) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the con- sent of the SLate Government of Rajasthan Home (Group-V) Dopirtmcnt vide Notification No. F.I3 (63) Honvi-V/95 dated 22nd June, 2001, hereby ex- tends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment io the whole cf the State of Rajasthan for investigation of offences under sections 489A, 489B, 489C of the Indian Peral Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) of FIR No. 195/2001 regis- tered at Police Station Bagru District Jaipur Rural and attempts abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offence mentioned above and any other offence and ollcices committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[No. 2?8/42/200I-AVD41] HARI STNGH, Undrr Secy.

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001 S O. r050.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946

[No. 228/49/2001-AVD-IIG)]

HARI SINGH, Under Secy.

New Delhi, Jhe 3rd August, 2001 S.O. 2051 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 167 PCR 99 dated 12-8-1999, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the Stite of Karnataka for investi- gation of offences punishable udder section 120B read with 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, I860 and section 13(2) read with 13(1) (d) oi¹ the Pre- vention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988^ and attempts, abetment!) and consipiracy in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offence mentioned above and any other offence and offerrees committed in the course of the same transaction or ariiing out of thz same facts against (1) Sri G M. Maha- devappa, Par ner, M/s National Granfest Exporters, Bangalore (Pvt. person(2) Sri G. Eranna Setty, Par'.- ner M/s Natural granites Exporters Bangalore (Pvt. person) (3) Sri G. Sub ramanyam, Officer, S.M. IV (under suspension).

[No. 228/49/2001-AVD-U(")]

HARI SINGH, Under Secy.

New Delhi, t h: 3rd August, 2001 S,O. 205 \ - - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No HD 202 PCR 99 dated 4-9-1999, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the mem- bers of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offences punishable under section 120R read with 167 of the Tnriian Penal Code, I860 and section 13(2) read with 13(l)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption AH, 1988 ( \ :i Na 49 of 1988) and attempts, abet- ments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with one or rrore of the offence mentioned above and any other offence add offences. commiUed in the couisc of the same transaction or arKing out of the same facts, against (I) Sri v.P Shamsuddin, former Commissioner of Income Tax (Appcals)-If (Retd.) Income Tax Department C.R .Buildings, Queens Road. Bangalore (2) Sri L. Sohan Raj. No. 34 Mani.il Pet, Bangalore (3) Sri Nemichand, No. 34 Manul Pel, Bangalore (Pvt. person (4) Sr i Bharatrdj No. 34, Pet, Manul Binilore (Pvt. person) and (5) Sri S. Venkatcsan, C.A. No. S.S.S. Phza, 32, It Floor Kumara Krupa Road, Bmsuilnre (Pvt. person).

[No. 228/49/200l-AV!>[[(iii)]

HARI STNGH, Unclei Secy.

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O, 2053. -In exeicise of the poweis conferred by stib- S'.-ction (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), (he Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No, HI) 202 PCR 99 doted 7-9-1999, hereby extends the powers and jur^did on of Ihc members of the Delhi Special Police bstablisbnicnl to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of oflenees punishable under section 120B read with 167 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and section 13(2) read with i.MKd) of the Pievention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988.^ and attempts, abetments and conspiracy in lelalion to ( r in connection with one or more of the offence mentioned above and any other oltencc and offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts, against (1) Sri V. P. Shamsuddin, Former Com- missioner of Income-tax, Bangalore (2) Sri Jose Alexander, Indirnnagr'r, Bangalore (Pvt. person) (3) Sri Tohnson Alexander, lnrliran.icar, liaiij-alore (Pvt. person) (4) Sri S. Venkatesaa, Knmaraki upi Road, HaneaJore (Pvt. person) (5) Sri K. R Pradeep, Tdenpink Vittal Mallya Road, Bangalore (P"t p:rson)

[No. 228/49/2001-AVD-TIdVl

HARI SINGH, Under Sccv4145 New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001 New Delhi the 3rd August, 2001

S.O, 2055,—In cxeicise of the powers conferred by sub- section (I) of section 5 redd with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police 1-stablishment Acl, 1946 (Act No 25 of I"46), the Central Government wilh the consent ol the Stale Government of Karnataku VK!.' Notification No, Jin 224 PCR <•)•) dated 12-1(>-19'J9, hereby extends the powers and juiisd'c ion ol thr* members of the Delhi Special Police r^nblishrncnt In the whole of the State of Karnataka for inveitipiilion o[. offences pumsl-^ble undei section 13(2) read wilh '3(1 Me) oi the Prevention of Couuplion Act, 1983 (Acf No. 4^ ,,f iQRjn and section 409 of the Indian Penal Tode, I860, nriti attimpts, abetments and conspiracy in re- lation to or in connection with one or more of the offence mentioned above and any othei offence and offences commit- ted in the ciHii'-,e of the s.-rnc transaction or arising out of the same fads, against Sri V Pcddanna S/o Y Gansanna, Tunior Clt-iir. Offict- of the Senior Medical Superintendent, Railway Hospital, Hubli.

(No. 228/49/2001-AVD-TI(vi)1 IIARI SINGH, Under Secy.

S.O. 2054—Tn exercise of the powers conferred by sub- si-cMoii (I) of notion 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi SpLcial Police Establishment Acl, 19-16 (Act Nil 25 OL 19461, the Central Government with the consent of 'he St ite Government of Karnatakj vide Notification No HD 203 PCR 99 dated 4-9-1999, hereby extends the powers and nil Kd cticn of the members of the Delhi Special Poliro Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataku fin investigation of offencrs punishable under section 468, 471 and 420 read with 511 of the Indian Penal Code, I860 and section 13(2) lead with 13(l)(d) of the Prevention of Conun- lion Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1QRS) and attempts, ahetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offence mentioned above and any other offence and offences committed in the couise of the spmc transaction or nn\ing oi.il of tlu same facts against Sri M. Shantha Kumar S'o MiwKwnmy. Junior Office Assistant, Coimbatoie Ail Po-f 'lani'I Nadu.

I No. 228^19/2001-A VD-TT(V>1

HARI SINGH, Under Secy.

New Delhi, the 6th August 2001

S.O. 2056.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 rood with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), thy Central Government with the con- sent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD|48 PCR 2001, dated 26th March 2001, hereby extends the powers41'*S THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART TT—SEC. 3(ii)] MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

ChNTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXFS

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001 and' jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the who.le of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offences punishable under section 7 of the Pre- vention of Corruption Act, 1988, and attem- pts, abetments and conspiracy in relation thereto and anv other offence and offences committed hr the course of the same tran- saGticwi or arising out of the same facts against Shri A. K. Jain, Garrison Engineer. Air Force, Bidar and any other public ser- vant's- or persons, regis-tered with DSPE CRT'ACB [Bangalore vide RC. 10(1)'200J- BLR.

(No. 228|44|2001-AVT)-n] HART SINGH, Under Secy.

S.O. 2057—It is r.otificd tor general information that enterprise/industrial undertaking, listed at para (3) below has been approved hy the Central Government for the purpose oi section 10(230) of the Income-tax Ael, 1961, read with rule 2E of Ihe Income-tax Rules, 1962, for the assessment years 20( I -2002, 2002-2003 and 2003-2004.

2 The approval is subject to the condition that—

fi) the enterprise/industrial undertaking will conform to and comply with the provisions of section 10(23G) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with rule 2E of the [ncome-tdx Rules, 1962;

(ii) the Central Government shall withdraw this approval

if the enterprise/industrial undertaking :—

(a) ceases to carry on infrastructure facility; or

(b) fails to maintain books of account and jiet such accounts audited by an accountant as lequired fcy sub-rule (7) of I ulc 2H of the Income-tax Rules, 1962; or

(c) fails to furnish the audit report as required by sub-rule (7) of rule 2E of the Income-fa* Rules, 1962,

3. The entcrpj ise/industrial undertaking approved is—

250 MW Licnite Based Power project at Ncvvrli. Tamil Nadu by ST-CMS Electric Company Pvt. Ltd.. Uthangal VilJaffe, U Mangalam Village, Via Virudnchainm TnluK Cuddalore District-607804 (F. No. 2O5[3R|2OO1-ITA-I1)

^Notification No. 216|2001|F No 2O5|38|2OOMTA-H1

PANKAI KUMAR, Under Secy.

ORDER

New Delhi, the 31st July, 2001

STAMPS

S.O. 2058.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (B) of Sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899), ihe Central Government hereby permits Punjab and Sind Bank, New Delhi to pay consolidated stamp duty of rupees sixty lakh only on bonds described as 11.6 per cent Unsecured Subordinated Redeemable Bonds (Series-Ill) of rupees one lakh each in the nature of promissory notes aggregating to rupees sixty crore only allotted on 09-02-2001 by the said Bank.

(No. 3012001-STAMPS|F. No. 33|41

2001-STJ R. G. CHHABRA, Under Secy.

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS Nagpur, the 1-st August, 2001

No. 2|2001

S.O. 2059.—Shri B.RS. Rao, Deputy Commissioner, Group 'A' Central Excise & Customs, Nagpur Commissioncrate, having attained the age of superannuation, retired from Government Service in the afternoon of 31-7-2001.

{C. No. 11(7)4197.Et.I|18480J RA7IVA KUMAR, Add. Commissioner (P&V) (Department of Economic Affairs)

(Banking Division,)

New Delhi, the 31st July, 2001

S.O. 2060.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) of Section 6 at the Industrial Development Bank, of India Act, 1964 (18 of 1964), the Cent raj Government, on the recommendation of Board of Directors of Industrial Development Bank of India hereby appoints Shri S. K. Kapur, presently Executive Direc- tor. Industrial Development Bank of India HK a whole time director (designated as Deputy Managing Director) Industrial Development Bank of India, for the period from the date of his taking charge and upto 31st October, 200-1.

IF. No. 7/-*0/200O,B,Q, V(ii)l RAMESH CHAND, Under Secy.

New Delhi, the 2nd August, 2001 S.O. 2061.-—In exercise of he powers conferred by clause (e) of Sub-section 3 of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisi- tion and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with Sub-clause (2) of Clause 9 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby nominates4148 THE GAZETTE OF INDTA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PAET II—SEC. 3(ii)] Shri Rameshchandra Trivcdi, Special Assis- tant, Bank of Baroda, Y-Block, Kidwai Na^ir, Kanpur City (UP) as a Director on the Board of Directors of Bank of Baroda with effect from 2-8-2001 to 31-12-2003 i.e. the date on which he retires from the services of the bank or until he ceases to be an employee of Bark of Baroda, whichever is earlier.

{F. No. 15|l!2001-fR]

G. R. SUMMAN, Dy. Secy.

New Delhi, the 6th August, 2001

S.O. 2062.—In pursuance of clause (ca) of Sub-section (1) of Section 25 read with Sub-section (2A) of Section 26 of the State Bank of Tndia (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 (38 of 1959), the Central Government here- by appoints Shri C. Gopinath Nair, Special Assistant, State Bank of Travancore, Head Office, Thiruvananthapuram as a director on the Board of Director of Stale Bank of Tra- vancore for a period of fhrcc years with effect from 6th August, 2001 to 5th August, 2004 and thereafter until his successor is ap- pointed or three years more whichever is earlier, or till he ceases to be a workman em- ployee of Slate Bank of Travancore, which- ever event occurs the earliest.

[F. No. 151S12000 [R]

G. R. SUMMAN, Dy. Secy.

to as coulmn (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :

(3)

(2)

M. D. (Rivdiolojy)

"Doctor of Medicine (Radiology)

Doctor of Medicine (Radio-Diagnosis)

M. D. (Radio-Diag.) (These qualifieruc rs shall be recognised medical qualification¹* when granted in or after 1971),

D.M.R.D.

Diploma in. Medical Radio Diagnosis

(This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1967).

Doctor of Medicine (Radio-Therapy)

M. D. (Radio-Therapy) (This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1972).

Diploma in Medical (Rodio Therapy)

D.M.R.T. (This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification when grunted in or after March, 1967),";

MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMTLY WELFARE

(Department of Heeilh)

(b) against the Kuvempu University, Karna- taka, in column (2), after the entry "Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)" and the entiy relating thereto in column (3), the following shall hi New Delhi, the 2nd August, 2001

inserted, namely : —

(3)

(2)

"Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology)

S. O. 2063 .—In exercise of the powers conferred by subjection (2) of :he section II of the Indian Medical Council Aci, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consultation with the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule Lo tl.e said Act, nrmely :—

In the said First Schedule :- -

M.D. (Microbiology) (This qualification shall bs a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after January, 1992)";

(a) against the Bangalore Univeisity under the heading "Recognised Medical Qualification" [hereinafter referred to as column (2)]. after

(c) against the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Science⁰, Karmitaka, in column (2), afte I the entry • Mas'cr of Surgery (Anatomy)" and4151 the ( ntry - r k v rg Ilien.-to in crlumn (3). I he following sh^ll b""¹ inserted pvmr-ly :- - (2)

(3)

D.P.M.

"Diploma in Psychologi- cal Medicine

Dip. in Avi. Med.

Diploma in Aviation Medicine

D.O.

Diploma in Ophthalmo- logy

D.O.M.S.

Diploma in Ophthalmic Medicine & Surgery

D F.M.

Diploma in Forersic Medicine

D i p. iii Bfc<.

Diploma in Bpcterirlopy

Diploma in Dermatoloey D.D

DM.R.D.

Diploma '"n Medical Radio Diaeresis

Diploma in Public Hcaltr i D P P.

D.T.C.D.

Diploma in Tuberculous and Chest Disef"=es

D.V.D.

D.M.R.T.

(2)

(3)

MD (Obst. & Gynae.)

MS (Orthopaedics)

MD (Crmm. Med.) Doctor of Mrtiicirc (Ob

MD (Pharmacology)

MD (Microb'ology)

MD (Pathology)

MD (Paediatires) (Phannncology) Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology) Doctor of Medicine (Pathology) Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)

MD (Radio-Diag.)

MD (Skin, STD& Lep.)

MD(Derm. & Vcn.)

MD(Skin & VD)

MD (Radio-therapy)

(MD Radiology)

MD (Psychiatry) MD (GCT. Med.)4152 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 41& J435 GT'2001—34j'54 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PAUT II—SEC. -3(ii)] 4155 4156 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PA*T fl—SEC. 3(k)] 4"7

New Delhi, the 3rd August 2001

S.O. 2064.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medjct I Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India heielv makes the following farther amendments in the First Scheditftt to the saftj Act, namely:—

In the First Schedule to the sajd Act, -

(a) against the "Annamalai University", under the headiag 'Recognised Medical Qualification' [hereinafter referred to in column' U)] after the entry 'Bach.-lor of Medicine and bachelor of Surgery' and the entry relating4158 THE GAZkTTfe OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2Q01/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART It—Sjjc. 3{iiO] thereto under-the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to in column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

"Master of Surgery (EN.T.) Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology) Doctor of Mcdicin<;(Obs\ & Gynac) Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesia)

Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine) Doctor of Medicine (Pathology) Doctor of Medicine (Community Medicine) Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics) Master of Surgery (General Surgery)

M.S. ( E N . X) M.S. (Ophthalmology) M.D. (Obst & Gynae) M.D. (Anaesthesia) (The above qualifications shall be recognised medical qualification¹¹ when granted on or after July, 2000, in respect of Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalainagar); M.D. (Genl Mcd) M.D. (Pathology) M.D, (Community Medicine) M.D. (Paediatrics) M.S. (Genl. Surg.) (The above qualifications shall be recognised medical qualifications when granted on or after August, 2000, in respect of Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalainagar);

Doctor of Medicine (Biochemistry)

M.D. (Biochemistry) (This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification wheh granted on or after October, 2000, in respect of Rajah Muthiah Medical College. AnnamalainaearV:

(b) against the "M.S. University of Baroda" , in column (2) after the entry 'Diploma in Public Health' and the entry relating thereto in column (3), the following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

• (3)

"Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)

M.D. (Psychiatry) (This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted on or after 1981, in respect of Medical College, Baroda)":

(c) under the heading "University or Modical Institution" [hereinafter refemd to in column (1)] after "B.N Chakravarty University, Kurukshetra" and the entries relating thereto in columns (2) and (3), the following shall be respectively inserted, namely:—

(3)

(2)

(1)

M.B.B.S.

"B.N. Mandal University, Bihar Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery

(This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after March, 2001 in respect of Katihar Medical College, Katihar)";

(d) after "Chaudhary Charan Singh University" and the entries relating thereto in columns (2) and (3), the following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3) (1)

M.B.B.S.

"Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University, Kanpur

D A. D.O.M.S. D.M.R.E.

Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery Diploma in Anaesthesiology Diploma in Ophthalmic Medicine Surgery Diploma in Medical Radiology

and Electrology

D. Ortho, D.G.O. D.C.H. D.T.C.D.

Diploma in Orthopaedics Diploma in Gynaecology and Obstetrics Qiploma in Child Health Diploma in Tuberculosis and Chest Disoases 415?

(2)

0)

0)

Diploma in Laryngology and Otology Diploma in Clinical Pathology Doctor of Medicine (Radiotheiapy) Magjstiai Chirurgiae

D.L.O D.C.P. M.D. (Radio-therapy) M.Ch. (CV.T.S.)

(Cardio-Vascular and Thoracic Suigeiy)

Doctor of Medioine (Medicine) Master of Surgeiy (Orthopaedics) Doctor of Medicine (Pathology) Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology) Doctor of Medicine (Physiology) Master of Surgery (E.N.T.) Master of Surgery

M.D. (Med.) M S. (Ortho.) M D. (Path.) M.D. (Ophth.) M.D. (Physio.) M.S. (E.N.T.) M.S. (Obst. & Gynac)

(Obstetrics and Gyanecology)

M.S. (Surg.) M.D. (Radiology) M.S. (Anat.) M.D. (Pharma.)

Master of Surgery (Surgery) Doctor of Medicine (Radiology) Master of Surgery (Anatomy) Doctor of Modicine (Pharmacology)

Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthes-'ojogy) Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics) Doctor of Medicine (Social and

M.D (Anaes ) M.D (Paed) M.D. (Soc. & Prcv Med.)

Preventive Medicine)

Doctor oi Medicine Tuberculosis and Chest D'scases)

Doctor of Modic'ne (Caidiology)

M.D. (Tuberculosis & Chest Diseases) D.M. (G-rJclcgy) (The above Qualifications shall be recognised medical qualifi- cations when granted on or after 25th July, 1997)", (e) against the "Manipnl Academy of Hjgher Education", in column (2), after the entry 'Doctor of Medicine (Commur'ty Medicine)' and the entry relating thereto in column (3), the following shall be inseiled, namely -

(3)

(2)

(Paediatric Surgery)

"Magistrar of Chrrurgue

M.Ch, (Paediatric Surgery) (This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted on or after March, 1997 in respect of Kastuiba Medical College, Manipal)" ;

(f) after "Magadh University' and the entries relating thereto in columns (2) and (3), the following shall be inserted, namely: —

(3) (1)

(•2)

"Mumbai University

Bachelor of Medicine and Bnchelor of Surgery M.B.B S. Diploma in Anaesthesia

DA

Diploma in Ophthalmology Diploma in Medical Radio Diagnos s Diploma in Radiation Medicine Diploma in Medical Radio Therapy Doctor of Medicine Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine) Master of Surgery Master of Surgery (General Surgery) Doctor of Medicine (Tuberculosis) Master of Science (Pathology) Doctor of Medicine (Midwifery)

D.O. D.M.R.D D.R.M. D.M.R.T M.D. M.D (General M d.) M.S. M.S. (Gen. Surg.) M.D. (Tuberculosis) M.Sc. (Path.) M.D. (Mid.)4M0" THE GAZETTE 6F BS?$JA : WQffl* *** 20&MWAVANA 57, 1*23 [PAR".*MJ";. J#AJ (1)

Master of Surgery (Oto-Rhino-Laryngqlogy) M.S. (Oto-Rhino Laryngology)

M.S. (Ophthalmology) M.D. (Paediatrics) M.D. (Pathology) M.S. (Ortho.)

M.D. (Pharmacology)

M.D. (Neurology) M.S. (Paed. Surg.) M.D. (Microbiology) M.D. (Anaes.) M.D. (Soc. & Prev. Med.) Master of Surgery (Ophi^lmolqgy) Doctor of Medjcjpe (Paediatrics) Doctor of Medicine (jPathplogy) Master of Surgery (Orthopaedic^) Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology) Doctor of Medicjrje (Neurology) Master of Surgery (Paediatrjc Surgery) Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology) Doctor of Medicine (Anapsthpsjo,logy) Doctor of Medipjne (Social and Preventive Me^icjnc) Master of Surgery (Anatomy) Master of S,w?gery (Pla&tic Surgpry) Master of Surgery (Plastic Surgery) Master of Surgery (Thoracic Surgery) Master of Surgery (Thoracic Surgery) Doctor pf Medicine (Neurology) Master of Surgery

M.S. (Anat.) M.S. (PI. Surg.) M.Ch.(Pl. Surg.) M.S. (Thoracic Surg.) M.Ch. (Thoracic Surg.) M.M. (Neurology) M.Ch. (Pacd. Surg.)

M.D. (Path. & Bact.)

M.Ch. (Neuro-Surgery) M.D. (Radiotherapy) D.M. (Cardiology) M.D. (Obst. & Gynae.) (Paediatrjc Surgery) Doctor of Medicine (Pathplog v and Bacteriology) Master of Sujgery (Neuro-Surgery) Doctor of Medicine (Radiotherapy) Doctor of Medicine (Cardiology) Doctor of Medicine (Obsterics and Gynaecology)

(The above qualification shall be recognised medical qualifications when granted on or after 4#i September, 1996)";

(g) against the "Sambalpur University" in column (2), after the entry 'Doctor of Medicine (T.B. S$ Cfvwt Diseases)' and the entry relating thereto in column (3), the following shall be inserted, namely: —

(2)

(3)

" D r a or of Medicine (Radio-Djagnosis) M.D. (Ra,dio-D^ag.)

(This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1978, in respect of V.S.S. Medical College, Burla).";

(h) after "Shivaji University" and the entries relating thereto in columns (2) and (3) the following shall" be inserted, namely:—

(3)

(2)

(1)

M.B.B.S.

"Shri Shahuji Maharaj University, K anpur

D.A. D.O.M.S. D.M.R.E.

D.Othrho. D.G.O.

Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery Diploma in Anaesthesiology Diploma in Ophthalmic Medicine, Surgery Diplomti ii> Medical Radjojqgy and Electrojogy Diploma in Ontb^p^cdics Diploma in QyflMcolpgy and Obsterics4161 1 2 3 D.C.H. D.T.C.D.

D.L.O. D.C.P.

M.D. (Radio-therapy) M.Ch. (CVTS)

M.D. (Med.) M.S. (Ortho.) M.D. (Path.) M.D. (Ophth.) M.D. (Physio.) M.S. (E.N.T.)

M.S. (Obst. & Oynae.)

M.S. (Surg.) M.D. (Radiology) M.S. (Anat.) M.D. (Pharma.)

M.D. (Anaes.) M.D. (Paed.) M.D. (Soc. A Prcv. Med.)

Diploma in Child Health Diploma in Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases Diploma in Laryngology and Octology Diploma in Clinical Pathology Doctor of Medicine (Radio-therapy) Magistrar Chirurgiae (Cardio-Vascular and Thoracic Surgery) Doctor of Medicine (Medicine) Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics) Doctor of Medicine (Pathology) Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology) Doctor of Medicine (Physiology) Master of Surgery (E.N.T.) Master of Surgery (Obstetrics and Gynaecology) Master of Surgery (Surgery) Doctor of Medicine (Radiology) Master of Surgery (Anatomy) Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology) Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesiology) Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics) Doctor of Medicine (Social and Preventive Medicine) Doctor of Medicine (Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases) Doctor of Medicine (Cardiology)

M.D. (Tuberculosis & Chest Diseases) D.M. (Cardiology) (The above qualifications shall be recognised medical quali- fications when granted from 24th September, 1995 to 24th July, 1997)"';

(i) against the "Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chcnnai", in column (2) , after the entry 'Diploma in Oto-Rhinolaringology' and the entry relating thereto in column (3), the following shall bo inserted, namely:—

(2)

13)

M.D. (Radio-Diag.) M.S. (Optholmology)

"Doctor of Medicine (Radio-Diagnosis) Master of Surgery (Opthalmology)

M.S. (E.N.T.)

Master of Surgery (E.N.T.)

(The above qualifications shall be recognised medical qualifications when gian^d on or after June, 2000, in respect of Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai.)

D.M. (Cardiology)

Doctor of Medicine (Cardiology)

(This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification When granted on or after July, 2000, in respect of Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai.)";

2435 GI/2001—44162 . 1HE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] (j) after "Sri Ramachancra Meriicsl College and Research Inz&ntr," 2nd the ii'trifj H a l ^s thr^'r JT> columns (2) and (3), the following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

(1)

M.B.B.S.

"Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University

Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery

(This qualification shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted on or after 3rd August, 1992, in respect of J.N. Medical College, Bhagalpur)"'.

INo. V.I 1015/5/20OJ-ME (Policy-I)]

P.G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING

New Delhi, the 2nd August, 2001

S.O. 2065.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (A) of Rule 10 of

the Ofllcinl Language (use for official purpose of the Union)

Rule, 1976, the Centra] Government hereby notify the follow-

ing Subordinate Offices of the D O: Doorddrshan (Ministry

oi Information and Broadcasting), the "taff whereof more

than 80 per cent have acquired the T/orkinj knowledge of

Hindi :—

1. Doordarshan Maintenance Centie. Sngan^nngar,

Rajaithan.

2 Doordarshan Maintenance Centre, JhunM

?. Doordarshan Maintenance Centre, Dariiling.

[No. E-11011/l '93-Hindil

S. S. KATARIA, Director (01 )4163

MINISTRY O^ COAL

New Delhi, the 7th August, 2001

S O 2066 -Whereas it appear* to the Cential Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 cf the Coal Bearing Areas (\cquisltion and Development) Act, J957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Govern- ment hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein.

The plan bearing number SLCL/BSP/GM(PLG)/LAND/25O, dated the 25th May, 2001 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the Office of tho Collector, Surguja (Chhattisgarh) or in the Office of the Coal Controller, 1, Counu] Houie Street, Caloulta-700 001 oi in the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Soction), Secpat Road, Bilaspui -495006 (Chhattisgarh)

All persons interested in the land covered b\ this notification shall deliver all maps, charts and other docu- ments referred to in sub-section (7) of section 13 of tho said Act to the Officor-m-Chaigc Head of the Department (Revenue), South Eastern Coalfields Limned, Scepat Road. Bilaspur-495006 (Chhattisgsrh), within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE : AMBA PROJECT

BHATGAON AREA

DISTRICT — SURGUJA (CHHATTISGARH)

Plan No. SECL/BSP/GM(Plg)/Land/250

Dated 25th May, 2001 (showing the land for prospecting)

(A) REVENUE LAND

Name of Village Village number

Tahsil District

Aiea in hectares Remarks Serial numtx or

^mbikapur (\mbikapui Kuihari Kisunpur

82 / 68

1. 2

Surguja Surguja

220.800 90.500

Part Part Mendara-Khurd 414

Ambikapur 3

Surguja

30.000

Part

TOTAL 341.300" hectares" (B) FOREST LAND

Namo of forest

Division Area in hectares

Remarks

Serial Numbci r

Reserved forest

South Surguja 1

214.500

Part

Total : 214.500 hectares

GRAND TOTAL (A+B) 555.800 Hectares (approximately) OR

1373.38 Acres (approximately)

Boundary Description

A-B

Line start from point 'A* in reserved forest and passes through reserved foreit, Kulhari village, then again through reserved forest and meets at point 'B'. Line passes through reserved forest, Kulhari village and Kisunpur village and meets at point 'D*.

Line passes through villages Kisunpur, Mendara Khurd then through reserved forest and meets at B-C-D D-A

the starting point 'A'.

fNo. 43015/10/2001/PRIW]

SANJAY BAHADUR, Dy. Secy.

MINISTRY OF P E T R O L ED AND NATURAL C*AS

Now Delhi, the 3rd August, 200].

S.O. 2067. —Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for. the transport of Natural Gm from SFCL to Soundaraja Cotton Mills gas pipeline project in the State of Pondicherry a pipeline should be laid b> the Gas Authority of India Limited;

And whereas, it n.ppc rs to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline it is ne- cossary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the iaid pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is des- cribed in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, thercforr, m exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and M i- nerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby de- clares its intention to acquire the right of usor therein.

Any person, interest in the laud described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazott-: of India arc made available to the general public, object in wr'tuig to the acquisition of right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Gas Authority of fndia-Limited 1^42, Ncola South Street. Nagapatiinain. Tamilnadu

SCHEDULE

District

fehsil

Town/Villa po

Aroa to be acquired

for Rou in Hcct.

Survc\ & Sub Div. No.

J

1

2

4

5 Karaika]

Pondicherry

17T Thennankud\

152/2 152'3 153/3 154/2

0.01.5 GP 0.30.0 0.04.5 0.02.0 GP.

0 . 3 8 A)

TOTAL

4. Devama Puram

152/2

0.02.0 0 15.0 0.09.0 0 16 5 0.03.0 GP 0.01.5 9.28.5 0.01.0 G. 0 00.5 GMP 0 n| o G.P 0.01.0 GP 0.11.5 0.31 0 0 07 0 0.0] .0 G.P 0 01.0 G.P 0.04.0 G.P 0.01.0 G.P

0.17.0

152/3A 152/3B 152/3C 153/1 153/2 153/3 153/5 167/1 169/1 154/1 154/2 I55/2C 93/3 93/4 92/1 92'2 92/4 90/3 89/1 89,6 R8/1 81/1 81/2

82/1 82/2 76/6 76'7 76/4 76/9 76/10 75 52

0.04.0 GP 0.15.0 0 0J .0 G.P. 0.00.5 G.P 0.02.0 0.01.5 GP 0.21.0 0.03.0 0.03.0 0.07.0 0.01.5G.P 0.10.5 0.04.0 G.P 0.00.5 G.PA16S T HE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18. 2001 /SRAVANA 11, 1923 FPAMT TT_ftnr ACiiM 1 5 3 4 Pondichorry Karaika! 0.01.0 G.P.

4. Devama Puram

'50/1 50/2 49/9 49/10 49/11 49/13 51/1 51/2

0.05.5 0.00.5 0.00.5 0.01.0 0.18.0 0.01.5 G.P 0.03.5

2~60.~5

TOTAL"

16. Sorakudy

18/4 D 18/5 19/1 19/2 19/3 19/4

19/5 20/1 20/3 A 16/5 16/7 16/8 16/9 16/11 15/1 3/1 3/2 3/3 3/4 3/6 4/1

0.02.5 0.01.0 0.06.0 0.00.5 0.00.5 0.10.0 0.01.0 0.06.0 0.01.5 0.01.0 0.01.5 0.08.0 0.04.5 0.01.5 G.P. 0.00.5 0.14.0 0.09.0 0.00.5 G.P. 0.01.0 0.02.0 G.P 0.05.0

TOTAL' 0.80.5

5. Nedunkadu

I38/2~ 138/3 142/1 142/2 141/1A 141/1B 141/2 141/3 141/4 140/3 140/4 140/5 140/6 140/7 140/8 139/3 139/4 151/3 152/1 152/: 291/1 291/2 291/3 291/5

0.00.5 ~~ 0.05.0 G.P. 0.01.5 0.07.5 0.02.5 0.01 0 0.03.5 0.05.0 0.05.0 0.01.5 0 07.5 0.04.0 0.04.5 0.03.0 0.00.5 0.01.0 0.09.5 0.01.5 G.P. 0.06.0GP 0.05.0 0.03.0 0.0570 0.01.0 0.04.5

0.89.0

TOTAL

[No. L-14014/18/101-G.P ] SWAMI SINGH, Director4169 . M << ( TI ; O OI 4170 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—Sfcc. 3 (ii)]

4J71

2415 GI 2001 64I7S Tl IF, GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18. 2 4179 4180 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART H—SEC. 3 (il)] 4181 4182 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 4183 41S4 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA' AUGUST IK, 2(X)1 SRAVANA27,1921 [PARTH—Stc 3 (ii)| 4185 241"i C.I/2001—74186 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC 3(ii)) 4187 4188 THE G AZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 4189

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2001

s. o. 2068.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Crude Oil from Virumgani in the State of Gujarat to Panipat in the State of Haryana via Chaksu in the State of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the " Augmentation of Viramgam- Chaksu, Chaksu-Panipat and Chaksu-Mathura sections of Salaya-Mathura Pipeline System":

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land "to Shri. J.K. Ahuja, Competent Authority, Salaya- Mathura Pipeline (Augumentation) Project, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Kothi No. 1439, Sector-15, Urban Estate, Sonepat (Haryana) - 131001.

Schedule Annexed41

Schedule

na

Jhajjar

Dist:Jtiajjar State: Haryw

Tehsll:

Khasra/

Hadbast

Mustatil

Area

M A I MA A| V/1i|s/*io

Killa No.

4

No. 3

13

29

No. 2 247

1 Koka

18 Hectare £

0

Are 6 03

0

06

Sq.Mtr. 7 29 83 0

02

28 0

03

54

51 0

00

22

23/1

23/2

31

2

9

12

19

21

22

1

43

2

10 11 20 21

45

5/2

6( 15

16 25

46

83 0

06

0

83 0

58 0

83

04 0

0

79

08 06 06 03 03

0

58 0

00

83 83 58 "3 0 0 0 0

06 00 06 06 06 06

0

0

0

0

02 06 06 06

53 83 58 83 0

06

58 0

04

1/1/1

10

56

5

307

246

24

Ahri

0

00

30 00 0

03

79 0

00

25 0

0

03 05

10/2

11/1

25

15

7/1

42

14

17

79 06 0

26

01

0

27 0

02 06

58

06

0

03

0

83 04 0

03

0

00

79 25

23

24/1

24/2

1 4 | 3

1 1 1 2 I1 3 556 0 0 7 29 08 26 0 77 [ 6 | 03 07 01 01 0 0

54

03

52

01

0

53

02

0

76

0

0

0

30 53

8 12/2/2/2 13/1 13/2 19/1/2 19/2/2 19/3 22/1 22/2

00 04 02

00

00

0

69

30

0

04

25/1

25/2

0

26

01

2/1

70

2/2

05

01

0 0

9/1

82 26 76

00

0

0

77

01

9/2

10/1

10/2

0

04

03

0

07

08

0

01

01

0

82

11

20/1

20/2

0

S3

OS 02

21

5/1

77

73

0 0

5/2

01 05

31

6/1

01

01

0 0

05

0

01

0

01

82 77 26

0

03

0

00

0

07

79 00 08

0

6/2

14/2

15/1

15/2

16/1

17

24/1

07

08

3/3

0

01

01

84

4/1

0

03

29

0

01

01

0

06

83

0

4/2 8 13

03

54

0

02

0

01

0 0

101 176/1 177 722 731/1

0

01 00 00

53 77 77 51 514192 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)l 7 I 54

I i 5

I 4 | 22

I 6 | 03

6 0

2 241

1 1 I

Asadpur Khera

2 9/2 11 12 19 20 21

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 01 05 00 06 06

83 83 52 31 25 58 83

20

1/1

1/2

10

11/1

11/2

20/1

21/1/3

30 53 58 29 26 58 30

04 02 06 03 01 06 04

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

29

1 10 11 20 21

04 06 06 06 06

55 58 58 58 58

0 0 0 0 0

00

30

27

0

76

41

6 15 16 24 25

0 0 0 0 0

01 07 07 01 06

52 08 08 26 07

42

1 10 11

0 0 0

07 05 00

08 82 25

52

31 77 00 08 26 07 00 08 05 77

4/1 4/2 5/1 7 13 14 17 18 23/1 23/2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

05 01 00 07 01 06 00 07 04 01

60

2 3

0 0

02 04

53 814193 1 1

I 2 I 3 I 4 | 8 9 12 19/1 19/2 20 21 22 26

I 6 | 00 06 06 03 03 00 05 01 00

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 00 83 83 54 29 25 56 26 51

67

1 10

0 0

32 79

06 03

0 0 0

71 77 80

01 02 01

77 28 01

24

Machhraull

23

240

0

01

26

34

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 7/2 7/3 13 14 18/1 18/3 23 26

06 01 05 03 03 02 03 06 02

83 52 06 54 54 02 04 58 02

47

0* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 05 01 01 05 00 06 06

58 56 52 77 06 25 83 58

3 8 9 12/1 12/2 13 19 22

64

05 00 06 00 06 01 05 06

2/1 2/2 g 11 12 19 20 21

06 76 58 25 58 77 31 83

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

76

16 25

26 83

0 0

01 06

2m c;i 2001 x41'M THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA 27,1923 [PARTII—SEC 3 ( U )] 1 I 3 I 2 I ⁶ I ⁷ '¹ 58 77 0 0 0 0

I 4 | 1 10 11 20/2 21

83 05 83 51

94

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

58 79 02 76 07 58 52 31

5 6/1 6/2 15/1 15/2 16 24/2 25

06 03 0? 00 06 06 01 Q6

103

0 0 0 0 0 0

06 00 06 06 05 06

58 25 68 83 56 32

4 5 7 14 17 24

73

116

Q1

0 0

O3

3 4 7 8/1 13 10 23

0 0 0 0 0

00 06 06 0t$ 06

31 25 58 58 58 83

124

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 05 01 05 00 06 01

3 8 9 12 13 19 22

83 31 52 56 51 58 77

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

258 259 260 261 957 958 1033

01 01 01 01 00 00 00

01 01 01 52 51 00 51 Chandpur

239

01

22

0

26

3

10

0

06

2

584195

I 3 |

I 6 I

1 1

\ 2 I

5 I

7 I 52 51 53 83 58 07

01 00 02 06 06 06

0 0 0 0 0 0

I 4 | 9/1/1 9/1/2 9/2 12 19 22

19

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

03 04 00 06 06 06 06

04 05 25 58 58 58 83

1 2 9 10 11 20 21

25

0 0 0 0

52 82 83 83

6 15 16/2 25/1

01 05 06 06

26

0 0 0

83 31 25

1 10 11

06 05 00

40

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 02 04 06 05 01 03 03

83 02 81 58 56 52 04 04

5/1 6/2 7/1 14 17/1 17/2 24/1 24/2

0 0 0

02 00 00

28 51 51

91 263 267

Dadanpur

238

2

17 18 23

0 0 0

05 03 06

06 54 83

7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 06 04 02 06 00

3 8 13 18 19 22 23

58 83 83 81 02 58 254196 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVAN A 27,1923 [PAR ill—SEC. 3 (ii)| 1 1 I 2 I 3 | 12 7 I 58 56 26 55 28 83 25 55 02

6 I 06 05 01 04 02 06 00 04 02

5 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 | 2 9/1 9/3 12/1 12/2 19 20 21 22

23

56 26 07 83 58 58

05 01 06 06 06 06

0 0 0 0 0 0

1/1 1/2 10 11 20 21

25

00

0

25

24

29

05 06 03 06 01 05

06 58 54 83 26 56

0 0 0 0 0 0

5 6 15 16 25/1 25/2

77

01

0

1

30

44

00 58

52

00 06 01 00 01

0 0 0 0 0

4 5 6 7 14/3

50

77 58 25 25 05 02 32 83

01 06 00 00 04 02 06 06

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 7 8 13/1/2 13/2 14 18/1 23

65

58 83 00 58 04 26

06 06 00 06 03 01

0 0 0 0 0 0

3 8 12/3 13 18 19/14197 I 2 I 3

1 1

7 78 25 82

5 I 0 0 0

I 6 | 02 00 05

I 4 |

19/2

22/1

22/2

54 76 01 51 51 28

03 00 01 00 00 02

Raipur

1

0 0 0 0 0 0

132 142/1-3 143/1-3 153 474 24

236

6

83 83 00 05 28 83 32

06 06 00 04 02 06 06

4 7 8 13 14 18 23

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

g

3 8 12 13 19/1 22/1 22/2 27

83 30 54 04 32 55 28 53

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 04 03 03 06 04 02 02

18

2 g 11 12 19/2 20 21 26

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

83 32 02 30 00 84 90 00

06 06 02 04 00 07 12 00

20

15 16 24 25

0 0 0 0

76 08 00 33

00 07 00 07

21

1 10 11 20/1

37 33 82 25

0 0 0 0

10 07 05 00

30

4 5

00 06

00 32

0 04198 THEGAZETTEOFINDIA:AUGUST18,2001SRAVANA27fI923 [PART B--SEC. 3 (8)} I 3

I 2

1 1

i 4 r 6 14 15 16 17 24

S 0 0 0 0 0 0

I e I 06 00 00 01 04 06

7 | 58 25 32 77 55 83

32

4 7 14

0 0 0

00 00 05

83 83 50 200

Gijaroacf

5

245 248 250 252 250 257 14 17 24

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

51 51 51 01 51 51 07 83 58

00 00 00 01 00 00 06 06 00

14

3 4 r & 13 18 22 23

00 06 01 05 06 00 00 04

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 58 77 06 83 58 70 81

21

3 8 9 12 13 18 19 22 23

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

00 05 01 06 00 01 05 00 07

83 06 77 58 25 52 31 00 08

32

3 8 12/2 19 20 21

0 0 0 0 0 0

07 08 07 03 05 06

08 09 08 54 31 58

39

1/1

0

05

564199 2 1 1 I I 3 5 0 0 0

I 6 | 01 06 01

7 01 58 52

I 4 | 1/2/1 10 11

40

00 05

25 31

0 0

6 15

49

04 05 04 04

0 0 0 0

30 31 81 05

15 17 24 27

26 26 25 25

0 0 0 0

01 01 00 00

120/1 122 378 389/1

Sllanl Pana Kesho

263

57

0 0 0 0

06 03 00 03

07 04 76 54

13/1 22/1 22/2 23

63

0 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 06 06 01 05

32 83 83 83 01 82

2 9 12 19 21 22

89

90

0 0 0 0 0 0

03 03 00 06 06 00

1/1 1/2 2 20 21 25

04 54 25 07 83 00

95

5 6 25

0 0 0

04 04 03

55 30 79

0

96

1

02

53

102

0 0 0 0

4/2 5/1 5/2 7/1

02 01 01 07

78 52 01 08

114 117

0 0

18 13

97 414200 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)l 6 2 7 I 3 1 I I 6 | 00 0 51 I 4 | 410 0 51 412 00 417 00 0 51 418 00 0 51 3

0 Silani Pana Zalim

262

6 7

0

14

0 0

17

0

24

3

0

e

0

4

0

7

0

8

0

13

0

18 23/1

0

23/2

0

17

0

16

0

17

24

0

2

18

0

3

0

8

0 0

9

0

11

0

12

0

20/2

31

4

0 0

7

0

8 13

0

14

0

17/2

0

18

0

23/1

0

3

41

0

0

8/1 01

77 06

58 06

83 83 06

83 06

00

76

79 03 00

76

82 05

83 06

83 06 01

01

82 05

04

55 03

54 06

32

25 00 06

58 02

02 81 04

00

26 07

34

51 00

06

83 06

58 00

00 04 03

05 04 00

00 06

83

83 06

83 06

00

254201 1 2 I 3 I 4 57

67

68

84

93

8/2 12 13/1 18 19 22 2/1 2/2 9 11 12 19 20 21 16 25/2 1 10 11 20 27 5 6 15 16/2/1 17 24/2 25/1 4/1 4/2 4/3 7 14 17 23 24

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 55 02 30 00 58 32 01 82 83 25 58 52 06 58 26 58 32 56 83 05 26 56 83 83 31 01 32 76 77 77 04 83 83 83 76 28

L • 04 02 04 00 06 06 01 05 06 00 06 01 05 06 01 06 06 05 06 04 01 05 06 06 05 01 06 00 01 01 03 06 06 06 00 02

136 159 433 459 469

0 0 0 0 0

01 78 78 51 51

01 02 02 00 00

Jhajjar

100

6

7

10 11 20 21 " 15/1

0 0 0 0 0 0

00 02 05 08 10 06

76 02 06 09 12 32 241^ GI/2001 94202 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA-AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 3 1 2 15

16

21

43

47

7 J 52 06 02 00 54 82 83 02 58 25 52 06 32 52 31 25 58 83 76 04 00 04 79 28 58 00 83

6 01 05 02 00 03 05 06 02 06 00 01 05 06 01 05 00 06 06 00 03 00 03 03 02 06 00 06 06 ___..aa---

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

OD

4 15/2 16/1 25 5 6 15 16/1 25/1 1 10/1 10/2 17 24 4/1 4/2 7/4 7/5 14 17/1/2 17/2 18/1 18/2 23/1 23/2 3/1 3/2 8 13 18

58 76 30 78

00 04 02

0 0 0

23 22

72

73

76 56 26 77 58 58 83

00 05 01 01 06 06 06

1 2/1 9/2 10 11 20/2 21

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

102

77 83 29 29

01 06 03 03

15

16/1

25/1

25/2

0 0 0 0

1

103

06 06 01

58 07 77

0 0 0

10 11/1

-4203 ¹ JL ² I ³ 107 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0

4 I 5 6 15/1 15/2 16 17 24 25

6 06 06 05 01 05 01 06 00

7 32 83 82 01 31 52 58 51

132

0 0 0 0 0 0

4 7 14 17 23 24

06 06 06 06 00 05

07 58 83 83 25 56

136

3/1 3/2 4/1 8 13 18/1 18/2 23/1 24

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

00 05 01 06 06 01 05 01 02

00 23 09 07 58 77 56 26 02

164

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4/1 4/2 6 7 15 16/1 16/2 16/3 17 24 25/1

00 01 04 02 06 01 01 03 00 03 02

51 27 05 53 58 77 77 04 51 79 78

173

4 5 7 14 17/1 17/2 24

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 00 06 06 02 04 06

58 00 58 83 02 30 83

203

4 7 14/1

0 0 0

06 06 01

02 58 014204 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)1 1 1 ² I 37 J 62 6 05 01

i_ 4 -L

14/2

17/1

17/2

17/3

18/1

18/2

01 77 00 25 04

01 01 01 00 00 03

80

23 24

03

6 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3

82

05

216

01

4

00

772

01 00

0 0 0

80

03

3

0

248

26

8/2

0

81

0

01 04 06

13 18/2

0

00

19

0 0

22

0

03 03

58 25 54 54

23

06

261

0

00

0

32 25 00

00

0

83

0

0

0

22

06

83

0

05

296

06

02

03

31 58 53 79 58

06

53

02

55

04

9/2 12/1 12/2 19 21 22/1/1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

304

06

32

1

0

51

00

0

83

06

0

83

06

0

05

04

0

04

2/1

10

11/2

20/1

20/2

0

58

03 06

21

0

00

00

340

0

08

60

0

01

01

36

09

14/2

15/2

16

17/2

0 04205 2 I 3 ¹ 1 6 00 7 25 4 24 0 341 58 56 01

06 05 01

1 10 11

0 0 0

348

50 04 25

00 03 00

0 0 0

2/1 2/2 10/2

349

01 06 03 03 06

27 83 04 79 58

6/1 15 16/1 16/2 25

0 0 0 0 0

381

00 05

25 31

4 5

0 0

06 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 00 06 04 00 01 00 03 00 00 00 00 01

58 25 76 25 25 25 76 01 01 25 25 58 81 51 52 51 79 25 25 76 51 77

1238 1240 1260 1295 1296 1311 1318 1355 1430 1450 1459 1479 1482 1540 1544 1572 1586 1596 1597 1634 1669 1707

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kaimal Garti

9

102

00

23

0

00

11

05 00 06

2 3 9

0 0 0

82 00 584206 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 5 3 2 6 7 1 4 X 0 06 83 12/2 19/1 0 53 02 84 19/2 0 07 0

64 73

0

77 01

51 00

Garawar

106

7

5

14

0 0

17

0

0

18

23

0

3/1

0

11

3/2

0 0 0

8 13/1

0

06 05

58

06 06 05

01

01 06

32

54 03 02

28 06

58 05

31

13/2

18

0

0

22

0

23

2

20

0

3

0

9/1

0

0

12

0

19

0

22

15

26

0

16

0

24

0

0

25

1

27

0

0

2

0 01

26 06

58 02

02 81 04

06

58 00 00

06

58 06

58 06

58 06

58 01

01 12

39 04

05 08

85

55 04 04

55

10/1

0

30

10/2/2

0 04 00

00 04

10/3/1

10/3/2

0

11

0

20

0

43

4/1

0

0

4/2

0

4/3

7/1

0

0

112 8

0 03 01

77 10

00

63 25 00

00 03

79 08

09 53 02 05

06 03

794207 5 1 ... I ² I 3 0 0 0 0 0

6 12 06 06 02 10

7 90 83 07 02 88

4 13 18 19/2 22/1 22/2

48

15 16 24/1 24/2 25

08 11 01 08 03

0 0 0 0 0

09 38 01 09 04

49

1/1

1/2

1/3

2/1

10/1

10/2

11/1

11/2

03 02 01 05 12 00 01 03

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

04 78 26 56 90 00 26 79

67

21

01

0

01

68

4 7 14 17 18 23 24 25/1 25/2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 11 11 13 03 00 09 04 05

38 13 13 66 04 00 61 55 06

73

5

0

01

01

1

74

e

10 1271 12/2 13/1 17 18 23 24

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13 09 05 04 04 03 00 14 01 11

91 11 31 05 55 29 51 67 26 38

79

4 7 13 14/1

0 0 0 0

06 06 00 05

07 58 25 064208 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PAKT II—SEC 3 (n)l i 6 1 I ² J 3 _ J 4

14/2 17 18 23

6 0 0 0 0

01 01 05 06

7 26 77 31 58

87

0 0 0 0

3 8 13 18

06 06 06 00

58 58 58 51

90

12 19 20 21 22

0 0 0 0 0

06 07 01 12 00

58 84 01 40 76

97

5

0

02

78

98

1 10

0 0

10 00

63 51

120 122 141 142 143 149 153 154 278 280 281 304 315 318 320

78 28 51 25 51 26 25 51 25 25 51 52 51 51 01

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

02 02 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 01

[No R-25011/24/2001 OR-I]

S CHANDRASEKHAR, Under Secy

24.15 GI/2001 - 104210 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUSTT 18,20019RAVANA27,1923 [PART H—SEC. 3 (ii)] 4211 4212 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 4213 4214 THEGAZETTEOFINDIA:AUGUST18,2001SRAVANA27,1923 [PART H—SHC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2001

s.o.2069.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam in the State of Gujarat to Panipat in the State of Haryana via Chaksu in the State of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the " Augmentation of Viramgam- Chaksu, Chaksu-Panipat and Chaksu-Mathura sections of Salaya-Mathura Pipeline System";

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, arc made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri. J.K. Ahuja, Competent Authority, Salaya- Mathura Pipeline (Augumentation) Project, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Kothi No. 1439, Sector-15, Urban Estate, Sonepat (Haryana) - 131001.

Schedule Annexed4215

Schedule

Tehsll: Bahaduraarh Dist:Jhaiiar State: Harvana

N a me of Village

Mustatil No. 3

1

Chhara

Hadbast No. 2 17

Khasra/Killa No. 4 18 17 29/3 30 36 37 46 104 105 106 107 110 112 119 125 127 128 129 132 133 6726/137 138 139 1449 1573 1594 1595 1596 1598 6012/1617 6013/1617 1818 1619 1620 1621 1627 1631/1 1631/2 1632 5647/1634 1689 1690 1691 5658/1695 1699 1700

Area Hectare Are Sq.Mtr. 6 06 11 00 03 10 07 02 05 01 11 03 05 01 01 00 05 06 00 06 05 08 08 02 18 03 13 03 03 07 02 02 05 16 01 03 08 05 01 06 08 00 05 01 01 06 15

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 32 38 25 79 12 59 53 06 26 38 79 06 26 26 00 06 32 00 32 06 32 32 53 44 79 91 79 79 59 53 53 08 44 26 79 85 06 26 32 85 00 06 26 26 32 214216 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART 11—SEC. 3 (ii)l 3 |_ 6 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

05 05 05 02 07 10 01 00 07 03 03 07 06 06 03 03 06 06 06 01 19 08 00 01 01 13 07 00 01 03 08 01 08 10 01 11 06

4 1706 1708 1709 1710 1766 1767 1769 1950 6028/5674/2118 6029/5674/2118 5675/2118 5676/2128 5679/2139 2140 5697/2190 5698/2190 2187 2188 2189 2193 2194 2195 2196 2200 2213 2215/2 2216 2224 2240 2241 2242 2243 2245 2246 2247 2267 2268

7 06 06 06 53 59 12 26 00 59 79 79 37 32 32 79 79 32 32 32 26 00 85 00 26 26 91 59 00 26 79 85 26 85 12 26 38 32 Agarpur

14

3

0 0 0 0

11 20/1 21/1 21/2

00 06 02 03

00 58 78 29

8

0 0 0

15 16 25

29 58 83

03 06 06

9

0 0

1 10

83 83

06 064217 1 2 3 | I ⁵ 0 6 03 7 29 4 11 15 82 51 58 25 32 51 28 05 07

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

05 00 06 00 06 00 02 04 06

5/1 5/2 6 14 15/1 15/2 16 17 24/2

21

00 05 06 06 05 01 06 00

25 82 32 58 56 52 58 51

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4/1 4/2 7 14 17 18 23 24

26

06 06 01 05 06 02 03

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 8 13/1 13/2 18 22 23

83 83 77 06 83 53 54

34

0 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 06 06 00 06

2/2 9 12 19/1 21 22

58 83 83 58 25 58

38

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

04 01 00 05 06 06 06

1/1 2/1 9/1 10 11 20 21

81 52 25 06 58 83 07

48

0 0 0 0 0

5 6 15 18 25

01 06 06 06 06

26 07 83 83 32

1/1

0

49

05

31 2435 CH/2001 - 11n l X THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 IPART II —SEC. 3 (ii)l 6 7_ 4 I " I 1 ³ 5 52 06 03 01 06 06 06

58 29 01 07 83 83

0 0 0 . 0 0 0

e 7 14 17 24

60

05 • 00

56 00

4 7

0 0

84 88 89

as

26 25 25 01 01 51 51 26 51 51 ?6 25

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

96 98 103 106 118 125 128 138 147

00 00 0Q 01 01 00 00 01 00 PQ QQ 90 9,6

jmfc23flU#3£G(>lQR-I]

S. CHANDRASEKHAR, Under Secy.

^'•^^rlJcHh-/^

_ 4233 2411 OI 2001 H42^4 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART H—SEC, 3 (ii)] 4235 42% THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 4237 4238 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 4239 4240 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 rpARr II—SF.C. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2001

s.o.2070.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam in the State of Gujarat to Panipat in the State of Ilaryana via Chaksu in the State of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the " Augmentation of Viraingam- Cliaksu, Chaksu-Panipat and Chaksu-Mathura sections of Salaya-Mathura Pipeline System";

And. whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, n is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described-m the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User m Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person,-interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the dale on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Slid. J.K. Ahuja, Competent Authority, Salaya- Mathura Pipeline (Augumenlation) Project, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Kothi No. 1439, Sector-15, Urban Estate, Sonepat (Haryana) - 131001.

Schedule

Tehsil: Gohana Dist:Soneoat State: Harvana

Name of Village

Sq.Mtr 7 Hadbast No. 2

Khasra/

Killa No.

4

Area Are 6

Mustatll No. 3

4/1

81 1 Glwana

74

Hectare. 5 0

13

7

58

0

25

0

25

0

04 06 00 00

0

05 01

56 26

0 0

01

26 82

0

8 13/1 13/2 14 18/1 18/2 23

05 06

83

0

2

51

0

32

00 06

07

0

0

01

0

06

0

06 06

3/1 3/2 9 12 19

01 07 83 32

0

00

21

00

0 0

05

22

56

05

36

06 77

0 0

01

07

0

06

0

00

25

06

58

0 0

02

53

04

55 06

0 0

05 01

1 2 10 11/1 11/2 20/1 20/2 21/1 21/2

52

0

55

00

00

0 0

02

6 15/1 15/2

02 77

0

01

1

0

56

58

10

0

06 06

07

11

0

01

20

26 00

0

00

00

60

0 0

00

25 25

6 14/1 14/2

0

01

26

15

0

05

56

0

00 05

25 31

16 17/1

0

2 IT* Cil/2001 144242 THEGAZETTEOFINDIA:AUGUSTl8t2001SRAVANA27,1923 [PARTH— SEC. 3(ii)l I 2 | 1 1

I. I I

I * I

17/2 24/1/1 24/1/2

5 0 0 0

I 6 | 00 00 06

7 I 76 00 83

7S

4/1/1 4/1/2 4/2 7/1 7/2 13/1 13/2 14 17 18 23

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

01 01 03 06 01 00 02 03 00 07 04

52 52 54 05 77 77 28 54 00 84 30

83

3 8 9 12 13/1 13/2 19/1 19/2 22/1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 07 00 04 02 00 03 03 06

83 08 00 81 02 51 04 79 32

101

2/1 2/3 9/2 10 11 12 20 21

06 00 06 00 05 01 06 06

32 51 07 51 82 01 83 83

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104

1

0

00

76

135 137 231 235 245 593 608

2/2

01 01 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00

o15 653

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

52 01 51 53 51 51 51 00 51 51 Anwli

71

05

12

13

0

064243 1 I 2 I 3

S 0 0 0

I 6 | 05 01 06

7 I 06 77 83

I 4 |

18

19/1

22

0

04

55

26

2

85

9 12 13 19 22/2

0 0 0 0 0

03 04 02 06 06

79 30 53 83 83

66

86

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 01 06 00 06 05 01 01 06 06 06

83 07 01 07 51 83 56 52 52 32 83 32

2 9 10 11/2 12 20 21 6/1 8/2 15 16 25

87

1 10/1 10/2 11

0 0 0 0

06 03 00 00

83 79 25 00

89

4 5 6 7 14/1/1 14/2/2 17 24

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

00 07 01 05 03 01 06 06

00 08 77 06 79 26 83 32

108

3 4 7 8 13/1 13/2 18 19

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

00 06 01 05 05 00 02 00

76 58 01 56 32 76 53 76

2

112

0

02

784244 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART H—SEC. 3 (ii)l 1 1

I 2 I 3

I 6 | 02 02 06 06 02

7 02 27 32 83 28

5 0 0 0 0 0

I 4 | 9 10 11 20 21

113

0 0

25/2 25/3

00 01

25 28

129

5 6/1 6/2 14 15 16 17 24

06 05 01 00 06 01 06 06

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

83 06 77 51 58 01 07 32

4

02

134

0

28

02 01 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 02 01

349 350 351 363 365 366 367 368 1291 1305 1307

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

78 26 26 51 51 51 26 51 51 02 77 BUbilan

72

7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

05 05 01 03 03 03 03 06 00

2 9/1 9/2 12/1 12/2 19 20 21 22

06 06 77 29 29 54 54 83 00

9

15 16 25

0 0 0

00 05 06

00 06 83

10

1/1 1/2 10

03 03 06

0 0 0

29 54 324245 2 ! 1 I I 3 7 32 02

I 6 | 06 02

6 0 0

I 4 |

11

20

26

5 6 14 15 16 17 24/1 24/2 24/3

83 83 01 07 51 58 02 26 05

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 01 06 00 06 02 01 04

27

4/1 4/2 7 13 14 18 23

83 00 83 54 54 83 83

06 00 06 03 03 06 06

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

48

3 8

0 0

83 78

06 02

00 00

315 495

0 0

51 51 Bhamswal Kalan Mithan

34

68

4 7 13/2 14 17

02 83 78 06 00

02 06 02 05 00

0 0 0 0 0

36

51 28 83 83

1271 12/2 19 22

00 02 06 06

0 0 0 0

56

06 05 01 06 00 06 06

2 9/2 10 11 12/1 20 21

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

58 56 52 07 00 83 32

59

6 15 16

0 0 0

54 83 58

03 06 064246 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 IPART H—SEC. 3 (ii)l I 6 | 06

7 I 83

I 4 |

25

6 01 06 60 58 54 03 10 0 0 4 82

5

6

7 14

16

17/1

17/2 24/1 86

3

4/1 8

12

13

19 21

22

1 108

76

0

00

07

0

06

76

0

00 06

07

0

06

32

0 0

00

00 79

0

03

0

00

51

0

06

83

0

56

0

05 01

26 83

0

06 05

06

0 0

02

02

0

07

08 06

0

05 02

02

0

0

07

33

00

21/1

21/2

22

25 115

116

1/1

1/2

2/1 10

00

0

00

51

0 0

06

58

01

26

0

0

03

29

0

02

28

0

01

26 83

0

06

11/1

20/1/2/1 20/1/2/2

20/2 21

1/1 135

5 136

6

15

16/1 0

06 04

83 81

0 0

01

01

0 0

01 04

01 81

0

00

00

0

06

32

0

06

83 32

06

0 0

01

014247 2 I 3 1 1 I 7 I 79 79 52 00

I 6 | 03 03 01 00

5 0 0 0 0

I 4 |

16/2

24/2

25/1/1

25/1/2

140

83 83 32 58 51 07 26

06 06 06 06 00 06 01

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 7 14 17 18 23 24

153

83 83 77

0 0 0

06 06 01

3 8 13

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

01 02 01 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

182 185 280 282 283 292 296 301 302 984 989/5 1002 1071 1072 1078 1082 1083 1092

77 78 01 51 51 51 51 02 51 51 51 51 51 00 51 51 CO 51

38

67

Bhainswal Kalan Bawla

01 00 33 83

0 0 0 0

01 00 07 06

15 16 17 24

53

55 81 32

0 0 0

04 04 06

4 18 23

56

0 0

06 04

83 55

3 8/14248 THEGAZETTEOFINDIA:AUGUST18,2001SRAVANA27,1923 [PARI U— SEC. 3 (ii)] 5 I 2 I 3 1 1 I 4 | 8/2 I 6 | 02 9 0 0 7 28 00 00 12 0 28 02 13

0

0

278 853

0

877

0

15

Katwal

69

8

0

23

0

16

0

0

0

g 12/1 19/2 20

21

0 0

39

0

0 0

15/2 16/1 25/2

1

0

40

0

10

0

11

0

20

42

0

5/1

0

5/2

6/1

0

6/2

0 0

14

0

150 859

0

0 0

897 930/1 931

0

37

0

65

Lath

18

0

23

62

0

0

2/2 3/1 8 9/1

0 0

0

0

0

9/2 12/1 12/2 19

0 02

02 02

02 00 00

51 00

01

00

77 25

83 06

58 06

30 04 02

78 05

82

25 00 04

55 06

58 06

83 06

83 06

58 02 02

03

04 54 03 05

01

02

06 77 02 03

04 01 01

51 00 00

51 00

51 00

00 06

83

00 00 06

83 03

04 01

52 02

78 29 03

26 01 06

834249 | 7

I 6 |

I 4 I 6

1 1 II 2 |I' 366 0 0 0

52 58 58

01 06 06

11/1/3

20

21

90

76 82 58 83 82

5/3 6/1 15 16 25

0 0 0 0 0

00 05 06 06 05

91

81 00

1 10

0 0

04 00

96

25 51 25 83 08 83 83

4/2 6 5/1/1 5/1/2 14 17 24

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

00 00 00 06 07 06 06

117

3 4 7 8 13 18/1 23

00 05 01 05 06 06 06

51 82 26 06 83 58 83

122

2 3 8/3 9/1 12/1 12/2 19 22

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

01 05 00 06 00 06 06 06

77 56 25 32 76 32 83 58

25

140

0

00

25

141

1 2 10 11

0 0 0 0

03 02 06 03

54 28 58 04

1/1

0

01

147

26

5/2

0

00

148

25 243.1 GI/2001 - 154250 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—Stc 3 (ii)l 1 1

I 3

I 2

I 4 |

5/3

6/1

6/2

15/4

15/5

16/2

16/3

16/4

24/1

24/2"

25

6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

I 6 | 06 06 00 00 06 00 05 00 00 02 04

7 07 58 25 25 58 25 56 51 25 53 05

163

4/2 7 14 17 18/1 23/1 23/2 24/1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 06 07 00 03 01 01

32 58 83 08 00 79 26 26

166

3

0

07

59

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

212

220/1

238

240

285

286

287

1285

1328

1329

1346

1348

1357

1363

1364

58 66 04 01 51 02 52 51 77 51 51 51 51 51 01

06 13 03 01 00 02 01 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01

Jauli

61

1

25

26

01

0

2

21

0

00

76

17

5 8

0 0

58 06

06 05

19

25 58 00

0 0 0

00 06 00

6 7 14/14251 r 1 i! ² |I ³

I 6 | 05 05 06

7 | 31 56 58

I 6

0

0

0

I 4 | 14/2 17 24

39

00 58 05 04 08 00 58 58

3 4 7 8 13 14 18 23

00 06 04 03 07 00 06 06

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

43

3 111 8 13 14/1 25

05 02 22 07 09 04

82 79 51 84 00 05

0 0 0 0 0 0

10

37

44

21

0

66

18 04 06 05 01 06 00 06

47 04 07 57 01 58 51 58

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 2/1 9/2 12/1 12/2 19 21/2 22

67

00

00

0

5

74

01 05 04 02 03 03 02 05 02 03

52 31 55 53 54 54 02 06 78 54

1 2 9 10 11 12 19/2 20 21/1 21/2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

96

06 08 03 06 06

58 60 79 58 58

1 10 11 20 21

0 0 0 0 04252 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVAN A 27,1923 [PAR I II—SEC 3 (n)] 1 1 II 2 I 3 I 7 105 07 32 58 55 02 04 51 29

I 6 | 06 06 06 04 02 03 00 03

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

I 4 | 1 10 11 20/1 20/2 21/1 21/2 21/3

126

32 58 07 58 58

06 06 06 06 06

1 10 11 20 21

0 0 0 0 0

134

32 58 58 58 32

06 06 06 06 06

1 10 11 20/2 21

0 0 0 0 0

152

06 06 06 05 03

58 32 58 06 54

0 0 0 0 0

1 10 11 20 21

153

51 02 54

00 02 03

0 0 0

15/2 16 25

157

00 54 07 58 58 58

0 0 0 0 0 0

5/1 5/2 6 15 16 25

00 03 06 06 06 06

158

02 01

28 01

0 0

1 10

175

76 84 53 76 83 37 00

00 07 06 00 06 12 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 5/1 7 8 13 18 244253 I 2

1 1

I 3 T~" 4 I

250 288 298 302 311 321 322 335 337 356 357 361 1356 1382 1392 1412 1417 1432 1444

I 6 | 01 03 02 02 00 01 01 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

7 26 04 28 02 51 01 77 02 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 25 51 51 51

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nayat

62

23

06

07

40

0

42

3 8

0 0

06 06

32 58

61

00 04 06 04 00 01 05 00

2 9 12 19/2 20/1 20/2 21/2 22

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o •

00 55 58 30 00 52 56 00

64

1/2 10 11/1 11/2 20

06 06 00 06 09

0 0 0 0 0

83 07 51 32 61

65

25

0

01

52

94 182 183 327/1 327/2 328/1 328/2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

02 00 00 00 00 01 01

28 51 51 51 51 52 524254 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SBC. 3 (ii)] 2 5 I 4 | I 6 | 1 3 1 1 1 7 1 Kakana Bahadurl 23 02 57 2 0 0 78 78 24 02 11

0

58

3

06

0

00

00

0

02

78

0

51

4 8/1/1 8/1/2

00

0

29

8/2 13

0

58

0

03 06 06

58

18 23

0

06

83

15

0

82

3 8/1

05 03

0

04

8/2

0

03

29

9

00

0

76

12

03

0

54

13

01

0

01

26

0

03

04

0

07 05

0 0

01

33 06 26

0

00

0

00

0

06

0

01

9/1 12/2 19/2 20/1 20/2 20/3 21/1 21/2 22/1

0

00

51 25 07 01 25

30

0

00

00

0

25/1 25/2

02

02

31

0

06

07

06

58

0 0

06

58

0

00

0

06

01

51 07 52

0 0

1/1 10/2 11/1 20/1 20/2/3 21/1 21/2/1

03

54

1

42

0

25

00

5

43

0

32

6

0

06 06

07

15

0

06

58

0

16

06

0

25

58 58

06

5

46

0

58

064255 I 3

I 2

1 I

I " 7 I

I 6 | 06 02 02 06 00 06 00

58 53 02 07 25 07 25

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

I 4 | 6 15/1 15/2 16 17/1 24 25/1

60

01 05 06 04 01 00 06 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4/1 4/2 7 13 14/1 14/2 18/1 24

77 05 83 30 77 51 58 25

00 01 02 00 00 01 00 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

89/1

95

104

224

227

228

230

571

576

614/2

51 52 28 51 51 26 51 51 51 51

5

56

Khanpur Kalan

0 0 0

17/1

17/2

24

02 04 06

78 05 58

17

06 06 00 07 03 03 06

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 7 13 14 17 18 23

58 58 00 08 29 79 07

26

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 8/1 8/2 8/3/1 8/3/2 13 18 19/1 22

06 02 00 00 00 06 06 00 02

58 28 76 51 76 07 58 00 02 *———-- . .

