This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं०डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 7 ]

No. 7]

नई दिल्ली, फरवरी 8- फरवरी 14 , 2004, शनिवार/माघ 19-माथ 25, 1925

NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 8- FEBRUARY 14, 2004, SATURDAY/MAGHA MAGHA 25, 1925

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II-Section 3-Sub- section (ii ).

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

मंत्रिमंडल सचिवालय नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

1 }

का. आ. 298.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्री गौर सुन्दर मुखोपाध्याय, अधिवक्ता को विचारण न्यायालयों में निदेशक, केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के.अ.ब्यूरो ) द्वारा पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में नार्थ 24 परगना और साउथ 24 परगना में संस्थितमामलों के अभियोजन तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्यविषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[सं. 225/37/2002- डीएसपीई ] शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव

CABINET SECRETARIAT New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004 S. O. 298. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Pro- cedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government 357GI/2004

hereby appoints Shri Gour Sundar Mukhopadhyaya , Advocate as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting the prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment ( CBI ) in the State of West Bengal at North 24 Pargarias and South 24 parganas as entrusted to him by the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation , in the trial Courts and appeals/revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate Courts established. bylaw.

[No. 225/37/2002 -OSPE SHUBHA THAKUR, Unde: Secy..

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्वविभाग )

कार्यालय आयुक्त, केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क नागपुर, 22 दिसम्बर, 2003 सं. 1/2003-सीमा शुल्क ( एन.टी. )

का. आ. 299.- भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्त्र विभाग, नई दिल्ली के दिनांक 1 जुलाई, 1994 की अधिसूचना सं. 33/94 सी.शु. [ एन.टी. ] के तहत प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए,

(571) 572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

मै एत‌द्वारा गांव घोटरली ग्राम पंचायत वायगांव , तहसील उमरेर, जिला नागपुर [ महाराष्ट्र ] को विकास आयुक्त, एसईईपीजेड, विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्र , भारत सरकार, वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्रालय , अंधेरी ( पूर्व ) मुम्बई द्वारा अनुमोदित केवल 100 % निर्यात उन्मुख इकाई लगाने के उद्देश्य से सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 52 ) की धारा-9 के अधीन वेअर हाउसिंग स्टेशन घोषित करता हूं ।

[फा..सं. VIII ( सी.शु. ) 25-6/2003 ] ब्रजिन्दर सिंह, आयुक्त MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue)

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE

Nagpur, the 22nd December, 2003 No. 1/ 2003 - CUSTOMS (N.T. )

S. O. 299.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Notification No. 33 /94-Cus . (N.T. ) dated 1st July, 1994 of the Government of India , Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue, New Delhi , I hereby declare Village Ghoturli , Gram panchayat Waygaon , Tahsil Umrer, Distt . Nagpur in the state ofMaharashtra to be warehousing station under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) for the purpose of setting up of 100 % Export Oriented Undertak- ing only, approved by the Development Commissioner, SEEPZ , Special Economic Zone , Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Andheri (East) , Mumbai .

[ C. No. VIII (CUS. )25-6/2003 ] HARJINDER SINGH, Commissioner केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड नई दिल्ली, 19 दिसम्बर, 2003

(आयकर)

आ. आ. 300.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) काधरा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " इंडियन वीमेन सांइंटिस्ट एसोसिएशन , वाशी, नवी मुम्बई " को वर्ष 1997-98 से 1999- 2000 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: -

(i ) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगी जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- 'जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदिके रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii) ]

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगा, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक किऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग सेलेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv) कर-निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दीजाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 355 /2003/फा. सं. 197/ 5/98- आईटीए-1 ]

आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव

ر CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

New Delhi , the 19th December, 2003 (INCOME-TAX)

S. O. 300.-In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub-caluse ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Indian Women Scientist Association , Vashi , Navi Mumbai " for the purpose of the said Sub-clause for the assessment years 1997-98 to 1999-2000 subject to thefollowing conditions, namely :-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumu- late for application, wholly and exclusively to the object for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furni- ture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevent to the assessment years men- tioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub- sec- tion(5) ofSection 11;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of busi- ness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are main- tained in respect of such business ;

( iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of incomebefore the Income-tax authority in ac- cordance with the provisions of the Income- Tax Act, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assests will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 355/2003 /F. No. 197/5/98 - ITA- 1 ]

I. P. S. BINDRA , Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

573

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माष 25, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 19 दिसम्बर, 2003 (आयकर)

का. आ. 301.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " काउंसिल फार लेदर एक्सपोर्ट, चेन्नै" को वर्ष 1989-90 से 1991-1992 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(i ) कर-निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय.का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगी जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तककिऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दीजाएंगी।

[अधिसूचना सं. 356/2003/फा. सं. 197/141/2003- आईटीए-1 ] आई . पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th December, 2003

(INCOME-TAX)

S. O. 301. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub-clause ( iv) ofclause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Council for Leather Exports , Chennai " for the purpose of the said sub-clause for the assessment years 1989-90 to 1991-1992 subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumu- late for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewllery, furni- ture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years men- tioned above other wise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in Sub- section(5) ofSection 11;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusi- ness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are main- tained in respect of such business ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of incomebefore the Income -tax authority in ac- cordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assests will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 356/2003/F. No. 197/141 /2003- ITA- 1 ]; I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 19 दिसम्बर, 2003 (आयकर)

का. आ. 302.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा " जलियांवाला बाग नेशनल मैमोरियल ट्रस्ट, अमृतसर " को वर्ष 1998-99 से 2000-2001 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: -

(i ) कर -निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगी जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्‌देश्ये कीप्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे बरसेबार के संबंध में अलग सेलेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004 /MAGHA 25 , 1925

574

(iv) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

डाकघर - भांगर, जिला-24 परगना, पश्चिम बंगाल " को वर्ष 2000-01 से2001-02 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: - (v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दीजाएंगी।

(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगी जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

[अधिसूचना सं . 358/2003/फा. सं. 197/36/2003- आईटीए-1 ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th December, 2003

(INCOME- TAX)

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवासकेगा;

S. O. 302. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub-clause ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Jallianwalla Bagh National Memorial Trust, Amritsar " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 1998-1999 to 2000-2001 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) the assessee will apply its income, or accumu- late for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तककि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewllery, furni- ture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years men- tioned above otherwise than in anyone or more ofthe forms or modes specified in Sub - sec- tion (5) of Section 11 ;

[अधिसूचना सं . 359/2003/फा. सं. 197/150/2003 - आईटीए-1 ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव (iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of busi- ness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are main- tained in respect of such business ;

New Delhi , the 19th December, 2003 (INCOME-TAX)

(iv ) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in ac- cordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act , 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assests will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

S. O. 303. In exercise ofpowers conferred by the Sub-clause ( iv) ofclause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Southern Health Improvement Samity, P.O. Bhangar, Distt. 24 Parganas , West Bengal " for the purpose ofthe said sub -clause for the assessment years 2000-01 to 2001-02 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

[Notification No. 358 /2003/F. No. 197/36/2003-1TA - I ] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 19 दिसम्बर , 2003

(i) the assessee will apply its income, or accumu- late for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(आयकर)

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewllery, furni- ture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years का. आ. 303.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " सदर्न हेल्थइम्प्रूवमेंट समिति, 575 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in Sub- section (5) of Section 11;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उ‌द्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

( iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of incomebefore the Income-tax authority in ac- cordancewith the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961;

[अधिसूचना सं. 360/ 2003/फा. सं.: 197/202/2003- आईटीए-1 ] आई. पी.एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 20th December, 2003 (INCOME-TAX) S.O. 304. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub-clause ( iv) ofclause (23C) ofSection 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "His Holiness the Dalai Lama's Charitable Trust, New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub -clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-05 subject to the fol- lowing conditions , namely :-

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisationwith similar objectives.

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumu- late for application, wholly and exclusively to the object for which it is established ;

[Notification No. 359/2003 /F. No. 197/ 150/2003 - ITA -1 ] 1. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर, 2003 (आयकर)

( ii) the assessée will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewllery, furni- ture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevent to the assessment years men- tioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - sec- tion(5) of Section 11 ;

का.आ. 304.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 -ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " हिज होलिनेस द दलाई लामा चेरिटेबल ट्रस्ट, नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of busi- ness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessec and separate books of accounts are main- tained in respect of such business;

(i ) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax authority in ac- cordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assests will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives and no part ofthe same will go to any of the members of the Society.

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

[Notification No. 360/2003 /F. No. 197/ 202/2003-1TA- 1 ] 1. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 21 जनवरी , 2004 (आयकर)

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों कीप्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार केसंबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

का.आ. 305.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 -गं ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " नेशनल चिल्ड्रेन्स फण्ड, 5 , सीरी इंस्टीट्यूशनल एरिया, हौजखास, नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 1993- 1994से 1995-1996 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: - (iv ) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ;

(i ) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

and separate books of accounts are main- tained in respect of such business;

तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in ac- cordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assests will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

(ii) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगा , जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों कीप्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

[Notification No. 22/2004/F. No. 197/166/2003 -ITA- I ] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 21 जनवरी, 2004 (आयकर) का.आ. 306.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 -ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " कर्नाटक चीफ मिनिस्टर्स मेडिकल रिलीफ सोसायटी बंगलौर " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-05 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(i) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथाअनन्यतयां उन उ‌द्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

[ अधिसूचना सं. 22 / 2004/फा. सं. 197/166/2003- आईटीए-1 ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st January, 2004 (INCOME-TAX) S.O. 305. In exercise of powers conferred by the sub -clause ( iv ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "National Children's Fund , 5, Siri Institutional Area, Hauz Khas , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said

(ii) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

sub-clause for the assessment years 1993-1994 to 1995-

1996 subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumu- late for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहीं होगी , जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक किऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार केसंबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv.) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewllery, furni- ture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevent to the assessment years men- tioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - sec- tion ( 5) of Section 11;

[अधिसूचना सं. 23/2004/फा. सं. 197/191/2003- आईटीए-1 ]

आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव (iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of busi- ness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माष 25, 1925

577 New Delhi , the 21st January, 2004

(INCOME-TAX)

अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

S.O. 306.- In exercise of powers conferred by the sub-clause ( iv) ofclause ( 23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Karnataka Chief Minister's Medical Relief Society Bangalore" for the purpose of the said sub -clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumu- late for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी , जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furni- ture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevent to the assessment years men- tioned above otherwise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in Sub -sec- tion (5) of Section 11;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दीजाएंगी।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 26/2004/फा. सं. 197/165/ 2003- आईटीए-1 ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव (iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of busi- ness, unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are main- tained in respect of such business;

New Delhi, the 21st January, 2004 (INCOME-TAX)

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax Authority in accordance with the provisions ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assests will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

S. O. 307. In exercise of powers conferred by the sub -caluse ( iv) ofclause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ), the Central Government hereby notifiesthe "National Children's Fund, 5, Siri Institutional Area, Hauz Khas , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub-clause for the assessment years 1990-91 to 1992-93 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

[Notification No. 23/2004/F. No. 197/ 191 /2003 - ITA- I ] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

(i), the assessee will apply its income , or accumu- late for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

नई दिल्ली, 21 जनवरी, 2004

(आयकर)

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furni- ture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevent to the assessment years men- tioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - sec- tion(5) of Section 11 ;

का.आ. 307.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 -ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " नेशनल चिल्ड्रेन्स फण्ड, 5, सीरी इंस्टीट्यूशनल एरिया, हौजखास, नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 1990- 1991 से 1992-1993 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: -

(i) कर-निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथाअनन्यतया उन उ‌द्देश्यों के लिए करेगी जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ;

( ii) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income- tax Authority in accordance with the provisions ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961;

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004 /MAGHA 25, 1925

578

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 26/2004/F. No. 197 /165/2003 - ITA-I ]

I. P. S. BINDRA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2004 (आयकर)

का.आ. 308.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " सर्व सेवा संघ, सेवा ग्राम, वर्धा (महाराष्ट्र) " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्: -

(i ) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उ‌द्देश्यों के लिए करेगी जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उ‌द्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसें कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरंणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

[अधिसूचना सं. 31/2004/फा. सं. 197/177/2003- आईटीए-1 ]

आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 28th January, 2004

(INCOME-TAX)

S.O. 308. In exercise of powers conferred by the sub-caluse ( iv ) ofclause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- TaxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

notifies the " Sarva Seva Sangh, Sevagram , Wardha (Maharashtra) " for the purpose of the said sub-clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumu- late for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii ) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received andmaintained in the form ofjewellery, furni- ture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevent to the assessment years men- tioned above otherwise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in sub-sec- tion(5) of Section 11;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-Tax Authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- Tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 31 /2004/F. No. 197/ 177/2003 - ITA- I ] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2004 (आयकर )

का.आ. 309.-सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नामके सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संघ " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है :-

(i ) अधिसूचित संगठन ने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रख- रखाव करेगी;

(ii) अधिसूचित संगठन प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गतिविधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव , वैज्ञानिक और औद्यौगिक अनुसंधान विभाग " टेक्नोलाजी भवन " न्यू महरोली रोड़ , नई दिल्ली-110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

(iii ) अधिसूचित संगठन केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोदिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने 579

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) 10 मिडिलटन रो, पांचवां तल, कलकत्ता-700071 ( ख ) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर, को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी ।

क्रम सं. अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम अवधिजिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है 1.

1-4-2003 से 31-3-2006 मैसर्स विजन रिसर्च फाउंडेशन, 18कालेज रोड, चेन्नई-600006

टिप्पणी.-( i ) उपर्युक्त शर्त ( i ) " संघ " के रूप में श्रेणीबद्ध संगठन पर लागूनहींहोगी ।

( ii ) अधिसूचित संस्था को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक (छूट ) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 33/2004/फा. सं. 203/124/2003- आयकर नि.- II ] संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.- II ) New Delhi , the 28th January, 2004 (INCOME- TAX)

S.O. 309. It is hereby notified for general informa- tion that the organisation mentioned below has been approved by the Central Government for the period men- tioned below, for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub - section (1) of section 35 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income tax Rules , 1962 under the category "Association " subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The notified organisation shall maintain sepa- rate books of accounts for its research activi- ties;

( ii) The notified organisation shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific & research ac- tivities to the Secretary, Department of Scien- tific and Industrial Research , ' Technology Bhawan' , New Mehrauli Road , New Delhi- 110016 for every fnancial year on or before 31stMay of each year;

357 GI/04-2

(iii) The notified organisation shall submit, on behalf of the Central Government, to (a) the DirectorGeneral of Income tax (Exemptions) , 10 Middleton Row, 5th Floor, Calcutta - 700071 (b) the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research , and (c) the Commissioner of Income Tax/ Director of Income Tax (exemptions ) having jurisdiction over the organisation, on or before the 31st October each year, a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income and Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted Sub-section ( I) of Section 35 of Income Tax Act , 1961 in additionto the return of IncomeTax to the designated assessing officer .

S. No. Name of the organisation Period for which approved notification is effective

1-4-2003 to 3 1-3-2006 1. M/ sVision Research Foundation , 18 , College Road, Chennai - 600006

Notes . ( i ) Condition ( i ) above will not apply to the organisation categorized as " Association" (ii) The notified Institution is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income Tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions ) having jurisdiction . Three copics of the application for renewal of approval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

[Notification No. 33/2004/F. No. 203 / 124/2003 - ITA - II ] SANGEETA GUPTA, Director ( ITA- II ) नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2004 (आयकर )

का.आ. 310.-सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अयं अभूचितं किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन का उसके नाम केसामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संघ " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है :-

(ii ) अधिसूचित संगठन प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिकअनुसंधान गतिविधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और

L 580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग " टेक्नोलॉजी भवन " न्यू महरोली रोड, नई दिल्ली-110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

( iii ) अधिसूचित संगठन केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोदिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों , जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की, भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) 10 मिडिलटन रो , पांचवां तल, कलकत्ता -70007; ( ख ) सचिव वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर, को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी ।

क्रम सं. अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम अवधिजिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है 1.

1-4-2003 से

31-3-2006 मैसर्स विवेकानन्द मेडीकल रिसर्च सोसायटी, विद्या नगर, लाटूर-413512

( ii ) अधिसूचित संघ को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/ आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव , वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 32/2004/फा. सं. 203/76/2003- आयकर नि.- II ]

संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि. - 11) New Delhi , the 28th January, 2004 (INCOME-TAX)

S.O. 310. It is hereby notified for general nformation that the organisation mentioned below has been approved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below, for purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income- Tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income Tax Rules , 1962 under the category "Association" subject to the following conditions :---

(i ) The notified organisation shall maintain separate books of accounts for its research activities;

( ii ) The notified organisation shall furnish the Annual return of its scientific research

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] activities to the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, " Technology Bhawan' , New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi- 1100 16 for every fnancial year on or before the 31st May of each year ,

(iii) The notified organisation shall submit, on behalf of the Central Government , to ( a) the Director General of Income tax (Exemptions ) , 10Middleton Row, 5th Floor , Calcutta-700071 (b) the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, and (c) the Commissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (exemptions) having jurisdiction over the organisation, on or before the 31st October each year , a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income tax Act , 1961 in addition to the return of Income tax to the designated assessing officer.

S.No. Name of the organisation approved

Period for which notification is effective

1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 M/sVivekanand Medical research Society, Vidya Nagar , Latur-413512

Notes.(i ) Condition ( i ) above will not apply to the organisation categorized as " Association" :

(ii) The notified Association is advised to apply intriplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction . Three copies of the application for renewal of approval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

[Notification No. 32/2004/F. No. 203 /76/2003 - ΓΤΑ - 11 ] SANGEETA GUPTA, Director (ITA- II ) नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004. (आयकर)

का.आ. 311.-सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

581 उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है :-

Income tax Rules , 1962 under the category " Institution" subject to the following conditions :-

(i) The notified Institution shall maintain separate books of accounts for its research activities ;

( i ) अधिसूचित संस्था अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रख- रखाव करेगी;

( ii ) अधिसूचित संस्था प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिकअनुसंधान गति- विधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्यौगिक अनुसंधान विभाग " टेक्नोलाजी भवन " न्यू महरोली रोड, नई दिल्ली -110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

(ii) The notified Institution shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, ' Technology Bhawan' , New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi- 110016 for every financial year on or before the 31st May of each year;

(iii) अधिसूचित संस्था केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोदिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) 10 मिडिलटन रो , पांचवां तल, कलकत्ता-700071 ( ख ) सचिव वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर, को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी ।

क्रम सं . अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम

( iii) The notified Institution shall submit, on behalf ofthe Central Government, to ( a ) the Director General of Income tax (Exemptions) , 10 MiddletonRow, 5th Floor, Calcutta-700071 (b) the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, and (c) the Commissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction over the organisation, on or before the 31st October each year, a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of Income tax to the designated assessing officer.

अवधिजिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है

1 .

मैसर्स आई रिसर्च सेंटर, 19 ,

S.No. Name of the organisation approved

1-4-2002 से 31-3-2005

कैथडरल रोड,

Period for which notification is effective चेन्नई -600086

1 . M/ sEye Research Centre , 1-4-2002 to 31-3-2005 19, Cathedral Road, Chennai -600086

टिप्पणी.-अधिसूचित संस्था को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक (छूट ) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी ।

Notes. The notified Institution is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions ) having jurisdiction. Three copies of the application for renewal of approval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

[ अधिसूचना सं. 35/2004/फा. सं. 203/129/2003- आयकर नि.- II ] संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.- II )

[Notification No. 35/2004/F. No. 203 / 129/ 2003 - ITA- II ] New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004

SANGEETA GUPTA, Director (ITA -II ) (INCOME-TAX)

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी, 2004 (आयकर )

S.O.311 . It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has been approved bythe Central Government for the period mentioned below, for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub - section ( 1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the

का.आ. 312.- सोमान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

582

NewDelhi, the 30th January, 2004

(INCOME-TAX)

नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है:-

(i) अधिसूचित संस्था अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रख- रखाव करेगी;

S.O. 312. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has been approved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below, for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub- section ( 1) of section 35 of the Income - tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income -tax Rules, 1962 under the category "Institution " subject to the following conditions :-

(i) The notified Institution shall maintain separate books of accounts for its research activities;

(ii ) अधिसूचित संस्था प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिकअनुसंधान गति- विधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्यौगिक अनुसंधान विभाग " टेक्नोलाजी भवन " न्यू महरोली रोड़ , नई दिल्ली-110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

(ii) The notified Institution shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary, Department of Scientific& Industrial Research, "Technology Bhawan' , New Mehrauli Road , New Delhi- 110016 for every financial year on or before 31stMay of each year;

( iii) अधिसूचित संस्था केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोदिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) 10 मिडिलटन रो, पांचवां तल, कलकत्ता -700071 ( ख ) सचिव वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर, को अपना उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी ।

(iii) The notified Institution shall submit, on behalf ofthe Central Government , to ( a) the Director General of Income-tax (Exemptions ) , 10 Middleton Row, 5th Floor, Calcutta-700071 (b) the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, and (c) the Commissioner of Income- tax/Director of Income- tax (Exemptions ) having jurisdiction over the organisation, on or before the 31st October each year, a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income-tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of Income-tax to the designated assessing officer.

क्रम सं . अन्नत संगठन का नाम अवधिजिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है

1-4-2002से

S. No. Name of the organisation approved

Period for which notification is effective 31-3-2005

1-4-2002 to 31-3-2005 1. मैसर्स सेंट्रल पावर रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट, पोस्ट बाक्स नं. 8066ए प्रो. सर सी.वी. रमन रोड, सदाशिवनगर सब पोस्ट आफिस, बंगलौर-560080

1. M/sCentral Power Research institute , P.B. No. 8066 , Prof. Sir , C.V. Raman Road, Sadashiv- nagar Sub Post Office, Bangalore-560080

टिप्पणी.- अधिसूचित संस्था को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव , वैज्ञानिक और औद्यौगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी ।

Notes. The notified Institution is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income-tax/Director of Income tax(Exemptions) having jurisdiction . Three copies ofthe application for renewal of approval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research .

[अधिसूचना सं. 34/2004/फा. सं. 203/107/2003 - आयकर नि.- II ]

[Notification No. 34/2004/F. No. 203/107/2003 - ITA - II ] SANGEETA GUPTA , Director (ITA -II ) संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.- II) [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

583 नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

(आयकर)

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income beforethe Income-tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income-tax Act , 1961;

का.आ. 313.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 की 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " भारतीय भाषा परिषद , कोलकाता " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[NotificationNo. 36/2004/F . No. 197/ 183/2003-ITA-I] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

( i) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ;

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी, 2004 (आयकर )

( ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक -ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदिके रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा ;

का. आ. 314.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 की43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " हरियाणा चीफ मिनिस्टर्स वार हीरोज रिलीफ फण्ड, पंचकुला " को वर्ष 1999-2000 से 2001-2002 के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंडके प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: -

( i) कर- निर्धारित अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगी जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी , जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों कीप्राप्तिके लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पतियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी।

( ii ) कर - निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा ;

[ अधिसूचना सं. 36/2004/फा० सं० 197/183/2003- आईटीए-1 ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004 (INCOME TAX)

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्तिके लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा,;

S.O. 313. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub-clause ( iv) ofClause ( 23C ) of Section 10 ofthe Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Bhartiya Bhasha Parishad, Kolkata " for the purpose of the said Sub -clause for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

[अधिसूचना सं. 38/2004/फा० सं० 197/198/2003 - आईटीए -1 ]

आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004

(INCOME TAX)

S.O. 314. In exercise ofpowers conferredby Sub- clause ( iv) ofClause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income - tax (ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (otherthan voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub -section ( 5) of Section 11;

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

584

CENTRAL ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE BUREAU

ORDER

New Delhi , the 4th February, 2004

Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "Haryana Chief Minister's War Heroes ' Relief Fund, Panchkula " for the purpose of the said Sub-clause for the assessment years 1999-2000 to 2001-2002 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i ) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in Sub- section (5) of Section 11 ;

S.O. 315. Whereas the Joint Secretary to the Government of India , specially empowered under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (52 of 1974 ) issued Order F.No. 673/9/2003 -Cus . VIII , dated 17-10-2003 under the said Sub- section directing that Shri Ashok Kumar F. Jain@ Ashok P. Jain , R/o No. 107-B, Anju Apartments , First Floor, Kulupwadi , Near National Park, Borivilli East, Mumbai - 400066 be detained and kept in custody in the Central Prison, Mumbai with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the augmentation of foreign exchange in future.

2. Whereas the Central Government has reasons to believe that the aforesaid person has absconded or is concealing himself so that the order cannot be executed.

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business, unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordancewith the provisions of the Income -tax Act , 1961 ;

3. Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (b) of Sub- section ( I ) of Section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs the aforesaid person to appear before the Commissioner of Police , Mumbai within 7 days of the publication of this order in the Official Gazette .

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[NotificationNo. 38/2004/F.No . 197 / 198/2003 - ITA- 1 ]

I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

[F. No. 673/09/2003 -Cus. -VIII ] N. RAJAGOPALAN, Under Secy. ( COFEPOSA) ( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग )

(बैंकिंग प्रभाग )

सेन्ट्रल इकॉनॉमिक इन्टेलीजैन्स ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी, 2004

का. आ. 315.-अतः संयुक्त सचिव , भारत सरकार जिन्हें विदेशी मुद्रा संरक्षण और तस्करी निवारण अधिनियम, 1974 ( 1974 का 52 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत विशेष रूप से शक्ति प्रदान की गई है, ने उक्त उप - धारा के अधीन आदेश फाइल सं . 673/ 09/2003 - सी.यू.एस. VIII , दिनांक17-10-2003 को जारी किया और यह निर्देश दिया कि श्री अशोक कुमार एफ. जैन @ अशोक पी . जैन, निवास सं. 107 - बी, अंजू अपार्टमेन्ट्स, प्रथम तल, कुलूपवडी, नेशनल पार्क के नजदीक, वोरीविली पूर्व, मुम्बई-400066 को निरुद्ध कर लिया जाए और केन्द्रीय कारागार, मुम्बई में अभिरक्षा में रखा जाए ताकि उन्हें भविष्य में चीजों की तस्करी करने से रोका जा सके ।

का. आ. 316. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970 के खण्ड 3 के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) और खण्ड 8 के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) , अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड ( क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा , श्री के ० रत्नाकर हेगड़े. जो इस समय विजया बैंक में महाप्रबंधक हैं, को उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने कीतारीख से 30-4-2006 अर्थात् जिस माह में वह अधिवार्पिता की आयु प्राप्त करेंगे , उसके अंतिम दिन तक की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, यूनियन बैंक आफ इंडिया के पूर्णकालिक निदेशक ( कार्यपालक निदेशक के रूप में पदनामित ) के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा०सं० 9/5/ 2003- बीओ -1 ] 2. अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार के पास यह विश्वास करने का कारण है किपूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति फरार हो गया है या स्वयं को छिपा रखा है जिससे यह आदेश निष्पादित नहीं किया जा सकता ।

**डी० चौधरी , अवर सचिव

(Department of Economic Affairs) (Banking Division) New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004 3. अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्ति का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एदद्वारा पूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति को यह निर्देश देती है कि वह शासकीय राजपत्र में इस आदेश के प्रकाशित होने के 7 दिन के भीतर पुलिस आयुक्त, मुम्बई के सम्मुख उपस्थित हो ।

S.O. 316. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970 , read with Sub- clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3 and [फा० सं० 673/09/2003 - सी.यू.एस.- VIII ] एन. राजागोपालन , अवर सचिव ( कोफेपोसा ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

585

New Delhi , the 5th January, 2004 Sub-clause ( 1 ) of Clause 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri K. Rathnakar Hegde, presently General Manager, VijayaBank as awhole time director (designated as the Executive Director ) of Union Bank of India with effect from the date of taking charge of the post and upto 30-4-2006 i.e. the last day of the month in which he would attain the age of superannuation or until further orders whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 9/5/2003 -B.O. IJ D. CHOUDHURY, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी, 2004

S.O. 318. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (a) ofSub-section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with sub-clause ( I ) of clause 3 and sub -clause ( 1 ) of clause 8 ofthe Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri M. Balachandran , presently General Manager, Bank of Baroda as a whole time director (designated as the Executive Director) of Bank of India with effect from the date of his taking charge ofthe post and upto 30-4-2007 i.e. the last dayof the month in which he would attain the age of superannuation oruntil further orders whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 9/17/2003-В.О. Г RAMESH CHAND , Under Secy.

रसायन एवं उर्वरक मंत्रालय

(उर्वरकविभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 317.-29 सितम्बर, 2003 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अधिक्रमण में एवं मंत्रिमंडल नियुक्ति समिति के अनुमोदनके परिणामस्वरूप, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने भारतीय औद्योगिक विकास बैंक ( आईडीबीआई ) के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबन्ध निदेशक के पद का अतिरिक्त कार्य भार दिनांक1-10-2003 से 31-5-2004 तक भारतीय यूनिट ट्रस्ट के अध्यक्ष श्री एम ० दामोदरन को सौंपने कानिर्णय लिया है ।

[फा० सं० 24 (4)/2003- आईएफ-1 ] बी०डी० बेरवाल, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 4th February, 2004

का.आ. 319.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा " संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग " नियम 1976 के नियम 10 के उप - नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में रसायन एवं उर्वरक मंत्रालय, उर्वरक विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण में आने वाले निम्नलिखित कार्यालय, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक अर्थात् शत - प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को अधिसूचित करती है:-

1. राष्ट्रीय केमिकल्स एण्ड फर्टिलाइजर्स लिमिटेड, विपणन कार्यालय, विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश ।

2. राष्ट्रीय केमिकल्स एण्ड फर्टिलाइजर्स लिमिटेड, विपणन कार्यालय, वैझाग , विशाखापट्टणम, आंध्र प्रदेश ।

S.O. 317. In supersession of the notification of even number dated September 29 , 2003 and consequent upon the approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet, the Central Government have decided to entrust the additional charge of the post of Chairman and Managing Director, Industrial Development of Bank of India ( IDBI ) to Shri M. Damodaran , Chairman, Unit Trust of India, with effect from 01-10-2003 to 31-05-2004.

3. राष्ट्रीय केमिकल्स एण्ड फर्टिलाइजर्स लिमिटेड, विपणन कार्यालय, निजामाबाद, आंध्र प्रदेश ।

[F. No. 24(4) 2003 -IF -I]

[संख्या ई -11011/1/2001-हिन्दी] B.D. BERWAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी, 2004

बलविन्दर कुमार, संयुक्त सचिव

MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS (Department of Fertilizers)

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2004

S. O. 319. In pursuance of sub - rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language " Use for official purposes of the Union " Rule 1976 the Central Govt. hereby notifies the following offices, under the Administrative Control of the Ministry ofChemicals &Fertilizers, Department ofFertilizers more than 80 % i.e. , 100% staffwhere of have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi

1. Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited, Vijayawara, Andhra Pradesh.

2. Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited, Vizag, Vishakhapattnam , Andhra Pradesh

का.आ. 318.-राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम , 1970 के खण्ड 3 के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) और खण्ड 8 के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) , अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा (3 ) के खण्ड (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा , श्री एम ० बालचन्द्रन, जो इस समय बैंक आफ बड़ौदा में महाप्रबंधक हैं, को उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 30-4-2007 अर्थात् जिस माह में वह अधिवार्षिता की आयु प्राप्त करेंगे , उसके अंतिम दिन तक की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, बैंक आफ इंडिया के पूर्णकालिक निदेशक ( कार्यपालक निदेशक के रूप में पदनामित ) के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

3. Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers , Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh .

[No. E- 11011/1 /2001 -Hindi ] BALVINDER KUMAR, Jt. Secy.

[फा. सं. 9/17/2003- बीओ -1 ] रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

586

उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 29 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 320.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स आर ए आर माइक्रो इक्विपमेन्ट प्रा ० लि० , 23 , अष्टलक्ष्मी नगर, सुन्दरपुरम , कोयम्बटूर -24 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित " एक्सल-1000 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी मीटर के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्सेल " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/03 /420 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

ENRE METER

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त अनाचार के लिए उपकरण को पल्स जनरेटर, केबल और किराया मीटर को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सोलबन्दी की जाएगी ।

उक्तमॉडल एक टैक्सी किराया मीटर है जिसमें दूरी और समय मापक युक्ति सहित अंकक सूचन समाविष्ट है । यह निरंतर योग करता है तथा यात्रा के किसी क्षण में किराया और यात्री द्वारा संदेय प्रभार उपदर्शित करता है । संदेय किराया कतिपय गति से ऊपर तय की गई दूरी और अनुबंधित यात्रा के दौरान उस गति से नीचे लगे समय का फलक है । सात खंडीय प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोग ( एल ई डी ) द्वारा मीटर पठन उपदर्शित किया जाता है और विद्युत प्रदाय डी सी 12 वी है । मीटर का " के " कारक 980 स्पंद/कि.मि. है ।

[फा० सं० डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 199 )/2002 ] पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 587 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 29th January, 2004

S.O. 320. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use, and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of a Taxi Meter with digital indication of ' EXCEL- 1000 ' series with brand name " EXCEL" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . R.A.R Micro Equipment Pvt . Ltd. , 23 , Astalakshmi Nagar, Sundrapuram, Coimbatore- 24 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/03/420 ;

In addition to stamping plate , the sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the pulse generator , cable and the fare meter for malpractice .

