रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी० एल०-33001 / 99
REGD. NO . D. L. -33001/99 भारतको राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 27 ]
No. 27 ]
1
नई दिल्ली, जून 29 जुलाई 5, 2003 शनिवार/आषाढ़ 8-आषाढ़ 14, 1925 NEW DELHI, JUNE 29 - JULY 5, 2003 SATURDAY/ASADHA 8- ASADHA 14, 1925
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II-खण्ड 3 -उप- खण्ड (ii) PART II-Section 3-Sub- section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
मंत्रिमंडल सचिवालय
CABINET SECRETARIAT New Delhi , the 24th June , 2003
नईदिल्ली, 24 जून, 2003
का.आ. 1811.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए सीमा केडिया बनाम उड़ीसा राज्य तथा अन्यों के मामले में आपराधिक प्रकीर्ण मामला सं. 5221/2002 में उड़ीसा उच्च न्यायालय , कटक द्वारा पारित दिनांक 11-12-2002 के निर्णय के अनुपालन में भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 342; 306 और 34 के अधीन पुलिस स्टेशन सम्बलपुर टाउन, जिला - सम्बलपुर, उड़ीसा पर पंजीकृत मामला एफआईआर सं. 260/2000 दिनांक26-7-2000 और उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों , दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उड़ीसा राज्य पर करती है ।
S.O. 1811. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act . No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government to comply with the judgement dated 11-12-2002 passed by the Orissa High Court, Cuttack in criminal misc . case No. 5221 of 2000 in the case of Seema Kedia Vs. State of Orissa and others , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members ofDelhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State ofOrissa for investigation of the case FIR No. 260/ 2000 dated 26-7-2000 registered at Police Station Sambalpur Town, District Sambalpur , Orissa under Sections 342 , 306 and 34 of Indian Pencal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and attempts , abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection the offence mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[सं. 228/49/2003-डी.एस.पी.ई. ]
[No. 228/49/2003 - DSPE ] भाष्कर खुल्बे , निदेशक
BHASKAR KHULBE , Director 1734 GI/ 2003
(4693) 4694
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14, 1925
नईदिल्ली, 24 जून, 2003
का.आ. 1812.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 75 पीसीआर, 2003 दिनांक 29-5-2003 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से श्री प्रबीर कुमार बोस , महाप्रबंधक, नेटवर्क सर्विसिज यूनिट, आईटीआई, बंगलौर कॉम्पलेक्स और किन्हीं अन्य लोकसेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरूद्ध भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठितं धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( ई ) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों तथा उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एकअथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध और अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं. 228/53 /2003 -डी.एस.पी.ई. ]
भाष्कर खुल्बे, निदेशक New Delhi , the 24th June , 2003 S.O. 1812. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 , read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act . No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 75 PCR 2003 dated 29-5-2003 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offences against Shri Prabir Kumar Bose, General Manager , Network Services Unit , ITI , Bangalore Complex and any other public servants or persons punishable under section 13 (2 ) read with 13 ( 1 ) ( e ) of Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 ( Act No. 49 of 1988 ) and attempts , abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with one or more ofthe offence mentioned above and any other offence and offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[No. 228/53 /2003 - DSPE ]
BHASKAR KHULBE , Director नई दिल्ली, 24 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1813.- केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार के गृह ( पुलिस ) सैक्शन -4 की अधिसूचना सं. 4151 ख/6-पु-4-2003 लखनऊ दिनांक 17-6-2003 द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार की सहमति से दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार संपूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर पुलिस स्टेशन महानगर, लखनऊ में दर्ज हुए अपराध सं. 162/2003 दिनांक 9- 5-2003के अंतर्गत धारा 302 भारतीय दंड संहिता से संबंधित कु. मधुमिता शुक्ला, लखनऊ की हत्या के संबंध में और उपर्युक्त अपराध से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्न , दुष्प्रेरण और षडयंत्र तथा वैसे ही संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में अथवा उन्हींतथ्यों से उद्भूत किया गया अथवा किए गए किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए करती है ।
[सं. 228/54/ 2003 -डी.एस.पी.ई. ]
भाष्कर खुल्बे, निदेशक
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 24th June , 2003
S.O. 1813. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( I ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act. No. 25 of1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Uttar Pradesh , Home (Police) Section-4 vide Notification No. 4151 Kha/6 -P-4-2003 Lucknow dated 17-6-2003 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh forinvestigation of Crime No. 162/2003 dated 9-5-2003, registered at Police Station Mahanagar, Lucknow under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) regarding murder of Ms. Madhumita Shukla at Lucknow and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the above offence and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[No. 228/54/2003 - DSPE] BHASKAR KHULBE, Director नई दिल्ली, 25 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1814.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केरल राज्य सरकार के गृह ( एस. एस. ए. ) विभाग की दिनांक 17-5-2003 की अधिसूचना सं. 44440 /एसएसए-2/ 2002/गृह द्वारा केरल राज्य सरकार की सहमति से निम्नलिखित प्रकरणों में :
( 1 ) फोरेस्टर मूसा की शिकायत पर एस. बाथेरि पुलिस स्टेशन, जिला व्यानाड, केरल में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 (1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धाराओं 143 , 147, 148, 447, 341 , 324, 353, 365 और 149 के अधीन दर्ज अपराध सं. 71/2003
(II ) उप निरीक्षक, श्री पी. विश्वाम्बरन की शिकायत पर एस. बाथेरि पुलिस स्टेशन, जिला व्यानाड, केरल में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धाराओं 143 , 147, 148 , 353 , 366, 342 और 149 के अधौन दर्ज अपराध सं. 76/2003
1 ( III ) श्री पी. विजयन, फोरेस्ट रेंज अधिकारी की शिकायत पर एस. बाथेरि पुलिस स्टेशन , जिला व्यानाड, केरल में भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45) की धाराओं 143, 147 , 148 , 342 , 353 , 366 और 149 के अधीन दर्ज अपराध सं . 77/2003
(IV ) श्री के. वी. सतीशन, उप पुलिस अधीक्षक, मन्नथवाड़ी की शिकायत पर एस. बाथेरि पुलिस स्टेशन, जिला व्यानाड, केरल में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धाराओं 143, 147 , 148 , 120ख , 332, 353 , 307 और 149 के अधीन दर्ज अपराध सं. 78/2003
(V ) श्री के. वी. सतीशन, उप पुलिस अधीक्षक, मन्नथवाड़ी की शिकायत पर एस . बाथेरि पुलिस स्टेशन , जिला व्यानाड, केरल में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का [ भाग ] भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4695 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5,, 2003/ आषाढ़ 14, 1925
अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धाराओं 143, 147, 148, 506, 353, 120ख , और 149 के अधीन दर्ज अपराध सं. 79/2003
Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at S. Bathery Police Station Wayanad District, Kerala on the complainant of K. V. Satheesan , Dy. SP. Mananthavady.
(VI ) श्री के. वी. सतीशन , उप पुलिस अधीक्षक, मन्नथवाड़ी की शिकायत पर एस . बाथेरि पुलिस स्टेशन , जिला व्यानाड, केरल में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धाराओं 143 , 147, 148 , 120ख, 342, 364, 302 और 149 के अधीन दर्ज अपराध सं. 80/2003
(VI) Crime No. 80/2003 under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 120B, 342 , 364, 302 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at S. Bathery Police Station Wayanad District , Kerala on the complainant ofK. V. Satheesan , Dy. SP. Mananthavady.
And attempts , abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence and offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts ,
तथा उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरण और षडयंत्र तथा उसी व्यवहार केअनुक्रम मेंकिए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध और अपराधों केअन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण केरल राज्य पर करती है ।
[No. 228/33 /2003 -DSPEJ [सं. 228/33/2003 - डी.एस.पी.ई. ]
BHASKAR KHULBE , Director
नई दिल्ली , 25 जून, 2003
भाष्कर खुल्बे , निदेशक New Delhi , the 25th June , 2003
का.आ. 1815.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को विचारण न्यायालयों में निदेशक, केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के. अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में कोलकाता में संस्थित मामलों के अभियोजन तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/ पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है :-
S.O. 1814. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 , read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Ac. No. 25 of 1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Kerala Home ( SSA) Department vide Notification No. 44440/ SSA2 / 2002/ Home dated 17-5-2003 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Kerala for investigation of the following cases:-
सर्वश्री
1. राजाराम मिश्रा
2. शिशिर कुमार घोष
3. स्वपन नाग
(I) Crime No. 71/2003 under Sections 143 , 147, 148,447, 341 , 324, 353 , 365 an d 149 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) registered at S. Bathery Police Station Wayanad District , Kerala on the complainant of Forester Moosa .
4. सौमेंद्र घोष
5. धर्म नाथ चौबे
6. तपश बसु
7. श्यामल कुमार घोष
8. श्रीमती रेखा सेन
(II) Crime No. 76/2003 under Se ctions 143 , 147 , 148 , 353 , 366, 342 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at S. Bathery Police Station Wayanad District , Kerala on the complainant of S I Shri P. Viswambaran.
9. सूरज्याकांत रे
10. अगलेंद्र चक्रवर्ती
[सं. 225/37/ 2002-डी.एस.पी.ई. ( i) ]
भाष्कर खुल्बे , निदेशक (III ) Crime No. 77/2003 under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 342 , 353 , 366 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( Act No. 45 of 1.8: 60 ) registered at S. Bathery Police Station Wayanad District, Kerala on the complainant of IP. Vijayan , Forest RangeOfficer .
New Delhi , the 25th June , 2003 (IV) Crime No. 78/2003 under Sections 143 , 147 , 148, 120B, 332 , 353 , 307 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at S. Bathery Police Station Wayanad District , Kerala on the complainant of K. V. Satheesan, Dy. SP. Mananthavady.
(V) Crime No. 79/2003 under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 506 , 353 , 120 B and 149 of the Indian Penal
S.O. 1815. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 8 ) of Section 24 , of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 ( Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment ( CBI) in the State of West Bengal at Kolkata as entrusted to them by the Director , Central Bureau of 4696
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 25 जून , 2003
Investigation, in the trial Courts and appeals / revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate Courts established by law.
S/Shri
1. Rajaram Mishra
2. Sishir Kumar Ghosh
3. Swapan Nag
4. Saumendra Ghosh
5. Dharam Nath Choubey
6. Taposh Bosu
7. Shymal Kumar Ghosh
का.आ. 1817.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को विचारण न्यायालयों में निदेशक, केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के. अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में जलपाईगुड़ी में संस्थित मामलों के अभियोजन तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/ पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है : -
8. Smt. Rekha Sen
सर्वश्री
9. Surjya Kanta Ray
1. सुब्रांशु चाकी
10. Amalender Chakraborty
2. अमिताव गांगुली
[No. 225/37/2002 -DSPE ( i ) ] BHASKAR KHULBE , Director नई दिल्ली, 25 जून , 2003
[सं. 225/37/2002 - डी.एस.पी.ई. ( iii ) ] भाष्कर खुल्बे, निदेशक New Delhi , the 25th June , 2003 का.आ. 1816.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को विचारण न्यायालयों में निदेशक, केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के. अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में हावड़ा में संस्थित मामलों के अभियोजन तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है : -
सर्वश्री
S.O. 1817. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section (8 ) of Section 24 , of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI ) in the State of West Bengal at Jalpaiguri as entrusted to them by the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation , in the trial Courts and appeals/ revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate Courts established by law.
S/ Shri
1. चिन्मय चौधरी
1. Subhransu Chaki
2. सनातन मुखोपाध्याय
2. Amitava Ganguly
3. मिहिर बनर्जी
[No. 225/37/2002-DSPE ( iii ) ] BHASKAR KHULBE , Director [सं. 225/37/2002- डी.एस.पी.ई. (ii ) ] भाष्कर खुल्बे, निदेशक
नई दिल्ली, 25 जून , 2003
New Delhi , the 25th June , 2003
का.आ. 1818.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को विचारण न्यायालयों में निदेशक , केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के. अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा पोर्टब्लेयर में संस्थित मामलों के अभियोजन तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है :-
S.O. 1816. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (8 ) of Section 24 , of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI ) in the State of West Bengal at Howrah as entrusted to them by the Director , Central Bureau of Investigation , in the trial Courts and appeals/ revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate Courts established by law.
सर्वश्री
S/Shri
1. आशीष कुमार रे
1. Chinmoy Choudhary
2. आर. शिव सरूप
2. Sanatan Mukhapadhyay
3. नदीम अख्तर खान
3. Mihir Banerjee
[No. 225/37 /2002 -DSPE ( ii) ] BHASKAR KHULBE , Director
[सं. 225/37/2002 - डी.एस.पी.ई. ( iv) ] भाष्कर खुल्बे , निदेशक [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4697
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5,, 2003/ आषाढ़ 14, 1925
New Delhi , the 25th June , 2003 S.O. 1818.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 8 ) of Section 24, of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment ( CBI ) at Port Blair as entrusted to them by the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation , in the trial Courts and appeals/revisions or other matter arising out ofthese cases in revisional or appellate Courts established bylaw.
S/ Shri
1. Ashish Kumar Ray
2. R. Shiv Saroop
3. Nadeem Akhatar Khan
[No. 225/37/2002-DSPE ( iv) ] BHASKAR KHULBE , Director नई दिल्ली, 25 जून, 2003
का.आ. 1819.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्री प्रदीप कुमार गोस्वामी, अधिवक्ता को विचारण न्यायालयों में निदेशक, केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना (के. अ . ब्यूरो ) द्वारा पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में आसनसोल में संस्थित मामलों के अभियोजन तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिएविशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[सं. 225/37/2002- डी.एस.पी.ई. (v) ] भाष्कर खुल्बे, निदेशक New Delhi , the 25th June , 2003 S.O. 1819. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (8) of Section 24, of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Pradip Kumar Goswami Advocate as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special .Police Establishment (CBI) in the State ofWest Bengal at Asansol as entrusted to them by the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation , in the trial Courts and appeals/ revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate Courts established by law.
[No. 225/37/2002 -DSPE ( v) ] BHASKAR KHULBE , Director नई दिल्ली, 25 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1820.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्री दीपांकर डे, अधिवक्ता को विचारण न्यायालयों में निदेशक, केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के. अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में दार्जिलिंग में संस्थित मामलों के अभियोजन तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[सं. 225/37/2002-डी.एस.पी.ई . (vi ) ] भाष्कर खुल्बे, निदेशक New Delhi , the 25th June , 2003 S.O. 1820. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 8 ) of Section 24 , of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 ( Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dipankar Dey, Advogate as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI ) in the State of West Bengal at Darjeeling as entrusted to them by the Director , Central Bureau of Investigation, in the trial Courts and appeals/ revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate Courts established by law.
[No. 225/37 /2002-DSPE (vi ) ] BHASKAR KHULBE , Director नई दिल्ली, 26 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1821.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को विचारण न्यायालयों में निदेशक, केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के. अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा असम राज्य में संस्थित मामलों के अभियोजन तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों /पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्तकरती है: -
सर्वश्री
1. आर. के. मजुमदार
2. दिलीप कुमार दास
3. शैलेंद्र नाथ चौधरी
4. बासदेव प्रसाद
5. संजीव के. लाहकर
6. श्रीमती मनोरमा कुमारी
[सं. 225 /36/2002-डी.एस.पी.ई. ] भाष्कर खुल्बे, निदेशक New Delhi , the 26th June , 2003 S.O. 1821. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -section ( 8) of Section 24 , of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI ) in the State of Assam as entrusted to them by the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, in the trial Courts and appeals/ revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate Courts established by law.
S/Shri
1. R. K. Mazumdar
2. Dilip Kumar Das
3. Shailender Nath Choudhury
4. Basdeo Prasad
5. Sanjeev K. Lahkar
6. Smt . Monorma Kumari
[No. 225/36/2002 -DSPE ] BHASKAR KHULBE, Director 4698
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] नईदिल्ली, 26 जून , 2003
वित्त मंत्रालय
( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग )
(बैंकिंग प्रभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल, 2003
का.आ. 1822.- केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को विचारण न्यायालयों में निदेशक, केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के.अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा उड़ीसा राज्य में संस्थित मामलों के अभियोजन तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/ पुनरीक्षण अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है:-
सर्वश्री
1. संतोष के. मुंड
का.आ. 1823.- भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक अधिनियम, 1989 ( 1989 का 39 ) की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा टीआईआईसी के अध्यक्ष श्री पी.वी. राजारमन को. उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य वित्त निगम, लखनऊ के पूर्व प्रबंध निदेशक श्रीमती रीता मेनन के स्थान पर 21 अप्रैल, 2003 से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक के बोर्ड में अंशकालिक गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
2. अखिलेंद्र कुमार महापात्र
[एफ. सं . 24 (5 )/2002- आई एफ-1 ] 3. बी.पी. रे
ए. के. राय , निदेशक 4. गणेश्वर रथ
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
5. उदयनाथ साहू
(Department of Economic Affairs) 6. उल्लास चंद्र मोहंती
(Banking Division )
New Delhi , the 21st April , 2003 7. सुभाष चंद्र दास
8. श्रीमती मधुमती अग्रवाल
[सं. 225/38/2002 -डी.एस.पी.ई. ]
भास्कर खुल्बे, निदेशक
New Delhi , the 26th June, 2003
S.O. 1823. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (e) of Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the Small Industries Development Bank of India Act , 1989 ( 39 of 1989) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri P. V. Rajaraman , Chairman , TIIC vice Smt . Reeta Menon, Ex- MD, Uttar Pradesh State Financial Corporation , Lucknow as part time non- official Director on the Board of Small Industries Development Bank of India for a period of three yearswith effect from 21st April , 2003.
[F. No. 24( 5 )/2002-IF.1 ] A. K. RAI , Director
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2003
A S.O. 1822. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 ( Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of cases institutedby the Delhi Special Police Establishment ( CBI ) in the State of Orissa as entrusted to them by the Director , Central Bureau of Investigation , in the trial Courts and appeals/ revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional of appellate Courts established by law.
S/Shri
1. Santosh K. Mund
2. Akhlendra Kumar Mohapatra
3. B.P. Ray
4. Ganeshwar Rath
5. Udaynath Sahoo
6. Ullash Chandra Mohanty
7. Subhash Chandra Das
का.आ. 1824.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड 9 के उपखंड ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( च ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा अखिल भारतीय यूनियम बैंक अधिकारी संघ के महासचिव श्री पी.के. सरकार को अतिरिक्त तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए, पूर्व प्रभाव के साथ 10-11-2001 से 9-11-2004 तक, जब उनका कार्यकाल छः वर्ष को पूरा हो जाएगा , अथवा उनके यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया का अधिकारी नहीं रहने पर, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो, यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के निदेशक मंडल में अधिकारी कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है । यह नामांकन बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र अधिकारी संघ द्वारा मुम्बई उच्च न्यायालय में दायर वर्ष 2001 की रिट याचिका संख्या 5394 के निर्णय के अधीन होगा ।
8. Smt . Madhumati Agarwal
[No. 225/38/2002 -DSPE ] BHASKAR KHULBE , Director
[फा. सं. 9/21 /2001- बीओ -1 ] रमेश चन्द्र , अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5,, 2003/ आषाढ़ 14, 1925
4699 New Delhi , the 13th June, 2003
(राजस्वविभाग )
आदेश
नई दिल्ली, 16 जून , 2003
स्टाम्प
का.आ. 1826.- भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम, 1899 ( 1899 का 2 ) की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा आन्ध्र प्रदेश पॉवर फाइनेंस कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, हैदराबाद को मात्र तीन करोड़ चौहत्तर लाख इक्यासी हजार दो सौ पचास रुपए का समेकित स्टाम्प शुल्क अदा करने की अनुमति प्रदान करती है , जो उक्त कॉरपोरेशन द्वारा जारी किए जाने वाले मात्र चार सौ निन्यानवे करोड़ पचहत्तर लाख रुपएके समग्र मूल्य के ऋणपत्रों के स्वरूप वाले असुरक्षित अपरिवर्तनीय विमोच्य पॉवर बंधपत्रों ( श्रृंखला-1/ 2003 तथा श्रृंखला II/ 2003 ) पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है ।
S.O. 1824. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( f) of Sub -section 3 of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970 read with sub -clauses ( 1 ) and (2) of clause ( 9 ) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme , 1970 , the Central Government, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India hereby re- nominates Shri P.K. Sarkar , General Secretary, All India Union Bank Officers ' Federation as Officer Employee Director on the Board of Directors of Union Bank of India for a further period of three years , commencing retrospectively from 10-11-2001 to 9-11-2004 when he will complete the total tenure of six years or until he ceases to be an officer of Union Bank of India , whichever is earlier . The nomination will be subject to the decision of the Mumbai High Court in writ petition No. 5394 of 2001 filed byBank of Maharashtra Officers Association.
[सं. 28/2003- स्टाम्प/फा. सं. 33/29/2003 - बि.क. ] [F. No. 9/21/2001-В.О. -
आर. जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव RAMESH CHAND , Under Secy.
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
ORDER
New Delhi , the 16th June , 2003
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून , 2003
STAMPS
का.आ. 1825.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा वित्त मंत्रालय, राजस्व विभाग, नई दिल्ली में संयुक्तसचिव श्री राकेश सिंह को तत्काल प्रभाव से एवं अगले आदेश होने तक अथवा वित्त मंत्रालय में उनके अधिकारी नहीं रहने पर, जो भी पहले हो, आंध्रा बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में श्री जी. एस. दत्त के स्थान पर निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।
[फा. सं. 9/3/2002-बीओ -1 ]
S.O. 1826.- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899), the Central Government hereby permits Andhra Pradesh Power Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad to pay Consolidated stamp duty of rupees three crore seventy four lakh eighty one thousand two hundred fifty only on account of the stamp duty on Unsecured Non - Convertible Redeemable Power Bonds (Series I/2003 and Series II/2003 ) in the nature ofdebentures aggregating to rupees four hundred ninety nine črore' seventy five lakh only, to be issued by the said Corporation.
रमेश चन्द्र, अवर सचिव
[No. 28/2003 - STAMP/F. No. 33 /29/2003 - ST] R. G. CHHABRA, Under Secy.
आदेश
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2003
नई दिल्ली, 16 जून, 2003
स्टाम्प
S.O. 1825. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause ( b) of Sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act , 1980 read with sub-clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3 of the Nationalized Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme , 1980, the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri Rakesh Singh , Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue , New Delhi as a director onthe Board of Directors of Andhra Bank with immediate effect and until further orders or until he ceases to be an officer of Ministry of Finance , whichever is earlier vice Shri G. S. Dutt.
का.आ. 1827.- भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम , 1899 (1899 का 2 ) की धारा 9 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा आई. एफ. सी. आई. लिमिटेड, नई दिल्ली को मात्र बीस लाख रुपये का समेकित स्टाम्प शुल्क अदा करने की अनुमति प्रदान करती है, जो उक्त कम्पनी द्वारा जारी किए जाने वाले मात्र बीस करोड़ रुपये के समग्र मूल्य के 0020051 विशिष्ट संख्या वाले प्रोमिसरी नोटों के स्वरूप वाले जमा प्रमाणपत्र पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है ।
[F. No. 9/ 3/2002 -B.O . -I]
[सं. 27/2003 - स्टाम्प/फा. सं . 33/ 30/ 2003-बि.क. ] RAMESH CHAND , Under Secy.
आर. जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव 4700
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] ORDER
New Delhi , the 27th June, 2003
New Delhi , the 16th June , 2003 STAMPS
S.O. 1829. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949 ) the Central Government on recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India declares that the provisions of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 11 ofthe said Act shall not apply to Bhawanipatna Central Co- operative Bank Ltd. , Kalahandi Ori . a from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette till 31 March, 2004 .
S.O. 1827. In exercise of the powers conferredby clause (b ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899 ), the Central Government hereby permits IFCI Limited, New Delhi to pay Consolidated stamp duty of rupees twenty takh only on account of the stamp duty on Cetificate of Deposit in the nature of Promissory Notes bearing distinctive number 0020051 aggregatingto rupees twenty crore only, to be issued by the said Company.
[F. No. 1(44) /98- AC] MANGAL MARNDI , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 जून, 2003
[No. 27/2003 - STAMP/F. No. 33 / 30/ 2003 - ST] R.G. CHHABRA , Under Secy. आर्थिक कार्य विभाग (बैंकिग प्रभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 27 जून, 2003
का.आ. 1830.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 56 के साथ पठित धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 31 मार्च, 2004 तक दि युनाइटेट पुरी नीमापाड़ा सेंट्रल को- आपरेटिव बैंक लि. , पुरी , उड़ीसा पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।
का.आ. 1828.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 (1949 का 10 ) की धारा 56 के साथ पठित धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 31 मार्च , 2004 तक नयागढ़ सेंट्रल को- आपरेटिव बैंक लि. , नयागढ़, उड़ीसा पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।
[फा. सं. 1 ( 7 ) /2000-ए.सी. ] मंगल मरांड़ी, अवर सचिव [फा. सं. 1 ( 39 )/98-ए.सी. ] मंगल मरांडी, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th June , 2003
(Department of Economic Affairs)
(Banking Division ) New Delhi , the 27th June , 2003
S.O. 1830. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) the Central Government on recommendation of the reserve Bank of India declares that the provisions of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 11 of the said Act shall not apply to the United Puri Nimapara Central Co-operative bank Ltd. Puri Orissa from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette till 31 March, 2004 .
[F. No. 1(7)/2000 -AC]
MANGAL MARNDI , Under Secy.
S.O. 1828.- In exercise of the powers conferredby Section 53 read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949 ) the Central Government on recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India declares that the provisions of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 11 of the said Act shall not apply to Nayagarh District Central Co- operative Bank Ltd. Nayagarh , Orissa from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette till 31 March 2004 .
[F. No. 1 (39 )/98 -AC] MANGAL MARNDI , Under Secy.
संचार और सूचना प्रोद्यौगिकी मंत्रालय (दूरसंचार विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 27 जून , 2003
( राजभाषा अनुभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 27 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1829.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 56 के साथ पठित धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 31 मार्च, 2004 तक भवानीपटना सेंट्रल को - आपरेटिव बैंक लि. , कालाहांडी, उड़ीसा पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।
का.आ. 1831.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 1976 ( यथा संशोधित 1987 ) के नियम 10(4 ) के अनुसरण में संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय, दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों को हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त है, भारत के राजपत्र में अधिसूचित किया गया है । चूंकि अब भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के गठन के पश्चात् उनके नाम एवं स्तर में [फा. सं. 1 (44 )/98-ए.सी. ] मंगल मरांडी, अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4701
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5,, 2003/ आषाढ़ 14, 1925
परिवर्तन आया है अतः उन्हें अब निम्नवत पढ़ा जाए:
अब
पहलेसे अधिसूचित
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार
महाराष्ट्र दूरसंचार परिमंडल, मुम्बई
मुख्य अधीक्षक, केन्द्रीय तार घर
मुम्बई-400001
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार, भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, महाराष्ट्र दूरसंचार परिमंडल , मुम्बई
फाइल सं. ई. 11027/ 1/85- रा.भा.
मुम्बई -400001
महाप्रबंधक, केन्द्रीय तार घर, मुम्बई-400001
[सं. ई-11016/1/2002- रा. भा. ] कैलाश दत्ता, उप निदेशक ( राजभाषा) MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Department of Telecommunications) New Delhi , the 27th June , 2003
S.O. 1831. In pursuance of rule 10(4) ofthe Official Language (Use for official purpose of the Union ) , rules , 1976 ( as amended, 1987) the Central Government has notified the following office under the administrative control of Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications where of more than 80 % staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi . After the formation of BSNL , the name and status of this office have since been changed and now the same may be read as under :-
Now notified as Already notified as
Chief General Manager ChiefGeneral Manager Telecom, Maharashtra Circle, Bombay
Chief Superintendent
CTO, Bombay No. E. 11027/ 1 /85 -O.L . Dt. 31-12-85
Telecom, BSNL, Maharashtra Circle, Bombay General Manager , Central Telegraph Office Bombay-400001
[No. E. 11016/1/2002 (O.L . ) ] KAILASH DUTTA, Dy. Director ( O.L) पोत परिवहन मंत्रालय (नौवहन पक्ष) नई दिल्ली, 20 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1832. दीपघर केन्द्रीय सलाहकार समिति (प्रकियात्मक) नियमावली 1976 के नियम 3 , 4 और 11 के साथ पठित दीपधर अधिनियम, 1927 ( 1927 का 17 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतदद्वारा भारत सरकार, पोत परिवहन मंत्रालय , ( नौवहन पक्ष ) की अधिसूचना सं . एल एच -11016/2/2002- एसएल दिनांक12 मई, 2003 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है : -
12मई, 2003 की उक्त अधिसूचना में क्रम सं. १ को निम्नानुसार बदला जाए:-
-आई. पी. ए. के प्रतिनिधि ( १ ) कैप्टन सुभाष कुमार, डिप्टी कंजरवेटर,
जवाहरलाल नेहरु पोर्ट ट्रस्ट, मुम्बई ।
[फा. सं. एलएच-11016/ 2/ 2002 - एसएल ] मुंशी राम, अवर सचिव 1734G12003-2
MINISTRY OF SHIPPING (Shippingwing)
New Delhi , the 20th June , 2003 *
S.O. 1832. In pursuance of Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Lighthouse Act, 1927 (No. 17 of 1927 ) read with Rule 4 of the Central Advisory Committée for Lighthouses ( Procedural ) rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the Government of India , Ministry of Shipping (Shipping Wings) Notification No. LH - 11016/2/2000 - SL dated 12th May, 2003.
In the said notification dated 12th May, 2003 the existing entry at S. No. 9 , shall be changed, namely:-
(9) Capt, Subhas Kumar, Representative of Indian ports Association .
Dy.Conservator, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust Mumbai .
[F. No. LH- 11016/2/2002 -SL . ] MUNSHI RAM, Under Secy.
मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय
(माध्यमिक और उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 23 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1833.- इस मंत्रालय की 31 मार्च , 2003 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा आरोविले प्रतिष्ठान बोर्ड के अध्यक्ष के रूप में डा. किरीट जोशी के कार्यकाल की अवधि को 11-06-2003 से तीन महीने के लिए अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक, इनमें जो भी पहले हो, बढ़ाती है ।
[सं. एफ. 27-50/2002 - यू.यू. ] सी. बालाकृष्णन, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (Department of Secondary and Higher Education) New Delhi , the 23rd June, 2003
S.O. 1833. In continuation of notification of the Ministry of even number dated 31st March, 2003 the Central Govt . hereby grant extension for three months to Dr.Kireet Joshi as the Chairman of the Board of Auroville Foundation w.e.f. 11-6-2003 or till further orders . whichever isearlier.
[No. F. 27-50/2002- UU. ] C. BALAKRISHNAN , Jt. Secy.
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
4702
पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 30 जून , 2003
का. आ. 1834.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में नीचे अनुसूची के स्तम्भ ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित व्यक्ति को अनुसूची के स्तम्भ ( 2 ) में तत्स्थानी प्रविष्टि में उल्लिखित क्षेत्रों के संबंध में , उक्त अधिनियम के उपबंधों के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
अनुसूची
अधिकारिता का क्षेत्र
और पता
प्राधिकारी का नाम
(2)
(1)
राजस्थान राज्य
श्री राजीव कुमार पाण्डेय
तहसीलदार ,
सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, 6 और 33 मुक्तानंद नगर, ( निकट गोपालपुरा बाईपास ) जयपुर-302 018
(राजस्थान)
[फा. सं. आर-25011/8/2003- ओ.आर-1 ]
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas
NewDelhi , 30th June , 2003
S. O. 1834. In pursuance of clause ( a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby authorises the person mentioned in column ( 1) of the Schedule below to perform the functions of the competent authority under the provisions of the said Act , within the areas mentioned in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the Schedule .
4703 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
Schedule
Area ofJurisdiction Name and Address of the Authority
(2)
(1)
State of Rajasthan Shri Rajiv Kumar Pandey Tehsildar
Competent Authority
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
6& 33 , Muktanand Nagar ( Near Gopalpura By - pass )
Jaipur- 302 018 (Rajasthan)
[No. R-25011/8/2003-O.R. -I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 1 जुलाई, 2003
का. आ. 1835.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का. आ. 1484 तारीख 30 अप्रैल 2002, का आ. 2825 तारीख 3 सितम्बर 2002 और का. आ. 4010 तारीख 26 दिसम्बर 2002 द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में जामनगर से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में भोपाल तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना के संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और, उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 23 सितम्बर 2002 और 24 जनवरी 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;
और, पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नही हुए हैं ;
और, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;
i 4704
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)] अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना के संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन और इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
राज्यः मध्य प्रदेश
जिलाः देवास
क्षेत्रफल
तहसीलः देवास गाँव का नाम
आरे
सर्वे नंबर
सि-आरे
हेक्टर
5
3
2
4
1
36
60 218/1
0
1. भंड्या पिपल्या प.ह.नं. 30
0
60
36
योग
00
250
0
10 2. भाटखेड़ी प.ह.नं. 38
00
0
10 योग
30
0
20
00
3. गोदल्या प.ह.नं. 31
00
20
0
योग
[फा. सं. एल.- 14014/28/2001-जी.पी . ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
New Delhi , 1st July, 2003
S. O. 1835. Whereas by notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. 1484, dated the 30th April, 2002, S.O. 2825 , dated the 3rd September ,2002 and S.O. 4010 , dated 26th December , 2002, issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ) (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to these notifications , for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of regassified liquefied natural gas through the Jamnagar -Bhopal Pipeline Project from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State ofMadhya Pradesh by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;
And whereas, the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 23rd September, 2002 and 24th January, 2003;
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii)]
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
4705 And whereas , no objection has been received from the public to the laying of the pipelines ;
And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;
And whereas the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying pipelines , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification, is hereby acquired, for laying the pipelines ;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on this date of publication of the declaration, in Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
District : Dewas
Tehsil : Dewas
State : Madhya Pradesh Name of the Village
AREA Are
Hectare
C-Are SurveyNo
2
3
4
1
5
0
218/1
36
60 1. BHANDIYA PIPLIYA P.C.NO - 30
0
36
60
TOTAL
0
250
00
10 2. BHATKHEDI P.C.NO - 38
TOTAL
0
00
10
0
30
00
20 3. GODLIYA P.C.NO- 31
TOTAL
0
00
20
[No. L- 14014/28/2001 -G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH, Director 4706
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 1 जुलाई , 2003
का. आ. 1836.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एण्ड इन्फास्ट्रकचर कंपनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कंपनी मेसर्स रिलायंस इण्डस्ट्रीज के गोवा के उत्तरी / दक्षिणी अपतट ऑफसोर के खोज व्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश की संरचनाओं से आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य में नल्गोंडा जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मैसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एण्ड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइने विछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइने बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइने विछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधसूचना से उपाबध्द अनुसूची में वर्णित हैं, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
A अतः, अव , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती ह;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितवध्द है, उस तारीख से जिससे उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइने बिंछाए जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के लिए श्री पी. बुच्चारेडडी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जी.टी.आई. सी.एल पाइप लाइन परियोजना , 409, ' सी' एवरेस्ट व्लाक, आदित्या इन्क्लेव, अमीरपेट, हैदराबाद, आन्ध्र प्रदेश पिन 500038 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
मंडल : चिव्वेमला
जिल्हा: नल्गोंडा
राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सं . । सब डिविजन सं .
एरिया
हेक्टर
एर
सिएर
5 1
2
3
4
60
15
106
00
1) बीबगूडेम्
20
11
14
00
56
00
00 41
70 71
00
47
40
00
58
72
00
06
70 सर्वे से 41 और 14 के बीच में ( क्रासिंग
ल्यान्ड) भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
4707
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5 , 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2
301
2) चिव्वेमला
302
318
319
320
328
332
333
334
334 का भाग (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
442
443
444
445
446
447
449
450
454
455
456
456का पार्ट ( क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
463
470
472
555
557
565
566
569
570
572
573
590
591
592
596
597 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
सर्वे से 456 और 463 के बीच में (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
सर्वे से 472 और 597 के बीच में (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
4
3
5 00
01
20
42
00
85
67
00
40
85 00
51
43
05 00
00
89
65 00
70
30 00
52
70 00
18
70
35 00
04
00
01
80
03
70 00
35
65 00
28
00
30
14
15 00
29
60 00
36
70 00
00
23
75
23
90 00
63
00
55
10 00
50
00 00
04
00
80
45 00
60
65 00
38
65 00
27
50 00
04
30
85 00
01
00
01
20 00
30
35
85
35 00
30
00
55 00
40
94
00
46
05 00
27
45 00
61
10 00
52
50-
74
50 00
00
08
85 00
07
50 4708
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14, 1925
2 1
100
3) कुडकुडा
101
106
108
137
139
139 का भाग (क्रासिंग ल्यान्डं)
151
151 का भाग
214
225
227
228
241
243
244
247
247 का भाग (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
248
249
266
267
279
287
288
289
290
56
57
58
59
61
62
63
66
81
82
83
83 का भाग ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
89
90
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
4
5 3
15
00
00
46
00
10
35
44
00
10
21
00
03
70 00
06
55 01
08
85 00
00
42
65
45 00
44
00
74
00
00
66
75
05 00
32
00
39
40
46
90 00
40
28
00
70 00
01
00
22
00
40
02
00
07
20 00
50
07
00
35 00
70
00
60
09
55
90 00
45
22
00
00
17
00
29
70 00
00
16
00
95 00
15
05
22
00
20
16
00
75
01
00
95
05
00
70
24
00
04
10 00
10 00
13
21
35 00
20
13
00
85
14
01
50
04
00
90
42
00
30 00
51 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4709
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़14, 1925
1
2
103 4) तिम्मापुरम्
106
107
133
133 का भाग (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड )
134
134 का भाग (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
168
169
173
176
178
246
247
249
262
276
277
278
279
280
281
283
56
57
58
93
94
सर्वे सं 249 और 247 का वीच में (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
सर्वे से 56 और 67 का वीच में (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 178 और 262 का वीच में (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड) 1734GI2003-3
4
5 3
00
77
45 00
02
20 00
27
15 00
70
59
04
00
50 00
37
70
02
00
25 00
28
00 00
25
90 00
20
29
00
57
65 00
36
25 00
50
90 00
27
55 00
63
75
22
20 00
00
30
53
00
10
85 00
07
95 00
06
40 00
36
80 00
00
15 00
11
35 0.0
28
25 00
42
20 00
57
00 00
37
20 00
39
80 00
06
10 00
07
70 00
08
05 4710
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14 , 1925
1
2
641
5) वट्टिखम्ममपाहाड
643
644
648
650
652
653
654
गाँव सीमां और 643 का वीच में ( क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
मंडल : केनेपाल्लि
जिल्हा नल्गींडा
115
1) गुडिवाडझा
116
148
149
150
154
155
156
163
164
168
169
269
270
272
81
82
83
83
85
92
93
95
96
98
सर्वे में 64 और 168 का वीच में (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
134
2) काासनगूडझा
156
160
161
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3
4
5
39
90 00
00
22
20 00
95
05 00
56
55 00
00
45 00
43
90 00
57
75
28
00
95 00
10
12
राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
00
14
40 00
99
20 00
59
20 00
42
05 00
09
55
60 00
45
00
14
95 00
14
10 01
14
35
47
25 00
19
00
00 00
61
75 00
16
05 00
82
05 00
10
11
21
00
90 00
07
55 00
37
05 00
04
40 00
09
54
16
00
50 00
32
90 00
19
50 00
47
95 00
75
97
00
08
75 00
03
20 00
54
85
46
00
30 00
43
85 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4711
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2
162
2) काासनगूडाा ( निरंतर )
168
169
175
176
178
178 का भाग ( क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
180
187
188
190
233
गॉव सीमा और 156 का बीच में (गवर्नमेन्ट
ल्यान्ड)
मंडल मोते
जिल्हा : नल्गोंडा
149
1) नामावरम्
150
151
152
155(गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
219
220
221
222
223
227
228
233
234
235
236
237
240
545
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
3
4
5
68
80 00
00
34
55 00
40
30
12
95 00
40 00
51
00
46
55
50
10
00
09
70 01
80
55 00
00
69
40
83
00
15 00
02
25
55
30 00
आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
राज्य
15 00
75
40 00
01
00
62
30
58
10 00
00
03
45
10 00
00
28
25 00
29
00
35 00
80
01
13
00 00
21
75 00
05
60 00
20
04
00
00
07
00
00 00
00
12
95 00
16
00
75
00
00
55
31
65 00
32
00
55 00
23
25
22
05 00
10 00
00
39
60 00
46
75 00
10
33
00
00
60
75 4712
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2 1) नामावरम् ( निरंतर )
568 ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
569
570
570 का भाग (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
571
721
722
724
726
729
731
738
739
744
750
752
768
770
771
773
779
780
870
जिल्हा नल्गोंडा मंडल मुनगाला
171
1) कलकोवा
173
174
175
177 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
178 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
179
181
182/1 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
182/2
183/4
184
190
191/3
193 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
194 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
195
247/1
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
4
3
5 00
00
60 00
75
45 00
87
55
03
00
90 00
35
95 00
27
25 00
44
45 00
18
35 00
69
85 01
06
95
02
00
20
50
00
65 00
26
65 00
43
10 00
68
00
39
00
85 00
05
20 00
84
90 00
02
20 00
65
45
67
50 00
00
58
10 00
00
65 राज्य : आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
00
58
90 00
10
00
34
00
20 00
02
00 00
03
85 00
00
15
46
00
75 00
09
00 00
06
35 00
43
90 00
14
65 00
20
39
00
47
75 00
41
65
00 00
05
00
00
80
10 00
00
00
06
55 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]
4713
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2
248/2
1 ) कलकोवा ( निरंतर )
251/1
251/2
251/6
251/7
252/3
252/4
252/5
252/6
253/1
253/2
253/3
254/2
255/1
256/2
260/1
261/1
261/2
261/2
261/3
261/4
261/5
269/1
269/2
269/3
12/1
2) मुनगाला
12/2
121/1
122/1
122/2
125 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
126/2
127/1
127/3
127/4
128
16/1
17/2
17/3
20/1
20/2(गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
21(गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड) 3
4
5 00
96
30 00
00
20
00
00
95 00
03
15 00
00
25 00
06
05 00
24
05 00
01
60 00
01
80 00
01
80
13
00
50 00
20
30 00
01
00 00
33
65 00
30
85
32
00
60 00
07
70 00
14
85 00
04
45 00
18
85 00
43
75 00
03
05 00
42
60 00
04
75 00
03
70 00
40
15
00
01
25 00
39
60 00
02
75 00
72
45 00
03
35 00
24
90 00
09
30 00
10
50
17
00
30 00
08
24 01
50
10
00
04
00 00
68
70 00
46
45
02
00
50
06
00
50 4714
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2
23/1
2) मुनगाला ( निरंतर )
23/2
23/3
24/2
24/3
25/1
25/2
26/3
68
74
75 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
77/1
77/2
77/3
77/4
79(गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
81/1
81/2
1014/1
3) रेपाला
1014/2
1015/2
1017/2
1017/3
1018
1022/4
1023/3
1027/2
1028
1029
1030
1031/1
1031/2
1050/1
1050/2
1051 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
1052/1 ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
1052/2
1052/5
1053/1
1070/1
1071/1
660/1 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
5
4
3
00
10
40
03
00 00
00
23
95 00
00
10
24
20 00
00
11
90
35 00
10
16
00
75
01
95 00
00
09
00
00
50
10
27
00
85
26
45 00
24
70 00
24
80 00
90
04
00
10
02
00
60 00
45
37
00
40
15 00
18
60 00
37
00
35
59
00
35 00
62
00
55 00
02
80
02
00
10
05
24
00
18
55 00
20 00
19
80 00
15
06
00
45
25 00
23
00
73
15
10 00
04
05
80 00
10 00
01
65
02
00
1.4
55 00
75 00
19
40 00
00
00
38
25
20 00
06 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़-14, 1925
1
2
661
३) रेपाला ( निरंतर )
663/2
663/3
663/5
663/6
663/7
663/8
667
668
669/2
669/3 ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
670(गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
671/1 ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
708 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
709/1
709/2 ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
710/4
717/1
717/2
717/3 ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
717/4
718/1
720
721
723
966/1 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
966/6
967
972/2
972/3
973/2
976/1 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
976/3
977/3
984/1
984/4
984/5
984/6
985/1
989/1
989/2 ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
989/3
4715 3
4
5 00
31
45 00
00
10 00
03
05 00
08
55 00
21
40 00
07
05 00
00
10 00
69
85 00
61
30 00
65
40 00
03
25 00
04
45 00
01
75 00
04
35 00
00
10 00
23
45 00
37
90 00
14
35 00
00
40 00
03
45 00
23
40 00
53
20 00
27
60 00
33
65 00
07
50 00
02
70 00
22
30 00
00
60 00
47
50 00
04
50 00
80
35 00
02
75 00
29
70 00
16
95 00
08
15 00
30
35 00
02
05 00
56
05 00
14
40 00
05
45 00
11
35 00
90
05 4716
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
1
2 3) रेपाला ( निरंतर )
990 ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
जिल्हा : नल्गोंडा मंडल : सूर्यापेट
299
1) पिल्ललमद्रि
307
327
327 का भाग ( क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
328
332
334
338
339
349
356
357
358
362
363
363 का भाग ( क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
374
375
380
387
388
389
390
1
2) पिन्नय्यापालेम्
14
151
157
158
161
162
168
169
3
333
334
335
336
340
341
4
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
4
3
5 00
06
15 राज्य : आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
00
11
25 00
00
10
30 00
26
00
03
50 01
30
48
24
50 00
20 00
28
00
18
25 00
00
10 00
81
65 00
39
55
66
00
25 00
20
23
01
26
75 00
26
20 00
04
25
26
65 00
00
70
65 00
01
00 00
10
13
00
10
44
53
00
25
21
00
95 00
34
55
28
45 00
13
00
95 00
20
40
55 00
18
05
00
45 00
39
30 00
66
60 00
20
40 00
91
70 00
16
00 00
95
37
60 00
44
26
00
40
20 00
11
65 00
92
00
12
45 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4717
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
2 1
2) पिन्नय्यापालेम् ( निरंतर )
सर्वे सं 1 और 341 का बीच में (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड) सर्वे सं 151 और 4 का बीच में ( गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
50
3) रामन्नागूडेम्
51
52
55
56
62
63
68
69
70
10
4) वेंकटरामापुरम्
11
11 का बाग (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
16
45
46
47
:
48
57
58
59
7 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
78
78 का बीच में ( क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
79
9
सर्वे सं 59 और78 का बीच में (क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
357
5) यंड्लापल्लि
359
573(गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
576
577
589
593
597
598
599
604
1734G120034
5 3
4
20
05
00
15 00
05
15
34
00
70
63
00
15
02
00
20
61
00
50
38
00
31
90 00
37
95 00
50
19
00
50 00
63
00
65 00
95 00
00
35 00
44
25
08
00
05 00
36
70
77
00
10
00
00
00
00 00
65
50 00
95
15
00
10
62
00
75
60
00
35
46
01
00
32
00
19
95 00
27
65 00
45
61
00
90
05
00
:
10
62
00
60
72
00
08
50 00
56
00 00
80
23
00.
85
35 00
00
55
00
00
85 00
13
75 00
35
34
00
70
09
00 4718
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2
3
4
5 605
00
20
00 5) यंड्लापल्लि ( निरंतर )
614
00
06
40
00
55
सर्वे सं 604 और गॉव सीमा का बीच में
30
(
(क्रासिंग ल्यान्ड)
[ फा. सं. एल.-14014/25/2003- जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
New Delhi , 1st July, 2003
S. O. 1836. Whereas it appearsto the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the Natural Gas from the exploration blocks in the Northern/ Southern Offshore ofGoa and structures in Andhra Pradesh of M /s Reliance Industries Limited, the promoter Company of M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limitedto the various consumers of Nalgonda District in the State of Andhra Pradesh , pipeline should be laid by Mis Gas Transportation and infrastructure Company Limited;
Andwhereas it appears to the Central Governrnent that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962(50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writingto the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri . P. Butcha Reddy, Competent Authority,GTICL Pipeline Project , 409 , ' c' Everest Block , Aditya Enclave , Ameerpet , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh Pin - 500038.
Schedule
Mandal: Chivemla
State: Andhra Pradesh
District: Nalgonda
Village
Survey No./Sub-Division No.
Area of ROU
Hectare
Are
C-Are 1
2
3
4
5 1) Bibigudam
106
00
15
60 14
00
11
20 41
00
56
00 71
00
47
70 72
00
58
40
00
06
70 In between Sy.No. 41 & 14 (Crossing Land ) [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4719
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
2 1
2) Chivemla
301
302
318
319
320
328
332
333
334
334Part
4
5 3
00
01
20
85
42
00
00
67
40
85 00
51
05 00
43
00
65
89
00
30
70
00
70
52
70 00
18
00
04
35
(Crossing Land )
442
443
444
445
446
447
449
450
454
455
456
456 Part
01
80 00
00
03
70 00
35
65 00
30
28
00
14
15
60 00
29
00
36
70
23
75 00
00
23
90
63
00
55
10 00
50
00 00
04
(Crossing Land )
463
470
472
555
557
565
566
569
570
572
573
590
591
592
596
597 (Government Land )
Inbetween Sy . No.456 & 463 (Crossing Land ) Inbetween Sy . No.472 & 597 (Crossing Land)
80
45 00
65 00
60
65 00
38
27
00
50
04
30 00
00
01
85
20 00
01
30
35 00
00
85
35
55 00
30
40
94
00
05
46
00
45
27
00
61
10 00
50
52
00
50
74
00
85 00
08
50
07
00 4720
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
2 3) Kudkuda
100
101
106
108
137
139
139Part (Crossing Land )
151
151Part
214
225
227
228
241
243
244
247
247 Part (Crossing Land)
248
249
266
267
279
287
288
289
290
56
57
58
59
61
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]
4
3
5
00
00
15 00
46
10 00
44
35 00
21
10 00
03
70 01
06
55 00
08
85 00
42
65 00
45
44
00
74
00 00
66
75 00
32
05 00
39
40 00
46
90 00
28
40 00
01
70 00
22
00 00
02
40 00
07
20 00
07
50 00
70
35 00
09
60 00
55
90 00
22
45 00
17
00 00
29
70 00
16
00 00
15
95 00
22
05 00
16
20
01
00
75 00
05
95 [भागे II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4721
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2 3) Kudkuda (Contd.... )
62
63
66
81
82
83
83Part
4
5 3
00
24
70 00
04
10
10 00
13
21
35 00
20 00
13
01
14
85 00
50
04
(Government Land)
89
90
4) Timmapuram
103
106
107
133
133Part (Crossing Land)
134
134Part (Crossing Land)
168
169
173
176
178
246
247
249
262
276
277
278
279
280
281
283
56
57
58
93
94
Inbetween Sy. No. 249 & 247 (Government Land)
In between Sy. No. 56 & 107 (Government Land )
In between Sy . No.178 & 262 (Crossing Land)
42
00
90
30 00
51
00
77
45 00
02
20
27
00
15
70 00
59
00
04
50 00
70
37
00
25
02
00
28
00
25
00
90 00
29
20
65 00
57
00
36
25 00
50
90 00
27
55 00
63
75
22
00
20 00
53
30 00
85
10
07
00
95 00
06
40 00
36
80 00
00
15 00
11
35 00
28
25 00
42
20 00
57
00 00
37
20
39
80 00
00
06
10 00
07
70
05 00
08 4722
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
1
2 5) Vattikhammampahad
641
643
644
648
650
652
653
654
Inbetween Village Boundary & 643 (CrossingLand) Mandal: Kethepalli
District:
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
4
5 3
39
00
90
22
00
20
95
05 00
00
56
55 00
00
45 00
90
43
00
57
75 00
95
28
12
10 00
Andhra Pradesh State :
Nalgonda
1)Gudivada
115
116
148
149
150
154
155
156
163
164
168
169
269
270
272
81
82
83
84
85
92
93
95
96
98
In between Sy . No. 164 & 168 (Crossing Land )
134
2) Kasangooda
156
160
161
162
00
14
40 00
99
20
20
59
00
00
42
05
55 00
09
00
60
45
00
95
14
00
14
10
35 01
14
00
25
47
00 00
19
00
61
75
05
16
00
82
05 00
11
10 00
90 00
21
07
55 00
37
00
05
40 00
04
00
54
09
00
16
50
32
90 00
50 00
19
00
47
95
75 00
97
00
08
75
03
20 00
54
85 00
30 00
46
85
43
00
80 00
68 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/ अषाढ़ 14, 1925
2 1
2) Kasangooda (Contd ....)
168
169
175
176
178
178Part (Crossing Land )
180
187
188
190
233
In between Vill.Bound & 156 (Government Land ) Mandal : Mothey
District:
4723 3
4
5 00
34
55 00
40
30
12
00
95 00
40
51
46
55 00
00
10
50 01
70
09
00
80
55 00
69
40 00
83
15
02
00
25 00
55
30 State: Andhra Pradesh
Nalgonda
1) Namavaram
149
150
151
152
155 (Government Land )
219
220
221
222
223
227
228
233
234
235
236
237
240
545
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
568 (Government Land ) 00
75
15 00
01
40 00
62
30 00
58
10 00
03
45
00
10 00
00
28
25 00
29
35 00
01
80
13
00
00 00
21
75 00
60
05
04
00
20 00
07
00 00
00
00
12
00
95 00
16
75 00
00
55 00
31
.65
32
55 00
23
00
25 00
22
05
00
00
10 00
39
60 00
46
75 00
33
10 00
60
75 00
00
60 4724
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2 1) Namavaram (Contd ....)
569
570
570Part (Crossing Land )
571
721
722
724
726
729
731
738
739
744
750
752
768
770
771
773
779
780
870
Mandal : Munagala
District: Nalgonda 1) Kalakova
171
173
174
175
177 (Government Land )
178 (Governrnent Land )
179
181
182/1 (Government Land )
182/2
183/4
184
190
191/3
193 (Government Land )
194 (Governrnent Land )
195
247/1
248/2
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)) 3
4
5 00
75
45 00
87
55 00
03
90
35
00
95 00
27
25 00
44
45 00
18
35 00
69
85
06
01
95 00
02
20 00
50
65 00
65
26
00
43
10 00
68
00 00
39
85
05
00
20 00
84
90 00
02
20 00
65
45 00
67
50 00
58
10 00
00
65 State: Andhra Pradesh 00
90
58
00
00
10 00
34
20 00
02
00 00
03
85 00
00
15 00
75
46
00
09
00 00
06
35
43
00
90 00
14
65
20 00
39
00
75
47
00
41
65 00
00
05
00
00
80
00
00
10 00
06
55 00
30
96 4725
भारत का राजमत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2 1
1) Kalakova (Contd....)
251/1
251/2
251/6
251/7
252/3
252/4
252/5
252/6
253/1
253/2
253/3
254/2
255/1
256/2
260/1
260/2
261/1
261/2
261/3
261/4
261/5
269/1
269/2
269/3
2)Munagala
12/1
12/2
121/1
122/1
122/2
125 (Government Land )
126/2
127/1
127/3
127/4
128
16/1
17/2
17/3
20/1
20/2 (Government Land )
21 (Govemment Land )
23/1
1734GI2003-5
4
5 3
20
00
00
95
00
00
15
03
00
25
00
00
05 00
06
24
05 00
60
01
00
80 00
01
80
01
00
13
50 00
30
20
00
00
01
00
65
33
00
00
85
30
60
32
00
14
00
85
70
07
00
45
04
00
85
18
00
43
75 00
05
03
00
60 00
42
04
75 -00
70 00
03
40 00
15
01
25 00
60
39
00
00
02
75
72
45 00
35
03
00
90
24
00
09
30 00
50
10
00
17
30 00
24 00
08
50 01
10
00 00
04
70 00
68
46
45 00
02
50 00
06
50 00
10
40 00 4726
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2 2) Munagala(Contd.... )
23/2
23/3
24/2
24/3
25/1
25/2
26/3
68
74
75 (Govemment Land )
77/1
77/2
77/3
77/4
79 (Govemment Land )
81/1
81/2
3) Repala
1014/1
1014/2
1015/2
1017/2
1017/3
1018
1022/4
1023/3
1027/2
1028
1029
1030
1031/1
1031/2
1050/1
1050/2
1051 (Government Land )
1052/1 (Govemment Land )
1052/2
1052/5
1053/1
1070/1
1071/1
660/1 (Govemment Land )
661
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3
4
5 00
03
00 00
23
95 00
00
10 00
24
20 00
11
90
10
35 00
16
00
75 00
01
95 00
09
00
10 00
50
00
27
85 00
26
45
70 00
24
00
24
80 00
90
04
00
02
10 00
45
60 00
37
40 00
18
15
60 00
37
00
59
35
00
35 00
00
62
55 00
02
80 00
02
10 00
24
05 00
18
55
20
19
00
00
80
15
00
06
45 00
23
25
15 00
73
00
04
10 00
05
80
01
10 00 .
65 00
02
14
55 00
75 00
19
00
40 00
38
25 00
00
06
20 00
31
45 4727
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5 , 2003/ अषाढ़14, 1925
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2 1
663/2
3)Repela(Contd....)
663/3
663/5
663/6
663/7
663/8
667
668
669/2
669/3 (Government Land )
670 (Government Land )
671/1 (Government Land)
708 (Government Land )
709/1
709/2 (Government Land )
710/4
717/1
717/2
717/3 (GovernmentLand )
717/4
718/1
720
721
723
966/1 (Government Land )
966/6
967
972/2
972/3
973/2
976/1 (Government Land )
976/3
977/3
984/1
984/4
984/5
984/6
985/1:
989/1
989/2 (Government Land )
989/3
990 (Government Land)
5
4
3
10
00
00
05 00
03
55 00
08
40
21
00
05
07
00
10
00
00
85 00
69
30
61
00
40 00
65
25
03
00
45
04
00
75
01
00
35
04
00
10
00
00
45
23
00
90
37
00
35
14
00
40
00
00
45 00
03
40 00
23
20 00
53
60
27
00
65 00
33
50
07
00
02
70 00
30
22
00
60
00
00
50
47
00
50
04
00
35 00
80
75 00
02
70
29
00
95
16
00.
15 00
08
35
00
00
05
02
00
56
05 00
40 00
14
45
05
00
35
11
00
05
90
00
15
06
00 4728
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2 Mandal : Suryapeta
District: Nalgonda 1) Pillalamarry
299
307
327
327Part (Crossing Land)
328
332
334
338
339
349
356
357
358
362
363
363Part (Crossing Land )
374
375
380
387
388
389
390
2) Pinnaipalem
1
14
151
157
158
161
162
168
169
3
333
334
335
336
340
341
4
[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]
4
5 3
State: Andhra Pradesh 00
11
25 00
00
10 00
26
30 00
03
50 01
48
30 00
24
50 00
28
20 00
18
25 00
00
10 00
81
65 00
39
55 00
66
25 00
23
20 01
26
75
26
20 00
04
00
25 00
26
65 00
70
65
01
00 00
13
00
10
44
10 00
00
53
25 00
21
95 00
34
55
45 00
28
00
13
95 00
20
40 00
18
55 00
05
45 00
39
30 00
66
60 00
20
40 00
91
70 00
16
00 00
37
95 00
44
60 00
26
40 00
11
20 00
92
65
12
00
45 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4729
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2 2) Pinnaipalem ( Contd....)
In between Sy. No.1 & 341 (Crossing Land) Inbetween Sy. No.151 & 4 (Government Land ) 3) Ramannagudem
50
51
52
55
56
62
63
68
69
70
10
4) Venkataramapuram
11
11Part (Crossing Land )
16
45
46
47
46
57
58
59
7 (Government Land )
78
78 Part (Crossing Land )
79
9
Inbetween Sy. No.59 & 78 (Crossing Land) 5) Yendlapalli
357
359
573 (Government Land )
576
577
589
593
597
598
599
604
605
3
4
5 00
20
05
15 00
05
34
15 00
70 00
63
00
15
02
61
20 00
50 00
38
31
90 00
37
95 00
00
19
50
50 00
63
00
00
65 00
00
95
35
44
00
25 00
08
36
05 00
77
70 00
10
00
00
00
00
00
65
50 00
00
15
95
10 00
62
60
75 00
35 01
46
00
00
32
00
19
95
27
65 00
61
45 00
05
00
90
62
10 00
60
72
00
50 00
08
56
00 00
23
80 00
00
85
35
55
00 00
00
85 00
13
75 00
35
34
00
70 00
09
20
00 00 4730
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
5 5) Yendlapalli (Contd....)
614
00
40
06
00
55
30 Inbetween Sy. No. 604& Vil.Boundary. (Crossing Land)
[No. L-14014/25/2003-G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2003
का . आ. 1837.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एण्ड इन्फास्ट्रकचर कंपनी लिमिटेड की संवर्धक कंपनी मेसर्स रिलायंस इण्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के गोवा के उत्तरी/ दक्षिणी अपतट में खोज व्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश के संरचनाओं से आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य में नल्गोंडा जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मैसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एण्ड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइने विछाई जानी चाहिए;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइने बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधसूचना से उपाबघ्द अनुसूची में वर्णित हैं, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः, अव , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्षित भूमि में हितवध्द है, उस तारीख से जिसमें उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर पाइपलाइने बिंछाए जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के लिए श्री पी. बुच्चारेडडी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, जी.ई.टी.सी.एल पाइप लाइन परियोजना , 409 , ' सी' एवरेस्ट व्लाक, आदित्या इन्क्लेव , अमीरपेट, हैदराबाद, आन्ध्र प्रदेश पिन 500038 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5 , 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
अनुसूची मंडल:
आत्माकूर
जिल्हा: नल्गोंडा गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सं . । सब डिविजन सं .
1
2 1 ) दूपल्लि
705
709
714
गॉवसीमा और 705 का बीच में (गवर्नमेन्ट
ल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 714 और गॉवसीमा का बीच में (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड) मंडल 3 नक्रेिकल्
जिल्हा नल्गोंडा 1) पालेम
118
120
125
128
130
131
132
134
135
135 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
136
137
140
56
65
66
66 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
67
67 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
68
74
75
76
93
94
95
सर्वे सं 125 और 128 का बीच में (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 95 और 76 का बीच में (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
4731 राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
एरिया
हेक्टर
एर
सिएर 3
4
5 00
23
50 00
53
40 00
51
55 00
42
05 00
05
45 राज्य : आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
00
00
35 00
50
10 00
78
80 00
26
90 00
20
00 00
81
90 00
50
35 00
00
10 00
37
60 00
03
75
00
61
45
00
51
40
00
01
35
00
00
10
00
75
20
00
11
85
00
15
30
01
00
85
00
03
30
00
79
70
00
34
30
00
53
30
00
59
15
00
02
20
00
67
45
00
32
90
00
03
05
00
02
60- THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
4732
2 1
जिल्हा 3 नल्गोंडा मंडल : नारकेटपल्लि
1211
1) अम्मनाबोलू
1213
1214
1220
1221
1251
1286
1291
1292
1293
471
522
523
524
600
601
607
608
624
625
626
629
630
631
637
638
639
640
641
749
752
753
758
760
765
766
767
768
875
876
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
5
4
3
राज्य : आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
40
28
00
65
12
00
30
13
00
70
09
00
70
72
00
70
70
00
75
94
00
45
35
00
00
44
00
35
33
00
75
12
00
40
16
00
80
04
01
65
99
00
95
74
00
45
01
00
15
49
00
45
02
00
40
30
00
60
19
00
20
07
00
95
03
00
25
06
00
10
00
00
05
13
00
75
03
00
85
13
00
60
18
00
20
00
00
25
30
00
15
19
00
70
34
00
55
16
00
30
87
00
75
06
00
55
08
00
60
07
00
50
07
00
25
20
00
70
33
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4733
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2
877
1 ) अम्मनाबोलू ( निरंतर )
884
885
886
890
920
921
926
927
928
929
सर्वे सं 1211 और 1213 का बीच में
(गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 251 और 1286 का बीच में (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 471 और 749 का बीच में (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
सर्वे से 875 और 1211 का बीच में
(गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 875 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड) मंडल : रामन्नापेटा
जिल्हा : नल्गोंडा
100
1) बच्चुप्पल
101
102
103
114
115
116
85
86
88
89
93
94
96
97
98
सर्वे से 86 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड) 2) कुंकुडुपामुला
1 (ईनाम सवारम्)
11 (ईनाम सारम्)
12
15
1734G12003-6
4
3
5 00
26
50
18
50 00
00
29
65 00
39
10. 00
41
35
11
00
30
39
00
70 00
18
85 00
34
05
15
00
75
36
00
40 00
05
65
06.
00
20 00
15
09
00
04
70 00
07
80 राज्य : आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
53
00
00 00
01
05
65 00
39
00
51
30 00
19
90 00
50
95 00
35
30
92
00
75 00
90
49
00
01
80 00
63
20
08
00
90
54
00
75
41
00
45
27
65 00
00
48
05 00
03
60 00
55
01
00
13
00 00
27
56 00
42
35 4734
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2
16
2) कुंकुडुपामुला ( निरंतर )
17
19
2 (ईनाम सवारम्)
24
25
28
29
3 (ईनाम सवारम्)
30
31
32
33 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
34
37
38
39
4(ईनाम सवारम्)
9 (ईनाम सवारम्)
सर्वे से 12-11 का वीच में ( ईनाम सवारम्) (कासिंगल्यान्ड)
सर्वे से 28 और 19 का बीच में ( कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
109
3 ) पल्लेवाडा
117
118
119
126
130
131
132
134
135
136
139
140
142(गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
143
147
79
80
सर्वे सं 109 और गॉवसीमा का वीच में (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]
5 3
4
00
86
55
60
00
75
33
65 00
95
22
00
90 00
25
00
00
10
55 00
09
00
06
85
20 00
20
65 00
10
14
00
50
09
55 00
07
60 00
00
03
75
20 00
22
83
25 00
40 00
00
65 00
09
22
35 00
05
25 00
00
04
05 01
60
90 00
53
45
80 00
/56
20 00
00
25 00
20
00
18
55
05
07
00
00
35
55
55
11
00
90
06
00
41
20 00
17
15 00
55 00
21
04
35 00
16
15 00
00 00
77
40
02
00
26
00
15
26
95 00 4735
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2 1
176
4) सूरारम्
117
5) येन्नावरम्
118
121
122
123
-123 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड )
124
125
126
128
129
133
135
137
156
जिल्हा : नल्गोंडा मंडल : शालिगौरारम्
15
1) अड्लूर
17
18
19
252
253
254
255
256
257
260
261
268
270
276
279
309
310
311
312
313
314
320
329
5
4
3
30
23
00
30
27
00
60
21
00
00
55.
00
55
35
00
05
42
01
70
07
00
65
74
00
55
64
00
10
17
00
65
49
00
95
02
00
50
55
00
50
46
00
80
00
01
75
00
00
आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
राज्य
60
25
00
75
34
00
85
03
00
05
01
00
50
60
00
35
30
00
35
84
00
75
08
00
16
10 00
25
20
00
05
46
00
10
00
00
45
61
00
85
10
00
50
17
00
65
46
00
85
44
-00
55
00
00
60
24
00
45
28
00
25
55
00
10
10
00
25
08
00
53
75 00 4736
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2
330
1) अड्लूर ( निरंतर )
341
342
359
360
365
4
4 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
7
सर्वे सं 359 और 365 का बीच में
(कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
100
2) अककावरम्
102
103
105
106
107
108
110
111
112
144
145
145 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
168
169
171/
173/1 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
173/2(गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
219
220
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
235
236
237
244
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]
4
3
5
88
00
10 00
96
15 00
00
50 00
66
65 00
53
05 00
03
75 00
33
25 00
27
75 00
15
25 00
32
15 00
00
30 00
24
30 00
25
47
00
30
40 00
40
25
10 00
3,6
62
0:0
15 00
35
05
45
0.0
95 00
11
95 00
54
50 00
71
20
06
00
60 00
57
40 00
27
40 00
78
00 0.0
20
25
00
10
30 00
41
70 00
70
55
00
13
25 00
07
60 00
08
65 00
06
05 00
07
60
41
00
55 00
01
95
40
14
00
DO
86
30 00
19
85 00
64
80 [भाग - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4737
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़14, 1925
2 1
245
2) अककाबरम् ( निरंतर )
246
247
68
70
83
84
85
90
93
98
99
सर्वे सं 144 और 111 का बीच में
(कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 84 और 85 का बीच में (कासिंग
ल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 90 और 83 का बीच में (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
113
3) भैरुनीबंडगा
113 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
114
115
116
118
119
133
134
147
148
149
150
153
180 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
169
189का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड).
246
5
4
3
80 00
43
27
15 00
40 00
44
80
61
00
65
58
00
79
05 00
25
71
00
35
84
00
45
01
01
43
35 01
20
85
00
38
00 00
07
05 00
70
12
00
25
17
00
25 00
86
30
06
00
75
64
00
65
34
00
40
49
00
05
53
00
80
39
00
82
05 00
10
00
00
65 00
66
60
29
00
20
89
00
95
31
00
40
03
00
85
10
00
35
08
00
10
31
00
95
07
00
15 00
00
45
03
00
35
28
00
35
00
00
90
67
00
55
05
00
55
01
00 4738
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2
247
3) भैरुनीबंडाा ( निरंतर )
248
249
250
251
253
254
266
267
268
सर्वे सं 116और 118 का बीच में
(कासिंगल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 133 और 147 का बीच में
(कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
233
4) पेरका कोंन्डारम्
234
235
237
238
239
240
243
244
245
246
247
250
251
299
301
302
303
304
306
352
353 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
403
404
406
409
420
421
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 3
4
5 00
14
35 00
15
80 00
14
10 00
17
45 00
26
15 00
40
58
00
10
70 00
65
75
63
00
60 00
67
60 00
06
45 00
14
15 01
04
20 00
00
65
00
43
35 00
33
15 00
03
75 00
62
05 00
35
27
00
05
80 00
40
50 00
38
50 00
10
25 00
32
25 -00
70
40 00.
22
90 00
10
07
00
01
10 00
04
05 00
15
35 00
19
40 00
41
10 00
63
00 00
90
55
00
60
08
00
24
90 00
20
05 00
18
05 00
13.
30
00
00
35 भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[ भाग II -खण्ड 3( ii) ]
1
2
437
4) पेरका कोंन्डारम् ( निरंतर )
438
439
576
577
587
588
590
596
599
600
601
602
614
615
616
617
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
640
सर्वे सं 250 और 306 का बीच में
(कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 439 और 576 का बीच में
(कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
186
5) तक्केल्लापहाड्
31
6) वदिदपामुला
मंडल : वोलिगोंडा
जिल्हा : नल्गोंडा
431
1) आरूर
431 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
432
433.
439
497
498
499
500
507
4739
4
5 3
00
24
80
10 00
00
64
50 00
00
68
90
00
60 00
13
25 00
18
00
35
44
00
30
08
00
20
00
00
60
36
00
75
05 00
06
00
75
09
00
05
35 00
26
25 00
05
05
00
00
25
15
00
55 00
50
35
02
00
50 00
21
45
56
00
15 00
65
20 00
53
60 00
02
85 00
06
25 00
06
95
63
65 00
00 00
15
राज्य : आन्ध्रा प्रदेश
00
80
43
00
01
65
38
85 00
00
14
30 00
14
00 00
03
05 00
25
65
32
00
90
60 00
09
45
01
00 4740
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2
508
1) आरूर ( निरंतर )
509
511
513 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
514
514 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
515
525
526
527
694
696
697
698
703
703 का भाग
704
704 का भाग
705
748
749
750
752
753
816
817
सर्वे सं 696 और 816 का वीच में
(कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
सर्वे से 753 और 703 का वीच में (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
154
2) चित्तापूर
1
3) गंगापूर
2
20
21
24
2.5
33
34
68
69
8
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 3
4
5 00
08
35 00
16
25 00
48
80 00
00
10
80
00
85 00
02
25 00
70
20 00
00
45
18
01
65
75 00
67
00
45
65
26
00
25 00
70
80 00
59
30
70 00
44
00 00
03
29
70 00
00
05
00 00
22
75 00
25
60 00
44
40 00
77
40
95 00
83
00
09
05 00
21
55 00
46
10
14
00
50
06
20 00
00
75
18
00
26
40 00
20
11
00
85
54
00
79
95 00
10
20
20 00
14
00
36
95 00
50
67
00
00
10 00
10
35
00
40
07 4741
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2 1
117
4) कंचनापल्लि
118
119
131
139
141
142
155
157
165
166
167
167 का भाग (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
168
168 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
182
185
187
188
210
238
239
241
242
258
258 का भाग (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
259
259का भाग (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
263
266
304
5) पहिल्यानपूर
305
306
307 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
311
313
314
316
440
6) पुल्गुल् अलियास पुलिगिल्ला
441
1734G12003-7
5
4
3
35
60
00
10 00
56
72
85 00
69
85 00
71
45 00
00
45
00
25 00
76
95 00
79
30 00
36
71
60 00
70
48
00
65
67
00
05
04
00
30
12
01
05
00
25
90
06
00
15
75
00
80
73
00
30
71.
00
80
19
00
10
00
00
00
45
88
00
87
00
74
10 00
15
03
00
03
00 00
60
95 00
00
01
00
10
00
00
85 01
13
05
06
00
40
68
00
50 00
12
15
02
00
50
42
00
40
14
00
20
33
00
38
65 00
20 00
30
95
87
00 4742
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2
49
7) अंकिशाला ( निरंतर )
55
59
60
61
62
63
65
65 का भाग ( कासिंग ल्यान्ड )
66
66 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
67
67 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
68
75
76
77
78
82
83
84
87
88
91
सर्वे से 84 और 83 का वीच में
(गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
11
8) येलुवरती
12 (गवर्नमेन्टल्यान्ड)
13
14
193
2
23
24
25
25 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
26
26 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
271
272
273
281
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 3
5
4
00
03
35 00
01
65 00
18
45 00
91
75 00
61
80 00
59
05 00
46
40 00
67
50 00
00
50 00
04
95 00
02
50 00
23
60 00
01
90 00
17
20 00
49
55 00
46
45 00
36
85 00
36
20 00
19
90 00
72
85 00
63
15 00
46
30 00
75
55 00
08
40 00
06
30 00
32
05 00
00
70 00
30
95 00
08
40 001
07
15 00
06
35 00
1.0
30 00
17
30 00
41
35 00
04
00 00
22
95` 00
09
20 00
04
65 00
21
70 00
21
15 00
14
20 4743
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2 1
3
8) येलुवरती ( निरंतर )
309
311
312
315
316
317
319
320
335 (गवर्नमेन्ट ल्यान्ड)
337
338
340
341
347
356
357
358
379
380
381
381 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
383
384
384 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
389
4
610
611
612
613
617
786
787
788
789
790
790का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
सर्वे सं 281 ओर 3 का वीच में (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
155
9) वेमुलाकोंडगा
156
4
5 3
20
05
00
45
19
00
80
05
00
85
06
00
10 00
15
65 00
09
15
08
00
80 00
26
55
25
00
30
00
00
09
00
45
90
29
00
65 00
18
05
02
00
00
55 00
80
16
00
55
41
.00
60 00
80
70
29
00
30
49
00
65
18
00
00
00
10
15
76
00
50
20 00
04
20 00
00 00
06
95 00
07
43
60 00
10
47
00
50 00
09
97
80 00
30
02
00
00
20 00
71
50 00
60 00
12
55 00
91
80 00
47
00
05
01
00
04
55
45 00
43
00
32
00 4744
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2
157
9) वेमुलाकोंडा ( निरंतर )
159
160
162
163
164
172
186
187
206
207
208
209
222
223
224
225
227
228
252
253
275
276
277
278
283
284
313
314
315
316
322
323
324
329
330
331
332
368
369
373
374
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( in) ] 3
4
5 00
46
25 00
31
45 00
21
60 00
52
60 00
33
05 00
46
15 00
01
15 00
86
65 00
72
55 00
06
05 00
16
65 00
11
70 00
02
25 00
00
15 00
22
10 00
21
25 00
31
50 00
77
70, 00
18
85 00
95
05 00
40
20 00
83
05 00
34
95 00
16
30 00
25
80 00
81
05 00
20
47
00
80
95 00
40
75 00
25
33
00
17
95 00
21
10 00
71
80 00
43
95 00
09
00 00
51
00 00
03
65 00
44
85 00
02
50 00
47
40 00
45
55 00
23
25 4745 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
4
5
3
2
1
50
61
00
377
9) वेमुलाकोंडा ( निरंतर )
25
00
02
379
75
09
00
सर्वे सं 253 और 228 का बीच में
(कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
06
65
00
सर्वेसं 369 और 332 का बीच में (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
25
02
01
78
10) वेंकटापुरम्
20
00
13
86
55
31
00
89
02
25
00
90
27
30
00
92
10
40
00
96
80
38
00
98
35
11
00
98 का भाग (कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
20
05
00
सर्वे सं 78 और गॉवसीमा का बीच में
(कासिंग ल्यान्ड)
[फा. सं. एल.-14014/24/2003- जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
New Delhi , 2nd July, 2003
S. O. 1837.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the Natural Gas from the exploration blocks in the Northern/ Southern Offshore ofGoa and structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited, the promoter Company of M/sGas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of Nalgonda Districts in the State of Andhra Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri P. Butcha Reddy. Competent Authority, GTICL Pipeline Project, 409, 'c' Everest Block, Aditya Enclave , Ameerpet, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh Pin - 500038.
-4746
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
Schedule
Mandal:Atmakur
District: Nalgonda Village
Survey No./Sub-Division No.
2 1
1) Dupalli
705
709
714
Between 714 & Vg . Boundary (Govemment Land ) Between Vg. Boundary & 705 (Govemment Land ) Mandal : Nakrekal
District :
State: Andhra Pradesh
Area of ROU
C-Are
Are
Hectare
3
5
4
50
23
00
00
53
40 00
51
55
05
45 00
05 00
42
Andhra Pradesh State:
Nalgonda
1) Palem
118
120
125
128
130
131
132
134
135
135Part
00
35 00
00
10
50
80 00
78
26
00
90 00
20
00 00
81
90
50
35 00
10 00
00
37
60 00
03
75 00
(Crossing Land )
136
137
140
56
65
66
66Part
61
45 00
51
40 00
00
01
35
10
00
00
20
75
00
85 00
11
30
15
00
(Crossing Land )
67
67 Part (Crossing Land )
68
74
75
76
93
94
95
Between 125 & 128 (Crossing Land) Between 95 & 76 (Crossing Land)
85
00
01
00
30
03
70 00
79
30
34
00
30 00
53
00
15
59
02
20 00
67
45 00
32
90 00
03
00
05
60 00
02 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4747
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2 Mandal : Narketpally
District :
3
4
5
Nalgonda
1) Ammanbaolu
1211
1213
1214
1220
1221
1251
1286
1291
1292
1293
471
522
523
524
600
601
607
608
624
625
626
629
630
631
637
638
639
640
641
749
752
753
758
760
765
766
767
768
875
875Part (Crossing Land )
876
State: Andhra Pradesh 00
28
40 00
12
65 00
13
30 00
09
70 00
72
70 00
70
70. 00
94
75 00
35
45 00
44
00 00
33
35 00
12
75 00
16
40 01
04
80 00
99
65 00
74
95 00
01
45 00
49
15 00
02
45 00
30
40 00
60
19
00
07
20 00
03
95 00
06
25 00
00
10 00
13
05 00
03
75 00
13
85 00
18
60 00
00
20 00
30
25 00
19
15 00
34
70 00
16
55 00
87
30 00
06
75 00
08
55
00
07
60
00
07
50
00
20
25
00
07
80
00
33
70 4748
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
2 1
877
1) Ammanbaolu ( Contd ....)
884
885
886
890
920
921
926
927
928
929
Between 1211 & 1213 (Govemment Land )
Between 1251 & 1286 (GovemmentLand ) . Between 471 & 749 (GovemmentLand ) Between 875 & 1211 (Govemment Land )
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
5 3
4
50
26
00
18
50 00
65
29
00
10
39
00
35 00
41
30
11
00
70 00
39
85
18
00
05
34
00
75
15
00
36
40. 00
65
05
00
06
20 00
15
09
00
70
04
00
Andhra Pradesh State:
Nalgonda
District:
Mandal: Ramannapet
100
1) Bachuppala
101
102
103
114
115
116
85
86
86Part (Crossing Land )
88
89
93
94
96
97
98
2) Kunkudupamula
1 ( Inam Savaram)
11 (Inam Savaram)
12
15
16
17
00
53
00
05
01
00
65
39
00
30
51
00
19
90 00
50
95 00
30
35
00
92
00
75
90
49
00
60 00
03
80
01
00
20
63
00
90 00
08
75
54
00
41
45 00
65
27
00
05
48
00
01
55 00
00 00
13
55
27
00
35 00
42
55
86
00
60
75 00 4749
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2 1
2) Kunkudupamula (Contd....)
19
2( Inam Savaram)
24
25
28
29
3( Inam Savaram)
30
31
32
33. (Government Land )
34
37
38
39
4( Inam Savaram)
9 ( Inam Savaram)
Between 12 & 11 ( Inam Savaram) (Crossing Land ) Between 28 &19 (Crossing Land)
3) Pallevada
109
117
118
119
126
130
131
132
134
135
136
139
140
142 (Government Land )
143
147
79
80
Between 109 & Vill Bound (GovemmentLand) 4) Suraram
176
1734GI2003-8
4
5 3
00
33
65 00
22
95 00
25
90 00
10
00
55 00
09
85 00
06
20 00
20
65 00
10
14
50 00
09
00
55 00
60
07
00
75
03
20 00
22
25 00
83
00
00
40
09
65 00
22
35 00
25 00
05
05 00
04
90 01
60
00
45
53
56
80 00
00
00
20
20
25 00
55
18
00
07
05 00
35
55 00
11
00
55 00
06
90
20 00
41
00
17
15
55 00
21
00
04
35
16
00
15
77
00 00
00
02
40 00
26
15
26
95 00
30 00
23 4750
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2 5) Yennavaram
117
118
121
122
123
123Part
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 3
4
5 00
27
30 00
21
60 00
55
00 00
35
55 01
42
05 00
07
70
(Crossing Land )
124
125
126
128
129
133
135
137
156
Mandal : Shali Gowraram
District:
00
74
65 00
64
55 00
17
10 00
49
65 00
02
95 00
55
50 00
46
50 01
00
80 00
00
75 State: Andhra Pradesh
Nalgonda
1) Adloor
15
17
18
19
252
253
254
255
256
257
260
261
268
270
276
279
309
310
311
312
313
314
320
329
330
00
25
60 00
34
75 00
03
85 00
01
05 00
60
50 00
30
35 00
84
35 00
08
75 00
16
10 00
20
25 00
46
05 00
00
10 00
61
45 00
10
85
17
00
50 00
46
65 00
85
44
00
00
55 00
24
60 00
28
45 00
55
25
10
00
10 00
08
25 00
53
75 00
88
10 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4751
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2 1) Adloor (Contd.... )
341
342
359
360
365
4
4Part (Crossing Land)
7
Between 359 & 365 (Crossing
Land)
2) Akkavaram
100
102
103
105
106
107
108
110
111
112
144
145
145Part 3
4
5
96
00
15
00
00
50
66
00
65
53
00
05
03
00
75
25 00
33.
00
27.
75 00
15
25
32
00
15
00
00
30
24
30 00
47
00
25
30
40 00
00
25
40
36
00-
10 00
62
15
05
00
35
45
95 00
11
00
95 00
54
50 00
71
20 00
06
60
(Crossing Land )
168
169
171/A
173/1 (Government Land )
173/2 (Government Land )
219
220
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
235
236
237
244
245
57
00
40 00
27
40 00
78
00 00
25
20 00
10
30
70 00
41
70
55
00
00
13
25 00
07
60
08
00
65 00
06
05 00
07
60 00
55
41
00
01
95
14
40 00
00
86
30 00
19
85 00
64
80
80
43
00 4752
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ASABHA- 14, 1925
1
2 2) Akkavaram(Contd ....)
246
247
68
70
83
84
85
90
93
98
99
Betwee 144-111 (Crossing Land)
Between 84 & 85 (Crossing Land) Between 90 & 83 (Crossing Land)
3) Bhairunibanda-
113
113 Part. (Crossing Land)
114
115
116
118
119
133
134
147
148.
149
150-
153
180 (Governrnent Land) -
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
189 Part (Crossing Land )
246
247
248
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 3
4
5
27
00
15
44
40 00
80
61.
00
58
65 00
79
05 00
/1
25 00
84
35 01
01
45 01
43
35 00
20
85
00
38
0,0 00
07
05 00
12
70 00
17
25
86
00
25
06
30 00
00
64
75
34
00
65 00
49
40 00
53
05 00
39
80
82
00
05
00
00
10 00
66
65 00
29
60 00
89
20 00
31
95
03
00
40 00
10
85
08
35 00
00
31
10 00
07
95 00
00
15 00
03
45 00
28
35
35 00
00
00
90
67
05
55 00
00
01
55 00
14
35 00
15
80 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4753
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़14, 1925
2
1
3) Bhairunibanda (Contd.... )
249
250
251
253
254
266
267
268
4
3
5 00
14
10
17
45 00
26
15 00
00
40
58
70 00
10
00
65
75
63
00
60 00
67
60
45 00
06
(Crossing
15
14
00
(Crossing
Between 116 & 118 Land) Between 133 & 147 Land)
4) Perkakondaram
233
234
235.
237 .
238
239
240
243
244
245
246
247
250
251
299
301
302
303
304
306
352
353 (Government Land )
403
404
406
409
420
421
437
438
439
01
20
04
65
00 00
35 00
43
00
33
15 00
03
75
62
05 00
35
27
00
05
80 00
00
50
40
50
38
00
00
10
25 00
32
25 00
70
40
22
90 00
07
10 00
01
10 00
00
04
05
15
00
35 00
40
19
41
10 00
63
00 00
90 00
55
08
00
60
24
00
90 00
20
05 00
05
18
30 00
13
00
00
35
24
80 00
00
10 00
64
50 00 4754
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ ASADHA 14 , 1925
1
2 4) Perkakondaram ( Contd.... )
576
577
587
588
590
596
599
600
601
602
614
615
616
617
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
640
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] 3
4
5 00
68
90 00
00
60 00
13
25 00
18
35 00
44
30 00
08
20 00
00
60
36
00
75. 00
06
05 00
09
75 00
35
05
00
26
25 00
05
05 00
25
00
00
15
55 00
50
35 00
02
50 00
21
45
56
15 00
00
65
20 00
60
53
02
00
85 00
06
25 00
06
95
(Crossing
Between 250 & 306 (Crossing Land) Between 439 & 576 Land)
5) Takkellapahad
186
6) Vaddipamula
31
Mandal : Voligonda
District : Nalgonda.
1)Aroor
431
431Part (Crossing Land )
432
433
439
497
498
499
500
507
508
509
511
00
63
65 00
15
00 State: Andhra Pradesh 00
43
80 00
65
01
00
38
85 00
14
30
14
00 00
05 00
03
00
25
65- 00
90
32
00
09
60 00
01
45 00
08
35 00
16
25 00
80
48 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4755
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/ अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2 1)Aroor( Contd.... )
513 (Government Land )
514
514Part (Crossing Land )
515
525
526
527
694
696
697
698
703
703 Part
704
704 Part
705
748
749
750
752
753
816
817
Between 696 & 816 (Crossing Land)
Between 753 & 703 (Crossing Land)
2) Chithapur
154
3) Gangapur
1
2
20
21
24
25
33
34
68
69
8
4) Kanchanapali
117
118
119
131
3
4
5 00
00
10 00
80
85 00
02
25 00
70
20 00
00
45 01
18
65 00
67
75 00
45
65 00
26
25 00
70
80 00
59
30 00
44
70 00
03
00 00
29
70 00
05
00 00
22
75 00
25
60 00
44
40 00
77
40 00
83
95 00
09
05 00
21
55
46
00
10 00
14
50 00
06
20 00
18
75 00
26
40 00
11
20 00
54
85 00
79
95 00
10
20 00
14
20
36
00
95 00
67
50 00
00
10 00
35
10 00
07
40 00
60
35 00
10
56
00
72
85 00
69
85 4756
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
2 1
139
4) Kanchanapalli (Contd ....)
141
142
155
157
165
166
167
167 Part
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
4
5 3
45
71
00
00
45
00
25 00
76
79
95 00
30
36
00
60
71
00
70 00
48
67
65 00
05
04
00
(Government Land )
168
168Part (Crossing Land )
182
185
187
188
210
238
239
241
242
258
258Part
12
30 01
05
25 00
90
06
00
15
75
00
73
80 00
71
30 00
19
80 00
10 00
00
45 00
88
00
87
00
74
10 00
15
03
.00
00
03
00
(Government Land )
259
259Part
60
95 00
00
01
00
(Government Land )
263
266
5) Pahelwanpur
304
305
306
307 (Govemment Land )
311
313
314
316
440
6) Puigul alias Puligilla
441
7) Sunkisala
49
55
59
60
61
62
10 00
00
85 01
13
05
06
00
40
68
00
50
12
00
02
15 00
50
42
00
14
40 00
20
33
00
65 00
38
20
30
00
95 00
87
35 00
03
65 00
01
45
18
00
75 00
91
80 00
61
05
59
00 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4757
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
2 7) Sunkisala(Contd.... )
63
65
65Part (Crossing Land )
66
66Part (Crossing Land)
67
67 Part (Crossing Land )
68
75
76
77
78
82
83
84
87
88
91
4
3
5
46
00
40 00
67
50 00
00
50 00
95
04
00
02
50 00
23
60 00
01
90 00
17
20 00
49
55 00
46
45 00
36
85 00
36
20 00
19
90 00
72
85 00
15
63
00
46
30 00
75
55 00
40
08
00
06
30
(Government
Between 84 & 83 Land)
8) Veluvarthy
11
12 (Government Land )
13
14
193
2
23
24
25
25Part (Crossing Land )
26
26Part (Crossing Land )
271
272
273
281
3
309
311
312
315
316
173461/03-9
32
00
05 00
70
00
00
30
95 00
40
08
00
07
15 00
06
35 00
10-
30 00
17
30 00
35
41
04
00
00 00
22
95 00
09
20
04
00
65 00
21
70
21
00
15 00
14
20 00
05
20 00
19
45 00
05
80 00
06
85
10
15
00
00
09
65 4758
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
1
2 8) Veluvarthy(Contd ....)
317
319
320
335 (Govemment Land )
337
338
340
341
347
356
357
358
379
380
381
381 Part (Crossing Land)
383
384
384Part (Crossing Land )
389
4
610
611
612
613
617
786
787
788
789
790
790Part
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
4
5 3
00
08
15 00
80
26
00
55
25
30
00
00
09
45 00
90 00
29
65 00
18
02
05 00
00
55 00
16
80 00
55 00
41
80
60 00
70
29
00
30 00
49
18
65 00
00 00
10
15
76
00
20
50
00
20 00
04
06
00 00
07
95 00
60 00
43
10 00
47
00
09
50 00
97
80
02
30 00
00
20 00
50 00
71
60
12
00
55 00
91
00
80
47
01
05 00
(Crossing Land )
Between 281 & 3 (Crossing Land)
9)Vemulakonda
155
156
157
159
160
162
163
164
00
55
04
00
45
43
32
00 00
25 00
46
00
31
45
. 21
60 00
00
60
52
00
33
05 00
15
46 4759
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2
1
9) Vemulakonda (Contd....)
172
186
187
206
207
208
209
222
223
224.
225
227
228
252
253
275
276
277
278
283
284
313
314
315
3,16
322
323
324
329
330
331
332
368
369
373
374
377
379
4
5 3
01
15 00
65
86
00
55 00
72
06
05 00
65
16
00
70 00
11
25 00
02
15
00
00
10
22
00
25
21
00
50
31
00
70
77
00
18
85 00
05 00
95
20 00
40
05
83
00
34
95 00
00
16
30
80 00
25
05 00
81
20
47
00
95 00
80
75
40
00
25
33
00
95
17
00
10 00
21
80 00
71
95
43
00
00 00
09
51
00 00
65 00
03
85 00
44
02
50 00
47
40 00
55
45
00
25 00
23
00
61
50
25
02
00
09
75 00
(Crossing
06
65 00
(Crossing
Between 253 & 228 Land) Between 369 & 332 Land) 4760
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
4
5 10) Venkatapuram ( Contd....)
78
01
02
25 86
13
00
20 89
00
31
55 90
00
25
02
92
00
27
30 96
10
40
00
38
98
00
80
00
35
11
98Part (Crossing Land )
05
20
00
Between Vill Bound & 78 (Crossing Land )
[No. L-14014/24/2003-G.P.] SWAMI SINGH , Director
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2003
का. आ. 1838.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थाएन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषगी)द्वारा एक पाइप लाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ,
अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है,
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इसे अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन या भूमि के भीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री डी . के. पारेख , सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुन्द्रा भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन, गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी) , पो-बोक्स नं. 43, यूनिट 2, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड, मु. पो . खारी रोहर, तालुका गांधीधाम, गुजरात राज्य को .... लिखित में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 4761
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची
राज्य:- गुजरात
जिला:- कच्छ
तहसील:- रापर
क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदी है तो
सर्वे सँख्या
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
नाला (1 ) . गोविन्दपर
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 98
71/2
नाला
72/2
पैकी
72/1
पैकी
72/1
नाला
77
76/3
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 98
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 98
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 98
66/1
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 98
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 98
कार्ट ट्रेक
141/2
(2). देदरवा
116
117
103/2
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 221
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 221
पैकी
80
435
(3). सई
357/1
362/1
120
पैकी
111
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 892
आर सेन्टी आर हेक्टर
4
50 03
00
55 09
00
62
15
00
85
04
00
46
14
00
35
03
00
37
22
00
54
00
00
77
43
00
22
00
00
00
08
00
56
33
00
32
00
00
80
01
00
55
07
00
78
00
00
05 00
00
50
00
00
24
03
00
17
03
00
06
04
00
74
14
00
00
32
00
33
00
00
63
00
00
32 00
10
61
07
00
61
30
00
10
21
00
62
03
00 4762
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
तहसील: - रापर
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
जिला:- कच्छ
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सँख्या
भाग यदी है तो 1
2
3 (4) . किडीयानगर
591/5
590/2
589/3
585
685
693/2
691/4
नाला
811/1
812/2
ट्रार्वम 1318 पकी
पकी
ट्रार्वम 1318
पकी
ट्रार्वस 1318/11
947/2
947/1
पकी
ट्रार्चम 1318
नाला
971/1
पकी
970
पंकी
968/1
ट्रार्वम 1318 पकी
कार्ट ट्रक
1189/2
1188/2
1187/2
1187/1
पैकी
पकी
ट्रार्वम 1318
नाला
पकी
ट्रार्वस 1318
29
(5) . बादलपर
21/1
राज्य:- गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
हक्टर आग मन्टी आग
4
00
07
82 00
00
39 00
12
24 00
00
67 00
00
07 00
02
54 00
03
25 00
13
12 00
16
55 00
23
25 00
00
83 00
20
33 00
31
59 00
07
50 00 19
74 00
08
92 00
02
18 00
18
95 00 10
24 00 .36
60 00
02
22 00
00
62 00
24
92 00
09
60 00
17
42 00
19
92 00
00
78 00
01
10 00
16
91 00 01
32 00
07
12 4763
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5 , 2003/अषाढ़14 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
राज्य:- गुजरात
जिला:- कच्छ
तहसील:- रापर
क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदी है तो
सर्वे सँख्या
गाँव का नाम
2
1
91/3
(6) . छोटापर
84
पैकी
83
पैकी
73
(7). वेकरा
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 129
944/1
(8). भीमासर
944/2
945/1
938/3
952
पैकी
921
908/3
795/2
781/2
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 2220/1
810/2
पैकी
812/1
819
825
836/2
835/2
835/3
843/2
844
853/2
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 2220/1
2191/1
2182
पैकी
2179/4
2175/2
मन्टी आर
आग्
हेक्टर
4
3
51
15
00
45
00 08
74
00
27
41
26
00
81
06
00
53
06
00
48
00
00
74
11
00
05
20
00
97
16
00
49
00
26
16
00
00
64
11
00
कार्ट ट्रेक
66
00
00
80
01
00
94
02
00
01
64
00
07
35
00
90
03
00
00
95
04
49
00 00
23
04
00
32
00
00
03
78
00
00
48
00
42
00
00
36
00
07
06
19
00
00
14
00
00
99
00
26
00
00 4764
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 / ASADHA 14, 1925
तहसीलः - रापर
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
जिला: - कच्छ
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सँख्या
1
2
2152/2
2151/1
(8). भीमासर (जारी... )
2146/2 पैकी
2129/1
2127
पैकी
2120/1
2119/2
2118
2116/2
2114/1
2112/2
2111/1
2110/2
2110/3
2109/1
2108/3
2210
2055/6
2055/7
2054/4
पैकी
2051/3 पैकी
2051/2 पकी
2050/3
2049/3
2046/2
2042/2
2041/2
2038/5
2037/4
2037/2
राज्य:- गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदी है तो
आर
हेक्टर
सेन्टी आर 3
4
30
00 01
00
00
16
00
05
22
00
09
04
00
05
76
00
15
08
00
10
28
00
12
54
00
96
05
00
06
48
00
18
12
01
00
52
00
12
79
00
08
92
00
01
46
00
12
66
00
00
17
00
14
04
00
06
31
00 09
10
00
29
02
00
03
95
00
02
48
00
04
92
03
00
97
00
00
51
00 04
15
00
00
33
00
02
65
00
00
42 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4765
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5 , 2003/ अषाढ़ 14, 1925
जिला: - कच्छ
i तहसील:- रापर
सर्वे सँख्या गाँव का नाम
राज्य:- गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदी है तो
2
1
213
पैकी (9). भंगेरा - जदुपूर
219/2
183/1
645/1
(10). आदेसर
645/2
644/3
643
पैकी
642
629/7
629/9
सेन्टी आर
हेक्टर आर
4
3
00 00
35
35
01
00
28 कार्ट ट्रेक
00
00
00
90
00
00 04
90
00 07
00
00 19
07
00 12
56
00
30
21
26
00
09
00
82
12
[फा. सं. आर-31015/10/2002- ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , 2nd July, 2003
S. O. 1838.-Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of crude oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab, through Mundra -Bathinda crude oil pipeline , a pipeline should be laid by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited):
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred hy sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government herehy declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri D.K.Parekh, Competent Authority, Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline , Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindusan Petroleum Corporation Limited) , P.B.No. 43 , Unit 2, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, At and Post Khari Rohar , Taluka Gandhidham, State Gujarat .
1734GI2003-10 4766
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
SCHEDULE
District:- Kutch
State : - Gujarat Taluka : - Rapar
ROU Area
Part ifAny
Survey No
Name of Village
Ha. Ar. Sq.mt.
4
3
2
1
50
03
00
Nala
(1). Govindpar
55
00 09
P
Trowers 98
62
00 15
71/2
04 85
00
Nala
46
14
00
72/2
03 35
00
P
72/1
00 22 37
P
72/1
54
00 00
Nala
00 43 77
77
22
00
00
76/3
P
Trowers 98
56
00 33
P
Trowers 98
32
P
Trowers 98
80
00 01
66/1
55
00 07
P
Trowers 98
78
00 00
P
Trowers 98
00
05
00
Cart Track
00
50
00
141/2
( 2) . Dedarava
24
03
00
116
03 17
00
117
00 04 06
103/2
14 74
00
P
Trowers 221
00 32 00
P
Trowers 221
00 00 33
P
80
63
435
(3). Sai
32
00 10
357/1
61
00 07
362/1
00 30 61
120
00 21 10
P
111
62
00 03
P
Trowers 892 4767 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5 , 2003/अषाढ़14, 1925
District : - Kutch
State : - Gujarat Taluka : - Rapar
ROU Area
PartifAny
Survey No
Name of Village
Ha. Ar . Sq.mt.
4
3
2
1
07 82
00
591/5
(4) . Kidiyanagar
39
00
00
590/2
00 12 24 589/3
00 00 67 585
685
00 02 54 693/2
25
03
00
691/4 .
00 13 12
Nala
00 16 55 811/1
25
00. 23 812/2
83
P
Trowers 1318
00 20 33
P
Trowers 1318
00 31
59
P
Trowers 1318/11
00 07 50 947/2
74
00 19 947/1
92
00 08
P
Trowers 1318
18
00 02
Nala
00
95
18 971/1
P
00 10 24
P
970
00 36 60 968/1
22
00 02
P
Trowers 1318
00 00 62
Cart Track
00 24 92 1189/2
00 09 60 1188/2
42
00 17 1187/2
00 19 92 1187/1
P
00 00 78
P
Trowers 1318
10
00 01
Nala
00 16 91
P
Trowers 1318
32
00 01
29
(5) . Badalpar
ין
00 07
21/1 4768
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
District : Kutch
Taluka: - Rapar
Name of Village Survey No
State: - Gujarat
ROU Area Part ifAny
1
2
91/3
(6) . Chhotapar
84
83
P
73
P (7) . Vekara
Trowers 129 P
944/1
(8) . Bhimasar
944/2
945/1
938/3
P
952
921
908/3
795/2
781/2
Trowers 2220/1 P
810/2
812/1
P
819
825
836/2
835/2
835/3
843/2
844
853/2
Trowers 2220/1 P
2191/1
2182
P
2179/4
2175/2
Ar.
Ha.
Sq.mt.
4
3
00
51
15
00 08 45
00 27 74
41
00 26
81
00 06
00 06 53
00 48
00
00 11 74
05 20
00
00 16 97
00 26 49
16
00 11 64 CartTrack
00 00 66
00 01 80
00 02 94
00 01 64
00 07 35
00 03 90
00 04 95
00 00 49
00 04 23
00
00
32
00 03 78
48
42
00 07 36
00 06 19
00 00 14
00 00 99
00 00 26 4769 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
State : - Gujarat
District:- Kutch
Taluka: - Rapar
ROU Area
Part ifAny
Survey No
Name of Village
Ha. Ar. Sq.mt.
4
3
2
1
01
30
00
2152/2
(8) . Bhimasar
16
00
00
2151/1
(Contd... )
00 05 22 2146/2
P
04 09
00
2129/1
76
00 05
P
2127
15 08
00
2120/1
28
10
00
2119/2
00 12 54 2118
00 05 96 2116/2
48
00 06 2114/1
12
00 18 2112/2
52
00 01
2111/1
00 12 79 2110/2
92
08
00
2110/3
01 46
00
2109/1
00 12 66 2108/3
00 17
00
2210
14
00 04 2055/6
31
00 06 2055/7
10
00 09
P
2054/4
02
00
29
P
2051/3
00 03 95
P
2051/2
48
00 02 2050/3
92
00 04 2049/3
00 03 97 2046/2
51 2042/2
15
00 04 2041/2
33 2038/5
00 02 65
P
2037/4
42 2037/2 4770
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]
District:- Kutch
Taluka : - Rapar
Survey No Name of Village
1
2
213
P (9 ) . Bhangera -
219/2 Jadupur
183/1
645/1
(10 ) . Adesar
645/2
644/3
643
P
642
629/7
629/9
State:- Gujarat
ROU Area PartifAny
Ha. Ar. Sq.mt. 3
4
00 00 35
35
01
00
Cart Track
28
90
00 04 90
00 07 00
00 19 07
00 12 56
00 21 30
00 09 26
82
00 12
[No. R- 31015/10/2002-O.R. - II ]
HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 3 जुलाई , 2003
का. आ. 1839.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल टर्मिनल से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक मुन्द्रा - भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन से होकर अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिमटेड की समनुषगी) द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबध्द अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबध्द है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, उस भूमि में उपयोग के या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री डी.के. पारेख , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा-भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन, गुरू गोबिंद सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी) , पो.बा. नं. 43, यूनिट 2 , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिमटेड, मु. और पोस्ट खारी रोहर, तालुका गाँधीधाम, गुजरात राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 4771
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची
राज्य: गुजरात
जिला : बनासकांठा
तहसील : धानेरा
सर्वेसँख्या गाँव का नाम
2
1
69 (1)खिंमत
1055/1
333
320
353
7 (2) वासटा
10 (3)मांडल
19
91 (4) रामपुरा (वाघपुग)
(521431)/6 (5) आलवाडा
55
110
112
(1+2)/2 (6) कुंडी
17/1
17/1
क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदि हैतो
सेन्टी आर
आर
हेक्टर
4
3
00
10
00
84
01
00
पैकी
10
00
00
17
00
00
पैकी कार्ट ट्रेक
85
02
00
पैक़ी कार्ट ट्रेक
33
00
00
पैकी कार्ट ट्रेक
10
00
00
87
00
00
पैकी
86
00
00
पैकी
00
10
00
00
04
00
69
01
00
मुकाल नदी
31
02
00
पैकी
21
01
00
13
00
00
पैकी
55
03
00
पैकी
49
00
11
पैकी
[फा. सं. आर-31015/48/2002- ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , 2nd July, 2003
S. O. 1839.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of crude oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab , through Mundra - Bathinda crude oil pipeline , a pipeline should be laid by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited):
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user ( ROU) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification:
4772
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 5, 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule , may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act. as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri D.K.Parekh,Competent Authority , Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline . Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindusan Petroleum Corporation Limited) , P.B.No. 43 , Unit 2, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited . At and Post Khari Rohar, Taluka Gandhidham, State Gujarat.
SCHEDULE
District : Banaskantha
Taluka : Dhanera
Name of Village
SurveyNo.
2
1
69 ( 1) Khininat
1055/1
333
320
353
7 (2) Wasda
10 (3) Mandal
19
91 (4) Rampura ( Vaghpura )
(5) Alwada
State: Gujarat
ROU Area PartifAny
Ha.
Ar. Sq. Mt.
4
3
00
10
00
84
00
P
01
00
10
00
00
17
00
P- Cart Track
85
00
02
P - Cart Track
00
00
33 P- Cart Track
00
10
00
87
00
P
00
00
86 P
00
00
00
10
(52+431)/6
55
110
112 (6) Kundi
(1+2)/2
17/1
17/1
00
00
04
69
00
01
Sukal River
02
P
00
31
21
00
P
01
13
00
P
00
00
55
03
P
49 P
00
11
[No. R- 31015/48/2002-O.R. - II ]
HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4773 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5 , 2003/ अषाढ़14, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2003
का. आ. 1840.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 367 , तारीख 31 जनवरी, 2002, का.आ, 2292, तारीख 11 जुलाई , 2002 और का.आ. 3911-12, तारीख 18 दिसम्बर 2002 द्वारा गुजीरत राज्य में जामनगर से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में भोपाल तक जामनगर- भोपाल परियोजना के माध्यम से पुनः गैसीकृत द्रवित प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 30 जनवरी , 2003 से 31 जनवरी , 2003 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;
और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में , जनता की ओर से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नही हुए है;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार, घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से , केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
1734GI2003-11 4774
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची
जिला : खेडा
तेहसील : ठासरा
राज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
गाव का नाम
ब्लोक नंबर
हेक्टर
आरे स्केर मी.
4
2
3
5
0
302
07
70 1. ओजराला
304
0
03
30
0
11
00
टोटल
103
0
39
40 2. जरगाल
0
39
40
टोटल
183/3
0
04
40 3. सोनीपुर
183
00
80
0
183/2
0
00
40
0
182
06
30 180
0
02
50
0
40
14
टोटल
68
0
31
30 4. सांढेली
0
31
30
टोटल
जिला : खेडा
तेहसील : महुधा
राज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
गाव का नाम
ब्लोक नंबर
आरे
हेक्टर
स्केरमी.
4
2
3
5 316
0
00
90 1. निजामपुर
0
00
90
वेटल
[फा. सं. एल.-14014/9/2002-जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक
New Delhi, 2nd July, 2003
S. O. 1840.- Whereas by notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. 367 , dated the 31st January, 2002 , S.O. 2292 dated the 11th July, 2002 and S.O. 3911-12 dated the 18th December, 2002 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962) (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification, for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of regassified liquefied natural gas through the Jamnagar -Bhopal Pipeline Project from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;
4775
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 30th January, 2003 to 31 January, 2003 ;
Andwhereas no objection were received from the public to the laying ofthe pipeline;
And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;
And whereas the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipelines;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4)of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest, on the date of publication of the declaration, in Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
District : KHEDA Tehsil : THASRA
Block No. Name of the Village
2 1
302
1. OZRALA
304
Total
103
2.JARGAL
Total
183/3
3. SONIPUR
183
183/2
182
180
Total
68
4. Sandheli
Total
State: Gujarat
Area Are
Hectare
Sq.Mtr.
5
4
3
07
70 0
30
03
0
00 0
11
39
40 0
40 0
39
40 0
04
00
80 0
00
40 0
30 0
06
0
50
02
40
14
0
30
31
0
30
31
0
District : KHEDA
Tehsil : MAHUDHA
Block No. Name of the Village
2 1
316
1. NIZAMPUR
Total
State : Gujarat
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.Mtr .
5
4
3
00
90 0
0
00
90 [No. L- 14014/9/2002-G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director 4776
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2003
का. आ. 1841.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 370 तारीख 1 फरवरी, 2002, का आ. 1653 तारीख 13 मई, 2002, का. आ. 3683 तारीख 22 नवम्बर 2002 और का. आ. 3684 तारीख 22 नवम्बर , 2002 द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में जामनगर से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में भोपात तक जामनगर- भोपाल पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से पुनः गैसीकृत द्रवित प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एण्ड इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और , उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 20 दिसम्बर, 2002 से 30 दिसम्बर, 2002 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;
और , पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में , जनता की ओर से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नहीं हुए है ;
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की . उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;
अतः, अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त गैस ट्रासपोर्टेशन एडं इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
तालुका : बावला
जिला: अहमदाबाद
राज्य : गुजरात क्षेत्रफल
गाव का नाम
सर्वे नंबर / ब्लोक नंबर
हेक्टर आरे स्केरमी.
1
2
3
4
5 193
1. धनवाडा
0
25
60
टोटल
0
25
60 25
2. सरला
0
43
80
0
43
टोटल
80 3.शियाल
717/2
0
44
10
0
44
येटल
10
[फा. सं. एल.-14014/12/2002-जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 4777 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
New Delhi , 2nd July, 2003
1653 S. O. 1841.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 370, Dated the 1st February , 2002, S.O .. Dated 13th May, 2002, S.O. 3683 Dated 22nd November , 2002 number 50 3684 Dated 22nd November, 2002 issued under sub- section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intntion to acquire the right of user in the lar.d specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of the regassified liquefied natural gas thrugh the Jamnagar - Bhopal Pipeline Project from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh by Gas Transportation & Infrastructure Company Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 20th December , 2002 to 30th December , 2002
And whereas no objections were received from the public to the laying of the pipeline .
And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub- section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;
And whereas the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now , therefore , in exèrcise of the powers conferred by sub section (1 ) of the Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby deciares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest, on the date of publication of the declaration , in Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited free from all encumbrances .
4778
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
SCHEDULE
Taluka : BAVLA
District : AHMEDABAD
State: Gujarat
Survey No./Block No.
Name of the Village
Area Are
Hectare
Sq. Mtr.
1
2
4
3
5 193
1. DHANWADA
0
25
60
Total:-
0
25
60 2. SARLA
25
0
43
80
0
43
Total: -
80 3. SIYAL
0
717/2
44
10
Total: -
44
0
10 Foot note: Notification S.0.370 dated the 1ª February, 2002 was published in the Gazette of India dated the 9th February 2002, Notification S.O.No.1653 dated 13th May, 2002 was published in the Gazette of India dated the 18th May,2002
[No. L - 14014/12/2002-G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2003
का. . 1842.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में जामनगर से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में भोपाल तक पुनः गैसीकृत द्रवित प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने उपशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री ए. के. संघवी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एण्ड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन परियोजना, 304 , अटलान्टा टॉवर, तृतीय तल, इनक्लाब सोसाइटी के सामने, गुलाबी टेकरा, आंबावाड़ी, अहमदाबाद -380015, को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 4779
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अपाढ़ 14, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची
जिला : पंचमहाल तालुका: शहेरा
राज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
सर्वे नंबर / ब्लोक नंबर
गाव का नाम
2 1
170
1. वाघजीपुर
स्केरमी.
आरे
हेक्टर
5
4
3
40
15
0
राज्य: गुजरात
जिला : पंचमहाल
तालुका: गोधरा
क्षेत्रफल
सर्वे नंबर / ब्लोक नंबर
गाव का नाम
2 1
313/2
1. धानीत्रा
315/1/ अ +24 +3 अ
318
707/4
2. धरी
613
707/9+707/ 8+602/1 +601/3
602/3
601/1
561/2
561/1
543
537/1
3. रतनपुर
513/क/3
577/21
577/22
577/23
577/16
577/15
577/10
आरे
स्केरमी.
हेक्टर
4
3
5
50
05
0
50 0
15
11
40 0
03
20 0
00
01
0
20
00
0
70
03
0
06
05
0
03
0
20
60
04
0
50
00
0
10
00
0
70
53
0
70
39
0
70
29
0
40
03
0
40
30
0
00
10 0
0
16
40 [फा. सं. एल.-14014/10/ 2002- जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
New Delhi , 2nd July, 2003
S. O. 1842.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the regassified Liquefied natural gas from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited for implementing Jamnagar- Bhopal pipeline project.
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user (ROU) in the land under which the 4780
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri A.K.Sanghavi , Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited , Pipeline Project , 304, Atlanta Tower, 3rd Floor , Opp . Inqulab Society, Gulbai Tekra, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad- 380 015.
SCHEDULE Taluka : SHEHERA
District : PANCHMAHALS
Survey No./ Block No. Name of the Village
1
2
170
1. VAGHJIPUR
Taluka : GODHRA
State: Gujarat Hectare
Area Are
Sq.Mtr .
4
5 3
0
40
15
District : PANCHMAHALS
Name of the Village
Survey No./ Block No. 1
2 1. DHANITRA
313/2
315/ 1 / A+ 2B+ 3A
318
2. DHARI
707/4
613
707/9 + 707/ 8 +602/ 1 + 601 /3
602/3
601/1
561/2
561/1
543
537/1
3. RATANPUR
513/C/ 3
577/21
577/22
577/23
577/16
577/15
577/10
State: Gujarat Hectare
Area Are
Sq.Mtr .
4
5 3
0
05
50 0
15
50 0
11
40 0
03
20 0
01
00 0
00
20 0
03
70 0
06
05
0
03
20 0
60
04
0
00
50 0
00
10 0
70
53
0
39
70
70 0
29
03
0
40
40 0
30
0
00
10 0
16
40 [No. L-14014/10/2002-G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4781
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2003
का. आ. 1843.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2. खण्ड 3, उपखण्ड (ii ) तारीख 9 फरवरी 2002, में पृष्ठ क्रमांक 1320 से 1341 पर प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 366 तारीख 31 जनवरी, 2002, में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात:-
उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में:-
(i) पृष्ठ 1399 पर, 'धरी" गांव शीर्ष के अधीन सर्वे क्रमांक " 729/1 " के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4और 5 में क्षेत्रफल "00-09-90" के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-10-20 " रखा जाएगा ;
( ii) सर्वे क्रमांक " 729/2" के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल " 00-09-50 के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-10-60′ रखा जाएगा ;
(iii) सर्वे क्रमांक " 727/2 " के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल 00-07-80 के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-11-20" रखा जाएगा ;
(iv) सर्वे क्रमांक "727/3" के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल 00-03-00 " के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-05-80 " रखा जाएगा ;
(v) सर्वे क्रमांक "707/1 " के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल 00-08-70" के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-10-30 रखा जाएगा ;
(vi) सर्वे क्रमांक " 601/3 " के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल "00-03-20" के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल '00-23-10" रखा जाएगा ;
(vii) सर्वे क्रमांक "601/2 " के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल " 00-00-50 " के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल " 00-11-60 रखा जाएगा ;
(viii) सर्वे क्रमांक 597/3 " के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफलं " 00-03-40 " के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-07-40° रखा जाएगा ;
(ix)
सर्वे क्रमांक " 597/2 " के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल 00-03-70′ के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-08-40 ° रखा जाएगा ;
(x) सर्वे क्रमांक "597/1 के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल "00-04-30" के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल " 00-13-20° रखा जाएगा ;
(xi) सर्वे क्रमांक "561/4" के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल 00-00-50 के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-20-60′ रखा जाएगा ;
(xii) सर्वे क्रमांक 561/5" के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल 00-02-50 के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-06-00 ′ रखा जाएगा ;
(xiii) सर्वे क्रमांक "562" के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल " 00-10-90 " के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "00-33-70" रखा जाएगा ;
(xiv) सर्वे क्रमांक "563" के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल "00-02-90" के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल '00-12-70 रखा जाएगा ;
( xv) सर्वे क्रमांक "541/1 " के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल "00-01-60" के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल '00-06-80 रखा जाएगा ;
(xvi) सर्वे क्रमांक "538" के सामने, स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 में क्षेत्रफल " 00-13-50" के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल '00-16-00 रखा जाएगा :
[फा. सं. एल.-14014/10/2002 - जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 1734G12003-12 4782
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 5, 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
New Delhi , 2nd July, 2003
S. O. 1843.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O 366, dated the 31 January, 2002 , published at pages 1342 to 1362 in Part II , section 3 , sub- section ( ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 9th February,2002, namely:-
In this Schedule to the said notification: -
At pages 1360 and 1361 under the heading village " DHARI"
(i) against Survey No. " 729/1 " , for area "0-9-90 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0-10-20 " shall be substituted;
(ii) " 0-10-60" shall be substituted; against Survey No. " 729/2 " , for area "0-9-50 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area (iii) against Survey No." 727/2" , for area "0-7-80 " in columns 3,4 and 5 , the area "0-11-20" shall be substituted;
(iv) against Survey No. " 727/3 " , for area "0-3-00 " in columns 3,4 and 5 , the area "0-05-80" shall be substituted;
(v) against Survey No. " 707/1 " , for area " 0-8-70 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0-10-30 " shall be substituted;
(vi) against Survey No. " 601/3 " , for area "0-03-20 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0-23-10" shall be substituted;
(vii) against Survey No. " 601/2 " , for area "0-0-50 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0-11-60" shall be substituted;
(viii) against Survey No. " 597/3 " , for area "0-3-40 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area " 0-7-40" shall be substituted;
(ix) against Survey No. " 597/2 ", for area ") -3-70 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0-8-40" shall be substituted;
(x) against Survey No. "597/1 " , for area "0-4-30 in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0-13-20" shall be substituted;
(xi) against Survey No. " 561/4 " , for area " 0-0-50 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area " 0-20-60 " shall be substituted;
(xii) against Survey No. " 561/5 " , for area "0-2-50 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0-6-00 " shall be substituted;
(xiii) against Survey No. " 562 " , for area "0-10-90 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area " 0- 33-70" shall be substituted;
(xiv) against Survey No. " 563 " , for area "0-2-90 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0- 12-70 " shall be substituted;
(xv) against Survey No. " 541/1 " , for area " 0-1-60 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0-6-80 " shall be substituted;
(xvi) against Survey No. " 538 " , for area "0-13-50 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "0- 16-00" shall be substituted;
[No. L - 14014/10/2002-G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
4783
नई दिल्ली, 3 जुलाई, 2003
का. आ. 1844.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुंषगी ) द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती ह;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के या भूमि के भीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री डी. के. पारेख , सक्षम, कारी मुन्द्रा-भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन , गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी) , पो- बोक्स नं. 43 , यूनिट 2 , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मु. पो. खारी रोहर, तालुका गांधीधाम, गुजरात राज्य को लिखित में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
तहसीलः भचाऊ
जिला: - कच्छ
राज्य: - गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम
सुर्वे भैख्या
भाग यदी है तो
हेक्टर आग् सेन्टी आर 1
2
3
4
690
1. मोटी चीरइ
01
739
08
819
00
नाला
01
2. लुणवा
02
390/1 222/1
09
नाला
02
226
16
238/2
24
235/1
18
234
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
11
53 02 30 49 71 20 47 11 7, 26 97 4784
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14, 1925
2
1
233
२. लुगवा जामी
242/2
पैकी
182
106
3. चोपडवा
919/2
4.भचाऊ
930
पैकी
894
पैकी
891
889
887
833/1
832
पैकी
701/1
432/4
5. वोंध
432/5
423/1
402/1
368/1
पैकी
347
345/1
320/1
317/1
243/1
189/2
पैकी
ट्रार्वस 1421/1
131/1
6. वोधडा
304/2
7. विजपासर
20
5
88
245/2
245/3
258
पैकी 8. लखपत
207/1
पैकी
197
177/1
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
4
06
00
08
00
01
14
12
00 00
00
32
03
01
98
00
00 05
23
00 24
13
00 09
03
00
00
09
00
13
46
01
00
31 कार्ट ट्रेक
03
00
21
00
13
48
00
10
00
03
00
00
कार्ट ट्रेक
00
03
67
00
05
59
00
00
49
00
93
15
00
56
04
00
06
88
00
24
72
00
01
41
00
01
24
00
00
64
00
01
51
00
कार्ट ट्रेक
00
87
00
31
27
00
01
53
00 05
83
00
14
13
00
00
31
00
00
42
00
01
26
00
04
76
00
01
73
00
00
66
00
03
83
00
06
05 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4785
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
जिला:- कच्छ
तहसील:- भचाऊ
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सँख्या
राज्य:- गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदी है तो
1
2
41
869
9. अधोई
783/2
782/2
782/1
781/2
653
633
434/2
321/3
321/2
पैकी
295/1
983
10. शिवलखा
985
1014
1067/1
1105/3
1165/2
1172
1241/2
130
168/1
हेक्टर आर सेन्टी आर
4
3
18
00 00
09
94
00
16
00 22
20
15
00
76
00 18
41
81
00
97
04
00
72
00
01
00 08
97
20
00
04
00
87
00
31
07
00
82
00 03
नाला
11
00 06
02
01
00
01
48
00
02
16
00
00
31
00
00 01
33 नाला
00 04
19
32
00 02
00
86
00
07
खारी नदी
00
25
08
38
00
11 [फा. सं. आर-31015/3/2002- ओ.आर-II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 4786
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , 3rd July, 2003
S. O. 1844.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of crude oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab , through Mundra-Bathinda crude oil pipeline , a pipeline should be laid by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) ;
And whereas , it appears to the Central Goverriment that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user (ROU) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub - sation ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri D.K.Parekh, Competent Authority, Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline , Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindusan Petroleum Corporation Limited) , P.B.No. 43 , Unit 2, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , At and Post Khari Rohar , Taluka Gandhidham , State Gujarat .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4787
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़14, 1925
SCHEDULE
District : - Kutch
Taluka: - Bhachau
Survey No Name of Village
2
1
690
(1) . Moti Chirai
739
819
390/1
(2). Lunwa
222/1
226
238/2
235/1
234
233
242/2
182
P
106
(3). Chopadwa
919/2
(4) . Bhachau
930
P
894
P
891
889
887
833/1
832
P
701/1
432/4
(5) .Vondh
432/5
423/1
402/1
P
368/1
347
State : - Gujarat
ROU Area Part if Any
Ha. Ar. Sq.mt.
4
3
01 53
00
00 08 02
00 30
00
01 49
00
Nala
00 02 71
20
00 09
47
00 02
Nala
00 16 11
24 71
00
18 26
00
00 11 97
00 06 08
00 01
14
12
32
00 03
00 01 98
00 05 23
00 24 13
00 09 03
46
00 13
31
00 01
Cart Track
21
00 03
00 13 48
10
00 00
03 CartTrack
00 03 67
00 05 59
00 00 49
00 15 93
00 04 56
00 06 88 4788
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
Taluka - Bhachau
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
District:- Kutch
Name of Village Survey No 1
2
345/1
(5). Vondh
320/1
(Contd...)
317/1
243/1
189/2
Trowers 1421/1 P
131/1
304/2
(6) .Vondhada
20
(7) .Vijapasar
5
88
245/2
245/3
258
P
207/1
P (8 ) .Lakhpat
197
177/1
41
(9).Adhoi
869
783/2
782/2
782/1
781/2
653
633
434/2
321/3
321/2
295/1
P
983
(10) .Shivlakha
985
1014
1067/1
State : - Gujarat
ROU Area Part ifAny
Ha. Ar. Sq.mt. 3
4
00 24 72
00 01 41
00 01 24
00 00 64
00 01 51 Cart Track
00 00. 87
00 31 27
00 01 53
00 05 83
00 14 13
31
00 00 42
00
26
01
00 04 76
00 01 73
66
00 03 83
00 06 05
00 00 18
00 09 94
00 22 16
00 20 15
00 18 76
00 41 81
00 04 97
00 01 72
00 08 97
00 04 20
87
00 07
31
00
Nala
03 82
00 06 11
00 01 02
00 01 48
00 02 16 4789 भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Taluka : - Bhachau
District:- Kutch
State : - Gujarat
ROU Area Survey No
Name of Village
Part ifAny
Ha. Ar . Sq.mt.
2
4 1
3
00 00 31 1105/3
Nala
00 01 33 (10).Shivlakha (Contd ... )
1165/2
04
00
19
00
1172
02 32 1241/2
00 00 86
Khari River
00 07 25
130
00 08 38 168/1
11
[No. R- 31015/3/2002-O.R. -II ]
HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 3 जुलाई , 2003
का. आ. 1845.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में पानेवाडी (मनमाड) टर्मिनल से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इदौर) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
प्रतीत होता और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन आवश्यक है,
(भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है, कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 को उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री प्रहलाद वी. कचारे, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुम्बई - मनमाड पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना , भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड के कार्यालय , प्रथम तल, सेवा कॉम्पलेक्स, गुरुद्वारा के सामने , मुम्बई-आगरा रोड, धुले 424311 (महाराष्ट्र) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
1734 GI2003-13 4790
[PART II-SEC: 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14 , 1925
अनुसूची
तहसील-: अमलनेर
गट/ सर्वे नंबर ग्राम का नाम
34/1 अ 1. चोपडाई
41/ब
58
74
42भाग
52/1 भाग
23/2भाग 2. अंचलवाडी
259 3. जवखेडे
258
257
256
255
254
252
253
251
250
446 भाग 4.वावडे
270/1 -अ
272/ ब
437
52/1
415/3 भाग
433 भाग
47/3 5. लोणसीम
4714/
47/5
47/6 जिला-: जलगांव
राज्य-: महाराष्ट्र
क्षेत्र
आर
चौरसमीटर हैक्टर
00
0
18
74
0
16
80
0
01
0
72
09
09
36
0
03
37
0
43
12
0
03
16
0
42
03
0
01
0
26
01
50
0
62
01
0
62
0
01
62
01
0
24
0
03
01
26. 0
01
98
0
30
0
15
04
05
0
0
34
11
78
13
0
24
12
0
08
28
0
25
38
0
24
02
0
76
0
01
87
00
0
38
00
0 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4791 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14 , 1925
ग्राम का नाम
गट/ सर्वे नंबर
क्षेत्र
हैक्टर
आर
चौरस मीटर
0
05
40
6. लोणचारम
72/ भाग
0
45
90
160/ भाग
0
04
23
308/1अ
7. एकलहरे
0
04
308 /1 ब
23
8. एकतास
0
25
92
110/ भाग
141/3
0
9. भिलाली
12
24
[फा. सं. आर-31015/15/2001-ओ.आर-11 ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , 3rd July, 2003
S. O. 1845. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum products from the Panewadi ( Manmad ) terminal in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline to Manglya ( Indore) in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such extension pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person , interested in the land decribed in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Prahalad V. Kachare , Competent Authority, Mumbai -Manmad Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited af office at 1 Floor, Seva Complex, Opp. Gurudwara, Mumbai - Agra Road, Dhule 424311 (Maharashtra).
4792
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] !
SCHEDULE
State : Maharashtra
District : - Jalgaon
Tahsil : - Amalner
Name of Village
Area
Ares
Sq. Mts .
Hectors
Gat/ Survey Numbers
34/1 A 1. Chopdai
41/B
58
74.
42Pt .
52/1 Pt .
23/2 Pt. 2. Anchalwadi
259 3. Javkhede
258
257
256
255
254
252
253
251
250
446Pt.
270/1 -A 4. Wavade
272/B
437
52/1
415/3 Pt .
433 Pt.
47/3 5. Lonsim
47/4
47/5
47/6
00
18
0
74
16
0
80
01
0
72
09
σ
36
09
0
37
03
0
43
12
0
16
03
0
42
03
0
26
01
0
50
01
0
62
01
0
62
01
0
62
01
0
24
03
0
26
01
0
98
01
0
30
15
0
04
05
0
34
11
0
78
13
0
24
12
0
28
08
0
38
25
0
24
02
0
76
01
0
87
00
0
38
00
0 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4793 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अपाढ़ 14, 1925
Area
Name of Village Gat / Survey Numbers
Hectors
Ares
Sq. Mts .
6. Loncharam 72Pt.
0
05
40
160/Pt.
7. Eklabare
0
45
90
0
308/1 -A
04
23
308/1-B
0
04
23
8. Ektas
110/Pt.
0
25
92
9. Bhilali
141/3
0
12
24
[No. R- 31015/15/2001 -O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secу.
नई दिल्ली, 4 जुलाई, 2003
का. आ. 1846.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल टर्मिनल से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से, अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषगी) द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबध्द अनुसूची में वर्णित हैं, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार,, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबध्द है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथाप्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के भीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री डी. के. पारेख, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा - भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन, गुरू गोविंद सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) , पो. बॉ . नं. 43, यूनिट 2, एच.पी.सी.एल, मु. और पोस्ट खारी रोहर, तालुका गाँधीधाम, गुजरात राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 4794
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
अनुसूची
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]
जिला : बनामकांटा
नहमाल: डीसा
गन्य: गुजरान
क्षेत्रफल
'भाग यदि है तो
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सँख्या
2
3 1
60
( 1) कुपट
61
67/2
34
आग् मेन्टी आर हेक्टर
01
05
00
70
04
00
55
00
00
65
00
00
नकी कार्ट ट्रेक
(2) मालगढ
43/2
76
74/3
75/1
72/2
कार्ट ट्रेक
113/+ 1 +2 + 3 +4
02
01
00
00
12
34
54 00
01
82
01
00
96 00
00
30
00
00
32 00
01
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
115/1
59/3
पैकी (3) जोगपुरा
5/2
गामतल
152/3
152/2
152/1
26
पकी (4) कंसागे
87
86
327/1
पकी (5) थेग्वाडा
330/1
27/1
00
52
04
59 00
16
02 00
00
23 00
03
93
27
00
12
95 00
42 00
10
55 00
07
81 00
06
03
14 00
01
79 00
86 00
00
37 00
00
40 00
00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
27/2
40
00
00
पंकी - कार्ट ट्रेक
106
94/3
पैकी
94/3
00
96
00
20 00
19
00
07 00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
126
पैकी 00
00
55 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4795
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5 , 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
जिला: बनासकांठा
तहसील: डीसा
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सँख्या भाग यदि है तो
3 1
2
नाला
नाला (6) भाचरवा
60/2
65
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
55
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
54
पकी
49/2
301/1
(7) बुगल
कार्ट ट्रेक
226
239
243/2
237
पकी
कार्ट ट्रक
249
पैकी
250/3
250/2
63/1
61
56/2
51
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
1202
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक (8) मुडेटा
1116
1117
1118
कार्ट ट्रक
1162
पकी
1162
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
1189
पको
1188
पैकी - कार्ट ट्रेक
गज्य: गुजरात क्षेत्रफल
आर सेन्टी आर हेक्टर
4
00
00
66.
66 00
00
53 00
04
00
00
88
00
00
19 00
02
17 00
04
51
53 00
02
01
00
48 00
70
02
00
00
01
00
01
01
00
01
79 00
36
02
06
03
00
94 00
04
00
01
94
00
36 00
00
01
47
00
00
41
00
00
88
00
02 00
00
98
02
00
68
01
39 00
04
00
70
15
00
00
49 00
00
59 00
01
58 00
18
00 4796
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14 , 1925
नहमील: डीसा
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
जिला: बनासकांठा
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सँख्या
गज्य गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदि है तो
3 1
2
1182/1
आर
हेक्टर
सेन्टी आर
4
23 00
01
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
1392
1381
88 00
03
43 00
01
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
1362/2
1370
पैकी
57/3
पैकी (9) पालडी
45/2
44
42
पैकी
26
33 00
00
04
17 00
56 00
02
00
45
04
82 00
19
24
00
66
00
00
10
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
26
00
00
10
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
24/1
23/1
पैकी
21/3
21/3
00
24
11
96
12
00
55 00
17
01
80 00
पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक
19
55 00
00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
20
15/4
15/1
पैकी
15/5
14/7
34
पकी (10) ग्तनपुर (गजनीपुर)
23
00
55
18
00
08
24
05 00
01
00+
25
45 00
04
99 00
92
10
00
00
24
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
23
75 00
00
पैकी - कार्ट ट्रेक
18/1
224/2
पैकी (11) नई भीलडी
21/2
38/2
00
93
00
00
92
01
00
02
83 00
00
45
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
9/2
पैकी (12) सोयला
139
(13) गरनाल मोटी
119/3
00 00
01
00
04
90 00
49
12 4797
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
जिला: बनासकांठा तहमील: डीसा
गज्य ३ गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदि हैतो
सर्वे सँख्या
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
119/1
119/2
पैकी
108
83
79/1
79/2
पैकी
71
69/2
32/1
(14) खेटवा
34
पंकी
7
(15) सोनंत्रला
7
सेन्टी आर हेक्टर
आर
4
70
00
00
68
13
00
61
18
00
77
20
00
97
19.
00
56
09
00
41
00
00
87
00
00
31
03
00
12
13
00-
86
54
00
10 00
01
पंकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
5
पैकी
36/4
36/3
8
पैकी (16) डेडोल
3
पैकी
34/1/23
पैकी
34/1/19
पैकी
34/1/15
पैकी
34/1/17
95
पकी (17)लोग्वाडा
131
132
पैकी
134/1
133
70
00
00
85
01
00
18
00
00
31
06
00
16
09
00
11
02
00
82
02
00
17
01
00
00
01
00
29
01
00
45
05
00
86
26
00
34
02
00
90
00
00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
217
पैकी
168
(18) वडावल
पैकी
166
165/1
156
पैकी
पकी
150
कार्ट ट्रेक
88
पैकी (19) समशेरपुरा
पैकी
48+49
5271
93
01
00
58
07
00
79
00
00
20
68 00
52
03
00
59
01
00
63
01
00
12
20
00
01
46, 00
55
00
00
पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
57
1734GI2003-14
55
00
00 4798
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
तहमीन: डीसा
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
जिला: बनासकांठा
गाँव का नाम
गज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
सर्वे सँख्या
भाग यदि है तो
1
2
3
229/1
P (20) वाइवाडा
236/1
235
245
263/2
285/1
284
296/1
पकी
296/2
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
295/2
पकी
295/1
293
389
214
(21 )बिटोदर
169
पकी
144
पकी
121
आर
हक्टर
सेन्टी आर
4
56 00
09
00
03
62
18
05
00
76 00
10
00
14
81 00
12
19 00
13
02
00
09
37
10 00
01
32 00
01
00
04
67 00
33
72 00
49
00
00
07
89 00
00
93
00
66 00
02
73 00
[फा. सं. आर -31015/49/2001- ओ.आर-11
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , 4th July, 2003
S. O. 1846.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of crude oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab . through Mundra - Bathinda crude oil nineline, pipelines should be laid by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a suheidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited):
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipelines, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipelines are proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed to this notification
Now therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 19621 the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipelines under the land to Shri D.K. Parekh. Competent Authority. Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline , Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited), P.B.No.43 . Unit 2. HPCL . At & Post Khari Rohar , Taluka Gandhidham, State Gujarat .
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
SCHEDULE Taluka : Deesa
District : Banaskantha
4799 State: Gujarat ROU Area
PartifAny
Name of Village
Survey No.
2
3 1
P
60
(1) Kupat
P
61
67/2
34
Ar.
Ha.
Sq. Mt.
4
00
05
01
70 00
04
00
55 00
65 00
00
P -Cart Track
(2) Malgadh
43/2
P
76
74/3
75/1
72/2
P 00
02
01
00
12
34 00
54
01
01
00
82 00
96
00
CartTrack
113/+ 1+ 2+3 +4
30 00
00
00
P - Cart Track
P
115/1
59/3
P (3) Jorapura
5/2
01
32 00
04
52 00
16
59 00
00
02 00
03
23 00
27
93
Village Land
152/3
152/2
152/1
26
P (4) Kansari
87
P
86
327/1
P (5) Therwada
330/1
27/1
00
12
95 00
42
10
00
07
55 00
06
81 00
03
14 00
01
79 00
00
86 00
00
37
00
P - Cart Track
27/2
00
40 00
P - Cart Track
106
P
94/3
P
94/3
P - Cart Track
126
P
00
40 00
00
96 00
20
19
00
00
07 00
00
55 4800
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 5, 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
Taluka : Deesa
District : Banaskantha Name of Village
SurveyNo.
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] State: Gujarat
ROU Area
Part ifAny
1
2
3
Nala (6) Bhacharva
Nala
60/2
65
Ha.
Ar. Sq. Mt.
4
00
00
66 00
00
66 00
04
53
P - Cart Track
55
00
00
88
P-Cart Track
54
P
49/2
P (7) Bural
301/1
00
00
19 00
02
17 00
04
51 00
02
53
Cart Track
226
239
243/2
237
P 00
01
48 00
02
70 00
01
00 00
01
01 00
01
79
Cart Track
249
P
250/3
250/2
63/1
61
56/2
51
00
02
36 00
03
06 00
04
94 00
01
94 00
00
36 00
01
47 00
00
41 00
P - Cart Track
(8)Mudetha
1202 .
00
88
P - Cart Track
1116
1117
1118
00
00
02 00
98
02
00
01
68 00
04
39
CartTrack
1162
P
1162
00
15
70 00
00
49
P - Cart Track
1189
P
1188
00
00
59 00
01
58 00
P - Cart Track
00
18 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अधाढ़ 14, 1925
Taluka: Deesa
District: Banaskantha
SurveyNo.
Name of Village
State: Gujarat
ROU Area
Part ifAny
1
2
3
1182/1
Ha.
Ar. Sq.Mr.
4
00
23
01
P-Cart Track
1392
1381
00
03
88
P-Cart Track
1362/2
1370
P
57/3
P (9) Paldi
45/2
44
42
P
26
00
01
43
00
00
33 00
17
04
00
02
56 00
45
04
00
19
82 00
24
66 00
P- Cart . Track
26
00
10
P - Cart Track
24/1
23/1
P
21/3
21/3
00
00
10 00
24
11
00
12
96 00
17
55
P - Cart Track
19
00
01
80 00
P - Cart Track
20
15/4
P
15/1
15/5
14/7
34
P (10) Ratanpur (Gajanipur)
23
00
55 00
18
55 00
08
24 00
01
05
25
00
45 00
04
99 00
92
10
00
00
P - Cart Track
23
24
P - Cart Track
18/1
224/2
P ( 11) New Bhildi
21/2
38/2
00
75
00
00
00
93 00
01
92 00
02
83
P - Cart Track
9/2
P (12) Soyla
139
(13 ) Garnal Moti
119/3
00
00
45 00
00
01
00
04
90
12
00
49 4802
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
Taluka : Deesa
District : Banaskantha Name of Village
SurveyNo.
[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ) State: Gujarat
ROU Àrea
Part ifAny
1
2
3
119/1
119/2
108
P
83
79/1
79/2
71
P
69/2
32/1
(14) Khetwa
34
7
P (15) Sotambla
7
Ha.
Аг . Sq.Mt.
4
00
00
70 00
13
68 00
18
61 00
20
77 00
97
19
00
09
56
-00
41 00
00
87
00
00
03
31 00
13
12 00
54
86
Cart Track
5
P
36/4
36/3
P
8
(16) Dedol
3
P
34/1/23
34/1/19
P
34/1/15
P
34/1/17
P
95
P (17) Lorwada
131
132
P
134/1
133
00
01
10 00
00
70 00
01
85 00
00
18 00
06
31 00
09
16 00
02
11 00
02
82 00
01
17 00
01
00 00
29
01
00
05
45 00
86
26
00
34
02
P- Cart Track
217
P
168
(18) Vadawal
166
P
165/1
156
P
P
150
00
.00
90 00
01
93 00
07
58 00
00
79 00
20
68 00
03
52 00
59
01
01
00
63
CartTrack
88
P ( 19 ) Shamsherpura
48+49
P
52/1
20
00
12 00
01
46
00
55 00
P-Cart Track
57
00
00
55
P - Cart Track
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4803
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
Taluka : Deesa
District : Banaskantha
Name of Village
SurveyNo.
Part ifAny 1
2
3
229/1
P (20) Baiwada
236/1
P
235
245
P
263/2
285/1
284
296/1
P
296/2
P - Cart Track
295/2
P
295/1
293
P
389
214
(21) Vithodar
169
P
144
P
121
P State: Gujarat
ROU Area
Ar.
Ha.
Sq. Mt.
4
00
09
56
62 00
03
00
05
18 00
10
76 00
14
81 00
12
19 00
02
13 00
37
09
00
01
10 00.
32
01
00
67
04
00
33
72 00
00
49
07
00
89 00
93
00
00
66 00
00
02
73 [No. R-31015/49/2001 -O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 4 जुलाई, 2003
का. आ. 1847.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल टर्मिनल से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिमटेड की समनुषगी) द्वारा पाइपलाइनें बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबध्द अनुसूची में वर्णित हैं , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबध्द है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथाप्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के भीतर पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के संबंध में श्री डी. के. पारेख , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा-भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन, गुरु गोविंद सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी) , पो.बॉ. नं. 43, यूनिट 2, एच.पी.सी.एल, मु. और पोस्ट खारी रोहर, तालुका गाँधीधाम, गुजरात राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 4804
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
अनुसूची तहसील: कांकरेज
जिला: बनासकांठा गाँव कानाम
सर्वे सँख्या
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]
राज्य: गुजरात क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदि है तो
1
2
3
387
पैकी (1) मांडला
408
399/1
पैकी
82
(2) जाखेल
215/2
हेक्टर
आर सेन्टी आर
4
86
04
00
02
67 00
00
00
68 00
01
09
00 00
01
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
(3)शिरवाडा
214
00
02
84
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
211
पैकी
211
00
01
00
00
01
07
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
267/2
270/2
557/1
654/1
650
पैकी
111
(4) चांगा
312
पैकी
290
313
पैकी
323
पैकी
324
पैकी
329
330
67
पैकी (5) अधगाम
66
60/2
57/1
00
00
21 00
01
47
54
13
00
00
57
01
04
80 00
00
01
00 00
43
18
00
16
10 00
32
06 00
09
70 00
01
44 00
23
00 00
16
96
01
00
40
02
00
44 00
12
56 00
00
02
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
131/1
पैकी
127
202/1
पैकी 00
01
00 00
02
32 00
13
00 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4805
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
अनुसूची
जिला: बनासकांठा
तहसील: कांकरेज
राज्य: गुजरात क्षेत्रफल
भाग यदि है तो
सर्वे सँख्या
गाँवका नाम
3
2
1
25
(6) कुडवा
46/1
सेन्टी आर
आर
हेक्टर
4
29
00
00
38
00
00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
(7)विभानेसडा
12/2
50 00
01
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
31
पैकी
कार्ट ट्रेक (8) राजपुर
141/3
पैकी
141/3
04 00
01
08
36 00
97
02
00
01
10 00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
141/4
पैकी
172
(9)काकर
174
193
188
99 00
28
02
02
00
48 00
03
22 00
00
80
00
00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
187
74 00
00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
कार्ट ट्रेक
161
229
00
00
40
63 00
00
88
00
00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
233
265
277
280/2
133
पैकी (10) नेकोइ
131
पैकी
212
00
91
01
74 00
01
52
02
00
00
08 00
02
65 00
09
45 00
00
00
16
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
(11) पादरडी
212
पैकी
213
पैकी
213
36
36 00
27 00
03
00
26 00
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
214
पैकी
217/1
पैकी
217/1
81 00
00
79 00
09
58 00
01
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
264/2
पैकी 1734GI2003-15
00
61 00 4806
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA14, 1925
अनुसूची तहसील : कांकरेज
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
जिला बनासकांठा
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सँख्या
राज्य : गुजरात
भाग यदि है तो
1
2
3
261
पैकी
257/1
258/3
36
पैकी
35
पैकी
30
पकी
30
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टर
आर सेन्टी आर
4
00
00
16 00
02
20
00
00
27 00
05
44 00
02
95
00
00
59 00
00
10
पेको- कार्ट ट्रेक
32
195/2
(12) चिमनगढ
190/3
189/1
179/1
00
00
14 00
02
33 00
01
69 00
06
13 00
00
50
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
178/1
178/2
112
पैकी
108/2
पैकी
108/2
00
00
21
00
04
93 00
12
00 00
00
40 00
01
48
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
109
99
( 13 ) ग्तनगढ
पैकी
103
18
(14) ग्वियाणा
पैकी
28
32
42
65
पैकी
64
89
पैकी
115
(15)खोडा
34/2
00
90
04
00
02
40
07
00
06 00
06
23
00
00
46 00
76
01
00
00
62 00
00
65 00
04
62
00
00
72 00
06
06 00
00
31
00
00
73 4807 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
अनुसूची
तहसील कांकरेज
जिला बनासकांठा
राज्य: गुजरात गाँव का नाम
सर्वेसँख्या
भाग यदि है तो
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टर
आर सेन्टी आर 1
2
3.
4
34/1
00
46
02
32
00
00
29
पैकी- कार्ट ट्रेक
16
00
00
05 (16) ग्त्रींमाणा
67
00
00
77
00
00
66
53
पैकी
00
01
32
कार्ट ट्रेक
87/2
00
01
19
290/2
00
01
84
289
00
00
10
279
00
10
पैकी - कार्ट ट्रेक
330/1
00
67
02
[फा. सं. आर-31015/4/2002- ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , 4th July, 2003
S. O. 1847.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of crude oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujaratto Bathinda in the State of Punjab , through Mundra-Bathinda crude oil pipeline , pipelines should be laid by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited);
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipelines, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipelines are proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipelines under the land to Shri D.K.Parekh, Competent Authority, Mundra- Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline, Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) , P.B.No.43 , Unit 2, HPCL. At & Post Khari Rohar , Taluka Gandhidham, State Gujarat .
4808
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
SCHEDULE
District : Banaskantha
Taluka : Kankrej
Part ifAny
Survey No.
Name of Village
3
2
1
P
387
( 1 ) Mandala
408
P
399/1
82
(2) Jakhel
215/2
P - Cart Track (3 ) Sirwada
P- Cart Track
214
P
211
P-Cart Track
211
267/2
270/2
557/1
654/1
650
P
111
14 , Changa
P
312
290
P
313
323
P
P
324
329
330
P
67
(S ) Adhgam
66
60/2
57/1
P - Cart Track
P
131/1
127
202/1
P
25
(6) Kundva
P - Cart Track
46/1
Vibhanesda
P - Cart Track
12/2
P
31
CartTrack (8) Rajpur
P
141/3
P - Cart Track
141/3
P
141/4
State : Gujarat ROU Area
Ar.
Ha .
Sq. Mt.
4
86 00
04
67
02
00
68
00
00
01
09 00
00 00
01
84
02
00
00
01 00
07 00
01
21
00
00
47
01
00
13
54 00
57
01
00
80
04
00
00
01
00
43
18
00
00
16
10
06
32
00
09
70 00
44 00
01
00
23
00
96
16
00
00
40 00
02
44
56 00
12
02 '00
00
00 00
01
32 00
02
00
13 00
29
00
00
38
00
00
Gi
50 00
04
Gi
00
36 00
08
97 00
02
10
01
00
99 00
28 4809 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5 , 2003/अषाढ़ 14, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
SCHEDULE
District : Banaskantha
State: Gujarat Taluka : Kankrej
ROU Area
Part ifAny
Survey No.
Name of Village
Ar.
Ha .
Sq. Mt.
4
2
3
1
02
02
00
172
(9) Kakar
48
03
00
174
00
22
00
193
80
00
00
P - Cart Track
188
74
00
00
P - Cart Track
187
40
00
00
CartTrack
63
00
00
161
88
00
00
P- Cart Track
229
91
00
01
233
74
01
00
265
52
02
00
277
08
00
00
280/2
65
02
00
P
133
(10)Nekoi
45
09
00
P
131
16
00
00
P- Cart Track
212
(11) Padardi
36
36
00
P
212
27
03
00
P
213
26
00
00
P - Cart Track
213
81
00
00
P
214
79
09
00
P
217/1
58
01
00
P- Cart Track
217/1
61
00
00
P
264/2
16
00
00
P
261
20
02
00
257/1
27
00
00
258/3
44
05
00
P
36
95
02
00
P
35
59
00
00
P
30
10
00
00
P-Cart Track
30
00
14
00
32
33
02
00
195/2
(12) Chimangach
69
01
00
190/3
13
06
00
189/1
50
00
00
P- Cart Track
179/1
21
00
00
178/1
93
04
00
178/2
00
12
00
P
112 4810
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
SCHEDULE
District : Banaskantha
Taluka : Kankrej
State: Gujarat ROU Area
PartifAny
SurveyNo.
Name of Village
2
3 1
P
108/2
Ar.
Ha.
Sq.Mt.
4
00
40 00
48
01
00
P- CartTrack
108/2
109
P
99
(13) Ratangadh
103
P
18
(14) Raviyana
28
32
42
P
65
64
P
89
115
1 (15) Khoda
34/2
34/1
90
04
00
40
02
00
06
07
00
23
06
00
46
00
00
76
01
00
62
00
00
65
00
00
62
04
00
72
00
00
06
06
00
31
00
00
73
00
00
46
02
00
29
00
00
P- Cart Track
32
16
(16) Khimana
67
P
66
05
00
00
77 00
00
53
00
00
01
32 00
Cart Track
87/2
290/2
289
19
01
00
84
01
00
10
00
00
10
01
00
P- Cart Track
279
330/1
67
02
00
[No. R-31015/4/2002-O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4811 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़ 14, 1925
श्रम मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 6 जून , 2003
management of Industry colliery of Kusunda Area VI of M/ s , BCC Ltd. is correct and justified? If so, whether the demand of regularisation of these workmen by the union is legal and justified? And if so, towhat relief are these workmen entitled ? " का. आ. 1848.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा०को०को ०लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण I, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 124/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/152/95- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]
एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF LABOUR
New Delhi , the 6th June, 2003
2. It appears from the record that right from 11-4-2002 none has been appearing in this case on behalf ofthe workmen and only adjournment after adjournment was granted to enable the workmen to file documents on their behalf. It further appears that on the last dated i.e. 4-3-2003 after noticing the past development again one adjournment was granted for appearing and taking necessary steps on behalf of the workmen and further specifically and categorically it was observed in the order passed on that date that if on the next date also the position would remain the same then some necessary and appropriate order would be passed.
S.O. 1848. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 124/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 5-6-2003 .
[No. L- 20012/ 152/95 - IR(C- 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
Astoday ( 19-5-2003 ) again the position remains the same, it is needless to grant any further adjournment for any purpose whatsoever . It is high time that some necessary and appropriated order is passed regarding final disposalofthis reference . When the workmen or the union who were stated to be aggrieved by an action of the management are themselves no more interested in pursuing . thedispute or the present case , it would be sheer wastage oftirne to allowthis case remain pending for any longer .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I , DHANBAD
Thus , in view of all the aforesaid , this reference stands finally disposed of.
Inthe matter of a reference U/ S . 10( 1)( d)( 2A) of 1. D.Act , 1947
S.H. KAZMI , Presiding Officer Reference No. 124 of 1997.
नई दिल्ली, 6 जून, 2003
Parties Employers in relation to the management of industry Colliery of M/ s . B.C.C Ltd ..
AND
Their Workmen
:
Present
Shri S. H. Kazmi , Presiding
Officer
Appearances : Forthe Employers
: Shri D. K. Verma,
का. आ. 1849.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ.सी.आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चंडीगढ़ ( संदर्भ संख्या 38/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Advocate
For the Workmen
: None .
[सं. एल-22012/297/99-आई.आर. (सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी State : Jharkhand
: Industry : Coal
Dated , the 19th May, 2003
New Delhi , the 6th June , 2003
AWARD
By order No. L-2001-2/ 152/ 95 -I.R. ( C - I) dated the 3rd June , 1997 , the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :
S.O. 1849.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 38/2000 ) of the Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 5-6-2003 .
[No. L -22012/297/99- IR(C- II ) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer "Whether the claim of the Union that Shri Shankar Yadav and 51 others (as per list enclosed) were engaged as coal loaders for truck loadingjob by the [PART IISEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4812
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ASADHA 14 , 1925
ANNEXURE
New Delhi , the 6th June, 2003
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL- TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH
: Shri S. M. Goel
PresidingOfficer
Case No. ID 38/2000
Pala Ram son of Lehna Singh Village & P.O. Kheri Naru ,
District Karnal .
S.O. 1850.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 149/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 05-06-2003.
Applicant
Versus
[No. L- 220 12/ 166/2001 - IR(C- II) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer Food Corporation of India , District Manager , Karnal
Respondent
ANNEXURE
APPEARANCES
:None
For the workmen
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT
:Shri Pramod Jain
For the Management
LUCKNOW
PRESENT
AWARD
SHRIKANT SHUKLA
(Passed on 6th ofMay, 2003 )
PRESIDING OFFICER
I.D. NO.149/2002
Ref. No.. L- 22012/ 166/2001 - IR( CM- II) dated 27-8-2002 The Central Govt . vide no . L-22012 /297/99 / IR (CM- II ) dated 27th of January , 2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication ;
Between
The State Secretary, Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karmchari Sangh, 5-6 , Habibullah Estate , Hazratganj , Lucknow (Espousing cause of Sri Laxman )
AND
"Whether the action of the management of FCI in not regularisaing the services of workmen Shri Pala Ram and 13 others engaged under contract Labour ( R & A ) Act, 1970 in FCI after the notification No. 779 (E) dated 9-12-1976 came into operation is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?"
The Sr. Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India,
5-6,Habibullah Estate, Hazratganj , Lucknow
AWARD
2. Today the case was fixed for filing of claim statement . None has put up appearance on behalf of the workman despite many notices . Nor any claim statement has been filed. It appears that workman is not interestedto pursue with the present reference .
Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide their order No.L - 22012/ 1o.L - 22012 / 166/2001 - IR(CM - II ) dated 27-8-2002 referred the dispute of Laxman for adjudication on following issues;
In view of the above , the present reference is dismissed in default and returned to the Central Govt . as such . Central Govt. be informed.
Chandigarh.
6-5-2003
S. M. GOEL, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 जून , 2003
"WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, LUCKNOW IN NOT CORRECTING THE DATE OF BIRTH OF SH . LAXMAN AS 4-12-1943 IN THE RELEVANT RECORDS AND RETIRING ACCORDINGLY IS LEGAL AND JUSTIFIED? IF NOT TO WHAT RELIEF THE WORKMAN IS ENTITLED? "
का. आ. 1850.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ.सी.आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, लखनऊ ( संदर्भ संख्या 149/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
The reference above discloses that the worker Laxman has retired but the workman demanded the correction of date of birth but FCI did not accede to the demand of the workman accordingly the dispute was referred whether the action of the management in not correcting the date of birth of Sri Laxman 4-12-1943 in relevant records is legal and justified. The notices were issued to the Secretary, Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karmchari Sangh, Lucknow and Sr.Regional Manager , FCI , Lucknow.
[सं. एल-22012/166/2001- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4813
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़ 14, 1925
The workman representative i.e. Secretary, Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karmchari Sangh, Lucknow did not file any statement of claim to the effect that recording of date of birth in the relevant records was wrong and that needed correction. Although notices were issued to file the statement of claim by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and by thisTribunal.
The worker representative Sri T. B. Singh appeared and moved the application for adjournment and accordingly 8.5.2003 date is fixed for filing of statement of claim . Today Sri T. B. Singh A/R of the worker appears and inform to the court that Laxman has expired. In the circumstances the person who claims that his date of birth haswrongly entered in the record of service has not turned up to say so . In the circumstances the issue referred can not be answered that the management acted illegally in not correcting the record , therefore the workman Sri Laxman is not entitled to any relief. Lucknow
8-5-2003
SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 जून, 2003
का. आ. 1851.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्दीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जयपुर, ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./एल.सी/आर/239/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ सं. एल -22012/576/96- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 6th June , 2003
S.O. 1851. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R /239/ 98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman, whichwas received by the Central Government on 5-6-2003. [No. L-22012/576/96- IR( C- II )]
N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT NDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT JABALPUR PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI R.K. DUBEY CASE No. CGIT/ LC/R/239/98
Shri Ramiyawan Gautam , S/o Firrai ,
President,
Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Dalit Mazdoor Sangh , Nandan Mine No.2 , Mines Qr . No. 18, P.O. Nandan Teh . Junnardeo , Distt. Chhindwara
...Applicant/ Ist party 1734GI2003-16
Versus
TheManager,
NandanMineNo. 2,
WCL , Kanhan Area,
P.O. Nandan,
Distt. Chhindwara (MP) .
Non-applicant/IInd party
AWARD
Passed on this 26th day of May, 2003.
1.The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide No. L- 22012/576/96 /IR ( CM.II) dated 30-10-98 has referred thefollowing dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :
"Whether the action of the Manager, Nandan Mine No. 2 , P.O. Nandan, WCL, Distt . Chhindwara (MP). In dismissing Shri Rarmjiyawan Gautam S/ o Fiffai, Mining Sirdar, Token No. 905 of Nandan Mine No. 2 ofWCL, Kanhan Area from services w.e.f. 5-5-96 is justified? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to?"
2. During the pendency of the case , the management filed an application for passing award in terms ofsettlement Memorandum of settlement is also attached with their application . The application was signed by the workaan Ramjiyawan Gautam and his representative and onbehalfofthe management Shri S.K.Puri , PM(SB/L) , IR Deptt. WCL Hq, Nagpur, Shri G.R.Dalne, MP, Want North Area and Shri S.Kerketta , PM Nandan SA Kanhan . Two attestingwitnesses signature are also in this memorandum. Notice were issued to the workman to present in the court butafter the service ofthe notice, workman remained absent. It seems that the workman is fully willing to accept the settlement . Therefore the memorandum of settlement producedby the management is accepted and it is ordered:
I. That the workman's date of appointment i.e. 13-10-1973 as Loader and date of coming in T&S Grade C as Mining Sirdar will remain unchanged.
2. That basic pay which the workman was drawing onthe date ofdismissal (5-5-96) will be restored onthedate ofre-employment (25-12-1997) 3. That the workman will be entitled for monetary benefit arising out of pay fixation under NCWA - V and VI from the date of submission of Settlement before CGIT , Jabalpur for consent Award .
4. That employ who arejunior to him and already promoted to T& S Gr . B will not be affected/ disturbed on restoring Workman's date of coming in T& SGr.C.
5. That period of idleness from date of termination to the date ofjoining his duties will be treated as Dies - non on the principle of " No work No Pay" and will be granted benefit of continuity ofservice for limited purpose of gratuity, 4814
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
10th May, 2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :
6. That this settlement will full and final settlement ofthe dispute between the parties and no other claims/benefit whatsoever shall be claimed by any one in respect of it .
3. Due to the settlement filed by both the parties, no answer is neccessary for the reference in question .
4. Copy of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour as per rules .
"Whether the action of the management of the Secretary for Society for Creation of Heaven on Earth, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Vill. Tepla, Post office Saha, District Ambala, Haryana in terminating the service of Sh . Ranbir Singh , ' Tractor Driver w.e.f, 15-7-2000 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ?"
R. K. DUBEY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 जून, 2003
2. The workman made a statement that he withdraw the present reference . In view of this statement, no dispute award is returned in the present case to the Ministry. Central Govt. be informed.
Chandigarh Dated29thApril, 2003
S.M. GOEL, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 जून , 2003
का. आ. 1852.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी. एच. ई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्दीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ ( संदर्भ संख्या 99/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-42012/114/2001- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 6th June , 2003
का. आ. 1853.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ. सी. आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्दीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जयपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी. 48/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/ 17/2001- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 6th June , 2003 S.O.1852 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 99/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Society for Creation of Heaven on Earth and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 05-06-2003 .
[No. L-42012/ 114 /2001 - IR(C- II)] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH
S.O.1853. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.CGIT- 48/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Jaipur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 5-6-2003 .
:SHRI S. M. GOEL
Case No. ID 99 /2k2
[No. L-22012/ 17/2001 - IR(C - II) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
PRESIDING OFFICER Sh . Ranbir Singh S/ o Sh . Patia Ram C/ o Sh . Shanti Parkash , H.No. 1400 , Sardar Bazar ,
Karnal.
CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR
...Applicant.
Case No. CGIT -48/2001 .
V/s
The Secretary, Society for Creation of Heaven on Earth , Vill .Tepla, P.O. Saha, Distt. Ambala (Hry.)
...Respondent .
REPRESENTATIVES
Reference No. L- 22012/17/2001 - IR (CM - II) Sh. Dhanraj S/o Sh . Harikishan Sargara, R/o Rathori Kua, Nagaur(Raj .)-341001 .
For the workman
:Workman in person
Versus
: Sh . K.N. Chaudhary .
Forthe management
AWARD
1. Regional Manager ,
(Passed on 29th April, 2003 )
Food Corporation of India , 4, Nehru Place, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
The Central Govt . Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L- 42012/ 114 /2001 / IR ( CM - II ) dated 4815 भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़ 14, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2.Assistant Manager (Depot) ,
FoodCorporation of India, Food Storage Depot, Nagaur(Raj)
PRESENT:
PresidingOfficer: Sh . R.C. Sharma.
: Sh . Subodh Shah .
Forthe applicant
For the non-applicants : Sh . Kanta Prasad Sharma .
under which the service of the workman was provided by the Samiti to the non - applicant management is effective since 1-4-97 which was signed on by the parties on 21-5-97 . The non - applicants have denied that the workman was ever paid by them , but according to their averments the consolidated amount was paid to the Samiti in accordance with the agreement . According to them, the workman had performed his duty till 6-3-99 as per the terms ofthe agreement, who was withdrawn by the Samiti itself.
: 24-04-2003 .
Date ofaward
AWARD
4. In the rejoinder , the workman has denied that he ever worked under the terms of a contract with the non- applicant management .
5. On the pleadings of both the parties , the following issues were framed:-
1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause D of Sub- section 1 and Sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under:
(1) Whether the applicant workman was appointed on the permanent post ofSecurity Guard in the month of May, 1997 on the payment of the salary worth Rs. 1550 p.m. who has worked by 6th of March, 1999 in the Department of the non- applicants ?
Burden on applicant.
"Whether the action of the management of FCT, Nagaur in terminating the services of Sh . Dhanraj S/o Sh . Harkishan Sargara w.e.f. 7-3-1999 is legal andjustified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
(2) Whether the applicant workman has been illegally terminated on 7.3.1999 by an oral order ofthe non-applicant department ?
Burdenon applicant.
(3) Whether at the time of the termination of the applicant workman , the workmen junior to him were working in the non - applicant department and his termination is in violation of the provisions under Section 25(G) of the Act ?
Burden on applicant.
(4) Whether after the termination of the applicant, the newworkmen have been recruited by the Department in violation of the provisions under Section 25 (H) of the Act?
Burden on applicant.
(5)Whether the applicant workman is entitled for the reinstatement from the date of his termination with all the back -wages and consequential relief admissible to him?
Burden on applicant.
(6) Relief.
2. In furtherance of the reference , the workman has submitted his claim wherein he has averred that he was initially appointed with the non - applicant management in the month ofMay , 1997 on the vacant post of the Security Guard on the salary ofRs . 1550 p.m. He has stated that he hadnever been a member of the Fawji Rakshak Seva Samiti , Nagaur (for short Samiti ), that he had worked with the non- applicant management and he was paid by the non- applicant management . But his service was orally terminated w.e.f. 7-3-99 without giving him any notice and the compensation amount. He raised the dispute before the Conciliation Officer , Govt. of India at Jaipur , who subsequently submitted the failure report to the Central Govt. Theworkman has pleaded that the junior employees to him are still working with the non -applicant management and thus , the non - applicant management has violated the provision under Section 25 -G ofthe Act, that he had himself completed 240 days in the preceding calendar year, whose service has been terminated in violation of the provision under Section 25 - F of the Act . He has further averred that after the termination of the service , the management has recruited the new employees and has thereby violated the provision under Section 25 - H of the Act . He has prayed thathe be reinstated in the service with other consequential benefits .
6. In the evidence , the workman has filed his own affidavit and on behalf of the non - applicant, the affidavit ofMW- 1 , Sh. Hari Singh Meratia, Assistant Manager, F.C.I and MW- 2 , Shi Devi Singh, Secretary of the Samiti have been filed. The supplementary affidavit of MW- 2, Sh. Devi Singh was also submitted.
7. No document has been produced on behalf of the workman. In the rebuttal of the claim , 21 documents have beenplaced on the record, out of them , Ex . A- l to A- 7 have beenbrought on the record by MW-1 , whereas Ex . A- 8 to A-29 have been placed by the witness MW- 2, Sh . Devi Singh.
3.Antagonizing the claim , the non -applicants in their commonwritten statement have denied the facts as alleged by the workman and have pleaded that the workman was never appointed by the management as Security Guard, but he was sent to them through the Samiti for performing thejob of Security Guard, that the said Samiti registered one, that there was no relationship of employer and employee between the parties and that the said agreement 4816
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
8. I have heard both the parties and have gone through the record . The issue- wise discussion follows as under:-
ISSUES NO . 1 & 2
the same to the workman , that no service record of the workman was prepared by the non - applicant management since he was not appointed by it . He further contends that the service of the workman was not terminated by the management , but he was withdrawn by the Samiti itself.
9. Since the points involved in both these issues are identical , these are being discussed under same title .
13. I have bestowed my anxious consideration to the rival contentions and have perused the judicial pronouncements referred to by both the parties.
14. The Ld. representative for the workman in support ofhis contentions have referred to the following decisions which are discussed hereunder:-
2001 Lab I. C , Jharkhand H. C. 3273 :
15. In this case , the workmen were performing their duties with the management who had taken the specific plea that they have been engaged by the management for performing various perennial nature of jobs since 1989 , who worked under direct control and supervision of the Manager and other officials of the management for which management also provided instruments and tools of work inthe colliery where their attendance were marked . Their claim was allowed.
1978 Lab I. C. Supreme Court 1264:
16. The facts of this case are that the workers were required to produce goods for the business of the employer, who had the economic control over the workers skill and continued their employment . It was held that the presence ofintermediate contractors is of no consequence when on lifting the veil or looking at the conspectus of factors governing the employment , it was found that the real employer is the management , not the intermediate contractor.
2000 (87) FLR S.C. 7 :
17. In this case, there were about 170 employees working in the cafeterias in the university, who claimed their regularization of the services as regular employees of theuniversitywhich was declined by the university. Their claims were accepted by the Court .
18. In the light of the facts of the referred cases enumerated supra, it is to be adjudicated as to whether the facts emerging out in the present case are identical with the facts of the referred cases or not ?
10. The Ld. Representative for the workman has strenuously argued that the workman had worked with the non -applicant establishment since 1.5.97 to 6.3.99 . who was not served with a notice prior to his termination order and when he requested the employer to regularize his service, his service was terminated. His next contention is that the non- applicant has stated in his written statement that the workman signed in the attendance register maintained by the non - applicant and he has drawn his salary from the non- applicant management , but according to his submission , the attendance register could not be submitted by the non - applicants despite the instruction of the Tribunal . He further contends that the period of work performed by the workman with the non - applicant management is not disputed, but the dispute is confined only to the fact of the relationship ofthe employer and the employee between the parties . According to the contention of the Ld . Representative for the workman , the non- applicants had directly appointed the workman , whereas it has been shown on behalfof the non - applicant management that the workman was provided to the management by the Samiti through a contract. The Ld. Representative has also assailed the contract Ex . A - l1 submitted by the non- applicants on the grounds that it was executed w.e.f. 1.4.97 butwas signed on 21.5.97, which shows that the workman wasdirectly appointed by the non- applicant management w.e.f. 1.4.97. His another ground of attack is that the agreement was executed only for one year , whereas the workman performed his work since 1.5.97 to 6.3.99 . He has also challenged the appointment letter Ex . A- 7, which is said to have been issued by the Samiti on the ground that vide this order, the workman was appointed w.e.f. 16.5.97 , whereas he worked with the non - applicant management w.e.f. 1.5.97. On these grounds , the Ld . Representative submits that both these documents are not proved and which have been prepared at a later stage of the dispute.
11. The Ld . representative for the workman has also assailed the testimony of MW - 1 , Sh . Hari Singh and MW- 2, Sh . Devi Singh on the ground that they are not the reliable witnesses .
19. The controversy involved in the instant dispute isthat it has been alleged on behalf of the workman that he was directly appointed as the Security Guard ny the non- applicant management and the relationship of employer and employee does exist between the parties . On the other hand, the non - applicant management has tried to show that the workman was not directly appointed by it, rather hewas provided as a Security Guard by the Samiti on the basis of the agreement Ex. A - l entered into by both the parties .
20. It is evident that the workman could not be able to produce any documentary evidence in support of his version that he was directly appointed by the non -applicant 12. Arguing contra , the Ld . representative for the non - applicants submits that the workman was never appointed by the non - applicant management as Security Guard , he was provided by the Samiti as a Security Guard through the contract Ex . A- 1 , the duty charts were maintained by the non - applicant management to verify the attendance of the Security Guard , that the workman was never paid by the non - applicants , but the consolidated amount was paid to the contractor , who used to disburse भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़ 14, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
management . In his cross - examination , he has disclosed that after getting the salary from the non-applicant management , he used to sign in the salary register which wasmaintained by the non - applicant management and that hewas never paid his salary by the Samiti . The sole ground ofthe direct supervision ofthe non - applicant management over the workman , as disclosed in his cross - examination is that the Manager used to assign the job to him .
21. Contrary to the evidence led by the workman , MW- 1 . Sh . Hari Singh Meratia, Assistant Manager of the non -applicant management has proved the agreement Ex. A- l and has stated that the workman was provided as a SecurityGuardby the Samiti through the agreement Ex . A- 1. The registration of the Samiti Ex . A-2 has also been proved and it has been denied that the workman was directly paid by the non - applicant management .
22. Ex. A- l is an agreement entered into by both the parties which had been executed on 21-5-97 w.e.f. 1-4-97 for entrusting the security matters to the Samiti and whereby the Samiti agreed upon to depute the Security Guards to the non - applicant management for security of food storage depots which have been exhibited in the agreement itself. The rates of the emoluments admissible to the security staff are also described and it has been clearly stated that the pay and allowances of these personnel will be paid by the management to the Samiti for disbursement to the security personnel .
23. Ex. A-2 is the registration certificate in favour of the Samiti za Ex. -3 is a duty chart prepared by the management , which was sent to the higher authorities for approval and thereafter the payment was made over to the Samiti for disbursement to the Security Guards . The watchmen register was also maintained by the non - applicant management , wherein the attendance of the departmental Security Guards as well as the Guards provided by the Samiti was marked. The management has also adduced Ex . A-4, the sanction of the competent authority for engaging the Security Guards for the month of November , 1998. Ex . A-7 is the appointment letter dated 16-5-97 issued by the Samiti appointing the workman as Security Guard , a copy of it has been endorsed to the Manager, F.C.I. , Nagaur as an intimation for providing a Security Guard to the non- applicant management .
24. MW-2 , Sh . Devi Singh, Secretary if the Samiti has corroborated the deposition of Sh . Hari Singh Meratia and has proved the agreement Ex. A- 1 and the registration certificate Ex . A- 2 . He has further stated that the appointment order in favour of the workman Ex . A - 7 was issued by the Samiti and he was paid by the Samiti . The payment receipts Ex . A- 8 to Ex . A- 29 have been adduced by him on the record and which have been proved. These receipts are issued on the printed proforma of the Samiti and have been signed by the workman respectively . All these factors prove that the workman was not directly appointed by the non - applicant management , but he was
4817
provided as Security Guard by the Samiti to the non- applicant management through the agreement Ex. A- l, which was executed by the management and the Samiti which wasduly registered one . These facts also go to prove that the economic control over the workman was not of the non-applicant management but it rested in the Samiti itself, which received the consolidated amount from the management and thereafter it disbursed to the Security Guards . Simply on the basis of the duty charts maintained by the non-applicant management, it cannot be presumed by any stretch of imagination that he non - applicant management exercised the direct control over the workman. It simply shows that in order to verify his presence in the establishment, who had to perform his duty as Security- Guard on the conditions enshrined in the agreement Ex . A- 1, hisattendance was marked therein . The workman , on the basisof these facts , could not be able to prove that he was directly appointed by the non - applicant management and that the relationship of the employer and employee exists between the both the parties and that the agreement Ex . A- 1 executed between the management and the Samiti is a ruse or camouflage . The Ld . representative for the non- applicant management in support of his contention has referred to before me the judicial pronouncement made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Steel Authority of India & Ors . Vs. National Union Water Front Workers and Ors . reported in (2001 ) 7 SCC 1. The observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court for the sake of convenience is reproduced as below :-
"Neither Section 10 of the CLRA Act nor any other provision in the Act , whether expressly or by necessary implication, provides for automatic absorption of contract labour on issuing a notification by the appropriate Government under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 10, prohibiting employment ofcontract labour , in any process , operation or other work in any establishment . Consequently the principal employer cannot be required to order absorption of the contract labour working in the establishment concerned. " 25. The Hon'ble Court has further observed :-
"Onissuance of prohibition notification under Section 10 ( 1 ) of the CLRA Act prohibiting employment of contract labour or otherwise, in an industrial dispute brought before it by any contract labour in regard to conditions of service, the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract labour for work of the establishment under a genuine contract or is a mere ruse/ camouflage to evade compliance with various beneficial legislations so as to deprive the workers of the benefit 4818
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
thereunder. If the contract is found to be not genuine but a mere camouflage , the so- called contract will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services of the contract labour in the establishment concerned subject to the conditions as maybe specified by it for that purpose in the light of para 6 hereunder." And the Hon'ble Court has said " If the contract is found to be genuine and prohibition notification under Section 10( 1 ) of the CLRA Act in respect of the establishment concerned has been issued by the appropriate Government, prohibiting employment of contract labour in any process , operation or other work of any establishment and where in such process , operation or other work of the establishment the principal employer intends to employ regular workmen, he shall given preference to the erstwhile contract labour , if otherwise found suitable and , if necessary, by relaxing the condition as to maximum age appropriately , taking into consideration the age of the workers at ( lie time of their initial employmentby the contractor and also relaxing the condition as to academic qualifications other than technical qualifications . "
26.As per the principles propounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court , when it is shown that the workman is a contract labour, then the provision under Section 10m of the Contract Labour Regulation Act should be evoked and thereafter the Tribunal has to adjudicate as to whether the agreement executed between the employer and the contractor is a camouflage or a genuine . The facts narrated above lead to infer that the agreement Ex . A - l executed between the employer and the Samiti is a genuine one under which the security job was assigned to the Samiti , which provided the service of the workman to the management to perform the same . The workman was not appointed by the non - applicant management , but he was appointed by the Samiti itself who had the economic control over him . Accordingly . I find that the workman has not been able to prove issues no . 1 and 2 in his favour . As such , both these issues are clinched against the workman and in favour of the management.
ISSUES NO . 3 & 4
27 The workman in his affidavit has stated that at the time of retrenchment , the juniors to him were employed and as per his information new recruitment has been made after his retrenchment without providing him an opportunity. But he has not disclosed the names of the juniors who were working at the time of his retrenchment and the employees who were appointed subsequent to his retrenchment . Accordingly , the deposition of the workman is vague and he could not be able to disclose those facts which were necessary to prove these facts . Hence , both these issues are decided against the workman.
וי
[PART II SEC.3 (ii)] ISSUE NO . 5
28. On the basis of the foregoing conclusion , the workman has not been able to prove his claim which deserves to be disallowed .
29. In the result, the reference is answered in the negative and it is held that the workman is not entitled to be reinstated in the service and his claim is disallowed .
30. Let a copy of the award be sent to Central Government for publication under Section 17( 1 ) ofthe Act . R. C. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 जून, 2003
का.आ. 1854.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार, यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रींय सरकार को 9-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं . एल-12012/349/97- आई.आर. (बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th June , 2003
S.O. 1854. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 69/98) ofthe Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Kanpur (U.P. ) as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workman, received by the Central Government on 9-6-2003.
[No. L- 12012/349/97 - IR (B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT SARVODAUA NAGAR, KANPUR, U.P. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ΝΟ . 69/1998 Inthe matter of dispute between---Raj Kumar Sonekar C/ o B. P. Saxena, 426 -W- 2 , Basant Vihar, Kanpur .
AND
Divisional Manager ,
UCO Bank,
Kapoorthala Commercial Complex , Sahara Bhawan , Lucknow.
AWARD
1. Central Govt . Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , vide its Notification No. L- 12012/349/97 -IR ( B- II) dated 21-4-98 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank in terminating the services of Raj Kumar [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4819
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़ 14, 1925
Sonekar w.e.f. 12-6-96 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what reliefthe said workman is entitled to ? " 2. The learned predessor before entering into merits of the industrial dispute considered the pleadings of the parties and framed a preliminary issue which runs as follows : -
Whether the domestic enquiry conducted by the management was not fair and proper.?
3. The learned predecessor vide order dated 9-5-01 has held that the domestic enquiry conducted by the management against the workman was fair and proper . The preliminary issue as framed above was answered in nagative against the workman by my learned predecessor vide order referred above. Having concluded the domestic enquiry as fairand proper the only matter remain to be decided about the quantum of punishment awarded by the management against the delinquent employee.
4. Heard the parties . Before concluding it is worthwhile to mention that the delinquent workman Sri Raj Kumar Sonekar was charged for misappropriating the amount of Rs . 35,500/- on three occassions . He was held guilty ofthe charge for this lapse on the enquiry conducted inaccordance with the principles of law and observing all the required cannons of law .
5. My learned predecessor has observed that the enquiry conducted by the management against the workman is fair and proper . As the charges proved against the workman are grave and serious in nature it does not call for any leniency against the workman.
6. Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in its pronouncement reported in 2000 (27) FIR page 322 between State Bank of India and Tarun Kumar Banerjee and other has held that the scope of interference by the tribunal is very limited and that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to sit injudgement over the deceision of employer as an appellate body. This Tribunal is fortified by above law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in holding that in the circumstances of the present case the tribunal has no jurisdiction to interefere with the punishment awarded to the delinquent employee by his employer . The learned representative for the workman has rightly conceaded that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to interefere with the punishment awarded by the management against its workman in case domestic enquiry conducted by the management as above held to be fair and proper .
7. In the circumstances of the case this is not proper to make any interference in the punishment awarded to the workmanby the management of bank .
8. Reference is , therefore , answered in negative against the workman and it is held that the workman is not entitled for any relief whatsoever in pursuance ofpresent reference made to this tribunal .
SURESH CHANDRA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 जून, 2003
का. आ. 1855.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न रीजनल लैंग्युऐज सेन्टर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों केबीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी -1/58 ऑफ 94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -42012/180/93- आई. आर. ( डी यू) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th June , 2003
S.O. 1855. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 1 / 58 of 94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, No. 1 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of Western Regional Language Central and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-6-2003 .
[No. L-42012/ 180/93 - IR (DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO 1 MUMBAI Present Shri Justice S.C.Pandey Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT-58/1994
Parties:
Employers in relation to the Management of Western Regional Language Centre AND Their Workmen
Appearances:
: Mr. B. M. Masurkar, Adv . : Mr. M. B. Anchan , Adv .
: Maharashtra
For the Management For the Workman State
Mumbai the 27th day of May, 2003 AWARD
1. This is a reference made by the Central Government under clause (d) of sub- section 1 of Section 10 ofIndustrial Disputes Act , 1947 (the Act for short ) read withsub - section 2A thereof. The terms of reference are as follows:
"Whether the action of the employer in relation to Western Regional Language Pune in terminating the 4820
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14 , 1925
services of Smt. Ramabai S. Solanki , Sweeper is justified in peculiar facts and circumstances of the case ? If not, what is the relief to which she is entitled to ? " 2. In her Statement of Claim Ramabai Solanki ( the workman for short ) claimed that she was appointed as a full time sweeper by the Principal , Western Regional Languages Centre , Deccan College Pune ( the employer) . For no reason the salary of the workman was reduced by 50% as per letter dated 02-5-1985 . Her work was of permanent nature as elaborated in the letter dated 03-11-1970. The workman worked for 17 years continuously as would clear from her salary certificate dated 16-6-1987 . The services of the workman were terminated from 15-1-1992 . The workman claimed that on 15-1-1992 . She had served continuously, worked for 25 years and 14 days . Shewas getting a salary of Rs . 420/- per month which were not even minimum wages . It was claimed that workman be reinstated as she was not given any opportunity of hearing before termination . In case the employer did not want retain her, then she should be paid an amount equivalent to her salary for the years till she reached 60 years . She also claimed difference in wages throughout with 18% interest . She stated that she had raised the industrial dispute .
3. The employer claimed that the dispute should have been raised before Central Administrative Tribunal . It has been stated that workman had approached Central Administrative Tribunal . The Application filed by the workman was rejected by that tribunal by order dated 19-8-1991 . It was stated that the workman was initially appointed as a part time sweeper from 12-10-1970 . She was appointed as full time sweeper from January 1985 to April 1985 and November 1985 to 12th June 1988. Thereafter , she was again employed as a part time sweeper . The reason for terminating her services was that the workman working as full time Sweeper with American Institute of Indian Studies from 01-1-1967 . She was getting full benefits of monthly salary and other benefits like gratuity , medical reimbursement and other allowances available to a full time employee in that Institute . The aforesaid information was suppressed by the workman. She wanted to claim the benefit ofboth the services . She suppressed material information and tried to mislead both the Offices . In such a situation question of giving her benefit of reasonable opportunity did not arise . For all the aforesaid reason the workman is not entitled to any relief.
4. The workman filed her rejoinder . Thereafter the amendment was made in the written statement with a view to show why the reference was not maintainable . It was claimed that the department cannot be said to be an industry. The workman was covered by Section 2 (s ) ofthe Act . No legal right was created on her . She was covered by proviso (bb ) to Section 2(oo) of the Act . It was claimed thatthe material suppression of fact that the workman was employed in another Institute by itself was sufficient for discharge of the workman . The amendment was allowed
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] on 24/4/1996 . The amendment has not been incorporated inthe written statement . However , it could be treated as an additional written statement .
5. The workman examined herself as a witness on 07/5/1997 . She was cross examined. She was recalled again for cross examination in 29/1/1999 . She examined another witness Haribhau Pardeshi . He was cross examined . Thereafter the workman closed her case . Smt . Usha Nair who had filed the affidavit dated 07/3/2002 , was cross examined on behalf of the workman by her counsel Shri.M.B.Anchan .
> 6. The question that arises for consideration is if the workman was entitled to any relief in this reference . The employer has come up with a plea that it is not an industry . It was claimed that the Western Regional Centre is the subordinate office Central Institute of Indian Language , Mysore. It is mainly involved in research on languages . The entire structure comes under Ministry of Human Resource Development Deptt. The Human Resource Development Department ofGovernment cannot be treated as an Industry. Nor can thework of the Institute can be treated as an industry. In the opinion of this tribunal , there can be no doubt that imparting educational training or giving education is the sovereign function of state . The Institute in question is carrying on linguistic research. Therefore , primarily it cannot be treated as an industry . It is exercising the sovereign function of State . However , an institute of education can be treated as an industry provided its organization shows prominent features of an industry as opposed to merely marginal. In the opinion of this tribunal there are no such distinct features . No evidence has been led to show by the workman in this case regarding the organization of the Institute . Mrs. Nair was in the witness box for cross examination . She was not cross - examined from the point of view of sovereign functions of State or from the point of view of dominant nature test. If Institute was part and parcel of development of human resources , it was definitely performing a sovereign function . The research activity done by the Institute in Marathi , Gujrati and Sindhi must be from the point of resource development . It was training Institute for teachers in the original languages . The institute garners human beings for the welfare ofthe country . The institute is so small that the sovereign functions dominate so prominently that distinct features of an industry cannot be called out . Ithas not been proved that it carries out complex activities like an University or a Corporation . It is too small a unit to be covered by the definition of " industry " given in section 2 (J) of theAct .
7. Consequently , this tribunal is of the view that Western Regional Language Centre Deccan College, Pune is not an industry and for this reason this reference cannot be answered as the dispute in question is not an industrial dispute coveredby the Act . The reference is answered accordingly.
S.C. PANDEY , Presiding Officer 4821 भारत काराजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़ 14, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नईदिल्ली, 10 जून, 2003
dispute is between the management of Southern Railway andtheirworkman Sri U.L. Sasi . The dispute referred is:
"Whether the action of the management ofExecutive Engineer ( Const. ) , Southern Railway, Ernakulam in terminating the services of Shri . U. L. Sasi is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman concerned is entitled?"
का. आ. 1856.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सार्दन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय, एर्नाकुलम के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
In the reference the management is represented by theExecutive Engineer (Construction) , Southern Railway, Ernakulam andthe workman is represented by the General Secretary, Southern Railway Men's Union Tripunithura.
[सं. एल-41012/102/94- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th June, 2003
2.On receipt of notices issued from this court both the management and union appeared through counsel .
S.O. 1856.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Labour Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Southern Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 9-6-2003.
[No. L-41012/102/94- IR(B- 1 ) ]
AJAY KUMAR, Desk Offier
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM (Labour Court, Ernakulam) (Friday, the 28th day ofFebruary, 2003)
Present:
Smt. N. Thulasi Bai , B.A. , LL.B. , PresidingOfficer. Industrial Dispute No. 21 of 1996(C) BETWEEN
1. The Executive Engineer (Construction ), Southern Railway, Ernakulam - 682011 (2 ) the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Trivandrum . (No.2 is impleaded as per order in M.P. No. 19/98 , dated 6-7-1998).
AND
The General Secretary, Southern Railway Men's Union , Prakash Bhavan , Railway Station Road, Tripunithura - 682301 .
REPRESENTATIONS :
For Managements
.For Union
Sri M.C. Cherian , Standing Counsel for Railways , Amulia Street, Kochi-18 Sri C. S. Ajith Prakash , Advocate, 402, Imperial Buildings , Flower Junction , T.D. Road, Kochi-35.
3. The workman filed a claim statement raising the following claims: The workman was a casual labourer employed in the Railway continuously from 12-6-1975 to 6-8-1981 with some artificial break and he was denied employment w.e.f. 7-8-1981 without complying the formalities of the Industrial Disputes Act . The workman was entitled to get temporary status on completion of continuous service of 120 days as per the provisions in the Railway Establishment Manual . The workman who acquired temporary status cannot be discharged from service without giving notice . The workman was issued with casual . labour service card showing the details of service duly authenticated by a responsible officer of the Railway. It is evident from the casual labour service card that the workman was discharged from service on the ground that he was found medically unfit in B1 category, when subjected to medical examination for the purpose of regularisation in the Railway . The above aspect was not communicated to the workman. The rules related to medical classification at the time of medical examination in the Railway specifies that a casual labourer when found unfit in category should be considered for a category which requires lower medical classification . The above rule has been violated by the management in the case of the workman. The management had engaged many casual labourers who were found medically unfit and who were junior to the workman . It is evident from the casual labour service card of the workman thathewas continuously worked for more than 120 days in the open line , that is under the Permanent Way Inspector , Southern Railway. The workman had worked 317 days under the management thereby the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act had to be followed before his termination . Several juniors of the workman were re- engaged thereby the management has violated the provisions of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act . Considering the above aspects the workman prays for declaring his termination as illegal and to direct the management to reinstate the workman with continuity of service and full backwages .
AWARD
Thisreference was made by the Central Government asper letter No. L-41012 / 102/94- IR(BI) dated 3-9-96 . The
4.Management filed a written objection raising the following contentions :- The Executive Engineer who has been impleaded as management in the I.D. has nothing to 1734GI2003-17 4822
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SBC. 3( ii)]
alternate appointment for employees who become medically unfit as included in Chapter XXVI of the Railway Establishment Manual are meant for safeguarding the interest ofregular railway employees who become medically unfit mainly due to long service in Railway of due to the nature of the ardous job undertaken by them. The circular referred in the claim petition is not at all applicable to the case of the workman . The workman has not made any request for any remedical examination , absorption in posts requiring lower medical fitness etc. The decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal and award of this court in I.D. 12/91 ( Central) etc. referred in the claim petition have nobearingin the present case as the workman in the present case is not equally located with the persons included in those cases. Whether legal formalities were complied with before the termination ofthe workman cannot be ascertained as the concerned records are not traceable due to lapse of long period . The workman is not entitled to get any relief as per the reference and so the management prays for desmissal of the reference .
5. Basing on the contention raised in the written statement filed by the Executive Engineer, Construction , Southern Railway who was included as the management, the senior Divisional Personnel Officer , Southern Railway, Trivandrum was impleaded as additional second management at the instance of the workmen as per M.P. 19/98 . A rejoinder was also filed by the workman on the date of filing the impleading petition transversing the conterntions raised in the written statement filed by original management and reiterating the claims in the claim statement.
6. The additional second respondent on receipt of notice from this court appeared through the very same counsel appearing for the management and filed a written objection stating as follows : The impleadment of additional second management is inconsistent and beyond the scope ofthe reference order wherein the iegality of the action of the Executive Engineer has been specificaliy referred for adjudication . The impleadment itself will establish the lack of bonafides in the claims raised by the workman. By the impleadment the very nature and scope of the reference order are altered which affects the very jurisdiction of this court . Apart from the above the additional second respondent also adopts contentions raised by original management in its written statement.
7. For the purpose of this case evidence adduced from both sides which consists of the testimony of the workman as WW1 and Exts . W1 to W7 and M1 . No oral evidence was adduced by the Management.
8. Thus the points arise for determination are:
(1) Whether the reference is maintainable?
do with the termination of the workman concerned . At the time of alleged termination in 1981 the claimant was a casual labourer under the Permanent Way Inspector, Ernakulam who was a senior subordinate in the open line wing of railway and thus the employer of the claimant was the Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Trivandrum. So the I.D. as against the Executive Engineer is not maintainable and sustainable in law and is liable to be dismissed on that ground . There are mainly two separate wings in the Railway , that is construction Wing and Open Line Wing which are under separate Chief Engineers . It is evident from the casual labour card produced by the workman that at the time of the alleged termination of this service he was under Permanent Way Inspector, Emakulam who is a senior subordinate under the open line Engineering Wing. Actually there is no factual basis and justification for the present Industrial Dispute . The workman though initially engaged in the Construction Wing on 12-6-75 , he was settled on 8-3-76. Though he was actually settled on 5-2-1976 he had to be continued up to 8-3-76 due to a court order and he was discharged when the court order has been vacated. Thereafter he never worked in the construction wing. But he joined as a fresh casual labourer in the Open Line Wing under the permanent Way Inspector , Kottayam w.e.f. 21-7-1977 . There he worked for less than 6 months and was settled on 3-1-1978 . Thereafter he was again engaged on 21-2-80 and was discharged from service w.e.f. 7-8-81 due to medical unfitness . At that time he was working under Permanent Way Inspector , Ernakulam . The workman has not made any complaint or representation against the above termination but nearly after 15 years he has taken steps for raising the above 1.D. challenging the termination by impleading a wrong person as the management . The impleadment of the wrong person is a deliberate and dishonest attempt to avoid a proper contest and to get a favourable verdict . Thus the I.D. is liable to be dismissed in limini due to inordinate delay, latches and lapses. It is a stale claim . The workman was never considered for regularisation or absorption in regular service . Normally the tum of an Engineering Casual labourer for regularisation will come only after atleast 10 years of service . The medical examination in question for which the workman was sent wasthe initial medical examination to be done at the time of initial engagement . The workman happened to be initially engaged without complying the formality of undergoing such inedical examination . That aspect was noticed by the time he was eligible for temporary status . Accordingly he was sent for medical examination . This was to ascertain whether he was medically fit for engagement as a casual labourer . The workman was certified to be unfit in B1 medical category which is essential for all Engineering Casual labourers and such Group D employees . Thus it is clear that the workman was not at all eligible for initial engagement as casual labourer in the Engineering Department . That is why he was discharged from service on the ground of medical unfitness . The provisions for
(2) Whether the action of the management of Executive Engineer ( Construction) , Southern Railway , Ernakulam in terminating the service of Sri . U.L. Sasi is legal and justified?
4823 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/ आषाढ़ 14, 1925
(3) What ifany are the reliefs the workman is entitled to?
9. Points : Admittedly Sri . U.L. Sasi , the workman involved in the present case was working as casual labourer in the open Line of Southern Railway from 12-6-1975 to 7-8-1981 with intermitant break and he was terminated on 7-8-1981 due to medical unfitness . At the time of his termination he was working under the Permanent Way Inspector, Ernakulam and at that time he was continuously engaged from 21-2-1980 to 7-8-1981 are not disputed . It is true that after termination on 7-8-1981 the workman has chosen to challenge the same by filing complaint only in 1994. In the written statement filed by the management it is contended that the I.D. is not maintainable since it is a stale claim that too by impleading a wrong person as management .
10. As regards the contention of impleadment of wrong person in the party array it has to be noted that in the reference the management is Southern Railway and the Executive Engineer (Construction) , Southern Railway, Ernakulam is impleaded to represent the actual management. Inthe written statement filed by the Executive Engineer he has raised all contentions which have to be raised by the Southern Railway and so it cannot be found that the workman had impleaded a wrong person as the management . Moreover in view of the contention raised by the Executive Engineer (Construction ) who was shown as the person to represent the management the Senior Divistonal Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Trivandrum was impleaded as additional management who adopted the contentions raised by the Executive Engineer (Construction) who was already in the party array. So the contention raises by the management that the reference is made by impleading a wrong person in the party array cannot be accepted.
11. While considering the contention of the managment that the reference is based on a stale claim it is noticeable that the Central Government declined to refer the dispute as per the petition filed by the workman which was challeged by the workman by filing O.P. 20078/95 before the Hon'ble High Court and as per the judgment in the O.P. the Central Government was directed to pass fresh order with regard to the dispute raised by the workman as accordingly the present dispute was referred for adjudication . As it is evident from the written statement filed by the management that documents are available in respect of the engagement of the workman as necessary details are given in the claim statement filed by the workman and necessary documents are given in the claim statement filed by the workman and necessary documents are produced.to support the claim it cannot be found that the claim of the workman is a stale one which affects the maintainability of the reference . Thus it can be found that the contentions raised by the management regarding the maintainability of the reference are not sustainable thereby it can be found that the reference is maintainable .
12. Then next question to be determined is that whether the present workman is entitled to get any relief from the opposite party as per the reference. As referred earlier it is not disputed that the workman was working as a casual labourer in the Open Line under the Permanent WayInspector, Kottayam and Ernakulam from 12-6-1975 to 7-8-1981 with intermitant breaks . Exts . W1 (a) and W1 are the casual labour service cards seem to be issued by the Permanent Way Inspector under the Southern Raiway. Photocopy of the above documents were produced by the workman along with the claim statement . Though it was contended in para -8 of the written objection filed by the management that the authonticity ofthe casual labour card as regards the entries after 2-9-1980 are doubtful and put to strict proofby the claimant, when the original documents were produced and marked as Exts . Wl (a) and W1 there was no objection from the managements side about the authenticity. Moreover, Ext. W1 and W1 (a) are documents issued by the Permanent Way Inspector under the Southern Railway and they can be accepted as proved through the evidence of MW1 . Further the authenticity of the documents is not disputed as per the statement in para-4 of the written objection. Thus it is proved through Exts . W1 and W1 (a) that the present workman was working as a casual labourer at the first instance under the construction wing from 12-6-1975 to 8-3-1976 and thereafter in the open line wing from 21-7-1977 to 7-8-1981 with some intermitant breaks . It is proved through Ext . W1 that the workman was working as a casual labourer in the open line wing without any break from 21-2-1980 to 7-8-81 on which date he appears to be terminated due to medical unfit in clause B1 as per certificate referred therein . As per the provisions in the Indian Railway Establishment Manual a workman engaged as casual labourer in open line is entitled to temporary status on completion of 4 month's continuous service from thedate ofhis appointment . Thus it is clear that the present workman was entitled for temporary status much earlier to his discharge or termination on the ground of medical unfitness . It is true that the workman had to be subjected to medical examination before giving temporary status. In the present case it appears that the workman was sent for medical examination during August 1981 and found as medically unfit. Thus it is clear that the management was negligent in sending the workman for medical examination atthe proper time and to give temporary status accordingly. Themedical unfitness appears to be in clause B1 . Ext. W2 Circular No. 3/1973 issued by the Railway Board indicates that the casual labourer sent for medical examination for considering inregular appointment should be subjected to a relaxed standard of medical examination . It is further evidence From Ext . W2 that if casual labourer is found medically unfit for a particular category he should be considered for alternative category requiring a lower medical classification . There were instances where casual labourers found medically unfit in B1 class of medical examination were given alternate employment in other categories which 4824
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5, 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
In the result, an award is passed finding that the action of the management of Southern Railway in terminating the service of Sri . U.L. Sasi , the workman concerned , as casual labourer is not legal and notjustified . The management is directed to reinstate the workman with continuity of service but without backwages . He will be provided temporary status and regular appointment on the same category or in an alternate category in accordance withthe medical examination .
This award will take offect one month after its publication in the Official Gazette .
Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed and typed out by her , corrected by me and passed this the 28thday of February, 2003 .
N. THULASI BAI , Presiding Officer
Ernakulam .
APPENDIX
Witnese examined on the side of the Workman;
WWI Sri . U.L. Sasi .
Exhibite marked on the side of Management: Photo copy of empanel of Casual Labourers . Exhibite marked on the side of Workman:
Ext. WI . Casual labour service card issued by the management to the workman U. L. Sasi .
Ext. WI . (a): Casual Labour Service card in the name of Sri . U.L. Sasi .
Ext. W2 . P.A.M. Circular No. 3/72.
Ext. W3 . Judgment in O.A. No. 13/92 in the Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench .
Ext. W4 . Photo copy of award in I.D. 12/91 (C) by this Court.
Ext. W5 . Postal Acknowledgement card .
Ext. W5 . (a) : Another Post Acknowledgement Card .
Ext. W6. Photo copy of Judgment in O.P. No. 13376/95 ofthe Hon'ble High Court .
Ext. W7 . Letter issued by Executive Engineer (Construction ) Ernakulam to the Asst . Labour Commissioner , Ernakulam.
नई दिल्ली, 10 जून , 2003
का. आ. 1857.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या जी जी आई टी -18/ 1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-06-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12012/ 254/97- आई. आर. (बी -1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी required lower medical examination . Ext . W3 is thecopy of judgment in O.A. No. 13/92 filed by one P.B. Pavithran against the Southern Railway . As per the Ext. W3 the learned Administrative Tribunal had directed the Southern Railway to consider the case of the applicant therein and to take appropriate action by considering him for a category oflower medical classifications . Ext . W4 is the copy of the award passed by this court in I.D. 12/91 (C) in which the Southern Railway was the management Sri . T.T. Iype was the workman . The facts and circumstances in the case referred in Ext. W4 are identical to the facts and circumstances of the present case . As per Ext . W4 this court found that the action of the management of Southorn Railway in terminating the services of the workman Sri . T.T. Iype as a casual labourer is unjustified and the management was directed to reinstate the workman concerned with continuity of service and with 50% of the backwages . The above award passed by this court was challenged by the management before the Hon'ble High Court by filing O.P. No. 13336/ 1995 - K. The Hon'ble High Court as per judgment dated 19-8-1995 dismissed the O.P. by confirming Ext. W4. Ext . W6 is the copy of judgment in the above O.P. It is evident from Ext . W7 reply dated 15-2-1994 issued from the office of the Executive Engineer ( Construction ) . Ernakulam to the complaint filed by the workman before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central) , Kochi that as perthe directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Indirpal Yadav'scase there is separate seniority list of project casual Labours are maintained based on those who were in service on or after 1-1-1981 and those who were retrenched for want ofwork etc. prior to 1-1-1981. The persons included in the second senirotiy list will be taken only when the peresons in the first seniority list are exhausted and the workman's case will be considered in his turn if he had registered his name for inclusion in the second seniority list at appropriate time as per the notification enclosed. Ext . M1 is stated to be the copy of list of casual labourers empanelled for appointment as temprorary gangman (Group-D) which does not include the name of the workman. Itisevident from Ext . M1 and W7 that the present workman is not a person who comes within the categories referred therein since he was a casual labourer in the open line who had a continuous service of more than 4 months required for conferring temporary status. Thus on going through Exts . W1 , W1 ( a) , W2 , W3 , W4 and W6 and the oral evidence of the wokman as WWI it can be found that the termination of the workman herein by the management on the ground ofmedical unfitness when conferring ternporary status is not legal and justifiable thereby he is entitled to be reinstated in service . He should be given temporary status and regular appointment in the same category or in an alternative category in accordance with the necessary medical examination. Considering the delay in taking action by the workman he is not entitled to get any backwages . Points are answered accordingly.
"י 4825 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/ आषाढ़14, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi, the 10th June , 2003
theorders ofRegional Manager , State Bank of India, Region. No.4 from 4/1/1988 . His services were terminated with effect from 9/3/1997 orally . It was claimed by him that he worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year prior to passing ofthe order of termination . The order of termination was in violation of Section 25F and 25G of the Act .
S.O. 1857. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 18/1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. I Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 09-06- 2003.
[No. L- 12012/254/97 - IR(B. 1)]
AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 MUMBAI
PRESENT:
Shri Justice S.C. Pandey
Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. CGIT- 18/1998
Parties:
Employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India AND Their Workmen .
Appearances:
:Mr. Nanwani, Adv.
Forthe Management
For tire Workman :Workman present in persons
: Maharashtra
State
Munibai, dated the 20th day of May, 2003 AWARD
3. The Bank in its written statement denied the claim made by the workman. It was stated that the workman had worked intermittently as temporary Messenger, Messenger- cum-Watchman/Badli Watchman at Balapur Branch and the Balapur Agricultural Branch of the Bank . He had not completed 240 days in a calendar year as prescribed by law. Itwas pleaded that the work of watchman in different branches in different capacities could not be clubbed together. It was stated that the Branch Manager of a Branch should be treated as employer of each Branch. It was stated inthe written statement that All India State Bank of India Staff Federation a registered union of the employees of the Bank (the Federation for short) entered into settlements dated 17/11/1987 . This settlements was subsequently modified by the Settlements of 16/7/1988 , 27/10/1988 , 09/1/ 1991 and 30/7/1996. It was agreed by the aforesaid settlement that temporary employees shall be given opportunity to be absorbed . The eligibility panel of workman for subordinate cadre were created . The process ofabsorption was to kept alive till 31/3/1997 . The workman applied for absorption. He was selected for empanelment . However , the list was exhausted on 31/3/1997 . It was claimed that by virtue of clause 12 of the Settlement dated 17/11/1987 and also by clause 9 thereof the workman could not raise such dispute . The clause 10 was also invoked. The Bank also took the plea that the workman was appointed on daily wages/casual /temporary by the branches . The appointments were irregular and illegal as the authorities of these branches had no power to make appointments . The workman was appointed on purely temporary/daily basis . The workman was liable to be removed from service . The appointment of the workman was void ab initio . It was opposed to public within the meaning of Section 23 ofthe Contract Act. It was said that adaily wager cannot claim right to regularization .
1. This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its power vested in it under clause 1(d) ofsub Section (1 ) of Section ( 10 ) read with sub - Section 2A of Section (10 ) of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (the Act for short) for resolving the industrial dispute between the State Bank of india, (the Bank for short) and one Gajanan Sakharam Kale (the workman for short) . The terms ofreference as given in the schedule to order of reference are as follows :
"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Through ( 1 ) Regional Manager , Region IV , Zonal Office , Kingsway , Nagpur (2) The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Balapur Main Branch , Dist. Akola in terminating the services of Shri Gajanan Sakharam Kale, w.e.f. 8-3-1997, is legal andjustified? Ifnot, what is the relief to which she is entitled to ? "
1
4. The workman filed the rejoinder and clarified his stand as follows: It was not disputed by the workman that he was appointed intermittently. However, he claimed the break in service with an intention to deprive the workman continuity in service . He asserted that he had been already employed with bank for 240 days in a calendar year . It was stated that he was not an employee of the branches of the Bank. The Bank was a compact unit. It was claimed that the workman had applied for permanent post .He was placed at number 1 in the panel . On the other hand , a person at No. 10 Sunil was absorbed.
5. This tribunal did not frame any issue on the questions involved. The issues are simple and the partles knew their own case . The real point involved is already 2. The workman in his statement of claim made the following statement in respect of the dispute . The workman claimed that he was employed by the Bank from 9/1/1988 in the main branch of the Bank at Balapur Dist . Akola under 4826
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART 11 SEC. 3( ii) ] clear from the terms of reference . The claim of the workman is that the termination of his services amounts to retrenchment . The claim of the Bank is that it does not . The workman examined himself by filing affidavit in lieu of examination in chief. The Bank filed the affidavit of Mr.H.B.Tamboli . He was cross - examined . Thereafter , the Bank closed its case .
his employment in both the branches of Bank prior to his termination . It appears to this tribunal had not disputed the position before the Conciliation Officer by filing the document annexed as W3 . It shows that the workman had worked for 230 days in 1996 and 55 days in 1997. If we exclude 20 days of Jan. 5 days of February and 8 days of March, 1996 from the above then also the workman would be deemed for 251 days between 08/3/1996 to 08/3/1997 . The above finding is amply, supported by the documents Ml and M2 filed by the Bank itself. Therefore , this tribunal holds that it cannot be disputed that the workman had worked for more than 240 days.
7. The Bank has tried to contend that employment in different branches cannot be counted . This tribunal holds thatvarious branches of State Bank of India do not have a individual identity as a legal person . The State Bank of India is the Corporate Entity . The definition of Banking company includes the State Bank of India under Section 2(bb) of the Act . The State Bank of India is a Statutory bodygovernedby State Bank of India Act, 1955. Ifwe read the definitions given in Section 2( a) , 2( bb ) , 2 ( g ) , ( 2J ) and 2(s) together that workman cannot be held to be employee of a particular branch . He shallbe allowed to be the employee of the State Bank of India . The branches are merely part and parcel of the larger entity .
8. In this connection a plea was taken that the appointment of the workman was illegal being without any sanction from the proper authorities of the Bank . Firstly, no evidence was led to show that an appointment made by a branch manager was barred by any rule having the force of law. Secondly, no evidence was led to the effect that a branch Manager oftheBank was not in fact delegated with the power to make appointment . Thirdly , it appears that power was delegated as Ex M6 , Ex M7 and M8 . The warning given to the Branch Manager that the workman should not be permitted to work for more than 240 days appears to be unfair labour practice. However , this tribunal need not comment upon such unhealthy labour practice in view of finding that the workman had actuallyworked more than 240 days cumulatively in both the branches . The statement of the workman that his services were orally terminated by Branch Manager Agricultural Development Bank on telephonic instructions from the Manager ofMain Branch of Bank Balarpur who had deployed isaccepted as it is not rebutted.