¹ I 2 |I 3 |

I 4 | 23

7 28

I 5 | 0

I 6 | 02

39

0 0 0 0 0

2/2 9 12 19 22

06 06 06 06 06

58 58 58 58 58

55

1 2 9/1 10 11/2 20 21

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

02 04 00 06 06 06 05

28 30 00 58 58 58 31

69

6 15

01 05

77 06

0 0

70

11 26

0 0

02 11

53 13

88

6 14 15 16/1 17 24

03 00 06 01 04 06

80 76 07 52 05 83

0 0 0 0 0 0

100

4/1 4/2 7/1 7/2 14/1 17 18 23 24

79 76 01 82 07 06 25 06 25

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

03 02 01 05 06 05 00 05 00

119

3 8 13/1 13/2 18 23/1 22

06 06 04 01 06 06 00

58 58 05 52 58 58 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

135

0 0

04 03

2 3/1

05 044257 1 1 I ² I 3

7 I 00 58 58 04 51 26 01 06 76

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

I 6 | 00 06 06 03 00 01 01 05 00

I 4 | 8 9 12 19/1 19/2/1 19/2/2 22/1/1 22/1/2 22/2

147

05 59 58 58 08 79

0 0 0 0 0 0

04 07 06 06 07 03

2/1 9 12 19 21/2 22

163

00 04 02 04

15 16/1 25/1 25/2

00 05 28 30

0 0 0 0

164

13 13 58 04

0 0 0 0

11 11 06 03

1 10 11/1 20

172

58 58 53 05 30 77 00 52 29 76

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 02 04 04 01 00 01 03 00

5 6 15/1 15/2 16/1 16/2 17/2 24/1 24/2 25

t84

02 03 00 03 02 05 00 02 07

53 79 25 54 53 82 00 02 84

0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0

4/1 4/3 14/1 14/3 17/1 17/2 18/1 26/1 26/2

01 01

01 26

0 0

236 243

241? GI 2001 -164258 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 IPARTII—SEC. 3 (ii)l 2 1 1 I I 3 I 6 | 01 01 00 00 00 00 01 00 02 00 00 00 00 03

7 26 01 51 51 51 51 77 51 02 51 51 51 51 55

I 4 ,| 248 251 529 531 537 548 579 581 588 870 873 875 902 946

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

38

Shamri Seesan

54

0 0 0 0 0

01 06 01 06 06

01 07 52 07 58

8 12 13 19 22

44

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 06 06 00 04 01

2 9 12 19 20 21 22

83 58 58 58 51 55 77

57

58 05 04 58 83 58

1 10/1 10/2 11 20 21/1

0 0 0 0 0 0

06 04 03 06 06 06

66

01 06 06 06 06

26 58 58 58 07

5 6 15 16 25/1

0 0 0 0 0

67

0 0

05 00

56 76

1 10

82

06 06 00 04

58 07 25 55

5 6 7/1 14

0 0 0 04259 2 I I 3

1 1 I

I 4 | 15/1 15/2

161 164 698

710 5 |

I 6 | 7 76 00 0 0

00 00

76 51 0 0

00 00

0

03

54 51 0

00

Shamri Buran

53

2

6 15/2 16/1 25

10

3

11

5

8

6 7 14 17/1 24

4

12

7

13

14

17

18

23

23

3 0

78 0

02 06

58 83

06

0 0

32

06

54 0 0

03 00

00

83 0

06

30

04

0 0

28

02

0

78 0

02 06

58 58 0

06

58

06

0 0

58

06

76 0

00

06

0 0

58 26

01

56

05

0 0

83

06

58

06

0 0

83

06 06

0 0

58 00

00

07

06

0 0

00

0

76 58

06

8

13/1/1/1

13/1/1/2

18/2

19

22

23/1

28

2

9 12

19

21

22

39

1/2

2 0

01

01

83 ' 0 0

06 06

0

58 83

06

0

83

06

0

52 0

56

01 05

05

0 0

32 01

0142") THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27.1923 [PARrll—SEC 3 MI " 7 ~ | ¹ I 2 I 3

I 4 7

T "6 ~I

56 83 83 29 29

10/1 11 20 21/1 21/2

6 0 0 0 0 0

06 06 06 03 03

46

06 00 04 00 00 00 02 06 06

07 00 05 00 76 51 28 83 83

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 2 9 10/1 10/2 11 12 20 21

55

58 01

1 10

06 01

0 0

56

00 04 06 06 02 08

00 55 07 58 53 09

0 0 0 0 0 0

5 6 15/2 16 17 24

62

76 07 01 82 58 58 26 07

00 06 01 05 06 06 01 06

3 4 7 8 13/2 18/1 23/1 23/2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

66

3 8

06 03

58 29

0 0

02 26 01 51 51 51 52 51 76 51

02 01 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00

133 137 145 175 176 185 189 548 552 565

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04201 4262 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—Sic 3(ii)j 4263 4264 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PAR I 11—SFC 1 (H) | 4265 : n "i i ii 2001 174266 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SKAVANA27,19X3 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 4267 4?dS THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SFC 3 (n)] 4269 4270 THE GAZETTEOF INDIA :ADGU5T1", 20015RAVANA 27,1923 |PART H—SEC. 3 (">] 4271 4272 TOE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II— SEC 3 (ii)] 42^1 2415 OI/2001 184274 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC 3 (n)] 4275 4276 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—Sue. 3 (ii)] 4277 4278 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2001

s.o.2071.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam in the State of Gujarat to Panipat in the State of Haryana via Chaksu in the State of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the " Augmentation of Viramgam- Chaksu, Chaksu-Panipat and Chaksu-Mathura sections of Salaya-Mathura Pipeline System";

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, arc made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under rhe land to Shri. Sunil Sharma Competent Authority, Salaya- Mathura Pipeline (Augunicntation) Project, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 33, Muktanand Nagar, Near (Jopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur (Rajasthan)4279

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Behror District: Alwar State : Rajasthan

Area

Khasara No.

N a me of Village

Sq. mtr. 5

Hectare 3

1

2

Are 4

Jainpurbas

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

884 883 881 814/2320 817 814 816 815 823 830 827 828 725 724 696 697 699 700 698 705 704 706 708 105 106 108 99 96 98

00 06 07 07 00 03 01 02 10 04 06 00 05 02 00 03 01 05 06 11 04 01 00 00 08 00 04 02 06

62 26 98 33 20 15 12 73 08 02 41 42 12 24 45 43 42 86 88 99 82 85 20 77 18 94 81 31 16 Gunti

2132 2106 2104 2047 2061 2064 2066

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

04 27 09 13 08 02 05

73 48 18 32 46 30 124280 THE GAZETTE OF i t o l A: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)J 1 5 I 01 96 45 47 38 64

4 08 00 04 08 06 02

3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 2065 2085 2072 2083 2080 2079

Shyampur

05 .08 00 02 04 08 02 07 01 01 08 04 00 06 05 02 00 09 03 03 02 08 01 00 03 03 06 00 03 04 00

51 17 44 70 15 76 90 27 84 05 14 32 20 03 63 57 21 43 97 93 50 06 92 25 80 29 35 20 75 80 48

403 401 399 400 394 393 392 242 241 243 244 254 245 253 252 263 264 161 164 283 284 159 154 156 155 152 134 135 133 132 131

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shimla

05 04 04 05 07 04 02 04

89 30 86 04 28 73 93 46

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

305 302 301 299 298 274 275 2764281 5 75 39 58 22 89 78 62 24 96 86 58 97 48 50 84 14 20 36 59 39

4 06 10 03 05 08 02 00 00 07 02 05 04 01 01 35 01 00 08 07 02

277 280 281 282 290 291 292 195 194 193 60 59 58 61 65 71 69 70 70/432 75

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gokalpur

20 08 34 70 16 74 43 84 85 80 53 66 50 55 56 49 78 14 55 30 52 02 86 76 61

00 03 05 08 09 03 01 04 00 03 02 06 05 04 00 01 05 03 03 00 03 04 02 00 02

592 594 627 626 624 623 622 621 641 647 646 645 644 662 652/760 658/739 657 653 197 198 196 194 185 182 183

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2415 (JI/2001 194282 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18.2001 SRAVANA 27.1923 (PART U—RKC. 3 (irtl 1 I + 07 oo

2 183/757 161 158

00

5 64 75 20 Momanpur

3 0 0 fl G 0

1432 1431 1429 1423 1426 225 226 227 228 229 234 237 238

Q 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

08 02 11 09 09 03 03 02 03 01 04 16 00

50 65 08 26 44 01 79 66 78 17 00 35 43 Sarvllandpura

1403 1377 1378

0 0 0

11 02 07

11 64 83 Talwad

1397

1396/1046

¹³⁹⁶m

188 180 272 271 256 255 254 222 223 224

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13 05 06 02 00 01 00 03 01 01 00 03 04 04

72 38 91 12 20 22 72 01 57 24 36 06 24 00 Jaguwas

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^

oJ

0 0 0

208 209 210 211 202 212 151 150 152 149 148

03 04 03 07 03 07 08 00 01 08 08

91 05 28 85 62 15 98 20 92 46 294283 1 1

2 1104

4 I 07 02 00 01 01 04 06 00 07 02 04 07 05 01 03 00 00 13 04 04 W S3

5 35 52 20 87 41 33 46 20 04 75 07 47 23 -39 51 50 30 26 52 35 86 93 15 81 08 74 43

03 07 04 00

105 106 100 99 107 98 101 93 90 69 88 82 83 81 84 79/93"! 78 74 61 63 64 65 66 67 68 69

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kalyanpura

10 06 05 11 04 00 04 04 00 03 07 06 01 07 00 03 09 03

73 75 04 98 84 28 21 53 33 58 52 89 51 91 37 47 61 59

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

503 502 501 500 494 493 492 491 490 542 539 536 53? 533 632 571 525 52442S4 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SFC 3 (n)] 1 I 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

I 4 J 03 00 00 01 07 02 02 07 02 04 08 02

5 66 83 20 92 24 06 03 69 75 91 12 66

523 522 522/685 586 587 588 589 591 618 600 599 603

Nanglarundh

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

293 286 287 222 223 224 221 232 231 235 236 237 239 238 245 246 278 275 315 317 77 76 74 42 43 44 62 61 46 47 48 53 52

00 03 04 09 00 04 00 05 06 02 00 02 04 02 06 03 00 00 21 07 28 02 26 29 01 12 13 01 24 25 06 20 02

66 52 95 63 20 81 20 25 16 86 62 64 62 17 66 69 66 20 92 70 99 26 62 81 60 76 09 76 42 85 49 74 644285 4 2 1 ¹ I J ³ L __$_ _ Hamjapur

49 94 05 39 02

03 05 06 05 06

0 0 0 0 0

1324 1326 1314 1311 1310

Bantkhani

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

227 226 225 208 206 205 192 187 188 186 163 156 165 154 151 133 138 140 36 37 40 51 50 62 63 64

07 01 06 07 12 00 14 07 03 04 06 04 01 08 00 04 09 08 06 06 01 07 09 00 06 00

14 86 88 35 91 35 63 48 23 73 77 46 74 10 20 48 30 91 38 66 23 12 68 77 77 20 Kolila Rabad

95 96 97 89 88 87 85 86 115 116 122 123 129

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

06 03 00 04 05 02 00 07 03 04 04 11 03

33 73 20 26 06 30 25 15 27 46 51 00 0842H6 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (u)]

2 ~ 1~

I 1 " "

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

00 00 10 08 05 07 01 01 13 00

128 130 137 138 151 150 149 148 146 147

5 20" 66 20 64 64 98 29 71 83 98 Kolila Sanga

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

464 468 466 521 522 527 528 565 564 563 612 613 615 621 620 637 638 639 640 641 664 675 293 678 292 292/776 291 282 276 275 272 248 249 252 251

14 14 00 01 03 08 07 04 06 00 00 05 05 05 00 00 05 02 07 02 07 09 02 01 06 04 00 01 06 06 07 13 00 20 02

54 55 20 79 53 98 45 37 17 54 20 25 94 95 20 56 65 70 15 67 45 19 72 54 77 84 69 26 44 49 59 20 20 74 86 4287 .

L ³ -

5 56 75 35 00 88 62 47 27

4 .. _i 07 06 00 08 04 08 05 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

I 2 239 240 236 237 233 232 231 210

Kolila Joga

64 17 50 43 20 61 75 84 65 32 00

00 07 08 07 00 07 02 04 08 00 09

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

20 19 18 16 9 10 11 12 4 2 3

Majrakath

19 16 09 04 00 06 14 06 00 05 05 05 12 03 01 05 04 08 00 01 06 01 00 08 01 08

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

48 67 65 02 32 26 60 94 34 51 09 39 49 69 54 01 57 38 27 77 71 54 43 03 76 75

207 224 236 237 238 239 241 410 411 412 413 407 392 384 383/772 383 380 378 372 371 369 276 277 360 359 3574288 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II— Sbc. 3 (ii)] 1 2 "T L ⁴ 354 355 359/785 353 351 352 343 344 341 339

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 45 "" 39 54 79 33 76 81 47 52 62

00 07 01 00 13 07 01 04 02 08

Kalipahari

90 91 92 93 89 85 79 77 70 69 64 63 58 57 56 52 51 37 34 33 32 31 30 29 26 25 24 23 22

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

07 04 05 13 00 06 06 06 01 06 04 03 08 07 06 06 16 01 11 03 02 02 02 02 00 02 03 02 05

48 58 32 01 20 13 35 82 76 60 07 85 36 15 27 22 94 47 74 96 44 42 27 64 44 50 00 81 06 Janakslnghpura

297 284 308 283/347 283 256

0 0 0 0 0 0

41 02 00 02 01 04

44 15 40 04 27 664289 1 I ⁴ I ⁵ I 2 _J258 260 261 240 239 238 237 235 234/341 236 234 229 227 165 199 198 171 175 188/339 188 178 181 183 152

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

15 16 04 02 00 04 01 11 02 00 00 06 02 10 10 05 18 03 00 04 11 12 07 03

51 50 68 70 81 09 17 26 66 20 20 44 15 15 77 29 43 49 20 01 68 73 65 29 Belani

484 487 346 343 344/517 344 345 328 330 284 285 281 270 268 260 257 255 254

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

09 08 05 00 00 06 07 17 04 06 10 04 10 16 18 19 00 08

68 64 05 49 20 85 25 65 09 41 50 92 17 50 17 77 65 96 Shahjahanpur

580 572 123

0 0 0

02 08 19

15 89 49 2 - H5 t il 2 0 01 204290 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II— SEC. 3 (ii)) 1 1

5 00 00 95 49 66 84 65 56 20 48 48 36 84 51 52 14 45 00 86 85

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

" " 2 . .. I 122 102 103 99 79 80 81 7B 76 68 71 70 32 31 26 16 15 16 14 19

4 20 06 05 06 10 04 02 D5 00 11 02 10 07 04 11 01 04 01 02 08

Sanseri

05 00 01 05 04 04 00 03 03 05 00 03 03 05 02 05 02 01 02 01 07 00 01 02 00

83 20 94 30 53 31 21 01 16 10 91 47 72 94 75 49 47 11 57 92 24 44 54 59 20

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1032 1033 1031 1034 1035 1036 1074 1041 1042 1040 1044 966 068 "67 933 935 936 938 S37 869 641 876 842 843 8364291 . 4___. _[ 5 37 96 06 20 06 31 86 55 82 30 25 40 99 39 33 82 47 29 63 20 91 34 64 51 64 69 71 25 68 25 20 29 50 93 05 63 21 22 28 49 11 90 54 14 31 59

04 04 08 00 06 00 02 03 03 04 04 04 03 01 01 00 02 05 04 00 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 00 03 09 00 00 01 01 02 02 03 00 00 00 01 01 03 03 03 02

3 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 846 847 848 Mln 849 Min 734 Min 748 747 737 738 722 709 710 695 697 698 684 685 680 669 670 659 654 649 645 507 505 504 503 502 494 495 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 399 398 397 396 392 391 390 3894292 TI IE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 |PARTII—Stc. 3 (n)] ² i_

L ¹

5 07 04 26 11 31

4 [_ 04 07 00 06 08

3 I 0 0 0 0 0

388 220 219 217 216

Jonayacha Khurd

20 43 74 78 37 65 67 70 06 15 25 72 52 08 85 68 73 20 28 99 81 04 34 39 20 20 20 57 31 30 50 05

00 04 03 02 07 01 02 13 05 03 00 00 06 03 03 09 01 00 05 09 07 02 10 04 00 00 00 05 01 03 00 07

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1303 1301 1298 1297 1296 1242 1241 1240 154 153 156 150 161 162 163 165 166/1895 167 170 169 128 118 119 120 111 18 20 21 22 23 24 25

Shriyani

74 22 09 09 20 37 45 62

04 00 05 03 00 04 00 04

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

661 660 662 652 656 653 651 6504293 1 L_ ² I 4 I 03 02 01 03 01 00

5 74 78 74 58 08 42

3 0 0 0 0 0 0

642 641 640 635 634 632

Gugalkota

20 68 01 63 12 44

00 05 07 10 01 08'

0 0 0 0 0 0

16 15 9 8 1 2

Kankar

58 61 91 20 20 77 55 74 30 15 82 11 22 51 09 89 02 21 24 02 75 28 92 28 75 74 04 20 32 00 35 99 25

08 04 03 00 04 06 17 13 16 06 00 06 04 09 03 02 05 03 02 02 00 00 04 00 00 03 06 07 03 05 10 03 03

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1097 1098 1099 1104 1103 1102 1112 1113 1115 931 929 928 926 874 875 876 877 880 881 884 863 898 885 886 895 862 861 859 351 352 353 836 8354294 THEGAZETTEOFINDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PARTII—SEC. 3 (ii)] 1 2

4 08 06 06 07 05 09 05 04 01 03 02 02 04 09 08 01 08

5 75 49 02 37 67 05 12 57 79 17 45 94 76 63 Q6 54 14

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

526 531 530 544 549 594 593 592 587 588 584 585 580 577 572 571 570

[No. R-25011/28/2001OR-I1

S. CHANDRASEKHAR, Under Secy4295 42% THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVAN A 27,1923 [PART II—Stc 3 (u)] 4297

241"; {,1/2001 21

-HOT

2415 GI/2001 224306 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART U—SEC 3 (iij]

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2001

S. o. 2O72.-Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of Cf tide Oil from Viramgam in the State of Gujarat to Panipat in the State of tiaryana via Chaksu in the State of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Augmentation of Viramgam - Chaksu, Chaksu - Panipat and Chaksu - Mathura sections of Salaya - Mathura Pipeline System";

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, *!$62 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user in the land described in the said Schedule;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days front the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, arc made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shrl Stmil Sharma, Competent Authority, Salaya- Mathura Pipeline (Augmentation) Project, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 33, IVIuktanand Nagar, Gopalpura ByePass, Jaipur-302 018.

SCHEDULE

Tehsll: KHARCHI

State : RAJASTHAN

District: PALI

Sq.mtr.

Khasara No.

Hectare

Name of the Village

2

Area Are 4

6

3

1

94

1651

0

27

DEOLI

1652

45

48

0

1654

40

0

51

1594

40

0

03

1595

40

0

01

1596

08

30

0

1597

0

00

20

1593

68

0

01

1592

0

20

04

1199

0

00

20

1200

0

10

34

1183

0

07

84

1183/1679

11

0

98

1176

0

16

37

1180

0

00

20

1177

0

02

99

1178

0

00

30

1179

0

07

62

1153/1

0

08

65

1153/2

0

07

66

1153

72

0

00

1152

0

00

20

1135

0

08

29

1143

0

04

50

1141

0

18

96

1136

0

00

20

1137

0

21

89

1104

0

28

42

1105

0

09

90

1101

0

02

11

1106

0

00

48

1100 •

0

21

24

1099

0

20

32

1069

0

05

66

1270

0

00

604108 THbCiAZETTEOFINDIA:AUGUST18,2001SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 1 I 2 6 95 I 3 | 0 1273 4 I 16 25 0 1277 76 34 82 0 1283 1282

1284

1050

1049

1043

1009

1010

1012

1013

1002

999

904

914

915

878

877

876

872

871

867

865

864

861

857

946

947

948

244 00

51 0

01

28 0

23

49 0

07

0

04 46

0

57 0

25

15 0

09

70 02

57 0

11

94 0

07

0

82 24

0

30 09

27 0

0

06

36 01

0

0

00

00

47 94 65 0

28

44 0

31

0

51 32

10 0

15

36 0

12

36 0

08

24 0

12

46 0

18 0

34 0

13 22

0

18

12 00

0

30 39

0

69 JETPURA

201

203

204

2iC

213

214

279

278

273 09

10 0

0

12

29 21

0

08 57

55 0

0

10

25 0

36

04 07

0

91 07

0

86 10

46 04309 I 2 1 4 | I 6 1 I r~3 i 17 KADU 13 20 01 01 15 221 222 175 172

162

169

166

167

165

150

151

148

129

114

108

113

112

109

110

111

52

51

53

30

29

28

18

17

16

14

12

13

4

3

678 GURA KESHAR SINGH

679

680

681 MIN

681/2

681/3

84 34

36 19

06 09

0 0 0 0 0 0

14

83 0

86 0

00

20 0

00

80 13

0

65 08

0

74 11

0

13 36

0

20 00

0

40 0

00

53 12

0

03

31 0

32 15

0

20 00

0

59 0

20

88 02

0

78 09

0

86 05

0

68 09

0

48 23

0

91 0

03

94 0

11

11

84 0

00 09

0

35 02

0

59 02

0

87 0

10

12 0

11

11

43 0

13 03

0

70 0

10

11

63 0

65 0

01

06

0

05

0

13 254110 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 |PARI II—Sue. 3 (ii)l I 2 I 4 |, 2386 05 5 23 JATIYON Kl DHANI 2357 46 05 2348 22 96 2347

2346

2345

1268

1263

1264

1260

1261

1255

1221

1215

247 32

02

69 06

39 20

13 13

38 06

03

50

I 3 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12

35 03

23

18 13

10

91 03

71 14

57 ANGDOSH

246

248

249

370

366 344

340

342

306

307

337

309 334

327

328

2

273 00

20

10 17

04

84

81 19

22 11

21

06

39

72 99 37 69 03

02

33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

00

20 29

33

51 73 47 09

03

10 12

0 0 0 0 0 0

0

RADAWAS

GADANA

275

276

312

309

308

307

282 284

39 97 63 05 11

0

94 11

0

29 0

03

05

56 0

35 05

0

80 06

0

71 39

0

07

21 04311 1 I 2 3 0 5 12 285 4 11 09 0 06 286 287 00 0 80 288

233

232

189

194

198

199

205

202

217

216

151

149

150

15

43

40

39

60

354 RANAWAS

356

353

347

346

345

343

344

337

340

339

385

386

394/882

390

39

38

37 0

13

59 03

0

60 13

0

39 03

0

45 28

0

21 02

0

88 01

0

85 25

0

81 01

0

91 0

31

40 0

97 19

30

0

89 0

00

20 0

41

90 0

71 03

0

06

80 27

0

39 20

90 0

0

22

14 0

11

01 0

20 00

00

0

90 0

09

23 0

04

94 0

05

77 07

52 0

44 0

08

0

78 09

0

38 06

47 0

09

0

88 09

74 0

05

0

80 02

28 0

13

0

24 06

0

87 11

0

32 004112 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PARr II—SEC. 3 (ii)| 1 I 2 40 I 4 | 05 I 3 | 0 5 25 54 06 47 0 53 07 0 80 52

51

49

101

102

104

277 0

09

06 08

0

32 07

0

50 19

0

15 02

0

20 0

52 15 11

0

96 BARI

275

274

269/1

264

263

262 71

66

72

73 74

63

60

58

59

57

53

26

25

17

1

16

12

2

3

87 11

33 0

01

0

42 01

54 0

09

91 0

00

0

20 03

0

35 0

09

78 07

0

46 26

0

77 17

25 0

0

05

79 0

55 - 10

0

28

06 14

93 0

00

20 0

10

23 0

27

0

54 14

93 0

21

05 0

00

31 0

19

05 0

02

83 0

06

0

36

0

02

44 29 06 0

0

12

37 GOPAWAS

110 109 107

104 25

44 0

41

60 0

25

95 0

23

89 04313 1 I 3 5 26 2 60 150

41 NIMBLI (MANDA)

149

148

147

137

134

130

133

15

23

28 27

26

53

52

55

58

59

60

1009

42

82 0 0 0 0

24 4 02 14 22 07 15 67

13

12 0 0 0

41 04 21

0 0

28

93 0

01

96

25 08

0

02

48 0

93 05

0

96 37 08 12

74 00

0 0 0

07 02

0

93 09

0

36 12

0

20 00

0

37 00

0

MANDA

1012

1008

1023

1024

1026

1029

1119

1118

1136

1117

1137

1138

1110

1109

1094

1095

1086

1084 2 ITS GI 200 I 21

70 30

0

25 19

0

74 0

11

01

85 0

97 19

0

25 12

0

96 08

0

95 25

0

20 00

0

20 00

0

00 13

0

65 0

08 29

71 0

44 30

0

23 28

0

17 20

0

47 18

0

28 00

04314 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA 27,192J [PART H^-SEC. 3 (ii)] & * I 1 I I 2 I. 3 I 1204 57 0 20 1237 0 29 36

1233

0

33

90 0

1286

71

10

1285

0

11

53

1284

0

38

51

1283

0

27

76

1313

0

07

82

1314

0

15

81

1315

812

801

802

804

805

806

799

733

735

763

762

761

229 0

05

15 0' 20

18 0

08

67 0

22

86 0

00

20 0

12

60 0

11

78 0

01

96 0

1&

29 0

21

64 0

36

96 0

00

78

29 0

32

04

63 0'

HAMEERWAS

228

227

226

225

224

223

222

220

219

307 0

10

91 0

01

34

67 0

14

0

03

60 0

10

78 0

08

49 0

13

51 0

26

25 0

01

49

57 0

02

RAJOLAKHURD

308

309Min

304

303

296-

297

04

0

76 0

26

64 0

16

34

01

03 0

07

34 0

07

08 04315 1 I 2 | I 5 I" ⁴ I 27 44 r³ !0 271 20 0 00 270 23 12 273 0 274

241

230

252

231

224

223Min

218Min

216

215

346

345

208

206

197

197/1

198/1

198Min

195

194

190

376

38 04

85 33

0 0

13 0

46 38 07

0

00

20 0

87 0

10

59 0

42

74 0

21

00

20 0

08

20 0

24 24

0

17 0

03

18

28 0

73 0

16 03

0

35 13

51 0

12

0

36 13

31 0

04

0

32 36

0

16

45 0

0

18 02 13

KANTALIYA

375

374

373

18

17

13

12

5

6

111 Min

112

115

259 19

91 0

0

37 11

04 31

0

23

0

95

67 19

0

09

0

76 0

69 01

0

58 39

0

44 12

0

27 0

06 29 82 17

0

09 0

12 11

BORNADI

256

74 0

484116 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 IPART II—Stc 3 (ii)l I 2 I 4 | I 3 13 90 0 262 255 0 03 09 263 16 0 37 133

148

134

142

143

141

140

139 0

02

68

52

0

64

00

0

71

13

0

05

00

0

35

11

0

69

0

13

40

38

35

0

GUDANGARI

51

57

71

67

77

75

76

81

93

94

100 101

103

102

107 0

56

0

38 00 20

35

0

28

0

26

37

04

0

89

30

0

68

0

00

94

0

09

49

36

0

0

04

46 70 0

69

26 17

0

0

00

50 20 0

18

56

02

0

74

[No. R-25011/27/2001OR-I] S. CHANDRASEKHAR, Under Secy.

24TS GI 2001 24H22 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA_ AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PARTII—SEC. 3 (h)] 4323 4324 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 |PARTII—SEC. 3 (u)] 4325 4326 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] 4127

New Delhi, the 9th August. 2(K) 1

S. O. 2073.—Whereas, it appears to t he Central Government, that it is n e c e s s a ry in

the public Interest that for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam in

the State of Gujarat to Panipat in the State of Haryana via Chaksu in the State

of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for

implementing the "Augmentation of Viramgam - Chaksu, Chaksu - Panipat and

Chaksu - Mathura s e c t i o ns of Salaya - Mathura Pipeline System".

And, w h e r e a s, It appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of

laying s u ch pipeline, It is n e c e s s a ry to acquire the right of user in the land

under which the said pipeline Is proposed to be laid and which is described in

the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in e x e r c i se of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of

section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User

* in Land) Act, 1 9 62 (50 of 1962), t he Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire t he right of user therein;

Any person interested In the land described in the said Schedule may, within

twenty one days from the date on which the c o p i es of this notification, as

published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public,

object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the

pipeline under t he land to Shrl Sunil Sharma, Competent Authority, Salaya

Mathura Pipeline Augmentation Project, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 33,

Muktanand Nagar, Gopal Pura Byepass, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302 0 1 8.

-H28 _ _ 7ITEGA7ETTEOF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923

SCHEDULE

District PALI Tehsil : DESURI

Name of the Village

Khasara No

1

2

411 BAROD

412

413

422

421

420

414

415

416

417

392

393

395

335

329

328

327

284

285

286

271

261

262

263

260

259

258

257

87

85

26

28

356 UNDARTHAL

353

349

|PARI IT—Su 3 (u)] RAJASTHAN

State :

Area

Are Sq.mtr. ¹ Hectare

5

4

3 0

00

20

02

08

0

0

05

96

0

00

20

0

00

83

0

02

55

37

0

01

0

06

85

0

08

68

0

00

20

0

04

35

24

0

18

0

02

21

0

11

10

0

09

09

0

12

49

0

10

73

0

11

70

0

08

82

0

13

47

0

15

04

0

15

78

04

64

0

24

0

00

07

0

05

06

80

0

0

08

03

0

07

19

17

0

71

0

12

17

54

0

30

0

30

55

0

57

89

0

11

15

0

06

984329 4 5 1 2 77 02 347 ! 3 0 345

342

341

334

333

144

139

140

136

133

131

129

124

120

44 11

0

96 13

0

84 03

0

0

78 08

92 06

0

98 0 n

76 06

0

0

71 05

0

68 10

76 04

0

04

55 0

10

0

98

34 18

0

32 21

0

87 07

0

115/394

115

96

95

94

105

07 11

0

0

28 01

47 01

0

00

0

53

88 18

0

PADAMPURA

104

100

97

96

92

87

88

86

80

78

75

74

72

71

70

69

68

63 24)5 CU 200 I 25

32 31

0

0

04 12

68 06

0

0

09 20

60 0

21

76 19

0

97 01

0

28

45 0 0

76 07

77 07

0

0

38 05

20 00

0

0

86 02

12 04

0

03

0

19 0

61 03

02

0

86

48 00

04330 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PARFII—SEC. 3 (ii)] 1 429 3 0 4 02 DHALOP 11 364 0 73 28 0 363 15 362

291

68 97 17

0

0

76 01

KOTADI

292

308/910

308/911

316

332

344

342

346

114

116

121

128

137

141

397

396

395

398

4490 24

0

50 16

0

03

0

97 77 42 04

0

12

0

68 00

0

58 29

90 0

11

0

30

0

0

46 88 17 20

00 18

0

0

50

12 03

0

73 57 24

0

06

63 0

08

19 0

11

0

46 21

0

07

0

00 02 NADOL

4489

4494

4491

4492

4496

4497

4503

4514

4515

4511

4519

4510

4093

4091

4589

4521 00

0

20

54 00

0

81 24

0

19

63 0

57 0

06

97 13

0

03

0

25 00

64 0

22

34 0

11 13

0

84 08

0

00

48 0

54 07

0

77 03

0

16

54 0

00 12

0 •mi1 2 4 16 5 61 3 0 4583 07 65 4579 4657

4655

4667

4666

4663

4668

4684

4685

4683

4688

3836

3801

3800

3807

3808

3809

3810

3787

3811

3482

3483

3484

3486

3490

3485

3461

3464

3458

3292

3288

3281

3283/5568/1 3283

3282

3283/5568/5848 3259

78

13

0 0

00

13

00

22

0 0

73

00

0

29

18

0

00

20

0

07

76

0

73

10

0

37

00

0

33

02

0

88

01

0

11

49

0

65

08

0

0

00

99

56

0

14

03

64

0

0

66

23

0

00

0

20 57

15

66

0

26

0

08

97

06

96

0

19

0

65

00

0

20

24

0

06

04

0

29

21

0

03

22

er

0 0

00

20

19

0

28

0

00

48

02

0

82

0

05

46

07

0

93

0

07

13

0

14

15

3347

32S8

00

0

23

00

0

464 ^2 I MF GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18 21 SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PARI II—Sir 1 (ii)l 4 5 1 2 43 50 GURA KESAR SINGH • 09 44 09 45 3 0 0 0

00

44

08

08

0

43

01

37

04

0

13

73

14

13

0

50

127

00

0

JIWAND KHURD

0

20

128/429

00

129

31

01

92

33

30

0 0

07

82

0

04

79

79

19

0

0

78

82

19

0

100

52

00

32

61

0

39

33

17

55

38

20

63

0 0

41

0

94

07

39

00

20

0

0

25

68

05

209

01

70

0

40

0

77

222

11

91

0

223

221

17

73

0

0

39

215

08

0

215/2

20

50

216/1

0

00

66

216

00

20

0

BORDI

0

626

59

05

0

73

15

632 617

0

53

23

613

0

29

68

333

0

39

53

271

06

29

277

0 0

40

49

110

11

10

0

111

15

0

51

49

112

20

0

0

113

36

18

100

06

89

04333 3 4 5 26 30 1 2 99 98 41 0 0 31 95 0 10 33 94

92

42

40

38

37

36

190

88 32

0

02 01

0

67 07

69 14

26 0 0 0

13

80 08

04

12 0 0

86 23

BOLAKURA

189

196

195

203

205

206

208

209

319

317

316

311

313

294

293

283

235 0

0

94 09

73 0

01

07

85 0

85 0

33

27 08

0

0

02 10

02 0

18

02

69 0

0

85 06

77 25

0

0

33 21

24

42 0

17

99 0

20 0

00

12 0

28

48 0

13

0

23

GHENRI

234

234/850

234/851

217

216

209

210

211

194

197

200

183

86 0

30 01

11 04

51 13

0 0

87 0

02

0

04

39 48 10

0

0

16

78 03

42 0

95 22

0

0

21

13 0

24

02 0

19

334134 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II— SLC. 3 (ii)] 3 1 2 5 27 182/3 0 4 02 182/2 0 05 95 187 0 14 98 154

157

28

27

25

32

38

44

45

46

47

48

822 0

21

09 0

04

49 0

10

22 0

01

13 0

20

58 0

08

40 0

19

36 0

22

40 11

0

96 0

05

33 0

12

35 0

02

40 0

00

21 PILOWANI

823

858

859

860

876/1

876/2

876/3

876

874/1

874/2

874/3

874/4

874/5

874

875/1

875/2

875

877

245 0

12

73 0

06

05 0

06

57 0

08

58 0

03

43 0

02

55 0

02

88 0

00

65 0

00

20 0

00

20 0

00

63 0

00

95 0

01

32 0

06

50 0

01

40 0

01

62 0

06

22 0

07 11

0

27

SIWAS

244

243

242

241/806

42 0

44

46 0

15

88 0

08

20 0

05

804335 : 4 3 1 2 5 24 06 0 241 14 22 238 0 77 237 05 0 236

33

39

45

44

43

49

21

20

81

80

83

84

89'

90

92

96

170 04

65 0

13 05

0

71 11

0

31 23

0

00

38 0

13

08 0

04

44 0

53 16

0

37 53

0

52 0

1.1

47 17

0

14

84 0

11 27

0

07

21 0

00

0

20 01

0

33 01

0

25 07

0

46 GURA DOLJI

138

141

142

124

121

120

119

118

117 12

0

12 29

00 d

04

0

16 05

0

32 07

36 0

28 10

0

12

22 0

04

97 0

05

0

64 KHIWARA

176

172

181

171

170

184

168

167 40

0

12

74 08

0

07

32 0

09 01

0

76 0

02

10 0

40

14

66 0

- 29

20 04116 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18 200 1 SRAVANA 27,1923 [PAR I II—SEC 3 (n)] 3 1 ! 2 4 5 167/1397 0 03 70 166 0 35 05 0 04 10 165 197

196

198

202

203

204

205

206

207

209

208

151

108

109

100

99

99/1409

79

80

83

76

43

42

04 0

14

0

20

00

0

11

57 0

15

08

07

80 0

87 0

07

07

71 0

0

08

06 0

05

95 0

13

26 0

00

20 0

20

40 0

13

39 0

04

42 0

19

80 0

81

15

0

13

01 0

13

92 0

14

56 0

03

25 0

19

20

07

11 0

0

10

11 [No R-2.W11/29/2001 OR-I1 S CHANDRASEKHAR, Under Secy AVH 2415 GI/2001 - 264338 THEGAZETTEOFINDIA: AUGUST 18,200LSRAVANA27,1923 [PARTII—SEC. 3 (ii))

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2001

s. o. 2074.— Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of crude oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh, the pipeline should be laid by the Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of users in the lands described in the Schedule annexed to thia notification;

Now, therefore, In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (I) of the section 3 of the Petroleurp ~and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of tyt6 Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50'of 1962 ), the Cehtral Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the Land to Shri Deepak Deahpande, the" Competent Authority, Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, A-Block, BPCL Office, Office Complex, Gautam Nagar, Bhopal - 462 023, Madhya Pradesh.

st in ni i.n

Slate : Madhya Pradesh

Name of village

Survey N".

District

Tdutt

Sr. No.

Area Hecran/ Are 6

1

4

5

3

2

i

0 225

6^6

Khaiuri

Rajgaih

Rajparh

0 040

197

Makdawan

Ujjam

Badnagar

Z

0 0

<<2O

OuKali

larftnn

0810

303

Ghatiya

Meen

97

0 080

Ralayata Hcwat

[No. R-25027/1/2000 OR-II] HAR1SH KUMAR, Under Secy4339 4340 _ THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001 SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi, the 16th August, 2001

S. O. 2075.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of

Petroleum and Natural Oas number 3.O. 818 dated the 20th April 2001 issued under

sub- section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of

Right of User In Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act)

the Central Government declared Its Intention to acquire the right of user in the

lands specified In the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying pipeline for the transport of petroleum products from Chennai to Madural via

Tlruchlrapalll In the State of Tamil Nadu by Petronot CTM Limited ;

And whereas, copies of the said notifications were made available to the public

on 8-5-2001;

And whereas, the Competent Authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the

said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report Is satisfied

that the right of user In the land specified in the Schedule appended to this

Notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of

the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user In the

lands specified in the Schedule appended to this notification are hereby acquired;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the

said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user In the said

land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of

publication of this declaration, In the Petronet CTM Limited free from all

encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

State :

Tamil Nadu

District

Tiruvallur

Taluk : Tiruvallur

Area

A ie

o Sub-Qivision no

| Sq rnti

Survey n

Hectare

Name of the Vi lage

3

5

2

4

¹

_J _J2

-

11

0

22

No.87 VEPPAMBATTU

19

06

0

60

20

01

0

30

2^

03

60

20

2A1A3B

p

64

2A1A3A

0

20

20

[No R-31015/18/2000OR-I1 S CHANDRASEKHAR, Under Secy4341 4342 THE GAZETTE OFINDIA: AUGUST 18,2001/SRAVANA27,1923 (.PART II—SEC. 3(ii)J

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S. O. 2076.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprevaJjjf Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render its accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of dispensing pump (dual cabinet type with 2 pumping units) with digital display (hereinafter referred to as the Model), and of "G 2003 P" series with brand name "Century G 2000" manufactured by M/s Teletcch Instrumentation Private Limited, 28/48, Kharadi, Off NagarRoad, Pune-411 014 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/01/06;

The model is a dispensing pump with digital indication having maximum flow rate 90 litres per minute. The minimum flow rate is 5 litres per minute. The graduation interval is 10ml. The display unit is of Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) type The instrument operates on 220 volts and50 hertz single phase or 420 Volts, 50 Hertz three phase, alternate current power supply. It has preset facility to deliver fuel by money value or volume. It is used for dispensing petrol, diesel, Kerosene and Mineral turbine oil.

[ENo.WM-21(125)/98]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4343 4344 THEGAZETTEOFINDIAAUGUST18,2001/SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S. O. 2077.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top counter scale type) with digital indication (hereinafter referred to as the model) of 'TTCS' series belonging to Medium accuracy class (accuracy class III) and with with brand name "WEIGH MASTER", manufactured by M/s Jain Electronic & Weighing Instrument Co., U/22, Akshganga Complex, Main Road, Mango, Jamshcdpur, Jharkhand Stalc-831 012, and which is assigned the approval markIND/09/00/252,

The model is a non-automatic weighing instrument (table top counter scale type) with digital indication of maximum capacity 12 kg, minimum capacity 20 g. The value of verification scale interval (e) is 1 gupto 6 kg and 2 g in the range of 6 kg to 12 kg The display unit is of light emitting diode. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply

Further, in exrccise of the power conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of (lie said Act, the Central Government hcrebs declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instalments of similar make, accuracv and performance of same scries with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale inlcr\al(n) m the range 100 to 10,000 for V value in the range 100 mg to 2 g and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range 500 to 10.000 for 'c' value more than 5 g and with 'e' value to 1 * 10\ 2* l()k and 5 * 10\ kbeing a positive or negam e whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F No WM-21(95)/99]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4345 2435 G1/2001— 274346 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. AUGUST IB, 2001/SRAVANA 27,1923 (PART II—SEC 3(n)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S. O. 2078.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report Submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied thai. Vnc model described in the said report (sec figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under \ aned conditions,

Now, therefore, m exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instruments (Table top type) with digital indication (hereinafter referred to as the model) of "ITS'series belonging to high accuracy class (accuracy class II) and with brand name "WEIGH MASTER", manufactured by M/s Jain Electronic & Weighing Instrument Co , U/22, Akshgjnqa Complex, Main Road, Mango, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand Siale-831 012, and which is assigned the appro\;il mark INP'09 HO/253,

The model is a non-automatic weighing irtstruniem \vA-' top type) with digital indication of maximum capacity 10 kg, minimum capacity 50 g. The value of verification scale interval (c) is 1 g. The display unit is of light emitting diods. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply

Further, in exrccise of the power conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval Of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity ,.,-Lo ^< kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range 100 to 1,00,000 for 'e' value 1 mg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range 5000 to 1,00,000 for V value of 100 mg or more with 'c' value to 1 * 10k, 2* 10" and 5* 10", k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model have been manufactured.

LFNo.WM-21(95)/99)

P. A KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4347 4348 THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,2001/SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S. O. 2079.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (sec figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrumcns (Platform type) with digital indication (hereinafter referred to as the model) of 'PFS' scries belonging to Medium accuracy class (accuracy class III) and with brand name "WEIGH MASTER", manufactured by M/s. Jain Electronic & Weighing Instrument Co , U/22, Akshganga Complex, Main Road, Mango, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand Statc-831- 012, and which is assigned the approval markIND/09/00/251,

The model is a non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of maximum capacity 120 kg, minimum capacity 200 g. The value of verification scale interval (c) is 10 g upto 60 kg and 20 g in the range of 60 kg to 120 kg. The display unit is of light emitting diode. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-secuon (12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 5 tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range 100 to 10,000 for 'c'value 100 ing to 2 g. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range 500 to 10,000 for 'c' value of 5 g or moreand with V value to lxl(),2><10,and5x 10, wherek isancgative orpositivc whole number or zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model have been manufactured.

[F No. WM-21(95)/99]

P. A. KRiSHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology ___43494350 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2080.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conforimity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, dual range (Table lop type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "RL" series of Medium accuracy (Accuracys class III) and with brand name "FS" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. F 16 Systcch India Ltd., 404, Rimsan Industrial Estate, Chinchoti Bundar Road Extension, Malad(W) Mumbai-400064 and which is assigned the approval markIND/09/2001/30;

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument (dual range) with a maximum capacity of 12 Kg. and minimum capacity of 20g. The verification scale interval value (e) is lg. upto 6 kg. and 2g. above 6 kg. upto 12 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operate 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternative current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same scries with maximum capacity upto 50 kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for 'e' value of lOOmg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval(n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for 'e'value of 5g. or more and with 'c'value 1x10 k, 2x10 k, 5x10 k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same material with which, the approval model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-2I(157)/2OO0]

P A KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4351 4352 THE_GAZETTE OF INDIA . AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 |PAKI II—Srr. 3(n)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2081.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1967 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, dual range (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "P.M." series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name "FS" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s F 16 Systceh India Ltd , 404, Riinsan Industrial Estate, Chinchoti BundarRoad Extension, Malad(W) Mumbai-400064 arid which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2001/31

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument (dual range) with a maximum capacity of 60 Kg. and minimum capacity of lOOg. The verification scale interval value (e) is 5g upto 30 kg and lOg above 30 kg upto 60 kg It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractivc retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result The instalment operater on 230 volts and 50-Hert7 alternative current power supply, Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for 'e' value of lOOmg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval(n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for V value of 5g or more and with 'en value lxlOk, 2x1 ()k, 5xI0k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same materials with which, the approved model have been manufactured

[F No WM-21(157)/2000]

P A KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology # 53 2435 GI/2001—284 - *^ THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 20O1/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)l

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2082.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in confimity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Platfrom type) weighing instrument (dual range) with digital indication of "PM" scries of Medium accuracy class (Accuracys HI) and with brand name "FS" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. F "6 Systech India Ltd , 404, Rimsen Industrial Estate, Chinchoti, Bundar Road Extension, Malad(W) Mumbai-400064 and which is assigned the approval mark 1ND/09/2001/12

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument (dual range) with a maximum capacity of 12 kg. and minimum capacity of 200g. The verification scale interval (e) value is lOg upto 60 kg and 20 g upto 120 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-secuon (12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 5000 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for V value of 5g or more and with c¹ value l*10\ 2*10\ 5*10\k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same material with which, the approval model have been manufactured.

IF No. WM-21(157)/20OOJ

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4355 4356 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC 3(ii)]

i\ew ueini, inc Jra August, zwi

S.O. 2083.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of automatic filling machine (dosing pump) DI-AG scries (hereinafter referred to as the model), with brand name "Superseal" manufactured by M/s Desbmukh Industries, Bhosalc-Pagariya Complex (Dilasa Place), Gavhane Vasti, (Bhosari), Punc-411039 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2001/42.

The said model is automatic filling machine (dosing pump of DI-AG series). The ranges to be covered under this model is from 5g to 500g or of equivalent volume. Its output is 40-50 pouches per minute. It packs lime, jam, jelly, paste, grease, shikand etc It operates on single phase 230 volts and 50-Hz

[F.No. WM-21(21)/2001]

P A KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4357 4358 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2084.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of a mechanical counter machine with brand name "1 KON S ANTRO" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Jay Shankar Scale Co., Mangrolrya Wadi, Vishvvakarma Nagar, Nr. Shivaji Nagar, Savarkundla-364515 (Gujarat), and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2000/308;

The said model (see the figure) is a Machamcal counter machine. Its maximum capacity is 10 kg Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same scries with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and manufactured by the sumc manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM-21(193)/2OOO]

P. A KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4359 4360 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PARI II—SEC 3(ii)J

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2085.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to H by the prescribed authority, is satisfied Lhat the model described in the said report (see figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Table lop type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "CA" series of Special accuracy (Accuracy Class I) and with brand name "CONTECH" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s Contech Instrument Company, Plot No EL 221, M I D.C. Electronic Zone, MHAPE, Navi Mumbai-400701 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2001/7,

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120 g and minimum capacity of lOOmg The verification scale interval value (e) is I mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractivc retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result The instrument operates on 230 volts and frequency 50-Hcrtz alternative current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said Section, Ihc Ccnlral Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number u[\ cnfication scale interval (n) equal toOTfriorc than 50.000 for 'e'value of equal to or more than Img and with V value Ix 10l\ 2v IO\ 5" 10\ k being the positive orT£ga l've whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufactuicr in accordance with the same principle, dSSigti .ind with the same material with which, the approval model have been manufactured

IF No WM-21(197)/2()()()|

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4361 2435 G1/2001—294362 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SBC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2086.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 to 1976) and the Standard of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CT series of High accuracy (Accuracy Class II) and with brand name "CONTECH" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Contech Instrument Company Plot No. EL. 221, M.I.D.C. electronic Zone, MHAPE, Navi Mumbai-400701 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2001/8.

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 122 KG and minimum capacity of lOOg. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and frequency 50-Hcrtz alternative current power supply,

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (12) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 1,00,000 for 'e' value of lmg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for V value of 100 mg or more and with 'c' value l"10k, 2><10k, 5xl0v, kbeing the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same material with which, the approval model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21(197)/2000]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4363 4364 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2087.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standard of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models)Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accrate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate pf approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Bench Scale type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "CP" series of High accuracy (Accuracy class II) and with brand name "CONTECH" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Contech Instrument Company Plot No. EL. 221, M.I.D.C electronic Zone, MHAPE, Navi Mumbai-400701 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2001/9.

The said model (with figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 22 Kg and minimum capacity of lOOg. The verification scale interval (e)is2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternative current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval orthe Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100000 for V value of ling to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for the 'e¹ value of lOOmg or more and with 'c' value lxl0k, 2x10 , 5x10, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same material with which, the approval model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21(197)/2000]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4365 4366 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18,2001/SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2088.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to ifc-by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate pf approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "CP" series of High accuracy (Accuracy class II) and with brand name "CONTECH" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Contech Instrument Company, Plot No. EL-221, M I D C. Electronic Zone, MHAPE, Navi Mumbai-400701 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2001/10.

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120kg and minimum capacity of 500g. The verification scale interval (c) is lOg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtracUvc retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result The instrument operates on 230 Volts and frequency 50-Hcrtz alternate current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of the said section, the Central Govcrnmen. hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 5000kg and number of verification scale interval (n) in the rangeof5000to l,00,OOOfor 'e'value of lOOmg or more and with'e'value l*10k, 2*10k, 5*10k,kbcing the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approval model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21(197)/2000]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4367 4368 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2089.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "CT" series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy Class III) and with brand name "CONTECH'' (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s, Contech Instrument Company, Plot No EL-221, MI D C, Electronic Zone, MHAPE, Navi Mumbai-400701 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2001/11.

The said model (in the figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 12 kg and minimum capacity of 40g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g, It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and frequency 50-Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of the said section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for 'e' value of lOOmg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval (n)inthe range of500 to 10,000 for e'value of 5g or more and with** value 1*10 ,2*10 , 5><10, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same maw^cturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same materials with which, the approved modei lijwcbeen manufactured.

[F.No. WM-21(197)/2000]

P. A. KR1SHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4369 2435 G1/2001—304370_ THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18,200I7SRAVANA27,1923 [PARTII—Suc.3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O- 2090.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Bench scale lop type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "CP" series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy Class III) and with brand name "CONTECH" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Contech Instrument Company, Plot No. EL-221, M.I.D.C, Electronic Zone, MHAPE, Navi Mumbai-400701 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2001/12;

The said model (in the figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 35 kg and minimum capacity of lOOg. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained lare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and frequency 50-Hertz alternative current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and accuracy performance of same scries with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for 'e' value of 100 mg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for 'e' value of 5g or more and with Le' value 1x10*, 2*10k, 5x10", kbcing the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same materials with which, the approved model have been manufactured.

[F. No.WM-21(197)/2000] P. A. KRISHNAMOOKTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4371 4372 THEGAZETrEOFINDIA:AUGUST18,2001/SRAVANA27,1923 |PART11—Suc.3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2091.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now. therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Plat form type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "CP" series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name "CONTECH" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Contech Instrument Company, Plot No EL-221, M.I.D.C, electronic Zone, MHAPE, Navi Mumbai-400 701 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2001/13;

The said model (in the figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120 kg and minimum capacity of 400g. The verification scale interval (e) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractivc retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and frequency 50-Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of the said section 36 of the said Act the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 5000 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for 'e¹ value of 5g or more and with 'e' value 1* 10\ 2*10", 5*10\ k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same materials with which, the approved model have been manufactured.

[F.No.WM-21(197)/2000] P. A. KRISHNAMOOPTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4373 4374 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001/SRAVANA27,1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2092.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non-automatic, weighing instrument (table top type) belonging to high accuracy (Accurcy Class II) of 'DS-852-J' series with brand name 'ESSAE-DIGI' (herein referred to as the model) manufactured by M/s. Essae-Teraoka Limited, 377/22, 6th Cross Wilson Garden, Bangalore- 560027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2001/28,

The said model (the figure given) is non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type). The maximum capacity is 600g. and minimum capacity 200 mg The value verification scale interval (c) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractivc retained tare effect. The load receptor is of square section of side 110 mm The vacuum Flourscent Display (VFD) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts, 50-Hertz alternative current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,0000 for 'c' value of lmg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range 5000 to 100000 for 'c' value of 100 mg or more and with 'c' value of lxiok, 2*10" and 5*10\ k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same materials with which, the approved model have been manufactured

fF.No WM-21(6)/2OO1J P A KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4375 -H76 _ THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 18,2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PARTII—SEC 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2(K) 1

S.O. 2093.—Whereas ihc Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act. 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules. 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain us accuracy over periods of sustained use and to measures render accurate service under varied conditions.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "NOVATJ" scries of High accuracy (Accuracy Class II) and with brand name "NOVA" (hereinafter referred to as the Model), manufactured by M/s. Nova Scales, 273, N G O Colony, Nagamali. Madurai-652548 and which is assigned the approval mark 1ND/09/2001/25,

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 200 g and minimum capacity of 200 ing The verification scale interval (e) is 10 mg It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtraciivc retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50-Hcrt? alternative current power supply,

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,0000 for V value of I mg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for 'e¹ value of 100 mg or more and with 'e' value lx10k, 2*10\ and 5x10", k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same material with which, the approved model have been manufactured.

[F.No WM-21(8)/2001] P A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4377 2435 GI/2001— 314378 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27,1923 (PART II—SEC. 3(ii)l

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2094.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "NOVA-TT" series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name "NOVA" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Nova Scales, 273, N.G.O. Colony. Nagmali, Madurai-652548 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2001/26.

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of lOOg. The verification scale interval value (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternative current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10.000 for 'e' value of lOOmg to 2g and with number of verification scale inierval(n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for "c' value of 5g or more and with 'e' value l*10k, 2x10", 5*10", k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same material with which, the approved model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21(8)/2001] P A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4379 4380 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II-—SEC 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

SyO. 2095.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in confitrmity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standard of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Platform lypc) weighing instrument with digital indication of "NOVA-PT" scries of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name "NOVA" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Nova Scales, 273, N.G.O. Colony. Nagamali. Madurai-652548 and which is assigned the approval mark 1ND/09/2001/27.

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120 kg and minimum capacity of 400g. The verification scale interval value (e) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operate on 230 volts and 50-Hcrt/. alternative current power suoolv:

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of section 16 of the said Acl. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity uplo 51MX) kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 1O.(M)O for e' 5g or more and with c' value 1x 10l, 2* 10\ 5* 10\ k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same material with which, the approved model have been manufactured.

IF. No. WM-21(8)/2001] P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology4381 4382 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3 rd August, 2001

S.O. 2096.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in confirmity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain Us accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "IWT" scries of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name "INDUS" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Indus Weighing Systems Pvt Ltd, I00-B, Nehru Nagar, Coimbatorc-641 035 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2001/49.

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 10 kg and minimum capacity of 40g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect, The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operate on 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for 'e' value of lOOmg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval(n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for c' value of 5g or more and with 'e' value l><10\ 2X10"¹, S^lfr, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same materials with which, the approved model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21(27)/2001]

P A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology ^43834184 THE GAZETTEOFINDIA_AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA27, 1923 [PARFII—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2001

S.O. 2097.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in confirmity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, (Plateform t>pc) weighing instrument with digital indication of "IWP" scries of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name "INDUS" (hereinafter referred to as the model), manufactured by M/s. Indus Weighing Systems Pvt Ltd, 100- B, Nehru Nagar, Coimbatorc-641 035 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2001/50.

The said model (figure given) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 100 kg and minimum capacity of 400kg. The verification scale interval value (c) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractivc retained tare effect The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operate on 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternative current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same scries with maximum capacity upto 5 tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for Lc' value of 5g or more with'c' value l><10\ 2*10\ 5xl0k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle design and with the same material with which, the approved model have been manufactured

IF. No. WM-21(27)/2O01J P A. KRJSHNAMOORTHY. Director, Legal Metrology MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Ddhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2098.—In puisuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore as ^hown in the Annexuie in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. and their workman, which was received bv the Central Government on 2O-07-2O07.

[No. L-430J2/25/95-IR(M)1 B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CFNTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE Dated : 3rd July, 2001

PRESENT •

Hon'ble V. N Ki-Il'arni, Presiding Officer

CR. No, 125/97

I Party

The Senior Vice President, BGML Labour Association (INTUO, NT Block. Oorgaum, KGF-563120.

IJ Parti

Fhe Managing Director. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd., Suvarnn Bhavan, Oorgaum, KGF-563120.

APPEARANCfcS :

I Party : B. D. Kutlappa, Advocate

II Party : A S. Bopanna, Advocate

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide Order No. L-43012/25/<>5-IR(Mi>>c.) dated 11- 03-1996 foi adjudication on the following schedule.

SCHEDULE

" Whether the management of Bharat Gold Mines Limited is justified in inflicting two punishments on the workman, Shri 11. M. Venkatcsha vide standing Order No. 20(a) 1 and 20(a) 4 for one alleged mis- conduct committed by him ? Tf not, what benefit he is entitled to and from which date T

2. I party is working with the II party. The management for the elleced misconduct imposed punishment of stopping of increments and theiefore dispute is raised.

2435 GI/20O1—32

43S5 1 The case of the I party is that on 19-03-1990 he was transferred from KGF to Ramgiri Gold Mines Project at Andhra Pradesh He should have reported immediately for duty, but on 19-3-1990 he went to hospital at Bangarpet as he was suffering from Back Pain and he was discharged by " (lio Doctor on 31-05-1990 with the Medical Certificates. On 31-05-1990 he reported to duty with Medical Certificate. It is the further case of the I Party that his leave was not '^nctionrd and his increments was stopped. Details of salary is given in para 4 of the Claim. The management without any rcascn withheld the increment and the action is not justified. The I party has prayed to pass award in his favour.

'I. The care of the II party is in brief as under, ^. The I party was workman in Foreman 'B' Grade draw- ir.p a basic of Rs, 1833.00 plus DA. He is not a workman. It is not con ect thnt the I party has rendered excellent service. It is the farther case of the management that the T party remained absent unauthorisedly from 1-3-1990 to 31-5-1990 nnrl he remained absent for 81 dnys during the year 1990. T!iv fact that hi¹ fell nick is not correct. The II party Is having a well-equipped 240 bed hospital, but the I party had not imported to the company hospital. The medical certificate produced bv the I party was not accepted. The attendance of the I partv is riven in para 4 of the Counter. As per the ri'l"s of tip comp&nv, if any employee remain absent for mnic thnn 40 days, he will not earn Annual Increment and as such. 1 party remained absent for more than 40 days and incroment was not earned by him and therefore Annual Increment was not given and the dispute is raised is not correct. The Management has prayed to reject the Claim.

6. It is also stated that the workmen has not worked for 240 day;, in the year.

'. On behalf of the Management one witness is examined. He h a Personal Manager and his evidence is that the work- man was transferred to Rnmgiri, but he reported to duty only on 1-6-1990 and he remained unauthorisedly absent. His further evidence is that the T party did not produce Medical Certificate from a Doctor of Bant?arpet. He is absent for 81 days during the year 1990 and he was not entitled for Fanvd Leavr because hf did not work for 240 days in the year. This witness is cross-examined by the workmen hut nothing ii elicited from his cross-examination to damage the Fvidcnc* of MW1. From the evidence of the Management w'fncss it is clear that the I party remained absent un- nn'hr.riscdly for 81 days and as per the rules he was not entitled for any increment. We have the evidence of I party v nrfcman nnd accordinc to his evidence, he was not well •ind he joined hospital of the Company and he was discharged but there after he could not join duty and he went to Gov- ernment Hospital, His further evidence is that his leave was not sanctioned and he has worked for more than 240 days and documents Ex. W-l to W-10 are marked in his evidence. The worl n^an has not stated that on account of his illness hr wn<- unr.hle to nonly leive. He has not even stated as to what s'rfncss h" had. tnfact, in the Claim Statement it is stated t'ia< he had Back Pain. The I party workman has not •iteited this in his evidence. The evidence of I partv workman is noL believcable at all It is the case of the Manncement that in lh> year 1990, I party has not worked for 240 days ccntimiou'ly nnd as per the lules he could not earn increment and for Mnt purpose the increment was not granted. Docu- ment filed by the I party workman are pot helnfnl to say thn< the I nartv w.is continuously sick and Bed Ridden and v/is iiii.iH^ to annjy leave. There is no explanation from fhe I nartv RS to why he did n"t report at the Company Hosnital •iibseqiienlly. In vw of this, the Medical Certificates filed f"V him or" not helpful to the I party workman, There is no merit m this reference and accordingly I proceed to pass tl'e following order.

ORDER

Reference is rejected.

(nictated to the I.DC. transcribed by him, corrected and Mjicd by me on 3rd July 2001)

V N. KULKARNI, PresidinR Officer4386 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SE^. 3(ii)] Tribunal to appear and file--thdr respective statements and document-*. Rut inspitc of receipt of notice both the parties have not taken any step. The indifference and silence of the parties in my opinion suggests that, no dispute exists between the parties.