The said model is a Taxi Meter with digital indication incorporated with a distance and time measuring device . It totalizes continuously and indicates at any moment of the journey, the charges payable by the passenger . The fare to pay is a function of the distance travelled above a certain specified speed and the time elapsed below that specified speed during the journey. The reading of the meter is indicated by seven segment Light Emitting Diode (LED ) and power supply isDC 12V. The ' K' factor is 980 pulses/km.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 199)/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 357 G1/04-3 588

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 29 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 321.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 )और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एवरेस्टस्केल्स कं ० , 1225 , द्विची रोड, कोयम्बटूर -641 013 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " ई जे- टी टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एवरेस्ट" है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /380 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमाडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित प्रकार का अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 25 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 500 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी की जाती है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता ८० कि. ग्रा . तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जसरी अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. चत्र " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में है और 100 मि. ग्रा. से अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 30.00 की रेंज में है और जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 ×10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा ० सं० डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 175 )/ 2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

589

New Delhi , the 29th January, 2004

S. O. 321. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards ofWeights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and ( 8) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate ofapproval of the self indicating , non-automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EJ - TT " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "EVEREST" (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s Everest Scales Co. , 1225 , Trichi Road, Coimbatore- 641 013 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/380;

ThesaidModel (See the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 6 kg and minimum capacity of 25g. The verification scale interval (e) is 500) mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of the said section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 5t) kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of5,000 to 50,000 for ' c ' value of more than 100 mg and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

{ F. No. WM - 21 ( 175 )/2002 ]

P. A KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 590

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 29 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 322.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेकालटेक इन्सट्रूमेन्टस गंभ, जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटिजन स्क्रेल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन, मलाड ( पूर्व ) मुंबई -400 097 द्वारा विपणित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " सी जी-4102 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिटिजन स्केलटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003 /451 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक चुम्बकीय सेंसर भार सेल आधारित , अधिकतम क्षमता 4100 ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्रा . सहित तोलन उपकरण है सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंदी की गई है।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घापणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा . या उसके अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 से अन्यून सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल (एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं , और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2×10 या 5 × 10 * है जिसमें धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा० सं० डब्ल्यूएम-21 (343 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 591 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माष 25, 1925

New Delhi , the 29th January, 2004

S. O. 322. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic, (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CG-4102 " series of special accuracy (aссигасу class-I) and with brand name " CITIZEN- SCALETECH" ( herein referred to as the Model) , manufactured by M/s Secaltech Instruments Gmbh , Germany and marketed by M/ s . Citizen Scales ( I ) Pvt . Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building , Gaushala Lane, Malad (East ) Mumbai -400 097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /451;

The said model ( figure given below) is a magnetic censor ldad cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 4100 g and minimum capacity of 1g . The verification scale interval (e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate, the sealing is to be done to prevent the opening ofthe machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of the said section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number verification scale interval (n) not less than 50,000 and ' e ' value of 1 mg or more with ' e' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10% , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , accuracy design and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (343)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 592

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 29 जनवरी, 2004

का०आ ० 323.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेकालटेक इन्सट्रमेन्टस गंभ, जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटिजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन , मलाड ( पूर्व ) मुंबई -400097 द्वारा विपणित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " सी जी-312 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिटिजन स्केलटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल, कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/452 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक चुम्बकीय सेंसर भार सेल आधारित, अधिकतम क्षमता 310 ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. सहित तोलन उपकरण है सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम ठपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी : स्टापिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंदी कीगई है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उचकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं, और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य है ।

[फा० सं ० डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 343 ) /2001 ] पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/मांघ 25, 1925

593

New Delhi , the 29th January, 2004

S. O. 323. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, issatisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating,non- automatic , ( Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CG - 312 " series of High accuracy (accuracy class- II ) and with brand name " CITIZEN - SECALTEC" (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s Secaltec Instruments Gmbh, Germany and marketed by M/ s . Citizen Scales (I ) Pvt Limited, 3, Pushpanjali Building, Gaushala Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai -400 097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/452;

The said model (See the figure given below) is a magnetic censorccensor load cell based weighing instruinent with a maximum capacity of310g and minimum capacity of200 mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 hertz alternate current power supply .

Sealing :In addition to sealing the stamping plate, the sealing is done to prevent the opening ofthe machine to avoid fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number ofverification scale interval ( n) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (343)/2001 ]

P.A: KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

594

नई दिल्ली, 29 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 324.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णितः मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेकालटेक इन्सट्रूमेन्ट्स गंभ, जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटिजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3, पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन, मलाड ( पूर्व ) मुंबई-400097 द्वारा विपणित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " सी टी -503 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिटिजन स्केलटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/453 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक चुम्बकीय सेंसर भार सेल आधारित , अधिकतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. सहित तोलन उपकरण हैं । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बंद करते के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंदी की गई है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं, और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा० सं ० डब्ल्यूएम-21 (343 )/2001 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 595 भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 29th January, 2004

S. O. 324. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic, (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "CT -503 " series of High accuracy (Accuracy class- II ) and with brand name " CITIZEN - SECALTEC" (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s Secaltec Instruments Gmbh, Germany and marketed by M/s . Citizen Scales (1) Pvt . Limited, 3, Pushpanjali Building , Gaushala Lane, Malad (East ) Mumbai -400 097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/453;

The said model (figure given below) is a magnetie censor load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 100g and minimum capacity of 200 mg. The verification seale interval (e) is 10 mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The liquid crystal diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 hertz alternate current power supply.

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being ofthe positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design, accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved said model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (343)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director ofLegal Metrology 357 GI/04-4 596

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004 /MAGHA 25 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 325.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेकालटेक इन्स्ट्रूमेन्ट्स गंभ , जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटिजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3, पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग, गौशाला लेन, मलाड ( पूर्व ) मुंबई-400097 द्वारा विपणित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस एस एच -83 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक मृचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिटिजन-स्केलटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिस अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डीं/ 09 / 2003 / 454 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करतीहै;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक चुम्बकीय सेंसर भार सेल आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 35 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. सहित तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका संत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तीलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धरा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्दी कीगई है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उमी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरणं भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उस से अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या माळत 50 कि. ग़ा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 ×10 . 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक या अन्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. ए . - 21 ( 343 ) /2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक विधिक माप विज्ञान 597 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

New Delhi , the 29th January , 2004

S.O. 325. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

な Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non- automatic, (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SSH - 83 " series of High accuracy (Accuracy class II) and with brand name " CITIZEN - SECALTEC " (herein referred to as the Model ), manufactured by M/s. Secaltec Instruments Gmbh, Germany and marketed by M/ s. Citizen Scales ( 1 ) Pvt Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building , Gaushała Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai -400 097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2003/ 454 ;

The said Model ( figure given below) is a magnetic censor load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 35kg and minimum capacity of 50g .The verification scale interval (e) is 1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply.

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub-section ( 12) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model s . all also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value I × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved said Model has beer manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 343 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 598

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 29 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 326.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत्त रिसोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मामक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेकालटेक इन्स्ट्रूमेन्ट्स गंभ, जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटिजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग, गौशाला लेन, मलाड ( पूर्व ) मुंबई-400097 द्वारा विपणित विशेष ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 , ) यथार्थता वाले " सी वाई -204 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिटिजन स्केलटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन बिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/455 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक चुम्बकीय सेंसर भार सेल आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 210 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि. ग्रा. सहित तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमाम अन्तराल ( ई ) का सान 1 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रष क्रिस्टल डायीड़ प्रद्दर्श नोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरणे 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी की जाती है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे हा मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " माम के लिए 50,000 से अन्यून सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 343 ) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

599

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

New Delhi , the 29th January, 2004

S.O. 326. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non -automatic , (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CY- 204 " series of special accuracy (Accuracy Class I ) and with brand name "CITIZEN - SCALE TECH " ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ), manufactured by M/s.Secaltec Instruments Gmbh, Germany and marketedby M/ s . Citizen Scales ( 1) Pvt . Limited. 3 , Pushpanjali Building, Gaushala Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai -400 097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/455;

The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type based dual range weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 210g and minimum capacity of 100mg. The verification scale interval (e) is Ig. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply.

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, acoaccuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) not less than to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg or more and with 'e' value 1x 10, 210 of the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero mamfactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, accuracy, design and with the same materials with which , the approved said Mudol has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM-21 (343 )/2001]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrologý [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/ MAGHA 25 , 1925

नई दिल्ली , 29 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 327.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है क़ि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेकालटेक इन्स्ट्रूमेन्टस गंभ, जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटिजन स्केल्स ( ओई) प्रा . लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन, मलाड ( पूर्व ) मुंबई -400097 द्वारा विपणित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) वाले " सी एक्स -220 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिटिजन स्केलटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2003 /456 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक चुम्बकीय सेंसर भार सेल आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि. ग्रा. सहित तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 से अन्यून सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक यः शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 ( 343 ) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान

فر [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ] ,

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

601

New Delhi , the 29th January, 2004

S.O. 327. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non- automatic, (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CX - 220 " series of special accuracy (Accuracy class I) and with brand name " CITIZEN - SCALETECH " ( herein referred to as the todel ) , manufactured by M/ s . Secaltec Instruments Gmbh , Germany and marketed by M/ s . Citizen Scales ( I ) Pvt. Limited , 3 , Pushpanjali Building, Gaushala Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai -400 097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2003/456;

The said modci ( figure given) is a magnetic censor load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of220g and minimum capacity of 100mg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1 mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230Volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Sealing: In addition to scaling the stamping plate , the scaling is done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices. 4 Further in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) not less than 50,000 and ` e` value of Img or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10* , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero. manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, accuracy, design and with the same materials with which, the approved said Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (343 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 602

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 29 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ.. -केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मोंडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

i अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेकालटेक इन्स्ट्रमेन्टस गंभ, जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटिजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन , मलाड़ (पूर्व ) मुंबई-40009 % द्वारा विपणित विशेष यथार्थ ( यथार्थता वर्ग- I.) वाले " एस एस एच -94 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिटिजन स्केलटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनु‌मोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2003 /457 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक चुम्बकीय सेंसर भार सेल आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 ग्रा. सहित तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 0.1 मि. ग्रा. है। इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी कीगई है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 से अन्यून सत्यापन मान अंतराल (एन) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं जिसमें ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 343 ) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 603 भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14 , 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 29th January, 2004

S.O. 328. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic , (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SSH - 94 " series of special accuracy (Accuracy class I ) and with brand name " CITIZEN - SCALETECH " ( herein referred to as the imodel ) , manufactured by M/s . Secaltec Instruments Gnch, Germany and marketed by M/ s . Citizen Scales (1 ) Pvt Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building , Gaushala Lane , Malad (East) Mumbai - 400 097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 2003 / 457;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a magnetic censor load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of 10g.The verification scale interval (e ) is 0. 1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate, the sealing is done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make . accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) not less than 50,000 and ' e' value of 1mg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , k, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , accuracy , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 (343 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 357G1/04-5 604

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 329.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अनेकड इंस्ट्रूमेंन्टस प्रा. लि. , पी ओ बाक्स सं. 8330 , 31 उजागर इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, डब्ल्यू पी टी रोड, दनार मुंबई-400088 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एम एक्स " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अनेकड " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /205 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक वैद्युत चुम्बकीय क्षेत्र बल प्रतिकर प्रकार का सेंसर आधारित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । संप्रदर्श यूनिट प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रकार का है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्दी की गई है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तकः " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 298 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

605 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004

stes the S. O. 329. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of, non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with " MX" series belonging to high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " Anamed " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Anamed Instruments Pvt . Ltd , P. O. Box No. 8330 , 31 , Ujagar Industrial Estate, W. T. P. Road, Deonar , Mumbai -400088 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/205;

Thesaid model is a electromagnetic field force compensation type sensor based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) cell with digital indication of maximum capacity 500g , minimum capacity 200mg and belonging to high accuracy class ( accuracy class - II ) . The value ofverification scale interval ' e ' is 10mg . The display unit is of light emitting diode (LED) type . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz altermative power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing may also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for avoid fraudulent practices.

Further in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of the same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with the number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range 500 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 100nig or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F..No . WM - 21 ( 298 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] 606

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 330.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा( 8 ) और उपधार। ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अनाभेद इंस्ट्रूमेंन्टस प्रा. लि. , पी ओ बाक्स सं. 8330, 31 उजागर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, डब्ल्यूपी टी रोड, देवनगर मुंबई -400088 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग -11 वाले " एम " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अनाभेद " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 206 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विद्युत चुम्बकीय क्षेत्रबल प्रतिकर टाइप सेंसर आधारित अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) मेल है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. और उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) का है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी की जा सकेगी ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे * मेक, स्थार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में अन्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल नकी संख्या 50 कि. ग्रा. तक कि अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या अणांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 298 ) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 607

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग !!- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004

S.O. 330. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of, non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with " M " series belonging to high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " Anamed " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s. Anamed Instruments Pvt. Ltd , P. O. Box No. 8330 , 31 , Ujagar Industrial Estate, W. T. P. Road, Deonar, Mumbai -400 088 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 206;

The said model is a electromagnetic field force compensation type sensor based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) cell with digital indication of maximum capacity 300g , minimum capacity 200mg and belonging to high accuracy class (accuracy class - II ), The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 10mg. The display unit is of light emitting diode (LED) type. The instruments operates on 230v, 50Hz alterative power supply.

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing may also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

M -Sarnev

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrumenis of similar make, accuracy and performance of the same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg arid with the number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range 500 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (298)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 331.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स काल- ऑन इंस्टूमेंन्ट प्रा. लि. , सं. 16-51/1 , प्रशान्त नगर, सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के सामने, उप्पल रोड, हैदराबाद -39 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -II ) वाले " सी एल- टीटी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल 'क्रा, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कालऑन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/308 समनुदेशित किया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत मापी भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलानात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील - बन्दी कीजाती है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 की रेंज में है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 x 10 के या 5 × 10 के के, है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 216 ) /2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

609 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004

S.O. 331. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the self indicating , non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CL - TT " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II) and with brand name " CAL - ON " ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Cal -On Instruments Pvt . Ltd , No. 16-51/ 1 , Prasant Nagar, Opp . Survey of India . Uppal Road , Hyderabad - 39 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 308:

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternativc current power supply.

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further in excrcise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Govemnien hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cor the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of the same series with maximum capacity up to g with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000) for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' c ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design, accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

F. No. WM - 21 ( 216)/20021

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 610

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 332. - केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स काल- ऑन इंस्ट्रूमेंन्ट, प्रा. लि. , सं. 16-51/ 1 , प्रशान्त नगर, सर्वे आफ इंडिया के सामने , उप्पल रोड़ हैदराबाद -39 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग - II ) वाले " सी एल- बी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " काल ऑन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/309 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत मापी भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्तिहैजिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए, मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी कीजाती हैं।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा और 150 कि.ग्रा. के बीच के रेंज में है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 216 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 611 भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th January , 2004

S.O. 332. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approvalof Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the self indicating , non - automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CL -B " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " CAL - ON " ( herein referred to as the Model ), manufactured by M/s Cal - On Instruments Pvt. Ltd , No. 16-51 / 1 , Prasant Nagar, Opp. Surycy of India, Uppal Road , Hyderabad- 39 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/309;

The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatie weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 60kg and minimum capacity of 250g. The verification scale interval (c) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping platc , sealing is also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practice

Further. in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of sane series with maximum capacity ranging between 50kg and 150kg. with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5.000 to 50,000 for 'e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' c' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design. accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (216)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 357 G1 /04-6 612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 333.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स काल-ऑन इंस्ट्रूमेंन्ट प्रा. लि., सं. 16-51/1 , प्रशान्त नगर, सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के सामने, उप्पल रोड़, हैदराबाद -39 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " सी एल- बी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कालऑन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/310 समनुदेशित किया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत मापी भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

है।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी कीजाती और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा और 500 कि.ग्राम. के बीच के रेंज में है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिसके सत्यापन अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 या अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (216 )/2002]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 613 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004

S.O. 333. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the self indicating , non- automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CL -B " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " CAL - ON " (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s Cal - On Instruments Pvt . Ltd, No. 16-51/ 1 , Prashant Nagar, Opp . Survey of India, Uppal Road , Hyderabad- 39 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2003/ 310;

The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 200kg. and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy andperformance of same series with maximum capacity ranging between 50kg . and 500kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k , being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (216 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 614

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 334.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स काल आन इन्सट्रूमेन्ट्स, नं . 16-51 , प्रशान्त नगर, सर्वे आफ इण्डिया के सामने , उप्पल रोड, हैदराबाद-39 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " काल आन- सीएस " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन स्केल ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " काल आन " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /267 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत मापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) अंकक सूचन सहित ( क्रेन स्केल) अस्वचलित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है । संत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 कि.ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड के प्रकार का है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द की जाती है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन, शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 1 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के "ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 10 टन की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 106)/ 2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 615

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004

S.O. 334. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of , non - automatic weighing instrument (Crane Scale) with digital indication ( herein referred to as the Model ) beloning to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class- III ) and " CAL- ON - CS " series with brand name " CAL -ON" , manufactured by M/ s Cal - On Instruments , No. 16-51 , Prashant Nagar, Opp . Survey of India, Uppal Road, Hyderabad - 39 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2003/267;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane Scale ) with digital indication of maximum capacity 5000 kg , minimum capacity 20kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III ) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 1kg . The display unit is of light emitting diode type . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hertz alternate current power supply.

practices. In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the power conferredby Sub-section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 5 tonne to 10 tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 1kg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 106)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/ MAGHA 25 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

का० आ ० 335.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डायमण्ड स्केल के. , शिवाजी नगर, सावरकुण्डला, गुजरात-364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित काउन्टर मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डायमण्ड स्केल कं. " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/03/392 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) 5 कि.ग्रा. के अधिकतम क्षमता सहित एक काउन्टर मशीन ( यांत्रिक ) है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, शुद्धता, डिजाइन के अनुसार, और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि.ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 168 ) /2001 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 617 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th January , 2004

S.O. 335. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of counter machine with brand name "Diamond Scale Co. " ( herein referred to as the Model ) manufactured by M/ s . Diamond Scale Co. , Shivaji Nagar , Savarkundla, Gujarat - 364515 , and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /03 /392 ;

of5 kg . The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a Counter Machine (Mechanical ) with a maximum capacity Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g to 50kg manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle, design, accuracy and with the same materials with which the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 168)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 फरवरी , 2004

का ०आ० 336.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाटं तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अर्जन वलजी एंड सन्स, पोस्ट बाक्स नं . 6 , सावर कुंडला-364515 ( गुजरात ) द्वारा विनिर्मित " काउन्टर मशीन " के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अर्जन वलजी एंड सन्स " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 03 /64 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

यह मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक काउंटर मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है ।

Hell link inter

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की रेंज की क्षमता सहित उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 272 )/2002 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 619 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 3rd February , 2004

S.O. 336. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of counter machine with brand name " Arjanvalji & Sons " ( herein referred to as the Model ) Manufactured by M/ s . Arjanvalji & Sons , Post Box No. 6. Savarkundla - 364515 ( Gujarat ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 03/64;

The said Model (see the figure given below ) is a Counter Machine . The maximum capacity is 10 kg .

अरजन पालजीवालजी

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with capacity ranging from 500g to 50kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved inodel have been manufactured.

JF. No. WM - 21 ( 272 )/2002 ) ,

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director, Legal Metrology 357 G1/04-7 620

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004 /MAGHA 25 , 1925

PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) |

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

का०आ ० 337.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

सं. की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि 1. आईएस 302-2-3 ( 1999 )

23-12-2003

संशोधन सं. 10 , जुलाई 2003

2. आईएस 371:1999

06-10-2003

संशोधन सं. 3, जून 2002

3. आईएस 1703: 2000

19-12-2003

संशोधन सं. 1 , अगस्त 2003

4. आईएस 2112:2003

31-12-2003

संशोधन सं. 1 , दिसम्बर 2003

5. आईएस 2692: 1989

19-12-2003

संशोधन सं . 2 , अगस्त 2003

6 . आइएस 3177: 1999

31-07-2003

संशोधन सं . 2 , जुलाई 2003

7. आईएस 3832: 1986

17-12-2003

संशोधन सं. 2, जुलाई 2003

8. आइएस 6304: 1992

31-08-2003

संशोधन सं. 1 , अगस्त 2003

6 आईएस 7150: 1974

31-07-2003

संशोधन सं. 1 , जुलाई 2003

10 आइएम 10131 : 1992

31-07-2003

संशोधन सं . 1 , जुलाई 2003

'1. आइएम 12661 ( भाग 1 ) : 1988

31-07-2003

संशोधन सं . 1 , जुलाई 2003

12. आईएस 12818 : 1992

09-01-2004

संशोधन सं. 4 , जुलाई 2003

आईएस 13386: 1992

19-12-2003

संशोधन सं . 4 , अगस्त 2003

नाईएम 13592: 1992

09-01-2004

संशोधन सं. 3 , जुलाई 2003

15 आईएस 14399 ( भाग 1 ): 1996

07-01-2004

संशोधन सं. 1 , जून 2003

16 आईएस 14543: 1998

04-12-2003

संशोधन सं. 7 , नवम्बर 2003

17. आइएम 15111 ( भाग 2 ) : 2002

31-8-2003

संशोधन सं . 2 अगस्त, 2003

18 आईएस 15245: 2003

31-07-2003

संशोधन सं . 1 , जुलाई 2003

19. आईएस 15297: 2003/

30-09-2003

संशोधन सं. 1 , सितम्बर 2003

आईएसओ 6103: 1999

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन १ , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों , नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों , अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: सीएमडी-1 /13: 5|

एस० के ० चौधरी, उप महानिदेशक ( मुंहर ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

621 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 30th January, 2004

S.O. 337. In pursuance of clause (b) of Sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules 1987 . the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notified that amendmentsto the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued .

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

No. & year of the Indian Standards

No. & Year of the

amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

1 . IS 302-2-3 : ( 1999 )

23-12-2003

Amendment No. 10

July 2003

2. IS 371 : 1999

06-10-2003

Amendment No. 3

June 2002

3. IS 1703 : 2000

19-12-2003

Amendment No. 1

August 2003

4. IS 2112 : 2003

31-12-2003

Amendment No. 1

December 2003

5. IS 2692 : 1989

19-12-2003

Amendment No. 2

August 2003

6. IS 3177 : 1999

31-07-2003

Amendment No. 2

July 2003

7. IS 3832 : 1986

17-12-2003

Amendment No. 2

July2003

8. IS 6304.1992

31-08-2003

Amendment No. 1

August 2003

9. IS 7150 : 1974

31-07-2003

Amendment No. 1

July2003

10. IS 10131 : 1992

31-07-2003

Amendment No. 1

July 2003

31-07-2003

11. IS 12661 (Pt 1 ) : 1988

Amendment No. 1

July 2003

12. IS 12818 : 1992

09-01-2004

Amendment No. 4

July 2003

13. IS 13386 : 1992

19-12-2003

Amendment No. 4

August 2003

09-01-2004

14. IS 13592: 1992

Amendment No. 3

July 2003

07-01-2004 15. IS 14399 (Pt 1 ): 1996

Amendment No. 1

June 2003

04-12-2003

16. IS 14543 : 1998

Amendment No. 7

November 2003

31-08-2003

17. IS 15111 (Pt 2) : 2002

Amendment No. 2

August 2003

18. IS 15245 : 2003

31-07-2003

Amendment No. 1

July 2003

30-09-2003

Amendment No. 1

19. IS 15297 : 2003/ ISO 6103 : 1999

September 2003

Copy of these amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Calcutta, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur . Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref.: CMD - 1 / 13: 51

S. K. CHAUDHURY, Dy. Director General ( Marks ) [PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

का० आ० 338.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

भामा

अनु. वर्ष

भारतीय मानक का

भाग लाइसेंसधारी का

लाइसेंस

क्रम

स्वीकृत करने

संख्या

शीर्षक

नाम व पता

की तिथि वर्ष/माह

सं. संख्या

01417

2003-02-19

1 . 6376580

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स एम.वी.एस. ज्वेलर्स , डी. नं . 9-1-257, सुरज टॉवर्स, सीबीएम कम्पाउंड, विशाखापटनम 530 016

04250

2003-02-15

2. 6376681

बिजली के घरेलू खाद्य द्रवीयरक और मिक्चर ग्राइंडर की विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण )

मैसर्स आकाश इंटरप्राइसेज, 62/2कावरई स्ट्रीट, मम्बक्कम , चेन्नई -600 048

14543

2003-03-01

3. 6376782

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर, (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स काव्य फूड्स एण्ड बेवरेजिज, 1/3 मेन रोड, कोडवासल, तिरूवरूर -612 610

12786

2003-02-24

4. 6376883

सिंचाई उपस्कर- सिंचाई लैटरल्स पोलिईथाइलीन पाइप विशिष्टि

मैसर्स नन्दी प्लास्टिक्स एण्ड पाइप्स इंडिया, 148 एंड 152 आईआईडीसी उडुमलपुरम ( जीपी) नन्दयाल मंडल, कुरनूल जिला

14543

2003-03-04

5. 6376984

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स जेवीआर पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वॉटर, सोगेण्डी एंड मोलासर गाँव, सनकुवर चथीराम पोस्ट, काँचीपुरम जिला-602 106

14543

2003-03-04

6. 6377077

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स ईगल एक्वा मिनरल वॉटर , 173 , सुन्दरम पिल्लई नगर, टोंडियारपेट, चेन्नई -600 081

02494

2003-03-01

7. 377178

V- पट्टे औद्योगिक प्रयोजन के लिए निरन्ज V-पट्टे भाग 1 सामान्य प्रयोजन (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स भारत रबड़ फैक्टरी , थिरूवलवयानल्लूर थानिचियम पोस्ट, वडिपत्ती तालुक, मदुरई

08112

2003-03-01

S. 6377279

43 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट ( चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स शिव साई इंडस्ट्रीज, नल्लबन्दागुडम गाँव, कोडाड मंडल, नलगौंडा जिला (आंध्र प्रदेश) 623

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

14543

2003-03-03

9. 6377380

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स आई सी फ्रेश वाटर लक्ष्मी वेंकटेश्वर कम्पाउंड, देवनहल्ली रोड, समीप " डी" क्रॉस डोड्डाबल्लापुर-561 203

14543

10. 6377481 2003-03-04

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स श्री गोकुल एक्वा प्रॉडक्ट्स, चित्तूर गाँव सनकुवर चथिराम काँचीपुरी जिला-602 108

01417

2003-02-28

11. 6277582

मैसर्स फेशन जवेलर्स , मेन रोड, कोल्लम -691 001

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन - विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

00455

2003-02-26

12. 6377683

पोर्टलैंड धातुमल सीमेंट ( चौथा पुनरीक्षण )

मैसर्स महालक्ष्मी इंडस्ट्रीज रेडलाकुंता गाँव , कोडाड मंडल, नलगौंडा जिला ( आ.प्र. )

01008

2003-03-03

13. 6377784

तेज उबाल निर्मित चीनी मिष्ठान्न (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स टारगेट फूड प्रॉडक्ट्स, प्लॉट न. 52 , बंदलागुड़ा इंड० एरिया, मैलारदेवपल्ली, राजेन्द्र नगर मंडल, आर . आर . जिला-500 063

14543

2003-03-08

14. 6377885

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स प्राइमस इंटरनेशनल, १ , रूबी पार्क मुत्तुकडु गाँव कोवलम, पोस्ट काँचीपुरम

00374

2003-03-01

15. 6377986

बिजली के छत के पंखे और रेग्यूलेटर (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स खैतान इलैक्ट्रिकल्स लि. , 129 , एसबीसीआई एस्टेट बोलाराम, मेडक जिला

01417

2003-02-28

16. 6378079

मैसर्स अभिलाष ज्वेलरी , बिशाप जेरोम नगर, कोल्लम-691 001

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

01417

2003-02-26

17. 6378180

मैसर्स इडिमन्नीकल फेशन ज्वेलरी के.पी.वी. /859 कन्जीरापल्ली कोट्टयम-686 507

00455

2003-03-01

18. 6378281

पोर्टलैंड धातुमल सीमेंट (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स मालाबार सीमेंट्स लि. , वलायर वलाया, पी.ओ. पलक्कड, स्लेग जिला-678 624 624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

19. 637838: 2 2003-02-19

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स गुड हैल्थ इंडस्ट्रीज एस. नं. 307/1 बालारामपुरम स्ट्रीट अलीपुरम (गाँव) नेल्लोर रूरल ( मंडल ) नेल्लोर जिला-524 314

2003-03-01

20. 6378584

13334

मलाई युक्त दूध पाउडर

भाग 1 मानक ग्रेड

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स मदर डेरी यूनिट आफ केएमएफ येलाहंका जी.के.वी.के. पोस्ट बंगलौर-560 065

21. 6378685 2003-03-12

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स मेगा मिस्ट इंटर- प्राइसेज 289/1 , गार्डन रोड, अलामति चेन्नई -600 052

98 22. 6378786 2003-03-08

14543

मैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द्र प्राकृतिक मिनरल 'जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स समुद्रा इंजीनियरिंग एसोसिऐट्स 73 , पुडुवालसु लक्कापुरम इरोड़-638 002

23. 6378887

99 2003-03-11

01417

मैसर्स पवित्रज्वेलरी XI/ 888 मेन रोड, पट्- यानूर कन्नूर जिला-670 307

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं,

आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि

(तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

24. 6378988 2003-03-12

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स मदर वाटर प्रॉडक्टस आरएस नं . 179/3 , पोंडी-डिन्डीवनम रोड, तिरूचित्रम्बलम गाँव, औरूविल्ले, वनूर ( टी के ) , विल्लुपुरम जिला-605 101

2003-03-12

25. 6378988

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स हाइजीन फूड प्रॉडक्टस, चिन्नाकोलवरी , काझपेरूम्बक्कम पोस्ट वनूर तालुक विल्लूपुरम जिला

26. 6379081 2003-03-12

04467

घेरामल- विशिष्टि (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स ऑस्बार्न एसेन्शियल ऑयल्स 50 और 51 सिडको इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, विचूर, चेन्नई 600 103

27. 6379182 2003-03-12

04985

2000 मैसर्स किरण पाइप्स नं . 92 अन्ना. नगर, पेट्टई, तिरूनेलवेली-627010

पेय जल आपूर्ति हेतु गैर- प्लास्टिकृत पीवीसी पाइप- विशिष्टि( तीसरा पुनरीक्षण) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

625

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

28. 6379283 2003-02-15

12269

53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

मैसर्स तंडूर सीमेंट्स ( प्रा. ) लि. सर्वे नं. 112/ए उदमेश्वरम गांव कोडंगल मंडल , मेहबूब नगर जिला आंध्र प्रदेश -509 338

29. 6379384 2003-03-01

00418

78 मैसर्स केपीएस इंटरप्राइसेज 6/14 ए वलियापरम्बा, पोस्ट पुलज्कल मालापुरम-673 637

टंगस्टन तंतु के सामान्य सेवा बिजली के लैम्प (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

30. 6379485 2003-03-01

08112

89 मैसर्स लक्ष्मी श्रीनिवास इंडस्ट्रीज डोंडापडू गाँव, मेल्लाचरूवू मंडल नलगोंडा जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

43ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

31. 6379586 2003-02-19

00261

कॉपर सल्फेट ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

मैसर्स मगसमेटल्स प्रा . लि. , लॉगोजीगुडेम गाँव , चौद्रुपल मंडल नलगौंडा जिला

2003-03-25

14151

99 32. 6379687

सिंचाई तंत्र के छिड़काव गुग्मक के लिए पॉलीइथा- इलीन के पाइप

मैसर्स कुशाल पॉलिमर्स प्रा. लि. , शेड नं० 18 फेस 2 , आईडीए, चेरलापल्ली, आर आर जिला-500 051

14543

33. 6379788 2003-03-18

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स अनु इंटरप्राइसेज केएचआर गार्डन पुडुचेरी गाँव, सोमंगलम श्रीपेरूम्बुदूर तालुक, कांचीपुरम जिला-602109

94 2003-03-18

34. 6379889

05346

मैसर्स एम एम ट्रेडर्स 10 ए/ 3 कल कुथिरई ठाका स्ट्रीट, तिरूवन्नामलाई 606 601

संश्लिष्ट खाद्य रंग- निमित्तियाँ और मिश्रण (दूसरा पुनरीषण)

14543

98 35. 6379990 2003-03-19 मैसर्स एक्वा टेक वाटर सिस्टम्स 14- ए भारती स्ट्रीट, के के नगर, मदुरई-625 020

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

14543

98 2003-03-18

36. 6380066

मैसर्स श्री विजयलक्ष्मी फूड प्रॉडक्ट्स 27 - ए/1 पिल्लईयर कोइल स्ट्रीट, नवलपुर, रानीपेट-632 402

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

14543

98 37. 6380167 2003-03-19

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल. जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स श्री बालाजी एक्वा प्रॉडक्ट्स एस. न. 88/3 तिरूपंथियूर रोड सौगंदी गांव , श्रीपेरूम्बुदूर ब्लॉक एण्ड तालुक, काँचीपुरम जिला -602 106

14543

98 2003-03-25

38. 6380268

मैसर्स लखम फूडम एण्ड बेवरेजिज शेड नं. 5 बी आईडीए, फेस 4, चेर्लापल्ली, हैदराबाद -500 051

