This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD . No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-02 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 21.]

नई दिल्ली, मई 16-मई 22 , 2004 , शनिवार/वैशाख 26 ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926 NEW DELHI , MAY 16-MAY 22, 2004, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 26- JYAISTHA 1, 1926

No. 21]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3- उप- खण्ड (ii)

PART II-Section 3-Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issuedby the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

राष्ट्रपतिसचिवालय (प्रशासनअनुभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 1 मई, 2004

का. आ. 1174.-" सिगरेट व अन्य तम्बाकू उत्पाद ( व्यापार व वाणिज्य, उत्पादन, आपूर्ति और वितरण के विज्ञापन व विनियमन का निषेध ) अधिनियम, 2003 " के अनुच्छेद 25 द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए राष्ट्रपति सचिवालय एत‌द्वारा अवर सचिव (प्रशासन) को अधिकारी के रूप में प्राधिकृत करता है, वे उक्त अधिनियम के अनुच्छेद 4 के अन्तर्गत कार्रवाई करने में सक्षम होंगे ।

[सं. बी-11011/4/01 -प्रशा. ]

आर.एस. राणा, अवर सचिव ( प्रशा. ) PRESIDENT'S SECRETARIAT (Administration Section)

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2004 S.O. 1174.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 25 of "The Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition ofAdvertisement and Regulation of Trade and 1496 GI/2004

Commerce, Production , Supply and Distribution ) Act, 2003", the President's Secretariat hereby authorizes Under Secretary ( Administration) as the officer who shall be competent to act under Section 4.of the said Act .

[No. B- 11011/4/01 - Admin. ] R. S. RANA, Under Secy. (Admn. ) मंत्रिमंडल सचिवालय

नई दिल्ली, 7 मई, 2004

का. आ. 1175.-अपराधिक प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार श्री उदित कुमार सरकार, अधिवक्ता को सीबीआई केस आर.सी. 3 ( एस) /87/ एसआईयू- II/एसआईसी-1/नई दिल्ली (अध्यक्ष, झारखंड मुक्ति मोर्चा निर्मल महत्तो हत्याकांड) जोकि अतिरिक्त जिला जज , जमशेदपुर, झारखंड की अदालत में विचाराधीन है, इससे संबंधित व आनुषंगिक किसी अन्य मामलों में विशेष लोक अभियोजक नियुक्त करती है ।

[सं. 225/21 /2004- डी. एस . पी. ई. ] शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव

(2329) 2330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 11 मई, 2004

CABINET SECRETARIAT NewDelhi , the 7th May, 2004

का. आ. 1177.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो के रिटेनर कांउसेंल श्री गोबिंद सरन हजेला, अधिवक्ता, इलाहाबाद को दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा अन्वेषित मामलों से उद्भुत अभियोजन, अपीलों , पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य कार्यवाहियों का संचालन करने के लिए इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

S.O. 1175.-- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri .Udit Kumar Sarkar , Advocate , as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting the trial of the case in the Court of the Additional District Judge, Jantshedpur in case RC - 3 ( S)/87/ SIU - II / SIC- I/New Delhi murder of Nirmal Mehto , President , Jharkhand Mukti Murcha) and any other matter connected therewith and acidental thereto .

[सं० 225/ 15/2003 -डी० एस० पी०ई ० ]

शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th May, 2004 [No. 225/ 21 /2004-DSPEJ SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 7 मई, 2004

का. आ. 1176.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निम्नलिखित अधिनियमों ये सभी अपराधों को दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा अन्वेषित किए आनेवाले अपराधों के रूप में विनिर्दिष्ट करती है , नामतः-

S.O. 1177. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Govind Saran Hajela, Advocate, Allahabad a Retainer Counsel of Central Bureau of Investigation in the Allahabad High Court as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution , appeals, revisions orother proceedings arising out of the cases investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment, in the Allahabad HighCourt.

( क ) कर्नाटक संगठित अपराध नियंत्रण अधिनियम, 2000 2. कर्नाटक स्टाम्प अधिनियम, 1957 और

[No. 225/ 15/2003 -DSPE]

SHUBHA THAKUR , Under Secy.

गृह मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 14 मई, 2004

(ख ) उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों को ।

[सं० 228/35/2004- डी० एस०पी०ई ० ]

शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th May, 2004

का. आ. 1178.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में, गृह मंत्रालय के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय में हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान रखने वाले कर्मचारियों की संख्या 80 % से अधिक हो जाने के फलस्वरूप उन्हें एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है :

$.0 . 1176. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by

1946 (Act No.25 of 1946 ), the Central Government hereby

कार्यालय कमांडेंट -153 बटालियन , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल

[सं० 12017/1/2004- हिन्दी] Fection 3 of the Defhi Special Police Establishment Act , pufies all the offences in the following Acts as offences whois ne to be investigated by the Delhi Special Police

ishme namely: --

राजेन्द्र सिंह, निदेशक (राजभाषा )

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

The Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act . 2000

New Delhi , the 14th May, 2004

2. The Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

S.O. 1178. In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 1 ofthe Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following office ofthe Ministry of Home Affairs where the percentage of Hindi knowing staff has gone above 80%:

(b) Attempts , abetinents and conspiracies in rela- tion to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offer ces committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

Office of the Commandant - 153 Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force

[No. 228/35/2004 - DSPE]

SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy .

[No. 12017/1 /2004-Hindi ] RAJENDRA SINGH, Director (OL) 2331

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्वविभाग )

केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड नई दिल्ली, 26 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर )

का. आ. 1179.-आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( V) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " श्री गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह फाउंडेशन, चंडीगढ " को वर्ष 1996-1997 से 1998-1999 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप- खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(1) कर - निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल दाखिल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 119/2004/फा. सं. 197/23/2004- आईटीए-1 ]

ई.पी.एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue)

CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES New Delhi , the 26th March, 2004 (INCOME-TAX)

S.O. 1179.- In exercise ofpowers conferred by the sub -clause (V) ofclause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ), the Central Govemment hereby notifies the "Guru Gobind Singh Foundation , Chandigarh " for the purpose of the said Sub- clause for the assessment years 1996-1997 to 1998-1999 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of Jewellery, furniture etc.) foranyperiod during the previous years relevant tothe assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section (5 ) of Section 11;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives. [Notification No. 119/2004/F.No . 197/23/2004- ITA- I ] I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 1 अप्रैल, 2004

का..आ. 1180.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4 ) केअनुसरण में राजस्व विभाग के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों, जिनके 80% सेअधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्:-

कार्यालय

शहर

(2)

(1)

शिमला मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, रेलवे बोर्ड भवन, शिमला आयकर आयुक्त कार्यालय , रेलवे बोर्ड भवन , शिमला आयकर आयुक्त ( अपील ) , शिमला आयकर अपर आयुक्त, एस.डी.ए. काम्प्लैक्स, कसुम्प्टी आयकर उपायुक्त ( सर्कल ) , एस.डी.ए. काम्प्लैक्स, कसुम्प्टी आयकर अधिकारी , वार्ड-1, एस.डी.ए. काम्प्लैक्स, कसुम्प्टी आयकर अधिकारी, वार्ड-2, एस.डी.ए. काम्प्लैक्स, कसुम्प्टी आयकर अधिकारी, वार्ड -3 , एस.डी.ए. काम्प्लैक्स, कसुम्प्टी आयकर अधिकारी , रामपुर, बुशहर

सोलन आयकर अपर आयुक्त, सोलन आयकर उपायुक्त, सर्कल सोलन आयकर अधिकारी , वार्ड -1 , सोलन कर वसूली अधिकारी, सोलन 2332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

(1)

(2)

परवाणु आयकर अधिकारी कार्यालय

नाहन आयकर अधिकारी कार्यालय

मण्डी आयकर अपर आयुक्त, मण्डी रेंज, मण्डी आयकर सहायक आयुक्त ( सर्कल ) , मण्डी आयकर अधिकारी , वार्ड-1 , भण्डी

बिलासपुर आयकर अधिकारी कार्यालय

आयकर अधिकारी कार्यालय

हमीरपुर

आयकर अधिकारी कार्यालय

कुल्लू

पालमपुर आयकर संयुक्त आयुक्त, पालमपुर रेंज, पालमपुर आयकर सहायक आयुक्त ( सर्कल ) , पालमपुर आयकर अधिकारी वार्ड -1 , पालमपुर आयकर अधिकारी वार्ड-2 , पालमपुर कर वसूली अधिकारी, पालमपुर

आयकर अधिकारी कार्यालय

नूरपुर

डलहौजी आयकर अधिकारी कार्यालय

ऊना आयकर अधिकारी कार्यालय

[ फा. सं. 11011/5/2002- हिन्दी-3 ] स्नेहलता श्रीवास्तव , संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi , the 1st April , 2004

S.O. 1180.-In pursuance ofSub -rule (4) ofRule 10 ofthe Official Language (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following office of the Department ofRevenue, whereof more than 80% of the staff have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi:--

Office

City

Simla Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Railway Board Bhawan, Simla. Officeofthe Income- Tax Commissioner, Railway Board Bhawan, Simla.

Commissioner of Income- Tax (Appeal), Simla. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, S.D.A. Complex, Kusumpti.

Deputy Commissioner of Income - Tax, (Circle) , S.D.A. Complex, Kusumpti.

Income-Tax Officer, Ward-I , S.D.A. Complex, Kusumpti.

Income-TaxOfficer , Ward-II, S.D.A. Complex, Kusumpti .

Income-TaxOfficer, Ward- III, S.D.A. Complex, Kusumpti.

Income-TaxOfficer, Rampur, Bushher.

Solan Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax, Solan.. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle Solan.

Income-Tax Officer, Ward- I, Solan. TaxRecovery Officer, Solan.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1

Parvanu Office ofthe Income- Tax Officer.

Nahan Officeofthe Income-Tax Officer .

Mandi Additional Commissioner of Income -Tax, Mandi Range,Mandi. Asstt . Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle) , Mandi.

Income-TaxOfficer , Ward -1, Mandi .

Bilaspur Office ofthe Income- TaxOfficer .

Hamirpur Office ofthe Income TaxOfficer.

Kullu Officeofthe Income-TaxOfficer.

Palampur Joint Commissioner of Income-Tax, Palampur Range,Palampur. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Circle), Palampur.

Income-TaxOfficer, Ward - I, Palampur. Income-TaxOfficer, Ward - II, Palampur .

Tax RecoveryOfficer, Palampur..

Nurpur Office of the Income- Tax Officer ,

Dalhauzi Office of the Income-TaxOfficer,

Una Office ofthe Income- TaxOfficer,

F. No. 11011/5/2002-Hindi -3 ]

[ SNEHLATA SHRIVASTAVA, Jt. Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 5 अप्रैल , 2004 (आयकर)

का. आ. 1181.-आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ) के उपखंड ( V ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " श्रीभदुज्जैनी सद्दधर्म सिंहासन श्री तारालाबालू जगद्गुरू बृहनमठ, श्रीगेरि, कर्नाटक " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तोंके अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(1) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

2333

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी , जोकि कारोबर से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियों और परिसम्पत्तियों समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 133/2004/फा. सं. 197/40/2004- आई.टी.ए.- 1 ]

आई.पी.एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 5th April, 2004

(INCOME- TAX)

S.O. 1181.-In exercise ofpowers conferredby the sub-clause (v) of clause (23C) of Section 10 ofthe Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Srimadujjayini Saddharma Simhasaana Sri Taralabalu Jagadguru Brihanmath, Sirigere, Karnataka" for the purpose of the said sub -clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other thanvoluntary contributions receivedand maintained in the form ofJewellery, furniture etc. ) foranyperiodduring the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section (5 ) of Section 11;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income. before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisationwith similar objectives .

[NotificationNo. 133/2004/F.No. 197/40/2004- ITA-I] I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(स्वास्थ्यविभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1182.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद अधिनियम , 1956, ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्‌द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्तअनुसूची में-

(3)

(क) " अन्नामलाई विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने ' मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हता' शीर्षक [ जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् स्तंभ ( 2 ) कहा गया है] के अधीन अन्तिम प्रविष्टि और ' रजिस्ट्रीकरण के लिए संक्षेपाक्षर ' शीर्षक [ जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् स्तंभ (3 ) कहा गया है ] के अधीन उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:- (2)

" बाल स्वास्थ्यमें डिप्लोमा अस्थिरोग विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा

डी. सी. एच.

डी. आर्थो.

(ये अर्हताएं तभी मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हताएं होंगी जब ये राजा मुथैया मेडिकल कालेज, अनामलाई नगर में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त कर रहे छात्रों के संबंध में सितम्बर, 2002 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हों ) ;

2334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JY AISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (2)

(3)

संज्ञाहरण विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा

डी. ए.

स्त्रीरोग एवं प्रसूतिविज्ञान में डिप्लोमा

डी. जी. ओ.

मेडिकल रेडियोलाजी डायग्नोसिस में डिप्लोमा

डी. एम. आर. डी.

नेत्र विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा

डी. ओ.

काय चिकित्सा ( रेडियो डायग्नोसिस ) में डाक्टर

एम. डी. ( रेडियो डायग्नोसिस)

(ये अर्हताएं तभी मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञानं अर्हताएं होंगी जब ये राजा मुथैया मेडिकल कालेज, अन्नामलाई नगर में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त कर रहे छात्रों के संबंध में अक्तूबर, 2002 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हों ) ;

एम. डी. ( त्वचा विज्ञान, रति रोग विज्ञान और कुष्ठ रोग )

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( त्वचा विज्ञान , रति रोग विज्ञान और कुष्ठरोग)

(यह अर्हता तभी मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हता होगी जब यह राजा मुथैया मेडिकल कालेज, अनामलाई नगर में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त कर रहे छात्रों के संबंध में दिसम्बर, 2002 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) " । (ख ) " भारतीदासन विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने स्तंभ ( 2 ) में , अन्तिम प्रविष्टि और स्तंभ ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सामान्य काय चिकित्सा)

एम. डी. (सामान्य काय चिकित्सा)

नेत्र विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा

डी. ओ.

आर्थोपेडिक्स में डिप्लोमा

डी. आर्थो .

(ये अर्हताएं तभी मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हताएं होंगी जब ये तंजावुर मेडिकल कालेज, तंजावुर में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त छात्रों के संबंध में 1982 से 1987 प्रदान की गई हों) ;

डिप्लोमा इन लैरिंगोलाजी और ओटोलाजी

डी. एल. ओ.

बाल स्वास्थ्यमें डिप्लोमा

डी. सी. एच.

(ये अर्हताएं तभी मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हताए होंगी जब ये तंजावुर मेडिकल कालेज, तंजावुर में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त छात्रों के संबंध में अप्रैल, 1979 से 1987 तक प्रदान की गई हो) ;

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( बाल रोग चिकित्सा )

एम. डी. ( बाल रोग चिकित्सा)

(यह अर्हता तभी मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हता होगी जब यह तंजावुर मेडिकल कालेज, तंजावुर में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त छात्रों के संबंध में अप्रैल, 1983 से 1987 तक प्रदान की गई हो );

मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( सामान्य शल्य चिकित्सा)

एम. एस. ( सामान्य शल्य चिकित्सा)

( यह अर्हता तभी मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हता होगी जब यह तंजावुर मेडिकल कालेज, तंजावुर में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त छात्रों के संबंध में मार्च, 1978

से 1987 तक प्रदान की गई हो ) ;

(ग) " डा. एम. जी. आर. आयुर्विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय, मद्रास ", के सामने स्तंभ ( 2 ) में अन्तिम प्रविष्टि और स्तंभ ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टिके पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्: - 2335 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926 .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(3)

(2)

डी. एम. ( सी.एल. रूधिर विज्ञान )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( क्लिनिकल रूधिर विज्ञान )

(ये अर्हता तभी मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हता होगी जब यह क्रिश्चियन मेडिकल कालेज, वैल्लोर में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त छात्रों के संबंध में मार्च, 2002 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो) " ;

(घ) " श्री रामचन्द्र मेडिकल कालेज एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान , चेन्नई" के सामने स्तंभ ( 2 ) में, अन्तिम प्रविष्टि और स्तंभ ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

(3)

(2)

एम. डी. ( त्वचा विज्ञान, रति रोग विज्ञान और कुष्ठ रोग )

"डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( त्वचा विज्ञान, रति रोग विज्ञान और कुष्ठ रोग )

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( शरीर रचना विज्ञान )

एम. डी. ( शरीर रचना विज्ञान )

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (कम्युनिटी मेडिसिन)

एम. डी. ( कम्युनिटी मेडिसिन )

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( शरीर क्रिया विज्ञान )

एम. डी. ( शरीर क्रिया विज्ञान )

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( फार्माकोलाजी)

एम. डी. ( फार्मा. ) made

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( पैथोलाजी)

एम. डी. ( पैथोलाजी )

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सूक्ष्मजीव विज्ञान )

एम. डी. ( सूक्ष्मजीव विज्ञान )

मजिस्ट्रार चिरूरगेई (न्यूरो सर्जरी )

एम. सी. एच. ( न्यूरो सर्जरी )

(ये अर्हताएं तभी मान्यताप्राप्त अर्हताएं होंगी जब ये जून , 2003 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हों) ।

मजिस्ट्रार चिरूरगेई ( कार्डियोथोरेसिक सर्जरी )

मजिस्ट्रार चिरूरगेई ( जेनिटो- यूरिनरी सर्जरी )

एम . सीएच. ( सी. टी. एस. )

एम. सीएच. ( जेनिटो- यूरी. सर्जरी )

(ये अर्हताएं तभी मान्यताप्राप्त अर्हता होंगी जब ये नवम्बर, 2003 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हों ) । "

[फा. सं. वी. 11015/5/2004. एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

पी. जी. कलाधरन , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department ofHealth)

New Delhi , the 28th April , 2004

S. O. 1182. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule -

(a) against "Annamalai University " , under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification ' [ hereinafter referred to as column (2 ) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration' [herein- after referred to as column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

2336

THE GAZETTEOF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] (2)

(3)

D. C. H.

"Diploma in ChildHealth

D.Ortho.

Diploma in Orthopaedics

(These shall be recognised qualifications when granted in or after September, 2002 in respect of students being trained at Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalainagar) .

D.A.

Diploma in Anaesthesiology

D. G.O.

Diploma in Gynaecology and Obstetrics

D. M. R. D.

Diploma in Medical Radiology Diagrosis

D.O.

Diploma in Ophthalmology

Doctor ofMedicine (Radio -Diagnosis)

M. D. (Radio -Diagnosis)

(These shall be recognised qualifications when granted in or after October, 2002 in respect of students being trained at Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalainagar) .

M. D. (Derm. , Vene. , and Lep.)

Doctor ofMedicine (Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy)

(Thisshall be a recognised qualification when granted in or after December, 2002 in respect of students being trained at Rajah MuthiahMedical College, Annamalainagar) ." ;

(b) against "Bharathidasan University", in column(2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3) , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

M. D. (Genl . Med. )

"Doctor ofMedicine (General Medicine)

D.O.

Diploma in Ophthalmology

D.Ortho.

Diploma in Orthopaedics

(These shall be recognised qualifications when granted from 1982 to 1987 in respect of students trained at Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur) .

D.L.O.

Diploma in Laryngology and Otology

D. C. H.

Diploma inChildHealth

(Theseshallbe recognised qualifications when granted fromApril, 1979 to 1987 in respect of students trained at Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur) .

M. D. (Paed .)

Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)

(These shallbe recognised qualifications when granted fromApril, 1983 to 1987 in respect of students trained at ThanjavurMedical College, Thanjavur) .

Master of Surgery (General Surgery)

M. S. (General Surgery)

(These shall be recognised qualifications when granted from March, 1978 to 1987 in respect of students trained at Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur) ." ,

(c) against " Dr. MGR Medical University, Madras " , in column (2) , after the last entry and entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely : -

(2)

(3)

D. M. (Cl . Haematology)

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Clinical Haematology)

(These shall be recognised qualifications when granted in or after March, 2002 in respect of students trained at Christian Medical College, Vellore)." ;

2337

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (il) ]

(d) against " Sri Ramacharidra Medical College and Research Institute , Chennai " , in column (2 ) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted , namely:-

(3)

(2)

M. D. (Derm. , Vene . , & Lep.)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy)

M. D. (Anatomy)

Doctor ofMedicine (Anatomy)

M. D. (Com.Med.)

Doctor ofMedicine ( Community Medicine)

M. D. (Phys .)

Doctor ofMedicine (Physiology )

M. D. (Pharm.)

Doctor ofMedicine (Pharmacology)

M. D. (Path. )

Doctor ofMedicine (Pathology)

M. D Micro.)

Doctor ofMedicine (Microbiology)

MCh. (Neuro-Surgery)

Magistrar Chirurgiae (Neuro -Surgery )

(These shall be recognised qualifications when granted in or afterJune, 2003)

M. Ch. (CTS)

Magistrar Chirurgiae (Cardio Thoracic Surgery)

M. Ch . (Genito-Uri . Surg. )

Magistrar Chirurgiae ( Genito - Urinary Surgery)

(These shall be recognised qualifications when granted in or after November, 2003 )." .

[F. No. V. 11015/5/2004-ME(Policy-I) ]

P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1183.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय आयुविज्ञान परिषद अधिनियम, 1956 , ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

उक्त अनुसूची में-

(क ) शीर्षक " मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता!" [ अब के बाद कालम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अधीन " बी. एन. चक्रवर्ती विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपाक्षर " [ अब के बाद कालम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अधीन अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्: -

(3)

(2)

एम. डी. ( भेषज विज्ञान )

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( भेषज विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी , जब यह पं. बी. डी. शर्मा स्नातकोत्तर आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान, रोहतक में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1976 तथा फरवरी , 1977 के बीच प्रदान की गई हो ) ";

(ख) " कलकत्ता विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अन्तिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

(3)

(2)

एम.डी. ( क्षय एवं श्वसनी रोग )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( क्षय एवं श्वसनी रोग )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त अर्हता होगी जब यह कलकत्ता नेशनल मेडिकल कालेज , कलकत्ता में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1975 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गईहो);

1496G1/2004-2 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 2338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

(3)

(2)

एम. सी. एच ( बाल रोग सर्जरी)

मैजिस्ट्रार चिरूरगई ( बालरोग सर्जरी )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एन. आर. एस. मेडिकल कालेज, कलकत्ता में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अगस्त, 1981 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो.)";

(ग ) " चौधरी चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्मलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

डी. सी. एच.

" बाल स्वास्थ्यमें डिप्लोमा"

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एल. एल. आर. एम. मेडिकल कालेज, मेरठ में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1976 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो) ";

( घ ) " डिब्रूगढ़ विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंत : स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्ः-

(3)

(2)

एम. डी. (सामुदायिक चिकित्सा/एस.पी. एम. )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सामुदायिक चिकित्सा/सामाजिक एवं निवारक चिकित्सा)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह असम मेडिकल कालेज, डिब्रूगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1997 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो) ";

एम. डी. ( सूक्ष्मजीव विज्ञान )

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सूक्ष्मजीव विज्ञान )

(यह एकमाताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह असम मेडिकल कालेज, डिब्रूगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में मई, 1992 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगईहो)";

एम. डी. (त्वचा रोग विज्ञान )

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (त्वचा रोग विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह असम मेडिकल कालेज, डिब्रूगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में जून, 1995 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान

कीगई हो )".

(ड. ) " हिमाचल प्रदेश विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम (3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एम. डी. ( सूक्ष्मजीव विज्ञान )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सूक्ष्मजीवविज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह इंदिरा गांधी मेडिकल कालेज, शिमला में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में मई, 1988 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ) ";

(च) " कुरूक्षेत्र विश्वविद्यालय ', के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एम. डी. ( भेषज विज्ञान )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( भेषज विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह पं. बी. डी. शर्मा स्नातकोत्तर आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान, रोहतक में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1974 तथा 1976 के बीच प्रदान की गई हो )";

2339

भारत का सबपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

( छ ) " महर्षि दयानंद विश्वविद्यालय, रोहतक ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

(3)

(2)

एम. डी. ( भेषज विज्ञान)

"डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( भेषज विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह पं. बी. डी. शर्मा स्नातकोतर आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान, रोहतक में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अगस्त, 1977 अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो )";

(ज ) " मणिपुर विश्वविद्यालय " , के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

डी. ए.

"संवेदनाहरण विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी , जब यह आर. आर. आई. एम. एस. इम्फाल में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में जुलाई, 1999 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो )";

(झ) " पंजाबी विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एम. डी. ( भेषज विज्ञान )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( भेषज विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह गवर्नमेंट मेडिकल कालेज, पटियाला में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में मई, 1963 से अक्तूबर, 1999 के बीच प्रदान की गई हो )";

(ञ ) " राजस्थान विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम (3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

डी. सी. एच.

" बाल स्वास्थ्यमें डिप्लोमा

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह आर. एन. टी. मेडिकल कालेज, उदयपुर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में दिसम्बर, 1981 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)";

एम. डी. (रेडियो- थिरेपी )

"डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (रेडियो- भिरेपी):

(यह एक पान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह एस. पी. मेडियाल कालेज, बीकानेर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1982 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )";

डी. एम. (कार्ड.)

"डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन ( कार्डियोलाजी)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह एस. एम. एस. मेडिकल कालेज, जयपुर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 2001 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )";

डी. एम. (गैस्ट्रो.)

"डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन ( गैस्ट्रोइन्टेरोलाजी)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एस. एस.

2340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)] (2)

(3)

मेडिकल कालेज, जयपुर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में नवम्बर , 2002 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो );

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन ( रेडियोथिरेपी)

एम. डी. ( रेडियोथिरेपी )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह एस. एम. एस. मेडिकल कालेज , जयपुर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1984 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)";

( ट) " रोहतक विश्वविद्यालय", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( भेषज विज्ञान)

एम. डी. ( भेषज विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी , जब यह पं. बी. डी. शर्मा स्नातकोत्तर आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान, रोहतक में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में मार्च, 1977 तथा जुलाई , 1977 के बीच प्रदान की गई हो)";

( ठ ) " शेर- ए - कश्मीर आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान, श्रीनगर ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात्निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( मातृ तथा बाल स्वास्थ्य)

एम . डी. ( एम. सी. एच. )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी , जब यह शेर- ए- कश्मीर आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान, श्रीनगर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1992 से 2000 के बीच प्रदान की गई हो) ;

एम. डी. ( अस्पताल प्रशासन)

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( अस्पताल प्रशासन)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह शेर- ए -कश्मीर आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान, श्रीनगर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1992 से 2000के बीच प्रदान की गई हो )";

[फा. सं. वी. -11015/7/2004- एम.ई. ( नीति-1 ) ]

पी. जी. कलाधरन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 29th April, 2004

S. O. 1183. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956) , the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby, makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, nemely :-

In the said Schedule:-

(a) against " B. N. Chakarvarti University " , under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification ' [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(3)

(2)

"Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology)

M. D. (Pharmacology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted between 1976 and Feb. , 1977 in respect of students trained atPt. B. D. Sharma P.G. Instt. ofMedical Sciences, Rohtak) ";

2341 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(b) against " Calcutta University " , in column (2 ) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ), the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(β)

M. D. (T. B. and Res . Diseases)

"Doctor of Medicine (Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases )

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in orafter 1975 in respect of students trained at Calcutta National Medical College , Calcutta)

M. Ch . (Pead. Surg.)

Magistrar Chirurgiae (Paediatric Surgery)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after August, 1961 in respect of students trained at N. R. S. Medical College, Calcutta)";

(c) against " Ch. Charan Singh University", in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3), the following shall be inserted, namely : ---

(3)

(2)

D. C. H.

"Diploma in ChildHealth

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1976 in respect of students trained at LLRM Medical College,Meerut) " ;

(d) against "Dibrugarh University " , in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely: -

(3)

(2)

M. D. (Com. Med./S.P.M. )

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Community Medicine/Social and Preventive Medicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1997 in respect of students trained at Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh)

M.D. (Microbiology)

Doctor ofMedicine (Microbiology )

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after May, 1992 in respect of students trained at Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh)

M.D. (Derm. )

Doctor ofMedicine (Dermatology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after June, 1995 in respect of students trained at Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh)" ;

(e) against "Himachal Pradesh University", in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column ( 3 ) . the following shall be inserted, namely:

(3)

(2)

M. D. (Microbiology)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Microbiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1988 in respect of students trained at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla)";

2342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SEC , 3 (ii)] (f) against " Kurukshetra University' ' , in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely:

(3)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Pharmacology)

M. D. (Pharmacology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted between 1974 and 1976 in respect of students trained at Pt. B. D. Sharma P. G. Instt . of Medical Sciences , Rohtak) " ;

(g) against "Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak ", column(3) , the following shall be inserted, namely:- in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in

(3)

M. D. (Pharmacology)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Pharmacology)

(This shallbe a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after August 1977 in respect of students trained at Pt. B. D. Sharma P, G. Instt. ofMedical Sciences , Rohtak)" ;

(h) against " Manipur University " , in colunan (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted , namely:

(3)

"Diplom MB : ology

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after July 1999 in respect of students trained at REMS . Imphal) " ;

(1 ) against "Punjabi University ", in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column(3 ), the following shall be inserted, namely :-

(β)

(2)

M. D. (Pharmacology)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Pharmacology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted between May 1963 to Oct. 1999 in respect of students trained at Govt.Medical College, Patiala)" ;

(j ) against Rajasthan University " , in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3) , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(3)

D.CH.

"Diploma in ChildHealth

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after Dec. 1981 in respect of students trained at R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur) " ;

Doctor ofMedicine (Radio- Therapy)

M.D. (Radio -Therapy)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted inor after 1982 in respect of students trained at S.P. Medical Bikaner).

2343 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii)]

(3)

(2)

D.M. (Cand.),

Doctor ofMedicine ( Cardiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted inor after 2001 in respect of students trained at S.M.S. Medical College, Jaipur)

D.M. (Gastro .)

Doctor ofMedicine (Gastroenterology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after November 2002 in respect of students trained at S.M.S. Medical College, Jaipur)

M.D. (Radio-Therapy)

Doctor ofMedicine (Radio-Therapy)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualifications when granted in or after 1984 in respect of students trained at S.M.S. Medical College, Jaipur)";

(k ) against " Rohtak University " , in column (2 ) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(3)

(2)

M.D. (Pharmacology)

"Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology )

(This shall be a recognised medical qualifications when granted betweenMarch 1977 and July, 1977 in respect of students trained atPt. B. D. Sharma P. G. Instt. ofMedical Sciences , Rohtak)" ;

(1 ) against " Sher -I -Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences , Srinagar ' , in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(3)

(2)

M.D. (M.C.H.)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Maternity & ChildHealth)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualifications when granted between 1992 to 2000 in ' respect of students trained at Sher- I -Kashmir Institute ofMedical Sciences , Srinagar)

M.D. (Hosp . Admn. )

Doctor ofMedicine (Hospital Administration)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualifications when granted between 1992 to 2000 in respect of students trained at Sher - I -Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Brinagar)";

[F. No. V- 11015/7/2004-ME(Policy -I )] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 30 अप्रैल, 2004

का. आ. 1184.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में डा. ( श्रीमती ) नंदिता चौधरी, प्राचार्य , असम मेडिकल कालेज , डिब्रूगढ़ को डिब्रूगढ़ विश्वविद्यालय की सभा द्वारा इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से 27-9-2005 तक भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया है ।

उक्त अधिसूचना में, " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अधीन निर्वाचित " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 35 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टि प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी, अर्थात्:-

डिब्रूगढ़ विश्वविद्यालय"

"35. डा. ( श्रीमती) नंदिता चौधरी

प्राचार्य,

असम मेडिकल कालेज,

डिब्रूगढ़।

[संख्या वी-11013/2/2004- एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

पी.जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव 2344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SBC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30thApril, 2004

S.O. 1184.-Whereas in pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -section (1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 (102 of 1956 ) Dr. (Mrs. ) Nandita Choudhury, Principal , Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh has been elected by the Court ofDibrugarh University, to be a member of the Medical Council of India from the date of issue of this Notification upto 27-9-2005.

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 138 , dated the 9th January, 1960 , namely :--

In the said Notification, under the heading, ' Elected under clause (b ) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section3 ' , for serial number 35 and the entry relating thereto the following serial number and entry shall be substituted, namely: - "35 .

Dibrugarh University"

Dr. (Mrs.) Nandita Choudhury, Principal , AssamMedical College,

Dibrugarh

[No. V- 11013/2/2004-ME (Policy- I) ]

P.G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 30 अप्रैल , 2004

का. आ. 1185.-केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एतद्‌द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

उक्तअनुसूची में -

( क) शीर्षक ' मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता ' [ अब के बाद कालम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अधीन " आन्ध्रा विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपाक्षर " [ अब के बाद कालम (3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित के अधीन अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( न्यायिक चिकित्सा)

एम.डी. ( न्यायिक चिकित्सा)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह गुंटूर मेडिकल कालेज , गुंटूर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1978 से पहले प्रदान की गई हो। )

मेजिस्ट्रार चिरूगिएई ( तंत्रिका शल्य चिकित्सा)

एम.सीएच. ( तंत्रिका शल्य चिकित्सा )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता रोगी जब यह आन्ध्रा मेडिकल कालेज , विशाखापटनम में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1987 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई

हो।)";

( ख ) " आन्ध्रा प्रदेश यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ हेल्थ साइन्सेज्, विजयवाड़ा " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टिके बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्-

(2)

(3)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( विकिरण निदान) :

एम.डी. ( विकिरण निदान)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह उस्मानिया मेडिकल कालेज, हैदराबाद में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1990 से फरवरी 1998 तक प्रदान की गई

हो। )" ;

( ग) " अन्नामलाई यूनिवर्सिटी " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

2345

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(3)

(2)

एम.डी. ( फार्माकोलॉजी)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( फार्माकोलॉजी)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह राजा मुथैया मेडिकल कालेज, अन्नामलाइनगर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अगस्त 2001 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । ) " ;

(घ ) " कालीकट विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एम.डी. ( हृदय रोग विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह कालीकट मेडिकल कालेज, कालीकट में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1992 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो।)

एम.डी. (जठरांत्र रोग विज्ञान)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( हृदय रोग विज्ञान ) डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( जठरांत्र रोग विज्ञान )

एम.डी. ( क्षयरोग तथा श्वसनी रोग )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह कालीकट मेडिकल कालेज, कालीकट में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1985 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो। )

डी. टी. सी. डी.

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( क्षयरोग तथा श्वसनी रोग) क्षयरोग तथा वक्ष रोग में डिप्लोमा

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह कालीकट मेडिकल कालेज, कालीकट में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1983 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो। )" ;

(ङ) " केरल विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एम. सीएच. (मूत्र रोग विज्ञान )

" मजिस्ट्रार चिरूगिएई ( मूत्र रोग विज्ञान)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह मेडिकल कालेज, तिरूवनन्तपुरम में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1981 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो। )

एम.डी. ( सूक्ष्मजीव विज्ञान)

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सूक्ष्मजीव विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह मेडिकल कालेज, तिरूवनन्तपुरम में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1981 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गईहो । )";

( च ) " मद्रास विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्: -

(3)

(2)

एम.डी. (सामुदायिक चिकित्सा )

"डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सामुदायिक चिकित्सा )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह क्रिश्चियन मेडिकल कालेज, वैल्लोर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1982 से फरवरी 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो।)";

1496G1/2004-3 2346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] (छ ) " नागार्जुन विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सूक्ष्मजीव विज्ञान )

एम.डी. ( सूक्ष्मजीवविज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह गुन्दूर मेडिकल कालेज, गुन्दूर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1977 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो। ) डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( न्यायिक चिकित्सा)

एम.डी. (न्यायिक चिकित्सा )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह गुन्दूर मेडिकल कालेज , गुन्दूर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1977 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो । ) " ;

(ज) " निजाम्स इंस्टीट्यूट आफॅ मेडिकल साइन्सेज, हैदराबाद " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन

एम.डी.

(क्लिनिकल फार्माकोलाजी एण्ड थेराप्यूटिक्स)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह दिसम्बर, 2000 में और उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो। )

मजिस्ट्रार चिरूगिएई

एम. सीएच. ( प्लास्टिक सर्जरी )

(प्लास्टिक सर्जरी)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह जून , 2000 में और उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

मजिस्ट्रार चिरूगिएई

एम. सीएच. (जेनिटोयूरिनरी सर्जरी )

(जेनिटोयूरिनरी सर्जरी )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह दिसम्बर, 2001 में और उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो।)";

( झ) " एन टी आर यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ हेल्थ साइन्सेज विजयवाड़ा " के सामने कॉलम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कॉलम (3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

"डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन

एम.डी. (विकिरण निदान)

(विकिरण निदान)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह उस्मानिया मेडिकल कालेज, हैदराबाद में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में फरवरी, 1998 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो। )";

( ञ) " यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ उस्मानिया " के सामने कॉलम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कॉलम (3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन

एमडी. (विकिरण निदान)

(विकिरण निदान)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह उस्मानिया मेडिकल कालेज, हैदराबाद में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1975 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो । ) 2347

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(3)

(2)

डी. एम. आर. डी.

चिकित्सा में डिप्लोमा (विकिरण निदान)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह उस्मानिया मेडिकल कालेज, हैदराबाद में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1976 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो । ) (ट) " श्री रामचन्द्र मेडिकल कालेज एण्ड रिसर्च इन्सटीट्यूट, चेन्नई " के सामने कॉलम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कॉलम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टिके बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

डी. एम. ( तंत्रिका विज्ञान)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन

(तंत्रिकाविज्ञान)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह जून 2002 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

डी. डी. डी. बी. एल.

त्वचा विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा त्वचाविज्ञान, रतिरोग विज्ञान और कुष्ठरोग मेंडिप्लोमा

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह जून 2002 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )";

(ठ) " तमिलनाडु डा. एम.जी. आर. मेडिकल यूनिवर्सिटी मद्रास " के सामने कॉलम (2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कॉलम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टिके बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एम.डी. ( सामुदायिक चिकित्सा)

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (सामुदायिक चिकित्सा)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह क्रिश्चियन मेडिकल कालेज, वैल्लोर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में मार्च, 1990 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो।)";

[सं. वी. 11015/10/2003 - एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

पी. जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 30th April , 2004

S.O. 1185. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ), the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India , hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

In the said Schedule

(a) against " Andhra University" , under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification ' [hereinafter referredto as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration ' [hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely

(3)

(2)

M.D. (Forensic Medicine )

"Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine )

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted before 1978 in respect of students trained at Guntur Medical College, Guntur. )

M.Ch. (Neuro-Surgery )

Magistrar Chirugiae (Neuro - Surgery)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from 1987 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Andhra Medical College,Visakhapatnam. ) " ;

2348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] (b) against "Andhra Pradesh University of Health Sciences , Vijaywada " , in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ), the following shall be inserted , namely :-

(2)

(3)

M.D. (Radio -Diagnosis)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Radio-Diagnosis)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from 1990 to February 1998 in respect of students trained at Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad) " ;

(c) against " Annamalai University " , in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3), the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

M.D. (Pharmacology)

"Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after August, 2001 in respect of students trained at Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalainagar)" ;

(d) against " Calicut University " , in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely :-

(2)

(3)

"Doctor of Medicine

D.M. (Cardiology)

(Cardiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1992 in respect of students trained at Calicut Medical College, Calicut)

D.M. (Gastroenterology)

Doctor ofMedicine (Gastroenterology )

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1992 in respect of students trained at Calicut Medical College, Calicut )

M.D. (Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases)

Doctor ofMedicine (Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases )

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1985 in respect of students trained at Calicut Medical College , Calicut)

D.C.T.D.

Diploma in Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1983 in respect of students trained at Calicut Medical College, Calicut ) " ;

(e) against "Kerala University " , in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ), the following shall be inserted, namely :-

(2)

(3)

"Magistrar Chirugiae (Urology)

M.Ch. (Urology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in and after 1981 in respect of students trained at Medical College, Thiruvanathapuram. ) Doctor ofMedicine (Microbiology)

M.D. (Microbiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in and after 1981 in respect of students trained at Medical College , Thiruvanathapuram. ) " ;

2349 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(f) against "Madras University " , in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ), the following shall be inserted , namely:

(3)

(2)

M.D. (CommunityMedicine)

"Doctor of Medicine (CommunityMedicine)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from 1982 to February 1990 in respect of students trained at Christian MedicalCol- lege, Vellore) ." ;

(g ) against " Nagarjuna University " , in column (2 ), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(3)

(2)

M.D. (Microbiology)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Microbiology)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from 1977 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Guntur Medical College, Guntur)

M.D. (Forensic Medicine)

Doctor ofMedicine (Forensic Medicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from 1977 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Guntur Medical College, Guntur) (h) against " Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences , Hyderabad " , in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely:

(3)

(2)

D.M. (Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics)

"Doctor of Medicine

(Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in and after December, 2000)

M.Ch. (Plastic Surgery)

Magistrar Chirurgiae (Plastic Surgery )

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in and after June, 2000)

M.Ch. (Genito- Urinary Surgery)

Magistrar Chirurgiae (Genito-Urinary Surgery)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in and after December, 2001 ) " ;

(i) against " NTR University of Health Sciences , Vijaywada " , in column (2 ) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ), the following shall be inserted, namely :-

(3)

(2)

M.D. (Radio -Diagnosis)

" Doctor of Medicine (Radio -Diagnosis)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after February , 1998 onwards in respect of students trained at Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad)" ;

(j ) against " University of Osmania " , in column (2 ) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ), the following shall be inserted, namely :-

(3)

(2)

M.D. (Radio-Diagnosis)

(Doctor ofMedicine) (Radio -Diagnosis)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from 1975 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad.)

D.M.R.D.

Diploma in Medical (Radio- Diagnosis )

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from 1976 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad).

2350

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

(k) against " Sri Rama Chandra Medical College and Research Institute , Chennai " , in column (2 ) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted , namely :-

(β)

D.M. (Neurology)

(2) "Doctor of Medicine (Neurology)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after June, 2002)

D.D/D.D.V.L.

Diploma in Dermatolgy/Diploma in Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after June, 2002) " ;

(1 ) against " Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Madras '' , in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ), the following shall be inserted, namely :--

(β)

(2) "Doctor ofMedicine (Community Medicine) M.D. ( Community Medicine)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in and after March, 1990 in respect of students trained at Christian Medical College, Vellore)";

[No. V. 11015/ 10/2003 -ME (Policy -1) ] P.G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 30 अप्रैल, 2004

का. आ. 1186.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में डा. प्रबीर कुमार सूर, रेडियोथिरेपी विभाग के प्रोफेसर, कलकत्ता मेडिकल कालेज को कलकत्ता विश्वविद्यालय की सीनेट द्वारा इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया है ।

अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्: - उक्त अधिसूचना में, " धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अधीन निर्वाचित " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 5 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टि प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी, अर्थात्: -

कलकत्ता विश्वविद्यालय"

"5. डा. प्रबीर कुमार सूर रेडियोथिरेपी विभाग के प्रोफेसर, कलकत्ता मेडिकल कालेज , कोलकाता ।

[संख्या वी-11013/2/2004- एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

पी.जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव पाद टिप्पण: मुख्य अधिसूचना भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 9-1-1960 के का.आ. 138 के तहत प्रकाशित की गई थी ।

New Delhi, the 30th April, 2004

S.O. 1186. -Whereas in pursuance of clause (b) of Sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) Dr. Prabir Kumar Sur, Professor in the Deptt . of Radiotherapy, Calcutta Medical College has been elected by the Senate of the Calcutta University to be a member of the Medical Council of India for the period from the date of issue of this notification.

Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of sub -section (1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 138 , dated the 9th January, 1960 , namely :-

In the said Notification, under the heading, ' Elected under clause (b) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ' , for serial number 5 and the entry relating thereto the following serial number and entry shall be substituted , namely :-

2351

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

CalcuttaUniversity"

"5. Dr. Prabir Kumar Sur, Professor in Deptt. of Radiotherapy, Calcutta Medical College , Kolkata

[No. V- 11013/2/2004-ME(Policy-I) ] P.G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

FootNote: ThePrincipal Notification was published in the Gazette of India, vide S.O. 138 dated 9-1-1960 .

नई दिल्ली, 30 अप्रैल, 2004

का. आ. 1187.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क) के अनुसरण में डा. समर देब, शरीर रचना विज्ञान के प्रोफेसर, नार्थ बंगाल मेडिकल कालेज, सिलीगुड़ी को नार्थ बंगाल विश्वविद्यालय की सभा द्वारा इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद के सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया है ।

अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्यमंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्- उक्त अधिसूचना में, " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अधीन निर्वाचित " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 64 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टि प्रतिस्थापित की जाएगी, अर्थात्:-

नार्थ बंगाल विश्वविद्यालय"

समर देब

"64.

शरीर रचना विज्ञान के प्रोफेसर, नार्थ बंगाल मेडिकल कालेज , सिलीगुड़ी ( पश्चिम बंगाल)

[संख्या वी-11013/2/2004- एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

पी.जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव पाद टिप्पण: मुख्य अधिसूचना भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 9-1-1960 के का. आ. 138 के तहत प्रकाशित की गई थी ।

New Delhi , the 30th April , 2004

S.O. 1187 .--Whereas in pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956 ) Dr. Samar Deb , Professor of Anatomy, North Bengal Medical College , Siliguri has been electedby the Court of the North Bengal University to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the date of issue ofthis notification .

Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 138 , dated the 9th January , 1960 , namely :-

In the said Notification, under the heading, ' Elected under clause (b ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ' , for seriál number 64 and the entries relating thereto the following entries shall be substituted , namely:-

North Bengal University"

"64. Dr. Samar Deb , Professor of Anatomy , North Bengal Medical College, Siliguri (West Bengal )

[No. V- 11013/2/2004-ME(Policy-I)] P.G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy .

Foot Note : The Principal Notification was published in the Gazette of India, vide S.O. 138 dated 9-1-1960.

नई दिल्ली , 30 अप्रैल, 2004

का. आ. 1188. - भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में प्रो. एस.के. अग्रवाल , चिकित्सा विभाग , मौलाना आजाद मेडिकल कालेज, नई दिल्ली को दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय की सभा द्वारा इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया है ।

2352

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] उक्त अधिसूचना में, " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अधीन निर्वाचित " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 21 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टि प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी, अर्थात्:-

"21. प्रो. एस. के. अग्रवाल

दिल्लीविश्वविद्यालय"

चिकित्सा विभाग ,

मौलाना आजाद मेडिकल कालेज ,

नई दिल्ली।

[ संख्या वी-11013/2/2004- एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

पी. जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव

> पाद टिप्पण: मुख्य अधिसूचना भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 9-1-1960 के का.आ. 138 के तहत प्रकाशित की गई थी ।

New Delhi, the 30thApril, 2004

2 S.O. 1188. Whereas in pursuance of clause (b) of sub -section (1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) Prof. S.K. Aggarwal, Deptt. of Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, has been electedby the Court ofthe Delhi University to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the date of issue of this notification.

Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 138, dated the 9th January, 1960 , namely :-

In the said Notification, under the heading, ' Elected under clause (b) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ' , for serial number 21 and the entries relating thereto the following entry shall be substituted ; namely:----

"21 .

Delhi University"

Prof. S.K. Aggarwal Department of Medicine, Maulana AzadMedical College, NewDelhi

[No. V- 11013 /2/2004-ME (Policy- I) ]

P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

Foot note : The Principal Notification was published in the Gazette of India, vide S.O. 138 dated 9-1-1960.

नई दिल्ली, 5 मई, 2004

का. आ. 1189. -केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एत‌द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्तअनुसूची में -

(क ) शीर्षक " मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता " [ अब के बाद कालम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अधीन " आन्ध्र विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपाक्षर " [ अब के बाद कालम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित के अधीन अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

(2)

(3)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (पैथोलाजी)

एम.डी. (पैथोलाजी)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता. होगी , जब यह रंगाराय मेडिकल कालेज, काकीनाडामें प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1980 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो । ) क्लिनिकल पैथोलाजी में डिप्लोमा

डी.सी.पी.

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी , जब यह रंगाराय मेडिकल कालेज , काकीनाडामें प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अगस्त, 1973 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो। )"

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन

एम.डी. (एसपीएम)

(सामाजिक एवं निवारक चिकित्सा) 2353

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (it ) ]

(3)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी , जब यह रंगाराय मेडिकल कालेज, काकीनाडा में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1984 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो । )

डी.पी.एच.

जनस्वास्थ्यमें डिप्लोमा

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह रंगाराय मेडिकल कालेज, काकीनाडा में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1983 से 1989 तक प्रदान की गई हो )

एम.डी. ( मनश्चिकित्सीय/मनोवैज्ञानिक चिकित्सा)

डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( मनश्चिकित्सीय/ मनोवैज्ञानिक चिकित्सा)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह आंध्र मेडिकल कालेज , विशाखापट्टनम में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1985 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो ) .

डी.पी.एम.

निवारक चिकित्सा में डिप्लोमा

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह आंध्र मेडिकल कालेज, विशाखापट्टनम में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1979 से 1989 तक प्रदान की गई हो) ";

(ख) " कालीकट विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्मलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्- 1

(3)

(2)

एम.डी. ( नेफ्रोलाजी)

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिलिग ( नेफ्रोलाजी)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी , जब यह कालीकट मेडिकल कालेज,. कालीकट में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1993 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई

हो। )

एम.डी. (मनश्चिकित्सा)

डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( मपरिषफित्ता )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह कालीकट मेडिकल कालेज, कालीकट में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में मार्च , 1986 में अथवा ठसके बाद प्रदान की गईहो। )";

( ग ) " काकतिया विश्वविद्यालय " , के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के चाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एम.डी. (जीव रसायन)

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( जीव रसायन )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह काकतिया मेडिकल कालेज, वारंगल में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1982 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो ) ";

(घ ) " केरल विश्वविद्यालय"," के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में आतम प्रीिर कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एमःडी. ( मनश्चिकित्सा)

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( मनश्चिकित्सा)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्लीम नईता होगी , जब यह मेडिकल कालेज, तिरूवनंतपुरम में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1993 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

एम.एस. (ई.एन.टी. )

मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( अटो- राइनो लैरिगोलाजी )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह मेडिकल कालेज , तिरूवनंतपुरम में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1980 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो। )

एम.डी. (रेडियो- थिरेपी )

डाक्टर आफॅ मेडिसिन (रेडियो- थिरेपी )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी , जब यह मेडिकल कालेज, तिरूवनंतपुरम में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1978 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ) ";

1496 GI/2004-4 2354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SEC. 3(ii)] (ङ) " कुवेम्पू विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" मनोवैज्ञानिक चिकित्सा में डिप्लोमा

डी.पी.एम.

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी , जब ग्रह जे.जे. मेडिकल कालेज , दावनगिरी में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1993 से 1995 तक प्रदान की गई हो)";

( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् ( च ) " मैसूर विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" मजिस्ट्रार चीरूगेई ( जेनिटो - यूरीनरी सर्जरी )

एम.सी.एच. (जेनिटो- यूरीनरी सर्जरी )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह कस्तूरबा मेडिकल कालेज, मणिपाल में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1977 से दिसम्बर, 1981 तक प्रदान की गई हो)

डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( फार्माकोलोजी)

एम.डी. (फार्माकोलोजी )

( एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह जे.एस.एस. मेडिकल कालेज, मैसूर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1993 से अगस्त, 99 तक प्रदान की गईंहो)

डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( कम्यूनिटी मेडिसिन)

एम.डी. (कम्यूनिटी मेडिसिन )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह जे.एस.एस. मेडिकल कालेज, मैसूर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में मार्च, 1997 से अंगस्त, 1999 तक प्रदान की गई हो)";

(छ) " निजाम्स आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान , हैदराबाद " , के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" डाकटर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( वृक्क विज्ञान )

.डी.एम. ( वृक्क विज्ञान)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह निजाम्स आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान में, प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में दिसम्बर, 2002 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो )" ;

(ज) " उस्मानिया विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

"डाकटर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( क्षय रोग एवं छाती के रोग ) एम.डी. ( क्षय रोग एवं छाती के रोग )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह उस्मानिया मेडिकल कालेज, हैदराबाद में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1978 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो)";

(झ) " राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" मनोविज्ञानी मेडिसिन में डिप्लोमा

डी.पी.एम.

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह जे.जे. मेडिकल कालेज, देवनगेरे में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1996 में अथवा उसके बाद और फ्रा मुलर्स मेडिकल कालेज, मंगलौर में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में फरवरी. 1996 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ) ";

2355

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1, 1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

(ञ ) " श्री वेंकटेश्वर विश्वविद्यालय ", के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एम.डी. ( सारण )

'डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( संवेदनाहरण )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होमी, जब यह कुर्नूल मेडिकल कालेज, कुर्मूल में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1979 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो)

एम.डी. ( एस.पी.एम. )

डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सामाजिक एवं निरोधक चिकित्सा )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह कुर्नूल मेडिकल कालेज, कुर्नूल में प्रशिक्षित जत्रों के संबंध में 1985 से 1990 तक प्रदान की गई हो)

डी.पी.एच.

जन स्वास्थ्यमें डिप्लोमा

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी, जब यह कुर्नूल मेडिकल कालेज, कुर्नूल में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1983 से 1989 तक प्रदान की गई हो ) " ।

[सं. वी. 11015/8/2004- एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ] पी.जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi, the 5th May, 2004

S.O. 1189.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) , the Central Government, antr consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the sind Act, namely

In the said Schedule-

(a) against "Andhra University " , under the heading ' Recognised Medical Qualification ' [ hereinafter referred t as column (2) ] , after the last entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely:

(3)

(2)

M.D. (Pology)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1980 to 1990 in respect of stadents trained at Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada) i

D.C

Diploma in Clinical Pathology

be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 973 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Rangaraya MCollege, Kakijada)

M.D. (SPM)

Doctor ofMedicine (Social & Preventive Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1984 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Rangaraya Modical

College,Kakinada)

DPH

Diploma in PublicHealth

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1983 to 1989 in respect of students trained at Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada)

M.D. (Psychiatry/Psychological Medicine)

Doctor ofMedicine

(Psychiatry/Psychological Medicine)

(Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1985 to 1990 in respect ofstudents trained at Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam)

D.P.M.

Diploma in Preventive Medicine

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1979 to 1989 in respect of students trained at Andhra Medic College , Visakhapatnam)";

2356

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

(b) against " Calicut University" , under column 2, after the last entry and entry relating thereto under column 3 , the following shall be inserted namel

(2)

(ε)

(Nephrology)

"Doctor of Medicine (Nephrology )

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted in or after 1993 in respect of students trained at Calicut Medical College, Calicut)

M.D. (Psychiatry)

Doctor ofMedicine (Psychiatry )

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted in or afterMarch, 1986 in respect of students trained at Calicut Medical College, Calicut)";

(c) against " Kakatiya University" , under cob 3 , the following shall be inserted namely:- after the last entry and entry relating thereto under column

(3)

(2)

"Doctor of Medicine (Bio Chemistry)

M.D. (Bio Chemistry)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1982 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Kakatiya Medical College , Warangal)";

(d) against " Kerala University " , under coiume , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under column 3, the following shall be inserted namely:----

(2)

(3)

M.D. (Psychiatry)

"Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted in or after 1993 in respect of students trained at Medical College, The vanathapuram)

M.S. (E.N.T. )

Master of Surgery (Oto -Rhino -Laryngology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted in or after 1980 in respect of students trained at Medical College, Thiruvanithapuram )

Doctor ofMedicine (Radio -therapy)

MD. (Radio-therapy)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted in or after 1978 in respect of students tralned at Medical College, Thiruvanathapuram)" ;

(e) against "Kuvempu University " , under the column 2 , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under column 3 , the following shall be inserted namely:-

(2)

(3)

D.P.M.

"Diploma in Psychological Medicine

(This shall be a recognized médical qualification when granted from 1993 to 1995 in respect of students trained at J.J. Medical College , Davangere)";

(f) against "Mysore University " , under column 2, after the last entry and entry relating thereto under column3 , the following shall be inserted namely:-

(2)

(3)

"Magistrar Chirurgiae ( Genito -Urinary Surgery) M. Ch. (Genito -Urinary Surgery)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1977 to December, 1981 in respect of students trained at Kasturba Medical College, Manipal ) 2357

भारत का राजपत्रराजपत्र मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग - 3 )

(3)

M.D. (Pharmacology)

Doctor ofMedicine (Pharmacology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from 1993 to August, 1999 in respect of students trained at J.S.S. Medical College,Mysore)

M.D. (Community Medicine)

Doctor ofMedicine (Community Medicine)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from March, 1997to August, 1999 in respect of students trained at J.S.S. Medical College, Mysore)";

(8) against " Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences , Hyderabad" under column 2, after the last entry and entry relating therme under column 3, the following shall be inserted namely:-

(3)

D. M. (Nephrology )

"Doctor ofMedicine (Nephrology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted in or after December , 2002 in respect of students trained at Nizam's Institute ofMedical Sciences)";

ainst "Osmania University" , under column 2, after the last entry and entry relating thereto under column 3, the following shall be inserted namely:-

(3)

M.D. (T.B. & ChestDiseases)

(T Medicine is & Chest Diseases)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1978 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Osmania Medical Col- lege , Hyderabad)";

Against " Rajiv Gan Gani University of Health Sciences" , under column 2, after the last entry and entry relating thereto under column 3 , the following shall be inserted namely:-

(3)

D.P.M.

"Diploma in PsychiologicalMedicine

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted in or after 1996 in respect of students trained at J.J. Medical College , Davangere and in or after Feb. , 1996 in respect of students being trained atFr. Muller's Medical College, Mangalore)" ;

(j ) against " Sri Venkataeswara University " , under column 2 , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under column3, the following shall be inserted namely:-

(3)

M.D. (Anaes)

"Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesia)

(Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1979 to 1990 in respect of students trained at Kurnool Medical College , Kurnool)

M.D. (S.P.M. )

Doctor ofMedicine

(Social & Preventive Medicine)

(Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted from 1985 to 1990 in respect of students trained at KurnoolMedical College, Kurnool).

D.P.H

Diploma in Public Health

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted from 1983 to 1989 in respect of students trained at Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool)";

[No. V. 11015/8/2004-ME(Policy-I) ]

P.G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.

2358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मई , 2004

का. आ. 1190.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एतद्‌द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्तअनुसूची में -

(क) शीर्षक " मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता [ अब के बाद कालम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अधीन " भारती विद्यापीठ ", के सामने शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपाक्षर " [ अब के बाद कालम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अधीन अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रशिष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

(2)

(3)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन

एम.डी. (प्रसूति विज्ञान एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान )

(प्रसूतिविज्ञान एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान )

मास्टर आफ सर्जरी ( जनरल सर्जरी )

एम.एस. (जनरल सर्जरी )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह भारती विद्यापीठ मेडिकल कालेज, पत्रकाची सुते " री 2000 में अथक उसके पार प्रदान की गई हो)";

( ख ) '" बम्बई विश्वविद्यालय के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम (3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविधि के प्रारनिस्तान संतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्: -

(2)

(3)

डी. जी. ओ.

" प्रसूतिविज्ञान और स्त्री रोग विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा

( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एल.टी.एम. भडकल कालेज , मुम्बई में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में जनवरी, 1994 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो;।

मजिस्ट्रार चीरुगेई ( कार्डियो वास्कुलर थोरासिक सर्जडी ) एम. सी. एच. (सी.वी.टी.एस. )

(यह एक माम्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एल.टी.एम. मेडिकल कालेज, मुम्बई में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अक्टूबर, 1983 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो;।

एम.डी. (रेडि. रेडियो- डायग्नोसिस)

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (रेडियोलोजी/ रेडियो- डायग्नोसिस )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त अर्हता होगी जब यह सेठ जी. एस. मेडिकल कालेज, मुम्बई में प्रशिक्षित काओं के संबंध में अक्टूबर 1968 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई

हो। )";

(ग ) " डा. बाबा साहेब अम्बेडकर माराठवाड़ा विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

डी.सी.पी.

"डिप्लोमा इन क्लीनीकल" पैथोलोजी

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एस.आर. टी. आर. मेडिकल कालेज, अम्बाजोगाई में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1982 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान

की गई हो । )";

(घ)" गुजरात विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम (2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्: -- 2359

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ पेष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(3)

(2)

डी.सी.एच.

"डिप्लोमा इन चाइल्ड हैल्थ"

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह श्रीमती एन. एच. एल. म्युनिसिपल मेडिकल कालेज, अहमदाबाद में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1984 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

एम.डी. (रेडियो थेरेपी )

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (रेडियो थेरेपी)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह बी.जे. मेडिकल कालेज, अहमदाबाद में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1984 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो।)";

अम्नलिखित

( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के

(ङ) " मराठवाड़ा विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अत:

(3)

(2)

डी.सी.पी

" मा इन क्लीनीकल पैथोलोजी

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एस.टी. आर. मेडिकल कालेज, अम्बाजोगाई में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1982 में अथवा उसके कीगई हो ।) ";

(च) " मुम्बई विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किक जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

(3)

(2)

डी.जी.ओ.

सूति विज्ञान और स्त्री रोग विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकितम अर्हता होगी जब यह पूल, टी. एम. मेडिकल करान मुम्बई में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में जनवरी, 1994 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो। )

एम.सी.एच. ( सी.वी.टी.एस. )

मजिस्ट्रार चीरूगेई ( कार्डियो वास्कुलर थोरासिक सर्जरी )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एल. टी. एम. मेडिकल कालेज, मुम्बई में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अक्टूबर 1983 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गईहो । )

एम.डी. ( रेडि. /रेडियो डायग्नोसिस )

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन ( रेडियोलोजी/ रेडियों डायग्नोसिस )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह सेठ जी. एस. मेडिकल कालेज मुम्बई में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अक्टूबर 1968 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो। ) " ;

(छ) " नागपुर विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(3)

(2)

एम.डी. ( क्षय रोग और छाती के रोग )

" डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन ( क्षय रोग और छाती के रोग )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह गवर्नमेन्ट मेडिकल कालेज, नागपुर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अप्रैल, 1995 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो । ) ";

(ज) " पूना विश्वविद्यालय" के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम (3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

2360.

[PART 11-Sec. 3 (1) ] THEGAZETTEOF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1920

(2)

(3)

" मजिस्ट्रार चीरूगेई ( न्यूरो सर्जरी)

एस.सी.एच. (न्यूरो सर्जरी )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह सशस्त्र सेना मेडिकल कालेज, पुणे में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में जुलाई 1999 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो। )

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन ( बायो-कैमिस्ट्री)

एम. डी. (बायोकैमिस्ट्री)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह सशस्त्र सेना मेडिकल कालेज, पुणे में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में दिसणार 1984 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)" ।

( 3 ) में उससे प्रविबाद निम्नलिखित ( झ) " सरदार पटेल विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

"जन स्वास्थ्यमें

डी.पी.एच.

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह प्रमुखस्वामी मेडिकल कालेज, करमसाड में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अगस्त, 2002 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो) " ।

(ञ ) " सौराष्ट्र विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने कालम ( 2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

'डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन ( फोरेन्सिक मेडिसिन)

एम.डी. (फोरेन्सिक मेडिसन )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एम. पीताई मेडिकल कालेज, जामनगर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में जून, 2001 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो) ।

मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( आटो रिनो लैरिंगोलाजी)

एम.एस. (कान नाक गला)

(यह एक माम्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब यह एम. पी. शाह मेडिकल कालेज, जामनगर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में नवम्बर, 1993 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)"।

( ट ) " शिवाजी विश्वविद्यालय के सामने 'कालम (2 ) में अंतिम प्रविष्टि और कालम ( 3 ) में उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( अस्थिरोग विज्ञान )

एम.एस. (अस्थिरोग विज्ञान )

अस्थिरोग विज्ञान मेंडिप्लोमा

डी. आर्थो

(ये मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब ये कृष्णा आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान, कराड, में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में अक्टूबर, 1993 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ) " ।

[सं. वी. 11015/6/ 2004- एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

पी.जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव 2361

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi, the 5th May, 2004

S.O. 1190.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) , the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby, makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

(a) against "Bharati Vidyapeeth " , under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification' [ hereinafter referredto as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration ' [hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely:---

(β)

(2)

M.D. (Obst. & Gynae .)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Obstetrics & Gynaecology

M.S. (General Surgery)

Master of Surgery (General Surgery)

(These shall be recognised qualifications when granted in or after Febru- ary, 2000, in respect of students trained at Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College,Dhankawadi, Pune)" ;

(b) against "University ofBombay " , in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3), the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(β)

(2)

D.G.O.

"Diploma in Gynaecology and Obstetrics

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after January, 1994 in respect of students trained at L.T.M. Medical College, Mumbai) .

M.Ch. (CVTS)

Magistrar Chirurgiae (Cardio Vascular Thoracic Surgery)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in orafter October, 1983 in respect of students trained at L.T.M. Medical College, Mumbai).

M.D. (Rad./Radio-Diagnosis)

Doctor ofMedicine (Radiology/ Radio-Diagnosis)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after October, 1968 in respect of students trained at Seth G. S. MedicalCollege, Mumbai).";

(c)against"Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University " , in column (2 ), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(3)

D.C.P.

"Diploma in Clinical Pathology

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1982 in respect of students trained at S.R.T.R. Medical College, Ambajogoi )";

(d) against "Gujarat University " , in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ), the following shallbe inserted , namely:-

(3)

(2)

D.CH.

"Diploma in ChildHealth

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1496 GI/2004-5 2362

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

(3)

(2)

1964 in respect of students trained at Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad).

M.D. (Radio-Therapy)

Doctor ofMedicine (Radio -Therapy)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification whengranted in or after October, 1984 in respect of students trained at B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad).'";

(e) against "Marathwada University " , in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column(3 ), the following shall be inserted, namely :-

(2)

(3)

D.CP.

"Diploma in Clinical Pathology

(Thisshall be arecognised medical qualification when granted in or after 1982 in respect of students trained at S.R.T.R. Medical College, Ambajogoi )." ;

(f) against "University of Mumbai " in column (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ),the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(3)

D.G.O.

"Diploma in Gynaecology and Obstetrics

(Thisshall be a recognised inedical qualification when granted in or after January, 1994 in respect of students trained at L.T.M. Medical College , Mumbai).

M.Ch. (CVTS)

Magistrar Chirurgiae (Cardio Vascular Thoracic Surgery)

(Thisshallbe arecognised medical qualification when granted in or after October, 1983 in respect of students trained at L.T.M. Medical College, Mumbai) .

M.D. (Red./Radio-Diagnosis)

Doctor ofMedicine (Radilogy/ Radio-Diagnosis)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after October, 1968 in respect of students trained at SethG. S. Medical College , Mumbai ).";

(g) against " Nagpur University " in coulumn (2 ) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column ( 3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(3)

(2)

Doctor ofMedicine

M.D. (Tuberculosis & Chest Diseases)

(Tuberculosis & Chest Diseases)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after April, 1995 in respect of students trained at Government Medical College, Nagpur).";

(h) against " Poona University ' in coulumn ( 2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely :-

(3)

(2)

M.Ch. (Neuro -Surgery)

"Magistrar Chirurgiae (Neuro-Surgery) 2363

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(3)

(2)

(Thisshallbe a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after July, 1999 inrespect of students trained at Armed ForcesMedical College , Pune).

M.D. (Bio-Chemistry)

Doctor ofMedicine (Bio-Chemistry)

(This shallbe a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after December, 1984 in respect of students trained at Armed Forces Medical College, Pune)." ;

(i) against " Sardar Patel University " in coulumn (2 ), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3), the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(3)

(2)

D.P.H.

"Diploma in Pubilic

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after August, 2002 in respect of students trained at Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad) ." ;

(J) against "Saurashtra University " in coulumn (2), after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3). the following shall be inserted , namely:-

(3)

(2)

M.D. (Forensic Medicine)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Forensic Medicine)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after June, 2001 in respect of students trained at M.P. Shah Medical College , Jamnagar).

M.S. (ENT)

Master of Surgery (Oto - rhino- Laryngology)

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after November, 1993 in respect of students trained at M.P. Shah Medical. College, Jamnagar).";

(k) against " Shivaji University " in column (2) , after the last entry and the entry relating thereto in column (3 ) , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

M.S. (Ortho.)

"Master of Surgery ( Orthopaedics)

D.Ortho.

Diploma in Orthopaedics

(These shall be a recognised qualifications when granted in or after Octo ber, 1993 in respect of students trained at Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences , Karad) " .

[No. V.11015/6/2004-ME(Policy-I) ]

P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

2364

[PART II-SEC, 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2003

का.आ. 1191.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पी. नरेन्द्रास स्केल मैनुफैक्चरिंग कं. , तीसरी रोड, शिवाजी नगर, सावरंकुन्डला , गुजरात-364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित काउंटर मशीन के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पी. नरेन्द्रास स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/389 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।;

उक्त माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. सहित एक काउंटर मशीन है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्रके अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता सहित तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 241 ) / 2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2365

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

MINSISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 28th October , 2003

S.O. 1191. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its acouracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of counter machine with brand name "P.Narendras scale " (herein referred to as the Model) manufactured by M/s . P. Narendras Scale Mfg . Co, 3rd Road, Shivaji Nagar, Savarkundla, Gujarat - 364515 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/389;

5kg. The said Model (see the figure given below) is a counter machine (Mechanical ) with a maximum capacity of Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (12 ) of said section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of came series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g to 50kg manufactured by the same manufacturer win the principle, design, accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactu

[F. No. WM-21

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal M 2366

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल , 2004

का.आ. 1192.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सरटोरियस मेक्ट्रोनिक्स इण्डिया प्रा. लि. , 10 तीसरा फेस , पीन्या, 6वां मेन, कियाडम इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बंगलोर-560058 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " पीएमए " श्रृंखला के अस्वाचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सरटोरियस ' है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन विह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/440 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विद्युत चुम्बकीय बल प्रतिकर सिद्धान्त पर आधारित अस्वचालित का तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 7506.1 ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 100 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल संप्रदर्श ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पूर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को शील बंद करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटा परों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी की जाएगी।

2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त बला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होगें विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता हे जिससे और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धार माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिमर्माता जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिम अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 339 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2367

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 27th April, 2003

S.O. 1192. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with, the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic (table top type) weigh- ing instrument with digital indication of " PMA " series of special accuracy ( accuracy class - I ) and with brand name " SARTORIUS " (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s . Sartorious Mechatronics India Pvt . Ltd. , 10, 3rd Phase, Peenya, 6th Main, KIADB Industrial Area , Banglore - 560 058 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/440;

The said Model is a electromagnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (table top type) with a maximum capacity of 7506. 1g and minimum capacity of 10 g. The verification scale interval (e) is 100mg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The liquid crystal display (LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the Act, the Central Govem- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) 50,000 and above for ' e' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k, 2x 10k or 5x10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (339)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2368

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

नईदिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1193.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सरटोरियस मेक्ट्रोनिक्स इंडिया प्रा . लि. , 10, तीसरा फेस, पीन्या, 6वॉ मेन, किवाडब इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, मंगलौर -560058 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग-1 ) वाले " जी पी 3202 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सरटोरियस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/439 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विद्युत् चुम्बकीय बल प्रतिकर सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित का तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3200.61 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तरोल (ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति हैजिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल संप्रदर्श ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट कोसीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बंदी की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 x10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें ' के' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 339 ) /2002]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2369

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (it) ]

New Delhi, the 27th April, 2004

S.O. 1193. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GP 3202 " series of special accuracy (accuracy class - I) and with brand name " SARTORIUS" (herein referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/s . Sartorious Mechatronics India Pvt. Ltd., 10, 3rd Phase, Peenya, 6th Main KIADB Industrial Area, Bangalore - 560058 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/439;

The said Model is a electromagnetic force compensation principle based non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 3200.61g and minimum capacity of 1g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal display (LCD) indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, the sealing shall above done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale inter- val (n ) 50,000 and above for ' e ' value of 1mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same prin- ciple, design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 339)/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 1496GI/2004-6 2370

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii)] THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

नईदिल्ली , 27 अप्रैल , 2004

का.आ. 1194.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सरटोरियस मेक्ट्रोनिक्स इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 10, तीसरा फेस, पीन्या, 6वॉ मेन , कियाडब इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बंगलौर -560058 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) वाले " जी, एम 1202 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सरटोरियस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/438 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विद्युत् चुम्बकीय बल प्रतिकर सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित का तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1200.61. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल सप्रदर्श ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बंदी की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10* है जिसमें ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्यहै ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 339)/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2371

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

New Delhi, the 27th April, 2004

S.O. 1194.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GM 1202" series of special accuracy (accuracy class - I) and with brand name " SARTORIUS " (herein referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/s . Sartorious Mechatronics India Pvt. Ltd. , 10, 3rd Phase, Peenya, 6th Main KIADB Industrial Area, Bangalore-560 058 and which is assigned the approval mark, IND/09/2003/438;

The saidModel is a electromagnetic force compensation principle based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 1200.61g and minimum capacity 1g. The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The liquid crystal display (LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply;

Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulentpractices.

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub -section (12) of Section 36, of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale inter- val (n) 50,000 and above for ' e' value of Img or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10%, 2× 10 or 5× 10%, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same prin- ciple, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (3 : '2002]

ology

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal 2372

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3(il)]

नई दिल्ली , 27 अप्रैल , 2004

का०आ० 1195.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सरटोरियस मेक्ट्रोनिक्स इंडिया प्रा ० लि० , 10 , तीसरा फेस , पीन्या, 6वों मेम , कियाडब इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बंगलौर -560058 . द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -2 ) वाले " जी एम 312 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सरटोरियस" है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09/ 2003/437 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विद्युत् चुम्बकीय बल प्रतिकर सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित का तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 310.61 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 10 मि० ग्रा० है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल संप्रदर्श ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

है। स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बंदी की जाती और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि०ग्रा० तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि ०ग्रा० या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा०सं० डब्ल्यू० एम० 21 (339 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2373

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 27th April , 2004

S.O. 1195. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GM 312 " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " SARTORIUS " (herein referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/s. Sartorious Mechatronics India Pvt . Ltd. , 10, 3rd Phase, Peenya, 6th Main KIADB Industrial Area, Banglore -560-058 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/437;

The said Model is a electromagnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 310.61g and minimum capacity 200 mg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The liquid crystal display (LCD) indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of section 36, of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (339)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल, 2004

का०आ० 1196.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स हिवा दिगी वेजिंग सिस्टम्स, सं ० 1476, 17वां, मेन भुनेश्वर ब्लाक बेंगलौर -560026 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग -2 ) वाले " एच जे -01 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " हिवा" (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2003 /431 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचालिता का तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा० और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि० ग्रा० है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि० ग्रा ० है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त , मुद्रांकत कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारी से मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जी 1 मि० ग्रा० या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि ० ग्रा० तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 ×10 या 5 × 10* के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा ०सं० डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (300)/2002 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2375

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th April , 2004

S.O. 1196.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "HJ-01 " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II) and with brand name "HIWA" (herein referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/s . Hiwa Digi Weighing System, No. 1476 , 17th MainMuneswara Block, Banglore - 560 026 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/431 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 g and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, the sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also coven the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of Img or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10%, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (300)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22 , 2004 /JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)]

नईदिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1197.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स हिवा दिगी वेजिंग सिस्टम्स, सं. 1476 , 17वां, मेन मुनेश्वर ब्लाक बेंगलौर -560026 कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) वाले " एच'जे -03 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " हिवा" ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /432 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

HIMA DIG

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल पर उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तौलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त, मुद्रांकन कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडलके अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10. या 5 × 1.0 के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 300 ) /2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2377

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ1, 1926

[ भाग II- खष्ठ 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th April, 2004

S.O. 1197. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "HJ-03 " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III ) and with brand name "HIWA" (herein referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/s Hiwa Digi Weighing System, No. 1476, 17th MainMuneswara Block, Bangalore -560 026, Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003 /432;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is Sg. It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36, of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale inter- val (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10%, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (300)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1496G1/2004-7 2378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC, 3 (ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल , 2004

का.आ. 1198.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60.) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स हिवा दिगी वेजिंग सिस्टम्स, सं . 1476 , 17 वां, मेन मुनेश्वर ब्लाक बेंगलौर -560026 कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) वाले " एच आई -06 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " हिवा " ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/433 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचालित उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त, मुद्रांकन कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए युद्ध घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन केकार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक केके " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से अधिक 1000 किग्रा तक की अधिकम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समुहत्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम . 21 ( 300 )/2002 ]

पी. ए.. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926.

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th April , 2004

S.O. 1198. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approvatofinossaApproval ofron aptomatic (Platfo ing instrument with digital indication of " HI -06 " series of medium dou "HIWA" (herein referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/ s Hiwa Digi Weighing System: No. 1476 , 17th Ma Muneswara Block, Bangalore -560 026, Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2003/433 ;

The said Model is a strain gange type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

10 Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approyin of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up . 1000ké with verification scale interval (ny in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with 2× 10 or 5x10s bong a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by inaccordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured. Saintiacturer

[F: No. WM-21 (300 )/ 2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2380

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल , 2004

का.आ. 1199.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदक्ष शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मारूति इलेक्ट्रानिक्स, 1 , परियार रोड, दूसरा तल, टी- नगर, चेन्नई-600017 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( वथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) वाले " एम ई-पी टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण (प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के तोलन उपकरण का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डी स्केल " ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/515 सममुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी. और प्रकाशित करती है ।

Platform

ر उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचालित उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यंवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलं किया गया है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडलके अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और

* के है, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं । -

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 76 )/2003 ] 2381

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ण्वेष्ठ 1, 1926

A [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) 1

New Delhi , the 28th April, 2004

S.O. 1199. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non -automatic (Platform type) weigh- ing instrument with digital indication of "ME-PT " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III) and with brand name "dSCALE" (herein referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/s Maruthi Electronics , 1, Periyar Road, find Floor, T. Nagar, Chennai -600 017 , and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2003/515;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity is 500 kg and minimum capacity 1 kg. The verification scale interval (c) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

'nle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has 2382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] .

नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल , 2004

का.आ. 1200.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्तं मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( ४ ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टीटीसी वेइंग सिस्टम्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, 33/1 एन एस रोड ( कक्ष सं. - 807 ) कोलकाता द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) वाले " पीएम -2736 ई" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( तुला चौकी के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एटलस " ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/2003 /367 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक ( तुला चौकी के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आंधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यषकलानात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हट्रर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विर्निमाण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 किं.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या संहित 5 टन से 100 टन के रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 जिसमें के जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 43 ) /98 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2383 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 28th April , 2004

S.O. 1200.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating, non-automatic (conversion kit for Weigh bridge type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " PM - 2736 E " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " ATLAS" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model) manufactured by M/s . TTC Weighing Systems Private Limited, 33/1 N.S. Road, (Room No. 807) Kolkata-700 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2003/367 ;

The said Model (see the figure given below) is a (conversion kit for weighbridge ) weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30 tonnes and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale internal (e) is 5 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing : In addition to sealing stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the other weighing instruments of the same accuracy class and of same make with maximum capacity ranging from 5 tonne to 100 tonnes and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg . or more and with ' e' value 1x 10% , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the. same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said. approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (43)/98 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

नईदिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल , 2004

का.आ. 1201.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जानसंस पेटेन्ट स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, बी-16/7, झिलमिल इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया, जीटी रोड, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110095 द्वारा विनिर्मित गणक मशीन के मॉडल का ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " जानसन्स एण्ड जे पी एस आई" और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/508 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) गणक मशीन है । इसको अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा हसी सिद्धान्य, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि. ग्रा.तक की रेंज में है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 17 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2385 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

New Delhi, the 28th April, 2004

S.O. 1201.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

८

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of counter machine (herein referred to as the said Model) with brand name ' Janson's & JPSI ' manufactured by M/s . Jamson's Patent Scale Indus- tries , B - 16/7 , Jhilmil Industrial Area, G.T. Road, Shahdara, Delhi - 110095 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/508;

The said Model (see the figure given below) is" counter machine " . The maximum capacity is 20 kg .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36, of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g.to 50 kg . manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 17)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1496G1/20048 2386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 11 मई , 2004

का.आ. 1202.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डी. जी. एग्रो इंडस्ट्रियल कारपोरेशन, जी. टी. रोड, बटाला , जिला गुरदासपुर, पंर्जाब द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) वाले " पी एफ एस 555 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रतिभार प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डी जी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003 /497 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल यांत्रिक स्टीलयार्ड प्रकार लीवर अस्वचालित भार उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन प्रतिभार प्रकार ) जिसको अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और 2 ग्रा. न्यूनतम क्षमता वाला है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबंद करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडलके अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिज़ाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) 50 कि.ग्रा. से 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक हैं और " ई" मान 1. × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (44 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2387 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 11th May , 2004

S.O. 1202.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic (Plateform machine- Pro Weight type) weighing instrument with analogue indication of " PFS -555 series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " DEE GEE " ( herein referred to as the said Model) manufacturedby M/s . D. G.Agro Industrial Corp. G. T. Road, Batala, District -Gurdaspur, Punjab and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/497;

The said Model is a mechanical steelyard type liver based non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform machine-Pro Weight type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100 g.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of app Heard model shall also cover the weighing instru- nents of similar m mmune capacity above 50 kg . and upto fortel value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 18 10 , 2810 ors 10 , Krong a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (44)/2003]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 11 मई , 2004

का.आ. 1203.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एक्सकोन इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स, प्लाट सं. 87, अनुपुरम कम्यूनिटी हाल के बराबर मिला हुआ, राधिका थियेटर के निकट, ई सी आई एल पोस्ट, हैदराबाद- 500062 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ई एक्स आई- पी जे " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एक्सकोन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/ 512 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 25 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 0.5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आघेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुद्रांकन भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विर्निमित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अन्तराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10% या 5 × 10 के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 89 ) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2389

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 11th May, 2004

S.O. 1203. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its, accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EXI -PJ" series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " EXCON " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/s. Excon Instruments, Plot No. 87, Adj . Anupuram Community Hall , Near Radhika Theatre , ECIL Post, Hyderabad - 500062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/512;

The said Model is a starin gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 6 kg . and minimum capacity of 25 g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 0.5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect. The light emiting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50 Hz . alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12) of Section 36, of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . with of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg. and verification scale interval in the range of5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , desigri and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 89)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 2390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 मई, 2004

का.आ. 1204.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एक्सकोन इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स, प्लाट सं. 87, अनुपुरम कम्यूनिटी हाल के बराबर मिला हुआ, राधिका थियेटर के निकट, ई सी आई एल पोस्ट हैदराबाद-500062 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ई एक्स आई- टी बी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोनल उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्सकोन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/ 513 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है। उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुद्रांकन भी किया जाएगा और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसीं श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से122 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 x 10 , 2 x 10 या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनातमक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुलय हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 89) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कष्णामर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2391

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 11th May, 2004

S.O. 1204. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EXI - TB " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III ) and with brand name "EXCON " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Excon Instruments , Plot No. 87 , Adi Anupuram Community Hall , Near Radhika Theatre , ECIL Post, Hyderabad - 500062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/513;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weigh- ing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2 x10 or 5x10t, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 89)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metroslogy 2392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 11 मई, 2004

का.आ. 1205.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

* अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एक्सकोन इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स, प्लाट सं. 87 , अनुपुरम कम्यूनिटी हाल के बराबर मिला हुआ, राधिका थियेटर के निकट, ई सी आई एल पोस्ट हैदराबाद-500 062 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ई एक्स आई पी टी एच " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्सकोन " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 / 514 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुद्रांकन भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 50 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 1000 कि. ग्रा तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 ×10 , 2 ×10 * या 5 × 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 89 )/2003] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2393

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

New Delhi , the 11th May, 2004

S.O. 1205. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non -automatic (Plateform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "EXI - PTH" series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "EXCON" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Excon Instruments , Plot No. 87, Adj . Anupuram Community Hall , Near Radhika Theatre, ECIL Post , Hyderabad -500 062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/514;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy, and performance of same series with maximum in the range of 50 kg. to 1,000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 50g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1× 10k, 2 x10 or 5× 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (89 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1-496 GI/2004-9 2394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JY AISTHA 1, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नईदिल्ली, 14 मई , 2004

का.आ. 1206.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम 1988 के उप विनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद् द्वारा स्वीकृत किए गए लाइसेंसों, जिनके विवरण अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, को अधिसूचित करता है :-

लाइसेंस सं.

मानक का शीर्षक

लागूतिथि पार्टी का नाम और पता (फैक्टरी )

आइ एस भाग वर्ष 1

7 8509785

3055

1994 01-10-02

चिकित्सा धर्मामीटर भाग 1 : ठोस डण्डी टाइप

मैसर्ज़ मेडिकेयर प्रोडक्ट्स इंक बी-30, शारदा पुरी , नईदिल्ली-110015

8509886

30-09-02

2396

1988

फ्यूल के डिसपेन्सन के लिए रबड़ के होज

मैसर्ज पदमिनी इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , गाँव देमदाहेरा , डाकघर खेकड़ा, बागपत ( उ.प्र. )

04-10-02

8509987

3055

1994

चिकित्सा थर्मामीटर भाग 1 .: ठोस डण्डी टाइप

मैसर्जजी.एस. एंड कम्पनी, 128-सी, रेस कोर्स, देहरादून ( उत्तरांचल)

8510063

1417

1999 07-10-02 मैसर्जु पदमिनी आभूषण भण्डार, गोल प्याऊ के पास, नया बाजार, अजमेर ( राजस्थान )

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

8510164

07-10-02

302

2खंड3 1992 मैसर्जु पर्ल एप्लायंसेज प्रा.लि. , ए-84 , जी.टी. करनाल रोड, इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया, नईदिल्ली-110033

घरेलू और सामान बिजली के साधित्रों की सुरक्षा: भाग 2 विशेष अपेक्षाएँ खंड 3 बिजली की इस्तरी

8510265

08-10-02

1741

1960

लैटेक्स फॉम के रबड़ के उत्पाद

मैसर्ज सपना रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज, एच-1-1212 सी, फेज V, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, भिवाडी जिला अलवर ( राजस्थान )

8510366

03-10-02

2062

1999

सामान्य संरचना प्रयोजनों के लिए इस्पात

मैसर्ज गणपति इंडस्ट्रियल प्रा. लि... प्लाट नं. 65 एवं 66 , सैक्टर सी, उर्ला इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

8510467

08-10-02

8931

1993 मैसं धवन सेनिटरी उद्योग, टी-29/एन-4, जनता पार्क , बलजीत नगर, नई दिल्ली-110008

जल कार्यों के लिए तांबा मिश्र धातु की सजावटी एकल टोंटियां संयोजित टोंटी एसेंबली और स्टॉप वाल्व

8510568

07-10-02

13779

1999

ए सी स्थैतिक वाट ऑवर मीटर. श्रेणी 1 और श्रेणी 2

मैसर्ज हैवल्स इंडिया लि. 6 तिलक नगर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, नईदिल्ली-110018

8510669

07-10-02

7809 3खंड 11986 मॅसर्जु जैनटैक्स इंडस्ट्रीज, 30/47, स्ट्रीट नं . 9. विश्वास नगर, शाहदरा, दिल्ली-110032

विद्युत प्रयोजनों के लिए दाव संवेदी आसंजी रोधन टेप भाग 3 पृथक् पृथक् सामग्री की अपेक्षाएँ खंड 1 : गैर ताप स्थायी आसंजी सहित प्लास्टीकृत पोलीक्लोराइड टेप [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8510770

04-10-02 मैस पी.एम. इंडस्ट्रीज, 40, राजिन्द्र नगर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, मोहन नगर, गाजियाबाद (उ.प्र. ) 8510871 04-10-02 मैसर्जु भंसाली केबल्स एंड कंडक्टर्स प्रा.लि., बी-816, रीको इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जिला भिवाडी ( राजस्थान) 04-10-02

8510972

मैसर्ज भंसाली केबल्स एंड कंडक्टर्स प्रा.लि., बी-816 , रीको इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, भिवाडी, जिला अलवर ( राजस्थान) 8511065

09-10-02 मैसर्जजे के होम एप्लायंसेज, 27/96/2, दूसरा तल, ज्वाला नगर, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110032 8511166

09-10-02 मैसर्ज वर्धमान होजेज प्रा. लि. , ई 1249 , फेज 1 , ( घाटल ) , रीको इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, भिवाडी, जिला अलवर ( राजस्थान ) 8511267

10-10-02 मैसर्जुपारिख केबल्स, 340-ए/4, गली नं. 1 ए, फ्रेंड्स कालोनी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110032 10-10-02

8511368

मैसर्ज श्री गीतांजलि लैम्पस प्रा.लि. , प्लॉट नं. 11 /ए, इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स काम्प्लैक्स, परदेशीपुरा, इन्दौर-452010 8511469

16-10-02 मैसर्ज गर्ग इस्पात उद्योग लि. , जी-459-62 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, भिवाडी, जिला अलवर ( राजस्थान) 8511570

17-10-02 मैसर्ज पायनीर प्लास्टिक इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , ए-130, ओखला इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेज II , नई दिल्ली-110020 8511671

16-10-02 मैस किर्लोस्कर ब्रॉदर्स लि. , रेलवे स्टेशन के सामने,

देवास (म.प्र. )

8511772 17-10-02 मैसर्ज बोनी केयर प्रा. लि. , ई-27, एस.एम.ए. , सहकारी औद्योगिक इस्टेट, जी.टी. करनाल रोड, दिल्ली-110033

2395

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926.

2347

1995 घरेलूप्रेशर कूकर

694

1988 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधी केवल

1988

1554

1 पी वीसी रोधी ( भारी कार्य ) बिजली की केवल: भाग 1 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टताके लिये

1992

4246

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैसों के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू गैस के चूल्हे

446

1987 हवा के रबड़ के होज

1990

694

बोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी लिए पी वी सी रोधी

1978

418

टंगस्टन तंतु के सामान्य सेवा बिजली के लैम्प

4270

2001 जल के कुँओं के लिए प्रयुक्त इस्पात की नलिकाएँ

1992

13487

सिंचाई उपस्कर- उत्सर्जक

1996

325

तीन फेज इंडक्शन मोटर

14625

1999 प्लास्टिक की प्रभरण बोतलें [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 2396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

303

1989

सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए प्लाईवुड

8511873

16-10-02 मैस डी. के. प्लाईवुड लि. , जी-1/415-416 , इंडस्ट्रिीयल एरिया , भिवाडी-301019 जिला-अलवर ( राजस्थान)

1999

1417

3-10-02

8511974

मैस झेलम ज्वैलर्स, 2652, बैंक स्ट्रीट, करौल बाग , नईदिल्ली-110005

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

8749

1988

बायो गैस स्टोव

18-10-02

8512067

मैसर्ज मल्होत्रा इंजीनियरिंग कं. प्रा. लि. , 572बी, गली भूतों वाली, नांगलोई, दिल्ली-110049

1995

3564

18-10-02

8512168

द्रव चालान द्वारा नियमित डोर क्लोजर

मैसर्ज केवदिया मैकेनिकल वर्क्स ( रजि. ) ए-1/ए-2, डी.एस.एफ.डी.सी. काम्पलैक्स, शनि बाजार रोड, सुल्तानपुरी, दिल्ली-110041

1978

8960

21-10-02

8512269

मिथाइल पैराथियन बुरकने का पावडर

मैसर्ज एशियन एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज, ए-129( एम ) , रोड नं. १सी, विश्वकर्मा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जयपुर-302013

1 1986

7620

18-10-02

8512370

नैदानिक चिकित्सा एक्स-किरण उपस्कर- भाग 1 : सामान्य और सुरक्षा अपेक्षाएँ

मैसर्जमैडफोर्ड मैडिकल सिस्टम्स प्रा.लि., जी 1-50 , रीको इंडस्ट्रि रोड नं. 2 - सी, बिन्दायक जयपुर-302013

1659

1990

ब्लाक बोर्ड

8512471

22/10/02 मैस भारत वुड क्राफ्टस, खसरा नं. 16/13, मिन ( 1-05 ) 16/14 मिन (0-09 ) , खसरा नं. 16/13, मिन (1-13 ) , शाहबाद दौलतपुर, दिल्ली-110042

1990

694

22/10/02

8512572

1100 यो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैसर्ज राठी पोलीमर्स प्रा.लि., 458/466, गली नं. 8, फ्रेंड्स कालोनी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जी. टी. रोड़, शाहदरा, दिल्ली-110095

1417

1999 22/10/02

8512673

मैसर्जविजय कुमार ज्वैलर्स, 2817 , अजमल खान रोड, करौल बाग , नई दिल्ली-110005

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

694

1990 21/10/02

8512774

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैसर्जमोग्रा केबल्स एंड कंडक्टर्स, नं. 10 , डीएसआईडीसी कॉम्पलैक्स, झिलमिल इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया. शहदरा , दिल्ली-110095

1990

694

22/10/02

8512875

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैसर्जु पूजा इंडस्ट्रीज, 380/4 - ए, फ्रेंड्स कालोनी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, गली नं. 1 - बी, जी.टी. रोड, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110095 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2397

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

8512976

24/10/02 मैस भारत वुडक्राफ्ट्स खसरा नं. 16/13 , मिन ( 1-05) 16/14मिन (0-09 ) , खसरा नं. 16/13 , मिन ( 1-13 ) , शाहबाद दौलतपुर दिल्ली-110042

24/10/02

8513069

मैसर्ज प्रिन्स डायमण्ड ज्वैलर्स 4, पार्क एंड, विकास मार्ग, दिल्ली-110092

25/10/02

8513170

मैसर्जविजयपाल इंडस्ट्रीज, डब्ल्यूजैड 1 बी/9 , न्यूसाहिब पुरा, एम बी एस नगर, तिलक नगर, नई दिल्ली 110018

28/10/02

8513271

मैस गणपति प्लाईवुड, बी-95 (जी ) , रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सीकर-332001 ( राजस्थान ) शास्त्री नगर, जयपुर

8513372

28/10/02 मैस गुप्ता रिफ्रेक्टरीज, 11, महाराजपुरा , ग्वालियर-474005

28/10/02

8513473

मैसर्ज गुप्ता रिफ्रेक्टरीज, 11 , महाराजपुरा, ग्वालियर-474005 8513574

28/10/02 मैस शक्तिउद्योग , 100/28, गांव रजापुर, रोहिणी, सेक्टर 9 , दिल्ली-110085

8513675

30/10/02 मैस आदर्श केबल इंडस्ट्रीज, डब्ल्यूजेड-3 , डी एल एफ औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, बसई दारापुर रोड, मोती नगर, नई दिल्ली -110015

8513776

30/10/02 मैस केविन मर्डिया केब इंडस्ट्रीज, 317, एफ.आई.ई. पटपड़गंज, दिल्ली-110092

8513877

30/10/02 मैसंसीवेज इंडस्ट्रीज , खसरा नं. 665 , नवादा गांव, उत्तम नगर, नई दिल्ली-110059 8513978

30/10/02 मैस डी. के. प्लाईवुड ( प्रा ) लि. , जी-1/415-416 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भिवाडी-301019 जिला- अलवर ( राजस्थान)

303

1989 सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए प्लाईवुड

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

9301

1990 गहराई से पानी निकालने के हैण्ड पम्प

1989

303

सामान्य प्रयोजनों की प्लाईवुड

5531

1988 जल, गैस और सीवेज के लिए ऐस्बेस्टॉस सीमेंट के दाब पाइप के ढलवां लोहे के स्पेशियल्स

1538

1993 जल, गैस और सीवेज के लिए दाब पाइपों की ढलवां लोहे की फिटिंग

7809 3 खंड 1 1986 विद्युत प्रयोजनों के लिए दाब संवेदी आसंजक रोधी टेप भाग 3 अलग- अलग सामग्री की अपेक्षाएँ खंड 1 गैर ताप स्थायी आसंजन सहित प्लास्टीकृत पोलीविनाइल क्लोराइड टेप

2465

1984 मोटर वाहनों के लिए केबल .

1990

694

1100 वो. तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी बी सी रोधी केबल

1994

7466

प्रेशर कुकर के लिये रबड़ के गेस्केंट

1 1999

2202

लकड़ीके सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर टाइप ) : भाग 1 प्लाईवुड के सतहयुक्त पल्ले [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA I , 1926

2398

1999

5557

30/10/02

8514071

औद्योगिक और सुरक्षा के लिए घुटनों तक रबड़ के बूट

मैसर्ज नमन रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट नं. 106 डी, सेक्टर बी, औद्योगिक इस्टेट, सिरगिती, बिलासपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

1990

1659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

8514172

30/10/02 मैसर्जजे.वी.एम. प्लाईवुड प्रा.लि. , ई-42ए, एफ-88 (ए ) एवं एफ-88 ( बी ) , रीको इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बाघरू ( विस्तार ) जयपुर

1999

1417

30/10/02

8514273

मैसर्जुडायमण्ड वर्ल्ड 417, भेरा इंक्लेव , पश्चिम विहार, नईदिल्ली-110087

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1995

2347

30/10/02

8514374

घरेलूप्रेशर कुकर

मैस कंसल मेटल इंडस्ट्रीज, खसरा नं. 299 , गली नं. 26, अथोरिटी रोड के सामने , गाँव गोकलपुर, दिल्ली 110094

1995

2347

8514475

30/10/02

घरेलूप्रेशर कुकर

मैस पाल मेटल वर्क्स, गाँव ताहिरपुर, ए-56 , जी.टी.बी. अस्पताल के पास, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110095

14543

1998 31/10/02

8514576

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा )

मैस सेफप्रोडक्ट्स सेफ इंक्लेव, खमारदिस, शंकर नगर, कछाना रोड, डाकघर सद्बु, रायपुर (म.प्र. )

1061

1997 31/10/02

8514677

रोगाणुनाशी द्रव, फिनोलिक टाइप

मैसर्ज एस. आर. फार्मास्यूटिकल्स श्री राम निकुन्ज, स्टेशन रोड़, मिडु बाडा, शाहडोल-484001 (म.प्र. )

1997

3854

31/10/02

8514778

घरेलूऔर समान प्रयोजनों के लियेस्विच

मैसर्जु नैशनल इलैक्ट्रिकल्स इंडिया, 4009 , गली अहिरन बहादुरगढ़ , रोड दिल्ली-110006

1988

1293

8514879

31/10/02

250 वोल्ट तक और 16 एम्पीयर तक के रेटित करंट के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेट

मैसर्ज नैशनल इलैक्ट्रिकल्स इंडिया , 4009 , गली अहिरन , बहादुरगढ़ रोड, दिल्ली-110006

1990

1659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

31/10/02

8514980

मैस डी. के. प्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. , जी-1/415-416, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, भिवाडी-301019 जिला-अलवर

1989

303

8515073

31/10/02

सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए प्लाईवुड

मैसर्जुजे वी एम प्लाईवुड ई-42 ( ए) , एफ-88 ( ए) , एफ-88 ( बी) , रीको इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बागरू एक्सटेंशन जयपुर, जयपुर 2399

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8515174

31/10/02 मैस मोनार्क सर्जिकल इंडस्ट्रीज, 62, डी एस आई डी सी, ओखला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, स्कीम- I , फेज II , नईदिल्ली -110020 05/11/02

8515275

मैसर्जु मोहन जूट मिल्स लि. , सारनगढ़ रोड, रायगढ़ (छत्तीसगढ़ ) 8515376

05/11/02 मैसर्जु एच पी एल प्रोटेक्शन टेक्नोलोजीज प्रा.लि. एफ 90/26 , ओखला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज- I, जुई दिल्ली-110020 8515477

07/11/02 मैस ए.एम.एक्स. मेडिकल सिस्टम , प्लाट नं. 74 , खसरा नं. 19, गांव महिउद्दीन पुर, मैनपुर परगना, जलालाबाद, जिला- गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

08/11/02

8515578

मैस जे के जे एंड संस ज्वैलर्स, (जे के जे एंड संस इंडीवर प्रा. लि. की इंकाई ) 2719 , बैंक स्ट्रीट, करोल बाग , नई दिल्ली-110005 8515679

08/11/02 मैस रूंगटा इरिगेशन लि. , सी-165 , बी.एस. रोड, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. ) 8515780

08/11/02 मैसर्ज पूजा श्री, 198 , हम्माल नगर, इंदौर-452007 ( म.प्र. ) 11/11/02

8515881 .

मैसर्जु छाबड़ा केबल इंडस्ट्रीज, 473, (बेसमेंट) , एफ.आई.ई. पटपड़गंज औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, दिल्ली-110092

7 4

7080

3 1992 एम टी पी अवचूषण उपकरण: भाग 3 विद्युतचालित

12650

1997 वस्त्रादि-50 कि.ग्रा. खाद्यान्नों की पैकिंग के पटसन के बोरे

1996

8828

बिजली के सहायकांग- घरेलू और समान संस्थापनों के लिये अतिकरंट संरक्षण के परिपथ ब्रेकर

7620

1 1986 नैदानिक चिसा एक्स- किरण उपस्कर भाग 1 : सामान्य और सुरक्षाअपेक्षाएँ

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1992

12818

बोर/ट्यूबवेल के लिये गैरप्लास्टिकृप्त पी वी स्क्रीन और केसिंग पाइप

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा )

1990

694-

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

1990

1659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

8515987

11/11/02 मैसर्जु अम्बा इंडस्ट्रीज, सी-156 , बुलंदशहर रोड, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. ) 11/11/02

8516075

मैसर्ज हरनाम सिंह बिशन सिंह ज्वैलर्स ( प्रा ) लि. 1334-35 , चांदनी चौक, दिल्ली -110006 12/11/02

8516176

मैस महामाया ज्वैलर्स, 2295, हरध्यान सिंह रोड, करोल बाग , नई दिल्ली-110005

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहराकन 2400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 1

7 8516277

07/11/02

4985

2000

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिये गैर प्लास्टिकृत पी वी सी पाइप

मैस वर्धमान पेट्रोकेम प्रा. लि. , 6 कि. मी. स्टोन, देहरादून- सहारनपुर रोड, गांव-कुम्हारहेरा , सहारनपुर (उत्तर प्रदेश)

8516378

14/11/02

14953

2001

वस्त्रादि- पॉलिइस्टर अथवा पॉलिमाइड मच्छरदानियाँ

मैस बॉयोटेक इंटरनेशनल लि. , ए-30, सेक्टर 8 , नोएडा, गौतम बुद्धनगर ( उ.प्र. ) पिन-201301

8516479

14/11/02

14543

1998

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

मैस कॉर्नफील्ड ऐडिकेम ( प्रा) लि. , 30ए, के-2 ब्लॉक, निहाल विहार, नांगलोई, दिल्ली-110041

8516580

14/11/02

779

1994

पानी के मीटर ( घरेस लाइभ ).

मैसर्ज सौरभ इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स, टी 29/1 , बलजीत नगर, रोड नं. 20, 30/40 के सामने, वेस्ट पटेल नगर, नई दिल्ली-110018

14/11/02

8516681

398

4 1994 मैसर्ज जैन वायर इंडस्ट्रीज , 34, औद्योगिक इस्टेट राजनंदगांव ( छत्तीसगढ़)

शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजनों के लिए ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक: भाग 4 ऐल्युमिनियम मिश्र धातु के लड़दार चालक (ऐल्युमिनियम मैग्नीशियम- सिलिकॉन टाइप)

8516782

18/11/02

1391

2 1992

रूम एयर कंडीशनर- भाग 2 स्प्लिटएयर कंडीशनर

मैसर्जु रॉयल रेफ्रीजरेशन एंड इलैक्ट्रिकल इंजीनियर्स, बी-90 , माया पुरी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज-1 , नई दिल्ली-110064

8516883

18/11/02

133

1993

इनैमल, आंतरिक: क ) अवरलेपन ( ख ) फिनिशिंग

मैसर्ज एवरशाइन पेंट एंड केमिकल इंडस्ट्रीज, डब्ल्यू-19 , ओखला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज II, नई दिल्ली-110020

8516984

18/11/02

1979

996

एक-फेज लघु ए सी और यूनिवर्सल बिजली की मोटर

मैसर्ज मधुबन इंटरप्राइजेज, 56, मालीवाड़ा, वसंत रोड, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

8517077

20/11/02

14543

1998

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा )

मैस हिमगिरी बेवरेजेज, जे-1-26, पहला फेज, सांगरिया मिनी ग्रोथ सेंटर, जोधपुर-342005 ( राजस्थान)

8517178

20/11/02

14151

2 1999

सिंचाई उपस्कर-छिड़काव यंत्र के पाइप- भाग 2:शीघ्र युग्मित पॉलिईथाइलीन के पाइप

मैसर्जु राजस्थान माइक्रो इरिगेशन सिस्टम्स प्रा. लि. एफ-14 रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, बिंदायक, जयपुर

8517279

20/11/02

14543

1998

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

मैसर्ज आर. के. फूड्स, ए-129, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज II , ओखला, मई दिल्ली-110020

8517380

20/11/02

398

2 1996 मैस यूनिटी मेटलक्राफ्ट्स, रिंग रोड नं . 2 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र,

शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन के लिए ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक: भाग 2 2401

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भानपुरी, मिरगांव, रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) 20/11/02

8517481

मैसं ओम साई पम्प स्पेयर्स प्रा.लि., 39 ए, सेक्टर ' सी' औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , मंडीदीप, जिला रायसेन (म.प्र. ) 8517582

20/11/02 मैसर्जु नमन रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज, प्लॉट नं. 106-डी, सेक्टर बी, औद्योगिक इस्टेट, सिरगिती, बिलासपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) 20/11/02

8517683

मैस नव भारतस्टील्स, प्लॉट नं. 24 70/1/1 , मंगोलपुर कलां, दिल्ली-110085

20/11/02

8517784

मैसर्ज ऐवरग्रीन इंडस्ट्रीज, खसरा संख्या 299 , गली नं. 9, गांव-गोकुलपुर, वजीराबाद रोड, दिल्ली-110094

8517885

20/11/02 मैस समरकिंग इलैक्ट्रीकल्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , ई-183, कविनगर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, गाजियाबाद ( उ. प्र. ) 8517986

18/11/02 मैस पारस इंटरप्राइजेज, 42, उमेश विहार, टी.पी. नगर, मेरठ (उ. प्र. )

8518079

22/11/02 मैस स्लीम वाटर प्रूफ कम्पाउंड प्रा. लि. , एफ-१ बी, पुराना रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, धोलपुर-328001 ( राजस्थान ) 25/11/02

8518180

मैस गणपति प्लाईवुड, बी-95 (जी ) , रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सीकर-332001

25/11/02

8518281

मैस श्री कृष्ण पेस्टिसाइड्स, ए- 335-ई-1 , रोड नं. 17, विश्वकर्मा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, जयपुर-302013

8518382

21/11/02 मैसर्ज मधुबन इंटरप्राइजेज, 56 , मालीवाड़ा, वसंत रोड, गाजियाबाद (उ.प्र. ) 25/11/02

8518483

मैसर्जुअग्रवाल होम एप्लायंसेज, 307/4, गली नं . 4, अशोक मोहल्ला, नांगलोई, नई दिल्ली-110041 8518584

25/11/02 मैसर्जुअग्रवाल होम एप्लायंसेज, 307/4, गली नं . 4 , अशोक मोहल्ला, नांगलोई , नई दिल्ली-110041 1496G1/2004-10

7 4

6 जस्तीकृत प्रबलित इस्पात के एल्युमिनियम के चालक

14102

1994 गहराई से पानी निकालने के हाथ पम्प- घटक- सीसेदार रांगा काँसा

1995

3736

रबड़ के तल्ले वाले केनवस के बूट

1992

13287.

अतिरिक्त गहराई से पानी निकालने के हाथ पम्प

7446

1994 प्रेशर कूकरके लिए रबड़ के गेस्केट

1979

374

बिजली के छत टाइप पंखे और रेगुलेटर

1979

3831

निर्जर्मक, उथला ( ड्रैसिंग ड्रम )

8541

1993 फर्श और लकड़ी के फर्नीचर के लिए पॉलिश

1990

1659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

1978

8960

मिथाइल पेराथियॉन भुरकने का पाउडर

1967

2312

नोदक टाइप एमी संवातन पंखे

2खंड 1992

302

201 बिजली के घरेलू और सामान साधित्रों की सुरक्षा भाग 2 विशेष अपेक्षाएँ खंड 201 बिजली के इमर्सन वाटर हीटर

1992

368

पानी गर्माने के बिजली केनिमज्जन हीटर 2402

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

7 8518685

25/11/02

4159

खनिज भरे खोलदार तापन ऐलीमेंट

1983 मैसर्जु अग्रवाल होम एप्लायंसेज, 307/4, गली नं. 4 , अशोक मोहल्ला, नांगलोई, नई दिल्ली-110049

8518786

25/11/02

374

1979

बिजली के छत टाइप पंखें और रेगुलेटर

मैस एसाइलम स्विचगियर्स, 26/13 , गंगा सहाय कालोनी, मंडोली, दिल्ली -110093

8518887

26/11/02

14543

1998

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानीके अलावा)

मैसर्जु माउंटेन ब्लूवाटर लि. , प्लाट नं. -1-117, साइट- सी, सूरजपुर, यू.पी.एस.आई.डी.सी. , ग्रेटर नौएडा, गौतमबुद्ध नगर, (उ. प्र.)

8518988

28/11/02

2312

नोदक टाइप एसी संवातन पंखे

1967 मैस राज इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, 214, फंक्शनल इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, पटपड़गंज , दिल्ली-110092

8519081

28/11/02

8074

मोनोक्रोटोफॉस एसएल

1990 मैस इंसेक्टिसाइड्स ( इंडिया ) लि. , ई-443, चोपंकी औद्यो. क्षेत्र, बीडा, भिवाडी, जिला-अलवर ( राजस्थान )

8519182

28/11/02

10908

1991

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस के लिए नम्य रबड़ की नलिका

मैस सीवेज इंडस्ट्रीज, खसरा नं . 665 , नवादा गांव, उत्तम नगर,. नई दिल्ली -110059

8519283

28/11/02

1417

1999

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्जुगोल्ड लस्टइंटरनैशनल (प्रा. ) लि. आई -93 , लाजपत नगर सैकेण्ड, सेंट्रल मार्केट (बेसमेंट ) नईदिल्ली-110025

8519384

28/11/02

9537

3 1983

विद्युत संस्थापनों के लिए नलिका: भाग 3 रोधन सामग्रियों की दृढ सादीं नलिकाएँ

मैसंकिसान एक्सट्रूजंस लि. (यूनिट- II ) प्लॉट नं. 52-53 , सागोर कुटी, सेक्टर III , पिथमपुर, जिला-धार (म. प्र. )

8519485

28/11/02

1417

1999

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैस धीरसंस ज्वैलर्स, एम-16ए, एम- ब्लाक मार्केट, ग्रेटर कैलाश -I , नईदिल्ली-110048

8519586

29/11/02

क्रेप बेंडेज

4605

1981 मैस सेवन सीज इंटरप्राइजेज , जे-4/ 1 ए, राजौरी गार्डन, नई दिल्ली -110027

8519687

02/12/02

4533

1995

अवचूषण उपकरण

मैसर्ज सुप्रीम इंटरप्राइजेज, एक्स-33 , नवीन शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110032

8519788

02/12/02

2347

1995

घरेलूप्रेशर कुकर

मैसर्जु जी. आर. इंडस्ट्रीज, बी-10/5, ग्रुपः इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, वजीरपुर, दिल्ली-110052 2403

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

02/12/02

8519889

मैसं हिन्दुस्तान कोका कोला बेवरेजेज प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट नं. -169-175 , एके वी एन इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, गांव-पिलुखेड़ी, जिला- राजगढ़ (म. प्र. ) 8519990

02/12/02 मैसर्ज जय आंजनेय गैस कंटेनर्स लि. , प्लॉट नं. 89 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, मालनपुर, जिला-भिंड ( म. प्र. ) 03-12-02

8520066

मैसर्ज परफेक्ट इंडस्ट्रीज, 90, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, हारदा-461331 (म० प्र०) 29-11-02

8520167

मैसर्ज ऐ० बी० प्लास्टो ( प्रा. ) इंडस्ट्रीज, ई-37 बुलंदशहर रोड, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, गाजियाबाद ( उ ० प्र० ) 8520268

05-12-02 मैसर्ज सोना प्रेशर कुकर्स, 81 , राजेन्द्र नगर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, मोहन नगर, गाजियाबाद ( उ ०प्र ० ) 05-12-02

8520369

मैसर्ज लारसन एंड टुब्रो लिमिटेड, हिरमी सीमेंट वर्क्स, डाकघर-हिरमी, तहसील सिमगा, जिला-रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) 8520470

09-12-02 मैसर्ज प्लाजा वायर्स एंड इलैक्ट्रिकल्स (प्रा० लि० ), ( यूनिट 2 ) , ए-10/1, झिलमिल औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, दिल्ली-110032

09-12-02

8520571

मैसर्ज भूमिका केबल्स इंडस्ट्रीज, खसरा संख्या 902/290, गली नं० 4, शालीमार गांव, दिल्ली-110088 09-12-02

8520672

मैसर्जट्रोपिकल ऐग्रो सिस्टम (इंडिया) लि. , 80/3/3 , आर्य नगर, 34-36, ग्रामीण औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, लोनी, जिला-गाजियाबाद ( उ० प्र० ) 8520773

10-12-02 मैसर्ज शिमला किचनवेयर इंडस्ट्रीज, 208/2 , राजेन्द्र नगर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, मोहन नगर, गाजियाबाद ( उ० प्र० ) 10-12-02

8520874

मैसर्ज राज एप्लायंसेज, 12ए/7डी, निहार बाजार, मैन रोड, मौजपुर, दिल्ली-110053 12-12-02

8520975

मैसर्ज अम्बा इंडस्ट्रीज, सी-156, बुलंदशहर रोड औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, गाजियाबाद ( उ ० प्र० )

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

3196

अल्प दाब पर द्रवित पैट्रोलियम गैसके लिए 5 लीटर जल क्षमता से अधिक के वेल्डकृत अल्पकार्बन इस्पात का सिलिंडर भाग 4 आविषालु और संक्षारक गैसों के लिएसिलिंडर

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा )

1983

9537

विद्युत संस्थापनों के लिए नलिका: भाग 3 रोधन सामग्रियों की दृढ सादी नलिकाएं

1995

2347

घरेलूप्रेशर कुकर

1989

8112

43ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

1990

694

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

1988

9968

1 इलास्टोमर रोधी केबल भाग 1 1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

11995

1987 आइसोप्रोटुरोन, डब्ल्यूपी

1995

2347

घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर

366

1991 बिजली की इस्तरियां

1999

2202

लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर टाइप ) : भाग 1 प्लाईवुड के सतहयुक्त पल्ले 2404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)] 1

6 8521068

12-12-02

3055

1994

चिकित्सा थर्मामीटर भाग 1 : ठोस डंडी टाइप

मैसर्ज हिन्दुस्तान थर्मोमीटर इंडस्ट्रीज, डब्ल्यूजेड-46/13, मुखर्जी पार्क, तिलक नगर, नई दिल्ली-110018

3521169

13-12-02

3975

1999

केबलोंके कवचन के लिये मृदु इस्पांत के तार, रूपित तार और टेप

मैसर्ज धार इंडस्ट्रीज लि० , सर्वे संख्या453/1 , गांव धानी, जिला-धार (म ०प्र ०)

8521270

16-12-02

8828

1996

बिजली के सहायकांग- घरेलू और समान संस्थापनों के लिये अति- करंट संरक्षण के परिपथ ब्रेकर

मैसर्ज किंजल इलैक्ट्रिकल्स प्रा० लि० , किंजल हाउस , जी०टी० रोड़, डाकघर-चिकम्बरपुर, साहिबाबाद, जिला- गाजियाबाद (उ ० प्र० )

8521371

16-12-02

1258-

बेयानेट लैम्प होल्डर

1987 मैसर्ज अमर इंडस्ट्रीज, 92/93 , मोडल बस्ती, नई दिल्ली-110005

8521472

16-12-02

418

1978

टंगस्टन तंतु के सामान्य सेवा के बिजली के लैम्प

मैसर्ज रोशनी लाइटिंग (इंडिया) 136 , अचरोंदा, परतापुर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, मेरठ ( उ ०प्र ०)

8521573

16-12-02

12016

1987

साइपरमेथ्रिन ई सी

मैसर्ज इंसेक्टिसाइड्स ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड, ई-443, चोपंकी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, बीडा, भिवाडी, जिला-अलवर (राजस्थान)

8521674

12-12-02

10124 12 1988 मैसर्ज वर्धमान पैट्रोकेम प्रा ० लि० , 6 किमी स्टोन , देहरादून- सहारनपुर रोड, गांव-कुम्हारहेड़ा, सहारनपुर (उ ०प्र ० )

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिये संविचरित पी वी सी फिटिंग: भाग 1 सामान्य अपेक्षाएं भाग 2 सॉकेट कीविशेष अपेक्षाएं

8521775

16-12-02

1161

1998

संरचना प्रयोजनों के लिये इस्पात की नलिकाएं

मैसर्ज हर्षो स्टील्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, बी-2, साइट IV, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, साहिबाबाद ( उ ० प्र ० )

8521876

18-12-02

5410

1992

सीमेंट रोगन

मैसर्ज स्लीन वाटर प्रूफ कम्पाउंड प्रा० लि० एफ-१ ( बी ) , पुराना रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, धौलपुर-328001 (राजस्थान)

8521977

19-12-02

374

1979

बिजली के छत टाइप पंखें और रेगुलेटर

मैसर्ज क्वालिटी होम एप्लायंसेज, 47, राजस्थानी उद्योग नगर, दिल्ली-110033

8522070

19-12-02

14543

1998

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानीके अलावा)

मैसर्ज पीएजी ( इंडिया ) इंटरप्राइजेज, खसरा नं ० 5/26, पुराना नं० 39, बुद्धपुर, जी ०टी० करनाल रोड, दिल्ली-110036

8522171

19-12-02

3906

1995 मैसर्ज माया फर्टिलाइजर्स एंड पेस्टीसाइड्स, आठवां कि मी स्टोन , भोपा रोड, मुजफ्फर नगर ( उ ०प्र ० )

फसल संरक्षण उपस्कर- हाथ चालित पीठ पर लादा जाने वाला फुहारा, पिस्टन टाइप [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

2405

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

8522272 19-12-02 मैसर्ज अमिका स्क्रीन वर्क्स, 2डी, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, मेक्सी रोड, उज्जैन (म०प्र० )

8522373

20-12-02 मैसर्ज के ०के ० इंडस्ट्रीज , जी-1-109, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, झुंझुनू(राजस्थान)

8522474

20-12-02 मैसर्ज एस जी फार्मुलेशंस, 50, 1 सेक्टर, गोविंदपुरा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भोपाल

8522575

23-12-02 मैसर्ज अनिष्का ज्वैलर्स, 161, गफ्फार मार्केट, हरध्यान सिंह रोड, करोल बाग , नईदिल्ली-110005

8522676

24-12-02 मैसर्ज मेडिटैक इंडस्ट्रीज, 37, साउथ अनारकली , सोम बाज़ार के पास, चंदर नगर, दिल्ली-110052

8522777

26-12-02 मैसर्ज इंसक्टिसाइड्स ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड, ई-443, चोपंकी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, बीडा, भिवाडी, जिला-अलवर ( राजस्थान) 8522878

26-12-02 मैसर्ज राजस्थान इंजीनियर्स एंड कांट्रेक्टर, इंटरप्राइजेज, एफ-45, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सीकर (राजस्थान)

26-12-02

8522979

मैसर्ज भारत वुडक्राफ्टस, खसरा नं० 16/13 , मिन ( 1-05 ), 16/14 मिन (0-09 ) , खसरा नं ० 16/13, मिन ( 1-13 ), 14/24/1 ( 0-13 ) खसरा न० 16/13 , मिन ( 1-13, ) शाहबाद दौलतपुर, दिल्ली-110042 8523072

27-12-02 मैसर्ज आर० जे० पी० (इंडिया ) , सी-7, डी एस आई डी सी इंजी. , काम्प्लैक्स, मंगोलपुरी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज-1 , दिल्ली-110083 8523173

30-12-02 मैसर्ज दीप इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स, आर जेड-96 बी, रवि नगर ऐक्सटेंशन नईदिल्ली-110018

7 4

2347

1995 घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर

14543

1998 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

9825

1993 क्लोरीन कीगोलियां

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

3390

1988 रक्तचापमापी , पारा युक्त

1980

9356

बूटाक्लोरपायसनीय सांद्र

14151

2 1999 सिंचाई उपस्कर- छिड़काव यंत्र के पाइप-भाग 2 : शीघ्र युग्मित पॉलिईथाइलीन के पाइप

1328

1996 परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

1990

694

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

1992

6315

भारी दरवाजों के लिये फर्श कमानियां (द्रवचालन द्वारा नियंत्रित ) 2406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SBC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

7 8523274 30-12-02

8828

1996 मैस बैलकम इंडिया लि. , बी-33 , पुराना विष्णु गार्डन, नई दिल्ली -110018

बिजली के सहायकांग - घरेलूऔर समान संस्थापनों के लिये अतिकरंट संरक्षण के परिपथ ब्रेकर

8523375 01-01-03

694

1990

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैस कल्याण केबल, 458-466, गली नं . 8 ( दूसरा तल ) , शम्भुनाथ कम्पाउंड, फ्रेंडस कालोनी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, जी.टी. रोड, शाहदरा , दिल्ली- 110095

8523476 02-01-03

1417

1999 मैस अंसुल इंटरनेशनल , ई - 358 , निर्माण विहार, दिल्ली - 110092

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

8523577 01-01-03

1417

1999

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैस गोकुल दास एंड कं. ज्वैलर्स, 2502, गुरूद्वारा रोड, करोल बाग , नई दिल्ली 110005

8523678 03-01-03

5382

1985

गैस मेंस, जल मेन्स और सीवर के लिये रबड़ सीलिंग रिंग

मैसर्जु रूबी रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज, एच-726 - ए, रोड नं. 9 एफ 2 , विश्वकर्मा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, जयपुर - 302013

8523779 02-01-03

280-

1978

सामान्य इंजीनियरी प्रयोजनों के लिये मृदु इस्पात के तार

मैस धार इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , (टेलीटेप डिविजन ) सर्वे नं. 453/1 , गांव धानी, जिला - धार (म.प्र . )

8523880 03-01-03

5894

1980

बालू क्षेपण के लिये रबड़ के होज

मैस पदमिनी इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , गांव- दुदाहेरा, डाकघर खेकड़ा, बागपत (उ.प्र. )

8523981 03-01-03

3903

1984

डाइमिथोएट पायसनीय सांद्र

मैसर्ज इंसेक्टिसाइड्स ( इंडिया ) लि. , ई-443, चोपंकी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, बिडा, भिवाडी, जिला अलवर ( राजस्थान )

8524074 06-01-03

8783 4 खंड 3 1995 मैसर्ज, माइक्रो सुपर केबल्स ( प्रा ) लि. , 36/20 , दिलशाद गार्डन , जी.टी. रोड, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110095

निमज्जनीय मोटरों के लिये कुंडलन के तार भाग 4 अलंग अलग तार - खंड 3 पॉलिइस्टर और पालिप्रापीलीन रोधी कुंडलन तार

8524175 07-01-03

9301

1990

गहराई से पानी निकालने के हथबरमे

मैस नेचुरल फ्लो पालिमर्स प्रा . लि. , ई-227, रोड नं -9- ई, वी. के. आई. एरिया, जयपुर - 302093

8524276 07-01-03

1038

1983

इस्पात के दरवाजे, खिड़कियां औरसंवातक

मैसर्ज सुरभि मेटल्स (इंडिया ) प्रा. लि. , सी-173 , मंडोर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, जोधपुर - 342006 2407

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ1 , 1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7 1

14151 2 1999 07-01-03

8524377

सिंचाई उपस्कर छिड़काव यंत्र के पाइप- भाग 2: शीघ्र युग्मित पॉलिईथाइलीन के पाइप

मैसर्ज कृति इंडस्ट्रीज ( इंडिया ) लि. , प्लॉट नं . 75-86 , पिथमपुर, सेक्टर- II जिला - धार (म.प्र. )

14151 1 1999 8524478 07-01-03

सिंचाई उपस्कर- छिड़काव यंत्र के पाइप भाग 1: पॉलिईथाइलीन केपाइप

मैस कृति इंडस्ट्रीज ( इंडिया ) लि. , पलॉट नं. 75-86 , पिथमपुर, सेक्टर- II जिला धार ( म.प्र. )

1709

1984 8524579 09-01-03

बिजली के पंखों की मोटरों के लिए संधारित्र

मैसं देवसन इंडस्ट्रीज, खसरा नं. 902/290, गली नं. 4, गांव शालीमार, शालीमार बाग , दिल्ली- 110052

11737

1996 10-01-03

औद्योगिक बोरे सिलने की मशीनें

8524680

मैसर्ज सुमेक इंजीनियर्स प्रा. लि. , डी-79 , ओखला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज 1 , नई दिल्ली - 110020

12269

8524781

1987 13-01-03

53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

मैस सर्वोत्तम सीमेंट प्रा. लि. , डागा नगर, चरकारा , नोखा - 334803 जिला - बीकानेर ( राजस्थान)

1999

13779

8524882 14-01-03

ए सी स्थैतिक वाटऑवर मीटर, श्रेणी 1 और 2

मैस केपिटल मीटर्स लि. , ए-17 , सेक्टर 9 , नौएडा, जिला - गौतम बुद्ध नगर ( उ.प्र. )

280

1978 8524983 14-01-03

सामान्य इंजीनियरी प्रयोजनों के लिए मृदु इस्पात के तार

मैसर्जु सार टेली- टेक्नोलॉजीज लि. (यूनिट-2) सर्वे नं. 514/1 , 514/2/1 , ए.बी. रोड, गांव धानी, जिला धार ( म.प्र. )

1979

996

27-12-02

8525076

एक-फेज लघु ए सी और यूनिवर्सल बिजली की मोटर

मैस कामधेनु इंटरप्राइजेज, बाघवाली कालोनी, राजापुर गांव के पास, गाजियाबाद - 201002

398

1994 8525177 16-01-03 मैस आकाश केबल्स, 7, न्यूइंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, रावाभाटा रायपुर - 493221 ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजनों के लिए ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक : भाग 4 ऐल्युमिनियम मिश्र धातु के लड़दार चालक (ऐल्युमिनियम मेग्नेशियम सिलिकॉन टाइप )

1992

13287

8525278 17-01-03.

अतिरिक्त गहराई से पानी निकालने के हाथ पम्प

मैसर्जु अजय पम्प्स एंड स्पेयर्स, 812/ई-12 ( ए-1 ) , समतल जोन, बीडा इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया, भिवाडी, जिला-अलवर (राजस्थान)

1988

1554

8525379 17-01-03 मैसर्ज एक्टिव इंडस्ट्रीज, सी-618 , डी एस आई डी सी, नरेला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, दिल्ली-110040

पीवीसी रोधी ( भारी कार्य ) बिजली के केबल : भाग 1 1100 वो. तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए 2408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 1

8525480 16-01-03

निमञ्जनीय पम्पसेट

8034

1989 मैसर्ज उजाला पम्प्स प्रा. लि. , एफ-83 , रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भिवाडी-309019 जिला- अलवर ( राजस्थान)

8525581 20-01-03

13287

1992

अतिरिक्त गहराई से पानी निकालने के हाथ पम्प

मैसर्ज नेचुरल फ्लो पॉलिमर्स प्रा. लि. , ई-227, रोड नं. १ ई , वी. के. आई. एरिया, जयपुर

8525682 20-01-03

362

पार्लियामेंट कब्जे

1991 मैसर्ज मोनिका स्टील्स प्रा. लि. ए-56 , सेक्टर 8 , नोएडा-201301 जिला- गौतम बुद्ध नगर ( उ.प्र. )

8525783 20-01-03

1988

1293

250 वोल्ट और 16 एम्पीयर तक के रेटित करंट के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेट

मैसर्ज सोनू इंटरप्राइजेज, 3258/236 , रामनगर, त्रि नगर, दिल्ली-110035

8525884 17-01-03

1554

1988 मैसर्ज राम संस , सी-29 , औद्योगिक इस्टेट, बाइस गोदाम जयपुर-302006

पी वी सी रोधी ( भारी कार्य) बिजली के केबल : भाग. 1 1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

8525985 21-01-03

7466

1994

प्रेशर कुकर के लिए रबड़ के गेस्केट

मैसर्ज यादव रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज 369, शहजादाबाग , इंदरलोक, नईदिल्ली

8526078 22-01-03

2148

1981

बिजली के उपस्कर के लिए ज्वालासह इंक्लोजर

मैसंवी. औटोमैट एंड इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स प्रा. लि. , एफ-61 , ओखला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज 1 नई दिल्ली -110020

8526179 22-01-03

1239

1990 मैस हर्षो स्टील्स प्रा. लि. , बी-2, साइट IV, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , साहिबाबाद (उ.प्र. )

मृदु इस्पात की नलिकाएँ, नलिकाकार और अन्य पिटवां इस्पात की फिटिंगें भाग 1 मृदु इस्पात की नालिकाएँ

8526280 22-01-03

4246

1992

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैसों के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू गैस के चूल्हे

मैस इंद्रप्रस्थ इंडस्ट्रीज, 24/73, पहला तल, वेस्टपंजाबी बाग, नई दिल्ली-110026

8526381 23-01--03

694

1990

1100 वो. तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैस प्रकाश पीवीसी उद्योग ( प्रा.लि. ) 458-466, शंभुनाथ कम्पाउंड गली नं. 8 , फ्रैंडस कालोनी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, नई दिल्ली-110095

8526482 23-01-03

1997

1061

रोगाणुनाशील द्रव , फिनोलिक टाइप

मैसर्ज, आर. एंड जे. केमिकल्स, के- 26, एस डी ए कम्पाउंड लसुदिया मोरी (एनेक्स) , देवास नाका, लसुदिया पुलिस स्टेशन केपीछे, ए. बी. रोड, इंदोर(म.प्र.) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( 11 ) ]

8526583 23-01-03 मैसर्जु अंकेश इंडस्ट्रीज, 1/11469-70, गली नं. 4, सुभाष पार्क विस्तार, शाहदरा , दिल्ली 110032 27-01-03

8526684

मैस उपहार केबल इंडस्ट्रीज, बी-52, रामा रोड, नई दिल्ली - 110015 8526785 22-01-03 मैस पशुपति इम्पेक्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , जी-1069, फेज III , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भिवाडी - 301019 28-01-03

8526886

मैसं कांटिनेंटल स्प्रेयर्स ( रजि. ) ई-5 , मायापुरी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज II , नई दिल्ली-110064 29-01-03

8526987

मैसर्जु एस. एस . जी. एक्जिम ( प्रा. ) लि. , 1853 , सी/10 गोविंदपुरी विस्तार, कालकाजी, नई दिल्ली- 110019

28-01-03

8527080

मैसं साहु संस, एफ -70 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , हरिद्वार (उत्तरांचल)

28-01-03

8527181

मैसं प्रेस्टीज ओनिका लि. , धालबाला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, टिहरी गढ़‌वाल ( उत्तरांचल ) 31-01-03

8527282

मैसं स्वर्ण प्रभा ज्वैलर्स, 16 , हैप्पी होम , चौथी " सी" रोड, सरदारपुरा पुलिस स्टेशन के पास, जोधपुर ( राजस्थान ) 31-01-03

8527383

मैसं फेरोकॉन, मोहाबैबाला इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, सहारनपुर रोड, देहरादून (उत्तरांचल)

03-02-03

8527484

मैसं अगिया राम खन्ना एंड संस, 308/1 ई , शहजादा बाग, पुराना रोहतक रोड, दिल्ली -110035

04-02-03

8527585

मैस इंडोटेक स्विचगीयर एंड कंट्रोल्स, 67, राजेन्द्र नगर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, साहिबाबाद, डाकघर - मोहन नगर, गाजियाबाद-201007 04-02-03

8527686

मैसं मदर डेयरी फूड्स प्रोसेसिंग लि. , अठारहवां कि.मी. स्टोन, गाजियाबाद-हापुड़ रोड, पिलखुवा-201313 1496G1/2004-11

2409

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

1988

1293

250 बोल्ट और 16 एम्पीयर तक के रेटित करंट के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेट

199.0

694

1100 वो. तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

1995

2347

बरेलू प्रेशर कुकर

1994

13983

घरेलू प्रयोजनों के लिए स्टेनलेस इस्पात के सिंक

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक रत्रनिज पानी के अलावा)

1983

9537 3

विद्युत संस्थापनों के लिए नलिकाएं : भाग 3 रोधन सामग्रियों की दृछ सादी नलिकाएं

1977

2418

सामान्य लाइटिंग सेवा के लिये मलिकार प्रतिदीप्ति लैम्प - भाग 1 : अपेक्षाएं और परीक्षण

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1980

1237

सीमेंट कंक्रीट की फर्शबंदी टाइल

1991

13049

शीतल जल सेवाओं के लिए .. ड्राइफ्राम डाइप ( प्लास्टिक ढांचा) फ्लोट चालित , बाल्य

1999

13779

ए सी स्थैतिक बाटऑबर मीडर, श्रेणी 1. और 2

1998

13334

मलाई रहित दूध पाउडर- भाग

1: मानक ग्रेड 2410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8527787 06-02-03 मैस बी. पी. आर. इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, बी ई -345/ए, गली नं. - 2 , बी ई ब्लॉक, हरि नगर , नई दिल्ली-110064 8527888 11-02-03 मैसर्ज़ केयर मार्केटिंग एजेंसी, जयरत नाका, सीयोनी (म.प्र. ) 8527989

11-02-03 मैस यूनिकिल पेस्टिसाइड्स प्रा.लि. , 17/1, बी एंड सी इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, विदिशा ( म.प्र. ) -464002 8528082 11-02-03 मैसर्ज एग्रो केयर, डी-11 एंड डी-12 , उद्योग पुरम, दिल्ली रोड, मेरठ ( उ.प्र. ) 8528183 14-02-03 मैसर्जु लता होम एप्लायंसेज, डब्ल्यूजेड-4 , बसई दारा पुर, नईदिल्ली-110015

8528284 14-02-03 मैसर्ज लक्ष्मी मिल्क- टेस्टिंग मशीनरी कं. , ए-१०, ग्रुप इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, वजीरपुर, दिल्ली -110052 8528385 18-02-03 मैसर्ज उडान इंटरनैशनल, 25, विजय उद्योग नगर, चितवाड रोड, इंदौर

8528486 18-02-03 मैसर्ज सार टेली टेक्नोलॉजीज लि. , (यूनिट II ) सर्वे नं. 514/1 ,, 514/2/1 , ए.बी. रोड, गांव धानी, जिला-धार ( म.प्र. )

8528587 18-02-03 मैसर्जुतिरूपति स्प्रिंकलर्स, ए-1 , उद्योग विहार, रोड नं. 17, वी.के.आई. एरिया, जयपुर 8528688 19-02-03 मैस मेघास्विचगीयर, एल-15 , उद्योग नगर, रोहतक रोड, नांगलोई , दिल्ली-110049 8528789 20-02-03 मैसर्ज मॉडर्न फूड इंडस्ट्रीज ( इंडिया ) लि. , सी -4 , लारेंस रोड इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, दिल्ली-110035

8528890 20-02-03 मैस पी.पी. ज्वैलर्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , 2708 , बैंक स्ट्रीट, करोल बाग , नई दिल्ली-110005

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

996

1979

एक-फेज लघु ए सी और... यूनिवर्सल बिजली की मोटर

14543

1998

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

4323

1980

इंडोसल्फान पायसनीय सांद्र

1980

इंडोसल्फान पायसनीय सांद्र

4323

11951

डेजर्ट कूलर के पम्पसेट

1987.

1825

1983

ऐल्युमिनियम मिश्रधातु की दूध की टंकियां

374

1979

बिजली के छत टाइप पंखे और रेगुलेटर

1999

3975

केबलों के कवचन के लिये मृदु इस्पात के तार, रूपित तार और टेप

12232 1 1996

सिंचाई उपस्कर -घूर्णी छिड़काव यंत्र: भाग 1 डिजाइन और प्रचालन अपेक्षाएं

8828

1996

बिजली के सहायकांग - घरेलु और समान संस्थापनों के लिये अतिकरंट संरक्षण के परिपथ ब्रेकर

1973

7021

शिशुओं और प्रिस्कूल बच्चों के लिए प्रोटीन बहुल पूरक खाद्य पदार्थ

1417

1999

स्वर्ण एवं मिश्र धातुएं,

आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-

शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

8528991 20-02-03

11995

1987

आइसोप्रोटुरान डब्ल्यूपी

मैसर्ज इंसेक्टिसाइड्स ( इंडिया ) लि. , ई-443-44, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, चोपंकी, भिवाडी, जिला-अलवर ( राजस्थान ) कार्यालय: 401-402, लुसा टॉवर , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8529084 24-02-03 मैस एसाइलम स्विचगीयर्स, 26/13, गंगा सहाय कालोनी, मंडोली, दिल्ली-110093 8529185 25-02-03 मैसर्जु बोनी बेबी केयर प्रा. लि. , सी-6, सेक्टर 58 , फेज III , नौएडा (उ.प्र. ) , कार्यालय: 4876, पारस नाथमार्ग

8529286 24-02-03 मैस कैब कॉम इंडिया, 40/5, गली नं. 1 , मोहन नगर विस्तार, समयपुर, दिल्ली -110042 8529387 24-02-03 मैसर्जमॉडर्न इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स प्रा. लि. , ए-4/15, साइट IV, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , साहिबाबाद ( उ.प्र. ).

8529488 21-02-03 मैस पैट्रोकेम स्पेसिएलिटीज, बी-24, इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, आईटीआई के पास , मेरठ रोड, मुजफ्फरनगर-251003 8529589 27-02-03 मैसर्जुजीएससी टफन्ड ग्लास (प्रा. ) लि. , सी-45-47, सेक्टर -57, नौएडा-201301

8529690 25-02-03 मैसर्ज वाम फोम प्रा. लि. , भोला रोड, मुलतान नगर, मेरठ-250002 (उ.प्र. ) 8529791 27-02-03 मैसर्ज पारस इंटरप्राइजेज , 42, उमेश विहार, टी.पी. नगर, मेरठ (उ.प्र. )

27-02-03

8529892

मैसर्ज साहस इंडस्ट्रीज, के-214, साइट V, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , सूरजपुर, ग्रेटर नौएडा ( उ.प्र. ) 8529993 26-02-03 मैसर्जजैन इंडस्ट्रियल लाईटिंग कार्पोरेशन, बी-70/22, डीएसआईडीसी औद्योगिक काम्प्लैक्स, लारेंस रोड, दिल्ली-110035

28-02-03

8530069

मैसर्ज सोनू इंटरप्राइजेज, 3258/236, राम नगर, त्रिनगर, दिल्ली-110035

8530170 28-02-03 मैसर्ज होप फैशंस, एन -10, साउथ ऐक्सटेंशन भाग -1 , नई दिल्ली-110049 28-02-03

8530271

मैसर्ज एस. आर. स्विचगीयर, एफ-34/2, ओखला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज- II , नई दिल्ली-110020

2411

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22. 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926.

2082

1993 अचल भंडारण टाइप पानी गर्माने के बिजली के हीटर

14625

1999 प्लास्टिक की प्रभरण बोतलें

1 1988

7098

क्रासलिंक वाले पॉलिईथाइलीन रोधी पीवीसी खोलदार केबल : भाग-1 , 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

398

1 1996 शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन के लिए ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक भाग-1 ऐल्युमिनियम के लड़दार चालक

8887

1995 सड़कोंके लिये बिटुमेन पायस (कैशटियोनिक टाइप )

2553

2 1992 निरापद ग्लास , भाग 2 सड़क परिवहन के लिए

1987

8391

कुशनिंग के लिए रबड़ीकृत कॉयल की चाद्दरें

1989 निर्जर्मक, उपकरण (टेबल मॉडल ) 5022

2312

1967 नोदक टाइप एसी संवातन पंखे

2082

1993 अचल भंडारण टाइप पानी गर्माने के बिजली के हीटर

3854

1997 घरेलूऔर समान प्रयोजनों के लियेस्विच

1417

1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1988

1293

250 वोल्ट और 16 एम्पीयर तक के रेटित करंट के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेट 2412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1 .

5 6

7 8530372 03-03-03

1417

1999

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्जु मेहरासंस ज्वैलर्स, (प्रोप . सर्वेश्वरी डाइमंड्स एंड फाइनेंस लि. ) , पी-110 / 1 , अजमल खां रोड, करोल बाग , नई दिल्ली -110005

8530473

13779

1999 04-03-03

ए सी स्थैतिक वाटऑवर मीटर, श्रेणी 1 और 2

मैसर्जु फतेहपुरिया विद्युत उद्योग (प्रा. ) लि. , प्लॉट नं. 66 , सेक्टर 1 , पिथमपुर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, पिथमपुर, जिला धार (म.प्र. )

8530574 03-03-03

11536

1997

शिशुओं के लिये प्रक्रमित धान से बने पूरक आहार

मैसर्जु कंटिनेंटल मिल्कोज ( इंडिया ) लि. , गांव- हबीबपुर, डाकघर कुलेशरा , नोएडा- दादरी रोड, ग्रेटर नोएडा, जिला-गौतम बुद्ध नगर (उ.प्र. )

8530675 03-03-03

398

1996 मैसर्ज धार इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड, (टेलीटेप डिविजन ) सर्वे नं. 453/1 , गांव धानी, जिला धार (म.प्र. )

शिसेपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन के लिए ऐल्युमिनियम के चालकः भाग-2, जस्तीकृत प्रबलित इस्पात ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक

8530776 03-03-03

398

2 1996 मैसर्ज सार टेली टेक्नोलॉजीज लि. , (यूनिट-2), सर्वे नं. 514/1 , 514/2/1 , ऐ.बी. रोड, गांव धानी, जिला धार (म.प्र. )

शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन के लिए ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक : भाग 2 जस्तीकृत प्रबलित इस्पात ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक

8530877 28-02-03 .

694

1990 मैसर्ज भट्टर केबल इंडस्ट्रीज, नागौर रोड, चरकारा, नोखा-334803

1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

8530978 03-03-03

996

1979

एक-फेज लघु ए सी और यूनिवर्सल बिजली की मोटर

मैस लता होम एप्लायंसेज, डब्ल्यूजेड-4 , बसई दारापुर, नईदिल्ली-110015

8531071 03-03-03

2312

1967

नोदक टाइप एसी संवातन पंखे,

मैस लता होम एप्लायंसेज, डब्ल्यूजेड -4 , बसई दारापुर, नई दिल्ली-110015

8531172 03-03-03

996

1979

एक-फेज लघु ए सी और यूनिवर्सल बिजली की मोटर

मैस नाकासु इंटरनैशनल प्रा.लि., बी-54 , पहला तल, भाग ( बी) , ग्रुप वजीरपुर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, दिल्ली-110052

8531273 05-03-03

7098

1 1988 मैस पाइमेन केबल्स ( इंडिया ) , ए-24, डी एस आई डी सी नरेला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, दिल्ली-110040

8531374 27-02-03

7933

197.5

क्रासलिंक वाले पॉलिईथाइलीन रोधी पी वी सी खोलदार केबल: भाग 1 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये घरेलू गद्दों के लिये नम्थ पालियूरिथेन झाग

मैसर्जु जे.जे. फोम्स प्रा. लि. , बी-12/2 , साइट IV, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, साहिबाबाद, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

8531475 03-03-03

नोदक टाइप एसी संवातन पंखे 2312

1967 मैस फॉस्ट फॉरफर्ड इंटरप्राइजेज, ए-97, गुजरांवाला टाउन , पार्ट-1 दिल्ली-110009 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

04-03-03

8531576

मैस स्टरलिंग ऐग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज, प्लॉट नं. क्यू-5 , 6 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र गिरोंजी, मालनपुर, जिला-भिंड (म. प्र. )

04-03-03

8531677

मैसर्ज विरगो इम्पेक्स, 5- बी, रूप नगर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, लोनी , गाजियाबाद ( उ. प्र. ) 8531778 04-03-03 मैस डैली फूडस, गांव गोइना, हापुड़-मोदीनगर रोड , हापुड़ जिला गाजियाबाद (उ. प्र. ) 05-03-03

8531879

मैसर्ज के. एन . इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, 59, गोविंद मोहल्ला, हैदरपुर, दिल्ली-110052

07-03-03

8531980

मैस मैब गोल्ड फोर्म्स, प्लाट नं. 2 ए- डी, सेक्टर-सी, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सिरगिती, बिलासपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) , 06-03-03

8532073

मैस गौरव रोशनी लि. , ए-30 , झिलमिल औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, शाहदरा, दिल्ली-110095

8532174 07-03-03 मैसर्ज स्वीटॉन इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, सी-49, जितार नगर, परवाना रोड, खुरेजी , दिल्ली-110051 07-03-03

8532275

मैस स्वीटॉन इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, सी-49, जितार नगर, परवाना रोड, खुरेजी, दिल्ली-110051 07-03-03

8532376

मैसर्जस्वीटॉन इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, सी-49 , जितार नगर, परवाना रोड, खुरेजी, दिल्ली-110051 11-03-03

8532477

मैस विशाल मिनरल्स एंड इंजीनियर्स, एच-174 , फेज- II , रीको ग्रोथ सेंटर, गांव मावल, आबूरोड, जिला- सिरोही ( राजस्थान ) 11-03-03

8532578

मैसर्जु दास हिताची लि. , 8/9 वाँ माइल स्टोन , जे.टी. रोड, साहिबाबाद, डाकघर मोहन नगर, गाजियाबाद ( उ. प्र.)

2413

1998

12299

डेयरी व्हाइटनर

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा )

1 1998

13334

मलाई रहित दूध पाउडर, मानक ग्रेड

1987

1258

वेयोनेट लैम्प होल्डर

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा )

1999

371

सीलिंग रोज

1992

368

पानी गर्माने के बिजली के निमज्जन हीटर

2002

4159

खनिज भरे खोलदार तापन ऐलीमेंट

2 1992

302

खंड

20 घरेलूऔर समान बिजली के साधित्रों की सुरक्षा: भाग 2 विशेष अपेक्षाएँ, खंड 201 पानी गर्माने के बिजली के निमज्जन हीटर

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

1999

13779

ए सी स्थैतिक वाटऑवर मीटर, श्रेणी 1 और 2 2414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

7 8532679 11-03-03

6538

1971

प्रतिस्कंदी सामग्री से बने तीन पिन प्लग

मैस हाइटेक प्रोडक्ट्स (प्रा. ) लि. , ए-13, बी-1 विस्तार, मोहन कोऑपरेटिव इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, बदरपुर, मथुरा रोड, नई दिल्ली-110044

8532780. 12-03-03

2201

1 1999 मैस गणपति प्लाईवुड, बी-95, (बी) , रीको इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, सीकर-332001

लकड़ीके सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर टाइप ) : भाग 1 प्लाईवुड के सतहयुक्त पल्ले

8532881 11-03-03

374

1979

बिजली के छत टाइप पंखे और रेगुलेटर

मैस कुसुम इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, डब्ल्यूजेड-13 ए , बसई दारा पुर, नईदिल्ली-110015

8532982 12-03-03

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

मैस सरित प्रवाह, ए-184 ए, महिपालपुर विस्तार, (एम टी एन एल ऐक्सचेंज लेन ) नई दिल्ली-110037

8533075 12-03-03

10908

1991

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस के लिये नम्य रबड़ की नलिका

मैसर्ज एवरग्रीन इंडस्ट्रीज, खसरा नं. 299 , गली नं. 9, गांव गोकुलपुर, वजीराबाद रोड़, नईदिल्ली-110094

8533176 13-03-03

2347

घरेलूप्रेशर कुकर

1995 मैसर्ज स्टार एप्लायंसेज 894, अलीपुर गढ़ी, नरेला रोड, दिल्ली-110036

8533277 13-03-03

4923

1997

संरचना उपयोग के लिये इस्पात के खोखले खंड

मैसर्जु बिहार ट्यूब्स लि. , ए-19, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सिकंदराबाद, जिला बुलंदशहर ( उत्तर प्रदेश )

8533378 17-03-03

1293

1988 मैसर्जु गिलार्ड रेडियो प्रोडक्ट्स (प्रा. ) लि. , 256, चांद नगर, नईदिल्ली-110018

250 वोल्ट और 16 एम्पीयर तक के रेटित करंट के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेट

8533479 17-03-03

बेयोनेट लैम्प होल्डर

1258

1987 मैसर्जु गौरव रोशनी लि. , ए-30, झिलमिल औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, शाहदरा, दिल्ली-110095

8533580 17-03-03

7098

1 1988 मैस सेवन स्टार इलैक्ट्रिकल्स प्रा. लि. , 1/488-504, दामोदर पार्क , दिलशाद गार्डन , दिल्ली-110095

8533681 17-03-03

2347

क्रासलिंक वाले पॉलिईथाइलीन रोधी पी वी सी खोलदार केबल : भाग 1 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर

1995 मैसर्जु बिमल फैक्टरी, ए-70, जगतपुरी, मंडोली रोड, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110093

8533782 20-03-03

13779

1999

ए सी स्थैतिक वाटऑवर मीटर, श्रेणी 1 और 2

मैस हाई- प्रिंट इलैक्ट्रोमैक प्रा.लि. , जी 1-271 , रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सीतापुरा, टोंक रोड, जयपुर-302022 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2415

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ1 , 1926

7 8533883 17-03-03

10276 1 1982

एडिसन स्क्रू लैम्प होलकर : भाग 1 अपेक्षाएं और परीक्षण.

मैसर्जु शिवा इंडस्ट्रीज, 32/7ए, गली नं . 7 , भिखम सिंह कालोनी , विश्वास नगर, शाहदरा, दिल्ली-110032

8533984 20-03-03

398

1 1996 मैसर्जु प्रेम केबल्स (प्रा. ) लि. , पीपलिया कलां-306307 जिला-पाली ( राजस्थान)

शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन के लिए ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक: भाग 1 ऐल्युमिनियम के लड़दार चालक

8534077 21-03-03

3055

1 1994

चिकित्सा थर्मामीटर. भाग 1 : ठोस डंडी टाइप

मैसर्जु जे वी एम थर्मामीटर इंडस्ट्रीज, सी-145, 2 तल, ( बैक साइड ) , फेज 1 , नारायणा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, नई दिल्ली-110028

8534178 19-03-03.

2062

1999

सामान्य संरचना प्रयोजनों के लिये इस्पात

मैसर्ज कैपिटल इस्पात लिमिटेड, ई-136, फेज-1 , रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भिवाडी, जिला-अलवर ( राजस्थान)

8534279 21-03-03

8828

1996

मैस ऐलमेकस्विचगीयर्स, 7/19, अर्जुन गली, 60 फीट रोड क्रास, विश्वास नगर, दिल्ली-110032

8534380 21-03-03

996

1979

एक-फेज लघु ए सी और यूनिवर्सल बिजली की मोटर

मैस फास्ट फोरवार्ड इंटरप्राइजेज, ए-97, गुजरांवाला टाउन, पार्ट -1 , दिल्ली-110009

8534481 24-03-03

12817

1997

स्टेनलैस इस्पात के टक्करदार कब्जे

मैसर्ज यूरेशिया डोरडिवाइसेज लि. , सी-96, सेक्टर -8, नौएडा-201301 (उ.प्र. )

8534582 24-03-03

1341

1992

इस्पात के टक्करदार कब्जे

मैसर्ज यूरेशिया डोरडिवाइसेज लि. , सी-96 , सेक्टर-8, नौएडा-201301 ( उ.प्र. )

8534683 24-03-03

1999

13779

ए सी स्थैतिक वाटऑवर मीटर, श्रेणी 1 और 2

मैस पिंकसिटी इलेक्ट्रानिक्स प्रा. लि. , जी 1/519 , सीतापुरा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, जयपुर

8534784 24-03-03

1038

1983

इस्पात के दरवाजे , खिड़कियां और संवातक

मैसर्ज जांगिड इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स, एच-1 , 61 , सरना डूंगर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जयपुर

8534885 25-03-03

2347

1995

घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर

मैस बेनर्सेस डोमेस्टिक एप्लायंसेज (इंडिया) , जी-62 , लक्ष्मी पार्क, नांगलोई दिल्ली-110041

8534986 25-03-03

2202

1999 मैसर्ज पंचम प्लाईवुड प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, डी-44 एवं 44ए, रीकों औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, कालाडेरा , जयपुर -303801

लकड़ी के फ्लश दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर टाइप ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड के सतहयुक्त पल्ले 2416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA I , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ) 1

7 8535079 26-03-03

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

मैसर्जु सविता एक्वा मिनरल ( प्रा ) लि. , प्लॉट नं. जी -1-1423, फेज- V, भिवाडी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भिवाडी, जिला अलवर ( राजस्थान )

8535180 26-03-03

3055 1 1994

चिकित्सा थर्मामीटर भाग 1: ठोस डंडी टाइप

मैसं विल्को इंटरप्राइजेज , टी-1716 , देशबंधु गुप्ता रोड, करोल बाग , नई दिल्ली-110005

8535281 27-03-03

1992

13592

मैसर्जु लक्ष्मी पाइप्स एंड फिटिंग्स प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट नं . 529, सेक्टर III , पिथमपुर, जिला- धार ( म.प्र. )

भवनों में संबातन और वर्षा के पानी के सिस्टम सहित मिट्टी और. अपशिष्ट निकास तंत्र के लिये यूपी बी सी पाइप

8535382

325

1996

तीन फेज प्रेरण मोटर

26-03-03 मैस बी.पी. आर. इलैक्ट्रिकल्स , बीई-345/ए, गली नं. 2 , बीई ब्लॉक , हरिनगर, नई दिल्ली-110064

8535483

428

डिस्टेम्पर, धोंने योग्य

.2000 27-03-03 मैसं ओशियन पेंट्स इंडस्ट्रीज, 134- डी, मालमपुर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , जिला भिंड ( म.प्र. )

8535584 28-03-03

13779

1999

ए सी स्थैतिक वाटऑबर मीटर, श्रेणी 1 और 2

मैसर्जु चेतन इंडस्ट्रीज , 67 , सेक्टर सी, रोड संख्नमा 11 , 12 एवं 13 औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , मंडीदीप, जिला रायसेन (म.प्र. )

27-03-03

8535685

1417

1999 मैसर्जु कटारिया ज्जैलर्स, 16, लक्ष्मीबाई नगर, नई दिल्ली -110023

स्वर्ध एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र भातुएँ आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एर्ष मुहरांकन

8535786 28-03-03

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहर्राकम

मैसर्जु अग्रवाल ज्वैलर्स, शॉप संख्या 4 एवं 5 , जवाहर भवन , रोशमपुर टी.टी. नगर, भोपाल -462003

8535887

3055 2 2002 31-03-03

चिकित्सा धर्मामीटर भाग 2 बंद स्केलभुमा

मैसं मेडिकेयर प्रोडक्ट्स इंक्. श्री-30 शारदापुरी, नई दिल्ली-110015

8535988

1660 1 1982 31-03-03 मैसर्जु रॉबल एप्लाघंसेज, 603/9 , जी.टी. रोड, सिंडीकेट बैंक के सामने , शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110032

पिटवा ऐल्युमिनियम के बर्तन : भाग 1 भोजन पकाने , टेबल, परोसने , भंडारण करने और बेक करने के बर्तम

8536081

1741

1960

लैटेक्स फॉम के रबड़ के उत्पाद

01-04-03 मैसर्जु अमृत वर्षा पोन इंडस्ट्रीज ( यूनिट II ) 24/23, गली नं . 4 , लिबासपुर, समयपुर बादली औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , दिल्ली-110042 2417

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8536182 01-04-03 मैस कोर्डस केबल इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , बी.1 /ई-5, मोहन को. ऑपरेटिव औद्योगिक इस्टेट, मथुरा रोड, नई दिल्ली-110044 8536283 01-04-03 मैसर्जु पर्फेक्ट पम्प्स प्रा. लि. , 75/29, मक्सी रोड, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, उज्जैन (म.प्र. )

8536384 01-04-03 मैसर्जु पैरामाउंट सर्लिमेड लि. , ए-106, रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भिवाडी-301019 जिला-अलवर ( राजस्थान) 8536485 28-03-03 मैसं समरकिंग इलैक्ट्रिकल्स प्रा. लि. , ई-1833, कविनगर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , गजियाबाद ( उ. प्र. )

8536586 02-04-03 मैस जैन इलैक्ट्रिबल्स, बी-9 , सरदार नगर, सी. सी. कालोनी के पीछे, दिल्ली110009

04-04-03

8536687

मैसर्जु नव भारत स्टील्स, प्लॉट नं .2470/1/1, मंगोलपुरकलां, दिल्ली-110085

8536788 04-04-03 मैस नव भारत स्टील्स, प्लॉट नं.2470/1/1, मंगोलपुर कलां, दिल्ली-110085

04-04-03

8536889

मैस नव भारत स्टील्स, प्लॉट नं.2470/1/1 , मंगोलपुर कलां, दिल्ली-110085

04-04-03

8536990

मैसर्जु यश इंडस्ट्रीज , एन 1-41 , रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, गीगल, जिला-अजमेर, (राजस्थान)

1496GI/2004-12

1990

694

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधी केबल

10805

1986 कृषि पम्पिंग तंत्रों के लिये अवधूषण लाइनों में प्रयुक्त किये जाने वाले पाद वाल्व, रिफ्लक्स वाल्व अथवा नॉन रिटर्न वाल्व और बोर वाल्व

1995

3319

शल्यक्रिया हेतु विलगंमीय ब्लेड (बार्ड पार्कर टाइप ) और हत्थे

2/खंड 3 1992

302

घरेलू और समान बिजली के साधित्रों की सुरक्षा भाग 2 विशेष अपेक्षाएँ खंड 3 बिजली की इस्तरी

1987

11951

डेजर्ट कूलर के पम्प सेट

1994

14105

गहराई से पानी निकालने के हाथ पम्प-घटक-स्टैनलैस स्टील

1994

14102

गहराई से पानी निकालने के हाथ पम्प-घटक-सीसेदार रांगा कौसा

1994

14104

गहराई से पानी निकालने के हाथ पम्प-घटक-नाइट्राइल रखंड

1991

10908

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस के लिए नम्यरबड़ की नलिका 2418

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

7 8537083 04-04-03

694

1990

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैसर्जु अॅकार्ड केबल्स, बी ए -79, दूसरा तल, मंगोलपुरी औद्योगिकक्षेत्र. फेज 2, दिल्ली-110034

8537184 04-04-03

9968

1988

इलास्टोमर रोधी केबल भाग 1 1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टताकेलिए

मैस पारस पालिकेब (प्रा ) लि. , खसरा संख्या 41/16, नांगलोई विस्तार , राशन ऑफिस वाली गली, नजफगढ़रोड़ नांगलोई, दिल्ली -110081

8537285

1534

08-04-03

1 1977

प्रतिदीप्ति लैम्पों के चोक भाग 1 स्विच स्टार्ट परिपथों के लिए

मैस एलाइड इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, के 90, उद्योग नगर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र रोहतकरोड़, दिल्ली-110041

8537386 08-04-03

2002.

4246

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैसों के साथ प्रयुक्तघरेलूगैसके चूल्हे

मैसर्जु एम. के. एप्लायंसेज, के-25/1 , गली नं.20 , वेस्टघोंडा, दिल्ली-110053

8537487 09-04-03

2347

1995

घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर

मैस लोगानी एप्लायंसेज, ए-12, एल.एस.सी. पदम नगर, किशन गंज, दिल्ली-110007

8537588 08-04-03

3854

1997

घरेलूऔर समान प्रयोजनों के लिएस्विच

मैस एस . आर. स्विचगीयर, एफ-34/ 2, ओखला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज- II, नई दिल्ली-110020

8537689 08-04-03

1534 1. 1977

प्रतिदीप्ति बत्तियों के चोक भाग I 1 स्विच स्टार्ट परिपथों के लिए

मैस रेमको इंडस्ट्रीज, डी-36, फ्लेटेड फैक्टरी काम्लैक्स, झंडेवालां, नईदिल्ली -110055

8537789 08-04-03

1161

1998

संरचना प्रयोजनों के लिये इस्पात की नलिकाएँ

मैसर्जु कुनाल पाइप्स ( इंडिया ) प्रा. लि. , 6,बोराईग्रोथ सेंटर, डकाघरा - रसमादा, जिला-दुर्ग ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

8537891 08-04-03

10908

1991

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस के लिये नम्य रबड़ की नलिका

मैसर्जु मालवा रबड़ फैक्टरी, गांव लोहारी, तहसील जाओग जिला रतलाम ( म.प्र. )

8537992 10-04-03

3854

1997

घरेलूऔर समान प्रयोजनों के लिएस्विच

मैसर्जु अंकेश इंडस्ट्रीज , 1/11469-70, गली नं. 4 सुभाष पार्कविस्तार, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110032 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8538085

17-04-03 मैसर्ज सोमेक्स ( इंडिया) एफ-64, रीको इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, नीमराना, जिला अलवर (राजस्थान )

8538186

17-04-03 मैस जय पाइप प्रोडक्ट्स, एफ-939, रोड नं. 14 आर, वीके आई एरिया, जयपुर-302013 (राजस्थान)

8538287

16-04-03 मैसर्ज वी के इलेक्ट्रिकल्स, बी-312, सुदर्शन पार्क, नई दिल्ली-110091 8538388

17-04-03 मैस ऑरसंस होम एप्लायंसेज, 26, संजय नगर, गुलाबी बाग, दिल्ली-110007 8538489

17-04-03 मैस ऑरसंस होम एप्लायंसेज, 26, संजय नगर, गुलाबी बाग, दिल्ली-110007 8538590

21-04-03 मैसर्ज जय गोपाल इंजी. वर्क्स ( प्रा ) लि. , प्लाट नं. 518 , एफ आई ई, पटपड़गंज, दिल्ली-110092 8538691

21-04-03 मैस समरकिंग इलैक्ट्रिकल्स प्रा. लि. , ई -183, कवि नगर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

8538792

22-04-03 मैसर्जु ज्योति रबड़ उद्योग ( इंडिया) लि. , ए-108, सेक्टर सी, नौएडा (उ.प्र ) गौतम बुद्ध नगर-201301 22-04-03

8538893

मैस श्री पदमावति इरिगेशंस प्रा.लि. , डाकघर संख्या 35, बहादुरपुर रोड, बुरहानपुर-450331 8538994

22-04-03 मैसर्जु सत्यम फूड स्पेशियलिटीज' प्रा.लि. , हरमदा चांदवाजी बाई पास, तार-पोखरवाला, तहसील : आमेर, जिला-जयपुर ( राजस्थान) 23-04-03

8539087

मैसर्जु गौरव ल्यूमिनेयर प्रा.लि., 4/40, साइट 4, औद्योगिक, क्षेत्र, साहिबाबाद, गाजियाबाद (उ.प्र. )

2419

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

7-.

7098 1

1988 क्रॉसलिंक वाले पोलीईथाइलीन विद्युत रोषी पी वी सी चढ़े केबल : भाग 1 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये

1592

1989 एस्बेसटस सीमेंट दाम पाइप

374

1979 बिजली के छत पंखें और रेगुलेटर

8978

1992 तत्काल पानी गर्माने के बिजली के हीटर

1993

2082

अचल भंडारण टाइप पानी गर्माने केबिजली के हीटर

3224

2002 संपीडित गैस के सिलिंडर, द्रवित पैट्रोलियम गैस ( एल पी जी ) के सिलिंडरों को छोड़कर, की वाल्व फिटिंग

366

1991:

बिजली की इस्तरियाँ

5137

1990 सीमेंट की ग्राउटिंग के लिये रबड़ काहौज

14151 2

1999 सिंचाई उपस्कर छिड़काव यंत्र के पाइप - भाग 2:शीघ्र युग्मित पॉलिईथाइलीन के पाइप

1998

14543

प्रकजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा )

1967

2312

नोदक टाइप एसी संवातन पंखे 2420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8539188

23-04-03

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 4

11951

1987

डेजर्ट कूलर के पम्पसेट

मैसर्जु मधुबन इंटरप्राइजेज, 56 , मालीवाड़ा, वसंतरोड, गाजियाबाद-201001

8539289

23-04-03 मैस जयदेव कास्टएलॉयज प्रा.लि. , ई-301 , फेज- II , उद्योग विहार, श्रीगंगानगर-334002

8539390

24-04-03 मैस रैनी इंटरप्राइजेज, 65, औद्योगिक इस्टेट, देवबंद, सहारनपुर, (उ.प्र.) - 247554

8539491

24-04-03 मैस नवभारत स्टील्स, प्लॉट नं . 24, 70/1/1 , मंगोलपुरी कलां, दिल्ली-110087

8539592

24-04-03 मैसर्ज कैलाश डैयरी लिमिटेड (यूनिट-2 ) रिठानी दिल्ली रोड, मेरठ ( उ.प्र. )

8539693

21-04-03 मैसर्जु साहस इंडस्ट्रीज , के-214, साइट V, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सूरजपुर, ग्रेटर नौएडा (उ.प्र. )

8539794

24-04-03 मैसर्जविशाल पाइप्स लि. , (यूनिट II ) , ए-71 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सिकंदराबाद, जिला- बुलंदशहर (उ.प्र. ) 8539895

25-04-03 मैसर्ज वैभव इंडस्ट्रीज, 41/28, साइट- II , साहिबाबाद औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, साहिबाबाद, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. ) 8539996

23-04-03 मैस इंडिया मैटल वर्क्स, खसरा नं. 65, गांव शाहबाद दौलपुर, दिल्ली-110042

8540072

30-04-03 मैस इंडियन रेलवे केटरिंग एंड टूरिज्म कार्पो. उत्तरी रेलवे वायरलेस स्टेशन क्षेत्र, नांगलोई बस डिपो के सामने, रोहतक रोड, नांगलोई, दिल्ली - 110041 8540173

25-04-03 मैसर्जु अशोक इंडस्ट्रीज , एफ-143, रोड सं. 07 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बिंदायक, जयपुर - 302012

1879

1987

धातवर्ध्य ढलवाँ लोहे की पाइप फिटिंग

1989

सामान्य प्रयोजन के लिए प्लाईवुड 303

1994

14103

गहराई से पानी निकालने के हाथ पम्प-घटक- मृदु इस्पात

13334 1

1998

मलाई रहित दूध पाउडर, भाग-1 मानिक ग्रेड

2082

1993

अचल भंडारण टाइप पानी गर्माने के बिजली के हीटर

4985

2000

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिये गैर प्लास्टिकृत पी वी सी पाइप

1998

14543

पैकजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा )

1534 1

1977

प्रतिदीप्ति बत्तियों के चौक : भाग 1 स्विच स्टार्ट परिपथों के लिये

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

7098 1

1988

क्रॉसलिंक वाले पोलीईथाइलीन रोधी पी वी सी चढ़े केबल : भाग 1-1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टताके लिये 2421

भारतका राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

29-04-03

8540274

मैस बेहाती केबल इंडस्ट्रीज, 340 ए/4, पहला तल, गली नं. 1 ए, फ्रैंड्स कालोनी, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जी.टी. रोड, शाहदरा दिल्ली - 110032 30-04-03

8540375

मैस रैनी इंटरप्राइजेज, 65, इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, रेलवे रोड, देवबंद, सहारनपुर (उ.प्र.) - 247554 01-05-03

8540476

मैस के. एल. इक्यूपमेंट्स, बी-282, मंगोलपुरी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज I , नई दिल्ली 110085 30-04-03

8540577

मैस पाइन प्लाईवुड प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, एस पी 812/बी-3, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र फेज- II, पी ओ भिवाडी, जिला अलवर (राजस्थान ) 01-05-03

8540678

मैस दर्या इंडस्ट्रियल पालिमर्स (प्रा) लि. , 56 एवं 56ए, ग्रामीण औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, लोनी, जिला गाजियाबाद (उ.प्र. )

8540779

01-05-03 मैसर्जु एक्सिस केबल्स प्रा. लि. , 4/9, साइट 4, साहिबाबाद औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , गाजियाबाद (उ.प्र. ) 05-05-03

8540880

मैस यूरो पाइप फिटिंग्स, हापुड़ रोड, फफूंदा गांव के पास, मेरठ ( उ.प्र. )

05-05-03

8540981

मैसर्जु पौल मैन्युफैक्चरिंग कं. , सी-278 , फेज- II , मायापुरी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, नई दिल्ली 110064 05-05-03

8541074

मैसर्ज गिलार्ड रेडियो प्रोडक्ट्स (प्रा) लि. , 256, चांद नगर, नई दिल्ली 110018

कार्यालयः 298 , चांद नगर, 8541175

06-05-03 मैस कुकरेजा इंडस्ट्रीज, 20- बी, लाइट इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, भिलाई

7 4

1990

694

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी

केबल

1990

1659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

2002

4246

द्रवित पैट्रोलियम गैसों के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू गैस के कूल्हे

1328

1996 परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

1996

3735

रबड़ के तल्ले वाले केनवस के जूते

1990

694

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधी केबल

1987

1879

धातवर्ध्य ढलवाँ लोहे की पाइप फिटिंग

14625

1999 प्लास्टिक भरण बोतलें

1997

3854

घरेलूऔर समान प्रयोजनों के लियेस्विच

1,991

13183

ऐल्युमिनियम रंग रोगन , उष्मा 2422

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

7 8541276

06-05-03

1999

14151

मैसर्जु मोहित पालिटेक प्रा. लि. , एफ-139, रोड नं. 6, रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, बिंदायक, जयपुर

8541377

06-05-03

6538

1971

प्रतिस्कंदी सामग्री से बने तीन पिन प्लग

, मैस स्मार्ट केबल्स एंड कोर्ड्स प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं 94, फेज- II, बादली औद्योगिक इस्टेट, दिल्ली - 110042

8541478

09-05-03

1328

1996

परतचढी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

मैस रैनी इंटरप्राइजेज, 65, औद्योगिक इस्टेट, रेलवे रोड, देवबंद - 247554 सहारनपुर ( उ.प्र. )

8541579

12-05-03

7466

1994

प्रेशर कुकर के लिये रबड़ के गेस्केट

मैस जिंदल रबड इंडस्ट्रीज, 902/290, गली नं. 3 , शालीमार गांव , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , दिल्ली - 110052

8541680

09-05-03

1417

1999

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैस श्री मरूधर ज्वैलर्स, 19-23, अमरदीप काम्प्लैक्स, सरदारपुरा " बी" रोड, जोधपुर ( राजस्थान)

8541781

09-05-03

1993

इनैमल, आंतरिकः ( क) अवरलेपन 133 (ख) फिनिशिंग

मैस रैनबो पेंट्स एंड कैमिकल्स (प्रा) लि. , जी. - 109 , न्यूजोधपुर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, जोधपुर - 342003 (राजस्थान)

8541882

13-05-03

2553

1990

निरापद ग्लासः- भाग 1 सामान्य प्रयोजन

मैस जैना सेफ्टी ग्लास इंडस्ट्रीज, जी - 35 , बृज इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, भरतपुर - 321001 (राजस्थान)

8541983

12-05-03

3975

1999

केबलों के कवचन के लिये मृदु इस्पात के तार, रूपित तार और टेप

मैसर्ज माइको वायर्स, जी-1031 , फेज - III, रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भिवाडी - 301909

8542076

12-05-03

5382

1985

गैस मेन्स, जल मेन्स और सीवर के लिये रबड़ सीलिंग रिंग

मैस झालानी रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज, बी-304-ई, रोड नं. 15, विश्व कर्मा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, जयपुर - 302016

8542177

13-05-03

9356

1980

बूटाक्लोर पायसनीय सांद्र

मैस भारती मिनरल्स लि. , डी-23 एवं 24, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सिकंदराबाद ( उ.प्र. )

8542278

19-05-03

14724

1999

जल शोधक, परा- बैंगनी

रोगाणुनाशन वाले

मैसर्ज बाइटेक इलैक्ट्रॉनिक्स लि. , बी-74 , पहला तल, वजीरपुर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, दिल्ली - 110052 2423

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7 1

1992 14-05-03

8542379

13334

मलाई रहित दूध पाउडर, भाग 2 अतिरिक्तग्रेड

मैस मदर डेयरी फूड्स प्रोसेसिंग लि. , (इकाई- पिलखुवा डेयरी ) , 18 किमी स्टोन, गाजियाबाद - हापुड़ रोड, पिलखुवा, गाजियाबाद - 201313 (उ.प्र.)

1995

2347

19-05-03

8542480

घरेलूप्रेशर कुकर

मैस भारत होम एप्लायंसेज, 1/2110, पूर्व राम नगर, दिल्ली- 110032

1978

8944

क्लोरपाइरिफॉस पायसनीय सांद्र

8542581

19-05-03 मैस एमवाक एग्रीसाइंसेज, 38 , औद्योगिक इस्टेट, धीर खेड़ा, मेरठ ( उ.प्र. ).

2465

1984 19-05-03

8542682

मोटर वाहनों के लिए केबल

मैसं मल्होत्रा केबल्स ( प्रा ) लि. , 69/2ए, नजफगढ रोड, नई दिल्ली 110015

1999

14724

20-05-03

8542783

जल शोधक परा- बैंगनी रोगाणुनाशक सहित

मैस कुकरेजा ट्रांसफार्मर मैन्यु. कं. , ए-१, वजीरपुर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, दिल्ली-110052

13779

1990 13-05-03

8542884

ए सी स्थैतिक वाटऑवर मीटर श्रेणी 1 और 2 घ

मैसर्जु ओमेगा इलैक्ट्रानिक्स, 28 ई एवं एफ, मालवीय इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जयपुर - 302017

1993

2082

20-05-03

8542985

अचल भंडारण टाइप पानी गर्माने , केबिजली के हीटर

मैसर्ज सचदेवा मेटल वर्क्स, ए एच -7, शालीमार बाग, नई दिल्ली 110088

1987

12269

53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

8543078 12-05-03 मैसर्जु प्रगति सीमेंट प्राइवेट लि. , डाकघर झुंठा, वाया रायपुर- मारवाड़ , जिला पाली 306310

1990

1659.

19-05-03

8543179

ब्लॉकबोर्ड

मैसं श्री राधा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , ई-85 , बुलंदशहर रोड , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, गाजियाबाद 201009

1417

1999 21-05-03

8543280

मैसर्ज रघुनंदन ज्वैलर्स प्रा. लि. , जी-19-22 , आबु प्लाजा, आबु लेन, मेरठ केंट ( उ.प्र. )

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1998 8543381

23-05-03

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद 14543 प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

मैसर्ज वरूण बेवरेजेज, आजाद चौक, रामपुर, जबलपुर (म.प्र. )

1992

8978

22-05-03

8543482

तत्काल पानी गर्माने के बिजली के हीटर

मैसर्ज श्री राम एंड संस, 7531/1 , तेल मिल मार्ग, राम नगर, नई दिल्ली 110055 2424

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

7 3

5 6

8543583

21-05-03

996

1979

एक फेज लघु ए सी और यूनिवर्सल बिजली की मोटर

मैस गौरव ल्यूमिनेयर्स ( प्रा ) लि. , 4/40, साइट 4 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, साहिबाबाद, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

8543684

9968

1988

20-05-03

इलास्टोमर रोधी केबलः भाग 1 1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

मैस के ई आई इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड, एस पी 129 , फेज III , रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भिवाडी-301019 जिला - अलवर ( राजस्थान)

8543785

23-05-03

1,3,4और 8 1987 मैसं तिरूपति स्ट्रक्चरल्स लि. , ए-6/ 5 , साइट 4, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, साहिबाबाद, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

जल आपूर्ति अपेक्षाओं के लिए 7834 विलायक सीमेंट जोड़ सहित इंजेक्शन संचकित पी वी सी सकिट फिटिंग भाग 1 : सामान्य अपेक्षाएँ, भाग 3 90 डिग्री के एलबों की विशिष्ट अपेक्षाएँ, भाग 4 90 डिग्री परीक्षण की विशिष्ट अपेक्षाएँ, भाग 8 टोपियाँ की विशिष्ट अपेक्षा

26-05-03

1995 8543886

4984

जल आपूर्ति के लिये उच्च घनत्व पॉलिईथाइलीन के पाइप

मैसर्ज बालाजी इरिगेशन प्रा. लि. , एच-133-135, रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, रोड नं. 5 , रतनगढ, जिला चुरू (राजस्थान)

26-05-03

1994 8543987

13983

घरेलू प्रयोजनों के लिये स्टैनलेस इस्पात के सिंक

मैसर्ज जैन बदर्स सेनिटेशन प्रा. लि. , 12 , एस.एस.आई. इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जी.टी. करनाल रोड, दिल्ली - 110033

8544080

1999 28-05-03

13779

ए सी स्थैतिक वाटऑवर मीटर, श्रेणी 1 और 2

मैस कांटीमीटर्स एंड इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, 31, एस.एस.आई. कोऑपरेटिव इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, जी.टी. करनाल रोड, दिल्ली - 110033

8544181

26-05-03

12269

1987

53ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

मैस जगदीश कंस्ट्रक्शन प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, 134, पीपलवा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बांसवाड़ा ( राजस्थान)

2000 8544282

27-05-03

4985

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिये गैर प्लास्टिकृत पी वी सी पाइप

मैस तिरूपति ट्यूब्स (एडवांस स्टील स्ट्रिप्स ( प्रा ). लि. की इकाई ) , 50/5 , साइट IV , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, साहिबाबाद, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

8544383

27-05-03

1293

1988

250 वोल्ट और 16 एम्पीयर तक के रेटित करंट के प्लग और . सॉकेट आउटलेट

मैसर्जु इलैक्ट्रिक ऐज्ज (इंडिया ) , एम-161/1 , गली नं. 10, शास्त्रीनगर, दिल्ली- 110052

1988 8544484

10124

27-05-03 मैसर्ज लक्ष्मी पाइप्स एंड फिटिंग्स प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं. 529, सेक्टर III , पिथमपुर, धार ( म.प्र. )

पेय जल आपूर्ति के लिये संविरचित पी वी सी फिटिंग : भाग 2 सॉकेट की विशिष्ट अपेक्षाएँ 2425

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8544585 28-05-03 मैस श्री गणपति एस्बेस्टास प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, सी-31 रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, कालाडेरा, तहसील-चोमु जिला-जयपुर ( राजस्थान) 8544686 27-05-03 मैसर्ज ब्राइट मेटल वर्क्स, 11-बी, प्रीत विहार, नौचंदी ग्राउंड, मेरठ-( उ.प्र. )

8544787 28-05-03

मैसर्ज क्रॉप ग्रोथ (इंडिया ) प्रा. लि. , डी-21 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सिकंद्राबाद ( उ.प्र. ) 8544888 29-05-03 मैस ज्वैल सीमलेस लि. , प्लॉट नं. 159, सेक्टर III , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, पिथमपुर, जिला धार (म.प्र. ) 8544989 29-05-03. मैसर्जु भेरूलाल शिव रतन तोशनीवाल, नया बाजार, अजमेर - 305001 8545082 30-05-03 मैसर्ज स्वास्तिक टाइल्स, एक 660 , नॉर्थ एक्टेंशन, मत्स्यइंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, अलवर (राजस्थान) 8545183 30-05-03 मैस हाई-टेक प्रोडक्ट्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , ए-13, बी-1 , विस्तार मोहन को- ऑपरेटिव इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, बदरपुर, मथुरा रोड, नई दिल्ली 110044 8545284 29-05-03 मैसर्ज बेटेक्स इलैक्ट्रानिक्स, प्रोप. बेंटेक्स पिल्डर्स प्रा. लि. बी-66, गेट संख्या 2 , नारायणा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेज II , नई दिल्ली-110028

29-05-03

8545385

मैसर्ज स्मार्ट केबल्स एंड कोर्ड्स प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट नं. 94 , फेज II, बादली इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, दिल्ली-110042 8545486 02-06-03 मैस नवीन मैन्युफेक्चरिंग कं. , 7/201, गीता कालोनी, दिल्ली-110031 8545587 04-06-03 मैसर्ज सहारा इंडिया होम एप्लायंसेज , 26/8 , टीकरी कलां , 28 कि.मी. स्टोन, दिल्लीरोहतक रोड, दिल्ली-110041 1496 GI/2004-13

7 4

1989

1592

एस्बेस्टॉस सीमेंट दाब पाइप

4246

1992 द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैसों के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू गैस के चूल्हे

1978 क्लोरपाइरिफॉस पायसनीय सांद्र 8944

1998

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरंकन

1980

1237

सीमेंट कंक्रीट की फर्शवंदी टाइल

1990

694

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

1990

694

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये'पी वी सी रोधी केबल

1990

494

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

1987

11951

डेजर्ट कूलर के पम्प सेट

1995

2347

घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर 2426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8545688 03-06-03 मैस फाइव स्टार इलैक्ट्रिकल्स ( इंडिया ) 2452, बस्ती पंजाबियन, सब्जीमंडी, दिल्ली-110007

8545789 03-06-03 मैसर्जु फाइव स्टार इलैक्ट्रिकल्स ( इंडिया ) 2452, बस्ती पंजाबियन, सब्जी मंडी, दिल्ली-110007

8545890 05-06-03

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

3854

1997.

घरेलू और समान प्रयोजनों के लिये स्विच

1988

1293

250 वोल्ट और 96 एम्पीयर तक के रेटित करंट के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेट

1 13849

1993

सुवाष्य अग्नि शामक, शुष्क

पाउडर टाइप

मैसर्ज एस.डी. इंडस्ट्रीज ( इंडिया ), 9085 , जमीर स्ट्रीट, नवाब गंज, पुल बंगश, दिल्ली-110006

8545991 05-06-03 मैसर्जु सिद्धार्थ रबड़ इंडस्ट्री, गली नं. 1 , खसरा नं. 29/34, मास्टर मोहल्ला, लिबासपुर, दिल्ली-110042

8546084 06-06-03

19,98

9573

द्रवित पैट्रोलियम गैस ( एल पी जी) के लिए रबड़ होज

इन्डोसल्फास पायसत्तीय सांद्र

मैसर्ज भारती मिनरल्स लि. , डी-23 एवं 24, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सिकंदराबाद ( उ.प्र. )

8546185 06-06-03 मैसर्जु नॉवेक्स इलैक्ट्रिकल एप्लायंसेज, प्लॉट नं . 5, स्ट्रीट नं. 1 , मालूक सिंह मार्ग, अर्जुन नगर, नई दिल्ली -110051

8546286 06-06-03 मैसर्जु राजस्थान माइक्रो इरिगेशन सिस्टम प्रा. लि. , एफ-14, बिंदायक औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, बिंदायक, जयपुर-302092 8546387 06-06-03

4323

1980

996

1979

एक-फेज लघु एसी और यूनिवर्सल बिजली की मोटर

4984

1995

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिये उच्च घनत्व पॉलिईथाइलीन के पाइप

1328

1996

परतचढी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

मैसर्जु मोहता प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट नं . 59 , साइन नं. IV, साहिबाबाद औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, जिला : गाजियाबाद (उ. प्र. ) 8546488 10-06-03

4984

1995

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिये उच्च

घनत्व पॉलिईथाइलीन के पाइप

मैसर्जुचिनार इंडस्ट्रीज, जी-97, आई.आई.डी. , कल्लादवास, उदयपुर (राजस्थान)

8546589 10-06-03 मैसर्ज बंसल इंडस्ट्रीज, 39, जय देवी नगर, गढ रोड, मेरठ ( उ.प्र. )

694

1990

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

8546690 11-06-03 मैस आर.सी.डी. इलेक्ट्रो कंट्रोल्स, सी-176, ग्राउड फ्लोर, मायापुरी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज 2, नई दिल्ली-110064 8546791 11-06-03 मैसर्ज स्विच कंट्रोल ( इंडिया ) , 55, गोव्रिद पार्क , कृष्णा नगर, दिल्ली-110059

8546892 12-06-03 मैस नीलकंठ मेटल इंडस्ट्रीज , 40/6, गली नं . 1 , समयपुर, दिल्ली-110042

8546993 12-06-03

मैस आदर्श बेवरेजेज, जी-15, उद्योग कुंज, दिल्ली- हापुड़ बाइपास रोड, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. ) 8547086 06-06-03 मैस पसंद प्लाईवुड्स (प्रा. ) लि. , गांव: दसना, कस्बा रोड, दसना, जिला गाजियाबाद, (उ. प्र. ) 8547187 12-06-03 मैसर्ज मार्कंडेय प्लाइवुड ( प्राः ) लि. , छाजपुरा, देहरादून रोड, सहारनपुर-247001 ( उ.प्र. ) 8547288 12-06-03 मैसर्ज हर्षो स्टील्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , . ÕèwuV, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, साहिबाबाद -201010 (उ.प्र. ) 8547389 12-06-03 मैसर्जु दर्पा इंडस्ट्रियल पॉलिमर्स (प्रा. ) लि. , 56 एवं 56 - ए, ग्रामीण औद्योगिक इस्टेट, लोनी, जिला गाजियाबाद -201102 (उ.प्र. ) 8547490 13-06-03 , मैस खुराना इलेक्ट्रिकल्स, 91 , मंदिर मार्ग इंडस्ट्रियल काम्प्लैक्स, हैदर पुर, दिल्ली -110088

8547591 13-06-03 मैसर्ज खुराना इलेक्ट्रिकल्स , 91 , मंदिर मार्ग इंडस्ट्रियल काम्प्लैक्स, हैदर पुर, दिल्ली -110088

8547692 16-06-03 , मैसर्जु अजंता पालिमर्स, आई -2255, डी एस आई डी सी नरेला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, दिल्ली-110040

2427

भारत का राजपंत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

2000

12640

घरेलू तथा समान प्रयोजनों के लिए अवशिष्ट करेंट प्रचालित परिपथ वियोजक भाग 1: समेकित अधिकरेंट संरक्षण (आर सी सी बी ) रहित परिपथ- वियोजक

13947 5 खंड 1 1993 अल्प- वोल्टता स्विचगीयर और नियंत्रण गीयर- भाग - 5 : नियंत्रण परिपथ युक्तियाँ और स्विचिंग एलीमेंट खंठ 1.: विद्युतयांत्रिक नियंत्रण परियम् युक्तिला

2347

1995 घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर

14543

1998 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा)

22021 1999 लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर टाइप ) : भाग 1 प्लाईवुड के सतहयुक्त पल्ले

1659

1990 ब्लॉक बोर्ड

2000

4985

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिये गैर प्लास्टिकृत पी वी सी पाइप

1995 रबड़ के तल्ले वाले केनवस के बूट 3736

1988

1293

250 वोल्ट और 16 एम्पीयर तक के रेटित करंट के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेट

3854

1997 घरेलू और समान प्रयोजनों के लिये स्विच

1994

7231

पानी के शौचालयों और मूत्रालयों के लिये प्लास्टिक की फ्लश टंकियाँ 2428

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ]

694

8547793

1990 16-06-03

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैस पारस इंडस्ट्रीज, ए 10/1 , पहला तल, झिलमिल औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110095

1998

14543

8547894 16-06-03

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज पानी के अलावा )

मैसर्जु पर्फेक्ट बेवरेजेज ( प्रा. ) लि. , ए-268/1 , ओखला औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेज-1 , नईदिल्ली-110020

458

1988 8547995 13-06-03

पूर्वढलित कंक्रीट पाइप, प्रबलन सहित और प्रबलन रहित

मैसर्जु रॉयल इंटरप्राइजेज, 22 कि मी सीकर रोड पर, जे सी पी एल के सामने , मातूका बाँस, जयपुर ( राजस्थान)

3906

1995 8548088 17-06-03

फसल संरक्षण उपस्कर-हाथ- चालित पीठ पर लादा जाने वाला फुहारा, पिस्टन टाइप

मैस मसंद एग्रो इक्यूपमेंट (प्रा.) लि. , तेजाजी नगर चौराहा, खंडवा रोड, गांव कालोद करताल, इंदौर ( म.प्र. )

1989

303

8548189

सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए प्लाईवुड

13-06-03 मैस एस एल आर इंडस्ट्रीज (प्रा. ) लि., 7/1, साइट IV, साहिबाबाद औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110095

1990

1659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

8548290 13-06-03 मैस एस एल आर इंडस्ट्रीज (प्रा.) लि. , 7/1 , साइट IV, साहिबाबाद औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, गाजियाबाद

398

1996 8548391 17-06-03

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टतां के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैसर्जु श्री अरिहंत केबल्स, 423-424, गली नं. 7, फ्रैंड्स कालोनी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, शाहदरा, दिल्ली-110095

1990

694

8548492 18-06-03 मैसर्ज तिरूपति एल पी जी इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , ( कंडक्टर डिविजन ) औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, सेलाकुई, देहरादून (उत्तरांचल)

शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन के लिए ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक भाग 2 जस्तीकृत प्रबलित इस्पात ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक

1990 8548593 18-06-03

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता 694 के लिये प्मी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैस एन. के. मेटल्स, 47, गली नं. 6, फ्रैंड्स कालोनी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, शाहदरा, दिल्ली-110095

8500

1991 8548694 19-06-03

संरचना इस्पात सूक्ष्ममिश्रधातुयुक्त (मध्यम और उच्च सामर्थ्य गुणतो)

मैसर्ज श्रीकृष्णा रोलिंग मिल्स, (जयपुर) लिमिटेड, 37, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, झोटवाड़ा, जयपुर-302012 2429

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1999

14724

8548795 20-06-03

जल शोधक परा- बैंगनी रोगाणुनाशन वाले

मैस हाइड्रो वाल्ब्ज, सी-2/2, विजय विहार, फेज 1 , (गांव रिठाला के पास) दिल्ली-110085

1990

694

8548896 23-06-03

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये. पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैस पॉलिटेक इंडस्ट्रीज, बी-15/3 , झिलमिल औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, शाहदरा, दिल्ली-110095

1992

8978

8548997 23-06-03

तत्काल पानी गर्माने के बिजली केहीटर

मैस कक्कड़ एलीमेंट स्टोर ( रजि. ) , बी-85, जी.टी. करनाल रोड, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, दिल्ली-110033

1996

398

8549090 24-06-03

शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन के लिए ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक भाग 2 जस्तीकृत प्रबलित इस्पात के ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक

मैस रिटको ऑटोमोटिव ( इंडिया ) , प्रा. लि. , एफ-1232, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, घातल, फेज -1 , भिवाडी, जिला अलवर ( राजस्थान)

1995

2347

घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर

24-06-03

8549191

मैस आकार किचन एप्लायंसेज, 80/2, रजिंदर नगर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, मोहन नगर, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

1990

694

8549292 20-06-03

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैस रमानी पॉवर केबल्स ( प्रा ) लि. , 62/2/2, साइट IV, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, साहिबाबाद, गाजियाबाद (उ.प्र. )

1983

1038

8549393 20-06-03

इस्पात के दरवाजे, खिड़कियां और संवातक

मैस प्रिसिजन कलपुर्जा उद्योग प्रा.लि. , 46, रजिंदर नगर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, मोहन नगर, गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

1990

694

26-06-03

8549494

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वी सी रोधी केबल

मैस गोल्डन कैब इंडस्टीज , प्लॉट नं. 447 , पटपड़गंज इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, दिल्ली-110092

1999

1489

26-06-03

8549595

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट : भाग 1 फ्लाई ऐश से बनी

मैसर्जु ग्रासिम इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड, (व्हाइट सीमेंट डिविजन) डाकघर: खरिया खंगार, भोपाल गढ़ , जिला: जोधपुर ( राजस्थान )

1999

14151

26-06-03

8549696

छिड़काव यंत्र के पाइप- भाग 2 : शीघ्र युग्मित पॉलिईथाइलीन के पाइप

मैस जे.वी. इरिगेशन सिस्टम्स प्रा.लि. , जी 1-68, चोपंकी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, डाकघर: तापुकारा, भिवाडी, जिला: अलवर ( राजस्थान)

1998

7098

8549797 26-06-03 मैस सूरज केबल्स, सी-412, 413 ग्राउंड फ्लोर, दिल्ली-110040

क्रासलिंक वाले पॉलिईथाइलीन रोधी पीवीसी खेलदार केबल: भाग 1 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वाल्ठता के लिये

1990

694

27-06-03

8549801

1100 वो तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पी वीं सी रोधी केबल

मैस श्री मानक केबल इंडस्टीज, 360/367 , दूसरा तल, गली नं. 3 , फ्रैंड्स कालोनी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जी.टी. रोड, शाहदरा , दिल्ली-110095

1984

5950

शाट फायरिंग केबल

8549902 30-06-03 मैसर्जु भदोरा इंडस्ट्रीज, 4, एस.यू. इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, ढोंगा, टीकमगढ़ ( म.प्र. )

[सं. सी.एम.डी.- IV/13 : 11 ]

एस. के. चौधरी , उप महानिदेशक ( युहर ) 2430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 14th May, 2004

S.O. 1206. In pursurance of sub -regulation (5) of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulation 1988 of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particular of which are given in the following schedule.

Title of the standard

IS No Part/ Sec Year Licence No.

Operative Date

Name and address (Factory) oftheParty

7 8509785 01-10-02

3055 01 01 1994

Clinical thermometer Part 1: Solid stem type

M/sMedicare Products Inc B- 30 , Sharda Puri, New Delhi - 110015

8509886 30-09-2002

2396

1988

Rubber hose for fuel dispensing

M/ s Padmini Industries Ltd. , Village Demdahera, P.O. Khekra Baghpat (U.P)

8509987 04-10-2002

3055 01

1994

Clinical thermometer Part 1: Solid stem type

M/ sG.S & Company, 128 -C , Race Course , Dehradun (Uttaranchal )

8510063 07-10-2002

1417

1999 M/ s Padmini Abhushan Bhandar, Near Gole Pyou, Naya Bazar Ajmer (Rajasthan)

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/Artefacts Fineness and Marking

8510164 07-10-2002

02 3 1992 M/sPearl Appliances Pvt . Ltd A- 84 , G.T Karnal Raod, Industrial Area Delhi- 110033

Safety ofhousehold and similar electrial appliances: :part 2 Particular require- ments : Section 3 Electrical iron 302

8510265 08-10-2002

1960

1741

Latex foam rubber products

M/ s Sapna Rubber Industrial H - 1-1212 C. Phase V, Industrial Area, Bhiwadi Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan)

8510366 03-10-2002

1999

2062

Steel for general structural purposes

M/ sGanpati Industrial Pvt. Ltd. , Plot No. 65 & 66, Sector C, Urla Industrial Area, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

8510467 08-10-2002

8931

1993 M/s Dhawan Sanitary Udyog, T-29/N - 4 , Janta Park, Baljeet Nagar, New Delhi - 110008

Copper alloy fancy single taps , combination tap assembly and stop valves for water services

8510568 07-10-2002

13779

1999

as static watthour meters , class 1 and class 2

M/ sHavells India Ltd. , 6 Tilak Nagar Industrial Area, New Delhi - 110018

8510669 07-10-2002

7809

1 1986 M/ sJaintex Industries , 30/47, street No. 9 , Vishwas Nagar, Shahdara Delhi - 110032

pressure sensitive adhesive insulating tapes for electrical taps for electrical purposes Part 3 Requirements for indi- vidual materials Section 1 : Plasticised polyvinylchloride tapes with non-thermosetting adhesive 2431

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठं 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ].

6 1

1995

2347

04-10-2002

8510770

Domestic pressure cookers

M/s . P. M. Industries, 40, Rajinder Nagar Indu- strial Area, Mohan Nagar Ghaziabad (U.P. )

694

1988 04-10-2002

8510871

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/ s . Bhansali Cables & Conductors Pvt . Ltd. , B-816, RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi, Distt. Alwar(Rajasthan)

1998 8510972 04-10-2002

1554

PVC insulated (HD ) electric cables Part 1: For working Voltages upto and including 1100V

M/s . Bhansali Cables & Conductors Pvt . Ltd. , B-816, RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi . Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan)

4246

1992 8511065 09-10-2002

Domestic gas stove for use with liquefied petroleum gases

M/s . J.K. Home Appliances , 27/96/2 , IInd Floor, Jawala Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi - 110032

1987

446

09-10-2002

8511166

Rubber air hose

M/s . Vardhaman Hoses Pvt. Ltd. , E 1249 , Phaseshatal) RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi , Distt Alwar (Rajasthan)

694

1990 10-10-2002

8511267

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/s . Pareek Cables , 340- A/4 , Gali No. 1A, Friends Colony Indl . Area, Shahdara, Delhi - 110032

1978

418

10-10-2002

8511368

Tungsten filament general service electric lamps

M/s. Shri Geetanjali Lamps- Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 11 /A, Electronic Complex Pardesipura, Indore 452010

2001

4270

16-10-2002

8511469

Steel Tubes used for water :wells

M/s . Garg Ispat Udyog Ltd. , G-459-62, Industrial Area, Bhiwadi , Distt Alwar (Rajasthan )

1992 17-10-2002

8511570

13487

Irrigation Equipmentemitters

M/ s . Pioneer Plastic Industries Ltd. , A- 130, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase II , New Delhi - 110020

1996 16-10-2002

8511671

Three-phase induction 325 motors

M/s. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. , Opposite Railway Station, Ujjain Road, Dewas (M.P)

1999

14625

17-10-2002

8511772

Plastics feedings bottles

M/s. Bonne Care Pvt . Ltd. , E-27, S.M.A Cooperative Industrial Estate , G.T. Karnal Road, Delhi - 110033

1989

303

16-10-2002

8511873

Plywood for general purposes

M/s. D.K. Plywood Ltd. , G- 1/415-416, Industrial Area, Bhiwadi, Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan) 2432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SBC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

7 8511974 03-10-2002

1417

1999 M/s . Jhelum Jewellers 2652, Bank Street , Karol Bagh , New Delhi - 11005

Gold and gold alloys jewellery/Artefacts Fineness and Marking

8512067 18-10-2002

8749

BioGas Stove

1988 M/s . Malhotra Engineering Co. Pvt . Ltd. , 572 B, Gali Bhooton Wali, Nangloi , New Delhi - 110041

8512168 18-10-2002

3564

1995

Hydraulically regulated doorclosers

M/s. Kevadiya Mechanical Works (Regd. ) A- 1 /A-2 , D.S.F.D.C. Complex Shani Bazar Road Sultan Puri , Delhi - 110041

21-10-2002

8512269

8960

1978

Methyl Parathion DustingPowder

M/s. Asian Agro Indiustries A-129 (M) , Road No. 9C, Vishwakarma Industrial Area Jaipur-302013

8512370 18-10-2002

7620

01 1986

Diagnostic medical X-ray EquipmentPart 1 : Genera safety requirements

M/ s .Medford Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd. , GI - 50 , RIICOP Industrial Area, Road No. 2 -C , Bindayaka, Jaipur -302013

8512471 22-10-2002

Blockboards

1659

1990 M/s. Bharat Wood Crafts Kh . No. 16/13 , Min ( 1-05) 16/14 Min ( 0-09) , Kh . No. 16 Kh. No. 16/13 , Min (1-13 ), Shahbad Daulatpur, Delhi- 110042

8512572 22-10-2002

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/s . Rathi Polymers Pvt . Ltd. 458/466 , Gali No. 8 , Friends Colony Indl . Area, G.T. Road, Shahdara, Delhi - 110095

8512673 22-10-2002

1417

1999 M/ s . Vijay Kumar Jewellers 2817 , Ajmal Khan Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi - 110005

Gold and gold Alloys, Jewellery/Artefacts Fineness and Marking

8512774 21-10-2002

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/ s. Mogra Cables & Conductors No. 10 , DSIDC Complex, Jhilmil Indl . Area, Shahdara , Delhi - 110095

22-10-2002

8512875

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/s. Pooja Industries, 340/4 - A, Friends Colony Industrial Area, Gali No. 1 -B, G. T. Road, Shahadara , Delhi - 110095

8512976 24-10-2002

1989

Plywood for general purposes 303

M/s . Bharat Wood Craft Kh . No. 16/13 , Min (1-05 ) 16/14 Min (0-09 ), Kh . No. 16/13 , Kh . No. 16/13 , Min (1-13), Shahbad Daulatpur, Delhi- 110042 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2433

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

8513069 24-10-2002 M/s. Prince Diamond Jewellers , 4, Park End, Vikas Marg, Delhi-110092

8513170 25-10-2002 M/s. Vijaypal Industries , WZ 1B/9 , New Sahib Pura, MBS Nagar, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi - 110018 28-10-2002

8513271

M/s. Ganpati Plywood, B - 95 (G) , RIICO Industrial Area, Sikar- 332001 (Rajasthan) 851337228-10-2002 M/s. Gupta Refractories , 11, Maharajpura, Gwalior 74005 8513473 28-10-2002 M/s. Gupta Refractories, 11,Maharajpura, Gwalior-474005 8513574 28-10-2002 M/s. Shakti Udyog, 100/28 , Village Razapur, Rohini , Sector 9 , Delhi - 110085

8513675 30-10-2002 M/sAdarsh Cable Industries WZ-3 , DLF Industrial Area, Basai Darapur Road, Moti Nagar, New Delhi - 110015

8513776 30-10-2002 M/s . Kevin Merdia Cab In- dustries , 317 , F. I. E. Patparganj , Delhi - 110092 8513877 30-10-2002 M/s. Seaways Industries , Khasra No. 665, Nawada village, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi - 110059

8513978 30-10-2002 M/s. D. K. Plywood (P) Ltd. , G-1/415-416, Industrial Area, Bhiwadi -301019 Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan) 8514071 30-10-2002 M/s . Naman Rubber Industries , Plot No. 106 D , Sector B , Industrial Estate , Sirgitti , Bilaspur ( Chhattisgarh) 8514172 30-10-2002 M/s. J.V. M. Plywood Pvt . Ltd. , E-42A, F-88 (A) and F-88 (B) , RIICO Industrial Area, Baghru (Extn. ) Jaipur 1496 GI/2004-14

1417

1999 Gold and Gold Alloys, Jewellery/Artefacts Fineness and Marking

9301

1990 Deepwell handpumps

1989

303

Plywood for general purposes

1988

5531

Cast iron specials for asbestos -cement pressure pipes for water gas and sewages

1538

1993 Castiron fittings for pressure pipes for water, gas and sewage

7809 03 01 1986 Pressure sensitive adhesive insulating tapes for electrical purposes Part 3 requirements for individual material Section 1 Plasticized poly- vinylchloride tapes withnon- thermosetting adhesive

2465

1984 Cables for motor vehicles

694

1990 PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

7466

1994 Rubber gaskets for pressure cookers

1999

2202

Wooden flush door shutters ( solid core type) Part 1:Plywood face pannel

1999

5557

Industrial and safety rubber kneeboots

1990

1659

Blockboards 2434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8514273 30-10-2002 M/s . Diamond World 417, Bhera Enclave, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi - 110087 8514374 30-10-2002 M/ s . Kansal Metal Industries Khasra No. 299 , Gali No. 26, Opp .Authority Road , Village Gokulpur , Delhi - 110094 8514475 30-10-2002 M/s. Pal Metal Works, Village Tahirpur, A- 56 , Near G.T.B. Hospital Shahadara, Delhi - 110095

8514576 31-10-2002 M/ s. Safe Products Safe Enclave, Khamardis , Shankar Nagar , Kachana Road, P.O. Saddu , Raipur (M.P. )

8514677 31-10-2002 M/ s. S.R Pharmaceuticals Shri Ram Nikunj , Station Road, Mithu Bada, Shahdol -484001 (Μ.Ρ. ) 8514778 31-10-2002 M/s . National Electricals India, 4009, Gali Ahiran, Bahadurgarh Road, Delhi - 110006 8514879 31-10-2002 M/s. National Electricals India , 4009, Gali Ahiran, Bahadur Garh Road, Delhi - 110006.

8514980 31-10-2002

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 4

1417

1999

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

2347

Domestic Pressure Cooker

1995

2347

1995

Domestic Pressure Cooker

14543

1998

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

1997

1061

Disinfectant fluids phenolic type

3854

1997

Switches for domestic and similar purposes

1293

1988

Plugs and sockets outlets of 250 volts and rated current upto 16 amperes

1659

1990

Blockboards

M/s . D. K. Plywood Pvt . Ltd. , G-1/415-416 , Industrial Area , Bhiwadi - 301019 , Distt . Alwar 8515073 31-10-2002 M/ s. JVM Plywood E -42 (A) , F - 88 (A) , F - 88 (B), RIICO Industrial Area , Baghru Extn . Jaipur, Jaipur

8515174 31-10-2002 M/s . Monarch Surgical Industries , 62, DSIDC , Okhla Industrial Area, Scheme - I , Phase II , New Delhi - 110020

05-11-2002

8515275

M/ s. Mohan Jute Mills Ltd. , Sarangarh Road, Raigarh ( Chhattisgarh) 8515376 05-11-2002 M/ s. HPL Protection Technologies Pvt Ltd. , F 90/26 , Okhla Industrial Area, Phase 1 , New Delhi - 110020

8515477 07-11-2002

Mainapur Paraganas , Jalalabad , M/ s . AM.X. Medical Systems , Plot No 74, Khasra No. 19, Village Mahiuddin Pur,

1989

303

Plywood for general purposes

7080 03

MTP suction apparatus , Part 3 Electrically operated

12650

1997

Textiles-Jute bags for packing 50 kg foodgrains

8828

1996

Electrical accessories- Circuit breakers för overhead current protection for household and similar installations

762001

9861

Diagnostic Medical X - ray equipment - Part 1: General and safety requirements [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

08-11-2002

8515578

(Aunit of JKJ and sons endeavour Pvt . Ltd. ) 2719 , Bank Street, Karol Bagh , New Delhi - 110005 M/s . JKJ and Sons Jewellers , 08-11-2002

8515679

M/s . Rungta Irrigation Ltd. , C- 165 , B.S. Road, Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 08-11-2002

8515780

M/s . Pooja Shree , 198 , Hammal Nagar , Indore-452007 (MP) 8515881 11-11-2002 M/s . Chhabra Cable Industries , 473 , (Basement) , F.I.E .... Patparganj Industrial Area, Delhi- 110092 11-11-2002

8515982

M/s . Amba Industries , C- 156, Bulandshahar Road Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 11-11-2002

8516075

M/s. Harnaam Singh Bishan- Singh Jewellers (Pvt. ) Ltd. , 1334-35 , Chandni Chowk, Delhi - 110006

12-11-2002

8516176

M/s . Mahamaya Jewellers , 2215, Hardhyan Singh Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi - 110005

07-11-2002

8516277

M/s . Vardhman Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. , 6 Km stone , Dehradun- Saharanpur Road , Village Kumharhera, Saharanpur (U.P. )

14-11-2002

8516378

M/ s. Biotech International Ltd. , A-30, Sector 8 , Noida , Gautam Budh Nagar - 201301 14-11-2002

8516479

M/ s. Cornfield Edichem (P) Ltd. , 30 -A, K- 2 Block, Nihal Vihar, Nangloı , Delhi - 110041 14-11-2002

8516580

M/s . Saurabh Engineering Works , T- 29/ 1 , Baljeet Nagar, Road No. 20, Opposite 30/40, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi - 110008 14-11-2002

8516681

M/ s , Jain Wire Industries, 34, Industrial Estate Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh )

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926-

999

1417

jewellery /artefacts Gold and gold alloys , Fineness and marking

12818

1992 Unplasticised PVC screen and casing pipes for bore/ tubewell

145430

Packaged drinking water (other than packagedii natural mineral water )

1990

6941

PVC insulured cablesVár working voltages υριο and including 1100 Misg

1990

1659

Blockboards

1417

1999 Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/artefacts Fineness and marking

1999

1417

Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/artefacts Fineness and marking

2000:

4985

Unplasticized PVC pipes for potable water supplies

2001

14953

Textiles - Polyester or polymide mosquito nets

1998

14543

Packaged drinking water ( other than packaged natural mineral water)

1994

779

Water meters (domestic type)

1994

398

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part 4 Aluminium alloy stranded conductors (aluminium magnesium -silicon type) 2436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8516782 18-11-2002 M/s. Royal Refrigeration & Electrical Engineers, B-90, Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase- 1 , New Delhi - 110064 8516883 18-11-2002 M/ s . Evershine Paint & Chemical Industries, W-19 , Okhla Industrial Area, Phase- II , New Delhi - 110020 8516984 18-11-02 M/s . Madhuban Enterprises , 56, Maliwara, Vasant Road, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

8517077 20-11-2002 M/ s. Himgiri Beverages, J-1-26 , Ist Phase ; Sangaria Mini Growth Centre , Jodhpur- 342005 , (Rajasthan) 8517178 20-11-2002 M/ s. Rajasthan Micro Irrigation Systems Pvt. Ltd. , F- 14, RIICO Industrial Area, Bindayaka, Jaipur

8517279 20-11-2002 M/s. R. K. Foods, A- 129, Industrial Area, Phase II , Okhla, New Delhi - 110021 8517380 20-11-2002 M/ s . UnityMetal Crafts Ring Road No. 2 , Industrial Area, Bhanpuri , Birgaon, (C.G. ) 8517481 20-11-2002 M/ s . Om Sai Pumps Spares Pvt. Ltd. , 39 A, Sector ' C ' , Industrial Area, Mandideep , Distt . Raisen (Μ.Ρ. )

8517582 20-11-2002 M/ s . Naman Rubber Industries Plot No. 106 -D , Sector B , Industrial Estate, Sirgitti , Bilaspur (C.G. ) 8517683 20-11-2002

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

1992

1391

Room air conditioners-Part 2 : Splitair conditioners

133

1993

Enamel, Interior: (a) Undercoating (6) Finishing

996

1979

Single phase small AC and universal electric motors

14543

1998

Packaged dringkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)

14151 02

1999

Irrigation Equipment- Sprinkler Pipes-Part 2 Quick coupled polyethylene pipes

14543

1998

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

398

1996

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part 2 Aluminium conductors , galvanised steel reinforced

14102

1994

Deepwell handpumps- Components -Leaded tin bronze

3736

Canvas boots , rubber sole

1995

13287

1992

ExtraDeepwell

handpumps

M/ s . Nav Bharat Steels , Plot No. 24, 70/1/1 , Mangolpur Kalan , Delhi - 110085 8517784 20-11-2002 M/s . Evergreen Industries , Khasra No. 299, Street No. 9 , Village Gokulpur, Wazirabad Road, Delhi - 110094 8517885 20-11-2002 M/s . Summerking Electricals (P) Ltd. , E- 183 , Kavinagar Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 8517986 18-11-2002 M/ s. Paras Enterprises , 42, Umesh Vihar , T.P. Nagar, Meerut (U.P. )

7466

1994

Rubber gaskets for pressure cookers

374

1979

Electric ceiling type fans and regulators

3831

1979

Sterlizer shallow (dressing drum) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ] '

2437

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/क्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

8518079 22-11-2002

8541

1993

Floor polish, for floor and wooden furniture

M/ s. Sleen Water Proof Com- pound Pvt . Ltd. , F-9B, Old RIICO, Industrial Area, Dholpur -328001 Rajasthan

25-11-2002

8518180

Blockboards

1659

1990 M/ s. Ganpati Plywood, B-95 (G) , RIICO Industrial Area , Sikar - 332001

8518281 25-11-2002

8960

1978

Methyl parathion dusting powders-

M/s . Sri Krishna Pesticides, A-335 -E- 1 , Road No. 17, Vishwa Karma Industrial Area, Jaipur- 302013

21-11-2002

8518382

1967

2312

Propeller type ač ventilating fans

M/ s: Madhuban Enterprises , 56 , Maliwara,.Vasant Road , Ghaziabad (U.P. )

8518483 25-11-2002

302 02 201 1992 M/s.Aggarwal Home Appliances, 307/4, Gali No. 4, Ashok Mohalla, Nangloi , New Delhi - 110041

Safety of household and similar electrical appliances; Part 2 particular requirements, Sec 201 、 Electric immersion water heater

368

8518584 25-11-2002

1992

Electric immersion water heater

M/ s . Aggarwal Home Appliances, 307/4 , Gali No. 4, Ashok Mohalla, Nangloi , New Delhi - 110041

25-11-2002

4159

8518685

1983

Mineral filled sheathed heating elements

M/s. Aggarwal Home Appliances, 307/4 , Gali No. 4 , Ashok Mohalla, Nangloi , New Delhi - 110041

25-11-2002

374

8518786

1979

Electric ceiling type fans and regulators

M/ s. Asylum Switchgears, 26/13 , Ganga Sahai Colony, Mandoli , Delhi - 110093

1998 8518887 26-11-2002

14543

Packaged drinking water ( other than packaged natural mineral water)

M/s . Mountain Blue Water Ltd. , Plot No. - 1-117 , Site C, Surajpur , UPSIDC, Greater Noida , Gautam Budh Nagar (U.P. )

2312

1967 8518988 28-11-2002

Propeller type ac ventilating fans

M/s. Raj Electricals, 214, Functional Industrial Estate Patparganj , Delhi - 110092

8074

1990 28-11-2002

8519081

Monocrotophos SL

M/s . Insecticides (India) Ltd. , E-443 , Chopanki Industrial Area, BIDA Bhiwadi , Distt .. Alwar(Rajasthan)

28-11-2002

8519182

1991

10908

Flexible rubber tubing for liquefied petroleum gas

M/s. Seaways Industries , Khasra No. 665, Nawada Village , Uttam Nagar, New Delhi - 110059

1417

1999 28-11-2002

8519283

Gold and gold alloys , jwellery/artefacts -Fineness and marking

M/s. Gold Lust International (P) Ltd. , 1-93 , Lajpat Nagar Ilnd, Central Market (Basement) , New Delhi - 110025 2438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22 , 2004 /JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

7 8519384 28-11-2002

9537 03

1983

Conduits for electrical installations: Part 3 Rigid plain.conduits of insulating materials

M/ s . Kisan Extrusions Ltd. (Unit II) , Plot No. 52-53, SagorKuti , Sector III, Pithampur, Distt . Dhar (M.P. )

8519485 28-11-2002

1417

1999

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts-Fineness andmarking

M/s. Dhirsons Jewellers , M- 16A, M -Block Market, Greater Kailash -I , New Delhi - 110048

8519586 29-11-2002

4605

1981

Crepebandage

M/ s. Seven Seas Enterprises , J -4/ 1 A, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi - 110027

02-12-2002

8519687

4533

1995

SuctionApparatus.

M/s . Supreme Enterprises, X-33 , Naveen Shahdara , Delhi- 110032

8519788 02-12-2002

2347

1995

Domestic pressure cookers

M/s. G.R. Industries, B-10/ 5 , Group Industrial Area, Wazirpur, Delhi - 110052

8519889 02-12-2002

14543

1998

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

M/s . Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. 169-175 , AKVN Industrial Area, Village Pilukhedi , Distt. Rajgarh (Μ.Ρ. )

8519990 02-12-2002

3196 04

2001 M/s. Jai Anjaneya Gas Containers Ltd. , Plot No. 81 , Industrial Area Malanpur, Distt . Bhind (M.P. )

Welded low carban steel , cylinder exceeding 5 litre water capacity for low pressure liquefiable gases-Part 4 cylinder for toxic and corrosive gases

8520066 03-12-2002

14543

1998 M/s. Perfect Industries, 90, Industrial Area, HARDA -461331 ( Μ.Ρ. )

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

29-11-2002

8520167

9537 03

1983

Conduits for electrical installations: Part 3 Rigid Plain conduits of insulating materials

M/s. A. B. Plasto (Pvt . ) Ltd. , E- 37 , Bulandshahar Road Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P.)

8520268 05-12-2002

2347

1995

Domestic pressure cookers

M/ s . Sona Pressure Cookers , 81 , Rajendra Nagar Industrial Area, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad (U.P.)

05-12-2002

8520369

8112

1989

43 grade ordinary portland cement

M/s. Larsen & Tubro Ltd. , Hirmi Cement Works , P.O. Hirmi , Tehsil Simga , Distt. Raipur ( Chhattisgarh)

8520470 09-12-2002

694

1990 M/s. Plaza Wires & Electricals (P) Ltd. , (Unit 2) , A- 10/ 1 , Jhilmil Industrial Area, Delhi - 110032

PVC insulated cable for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

8520571 09-12-2002

9968 01

1988 M/ s . Bhumika Cables Industries , Khasra No. 902/290 , Gali No. 4, Shalimar Village , Delhi - 110088

Elastomer insulated cables : Part I For working voltage upto and including 1100V 243.9

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

09-12-2002

8520672

M/s. Tropical Agro System (India) Ltd. , 80/3/3 , Arya Nagar, 34-36 Rural Industrial Area, Loni , Distt . Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 8520773 10-12-2002 M/ s . Shimla Kitchenware Industries, 208/2 , Rajendra Nagar Industrial Area, Mohan Nagar , Ghaziabad (U.P. )

10-12-2002

8520874

M/s . Raj Appliances , 12A/ 7D, Nehar Bazar, Main Road, Maujpur , Delhi - 110053 12-12-2002-

8520975

M/ s . Amba Industries , C-156, Bullandshahar Road , Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

12-12-2002

8521068

M/s. Hindustan Thermometer Industries , WZ -46/13 , Mukherjee Park, Tilk Nagar, New Delhi - 110018 13-12-2002

8521069

M/s. Dhar Industries Ltd. , Survey No. 453/1 , Village Dhani , Distt, Dhar (M.P. ) 16-12-2002

8521270

M/s. Kinjal Electricals Pvt . Ltd. , Kinjal House , G.T. Road , P.O. Chikamberpur , Sahibabad, Distt . Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 16-12-2002

8521371

M/s . Amar Industries , 92/93 , Model Basti , New Delhi - 110005 16-12-2002

8521472

M/s. Roshni Lighting (India) , 136 , Achronda , Partapur Industrial Area , Meerut (U.P. )

16-12-2002

8521573

M/ s. Insecticides (India ) Ltd. , E-443 , Chopanki Industrial Area, BIDA, Bhiwadi , Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan)

8521674 12-12-2002: M/s . Vardhman Petrochem Pvt . Ltd. , 6 km Stone , Dehradun Saharanpur Road, Village Kumharhera, Saharanpur (U.P. )

8521775 16-12-2002 M/ s . Harso Steels Private Limited, B- 2 , Site IV, Industrial Area. Sahibabad (U.P. )

1987

11995

Isoproturon , WP

1995

2347

Domestic pressure cookers

366

1991 Electric irons

1999

Wooden flush door shutters 2202 (solid core type) : Part I Plywood face pannels

ΟΙ

1994 Clinical thermometer Part 1 : 3055 Solid stem type

3975

1999 Mild steel wires, formed wires and tapes for armouring of cables

1996

8828

Electrical accessories- Circuit breakers for over current portection for house- hold and similar installations

1987

1258

Bayonet lamp holders

418

1978 Tungsten filament general service electric lamps

1987

12016

Cypermethrin EC

1988

10124、01 & 02 Fabricated PVC fittings for potable water supplies Part 1 General require- ments ; Part 2 Specific re- quirements for sockets

1998

1161

Steel tubes for structural. purposes 2440

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1

7 8521876 18-12-2002

5410

Cement paint

1992 M/ s. Sleen Water Proof Compound Pvt . Ltd. , F -9(B ) , Old RIICO Industrial Area, Dholpur-328001 (Rajasthan)

8521977 19-12-2002

374

1979

Electric ceiling type fans and regulators

M/s. Quality Home Appliances , 47 , Rajasthani Udyog Nagar, Delhi - 110033

8522070 19-12-2002

14543

1998

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

M/s. PAG (India) Enterprises , Khasra No. 5/26 , Old No. 39 , Budhpur, G.T. Karnal Road, Delhi - 110036

8522171 19-12-2002

3906

1995 M/s. Maya Fertilizers and Pesticides , 8th KM Stone, Bhopa Road, Muzzaffar Nagar , (U.P. )

Crop protection equip- ment-Hand operated knapsack sprayer, piston type

8522272 19-12-2002

2347

1995

Domestic pressure cookers

M/s . Amika Screen Works , 2D , Industrial Area, Maxi Road, Ujjain (M.P. )

8522373 20-12-2002

14543

1998 M/ s . K. K. Industries, G- 1-109 , Industrial Area, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

8522474 20-12-2002

Chlorine tablets

9825

1993 M/ s. Ess Gee Formulations , 50, I Sector, Govindpura, Industrial Area, Bhopal

8522575 23-12-2002

1417

1999

Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/artefacts Fineness and marking

M/s . Anishka Jewellers , 161 , Gaffar Market, Hardhian Singh Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi - 110005

8522676 24-12-2002

3390

1988

Sphygmonanometer, mercurial

M/s. Meditech Industries , 37 , South Anarkali , Near Som Bazar, Chander Nagar, Delhi - 110052

8522777 26-12-2002

9356

1980

Butachlor Emulsifiable Concentrates

M/s. Insecticides ( India) Ltd. , E -443 , Chopanki Industrial Area , BIDA, Bhiwadi , Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan)

8522878 26-12-2002

14151 02

1999

Sprinklerpipes : Part 2 Quick coupled polye- thylene pipes

M/ s . Rajasthan Engineers and Contractor Enterprises , F-45, Industrial Area, Sikar(Rajasthan)

8522979 26-12-2002

1328

1996

Veneered decorative

plywood

M/s. Bharat Woodcrafts , Kh No. 16/13 , Min ( 1-05) 16/14 Min (0-09 ), Kh No. 16/13 , Min ( 1-13 ) 14/24/1 (0-13 ) , Kh No. 16/13 Min ( 1-13 ) , Shahbad Daulatpur, Delhi - 110042 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2441

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

8523072 27-12-2002 M/s. R.J.P. (India), C-7, DSIDC Engg . Complex, Mangolapuri Industrial Area, Phase- I , Delhi- 110083 8523173 30-12-2002 M/ s. Deep Engineering Works , RZ -96B, Ravi Nagar Extension , New Delhi - 110018 8523274 30-12-2002 M/s . Balkam India Ltd. , B -33 , Old Vishnu Garden, New Delhi - 110018 8523375 01-01-2003 M/s. Kalyan Cable, 458-466 , Gali No. 8 , (IInd Floor) , Shambunath Compound, Friends Colay Industrial Area, G.T. Road, Shahdara, Delhi - 110095 8523476 01-01-2003 M/s . Ansul International , E-358 , Nirmam Vihar, Delhi - 110092

01-01-2003

8523577

M/s . Gokul Das &Co. Jewellers , 2502, Gurudwara Road, Karol Bagh , New Delhi - 110005 8523678 03-01-2003 M/s . Ruby Rubber Industries , H- 726 -A, Road No. 9F2, Vishwakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur-302013

8523779 02-01-2003 M/s . Dhar Industries Ltd:, (Teletape Division) , Survery No. 453/1 , Village Dhani, Distt. Dhar (M.P. ) 8523880 03-01-2003 M/s. Padmini Industries Ltd. , Village Dundahera, P.O. Khekra , Baghpat (U.P. )

8523981 03-01-2003 M/s. Insecticides ( India) Ltd. , BIDA, Bhiwadi , Distt . Alwar (Rajasthan) E-443 , Chopanki Industrial Area,

06-01-2003

8524074

M/ s . Micro Super Cables ( P) Ltd. 36/20 , Dilshad Garden, G.T. Road , Shahdara , Delhi -110095

8524175 (07-01-2003 M/ s . Natural Flow Polymers Pvt . Ltd. , E- 227 , Road No. 9 -E , V.K.I. Area , Jaipur -302013 T

8524276 07-01-2003 M/s. Surbhi Metals (India) Pvt . Ltd. , C- 173 , Mandore Industrial Area, Jodhpur- 342006 07-01-2003

8524377

M/s . Kriti Industries ( India) Ltd. , Plot No. 75-86, Pithampur, Sector II , Distt Dhar (M.P. ) 1496 GI/2004-15

694

1990 PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

1992 Floor springs (hydraulically 6315 regulated) for heavy doors

8828

1996 Electrical accessories- Circuitbreakers for over current protection for household and similar installations

694

1990 PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

1999

1417

Gold and gold allyos , jewellery/artefacts-Fine- ness and marking

1417

1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts-Fine- ness and marking

1985 Rubber sealing rings for gas 5382 mains, water mains and sewers

280

1978 Mild steel wire for general engineering purposes

1980

5894

Rubber hose for sand blasting

3903

1984 Dimethoate emulsifiable concentrates

8783

03 1995 , Winding wires for submer- sible motor-Part 4 : Indi- vidual wires- Section 3 Polyester and Polypro- pylene Insulated Wires

9301

1990 Deepwell Handpumps

1983

1038

Steel door windows and ventilators

1999

14151 02

Irrigation equipment- Sprinkler pipes-Part 2 Quick coupled polyethy- lenepipes 2442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8524478 07-01-2003 M/s. Kriti Industries ( India ) Ltd. , Plot No. 75-86 , Pithampur, Sector II , Distt . Dhar (M.P. ) 09-01-2003

8524579

M/s . Devson Industries , Kh. No. 902/290 , Gali No. 4, Village Shalimar, Shalimar Bagh , Delhi - 110052

10-01-2003

8524680

M/ s . Sumech Engineers Pvt. Ltd. , D-79 , Okhla Industrial Area, Phase- I , New Delhi - 110020- 13-01-2003

8524781

M/s . Sarvottam Cement Pvt. Ltd. , Daga Nagar, Charkara, Nokha-334803, Distt. Bikaner (Rajasthan) 14-01-2003

8524882

M/ s . Capital Meters Ltd. , A- 17, Sector 9 , Noida , Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar, (U.P. )

14-01-2003

8524983

M/ s . SaarTele-Technologies Ltd. (Unit 2 ) , Survey No. 514/1 , 514/2/1 , A.B. Road , Village Dhani , Distt. Dhar (M.P. ) 27-12-2003

8525076

M/ s . Kamdhenu Enterprises Baghwali Colony, Near Rajapur Village , Ghaziabad - 201002

16-01-2003

8525177

M/s . Aakash Cables , 7, New Industrial Estate, Rawabhata, Raipur-493221 (Chhattisgarh) 8525278 17-01-2003 M/ s . Ajay Pumps and Spares , 812 /E - 12 ( A - 1 ) , Samtel Zone , BIDA Industrial Area, Bhiwadi , Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan) 17-01-2003

8525379

M/ s . Active Industries , C-618 , DSIDC, Narela Industrial Area, Delhi- 110040 8525480 16-01-2003 M/s . Ujala Pumps Pvt. Ltd. , F-83 , RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi -301019 Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan) 20-01-2003

8525581

M/s. Natural Flow Polymers Pvt . Ltd. E- 227 , Road No. 9E, V.K.I. Area, Jaipur

8525682 20-01-2003

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

1999

14151 01

Irrigation Equipmpent- Sprinkler Pipes---Part Polyethylene pipes

1984

$ 1709

Capacitors for electric fan motors

11737

1996

Industrial bag stitching machines

1987

12269

53 grade ordinary portland cement

1999

13779

ac static watthour meters, Class 1 and 2

1978

Mild steel wire for general 280 engineering purposes

996

1979

Single phase small ac and universal electric motors

398

1994

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission pur- poses : Part 4 Aluminium alloy stranded conductors (aluminium magnesium silicon type)

13287

1992

Extra deepwell handpumps

1988

1554

PVC insulated (Heavy Duty) electric cables : Part 1 for working voltages upto and including 1100V

8034

1989

Submersible pumpsets

13287

1992

Extra deepwell handpumps

362

1991

Parliament hinges

M/s . Monica Steels Pvt . Ltd. , A- 56, Sector 8 , Noida -201301 , Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar (U.P. ) 20-01-2003

8525783

M/s . Sonu Enterprises , 3258/236 , Ram Nagar, Tri Nagar, Delhi - 110035

1293

1988

Plugs and socket outlets of 250 volts and rated current upto 16 amperes [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8525884 17-01-2003 M/s . Ram Sons , C-19 , Industrial Estate, BaisGodam, Jaipur- 302006

21-01-2003

8525985

M/ s . Yadav Rubber Industries , 369 , Shahazada Bagh, .. Inderlok, New Delhi 22-01-2003

8526078

M/s. V. Automat & Instruments (P) Ltd. , F-61 , Okhla Industrial Area , Phase 1 , New Delhi - 110020 22-01-2003

8526179

M/s. Harso Steels Pvt . Ltd. , B-2, Site IV, Industrial Area , Sahibabad (U.P. ) 22-01-2003

8526280

M/s . Indraprastha Industries , 24/73 , First Floor, West Punjabi Bagh , New Delhi - 110026 23-01-2003

8526381

M/ s . Prakash PVC Udyog (P) Ltd. , 458-466, Shambhunath Compound, Street No. 8 , Friends Colony Industrial Area , New Delhi - 110095 23-01-2003

8526482

M/s . R & J Chemicals , K-26, SDA Compound Lasudia Mori (Annex) , Dewas Naka, Behind Lasudio Police Station, A.B. Road, Indore (M.P. ):

23-01-2003

8526583

M/s . Ankesh Industries , 1/11469-70, Gali No. 4, Subhash Park Extension, Shahadara, Delhi - 110032 27-01-2003

8526684

M/s . Uphar Cable Industries B-52, Rama Road, New Delhi - 110015 22-01-2003

8526785

M/s. Pashupati Impex Private Ltd. G- 1069, Phase III , Industrial Area, Bhiwadi - 301019 28-01-2003

8526886

M/ s . Continental Sprayers (Regd. ) E-5,Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase II, New Delhi - 110064 29-01-2003

8526987

M/s . S.S.C. Exim (P) Ltd. , 1853 , C/ 10 , Govindpuri Extension, Kalkaji , New Delhi - 110019 28-01-2003

8527080

M/s . Sahu Sons , F-70, Industrial Area , Haridwar (Uttranchal)

2443

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

7 .4

1988

1554 01

PVC insulated (heavy duty) electric cables: Part 1 for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

7466

1994 Rubber gaskets for pressure cookers

2148

1981 Flameproof enclosures for electrical apparatus

1990

1239

Mild steel,tubes, tubulars and other wrought steel fittintgs: Part 1 Mild steel tubes

1992

4246

Domestic gas stoves for use with liquefied petroleum gases

1990

694

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

1997

1061

Disinfectant fluids phenolic type

1988

1293

Plugs and socket outlets of 250 volts and rated current upto to 16 amperes

1990

694

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

1995

2347

Domestic pressure cookers

1994

13983

Stainless steel sinks for domestic purposes

1998

14543

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

1983

9537

Conduits for electrical installations: Part 3 Rigid plainconduits of insulating materials 2444

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

7 8527181 28-01-2003

ΟΙ

1977

2418

M/ s. Prestige Onida Ltd. , Dhalwala Industrial Area, Tehri Garhwal (Uttaranchal)

Tublar fluorescent lamps for general lighting service- Part I : Requirements and tests

8527282 31-01-2003

1417

1999

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts -Fineness and marking

M/ s. Swaran Prabha Jewellers , 16 , Happy Home , 4th ' C' Road, Near Sardarpura Police Station, Jodhpur (Rajasthan)

8527383 31-01-2003

1980

1237

Cement concrete flooring tiles

M/s. Ferrocon, Mohabewala Industrial Area, Saharanpur Road, Dehradun (Uttranchal )

03-02-2003

8527484

13049

1991

Diaphragm type (plastic Body) float operated valves for cold water services

M/s: Agia Ram Khanna & Sons , 308/ 1E, Shahzada Bagh, Old Rohtak Road, Delhi - 110035

1999 8527585 04-02-2003

13779

AC static Watt hour meters; class 1 and 2

M/s. Indotech Switchgear & Controls, 67, Rajinder Nagar Industrial Area, Sahibabad, P.O. Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad-201007

04-02-2003

8527686

13334 01

1998

Skimmed milk powder- Part- 1: Standard grade

M/s.Mother Dairy Foods Processing Ltd. , 18th km Stone , Ghaziabad-Hapur Road , Pikhuwa- 201313

06-02-2003

8527787

996

1979

Single phase small AC and universal electric motors

M/ s. B.P.R. Electricals , BE- 345 /A, Street No. 2 , B.E. Block , Hari Nagar, New Delhi - 110064

8527888 11-02-2003

1998

14543

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

M/s. Care Marketing Agency, Jyarat Naka, Seoni (M.P. )

11-02-2003

8527989

4323

1980

Endosulfan emulsifiable concentrates

M/s. Unikil Pesticides Pvt . Ltd. , 17/1 , B & C Industrial Estate, Vidisha-464002 (Μ.Ρ. )

11-02-2003

8528082

4323

1980

Endosulfan emulsifiable concentrates

M/s.Agro Care D - 11 , & D - 12 , Udyog Puram , Delhi Road, Meerut (U.P. )

14-02-2003

1987 8528183

11951

Pumpset for desert coolers

M/s . Lata HomeAppliances, WZ-4, Basai Dara Pur, New Delhi - 110015

14-02-2003

8528284

1825

1983

Aluminium alloy milk cans

M/s . Lakshmi Milktesting Machinery Co. , A-90 , Group Industrial Area, Wazirpur, New Delhi - 110052

1979 18-02-2003

374

8528385

Electric ceiling type fans and regulators

M/s . Udaan International , 25, Vijya Udyog Nagar , Chitawad Road, Indore

3975

1999 8528486 18-02-2003

Mild steel wires , formed wires and tapes for armouring of cables

M/s . Saar Tele Technologies Ltd (Unit II) , Survey No. 514/1 , 514/2/1 , A.B. Road, Village Dhani , Distt. Dhar (M.Ρ. ) 2445

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1996 "

12232 01 18-02-2003

8528587

M/s. Tirupati Sprinklers , A- 1 , Udyog Vihar , Road No. 17 , V. K. I. Area, Jaipur

Rotating sprinkler Part 1 Irrigation equipment- Design and operational requirements

1996

8828

19-02-2003

8528688

M/s . Megha Switchgear, L- 15, Udyog Nagar, Rohtak Road, Nangloi , Delhi - 110041

Electrical accessories- Circuit breakers for over current protection for house- hold and similar installations

1973 20-02-2003

8528789

Protein- rich food supplements 7021 for infants and preschool , children

M/s. Modern Food Industries (India) Ltd. , C-4, Lawrence Road Industrial Area Delhi- 110035

1999

1417

20-02-03

8528890

M/ s . P.P. Jewellers (P) Ltd. 2708, Bank Street, Karol Bagh, New Delhi - 110005

Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts -Fineness and marking

1987

11995

Isoproturon WP

8528991 20-02-03 M/s . Insecticides (India ) Ltd. E-443-44, Industrial Area, Chopanki , - Bhiwadi , Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan)

1993

2082

8529084 24-02-03

Stationary storage type electric water heaters

M/ s . Asylum Switchgears , 26/13, Ganga Sahai Colony, Mandoli , Delhi - 110093

1999

14625

Plastics feeding bottles

8529185 25-02-03 M/ s. Bonny Baby Care Pvt . Ltd. C-6, Sector 58, Phase III, Noida , (U.P.)

1988

7098 01 24-02-03

8529286

Cross linked polyethylene insulated PVC sheathed cables, Part 1 for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/ s . Cab Com India , 40/5, Street No. 1 , Mohan Nagar Extension, Samaipur, Delhi - 110042

1996

398

24-02-03

8529387

M/s. Modern Instruments Pvt. Ltd. A-4/ 15 , Site IV Industrial Area , Sahibabad (U.P. )

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part 1 aluminium stranded conductors

1995

8887

21-02-03

8529488

Bitumen emulsion for roads (cationic type)

M/s . Petrochem Specialities Ltd. , B-24 , Industrial Estate, Near ITI, Meerut Road, Muzaffarnagar -25 1003

1992

2553

27-02-03

8529589

Safety Glass -Part 2: Forroad transport

M/ s. GSC Toughened Glass (P. ) Ltd. C-45-47, Sector 57, Noida-201301

1987.

8391

25-02-03

8529690

Rubberized coir sheets for cushioning

M/ s . Valm Foam Pvt . Ltd. Bhola Road, Multan Nagar, Meerut -250002 (U.P. )

1989

5022

27-02-03

8529791

Sterilizers , instruments (table model )

M/s. Paras Enterprises, 42, Umesh Vihar , T.P. Nagar, Meerut (U.P. )

1967

2312

27-02-03

8529892

Propeller type AC ventilating fans

M/ s . Saahas Industries , K 214, Site V, Industrial Area ,

1993

2082

26-02-03

8529993

Stationary storage type electric water heaters

Surajpur, Greater Noida (U.P. ) M/s . Jain Industrial Lighting Corporation, B - 70/ 22 , DSIDC Industrial Complex, Lawrence Road, Delhi - 110035 2446

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004 / JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC: 3 (ii) ] 1

7 8530069 28-02-03

3854

1997

Switches for domestic and similar purposes

M/s. Sonu Enterprises, 3258/236 , Ram Nagar, Trinagar, Delhi - 110035

8530170 28-02-03

1417

1999 M/ s. Hopp Fashions , N- 10 , South Extension Part- 1 , New Delhi - 110049

Gold and gold alloys , jewel- lery/artefacts-Fineness and marking

8530271 28-02-03

1293

1988

Plugs and socket outlets of 250 volts and rated current upto16 amperes

M/s. S.R. Switchgear, F -34/2 , Okhla Industrial Area, Phase - II , New Delhi - 110020

8530372 03-03-03

1417

1999

Gold and gold alloys , jewel- lery/ artefacts -Fineness and marking

M/s. Mehrasons Jewellers , (Prop. Sarveshwari Diamonds and Finance Ltd. ) P- 110 / 1 , Ajmalkhan Road, Karol Bagh , New Delhi - 110005

8530473 04-03-03

13779

1999

ac static watthour meter, classes 1 and 2

M/s. Fatehpuria Vidyut Udyog (P) Ltd. Plot No. 66 , Sector 1 , Pithampur Industrial Area, Pithampur, Distt . Dhar (MP)

8530574 03-03-03

11536

1997

Processed cereal based complementary foods for infants

M/ s. Continental Milkose (India) Ltd. , Village -Habibpur, PO . Kuleshra, Noida -Dadri Road , GreaterNoida, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar (UP)

8530675 03-03-03

398

02 1996 M/s . Dhar Industries Limited, (Teletape Division) , Survey No. 453/1 , Village Dhani , Distt. Dhar (MP)

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission pur- poses: Part 2 Aluminium conductors , galvanized steel reinforced

8530776 03-03-03

02 1996

398

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission pur- poses: Part 2 Aluminium conductors, galvanized steel reinforced

M/s . Saar Tele Technologies Ltd. , (Unit- 2) Survey No. 514/1 , 514/2/1 , A.B. Road , Village Dhani , Distt. Dhar (M.Ρ. )

8530877 28-02-03

694

1990 M/s. Bhattar Cable Industries , Nagaur Road, Charkara, Nokha-334803

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V.

8530978 03-03-03

996

1979

Single phase small AC and universal electric motors

M/s. Lata Home Appliances , WZ, 4 Basai Darapur, New Delhi - 110015

8531071 03-03-03

2312

1967

Propeller type ac ventilating fans

M/s . Lata Home Appliances , WZ, 4, Basai Darapur , New Delhi - 110015

03-03-03

8531172

996

1979

Single phase small AC and universal electric motors

M/s . Nakasu International Pvt. Ltd. , B -54 , Ist Floor, Part (B); Group Wazirpur Industrial Area , Delhi - 110052.

2447

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7 1

7098

01 1998 05-03-03

8531273

M/s. Pymen Cables (India) , A-24 , DSDC Narela Industrial Area, Delhi - 110040

Crosslinked polyethylene insulated PVC sheathed cables: Part 1 for workings voltage upto and including 1100V

1975-

7933

27-02-03

8531374

Flexible polyurethane foam for domestic mattresses

M/ s. J.J. Foams Pvt . Ltd. , B-12/2 , Site IV, Industrial Area, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad (UP)

1967 03-03-03

8531475

2312

Propeller type AC ventilating fans

M/s . Fast Forward Enterprises , A-97 , Gujranwala Town, Part I , Delhi- 110009

1998

12299

8531576 04-03-03

DairyWhitner

M/s. Sterling Agro Industries Ltd. , Plot No. Q5-6, Industrial Area Ghirongi , Malanpur, Distt . Bhind , (MP)

1998

14543

04-03-03

8531677

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

M/s. Virgo Impex, 5-B, Roop Nagar Industrial Area, Loni , Ghaziabad (UP)

1998

13334

8531778 04-03-03

Skimmed milk powder-Part 1 : Standard grade

M/s, Daily Foods, Village Goina, Hapur-Modi Nagar Road , Hapur, Distt . Ghaziabad (UP)

1987

1258

Bayonet lamp holders

8531879 05-03-03 M/s . K.N. Electricals, 59, Govind Mohalla, Haiderpur, Delhi - 110052

1998

14543

8531980 07-03-03

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

M/s. Mab Gold Forms Plot No. 2 A-D , Sector -C, Industrial Area, Sirgitti , Bilaspur (CG)

1999

371

Ceiling roses

8532073 06-03-03 M/s . Gaurav Roshni Ltd. , A-30, Jhilmil Industrial Area, Shahadara, Delhi - 110095

1992

368

07-03-03

8532174

Electric immersion water heaters

M/s. Sweeton Electricals , C-49 , Jitar Nagar , Parwana Road, Khureji , Delhi - 110051

2002

4159

8532275 07-03-03

Mineral filled sheathed heating elements

M/s. Sweeton Electricals , C-49, Jitar Nagar, Parwana Road, Khureji , Delhi - 110051

1992

302 02 201 07-03-03

8532376

M/s. Sweeton Electricals C- 49 , Jitar Nagar, Parwana Road, Khureji , Delhi - 110051

Safety of household and similar electrical appliances: Part 2 particular requirements: Sec 201 electric immersion waterheater 2448

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8532477 11-03-03 M/ s. Vishal Minerals and Engineers , H- 174 , Phase- II , RIICO Growth Centre , Village Maval , Aburoad, Distt. Sirohi . (Rajasthan) 8532578 11-03-03 M/s . Dass Hitachi Ltd. , 8/9th Mile Stone, G.T. Road, Sahibabad, P.O. Mohan Nagar , Ghaziabad (UP)

8532679 11-03-03 M/ s. Hitech Products (P) Ltd. , A- 13 , B - 1 Extension Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate Badarpur , Mathura Road, New Delhi 110044

12-03-03

8532780

M/ s. Ganpati Plywood , B -95 (b ) , RIICO Industrial Area, Sikar-332001 .

8532881 11-03-03 M/s . Kusum Electricals , WZ- 13A , Basai Dara Pur, New Delhi - 110015

8532982 12-03-03 M/ s . Sarit Prawah , A- 184 A , Mahipalpur Extension , (MTNL Exchange Lane) , New Delhi - 110037 8533075 , 12-03-03 M/ s . Evergreen Industries , Khasra No. 299, Gali No. 9, Village Gokulpur, Wazirabad Road , Delhi - 110094 8533176 13-03-03 M/ s. Star Appliances, 894, Alipur Garhi , Narela Road , Delhi - 110036 8533277 13-03-03 M/ s. Bihar Tubes Ltd. , A- 19 , Industrial Area , Sikandrabad, 'Distt . Bulandshahr (U.P. ) 8533378 17-03-03 M/ s . Gilard Radio Products (P) Ltd. , 256 , Chand Nagar, New Delhi - 110018

8533479 17-03-03

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

14543

1998

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

1999

13779

ac static watthour meters, classes 1 and 2

6538

1971

Three pin plugs made up of resilient material

2202

01 1999

Wooden flush door shutters (solid core type) : Part 1 Plywood face pannels

1979

374

Electric ceiling type fans and. regulators

14543

1998

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

10908

1991

Flexible rubber tubing for liquified petroleum gas

2347

1995

Domestic pressure cookers

4923

1997

Hollow steel sections for structural use

1293

1988

Plugs and socket outlets of 250 volts and rated current upto 16 amperes

1258

1987

Bayonet lamp holders

M/ s . Gourav Roshini Ltd. , A- 30 , Jhilmil Industrial Area, Shahadara , Delhi - 110095 8533580 17-03-03 M/ s . Seven Star Electricals (P) Ltd. , 1 /488-504 , Damodar Park, Dilshad Garden, Delhi- 110095

8533681 17-03-03 M/ s. Bimal Factory, A-70, Jagatpuri , Mandoli Road, Shahadara, Delhi - 110093

7098

01 1988

Crosslinked polyethylene Insulated PVC sheathed cables: Part 1 for working voltage upto and including 1100V

2347

1995

Domestic pressure cookers 2449

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1 :

20-03-03

8533782

M/s. Hi -Print Electromack Pvt . Ltd. GI -271 , RIICO Industrial Area, Sitapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur- 302022

17-03-03

8533883

M/s . Shiva Industries , 32/7A, Street No. 7, Bhikam Singh Colony, Vishwas Nagar, Shahadara, Delhi- 110032 8533984 20-03-03 M/s. Prem Cables (Pvt . ) Ltd. , Pipalia Kalan -306307 Distt. Pali (Rajasthan) 8534077 21-03-03 M/ s. JVM Thermometer Industires , C - 145, II Floor, (Backside) , Phase I , Naraina Industrial Area, New Delhi - 110028 19-03-03

8534178

M/s . Capital Ispat Limited, E- 136 , Phase- I RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi , Distt . Alwar (Rajasthan)

21-03-03

8534279

M/s. Elmeck Switchgears , 7/91, Arjun Gali , 60Ft Road Cross , Vishwas Delhi- 110032 Nagar,

21-03-03

8534380

M/s. Fast Forward Enterpises A-97, Gujranwala Town, Part - I, Delhi-110009

24-03-03

8534481

M/s. Eurasia Doordevices Ltd. , C-96, Sector-8, Noida-201301 (UP) 8534582 24-03-03 M/s. Eurasia Doordevices Ltd. , C-96, Sector-8, Noida- 201301 (UP) 24-03-03

8534683

M/s. Pinkcity Electronics Private Limited, GI/519, Sitapura Industrial Area, Jaipur

24-03-03

8534784

M/s. Jangid Engineering Works , H-1 , 61 , Sarma Dungar Industrial Area, Jaipur 25-03-03

8534885

M/s. Bansons Domestic Appliances ( India) G-62, Laxmi Park, Nangloi, Delhi-110041

25-03-03

8534986

M/ s. Pancham Plywood Private Limited, D-44 & 44 A, RIICO Industrial Area, Kaladera, Jaipur - 303801 1496 G1/2004-16

1999

13779

ac static watthour meters , class 1 and 2

1982

10276 01 Edison screw lampholders: Part 1 Requirements and tests

1996

398

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part 1 aluminium stranded conductors

1994

3055

Clinical thermometers : Part 1 solid stem type

1999

2062

Steel for general structural purposes

1996

8828

Electrical accessories -Circuit breakers for over current protection for household and similar installations

1979

996

Single phase small ac and universal electric motors

1997

12817

Stainless steel butt hinges

1992

1341

Steelbutt hinges

1999

13779

ac static watthour meters, class 1 and 2

1983

1038

Steel door windows and ventilators

1995

2347

Domestic pressure cookers

1999

2202

Wooden flush door shutters (solid core type) : Part 1 Plywood face pannels 2450

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004 / JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8535079 26-03-03 M/ s . Savita Aqua Mineral (P)

Ltd. , Plot No. G- 1-1423 , Phase -V, Bhiwadi Industrial Area, Bhiwadi, Distt Alwar (Rajasthan) 26-03-03

8535180

M/s.Wilco Enterprises, T-1716, Desh Bandhu Gupta Road, Karol Bagh , New Delhi - 110005

8535281 27-03-03 M/s. Laxmi Pipes & Fittings Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. 529 , Sector III , Pithampur, Distt . Dhar (M.P. ) 8535382 26-03-03 M/s. B.P.R. Electricals , BE-345 /A, Street No. 2, BE Block , Hari Nagar, New Delhi - 110064

8535483 27-03-03

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 4

14543

-1998

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

01 1994

3055

Clinical thermometers : Part I solid stem type

1992

13592

UPVC pipes for soil and waste discharge systems inside buildings includings ventilation and rainwater system

1996

325

Three phase induction motors

428

2000

Washable distemper

M/ s . Oshian Paints Industries, 134 , D, Malanpur Industrial Area, Distt. Bhind (MP) 8535584 28-03-03 M/ s. Chetan Industries , 67 , Sector C, Shed No. 11 , 12 & 13 , Industrial Area, Mandideep , Distt Raisen, (M.P. ) 27-03-03

8535685

M/ s . Kataria Jewellers 16 , Laxmibai Nagar , New Delhi - 110023

8535786 28-03-03 M/s: Agarwal Jewellers Shop No. 4 & 5, Jawahar Bhawan, Roshanpura, T.T. Nagar, Bhopal -462003 8535887 31-03-03 M/s.. Medicare Products Inc. , B-30 , Shardapuri , New Delhi - 110015

8535988 31-03-03 M/ s . Royal Appliances, 603/9. G.T. Road, Opposite Syndicate Bank , Shahadara, Delhi - 110032 8536081 01-04-03 M/ s . Amrit Varsha Foam Industries (Unit 11 ) 24/23 , Gali No. 4, Libaspur , Samaipur Badli Industrial Area, Delhi - 110042

8536182 01-04-03 M/ s . Cords Cable Industries Ltd. , B - 1 /E- 5 , Mohan Co -operative Industrial Estate , Mathura Road, New Delhi - 110044 8536283 01-04-03

M/s . Perfect Pumps Pvt. Ltd. , 75/21 , Maksi Road, Industrial Area, Ujjain (M.P. )

13779

1999

ac static watthour meters,.. class 1 & 2

1417

1999

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts - Fineness and marking

1417

1999

Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

3055

Clinical thermometers- Part 2 Enclosed-scale type

01 1982

1660

Wrought aluminium, utensils : Part 1. cooking table , serving , storing and baking utensils

1741

1960

Latex foam rubber products

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

10805

1986

Foot valves , reflux valves or non-return valves and bore valves to be used in suction lines of agricultural pumping systems 2451

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

01-04-03

8536384

M/s. Paramount Surgimed Limited, A- 106, RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi -301019 Distt . Alwar (Rajasthan) 8536485 28-03-03 M/ s. Summerking Electricals Pvt. Ltd. , E-183, Kavinagar Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 8536586 02-04-03 M/s. Zen Electricals, B-9 , Sardar Nagar, Behind C.C. Colony, Delhi - 110009 04/04/03

8536687

M/ s . Nav Baharat Steels , Plot No. 24, 70/1/1 , Mangolpur Kalan, Delhi- 110085

8536788 04-04-03 M/ s . Nav Baharat Steels, Plot No. 24, 70/1/1 , Mangolpur Kalan , Delhi - 110085

04-04-03

8536889

M/s . Nav Baharat Steels , Plot No. 24 , 70/1/1 , Mangolpur Kalan , Delhi - 110085

04-04-03

8536990

M/s . Yash Industries , H-1-41 , RIICO Indusrial Area , GEGAL, Distt. Ajmer, (Rajasthan)

04-04-03

8537083

M/s .Accord Cables, BA-79, IInd Floor, Mangolpuri Industrial Area, Phase II , Delhi - 110034 04-04-03

8537184

M/s . Paras Polycab (P) Ltd. , Khasra No. 41/16 , Nagloi Extn . Ration Office Wali Gali , Nazafgarh Road, Nangloi , Delhi - 110041

08-04-03-

8537285

M/ s . Allied Electricals, K-90, Udyog Nagar Industrial Area , Rohtak Road, Delhi - 11004 I

08-04-03

8537386

M/s. M. K. Appliances , K- 25/ 1 , Street No. 20 , West Ghonda, Delhi - 110053

09-04-03

8537487

M/ s , Logani Appliances , A- 12 , L.S.C. , Padam Nagar, Kishan Ganj , Delhi - 110007

7 4

5 6

1995

33:19

Blades, Surgical , detachable (Bard Parker Type ) and handles

1992

0203

302

Safety of household and similar electrical appliances: Part 2 particular requirements, Sec. 3 Electric iron

1987

11951

Pumpset for desert coolers

1994

14105

Deepwell handpumps Components -Stainless Steel

1994

14102

Deepwell handpumps- Components -Leaded tin bronze

1994

14104

Deepwell handpumps- Components-Nitrile rubber

1991

10908

Flexible rubber tubing for liquefied petroleum gas

1990

694

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

9968

01 1988 Elastomer insulated cables: Part 1 for working voltages upto and including 1100V

1977

1534

Ballasts for fluorescent lamps: part 1 for switch start circuits

2002

4246

Domestic gas stovės for use with liquefied petroleum gases

1995

2347

Domestic pressure cookers 2452

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8537588 08-04-03 M/s. S. R. Switchgear, F -34/2 , Okhla Industrial Area, Phase II , New Delhi - 110020 8537689 08-04-03 M/ s . Remco Industries, D-36, Flatted Factory Complex, Jhandewalan, New Delhi - 110055 08-04-03

8537790

M/s. Kunal Pipes (India) Pvt Ltd. , 6, Borai Growth Centre, P.O. Rasmada, Distt Durg ( C.G. )

8537891 08-04-03 M/s. Malwa Rubber Factory, Village Lohari , Tehsil Jaora, Distt Ratlam (Μ.Ρ. )

8537992 10-04-03 M/ s . Ankesh Industries, 1/11469-70, Gali No. 4, Subash Park Extension, Shahadara, Delhi - 110032 8538085 17-04-03 M/s. Somex ( India) F -64 , RIICO Industrial Area, Neemrana, Distt Alwar (Rajasthan) 8538186 17-04-03 M/ s . Jai Pipe Products , F - 939 , Road No. 14R, V.K.I. Area, Jaipur - 302013 (Rajasthan)

8538287 16-04-03 M/ s . Vee Kay Electricals , B- 312 , Sudarshan Park, New Delhi - 110015

8538388 17-04-03 M/s . Orsons Home Appliances, 26, Sanjay Nagar, Gulabi Bagh, Delhi - 110007

853849 17-04-03 M/ s . Orsons Home Appliances , 26, Sanjay Nagar, Gulabi Baglı, Delhi - 110007

8538590 21-04-03 M/s . Jai Gopal Engg Works (P) Ltd. , Plot No. 518 , FIE , Patparganj Delhi 110092

8538691 21-04-03

[PART II SBC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

3854

1997

Switches for domestic and similarpurposes

ΟΙ 1977

1534

Ballasts for fluorescent lamps: part I for switch start circuits

1161

1998

Steel tubes for structural purposes

10908

1991

Flexible rubber tubing for liquefied petroleum gas

3854

1997

Switches for domestic and similar purposes

7098

01 1988

Crosslinked polyethylene insulated PVC sheathed cables: Part1 Forworking voltage upto and including 1100V

1989

1592

Asbestos cement pressure pipes

1979

374

Electric ceiling type fans and regulators

8978

1992

Electric instantaneous water heaters

: 1993

2082

Stationary storage type electric waterheaters

2002

3224

Valve fittings for compressed gas cylinders excluding lique- fied petroleum gas (LPG ) cyl- inders

366

Electric irons

M/ s . Summerking Electricals PvtLtd. , E- 183 , Kavinagar Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 8538792 22-04-03 M/ s. Jyoti Rubber Udyog (India) Ltd., A- 108 , Sector C, Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar (U.P. )

1991

1990

5137

Rubber hose for cement grou- ting 2453

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

7 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1999

14151

22-04-03

8538893

Irrigation equipment - Sprin- kler pipes - Part 2 Quick cou- pled polyethylene pipes

1998 M/s. Shree Padmavati Irrigations Pvt . Ltd. , P.B. No. 35, Bahadurpur Road , Burhanpur-450331

14543

22-04-03

8538994

Packaged drinking water (other than natural mineral water )

1967 M/s. Satyam Food Specialities Pvt. Ltd. , Harmada Chandwaji Bye Pass , Gram: Pokharwala, Tehsil: Amer Distt. Jaipur (Rajasthan)

2312

23-04-03

Propeller type ac ventilating fans

8539087

1987 M/s . Gaurav Luminaries Pvt Ltd. , 4/40, Site, 4, Industrial Area, Sahibabad , Ghaziabad (U.P. )

11951

Pumpset for desert coolers

23-04-03

8539188

1987 M/s. Madhuban Enterprises , 56, Maliwara , Vasant Road, Ghaziabad - 201001

1879

Malleable cast iron pipe fittings

23-04-03

8539289

1989 M/s.Jaidev Castalloys Pvt Ltd. , E-301 , Phase- II , Udyog Vihar , Sriganganagar - 334002

303

Plywood for general purposes

24-04-03

8539390

1994 M/s. Rainy Enterprises , 65, Industrial Estate, Deoband, Saharanpur (U.P. ) 247554

14103 24-04-03

Deepwell handpumps compo- nents -Mild Steel

8539491

1998 M/s . Nav Bharat Steels , Plot No. 24, 70/1/1 , Mangolpur Kalan , Delhi - 110085

13334 24-04-03

Skimmed milk powder-Part 1 Standard grade

8539592

1993 M/s . Kailash Dairy Limited Rithani Delhi Road, Meerut (UP)

2082 21-04-03

Stationary storage type electric water heaters

8539693

2000 M/ s . Saahas Industries , K-214,Site V, Industrial Area, Surajpur, Greater Noida, (UP)

4985 24-04-03 ' .

Unplasticised PVC pipes for potable water supplies

8539794

1998 M/s . Vishal Pipes Ltd. , (Unit II ), A-71 , Industrial Area, Sikandrabad, Distt Bulandshahar (U.P. )

14543 25-04-03

8539895

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral. water)

1977

01 M/s . Vaibhav Industries , 49/28 , Site - IV, Sahibabad Industrial Area, Sahibabad , Ghaziabad (UP )

1534 23-04-03

Ballasts for fluorescent lamps: part I for switch start circuits

8539996

1998 M/s . India Metal Works , Kh No. 65 , Village Shahbad Daulatpur, Delhi - 110042

14543 30-04-03

8540072

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

M/s . Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Northern Railway Wireless 2454

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 1

7 Station Area, Opposite Nangloi Bus Depot, Rohtak Road, Nangloi , Delhi - 110041

8540173

25-04-03

7098

1988

Crosslinked plyethylene insu- lated PVC sheathed cables: Part 1 for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/s. Ashoka Industries, F- 143, Road No. 07 , IndustrialArea, Bindayaka, Jaipur- 302012

8540274 29-04-03

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/s. Baheti Cables Industries , 340 A/4, 1st Floor, Gali No. 1A, Friends Colony, Industrial Area, G.T. Road, Shahdara, Delhi - 110032

8540375 30-04-03

Blockboards

1659

1990 M/s. Rainy Enterprises, 65, Industrial Estate, Railway Road, Deoband, Saharanpur (U.P. ) - 247554

854047601-05-03

4246

2002

Domestic gas stoves for use with liquefied petroleum gas

M/s. K. L. Equipments, B-282, Mangolpuri Industrial Area, Phase I, New Delhi

8540577 30-04-03

Veneered decorative.plywood 1328

1996 M/s. Pine Plywood Private Ltd. , SP-812/B -3, Industrial Area, Phase- II , P.O. Bhiwadi , Distt Alwar (Rajasthan) .

8540678 01-05-03

3735

Canvas shoes , rubber sole

1996 M/s. Derpa Industrial Polymers (P) Ltd 56 & 56A, Rural Industrial Es- tate, Loni Distt Ghaziabad (U.P. )

8540779 01-05-03

694

1990 M/s. AxisCables Pvt Ltd. , 4/9, Site 4, Sahibabad Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

PVC insulated cables for wor- king voltages upto and inclu- ding 1100V

8540880 05-05-03

Malleable cast iron pipe fittings 1879

1987 M/s . Euro Pipe Fittings Hapur Road, Near Village Phaphoonda, Meerut (U.P. )

8540981 05-05-03

Plastic feeding bottles

14625

1999 M/s . Paul Manufacturing Co. , C-278, Phase II, Mayapuri Industrial Area , New Delhi - 110064

8541074 05-05-03

3854

1997

Switches for domestic and similar purposes

M/s. Gilard Radio Products (P) Ltd. , 256, Chand Nagar, New Delhi - 110018

8541175 06-05-03

13183

1991

Aluminium paint, heat resis- tant

M/s. Kukreja Industries , 20-B, Light Industrial Area, Bhilai

8541276 06-05-03

14151

1999

Irrigation equipment - Sprin- klerpipes- Part 2 Quick coup- led polyethylene pipes

M/s . Mohit Poly Tech Pvt . Ltd. , F- 139, Road No. 6, RIICO Industrial Area, Bindayaka, Jaipur 2455 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

7 8541377 06-05-03

1971

Three pin plugs made up of 6538 resilient material

M/ s. Smart Cables and Cords Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 94, Phase II , Badli Industrial Estate, Delhi - 110042

09-05-03

8541478

1996

Veneered decorative plywood 1328

M/ s. Rainy Enterprises , 65, Industrial Estate, RailwayRoad, Deoband - 247554 (UP)

7466

1994 8541579 12-05-03

Rubber gaskets for pressure cookers

M/s. Jindal Rubber Industries, 902/290 , Gali No. 3 , Shalamar Village Industrial Area, Delhi 110052

1999 8541680 09-05-03

1417

Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking

M/ s . Shree Marudhar Jewellers , 19-23 , Amardeep Complex , Sardarpura ' B ' Road, Jodhpur

1993 09-05-03

8541781

133

Enamel, ineterior: (a) under- coating (b) finishing

M/ s. Rainbow Paints & Chemi- cals (P) Ltd. , G- 109, New Jodhpur Industrial Area, Jodhpur - 342003 Rajasthan

01 1990 13-05-03

8541882

Safety glass : Part 1 general 2553 purpose

M/s. Jaina Safty Glass Industries , G-35, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur - 321001 (Rajasthan)

1999 12-05-03

8541983

3975

Mild steel wires , formed wires and tapes for armouring of cables

M/ s. Mico Wires , G-1031 , Phase- III , RIICI Industrial Area, Bhiwadi - 301019

7466

1994 12-05-03

8541579

Rubber gaskets for pressure cookers

M/s. Jindal Rubber Industries, 902/290 , Gali No. 3 , Shalamar Village Industrial Area, Delhi - 110052

1417

1999 09-05-03

8541680

Gold and gold alloys , jewe- llery/artefacts - fineness and marking

M/s. Shree Marudhar Jewellers , 19-23 , Amardeep Complex, Sardarpura ' B ' Road, Jodhpur

1993 09-05-03

8541781

Enamel, interior : (a) under- 133 coating (b ) finishing ......

M/s . Rainbow Paints & Chemi- cals (P) Ltd. , G- 109, New Jodhpur Industrial Area, Jodhpur - 342003 Rajasthan

1990

2553

01 13-05-03

8541882

Safety glass : Part 1 general purpose

M/s . Jaina Safety Glass Industries , G- 35 , Brij Insustrial Area, Bharatpur 321001 (Rajasthan) 2456

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 1

7 12-05-03

8541983

1999

3975

Mild steel wires, formed wires and tapes for armouring of cables

M/s. Micro Wires , G-1031 , Phase -III , RIICI Industial Area, Bhiwadi - 301019

8542076 12-05-03

5382

1985

Rubber sealing rings for gas mains, water mains and sewers

M/s . Jhalani Rubber Industries , B-304 -E, Road No. 15 , Vishwa Karma Industrial Area, Jaipur-302016

8542177 13-05-03

9356

1980

Butachlor emulsifiable concentrates

M/ s. Bharti Minerals Ltd. , D-23 & 24, Industrial Area, Sikandrabad (U.P. )

8542278 19-05-03

1999

14724

Water purifiers with ultra-violet disinfection

M/ s . Bitek Electronics Ltd. , B-74 , 1st Floor, Wazirpur Industrial Area, Delhi 110052

8542379 14-05-03

02 1992

13334

Skim milk powder. Part 2 extra grade

M/s. Mother Dairy Foods Processing Ltd. , (Unit-Pilkhuwa Dairy), 18 km Stone Ghaziabad -Hapur Road, Pilkhuwa, Ghaziabad - 201313 (U.P. )

8542480 19-05-03

3247

1995

Domestic pressure cookers

M/s. Bharat Home Appliances , 1/2110 , East Ram Nagar, Delhi 110032

8542581 19-05-03

8944

1978

Chlorpyrifos Emulsifiable Concentrates

M/ s. Amvac Agrisciences , 38 , Industrial Estate . Dheer Khera, Meerut (U.P. )

8542682 19-05-03

2465

Cables for motor vehicles

1984 M/ s. Malhotra Cables (P) Ltd. , 69/2 A, Nazafgarh Road, New Delhi - 110015.

8542783 20-05-03

1999

14724

Waterpurifiers with ultra-violet disinfection

M/ s. Kukreja Transformer Mfg. Co. , A-9 , Wazirpur Industrial Area, Dehli - 110052

8542884 13-05-03

1999

13779

acstataic watthour meters, class 1 and 2d

M/s. Omega Electronics , 28E & F, Malviya Industrial Area, Jaipur-302017

8542985 20-05-03

1993

2082

Stationary storage type electric water heaters

M/ s . Sachdeva Metal Works , AH-7, Shalimar Bagh , New Delhi - 110088

8543078 12-05-03

12269

1987

53 grade ordinary portland cement

M/s.Pragati Cement Private Ltd. , PostOffice : Jhuntha, Via-Raipur Marwar, Distt. Pali - 306310

8543179 19-05-03

Blockboards

1659

1990 M/s. Shree Radha Plywood Industries Pvt . Ltd. , E-85 , Bulandshar Road Industrial Area, Ghaziabad -201009 2457

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

8543280 21-05-03 M/s .Raghunandan Jewellers PvtLtd., G- 19-22, Abu Plaza, Abu Lane , Meerut Cantt (U.P. ) 8543381 23-05-03 M/s. Varun Beverages , Azad Chowk, Rampur, Jabalpur (M.P. )

22-05-03

8543482

M/s . Siri Ram & Sons , 7531/1, Tel Mill Marg , Ram Nagar, New Delhi - 110055 21-05-03

8543583

M/s . Gaurav Luminaries Pvt. Ltd. , 4/40, Site 4, Industrial Area, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

20-05-03

8543684

M/s. KEI Industries Limited, SP 920 , Phase , III , RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi -301019

23-05-03

8543785

M/s. Tirupati Structurals Ltd. , A-6/5, Site 4 , Industrial Area, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

26-05-03

8543886

M/s. Balaji Irrigation Pvt. Ltd. , H- 133-135 , RIICO Industrial Area, Road No. 5, Ratangarh , Distt . Churu (Rajasthan)

26-05-03

8543987

M/s . Jain Brothers Sanitation Pvt . Ltd. , 12 , S.S.I. Industrial Area, G.T. Karnal Road, Delhi - 110033

28-05-03

8544080

M/s. Contimeters & Electricals, 31 , S.S.I. Cooperative Industrial Estate, G.T. Karnal Road, Delhi - 110033

26-05-03

8544181

M/s. Jagdish Construction Pvt. Limited, 134 , Peepalwala Industrial Area, Banswara , (Rajasthan)

27-05-03

8544282

M/s. Tirupati Tubes (A Unit of Advance Steel Strips (P) Ltd. , 50/5 , Site IV Industrial Area, Sahibabad , Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 1496 G1/2004-17

1999

1417.

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts-fineness and marking

1998

14543

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

1992

8978

Electric instantaneous water heaters

1979

996

Single Phase small,AC and universal electric motors

1988

9968

Elastomer- insulated cables: Part I for working voltages upto and including 1100V

7834 1,3,4 &8 1987 Injection moulded PVC fittings with solvent cement joints for water supplies: Part 1 General requirements: Part 3 Requirements for 90 degree elbows: Part 4 Requirements for 90 degree tees: Part 8 Requirements for caps

1995

4984

High density polyethylene pipes for water supplies

1994

13983

Stainless steel sinks for domestic purposes

1999

13779

AC static watthour meters, class 1 & 2

1987

12269

53 grade ordinary portland Cement

2000

4985

Unplasticised PVC pipes for potable water supplies 2458

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

8544383 27-05-03 M/ s . Electric Age ( India) , M- 161 / 1 , Gali No. 10 , Shastri Nagar, Delhi 110052

8544484 27-05-03 M/s . Laxmi Pipes & Fittings Pvt. Ltd. , Plot No. 529 , Sector III , Pithampur, Dhar (M.P. ) 8544585 28-05-03 M/s. Shri Ganpati Asbestos. Private Limited. , C -31 , RIICO Industrial Area, Kaladera , Tehsil -Chomu , Distt . Jaipur (Rajasthan) 8544686 27-5-03 M/s .. Bright Metal Works , 11 -B , Preet Vihar , Nauchandi Ground, Meerut- (U.P. )

8544787 28-05-03 M/s . Crop.Growth (India ) Pvt . Ltd. , D- 21 , Industrial Area , Sikandrabad (U.P. )

8544888 29-05-03 M/s. Jewel Seamless Ltd. Plot No. 159 , Sector III , Industrial Area , Pithampur, Distt . Dhar (M.Ρ. )

8544989 29-05-03 M/s. Bherulal Shiv Ratan Toshniwal,, Naya Bazar, Ajmer- 305001 Rajasthan

8545082 30/05/03 M/ s . Swastik Tiles , F - 660 , North Extension, Matsya Industrial Area , Alwar (Rajasthan )

8545183 30/05/03 M/ s. Hi Tech Products (P) Ltd. , A- 13 , B - 1 , Extn . Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate , Badarpur Mathura Road, New Delhi - 110044

8545284 29/05/03 M/ s. Bentex Electronics , (Prop. Bentex Builders Pvt. Ltd.) B - 66 , Gate No. 2 Naraina Industrial Area, Phase II , New Delhi - 110028

8545385 29/05/03 M/ s . Smart Cables & Cords Pvt . Ltd, Plot No. 94 , Phase II , Badli Industrial Estate , Delhi - 110042

545486 (02/06/03 M/ s. Naveen ManufacturingCo. , 7/201 , Geeta Colony, Delhi- 110031

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

1988

1293

Plug and sockets outlets of 250 volts and rated current up to 16 amperes

10124 02 1988

Fabricated PVC fittings for potable water supplies : Part 2 Specific requirements for sockets

1592

1989

Asbestos cement pressure pipes

4246

2002

Domestic gas stoves for use with liquefied petroleum gases

8944

1978

Chlorpyriphos emulsifiable concentrates

14543

1998

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

1417

1999

Gold and gold alloys , jewe- llery/ artefacts fineness and marking

1980

Cement concrete flooring tiles 1237

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

11951

1987

Pumpset for desert coolers 2459

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

04-06-03

8545587

M/ s . Sahara India Home Appliances, 26/18 , Tikri Kalan, 28 Km Stone , Delhi - Rohtak Road, Delhi 110041

03-06-03

8545688

M/s . Five Star Electricals ( India) , 2452 , Basti Punjabian, Subzi Mandi , Delhi - 110007 03-06-03

8545789

M/s. Five Star Electricals (India) , 2452 , Basti Punjabian, Subzi Mandi , Delhi - 110007 05-06-03

8545890

M/ s . S. D. Industries ( India) , 9085 , Zameer Street, Nawab Ganj , Pul Bangash, Delhi 110006

05-06-03

8545991

M/ s . Sidhartha Rubber Industry, Gali No. 1 , Khasra No. 29/34 , MasterMohalla, Libaspur, Delhi - 110042 8546084 06-06-03- M/ s . Bharti Minerals Ltd. , D-23 & 24 Industrial Area , Sikandarabad (U.P. ) 8546185 06-06-03 M/s. Novex Electrical Appliances , Plot No. 5 , Street No. 1, Malook Singh Marg , Arjun Nagar, New Delhi 110051 06-06-03

8546286

M/ s. Rajasthan Micro Irrigation System Pvt. Ltd F- 14, Bindayaka Industrial Area, Bindayaka , Jaipur - 302012 06-06-03

8546387

M/ s . Mohta Plywood Industries Pvt. Ltd. , Plot No. 51 , Site No. IV, Sahibabad Industrial Area, Distt . Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 10-06-03

8546488

M/s . Chinar Industries , G-97, I.1.D. , Kalladwas, Udaipur (Rajasthan) 10-06-03

8546589

M/s . Bansal Industries, 39 , Jai Devi Nagar, Garh Road, Meerut (U.P. ) 11-06-03

8546690

M/ s . R.C.D. Electro Controls , C-176Ground Floor , Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase II , New Delhi - 110064

1995

2347

Domestic pressure cookers

1997

3854

Switches for domestic and similar purposes

1988

1293

Plugs and socket outlets of 250 volts and rated current up to 16 amperes

1993

13849

Portable fire extinguisher , drypowder type

1998

9573

Rubber hose for liquified petroleum gas (LPG)

1980

4323

Endosulfan emulsifiable concentrates

1979

996

Single phase small ac and universal electric motor

1995

4984

High density polyethylene pipes for polable water

supplies

1996

1328

Vennered decorative plywood

1995

4984

High density polyethylene pipes for potable water supplies

1990

694

PVC insulated cables for working voltage upto and including 1100 V

2000

12640 01

Residual current operated circuit-breaker for household and similar uses- Part 1: Circuit- Breakers without integral overcurrent protection (RCCBs ) 2460

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

8546791 11-06-03 M/s. Switch Control (India) 55Govind Park, KrishnaNagar, Delhi - 110051

8546892 12-06-03 M/s . Neelkanth Metal Industries 40/6 , Gali No. 1 , Samaypur , Delhi - 110042

8546993 12-06-03 M/s. Adarsh Beverages, G-15, Udyog Kunj , Delhi -Hapur Bypass Road, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

8547086 06-06-03 M/s. Pasand Plywoods Pvt. Ltd. , Village: Dasna, Kasba Road, Distt. Ghaziabad (U.P. ) 8547187 12-06-03 Markandeya Plywood (P) Ltd. , Chhajupura, Dehradun Road, Saharanpur -247001 (U.P. ) 8547288 12-06-03 M/s. Harso Steels Pvt . Ltd. , B -2 Site -IV, Industrial Area, Sahibabad - 201010 (U.P. ) 8547389 12-06-03 M/s . Darpa Industrial Polymers (P) Ltd. , 56 & 56-A, Rural Industrial Estate , Loni , Distt . Ghaziabad - 201102 (U.P. )

8547490 13-06-03 M/s . Khurana Electricals , 91, Mandir Marg, Industrial Complex, Haider Pur, Delhi - 110088

13-06-03

8547591

M/ s .. Khurana Electricals , 91, Mandir Marg, Industrial Complex , Haider Pur, Delhi - 110088

8547692 16-06-03 M/s . Ajanta Polymers , I - 2255 , DSIDC Narela Industrial Area , Delhi- 110040

8547793 16-06-03 M/ s .. Paras Industries , A/ 10/1 , First Floor, Jhilmil Industrial Area , Shahdara, Delhi - 110095

8547894 16-06-03 M/s. Perfect Beverages Pvt . Ltd. , A-268/1 , Okhla Industrial Area, Phase I, New Delhi - 110020

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4

13947 05 01

1993

Low-voltage switchgear and controlgear-Part 5:

Control circuit devices and switching element-Section 1 : Electromechanical control circuit devices

2347

1995

Domestic pressure cookers

1998

Packaged drinking water (other 14543 than packaged natural mineral water)

2202 01

1999

Wooden flush door shutters (solid core type) Part plywood face pannels

السعات

Blockboards 14 1659

1990

2000

4985

Unplasticised PVC pipes for potable water supplics

3736

1995

Canvas Boot , Rubber Sole

1293

1988

Plugs and sockets outlets of 250 volts and rated current up- to 16 amperest

3854

1997

Switches for domestic and similar purposes 18.04

7231

1994

Plastic flushing cisterns for waterclosets and urinals

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

14543

1998

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water) 2461

17:08

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1928

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

4581-39-40 (1988 13-06-03

8547995

Precast concrete pipes (with and without reinforcement)

M/s . Royal Enterprises, 22 km on Sikar Road, Opp. JCPL, Mothu ka Bass, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

1995

3906

17-06-03

8548088

Hand operated knapsack sprayer, piston type

M/s. Msand Agro Equipment (P) Ltd. , Tejaji Nagar Chauraha, Khandwa Road, Village Kalod Kartal, Indore (M.P. )

3030-052051989

Plywood for general purposes

13-06-03

8548189

M/s. SLR Industries Pvt. Ltd. , 7/1, Site IV, Sahibabad Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

1990

1659

Blockboards

8548290 13-06-03

O込に

M/s. SLR Industries Pvt. Ltd. , 7/1, Site IV, Sahibabad Industrial Area, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

1990

694

8548391 17-06-03

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/ s . Shri Arihant Cables , 423-424, Gali No. 7, Friends Colony, Industrial Area, Shahdara, Delhi - 110095

39802071996 18-06-03

8548492

Aluminium conductors, for overhead transmission purposes: Part 2 Aluminium conductors, galvanized steel reinforced لواث

M/s. Tirupati LPG Industries Ltd. , (Conductor Division) , Industrial Area, Selakui , Dehradun, (Uttaranchal )

694

(1990 18-06-03

8548593

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/ s . N.K. Metals, 47, Gali No. 6 Friends Colony Industrial Area, Shahdara, Delhi- 110095

8500001991 19-06-03

8548694

Structural steel- microalloyed (mediunt and high strength. qualities ) mabad API

M/s . Shri Krishna Rolling Mills (Jaipur) Limited, 37, Industrial Area, Jhotwara , Jaipur- 3020127

1999

14724 20-06-03

8548795

Water purifiers with ultra- violet disinfection

C-2/2, Vijay Vihar, Phase I, M/s. Hydro Valves , (Near Village Rithala) Delhi - 110085

1990 23-06-03

8548896

PVC insulated Cablesforni 694 working voltages upto and including 1100

M/s. Polytech Industries B-15/3 , Jhilmil Industrial Area , Shahdara, Delhi - 110095

1992

8978

23-06-03

8548997

Electric instaritaneous water heaters

M/s . Kakkar Element Store (Regd.), B-85 , G.T. Karnal Road Industrial Area, Delhi-110033 2462

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] 1

7 8549090 24-06-03

398

02 1996

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part 2 Aluminium conductors, galvanized steel reinforced

M/s. Ritco Automotive ( India) Pvt. Ltd. , F - 1232 , IndustrialArea, Ghatal, Phase- I , Bhiwadi, Distt . Alwar (Rajasthan)

8549191 24-06-03

2347

1995

Domestic pressure cookers

M/s . Aakar Kitchen Appliances , 80/2 , Rajinder Nagar Industrial Area, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

8549292 20-06-03

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/ s . Ramani Power Cables (P) Ltd. , 62/2/2 , Site IV, Industrial Area, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad (U.P. )

8549393 20-06-03

1038

1983

Steel door windows and ventilators

M/s. Precision Kalpurja Udyog Pvt . Ltd. , 46, Rajinder Nagar Industrial Area, Mohan Nagar , Ghaziabad ( U.P. )

26-06-03

8549494

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/s. Golden Cab Industries , Plot No. 447 , Patparganj Industrial Area, Delhi - 110092

8549595 26-06-03

1489

1991

Portland pozzolana cement PartI : Flyash based

M/ s . Grasim Industries Ltd. , (White Cement Division) Post Office, Kharia, Khangar, Bhopalgarh , Distt. Jodhpur (Rajasthan)

26-06-03

8549696

2 1999

14151

Sprinkler pipes: Part 2 Quick coupled polyethylene pipes

M/ s . J. V. Irrigation Systems Pvt . Ltd. , G - 1-68 , Chopanki Industrial Area, P.O. Tapukara, Bhiwadi , Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan)

8549797 26-06-03

7098

1 1988 M/s. Suraj Cables , C-412 , 413 , Ground Floor , DSIDC Industrial Area, Narela , Delhi- 110040

Crosslinked polyethylene insulated PVC sheathed cable : Part 1 For working voltage upto and including 1100V

8549801 27-06-03

694

1990

PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

M/ s . Shree Manak Cable Industries, 360/367, llnd Floor, Gali No. 3 , Friends Colony Industrial Area , G.T. Road, Shahadara , Delhi- 110095

5950

8549902

1984

Short firing cables

30-06-03M/ s . Bhadora Industries, 4 SU Industrial Estate , Dhonga , Tikamgarh (M.P. )

[No. CMD - IV/ 13 : 11 ]

S. K. CHAUDHARI , Dy. Director General (Marks) 2463

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004 /ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 21 मई , 2004

हैं । श्री सरफराज खान, केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण- सह- श्रमन्यायालय के पीठासीन अधिकारी के पद पर तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक बने रहेंगे ।

[सं. ए-11016 /9 / 2003 - सी एस- Ⅱ ] वाई. पी. सहगल, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR NewDelhi, the 26th April, 2004 का.आ. 1207.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलान ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 08-06-2002 में पृष्ठ 5366-5379 पर प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ . 1877 तारीख 04-06-2002 , में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्: -

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में:-

S. O. 1208. The President is pleased to appoint Shri Sarfaraz Khan as Presiding Officer Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Cum - Labour Court Asansol w.e.f. 22-04-2004 (F.N. ). Shri Sarfaraz Khan will continue to hold the post of Presiding Officer of CGIT- cum-Labour Coum Asansol for a period of threeyears or until further orders .

पृष्ठ 5371 पर, स्तंभ 1 में गांव ' भाटवास ' के सामने

[No. A- 11016/9 /2003 -CLS - II] Y.P. SEHGAL, Under Secy.

( i ) सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 189 ", के स्थान पर सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 190", रखा जाएगा;

नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल, 2004

( ii ) सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 63 भाग -272 ", के स्थान पर सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 63 भाग-262" , रखा जाएगा

[फा. सं . आर-31015/19/2001/ ओ. आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

का.आ. 1209.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एल. आई. सी. ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय, कोजीकोड के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 8/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-4-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

New Delhi , the 21st May, 2004

[सं. एल -17012/20/98- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 27th April, 2004 S. O. 1207. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification ofthe Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1877 , dated the 4th June, 2002, published at pages 5380 to 5393 , in Part II , Section 3 , Sub- section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India, dated the 8th June, 2002, namely:-

S. O. 1209.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 8/98 ) of the Labour Court , Kozhikode now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on27-4-2004.

In the Schedule to the said notification , -

[No. L- 17012/ 20 /98 - IR (B - II) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer column 1 At page 5385 , against village "Bhatwas " , in

ANNEXURE

(1) for survey no . " 189 " read survey no. " 190" ;

IN THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE , KERALA STATE

(ii ) for survey no. " 63 part 272" read survey no . "63 part 262".

Dated this the 11th day of March, 2004.

[F. No. R- 31015/19 /2001 -OR- II]

PRESENT:

HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

श्रम मंत्रालय

Shri K. Balasubramanian, B. Com. , LL B. , Presiding Officer. I. D. (C)8/98

नई दिल्ली, 26 अप्रैल, 2004

BETWEEN :-

The Divisional Manager,

LIC of India, Divisional Office,

Management

Kozhikode .

का.आ. 1208.-राष्ट्रपति, श्री सरफराज खान 22-04-2004 ( पूर्वाहन ) से केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण- सह - श्रम न्यायालय , आसनसोल के पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करते 2464

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

PART H- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] AND

नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल , 2004

TheGeneral Secretary,

National Life Insurance Employees

Association Kozhikode Division, 1/4669, Anjali BilathikulamRoad, Calicut-6.

Union

REPRESENTATIONS SENTATIONSM

का.आ. 1210. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्दन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी.. 116/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । Sri Cleceatus Chacko, Advocate, Calicut.. For Management .

एल-41012/71/94 -आई.आर. (बी-1 ) ] Sri P. S.Murali , Advocate, Calicut ... For Union .

AWARD

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 27th April , 2004

१ This reference is made by the Government ofKerala as per orden No. L. 17012/20/98 IR. (B- II) dated 6-11-1998 for passing an award after adjudicating "whether the action of the management of Sr. Divisional Manager, LIC, Kozhikode in removing the service of Sh . Gopinathan Kodoli , Watchman, Caretake w.e.f. 27-11-1997 for certain alleged charges is justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

S.O. 1210. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( I.D. No. 116/94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofNorthern Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-04-2004.

[No. L-41012/71/94-IR (B -I)

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

2. In pursuance to the notice both parties appeared through counsel of their choice and filed respective statements. When the matter came up for evidence a witness was examined as MW1 and Exts . MI to M9 marked on the management side . Despite several chances worker did not turn up . From the available materials I am satisfied that the management is justified in removing the worker from service for the alleging charges. Non appearance of the worker also pursuades me in holding that the worker is not interested in prosecuting the reference.

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRIB NAPANDEYE

A 3. In the result , an award is passed holding that there exists no industrial dispute at present to be adjudicated by thiscourt.

LD. NO. 116/94

Passed by me on the 11th day of March, 2004.

Shri Dharant Pal S/o Shri Jai Singh,

K. BALASUBRAMANIAN , Presiding Officer

APPENDIX:

House No. 269/3 1/2, B- 1 , Jawala Nagar, Hafkara Kunda, Gali No. 6, Shahdara

Delhi - 110032

Witnesses examined on the side ofthe Management:

MW I .. K. P. Muhammed .

Versus

Document marked on the side of the Management :-

Shri R. Mukandan,

Ext.Ml . Duty Register of Watchman.

Senior, D.P.O. ,

Ext. M2 . Register ofBadliWorkers .

NorthernRailway,

D.R.M. Office ,

Ext. M3. Voucher date 6-10-1997 007 1301/1

Estate EntryRoad,

NewDelhi - 110001 .

Ext. M4. Register of Badli Workers . Branch No. I Office ofLIC

Management

AWARD

Ext. M5 . Voucher dated 6-10-1997 .

Ext. M6. Voucher dated 15-9-1997 .

Ext. M7. Voucher dated 15-9-1997.

Ext. M8 . Voucher dated 22-9-1997.

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its order No. L-41012/71 /94-IR. (B -I) dated 18-10-1994 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:-

Ext. M9. Voucher dated 22-9-1997 .

Witnesses examined and documents marked on the side of the Union:-

NIL.

"Whether the action of the management of Northern Railway in discharging the services of Shri Dharampal , Sub- Safaiwala w.e.f. 13-5-93 is 2465

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"

preliminary objection it has been alleged that the Central Administrative Tribunal has already finally dismissed earlier petition of the workman vide its judgement dated 24-12-91 . Hence claim is barred by the principles of res judicata and as such not maintainable ; that the present claim is nothing but an abuse of process of law. On merits ithas been admitted that the workman was appointed on 15th March, 1978 as substitute safaiwala, and it has been denied that the workman was appointed on 16-5-77. It has been further alleged that it is wrong to allege that the workman's eye sight was affected by the solar eclipse while onduty. The workman was declared medically unfit for all categories of employment. Therefore , there could be no question of his retention in service and his services had been rightly dispensed with . The workman was declared. medically unfit, therefore , there is no question of providing him any alternative job . The workman had been paid his duesas per rules as admissible to him and now there is nothing due or payable to him. The action of the management in discharing the workman is perfectly legal and justified . Itdeserves no intereference . The workman is not entitled to any relief and his claim is liable to be dismissed with cost.

4. Workman also filed his rejoinder denying the contents of the Written Statement and reiterating his earlier versions .

5. Both the parties adduced their evidence in support of their case.

6. I have heard ld . counsel for both the sides .

2. The workman Shri Dharam Pal while assailing the action of the management of railway in discharging him from services vide order dated 13-5-83 has filed his statement of claim alleging that he was employed as a safaiwala on 16-5-77 and he was allotted token No. 919 on 15-3-78 . He was medically examined and found fit. In 1980 when there was solar eclipse he was posted on duty to wash the coaches and while performing duty on that day, his eye sight was adversely affected. On that day he was pulling out the water pipe from one coach kept in order to put out in other coach and his face got exposed towards the Sun when the solar eclipse was there at 3.30 PM. He was working at Shahdara and he completed the duty on the said date . Late in the evening the workman felt that his eye sight was affected adversely and he realised that black spots appeared in front ofhim . His visibility diminished and at that time he did not feel that the defect was due to solar eclipse and he continued to perform duty but deterioration in his visibility persisted. He got his treatment from the Railway Dispensary atShahdra . He also obtained sick leave . He was referred to the Railway Hospital at S. P. Mukherjee Marg and got treatment there for nearly two months . Railway Hospital authorities showed their inability to give further treatment and thereafter got treatment from Safdarjung Hospital . He also got treatment from Eye Hospital in Sitapur in Uttar Pradesh and also at Astabul in Rohtak (Haryana) . His visibility continued to deteriorate . Thereafter the management proceeded to pass an order of discharge from service on 13-5-83 which was received by him subsequently. It was on the ground that he was medically unfit to perform duty. He further alleged that he had not completely lost his eye sight from both the eyes . He ought to have been given altemative job as a Waterman which he could perform while sitting at one place or the job of spinning of yard. But the workman was not given any job for financial benefit although he has put in for more than 6 years service. The conditions precedent under Section 25-F of the I.D. Act were also not complied with . Hence the order is void ab initio . That the workman has all along been facing considerable hardship and mental torture on account of unemployment. That the workman ultimately raised an industrial dispute and on account of failure of conciliation proceedings Central Government has made this reference . It is further alleged that the order of Management/ Respondent is invalid and extremely mala fide . The workman is entitled to service with full back wages and all other benefits and also appointment against alternative post with continuity of service .

7. As regards the preliminary objection of the management that the present claim of the workman is barred byprinciples of resjudicata and as such not maintainable because the claim of the workman was finally dismissed by Central Administrative Tribunal vide its judgment dated 24-12-91 in O.A.No. 1221/90 Shri Dharam Pal Vs. Union of India, a copy of the said judgment has been filed on the record which shows that the case of the workman was dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal on the ground of limitation only without considering the facts of the jurisdiction. The C.A.T itself has observed in the said judgment that " we find that the applicant was working as substitute safaiwala on regular scale of pay. His total effective service with the respondents was only from March, 1978 to January - February, 1980 when he lost his eye sight and he was finally medically decategorised for all categories. He must have been regularised in service after due screening. In spite of these factors being in his favour, the applicant failed to agitate his case at the proper time . " This observation of the C.A.T. also shows that the workman was not in regular service of the railway. Rather he was working in railway as a workman and he was not regularised 3. The claim of the workman has been contested by the inanagement by way of filing a written statement . In

1496GI/2004-18 2466

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] till then. Therefore, I am of the view that the case was within the jurisdiction of the Central Industrial Tribunal instead of within the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal . Besides, it is well settled thatwhen a matter has not been disposed of on merit and any case was dismissed merely on the ground of limitation without condoning the delay such judgement will not operate as resjudicata. It was also outside the jurisdiction of C.A.Τ. The dispute being clearly a dispute of industrial nature of work working in railway, therefore, it was within the jurisdiction of the Industrial Tribunal and there is no limitation prescribed for adjudication of a dispute under the industrial dispute Act , 1947. Therefore, I find no force inthe perliminary objection of the management and I hold that the present dispute is not barred by the principles of resjudicata.

Sub-Safaiwala w.e.f. 13-5-83 is illegal, unjustified and void ab inito. Therefore , it deserves to be quashed and the workman is entitled to be reinstated in service in Northern Railway with continuity in service and all other benefits including regularisation etc. and deserves to be posted on any other alternative post as claimed by him to perform a work which he can do in absenece of his eye sight. As regards the back wages , having regard to the facts and circumstances ofthe case, I am of the view that the workman is entitled to get 25% only of his back wages from the date of his discharge from service till the date of his reinstatement . The Management of Railway shall reinstate himin service and post on any other alternative and suitable postfor him and also make the payment of back wages in view of this award within a period of two months from the dateofpublication ofthe award in official gazette.

10. Parties shall bear their own cost . Award is given accordingly.

Dated: 19th April, 2004

B. N. PANDEY, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1271.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्थ मालाबार ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय, कोजीकोड़े केरलस्टेट के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. (सी) 7/99 ] को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/609/1998- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 27th April, 2004

S.O. 1211. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award [I.D. (C) No. 7/99] ofthe Labour Court , Kozhikode , Kerala State now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofNorth Malabar Gramin Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government 26-04-2004.

[No. L- 12012/609/ 1998 -IR (B-I) AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE IN THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE, KERALA STATE

8. The workınan claims that he was employed as Safaiwala on 16-5-77 and he was allotted token No. 919 on 15-3-78 . During service he lost his eye sight, therefore, he was discharged front serivce on 13-5-83. This fact is also admitted by the Management/Respondent that the workman was appointed on 15th March, 1978 and was discharged on 13-5-83 because he was declared Medically unfit. Thus admittedly the workman had completed more than five years service in the Railway from the date of his entering into service till the date ofhis discharge. If he was not regularised his discharge was nothing but retrenchment from service for which he was given no notice , notice pay or compensation etc. as required by law under Section 25-F of the I.D. Act which are mandatory could not be ignored. The provisions of Section 25 - F of the I.D. Act were admittedly, not followed by the management of the Railway in the present case before discharging the workman, nor any other provision of any law for discharge an employee was followed, therefore , the order of management ofNorthern Railway in discharging/terminating his services w.e.f. 13-5-83 has become illegal and void ab initio which cannot be justified. On the basis of his continuous services for such a long period of more than five years he could have been regularised much earlier, as per railway regulations / rules. He had also acquired temporary status in service soon after completing 120 days of his continuous service as provided under the Railway Regulations . Therefore, he could not legally be discharged/ retrenched from service in such a way. Admittedly he lost his eye sight during his service. Therefore , if he was medically declared unfit for the post on which he was working he could have been continued/posted on any other alternative postto perform a work which he could do but the railway authorities did not consider this aspect of the case even on liumantarian ground although the workman was legally entitled to it .

Dated this the 30th day of March, 2004.

PRESENT:

9. In view of the above discussion, I find that the action of the management of Northern Railway in discharging the services of the workman Shri Dharampal

Shri K. Balasubramanian , B. Com. , LL.B. , Presidingofficer 2467

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

L. D. (C) No. 7/99

worker guilty of all the charges levelled against him.

BETWEEN :

The Chairman,

NorthMalabar Gramin Bank,

HeadOffice

Cannanore .

...Management

AND

The General Secetary,

North Malabar Gramin Bank

Employees Association ,

FortRoad,

...Union

Cannanore . 1 .

According to the union the domestic enquiry was conducted in violation of the principles of natural justice , the finding of guilt was entered without adequate , legal evidenice and even ignoring the admission of management witnesses that the workman has not committed any misconduct . Immediately after the enquiry, the managemnt, as a punishment transfered the worker to the Payyannur Branch. Therefore, there was no need for the management to impose a second punishment on the workman. The punishment is grossly disproportionate to the charges and depicts the vindictive attitude of the management . There- fore, the union prays to set aside the order of punishment imposed on the workman and direct the management to pay all the service benefits .

REPRESENTATIONS :

ForManagement .

Sri M. Asokan, Advocate , Calicut

... For Union .

Sri P.S. Murali , Adocate, Calicut

AWARD

3. In the objection statement filed by the management , it is contended that the disciplinary proceedings were initiated on the complaint received from the manager of Ezhome Branch of the bank where the delinquent employee was working making very serious allegations ofmisconduct. After keeping the workman under suspension, a charge sheet was issued containing 11 number of charges of disobedience , insubordination and humiliation of the superior officers, staff and customers . Sri K.T. Anandapadman , Senior Manager of the management Bank was appointed as the Enquiry Officer. The workman did not raise any objection in the appointment . The workman was also represented by an employee of the management Bank as defence representative. The evidence was recorded in most fair and impartial manner . The delinquent workman fully participated in the enquiry without any objection . The Enquiry Officer found the delinquent guilty of all the charges . The findings are supported by legal evidence . Therewas no denial of opportunity or violation of principles ofnatural justice .

Sri P.K. Sukumaran, representedby the union , was working as a Messenger in the Ezhome Branch of North Malabar Gramin Bank. On the charge of misconduct , insubordination and dereliction ofduty disciplinary action was initiated by the management . As many as 11 charges were framed against the delinquent worker. After holding a domestic enquiry, the delinquention worker was found guilty of all the charges and degradation to the lower stage in the incremental scale was ordered by the management byway ofpunishment . This industrial dispute was referred by the Government of India as per Order No. L- 12012/609/ 98/IR(B - 1 ) dated 20-4-1999 to this court for adjudication and passing an award . The issue referred it for consideration is " whether the action of North Malabar Gramin Bank in imposing the punishment of degradation tothe lowest stage in the incremental scale to the workman Sri P.K. Sukumaran is justified ? If not, what relief to the workman is entitled to " ?

4. The punishment of degradation to the lowest incremental stage in the same post was proposed as a lighter punishment to avoid termination from service . The punishment was proposed only after a detailed hearing . The delinquent also filed an appeal before the Board of Directors. The appeal was also dismissed . On earlier occasion also the management had received complaints of insubordination and dereliction ofduty from the Manager . No punishment was imposed on the basis of the appology tendered by the delinquent . Workman has been misbehaving not only towards the male employees but also towards female employees resulting in loss of reputation to the bank. The punishment is moderate and proportionate to the misconduct proved against hinı . The transfer was ordered not as a punishment . Management was never vindictive towards the worker.

2. In pursuance of the notice , both parties appeared through counsel of their choice . As per the statement filed by the union, the workman was an employee of the management bank since 1978 having an unblemished service through - out his carrier. On 30-1-1997 the management suspended the workman without making any specific reference about the charges . Later , on 13-2-1997, the worker was served with a show -cause notice levelling various allegations of misconducts most of them being that the workman used abusive languge against his superior officers . A domestic enquiry was conducted through the Senior Manager of Accounts Department who found the 2468

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5. When the case came up for evidence , no oral evidence was adduced by both sides . The Enquiry File and Report of enquiry were marked as Ext . Ml with consent . The union also conceded the propriety of the enquiry.

9. I do not find any reason to interfere with the punishment imposed by the management . Consequently the worker is not entitled to any relief. An award is passed holding that the punishment imposed on the workman is justified and the worker is not eligible for any reliefs .

6. The only points that arise for determination are :-

( 1) Whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer is vitiated on the grounds of perversity or irregularity?

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by him, revised, corrected and passed by me on the 30th day ofMarch , 2004 .

K. BALASUBRAMANIAN, Presiding Officer APPENDIX

(2) Is the punishment of degradation to the lowest stage in the incremental scale imposed on the delinquent workman commensurates with the gravity of the charges proved and justifed?

Witnesses examined on either side :

NIL

Documents marked on the side of the Management : - Ext . M1 . Enquiry File (Series) Documents marked on the side of the Union: - NIL.

नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल , 2004

का.आ. 1212.-औद्योगिक विषाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कोलकाता पोर्ट ट्रस्टंके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, कोलकाता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 46/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-32011/10/2003- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 27th April , 2004

S.O. 1212.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref : No. 46/2003 ) of the Central Government Inudistrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Kolkata Port Trust and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-4-2004.

[No. L- 32011 / 10/2003 - IR(B -II] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ATKOLKATA

Reference No. 46 of 2003 Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Kolkata Port Trust AND TheirWorken

7. Points : It could be seen from Ext . M1 Enquiry File that as many eleven charges of misconduct , indicipline; insubordination were levelled against the delinquent worker and on the basis of evidence , the delinquent was found guilty of all the charges . The management and the worker were represented in the enquiry. MW1 is the Manager of Ezhome Branch of the Bank on whose report , the disciplinary action was initiated . MW1 has deposed in detail about the misconduct and misbehaviour of the delinquent worker and the events leading to the charge- sheet . His evidence remain unshaken . MW2 is a Field Supervisor who is also one of the alleged victims of misbehaviour at the hands of the delinquent worker. Union was not able to point out any reason for this witness to swear a false case . Several instances of misbehaviour and acts of insubordination are seen narrated by this witness . MW3 who was a clerical staff of the Bank , has not supported the managerment . As correctly observed by the Enquiry Officer, there is no reason to disbelive the evidence of MW1 and MW2 , responsible officers of the Bank, against whom the union was not able to point out any gredge or rancour as against the delinquent worker . The evassive nature of evidence tendered by MW3 is also seen rightly noticed by the Enquiry Officer. As correctly observed by the Enquiry Officer, his testimony cannot be relied upon in the light of other evidence and circumstaces. Thus, on a careful scrutiny of the evidence , oral and documentary, I find that the findings are well supportedby factual and legal evidence. The materials before hand would disclose several instances of misbehaviour and disobeyance of the lawful orders of the superiors by the delinquent worker. It is seen that on a former occasion, on identical charges further action was dropped accepting the apology tendered by the workman . It is apparent from the available evidence that the delinquent worker was creating an intolerable situation and industrial indiscipline . Considering the nature and gravting of the proved charges . I am of the view that the punishemnt imposed commensurates with the gravit of the offence and I even fear is on the lower side . The materials before hand, would indicate that the transfer to Payyannur Branch during the pendency of proceedings was effected not by way of punishment .

2469

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th April , 2004 PRESESENT :

MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH BANERJI, PresidingOfficer.

APPEARANCE :

-None

Onbehalf of Management

-None

Onbehalf of Workme

Industry: Port & Dock .

State: West Bengal ,

Dated: 31st March , 2004.

S. O. 1213. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes, Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (I.D. No. 39/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Travancore and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on27-4-2004 .

AWARD

[No. L- 12012/ 12/96 -IR (B - I] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER; CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- By Order No. L- 32011 / 10/2003 / IR(B - II ) dated 12-12-2003 the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Section 10( 1 )( d) and (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

CUM-LABOUR COURT-II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEWDELHI

Presiding Officer: R.N. RAI. I.D. No. 39/97

IN THE MATTER OF :

PREM SINGH

Versus

"Whether the action of the management of Dock Labour Board, Kolkata in disbursing wages/ salaries to the workmen/ staff with abnormal delay of one and half months to two months is legal , proper and justified? Whether the delay in making the salaries / wages by the DLB since June , 2001 is in violation of the provisions of Payment of Wages Act and Section 9-A of the Industrial Disputes Act ? If so , what relief is the workmen concerned entitled to ?"

STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L - 12012/12/ 96/IR(B - I) dt . 21-03-1997 the Central Government has referred the following point for adjudication. The point referred as hereunder :-

2. When the case is called out , none appears for either of the parties inspite of service of notice . It appears from the record that none has ever appeared on behalf of either ofthe parties in this case. A letter dated 11-02-2004 was however received from the Kolkata Port Trust stating that the present reference does not concern Kolkata Port Trust. It is thus clear that the parties are not interested to proceed with the present reference.

"Whether the action ofthe management of State Bank ofTravancore, in dismissing the services of Shri Prem Singh, Peon on the charges of Fraudulent activity and misappropriation of money, is fair and justified ? If not what relief the workman is entitled to ?" 3. In the circumstance , since the parties are not interested to proceed with the present reference, this Tribunal has no other alternative but to pass a 'No Dispute Award ' for disposal of the same. A ' No Dispute Award is accordingly passed and the present reference is disposed of.

Dated, Kolkata , 31stMarch, 2004.

HRISHIKESH BANERJI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1213.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ ट्रावनकोर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. 39/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-4-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In his statement of claim , he has stated that he entered into management service on 17-1-1985 and was confirmed on 31-7-1985..The workman was doing outside duties as Bill... Collector while at 2 PM closing on 28-09-1991 , he was advised not to leave but await for instructions from the Branch Manager. The four officers named S /Shri S.K. Aggarwal , R. S. Yadav, D.N. Sharma and Subhash Gupta also remained present. That all the said officers detained the workman till the Branch Manager arrived in his office at about 4.00 PM onwards , the officers escorted and produced the workman before the Branch Manager onwards locked the door. The Branch Manager very politely advised the workman that we are all working in Bank as a family members. Ifa member is involved in any problem then the whole family members come for rescue. Nothing would happenwrong with the workman if he tenders an apology in his own handwriting in connection with some withdrawals (Total Rs . 6750/-from SB A/c 2160 ofMs. Rina [सं. एल -12012/12/96- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी 2470

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Mandal. Thus , he can alone save the services of four/five officials likely to be involved in said fraudulent withdrawals . The workman rushed to the door to leave the bank premises . Meanwhile the present four officers got hold of him.

The management has filed written statement . In their written statement , the management has denied some of the contents of the paragraphs and admitted some portion of the paragraphs. Opposite Party has stated that the enquiry was quite fair. The confessional statement was not obtained under threat and coercion but the workman voluntarily gave it. Principles ofnatural justice were found in the enquiry so there is no bias .

The workman remained rigid not to concur with their ill designs then the management officers at about 8.10 P.M. played another play as if the police is coming to arrest him even on the basis of frivolous FIR. Thus the workman was made to understand himself was in strong grip and can not escape from management. Ultimately, the helpless workman bowed and about 8.45 P.M. wrote his confession besides , signed blank papers as dictated/desired by the said officers.

い The workman has filed rejoinder. In the written statement, the management has stated that the account holder made a complaint regarding the fraudulent with- drawals out ofher saving account whereas the management in AGM's letter speaks that there is no complaint by the customer and even the domestic enquiry is silent about the customer's complaint . The workman was simply a peon and he was detained and written confession was obtained from him only to involve him in the conspiracy.

The workman reported to the MD and also to the Ld. ALC whereby the workman requested to the authorities that his said confession be treated as cancelled and sought suitable action against the involved officials named therein. He was charge - sheeted and charges were framed against him

Heard arguments from both the sides and peruse the papers on record.

Charge No. I : Rs. 6750/-fraudulently withdrawn from an illiterate SB A/C -2160 in nine attempts during 26-4-1990 105-8-1991,

Charge No. II: Managed and selfobtrained a cheque book against said illiterate account and

Charge No. III : Removed/destroyed all the records

The S/B Account No. 2160 of Ms. Rina Mandal is the account of a illiterate lady. It was argued from the side of the workman that no cheque can be issued to account holder who is illiterate. Details of the deposit and with- drawal has been given which is from 26-4-1990 to 5-8-1991. Ithas been further submitted by the learned counsel of the workman that really the person involved should be the clerk/computer operator. The workman cannot be saidto have operated computer and entered the entries : The PassingOfficer maybe involved. Cashier/Checking Officer should be involved in the transaction because that the matter of withdrawing the amount from the account of an illiterate lady that is why the AGM wrote letter to enquire and called upon explanation from the persons who are in the control of the accounts but they were left and the innocent peon was involved in this case . The workman is no way concerned with the embezzlement of money. Confessional statement. was obtained under threat and coercion.He was told that FIR was lodged against him and he was to be handed over to the police. My attention was drawn to 1994 LLR 364 Kerala in which the Hon'bleHigh Court has held that in case the confessional statement is retracted, a proper enquiry should be held and proper opportunity should be given . I have gone through all the citations ofHon'ble High Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In an enquiry in which confessional statement has been alleged to be taken under threat and coercion, a proper enquiry should be held and there should be sufficient evidence to penalize the workman.

related to the said account inclusive withdrawal vouchers . The enquiry officer was appointed. The enquiry was held. The workman deposed before the enquiry officer that he was innocent . His confessional statement was taken under pressure . Management witnesses was not allowed to be cross -examined by the workman . MW- 2 was also examined. The defence assistant available to the workman took the side of the management . The workman objected to it . The telephonic examination in chief R.S. Yadav and Field Officer Subhash Gupta was recorded whereas he requested to summon them . He also wanted the management to produce the ledger keeper , Computer Operator. Passing Officer, Cashier /Teller and the Checking Officer, all the four authorized the said withdrawals/ payments onwards authenticated the relevant entries but stands ignored saying not relevant at all . He also wanted to prove letters sent to AGM but he was not allowed and he was not permitted to cross -examine the witnesses . He also requested to summon the Security Guard on duty dt. 28-09-1991 when the said confession was secured , for examination/ cross was also remained unattended rather turned down by the E.O. No person was available to defend the workman. The defense assistant took the side of the management . At last final order was passed . He was dismissed from service . The Enquiry Report and the findings of the Enquiry Officer are vitiated the workman was not given proper opportunityto cross -examine the witnesses. Telephonic messages of the witnesses were recorded . On Saturday, the bank is closed at 2.00 P.M. while he was detained and confessional statements were obtained from him.

Heard management counsel also . He said that the workman withdrew the amount from the illiterate lady account. My attention was drawn to AIR 1982 SC 673 , the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that strict rules of evidence are not appalicable in enquiry as in a criminal case . In AIR 1968 SC 266 , the Hon'ble Court has held that if there is admission of guilt, then enquiry is not necessary. My [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2471

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

attention was drawn to 1980 L.I.C. 683 Raj , 1984- I LLJ 2 (SC) . I have gone through all the citations of the Hon'ble Court but the rulings cited by the management are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case . Principles of natural justice have not been followed in this case as evidence of the witnesses have been recorded on the basis of the telephonic message and the workman got no opportunity to cross -examine the witnesses. The second point is that the account holder was an illiterate lady. She ought to have been produced in the enquiry and the thumb impression ought to have been verified but she was not produced. The copies of the papers were not made available to the workman. It was argued from the side of the workman that in the banks , there are suspicious account and the money was drawn from the suspicious accounts and deposited in the account of the illiterate lady and the cashier, ledger keeper, computer operator and the other officials withdrew the money. In order to save these officials , the branch manager obtained a confessional letter in writing of the workman between 8.00 PM to 9.00 P.M. This confessional letter has got no value in the eyes of law. It has been obtained under threat and coercion. The witnesses were not cross-examined by the workman . The defence assistant took the side of the officials . It is not possible for a peon to make entry in the ledger in the computer to get the vouchers passed and to get the chequebook issued. The conspiracy is hatched to withdraw the money of the suspense account but thereafter this workman has been fraudulently involved in the offence of embezzlement. All the citatons of the management are not relevant in the facts and circumstances . of the case . The enquiry is not proper. The principles of natural justice have not been followed.

There is no sufficient evidence to involve the workman in the said conspiracy. The charges leveled against him have not been proved. The workman deserves to be reinstated . Since he is a class - IV employee , he might be working somewhere as he is a manual worker. In the facts and cirsumstances of this case , he deserves to be reinstated with 50% back wages along with due increments.

The award is replied thus:-

The workman applicant Shri Prem Singh deserves to be reinstated from the date of his suspension. He is also entitled to get due increments and 50 % back wages.

The award is given accordingly.

Dated: 19-04-2004

R. N. RAY, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1214.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ राजस्थान लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजनकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जोधपुरके पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. 3/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-4-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12012/467/2001-आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th April, 2004

S. O. 1214.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (I.D. No. 03/2002) of the Industrial Tribunal , Jodhpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-4-2004.

[No. L- 12012/467/2001 - IR- (B -I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

अनुबंध

औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय

जोधपुर

पीठासीन अधिकारी:- श्रीमती निशा गुप्ता, आर.एच.जे.एस. ओ. वि.

(केन्द्रीय ) सं. :-03/2002

श्री पवन कुमार शर्मा पुत्र श्री श्यामलाल शर्मा मार्फत श्री विजय मेहता डिप्टी प्रेसिडेन्ट राज. ट्रेड यूनियन कांग्रेस सुरत सिंह की कोठी, सोजती गेटके बाहर, जोधपुर

... प्रार्थी

बनाम

दी ब्रांच मैनेजर, बैंक ऑफ राजस्थान लि. फलोदी ब्राँच जिला जोधुपर ... अप्रार्थी उपस्थिति:-

(1) प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री विजय मेहता उप.

(2) अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री अशोक फतेहपुरीया उप. अधिनिर्णय

दिनांक 17-1-2004

श्रम मंत्रालय भारत सरकार नई दिल्ली ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल-2012/467/2001 दिनांक 11-1-2002 से निम्न विवाद् वास्ते अधिनिर्णय इस न्यायालय को प्रेषित किया है :-

" क्या शाखा प्रबन्धक दी बैंक ऑफ राजस्थान लि. फलोदी शाखा जिला जोधपुर के द्वारा श्रमिक श्री पवन कुमार शर्मा पुत्र श्री श्यामलाल शर्मा को दिनांक 5-1-2001 से सेवा से पृथक करना उचित एवं वैध है ? यदि नहीं तो उक्त श्रमिक किस राहत कोपाने का अधिकारी है ? "

उक्त रेफरेन्स इस न्यायालय में प्राप्त होने पर दर्ज रजिस्टर्ड किया जाकर पक्षकारों को जरिये नोटिस आहुत किया गया , प्रार्थी ने अपना 2472

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

to the management of Cement Corpn. of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on28-04-2004.

[No. L-29025/3/2004- IR(M)]

B.M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEW DELHI

PresidingOfficer : R. N. RAL

L. C. A. No. 02/04 मांग-पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिसका जवाब अप्रार्थी की ओर से पेश किया , प्रार्थी ने मांग - पत्र के समर्थन में स्वयं का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया व अप्रार्थी की ओर से शिवगिरी स्वामी , दाऊलाल सोनी, गिरीजाशंकर व्यास के शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किये गये व यह प्रकरण आज वास्ते जिरह प्रार्थी हेतु सुनिश्चित है । आज दोनों पक्षों की ओर से एक प्रार्थना पत्र इस आशय का पेश हुआ कि उक्त मामले में प्रार्थी व विपक्षी बैंक के मध्य 17-1-04 को आपसी समझौता हो गया है, समझौते के तहत पक्षकारों के मध्य अब किसी प्रकार का विवाद शेष नहीं रहा है, प्रार्थना पत्र के साथ समझौता पत्र दिनांक 17-1-04 भी पेश किया जो दोनों पक्षों को पढ़कर सुनाया गया जिसे दोनों पक्षों ने सुनकर सही होना स्वीकार किया जिसपर राजीनामा तस्दीक किया गया । दोनों पक्षों ने प्रार्थना की समझौते के आधार पर एवार्ड पारित किया जावे ।

Inthe Matter of:

R.K. THAKUR

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

Alongwith this L.C.A. , L.C.A. Nos . 03/2004 to 13/2004 have been filed whose details are cited below :-

1. L.C.A. No. 03 /2004-Neeraj Sharina Versus C.C.I.

2. L.C.A. No. 04/2004-Sriniwas Kumar Versus C.C.I.

3. L.C.A. No. 05/2004- A.K. Tripathi Versus C.C.I.

4. L.C.A. No. 06/2004-Satyender Singh Versus C.C.I.

5. L.C.A. No. 07/2004-Anil Kumar Versus C.C.I. दोनों पक्षों के मध्य समझौता के अनुरूप प्रस्तुत प्रकरण का कोई विवाद नहीं रह गया है और सेवामुक्ति के सम्बन्ध में सारा विवाद सम्झौते के आधार पर समाप्त हो जायेगा परन्तु समझौते के अनुरूप प्रार्थी को 30 दिन के अन्दर राजस्थान राज्य में किसी भी शाखा में प्रार्थी को पीयोन कम फ्राश के रूप में नियुक्ति दी जायेगी, छः माह का परिवीक्षाकाल होगा तथा वह वरिष्ठता में अन्तिम स्थान पर होगा , प्रार्थी पुरानी सेवाओं का कोई परिलाभ क्लेम नहीं करेगा और नई नियुक्ति होने पर उसे पीयोन- कम- फ्राश को न्यूनतम वेतन श्रृंखला व परिलाभ प्राप्त होगा, 15 दिन में डियुटी जोईन नहीं करने पर समझौते के अनुसार उसकी सेवा का अधिकार समाप्त हो जायेगा, प्रस्तुत अधिसूचना में प्रार्थी की बैंक की ओर से कोई राशि बकाया नहीं है और इस सम्बन्ध में कोई विवाद शेष नहींहै । इसी अनुरूप समझौते के अनुसार अवार्ड पारित किया जाता है।

6. L.C.A. No. 08/2004 Chabilal Versus C.C.I.

7. L.C.A. No. 09/2004-Vikram Singh Versus C.C.I. इस अधिनिर्णय को प्रकाशनार्थ श्रम मंत्रालय भारत सरकार नई दिल्ली को प्रेषित किया जावे ।

8. L.C.A. No. 10/2004-Anuj Kumar Versus C.C.I.

9. L.C.A. No. 11/2004-Vinay Kumar Versus C.C.I. यह अधिनिर्णय आज दिनांक 17-1-2004 को खुले न्यायालय में हस्ताक्षर कर सुनाया गया।

10. L.C.A. No. 12/2004-Rajesh Singh Versus C.C.I.

निशा गुप्ता, न्यायाधीश

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004

11. L.C.A. No. 13/2004 Bipin Keshari Versus C.C.I.

12. L.C.A. No. 02/2004-R. K. Thakur

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs . So they can be decided by common findings . and a common order. So all the LCAs are taken together. The facts of all the LCAs are the same. As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above are cited below :-

का. आ. 1215.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली- II , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 02/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-29025/3/ 2004- आईआर ( विविध) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 29th April , 2004

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute Act has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India ( as in hereafter referred to as CCI as short ) . The Industrial Dispute Act is pending. The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit ofthe CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years . CCI has always been in perennial and permanent need ofthe complainant's services . They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision of the management of the CCI . They have been S.O. 1215 .-- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 02/04) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation 2473

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

It has been further submitted that the contract has been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour are out ofemployment . The management did so deliberately as Industrial dispute was pending before Tribunal.

treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation of their services . The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular einployees .

Being aggrieved by the action of the management, a writ petition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017/ 2004 and titled as B. K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations :-

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition ) Act, 1970 ( CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was, therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/so called contract labourer as contractor for distributing wages , payments etc. to the complainants.

It has been further submitted that after 31-03-1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

"I am conscious that a large number of cases are pending before the Labour Court, but as far as the present case is concerned, it is directed that the petitioners moving an application for interim relief under Section 33 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 same shall be heard and decided within a period of8weeks of its being filed. Grievance that pending salaries have not been paid would also be decided. The Industrial Tribunal would look into this aspect ofthe matter at the stage of preliminary hearing of the application when filed by the petitioners....." Ithas been further submitted that they have filed the writpetition in the Hon'ble High Court. The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude , fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

The copy of the above cited observation is annexed asAnnexure 'C'

Ithas been further submitted that the management has expressly violated the provisions of Section 33 ( 1 ) (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute.

Ithas been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and others Versus National Union Water Front Workers and others 2001 (7 ) SCC I for regularisation ofthe contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters .

The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprive of their work and they may not claim regularisation. That the action ofthe management is against the provisions of Section 33 (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.

Thatit wouldbe decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises.

It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed . The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently. On 1-9-2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractor and placed the complainants on the roll of such new labour contractor. Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor, the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor . :.

That the management is playing unfair and dialatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. That even if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA. Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution, but also denied them, their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution. The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour.

That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI . However, the management, seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter dt. 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure 'A' . Further, the management vide their letter dt. 25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working in the CCI . The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure ' B' .

TheManagement has filed reply. In their reply, it has been stated that there is 100 % share of the company and 1496GI/2004-19 2474

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

relates to 01-02-2003 . This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited . The list of contractors have been given. They are 17 in numbers . There is order from the Hon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioner with other contract of casual labourers .

The learned counsel for the management drew my attention to 1960 (1 ) SCR 806, 1994 (5) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1 , 1961 (2 ) SCR 590. I have gone through the rulings . The first is regarding pen down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances ofthe case. It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention of Section 33 of the ID Act . Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could still justify the impugneddismissal on merits . There is no different in this regard between reference under Section 10 of the ID Actor a dispute under Section 33 (a) ofthe ID Act, as such notification under Section 10 ofthe ID Act is not essential . There is no forces in the contention of the learned advocate from the side ofthe management .

the CCI has been declared a sick company by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996 . Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions ) , Act, 1985. It has been shown by Annexure ' A' . There is a ban on further employment/ recruitment in all units spread over country including headquarters etc. At the time of audit of the replying management , they have also, objected to continuation ofthe contract labour as per Annexure "B - 1 " The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed . The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt . The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got . The employees are not the employees of the CCI but they are the contract labourers ofM/ s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has direct control over the contractors . The paras of the application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc. work on contract basis . They have not been working in the industry. There is no master and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant . There is no notification under Section 10 of CLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without jurisdiction. The Government has to decide to close the unit . There is no violation of Section 33 ( I ) (a) ofthe ID Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI .. Theyhave no case . The application is misconceived.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

In SCC 1960 (1 ) page 830, it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 ofthe Act . It has been further held that Sections 33 and 33A do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement . So far as Section 33 is concerned , it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer . In case of the action being found unjustified, it can give proper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

Itwas argued from the side of the workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances ofthe case to the employees. The principle question is whether the employees are the contract labourer or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised . The contract of Shri Umesh Kumar Gupta and the contract of Shri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated.

In 1994 (5 ) SCC, 304, it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years subsequently continued in employment on account of interim orders of the court for a further period of about 8 years, they should be absorbed. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in this case that principal employers while renewing the contract should retain the old employees. In fact, such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source ofthe livelihood of the contract labour, but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer. In case, the contract labourers through thecontractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence.

Ithas been argued from the side of the management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they have been continuously working in the DCGU UNIT under the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999, the contract has been terminated. It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI . As per letter dated 7-7-1995 , 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing . It was argued from the side of the management that management has got the certificate for engagement of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R. P. Shahi , Shri Kapil Garg, Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg . Pvt . Ltd. has been filed . It 2475

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

to the mis -management of the principal employer that the unit has become sick .

there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract , the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representative ofthe opposite party. No such register has been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in the presence of the representative of the management. Incase there is a contract, there must be an agreement that what amount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers . No such sort of papers have been annexed witla the record . No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers .

Itwas further argued from the side of the management that in case, the workmen of the contract labourers , then the contractor must have received, money by cheque and they would have distributed the wages of the contract labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement between the principal employer and the contractor for doing work on a certain amount . It simply indicates that the names of the contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked for almost 20 years under the camouflage or smokescreen of contract labourers . The management has done it deliberately so that they may not become the employees of the principal employer and the management has mismanaged the entire unit so that it has become sick.

Aletter dated 09-06-2003 has been filed. It has been written in this letter that the workers have been working for a long time and they are the workmen of the principal employer. This letter has not been denied by the management. It is true that in the interim relief, the entire reliefof33 -A cannot be given under Section 33 of the Act . My attention was also drawn to 1995 (4) JТ 262, JT 2000 (1 ) SC 438 , 2001 ( 7) JT- 268 . In these cases, ifthe contract is found sham and not genuine , than the contract labourers can raise Industrial dispute . This view has been re -affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in JT 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438. My attention has been also been drawn to Hussainbhai Calicut's case ( supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals corporation case and Standard Vaccums Case , it has been held that notification under Section 10-A of CLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Section 33 of ID Act . The Hon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the writ petitionhas been dismissed and it has also been directed that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filed in pursuance of the orders of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court . The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances of this case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature ofthe contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers. The interim relief under Section 33 of the ID Act is simply applicable when the status of service has been changed after filing of the case under the Industrial Dispute Act. As such, under Section 33 of the ID Act, only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filed under the ID Act. I am of the view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-11-03 .

ORDER

The application of the applicants is allowed.

The Management is directed to set aside the order dt. 13-11-2003 and 25-11-2003 and restore the services of the complainants and maintain status quo till the industrial dispute case is decided . The applicants are also entitled to get the wages as they had been getting either as contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2003 . The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases geferred to above and a copy of the order be placed in all the LCA Cases.

Dated: 18-03-2004

It was further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case of contract labour, there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and the principal employer that the contractors will do a certain piece of work within a certain specified period and he will get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers . But not even a single paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer. In such cases, the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he gives payment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they have been made contract labourers under the camouflage or smokescreen of several contractors but they have worked for a long period and some of the workers have now become oid and about 45 to 50 years of age . It amounts to unfair labour practice by the management and its owing

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer 2476

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004

5. L.C.A. NO . 07/2004-ANIL KUMAR VERSUS C.C.L

6. L.C.A. NO . 08/ 2004 - CHABILAL VERSUS C.C.L

7. L.C.A. NO . 09 /2004- VIKRAM SINGH VERSUS C.CL

का. आ. 1216.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

8. L.C.A. NO . 10/2004- ANUJ KUMAR VERSUS C.C.L

[सं. एल-29025/4/2004- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ]

لا

9. L.C.A. NO . 11 /2004-VINAY KUMAR VERSUS C.C.L

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 29thApril, 2004

10. L.C.A. NO . 12/2004-RAJESH SINGH VERSUS C.C.L

11. L.C.A. NO. 13/ 2004-ΒΙΡPIN KESHARI VERSUS C.CL

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs . So they can be decided by common findings and a common order. So all the LCAs are taken together. The facts of all the LCAs are the same . As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above are cited below :-

S.O. 1216.-- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central . Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , New Delhi -II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn. of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-04-2004.

[No. L-29025/4/2004- IR(M)]

B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT' INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL L. C. A. NO . 02/04

IN THE MATTER OF :

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute Act has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter referredto as CCI as short) . The Industrial Dispute Act is pending. The complainants have been working at Delhi CementGrinding Unit ofthe CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years . CCI has always been in perennial and permanent need of the complainant's services . They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision ofthe management of the CCI. They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation of their services. The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees .

R.K. THAKUR

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act , 1970 ( CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was, therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/ so called contract labourer as contractor for distributing wages, payments etc. to the complainants.

Along with this L. C.A. , L.C.A. Nos . 03/2004 to 13/ 2004 have been filed whose details are cited below:-

1. L.C.A. NO . 03 /2004-NEERAJ SHARMA VERSUS C.C.L

It has been further submitted that after 31-3-1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

2. L.C.A. NO. 04/2004-SRINIWAS KUMAR VERSUS C.C.I.

3. L.C.A. NO . 05/ 2004- A.K . TRIPATHI VERSUS C.C.1.

4. L.C.A. NO. 06/2004-SATYENDER SINGH VERSUS C.CI

It has been further submitted that they have filed the writ petition in the Hon'ble High Court . The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude, fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

2477

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ⅱ) ]

It has been further submitted that the management has expresslyviolated the provisions of Section 33 (1 ) (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute.

Ithas been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and others Versus National UnionWater Front Workers and others 2001 (7) SCC 1 for regularisation ofthe contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters.

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprive of their workand they may not claim regularisation. That the action ofthe management is against the provisions of Section 33(a) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The complainants filed their statement ofclaim before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

That it would be decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but theyhave beenworking in the CCI and after the dispute of the IDAct, they have been forced not to enter the premises.

It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed. The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently. On 1-9-2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractor andplaced the complainants on the roll of such new labour contractor. Even after the appointment ofthe new labour contractor, the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

That the management is playing unfair and dialatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. That even if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature ofthe work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA. Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided underArticle 21 ofthe Constitution , but also denied them, their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution. The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour.

That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI . However, the management, seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter dated 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure ' A' . Further, the management vide their letter dated25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working inthe CCI. The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure ' B' .'

Being aggrieved by the action of the management, a writpetition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017/2004 and titled as B.K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations :-

TheManagement has filed reply. In their reply, it has been stated that there is 100% share of the company and theCCl has been declared a sick company by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996. Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) , Act, 1985. It has been shown by Annexure ' A' . There is a ban on further employment/recruitment in all units spread over country including headquarters etc. At the time of audit of the replying management, they have also objected to continuation ofthe contract labour as per Annexure "B- 1 " . The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed . The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt. The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got . The employees are not the employee of the CCI but they are the contract labourers ofM/ s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has direct control over the contractors . The paras of the application have been denied and it is Heged thatthe applicants have been engaged for misc work on contract basis. They have been been working in the industry. There is no master and servant relationship betweenCCI and the applicant. There is no notification under Section 10 of CLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without Jurisdiction. The Government has The copy of the above cited observation is annexed as Annexure 'C' .

2478

THE GAZETT OF INDIA: MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA I , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] todecide to close the unit. There is no violation of 33 ( I ) ( a) ofthe ID Act as the claimants are not the employees ofthe CCI. They have no case. The application is misconceived.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

held that Sections 33 and 33A do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement. So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it cangive proper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

Itwas argued from the side of the workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances of the case to the employees. The principal question is whether the employees are the contract labourers or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised. The contract of Shri Umesh KumarGuptaand the contract ofShri Hari Singh Contractor wasalsoterminated.

In 1994 (5 ) SCC , 304, it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years subsequently continued in employment on account of interim orders ofthe court for a further period of about 8 years, they should be absorbed. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in this case that principal employers while renewing the contract should retain the old employees. In fact, such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source ofthe livelihood ofthe contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer. In case, the contract labourers through the contractorhave been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence.

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999, the contract has been terminated. It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI.As per letter dt. 7-7-1995, 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing. It was argued from the side of the management that management has got the certificate for engagement of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R.P.Shahi, Shri KapilGarg, Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg. Pvt . Ltd. has been filed . It relates to 01-02-2003. This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited . The list of contractors have been given. They are 17 in numbers . There is order from the Hon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioner with other contract ofcasual labourers .

Ithasbeen argued from the side ofthe management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they have been continuously working in the DCGU UNIT under the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract, the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper hasbeen filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representative ofthe oppositeparty. No such register has been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in the presence of the representative of the management. In case there is a contract, there must be an agreement that what amount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the cocntractor would pay to the workers . No such sort ofpapers have been annexed with the record. No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers.

The learned counsel for the management drew my attention to 1960( I ) SCR 806, 1994 (5) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1. 1961 (2 ) SCR 590. I have gone through the rulings . The first is regarding pen down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances of the case . It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention ofSection 33 of the ID Act . Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could still justify the impugned dismissal on merits . There is no different in this regard between reference under Section 10 of the ID Act or a dispute under Section 33 ( a) of the ID Act, as such notification under Section 10 of the ID Act is not essential. There is no forces in the contention ofthe learned advocate from the side of the management.

In SCC 1960 ( 1 ) page 830, it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 of the Act . It has been further

Itwas further argued from the side ofthe management that in case, the workmen of the contract labourers , then the contractor must have received money by cheque and they would have distributed the wages of the contract labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement between the principal employer and the contractor for doing work on acertain amount . It simply indicates that the names of the contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked- for almost 20 years under the camouflage or smokescreen of contract labourers . The management has done it deliberately so that they may not become the employees of the principal employer and the management has mismanaged the entire unit so that it has become sick .

2479

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

the case under the Industrial Dispute Act . As such, under Section 33 of the ID Act , only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filed under the ID Act. I am ofthe view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services priorto filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-1-03 .

ORDER

The application of the applicants is allowed. The Management is directed to set aside the order dt. 13-11-2003 and 25-11-2003 and restore the services of the complainants and maintain status quo till the industrial dispute case is decided. The applicants are also entitled to get the wages as they had been getting either as contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2003. The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases referred to above and a copy of the order be placed in all the LCA Cases. Dated: 18-03-2004

R.N. RAI, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004 It was further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case of contract labour, there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and the principal employer that the contractors will do a certain piece ofwork within a certain specified period and he will get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers. But not even a single paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money fromthe principal employer. In such cases, the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he gives payment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they have beenmade contract labourers under the camouflage orsmokescreen of several contractors but they have worked fora long period and some ofthe workers have now become old and about 45 to 50 years of age . It amounts to unfair labour practice by the management and its owing to the mis-management of the principal employer that the unit has become sick.

का. आ. 1217.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 12/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-29025/5/2004- आई ० आर ० ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 29th April, 2004

S.O. 1217.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn. ofIndia and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-04-2004.

[No. L- 29025/5/2004- IR(M) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL L.C.A. NO. 02/04 Aletter dated 09-06-2003 has been filed. It has been written in this letter that the workers have been working for long time and they are the workmen of the principal employer. This letter has not been denied by the management . It is true that in the interim relief, the entire reliefof 3 3 -A cannot be given under Section 33 oftheAct. Myattentionwasalso drawn to 1995 (4) JT 262 , JT 2000( 1 ) SC 438 , 2001 (7 ) JT- 268 . In these cases, if the contract is found sham and not genuine, than the contract labourers canraise Industrial dispute . This view has been re-affirmed by the Hobn'ble APEX Court in JT 2000 (1 ) SC 438. My attention has also been drawn to Hussainbhai Calicut's case( supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation case and Standard Vacuums Case, it has been held that notification under Section 10-A of CLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Section 33 of IDAct. TheHon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants maymove the Industrial Tribunal and the writ petition has been dismissed and it has also been directed that the applicationwillbe decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filed in pursuance of the orders of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. The citations referred to by the management are not relevant a to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances ofthis case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the, nature ofthe contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers . The interim reliefunder Section 33 of the ID Act is simply applicable whenthe status of service has been changed after filing of 2480

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] IN THE MATTER OF :

R.K. THAKUR

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

(Regulation andAbolition) Act , 1970 (CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was , therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/ so called contract labourer as contractor for distributingwages , payments etc. to the complainants.

FINDINGS

Alongwith this L. C.A. , L.C.A. Nos. 03/2004 to 13/2004 have been filed whose details are cited below:-

Ithas been further submitted that after 31-3-1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

1. L.C.A. NO . 03 /2004-NEERAJ SHARMA VERSUS C.CI

) 2. L.C.A. NO . 04/2004 SRINIWAS KUMAR VERSUS C.C.I

3. L.C.A. NO . 05/ 2004- Α.Κ. TRIPATHI VERSUS C.C.I

Ithasbeenfurther submitted that theyhave filedthe writ petition in the Hon'ble High Court . The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude, fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the IndustrialAdjudicator.

4. L.C.A. NO.06/2004-SATYENDER SINGH VERSUS C.C.1.

5. L.C.A. NO . 07/ 2004- ANIL KUMAR VERSUS C.C.I.

6.L.C.A. NO . 08 / 2004 - CHABILAL VERSUS C.C.I.

Ithasbeen further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and others Versus National Union Water Front Workers andOthers 2001 (7) SCC 1 for regularisation ofthe contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters.

7. L.C.A. NO . 09/ 2004- VIKRAM SINGH VERSUS C.CI.

The complainants filed their statement of claim before theRegional Labour Commissioner (Central ) , New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

8. L.C.A. NO . 10/2004 - ANUJ KUMAR VERSUS C.C.I.

9. L.C.A. NO. 11 /2004- VINAY KUMAR VERSUS C.C.L.

10. L.C.A. NO. 12/ 2004-RAJESH SINGH VERSUS C.C.I.

11. L.C.A. NO. 13 /2004-ΒΙΡΙN KESHARI VERSUS C.C.I.

It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed . The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently. On 1-9-2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractorandplaced the complainants on the roll of such new labour contractor. Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor , the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs. So they can be decided by common findings and a common order . So all the LCAs are taken together, The facts of all the LCAs are the same . As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above are cited below:-

That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI . However, the management, seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter date 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure ' A' . Further, the management vide their letter date25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working inthe CCI. The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure ' B' .

Ithas been further submitted that the contract has been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour are out of employment : The management did so deliber- ately as Industrial dispute was pending before Tribunal .

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute Act has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter) referred to as CCI as short) . The Industrial DisputeAct is pending. The complainants have been working at Delhi CementGrinding Unit ofthe CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years . CCI has always been in pernnial and permanent need of the complainant's services. They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision of the management of the CCI. They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation of their services . The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees .

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour

Being aggrieved by the action ofthe management, a writpetitionbefore the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed asWP No. 990-1017/2004 and titled as B.K.Shukla 2481

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Vs. Union ofIndia and Others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations:-

The copy of the above cited observation is annexed as Annexure ' C' .

atDelhi is also not doing any production for the last more, than five years where the complainants are allegedly employed. The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt. The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got . The employees are not the employee of the CCI but , they are the contract labourers ofM/s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has directed control over the contractors . The paras of the application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have not been engaged for misc. work on contract basis. They have not been working in the industry, there is not master and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant . There is no notification under Section 10 of CLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without Jurisdiction . The Government has to decide to close the unit . There is no violation of33 ( 1 ) (a) of the ID Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI . They have no case. The application is misconceived.

It has been further submitted that the management has expressly violated the provisions of Section 33 ( 1 ) ( a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprive of their work and they may not claim regularisation . That the action ofthe management is against the provisions of 33 (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.

Thatitwould be decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises .

It was argued from the side ofthe workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances ofthe case to the employees . The principle question is whether the employees are the contract labourers or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised. The contract of Shri Umesh KumarGupta and the contract of Shri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated.

That the management is playing unfair and dialatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. Thateven if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA . Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution, but also denied them, their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution. The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour.

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999, the contract has been terminated. It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999 The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI. As per letter dt . 7-7-1995 , 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing. It was argued from the side of the management thatmanagement has got the certificate for engagement of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R.P. Shahi , Shri Kapil Garg , Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg. Pvt . Ltd. has been filed. It relates to 01-02- 2003. This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited. The list of contractors have been given. They are 17 in numbers . There is order from theHon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioner with other contract of casual labourers .

The learned counsel for the management drew my attention to 1960( 1 ) SCR 806, 1994 (5) SCC304, 2001 (7) SCC 1. 1961 (2) SCR 590. I have gone through the rulings . The TheManagement has filed reply. In their reply, it has been stated that there is 100% share of the company and the CCI has been declared a sick company by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996 . Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions ) , Act, 1985. It has been shown by Annexure ' A' . There is a ban on further employment/recruitment in all units spread over country including headquarters etc. At time of audit of the replying management they have also objected to continuation of the contract labour as per Annexure "B- 1 " . The DCGU unit

1496 GI/2004-20 2482

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] first is regarding pen down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances of the case . It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above,that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention of Section 33. of the ID Act. Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could still justify the impugneddismissal on merits . There is no difference in this regard between reference under Section 10 of the ID Act or a dispute under Section 33 (a) of the ID Act, as such notification under Section 10 ofthe ID Act is not essential . There is no forces in the contention of the learned advocate from the side of the management.

Itwas further argued from the side ofthe management thatin case, the workmen of the contract labourers , then the contractor must have received money by cheque and they would have distributed the wages of the contract labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement between theprincipal employer and the contractor for doing work ona certain amount. It simply indicates that the names of the contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked for almost 20 years under the camouflage or smokescreen of contract labourers . The management has done it deliberately so that they may not become the employees of the principal employer and the management has mismanaged the entire unit so that it has becomę sick.

In SCC 1960 (1 ) page 830 , it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 of the Act .It has been further held that Sections 33 and 33A do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement . So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition ofservice and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it cangive proper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

In 1994(5 ) SCC 304 , it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years subsequently continued in employment on account of interim orders of the court for a further period of about 8 years, they should be absorbed. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in this case that principal employers while renewing the contract should retain the old employees . In fact, such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source of the livelihood of the contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer. In case , the contract labourers through the contractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence .

Itwas further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case ofcontract labour, there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and theprincipal employer that the contractors will do a certain piece ofworkwithin a certain specified period and he will get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers. But not even a single paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer. In such cases, the contractor receivesmoneythrough a cheque and first he gives payment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they have been made contract labourers under the camouflage or smokescreen of several contractors but they have worked for a long period and some of the workers have now become old and about 45 to 50 years of age. It amounts to unfair labour practice by the management and its owing to the mis -management of the principal employer that the unit hasbecome sick.

It has been argued from the side of the management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they have been continuously working in the DCGU UNIT under the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract, the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representative ofthe opposite party. No such registerhas been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in the presence of the representative ofthe management. In case there is a contract, there must be an agreement that whatamount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers . No such sort of papers have been annexed with the record. No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers

Aletter dated 09-06-2003 has been filed. It has been written in this letter that the workers have been working for long time and they are the workmen of the principal employer. This letter has not been denied by the management. It is true that in the interim relief, the entire reliefof Section 33 -Acannot be given under Section 33 of the Act . My attention was also drawn to 1995 (4) JT 262 , JT 2000 (I ) SC 438 , 2001 (7) JT 268. In these cases , ifthe contract is found sham and not genuine, then the contract labourers can raise Industrial dispute. This view has been re- affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in JT 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438. My attention has been also been drawn to Hussainbhai Calicut's case (supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation case and Standard Vacuums Case , it has been 2483

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn. of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-04-2004.

[No. L- 29025 /6/2004- IR(M) ]

BIM DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N.RAL L.C.A. NO. 02/04

IN THE MATTER OF:

RK THAKUR

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

held that notification under Section 10- A of CLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Section 33 of ID Act . The Hon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the writ petition has been dismissed and it has also been directed that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filed in pursuance ofthe orders of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court . The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances ofthis case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature of the contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers . The interim relief under Section 33 ofthe ID Act is simply applicable when the status ofservice has been changed after filing of the case under the Industrial Disputes Act. As such, under Section 33 ofthe ID Act, only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filed under the ID Act. I am ofthe view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-11-03.

Along with this L.C.A. , L.C.A. Nos . 03/2004 to 13/2004 have been filed whose details are cited below:-

ORDER

1. L.C.A. NO. 03/2004-NEERAJ SHARMA VERSUS C.CI.

2. L.C.A. NO . 04/2004-SRINIWAS KUMAR VERSUS C.C.L

3. L.C.A. NO. 05/2004- Α.Κ. TRIPATHI VERSUS CCT

4. L.C.A. NO. 06/2004-SATYENDER SINGH VERSUS CCI

The application of the applicants is allowed. The Management is directed to set aside the order dt. 13-11-2003 and25-11-2003 and restore the services of the complainants and maintain status quo till the industrial dispute case is decided. The applicants are also entitled to get the wages as they had been getting cuhdi, is contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2004. The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases referred to, above and a copyof the order be placed in all the LCA Cases Dated:-18-03-2004.

5. L.C.A. NO 07/ 2004- ANIL KUMAR VERSUS C.CL

R.N. RAL, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004

6. L.C.A. NO. 08/ 2004 - CHABILAL VERSUS C.C.L

7. L.C.A. NO. 09/2004- VIKRAM SINGH VERSUS

& LGA NO 10/2004 ANUJ KUMAR VERSUS ン

CANO 11 /2004- VINAY KUMAR VERSUS CCL

WICA NO 12/2004 RAJESH SINGH VERSUS .

का. आ. 1218.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो . ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल -29025/6/2004 - आईआर ( विविध ) ] डेविड अवर सचिव

11 LCA NO . 13 /2004- ΒΙΡΙN KESHARI VERSUS C.C.I

New Delhi , the 29th April , 2004

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs . So they can be decided by common findings and a common order. So all the LCAs are taken together. The facts of all the LCAs are the same, As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above are cited below :-

S.O. 1218 In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the 2484

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter date 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure' A' . Further, the management vide their letter dated25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working inthe CCI . The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure 'B' .

Ithas been further submitted that the contract has been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour are out of employment . The management did so deliber- ately as Industrial dispute was pending before Tribunal .

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute Act has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter referred to as CCI as short ) . The Industrial Dispute Act is pending. The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit ofthe CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years. CCI has always been in perennial and permanent need of the complainant's services. They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision of the management ofthe CCI . They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation oftheir services. The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees .

Being aggrieved by the action of the manage- ment , a writ petition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017/2004 and titled as B. K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and others. The Hon'bleHigh Court has made the following observations:-

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation andAbolition) Act , 1970 (CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was , therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/ so called contract labourer as contractor for distributing wages, payments etc. to the complainants .

It has been further submitted that after 31-3-1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

"I am conscious that a large number of cases are pending before the Labour Court, but as far as the present case isconcerned, it is directed that the petitioners mov- ing an application for interim relief under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 same shall be heard and decided within a period of 8 weeks of its being filed. Griev- ance that pending salaries have not been paid would also be decided . The Industrial Tribunal would look into this aspect of the matter at the stage of preliminary hearing of the application when filed hy the petitioners ..... "

The copy ofthe above cited observation is annexed as Annexure ' C' .

Ithas been further submitted that they have filed the writpetition in the Hon'ble High Court . The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude, fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

Ithas been further submitted that the management has expressly violated the provisions of Section 33 (1 ) (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute .

It has been further submitted that Steel Authority of IndiaLimited and others Versus National Union Water Front Workers and others 2001 (7) SCC 1 for regularisation ofthe contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters.

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprive of their work and they may not claim regularisation. That the ac- tion of the management is against the provisions of33 (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.

The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) , New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

That it wouldbe decided later on whether the work- ers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dis- pute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises.

า It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed. The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently. On 1-9-2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractor and placed the complainants on the roll ofsuch new labour contractor . Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor, the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

That the management is playing unfair and dialatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. Thateven if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA . Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution , but also denied them, That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI . However, the management, seemingly scared about the fate of the 2485

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution. The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour.

;

and packing . It was argued from the side of the management thatmanagement has got the certificate for engagement of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R.P.Shahi, Shri Kapil Garg, Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg . Pvt . Ltd. Has been filed . It relates to 1-02-2003. This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited . The list of contractors have been given. They are 17 in numbers . There is order from the Hon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioner with other contract of casual labourers.

The learned counsel for the management drew my attention to 1960( 1 ) SCR 806, 1994 (5) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1 1961 (2 ) SCR 590 : I have gone through the rulings . The first is regarding pin down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances of the case . It has been held in case ofthe Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention ofSection 33 of the ID Act. Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could still justify the impugned- dismissal on merits . There is no different in this regard between reference under Section 10 of the ID Act or a dispute under Section 33 (a) of the ID Act, as such notification under Section 10 of the ID Act is not essential. There is no forces in the contention of the learned advocate from the side of the management .

TheManagement has filed reply. In their reply, it has been stated that there is 100 % share of the company and the CCI has been declared a sick company by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996 . Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions ), Act, 1985. It has been shown by Annexure ' A' . There is a ban on further employment/ recruitment in all units spread over country including headquarters etc. At time of audit ofthe replying management, they have also objected to continuation of the Contract labour as per Annexure "B - 1 ". The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed. The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt . The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got . The employees are not the employee of the CCI but they are the contract labourers of M/ s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has directed control over the contractors. The paras of the application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc. on contract basis . They have not been working in the industry. there is not master and servant relationship between CCl and the applicant . There is no notification under Section 10 ofCLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without jurisdiction . The Government has to decide to close the unit. There is no violation of33 ( 1 ) (a) of the ID Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI. They have no case . The application is misconceived.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record .

In SCC 1960 ( 1 ) page 830 , it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 of the Act . It has been further held that Section 33 and 33 - Ado not -lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement . So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition ofservice and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it cangive proper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

It was argued from the side of the workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances ofthe case to the employees . The principle question is whether the employees are the contract labourer or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised . The contract of Shri Umesh Kumar Gupta and the contract of Shri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated .

In 1994 ( 5 ) SCC, 304, it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years subsequently continued in employment on account of interim orders of the court for a further period of about 8 years , they should be absorbed. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in this case that principal employers while renewing the contract should retain the old employees . In fact, such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source ofthe livelihood of the contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer. In case , the contract labourers through the contractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

labour practice by the management and its owing to the mis -management of the principal employer that the unit hasbecome sick.

It has been argued from the side of the management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they have been continuously working in the DCGU UNIT under the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract, the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representative ofthe opposite- party. No such register has been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in the presence ofthe representative of the management. In case there is a contract, there must be an agreement that what amount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers . No such sort ofpapers have been annexed with the record. No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers.

It was further argued from the side ofthe management that in case, the workmen of the contract labourers , then the contractor must have received money by cheque and they would have distributed the wages of the contract labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement between the principle employer and the contractor for doing work on a certain amount. It simply indicates that the names of the contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked for almost 20 years under the camouflage or smokescreen of contract labourers . The management has done it deliberately so that they may not become the employees of the principal employer and the management has mismanaged the entire unit so that it has become sick.

A letter dated 09-06-2003 has been filed. It has been writtenin this letter that the workers have been working for long time and they are the workmen of the principle employer. This letter has not been denied by the management . It is true that in the iterim relief, the entire reliefof 33 - A cannot be given under Section 33 of the Act . My attention was also drawn to 1995 (4) JT 262, JT 2000( 1 ) SC 438 , 2001 (7 ) JT- 268 . In these cases , if the contract is found sham and not genuine , than the contract labourers canraise Industrial dispute. This view has been re- affirmed by the Hon'bleAPEX Court in JT 2000 SC 438. My attention hasbeen also been drawn to Hussainbhai Calicut's case (supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation case and Standard Vaccums Case . it has been held that notification under Section 10- A of CLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Section 33 of ID Act . The Hon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the writ petition has been dismissed and it has also been directed that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filed in pursuance of the orders of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances of this case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature of the contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers . The interim relief under Section 33 of the ID ACT is simply applicable when the status of service has been changed after filing of the case under the Industrial Dispute Act . As such , under Section 33 of the ID Act , only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filed under the ID Act. I am ofthe view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward *25-11-03 .

ORDER

The application of the applicants is allowed. The Management is directed to set aside the order dt . 13-11-2003 and 25-11-2003 and restore the services of the complainants and maintain status quo till the industrial dispute case is decided. The applicants are also entitled to get the wages as they had been getting either as contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2003. The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases referred to above and a copy of the order be placed in all the LCA Cases.

Dated: 18-03-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer It was further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case of contract labour, there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and the principal employer that the contractors will do a certain piece of work within a certain specified period and he will get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers . But not even a single paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer. In such cases , the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he gives payment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages. These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they have been made contract labourers under the camouflage or smokescreen of several contractors but they have worked . fora long period and some of the workers have now become old and about 45 to 50 years of age . It amounts to unfair भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004

का. आ. 1219.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2487 5. L.C.A. NO . 07/2004- ANIL KUMAR VERSUS C.C.I.

6. L.C.A. NO . 08 / 2004-CHABILAL VERSUS C.C.I.

7. L.C.A. NO. 09/2004- VIKRAM SINGH VERSUS C.C.I.

8. L.C.A. NO . 10/ 2004- ANUJ KUMAR VERSUS C.C.I.

[सं. एल-29025/7/2004- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ]

9. L.C.A. NO . 11/2004- VINAY KUMAR VERSUS C.C.I.

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 29th April, 2004

S.O. 1219. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 10/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn. of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-04-2004 .

10. L.C.A. NO . 12/2004- RAJESH SINGH VERSUS C.C.L

11. L.C.A. NO . 13/2004-ΒΙPIN KESHARI VERSUS C.C.I.

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs . So they can be decided by common findings and a common order . So all the LCAs are taken together, The facts of all the LCAs are the same . As such the facts- of the LCAs referred to above are cited below:-

[No. L-29025/7/2004 - IR(M) ]

B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL L.C.A. NO . 02/04 IN THE MATTER OF :

R.K. THAKUR

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

Along with this L.C.A. , L.C.A. Nos . 03/2004 ΤΟ 13 / 2004 have been filed whose details are cited below :-

1. L.C.A. NO . 03/2004 NEERAJ SHARMA VERSUS C.C.L

2. L.C.A. NO. 04/2004 SRINIWAS KUMAR VERSUS C.C.L

3. L.C.A. NO. 05/ 2004- Α.K. TRIPATHI VERSUS C.C.I.

4. L.C.A. NO. 06/2004-SATYENDER SINGH VERSUS C.C.I.

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute Act has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter referred to as CCI as short ). The Industrial Dispute Act is periding. The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit of the CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years . CCI has always been in pernnial and permanent need of the complainant's services . They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision of the management of the CCI . They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation of their services . The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees .

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition ) Act, 1970 ( CLRA ) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was, therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/so called contract labourer as contractor for distributing wages, payments etc. to the complainants .

It has been further submitted that after 31-3-1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

It has been further submitted that they have filed the writpetition in the Hon'ble High Court. The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude, fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

2488

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

Ithas been further submitted that the management has expressly violated the provisions of Section 33 ( I ) ( a ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute .

It has been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and others Versus National Union Water Front Workers and others 2001 ( 7) SCC 1 for regularisation ofthe contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters .

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprived of their work and they may not claim regularisation . That the action of the management is against the provisions of Section 33 ( a) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 .

The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

That itwould bedecided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises.

It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed. The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently. On 1-9-2003 , ССІ аppointed another, labour contractor and placed the complainants on the roll ofsuch new labour contractor . Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor, the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

That the management is playing unfair and dilatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation . That even if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA . Their suspen- sion is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution , but also denied them , their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution. The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour .

That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI . However, the management , seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter dated 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure ' A' . Further, the management vide their letter dated 25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working in the CCI . The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure ' B' .

It has been further submitted that the contract has been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour are out of employment . The management did so deliber- ately as Industrial dispute was pending before Tribunal.

Being aggrieved by the action of the management, a writpetitionbefore the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017/2004 and titledas B.K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations: -

The copy of the above cited observation is annexed as Annexure ' C' .

The Management has filed reply. In their reply, it has been stated that there is 100% share of the company and the CCI has been declared a sick company by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996 . Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Com- panies (Special Provisions) , Act , 1985. It has been shown by Annexure' A' . There is a ban on further employment/ recruitment in all units spread over country including head- quartersetc. At time of audit of the replying management they, have also objected to continuation of the contract labour as per Annexure "B - 1 " . The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed. The Cor- poration gets financial assistance from the Govt . The worker union has moved application that they are not will- ing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got. The employees are not the employee ofthe CCI but they are the contract labourers of M/ s. Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has directed control over the contractors . The paras of the application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc . on contract basis. They have been working in the industry. There is not master and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant . There is no notification under Section 10 of CLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without Jurisdiction. The Govern- ment has to decide to close the unit. There is no violation भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ofSection 33 ( 1 ) ( a) of the ID Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI . They have no case . The appli- cation is misconceived.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

It was argued from the side of the workman appli- cants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances of the case to the employees . The principle question is whether the employees are the contract labourer or they are the em- ployees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised. The contract of Shri Umesh Kumar Gupta and the contract of Shri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated .

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999, the contract has been terminated. It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI . As per letter dt . 7-7-1995, 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing. It was argued from the side of the manage- ment that management has got the certificate for engage- ment of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R. P. Shahi , Shri Kapil Garg, Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg . Pvt. Ltd. has been filed. It relates to 01-02-2003 . This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited. The list of contractors have been given . They are 17 in numbers . There is order from theHon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service ofpetitioner with other contract of casual labourers .

The learned counsel for the management drew my attention to 1960 (1 ) SCR 806, 1994 (5 ) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1 , 1961 (2 ) SCR 590. I have gone through the rulings . The first is regarding pin down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances ofthe case . It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction ofthe Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contraven- tion of Section 33 of the ID Act Even if such contra- vention was proved , the employer could still justify the impugned-dismissal on merits . There is no different in this regard between reference under Section 10 of the ID Act or a dispute under Section 33 (a ) of the ID Act as such ' notification under Section 10 ofthe ID Act is not essential . There is no forces in the contention of the learned advo- cate from the side of the management .

In SCC 1960 (1 ) page 830 , it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 of the Act . It has been fur- 1496GI/2004-21

2489 ther held that Section 33 and 33A do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award rein- statement, So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adju- dicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it can give proper reliefto the aggrieved workmen.

In 1994 (5 ) SCC , 304 , it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years sub- sequently continued in employment on account of interim orders of the court for a further period of about 8 years , they should be absorbed . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in this case that principal employers while re- newing the contract should retain the old employees . In fact, such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source of the liveli- hood ofthe contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer. Incase, the contract labourers through the contractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence.

It has been argued from the side of the management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they havebeen continuously working in the DCGU UNIT under the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract, the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representa- tive of the opposite party. No such register has been pro- duced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in the presence of the representative of the management . In case there is a contract, there must be an agreement that what amount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers . No such sort of papers have been annexed with the record. No paper has been annexed regarding the pay- ment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers .

It was further argued from the side of the manage- ment that in case , the workmen of the contract labourers , then the contractor must have received money by cheque and they would have distributed the wages of the contract labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement between the principal employer and the contractor for doing work on a certain amount . It simply indicates that the names of the contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked for almost 20 years under the camouflage or smokescreen ofcontract labourers . The management has done it delib- erately so that they may not become the employees of the 2490

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1, 1926

principal employer and the management has mismanaged the entire unit so that it has become sick .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] circumstances of thincase as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature of the contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers . The interim relief under Section 33 of the ID Act is simply applicable when the status of service has been changed after filing of the case under the Indus- trial Disputes Act . As such , under Section 33 of the ID Act, only status quo can be restored.Whether the appli- cants are contract labour or the employees of the manage- ment will be decided in the case filed under the ID Act. I am ofthe view that the management should maintain the sta- tus quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-11-03 .

ORDER

The application of the applicants is allowed. The Management is directed to set aside the ordere dt. 13-11-2003 and 25-11-2003 and restore the services ofthe complainants and maintain status quo till the indus- trial dispute case is decided. The applicants are also en- titled to get the wages as they had been getting either as contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2003. The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases referred to above and a copy of the order be placed in all the LCA Cases.

Dated: 18-03-2004

It was further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case of contract labour, there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and the principal employer that the contractors will do a certain piece of work within a certain specified period and he will get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers . But not even a single paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer. In such cases, the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he gives pay- ment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen appli cants are initially not the contract labourers but they have been made contract labourers under the camouflage or smokescreen of several contractors but they have worked for a long period and some of the workers have now be- come old and about 45 to 50 years of age . It amounts to unfair labour practice by the management and its owing to the mis -management of the principal employer that the unit has become sick .

R.N. RAI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004

का. आ. 1220.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 09/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-29025/ 8/2004- आई.आर. (विविध ).]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th April , 2004

S.O. 1220.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 09/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn. of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-04-2004.

[No. L-29025/8/2004 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

2491

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER :

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

Itis submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 19CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was, therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/ so called contract labourer as contractor for distributingwages , payments etc. to the complainants .

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAI.

L.C.A. NO . 02/04

Ithasbeenfurther submitted that after 31-03-1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

IN THE MATTER OF : -

R. K. THAKUR

VERSUS

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

It has been further submitted that they have filed thewritpetition inthe Hon'ble High Court . The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'bleDelhiHigh Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude, fetter , restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

Along with this L.C.A. , L.C.A. Nos . 03/2004 to 13/2004 have been filed whose details are cited below:-

L.C.A. No. 03/2004-Neeraj Sharma VERSUS CCL 1.

L.C.A. No. 04/2004 Sriniwas Kumar VERSUS CCI 2

Ithas been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and others Versus National Union Water Front Workers and others 2001 (7) SCC 1 for regularisation ofthe contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters.

3. L.C.A. No. 05/2004-A.K. Tripathi VERSUS CCI

4 L.C.A. No. 06/2004 Satyender Singh VERSUS CCI

5. L.C.A. No. 07/2004-Anil Kumar VERSUS CCI

6. L.C.A. No. 08/2004-Chabi Lal VERSUS CCI

The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) , New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made .

L.C.A. No. 09/2004-Vikram Singh VERSUS CCI 7.

8. L.C.A. No. 10/2004-Anuj Kumar VERSUS CCI

9. L.C.A. No. 11/2004-Vinay Kumar VERSUS CCI

10. L.C.A. No. 12/2004 Rajesh Singh VERSUS CCL

11. L.C.A. No. 13/2004 Bipin Keshari VERSUS CCI

It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed . The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently. On 1-9-2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractor and placed the complainants on the roll of such new labour contractor. Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor , the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly- appointed labour contractor...

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs. So they can be decided by common findings and a common order. So all the LCAs are taken together. The facts of all the LCAs are the same. As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above are cited below :-

That in the absence to any job order to the demarcated contractor , the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI. However, the management , seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter dt .. 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure ' A' , Further, the management vide their letter dt . 25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working in the CCI . The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure ' B ' .

It has been further submitted that the contract has been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour are out of employment . The management did so deliberately as Industrial dispute was pending before Tribunal .

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter referred to as CCI as short) . The Industrial Dispute is pending . The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit ofthe CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years . CCI has always been in perennial and permanent need of the complainant's services . They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision ofthe management of the CCI . They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation of their services. The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees .

2492

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] Being aggrieved by the action of the management, a writ petitionbefore the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017/2004 and titled as B.K.Shukla Vs. Union of India and others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations :-

The copy of the above cited observation is annexed asAnnexure ' C' .

It has been further submitted that the management has expressly violated the provisions of Section 33 ( 1 ) (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute .

country including headquartersetc. At the time of audit of the replying management they, have also objected to continuation of the contract labour as per Annexure " B- 1 " . The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed. The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt. The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industrybut they must get VRS as other employees have got. The employees are not the employee of the CCI but theyare the contract labourers of M/s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited . He has direct control over the contractors. The paras of the application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc work on contract basis. They have not beenworking in the industry. There is not master and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant. There is no notification under Section 10 of CLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without jurisdiction. The Government has to decide to close the unit . There is no violation of 33 (1 ) (a) of the ID ACT as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI . They have no case . The application is misconceived.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprive of their work and they may not claim regularisation. That the action of the management is against the provisions of33 (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 .

Thatit would be decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises .

Itwas argued from the side ofthe workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances ofthe case to the employees . The principle question is whether the employees are the contract labourer or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised . The contract of Shri Umesh KumarGupta and the contract ofShri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated .

That the management is playing unfair and dilatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. Thateven if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature ofthe work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA . Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution , but also denied them , their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution. The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour .

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999, the contract has been terminated. It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI. As per letter dt. 7-7-1995 , 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing . It was argued from the side of the management that management has got the certificate for engagement of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R. P. Shahi , Shri Kapil Garg , Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg . Pvt . Ltd. has been filed. It relates to 01-02-2003 . This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited. The list of contractors have been given. They are 17 in numbers . There is order from the Hon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioner with other contract of casual labourers .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

The learned counsel for the management drew my attention to 1960 ( 1 ) SCR 806 , 1994 (5) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1 , 1961 (2 ) SCR 590. I have gone through the rulings. The first is regarding pin down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances of the case . It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention of Section 33 of the ID ACT. Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could still justify the impugned -dismissal on merits . There is no different in this regard between reference under Section 10 of the ID ACT or a dispute under Section 33 (a) of the ID ACT, as such notification under Section 10 of the ID ACT is not essential . There is no forces in the contention of the learned advocate from the side of the management .

In SCC 1960 ( 1 ) page 830 , it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 of the Act . It has been further held that Section 33 and 33 - A do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement . So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adjudicate upon justifiability of the action of the employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it can give proper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

In 1994 ( 5 ) SCC , 304 , it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years subsequently continued in employment on account of interim orders of the court for a further period of about 8 years, they should be absorbed. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in this case that principal employers while renewing the contract should retain the old employees . In fact, such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance ofthe source ofthe livelihood of the contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer . In case , the contract labourers through the contractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smoke screen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence .

Ithas been argued from the side ofthe management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they have been continuously working in the DCGU UNIT under the smoke.screen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract , the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representative ofthe opposite party. No such register has been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in the presence of the representative ofthe management . Incase there is a contract , there must be an agreement that

2493

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

what amount isto be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers . No such sort ofpapers have been annexed with the record. No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers.

Itwas further argued from the side of the management that in case , the workmen of the contract labourers , then the contractor must have received money by cheque and they would have distributed the wages of the contract labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement between the principle employer and the contractor for doing work ona certain amount . It simply indicates that the names of the contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked for almost 20 years under the camouflage or smoke screen of contract labourers . The management has done it deliberately so that they may not become the employees of the principal employer and the management has mismanaged the entire unit so that it has become sick.

Itwas further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case of contract labour, there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and the principal employer that the contractors will do a certain piece ofwork within a certain specified period and he will get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers . But not even a single paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer. In such cases , the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he gives payment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they have been made contract labourers under the camouflage or smoke screen of several contractors but they have worked for a long period and some of the workers have now become old and about 45 to 50 years of age . It amounts to unfair labour practice by the management and its owing to the mis -management of the principal employer that the unit has become sick .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/ JYAISTHA 1, 1926

can raise Industrial dispute. This view has been reaffirmed by the Hon'ble APEX Court in JT 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438. My attention has been also been drawn to Hussain Bhai Calicut's case(supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation case and Standard Vaccums Case . It has been held that notification under Section 10 - A of CLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Secrtion 33 of ID Act. The Hon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the writ petition has been dismissed and it has also been directed that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filed in pursuance of the orders ofthe Hon'ble Delhi High Court . The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances of this case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature of the contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers . The interim reliefunder Section 33 of the ID ACT is simply applicable when the status of service has been changed after filing of the case under the Industrial Dispute Act. As such, under section 33 of the ID Act , only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filedunder the ID Act. I am ofthe view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-11-03 .

ORDER

The application of the applicants is allowed. The Management is directed to set aside the order dt . 13-11-2003 and 25-11-2003 and restore the services of the complainants and maintain status quo till the industrial dispute case is decided. The applicants are also entitled to get the wages as they had been getting either as contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2003. The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases referred to above and a copy of the order be placed in all the LCA Cases.

Dated: 18.03.2004..

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004 का. आ. 1221.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पों. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 08/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-29025/9/2004-आई.आर. ( विविध) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 29th April , 2004

S.O. 1221. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government . hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 08/04) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn . of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on28-04-2004.

[No. L- 29025/9/2004 - IR(M) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT-II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL L. C. A. NO. 02/04 IN THE MATTER OF :

R.K. THAKUR

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

Along with this L.C.A. , L.C.A. Nos . 03/2004 to 13/2004 have been filed whose details are cited below:-

I. L.C.A. NO . 03 / 2004- NEERAJ SHARMA VERSUS C.C.I.

2. L.C.A. NO. 04/2004-SRINIWAS KUMAR VERSUS 3. L.C.A. NO. 05/2004-Α.Κ. TRIPATHI VERSUS C.C.I.

4. L.C.A. NO . 06/2004 SATYENDER SINGH VERSUS C.C.I.

5. L.C.A. NO . 07/2004- ANIL KUMAR VERSUS C.C.I.

6. L.C.A. NO . 08 / 2004-CHABILAL VERSUS C.C.I.

7. L.C.A. NO . 09/ 2004- VIKRAM SINGH VERSUS C.C.I.

8. L.C.A. NO . 10/ 2004-ANUJ KUMAR VERSUS C.C.L

9. L.C.A. NO . 11/ 2004- VINAY KUMAR VERSUS C.C.I.

10. L.C.A. NO . 12 /2004-RAJESH SINGH VERSUS C.C.L 2495 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

11. L.C.A. NO . 13/2004-ΒΙΡIN KESHARI VERSUS

C.C.I.

new labour contractor . Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor , the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs . So they can be decided by common findings and a common order. So all the LCAs are taken together. The facts of all the LCAs are the same. As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above are cited below:-

That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI . However, the management, seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants, designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter dt . 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure ' A' . Further, the management vide their letter dt. 25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working in the CCI . The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure 'B ' .

Ithas been further submitted that the contract has been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour are out ofemployment. The management did so deliberately as Industrial dispute was pending before Tribunal .

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute Act has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter referred to as CCl as short ) . The Industrial Dispute Act is pending. The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit of the CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years. CCI has always been in perennial and permanent need of the complainant's services . They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision of the management of the CCI . They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation of their services . The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees .

Being aggrieved by the action of the management, a writ petitionbefore the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017/2004 and ' titled as B. K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations :-

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was, therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/ so called contract labourer as contractor for distributing wages , payments etc. to the complainants.

It has been further submitted that after 31.03.1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

The copy of the above cited observation is annexed as Annexure ' C' .

Ithas been further submitted that they have filed the writ petition in the Hon'ble High Court . The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude , fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

It has been further submitted that the management hasexpresslyviolated the provisions of Section 33 ( 1 ).(a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute .

Ithas been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and others Versus National Union Water Front Workers and others 2001 (7) SCC 1 for regularisation ofthe contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters .

The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) , New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprive of their workand they may not claim regularisation, That the action ofthe management is against the provisions of 33 (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 .

That itwould be decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ]

KumarGupta and the contract of Shri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated.

} That the management is playing unfair and dilatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. That even if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA. Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution, but also denied them, their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution. The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour.

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999 , the contract has been terminated. It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI.As per letter date 7-7-1995, 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing. It was argued from the side of the management that management has got the certificate for engagement of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R. P. Shahi, Shri Kapil Garg, Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg. Pvt. Ltd. has been filed. It relates to01-02-2003, This letter indicates that the work wasbeing done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited . The list of contractors have been given. They are 17 in numbers . There is order from theHon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioners with other contract ofcasual labourers .

The learned counsel for the management drew my attention to 1960 ( 1 ) SCR 806, 1994 (5 ) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1 , 1961 (2) SCR 590. I have gone through the rulings. The first is regarding pin down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances of the case. It has been held incase oftheApex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention of Section 33 of the ID ACT. Even if such contraventionwas proved, the employer could still justify the impugned dismissal on merits . There is no different in thisregardbetween reference under Section 10 of the ID ACT or a dispute under Section 33 ( a) of the ID ACT, as such notification under Section 10 of the ID ACT is not essential . There is no forces in the contention of the learned advocate from the side of the management .

TheManagement has filed reply. In their reply, it has been stated that there is 100% share of the company and the CCI has been declared a sick company by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996. Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies ( Special Provisions) , Act, 1985. It has been shown by Annexure ' A' . There is a ban on further employment/recruitment in all units spread over country including headquarters etc. At the time of audit of the replying management they, have also objected to continuation ofthe contract labour as per Annexure "B- 1 " . The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed. The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt . The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got . The employees are not the employee of the CCI but they are the contract labourers of M/s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has direct control over the contractors . The paras ofthe application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc . work on contract basis. They have not been working in the industry. Their is not master and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant . There is no notification under Section 10 of CLRA ACT in this case and the proceedings are without jurisdiction. The Government has to decide to close the unit . There is no violation of33 (1) ( a) of the ID Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI. Theyhave no case . The application is misconceived.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

In SCC 1960 (1 ) page 830 , it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 ofthe Act. It has been further heldthat Section 33 and 33 A do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement . So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it cangive proper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

It was argued from the side ofthe workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances ofthe case to the employees . The principle question is whether the employees are the contract labourer or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised. The contract of Shri Umesh

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

while renewing the contract should retain the old employees. In fact, such a condition is incorporated inthe contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source ofthe livelihood of the contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer. In case, the contract labourers through the contractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence.

handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative ofthe management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the 'workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they havebeen made contract labourers under the camouflage or smokescreen of several contractors but they have worked for a long period and some of the workers have now become old and about 45 to 50 years of age. It amounts tounfair labour practice by the management and its owing tothe mis-management of the principal employer that the unit has become sick.

Ithas been argued from the side ofthe management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they have been continuously working in the DCGU UNITunder the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract, the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence ofthe representative ofthe opposite party. No such register has been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in the presence ofthe represnitative ofthe management. Incase there is a contract, there must be an agreement that what amount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor-would pay to the workers . No such sortofpapers have been annexed with the record . No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers .

Itwas further argued from the side ofthe management that in case, the workmen of the contract labourers, then the contractor must have received money by cheque and they would have distributed the wages of the contract labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement between the principal employer and the contractor for doing work on a certain amount . It simply indicates that the names of the contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked for almost 20 years under the camouflage or smokescreen of contract labourers . The management has done it deliberately so that they may not become the employees of the principal employer and the management has mismanaged the entire unit so that it has become sick.

Aletter dated 09-06-2003 has been filed. It has been writteninthis letter that the workers have been working for a long time and they are the workmen of the principal employer. This letter has not been denied by the management. It is true that in the interim relief, the entire reliefof33 -Acannot be given under Section 33 of the Act . My attentionwas also drawn to 1995 (4) JГ 262, ГГ 2000(1 ) SC 438 , 2001 (7) JT-268. In these cases , ifthe contract is found sham and not genuine, than the contract labourers canraise Industrial dispute . This view has been re-affirmed by the Hon'ble APEX Court in JT 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438. My attention has been also been drawn to Hussainbhai Calicut's case (supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation case and Standard Vaccums Case, it has been held that notification under Section 10-A of CLR Act is not necessary for filing application under Section 33 ofID Act. The Hon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the writ petition has been dismissed and it has also been directed that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filed in pursuance of the orders of theHon'ble Delhi High Court . The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances ofthis case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature of the contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers. The interim relief under Section 33 of the ID Act is simply applicable when the status of service has been changed after filing of the case under the Industrial Disputes Act. As such, under Section 33 of the ID Act, only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filed under the ID Act . I am of the view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-11-03.

ORDER

The application of the applicants is allowed. The Management is directed to set aside the order dt.

1496 GI/2004-22 2498

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004 /JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

1. L.C.A. No. 03/2004-Neeraj Sharma Versus C.C.I.

2. L.C.A. No. 04/2004 Sriniwas Kumar Versus C.C.I.

3. L.C.A. No. 05/ 2004- A. K. Tripathi Versus C.C.I.

4. L.C.A. No. 06/2004-Satyender Singh Versus C.C.I.

5. L.C.A. No. 07/2004-Anil Kumar Versus C.C.L 13-11-2003 and 25-11-2003 and restore the services of the complainants and maintain status quo till the industrial dispute case is decided . The applicants are also entitled to get the wages as they had been getting either as contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2003 . The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases referred to above and a copy of the order be placed in all the LCA Cases.

6, L: C.A. No. 08/2004-Chabilal Versus C.C.I. Dated: 18-03-2004 .

7. L.C.A. No. 09/2004-Vikram Singh Versus C.C.I. R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer .

8. L.C.A. No. 10/2004-Anuj Kumar Versus C.C.I. नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004

9. L.C.A. No. 11 /2004-Vinay Kumar.Versus C.C.J.

10. L.C.A. No. 12/2004-Rajesh Singh Versus C.C.I.

11. L.C.A. No. 13/2004 Bipin Keshari Versus C.C.I. का. आ. 1222.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारोंके बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक. अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II, के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 07/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs . So they can be decided by common findings and a common, order . So all the LCAs are taken together. The facts of all the LCAs are the same. As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above cited below:-

[सं. एल-29025/10/2004- आई.आर. ( विविध) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 29th April, 2004

S.O. 1222.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 07/04) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn . of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government : on 28-04-2004 ,

[No. L- 29025 /10/2004 - IR(M) ]

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute has been raised by them for regubrisation of their services inthe Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter referred to as CCI as short) . The Industrial Dispute a is pending. The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit of the CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years . CCI has , always been in perennial and permanent need ofthe complainant's services . They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision of the mana ment of the CCI . They have been treated as dailywagers and denied regularisation of their services . The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees.

B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE

It is submitted that CCl has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was , therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/ so called contract labourer as contractor for distributing wages , payments etc. to the complainants .

NEW DELHI

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAL

L. C. A. NO . 02/04

It has been further submitted that after 31-03-1999, the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor .

In the Matter of:

R. K. THAKUR

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

It has been further submitted that they have filed the writ petition in the Hon'ble High Court . The writ petition was, dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preglude , fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator .

Along with this L.CALCA. Nos. 03/2004 to 13/2004 have been filed whose details are cited below:--.

It has been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and Others Versus National Union Water Front भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute.

Workers and Others 2001 (7) SCC 1 for regularisation ofthe contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters .

The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) , New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

That it wouldbe decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises.

It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed. The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently. On 1-9-2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractor andplaced the complainants on the roll of such new labour contractor . Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor, the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

That the management is playing unfair and dialatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. That even if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA. Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution , but also denied them, their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution. The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour.

That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI . However , the management, seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letterdt. 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure' A' Further, the management vide their letter dt. 25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working in the CCI. The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure 'B ' .

It has been further submitted that the contract has been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour areout of employment . The management did so deliberately `as Industrial dispute was pending before Tribunal .

Being aggrieved by the action of the management, a writpetition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017 /2004 and titled as B. K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and Others. The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations :-

The copy ofthe above cited observation is annexed as Annexure ' C ' .

TheManagement has filed reply. In their reply, it has been stated that there is 100% share of the company and the CCI has been declared a sick company by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996. Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) , Act, 1985. It has been shown by Annexure 'A' . There is a ban on further employment/recruitment in all units spread over country including headquarters ete. At the time of audit of the replying management they, have also objected to continuation of the contract labour as per Annexure "B- 1" The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allégedly employed. The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt . The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got . The employees are not the employee of the CCI but they are the contract labourers of M/ s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has direct control over the contractors. The paras of the application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc . work on contract basis. They have not been working in the industry. TheirTheir isis notnot masterma and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant. There is no notification under Section 10 of CLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without jurisdiction . The Government has to decide to close the unit . There is no violation of 33 ( 1 ) ( a) of the ID Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI . They have no case . The application is misconceived.

It has been further submitted that the management has expressly violated the provisions of Section 33 ( 1) (a) 2500

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it cangive proper relief to the aggrieved workmen .

It was argued from the side of the workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances of the case to the employees . The principal question is whether the employees are the contract labourers or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised. The contract of Shri Umesh KumarGupta and the contract ofShri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated.

In 1994 ( 5) SCC , 304, it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years subsequently continued in employment on account of interim orders of the court for a further period of about 8 years, they should be absorbed. The Hon'ble ' Supreme 'Court has observed in this case that principal employers while renewing the contract should retain the old employees. In fact , such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source ofthe livelihood of the contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer. In case , the contract labourers through the contractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence .

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999 , the contract has been terminated: It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI . As per letter dated 7-7-1995 , 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing. It was argued from the side of the management that management has got the certificate for engagement ofthe contract labourers. The licence of Shri R. P. Shahi , Shri Kapil Garg , Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg . Pvt . Ltd. has been filed. It relates to 01-02-2003 . This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited. The list of contractors have been given. They are 17 in numbers . There is order from the Hon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioners with other contract of casual labourers .

: Ithas been argued from the side of the management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they have been continuously working in the DCGU Unit under the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract, the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representative ofthe opposite party. No such register has been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in the presence of the representative of the management. Incase there is a contract, there must be an agreement that what amount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers. No such sort of papers have been annexed with the record. No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the employees or contract labourers .

The learned counsel for the management drew my attention to 1960 ( 1 ) SCR 806 , 1994 (5 ) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1 , 1961 ( 2 ) SCR. 590. I have gone through the rulings . The first is regarding pen down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances of the case . It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention of Section 33 of the ID Act . Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could still justify the impugned dismissal on merits . There is no difference in this regard between reference under Section 10 of the ID Act or a dispute under Section 33 ( a) of the ID Act, as such notification under Section 10 of the ID Act is not essential . There is no force in the contention of the learned advocate from the side of the management .

In SCC 1960 (1 ) page 830 , it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 of the Act. It has been further held that Sections 33 and 33A do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement. So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

ORDER

Dated: 18-03-2004

R. N. RAI, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004 paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece ofwork through contract labour has been filed and it has notbeen shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer. In such cases, the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he gives payment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they have been made contract labourers under the camouflage or smoke screen of several contractors but they have worked for a long period and some of the workers have nowbecome old and about 45 to 50 years of age . It amounts to unfair labour practice by the management and its owing to the mis - management of the principal employer that the unithas become sick.

का. आ. 1223. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 06/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

[सं. एल-29025/11/2004- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ] New Delhi , the 29th April , 2004

S.O. 1223. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 06/04) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn . of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-04-2004.

[No. L- 29025/ 11/2004- IR(M) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEW DELHI

LC.A. NO.02/2004

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAL

In the Matter of:

R.K. THAKUR

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA FINDINGS

Aletter dated 09.06.2003 has been filed. It has been written in this letter that the workers have been working for a long time and they are the workmen of the principal employer . This letter has not been denied by the management . It is true that in the interim relief, the entire reliefof Section 33 - A cannot be given under Section 33 of the Act. My attention was also drawn to. 1995 (4) JТ 262 , JT 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438, 2001 (7) JT- 268 . In these cases , if the contract is found sham and not genuine , than the contract labourers can raise Industrial Dispute . This view has been re-affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in JT 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438. My attention has also been drawn to Hussainbhai Calicut's case ( supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation case and Standard Vacuums Case , it has been held that notification under Section 10-A ofCLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Section 33 of ID Act. The Hon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the writ petition has been dismissed and it has also been directed that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filed in pursuance of the orders ofthe Hon'ble Delhi High Court . The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances of this case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature ofthe contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers . The interim relief under Section 33 of the ID Act is simply applicable when the status of service has been changed after filing of the case under the Industrial Dispute Act . As such , under Section 33 of the ID Act, only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filedunder the ID Act. I am of the view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-11-03.

Along with this L.C.A. , L.C.A. Nos . 03/2004 to 13/2004 have been filed whose details are cited below :-

2502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

1. L.C.A. No. 03/2004- Neeraj Sharma Versus C.C.I. 2. L.C.A. No. 04/2004 Sriniwas Kumar Versus C.C.I. 3. L.C.A. No. 05/2004-A.K . Tripathi Versus C.C.I. 4. L.C.A. No. 06/2004 Satyender Singh Versus C.C.I. 5. L.C.A. No. 07/2004 Anil Kumar Versus C.C.I. 6. L.C.A. No. 08/2004-Chabilal Versus C.C.I. 7. L.C.A. No. 09/2004-Vikram Singh Versus C.C.I. 8. L.C.A. No. 10/2004-Anuj Kumar Versus C.C.I. 9. L.C.A. No. 11 /2004-Vinay Kumar Versus C.C.I. 10. L.C.A. No. 12/2004-Rajesh Singh Versus C.C.I. 11. L.C.A. No. 13/2004 Bipin Keshari Versus C.C.I. Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs . So they can be decided by common findings and a common order. So all the LCAs are taken together , The facts of all the LCAs are the same. As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above are cited below:-

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute Act has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter referred to as CCI as short) . The Industrial Dispute Act is pending . The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit of the CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years . CCI has always been in perennial and permanent need ofthe complainant's services . They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision of the management of the CCI . They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation oftheir services . The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees .

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 ofthe Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was , therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/ so called contract labourer as contractor for distributing wages, payments etc. to the complainants.

It has been further submitted that after 31.03.1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such.labour contractor.

It has been further submitted that they have filed the writ petition in the Hon'ble High Court. The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude, fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

It has been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and Others Versus National Union Water Front Workers and Others 200I (7) SCC I for regularisation of the contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed. The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently . On 1.9.2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractor andplaced the complainants on the roll of such new labour contractor. Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor , the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

גי That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued towork in the establishment of CCI . However, the management, seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants, designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter dt. 13.11.2003 which has been annexed as Annexure ' A' Further, the management vide their letter dt. 25.11.2003 restrained the complainants from working in the CCI . The letter dated 25.11.2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure ' B ' .

Being aggrieved by the action ofthe management , a writ petition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017/ 2004 and titled as B. K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and Others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations :

" I am conscious that a large number of cases are pending before the Labour Court, but as far as the present case.is concerned , it is directed that the petitioners moving an application for interinr relief under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 same shall be heard and decided within a period of8weeks of its being filed. Grievance that pending salaries have not been paid would also be decided. The IndustrialTribunal would look into this aspect ofthe matter at the stage ofpreliminary hearing of the application when filed by the petitioners..... " The copy of the above cited observation is annexed as Annexure 'C' .

It has been further submitted that the management has expressly violated the provisions of Section 33 ( 1) ( a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute.

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprive of their work and they may not claim regularisation. That the actión ofthe management is against the provisions of 33 (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2503

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

Thatit would be decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises.

That the management is playing unfair and dialatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. That even if it is held that they were under the contractor , still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA . Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution , but also denied them , their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution . The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour.

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999 , the contract has been terminated. It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI .As per letter dated 7-7-1995, 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing. It was argued from the side ofthe management thatmanagement has got the certificate for engagement of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R. P. Shahi , Shri Kapil Garg, Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg. Pvt. Ltd. has been filed. It relates to 01-02-2003 . This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractorwas engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited. The list of contractors have been given . They are 17 in numbers. There is order from the Hon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioners with other contract ofcasual labourers.

The learned counsel for the management drew may attention to 1960 ( 1) SCR 806, 1994 ( 5) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1 , 1961 (2) SCR 590. I have gone through the rulings. The first is regarding pen down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances of the case . It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention of Section 33 of the ID Act. Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could still justify the impugned dismissal on merits . There is no different in thisregard between reference under Section 10 of the ID Act or a dispute under Section 33 ( a) of the ID Act, as such notification under Section 10 of the ID Act is not essential . There is no forces in the contention of the learned advocate from the side of the management .

The Management has filed reply. In their reply, it has been stated that there is 100 % share of the company and the CCI has been declared a sick company by the Board Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996. Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies ( Special Provisions) , Act, 1985. It has been shown by Annexure ' A' . There is a ban on further employment/ recruitment in all units spread over country including headquarters etc. At the time of audit of the replying management they , have also objected to continuation of the contract labour as per Annexure "B - 1 " . The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed . The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt . The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got . The employees are not the employee of the CCI but they are the contract labourers of M/ s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has direct control over the contractors . The paras of the application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc . work on contractbasis. They have not been working in the industry. Their is not master and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant . There is no notification under . Section 10 of CLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without jurisdiction. The Government has to decide to close the unit . There is no violation of 33 ( 1 ) (a) ofthe ID Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI . They have no case. The application is misconceived.

In SCC 1960 (1 ) page 830 , it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 ofthe Act . It has been further held that Section 33 and 33Ado not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement. So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it ' cangiveproper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record..

In 1994 ( 5 ) SCC , 304 , it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years subsequently continued in employment on account of interim orders of the court for a further period of about 8 years, they should be absorbed. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in this case that principal employers while renewing the contract should retain the old employees . In fact, such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source ofthe livelihood of the contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of It was argued from the side of the workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances of the case to the employees. The principle question is whether the employees are the contract labourer or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised . The contract of Shri Umesh KumarGupta and the contract of Shri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated.

2504

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] principal employer. In case, the contract labourers through the contractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen , it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence.

or smokescreen of several contractors but they have worked for a long period and some of the workers have nowbecome old and about 45 to 50 years ofage . It amounts to unfair labour practice by the management and its owing to the mis -management of the principal employer that the unit has become sick.

Ithas been argued from the side of the management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they havebeen continuously working in the DCGU UNIT under the smokescreen or camoaglage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract, the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence ofthe representative ofthe opposite party. No such register has been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too inthepresenpresence of the representative of the management. In case there is a contract, there must be an agreement that what amount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers . No such sort ofpapers have been annexed with the record. No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers .

Itwas further argued from the side ofthe management that in case, the workmen of the contract labourers, then the contractor must have received, money by cheque and they would have distributed the wages of the contract labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement between the principle employer and the contractor for doing work on a certain amount . It simply indicates that the names of the contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked for almost 20 years under the camouflage or smokescreen of contract labourers . The management has done it deliberately so that they may not become the employees of the principal employer and the management has mis- managed the entire unit so that it has become sick.

A letter dated 9-6-2003 has been filed . It has been writteninthis letter that the workers have been working for a long time and they are the workmen of the principle employer. This letter has not been denied by the management. It is true that in the interim relief, the entire reliefof33 -Acannot be given under Section 33 of theAct. My attention was also drawn to 1995 (4 ) JT 262, jt 2000 (1 ) SC 438 , 2001 (7) JT- 268. In these cases , ifthe contract is found sham and not genuine, than the contract labourers canraise Industrial dispute . This view has been re -affirmed by the Hon'ble APEX Court in JT 2000 (1 ) SC 438. My attention has been also been drawn to Hussainbhai Calicut's case (supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation case and Standard Vaccums Case , it has been held that notification under Section 10- A of CLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Secrtion 33 of ID Act. The Hon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the writ petition has been dismissed and it has also been directed that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filed in pursuance of the orders of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court . The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances of this case as there isno single evidence regarding the contract and the nature ofthe contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers. The interim reliefunder Section 33 of the ID Act is simply applicable whenthe status of service has been changed after filing of thecase under the Industrial Dispute Act. As such , under Section 33 of the ID Act, only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filedunder the ID Act. I am of the view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Actand make payments for the period onward 25-11-03.

ORDER

Dated: 18-03-2004

It was further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case of contract labour , there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and the principal employer that the contractors will do a certain piece ofworkwithin a certain specified period and he will get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers . But not even a single paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer . In such cases, the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he give payment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they have been made contract labourers under the camouglage

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2505

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004 '

7. L.C.A. No. 09/2004 - Vikram SinghVersus CCI

8. L.C.A. No. 10/2004 - Anuj Kumar Versus CCI

9. L.C.A. No. 11/2004 - Vinay Kumar Versus CCI

10. L.C.A. No. 12/2004 - Rajesh SinghVersus CCI

11. L.C.A. No. 13/2004 - Bipin Keshari Versus CCI का. आ. 1224.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 05/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -29025/ 12/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th April , 2004

S.O. 1224. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 05/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn . of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 28-04-04.

[No. L- 29025/12/2004- IR(M)] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute Act has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India ( as in hereafter referred to as CCI as short) . The Industrial Dispute Act is pending . The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit ofthe CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years. CCI has always been in perennial and permanent need of the complainant's services . They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision of the management of the CCI . They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation of their services. The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that ofregular employees .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL : CUM- LABOUR-COURT - IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition ) Act , 1970 (CLRA) Act in short of employ contract labourers . The CCI was , therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/ so called contract labourer as contractor for distributing wages , payments etc. to the complainants.

L.C.A.NO. 02/04

In the Matter of :-

It has been further submitted that after 31-03-1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

R. K. THAKUR

VERSUS

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

Along with this L.C.A. , L.C.A. Nos. 03/2004 to 13 / 2004 have been filed whose details are cited below :-

Ithas been further submitted that they have filed thewrit petition in the Hon'ble High Court. The writ petition wås dismissed on the ground of maintainability . The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude, fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

1. L.C.A. No. 03/2004 - Neeraj Sharma Versus CCI

2. L.C.A. No. 04/2004 - Sriniwas Kumar Versus CCI

3. L.C.A. No. 05/2004 - A. K. Tripathi Versus CCI

4. L.C.A. No. 06/2004 - Satyender Singh Versus CCI

Ithas been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and others Versus National Union Water FrontWorkers and others 2001 (7) SCC 1 for regularisation of the contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters.

5. L.C.A. No. 07/2004 - Anil Kumar Versus CCI

The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , New 6. L.C.A. No. 08/2004 - Chabilal Versus CCI

1496 GI/2004-23 2506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made .

of the management is against the provisions of 33 (a) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.

Thatitwouldbe decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act , they have been forced not to enter the premises .

Ithas been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed. The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently. On 1-9-2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractor and placed the complainants on the roll of such new labour contractor . Even after the appointment ofthe new labour contractor, the management deliberately. refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

That the management is playing unfair and dialatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation . That even if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA . Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution , but also denied them, their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution . The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour:

That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI . However the management, seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter date 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure ' A' . Further, the management vide their letter date 25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working in the CCI. The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure ' B ' .

It has been further submitted that the contract has. been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour are out of employment. The management did so deliberately as Industrial dispute was pending before Tribunal .

Being aggrieved by the action of the management , a writ petition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017/2004 and titled as B. K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations :-

" I am conscious that a large number of cases are pending before the Labour Court, but as far as the present case in concerned, it is directed that the petitioners moving an application for interim relief under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 same shall be heard and decided within a period of 8 weeks of its being filed. Grievance that pending salaries have not been paid would also be decided . The Industrial Tribunal would look into this aspect of the matter at the stage of preliminary hearing of the application when filed by the petitioners.

The copy of the above cited observation is annexed as Annexure ' C' .

The management has filed reply. In their reply, it has been stated that there is 100% share of the company and the CCI has been declared a sick company by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996. Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies. (Special Provisions ) , Act, 1985. It has been shown by Annexure ' A' . There is a ban on further employment/recruitment in all units spread over country including headquarters etc. At the time of audit of the replying management they, have also objected to continuation of the contract labour as per Annexure " B- 1 " . The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed. The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt. The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got . The employees are not the employee of the CCI but they are the contract labourers ofM/s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has direct control over the contractors. The paras ofthe application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc. work on contract basis . They have not been working in the industry. There is not master and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant . There is no notification under Section 10 of CLRA ACT in this case and the proceedings are without jurisdiction . The Government has to decide to close the unit . There is no violation of 33 ( 1 ) (a) of the ID Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI . They have no case. The application is misconceived.

It has been further submitted that the management has expressly violated the provisions of Section 33 ( 1 ) (a) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act , 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprive of their work and they may not claim regularisation. That the action

Itwas argued from the side of the workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2507

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances of the case to the employees . The principle question is whether the employees are the contract labourer or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised . The contract of Shri Umesh KumarGupta and the contract of Shri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated.

In 1994 (5) SCC , 304 , it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years subsequently continued in employment on account of interim orders of the court for a further period of about 8 years , they should be absorbed. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in this case that principal employers while renewing the contract should retain the old employees. In fact, such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source of the livelihood of the contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer . In case , the contract labourers through the contractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence .

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999 , the contract has been terminated. Itindicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI . As per letter date 7-7-1995 , 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing . It was argued from the side of the management that management has got the certificate for engagement of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R.P. Shahai , Shri Kapil Garg, Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg. Pvt. Ltd. has been filed. It related to 01-02-2003 . This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited. The list of contractors have been given. They are 17 in numbers . There is order from the Hon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioner with other contract of casual labourers .

It has been argued from the side of the management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they havebeen continuously working in the DCGU UNIT under the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract , the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representative ofthe opposite party,No such register has been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in thepresence of the representative of the management . Incase there is a contract, there must be an agreement that what amount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers. No such sort ofpapers have been annexed with the record . No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers .

The learned counsel for the management drew my attention to 1960 ( 1 ) SCR 806, 1994 (5) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1 , 1961 (2 ) SCR 590. I have gone through the rulings . The first is regarding pin down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances of the case . It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention of Section 33 of the ID ACT. Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could still justify the impugned dismissal on merits . There is no different in this regard between reference under Section 10. of the ID ACT or a dispute under Section 33 (a) of the ID ACT, as such notification under Section 10 of the ID ACT is not essential . There is no forces in the contention ofthe learned advocate from the side of the management .

It was further argued from the side of the management that in case , the workmen of the contract labourers, then the contractor must have received , money by cheque and they would have distributed the wages of the contract labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement between the principle employer and the contractor for doing work on a certain amount . It simply indicates that the names ofthe contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked for almost 20 years under the camouflage or smokescreen of contract labourers . The management has done it deliberately so that they may not become the employees of the principal employer and the management has mismanaged the entire unit so that it has become sick .

Itwas further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case of contract labour, there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and the principal employer that the contractors will do a certain piece ofwork within a certain specified period and he will get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers . But not even a single In SCC 1960 (1 ) page 830 , it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 of the Act. It has been further held that Section 33 and 33 A do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement. So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it can give proper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

2508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22 , 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-11-03 .

ORDER

The application of the applicants is allowed . The Management is directed to set aside the order dt . 13-11-2003 and 25-11-2003 and restore the services of the complainants and maintain status quo till the industrial dispute case is decided. The applicants are also entitled to get the wages as they had been getting either as contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2003. The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases referred to above and a copy of the order be placed in all the LCA Cases.

Dated: 18-03-2004.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer. In such cases, the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he gives payment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they have been made contract labourers under the camouflage or smokescreen of several contractors but they have worked for a long period avoid some of the workers have nowbecome old and about 45 to 50 years ofage . It amounts to unfair labour practice by the management and its owing to the mis - management of the principal employer that the unithas become sick .

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004

का०आ० 1225.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पो . ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 04/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं ० एल-29025/ 13/2004- आई० आर० ( विविध ) ] बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th April , 2004

S.O. 1225.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 04/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn . of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-04-2004 .

[No. L-29025/ 13/2004 -IR(M)] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT - II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAL

Aletter dated 09-06-2003 has been filed . It has been written in this letter that the workers have been working for a long time and they are the workmen of the principle employer. This letter has not been denied by the management . It is true that in the interim relief, the entire relief of 33 -A cannot be given under Section 33 of the Act. My attention was also drawn to 1995 (4) JТ 262 , JT 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438 , 2001 ( 7) JT- 268 . In these cases , if the contract is found sham and not genuine , than the contract labourers can raise Industrial dispute . This view has been re -affirmed by the Hon'ble APEX Court in JT 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438. My attention has been also been drawn to Hussainbhai Calicut's case (supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation case and Standard Vaccums Case , it has been held that notification under Section 10 - A of CLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Section 33 of ID Act. The Hon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the writ . petition has been dismissed and it has also been directed that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filed in pursuance of the orders ofthe Hon'ble Delhi High Court . The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances of this case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature of the contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers . The interim relief under Section 33 of the ID Act is simply applicable when the status of service has been changed after filing of the case under the Industrial Dispute Act. As such , under Section 33 of the ID Act, only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filed under the ID Act. I am of the view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services

L. C. A. NO . 02/04 2509

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Inthe Matter of:

R. K. THAKUR

Ithas been further submitted that after 31.03.1999 , the CCI introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

Along with this L.C.A. , L.C.A. Nos . 03/2004 to 13/2004 have been filed whose details are cited below:-

It has been further submitted that they have filed the writpetition in the Hon'ble High Court . The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude, fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

1. L.C.A. No. 03/2004-Neeraj SharmaVersus C.C.I.

2. L.C.A. No. 04/2004 Sriniwas Kumar Versus C.C.I.

3. L.C.A. No. 05/2004-A.K. TripathiVersus C.C.I.

4. L.C.A. No. 06/2004-Satyender Singh Versus C.C.I.

It has been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and others Versus National Union Water Front Workers and others 2001 (7) SCC 1 for regularisation of the contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters.

5. L.C.A. No. 07/2004-Anil Kumar Versus C.C.I.

6. L.C.A. No. 08/2004 Chabilal Versus C.C.I.

7. L.C.A. No. 09/2004-Vikram SinghVersus C.C.I.

The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

8. L.C.A. No. 10/2004-Anuj Kumar Versus C.C.I.

9. L.C.A. No. 11 /2004-Vinay KumarVersus C.C.I.

10. L.C.A. No. 12/2004-Rajesh Singh Versus C.C.I.

11. L.C.A. No. 13/2004 Bipin Keshari Versus C.C.I.

It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed . The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given. differently. On 1.9.2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractor and. placed the complainants on the roll of such new labour contractor. Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor, the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs . So they can be decided by common findings and a common order. So all the LCAs are takentogether. The facts of all the LCAs are the same . As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above are cited below:-

That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued towork in the establishment of CCI . However, the management, seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter dt. 13.11.2003 which has been annexed as Annexure ' A' Further, the management vide their letter dt. 25.11.2003 restrained the complainants from working in the CCI . The letter dated 25.11.2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure 'B ' .

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute Act has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter referred to as CCI as short) . The Industrial Dispute Act is pending. The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit of the CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years . CCI has always been in perennial and permanent need of the complainant's services . They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision ofthe management of the CCI . They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation of their services . The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees.

Ithas been further submitted that the contract has been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour are out ofemployment . The management did so deliberately asIndustrial dispute was pending before Tribunal .

Being aggrieved by the action of the management, a writ petition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017/2004 and titled as B.K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations :-

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers . The CCI was, therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/so called contract labourer as contractor for distributing wages , payments etc. to the complainants .

2510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/ JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] "I am conscious that a large number of cases are pending before the Labour Court, but as far as the present case is concerned , it is directed that the petitioners moving an application for interim relief under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 same shall be heard and decided within a period of8 weeks of its being filed. Grievance that pending salaries have not been paid would also be decided. The Industrial Tribunal would look into this aspect ofthe matter at the stage of preliminary hearing of the application when filed by the petitioners....."

The copy of the above cited observation is annexed as Annexure ' C' .

for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed . The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt . The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got . The employees are not the employees of the CCI but they are the contract labourers ofM/s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited. He has direct control over the contractors . The paras of the application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc . work on contractbasis. They have not been working in the industry. Their is no master and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant. There is no notification under. Section 10 of CLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without jurisdiction. The Government has to decide to close theunit. There is no violation of Section 33 ( 1) (a) of the I.D. Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI. They have no case . The application is misconceived .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

That it wouldbe decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises.

Itwas argued from the side ofthe workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the facts and circumstances of the case to the employees . The principle question is whether the employees are the contract labourer or they are the employees of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised . The contract of Shri Umesh Kumar Gupta and the contract of Shri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated.

That the management is playing unfair and dialatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. That even if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA . Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given livelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution, but also denied them, their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution. The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour.

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition hasno force as in 1999, the contract has been terminated. It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI. As per letter date 7-7-1995, 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is cement grinding and packing . It was argued from the side of the management that management has got the certificate for engagement of the contract labourers . The licence of Shri R. P. Shahi , Shri Kapil Garg, Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engg. Pvt . Ltd. Has been filed. It relates to 01-02-2003 . This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited. The list of contractors have been given . They are 17 in numbers . There is order from the Hon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioners with other contract of casual labourers .

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

2511 to the facts and circumstances of the case . It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention of Section 33 of the ID Act . Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could still justify the impugned dismissal on merits . There is no different in this regard between reference under Section 10 of the ID Act or a dispute under Section 33 (a) of the ID Act, as such notification under Section 10 of the ID Act is not essential . There is no forces in the contention ofthe learned advocate from the side of the management . :

In SCC 1960 (1 ) page 830, it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourse to Section 10 ofthe Act . Ithas been further held that Section 33 and 33A do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement . So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer. In case of the action being found unjustified, it cangiveproper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

In 1994 (5 ) SCC, 304, it has been held that contract labourer engaged for long period from 10 to 20 years subsequently continued in employment on account of interim orders of the court for a further period of about 8 years , they should be absorbed. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in this case that principal employers while renewing the contract should retain the old employees . In fact , such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source ofthe livelihood of the contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer. In case, the contract labourers through the contractor have been employed in a mere camouflage and the smokescreen, it has to be established by the contract labourers after giving evidence .

Itwas further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case of contract labour, there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and the principal employer that the contractors will do a certain piece of work within a certain specified period and he will get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers. But not even a single paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer. In such cases, the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he gives payment to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque, is handed over to him and it is the bounded duty of the representative of the management to see that the contract labourers are getting minimum wages . These circumstances show and go a long way to prove that the workmen applicants are initially not the contract labourers but they have been made contract labourers under the camouflage or smokescreen of several contractors but they have worked for a long period and some of the workers have nowbecome old and about 45 to 50 years of age . It amounts to unfair labour practice by the management and its owing to the mis -management of the principal employer that the unithas become sick.

Ithas been argued from the side of the management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they have been continuously working in the DCGU UNIT under the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract , the names of the each contractors have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representative ofthe opposite party. No such register has been produced. They must get their wages through the contractor and that too in the presence of the representative of the management. In case there is a contract, there must be an agreement that what amount isto be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers . No such sort of papers have been annexed with the record. No paper hasbeen annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004 /JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 29th April, 2004

S.O. 1226.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 03/04) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn. of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-04-2004 .

[No. L- 29025/ 14/2004- IR(M)] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT - IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

L. C. A. NO . 02/04

Presiding Officer: R. N. RAL

Corporation case and Standard Vaccums Case, it has been held that notification under Section 10- A of CLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Section 33 of ID Act. The Hon'ble High Court has directed that the applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the writ petition has been dismissed and it has also been directed that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The, application has been filed in pursuance of the orders of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court . The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances of this case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature of the contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers . The interim reliefunder Section 33 of the ID Act is simply applicable when the status of service has been changed after filing of the case under the Industrial Dispute Act . As such , under Section 33. of the ID Act, only status quo can be restored. Whether the applicants are contract labour or the employees of the management will be decided in the case filed under the ID Act. I am of the view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-11-03,

IntheMatter of:

ORDER

R.K. THAKUR

Versus

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA

FINDINGS

Along with this L.C.A.. L.C.A. Nos . 03/2004 to 13/ 2004 have been filed whose details are cited below :-

1. L.C.A. No. 03/2004- Neeraj Sharma Versus C.C.I. The application of the applicants is allowed . The Management is directed to set aside the order dt . 13-11-2003 and 25-11-2003 and restore the services of the complainants and maintain status quo till the industrial dispute case is decided. The applicants are also entitled to get the wages as they had been getting either as contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2003. The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases referred to above and a copy of the order be placed in all the LCA Cases.

2. L.C.A. No. 04/2004 Sriniwas Kumar Versus C.C.I. Dated: 18-03-2004.

3. L.C.A. No. 05/2004-A.K. Tripathi Versus C.C.I.

4. L.C.A. No. 06/2004-Satyender Singh Versus C.C.I. R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

5. L.C.A. No. 07/2004-Anil Kumar Versus C.C.I. नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2004

6. L.C.A. No. 08/2004-Chabilal Versus C.C.I.

7. L.C.A. No. 09/2004-Vikram Singh Versus C.C.I.

8. L.C.A. No. 10/ 2004-Anuj Kumar Versus C.C.I.

9. L.C.A. No. 11 / 2004-Vinay Kumar Versus C.C.I.

10. L.C.A. No. 12/2004 Rajesh Singh Versus C.C.I.

11. L.C.A. No. 13/2004 Bipin Keshari Versus C. C.I. का. आ. 1226.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कॉर्पों. ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली- II , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 03/04) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-29025/14/ 2004- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ]

Similar facts and circumstances are involved in all the LCAs. So they can be decided by common findings and a common order. So all the LCAs are taken together बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव 2513

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

The facts of all the LCAs are the same . As such the facts of the LCAs referred to above are cited below :-

That in the absence of any job order to the demarcated contractor, the complainants as usual were continued to work in the establishment of CCI . However, the management , seemingly scared about the fate of the pending industrial dispute going in favour of the complainants , designed an evil plan and suspended the contract awarded to the latest labour contractor vide labour contractor letter dt. 13-11-2003 which has been annexed as Annexure ' A' . Further, the management vide their letter dt. 25-11-2003 restrained the complainants from working in the CCI . The letter dated 25-11-2003 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure 'B ' .

The applicants have stated that Industrial Dispute has been raised by them for regularisation of their services in the Cement Corporation of India (as in hereafter referred to as CCI as short) . The Industrial Dispute is pending . The complainants have been working at Delhi Cement Grinding Unit of the CCI in various capacities since last 8 to 17 years . CCI has always been in perennial and permanent need of the complainant's services. They have always performed work under the direct and effective supervision ofthe management of the CCI . They have been treated as daily wagers and denied regularisation of their services . The management has put them under the labour contractors and have extracted work from them that of regular employees.

Ithas been further submitted that the contract has been suspended indefinitely and the daily wager labour are out ofemployment. The management did so deliberately asIndustrial dispute was pending before Tribunal .

Being aggrieved by the action of the management , a writ petition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court which was listed as WP No. 990-1017 / 2004 and titled as B.K. Shukla Vs. Union of India and others . The Hon'ble High Court has made the following observations :-

It is submitted that CCI has never obtained the requisite certificate under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 ( CLRA) Act in short to employ contract labourers. The CCI was , therefore, employing a sham and dilatory tactic of appointing one of its employee/ so called contract labourer as contractor for distributingwages , payments etc. to the complainants.

Ithas been further submittedthat after 31-03-1999 , the CCl introduced the labour contractor system and put the complainants under such labour contractor.

"I am conscious that a large number of cases are pending before the Labour- Court, but as far as the present case is concerned, it is directed that the petitioners moving an application for interim relief under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 same shall be heard and decided within a period of8weeks of its being filed. Grievance that pending salaries have not been paid would also be decided. The Industrial Tribunal would look into this aspect ofthe matter at the stage of preliminary hearing of the application when filed by the petitioners....." Ithasbeen further submitted that they have filed the writ petition in the Hon ble High Court. The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of maintainability. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed the rejection of the writ petition would not preclude , fetter, restrict or affect the jurisdiction of the Industrial Adjudicator.

The copy of the above cited observation is annexed as Annexure ' C ' .

It has been further submitted that Steel Authority of India Limited and others Versus National Union Water Front Workers and others 2001 (7 ) SCC 1 for regularisation ofthe contract labourers has been directed and the Industrial Tribunal has also been directed to adjudicate upon such matters .

Ithas been further submitted that the management has expressly violated the provisions of Section 33 ( 1 ) (a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The status have been altered during the pendency of the dispute .

ر The complainants filed their statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central) , New Delhi for adjudication and thereafter the reference has been made.

That the management has deliberately suspended the contract so that the workers may be deprive of their work and they may not claim regularisation . That the action ofthe management is against the provisions of 33 (a) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ..

That it would be decided later on whether the workers are the daily wager workers or the labour contractors but they have been working in the CCI and after the dispute of the ID Act, they have been forced not to enter the premises.

That the management is playing unfair and dialatory tactics by delaying the proceedings before this Hon'ble It has been further submitted that several labour contractors have been appointed. The workers remained the same but the name of the contractor was given differently. On 1-9-2003 , CCI appointed another labour contractor and placed the complainants on the roll of such new labour contractor . Even after the appointment of the new labour contractor, the management deliberately refrained from assigning any specific job order to the newly appointed labour contractor.

1496 GI/2004-24 2514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

Kumar Gupta and the contract of Shri Hari Singh Contractor was also terminated.

Tribunal so that the workers may not get regularisation. That even if it is held that they were under the contractor, still they worked and the nature of the work was not within the definition of contract work under CLRA . Their suspension is illegal and the suspension of contract is also illegal . They should be given hvelihood as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution, but also denied them, their right to work as given under Article 40 of the Constitution . The management ought to have sought the permission of the Tribunal before suspending contract labour.

The counsel for the management argued that the company is a sick company since 1966 but this condition has no force as in 1999 , the contract has been terminated. It indicates that the work being carried out upto 1999. The management has also filed the licence for contract work in CCI . As per letter dated 7-7-1995 , 200 contract labourers have been employed and the nature of work is ceinent grinding and packing. It was argued from the side of the management that management has got the certificate for engagement ofthe contract labourers . The licence of Shri R. P. Shahi , Shri Kapil Garg , Shri Devender Singh and Shri Jai Bhawani Shivajı Engg . Pvt. Ltd. has been filed . It relates to 01-02-2003. This letter indicates that the work was being done that is why the contractor was engaged so there is no forces in the contention that the company is sick since 1966. Tenders have been invited . The list of contractors have been given, Theyre 17 in numbers. There is order from the Hon'ble High Court that respondents are restrained from substituting service of petitioners with other contract ofcasual labourers .

The Management has filed reply. In their reply , it has been stated that there is 100% share of the company and the CCI has been declared a sick company by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BFR) vide order dated 8-8-1996. Thus the present proceedings are liable to be stayed in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions ) , Act , 1985. It has been shown by Annexure 'A' . There is a banban on further employment/ recruitment in all units spread over country including headquarters etc. At the of audit of the replying management, they have also objected to continuation of the contract labour as per Annexure " B - 1 " . The DCGU unit at Delhi is also not doing any production for the last more than five years where the claimants are allegedly employed. The Corporation gets financial assistance from the Govt . The worker union has moved application that they are not willing to work in the industry but they must get VRS as other employees have got. The employees are not the employee of the CCI but they are the contract labourers of M/ s . Jai Bhawani Shivaji Engineers (P) Limited; He has direct control over the contractors . The paras of the application have been denied and it is alleged that the applicants have been engaged for misc . work on contract basis. They have not been working in the industry. There is no master and servant relationship between CCI and the applicant . There is no notification under.

The learned counsel for the management drew may attention to 1960 ( 1 ) SCR 806, 1994 (5) SCC 304, 2001 (7) SCC 1 , 1961 (2 ) SOR 590. I have gone through the rulings . The first is regarding pin down strike so it is not pertinent to the facts and circumstances of the case . It has been held in case of the Apex Court cited above that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal was not limited to enquiry as to contravention of Sion 33 of the ID Act. Even if such contravention was proved, the employer could stil justify the impugned dismissal on merits. There is no different in this regard between reference under Section 10 of the ID Act or a dispute under Section 33 (a ) of the ID Act, as such notification under Section 10 of the ID Act is not essential . There is no forces in the contention of the learned advocate from the side of the management.

Section 10 of CLRA Act in this case and the proceedings are without jurisdiction . The Government has to decide to close the unit . There is no violation of 33 ( 1 ) (a) of the ID Act as the claimants are not the employees of the CCI . They have no case . The application is misconceived,

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record.

In SCC 1960 ( 1 ) page 830 , it has been held that the applicants can move application under Section 33 without having recourseto Section 10 of the Act . It has been further held that Section 33 and 33 - Ado not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the tribunal finds that there has been violation of Section 33 , it must award reinstatement. So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is regarding abolition of condition of service and the tribunal can adjudicate upon the justifiability of the action of the employer . In case of the action being found unjustified, it can give proper relief to the aggrieved workmen.

It was argued from the side of the workman applicants that the Hon'ble High Court has directed to decide the case within 8 weeks and has also directed to give the reasonable relief in the factsfacts and circumstances of the case to the employees. The principal question is whether the employees are the contract labourer or they are the employces of the factory. A list has been filed in which 45% have been regularised. The contract of Shri Umesh

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

while renewing the contract should retain the old to the contract labourers and thereafter the cheque.Fis handed over, to him and it is the bounded puty of the representative of the management to see that the comract labourers are gatting minimuin wages. These bircumstances show and go a long way, to prove that the workamen applicants are initially not the contract labonnerabi have been made contract labourers under the camouflage or smokescreen of several contractors but they have worked fg, a long nha dame somesome of the workers have nowbecome old and about 45 to 50 years of age. It amounts tounfair labour practice 60 the management and its owing to the mis - management ofthe principal employer that the unit has becohle s

employees . In fact , such a condition is incorporated in the contract itself. It is to protect the continuance of the source of the livelihood of the contract labour but it does not give the right to the regularisation in the employment of principal employer . InIn contract labourers through the contractor have n in a mere camouflage and the smokescro the established by the contract labourers an vidence: It has been argued from the side of the management that the age of the workmen is about 40 years and they have been continuously working the DCGU UNIT under the smokescreen or camouflage of contract labourers but there is no papers regarding the agreement of contract , the names of the each contractors, have been given but no paper has been filed to show that the wages were given to the contract labourers in the presence of the representative ofthe opposite party. No son register has been produced They must get their wages through the conttitor tudi di too inthe presence of the representative of the fintagerment on In case there is a contract, there must be an agreementagreement thatthat what amount is to be paid to the contractor and how much wages the contractor would pay to the workers . No such sort of papers have been annexed with the record. No paper has been annexed regarding the payment by the contractor to the Employees or contract labourers .

Itwas further argued from the side of the management that in case , the workmen of the contragt labourers, then the contractor must have received, money brachers, Tollen they would have distributed the wages of the content labourers but the management has failed totally to file any such paper to show that there was an agreement betwee the principal employer and the contractor for doing work on a certain amount. It simply indicates that the names of the contractors have been given but the employees as contract labourers remained the same and they have worked for abot 20 years under the camouflage or smokescreon of contract labourers . The management has done it deliberately so that they may not become the employees of the principal employer and the management has mismanaged the entire unit so that it has become sick .

Силволичано 1006 has been tiled. It has been written in this letter that the workers have been working for a long time and they are the stikinen of the principal employer This she has not been denied by thể management. It is true that in the interim relief, the entire relief of Secton, 33 - A cannot be gon 33 A cannot be given under Section 33 the Act. My attention was also drawn to 1995 ( 4) ІТ 262 , ЈТ 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438 , 2001 ( 7 ) JT - 268 . In these cases , ifthe contract is found sham and not genuine , than the contract labourers can raise Industrial dispute. This view has been re - affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in JT 2000 ( 1 ) SC 438. My attention has been also drawn to Hussainbhai Calicut's case (supra) , and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation case and Standard Vaccums Case , it has been held that notification under Section 10 - A of CLRA Act is not necessary for filing application under Section 33 of ID. Act. The Hon Lichlinu Miểu bblei applicants may move the Industrial Tribunal and the wi petition has been dismisson and it has alsoalso been directed. that the application will be decided within 8 weeks . The application has been filedfiled in pursuance of the orders of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. The citations referred to by the management are not relevant to determine the application under Section 33. The citations filed by the workman are applicable in facts and circumstances of this case as there is no single evidence regarding the contract and the nature of the contract work and the agreement of contract work and the payment to the contract labourers. The interim relief under Section 33 of the ID Act is simply applicable when the status of service has been changed after filing of the case under the Industrial Dispute Act .Act . As such , under Section 33 of the ID Act , only status quo can be restored . Whether the applicants are contract labour on the tod willenboyees of themanagement will be decided in the case f the Act am of the view that the management should maintain the status quo and restore their services prior to filing the ID Act and make payments for the period onward 25-11-03

ORDER

The application of the applicants is allowed . The Management is directed to set aside the orderdt. 13-11-2003 It was further argued by the learned counsel of the workman that in case of contract labour , there is working order and there is agreement between the contractor and the principal employer that the contractors will dobertam picce ofwork within a certain specified period and he get for that work a certain some of amount to be given as wages to the contract labourers . But Hot even a single paper regarding any agreement for doing a piece of work through contract labour has been filed and it has not been shown even by paper that the labourers, received wages from the contractors and the contractor received money from the principal employer. In such cases the contractor receives money through a cheque and first he gives payment 2516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii)] and 25-11-2003 and restore the services of the complainants and maintain status quo till the industrial dispute case is decided . The applicants are also entitled to get the wages as they had been getting either as contract labourer or as employee from 25-11-2003 . The order is applicable to all the LCA Cases referred to above and a copy of the order be placed in all the LCA Cases .

प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 जून, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

Dated: 18-03-2004 .

R. N. RAI, Presiding Officer

"जिला तहसील एंव परंगना मथुरा में आने वाले राजस्व ग्राम-जयसिंहपुरा , बांगर, भैंसा, धानातेणा, इङ्गाव, बाद, महोली, मथुरा बांगर एवं गोविंदपुर" ।

नई दिल्ली, 5 मई, 2004

[सं. एस-38013/41/2004- एस . एस. - 1 ]

के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 5th May, 2004

का. आ. 1227.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 जून, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: -

" जिला शाहजहाँपुर, तहसील सदर, परगना जमौर में स्थित राजस्व ग्राम - रामपुर, इलाका अजीजगंज , पिपरौला, बन्धरा , नवादा- इन्देपुर तथा परगना सदर में स्थित राजस्व ग्राम रसूलपुर जदानगंज "।

S.O. 1228. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV [ except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Cha Vand VI (except sub -section ( i) of Section 76 and Sect 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought force] of the said Act shall come into force in the follow areas in the State ofUttar Pradesh namely:-

[सं. एस-38013/40/2004-एस. एस. - 1 ]

के. सी. जैन , निदेशक

New Delhi , the 5th May, 2004

"Areas comprising in the revenue villages Jaisingpura , Banger, Bhaisa, Dhanateja , Hargaon , B Maholi , Mathura Bangar and Govindpur of Pargana, Te and District Mathura ." 1

[No. S-38013 /41 /2004- SS: 1]

K. C. JAIN, Director

नई दिल्ली, 5 मई, 2004

S.O. 1227. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June, 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI ( except sub -section (i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely:-

का. आ. 1229. - कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियमा ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तिया का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 जून , 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय 4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: -

"Areas comprising in the revenue villages ofRampur, Ilaka Ajeejganj , Pipraula , Banthara , Nawada- Indepur of Pargana Jamaur and revenue villege of Rasoolpur Jadanganj ofPargana Sadar situated in the Tehsil Sadar District of Shahjahanpur. "

[No. S- 38013/40/2004- SS.I ]

K. C. JAIN, Director

"जिला तहसील एंव परगना सहारनपुर के राजस्व ग्राम- हसनपुर कदीम, मुल्लापुर मजबता, मवीकला, चुनहेटीगाड़ा, कांकरकुई, मनानी, मोहनपुरगाडा, मिल्कवजीउदीनपुर एवं मनोहरपुर" ।

नई दिल्ली, 5 मई , 2004

[सं. एस-38013/42/2004- एस. एस.- 1 ]

के. सी. जैन, निर्देशक का. आ. 1228.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा। की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का 2517

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22, 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

NewDelhi , the 5th May, 2004

77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofUttar Pradesh namely:-

S.O. 1229. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter Vand VI (except sub- section (i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely:-

"Areas comprising the Revenue Villages of Bahlolpur , Kukaradev, Shadipur, Baidani , Sandila, Devpalpur, Hardaspur, Tajpur, Newada Undho , Newada Dasa, Newada Tathi , Dhookapur, Munderi , Kakupur Rawwan , Bairry, Barrajpur, Rajpur , Dubiyana, Pathakpur, Baharampur, Manpur, Indalpur -Shivrajpur, Jagri, Kharakpur, Dedupur, Hadayapur , Chaubeypur Kalan , Chaubeypur Makkhan, Nathupur, Chaudharipur, Vishunpur, Вага Pratappur , Naunha Kalan , Dariyanpur, Bithoor , Pachore, Laxamanpur, Budhanpur, Purauna , Bhikharipur, Uttari , Poora, Bibipur and Bilhaur in Pargana and Tehsil Bilhour in theDistrict of Kanpur. "

[No. S-38013/44/2004 -S.S.I ] "Areas comprising the revenue villages ofHassanpur Kadeem, Mullapur Majbuta, Mawikala, Chunhetigada, Kankarkui , Manani , Mohanpurgada, Milakwaziuddinpur and Manoharpur situated in Pargana, Tehsil and District Saharanpur. "

K. C. JAIN, Director [No. S- 38013/42/2004- S.S.I]

नई दिल्ली, 6 मई , 2004

K. C. JAIN, Director

नई दिल्ली, 6 मई , 2004

का. आ. 1231. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 जून, 2004 को उस तारीख केरूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77,78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्यके निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्: - का. आ. 1230.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 जून, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य केनिम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

"जिला वाराणसी की तहसील एंव परगना चन्दौली के अन्तर्गत आने वाले राजस्व ग्राम - रामनगर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, पठनवाँ, हमीदपुर, गोपालपुर, जिवनाथपुर एंव जिवधीपुर" ।

[सं. एस -38013/43/2004- एस . एस. - 1 ]

के. सी. जैन , निदेशक

New Delhi , the 6th May, 2004 "उत्तर प्रदेश के जिला कानपुर, तहसील एवं परगना बिल्हौर के अन्तर्गत आने वाले राजस्व ग्राम बहलोलपुर, कुकरादेव, शादीपुर, बैदानी, संडीला, देवपालपुर, हरदासपुर, ताजपुर, नेवादाउथो, नेवादा दासा, नेवादाताथी, ढूकापुर, मुडेरी , काकूपुर रव्वन, बेरी , बर्राजपुर , राजपुर, दुबियाना, पाठकपुर, बहरामपुर, मानपुर, इन्दलपुर- शिवराजपुर, जगरी, खरकापुर, देदूपुर, हदयपुर, चौबेपुर कलां, चौबपुर- मक्खन, नाथूपुर, चौधरीपुर, विशुनपुर, बारा प्रतापपुर, नुनहाकला, दरियानपुर बिठूर, पचौर, लक्ष्मणपुरु, बूढ़नपुर, पुरौना, भिखारीपुर, उत्तरी, पुरा , बीबीपुर एंव बिल्हौर " ।

[सं. एस-38013/44/2004-एस. एस.- 1 ]

के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

NewDelhi , the 6th May, 2004

S.O. 1231. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter Vand VI (except sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely:-

"Areas comprising the revenue villages of Ram Nagar Industrial area, Pathanava, Hamidpur, Gopalpur, Jivanathpur and Jivadhipur in Pargana and Tehsil Chandauli, District- Varanasi . "

[No. S-38013 /43 /2004 -S.S.I ]

K. C. JAIN , Director S.O. 1230.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter Vand VI (except sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 75 and Sections 2518

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 22, 2004/JYAISTHA 1 , 1926.

नई दिल्ली , 13 मई , 2004

का. आ. 1232.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 33 ग की उपधारा ( 2 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 के अंतर्गत श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार की दिनांक 22-4-2004 की अधिसूचना संख्या ए-11016 /5/ 2003- सी एल एस- II द्वारा गठित श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद को उस श्रम न्यायालय के रूप में विनिर्दिष्ट करता है जो वह राशि निर्धारित करेगा जिस पर गुजरात राज्य में और किसी उद्योग में नियोजित कर्मकारों के संबंध में जिसके लिए केन्द्र सरकार समुचित सरकार है । उक्त उप धारा में संदर्भित किसी लाभ की धनराशि के रूप में गणना की जाएगी।

[फाइल सं. ए-12030/2/ 2004- सीएलएस- II ]

वाई.पी. सहगल, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 13th May, 2004

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] ( 1 ) केन्द्र सरकार औद्योगिक

अधिकरण- I , चंडीगढ़

पंजाब , हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य और संघ राज्य क्षेत्र चंडीगढ़

(2) केन्द्र सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- I , दिल्ली केवल संघ राज्य क्षेत्र, दिल्ली । [फाइल सं . ए-12030/1/2004- सीएलएस- II ]

वाई.पी. सहगल, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 13th May, 2004

S.O. 1233.-In by Sub -section ( 2) of Se Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 specifies the Labour C the powers conferred Industrial Disputes Government hereby garh - II , constituted under Section 7 of the said Act by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour No. A-11016/ 7/2003 -CLS- II dated 23-3-2004 as the Labour Court which shall determine the amount at which any benefit referred to in that sub - section would be computed in terms ofmoney in relation to workmen employed in any industry in the State of Haryana (except the districts of Gurgaon andFaridabad) and Janamu and Kashmir, in respect of which the Central Government is the appropriate Government .

2. Consequent upon the fixation of the jurisdiction of the Labour Court of the COIT-cum- Labour Court - II , Chandigarh , the jurisdiction of the CGIT-cum- Labour Court- I, Chandigarh and the CGIT-cum-Labour Court - I, Delhi wouldbe as follows :

(1 ) CGIT - I, Chandigarh

S.O. 1232. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (2) of Section 33C of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby specifies the Labour Court, Ahmedabad, constituted under Section 7 of the said Act by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour No. A-11016/5/2003 -CLS - II dated 22-4-2004 as the Labour Court which shall determine the amount at which any benefit referred to in that sub - section would be computed in terms of money in relation to workmen employed in any industry in the State of Gujarat in respect of which the Central Government is the appropriate Government.

[F. No. A- 12030/2/2004-CLS- II ]

Y. P. SEHGAL, Under Secy.

The States of Punjab, Himachal Pradesh and the Union Territory of Chandigarh.

(2) CGF- I , Delhi

नईदिल्ली, 13 मई , 2004

का. आ. 1233.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 33 ग की उपधारा ( 2 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 के अंतर्गत श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार की दिनांक 23-3-2004 की अधिसूचना संख्या ए-11016/7/2003- सी एल एस- II द्वारा गठित श्रम न्यायालय , चंडीगढ- II को उस श्रम न्यायालय के रूप में विनिर्दिष्ट करता है जो वह राशि निर्धारित करेगा जिस पर हरियाणा ( गुड़गांव और फरीदाबाद जिलों को छोड़कर ) और जम्मूऔर कश्मीर राज्यों में किसी उद्योग में नियोजित कर्मकारों के संबंध में जिसके लिए केन्द्र सरकार समुचित सरकार है । उक्त उप धारा में संदर्भित किसी लाभ की धनराशि के रूप में गणना की जाएगी ।

2. के.स.औ. अधिकरण-सह- श्रम न्यायालय -II, चंडीगढ़ के श्रम न्यायालय के अधिकार क्षेत्र के निर्धारण के परिणामस्वरूप के. स.औ. अधिकरण- सह - श्रम न्यायालय -1, चंड़ीगढ़ और के.स.औ. अधिकरण- सह- श्रम न्यायालय-1 , दिल्ली का अधिकार क्षेत्र निम्नवत होगा :

The Union Territory ofDelhi only.

[F. No. A- 12030/ 1/2004 -CLS-II ]

Y.P. SEHGAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई, 2004

का. आ. 1234.- कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम, 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) की धारा 7 घ की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार इसके द्वारा श्री वी. के. जैन, दिल्ली उच्चतम न्यायायिक सेवा , को 22400- 24500/- रुपये के वेतनमान में कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि अपीलीय न्यायाधिकरण , नई दिल्ली के पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में पद का कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से अथवा 62 वर्ष की आयु पूर्ण होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , तदर्थ आधार पर दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए नियुक्तकरती है ।

[फाइल सं. ए-12026/4/ 2003 - एसएस -1 ]

संयुक्ता राय , अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 22 , 2004/ज्येष्ठ 1 , 1926

2519 New Delhi , the 13th May, 2004

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (vi) of clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act for a period of six months.

[F. No. S- 11017 /18/97 - IR(PL)]

J. P. PATI, Jt . Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 14 मई , 2004 S. O. 1234. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2 ) of Section 7D of the Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) , the Central Government hereby appoints Sh. V. K. Jain, Delhi Higher Judicial Service , as Presiding Officer of the Employees ' Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal , New Delhi in the pay scale ofRs . 22400-24500 for a period of two years on ad -hoc basis from the date of taking over charge of the post or till he attains the age of 62 years whichever is earlier.

[F. No. A- 12026/4/2003 -S.S. - I ] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 मई , 2004

का. आ. 1236.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट है कि लोकहित में ऐसा अपेक्षित है कि किसी भी तेल क्षेत्र में सेवाओं को जिसे औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 17 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है, उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए ।

अतः अब, औद्यागिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उपखण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

का. आ. 1235.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट है कि लोकहित में ऐसा अपेक्षित है भारत प्रतिभूति मुद्रणालय , नासिक रोड, में सेवाओं को जिसे औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 12 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है, उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए ।

[फा. सं. एस -11017/10/97- आई.आर. ( पी.एल. ) ]

'जे.पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th May, 2004 अतः अब, औद्यागिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उपखण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग की उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[फाइल सं. एस-11017/18/97 - आई.आर. ( पी.एल. ) ]

S.O. 1236.-Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest required that the services in the any Oil Fields which is covered by item 17 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , should be declared to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act .

जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th May, 2004

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (vi) of clause ( n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said.Act for a period of six months .

[F. No. S- 11017/ 10/97 -IR(PL) ] S.O. 1235. Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest required that the services in the India Security Press , Nashik Road which is covered by item 12 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , should be declared to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act .

J. P. PATI . Jt . Secy.

Mayapuri . New Delhi - 110064

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road, and Puhlished by the Controller of Publications . Delhi - 110054 .