3. Hence, no dispute award is passed.

4, Reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated and Corrected by me.

S. K. DHAL, Presiding Offlcei New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2099.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes, the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar (Orissa) as shown in the Annexure. in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the M/s. Utkal Electro Casting Pvt. Ltd, and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 20-7-2001.

[No. L-29012/82/97-IR(M)l

B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001 CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRTBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT : BHUBANESWAR

PRESENT:

Shri S. K. Dlial. OSJS (Sr. Branch). Presiding Officer,

C G,I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

S.O, 2100.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (14 uf 1947), the Central Governmeo* hereby publishes the Award of the Central Oovt. Ind. Tri- bunal-cum-Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annex- ure, m the industrial dispute between the employers in i ela- tion to the M|s. BURN Standard Co. Ltd. and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 20-7-2001 Tr. Industrial Dispute Case No. 156/2001

[No. L-29O12/96/97-IR(M)l Dated: Bhubaneswar. the 11th JuJv. 2001

B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

BETWEEN

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT FNDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI Tht: Manasement of MA. Utkal Electro Castinjt Pvt. Ltd., Friendt Colony, Cuttuck,

Friday, the 29th June, 2001

. . .. 1st Party- ManaRement

PRESENT :

AND

K. Karthikcy.'n, Picsiding Officei

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. 49112001

(Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal I.D. No. 60|98) Their workman, beinjt represented through the Secretary, United Mines Mazdoon; Union. Anil Amruti Sadan, At/P.O. Barsuan. Dist. Sundarcarh. 2nd Party- Workmen

APPEARANCES:

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2fA) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, between the Workman Shri Kullan Raja Gounder and the Management M|s. Burn Standard Co. Ltd, Salem.)

BETWEEN

None. . . For the 1st Party-Manajtement. Nnnj. . For the 2nd Party-Workmen.

Shri Kullan Raja Gounder : T Party|Workman.

AWARD

AND

The General Manager, Mis. Bum Standard Co. Ltd . Salem.

: u PartylManagement.

APPEARANCE :

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour in exercir-c of Powers Conferred bv Clause (d) of sub-soction (1) and ;i'b seel''on 2fA) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for pdjudi'cntion vide their Order No. L-29012/82/97-IR(Misc), dated 29-1-1998:—

For the Workman : Sri G. Ramachandran, Advocate. For the Manauement : M|s, M,R, Ra^havan and K.

Vasn Venkar, Advocates.

AWARD

'"Whether the action of the Management of M/s. Utkal Electro Castinc Pvt. Ltd. in stopping work of their establishment from 1-12-1995 to 9-12-1995 and not paying the lay-off compensation to the workmen for the said period is justified 7 If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to ?"

Tlie Govt. of India. Ministry -of Labour in exercise of ⁷ The nnrties were intimated by the Government of India while sending the reference to this Tribunal. On receipt of the reference notice were also i&RuefJ to the parties by the

powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and mub- section 2CA) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act 1947 04 of 1947), have referred rhe following dispute! for adiudi-4387 Utwn vide Order No. L-29012|96|97-lR(Misc.) dated 9-3-1998 :—

"Whether the action of M|s. Burn Standard Co. Ltd., Salem, in giving premature retirement to Shri Kullan Raja Gounder with effect from 31-8-15)94 is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

2, The reference has been made earlier to the Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal, where it was taken on file as I.D. No. 60|98. On receipt of notice fi^m that Tribunal, both the parties entered appearance through their counsel and filed their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement. When the matter was pending enquiry, before the Tamil Nadu Slate Industrial Tribunal, as per the orders of transfer by the Central Govt., this case has been transferred from the file of Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal to the file of this Tribunal for adjudication. On receipt of records of this case from the Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal, this case has been taktn on file here as I.D. No. 491/2001 and notices were sent to the counsel on record on either side in- forming them about the transfer of this case from the file of Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal to the file of this Tri- bunal, with a direction to appear before this Court with their respective parties to prosecute this case further on 5-3-2001. 3, When the matter was taken up for enquiry on 5-3-2001, the- counsel on either side and both the parties were not i>rcsen.t and there was no representation on either side. So the case was adjourned from 5-3-2001 to various six sub- sequent hearing dates as 20-3-2001, 10-4r2001, 2-5-2001. ll-5:20OJ, 12-6-2001, 21-6-2001 on all these hearing dates, neither of the parties nor their respective counsel appeared before this Tribunal and there was no representation on cither aide. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 29-6-2001 for enquiry as last chance.

4, When the matter is taken up for enquiry today i.e. 29-6-2001, as usual, both the parties and the counsel on either side remained absent. There is no representation on cither side. This case has been referred to as an industrial dispute for adjudication by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour as early as 9-3-1998, The inaction of the I Partyl Workman by his non-appearance and non-representation enables this Tribunal to conclude that there is no industrial dispute as such n ow existing between the parties concerned, Hence, this industrial dispute i3 dismised for default and for non-representation.

.*>. In the result, an award is passed holding that no relief can be granted to the concerned workman Shri Kullan Raja Gounder. No Cost.

(Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed and typed by him, coirected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 29th June, 2001.)

K. KARTHIXEYAN, Presiding Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.,0. 2101.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government In- dustrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar f'Oriasa) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Nuasahi Chromite Mines and their workmen which was received by the Central Gov- ernment on the 20-7-2001.

[No. L-29012/lll/98-IR(M)] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR PRESENT :

Shri S. IC Dhal, OSJS (Sr. Branch), Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

Tr. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 208|2001 Dated, Bhubancswar, the 4th luly, 2001

BETWEEN

The Management of M[s. Nuasahi Chroniite Mines of IMFA Ltd. Rasulgarh, Bomikhal, BBSR .. First Party-Manage-

ment

AND

Their Workman Smt. Dura Naik,

At. Baniapanka, Keonjhar. , . Second party-workman.

APPEARANCES :

Shri M. K. Mahapatm and .. For the First Shri M.R. Kar. Party-Management. None. . . For the Second Party^Managemtnt.

AWARD

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No, L-29012|lll| 98flR(M), dated 13-1-1999 :—

"Whether the action of the Management of Nausahi Chromite Mines of IMFA Ltd. terminating the ser- vices of Smt. Dura Naik, Mazdoov, without any charges and in violation of the principle of natural justice and provision of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is justified and legal? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled"?

"Whether the demand of the workman Smt, Dura Naik, Mazdoor, on Nausahi Chromite Mines of IMFA Ltd., for reinstatement with full back wages is legal and justified? If so, to what idief the workman is entitled"?

2. While making reference intimation was sent to the work- man (hereinafter called as the 2nd Party) and to the Mana- gement (hereinafter called as- the 1st Party) directing them to file their claim statement, written statement and relevant documents before the Tribunal. On receipt of the reference the Tribunal also issued notices to both the parties. Inspite of such notice the 2nd Party-workman did not take any step. No claim statement was filed bv the workman inspite of opportunity given to him. Tho 1st Party-Management has made their appearance.

3. It is submitted on beiialf of the Management that the 2nd party-workman had no dispute at all and the action taken by the Management was in accordance with the rules and provisions of Industrial Dispute Act and no illegality was committed by the Management.

4. The 2nd Party workman has not jesponded to the notice issued from the Ministry and from the Tribunal. She has aslo4388 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2G01/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART n—SBC;3(u)]^ no filed any claim statement inspitc of notice issued to her. In absence of claim statement and other materials it enn nut be said that there exists an Industrial Dispute between the parties. The absence of 2nd Party-workman suggests that she has got no cause of action.

5. From the above facts it can be inferred that at present the 2nd Party-workman has (jat no dispute with the 1st Party-Management.

6. Hence, no dispute award is passed.

J. The reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated and cot rested by me.

S. K. DHAL, Presiding Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001 S.O 2102.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government In- dustrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bhubanciwar (Orissa) as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Nuasahi Chromitc Mines and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on the 20-7-2001.

[No. L-29012/il2/98JR(M>] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, Bl-TLBANESWAR PRESENT :

Shri S. K. Dhal, OSJS (Sr. Branch), Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

Tr. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 20912001 Dated, Bhubaneswar, the 6th July 2001

BETWEEN

The Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of M|s. IMFA Ltd., Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar. .. First Party- Management.

AND

Their workman Smt, Rebati Patra, At. Todabahali, P.O. Boroni, Via Hadagarh, Kt-onjhar. . . Second Party-Workman APPEARANCES :

Shri M.K. Mahapatra and Shri M.R, Kar. .. For the First P"rty-Manaflement. None. . . For the Second Party-workman.

AWARD

The Government of India hj the Ministry of Labour in exorcist) of power* conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), have referred the follow- ing dispute for adjudication vide their Order No L-29012| 112[98|1R(M), dated 13-1-1999 :—

"Whether the action of the Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of IMFA Ltd. in terminating the services of Smt. Rebati Patra, Mazdoor without any charge and violating the principles of natural justice and provision of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is justified and legal? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled"?

"Whether the demand of Smt. Rebati Patra on Nuasahi Chronute Mines of IMFA Ltd. for reinstatement with full back wages is justified? If so, to what relief the workman is entitled"?

2. While making reference intimation was sent to the wcikman (hercinaUer called as the 2nd Party) and to the Management (hereinafter called as the 1st Party) directing them to file their claim statement written statement and rele- vant documents before the Tribunal. On receipt of the refe- rence the Tribunal also issued notice to both the parties. Inspite of such notice the 2nd Party-workman did not take any itep. No claim statement was filed by the workman inspite of opportunity given to her. Tho 1st Party-Manage- ment has made etheir appearance.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the Management that the 2nd Party-woikman hud no dispute at all and the action taken by the Management was in accordance with the rubs and pto.Lsions of Industrial Dispute Act and rio illegality wa>; committed by the Management.

4. The 2nd Party-workman has not responded to the notice issued from the Ministry and from the Tribunal. She has also not filed any claim statement Inspite of notice issued to her. In absence of claim statement and other mate- rials it can not be said that there exists an Industrial Dis- pute between (he parties. The absence of 2nd Party-work- man suggests that she has got no cause of action.

5. From the above facts it can be Inferred that at present the 2nd Party-workman has got no dispute with the 1st Pnrty-Mnn;igeinent.

6. Hence, no dispute award is passed.

7. The reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated and corrected by me.

S. K. DHAL, Presiding Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2103.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government In dustrinl Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar (Orissa as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute betwecr the employers in relation to the Nuosahi Chromite Minis anc their workmen which was received by the Central Govern ni'jnt on the 20-7-2001.

I No. L-29012/113/y8-IR(M) 0. M. DAVID, Under Secy4389 7, The reference is answered accordingly.

ANNEXURE

Dictated and corrected by me.

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

S. K. DHAL, Presiding Officer 10-3-2001 PRESENT:

Sliri S K Dhal. OSJS, (Sr. Branch), Presiding Officer,

C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

Tr INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 210|2001 Dtd. Bhubancswar the 10th July 2001

BETWEEN

The Management of Nussahi Chromite Mines of M|s. IMFA Ltd. Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar.

. . First Party-Management.

AND

Their workman, Shri Jjyceram HO At. Gabaldihi, P.O. Dhanurjaypur. Keonjhar. Second Party-workman.

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001 APPEARANCES :

Shri M.K. Mahapatra and

Shrl M.R. Kar. . . For the First Paity-Managemem. None. . . For the Second Party-Workman.

AWARD

SO. 2104.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government nereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar (Oriesa), as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in, relation to the Nuaaahi Chromite Mines and their workmen which was ~ received by the Central Government on the 20-7-2001.

[No. L-29012/114/98-IR(Mjj

B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

Tht Government of India in the Ministry of Labour in exercise of Powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dis- putes Act, 1947 (14 of 947), have referred tho following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L-29012|l 13|98| IR(M), dated 13-1-1999 :

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

PRESENT :

Shri S. K. Dhal, OSJS (Sr. Branch), Presiding Officer,

CG.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

"Whether the action of the Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of IMFA Ltd. in terminating the services of Sliri Jayeeram HO, Mazdoor, with- out any charge and violating the principles cf natural justice and provisions of Industrial Dis- putes Act, 1947 is justified and legal? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

Industrial Dispute Case No. 211/2001

Bhubaneswar, the 10th July, 2001

BETWEEN

'"Whether the demand of the workman Shn layeoram HO, Nuasahi Chromite Mines of IMFA Ltd. for reinstatement with full back wageb is justified? If so, to what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

The Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of M/s. IMFA Ltd. Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar.

.. .First Party— Management

AND

Their workman, Shri Bfilaram Padhuna, At Nusrugudi, P.O. Padhuaripalli, Keonjhar.

2. While miking reference intimation was sent to the workman (hereinafter called as the 2nd Party) and to the Management (hereinnfrer called as the 1st Party) directing them to file their claim statement, written statement and re- levant documents before the Tribunal. On receipt of the reference the Tribunal also issued notice to both the parlies. Inspite ol such notice and 2nd Party-workman did not take any step. No claim statement was filed by the workman inspite of opportunity given to him. The 1st Party Manage- ment has made their appearance.

. .Second Party— Workman.

APPEARANCES:

Shri M. K. Mahapatra & Shri M. R. Kar—For the First 3, It is submitted on behnlf of the Management that the 2nd Party-workman had no dispute at nil and the action taken by the Management was in accordance with the rules and provisions of Industrial Dispute Act and no illeealiiy was committed by the Management.

party—Management.

None—For the Second Party—Workman.

AWARD

any charge antl violating the principles of natural justice and provision of Industrial Disputes Act, 1*47 is. justified and legal ? If not, to what lellef the workman is entitled" ?

"Whether the demand of the workman Shri Balaram Padhuria, on Nuasahi Chromite Mines of IMFA Ltd. for reinstatement with full back wages is justified 7 If so, to what iclief the workman is entitled 7"

2. While making reference intimation was sent to the workman (hereinafter called as the 2nd Party) and to the Managomint (hereinafter called as the 1st Party) directing them to He their claim statement, written statement and relevant documents before the Tribunal. On receipt of the reference the Tribunal also issued notice to both the parties, lnspite of such notice the 2nd Party—workman did not tak? any step. No claim statement wtw filed by the workman inspite of opportunity given to him. The 1st Party—Manage- ment has made their appearance.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the Management that the 2nd Party—workman had no dispute at all and the action taken by the Management wa* in accordance with the rules and provisions of Industrial Dispute Act and no illegality was committed by the Management

4. The 2nd Party—workman has not responded to Ihe notice issued from the Ministry and from the Tribunal. He has also not filed any claim statement inspite of notice issued to him. In absence of cla4m statement and other materials it can not be said that there exists an Industrial Dispute between the parties, The absence of 2nd Party workman suggests that he has got no cause of action 5. From the above facts it can be inferred that at present the 2nd Party—workman has got no dispute with the 1st Party—Management.

6. Hertce, no dispute nward is passed.

7. The reference is answered accordingly.

Dlctat"J & corrected by me.

S. K. DHAL, Presiding Officer New Delhu the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2105—In pursuance of Section 17 ot the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar (Orissa), as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Nuasahi Chromite Mines and their workmen which was received by the Central Centra] Government on 20-7-2001.

(No. L-29012/118/98-IR(M1)J B. M, .DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR PREShNT:

Shri S, K. Dhal, OSJS (Sr. Branch) Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Cburt, Bhubarieswar. Tr. Industrial Dispute Case No. 215/2001 .Bhubaneswar, the 5th July, 200T

BETWEEN

The Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of MA. IMFA Ltd. Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar.

.. .First P a r t y- Management.

AND

Their workman Shri Jagannath Tanty, At Uahaldihi, P.O. DhanurjAypur, KednjFiar.

. .. Second Party— Workman.

APPEARANCES :

Shri M. K. Mahapatra & Shri M R. Kar—Foi the First Party—Management.

None—For the Second Party—Workman

AWARD

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour in i-Aercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) have refen-cd the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L-29O12/118/98- 1R(M), dated 13-1-199?:—

"Whether the action of the management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines" of IMFA Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Jagannath Tanty, Mazdoor, with- out liny charges and in violation of the principles of uatUral justice and provisions of Industrial Dis- putes Act, 1947 is justified 7 If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to'?"

'Whether the demand of the workman Shri Jagannath Tanty, on Nuasahi Chromite Mines of IMFA Ltd. f6r liinstatem'ent with full back wages is justified? If so, to what relief the workman is entitled ?" 1, While making reference intimation was sent to the workman (hereinafter called as the 2nd Party) and to the Management (hereinafter called as the 1st Party) directing them td file their claim statement, written statement and relevant documents before the Tribunal. On receipt of the reference the Tribunal also issued notice to both the parties, inspite of such notice the 2nd Party—workman did not take any step. No tjaim statement was filed by the workman inspire of opportunity given to him. The 1st Party—Manage- ment haj made their appearance,

3. It is submitted on behalf of the Management that the ind Party—workman had no dispute at all and the action taken by the Management was in accordance with the rules and provisions" of Industrial Dispute Act and no illegality was committed by the Management.

4. The 2nd Party—workman has not responded to the notice issued from the Ministry and fiorn the Tribunal. He has also not filed any" claim statement inspite of notice issued to him. In absence of claim statement and Other mrittrials it c.ui not be said that there exists an Industrial Dispute between the parties. The absence of 2nd Party— workman suggests that he has got no cause of action.

5. From the above facts it can be inferred that at present the 2nd Pnrty—workman has got no dispute with the 1st Party- - Management.

6 Hence, no dispme award is passed

7 The reference is answered accordingly.

U/ctated & corrected by me.

S. K. DHAL, Presiding Oftcer4391 New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2106.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labcur Court, Bhubaneswar (Orissa), as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Nuasahi Chromite Mines and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on the 20-7-20O1

[No. L-290l2/182/98-IR(MM

B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TR1BUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR PRESENT:

'Shri S. K, Dhal, OSJS (Sr. Branch), Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar. TR. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 244/2001 Dated. Blnibaneswar, the 5th July, 2001 BETWEEN

The Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of M/s. IMFA Ltd. Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar,

.. . First Party— Management.

AND

Then Workman Sbri Kuni Naik, At, Nuorugudi, P.O. Padhiaripally, KeonjTiar.

.. Second P a r t y- Workman.

APPEARANCES :

Shri M. K, Mahapatra & Shri M. R. Knr~For the First Party—Management.

None—For (he Second Party—Workman.

AWARD

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour in '-•xercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and wb-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 19471 hnve referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L-29012/182/98/ IR(M), dated 20-4-1999:—

"Whether the action of the Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of M/s. IMFA Ltd., in refuMnq* employment to Shri Kuni Naik, is legal and justi- fied "" Tf not, to what relief the workman is entitleJ t o ?"

2, While making reference intimation was sent to the uorkronn. (Hereinafter called as the 2nd Party) and to the Management (hereinafter called, as the 1st Party) directing them to file their claim statement, written statement and relevant documents before the Tribunal. On receipt of the i efcrence the Tribunal also issued notice' to both' the parties. Inspite of such notice the 2nd Party—workman did not take any step. No claim-'statement wa"" filed by the workman inspite of opportunity given to him. The 1st Party—Manajte- ment has made their appearance.

1. It is submitted on behalf of the Management that the 2nd Party—woikman had no dispute at all arid thp action taken by the Management was in accordance witty the rules and provisions of Industrial Dispute Act nnd no illegality vi as committed by the Management.

4. The 2nd Party—workman has not responded to the notice issued from the Ministry and from the Tribunal. He has a lo not filed any claim statement inspite of nptice irsued to him. In' absence of claim statement and other materials it can not be said that there exist* an Industrial Dispute between the parties. The absence of 2nd Party— woikman sugcestt, (hat he has got no cause of action.

5. From the above facts it can be inferred that at present the 2nd Paity—workman has pot no dispute with the 1st Party—Management.

6 Hence, no dispute award is passed.

7. The reference i_s answered accoidinftly.

Dictated & corrected hy me.

S. K, DHAL, Presidinfi Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

SO, 2107.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 19*17 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government In- dustrial TribunaUcum-Lab-our Court, Bhubaneswar (Ori'-sa) as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Nuasahi Chromite Mines and Iheir workmen which was received by the Central Gov- ernment on the 20-7-2001.

[No. L-29O12a83/98-IR(M")|

B. M. DAVTD, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRTBUNAL- CUM LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR PRESENT :

Shri S.K Dhal, OSJS. (Sr. Branch) Presiding Officer, CG.I.T.-cum-Labour Couit, Bhubaneswar.

Tr. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 245|2OQ1 Dated, Bhubaneswar, the 5th July, 20Q{4392 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] BETWEEN

The Management of Nutwahi Chromite Mines of M|" tMFA Ltd , Rasulgarh, Bhubane*war,

.. First Party-Management.

AND

Their workman Shn Kailash Bentakar, At. Nuarugudi, P.O. Padhiaripaily, Keonjhar.

. . Second Party-workman APPEARANCES :

Shri M.K. Mahapatra and Shri M.R. Kar, .. For the First Party-Management.

None . . For the Second party-Workman.

AWARD

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour iu exercise of Powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) have referred the follow- ing dispute for adjudication vide tliclr Order No. L-290121 1S3|98|IR(M), dated 20-4-1999 :—

"Whether the action of the management of Nuastthi Chromite Mines of M|s. IMFA in refuting employ- ment to Shri Kailash Bentakar is legal and justi- fied? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled"?

2. While making reference intimation was writ (o the workman (herein-after called as the 2nd Paify) and to the Management (herein-after called as the 1st Party) directing (hem to file their claim statement, written statement and relevant documents beforo the Tribunal. On receipt of the reference the Tribunal also issued notice to both the par- ties. Inspile of such notice the 2nd Party-workman did not take any ^tcp. No claim statement was filed by the work- man in"pite of opportunity given to him. The 1st Parly- Manftficment has made their appeurance.

3 It is submitted on behalf ot the Management That the 2nd Party-workman had no dispute at all and [he action taken bv the Management was in accordance with the rules and provisions of Industrial Dispute Act and no illegality u ti" committed by the Management.

4 The 2nd Pnrrv-worknyin has not responded to the notice issued from the Ministry and from the Tribunal. He h s also not filed any claim statement inspite of notice i"t"'cd ro him. In absence of claim statement and other m 'torinJs if can not be said tbtu there exists an Industrial Di>rnte between trie parties. The absence of 2nd Party - workmjn suggests (hnt he has got no cause of action.

1 Frair the above facts it enri be infeired that at present ?nrl Partv-workman has got no dispute with the 1st I'ulv-Mfinngement

fi Hence, no dispute award is passed.

7 The reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated * Corrected by me.

S. K. DHAL, Presiding Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

SO 2108—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Govorrmrnt hcieby publishes the Award of the Central Government In- dustrial Tribunal-ciim-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar (Orissa) as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Nuasahi Chromite Mines and their workmen which was received by the Central Gov- ernment on the 20-7-2001

[No, L-29012|186|98-]R(M)]

B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR PRESENT :

Shri S. K. Dhal, OSJS (Sr Branch) Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

Tr. Industrial Dispute Case No 246(2001 Dated, Bhubaneswar,the 4th July, 2001

BETWEEN

The Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of M|s. IMFA ltd., Rnsulgarh, Bhubaneswar.

.. First Party-Management.

AND

Their workman, Shri Tarft Patra, At. Aturikona, P.O. Padhinripally, Keonjhar

. Second Party-Workman.

APPEARANCES :

Shri M,K. Mahapatra and Shri M.R. Kar. : . For the First Party-Management. None. For the Second Party-Workman,

AWARD

Tho Govement of India in the Ministry of labour in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) Of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), have referred the following; dispute for adjudication vide their Order No L-29012|18fi( 98-lR(M), dated 20-4-1999:—

"Whether the action of the Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of M/s. IMFA in refusing employ- ment to Shri Tara Patra, is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled"' 2. While making reference intimation was sent to the workman (herein-after called a.s the 2nd Party) and to the Management (herein-after called as the let Party) directing them to file their claim statement, written statement and relevant documents before the Tribunal. On receipt of the refrerence the Tribunal also issued notice to both the parties. Inspite of such notice the 2nd Party-workman did not lake anv step. No calim statement was filed by the workman inspitc of opportunity tjiven to him. The 1st Party-Manage- ment has made their appearance.

3, It is submitted on behalf of the Management that tho 2nd Partv-workman had no dispute at all and the action taken by the Management was in accordance with the rules and provisions of Industrial Dispute Act and no illegality war committed by the Management.

4. The 2nd Party-workman has not responded to the notice issued from the Ministry and from the Tribunal, He has also not riled any claim statement inspite of notice issued to her. Tn absence of claim statement and other materials it enn not be said that there exists an Industrial Dispute between ibe parties. The absence of 2nd Party-workman suggests thai he has not no cause of action.

5. From the above facts it can be inferred that at present the 2nd Party-workman has got no dispute with the 1st Pai ty-Manngemont.

(\ Hence, no dispute award is passed.

7. The reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated and corrected by me.

S. K. DHAL, Presiding Officer.

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S O. 2109.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government In- dustrial Tribunal-ciim-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar (Orissa) as shown in the Annexuie, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Ntiasahi Chromite Mines and their workmen which was received by the Central G-overnment on 20-7-2001.

INo. L-29012|187|98-IR(M)]

B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR PRESENT :

Shri S. K. Dhal, OSJS (Sr. Branch) Presiding Officer.

C.G.f.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

Tr, TNDUSTRrAT DTSPUTF, CASE NO. 24712001 Dated, Bhubaneswar, the 4th July, 2001

BETWEEN

The Management of M|s, Nuasahi Chromite Mines of IMFA Ltd., Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar. . . First Party-Management,

AND

Their workman Shri Sanatan Biswal, At. Nuarugudi, P.O. Padhiaripally, Kconjhar.

, , Second Party-workman.

APPEARANCES :

Shri M.K. Mahapatra and Shri M.R. Kar. . . For (he First Party-Management. None. . . For the Second Party-workman, 2-nj G v n oi -.3

AWARD

The Government of Tndia in the Ministry of Labour in exeicise of Powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section fl) nnd Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L-29O12|1S7| 9K-IR(M), dated 20-4-1999:—

"Whether the aclron of the Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of M]s. IMFA Ltd., bv refusing employment to Shri Sanatan Biswal is legal anil justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to" ?

2. While making reference intimation was sent to the workman (herein-after called as the 2nd Parly and to the Management ("hereinafter called as the 1st Party) directing them to file their claim statement, written statement and relevant documents before the Tribunal. On receipt ot the reference the Tribunal also issued notice to both the parties. Inspite of such notice the 2nd Party-workman did not take any step. No claim statement was filed by the work- man inspite of opportunity given to him. The 1st Parly-Mana- gement has made their appearance.

3. Tt is submitted on behalf of the Management that the 2nd Party-workman had no dispute at all and the action taken by the Management was in accordance with the rules and provisions of Industrial Dispute Act and no illegality was committed by the Management.

4. The 2nd Party-workman has not responded to the notice issued from the Ministry and from the Tribunal, He has also not filed any claim statement inspite of notice issued to him. Tn absence of claim statement and other materials it can not be said that there exists an Industrial Dispute between the parties, The absence of 2u, Party-workman suggests that he has got no cause of action,

5. From the above facts it can be inferred that at present the 2nd Party-workman has qot no dispute with the 1st Party-Management.

6. Hence, no dispute award is passed.

7. The reference is answered accordingly.

Dicatted and Corrected by me.

S. K. DUAL, Presiding Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2110.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha (Kerala) as shown in the Annexure in the Indust- rial dispute between the employers in relation to the mana- gement of The Dy, General Manager, Balmer Lawrie and Co. Ltd, and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 20-7-2001.

[No. L-3OO1I|65|2OOO-1R(M)1

B, M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT Oh THE INDUS 1 RIAL TRIBUNAL. ALAPPUZHA

(Dated [his the: 22ml day of June 2001) PRESENT :

Shi i M. N. Ri.dliaki ishna Mienon Industrial Tribunal I.D. No. 9I200KC)

BETWEEN

The Dy. General Manager, Balmei Lawrie and Co. Ltd., Aroor,

AND

Their workmen of the above concern represented by the (1) Vice President, Balmcr Lawrie Employees Orga- nisation, Aroor-688534, Kerala.

2. The Secretary, Balmer Lawiic Thozhilali Union, Aroor-688534, Kerala.

AWARD

The Oovernment of India has as per their order No. L- 30011|6512000|IR(M) dated 24-1-2001 icferred this indust- rial' dispute between the above paities in respect of the fol- KDwing issues for adjudication to this Tiibunal:

"Whether the action of the management of M[s. Balmcr Lawrie and Co., Aroor in tcrminatinfl the services of S|Sri, Jayakumar (Token No. 1348), Vishnu- -kumari K.S. (T. No. 1349), Shaji, C M. ((\ No. 1350), Sussant, C.K. (T.No. 1351), Biiu, T.B. (T. No. 1352) and Venugopal, B S. (T. No. 1353) operative (Welder, Fitters) in labour Gr, II, with effect from 12-4-2000 is justified? Tf not. to what relief these workers are entitled to?"

2, Above reference was accepted to file nnd issued notice to the parties to appear on 9-3-2001, puisuanl to which, the mnrwfiemcnt ffppeored but the union did not appear. Hence registered notice was issued to the union (o appear on 6-4-2001. Fventhough the union has accepted the notuc, they did not appear and present iheir claim. Theiefoie (hey were declared-ex-pnrte and the- matter was posted for mana- gement's version On 22-6-2001, the counsel for the m.inn- pentanr submitted thai the factoty has been closrd long back and the entire workers have left after accenting (heir cornnen- sotion and nil other benefits. His submission is rccoided.

3. In view of the above, I hereby pass an award holding that there does not suhiist nnv< industrial depute between the. parties warrantipg fm adjudication by this Tribunal nt present.

(Dated this the 22nd dnv of Tune 2001) M, N. RADHAKR1SHNA MENON, Industrial Tnhimal ISVw Delhi the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2111.—In puihuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 19-17 (14 of 1947). the Cential Government heieby pnbl --lies the Award of the Central Government Iruhi.trijl TJ bun.il-cum-Labour Court, MUMBAI us shown in the Auncxuie, m Hit- industrial dispute between the cm- plovers in iclniion to the BOMBAY PORT TRUST and their workmen which v.as received by the Central Government on 20-7-2001.

[No. L-31O12|5|97-IR(M)| B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BFFORF T1TH ChNTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, MUMBAI

PRESENT :

S. N. Saundankar,

(In-ChaiKe Piepidine Officer)

Reference No. CG1T-1I54 of 1997

MV1P1 OYFRS IN RFLAT1ON TO THE MANAGFMFNT OF BOMBAY PORT TRUST

The Chairman, Bombay Port Trust, Ballaul Istate, Mumbai.

AND

Thcii Workmen.

Shn Gunaji Khikaji Mas-avknr, Srnaji Nagar, Chawl No 2, Room No 2, Miimbra, Distt. Thane.

AI'PEARANCI S ;

For the Jimployei : 'Mr, M. B- Anchan, Advocate. For the Woikmen : Mr, Jaiprakash Sawant, Advocate. Mumbii, dated 25th June, 2001

AWARD-PART-1I

Bv the interim A waul dated 29th April, 1999. my Learned Piedecetsor held th.it the domestic inquiry held against the woilm.in Shri Gnnaji Bhikaji Mnsavkar vitiates as it was violating the Puncjples of Natural Justice and that findings ivroriiod bv llu- inquiry officer were perverse, and consequen- tly direcf"d 'he management to lead evidnece to iustify the nation of dismissing the services of Shri Masavkar fiom Bombay Port Tiust

2 The facts of the case in short is as under :

Mr. Naik, Atstt. Shed Superintendent on 17-2-87 at about 11 00 A M. noticed at Shed No. 17 some empty cartons on the No'th side of 'F' Bny. Consequently, he informed the rame (o llnj pulico constable Shri Deshmukh, Buckle No. 9341 and rs'ccd him (o inform Yellow Gate Police Station. On checking it was found that the pallet containing the film rolls wa* -i part of the consignment of item 18 of the vessel '•BOIZI'NBURG" It was also found that 2011 rolN of film wciv missing Polir-^ consequently arrested the workman filort'iwith others- and that on 28-2-87 one of the accused Mi Raii^ir,! ccnifr=s"d that he alongwith workman MY. Mnsavkar, Ashok Chavan. Keshav Mhutre and Ramesh Jadhav had stolen film rolls on 15i2jK7 from Shed No 17 and volimtfcm,] to show tin¹ shot> and the person to whom Ashnk Chavnn ^c'd the same "He led the police partv and pointf\1 oni- Mr Ro"hanlnl lain ai Ruby Chambcj-s, Buiidina. Fjit Mnikcf S^'d lain nroduced one gunnv bag containing 7 bo\'js rnrh box contaimnir 100 film rolls and they have b en i'"C'vnrd "n 27-6-19R7 in panchannma. It is oonter- ij \1 woikms'n Mi. Masnvkar i" the prosprree of Pnnchas ' • a t t fd t h at he r i o n e w i th G h a p. C h a v an a nd o t h e rs h a ve s t o- loliee Mnd P-infhn'. *o Room No. 13. Bldg. No, 4|16. 1st Moor M K ^m;n Marf and nointed out a nerson n"m' il Gon-il ^ i p hi iyhn i'n tiirn tr'fidueed orw biif six curd boai'd box t-ont-inirnT (4 nTki'ts each containing 10 film lolN'and ^ TIT'-T'> of film r^Hs HT>d nlso p ^ ^ d n e *^ ^ve f*T^d boai'd boxes each containing 100 film rolls, make of Germany.