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि 626

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

99 39. 6380369 2003-03-11 मैसर्स चाँदना ब्रॉदर्स ज्वेलर्स , काकीनाडा डी.न. 13-1-45 मेन रोड, काकीनाडा-533001

आभूषण/शिल्पकारी स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, 01417 शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन- विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

99 2003-03-11

40. 6380470

मैसर्स चाँदना ब्रॉदर्स शॉपिंग माल सम्मुख जज कोर्ट डी.न. 29-2-24 विशाखापटनम -20

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, 01417 आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन- विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुंनरीक्षण)

99 2003-03-11

41. 6380571

मैसर्स चाँदना ब्रॉदर्स ज्वेलर्स , 5-4-790 एबीआईडीएस नामपल्ली स्टेशन रोड, हैदराबाद-500001

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, 01417 आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन- विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

88 2003-03-25

42. 6380672

मैसर्स जयश्री केबल्स एण्ड कंडक्टर्स (प्रा. ) लि. , गगोनूर पी. ओ. कुंजन्दीयूर मेत्तूर डेम -636404

पी वी सी रोधित ( भारी कार्य ) 01554 बिजली की केबल भाग 1 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोलटता के लिए (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

14543

98 2003-03-25

43. 6380773

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स रावानी फूड एण्ड बेवरेजिज (प्रा. ) लि. , सर्वे नं. 234 कन्निगईपेर गाँव समीप इंडियन बैंक उथूकूटई तालुक थिरूवल्लूर जिला

99 2003-03-18

44. 6380874

मैसर्स लिओटेक नं . 25, जे.सी. इंड. एस्टेट छठा मेन रोड, कनकपुरा रोड बंगलौर-560061

ए.सी. स्थैतिक वाट घंटामीटर 13779 वर्ग 1 और वर्ग 2- विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

92 2003-03-24

12933

45. 6380975

सौर सपाट पट्टिका संग्राहक की विशिष्टि भाग 1 अपेक्षाएं (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स सनड्राप सोलर सिस्टम्स, नं. 44/2 ए इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट कोडिजेहल्ली गेट बेल्लारी रोड, हेब्बल , बंगलौर -560 024

92 46. 6381068 2003-03-24

12933

मैसर्स वेल्नेट सिस्टम्स नं . 1 , कोडिजेहल्ली गाँव बंगलौर-560 024

सौर सपाट पट्टिका संग्राहक की विशिष्टि भाग 1 अपेक्षाएं (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

14543

98 2003-03-12

47 6281169

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स मरूथम इंडस्ट्रीज, 2/445 सदायर कोइल रोड, थिरूबुवनम गाँव सलिमंगलम पी.ओ. थनजावुर 613504 627 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माष 25 , 1925

[ भाग 1]- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

14543

2003-03-25

48. 6381270

मैसर्स श्री बालाजी एसोसिएटस, 110, इरूमईवेत्ती पलायम शोलावरम पोस्टचैन्नई 600067

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

14151 01

2003-03-21

49. 6381371

सिंचाई तंत्र के छिड़काव यंत्र के लिए पॉलिइथाईलीन के पाइप

मैसर्स ऋषि पॉलिमर्स प्रा. लि. , . नं. 16/ए बेलागोला इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया के आर एस रोड, मैसूर 570016

01417

2003-02-28

50. 6381472

मैसर्स मेघराज एण्ड ब्रादर्स, शोरूम नं . 530 मेघ मार्केट एवेन्यूरोड़ बंगलौर 560002

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं , आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन- विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

01417

2003-03-11

51. 6381573

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन- विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स चांदना ब्रादर्स ज्वेलर्स प्रा.लि. , 27-1-5/5 राजागोपालाचारी स्ट्रीट लेनिन सेन्टर गवनॉरपेट विजयवाडा 520002

01417

2003-03-11

52. 6381674

मैसर्स गोल्ड पैलेस 13/34 माडापाला स्ट्रीट सम्मुख जैन मंदिर नेल्लोर 524001

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

01417

2003-03-11

53. 6381775

मैसर्स न्यूआन्ध्रा ज्वेलरी, 13/141 माडापाला स्ट्रीट नेल्लोर524001

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

01328

2003-03-08

54. 6381876

परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स रावेला डोर्स एण्ड डेकोर्स, ए-13, रोड नं. १ आईडीए नाचारम हैदराबाद 500076

00303

2003-03-08

55. 6381977

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड ( तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स रावेला डोर्स एण्ड डेकोर्स, ए-13 , रोड नं. १ आईडीए माचारम हैदरामाद 500076

14543

2003-03-26

56. 6382070

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स वसुधा इंडस्ट्रीज , 44/45, इचिक्कामलईपति थिरूमलई समुतिरम पंचायत त्रिचै-620021

14543

2003-03-26

57. 6382171

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स धारीवाल इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड, 44-124 मौला-अली समीप नचारम टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज हैदराबाद-500076

13095

2003-03-28

58. 6382272

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु बटरफलाई वाल्व

मैसर्स हवा वाल्व्य ( इंडिया) प्रा. लि. , सी-255, एम.टी. सागर इंड. एस्टेट गोकुल रोड, हुबली-580030

357 G/04-8 628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004 /MAGHA 25 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 1

59. 6382373 2003-03-26

14543

98 मैसर्स पवित्र एक्वॉ इंडस्ट्रीज, 10, मदुरई चेट्टी गली चौलई चैन्नई -600112

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

60. 6382474 2003-03-27

12933 01

सौर सपाट पट्टिका संग्राहक कीविशिष्टि भाग 1 अपेक्षाएँ (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स अदित्या सोलर सिस्टम्स, 4 और 5, 80 फीट रोड़, आरएम.वी. दूसरी स्टेज अश्वथनगर बंगलौर-560094

61. 6382575 2003-03-28

14543

98 मैसर्स शिब्रा मिनरल्स 7-8, " शिब्रा फर्म्स " नागसाम्द्रा पौंस्ट 'बंगलौर-560073

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

62. 6382676 2003-03-24

12269

53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

मैसर्स लानको इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , राचगुन्नेरी श्रीकाकीहस्ती मंडल, चितूर जिला आंध्र प्रदेश -517641

63. 6382777 2003-03-28

14543

98 मैसर्स यूनीक मिनरल वाटर यूनिट , के आर टी रोड कार स्ट्रीट तीर्थाहल्ली-577432 E

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक 'मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

64. 6382878 2003-03-28

14543

98 मैसर्स के के इंटरप्राइजिज नं. 37, कथ्रिगुप्पे पापैह गार्डन बनासनकरी तीसरी स्टेज बंगलौर+560085

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल मल के अलावा) विशिष्टि:

65. 6382979 2003-03-27

14543

98 मैसर्स वाटर टेक इंजीनियर्स, एच नं . 1-82-प्लॉट नं. 188/5 रामारम हसनधारथी वारांगल-506015

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्दःप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्टि

66. 6383072

2000 2003-03-24

04985

मैसर्स भारती एजेंसिस सर्वे नं. 21279 सुरमपल्ली गाँव गन्नाबरम मंडल। कृष्णाजिला-521212

पेय जल आपूर्ति के लिए गैर- प्लास्टिकृत पीवीसी पाइप (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण )

67. 6383173 2003-03-27

00455

89.

पोर्टलैंड धातुमल सीमेंट (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स श्री रामान्जनेया इंडस्ट्रीज, सर्वे नं. 46 रेडलाकुंता ( वी) कोडाड ( एम ) नलगौंडा जिला आ.प्र.

68. 6383274 2003-03-27

00455

पोर्टलैंड धातुमल सीमेंट ('चौथा' पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स श्री राज्यलक्ष्मी इंडस्ट्रीज, सर्वे नं. 46/1 रेडलाकुंता (वी) कोहाड (एम ) नालगौंडा जिला आ

69. 6383375

85 2003-03-27

गैसमेन, कलमेन औरसीवरों 05382 के लिएतराड की सीलिम रिंग ( पहला पुनरीक्षणा

मैसर्स महालक्ष्मी रंबड प्रॉडक्ट्स प्लॉट नं. ४ फेसन, आईडीए चेर्लापल्लीत हैदराबादम्ड ०००१

[संदर्भ: सीएमडी-तिरूवन्ना-1/13: 11 ]

एसः के, त्वौधरी, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर ) 629

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

[ भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th January , 2004

S.O. 338. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5) of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Name & Address of the Party

Licence No.

Sl . No.

Operative Date (Year/Month)

2003-02-19

6376580

01.

M/ s M.V.S. Jewel Park D. No. 9-1-257 Suraj Towers CBM Compound Visakhapatnam-530016 6376681 2003-02-15

02.

M/ s Akash Enterprises 62/2 Kavarai Street . Mambakkam Chennai -600048

03. 6376782 2003-03-01 M/ s Kavya Foods and Beverages 1/3 . Main Road Kodavasai, Thiruvarur - 612611 2003-02-24

6376883

(04.

M/ s Nandi Plasticisers & Pipes India 148 & 152 IIDC Uduinalpuram (GP) Nandyal Mandal Kurnool DT 2008-03-04

6376984

05.

M/ s JVR Packaged Drinking Water Sogandy & Molasar Village Sunkuvar Chathiram Post Kancheepuram PT-602 1106

06. 63774077 2003-03-04 M/ s Eagle Aqua Mineral Water 173 , Sundaram Pillai NagarTondiarpet Chonnai -6000 )8 I

2003-03-01

07. 6377178

M/s Bharat Rubber Factory Thiruvalvayanallur Thanichiyam Post Vadipatti Taluk Madurai .

2003-03-01

18. 6377279

M/ s Siva. Sai Industries nallabandagudam Village Kodad Mandal . Nalgonda District , Andhra Pradesh 2003-03-43

1096377380

M/ s I'C'Fresh Water Lakshmi Venkateshwara Compound Devarnahalli Road Near ' D ' Cross Doddaballapur - 561203

Part Sec .Year

IS No.

Title of the Standard

1)1417

Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts-Fineness andMarking - Specification (Third Rovision)

14250

Specification for Domestic Electric Food-Mixtures (Liquidized and Grinders ) (FirstRevision)

14543

Specification for Packaged Drinking water ( other than packaged Natural , Mineral Water)

12786

Irrigation Equipment- Polycthyclonc Pipos for Irrigation laterlas- Specification

14543

Specification for Packaged Drinking water ( other than Pakaged Natural Mineral Water)

145-43

Spedification for Packaged Drinking water (other than Packagod natural Mineral Water)

102494 11

V-Bolts Endless V- Belts for Industrial Purposes - Part 1 : General Purposes- Specification (Second Revision )

08112

Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement. (First Revision)

14543

98 Specification for packaged Drinking water (Other than packaged Natural Mineral water) 650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

10. 6377481 2003-03-04 M/ s Sree Gokul Aqua Products Chittoor Village Sunkuvar Chathiram Kancheepuram DT. -602108

11. 6377582 2003-02-28 M/ s Fashion Jewellers MainRoad Kollam -691001 12. 6377683 2003-02-26 M/ s Mahalakshmi Industries Redlakunta Village Kodad Mandal Nalgonda District -A.P.

13. 6377784 2003-03-03 M/ s Taarget Food Products Plot No. 52, Bandlaguda, Indl. Are Mallardevpally Rajendranagar Mandal , R.R. District-500063

14. 6377885 2003-03-08 M/ s Primus International 9, Ruby park Muttukadu Village Kovalam Post Kancheepuram 15. 6377986 2003-03-01 M/ s Khaitan Electricals Ltd. 129, SVCI Estate Bollaram Medak District-

16. 6378079 2003-02-28 M/ s Abhilash Jewellery, Bishop Jerome Nagar Kollam-691001

17. 6378180 2003-02-26 M/ s Edimannickal Fashion Jewellery K.P.V/859 Kanjirapally Kottayam -686507

18. 6378281 2003-03-01 M/ s Malabar Cements Ltd. Walayar Walaya P.O. Palakkad SLAG District-678 624 19. 6378382 2003-02-19 M/ s Good Health Industries S.No. 307/1 Balaramapuram Street Allipuram (Village) Nellore Rural (Mandal ) Nellore DT. - 524314 20. 6378584 2003-03-01 M/ s Mother Dairy Unit of KMF Yelahanka G.K.V.K. PostBangalore-560065 2003-03-12

21. 6378685

M/ s Megaa Mist Enterprises 289/1 Garden Road Alamathi Chennai -600052

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] 5

14543

98 Specification for packaged drinking water (Other than packagedNatural Mineral water)

01417

99 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artificats- Fineness and marking- Specification (Third Revision)

00455

Specification for Portland SLAG Cement ( Fourth Revision)

01008

79 Specification for Hard Bolled Sugar Confectionery (Second Revision)

14543

Specification for packaged drinking water (Other than packaged Natural Mineral Water)

00374

Electric Celling Type Fans & Regulators (Third Revision )

01417

Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts -Fineness and marking -Specification (Third Revision)

01417

99 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts-Fineness and marking -Specification (Third Revision)

00455

Specification for Portland Cement (Fourth Revision)

14543

Specification for Packaged drinking water (other than packaged Natural Mineral Water)

13334 01

Skimmed Milk Powder Specification -Part 1 : Standard Grade (FirstRevision)

14543

Specification for Packaged drinking water ( other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

631

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14 , 2004/माघ 25, 1925

4 1 2

22. 6378786 2003-03-08 M/ s Samudharaah Engineering Associates 73 , Puduvalasu Lakkapuram Erode-638002 23. 6378887 2003-03-11 M/ s Pavithra Jewellery XI/888 , Main Road Payyanur Kannur Dist. -670307 24. 6378988 2003-03-12 M/ s Mother water products RS . No. 179/3 Pondy-Dindivanam RoadTiruchitrambalam Village Aurovillc, Vanur (TK) Villupuram District-605101 25. 6378988 2003-03-12 M/ s Hygiene Food Products Chinnakoluvari Kazhupcrumbakkam Post Vanur TalukVillupuram District- 26. 6379081 2003-03-12 M/s Osborine Essential Oils 50&51 , Sidco Industrial Estate Vichoor Chennai -600 103 27 6379182 2003-03-12 M/ s Kiran Pipes No. 92 Anna Nagar Pettai Tirunelveli -627 010 28. 6379283 2003-02-15 M/ s Tandur Cements (P) Ltd. Survey No. 112/A Udmeshwaram Village Kodangal Mandal Mahaboob Nagar District Andhra Pradesh -509 338 29. 6379384 2003-03-01 M/ s Kaypees Enterprises 6/14 A Valliyaparamba Post PulikkalMalappuram -673 637 30. 6379485 2003-03-01 M/ s Lakshmi Srinivasa Industrics Dondapadu Village mellachruvu Mandal Nalgonda District Andhra Pradesh-- 31. 6379586 2003-03-19 M/s Magus Metals Pvt . Ltd. Longojigudem Village Chouttupal Mandal Nalgonda District-

32. 6379687 2003-03-25 M/ s Kushal Polymers Pvt . Ltd. Shed No. 18 Phase II , IDA Cheralpally R.R. District-500 051 33. 6379788 2003-03-18 M/ s Anu Enterprises KhrGardens Puducheri Village Somangalam Sriperumbudur Taluk Kancheepuram District-602 109

14543

98 Specification for Packaged drinking water ( other than packaged Natural, Mineral Water)

01417

99 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts -Fineness and marking -Specification (Third Revision)

14543

Specification for packaged Drinking water (Other than packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14543

98 Specification for Packaged drinking water (other than packaged Natural Mineral Water)

04467

96 Caramel-Specification (Second Revision)

04985

Unplasticized PVC Pipes for Potable Water Supplies- Specification (Third Revision)

12269

87 Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement

00418

78 Tungsten Filament General Service Lamps (ThirdRevision)

08112

89 Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement (FirstRevision)

00261

CopperSulphate (Second Revision)

14151 02

Irrigation Equipment Sprinkler Pipes-Specification- Part 2 : Quick Coupled Polyethyelene Pipes

14543

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) [PART II--SEC. 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

632

05346

2003-03-18

314 6379889

M/ s MM Traders 10 A/3 Kalkuthiri Thakka Street Thiruvannamalai- 606601

Synthetic Food Colour- Preparations and Mixtures- Specification (Second Revisions )

14543

35. 6379990 2003-03-19 M/ s Aqua Tech Water Systems 14 -A Bharathi Street K. K. Nagar Madurai -625 020

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water ( Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14543

36. 6380066 2003-03-18 M/ s Sri Vijayalakshmi Food Products 27 - A/ 1 Pillaiyar Koil Street Navalpur Ranipet -632 402

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14543

37 6380167 2003-03-19

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water ( Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

M/ s Sree Balaji Aquaa Products S. No. 88/3 Thirupanthiyur Road Sogandi Village Sriperumbudur Block & Taluk Kancheepuram DT-602 106

14543

2003-02-25

38. 6380268

M/ s Lakham Foods & Beverages Shed No. 5B IDA, Phase IV Cherlapally Hyderabad-500 051

Specificatión for Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

01417

2003-03-11

Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts-Fineness andMarking-Specification (Third Revision)

M/ s Chandana Brothers Jewellers, Kakinada D. No. 13-1-45 Main Road Kakinada -533 001

01417

2003-03-11

6330470

40.

M/ s Chandana Bros Shopping Mall Opp. Judge Court D. No. 29-2-24 Visakhapatnam-20

Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts-Fineness and marking specification (Third Revision )

01417

2003-03-11

41. 6380571

and Marking - Specification Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts-Fineness (Third Revision )

Jewellers M/ s Chandana Brothers 5-4-790 Abids Nampally Station RoadHyderabad- 500 001

01554 01 2003-03-25

6380672

42.

M/ s Jayashree Cables & Condusctors (P ) Ltd Gonur P. O. Kunjandiyur Mettur Dam -636 404

PVC Insulated (Heavy Duty) Electric Cables: Part1 : for working Voltage , upto and including 1100V (Third Revision)

14543

2003-03-25

43. 63.80773

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (Other than) Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

Pvt. Ltd. M/ s Rawani Food & Beverages Survey No. 234 Kannigajpair Village Near Indian Bank Uthukoottai Taluk Thiruvallur District---

13779

2003-03-18

44. 6380874

ac Static Watthour Meters , Class 1 and 2- Specification

M/ s Leotech No. 25 , J. C. Indl . Estate 6th Main Road Kanakapura Road Bangalore-560 061

12933 01 45. 6380075 2003-03-24

(FirstRevision) Solar Flat Plate Collector- Specification Part1 : Requirements (First Revision)

M/s Sundrop Solar Systems No. 44/2A Industrial Estate Kodigehalli Gate Bellary Road, Hebbal Bangalore- 560 024 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

46. 6381068 2003-03-24 M/ s Velnet Systems No. 1 Kodigehalli Village Bangalore -560 024 47. 6381169 2003-03-12 M/s Marutham.Industries 2/445 Sadayar Koil Road Thirubuvanam Village Saljamangalam P. O. Thanjavur -613 504 48. 6381270 2003-03-25 M/s Sri Balaji Associates 110, Erumaivetti Palayam Sholavaram Post Chennai -600 067

49. 6381371 2003-03-21 M/s Rishi Polymers Pvt. Ltd No. 16/A, Belagola Industrial Arca KRS Road Mysore- 570 016 .

50. 6381472 2003-02-28 M/ s Menghraj & Bros Show Room No. 530 Megh Market Avene Road Bangalore -560 002 51. 6381573 2003-03-11 M/ s Chandana Brothers Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. 27-1-5/ 5 Rajagopalachari Street Lenin Centre Governorpet Vijayawada- 520 002

52. 6381674 2003-03-11 M/ s Gold Palace 13/34, Madaoala Street Opp . Jain Temple Nellore- 524 001 53. 6381775 2003-03-11 M/ s Newandhra Jewellery 13/141 Mandapala Street Nellore- 524 001

2003-03-08

6381876

M/ s Raavela Doors & Decors A- 13 , Road No. 9 IDA Nacharam Hyderabad-500 076 2003-03-08

55. 6381977

M/ s Raavela Doors and Decors A- 13 , Road No. 9 IDA Nacharm Hyderabad- 500076 2003-03-26

56. 6382070

M/ s Vasutha Industries 44/45 , Ichikkamalaipatti Thirumalai Samuthiram Panchyat Trichy-620021

2003-03-26

57. 6382171

Hyderabad-500076 M/ s Dhariwal Industries Limited 44-124, Moula- Ali Near Nacharam Telephone Exchange

633 5

12933 01

92 Solar Flat Plate Collector- Specification Part 1: Requirements (FirstRevision)

14543

98 Specification for Packaged Drinking Water ( Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14543

98 Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14151 01

99 Irrigation Equipment---- SprinklersPipes- Specification- Part1: Polythylene Pipes

01417

99 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts-Fineness and Marking-Specification (Third Revision)

1417

99 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery /Artifacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification (Third Revision)

01417

99 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts-Fineness andMarking- Specification (Third Revision)

01417

Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery /Artifacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification (Third Revision)

01328

Veneered Decorative Plywood-Specification (Third Revision)

00303

89 Specification for Plywood for General Purposes (Third Revision )

14543

Packaged Natural Mineral Water) Specification for Packaged Drinking water (other than

14543

Specification for Packaged Drinking water ( other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water ) [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

634

13095

2003-03-28

6382272

58.

Butterfly Valves for General , Purposes

M/ s Hawa valves ( India) P. Ltd. C-255 , M.T. Sagar Indl . Estate, Gokul Road Hubli - 580030

14543

2003-03-26

6382373

59.

M/ s Pavithra Aqua Industries 10, Madurai Chetty Street Choolai Chennai -600112

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

12933 01 2003-03-27

60 6382474

Solar Flat Plate Collector- Specification Part 1 : Require- ments (First Revision )

M/ s Aditya Solar Systems 4& 5 , 80 Ft . Road R.M.V. 2nd . Stage Aswathnagar, Bangalore- 560094

14543

2003-03-28

61 6382575

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural , Mineral Water)

M/s Shibra Minerals 7-8, " Shibra Farms " Nagasamdra Post Bangalore- 560073

12269

20003-03-24

62. 6382676

Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement

M/ s Lanco Industries Ltd. Rachagunneri Srikakahasti Mandal Chitoor District Andhra Pradesh- 517641

14543

2003-03-28

6382777

63.

M/ s Unique Mineral Water Unit KRT Road Car Street Thirthahalli - 577432

Specification for Plywood Drinking water (other than Package Natural Mineral Water)

14543

64. 6382878 2003-03-28

Specification for Plywood Drinking water (other than Package Natural Mineral Water)

M/ s K. K. Enterprises No. 37 Kathriguppe Papaiah Garden Banasankari III Stage Bangalore - 560085

14543

2003-03-27

6382979

65.

Specification for Packaged Drinking water (other than Package Natural Mineral Water)

M/s Water Tech . Engineers H. No. 1-82 Plot No. 188/5 Ramaram Hasanparthy Warangal-506015

04985

2003-403-24

6383072

Unplasticized PVC Pipes for Potable Water Supplics- Specification (Third Revision )

M/ s Bharathi Agencies Survey No. 217/1 , Surampally Village Gannavaram Mandal Krishna District -521212

00455

2003-03-27

67. 6383173

Specification for Portland Slag Cement (Fourth Revision)

M/s Sri Ramanjancya Industries Survey No. 46 Redlakunta (V) Kodad (M) Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh

00455

68 6383274 20003-03-27

Specification for Portland Slag Cement (Fourth Revision)

M/ s Sri Rajayalakshmi Industries Survey No. 46/1 , Redlakunta (V) Kodad (M) Nalgonda District Andhra Pradesh

05382

2003-403-27

69 6333375

M/s Mahalakshmi Rubber Products Plot No. 58 Phase I , IDA Cheralpally, Hyderabad-500051

Specification for Rubber Sealing Rings for Gas Mains , Water Mainsand Sewers (FirstRevision )

[Ref: CMD - 1/ 13 : 11 ]

S.K. CHAUDHURY, Dy. Director General (Marks) 635 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

जल संसाधन मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2003

3. इण्डिया एनपीआईएम के नियमों एवं विनियमों के नियम 9.3 के अनुसार सोसायटी का प्रशासन एवं परिसंपत्तियां तुरंत भारत सरकार की ओर से आयुक्त ( पीपी ) , जल संसाधन मंत्रालय द्वारा अधिकार में ले ली जाएंगी जो वित्तीय संस्थाओं, जहां पर सोसायटी के लेखे संचालित. किए जा रहे हैं, सहित सभी संबंधित को उपरोक्त के बारे में यथोचित रूप से सूचित करेगा ।

4. इण्डिया एनपीआईएम के पदेन अध्यक्ष जांच अधिकारी की रिपोर्ट की एक अधिप्रमाणित प्रति सहित सोसायटी के रजिस्ट्रार को भारत सरकार के निर्णयों से यथोचित रूप से अवगत करायेगा । का. आ. 339. जबकि भारतीय सहभागिता सिंचाई प्रबंधन संबंधी नेटवर्क ( जिसे इसके पश्चात इण्डिया एनपीआईएम कहा जाएगा ) , सोसायटीज रजिस्ट्रेशन अधिनियम , 1860 के अंतर्गत दिल्ली में पंजीयत एक संस्था, के संगम ज्ञापन तथा नियमों और विनियमों के नियम 9.1 के अनुसार भारत सरकार के पास समय - समय पर ऐसे निर्देश जारी करने की शक्ति है जिन्हें यह संगम ज्ञापन तथा नियमों और विनियमों में निर्धारित उद्देश्यों को प्राप्त करने अथवा जारी रखने के प्रयोजन के वास्ते इण्डिया एनपीआईएम के लिए आवश्यक समझे ।

5. इण्डिया एनपीआईएम के पदेन अध्यक्ष यदि आवश्यक हुआ तो सोसायटीज के रजिस्ट्रार के परामर्श से इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से छः महीने की अवधि के भीतर इण्डिया एनपीआईएम के संगम ज्ञापन और नियमों एवं विनियमों के प्रावधानों के अनुसार इण्डिया एनपीआईएम की शासी निकाय का कड़ाई से चुनाव करायेगा । और जबकि भारत सरकार ने इण्डिया एनपीआईएम के सदस्यों से विभिन्न अभ्यावेदन प्राप्त किए हैं जिनमें अन्य बातों के साथ-साथ इण्डिया एनपीआईएम की कार्यशैली में खराब कार्यपद्धति, खराब प्रशासन और वित्तीय अनियमितताओं पर प्रकाश डाला गया है ।

6. आयुक्त ( पीपी ) जल संसाधन मंत्रालय को सोसायटी के नये पदेन अध्यक्ष होने के नाते जांच अधिकारी की सिफारिशों, जिन्हें भारत सरकार द्वारा स्वीकार कर ली गई हैं, पर यथोचित कार्रवाई करनी चाहिए ।

[सं. 10/6/2000- क.क्षे.वि. ] और जबकि भारत सरकार को संस्था के नियमों और उपनियमों के नियम 9.2 के तहत इण्डिया एनपीआईएम की कार्य पद्धति और प्रगति की समीक्षा अथवा निरीक्षण करने तथा संबंधित मामलों में जांच करने और भारत सरकार द्वारा चाहे गए ढंग से इसकी रिपोर्ट देने के लिए एक या एक से अधिक व्यक्तियों को नियुक्त करने की शक्ति प्राप्त है ।

डी. सी. सामंत, अपर सचिव

MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2003 और जबकि उपरोक्त नियम 9.2 के अनुसार भारत सरकार ने अधिसूचना संख्या 10/9/2003- सतकर्ता, दिनांक 13-5-2003 द्वारा श्री निरंजन पंत, संयुक्त सचिव और वित्तीय सलाहाकार, जल संसाधन मंत्रालय को इण्डिया एनपीआईएम के मामलों की जांच करने और अपनी रिपोर्ट सचिव, जल संसाधन मंत्रालय को प्रस्तुत करने के लिए जांच अधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

और जबकि उपरोक्त जांच अधिकारी ने 30-7-2003 को अपनी रिपोर्ट भारत सरकार को प्रस्तुत कर दी है और उक्त जांच रिपोर्ट पर सरकार द्वारा विचार किया गया है तथा इस रिपोर्ट में दी गई सभी सिफारिशों कोस्वीकार करने का निर्णय किया गया है ।

S.O. 339. Whereas in terms of Rule 9.1 of the Memorandum of Association and Rules and Regulations on IndianNetwork on Participatory Irrigation Management (hereinafter India NPIM) , a society registered in Delhi under the Societies Registration Act , 1860 , the Government of India possesses the power to issue such directives as it may consider necessary from time to time to India NPIM for the pupose of carrying out or continuing the objects set out in the Memorandum of Association and Rules and Regulations:-

And whereas the Government of India received various representations from the Members of India NPIM interalia highlighting malfunctioning , mal -administration and financial improprieties in the working of India NPIM;

अतः अब , जांच अधिकारी के निष्कर्षों और सिफारिशों पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और सभी संबंधित तथ्यों और स्थितियों को समग्र रूप से ध्यान में रखते हुए, भारत सरकार, जन हित में निम्नानुसार निर्देश देती है :

AND WHEREAS the Government of India is empowered under Rule 9.2 of the Rules and Regulations of the Society to appoint one or more person to review or inspect the working and progress of India NPIM and hold enquiries into the affairs thereof and to report thereon in such manner as the Government of India may decide;

1. इण्डिया एनपीआईएम कि नियमों और विनियमों के नियम 10.5 के अनुसार इण्डिया एनपीआईएम की दूसरे शासी निकाय का कार्यकाल 17-01-2002 को सामप्त हो गया । अतः 17-1-2002 के पश्चात् से इण्डिया एनपीआईएम की दूसरे शासी निकाय के कार्यों को अवैध घोषित किया जाता है । इस अवैध निकाय द्वारा अपने मूल कार्यकाल के बाद लिए गये सभी निर्णयों को रद्द घोषित किया जाता है ।

And whereas in terms of aforesaid Rule 9.2 , it was decided by the Government of India to appoint Shri Niranjan Pant, Joint Secretary and Financial Adviser, Ministry of Water Resources as Enquiry Officer to hold enquiries into the affairs of India NPIM and submit his report to the Secretary, Ministry of Water Resources vides Notification No. 10/9 /2003 -Vig. , dated 13-5-2003;

2. इण्डिया एनपीआईएम का शासी निकाय के अध्यक्ष का पद कुछ समय के लिए चयन आधारित पद के रूप में समाप्त हो जाएगा और आयुक्त ( पीपी ) जल संसाधन मंत्रालय इसके बाद अगले निर्देश तक इण्डिया एनपीआईएम के पदेन अध्यक्ष के रूप में काम करते रहेंगे ।

357G1/04-9 636

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

निम्नलिखित सदस्यों को 24 दिसम्बर, 2003 से 1 वर्ष की अवधि के लिए स्थाई वित्त समिति के सदस्य के रूप में चुना है । And whereas the afore- said Enquiry Officer submitted his report to the Governemnt of India on 30-7-2003 and the said enquiry report has been considered by the Government and it has been decided to accept all the recommendations made in the report.

1. श्री जे.एन.एल. श्रीवास्तव , पूर्व सचिव ( ए एवं सी) 25, एन.आर.आई. कालोनी, मंदाकिनी, ग्रेटर कैलाश पार्ट -4, नईदिल्ली-110019

Now therefore , after consdering the findings and the recommendations of the enquiry officer and taking into account all the relevant facts and circumstances in its totality, the Government of India , in public interest, directs as under:

2. श्री सुधीर भार्गव, निदेशक,

ऐग्रोमैन सिस्टम प्रा.लि. , 25/2, तारदेव ए.सी. मार्केट, तारदेव, मुम्बई-400 034 ( महाराष्ट्र )

3. डा. शिव राज सिंह,

I. The term of second Governing Body of India NPIM expired on 17-01-2002 according to Rule 10.5 of the rules and Regulations of India NPIM. Therefore , the functioning of second Govering Body of India NPIM after 17-1-2002 is declared as illegal . All the decisions taken by this illegal body after the expiry of its origional term are also declared null and void.

15, भागीरथी कालोनी, सुन्दरपुर, वाराणासी ( उत्तर पद्रेश ) -221005 2. The post of the President of the Govering Body of India NPIM will cease to be an elective post for the time being the Commissioner ( PP) Ministry of Water Resources will henceforth function as ex - efficio President of India NPIM, until further directions .

4. डा. एस.ए. खानविल्कर, नन्दश्री अपार्टमेंट, ए-विंग , ब्लाक नं. 1 , होटल वृन्दावन के समीप , ताल उपोली, जिला रत्नागिरी , डपोली , महाराष्ट्र-415 712

5. डा. एस. नागराजन ,

3. In terms ofRule 9.3 of the rules and Regulations of India NPIM, the administration and the assets of the society shall immediately be taken over by the Commissioner ( PP ) Ministry of Water Resources on behalf of the Government of India, who will appropriately intimate the above to all concerned including the financial institutions where the accounts of the society are being operated .

निदेशक, भारतीय कृषि अनुसंधान संस्थान, पूसा, नई दिल्ली-110012

[फा. सं. 6 ( 1 ) /2003- गवर्नेस सैल ] 4. The Ex - officio President of India NPIM will appropriately appraise the decisions of the Government of India to the Registrar of the Society along -with an a thenticated copy of the report of the Enquiry Officer.

शशिमिश्रा, अपर सचिव

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

(Department of Agriculture Research and Education) (Indian Council of Agricultural Research)

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2004 5. The Ex - officio President of India NPIM shall conduct the election of the Governing Body of India NPIM strictry in accordance with the provisions of the Me as andum of Association and Rules and Regulations o." India NPIM with in a period of six months from the date of issue of this Notification , after consulting the Registrar of ti e Societics , if necessary.