9. The conclusion is that the termination order dated 08/3/1997 is illegal and void because it amounted to retrenchment in violation of Section 25F of the Act. This tribunal is further of the view that this is a fit case the workman should be granted reinstatement . The workman inhis cross examination had stated that he lived upon the earnings ofthe members of his family . The workman denied thathe earned his livelihood . He stated that he lived upon the income ofhis wife . No evidence in rebuttal was led by the Bank . Ever so looking to the fact that considerable period has elapsed and the fact workman would not sit at 6. The claim of the workman is that he was retrenched without payment of retrenchment compensation and notice of retrenchment . He was entitled to benefit of Section 25 F of the Act and , therefore , the termination of his service was illegal . The affidavit of the workman is to the effect that he was working with the Bank between 4/1/1988 to 8/3/1997 . He claimed to have worked for more than 240 days continuously during the preceding 12 months from date of his oral termination . He claimed that he was covered by Section 25B of the Act. He referred to the documents filed by him in proof of his statement. He claimed that his services were terminated but his juniors were returned in service . He named them as Hiralal Ramsingh Thakur, Pratapsingh Dashrath Rajode and Ram Chaudhary Dhonde . It was claimed by him that before the Conciliation Officer the Bank had admitted that the workman had served for more than 240 days . In cross - examination the workman stated that he was employed as daily wager. Sometimes, he was required to work as a watchman sometimes , as a messenger . The workman stated that in the calendar year preceding the date of his termination of his services he had worked for more than 240 days in the main branch of the Bank at Balarpur and another branch of the Bank known as Balarpur Agricultural Development Branch . He claimed that hehad worked cumulatively for more than 240 days in both the branches . He clarified that he was called upon to work Agricultural Development Branch at the instance of the manager of main branch when he was working . The workman stated that the manager of Agricultural Development Branch told him not to attend the office from 09/3/1997 because the Manager of the Main Branch had required him to do so . He relied on the documents Wl to 12 and specifically referred to chart W13 for showing that he had worked for more than 240 days. The contention of the workman that he had worked for more than 240 days cumulatively in the aforesaid two branches of the bank does not appear to be in dispute . The affidavit filed in lieu ofexamination in chief in paragraph 3 by Shri . A.B.Tamboli states in so many words the workman worked between 9/7/1996 to 8/3/1997 for 43 days in the main branch and for 208 days in the Agricultural Development . It was , however, sought to be shown that the branch Manager had appointed the workman without having any power to do so. The appointment of the workman was done through employment exchange . It was stated the workman was not subjected to the process of regular appointment. In cross examination this witness admitted the document W2 and W3 . He admitted in the opinion of this tribunal , rightly the workman had worked for more than 240 days if we counted [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4827 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़ 14, 1925
1
New Delhi , the 11th June, 2003
S.O. 1858. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 184/97). ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Sainya Dairy Farm and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 11-06-2003.
[No. L- 14012/ 2/97- IR (DU) ]
KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
home living on the earnings of his wife , as he had stated, this tribunal holds that statement of the workman is not totally reliable . However , it appears to this tribunal that workman may be earning much less during this period of the unjust unemployment by the Bank. It would be proper to grant him an order of reinstatement with 1/2 of the back wages from 08/3/1997 to date of reinstatement. In the opinion of this tribunal the cases cited by the Bank reported in 1982 SC 1268 Agencia Commercial International Ltd. vs. Custodian ofBranches ofBanco National Ulbamarino, 1995 Labour IC 2012 Sarvjanik Nirman Majdoor Sangh vs. Labour Judge 1988 Lab IC 1125 Vijaysingh vs. State of Rajasthan do not deal with the branches of State Bank of India and therefore , they are inapplicable .
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
NEWDELHI
Presiding Officer: Shri B.N. Pandey
I.D. No. 184/97
Shri Sanjay Ved Pal s/ o Shri Shambhu Prasad , through Virender Bhandari , C.I.T.U. Office ,
Local Bus Stand , Dehradoon.
...Workman
Versus
10. The terms of the reference are limited to termination of services of the workman. The question regarding the absorption of the workman was not referred to this tribunal . This tribunal is not competent to enlarge its jurisdiction by treating the question of absorption as incidental to the dispute . It is true that this question may have been raised before the Conciliation Officer but the Central Government has not referred that dispute to this tribunal, presumably because the question of absorption may arise only after the workman was reinstated and the order of termination is held to be discretion . This tribunal cannot sit injudgement over the order of reference made to it .
Farm Adhikari ,
Bhartya Sainya Dairy Farm , Garhi Cantt . , Dehradoon .
...Management
AWARD
11. The workman, however , may file a complaint under Section 33A of the Act or raise a fresh dispute regarding absorption before the Conciliation Officer after an order of reinstatement is passed pursuant to the award given by this tribunal .
The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 14012/2 /97-1.R. ( D.U. ) dated 27-10-97 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication :-
12. This tribunal does not consider it necessary to decide other points raised by the workman regarding his reinstatement .
"Whether the action of the management of Sainya Dairy Farm , Dehradun in terminating the service of Shri Sanjay Ved Pal , Casual Labour is just and fair? If not, to what relief he is entitled ? "
13.The reference is now answered by saying that the workman is entitled to be reinstated and accordingly, he shall be taken back in service by State Bank of India Main Branch , Balapur Distt . Akola. He shall be paid ½ back wages from 8/3/1997 . There shall be no order as to costs .
S.C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 11 जून , 2003
2. Reference was registered on 11-11-97 . Claim statement and written statement was filed and then case was fixed for rejoinder on 17-12-99 and till 31-5-2002 rejoinder was not filed and case was fixed for evidence of the workman by way of affidavit on 16-7-2002 . Till today affidavit not filed despite several opportunity . Hence opportunity to adduce evidence is closed.
3. In the absence of any evidence from either side . NoDispute Award is passed accordingly.
Dated 9-6-2003
B.N. PANDEY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
का. आ. 1858.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सैन्य डेयरी फॉर्म के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 184/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-06-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-14012/2/97- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी
का. आ. 1859.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में 4828
[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं . 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/149 का 1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
i [सं. एल-12012/44/98- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 12th June , 2003
S.O. 1859. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 2/149 of 1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - 1.abour Court , Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , received by the Central Government on 11-06-2003 .
of the management. Workman Attender was terminated by the management based on the proved charge of dishonestly removing all 48 Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates betweenthe period January, 1992 and July, 1993 and parting the said certificates for unlawful gain to one M/s . Pomona Exports. According to workman punishment of termination is disproportionate . It is his contention that he was made scapegoat to save the officers and that action of the management is tainted with victimisation amounting to unfair labour practice . Management's contention is that the punishment imposed was proportionate to the gravity of serious misconduct committed by the workman in banking industry where absolute devotion , diligence , integrity and honesty needs to be preserved by every bank employee . It is further the contention ofmanagement that failure to perform duties with diligence, integrity and honesty is acting in a manner unbecoming of a bank employee .
[No. L- 12012/44/ 98 - IR( B - II) ]
C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2 , MUMBAI
PRESENT :
S. N. Saundankar , Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT - 2/ 149 of1998
2.Workman filed affidavit in lieu of Examination- in- Chief (Exhibit- 50 ) in so far as action of the management and closed oral evidence vide purshis (Exhibit -52 ) . Management however did not lead oral evidence vide purshis ( Exhibit- 53 ) . Workman filed written submissions along with the copies of the rulings (Exhibit -54 ) and the management bank (Exhibit- 55/56 ) . On going through the record, written submissions , and hearing the counsels , I record my findings on the following issues for the reasons mentioned below :-
Fmplayers in rclaiton to the Management of Syndicate Bank
Issues
Findings Yes.
The Deputy General Manager,
Syndicate Bank , Zonal Officer ,
3. Whether the action of the management in terminating the service of Ashok Sawant is legal and justified ?
Maker Tower ' E ' , 2nd Floor , CuffeParade , Colaba, Mumbai -400005
V/ s .
Asperorder below.
4. If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ?
Their Workmen
REASONS
The Secretary,
Syndicate Bank Employees Union ,
PostBox No. 743 , Ground Floor, 10 , Homji Street , Fort , Mumbai -400 023 .
APPEARANCES :
: Mr. R. N. Shah ,
For the Employers
Advocate
Forthe Workmen
: Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant,
Advocate
Mumbai , dated 21st March , 2003.
AWARD- PART - II
3. Workman Sawant stated that to save the officers he has been made scapegoat and out of victimization punishment of termination has been imposed upon him . Hedisclosed that he put about 22 years service in the bank , and .considering his service punishment is disproportionate. Workman in his cross examination para.6 clearly admittedthat the charges levelled against him were ofgrave and serious nature . These charges as stated above have been proved . So far powers under section 11 - A is concerned court has to exercise judicially and in accordance with the well settled judicial principles . His Lordship of BombayHigh Court in USV Ltd. P/s. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union & Anr . 1997 ( 11 ) CLR 312 in para . 5 observed:
"In Christian Medical College Hospital Employees ' Union & Anr . V. Christian Medical College, Vellore Association & Ors . the Apex Court after considering its earlier judgment in Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. V. Their Workmen , AIR 1958 SC 130 observed that the powers of an Industrial Tribunal to interfere in cases ofdismissal of a workrnan by the management are By the Interim Award dated 21st March , 2002 this Tribunal held that the domestic inquiry conducted against the workman Sawant was as per the Principles of Natural Justice and the findings of the inquiry officer are not perverse . Consequently as per Section 11 A of the Industrial Disputes Act this Tribunal has to consider whether the punishment of termination imposed upon the workman is legal and justified in the context of the action 4829
भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़ 14, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
charged. In the case in hand , according to workman himself charges leveled against him are of grave and serious nature. Atthisjuncture, the Learned Counsel Mr. Shah urged with force that the Industrial Tribunal should be very careful before it interferes with the orders made by the bank in discharge of their managerial functions relying on Syndicate Bank Ltd. V/s It's Workmen 1966 II LLJpg.440 . Hesubmits that workman was working as an Attender , and that bank has no reason to victimise such workman . In so far as victimization he relied on M/s . Bharat Iron Works V/s . Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel and Ors . 1976 LIC pg.4 :
"Ordinarily a person is victimised , ifhe is made a victim or a scapegoat and is subjected to persecution , prosecution or punishment for no real fault or guilt of his own , in the manner , as it were , ofa sacrificial victim. It is, therefore , manifest for actual fault or guilt meriting the punishment is established , such action will be rid ofthe taint of victimisation . Victimisation is a serious charge by an employee against an employer , and, therefore, it must be properly and adequately pleaded giving all particulars upon which the charge is based to enable the employer to fully meet them . The charge must not be vague or indefinite being as it is an amalgam of facts as well as inferences and attitudes . The onus ofestablishing the plea of victimisation will be upon the person pleading it . Since a charge of victimisation is a serious matter reflecting, to a degree , upon the subjective attitude of the employer evidence by acts and conduct, these have to be established by safe and sure evidence . Mere allegations , vague suggestions, and insinuations are not enough . All particulars ofthe charge brought out, ifbelieved, must beweighed by the Tribunal and a conclusion should be reached on a totality of the evidence produced. " not unlimited and the Tribunal does not act as Court ofappeal and substitute its own judgment for that of the management . The Tribunal will interfere (a)where there is want of good faith ; (b ) when there is victimization or unfair labour practice; (c) when the management has been guilty of the basic error or violation of the principles of natural justice ; and (d) whenon the materials before the Court the finding is completely baseless or perverse. Emphasis of the Apex Court was that the Industrial Tribunal or the Labour Court cannot function arbitrarily and interfere with every decision of the management as regards dismissal or discharge of a workman arrived at in a disciplinary enquiry . The power under Section 11 -A has to be exercised judicially and the Industrial Tribunal or the Labour Court is expected interfere with the decision of the management under Section 11 -A of the Act only when it is satisfied that the punishment imposed by the management was highly disproportionate to the degree of guilt of the workman concerned . The Industrial Tribunal or for that matter the Labour Court has to give justifiable reasons for its decision . The power which Section 11 -A has conferred upon the Industrial Tribunal or the Labour Court to substitute a lesser punishment in lieu of the order of discharge or dismissal has to be exercised judicially and in accordance with the well settled judicial principles and could not have any colour of arbitrariness nor could be based on fanciful reasons . A three Judge Bench of the Apex Court in Kerala Solvent Extractions Ltd. , deprecated the increasing tendency of interference by the Labour Court or Tribunal on the question of punishment based on sympathy and extraneous considerations . The Apex Court thus observed :-
5.Management bank vide Written Statement (Exhibit- 8) para. 3 (a) pointed out the past record of the workman which has gone unchallenged to the effect that his probation period was extended and for that he was given warning and for submitting bogus LFC bills his increment waswith -held. Considering the proved misconduct which clearly point out lack of integrity and honesty on the part oftheworkman, back ground of past record in the light of the decision referred to above , hardly person like workman Attender can be allowed to work for a moment in the delicate industry like bank. In this context punishment imposed upon workman is not at all disproportionate , and that action ofthemanagement being totally legal and justified , workman isnot entitled to any relief and that his claim being devoid of substance , deserves to be dismissed . Issues are answered accordingly and hence the order :-
ORDER
"Inrecent times , there is an increasing evidence ofthis , perhapswell meant, but wholly unsustainable , tendency towards a denudation of the legitimacy of judicial reasoning and process . The reliefs granted by the Courts mustbe seen to be logical and tenable within the framework of the law and should not incur and justify the criticism that the jurisdiction of the Courts tends to degenerate into misplaced sympathy, generosity and private benevolence . It is essential to maintain the integrity of legal reasoning and the legitimacy of the conclusions . They must emanate logically from the legal findings and thejudicial results must be seen to be principled and supportable on those findings . Expansive judicial mood of mistaken and misplaced compassion at the expense ofthe legitimacy of the process will eventually lead to mutually irreconcilable situations and denude the judicial process ofitsdignity, authority, predictability and respectability. "
The action ofthe management of Syndicate Bank in terminating the services of Shri Ashok L. Sawant w.e.f. December, 1993 is legal and justified .
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer 4. It is settled position of law that penalty imposed must be commensurate with the gravity of the offence
1734G12003-19 4830
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14 , 1925
[PART I-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication:
Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank is justified by terminating Shri Rahul Sampat Pagare from the services of the Bank ? If not, then whatreliefthe workman is entitledto ?
का. आ. 1860.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रन्धतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकार के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं . 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 2/35 ऑफ 2000 को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-6-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12011/203/99-आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिष
New Delhi , the 12th June , 2003
S.O. 1860. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. 2/35 of 2000 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workman , received by the Central Government on 11-06-2003.
[No. L- 12011 /203/99- IR(B- II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
2.By the Staternent of Claim (Exhibit-8) Canara Bank Staff Union averred that Shri Pagare was orally engaged by Canara Bank as Peon and that he continuously worked from 7-5-93 till May'96 in the Cuffe Parade Branch , Mumbai in permanent post . It is pleaded that said Pagare worked more than 240 days during the calendar years . He was discharging his duties efficiently, consequently , he had made representation for regularising him from the date he was engaged , however, instead regularising his services hewas orallyterminated by the bank in May 1996 violating the provisions under the Industrial Disputes Act . It is contended Pagare made representations to the bank on 10-12-96 and 14-10-97- but in vain , therefore the union had approached the A.L.C (C) on 3-12-98 who in turn tried conciliation, but failed. It is pleaded Pagare is unemployed since his termination therefore the management bank be directed to reinstate him in service with full back wages .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2., MUMBAI .
PRESENT
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer REFERENCENo.CGIT-2/35 OF 2000
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF CANARA BANK
The General Manager, Canara Bank ,
Maker Towers ' E ' Wing, 14thFloor , Cuffe Parade , Mumbai -400 005. V/ s.
THEIR WORKMAN
3.Management Canara Bank resisted the claim of unlon by filing written statement (Exhibit - 11 ) contending that Pagare was not employed by the bank hence he cannot become member ofthe union , therefore , union has no locus standi to espouse his cause and consequently Pagare being not workman reference is not maintainable . It is averred that the cause of the year 1996 was espoused in the year 1998, consequently reference suffers from delay and laches . According to the bank , Pagare was engaged only for doing specific jobs as and when required by the bank , during the period 1-2-95 to 20-12-95 . He was not appointed by the bank nor he worked continuously more than 240 days therefore question of his termination does not arise . It is contended a policy for recruitment of sub - staff has been evolved and that to seek back door entry this claim has beenpreferred. It is averred that Pagare being not employed by the bank , employer- employee relationship does not exist and claim being devoid of substance be dismissed with costs in limine .
The General Secretary, Canara Bank Staff Union , P.B. No. 10051 , 268/70, Frere Road , Fort, Mumbai -400 001 .
APPEARANCES :
FOR THE EMPLOYER
: Mr. Santosh Das ,
Representative.
FOR THE WORKMAN : S/ Shri P.N. Subramanyan and G. M. V. Nayak , Representatives .
4. By Rejoinder (Exhibit - 13 ) union reiterated the recitals in the Statement of Claim denying the averments in the Written Statement . It is pleaded that under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , union can represent even a non member and since Pagare continuously worked from 1993 to 1996 is entitled to regularisation in the bank.
Mumbai , the 24th April , 2003
AWARD
TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No.L - 12011 /203 / 99 /IR( B - II ) dt . 25-5-2000 in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause ( d ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial
5.On the basis of rival pleadings ofthe parties issues wereframed vide Exhibit- 14 and in that context Pagare filed affidavit in lieu of Examination - in -Chief (Exhibit - 25 ) and thatGeneral Secretary of Canara Bank Staff Union Mr. Nayak also filed affidavit at ( Exhibi1-26) and union closed oral evidence vide purshis ( Exhibit - 27 ) . In rebuttal , Chief 4831
जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़14, 1925
भारत का राजपत्र :
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Manager Mr. Pai filed affidavit in lieu of Examination - in- Chief (Exhibit- 29 ) and management closed oral evidence vide purshis (Exhibit- 30) .
6. Union filed Written Submissions with copies of rulings (Exhibit-32/ 33 ) and the management Bank (vide Exhibit- 34/35) . On hearing the Learned Representatives for both sides , and perusing the record and the written submissions , I record my findings on the following issues for the reasons mentioned below :-
Findings
Issues
Does not survive .
caused, make the reference not maintainable . Mr. Subramanyan for the union appeared along with Mr. Nayak contended that in cases where delay is shown to exist the Tribunal/ Court dealing with the case can appropriately mould the relief. Mr. Nayak urged that the object of the statute is to ensure social justice to both employers and employee and to advance the progress of industry and that this piece of legislation is directing and regulating the service conditions of the workers . In this context, he submits , to ensure social justice delay can be condoned . He has relied on Ajaib Singh V/s . The Sirhind Co-operative Marketing cum Processing Service Society Ltd. & Anr . JT 1999 (3 ) SC 38. In Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. , V/ s . Prahlad Singh 2001 Supreme Court Cases (L& S) 239wherein Their Lordships of Apex Court observed:
1. Whether the management proves that Pagare is not a "workman ' as defined under Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act as contended in Para 1 (b) ?
No
2. Whether management proves that reference is not maintainable as con- tended in para l (c) of the Written Statement?
No
"Whether relief can be declined pa the ground of delay and laches depends on the facts and circumstances of each case . In this case the claim was made almost after a period of 13 years without an reasonable or justifying ground and there was nothing on record to explain this delay as held by the Tribunal . When the respondent did not make claim for 13 years without any justification and on merits also he had no case , the Tribunal did not rightly grant him any relief."
3. Whether Pagare proves thathe worked continu- ously for 240 days in the bank ?
Does not survive .
4. Whether management com- plied with the provisions ofsection 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act ?
In the case in hand , there is delay of 2½ years . On perusal of the documents filed with list (Exhibit - 18 ) it is seen Pagare had made representations on his oral termination by the letters dtd. 10-12-96 and 14-10-97. It is not that Pagare remained silent after the alleged termination . Therefore considering the facts on record in the light of object of statute on the count of 2½ years delay reference cannot be thrown away. In this view of the matter reference . is maintainable and Issue No.2 is answered accordingly .
Management bank's action of disconti- nuing Pagare is justified.
5. Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in terminating the services of Shri Rahul Sampat Pagare is justified ?
Asper order below.
6. What relief Shri Pagare is entitled to?
REASONS
8.The crucialpoint in the matter is whether Pagare worked continuously for more than 240 days and if he so worked, he was terminated without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . It is in the evidence ofPagare that he worked as peon at Cuffe Parade Branch ofCanara Bank from 1993 to 1996. In affidavit para 3 he has given details on the days he worked . From these details it is apparent that, Pagare did not work continuously. Infact, Pagare himself in cross - examination para 8 clearly admitted that he was never in continuous service of the bank which indicative to show that he did not work continuously in the bank. So far completion of240 days is concerned, according to Pagare he worked 522 days during the period 7-5-93.to 30-4-95 . Chief Manager of the bank Mr. Pai who was Senior Manager of Cuffe Parade Branch during the material period i.e. in the year 1992-95, in the beginning casually stated that Pagare did not work at all in thebank, but in cross - examination para 11 he had to admit that Pagare was engaged during the period 8-7-92 to 1-7-95 however according to him , he worked during that period total 15 days . It is settled legal position that onus lies upon 7.At the outset the Learned Representative for the bank Shri Das inviting attention to the clause para l (c ) of WrittenStatement (Exhibit- 11 ) submitted that accordingto Pagare he was orally terminated in May 1996 and that he had moved the A.L.C (C) on 3-12-98 i.e. after about 2½ years and that this delay being inordinate and unexplained the reference is not maintainable . Mr. Das contended only because no time limit is provided does not mean that at any point of time power can be exercised by making a stale dispute relying on the decision in Nedungadi Bank Ltd .. V/s . K.P. Madhavan Kutty 2000 1 CLR 671 (673 ) SC . He submitted that Their Lordships in Krishi Utpadhan Mandi Samiti V/s . Arvind Chaubey and Anr . 2003 SCC (L & S) 28 had reduced the back wages from the total claim of the workman in that case as delay of seven years was caused, therefore, he submits inordinate and unexplained delay as 4832
[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003 /ASADHA 14, 1925
the claimant to show that he had in fact worked for 240 days in a calendar year . As per the details given by workman inaffidavit para 3 , he had worked 87 days in the year 1993 ; 92days in the year 1994; 167 days in the year 1995 ; and 176 days in the year 1996. Thus workman has not completed 240 days in any calendar years referred to above .
question of his regularisation assuming he completed 240 days does not arise at all . Since Pagare was engaged without giving appointment letter and that he did not complete more than 240 days in a calendar year and that according to bank he worked as a coolie for few days and was paid charges accordingly, is not em any relief in the lit of the decisions referred to above much less the reinstatement and back wages . Consequently his claim being devoid of substance deserves to be dismissed . Issues are answered accordingly and hence the order :--
ORDER
9. Pagare admits that he had not applied for getting employment in the bank nor he was given appointment letter by the bank . According to him he was orally terminated thereby there is no appointment nor termination letter . Since Mr. Pai admitted that bank had engaged Pagare during 8-7-92 to 1-7-95 for not more than fifteen days total itself indicative to show that he was engaged by the bank however, he had not completed 240 days.
The action of the management of Canara Bank in discontinuing Shri Rahul Sampat Pagare is justified . S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून , 2003
का. आ. 1861.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 जुलाई, 2003 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय- 4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय- 5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध मध्य प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात् -
" देवास जिले का लोहार पिपलिया ग्राम " ।
10. Secretary of the Union Mr. Nayak vide affidavit (Exhibit- 26) thrown light on the banking rules and regulations . By Statement of Claim he has averred much on the banks recruitment policy also . He has , however, no personal knowledge on the days worked by Pagare , therefore , so far working days are concerned, Mr. Nayak's evidence is of no help to Mr. Pagare . Admittedly no notice nor retrenchment compensation was given to Pagare ; therefore , according to him his termination is illegal . When Pagarewas not in continuous service nor he had completed 240 days , compliance of provisions in connection with issuance of notice and retrenchment compensation under section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act does not arise .
[सं. एस-38013/22/03 - एस.एस.- 1 ] संयुक्ता राय , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2003 :
11. The Learned Representative for the union Mr. Subramanyan submitted that since Pagare worked as admitted by Chief Manager Mr. Pai during the period 8-7-92 to 1-7-95 , as per the circulars issued by the bank Pagare gets right of absorption , inviting attention to the banking rules and regulations /circulars in the light of the Bipartite Settlement of the year 1966. Their Lordships of Supreme Court in Mahatma Phule Agricultural University V/s . Zilla Sheth Kamgar Union 2001 SCC ( L& S ) 1180 ruled :
S.O. 1861. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st July , 2003 as the date on which the provisions ofChapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI (except sub - section (i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Madhya Pradesh namely :-
"Village Lohar Piplia in the District of Dewas . " [No. S- 38013 /22/03 - SS. - 1 ] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून , 2003
"Even though the workman may be working for a long period of time or more than 240 days would not acquire a permanent status to be absorbed as regular employees as for absorption as regular employee existence ofposts is mandatory and if no post exists then even though the workers may have worked for a long period of time they canriot be regularized or made permanent .
In the said Judgment pg . 1189 Their Lordships in connected case observed :
का. आ. 1862. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियां का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा 01 जुलाई , 2003 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय- 4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय- 5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध हरियाणा राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात् -
"By virtue of continuing for 240 days and more labourers in the said case would not acquire the permanent status to be absorbed as regular employees and thereby Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act would not be affected."
"जिला गुड़गांव के राजस्व ग्राम सरहौल हदबस्त संख्या-70 के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र " ।
[सं. एस-38013/23/03- एस.एस.- 1 ] संयुक्ता राय, अवर सचिव 12. In the case in hand , according to Mr.Das Representative for bank there never existed any vacancy during the period mentioned by Pagare and in the absence of vacancy in the light of decision referred to above , 4833
भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 5, 2003/आषाढ़ 14, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
निम्नलिखित प्रतिस्थापन किये जाते हैं :-
New Delhi , the 13th June, 2003
(क) क्रम सं. 15 पर अधिसूचित श्री डी. बी. नायक का पद उपनिदेशक खान सुरक्षा ( खनन) के स्थान पर उपनिदेशक खान सुरक्षा ( यात्रिंकी ) पढ़ा जाये ।
(ख ) क्रम सं. 19 पर अधिसूचित अधिकारी का नाम विनोद कुमार के स्थान पर वी विनोद कुमार पढा जाये । S.O. 1862.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st July, 2003 as the date on which the provisions ofChapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI (except Sub- section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Haryana namely :-
(ग) क्रम सं. 27 पर अधिसूचित श्री ए. दान का पद सहायक निदेशक खान सुरक्षा ( खनन ) के स्थान पर सहायक निदेशक खान सुरक्षा ( व्यवसायिक स्वास्थ्य) पढा जाये । "Areas comprising the revenue village of Sarhaul, HadBast No. 70, in the district of Gurgaon . "
[फा. सं. एस-29025/5/2002- आई.एस.एच.- II ] ब्रज मोहन, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2003 [No. S- 38013/23/03 - SS. I ] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2003
S.O. 1864. In S. O. 3822 published in Part- II , Section . 3( ii) of the Gazette of India dated December, 7, 2002 , the following substitutions are made :-
(a) The designation in respect of Shri D. B. Naik at No.15maybe read as " DDMS ( Mechanical) " inplace of " DDMS (Mining ) " .
(b) The name of the officer at No. 19 may be read as "V.Vinod Kumar " in place of " Vinod Kumar " .
का. आ. 1863.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 जुलाई , 2003 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय- 4(44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय- 5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध कर्नाटक राज्य केनिम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:-
(c) The designation in respect of Shri A. Dan at No. 27 may be read as " ADMS (OH ) " in place of"ADMS (Mining) " .
" जिला तथा ताऊ दवनगेरे होबली कसाबा के अन्तर्गत आने पाले राजस्व ग्राम कुन्दवडा तथा दोदावाती " ।
[F.No. S- 29025/5/2002- ISH. II ] BRAJ MOHAN , Under Secy .
१. एस-38013/21/03- एस.एस. - 1 ] संयुक्ता राय, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2003
नई दिल्ली, 18 जून , 2003
का. आ. 1865.- केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट है कि लोकहित में ऐसा अपेक्षित है कि लोह अयस्क खनन उद्योग में सेवाओं को जिसे औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि16 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है, उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए । S.O. 1863. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (3 ) of Section i of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st July, 2003 as the date on which the provisions ofChapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI (excepi Saberction ( 1) ofSection 76 and Sections 77 , 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Karnataka namely :-
अतः , अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों काप्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।
"Areas falling in the Revenue Village of Kundavada and Doddabathi , Hobli - Kasaba , Taluk and District Davanagere . "
[No. S- 38013 /21 /03 - SS . I ]
[फा. सं. एस-11017/13/97- आई.आर. ( पी.एल. ) ] जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.
New Delhi , the 18th June , 2003 नई दिल्ली, 13 जून , 2003
S.O. 1865.- Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest required that the services in the Iron ore Mining Industry which is covered by item का. आ. 1864.- भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II , खण्ड 3 ( ii ) में 7 दिसम्बर, 2002 को प्रकाशित अधिसूचना का. आ. 3822 में 4834
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 5 , 2003/ASADHA 14, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 16 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , should be declared to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act .
Disputes Act, 1947, the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act for a period ofsix months.
[No. S - 11017/13 /97 - IR (PL) ] Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - clause ( vi ) of clause (n ) of section 2 of the Industrial
J. P. PATI , Jt . Secy .
1 Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.