It is contended since the woikmnn Masavkar was involved in a tlieft case he was chargesheeted before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 6th Coun Ballard Pier, Bombay, bearing No. 397 JT* of 1987. The management, Bombay Porl TrLiit istucj a chargesheet and conducted inquiry and that the mquii y officer on examining the material witnessess con- cluded that cnaigc of theft against the workman has been proved and the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority endured the findings of the inquiry officer result- ing in dismissing him from the service, from 23-8-9J.

3. The workman Mr, Masavkar refuted the allegations made against lim. According to him he had been falsely implicated in the criminal case. Consequently he prayed for reinstatement in service with full back wages.

4. As stated above domestic inquiry conducted against the woikman Masavkai held to be vitiated and consequently management on giving opportunity to justify its action, led evidence of Mr. Shindc, Nasik, Deshmukh and Tawdc vide E\hibit-12 to 15 and in rebuttal workman Mi', Masavkar examined himsi-If at (Ex-16)

5. I have gone through the written submissions of the management M.B.P.T. (JixhibiM7) and the workman (Ex-18). On Perusing the record as a whole and the written sub- missions I recoid my findings on the issues framed by my Learned I'rcdeeessoi at Kxhibit-9 for the reasons as follows :—

Issues

Findings 3. Whether the action of the Not justified, management in dismissing the woikman is justified and legal ?

woikman is entitled ?

4. I[ not, to what relief the As per order below.

REASONS

6. At the outset it is to be noted that in view of ammend- ing Section 1]-A of the Industrial Disputes Act. since the domestic inquiiy held by the management against the work- man vitiates the validity of the action taken by it is to be scrutinised and adjudicated upon, on the basis of the fresh evidence. Inquiry proceedings on being found to be bad have to be ignored altogether, for which reliance can be had to Neeta Kaplish Vs, Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Anr. S.C. 1999 I CLR 219.

7. Mr. Naik deposed that when he was posted at Shed No 17, Indira Dock in the day shift on 17-2-87 at about 9,00 a.m. while taking round he saw empty cartons near the northern side, which he apprised to Assistant Manager and on his instruction contacted the Yellow Gate Police, and that cons- table Buckle No. 9341, was given the property, to be de- posited in lhe police station, and that on inquiry by the P.S.L Mi". Bhisi;, Panchanuma was prepared. Mr, Shinde, Laboui Supervisor deposed to the effect that in his presence Pancha- nama of the seizure of pallet was piepared by the police and that police constable Mr. Deshmukh said that he lodged a complaint on ccairance with the Yellow Gate Police Station, Mr Tawade who was then working as Assistant SlicJ Supeiin the management on that basis k totally not justified.

8. It is seen from the record workman Mr, Masavkar alongwith nine others were chargesheeted vide 397/P of 1987 under ^eclion 380 read with 114 of Indian Penal Code and were acquitted by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 38th Court, Ballard Pier, Bombay on 23rd October, 89. Theii Lordships of the Bombay High Court in Chandrakant Raoji Gaonkar Vs. Bombay Port Trust & Or^. 1995 I CLR 8fi0. mled that Hon'ble acquittal in the criminal case on merits, if charges in ciiminal case nnd disciplinary proceedings aie common, effeect of acquittal in criminal case warrants the dropping of disciplinary inquiry, In Abdul Hakim Ahmad V. District Superintendent of Police 1978 GLR, Their Loiciships ol the Gujarat High Court held that on the basis of the same material and on the'basis of re- appreciation of same evidenece which was thiTe before the criminal court, without anything more it is not open to the disciplinary authoiity to take contrary view and if thils is permitted then it would render the judicial system nugatory.

9. In view of the rulings and the discussion supra the action of tliL- manMiicnunt on the ground of misconduct as the woikman ulleaed to have committed theft is totally unjusti- fied, not proper and illegal. Consequently workman Mr. Masavkar is required to be reinstated in service and the management is liable to pay him full baok wages and otbei' consequential monetary benefits with continuity in service. Issues are theicfoie answered accordingly and hence thi order :—

ORDhK

The action of the management of Bombay Port Trust in dismissing the stivices of Shri Gunaji Bhitaji Masavkar w.e.f. 23-8-^1 is unjust, improper and illegal.

Management 1-j reinstate Mr, Masavkar in Service and him full back wages with continuity in service.

S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 20O1

S.O 2112.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Govt. Indus. Trl- bunal-cLim-Lahour Court, BHUBANKSWAR (OR1S6A) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employeis in nation to the NUASAHI CHROM1TK MINES and their workmen which was received by the Central Go- vernment on the 20-7-01.

I No. L-29012|5|99-IR(M)] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURH

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM IABOUR COURT: BHUBANESWAR PRESENT :

Shii S, K. Dhal. OSJS, (Si". BianchJ,

Piesiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-

Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

Tr. Industrial Dispute Case No, 26012001 Dated, Hhubaneswar, the 6th July 2001 BETWEEN :

The Management of Nuasalu Chromite Mines of M|s. 1MFA 'Ltd.,

Rasulgarh, Bhubancswar. . . First Party-Management.

(AND)

Their workman, Shri Bilas Paduria, Al, Nuakupudi, P O. Padhiaripalli. Kconjhar.

. . Second Party-workman4396 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PARr II—SEC. 3(ii)] APPEARANCES :

Shri M. K, M.ihupatra & Shri M, It. Kar. . . For the First Party-Management. .. For the Second Party-Workmau. None.

AWARD

as shown in the Anncxure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Maksud Ahmed Lukman Bhai (Lime Stone Mines Owner) and the workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20-07-2001.

l[No. L-29012l8|95-IR(M)] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

The Government of lnd;a in the Ministry of Labour in ejtercise of Powers conferred¹ by Clause (d) of suh-secli'Ti (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dis- putes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) have referred the following, dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L 29012151 99|IR(M), dated 7-6-1999 :—

"Whether the action of the Management of Nuasahi Chromite Mines of M/s, IMFA in refusing employ- ment to Shri Bilas Paduria is legal and justified 7 If not, to what relief the workman is entitled" ?

2. While making reference intimation was sent to the workman (hereinafter called as the 2nd Party) and to the Management (hereinafter called as the 1st Party) directing them to file their claim statement, written statement and relevant documents bciore the Tribunal. On receipt of the lefeience the Tribunal also issued notice to both the parties. Inspile of such notice the 2nd Party-workmun did not take any step. No claim statement was filed by the woikman inspite of opportunity given to him. The 1st Party-Manage- ment has made their appeaiance.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the Management that the 2nd Party-workman bad no dispute at all and the action taken by the Management was in accordance with the ruks and provisions of Industrial Dispute Act and no illegality was committed by the Management.

4. The 2nd Party-woi kman has not responded to the notice issued from the Ministry and from the Tribunal. He has also not filed any claim statement insnitc of notice issued to him. Tn absence of claim statement and other materials it can not be said that there exists an Industrial Dispute between the parties, The absence of 2nd Party- workan suggests that he has got no cause of action.

5. From the above facts it can be inferred that At present the 2nd Party-workman has got no dispute with the 1st Party Management.

6. Hence, no dispute award is passed,

7. The reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

S, K. DHAL, Presiding Officer.

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2113.—Tn pursuanc of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby pub- lishes the award of the Labour Court, Kota 4W

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2114.—In pursuance of Section 17 ol the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby pub- lishes the Award of the Industrial Tribunal, Kota as shown in the Anncxurc in the indus- trial dispute between the employers in rela- tion to the Associated Stone Industries and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 20-07-2001.

'[No. L-29012'58l99-TR(M)]

B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

New Delhi, the 24th July, 2001 '"Whether Shri Gnmhhir Singh who was working as Security Supervisor in the mines of M/s. Asso- ciated Stone Industries, Kota is a workman as de- Jinetl undei Section 2(S) of I.D. Act 7 If yes, whe- ther his itmoval from service by the management w c.f, 12-8 98 is justified 7 If not, to what relief the workman is entitled 7"

S.O. 2115.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of lc)47), the Central Government hereby pub- lishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal. Jodhpur as shown in the Annexurc in the In- dustrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Sonu Chuna Patthar (Jussehner) and their workman, which was received by the Central Govern- ment on 20-7-2001.

•[No. L-29012|47|93-TR(M)]

B. M. DAVID, Under Secy4399 4400 1HE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3iii)] New Delhi, the 24th July, 2001 S.O. 2116.—Tn pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby pub- lished the award of the Central Govt. Bhnba- neswar, as shown in the Annexure in the In- dustrial Dispute between the employers in re- lation to the management FACOR (BhadralO and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20-07-2001.

[No. L-29012l74l95-IR(M)l

B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRTBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESHWAR

PRESENT :

Sri S. K. Dhal, OSJS (Sr. Branch), Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum- Labour Court Bhubaneshwar.

Industrial Dispute case No. Tr. LD. 10712001 Dated, Bhubaneswar, the 28th June, 200!

BETWEEN :

The Management of Executive.

Mines. FACOR, Laxmi Bhawan, Kuans, Bhadrak. . . 1st Party- Mann gement.

AND

Their Workman Shri Sudarsan Roul Vill. Talagarh, PO. Nuagaon- Via, Jaipur Road, Dist. Jaipur. . . 2nd Party-Workman.

APPFARANCES :

Shri S. B. Nanda, Advocate.—For, the 1st Party Management.

Shri B. C. Bastia, Advocate.—For the 2nd Party Workman.

AWARD

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour, in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub sec- tion 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) have Re- ferred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L-29012I74195-IR (Misc.). dated 05-01-1996 :—

"Whether the action of the Management of FACOR in terminating the ser- vices of Shri Sudarsan Roul w.e.f. 6-9-94 is lawful and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to" ?

2. While making reference notice was sent to the Executive (Mines), FACOR (herein- after called as the 1st Party-Management) and Shri Sudarsan Roul, (herein-after called as the 2nd Party) directing them to file the statement of claims, relevant documents and litit of witnesses. Accordingly the 2nd Party filed his claim statement.

3. The case of the 2nd Party may be stated in brief :—

He was appointed by the 1st Party-Manage- ment as Blasting Foreman with effect from 21-4-1981 in a'consolidated pay of Rs. 800 per month. He was confirmed in his service as a Blasting Foreman in the scale of Rs. 680 with usual dearncss allowance under order dated 3-11-1982. Subsequently he was pro- moted as Sr, Foreman from 1-2-1987. He was discharging his duties most efficiently but suddenly the 1st Partv-Managemcnt ter- minated his services with effect from 6-9-1994 vide its order dated 5-9-1994 with- out assigning any reason. No notice or ' any compensation in lieu of notice was given to him before termination. It is further pleaded by the 2nd Partv that while he was working at Boula Chromitc Mines he was transferred and was relieved from Boula Chromite Mines on 14-7-94 (A.N.) and reached in his new place of posting on 15-7-1994 (Evcnina) nnd reported to the Mines Manager about his arrival. On the next date i.e. on 16-7-1994 he submitted his joining report but the Mines Manager did not allot him any duty cither in mines or in the Office, As the 2nd Party sat4401 idle he frequently approached the Mines Manager for allotment of work. But he was asked to quit the job. This is continued up(o 8-8-1994. He went on leave from 9-8-1994 due to sickness of his wife and subsequently he iell sick. After returning from leave when he reported for duty with medical certificate he was given termination order in which it was stated that his services were no longer required and his service has been terminated with effect from 6-9-1994. He was paid all his dues. He submitted a representation about his illegal termination but no reply was re- ceived by him. The further case of the 2r>d Party is that he being the workman as defined under section 2(s) of the Industrial Dispute Act his termination without any notice is illegal. So he raised a dispute before the Labour Commissioner (Central). As the re- conciliiation failed the matter was referred to the Government of India (Ministry of Labour) who subsequently made reference as stared above.

4. The 1st Party-Management in his written statement has taken the stand that, the 2nd Parlv was working in their organisation as a Sr. Foreman in the Management cadre per- forming his dutv in supervisory capacity having administrative power. He was drawing a sfiiirv of Rs. 4.673.22. So according to the 1st Party-Management, the 2nd Party was not a workman as per the defination u's. 2(s) of Industrial Dispute Act, The mnin stand of the 1st Partv-Management is th-.it the 2nd Partv not beine a workman this reference is no* maintainable.

5. On the above pieadines of thr parties the following issues have been settled :—

L Whether Shri S. Ronl is a workman within section 2(s) of the I.D. Act and on th?t counter whether the reference is maintainable ?

IT. Whether the nction of the M-nnaee- ment of FACOR in tcnrnnntinf* the services of Shri S. Ronl with effect from 6-9-1994 is lawful and justi- fied ?

III. To whnt relief, if any, the workman is entitled ?

6 On behalf of the 1st Partv-Mnnaqement D\. Manager (Mines¹! hns been exnmined as one of the witness whereas the 2nd Partv hns bf-n himqr-if examined in support of his 2435 GI/2001—34

pleadings. Both the parties have filed num- ber of documents which has been exhibited in this case.

FINDINGS

ISSUES NO. 1.

7. Mr. Nanda, learned Counsel appearing for the 1st Party-Management has farely conceded that the 1st Issue is the decisive one touching upon the maintainability of the reierence while the other two are conse- quential. According to him the 2nd Party vac not a workman as defined u|s. 2(s) of the Industrial Dispute Act so as to revoke the I.D. Act in respect of the present dispute. He has strongly canvassed that Shri Roul whe wa^ appointed as a Sr. Foreman does not come under the defination of workman as he was in the Management cadre performing the duties in supervisory capacity and also exer- cising administrative powers. According to Mr. Nanda the 2nd Part) was receiving a sum of Rs. 4,673.22 as wages and so he would not come under the definition of workman as per the LD. Act. Inviting the attention of this Tri- bunal Mr. Nanda has submitted both oral and documentary evidence if taken into considera- tion, the only conclusion that can be arrived that the 2nd Party was not a workman.

8. On the other hand Mr. Bastia, learned Advocate appearing for the 2nd Party refutt- ing all the contentions made on behalf of the 1st Party-Management has submitted that the 2nd Party is a workman as per the defina- tion under section 2(s) of thr ID Ac' Ac- cording to him in he reconciliation proceed- ing Hie reconciliation officer hold that the 2nd Party as a workman and tlv^re is existence of Industrial dispute between the parties and the Government of India (Ministrv of Labour has agreed to it and so has made the reference to this Tribunal and so nne can safely come to the conclusion that the 2nd Partv is a workman. He has further stated that the 2nd Party was discharging his duty ns a workman but not as a supervisory capacity. Placing reliance on the appoint- ment order (Ext.-1V Confirmation order VLxt.-2) Promotion Order (Ext.-3) and docu- ments produced bv the Management M # M1 it hns been submitted bv Mr. TCnstia that if those are taken into consideration no other coneiiKirm would be arrived except that the 2nd Pnrtv w"s a workman and he was not dis- Hinrinc the dutv in supervisory capaoitv, Mr. Bastia has also further submitted that the4402 THE GAZETTE OF TNDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART TT—SEC. J(ii)] salary is not a criteria to decide whether a person is a workman or not. The submissions made by both the parties require careiul consideration because this Issue will decide the fate of the 2nd Party.

9. Section 2 ( s) of I.D. Act defines the meaning of "workman",. It reads as follows :--

2 0) "Workman' means anv per on

brought out from the mouth of Management Witness No. 1 in his deposition that the 2nd Party is covered under the certified standing order of the company. The evidence of the workman is that he himself does the deep hole blasting in the mines. As he carries out the said work under Rule 160(2) of the Metaliierous Mines Regulation it can not be said that he was discharging as supervisory capacity. Reference has also been made to Rule 2 9 ( q) of the mines Rule to convince this Tribunal that the disputant was a workman.

(including an apprentice) employ- ed in any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, techni- cal, operational, clerical or super- visory work for hire or reward, whe- ther the terms of employment be expressed or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharg- ed or retrenched in connexion with, or as a consequence of, thtt dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to t Hi dispute, but does not include any such person :—

(\) Who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Armv Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy \ct 1957 (62 of 1957); or

(ii) Who is employed in the polic; service or as an of^o.-r or other employee or a person, or

(iii) who is employed mainly in a managerial or .Klunnistrativ" capacity; or

(iv) who, being employed in a super- visory caporty, d r v^ va *es exceeding one ihousji.d M* hun- dred rupees per mensem -n eter cises, either by Ih? nalmv of the duties attached to the oitiee or bv reason oC ihe powers v?sted in him, functions mainly of .1 mana- gerial nature.

10. Referring to appointment order (Ext.- 1), confirmation order (Rxt.-2) and Promo- tion Order (Ext.-3) it has been submii^jd on behalf of the 2nd Party tint the certified standing order is applicable only to the work- man under the provisions of certified stmd ing order Act and the defination of workman under the certified standing order Act is s-imc under section 2 ( s) of I.D, Act. It has been

11. On the other hand it has been conterd- ed on behalf of the Management that the evi- dence of the 2nd Party-workman and his remuneration would suggest that he was not a workman as per the provisions of I.D. Act. The 2nd Party, Shri Roul has himself examin- ed as workman witness No. 1. He has ad- milted that he was getting salary of Rs. 4,90) per month. He was reporting to the Mines Manager about the absence details of th.: workers attached to the blasting work g'v'mg comments as to whether such absence were un-authorisc. He also admitted that he was doing so after checking the attendance of the blasting personnels. He also further stat- ed that foreman, some blasters helpers and Mazdoors numbering about 15 to 20 were helping him in blasting work. Rel'ering to Ext.-C which is a report given by Shri Roul to the authorities complaining that without assistance of pump and drilling Deptt. and security Deptt. the blasting ODerations could not be carried out. It has been submitted th:it this work indicates that he was doing supervisory work. Reference has also made to Ext.-E & F in support of the pleadings of Hie 1st Party-Management. Ext.-E is a re- port of certain period indicating the time loss •"nd reasons for dclav in open cast blasting. Exf.-F is the letter of Mines Manager addrcss- ed to Shri Roul indicating his supervisory Jurisdiction. Shri Roul has also admitted that lv* wnS representing the Management before the Government as per assignment given to him. Reference can be made to Ext.-G. Shri Roul has also stated that he was recommend- ing about the safety measures to be tr>kcn in blasting (Ext.-H). Much emphasis was "iven to Ext. N whirh is a letter to the Mines M-,r>imT tnven by Shri Roul not to give him supervisory work for the undcr-grouund working since he rn1 oncn n st mines. Mr Roul has nlso admitt- ed tlrnt nil Icwe applications of pmniovecs of blasting section were being routed through4403 workman must be held to be employed to do that work which is the main work he is re- quired-to do, even though he may be inci- dentally doing other type of work. In that case the foreman, chemical was drawing a salary in excess of Rs. 500 per month and his duty are of supervisory nature and the manual work done by him personally is only incidental. In my opinion, the observations made in the cited case is applicable to the present case. The 2nd Party was drawing a salary in excess of Rs. 500 per month and he was doing more supervisory nature of work than the manual work done by him pre- sently which can be called as incidental. So as per the above discussions, I agree with Mr. Nanda, learned counsel appearing for the 1st Party-Management that the 2nd Party is not a workman under the definition u[s. 2(s) of I.D. Act.

ISSUE NO. II & III

12. When I have come to the conclusion that the 2nd Party is not a workman no findings is necessary in respect of the above two issues because the question of compliance of provision under section 25(s) does not arise when the 2nd Party is not treated as a workman. Tn that case it can not be said that the termination of service of Shri Roul with effect from 6-9-1994 is un-lawful and un-justificd. The 2nd Party is also not en- titled to for any relief.

13. Reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

S. K. DHAL, Presiding Officer

New Delhi, the 25ih July, 2001 him before being finally approved. Reference has been made to Ext.-Q series where Mr. Roul was recommending to the higher authori- ties for confirmation in services of some workman. Ext.-S is the salary slip of Shri Roul. Ext.-T is the organisational chart pre- pared by him and it has been contended that would suggest he was next to the Manager and below to him several other positions in the blasting department. Mr. Nanda, learn- ed Counsel appearing for the 1st Party- Management has invited attention of this Tri- bunal that Ext.-V which is the Mines Fore- man Certificate of competancy issued under the Metaliferous Mines Regulation 1961 where under the defination of mines foreman as per the definition clause regulation 2(19) which says that mines foreman means a per- son possessing a manager's or foreman" certi- ficate and appointed by Manager in writting, under any designation whatsoever to perform the duties of supervision or control in a Mine or part thereof and includes a shift boss. Shri Roul was also recommending the case of the employees working under him for regu- larisation. Reference can be made in this regard to Ext.-X. Shri Roul was a member oi: the delegation of the Management team for discussion with other Management which is found from Ext.-Y & Z. Ext.-GG discloses that Shri Roul was inspecting different places in the mines observing irregularities and suggesting remedial measures. This fact has not been rebutted by the 2nd Party. I am not inclined to agree with Mr. Rastia, learned Counsel appearing for the 2nd Partv that salary would not be a criteria to consi- der whether a person is a workman or not ? If the contention of Mr. Bastia is accepted for argument sake, in my opinion, there should not have any provision in the Industrial Dis- pute Act as revealed from Sub-section IV of section 2(s). But admittedly Shri Roul was drawing Rs. 5,000 towards his wages. In mv opinion from the materials available on record it can be said that Shri Roul (2nd Party) was never doing any manual, un- skilled or skilled, technical and operational or curriculum work. But he was doing super- visory, administrative and managerial work. Rclnncc has been placed by the 1st Partv- Managcment in case of Burmah Shell Oil Storaee r"nd Distributing Co. of Tndia Lid., Vis.-The Burmah Shell Management Stpff Association and others reported in AIR 1971 vSC 92?. Tn that case it was observed lh::£ to find out a person workman or nor; a

S.O. 2117.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Ciovcmmem hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal.

Kola -db shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the¹ employers in relation to the management of R.A.P.P. (Rawat Bhata) and their workman, which was received by the Central Gov- ernment on 20-7-2001.

LNo. L-42011)20|99-IR(M)] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

New Delhi, the 25th July, 2001

S.O. 2118.-—In pursuance of Seetion 17 of th( Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1J947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award oi the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Chenna: as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the managemem of Indian Oil Corporation, Madras and their work- man, which was received by the Central Govcrnmem on 24-7-2001.

[Nd. L-30012j25|98-IR(C-I) S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy

s.

The Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise Ot powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) ana sub-section 2(A) of Section JO of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), have referred the concerned Industrial Dispute for adjudication vide Order No. L-3OO12|25|98-IRi,C-I) dated 21-12-1998.

This reference has been made earlier to the I amil Na|du Industrial Tribunal, where it was taken on lilc as l.D. No. 5|99. When the matter was pending enquiry in that Tribunal, the Govl. oi India, Ministry of Labour was pleased to order transfer of this case rrom that Tribunal to this Tribunal for adjudication. On receipt of records from that Tribnual, the case has been taken on file as l.D. No. 63J2001 and notices were sent to the counsel on record on either side, informing them about the ti ansfer of this case to this Tribunal, with u| direction to appear before this Tribunal on 29-l-20yi. On receipt of notice from this Tribunal, counsel on cidaer side.present with their respective parties and prosecuted this case further.

This matter came up before me for final hearing on 7-6-2001, upon perusing the Claim Statement, Counter Statement, other material papers on record, documentary evidence let in on the side of the Management and upon hearing the arguments of learned" counsel on either side and this matter having stood over till this date for consideraton, this Tribunal has passed the following :—

AWARD

The Industrial Dispute referred to in the above order of reference by the Central Govt. for adjudica- tion by this Tribunal is as follows :—

therefore, they requested the cash section to advise the relevant cash receipt nos. and the date on which ii was issued towards uic cancellation ol demand dians. men the Respondent/corporation made a complaint to the State Bank of India and the baoik informed the Respondent that two of the demand drafts were encashed. The Respondent caused further investiga- tion whioh revealed that the petitioner had surrep- titiously removed tnc nve demand dratts opened a savings bank account in the name of the payee i.e. Lingappa and encashed the two demand dratts for Rs. 61,014.58. When the Petitioner came to know that the fraiud¹ had come to light, he voluntarily wiote a letter confessing that he had removed the demand drafts and that he was prepared to make good the amount. Accordingly, he paiid the sum of Rs. 61,614.58. On 8-3-91, a charge sheet was issued to the petitioner setting out the details of fraud com- milted by the Petitioner and charging him with mis- conduct of theft, misappropriation, dishonesty in con- nection with the Corporation's business]property and acts subversive of discipline. The Petitioner was suspended from duty on 10-7-90 pending disciplinary proceedings by an order dated 10-7-90. The Peti- tioner was called upon to appear for an enquiry in which he admitted the charges. On 3-7-92, the Enquiry Committee gave its report holding that the charges aga|inst the petitioner are proved. On 7-7-92 a second show cause notice was issued proposing the punishment of dismissal. On 14-8-92, the Peti- tioner gave a reply in which he pleaded that because of his family problems, he had to commit the mis- conduct and pleaded for lenience. Alter considering his representation orders were passed on 27-7-1992, dismissing the Petitioner fiom service. Against the order of dismissal the petitioner preferred an appeal which was dismissed on 26-3-93.

"Whether the action of the Management of Indiam Oil Corporation, Madras in dis- missing the strviccs of Shri Haneef Abdul Malik, an Assistant from 27-8-1992 is just, proper and legal ? If not, to what relief is ihc workman entitled ?"

2. The Industrial Dispute between the parties is

briefly as follows :—

3. It is the contention of ihe Petitioner that due to the acute family problems he was forced to commit the alleged misconduct a(nd as a matter of fact the Petitioner had made good all ihe monetary loss to the Respondent | Corporation and there is absolutely no theft, fraud, misappropriation or dishonesty in- volved in so far as the Corporation's business|pro- perty is concerned. Tt is the contention of the Peti- tioner that the Respondcnt/Coiporation, while awarding the punishment of dismissal, had not taken into consideration his long and meritorious services and the fact that he belonged to the minority com- munity. It is also the contention of the Petitioner that the punishment of dismissal inflicted upon him by the Respondent [Corporation is shockingly dis- proportionate extremely out of proportion to the gravity of the offence said to have been committed, especially when the Petitioner had made good all the repbrted temporary handling of cash. The non- employment of the Petitioner caused and brought about by the Respondent|Management is wholly un- justified and unwarranted in the circumstances of the case. Hence, the Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to mod'fy the punishment imposed by the Respondent! Management by exercising power and jurisdiction conferred under Section 11A of the Industrial Dis- putes Act, 1947.

The 1 Party|Workman Sri Haneef Abdul Malik (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner) had joined the services of II Party/Management, Indian Oil Cor- poration Ltd., Chennai, (hereinafter referred to as Respondent) on 31-12-1981 as a Typist cum Clerk and he was posted to work in the Engineering De- partment at the Regional Office. Thereaftci the Petitioner was promoted as Assistant in the year 1987 and was posted in the Regional Accounts Cash Sec- tion. The Petitioner worked" in the Cash section from August, 1988 to Jlunc, 1990 ivnd thereafter he was transferred 1o Input Cell in Southern Regional Office, Madras. On 8-12-89, the Respondent purchased from the State Bank of India, C & I Division, Anna Salai, Chennai, five demand drafts, dratwn on the State Bank of India, Dharwar. On 27-2-90 the said de- mand drafts were returned to the Capital Assets Sec- tion for cancellation. The demnmd drafts were handed over to the cash section for cancellation and crediting the amount. While finalizing the accoun- ting schedules in connection with closing of accounts, the capital assets section ohsuved that necessary credit towards cancellation of the five demand drafts had not been afforded in the respective account codcc and

4. Tt is the contention of the Respondent/Manage- ment in their Counter that the act of misconduct of4406 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA ll, 1923 |PARI II—SEC. 3(ii)] submitted his reply dated 14-8-92. A xerox copy of the same is Ex. M l 5. The linal order has been parsed by the Disciplmary Authority dated 27-8-92 dis- missing the Petitioner lrom the seivjces ot the Corpo- ration with immediate eftcct. A xerox copy ot the same is Ex. M l 6. Then the Petitioner has preferred an appeal against the dismissal order gassed by the Dscipiinary Authority. A xerox copy oi that appeal daica 28-1-93 is Ex. M17. The Appellate Autho- rity passed an order dated 26-3-93 dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner by confirming the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority. The xerox copy of that order is Ex. M l 8.

the petitioner not only caused administrative prob- lems in reconciling the account bat also made an inno- cent officer to face disciplinary action. The family prob- lems can never be a ground for the petitioner to indulge in the misconduct of this nature. I he Central .bureau ot Investigation mterrograLed the Petitioner on 30-5-1990 and immediately thcioarter the petitioner was to mobilise the cash ol Rs. 61,614.58 and make good the money to the Corpoiation. Therefore, if he could mobilise Rs. 61,614.58 within a matter of two days, the misappropriation was deliberate and was resorted to hoping that it would not come to surface. The admission or guilt by the Petitioner and repay- ment of money cannot be said to be a mitigating circumstance. The misconduct committed by the petitioner was serious and warranted the punishment of dismissal. It cannot be said that the punishment was shockingly disproportionate. In view of these fapts there is no justification for this Hon'ble Tribunal to show any indulgence to the petitioner. Hence, an award may be passed¹ rejecting the claim of the petitioner.

5. When the matter was taken up for enquhy, the counsel on either side gave consent to make the docu- ments on the side of the Management as Ex. Ml to Ml8, counsel on cither side had represented that they have no oral evidence to let in. No documentary evidence has been let in on the side ot the Petitioner. Learned counsel on either side have advanced their respective arguments.

6. The Point for my consideration is—

"Whether the action of the Management of Indian Oil Corporation, Madras in dis- missing the services of Shri Haneef Abdul Malik, am Assistant from 27-8-1992 is just, proper and legal? If not, to what ldief is the workman entiled ?"

Point—The Petitioner|Workman Sri Haneef Abdul.

punishment of dismissal and it cannot be said that the punishment was shockingly disproportionate. The Petitioner has not chosen to deny all these averments HI the CouiUei Statement of the Respondent;Manage- ment by filing any re-joinder or reply statement, rather he has plead'ed mercy by requesting this Tribnual to invoke its jurisdiction under section l lA of the In- dustrial Disputes Act to modify the punishment of dismissal imposed by the Disciplinary Authority for his proved misconduct.

10. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has cited a caf,e repented as 1983 (1) LLJ 261, in support of his argument that this Tribnual can invoke the juris- diction under section 11A of the Act to modify the punishment of dismissal from service imposed by the Respondent|Management against the Petitioner. In that ease, it is held that "it is a benevolent power conferred on the Labour Court and has to be exer- cised in the spirit in which the provision has been enacted in oider to further the intendment and pur- pose ol the legislation, keeping aglow before the mental eye some very important dimensions o[ the matter." One such decision has been taken up by the High Court of Gujajrat. Tn thaf case considering the gravity of offence said to have been committed¹ by the employee concerned therein, it is a case v\here-i in trie concerned employee was dismissed from service in respect of two charges namely ( I) absence from duty for about tw0 days without obtaining prior per- mission and (2) theft of scrap materials such as nuts, bolts, screws etc. valued at less than Rs. 50. This decision of the High Court of Gujarat cannot be applicable to the present case because the gravity of the proved misconduct of the petitioner herein is not equivalent to the alleged misconduct of the employee in the cited case. So, the decision of the High Court of Gujarat in the above cited case cannot be applicable to the facts of the present case4408 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27A 1923 [PARI II—SEC. 3(ii)] M5 28-5-91—Xerox copy of letter No. P&A| 1461/356 issued by the Chief Finance Manager to the Petitioner.

M6 16-9-91—Xerox copy of letter No. P&A| 14611356 issued by the Dy. General Manager (Finance) to the Petitioner re- garding re-constitution of enquiry com- mittee.

M7 10-1-92—Xerox copy of letter No. P&Af 14611356 issued by the Dy. General Manager (Finance) to the Petitioner re- garding re-constittuion of enquiry committee ancT Presenting Officer.

M8 17-2-92—Xerox copy of letter No. P&AI 14611356 issued by the Dy. General Manager (Finance) to the Petitioner re- garding rc-nomirn(tion of Presenting Officei.

M9 24-2-92—Xerox copy of inter office memo issued to the Petitioner by the Enquiry Committee Members,

M10 13-3-92—Xerox copy of the notice of enquiry issued by the Enquiry Committee Members to the Petitioner directing him to appear for departmental enquiry.

M il 8-4-92—Xerox copy of the Enquiry Com- mittee Members tetter to the Petitioner en- closing therewith copy of proceedings dated 8-4-92.

M12 12-3-92—Xerox cooy of the Enquiry Pro-

ceedings held on 12-3-92.

rendered by Lhc Madras High Couit as stated above is also quite applicable to the faets of this case. It is hekf in various decisions of the High Court and Supreme Court that power under section 11A of the Act has to be exercised judicially and Industrial Tri- bunal or the Labour Court is expected to interfere with the decision of the Management under section 11A of the Act, only when it is satisfied that the punishment imposed by the Management is highly disproportionate to the degree of guilt of the work- man concerned. Considering all these above deci- sions of High Court and Supreme Court "nd applying the same to the facts of this case, this Tribunal can easily come to the conclusion that the sympathy to the delinquent employee, the Petitioner herein, is uncalled for. From the materials available in this case, it can be easily concluded that the proved mis- conduct committed by the Petitioner was certainly serious which warrants the punishment of dismissal from service ppid it cannot be said¹ that the punish- ment was shockingly disproportionate. Hence under such circumstances, the punishment imposed bv the Respondenf|Management against the Petitioner of dis- missal from service does not warrant anv interefcrence by this Tribunal under section 11A of the Act, since the punishment imposed by the Management is pro- portionate to the degree of guilt of the workman concerned. Hence, it can be easily concluded that the action of the Management of Indian Oil Corpo- ration, Madras in dismissing the services of Sri Haneef Abdul Malik. Assistant from 22-ti-92 is just, proper and leepil. Hence, the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief. Thus, T answer the point accordingly.

Ml 3 3-7-92—Xerox Qopy of the findings of the

enquiry committee against the Petitioner, 13. In the result an award is passed holdinp that the Petitioner is not entitled to the relief prayed for. No Cost.

M l4 7-7-92—Xerox copy of the show-cause notice issued bv the Deputy General Manager (F) to the Petitioner.

New Delhi, the 25th July, 2001

SO 2119.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central G6vernment hereby publishes the award of the Central 'Government Industrial Tribunal, Ahrnedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the empl6yers in relation to the management of ONGC Ltd, and their work- man, which was received by the Central Government on 24-7-2001.

[No. L-20040|39|95-IR(C-I)] S S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEORE SHRI P. R. DAVE, PRESIDING OFFICER, .yNfiUSTklAL TRtBUNAL (CENTRAL) AT AHMEDABAD

Ref (ITC) No. 12 of 1996

ADJUDICATION

BETWEFN

Oil &• Natural Gas Commission, Mehf-ana

. . First party.

Versus

The Workmen employed undci it . . Second Party. In the matter of the demand for treating the work- men of th. Canteen forking at ONGC Ltd., Mehsana as the workmen of ONGC Ltd., Mehsafia and giving them proper relief etc. APPEAFANCES :

Shri K. V. Gadhia, Advocate, for the first party. Slid A. S. Kapoor, Advocate, for the second party

AWARD

This industrial dispute between Oil & Natural Gas Commission, Mehsana and the workmen employed under it has been referred for adjudication u/s 10(1) of the l.D. Act, 1947 to thi\ Tribunal as per the schedule given below by the Desk Office, Ministry of Labour Government of Ifcdla under his No. 20040/39/95-1R dated 22-4-1996 :

"Whether the demand of the union for treating the woikmen. (listed in the enclosed anne- xure) of the Canteen working at ONfGC Ltd., Mehsana as or workmen of ON*GC Ltd , Mehsana is prepared justified ? If so, to what relief the concerned workmen arc entitled to and from which date?"

the ^ItieR <"n

2

ORDER

Both the parties have arrived as a cornpro^JBc and present this settlement before the TriWirtal. Terras of settlement appear just and proper and also in circumstance* of the reference. Hence settlement is recorded and an Awaid in terms of settlement is passed. Secretary, Ahmedabdd, Dated : 5th June, 1999.

P. R. DAVE, Industrial Tribunal BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL At* AHMEDABAD

Reference No 12 of 1996 & No. 48|1999 BETWEEN

The GGM' (Projects), ONGC Limited, Mtihsana Project,

Mehsana and Others.

. • First Party.

AND

Its Workmen employed under it. .. Second Parly. (Through ONGC Employees Union, Mehsana BR. Mehsana) i

It is respectfully submitted that second party had raided the dfspute for treating 14 workmen work- ing in ONGC canteen of Mehsana Project of ONGC as the workmen of the ONdC Ltd. The said dis- pute is referred to it, Afcfnedabad for adjudication by Ministry of Labdur, Govt. of India, New" D^lhi vide Order No. L-2OO40/39y9S-IR(Coaf-I) dated 22-4-96 and was registered as ITC No. 12f96, the schedule of reference being, "Whether the demand of the union for treating the workmen (listed in the enclosed annexure) of the canteen working at ONGC Ltd., Mehsana as the workmen of the ONGC Ltd. Mftnsena is proper and justified? If so, to whAf relief the concerned workmen are entitled to and from wnich date ?"

It is further submitted that during the course of proceedings before Hon'b'le TrtfMnal, it was sub- mitted by the second party that there are total 20 workmen wording in the canteen of ONGC Ltd. Mehsaria ifekte-;, the 14 workmen, the 5 work- men havd approaphed the Hon'ble High Court vide SCA 4279 of 1992 for repularisation. With regard to one workman one Shri RasTunrkant N. Patel has raised the dispute and referred to it, Ahmedabad the schedule of reference as under :

"Whether the demand of the union for treating Shri Ra^luriikant N. Patel working at can- teen of ONGC Ltd., Mehsana as the work- njan of ONGC Ltd. Mehsana and demand for approprir^" vzsjes is proper and justi- fied ? If so, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?"

The said reference is registered as Reference ITC No 48 of 99.

During the neMfttef'tif¹ am r*#fB**eS rfetrf the parties have discussed the issue on various occasions4410 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PAKT II—Sfic. 3(ii)] and finally arrived at amicable settlement and request- ed Hon'ble Tribunal to pass final award in terms of settlement.

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

1. That all the 14 workers whose names art given in the Anncxurc to the lefeiencc shall be absorbed in ONGC as Khalasi Gr. Ill in the pay scale of Rs. 2340/- w.e.f. 10-10-94 with full consequential benefits without any benefits oi whatsoever nature for period earlier to 10-10-94.

2. That the canteen workers named Shri Rasluni- kant N. Patel who is in involved in ITC No. 48 of 99 shall be absorbed in ONGC as Jr. Helper in the pay scale of Rs. 2282 wilh effect from 1-1-97 with full consequential benefits without any benefits of what- soever nature for the period earlier 1-1-97.

3. That the arrears of salary, on account of their absorption w.e.f. 10-10-94 and 1-1-97 in the post of Khalasi Gd. Ill and Jr. Helper respectively shall be worked out after adjusting wapes received by them since 10-10-94 and 1-1-97, the arrears of payment so arrived at shall be paid to them within a period of forty five days from the nV.te of the recording the settlement by the Jnuusmal Tribunal after making •certain deduction as per the law.

4. The first party agrees that arrears payable to the workmen will be spread year wise undef provi- sions continued in Section 89 of Income Tax Act. 5. On ahsojption of these workmen 1 4 +1 = 15 canteen workers shall continue their work in the canteen at Mehsana unless all or any of them arc/is required to be posted elsewhere as per the require- ment of ONGC and these workmen shall have no objection of whatsoever nature in this regard.

6 Tins settlement between the parties is full and final settlement in respect at all 14 + 1 = 15 workmen covered in these reference* and nothing shall survive hereafter the settlement excepting what have been agreed to here in above by both the parties under the settlement. The ONGC Employees Union and all the 15 workmen covered under the references shall not raif.c pny demand or dispute in future against the ONGC Tor any benefits.

7. This <"*nlement is arrived at by both the parties after fully understanding the implications thereof on their own volition and without any misrepresentation for pressure or coercion of whatsoever nature.

'Dated 13th May, 1999.

Ahmcdubad.

Sd|-

Signature of First Party.

Sd|- Signaiure of ihe Advocate of first Party.

Sd|- SignatLiic of Second party of Union.

ORDER

. Both the partie-j are present before me.

New Delhi, the 23id July, 2001

S.O. 2120.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Contnl Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20-7-2001.

TNo. L - 1 2 0 l l / l / 9 9 - I R ( B - I )]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Case No. CGiT;LCIRI211 99

Presiding Officer.—Shri K. M. Rai.

Shri Sharad Joshi, C|o Shri K. C. Raikwai, ,56, Jain Colony, Ratlam (MP).

.. Applicant

Versus

The- General Manager, SBI Local Head Office, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal. The Dy. General Manager, SBI, Zonal Office, Hamidia Road, Bhopal.

. . Non-applicants

AWARD

Passed on this 25th day of June, 2001 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L-12011/1/99-IR (B-I) dated 17-5-99 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by thi, tribunal—

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Sharad Joshi wef. 19-4-97 is Justified ? If not. to what re- lief the workman is entitled ?"4411 2. The workman has submitted aa application praying for the withdrawal of his claim as the mana- gement as given him regular appointment on the post of messenger w.c.f, 29-5-99. He does not want to proceed with the present dispute as his claim has been settled.

3. The workman's application is considered. The management of State Bank of India has given a re- gular appointment on the post of messenger to the workman w.e.f. 29-5-99. In this way his claim has been settled to his satisfaction and No Dispute bet- ween the parties exists any more. In view of this fact. No Dispute Award is passed.

4. On the above said reasons, it is hereby ordered that the management of State Bank of India has given a regular appointment to the workman w.e.f. 29-5-99. Now No Dispute exists between the parties. The workman is satisfied with the appointment on the po;>t of messenger. No Dispute exists between the parties any more. Award is accordingly passed. 5. Copy of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour as per rules.

K. M. RAI, Presiding Officer.

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

SX). 2121.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act. 1947 (H of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cen- tral Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court/ Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20-7-2001.

[No. L-12011/153/87-D.II(A)/IR(B-I)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Ca'sc No. CGIT/LC/R/203/90

Presiding Officer : Shri K. M. Rai.

1. Sureshchandra Gupta, S/o Shri Narsinghlalji, . Gupta, 13, Teachers Colony, Sagod Road, Ratlam (MP).

2. Kamlesh Kothari, S/o Charndrnal Kothari, 2, Palace Road, Ratlam (MP).

3. Ashok Kumar Dangi, S/o Chandmalji Dangi, Chowmukhi Pul, Ratlam.

4. Jagdish Chandra Maheshwari, S/o Ramchandra Maheshwari, 548, Katjunagar, Ratlam (MP).

5. Rajendra Kumar Agarwal, S/o Babulal Agarwal, B/12, Sr. MIG Mhow Road. Ratlam.

6. Ajaya Shah, S/o Shri Chandulal Shah.

Station Road, Ratlam.

7. Jitcndra Shah, S/o Sliri S. M. Shah, 595, Katjunagar, Ratlam. .. . Applicants.

Versus

General Manager, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, Head Office, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. Branch Manager, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, Station Road, Ratlam. ., .Non-applicants,

AWARD

Passed on this 5th day of July, 2001 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L-12011/153/87-D.II(A)/IR(B.III) dated 16th October, 1990 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal—

"Whether the action of the management of the SBI in terminating the services of workmen mentioned in the Annexure and with effect from the dates shown against their name is justified ? If not, to what relief the work- men are entitled ?"

2. The case for the workmen is that they were appointed temporarily as clerk-cum-cashier on vari- ous dates by the Branch Manager, State Bank of IBdkaner and Jaipur, Station Road, Ratlam in the years 1976. 1977, 1978, 1979 and 1980 vide written appointment orders. The services of the workmen were dispensed with by the bank w.e.f. various dates mentioned in Annexure-A. The workmen had not con- tinuously worked against the clear vacancy in the bank for more than 240 days in a preceding year from the date of their termination due to the management's unfair labour practice. They were neither served with the statutory notice nor paid the retrenchment com- pensation according to the provisions of Section 25-F of the I.D. Act, 1947. The Bank had agreed to absorb the workmen in the Bank services with a condition that they shall be treated as fresh employees. Subse- quently the bank refused to abide by the terms of agreement.

3., The workmen further allege that though initially they were appointed for a specific period but their period of employment was extended from time to time. They were regularly performing -. the duty of a clerk in the baok. Their services were not automatically ter- minated after the expiry of period of employment. Different persons junior to the workmen were appoint- ed against the clear vacancies and the services of work- men were not regularised by the Bank. The manage- ment did not follow the principle of First come last4412 THE GAZETTE OF INtHA . AUQUST 18, 20Ol/$RAVANA 27a 1923 [PART Ij—SEC. 3(li)J

44 li

ANNEXURE

BEFQRJJ THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT I^DtfSJfRJA*- JRAPi|NAL-"U¥-L^3QyR CQU£T, J^BAWUR

Case No. CGIT/LC/R/238/9J

Presiding Officer : Shri K. M. Rai. Shri Ganagfa S/o Sbri Puwwrial N*vasi Fawodi, PO : Turanvida, District : Betul.

. .Appbcant.

Versus

The Divisiontd Railway Manager, Central Railway, Nagp^r

. . Non-o ppfroant.

AWARD

Passed *>n this 26th day of June, £001 1. The {lawfnment of India, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L-41

"Whether the action of the management of Cen- tral Railway, Nag^ur jn t$npwpti$g the service of Si#i Qajiesh, 5/^> $jiii Pjjrsmlal is justified ? If not, what relief he *> entitled to?"

2. The case for iJw workman is that initially iae was appointed as casual labour under PWIr Central Rail- way, Kalaskar during the period 1980-81. Thereafter he was apflpifl/ed as Cfaogman w.e.f. 26-10-82 a"4 con%j,Q^.y worked till 2-8r8& when hie seryu&es were iermjoated b^ the Railway. Hp had flitflined the status of tejnpprary worker f o r d i ng U> Railway rules as he ha4 coj^jououely wqrked for 4 months. After attaining the tpmgprary stylus., the worker js selected as nKmthly rated casual labour after undergoing m

3. The workman further allege that he was given House Rent in lieu of quarter by the railways. The other faculties were also provided to him by the. map.- agement- After Treating him as a regular employee, he was removed from scrvipe without assigning any reasQn by the management. He was not given one month nqtice, prior to termination of his sejpviee as requir-od under Section 25-F of the LD. Act. In view of this fact, his retrenchment is void and deserves tp be quashed. He had continuously worked for more than 24Q days in a calendar year pr<"cetling tho date of IH'H termination froni pervipe. Hjs sejevio^s had been terminated in violation ol Sections %$*$> Q and H of the I.D. Act, 19^k Taking these facts into consi- deration, the termination prder should be quashed and all the consequential benefits should be allowed to b" given-

4. The case for the management is that the work- man claims lo have bcerj appointed by the PWI, Cen- tral Railway, Kalaskar on 26-10-82, wfajUb he pro- duced ttw service card allegwt to have b#cn. W"ip4 by th" ?Wi, Murtaiapur. fra ihn wny the worfecowj had spoused the employm^^ by pioducnjg a fo^gect service "ard "nd played irauti on ihe managBiwiK. Such appointment dees -not create any right to the post. In view of this fact, the workman is not •entitled to ttay relief as claimed by hkn.

5. The following iaaws ari"e for decision in this case :—

1. Whether the services of the workman were tHtWdJgr ;t#tminat"d toy ihe Ceatnfl Raflwny, Nfigpur -w^ei. 2-'&%B7

2. Whether the workman is entitled to reinstate- ment with baok wages ?

3. Relief and costs ?

6. Issue Nos. 1 and 2 : The workman claims to have been appointed as casual worker by like fWI, Central Railway, Kalaskai during Ihe psriod 1990^*1. Thereafter he was appointed as GangjnaH w.eX 2fith October 1^82. The service card Ex M-I wm aHeged to have been issued to him by the PWI, Murtazapur. No service card was issued to him by the PWI, Cen- tral Railway, KalasJtar on 26-1G-&2. After the veri- fication, this card was found to be In gpavdtu>. On the bas*s of such in genuine service card, the work- man cannot claim light to the post. The very basis for securing employment tn the Railway is in genuine and therefore on this basis, the workman cannot be regularised on the post he was working til! the date of his termination. He is, therefore, not entitled to any- reflrf as claimed by him. His termination order is perfectly valid and docs not deserve any interfer- ence. Issue Nos. 1 and 2 are answered accordingly.

7. Issue No. 3 : In view of my finding given on issue Nos, 1 and 2, the workman is not entitled to reinstatement with back wages. The reference is ac- cordingly answered In favour of the management and against the workman.

8. Copy of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour, Government of India as per rules.

K. M. RAI, Presiding Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2J23.—In pursuance of Seution 11 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award¹ of the Cen- tral Goafemmaat DBtestriat Tri&uaal/&abgur Count, Jabalpttc m sirown to the Anrromire' in the irMfuSEnal Dispute betwero tire *nproyer"r in rettetorr to tM4414 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] management of Central Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20-7-2001.

[No. L-41012/58/88-D-2(B)/IR(B-I)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT/LC/R/149/89

Presiding Officer : Shri K. M. Rai. Shri Komal Chand, S/o Daduram, R/o Village Pounia, Tahsil Sihora, District Jabalpur.

. .Applicant.

Versus

The Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railway, Jabalpur

. . .Non-applicant.

AWARD

Passed on this 26th day of June, 200 J 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L-41012/58/88-D-2(B) dated 1-8-89 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal—

"Whether the management Central Railway, Jabalpur has justified to terminate the ser- vice of Mr. Komal Chand S/o Shri Daduram w.e.f. 1-5-86 ? If not, then the concerned workman is entitled to what relief ?" 2. The case for the workman is that he was emp- loyed on the post of casual Khalasi at Katni Railway Workshop by the Central Railway on 1-1-85. He was working on daily wage basis under IOW(M), Work- shop at Katni. On 17-5-85, he met with an accident during the discharge of his duty and this accident caused grievious injury on his person. Several frac- tures were caused to him due to this accident. After the accident, the Railway authorities shifted him to the Railway Hospital, Katni for necessary treatment and thereafter he was shifted to Divisional Railway Hospital at Jabalpur for further treatment. He was under treatment at Railway Hospital till 30-4-86. He was issued fitness certificate on 30-4-86 to resume his duty. He reported to his duty on 1-5-86 but the IOW(M) Workshop, Katni did not allow him to join his duty in pursuance of the fitness certificate. The Central Railway on the other hand terminated his services without assigning any reason and giving any written order.

3. The workman further alleges that he was in con- tinuous service for more than 240 days in a calendar year preceding the date of his termination and- there- fore he had attained the status of temporary employee. The period of absence from duty shall be treated to be on duty as he was under continuous treatment hi the Railway Hospital for his grievious injuries. He was recommended by the competent doctor for light duty. The management has illegally terminated his services in violation of the provisions oi Section 25-F of the I.D. Act, 1947 and Railway Rules No. 2503. In view of all these facts, the termination order de- serves to be quashed and the workman is entitled to all consequential benefits attached to the post.

4. The case for the management is that the work- man was engaged as casual labour by the Chief IOW (M), Katni on 1-1-85. He had not attained the status of temporary employee as claimed by him. Due to grievious injuries caused on his person, he was declar- ed unfit by M.S., Central Railway, Jabalpur for the post of Khalasi and issued certificate dated 30-4-86 in respect thereof. The workman was declared unfit by the competent doctor and therefore he cannot be reinstated in the instant case. He is not entitled to any relief as claimed by him. He had been given all the payments whatever due to him as per rules. He was given retrenchment compensation Rs. 375. In view of all these facts, the workman cannot claim reinstatement with other consequential benefits in this case.

5. The following issues arise for decision and my findings thereon are given hereinafter—

1. Whether the termination order passed by the management on 1-5-86 against the workman is illegal.

2. Whether the workman is entitled to reinstate- ment with odier consequential benefits.

3. Relief and costs?

6. Issue Nos. 1 and 2 : Admittedly the workman was employed as casual khalasi by the CPWI(M), Central Railway, Workshop, Katni on 1-1-85. His appointment was temporary and on daily wage basis. On 17-5-85, he met with an accident during the dis- charge of his duty and sustained grievious injuries on his person. His knee was fractured due to this accident and therefore he was admitted in the Railway Hospital at Katni for treatment. Thereafter he was shifted to Divisional Railway Hospital at Jabalpur for further treatment. He remained continuously on treatment w.e.f. 17-5-85 till 30-4-86. During this period he was not fit to perform his duty as it is evident from the medical certificate Exhibit~M issuer] by the Medical Superintendent. Railway Hospital, Jabalpur. According to the provisions of Section 25- B ( l) of I.D. Act, 1947 the workman shall be treated to be on duty during the period of his treatment. The Section reads as under :—

"A workman shall be said to be- in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sick- ness or authorise leave or an accident, or a strike which is not illegal, or a lockout or a cessation of Work which is not duti to any fault on the part of the workman." 7. The above said provisions clearly goes to prove that the workman was in continuous service from the date of accident i.e. 17-5-85 till 30*4-86 as he was admitted in the hospital for the treatment of his in- juries sustained by him during the accident. In this4415 way, the workman continuously worked with the man- agement for more than 240 days in a year preceding the date of his termination i.e. 1-5-86.

8. It is an admitted fact that the retrenchment com- pensation of Rs. 375 was given to the workman after the termination of his service and during the conci- liation proceedings pending before ALC(C), Jabalpur. The subsequent payment of compensation will not fulfil the requirement of Section 25-F of the I.D. Act in case of retrenchment of any workman by the emp- loyer. The subsequent payment of compensation will not help the management in any manner to prove their defence. In such a circumstance, it is held that the retrenchment compensation of Rs. 375 was paid to the workman by the Railway after the termination of his service without complying with the provisions of Section 25-F of the I.D. Act, 1947.

9. Tn the circumstances of the case, we have to sec as to whether the termination of the workman amounts to retrenchment in the light of definition given under Section 2(oo)(c) of the I.D. Act which is as under:—

"Retrenchment means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason w h a t e v er otherwise than as a punishment infl'ctcJ by way of disciplinary action, but docs not include •-—

a

b

bb

c. termination of ihe .service of a workman on the ground of continued ill-health.

Jn this connection the contention of the management is that tjic terminatit.:i oi workman does not amount to retrenchment on the ground of his continued ill- health as he was medically unfit to discharge his duty as khalasi. The management has relied on the certi- ficate Ex. M-8 issued by the Medical Supdt., Railway Hospital, Jabalpur on 30-4-86. This certificate goes to show thai, the workman was unfit to discharge his duty. In this connection, the management's witness Dr. P. C. Khulve has clearly stated that during the acci- dent, his femcr bone was fractured and he was unable to perform his duty as there was no symptom of improvement in his condition any more. In such a circumstance, the continued ill-health shall include_the incapacity to execute the work which is necessary for discharging the duty in question by the workman. The medical evidence clearly goes to show that the work- man was unable to perform his normal duty as khalasi and therefore the case of v/orkman shall be covered by the definition continued ill-health. In such a condi- tion, the termination of service of the workman cannot be said to be retrenchment as it is covered by the exception clause mentioned earlier. The workman has failed to prove by adducing expert evidence of any competent doctor to show that he was medically fit to perform his normal duty as khalasi. The burden was on him to prove his medical fitness to establish his claim. He has failed to discharge his duty in this case. Hen^e he cannot be said to be medically fit to discharge his normal duty any more in the employ- ment,

10. The workman has tried to establish that the Railway Doctor had advised to give him the light duty taking his condition into consideration. There is no-" thing on record to show that which type of duty should have been given to him by the employer. At the same time the workman claims himself to be fit. In this way it shall not be appropriate to hold that the work- man was medically fit to discharge his duty and he cannot be said to be suffering from continued ill- health. Hence his termination docs not amount to retrenchment in the instant case.

11. In the light of the foregoing reasons, it is held that the termination of workman is perfectly legal and it is covered by Section 2(oo)(c) of the I.D. Act. It docs not amount to retrenchment. The management was not required to comply with the provisions of Section 25-F of the T.D. Act by paying retrenchment compensation of the workman prior to terminating his services. The workman has been paid all the dues whatever due to him by the Railways and therefore he is not entitled to any monetary benefits also. Issue Nos. 1 and 2 are answered accordingly,

12. Issue No. 3 : In view of my finding given on Issue Nos. 1 and 2, it is held that the termination of service of the workman by the Railway is perfectly legal. He is not entitled to reinstatement with any other monetary benefits whatsoever. He is not entitled to any benefits as claimed by him. In this way the refer- ence is answered in favour of the management and against the workman.

13. Copy of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour, Government of Tndia as per rules.

K. M. RAI, Presiding Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2124.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cen- tral Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Indus- trial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16th July, 2001.

[No. L-22012/8/F/91-IR(C-Il)J

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer4416 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA"-: A U O ^ S* 1", 200JySRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART H-^SufJ. >(ii)] AJttrextrRe-

BEFOR&SHRl B. L. JATAV, PRESIDING O^ICER, CE^RAL oovfiRN^Nt INDUSfftl A ir T&IBUN AL-£\)U

K. L. Kadianu C /o The Distt. Secretary, FCI, Employees Congress, C/o, O/o District Manager, FCI; Rtfhtak.

. .Woricraan.

Vs.

The Sr, Rfegitmal Manager, PCI, Ha*yana Region,

Sector-17, Chandigarh.

APPBARANCES :

For the Workman.—Wotkman in <• person For the Management.—Kalam Singh

AWARD

(Passed on 18-6J2OG1)

The Central Government vide ^Gazette Notification No. L-22OL2(8[F|9U1R(C'II) dated 27th of June, 1^91 • has referred the following dispute to this Tri- bWal for adjudication :—

"Whether the action of the management of FCT in relation to their Zonal Office, Nevv Delhi in not allowing the promotion to Shri'K. L. Kadmn. to the post of T.A. Grade 1 from 1976 is just and fair? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled lo and from what date ?"

2, As pei cHIm stn'sment filed by the workman, his case is that he ioined the FCI on 15-9-1 WO as tech- nical assistant grade-Ill at Bhiwani. He was promoted to the post of technical assistant grade-II from 1st July, 1972. He was elected as Unit Secretary in FCI Employee-, I fnu-n 'Ih.wju. The management took it otherwise in o nK to mar the career of the work- man. During the year 1974, false acquisition were •nade against the workman by the authorities of the management by fabricating lalsc evidence. The charges could not be proved by the manageniht diking the (.oursc of enquiry so, the workman was cxenorjted ham all the charges. His case was considered during the year 197ft' for his promotion as technical assistant prade-T. His name was taken on the penal but on account of persona! animosities on the parte of some \cbted imprests, the workman was superseded and lunior most employees wei'c promoted to the post of technical assistant grade-1. The action of the irfaftagfc- ment was against the principle of n a w al justice. He -nadf several representations to the management but tl*ese were rejected. Ho was again placed on 1979 Tve-ril and promotion order^ were issued on 19-9-7777 but these orders were n6t implemented by the nianage- ment. His name was included'in the peftaT of 1979. He was promoted as teeBntanl assistant grade-I on 18-10-1982. He protested against the action of the management but his representations were rejected by the senior manager of the management. The action taftcn bf-t&e'ri{indgfen"nf is'-an example of victimisa- tion of the workman and high handedness on the part rtthe'malfogtaMM. Top mstioft'of the man*ft*rttent'was unfair, arbitrary and illegal. Therefore, the daim of the workman be allowed and t h e' mauagatoeat be directed to make the promotion of the workman as technical assistant graffa-I w'.'e.f. 3-4-1976 wi(h bapk wages and' all oth6r cbrise<}trential benefits arising tMetfeupon.

J. The* marftgatfient has raised in its wHfteh state- merit pfWinfmaty oWJ"etidns alfcgttig tniat the d a ta of the wd-fktttaft is belated and htf-id ndt thcVofRBftan uftdCr the previsions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore, his claim is hot maJrrtalnable. The daiffrof the wtfrlt!m*n is also not maifrtaJnaWe in the rjrfci^nt fdrm as the petsons au*Cfldy promoted as teehHltfal assistant gr^ade-I smce 3*4-1976 have nx# yeetf^iriaae party to this petition. The clatia is liaWe to be dis- missed on this store aldne.

4. The management ha3 contended in written state- ment that¹ the nahft: of the worknian was placed'on 1976 penal for h)s promotion to the post of tefchhMal assistant grade-I but he was not found fit'by SJflal Promotion Committee on account of the bad service record of the workman. Eligible persons were promot- ed to the post of technical assistant grade-I on the basis of fitness-cum-seniority, thus the action of the management was nt>t arbitrary and prejudicial. The authorities of the management, had not abused their administrative powers in not promoting the workman. The management acted updn the prin- ciple of natural justice. The leprcsentations made by the workman were without substance. Therefore, no action was taken in favour of the workman. He was again considered for promotion during the year 1977- 78 but he was not found fit by Zonal Promotion Committee for promotion. His naAie was also includ- ed in the list of ad^bJoc promotion during th" yfar 1977 but ad^hoc promotion could not be made with- out verifying the service record of the workman by ZPC. Consequently he was promoted to the pdflt of technical assistant graded on 1IMOJ1982. The man- agement has acted by following the principle of flatu- ral justice." The workiflart is not entitled for prttWWtfAn to the post of technical assistant grade-I w.e.i 3rd April, 1976. Thwreforet his claim deserves to be dismissed.

5. The workman has filed replication in reply to the written statement filed by the management. It has been pleaded that preliminary objection raised by the management arc irrelevant, superflous and untenable in the eyes of law. Other facts have also been re-asserted in this replication.

6. The workman has fil"d his affidavit Ex: W i. He has not filed ^iny document in support of h" datei. The maaaRement has filed the affidavit of District Manager Bhim Singh Rana which is Ex. M l. The management has al"o relied on the documents exhibit- ed as Ex. M2 to M6-. The workman has deposed that he vMS elected as Unit Secretary of the Union so. the* authorities of the management became prejudiced aftamst him doe to- h" union activities. His name was taken on the promotion • penai of 1976 for his pro- motion from the post of tetfhrrical assistant grade^TI to the post of technical assistant grade-I but due to personal ill will he was superseded and junior emp^4417 loyees were promoted to the post of technical assis- tant Grade-I, In the penal of 1977 his name was also included for promotion to the post of T.A. grade-I but he was nol promoted. Again his name was includ- ed in the penal of 1979 and he was promoted on 18-10-1986 from the post of T.A. Grade-II to the post of T.A. Gradc-1. Thus the management has Jicted illegally and against the principle of natural jus- tice in not promoting him during the year 1976. Therefore, the management be directed to promote him w.c.f. 3-4-1976.

7. The witness of the management has deposed that during the year 1973 the work of the workman was not found satisfactory. Adverse remarks was passed against him in the ACR of 1973. Zonal Promotion Committee was constituted under the pi escribed regu- lation for the promotion of T.A.. Grade-II lo the post of T.A. Grade-I. That promotion committee did not find the workman lit for promotion so lie could not be promoted during the year 1976, Other employees who were juniors to the workman were promoted be- cause they were found fit for promotion by the pro- motion committee. Later on his name was included in the panel of 1977 but on the ground of adverse remarks in ACR of 1973, he could not be promoted. Again his name was included in the panel of 1979 and the promotion committee recommended his case for promotion. Consequently he was promoted to the post of T.A. Grade-f during the year 1980.

8. The claim of the workman is based on the plea of victimization and personal malice of the authorities of the management, The management has denied this fact in written statement and in the affidavit of wit- ness. The photo copy of ACR of 1973 has been filed) which is Ex. M4 in which the adverse remarks have been given relating to his punctuality discipline and temprament. The plea of prejudice and personal ill will is not reliable. The name of the workman was included by the authorities in the panel of 1976, 1977 and 1979. If the authorities had any personal ill will, the name of the workman for promotion would not have been included in the promotion panel of subsc- quentl years. The documents showing the union acti- vities of the workman have been exhibited by the workman during the course of the cross-examination of Shri Bhim Singh Rana which arc Ex, W2 and W3. The comniaint made by the workman against Asstt. Manager Shri Aman Singh of which details were asiced from the workman has been exhibited as Ex. W4. Ex. W2 and W3 relates to the year 1973 and the com- plaint against Aman Singh relates to the year 1974. Even though the name of the workman was included in the panel of 1976, 1977 and 1979 for promotion but Zonal Promotion Committee did not recommend his case for promotion so it can not be said that the management has acted prejudicially agairust the work- man with intent to harass him. The adverse remarks passed in ACR 1973 have not been expunged by the management. No documents and the copy of the re- presentation has been submitted in this case to indi- cate that the efforts were made bv the workman to ?et the adversp remarks exnunced. This Tribunal has no ground to interfere in the order passed diving the Vfsar 1976 nio-Tse-ding the workman for promotion.