6. Commissioner ( PP), Ministry of Water Resources being the new ex - officio President of the Society should take appropriate action on the recominendations of the enquiry officer , which has been accepted by the Government of India. (No. 10/6/2000 - CAD)

S.O. 340. In pursuance to Section 7 (2 ) of the A.P. Cess Act, 1940 and Regulation 2 (iv ) of the Standing Finance Committee Regulations framed by the Indian Council ofAgricultural Research, the Governing Body has elected the following of its Members to the Standing Finance Committee for a period of one year with effect from 24th December, 2003.-

[F.No. 10/6/2003 -Vig ] D. C. SAMANT, Addl . Secy.

कृषिमंत्रालय

( कृषिअनुसंधान और शिक्षा विभाग ) (भारतीय कृषि अनुसंधान परिषद्)

1. Shri J.N.L. Srivastava . Former Secretary ( A& C) , 25. NRI Colony, Mandakini, Greater Kailash Part IV, New Delhi 110019 .

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2004

2. Shri Sudhir Bhargava , Director,

Agroman System Pvt . Ltd. 25/2 , Tardeo Ac Market . Tardeo. Mumbai -400034,

का. आ. 340.- कृषि उत्पाद उपकर अधिनियम 1940 की धारा 7 ( 2 ) तथा भारतीय कृषि अनुसंधान परिषद् द्वारा निर्मित स्थाई वित्त समिति के विनियम 2 ( iv ) के अनुसरण में, शासी निकाय ने अपने [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3. Dr. Shiv Raj Singh, 15 , Bhagirathi Colony, Sundarpur, Varanasi 221005 .

4. Dr. S. A. Khanwilkar, Nandashree Apartment , A-wing Block No. 1 , Near Hotel Vrindavan , Tal Dapoli , District Ratnagiri, Dapoli , Maharashtra 415712 .

5. Dr. S. Nagarajan, Director, Indian Agricultural Research Institute , Pusa, New Delhi 110012 .

[F. No. 6 ( 1 )/2003-Gov. Cell. ] SHASHI MISRA , Addl . Secy.

पोत परिवहन मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 3 फरवरी , 2004

का. आ. 341. भारत सरकार, निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जहां 80% से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है और जो इस मंत्रालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण में है , राजभाषा (संघ के सरकारी उद्देश्य के लिए प्रयोग ) नियमावली, 1976 के नियम 10के उप नियम (4 ) के तहत अधिसूचित करती है : - मुख्य अभियन्ता एवं प्रशासक का कार्यालय अण्डमान लक्षद्वीप बन्दरगाह निर्माण कार्य पोर्ट ब्लेयर-744101

[फा. सं. ई. - 11011/1/2000- हिन्दी] आर. के. जैन, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF SHIPPING

New Delhi , the 3rd February, 2004

S.O. 341. In pursuance of sub rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for the Official Purpose of the Union) Rule , 1976, the Government of India hereby notified the following office under the administrative control of theMinistry of Shipping where more than 80% of staff have acquired working knowledge in Hindi:-

Office of the Chief Engineer & Administrator Andaman Lakshadweep Harbour Works PortBlair-744101 .

637

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

( ii) तारीख 11 जनवरी , 2003 में भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन कोयला और खान मंत्रालय ( कोयला विभाग ) की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 80, तारीख 3 जनवरी , 2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 3100.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 7660.10 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है, कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है , कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्य है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में यथावर्णित 421.70 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1042.02 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की भूमि और ऐसी भूमि में या उस सब पर के अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ; टिप्पण 1:

- इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र को रेखांक सं. सी. - 1 ( ई ) III /जे जे एम आर/ 710-1103 , तारीख 4 नवम्बर, 2003 का निरीक्षण, कलेक्टर , चन्द्रपुर (महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता ( पिन -700001 ) केकार्यालय में या वेस्टर्न कोल्फील्ड्स लिमिटेड, ( राजस्व विभाग ) कोल इस्टेट, सिविल लाइन्स, नागपुर-440001 (महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकेगा। टिप्पण 2 :-कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विभाग ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध हैं :-

अर्जन की बाबत आपत्तियां-

8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरण:-इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

[ F. No. E - 11011/1 /2000-Hindi |

R. K. JAIN , Jl . Secy.

कोयला मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 29 जनवरी , 2004

का. आ. 342.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 (1957 का 20 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( i ) के अधीन जो भारत के राजपत्र , भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड (2) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम प्राधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी सुनवाइयों का सुने जाने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच, यदिकोई हो, करने के पश्चात्, जो वह आवश्यक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस परके अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा । [PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

638

( 3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता, यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी उक्त भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं ।

टिप्पण :-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने अधिनियम के अधीन कोयला नियंत्रक,

225, 226, 227/1 , 227/1 , 228, 229 , 230, 231 , 232. 233 , 234, 235. 236, 237 , 238 , 239 , 240, 241/1 , 241/2-241/3, 242/1 , 242/2 , 242/3, 243, 244/1, 244/2, 245/1 क, 245/ 1 ख, 245/2, 246, 248. 249, 250, 264, 265, 267, 268. 269, 270 , 271 , 272/1 , 272/2 , 273/1 . 273/2, 274/1 , 274/2 , 274/3 , 274/4 , 274/5, 287, 288/ 1.288/2 . 289, 290/1 , 291 , 292, 293, 294, 295 , 296, 297, 298 , 299, 300 , 301, 302, 303 , 311 , 312, 315/1 , 315/2 , 316 , 317/1 , 317/2 , 318 , 319, 440/1 , 440/2, 440/3, 443,445.

सीमा वर्णन:

1 काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 को सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त किया है जिसे अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 2519 , तारीख 27 मई, 1983 के भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ), तारीख 11 जून, 1983 को प्रकाशित किया गया था।

अनुसूची एकोणा ओपन कास्ट खंड माजरी क्षेत्र

जिला चंद्रपुर ( महाराष्ट्र )

(रेखांक सं. सी-1 ( ई )/ III जेजेएमआर/ 710-1103 तारीख 4नवम्बर, 2003 )

सभी अधिकार

टिप्पणी

तहसील जिला

क्र. ग्राम का नाम

क्षेत्र हेक्टेयर

पटवारी सर्किल

सं.

में

सं.

चंद्रपुर 187.37 भाग

वरोरा

1. एकोणा

क- ख : रेखा बिन्दु क से आरंभ होती है और मार्डा से होकर गुजरती हुई तथा प्लॉट संख्या 311 , 318 , 317/1 , 317/2, 319, 293 , 291 , 290/1 , 289 , 288/1-288 /2 , 287 , 274/1 , 274/2 , 274/3, 274/4, 274/5 , 240 , 239 , 238, 236, 235 की बाहरी सीमा के साथ- साथ जाती है और सड़क पार करते हुए प्लॉट संख्या 75/ख, 75/क, 89 , 440/1 , 440/2 ,440/3 , 77/2, 77/3 , 78/1 , 79/1 , 79/2, 79/3 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरते हुए ग्राम मार्डा और ग्ग्रम एकोणा की सम्मिलित सीमा को पार करती है और ग्राम एकोणा से होते हुए प्लॉट संख्या 163 /घ, 163/ग, 163/क, 162 की बाहरी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है तथा सड़क्त पार करते हुए प्लॉट संख्या 186 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ जाती है, पुनः सड़क पार करते हुए प्लॉट संख्या 187, 188 , 189, 195 , 194/1 , 194/4 , 194/2 , 194/3 , 201/1 , 202 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ- साथ जाती हुई बिंदु ख पर मिलती है ।

234.33 भाग

चंद्रपुर

वरोरा

2. मार्डा

कुल क्षेत्र : 421.70 हेक्टर ( लगभग )

या

रेखा ग्राम एकोणा से होकर जाती है और प्लॉट संख्या ख-ग : 202, 203, 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 276, 277 , 278 , 279, 280 , 281 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ जाती है और बिन्दु' ग ' पर मिलती है ।

1042.02 एकड़ ( लगभग )

ग्राम एकोड़ा में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक:-

ग- घ : रेखा ग्राम एकोणा से होकर जाती है और प्लॉट संख्या 281, 272 , 273 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ - साथ जाती है और सड़क पार करती है फिर प्लॉट संख्या 270, 269, 268 , 238 , 237, 130 , 129 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ- साथ जाती है और बिन्दु ' घ' पर मिलती है । 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 136, 137, 138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142 , 143, 144, 145 , 146, 147, 148, 149 , 150, 151/1 , 151/2 , 152 , 153, 154 , 155/1 , 155/2 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160, 161 , 162 , 163/क, 163/ख , 163/ग, 163/ष, 186, 187, 188 , 189 , 194/1 , 194/2 , 194/3 , 194/4, 195 , 196, 197 , 198/1 , 198/2 , 199/2 199/ 2क , 199/2 ख , 200 , 201/1 , 201/2 , 202, 203 , 204, 205, 206, 207, 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217/1 , 217/2 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226, 227, 228/1 , 228/2 , 229, 230 , 231/1 , 231/2, 232, 234/1 , 234/2 , 235, 236, 237 , 238 , 268, 269 , 270, 272, 273 , 274, 275, 276 , 277, 278, 279 , 280, 281 , 296

ग्राम मार्डी में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक:

75/क, 75/ख , 77/ 1 ग, 77/ख, 77/2, 77/3 , 78/1 , 72, 78/3 ,

घ-क : रेखा ग्राम एकोणा से होकर जाती है तथा प्लॉट संख्या 129 , 133, 139 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ- साथ जाते हुए ग्राम एकोणा और ग्राम मार्डा की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है तथा ग्राम मार्डा से होकर प्लॉट संख्या 125 , 107/ 3, 108 , 109 , 111/1 , 111/2 , 112 , 115, 114, 94, 93 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ जाती है और सड़क पार करती है तथा प्लॉट संख्या 226, 225, 223 , 222 , 221 , 220 , 246 , 248, 249, 250, 269, 268 , 267, 265, 264, 303, 315/2 , 312, 311 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु ' क' पर मिलती है ।

66,87, 79/1, 79/2 , 79/3 , 80 , 81/ 1,81/2/ 1 , 81/2/ 2,8283,84,

[संख्या 43015/11/2002- पी० आर० आई० डब्ल्यू] 88, 89, 90/1 , 90/2 , 91 , 92/1 , 92/2 , 92/3 , 93 , 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99,

100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107/1 , 107/2 , 107/3 , 108, 109,

संजय बहादुर, निदेशक 110, 111/1 , 111/2, 112, 113 , 114 , 115 , 125, 220, 221 , 222, 223 , 639

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 29th January, 2004

issued may. within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land.

Explanation-

Itshall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by theCentral Government or by any other person .

S.O. 342. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Coal and Mines(Department of Coal ) number S.O. 80 dated the 3rd January, 2003 , published in the Gazette of India. Part - II . Section 3. Sub-Section (ii ) dated the 11th January, 2003 underSub -Section (i ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 3100.00 hectares ( approximately ) or 7660.10 acres (approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification ;

And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of said lands described in the Schedules appended to this notification ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1 ) of section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the lands measuring 421.70 hectares (approximately) or 1042.02 acres (approximately) and All Rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule appended hereto;

(2) Every objection under Sub- section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing and the competent authority shall give the objector anopportunity ofbeing heard either in person orbya legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further enquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, eithermake a report in respect of the land which has been notified under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government , containing his recommendations on the objections , together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of that Government .

(3) For the purpose of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act . " Note 1: Theplan bearing No. C - 1 (E) III/ JJMR/ 710-1103 dated the 4th November, 2003 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector , Chandrapur (Maharashtra) or in the office of the Coal Controller , 1 Council House Street , Kolkata (PIN 700 001) or in the office of the Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department ), Coal Estate , Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440 001 (Maharashtra).

Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) which provides as follows:-

Objections to Acquisition :

Note 3 : The Coal Controller. 1, Council House Street , Kolkata- 700 001 , has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority urrder the Act , vide notification number S.O. 2519, dated the 27th May, 1983 , published in Part II , Section 3, Sub-section (ii ) of the Gazette ofIndia, dated the 11th June , 1983 .

"8. (1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been

SCHEDULE

YEKONA OPENCAST BLOCK

MAJRI AREA

DISTRICT- CHANDRAPUR (MAHARASHTRA )

(Plan No. C- I (E)/III/ JJMR/ 710-1103 dated the 4th November, 2003 ).

AllRights

Remarks

District

Tahsil

Area in Hectares SI. No.

Name of village

Patwari circle number

Chandrapur

Yekona

Part Part

187.37 234.33

Warora Warora

Chandrapur

Marda

01. 02.

Total area: 421.70 hectares (approximately) or 1042.02 acres

(approximately) 640

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Yekona :---

129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141 , 142, 143 , 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151/1 , 151/2 , 152, 153 , 154, 155/1 , 155/2, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161 , 162, 163 /A, 163 /B , 163/C, 163/D , 186. 187, 188 , 189, 194/1 , 194/2 , 194/3 , 194/4, 195, 196, 197, 198/1 , 198/2 , 199/1 , 199 /2A, 199/2B . 200. 201/1 , 201/2, 202, 203 , 204, 205, 206 , 207, 208, 209 , 210, 211 , 212 , 213 , 214, 215, 216, 217/1 , 217/2 , 218 , 219, 220 , 221 , 222, 223 , 224, 225, 226, 227 , 228/1 , 228/2 , 229, 230 , 231/1 , 23 1/2 , 232 , 234/1 , 234/2 , 235 , 236, 237, 238, 268, 269, 270, 272, 273 , 274,275 , 276, 277 , 278 , 279, 280 , 281 , 296 .

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Marda :-

75 /A, 75 /B , 77/1 A, 77 / 1B , 77 / 1C, 77/2 , 77/3 , 78/1 , 78/2 , 78/3 , 79/1 , 79/2 , 79/3 , 80 , 81/1 , 81/2/1 , 81/2/2 , 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 , 89 , 90/1 , 90/2 , 91 , 92/1 , 92/2 , 92/3 , 93, 94, 95 , 96, 97, 98, 99 , 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105, 106 , 107/1 , 107/2, 107/3 , 108 , 109, 110, 111/1 , 111/2 , 112, 113, 114, 115 , 125, 220 , 221 , 222, 223 , 225 , 226, 227/1 , 227/2, 228 , 229 , 230, 231 , 232, 233 , 234, 235 , 236, 237, 238 , 239, 240, 241/1 , 241/2 , 241/3 , 242/1 , 242/2, 242/3, 243, 244/1 , 244/2 , 245/ 1A, 245/ 1B, 245/2, 246, 248, 249, 250, 264, 265 , 267, 268 , 269 , 270, 271 , 272/1 , 272/2 , 273/ 1,273/2 , 274/1 , 274/2 , 274/3 , 274/4, 274/5, 287, 288/1 , 288/2 , 289 , 290/1 , 291 , 292, 293 , 294. 295 . 296. 297. 298. 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 311 , 312, 315/1 , 315/2, 316 , 317/1 , 317/2, 318 , 319, 440/1 , 440/2 , 440/3 , 443,445.

Boundary description :-

A-B : Line starts from point ' A' and passes through village Marda and passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 311 , 318, 317/1 , 317/2 , 319, 293 , 291 , 290/ 1,289, 288/ 1,288/2 , 287 , 274/1 , 274/2, 274/3 , 274/4,274/5 , 240, 239, 238, 236, 235, crosses road then passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 75 /B , 75/A, 89 , 440/1 , 440/2 , 440/3 , 77/2 , 77/3 , 78/1 , 79/1 , 79/2 , 79/3, crosses common village boundary ofvillage Marda and Yekona then proceeds through village Yekona along the outer boundary of plot numbers 163 /D, 163 /C, 163/B, 163/A, 162, crosses road then passes along the outer boundary of plot number 186, crosses road then passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 187, 188 , 189, 195 , 194/1 , 194/4 , 194/2 , 194/3 , 201/1 , 202 and meets at point 'B' .

B-C Line passes through village Yekona and passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 202, 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207, 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280, 281 and meets at point 'C' .

CD Line passes through village Yekona and passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 281 , 272, 273 , crosses road then proceeds along the outer boundary of plot numbers 270, 269 , 268, 238, 237 , 130 , 129 and meets at point -D' .

D-A Line passes through village Yekona and passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 129 ,

[PART II-SEC, 3(ii)] 133 , 139, crosses common village boundary of village Yekona and Marda then proceeds through village Marda along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 125, 107/3 , 108, 109, 111/1 , 111/2, 112, 115, 114 , 94, 93 , crosses road then passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 226, 225 , 223 , 222 , 221, 220, 246 , 248, 249, 250, 269, 268, 267, 265, 264, 303 , 315/2, 312, 311 and meets atstarting point ' A' ,

[No. 43015/ 11/2002/PRIW]

SANJAY BAHADUR, Director नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2004

का०आ० 343.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 8 फरवरी , 2003 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के कोयला विभाग की अधिसूचना संख्या 467 , तारीख 31 जनवरी , 2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी । और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण मेंकेन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और झारखंड सरकार से परामर्श के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में दर्शित 475.40 एकड ( लगभग ) या 192.46 हैक्टर ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि अर्जित की जानी चाहिए । अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 475.40 एकड़ ( लगभग ) या 192.46 हैक्टर ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि अर्जित की जाती है । इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या राजस्व 11/2003 तारीख 5 जून, 2003 का निरीक्षण उपायुक्त हजारीबाग झारखंड के कार्यालय या कोयला नियंत्रक 1 काउन्सिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता में या सेन्ट्रल कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) दरभंगा हाउस रांची ( झारखंड ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

अनुसूची

केदलाझारखंड ब्लाक विस्तार

(वेस्ट बोकारो कोलफील्ड्स) जिला हजारीबाग ( झारखंड )

रेखांक सं. राजस्व/11/2003

तारीख 5जून, 2003 (सभी अधिकार )

(अर्जित की गई भूमि को दर्शाते हुए)

टिप्पणियां

हैक्टेयर थाना

थाना जिला

क्र. ग्राम

एकड़

मेंक्षेत्र में क्षेत्र

संख्यांक

सं.

192.46 भाग

160 हजारीबाग 475.40

माण्डु

केदला

कुल क्षेत्र: 475.40 192.46 ( लगभग ) 641 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

त

केदला ग्राम अर्जित की गई प्लांट संख्या:

-क: रेखा ग्राम केदला और इचाकडीह ( जो का० आ० 3687 तारीख 20-10-81 कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन एवं विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 की धारा 9 ( 1 ) के अधीन अर्जित परेज ब्लॉक विस्तार की सम्मिलित सीमा के भाग रूप है ) से गुजरती है और बिंदु ' क' पर मिलती है ।

[सं० 43015/22/2000/पीआरआईडब्ल्यू] संजय बहादुर, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 5th February, 2004

S.O. 343. Whereas by the notification of the Government ofIndia in the Ministry of Coal and Mines number S.O. 467 dated the 31st January, 2003 , published in the Gazette ofIndia, dated the 8th February, 2003, under sub -section( 1) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 ( 20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule appended to that notification.

9, 10, 13, 15 , 16, 24 ( भाग ), 33, 41 , 43 ( भाग ) , 45, 55 (भाग ), 73 , 75 (भाग ) , 345 ( भाग ) , 371 ( भाग ) , 392 (भाग ), 393, 394, 395, 396 , 397, 398 , 399, 400, 401, 402 (भाग) , 403 (भाग ), 404 ( भाग ) , 405 ( भाग ) , 406 ( भाग) , 408 (भाग ) ,419 ( भाग ) , 420 ( भाग ) , 421 ( भाग ) , 422 ( भाग ) , 423 ( भाग) , 424,425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431 , 432, 433,434, 435,436,437,438, 439,440,441, 442,443,444, 445,446,447,448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459,460,461 , 462, 463,464,465,466,467,468, 469,470,471 , 472,473,474, 475, 476, 477(भाग) ,478( भाग), 483 (भाग) , 485(भाग), 486, 487 (भाग) ,488(भाग, 498(भाग) , 499, 500, 501 , 502, 503, 504, 505, 506(भाग) , 510(भाग), 511 , 512, 513(भाग) , 516(भाग) , 517(भाग) , 518(भाग), 519(भाग), 520, 521,522,523,524(भाग) , 525 (भाग) , 526( भाग), 620(भाग) , 741 (भाग) , 756, 773,781,783,785,789, 712(भाग) , 803 ( भाग), 810( भाग) , 1199 (भाग) और 1205 (भाग) .

सीमा वर्णन:

And whereas the competent authority, in pursuance of section 8 of the said Act , has made his report to the Central Government .

क-खः रेखा बिन्दु ' क ' से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम केदला से प्लॉट संख्या 24, 43 , 50, 49, 67, 75 , 76 और 75 (केदला बंजी सड़क की सम्मिलित सीमा के साथ- साथ ) से होकर जाती है और बिंदु ' ख ' पर मिलती है ।

Andwhereas the Central Government after considering the report aforesaid and after consulting the Government of Jharkhand is satisfied that the lands measuring 475.40 acres (approx. ) or 192.46 hectares (approx. ) described in the Schedule appended hereto should be acquired.

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 9 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the lands measuring 475.40 acres ( approx. ) or 192.46 hectares (approx. ) described in the said Schedule are hereby acquired.

ख-ग-घ-ड-च-छ: रेखा ग्राम केदला प्लॉट संख्या 75, 76 , 353, 371 , 352 , 371 , 349, 345, 342, 371 , 620 और 1205 से होकर जाती है ( जो का० आ ० सं.० 3687 तारीख 20-10-81 कोयलां धारक क्षेत्र अर्जन एवं विकास अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 9 ( 1 ) के अधीन अर्जित परेज विस्तार ब्लौक की सम्मिलित सीमा का भाग रूप है से गुजरती है और ' छ ' पर मिलती है ।

छ-ज: रेखा केदला और लईयो ग्रामों की सम्मिलित सीमा से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' ज ' पर मिलती है ।

The plan No. Rev./1 1/2003 dated the 5th June , 2003 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh , Jharkhand or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata or in the office of the Central Coalfields Ltd. , (Revenue Section) , Darbhanga House , Ranchi , Jharkhand.

SCHEDULE Kedla Jharkhand Block Extension (West Bokaro Coalfields) District : Hazaribagh, ( Jharkhand ) Drg. No. Rev/ 11 /2003 Dt. 5-6-2003

(All Right)

(Showing land acquired) ज-झ-ज-ट-ठ-ड-ह- ण: रेखा ग्राम केदला से प्लॉट संख्या 1199 , 1196, 1199, 620, 594, 595, 601 , 600, 371,601, 598, 590, 589, 590 , 589, 590 , 371,477, 478 , 488, 487, 498 , 506 , 510, 513 , 518 , 519, 525, 526, 525, 423, 422, 419, 371 और 369 ( जो का० आ० 1754 तारीख 15-06-96 कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन एवं विकास) अधिनियम 1957 की धारा 9 ( 1 ) के अधीन अर्जित केदला झारखंड विस्तार ब्लॉक की सम्मिलित सीमा के भाग रूप है से गुजरती है और बिंदु ' ण ' पर मिलती है ।

Sl. Village Thana Thana District Area in Area in Re- Number No. Acres Haс- marks tares

1 2

1 . Kedla Mandu 160 Hazaribagh 475.40 192.46 Part

Tolal area 475.40 acres ( approximately ) 192.46 hectares ( approximately) : रेखा ग्राम केदला से प्लॉट संख्या 369 , 367 , 741 , 810, 803, 801 , 792 और 795 ( जो का०आ ० 1754 तारीख 15-06-96 कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन एवं विकास) अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 1 ) के अधीन अर्जित केदला झारखंड विस्तार ब्लौक की सम्मिलित सीमा के भाग रूप है से गुजरती है और बिंदु ' त ' पर मिलती है । ण-त 642

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

Plot numbers acquired in village Kedla:

9 , 10, 13 , 15 , 16 , 24(Part) , 33 , 41 , 43(Part), 45, 55(Part) , 73, 75 (Part) , 345 (Part), 371 (Part) , 392 (Part ), 393, 394 , 395, 396, 397 , 398, 399, 400 401, 402(Part), 403 (Part) . 404 , 405 , 406 (Part ), 408 , 419 (Part), 420 (Part) , 421 (Part) , 422 (Part) , 423 (Part) , 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431 , 432, 433 , 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441 , 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451 , 452, 453 , 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459,460, 461 , 462, 463,464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470 , 471 , 472 , 473,474, 475 , 476 , 477 (Part ) , 478 (Part ), 483 (Part) , 485(F'art), 486, 487(Part) , 488(Part), 498 (Part) ,499, 500, 501 , 502, 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 (Part), 510(Part) , 511 , 512 , 513 (Part ) , 516 (Part) , 517, 518 (Part ), 519(Part) , 520, 521 , 522, 523 , 524(Part) , 525(Part ) , 526(Part) , 620(Part) , 741 ( Part ) , 756 , 773 , 781 , 783 , 785 , 789, 792 (Part ) , 803 (Part) , 810 (Part) , 1199(Part) and 1205(Part ).

Boundary Description :

A-B: Line starts from ' A' and passes through plot nos . 24,43,50,49,67,75,76 & 75 in village Kedla (along common boundary of Kedla Banji Road ) and meets at point " B "

B -C-D -E -F-G: Lines pass through plot nos. 75, 76, 353,371 , 352 , 371 , 349 , 345 , 342 , 371 , 620 and 1205 in village Kedla ( which forms part common boundary of Parej Extn . Block U/ s 9 (1 ) of C.B.A ( A & D ) Act , 1957 vide , S.O. No. 3687 dt . 20.10.81 ) and meets at point'G'.

G-H : Line passes through common boundary of villageKedla & Loiyo and meets at point 'H ' .

H-I -J - K- L: Lines pass through plot nos . 1199 , 1196, 1199, 620,594, 595 , 601,600,371.

M-N -O : 601 , 598,590,589 , 590, 371 , 477, 478 , 485 , 488 , 487, 498 , 506, 510, 513 , 516, 518 , 519, 526, 524, 525, 423 , 422 , 419 , 371 & 369 in village Kedla (which forms part common boundary of Kedla Jharkhand Block U/ s 9 ( 1 ) of CBA (A& D) Act , 1957 vide S.O. No. 1754 dt . 15.6.96) and meets at point 'O ' .

O-P : Line passes through plot nos . 369, 367 , 741,810, 803, 801, 792 and 795 in village Kedla (which forms part common boundary of Kedla Jharkhand Block U/s 9 ( 1 ) of C.B.A. (A & D) Act, 1957 vide . S. O. No. 1754 dt . 15-6-96) and meet at point 'P ' .

P- A Line passes through, common boundary of village Kedla and Ichakdih (which forms part commonboundary of Parej Extn. Block U/s . 9 ( 1 ) of C. B. A. (A & B) Act , 1957 vide S.O. No. 3687 dt . 20-10-81 ) and meets at starting point 'A' .

[No. 43015/22/ 2000 -PRIW] SANJAY BAHADUR, Director.

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी, 2004

का०आ० 344.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, कोयला पारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2 , खंड ( 3 ) उपखंड (ii ) तारीख 16 अगस्त, 2003 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. सं. 2331 तारीख 16 अगस्त, 2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 256.04 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) है, कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी,

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 256.04 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) माप की भूमि में और ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकारों का अर्जन करने केअपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।

टिप्पण 1 : इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. ई.सी.एल./हुरा/मौजा/05 तारीख 28-9-2003 का निरीक्षण उप आयुक्त, जिला-गोड्डा ( झारखंड ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता 700001 के कार्यालय में या निदेशक तकनीकी ( संचालन ) , ईस्टर्न कोलफील्डस लि. सेंक्टोरिया, डाकघर- दिसेरगढ़ , जिला- बर्दमान ( प. बंगाल ) ( पिन कोड -713333 ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

टिप्पण 2 : कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध है:-

8 अर्जन के प्रति आक्षेप:-

( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है, हितबद्ध है, अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमिया उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आक्षेप कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरण: इस धारा के अंतर्गत यह आक्षेप नहीं माना जाएगा कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करनी चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्तिको नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

(2) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आक्षेप सक्षम अधिकारी का लिखित रूप में किया जाएगा और सक्षम अधिकारी आक्षेपकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसे सभी आक्षेपों को 643 भारत कोराजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004 /माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

मौजा- रक्षाकिट्टा संख्या -714 में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाद संख्या

164, 165, 166, 167, 168 , 169, 170, 171 , 172, 173, 174, 175, 176,177, 178, 179, 180, 181 , 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 200, 201 , 202, 203 , 204, 205, 206, 207 , 208, 209, 210, 211, 212 , 213 , 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226,227, 228, 229, 230, 231 , 232 233 234 235, 236, 237, 240 (भाग ) ,

मौज़ा-हुमरियाः संख्या-1 में अर्जितकिए जाने वाले प्लाटा संख् सुनने के पश्चात औरहसी अतिरिक्त जांच यदि कोई हो, करने के पश्चात जो यह आवश्यक समझता है वह या तो धास की व्यारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के सा ऐसी भूमिमें या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट ला ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में सा. उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आक्षेपों पर अपनी सिफारिशें और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चिय के लिए देगा ।

(3) इस धारा के प्रत्योवानों को लिए वह काषित किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रक्षिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता वधि भूमि पर किसी भूमि में या उस घर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं । "

टिप्पण 3: केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक 1 , कार्डसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता -700001 को उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

भूमिअनुसूची हुरा-सी प्रोजेक्ट ( राजमहल क्षेत्र )

टिप्पणियां

जिला क्षेत्र

थाना थाना

क्रम मौजा/ग्राम

हेक्टेयर

स. का नाम सं

में

भाग

महागामा गोड्डा 8.27

रबियाडीह 713

۲۰

भाग

714. महागामा गोड्डा 14.91

2. रक्षाकिट्टा

भाग

01 बी.डब्लू- गोड्डा 165.67

3. डुमरिया

सिमरा

भाग

4. हारकट्टी 04 बी.डब्लू गोड्‌डा 8:32

सिमरा

भाग

पंचरूखी

गोड्डा 60.87

14 बी.डब्लू- सिमरा

कुल- 256.04 हैक्टेयर ( अनुमानित)

भूमिअनुसूची

हुरा " सी"प्रोजेक्ट, राजमहल कोलफील्डस

मौजा-रबियाडीह संख्या-713 में अर्जित किएजाने वालेप्लाट

संख्या

185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 196, 197,

198, 199, 200, 201 , 202, 203 , 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211 , 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221 , 222, 223 ,

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, 10, 11 , 12 , 13 , 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 39, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 45/1228, 46, 47, 48, 49,50, 51, 52, 53 , 54, 54/1229, 55, 56, 57, 58, 64 ( भाग ), 65,66, 67,68,69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76,77, 78, 79,80, 81, 82,83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90,91, 92, 93,94, 95, 96,97,98,9 100,101, 102, 103, 104,105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111 , 112, 1:13, 114, 115, 116( भाग), 116/1230, 116/1234, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125, 126, 127; 135(भाग ) , 171, 172, 174,175,176,177,178,179, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201,202,203, 204,205, 206, 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212, 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217, 218, 219, 220, 221 ,222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 287; 228, 229, 230, 231 , 232, 233 , 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 , 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251 , 252, 253 , 254, 255, 256,257,258,259,260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281 , 282,283, 284, 285 , 286, 287, 288 , 289, 290, 291, 292, 293,294, 295, 296, 297, 298 , 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308,309,310, 311 , 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318 319,320, 321,322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331 , 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341 , 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347,348, 349, 350, 351 , 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357,358,359, 360, 361,362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 3,71,372, 373,374,375,376, 377 , 378, 379, 380, 381,382, 383, 384, 385, 386,387,388,389, 390 , 391 , 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,397, 398, 399, 400, 401 , 402,403, 404, 405,406 , 407,408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413 , 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421 , 421/1235, 422,423, 424,425,426, 427, 428 , 429, 429/1236, 430, 431 , 432,433,434, 435, 436, 437,438, 439, 440, 441, 442,443,444, 445,446,447, 448,449, 450, 451 , 452, 453 ,454, 455,458,459, 460,461 , 462, 463 , 464,481 (भाग ) ,482 ( भाग ),489(भाग) ,492, 493,494, 495, 496, 497 , 498, 499, 500, 501 , 502 , 503 , 504, 505 , 506, 507, 508, 509, 510 , 511 , 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521 , 522, 523 , 524, 525, 526,527 , 528, 529 530,531 , 532, 533 , 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541 , 542, 543,543/1238, 544, 545, 546, 547 , 548, 549, 550, 551 , 552, 553,554,555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561,562, 563,564, 565, 566, 567, 568, 569, 570, 571, 572 , 573, 574,575, 576, 577. 578,579,580,581,582, 583 , 584, 585, 586, 587,588,589,590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595( भाग ) , 595/1294, 732 ( भाग) , 879, 880, 880/1239,881,882, 883,884, 885,886, 890,891,892,893, 894,895,896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901,902, 903, 904, 905 , 906, 907, 908 , 909, 910, 911,912 , 913 , 914, 915 , 916, 917, 918 , 919, 920, 921 , 922 , 923,924,925 , 926, 927,928,929. 930,931, 932, 933,934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940,996( भाग ) , 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230 , 231 , 232, 233, 234, 235.

