REGD. NO . D. L. - 33001/ 99 रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी० एल०-33001 /99
सस्यमेव जयते
भारत राजपत्र का The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
सं. 6 ]
नई दिल्ली, शनिवार , मार्च 8 , 2003 /फाल्गुन 17, 1924
No. 6]
NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, MARCH 8 , 2003/PHALGUNA 17, 1924
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II-खण्ड 3- उप- खण्ड ( iii) PART II-Section 3-Sub- section(iii)
केन्द्रीय अधिकारियों ( संघ राज्य क्षेत्र प्रशासनों को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किये गये आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Orders and Notifications issued by Central Authorities ( other than the Administrations of Union Territories)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS भारत निर्वाचन आयोग नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी, 2003
(Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) Friday, the 31st day of January 2003 CORAM:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice A. Ramamurthi Election Petition No. 9 of 2000 आ. अ. 15.-लोक प्रतिनिधित्व अधिनियम, 1951 ( 1951 का43 ) की धारा 106 के अनुसरण में, भारत निर्वाचन आयोग, निर्वाचन अर्जी सं. 2000 का 09 में, मद्रास उच्च न्यायालय के तारीख 31 जनवरी, 2003के निर्णय/आदेश/ रिपोर्ट को एतद्वारा प्रकाशित करता है ।
Petitioner
SenthilRaja
(इस अधिसूचना के अंग्रेजी भाग में छपा है । )
Vs.
[सं० 82/त.ना. लो.सं./09/2000 ]
1. M. Chinnasamy
आदेश से,
2. K. Natrayan
तपस कुमार, सचिव
3 . K. Sathiyamoorthy
4. M. Chinnasamy
5. C. Srinivasan
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
6. K.C. Palanisamy
New Delhi , the 20th February, 2003
7. R.M. Dhayalan
8. S. Balakrishnan
9. T. Mathivanan
10. M. Kanagaraj
O. N. 15. In pursuance of section 106 of the Rep- resentation ofthe People Act, 1951 ( 43 of 1951 ) , the Elec- tion Commission hereby publishes the order of the High Court ofMadras dated 31-01-2003 in Election Petition No. 09 of2000 .
488 GI /2003
(93) 94
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 8 , 2003 /PHẠC GUNA 17, 1924
11. M. Palaniappan .
Respondents 12. The Returning Officer/District Collector, No. 26, Karur Parliamentary Constituency
(R12-has been struck off from the array of parties as per the order ofthis Hon'ble Court in Q.A. No. 29 of 2002 in Election Petition No. 9 of 2000 dated 28-1-2002) Petition praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to:
(i) direct the 12th respondent and other officers to forthwith conduct scrutiny and re -count ofallthe ballot papers in respect of the elections conducted in Karur Parliamentary Constituency.
(ii) declare the election of the first respondent as null and void and as having been procured by corrupt means and setaside the same .
The above Election Petition coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence of Mr. K. Ravindranath, Counsel for the petitiorier and of Mr. N. Srinivasan, Counsel for the 1st respondent and of Mr. K.
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( iii) ] Ethirajalu , Counsel for the 2nd respondent and the 12th respondent has already been deleted from the array of respondents herein and respondents 3 to 11 not appearing in persons or through Advocates and upon persuing the Memo dt . 31-1-2003 filed by the petitioner 's' counsel this Courtmade the following ORDER:
Memo filedby the learned counsel for the petitioner reporting " no instructions " . The petitioner also called absent. Election Petition is dismissed for default.
Witness the Hon'ble Thiru BOLLAMPALLY SUBHASHAN REDDY, Chief Justice at Madras aforesaid, this the 31st day of January 2003.
Sd/-
(K. KARUPPIAH)
Assistant Registrar, Original Side-II .
No. 82 /TN - LA/09/2000]
ByOrder,
TAPAS KUMAR, Secy.
Printed by the Manager , Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .