REGD. No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री संग्डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05
भारतको राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 41 ]
नई दिल्ली, अक्तूबर 5 अक्तूबर 11 , 2003 , शनिवार/आश्विन13-आश्विन19, 1925 NEW DELHI , OCTOBER 5- OCTOBER 11 , 2003 , SATURDAY/ASVINA 13- ASVINA 19 , 1925 No. 41]
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II-खण्ड 3- उप-खण्ड (ii) PART II-Section 3 Sub- section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
मंत्रिमंडल सचिवालय
की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2003
करती है ।
[सं. 228/76/2003-डी.एस.पी.ई.] शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव
CABINET SECRETARIAT
New Delhi , the 29th September , 2003
S.O. 2860. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka, vide Notification No. HD 154 PCR 2003 dated 7-8-2003 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation ofoffences against Shri K. Murali Krishna, Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, Divisional Office , Ist Floor, Arya Ediga Hostel Complex, Double Road, Bellary, (2) Dr. Koteshwar Rao the then Administrative Officer, Divisional Office Bellary at present Assistant Manager, NIAC under Section 120 -B का०आ ० 2860.- केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी-154 पीसीआर 2003 दिनांक 07-08-2003 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से श्री के. मुरली कृष्ण, प्रभागीय प्रबन्धक, न्यूइंडिया एश्यूरेंस कम्पनी लिमिटेड, प्रभागीय कार्यालय , प्रथम तल, आर्य इदिगा हॉसटल कॉम्पलैक्स, डबल रोड, बेलारी , ( 2 ) डा. कोटेश्वर राव, तत्कालीन प्रशासन अधिकारी , प्रभागीय कार्यालय, बेलारी इस समय सहायक प्रबंधक, एनआईएसी के विरुद्ध भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 120 - बी सपठित धारा 420 और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49) कीधारा 13 (2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( डी ) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अर्थवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध और अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों
2803 GI/ 2003
(6629) 6630
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
read with 420 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and Section 13 (2) read with 13 ( 1 ) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988 ) and attempts, abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offence mentioned above and any other offence and offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .
[No. 228/76/2003 -DSPE] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ० 2861.- केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 172 पीसीआर 2003दिनांक 29-08-2003 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति सेविंग कमांडर केशव सैमुअल तिवारी ( सेवानिवृत्त ) , अपर महाप्रबंधक, फ्लाइट आप्रेशन्श, एयरक्राफ्ट डिवीजन, एचएएल, बंगलौर एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोकसेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 (1860का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 420 , 468 और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( डी) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध और अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं. 228/86/2003 - डी.एस.पी.ई. ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th September, 2003 S.O. 2861. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka, vide Notification No. HD 172 PCR 2003 dated 29-8-2003 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation ofoffences against Wg. Cdr . Keshab Samuel Tewari ( Retd. ) , Additional General Manager , Flight Operations , Air Craft Division, HAL, Bangalore and any other public servants or persons under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) and Section 13 ( 2 ) read with 13 ( 1 ) ( d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988 ) and attempts, abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offence mentioned above and any other offence and offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[No. 228/86/2003 -DSPE]
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यविभाग )
नईदिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ० 2862.- उस्मानिया विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
और डा. सुचित्रा रेड्डी, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से 'पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः अब उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. सुचित्रा रेड्डी चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से एक वर्ष की अवधि तक; अथवा
(ख ) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा. सचित्रा रेड्डी, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहती हैं , जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी।
[सं. वी-11016/1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति- I ) ]
पी. जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department ofHealth)
New Delhi , the 24th September , 2003
S.O. 2862. Whereas medical qualification MBBS grantedby University of Osmania is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose ofthe Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of said Act ;
And Whereas Dr. Suchitha Reddy who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur (A.P. ) , for the charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Suchitha Reddy in India shall be limited to:-
(a) a period of one year from the date of issue of this notification; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Suchitha Reddy is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/1/2003 -ME(Policy - I) ] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.
6631 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
(आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
का०आ० 2863.- श्रीलंका विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत , एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. कंजीवाराम श्री हरी द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय कीअवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधितक; अथवा
और डा. श्रीराम इन्द्र, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर (आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा. कंजीवाराम श्री हरी , श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं , जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
अतः , अब , उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. श्रीराम इन्द्र द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
[सं. वी-11016/ 1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ] (क) दिनांक 31-12-2003 तक की अवधि तक, अथवा
पी. जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा. श्री राम इन्द्र, श्री सत्य
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003 (ख) साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी।
[सं. वी-11016/1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
S.O. 2864. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by Madras University is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act; पी. जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 24th September , 2003
And, Whereas , Dr. Conjecvaram Sree Hari who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
S.O. 2863. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by University of Sri Lanka is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act;
Now, theretore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Conjeevaram Sree Hari in India shall be limited to:---
And, Whereas, Dr. Sriram Indra who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
(a) a period of six months front the date of issue of thisnotification; or
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Sriram Indra in India shall be limited to:-
(b) the period during which Dr. Conjeevaram Sree Hariisattached, Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ), whichever is shorter.
(a) a period ofup to 31-12-2003; or
[No.V- 11016/1 /2003 -ME (Policy- 1) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.
नईदिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर , 2003 (b) the period during which Dr. Sriram Indra is attacthed to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal , Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter.
[No. V - 11016/ 1 /2003 -ME(Policy- I) ] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.
का०आ ० 2865.-मैसूर विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद्अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत , एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
और डा. कामथ रविशंकर कासरागोडे, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
का०आ० 2864.- मद्रास विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट और डा. कंजीवाराम श्री हरी, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है , श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर 6632
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
करती है कि भारत में डा. कामथ रविशंकर कासरागोड़े द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(क) इस अधिनियम के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधितक; अथवा
(ख ) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा. कामथ रविशंकर कासरागोडे, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं.वी-11016/1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति- I ) ]
पी. जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 24th September, 2003 S.O. 2865. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted byMysore University is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of said Act ;
And, Whereas, Dr. Kamath Ravishankar Kasaragode whopossess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Kamath Ravishankar Kasaragode in Indian shall be limited to:-
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification ; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Kamath Ravishankar Kasaragode is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal, Prashanthi Nilayam , AnantapurDistt. (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter.
[No. V- 11016/ 1/2003 -ME(Policy-I) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.
नईदिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर , 2003
का०आ ० 2866.- बम्बई विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत , एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
और डा. कदावा श्रीनाथ सतीश, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभके लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. कदावा श्रीनाथ सतीश द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
( क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक; अथवा
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] (ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा. कदावा श्रीनाथ सतीश , श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं , जो भी कम हो, परिसीमितहोगी ।
[सं.वी-11016/1/2003-एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
पी. जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003 S.O. 2866. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by Bombay University of is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of said Act; And Whereas Dr. Kadaba Srinath Satish who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Kadaba Srinath Satish in Indian shall be limitedto:
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification ; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Kadaba Srinath Satish attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/ 1 /2003 -ME (Policy -I ) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ० 2867.- गुजरात विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत , एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
और डा. प्रवीण चन्द्र चुनीलाल पटेल, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है , श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिसूचना की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. प्रवीण चन्द्र चुनीलाल पटेल द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधितक; अथवा
(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा. प्रवीण चन्द्र चुनीलाल पटेल, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहे है , जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं. वी -11016/1 /2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ] पी. जी. कलाधरन , अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
6633
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
NewDelhi , the 24th September , 2003 S.O. 2867. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by Gujarat University is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act; And Whereas Dr. Pravinchandra Chunilal Patel who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt. (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub -section ( 1 ) ofthe Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Pravinchandra Chunilal Patel in India shall be limited to:-
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification ; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Pravinchandra Chunilal Patel is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal, Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt. (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter.
[No. V- 11016/ 1 /2003-ME (Policy -1) ] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ० 2868.- उस्मानिया विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
और डां. अक्कापेड्डी विजय गोपाल , जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है , श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न किनिजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. अक्कापेड्डी विजय गोपाल द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधितक; अथवा
(ख ) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा. अक्कापेड्डीविजय गोपाल , श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी।
[सं. वी-11016/1 /2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
पी. जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003 S.O. 2868. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by Osmania University is a rècognised medical qualification for the purpose ofthe Indian Medical Council Act, 1956( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of said Act ;
And Whereas Dr. Akkapeddi Vijay Gopal who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt. (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Akkapeddi Vijay Gopal in India shall be limitedto:-
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of thisnotification; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Akkapeddi Vijay Gopal is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal, Prashanthi Nilayam , AnantapurDistt. (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter.
[No. V- 11016/ 1 /2003 -ME (Policy -1) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ० 2869.- आन्ध्र विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत , एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
और डॉ. नर्रा नागा प्रसूनम्बा, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डां. नर्रा नागा प्रसूनम्बा द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय कीअवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधितक; अथवा
(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा. नर्रा नागा प्रसूनम्बा, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं. वी-11016/1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति -1 ) ] पी. जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 24th September, 2003 S.O. 2869.-Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by Andhra University is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of said Act ;
6634
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
And whereas Dr. Narra Naga Prasunamba who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain:
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice ofmedicine by Dr. Narra Naga Prasunamba in India shall be limited to :--
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of thisnotification; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Narra Naga Prasuhamba is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal, Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/ 1 /2003 -ME (Policy-I) ] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ० 2870.- राजस्थान विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत , एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
और सिंगापुर नागरिक डॉ. संगीता तनेजा, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है , रूंगटा अस्पताल, मालवीय नगर, जयपुर से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डॉ. संगीता तनेजा द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक; अथवा
(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डॉ. संगीता तनेजा, रूंगटा अस्पताल, मालवीय नगर, जयपुर से संलग्न रहती है , जो भी कम हो, मरिसीमित होगी ।
[सं. वी-11016/1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
पी. जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003 S.O. 2870-Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted byUniversity of Rajasthan is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act; And Whereas Dr. Sangeeta Taneja , Singaporan National, who possess the said qualification is attached to RungtaHospital Malviya Nagar, Jaipur for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain:
Now , therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act , the
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Sangeeta Taneja in India shall be limited to :
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Sangeeta Taneja is attached to Rungta Hospital , Malviya Nagar , Jaipur, whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/1/2003 -ME (Policy- I) ] P.G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली , 24 सितम्बर , 2003
का०आ० 2871.- मद्रास विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
और डॉ. पेजावर एम. राव , जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशास्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आंध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजीलाभ के लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डॉ. पेजावर एम . राव, द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय कीअवधि:-
(क) इस अधिनियम के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक; अथवा
(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डॉ. पेजावर एम. राव, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आंध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं.वी-11016/1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
पी. जी. कलाधरन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003 S.O. 2871. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by Madras University is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act ;
And Whereas Dr. Pejawar M. Rao who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain :
Now , therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Pejawar M. Rao in India shall be limited to :-
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification : or 6635 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
(b) the period during which Dr. Pejawar M. Rao is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ), whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/1 /2003 -ME(Policy-I) ]
का०आ ० 2873.- मद्रास विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
और डा ० जोन्नलागडा एस ० सरोजिनी , जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न किनिजी लाभ के लिए;
का०आ ० 2872.- लेलैण्ड स्टेनफोर्ड जूनियर यूनिवर्सिटी द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्तअधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) केखंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा० जोन्नलागडा एस ० सरोजिनी द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
और डा ० सुजोया डे, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साईं जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक; अथवा
अतः अब उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा० सुजोया डे द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा ० जोन्नलागडा एस सरोजिनी, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं. वी-11016/1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति -1 ) ] (क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक, अथवा
पी०जी० कलाधरन अंवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003 (ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा० सुजोया डे, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहती हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं. वी-11016/1/2003- एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
पी०जी० कलाधरन अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003
S.O. 2873. Whereas medical qualification MBBS . granted by University of Madras is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act ; And Whereas Dr. Jonnalagada S. Sarojini who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur (A.Ρ. ), for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
S.O. 2872 .--Whereas medical qualification M.D. granted by Leland Stanford Junior University is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act . 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of sub-section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Jonnalagada S. Sarojini in India shall be limitedto:-
And Whereas Dr. Sujoya Dey who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain:
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification; or
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Sujoya Dey in India shall be limited to :-
(b) the period during wlich Dr. Jonnalagada S. Sarojini is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P.) , whichever is shorter .
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification ; or
[No. V- 110 16/1/2003 - ME(Policy- I)] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
(b) the period during which Dr. Sujoya Dey is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal , Prashanthi Nilayam. Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter.
[No. V- 11016/1 /2003 -ME(Policy -I)]
का०आ० 2874.- नागार्जुन विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.
6636
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] और डा ० श्यामल के० कुमार, जिनके पास उपर्युक्तअर्हता है, श्री सत्य साईं जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः, अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा० वेलांकी नन्द कुमार बाबू, द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक, अथवा
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) केखंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा० श्यामल के ० कुमार द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय कीअवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक; अथवा
(ख ) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा० वेलांकी नन्द कुमार बाबू, श्री सत्य साईं जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं. वी-11016/1/2003 -एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
पी ०जी० कलाधरन , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003 (ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा० श्यामल के ० कुमार, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहती हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं. वी-11016/1/2003- एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
पी०जी० कलाधरन , अवर सचिव
S.O. 2875. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by Andhra University is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act ;
NewDelhi , the 24th September, 2003
S.O. 2874. Whereas medical qualification MBBS grantedby Nagarjuna University is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act ;
And Whereas Dr. Vellanki Nanda Kumar Babu who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur (А.Р. ), for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
And Whereas Dr. Shyamala K. Kumar who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause (c) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Vellanki Nanda Kumar Babu in India shall be limited to:-
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification ; or
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause (c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Shyamala K. Kumar in India shall be limited to:
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of thisnotification ; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Vellanki Nanda Kumar Babu is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt. (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/1/2003 - ME(Policy- I) ] (b) the period during which Dr. Shyamala K. Kumar is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hosiptal , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter .
P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
[No. V- 11016/1/2003 - ME(Policy- I) ] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ ० 2876.- डा० जॉन्स हापकिन्स स्कूल आफॅ मेडिसिन द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत , एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
का०आ ० 2875.- आन्ध्र विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
7
और डा० मोहित कृष्ण भटनागर, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साईं जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर (आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
और डा० वेलांकी नन्द कुमार बाबू, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साईं जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
6637 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
करती है कि भारत में डा ० मोहित कृष्ण भटनागर द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधितक, अथवा
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक, अथवा
(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा० चन्द्रदास केनाग्रेटनम, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी।
( ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा० मोहित कृष्ण भटनागर, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं , जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं. वी-11016/1 /2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ] पी०जी० कलाधरन , अवर सचिव [ सं. वी -11016/1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
New Delhi, the 24th September, 2003 पी०जी० कलाधरन , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003
S.O. 2877. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by University of Ceylon is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act; S.O. 2876. Whereas medical qualification M.D. granted by Johns Hopkins School of Medicine is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act ;
And whereas Dr. Chandradas Canagaretnane who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital, Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ), for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
And whereas Dr. Mohit Krishan Bhatnagar who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital, Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur (AP. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c ) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice ofmedicine by Dr. Chandradas Canagaretnam in India shall be limited to :-
(a) aperiod of six months from the date of issue of this notification ; or
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Mohit Krishan Bhatnagar in India shall be limited to :-
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification ; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Chandradas Canagaretnam is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt. ( A.P. ) , whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/ 1 /2003 -ME(Policy- I) ] (b) the period during which Dr. Mohit Krishan Bhatnagar is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital, Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter.
P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर , 2003
[No. V- 11016/ 1 /2003-ME (Policy - I) ] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy .
नईदिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ ० 2878.- केरल विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
का ०आ ० 2877.-सिलोन विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत , एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
और डा० रेखा पिल्लै, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है , श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ केलिए;
और डा० चन्द्रदास केनाग्रेटनम, जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. रेखा पिल्लै द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
अतः, अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा० चन्द्रदास केनाग्रेटनम द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय कीअवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से एक वर्ष की अवधि तक, अथवा
2803 G1 / 03-2 6638
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा० रेखा पिल्लै, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति मिलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश) से संलग्न रहती हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
[सं. वी-11016/1 /2003 - एम ई ( नीति -1 ) ]. पी०जी० कलाधरन, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003 S.O. 2878. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by University of Kerala is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act; And whereas Dr. Rekha Pillai who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause (c) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice ofmedicine by Dr. Rekha Pillai in India shall be limitedto:-
(a) a period of one year from the date of issue of thisnotification ; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Rekha Pillai is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter.
[No. V- 11016/1/2003 -ME(Policy - I) ]
P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर , 2003
का०आ० 2879.-सिलोन विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
और डा ० कृष्णादासन मंगलेश्वरी , जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल , प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर (आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूत कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा० कृष्णादासन मंगलेश्वरी द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से एक वर्ष की अवधि तक, अथवा
(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा० कृष्णादासन मंगलेश्वरी , श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहती हैं , जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी।
[ सं. वी-11016/1 /2003- एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ] पी०जी० कलाधरन, अवर सचिव
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] NewDelhi , the 24th September, 2003
S.O. 2879.- Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by University of Ceylon is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act; And whereas Dr. Krishnadasan Mangaleshwari who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur (A.P. ) , for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain:
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause (c) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Krishnadasan Mangaleshwari in India shall be limited to :-
(a) a period of one year from the date of issue of this notification ; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Krishnadasan Mangaleshwari is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/1 /2003 -ME(Policy- I)] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ ० 2880.- काकटिया विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हप्ता है ;
और डा० कोलिसेट्टी राजालिंगम , जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
अतः , अब, उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) केखंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा ० कोलिसेट्टी राजालिंगम द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधितक; अथवा
(ख ) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा० कोलिसेट्टी राजालिंगम, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम , अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं, जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।
२ [सं. वी-11016/ 1/2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ] पी.जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003
S.O. 2880. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by Kakatiya University is a recognised medical [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
6639 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) under Section 14 ofthe said Act;
And whereas Dr. Vinita Gupta who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt. ( A.P. ) for the purpose ofcharitable work and not for personal gain;
And Whereas Dr. Kolisetti Rajalingam who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt (A.P. ) for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause (c) of sub-section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of metlicine by Dr. Vinita Gupta in India shall be limitedto:-
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification ; or
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( c) of sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Kolisetti Rajalingam in India shall be limited to:-
(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Vinita Gupta is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital, Prashanthi Nilayam, Anantapur Distt . (A.P. ) , whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/ 1/2003 -ME(Policy- 1) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.
(b) the period during which Dr. Kolisetti Rajalingam is attached to Sri Sathya Sai General Hospital , Prashanthi Nilayam , Anantapur Distt. (A.P. ), whichever is shorter.
पर्यटन और संस्कृति मंत्रालय (संस्कृतिविभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2003 [No. V- 11016/ 1/2003 - ME(Policy-1) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ ० 2881.- कर्नाटक विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एमबीबीएस चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत, एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
का०आ ० 2882.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम -4 के अनुसरण में पर्यटन और संस्कृति मंत्रालय , संस्कृति विभाग के अधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालय जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दीका कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है :-
और डा० विनिता गुप्ता , जिनके पास उपर्युक्त अर्हता है , श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संलग्न हैं और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;
उप अधीक्षण पुरातत्वविद, भारतीय पुरातत्व सर्वेक्षण, लघु मंडल, शिवालिक खंड, केन्दीय सरकार कार्यालय परिसर, शिमला-171001
[सं. 1-1/2002-हिन्दी] अतः अब उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा० विनिता गुप्ता द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-
वाई. एस. रावत, उप निदेशक (राजभाषा) (क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक; अथवा
MINISTRY OF TOURISM AND CULTURE (Department of Culture)
NewDelhi , the 30th September, 2003 (ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा० विनिता गुप्ता, श्री सत्य साई जनरल अस्पताल, प्रशान्ति निलायम, अनन्तपुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से संलग्न रहते हैं , जो भी कम हो , परिसीमित होगी ।
S.O. 2882.- In pursuance of Sub - rule (4) of Rule 10 ofthe Official Language ( Use for Official purpose of the Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the Ministry of Tourism & Culture, Department of Culture, more than 80 % staff of which have acquired a working knowledge of Hindi .
[सं. वी-11016/1 /2003 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ] पी.जी. कलाधरन, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2003
The Dy. Superintending Archaeologist , Archaeological Survey of India Mini Circle, S-Block, C.G.O. Complex. Shimla- 171001 (H.P. )
No. 1-1/2002-Hindi ] S.O. 2881. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by Karnatak University is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 ofthe said Act ;
Y.S. RAWAT, Dy. Director (OL) [PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINĄ 19, 1925
6640
कोयला मंत्रालय
शुद्धि-पत्र
नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ० 2883.- भारत के राजपत्र असाधारण , भाग II , खंड-3, उपखंड ( ii ) में तारीख 14 जुलाई, 2003 के पृष्ठ क्रमांक 1 से 6 पर प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 798 ( अ ) तारीख 14 जुलाई, 2003 में -
पृष्ठ क्रमांक 2पर
1. अनुसूची में- "पौनी विस्तार विवृत परियोजना " कोसंशोधित कर " पौनी विस्तारण विवृत परियोजना"
" बल्लारपुर क्षेत्र" पढ़ा जाए ।
2. ग्राम का नाम स्तंभ में क्रम संख्या 1 में-
" गोरवी" को संशोधित कर " गोवरी " पढ़ा जाए तथा जहां कहीं भी यह शब्द प्रयुक्त हुआ हो उसे संशोधित कर " गोवरी " पढ़ा जाए । पृष्ठक्रमांक 3 पर
1. सीमा वर्णन में रेखा ग - घ की तीसरी पंक्ति में " ख्नम " को संशोधित कर " खनन " पढ़ा जाए ।
2. रेखा " घ-ह" को संशोधित कर " घ- ङ" पढ़ा जाए और " ड़ " पर मिलती है को संशोधित कर बिन्दु " ङ" पर मिलती है पढ़ा जाए । 3. रेखा " ड-च-छ- ज" को संशोधित कर " ङ -च - छ - ज " पढ़ा जाए ।
[फा. सं. 43015/7/2001- पी.आर.आई.डब्ल्यू. ]
संजय बहादुर, निदेशक उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
(खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर, 2003
का०आ० 2884.-केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4 ) केअनुसरण में उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय ( खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण विभाग ) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन भारतीय खाद्य निगम के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को अधिसूचित करती है :-
1. भारतीय खाद्य निगम,
जिला कार्यालय ,
बोरीवली पूर्व
मुम्बई-400066
[सं. ई-11011 /1/2001-हिन्दी]
रजनी राजदान, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD & PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION (Department of Food & Public Distribution) NewDelhi , the 16th September, 2003
S.O. 2884.-In pursuance of Sub -rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purpose of the Union) Rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following office of Food Corporation of India under the administrative control of theMinistry of Consumer Affairs , Food & Public Distribution (Deptt. of Food & Public Distribution), whereof morethan 80% of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :-
1. Food Corporation of India, DistrictOffice,
Borivali (East), Mumbai -400066
[No. E- 11011/1 /2001 -Hindi ]
RAJNI RAZDAN, Jt . Secy.
6641 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2885.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और भाप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब, केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वेटेक ( इंडिया) , 1496713 , फूलपुरा , चारबुज, किरन स्टोर के सामने, ओल्ड मधुपुरा , अहमदाबाद -380014 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डब्ल्यूटी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " बेटेक (इंडिया ) " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/ 2003/253 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित टाइप तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द कीगई है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिस से अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगें जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 5 ग्रा . या उसके अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10के के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 164)/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6642
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 / ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
(Department of ConsumerAffairs)
NewDelhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2885.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic , (Table type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "WT " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name "WEITECH ( INDIA) " ( herein referred to as the model manufactured by M/s . Weightech ( India), 1496/13 , Phulpura, Opp . Charbuj Kirna Store , Old Madhupura, Ahmedabad -380014 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09//2003/253;
σ The said model (see the figure given ) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacityof 30 kg , minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ' e' is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices .
1
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of the said Section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2g and with the number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2× 10k , or 5 × 10k , K being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and withthe same materials with which, the approved Model have been manufactured .
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 164)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6643 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2886.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नंदी एग्रीकल्चरल इंडस्ट्रीज, भूचोमंडी, भटिंडा, पंजाब द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " डी आई सी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नंदी " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/137 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित टाइप तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द कीगई है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिस से अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगें और 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज मेंसत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उसके अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10के के है जो के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्यहै ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (96 ) /2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6644
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II- SBC. 3 (ii) ]
NewDelhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2886.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of model of the self- indicating, non - automatic, (Table type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "DIC" series of High accuracy (Accuracy class II ) and with brand name "NANDI" ( herein referred to as the Model ), manufactured by M/s. Nandi Agricultural Industries , Bhuchomandi , Bhatinda, Punjab and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09//2003/136;
The said model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 10 kg minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval ( e) is Ig. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
practices. Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing is done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, and performace of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2× 10 %, or 5 × 10%, K being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model have been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (96)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6645 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत को राजपत्र : अमतूबर 11 , 2003/ आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2887.- केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चेत् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आंकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः, अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धीरा 30 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मंदी एग्रीकल्चरल इंडस्ट्रीज, भूचोमंडी, भटिंडा, पंजाब द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( वथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डी आर सी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मंदी " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/ 09/ 2003 / 136 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित टाइप तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्थापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का माम 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द कीगई है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उस सिद्धान्त डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिस से अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 5 ग्रा. या उसके अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से और 3000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के , 2 × 10के या 5× 10के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (96 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2803 G1 /03-3 6646
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2887. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self-indicating , non - automatic, (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " DIC" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with Bränd name "NANDI " (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s : Nandi Agricultural Industries, Bhuchomandi , Bhatinda, Punjab and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 137 ;
ד
3 The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 100 kg. and minimum capacity of200g. The verification scale interval ' e ' is 10g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply;
practices. Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity from 50kg . and upto 3000kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k , K being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model have been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 ( 96)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology
:
6647 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, ३ अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2888.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अल्फा डिजिटल सिस्टम , 13 , अभिलाषा सोसाइटी, न्यू शामा रोड, बडौदा-390008 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ई डी पी" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " आदित " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 / 283 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणप्रत्र प्रकाशित करती है ;
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित टाइप तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि. ग्रा. औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तशल ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द कीगई है ।
▼
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिस से अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यर्थाता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 300 कि. ग्रा. की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के , 2 × 10के या 5 × 10के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (146 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6648
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11, 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
NewDelhi, the 3rd October , 2003
S. O. 2888.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self - indicating , non- automatic , (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " ADP" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name " ADIT" (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s , Alpha Digital System, 13 , Abhilasha Society, New SamaRoad, Baroda- 390008 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/283 ;
The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 60 kg. and minimum capacity of200g . The verification scale interval ' e ' is 10g. It has a tare devicewith a100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternate current power supply ;
R practices. Sealing : In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent opening machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of the said Section , the Central Governmenthereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging from 50 kg . to 300 kg. and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10%, 2×10 , or 5× 10 , K being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer inaccordance with the same principle , design accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21( 146)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6649 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2889.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एल डी जी प्रा. लि. , 54 , सुयोग इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , लाल बहादुर शास्त्री मार्ग, पिखरोहोली ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई -400083 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डी आर एल " श्रृंखला के.स्वतः सूचक , अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ईडीएस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003 / 139 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित टाइप का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द कीगई है ।
00 Kg . Min . 4000 € 200
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिस से अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) और 50 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल एन सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. से 300 कि. ग्राम . तक की रेंज के अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (43 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6650
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
NewDelhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S. O. 2889. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non - automatic, (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " DRL " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name " EDS " ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s. EL- Digi Pvt. Ltd. , 54, Suyog Industrial Estate, Lal Bahadur Shastri Marg, Vikhroholi (West ) Mumbai-400083 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 // 2003/139;
The said Model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 100 kg . and minimum capacity of 400g . The verification scale interval ' e ' is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
R practices. Sealing In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent the opening machine for fradulent
100kg Min. 4009/2
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging from 50kg to 300kg and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 and with number of verification scale interval ' n' in the range of500 to 10,000 for e' value of50g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (43)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6651 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2890.- केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एल डी जी प्रा. लि. , 54, सुयोग इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, लाल बहादुर शास्त्री मार्ग , पिखरोहोली ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई -400083 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ई डी एस डब्ल्यूबी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन संहित तोलन उपकरण ( बहुभार सेल प्रकार ) सहित वे ब्रिज के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ईडीएस " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/140 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी भार सेल प्रकार बहुभार सहित ( वे ब्रिज ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द की गई है ।
BOSWE
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उस सिद्धान्त डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिस से अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगें और 5 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल एन सहित 5 टन के ऊपर और 50 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (43 ) /2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6652
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi, the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2890. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of the self- indicating, non -automatic , (Weigh bridge withmulti load cell type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "EDSWB" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) andwith brand name " EDS " ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . EL -Digi Pvt. Ltd. , 34, Suyog Industrial Estate, Lal Bahadur Shastri Marg, Vikhroholi (West ) Mumbai -400083 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 140;
The said Model (see the figure given below) is a ( Weigh bridge with multi load type strain gauge load cell). weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of40 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval 'e' is 5 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode display indicates theweighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50- Hertz alternate current power supply;
R Sealing In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent the opening of machine for fradulent practices.
Further , in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the other weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performace of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 50 tonne and with number ofverification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg. or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10%, 2× 10f , or 5 × 10%, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (43 )/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6653
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2891.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स दि बाम्बे वर्मा ट्रेडिंग कारपोरेशन लि. , प्लाट नं. 304, न्यू जी आई डी सी गुण्डालाव , वल्साड -396035 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यर्थाथता ( यर्थाथता वर्ग II ) वाले " एफ एक्स 300 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एफ्कोसेट" है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003 /257 संमनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ;
उक्तमॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक वैद्युत चुम्बकीय बल प्रतिकर के सिद्धांत पर आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 310 ग्रा...और असूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धर्धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड एल ई डी प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
,' जाती है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की JEWELLERYBALACES
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उस सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तकके " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल संख्या संहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के , 2 × 10के या 5 × 10के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू.एम . 21 ( 303 )/2001 ]
पी.ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2803 G1/03-4 6654
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2891. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measuгея (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferted by Sub - section (7 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the self- indicating, non -automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "FX300a " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class II) and with brand name " AFCOSET" (hereinreferred to as the Model ) , manufactured byM/s. The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd. , Plot No. 304, New G.I.D.C. , Gundalav, Valsad- 396035 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /257;
The saidModel (see figure ) is a weighing instruments based on electromagnetic force compensation.inciple with a maximum capacity of 310 g and minimum capacity of 200 mg. The verification scale interval ' e ' is 10 mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the thing result. The instruments operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;
R
!
In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing should also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for faudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this dertificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similarmake, accuracy and performace of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50000 for ' e' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 %, or 5 × 10%, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (303)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6655 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
नईदिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2892.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स दि बाम्बे वर्मा ट्रेडिंग कारपोरेशन लि. , प्लाट नं. 304, न्यू जी आई डी सी गुण्डालाव , बल्साङ्ग -396035 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यर्थाथता ( यर्थाथता वर्ग II ) वाले " सी जे 20009 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एफ्कोसेट " हैं ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/258 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक वैद्युत चुम्बकीय बल प्रतिकर के सिद्धांत पर आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2100 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन मरिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की जाती है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तौलन उपकरण भी हो। जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एक) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या.उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1×90के 2×10के या 5 × 10के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू.एम. 21 ( 303 ) / 2001 ]
पी.ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] 6656
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S.O. 2892. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the self- indicating , non -automatic ( Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CJ 20009" series of high accuracy (Accuracy class II ) and with brand name "AFCOSET " (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd. , Plot No. 304 , New G.I.D.C. , Gundalva , Valsad - 396035 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2003/258 ;
The said Model ( see figure ) is a weighing instruments based on electromagnetic force compensation principle with a maximum capacity of 2100g and minimum capacity of 5g . The verification scale interval ' e ' is 100 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 Volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;
Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing should also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to 50000 for ' e' value 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x10 % , or 5x10 %, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (303)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6657 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2893.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एवरी इंडिया लिमिटेड, प्लाट सं. 50-54 , सेक्टर 25 , वल्लभगढ़ -121004 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित " एल एफ " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित , अंकक सूचन भरण मशीन ( भार सेल आधारित ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एवरी " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2002/ 130 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है !
यह मॉडल एक द्रव क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श सहित स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( भार सेल आधारित ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि.ग्रा. या समतुल्य मात्रा है । इसकी अधिकतम भरण दर 360 प्रति घंटा है । मशीन मिनरल वाटर, दुग्ध, रसायन, तेल आदि मुक्त बहाव के गैर लसीले द्रववं उत्पादों के भरण के लिए डिजाइन की गई है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (40 )/2001 ] :
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6658
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II- SEC. 3( 11) ]
New Delhi, the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2893. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe model of automatic filling machine ( load cellbased)with digital indication of 'LF ' series with brand name " AVERY" ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured byM/s . Avery India Ltd. Plot No. 50-59 , Sector -25 , Ballabhgarh- 121004, Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09//2002/ 130;
7 TheModel is an automatic filling machine ( load cell based) with liquid crystal display. Its maximum capacity is 500 Kg. and minimum capacity is 5kg. or equivalent volume. It has a maximum fill rate of 360 fills per hour. The machine is designed for filling free flowing non -viscous liquid products like mineral water, milk, chemicals, oil and the like. It operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.
[F. No. WM- 21 (40)/2001]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6659 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आस्विन19 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2894.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब, केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सुपर स्केल, 550/4 , नगर निगम के सामने, दानपीठ शहर, अहमदाबाद -380001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस टी" श्रृंखला के स्क्तः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंर्कक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सुपर स्केल" है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2003/ 102 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. सहित तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन , शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1×10के, 2 × 10के यां 5 × 10के के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 78 ) /2000 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6660
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S.O. 2894.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non - automatic, ( Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " ST" series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " SUPER SCALE " (herein referred to as the Model ), manufactured by M/ s . Super Scale, 550/4, Opp. Municipal Corporation, City Danpith, Ahmedabad- 380001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 102;
The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge typed based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 10 Kg and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval ' e ' is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on230 volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing: In addition to sealing the satmping plate sealing is done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with number ofverification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and withsame materials with which, the approved Model have been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (78 )/ 2000 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6661 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली , 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2895.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसेप्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मामक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टेक्नो स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, 47, श्री सोमनाथ सोसाइटी , अहमदाबाद-380013 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टी एम एस " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , इलेक्ट्रानिक, सदृशसूचक सहित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज - स्टील यार्ड प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टैक्नो " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2003 / 261 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक यांत्रिक लीवर आधारित सदृशसूचक मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वे ब्रिज स्टील यार्ड प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 5 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन के उपर 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10के के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (104)/2002]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2803 G1/03-5 6662
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 / ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2895 Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of, non- automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge- Steel yard type) with analogue indication ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III ) and " TMS " series with brand name "Techno " , manufactured by M/s . Techno Scale Industries, 47, Shree Somnath Society, Ahmedabad - 380013 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/261;
The said Model is a mechanical lever based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Steelyard type) with analogue indication of maximum capacity 30 tonne, minimum capacity 100kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 5kg .
Gauranteed for Accuracy Sensitivity Sura
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section , 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonnie and with number ofverification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5kg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 %, or 5x10 " , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model have been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 104)/ 2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6663 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/ आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2896.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स यूनीक इन्स्ट्रूमेन्टस , 213, राजरतन इण्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , एस एन डी टी महिला काजेल के सामने, निकट अमेरिकन स्प्रिंग मलाद (पश्चिमी ) मुंबई- 400064 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " यू डब्लूबी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित, अंकन सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( बहुभार सेल टाइप वे ब्रिज प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूनिक इन्स्ट्रूमेन्टस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/349 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बहुभार सेल आधारित वे ब्रिज प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलबन्दी:- स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की जाएगी।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो और 1 कि. ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के, 2×10के या 5 × 10 के के हैं जो के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (352)/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6664
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003 / ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S.O. 2896 Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic , (multi load cell type weigh bridge ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " UWB " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class III) and with brand name " UNIQUE INSTRUMENTS " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model , manufactured by M/s. Unique Instruinents, 213 , Raj Ratan Industrial Estate , Opp : S.N.D.T. Mahila College , Near American Spring, Malad (West, ) Mumbai -400064 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2003/349;
The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a multi load cell based weigh bridge type weighing instrument with amaximum capacity of 40 tonnes and minimum capacity of 100Kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 5Kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The insturment operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section , 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 1kg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10k , or 5× 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.
[F: No. WM - 21 (352 )/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
6665
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2897. केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः, अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वीटेक इंजीनियरिंग इंटरप्राइज, 6-4-323 /ए, विवेक वमशी, फ्लैट सं. 201 , मोलकपुर , हैदराबाद-500080 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डब्ल्यूई ई- टी टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( दोहरी रेंज टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वीटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/ 275 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) और अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा./30 कि.ग्रा. , न्यूनतम 40 का अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित ( दोहरी रेंज टेबल टाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 20 कि.ग्रा. तक 2 ग्रा. और 20 कि.ग्रा. से ऊपर और 30 कि.ग्रा. तक 5 ग्रा. है । प्रदर्श इकाई निर्वात फ्लोरमेंट प्रदर्श ( वी एफ डी) प्रकार की है । ' उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी की गई है । और केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार, और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) की संख्या और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 * हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 213 )/2002 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6666
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2897. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
1, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of, non - automatic Weighing instrument ( Table top type dual range) with digital indication ( hereinreferred to as the Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class - III ) and "WEE -TT " series with brnad name " WEITEC" , Manufactured by M/s Weitec Engineering Enterprise , 6-4- 323 / A , Vivek Vamshi , Flat No. 201 , Bholakpur, Hyderabad- 500080 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /275;
ThesaidModel is a strain gauge type load cell based non automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type dual range)with digital indication of maximum capacity 20kg/ 30kg , minimum capacity 40g and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III ) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 2g upto 20kg and above 20kg upto 30kg 5g. The displayunit is ofvacuum flourcent display (VFD ) type . The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with the number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10 , 2 x 10k or 5 x 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM-21 (213)/2002]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6667 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
मई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2898.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वीटेक इंजीनियरिंग इंटरप्राइज , 6-4-323 /ए, विवेक वमशी, फ्लैट सं. 201 , भोलकपुर, हैदराबाद -500080 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डब्ल्यूई ई - पी टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( दोहरी रेंज प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " बीटेक" है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /2003 / 276 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमाडल एक दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) और अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. / 250 कि.ग्रा. , न्यूनतम 400 ग्रा. का अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित ( दोहरी रेंज प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) कामान 200 कि.ग्रा . तक 20 ग्रा. और 200 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 250 कि.ग्रा. तक 50 ग्रा. है । प्रदर्श इकाई निर्मात फ्लोरमेंट् ( वी एफ डी) प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी की गई है । और केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन केइस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार, और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 500 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 या 2 × 10 % या 5 × 10 * हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 213 )/ 2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6668
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
NewDelhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2898.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Models described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of, non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform type dual range) with digital indication (hereinreferred to as the Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class- III) and " WEE -PT " series with brnad name " WEITEC" , Manufactured by M/s Weitec Engineering Enterprise, 6-4-323/A, Vivek Vamshi , Flat No. 201 , Bholakpur, Hyderabad - 500080 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/276 :
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non automatic weighing instrument (Platform type dual range)with digital indication of maximum capacity 200kg/250kg, minimum capacity 400g and belonging to medium accuracy class(accuracy class - III ) . The value ofverification scale interval ' e'is 20g upto 200kg and above 200kg upto 250kg it is 50g. The display unit is of vacuum flourcent display (VFD) type . The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing is also done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise ofthe power conferredby Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 500kg with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 x 10k or 2 x 10k, or 5 x 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM-21 ( 213 )/2002]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6669 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नईदिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का० आ० 2899.- केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वीटेक इंजीनियरिंग इंटरप्राइज, 6-4-323/ए, विवेक वमशी , फ्लैट सं. 201 , भोलकपुर, हैदराबाद-500080 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डब्ल्यू ई ई - पी टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वीटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें मौडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/ 2003/277 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल एक दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) और अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. न्यूनतम 4 कि.ग्रा. का अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन के लिए संपरिवर्तित किट ) तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई) का मान 200 कि.ग्रा. है । प्रदर्श इकाई निर्वात फ्लोरमेंट ( वी एफ डी) प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
Waiten
Weitec
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी की गई है । और केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करते है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार, और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 या 2 × 10* या 5 × 10के के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम . - 21 ( 213 )/2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2803 G1/03-6 6670
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S. O. 2899. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Models described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of, non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conservation kit for Platform machine) with digital indication ( herein referred to as the Model) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III) and " WEE -PT" series with brnad name " WEITEC" , Manufactured by M/ s Weitec Engineering Enterprise, 6-4-323/ Ą, Vivek Vamshi , Flat No. 201 , Bholakpur, Hyderabad- 500080 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /276;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non automatic weighing Instrument (Conversion kit for Platform machine) with digital indication of maximum capacity 500 kg, minimunt capacity 4kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III ) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 200g . The display unit is ofVacuum flourcent display ( VFD) type . The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.
practices. In addition to sealing the stamping plate , scaling is also done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent
w
1 Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and up to 1000kg with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10 or 2 x 10k, 5x 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .
[ F. No. WM -21 (213 )/2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6671 [भागII-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर , 2003
का० आ० 2900.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वीटेक इंजीनियरिंग इंटरप्राइज , 6-4-323 /ए, विवेक वमशी, फ्लैट सं. 201 , भोलकपुर, हैदराबाद-500080 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डब्ल्यू ई ई- डब्ल्यू बी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वीटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2003 / 278 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) और अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन, न्यूनतम 200 कि.ग्रा. का अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित ( वे ब्रिज ) तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि.ग्रा. है । प्रदर्श इकाई निर्वात प्रकाशन उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल इ.डी ) प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेंट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी की गई है । और केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार, और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5. × 10 % हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (213 ) /2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6672
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]
NewDelhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S. O. 2900 -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of, non -automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge ) with digital indication (herein referred to as the Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III) and "WEE-WB" series with brand name " WEITEC" , Manufactured by M/ s Weitec Engineering Enterprise , 6-4-323 /A, Vivek Vamshi , Flat No. 201 , Bholakpur , Hyderabad- 500080 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 278 ;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge) with digital indication of maximum capacity 40 tonne , minimum capacity 200kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III ). The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 10kg . The display unit is of light emitting diode (LED) type. The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.
५ practices. Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing is also done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5kg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10 , 2 x 10 * or 5 x 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 213 )/ 2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6673 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2901.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि. उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वीटेक इंजीनियरिंग इंटरप्राइज, 6-4-323/ए, विवेक वमशी , फ्लैट सं. 201 , भोलकपुर, हैदराबाद -500080 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डब्ल्यू ई ई - डब्ल्यूबी सी " श्रंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वीटेक' है ( जिसे इसमें माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2003/ 279 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमाडल एक दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) और अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन, न्यूनतम 200 कि.ग्रा. का अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित ( वे ब्रिज के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि.ग्रा. है । प्रदर्श इकाई प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी की गई है । और केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार, और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित या 50 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 या 2 × 10* या 5 × 10के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 213 )/2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 66/4
[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2901. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of, non- automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit forweighbridge ) with digital indication (herein referred to as the Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class- III ) and "WEE - WBC " series with brand name " WEITEC " , manufactured by M/ s Weitec Engineering Enterprise, 6- 4-323 / A, Vivek Vamshi , Flat No. 201 , Bholakpur , Hyderabad - 500080 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/279
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non automatic weighing instrument (Conversion kit weighbridge) with digital indication of maximum capacity 40 tonne, minimum capacity 200kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III ) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 10kg. The display unit is of light emitting diode (LED) type. The instrument operates on 230V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.
practices. In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5kg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10 or 2 x 10k, 5 x 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (213 )/2002]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6675 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2902.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एडिटसन टैक्नोलोजीकल प्रोड्यूस, 102 साउथ एक्स. प्लाजा- II , मस्जिद मोठ, नई दिल्ली 110049 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ए एच " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलग उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्सेल " है ( जिसे इसमें माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 143 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त माडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतिमापी भार सेल आधारित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धाग तिटात प्रत्लागार कार्य करता है ।
WEIGI
सीलबंद करना: स्यम्पलगाने वाली प्लेट पर सील लगाने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द किया जायेगा । और केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी यथार्थता वर्ग और उसी मेक वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 की. रेंज में है और जिनके सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनके लिए " ई " मान. 1 × 10 या 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं , जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक हैं या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 160 )/2000 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6676
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2902.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of Model of, self- indicating , non - automatic (Tabletop type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AH " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and withbrand name EXCELL" (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s .Aditson Technological Products , 102, South Ex Plaza - II , Masjid Moth , New Delhi - 110049 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/143
The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 6kg and minimum capacity of 20g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.
Sealing: In addition to sealing is the stamping plate, sealing is also done to prevent opening machine for fraudulent practices.
ANCEL
WELONING SCALES
7 Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsimilar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2 g and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5kg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10k or 2 x 10k , 5 x 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 ( 160)/2000]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6677 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2903.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सम्राट डिस्पेन्सर्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, ई-187 , जी आई डी सी, इलेक्ट्रानिक इस्टेट, सेक्टर 25, गांधी नगर -382044 द्वारा " सम्राट " श्रृंखला के वितरक पम्प के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सम्राट पम्प" है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी 09/2003/284 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
"Smart"
OllMix Type Dispensing Pump
सीलबंदी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की गई है। उक्तमॉडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक संपरिवर्तन किट है । जो वितरक पम्प के यांत्रिक सदृश सूचन के अंकक निर्गत में संपरिवर्तित करती है । पम्प की अधिकतम परिमाण क्षमता सात अंकीय प्रदर्श द्वारा उपदर्शित की जानी है और लघुतम मान प्रभाव प्रभाग 1 मि. ली. है । यह प्रणली 4 कि.ग्रा. /से. मी. के लगातार दाब पर काम करती है इसमें परिमाण और रकम के लिए एक पूर्वनिर्धारित युक्ति है मशीन का परीक्षण 45 ली. /प्रति मिनट की न्यूनतम प्रवाह दर पर किया गया था । यह पूर्व निर्धारित तेल नाजेल तक वितरित करती है और इसमें वितरिक तेल के लिए प्रषक प्रदर्श होताहै ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 4 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2803 G1/03-7 6678
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S. O. 2903.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( sec the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model ofthe conversion kit for dispensing pump of" SMART " series and with brand name " SMART PUMP " ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Smart Dispensers Private Limited, E- 187, GIDC, Electronic Estate, Sector- 25, Gandhi Nagar - 382044 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2003/284
Sealing: In addition to scaling stamping plate, sealing is done to prevent opening of the measuring unit , totalizers for fraudulent practices
"Smart"
Ori Mu Type Dispensing Pump
The said Model (see the figure given below ) is a conversion kit which converts nicchanical analogue Indication ofdispensing pump to digital out put. The maximum volume capacity of the pump is indicated by a seven digit display and the smallest . scale division is i ml. The systems works on a constant pressure of 4kg /cm² . It has a pre set device for volume and amount. The machine was tested at a minimum flow rate of 451 /per minute. It dispenses pre set oil to the nozzle and has a separate display for oil dispensed.
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 4)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6679 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
नईदिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का. आ. 2904.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेल सिस्टम्स एंड सर्विसेज , प्लाट नं . 173 , डेवलप्ड प्लाटस, इस्टेट फार इलेक्ट्रिकल , इलेक्ट्रानिक एण्ड इन्स्ट्रमेन्टस इंडस्ट्रीज , पेरुगुडी, चेन्नई -600096 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डब्ल्यू एस -01 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( निलंबी स्केल ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेल्स " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2003 / 282 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त माडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित ( निलंबी स्केल ) जो मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड के प्रकार का है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बंद करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की जाती है । और केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित माडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 50 कि.ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 300 कि. ग्रा. की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं , जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 147) /2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णमूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6680
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S. O. 2904. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Models described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
لا Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of, non - automatic weighing instrument (Hanging scale) with digital indication ( herein referred to as the Model) belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class - III ) and "WS-01 " series with brand name " MELSS " , manufactured by M/s . Mel Systems and Services , Plot No. 173 , Developed Plots Estates for Electrical , Electronic and Instruments Industries , Perungudi , Chennai -600096 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/282;
The said Model ( see the figure ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Hanging Scale) with digital indication ofa maximum capacity 100kg minimum capacity of 400g.and belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class - III) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 20g . The display unit is of liquid crystal diode (LCD) type . The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the power conferredby Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 50kg to 300kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 50g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10,2 x 10 , or 5 x 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM-21 ( 147)/2002]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का० आ ० 2905.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करना रहेगा ;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मेल सिस्टम्स एंड सर्विसेज, प्लाट नं. 173 , डेवलप्ड प्लाटस, इस्टेट फार इलेक्ट्रिकल, इलेक्ट्रानिक एण्ड इन्स्ट्रूमेन्टस इंडस्ट्रीज, पेरुन्गुडी, चेन्नई -600096 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " बी डब्ल्यू-01 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( बैच वेयर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेल्स " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्नन आई एन डी/09 /2003/283 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित ( बैच वेयर ) जो मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 25 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई) कामान 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड के प्रकार का है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बंद करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की जाती है । और, केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्रके अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा.से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई" मान केलिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक कीरेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है, जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा० सं ० डब्ल्यू. एम-21 ( 147 )/2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6682
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11, 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S. O. 2005.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Y Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of, non- automatic weighing instrument (Batchweigher) with digital indication (herein referred to as the Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class- III) and " BW -01 " series with brand name " MELSS'' , manufactured by M/s . Mel Systems and Services , Plot No. 173. Developed Plots Estates for Electrical , Electronic and Instruments Industries , Perungudi , Chennai - 600096 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /283 ;
The said Model (see the figure ) is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic weighing instrument (Batchweigher ) with digital indication of a maximum capacity 25kg , minimum capacity 200g and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class -III ) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 10g. The display unit is of light emitting diode (LED) type. The instruments operates on 230V , 50Hertz alternate current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of the said Section , the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with the number of verification scale interyal (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k , kbeing a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 ( 147)/2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6683 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का० आ ० 2906.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया हैकि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मेल सिस्टम्स एंड सर्विसेज, प्लाट नं. 173 , डेवलप्ड प्लाटस, इस्टेट फार इलेक्ट्रिकल , इलेक्ट्रानिक एण्ड इन्स्ट्रूमेन्टस इंडस्ट्रीज, पेरुन्गुडी, चेन्नई -600096 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एम डब्ल्यू-01 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण (मोनो रेल प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेल्स " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2003 / 284 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्तमॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतिमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित ( मोनो रेल ) जो मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 25 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उतसर्जक डायोड के प्रकार का है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बंद करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की जाती है । और, केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार, और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा .से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन अंतराल संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 या 2 × 10 या 5 × 10* के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम . - 21 (147 ) /2002 ]
पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6684
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
NewDelhi , the 3rd October, 2003
i S. O. 2906. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of, non- automatic weighing instrument (Monorail type) with digital indication (herein referred to as the Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III) and "MW-01 " series with brand name "MELSS " , manufactured by M/ s . Mel Systems and Services, Plot No. 173 , Developed Plots Estates for Electrical , Electronic and Instruments Industries , Perungudi , Chennai - 600096 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/284;
The said Model is (see the figure ) a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Monorail type) with digital indication of a maximum capacity 25kg minimum capacity of 200g.and belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class - III) , The value ofverification scale interval ' e' is 10g. The display unit is of light emitting diode(LED) type. The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hertz alternate current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg, and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10k or 2 x 10k or 5 x 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM - 21 (147)/2002]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6685 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
25
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19,
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2907.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह सभाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अंब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए सी आई सिस्टम एंड सर्विसेज, 17 , वेकन्टचैला नायकेन स्ट्रीट, रायपुरम, चेन्नई -600013 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " यू डब्ल्यू-100" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अकंक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन सिक्का प्रचालित स्केल ) के मॉड का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूनी वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2003 / 268 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्तमॉडल विकृतमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन सिक्का प्रचालित स्केल ) तोलन उपकरण है जो मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) का है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श यूनिट प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्दु की जाती है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 ग्रा. या उसके अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल संख्या सहित 150 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 108 )/2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2803 G1 /03-8 6686
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ ASVINA 19. 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S.O. 2907.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering ( he report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the, Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Person weighing machine - Coin opearted scale ) with digital indication (hereinafter referred to as the model ) belonging to medium accuracy ass (accuracy class - III) and " UW - 100 " series with brand name " UNIWEIGH " , manufactured by M/s. ACI Systems and Services , 17, Venkatachala Naicken Street, Raipuram , Chennai - 600013 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/268;
Thesaid Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Person weighing machine -coin operated scale) with digital indication of maximum capacity 150 kg, nunimum capacity 2 kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 100g. The display unit is of light emitting diode (LED ) type . The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply. practices. In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 150.kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 108 )/2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6687 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2908.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए सी आई सिस्टम एंड सर्विसेज, वेकन्टचैला नायकेन स्ट्रीट, रायपुरम, चेन्नई-600013 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " यू डब्ल्यू 202 - एल " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूनी वे " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2003/269 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्त मॉडल विकृतमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. और जो मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) का है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श यूनिट प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्द की जाती और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 50 ग्रा. या उसके अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल संख्या सहित 50 ग्रा. या उसके अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 500 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 108 )/2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6688
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2908.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Model) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Conversion kit for Platform machine) with digital indication (herein referred to as the Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class - III) and " UW- 202 -L " series with brand name " UNIWEIGH " , manufactured by M/ s . ACI Systems and Services , 17 , Venkatachala Naicken Street, Raipuram , Chennai -600013 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/269;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit for Platform machine) with digital indication of maximum capacity 300 kg, minimum capacity 2 kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III ) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 100g. The display unit is of light emitting diodel (LED) type . The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply. practices. In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing is done to prevent opening of machines for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 50 kg to 500 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 50g or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 108)/2002]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6689 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2909.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए सी आई सिस्टम एंड सर्विसेज , 7 , वेकन्टचैला नायकेन स्ट्रीट, रायपुरम, चेन्नई -600013 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थत वर्ग III ) वाले " यूडब्ल्यू-2002 ए " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अकंक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूनीवे " है (जिसे इसमें माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2003 / 270 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमाडल विकृतमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित ( वेब्रिज के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट) तोलन उपकरण है इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 25000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है तथा मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) का है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि.ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श यूनिट प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धाराविद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
चाहिए । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की जानी और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " माग के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल संख्या सहित 5 टन से 50 टन तक की रेंज में अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 108) /2002 ]
पी.ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6690
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S.O. 2909.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
7 Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Conversion kit for Weighbridge) with digital indication (hereinafter referred to as the Model ) belonging to medium Accuracy class (Accuracy class - III) and " UW - 202- A" series with brand name " UNIWEIGH " , manufactured by M/s . ACI Systems and Services , 17, Venkatachala Naicken Street, Raipuram, Chennai - 600013 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/270;
The saidModel is a strain gange type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Conversion kit for Weighbridge) with digital indication of maximum capacity 25000 kg , minimum capacity 200 kg and belonging to medium Accuracy class ( Accuracy class - III). The value of verification scale interval ' e' is 10 kg. The display unit is of light emitting diode (LED) type . The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing should also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 5 tonne to 50 tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 ( 108)/ 2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6691 { भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2910.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्वात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का योग करते हुए मैसर्स ओरिन आटोमेशन सिस्टम्स सं० 96 , 11 वां मुख्य बी टी एम प्रथम स्टेज, बंगलौर -560029 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थत वर्ग III ) वाले " बेस्ट" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन के लिए संपरिवर्तन प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ओरयिन " है ( जिसे इसमें माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 274 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदंग प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ;
उक्त माडल विकृतमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. जो मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) का है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श यूनिट प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की जाती है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 50 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 500 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10* हैं, जो के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 130 )/2002 ] पी.ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6692
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2910. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Model) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Conversion kit for Platform machine ) with digital indication (herein referred to as the Model ) belonging to medium Accuracy class (Accuracy class - III) and " BEST " series with brand name " ORION" , manufactured by M/ s . Orion Automation Systems, No. 96, 11th Main B.T.M 1st Stage , Banglore- 560029 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/069/2003/274
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit for Platform machine) with digital indication of maximum capacity 300 kg minimum capacity 2 kg and belonging to medium Accuracy class (Accurace class - III ). The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 100g. The display unit is of light emitting diode type. The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .
practices. In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12) of the said Section , the Central Governmen. hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 50 kg to 500 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 50g more and with ' e' value of 1x 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design, accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 130)/2002]
P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6693 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/ आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नईदिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2911.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेकट्रानिक्स, नं० 244, लेनिन स्ट्रीट, कोसपलायम पांडिचेरी 605013 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एम् ई सी सी एफ " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( कप फिलर ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम ई सी एच सी एफ " है ( जिसे इसमें माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/95 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
FFS POWDER MACHINE
MEC30 P, 50 P, 100 P, 250 P, 500 P, 1000P.
उक्त माडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( कप फिलर) है । यह स्थिरशीर्ध के अधीन ग्रविटीफीड के सिद्धात पर कार्य करती है । मशीन 2 ग्राम. से 1000 ग्राम के बीच की किसी रेंज में परिदान के लिए समायोजित की जा सकती है । यह प्रति मिनट 30 थैली (अधिकतम ) भर सकती है । मशीन चाय , मसाले , शर्करा , चावल, नमक कणिकाएं अपमार्जक बीज, औषधीय और कृषि उत्पादों जैसे मुक्त प्रवाही उत्पादों के भरने के लिए डिजाइन की गई है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रादय पर कार्य करता है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 291 ) /2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2803 G1 /03-9 6694
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2911- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over the periods of sustained use and render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the automatic filling machine (cup filler)MEC- OF series and with brand name " MECH - CF " ( herein referred to as the Model ) manufactured by M/sMechtronics, No. 244, Lenin Street , Kosapalyam , Pondicherry - 605013 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/95;
7 FFS POWDER MACHINE
: MEC30 P, 50 P, 100 P, 250 P, 500 P, 1000P.
The said Model (see the figure ) is an automatic filling machine (cup filler) . It works on the principle of gravity feed under constant head. The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 2g to 1000g . It can fill 30 pouches per minute (maximum) . The machine is designed to fill free flowing products such as tea, spices, sugar, rice, salt granules, detergents , seeds, Pharmaceutical, and agricultural products . It operates on 220 volt, 50hertz alternate current power supply.
[F. No. WM - 21 (291)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6695
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/ आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2912.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स लारसन एंड टूब्रों लिमिटेड, डिपार्टमेंट , ई बी जी एस बी यू 3 /पी डी डी, पवई वर्क्स, मुबई -400072 द्वारा विनिर्मित " पेस मेकर IV " श्रृंखला के यांगिक वितरक पम्प काअंकक सूचन सहित इलेक्ट्रानिक वितरक पम्प में संपरिवर्तन के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एल एंड टी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 / 273 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
PETROL
PETROL
उक्त माडल एक यांगिक सदृश वितरक पम्प को अंकक सूचन सहित वितरक पम्प में संपरिवर्तन के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट है जिसमें समायोजन के लिए अंश शोधन पहिया के साथ धनात्मक विस्थापन मीटर की व्यवस्था है । अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 90 लीटर प्रति मिनट संप्रेक्षित की गई है । इसमें रकम और परिणाम के लिए पूर्व सेट की गई युक्ति है । प्रदर्श द्रव क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श ( एल सी डी) प्रकार का है । परिणाम का सूचन सात अंकीय प्रदर्श पर है और अधिकतम संभव कीमत प्रदर्श रु. 9999.99 तक है और न्यूनतम प्रदर्शित मात्रा 10 मि.ली. है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रादय पर कार्य करता है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 133 )/2002 ]
पी.ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6696
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2912.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Model) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Conversion of mechanical Dispensing Pump in to Electronic Dispensing pump digital indication (herein referred to as the Model ) of "PACEMAKER IV" series with brand name " L & T " , manufactured by M/s. Larsen and Toubro Limited, Dept; EBG- SBU3 /PDD , Powai Works , Mumbai -400072 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/273 ;
PETROL
PETROL
The said Model is a Conversion kit for converting mechanical analogue dispensing pump in to dispensing pump with digital display having a positive displacement meter provided with calibration wheel for adjustment. The maximum flow rate observed is 90 liter per minute . It has a preset device for money and volume . The display is of liquid Crystal Display (LCD ) type . The volume is indicated on a seven digit display and maximum price display possible is Rs . 9999.99 and the minimum quantity is displayed is 10ml . The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 133 )/2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6697 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2913.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्विसर इन्स्ट्रूमेंट्स, बी-29, गोपाल नगर , जनता नगर के पीछे, चन्द खेड़ा, गांधी नगर-382424 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस डब्ल्यूआई " श्रृंखला के स्वतःसूचक अस्वचालित , अकंक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड कानाम "स्विसर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2002/ 129 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक भार सेल आधारित 5 कि.ग्रा . की अधिकतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. की न्यूनतम क्षमता सहित तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन व्यक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबंद करने के अतिरिक्त आंतरिक पुर्जों को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मशीन के तल को सीलबंद किया जाएगा । यदि आंतरिक यंत्र रचना को ठीक करने के लिए मशीन के ढांजे में औजारों के प्रवेश के लिए किसी विकास की व्यवस्था की गई है , तो उनको भीसीलबंद किया जाए ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदनके इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (120 )/2000 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6698
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S.O. 2913.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and (8) and of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self - indicating, non-automatic, (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SWI " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name " SWISSER" (hereinafter referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/s. Swisser Instruments , B -29 , Gopal Nagar, Behind Jantanagar, Chandkheda , Gandhi Nagar - 382424 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2002/ 129 ;
The said model ( see the figure given) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 5 Kg and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;
SEALING: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the machine shall be sealed at the bottom of to prevent opening of the internal parts . In case any opening is provided in the body of machine for introduction of tools to adjust the internal mechanism they also be sealed.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100g to 2g and with number of verfication scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design, and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model have been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 120)/2000 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6699 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2914.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स क्वाई ऑटो मीटर सं. 7, कोनार्ड आदित्य को. सोसायटी, द्वितीय तल, 15 केस्टलीनो रोड़, गोलीबर मैदान के पास पुणे -411001 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एटी-110" श्रृंखला के अकंक सूचन सहित टैक्सी/ आटो किराया मीटर के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ईगल " है ( जिसे इसमें माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2002/ 138 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
सीलिंग: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के साथ सीलिंग कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोलने से रोकने के लिए पल्स जेनरेटर, केबल संयोजन बिन्दुओं तथा कपटपूर्ण मुख्य किराया मीटर पर मुद्रांकन किया जाएगा ।
उक्तमाडल एक टैक्सी मीटर है जिसमें दूरी और समय मापक युक्ति सहित अंकक सूचन समाविष्ट है । यह निरंतर योग करता है तथा यात्रा केकिसी क्षण में यात्री द्वारा संदेय प्रभार उपदर्शित करता है । तय की गई दूरी और लगे समय की कतिपय गति से नीचे के अनुसार संदेय किराया मीटर काकार्य है मीटर का पठन सात खण्डीय प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड द्वारा उपदर्शित किया जाता है और विद्युत प्रदाय डी सी 12 वोल्ट है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (81 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6700
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2914. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
ร Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the Taxi meter of "AT- 110 " series with digital display and with brand name " EAGLE " (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Qawee Auto Meter , No. 7 , Konark Aditya Co -operative Society , IInd floor , 15, Castllino Road, Near Golibar Maidan, Pune -411 001 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2002/ 138 ;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing is done on the pulse generator , cable connector and the main fare meter to prevent the opening of the instrument for fraudulent practices .
The said model is taxi meter with digital indication incorporated with a distance and time measuring the device . It totalizes continuously indicates the fare at any moment of the journey , and charges payable by passenger. the'Fare to pay' is a function of the distance travelled above a certain speed and of the length of the time occupied below that speed during the contracted travel . The reading of the meter is indicated by seven segments light emitting diode (LED) and power supply is DC 12 V.
[F. No. WM -21 ( 81 )/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6701 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2915.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ग्लोबल इन्स्ट्रूमेंट्स, 8 , निवास प्रेसीडेन्सी, अपो: पुलिस कमिश्नर आफिस , नासिक, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " जी एल टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , अकंक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ग्लोबल " है ( जिसे इसमें माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 287 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्त माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकाम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
जाएगी। सीलबन्दी: स्यम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबंद करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बंद की और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्यां सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 348 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2803 G1/03-10 6702
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S.O. 2915.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non-automatic, (Table type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GLT " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name " GLOBAL " ( here referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s. Global Instruments , 8, Nivas Presidency, Opp: Police Commissioner Office, Nasik , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/287;
The said Model ( see the figure given ) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 10 kg. and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval (e) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
SEALING: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100m.g. to 2g. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2× 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , and with the same materials with which, the approved said Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (348 )/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6703 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
नईदिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2916.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ग्लोबल इन्स्ट्रुमेंट्स, 8 , निवास प्रेसीडेन्सी, अपो: पुलिस कमिश्नर आफिस , नासिक, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " जी एल पी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अंस्वचालित , अकंक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल, का, जिनके ब्रांड कानाम " ग्लोबल " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/288 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;
उक्तमाडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शंत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाष है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
गई है । सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबंद करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बंद की और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 3000 कि.ग्रा. की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 348 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6704
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11, 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2916. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 7) and (8) and of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non-automatic, (Plat form type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GLP " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " GLOBAL" ( hereinreferred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Global Instruments , 8 , Nivas Presidency, Opp : Police Commissioner Office, Nasik , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2002/288 ;
The said Model ( figure given below ) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 60 kg. and minimum capacity of 200g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply;
SEALING : In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging from 50 kg . to 300 kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' value 1x 10k; 2× 10k or 5x10% , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved said Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 348)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6705 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2917.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रो वेट इण्डिया , सी -102, सरस्वती इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, वडोदरा -390002 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " ई डब्ल्यू- 10" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित ( टेबल प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण के माडल, का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इलैक्ट्रा वेट इन्डिया" है (जिसे इसमें उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/262 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमाडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज भार सेल आधारित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 11 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
गई है । सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबंद करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बंद की और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला केवैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एम ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें " के " वनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 301 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6706
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October, 2003
S.O. 2917.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and. Measures(Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self-indicating, non-automatic, Table type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EW - 10" series of High accuracy (Accuracy ckass II) with brand name " ELECTRO WEIGHT INDIA " (hereinafter referred to as the model) , manufactured by M/s. Electro Weight India , C- 102 , Sarswathi Industrial Estate, Vadodara -390 002 and which, Is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/262;
The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauage load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 11kg and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to the prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
/
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale internal (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10% , 2× 10 or 5 × 10 , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (301 )/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6707 भारत का रामपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2918.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया हैकि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (भीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रो वेट इण्डिया, सी -102 , सरस्वती इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, वडोदरा -390002 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) " ई डब्ल्यू-101 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , अकंक सूचन सहित ( टेबल प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इलैक्ट्रो वेट इण्डिया " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/263 समनुदेशित किया गयाहै, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज भार सेल आधारित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलम प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
गई है । सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बंद करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बंद की और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा.से 2 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उस से अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज की सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 301 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप, विज्ञान THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11, 2003/ ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd October, 2003
S.O. 2918.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non-automatic, (Table type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "EW- 101 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name "ELECTRO WEIGHT INDIA" (here referred to as the model ) , manufactured byM/s .Electro Weight India, C- 102, Sarswathi Industrial Estate, Vadodara -390 002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/263;
The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with amaximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has'a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result: The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50- Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing:In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design , and with the same materials with which, the approved said Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (301 )/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 6709 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2919.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रो वेट इण्डिया, सी -102 , सरस्वती इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, वडोदरा -390002 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " ई डब्ल्यू-101 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इलैक्ट्रो बेट इण्डिया " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/264 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;
यह मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ;
सीलबन्दी: स्टापिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की गई है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उस से अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 300 कि.ग्रा. तक की रेंज के अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (301 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप. विज्ञान 2803 GI/2003-11 6710
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11, 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART. II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2919. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Model ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issued and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of self- indicating, non- automatic (Plat form type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EW - 1001 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ELECTRO WEIGHT INDIA " ( herein referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/s . Electro Weight India, C- 102, Sarswathi Industrial Estate, Vadodara- 390 002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/ 2003 /264;
The said Model (See the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 50kg and minimum capacity 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging from 50 kg to 300 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 x 10k , 2 x 10k , or 5 x 10%, k being the positive or negative whole number of equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved said model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (301)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6711 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
नई दिल्ली , 3 अक्तूबर, 2003
का.आ. 2920.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स देवी श्री मुद्रन प्रा. लिमिटेड, 900 एम आई ई, बहादुरगढ़ ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " डी टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डॉलफिन " है ( जिसे इसमें माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 286 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित 25 कि.ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता और 100 ग्रा. की न्यूनतम क्षमता का अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण है सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
गई है । सीलबन्दी: स्टापिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 5 ग्रा. या उस से अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल (एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (59 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6712
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2003
S.O. 2920 Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Model) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non-automatic (Table type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " DT " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class 111 ) and with brand name " Dolphin " (here in referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Devishree Mundran Pvt . Limited, 900 M.I.E. , Bahadurgarh (Haryana ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2003/286;
The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with maximum capacity of 25 kg, and minimum capacity 100 g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing is done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by suo - section ( 12 ) of the said Section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval(n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value 1 x 10% , 2 x 10 or 5 x 10%, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (59)/2001 ]
P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director Legal Metrology [ भाग II खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
6713
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
1 पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय
वडोदरा नई दिल्ली, 22 सितम्बर, 2003
का.आ. 2921.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में सिसवा- रामोल पाइपलाइन परियोजना से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्थाके साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिस में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड , दर्पण बिल्डिंग , आर. सी. दत्त रोड, अल्कापुरी, वडोदरा -390 005 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
ग्राम
जिला तहसील
ब्लाक
सर्वे नंबर नंबर
उ.का.अ. के लिए अर्जितकी जाने वाली भूमि (हैक्टेयर में)
5
3
4
1
2
0-01-30 वडोदरा
वडोदरा
(1) दसरथ 616
0-18-74
617
0-01-82
618
619
0-21-23
0-17-60
630
0-07-80
633
631
0-17-50
632
0-08-85
634
0-06-25
635
636
0-23-94
643
0-00-75
655
0-28-73
656
0-06-56
683
4
5 2
3
0-28-73 वडोदरा
679
0-17-50 (1) दसरथ 680 (जारी)
0-29-55
675
676
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
715
0-15-20
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
0-15-90
719
718
0-13-50
0-41-65
724
0-12-00
725
903.
0-03-84
0-02-33
कार्टट्रेक
51
0-07-69
0-07-69
50
0-07-08
49
0-05-67
48
0-05-06
47
45
0-20-23
46
0-24-28
44/अ-ब
43
0-12-10
0-01-52
कार्टट्रेक
0-16-50
58
0-11-00
59
0-10-50
60
0-02-06
57
0-01-52
कार्टट्रेक
04-78-17
कुल
0-09-50 (2)आजोड 345
रोड
0-25-00
349
348
रोड
0-24-00
350
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक
382
0-18-50
0-18-50
381
0-16-00
380
0-18-00
387
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक
0-11-60
2
0-09-35
5
0-07-12
कार्टट्रेक
0-01-32
11
0-03-05
12
0-07-12
13
0-07-64
14
0-24-20
16 6714
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ ASVINA 19, 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 वडोदरा वडोदरा
0-08-44 वडोदरा
(2)आजोड 25
24
(जारी )
0-14-20
27
0-11-20
26
0-15-55
38
0-19-75
39
0-26-05
36
88
87
0-11-25
89
0-22-70
86
कार्टट्रेक 0-01-50
98
0-35-55
कार्टट्रेक 0-01-50
99
0-26-60
04-19-79
कुल
0-53-90
(3) सोखडा 670
673
0-17-70
674
0-13-85
677
0-21-60
689
0-32-50
690
0-00-25
691
0-15-00
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक
रोड
923
0-43-30
02-01-60
कुल
0-05-08
207
(4) पदमला
0-07-30
207/अ-ब
206
205
0-06-90
204
184
0-08-80
185
0-07-30
183
0-12-00
182
186
0-17-30
165
0-44-70
166
164
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक
130
131
0-11-00
144
0-10-90
134
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 2
3
4
5 वडोदरा
0-12-70 (4) पदमूला 135
136
(जारी)
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक
106
0-30-20
105
0-15-40
104
102
0-13-00
101
रोड
02-47-10
कुल
0-11-00 (5) सांकरदा रीवर
0-01-50
833/2
838/4
0-44-60
838/3
841
0-53-70
783
784
0-11-50
785/1
0-08-50
786
0-23-50
760/2
761
0-38-40
763
751/2
0-08-40
751/1
750/2
कार्टट्रेक/नाला 0-09-70
422
0-01-50
410
0-10-50
रोड/कार्टट्रेक 0-04-10
420
0-06-20
421
418/3
0-07-30
418/4
0-01-50
418/1
0-09-50
426
0-11-80
430 0-07-60
398/2
0-05-20
431/2
397
0-12-30
431/1
0-11-60
कार्टट्रेक
395
0-05-20 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
6715
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
1
4
5
2
3
1
0-20-80 वडोदरा
वडोदरा वडोदरा
(5) सांकरदा 373/3
कार्टट्रेक
(जारी )
373/2
373/1
374/3
0-21-80
373-1
0-11-80
331/1-पैकी
368/3
0-02-60
370
0-08-30
368/2
0-03-10
कार्टट्रेक
369
0-19-00
363
0-07-80
362
0-13-00
04-32-00
कुल
0-06-40
102
(6) रायका
103
104
0-11-00
105
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक
-0-30-90
कुल
(7) दोडका 470/पैकी-1 0-11-70
474
0-14-60
472/पैकी-1
476
467
0-02-20
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक
489
0-14-00
490
0-13-20
0-03-50
491
0-06-60
492
466
493
0-20-30
520
521
0-17-90
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक
518
0-08-60
0-03-70
538
0-04-60
540
539
0-06-40
0-10-10
541
5 3
2
4
0-07-10 वडोदरा (7) दोडका 549
0-07-80
545
(जारी)
542/पैकी 0-03-00
0-03-50
544/पैकी-1
543
0-16-70
0-01-70
कार्टट्रेक
0-36-30
589
601
0-10-20
598
0-03-09
602
0-16-80
594/पैकी 0-13-70
596
0-01-90
595
0-11-70
कार्टट्रेक 0-01-50
315
0-16-30
314
0-16-00
0-14-90
309
307/पैकी-10-30-10
305
0-08-50
306/पैकी-1 0-00-20
291/पैकी-1 0-23-80
0-02-60
290
नाला
0-03-80
286
0-23-20
0-17-30
285
284
0-03-00
नाला/कार्टट्रेक
230
0-20-40
231
0-19-50
229
0-19-50
228
0-01-20
कार्टट्रेक
04-99-35
कुल
(8) पोइचा 433
0-10-80
434
0-15-40
435
448
0-09-80
438
0-29-40
447
0-27-45
440
0-25-20
441/1
442/1
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक 6716
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ ASVINA 19, 1925
1.
2
3
5 वडोदरा वडोदरा
357/1-2 0-14-20
(8)पोइचा
351/1-2-3 0-30-40
0-01-50
कार्टट्रेक
278
0-20-30
277
276
0-24-40
269/पैकी 0-21-05
रोड
0-01-50
268
0-05-70
-कार्टट्रेक
7/अ
0-26-55
रोड
0-01-50
8
0-12-90
9
0-12-50
10/2
0-18-40
37
0-10-20
रोड
0-01-50
36
0-19-00
35
कार्टट्रेक
42/1
0-25-55
56
0-13-15
कार्टट्रेक 0-01-50
55/1
0-14-75
54
0-14-75
500/4
0-08-60
नाला
0-01-50
500/7
0-99-20
नाला
0-03-80
05-31-95
कुल
सावली
रोड
(9)खांडी
8.
0-22-80
9
0-10-90
10/1-2
59
0-05-80
60
0-11-90
61
0-05-58
63/1
0-07-92
65/2
0-01-50
66/1
0-18-63
[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii)] 1.
3
2
4
5
0-21-50
83/1-अ
84/1
0-04-75
67/1
कुल
01-13-88
[ फा. सं. एल-14014/41/03-जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS New Delhi , the 22nd September, 2003 S.O. 2921.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from Sisva- Ramol pipeline project in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which isdescribed in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and. Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, Darpan Building, R.C. Dutt Road , Alkapuri , Vadodara-390005 (Gujarat)
SCHEDULE
Distt.
Tehsil Village Survey Land to be
acquired for
Block
R.O.U. in
No. No.
Hectares 2
1
3
4
5
0-01-30 Vadodara Vadodara ( 1 ) Dasrath 616
617
0-18-74
618
0-01-82
619
0-21-23
630
0-17-60
633
0-07-80
631
632
0-17-50 6717 भारत की संजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
3
2
5 1
4
3
2
1
0-01-32
11
0-08-85
( 2 )Ajod
Vadodara Vadodara
( 1 ) Dasrath 634
Vadodara Vadodara
0-03-05
12
0-06-25
635
0-07-12
13
636
0-07-64
14
0-23-94
643
0-24-20
16
0-00-75
655
0-08-44
25
0-28-73
656
0-14-20
24
0-06-56
683
0-11-20
27
0-28-73
680
0-15-55
26
0-17-90
679
0-19-75
38
675
0-29-55
0-26-05
39
676
36
0-01-55
Cart-track
88
0-15-20
715
0-11-25
87
0-01-55
Cart-track
0-22-70
89
0-19-90
719
86
0-01-50
0-13-50
Cart-track 718
0-35-55
98
0-41-65
724
0-01-50
Cart-track
0-12-00
725
0-26-60
99
0-03-84
903
04-19-79
Total
0-02-33
Cart-track
0-53-90
0-07-69
670
51
(3) Sokhda
0-17-70
673
0-07-69
50
0-13-85
674
0-07-08
49
0-21-60
677
0-05-67
48
0-32-50
689
0-05-06
47
0-00-25
690
0-20-23
45
0-15-00
691
46
0-01-50 44/A&B 0-24-28
Cart-track
0-12-10
43
Road
0-01-52
Cart-track
0-43-30
923
0-16-50
58
02-01-60
Total
0-11-00
59
0-10-50
60
0-05-80
(4)Padamala 207
0-02-06
57
0-07-30
207/A-B
0-01-52
Cart-track
206
04-78-17
Total
0-06-90
205
0-09-50
204
(2)Ajod 345
0-05-50
Road
0-08-80
184
0-25-00
349
0-07-30
185
348
0-12-00
183
Road
0-24-00
350
182
0-01-50
Cart-track
0-17-30
186
0-18-50
382
0-44-70
165
0-18-50
381
166
0-16-00
380
0-18-00
164
387
0-01-50
Cart-track
0-01-50
Cart-track
0-11-60
2
130
0-09-35
5
0-11-00
131
0-07-12
Cart-track
2803 GI/2003-12 6718
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19; 1925
1
2
3
4
1
5
0-10-90 Vadodara Vadodara
144
(4)Padamala
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] 2
3
4
5
0-05-20
Vadodara Vadodara
134
135
0-12-70
136
Cart-track 0-01-50
106
0-30-20
105
0-15-40
104
102
0-13-00
101
Road
Total
02-47-10
0-11-00
(5)Sankarda River
833/2
0-01-50
838/4
0-44-06
838/3
841
0-53-70
395
(5 )Sankarda
373/3
0-20-80
Cart track
373/2
373/1
374/1
0-21-80
373-1
331/ 1 -p 0-11-80
368/3
0-02-60
370
0-08-30
368/2
Cart-track 0-03-10
369
0-19-00
363
0-07-80
362
0-13-00
Total
04-32-00
0-06-40
Vadodara Vadodara
783
784
0-11-50
785/1
0-80-50
786
0-23-50
760/2
761. 0-38-40
763
751/2
0-08-40
751/1
750/2
CT /NALA 0-09-70
422
0-01-50
410.
0-10-50
Road/CT 0-04-10
420
0-06-20
421
418/3
0-07-30
0-01-50
418/4
418/1
0-09-50
426
0-11-80
430
0-07-60
398/2
0-05-20
431/2
397
0-12-30
431/1
0-11-60
0-03-00
Cart-track
( 6) Rayka 102
103
104
0-11-00
105
Cart-track 0-01-50
Total
0-30-90
0-11-70 (7) Dodka 470/p - 1
474
0-14-60
472/p- 1
476
467
0-02-20
0-01-50
Cart-track
489
0-14-00
490
0-13-20
0-03-50
491
492 0-06-60
466
493
0-20-30
520
521
0-17-90
CT.
0-01-50
518
0-08-60
538
0-03-70
540
0-04-60
539
0-06-40
0-10-10
541
549
0-07-10 6719
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
545
Vadodara Vadodara (7) Dodka
0-07-80
542/p
0-03-50
544/p- 1
0-16-70
543
0-01-70
0-36-30
589
0-10-20
601
0-03-09
598
0-16-80
602
0-13-70
594/p
0-01-90
596
0-11-70
595
0-01-50
С.Т.