357GI/04-10 644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

[PART HSEC. 3( )]

सीमा विवरण

1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1014( भाग ) , 1015 ( খাল ) , 1043,1044,

ב-וש

1046, 1047, 1048,

1016( भाग ), 1017 ( भाग ) , 1040( भाग ) , 1041( भाग), 1042, 1049, 1050, 1051 , 1052, 1053 , 1054,

1045, 1055 , 1058,

1057, 1059, 1061 ,

1060, 1062, 1063 , 1064, 1065,

1066, 1057, 1068, 1069, 1071 ,

1070, 1072 , 1073 , 1074, 1075,

1076, 1077, 1078 , 1079, 1080, 1081, 1082, 1083, 1084, 1085,

रेखा गोचा- रविमावीह संख्या 713 के प्लाट संख्या 194के पश्चिमी और दक्षिणी विन्तु से आरम्भ होती है और प्लाट संख्या 195 की दक्षिणी रेखा के साथ-साथ आधी है और ए-३ किन्तु परमिलती है । 1086. 1087. 1088, 1089, 1090, 1091 , 1092, 1093, 1094,1095,

ए2-ए३

1096, 1097, 1098, 1099, 1100, 1101 , 1102, 1103, 1104 , 1105,

1106,1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115,

1116, 1117, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125,

1126, 11:27 , 1128, 1129, 1130, 1131 , 1132, 1133 , 1134, 1135,

1136, 1137, 1138 , 1139, 1140, 1141 , 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145,

रेखा भौजा-तेतारिया संख्या -31 और रजियाडीह संख्या-713 को संयुक्त सीमा रेखा से होकर जाती है तथा गौणा - या संध्या-31 वाडी संख्या-713 और चुनरिया संक -1 फी त्रिसीमारेखा के ए-३ बिन्दु परमिलती है ।

1146, 11:46/1240, 1147, 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151 , 1152 , 1153,

1154, 1155, 1156. 1157, 1158, 1159, 1160, 1161 , 1162,1163,

1164, 1165, 1166 , 1167, 1168, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173,

1174, 1175, 1176.1177, 1178 (भाग), 1179, 1180, 1181, 1182,

1183, 1184, 1185, 1186, 1187, 1188, 1189, 1191, 1192.1193,

1194. 1195, 1196, 1197, 1198, 1199 , 1200, 1201 , 1202, 1203,

रेखा भीमा-तेतारिया संख्या-31 और सुमरिया संख्या-1 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा से होकर जाती है तथा भीजा-तैशारिया संख्या-31 , डुमरिया संख्या-1 और बहादपुर संख्या-32 की त्रिसीमा रेखा के ए-4 बिन्दुपर मिलती है।

1204, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1211 , 1213, 1214,

1215, 1216, 1217. 1218; 1219, 1220, 1221 , 1222, 1223 , 1224, ए4-25

1225 , 1226.

रेखा मौथा पहाड़पुर संख्या-32 और डुमरिया संख्या- 1 की संयुक्त सीमा के साथ जाती है और मौजा पहाड़पुर डुमरिया और पांचरूखी की सीमा रेखा के ए-5 बिन्दु परमिलती है ।

भोजा- हारक‌ट्टा संख्या-4 में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या

ए5-ए6 रेखा मौजा-पहाड़पुर संख्या-32 और पांचरूखी संख्या- 14 की संयुक्त सीमा के साथ जाती है और ए-6 बिन्दु परमिलती है ।

35.4 ( भाग),496 497, 498 , 499, 300, 501 , 502 , 503 , 504, 505,506,507, 508 , 509 , 510, 511 , 515,516 , 517, 518 , 519,520, 521,522,523,

ए6 -ए7- ए४

मोजा-पंचरूखी संख्या-14 में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या

रेखा मौजा पांचरूखी संख्या14 प्लाट संख्या 127 , 141, 249 की पश्चिमी दक्षिणी और पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है और मौजा-पांचरुखी संख्या-14 और पहाड़पुर संख्या-32 कीसंयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ जाती है और मौजा पांचरूखी के प्लाट संख्या 298 की पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है और ए-8 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए४-११ - ए10 रेखा मौजा पांचरूखी संख्या14 के प्लाट संख्या-298 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है , और मौजा पांचरूखी संख्या-14 के प्लाट संख्या 302 की दक्षिणी उत्तरी और पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है , रेखा प्लाट संख्या 306 की पश्चिमी दक्षिणी और पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है , मौजा पांचरूखी संख्या-14 और पहाड़पुर संख्या-32 के संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ - साथ जाती है और ए-10 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए10-ए11 रेखा मौजा पांचरूखी संख्या 14 के प्लाट संख्या- और ए-11 बिन्दु पर मिलती है । 326 के पश्चिमी और दक्षिणी रेखा के साथ जाती है

ए11-ए12

244. 245, 246, 247 , 248 , 250, 251 , 252, 253 , 254 , 255 ,

256. 257, 258 , 259, 260 , 261 , 262, 263 , 264, 265 , 266,

रेखा मौजा पांचरूखी संख्या-14 के प्लाट संख्या-282 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है और ए-12 बिन्दु पर मिलती है।

267 , 268. 269 , 270 , 271 , 272, 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 ,

ए12-ए13

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 , 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 1.20 21.22.23.24. 25. 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33 , 34, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 41/342, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 12.3.54.55, 56 , 57, 58, 59, 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64, 65, 66.67. 69, 70, 71 , 72, 73,74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 86 87 88.89, 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94, 95 , 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 , 101, 102, 103 , 104 , 105, 106 , 107 , 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113, 114, 115, 116 , 117, 118 , 119, 120, 121, 122, 123 , 124 , 125, 126, 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133,134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139,140, 142, 143 , 144 , 145, 146, 147, 148 , 149, 150, 151 , 152, 153, 154,155, 156 , 157, 158, 159 , 160 , 161 , 162, 163, 164, 165, 156, 167, 168, 169 , 170, 171 , 172, 173 , 174, 175, 176, 177, 178 , 179, 180, 181 , 182, 183 , 184, 185, 186, 187, 188 , 189, 190, 191, 92, 193,194, 195, 196, 197, 198 , 199 , 2000, 201 , 202 ,203, 204, 205, 206, 207 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213 , 214 , 215, 216, 217 , 218, 219, 220, 221 , 222, 223, 224, 225 , 226 , 227, 228, 229, 230, 231,232,233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 , 239, 240, 241 , 242,243 , 278. 279 , 283 , 284, 285, 286 , 287 , 288 , 292, 293 , 294.295,296, 297 , 299, 300, 301 , 303 , 304, 305, 307 , 308, 309, 310,311,312,313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 343.

रेखा मौजा- पांचरूखी संख्या -14 के प्लाट संख्या-282 के पूर्वी, उत्तरी एवं पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है और ए-13 बिन्दु पर मिलती है । [भाग - म 3 (1 ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र फरवरी 14, 2004/ माथ 25, 1925

645

21-222

ए13-ए14 रेखा दौसा- पांची संख्या-14 के छात्र संचना -282 के उसरी वहिनी एवं अम्रित्री देखा के जाल जाती है और ए-14 विन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए14-15 रेखा मौला गांधी संख्या-14 और चुनरिया संस्ता -1 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ जाती है और ए -15 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए15-16 रेखा सौचा- बुमरिया संख्या-1 के आर मंच-1178 से होकर आती है, प्लान 1178 और दक्षिणी रेखा के साथ जामी है, फतह जंक्रया 732 से होकर जाती है गौर 1227 के पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है और ए-16 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

रेखा मौजा- डुमरिया संख्या-1 के प्लाट संख्या -601 , 600 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है , प्लाट संख्या 597, 596 की दक्षिणी रेखा से होकर जाती है , प्लाट संख्या- 481, 482, 489 से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 491 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या -490 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लांट संख्या 487, 486 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती हैं , प्लाट संख्या 456, 457 की उत्तरी और पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ- साथ जाती है ,प्लाट संख्या-483 की पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या -482, 465, 466 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, मौजा डुमरिया संख्या-1 और कोटा खकहरा संख्या -2 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ जाती है और ए-22 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए22-423

ए16-17- ए18 रेखा मौजा डुमरिया संख्ता के प्लाट संख्या-1227 के दक्षिणी और पूर्वी रेखा के साथ कामी है , लाक अंत 1227 के दक्षिनी और परिश्रमी देख के साथ जती है और ए-18 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए18-19

रेखा मौजा डुमरिया संख्या-1 के प्लाट संख्या-195, 194, 180, 170, 169 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है, और प्लाट संख्या 135 से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्फ -173 , 127, 128 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है और ए-23 बिन्दु परमिलती है ।

23-24

रेखा मौका- डुमरिणा संचया और प्रकृ জ সওবা -4 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ जाती है और मौजा हाड़कट्ट्टय संख्या-4 के लाट संख्या-303 , 305 , 509 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ आती है - $ 10, 511 की पूर्वी और दक्षिणी रेत के साथ जाती है और ए-19 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए19-५३०' रेखा मौका संख्या-4 के पात्र संख्या-512 , 514, 530, 527, 536, 524, 495 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है और प्लाए संपना 354 , 353 होकर जाती है और ए -20 सिन्धु घर मिलती है ।

20-21

रेखा मौणा- प्लाट संख्या-128, 129 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या-1232 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या-116, 64से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 64 की उत्तरी और पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है , प्लाट संख्पा-61 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है , प्लाट संख्या 59 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है और मौजा डुमरिया संख्या-1 और रक्सांकिटा संख्या 714 को संयुक्त सीमारेखा के साथ जाती है , मौजा रक्साकिटा संख्या-714 की प्लाट संख्या-240 से होकर जाती हैं, प्लाट संख्या- 199की उत्तरी और पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है , प्लाट संख्या-201 से होकर जाती है , प्लाट संख्या-238 के उत्तरी पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या-236 , 235 , 234 , 231 , 230 , 229 कीदक्षिणी रेखा के साथ जाती है और ए-24 बिन्दु परमिलती है ।

ए24-ए1 रेखा मौजा- रक्साकिटा संख्या -714 को प्लाट संख्या-163 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है और मौजा- रक्साकिटा संख्या -714 और रवियाडीह संख्या-713 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा से होकर जाती है, मौजा- रषियाडीह संख्या 713 में प्लाट संख्या-184 की पूर्वी रेखा से होकर जाती है और आरम्भिक बिन्दु ए-1 पर मिलती है ।

[सं. 43015/05/2003 - पी. आर. आई.डब्ल्यू. ] देखा मौका हमरिया संचया 1 के प्रशाद संचना-1040 , 1947 से लेकर आती है पूर्ण प्लान मंच -1039 , 1038, 1037, 1033 की कचरी रेखा के नाम आती है, प्लाड संख्या-1032 जी पूर्वी रेत से होकर आती है, प्लার संख्या 1956 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेत के साथ फाती है, प्रणाह संख्या 1018 तीरेखा से होकर जाती है, नाद संख्या 1016 , 1015, 1014, 996 से होकर जाती है और मात्र संकमा 997 की पूर्वी रेखा से होकर जाती है । साह संचया 1006 की पूर्वी और वारी रेखा से होकर जाती है । प्लाद संख्या 1005 , 1003, 1002, 1001 , 1000, 999 की उत्तरी रेखाके जाम जाती है , प्लाइ जंक 732 से होकर जाती है, प्यार संचना- की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाक संचया 88 87 878 की उत्तरी रेखा से होकर जाती है , लाड संख्या-611 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा से प्रोफार जाती है और प्लाट संख्या -610 से होकर जाती है, लाड संख्या-395 से होकर जाती है और 21 विन्दु पर मिलती है ।

संजय बहादुर, निदेशक [PART I-SEC. 3 (ii )] 646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004 /MAGHA 25, 1925

New Delhi , the 5th February, 2004

may within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land.

Explanation-It shall not be an objection within

the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of the coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other persons

S.O. 344. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 2331 dated the 7th August , 2003 issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Area (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957, (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in the Gazette of India, in Part II , Section 3 , Sub - section ( ii ) dated the 16th August , 2003 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for Coal in 256.04 hectares ( approximately ) of lands in the locality specified in the schedule annexed to that notification .

And, whereas the Central Government is satisfied thatcoal is obtainable from the said lands;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the lands measuring 256.04 hectares (approximately) and all rights as described in the schedule annexed hereto:

ל (2) Every objectioff under Sub -section ( 1 ) shall be maddto the competent authority in writing and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity ofbeing heard either in person or by a legalpractitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further enquiry , if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report inrespectof the land which has been notified under Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over suchland.or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land to the Central Government , containing his recommendations on the objections together withthe record of the proceedings held by him, for the decisions ofthat Government.

Note 1 : The plan bearing number ECL /HURRA/ MOUZA/05 Dated 28-09-2003 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the Office of the Dy. Commissioner, District , Godda (Jharkhand ) ) , or in the Office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 . or in the Office of the Director Technical (Operation ) , Eastern Coalfields Limited, Sanctoria, Post Office Dishergarh, Dist . Burdwan ( West Bengal ) . Pin Code Number - 713333 .

(3). For the purpose of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act. "

Note 2: Attention is hereby invitedto the provisions of Section 8 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) , which provides as follows:-

"8 Objections as acquisition :

Note- 3 : The Coal Controller 1, Council House Street, Kolkata - 700001 has been appointed by the Central Govt. as the competent authority under the Act .

( 1). Any person interested in any land in respect of which notification under Section 7 has been issued

SCHEDULE

HURRAH ' C' PROJECT OF RAIMAHAL AREA

Remarks

District

Sl . Mouza /Village

Area (InHector)

Police Station

Thana No.

No.

Part

8.27

Godda

713

Mahagama

1 Rabiadih

Part

14.91

Godda

714

Mahagama

2 Rakshakitta

Part

165,67

Godda

BW- Simra - II

3 Dumaria

Part

6.32

Godda

BW-Simra - II

4 Harkatta

Part

60.87

Godda

BW- Simra - II

5 Pachrukhi

Total : 256.04 (Hector) 649 ... भारत का राजपत्र फरवरी 14, 2004/माष 25, 1925

[ भाग II-खष्क 3 (ii ) ]

117

LAND SCHEDULE

HURRAH ' C' PROJECT, RAJMAHAL COALFIELDS

PLOT NOS. (AS GIVEN BELOW) TO BE ACQUIRED IN MOUZA-RABIADIH NO. 713

519,520,521,522,523, 524 525,526,527 528 529, 530, 531 , 532,533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541 , 542, 543 , 543/1238, 544, 545, 546, 547 , 548, 549,550 , 551, 552,553, 554,555,556,557, 558, 559, 560, 564, 562, 563, 564, 565,566 , 567, 568, 569, 570, 571,572 , 573 , 574, 575 , 576, 577, 578, 579,580, 581 , 582, 583,584,585, 586,587, 588,589, 590, 591 , 592, 593, 594,595 (P) , 595/1294, 732 (P) , 879 , 880, 880/1239, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203 , 204, 205, 206 , 207, 208 , 209, 210 , 211 , 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231 , 232, 233 , 234, 235.

PLOT NOS. (AS GIVEN BELOW) TO BE ACQUIRED IN MOUZA-RAKSAKITTA NO. 714

164, 165 , 166 , 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180 , 181 , 182, 183, 184, 185 , 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 200, 201 , 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211 , 212, 213 , 214, 215, 216, 217, 218 , 219, 220, 221 , 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231 , 232, 233, 234, 235 , 236, 237, 240(P).

PLOT NOS, (AS GIVEN BELOW) TO BE ACQUIRED IN MOUZA DUMARIANO. 1

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 45/1228, 46, 47,48, 49, 50, 51 , 52, 53 , 54, 54/1229, 55,56, 57, 58, 64(P), 65, 66,67 , 68, 69, 70, 71 , 72, 73,74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83,84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 , 92, 93 , 94, 95, 96,97,98 , 99,

100, 101 , 102, 103, 104,105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111 , 112,

113, 114, 115, 116(P) , 116/1230, 116/1231 , 117, 118, 119,

881,882, 883,884, 885,886, 890, 891,892, 893 , 894, 895 , 896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 902, 903 , 904 , 905, 906, 907 , 908, 909, 910 , 911, 912,913 , 914, 915 , 916 , 917 , 918 , 919 , 920, 921,922, 923, 924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931 , 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939 , 940, 996(P), 1007 , 1008,1009, 1010, 1011 , 1012, 1014(P) , 1015 (P) , 1016 (P), 1017(P), 1040(P), 1041 (P), 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051 , 1052, 1053 , 1054, 1055, 1057, 1058 , 1059, 1060, 1061, 1062, 1063 , 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067, 1068, 1069, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1073 , 1074, 1075, 1076, 1077, 1078, 1079, 1080, 1081 , 1082, 1083 , 1084, 1085 , 1086, 1087, 1088, 1089, 1090, 1091 , 1092, 1093 , 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097 , 1098, 1099, 1100, 1101 , 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111 , 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121 , 1122, 1123 , 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128, 1129, 1130 , 1131, 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135, 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141 , 1142, 1143 , 1144, 1145, 1146, 1146/1240, 1147, 1148, 1149 , 1150 , 1151 , 1152 , 1153 , 1154 , 1155,1156,1157, 1158 , 1159, 1160, 1161, 1162, 1163, 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167, 1168 , 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173, 1174, 1175, 1176, 1177 , 1178(P), 1179, 1180, 1181 , 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1186, 1187, 1188, 1189, 1191 , 1192, 1193, 1194,1195, 1196, 1197, 1198 , 1199 , 1200, 1201 , 1202 , 1203 , 1204, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208 , 1209, 1210, 1211, 1213, 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217 , 1218, 1219, 1220 1221 , 1222, 1223, 1224, 1225 , 1226 .

120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125, 126 , 127, 135 (P) , 171 , 172 ,

174,175,176,177,178,179 , 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203,

204,205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211 , 212, 213, 214, 215, 216,

PLOT NOS. (AS GIVEN BELOW) TO BE ACQUIRED IN MOUZA - HARKATTA NO. 4 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229,

230, 231 , 232, 233 , 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 , 242,

243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251 , 252, 253, 254, 255,

354(2),496,497,498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506,507, 508 , 509, 510, 511, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521 , 522,523 ,

256,257,258, 259, 260, 261 , 262,263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268,

269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281 ,

282,283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291 , 292, 293, 294,

PLOT NOS (AS GIVEN BELOW) TO BE ACQUIRED IN MOUZA PACHRUKHINO. 14 295, 296,297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305 , 306, 307,

308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320,

321,322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333,

334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346,

347,348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357,358,359,

360,361, 362, 363, 364, 365 , 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371,372,

373,374,375,376,377, 378, 379, 380, 381,382, 383, 384, 385,

386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397,398,

399,400,401,402,403 , 404, 405, 406, 407,408, 409,410,411,

412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421 , 421/1235 ,

422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 429/ 1236,430,431,

432,433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440,441 , 442,443,444,

445,446,447, 448, 449,450,451, 452, 453,454,455,458,459,

460,461, 462, 463,464, 481 (P), 482(P),489(P), 492, 493, 494,

495,496,497, 498, 499, 500,501 , 502, 503, 504, 505 , 506,

1,2,3,4,5,6, 7, 8 , 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37,38, 39,40, 41, 41/342,42,43,44,45, 46,47, 48,49, 50, 51,52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 , 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68,69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 , 78, 79, 80, 81 , 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 , 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 , 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112 , 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125, 126, 128, 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133,134, 135 , 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171 , 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201 , 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212 , 213 , 214, 215, 216, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511 , 512, 513 , 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/ MAGHA 25, 1925

A10-A11

A11 -A12

217, 218 , 219 , 220, 221 , 222, 223 , 224, 225 , 226, 227 , 228, 229 , 230, 231 , 232 , 233 , 234, 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239, 240, 241 , 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 , 247, 248 , 250, 251 , 252 , 253 , 254, 255 , 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264, 265 , 266, 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 283 , 284, 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 292, 293 , 294, 295, 296 , 297, 299 , 300 , 301, 303, 304, 305 , 307 , 308, 309, 310, 311 , 312 , 313 , 314, 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 343,

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION :

A12-A13

A1 -A2

A13 -A14

Line starts from western and southern point ofplot No. 194 and passes along with southern line of plot No. 195 of Mouza- Rabiadih No. 713 and meets point A-2 as delineated on plan .

A2-A3

A14-A15

Line passes throughjoint boundary line of Mouza- Tetaria No. 31 RabiadihNo. 713 and meets at point A- 3 of trio -boundary line of Mouza -Tetaria No. 31 , Rabiadih No. 713. and Dumaria No. 1 as delineated on plan.

A3-A4

A15 -A16

Line passes throughjoint boundary line of Mouza -Tetaria No. 31 and Durnaria No. 1 and meets at Point A-4 of trio -boundary line of Mouza -Tetaria No. 31 , Dumaria No. 1 and Paharpur No. 32 as delineated onplan.

A4-A5

[PART II-SEC.3 (ii) ] Line passes along with western and south- ern line ofplotNo. 326 ofMouza -Pachrukhi No. 14 andmeets at Point at A - 1 1 as delin- eated on the plan.

Line passes along with northern line ofplot No. 282. of Mouza -Pachrukhi No. 14 and meets at Point atA- 12 as delineated on the plan.

Line passes along with eastern, northern andwestern line of plot No. 282 of Mouza- Pachrukhi No. 14 and mests at point at A-13 as delineated on the plan.

Line passes along with northern , western and southern line of plot No. 282 of Mouza-Pachrakhi No. 14 meets at point at A-14 as delineated on theplan.

Line passes along with the joint boundary line of Mouza -Pachrukhi No. 14 and Dewmaria No. 1 and meets at point at A- 15 as delineated on theplan.

Line passes through Plot No. 1178 of Mouza -Dumaria No. 1 , passes along with western and southern line of plot No. 1178, passes through Plot No. 732 passes along with western line ofPlot No. 1227 ofMouza- Dumaria No. 1 and meets at Point at A- 16 as delineated on the plan.

A16-A17-A18

Line passes along with joint boundary line ofMouza -Paharpur No. 32 and Dumaria No. 1 and meets at Point A- 5 of Trio-bound- ary line of Mouza- Paharpur , Dumaria & Pachrukhi as delineated on plan.

A5-A6

Line passes along withjoint boundary line ofMouza - Paharpur No.32 and Patchrukhi No. 14 and meets at point A- 6 as delin- eated on the plan.

A6-A7 -A8 Line passes along with western southern and eastern line of Mouza - Pachrukhi No. 14 plot No. 127, 141 , 249 and passes along with joint boundary line of Mouza- Pachrukhi No. 14 and Paharpur No. 32 and passes along with western line of Plot No. 298 of Mouza -Pachrukhi and meets at PointA- 8 as delineated on the plan.

A8 -A9 -A10 Line passes along with eastern line ofplot No. 298 of Mouza - Pachrukhi No. 14 and passes along with southern northern and western line of plot No. 302 of Mouza- Pachrukhi No. 14 line passes along with western, southern and eastern line ofplot No. 306 passes along with joint boundary ofMouza -Pachrukhi No. 14 and Paharpur No. 32 and meets at point A- 10 as delin- eated on the plan.

Line passes along with southern and east- ern line ofplot No. 1227 of Mouza -Dumaria No. 1 passes along with the southern and western line of plot No. 1227 and meetsat point A- 18 as delineated on the plan.

A18-A19 Line passes along with the joint boundary line ofMouza - Dumaria No. 1 and Mouza- Harkatta No. 4 passes along with eastern line of Plot No. 503 , 505 , 509 of Mouza - Harkatta No. 4 passes along with eastern and southern line ofplot No. 510 , 511 and meets at point at A- 19 as delineated on the plan.

A19-A20 Line passes along with northern line ofplot No. 512, 514, 530, 527 , 526, 524 , 495 of Mouza -Harkatta No. 4 and passes through Plot No. 354, 353 and meets at point A-20 as delineated on the plan.

A20-A21 Line passes through Plot No. 1040, 1041 of Mouza-Dumaria No. 1, passes along with northern line ofplot No. 1039, 1038, 1037, 1033 passes through eastern line of Plot No. 1032, passes along with eastern and northern line of Plot No. 1056 , passes [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माम 25, 1925

649

No.713, passes through eastern line ofPlot No. 184 of Motizá - Rabiadih No. 713 and meets at starting point at A - l as delineated ontheplan.

[No. 43015/05/2003-PRIW] SANJAY BAHADUR, Director

श्रम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2003 : through northern line of plot No. 1018, passes through Plot No. 1016, 1015 , 1014, 996, passes through eastern line ofPlot No. 997, passes through eastern andnorth- era line ofPlot No. 1006, passes along with northern line ofPlot No. 1005, 1003 , 1002, 1001, 1000, 999 , passes throughPlot No. 732, passes along with eastern and northern line of plot No. 889, passes through northern line of Plot No. 888, 887, 878 , passes through eastern and northern line of plot No. 611 , passes through plot No. 610 , passes through plot No. 595 and meets at point at A-21 as delineated ontheplan.

A21 -A22

का. आ. 345. राष्ट्रपति, श्री हैदर अली हजारिका को 28-11-2003 ( पूर्वाहन ) से केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण- सह- श्रम न्यायालय , गुवाहाटी के पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करते हैं । श्री हैदर अली हजारिका तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों के जारी होने तक केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण- सह- श्रम न्यायालय , गुवाहाटी के पीठासीन अधिकारी के पद पर बने रहेंगे ।

[सं. ए-11016/4/2003- सी एल एस-11 ] वाई. पी. सहगल, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi, the 15th December , 2003 Line passes along with eastern line ofplot No. 601 , 600 of Mouza -Dumaria No. 1, passes through southern line of Plot No. 597, 596 , passes through plot No. 481 , 482 , 489 , passes along with eastern line ofplot No. 491 , passes along with eastern and northern line of plot No. 490, passes along with northern line of plot No. 487, 486, passes along with northern and western line of plot No. 456 , 457 , passes along with western line of Plot No. 483 , passes along with northern line of plot No. 482, 465, 466, passes along with joint boundary line of Mouza-Dumaria No. 1 and Chota -Khadhara No. 2 and meets at point at A - 22 as delineated on the plan .

S.O 345. The President is pleased to appoint Shri Haidor Ali Hazarika as Presiding Officer Central Govt. Industrial -Tribunal -Cum -Labour Court , Guwahati w.e.f. 28-11-2003 (F.N. ) Shri Haidor Ali Hazarika will continue to hold the post ofPresiding Officer of the CGIT -cum -Labour Court , Guwahati for a period of three years or until further orders.

A22-A23

[No. A- 11016/4/2003 -CLS - II ) Y. P. SEHGAL , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 16 जनवरी , 2004

Line passes along with eastern line of 195 , 194 , 180 , 17t) , 169 of Mouza -Dumaria No. 1, passes through Plot No. 135 , passes along with castern line ofplot No. 173 , 127, 128 and meets at point at A- 23 as deli- neated on the plan .

123 -A24

का. आ. 346.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण , पटना के पंचाट [संदर्भ संख्या 10 ( सी)/2003 ] को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 12011/192/2001 - आई.आर. ( बी. 11 ) अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th January, 21X04 Line passes along with northern line ofPlot No. 128 , 129, passes along with castern and northern line of plot No. 1232 , passes through plot No. 116, 64 , passes along with northern and western line of plot No. 64, passes along with northern line of plot No. 61 , passes along with castern and north- ern line of plot No. 59, passes along with joint boundary line of Mouza ] Dumaria No. 1 and Raksakitta No. 714 , passes through Plot No: 240 of Mouza Raksakitta No. 714, passes along with northern and western line ofplot No. 199, passes through plot No. 201 , passes along with northern and western line of plot No. 238 , passes through southern line of Plot No. 236, 235, 234, 231 , 230, 229 and meets at point atA- 24 as delincated on the plan ..

A24-A1

S.O. 346. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 10/ (C)/2003 ] of the Industrial Tribunal , Patna (Bihar ) as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen received by the Central Government on 16-1-2004.

Line passes along with castern linc of plot No. 163 ofMouza Raksakitta No. 714 and passes through joint boundary line of Mouza-Raksakitta No. 714 and Rabiadih

No. L- 12011 / 192/2001-4R ( B- 11 ) | AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

٢٠

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA

Reference Case No. 10C of 2003

3. The learned Secretary of the Workers ' Union further submitted that the worker's widow has espoused a separate and individual dispute in the matter with reliefs aforesaid as enumerated in written statement and the same has been referred by the Govt . to this Tribunal for adjudication. Hef referenice has been registered here as Ref. 320 of2003 , a pérusal of which makes it clear that her- claim is quite identical and stie has sought compassionate appointment upon the death of her husband.

Management of UCO Bank, Mauryalok Complex , Patna and their workman represented by UCO Bank Employees Association , Exhibition Road, Patna .

: Mr. P. K. Chatterjee , A.C.O.

For the Management

For the Workman : Sri B. Prasad , State Secretaryу, UCO Bank Employees Association .

4. Facts aforesaid do very well suggest that on the date of reference ofthe present dispute the related worker Sri Babloo was no more iti this world and'accordingly, the Govt. should not made a legal réference in the matter . The reference thusbecomes beyond jurisdiction and demands no answer. The feference is disposed of in above terms .

PRESENT

5. Award accordingly.

: Priya Saran, Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal , Patna .

AWARD

٢٠٣ PRIYA SARAN , Presiding Officer

Dictated and Corrected by me .

The 6th January, 2004

नई दिल्ली, 16 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 347. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 20( सी )/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The adjudication Order No. L- 12011/ 192/2001 - IR(B - 11 ) dated 22-04-2002 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour . New Delhi has referred, under Clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( hereinafter to be referred to as ' the Act ' ) , the following dispute between the management of UCO Bank , Mauryalok Complex, Patna and their workman Sri Babloo, Peonfor adjudication to this Tribunal: ---

[सं. एल.-12012/417 /95 - आई. आर. ( बी. 11 ) अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th January, 2004 "Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank, Karkarbagh Branch, Patna in not regularising Shri Babloo , Pcon is justified ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to? "

S.O. 347. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 10/ (C)/2003 ) of the Industrial Tribunal , Patna as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Punjab National Bank atid their workman which was received by the Central Government on 16-1-2004.

No. L- 12012/417/95 -IR ( B - II ) } AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , PATNA

Reference Case No. 20C of2003

Management of Punjab National Bank, Zonal Office. R-Block , Chankaya Palace, Patna and their workman represented by General Secretary ; Punjab National Bank Staff Union , H.O. PNB , Zonal Office , Patna .

2. The management in its application filed today has prayed for passing a no dispute award or any other befitting order , as the workman Sri Babloo had died on 6-11-2001 before the dispute was referred to this Tribunal , meaning thereby that no dispute between the workman and the management of UCO Bank was there in existence at the time of reference . The State Secretary of the UCO Bank Employees Association , Patna is present before me with written statement and he also agrees as regards the death of the worker before the reference was made . In the written statement it has been prayed to declare that the worker since dead, was a daily rated worker and further his widow Smt . Kiran Devi be declared and appointed as a Peon on compassionate ground in her husband's place. Above prayer regarding declaration of worker's widowas his substitute and her consequent appointment on compassionate ground would be beyond the purview and scope of this reference which was made by the Govt . simply to adjudicate whether the action of the management of UCO Bank , Kankarbagh Branch, Patna in not regularising Sri Babloo , Peon was justified and if notto what relief he was entitled .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/ 间 26, 1925

651 None:

For theManagement :

FortheWorkman

None .

टी/एससी/आर/ 224/98 ) वने प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को19-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

PRESENT

: PriyaSaran, Presiding Offloor, Industrial Tribunal , Patna.

[सं. एल.-42012/147/98- आईआरसीयू) कुलदीप राय वर्मा, 'वैस्क अधिकारी AWARD

New Delhi , the 19th January, 2004 The 6th January, 2004

S.O. 340. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14' of 1947), the Central " Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 224 / 98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 19-1-2004

By adjudication Order No. L - 12012/417 /95 - IR(B - 11) dated 31-11-96 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi has referred, under Clause ( d) of sub- section (1 ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter to be referred to as ' the Act ' ) , the following dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank, Zonal Office , Patna and their workman Sri S.K. Sinha , Cashier - in -Charge for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

[No. L -42012/ 147/98 - IR (DU)] KULDIP RAI ,VERMA, Desk Officer...

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR.COURT JABALPUR

"Whether , the action of the management of Punjab. National Bank, Patna in denying special leave atid other consequential benefits of Sh . S.K. Sinha , Cashier - in- Charge of Nadwan Branch arising out of the injury sustained during the course of: employment of the bank isjustified and legal? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to?

CaseNo. CGIT/LC/R/224/98.02

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI SHRIKANT SHUKLA

Applicant

Shri Bheem Sen S/o Shri Budharam R/oVillageNanda KaNala, Thana Malhapura Urf, Dhanouli , Distt . Agra (UP)

Verlus

TheAssistant Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sarıgathan , Regional Office, Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 3,211 Morar Cantt. Gwalior

Shri S.C. Jain,

2. It reveals from the record that the parties appeared on notice but did not prefer filing their written statement inspite of several adjournments in this behalf. The management of Punjab National Bank, however, filed an application on 30-12-2003 praying therein to pass a 'No Dispute Award' in view ofpetition filed by worker Sri S.K. Sinha intending to withdraw the dispute on account of his disinterestedness in the matter . The photocopy of the petition to this effect in worker's signature stands annexed with the application . The documents do suggest that the worker since promoted as Officer J.M.G. - Scale - 1 in the Bank does not continue to be in dispute with the Bank's management and so has expressed his desire to withdraw the same . In view of aforesaid changed circumstarices and further no material of evidence forthcoming to draw some other conclusior I am left with no other option but to pass a 'No Dispute Award' .