9. The workman has filed written arguments in sup- port of his case. The management has also filed 24" 5 C,\ 2(101 -36

counter arguments. In the arguments the workman has given the details of complaint filed against Aman Singh but in the claim statement and replication no, specific averments has been made. The management has also controverted the fact relating to the alleged miscon- duct of Aman Singh but in written statement and in the affidavit of Bhim Singh Rana no details have been given. Under these circumstances, the arguments can not be considered for want of pleudings and evidence.

10. The management has raised preliminary objec- tion that the applicant workman is not a 'workman' under the definition of workman given in I.D. Act, 1947 His salary is above Rs, 1600 and he is per- forming the duties of supervisory and managerial na- ture. The copy of the appendix-I of Regulations 10 of Staff Regulation, 1971, (Ex. M3) has been filed by the management, in which the; pay scale of technical assistant grade-I has been given which is Rs 450— 850. The maximum limit of this pay scale is below Rs. 1600. In this respect the management has filed affidavit of Asstt. Manager S. B. Nimesh which is Ex. M8. Alongwith his affidavit copy of the salary control register has been attached in which the basic pay of the workman has been shown Rs. 1600 per month. But this register relates to the year 1991 whereas the claim of the workman relates to the year 1976. In cross-examination, he has also deposed that he did no* know whether the workman had been exercising any managerial powers. The witness of the manage- ment M. I,. Sharma, District Manager, has deposed in his cross-examination that he does not know whe- ther the workman has powers to record ACR or to sanction leave to junior officials. He has also admitted in his cross-examination that the post of the assistant manager is higher post to the post of technical assis- tant gradc-T. The workman has filed the copy of the job description part-I in which the duties of the Asstt. Manager and technical assistant has been given. On perusal and comparison of these duties, it is evident that the technical assistant grade-I is not discharging supervisory and managerial duties. Therefore, it can not be held that the applicant is not a workman as defined in the I.D. Act, 1947.

11. The preliminary objection has been raised by the management that the daim of the workman is belated, therefore, it is not maintainable. The 4418 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PARI J l —S EC 3(ii)]

12. The workman hat, cited the case of State of Haryana Vs. Shri P. C. Wadhwa, IPS [1987(2) S.L.R. 393J in which Hon'ble Supreme Couit has held that the whole object ol' making the adveivj remarks would be lost if they arc communicated to the ollirer con- cerned with an inoidinate delay. This case law relaics to the Inspector General of Police. Rules have been framed for the communication of adverse remarks. But in the case of the workman the period for the communication of adverse remarks has not been shown so that this case law does not support the case of the workman. The workman has also cited the ease of Vaid Nath Mahapatra Vs. The State of Orissa [1989(1) SLR 2201. This case law relates to the communication of adverse remarks under rule 7 of Orissa Service Code. The facts of this case law are different to those of the case under consideration. So this case law is not applicable in this case,

13. The evidence adduced by both the parties has been appreciated in the preceding paragraph of this award. After considering al.l the facts and the cir- cumstances, this Tribunal has arrived to the conclu- sion that the action taken by the /flanaeemenl in not allowirm the promotion lo the workman to the post of T.A. Grade-I from 1976 is just and fair. Therefore, the workman is not entitled to get any relief. Conse- quently the reference is answered that the action of the management in not allowing the promotion to the workman to the post of T.A. Grade-] from 1976 is just and fair and the workman is not entitled to any relief. The parties shall bear their own costs. Appro- priate Government be informed.

Chandigarh,

18-6-2001.

B. L. JATAV, Presiding Officer New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O. 2125.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cen- tral Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Godavarikhani as shown in the Annexure in the In- dustrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16th Julv. 2001.

[No. L-22012/25/2001-IR(C-IT)l

N, P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT :

Sri P. Gurunadha Rao, B.Sc, B.L., Chairman- cum-Presiding ORiccr.

Monday, the 2nd Day of July, 2001 Industrial Dispute No. 93 of 1999

BETWEEN

Md. Dastagiri, S/o Haji Mia, 43 yrs., Ex-Dumper Operator, H. No. 13-3-142. Phatak Street, P.O. Warangal, District Warangal, A.P.-506002. .Petitioner.

AND

1. The Project Officer

S.C. Co. Ltd., OCP-I1, Ramagundam, District Karimnagar.

2. The General Manager,

S.C. Co. Ltd., OCP-U and III, Ramagundam, PO. Godavarikhani-505209. District Karimnagar.

3. The Chairman and Managing Director,

Singarcni Collieries Co. Ltd., PO, Kothafjudem, Distt. Khammam

. .Respondents.

This petition coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri K, V. N. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner and of Sri C. S. N. Reddy, Advocate for the respondents and having stood over for considera- tion till I his date, the court passed the following: —

AWARD

1. This is a petition filed U / s. 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as amended by A.P., Amendment Act, 1987.

Facts of the case briefly arc as follows : —

The petitioner was working as Dumper Operator in the respondents company. On 4-1 -94, he worked in third shift. He did not see the death of Madar Sab. cable boy on that day. On 5-1-94, he WHS in- formed that the dead body of Madar Sab, a Cable Boy, was found while operating P-2 Shovel. Violance erupted. Most of the workers of the third shift were beaten suspecting their involvement in the death of Madar Sab. He was advised not to come to the pro- ject spot. On 1 1-1-94, he was beaten by some work- ers. He was taken to the police station. One Easwar Reddv, Dozer Operator confessed that he was respon- sible for the death of Madar Sab. On 7-2-94, charge- sheet was issued against him alleging that he connived with others an-l concealed the evidence of death of Madar Sab. On 10-2-94 hr reported for duty, but he was beaten bv workers. He was hospitalised for the injuries received by him. Ex-parte enquiry was condcted and he was dismissed from the service with effect from 14-7-94.

2. Respondents filed counter stating that the peti- tioner was working as E, P. Operator on H.D. 7 Dumper. On 4-1-94 in the night shift, the petitioner4419 was working on P-2 shovel. On 5-1-94 the dead body of Madar Sab was found. Police conducted enquiry. It was found that while working on P. 3 shovel, the shovel bucket hit Madar Sab. The petitioner did not report the matter to the higher authorities. He remov- ed the dead bodty of Madar Sab to P-2 shovel and concealed the dead body with over-burden material.

Domestic enquiry was conducted. The petitioner did not attend to the enquiry inspite of receiving enquiry notices. Ex-partc enquiry was conducted.

3. Ex. W-l to Ex. W-12 and Ex. M-l to Ex. M-8 are marked.

4. Heard both sides.

5. The point for consideration is whether the charge against the petitioner is proved, if so, whether the punishment of dismissal of the petitioner from ihe service is in proportion to the charge.

6. Point : Ex. M-l is charge-sheet. The charge is that one Madar Sab died due to hit by P-3 shovel bucket operated by Sk. Ahmed. The petitioner con- nived with Sk. Ahmed in concealing the dead body of Madar Sab, threatened other workers not to reveal the incident and not reported the death of Madar Sab to the higher authorities'.

7. The petitioner was operating P-2 shovel on 4th January, 1994. The deceased Madar Sab was hit by !P-3 shovel bucket operated by Sk. Ahmed. The dead body was concealed under the dump. It was not informed to the higher authorities. The petitioner con- nived with Sk. Ahmed in concealing the dead body. The petitioner remained ex-parte in the enquiry. It was proved that the petitioner connived with Sk. Ahmed in concealing the dead body of Madar Sab and not reporting the same to the higher authorities.

8. lhc petitioner was dismissed from the service \\.c.f. 11-7-94.

The petitioner filed the present petition on 16-6-99, i.e., about 5 years after the dismissal of the petitioner. The petitioner could not point out any irregularities in the enquiry. The petitioner has to blame himself for his absence in the enquiry.

I consider Hint the charge against the petitioner is proved and the punishment of dismissal of the peti- tioner from the service is in proportion to the charge.

Hence, I answer the point accordingly.

In the lesull, this petition is dismissed, The order of dismissal of the petitioner from the service is con- firmed. Each paity do bear their own costs.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this, 2nd day of July, 2001.

P. GIJRUNADHA RAO, Chairman-cum-PiesiJing

Officer APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined :

For Wdikman : For Management ' Nil. Nil.

EXHIBITS

For workman : —

Ex. W-l dt, 9-1-94—Enquiry notice xer. copy.

Ex. W-2 dt. 17-7-95—Memorandum, xcr. copy.

Ex. W-3 dt. 13-5-95—Statement of the petition- er, xcr. copy.

Ex. W-4 dt. 16-2-95—C.C., of judgement in C.C. No. 69/94, xcr. copy.

Ex. W-5 dt. 5-9-97—Representation of the Sin- gareni opencast all E.P. Operators Associa- tion, xer. copy.

Ex. W-6 dt. 4-6-96—Appeal for re-instatement of four E.P. Operators of OCP-II Reg. xer. copy alongwilh Nija Nirdharana Committee enquiry report.

•Ex. W-7 dt. 2-1-95—Lr. addiesscd to the Com- missioner, Nija Nirdharana Committee, Go- davarikhani by P. Mallesh, xer. copy.

Ex. W-8 dt. 10-1-96—Lr. addreV^d to the Addl. Director General of CBCID, Hyderabad by M. Mallesham, M.L.A., Godavarikhani, xer. copy.

Ex. W-9 dt. 13-5-95—Statement of Sri Sk.

Ahmed, E, P, Operator xerox copy.

Ex. W-10 dt. — —Lr. addressed to Sri Bala- g6pal, General Secretary, A.P.C.L.C. by P. Mallesh and 3 others xer. copy.

Ex. W-ll dt. 17-1-94—Lr. addressed to the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar by D. Madhava Rcddy, Working President.

E \. W-12 dt. -- —Lr. addressed to the Com- missioner, Nija Nirdarana Committee Goda- varikhani by P. Mallesh, E. P. Operator, OCP-1T xer. copy.

For Management ; —

Ex. M-l dt. 7-2-94—Chaige-sbcet with ack.

Ex. M-2 dt. 26-2-94—Enquiry notice with ack.

Ex. M-3 df 7-3-94—Enquiry notice with aek.

Ex. M-4 dt. 18-3-94—Enquiiy notice with ack.

Ex. M-5 dt. 6/30-3-94—Enquiry proceedings.

Ex. M-6 dt. 5-5-94—Enquiry report alongwith statements of the witnesses.

I;A. M-7 dl. 5-6-94—Second show cause notice with ack.

Ex, M-8 dt. 1 1-7-94-—Dismissal older nf the petitioner.

4410 THE GAZETTE OF TNDIA ; AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001

S.O 2126.—In pursuance oi Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes AcL, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes I he award of the Cen- tral Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Godavarikhani as shown in the Annexure in the In- dustrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16th July, 2001.

|No. L-22012/25/2001-lR(C-ll)l N. P. KESAVAN, Desk OITicci

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT :

Sri P. Gurunadha Rao, B.Sc. B.L., Chairman- cum-Presiding Officer.

Monday, the 2nd day of July, 2001 Industrial Dispute No. 95 of 1999

BETWEEN

Pasarakonda Mallesh, S/o Chandraiah, Age 41 yrs., Ex-Dumper Operator, R/o H. No. 17J5/D, Vittal Nagar Godavarikhani, District Karimnagar-505214.

. . Petitioner.

AND

1. The Project Officer,

S.C. Co. Ltd., OCP-II, Ramagundam, District Karimnagar,

,2. The General Manager,

S.C. Co. Ltd., OCP-U and III, Ramagundam, P.O. Godavarikhani, District Karimnagar, A.P.-505209.

3. The Chairman and Managing Director,

Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., PO: Kothagudem, District Khammam.

. . Respondents.

This petition coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri K. V. N. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner and of Sri C. S. N. Reddy, Advocate for the respondents and having stood over for consi- deration till this date, the court passed the follow- ing :—

AWARD

1. This is a petition filed U/s 2-A(2) of the Indus- trial Disputes Act, 1947, as amended by A.P., Amend- ment Act, 1987.

Facts of the case briefly are as follows :—

The petitioner was working as Dumper Operator. On 4-1-94, the petitioner worked in third shift and operated the dumper for P-2 and P-3 shovels along- with seven other Dumper Operators. On 4-1-94 in the third shift, he did not observe anything about the death of Madar Sab, a cable boy. On 7-2-94, charge- sheet was issued against him alleging that he connived with others in concealing the evidence of death of Madar Sab, cable boy. Domestic enquiry was conduct- ed. He remained ex-parte in the enquiry. He was dismissed from the service w.e.f. 7-8-94.

2. Respondents filed counter stating that the peti- tioner was working as E,P. Operator on.35-T dumper. On 4-1-94 in the night shift, the petitioner worked on Dumper No, 26 attached to P-3 shovel. On 5th January, 1994 in the 1st shift at about 9-30 A.M.. the dead body of Madar Sab was found. Police con- ducted enquiry. It was revealed that due to careless and negligent operation of P-3 shovel operator, the shovel bucket hit Madar Sab around 2.30 A.M., and caused his death. The petitioner removed the dead body of Madar Sab to P-2 shovel, in conniv;/ice with three other operators and covered with over-burden material of P-3 shovel. Domestic enquiry was con- ducted. The petitioner submitted his explanation to the charge-sheet. The petitioner did not attend to enquiry in spite of receiving enquiry notices.

3. Ex. W-l to Ex. W-12 and Ex. M-l to Ex. M-J3 are marked.

4. Heard both sides.

5. The point for considertion is whether the charge against the petitioner is proved, if so, whether the punishment of dismissal of the petitioner from the service is in proportion to the charge.

5A. Point : Ex. M-l is charge-sheet. The charge is that one Madar Sab died due to hit by P-3 shovel bucket operated by Sliaik Ahmed. The petitioner con- nived with Sk. Ahmed in concealing the dead body of Madar Sab, threatened other workers not to reveal the incident and not reported the death of Madar Sab to the higher authorities.

6. The petitioner was operating Dumper on 4-1-94, The deceased Madar Sab was hit by P-3 shovel bucket operated by Sk. Ahmed. The dead body was con- cealed under the dump. U was not informed to the higher authorities. The petitioner connived with Shaik Ahmed in concealing the dead body. The petitioner remained ex-parte in the enquiry. Tt was proved that the petitioner was connived wilh Sk. Ahmed in con- cealing the dead body of Madar Sab and not report- ing to the higher authorities.

7. The petitioner was dismissed from the service w.e.f. 7-8-94. The petitioner filed the present petition on 16-6-99, i.e. about more than 4 years 10 months after the dismissal of the petitioner. The petitioner could not point out any irregularities in the enquiry. The petitioner has to blame himself for his absence in the enquiry.

I consider that the charge against the petitioner is proved and the punishment of dismissal of the peti- tioner from the service is in proportion to the charge. Hence, I answer the point accordingly.

Jn the result, this P^ilion is dismissed. The order of dismissal of the petitioner from the service is con- firmed. Each party do bear their own costs.

Typed to my dictation corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this, 2nd dny of July, 2001.

P. GURUNADHA RAO, Chairman-cum-

Presiding OJIJ CI APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined :

For Workman :—Nil For Management :—Nil.

EXHIBITS

For Workman :—•

Ex. W-l dt. 9-1-94—Enquiry notice xerox copy.

Ex. W-2 dt. 17-7-95—Memorandum issued by B. Nagaiah, General Secretary.

Ex. W-3 dt. 13-5-95—Statement of Sri Md. Das- tagiri, E.P, Operatoi xer. copy.

Ex. W-4 dt. 16-2-95— Judgement copy in C.C No. 69/94 xer. copy.

Ex. W-5 dt. 5-9-95—Lr. addressed to the Chair- man and Managing Director, S.C.C. Ltd., Kothagudem by the Presicleni of the Singa- reni OCP all E.P. Operators Association, xer. copy.

Ex. W-6 dt. 4-6-96—Appeal for rc-instatement of four E.P. Operators to OCP-II, Reg. xer. copy and Nija Nirdharaua Committee en- quiry report.

Ex. W-7 dt. 24-3-95—Lr. addressed to the Chair- man and M.P., SCCL, Hyderabad by M. Damodar Reddy, Minister for Mines and Geology xer. copy.

Ex. W-8 dt. 10-1-96—Lr. addressed to the Addl. Director of General, CBCTD, Hyderabad by Sri M. Mallesh, M.L.A. of Madaram Cons- tituency, Karirnnagar District xer, copy.

Ex. W-9 dt. —Report of Sri Sk. Ahmed, E.P. Operator xer. copy.

Ex. W-10 dt. —Lr. addressed to Sri Bala Gopal, General Secretary, State APCLC by P. Mallesh and 3 others,

Ex. W-ll dt. 17-1-94—Lr. addressed to the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar by D- Madhava Reddy, Working President.

Ex. W-12 dt. 2-1-95—Lr. addressed to the Com- missioner, Nija Nirdharana Committee, Go- davarikhani by P. Mallesh, E.P, Operator.

For Management :—

Ex. M-l dt. 7-2-94—Charge-sheet alongwjth ack.

Ex. M-2 dt. 10-2-94—Reply to the charge-sheet.

Ex. M-3 dt. 20-2-94—Enquiry notice alongwith ack.

44 U Ex. M-4 dt. 2-3-94—Enquiry notice with postal returned cover with ack.

Ex, M-5 dt. 12-3-94—Enquiry notice with regis- tered cover returned unserved by postal department.

Ex. M-6 dt. 1-4-94—Udayam telugu newspaper clipping.

Ex. M-7 dt. 6-4-94—Notification issued in Eenadu Telugu Newspaper for enquiry.

Ex. M-8 dt. 1/6-4-94—Enquiry proceedings.

Ex. M-9 dt. 10-6-94—-Enquiry report alongwith statements of witnesses etc.

Ex. M-10 dt. 12-7-94—Second show cause notice.

Ex. M-l 1 dt. 20-7-94—Representation of the petitioner.

Ex. M-L2 dt. 2-8-94—Lr. issued to the petitioner by G.M., OCP-I1 and III.

Ex. M-13 dt. 4-8-94—Dismissal order.

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001 S.O. 2127. In puisuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Cen- tral Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Godavarikhani, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in rela- tion to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-7-2001.

[No. L-22012/25/2001-lR(C-II)]

N. P. KESHVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRI- BUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT :

Sri P. Gurunadha Rao, B.Se , B.L,, Chairman- cum-Presiding Officer.

Monday, the 2nd day of July, .2001 Industrial Dispute No. 96 of 19994422 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [P\Rf I I —S EC 3(ii)j BETWEEN

B:uid:i Piabhykar Goud, Ex. E.P, Operator, S/o Narsa Goud, Age 34 years, R /o T2-200, Centenary Colony of Kamanpur Mandal of Karimnagar, District-505 212. Petitioner

AND

1. The Project Officer,

S. C. Co. Ltd., OCP-II, Ramagundam, District Karimnagar.

2. The General Manager,

S. C. Co. Ltd., OCP-II & III. Ramagundam, PO : Godivarikhani, District Karimnagur, A.P.-505 209.

3. The Chairman and Managing Directm.

Singarcni Collieries Co. Ltd., P.O. : Ko'hngudem, District Klnramam.

. . .Respondents.

This petition coming befoie me for final hearing in the presence of Sri K. V. N. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner and of Sri C. S, N. Rcddy, Advocate for the respondents and having stood over for consi- deration till this date, the court passed the follow- ing:—

AWARD

1. This is a petition filed U/s. 2-A(2) of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947, as amended by A.P., Amendment Act, 1987, Facts of the case briefly are as follows :—

The petitioner was working as F..P. Operator. On 4-1-94, the petitioner worked on P-2 shovel in \h? third shift. He did not observe the death oi' Madar Saheb in his shift. Charge-sheet was issued against Turn. He submitted explanation. Domestic enquiry Vvas conducted. He was dismissed from the '•crvice w.e.f. 14-5-95.

2. Respondent filed counter stating that ihc peti- tioner was working as E.P. Operator. On 4-1-9^ i'.i the night shift, the petitioner worked on P-2 show] On 5-1-94, in the first shift, at about 9.30 a.m., P-2 shovel operator found the dead body of Madar Saheb, a cable boy. who worked on P-3 shovel in thi. ni<>ht shift. Police conducted enquiry. Tt was found th^t due to careless and negligent operation of P-3 shovel by its operator, the shovel bucket hil Madar Saheb around 2.30 a.m., and caused his death. The petitio- ner instead of reporting ihz matter to the higher authorities, removed (he de.ul body to P-2 shovel work place in connivance wiih three other operators and covered the dead body with over burden mate- rial of P-3 shovel. Chaige-sheet was issued against the petitioner, Tbi petitioner submitted explanation to the charge-sheet, Domestic enquiry was conducted. The petitioner participated in the enquiry. Ch.mic against the petitioner was proved. Show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner submitted explanation to the show-cause notice. The petitioner was dismissed from the service.

3. Ex. W-l to Ex. W-12 nr>d T M-1 to Fx. M-L) are marked.

4. Heard boih sides.

5. The point for consi'Jcraf'on is whether the charge against Hie putit'uner h prince!, if io, whether the punishment of removal cf the petitioner from the service is in proportion to the charge.

6. Point: Ex. M-l is chirge-sheei.

The charge is that ore V'.Tkir Saheb died due tr> hit by P-3 shove] bucket operated by Shaik Ahmed, The petitioner connived with Shaik Ahmed in con- cealing the dead body of Madar Suheb, threatened other workers not to reveal the incident and not re- ported the death of Madar Salieb to the higher ait'ln- rities.

7. The petitioner v/as working on P-2 sivjvel on 4-1-94. The deceased Madar Saheb was hit by P-3 shovel bucket operated by Shaik Ahmed. The dead body was concealed under the dump. It was not in- formal to the higher authoring. The petitioner con- nived with Shaik Ahmed in conceding the dead body. The petitioner participated in the enquiry, ll was proved that the petitioner connived with Shaik Ahmed in concealing the dead body of Madar Sal.eb and not repoiting the same to the higher authorities.

8. The petitioner was dismissed from the service w.e.f. 14-5-95, The peiHione; filed the present peti- tion on 16-6-99, i.e., more than four years after the 'dismissal of the petitioner. The petitioner could not point-out any irregularities in the enquiry.

T consider that the charge against the petitioner is proved and the punishment of dismissal of the peti- tioner from the service is in proportion to the charge. Hence, I answer the point 'Accordingly.

In the result, this petition is dismissed. The oidc" of dismissal of the petitioner from the service is con- firmed. Each party do bear their own costs.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this, 2nd day nf July, 2001.

P. GURUNADHA RAO, Chnirman-cum-

Presiding OfTicer Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined :

For workman—Nil.

For Management—Nil.

EXHIBITS

For workman :

Fx. W-l dt. 9-1-94—Enquiiy notice xenx copy.

Ex. W-2 di. 17-7-95—Memorandum issued by 13, Njigni ill Geneial Secretary.

Fx. W-3 dt. 13-5-95—Report of Md. Dastagiii, E.P. Operator, Xerox copy,

Ex, W-4 dt. 16-2-95—Copy of judgement in C.C. No. 69/94.

4423

TI\. V/-5 dt. 5-9-97 -I r. .-Jdresse-d M Mi^ Ch ir- man and Managing Diiec

Ex. W-6 dt 4-6-96—Lr. addressed to the Ch.'ii- ma,i and Managing Director, SCCL, HyJtra- bad and Nija Nirdhaiana Conmi t jj enquiry report xercK copy.

H>. W-7 di. 24 3-95—I r. addressed to the Chairman & Managing Director, SCCL, Hyderabad by Sri' M. D.unodur RrJdy, Minister for M^e- & Geology xerox copy, Ex. W-8 dt. 10-1-96--Lr. nck'r-. -d 1c (lie Ar'dl. Director cf General CBCTD, Hv-'-'^ltfd by M. Mallesham, M[ A, GoJavinl hap'.

Ex. W-9 dt — —Si iVment or Sk. Ahnvxi, E.P. Operator.

Ex, W-10 dt. — —I r. addrc.M-d to Sii Bala Gopal, General S.ccne+ary, \PCl_C by P. Mallaiah and 1 o'hers.

Ex. W-12 dt, -- -~!.r at'cicved tc the Commissinner, Nij.i Nirdharano Committee. Gndavavikhani by P Mallaiah, F P f)ne- niior, OCP-II.

For Managem?nt:

Kx. M-l dt. 7-2-94—Cliarf;,:-.sheet with nek., Ex. M-2 dt. 20-2-94—T^olatiption to the charge- sheet.

Fx. M-3 dt. 20-2-9 4—Enquiry notice Ex. M-A dt. 17-2 X -,\pphc .it, (t ,'•: peti- tioner.

Fx. M-5 dt. 27-2-94/1 5-1-04- -T-irqmiy prcr-ed- ings.

Ex. M-6 dt. 3-7-94—Fnq lirv report alongwiih statements.

Ex. M-7 dt. 18-7-94—Second show c-iu.'e notice.

Ex. M-8 dt. 12-8-94 - Representation of the petitioner.

Ex. M-9 dt 7-5-95—Dismissal ord'-T.

New Delhi, the 23rd Ju'v, 2001 SO. 2128—In pMrimrce of Section 17 nf the T.idLis'rcl Di?mi> /Nrf, 1Q47 (14 of 1047). the Cenlrd Govern"ient hereby pabli^hss the award of Cenlial GovemnieiH Industrial riilnmal/l iibour Court, Godnviirikhani, as shown in the Anmexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in rela- tion to the management of SCCL and then workman, winch was received by the Central Government on 16-7-2(KM.

[No. L-22012/25/2001-IR(C-TT)l

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRT- BUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT. GODAVARIKH\NI

PRESENT :

Sri P, Gurunadha Rao, B.Sc, B.L., Chairman- cum-Presiding Officer

Tuesday, the 3rd day of July, 2001 Industrial Dispute No. 132 of 1999

BETWEEN

Amniisetty Thimpathi, S/o Mallaiah, 36 years, Ex-Coal Filler, E-Code No. 0901353, R/o Nagunooi village & post, Mandal & District Kaiimnagar A.P.

. . . Petitioner.

AND

1. The Chief General Manager,

Singareni Collieries Co. LM., Ramagundam Division-I. PO : Godavarikhani, District Kanmnagar, A.P.

2. The Superintendent of Mines,

C.DK. No, 2 Incline, PO : Godavarikhani, District Kaiimnagar A.P.

. . .Respondents.

This petition coming befoie me for final hearing in the presence of the petitioner, but his Advocate and Advocate for respondents absent and having "tocd over foi consideration till this date, the court passed the following :•—

AWARD

1. This is a petition filed U/-i. 2-A(2) of thr In- dustrial Disputes Act. 1947, as amended by A.P., Amendment Act, 1987.

Facts of the case briefly are as follower—

The petitioner was appointed as Coal Filler w.e.f. 1-1-95. He was absent for mor- than 300 davs in the vcar. 1997 without anv application for leave. Charpc-sheet was issued again^i him. Domestic en- oniry was conducted The n-tiiioner narticioated in thi^ maiiiry. He was dismissed from service w.e.f. 16-9-90.

2. Respondents filed counter.

3. Pi'li'iover present. His Advocat" absent. Advoca*c f(¹r respondents absent.

Ex W-1 to Ex. W-10 and Ex !ST-1 to Fx. M-11 are marted.

4424 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 18, 2001/SRAVANA 27, 1923 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. The point for consideration is whether the charge against the petitioner is proved, if so, whether the punishment of dismissal of the petitioner ffom the service is in proportion to the charge.

5, Point.—Ex, M-2 is chai^e-shect. The pelilioncr had put-in only 64 musters in the year, 1997. He was absent for the remaining days without any appli- cation for leave.

Ex. M-3 is explanation to the charge-shed. The petitioner stated that he was suflimnp from I 'leer and Jaundice. The petitioner admitted that he was absent for more than 300 days in the year, 1997. He further stated that he applied for sick leave and leave T>n loss of pay. But there is no evidenee to show that the petitioner applied for any leave in the year. 1997. The petitioner participated in the enquiry. He was dismissed from the service w.e.f. 16-0-99.

I consider that the charge against the petitioner is proved and the punishment of dismissal of the peti- tioner from the service is in proportion to the charge.

In the result, this petition is dismissed. The order of dismissal of the petitioner from th<\ service '>*•con- firmed. Each party to beafr their own costs.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this, 3rd clay of July, 2001.

P. GURUNADHA RAO, Chairman-cum-

Presiding Officer Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined :

For workman—Nil. For Management—Nil.

Exhibits

For workman :

Ex. W-l dt. 19-9-99—Fit ceitificafe issued by Medical Superintendent, Area Hospital, xerox copy.

Ex. W-2 dt. 20-5-99—Fit certificate issued by Medical Officer, SCCL, xerox copy.

Ex. W-3 dl. 25-11-98—Fit certificate addressed to Superintendent, of Mines, GDK 2-A In- cline by Medical Superintendent, Area Hos- pital, xerox copy.

Ex. VV-4 dt. 13-11-98—Lr. directing the petitio- ner for medical examination in the company hospital, xerox copy.

Ex. W-5 dt. 7-11-98—Fit certificate issued by Dy. Civil Surgeon, District HQRS, Hospital, Karimnagar xerox copy.

Ex. W-6 dt. — —Treatment particulars given by the company Area Hospital during Nov- ember, 1998, xerox copy.

Ex. W-7 dt. 20-10-85—Office order (xerox copy).

Ex. W-8 dt. 17/19-1-95—Office order (xerox copy).

Ex. W-9 dt. 3G-8-95—Confirmation letter xerox copy.

Ex. W-10 dt. 18-3-99—Lr. issued to the petitio- ner by S.O.M , GDK, 2A Incline, xerox copy.

For Management :

Ex. M-J dt. 13-8-97—-Oljice-memo xerox copy.

Ex. M-2 dt. 30-7-98—Charge-sheet.

Ex. M-3 dt. 6-8-98—Explanation to the charge- sheet.

Ex. M4 dt. 4-9-98—Enquiry notice.

Ex, M-5 dt. 10-9-98—Domestic enquiry proceed- ings.

Ex. M-6 dt. 11-9-98—Enquiry report.

Ex. M-7 dt. 11-2-99—Show-cause notice, Ex. M-8 dt. 3-3-99—Acknowledgement.

Ex. M-9 dt, 4-3-99—Representation of the peti- tioner.

Ex. M-10 dt. 29-3-99—Mercy petition of the pet'riionei.

Fx. M-l 1 dt. 14-9-99—Dismissal order.

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2001 S.O. 2129.—In pursuant, of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal|Labour Court, Godavarikhani as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in re- lation to the management of SCCL and their work- man, which was received by the Central Government on 16-7-2001.

[No, L-22012|25|2001-IR(C-II)1 N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRTBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, GODAVARTKHANT

PRESENT :

Sri. P. Gurunadha Rao, R S c, B.L., Chairman- cum-Fresiding Officer.

Tuesday, the 3rd Dalv of Julv, 2001 Industrial Dispute No, 21 of 1999 BETWEEN

Thanduboina Dutgiiah So Banaidh, 28 yrs., Ex-Coal^iHer, E.C. No. 2636297, R|o. Malikarjunagar, R. K. Piiram, C|o. Vishweshwar Rao Pingale, Advocate, Godavarikhani.

-Petitioner.

AND

The General Manager, S C. Co. Ltd., R. K. Puram, Majndamarri, Dist. Adilabad. —Respondent.

I P' Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this, 3rd day of July, 2001.

P. GURUNADHA RAO, Chairman-cum-Frcsidihg Officer

TD No. 21|99

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses-examined For workman : For Management:

—Nil— — N i l-

Exhibits

For workman :—

—Nil—

This petition coming bcfoie me for final hearing in the presence of Sri. V. Venkateswar, Advocate for P. V. Rao, Advocate representing petitioner, but counsel for the respondent absent and¹ having stood over lor eonsick'icition till this date, the court passed the following:—

AWARD

1. This is a petition filed U|s. 2-A(2) of the In- dus^iad Disputes Act, 1947, as amended by A. P., Amendment Act, 1987.

For Management: —

Ex. M-l dt. — —Attendance particulars of the petitioner for the year, 1996.

Ex. M-2 dt. 22-1-97—Charge-sheet.

Ex. M-3 dt. 11-6-97—Office-order. Ex. M-4 dt. 24-6-97—Enquiry notice Ex. M-5 dt. 12-7-97— — d o- Ex, M-6 dt. 16-7-97—Enquiry proceedings". Ex. M-7 dt. —Enquiry report. Ex. M-8 dt. 27-7-98—Lr. addressed to the- peti- tioner by the General Manager, RKP.

Ex M-9 dt. 3-8 98—Ack.,