0-16-30
315
0-16-00
314
0-14-90
309
0-30-10
307/p- 1
0-08-50
305
306/p-1
0-23-80
291 /p- 1
0-02-60
290
0-03-80
Nala
0-23-20
286
0-17-30
285
284
Cart-track
0-20-40
230
231
0-19-50
229
Vadodara Savli
0-19-50
228
0-01-20
Cart-track
04-99-35
Total
(8) Poicha 433
0-10-80
434
0-15-40
435
448
0-09-80
438
0-29-40
447
0-27-45
440
0-25-20
441/1
442/1
0-01-50
Cart-track
0-14-20
357/1-2
5 4
3
0-30-40 (8) Poicha 351/ 1-2-3
0-01-50 Cart-track
0-20-30 278
277
0-24-40 276
0-21-05 269/p
0-01-50 Road
0-05-70 268
0-02-00 Cart-track
0-26-55 7/A
0-01-50 Road
0-12-90 8
0-12-50 9
0-18-40
10/2
0-10-20
37
0-01-50
Road
0-19-00
36
35
0-01-00
Cart-track
0-25-55
42/1
0-13-15
56
0-01-50
Cart-track
0-14-75
55/1
0-14-75
54
0-08-60
500/4
0-01-50
Nala
0-99-20
500/7
0-03-80
Nala
05-31-95
Total
(9) Khandi Road
0-22-80
8
0-10-90
9
10/1-2
0-05-80
59
0-11-90
60
0-05-58
61
0-07-92
63/1
0-01-50
65/2
0-18-63
66/1
0-21-50
83/1 -A
0-04-75
84/1
67/1
01-13-88
Total
[F. No. L- 14014/41/03-G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director 6720
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
1 नई दिल्ली, 22 सितम्बर , 2003
आनंद का०आ० 2922.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में सिसवा-रामोल पाइपलाइन परियोजना से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्था के साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिस में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूतिमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमिके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, दर्पण बिल्डिंग , आर ० सी० दत्त रोड, अल्कापुरी , वडोदरा-390 005 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला तहसील ग्राम
उ ०का० अ० के
नंबर/
ब्लाक जाने वाली भूमि
सर्वे नंबर
लिए अर्जित की (हैक्टेयर में) 1
2
3
4
5 आनंद
0-18-60 आनंद ( 10) आंकलाव- 4 वाडी
378
0-09-50
380/1
0-17-80
381
0-13-45
382
0-26-55
383
0-13-85
384
0-52-25
385
0-32-45
386/1-1
386/2-1
0-10-90
नाला
0-07-50
296
0-10-70
293
0-11-90
294
0-19-40
295/1
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] 2
3
4
5
आनंद
295/2
(10) आंकलाव-
वाडी
0-11-70
295/3
277
0-01-80
0-06-75
278/1
0-11-40
278/2
0-16-65
279
276
0-10-30
४
263
9-26-95
0-17-10
264/1
कार्टट्रेक 0-01-20
153
0-23-76
0-04-75
159/1
0-12-00
160/1
160/2
162
0-14-25
163
0-08-30
161
.0-00-70
164
150
0-03-05
148/1
0-22-05
मेटलरोड 0-04-75
147
0-26-55
169
0-19-05
केनाल
0-24-05
170/1
0-12-65
0-05-95
171/2
172
140/1
0-06-75
173/1
0-08-25
173/2
174/1
0-07-05
174/2
0-01-60
कार्टट्रेक
0-00-20
143/1-पैकी
केनाल
04-85-79
कुल:
(10-अ)
ग्राम पंचायत
राजुपुरा
लैन्ड
00-12-65
00-12-65
कुल:
भारत का सजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/ आस्विन 19, 1925 .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
1
5
3
2
4
1
आनंद
0-43-55 आनंद
609
(11) वेरावाडी
आनंद
0-03-15
कार्टट्रेक
606/2
619/1
0-08-00
619/2- पैकी
0-10-30
619/2-पैकी-3
619/4
0-11-50
0-11-80
619/5
0-08-80
619/6
0-01-95
618/2
0-04-75
620
0-07-50
621/ 1-1
0-08-50
621/1-2
0-00-65
621/2
0-05-10
623/1
623/2-3
0-02-35
कार्टट्रेक
0-03-55
585
0-10-80
563/1
0-12-50
563/2
0-10-40
563/3
0-11-90
563/4-1
0-09-80
563/4-2-पैकी
0-03-00
563/4-3पैकी
10-03-00
564/4-4पैकी
0-06-30
कार्टट्रेक
0-00-60
560/1-2
0-03-45
560/1-3
0-06-50
560/1-4
560/2
560/3
0-22-15
556
0-17-00
544/1
544/2
0-04-75
545/1
542/1
0-06-23
542/2
0-11-10
541
0-11-10
540
0-01-60
मेटलरोड
0-15-85
502/4
0-15-85
506
0-14-25
507/1-2
0-07-90
510/1
0-04-75
508/1
6721
5
4
3
2
0-06-35 आनंद
केनाल
(11 ) वेरा वाड़ी
0-16-60
508/2
0-03-15
498/2-2
0-30-10
497
0-03-15
कार्टट्रेक
0-08-70
435/3
0-02-35
436
437
0-11-10
ड्रोय/नाला
0-14-25
438/1
0-10-90
430/1
430/2
0-11-10
431/पैकी
0-15-25
429/1
0-18-00
429/ 1 ब
0-07-45
429/2
0-03-15
कार्टट्रेक
05-27-86
कुल
0-08-70
281/1 -पी
(12) रामनगर
0-04-75
250/1
0-32-50
251
0-04-75
253
0-03-15
कार्टट्रेक
0-11-10
247/1
0-01-10
246
0-20-60
245/1
0-02-35
240/2
0-17-40
242/1
0-02-35
कार्टट्रेक
0-32-05
203/1
202
0-20-60
204
0-12-65
205
0-15-85
206
0-04-85
176/1
0-01-10
कार्टट्रेक
0-26-90
175/1
0-28-50
173
0-03-15
कार्टट्रेक
02-61-40
कुल 6722
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
1
2
3
5 आनंद आनंद
2346
0-16-65 (13) सारसा
आनंद
0-05-75
कार्टट्रेक
2332
0-07-15
2333
0-04-75
2331
0-16-65
2334
2329
0-25-35
2327
0-10-30
केनल
0-11-10
2328
0-08-70
2164
0-12-65
2163
0-11-10
2162
0-22-20
2161
0-09-50
0-04-75
कार्टट्रेक
2154/1
0-06-35
2155
0-15-85
2152
0-09-50
2151
0-09-60
2144/1
0-09-50
2144/2
0-11-50
2146/1
0-04-75
2145
0-11-10
0-03-15
रोड़
0-45-00
कुल
198/1/2 0-19-80 (14) बेडका
200
0-23-75
209
210
0-31-65
कार्ट ट्रेक 0-02-35
0-78-35
कुल
कार्ट ट्रेक 0-02-35 (15) मोगर
305
0-16-65
306
0-12-65
307
0-17-40
309
0-06-75
308
0-16-40
कार्टट्रेक
0-3-95
324
0-26-70
334
0-15-85
333
0-13-45
335
0-19-00
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5
336
आनंद
0-20-40 (15 ) मोगर
कार्टट्रेक 0-02-35
369
370
0-18-60
371
0-04-75
364
363
0-31-70
360
0-25-35
361
0-19-80
कार्टट्रेक 0-02-35
405
0-11-90
404
0-34-03
403
0-04-75
408/2
0-08-70
नाला
0-11-90
408/1
0-09-50
कार्टट्रेक 0-01-06
03-59-13
कुल
0-01-60
कार्टट्रेक
(16) वागसी
161
0-23-75
164-पैकी
-10-09-50
165/1
0-32-10
205/1
0-36-45
201
0-07-90
200
0-03-15
187/1-2 0-10-30
188/1
0-08-35
185
186
0-01-55
89
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक 0-02-35
90
0-10-30
कार्टट्रेक 0-02-35
90
0-10-30
कार्टट्रेक 0-02-35
91
0-17-40
92/1
0-11-10
93/1
0-26-90
96/1
0-07-70
95
0-01-40
कार्टट्रेक 0-01-15
204
0-00-15
02-16-05
कुल 6723
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
आनंद आनंद
कार्टट्रेक
आनंद (17 ) चिखोदरा
आनंद
0-01-60
0-15-25
1517
0-13-20
1516/1
1516/2
0-08-15
1505
1504/3
0-10-50
1503/2
0-09-10
1502/2
1502/1
1501
0-03-15
1497/3
0-05-75
रास्ता
1500/1
1500/2
0-11-50
1499/1
1499/2
0-13-20
1490
1489/पैकी 0-09-40
0-10-00
1489/पैकी
0-04-50
1486/4
1486/5
0-08-95
1485
0-09-20
1484
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
0-12-20
0-18-85
1483/2
0-01-55
1262/1
0-22-35
1263/1
0-04-75
नाला
0-24-15
1264/1
0-15-85
1265
0-01-55
1266
0-03-15
1267/2
0-02-35
कार्टट्रेक
0-13-10
1447/1-2-3
0-06-35
1448
0-17-85
1442
0-01-55
1445
0-13-10
1441
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
0-08-90
1429
0-08-90
1428/ 1-1
0-15-00
1427/1
0-01-25
1427/2
0-01-55
1421
5
4
3
1423/1
(17) चिखोदरा
1423/2
0-07-30
1422/2
0-23-00
रास्ता
0-19-40
710/3
0-13-75
708/3
0-04-50
721/1
721/2
723
0-03-15
0-04-75
724
0-19-95
723/2
725/3
0-01-55
749
0-19-50
746
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
0-04-75
791
0-07-90
810
0-13-15
790
811, 812,
0-11-25
813, 814/पैकी
0-08-90
815
0-10-55
816/2
0-15-60
817/पैकी
0-04-40
कार्टट्रेक
0-35-10
663
0-28-35
596,597
0-01-55
598
0-21-70
599/पैकी
0-16-05
601/3
0-01-85
601/4-1
0-27-15
607
0-13-15
609
0-08-95
612
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
0-16-25
613,614
0-11-10
620
0-01-55
621
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
549
0-04-75
548
0-15-20
547
0-05-70
नाला
546/3-ए 6724
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 आणद आणद (17) चिखोदरा 546/3 -बी
546/4
0-09-10
कारट्रेक 0-01-55
कुल:
08-12-25
(18) सामरखा 1097
0-11-60
1080/4 0-37-20
1081/1
1083/1
0-00-25
1083/2
0-19-00
1083/3
0-19-00
कारट्रेक 0-01-55
1085
0-11-90
1084
0-01-55
रेलवे
0-04-75
1427/1
1428
0-25-60
1430/1
0-04-50
1430/2
0-06-50
1429
0-03-15
कारट्रेक 0-01-55
1057
0-03-15
केनाल
0-18-25
1054
0-08-90
1053
0-01-55
1055
0-03-15
1052
0-01-55
1043/1-2 0-25-00
1043/1-3 0-12-40
1037/पैकी 0-03-15
1036/पैकी 0-21-80
1036/पैकी 0-29-00
1033/1
0-01-55
कारट्रेक
1032/5
0-08-90
1032/6
1032/7
1031
0-15-60
1012/3
1015/1
0-25-60
1015/2
0-22-00
1014
कारट्रेक
0-03-15
d
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 2
3
5
आणद आणद
0-35-10 (18) सामरखा 955/पैकी
कार्टट्रेक 0-03-15
764
0-03-15
765/ 1-1 0-07-90
769/1
769+770/2 0-06-55
769/1-4 0-05-00
769/3
769/4
0-06-15
रोड
0-16-60
नाला
0-03-15
768/पैकी 0-01-55
771
0-07-40
772/1
0-08-90
कार्टट्रेक 0-03-15
512/1
0-09-90
0-12-10
512/2
512/3
513
0-13-10
514/2
0-01-55
515
0-04-75
573/1
0-07-30
518
0-00-15
519
0-07-36
520/1
0-05-75
521
0-14-10
522
0-03-15
523
568
0-11-50
567
0-03-15
524/पैकी 0-06-10
524/पैकी 0-07-10
525/2
0-05-75
525/3
0-19-00
525/4
525/5
केनाल
0-05-75
456/5
0-19-25
455/2
0-09-90
453/6
0-04-75
451
0-03-15
कार्टट्रेक 0-04-75 69250
MAR
UTTANAG
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2
3 142 5
5
1
4
3
2
1
कार्टट्रेक0-01-551
0-19-25
आनंद (19) बोरीगामी
आनंद
आनंद
445/पैकी
आनंद
(18) सामरखा
712
0-03-15
कार्टट्रेक
0-48-70
711
0-15-65
307/1
171610-36-20
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
717аспівакция 20-00-50
а во лепотир
0-16-65
327/2
737/10-07-30 326/4, 6,
735/23001-55
0-36-70
7+8
0-04-75
736
0-29-70
325/पैकी
90-07-30
شه
0-40-80
323
91910-27-30
0-03-15
321
0-35-30
922/अ
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
9210-07-30
евый
0-03-15
313/1
-59270001-55
0-18-80
केनाल
0-31-68
0-06-35
315/1
0-25-34
1015
0-03-15
316/2
0-07-92
1016
0-01-55
कार्टट्रेक
0-12-67
नाला
08-50-25
कुल:
0-20-59
1124
0-03-99
0-26-92
1123
481/1
(19) बोरीयानी
1122
0-00-15
481/2
0-28-51
0-15-20
1121/1
479/2
0-19-00
1119
0-17-80
480/2
0-30-09
1120
0-13-60
472/2
0-02-37
1103/1
0-13-10
493/2
0-02-50
0-24-15
1104
491/492
0-28-51
0-01-55
1102
495
1101
कार्टट्रेक
0-12-67
1098
0-37-25
812
0-26-92
1100
0-15-20
811/1-1
0-04-75
कार्टट्रेक
0-03-15
779
0-18-21
1218
0-01-55
810
0-01-55
0-01-55 780/1
कार्टट्रेक
0-13-10
773/2
07-02-95
कुल
0-22-35
772/1
[फा. सं. एल. -14014/41/2003-जी.पी. ] 772/2
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
0-04-75
769/1
0-06-35
768/2
New Delhi , the 22nd September, 2003
0-01-55
770/1
1370,
0-04-75
1373,
1374
0-08-50
767/1
767/2
S.O. 2922.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from Sisva- Ramol pipeline project in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
2803 GI/ 2003-13 6726
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 / ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
1
2
3
4
5
0-26-95
Anand Anand
263
( 11 ) Aankla-
vadi
264/1
0-17-10 Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
С.Т.
0-01-20
153
0-23-76
159/1
0-04-75
160/1
0-12-00
160/2
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein. Any person interested in the land described in the
162
0-14-25
163
0-08-30
161
164
150
0-03-95
148/1
0-22-95
Mattel Road 0-04-75 said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date onwhich the coples of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited, Darpan Building, R.C. Dutt Road , Alkapuri , Vadodara-390005 (Gujarat)
147
0-26-55 SCHEDULE
169
0-19-05 Distt. Tehsil Village
Canal
0-24-05
170/1
0-12-65 No. Block No. Survey Land to be acquired for R.O.U. in Hectares
171/2
0-05-95 1
2
172
3
4
5
140/1
0-06-75 Anand Anand ( 10) Aanklavadi 4
0-18-60
173/1
0-08-25 378
0-09-50
173/2
380/1
0-17-80
4/1
0-07-05 381
0-13-45
174/2
382
0-26-55
C.T.
0-01-60 383
0-13-85
384
0-52-25
143/1 -p
385
Canal
0-32-45
386/1-1
04-85-79
Total:
386/2-1
0-10-90
(10-A)
Nala
0-07-50
Gram-
Rajupura
296
0-10-70
Pan-
293
chayat
0-11-90
Land
00-12-65 294
0-19-40
Total: 00-12-65 295/1
295/2
0-43-55
(11 ) Vahera- 609
khadi
C.T.
0-03-15 295/3
0-11-70
606/2
277
0-01-80
619/1
C.T.
0-06-75
0-08-00
619/2 -p
278/1
0-11-40
0-10-30
619/2-p- 3 278/2
619/4
0-11-50 279
0-16-65
619/5
0-11-80 276
0-10-30
619/6
0-08-80 6727 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
Anand (11) Vahera-
Anand
0-01-95
618/2
Anand (11 ) Vahera-
Anand
437
khadi
0-04-75
620
khadi
0-11-10
Nala
0-07-50
621/ 1-1
0-14-25
438/1
0-08-50
621/ 1-2
0-10-90
430/1
0-00-65
621/2
430/2
0-05-10
623/1
0-11-10
431/p
623/2+3
0-15-25
429/1
0-02-35
C.T.
0-18-00
429/1-B
0-03-55
585
0-07-45
429/2
0-10-80
563/1
0-03-15
C.T.
0-12-50
563/2
05-27-86
Total:
0-10-40
563/3
0-08-70
0-11-90
563/4-1
(12) Ramnagar 281/ 1 -p
0-04-75
250/1
0-09-80
563/4-2p
0-32-50
251
563/4-3p 0-03-00
0-04-75
253
564/4-4p
0-03-15
0-06-30
C.T.
С.Т.
0-11-10
247/1
0-00-60
560/1-2
0-01-10
246
0-03-45
560/1-3
0-20-60
245/1
0-06-50
560/1-4
0-02-35
240/2 560/2
0-17-40
242/1
560/3
0-02-35
C.T.
0-22-15
556
0-32-05
203/1
0-17-00
544/1
202
544/2
0-20-60
204
0-04-75
545/1
0-12-65
205
0-01-10
542/1
0-15-85
206
0-06-23
542/2
0-04-85
176/1
0-11-10
541
0-01-10
C.T.
0-11-10
540
0-26-90
175/1 Mettel
0-28-50
0-01-60
173
Road
0-03-15
0-15-85
502/4
C.T.
0-15-85
506
02-61-40
Total
0-14-25
507/1(2)
0-16-65
2346
(13) Sarsa
0-07-90
510/1
0-05-75
C.T.
0-04-75
508/1
0-07-15
2332
0-06-35
Canal
0-04-75
2333
0-16-60
508/2
0-16-65
2331
0-03-15
498/2-2
2334
0-30-10
497
0-25-35
2329
0-03-15
C.T.
0-10-30
2327
0-08-70
435/3
0-11-10
Canal
0-02-35
436 6728
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
I
2
3
4
5
1 Anand Anand
2328
(13) Sarsa
[PART II-SEC 3 ( ⅱ) ] 2
3
4
5
0-34-03
0-08-70 Anand Anand
2164
(Contd .)
0-12-65
2163
0-11-10
2162
0-22-20
2161
0-09-50
0-04-75
2154/1
0-06-35
2155
0-15-85
2152
0-09-50
2151
0-09-60
2144/1
0-09-50
2144/2
0-11-50
2146/1
0-04-75
2145
0-11-10
Road
0-03-15
Total: 02-45-00
198/ 1-2
(14)Bedva
0-19-80
200
0-23-75
209
210
0-31-65
C.T.
0-02-35
0-78-35
Total:
Cart-track
(15) Mogar
0-02-35
305
0-16-65
306
0-12-65
307
0-17-40
309
0-06-75
308
0-16-40
С.Т.
0-03-95
324
0-26-70
334
0-15-85
333
0-13-45
335
0-19-00
336
0-20-40
CT
0-02-35
369
370
0-18-60
371
0-04-75
364
363
0-31-70
360
0-25-35
361
0-19-80
C.T.
0-02-35
405
0-11-90 ( 15) Mogar 404.
(Contd.)
0-04-75
3.403
408/2
0-08-70
Nala
0-11-90
0-09-50
403/1
C.T.
0-01-60
Total : 03-59-13
С.Т.
0-01-60 (16) Vaghasi
161
0-23-75
0-09-50
164./p1
165/1
0-32-10
205/1
0-36-45
201
0-07-90
200
0-03-15
187/1-2 0-10-30
188/1
0-08-35
185
186
0-01-55
89
0-01-55
C.T.
0-02-35
90
0-10-30
CT.
0-02-35
91
0-17-40
92/1
0-11-10
93/1
0-26-90
96/1
0-07-70
95
С.Т.
0-01-40
204
0-00-15
Total : 02-16-05 ( 17) Chikho- С.Т.
0-01-60 dara
1517
0-15-25
1516/1
0-13-20
1516/2
1505
0-08-15
1504/3
0-10-50
1503/2
1502/2
0-09-10
1502/1
1501
1497/3
0-03-15
Road
0-05-75
1500/1
1500/2
1499/1
0-11-50 6729 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/ आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
0-01-55
C.T.
17) Chikho-
Anand Anand
1499/2
( 17) Chikho
Anand
Anand
0-04-75
dara-Contd . 791
0-13-20
1490
dara-Contd.,
0-07-90
810
0-09-40
1489/p
0-13-15
790
1489/p
811+812+
0-04-50
1486/4
0-11-25
813+814/p
0-06-30
1486/5
0-08-90
815
0-08-95
1485
0-10-55
816/2
0-09-20
1484
0-15-60
817/p
0-01-55
C.T.
0-04-40
C.T.
0-12-20
Nala
0-35-10
663
0-18-85
1483/2
0-28-35
596+597
0-01-55
1262/1
0-01-55
598
0-22-35
1263/1
0-21-70
599/p
0-04-75
0-16-05 Nala
601/3
0-24-15
0-01-85 1264/1
601/4-1
0-15-85
0-27-15 1265
607
0-01-55
0-13-15 1266
609
0-03-15
0-08-95
612
1267/2
0-01-55
0-02-35
С.Т.
C.T.
0-16-25
613+614
0-13-10
1447/1+2+3
0-11-10
0-06-35
620
1448
0-01-55
621
0-17-85
1442
0-01-55
C.T.
0-01-55
1445
0-13-10
549
1441
0-04-75
548
0-01-55
С.Т.
0-15-20
547/1
0-08-90
1429
0-05-70
Nala
0-08-90
1428/1-1
546/3-A
0-15-00
1427/1
546/3-B 1427/2
0-09-10
0-01-25
546/4
0-01-55
1421
0-01-55
C.T.
1423/1
08-12-25 1423/2
Total:
0-07-30
1422/2
0-11-60
(18) Samarkha 1097
00-23-00
Road
0-37-20
1080/4
0-19-40
710/3
1081/1
0-13-75
708/3
0-00-25
1083/1
0-04-50
721/1
0-19-00
1083/2
721/2
0-19-00
1083/3
0-03-15
723
0-01-55
CT
0-04-75
724
0-11-90
1085
0-19-95
725/2
0-01-55
1084
725/3
0-04-75
RLY
0-01-55
749
1427/1
0-19-50
746 6730
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
5
1
2
3
4
5 Anand Anand (18) Samarkha 1428
0-25-60 Anand Anand ( 18) Samarkha 512/3
1430/1
0-04-50
513
0-13-10 1430/2
0-06-50
514/2
0-01-55 1429
0-03-15
515
0-04-75 C.T.
0-01-55
573/1
0-07-30 1057
0-03-15
518
0-00-15 Canal
0-18-25
519
0-07-36 1054
0-08-90
520/1
0-05-75 1053
0-01-55
521
0-14-10 1055
522
0-03-15
0-03-15 1052
523
0-01-55
568
1043/1-2 0-25-00
0-11-50
567
1043/1-3
0-03-15
0-12-40
524/p
0-06-10
0-03-15
1037/p
0-07-10
524/p
0-21-80
1036/p
525/2
0-05-75 1036/0
0-29-00
525/3
0-19-00 1033/1
525/4
C.T.
0-01-55
525/5
1032/5
0-08-90
Canal
0-05-75 1032/6
456/5
0-19-25 1032/7
455/2
0-09-90 1031
0-15-60
453/6
0-04-75 1012/3
451
0-03-15 1015/1
0-25-60
C.T.
0-04-75 1015/2
0-22-00
445/Paiki 0-19-25 1014
C.T.
0-03-15 CT.
0-03-15
307/1
0-15-65 955/p
0-35-10
C.T.
0-01-55 C.T.
0-03-15
327/2
0-16-65 764
0-03-15
326/4*+6
765/1-1
7+8
0-07-90
0-36-70 769/1
0-29-70
325/p
323
0-40-80 769+770/2 0-06-55
321
769/1+4
0-03-15
C.T.
0-01-55 769/3
313/1
0-03-15 769/4
0-06-15
Canal
0-18-80 Road
0-16-60
315/1
0-06-35 Nala
0-03-15
316/2
0-03-15 768/p
0-01-55
Cart-Track 0-01-55 771
0-07-40
Total:
772/1
08-50-25
0-08-90
481/1
(19) Boriavi
C.T.
0-03-15
481/2
0-00-15 512/1
0-09-90
479/2
0-15-20 512/2
0-12-10
480/2
0-17-80 6731 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/अश्विन19 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
5
3.
4
2
5
1
4
1
2
3
0-13-60
Anand
1101
( 19) Boriavi
Anand
Anand ( 19) Boriavi 472/2
Anand
0-12-67
1098
0-13-10
493/2
0-26-92
1100
0-24-15
491+492
0-04-75
С.Т.
0-01-55
495
0-18-21
1218
C.T.
0-01-55
C.T.
0-37-25
812
0-15-20
811/ 1-1
07-02-95
TOTAL
0-03-15
779
[F. No. L- 14014/41/2003 -G.P. ]
0-01-55
810
SWAMI SINGH, Director
0-01-55
780/1
नई दिल्ली, 22 सितम्बर, 2003
0-13-10
773/2
0-22-35
772/1
772/2
769/1
0-04-75
768/2
0-06-35
0-01-55
770/1
का.आ. 2923.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में सिसवा- रामोल पाइपलाइन परियोजना से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्था के साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
1370+1374+
0-04-75
1373
0-08-50
767/1
767/2
0-01-55
C.T.
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिस में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
0-01-55
712
0-48-70
711
0-36-20
716/1
717
0-07-30
737/1
0-01-55
735/2+3
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
0-04-75
736
0-07-90
Road
0-27-30
919
0-35-30
922/A
0-07-30
921
0-01-55
927
0-31-68
928
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, दर्पण बिल्डिंग , आर. सी. दत्त रोड, अल्कापुरी, वडोदरा -390 005 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
0-25-34
1015
अनुसूची
0-07-92
1016
0-12-67
Nala
उ.का.अ. के
सर्वे
ग्राम
जिला तहसील
0-20-59
1124
नंबर लिए अर्जित
0-26-92
1123
कीजाने
ब्लाक 1122
नंबर वाली भूमि
0-28-51
1121/1
(हैक्टेयर में)
0-19-00
1119
4
5
2
3
1
0-30-09
1120
0-05-15 .
2302
खेडा (20 ) चकलासी
नडीयाद
0-02-37
1103/1
0-22-64 .
2301
0-02-50
1104
0-15-64
2300
0-28-51
1102 6732
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART HSEC. 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
5
1
2
3
4
5 खेडा
नडीवाद
खेडा
नडीयाद
0-00-84 (20) चकलासी जारी
0-31-61
2298
(20) चकलासी- जारी कार्टट्रेक 2294
0-06-87
रास्ता
2268
296
0-11-40
0-27-92 2284
305
0-16-89
0-19-33 2283
0-28-10
कार्टट्रेक 0-00-80 2281
0-04-45
306/1
0-06-28 2282
0-11-05
केनल 0-01-01 547
0-15-55
306
0-08-21 केनल/ 0-10-61
४
308
0-13-98 कार्टट्रेक
309
0-03-07 545
0-12-41
319
0-09-41
0-28-28
1510
318
0-26-25 केनल
रास्ता
509
0-01-87
352
0-12-64 513
0-17-50
351
0-08-29 1
358
कार्टट्रेक
0-05-72 490
359
0-03-69
0-09-15 :
360
489
0-08-21
0-35-58
361
488-
0-02-61
0-01-93
2299
487
0-91-51
477
2267
0-00-15
0-16-88
544
479
0-00-25
0-14-82
512
478
0-07-21
0-00-24
426
0-00-28 : रास्ता
215
458
0-04-65
298
457
0-13-34
:
459
0-40-92
09-37-85
कुल
454
0-09-15
[फा. सं. एल-14014/41/2003-जी. पी. ] 432/2 0-12-21
स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक 430/2 0-98-99
New Delhi , the 22nd September, 2003 429
0-19-92
428
0-11-20
423
0-07-92
427/1
0-11-13
रास्ता
227
0-14-71
S.O. 2923. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from Sisva- Ramol pipeline project in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;
223
0-10-70
222
0-28-00
220
0-12-53
221
0-06-03
217
0-16-82
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
216
0-08-73
282
0-03-97
297
0-31-85
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) 6733 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/ आश्विन 19 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
5
4
2
3
1
Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
0-12-21
432/2
Nadiad Kheda
0-98-99
430/2
(20) Chaklasi -(Contd.)
0-19-92
429
0-11-20
428
0-07-92
423
0-11-13
427/1
Road
0-14-71
227
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, Darpan Building, R.C. Dutt Road, Alkapuri, Vadodara- 390005 (Gujarat) .
0-10-70
223
SCHEDULE
0-28-00
222
Distt. Tehsil Village
0-12-53
220
0-06-03
221
0-16-82 Survey No./ Block No.
217
Land to be acquired for R.O.U. in Hectares
0-08-73
216
4
5
3
2
1
0-03-97
282
0-05-15
Kheda
2302
Nadiad
(20) Chaklasi
0-31-85
297
0-22-64
2301
0-00-84
C.T.
0-15-64
2300
Road
0-31-61
2298
0-27-92
296
0-06-87
2294
0-19-33
305
0-11-40
2268
CT.
0-16-89
2284
0-06-28
306/1
0-28-10
2283
0-01-01
Canal
0-04-45
2281
0-08-21
306
0-11-05
2282
0-13-98
308
0-15-55
547
0-03-07
309
0-01-61
Canal/C.T.
0-09-41
319
0-12-41
545
0-26-25
318
0-28-28
510
Road
Canal
0-12-64
352
0-01-87
509
0-08-29
351
0-17-50
513
0-05-72
358
CT.
0-09-15
359
0-03-69
0-08-21 490
360
0-02-61
0-35-58
361
489
2299
0-01-93
488
0-00-15
2267
0-91-51
487
0-00-25
544
0-16-88
477
0-00-24
512
0-14-82
479
0-00-28
426
0-07-21
478
215
Road
298
0-04-65
458
TOTAL 09-37-85
0-13-34
457
0-40-92
459
[F. No. L- 14014/ 41/2003 -G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director
0-09-15
454
2803 GI/2003-14 6734
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
1 नई दिल्ली, 22 सितम्बर, 2003
खेडा का.आ. 2924.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में सिसवा- रामोल पाइपलाइन परियोजना से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्थाके साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि, में जिस में ठक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां सांधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, अनुसूची गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, दर्पण बिल्डिंग, आर. सी. दत्त रोड, अल्कापुरी, वडोदरा -390 005 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । जिला तहसील ग्राम
सर्वे नंबर/
उ.का.अ.
ब्लोक
केलिए
नंबर अर्जितकी
जाने वाली
भूमि (हैक्टेयरमें) 1
2
3
4
5
खेडा
818
नडीयाद ( 21 ) उत्तरसंडा
0-19-89
819
0-01-98
813
0-24-21
812
0-06-35
788
0-14-53
791
0-09-56
789
0-03-11
790
0-03-49
रास्ता
784
0-16-17
769
0-15-14
783
0-03-71
697
0-11-57
698
0-25-67
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] 2
3
4
5 नडीयाद
नाला
605
( 21 ) उत्तरसंडा (जारी)
0-12-78
603
0-08-37
593
0-03-05
594
0-10-41
595
0-09-04
588
0-06-65
587
0-08-88
580
0-03-35
581
0-07-39
579
0-01-94
543
0-97-47
544
0-08-34
538
0-18-07
536
0-09-99
497
0-14-53
518
0-65-79
517
0-02-57
516
0-07-26
520
0-07-72
515
0-01-83
521
0-19-81
523
0-03-14
524
0-05-87
525
0-09-04
586
582
0-01-80
539
496
522
05-04-27
कुल
38
0-31-57 (22) फतेपुर
49
0-13-73
48
0-04-42
53
0-10-78
कारट्रेक
54
0-12-62
56
0-02-32
60
0-27-67
61
0-05-59
कारट्रेक
62
0-09-49
207
0-03-02
205
0-13-81
239
0-04-25 6735 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
2
4
1
3
2047
खेडा
कारट्रेक
खेडा
नडीयाद ( 24 ) नडीयाद
नडीयाद ( 22 ) फतेपुर
0-12-06
2046
0-08-05
301
(जारी)
(जारी)
2045
0-16-14
0-03-56
302
0-12-70
2041
303
0-01-90
0-03-85
2042
304
0-16-10
2039
0-03-16
कारट्रेक
0-00-81
केनल
02-38-64
कुल
0-03-37
2036
0-25-22
0-07-16 486
2035
(23) सलूनवांटा
0-02-61
केनल
रास्ता
-0-22-57
0-28-97
490
1986
0-26-12
1985
0-18-18
493
0-19-87
0-18-07
497
1977
0-14-01
0-22-99
496
1968
0-11-57
1966
0-01-11
ड्रेइन
0-16-10
1964
0-19-30
507/ए
0-02-82
1963
कारट्रेक
0-03-12
1963/पी
0-31-87
607
कारट्रेक
0-02-56
507/3
0-02-09
1940
0-03-04
606
0-12-59
1941
0-14-03
605
0-09-54
1945
0-03-06
604
0-11-54
1944
0-23-24
600
0-10-05
1943
0-14-70
559
0-05-79
1832
0-26-09
570
0-06-37
1834
0-03-40
569
0-04-72
1833
02-59-27
कुल
कारट्रेक
0-19-38
0-10-94
1829 1551
(24) नडीयाद
0-16-52
1828 कारट्रेक
0-11-07
1825
0-25-97
1550
0-18-87
1824
1549
0-02-76
0-19-09
1673
0-26-36
1545
कारट्रेक
0-17-68
1542
0-24-16
केनल
1487
0-06-21
1689
0-09-02
1488
0-08-20
1486
रास्ता
1480
0-14-57
0-11-77
1689
0-04-92
0-10-97
1684
1481
0-13-45
0-20-88
1686
1479
0-15-93
0-31-16
1478
2053
0-02-72
1477
0-05-09
रास्ता
0-25-10
1473
0-24-21
2054
0-09-25
1472
0-00-75
2078
0-04-41
2069 कारट्रेक 6736
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
1
2
5
3
4
4
5 खेडा
2070
खेडा
0-09-41
नडीयाद (24 ) नडीयाद
208
0-11-54
नडीयाद ( 26 ) बीलोड्रा
2071
0-06-96
207
(जारी)
0-06-38 2073
0-00-96
182
0-06-70 2063
0-04-01
183
0-06-06 2064
0-11-49
184
0-06-85 2067
0-16-97
185
0-05-08 2040
189
0-04-07 1978
201
0-04-52 1687
186
0-05-06
07-40-37
कुल
कार्टट्रेक 0-02-40
200
0-15-38 (25) मरीडा कार्टट्रेक
371
0-05-28 134/4
0-20-63
212
135
0-11-27
199
कार्टट्रेक
02-15-20
कुल
0-33-50
कुल
नदी
(27) अलाजडा
0-17-72
नदी
0-10-61
(26) बीलोड्रा
212
0-06-50
428
0-15-61
211
0-35-77
429
0-22-83
218
0-27-97
411
0-18-99
217
0-08-33
422
0-01-62
223
0-13-90
418
0-12-56
224
0-13-39
415
0-03-84
225
0-04-10
417
0-06-11
रास्ता
0-06-40 कार्टट्रेक
237
0-19-35
305
0-12-14
236
0-22-37
306
0-02-15
235
0-06-95
307
0-03-73
234
0-00-73 नाला
0-01-01
233
0-13-00
336
0-02-64
232
0-14-83
308
0-03-65
251
0-08-40 308/पी
0-07-46
250
0-11-87
334
0-09-06
0-02-47
249
332
0-07-54
कार्टट्रेक
0-07-54
362
0-09-56
115
0-11-73
363
0-07-67
114
0-00-11
364
0-05-32
116
0-04-58
361
0-02-30
117
0-25-06 .
0-03-36
365
118
0-05-18 कार्टट्रेक
124
0-29-79
367
0-09-93
120
0-07-14 रास्ता
0-09-40
122
0-03-92
211
0-07-24
123
0-16-34
146
0-01-94
119
रेलवे 0-06-80
03-55-14 210
0-11-50
कुल 6737 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
4
3
2
5
1
4
3
2
1
0-13-70
690
महेमदाबाद ( 29 ) वरसोला
खेडा
केनल
खेडा नडीयाद ( 28 ) अरेरा
0-03-56
705
0-58-11
199
(जारी)
0-02-42
702 कार्टट्रेक
0-40-57
704
0-08-68
216
0-22-09
706
0-06-40
रास्ता
0-19-50
707
0-19-67
196
0-12-10
708
0-13-78
196/पी
0-06-30
709
0-08-14
195
नाला
0-25-23
190
0-16-64
799
0-17-45
184
0-09-65
798
0-01-40
183
0-09-02
715
0-11-44
182
0-03-03
715/पी
0-08-40
रास्ता
0-17-92
796
0-35-16
166
0-12-39
795
0-00-95
165
0-11-79
794
0-25-51
138
0-19-49
896
0-10-68
137
0-09-02
895
0-06-30
141
0-18-37
851
0-08-40
रास्ता
0-00-72
894
0-40-54
0-15-34
889
110
0-26-99
0-09-51
859
109
0-01-50
0-18-07
869
108
0-12-84
0-23-94
868
101
0-03-11
0-15-81
338
102
0-16-16
103
नाला
0-02-37
85
0-15-51
339
0-25-12
84
0-19-38
340
0-15-50
65
0-06-40
रास्ता
0-31-21
64
0-28-17
358
0-14-06
61
0-34-75
358/पी
0-08-99
47
0-09-01
359
0-04-25
46
0-01-80
कार्टट्रेक
0-18-38
34
0-11-27
405
0-04-07
50
0-02-72
406
0-02-30
33
0-10-74
404
0-23-31
31
0-22-53
411
0-24-31
30
0-29-95
.403
0-24-23
30
0-20-09
397
0-18-59
28
0-04-03
399
0-10-05
27
0-01-15
398
0-11-96
394
05-75-33
कुल
0-08-40
रास्ता
कार्टट्रेक
महेमदाबाद ( 29 ) वरसोला
खेडा
0-15-73
452
0-25-26
672
0-11-07
468
0-13-09
673
0-12-76
470
केनल 6738
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
470/पी
खेडा महेमदाबाद ( 29 ) बरसोला
0-09-92
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 2
3
4
5
खेडा नडीयाद
463
0-06-75
460
0-11-80
459
0-04-60
459/पी
0-00-26
458
0-11-40
609
0-34-76
610
0-21-69
620
0-23-41
612
0-01-60
850
893
0-01-12
08-38-54
कुल
खेडा नडीयाद ( 30 ) देवकी- 1127
0-06-40
वानसोल 1126
0-04-53
1122
0-01-36
1124
0-12-06
1123
0-01-77
1126
0-00-88
1111
0-20-98
1112
0-01-80
1109
0-08-68
1103
0-01-28
1106
0-04-72
1106
0-14-79
तलाव
1104
0-01-98
1113
0-00-35
01-45-60
कुल
खेडा महेमदाबाद ( 31 ) वानंथावली 1934
0-16-49
1960
0-08-65
1931
0-08-39
रोड़ (रास्ता)
0-06-40
1915
0-21-52
1916
0-15-29
1909
0-10-68
1910
0-07-50
रास्ता
0-08-04
1905
0-10-16
1906
0-05-51
1899
0-14-70
1898
0-03-34
1897
0-02-69
1935
01-39-82
कुल
अरेरी 25
( 32 ) अरेरी
0-19-18
20
0-03-99
8
0-16-02
7
0-13-00
342
0-12-56
रास्ता
0-06-84
343
0-16-25
346
0-62-14
केनल 0-03-82
234
0-28-04
232
0-20-04
279
0-53-30
220
0-02-83
केनल
0-10-18
212
0-04-78
208
0-07-47
215
0-17-47
216
0-17-63
407
0-22-94
189
0-19-26
186
0-01-57
173
0-17-72
174
0-09-80
176
0-04-58
177
0-07-35
176
0-09-15
408
0-07-10
04-05-91
कुल
777
खेडा महेमदाबाद ( 33) खतराज
0-04-29
कार्टट्रेक
773
0-18-10
772
0-03-28
768
0-04-29
770
0-21-30
769
0-01-33
नाला
908
0-10-16
910
0-04-04
911
0-10-02
नदी
46
0-07-38
67
0-12-36
72
0-10-12
65
0-09-08
61
0-05-31 6739 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
1
2
0-07-55
47
महेमदाबाद ( 34 ) सोजाली
0-06-25 खेडा
60
महेमदाबाद ( 33 ) खतराज
खेडा
0-05-07
48
0-06-52
62/ए
0-16-29
241
0-06-64
62/बौ
केनल
0-14-64
56
0-14-66
34/ए
कार्टट्रेक
0-19-80
34/बी
0-10-99
114
0-01-86
27
0-03-54
115
0-28-08
33
0-10-38
117
0-02-25
32
0-04-36
120
0-03-72
185
0-00-26
119
0-02-48
187
0-15-63
125
0-21-08
188
कार्टट्रेक
0-02-61
189
0-18-90
126
0-11-84
195
0-13-83
128
0-06-37
194
0-26-84
139
0-00-43
190
0-01-92
141
0.08-75
193
0-06-40
रास्ता
02-96-09
कुल
0-21-30
799
0-08-50
288
0-04-97
798
(35)घोडाली
0-13-23
218
0-06-40
रास्ता
0-23-24
239
0-25-48
818
0-16-45
234/बी
0-19-71
819
0-14-82
263
0-06-43
820
0-08-14
226
0-00-53
781
0-25-83
231
0-14-60
780
0-08-68
227
0-02-07
779
0-08-94
289
0-13-15
778
0-02-40
0-10-50
रास्ता
0-10-75
204
04-63-32
कुल
0-12-21
197
0-04-74
112
(34)सोजाली
0-28-03
198
0-05-96
112/पी
0-25-92
200
0-10-40
113
0-16-57
139
0-07-90
113/पी
0-06-40
रास्ता
0-13-86 कार्टट्रेक
103
0-00-66
0-03-18
114
106
0-01-84
0-06-40
104
रास्ता
0-23-22
105
0-14-36
140
0-06-77
कार्टट्रेक
141
0-15-39
99
0-18-84
51/ए
0-26-16
78
0-11-18
52
0-00-99
98
0-11-28
53
0-18-22
79
0-03-27
43
0-18-49
64
0-02-53
45
0-08-08
85
0-04-33
46 6740
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 1
2
3
5
1
2
3
4
5 खेडा महेमदाबाद ( 35 ) घोडाली
65
0-00-14 खेडा महेमदाबाद (37 ) अमसारमन 232
0-11-27 कारट्रेक
234
0-17-75 225
235
0-41-03
कुल 02-28-33
03-56-06
कुल
(38) रोहीसा
11
(36) मोडज
1012
0-09-03
0-11-47
453
0-53-85 1010
0-04-27
452
0-38-47 1011
0-05-88
441
0-48-85 1015
0-01-21
456
0-12-22 1016
0-25-25
442
0-01-70 1029
0-03-92
443
0-35-61 रास्ता
449
0-08-40
0-02-93
444
1026
0-29-76
0-17-98
441
0-20-81 1043
0-22-93
349
0-09-23 1061
437
0-11-20 1043
0-01-31
436
0-40-77 1059
0-09-56
395
0-18-34 1062
0-00-69
393
0-28-13 1063
0-11-32
03-61-00
कुल
1064
0-08-24
(39) रास्का
नदी
0-22-29 1043
0-06-85
673
0-60-04 991
674
0-08-36
01-44-60
कुल
कार्टट्रेक
0-05-27 157
(37) अमसारवन
435
0-23-02
0-09-96 172
0-10-37
केनाल
0-29-91 173
434
0-10-92
0-17-17
432
0-12-45 582/ए
0-02-12
कार्टट्रेक
0-36-44 174/ए
0-08-60
431
0-01-20 527
0-01-48
433
0-07-34 580
0-08-44
429
0-37-71 601
0-01-13
425
0-01-50 500
0-05-76
427
0-37-92 509
0-00-26
375
0-17-85 528
0-08-26
422
0-37-31 586
0-02-75
411
0-03-59 528
409
0-12-02
0-19-32
410
182
0-03-80
0-15-56
406
181
0-16-70
0-17-09
414
226
0-21-54
0-11-34
415
0-09-09 553
0-01-97
396
0-16-86 224
0-00-27
395
0-07-67 225
0-07-95
682
0-31-50 502
0-04-96
04-84-65 221
कुल
0-12-54
रास्ता
[फा. सं . एल. -14014/41/ 2003 - जी.पी. ]
0-08-84
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 6741 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
5
3
1
2
New Delhi , the 22nd September, 2003
0-03-05
593
Kheda Nadiad (21 ) Utarsanda
0-10-41
594
0-09-04
595
0-06-65
588
0-08-88
587
S.O. 2924.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from Sisva-Ramol pipeline project in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
0-03-35
580
0-07-39
581
579
0-01-94
0-97-47
543
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;
0-08-34
544
0-18-07
538
0-09-99
536
0-14-53
497
0-65-79
518
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
0-02-57
517
0-07-26
516
0-07-72
520
0-01-83
515
0-19-81
521
0-03-14
523
0-05-87
524
0-09-04
525
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one-days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority , GAIL (India) Limited, Darpan Building , R.C. Dutt Road, Alkapuri , Vadodara - 390 005 (Gujarat).
586
SCHEDULE
0-01-80
582
Landto
Dist .
539
Village
Survey
Tehsil
be acquired
No./
496
Block
522
No.
forR.O.U. inHectares.
05-04-27
TOTAL
5
4
3
2
1
0-31-57
38
(22) Fatepur
0-19-89
818
Nadiad (21 ) Utarsanda
Kheda
0-13-73
49
0-01-98
819
0-04-42
48
0-24-21
813
53
0-10-78
0-06-35
812
C.T.
0-14-53
788
0-12-62
54
0-09-56
791
0-02-32
56
0-03-11
789
0-27-67
60
0-03-49
790
0-05-59
61
Road
0-16-17
784
0-09-49
62
0-15-14
769
0-03-02
207
0-03-71
783
0-13-81
205
0-11-57
697
0-04-25
239
0-25-67
698
C.T.
Nala
0-08-05
301
0-12-78
605
0-03-56
302
0-08-37
603
2803 GI/2003-15 6742
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11, 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II SEC. 3( ii)] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Kheda Nadiad
303
(22) Fatepur
0-01-90
2042
Kheda Nadiad (24) Nadiad
0-03-85 304
2039
0-16-10 СТ.
0-03-16
Canal
0-00-81 TOTAL 02-38-64
2036
0-03-37 486
(23) Salunvanta
2035
0-25-22
0-07-16
Road
Canal
0-02-61
1986
0-22-57 490
0-28-97
1985
0-26-12 493
0-18-18
1977
0-19-87 497
0-18-07
1968
0-14-01 496
0-22-99
1966
0-11-57 Drain
0-01-11
1964
0-16-10 507/1
0-19-30
1963
0-02-82 С.Т.
1963/P
0-03-12 607
0-31-87
507/3
0-02-56
1940
0-02-09 606
0-03-04
1941
0-12-59 605
0-14-03
1945
0-09-54 604
0-03-06
1944
0-11-54 600
0-23-24
1943
0-10-05 559
0-14-70
1832
0-05-79 570
0-26-09
1834
0-06-37 569
0-03-40
1833
0-04-72 TOTAL 02-59-27
1829
0-19-38 (24)Nadiad
1551
0-10-94
1828
0-16-52 CT.
0-01-00,
1825
0-11-07 1550
0-25-97
1824
0-18-87 1549
0-02-76
1673
0-19-09 1545
0-26-36
С.Т.
1542
0-17-68
Canal
1487
0-24-16
1689
0-06-21 1488
0-09-02
Road
1486
0-08-20
1689
0-11-77 1480
0-14-57
1684
0-10-97 1481
0-04-92
1686
0-20-88 1479
0-13-45
2053
0-15-93 1478
0-31-16
Road
0-05-09 1477
0-02-72
2054
0-24-21 1473
0-25-10
2078
0-00-75 1472
0-09-25
2069
0-04-41
2070
0-09-41 2047
2071
0-06-96 2046
0-12-06
2073
0-00-96 2045
0-16-14
2063
0-04-01 2041
0-12-70
2064
0-11-49 6743 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
0-05-08
185
(26) Nadiad
Kheda Nadiad
0-16-97
2067
Kheda Nadiad (24) Nadiad
0-04-07
189
2040
0-04-52
201
1978
0-05-06
186
1687
0-02-40
С.Т.
07-40-37
TOTAL
0-15-38
200
0-05-28
371
(25) Marida Cart-Track
212
0-20-63
134/4
199
0-11-27
135
CT.
02-15-20
TOTAL
0-33-50
TOTAL
0-17-72
River
(27) Alajada
0-06-50
212
0-10-61
River
(26)Bilodra
0-35-77
211
0-15-61
428
0-27-97
218
0-22-83
429
0-08-33
217
0-18-99
411
0-13-90
223
0-01-62
422
0-13-39
224
0-12-56
418
0-04-10
225
0-03-84
415
0-06-40
Road
0-06-11
417
0-19-35
237
С.Т.
0-22-37
236
0-12-14
305
0-06-95
235
0-02-15
306
0-00-73
234
0-03-73
307
0-13-00
0-01-01
233
Nala
0-14-83
0-02-64
232
336
0-08-40
0-03-65
308
251
0-07-46
0-11-87 308/P
250
0-09-06
0-02-47
334
249
0-07-54
332
0-07-54
0-09-56
362
0-11-73
115
0-07-67
363
0-00-11
114
0-05-32
364
0-04-58
116
0-02-30
361
0-25-06
117
0-03-36
365
0-05-18
118
С.Т.
0-29-79
124
0-09-93
367
0-07-14
120
0-09-40
Road
0-03-92
122
0-07-24
211
0-16-34
123
0-01-94
146
119
0-06-80
Rly.
0-11-50
03-55-14
210
TOTAL
0-11-54
208
Canal
(28)Arera
0-06-38
207
0-58-11
199
0-06-70
182
C.T.
183
0-08-68
216
0-06-06
0-06-85
184 6744
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11, 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Kheda Nadiad
Road
(28) Arera
0-06-40
708
Kheda Mahem- (29 ) Varsola
0-12-10
196
0-19-67
dabad
709
0-06-30 196/P
0-13-78
Nala
195
0-08-14
799
0-16-64
190
0-25-23
798
0-09-65
184
0-17-45
715
0-09-02
183
0-01-40
715 /P
0-03-03
182
0-11-44
796
0-17-92 Road
0-08-40
795
0-12-39 166
0-35-16
794
0-11-79 165
0-00-95
896
0-19-49 138
0-25-51
895
0-09-02 137
0-10-68
851
0-18-37 141
0-06-30
894
0-00-72 Road
0-08-40
889
0-40-54 110
0-15-34
859
0-26-99 109
0-09-51
869
0-01-50 108
0-18-07
868
0-12-84 101
0-23-94
338
0-03-11 102
0-15-81
Nala
103
0-16-16
339
0-15-51 85
0-02-37
340
0-19-38 84
0-25-12
Road
0-06-40 65
0-15-50
358
0-28-17 64
0-31-21
358/P
0-34-75 61
0-14-06
359
47
0-08-99
0-09-01
0-01-80 46
0-04-25
405
0-11-27 34
0-18-38
406
0-02-72 50
0-04-07
404
0-10-74 33
0-02-30
411
0-22-53 31
0-23-31
403
0-29-95 30
0-24-23
397
0-20-09 28
0-18-59
399
0-04-03 27
0-10-05
398
0-01-15 TOTAL
394
05-75-33
0-11-96
Road
0-08-40 Kheda Mahem- (29) Varsola dabad
452
672
0-15-73
0-25-26
673
468
0-11-07
0-13-09
Canal
470
0-12-76 690
470/P
0-13-70
10-09-92 705
463
0-03-56
0-06-75 702
0-02-42
0-11-80
460
704
0-40-57
459
0-04-60 706
0-22-09
459/P
0-00-26 707
0-19-50
458
0-11-40 6745 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
1
2
0-06-84
Road
0-34-76 Kheda Nadiad ( 32) Areri
609
Kheda Mahem- (29 ) Varsola
0-16-25
343
0-21-69
610
dabad
0-62-14
346
0-23-41
620
0-03-82
Canal
0-01-60
612
0-28-04
234
850
0-20-04
232
0-01-12
893
0-53-30
279
08-38-54
TOTAL
0-02-83
220
0-06-40
0-10-18
Canal
1127
Kheda Nadiad (30) Devkivansol
0-04-53
1126
0-04-78
212
0-01-36
0-07-47
1122
208
0-12-06
0-17-47
1124
215
0-01-77
0-17-63
1123
216
0-00-88
0-22-94
1126
407
0-20-98
0-19-25
1111
189
0-01-80
0-01-57
186
1112
0-08-68
0-17-72
1109
173
0-09-80
0-01-28
1103
174
0-04-72
0-04-58
176
1106
0-14-79
0-07-35 1106 /P
177
0-09-15
176
Talav
0-01-98
0-07-10
1104
408
0-00-35
1113
04-05-91
TOTAL
01-45-60
TOTAL
0-04-29
777
Kheda Mahem- (33 ) Khatraj
0-16-49
1934
dabad
Kheda Mamem- ( 31 ) Vanthavli
0-18-10
0-08-65
1960
773 dabad
0-03-28
0-08-39
772
1931
0-04-29
0-06-40
768
Road
0-21-30
0-21-52
770
1915
0-01-33
0-15-29
769
1916
0-10-68
Nala
1909
0-10-16
0-07-50
908
1910
0-04-04
0-08-40
910
Road
0-10-16
0-10-02
911
1905
0-05-51
River
1906
0-07-38
0-14-70
46
1899
0-12-36
0-03-34
67
1898
0-10-12
0-02-69
72
1897
0-09-08
65
1935
0-05-31
61
01-39-82
TOTAL
0-06-25
60
0-19-18
25
0-06-52
62/A Kheda Nadiad ( 32) Areri
0-03-99
20
0-06-18
62/B
0-16-02
0-14-64
8
56
0-13-00
С.Т.
7
0-10-99
114
0-12-56
342 6746
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Kheda Mahem-
0-03-54
(33 ) Khatraj (Contd. ) 115
0-02-25
Kheda Mahem- (34) Sojali (contd. ) 32
dabad
117
0-10-38
dabad
185
0-03-72 120
0-04-36
187
0-02-48 119
0-00-26
188
0-21-08 125
0-15-63
189
0-02-61 С.Т.
195
0-11-84 126
0-18-90
194
0-06-37 128
0-13-83
190
0-00-43 139
0-26-84
193
0-08-75 141
0-01-92
TOTAL
Road
02-96-09
0-06-40
799
0-21-30
288
Kheda Mahem- (35) Ghodali
0-08-50 798
dabad
0-04-97
218
0-13-23 Road
0-06-40
239
0-23-24 818
0-25-48
234/B
0-16-45 819
0-19-71
263
0-14-82 820
0-06-43
226
0-08-14 781
0-00-53
231
0-25-83 780
0-14-60
227
0-08-68 779
0-02-07
289
0-00-94 778
0-13-15
Road
0-02-40 777
0-10-50
204
0-10-75
197
0-12-21 TOTAL 04-63-32
198
0-28-03 112
Kheda Mahem- ( 34 ) Sojali
0-04-74
200
0-25-92 dabad
112/P
0-05-96
139
0-16-57 113
0-10-40
Road
0-06-40 113/P
0-07-90
103
0-13-86 C.T.
106
0-03-18 114
0-00-66
104
0-01-84 Road
0-06-40
105
0-23-22 140
0-14-36
C.T.
141
0-06-77
99
0-15-39 51 /A
0-18-84
78
0-26-16 52
0-11-18
98
0-00-99 53
0-11-28
79
0-18-22 43
0-03-27
64
0-18-49 45
0-02-53
85
0-08-08 46
0-04-33
65
0-00-14 47
0-07-55
С.Т.
48
0-05-07
225
241
0-16-29
TOTAL 03-56-06 Canal
34/A
0-14-66
1012
0-11-47
Kheda Mahem- (36 ) Modaj
34/B
dabad
0-19-80
1010
0-04-27 27
0-01-86
1011
0-05-88 33
0-28-08
1015
0-01-21 6747 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/ आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
0-01-70
442
0-25-25
1016
Kheda Mahem- (38) Rohisa (contd. )
Kheda Mahem- (36 ) Modaj
0-35-61
443
0-03-92
1029
dabad
dabad
0-02-93
0-08-40
449
Road
0-17-98
1026
0-29-76
444
0-22-93
1043
0-20-81
441
1061
0-09-23
349
0-01-31
1043
0-11-20
437
0-09-56
1059
0-40-77
436
0-00-69
1062
0-18-34
0-11-32
1063
395
0-08-24
1064
0-28-13
393
0-06-85
1043
03-61-00
TOTAL
991
0-22-29
River
01-44-60
TOTAL
Kheda Mahem- ( 39 ) Raska
0-60-04
673
dabad
0-23-02
157
Kheda Mahem- (37 ) Amsarwan
0-08-36
674
0-10-37
172
dabad
0-05-27
0-10-92
С.Т.
173
0-02-12
0-09-96 582/A
435
0-08-60
174/A
0-29-91
Canal
0-01-48
527
0-17-17
434
0-08-44
580
0-12-45
432
0-01-13
601
0-36-44
С.Т.
0-05-76
500
0-01-20
431
0-00-26
509
0-08-26
0-07-34
528
433
0-02-75
586
0-37-71
429
0-12-02
528
0-01-50
425
0-03-80
182
0-37-92
427
0-17-09
181
0-17-85
375
0-11-34
226
0-37-31
422
0-01-97
553
0-03-59
0-00-27
411
224
0-07-95
0-19-32
225
409
0-04-96
0-15-56
502
410
0-12-54
221
0-16-70
406
0-08-84
Road
0-21-54
414
0-11-27
232
0-09-09
415
0-17-75
234
0-16-86
396
0-41-03
235
0-07-67
395
02-28-33
TOTAL
0-31-50
682
0-09-03
11
Kheda Mahem- ( 38 ) Rohisa
04-84-65
TOTAL
0-53-85
453
dabad
0-38-47
452
[F. No. L- 14014/41/2003 -G.P.J
0-48-85
441
SWAMI SINGH , Director
0-12-22
456 6748
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 22 सितम्बर, 2003
1
2
3
4
5
अहमदाबाद दसकोइ 40: हरीपुर 463
0-12-13
जारी 464
0-05-20
599
0-10-30
586
0-08-62
582
आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में सिसवा- रामोल पाइपलाइन परियोजना से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्था के साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए; का०आ० 2925.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह
0-06-10
578
0-02-67
584
0-05-05
585
0-12-53
592
0-00-97
593
0-04-99 औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिस में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
592
0-04-13
591
0-24-55
893/अ
0-07-06
561
0-07-34
895
0-00-65
527
0-06-71 अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
904/ब
0-01-30
903
0-04-17
902/ब
0-07-49
900
0-01-21
901
0-06-05
911
0-11-92
912
0-02-30
928
0-11-19
927
0-13-77 कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड दर्पण बिल्डिंग , आर ०सी ० दत्त रोड, अल्कापुरी, वडोदरा-390 005 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
920
0-14-68
921
0-20-80 अनुसूची
922
0-02-39
रस्तो
0-06-68 जिला तहसील ग्राम
सर्वे उ.का.अ. के
1084
0-09-64 नंबर लिए अर्जित
1083
0-02-61
की जाने वाली
1082
0-18-95
1081
भूमि (हैक्टेयर)
0-14-98
1080
1
0-12-75 2
3
4
5
1079
0-18-22
1078
अहमदाबाद दसकोइ
0-22-30
0-13-85
40: हरीपुरा 419
1077
0-02-52 446
0-10-28
1072
0-00-41 447
1076
0-06-55
0-23-27 444
1104
0-02-95
0-00-23 443
1105
0-17-00
0-15-25
919
कारट्रेक 0-03-72
954
452
0-10-50
0-08-03
453
0-25-02 .
04-98-59
कुल
457
0-13-17
41: बडोदरा 228
611
0-11-71
0-06-78
227
460
0-13-63
0-08-60
225
461
0-01-24
0-09-68
230
465
0-03-67
0-00-39
231
462
0-14-08
0-02-81
232
0-31-41 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
6749 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
1
2
3
4
5 1
2
3
4
5 237
41: बडोवस
0-01-56
42: बंच 359
0-25-47
अहमदाबाद दसकोइ
जारी 236
0-20-99
202
जारी
0-17-36
235
243
241
04-99-35
कुल
01-15-89
कुल
43: हाथीजण 634
0-42-44 42: बंच
0-23-00
632
0-23-55 1919
633
0-20-63
0-41-12 2090
0-14-65
601
599
0-01-73
0-00-35 कास्ट्रेक
637
0-01-91 1923
0-05-42
0-32-37
638
1922
0-08-23
25
0-02-03
0-04-57
कारट्रेक
0-14-46
26.
107
0-09-83
27
108
0-13-98
0-09-33 110
0-17-95
0-07-29
रस्तो
111
0-17-90
28
0-04-66 112
0-03-24
77
0-35-00 100
0-13-72
76
99
0-00-38
80
0-16-47 98
0-12-25
72
0-01-16 95
0-15-76
0-09-77
82
165
0-25-09
176
72
0-02-14
0-00-15
0-13-42
83
175
0-17-59
93
0-10-02
0-20-50
171
0-01-25
92
177
0-08-81
95
0-02-88 178
0-12-92.
0-03-63
94
0-15-61
201
0-08-09
95/पैकी
0-02-14
232
0-04-85
133
231
0-21-68
96
0-02-50 238
0-01-27
0-06-57
कारट्रेक
237
0-05-03
0-32-73
130
236
0-11-34
0-11-88
170
242
0-01-10
0-15-63
171
244
0-10-61
0-15-16
172
0-03-09
कारट्रेक
0-22-42
173
260
0-11-78
04-11-91
कुल
258
0-01-26
0-18-82
44: गरतनगर 20
259
0-30-33
0-07-35
रास्ता
265
0-30-88
0-01-23
192
0-03-95
279
0-12-34
190
269
0-04-10
0-04-86
रास्ता
278
0-13-90
188
0-32-37 277
0-25-90
0-86-00
कुल
0-04-77
275
0-03-88
[फाईल सं ० एल-14014/41/03- जी.पी. ] रस्तो
358
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
0-15-43
2803 GI/2003-16 6750
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
1 New Delhi , the 22nd September, 2003
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2
3 4
5
0-08-62
Ahmedabad Daskoi
S.O. 2925. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from Sisva- Rarnol pipeline project in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which isdescribed in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .
Anyperson interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, Darpan Building, R.C. Dutt Road , Alkapuri , Vadodara -390 005(Gujarat)
SCHEDULE
Distt.
Tehsil
Survey Land to be
Village
acquired for
R.O.U. in
Block
No./ No.
Hectares 2
1
5
3 4
0-13-85 Ahmedabad Daskol (40) Hirapur 419
446
0-10-28
447
0-06-55
0-02-95
444
443
0-17-00
C. T.
0-03-72
452
0-08-03
453
0-25-02
457
0-13-17
611
0-06-78
460
0-08-60
461
0-09-68
465
0-00-39
462
0-02-81
463
0-12-13
464
0-05-20
599
0-10-30 (40) Hirapur 586
582
0-06-10
0-02-67
578
0-05-05
584
585
0-12-53
592
0-00-97
0-04-99
593
0-04-13
592
0-24-55
591
0-07-06
893/B
0-07-34
561
0-00-65
895
0-06-71
527
0-01-30
904/A
0-04-17
903
0-07-49
902/B
0-01-21
900
0-06-05
901
0-11-92
911
912
0-02-30
0-11-19
928
927
0-13-77
0-14-68
920
0-20-80
921
0-02-39
922
0-06-68
Road
0-09-64
1084
0-02-61
1083
0-18-95
1082
1081
0-14-98
0-12-75
1080
0-18-22
1079
0-22-30
1078
0-02-52
1077
0-00-41
1072
0-23-27
1076
0-00-23
1104
0-15-25
1105
919
0-10-50
954
04-98-59
Total
0-11-71 (41)Badodara228
0-13-63
227
0-01-24
225
0-03-67
230
0-14-08
231
0-31-41
232
0-01-56
237
236
0-20-99 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
6751 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Ahmedabad Daskoi
0-17-36
235
(41) Badodara
202
(42) Vanch
Ahmedabad Daskoi
241
243
Total
01-15-89
Total
04-99-35
0-23-00
(42) Vanch Reiver
0-42-44
(43) Hathijan 634
.632
0-23-55 1919
0-20-63
2090
633
0-41-12 C. T.
601
0-01-73
0-14-65 1923
599
0-05-42
0-00-35 1922
637
0-08-23
0-01-91
638
C. T.
0-04-57
0-32-37 107
0-09-83
25
0-02-03 108
0-13-98
26
0-14-46 110
0-17-95
27
0-09-33 111
0-17-90
Road
0-07-29 112
0-03-24
28
0-04-66 100
0-13-72
99
0-35-00
0-00-38
98
0-12-25
76
95
0-15-76
80
0-16-47 165
0-25-09
72
0-01-16 176
0-00-15
82
0-09-77
0-17-59
175
72
0-02-14 171
0-20-50
83
0-13-42 177
0-08-81
93
0-10-02 178
0-12-92
92
0-01-25 201
0-15-61
0-02-88
95
94
232
0-03-63
0-02-14
0-08-09
95/p
231
0-21-68
133
0-04-85 2.38
0-01-27
96
0-02-50 237
0-05-03
0-06-57
C. T.
236
0-11-34
0-32-73
130
242
0-01-10
170
0-11-88 244
0-10-61
171
0-15-63 С.Т.
0-03-09
172
0-15-16 260
0-11-78
0-22-42
173
258
0-01-26
Total
04-11-91 259
0-30-33
0-18-82
(44)Garatnagar 20
265
0-30-88
Road
0-07-35 279
0-03-95
0-01-23
192
269
0-04-10
190
0-12-34 278
0-13-90
Road
0-04-86
0-25-90
277
188
0-32-37 275
0-04-77
0-86-00
Total Road
0-03-88
[File No. L -14014/41/03 -G.P. ] 358
0-15-43
SWAMI SINGH , Director 359
0-25-47 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
6752
5
4
3
1 2
नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2003
0-13-59
वलसाड कोचवाडा 208
बलसाड
0-32-91
209
0-03-71
210
0-06-26
रोड़
0-12-25
201
0-08-08
42
0-09-18
केनल
0-17-82
198
199
0-14-20
0-36-83
138
का.आ. 2926.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का०आ ० 1963 तारीख , 03 जून 2002 , द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में दहेज- वेमार- विजयपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी;
0-13-80
144
0-01-04
143
0-10-70 और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 30 जून , 2002 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी,
139
रोड
0-05-05
0-42-03
136
और उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया है;
0-02-48
132
0-02-98
131
और समक्ष प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
02-56-85
कुल:
0-09-50
कराया ड्रेइन
पारडी
वलसाड
0-07-60
91
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उस में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है;
90
0-31-60
0-03-56
96
0-45-02
89
97
0-03-09 अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्त्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है;
0-05-70
88
0-07-13
रोड़
0.01-27
98
0-30-89
87
86पैकी
86पैकी और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय, पाइपलाइन बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित किए गए निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
86पैकी अनुसूची
0-14-26
86पैकी
उ.का.अ. के
सर्वे
ग्राम
तहसील
जिला
0-61-77
81
नंबर लिए अर्जित
0-42-13
कीजाने वाली
78
भूमि ( हैक्टेयर में )
0-18-06
77
5
4
3
0-18-22 2
79
1
गवर्नमेन्ट लेन्ड 0-09-50 कोचवाडा 203
वलसाड
वलसाड
0-01-19 0-05-94
204
62 6753 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
4
1
2
3
5 1
2
3
4
5
0-22-50 वलसाड पारडी
वलसाड
कोपरली-जारी 507/3
0-42-25
पारद्दी
कराया-जारी 60
0-07-25
185
56
0-11-40
184
0-17-50
59
0-38-02
182
कार्ट ट्रेक 0-11-88
183
0-08-45
193
0-01-98
44
179/1,2 0-10-80
0-65-74
45
0-09-75
198
0-54-65
40
0-15-75
197
0-33-26
39
0-16-50
199
286
0-01-30
0-23-76
रीवर
202/1-2
05-93-84
कुल:
202/2-1
0-28-55
202/2-3
0-02-38
38
कोपरली
वलसाड पारी
0-16-15
204/1-2
0-52-57
39
0-26-75
285/1-2
0-02-57
293
0-00-25
कार्ट ट्रेक
284/पी
0-10-30
42
0-39-20
282/1-2
0-26-50
19
0-06-30
281
0-09-50
17
280
18
0-11-88
0-42-45
280/2
0-21-88
14
0-05-25
236/पी
0-21-00
15
0-23-25
237
0-22-50
9.
0-17-25
238/1,2
239
0-01-25
8
0-19-50
240/पी
8/2/ 1 -ए
0-16-05
277/पी
7
0-12-00
0-16-05
277/पी
0-07-50
540/1,2,3,4
0-09-45
276
0-29-25
541/2,3,4,5
0-35-75
275/पी
543/2,3,4,
271
0-02-38
543/1
0-19-00
271/पी
509
0-16-12
0-07-50
270
510/1/पी
0-42-00
254/पी
0-05-63
510/2,3,4,5
0-42-00
254
507/1
0-19-70
257
507/2-1
0-42-77
256
507/2/2/पी
0-02-38
खांडी
507/2/3/पी
08-92-67
कुल :
507/2-3,4
0-16-63
194
सूरत चोर्यासी तंलगपुर
507/2/5/2
0-16-63
196
197
507/2/3/पी 6754
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
4
5
New Delhi , the 6th October, 2003 चोर्यासी
198
0-11-88
सूरत
तलंगपुर
रस्तो
0-07-13
जारी
204
0-23-76
205
0-03-96
217
0-04-75
218
0-29-70
219
0-17-82
खाडी
0-08-32
220
0-17-82
221
0-20-20
S.O. 2926. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of. Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1963 dated the 3rd June, 2002, issued under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transport of natural gas through Dahej - Vemar -Vijaipur pipeline project in the State of Gujarat, by the GAIL (India) Limited;
222
0-08-32
224
0-52-27
232
0-21-38
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notifications were made available to the public on the 30th June, 2002;
228
0-03-56
231
0-09-50
233
0-20-20
And whereas the objections received from the public for laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the competent authority;
234
0-09-50
235
0-04-16
236
And whereas the competent authority has , under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted its report to the Central Government ;
237
0-05-25
238
239
0-01-50
And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein .
240
242
0-12-00
252
0-04-50
253
254
0-13-50
0-00-59
255
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
256
0-04-16
257
0-01-78
303
0-02-38
0-06-93
302
0-04-75
300
301
0-04-75
298
0-23-76
310
0-16-63
And further, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest, on the date of the publication of the declaration, in the GAIL (India ) Limited, proposing to lay the pipeline and thereupon the right of such user in the land shall, subject to the terms and conditions so imposed, vest in the GAIL (India) , free from all encumbrances .
297
0-16-63
SCHEDULE
327
0-00-79
0-07-92
325
Tehsil
Distt.
Village
324
0-20-20
0-08-32
320
Block
Land to be acquired for R.O.U. in
Hectares
No./ Survey No.
0-01-54
319
0-32-08
317
4
2
3
5
1
04-34-71
कुल:
Valsad
0-01-19
Valsad
8-Koch- 203
0-05-94
wada
204
[फाईल सं. एल-14014/5/03-जी.पी. ]
208
0-13-59
स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
6755 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Valsad
Pardi
Valsad
Valsad 8-Koch- 209
0-32-91
Cart Track
7-Karaya
0-11-88 wada
210
44
0-03-71
0-01-98
45
Road
0-06-26
0-65-74
40
201
0-54-65
0-12-25
39
42
0-33-26
0-08-08
River
0-23-76 Canal
0-09-18
198
0-17-82
Total : 05-93-84 199
0-14-20
Pardi
Valsad
6-Koparali 38
0-02-38 138
0-36-83
39
0-52-57 144
0-13-80
Cart Track 0-02-57 143
0-01-04
42
139
0-10-70
19
0-26-50
17
0-09-50 Road
0-05-50
18
0-11-88 136
0-42-03
14
0-21-88 132
0-02-48
15
0-21-00 131
0-02-98
9
0-22-50 Total : 02-56-85
8
8/2/ 1 -A 0-06-00 Valsad Pardi
0-09-50
Drain
7 -Karaya
7
0-12-00 91
0-07-60
540/1,2,3,4 0-07-50 90
0-31-60
541/2,3,4,5 0-29-25 96
0-03-56
543/2,3,4, 89
0-45-62
543/1
0-02-38 97
0-03-09
509
0-16-12 88
0-05-70
510/1 /P
Road
0-07-13
510/2,3,4,5 0-05-63 98
0-01-27
507/1
87
0-30-89
507/2-1
86
507/2/2/P 86/p
507/2,3/P 86/p
507/2-3,4 86/p
507/2/5/2
0-14-26
86/p
507/2/3/P 81
0-61-77
507/3
0-22-50 78
0-42-13
185
77
0-18-06
184
0-17-50 79
0-18-22
182
0-09-50
Govt . Land
183
62
193
60
0-42-25
179/1,2
56
0-11-40
198
59
0-38-02
197 6756
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
2
4
3
5 1
1
Surat
Pardi
Valsad
0-16-50
6-Koparali 199
286
0-01-30
202/1-2
202/2-1
202/2-3
0-28-55
0-16-15
204/1-2
285/1-2 0-26-75
293
0-00-25
284/P
0-10-30
282/ 1-2
0-39-20
0-06-30
281
280
0-42-45
280/2
0-05-25
236/P
237
0-23-25
0-17-25
238/ 1,2
0-01-25
239
240/P
0-19-50
0-16-05
277/P
0-16-05
277 /P
276
0-09-45
0-35-75
275/P
271
0-19-00
271 /P
270
0-07-50
254/P
0-42-00
254
0-42-00
257
0-19-70
256
0-42-77
0-02-38
Khadi
08-92-67
Total:
0-16-63 Surat
1 - Talang- 194
Choryasi
196
0-16-63
pur
197
0-11-88
198
0-07-13
Road
204
0-23-76
205
0-03-96
0-04-75
217
0-29-70
218
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2
3
4
5
0-17-82 Choryasi 1 -Talang- 219
0-08-32
Khadi
pur
220
0-17-82
0-20-20
221
222
0-08-32
224
0-52-27
0-21-38
232
0-03-56
228
0-09-50
231
0-20-20
233
0-09-50
234
0-04-16
235
236
237
0-05-25
238
239
0-01-50
240
242
0-12-00
252
0-04-50
253
254
0-13-50
0-00-59
255
0-04-16
256
0-01-78
257
0-02-38
303
0-06-93
302
0-04-75
300
0-04-75
301
0-23-76
298
0-16-63
310
0-16-63
297
0-00-79
327
325
0-07-92
0-20-20
324
0-08-32
320
319
0-01-54
0-32-08
317
04-34-71
Total:
[File No. L- 14014/5/03 -G.P. ]
SWAMI SINGH , Director 6757 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/ आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
4
3
2
1
नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2003
0.018
77/1
मंदपल्लि
कोत्तपेटा
पूरब
0.034
75/9
गोदावरी
0.036
75/8
का.आ. 2927.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में मुक्तेश्वरम से कोनासीमा विद्युत संयत्र तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
0.038
75/7
0.020
75/7
0.140
75/2
0.097
74/9
0.09%
73
0.008
74/3
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त पाइपलाइनइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
0.024
74/2
0.011
74/2
0.143
71/3
0.082
71/3
0.013
71/3
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962.( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
0.024
71/2
0.013
71/1
0.090
69/6
0.107
69/5
0.056
69/2
0.011
69/1
0.044
68/6
0.034
63/5 कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, के.जी. बेसिन परियोजना , जेट्टी एवेन्यू, दानावेपेटा, राजामुन्द्री-533 103 , आन्ध्र प्रदेश को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
0,041
63/5 अनुसूची
0.058
63/3 जिला- पूर्व गोदावरी
0.058 मंडल-कोत्तपेटा
63/2
0.065
63/1
सर्वे सं. भू.प्र.अ.
ग्राम
जिला मंडल
0.008
62/3
अधिकार
0.042
62/1
0.081
62/1
के लिए अर्जित
क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर
0.035
62/1
5
4
0.035 3
62/1 2
1
0.036
60/6
0.010
78/8
मंदपल्लि
कोत्तपेटा
पूरब
0.166
60/4,5
0.010
78/8
गोदावरी
0.184
60/3,2,1
0.067
78/7
0.003
59/6
0.031
78/2
0.013
59/6
0.027
78/1
0.038
59/4
0.012
0.033
59/5
76/3
0,033
0.030
76/3
59/4
0.032
76/3
0.002
59/1
0.033
76/3
0.032
53/8
0,032
76/3
0.036
53/7
0.032
76/3
0.015
53/6
0.027
77/10
0.017
53/4
0.034
77/9
0.040
53/4
0.061
77/8
0.057
52/7
0.043
77/4
0.000
53/2
0.023
77/2
2803 GI/2003-17 6758
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 पूरब कोत्तपेटा मंदपल्लि 52/10
0.027
पूरब गोदावरी
52/9
0.032 गोदावरी
52/5
0.065
52/5
0.040
51/5
0.043
52/4
0.023
52/3
0.049
52/2
0.049
52/2
0.053
51/14
0.009
51/13
0.063
51/12
0.058
51/11
0.018
51/10
0.022
51/9
0.056
51/7
0.050
50/3
0.054
50/2
0.003
50/1
0.051
49/9
0.004
49/7
0.059
49/6
0.072
49/5
0.017
49/4
0.034
49/4
0.022
49/3
0.031
49/2
0.043
49/1
0.058
48/2
0.099
48/1
0.000
47/6
0.059
47/4
0,113
47/3
0.122
47/3
0.000
47/1
28/5
0.117
28/4
0.009
28/4
0.001
28/3
0.032
28/3
0,031
28/2
0.036
27/6
0.070
27/5
0.032
27/5
0.040
29/7
0.046
29/7
0.058
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 3
2
4
5 कोत्तपेटा मंदपल्लि
29/5
0.023
29/5
0.023
29/4
0.029
29/3
0.027
29/2
0.029
29/1
0.016
30/10
0.103
30/9
0.079
30/8
0.063
30/7
0.018
30/6
0.010
30/6
0.010
30/5
0.011
30/4
0.008
30/4
0.011
30/3
0.013
30/2
0.018
30/1
0.058
32/1
0,030
3/5
0.057
3/4
0.025
3/3
0.032
3/2
0.023
3/1
0.035
3/1
0.024
3/1
0.031
4/6
0.034
4/3
0.031
4/2
0.056
4/1
0,077
7/2
0.040
7/2
0.064
7/1
0.056
9/15
0.043
9/13
0.023
9/12
0.036
9/11
0.000
9/10
0.036
9/9
0.032
9/8
0.034
9/7
0.022
9/6
0.006
15/2
0.134
15/3
0.023
19/1
0.013
19/4
0.021 6759
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2
4
5
1 3
2
1
0.072
16
मंदपल्लि
कोत्तपेटा
पूरब
0.005
18/4
गोदावरी
0.037
18/5
0.022
18/6
0.014
18/7
6.468
कुल
0.027
482/1A
कोत्तपेटा
0.027
482/ 1B
0,009
482/4
0.024
481/19
0.072
481/18
0.070
481/17
0.079
481/16
0.094
481/15
0.009
481/14
0.032
481/11
0/029
481/10
0.018
481/9
0.040
481/5
0.041
481/5
0.021
481/4
0.036
481/3
0.040
481/2
0.023
478/18
0.003
478/17
0.021
478/14
0.077
478/9
0.031
478/5
0.037
478/5
0.081
478/4
0.049
478/1
0.027
476/3
0.033
476/1
0.041
476/1
0.031
476/1
0.043
475
0.040
49
0.023
47/1A
0.079
44
0.005
5/3
0.040
5/1
0.010
6/3
0.040
6/3
0.040
6/3
0.120
6/2
0.081
6/2
5
4
3
0.026
6/1
कोत्तपेटा
0.045
3/5
0.054
3/5
0.689
3/4
2.455
कुल
0.025
26
कानपल्लि
0.039
25/12
0.040
25/12
0.058
25/11
0.047
28/2
0.130
28/1
0.032
29/3
0.035
29/3
0.117
29/2
0.145
29/1
0.120
29/1
0.092
39
0.015
31/3
0.065
41/2
0.060
41/1
0.058
41/1
0.160
42
0.141
42
0.023
43
0.110
44
0.122
44
0.110
44
0.122
45
45
0.146
0.149
45
0.080
47
0.082
47
0.040
48
0.031
48
0,040
48
0.119
49
0.101
50
0.071
51
0.092
51
0,067
52
0.046
52
0.210
55
0.213
55
0.118
54
0.230
56
0.081
238/3 6760
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 पूरब कोत्तपेटा वानपल्लि 238/2
0.035 गोदावरी
238/2
0.037
236
0.029
233/4
0.072
235/1
0,092
234/4
0.018
234/3
0.088
234/2
0.016
232/5
0.101
231/2
0.121
231/1
0.151
229/6
0.031
229/5
0.034
229/4
0.032
229/2
0.029
229/1
0.108
228/5
0.049
228/4
0.019
228/4
0.024
228/3
0.040
228/3
0.047
228/1
0.040
228/1
0.032
227/3
0.039
227/3
0.042
227/2
0.043
227/2
0,042
226/11
0.063
226/8
0,020
226/7
0,241
226/7
0.021
226/6
0.054
226/5
0.010
226/1
0,070
224
0.025
221/3
0.045
221/3
0.041
221/2
0.068
221/1
0.139
220
0.083
219
0.125
219
0.102
218/14
0.022
218/14
0.024
218/12
0.040
218/11
0.079
PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 2
3
4
5
पूरब कोत्तपेटा
218/9
वानपल्लि
0.041
गोदावरी
218/8
0.043
218/7
0.036
218/4
0.038
218/3
0.037
218/2
0,040
218/1
0.070
201
0.210
201
0,213
200/2
0.284
200/1
0.060
200/1
0.051
199/2
0.100
199/2
0.100
199/1
0.193
198/5
0.022
198/3
0.089
198/2
0.040
198/2
0.049
197/7
0.090
197/6
0.032
197/5
0.025
197/4
0.022
197/3
0.014
197/3
0.020
197/2
0.117
197/1
0.072
196/4
0.043
196/4
0.042
196/3
0.065
196/2.,
0.052
196/1
0.043
196/1
0.043
196/1
0.041
195/2
0.201
195/2
0.190
195/2
0.136
195/1
0.153
194/1
0.099
9.677
कुल
कपलि- नारायणलंका 589/7
0.027
589/3
0.140 श्वरपुरम
589/3
0.148
590/8
0.095
590/6
0.059
590/3
0,200 6761 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11, 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
5.
3
2
4
5
1
3
1
2
0.022
529/6
0,078
590/2
पूरब एनविल्लि मदुपल्लि
कपलिश- नारायणलंका
पूर्व
0.036
529/5
0.099 गोदावरी
590/1
वरपुरम
गोदावरी
0.040
529/5
0.291
586/1
0,090
529/4
0,240
586/2
0.135
529/3
0.035
573/10
0.081
529/2
0.045
573/10
0.090
528
0.043
573/6
0.018
526/4
0.079
573/3
0.000
526/4
0.027
573/4
0.090
526/3
0.099
572/3
0.034
526/3
0.036
572/4
0.126
526/2
0.140
572/1
0.102
526/6
0.081
571/5
0,090
492/3
0.040
571/5
0.047
492/2
0.243
571/4
0.112
492/1
0.018
571/3
0.009
492/5
0.013
571/3
0.009
492/6
569/1
0.100
0.015
491/16
0.062
541/16
0.030
491/17
0.040
541/16
0.040
491/14
0.108
541/14
0.047
491/12
0,068
541/13
0.081
491/9
0.025
541/10
0.012
491/6
0.012
541/9
0.012
491/5
0.014
541/8
0.006
491/4
0.014
540
5.217
0.099
545/11
कुल
0.036
545/10
0.085
178/3
0.076
545/9
0.092
178/3
0.144
545/7
0.059
178/3
0.091
545/2
0.050
178/2
0.018
545/1
0.059
178/1
0.012
539/9
0.229
177/1
0.090
539/8
0.104
1758/2
0.162
539/6
0.113
175/3
0.032
539/5
0.077
174
0,090
535/9
0.216
180/4
0.016
535/8
0.104
180/3
0.006
535/8
0,121
157/7
0.032
535/7
0.081
157/6
0.036
535/6
0.114
157/5
0,031
535/5
0.122
157/4
0.025
535/4
0.097
156/11
0.027
535/3
0.009
156/5
0.027
535/2
0.035
156/10
0.081
535/1 6762
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ ASVINA 19, 1925
1
3
2
4
5
1 पूरब
156/9
0.021
मदुपल्ली
एनविल्लि
पूरब
गोदावरी
156/7
0.030
156/8
0,039
154/9
0.009
154/8
0.060
154/7
0.193
154/1
0.086
153/2
0.038
153/1
0.122
152/6
0.070
152/5
0.041
152/4
0.043
152/3
0.030
13/2
0.025
151/1
0.085
14/5
0.081
14/4
0.486
14/4
0.047
14/1
0.076
15/3
0.062
15/3
0.078
15/3
0.040
15/3
0.043
16/7
0.088
16/6
0.082
16/5
0.040
16/4
0,031
18/1
0.092
18/1
0.100
18/1
0.088
18/3
0.112
18/3
0.000
20/2
0.094
20/1
0.192
4.485
कुल
वीरवल्लिपालेम 95
0,012
96/10
0,050
96/8
0.045
96/7
0.027
96/4
0.050
96/3
0.006
96/2
0.037
96/1
0.023
96/7
0.036
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5
91/11
एनविल्लि वीरवल्लिपालेम
0.107
गोदावरी
91/9
0.005
91/7
0.097
91/2
0.036
90/13
0.074
90/8
0.031
90/7
0.040
90/6
0.035
89/9
0.166
83/8
0.160
83/6
0.011
83/7
0.158
83/1
0.059
84/3
0.179
84/2
0.076
84/1
0.043
47
0.020
48
0.008
50/4
0.081
50/3
0.101
53/9
0.029
53/8
0.065
53/5
0.241
53/2
0.041
27/5
0.225
27/1
0.060
27/1
0.052
26/2
0.031
26/1
0,065
26/1
0.054
25
0,222
25
0,247
31/1
0.191
31/2
0.024
31/3
0.031
32/1
0.005
36/6
0.306
36/3
0.068
36/4
0.025
35
0.011
3.765
कुल
229/5
0.011 वेलुवलपल्लि
229/3
0.091
229/2
0.020
228/1
0.058 6763 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
0.101
97/1
0.005 पूरब
पूर्व एनविल्लि एनविल्लि
एनविल्लि वेलुवलपल्लि 228/5
गोदावरि
0.036
227/7
97/4
0.130
गोदावरि
227/6
0.076
0.039
102/3
102/2
0.119 227/5
0,033
102/1
0.126
0.085
219/4
0.019
103/3
220/5
0.101
0.068
103/4
220/3
0.463
107/1
0.209 220/3
0.040
0.202
107/3
220/1
0.097
0,066
107/1
0.058
222/6
115/5
0.061 222/5
0.043
115/4
0.062 222/4
0.046
0.023
115/1
221/2
0.073
0.038
117/9
210/7
0.163
0.021
117/6
0.013
211/18
0.039
117/4
0.129
211/14
0.076
117/3
211/12
0.081
0.259
116/3
0.058
211/9
0.015
116/1
211/5
0.005
0.219
119/2
211/6
0.005
0.027
129
0.080
128/4
211/8
0,030
0.027
121/3
1.912
कुल
0.257
127/3
0.108
74/4A
एनविल्लि
127/1
0.126
0.061
0.001 74/3
126/3
0.250
125
74/1
0.058
0.205
125
0.094
72/6
72/5
0.030
4.221
कुल
0.007
72/2
0.006
36/1
रावुलपालेम देवापल्लि
0.023
72/3
36/2
0.138 72/4
0.030
0.003
36/2
0.006
71/1
0.009
34/1
55/6
0.249
0.120
34/2
0.099
55/3
0.159
34/2
55/4
0.005
0.131
34/2
51/6
0.002
0.010
1-Aug.
0.006
0.018
8/2A
51/5
0.173
0.269
7/1,2,3,5 51/3
0.333
7/7,8,10,11 51/2
0.041
0.060
5/16
0.085
51/1
4/4
0.178
0.029
50/7
1.326
0.114
50/4
कुल
0.052
96
[फा. सं.-एल-14014/43 /2003-GP]
0.078
97/2
स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक 6764
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 6th October 2003
1
2
3
4
5
East
0.140
Kothapeta Mandapalli 75/2
Godavari
74/9
0.097
73
0.096
74/3
0.008 S.O. 2927 Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from Muktheswaram to Konaseema Power Plant in the State ofAndhra Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
74/2
0.024
74/2
0.011
71/3
0.143
71/3
0.082
71/3
0.013 And wheras it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to the notification;
71/2
0.024
71/1
0.013
69/6
0.090
69/5
0.107 Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
69/2
0.056
69/1
0.011
68/6
0.044
63/5
0.034
63/5
0.041
63/3
0.058
63/2
0.058
63/1
0.065 Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3' of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority , GAIL ( India) Limited; K.G. Basin Project, Jetty Avenue , Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry -533103 , Andhra Pradesh.
62/3
0.008 SCHEDULE
62/1
0.042 Dissrict Mandal
Land to be
Survey
Village
62/1
0.081 No./ Acquired
0.035
62/1
Sub -Divn . for R.O.U.
62/1
0.035 No.
(inHectares)
60/6
0.036 1
2
3
5
4
60/4,5
0.166 East
0.010
Kothapeta Mandapalli 78/8
60/3,2,1
0.184 Godavari
78/8
0.010
59/6
0.003 78/7
0.067
59/6
0.013 78/2
0.031
59/4
0.038 78/1
0.027
59/5
0.012 76/3
0.033
59/4
0.030 76/3
0.033
59/1
0.002 76/3
0.032
53/8
0.032 76/3
0.033
53/7
0.036 76/3
0,032
53/6
0.015 76/3
0.032
53/4
0.017 77/10
0.027
53/4
0.040 77/9
0.034
52/7
0.057 77/8
0.061
53/2
77/4
0.043
52/10
0.027 77/2
0.023
52/9
0.032
0.018
77/1
52/5
0.065 75/9
0.034
52/5
0.040 75/8
0.036
75/7
0.038
51/5
0.043 75/7
52/4
0.020
0.023 6765 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
5
4
1
3
2
3
4
5
1
2
0.063
30/8
East
0.049
52/3
Kothapeta Mandapali
East Kothapeta Mandapali
0.018
30/7
0.049 Godavari
Godavari
52/2
30/6
0.010
0.053
52/2
0.016
30/6
0.009
51/14
0.011
30/5
0.063
51/13
0.008
30/4
0.058
51/12
0.011
30/4
51/11
0.018
0.013
30/3
0,022
51/10
0,010
30/6
0.056
51/9
0,011
30/5
0.050
51/7
0.008
30/4
0.054
50/3
0,011
30/4
0.003
50/2
0.013
30/3
50/1
0.051
0.018
0,004
49/9
30/2
0.059
0.058 49/7
30/1
0.072
49/6
0.030
32/1
0.017
49/5
0.057
3/5
0.034
49/4
0.025
3/4
0.022
49/4
0.032
3/3
0.031
49/3
0.023
3/2
49/2
0,043
0.035
3/1
49/1
0.058
0.024
3/1
0,099
48/2
0.031
3/1
0.000
48/1
0.034
4/6
0.059
47/6
0.031
4/3
0.113
47/4
0,056
4/2
0.122
47/3
0.077
4/1
0.000
47/3
0.040
7/2
47/1
0.064
0.117
28/5
7/2
0.009
0,056 28/4
7/1
0.001
28/4
0.043
9/15
0.032
28/3
0.023
9/13
0.031
28/3
0.036
9/12
0.036
28/2
0.000
9/11
0,070
27/6
0.036
9/10
0.032
27/5
0.032
9/9
0.040
27/5
0.034
9/8
0.046
29/7
0.022
97
0.058
29/7
0.006
9/6
0.023
29/5
0.134
15/2
0.023
29/5
0.023
15/3
0.029
29/4
0.013
19/1
0.027
29/3
0.021
19/4
0.029
29/2
0.072
16
0.016
29/1
0.005
18/4
0.103
30/10
0.037
18/5
0.079
30/9
2803 GI/2003-18 6766
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 East
18/6
0.022
Kothapeta Mandapali
26
0.025
East Kothapeta Vanapalli
Godavari
18/7
0.014 Godavari
25/12
0.039
25/12
0.040 Total
6.468
25/11
0.058 482/1A
0.027
Kolhapeta
28/2
0.047 482/1B
0.027
28/1
0.130 482/4
0,009
29/3
0.032 481/19
0.024
29/3
0.035 481/18
0,072
29/2
0.117 481/17
0,070
29/1
0.145 481/16
0,079
29/1
0.120 481/15
0.094
39
0,092 481/14
0,009
31/3
0.015 481/11
0,032
41/2
0.065 481/10
0.029
41/1
0.060 481/9
0,018
41/1
0.058 481/5
0.040
42
0.160 481/5
0.041
42
0.141 481/4
0.021
43
0.023 481/3
0,036
44
0.110 481/2
0,040
44
0.122 478/18
0,023
44
0.110 478/17
0.003
45
0.122 478/14
0.021
45
0.146 478/9
0.077
45
0.149 478/5
0.031
47
0.080 478/5
0.037
47
0.082 478/4
0,081
48
478/1
0.040
0.049
476/3
48
0.027
0.031 476/1
48
0.033
0.040 476/1
0.041
49
0.119 476/1
0.031
50
0.101 475
0.043
51
0.071 49
0.040
51
0,092
0.023
47/ 1A
52
0.067 44
0.079
52
0,046 5/3
0.005
55
0.210 5/1
0.040
55
0.213 6/3
0.010
54
0.118 6/3
0.040
56
0.230 6/3
0.040
0.081
238/3
6/2
0.120
238/2
0.035 6/2
0.081
0.037
238/2
6/1
0.026
236
0.029 3/5
0.045
233/4
0.072 3/5
0.054
235/1
0,092 3/4
0.689
234/4
0.018 Total
2.455
0.088
234/3 6767 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
4
3
2
5
1
4
3
2
1
0.213
201
East
0.016
Vanapalli
Kothapeta
234/2
East Kothapeta Vanapalli
0.284
200/2
Godavari
0.101
232/5
Godavari
0,060
200/1
0.121
231/2
0.051
200/1
0.151
231/1
0.100
199/2
0.031
229/6
0.100
199/2
0.034
229/5
0.193
199/1
0.032
229/4
0.022
198/5
0.029
229/2
0.089
198/3
0.108
229/1
0.040
198/2
0.049
228/5
0.049
198/2
0.019
228/4
0.090
197/7
0.024
228/4
0.032
197/6
0.040
228/3
0.025
197/5
0.047
228/3
0.022
197/4
0.040
228/1
0.014
197/3
0.032
228/1
0.020
197/3
0.039
227/3
0.117
197/2
0.042
227/3
0.072
197/1
0.043
227/2
0.043
196/4
0.042
227/2
0.042,
196/4
0.063
226/11
0,065
196/3
0.020
226/8
0.052
196/2
0.241
226/7
0.043
196/1
0.021
226/7
0.043
196/1
0.054
226/6
0.041
196/1
0.010
226/5
0.201
195/2
0.070
226/1
0.190
195/2
0.025
224
0.136
195/2
0.045
221/3
0.153
195/1
0.041
221/3
0.099
194/1
0.068
221/2
9.677
Total
0.139
221/1
0.027
589/7
0.083
220
Narayan
East Kapiles-
0.140
589/3
Lanka
0.125 Godavari wara
219
0.148
589/3
Puram
0.102
219
0.095
590/8
0.022
218/14
0.059
590/6
0.024
218/14
0,200
590/3
0.040
218/12
0.078
590/2
0.079
218/11
0.099
590/1
0.041
0.291
218/9
586/1
0,240
0.043
586/2
218/8
0.035
0.036
573/10
218/7
0.045
573/10
0.038
218/4
0.043
573/6
0.037
218/3
0.079
573/3
0,040
218/2
0.027
573/4
0,070
218/1
0.099
572/3
0.210
201 6768
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 East
572/4
0.036
East
Kapiles- Narayan
526/6
0.102
Kapiles- Narayan
Lanka
Godavari wara
572/1
0.140 Godavari wara Lanka
492/3
0.090 Puram
571/5
0.081
Puram
492/2
0.047 571/5
0.040
492/1
0.112 571/4
0.243
492/5
0.009 571/3
0.018
492/6
0.009 571/3
0.013
491/16
0.015 569/1
0,100
491/17
0.030 541/16
0.062
491/14
0.040 541/16
0.040
491/12
0.047 541/14
0,108
491/9
0.081 541/13
0,068
491/6
0.012 541/10
0.025
491/5
0,012 541/9
0.012
491/4
0.006 541/8
0.014
Total
5.217 540
0,014
178/3
0.085
Ainavilli Madupalli
545/11
0,099
178/3
0.092 545/10
0.036
178/3
0.059 545/9
0.076
178/2
0.050 5457
0.144
178/1
0.059 545/2
0.091
177/1
0.229
0.018
545/1
175/2
0.104 539/9
0.012
175/3
0.113 539/8
0.090
174
0.077 539/6
0.162
180/4
0.216 539/5
0.032
180/3
0.104 535/9
0.090
157/7
0.121 535/8
0.016
157/6
0.081
0.006
535/8
157/5
0.114 535/7
0.032
157/4
0.122 535/6
0.036
0.097
156/11
535/5
0.031
156/5
0.009 535/4
0.025
156/10
0.035 535/3
0.027
156/9
0.021 535/2
0.027
156/7
0.030 535/1
0.081
156/8
0.039 529/6
0.022
154/9
0.009 529/5
0.036
154/8
0.060 529/5
0.040
154/7
0.193 529/4
0.090
154/1
0,086 529/3
0.135
0,038
153/2
529/2
0.081
153/1
0.122 528
-0.090
152/6
0.070 526/4
0.018
152/5
0.041 526/4
152/4
0.043 526/3
0.090
152/3
0,030 526/3
0.034
13/2
0.025
0.126
526/2
0.085
151/1 6769 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
4
5
2
3
1
4
5
2
3
1
0.101
50/3
0.081 East Ainavilli Veeravalli
14/5
East Ainavilli Madupalli
53/9
0.029
Palem
Godavari
0.486
14/4
Godavari
53/8
0.065
0.047
14/4
53/5
0,241
0.076
14/1
0.041
53/2
0.062
15/3
0.225
27/5
0.078
15/3
0.060
27/1
0.040
15/3
0.052
27/1
0.043
15/3
0.031
26/2
0.088
16/7
0,065
26/1
0.082
16/6
0.054
26/1
16/5
0.040
0.222
25
16/4
0.031
0,247
25
18/1
0.092
0.191
31/1
0.100
18/1
0.024
31/2
0.088
18/1
0.031
31/3
0.112
18/3
0.005
32/1
0.000
18/3
0.306
36/6
0.094
20/2
0.068
36/3
0.192
20/1
0.025
36/4
0.011
35
4.485
Total
0.012
3.765 95
Total
Ainavilli Veeravalli
East
0.050
96/10
Palem
Godavari
0.011
East
229/5
Ainavilli Veluvalapalli
0.045
96/8
0.091
229/3
Godavari
0.027
96/7
0.020
229/2
0.050
96/4
0.058
228/1
0.006
96/3
0.101
228/5
0.037
0.036 96/2
227/7
0.076
0.023
96/1
227/6
0.033
0.036
96/7
227/5
0.085
0.107
219/4 91/11
0.101
220/5
0.005
91/9
0463
220/3
0.097
91/7
0.040
220/3
0.036
91/2
0.097
220/1
0.074
90/13
0.058
222/6
0.031
90/8
0.043
222/5
0.040
90/7
0.046
222/4
0.035
90/6
0.073
221/2
0.166
89/9
0.163
210/7
0,160
83/8
0.013
211/18 83/6
0.011
0.129
211/14
0.158
83/7
0.081
211/12
0.059
83/1
0.058
211/9
0.179
84/3
0.005
211/5
0.076
84/2
0.005
211/6
0.043
84/1
0.030
211/8
0.020
47
0.008
48
1.912
Total
0.081
50/4 6770
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
5
4
1
2
3
4
5 East Ainavilli Ainavilli 74/4A
0.108 East
0.006
Ravulapalem Devarapalli 36/1
Godavari
74/3
0.061 Godavari
36/2
0.138 74/1
0.058
36/2
0.003 72/6
0.094
34/1
0.009 72/5
0.030
34/2
0.120
0.007
72/2
34/2
0,159 72/3
0.023
34/2
0.131 72/4
0,030
8/1
0.010 71/1
0.006
8/2A
0.006 55/6
0.249
7/1,2,3,5
0.173 55/3
0.099
0.333
7/7,8,10,11 55/4
0.005
5/16
0.060 51/6
0.002
4/4
0.178 51/5
0.018
51/3
0.269
Total
1,326 51/2
0.041
[F. No. L - 14014/43/2003 -GP] 51/1
0.085
SWAMI SINGH , Director 50/7
0.029
नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2003
50/4
0.114
96
0.052
97/2
0.078
97/1
0.005
97/4
0.130
102/3
0.039
102/2
0.119
102/1
0.126
103/3
0.019
103/4
0.068
107/1
0.209
107/3
0.202
107/1
0.066
का.आ. 2928.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है .) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 1681 , तारीख , 09 जून, 2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा राजस्थान राज्य में सिवर - रामचन्दपुरा स्परलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से द्रव पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
115/5
0.061
115/4
0.062
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचनाओं की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 30जून, 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
115/1
0.023
117/9
0,038
117/6
0.021
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है; 117/4
0.039
117/3
0.076
0.259
116/3
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और समाधान हो जाने पर इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है । 116/1
0.015
119/2
0.219
129
0.027
0,080
128/4
0.027
121/3
0.257
127/3
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
127/1
0.126
126/3
0.001
125
0.250
125
0.205
Total
4.221
और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा .... (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार , इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को , केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इंडिया) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 6771 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची
उपयोग का
खसरा
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act submitted its report to the Central Government;
ग्राम
तहसील
जिला
नं.
अधिकार के लिए अर्जित
भूमि हेक्टेयर में
And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report , and on being satisfied has decided to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to this notification;
5
4
3
2
1
0.1188
458/932
माचवा
जयपुर जयपुर
0.0792
458/1008
0.1980
योग
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
0.4989
1083
सिवार्ड
0.4989
योग
0.0950
1980
मुहाना
सांगानेर
0.0950
योग
And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on this date of the publication of this declaration , in the GAIL ( India ) Limited, free from all encumbrances.
0.0040
SCHEDULE
केलवाद 874
सोजत
पाली
0.1500
876
Tehsil
Disrict
Village
0.1320
Survey No.
878
0.0400
879
Land to be Acquired for R.O.U. inHectares.
0.0040
863
5
4
3
0.0800
2
881
1
0.1188
458/932
0.1300
Machawa
861
Jaipur
Jaipur
0.0792
458/1008
0.1540
855
0.1980
0.0800
TOTAL 856
0.4989
0.3840
853
1083
Sinwar
0.2200
850
0.4989
TOTAL
0.1440
847
0.0950
1980
Sanganer Muhana
0.1800
848
0.0950
TOTAL
1.7020
योग
0.0040
874
Kelwad
Pali Sojat
0.1500
876
नसीराबाद
अजमेर
0.0277
0.1320
878
राजगढ उर्फ चाट सरदारपुरा 1131
0.0400
879
0.0277
योग
0.0040
863
0.0800
881
[क्रमांक- एल -14014/01 / 03/जी.पी. ]
0.1300
स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक
861
0.1540
855 New Delhi , the 6th October 2003
0.0800
856
0.3840
853
0.2200
850
0.1440
847
0.1800
848
1.7020
TOTAL
Ajmer Nasira- bad
0.0277
1131
Rajgarh URF Chat Sardarpura
0.0277
TOTAL S.O. 2928.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas No. S.O. 1681 dated 9th June , 2003 ; issued undersub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) . The Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to those notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transport of liquid petroleum gas through Siwar-Ramchandpura spurline project in the State of Rajasthan by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;
[No. L- 14014/01/03/G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH, Director And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notifications were made available to the public on the day of 30th June , 2003 ;
6772
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
श्रम मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 12 सितम्बर, 2003
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] APPEARANCES :-
FortheEmployer
: No Appearance.
For the Workmen
का० आ० 2929.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विबाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/20 ऑफ 2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल.-12011/252/2002- आई आर (बी- II ) ]
सी, गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi , the 12th September , 2003 S.O. 2929. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 2/20 of2003 ofthe Central Govt Indus . Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-09-2003 .
[No. L- 12011 /252/2002 -IR(B- II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT :
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer :
Ref. No. CGIT- 2/20 of 2003
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF BANK OF INDIA
The General Manager (P), Mumbai South Zone Bank of India, BOI Building, 70-80, M.G. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400023 .
Vs.
TheirWorkmen
The General Secretary, Bank of India StaffUnion, BOI Building, Ground Floor, 70-80 , M.G. Road, Fort, Mumbai -400023.
: No Appearance .
Mumbai , dated 27th August, 2003.
AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 12011 /252/2002 /IR( B- II ) dated 31-3-2003 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, Mumbai , South Zone , Mumbai to remove Shri P.N. Kotian from service w.e.f. 9-2-2001 is justified? If not, what relief the workman Shri P.N. Kotian is entitled to?"
2. On receipt of the reference , notice (Exhibit -2) was sent to both the Management and the Union, however , though notice served (vide Exhibit- 3 /4) both did not appear and that today also none of the parties present, which indicate Union/ Workman are/ is not interested in prosecuting the reference , therefore , the following order is passed:
ORDER
Reference stands disposed of for non -prosecution .
S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 सितम्बर , 2003
का० आ० . 2930.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पटना के पंचाट [संदर्भ संख्या 4 ( सी) ऑफ 2003 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-09-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.-12011/205/2001- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी० गंगाधारण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th September, 2003
S.O. 2930. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. 4(C) / 2003 of the Industrial Tribunal , Patna ( Bihar ) as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-09-2003 .
[No. L- 12011 /205/2001 - IR(B - II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
6773
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
ANNEXURE
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA .
Reference Case No. 4(C) of2003.
Management of UCO Bank, Mouryalok Complex , A- Block, 4th Floor , Patna and their workman Sri Surendra Pd . Yadav represented by State Secretary, UCO Bank Employees Association, Exhibition Road, Patna .
Forthe Management : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee , A.C.O. of the UCO Bank .
For the Workman : Sri B. Prasad , State Secretary, UCO Bank Employees Association , Exhibition Road, Patna.
PRESENT
: Sri Priya Saran , Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal , Patna.
AWARD
The3rd September, 2003
By adjudication order No. L- 12011 /205 /2001 - IR (B- II) dated 07-05-2002 the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi has referred under clause ( d) of Sub - section (i ) and Sub - section (2 -A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter to be referred to as ' the Act' ) , the following dispute between the Management of UCO Bank, Patna and their workman Sri Surendra Pd. Yadav for adjudication to this Tribunal:
"Whether the action of the management ofUCO Bank, Patna, in not regularising Shri Surendra Prasad Yadav isjustified? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to?" .
2.Shortly stated , workman's case is that he was orally appointed by the UCO Bank to discharge the duty ofpeon at Exhibition Road , Patna Branch of the UCO Bank with effect from April , 1986. He continued in the Bank uninterruptedly since them. A settlement was arrived at apex level on 12-10-89 with workmen's union for regularising the services of daily rated workers , who worked for 240 daysduring the period between 12-10-86 and 12-10-89 . The management subsequently empanelled him for permanent absorption as a peon . The further case of the workman is that even after elapsing of several years of said settlement his services has not been regularised and he is being deprived ofhis legitimate claims as a permanent incumbent. Asappeared no chance of his permanent absorption , the present dispute cropped up and consequently the Reference , for a decision whether the action of the Bank concerned in not regularising the service of workman Surendra Pd. Yadav is justified .
The State Secretary of UCO Bank Employees' Association appeared before me making a clear statement that good reasons have now prevailed on the management, 2803 G1/03-19
which has decided to permanently absorb the services of the workman Sri Surendra Pd . Yadav as peon and the dispute between them has ceased exist . A petition has also been filed by him with a prayer to pass a " No Dispute Award" in the light of his submission above.
3. It is well manifast in view of submissions placed before me by the State Secretary of UCO Bank Employees ' Association that the grievance of the workman Sri Surendra Pd. Yadav has been redressed by the management of UCO Bank and the same stands settled . In the circumstances aforesaid , it would be simply a futile exercise to go into the details of the claims and counter claims of the parties concerned and examine their varacity any more .
4. In the result, I hereby pass a No Dispute Award , which appears to be just and consistent on account of settlement of the controvercy between the rival parties .
5.Award accordingly. Dictated & corrected by me.
PRIYA SARAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 सितम्बर, 2003
का० भा० . 2931.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मुम्बई पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. -2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( भाग -1 ) [ संदर्भ संख्या 2/23 ऑफ 2001 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-09-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 31011/18/2000- आई आर ( एम ) ] सी० गंगाधारण , अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 12th September , 2003 S.O. 2931. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Part- I) (Ref. No. 2/23 of2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. 2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Mumbai Port Trust and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-09-2003 .
[No. L-31011 / 18/2000- IR(M) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, MUMBAI PRESENT S.N. SAUNDANKAR, PresidingOfficer 6774
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 / ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Reference No. CGIT - 2/23 of2001
aside directing the management to reinstate the workman inservice.
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MUMBAI PORT TRUST
The Chairman , Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai -400038 .
V/ s. THEIR WORKMEN
The Secretary,
Transport andDock Workers Union ,
P.D'Mello Bhawan ,
P.D'Mello-Road, CarnacBunder, Mumbai-400038 .
APPEARANCES
:
FortheEmployer
Mr. Umesh Nabar, Advocate.
For the Workmen : Mr. S.R. Wagh , Advocate .
3. Management resisted the claim of Union by Filing Written Statement ( Exhibit - 12) contending that workman remained absent unauthorisedly during the period from 1-1-1993 to 21-3-1997 total 471 days and that for his unauthorised absence show cause notice was issued on 28-10-1996 which he replied on 13-11-1996 and that consequently charge -sheet was issued to him on 27-11-1997 . It is pleaded that the Inquiry Officer giving sufficient opportunity and following the principles of natural justice conducted the inquiry and that based on the inquiry report dated 17-2-1999 . Inquiry Officer concluded the findings on his unauthorised absence which was affirmed by the Appellate Authority and that consequently workman was removed from service for the misconduct under Regulation - 3 ( 1A) of the MЫРТ Employees (conduct) Regulations 1976 and the MbPT Employees ( Classification , Control and Appeal ) Regulations , 1976. It is contended that the inquiry being fair and the findings not perverse, Workman/ Union's claim be dismissed with costs .
Mumbai , dated 5th August , 2003
4. By the Rejoinder (Exhibit- 14) Union reiterated the recitals in the Claim Statment denying the averments in the Written Statement .
AWARD PART- I
5. On the basis of pleadings issues were framed at Exhibit- 15 however in the context of preliminary issuesboth the parties did not lead oral evidence vide purshis (Exhibit- 17/18) . Union filed written submissions (Exhibit - 19 ) and theManagement (Exhibit-20).
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L-31011 / 18 /2000/IR ( M) dated 2-2-2001 and Corrigendum dated 5-2-2002 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
6. On persuing the record and the written submis- sions and hearing the counsels . I record my findings on the preliminary issues for the reasons mentioned below :
Issues
Findings
Yes.
"Whether the action of the management ofMumbai PortTrust, Mumbai in terminating the service of Shri HariKondibaMore Jt. Asstt . (OBL) by way ofremoval from service w.e.f. 25-5-1999 is legal and justified? If not what relief the workman is entitled to ?"
1. Whether the domestic inquiry conducted against the workman was as per the principles of Naturaljustice ?
No.
2. Whether the findings of the ' Inquiry Officer are perverse ? REASONS
4 2.Workman More was appointed by the management Port Trust as Junior clerk in the year 1980 and that he was promoted as Junior Assistant in the year 1990. Vide claim statement (Exhibit- 11 ) Union pleaded that due to self illness and the illness of his grandmother and wife during the period 1993-1997 he was constrained to remain absent from duty which was brought to the notice of management. However, inspite that Management issued him show cause notice and thereafter a charge - sheet dated 27-11-1997 . It is averred that because of the mental pressure workman though participated in the inquiry, could not approach the Union for assistance and that Inquiry Officer without realising the cause and non -application of mind held him guilty as chronic absentee and that based on the report he wasremoved from service from 25-5-1999 . It is contended inquiry being not proper and the findings perverse , be set
7. Admittedly as seen from the record, workman More participated in the inquiry in connection with the charge- sheet dated 27-11-1997 about his absenteeism for the period from 1993-1997 and corrigendum to that effect. According to workman he remained absent due to his mental illness . The Inquiry Officer concluded on his absenteeism vide report dated 17-2-1999 . Nothing to show that inquiry vitiates on the ground ofviolation of principles ofnatural justice and in the light of the tests laid down by Their Lordships of the Apex Court in case Sur Enamel and Stamping Works V/s . Their Workmen , 1963 II LLJ SCC 367. Onpersual the inquiry proceedings Exhibit - 16 it is apparent [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
thatbased on the documents and evidence findings on unauthorised absence were recorded by the Inquiry Officer and hence cannot be said to be perverse . Thus inquiry being fair and proper and the findings not perverse , issues are answered accordingly and hence the order.
ORDER
Thedomestic inquiry conducted against the workman was as per the principles of natural justice and findings of the InquiryOfficer are not perverse .
S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2932.- 3 932.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 6/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल. - 12011/238/ 2001 - आई आर ( बी-11 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th September , 2003 S.O. 2932. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. 6/2002 of the Central Govt. Indus . Tribunal - cum- labour Court , Jaipur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-9-2003.
[No. L- 12011 /238/2001 - IR(B - 11 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT : JAIPUR
(Case No. CGIT -6/2002)
Reference No. L - 12011 /238/2001 - IR( B - II) The General Secretary,
Bank of India Staff Union ,
Through Bank of India,
D-89 , Krishna Marg,
Bapu Nagar, Jaipur-302006.
..Applicant Union
Versus
The Regional Manager ,
Bank of India,
Raj . Zone, C- 63 - B, Sarojini Marg,
C-Scheme, Jaipur ( Rajasthan ) -302001 .
Non - Applicant
6775
PRESENT
Presiding Officer : Sh . R.C. SHARMA Forthe Applicant :
Sh. M. F. Baig
For the non -Applicant : Smt . Manju Joshi
Date ofAward :
12-08-2003
AWARD
1. In exercise ofthe powers conferred under clause 'D' of sub- Section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act ) , the Central ' Government has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , which runs as under :-
"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India , Jaipur in awarding punishment of stoppage of one increment for one year vide order dated 10-11-2000 in respect of workman Shri Manak Chand Umarwal was justified ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled for ? "
2. In the statement of claim , the applicant-Union has pleaded inter alia that the workman Sh . Manak Chand Umarwal was chargsheeted on 25-8-2000 by the non- applicant management and the enquiry conducted against him was not proper , that the management could not be able to prove the charges on the basis of its evidence , that the complainant in the enquiry could not be produced before the Enquiry Officer , that the Enquiry Officer has reached to the conclusion of the guilt without any concrete evidence and that on the days of the incidents , the workman was on leave and that the order dated 10-11-2000 by which the punishment of stoppage of one increment for one year was awarded to the workman is unjustified and , therefore , the Union has prayed to set it aside.
3.Opposing the claim , the non - applicant in his reply has denied the allegations as made by the Union and has averred that the enquiry conducted by the Department was proper and fair , that the proper opportunity to contest itwas given to the workman and that it was established by the evidence that the workman attended the office under intoxication on the said days of the incidents . It has been further stated that the order in question was challenged by the workman in the appeal , which has been rejected vide order dated 27-1-2002 passed by the appellate authority . The non- applicant has asserted that the order in question islegal and justified .
4. In the rejoinder , the applicant - Union has reiterated the facts as narrated in the statement of claim .
5. I have heard both the parties and have gone through the record.
6776
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINΑ 19, 1925
6. The Id . representative for the workman while assailing the findings arrived by the Enquiry Officer has raised the following objections:-
(i) That on both the days of the occurrence , viz. , on 26-7-2000 and 27-7-2000 , the workman was on leave and , therefore , the charge of misconduct cannot be deemed to be proved againsthim.
10. Charge No. I states that on 26-7-2000 after the lunch hour, Sh . Raj Kumar who used to supply tee to the staffers in the office hours came to the Staff Officer Sh . Ramesh Manshani and complained that Sh . Manak Chand Umarwal (workman ) is abusing him under the influence of alcohol . On his complaint , Sh. Ramesh Manshani went outside the office and found that the workman was under intoxication and he was misbehaving with Raj Kumar , who subsequently entered into the branch office and raise a hue and cry and entered into the abin of the Branch Manager without seeking any permission .
(ii) That the Branch Manager Sh . R.S. Meena has not stated in his evidence that the workman had entered into his cabin without his permission and , therefore, the alleged incident stated to be occurred on 27-7-2000 is not proved.
11. The second charge reads that on 27-7-2000 when Sh.Ramesh Manshani at about 8.30 am came to open the office, he found that the workman was abusing to Raj Kumar and was found under intoxication . This information was conveyed to the Branch Manager .
(iii) That the principal witness in the enquiry was Raj Kumar, with whom it is alleged that the workman had raised a quarrel and who had complained it to the Staff Officer Sh . Ramesh Manshani , who could not be produced in the evidence and , therefore, the charge cannot be said to be proved against the workman .
12. The third charge speaks that on the same date i.e. on 27-7-2000 at about 12.15pm , the workman came into the office , to whom the Staff Officer attempted to serve a memorandum , but he declined to accept it and misbehaved withhim.
(iv) That the Enquiry Officer has not appreciated the defence evidence .
13. Now , the point- wise discussion follows as under:-
(v) That no medical report with regard to the consumption of alcohol by the workman could be produced on behalf of the management and , therefore , it cannot be presumed that the workman has taken alcohol on the said dates ofincident.
(vi ) That there is no documentary evidence that the workman had refused to acknowledge the memo which was given to him by Sh . Ramesh Manshani , and lastly .
(vii) That the incident occurred out side the office premises and, therefore , the charges of the misconduct levelled against the workman are not proved.
7. On the other hand, controverting the contentions inade on behalf of the Union , the Id. representative on behalfofthe management submits that all the three charges which the Enquiry Officer has found to be proved against the workman are based upon the reliable evidence .
*
14. So far as the first objection submitted on behalf of the Union that the workman was on leave on both the days of occurrence is concerned , it is well - established on the basis of the evidence that on both days , the workman had entered into the office and has misbehaved with Staff Officerand thereby committed the misconduct. The second charge relates to the occurrance committed on 27-7-2000 at about 3.30am when Sh . Ramesh Manshani came to the office to open it, then he found that the workman was abusing Raj Kumar and he was under intoxication . He has further deposed that he asked to the workman to open the lock, but he refused on the ground that he was on leave . If the workman was on leave on that day , then why at that time he was present in front of the office ? It could not be explained on behalf of the Union . It appears that the workman had came there to report for the duty and was under the influence of intoxication which is relatable to his official duty and the plea of his being on the leave on the said date reflects to be an afterthought plea. Therefore , this objection raised on behalf of the workman is devoid of any substance and is rejected .
8. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions .
9. In short , vide chargesheet dated 25-7-2000 , four chargesofmisconduct were levelled against the workman and the Enquiry Officer in his report dated 3-10-2000 has reached to a conclusion that the first three charges are fully established on the basis of the evidence , whereas he has found that the charge no . 4 is not proved against the workman.
15. It has been contended that the Branch Manager Sh . R.S. Meena has not stated in his evidence that the workman had entered into his cabin . But this contention is not supported by the evidence of Sh . R.S. Meena who in his examination - in- chief has specifically deposed that on 26-7-2000 at about 3 pm when he was sitting in his chamber with Sh. Ramesh Manshani , the workman Sh . Manak Chand came into his cabin and began to explain the incident which had taken place outside the office . He has further 6777 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
stated that he had found Sh . Manak Chand under intoxication of alcohol . Therefore , this objection raised on behalf of the workman is not maintainable .
he had handed over a memo to Sh . Masmani to get it served on the workman , but subsequently Sh . Masmani intimated to him that the workman had refused to receive that memo . As has already been pointed out, no fact emerges out on the record which goes to disbelieve the testimony of both these witnesses on this account . Hence , I find that there is no force in this contention advanced by the ld. representative for the Union and thus it is untenable .
23. Lastly , it has been also contended on behalf of the workman that the incidents were committed outside the office premises and , therefore , the charges levelled against the workman cannot be found to be proved .
16. It has been argued on behalf of the Union that the Sh . Raj Kumar could not be produced by the management in support of the charges . True it is that Sh . Raj Kumar could not produced during the course of the enquiry, but it nowhere reflects that he was voluntarily withheld by the management , but it is evident from the record that he cold not be traced out . Moreover, the sufficient evidence to prove the charges levelled against the workman has been produced on behalf of the management . Therefore, this argument is devoid of the force and is negativated.
17. Then, it is has been also contended on behalf or the workman that the defence evidence could not be appreciated by the Enquiry Officer . Enquiry Officer has found the defence evidence as reliable testimony .
24. So far as this objection is concerned, it does not receive support from the evidence available on record . Under charge no. I , the management has led the evidence that the workman had entered into the office and misbehaved with Sh . Ramesh Mashani . With regard to the charge no . 2. Sh . Mashani has categorically stated in his examination - in-chiefthat 27-7-2000 at about 8.30 am when he came to the office to open it , he asked Sh . Manak Chand to open the lock , but he refused and stated that he was on leave and quarrelled with him . Similarly, charge no . 3 also relates to the incident at the time when the workman came into the office and Sh . Mashani tried to serve the memo on him.
18. I have carefully persued the defence evidence adduced on behalf of the workman which is only negative evidence with regard to the occurrences . On a perusal of the defence evidence , such as the evidence of Shri Pappu , the presence of the witness appears to be doubtful at the time of the occurrence . The evidence of Shri Ramesh Manshani and Shri . R.S. Meena, who appears to be independent witnesses in the case , could not be shaken and there is no reason to discard their evidence . Therefore , in my considered opinion , this objection raised on behalf ofthe workman is found to be without my substance and is not sustainable .
25. The Id. representative in support ofhis contention has drawn my attention towards the decision reported in L.L.J 95 ( II ) 335 wherein it has been observed that " any Act subversive of discipline committed outside the premise is also misconduct. Any act unrelatable to the service committted outside the factory would not amount to misconduct."
19. The Id. representative for the Union has further contended that to establish this fact that the workman at the time ofthe incident was under intoxication , no medical report could be produced in the evidence .
26. But the Hon'ble Court in continuation has further expressed its views as under : -
20. It is a well - settled principal that in the domestic enquiry the strictproof of guilt is not required as is required in the matter of a criminal case . Beyond it , on the basis of the evidence adduced by management , this fact is fully established that the workman at the time of the incidents was under the influence of the liquor and thus , had committed the misconduct . Therefore , the contention canvassed by the Id. representative for the Union does not bear any significance and is not tenable .
"But when misconduct vis - a vis the officers of the management is committed outside the factory, certainly the same would be an act subversive of disciplne . The object appears to be that workmen need to maintain discipline vis - a-vis its management. What amount of misconduct is a question of fact. It would be decided with reference to the facts , the situation in which the act was alleged to have been committed and the attending circumstances leading thereto ."
27. There fore , in the light of the observation supra , the acts of the workman are found relatable to his official duties and thus amount to misconduct . Therefore , the submission urged on behalf of the workman cannot be maintained.
21. The Id. representative has too argued that this fact has not been proved that the workman had refused totake the memo from Sh . Ramesh Mashani . He contends thatif he had refused to accept it , then there ought to have been an endorsement on the memo to this effect which doesnot find place on the memo .
28. On the reappraisal of the evidence , the findings arrived at by the Enquiry Officer do not appear to be perverse and therefore , no interference to be made therein . All the three charges levelled against the workman are 22. Sh . Ramesh Mashani in his examination - in- chief has deposed that he tried to serve the memo on Sh . Manak Chand but he did not accept it and replied in indecent . manner . Sh . R. S. Meena has corroborated this factum that
;
6778
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 / ASVINA 19, 1925
fully established on the basis of the evidence available on therecord.
29. I have considered also the issue of quantum of punishment .
30. The disciplinary authority by the said order has awarded the punishment of stoppage of one increment for one year, which looking to the circumstances , appears to bejustified and is not excessive .
31. For the foregoing reasons , the workman has not been able to establish his claim which is liable to be dismissed. Therefore , the reference is answered in the negative and an award is passed in the terms that the order dated 10-11-2000 awarding the punishment of stoppage of one increment for one year on the workman is justified .
32. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 10 ( 1 ) of the Act.
R.C. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2933.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार संकर केमिकल लाइम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई के पंचाट [ संदर्भ सं० 64/2003 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-09-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल०-29011/106/2002- आई० आर० ( विविध ) ]
बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th September , 2003 S.O. 2933- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (RefNo. 64/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum -Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Sanker Chemical Lime and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 15-09-2003 .
[No. L- 29011 / 106/2002- IR(M) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Thursday, the 11th September , 2003
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Present : K.JAYARAMAN ,
PRESIDING OFFICER
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ΝΟ . 64/2003 [ In the matter of the dispute for ajdudication under clause (d) ofSub -section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 ( A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of Sankar Chemical Lime and their workmen].
BETWEEN
: I Party/ Claimant The General Secretary , Cement& Quarry Workers Union, Sanker Nagar Post.
AND
The Partner,
II Party/Management Sanker Chemical Lime , Tirunelveli.
APPEARANCE :
Forthe Claimant
: None
Forthe Management
Sri S. Jayaraman &
V. V. Balasubramanian, Advocates .
ORDER
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour Vide Notifcation Order No. L- 29011 / 106/2002 - IR( M ) dated 02-04-2003 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-
Whether the termination of services of Shri S.Murugan & 9 workers isjustified ? If not, to what reliefthey are entitled for ? "
2. The matter was taken up on the file of this Tribunal as I.D. No. 64/2003 and notices were issued to both sides . The II Party/Management alone entered appearance through an advocate . No Claim Statement was filed on behalf of the I Party/Claimant . None appeared on behalf of the I Party / Claimant even after two notices sent by registered post . It appears that the Petitioner Union is not interested in pursuing the reference ..
3. In view of the above circumstances, the present reference is returned to Ministry for want of prosecution . The Central Government is informed accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 1 Ith September, 2003 ) .
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर, 2003
का.आ. 2934.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण, कोलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.-12012/48/91- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
6779
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
the jurisdiction of this Tribunal . Subsequently the Government of India as per letter dated 13-3-1995 directed this Tribunal to adjudicate this dispute. Accordingly this dispute was again registered here as I.D. 2/95 .
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 16th September, 2003 S.O. 2934. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 2/95 ) of the Industrial Tribunal , Kollam as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 22-8-2003 .
[No. L- 12012/48/91 -IR (B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, KOLLAM (Dated , this the 7th day of August , 1995)
PRESENT : SRI C. N. SASIDHARAN INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
IN INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 2/95 BETWEEN
The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, M.G. Road, Ernakulam -682011 .
(By Sri Sidharthan, Advocate , Ernakulam)
and
(Sri C.V. Jacob , Chathamal Veedu, Manjikuzhi , Kottayam -686004)
(By Sri Paulson C. Varghese , Advocate , Ernakulam) AWARD
This Industrial Dispute has been referred for adjudication to this Tribunal by Government of India as perOrder No. L. - 12012/ 48/91-IR (B - II) dated nil.
The issue for adjudication is the following "Whether the action on the part of the management ofCentral Bank of India in awarding Punishment of discharge from service to Shri . C. V. Jacob , Clerk w.e.f. 21-10-1989 is legal andjustified? If not, to what reliefis the workmen entitled ? " .
II . This reference was originally registered here as 1.D. No. 49/91 and while the matter was pending here it was transferred to Industrial Tribunal , Idukki due to change in III . Shri C.V. Jacob was discharged from service accepting the findings of guilt against him by an enquiry officer who conducted a domestic enquiry into 2 charges raised against the workman. The management justifies their action while according to the workman he is innocent . He has further contended that there was no proper domestic enquiry.
IV. The validity of the domestic enquiry was considered as apreliminary issue and this Tribunal by order dated 15-7-1995 held that the domestic enquiry was properly conducted and the findings are correct . I shall reproduce below that order in full to understand the rival contentions raised by the parties :-
ORDER
This reference concerns the discharge of Sri C.V. Jacob with effect from 21-10-1989 from the service of Central Bank ofIndia.
2. The management before initiating disciplinary proceedings against the workman issued a charge- sheet dated 12-4-1988 alleging two charges which are briefly as below:
Charge No. 1. Sri C.V. Jacob , while working as a clerk, Palai Branch got discounted a cheque for Rs. 1,600 drawn on Canara Bank, Kottayam by M/ s . A.R. Group , Building contractors through the account of Sri . P.A. Abdul Rahiman , A - 1 Ladies Store , Palai who is a HSS account holder of Palai Branch . The said cheque when presented for payment was returned unpaid with the reason " Refer to Drawer " . Sri Jacob , thus , misused his official position for his personal benefit.
Charge No. 2. Sri Jacob was working in despatch department. The said cheque Purchasedby Palai Branch under BP 694 which was to be forwarded to Kottayam branch for clearing along with OCC 422 and OCD 692 in registered cover 2837. But the same was not included in the said cover though the same was entered in the despatch register. When the other two instruments viz . OCC 422and OCD 692 were realised, Palai Branch enquired the rate , ofBP 694 .
The workman did not file any explanation to the charge memo. Therefore, the managment ordered a domestic enquiry in which also the workman did not participate . The enquiry officer found the workman guilty of one charge and appellate authority on appeal by the workman found the workman guilty of the two charges . The management accepting the finding has inflicted the present punishment .
6780
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3. The workman has filed a detailed claim statement against his dismissal and the contentions are briefly as under:
Theworkmanwas working as clerk at the Palai Branch ofthe management Bank and he has uninterrupted service record of so may years . While working so he was issued a memo dated 2-1-1989 alleging some misconducts with regard to discounting of cheque and removal of cheque from a registered cover. He has replied pleading not guilty. The management issued a charge sheet dated 12-4-1988 alleging two charges . The charges are absolutely unsustainable and he is not guilty of the charges. The enquiry officer even after the enquiry was not aware of the nature of the misconducts . Unfortunately the workman could not participate in the enquiry due to his illness . He was represented by his wife with medical certificate on all postings of the enquiry and application for adjournment was also submitted. But the enquiry officer rejected the application for adjournment and declared him ex -parte. He was not informed of such a decision with ulterior intentionto victimise him. Qualified Doctors certified that theworkman was suffering from psychological observation and assessment and advised him to stay in the hospital for few more days . The enquiry officer without giving reasonable time to the workman to recover from the illness andto participate in the enquiry, arbitrarily completed the enquiry. The action of the enquiry officer is illegal and he failed toconsider that the workman is suffering from mental depression . The action is unjustified and flagrant violation ofnatural justice . The findings of the enquiry officer are unsustainable and unsupported by legal evidence. It is perverse also. It is also stated that the punishment imposed is severe and disproportionate. According to him he is unemployed and it is not possible to get an employment at this stage. The prayer is for reinstatement in service with allbenefits .
the request and medical certificate . He was declared ex- parte on the third posting as he was avoiding departmental enquiry by producing medical certificates of different Doctors though his wife. The tactics adopted by the workman was to delay the enquiry proceedings . He did not turn up on any of the subsequent days fixed for the enquiry despite giving him notice about the sittings . The enquiry officer has given ample opportunity to the workman to defend his case and there was not denial of natural justice . There is not violation of Principles of Natural Justice . He was served with copy of day today enquiry proceedings with intimation about the subsequent sittings . All formalities under Bipartite settlement were observed in the enquiry proceedings. The charges levelled against the workman were proved by documentary as well as oral evidence. After verifying the entire enquiry record and the findings of the enquiry officer the disciplinary authority also agreed with the findings of the enquiry officer . Before issuing the punishment he was given a futher chance. The punishment was imposed after considering all the aspects . The appellate authority also considered the entire enquiry proceedings before confirming the punishment . The workman was charge sheeted on a prior occasion also and he was found guilty in the departmental enquiry. He was awarded a punishment of discharge from service by the disciplinary authority which was subsequently reduced to stoppage of three increments permanently by the appellate authority by giving him an opportunity to mend himself. But he has not changed his attitude and keeping such a person in the service of banking institution will be highly risky. The management denies all other allegations . The action ofthe enquiry officer was not arbitrary. There is no perversity in the findings of the enquiry officer and the punishment imposed is fair and proportionate. The workman isnot entitled to any relief. The workman has subsequently filed a petition stating that the documents produced in the enquiry were not certified under the Bankers Books Evidence Act and the management failed to produce original documents . The management has filed a counter stating that originals were produced along with the copies and the copies are duly certified.
5. The workman has a contention that the enqui.y was conducted in violation of the principles of natural justice and the findings are pereverse and not supported by legal evidence . Therefore , legality and validity of the domestic enquriy was considered as a preliminary issue . The enquiry officer was examined as MW1 and the enquiry file containing the enquiry proceedings , connected papers , statement of witnesses and the findings of the enquiry officer has been marked as Ext . M1 . The workman has also givenevidence as WW1 .
4. The management opposes the claim statement. The contentions advanced by the management are briefly asunder : The workman approached one Sri P.A. Abdul Rahman, an account holder of the Palai Branch and requested him to discount a cheque for Rs . 1 , 600 and got itdiscounted. The cheque was purchased by the Palai Branch and when it was sent for collection it is returned unpaid with the remark " refer to the drawyer " . So the action of the workman in approaching a customer for discounting a cheque for himself and the subsequent dishonouring is highly irregular. He this himself used his offical position for his personal benefit and therefore guilty of misconduct under clause 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite settlement dated 19-10-1986 . The workman again removed a cheque while working as despatch clerk and committed the second charge as detailed in the charge memo . Though he was served with charge memo he did not submit any explanation. Hence , domestic enquiry was ordered. The enquiry officer adjourned the enquiry on twice accepting
6. The main point of attack against the enquiry is that the enquiry was conducted without affording sufficient opportunity to the workman to defend his case. According to the learned counsel for the workman the enquiry officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
failed to consider that the workman was suffering from mental depression and he was undergoing treatment and also that the enquiry officer failed to wait till the workman was recovered from his illness. It is also that case that because of the mental depression the workman could not submit any proper explanation to the charge memo . It is evident from Ext . M1 enquiry file that the workman was given notice of the first posting of the enquiry and he produced a medical certificate through Palai Branch manager. The enquiry was adjourned to 30-5-1989 with sufficient notice to the workman . On 30-5-1989 also he did not attend the enquiry and the enquiry was adjourned to 8-6-1989 . On that day also he did not turn up. Since the workman produced medical certificate from different Doctors the enquiry officer felt that it was only a tactics of the workman to delay the enquiry proceedings and hence he was declared ex -parte . This was admittedly informed to the workman by the enquiry officer. The enquiry officer has categorically deposed that the workman or his wife never appeared before him and the application and medical certificates were submitted through Palai branch manager and also though the Presenting Officer of the management . Though the workman was set ex -parte on 8-6-1989 , the enquiry was adjourned to 15-6-1989 with notice to the workman which he was admittedly received. He did not turnup and not moved any application for adjournment or producedmedical certificate . As per the medical certificate producedby him on 1-6-1989 rest was adviced for 15 days only. Though he was admittedly informed that he was set ex-parte on 8-6-1989 he has not taken any steps to set aside that decision and attempted to prove the geniuneness ofthemedical certificate which was doubted by the enquiry officer. Since the workman failed to attend on 15-6-1989 , the enquiry was proceed and it was again adjourned to 24-6-1989 .
7. The workman has admitted that he was served with notice regarding posting of the enquiry on 26-4-1989 .
Thereafter the enquiry officer has served the workman copy ofthe enquiry proceedings with a letter dated 19-6-1989 affording opportunity again for participating in the enquiry when the workman failed to attend the enquiry on again 24-6-1989 the enquiry officer issued notice which was also admittedly received by the workman . Then gain copy of the agrument note of the management was also admittedly served on the workman. He has requested 15 days time for reply which was also allowed. He has submitted a reply dated 26-7-1989 totally denying the charges . There is no allegation that he was not given opportunity to defend his case. It is thus clear that the enquiry officer has afforded sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the delinquent to participate in the enquiry. No doubt the action of the enquiry officer in setting the workman ex -parte on 15-6-1989 though as per the medical certificate produced bythe workman on 1-6-1989 he was advised rest till 15-6- 1989 is not fully correct . But the enquiry officer doubted the genuineness of the medical certificate which was 2803 G1/03-20
6781 informed to the workman and he has not taken any steps to prove the genuineness . The enquiry officer even after setting the workman ex-parte has issued notice regarding the subsequent postings also affording sufficient opportunities toparticipate in the enquiry. But the workman failed to do so. Therefore the action of the enquiry officer is justified . So the contention that the enquiry was conducted without affording reasonable apportunity and inviolation ofthe principles of natural justice is devoid of merit.
1 8. According to the workman because of his mental depression he could not file explanation to the charge memo andhe could not participate in the enquiry. It has come out inevidence from the workman as WW1 before this Tribunal that while treatment was going on he was aware that the enquiry is proceeding. He has further stated that his wife told him about that and that he was in a position to understand things which was told to him . The above statement of the workman make it clear that he was conscious of the conduct of the enquiry and he was aware ofwhatwas happening . Even then he did not participate in the enquiry on any date though he was given notice of every postingby the enquiry officer. He has not produced anyMedical Certificate after 1-6-1989 showing that he was under treatment or under medical observation after 15-6-1989 . So the argument on behalf of the workman that he could not give any explanation to the charge memo and he could notparticipate in the enquiry due to illness cannot be accepted.
9. The learned counsel for the workman has a contention that the records produced in the enquiry were not duly certified as per Sec. 2(8 ) of the Bankers Book Evidence Act and those documents cannot be acted upon in the absence of originals which were not produced . The enquiry officer has deposed categorically that the management has produced the documents certified by the Branch Manager and whenever required original documents were also produced. On a perusal of the documents relied on by the enquiry officer it is evident that the material documents are duly certified by the branch manager. Therefore the decision relied on by the learned counsel for the workman reported in (1987 II LLJ 533 ) has no application here. Hence this contention is only to be rejected.
10. On behalf of the workman there is yet another contention that the findings of the enquiry officer are not supported by evidence and also perverse . On going through the evidence adduced in the enquiry it is clear that the management has examined the personto whon the workman approached for discounting the cheque and that witness as MW2 in the enquiry has given detailed statement regarding the misconduct of the workman. The evidence ofbranch manager Palai Branch , the bill collector Palai branch and the scale- I Officer clearly establish the charges levelled against the workman . The deposition of these 6782
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ ASVINA 19 , 1925
witnesses are supported by documents as well . The evidence adduced on behalf of the management clearly establish the charges levelled against the workman. By no stretch of imagination it can be said that the findings ofthe enquiry officer regarding charge No. 1 are preverse . But the enquiryofficer failed to analyse the evidence properly while considering charge No. 2. the findings of the enquiry officer with regard to second charge is notjustified as the evidence on record clearly prove this charge also and the appellate authority on detailed consideration of the evidence found the workman guilty of both charges . This contention of the learned counsel is also without force.
11. From the discussion made above I have no hesitation to hold that the enquiry was conducted fully in compliance with the principles of natural justice and the findings of the enquiry officer with regard to charge No. I are proper , valid and supported by legal evidence .
12. In view of the above , I hold that the enquiry is proper and valid ,
V. The question now remains for consideration is regarding the propriety ofpunishment. The learned counsel for the workman would contend that the enquiry officer found the workman guilty of only one charge but the disciplinary authority without serving notice to the workman held him guilty of two charges . This accordingto the learned counsel is violative of the principles of natural justice . Further argument is that even the finding of the enquiry officer regarding the first charge cannot also stand as the Bipartite settlement which is a material document was not produced in the enquiry. The further argument is that the punishment imposed is excessive and the workman isunemployed since his discharge from the Bank. He is the only bread winner of the family and hence he deserves sympathatic consideration and reinstatement in service. This argument is counteredby the learned counsel for the management. According to the learned councel non production of the Bipartite settlement was never challenged by the workman at any stage of the enquiry or before appellate authority or in the claim statement filed before this Tribunal and hence that argument is only an after thought. With respect to the finding of the disciplinary authority regarding the second charge it is pointed out that the workman was given show cause notice dated 4-10- 1989 affording opportunity to the workman by the clisciplinary authority and the workman failed to respond . Further this contention was not raised before the appellate authority and the disciplinary authority came to the conclusion on the basis of the evidence available in the enquiryand after affording opportunity to the delinquent . According to the learned counsel the charges now proved against the workman are grave enough warrenting maximum punishment . Further the workman had committed thevery same charge earlier and he was allowed to continue on humanitarian ground and if such a person is allowed to continue it will affect the reputation of the Bank which is
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] already lost due to the conduct of the workman. Further it has affected ofthe confidence of the customer in the Bank and the continuance of such a person will adversely affect the Banking system itself. It is also pointed out that when the workman was found guilty of the charges in a properly conducted enquiry and in the absence of any evidence regarding victimisation or unfair labour practice this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment .
VI . As I have held in the order quoted above enquiry officer found the workman guilty of charge No. 1. It is true that the evidence in the enquiry proves charge No. 2 as held by the disciplinary authority. But the disciplinary authority came to that conclusion without affording any oportunity to the workman . No. doubt the workman was given a show cause notice dated 4-10-1989 . But by that notice the workman was informed about the finding already entered into by the disciplinary authority regarding the second charge and the workman was afforded opportunity to submit anything only regarding the proposed/ punishment by discharge from service . This show cause notice itself shows that the disciplinary authority entered his finding regarding second charge arbitrarly and the action of the disciplinary authority is violative of the principles of natural justice . Hence that finding had to do. I seek support for the above from a decision of the High Court ofKerala in Thobias V. State of Kerala ( 1987 II LLJ 301) . The High Court while considering a similar question has held thus in para 4 of the judgement:
"When the enquiry officer's findings are favourable to the Petitioner a dissent from such findings should have been made only after giving the affected person an opportunity. Principles of natural justice cannot be given a go -bye even for making administrative orders . The requirements of natural justice in a given case must depend to a great extent on the facts and circumstances of each case ."
It istrue that the workman has not raised a specific contention before the appellate authority regarding the action of deciplinary authority stated above . But that cannotjustify the findings of the disciplinary authority in the given circumstances particularly in the light of the above decision .
VII . Now remains charge No. 1. The argument that Bipartite settlement was not produced has been advanced for the first time. Though sufficient opportunities had been afforded the workman failed to participate in the enquiry and raise such a contention . The management was never called uponto produce the Bipartite settlement . Before the appellate authority also no such contention was raised. Even in the claim statement failed before this Tribunal also no such specific contention is seen raised. Hence this contention can only be considered as an after thought and cannot be accepted. Further it is not established that any prejudice has been caused to the workman due to the non production of the Bipartite settlement. Charge No. 1 is 6783 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
reinstatement of workman passed by the Industrial Tribunal was liable to be interfered with as it was passed in excessive excercise ofjurisdiction" .
The above decisions fully support the view taken by me above .
IX. In the result , an award is passed holding that the action on the part of the management of Central Bank ofIndia in awarding punishment of discharge from service to Sri. C.V. Jacob, Clerk with effect from 21-10-1989 is legal andjustified and therefore he is not entitled to any relief.
Sd/-
C.N. SASIDHARAN , Industrial Tribunal APPENDEX
Witness examined on the side of the Management MW1 . Sri . M.P. Mallia Witness examined on the side of the workman WW1 . Sri C. V. Jacob .
definitely grave enough considering the position held by theworkman in the Bank . He was working as a clerk in the Bank where the service ofthe Bank is regarding the money transaction . The workman was not working as a originary clerk in a Government Department . The conduct of the workman defenitely affected the reputation of the Bank and the confidence of the customer in the Bank. It may be recalled that the workman had committed almost the very same misconduct earlier and he was ordered to be discharged from service . But he was allowed to continue on humanitarian ground affording opportunity to mend his ways . But there is no change in his conduct and he has repeated the very same misconduct . Continuance of such aworkman in the Bank is not all advisable . Considering the entire circumstances in toto I am of opinion that the punishment ofdischarge imposed by the management Bank is only commensurate with the gravity of the misconduct proved against the workman . That being the position no interference is called for from this Tribunal .
Document marked on the side of the Management Ext . Ml . Enquiry file containing, enquiry proceedings , enquiry report , Statement of witness and connected documents .
नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर, 2003
VIII . In this case the enquiry was found to be proper and valid. The workman is found to be guilty of the same misconduct for the second time . There is no evidence of victimisation or unfair labour practice . In this State ofaffairs no interference is called for from this Tribunal in the matter ofpunishment . This view is supported by a decision ofthe High Court ofKerala in Chala Beedi Workers Industrial Co- operative Society V. Bharathan ( '93 XI KLT short note No.. 10). In that case the court while considering the scope and ambit of the provisions contained in Sec . 11 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act (the Act for short) the court held thus:-
का. आ. 2935. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार तमिलनाडू मैग्नेसाईट लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-09-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल. - 29012/7/2002- आई. आर ( विविध ) ] बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th September, 2003 "When a proper enquiry has been held by an employer on the charge of misconduct and the finding of misconduct is a plausible conclusion emerging from the evidence adduced at the said enquiry and the punishment was awarded on the basis of the finding of the enquiry officer the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to sit in judgement over the decision of the employer as an appellate body and the interference of the decision of the employer will be justified only when the findings arrived at by the enquiry officer is perverse or management is guilty ofvictimisation , unfair labour practice or malafide" .
S.O. 2935.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 16/2003 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tibunal -cum -Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Tamil Nadu Magnesite Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-09-03.
The High Court of Rajasthan in a latest decision in AnsarMohammed V. Judge , Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Udaipur ( 1995 LAB . I. C. NOG 23 ) (Raj . ) while considering the powers of Tribunal under section ii -A of the Act held as below :-
[No. L-29012/7/2002 -IR(M)] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy. ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHENΝΑΙ
Thursday, the 4th September, 2003 Present: K. JAYARAMAN, PresidingOfficer
"The power under S. 11 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act is not unbridled and cannot be excercised arbitrarily or without application of mind to the facts and circumstances of each case . Therefore where a workman was dismissed on the charge ofmisconduct and he was found guilty of committing same misconduct on earlier occasions also , the order of 6784
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 16/2003 (Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of Sub-section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , between theManagement of Tamil Nadu Magnesite Ltd. and their workmanSri K. Rajendran. )
BETWEEN
SriK. Rajendran
: I Party/Workman
AND
II Party/Management Tamil Nadu Magnesite Ltd.: Salem.
Appearance :
For the Workman
: M/ s . S.B. Viswanathan & P. Raghu Raja, Advocates .
For the Management : Sri M.R. Raghavan, Advocates .
ORDER
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L - 29012/7 /2002 - IR(M) dated 13-11-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-
"Whether the action of the management ofM/s . Tamil Nadu Magnesite Ltd. in terminating the service of Shri K. Rajendran is justified? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled? "
2. The matter was taken up on the file ofthis Tribunal as I.D. No. 16/2003 and notices were issued to both sides . Even though the I Party/Workman entered appearance through an advocate , no Claim Statement was filed on behalf of the Petitioner . The Petitioner /Workman has not appeared even after three notices. It appears that the Petitioner/Workman is not interested in pursuing the reference .
3. In view of the above circumstances , the present reference is returned to Ministry for want of prosecution. The Central Government is informed accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 4th September , 2003. )
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2936. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 7 ( C)/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-09-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.-12012/198/2001- आई. आर. ( बी. II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव
[PART II- SEC. 3(ii) ] New Delhi , the 17th September , 2003 S.O. 2936.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 7 (c)/2003 ) of the Industrial Tribunal PATNA (BIHAR) as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of UCO Bank , and their workman , received bythe Central Government on 15-09-03 .
[No. L - 12012/ 198/2001 - IR(B -II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
Office of the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal , Patna.
Reference Case No. 7 (C) of2003 .
Management of UCO Bank, Mauryalock Complex, A-Block, 4th Floor, Patna and their workman Sri Shailesh Kumar, Peon represented by the State Secretary, UCO Bank Employees Association, Exhibition Road , Patna.
For the Management : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee , A.C.O. of the UCO Bank .
Forthe Workman: Sri B. Prasad , State Secretary, UCO Bank Employees Association , Exhibition Road, Patna .
Present:
Sri Priya Saran , Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal , Patna . AWARD
The 4th September , 2003
By adjudication order No. L/ 12012/ 198/2001 - IR (B- II ) dated 08-04-2002 the Government of India , Ministry ofLabour , New Delhi has referred under clause (d) of Sub- section ( i) and Sub- Section (2 - A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter to be referredto as ' the Act' ) , the following dispute between the Management of UCO Bank and their workman Sri Shailesh Kumar, Peon for adjudication to this Tribunal:
"Whether the action of the Management of UCO Bank, Patna in not regularising Shri Shailesh Kumar isjustified? If not , what reliefthe workman is entitled to?"
2. Shortly stated, workman's case is that he was orally appointed by the UCO Bank to discharge the duty of a peon at Sarai Branch ( Dist. Vaishali ) of the Bank with effect from November, 1987. He continued in the Bank uninterruptedly since then . A settlement was arrived at apex level on 12-10-89 with workmen's union for regularising the services of daily rated workers , who worked for 240 daysduring the period between 12-10-86 and 12-10-89. The management on scruitinising the claim of the workmen empanelled him for permanent absorption as a peon . The further case of the workman is that even after elapsing of several years of said settlement his services has not been regularised and he is being deprived of his legitimate cliams as a permanent incumbent . As appeared no chance of his permanent absorption, the present dispute cropped up and consequently the Reference , for a decision whether the [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
6785
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
action of the Bank concerned in not regularising the services ofworkman Sri Shailesh Kumar , Peon is justified.
The State Secretary of UCO Bank Employees ' Association appeared before me making a clear statement thatgood reasons have now prevailed on the management , which has decided to permanently absorb the services of theworkman Sri Shailesh Kumar as peon and the dispute between them has ceased to exist . Apetition has also been filedby him with a prayer to pass a " No Dispute Award" in the light of his submission above.
3. It is well manifest in view of submissions placed before me by the State Secretary of UCO Bank Employees ' Association that the grievance ofthe workman Sri Shailesh Kumar has been redressed by the management of UCO Bank and the same stands settled. In the circumstances aforesaid, it would be simply a futile exercise to go into the details of the claims and counter claims of the parties concerned and examine their varacity any more.
4. In the result, I hereby pass a No Dispute Award, which appears to be just and consistent on account of settlement of the controversy between the rival parties.
5. Award accordingly.
PRIYA SARAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर, 2003
का० आ० 2937. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 139/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 12011/95/2001- आई. आर ( बी. II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 17th September , 2003 S.O. 2937. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 139/2001 ofthe Central Govt. Industrial Tibunal -cum -Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Union Bank of India, and their workman, received by the Central Government on 16-9-2003.
[No. L- 12011/95/2001 -IR(B- II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW PRESENT :
SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer I. D. No. 139/2001 Ref. No. L- 12011 / 95/2001 /IR (B -II )
dated 31-8-2001
BETWEEN
Union Bank of India Staff
Association , Secretary,
UB Staff Asson . C / o Union Bank of India, 24/53 , Birhana Road , Kanpur (U. P. ) 208001
AND
Asstt . General Manager UnionBank of India, Pandu Nagar Kanpur (U. P.)
AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide their order No. L- 12011 /95/2001/IR (B - II ) dated 31-8-2001 has referred the following issue for adjudication to this Tribunal:
"Whether the action of the Assistant General Manager, Union Bank of India, Kanpur in depriving Shri Madhukar Pandey and Shri A. K. Sharma from special allowance of Computer Operator from April 1999 to the date of permanent posting of Computer Operator is legal and justified ? If not , what reliefthe concerned workmen are entitled to ? "
Union Bank of India Staff Association's case in brief is that as per the policy of the bank the post of Computer Operator attracting higher allowance at the station is filled from the list of candidates who have cleared the test held for the purpose . In the absence of any list , the vacancy at the station is filled on the seniority basis . That is to say that the senior most clerk at the station is asked to work as Computer Operator temporarily and is paid the special allowance of Rs . 4 10/- per month accordingly. During the period ofdispute there were 6 posts of Computer Operators atthe ServiceBranch, Kanpur . From the list of candidates prepared after conducting the test as per rules , 5 posts of computer operator were filled from the list at Service Branch Kanpur. Since there was no other candidates left in the list , the 6th post should have been filled by assigning the job ofcomputer operator to the senior most clerk of the station as per the policy of the bank. Sri Madhukar Pandey and Sri A. K. Sharma, were senior most clerks at the station and therefore they were entitled to work as a computer operator at service branch and accordingly entitled for special allowance of Rs. 410/- per month for the period detailed in annexure, as per policy of the bank . Instead of asking the above two workmen to work as computer operator, the management ofthe bank acting under their own whims and fancies and flouting all the established norms and policies illegally and paid the allowance to a clerk junior to the above two and denied the claim of the above two to which they were legitimately entitled for. Association therefore has requested that the management of Union Bank of India be directed to pay the special allowance to A. K. Sharma andMadhukar Pandey.
The O.P. has denied the claim of the association it is submitted by the O.P. that as per the policy whenever any leave vacancy in any branch arises , the same to be filled up from, among the senior most clerks available and posted at the branch. It is further, submitted that A.K. Sharma & Madhukar Pandey were not posted in service branch at 6786
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11, 2003/ ASVINA 19 , 1925
that time and since they did not performed the duties as such not entitled to get any relief. The O.P. has also stated thatvacancies are occurred at service branch Kanpur were on account of leave of staff or due to absence of any permanent computer operator posted at branch. In fact there was no additional vacancy arose in the service branch nor any new vacancy had been created for adhoc computer operator at the branch . Whenever any leave vacancy in anybranch arises, the same is to be filled from among the senior most clerks available and posted at the branch . It is also submitted that there is no provision in promotion policy which stipulates that any vacancy occured on account of leave should not be filled up from senior staff members available at the branch and should be filled up on the basis ofstationwise seniority. It is well settled law that such type ofallowances are paid to only those persons who actually performed their duties as such claim of Madhukar Pandey and A.K. Sharma are not legally tenable .
Theworkers has filed following documents in support of his case :-
1. Photostat copy of promotion policy for clerical stafffor promotion to officer cadre and policy ofhigher assignment in clerical cadre , paper no. 5/2 .
2. Photostat copy of higher assignment of duties on temporary basis paper no. 5/3 .
3. Photostat copy of staff circular no . 4058 of 3-3-94 regarding selection of computer operator paper no. 5/4 & 5/5 .
4. Photostat copy of sentority as on 31.12.95 paper no . 5/6 to5/7.
5. Photostat copy of payment voucher dated 12-1-2000 in respect ofpayment to P.K.Tewari. A.K. Awasthi , Anil Nigam & A. K. Kanojia paperino.5/8 .
6. Photo copy of payment voucher dated 8-2-2000 paper no . 5/9 .
7. Photo copy ofpayment of officiating ofvarious persons special allowance paper no . 5/10 to 5/18.
8. Photo copy of memorandum relating to P. K. Tewari dated 8-1-2001 paper no. 5/19.
Workers Sri Madhukar Pandey and A. K. Sharma and their representative Sri P. N. Shukla, Secretary, Union Bank of India Staff Association did not appear on 27-2-2003, 27-3-2003, 24-4-2003, 25-6-2003 . Therefore case was orderedto proceed ex- party against them .
The O. P. has filed affidavit of Chief Manager, Sri Ganga Ram, Regional Office , Kanpur.
Since workmen did not turned up even on 8-9-2003.Heardthe representative ofthe management alone .
The question is whether the AGM, Union Bank of India, Kanpur has deprived Madhukar Pandey & A. K. Sharma from special allowance of computer operator from April 1999 to date
According to the worker's own documents paper no. 5/3 i.e. 10.1 and 10.2 following provisions are made;
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] 10.1 Higher Assigment of all duties in clerical cadre ontemporarybasis will be made on branchwise simple seniority.
10.2 Vacancies attracting Special Allowances , occuring on temporary basis even for a single day shall be filled in on the basis of simple seniority of the employee working at the branch. If during the period of temporary assignment , a senior employee who was earlier not available for performing that duty , subsequently becomes available for such duties, such senior employee will be assigned the duties and the junior employee will cease to perform suchtemporary duties .
According to the said documents vacancies attracting special allowance occuring on temporary basis even for a single day has to be filled on the basis of simple seniority of the employees working at the branch .
Admittedly according to the worker there were six posts of computer operatory at the service brach ofKanpur Union Bank of India . Madhukar Pandey & A.K. Sharma were not posted at service branch Kanpur. They claimed their seniority at the station . The question is that whether the senior clerk of service branch of Union Bank of India should be given special allowance on account of computer operator and data feeding are clerks of other branches/ office should be allowed computer operation and data feeding. It is noteworthy Sri Gangaram Chief Manager has stated on oath that during the period for which the special allowance has been demanded, the workers Sri A.K. Sharma &Madhukar Pandey were posted in the Regional Office . The rules do not provide that other persons posted out side from the branch shouldbe allowed or should be posted inthebranch office just for receiving special allowance but itlaid down that simple senior employee working at the particular branch is entitled to the special allowance. The workers appeared to be posted at R. O. , Kanpur they can carry out the work of computer operation and data entry on the Service Branch unless they establish that they actually worked on computer and performed the duties related to computer in service branch, Kanpur .
Inthe circumstances why they instal their claim ? The seniority at station has not to be looked into in the present case . But a simple seniority at branch has to be looked into for providing special allowance , if such senior clerks is interested with the job of Computer Operatory or data entry etc. Since the workman has no entitlement of special allowance and therefore there is no question of deprivingMadhukar Pandey & A. K. Sharma in respect of special allowance meant for those who actually carried out data entry or computer operator in the service branch , Kanpur. The worker's association has failed to establish the right of the above 2 workmen for special allowance , therefore there was no occasion for these 2 workers to claim special allowance . The issue referred to the court is therefore in affirmative and workmen Madhukar Pandey and A. K. Sharma are not entitled for special allowance as indicated in the annexure attached to the statement of claim .
9-9-2003
SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer 6787 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11, 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2938.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 288/2001) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल. - 12012/168/99- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L- 12012/ 168/99 /IR(B -II) dated 11-11-1999 has earlier ' referred this industrial dispute to Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal for adjudication . The Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal has taken the same on its file as I.D. No. 295/99 and after the constitution of this Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court , the said industrial dispute was transferred to this Tribunal and after getting the same, it was numbered as I.D.No. 288/2001 . The dispute referred in the Schedule by the Govt. is hereunder -
सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 17th September, 2003
"Whether the demand of the Indian Bank Employees Union for empanelment of Shri I. Susai Xavier as temporaty sub - staff is justified ? If not what relief is he entitled to?"
S.O. 2938. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 288/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 15-09-2003 .
2. After numbering the industrial dispute , this Court has issued notices to both parties . Both parties have entered into through their authorised representative and advocates respectively. Both sides have filed statements. No witness has been examined on either side . Documents were marked on their side as Ex . W 1 to W 12 and M I to M4 respectively.
[No. L- 12012/ 168/ 1999- IR(B - II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
3. The contention of the Petitioner Union in the Claim Statement is briefly as follows :---
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Tuesday , the 26th August , 2003
PRESENT : K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 288/2001 (Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal I.D. No. 295/99)
(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofSub -section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Indian Bank and their workmen )
BETWEEN :
: I Party/Claimant
The General Secretary, Indian Bank Employees Union
AND
: II Party/Management
The General Manager, Indian Bank, Zonal Office , Chennai .
APPEARANCE :
For the Claimant
The concerned workman Sri I. Susai Xavier , S /o Sri Innasiraj was engaged as temporary sub - staff at the Ramaswamy Raja Nagar branch of the Respondent/Bank on 2-1-1982 and he was engaged for a total period of 103 days upto 26-12-1984 . Between the management and their workmen, there was a subsisting settlement entered into and as per the terms of the settlement any temporary employeewho has put in 90 days of temporary employment in sub - staff cadre between the period 01-01-1982 to 31-12-1989 has to be included in the empanelment of temporary employees list. In the meantime, the above said Sri I. Susai Xavier was also asked to appear for an interview by the Respondent Zonal Office at Trichy . The said Sri I. Susai Xavier appeared for the said interview on 10-6-1994, but he has not been selected . Subsequently , the management called for particulars for empanelment of employees to the panel of temporary employee. Further, theManager of Ramaswamy Raja Nagar branch has also recommended the name of Sri . Susai Xavier to be included in the panel of temporary employee . Even in spite of all these, the Respondent has not included the name of Sri I. Susai Xavier in the temporary panel . Hence , the Petitioner prays for an Award in his favour .
: Mr. K.J. Arunachalam, Authorised Representative
4. In the Counter Statement, the Respondent/ Indian Bank management has contended as follows :-
For the Management
Though the said Sri I. Susai Xavier has worked in the Respondent/Bank branch at Ramaswamy Raja Nagar for : Ms. Aiyar & Dolia , Sri N. Krishnakumar, Advocates 6788
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]
7. In this case , the admitted facts are- i) that Sri I. Susai Xavier was engaged as temporary sub -staff of the Respondent/Bank branch at Ramaswamy Raja Nagar from 2-1-82; ii) the concerned employee has worked for 103 days from 2-1-82 to 26-12-84; iii) there was a settlement entered into between the Petitioner Union and the Respondent/ Bank on 6-7-92 with regard to empanelment oftemporary sub-staff, who had worked for 90 days and more between the period 01-01-82 and 31-12-1989; and iv) consequentto that agreement, the Respondent/Bank effected a notice on 20-12-92 and sought applications from all eligible candidates for empanelment as temporary sub - staff.
8. In this case, on behalf of the Petitioner, it is contendedthat though the temporaty employee Sri I. Susai Xavier has fulfilled the norms fixed by the Respondent/ Bank as per the Bipartite Settlement with regard to the educational qualification and other things and the Respondent/Bank's Branch Manager of Ramaswamy Raja Nagarhas also recommended the name of Sri I. Susai Xavier and asked for permission to empanel as temporary sub- staff, the Respondent/Bank without any rhyne or reason has not selected him for the empanelment of temporary sub-staff list .
103 days from 2-1-82 to 31-12-84 , he was not available for empanelment after that period i ,e. he has stopped from coming to the bank as a Casual Labourer . This dispute was raised only in the year 1998 without any reasonable explanation for the inordinate delay, hence the claim ofthe Petitioner deserves to be dismissed. Subsequently, the Bipartite Settlement was entered into between the management and the workman on 6-7-92 for empanelment oftemporary sub- staff. The said settlement was done as a one-time measure and it was entered into for a specific purposeand specific period oftime and only if the persons are found suitable for selection, their names would be empanelled in the list. In the case of the concerned workman Sri I. Susai Xavier, as he was not found suitable for the post, his claim was rejected. Further , the Respondent/Bank Branch Manager has issued a notice on 27-9-99 asking the concerned employee as to why his name should not be dropped from the panel for the reason of his long absence and the concerned employee Sri I. Susai Xavier has not availed of this opportunity and he did not give any valid reply. Further in the settlement, both the parties have agreed that mere calling the candidates for interview will not vest anyright in them to be selected . Hence , the said Sri I. Susai Xavieris not entitled to any relief much less the relief he has asked to include his name in the temporary panel . Therefore, the Respondent/Management prays that his claim may be dismissed with costs.
5. Again, in the rejoinder statement , the Petitioner Union has contended that it is not true to say that Sri I. Susai Xavier was not available for engagement after 31-12- 1984. But on the other hand, it was the Respondent/Bank , who did not provide any employment to the concerned employee. It is also evident from the letter addressed by the Ramaswamy Raja Nagar Branch Manager to the Regional Manager, Triunelveli, wherein he has stated that the Bank could not provide employment to the concerned workman. Even assuming for an agrument sake that there is a delay in applying for the temporary post , since the Limitation Act is not applicable to Industrial Disputes , the Respondent cannot contend that it is barred by limitation . It is false to allege that Sri I. Susai Xavier was not found fit for the post and this contention was raised to preudice the mind of this Court and no notice was sent to the concerned employee as alleged by the Respondent. Again, it is false to allege that the concerned employee was not interested in employment and abandoned the job . Hence , the Petitioner Union prays that new claim is to be allowed.
6. In these cicumstances , the points to be decided in this case are as follows:-
10. But, on the other hand, it is contended onbehalf of the Respondent/Bank that permission to prepare empanelment of temporary employees list was granted by the Government as a one - time measure and the Settlement was entered into between the Petitioner Union and the Respondent/Bank for a specific purpose and for a specific period of time and further only if persons are found suitable for selection, their names would be empanelment in the list. In this case, though Sri I. Susai Xavier was attended the interview, since he was not found suitable for the selection for being kept in the panel and since the casual employee, Sri I. Susai Xavier was not available for casual/ temporary engagement after 31-12-1984 , his name was not included in the panel for temporary sub -staff. Further, Sri I. Susai Xavier was not interested in employment of sub - staff cadre after 1944 he was not engaged by the bank and only in 1998 he has raised this dispute with an inordianate delay and without any reasonable explanation for the delay and hence , the casual employee Sri I. Suasi Xavier is not entitled to any relief. Further, on the side of the Respondent/Management documents namely Government of India instructions dated 30-9-78 and 16-8-90 were marked as Ex. M 1 and M 2 and the copy ofthe Settlement entered into between the Respondent/Bank and the Petitioner Union dated 6-7-92 was marked as Ex. M3 and the copy of the letter sent by Sri I. Susai Xavier to the Regional Manager of the Respondent/Bank was marked as Ex. M4.
(i) "whether the Petitioner Union's demand for empanelment of the concerned employee Sri I. Susai Xavier as temporary sub-staff is justified?"
(ii) " to what relief the concerned employee is entitled?"
11. But, again on the side of the petitioner, it is contended that the contention of the Respondent that the temporary employee deserted and abandoned his work under the Respondent/Bank is only an after-thought .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19 , 1925
6789 not suitable , he was not selected and therefore , the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief as claimed inthis dispute.
14. Though I find some force in the contention of the Respondent side , on consideration of the entire evidence and on hearing the arguments , I find there is no substance in this contention because , in my view, this stand of the Respondent was taken as an after thought , as the first instance , it was contended that there was a long delay in approaching the forum by the concerned employee , secondly, it was contended that the concerned employee has abandoned or relinquished his temporary post and now thirdly, they wants to contend that the concerned employee is not suitable for the post of temporary employee . But, I think , the Respondent/Man- agement has not established before this Tribunal as to how the concerned employee is not fit or suitable for the empanelment of his name in the temporary employees ' list . Therefore, on all grounds they have miserably failed to establish that the concerned employee is not suitable for keeping him in the panel of temporary sub - staff list . As such, I find the concerned employee in this industrial dispute Sri I. Susai Xavier's name should be included in the list of empanelment of temporary sub - staff by the Respondent/Indian Bank . for the above reasons , I find the issue in favour of the petitioner Union .
15. Point No. 2
There is no delay on the part of the temporary employee and even assuming for an argument sake that there is a delay, it will not affect the case of the concerned workman because Limitation Act is not applicable to Industrial Desputes Act , 1947 as held by Supreme Court in 1999 ( 1) LLJ 1260 in the case of AIЛАВ SINGH Vs. SIRHIND CO-OP. MANUFACTURING CUM PROCESSING SERVICE FACTORY LTD. and in 1999 II LLJ 482 in the case of MAHAVIR SINGHVs. U.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERS . But, on the other hand, it was the Respondent/Management who did not provide any employment to the concerned workman and it is evident from the Respondent/ Bank's Branch Manager at Ramaswamy Raja Nagar's letter dated 17-4-97 , the copy of which is marked as Ex. W7 and therefore , there is no desertion or abandonment of work by the concerned em- ployee as alleged by the Respondent/Management. for this , the petitioners' Union relied on the ruling of High Court of Madras in 1984 I WLR 58 in the case of HACKBRIDGE HEWITTIC & EASUNN LTD . Vs. PRE- SIDING OFFICER, FIRST ADDITIONAL LABOUR. COURT, MADRAS & ORS. and the ruling of Supreme Court in 1979 I LLJ 257 in the case of G. T. LAD & ORS Vs. CHEMICALS AND FIBRES OF INDIA , wherein it was stated that " abandonment must be total andunder such circiumstances, which clearly indicate that the workman wanted to snap the relationship of master and servant relationship and the service in question. A temporary failure to perform duty pertaining to the office in question may not suffice concept of the abandonment of service and there must be actual or imputed intention on the part of the workman to abandon or relinquish his service . " The next question to be decided in this case is to what relief the concerned employee is entitled ?
In view of my above findings , the name of the concerned workman in this industrial dispute Sri I. Susai Xavier should be included in the list of empanelment of temporary sub - staff of the II party/ Respondent Indian Bank. Ordered accordingly, Hence , this issue is answered infavour of the petitioner Union .
16. The reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 26th August , 2003. )
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined : -
Oneither side
None Documents Marked :- For the I Party/Claimant :-
Date
Ex. No.
Description
WI
19-01-83
12. On consideration of the above arguments of the parties , I find some force in the contention of the Petitioner . Though on the side of the Respondent it was contended that the concerned employee Sri I. Susai Xavier did not avail of the opportunity given by the bank by a registered notice dated 27-9-89 sent to him and asked him as to why his name should not be the dropped from the panel of temporary employees for the reason of his long absence , no proof of service or no copy of the alleged letter was produced before this Tribunal . Further, it is clear from Ex . W7 namely the copy of the letter sent by the Respondent/Bank Branch Manager to the Regional Manager, Indian Bank, Tirunelveli , that the bank has not engaged the workman during that period and the employee has not abandoned or relinquished the post as alleged by the Respondent.
13. Then again , on behalf of the Respondent/ Management , it is vehemently contended that mere call- ing of the employee for the interview will not confer any right on him for the selection as alleged by the Petitioner and only if the employee is found suitable, he will be selected and in this case , since the Committee Members of SelectionBoard have found the employee Sri I. Susai Xavier 2803 G1/03-21
Xerox copy of the letter issued by Respondent/ Bank Ramaswamy Raja Nagar branch to Employment Officer, Ramnad Dist.
W2 12-11-92 Xerox copy of the application submitted by concerned Work- man Sri I. Susai Xaviers for empanelment.
6790
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
W3 11-06-76 Xerox copy of the mark sheet of concerned workman .
W4 Nil
Xerox copy of the identity card of concerned workman issued by Employment Exchange W5 Nil
Xerox copy of the statment show- ing details of engagement of concerned workman and date & payment.
W6 25-05-94 Xerox copy of the letter issued by Respondent/Bank to Con- cerned workman calling for inter- view regarding Empanelment .
W7 17-04-97 Xerox copy of the letter sent by Branch Manager Ramaswamy Raja Nagar Branch to Regional Manager with regard to empanelment of concerned workman.
W8. 25-09-97 Xerox copy of the letter from petitioner Union to Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) raising Industrial dispute.
W9 24-11-98 Xerox copy of the reply given by Respondent/Bank to Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Chennai .
W10 13-02-99 Xerox copy of the letter from peti- tionerUnion to Respondent /Bank with regard to regularisation of Concerned workman.
W11 04-01-99 Xerox copy of the rejoined filed by petitioner Union before Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Chennai .
W12 13-02-99 Xerox copy of the letter from peti- tioner Union to Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) .
Forthe II Party/Management:-
Ex. No.
Date
Description
M1
30-09-78 Xerox copy of the letter from Ministry of Finance to All the Heads of Banks and financial institutions regarding Recruit- ment of sub staff in public sector banks.
M2
16-08-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Ministry of Finance to All the ChiefExecutives of Banks regard- ing Recruitment and absorption of temporary sub -staff in public sectorbanks .
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] M3 06-07-92 Xerox copy of the memorandum of settlement under section 12(3 ) entered into between the Respondent /Management and petitioner Union regarding per- sons engaged in leave vacancies ofsub -staff.
M4 27-02-97 Xerox copy of the letter submit- tedby the concerned workman to Regional Manager , Trichy regard- ing employment .
नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2939.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार विजया बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 81/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[फा.सं. एल.- 12012/131/92- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 17th September , 2003 S.O. 2939. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 81/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial . Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Vijaya Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 15-09-2003.
[F. No. L - 12012/ 131/ 92- IR(B -II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Monday, the 25th August, 2003
PRESENT : K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 81/2002 (In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between theManagement of Vijaya Bank and their wormen representedby Vijaya Bank Workers' Organisation) .
BETWEEN :
: I Party/Claimant The Joint Secretary, VijayaBank Workers' Organisation 6791 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
AND
: II Party/Management
The Assistant General Manager, Vijaya Bank, Chennai .
category of workmen [clerks promoted from subordinate staff cadre] is totally illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and the same amounts to unfair labour practice. Hence, they pray that an Award is to be passed in favour ofthem.
APPEARANCES :
For the Claimant
: Mr. S.D. Srinivasan, Authorised Representative
For the Management
: Mr. Dineshan , Sr.Manager, Authorised Representative.
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification No- L - 12012/ 131 /92/IR(B - II) dated 14-5-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication: -
4. Against this , the Respondent/Management in their Counter Statement has alleged that the claim of the petitioner is unjust and unsustainable. The Bipartite Settlement is applicable only in case oftransfer of a workman from higher CCA centre to lower CCA centre or from a CCA centre to a non -CCA centre , whereas , the Petitioner Organisation is attempted to enlarge the scope of the said clauseto a promotee for which there is no provision in the Bipartite Settlement . The object of the provision in the Bipartite Settlement is to give protection that too for a limited period 3/1 year, for a workman who has been transferred from a higher CCA centre to a lower CCA centre on the ground of marginal reduction in his salary, whereas in the case of promotion and posting, the workman was already fixed at higher scale of pay, due to promotion and therefore, there is no possibility of his pay being reduces. Hence the Petitioner cannot equate the routine transfer along with posting by a promotion . Therefore, the management prays that this dispute may be dismissed with costs.
"Whether the claim of the Vijaya Bank Workers' Organisation for payment/protection of City Compensatory Allowance ( CCA) to the workmen posted to non - CCA centre on their promotion in terms of Clause III of sub -clause 3 and 3 (b) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 17-9-1984 is just and legal ? If so, what relief is the disputant union entitled to?"
2. The said reference was taken on the file of this tribunal as I.D. No. 81/2002 and notices were issued to both sides and both sides were appeared through their Authorised Representatives and filed their respective statements . During the enquiry, no witness examined on both sides and only one document i.e. , extract of Bipartite Settlement was marked as Ex. W1.
3. The contention of the petitioner Workers ' Organisation is briefly as follows :-
5.Again in the rejoinder statement , the petitioner Organisation contended that the provisions of Bipartite Settlement on protection of CCA equally appplies to both the subordinate staff and clerical staff on promotion. The said provision equally applies to all the Award staff members- special assistants, clerks , subordinate staff and part-time sweepers . Hence , the denial of the provisions ofCCA on the pretext that subordinate staff on promotion as a clerk has got an increase in salary is totally based on wrong presumption and it is not in consonance with the provision of Bipartites Settlement. Further , a clerical staff on posting as a special assistant from higher CCA centre to a lower/non -CCA centre , the CCA is protected by the bank , hence, the contention of the bank management is totally illegal. Hence , the Petitioner union prays for an award intheir favour.
6. From the contentions of both sides , the points for determination raised are:-
(i) "whether the claim of the Petitioner Organisation for payment of CCA to workmen posted to non-CCA centre on their promotion in terms of Clause III of sub -clause 3 and 2 (b) of Bipartite Settlement is just and legal ?"
(ii) " To what relief the Petitioner is entitled to?"
7. Point No. 1 :-
The only dispute in this case is whether the promotee, subordinate staff of the Respondent/Bank who has been posted to a lower/non - CCA centre on his promotion is entitled to CCA as provided in the Bipartite The dispute relates to wrongful and illegal action of the management of the Respondent/bank in denyng the protection of CCA allowance to promotee subordinate staff, who have been transferred to lower/non -CCA centres on their promotion. Even though, the provisions of the industry level Bipartite Settlement entered into between the workmen and the management is mandatory on the part ofthe Respondent/Bank, with regard to the protection ofCCA in case of transfer of a workman from higher/lower CCA centre to lower/non - CCA centre , the Respondent/ Bank suddenly on 30-7-1991 by a communication had withdrawn the said benefit hitherto paid to the clerical staff promoted from sub- staff cadre . According to the union it is a total violation of Bipartite Settlement and therefore, aggrieved over the action of the Respondent/Management , the Respondent/Bank Workers ' Organisation has raised an industrial dispute before the conciliation officer and on its failure , the Government has referred the matter to this Tribunal for adjudication . The action of the Bank Management in denial of protection of CCA only to one 6792
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Settlement . It is an admitted fact that in terms of Clause III ofSub -clauses 3 and 2 (b) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 17-9-1984, an extract of which is marked as Ex . W1 , incase of transfer of workmen from higher CCA centre to a lower CCA centre or from the CCA centre to a non -CCA centre , they are entitled to the protection of CCA as received in the previous station.
contended that for a clerical staff on posting as Special Assistant from higher/lower CCA centre to lower/non-CCA centre, the CCA is protected by the bank . On the other hand, if a sub-staff employee is promoted and posted to a clerical post , his CCA is not protected by the bank on the ground that on promotion, he is getting more salary which is against the provisions of Bipartite Settlement.
In sub -clause (3 ) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 17-9-1984 , it is stated as follows :-
)
9. But , on the other hand , on behalf of the Respondent/Management , it is argued that the Bipartite Settlement protects only CCA on transfer and it is not mentioned anything about the promotee staff and therefore, the sub - staff who has been promoted to clerical cadre is not entitled to any protection of CCA and they are not entitled to get any protection under Bipartite Settlement .
"Aworkman transferred from a CCA centre to a non-CCA centre , the CCA which is being paid to him on the date of the transfer shall be protected by way of adjusting allowance' which will be withdrawn in the same manner as set out in clause (2) above. "
10. But , on consideration of the entire materials on record , I find that the arguments of the Respondent/ Management is not valid and I find that they wanted to take advantge of the non - mention of the word " promotion" intheBipartite Settlement . When a clerical staff on posting as a Special Assistant is entitled for protection of CCA, I think, why don't the sub - staff who has been posted as clerical staff is not entitledto the protection of CCA Further, I find very much force in the contention of the Petitioner/Vijaya Bank Workers ' Organisation that the said denial of protection of CCA by the Respondent/Bank management is not only illegal but also blantantly discriminatory among the Award Staff. Therefore , I find thatthe Respondent/Vijaya Bank is to protect CCA to all the subordinae staff members , who have been promoted to clerical cadre . As such, I find this point in favour of the Petitioner.
11. The next point to be considered is to what relief the Petitioner Union is entitled?
Inview of my findings above , I find the Petitioner/ Vijaya Bank Workers ' Organisation is entitled to the relief as prayed for . Ordered accordingly. The reference is answered accordingly. No Cost .
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th August, 2003.)
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
Witnesses Examined :-
: Nil Oneither side
The petitioner union contented the same protection of CCA is also extended to employees when they were promoted from lower category- subordinate staff to a clerical cadre and posted to a different place. But on the other hand, on behalf of the Respondent/Management, it is contended that though a workman, transferred from higher CCA centre to a lower or non -CCA centre, is entitled to the protection of CCA under Bipartite Settlement entered into between the management and the workmen, a promotee workman from a lower category to a clerical cadre is not entitled to a protection of CCA when he was transferred to aplace from a higher CCA centre to a lower/non -CCA centre and there is no specific provision in the Bipartite Settlement asalleged by the Petitioner and now the Petitioner/Workmen cannot enlarge the scope of the above said clause to a promotee . It is further contended on behalf of the Respondent/Management that the object of the Settlement dated 17-9-1984 is to give protection that too for a limited period 3/1 year for the workmen who were transferred from a higher CCA centre to a lower CCA centre or from a CCA centre to non-CCA centre , because on such occasion , there may be a marginal reduction in their salary and with a view to protection their interest from such decrease in their salary, the above clause was extended to the labour organisation. But, when the same workman was promoted and posted to a different place , his pay will be fixed at a higher scale of pay duty to promotion and there is no possibility of his pay being reduced or decreased and therefore, protecting his CCA will not raise at all. It is therefore, contended on behalf of the management that posting onpromotion is to be considered as a fresh posting and itcannot be equated with a routine transfer .
Documents Marked :-
ForI Party/Workman :-
Ex. No. Date
Description
W1 Nil Xerox copy of page 32 of IV Bipartite Settlement Dated 17-91984.
: Nil
For Party/
8. But, on the other hand, on behalf ofthe workmen, it is contended that the provision of Bipartite Settlement applies equally to all the Award Staff members i.e. special assistants, clerks , subordinate staff and part - time sweepers and therefore, the denial of the same on the pretext that the subordinate staff on promotion as clerk has got an increase of salary is totally based on wrong presumption and is against the provisions of Bipartite Settlement . It is further Management 6793 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर, 2003
Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :
"Whether the action of the management ofMumbai Port Trust, Mumbai in terminating the service of Shri Jaiprakash Singh, Clerk (OBL) by way of removal from service w.e.f. 29-6-1999 " is legal and justified? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to ? " का.आ. 2940.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मुम्बई पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/26 का 2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-31011/23/2000- आई. आर (एम ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 17th September, 2003
S.O. 2040.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 2/26) of 2001 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Mumbai , No. 2 as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Mumbai Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 17-9-2003.
[No. L- 31011/23/2000 -IR(M)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, MUMBAI
2. Workman Singh was appointed by the management Mumbai Port Trust as Clerk in the year 1980. Vide Claim Statement (Exhibit -8) Union averred that dueto mental illness ofwife and family members workman remained absent from duty during 1994 to 1996 and that he had explained the same to the management however despite that management issued him charge sheet dated 30-11-1996 on his absence . It is averred that because of the mental illness and the sickness of his family members he was constrained to remain absent however the Inquiry Officerwithout realizing the cause, not applying his mind holding the inquiry found him guilty by the report dated 25-3-1999. It is averred that the Inquiry Officer as per the charge sheet was to inquire on his unauthorised absence for558 days during the period from 13-1-1994 to 10-10-1996 however he travelled beyond the scope referring his findings ofabsence for the period 1997to 1999 also and therefore the findings are not based on documents and evidence consequently are biased. It is contended inquiry being not proper and the findings biased, be set aside directing the management to reinstate the workman in service .
PRESENT : S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT- 2/26 of 2001
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MUMBAI PORT TRUST
The Chairman , Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai -400 038 .
V/s.
THEIR WORKMEN
The Secretary, Tranposrt and Dock Workers Union , P.D' Mellow Bhawan, P.D' Mellow Road, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai -400 038 .
APPEARANCES :
: Mr. Umesh Nabar, Advocate
Forthe Employer
Forthe Workmen : Mr. S.R. Wagh , Advocate .
Mumbai , dated 8th August, 2003 .
3. Management resisted the claim ofUnion by filing Written Statement (Exhibit - 10 ) contending that remaining absent from duty , workman created obstacle in the smooth working of the trust amounting to misconduct therefore charge sheet was issued to him on 30-11-1996 under Regulation 3 ( 1A) ( ii ) of the MbPT Employees ( Conduct) Regulations 1976 and the MbPT Employees (Classification, Control and Appeal ) Regulations 1976. It is pleased that vide explanation workman had assured of improvement in future and that while participating in the inquiry he had reitered the same but in vain. It is contended giving sufficient opportunity and observing the principles of natural justice Inquiry Officer holding the inquiry recorded the findings on unauthorised absence by the report dated 25-3-1999 and based on the report of misconduct workman was removed from the service w.e.f. 29-6-1999 and that in appeal his removal was confirmed. It is contended that inquiry being fair and proper and findings based on record and evidence does not vitiate and therefore the union's claim being devoid of substance be dismissed with costs in limine.
AWARD PART-I
4. By Rejoinder (Exhibit- 11 ) Union reitereated the recitals in the Claim Statement denying the averments in the Written Statement .
5. On the basis ofthe pleadings issues were framed at (Exhibit- 13) however in the context of preliminary issues, both the parties did not lead oral evidence vide purshis The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its OrderNo. L-31011/23/2000 -IR (M) dated 2-2-2001 in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub - section (1 ) and Sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial 6794
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER II , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (Exhibit- 15/16). Union filed written submissions (Exhibit- 17) and the management (Exhibit - 18).
अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 738/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/227/95- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] - 6. On perusing the record and the written submissions and hearing the counsels , I record my findings onthe preliminary issues for the reasons stated below:
Issues
Findings
सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव
Yes
New Delhi , the 17th September, 2003 1. Whether the domestic inquiry conducted against the workman was as perthe principles of natural justice ?
No
2. Whether the findings of the Inquiry Officer are perverse ?
REASONS
S.O. 2941. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 738/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003.
[No. L- 12012/227/95 - IR(B- II)]
C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Monday, the 25th August , 2003
PRESENT : K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 738/2001
[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Indian Bank and their workman Smt .Mallika]
BETWEEN :
: I Party/ Claimant
The General Secretary, Indian Bank Employees Union
AND
: II Party /Management
The General Manager, IndianBank
APPEARANCE :
For the Claimant
7.Admittedlyas seen from the record workman Singh Participated in the inquiry in connection with the charge sheet dated30-11-1996 about his absenteeism for the period from 1994 to 1996. According to workman himself he remained absent due to mental illness of his wife and the sickness ofhis family members. The Inquiry Officer by his report dated 25-3-1999 found the workman committing misconduct by remaining unauthorisedly absent for 558 daysduring the period 13-1-1994 to 10-10-1996. Nothing to show that the inquiry vitiates on the ground of violation ofprinciples of natural justice and in the light of the tests laid down by Their Lordships of the Apex Court in case SurEnamel and Stamping Works V/s . their Workmen 1963 II LLJ SCC 367. On perusal the inquiry proceedings (Exhibit- 12) it is apparent that based on the documents and evidence findings on unauthorised absence from 13-1-1994 to 10-10-1996 are recorded by the Inquiry Officer. True it is in the report dated25-3-1999 Inquiry Officer made mention also on absence of workman from 30-1-1997 to 20-2-1999. It seems to show the tendency of workman to remain absent the same find place in report which has no relevance with findings recorded. It is seen from the record workman remained absent for 558 days without sanctioned leave which amounts to misconduct under Regulation -3 ( 1A)(ii ) ofthe MbPT Employees (Conduct ) Regulations 1976 and theMbPT Employees (Classification, Control and Appeal ) Regulations 1976 therefore the findings cannot said tobe perverse. Thus the inquiry being fair and proper and the findings not perverse , issues are answered accordingly and hence the order:
: Mr. K.J. Arunachalam, Authorised Representative ORDER
For the Management
: M/s. Aiyar andDolia .
Sri N. Krishnakumar, Advocates Thedomestic inquiry conducted against the workman was as per the principles of natural justice and the findings ofthe Inquiry Officer are not perverse.
AWARD
S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presding officer
नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर, 2003
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L- 12012/227/95 -B-II dated 17/19-10-2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-
का.आ. 2941.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संजद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
"Whether the claim of the Indian Bank Employees ' Union, Chennai for regularisation of the services of Smt .Malliga as permanent part -time sweeper by the 6795 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19 , 1925
management of Indian Bank is justified and legal ? If not what relief is the disputant concerned entitled to ?"
the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) , the Respondent has not appointed any person subsequently. It islegally settled that no regularisation can be made if the individual entry is totally illegal and inflagrant disregard to rules and regulations . Hence , they pray that this petition should be dismissed.
2. The said reference was taken up on the file ofthis Tribunal as I.D. No. 738/2001 and notices were issued to both sides . The I Party/Union has filed Claim Statement and the II Party/Management has filed their Counter Statement . After that , the I Party alone has filed a rejoinder statement .
3. The case of the I Party/Union as stated in the Claim Statement is briefly as follows :-
5. Again the Petitioner in the rejoinder statement has contended that the Respondent/ Management after having engaged the services of the sweeper Smt . Malliga cannot be allowed to contend that the engagement of the sweeper was not appointed by the competent authority and she is not entitled to any regularisation . Sweepress post at the Extension Counter at Pondicherry University is a permanent post and this post was not filled in with a permanent employee within the stipulated period . The action of the Respondent/Management amounts to unfair labour practice as laid down in the Schedule of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is false to allege that the Bipartite Settlement was entered into on 28-7-93 was only on the direction of the Government of India. Further, Section 3 of the Employment Exchange Compulsory Notification of Vacancies Act clearly lays down that for filling up vacancies in menial jobs like sweepers and scavengers , such vacancies shall not be notified to Employment Exchange and such posts need not be sponsored through Employment Exchange . It is false to contend that Smt . Malliga was appointed as temporary / casual appointment and as a stop - gap measure . On the other hand, she was appointed only against the permanent vacancy and she worked more than 240 days in each calendar year. Hence, the Petitioner prays that an Award should be passed in their favour.
6. In the circumstances , the points to be decided in this case are as follows :-
(i) " whether the claim of the Petitioner Union for regularisation of the Sweeper Smt. Malliga as permanent part - time sweeper by the management of Indian Bank is just and legal ? "
Smt .Malliga has been engaged asa casual/temporary sweeper at the Extension Counter of the Respondent/Bank at Pondicherry University Extension Counter from its inception i.e. 4-6-1992 against a permanent vacancy ofpart- time sweeper . She was working along with another casual sweeper Smt . Bagyalakshmi . Subsequently, the said extension counter then attached to Jawaharlal Nehru Street Branch at Pondicherry from 01-10-93 and Smt . Bagyalakshmi was absorbed in the resignation vacancy of her Mother Smt . Thanjammal , who worked as part - time sweeper in Kottukuppam branch. As per Clause 20.7 and 20.8 of Bipartite Settlement entered into between the Bank Employees and the Management , it is mentioned that when any permanent vacancy arise, that vacancy should be filled up only by calling for panel of employees and preference has to be given for the casual/temporary employees who have worked in the vacancy. Further, the Settlement stipulates that within six months from the date of the vacancy, it has to be filled up by calling for panels . Therefore , the Respondent/Bank's University Extension Counter's permanent vacancy of Sweeper should have to filled among the part - time sweeper by absorbing the senior- most temporary employee empanelled by the Respondent/ Bank . Therefore, Smt . Malliga is entitled to the relief as permanent absorption in the Respondent/Bank as a permanent part - time sweeper with all monetary benefits , continuity of service and other all attendant benefits .
(ii) to what relief, the disputant is entitled to ?"
7. Point No. 1 :-
Inthis case, it is admitted that Smt . Malliga, sweeper was engaged as a temporary sweeper at the Extension Counter ofPondicherry University of the respondent Bank from 4-6-1992 . On behalf of the Petitioner , it is contended that she has been engaged as sweeper against permanent vacancy of sweeper's post in that unit. It is the further contention of the Petitioner that according to Bipartite Settlement entered into between the workmen and the management of Indian Bank on 28-7-1993 , a copy ofwhich ismarked as W6 /M3 , the services of Smt . Malliga should have been regularised into a permanent sweeper of the Respondent/Bank . The Petitioner further contended that as per the clause of Settlement, any permanent vacancy in 4. Against this , the Respondent in their Counter Statement has alleged that Smt . Malliga was not engaged astemporary sweeper against permanent vacancy ofpart- time sweeper at the University Extension Counter, but she was engaged as a casual /daily wager and that too without any authorisation from the Zonal Office. Therefore , her initial engagement itself was illegal , unauthorised and in disregard of rules . She was intermittently engaged for 227 days and therefore , the question of continuous engagement of 240 days will not arise. Since she was not appointed by the Competent Authority, the provision of Bipartite Settlement has no relevance for this case . The said settlement is in accordance with the direction of Government of India that the recruitment of sub- staff cadre should be made through Employment Exchange only. Because the Petitioner Union has raised the dispute before 6796
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
Smt . Malliga was made as casual part - time sweeper and employment of casual labour to meet the exigencies and therefore, she cannot be asked for any regularisation and it should also not be done .
thepost of sweeper should be filled within six months from thedate of arising of that vacancy. But, in this case, though the part-time sweeper vacancy at the University Extension Counter arose in the year 1992, it was not filled up till now aslaiddown in the Settlement. It is argued on behalf ofthe Petitioner that under Ex. W4, a copy of which is marked through the Petitioner, though the Zonal Office of the Respondent/Bank at Pondicherry in its letter to the Head Officehas recommended regularisation of the services of Smt . Malliga, the Respondent/Bank has not done anything to that effect . Therefore , it is prayed that the claim ofthe Petitioner is to be allowed.
!
9. On behalf of the Petitoner Union, it is argued that the Government circulars mentioned by the Respondent as guidelines have no relevance for this dispute and they deal about the vacancies of sub -staff and not covered with Sweepers/ Scavengers posts . Further, item 10 of Schedule V of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 categorically states that to employ workmen as casuals for years with the object ofdepriving them of the status of permanent workmen is anunfair labour practice. In this case , Sint . Malliga was employed as a temporary part -time sweeper from 1992 onwards and even though , the Zonal Office had recommended for her regularisation, the Respondent/Bank has not done the same on the ground that it is against the Government circulars and instructions given to them. On the other hand, under section 2(2 ) ( i ) (3 ) of Employment Exchange ( Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959, vacancy of menial job like sweeper need not be notified and no management is obligation to approach the Employment Exchange for sponsoring the candidates for engagement of sweeper employees . Further , it is argued that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1987 (I) LLJ 545 in the case of U.O.I. & OTHERS Vs. N. HARGOPAL AND OTHERS and also in 1997 ILLJ 567 in the case of EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT, MALKAPATNAM, AP Vs. K. B. N. VISWESHWARA RAO AND ORS . has held that "forjobs ofmenial nature, the provisions of the Act should notbe insisted upon " and in 1992 I LLJ 651 D. VENKATA RAO & OTHERS VS. PRINCIPAL, D.A. GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC , ONGOLE & ANOTHER, the High Court ofAndhra Pradesh has held that "from section 3 of the Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies)Act, 1959, it is quite manifest that the authority cannot insist upon the candidates being sponsored by the Employment Exchange and in that case, it is not disputed that the Government by virtue ofG.O. insisted for even appointment ofunskilledworkers, the candidates will have to be sponsored by Employment Exchange that itwill be running count to the Act itself" and it was held that such insistence is not in consonance with the provisions of the Act and also struck down the same and therefore, in this case , the Respondent/Management want only has not regularised the services of Smt . Malliga and it is quite unfair labour practice on the part of the Respondent.
8. But, on the other hand , on behalf of the Respondent/Management it is contended that Smt. Malliga was engaged as a casual/ daily wager and that too without any authorisation from the Zonal Office, therefore , her engagement itself is illegal , unauthorised and utter disregard to the rules and regulations . It is further contended on behalf of the Respondent that the Government of India through its circulars and instructions havedirected the Respondent/Bank and other nationalised banks that the banks should ensure that recruitment in sub-staff cadre irrespective of nature and duration of vacancy should be made through Employment Exchange and they have also marked Ex . M1 , a copy of instructions givenby the Government of India dated 30-9-78 and also their circular issued to subordinate bank branches , the copy ofwhich is marked as Ex . M2. It is the further contention of theRespondent that in the case of HIMANSHU KUMAR VIDYARTHI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS 1997 LAB I.C. 2075, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that 'labour deployed on daily wages on need basis work is not an appointment for any post and therefore, their retrenchment does not attract the definition ofSection 25F ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Further, it is argued that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1992 II LLJ452 DELHI DEVELOPMENT HORTICULTURE EMPLOYEES ' UNION VS. DELHI ADMINISTRATION , DELHI & ORS . has expressed in strong words that " it had become a common practice to ignore the Employment Exchange and the persons registered in Employment Exchange and to employ or get employed directly those who are either not registered with Employment Exchange or who though registered are lower in the long awaiting list in the Employment Register " . It is further argued that theApex Court has criticised such employment is sought and given directly for various illegal considerations including money It is further argued that thus the public interest is jeopardised on both counts . It is also argued that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1997 II LLJ 856 has held that"recruitment cannot be made if initial entry is totally illegal and in blatant disregard of rules and regulations and back door method ofentry in public services should be avoided. " On behalf of the Respondent/Management , it is further argued that in this case the appointment of
10. I find some force in the contention of the Petitoner Union, because the Respondent/Bank from 1992 onwards having engaged the services of Smt. Malliga for the post ofpart-time sweeper and it is also clear that the post ofpart time Sweeper in the Pondicherry University Extension Counter is a permanent post and against the rules and regulations and also the provisions of Bipartite Settlement , 6797 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
W 5 Nil
: Xerox copy of the pass book for S.B. A/c . No. 1203 of Smt . Malliga .
W6 28-07-93 : Xerox copy of the settlement under Section 18 ( 1 ) Entered into between Indian Bank Management and Federation of Indian Bank Employees Union regarding Filling up of part- timesweeper.
W 7 18-08-93 : Xerox copy of the circular issued by Personnel Dept. To All Regional Managers/Zonal Managers of Indian Bank With regard to career path to part- time sweeper.
W 8 12-01-94
the Respondent/Bank has not employed any person for the post of Sweeper on permanent basis in that branch , cannot now contend that the engagement of the said Smt. Malliga is not proper and she was not appointed by the competent authority and therefore , she cannot claim for any regularisation . By keeping the permanent post vacant for such a long period and now they wanted to take advantage that Smt . Malliga has been appointed temporarily as a casual /daily wager and contend that her appointment is unauthorised and I find much force in the contention of the Petitioner. Therefore , I come to the conclusion that the services of Smt . Malliga are to be regularised as permanent part -time sweeper from the date ofpassing of this Award in the Respondent Indian Bank. As such , I find this point in affirmative.
: Xerox copy of the letter from Indian Bank Employees Union to Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) raising industrial dispute .
11. Then the only point to be decided in this case is to what relief, the disputant entitled to?
W9 10-04-95
Inview of my findings in Point No. 1, this point isto be answered in favour of the disputant .
: Xerox copy of the letter from Indian Bank Employees Union to Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) raising industrial dispute.
Forthe II Party/Management: -
Ex. No. Date
Description
M1 30-09-78
12. In view of the above , the II Party /Indian Bank management is directed to regularise the services of Smt. Malliga, the workman concerned in this industrial dispute, aspermanent part - time sweeper in the Respondent/Bank with effect from the date of passing of this Award . The reference is answered accordingly.
Xerox copy of the letter from Ministry ofFinance to All the Heads ofBanks and financial institutions regarding Recruitment of sub staff in public sector banks .
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th August, 2003. )
M2 18-11-80
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer
Witnesses Examined : -
Forthe I Party/Claimant : WW1 Sri E. Arunachalam
Xerox copy of the circular issuedby Personnel Deptt. To All Regional/ Zonal/AreaManagers of Indian Bank regarding Norms relating to wages of part-time sweepers .
Forthe II Party/ : None
M3 28-07-93
Management
Documents Marked: -
Forthe I Party/Claimant: -
Ex. No. Date : Description
Xerox copy of the settlement under Section 18 ( 1 ) Entered into between Indian Bank Management and Federation of Indian Bank Employees Union regarding Filling up of part- time sweeper .
WI 30-01-93
M4 26-06-96
: Xerox copy of the letter issued by Central Office of Respondent/Bank to all the Zonal Managers regarding Wages to part -time sweepers .
W2 Nil
Xerox copy of the letter issued by Reserve Bank of India to the Chairman, Indian Bank regarding Achievement of capital adequacy ratio of 8 per cent .
: Xerox copy of the salary details in respect of Smt . Malliga.
M5 04-03-83
W3 31-12-93 : Xerox copy of service certificate issued to Smt . Malliga by Respondent/Bank branch at Kottakuppam.
Xerox copy of the circular issuedby Personnel Deptt . To all branches of Indian Bank regarding engagement ofpersons during leave vacancies of substaff.
W4 24-03-97
M6 16-08-90
: Xerox copy of the letter addressed to Assistant General Manager, Central Office, Chennai regarding
Xerox copy of the letter from Ministry of Finance to All the Chief Execu- tives ofBanks regarding Recruitment and absorption of temporary sub- staff in public sector banks .
Regularisation/ appointment of part- time sweepers .
2803 G1/ 03-22 6798
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
AWARD
नई दिल्ली. 19 सितम्बर, 2003
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide NotificationOrder No. L- 12012/359/2001 - IR(B- I) dated 26- 11-2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:---
का. आ. 2942.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार फेडरेल बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के 'बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. 749/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-09-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"Whether the action of the management of Federal Bank Ltd. in dismissing the service of Sri T. Shanmugavelu from the post of Typist Cum Clerk w.e.f. 8-5-2000 is justified? If not, what relief the concerned employee is entitled ?"
[सं. एल.- 12012/359/2001- आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ]
अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 19th September , 2003
2. The said reference was taken on the file of this Tribunal as I.D. No. 749/2001 and notices were issued to both sides and both sides entered through their counsel and filed their statements . No oral evidence has been let in on either side . The II Party/Management has filed 38 documents andthey were marked as Ex.M1 to M38 and the Petitioner/Workman has not filed any document .
3. The Petitioner/Workman Sri T. Shanmugavely in his Claim Statement has stated as follows :-
S.O. 2942. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( ID . No. 749/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial . Tribunal/ Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Federal Bank Ltd. and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 18-9-2003.
[No. L- 12012/359/2001 - IR(B- 1) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Thursday, the 4th September , 2003
PRESENT : K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 749/2001
(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofSub - section ( 1) and Sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of M/ s . Federal Bank Ltd. Kerala and theirworkman Sri T. Shanmugavelu .)
BETWEEN:
Sri T. Shanmugavelu
: I Party/Workman
AND
II Party/Management
On 25-3-1975 he was appointed as an office boy in the respondent bank and subsequently appointed as: bankman and promoted as a Clerk on 13-4-77 and he wa transferred to Tuticorin on 10-10-77 . Since he relinquishe his membership in AIBEA, he was sidelined and victimise both by the Union and Management . Further the staff an management have treated the Petitioner in a hostile manneı TheRespondent Management has issued a charge memo dated 8-6-99, 16-6-99 , 18-6-99 and 22-9-99 on the groun that he left the office early without permission and returned late after lunch break, tried to forcibly snatch a newspape from another staff ofthe branch , refused to sign the offic order issued to him and not entering the vouchers relatiną to bills in the limit register properly and not obeying direction ofthe superiors . These charges were issued only to victimise the petitioner and these charges clerly fall under the category of Schedule 5 of Industrial Disputes Act . As the petitioner was frustrated due to discriminatory treatment, he also responded at times with his frustration. For the above mentioned charges , an enquiry was conducted in violation of principles of natural justice. In the enquiry, the Enquiry Officer has refused to permit the petitioner to have defence assistant or an advocate . Even the documents which the petitioner requested were not produced in the enquiry. The petitioner was placed under suspension and he was not paid subsistence allowance . Forthese reasons , he prays an Award is to be passed in his favour.
The Assistant General Manager , M/s. Federal bank Ltd. , Alwaye , Kerala.
APPEARANCE:
For the Workman
: M/s . P.V.S. Giridhar, Advocates
For the Management
: M/ s . Sreekrishnan Associates Advocates
4. The Respondent in thier Counter Statement contended that domestic enquiry was conducted in a fair and proper manner and petitioner was afforded a full and fair opportunity to defend himself. The service record of the petitioner in the bank was far from satisfactory . The charge memos were issued for the acts of misconduct 6799 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
committed by the petitioner . The enquiry officer has conducted the domestic enquiry as per rules and in accordance with the principles of natural justice and full opportunity was given to the petitioner to defend himself and a copy of the finding was also sent to the petitioner. Only after consideration of all these relevant factors, the Disciplinary Authority has imposed the punishment of dismissal . The petitioner alone has declined to have the assistance of any defence representative. The petitioner was paid subsistence allowance as per provisions . Hence , the Respondent prays that the claim may be rejected.
8. On behalf of the Petitioner, though he has questioned the enquiry proceedings in the Claim Statement, he has not let in any evidence either oral or documentary to dispute the enquiry proceedings . On behalf of the Petitioner/Workman , it is argued that no doubt that the Petitioner has done certain minor mistakes and they are not so serious to impose the punishment of dismissal and further these mistakes had occurred only at the time when the Petitioner's salary was not paid fully and while his request for festival advance was refused for no fault of his act and therefore, the Petitioner was frustrated due to discriminatory treatment and he also responded his frustration. It is further argued that though such acts cannot at all be appreciated, yet , it cannot be said that he should be awarded with the punishment of dismissal from service.
9. On the other hand, it is argued on behalf of the Respondent that there were serious misconducts on the part of the Petitioner Sri T. Shanmugavelu during the working hours and during the course of his employment and these acts of Petitioner/Workman cannot be said as minor and it is well settled by the Supreme Court and other High Courts in their judgements that the act or conduct of a servant may amount to misconduct-
(i) ifthe act or conduct is prejudicial or likely to be prejudicial to the interest of the master or to the reputation of his master ;
5. Again , in the additional claim statement, the petitioner has alleged that without examining the authors ofthe documents, the Enquiry Officer has relied upon the documents . The non- examination of authors of documents which were relied on has caused great prejudice on the part of the petitioner. The Enquiry Officer has wrongly placed the onus on the petitioner and has come to a wrong conclusion . The findings ofthe Enquiry Officer are perverse and unsustainable in law. The respondent imposed five penalties in respect of charges that were subject matter of enquiry which were against law. Further the penalty of dismissal is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the charges . Further, the petitioner was not put on notice with regard to the past conduct which was taken note of by the DisciplinaryAuthority in imposing the punishment . Hence, he prays that order of Disciplinary Authority is to be set aside .
(ii) if the act or conduct is inconsistent or incompatible with due or peaceful discharge of hisduty to his master ;
6. In the above circumstances , the points to be decided in this case are-
(iii) ifthe act or conduct of a servant makes it unsafe for the employer to retain him in service ;
(iv) ifthe act or conduct of the servant is so grossly immoral that all reasonable men will say that the employee cannot be trusted ;
(1) "Whether the action of the management ofM/s . Federal Bank Ltd. in dismissing the services of Sri T. Shanmugavelu from the post of Typist- cum-Clerk with effect from 8-5-2000 is justified ?"
(ii) " To what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? "
(v) if the act or conduct of the employee is such that the master cannot rely on the faithfulness ofthe employee ;
7. Point No. 1
(vi) if the act or conduct of an employee is such as to open before him temptations for not discharging his duties properly ;
(vii) if the servant is abusive or if he distrubs the peace at the place of his employment;
(viii ) if he is insulting and insubordinate to such a degree as to be incompatible with the continuance ofthe relation of master and servant;
(ix) if the servant is habitually negligent in respect ofthe duties for which he is engaged ; and
(x) if the neglect of the servant , though isolated, tends to cause serious consequences .
Inthis case , the employee is habitually negligence in respect of his duties for which he is engaged and he often In this case , the charges against the Petitioner/ Workman Sri T. Shanmugavelu found by the Respondent/ Management to have been proved in the domestic enquiry are that the workman was in the habit reporting duty late and leaving office early without permissions and that he used to often leave the office early without completing the work assigned to him and picked up quarrel with co- employees thereby disturbing the work of other members and created disorderly scene in the branch and he refused to sign the office orders and abused his superior officers and thereby disturbing peace of the place and so on. Therefore , the management after following the procedure has dismissed the employee with effect from 8-5-2000 . The Respondent/Management has marked 38 documents as Ex . M1 to M38 with regard to enquiry proceedings and final orders passed in that case.
6800
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11,2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART I-SEC . 3 ( ii)] insults the co -employee and also quarrlled with them and hisinsubordination is of such a degree to be incompatible with the continuance of relationship of master and servant and therefore , it cannot be said that this punishment of dismissal is so harsh or abnormal . It is further argued that charges framed against the employee were established at the domestic enquiry and the Enquiry Officer has conducted the domestic enquiry as per the rules and in accordance with the principles of natural justice and therefore , this Tribunal cannot interfere with regard to the quantum of punishment imposed on the Petitioner by the employer . Further, on the side of the Respondent reliance are placed on the reported cases of the following decisions :-
( i) 1960 LLJ 167 SHARDAPRASAD ONKARPRASAD TIWARI & OTHERS Vs. CENTRAL RAILWAY;
( ii) 1992 I LLJ 825 PUNJAB FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS. UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & OTHERS.
(iii) AIR 1965 SC917-M/S. HIND CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING CO . LTD : VS. THEIR WORKMEN
punishment except that of termination of service. 1999 I LLJ 1124 deals with principles of proportionality in regard to the punishment in that case . The punishment of dismissal was imposed in a departmental enquiry which was also upheld on appeal . The Tribunal converting into stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect on the ground that it was irrational. While dealing with this finding, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that as principle of proportionality can be invoked regarding punishment only in a case where the punishment is totally irrational in the sense that it is totally outrageous defiance of logic or moral standards and I find , such is not the case on hand. The other case 1999 II LLJ 976 , in that case , while dealing with the case , the high Court upholding the Award order of dismissal of the Labour Court , but directed the employer to provide appointment in lower category as new entrant but the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that " one thing is to find that punishment is disproportionate to the indiscipline and to reduce the severity thereof. It is quite another to hold that the punishment was justified and yet to direct the employer to reemploy the delinquent employee and the High Court does not have the jurisdiction or power to do so on compassionate grounds or otherwise. "
( iv) 1999 ILLJ 1124- STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS Vs. H. NAGARAJ;
(v) 1999 IILJ976-A.P.S.R.T.C. Vs. K. POCHAIAH AND ANOTHER
The learned counsel for the Respondent argued that in this case the charges against the concerned workman have been clearly proved and under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the punishment imposed is too harsh .
(vi ) AIR 1999 SC 1552-UP . STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & OTHERS Vs. A.K. PARUL
11. On the other hand, it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that the punishment given by the employer is disproportionate and they relied on the following decisions reported in-
(vii) AIR 2000 SC 1163-U.P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA AND OTHERS ;
(1) 2003 (2 ) LLN 874-STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD . Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, COIMBATORE & OTHERS (viii) 1989 ILLLJ 57- UNION OF INDIA VS. PARMA NANDA; AND
(ii) 1997 (4 ) LLN 214- SMT. SELVAMARY Vs. JAWAHAR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, NEYVELI AND OTHERS .
(x) 1995 IILLJ62-M/S MUKUND ENGG . WORK Vs. BANSI PURSHOTTAM
(iii) 1994 II LLN 181 - CHARLES Vs. FIRST ADDITIONAL LABOUR COURT, MADRAS AND ANOTHER;
(iv) 1996 I LLJ 982-RAM KISHAN VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ;
Wherein , ( 1 ) 1960 ILLJ 167 and (2) AIR 1965 SC 917 are related to cases prior to amendment of Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 11A was inserted in the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 to confer powers on the Adjudicators to re - appraise the evidences adduced in the domestic, enquiry and to grant proper relief to workmen and the said power the Tribunal did not possess earlier . Therefore , these two cases are not applicable to the present circumstances .
(v) 1997 I LLJ 698- THE MANAGEMENT OF ESWARAN AND SONS ENGINEERS (P) LTD . Vs. III ADDITIONAL LABOUR COURT, MADRAS AND ANOTHER.
10. 1992 II LLJ 825 deals with misconduct. In that case, it was alleged that the workman shouting abscene , abusive slogans and using filthy language against a lady ManagingDirector and it was held by the Punjab & Hayrana High Court that these acts does not warrant lenient
In the above cases , in the first case , where the High Court of Madras when considering the case of a similar nature held that " in the context of the facts of the case penalty ofdismissal was shockingly disproportionate. " In the second case , and ' Ayah' of a school discharged 6801 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
will be begging' In all these incidents , the Petitioner has disobeyed the orders of his superiors and the occurrences were taken serious note of and therefore after due enquiry , the employer has come to a conclusion that his service has to be terminated and therefore, they passed an order of dismissal.
13. But, on consideration of the above arguments and also the perusal of documents produced before this Court, I am of the considered opinion that in this case the punishment awarded in the circumstances shown before me to the employee is irrational and interests of justice require a much lesser punishment because the inflict of punishment ofdismissal cannot beside to be commensurate with the gravity of the offence shown before me . Though , the Respondent/Management has shown before this Tribunal that the delinquent employee has uttered words as mentioned above , I am of the view that in a banking establishment where there are large number of workers, it is quite natural for such occurrences like one in hand to happen between the employer and employee . The words uttered by the Petitioner must be looked into with the surrounding circumstances . In this case , it is pointed out to me that the Petitioner's salary was withheld for certain days in that month and his request for festival advance was negatived by the Manager and when the Petitioner asked about the same, the Manager has not given any proper reply and under such circumstances , the Petitioner retaliated by saying that " my children are starving , your childrenwillbe begging and so on ". Therefore , under these circumstances , the actual words used, duration and the surrounding circumstances will be taken not of and while doing so, I find the imposition of punishment of dismissal order on the Petitioner is shockingly disproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct.
from service without enquiry on the ground of loss of confidence for being hahitually negligent and irregular in her duties and insubordinate to her superiors and for unsatisfactory general conducts, the Labour Court ordered her reinstatement with full back wages . The Single Judge ofthe High Court of Madras in Writ Petition even though held that the alleged misconduct on the part ofthe appellant had not been proved but modified the Award of the Labour court and directed to pay compensation , but on appeal , the Division bench of the High Court of Madras has upheld the Award passed by the labour Court ofreinstatement but not the back wages . In the third case, the Madras High Court in a case of similar nature has held that " the court does through stress and strain the Petitioner had been undergoing at that time when the occurrence took place, but one thing is certain that something could have happenedmaking him to loose his balance which resulted in the volley of abuses being hurled against his superior officers . Though such an act of his cannot at all be appreciated yet , it cannot be stated that he should be dismissed from service , even considering his past misconducts which are after all trivial in nature. He had been under going the agony and anguish of being terminated from service and for the past 12 years and during this period, the incident in question could have been wiped out from the memory ofeveryone and in such circumstances, interests ofjustice require a much lesser punishment. " Inthis view of the matter, reinstatement of employee without back wages but continuity of service and other attendant benefits was ordered in this case. In thefourthjudgement, it was held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that " when abusive language is used by anybody against a superior, it must be understood in the environment in which the person is situated and the circumstances surrounding the event that led to the use of abusive language . No straight jacket formula could be evolved in adjudging whether the abusive language in the given circumstances would warrant dismissal from service. Each case has to be considered on its own facts."
14. Again it is argued on behalf of the Respondent that even the Petitioner's past conduct was not good. Only on consideration of all these things , the employer has imposed the punishment of dismissal . But on behalf on the Petitioner , it was argued that the past record being considered to the prejudice of the Petitioner /workman and therefore , there is a legal infirmity and it cannot be considered. Further, the Petitioner /Workman was not put innotice with regard to this discussion prior to the order of dismissal and therefore , this argument is not valid in law and they relied on a decision report in the case of THE MANAGEMENT OF ESWARAN AND SONS ENGINEERS ( P) LTD . Vs. III ADDITIONAL LABOUR COURT MADRAS AND ANOTHER reported in 1997 I LLJ 693 , wherein the High Court of Madras in a similar situation, has come to a conclusion that " it was a legal infirmity in the order ofdismissal as well as in the Award of Labour Court that past record of workman service was taken into account for the purpose of imposing extreme penalty ofdismissal without giving to the notice thereby. " In this case , no charge has been framed against 12. In this case, it is shown by the Respondent that the Petitioner on 24-03-1999 , 25-03-1999 and 21-8-1999 left the branch early without permission and without completing the works allotted to him . Similarly, on 9-6-99 the Petitioner returned to the branch after the lunch break at 3.20 pm , though he required to be present for duty at 2.30 pm and on 11-6-1999 , the Petitioner tried to forcibly snatch a newspaper from another staff of the branch one Sri Ilangovan and in that process , the Petitioner pushed Sri Ilangovan aside and he picked up quarrel with him disturbing the work of other members of staff. On 12-7-1999, the Petitioner refused to sign in the office order and reported the Manager (Administration ) . Similarly, in another incident, he shouted at the manager (Admn. ) and uttered the words my children are starving, your children 6802
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
the past conduct of the delinguent employee and no notice has been issued to him . Under such circumstances , I am not accepting the arguments of the learned counsel for the respondent .
15. Inview ofthe foregoing, 1 come to the conclusion that this issue is to be answered in favour of the Petitioner. As such , I hold that the action of the management of Federal Bank Ltd. in dismissing the services of Sri T. Shanmugavelu from the post of Typist- cum- Clerk with effect from 8-5-2000 is notjustified.
Point No. 2-
16. The next point to be considered in this case is to what relief the Petitioner/Workman Sri T. Shanmugavelu is entitled?
In view of my findings above , I feel that it would be better justice to order reinstatement of the Petitioner/ Workman Sri T. Shanmugavelu in the service of II Party/ Management ofM/s . Federal Bank Ltd. without back wages butwith continuity of service and attendant benefits . Ordered accordingly . No Cost .
17. The reference is answered accordingly.
( Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him. corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 4th September, 2003. )
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer.
Witnesses Examined :-
: Nil
Oneither side
Documents Marked:--
ForI Party/ Workman : Nil For II Party/Management:
Ex. No. Date
Description
M1
29-09-99 Xerox copy of the charge sheet issued to the Petitioner M2
11-10-99 Xerox copy of the reply submittedby Petitioner M3
03-12-99 Xerox copy ofthe letter from EnquiryOfficer to Petitioner M4
03-12-99 Xerox copy of the notice of enquiry.
M5
25-03-99 Xerox copy of the report ofthe SeniorManager, Tuticorin to ChiefManager , Alwaye. 26-03-99
M6
Xerox copy of the report of the senior Manager , Tuticorinto ChiefManger , Alwaye .
M7
09-06-99 Xerox copy of the report of the Senior Manager, Tuticorin to Assistant General Manger Alwaye.
[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ] M8
11-06-99 Xerox copy of the report ofthe Senior Manager, Tuticorin to Chief Manager Alwaye .
M9
11-06-99 Xerox copy of the compliant givenby N. Llangovan To Senior Manager ofTuticorin branch .
M10
16-06-99 Xerox copy of the report of the Senior Manager, Tuticorin to Assistant General Manger Alwaye,
M11
14-07-99 Xerox copy of the report of the Senior Manager, Tuticorin to Chief Manager, Alwaye .
M12
16-07-99 Xerox copy of the report of the Senior Manager , Tuticorin to Chief Manager , Alwaye .
M13
20-07-99 Xerox copy ofthe report of the Senior Manager, Tuticorin to ChiefManager , Alwaye .
M14
31-08-99 Xerox copy of the report ofthe Senior Manager , Tuticorin to ChiefManager , Alwaye .
M15
17-09-99 Xerox copy ofthe report ofthe Senior Manager , Tuticorin to Chief Manager , Alwaye .
M16
22-09-99 Xerox copy ofthe report of the Senior Manager , Tuticorin to Chief Manager , Alwaye .
M17
08-06-99 Xerox copy of the memo issued to Petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority.
M18
16-06-99 Xerox copy ofthe memo issued to Petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority .
M19
18-06-99 Xerox copy of the memo issued to Petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority.
M20
26-03-99 Xerox copy of the office note/ order.
M21
Nil
Xerox copy of the office note/ order .
M22
June , 99 Xerox copy of the attendance register for June to August, 1999 of Tuticorin branch .
M23
19-07-99 Xerox copy of the memo issued to Petitioner by the Chief Manager.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
6803
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
M24
06-10-99 Xerox copyofthe memo issued to Petitioner by the Chief Manager.
M25
Nil
Xerox copy of the office note/ orderwith regard to work allot- ment.
M26
Nil
Xerox copy of the office note/ order.
M27
31-07-99 Xerox copy of the memo issued to Petitioner by the Chief Manager.
M28
14-08-99 Xerox copy ofthe memo issued to Petitioner by the Chief Manager.
14-06-99
M29
Xerox copy ofthe memo issued to Petitioner by the Chief Manager.
M30
Nil
Xerox copy ofthe office note/ order.
M31
Xerox copy of the enquiry proceedings .
M32
Xerox copy of the enquiry findings.
M33 03-01-2000 Xerox copy of the written arguments submitted by Petitioner before the domestic enquiry.
M34
11-01-2000 Xerox copy of the letter from Disciplinary Authority to Petitioner.
M35 25-01-2000 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Chief Manager , Alwaye.
M36
21-02-2000 Xerox copy of the order of Disciplinary Authority .
M37 02-03-2000 Xerox copy of the proceedings ofpersonal hearing
M38 08-05-2000 Xerox copy of the order of Disciplinary Authority impo- sing punishment of dismissal from service without notice .
नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 943.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पश्चिम रेलवे,कोटा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण कोटा के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.टी/सी/ 5/ 2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-09-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल.-41012/96/89- आई० आर० ( बी-1 ) ]
अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 19th September, 2003 S.O. 2943. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( I.T/C/ 5 /2002) of the Industrial . Tribunal , Kota now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway, Kota and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 18-9-2003 .
[No. L-41012/96/89- IR(B-I) ]
AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer .
अनुबन्ध
न्यायाधीश, औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण/केन्द्रीय/कोटा/राज.
पीठासीन अधिकारी- श्री मणि शंकर व्यास, आर. एच. के . एस.
निर्देशन प्रसारण क्रमांकः ओ. न्या./केन्द्रीय 5/2002 दिनांक स्थापित : 17-1-2002
प्रसंग : भारत सरकार, श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली के आदेश दिनांक एल-41012/96/89 - आई आर ( बीयू) बी.आई. दिनांक 29/3/90 एवं सपठित स्थानांतरण आदेश दिनांक 20/12/001 निर्देश अन्तर्गत धारा 10( 1 ) (ख)
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 मध्य
श्री जमाल अहमद द्वारा डिविजनल सेकेट्री, पश्चिम रेलवे कर्मचारी परिषद, कोटा
-प्रार्थी श्रमिक
एवं
डी.आर.एम. पश्चिम रेलवे , कोटा ।
-अप्रार्थी नियोजक
उपस्थित
प्रार्थी श्रमिक की ओर से प्रतिनिधि
श्री ए.डी. ग्रोवर अप्रार्थी नियोजक की ओर से प्रतिनिधि श्री श्याम गुप्ता अधिनिर्णय दिनांक: 31-7-2003
अधिनिर्णय
भारत सरकार, श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली के उक्त प्रारम्भिक आदेश दिनांक 29-3-90 एवं सपठित स्थानांतरण आदेश दिनांक 20/12/2001 द्वारा निम्न निर्देश/ विवाद, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (जिसे तदुपरान्त " अधिनियम " से सम्बोधित किया जायेगा ) की 6804
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
धारा 10( 1 ) ( 5 ) के अन्तर्गत इस न्यायाधिकरण को अधिनिर्णयार्थ सम्प्रेषित किया गया है
"Whether the action of the D.R.M. , Western Railway, Kota to impose punishment to Sh . Jameel Ahmad , HD TTE, Kotaby stopping 2 increments for 2 years's without future effect is justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
2. उक्त स्थानान्तरण आदेश के साथ प्राप्त निर्देश/विवाद को न्यायाधिकरण में दर्ज रजिस्टर उपरान्त पक्षकारों को सूचना विधिवत् रूप से जारी की गयी ।
3. प्रस्तुत प्रकरण में उभयपक्ष के विद्वान प्रतिनिधि आज न्यायाधिकरण में उपस्थित हुए । स्वयं प्रार्थी श्रमिक प्रतिनिधि श्री ए.डी. ग्रोवर ने यह प्रकट किया कि चूंकि इस प्रकरण से सम्बन्धित प्रार्थी श्रमिक श्री जमील अहमद की दौरान विचारण मृत्यु हो चुकी है और अब उसकी ओर से अभिलेख पर कोई विधिक वारिसा न भी प्रार्थी पक्षकार के रूप में उपलब्ध नहीं है, इन परिस्थिति में वो स्वयं प्रकरण में कोई कार्यवाही आगे नहीं चाहते हैं, अतः निर्देश/विवाद को अन्तिम रूप से अधिनिर्णित कर दिया जावे । अप्रार्थी पक्ष भी प्रार्थी पक्ष के उक्त कथन से सहमत है ।
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] to the management of IISCO and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 15-9-2003 .
[No. L-20012/73/2001 - IR(C-I)]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:
SHRI B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer (Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947
REFERENCE No. 172/2001
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of IISCO'S Chasnala Colliery and their workman.
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf ofthe Workman : None
Onbehalfof the Employers : Shri D. K. Verma, Advocate.
State : Jharkhand
बहस पक्षकारों की सुनी गयी । चूंकि स्वयं प्रार्थी श्रमिक के विद्वान प्रतिनिध्रिके कथनानुसार प्रार्थी श्रमिक जमील अहमद की मृत्यु हो चुकी है और कोई विधिक वारिसान भी उसकी ओर से अभिलेख पर प्रार्थी पक्षकार के रूप में उपलब्ध नहीं है जिस कथन से अप्रार्थीपक्ष भी सहमत हैं, ऐसी स्थिति में यह निर्देश/विवाद स्वतः ही उपशमित हो गया है और इस न्यायाधिकरण द्वारा भी कोई कार्यवाही विधिक रूप से किया जाना वांछनीय नहीं रहा है । अतः सम्प्रेषित निर्देश/ विवाद तद्नुसार अधिनिर्णित कर उत्तरित किया जाता है जिसे समुचित सरकार को नियमानुसार प्रकाशनार्थ भिजवाया जावे ।
मणिशंकर व्यास , न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2944.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ईस्कोके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भी संख्या 172/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-09-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं . एल.- 20012/73/2001- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव NewDelhi, the 19th September , 2003 S.O. 2944. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 172/ 2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial . Tribunal / Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation
Industry: Coal Dated, Dhanbad the 26th August, 2003
ORDER
TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/73 / 2001 (C -I) , dated the 24th May, 2001 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of IISCO , Chasnala Colliery in superannuating Sri Devraj Varik, Leader w.e.f. 3-1-2001 is legal , justified and proper? If not, to what relief is the workman concerned entitled?"
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared . However , though the management side appeared through their learned Advocate , did not file their WS . It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 3-7-2001 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workman failed to appear before this Tribunal , registered notices were issued to the workman side but in spite of the issuance of notices they failed to appear before thisTribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise what will be the fact of the reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of the dispute raised by the concerned workman/ union . Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/union to assist the Trbunal to dispose of the reference on merit . In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002 (94) FLR 624 it will not [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
6805
भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
bejust and proper to pass 'No dispute' Award when both the parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to held that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S. documents , such expectation to dispose ofthe reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Tribunal will persue the matter suo motu with the expectation for appearance of the workman in spite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute . The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workman. These unions in spite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Tribunal for the interestof the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice . Untill and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely it is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of bothsides. Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing ofthe case for disposal on merit.
Under the facts and circumstances, balso do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the came for an indefinite pedriod . Accordingly as there is no sope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
B.BISWAS Presiding officer नई दिल्ली , 19 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2945.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-09-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 20012/453/2000- आई आर ( सी- I ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th September, 2003 S.O. 2945. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 48/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial. Tribunal/ Labour Cour II, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003 .
[No. L-20012/453/2000- IR(C- I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy .
2803 G1/03-23
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :
SHRI B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer (Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act. , 1947
REFERENCE No. 48 of 2001
PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of M/s. B.C.C.L. and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalfof the Workman : Shri K. Chakravarty, Advocate
Onbehalf of the employers : Shri U.N. Lal , Advocate.
State: Jharkhand
Industry: Coal Dated, Dhanbad the 26th August, 2003
AWARD
TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 )( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/453/ 2000 (C- I ) , dated the 19th February, 2001 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/s . BCCL in reverting back the workman Sri Kalipada Mahato Bastacolla Area from the post of Clerk (T) to General Mazdoor by nulifying the selection and posting order dated 15-5-92 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?" 2. In this reference both the parties appeared through their learned Advocates . Subsequently in course of hearing Learned Advocate for the workman submitted his prayer to pass a ' No dispute' Award in this reference , as the concerned workman involved in this dispute is not interested to proceed with the hearing of this case . Learned Advocate for the management raised no objection if the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of ' No dispute' Award. Sincethe workman involved in this reference is not interested to proceed with this case, there is no reason to drag on the same . Under the circumstances , a ' No dispute' Award is rendered and the reference is disposed of on the basis of' No dispute' Award presuming non -existence of any industrial dispute between the parties presently.
B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2946. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार 6806
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11,2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
dismissing Sh Sabir Alam w.e.f. 30-10-1993 is justified? If not to what relief is the concerned workman entitled to ? "
भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधितंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरणा II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 46/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-09-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 20012/406/96-आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
NewDelhi , the 19th September, 2003
S.O. 2946. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 46/98) of the Central Government Industrial. Tribunal/ Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of BCCL and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003.
[No. L-20012/406/96- IR(C- I) ]
S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act , 1947.
Reference No. 46 of 1998
PARTIES:
Employers in relation to the management of Muraidih Colliery ofM/s . B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf ofthe Workman : None
None
Onbehalf of the Employers :
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
Dhanbad, Dated the 26th August, 2003
ORDER
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman norhis representative appeared .However , the management side through his representative though appeared on occasion and filed authorisaton in this reference before this Tribunal but did not submit any written statement . It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 16-3-1998 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workman failed to appear, registered notices were issued to the workman side. but in spite of issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise what will be the fate of the reverence made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of the dispute raised by the concerned workman/ union. Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/union to assist the Court to dispose ofthe reference in issue on merit . In view of the decision reported in 2002(94) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass 'No dispute ' Award when both parties remain absent. There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S./documents , such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end. It is not expected that for years together the Tribunal will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the workman inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrlal dispute . The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workman . These unions in spite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Tribunal for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice. Until and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely it is the duty of the Courtto dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides .Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit.
T TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/406/ 96- IR(C- I) , dated the 20th May, 1998 .
SCHEDULE
Inview ofthe facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer "Whether the action ofthe General Manager Barora area No. I M/s . BCCL , P.O. Nawgarh (Dhanbad ), in 6807 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर, 2003
India Ltd. (the company for short) and Shashikala Jatav (theworkman for short) in the following terms . The initial terms were corrected by Corrigendum 19th May, 2002 correcting the date of termination as 15-1-1993 . The terms are being reproduced as per corrigendum after correcting typing error.
का. आ. 2947. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एअर इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण I, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/15/97- आईआर ( सी-1 ) ]
"Whether the action of the management ofM/s . Air India Ltd. , Mumbai in dismissing the services ofMs. Shashikala Jatav, ex- Air Hostess w.e.f. 15-1-1993 is legal and justified? If not , then what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ? " एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 19th September , 2003
The corrigendum says that the order of dismissal took effect on 15-1-1993 . The parties agrees that should be 05-1-1993 .
S. O. 2947. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court I, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Air India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003 .
[No. L- 11012/15 /97 -IR(C- I)]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 : MUMBAI
PRESENT
Shri Justice S. C. Pandey
PresidingOffice.
REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 11/1998
Parties :
Employers in relation to the management of
AirIndia
and
Their Workmen
2. The undisputed facts of this case are that the workman was employed by the company as an air hostess from 17-2-1983 . At the time of employment of the workman, the company was governed by Air India Corporation Act 1953. The Air India Corporation had framed Air India Employees Service Regulation . However , Air india ceased to be a Corporation. It was converted into a Public Ltd. company by Air Corporations (Transfer of Undertakings and Repeal Act , 1994) . It is also not in dispute that the service conditions of employees of the company were governedbyModel Standing Orders framed by the Central Government as per Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946 till they were replaced by the Certified Standing Orders . These rules were framed by Central Govt. under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders ) Act of 1946. It is not in dispute the company dismissed the workman pursuant to an ex parte enquiry against by order dated 23-11-92 with effect from the date of communication of that order . Both the party agree that pursuant to that order the workman dismissed on 5-1-1993 and not on 15-1-93 . This tribunal takes this date to be correct date of dismissal . The order was passed by Mr. K. Sapat, Deputy Director , Inflight service . It was he who issued the charge sheet dated 12/ 15-10-1990 (Exhibit W- 19) under signature against the workman . She was charged with following charges framed under Model Standing Orders .
APPEARANCES :
(a) Absence without leave for more than ten days .
For the Management : Mr. Lancy D'Souza,
For the Workman
(b) Wilful insubordination and disobedience of lawful and reasonable order of a superior ;
: Mr. Mohan Bir Singh, Advocate.
(c) Act subversive of discipline.
State
: Maharashtra
Mumbai, dated 28th day of August , 2003 AWARD
It is not further disputed on behalf of the both the parties that as per judgement dated May 13 , 1994 the approval application No. NTB - 1 of 1993 ( arising out ofReference No. NTB- 1 of 1990) was allowed . The order of dismissal was approved by the then Presiding Officer Justice Shri R.G. Sindhkar by aforesaidjudgement marked as W-48 .
1. This is reference made by the Central Government to this tribunal in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of Sub -section 1 and Sub- section 2A of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act for short) for passing an award after adjudication of the Industrial dispute between the Air
3. The points of law raised by either party can be disposed of. Therefore , it is not necessary to refer to factual 6808
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11,2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] disputes at this stagte of decision . In the opinion of this tribunal the case can be disposed of on these facts alone . This tribunal had framed issue No. 1 which is as follows:
"Whether the reference made by the Central Government is maintainable? "
The issue is based on the plea of the company that thejudgement dated 13-5-1998 is resjudicata. However, this tribunal framed another issue which was not framed earlier . It is argued on behalf of the workman that the order of dismissał dated 23-11-1992 which became effective on 15-1-1993 on communication is void. It is argued that neither the charge sheet was issued by the Competent disciplinary authority; nor was the order of dismissal passed by the Competent Disciplinary Authority. In view ofthe admitted facts stated above this tribunal frames the following additional preliminary issue as I -A.
"Whether the order dismissed dated 23-11-1992 passed by the Deputy Director, Inflight Service can be legally sustained?"
4. It is now necessary to decide first ifthe reference made by the Central Govt. can be rejected for the reason thatjudgement dated 13-5-1998 is resjudicata. The learned counsel for the company has vehemently argued that judgement dated 13-5-1998 Exhibit 46 is rej siudicata rendering the entire reference non- maintainable . It is equally vehemently countered by the learned counsel for the workman that the reference cannot be rejected merely because approval has been granted to order of dismissal.
Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. vs. Ramgopal Sharma 2002 I LLJ 834 it has been pointed out that order of approval completes the in choate order of the employer , when the condidtion for obtaining approval apply . This view is conclusive of the matter as it is passed by the Constitutional Bench of Supreme Court . It is clear that the view of Justice Shri GajendraGadkar in Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. vs. S.N. Moldak (1965 ) II LLJ 128 was approved. In that case the view appeared to be that proceedings under section 33 (2) (b) of the Act continuation of proceedings for dismissal , discharge or punishment on account of Statutory compulsion upon the employer. In view of this matter it is difficult to hold that the reference can said to be barred by principles of resjudicata . If this tribunal was merely completing what the employer had done , then it was not performing any adjudicatory function . It was looking at case only from the point of view of prima facie case . The learned counsel for the company has cited the decision Five Judge Bench in the case of Bengal Bhatdec Coal Company vs. Ram Prabesh Singh 1963 I LLJ 291. The case was not decided on the question of resjudicata. In that case the tribunal had not given any findings its award specifically that the domestic enquiry was vitiated for not following the principles of natural justice or on the ground. ofperverse findings . However , the Supreme Court was of the view that since the tribunal had earlier approved the action, it could not have done otherwise . It appears to this tribunal that Justice Shri Wanchoo had used the judgement of approval as evidence that domestic enquiry was not vitiated. This case was not decided on principles of resjudicata but on the principle that order of approval is good evidence for unpholding the enquiry in absenece of any other material . The use of language . " It can hardlydo SO . ." at page 293 indicate that the Supreme Court assumed that finding to be correct . It appears this was a case where no material placed before the tribunal in reference . Moreoever, it has been held by a Division bench of Calcutta High Court in Graphite India Ltd. vs. State of Bengal 1980 II LLJ29 , by the Division Bench of High Court ofGujarat in M/s . Echjay Industries (P) Ltd. vs. Maheshwar Singh Shiverbha 1994 II 1234 and Division Bench Bombay High Court in Airo Plast Pvt . Ltd. vs. D. N. Gawde 1995 II LLJ 571. This view has been taken by Orissa High Court in Management of Orissa Road Transport Corporation vs. workman T. Bengalputra 1992 Lab IC 1853. It is not necessary to cite more decisions for stating the general principle that adjudicatory power is different and Section 11A of the Act has given much wider power to labour court or tribunal .
6. The next issue No.1 - A has been raised on behalf ofthe workman. It has been argued that in paragraph 4 of Statement ofClaim it has been pleaded as follows:
"Theperson who issued the order oftermination is not empowered to issue such an order under the Model Standing Orders . He was never appointed the Manager The application of approval has to be filed by the employer on account of Statutory obligation imposed upon itunder section 33 (2)(b) of the Act read with section 33 (1 ) thereof. It has been held that this sub section puts an embargo on the employer to pass an order of discharge dismissal or punishment for any misconduct not connected with dispute mentioned in sub section 1 of section 33 pending before the authorities . It has been pointed out that conciliation officer or Board are not adjudicatory authorities . They have been clubbed with adjudicatory authorities . i.e. the arbitrator , the Labour Court, the Industrial Tribunal, or the National Tribunal . Therefore , it cannot be said the powers exercised by the authorities mentioned in section 33 (2) and (5) approving the dismissal for misconduct can be adjudicatory . This was the view of Justice N.H. Bhagwati in the case of Atherton West & Co. Ltd. vs. Smt . Mazdoor Udyog and Justice Shri S.R. Das , Automobile Products of India Ltd. vs. Rukmaji Bala 1955 I LLJ 348. It has been pointed out by Justice S.R. Das in the latter that the provisions that he was dealing with provisions in par material with section 33 ofthe Act . This view has been accepted . It is , therefore, difficult to hold that the decision ofan authority not exercising adjudicatory functions would bind the workman from raising an industrial dispute for adjudication or the appropriate Government . Moreover, in the recent decision of Jaipur Zila Saahakari 6809 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
of the establishment nor has his name/designation been notified as required to be done under the law Industrial Employment (standing orders) Act, 1946": Therefore , it cannot be said by the company that plea regarding the competence of Deputy Director Inflight to pass the order of dismissal was not specifically taken as was argued on behalf of the company in its reply. On the other hand it is argued that no specific reply was given to allegations aforseaid.in paragraph 4 of Statement of Claim . The plead- ings in paragraph 10 of written statement were examined by this tribunal . There was no specific reply in paragraph 10 of the written statement which is the reply paragraph 4 of Statement of claim . Even otherwise there is nothing in the entire pleadings to justify the stand of the company that order of dismissal dated 23-11-92 was passed by the authority competent to do so by rebutting the aforesaid allegations.
7. However , this tribunal permitted the counsel for the company to place on record the order whereby the Acting Chairman and Managing Director delegated the power of disciplinary authorities . It reads as under:
AIR INDIA HEADQUARTERS BOMBAY
Nov. 17, 1990
8. It appears from above Manager , Cabin Crew/Chief Air Hostess or its equivalent or Station Manager or its equivalent had power to pass an order any punishment prescribed under the rules/orders in respect workman not above the grade of Senior Check Air Hostess . The appellate Authority Senior Station Manager/Senior Manager Cabin crew or its equivalent. It is not in dispute that the workman was working as an Air hostess . Then Manager Cabin Crew/ Chief Air Hostess or Station Manger could pass order of dismissal . The order of dismissal could be appealable to Senior Station Manager /Senior Manager cabin crew or its equivalent . It appears to this tribunal that despite the delegation of power in favour of aforesaid authorities , the order of dismissal was passed by the Deputy Director Inflight service. It is clear from paragraph 2 of notice dated 17-1-1990 that it was issued Pursuant to the judgement of Delhi High Courtdated 27-8-1990 in writ petition No. 637 of 1988. In that writ petition the Delhi High Court had taken the view that the Service conditions of the employees of Air India Corporation were not governed by Air India Employees Regulation. The Model Standing Orders applied in respect of Disciplinary matters . The Model Standing Orderprovide as follows regarding the provision of Appeal asper clause 14(6) .
HQ/72-39( a)/5776
NOTICE
" 14 ( 6) (a) A workman aggrieved by an order imposing punishment may within twenty one days from the date of receipt of the order, appeal to the appellate authority.
(b) the employer shall , for the purposes of clause (a) specify the appellate authority.
The list of the authorities who are empowered to take disciplinary action and to hear the appeals arising out of the Orders passed thereon in respect of each of the Departments is notified as specified in the Annexure ' A ' . Thisnotification is issued under the Model Standing Orders (Central ) and is applicable and will cover only such ofthose employees who are covered by the definition of workman under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946.
(c) The appellate authority , after giving an opportunity to the workman of being heard, shall pass such order as he thinks proper on the appeal within fifteen days of its receipt and communicate the same to the workman in writing.
This notification is issued without prejudice to all rights and contentions of Air India as to the applicability and operation of the Air India Employees ' Service Regulations including any appeal that may be filed against the order and Judgement of the Delhi High Court dated August 27, 1990 in Writ Petition No. 637 of 1988 .
(S. R. GUPTE)
Actg. Chairman & Managing Director
Workman Appeal lies
Authority empowered
Nature of Punish- ment
whom pun- to ishment can be Imposed.
IN FLIGHT SERVICE DEPTT.
Sr. Station
To any work-
Any one
Manager.
man not
or more
above the Sr. Manager
the puni-
Cabin Crew
shment grade of
(a) Manager - Cabin Crew/Chief Air Hostess or its equivalent .
senior or its equiva-
lent .
pres- cribed Check Air
Hostess or equivalent .
(b) Station Manger Or its equivalent
9. The Acting Chairman and Managing Director appears to have passed order dated 17-11-90 on account of situation created by the order of Delhi High Court . It is apparent from the notice itself that an appeal was filed. Both the learned counsel stated the situation is that the case of the parties was governed by Model Standing Orders and not by the Air India Employees Service Regulations . Aperusal of item No. 12( 1 )( a) and (b ) ofnotice dated 17-11- 90 shows that Manager Cabin Crew/Chief Air Hostess or its equivalent could pass the order of any of the punishment . It appears some power is conferred upon Station Manager or its equivalent . This power is to be exercised in respect of a workman not above the grade of Senior Check Air Hostess or its equivalent. The workman in question was an Air Hostess . Therefore , she was governed by item No. 12 captioned as Inflight service . It 6810
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]
have been passed in accordance with notice dated 17-11-1990. The workman can claim that she was deprived of right to appeal to the proper authority . Moreover , the Model Standing Orders are binding on the employer and the employee . Therefore , an appellate authority fixed by notice/order dated 17-11-90 would be the proper authoirty to whom appeal lies . There is no provision for appeal against the order Deputy Director Inflight. In fact there is no authority vested in him to pass the order of dismissal in the Annexure A to 17-11-1990 . The position that emerges is that on the date the order of dismissal was passed i.e. 12-23 November, 1993 , the Director Inflight had no power vested in him to pass the order as a Competent Authority. There was no provision to file an appeal against such order . It iswell established that wherever statute provides right ofappeal it is treated as substantive right . In this case the right of appeal is conferred by rules in the shape of Model Standing Orders . The workman was deprived of his right ofappeal because under the Annexure ' A' ibid there is no right appeal against the order of Deputy Director Inflight . In fact there was no power in him to pass the order of dismissal on 12-23 November , 1992. Therefore , it was necessary for the authority issuing the order of dismissal to act in accordance with the Annexure A item 12 of notice/order dated 17-11-1990 . The general rule of Statutorty conferred power is that whenever the Statute provides certain things to be done in a particular manner then things should be done in that manner only . Other methods of doing them are impliedly forbidden . This principles called from mTaylor ( 1875 ) 1 Chd 426 has been also applied by Supreme Court to purely administrative power. i.e. disconnecting a telephone as a penal measure . The Supreme Court in the case of Harkim Chand Shyam Lal Vs. Union of India An 1976. SC 789 at page 794 has examined the nature of that power and having found to be drastic, which dispenses with the principles of natural justice, it has been held that at least manner of its exercise should be construed strictly . Here the workman was entitled to a right of apeal as per Model Standing Orders . However , that manner of exercise of that right was fixed by Notice/ Orderdated 17-11-1990. If this was not done then the workman was deprived of that right of appeal . This tribunal holds that the manner of exercise of right was mandatory . i.e. the authority authorized to pass the order of dismissal ought to have passed the order of dismissal 12-23 / 11- 1993. This was not done , therefore , the order dsimssal is bad in the eye of law.
T wouldbe readily seen that item No; 12 shows the Deputy Director of Inflight was not named. There is no evidence on record to suggest that the post of Deputy Director of Inflight was equivalent in grade to that of persons mentioned in item No. 12 of Annexure A to notice dated 17-11-1990. It appears to this tribunal that the company had full knowledge of the scheme ofgradation of its various Officers . If the Deputy Director in Inflight service was equated was in the same grade , there is not good reason to withholdthat information . Further Section 109 of Evidence Actwouldplace the burden of proof upon the company. This point was not ever argued . It appears to this tribunal the item No. 12 that the notice/order dated 17-11-1990 shows that the henceforth the disciplinary action should be taken as per scheme . Now if we read item No. 12 and its last column (No. 4) it would be clear that the authorities to which the appeal shall be filed would be Senior Station Manager, Senior Manager Cabin crew or its equivalent. Now, it was for the company to show to whom the workman could have filed the appeal ifthe Deputy Director, inflight had passed the order . It is obvious that the appellate authority should be higher in grade . No attempt was made to give an answer in accordance with the Annexure 1 to the notice /order dated 17-11-1990 for apparently the order of dismissal was not passed in accordance with its notice . It is true that at the time the chargesheet dated 12/ 15-10-1990 (ExW- 19) was framed there was no delegation . However , by the time the order dated 12-23 November , 1992 dismmissing the workman was passed it is clear that order ofdelegation had been passed on 17-11-1990 . Therefore , it has been argued that Deputy Director of inflight service , who had issued the chargesheet, could pass the order of dismmissal. This argument cannot be accepted for the reason the chargesheet was framed as per Air India Employees Service Regulations , 1947. The Schedule II read with regulation 44 ( 1 ) of these regulations defined the competent Authority in relation to any employees specified in column No. 4 of schedule 1 , to mean the authorities specified in corresponding entry in column No. 2 ofschedule 1. Thus in item No. XII of Schedule 1 of the aforesaid regulations deals with Inflight service Department . The Deputy Director of inflight service was the Competent authority to impose all the punishment of any employee not above grade of Station Superintendent / ChiefAir hostess or its equivalent . The appellate Authority wasDeputy Manager . When these regulations were held to be not applicable to workman , the company could not rely on these regulations . The order of the High Court in W. P. No. 637 of 1988 dated August 27 1990 , would , govern this case also . The Final judgement of supreme Court has notbeen filed to show the view of the High Court, Delhi wasupset. No.judgement of the Apex Court was brought notice of this tribunal deciding in fabvour company the question of application of Regulations . The Company has conceded before this Tribunal that the Regulations were not applicable . Therefore , order of dismissal could
The next question that arises for determination is What is the consequence of the Order of dismissal dated 12/23-11-92 passed by Deputy Director of Inflight Service ? It must also be noticed that the order of dismissal dated 12/23-11-92, became effective from 05-1-1993 , on approval granted by this tribunal by judgement dated 13 May , 1994 passed by this tribunal in approval application No. 1 of 1993. In view ofjudgement ofSupreme Court, that statutory approval under section 33 (2) ( b ) of the Act has to be [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
mandatorily obtained in order to made order of dismissal effective it cannot be held that order was void abnitio even after passing of order of approval . Even though the finding recorded in approval application may not be resjudicata the adjudicatory power ofthis tribunal cannot confer upon its power to sit in judgement against the conclusion in the judgement dated 13th May, 1994. This tribunal is exercising co - ordinate jurisdiction and not sitting in appeal against its own order. The legal effect is that the order of approval made the order of dismissal effective from the date it was passed . Therefore, it cannot declared void from 23-11-1993 . This tribunal has to set aside the order of dismissal dated 23-11-93 . The learned counsel for the workman has brought to my notice a decision of Hindustan Brown Barawri Ltd. , Vs. Their Workman 1968 ( 1 ) LLJ571 . In that case , it had been found by the Labour Court , that enquiry held against two workmen was fair and proper, but the purported order of dismissal of one and demotion of another was bad because power of dismissal or demotion was not vested in the Works Manager . The Supreme Court after interpreting the relevant Standing Orders upheld the order of Labour Court holding that the Works Manager had no authority to dismiss or demote the concerned workman respectively. The aforesaid view ofSupreme Court affirms the legal position that an order ofdismissal passed by an authority not competent is bad notwithstanding the fact that the enquiry is proper. Accordingly the order dated 12/23-11-92 passed by Deputy Director of Inflight Service is hereby set aside .
11. It is not necessary to go into question regarding the validity of domestic enquiry which was apparently held under a charge sheet issued as per Air India Employees Service Regulations . Therefore , issues rgarding the validity ofenquiry are left open.
12. The next question is the relief to which the workman is entitled . The record of the case has been examinedby ine from the point of view of reliefthat workman should be given. This tribunal does not express any considered opinion from the point of view of the merits of case of the workman . However, purely from the point of view of relief to be granted to her , this tribual finds that she is not one of those persons who should be granted the relief back wages with reinstatennent . The correspondence between the company and the workman speaks volumes against her . She cannot be treated as a shining example . Moreover , the workman had not worked . Therefore , the ends of justice will be met by granting her relief of reinstatement. She will not get any back wages .
6811
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर, 2003
का.आ. 2948.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार जैट एअर प्रा० लि० , के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 35/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -11012/26/2003- आईआर( सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th September , 2003 S.O. 2948. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/5/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court II , Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between theemployees in relation to the management of Jet Air Pvt . Ltd. , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003.
[No. L- 11012/26/2003 - IR(C- I) ] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO. 2 : MUMBAI
PRESENT S.N. SAUNDANKAR PresidingOfficer
REFERENCE NO. CGIT- 2/35 OF 2003 EMPLOYERS IN RELATIONS TO THE MANAGEMENT OF JET AIR PVT. LIMITED.
Senior Manager ( Legal and Properties .)
M/s. Jetair Pvt . Limited , 41/42 , Maker Chambers III , Nariman Point , Mumbai -400021 Vs.
THEIR WORKMEN
Shri Ashok More , FlatNo. 47, Room No. 32 , Anand Co- op . Housing Society Ltd. , Gorai - I
Mumbai-400091
13. Thus , the reference aforesaid is answered by stating that action of dismissing the services of the workman Ms. Shashikala Jatav Ex. Air Hostess w.e.f. 5-1-1993 (Not. 15-1-1993 ) is not legal . The wrokman shall get the relief of reinstatement only . There shall be no order as to costs .
S.C. PANDEY, PresidingOfficer.
APPEARANCES :
FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. A.N. Mulla, Advocate FOR THE WORKMAN : No Appearance .
6812
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11,2003 /ASVINA 19, 1925
Mumbai , dated 28th August, 2003
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 11012/26/2003 - IR(C-I) dated 23-06-2003 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication
" Whether the action of the management of M/s. Jetair Pvt. Ltd. , Mumbai terininating the services of Shri Ashok More w.e.f. 30-1-2002 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman Shri Ashok More entitled ? ""
2.Onreceipt ofreference this Tribunal issued notices (Exhibit-2) to both the parties i.e. workman Møre and the management Jetair, however, workman though served (vide Exhibit-4) remained absent, whereas management counsel was present. By purshis (Exhibit -6) The management's counsel pointed out that the matter has been settled and that workman More was paid Rs . 1,47,277 by way of full and final settlement vide deed dated 10-4-2003 , therefore the reference be disposed of. Hence the order:
ORDER
Reference stands disposed of as settled vide deed dated 10-4-2003 enclosed with Exhibit-6
S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer.
Exhibit-6
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2 AT MUMBAI REFERENCE NO . CGIT -2/35 OF 2003
BETWEEN
Jetair Pvt. Ltd.
AND
Their Workmen (Shri Ashok More) MAY IT PLEASE THE HON'BLE TRIBUNAL :
Itissubmitted on behalf of the First Party Company that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The copy of the 2 (p) Settlement with forwarding letter to the Regional Labour Commissioner (C) dated 10-4-2003 duly signed by the parties is annexed hereto as Annexure " A" . The same may please be taken on record and the matter may be disposed of as settled and award may be passed accordingly.
Mumbai Dated 28-8-2003
ForJETAIR PVT. LTD . A.N. MULLA , Advocate .
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Date:April 10, 2003
The Regional Labour Commissioner (C) , Shramraksha Bhavan , Shivsruti Road, Eastern Express Highway, Soin, Mumbai-400022 Sir,
Wearejontly forwarding herewith copy of settlement dated10-04-2003 between M/ s . Jetair Pvt . Ltd. , and Shri Ashok More .
Kindly register the same
Yoursfaithfully,
ForJETAIR PVT . LIMITED
ASHOK MORE , Workman
DR. SURESH C. NERKAR GeneralManager-HRD. Copy: The Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT [Under Section 2(p) read with Section 18( 1 ) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and rule 62 of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules , 1957]
BETWEEN
M/s. Jetair Pvt. Ltd. 41/42, Maker Chambers III , Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 AND
Shri Ashok More Flat No. 47, Room No. 32 , Anand Co - op . Hsg . Scty. Gorai- I , Mumbai-91
SHORT RECITAL
Whereas Shri Ashok More (hereinafter referred to as the "Workman " ) was in the employment of M/s. Jetair Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the " Company " ) .
And whereas the services of the Workman were terminated by way of dismissal by order dated 30-1-2002 for commission of acts of misconduct after holding a domestic enquriy.
And whereas the Workman did not accept the legal dues sent by the Company by cheque at the residential address of the Workman .
And whereas the Workman raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer ( Central )-III and demanded that he should be reinstated in the employment of the Company with full backwages and other benefits with effect from 30-1-2002 . However , no settlement could be arrived at before the Conciliation Officer.
6813 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन19, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central) , Mumbai .
Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) , Mumbai .
RECEIPT
Andwhereas by letter dated 9-03-2003 the Workman stated that he was not interested in reinstatement and/ or re-employment with the Company and wished to relinquish his claim for reinstatement and backwages provided the Company paid him some compensation over and above his legal dues .
And whereas the representatives of the Company and the Workman held discussions to amicably settle the matter.
Received a sum of Rs . 1,47,277 (Rupees One Lac Forty Seven Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Seven only) by cheque number 861376 dated 10-04-2003 drawn on Global Trust Bank Ltd. , Nariman Point Branch , Mumbai- 400 021 in terms of the above settlement inlcuding compensation.
Date: 10-4-2003
Stamp Ashok More Workman And whereas as a result of the said discussions the Company and the Workman arrived at an amicable settlement on the following terms and conditions , which they wish to record with the intent that the same be final and binding upon them under Section 2(p ) read with Section 18( 1) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 :--
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
नई दिल्ली , 19 सितम्बर , 2003
1. The Company agrees to pay and the Workman hereby accepts an amount of Rs . 88,615 ( Rupees Eighty Eight Thousand Six Hundred Fifteen only) in full and final settlement of all his legal dues including leave salary , gratuity etc.
का.आ. 2949.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 304/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो लेन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -20012/462/2001- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]
एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव 11. In addition, the Company agrees to pay and the Workman hereby accepts an amount of Rs . 58,662 (Rupees Fifty Eight Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Two only ) as ex- gratiapayment to the Workman in full and final settlement ofall the dues, claims and demands of the Workman against theCompany.
New Delhi , the 19th September, 2003 III . The Workman hereby accepts the above amounts from the Company in full and finai settlement of all his claims of whatsoever nature against the Company, including the demands raised by him before the Conciliation Officer.
S.O. 2949. - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 304/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court II , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003.
IV . The Workman hereby agrees and declares that upon receipt ofthe payment as above all his claims , demands and dues , including but not limited to the claims of reinstatement, re- employment, backwages, bonus , leave gratuity, consequential benefits etc. , are fully and finally settled and satisfied .
[No. L-20012/462/2001 - IR(C -I)] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
V. The Workman further declares that he has no further claim of whatsoever nature against the Company and all his claims against the Company are hereby settled and satisfied.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD Signed at Mumbai , this 10th day of April , 2003 .
PRESENT
Jetair Pvt . Ltd.
Ashok More
Sd./-
Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer
Witness
Sd./- Witness
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
Copyto: Secretary , Ministry ofLabour, Government of India, New Delhi .
REFERENCE NO. 304 OF 2001 ChiefLabour Commissioner (Central ), New Delhi .
2803 G1/03-24 6814
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003/ASVINA 19 , 1925
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of Sudamdih Incline Mine of M/ s . BCCL and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
None.
Onbehalf ofthe workman :
Onbehalf of the employers
: Shri U. N. Lal , Advocate. State
: Jharkhand
: Coal .
Industry
Dated Dhanbad, the 26th August, 2003
ORDER
TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/462/ 2001 dated, the 29th November, 2001 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the management of Sudamdih Incline Mine isjustified in dismissing Shri Balkeshwar Belda ? If not, towhat relief is the workman entitled ? " 2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However, though the "mangement side appeared through their learned Advocate did not file their W.S. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 10-12-2001 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concernedworkman failed to appear before this Tribunal , registered notices were issued to the workman side but inspite of the issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the questionwill arise what will be the fate of the reference as made by the Ministry for its disposal. The reference is made on the basis of the dispute raised by the concerned workman/union . Naturally responsibility rests with the concernedworkman/union to assist the Tribunal to dispose ofthe reference on merit . In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002 (94) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass ' No dispute ' Award when both the parties remain absent. There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed on merit butwhen the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file Written Statement documents such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to anend. It is not expected that for years together the Tribunal will persue the matter suo mote with the expectations for appearance ofthe workman inspite of issuance ofregistered notices . As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute. The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen . These unions inspits of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Tribunal for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice . Until and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation willl persist. Definitely, it is the duty of the Tribual to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides . Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/union but yielded no result. This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period . Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the refernce in question on merit, the same is closed.
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2950.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-20012/42/97- आई. आर. (सी -1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th September , 2003 S. O. 2950. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 58/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003 .
[No. L-20012/42/97- IR(C- I)]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
3 BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) : AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
6815 Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1 )(d) ofthe I.D. Act . 1947.
REFERENCE NO . 58 of 1998
अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 114/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
PARTIES :
[सं० एल-20012/515/ 2000 - आई० आर० ( सी-1 ) ] Employers in relation to the management of BCCL and Their workman.
* स० एस ० गुप्ता, अवर सचिव APPEARANCES :
New Delhi , the 19th September, 2003 Onbehalf of the workman : Shri K. Charkravorty, Advocate.
Onbehalf ofthe employers : Shri D. K. Verma. Advocate .
State : Jharkhand
: Industry: Coal.
Dhanbad , Dated the 26th August, 2003
S. O. 2951. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 114/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003 .
AWARD
[No. L-20012/515/2000- IR(C- I)] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
TheGovt . of India, Ministry ofLabour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/42/ 97 - IR( Coal- 1 ) , dated , the 10th March , 1998 .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) : AT DHANBAD SCHEDULE
PRESENT:
Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) ofthe I.D. Act . 1947 .
REFERENCE NO . 114 of 2001
"Whether the demand ofthe Union for the placement of Shri Tuckchand Mehto Greaser ( Helper in Excava-Grade E in Grade D) with effect from 1991 with all arrears and consequent all benefits is justified? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ? "
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of M/ s. BCCL and Their workman .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman
: None .
Onbehalf of the employers
: Shri S. P. Sinha, Advocate.
State Jharkhand
Industry: Coal .
Dhanbad, Dated the 26th August, 2003
ORDER
TheGovt . of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise o the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) o the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to thi Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/515 2000 IR-(C- 1 ) , dated , the 29th November, 2001 .
2. In this case both the parties appeared throuth their learned advocates and filed Written Statement , Subsequently when the case was fixed learned advocate for the workman submitted to pass a ' No dispute ' award in this reference as the concerned workman involved in this dispute is not interested to proceed with the hearing ofthe case. Learned advocate for the management raised no objection in view of the submission made the learned advocate for the workman . Heard both sides . Since the concerned workman involved in this case is not interested to proceed inconnection with the hearing of the case , there is no reason to drag on the same . Under such circumstances , a ' No dispute ' award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of the ' No dispute ' award presuming non -existence of any industrial dispute between theparties.
SCHEDULE
B. BISWAS, Presiding Oficer
नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर, 2003
का.आ. 2951. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा ० को० को० लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
"Whether the action of the management of M/s. BCCL in not regularising the services of the workman Sri Arun Paswan and Sri Vishwanath Saw, presently designated as Miner Loader , as "Trammers " in the Bastacolla Colliery under Bastacolla Area is justified legal and proper ? Ifnot, to what relief are the said workmen entiled and from whatdate ?"
2803 G1/03-25 6816
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 285/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं० एल-20012/354/ 2001- आईआर( सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 19th September , 2003
S. O. 2952. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 285/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003.
[No. -20012/354/2001 - IR(C - I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) : AT DHANBAD . PRESENT:
Shri B. Biswas , PresidingOfficer
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947
REFERENCE NO . 285 of 2001
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Bararee Colliery of M/ s . BCCL and their workmen.
APPEARANCES :
None .
:
Onbehalf of the workman
:
Onbehalf of the employer
Shri U. N. Lall , Advocate .
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal .
Dhanbad, Dated the 26th August, 2003 ORDER
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However, though the management side appeared through their learned Advocate did not file their W.S. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 23-4-2001 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concernd workman failed to appear before this Tribunal , registered notices were issued to the workman side but inspite of the issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise what will be the fate of the reference madeby theMinistry for its dispsal. The reference is made on the basis of the dispute raised by the concerned workman/union . Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/union to assist the Court to dispose ofthe reference on merit. In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002 (94) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass ' No dispute ' Award when both the parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W. S. documents such expectation to disposeofthe reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appeaappearance of the workman inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I. D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute. The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen. These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice . Until and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely , it is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of bothsides. Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/union but yielded no result. This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012 /350 ' 2001 IR-( C- 1 ) , dated, the 10th October, 2001 .
B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer
SCHEDULE
नई दिल्ली , 19 सितम्बर, 2003
का० आ० 2952. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के
"Whether the action of the management of BCCL in denial to regularise Shri Dayashankar Prasad as Loading Clerk is justified ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date?" 6817 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 11 , 2003/आश्विन 19, 1925
बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 102/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/47/98 - आईआर (सी- I ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 19th September, 2003
S. O. 2953. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 102/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2003.
[No. L-20012/47/98 - IR(C-I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2) : AT DHANBAD.
PRESENT:
Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act. 1947 .
REFERENCE NO . 102 of 1999
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and Their workman.
APPEARANCES :
None .
:
Onbehalf of the workman
Onbehalf of the employers
: Shri U. N. Lal , Advocate.
Industry: Coal .
State : Jharkhand
Dhanbad , Dated 26th August , 2003 2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared . However, though the management side appeared through their learned Advocate did not file their W.S. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 9-11-2001 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workman failed to appear before this Tribunal, registered notices were issued to the workman side but inspite of the issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise what will be the fate of the reference is made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of the dispute raised by the concerned workman/union . Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/union to assist the Tribunal to dispose of the reference on merit . In view of the decision or the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002 (94) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass ' No dispute ' Award when both the parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W. S. documents such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Tribunal will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the workman inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I. D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute . The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen. These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice . Until and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely, it is the duty of the Tribunal to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides. Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/ union but yielded no result. This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit.
ORDER
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/47/ 98 IR (C- 1 ), dated , the 29th Januaгу, 1999 .
B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer
SCHEDULE
नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर, 2003
का. आ. 2953. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के
"Whether the action of the management of Kusunda Area of BCCL in not regularising Sri Narayan Barhi asCarpenter Mistry and 18 others as per list enclosed in time- rated job as they are working in different job 6818
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 11 , 2003 /ASVINA 19 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] asper order of mgt. for last few years is justified ? If not, to what relief are these workmen entitled ? "
consider even to file W. S. documents such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Tribunal will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the workman inspite of issuance of registered notices. As per 1. D. Act the workman excepting under provisions ofSection 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute. The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen. These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice . Until and unless the attitude of the union is changed 1 consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely , it is the duty of the Tribunal to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides . Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/ union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit.
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit, the same is closed.
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared . However, though the management side appeared through their learned Advocate did not file their W.S. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 12-7-99 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workman failed to appear before this Tribunal , registered notices were issued to the workman side but inspite of the issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal. In natural course the question will arise what will be the fate of the reference is made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of the dispute raised by the concerned workman/union. Naturally responsibility rests with the concernedworkman/ union to assist the Tribunal to dispose of the reference on merit. In view of the decision or the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002 ( 94 ) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass ' No dispute ' Award when both the parties remain absent. There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer Printed by the Manager , Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Publishedby the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.