Non -applicants

Assistant Commissioner , Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan , Regional Office , Gwalior.

3. In view of above , a no dispute Award is passed. accordingly.

AWARD

Dictated& Corrected by me

Passed on this 9th day of January, 2004 PRIYA SARAN, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी, 2004

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L-42012/147 /98HR (DU) dated 7-10-88 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

का. आ. 348. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सस्कार केन्द्रीय विद्यालय संगठन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों केपबीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार अधिनिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट' ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई

whether the action of the management of Assistant Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan in terminating the services of Shri Bhim Sain S/p Shri Budha Ramis legallegal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? " 357GI/04-11 652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MМАСНА 25, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 2. The case of the workman in brief is that his name was called for from employment exchange, Morena and after selection by the Selection Committee, he was appointed on the post of peon , which is " D " class post on 7-1-1997 in the pay scale of Rs . 750-940 alongwith other benefits of DA etc. The appointment was for the probation of 2 years and on successful completion of probation period, the applicant was to be confirmed. The worker was working satisfactorily but the Commissioner of respondent gave an order of transfer on 13-2-97 to the then Principal K. V. Morena Shri J.R. Malviya on a lower post ofvice Principal . He challenged the orders by a Writ Petition No. 376/97 on 26-2-97 which is still pending. However the Honourable High Court issued an ad- interim Writ on 14-3-97 . As soon as the Assistant Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya came to know about stay order, he issued the termination order of the worker vice order dated 17-3-97 with a cheque of Rs . 2328/- equal to one month wages . The worker filed the writ petition in Honourable High Court of MP Bench Gwalior but lateron it was withdrawn with the liberty to approach the authority under I.D. Act . The worker's case is that he worked on the post of peon from 10-1-97 till 17-3-97 . Shri S. C. Jain Assistant Commissioner issued the order out of vengence , because the applicant was appointed by Kum. J. R. Malviya. The worker has also stated in the statement of claim that the post is still existing as he has prayed that termination be declared illegal and direction may be given to the management for reinstating him with back wages and other benefits.

3. The worker has filed photocopy of termination order dated 17-3-97 and photostat copy of the letter of Kendriya Vidyalaya dated 30th December. The worker has also filed the offer of appointment dated 9-1-97.

5.As soon as the above appointment made by the Principal came to the notice of opposite party i.e. Assistant Commissioner, K. V. Sangathan, it was examined as to whether appointment in question hasbeen made as per the prescribed procedure by the Principal , Kendriya Vidyalaya, Morena. Since the appointment of the applicant was not made after following the above procedure, the services ofthe applicant were terminated by the Assistant Commissioner in terms of his appointment and after giving him one months salary in lieu ofonemonth notice . Aggrieved by the above decision oftheAssistant Commissioner, the worker filed petition No. 798/97 before the Honourable High CourtGwalior Bench but the same was withdrawn by the applicant . The worker along with co- appointee Manoj Kumar filed an application before the Assistant Labour Commissioner at Bhopal vide his application dated 9-3-98 wherein the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Bhopal passed an order that the services ofthe workman was terminated during theprobation period as per the clause 4 & 5 of the offer of appointment and he was paid notice salary as provided in the terms ofappointment and gave cheque No. 93250907 for Rs . 2328/-. Hence the dispute is not maintainable . Consequent upon the closure of Kendriya Vidyalaya SangathanRegional Office Gwalior, the Kendriya Vidyalaya Morenahas been brought under the administrative control of the Assistant Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan , Regional Office, Bhopal w.e.f. 18-1-2000. It is also stated that the worker joined the post w.e.f. 10-1-97. The KV Sangathan being an autonomous body under the Ministry ofHRD, Govt . of India and registered society under the Societies Act, XXI of 1860 has been brought under the jurisdiction of the Honourable Central Administrative Tribunal w.e.f. 1-1-99 vide Government of India, Ministry of Personnel , Public Grievances and Pension , Department of Personnel and Training ( At Division ) No. H- 11017/94 (Vil . III) dated 30-12-98 and Gazette Notification dated 17-12-98 . Therefore , the applicant has not filed the application before the appropriate court .

The opposite party has filed the written stare neat , the opposite party has stated that the apporntaient of the workman was without following the prescribed procedure . For appointment of a Group " D" employee in Kendriya Vidyalayas , the following procedure are laid down:-

6. Accordingly the opposite party has requested that the claim is not maintainable and the claim of the worker be dismissed with cost .

1. Issue of NOC regarding appointnient of Group Iemployee against the vacant post by the Asstt. Commissioner , Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan of the concerned Regional Office .

7. It is noteworthy that the worker has not filed rejoinder in respect ofWS.

8. The worker has not turned up on the date of evidence and therefore , recorded the evidence of the witness produced by opposite party Shri N.R. Murli .

2. Requisitionto the Employment Exchange giving requisite information i.c. post carmarked for SC/ST/OBC orUR , Educational Qualification , age etc.

9:Heard argument of the opposite party alone.

3. Conduct of interview by the duly constituted Vidyalaya Appointment Committee , of the candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange .

10. Shri N.R. Murli the officer of the opposite party has proved the contents of written statement by his oral evidence on oath.

11. The opposite party has proved on that the appointment was not made according to the procedure as 4. The approval of the sclection of the VAC by the Assistant Commissioner , KVS Regional Office , before issuing the offer of appointment to the candidate .

[ भाग -खष्ठ 3 (ii) ]

653

भारत का राजपत्र फरवरी 14 , 2004/ माम 25, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी , 2004 laid down. It is admitted fact that the worker himselfwas appointed vide appointment offer datod 7-1-97 for the probation of 2years and acoording to offer ofappointment filedby the worker himself, it is clearly mentioned in para 4& 5 as under:-

का. भा. 349.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्डर कैट्री के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अभिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एल सी/ मार/24/03) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"4. The candidate will be on the probation for a period of 2 years which may be extended further on successful completion of probation , she/ he will be confirmed on the basis of availability of permanent vacancies.

[सं. एल.- 14011 / 10/2002- आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राव वर्मा, डैस्कअधिकारी

New Delhi , the 19th January, 2004 5. During probation and thereaftor until he/she is confirmed, the services of the appointoo are torminableby onemonth's notice on either side without any reason being assigned, therefore , the appointing authority. However reserves the right to terminate the sorviocs of the appointec before the expiry of the stipulatod period of noticeby making payment of a sum equivalent to the pay and allowances for the period of notice or the unexpired portion thereaf. "

S.O. 349. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.CGIT/ LC/R/24/03 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrialdispute between the employers in relation tothe management of Ordnance Factory and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 19-1-2004.

[No. L- 14011/10/2002- IR(DU)] KULDIPRAI VERMA, Desk Officer ANNENUME

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT/LC/R/24/2003

PresidingOfficer: Shri Shrikant Shukla

DATED18/1/2004

TheGoneral Secretary,

Ordnance Factory Karamchari Union (INTUC), Ordnance Factory,

Katni

....Applicant

Versus

TheGeneral Manager, Ordnance Factory, Katni

Non-applicants

AWARD

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L- 14011 / 10/ 2002/IRDU dated 30/ 12/2002- 7-1-2003has referred the following dispute to the Presiding Officer, Central Government Indistrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur:-

12.According to the procedure laid down approval ofthe selection committee was nocossary by the Assistant Commissioner, KVC Regional Office before issuing the aforesaid of appointment to the candidate. The worker has not proved that appointment was made after due approval of the Assistant Commissioner. The witnesshas proved that as soon as the Assistant Commissioner got the information about the appointment of the worker Bhimsen , the same was scrutinises and since Bhimsen was not appointed according to the prescribed procedure therefore the Assistant Commissioner terminated the services by observing the norms, i.c. the payment of one month wages in lieu ofnotice . There is also no stagma in terminating the service ofthe workman. The oppositeparty has the authority to torminate the service without assigning any reason therefor . The opposite party has also paid wages for one month as provided in the offer of appointment and therefore no illegality is committed in terminating his services therefore issue referred to this tribunal is decided in affirmative against the workman . It is also made out from the evidence that the appropriate forum for the workman to redress his grievance was with Contral Administrative Tribunal and not the CGIT -cum- Labour Court. It is also mentioned here that in the offer of appointment itself, it is clearly provided in para 7 that in case of any dispute of claim in respect of services or any contract arising out of or falling out of this appointment , the court at Delhi alone shall be the jurisdiction. In the circumstances , the claim of the worker Bhimsen fails and he is not entitled to any benefits .

13. The copy of the award be sent to the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules.

"Whether the action of the management of Ordnance Factory, Katni in not appointing Shri Mewalal , S /o . Late Shri Dokodi T. No. 53/ Toolroom/P.No. 0660 on compassionate ground isjustified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

Versus

The Regional Director ,

Atomic Mineral Division ,

Western Region ,

Non -applicant

Nagpur.

AWARD

Passed on this 8th day of January - 2004 2. The notice was served on the worker as well as the General Secretary, Ordnance Factory Karamchari Union, Ordnance Factory, Katni but the Union has not filed any statement of claim nor the management has filed any written statement in respect ofthe issue referred. The worker on 5/1/2004 moved the application that this case may be treated as closed . Today the worker has again filed the application paper no . 27 stating that the Union has been able to get the orders of the CAT, Jabalpur on the facts of the case and therefore the Union wants to withdraw the case.

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L - 11 (2)/86-Con.II/DIII (B) /D - II (A) dated 27-11-87 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal

3. Since the statement of claim and the written statement in respect of the issue has not been filed by the parties, therefore the issue cannot be answered .

4. Copy ofthe award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry ofLabour as per rules .

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी , 2004

"Whether the daily rated workers of Bodal Uranium Mines , of Atomic Mineral Division, CasualWorkers under the OM No. 14( 5 )E( Coord )/ 85 dated 20-9-85 are not eligible for payment of Adhoc bonus or the basis of their actual employment for the year 1984-85 ? If so, towhat reliefthey are entitled to ? " "

का. आ. 350.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बोदल यूरेनियम माईन्सके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एलसी/ आर/ 242/ 87 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को19-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. - 11 (2 )/86- कोन. II/डी.. III (बी)/डी: II/(ए) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्कअधिकारी

New Delhi, the 19th January, 2004

S.O. 350. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governinent hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC /R/ 242 / 87 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bodal Uranium Mines and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 19-1-2004 .

2. The Samyukta Khadan Mazdoor Sangh , which shall here- in-after be called as Sangh ( SKMS ) filled the statement of claim stating therein that the Atomic Mineral divisionhas employed certain number of employees for the purpose ofconducting mining operation for feasibility and extraction of Uranium from Bodal Uranium Mines , in Rajnandgson District ( MP) and the employees of Bodal Uranium are under the perview of the Mines Act and regulations . It is alleged that the empolyees of the said mines are also covered under the Industrial employment (SOS) Act and under this act, standing order have been certified and enforced. An Industrial Dispute was raised by the Sangh demanding for grant of Adhoc bonus granted byGovernment of India for the year 1984-85 and the rates allowed to permanent and regular employees. The Atomic Mineral Mines division (hereinafter called the Management ) allowed and granted adhoc bonus at the rate of23 days emoluments to some employees and Adhoc bonus at the rate of a notional monthly wage of Rs . 150 per month irrespective of actual monthly wages to thedaily rated employees at Bodal Uranium Mines.

[No. L- 11 (2)/86-Con.II/D . III (B)/D . II (A) ] KULDIPRAI VERMIA, Desk Officer

3. As per the standing orders , the workman have been classified as

1: Permanent

ANNEXURE

2. Probationers

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

3. Temporary

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

4.Apprentices

5. Badlies or substitutes

Case No. CGIT/LC/R/242/87

6. Casuals

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI SHRIKANT SHUKLA

The Secretary,

Samyukta Khadan Mazdoor Sangh ,

Bodal Uranium Mines ,

Branch PO Ambagarh Chowki ,

Applicant

Daily rate is a word that denotes method and system of payment of wages and it does not suggest any employment - status / classification under the Standing Orders . Such workman who have completed a period of 3 months are permanent " and therefore daily rated workers Dist. Rajnandgaon (MP) भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/मात्र 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

are not casual workman and therefore they should not have been treated as "Casual Worker " . Daily rated workman have been given wrong status of casual labours by the management . Union is therefore urged that the daily rated workman are eligible for payment of adhoc bonus to be paid at the rate of their actual employment- wage i.e. at the daily rates of wages being paid to them under agreements with the Union . The Sangh has therefore prayed that tribunal be pleased to answer the reference holding the daily rated workers of the mines of the Atomic Mineral division as eligible for payment of Adhoc bonus on the basis of their actual employment for the year 1984- 85 and direct the managment to render relief accordingly.

4. The opposite party has denied the claim and has stated that the Industrial Dispute Act does not apply to the persons to whom the fundamental and supplimentary Rules, Civil Services ( Classifications , Control and Appeal ) Rules, Civil Services (Temporary Services ) Rules , Revised Leave Rules . Civil Services Regulations , Civilians in Defence Services ( Classification, Control and Appeal ) Rules or the Indian Railway Establishment Code or any other rules or regulations that may be notified in this behalf by the appropriate Government in the Official Gazette.

5. The Mining standing orders notified by the Certifying Officer, Jabalpur is applicable to the employees other than those who are governed by FRSRs etc. The managment has allowed the bonus for the year 1984-85to its employees in accordance with the OM No. F. 14 (5 )/E/ Coord./65 dated 20-9-85 issued by the Ministry of Finance , Department of Expenditure granting the payment of adhoc bonus for the year 1984-85 . It is submitted by the managment that Atomic Mineral Division has exploratory mine at Bodal. This mine has been developed as a part of the research and development activitics for this Division for finding out the economic viablity of the uranium orc deposits in Bodal and this Division is not making and commercial exploitation of the atomic minerals . The issue regarding payment of bonus as demanded by the workers representatives was referred to Department of Atomic Energy Secretariat, Bombay and they have held that daily rated workers at Bodał mines would be paid adhoc bonus as per the formula indicated in para 4 ( iv ) of the aboveOM .

Thus it has not been possible for the Division to agree to the demand raised by the Union. It is further pointed out that the question of payment of adhoc bonus wasdiscussed in the conciliation meeting held on 21-5- 1986 and the worker's representative had agreed to accept the payment of bonus in accordance with the formula adopted for casual workers in the Finance Ministry's OM reffered to as above . Thus there is no reason for the Union to raise demand again.

:: Bodal Uranium Mines and exploratory minc set up purely as apart of reseach and development activities of the department for comparing the results obtained from

655 sub surface drilling with an ultimate objective of testing its economic viabliity. As such this Division is not doing any commercial exploitation of the atomic minerals . Once its economic viability is proves, the mine is supposed to be handed over to Uranium Corporation of India Limited for Commercial exploitation . In some cases where the underground workings indicate that the mine/area is not economically viable the mine has to be closed also . Declaration of " Permanency " is only for the purpose of Mine Standing Orders and that the mine workers coverd by these orders cannot be held to be holders of civil posts as no post as such is created and their wages are met from contingency. It may further be submitted that the word "Permanency " has to be interpreted, only in the contest of the Mine Standing Orders and not for the purpose of creating posts which do not exist or for purpose of equating mine workers with regular employees. By its very nature of exploitary activities at Bodal , the Management is perforced to keep the workers on daily rated basis . However keeping in view the fact that they have been working with this Division for quite some time , they have been given wage scales and are not strictly treated as casual workers for the purpose of payment and that they are being periodocally assessed and reclassified to the next higher gråde. The daily rated monthly paid workers employed by Annexure B cannotbe treated at par with the other regular Central Govt . employces . Hence the question of payment of adhoc bonus to the mine workers as applicable to other regular Central Government employces docs not arisc .

: 6. The managment has also filed additional written statement rebatting tlic claim of the Sangh and has asserted that Atomic Mineral division under the department of Atomic energy is not an industry. An award of CGIT, Dhanbad has been referred in the additional written statement wherin it has been held that the Atontic Mineral Division, Department of Atomic energy, Government of India is not an industry and the subject matter referred for adjudication was ontside thejurisdiction of the tribunal . Since the payment ofbones of daily rated workers employed at Bodal has already been settled before the Assistant Labour Commissioner. Raipur between the representative of workers and management and the memorandum of settlement has been signed by the representative ofworkmen on 21-5-86. Therefore according to this settlement the workers Should be paid adhoc bomus on the formula 150 × 23/31 = Rs: 111.30 as laid down in Ministry of Finance OM No. F - 14 ( E) -Coord/ 86daled 7-10-86 and hence when the agreement was with the full concurrence of the workers representative i.e. Party no: 2. it is binding on them and they cannot raise the samedispute again in a different forum and it has been alleged by the management that the claim of the Sangh has no merit.

7. The Management has filed the following documents:-

656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

1. Government of India, Ministry of Labour Letter No. L -29012/26/87 - DJ (B ) dated 30-3-89 (Paper No.34).

2. Government of India , Ministry of Labour letter No. L -29024/6/89 - IR ( Misc ) dated 26-4-89 (Paper No. 35 ).

3. Government of India, Ministry of Labour Notification dated 29-3-89 (paper No. 36).

4. Photocopy of award of CGITNo.2 , Dhanbad : employers in relation to the management of Atomic Minerals Division of Deptt. of Atomic energy and their workmen dated 13-3-89 (Paper No. 37) .

41&42). 5. Copy of settlement dated 24-5-86 (Paper No. 6. Government of India , Department of Atomic energy OM No. F- 14 (3) -E ( Coord )/86 dated 7-10-86 (Paper No.43) .

8. The workman has replied to the Additional WS filed by the management and has stated that the judgement givenin the case No. R/ 304/ 87 in the CGIT, Dhanbad is not correct judgement and about the settlement , the Sangh has alleged that-that is not correct .

9. The worker has filed the affidavit of Shri Maharam Shah and the judgement has filed the affidavit ofMurari Trivedi with the Annexures (Exhibit 1 to 5) .

10. The witnesses who have filed the affidavit have been cross exmined by the other party.

11. The workers have not come forward from argument where as the employer has filed the written argument

12. In the circumstances , perused written arguments filed by the management along . The Sangh has not dared to dispute the execution of the settlement, the copy of which have been filed by the management which is Exhibit No. M-4 with the affidavit of Shri Murari Trivedi , Schentific Officer of the managment. Shri Murari Trivedi , Scientific Officer, Central Regional Atomic Division , civil Lines , Nagpur has proved in para 3 of the affidavit that the representative of the workman of Bodal Mine have agreed in the conciliation meeting held on 21-5-81 , where the memorandum of settlement was arrived at and signed between the management and the workers before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C ), Raipur to accept the adhoc bonus of the worker for the year 1984- / 85 with the formula i.e. amount of adhoc bonus Rs . 150 × 23/ 31 = Rs . 111.30 under the provisions of the office nemorandum ofGovernment of India. Ministry of finance , Department of Expenditure order No. F - 14/5- E/Coord/ 85 dated 10-11-83 which was moved by OM No. 14/5 -E/Coord/85 dated 5-12-85 where it was decided for payment ofbonus for 23 days inspite of 18 days . In view of the agreement referred to above , the memorandum of settlement was executed by the Sangh . It is note- worthy that inpara - 18 ,

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] the witness has stated that the said settlement has been countersignedby the ALC ( C) , Raipur and the copy ofthe said settlement is marked as exhibit M - 4 . It is also true that the said settlement has been signed by Shri Nasir Shah, President and shri Sheshnath Singh , Secretary of the Sangh. It is admitted by the witness of the workmen that in the year 1985-86 , the President and Secretaries were the same. In the circumstances, the settlement arrived in between the parties for the binding effect and in view of the settlement arrived at between the partiers , there is no dispute. The Sangh has tried to raise the dispute when the secretary and president were changed. In the circumstances the dispute is not bonafide and it is held that the same Sangh had no right to raise the dispute against the memorandum of settlement which was settled amicably by the parties before conciliation officer.

13. The managment has also strictly argued that the employer i.e. Atomic Mineral division is not an industry andtherefore this court-has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference sent by the Ministry for adjudication.

14. The Scientific Officer has proved that atomic Mineral Division (AMD) is entrusted with the task of conducting survey and prospecting for uranium and other AtomicMinerals required for the Nuclear Power Programme ofthe Deparment of Atomic Energy, Government of India . The AMD sometimes also carried out the task of exploratory mining on a very limited scale to confirm the drilling data and to obtain bulk samples of ere for various scientific studies for generation of data for project planning . The activities of the Atomic Minerals Division arebasically research and Development in nature and do not constitute an Industrial activitiy. These functions are in the exclusive domain of the Govt . of India in terms of Sec-3a of theAtomic Energy Act of 1962. The AMD was conducting exploratory mining at Bodal in Distt. Rajnandgaon, MP and the same was closed w.e.f. 1-7-89 after evaluating the occurrence of uranium mineralisation in terms of the Decision of the Secretary to the Government ofIndia in theDepartment ofAtomic Energy Bombay vide his letter No. 22/54/88/AMD (I & M) 238 dated31-3-89 .

15. The witness of the management have also proved that the Ministry of Labour vide letter No. 30-3-89 have declared that the Atomic Mineral Division of the Department of Atomic Energy is not industry within the meaning of Section 2 (j ) of the I.D. Apt . A copy of the said letter has also been filed by the witness as Exhibit . M-2. The witnesses stated that the Ministry of Labour , Government of India's views have been confirmed by the letter dated 26-4-89 which is marked as Exhibit M -3 . The witnesses have not been cross -examinedby the Sangh on the facts stated above .

16. Although the award passed in reference No. 304/87 in a reference between employees of Atomic Mineral division of Department of Atomic Energy and their workmen dated 13-3-89 by the Central Govt . Industrial 657 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25 , 1925

claim is not maintenable by the CGIT cum Labour Court, Jabalpur.

19. I have discussed earlier that the workman Union (Sangh) and the employer has already arrived on settlement for the payment of daily rated workers and therefore the same Sangh cannot come forward and filed a dispute , as they resolved their dispute amicably by the matual settlement and therefore they are not eligible for payment of adhoc bonus on the basis of their actual employment for the year 1984-85 and secondly the employer is not an industry and therefore merit of the settlement cannotbe challenged in the CGIT, Jabalpur as the CGIT has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter.

20. The award is passed accordingly.

21. The copy of the award be sent to the Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour as per rules.

SHRIKANT SHUKLA , PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 351.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, इण्डियन मेट्रोलोजिकल डिपार्टमेंट प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जयपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी.- 25/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल.-42012/191/2001- आई.आर. ( सी. एम.- II ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्कअधिकारी

New Delhi , the 19th January, 2004 Tribunal -cum- Labour court, No. 2, Dhanbad is not binding upon this tribunal but the reasons given by the Presiding Officer holdingAtomic Mineral division of department of Atomic Energy as non- industry is acceptable to me also. It is true that the work of the department is also confined to the research and do not work in production of atomic materials . The work done by the atomic mineral division is certainly amounts to sovereign function of the Government. The Atomic Mineral division is in the department of Atomic energy. The activities of Atomic Mineral Division are feasible research and developments in nature and do not constitute an industrial activity. These functions are in exclusive domain of the Central Government . Now the Atomic Mineral Division was conducting sub-surface prospecting operations at Bodal (Rajnandgaon) for evaluating the occurrence of uranium mineralisation at these places . This work was completed in June - 1989 and hence it was decided by the department ofAtomic Energy to close down the two exploratory mining operations . Therefore it cannotbe said that AtomicMineral Division is engaged in industry activity. It has been argued on behalf of the employer that the chart ofdutics ofAtomic Mineral department enjoins upon it the responsibilities to survcy, locatc , assess , cvaluate and finally hand over the technically feasible and economically viable deposits of uranium to the Uranium corporation of India Ltd. , a Public Sector Undertaking of the Department of Atomic energy for commercial cxploitation . In the process of evaluation of the deposits , Atomic Minerals Division sometimes also carries out the task of exploratory mining on a very limited scaleto confirm the drilling data and to obtain bulk samples of the ore for various scientific studies for generation of data for project planning . Similarly after exploration and evaluation of deposits of rare minerals and rare carths technically feasible and cconomically viable deposits arc handed over to the Indian Rare Earths Ltd. In the circumstances , I am of the opinion that the employer is not an industry.

S. O. 351. In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. CGIT-25 /2002 ) ofthe Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the man- agement of Indian Meterological Department, and their work- man, receivedby the Central Government on 19-1-2004.

[No. L-42012/ 191/2001 -IR(CM- II) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

CASE NO, CGIT-25/2002

Reference No. L-42012/ 191/ 2001 IR (CM - II ) dated 4-9-2002

17. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide their letter No. L- 29012/26/27- DJM(B) dated 30-3-89 in an industry dispute between the management of Atomic Mineral division in Baghjata project near Mosabani District , Singhbum, Bihar and their workman , Shri S.S. Goswami regarding his employment , stated that the Atomic Minerals Division is not an Industry within the meaning of Section 2 (j ) of I.D. Act , 1947. Similarly the Labour Ministry has written another letter reference No. L-29024/ 6/89 - IR (Misc) dated 26-4-89 that the Atomic Mineral Division of the department of Atomic Energy is not an industry within the meaning of Section 2 (j ) of I.D. Act, 1947.

Sh . Chandra Prakash

S/o Sh. Ram Narayan,

...Applicant

R/o 173 , Shyam Puri, Outside Hida Ki Mori , Jaipur.

Versus

18. From the evidence on record and from the argument forwarded by the employer, I am of the opinion that the employer is not covered in the definition of Industry under the I.D. Act. In the circumstances the statement of 658

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] The Director,

Indian Meteorological Department , Budh Singh Pura , Sanganer ,

Jaipur.

Non - applicant

PRESENT: Presiding Officer , Sh. R.C. SHARMA,

management in favour of the workman and that the workman was temporarily employed for clearting the premises 6 hours per day, but he attended the office only for 2 hours a day and, therefore, he was disengaged w.e.f. 1-12-2000 . It has also been pointed out that the recruitment is being made by the department on following the prescribed rules., : Sh. K.C. Sharma

Forthe Applicant

For the Non- applicants: : Sh. B.L. Takhad

In the rejoinder , the workman has reiterated the facts asalleged in the claim statement ...

Date ofAward

: 14-11-2003

framed On pleadings following points for determination were AWARD

1. Whether the workman was employed by the non- applicant management on 5-3-98 as Cleaner ( Safaiwala ) against the vacant post who performed the perennial work of a regular employee? BOA The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause D of Sub - sections 1 & 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( for short ' The Act ' ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under :-

2. Whether the workman has worked more than 240 days in an year , who was declined to join the duty w.e.f. 1-12-2000 and thus , the non - applicant establishment has violated the provisions under Section 25 -F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 194720 BOA "Whether the action of the management i.e. Director, Meteorological Department, Meteorological Centre , Jaipur in terminating Sh . Chandra Prakash S /o Sri Ram Narayan from services w.e.f. 1-12-2000 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief he is entitled to ?"

3. Whether the non - applicant management has recruited Smt. Munni Devi as Cleaner after the termination of the service of the workman and has thus violated the provisionsunder Section 25-F ofthe Act? BOA

4. Whether the workman is entitled for reinstatement inthe service with consequential benefits?

BOA

5. Whether this industrial dispute is not covered by the Industrial Disputes Act?

BONA

6. Relief, ifany.

The workman has filed his affidavit, who was cross- examined on behalf of the non - applicant. In defence, the affidavit of Shri Shankar Singh, the Director was placed on record, who was cross -examined on behalf of the workman .

Both the parties have placed the documents on the record which will find mention hereinafter.

I have heard both the parties and have gone through the record.

The point wise discussion follows as under :-

The applicant-workman in his statement of claim has pleaded that he was appointed on 5-3-1988 as the attender (Safaiwala ) against the vacant post by the non - applicant management in whose favour a work performance certificate dt . 26-6-1999 (Ex - W - 1 ) was issued by the non- applicant management , that he served the department from 5-3-1998 to 9-2-2000 and that the management had issued the another work performance certificate (Ex- W-2) on 13-11-2000 to this effect . The workman has further averred that although he was employed as part -time employee but he had performed all the works which were discharged by a regular employee. Since the salary of a 4th class employee was not paid to him, he issued a registered notice on 29-11-2000 to the management and thereafter on 1-12-2000 his service was orally terminated. After his termination the Meteorological Deptt. , Delhi issued an advertisement (Ex - W-3 ) calling for the applications for recruitment to the various posts . The workmanhas stated that he had raised an industrial dispute before the conciliation officer , who had subsequently submitted a failure report to the Labour Ministry . Challenging the termination, the workman has pleaded that during the period 5-3-1998 to 9-2-2000 he had completed over 240 days in the calendar year, who was neither served with a valid notice nor he was paid the retrenchment compensation prior to lus termination in violation of Section 25 -F of the Act . It is also stated that after his termination Smt . Munni Devi has been appointed by the management inviolation of Section 25 -H of the Act . The workman has prayed for his reinstatement with back wages .

POINTS No. 1 & 2 : The Id . representative for the workman contends that it is clear from Ex - W - 2 , the work performance certificate , that the workman had worked with the managenient from 5-3-1998 to 9-2-2000 and thus hehad completed over 240 days in each calendar year . On the contrary, the Id. representative for the management submits that the workman was not appointed by the management, but he was assigned the work on contractual basis and the allegation of the workinan: that he was appointed against the vacant post of the attender is not correct in view of the fact that in the year 1998 there was no post of attender in the management.

I have bestowed my thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions .

In return, the non -applicant denying the facts has as alleged by the workman has stated that the present controversy does not fall within the ambit of this Act. , that the workman was never appointed against the vacant post of an attender , but he was assigned the work of cleaning on contractual basis on payment of Rs . 295 monthly wages to him . The non - applicant has admitted that the work performance certificate ( Ex - W - 2) was issued by the

So far as the employment of the workman from 5-3-1998 to 9-2-2000 with the management is concerned, it [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

isundisputed. Admittedly, the certificate Ex- W- 1 was issuedby the management in favour of the workman which states that he is working as part time cleaner since 5-3-1998 with the management. The another work performance certificate Ex - W -2 speaks that the workman had worked from 5-3-1998 to 9-2-2000 as part time Safaiwala with the non - applicant management . Thus , the workman was employed by the management during the period commencing from 5-3-1998 to 9-2-2000.

The real controversy arising between the parties is that the workman has pleaded that he was performing the works which were discharged by the regular employees , whereas the management's stand is that he was a part time employee.

MW- 1 Shankar Singh in his affidavit has stated that the workman was engaged on daily wages for 6 hours a day, but after improving his statement he has deposed that he used to work only for one or one and half hours a day .

This version is in itself a vague one and it cannot be presumed that when a part time employee has been engaged to perform 6 hours a day, he would be permitted to discharge the duties only for one or one and half hours a day. As against it, the workman in his cross - examination has categorically denied the questions put up on behalf ofthe management that he had to work only for 3 hours a day and has pointed that he performed the work for 5 or 6 hours a day . The workman could not be impeached on this point on behalf of the management . Thus , it appears from the oral evidence that the workman was discharging the duties which were similar to that of a regular employee and are perennial in nature.

Now I advert to the next point whether the workman had completed over 240 days during the preceding year to histermination.

Again, admittedly , the workman was disengaged w.e.f 1-12-2000 by an oral order . As has been stated eariier MW- 1 Shankar Singh has admitted in his cross - examination that the work performance certificates Ex- W - 1 & Ex-W - 2 were respectively issued by him to the workman. Thus , prior to the date of termination in the preceding year i.e. in the calendar year of 1999 the workman had compieted over 240 days with the management . Apart it, the factors ofthe issuance of a valid notice to the workman or providing the retrenchment compensation to him could not be agitated onbehalf of the management and it is manifest that these mandates under Section 25 of the Act were not compiied with by the management. Thus , the termination of the service of the workman tentamounts to the retrenchment under section 25 -F of the Act . Accordingly , both these point are decided in favour of the workman.

POINT No. 3 : The ld . representative for the workman has contended that after the termination of the workman another employee in his place Smt. Munni Devi was engaged by the management and this fact has been admitted by the witness adduced on behalf of the management. Responding to this submission, the Id . representative for the management contends that after the termination of workman another person was engaged on contractual basis only .

357 G1 /04-12

659

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माथ 25, 1925

On behalf of the workman it has been specifically pleaded that after terminating the services of the workman Smt. Munni Devi was employed by the management and no opportunity of employment was offered to the workman. This fact stands admitted by MW - 1 Shankar Singh who in his cross -examination has admitted that after the termination of the workman another person was employed in his place. On behalf of the management although the subsequent recruitment has been admitted , but it has not been shown that prior to the employment of such person anopportunity of employment was offered to the workman. Thus , the management has acted in clear violation of the provision under section 25 -H of the Act and this point too is decided in favour of the workman and against the management .

POINT No. 5 :-The Id. representative for the management contends that the Meteorological Department is not an industry as defined in the Act . The reason advanced on this account is that the management deals with the forecast of the weather and it is not connected with any production, and as such, It is not an industry, In support ofhis contention the ld. representative relies upon 2001 (R) SLR 188.

Countering the submission advanced on behalf of the management, the id. representative for the workman submits that the management falls within the definition of the industry as defined in the Act and he has referred to thedecision cited in 2001 (7) SLR 112.

1 have carefully gone through the judicial prono- uncements referred to by both the ld. representatives .

Section 2 (1 ) of the Act defines the industry asunder:---

" Industry ' means any business , trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling, service , employment , handicraft , or industrial occupation or avocation of workman. "

The question of interpretation of industry arose before the division bench of the Bombay High Court in the case ofProvince ofBombay Vs Western India Automobile Association and the HonHon'ble court has observed as under:-

There is no indication in the section itself that the undertaking referred to in the definition clause must be an undertaking carried on for the purpose of making profit. But as far as an undertaking is concerned, it is no reason why every undertaking, in order to fall under that sub- clause, must be something done with a view to making profit. The expression ' calling ' is also sufficiently wide to include its activities not necessarily concemed with profit motive . What is really emphasized in this Sub- section is the relationship of employers and workers . If in that undertaking a dispute takes place , then you have a dispute in an industry contemplated by the statute ,

When assessed in the light of the above decision, the non-applicant management falls within the meaning of the definition under section 2 (j ) of the Act .

The Id. representative for the manage . nent has drawn my attention towards 2001 (8 ) SLR 188 and has urged that 660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

in view of this observation made by the Hon'ble court the management in the present case could not be regarded as the industry.

But the referred to decision pertains to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and SERC and the facts of the referred case being distinct are not applicable to the case at hand. Therefore , the Id . representative does not find any assistance from the decision supra. The Id. representative for the workman has drawn my attention towards 2001 ( 7) SLR (Raj . ) 113 , wherein the Hon'ble court has upheld the conclusion drawn by the labour court that the school is an industry under Section 2 (j ) of theAct .

In the present dispute , looking to the facts involved therein on the similar footings , the non - applicant management falls within the scope of industry as defined under section 2 (j ) of the Act. This view is further fortified by thejudicial pronouncement made in the decision reported in the case of Province of Bombay vs. Western India Automobile Association . Hence , this point isdecided against the management and in favour of the sworkman.

POINT ND . 4 : For the foregoing reasons and the conclusions drawn by this court , the workman is entitled for reinstatement in the service .

In the result , the reference is answered in the affirmative in favour of the workman and it is held that the action of the non - applicant management in terminating the workman from service w.e.f. 1-12-2000 is illegal and unjustified. He is entitled to be reinstated in the service with back wages : 50% and in continuity with the service. The arvard is passed in the aforesaid terms .

Let a copy of the award be sent to Central Government forpubl.cation under Section 17 ( 1 ) of the Act .

R.C. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी , 2004

का. आ. 352.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , एस.ई.सी.एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी. आई.टी. /एल.सी./ आर. / 39/2003 ) को प्रकाशित वाती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ सं. एल.- 22012/157/99- आई. आर. (सी.- II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi . the 19th January , 2004

S. O. 352. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Gov- ernment hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGIT/LC / R/39/ 2003 ) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court . Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii ) ] the Industrial Dispute between the management of SECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19-1-2004.

[No. L -22012/ 157/ 99- IR(C-II)] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS- TRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR, COURT,

JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT /LC /R/ 39/2003

Presiding Officer : SHRI SHRIKANT SHUKLA Smt. Usha Gupta. W/o Rampal Gupta, Opp. Durga Mandir , Sidhi Dafai , Rajnagar Colliery,

Shahdol.

Applicant

Versus

The Sub Area Manager , Rajnagar RO of SECL , PO Rajnagar Colliery, Distt. Shahdol ( MP)

Non-applicant

AWARD

Passed on this 7th Day of January , 2004 1.TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L - 22012/ 157 /99 /IR ( C. II) dated 24-9-2001 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

Whether the action of the Sub Area Manager , Rajnagar Open Cast Mine of SECL, PO Rajnagar Colliery , Distt. Shahdol ( MP) in not reinstating Smt. Usha Gupta W/ o Shri Rampal Gupta Halwai workman of Rajnagar Open Cast Mine is legaland justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

2. The original issue was referred for adjudication to the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , Nagpur but the disputant Smt . Usha Gupta, W/ o Rampal Gupta represented against the reference to the CGIT cum Labour Court , Nagpur and requested that the same may be referred to CGIT cum Labour Court, Jabalpur. In the meantime , the Presiding Officer of CGIT cum Labour Court , Nagpur passed No Claim Award on 1-11-2001 . Thereafter the Government of India vide their letter No. L- 22012/ 171 /99 - IR ( C.II) dated 28-2-2003 transfered the said case for adjudication to the Presiding Officer , CGIT, Jabalpur.

3.On receipt of the reference , the notice was issued to Smt . Usha Gupta but Smt . Usha Gupta did not turned up to file the statement of claim.

4. The notice was again issued to her for filing statement of claim on 5-1-2004 by registered post on 28-11-2002 and registered notice and acknowledgement did not returned even after expiry of more than 2 months and [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

661

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

therefore it was believed that the notice is served on Smt . UshaGupta .

5. In spite of the service of notice, Smt. Usha Gupta did not turned up to file statement of claim and therefore it is impossible to adjudicate the issue referred to us. Therefore the reference is unanswered and accordingly the reference is disposed off for want of prosecution .

6. The copy of the award be sent to the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules.

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 353.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.ई.सी.एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर (संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी. /एल.सी./आर./293/ 99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआं था । [सं. एल-22012/182/99- आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th January, 2004

S. O. 353. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Indus- trialDisputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Govemment herebypublishes the award (Ref. CGIT/LC/R/ 293 / 99 ) ofthe Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dis- putebetween the management of Sohagpur Area of SECL, and their workman , received by the Central Government on 19-1-2004

[No. L-22012/ 182/ 1999 -IR( CM - II)] N. P. KEŠAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR Case No. CGIT- LC/R/ 293/99

Presiding Officer: SHRI SHRIKANT SHUKLA TheSecretary JantaMazdoor Sangh (HMS) , Amradandi Store Complex, PO Amlai Colliery,

...Applicant Distt. Shahdol (MP)

Versus

The General Manager ,

....Non-applicant Sohagpur Area of SECL, Shahdol (MP) PO Dhanpuri , Distt . Shahdol

AWARD

Passed on this 8th Day of January , 2004 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L - 22012 / 182 / 99 - IR ( CM.II ) dated 30/31-8-99 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :

"Whether the action of the General Manager , Sohagpur Area of SECL , PO Dhanpuri , Distt . Shahdol in not regularising Shri Ishaque Khan in Cat VI and not promoting as Assistant Foreman in T & S Grade C islegal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. The workman was sent notice by the Government for filing the statement of claim and the relevent documents . list of witnesses with the tribunal within 15 days but the worker did not file any statement of claim.

3. The Secretary , Janta Mazdoor Sangh, concerned Union was sent notice dated 15-11-99, 21-12-99, 24-4-2003 but no statement of claim came forward from the Union . However the Secretary , Janta Mazdoor Sangh filed the authority in the form of Vakalatnama dated 10-6-03 but even then the worker did not file any statement of claim to enable the court to find out the case of workman Shri Ishaque Khan . The concerned Union did not disclose before the tribunal about the grounds of regularisation of the services of Shri Ishaque Khan . The Union has also not raised the issue before the tribunal for not promotion of the worker . The opposite party was also sent several notices but they have also not come forward with any written statement.

4. In the circumstances , aforesaid issue cannot be answered.

5. The copy of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour as perrules .

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 354.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.सी.सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद (संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी. आई.डी. नम्बर-3/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22013/1/2004- आईआर ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th January , 2004

S. O. 354. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Indus- trial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government herebypublishes the award (Ref. No. L: C.I.D . No. 3/2003 ) of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment of SCCL , and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-1-2004.

[No. L -22013/1/2004- IR(C-II)] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer 662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25, 1925

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, AT HYDERABAD PRESENT : Shri E. Ismail , B. Sc . , LL . B. , Presiding Officer

Dated the 28th day of November , 2003 Industrial Dispute No. L.C.I.D. 3/2003 BETWEEN :

Petitioner Sri Hanumanla Mallaiah , H.No. 6-6-532 , Ambedkarnagar , Near Sub Station, Karimanagar

AND

1. The Colliery Manager, Somagudem, 1 Incline, S.C. Company Ltd. Somagudem No. 1 .

2. The General Manager, S. C. Company Ltd. , Bellampalli.

....Respondents 3. The Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co.Ltd. Kothagudem.

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Petitioner Sri S. Bhagwanth Rao , Advocate For the Respondent: M/s . K. SrinivasaMurthy, V. Umadevi , C. Vijay Shekar Reddy, Vijay Venkatesh, Sridhar Karanam, B. Vijay Kumar , L. Adibabu, Prasad, Suresh& Manikonda Praveen, Advocates

AWARD

1. This is a case taken under Sec . 2A (2) of the I.D. Act , 1947 in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Aridhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa andM/s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others and numbered inthis Court as L.C.I.D. No. 3/2003 and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Inspite of several adjournments given from 19-9-2003 for Petitioner's evidence for five adjournments including 28-11-2003 the petitioner has not turned-out . The petitioner is not evincing any interest . There is nothing on record to support the case of the Petitioner . Hence , a 'Nil Award is passed , Transmit .

Dictated to Kum. K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 28th day of November , 2003.

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for

Petitioner

theRespondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

नई दिल्ली, 20 जनवरी , 2004

का. आ. 355.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आन्ध्रा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 184/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -12011 /226/2000- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 20th January , 2004

S. O. 355. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Gov- ernment hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 184/2002 ) of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the In- dustrial Dispute between the management of Andhra Bank and their workman, received by the Central Gov- ernment on 19-1-2004.

[No. L- 12011 /226/2000 - IR(B -II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT , AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT : Shri E. Ismail , B. Sc . , LL. B. , PresidingOfficer Dated the 21st, day of October, 2003

Industrial Dispute No. 184/2002

(Old L.D. No. 2/2001 transfered from Industrial Tribu- nal -cum - Labour Court , Visakhapatnam)

BETWEEN :

The Joint Secretary ,

Pititioner

AndhraBankAward Employees Union , Srikakulam Region, C/ o Andhra Bank, Main Branch , Srikakulam .

AND

TheRegional Manager,

Andhra Bank , Zonal Office , Srikakulam.

Petitioner [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

663

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14, 2004/माष 25, 1925

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Petitioner : M/s . A.V. Sambasivarao & A.S. Rama Sharma, Advocates For the Respondent : M/s . S. Udayachala Rao , S. Lavanya Lakshmi , S. VikramadityaBabau & S.Mujib Kumar, Advocates AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its OrderNo. L- 12011/226/2000- IR (B. II ) dated 29-11-2000 referred the following dispute under Section 10( 1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , Visakhapatnam between the management of Andhra Bank and their workmen. In view ofGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour's Order No. H- 11026/ 1 /2001 - IR (C. II) dated 18-10-2001 this case has been transferedto this Tribunal bearing No. 2/2001 . The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of Andhra Bank Award Employees Union Srikakulam Region for regularisation of services of Smt . A. Ammadamma , Sh . B. Satyanarayana, Smt . J. Rohini , Smt. P. Kamala, Sh. A. Vasudeva Rao , Sh. K. Ammanna Rao , Smt. Ch. Bharathi , Sh . M. Ganapathi Rao and Smt . A. Seetharamamma workingas parttime Sweepers under the Management of Assistant General Manager, Andhra Bank , Srikakulam Zone is legal and/ or justified ? Ifnot what relief the concerned union is entitled ? " The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as 1.D. No. 184/2002 and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Inspite of several adjournments given from 12-3-2003 for evidence of Petitioner's for eight adjournments including 21-10-2003 petitioners have not turned-out . None of the petitioners is present today . The petitioners have failed to produce any evidence in support of their claim. There is nothing on record to substantiate the contention of the Petitioners , Hence, a ' Nil ' Award is passed, transmit.

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 28th day of October , 2003 .

E. ISMAIL, PresidingOfficer Appendix ofEvidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for Petitioner theRespondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 20 जनवरी , 2004

का. आ. 356.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आन्ध्रा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 229/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल.- 12025/1/2004-आई.आर. ( बी.- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिवः NewDelhi, the 20th January, 2004

S. O. 356.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Indus- trial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Govemment herebypublishes the Award Ref. No. 229/2002 of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Andhra Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-1-2004:

[No. L- 12025/ 1/2004- IR(B -II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy..

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT , AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT: Shri E. Ismail, B. Sc. , LL. B. , PresidingOfficer

Dated the 12th, day of November, 2003 Industrial Dispute No. L.C.I.D. 229/2002 BETWEEN

Petitioner Sri Ch .Nageswara Rao , S/o . Ch. Hanumanth Rao , H. No. 3-2-186, Sunargally, Nimboliadda, Kachiguda, Hyderabad.

AND

1. The General Manager, Andhra Bank, Central Office , SultanBazar , Hyderabad.

Respondents 2. The Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Vidyanagar Branch Vidyanagar, Hyderabad

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitoner : M/s . M. Govind , Sudha & K. Ajay Kumar, Advocates

For the Respodent : M/s . S. Udayachal Rao , S. Lavanya Lakshmi , S. Vikramaditya Babu & S. Mujib Kumar , Advocates 664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] AWARD

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Presiding Officer

Shri S : M. Goel

Case No ID . 252/99

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A ( 2 ) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court ofAndhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s. Cotton Corporation of India and two others and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 229/2002 and notices were issued to the parties.

TheGeneral Secretary,

Gurgaon Gramin Bank

WorkersOrganisation ,

731, Adarsh Nagar, Rewari

...Applicant

Vs.

The Chairman,

2. This case has been filed by the Petitioner for reinstatement of his services with the 2nd Respondent . The Respondents filed counter . Petitioner's evidence closed on 3-9-2003 . MW1 field affidavit for deposition . A memo is filed by the Petitioner's Councel today i.e. the 12th November, 2003 stating that the Petitioner's case may be closed as not pressed. Hence , a ' Nil ' Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

GurgaonGramin Bank

HeadOffice, 2069/4 , Gurgaon .

......Respondent

APPEARANCES:

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 12th day of November , 2003.

Forthe Worker

None

E. ISMAIL , PresidingOfficer

None

FortheManagement :

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined for

AWARD

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

theRespondent

NIL

(Passed on 3-12-2003 )

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Central Govt . vide notification No. L : -12011/45/99 IR(B -I) dated 29-11-1999 has referred the following disput to this Tribunal for adjudication :

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 21 जनवरी , 2004

"Whether the of the action of the management o Gurgaon Gramin Bank, Gurgaon in not granting ond additional increment to their employees or. installation of computers as given to the employees oftheir parent Bank ( Syndicate Bank ) is legal and justified, Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman are entitled to?"

AND

का. आ. 357.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार गुड़गांव ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. - 252 /99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 12011/45/99- आई. आर. ( बी. - 1 ) ]

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 21st January, 2004

"Whether the action of the management ofGurgaon Gramin Bank, in not providing pay parity to clerks equal to that of Stenographers in respect of eligible employees ( list of 82 employees are enclosed) marked as Annexure ' E ' is just and legal ? If not , to what relief the Workman are entitled to? "

2. None appeared on behalf of the workman despite notice . It appears that workman is not interested to pursue with the present reference . In view of the above , the present reference is returned to the Central Govt. for want of prosecution . Central Government be informed.

Chandigarh.

S. O. 357. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Indus- trialDisputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (ID/252/99 ) of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Chancligarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Gurgaon Gramin Bank and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 21-1-2004 .

Dated: 3-12-2003 .

S. M. GOEL , PresidingOfficer [No. L - 12011/45/99 -IR(B- I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer, [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

665

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 21 जनवरी , 2004

का. आ. 358.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार गुडगांव ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मचारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( सदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. 144/2 के ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011/39/99- आईआर ( बी-1) ]

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 21st January , 2004

S.O. 358. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( ID - 144/2K) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Gurgaon Gramin Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21-1-2004.

[No. L- 12011/39/99 -IR(B- I)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH PRESIDING OFFICER Sh . S. M. Goel

Case No. I D. 144/2K

The President, Gurgaon Gramin Bank Workers Organisation, 731. Adarsh Nagar, Rewari - 123401

APPLICANT

The Chairman, Gurgaon Gramin Bank, Head Office , 2069, Sector -4 , Gurgaon .

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman .

None

For the Management . None

AWARD

(Passed on 3-12-2003 )

Central Govt. vide notification No. L - 12011 /39/ 99/IR (B -I) dated 15-3-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Gurgaon Gramin Bank by promoting Sri Anil Sardana , Stenographer to the post of Field Officer and in preparing and circulating another seniority list dated 14-3-98 during the pendency of CPS is violation of Section 33-1 ( a ) read with Section 33 - A of Industrial Dispute Act. 1947. "

2. None appeared on behalf of the workman despite notice . It appears that workman is not interested to pursue with the present reference . In view ofthe above, the present reference is returned to the Central Govt . for want of prosecution . Central Govt. be informed.

Chandigarh. Dated 3-12-2003 .

S.M. GOEL, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 21 जनवरी , 2004

का. आ. 359.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार उत्तरी रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मचारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( सदर्भ संख्या आई. डी 25/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-41012/39/95- आईआर( बी-1) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 21st January, 2004

S.O. 359. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( ID - 25 /96) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Northern Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21-1-2004.

[No. L -41012/39/95 -IR(B - I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH PRESIDING OFFICER Sh. S. M. Goel.

Case No. I D. 25/96

Rumali Devi W/ o Sh . Net Ram, Qur . No. T-68 /D Loco Railway Colony , Kurukshetra. Applicant Vs

Inspector of works , Northern Railway, Kurukshetra Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman. None For the,Management . Sh . N. K. Zakhmi

AWARD

(Passed on 4-12-2003 )

Central Govt . vide notification No. L -41012/39/95 /IR (B- I ) dated 19-3-1996 has referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication:

666

( PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

AND

The Asst . General Manager,

(Personnel & HRD) ,.

State Bank of India ,

LocalHead Office ,

"Whether the action of the management of Northern Railway representing its Sr. D P. O. , New Delhi and Inspector of works , Kurukshetra ofNew Delhi Division, in terminating the services ofSmt. Rumali Devi , is just, fair and legal. If not, what relief she is entitled to and from what date ?"

Bank Street, Koti ,

Hyderabad -500095.

APPEARANCES

M/sB.G. Ravindra

Forthe Petitioner :

Forthe Respondent

2. None appeared on behalf of the workman despite notice. It appears that workman is not interested to pursue with the present reference . In view of the above , the present reference is returned to the Central Govt . for want of prosecution . Central Govt . be informed.

Reddy, S. Prabhakar

Reddy & B. V. Chandra Chandigarh. Dated 4-12-2003 .

Sekhar , Advocates .

S. M. GOEL, Presiding Officer

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 21 जनवरी , 2004

The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour by its OrderNo. L- 12012/331/2001/IR (B-I) dated 8-1-2002 referred the following dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of State Bank of India and their workman . The reference is,

SECHEDULE

का. आ. 360.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मचारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण व श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( सदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. 72/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/331/2001- आईआर( बी- I) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्कअधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Local Head Office , Hyderabad in terminating the services of Sri E. Narasimha , temporary /Non -Messenger , S.B.l. w.e.f. 31-3-1997 is justified? If not, what relief is the applicant entitled ? "

New Delhi , the 21st January, 2004

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 72/2002 and notices issued to the parties .

S.O. 360.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( ID -72/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21-1-2004.

[No. L- 12012/331/2001 - IR(B -I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

2. Inspite of several adjournments given from 10-5-2002 for filing of claim statement and documents for 17 adjournments including 31-3-2003 the petitioner has not turned- out with claim statement and documents . Inspite of number ofadjournments the petitioner has failed to produce any evidence in support of his claim . His Advocate reported no instructions from him . There is nothing on record to support the case of the Petitioner . Therefore , the reference is ordered against the petitioner and it is held that the petitioner is not entitled for any relief.

ANNEXURE

Accordingly a ' Nil ' Award is passed, Transmit.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM-LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 31st day of March, 2003 .

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

PRESENT: Shri E. Ismail , Presiding Officer Dated 3 1st day of March, 2003

Witneses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Industrial Dispute No. 72/2002

Respondent

NIL

BETWEEN

Petitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

Sri E. Narasimha , D. No. 18-1-305 , Uppuguda, Mahankali Temple,

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

Hyderabad-53 .

667 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 21 जनवरी , 2004

the management of State Bank of India and their workman. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India. , Triupathi Zone in dismissing the services of Sri T. Venkateshwarlu , ex-messenger is justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled?" का. आ. 361.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मचारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण व श्रम न्यायालय, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. 285/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 285/2002 and notices issued to the parties .

[सं. एल-12012/ 107/2002- आई. आर. (बी- I ) ].

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 21st January , 2004

2. Inspite of several adjournments given from 29-11-2002 for filing of claim statement and documents for 7 adjournments including 31-3-2003 petitioner has not turned -out with claim statentent and documents . Petitioner absent continuously although he received notice through registered post and acknowledgement received . There is nothing on record to substantiate the case of the Petitioner, Therefore, the reference is ordered against the petitioner and it is held that the petitioner is not entitled for any relief.

Accordingly a ' Nil ' Award is passed, Transmit.

S.O. 361. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (ID -285/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-1-2004

[No. L- 12012/ 107/2002-IR(B.F)]

Dictatedto Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 31st day of March, 2003 .

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

B. 18MAIL, Presiding Officer ANNEXURE

Appendix of evidence

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

Witness examined for the Witnesses examined for the Responent

Petitioner

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

NIL

PRESENT : Shri E. ISMAIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner PresidingOfficer

NIL

Dated 31st day ofMarch, 2003

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

Industrial Dispute No. 285/2002

BETWEEN:

नई दिल्ली , 21 जनवरी, 2004 Sri T. Venkateswarlu,

S/o T. Kadirivel, 490, Bhavani Nagar, Tirupathi -517501 .

AND

TheAsst. General Manager ,

का. आ. 362. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मध्य रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण व श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( सदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी. / एलसी/आर/230/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को21-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

State Bank of India , ZonalOffice, Region- II , Tirupathi-517501.

[सं. एल-12012/ 112/96- आई.आर. ( बी- 1 ) ] APPEARANCES :

अजय कुमार , डैस्क अधिकारी

NIL

Forthe Petitioner

: NIL

For the Respondent

New Delhi , the 21st January , 2004 AWARD

S.O. 362. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( No. CGIT/LC /R/ 230/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L - 12012/ 107/2002 - IR (B.I) dated 27-8-2002 referred the following dispute under Section 10 ( 1 )( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between

357G1/04-13 668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Railway and their workman . which was received by the Central Government on 21-1-2004.

[No. L- 12012/112/96 - IR(B.I ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT.

JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT/LC / R/230/97 PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI SHRIKANT SHUKLA Shri Ganesh Prasad Jagannath .

Vill & PO U.D.A.. Harda ,

Distt . Hoshangabad (MP)

Applicant versus

The Divisional Railway Manager .

Central Railway. Habibganj

Bhopal.

Non-applicant

AWARD

Passed on this 8th day of January -2004 1. The Government of India . Ministry of Labour vide its order No. L - 12012/ 112/96 - IR( B ) dated 5-8-96 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal

[PART II-SEC. 3(1 ) , मेंकेन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण कोलकाता ( संदर्भ संख्या 12/2003 ) कौ प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/ 147/2002- आई.आर. ( सी.एम - II) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 21st January, 2004

S.O. 363. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12 / 2003 ) of the Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Kolkata as shown in the Anneuxre , in the industrial dispute between the management of Employees Provident Fund Organisation and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21-1-2004

[No. L -42012/ 147/2002 -IR (CM - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 12 of 2003

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management ofEmployees Provident Fund Organisation . AND

Their workmen

PRESENT : Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Banerji PresidingOfficer.

APPEARANCE :

On behalf of

Mr. O.P. Dubey, Assistant

Provident Fund Comnussioner.

Mr.G.S. Chattopadhyay, Management On behalf of Workmen

"Whether the action ofthe management of Divisional FailwayManager ( P ) . C. Rly.. Bhopal Bhusawal in krminating the services of Shri Ganesh Prasad S/o Sa i Jagannath with effect from 3-5-88 is justified ? foot, what relief the workman is entitled ? " 2."he workman was sent notice by the Government of Ixia. Ministry of Labour for filing the statement of claim and the relevant documents , list of witnesses in the tribun.d within 15 days and the worker did not filed any statement of claim.

3. The workinan Shri Ganesh Prasad Jagannath was sent with a notice dated 8-5-2003 bun neither the workman no his representative turned up for filing the statement of clhun till date.

4. Since the statement of claim in respect of the issue has not been filed by the parties , therefore , the ssue cannot be answered .

5 Copy of the award be sent to the Government of India . Mitustry of Labour as per rules.

SHRIKANT SHUKLA. Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली. 21 जनवरी , 2004

का. आ. 363.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा की 17 केअनुसरण में, ई. पी. एफ. ओ. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद

General Secretary of the Union .

Industry : Provident Fund State: West Bengal Dated : 5th January, 2004 .

AWARD

By Order No. L - 42012 / 147 /2002/IR( CM - II) dated 13-02-2003 the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) and ( 2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Employces Provident Fund Organisation, Calcutta in not paying pay. allowances and other financial benefits to the workmen, who participated in the strike w.e.f.6-2-1998 to 10-3-1998 is legal and justified ? If not , what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to ? "

2. When the case is called out today. representatives of both the parties state that the dispute under the present reference has been settled between the parties out of Court and they have filed the settlement duly signed by them . They pray that an Award in terms of the settlement be passed.

669

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माष 25 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3. Upon consideration of the submission of the parties and also the settlement which is found to be fair, reasonable and in the interest of the parties , I pass an Award in terms of the settlement . Let the settlement be part of this Award as Annexure-A.

Dated, Kolkata ,

The 5th January , 2004

HRISHIKESH BANERJI, PresidingOfficer

ANNEXURE A

BEFORE THE LD . CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA Reference No. 12 of 2003

Name ofparties:

Regional Provident Fund Representing Employer(s ) :

Commissioner, West Bengal

Employees ' Provident

Fund Organisation .

Representing Workmen: Regional Provident Fund StaffAssociation, West

Bengal (Regd. No. 8016) Short Recital of the Case

On the call of Regional Provident Fund Staff Association , West Bengal (Registration No. 8016) , recognised by the Management of Employees ' Provident Fund Organisation under Code of Discipline in Industry "STRIKE" took place from 6th February , 1998 to 10th March, 1998 in all the Provident Fund Offices of West Bengal . The employees who joined their respective offices after participation , in strike upto 26 days were favoured with full salary and allowances by regularization of their absence from duty upto 26 days even by grant of Special Casual Leave , whereas the employees wito could not join for some or other reasons before 33 days and after joining the duty on 34th day, the days of absence for 33 days were not considered for regularization by way of granting any kind of leave . Rather , such period was taken as that of absence without leave and the salary and ailowances for the period of 33.days were not paid . The said period of33 days was treated as that of E.O.L. The stirke was not iiiegal and no Competent Authority declared the said strike as" Illegal " .

Whether the action of the Management of Employees' Provident Fund Organisation , Kolkata is not paying pay, aliowances and other financial benefits to the workmen who participated in the strike w.e.f. 06-02-1998 to 10-03-1998 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to ? With regard to the above issue the following settiement has been arrived at.

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

A settlement was arrived at between the Central Provident Fund Commissioner/Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, West Bengal the employer and the workmen otherwise than in the course of conciliatlon proceedings in the matter of Regularisation of unauthorized absence of 33 days in pursuance of Employees ' Provident Fund Organisation, Head Office letter No. HRM . III/2 ( 3 )/2003/ Misc./19096 dated 06-06-2003 .

Theterms of settlement arrived at in pursuance of the order dated 20-06-2003 of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ( 1) , West Bengal is that on consideration ofall the factors prevailing during the strike period of33 days the period of unauthorized absence from 06-02-1998 to 10-03-1998 should not be treated as break and the said period shall be regularized by grant of regular leave depending on the application of the individual employee and eligibility as on 06-02-1998. The employees are entitled to salary and allowance for the said period along with the consequential benefit of annual increment. The absentee in his representation should have expressed unqualified regret with an assurance that he will not be indulging in such conduct in future .

In the circumstances since the employers Central Provident Fund Commissioner/Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, West Bengal , Employees ' Provident Fund Organisation have already given effect to the prayer and the demand of the Regional Provident Fund Staff Association , which is the subject matter before your honour for adjudication there is no necessity of pursuing the matter any longer .

As such necessary award and/or order may kindly be passed by your lordship .

And for this act of kindness your parties are duty bound shall ever pray .

Sd/-

Representing Employer ( s) P. R. MITRA, Assistant P: F. Commissioner Sd/- Signature of the parties:

Sd/- G. S. CHATTOPADHYAY, General Secretary Regional Provident Fund Staff Association ,

West Bengal (8016)

RepresentingWorkmen Sd/-

Witness:

1 . M.R. YADAV Regional P. F. Commissioner ( II ) W.B.

Sd/-

2. Gobindan Chattopadhyay,

Regional Provident Fund Staff Association , WestBengal

This day of 19th December, 20t03 .

नई दिल्ली, 21 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 364. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947का 14) की धारा की 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीफ, अमुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 102/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/170/89- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डैस्क अधिकारी 670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

New Delhi , the 21st January, 2004

S.O. 364. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 102/92) of the Central Govt. Indus . Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CPWD and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21-1-2004 .

[PART II SEC. 3(ii)]

[No. L-42012/170/89 - IR(DU) ]

KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI Presiding Officer: Shri B.N. Pandey

I.D. NO . 102/92

Shri Prem Parkası .

S/o Shri Mathura Dutt, R/ o . F - 550 , Deoli Village, New Delhi .

Workmen/Claimant .

Versus

Management of CPWD Through : The Engineer, Electrical Divn.No ..

CPWD , J. P. Bhawan , New Delhi - 110001

the grourids that he did not possess ' Wireman Licence ' which was basic requirement. It is further submitted by the workman that the basic qualification is I.T.I. and not the licence which the workman was possessing even before submitting the papers to the Employment Exchange. Evenotherwise petitioner obtained a certificate of licence on 25-6-85 from U.P. and the same was transferred to the Delhi Administration by the order dated 27-3-87. Aphoto copy of the wireman licence dated 29-6-85 and 27-3-87 are annexed to the claim petition as Annexures - IV and V respectively; that the provisions of Section 25 -F of the I.D. Acthave not been complied with and therefore , order of termination is void ab - initio ; that many other persons named-Janardan Parshad , Ranvir Singh , Babu Lal , Harishanker Sharma, Chander Mohan , Asit Roy , Keshar Singh , Kandu, Dilip Kumar , A.K. Shankaran, Satyapal and Brahmanand are still working with the department on the basis of I.T.I. qualifications and not on the basis of any licence as Wireman Gr. -II ; that the licence is not necessary and basic qualifications as the same can be obtained even after appointment andjoining department if need be so . That on raising the dispute by the workman reference has been made by the government on the directions of the Hon'ble High Court . The workman has filed this claim petition praying to set aside the termination order dated 11-2-84 passedby CPWD and his reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits and total back wages.

...Managentent/Respondent

AWARD

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-420 12/170/ 89- I.R. (DU), dated 29-10-92 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :----

"Whether the action of the management of CPWD in terminating the services of Shri Prem Parkash with effect from 12-2-84 is legal and justified ? If not, what relief the workman concemed is entitled to ?" 2. In brief, case of the workman Sh. Prem Parkash , as per his statement of claim , is that he was appointed as a Wireman Grade - II in C.P.W.D. vide order dated 17-6-82; that before giving him appointment the C.P.W.D. had requested the Employment Exchange to sponsor qualified candidates names for the post of Wireman Grade - II and accordingly the Employment Exchange sponsored two names in which petitioner's name was shown as No.1 ; that after examination of all the documents , he (workman) was appointed as per letter dated 17-6-82 as Wireman Gr. - 11 ; that his services were terminated on 21-10-83 without duc compliance of any provisions of law , therefore , he was re -employed when the matter reached for re- conciliation. A true copy of the award showing entire history dated 24-3-87 is annexed as Annexure - Il ! to the claim petition. That his services were again terminated/ retrenched without due compliance of law on 11-2-84 on 3. The clalm of the workman has been opposed by the management of C.P.W.D. by way of filing a written statement. In the written statement it has been inter alia alleged that the answering respondent is not an industry within the ineaning of I.D. Act, 1947; that the workman has concealed the fact that he was not qualified/eligible for the post of temporary Wireman Gr. -II in C.P.W.D.; that the real facts remain that Prem Parkash workman was appointed as a temporary WirernanGr. - II in C.P.W.D.w.e.f. 18-6-82 on purely temporary basis terminable at any time without notice of a single date on daily wages, that the requisite qualifications for the post of Wireman Gr. - Il is holding of Wireman Licence Gr. - Il as per manual Vol . III C.P.W.D .; that the recommendation by the employment exchange sponsoring the name of the petitioner was wrong since he did not possess the requisite qualification for Wireman Grade- Il as mentioned above; that appointment of the petitioner was made due to inadvertence and by mistake, Officer concerned of the CPWD did not verify the educational qualification certificate of the petitioner as he was holding recommendation/sponsor letter from the Employment Exchange authority ; thus the appointment of the petitioner was not proper and could be called non - est; that the petitioner was not having requisite qualification and despite an opportunity being given to him to acquire proper licence , he failed to produce any certificate of licence , hence he was served with one month's notice on 11-1-84 and his service was finally dispensed with on 12-2-84 : that the CPWD has not violated भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

any law of the land, the services of the petitioner were dispensed with after complying with the provisions ; that the petitioner is not entitled to reinstatement, back wages and other consequential relief. His claim is baseless , misconceived and liable to be dismissed.

4. The workman has also filed rejoinder to the written statement of the respondent wherein he has denied the assertions made in the written statement and reiterated his earlier versions made in the statement ofclaim.

5. In evidence both the parties filed various copies of documents . The workman also filed his own affidavit Ex . WW1 / 1 and he was cross - examined by the Management/respondent . On the other hand the management filed affidavit of Shri M.K. Aggarwal , ExecutiveEngineer, Electrical Div . No.1 CPWD as Ex.MW1 / 1 who was also cross - examined on behalf of the workman.

6. I have heard arguments of both the sides, gone through the file and also perused various case laws cited on behalf ofthe parties .

7. Admittedly appointment of the workman was made by the management through a selection process for which his name was sponsored by the employment exchange for the post ofWireman Gr. - II on the request of C.P.W.D. In the affidavit of Shri M.K. Aggarwal, Executive Engineer (MW I ), a witness of Management, it has been alleged that the appointment of the petitioner/ workman was made due to inadvertence and by mistake as the officer concerned of the C.P.W.D. did not verify educational certificate of the petitioner because he was holding recommendation/sponsor fetter from the employment exchange; and thus according to the management, the appointment of the petitioner was not proper and could be called non - est . It has been further alleged by Management that during one of the surprised checks conducted by the Executive Engineer it was found that the petitioner did not possess wireman licence which was minimum requisite qualification for the post ofAssistant Wireman Grade - II ; that the petitioner was given a chance to appear in the examination held in November 1983 to acquire the proper licence but he failed to produce any documentaryproof to prove his passing the examination for obtaining wireman licence , therefore, he was given a notice on 11-1-84 and his services were finally dispensed with on 12-2-84 . In bis cross - examination this witness stated that " there was no mention of the fact that the candidate should be a licence holder when the requisition from the employment exchange was made and that no action was taken against any official for appointing him by mistake. " He again stated that "only the post was indicated to the Employment Exchange and not qualification required for that " . It shows that admittedly there was no mention of pre -requirement of holding a ficence for the post of wireman at that time. In response to the requisition of the management for sending names of

671 candidates for recruitment of muster roll wireman the employment exchange sent names of two candidates namely Prem Parkash/the present workman and Rameshwar Dayal through its letter dated 17-6-82 (Annexure -B) to the application dated 6-7-93 of the management . This letter , on its back side , also shows that Prém Parkash was selected and Rameshwar Dayal was rejected as indicated by words S & ' No ' respectively. Accordingly the workman was appointed and joined on. thepost of Wireman Gr. - II on 18-6-82.

1 8. In proof of his educational qualifications the workman has also filed before this tribunal his National Trade certificate of Ministry of Labour , Government of India, showing that having completed course of training at Industrial Training Institute Sald Mahadev Garhwal , he passed prescribed trade test in the trade of wireman in July, 81. It shows that he had also a certificate ofhaving passed the trade test of wireman before his recruitment to the service on the basis of which his name was sponsored by the employment oxchange. He has also filed a wineman permit dated 29-6-85 given by the U.P. Government on the basis of his having passed the wireman trade test in 1981 . The Delhi Administration has also issued a certificate of competency of class II Wireman dated 27-3-87 . So in absence of requirement of any specific qualification in the requisition letter, the employment exchange cannot be blamed for sending the name of the workman for the post ofwireman grade II , nor the workman can be blamed for concealing his qualification . If, as afleged by the management, due to inadvertence and by mistake the officer concerned of the management did not verify the educational qualification certificate of the petitioner at the time of selection & appointment as his name was sponsored by the employment exchange , the workman cannot be held responsible for that . Moreover this is not a case of concealment of any material fact by the workman or entering into service on the basis of any false certificate. No action at all was taken by the management against its recruiting officer. The workman was also not served with any show cause notice nor any enquiry was held before terminating his services on that ground that he did not possess minimum requisite qualification for that post . So it cannot be made basis of termination of the workman. There was no justification for terminating the services of the workman on this ground for no fault of his own .

9. In a similar case in ' Inderdev Sharma Vs. Govt . National Capital Territory of Delhi and others reported in 2tX02 ( 92 ) FLR 995. The Hon'ble High Court ofDelhi held that:

"the petitioner, was appointed after selection and interview before selection committee - but his services discontinued after four months-on ground thathe was overage and relaxation was not granted by competent authority -held that appointment/ 672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

no evidence to prove flat provision of Sub sections (b ) and ( c) of Section 25 - F of I.D. Act, 1947 were also followed, relaxation as per rules , deemed to have been granted, if not objected to within 15 days . Therefore , order dismissing services of the petitioner was quashed. it was further held that the petitioner had already been appointed , all be it provisionally . This is a salutary provision intended to obviate the impasse of a person commencing his employment and later being told that his appointment was irregular and therefore non - est . The petitioner has already worked for four months , an aspect which cannot be lost sight of . In these circumstances the order terminating services were quashed and the petitioner was reinstated. "

13. Apart from that it is also relevant to note that there is nothing on the record to indicate as to how , and on what basis alleged scrutiny of the qualification of workman was made . It also shows that the alleged scrutiny , if any made exparte and in absence of the petitioner/ workman, no opportunity was given to him as to whether he was possessing any such licence or not . This decision was taken exparte without giving any show cause notice oropportunity to workman to meet and explain it. Therefore, it was also in utter disregard to the provisions of principles ofnatural justice.

14. It has also come in the pleadings and statement of the workman that other juniors to the workman and having similar qualifications as to that of the workman are still working and the management has taken no action against them. This fact has not been specifically denied by the management . Hence this fact also go to show the arbitrariness malafides and illegal activities of the management towards the workman.

15. Inview of the above discussions , I come to the conclusion that the termination order of the workman w.e.f. 12-2-84 was illegal , unjust and against the principles of natural justice. Therefore , it cannot be legally sustained. It deserves to be set aside and accordingly it is quashed. The workman is entitled to be reinstated in service with continuity of service and all consequential benefits .

10. In the instant case the appointment of the petitioner was made after selection and his name was also sponsored by the employment exchange hence his appointment cannot be said to be non - est . He also worked w.e.f. 18-6-8210 11-2-84 for about two years. Therefore, he could not be terminated with out any enquiry , notice and compensation . There could also be no legal retrenchment. The workman has also challenged the termination order on the grounds that his services were terminated w.e.f. 12-2-84 without notice , charge sheet or payment of compensation and it is totally in violation of provisions of Section 25 - F of the I.D. Act . In this regard it is worth to be mentioned that admittedly the workınan had completed more than 240 days of his continuous service during the preceding 12 calendar months . No compliance of provisions (b ) and ( c ) of Section 25 - F was made in his case.As regards compliance of Sub- section (a) it is alleged by the management that one month's notice was given before the retrenchinent but this fact has been denied . Retrenchment compensation was also not been paid to him. The management itself has filed a copy of the alleged notice dated 11-1-84 wherein it was alleged that "during secratiny it was observed that you are not possessing Wireman Grade- 11 licence , which is minimum qualification for the post of Assistant Wireman. Under the circumstances served with one months notice of termination of your services from the date of receipt of this letter"

16. As regards to paynient of back wages , the management has adduced no evidence . It was argued on behalf of theManagement that workman has admitted in his cross - examination that his family expenditure is about Rs.2,500/ - to Rs.3,000/-PM and that he does the work of wireman and also light fittings , So , he is not entitled to back wages . But I do not agree with it . Simply because , he knows, to do or does certain work does not mean that lte has been in some other gainful employment. The burden was on the management to prove that during the forced unemployment caused by the illegal and unjust act of the management , the workman has been in gainful employment, somewhere else , but the management has failed to discharge this burden . Therefore, I am of the view that the workman is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages , continuity of service and all consequential benefits . The management shall reinstate the workman in service within 30 days and pay him full back wages and give all consequential benefits with in two months from the date of publication of the award in the Gazette. Parties shall bear thier own costs . Award is given accordingly .

11. In the aforesaid notice the word ' termination of your services from the date of receipt of this letter ' is also relevant. It shows that it was not a proper and legal notice of one month as required . His services were liable to be terminated after expiry of one month w.e.f. the date of receipt of that letter only and not any other prior or later date . The notice was issued on 11-1-84 and his services were discontinued.w.e.f. 12-2-84. There is nothing on the records to show as to when this notice was served on the workman . So this notice was also not proper and in accordance with law .

BADRI NIWAS PANDEY, Presiding Officer 12 There is nothing on the record to show that wages for the period of notice were paid to him . There is Dated: 20-01-2004 673

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माष 25, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 22 जनवरी, 2004

2-4-96 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

2. When the case is called out today, it is statedby both the parties that the dispute under the present refer- ence has been settled between the parties out of Court and they have filed a Joint Petition of Compromise duly signed tothe effect . They pray for an Award in terms ofthe settle ment.

का. आ. 365.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टैण्डर्ड चार्टड बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण कोलकाता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 45/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 12012/246/2000- आई.आर. ( बी.- I) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 22nd January, 2004

3. Upon consideration of the submission ofthe par- ties and also the terms of the settlement which are foundto be fair, reasonable and in the interest of the parties , I pass an award in terms of the settlement . The Joint Petition of Compromise is made part ofthis Award as Annexure- I .

Dated, Kolkata,

the 5th January, 2004

HRISHIKESH BANERJI, Presiding Officer ANNEXURE I

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CALCUTTA

S. O. 365. In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Indus- trial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (45/2000) of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal , Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Standard Chartered Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on22-1-2004.

Reference No. 45 of2000 [No. L- 12012/246/2000- IR(B -I ) J AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

Inthe mater of : An Industrial Dispute; BETWEEN

ANNEXURE CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 45 of 2000

The Employers in relation to the management of Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Ltd. , Calcutta.

AND

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Ltd. , Calcutta AND Theirworkmen

Their Workman, Sri Asim Pal, Roy's Berth Sandesartala Road, P.O. Chinsurah, Dist. Hooghly, WestBengal , Pin Code-712101.

PRESENT:

Mr. Justice Hrishikesh,Banerji , PresidingOfficer

APPEARANCE :

JointPetition of Compromise between the Workman Mr. Asim Pal (dismissed employee) ofStandard Chartered Bank (formerly known as Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Limited) and the management of Standard Chartered Bank-

Mr. G.C. Chakraborty, Advocate.

Onbehalfof Management

MostRespectfully Sheweth :

Onbehalf of workman :

Mr. Asim Pal , the workman concerned inperson.

State WestBengal Industry Banking Dated: 5th January, 2004

AWARD

1. That the Government of India, in the Ministry of Labour vide their Order No. L- 12012/246/2000 /IR(B -I)dated 31-10-2000 has referred the instant industrial dispute for adjudication to this learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta as to whether the dismissal ofMr. Asim Pal from the services ( dismissed workman ) of Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Limited (now known as Stan- dardCharteredBank ) was justified or not .

By Order No. L. - 12012 / 246/ 2000/ IR (B - I ) dated 31-10-2000 the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) and (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

2. That both parties namely the dismissed workman namely Mr. Asim Pal and the management namely, Stan- dard Chartered Bank have filed their respective Weritten Statements and documents to be relied upon by parties . The reference case was taken up for hearing on the prelimi- nary point as to the validity of the domestic enquiry and "Whether the action of the management of Stan- dard Chartered Grindlays Bank Limited in dismissing Shri Ashim Pal from the scrvices of the Bank w.e.f.

674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 14, 2004/ MAGHA 25 , 1925

the evidence of the dismissed workman Mr. Asim Pal was recorded . The management namely Standard Chartered Bank is to be lead evidence on the next date which may be fixed by the Learned Tribunal after the new Presiding Officer takes charge of the Learned Tribunal Bench .

3. That in the mean time by his Appeal letter dated 23rd August 2002 addressed to The Head -Human Resource ofthe management of the Bank at 23-25 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Fort, Mumbai - 400001 the dismissed workman Mr. Asim Pal approached the Management of the Bank appeal- ing for an amicable settlement of the dispute pending be- fore Learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal , Calcutta and for some financial help for his medical ex- penses for his hernia operation expenses, for his daughter's education and for her marriage etc. and expressing hisde- sire and also undertaking to withdraw the instant reference pending before the Learned Tribunal . A copy of the side Appeal letter dated 23rd August 2002 is annexed hereto and marked ' A' . After due consideration of the above Appeal of the dismissed workman Mr. Asim Pal the management of Standard Chartered Bank on humanitrian ground has agreed to pay an ex- gratia lump sum of Rs . 3,00,000 /- (Rupecs Three lakhs only) within 45 days from the date of final order of this Learned Central Govern- ment Industrial Tribunal . Calcutta disposing off this pend- ing reference and passing the Award by this Learned Tri- bunal . Thedismissed workman Mr. Asim Pal confirms that he has duly received full claim towards Provident Fund of Rs . 1,95.350,17 on 20-2-1998 and Gratuity Rs . 1,43,040/-on 27-3-1997 and that he has no claim whatsoever with the Bank reaffirms and undertakes that he will rot raise any monetary claim or otherwise or dispute before any legal forum/statutory authority with regard to his dismissal from and/ or termination of service or ceasing to be in the em- ployment of the Bank .

4. That the dismissed employce Mr. Asim Pal , in consideration of the above has agreed not to proceed with instant Reference No. 45 of 2000 pending before this Learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal , Calcutta and as such signing and filing this Joint Petition ofCom- promise.

5. Both parties are approaching the Learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal. Calcutta for disposal of the pending Reference case in terms of the settlement arrived at between parties .

Under the above circumstances , it is prayed by both parties that this Learned Central Govern- nient Industrial Tribunal . Calcutta may gra- chously be pleased to pass an Award in terms of settlement arrived at between parties as stated above .

Dated : Kolkata, the 19th day ofAugust 2003 . Sd/-

Signature of Asim Pal

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Signature& Seal on behalf of theBank

19, Netaji Subhas Road,

Kolkata-700001 , India.

Witnesses :

Chiranjib Bhattacharyya Standard Chartered Bank 19 N.S.Road, Kolkata-700001.

ANNEXURE."А"

Mr. Asim Pal 183,Roy'sBaer, P.O. Chinsura, Dt. Hooghly, Pin Code-712101

The Head-Human Resources ,

Standard CharteredBank, 23-25, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Fort, Mumbai -400001 :

Sir,

Discharge with Superannuation Benefits instea of "Dismissal without Notice " Mr. Asim Pal , Staff Calcutta.

Myhumble prayer that 1 have served in ANZGrindlays Banknow taken by your Bank since 6th February 1967 , I was dismessed from service with effect from 2nd April 1996.

The prayers are, please grant me as an Ex- Gratia of rs . 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs ) and another is to give PENSION monthly or otherwise.

Due to such dismissal from service I am facing service financial crisis . That is why I am not maintaining my family expenses as such my daughter's education after graduation and other medical expenses minminum Rs . 500/- permonth .Moreover, I have operated a " HERNIA" opera- tion on last 12th July 2002 then huge amount (Medicines and others ) have expended. Another vital expenses due when I will give my " DAUGHTER'S MARRIAGE " , She is now 23 years of age .

Kindly consider my above prayer sympathtically and grant me as soon as possible . My last promise to you 1 will withdraw all my pending cases against Management in C.G.I.T./Labour Court or elsewhere,

Yoursfaithfully Sd/- (ASIM PAL) Dated 23rd August, 2002.

CopytoMr. Prasanta Sarkar, Head -Human Resources, Standard Chartered Bank , 19 , Netaji Subhas Rd . , Calcutta- 700001 .

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , CALCUTTA Reference No. 45 of 2000 Inthe matter of An Industrial Dispute :

675 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

BETWEEN

COMPLAINTNO. 4 OF 2003 The employers in relation to the management of Standard Charterted Grindlays Bank Ltd. , Calcutta.

AND

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Zonal Training School at Bhuli , Eastern Railway.Dhanbad. ...Opp. Party.

-Versus-

Smt. Saraswati Devi,

Their Workman , Sri Asim Pal, Roy's Berth Sandesartala Road, P.O. Chinsurah, Distt . Hooghly , West Bengal , Pin Code-712101 .

the concerned workman.. Complainant.

State: Jharkhand

Industry:Railway

Dated, Dhanbad the 2nd January , 2004

AWARD

JointPetition of Compromise between the Workman Mr. Asim Pal (dismissed employee) of Standard Chartered Bank ( formerly known as Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Limited) and the management of Standard Chartered Bank .

Khaitan & Co.

This is a complaint petition under Section 33 A of the I.D. Act, 1947 filed by the complainant named above against the O. P. Management.

Advocates Emerald House 1B, Old Post Office Street Calcutta -700001

नई दिल्ली, 22 जनवरी , 2004

2.The complainant in his petion submitted that the Principal , ZTC/Bhuli by issuing a letter No. ZTC /E/2 /B9 / Gr. 2/03-Bhuli dt. 29-9-2003 spared her on 29-9-03 and asked her to join at Howrah as Safaiwala showing the reason that her lien has been fixed at Howrah vide lettter No. CPO/ KK's No. 890/2/31 / TRG/ZTC Bhuli , Pt. V of 19-6-93 . She alleged that Principal ZTC . Bhuli issued that order as she refused to withdraw Ref. Case No. 41/97 which is pending for hearing argument before this Tribunal inspite of pressure created on her .

का. आ. 366.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार जोनल ट्रेनिंग स्कूल, भूली , पूर्वी रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 4/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-41012/23/95- आईआर ( बी- I) ]

अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 22nd January, 2004

S. O. 366. Inpursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (4/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal , No. 2, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Zonal Training School , Buli , Eastern Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government ση 22-1-2004.

[No. L -41012/23/95-IR(B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO. 2) ATDHANBAD

PRESENT:

SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer.

In the matter of an application under Section 33A of the I.D. Act, 1947.

(Arising out ofRef. No. 41 of 1997 ( Ministry's OrderNo. L-410 12/23/ 95 /IR dt. Nil).

3. She submitted that in response to the said letter she being released reported for duty at Howrah but instead ofallowing him to join there a letter dt. 30-9-03 was handed over to her for its communication to the Principal ZTC, Bhuli . In the said letter it was mentioned that due to long period they could not trace out where the lien of the complainant was fixed . Accordingly request was made to the Principal to release the petitioner with a copy of the said letter dt. 19-6-93 and identity card with photo and her specimen signature /LTI duly attested. She submitted that the principal , ZTC Bhuli though handed over a zerox copy of letter No. ZTC/ E/2/RS /Gr . D/03 -Bhulidt. 9-10-03 did not hand over a copy of the letter dt. 19-6-93 . She alleged that the action taken by the Principal was against the provision contained under Section 33F of the I.D. Act, 1947 as because during pendency of the above mentioned reference she has been spared changing the condition of service because she has been spared to work as Safaiwala whereas the terms of Reference is " whether change of designation of Smt. Saraswati Devi Waterman, reverting herback to Safaiwala is justified ? Ifnot to what relief is the concerned workman entitled . " She submitted that she is working as waterman throughout the period since her joining at Dhanbad 23 years back. She alleged that Principal ZTC following unfair labour practices and also with malafide intention not only spared her but also spared another workman Kantilal relying on a reference letter issued about ten years back. She alleged that such action of the Principal was illegal , arbitrary , malafide and it was so done only to victimise him. She submitted that she is widow and got her 35745/ 04-14 676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14, 2004/ MAGHA 25 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] employment in place ofher husband. She further disclosed that she will face serious difficulty if she is asked to join at Howrah as she is living with her old blind mother. In view ofthe facts and circumstances stated above she disclosed that considering the balance of convenience and inconvenience if an order of stay in the matter of enforcement of that order is not issued she will face irreparable: loss and injury .Accordingly the complainant further submitted her prayer to quash the order dt. 29-9-2003 and 9-10-2003 as being in contravention of Section 33 of the 1.D. Act, 1947.

4. O.P. Management of the contrary after filing Written objection have denied all the claims and allegations which the complainant has asserted in her petition . They submitted that the transfer of an employee from one place to another is an incident of service and the employer enjoys that prerogative . They submitted that the complainant got her appointment as " Safaiwala " and placed for work under the O.P. management though her lien was at Howrah. They further decided that the complainant was not transferred but she was spared with direction tojoin at Howrah where she had her lien and for which there is no scope to say that for the said order her service condition has been altered and it violated the provisions as laid down U / S. 33 A ofthe 1.D. Act . They submitted further that the relief which the complainant has sought for is not entitled to get as she has already joined at Howrah i.e. at the place of her lien and is working there .Accordingly the O.P. management submitted prayer to dismiss the petition filed by the complainant with cost.

to her' lien' there she was not allowed to join there and asked her to bring necessary order to that effect along with identity card . Accordingly, she returned back but the O.P. again spared her with direction to join there without handing over the relevant paper relating to her lien. The O.P. management however , in course of hearing categori- cally denied this fact not only but also submitted that they handed over all relevant papers to the petitioner for hand- ing over the same at Howrah . It is their further contention that the complainant has already joined there and to that effect they have received report from the present place of herwork. Here the point for consideration is that whether by such order the O.P. management have violated the ser- vice condition of the complainant ignoring the provision as laid down under Section 33A of the I.D. Act, 1947. From the letterdt . 29-9-2003 issued by the Principal ZTC, Bhuli addressed to Divisional Railway Manager, E. Rly, Howrah , it transpires that the complainant was spared on 29-9-2003 ( Α.Ν.) for her further posting at Howrah Divi- sion, as her lien was fixed at Howrah Division vide letter Ref. CPO/KKK's No. E 890 /2/31/TRG/ZTC, Bhuli Pt . V. of 19-8-93 . The said letter was issued by Chief Personnel Man- agerEastern Railway wherein lien ofGr. D staff engaged at ZTT/Bhuli was fixed. As per the list name of the complain- ant comes in Sl. No. 35 wherein her designation was dis- closed as Safaiwala. As per the said list she joined at ZTC, Bhuli on 12-8-80 and her lien was maintained at Howrah . By letter No. ZTC/E/2 /RS/Gr . D/03 dt . 9-10-2003 Principal, ZTC, Bhuli communicated the order as mentioned above issued by the Chief Personnel Manager to the Divisional RailwayManager, Eastern Railway Bhuli .

FINDING WITH REASONS

5. Considering the petition submitted the complainant as well as Written objection submitted by the O. P. management there is no dispute to hold that the complainnant was initialy posted at ZTC, Bhuli under direct control of the Principal as Safaiwala. There is also no dispute tohold that Ref. case No. 41/97 which was initiated by the complainant is pending before this Tribunal for disposal . In that reference case terms of Reference is as follows:-

기

6. Considering the facts and circumstances dis- cussed above there is no dispute to hold that as Safaiwala the complainant joined at ZTC , Bhuli though her lien was placed at Howrah in view of letter issued by the Chief Personnel Manager. It is seen that the Principal ZTC Bhuli did not issue any order of transfer against the peti- tioner. Actually the Principal spared her for her joining at Howrah where her lien was placed. It has been alleged by the complainant that the Principal will ill motivate arbitrarily and illegally spared her from the present place of her post- ing and thereby changed her service condition which has contravened the provision as laid down U/ S 33A of the I.D. Act.

"Whether change ofdesignation of Smt . Saraswati Devi , Waterman , reverting her back to Safaiwala is justified ? If not, to what relief is the concerned work- man entitled ? "

It is the specific claim of the complainant that by specific order of the O. P. management since long she has beendischarging her duties as waterman . She alleged that as she refused to subdue to the undue influence of the O.P. to withdraw that Ref. case being enraged and with ill mo- tive the Principal ZTC by letter No. ZTC/E/2 / AS/Gr . 2/03 Bhuli dt. 29-9-2003 spared her and asked her to join at Howrah as Safailwala. It has been admitted by the com- plainant that being spared she went to Howrah with a view to join there but due to non availability of the order relating

7. It transpires that Chief Personnel Manager , by letter No. E-890/2 /31 /TRG /ZTS (BHULI) Pt. V dt . 19-8-93 addressed to different Divisional Railway Manager, East- em Railway, requested to take immediate step in the matter ofGr . D staff whose lien have been placed under their Division . It is seen that inspite of issuance of that letter Divisional Railway Manager, Eastern Railway, Howrah did not take any action to issue any letter for withdrawal ofthe complainant from ZTC Bhuli where she was engaged as Safaiwala for her joining under Howrah Division as per lien. On the contrary it was the Principal who spared her.

677 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 14, 2004/माघ 25, 1925

चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 55/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-1-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 40012/210/93- आई.आर. ( डी.यू.) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 22nd January , 2004

S. O. 367. In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Indus- trial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 55/94 ) of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court . Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the einployers in relation to the management of Deptt . of Telecom and their workman, which was receivedby theCen- tral Govemment on 22-1-2004 .

[No. L-40012/210/93- IR(DU)]

KULDIP RAJ VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

SH . S. M. GOEL

PRESIDING OFFICER Case No. ID . 55/94

Sh . Pawan Kumar C /o Sh . Madan Mohan , Advocate. Chamber No. 115. Distt. Courts . Chandigarh .

Applicant.

Vs.

The Supdt . of Telegraph Traffic . Deptt. of Telecommunication . Amritsar Division , Amritsar (PB)

Asstt . Supdt . of Telegraph . Traffic Divisional . Telegraph Office, Pathankot.

Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman.

Sh . Madan Mohan .

Sh . 1. S. Sidhu .

For the Management .

AWARD

(Passed on 16-12-2003 )

Considering all materials on record there is no dispute to hold that as the lien of the complainant was placed under Howrah Division she did not accrue any legal right to re- main at ZTC Bhuli permanently ignoring her lien . Onus is on the complainant to establish that by such order of the Principal her service condition was changed . The com- plainant is a Gr. D staff and on spare she will remain as Gr . D. staff. As there is specific order issued by Chief Personnel Officer , the complainant cannot deny her posting at Howrah where her lien stands . The complainant in course of hear- ing could not explain properly how her service condition was affected being spared by the Principal . It is seen from letter No. EB / Safaiwala/Misc . ( 5) dt. 21-11-03 issued by B.K. Datta APO( 2 ) / Howrah for Divisional Railway Manager . Howrah that the complainant has joined Howrah Division on 23-10-2003 being spared by the Principal ZTC Bhuli . No doubt the complainant submitted a counter affi- davit denying her joining at Howrah Division. Letter issued on behalf of Divisional Railway Manager, Howrah Division as referred to above is an official letter accord- ingly by before distrusting that letter the complainant can- not avoid responsibility to prove that she did not join at Howrah. The complainant in her petition has prayed for stay of the sparing order issued by the Principal ZTC/ Bhuli and also submitted further prayer to quash the said orderdt. 29-9-2003 and 9-10-2003 . It is seen that the com- plainant has already joined to her place of lien. As she has complied the order of the Principal there is no question of passing any order of stay of the impugned order . If the balance of convenience and inconvenience are taken into consideration there is scope to say that the original place of posting of the complainant as per lien is at Howrash . She was spared to join at Howrash and not under any other Division . I consider that within the peripherial limit the Principal is very much empowered to spare any work- man for his / her joining at the place of her lien . Accord- ingly , there is no scope to say that with any malafide inten- tion the Principal arbitrarily and illegally spared her . There is also no scope to consider that for the said order of the Principal service condition of the complainant has been changed or it has violated the provision as laid down un- der Section 33 A of the 1.D. Act . In the result , the following Award is rendered:-

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-4( X) 12/210/93/ IR( DU) dated 13/7/1994 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

The petitioner complainant is not entitled to get any relief and the petition filed by the complainant is re- jected on contest . However . no cost is awarded . "

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

"Whether the action of the Supdt. Telegraph Traffic, Deptt . of Telecom . Amritsar in terminating the services of Sh . Pawan Kumaris legal and justified . If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?"

नई दिल्ली, 22 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 367.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण

2. It is pleaded in the claim statement by the workman that he was employed as waterman - cum- frash in groupD post in the telegraph office, Pathankot at a monthly wages ofRs . 856/- in place of one Rajesh Kuinar who left ( he services. The workman joined tlie service on 3-4-1988 and 357G1/04-15 678

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 14 , 2004/MAGHA 25 , 1925

his work and conduct was satisfactory. His services were terminated on 2-3-1993 without holding any enquiry and charge sheet although he has completed more then 240 days of services in one calander year. It is further pleaded thatthe post is still vacant and the management has violated the mandatory provisions of Section 25 -F of the I.D. Act , 1947 as no retrenchment compensation was paid to him at the time of termination which also a mounts to unfair labour practices . The applicant has thus prayed that he be reinstated in service with full back wages and other benefits.

3. In the written statement the management has pleaded that the applicant was appointed as part time farash vide order dated 3-4-1988/ 8-8-1988 for three hours only and thus the applicant does not fall within the purview of workman as defined under the I.D. Act , 1947. It is further pleaded that the applicant was never appointed in group D cadre. It is further pleaded that group D post was sanctioned for Pathankot on 11-2-1993 and one Jit Ram was surplus at Amritsar, he was adjusted against the sanctioned group D post .It is also denied by the management that workman has ever completed more than 240 days of service in one calandar year. No unfair labour practice has been committed by the management and there fore, it is prayed that there is no merit in the reference and the same deserves rejection.

4. In evidence the applicant filed his affidavit and documents Ex. W2 to W9 . In rebuttal the management produced the affidavit of Kuldeep Raj as MWI and documents Ex.M2 and M3 .

cited by the Ld . Counsel for the workman. It is admitted case of the workman that as per appointment letter and the stand taken in the claim statement , the applicant was engaged as a farash Part Time ' against Rajesh Kumar Part Time Farash ' whose services were terminated and it was clearly stated in the appointment letter that he was engaged on purely temporary and ad hoc basis and he can be disengaged wihout any prior notice or cause . Ex.M3 is the letter dated 22-2-1993 in which one post of Farash cum- waterman in DTO was sanctioned which was not on part time basis and one Jeet Ram who volunteered himself to work in DTO Pathankot was appointed as Frash - cum- Waterman, As the applicant was working as Part Time Farash for three hours and the regular post was sanctioned for DTO Pathankot the applicant as a matter of right can not claim the regular post of Farash- cum - Waterman and in my considered opinion the applicant cannot claim for the regular post . One Sh . Jeet Ram had volunteered to work as Waterman - cum-Farash as DTO Pathankot against newly created post, so the action of the Management in transferring Sh . Jeet Ram from Amritsar to Pathankot and posting him as Frash- cum - Waterman is fully justified, the Judgements cited by the Ld. Counsel for the workman are that the employees who are working on part time basis are workmen . But the services ofthe applicant vvas terminated in accordance with the appointment letter and therefore, his termination was not in violation of Section 25 - F of the I.D. Act , 1947, and the Management was under no obligation to pay the workman retrenchment compensation and also one month notice. The Management has also denied that the applicant has completed 240 days of service within one calender year preceding to the date of termination. The applicant by any evidence or documents, not proved this averment during the proceeding , therefore, it is held that the workman has also not completed 240 days service in one calendar year preceding to the date of termination . I find no merit in the present reference the same is returned against the workman . Central Govt. be informed.

Dated: 16-12-2003

S. M. GOEL. Presiding Officer

Place: Chandigarh .

नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2004

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the evidence and record of the case. se learned counsel for the workman has argued that the services of the workman were terminated in violation of the mandatory provisions of Section 25 -F of the I.D. Act , 1947 as he had already completed more than 240 days of service in one calendar year on part time basis as per his appointment letter . The learned counsel for the workman has further argued that one Jeet Ram was accommodated when the regular post was sanctioned and the post was not given to the workman thus the Management has gravely violated the Provisions of I.D.Act . which also amounted to unfair labour practice. He has also relied on 1984 Labour Industrial Cases NOC 84 ( Punjab and Haryana) Page 41 and Labour and Judicial Reports 2001 ( 1 ) Page 338 , 2002 (6 ) SLR Page 533 and 1990 LAB 1.C.1451 . On the other hand the Learned Counsel for the Management has argued thatthe workman was appointed on part time basis and lus services were terminated and he cannot claim Group 'B ' Post as he was only appointed on part time basis . It was mentioned in appointment letter Ex . W2 that his services can be disengaged without prior notice or cause , therefore , the workman cannot claim the regular post of Class IV.

का.आ. 368.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 मार्च, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

"जिला मुजफ्फरनगर की तहसील सदर के अन्तर्गत आने वाले 6. I have gone through the rival contention of the parties and have also thorouglily considered the authorities 679

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 14 , 2004/माघ 25, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राजस्वग्राम बिहारी, निराना ( जानसाथ रोड ) पचेड़ा, मुस्तफाबाद, मखियाली, कुकड़ा, भण्डुरा, जटमुझेरा ( भोपा रोड ) " ।

विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 13 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है , उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए । [संख्या एस-38013/05/04- एस.एस. - 1 ]

के० सी० जैन, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 5th February, 2004

अतः अब , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप - खण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[संख्या एस-11017/11/97- आई.आर. ( पी.एल. ) ] जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

New Delhi , the 5th February , 2004 S. O. 368. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st March , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 wluch have already been brought into force ) and chapter V and VI ( except sub- section (i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77. 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh , namely:-

S. O. 369. Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest required that the services in the Copper Mining Industry which is covered by item 13 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , should be declared to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act .

"Areas comprising the revenue villages:-Bihari . Nirana ( Jansath Road ) , Pacheda , Mustfabad , Mukhyali . Kukada , Bhandura , Jatmuyera (Bhopa Road) in Tehsil Sadar of District Muzaffar Nagar . "

[No. S-38013/05/2004-SS. I ]

K. C. JAIN , Director

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- clause ( vi ) of clause (n) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act for a period of six months.

नई दिल्ली , 5 फरवरी, 2004

[No. S- 11017/ 11 /97- IR( PL) |

J. P. PATI , Jt . Sccy .

का.आ. 369.- केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट है कि लोकहित में ऐसा अपेक्षित है कि ताम्बा खनन उद्योग में सेवाओं को जिसे औद्योगिक

Printed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .