This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

Os रजिस्ट्री सं० डी एल (एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. No. DL ( N) 04/0007/2003-05

जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 43 ]

No. 43 |

नई दिल्ली, अक्तूबर 17 अक्तूबर 23 , 2004, शनिवार/आश्विन 25-कार्तिक1 , 1926 NEW DELHI, OCTOBER 17- OCTOBER 23 , 2004, SATURDAY/ ASVINA 25- KARTIKA 1 , 1926 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग ।। - खण्ड 3-उप- खण्ड (ii) PART 11-Section 3-Sub - section (ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक

(ग्रामीण आयोजना और ऋण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 11 सितम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 2628.- भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक अधिनियम, 1934 ( 1934 का 2 ) की धारा 42 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के परंतुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और दिनांक 29 अप्रैल , 2003 की उनकी अधिसूचना ग्राआऋवि . सं. 973/07-02-05/2002-03 के अधिक्रमण में भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक एतद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करता है कि अनुसूचित राज्य सहकारी बैंकों और क्षेत्रीय ग्रामीण बैंकों द्वारा अनुरक्षित किया जाने वाला अपेक्षित औसत प्रारक्षित नकदी निधि अनुपात ( सीआरआर ) नीचे उल्लिखित तारीखों से प्रभावी , उनके सामने दर्शायेनुसार प्रतिशत पाईंट रहेगा ।

निवल मांग और मीयादी देयताओं पर प्रारक्षित नकदी निधि अनुपात ( प्रतिशत) प्रभावी तारीख (अर्थात् निम्न तारीख से आरंभ होने वाला पखवाड़ा)

4.75

18सितम्बर, 2004

5.00

2अक्तूबर, 2004

तथापि, अनुसूचित राज्य सहकारी बैंकों और क्षेत्रीय ग्रामीण बैंकों द्वारा उनके कुल मांग और मीयादी देयताओं का अनुरक्षित प्र'नावी प्रारक्षित नकदी निधि अनुपात अधिनियम के अंतर्गत निर्धारित पूर्वोक्त 3.00 प्रतिशत से कम नहीं होगा ।

[ग्राआऋवि . सं. 172/07-02-05/2004-05 ]

उषा थोरात, कार्यपालक निदेशक

(6673)

3050 Gl/04-1A 6674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 / KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

(Rural Planning and Credit Department)

New Delhi , the 11th September , 2004

S.O. 2628.- In exercise of the powers conferred by the Proviso to Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 42 of the Reserve Bank of India Act . 1934 (2 of 1934 ) and in supersession of its Notification RPCD No. 973 / 07-02-05/ 2002-03 dated April 29 , 2003 , the Reserve Bank of India hereby specifies that the average Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR ) required to be maintainedby Scheduled State Co- operative Banks and Regional Rural Banks shall , from effective dates mentioned below , be at the percentage points as indicated there against .

Effective date ( i.e. the fortnight beginning from)

CRR on net demand and time liabilities (per cent )

4.75

September 18, 2004

5.00

October 2, 2004

However , the effective CRR maintained by Scheduled State Co - operative Banks and Regional Rural Banks on total demand and time liabilities shall not be less than 3.00 per cent , as stipulated under the Act , ibid .

[ RPCD No. 172/07-02-05/2004-05 ] USHA THORAT, Executive Director

विदेश मंत्रालय

(सी. पी. वी. डिवीजन )

नई दिल्ली, 1 अक्तूबर , 2004

का.आ. 2629.- राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क ) अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के अंक ( क ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा भारत का प्रधान कौंसलावास , शंघाई में श्री नेलियाप्पन पोन्नापन, सहायक को श्री ए. एम. जे. चन्द्रन के स्थान पर 01-10-2004 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं .टी . 4330/01/2004 ]

उपेन्द्र सिंह रावत, अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर ) .

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAND

(C.P.V. Division)

New Delhi, the 1st Lctober , 2014

S.O. 2629.- in pursuance of clause ( a) of Section Ahe Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees ) Act , 1948 (41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , hereby agus ses Shri Nellaiappan Ponnappan , Assistant in the Consulate General of India, Shanghai to perform the duties of Assi Ani Consuler Officer vice Shri A.M.J. Chandran with effect froin 01-10-2004.

[No. Τ. 4330/01/2004]

U. S. RAWAT, Under Secy. ( Cons . )

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2630. - राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क ) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के अंक ( क ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास, अबीजों में श्री जिले सिंह नन्दल , सहायक को 04-10-2004 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी. 4330/01/2004 ]

उपेन्द्र सिंह रावत, अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर ) New Delhi , the 4th October , 2004

S.O. 2630. In pursuance of clause ( a ) of Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and Fees ) Act. 1948 (41 of 1948 ) , the Central Governinent , hereby authorises Shri Zile Singh Nandal , Assistant in the Embassy of India , Abidjan to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 04-10-2004.

[No. T. 4330/01/2004]

U.S. RAWAT, Under Secy . ( Cons. )

3050 G1/04-1B [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6671 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक1 , 1926

पोत परिवहन, सड़क परिवहन और राजमार्ग मंत्रालय

(पोत परिवहन विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 2631.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 ( यथा संशोधित 1987 ) के नियम के उप-नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में पोत परिवहन, सड़क परिवहन और राजमार्ग मंत्रालय , पोत परिवहन विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालय में 80 % से अधिक कर्मचारियों द्वारा हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लेने पर एतद्वारा उसे अधिसूचित करती है । सरकारी नाविक कार्यालय,

मेरिन हाऊस , हेस्टिंग्स, कोलकाता -700022

[फा. सं . ई -11011/1 /2000 - हिन्दी ] आर. के. जैन, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF SHIPPING , ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS

(Department of Shipping)

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2004

S.O. 2631. In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for the Official purpose of the Union) Rules , 1976 ( as amended 1987 ) , the Central Govemment hereby notifies the following office under the administrative control ofthe Ministry of Shipping . Road Transport and Highways , Department of Shipping, more than 80 % of the staff of which have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:---

Government Seamen's Office . Marine House, Hastings , Kolkata - 700022

[ F. No. E- 11011 / 1 /2000-Hindi ]

R.K. JAIN , Jt . Secy .

पर्यटन एवं संस्कृति मंत्रालय

(संस्कृतिविभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 11 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2632.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में संस्कृति मंत्रालय, के अधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालय जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है: -

1 केन्द्रीय संदर्भ पुस्तकालय, बेलवेडियर, कोलकाता

2 अधीक्षण पुरातत्त्व रसायनज्ञ , भारतीय पुरातत्त्व सर्वेक्षण , ( इन्दौर संभाग ) इन्दौर, म. प्र.

[सं. 1-2/2003 - हिन्दी ]

मोहिनी हिंगोरानी , निदेशक ( रा.भा. ) MINISTRY OF TOURISM AND CULTURE

(Department of Culture)

New Delhi , the 11th October , 2004

S.O. 2632. In pursuance of Sub - rule (4 ) of Rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for the Official purpose ofthe Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the Ministry of Culture more than 80% staff of which have acquired working knowledge ofHindi :---

1. Central Reference Library , Belvedere , Kolkata .

2. Superintending Archaeological Chemist ASI , ( Indore Division ), Indore , M.P.

[No.1-2/2003 -Hindi ]

MOHINI HINGORANI , Director (O.L) 6676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2633.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्रांजली सिस्टम्स, सर्वे सं. 6 , वंशीव बस्ती के पास, धनकवाडी, पुणे -411043 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " पी एस टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित (टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टाइटन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 28 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारंत अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शतप्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 किं. ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5× 10* के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 324)/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

6677 MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delni , the 5th October , 2004

S.O. 2633.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Modeldescribed in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to main- tain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " ST " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - 11 ) and with brand name " TITAN" (herein referred to as the said Model ) ...hufactured by M/s . Pranjali Systems , Survey No. 6, Near Vanshiv Vasti , Dhankawdi , Pune -411 043 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2004/28 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 15 Kg. and minimum capacity of 50g. The verification scale interval (e) is Ig. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weigh- ing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall aiso cover the weigh- ing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maxime capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50,00 for ' e ' value of 1mg. to 50mg . and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5× 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accor- dance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 324) / 2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTEOF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 / KARTIKA 1 , 1926

6678

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2634.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्रांजली सिस्टम्स, सर्वे सं. 6 , वंशीद बस्ती के पास, धनकवाडी, पुणे-411043 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 11 ) वाले " पी एस पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन संहित, स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टाइटन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/29 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 110 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 500 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शतप्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

> जाएगा। स्थम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 500 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 के या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 324 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6679

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग , II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 5th October , 2004

S.O. 2634.Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in confor- mity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Mudels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Plateform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " ST " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " TITAN " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Pranjali Systems , Survey No. 6, Near Vanshiv Vasti , Dhankawdi , Pune - 411 043 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/29:

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 110g . and minimatu capacity of 500g . The verification scale interval (e) is 10g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36, of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model siñal diso cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 500kg . with veri- fication scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2× 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved said model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 (324)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 6680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2635.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए टेट्रा पाक इंडिया प्रा. लि. , मेफेयर टावर्स, भू तल , वाक्डेवाडी, शिवाजी नगर, पुणे -411005 द्वारा विनिर्मित " टी डब्ल्यू ए-200 एस " श्रृंखला के भरण मशीन ( अनुमापी प्रकार की भरण और शील मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टेट्रा पाक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/73 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । TBA/ 19 for Tetra Wedge ™™ Aseptic

उक्त मॉडल एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( अनुमापी प्रकार की भरण और सील मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 मि . लीग या समतुल्य भार की है । इसकी अधिकतम भरण दर 60 पैकेट प्रति मिनट है । यह 440 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करती है । मशीन को मिनरल वाटर , दुग्ध, ब्रेवरेज जूस इत्यादि जैसे मुक्त बहाव' वाले अविसकस द्रव उत्पादों को भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिज़ाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन की स्वचालित भरण मशीन होंगी जो 1 मि.ली. से 200 मि.ली. तक की रेंज में अधिकतम क्षमता वाली हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 282 ) / 2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6681 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 6th October , 2004

S.O. 2635. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below ) is in confor- mity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic filling machine (Volumetric form fill and seal machine ) of " TWA- 200S " series with brand name " TETRA PAK " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M / s . Tetra Pak India Private Limited , Mayfair Towers , Ground Floor , Wakdewadi , Shivajinagar Pune - 411005 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/73 ;

TBA/19 for Tetra Wedge ™™ Aseptic

The said Model is an automatic filling machine ( Volumetric form fill and seal machine type ) . Its maximum capacity is 200 ml or equivalent weight . It has a maximum fill rate of 60 packs per minute . It operates on 440 V, 50 Hz alternative power supply . The machine is designed for filling free flowing non - viscous liquid products like mineral water , milk, beverage , juice etc.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 282)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 6682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 7 अक्तूबर , 2004

का.आ. 2636.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ग्रेस प्रॉडक्टस, प्लाट सं . ई -188 , जी आई डी सी इलेक्ट्रानिक एस्टेट गांधी नगर-382028 गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " ग्रेस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ग्रेस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/21 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शतप्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जाएगी । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला की वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10के के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 311 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6683 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2636.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in confor- mity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Table top type ) weigh- ing instrument with digital indication of " GRACE " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - 11 ) and with brand name "GRACE" (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M / s . Grace Products , Plot No. E- 188 , GIDC , Elec- tronics Estate , Gandhi Nagar ( Gujarat ) -382028 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2004 / 21 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 20 kg . and minimum capacity of 50 g . The verification scale interval (e ) is Ig . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weigh- ing result. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stainping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg. to 50 mg . or with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 311 )/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 6684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर , 2004

का.आ. 2637.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एनक्सो टेकनोलोजिज इंडिया लिमिटेड, प्लाट सं. 157 , नौरगपुरा , गुड़गांव द्वारा विनिर्मित अंकक सूचन सहितं, स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक भरण उपकरण " एम सी एस 9003 " श्रृंखला के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एनक्सो रोटो पैकर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2003/703 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक भरण उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. और उसमें कुल 12 टोंटी हैं । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शतप्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । जाएगी । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद की और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम को धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के भरण भी होंगे जो 50 कि. ग्रा. का 1 से 16 टोंटी तक की क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (202 )/2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6685 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2637. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in confor- mity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of of the model of Automatic Gravimet- ric filling Instrument with digital indication of " MCS 9003 " series and with brand name " ENEXCO ROTO PACKER " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Enexco Technologies India Limited, Plot No. 157 , Naurangapur, Gurgaon , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2003/703;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument with a maxi- mum capacity of 50kg . and consisting of 12 number of spouts . The smallest scale division is 10g . the light emitting diode( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hz alternative current power supply . It fills 60 bags per minute .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

ENEXCO

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 202 ) /2003 ]

F. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 6686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 / KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2638.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स साल्टर स्केल इण्डस्ट्रीज , आर-2360 , न्यू टेक्सटाइल मार्केट, सहार दरवाजा के सामने, रिंग रोड, सूरत, गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस एटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार का ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " साल्टर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/569 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विकृतिमापी लोड सैल आधारित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसकी न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) अंतराल 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है । विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा० या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10%, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 180 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6687 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2638. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SAT " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SALTER" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Salter Scale Industries , R- 2360 , New Textile Market , Opp . Sahar Darwaja , Ring Road , Surat , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /569 ;

The said model ( se the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 10 kg . and minimum capacity of 20 g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V , 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2g and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero marufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 180 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 6688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2639.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मौरपेन लेबोरेट्रिज लि. 409 चौथी मंजिल अंतरिक्ष भवन , 22 , के जी मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " पी एस -16 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मापमान प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ब्यूरर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2004/ 31 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सैल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 140 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. हैं । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया

* और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है । विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 150 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 % , के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 148 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6682 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2639. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument with digital indication (Person weighing scale ) of " PS - 16 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " BEURER" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M / s . Morepen Laboratories Ltd. , 409 , 4th Floor , Antriksh Bhawan , 22, K.G. Marg, New Delhi - 110 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/ 31 ;

The said model (see the figure given below) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 140 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V , 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 150kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 110k, 2 × 10k, 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 (148 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 3050 G1/04-2A 6690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23, 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर , 2004

का.आ. 2640.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मौरपेन लेबोरेट्रिज लि. , 409 चौथी मंजिल, अंतरिक्ष भवन , 22 , के जी मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110001 द्वारा विनिर्मित साधारण यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- IIII ) वाले " एम एस -01 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मापमान प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ब्यूरर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/2004/ 32 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

यह मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्प्रिंग आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) अंतराल 1 कि ग्रा. है । डायल पर पाइंटर द्वारा मापन के परिमाणों को निर्दिष्ट किया गया है ।

Y जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल. सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से 150 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 148 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान

3050 Gl/04-2B [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

6691

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2640.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument with analogue indication (Person weighing scale ) of " MS - 01 " series of ordinary accuracy (Accuracy class- IIII ) and with brand name " BEURER " ( herein after referred to as said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Morepen Laboratories Ltd. , 409, 4th Floor, Antriksh Bhawan , 22, K.G. Marg , New Delhi - 110 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/32;

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a spring based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120 kg . and minimum capacity of 10kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 1kg. The results of measurement are indicated by the pointer on dial .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 150kg and with number of verifications scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 1000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 148 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 6692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2641.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मौरपेन लेबोरेट्रिज लि. , 409 , चौथी मंजिल अंतरिक्ष भवन, 22 , के जी मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " बी एफ -60 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मापमान प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ब्यूरर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2004/33 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 140 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टैम्पिग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से 150 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक़ या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 148 ) /2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6693 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2641. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 27 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument with digital indication ( Pers . weighing scale ) of " BF - 60 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " BEURER " (hereinafter referred to as said model ), manufactedby M /s . Morepen Laboratories Ltd. , 409 , 4th Floor , Antriksh Bhawan , 22 , K.G. Marg , New Delhi - 110001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/33 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 140 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50- Hertz alternate current power supply ;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Caesion 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 150kg and with number of verifications scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 148 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 6694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2642.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मौरपेन लेबोरेट्रिज लि. , 409 चौथी मंजिल , अंतरिक्ष भवन , 22 , के ० जी० मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110001 द्वारा विनिर्मित साधारण यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- IV ) वाले " एम एस -50 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मापमान प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ब्यूरर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/34 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्प्रिंग आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 135 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 1 कि. ग्रा. है ।

f जाएगा । स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिएं सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपोलन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से 150 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 148)/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

6695

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October, 2004

S.O. 2642. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Ruies , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument with analogue indication ( Person weghing scale ) of " MS - 50 " series of ordinary accuracy (Accuracy class - IV ) and with brand name " BEURER " (hereinafter referred to as said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Morepen Laboratories Ltd. , 409 , 4th Floor , Antriksh Bhawan , 22 , K.G. Marg , New Delhi - 110 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2004/34;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a spring based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 135kg . and minimum capacity of 10kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1kg . The results of measurement are indicated by the pointer on dial .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 150kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 1000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 148 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director, Legal Metrology 6696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 / KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2643.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मौरपेन लेबोरेट्रिज लि. , 409 , चौथी मंजिल , अंतरिक्ष भवन, 22 , के० जी० मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " पी एस -22" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (व्यक्ति तोलन मापमान प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ब्यूरर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 35 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

f उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 140 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 100 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुदांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से 150 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 148 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6697 [भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2643. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument with digital indication (Person weighing scale ) of " PS - 22 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " BEURER " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Morepen Laboratories Ltd. , 409 , 4th Floor, Antriksh Bhawan , 22, K.G. Marg , New Delhi - 110 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/35 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 140kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Governrnent hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 150kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 x 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10%, k , being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (148 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director, Legal Metrology 6698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC . 3(ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2644.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मौरपेन लेबोरेट्रिज लि. , 409 , चौथी मंजिल , अंतरिक्ष भवन , 22, के. जी. मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " पी एस-14 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मापमान प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ब्यूरर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2004/36 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

{ उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 140 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से 150 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10* , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 148 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6699 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October, 2004

S.O. 2644. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument with digital indication ( Person weighing scale) of " PS - 14 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " BEURER " ( hereinafter referred to as said model ) , manufacturedby M /s. Morepen Laboratories Ltd. , 409 , 4th Floor , Antriksh Bhawan , 22, K.G. Marg, New Delhi - 110001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2004/36;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 140kg. and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 150kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 x 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10% , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 148 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 6700

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2645.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एनरफ बी.वी. रोटंगेनवेग 1,2624 , बी डी डैल्फ्ट, नोदलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित और वितरित नियंत्रण प्रणाली और भंडारण द्वारा प्रबंधन टेंक मानिटरिंग प्रणाली के सा मैसर्स टाटा हनीवेल लिमिटेड, 55 - ए8 / 9 हंडपसर इण्डिस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, पुणे -411013 द्वारा समेकित और विपणित , अंकक सूचन सहित हाइड्रोस्टेटिक टेंक गेज माप प्रणाली ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " हाइट्रास्टेटिक टेंक गेजिंग सिस्टम " है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/462 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

यह मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) कुसन्न स्तर, सघनता और गेज प्रणाली से दाब और परिमाण के साथ समेकित प्रणाली और समरूपति भंडारण टेंक में परिमाण द्रव के माप के लिए एक मापन प्रणाली है । प्रणाली का ओ आइ एम एल-आर-125 मार्ग निर्देश सिद्धांत के अनुसार परिक्षण किया है । द्रवस्थैजिक टेंक गेज वाली प्रणाली के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित हैं :-

-दाब संचारी : मॉडल 3001 सी 3 ए 22 एम आई ए 5 क्यू4 /रेसोमाउंट इंक

- क्षेत्र सूचक अंतरापृष्ट मॉडल एक्स ई एफ जेड 877 सी टी वाई /एनराफ

- स्पॉट आर टी डी ( तापमान परीक्षण ) : 3 वायर पीटी-100/ताप नियंत्रण

- जल अन्तरापृष्ट परीक्षण ( क्षमता प्रकार ) एमएसटी 9500/मिल्ट्रसनिक्स

- संचार अन्तरापृष्ट एकक मॉडल यू एन 858 पीएनसी/एनराफ

-डी सी एस: कुल योजना समाधान/हनी वेल

-एसडीएम/टीएमएम टाटा हनीवेल डीसीएस का साफ्टवेयर

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 25 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6701 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/ कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2645. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of Hydrostatic Tank Gauge measuring system and with digital display ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) with brand name " HYDRO STATIC TANK GAUGING SYSTEM " , manufactured by M/ s . Enraf B.V. Rontgenweg 1,2624 BD Delft, Netherlands and integrated and marketed by M/ s . Tata Honeywell Limited , 55 - A8/9 Hadpsar Industrial Estate, Pune - 411 013 with manufacturing of Distributed Control System and storage data management/tank monitoring system and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/462;

The model (see the figure given above ) is a measuring system for measurement of mass liquids in storage tanks configured and system integrated with mass and volume calculated from derived level , density and pressures from the gauging system . The systems has been tested as per OIML - R - 125 guidelines . The Hydro static tank gauging system comprises of the following:

-Pressure Transmitters : Model 3001C3A22MIA5Q4 /Rsoemount Inc

-Field Display Interface : Model XEFZ877CTY /Enraf

-Spot RTD (Temperature Probe ) : 3 wire PT- 100/Tempcontrols

--Water Interface Probe (capacities type ) MST9500/ Milltronics

-Communication interface unit : Model UN 858PNC/ Enraf

-DCS: total Plan solutions/ Honeywell

-SDM/ TMM Software of Tata Honeyewell DCS

[F: No: WM-21 ( 25)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 6702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर , 2004

का.आ. 2646.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एम जी लैगोक , सिस्टम्स, 11/33, चौपासनी हाउसिंग बोर्ड, जोधपुर -342008 ( राजस्थान ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एम जी एल टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम जी लैगोक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/61 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) का उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 22 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जाएगी । और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में , सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100मि. ग्रा. से या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 185)/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6703 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi, the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2646. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MGLT " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "MG LAGOC" (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . M.G. Lagoc Systems , 11/33 , Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur-342 008 (Rajasthan ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/ 61 ;

The said.Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 22 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM-21 ( 185) /2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 6704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926 .

[ PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2647.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एम जी लैगोक, सिस्टम्स , 11/33 , चौपासनी हाउसिंग बोर्ड, जोधपुर -342008 ( राजस्थान ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एम जी एल पी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम जी लैगोक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 62 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) का उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1100 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जाएगी । और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से ऊपर और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 185 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6705 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 19:26

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2647.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate savice under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MGLP" series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " MG LAGOC " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . M.G. Lagoc Systems , 11/ 33 , Chopasni Housing Board , Jodhpur- 342 008 ( Rajasthan ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2004/62;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1100 Kg . and minimum capacity of 5kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[ F. No. WM-21 ( 185 )/2002 ] Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50000 for ' e' value of 100mg and more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k , 2× 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3050 G1/04-3A 6706

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23, 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्टूबर, 2004

का०आ ० 2648.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 की 60 ) तथा बाट और मापं मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगी;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टू वे डिजीटल टेक्नोलोजीज, दुकान सं ० 3 , प्रथम तल, मोहन पैलेस , जंदी रोड, सोनीपत ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " टी डब्ल्यू टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप ) के मॉडलं की, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टू" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/9 सममुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

1 उक्तमाडल एक विकृतिमापी प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 12 कि० ग्रा० और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा ० है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) की भाम 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलम परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जाएगी । और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि० ग्रा० से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक" ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि० ग्रा ० या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए, 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि०ग्रा ० तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा०सं ० डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 213 ) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान

3050 G1/04-38 6707 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2648. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " TWT " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " TRUE " (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s . True Weigh Digital Technologies , Shop No. 3 , 1st Floor, Mohan Place , Jandi Road , Sonepat (Haryana) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2004/09 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrüment ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 12 Kg. and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval ( e) is Ig . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of I × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10% , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 213 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology [ PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 6708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का०आ० 2649.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 को 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टू वे डिजीटल टेक्नोलोजीज, दुकान सं० 3 , प्रथम तल, मोहन पैलेस , जंदी रोड, सोनीपत ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-3) वाले " टी डब्ल्यूपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डू" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 10 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमाडल एक विकृतिमापी प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलम उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि ० ग्रा० और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि०ग्रा० है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा० है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जाएगी । और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा० या उससे अधिक के " ई" भान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि० ग्रा० से 1000 कि० ग्रा० तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा०सं० डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 213 )/2003 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6709 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2649,-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " TWP " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "TRUE" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M /s . True Weigh Digital Technologies , Shop No. 3 1st Floor, Mohan Place , Jandi Road , Sonepat ( Haryana ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 / 2004 /10 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 500 Kg . and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 30kg and up to 1000 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k , being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 (213 ) /2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 6710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2650.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एफ एस टी इलैक्ट्रानिक्स, प्रथम तल, प्लाट सं ० 64, इण्डस्ट्रीयल फोकल प्वाइण्ट, फेस -१, मोहाली, जिला रोपड़, पंजाब द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्य यथार्थता सार्थता वर्ग -111 ) वाले " सी टी 202 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एवर राइट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/2004/39 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

में उक्तमॉडल विकृतिमापी प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित यथार्थता वर्ग टेबलटाप प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है । इसकी न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) अंतराल 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.--21 ( 317 ) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6711 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th October, 2004

S.O. 2650.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CT202" series of high accuracy ( accuracy ciass - iil ) and with brand name " Ever right" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . F.S.T. Electronics , ist Floor , Plot No. 64, Industrial Focal Point , Phase - IX, Mohali , Distt . Ropar, Punjab and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/139;

The sald Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing estrument ( Table Top type) with a maximum capacity of 20 Kg . and minimum capacity of 40g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2g . It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shali also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g. or with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ( e) value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equai to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 (317)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 6712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर , 2004

का.आ. 2651.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एफ एस टी इलैक्ट्रानिक्स , प्रथम तल, प्लाट सं० 64, इण्डस्ट्रीयल फोकल प्वाइण्ट, फेस-9, मो, जिला रोपड़, पंजाब द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " सीपी 100 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एवर राइट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09/2004/40 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल विकृतिमापी प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित यथार्थता वर्ग टेबलटाप प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । इसकी न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा.। सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) अंतराल 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल केअनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 300 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10%, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 (317 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6713 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

S.O. 2651. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CP100 " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Ever right " ( herein referred to as the said Model ), manufacturedby M /s . F.S.T. Electronics , 1st Floor, Plot No. 64 , Industrial Focal Point , Phase - IX , Mohali , Distt . Ropar , Punjab and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/40:

Ever-

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 100 Kg . and minimum capacity of 200g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 10g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and upto 300 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2× 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (317)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 6714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली , 8 अक्तूबर , 2004

का० आ० 2652.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम सं०

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

1. आई एस 7329 : 1974

संशोधन की संख्या 3. अगस्त2004

31 अगस्त 2004 2. आई एस 10720 : 1992

संशोधन की संख्या 2. अगस्त 2004

31 अगस्त 2004 3. आई एस 13239 : 1991

संशोधन की संख्या 2. अगस्त 2004

संशोधन की संख्या 2. अगस्त2004

31 अगस्त 2004 इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सी एच डी/जी एन ]

एस० दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उप महानिदेशक( तकनीकी-1 ) 6715 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2652.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of Sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Amendment No. 2, AUG 2004

15. IS 4251 : 1967

Copy to these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: CHD/GN ]

S. DAS GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' Dy . Director General (Tech - 1 ) 6716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC, 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

का० आ० 2653.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

सं० और वर्ष

3 1. आई एस 384: 2002

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

संशोधन की संख्या 1 , अगस्त 2004

2. आई एस 3976: 2003

15 अक्तूबर, 2004

संशोधन की संख्या । , अगस्त2004

3. आई एस 1848 : 1991

15 अक्तूबर, 2004

30 सितम्बर , 2004

12. आई एस 1103 : 1984

30 सितम्बर, 2004

संशोधन की संख्या 2 , सितम्बर 2004

13. आई एस 1104 : 1984

संशोधन की संख्या 1 , सितम्बर 2004

14. आई एस 2622 : 1986

30 सितम्बर, 2004

संशोधन की संख्या 2 , सितम्बर 2004

21. आई एस 12920 : 1990

संशोधन की संख्या 1 , सितम्बर 2004

30 सितम्बर , 2004 इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सी एच डी/जी एन ] एस० दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 ) 6717

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2653.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of Sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Sl . No. and year of the Indian No. Standards

3 2

Amendment No. 1 , SEP 2004

21. आई एस 12920 : 1990

Copy of these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwabati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: CHD/GN] S. DAS GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' Dy . Director General (Tech- 1 ) 6718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23, 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( il) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

का० आ० 2654.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/ किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम सं०

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

7231: 1994

2, जुलाई 2004

10सितम्बर, 2004 इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ : सी ई डी/गजट ]

एस० दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक(तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2654. In pursuance of clause (b) of Sub - rule (1 ) of Rule 7 of Bureau of Indian Standards kules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. and year of the indian No. and year of the amendment

No. Standards

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

7231 : 1994

2, July2004

10 September , 2004 Copy of this standard is available for sale with the Bureau of indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata. Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: CED/Gazette]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director Generai (Tech - 1 ) 6719 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर , 2004

का० आ० 2655.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की

क्रम

संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

सं.

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

अगस्त, 2004 1. आई एस 15518 ( भाग-1 ) : 2004 तापदीप्ति लैम्पों के लिए सुरक्षा अपेक्षाएं : भाग 1 घरेलू और ऐसे ही सामान्य प्रकाश प्रयोजनों के लिए टंगस्टन फिलामेंट लैम्प

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: ई टी डी/जी-136 ] एस० दास गुप्ता , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2655.-In pursuance of clause ( b ) of Sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule (7 ) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each : -

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl. No. & Year of the

No. & Year of Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

No. Indian Standards Established

1 .

August 2004 1. IS 15518 (Part - 1 ) : 2004 Safety Requirements for Incandescent Lamps Part- 1 Tungsten Filament Lamps for Domestic and similar General Lighting purposes

Copy to this standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata . Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: ETD/G- 136]

S. DAS GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' Dy . Director General (Tech - I ) 6720

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 / KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART 1H- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

का० आ० 2656.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की

स्थापित तिथि क्रम सं. संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि काई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

31-08-2004 1. आई . एस. 15454 : 2004 " खुले प्रणालों में द्रव प्रवाह मापन- उर्ध्वाधरों की सीमित संख्या में प्रयुक्त करते हुए वेग- क्षेत्र पद्धति"

आई . एस. 11105 : 1984

31-08-2004 2. आई. एस. 11105 : 2004 " सुरंग प्लगों के डिजाइन तथा निर्माण पहलू की रीति संहिता (पहला पुनरीक्षण )"

आई. एस. 11855: 1986

31-08-2004 3. आई . एस. 11855 : 2004 " द्रवचालित गेट के लिए विभिन्न प्रकार की रबड की सीलों के डिजाइन एवं उपयोग के दिशानिर्देश (पहला पुनरीक्षण) "

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : डब्ल्यू आर डी/जी -117 ]

एस० दास गुप्ता , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2656.-In pursuance of clause ( b ) of Sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :-

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. & Year of the

Date of Established No. Indian Standards Established

No. & Year of Indian Standards . if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard

1 . 2

1. IS 15454 : 2004

31-08-2004 " Liquid flow measurement in open channels - Velocity - area method using a restricted number of verticals "

2. IS 11105 : 2004

31-08-2004

IS 11105 : 1984

"Design and construction of tunnel plugs Code of practice (First revision ) " 6721 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

1. 2

31-08-2004

IS 11855 : 1986

3. IS: 11855: 2004 "Guidelines for design and use of different types of rubber seals for hydraulic gates (Firstrevision) "

Copy to this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata. Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[ Ref: WRD/G- 117 ]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy . Director General (Tech - I )

नई दिल्ली , 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

का० आ० 2657 भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम सं.

1 2

149-2004

संशोधन सं . 1 /अगस्त, 2004

1. 9282: 2002 निलम्बन वाले पुलों के लिए तार और लडे विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ एम ई डी/जी-2: 1 ]

एस० दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2657.- In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :-

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

No. and year of the Indian Standards

Sl . No.

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

1. 2

14-09-2004 1.

Amendment No. 1 /Aug. , 2004

9282 : 2002 Wire ropes and Strands for Suspension Bridges- Specification (Firstrevision)

Copy of this Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata . Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MED/G- 2 : 1 ]

S. DAS GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General (Tech - I ) 3050 G1/04-4A 6722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

का० आ ० 2658.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गए हैं:

अनुसूची

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक की

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

सं. संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

1. आई एस 628 : 1993

31अगस्त, 2004

संशोधन संख्या 1 अगस्त, 2004

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: टी ई डी/जी-17 : 2 ]

एस० दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2658.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau ofIndian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Sl . No. and year of the

No. Indian Standards

Date from which the amendment shall have effect 1 2

1. 628 : 1993

31 August, 2004

Amendment No. 1 August , 2004

Copy to these Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata . Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: TED/G - 17 : 2]

S. DAS GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' Dy . Director General (Tech - I)

3050 G1/04-4B 6723 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक1 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2659.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद् द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम

संख्या

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रजित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

30अगस्त, 2004

आई एस 3387:1973

1. आई एस 3387 : 200 टुथब्रश-विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरोक्षण )

30अगस्त, 2004

आई एस 2307: 1977

2. आई एस 2307 : 2004 विस्फोटक और आतिशबाजी संधरन के लिए मैग्नीशियम पाउडर की विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

संदर्भ: सी एच डी/जी एन ]

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October, 2004

S.O. 2659.In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each .

SCHEDULE

SI . No. and year of the Indian

Date of Established No. Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Standards

31 August , 2004

IS 3387 : 1973

1 . IS 3387 : 2004 Tooth Brush- Specification (Second Revision )

31 August, 2004

IS2307 : 1977

2. IS 2307: 2004 Magnesium Powder for Explosive and Pyrotechnic composition- specification ( Second Revision)

Copyto these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: CHD/GN]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy . Director General (Tech - I ) 6724

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2660.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद् द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :

अनुसूची

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक(कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

स्थापित तिथि संख्या

5890 : 1970

30 सितम्बर , 2004 1. 5890: 2004 चल हाट मिक्स एस्फाल्ट प्लॉट हल्का उपयोग-अपेक्षाएँ ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

30सितम्बर, 2004 2. 15475 ( भाग 1 ) : 2004 मनोरंजन के लिए सुरक्षित सवारी की रीति संहिता भाग 1 सामान्य सूचना

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एम ई डी/जी-2: 1 ]

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2660. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the Indian

Sl . No. Standards Established

Date of Established

No. and Year of Indian standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Standards

1 .

5890 : 1970

30 September , 2004 5890: 2004 ( First Revision ) Mobile hot mix Asphalt plant, Light duty- Requirements

30 September, 2004 2. 15475 (Part 1 ) : 2004 Code of recommended practice for amusement rides safety Part 1 General information

Copy to these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg . New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[ Ref: MED/G- 2: 1 ]

S. DAS GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General (Tech - 1) 6725 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2661.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

4 1

31 अगस्त 2004

4925 : 1968

1. 4925: 2004 कंक्रीट बैचिंग और मिश्रण संयंत्र विशिष्टि( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

31 अगस्त 2004

5500 (भाग 1 ) : 1977 ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

2. 5500 ( भाग 1 ) : 2004 कंपन रोलर सामान्य अपेक्षाएँ भाग 1 : स्वत नोदनित एकल ड्रम (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

31 अगस्त 2004

5500 ( भाग 2 ) : 1992 ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

3. 5500 ( भाग 2) : 2004 कंपन रोलर सामान्य अपेक्षाएँ भाग 2 : स्वत नोदनित अग्रपश्च ड्रम (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

31 अगस्त 2004

8198 ( भाग 1 से भाग 4) : 1984

4. 8198: 2004 संपीडित गैस के लिए इस्पात के सिलिंडर वायुमंडली गैस , हाईड्रोजन , उच्च दाब ( द्रवहीय गैस और घुलनशील एसिटलीन गैस ) रीति संहिता

31 अगस्त 2004 5. 15449 ( भाग 1 ) : 2004 घरेलू प्रयाजनों के लिए जिग- जैग सिलाई मशीन हैड भाग 1 : सामान्य अपेक्षाएँ

31 अगस्त 2004 6. 15449 ( भाग 2 ) : 2004 घरेलू प्रयोजनों के लिए जिग- जैग सिलाई मशीन हैड भाग 2 परिशुद्धता अपेक्षाएँ

31 अगस्त 2004 7. 15449 ( भाग 3 ) : 2004 घरेलू प्रयोजनों के लिए जिग- जैग सिलाई मशीन हैड भाग 3 सिलाई की अपेक्षाएँ

31 अगस्त 2004 8. 15449 ( भाग 4): 2004 घरेलू प्रयोजनों के लिए जिग- जैग सिलाई मशीन हैड भाग 4 टिकाऊपन की अपेक्षाएँ

31 अगस्त 2004 9. 15475 ( भाग 4) : 2004 मनोरंजन के लिए सुरक्षित सवारी कीरीति संहिता भाग 4 चयन प्रशिक्षण और प्रचालकों का पर्यवेक्षण

31 अगस्त 2004 10. 15485: 2004 फोटोग्राफी फ्लैशअनावरण मीटर-अपेक्षाएँ

31 अगस्त 2004 11. 15486 : 2004 फोटोग्राफी कैमरे के लैंस - आई एस ओ स्पैक्ट्रमी संचरण का मापन

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तपुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एम ई डी/जी-2 : 1 ]

एस . दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 ) 6726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIK 1, 193

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 8th October, 2004

S.O. 2661. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each .

SCHEDULE

Date of Establishment SI. No.

No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and Year of Indian standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Standards

4 1

31-08-2004

4925: 1968

1. 4925: 2004 (First Revision) Concrete batching and mixing plant- Specification

31-08-2004

5500 (Part 1 ) : 1977

(FirstRevision)

5500 ( Part 1 ) : 2004 ( Second Revision) Vibratory roller-General requirements Part 1 Self-propelled tandem drum

31-08-2004 3.

5500 (Part 2) : 1992

(Second Revision)

5500 (Part 2 ): 2004 ( Third Revision ) Vibratory roller-General requirements Part 2 Self- propelled single drum

31-08-2004 4. 8198: 2004

8198 ( Part 1 to Part 4) : 1984

Steel cylinders for compressed gases (Atmospheric gases , Hydrogen, High pressure liquefiable gases and dissolved acetylene gases )--Code of practice

31-08-2004 15449 (Part 1 ) : 2004

Household Zig - zag Sewing machine head : part 1 General requirements

31-08-2004 6. 15449 (Part 2): 2004

Household Zig - zag Sewing machine head : part 2 Accuracy requirements

31-0 7. 15449 ( Part 3 ) : 2004

Household Zig - zag Sewing machine head: part 3 sewing requirements

31-08-2004 8. 15449 (Part 4) : 2004

Household Zig - zag Sewing machine head: part 4 Durability requirements

31-08-2004 9. 15475 (Part 4): 2004

Code of recommended practice for amusement ridessafety Part 4 Selection , Training and supervision of operators

31-08-2004 15485 : 2004

10.

Photography --Flash exposure meter - Requirements

31-08-2004 15486: 2004

11.

Photography- Camera lenses - Measurement ofISO spectral transmittance

Copy of these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and ala Sranch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpu Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthpuram.

ref: MED/G-2 : 1 ]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist . Dy . Director General (Tech - 1 ) 6727 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2662.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

31-8-2004 1. आई एस 15510: 2004 भारी कार्य के लिए क्रैकिंत प्रेषण चेनें

31-8-2004 2. आई एस 15511 : 2004 साइकिल जंजीरें- अभिलक्षण और परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ

31-8-2004 3. आई एस 6623 2004 उच्च सामर्थ्य वाली सरंचना ढिबरियाँ-विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एमजीपी 30/टी 35 व 30 , एमजीपी 33/टी-92 ]

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October, 2004

S.O. 2662. In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - rule (1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each.

SCHEDULE

Date of Establishment No. years and Title of the Indian Standards Established

Sl. No.

No. & Year of Indian standards , ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standards

31-08-2004 1. IS 15510 : 2004 Heavy duty cranked- link transmission chains

31-08-2004 2. IS 15511 : 2004 Cycle chains- Characteristics and test methods

31-08-2004 3. IS 6623 : 2004 High strength structural nuts- Specification (Second revision)

Copy ofthese standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards. Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg. New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MGP 30/T- 35 & 30/MGP33/T- 92

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General (Tech 6728

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIE

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ,

नई दिल्ली , 8 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2663.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द‌द्वारा. अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :--

अनुसूची

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संख्या

संशोधन लागू होने कीशिथि

1. आई एस 628: 1993 साइकिल पेडल समुच्चय -

संशोधन संख्या 1 अगस्त 2004 31अगस्त 2004 विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : टी ई डी/जी 17 : 2 ]

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी- Ⅰ ) New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2663. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standa Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulrwhen are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :-

SCHEDULE

SI . No. year and Title of the Indian

No. & Year ofthe

Date from which No. Standards

amendment

the amendment shall have effect 2

Amendment No. 1 August 2004

31 August 2004 IS 628 : 1993 Bicycles Pedal Assembly - Specification (Second Revision)

Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: TED/G 17 : 2]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General (Tech - 1 ) 6729 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2664.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक संख्या

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदिकोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

नया

31जुलाई 2004 1. आई एस 15487 : 2004/आई एस ओ 15871 : 2000 औद्योगिक ट्रक्स- आघानों का प्रहस्तन और ग्रैपलर आर्म कार्यों की सूचक लाइट की विशिष्टि

नया

31जुलाई 2004 2. आई एस 15488: 2004/आई एस ओ 15870: 2000 पावर औद्योगिक ट्रक्स- सुरक्षा संकेत और संकट सूचक चित्रांकन- सामान्यसिद्धांत

31 अगस्त 2004

आई एस 9435: 1980

3. आई एस 9435 : 2004 दुपहिया एवं तिपहिया वाहनों को छोड़- कर सड़क वाहनों के आयाम से संबंधित शब्दावली एवं परिभाषाएं (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

आई एस 12511 ( भाग 2) 1989 31 अगस्त 2004 4. आई एस 125 % भाग 2 ) : 2004 कमानियां चकती कमानी भाग 2 विशिष्ट इला पुनरीक्षण )

नया

31 अगस्त 2004 5. आई एस 15 टायरों 004 विमान के लिए रेडियल/क्रास प्लाई विशिष्टि

31 अगस्त 2004

नया

6. आई एस 15453 : 2004 स्प्रिंग मरोड सरिया स्प्रिंग विशिष्टि

आई एस 12511 ( भाग 1 ) : 1989 30 सितम्बर 2004 7. आई एस 12511 ( भाग 1 ) : 2004 कमानियां-चकती कमानी भाग 1 डिजाइन परिकलन ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

30सितम्बर 2004

आई एस 9574: 1989

8. आई एस 9574: 2004 पट्टा कमानी समुच्चय क्लिप्स - विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: टी ई डी/जी-17: 2 ]

एस. दास गुप्ता , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 ) 6730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2664. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :-

SCHEDULE

No.

Sl . No. Year and Title of the Indian Standards Established

(1)

1 . IS 15487 : 2004/ ISO 15871 : 2000 Industrial Trucks - Specification for indicator lights for container handling and grappler arm operations

2. IS 15488 : 2004/ ISO 15870 :2000 Powered Industrial Trucks - Safety signs & hazard pictorials - General principles

3. IS 9435 : 2004 Terms and Definitions relating to dimensions of road vehicles other than 2 and 3 wheelers (First revision)

4. IS 12511 ( Part 2 ) : 2004 Springs - Disc spring Part 2 Specification ( First revision)

5. is 15428 : 2004 Retreading of radial/ cross ply tyres for aircraft - Specification

6. IS 15453 : 2004 Spring - Torsion bar springs - Specification

7. IS 12511 ( Part 1 ) : 2004 Springs - Disc spring Part 1 Design calculation ( First revision)

8. IS 9574 : 2004 Leaf springs assembly clips - Specification (Second revision)

Date of

Established No. & Year of Indian Standards , ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(3)

(4)

New

31 July2004 New

31 July2004 IS9435: 1980

31 August 2004 IS 12511 (Part 2) : 1989

31 August 2004 New

31 August 2004 IS 12511 ( Part 1 ) : 1989

30 September 2004 IS9574 : 1989

30 September 2004 Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram

[Ref: TED/G - 17 : 2 ]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General ( Tech - 1 ) 6731

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2665.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

संख्या

31जुलाई 2004 1. आई एस 15470 : 2004/आई. एस. ओ .6645 : 1981 गेहूँ का आटा - शुष्क लासा का निर्धारण

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एफ ए डी/जी/ 128 ]

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2665.-In pu: nce of clause ( b ) of Sub rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule (7 ) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the 1987 the Bureau of Indi

ave been established on the date indicated against each.

Schedule hereto annex

SCHEDULE

Dateof Sl . No. anu year of the Indian

Established No. Standards Established

No. and Year of Indian standards , ifany, superseded by the New Indian Standards

31 July, 2004 1. IS 15470 : 2004/ ISO 6645 : 1981

WHEAT FLOUR DETERMINATION OF DRY GLUTEN

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: FAD/G/128 ]

S. DAS GUPTA . Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General ( Tech - 1) 6732

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2666.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

स्थापित तिथि संख्या

अगस्त 2004 1. आई एस 13805 2004 अविनाशी परीक्षण में लगे कार्मिकों का प्रमाणन और योग्यताओं के लिए सामान्य प्रतिमान ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

आई एस 13805: 1993 अविनाशी परीक्षण में लगे कार्मिकों का प्रमाणन और योग्यताओं के लिए सामान्य प्रतिमान

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ : एम.टी.डी. 21 /टी-44]

एस. दास गुप्ता , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 ) New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2666.-- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule ( 7 ) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each .

SCHEDULE

Date of

SI . No. and years of the Indian No. Standards Established

Established

No. and Year of Indian standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Standards

August 2004

IS 13805 : 1993 General Standard for Qualification and Certification of Non- Destructive Testing Personnel

1. IS 13805 : 2004 General Standard for Qualification and Certification ofNon- Destructive Testing Personnel Specification ( FirstRevision )

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore . Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[ Ref: MTD 21 /T-44 ]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy . Director General ( Tech- 1 ) 6733 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक1 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2667.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

सितम्बर 2004 1. आई एस 8780 2004 इस्पात ढलाइयों के अविनाशी परीक्षण हेतु - रीति संहिता ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

आई एस 8780 : 1978 - इस्पात ढलाइयों के अविनाशी परीक्षण हेतु- रीतिसंहिता

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9, बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एम.टी.डी. 21/टी-35 ]

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

S.O. 2667. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1) of Rule ( 7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each .

SCHEDULE

Dateof Established Sl. No.

No. and years of the Indian Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards , ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standards

September 2004 1. IS 8780 : 2004 Non -Destructive Testing of Steel Castings- Codeof Practice ( First Revision)

IS 8780 : 1978 Code of Practice Non- Destructive Testing of Steel Castings

Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[ Ref: MTD 21/T-35 ]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy . Director General (Tech - I) 6734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIΚΑ 1. 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] कोयला और खान मंत्रालय

(कोयलाविभाग)

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 13 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2668. - केन्द्रीय धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय ( कोयला विभाग ) की अधिसूचना संख्यां का.आ. 34,3, तारीख 05 फरवरी , 2004 जो भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 14 फरवरी , 2004 को प्रकाशित की गई थी, प्रकाशित होने पर, उक्त अधिसूचना से अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि उपाबद्ध उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त आत्यंतिक रूप से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित हो गई थी ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का , समाधान हो गया है, कि सैन्ट्रल कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , रांची ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त और सरकारी कंपनी कहा गया है ) ऐसे निबंधनों और शर्तों का, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार इस निमित अधिरोपित करना उचित समझे , अनुपालन करने के लिए है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्तं अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि इस प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि और उस पर के अधिकार, केन्द्रीय सरकार में इस प्रकार निहित बने रहने की बजाय , तारीख 14 फरवरी , 2004 से निम्नलिखित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधिन रहते हुए , उक्त सरकारी कंपनी में निहित हो जाएगें अर्थात्-

1. सरकारी कंपनी , उक्त अधिनियम के उपबंधों के अधीन अवधारित प्रतिकर, ब्याज , और नुकसानियों इत्यादि की बाबत किये गये सभी संदायों की केन्द्रीय सरकार को प्रतिपूर्ति करेगी ;

2. सरकारी कंपनी द्वारा शर्त 1 के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को संदेय रकमों का अबधारण करने के प्रयोजन के लिये एक अधिकरण का गठन किया जाएगा तथा अधिकरण की सहायता के लिये नियुक्त सभी व्यक्तियों के संबध में उपगत सभी व्यय, सरकारी कंपनी वहन करेगी और इसी प्रकार निहित भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के लिए या उनके संबंध में सभी विधिक कार्यवाहियों जैसे अपील आदि की बाबत उपगत सभी व्यय भी , सरकारी कंपनी वहन करेगी ;

6735 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3. सरकारी कंपनी , केन्द्रीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों की, ऐसे किसी अन्य व्यय के संबंध में, जो इस प्रकार निहित भूमि में या उस पर के अधकारों के बारे में, केन्द्रीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों द्वारा या उस पर के अधिकारों के बारे में, आवश्यक हो, क्षतिपूर्ति करेगी ;

4. सरकारी कंपनी को, केन्द्रीय सरकार के पूर्व अनुमोदन के बिना, उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को अंतरित करने की शक्ति नही होगी ;

5. सरकारी कंपनी , ऐसे निदेशों और शर्तों का, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा , जब कभी आवयक हो , विशिष्ट क्षेत्रों के लिए दिए जाएं या अधिरोपित की जाएं , पालन करेगी ।

[फा. सं . - 43015/22/2000-पी. आर. आई. डब्ल्यू. ] गार्गी मुखर्जी, निदेशक

Ministry of Coal and Mines

(Department of Coal)

ORDER

New Delhi , the 13th October, 2004

S: O. 2668. Whereas on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal ( Department of Coal ) number S.O.343 dated the 5th February , 2004 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) , and published in the Gazette of India dated 14th February . 2004 the land described in the said schedule appended to the said notification vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under sub - section ( 1 ) if section 10 of the said act ;

And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the Central Coalfields Limited . Ranchi ( hereinafter referred to as the "Government Company " is willing to comply with such terms and conditions as the Central Government thinks fit to impose in this behalf:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 11 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby directs that the lands and rights vested shall with effect from the 14th February , 2004 instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government , shall vest in the said Government Company , subject to the following terms and conditions , namely : - ( 1 ) . The Government Company shall reimburse of Central Government all payments made in respecto compensation , interest and damages etc , as determined under the provisions of the saidAct.

(2) . A tribunal shall be constituted for the purpose of determining the amounts payable to the Central Government by the Government Company under condition ( 1 ) and all persons 6736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1. 1926

PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] appointed to assist the tribunal shall be borne by the Government Company , and , similarly , all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings like appeals etc. for or in connection with the rights , in or over the lands , so vesting shall also be borne by the Government Company .

(3). The Government Company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other expenditures that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or its officials regarding the rights or in over the lands so vesting.

(4). The Government Company shall have no powers to transfer the lands specified in the schedule to the said notification to any other person without the previous approval of the Central Government .

(5). The Government Company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or imposed by the Central Government for particular areas , as and necessary.

[No. 43015/22/2000- P.R.I.W. ] GARGI MUKHERJEE , Director

नई दिल्ली, 14 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2669.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ।

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 , ( 1957 का 20) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस क्षेत्र में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं ० एसईसीएल / बीएसपी/ जीम/ ( पीएलजी) / भूमि/ 286 तारीख , 17 मार्च , 2004 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर, शहडोल (मध्यप्रदेश ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कलकत्ता 700001 या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर - 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में, हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चार्टो और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर भारसाधक अधिकारी/ विभागाध्यक्ष ( राजस्व) , साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर - 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ ) को भेजेंगे । [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6717

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

अनुसूची

दुलहरा ब्लाक , सोहागपुर क्षेत्र जिला - शहडोल ( मध्यप्रदेश)

( रेखांक संख्या एसईसीएल/ बीएसपी/ जीएम/ पीएलजी/ भूमि/ 286 तारीख 17 मार्च, 2004) ( पूर्वेक्षणं के लिए अधिसूचित भूमि दर्शाते हुए ) ग्राम का नाम

तहसील क्रम संख्या

पटवारी हल्का नं०

सेमरिया

सोहागपुर 2

हर्रा

सोहागपुर 3

चटहा

सोहागपुर 4

भानपुर

सोहागपुर 5

दगदहा

सोहागपुर 6

करूई

सोहागपुर 7

मिठौरी

सोहागपुर 8

दुलहरा

सोहागपुर 9

छीरपानी

सोहागपुर 10

सिगुडी

सोहागपुर 11 करूअँताल

सोहागपुर 12 निपनिया

सोहागपुर 13

बकतावल

सोहागपुर जिला

टिप्पणी

(हेक्टर

क्षेत्रफल लगभग)

शहडोल 381.840

संपूर्ण 266.542

शहडोल

संपूर्ण शहडोल

160.230

संपूर्ण 515.973

शहडोल

संपूर्ण 80.890

शहडोल

संपूर्ण 223.883

शहडोल

संपूर्ण 723.670

शहडोल

संपूर्ण 174.932

शहडोल

संपूर्ण 206.631

शहडोल

संपूर्ण 200.448

भाग

शहडोल

155.882

शहडोल

संपूर्ण 212.881

शहडोल

संपूर्ण 74.376

शहडोल

संपूर्ण कुल योगः- 3378.178 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 8347.48 एकड़ (लगभग)

सीमा विवरणः

क-ख

रेखा ग्राम मिठौरी की सीमा पर बिन्दु "क " से आरंभ्म होती है और ग्राम मिठौरी , दगदहा , करूई की उत्तरी सीमा के साथ- साथ गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ख" पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग

रेखा ग्राम करूई , दुलहरा , करूआताल की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ- साथ गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है । ग-घ

रेखा ग्राम निपिनया, बकतावल, सिगुडी, की दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ- साथ और फिर ग्राम सिंगुडी से होते हुए गुजरती है और बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है ।

घ -क

रेखा ग्राम सिंगुड़ी, छीरपानी , चटहा , हर्रा, सेमरिया , मिठौरी , की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ- साथ गुजरती है और आरम्भिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

3050 G1/04-5A

[फा. सं. -43015/16/2004- पी.आर.आई. डब्ल्यू. ]

गार्गी मुखर्जी, निदेशक 6738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23, 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 14th October, 2004

S.O. 2669.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisitions and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein.

The Plan bearing Number : SECL/ BSP / GM ( PLG ) /LAND /286 dated the 17th March , 2004 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the Office of the Collector , Shahdol (Madhya Pradesh ) or in the Office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Calcutta - 700 001 or in the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Section ) , Seepat Road . Bilaspur - 495006 ( Chhattisgarh ).

All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred in sub - section ( 7) of section 13 of the said Act to the Officer- inCharge /Head of the Department ( Revenue ) . South Eastern Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Section ) . Seepat Road . Bilaspur - 495006 ( Chhattisgarh ), within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the official gazette .

Schedule

Dulahra Block , Sohagpur Area District - Shahdol ( Madhya Pradesh)

( Plan No.SECL / BSP / GM ( Plg ) / Land 286 dated 17th March 2004 , ( showing the land notified for prospecting)

Tahsil Name of village

Serial number

Patwari halka number

1 .

Semrlya

Sohapur 2.

Harra

Sohapur

3 .

Chatha

Sohapur 4.

Bhanpur

Sohapur

Dagdaha

Sohapur

Karui

Sohapur

Mithori

Sohapur

Dulahra

Sohapur 9 .

Sohapur Chhirpani 20

10.

Siguri

Sohapur

Karuatal

11 .

Sohapur

12.

Nipaniya

Sohapur

13.

Baktaval

Sohapur

Remarks

District

Area in (hectares )

Shahdol

381.840

Full

266.542

Shahdol

Full

160.230

Full Shahdol

515.973

Full Shahdol

80.890

Full Shahdol

223.883

Full Shahdol

723.670

174.932

Full Shahdol

Shahdol

206.631

Full

200.448

Shahdol

Part

155.882

Full Shahdol

212.881

Full Shahdol

74.376

Shahdol

Full Total area : 3378.178 ( hectares ) ( approximately ) or 8347.48 acres ( approximately )

3050 G1 /04-5B [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

6739 Boundary description

A-B Line starts from point " A" on the boundary of Mithori village and passes along the Northern boundary of villages Mithori , Dagdaha, Karui and meets at point "B" .

B- C Line passes along the Eastern boundary of villages Karui , Dulahra, Karuatal and meets point "C" .

C-D Line passes along the Southern Boundary of villages Nipaniya, Baktaval, Siguri , then through village Siguri and meets point "D" .

D-A Line passes along the westem boundary of village Siguri , Chhirpani , Chatha Harra, Semriya , Mithori and meets point "A" .

[No.43015/16/2004-P.R.I.W. ] GARGI MUKHERJEE , Director

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2670.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वार्णित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है। अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अधिनियम, 1957, ( 1957 का 20) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त् अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस क्षेत्र में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं ० एमसीएल /एसएएमबी/ जीएम ( सीपी एण्ड पी ) कोणार्क/ 2003/ 16, तारीख 26.12.2003 का निरीक्षण महाप्रबंधक ( सी पी एण्ड पी ) , महानदी कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, जागृति विहार, संबलपुर - 768020 ( उड़ीसा ) के कार्यालय में या कलक्टर और जिला माजिस्ट्रेट अंगुल , उड़ीसा के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चार्टो और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से, नब्बे दिन के भीतर भारसाधक अधिकारी /विभागाध्यक्ष ( राजस्व / सम्पदा), महानदी कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, जागृति विहार, संबलपुर -768020 ( उड़ीसा ) को देंगे । 6740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

अनुसूची

कोोणार्क ब्लाक , तलचेर कोलफील्ड्स

जिला - अंगुल ( उड़ीसा)

पूर्वेक्षण के लिए अधिसूचित भूमि

क्र. सं. ग्राम

पुलिस खाना क्रम

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

टिप्पियां जिला राज्य

खंड

तहसील/ उप

खंड

और सं०

तालचेर

कोलियरी / 11 बाघबासपुर

सोलडा कोलियरी / 12 तालचेर 3

कोलियरी / 10 तालचेर बनबासपुर

कोलियरी / 13 तालचेर तेलीपुर

कोलियरी /09 तालचेर गोपालप्रसाद खमार

कोलियरी / 14 तालचेर खुरिगां

तालचेर सत्यबादीपुर कोलियरी / 20 तेलीपसी

कोलियरी /21 तालचेर सरांग

तालचेर/ 67 तालचेर 10

तालचेर/68 तालचेर किशोरचन्द्रपुर

तालचेर/69 तालचेर जोरागाडिया

कोलियरी / 07 तालचेर गोपालप्रसाद आरक्षित बन

तालचेर

तालचेर/ 66 खजुरीया

तालचेर/22 तालचेर नीलादीपुर

प्रसन्न नगर

तालचेर

कोलियरी / 19

क्षेत्र (एकड़ लगभग)

297.530 संपूर्ण अंगुल /उड़ीसा

2160.060 भाग अंगुल/ उड़ीसा

549.230 भाग अंगुल/उड़ीसा

368.900 संपूर्ण अंगुल/उड़ीसा

132.050 संपूर्ण अंगुल/ उड़ीसा

162.040 संपूर्ण अंगुल / उड़ीसा

संपूर्ण

73.980

अंगुल/उड़ीसा

239.760 संपूर्ण अंगुल/उड़ीसा

248.130 संपूर्ण अंगुल/ उड़ीसा

104.140 संपूर्ण अंगुल/ उड़ीसा

भाग

90.000

अंगुल/उड़ीसा

170.000 भाग अंगुल/उड़ीसा

202.490 संपूर्ण अंगुल/उड़ीसा

संपूर्ण

34.630.

अंगुल/ उड़ीसा

196.660 भाग अंगुल/ उड़ीसा

कुल 5029.60 एकड़ ( लगभग) या 2035.451 हेक्टर ( लगभग) सीमा वर्णनः-

क-ख-ग रेखा सिंगडा नदी के पूर्वी किनारे पा ग्राम बाघबासपुर की उत्तरी सीमा पर बिन्दु ' क ' से आरंभ होती है । यह ग्राम बाघबासपुर, सोलडा, खजूरिया, सरांग और किशोरचन्द्रपुर की उत्तरीसीमा के साथ - साथ पूर्व की ओर बिन्दु ' ख ' तक जाती है । यहां से यह ग्राम जोरागाडिया से होकर पूर्व ओर बिन्दु ' ग ' तक जाती है । 6741 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

ग-घ -ङ

बिन्दु ' ग ' से यह ग्राम जोरागाडिया से होकर दक्षिण की ओर जाती है और ग्राम किशोरचन्द्रपुर की पूर्वी सीमा को बिन्दु ' घ ' पर छूती है। बिन्दु ' घ ' से यह ग्राम किशोरचन्द्रपुर की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ - साथ दक्षिण की ओर बिन्दु ' ङ' तक जाती है ।

ङ- च- छ-ज- झ रेखा बिन्दु ' ङ' से ग्राम किशोरचन्द्रपुर और सरांग की दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ - साथ पश्चिम की ओर बिन्दु ' च ' तक जाती है । तब यह ग्राम प्रसन्नगर की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ- साथ दक्षिण की ओर बिन्दु ' छ' तक जाती है । तब यह ग्राम प्रसन्नगर, सोल्डा और बीश्वरपुर से होती हुई पश्चिम की ओर बिन्दु ' ज ' तक जाती है । तब यह ग्राम खुरिंगा की पूर्वी और दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ- साथ दक्षिण और पश्चिम की और जाती है गोपालप्रसाद खमार की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ - साथ सिंगडा नदी के पूर्वी किनारे पर बिन्दु ' झ ' तक आगे जाती है ।

झ-क

रेखा ग्राम गोपालप्रसाद खमार, बनबासपुर और बाघबासपुर, जो सिंगडा नदी का पूर्वी किनारे है, की पश्चिमी सीम के साथ- साथ उत्तर की और जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।

[ फा. सं. - 43015/21/2004- पी. आर. आई. डब्ल्यू. ]

गार्गी मुखर्जी, निदेशक

New Delhi, the 15th October, 2004

S. O. 2670.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisitions and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein.

The Plan bearing No. MCL / SAMB / GM ( CP & P )/ Konark/ 2003 / 16 dated 26.12.2003 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected at the office of the Chief General Manager ( CP & P) . Mahanadi Coalfields Limited . Jagriti Vihar . Post Office Jagrit Vihar . Sambalpur-- 768020 ( Orissa ) or at the office of the Collector and District Magistrate . Angul . Orissa or at the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Calcutta .

All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred in sub - section ( 7 ) of section 13 of the said Act to the officer - in- charge/Head of the Department ( Revenue /Estate ) , Mahanadi Coalfields Limited Jagriti Vihar Post Office,JagriteVihar , Sambalpur - 768020 ( Orissa ) within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the official Gazette .

6742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii )]

Schedule

Konark Block, Talcher Coalfield District Angul (Orissa)

(Land notified for prospecting )

Remarks

District/ state

Village

SI . no

Area in (acres)

Police station & no

Tahsil/ sub division

297.53

Full

Talcher

Angul /Orissa

Colliery/ 11

Baghabasapur

Part

2160.060

Talcher

Solada

Colliery/ 12

Angul /Orissa

Part

549.230

Talcher Angul /Orissa

Colliery/ 10

Banabaspur

Full

368.900

Talcher

Colliery/13

Angul/Orissa

Telipura

Full

Talcher

132.050

Angul /Orissa

Colliery/9

Gopalprasadkhamar

Full

162.040

Talcher

Colliery/14

Angul /Orissa

Khuringa

Full

73.980

Talcher Angul /Orissa

Colliery/20

Satyabadipur

Full

239.760

Talcher

Angul /Orissa

Tileipasi

Colliery/21

Full

248.130

Talcher/67 Talcher Angul /Orissa

Saranga

Full

104.1400

Talcher

Talcher/ 68

10.

Angul /Orissa

Kishorechandrapur

90.000

Part Talcher/69 Talcher

11 .

Angul/Orissa

Joragadia

170.000

Part Talcher/07 Talcher

12.

Angul/Orissa

Gopalprasad Reserve Forest

Full

202.490

Talcher

13.

Angul /Orissa

Colliery/66

Khajuria

Full

34.630

Angul/Orissa

Talcher

Colliery/22

Niladripur

Part

196.660

Talcher Angul /Orissa

Colliery/19

Prasananagar

Total area : 5029.60 acres ( approximately) or 2035.451 hectares ( approximately ) Boundary description

A-B- C

The line starts from point ' A ' on the northern boundary line of village Baghabaspur on the eastern bank of Singda river. It proceeds towards east along the northern boundary of village Baghabaspur , Solda, Khajuria , Saranga and Kishorechandrapur upto point ' B ' . From here it moves towards east through village Jaragadia upto point ' C' .

C- D- E

From point ' C ' it moves towards south through village Joragadia and touches the eastern boundary line of village Kishorechandrapur at point ' D ' . From point ' D ' it moves towards south along the eastern boundary of village Kishorechandrapur upto point'E' .

E -F -G - H - I From point ' E ' the line moves towards west along the southern boundary of villages Kishorechandrapur and Saranga upto point ' F' . Then it proceeds towards south along the eastern boundary of village Prasananagar upto point ' G ' . Then it moves towards west through villages Prasananagar , Solda and Birabarpur upto point H` . Then it moves towards south and west along the eastern and southern boundary of village Khuringa . Then it proceeds towards north - west through Gupalprasad Reserve Forest and along the western boundary of village Gopalprasad Khamar upto the eastern bank of Singda river at point ' I' .

6743 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

I-A

The line proceeds towards north along the western boundary of village Gopalprasad Khamar , Banabaspur and Raghabaspur which is the eastern bank of Singda river and meets at starting point ' A' .

[No.43015/21 /2004-P.R.I.WJ GARGI MUKHERJEE , Director

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2671.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 (1957 का 20) जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है, की धारा 4 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का० आ० सं० 1979 तारीख 30 जून, 2003 द्वारा , जो भारत के राजपत्र 2, खण्ड 3 , उपखंड (ii), तारीख 19 जुलाई, 2003 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 4695.52 एकड (लगभग ) या 1900.25 (हेक्टेयर) (लगभग) है, कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी । और केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्य है ।

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित 2527.460 एकड (लगभग ) या 1022.849 हेक्टेयर (लगभग) माप की भूमि में सभी अधिकारों अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।

1. इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं० एमसीएल / एस ए एम बी/ महा प्रबंधक (सी.पी. और पी/ गोपालप्रसाद (पश्चिम) / 04 / 28 तारीख 28-4-2004 का निरीक्षण कलक्टर, अंगुल, (उडीसा) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता के कार्यालय में या महानदी कोलफील्डस लिमिटेड (निगमित/ योजना और परियोजना विभाग ) , जाग्रति विहार, डाकघर जाग्रति विहार, बुरला, जिला सम्बलपुर (उडीसा) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

2. उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधो की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है, जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध है :-

अर्जन की बाबत आक्षेप

8 (1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में, जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना गई है, हितबद्ध है, अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्ही अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आक्षेप कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरण :- इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आक्षेप नहीं माना जाएगा कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएँ करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएँ केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नही करनी चाहिए ।

(2) उपधारा 1 के अधीन प्रत्येक आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी को लिखित रूप में किया जाएगा और प्राधिकारी आक्षेपकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसे सभी आक्षेपों के सुनने के पश्चात और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच, यदि कोई हो, करने के पश्चात जो वह आवश्यक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसू! वेत 6744

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आक्षेपों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

(3) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता, यदि भूमि या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते । "

अनुसूची

गोपालप्रसाद (पश्चिम) खंड तलचर कोलफिलडस (हिंगुला क्षेत्र) जिला अंगुल (उडीशा )

सभी अधिकारः-

प्लान सं ० एमसीएल / एसएएमबी / जीएम(सीपी- पी) / गोपालप्रसाद (पश्चिम) / 04 / 28 दिनॉक 28.4.2004

टिप्पणी

क्षेत्र एकड में

ग्राम का नाम

तहीसल /

उपखंड

जिला/ राज्य

पुलिस स्टेशन और सं

क्रम सं.

भाग

छंडिपाडा

225.990

जारापाडा-67

बलीचन्दरपुर

अंगुल / उडीसा

जरापाडा-66

2 पिराखमाना

पूर्ण

246.150

छंडिपाडा

अंगुल / उडीसा

भाग

जरापाडा-64

छोटाबेरिनी

छंडिपाडा

173.780

अंगुल / उडीसा

भाग

कनकेरी

छेंडिपाडा

733.670

जारापाडा-65

अंगुल / उडीसा

भाग

कौंसिधिपा जारापाडा-63

छंडिपाडा

8.930

अंगुल / उडीसा

भाग

तलचर

कोलेरी-01

653.290

भालूगडिया

अंगुल/ उडीसा

तलचर

कोलेरी-01

पूर्ण

40.730

बागुआबोला

अंगुल/ उडीसा

भाग

कनिहा-03

63.500

अंगुल

कुमुदा

अंगुल/ उडीसा

भाग

कोलेरी-01

20.320

अंगुल

कुसुमपाल

अंगुल/ उडीसा

भाग

तलचर

5.000

छेडिपाडा

अंगुल/ उडीसा

जैतपुर रक्षित वन

भाग

तलचर

जारापाडा

356.100

अंगुल/ उडीसा

निसा रक्षित वन

योग

या 2527.460 एकड (लगभग) 1022.849 हेक्टेयर (लगभग ) 6745 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

1. बालीचंदरपुर ग्राम (भाग ) में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट सं ०

1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10, 11 , 12 , 13, 14, 15 , 16, 17 , 18, 19, 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25, 26 , 27, 28, 29 , 30, 31 , 32, 33 , 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 , 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 (भाग) , 46( भाग) , 47 (भाग) , 51 ( भाग) , 52, 53(भाग) , 75 (भाग), 76, 77(भाग) , 78 ( भाग ) , 76/269, 36/271 ( भाग) , 39/272(भाग), 46/273 , 46/274 , 35/284 , 26/288 , 36/291 , 33/292, 15/297 , 177/306, 177/311 (भाग) & 177/329(भाग) .

2. पिराखमाना ग्राम (पूर्ण) में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट सं०

3. छोटाबेरिनी ग्राम (भाग ) में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट सं०

84 (भाग ) , 85 (भाग ) , 87(भाग) , 88, 89, 90, 91 , 92 , 93 , 94, 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99, 100, 101 , 102 , 103, 104 , 105 , 106, 107 , 108, 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115, 116, 117 , 118, 119, 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126, 127 , 128, 129, 130, 131 , 132(भाग ) , 137 (भाग) , 138(भाग ), 140(भाग) , 141 (भाग) , 150(भाग) , 171 (भाग) , 172, 173 , 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181 , 182, 183, 184(भाग) , 187(भाग ) , 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192(भाग) , 193(भाग) , 204(भाग) , 205(भाग), 206(भाग ) , 207, 208 , 209(भाग ) , 210 (भाग) , 213( भाग) , 214 , 215 , 216, 217, 218 , 219, 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230, 231 , 232 , 233 , 234, 235 , 236 , 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 , 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252, 253, 254 , 255, 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260, 261 , 262 , 263, 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268, 269, 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274, 275 , 276 , 277, 278 , 279 , 280, 281 , 282 , 283 , 284, 285 , 286 , 287, 288 , 289, 290, 291 , 292, 293 , 294, 295 , 296, 297 , 298, 299, 300, 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306, 271/311 , 84/312 , 88/323 , 204/325, 229/334, 229/335, 297/336, 296/337, 85/338 ( भाग ) , 270/339 , 92/341 , 243/345 , 243/346, 234/347,272/348 , 285/349 , 278/350, 278/351 , 109/352 , 91/353 , 249/355, 249/356 , 100/357 , 221/359, 97/363 , 251/365 , 234/366, 296/367, 222/368 , 223/369 & 268/370 .

4. कनकेरी ग्राम (भाग ) में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट सं०

1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10, 11 , 12, 13 , 14, 15 , 16, 17 , 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23 , 24 , 25 , 26, 27 , 28 , 29, 30, 31 , 32 , 33 , 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54, 55, 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60, 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69, 70, 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77, 78 , 79, 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86, 87 , 88 , 89, 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97, 98 , 99, 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105 , 106, 107 , 108 , 109 , 110, 111 , 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128, 129, 130, 131 , 132 , 133 , 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139 , 140 , 141 , 142, 143 , 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151 , 152 , 153 , 154, 155, 156, 157, 158 , 159, 160, 161 , 162 , 163 , 164, 165 , 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175, 176, 177 , 178, 179 , 180, 181 , 182 , 183,184 , 185, 186, 187 , 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194, 195, 196 , 197, 198, 199 , 200 , 6746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 201 , 202 , 203 , 204, 205, 206 , 207 , 208 , 209, 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220, 221 , 222 , 223, 224, 225 , 226 , 227, 228, 229 , 230, 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235, 236, 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244, 245 , 246, 247, 248, 249, 250 , 251 , 252 , 253, 254 , 255 , 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262, 263 , 264 , 265, 266, 267, 268 , 269, 270 , 271 , 272 , 273, 274, 275 , 276, 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283, 284, 285, 286 , 287 , 288 , 289, 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294, 295 , 296, 297 , 298 , 299, 300, 301 , 302 , 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308 , 309, 310, 311 , 312 , 313 , 314, 315, 316 , 317, 318, 319, 320, 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325, 326, 327, 328 , 329, 330, 331 , 332 , 333 , 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339 , 340, 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351 , 352 , 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361 , 362, 363 , 364, 365, 366, 367, 368 , 369, 370 , 371 , 372, 373 , 374, 375, 376, 377, 378 , 379, 380 , 381 , 382, 383 , 384, 385 , 386, 387 , 388, 389, 390, 391 , 392, 393 , 394, 395, 396, 397 , 398 , 399, 400 , 401 , 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411 , 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419 , 420, 421 , 422, 423 , 424, 425 , 426, 427, 428 , 429, 430, 431 , 432, 433 , 434, 435 , 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441 , 442 , 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451 , 452, 453 , 454, 455, 456, 457, 458 , 459, 460 , 461 , 462, 463 , 464, 465, 466 , 467, 468 , 469 , 470, 471 , 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480 , 481 , 482 , 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488 , 489, 490 , 491 , 492, 493 , 494, 495, 496, 497, 498 , 499, 500, 501 , 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511 , 512, 513 , 514, 515, 516, 517, 518 , 519, 520, 521 , 522, 523 , 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531 , 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539 , 540, 541 , 542 , 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551 , 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565, 566, 567 , 568, 569, 570, 571 , 572 , 573 , 574, 575, 576, 577 , 578, 579 , 580, 581, 582 , 583 , 584, 585, 586, 587, 588 , 589, 590 , 591 , 592 , 593, 594, 595, 596, 597 , 598, 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603,604, 605 , 606, 607, 608 , 609, 610, 611 , 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618 , 619, 620, 621 , 622 , 623 , 624, 625 , 626, 627, 628 , 629 , 630, 631 , 632 , 633 , 634, 635 , 636, 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644, 645, 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650, 651 , 652, 653, 654, 655 , 656, 657 , 658 , 659 , 660, 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 665, 666, 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676, 677 , 678 , 679, 680, 681 , 682 , 683 , 684, 685, 686, 687, 688, 689, 690, 691 , 692 , 693 , 694, 695, 696 , 697 , 698 , 699, 700, 701 , 702, 703 , 704, 705, 706, 707, 708 , 709, 710 , 711 , 712, 713 , 714, 715, 716, 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724, 725, 726, 727 , 728(भाग) , 735(भाग ), 738(भाग) , 739(भाग) , 740(भाग) , 741 , 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747(भाग), 748(भाग), 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762, 763, 764 , 765, 766, 767, 768 , 769, 770, 771 , 772 , 773 , 774 , 775, 776, 777, 778, 779, 780, 781 , 782 , 783 , 784, 785 , 786, 787, 788 , 789 , 790 , 791 , 792 , 793 , 794, 795, 796, 797 , 798,799 , 800, 801 , 802, 803 , 804, 805, 806, 807, 808 , 809, 810, 811 , 812, 813 , 814, 815, 816, 817, 818 , 819, 820, 821 , 822 , 823 , 824, 825 , 826 , 827,828, 829, 830, 831 , 832 , 833, 834, 835, 836, 837, 838 , 839, 840, 841 , 842, 843 , 844, 845 , 846, 847 , 848 , 849, 850, 851 , 852, 853 , 854, 855 , 856, 857, 858 , 859 , 860, 861 , 862 , 863 , 864, 865 , 866, 867, 868 , 869, 870, 871 , 872 , 873, 874, 875, 876, 877, 878 , 879,880, 881 , 882 , 883 , 884, 885, 886, 887, 888 , 889 , 890, 891 , 892, 893 , 894, 895 , 896, 897 , 898 , 899 , 900, 901 , 902 , 903 , 904 , 905 , 906, 907, 908 , 909, 910, 911 , 912, 913 , 914, 915, 916, 917 , 918, 919, 920, 921 , 922, 923 , 924 , 925 , 926, 927, 928 , 929 , 930, 931 , 932 , 933, 934, 935 , 936, 937 , 938 , 939 , 940, 941 , 942 943,944, 945, 946 , 947 , 948 , 949, 950, 951 , 952, 953 , 954, 955 , 956 , 957 , 958 , 959 , 960 , 961 , 962 , 963, 964, 965, 966, 967, 968, 969 , 970 , 971 , 972, 973 , 974, 975 , 976, 977 , 978 , 979 , 980 , 981 , 982 , 983 , 984, 985 , 986 , 987, 988 , 989 , 990, 991 , 992, 993 , 994, 995 , 996 , 997, 998 , 999 , 1000 , 1001 , 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011 , 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021 , 1022, 1023 , 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027 , 1028 , 1029, 1030, 1031 , 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041 , 1042, 1043 , 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047 , 1048 , 1049, 1050, 1051 , 1052, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058 , 6747 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1299 , 1300 , 1301 , 1302, 1303, 1304, 1305, 1306, 1307, 1308, 1309, 1310, 1311 , 1312, 1313 , 1314 , 1315 , 1316, 1317, 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321, 1322 , 1323 , 1324, 1325 , 1326, 1327 , 1328, 1344 , 1345, 1346, 1347 , 1348, 1349, 1350, 1351 , 1352, 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356, 1357, 1358, 1359 , 1360, 1361 , 1362, 1363 , 1364, 1365, 1366, 1367, 1368, 1369, 1370, 1371 , 1372 , 1373 , 1374 , 1375, 1376, 1377 , 1378, 1379, 1380, 1381 , 1382, 1383, 1384, 1385, 1386, 1387 , 1388, 1389 , 1390, 1391 , 1392, 1393, 1394, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398, 1399, 1400, 1401 , 1402, 1403 , 1479 , 1480 , 1481 , 1482, 1483 , 1484, 1485, 1486, 1487, 1488, 1489, 1490, 1491, 1492 , 1493 , 1494 , 1495 , 1496, 1497, 1498 , 1499, 1500, 1501, 1502 , 1503, 1504, 1505, 1506, 1507, 1508, 1509 , 1510, 1511 , 1512 , 1513 , 1514, 1515, 1516, 1517, 1518, 1519, 1520, 1521 , 1522 , 1523 , 1524 , 1525 , 1526, 1527, 1528, 1529, 1530, 1531 , 1532, 1533 , 1534, 1535, 1536, 1537, 1538, 1539, 1540, 1541 , 1542, 1543 , 1544, 1545, 1546, 1547, 1548, 1549, 1550, 1551 , 1552, 1553 , 1554 , 1555 , 1556, 1557, 1558, 1559, 1560, 1561 , 1562, 1563 , 1564, 1565, 1566, 1567, 1568, 1569, 1570 , 1571 , 1572, 1573 , 1574, 1575, 1576, 1577, 1578, 1579, 1580, 1581 , 1582, 1583 , 1584, 1585 , 1586, 1587 , 1588, 1589, 1590, 1591 , 1592 , 1593 , 1594, 1595, 1596, 1597, 1598 , 1059, 1060 , 1061 , 1062, 1063 , 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067, 1068, 1069 , 1070, 1071 , 1072 , 1073, 1074, 1075 , 1076, 1077, 1078, 1079, 1080, 1081 , 1082, 1083, 1084, 1085, 1086, 1087, 1088 , 1089, 1090, 1091 , 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097 , 1098 , 1099, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105 , 1106, 1107 , 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111 , 1112, 1113 , 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1118, 1119 , 1120, 1121 , 1122, 1123 , 1124 , 1125, 1126, 1127 , 1128, 1129, 1130, 1131 , 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135 , 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141 , 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146, 1147, 1148, 1149 , 1150, 1151 , 1152, 1153, 1154, 1155, 1156, 1157, 1158, 1159, 1160, 1161 , 1162, 1163 , 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167, 1168 , 1169, 1170, 1171 , 1172, 1173, 1174, 1175, 1176, 1177, 1178, 1179 , 1180 , 1181, 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1186, 1187, 1188, 1189, 1190, 1191 , 1192, 1193 , 1194 , 1195 , 1196, 1197, 1198, 1199, 1200, 1201 , 1202 , 1203 , 1204, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1209 , 1210 , 1211 , 1212, 1213 , 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221 , 1222, 1223 , 1224 , 1225 , 1226, 1227, 1228 , 1229, 1230, 1231 , 1232 , 1233 , 1234, 1235, 1236, 1237, 1238, 1239 , 1240, 1241 , 1242,1243 , 1244, 1245, 1246, 1247 , 1248 , 1249, 1250, 1251 , 1252, 1253 , 1254, 1255, 1256, 1257, 1258, 1259, 1260, 1261 , 1262 , 1263, 1264, 1265 , 1266, 1267, 1268, 1269, 1270 , 1271 , 1272 , 1273, 1274, 1275 , 1276, 1277, 1278, 1279, 1280, 1281 , 1282, 1283, 1284, 1285 , 1286, 1287, 1288 , 1289, 1290, 1291 , 1292, 1293 , 1294 , 1295 , 1296, 1297, 1298, 1329 , 1330, 1331 , 1332, 1333, 1334, 1335, 1336, 1337, 1338, 1339, 1340, 1341 , 1342, 1343, 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407 , 1408, 1409, 1410, 1411, 1412, 1413 , 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1418, 1419 , 1420, 1421 , 1422, 1423, 1424, 1425, 1426, 1427 , 1428, 1429 , 1430, 1431, 1432, 1433, 1434, 1435 , 1436, 1437, 1438, 1439 , 1440 , 1441 , 1442 , 1443 , 1444, 1445, 1446, 1447, 1448, 1449, 1450, 1451 , 1452, 1453, 1454, 1455, 1456, 1457, 1458, 1459, 1460, 1461, 1462 , 1463, 1464, 1465, 1466, 1467 , 1468 , 1469, 1470, 1471 , 1472, 1473, 1474 , 1475 , 1476, 1477 , 1478, 1599, 1600, 1601 , 1602, 1603 , 1604, 1605, 1606, 1607, 1608, 1609 , 1610, 1611 , 1612, 1613 , 1614, 1615, 1616, 1617 , 1618, 1619, 1620, 1621 , 1622, 1623 , 1624, 1625, 1626, 1627, 1628, 1629, 1630, 1631 , 1632, 1633, 1634,1635, 1636, 1637, 1638, 1639 , 1640, 1641 , 1642, 1643 , 1644 , 1645 , 1646, 1647 , 1648 , 1649, 1650, 1651, 1652, 1653 , 1654, 1655, 1656, 1657, 1658, 1659 , 1660, 1661 , 1662, 1663 , 1664, 1665, 1666, 1667, 1668 , 1669 , 1670, 1671 , 1672, 1673, 1674, 1675 , 1676, 1677 , 1678, 1679, 1680, 1681 , 1682, 1683 , 1684, 1685, 1686(भाग) , 1689(भाग) , 1690(भाग) , 1692(भाग), 1726(भाग ), 1727(भाग) , 1728 1729 1730, 1731, 1732, 1733, 1734 , 1735 , 1736, 1737, 1738, 1739(P), 1740(भाग) , 1743, 1744, 1745, 1746(भाग), 1747(भाग), 1748(भाग ) , 1760 (भाग ), 1829, 1830, 1831 (भाग) , 1837 (भाग) , 1848(भाग ), 1849 (भाग) , 1850, 1851, 1852, 1853, 1854 , 1855, 1856, 1857, 1858 , 1859, 1860 , 1861 , 1862, 1863, 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867, 6748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1868, 1869, 1870(भाग), 1871, 1872, 1873 , 1874,1875, 1876( भाग ), 1877 ( भाग ), 26/1942, 83/1943 , 595/1944 , 607/1945, 607/1946, 850/1947, 1031/1948, 1024/1949 , 757/1950 , 1524/1951 , 598/1952 , 946/1953 , 334/1954, 83/1955 , 1417/1957 , 465 / 1958,1521 / 1959 , 295/1963 , 1674/1964 , 1674/1965 , 1673/1966, 1676/1971 , 89/1972 , 495/1973 , 774/1974, 60/1976, 60/1977 , 62/1978 , 624/1979 , 783/1980 , 685/1981 , 63/1982 , 94/1983 , 1866/1990 , 38/1993 , 61/1994, 1384/1996, 1680/2001 , 221/2003, 1246/2004, 83/2005 , 60/2006 , 1417/2007, 780/2008 , 498/2009 , 241/2010 , 1392/2011 , 246/2012, 1105/2016, 778/2017 , 1865/2018 , 330/2019 , 334/2020 , 543/2022 , 552/2023 , 500/2024 , 199/2025 , 557/2026, 1870/2173(भाग), 1870/2176, 1870/2177 , 1870/2178 , 1870/2179 , 1870/2180, 1870/2181 (भाग), 1870/2182 , 1870/2183, 1870/2184 , 1870/2194(भाग) , 1870/2195 & 1870/2196(भाग).

5. कौंसिधिपा ग्राम (भाग) में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट सं ०

800(भाग) , 801 , 802 , 803 , 804, 805 , 806(भाग ) , 807(भाग ) , 808(भाग ) , & 809(भाग) .

6. भालूगडिआ ग्राम (भाग ) में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट सं०

1 , 2, 3 , 4, 5 , 6, 7 , 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13 , 14, 15 , 16, 17 , 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25 , 26, 27 , 28, 29 , 30, 31, 32, 33 , 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 , 39, 40, 41 , 42 , 43 , 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57, 58 , 59, 60, 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70, 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82, 83 , 84, 85, 86, 87 , 88 , 89, 90 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94, 95 , 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113, 114, 115 , 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125, 126 , 127 , 128, 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135, 136, 137, 138 , 139, 140, 141 , 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153 , 154, 155 , 156, 157 , 158, 159 , 160, 161 , 162 , 163, 164, 165 , 166, 167 , 168 , 169, 170, 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177, 178, 179, 180, 181 , 182 , 183,184 , 185, 186 , 187 , 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194, 195, 196, 197 , 198, 199, 200, 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205, 206, 207 , 208, 209, 210, 211 , 212, 213 , 214 , 215, 216, 217 , 218, 219 , 220, 221 , 222 , 223 , 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231 , 232 , 233 , 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 , 239, 240 , 241 , 242, 243 , 244, 245 , 246, 247, 248 , 249, 250, 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255, 256, 257 .

258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264, 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269, 270, 271 , 272 , 273 , 274, 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280, 281 , 282 , 283 , 284, 285, 286, 287 , 288, 289 , 290 , 291 , 292, 293 , 294, 295, 296, 297 , 298 , 299, 300, 301 , 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308 , 309, 310 , 311 , 312, 313 , 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321 , 322 , 323, 324 , 325, 326, 327, 328 , 329 , 330, 331 , 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338 , 339, 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345, 346, 347, 348 , 349, 350, 351 , 352, 353, 354, 355, 356 , 357, 358, 359 , 360, 361 , 362 , 363 , 364, 365, 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370, 371 .

372, 373 , 374 , 375, 376, 377, 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394, 395 , 396, 397, 398 , 399 , 400, 401 , 402 , 403, 404, 405 , 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411 , 412 , 413 , 414, 415, 416, 417 , 418 , 419, 420, 421 , 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428 , 429, 430 , 431 , 432 , 433 , 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441 , 442 , 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452, 453 , 454, 455, 456, 457, 458 , 459, 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464, 465, 466, 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473, 474, 475, 476, 477 , 478 , 479, 480 , 481 , 482 , 483, 484,485, 486, 487, 488 , 489, 490, 491 , 492, 493, 494 , 495, 496 , 497, 498 , 499, 500, 501 , 502, 503, 504, 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509, 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514, 515, 516, 517 , 518 , 519, 520 , 521 , 522,523 .

524, 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529, 530, 531 , 532, 533 , 534, 535 , 536, 537, 538 , 539 , 540, 541 , 542 , 543, 544, 545 , 546, 547, 548 , 549, 550, 551 , 552, 553 , 554, 555, 556 , 557, 558 , 559, 560, 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569, 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574, 575 , 576 , 577,578,579 , 580 .

6749 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590, 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595, 596, 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604, 605 , 606, 607 , 608 ,

988 , 989 , 990, 991 , 992 , 993 , 994 , 995 , 996, 997, 998, 999, 1000, 1001 , 1002, 1003 , 1004, 1005 , 1006, 1007 , 1008 , 1009, 1010, 1011 , 1012 , 1013 , 1014 , 1015 , 1016, 1017 , 1018 , 1019, 1020 , 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024 , 1025 , 1026, 1027, 1028 , 1029, 1030 , 1031 , 1032, 1033 , 1034 , 1035 , 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084, 1085 , 1086, 1087, 1088 , 1089 , 1090, 1091 , 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095 ,

1125,

1140, 1141 , 1142, 1143 , 1144, 1145, 1146, 1147 , 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151 , 1152 , 1153 , 1154, 1155,

1170,

1245 ,

1290,

1305, 609 , 610, 611 , 612 , 613 , 614, 615, 616, 617 , 618, 619, 620, 621 , 622 , 623 , 624, 625 , 626 , 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635, 636, 637, 638 , 639, 640, 641 , 642 , 643 , 644, 645 , 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654, 655, 656, 657 , 658 , 659, 660, 661 , 662 , 663 , 664, 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670, 671 , 672 , 673 , 674, 675 , 676, 677 , 678 , 679 , 680, 681 , 682 , 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694, 695 , 696, 697 , 698 , 699 , 700, 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706, 707 , 708 , 709 , 710, 711 , 712 , 713 , 714, 715 , 716 , 717, 718 , 719, 720, 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729, 730 , 731 , 732 , 733 , 734, 735 , 736, 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741 , 742, 743 , 744, 745, 746, 747 , 748 , 749 , 750, 751 , 752 , 753, 754 , 755, 756 , 757, 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 , 772 , 773 , 774 , 775 , 776 , 777 , 778 , 779 , 780, 781 , 782 , 783 , 784 , 785, 786, 787 , 788 , 789 , 790 , 791 , 792 , 793 , 794,795 , 796, 797 , 798,799 , 800 , 801 , 802 , 803 , 804, 805 , 806 , 807 , 808 , 809 , 810 , 811 , 812 , 813 , 814 , 815, 816 , 817, 818 , 819 , 820 , 821 , 822 , 823 , 824, 825 , 826, 827,828 , 829 , 830, 831 , 832, 833 , 834, 835 , 836, 837 , 838, 839 , 840 , 841 , 842 , 843, 844, 845, 846, 847, 848 , 849 , 850 , 851 , 852 , 853 , 854 , 855 , 856 , 857, 858, 859, 860, 861 , 862, 863 , 864 , 865, 866 , 867, 868 , 869 , 870 , 871 , 872 , 873 , 874 , 875 , 876 , 877, 878, 879 , 880, 881 , 882 , 883 , 884 , 885 , 886 , 887 , 888 , 889, 890, 891 , 892 , 893 , 894 , 895 , 896, 897, 898 , 899 , 900, 901 , 902 , 903 , 904 , 905 , 906, 907 , 908 , 909, 910, 911 , 912, 913 , 914 , 915, 916, 917, 918 , 919 , 920, 921 , 922, 923 , 924, 925 , 926 , 927 , 928, 929 , 930 , 931 , 932 , 933 , 934, 935, 936, 937 , 938 , 939, 940, 941 , 942 943,944, 945, 946 , 947 , 948 , 949 , 950 , 951 , 952 , 953 , 954, 955 , 956 , 957 , 958 , 959 , 960, 961 , 962, 963 , 964 , 965 , 966, 967 , 968 , 969, 970 , 971 , 972 , 973 , 974, 975 , 976 , 977, 978, 979 , 980, 981 , 982 , 983 , 984, 985 , 986, 987 , 1036, 4037 , 1038 , 1039, 1040 , 1041 , 1042 , 1043 , 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047 , 1048 , 1049, 1050, 1051 , 1052 , 1053 , 1054 , 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058 , 1059, 1060, 1061 , 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065 , 1066, 1067, 1068 , 1069, 1070, 1071 , 1072, 1073 , 1074, 1075, 1076, 1077 , 1078 , 1079, 1080, 1096, 1097, 1098, 1099, 1100, 1101 , 1102, 1103 , 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107 , 1108, 1109 , 1110, 1111 , 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117 , 1118, 1119 , 1120 , 1121 , 1122 , 1123 , 1124, 1126 , 1127 , 1128 , 1129 , 1130, 1131 , 1132, 1133 , 1134, 1135, 1136 , 1137, 1138 , 1139 , 1156 , 1157 , 1158 , 1159, 1160, 1161 , 1162, 1163 , 1164 , 1165, 1166 , 1167, 1168, 1169 , 1171 , 1172 , 1173 , 1174, 1175, 1176, 1177 , 1178 , 1179, 1180, 1181 , 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185 , 1186 , 1187 , 1188 , 1189, 1190, 1191, 1192 , 1193, 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197, 1198, 1199, 1200 , 1201 , 1202 , 1203 , 1204 , 1205, 1206, 1207 , 1208 , 1209 , 1210, 1211 , 1212 , 1213 , 1214 , 1215, 1216 , 1217 , 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221 , 1222 , 1223 , 1224 , 1225, 1226, 1227 , 1228 , 1229 , 1230, 1231 , 1232 , 1233 , 1234, 1235 , 1236, 1237, 1238 , 1239 , 1240, 1241 , 1242 , 1243 , 1244, 1246 , 1247, 1248, 1249, 1250, 1251 , 1252 , 1253 , 1254, 1255 , 1256 , 1257 , 1258 , 1259 , 1260, 1261 , 1262 , 1263 , 1264 , 1265,1266, 1267 , 1268 , 1269 , 1270, 1271 , 1272, 1273 , 1274 , 1275 , 1276 , 1277 , 1278 , 1279, 1280, 1281 , 1282 , 1283 , 1284, 1285, 1286, 1287 , 1288, 1289, 1291 , 1292 , 1293 , 1294 , 1295, 1296, 1297 , 1298 , 1299 , 1300 , 1301 , 1302 , 1303 , 1304, 1306 , 1307, 1308 , 1309 , 1310, 1311 , 1312, 1313 , 1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321 , 1322 , 1323 , 1324 , 1325, 1326, 1327, 1328, 1329 , 1330, 1331 , 1332, 1333 , 1334, 1335, 6750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTA 1. 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1336, 1337, 1338 , 1339, 1340, 1341 , 1342, 1343 , 1344, 1345 , 1346 , 1347, 1348, 1349, 1350 , 1351 , 1352 , 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356, 1357, 1358 , 1359 , 1360, 1361 , 1362 , 1363 , 1364 , 1365, 1366 , 1367 , 1368, 1369 , 1370, 1371 , 1372 , 1373 , 1374, 1375, 1376, 1377 , 1378 , 1379, 1380, 1381 , 1382, 1383 , 1384 , 1385, 1386, 1387, 1388 , 1389 , 1390 , 1391 , 1392, 1393 , 1394 , 1395 , 1396 , 1397, 1398 , 1399, 1400, 1401 , 1402, 1403 , 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407, 1408 , 1409, 1410, 1411 , 1412 , 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1418 , 1419, 1420, 1421 , 1422 , 1423, 1424, 1425 , 1426 , 1427, 1428 , 1429 , 1430, 1431, 1432 , 1433 , 1434, 1435 , 1436, 1437 , 1438, 1439 , 1440, 1441 , 1442 , 1443, 1444, 1445 , 1446, 1447, 1448, 1449, 1450, 1451 , 1452, 1453 , 1454, 1455, 1456 , 1457 , 1458 , 1459 , 1460, 1461 , 1462 , 1463, 1464, 1465, 1466, 1467, 1468 , 1469, 1470, 1471 , 1472, 1473, 1474, 1475, 1476, 1477, 1478, 1479, 1480, 1481 , 1482 , 1483, 1484, 1485 , 1486 , 1487 , 1488, 1489 , 1490, 1491 , 1492, 1493 , 1494, 1495 , 1496, 1497, 1498 , 1499 , 1500, 1501 , 1502 , 1503 , 1504, 1505 , 1506 , 1507 , 1508, 1509, 1510 , 1511 , 1512, 1513, 1514, 1515, 1516 , 1517 , 1518 , 1519 , 1520 , 1521 , 1522, 1523 , 1524 , 1525, 1526 , 1527 , 1528 , 1529, 1530, 1531 , 1532 , 1533 , 1534, 1535 , 1536, 1537 , 1538, 1539 , 1540, 1541 , 1542, 1543 , 1544, 1545, 1546, 1547 , 1548 , 1549 , 1550 , 1551 , 1552 , 1553, 1554, 1555, 1556, 1557, 1558 , 1559, 1560 , 1561 , 1562 , 1563 , 1564, 1565 , 1566 , 1567, 1568 , 1569, 1570 , 1571 , 1572 , 1573, 1574, 1575, 1576 , 1577 , 1578 , 1579 , 1580 , 1581 , 1582, 1583 , 1584 , 1585, 1586, 1587 , 1588 , 1589 , 1590 , 1591 , 1592 , 1593 , 1594, 1595 , 1596, 1597 , 1598 , 1599, 1600, 1601 , 1602 , 1603 , 1604, 1605 , 1606 , 1607 , 1608, 1609, 1610, 1611, 1612, 1613, 1614 , 1615 , 1616, 1617, 1618 , 1619, 1620, 1621 , 1622 , 1623 , 1624, 1625, 1626, 1627, 1628, 1629, 1630, 1631 , 1632, 1633, 1634, 1635 , 1636 , 1637 , 1638 , 1639, 1640 , 1641 , 1642 , 1643 , 1644 , 1645 , 1646, 1647, 1648 , 1649, 1650, 1651 , 1652 , 1653, 1654, 1655, 1656, 1657, 1658 , 1659 , 1660 , 1661 , 1662, 1663 , 1664, 1665 , 1666 , 1667 , 1668 , 1669, 1670 , 1671 , 1672 , 1673 , 1674 , 1675 , 1676, 1677 , 1678 , 1679, 1680, 1681 , 1682 , 1683 , 1684, 1685 , 1686 , 1687, 1688 , 1689, 1690, 1691 , 1692 , 1693 , 1694 , 1695 , 1696 , 1697 , 1698, 1699, 1700 , 1701 , 1702, 1703, 1704 , 1705, 1706, 1707, 1708 , 1709, 1710, 1711 , 1712, 1713 , 1714, 1715 , 1716 , 1717, 1718, 1719, 1720, 1721 , 1722, 1723 , 1724 , 1725, 1726 , 1727 , 1728 , 1729, 1730 , 1731 , 1732 , 1733 , 1734, 1735 , 1736, 1737, 1738 , 1739 , 1740, 1741 , 1742 , 1743 , 1744 , 1745 , 1746 , 1747, 1748, 1749 , 1750 , 1751 , 1752 , 1753 , 1754, 1755, 1756, 1757 , 1758 , 1759 , 1760, 1761 , 1762 , 1763 , 1764 , 1765 , 1766, 1767, 1768 , 1769, 1770 , 1771 , 1772 , 1773 , 1774 , 1775 , 1776, 1777 , 1778 , 1779 , 1780, 1781 , 1782, 1783 , 1784 , 1785 , 1786 , 1787 , 1788 , 1789, 1790 , 1791 , 1792, 1793 , 1794, 1795 , 1796, 1797, 1798, 1799, 1800, 1801 , 1802 , 1803 , 1804 , 1805 , 1806, 1807 , 1808 , 1809, 1810 , 1811 , 1812, 1813 , 1814, 1815 , 1816 , 1817 , 1818, 1819 , 1820, 1821 , 1822 , 1823 , 1824, 1825 , 1826 , 1827 , 1828 , 1829 , 1830, 1831 , 1832 , 1833 , 1834, 1835 , 1836, 1837, 1838 , 1839, 1840, 1841 , 1842, 1843, 1844, 1845, 1846 , 1847 , 1848 , 1849 , 1850 , 1851 , 1852 , 1853 , 1854, 1855 , 1856, 1857 , 1858 , 1859 , 1860, 1861 , 1862 , 1863 , 1864 , 1865 , 1866 , 1867 , 1868 , 1869, 1870 , 1871 , 1872 , 1873 , 1874 , 1875 , 1876 , 1877 , 1878 , 1879, 1880, 1881 , 1882 , 1883 , 1884 , 1885, 1886 , 1887 , 1888 , 1889 , 1890 , 1891 , 1892 , 1893 , 1894, 1895 , 1896, 1897 , 1898 , 1899, 1900, 1901 , 1902 , 1903 , 1904 , 1905 , 1906 , 1907 , 1908 , 1909, 1910, 1911 , 1912 , 1913 , 1914, 1915 , 1916, 1917, 1918, 1919 , 1920, 1921 , 1922 , 1923 , 1924, 1925 , 1926 , 1927 , 1928 , 1929 , 1930, 1931 , 1932 , 1933 , 1934, 1935 , 1936 , 1937 , 1938 , 1939, 1940, 1941 , 1942, 1943 , 1944, 1945 , 1946 , 1947 , 1948 , 1949 , 1950 , 1951 , 1952 , 1953 , 1954 , 1955, 1956, 1957 , 1958 , 1959 , 1960, 1961 , 1962 , 1963 , 1964 , 1965, 1966 , 1967, 1968 , 1969, 1970 , 1971 , 1972 , 1973 , 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977 , 1978 , 1979 , 1980 , 1981 , 1982 , 1983 , 1984 , 1985 , 1986 , 1987, 1988 , 1989, 1990 , 1991 , 1992 , 1993 , 1994 , 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 , 1999, 2000, 2001 , 2002 , 2003 , 2004, 2005, 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009, 2010, 2011 , 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015, 2016 , 2017, 2018 , 2019, 2020 , 2021 , 2022 , 2023 , 2024, 2025, 6751 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2026 , 2027 , 2028 , 2029 , 2030, 2031 , 2032 , 2033 , 2034 , 2035 , 2036 , 2037, 2038 , 2039 , 2040, 2041 , 2042 , 2043 , 2044 , 2045 , 2046 , 2047, 2048 , 2049 , 2050 , 2051 , 2052 , 2053 , 2054 , 2055, 2056, 2057 , 2058 , 2059 , 2060 , 2061 , 2062, 2063 , 2064, 2065, 2066 , 2067 , 2068, 2069, 2070, 2071 , 2072 , 2073 , 2074 , 2075 , 2076 , 2077 , 2078 , 2079 , 2080, 2081 , 2082 , 2083 , 2084 , 2085 , 2086 , 2087 , 2088 , 2089, 2090, 2091 , 2092 , 2093 , 2094 , 2095 , 2096 , 2097, 2098, 2099 , 2100, 2101 , 2102 , 2103 , 2104, 2105, 2106 , 2107 , 2108 , 2109 , 2110 , 2111 , 2112 , 2113 , 2114, 2115, 2116 , 2117, 2118 , 2119, 2120, 2121 , 2122, 2123 , 2124, 2125 , 2126, 2127 , 2128, 2129, 2130, 2131 , 2132 , 2133 , 2134, 2135, 2136, 2137 , 2138 , 2139, 2140, 2141 , 2142 , 2143, 2144 , 2145, 2146 , 2147 , 2148 , 2149 , 2150 , 2151 , 2152 , 2153 , 2154, 2155, 2156, 2157 , 2158 , 2159, 2160 , 2161 , 2162 , 2163 , 2164 , 2165 , 2166, 2167 , 2168 , 2169 , 2170 , 2171 , 2172 , 2173, 2174,2175, 2176 , 2177 , 2178 , 2179 , 2180 , 2181 , 2182, 2183 , 2184 , 2185, 2186, 2187 , 2188 , 2189 , 2190,2191 , 2192 , 2193 , 2194, 2195 , 2196, 2197 , 2198 , 2199, 2200 , 2201 , 2202 , 2203,2204, 2205 , 2206 , 2207 , 2208 , 2209, 2210 , 2211 , 2212 , 2213 , 2214, 2215, 2216, 2217, 2218 , 2219 , 2220 , 2221 , 2222, 2223 , 2224, 2225 , 2226, 2227 , 2228 , 2229 , 2230, 2231 , 2232, 2233 , 2234, 2235, 2236 , 2237 , 2238 , 2239, 2240 , 2241 , 2242 , 2243 , 2244, 2245 , 2246, 2247, 2248 , 2249 , 2250, 2251 , 2252 , 2253 , 2254, 2255, 2256, 2257 , 2258 , 2259, 2260, 2261 , 2262 , 2263 , 2264 , 2265 , 2266 , 2267 , 2268 , 2269 , 2270, 2271 , 2272 , 2273 , 2274, 2275, 2276, 2277 , 2278, 2279, 2280, 2281 , 2282, 2283 , 2284 , 2285 , 2286, 2287 , 2288 , 2289 , 2290 , 2291 , 2292 , 2293, 2294, 2295 , 2296, 2297 , 2298, 2299 , 2300, 2301 , 2302 , 2303 , 2304, 2305 , 2306, 2307, 2308 , 2309 , 2310 , 2311 , 2312 , 2313 , 2314, 2315 , 2316 , 2317 , 2318 , 2319 , 2320 , 2321 , 2322, 2323, 2324, 2325, 2326 , 2327 , 2328 , 2329 , 2330, 2331 , 2332 , 2333 , 2334, 2335, 2336, 2337, 2338 , 2339, 2340 , 2341 , 2342 , 2343 , 2344, 2345 , 2346, 2347, 2348, 2349, 2350, 2351 , 2352, 2353 , 2354, 2355, 2356, 2357, 2358, 2359 , 2360 , 2361 , 2362 , 2363 , 2364 , 2365, 2366, 2367 , 2368 , 2369 , 2370, 2371 , 2372 , 2373 , 2374 , 2375, 2376 , 2377 , 2378 , 2379, 2380, 2381 , 2382, 2383 , 2384, 2385, 2386, 2387 , 2388 , 2389 , 2390 , 2391 , 2392, 2393 , 2394, 2395 , 2396, 2397, 2398 , 2399,2400 , 2401 , 2402 , 2403 , 2404 , 2405 , 2406, 2407 , 2408 , 2409, 2410 , 2411 , 2412 , 2413, 2414, 2415 , 2416, 2417, 2418 , 2419 , 2420, 2421 , 2422, 2423 , 2424, 2425 , 2426, 2427, 2428, 2429, 2430, 2431 , 2432, 2433 , 2434, 2435 , 2436, 2437 , 2438 , 2439, 2440, 2441 , 2442,2443 , 2444, 2445 , 2446, 2447, 2448 , 2449 , 2450 , 2451 , 2452, 2453 , 2454, 2455, 2456, 2457, 2458 , 2459 , 2460 , 2461 , 2462 , 2463 , 2464 , 2465 , 2466, 2467 , 2468 , 2469, 2470, 2471 , 2472 , 2473 , 2474, 2475 , 2476, 2477 , 2478 , 2479 , 2480, 2481 , 2482, 2483 , 2484, 2485 , 2486 , 2487 , 2488 , 2489 , 2490 , 2491 , 2492 , 2493 , 2494, 2495 , 2496 , 2497 , 2498 , 2499,2500 , 2501 , 2502, 2503 , 2504, 2505, 2506, 2507, 2508 , 2509, 2510, 2511 , 2512 , 2513 , 2514, 2515, 2516 , 2517 , 2518 , 2519 , 2520 , 2521 , 2522 , 2523 , 2524, 2525, 2526, 2527 , 2528, 2529, 2530, 2531 , 2532, 2533, 2534, 2535 , 2536, 2537 , 2538, 2539, 2540 , 2541 , 2542, 2543, 2544, 2545 , 2546, 2547, 2548 , 2549 , 2550 , 2551 , 2552, 2553, 2554 , 2555, 2556, 2557 , 2558 , 2559 , 2560 , 2561 , 2562 , 2563 , 2564, 2565 , 2566, 2567 , 2568 , 2569, 2570 , 2571 , 2572 , 2573,2574,2575、2576 , 2577 , 2578 , 2579,2580 , 2581 , 2583 , 2007/2584, 2029/2585 , 2028/2586 , 1912/2587 , 160/2588 , 291/2589 ( P ) , 1788/2590 , 2057/2591 , 1/2592 , 12/2593 , 22/2594 , 1550/2595 , 448/2596, 449/2597 , 477/2598 , 125/2599 , 996/2600 , 762/2601 , 1235/2602 , 564/2603 , 1450/2604 , 1499/2605, 2165/2606 , 2165/2607 , 42/2608 , 1522/2609 , 2123/2610 , 2498/2611 , 2090/2612 , 1521/2613 , 1521/2614 , 1521/2615 , 1278/2616, 119/2617 , 1456/2618 , 69/2619, 1519/2620 , 2417/2621 , 2073/2622 , 2083/2623 , 479/2624 , 2122/2625 , 1968/2626 , 2144/2627, 1570/2628 , 1913/2629 , 2089/2630 , 1725/2631 , 1074/2632 , 2220/2633 , 1778/2634 , 583/2635 , 36/2636, 36/2637 , 1467/2638 , 1765/2639 , 1765/2640 , 1765/2641 , 1765/2642 , 1765/2643 , 1731/2644, 2007/2645 , 2008/2646 , 2013/2647 , 2013/2648 , 2577/2649 , 2574/2650 , 2574/2651 , 2574/2652 , 2553/2653 , 158/2654 , 6752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1, 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 158/2655 , 158/2656, 158/2657 , 158/2658 , 392/2659 , 1828/2660 , 2113/2661 , 2270/2662 , 2272/2663 , 2271/2664 , 280/2665 , 1191/2666, 162/2667 , 2369/2668 , 2370/2669 , 2368/2670, 576/2671 , 787/2672 , 1789/2673 , 503/2674 , 1314/2675 , 1315/2676, 2464/2677 , 2287/2678 , 384/2679, 384/2680, 148/2681 , 1727/2682, 1557/2683 , 2572/2684, 2531/2685 , 62/2686 , 62/2687 , 2156/2688 , 2319/2689, 2246/2690, 2471/2691 , 191/2692, 2553/2693 , 1028/2694, 2180/2695 , 2358/2696, 1833/2697 , 2025/2698 , 1016/2699, 1010/2700, 1008/2701 , 520/2702 , 1012/2703 , 1016/2704, 1815/2705 , 1816/2706 , 1787/2707 , 425/ 2708,2154/ 2709 , 889/2710, 46/2711 , 2553/2712 , 2163/2713 , 2193/2714 , 2193/2715, 2412/2716, 171/2717, 1365/2718 , 270/2719 , 452/2720, 380/2721 & 32/2722 .

7. बागुआबोला ग्राम (पूण) में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट सं०

100, 101 , 102 , 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 , 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113 , 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 , 120 & 83/121 .

8. कुमुंदा ग्राम (भाग) में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट सं ०

650 , 651 , 652 , 656 , 950 , 951 , 952, 953 , 954, 955, 956 , 957 , 958 ; 959, 960, 961 , 962 , 963 , 964 , 965 , 966, 967 , 972, 973 , 974, 975 , 976, 977 , 978 , 979, 980, 981 , 982 , 983 , 984 , 985 , 986 , 987 , 988 , 989, 990, 991 , 992, 993 , 994, 995, 1404, 978/5782 , 979/5783 , 1404/5785 , 984/5803 , 956/6013 , 956/6014 & 956/6015 .

9. कुसुमपाल ग्राम (भाग) में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट सं ०

345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351 , 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358 , 359, 360, 361 , 362 , 363 , 364, 365 , 366, 367, 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 434, 450/989 & 434/1085 .

सीमा वर्णन

क- ख - ग- घ- रेखा ग्राम कुमुदा भालुगाडिआ और कुसुमपाल के त्रयीमिलन स्तम्भ बिन्दु " क" से आरंभ होती है फिर घुरूडियानाला के पूर्वी किनारे के साथ- साथ होती हुई बिन्दु ख पर पहुंचती है उसके बाद रेखा प्लाट सं. 383 के दक्षिणी सीमा, ग्राम कुसुक्षपाल के बिन्दु " ग" पर मिलती है प्लाट सं 434 की, उत्तरी पूर्वी एवं दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ - साथ गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है उसके बाद धुरूडिआनाला के पूर्वी किनारे के साथ - साथ बिन्दु " घ " तक गुजरती है जो ग्राम भालुगाडिआ, गोपालप्रसाद और नुहुआमुहीन संरक्षित वन त्रयीमिलन स्तम्भ है।

घड़ च रेखा बिन्दु घ " से प्रारंभ होती है निसा संरक्षित वन के पूर्वी सीमा के साथ - साथ बिन्दु " ड़" तक गुजरती है उसके बाद निसा संरक्षित वन की पश्चिम एवं दक्षिणी सीमा की तरफ मुड़ती है और निसा संरक्षित वन से होकर गुजरती है । [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6753

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

च छ ज - रेखा बिन्दु ' च' से प्रारंभ्भ होती है, प्लाट सं . 272,39,38 की दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ- साथ प्लाट सं . 285,45, 46,47 से होकर जाती है और प्लाट सं . 51 , 271 , 53 , 75 , 77, 78, 311 से होकर गुजरती है और प्लाट सं. 306 की दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ- साथ गुजरती है और फिर बिन्दु छ' तक ग्राम बालीचंदरपुर के प्लाट सं. 329 से होक गुजरती है एवं उसके बाद रेखा ग्राम कनकेरी के प्लाट सं . 2194, 2196, 1870 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' ज' पर मिलती है ।

ज - झ ञ - रेखा बिन्दु ' ज" से प्लाट सं. 1870, 2173, 2181 से होकर उत्तर की ओर मुड़ती है और पश्चिम की ओर मुड़ती है और प्लाट सं. 1870 से होकर दोबारा गुजरती है और प्लाट सं . 1874 की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ- साथ गुजरती है फिर प्लाटं सं. 1877, 1876, 1848, 1849 से गुजरती है उसके बाद प्लाट सं. 1837 एवं 1836 के पश्चिम सीमा के साथ- साथ होती हुई दोबारा प्लाट सं . 1831 , 1739, 1740, 1747, 1746, 1748, 1727, 1726, 1692, 1690, 1689 , 1686 से गुजरती है और फिर सड़क के प्लाट सं . 1785 को पार करती है उसके बाद प्लाट सं . 1760 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ - साथ गुजरती है, ग्राम कनकेरी के प्लाट सं . 740 , 739, 938, 735 से होकर गुजरती है और धरूडियानाला को पार करती है और बिन्दु झ" पर मिलती है उसके बाद रेखा ग्राम कौसिधिया के प्लाट सं . 807, 808 , 809 , 800 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " त्र" पर मिलती है जो ग्रांम कौसिधिया और छोटाबेरिनी का सांझा सम्मिलित सीमा है ।

अट रेखा बिन्दु " अ " से प्रारंभ होती है, ग्राम छोटाबेरिनी के प्लाट सं . 204, 205 , 206, 209, 210 , 213 , 193, 192, 187, 184 , 171 , 150, 132 , 137, 138, 140, 141 , 87 , 338, 85 , 84 से होकर गुजरती है और सिंगडा जोरा अर्थात प्लाट सं . 312 को पार करती है और बिन्दु " ट" पर मिलती है अर्थात ग्राम छोटाबेरिनी एवं जैपुर संरक्षित वन का सम्मिलित सीमा ।

ट - ठ - रेखा बिन्दु " ट" से जैपुर सरंक्षित वन से होकर बिन्दु ठ" तक जाती है अर्थात ग्राम केनकेरी , कुमुंदा और जैपुर सरंक्षित वन का त्रयीमिलन स्तम्भ।

ठ - क - रेखा बिन्दु " ठ" से ग्राम कुमुंदा के प्लाट सं . 972 की पश्चिमी और उत्तरी सीमा ग्राम कुमुंदा के प्लाट सं . 973 , 974, 967 , 963 , 650 , 958 , 652, 656, 952, 951 , 950, 993, 995 के साथ- साथ गुजरती है और सिंगडा जोरा अर्थात प्लाट सं. 1404 के उत्तरी किनारे के साथ साथ गुजरती है और दोबारा सिंगडा जोरा को पार करती है और सिंगडा जोरा के दक्षिणी किनारे अर्थात प्लाट सं . 2589 के साथ- साथ जाती है और बिन्दु " क " अर्थात प्रारम्भिक बिन्दु पर मिलती है।

[फा. सं. -43015/6/2003- पी. आर. आई. डब्ल्यू..] 3050 G1 /04-6A

गार्गी मुखर्जी, निदेशक 6754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 15th October , 2004

S. O. 2671.- Whereas by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal , S.O. Number 1979 dated 30th June 2003 Under sub - section (i ) ofsection -4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) hereinafter referred to as the said Act, published in part - It, section - 3 , sub- section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India dated 19th July 2003 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 4695.52 acres (approximately ) or 1900.25 hectares ( approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification.

And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a partof the said land;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section - 7 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 2527.46 acres ( approximately ) or 1022.849 hectares (approximately) in all right as described in the Schedule appended hereto .

1. The Plan bearing NO . MCL/ SAMB / GM ( CP & P ) / GOPALPRASAD ( W) / 04 / 28 dated 28.04.04 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector, Angul , ( Orissa ) or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkota , or in the office of the Mahanadi Coalfields Limited (Corporate Planning & Project Deptt . ) . Jagriti Vihar , P.O Jagriti Vihar , Burla , District Sambalpur ( Orissa ).

2. Attention is hereby invited to the provisions af section 8 of the said Act , which provide as follows: -

Objection to acquisition

8( i ) - Any person interested in land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued, may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification , objectto the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any rights in or over such land.

Explanation

(1) It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.

3050 G1 /04-6B [ भाग II-- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

(2) Every objection under sub section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing , and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary , either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land , or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government , containing his recommendations on the objections together with the record of the proceedings held by him , for the decision of that Government .

(3) For the purpose of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act.

Schedule

Gopalprasad (West ) Block

Talcher Coalfield ( Hingula Area)

District : Angul ( Orissa)

ALL RIGHTS

(Plan No. MCL / SAMB / GM ( CP & P ) / GOPALPRASAD ( W) /04/ 28 dated . 28.4.2004)

Village

Police Station & No SL. No.

Remarks

Area in acres

Distric t/State

Tahsil / Sub Div.

Part

225.990

Chhendipada

Jarapada - 67 Balichandrapur

Pirakhaman

Angul / Orissa

Full

246.150

Chhendipada |

Jarapada -66 Chhotaberini

Angul / Orissa

Part

173.780

Chhendipada

Jarapada -64 Kankarei

Angul/ Orissa

733.670

Part

Chhendipada

Jarapada -65 5 Kaunsidhip

Angul / Orissa

8.930 Part Chhendipada

Jarapada -63 (1

Colliery -01 Bhalugadia

7 Baghua-bol

Colliery -02 S

Kaniha 119 Kumunda

Kusumapal

Colliery -03 10

Chhendupada Jaypur Protected

Forest

Jarapada Forest Nisa Protected

Angul / Orissa

Part

653.290

Talcher Angul/ Orissa

40.730 Full Talcher Angul/ Orissa

Part

63.500

Angul Angul/ Orissa

Part

20.320

Angul Angul/ Orissa

Part

5.000

Talcher Angul/ Orissa

Part

356.100

Talcher Angul/ Orissa

Total 2527.460 acres ( approximately ) or 1022.849 hectares ( approximately ) 6756

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1.PLOTS NOS . TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE BALICHANDRAPUR ( PART)

1 , 2 , 3 , 4, 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14, 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34, 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43 , 44 , 45 ( P ) , 46 ( P) , 47 ( P ) , 51 ( P) , 52, 53 ( P ) , 75 (P ) , 76 , 77 ( P ) , 78 (P ) , 76/269 , 36/271 ( P) , 39/272 ( P) , 46/273 , 46/274 , 35/284 , 26/288 , 36/291 , 33/292 , 15/297 , 177/306 , 177/311 ( P ) & 177/329 (P) .

2 PLOTS NOS TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE PIRAKHAMAN ( FULL )

3 PLOT NOS . TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE CHHOTOBERINI ( PART)

84( P), 85 , 87 ( P ) , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94 , 95, 96, 97, 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112, 113 , 114 , 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132(P) , 137 ( P) , 138( P) , 140( P) , 141 ( P) , 150 ( P ) , 171 ( P), 172 , 173 , 174, 175 , 176, 177 , 178, 179 , 180 , 181 , 182, 183 , 184( P) , 187 ( P) , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192( P ) , 193 ( P ), 204( P) , 205( P) , 206( P ), 207 , 208 , 209( P ) , 210 ( P ) , 213 ( P) , 214, 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222, 223 , 224, 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234, 235 , 236, 237 , 238 , 239, 240 , 241 , 242, 243 , 244, 245 , 246 , 247 , 248, 249, 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254, 255 , 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262, 263, 264, 265 , 266, 267 , 268 , 269 , 270, 271 , 272, 273 , 274, 275 , 276 , 277, 278 , 279, 280, 281 , 282, 283 , 284, 285, 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297 , 298 , 299, 300 , 301 , 302, 303 , 304, 305 , 306 , 271/311 , 84/312, 88/323 , 204/325 , 229/334, 229/335, 297/336, 296/337 , 85/338 ( P) , 270/339 , 92/341 , 243/345, 243/346, 234/347,272/ 348 , 285/349, 278/350 , 278/351 , 109/352 , 91/353, 249/355, 249/356 , 100/357 , 221/359 , 97/363 , 251/365 , 234/366, 296/367 , 222/368 , 223/369 & 268/370 .

4 PLOTS NOS . TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE KANKAREI ( PART )

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

109 , 110, 111 , 112 , 113 , 114, 115, 116, 117 , 118, 119, 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125 , 126, 127 , 128, 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143 , 144, 145, 146, 147 , 148 , 149, 150, 151 , 152 , 153 , 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161 , 162, 163 , 164 , 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183,184, 185, 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190, 191, 192, 193 , 194, 195 , 196 , 197, 198, 199 , 200 , 201 , 202, 203 , 204, 205 , 206, 207, 208, 209, 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216, 217 , 218 , 219, 220, 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226, 227 , 228 , 229, 230, 231 , 232, 233 , 234, 235, 236, 237 , 238 , 239 , 240, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244, 245 , 246 , 247, 248, 249, 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254, 255 , 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262, 263 , 264, 265, 266, 267 , 268 , 269, 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274, 275 , 276, 277 , 278 , 279 , 280, 281 , 282 , 283 , 284, 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290, 291 , 292 , 293 , 294, 295 , 296, 297 , 298 , 299, 300, 301 , 302 , 303 , 304, 305, 306 , 307 , 308 , 309, 310, 311 , 312, 313 , 314, 315 , 316, 317, 318, 319 , 320, 321 , 322 , 323 , 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331 , 332, 333 , 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345 , 346, 347, 348 , 349, 350, 351 , 352, 353, 354, 355, 356 , 357, 358 , 359, 360, 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365, 366 , 367 , 368, 369, 370 , 371 , 372, 373 , 374, 375, 376, 377, 378 , 379 , 380, 381 , 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394, 395, 396 , 397, 398 , 399, 400 , 401 , 402, 403 , 404, 405, 406 , 407, 408, 409 , 410 , 411 , 412 , 413 , 414 , 415, 416 , 417, 418, 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423 , 424, 425, 426, 427 , 428, 429, 430 , 431 , 432, 433 , 434, 435 , 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441 , 442, 443 , 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451 , 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459 , 460, 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469, 470 , 471 , 472, 473 , 474, 475, 476 , 47178, 479 , 480 , 481 , 482, 483 , 484 , 485 , 486, 487 , 488, 489, 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 494 , 495 , 496, 497, 498 , 499 , 500, 501 , 502, 503 , 504, 505 , 506, 507, 508, 509, 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514, 515 , 516 , 517, 518 , 519, 520, 521 , 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527 , 528 , 529, 530 , 531 , 532, 533 , 534, 535 , 536 , 537, 538 , 539, 540, 541 , 542 , 543, 544, 545, 546, 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552, 553 , 554 , 555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561 , 562, 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569, 570, 571 , 572, 573 , 574 , 575, 576, 577 , 578, 579 , 580, 581 , 582, 583, 584, 585 , 586 , 587 , 588, 589, 590 , 591 , 592, 593 , 594 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598, 599, 600 , 601 , 602 , 603,604, 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 , 609, 610, 611 , 612 , 613 , 614, 615 , 616 , 617, 618 , 619, 620 , 621 , 622, 623 , 624, 625, 626 , 627 , 628 , 629, 630, 631 , 632 , 633 , 634, 635, 636, 637, 638 , 639, 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644, 645, 646, 647, 648 , 649, 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667, 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677, 678 , 679, 680 , 681 , 682, 683 , 684, 685, 686 , 687 , 688 , 689, 690, 691 , 692 , 693 , 694, 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700, 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708, 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720, 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725, 726, 727 , 728(P) , 735 ( P) , 738 ( P) , 739( P) , 740( P) , 741 , 742 , 743 , 744, 745, 746, 747( P) , 748 (P) , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752 , 753, 754, 755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770 , 771 , 772 , 773, 774, 775 , 776 , 777 , 778 , 779, 780 , 781 , 782, 783 , 784, 785 , 786, 787 , 788, 789 , 790 , 791 , 792 .

793 , 794 , 795 , 796, 797 , 798,799 , 800 , 801 , 802 , 803, 804, 805, 806 , 807, 808, 809, 810, 811 , 812, 813, 814 , 815 , 816, 817 , 818, 819, 820, 821 , 822, 823, 824, 825, 826, 827,828 , 829, 830, 831 , 832 , 833, 834, 835, 836 , 837 , 838, 839 , 840, 841 , 842 , 843 , 844, 845 , 846 , 847 , 848 , 849 , 850 , 851,852 , 6758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 853, 54, 55, 856 , 157 , 858 , 859 , 860 , 861 , 862 , 863 , 864 , 865 , 866, 867 , 868 , 869, 870 , 871 , 872 , 373, 874 , 875, 876, 877, 878 , 879,880, 881 , 882 , 883 , 884, 885 , 886 , 887 , 888 , 889, 890, 891 , 892 , 893 , 894, 895, 896, 897 , 898 , 899, 900 , 901 , 902, 903 , 904, 905, 906 , 907 , 908 , 909, 910, 911 , 912, 913 , 914 , 915 , 916 , 917 , 918 , 919 , 920 , 921 , 922 , 923 , 924, 925, 926 , 927 , 928, 929, 930, 931 , 932 , 953 , 954 , 955 , 956 , 957 , 958 , 959 , 960 , 961 , 962 , 963 , 964 , 965, 966, 967 , 968, 969, 970 , 971 , 972 , 973, 974 , 975 , 976 , 977 , 978 , 979 , 980 , 981 , 982, 983 , 984, 985 , 986, 987, 988 , 989 , 990, 991 , 992 , 1042, 1043 , 1044 , 1045,1046, 1047 , 1048, 1049 , 1050 , 1051 , 1052, 1053 , 1054, 1055 , 1056, 1057, 1058 , 1059, 1060 , 1061 , 1062 , 1063 , 1064, 1065, 1066 , 1067, 1068 , 1069 , 1070, 1071 , 1072 , 1073 , 1074 , 1075 , 1076 , 1077 , 1078 , 1079 , 1080 , 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084, 1085, 1086, 1087 , 1088 , 1089 , 1006 1107, 1108 , 1109, 1110, 1111 , 1112 , 11:13 , 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1118 , 1119 , 1120 , 1121 , 1122 , 1123 , 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128 , 1129, 1130, 1131 , 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135, 1136 , 1137, 1138 , 1139 , 1140, 1141 , 1142 , 1143 , 114 , 1145, 1146 , 1147 , 1148 , 1149, 1150 , 1151 , 1152 , 1153 , 1154 , 1155 , 1156 , 1157 , 1158 , 1159 , 1160 , 1161 , 1162 , 1163 , 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167 , 1168 , 1169, 1170, 1171 , 1172 , 1173 , 1174 , 1175, 1176 , 1177 , 1178 , 179, 1180, 1181 , 1182, 1183 , 1184 , 1185 , 1186,1187 , 1188 , 1189, 1199 , 1191 , 1192 , 1193 , 1194, 1195 , 1196, 1197, 1198, 1199, 1200 , 1201 , 1218, 1219 , 1220 , 1221 , 1222 , 1223 , 1224 , 1225 , 1226, 1227 , 1228 , 1229, 1230 , 1231 , 1232 , 1233 , 1234, 1235 , 1236 , 1237 , 1238, 1239 , 1240, 1241 , 1242,1243, 1244, 1245 , 1246, 1247 , 1248 , 1249 , 1250 , 1251 , 1252 , 1253 , 1254 , 1255 , 1256 , 1257 , 1258, 1259 , 1260 , 1261 , 1262, 1263 , 1264 , 1265 , 1282, 1283 , 1284 , 1285 , 1286 , 1287 , 1288 , 1289 , 1290 , 1291 , 1292 , 1293 , 1294, 1295 , 1296 , 1297 , 1298, 1299 , 1300 , 1301 , 1302 , 1303 , 1304 , 1305 , 1306, 1307 , 1308 , 1309, 1310, 1311 , 1312, 1313 , 1336. 1331, 1332, 1333, 1334, 1335, 1336, 1337, 1338, 1339, 1340 , 1341 , 1342 , 1343 , 1344, 1345, 1346, 1347, 1348 , 1349 , 1350 , 1351 , 1352, 1353 , 1354, 1355 , 1356, 1357, 1358 , 1359, 1360, 1361 , 1410, 1411 , 1412, 1413 , 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417 , 1418, 1419, 1420 , 1421 , 1422 , 1423 , 1424, 1425, 1426, 1427 , 1428 , 1429 , 1430, 1431 , 1432, 1433 , 1434 , 1435 , 1436, 1437 , 1438 , 1439, 1440, 1441 , 1442, 1443 , 1444, 1445, 1446, 1447 , 1448 , 1449 , 1450, 1451 , 1452 , 1453 , 1454, 1455, 1456, 1457, 933 , 934 , 935, 936, 937, 938, 939 , 940 , 941 , 942 943,944 , 945, 946, 947 , 948 , 949, 950 , 951 , 952 , 93 , 994, 995, 996 , 997, 998, 999 , 1000 , 1001 , 1002 , 1003 , 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008 , 1009, 1010 , 1011 , 1012 , 1013 , 1014, 1015 , 1016, 1017, 1018 , 1019, 1020, 1021 , 1022, 1023 , 1024 , 1025, 1026 , 1027 , 1028 , 1029 , 1030, 1031 , 1032 , 1033, 1034 , 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038 , 1039, 1040 , 1041 , 1090, 1091 , 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097 , 1098, 1099, 1100, 1101 , 1102 , 1103, 1104, 1105, 1202, 1203 , 1204 , 1205 , 1206 , 1207 , 1208 , 1209 , 1210 , 1211 , 1212 , 1213 , 1214 , 1215 , 1216 , 1217 , 1266 , 1267, 1268 , 1269 , 1270 , 1271 , 1272 , 1273 , 1274 , 1275 , 1276 , 1277 , 1278 , 1279 , 1280 , 1281 , 1314, 1313, 1316 , 1317, 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321 , 1322 , 1323 , 1324, 1325, 1326, 1327 , 1328, 1329, 1562, 1363 , 1364 , 1365 , 1366, 1367 , 1368 , 1369 , 1370, 1371 , 1372 , 1373 , 1374, 1375 , 1376 , 1377 , 1378 , 1379 , 1380 , 1381 , 1382 , 1383 , 1384, 1385, 1386 , 1387 , 1388 , 1389 , 1390, 1391 , 1392 , 1393 , 1394, 1395, 1396 , 1397, 1398, 1399 , 1400, 1401 , 1402 , 1403 , 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407 , 1408 , 1409, 1458, 1459 , 1460 , 1461 , 1462 , 1463 , 1464, 1465, 1466, 1467, 1468 , 1469, 1470, 1471 , 1472, 1473, 6759 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1474,1475.1476 , 1477 , 1478 , 1479 , 1480 , 1481 , 1482, 1483 , 1484, 1485, 1486, 1487, 1488, 1489 , 1490, 1491, 1492 , 1493 , 1494 , 1495, 1496 , 1497 , 1498 , 1499 , 1500 , 1501 , 1502, 1503, 1504, 1505, 1506, 1507 , 1508 , 1509 , 1510 , 1511 , 1512, 1513. 1514, 1515, 1516, 1517, 1518 , 1519 , 1520, 1521 , 1522 , 1523 , 1524 , 1525, 1526 , 1527 , 1528 , 1529 , 1530 , 1531 , 1532 , 1533, 1534 , 1535, 1536 , 1537, 1538 , 1539 , 1540. 1541 , 1542, 1543 , 1544, 1545, 1546, 1547 , 1548, 1549, 1550 , 1551 , 1552, 1553 , 1554, 1555, 1556 , 1557,1558 , 1559 , 1560 , 1561 , 1562 , 1563 , 1564, 1565 , 1566 , 1567 , 1568 , 1569 , 1570 , 1571 , 1572. 1573 , 1574 , 1575 , 1576 , 1577 , 1578 , 1579 , 1580 , 1581 , 1582 , 1583 , 1584 , 1585, 1586 , 1587 , 1588 , 1589 , 1590 , 1591 , 1592. 1593 , 1594, 1595, 1596 , 1597 , 1598, 1599, 1600, 1601 , 1602 , 1603 , 1604, 1605, 1606, 1607 , 1608, 1609, 1610 , 1611 , 1612 , 1613 , 1614 , 1615 , 1616 , 1617, 1618, 1619 , 1620. 1621. 1622 , 1623 , 1624 , 1625 , 1626 , 1627 , 1628 , 1629 , 1630, 1631 , 1632, 1633, 1634.1635, 1636 , 1637 , 1638 , 1639 , 1640 , 1641 , 1642 , 1643 , 1644, 1645 , 1646, 1647, 1648 , 1649 , 1650, 1651,1652 , 1653 , 1654 , 1655 , 1656 , 1657 , 1658 , 1659 , 1660 , 1661 , 1662 , 1663 , 1664 , 1665, 1666. 1667,1668 . 1669, 1670 , 1671 , 1672, 1673 , 1674 , 1675 , 1676 , 1677 , 1678 , 1679 , 1680 , 1681 , 1682 , 1683 , 1684, 1685. 1686 ( P ) . 1689 ( P) , 1690( P) , 1692 ( P ) , 1726 ( P ) , 1727 ( P ), 1728 , 1729 , 1730, 1731 , 1732 , 1733 , 1734 , 1735, 1736 , 1737, 1738 , 1739( P) , 1740( P), 1743 , 1744, 1745, 1746 ( P) . 1747 ( P) , 1748( P ) . 1760 (P ) , 1829 , 1830 , 1831 (P) , 1837 (P) , 1848 ( P) , 1849(P) , 1850 , 1851 , 1852. 1853 , 1854 , 1855, 1856 , 1857 , 1858 , 1859 , 1860 , 1861 , 1862 , 1863, 1864, 1865, 1866 , 1867, 1868. 1869 , 1870 ( P ) , 1871 , 1872 , 1873 , 1874,1875 , 1876 ( P) , 1877 ( P ) , 26/1942 , 83/1943 , 595/1944, 607/1945, 607/1946 , 850/1947 , 1031/1948 , 1024/1949 , 757/1950 , 1524/1951 , 598/1952 , 946/1953 , 334/1954, 83/1955 , 1417/1957, 465/ 1958,1521 / 1959 , 295/1963 , 1674/1964, 1674/1965, 1673/1966 , 1676/1971 , 89/1972.495 / 1973、774/ 1974 , 60/1976 , 60/1977 , 62/1978 , 624/1979 , 783/1980 , 685/1981 , 63/1982, 94/1983, 1866/1990, 38/1993 , 61/1994, 1384/1996 , 1680/2001 , 221/2003 , 1246/2004, 83/2005 , 60/2006,1417 / 2007 . 780/2008 , 498/2009 , 241/2010 , 1392/2011 , 246/ 2012、1105/2016 , 778/2017 , 1865/2018 . 330/2019 , 334/2020, 543/2022 , 552/ 2023,500/2024 , 199/2025, 557/2026 . 1870/2173 ( 1 ), 1870/2176 , 1870/2177 , 1870/2178 , 1870/2179 , 1870/2180 , 1870/2181 ( P) , 1870/2182 , 1870/2183,1870/2184 , 1870/2194 ( P ) , 1870/2195 & 1870/2196( P) .

5- PLOTS NOS . TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE KAUNSIDHIPA ( PART )

800 ( P ) , 801 , 802 , 803 , 804, 805 , 806 ( P ) , 807 ( P) , 808( P ), & 809 (P ) .

6- PLOTS NOS . TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE BHALUGADIA ( PART)

1 , 2 , 3 , 4, 5 , 6 , 7, 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14, 15 , 16 , 17, 18, 19 , 20, 21. 22, 23 , 24, 25, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30, 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42 , 43, 44, 45, 46 , 47 , 48, 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54, 55, 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64, 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75, 76 , 77 , 78 , 79, 80, 81 , 82, 83, 84, 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104, 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109, 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125 , 126, 127, 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135, 136, 137 , 138 , 139, 140, 141, 142 , 143 , 144, 145, 146, 147, 148 , 6760

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

149, 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158, 159 , 160, 161 , 162 , 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168 , 169 , 170, 171 , 172, 173 , 174, 175, 176 , 177, 178, 179, 180, 181 , 182, 183,184, 185, 186, 187 , 188, 189, 190 , 191 , 192 , 193, 194, 195, 196, 197 , 198, 199, 200, 201 , 202 , 203 , 204, 205 , 206, 207 , 208, 209, 210, 211 , 212 , 213 , 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221 , 222 , 223 , 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234, 235, 236, 237 , 238, 239 , 240 , 241 , 242, 243 , 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251 , 252, 253 , 254, 255 , 256, 257, 258, 259 , 260 , 261 , 262, 263, 264 , 265, 266 , 267, 268, 269 , 270 , 271 , 272, 273 , 274 , 275, 276, 277 , 278, 279, 280, 281 , 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289 , 290 , 291 , 292, 293 , 294, 295, 296, 297, 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302, 303 , 304, 305, 306 , 307, 308, 309 , 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321 , 322 , 323, 324, 325, 326, 327 , 328, 329, 330 , 331 , 332 , 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341 , 342 , 343, 344 , 345 , 346, 347, 348, 349, 350 , 351 , 352, 353 , 354, 355, 356, 357 , 358 , 359, 360, 361 , 362, 363 , 364 , 365, 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374, 375 , 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381 , 382, 383 , 384, 385, 386, 387 , 388 , 389 , 390, 391 , 392 , 393 , 394, 395, 396 , 397 , 398 , 399, 400, 401 , 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407 , 408 , 409, 40, 411 , 412, 413 , 414, 415, 416, 417 , 418, 419, 420, 421 , 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427 , 428, 429, 430 , 431 , 432, 433 , 434, 435 , 436 , 437, 438, 439, 440 , 441 , 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447 , 448, 449, 450, 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455, 456, 457, 458 , 459 , 460, 461 , 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467 , 468, 469, 470, 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 477, 478, 479 , 480, 481 , 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487 , 488 , 489, 490, 491 , 492 , 493 , 494 , 495 , 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502, 503 , 504, 505, 506, 507 , 508 , 509 , 510, 511 , 512, 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517, 518 , 519, 520 , 521 , 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528 , 529, 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540, 541 , 542, 543 , 544, 545, 546, 547, 548 , 549, 550, 551 , 552, 553, 554, 555 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 550 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564, 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572, 573 , 574, 575, 576, 577, 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583, 584, 585, 586, 587 , 588 , 589 , 590, 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596, 597 , 598 , 599, 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604, 605, 606 , 607 , 608, 609, 610, 611 , 612 , 613 , 614 , 615 , 616, 617 , 618, 619, 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624, 625, 626 , 627 , 628, 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 636 , 637, 638 , 639, 640, 641 , 642 , 643 , 644, 645, 646, 647 , 648 , 649, 650, 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657, 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664, 665 , 666, 667, 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677, 678, 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684, 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690, 691 , 692 , 693 , 694, 695, 696 , 697, 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702, 703 , 704 , 705, 706, 707 , 708, 709, 710, 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717 , 718, 719 , 720, 721 , 722 , 723, 724, 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729, 730, 731 , 732 , 733 , 734, 735, 736, 737 , 738 , 739, 740, 741 , 742 , 743, 744, 745, 746 , 747 , 748 , 749, 750 , 751 , 752 , 753 , 754, 755, 756 , 757 , 758 , 759, 760, 761 , 762, 763 , 764 , 765, 766, 767 , 768 , 769, 770 , 771 , 772, 773 , 774, 775 , 776 , 777 , 778 , 779, 780 , 781 , 782 , 783 , 784, 785, 786 , 787 , 788 , 789,790 , 791 , 792 , 793 , 794 , 795 , 796 , 797 , 798,799, 800, 801 , 802, 803, 804, 805 , 806 , 807, 808, 809, 810 , 811 , 812 , 813 , 814 , 815, 816 , 817 , 818, 819, 820, 821 , 822, 823, 824, 825 , 826 , 827,828 , 829, 830 , 831 , 832 , 833, 834, 835, 836 , 837, 838 , 839, 840, 841 , 842 , 843 , 844, 845 , 846, 847, 848, 849, 850 , 851 , 852 , 853 , 854, 855, 856, 857, 858 , 859, 860, 861 , 862 , 863, 864 , 865 , 866 , 867, 868 , 869 , 870 , 871 , 872, 873 , 874 , 875, 876 , 877 , 878 , 879, 880, 881 , 882 , 883 , 884, 885, 886 , 887, 888, 6761 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

889, 80, 891, 892 , 893 , 894, 895, 896 , 897, 898, 899 , 900901 902 903 904 905 906 907 , 908 , 909 , 910 , 911 , 912 , 913 , 914, 915, 916, 917, 918 , 919 , 920 , 921 , 922 , 923 , 924 , 925, 926, 927 , 928 , 929, 930 , 931 , 932 , 933 , 934, 935 , 936 , 937 , 938, 939, 940, 941 , 942 943,944, 945, 946, 947, 948 , 949 , 950 , 951 , 952 , 953 , 954 , 955 , 956 , 957, 958 , 959 , 960, 961 , 962, 963 , 964, 965 , 966 , 967 , 968 , 969 , 970 , 971 , 972 , 973 , 974, 975, 976, 977, 978, 979, 980, 981 , 982, 983, 984, 985, 986 , 987, 988, 989, 990 , 991 , 992 , 993 , 994 , 995 , 996 , 997, 998 , 999, 1000, 1001 , 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007 , 1008 , 1009 , 1010, 1011 , 1012, 1013 , 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018 , 1019 , 1020, 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024, 1025 , 1026 , 1027, 1028 , 1029 , 1030 , 1031 , 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038 , 1039 , 1040 , 1041 , 1042 , 1043 , 1044, 1045, 1046 , 1047 , 1048 , 1049, 1050, 1051 , 1052, 1053 , 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057 , 1058 , 1059, 1060 , 1061 , 1062 , 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067, 1068 , 1069 , 1070 , 1071 , 1072 , 1073 , 1074, 1075, 1076 , 1077 , 1078 , 1079, 1080, 1081 , 1082, 1083 , 1084, 1085, 1086 , 1087 , 1088 , 1089, 1090, 1091 , 1092 , 1093 , 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097 , 1098 , 1099, 1100, 1101, 1102 , 1103 , 1104, 1105, 1106 , 1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111 , 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1118 , 1119, 1120, 1121 , 1122 , 1123 , 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127 , 1128 , 1129 , 1130, 1131 , 1132 , 1133, 1134 , 1135, 1136 , 1137 , 1138 , 1139 , 1140 , 1141 , 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146, 1147 , 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151 , 1152, 1153 , 1154, 1155, 1156, 1157, 1158, 1159, 1160, 1161 , 1162, 1163 , 1164, 1165, 1166 , 1167 , 1168 , 1169, 1170, 1171 , 1172, 1173, 1174, 1175 , 1176, 1177, 1178 , 1179, 1180, 1181 , 1182 , 1183 , 1184 , 1185, 1186, 1187, 1188 , 1189, 1190, 1191 , 1192, 1193 , 1194, 1195 , 1196, 1197, 1198 , 1199, 1200, 1201 , 1202, 1203 , 1204, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208 , 1209 , 1210, 1211 , 1212, 1213 , 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217 , 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221 , 1222, 1223 , 1224 , 1225, 1226, 1227 , 1228 , 1229 , 1230 , 1231 , 1232 , 1233, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1237, 1238, 1239, 1240, 1241 , 1242 , 1243, 1244, 1245, 1246, 1247, 1248, 1249, 1250 , 1251 , 1252 , 1253, 1254, 1255, 1256, 1257, 1258, 1259, 1260 , 1261 , 1262 , 1263 , 1264, 1265,1266, 1267, 1268 , 1269, 1270, 1271 , 1272 , 1273 , 1274, 1275, 1276, 1277, 1278 , 1279 , 1280, 1281 , 1282 , 1283 , 1284, 1285, 1286 , 1287, 1288, 1289, 1290 , 1291 , 1292, 1293 , 1294 , 1295 , 1296 , 1297 , 1298 , 1299 , 1300 , 1301 , 1302, 1303, 1304, 1305, 1306, 1307, 1308, 1309, 1310 , 1311 , 1312 , 1313 , 1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321 , 1322 , 1323, 1324, 1325, 1326, 1327 , 1328, 1329 , 1330, 1331 , 1332, 1333, 1334, 1335, 1336, 1337, 1338, 1339 , 1340, 1341 , 1342 , 1343 , 1344, 1345 , 1346 , 1347 , 1348 , 1349 , 1350, 1351 , 1352, 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356, 1357, 1358, 1359, 1360, 1361 , 1362 , 1363 , 1364 , 1365, 1366, 1367 , 1368, 1369 , 1370, 1371, 1372, 1373, 1374, 1375 , 1376 , 1377 , 1378 , 1379 , 1380, 1381 , 1382, 1383 , 1384, 1385, 1386, 1387, 1388 , 1389, 1390, 1391 , 1392 , 1393 , 1394, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398 , 1399, 1400, 1401 , 1402 , 1403 , 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407 , 1408 , 1409 , 1410, 1411 , 1412, 1413, 1414, 1415 , 1416, 1417, 1418, 1419, 1420, 1421 , 1422, 1423 , 1424, 1425, 1426, 1427, 1428 , 1429, 1430, 1431 , 1432, 1433, 1434, 1435, 1436, 1437, 1438, 1439, 1440 , 1441 , 1442 , 1443 , 1444, 1445, 1446, 1447, 1448, 1449, 1450, 1451, 1452, 1453, 1454, 1455, 1456 , 1457 , 1458, 1459, 1460 , 1461 , 1462 , 1463 , 1464, 1465, 1466, 1467, 1468, 1469, 1470, 1471 , 1472 , 1473, 1474, 1475, 1476, 1477, 1478 , 1479 , 1480, 1481 , 1482, 1483 , 1484, 1485, 1486, 1487, 1488, 1489, 1490, 1491 , 1492, 1493 , 1494, 1495, 1496, 1497, 1498, 1499, 1500, 1501 , 1502, 0762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC , 3 ( ii ) ] 1695, 1696, 1697 , 1698 , 1699 , 1700, 1701 , 1702 , 1703 , 1704 , 1705, 1706, 1707, 1708 , 1709, 1710, 1775 , 1776 , 1777 , 1778 , 1779 , 1780, 1781 , 1782 , 1783 , 1784, 1785 , 1786 , 1787 , 1788 , 1789 , 1790 , 1807 , 1808 , 1809, 1810, 1811 , 1812, 1813 , 1814, 1815 , 1816 , 1817 , 1818, 1819 , 1820 , 1821 , 1822 , 1823 , 1824, 1825 , 1826, 1827 , 1828 , 1829 , 1830 , 1831 , 1832, 1833, 1834, 1835 , 1836, 1837 , 1838 , 1839, 1840 , 1841 , 1842 , 1843 , 1844, 1845, 1846 , 1847 , 1848 , 1849 , 1850 , 1851 , 1852, 1853 , 1854, 1855, 1856 , 1857 , 1858 , 1859 , 1860 , 1861 , 1862 , 1863 , 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867 , 1868 , 1869, 1870 , 1871 , 1872 , 1873 , 1874 , 1875, 1876, 1877 , 1878 , 1879 , 1880, 1881 , 1882, 1883 , 1884 , 1885 , 1886 , 1887, 1888 , 1889 , 1890 , 1891 , 1892, 1893, 1894, 1895, 1896, 1897 , 1898 , 1899, 1900 , 1901 , 1902 , 1903 , 1904, 1905 , 1906, 1907 , 1908 , 1909 , 1910, 1911 , 1912, 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917 , 1918 , 1919 , 1920 , 1921 , 1922 , 1923 , 1924, 1925, 1926 , 1927 , 1928 , 1929 , 1930, 1931 , 1932 , 1933 , 1934, 1935, 1936 , 1937 , 1938 , 1939, 1940, 1941 , 1942, 1943 , 1944 , 1945 , 1946 , 1947, 1948 , 1949 , 1950 , 1951 , 1952 , 1953 , 1954, 1955 , 1956 , 1957, 1958 , 1959 , 1960 , 1961 , 1962 , 1963 , 1964, 1965 , 1966 , 1967 , 1968 , 1969, 1970 , 1971 , 1972 , 1973 , 1974 , 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978 , 1979 , 1980 , 1981 , 1982 , 1503 , 1504 , 1505 , 1506 , 1507, 1508 , 1509, 1510 , 1511 , 1512 , 1513 , 1514 , 1515, 1516, 1517 , 1518 , 1519, 1520 , 1521 , 1522 , 1523 , 1524, 1525 , 1526, 1527 , 1528 , 1529, 1530, 1531 , 1532 , 1533 , 1534 , 1535, 1536 , 1537 , 1538 , 1539, 1540 , 1541 , 1542 , 1543 , 1544 , 1545 , 1546 , 1547, 1548 , 1549 , 1550 , 1551 , 1552, 1553 , 1554 , 1555, 1556, 1557 , 1558 , 1559 , 1560 , 1561 , 1562 , 1563 , 1564 , 1565 , 1566 , 1567, 1568 , 1569 , 1570 , 1571 , 1572 , 1573 , 1574, 1575 , 1576 , 1577 , 1578 , 1579 , 1580, 1581 , 1582 , 1583 , 1584 , 1585 , 1586 , 1587 , 1588 , 1589, 1590 , 1591 , 1592 , 1593 , 1594, 1595, 1596 , 1597 , 1598 , 1599, 1600 , 1601 , 1602 , 1603 , 1604, 1605, 1606 , 1607 , 1608 , 1609, 1610, 1611 , 1612, 1613 , 1614, 1615 , 1616 , 1617 , 1618 , 1619 , 1620, 1621 , 1622 , 1623, 1624 , 1625 , 1626 , 1627 , 1628 , 1629, 1630, 1631 , 1632, 1633 , 1634, 1635, 1636 , 1637 , 1638 , 1639 , 1640 , 1641 , 1642 , 1643 , 1644, 1645 , 1646, 1647, 1648 , 1649 , 1650 , 1651 , 1652, 1653 , 1654, 1655 , 1656 , 1657, 1658, 1659, 1660 , 1661 , 1662 , 1663 , 1664, 1665 , 1666, 1667, 1668 , 1669 , 1670, 1671 , 1672, 1673 , 1674 , 1675, 1676 , 1677 , 1678 , 1679, 1680, 1681 , 1682 , 1683 , 1684, 1685 , 1686 , 1687 , 1688 , 1689 , 1690 , 1691 , 1692 , 1693 , 1694 , 1711 , 1712, 1713 , 1714, 1715, 1716, 1717 , 1718, 1719 , 1720 , 1721 , 1722 , 1723 , 1724 , 1725 , 1726 , 1727 , 1728 , 1729 , 1730 , 1731 , 1732 , 1733 , 1734, 1735 , 1736, 1737 , 1738 , 1739 , 1740 , 1741 , 1742, 1743, 1744, 1745 , 1746 , 1747 , 1748 , 1749 , 1750 , 1751 , 1752, 1753 , 1754, 1755, 1756 , 1757 , 1758 , 1759 , 1760 , 1761 , 1762 , 1763 , 1764, 1765, 1766 , 1767, 1768 , 1769 , 1770 , 1771 , 1772 , 1773 , 1774 . 1791 , 1792 , 1793 , 1794 , 1795, 1796 , 1797 , 1798 , 1799 , 1800, 1801 , 1802 , 1803, 1804, 1805, 1806, 1983 , 1984, 1985 , 1986 , 1987 , 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991 , 1992 , 1993 , 1994, 1995 , 1996 , 1997 , 1998 , 1999 , 2000 , 2001 , 2002 , 2003 , 2004, 2005, 2006 , 2007 , 2008, 2009 , 2010, 2011 , 2012, 2013 , 2014 , 2015, 2016 , 2017, 2018 , 2019, 2020 , 2021 , 2022 , 2023 , 2024 , 2025 , 2026 , 2027, 2028 , 2029, 2030, 2031 , 2032 , 2033 , 2034, 2035 , 2036, 2037, 2038 , 2039 , 2040, 2041 , 2042, 2043 , 2044, 2045 , 2046 , 2047, 2048 , 2049 , 2050 , 2051 , 2052, 2053, 2054, 2055 , 2056, 2057 , 2058, 2059 , 2060 , 2061 , 2062 , 2063 , 2064 , 2065 , 2066 , 2067 , 2068 , 2069, 2070, 2071 , 2072, 2073 , 2074, 2075, 2076, 2077 , 2078 , 2079 , 2080 , 2081 , 2082 , 2083 , 2084, 2085 , 2086, 2087 , 2088 , 2089 , 2090 , 2091 , 2092, 2093 , 2094, 6763 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2349, 2382, 2383 , 2384 , 2385, 2386 , 2387, 2388, 2389 , 2390 , 2391 , 2392, 2393, 2394, 2395 , 2396, 2397 ,

2477 , 2095 , 2096 , 2097 , 2098 , 2099 , 2100 , 2101 , 2102 , 2103, 2104 , 2105 , 2106, 2107 , 2108 , 2109, 2110, 2111 , 2112 , 2113, 2114, 2115, 2116, 2117, 2118 , 2119 , 2120, 2121 , 2122 , 2123 , 2124 , 2125, 2126 , 2127, 2128 , 2129 , 2130, 2131 , 2132, 2133, 2134, 2135, 2136 , 2137, 2138 , 2139 , 2140, 2141 , 2142 , 2143, 2144, 2145, 2146 , 2147 , 2148, 2149, 2150 , 2151 , 2152, 2153 , 2154, 2155, 2156, 2157, 2158 , 2159, 2160 , 2161 , 2162 , 2163 , 2164 , 2165 , 2166 , 2167 , 2168, 2169, 2170 , 2171 , 2172 , 2173 , 2174 , 2175 , 2176, 2177 , 2178 , 2179, 2180, 2181 , 2182 , 2183 , 2184, 2185, 2186 , 2187, 2188 , 2189 , 2190,2191 , 2192 , 2193 , 2194 , 2195 , 2196 , 2197, 2198, 2199 , 2200 , 2201 , 2202 , 2203 , 2204 , 2205, 2206, 2207 , 2208 , 2209 , 2210 , 2211 , 2212 , 2213 , 2214 , 2215 , 2216 , 2217 , 2218 , 2219 , 2220 , 2221 , 2222 , 2223 , 2224 , 2225 , 2226 , 2227, 2228 , 2229 , 2230 , 2231 , 2232 , 2233, 2234, 2235 , 2236, 2237 , 2238 , 2239 , 2240, 2241 , 2242 , 2243 , 2244, 2245, 2246 , 2247 , 2248 , 2249 , 2250 , 2251 , 2252 , 2253, 2254, 2255, 2256, 2257 , 2258 , 2259 , 2260 , 2261 , 2262 , 2263 , 2264 , 2265, 2266 , 2267 , 2268 , 2269, 2270 , 2271 , 2272 , 2273 , 2274, 2275 , 2276 , 2277 , 2278 , 2279 , 2280 , 2281 , 2282 , 2283 , 2284, 2285, 2286. 2287 , 2288 , 2289 , 2290 , 2291 , 2292 , 2293, 2294, 2295 , 2296, 2297, 2298 , 2299 , 2300 , 2301 , 2302, 2.303 , 2304 , 2305 , 2306 , 2307, 2308 , 2309, 2310 , 2311 , 2312, 2313 , 2314, 2315 , 2316, 2317 , 2318 , 2319 , 2320 , 2321 , 2322 , 2323 , 2324, 2325 , 2326 , 2327 , 2328 , 2329 , 2330, 2331 , 2332, 2333, 2334 , 2335, 2336 , 2337 , 2338, 2339 , 2340 , 2341 , 2342, 2343 , 2344 , 2345 , 2346, 2347 , 2348, 2350, 2351 , 2352 , 2353 , 2354 , 2355 , 2356, 2357 , 2358 , 2359, 2360, 2361 , 2362, 2363 , 2364 , 2365, 2366 , 2367 , 2368 , 2369 , 2370 , 2371 , 2372, 2373 , 2374, 2375, 2376, 2377, 2378, 2379, 2380 , 2381 , 2398 , 2399,2400, 2401 , 2402, 2403, 2404, 2405 , 2406 , 2407 , 2408 , 2409 , 2410 , 2411 , 2412 , 2413 , 2414, 2415 , 2416 , 2417 , 2418, 2419 , 2420, 2421 , 2422, 2423, 2424, 2425, 2426, 2427, 2428, 2429 , 2430, 2431 , 2432 , 2433 , 2434, 2435 , 2436 , 2437, 2438 , 2439 , 2440, 2441 , 2442 , 2443, 2444, 2445, 2446, 2447 , 2448 , 2449 , 2450 , 2451 , 2452. 2453 , 2454, 2455, 2456, 2457 , 2458 , 2459, 2460, 2461 , 2462, 2463 , 2464 , 2465, 2466 , 2467 , 2468 , 2469 , 2470 , 2471 , 2472 , 2473 , 2474 , 2475, 2476, 2478, 2479 , 2480 , 2481 , 2482 , 2483 , 2484 , 2485 , 2486, 2487 , 2488 , 2489, 2490, 2491 , 2492, 2493, 2494 , 2495 , 2496 , 2497 , 2498 , 2499,2500 , 2501 , 2502 , 2503 , 2504, 2505, 2506 , 2507 , 2508 , 2509 , 2510 , 2511 , 2512 , 2513 , 2514 , 2515 , 2516 , 2517 , 2518 , 2519 , 2520 , 2521 , 2522, 2523 , 2524 , 2525 , 2526 , 2527 , 2528 , 2529 , 2530 , 2531 , 2532 , 2533 , 2534, 2535, 2536 , 2537 , 2538 , 2539 , 2540, 2541 , 2542, 2543 , 2544 , 2545 , 2546 , 2547, 2548 , 2549 , 2550 , 2551 , 2552 , 2553 , 2554, 2555, 2556 , 2557 , 2558 , 2559 , 2560 , 2561 , 2562 , 2563 , 2564, 2565 , 2566 , 2567 , 2568 , 2569 , 2570 , 2571 , 2572 , 2573,2574, 2575, 2576 , 2577 , 2578 , 2579,2580, 2581 , 2583, 2007/2584 , 2029/2585 , 2028/2586 , 1912/2587, 160/2588 , 291/2589 ( P) , 1788/2590, 2057/2591 , 1/2592 , 12/2593 , 22/2594 , 1550/2595 , 448/2596 , 449/2597 , 477/2598 , 125/2599 , 996/2600 , 762/2601 , 1235/2602, 564/2603 , 1450/2604 , 1499/2605 , 2165/2606, 2165/2607 , 42/2608 , 1522/2609 , 2123/2610 , 2498/2611 , 2090/2612 , 1521/2613 , 1521/2614, 1521/2615 , 1278/2616, 119/2617 , 1456/2618 , 69/2619 , 1519/2620 , 2417/2621 , 2073/2622 , 2083/2623 , 479/2624 , 2122/2625 , 1968/2626 , 2144/2627 , 1570/2628 , 1913/2629 , 2089/2630 , 1725/2631 , 1074/2632 , 2220/2633 , 1778/2634, 583/2635, 36/2636 , 36/2637 , 6764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 1467/2638 , 1765/2639 , 1765/2640 , 1765/2641 , 1765/2642 , 1765/2643 , 1731/2644, 2007/2645, 2008/2646 , 2013/2647 , 2013/2648, 2577/2649, 2574/2650, 2574/2651 , 2574/2652 , 2553/2653 , 158/2654 , 158/2655 , 158/2656, 158/2657, 158/2658 , 392/2659 , 1828/2660 , 2113/2661 , 2270/2662 , 2272/2663 , 2271/2664 , 280/2665, 1191/2666 , 162/2667 , 2369/2668 , 2370/2669, 2368/2670 , 576/2671 , 787/2672 , 1789/2673 , 503/2674, 1314/2675, 1315/2676 , 2464/2677, 2287/2678 , 384/2679 , 384/2680 , 148/2681 , 1727/2682 , 1557/2683 , 2572/2684, 2531/2685 , 62/2686 , 62/2687 , 2156/2688, 2319/2689 , 2246/2690, 2471/2691 , 191/2692 , 2553/2693 , 1028/2694, 2180/2695, 2358/2696 , 1833/2697 , 2025/2698 , 1016/2699, 1010/2700 , 1008/2701 , 520/2702 , 1012/2703 , 1016/2704 , 1815/2705 , 1816/2706 , 1787/2707 , 425/2708, 2154/2709, 889/2710 , 46/2711 , 2553/2712 , 2163/2713 , 2193/2714 , 2193/2715 , 2412/2716 , 171/2717 , 1365/2718 , 270/2719 , 452/2720 , 380/2721 & 32/2722 .

7 - PLOTS NOS . TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE BAGHUABOLA ( FULL )

8- PLOTS NOS . TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE KUMUNDA ( PART

650, 651 , 652, 656, 950 , 951 , 952, 953 , 954, 955 , 956, 957, 958, 959 , 960 , 961 , 962, 963 , 964, 965 , 966, 967, 972 , 973, 974 , 975 , 976 , 977, 978 , 979, 980 , 981 , 982, 983 , 984, 985, 986, 987 , 988 , 989, 990, 991 , 992, 993 , 994, 995 , 1404, 978/5782 , 979/5783 , 1404/5785 ,

984/5803 , 956/6013 , 956/6014 & 956/6015 .

9- PLOTS NOS . TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE KUSUMAPAL ( PART )

345, 346 , 347 , 348, 349 , 350 , 351 , 352, 353, 354 , 355, 356 , 357 , 358, 359 , 360, 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372, 373 , 434 , 450/989 & 434/1085.

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION - .

A-B- C-D : "A" point starts from the trinjuction piller of village - Kumunda, Balugadia &kusumpal , then proceeds along the Eastern bank of Ghurudia Nalla upto point "B" then the line passes along the Southern boundary of plot No.383 , Northern , Eastern Southern boundary of plot No. 434 of village - kusumpal and meets on point "C" line again passes along the Earstern bank of Ghuridia Nalla to Point " D ", the trinjuction piller of village Bhalugadia , Gopal Prasad and Nuhuamuhin Protected forest .

D-E- F: the line starts from point " D " passes along the Eastern boundary of Nisa Protected forest up to point " E" then the line turns towards Western & Southern boundary of NISA P , F. & passes through NISA P , F & NISA Village .

6765

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

F-G-H: From Point " F " the line proceeds through Plot No. 285,45,46,47 along the southern boundary of plot No.272,39,38 and passes through plot No. 51,271,53,75,77,78,311 and along the Southern boundary of plot No. 306 and then passes through the plot No. 329 of village Balichandrapur , Up to Point 'G ' then the line pases through plot No. 2194,2196 , 1870 of village Kankerei & meets on the point 'Η' .

H-I - J : From point ' H ' the line turns towards north through Plot No. 1870,2173 2181 and moves towards west & passes through again Plot No. 1870 and passes along Western boundary of plot No. 1874 then passes through Plot No , 1877 ,1876, 1848 , 1849 , then along the Eastern boundary of 1837,1836 again passes through 1831 , 1739, 1740,1747,1747,1746,1748,1727,1726,11748,1727,1726 , 1692, 1690,1689,1686 , and then crossed the road plot no . 1785 then passes along the Eastern boundary of plot No. 1760 the passes through plot No. 740,739,738,735 of village Kankerei and crossed the Ghurudia Nalla and meets on point -I " then the line passes through plot No. 807.808,809 , 800 of village - Kaunsidipha & meets on point ' J ' i.e. the common boundary of village Kaunsidhipa & Chhotaberini .

J - K: From the point J the line passes through plot No. 204, 205,206,209 , 210,213 , 193, 192, 187 , 184, 171 , 150 , 132, 137, 138 ,140, 141,87,338, 85, 84 of village Chhotaberini . & crossed Singda Jora i.e Plot No. 312 and meets on the Point ' K' i.e common boundary of village Chhotaberini . Jaipur Protected Forest .

K-L : From point ' K the line proceeds through Jaipur Protected forest up to Point ' L' i.e trinjuntion piller of village Kankarei , Kumunda & Jaipur protected forest .

L-A: From the point ' L ' the line passes along Western & Northern Boundary of plot No , 972 Northern boundary of Plot No , 973,074,967,963,950,958,652,656,952 ,951,950,993,995 of Villgae Kumunda & passes along the Northern bank of Singda Jora i.e Plot No. 1404 and again crossed the Singda Jora and proceeds along the Southern bank of Singda Jora i.e Plot No 2589 and meets at point ' A " i.e the starting point.

[No. 43015/6/2003- P.R.I.W. ] GARGI MUKHERJEE , Director

नई दिल्ली , 15 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2672. - केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई और भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड (ii ) तारीख 13 सितम्बर, 2003 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यां का.आ. 2588 तारीख 4 सितम्बर, 2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में, जिसका माप 13.599 हेक्टर ( लगभग) या 33.60 एकड़ (लगभग) है, खनिजों के खनन, खदान, बोर करने, उनकी खुदाई और तलाश करने , और खनिजों को तलाश करने, उन्हें प्राप्त करने उन पर कार्य करने और उन्हें ले जाने के अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ;

6766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii )| और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का, पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और छत्तीसगढ सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है, कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 13.599 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 33.60 एकड़ ( लगभग) माप वाली भूमि में खनिजों के खनन , खदान बोर करने, उनकी खुदाई करने और खनिजों के तलाश करने, उन्हें प्राप्त करने, उन पर कार्य करने, उन्हें ले जाने के अधिकार अर्जित किये जाने चाहिए ;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 9 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है, कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 13.599 हेक्टर ( लगभग) या 33.60 एकड़ ( लगभग) माप वाली भूमि में खनिजों के खनन, खदान, बोर करने, उनकी खुदाई करने और खनिजों को तलाश करने , उन्हें प्राप्त करने , उन पर कार्य करने उन्हें ले जाने के अधिकार अर्जित किए जाते है ;

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं० एसईसीएल /बीएसपी/जीएम/ ( पीएलजी) / भूमि/ 290 तारीख 09 जून, 2004 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर, रायगढ ( छत्तीसगढ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

अनुसूची

छाल ब्लाक ( विस्तार)

रायगढ़ क्षेत्र

जिला -रायगढ़ ( छत्तीसगढ़)

खनन अधिकारः

ग्राम का नाम

जिला क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

तहसील

टिप्पण क्रम संख्या

पटवारी हल्का नम्बर

1 .

बंधापाली

8.550

धरमजयगढ रायगढ

भाग

नवापारा

3.299

धरमजयगढ रायगढ

3. खेडापाली 31

रायगढ

1.750

भाग

धरमजयगढ

कुल क्षेत्रः-

हेक्टर (लगभग)

या 33.60 एकड़ ( लगभग )

13.599 6767 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

( 1 ) ग्राम बंधापाली ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए गये प्लाट संख्याकः- 410 ( भाग ) .

( 2 ) ग्राम नवापारा ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए गये प्लाट संख्याकः 479 (भाग ) , 480,481,482 ( भाग) 483 ( भाग) , 484 ( भाग) , 485 ( भाग ) , 486 (भाग ) .

(3) ग्राम खेडापाली ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए गये प्लाट संख्याकः- 5/2 ( भाग ) , 5/4 ( भाग ) .

सीमा वर्णनः

क ख रेखा बिन्दु " क" से ग्राम खेडापाली- बंधापाली की सम्मिलित सीमा पर आरंभ होती है, और भागतः खेडापाली- बंधापाली ग्रामों की सम्मिलित सीमा के साथ जाकर बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग-घ रेखा भागतः प्लाट 410 की पश्चिमी सीमा, बाद में प्लाट संख्या 410 से होते हुए ग्राम नवापारा में प्रवेश करती है। और प्लाट संख्या 479,484,485,486 से होते हुए बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है । 66

घ-ड़-ड़1 रेखा ग्राम नवापारा के संख्या 486,485,484,483,482 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 481 की दक्षिणी सीमा से जाकर बिन्दु " ड़ा " पर मिलती है ।

31-च-क. रेखा ग्राम बंधापाली के प्लाट 410 से होकर ग्राम खेडापाली में प्रवेश करती है और प्लाट संख्या 5/2 , 5/4 से होकर आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. - 43015/12/2001- पी. आर. आई. डब्ल्यू. ] गार्गी मुखर्जी, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 15th October , 2004

S. O. 2672.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 2588 dated the 4th September , 2003 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in Part II , Section- 3 , Sub- Section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India . dated the 13th Septeinber , 2003 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire the rights to mine , quarry bore , dig and search for , win , work and carry away minerals in the lands measuring 13.599 hectares ( approximately ) or 33.60 acres (approximately ) in the locality specified in the Schedule appended to that notification ;

And whereas the competent authority , in pursuance of section 8 of the said Act , has made its report to the Central Government ;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the report aforesaid report and after consulting the Government of Chhattisgarh , is satisfied that the rights to mine , quarry , bore , dig and search for, win , work and carry away minerals in the lands measuring 13.599 hectares (approximately) or 33.60 acres ( approximately ) described in Schedule appended hereto should be acquired;

6768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 9 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the rights to mine , quarry, bore , dig and search for , win , work and carry away minerals in the lands measuring 13.599 hectares (approximately ) or 33.60 acres ( approximately ) described in the Schedule appended hereto are hereby acquired .

2.. The plan bearing No. SECL/ BSP /GM (Plg )/ Land /290 dated 9th June , 2004 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the Office of the Collector , Raigarh (Chhattisgarh ) or in the Office of the Coal Controller , 1, Council House Street , Calcutta or in the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section) , Seepat Road, Bilaspur 495006 (Chhattisgarh ) .

Schedule

Chhal Block (Extension)

Raigarh Area

District - Raigarh ( Chhattisgarh)

Mining Rights

Tahsil

District

Remarks

Area in hectares

Serial Number

Name of village

Patwari halka number

8.550

Part Bandhapali

Dharamjaygarh Raigarh

3.299

Part 31

Navapara

Dharamjaygarh

Raigarh

Part Khedapali

Raigarh 1.750

Dharamjaygarh Total area 13.599 hectares ( approximately) or 33.60 acres ( approximately)

(1) Plot numbers acquired in Village Bandhapali ( part) : - 410 (part).

(2) Plot numbers acquired in village Navapara ( part) : -

479 (part ) , 480 , 481,482 (part) , 483 ( part ) , 484 (part ) , 485 ( part) , 486 ( part ) .

(3) Plot numbers acquired in village Khedapali ( part ) : - 5/2 ( part ) , 5/4 (part) .

Boundary description : -

A-B :

Line starts from point "A" on the common boundary of villages Khedapali- Bandhapali and passes partly along the common boundary of village Khedapali- Bandhapali and meets at point " B" .

B- C- D : Line passes partly along the Western boundary of plot number 410 , then through plot number 410 of village Bandhapali , then enter in village Navapara and passes through plot numbers 479,484,485,486 and meets at point "D" .

D- E- E1 : Line passes through plot numbers 486,485,484,483,482 , southern boundary of plot number 481 of village Navapara and meets at point "El " .

6769 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

E1 -F -A : Line passes through plot number 410 of village Bandhapali , then enterin village Khedapali passes through plot numbers 5/2 , 5/4 and meets at starting point "A" .

[No. 43015/12/2001- P.R.I.W.J GARGI MUKHERJEE , Director पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 18 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2673.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री . एम . वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , लोनी टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका , पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

3050 G1/04-7A 6770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

अनुसूची तालूका: कडेगाँव

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 1

उपाले वांगी

121

120

सर्वे नंबर 120 और

119 के बीच का रास्ता

119

सर्वे नंबर 119/11

और 2 अ के बीच का

नाला

119

सर्वे नंबर 119 और

118 के बीच का रास्ता

118

113

143

सर्वे नंबर 143 और

148 के बीच का नाला

148

147

146

145

158

156

159

सर्वे नंबर 159/2 में

का अस्फालटेड रास्ता

160

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

6 7

00 47 20

00 01 88 1 अ + 2अ

00 01 80 2 क

00 10 80 2 ड

00 01 50 2जी 00 09 90 2 एच

07 2 के

00 09 00 2 एल

00 06

00 02 58 1

00 45 26

00 21

28 2

50 1

00 31 06 2

00 00 47 3/ब + 4/अ

00 14 69 4 ब

00 07 34

00 02

00 06 39

00 08

00 23 87 3

00 19 02

00 21

50 1

00 30

00 02 98

00 31 67 3

कुल:

3050 G1/04-7B [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

677

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : कडेगाँव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 उपाले मायणी

160

158

157

156

146 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 42

00 32

00 13 65

00 34

गट नंबर 146 और

200 के बीच

का नाला

199

200

00 02

00 11

गट नंबर 200 के बीच

में नाला

203

204

247

246

00 01

00 08

16 अ

00 15 90 अ

00 67

गट नंबर 246 (अ) के

00 02 66

बीच का रास्ता

269

281

279

277

278 3

224

225

226

222

220

219

217

216

215

214

213

212

211

161

261

264 me

00 72 67

00 10 92

00 10 22

00 18

14 कुल: 03 72

00 05

00 19

00 00 87

00 09 98

00 04

00 09

00 08

17 50

00 08

00 10

00 04

00 06

00 19

00 08 50 6772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : कडेगाँव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 3

तोंडॉली

262

263 (निरंतर )

265

284

285

.286

287

290

291

292

297

293

295

294

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

00 67

00 09 33

00 00 52

00 05

00 04 79

00 05

00 04 92

00 20

00 16 90

00 16 32

00 19 65

00 01 73

गट नंबर 294 और

307 के बीच का

00 03 42

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

307

277

311

310

309

314

315

316

403

404

402

408

400

399

398

397

396

395

375

380

00 36 73

00 12 94

00 03 18

00 20 25

00 02 43

00 06

00 07

00 02 51

00 08

00 26 82

00 02 57

00 01 36

00 06

00 04 09

00 03 37

00 04 83

00 04 48

00 10 71 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6773

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : कडेगाँव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 3

तोंडॉली

393

381 (निरंतर)

382

383

379

2002

385

589

594

595

596

597

598

603

602

696

697

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर एयर

उप-खण्ड सं.

00 01 31

00 05

00 05 38

00 17

00 10 76

00 01

00 13

00 21

00 26

00 01

00 26

00 13 84

00 06

गट नंबर 697 और

00 03 55

701 के बीच का रास्ता

701

692

700

691

690

689

688

687 4

895 अमरापुर

898

899

900

901

872

856

864

863

862

00 04 83

00 02 53

00 32 35

00 01 90

00 09 49

00 03 25

07 06 31 कुल

00 24 97

00 07 48

00 05 03

00 05

00 05 65

00 20

00 01 92

00 27

00 01

00 08 69 6774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालूका: कडेगाँव

गाव का नाम

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 4

860 अमरापुर

859 (निरंतर)

858

834

823

925

830

827

826

825

824

929

933

1739

940

945

946

957

958

959

960

961

955

963

964

962

965

967

968

969

973

974

975

980

981

983

984

985

मीटर

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 5

00 04

00 08 02

00 06 58

00 03

00 03 35

00 08

00 04

00 03

00 08

02 10

00 06

00 15

00 07

00 06 56

00 12 18

00 06

00 05 15

00 05

05 86

00 02 19

00 03 83

00 03 65

00 04

00 01

00 02 28

00 03

00 12

00 09

00 08

00 04

00. 02

00 04 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6775

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक1,1926

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : कडेगाँव

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 4

988 अमरापुर

989 (निरंतर)

990

991

994

995

996

1000

1001

1006

1012

1011

1015

1016

1017

1018

1030

1031.

1032

1033

1036

1037

1038

1039

1040

1041

1042

1043

1044

1045

1046

1048

1049

1050

1051 5

येवलेवाडी

206

205

207

208

एयर मीटर

वर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 5

01 43

00 03

0004

00 01

00 02 73

00 01 28

00 02

00 03

00 02

02 80

03 56

00 24 19

00 04

00 04 52

00 05

00 04

00 03 68

00 01 80

00 02

05 64

00 06

00 05

00 12 67

คว 07 82

00 03

05 27 48 कुल:

00 04

00 29 25

00 10

00 03 69 6776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23, 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : कडेगाँव

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 येवलेवाडी

212

211 (निरंतर)

204

210

213

219

220

218

221

225

226

230

231

234

236

237

245

248

249

एयर मीटर

वर्ग

हेक्टर

सं.

6 7

8 5

04 98

00 08 46

00 04

00 05 13

17 09

00 04

00 04 99

00 05

00 15

00 05

00 04 04

00 15

00 02

00 03

00 16

00 09

00 05 30

गट नंबर 265/5 और

249 के बीच का राज्य

मार्ग 78

256

193

192

190

188

187

186

175

174

173

गट नंबर

00 07

00 05

00 04 69 5

00 05

00 02 93

00 02 76

00 03

00 06

00 11 05

00 05

00 04

00 01 21

00 06

173,172,171 के बीच

की कनाल

172

171

168

167

162

00 05

00 04

00 01

00 05 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6777

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : कडेगाँव

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 5

येवलेवाडी

159

156 (निरंतर)

155

149

148

146

134

133

132

131

130

128

127

126

125

122

121

120

119

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

00 02 95

00 03 60

00 13 42

00 03

00 06

00 10

00 02

00 08

00 15

00 01

00 13 29

00 05

00 05 09

00 05 41

00 00 38

गट नंबर 120 और

00 03

शिवणी गाँव सीमा के

बीच का रास्ता

हणमंत वडिये

04 09

कुल:

गट नंबर 182 और

00 02 08

अमरापुर गाँव सीमा के

बीच का रास्ता

182

49 15

06 11

गट नंबर 182 का

गाडी रास्ता

गट नंबर 181 का

00 01

गाडी रास्ता

181

180

179

175 7

शिवणी

209

211

00 30 27

00 28 55

00 32

01 65

कुल:

00 13

00 26 6778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : कडेगाँव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 7

शिवणी

210

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

6 7

00 14 94

गट नंबर 210 और

(निरंतर)

00 03 98

212 का गाडी रास्ता

212

214

171

247

249

248

264

263

262

00 10 69

00 07 19

00 49 50

00 02 69

00 00 10

00 16 92

00 34 91

00 02 55

00 05 54

गट नंबर 262 और

गाँव सीमा के बीच में

00 13 71

येरला नदी

वडिये रायबाग

02 03 05 कुल:

गट नंबर 1413 और

गाँव सीमा के बीच में

00 14 01

येरला नदी

1413

1383

1384

1382

1381

1380

1379

1378

1377 3

10 4

00 01 79

35 5

00 06

00 02

42 7

85 15

10 17

00 03 72 00 03

12 19

00 13 77 20

00 06 06 21

00 11

00 09

00 02 26

00 01 31

00 02 63

00 03 87

00 04

22 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6779

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : कडेगाँव

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 8

वडिये रायबाग

1374

1373 (निरंतर )

1372

1349

1347

1345

1344

1343

1340

1339

1338

1337

1329

1333

1332

1293

1292

1291

1290

1289

1288

1287

1277

1276

1275

1259

1261

1262

1255

1254

1253

1252

1251

1249

1246

1247

1248

1245

मीटर

वर्ग

हेक्टर एयर

उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 09 49

00 09 04

00 04 19

00 04 88

02 77

00 03 61

00 01 88

00 03 21

00 04 45

00 05

00 03 45

00 04

00 05 22 9

00 03 21 7

00 05 39 14

00 05 31

00 16

00 04 80

00 05

00 04 82

00 06 12

00 04 42

00 03

00 02

00 04

00 02

00 03

00 04 51

00 08 51

00 03

00 06

00 02

00 02 69

00 03

00 02 59

00 01 99

00 12 6780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

तालूका: कडेगाँव

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

उप -खण्ड

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 8

वडिये रायबाग

1244

1243 (निरंतर )

1239

1238

1237

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

6 7

00 02 63

00 02 36

00 02 24

00 02 66

00 00 21

गट नंबर 1237 और

1235 का गाडी रास्ता

1235

1116

00 01

गट नंबर 1114 और

1115 के बीच का

1109

1115

गट नंबर 1114 ,

00 00 89

00 00 37

00 00 91

1115 और 1116 के

00 01 95

बीच का नाला

1114

1112

1111

1102

1118

1065

1063

1062

1120

1121 सेलकबाव

258

259

370

372

404

411

413

414

415

402

389

388

384

382

00 04 49

00 06 67

00 06 65

00 31

00 57 51

00 15 95

00 47 70

00 12 16

00 12 50

00 08 06

05 25 98 कुल:

00 50 19

00 17 18

00 24 48

00 08

00 10 08

00 04

76 00

00 10 08 00 27

45 6781 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

जिला : सांगली

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : कडेगाँव

क्षेत्रफल

उप -खण्ड

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

सं.

कम सं.

6 7

सेलकबाव

13 88

566

(निरंतर )

00 01 46

565

00 23

567

564

गट नंबर 562/1 और

564 के बीच का

00 03

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

00 97

563

20 56

562

02 07

562

19 47

562

31 35

562

00 19 78

03 23

कुल

[फा. सं. आर-31015/29/2004-ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

Ministry of Petroleur: and Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 18th October, 2004

S. O. 2673.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas ,it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Rightof User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA I , 1926

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ] under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority , Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka , Pune District , Maharashtra -412 201

SCHEDULE

Taluka KADEGAON

Dist: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 1 UPALE VANGI

121

120

Nala in between

Survey No

120 and 119

119

Nala in Survey No

119/ 1A & 2A

119

Road in between

Survey No

119 and 118

118

113

143

Nala in between Survey No

143 and 148

148

147

146

145

158

156

159

Asphalted Road in

Survey No 159/2

160

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub- Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8 5

00 41 23

00 47 20

00 01 88 1A+2A

00 00 10

00 01 80 2 C

00 10 80 2D

00 01 50 2G

00 09 90 2H

00 00 07 2K

00 09 00

00 06 30 2L

00 02 58 1

00 45 26 2

00 21 28 1

00 00 50 1

00 31 06 2

00 47

3/B + 4/A 00 14 69

07 34

00 02 41

00 06 39

00 08 94

00 23 87 3

00 19 02

00 21 81 1

00 00 50 2

00 30 79

00 02 98 3

00 31 67

01 34 Total: 04 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6783

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

Taluka : KADEGAON

Dist: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 2 UPALE MAYNI

160

158

157

156

146 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 42 15

00 32 17

00 14 43

13 65

00 34 67

Nala in between

02 76

GatNo 146 & 200

199

200

11 10

Nala in Gat No 200

203

204

247

246

00 01 81

00 08 70

00 00 16

15 90 A

00 67 68

Mud Road in Gat

00 02 66

No. 246 A

269

281

279

277

278 3

TONDOLI

224

225

226

222

220

219

217

216

215

214

213

212

211

161

261

264

00 72 67

00 10 92

00 10 22

00 11 54

00 18 75

03 72 14 Total:

00 05 53

00 19 22

00 00 87

00 09 98

00 04 55

00 11 46

00 09 87

00 08 22

00 17 50

00 08 66

00 10 63

00 04 56

00 06 64

00 19 41

00 10

00 08 50 6784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKΑ 1 , 1926

Taluka: KADEGAON

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] State : MAHARASHTRA

Dist: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 1

262

263 TONDOLI (Contd.)

265

284

285

286

287

290

291

292

297

293

295

294

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

00 67

00 09 33

00 00 52

00 13 73

05 27

00 04 79

00 05 23

00 04 92

20 79

16 90

00 00 34

00 16 32

00 19

00 01 73

00 03 42

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

294& 307

307

277

311

310

309

314

315

316

403

404

402

408

400

399

398

397

396

395

375

380

00 36 73

00 12 94

00 03 18

00 20 25

13 41

02 43

00 06

00 07 60

00 05 59

00 08 67

00 26 82

02 57

00 00 72

00 01 36

00 06 78

00 04 09

03 37

04 83

00 04 48

10 71

00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6783

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

Taluka: KADEGAON

State : MAHARASHTRA

Dist: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 1

TONDOLI

393

381 (Contd.)

382

383

379

2002

385

589

594

595

596

597

598

603

602

696

697

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

00 01 31

00 05 75

00 05 38

17 16

00 10 76

01 61

00 00 08

00 73

00 13 22

21 03

26 45

01 56

14 79

13 84

06 75

03 55

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

697 & 701 .

701

692

700

691

690

689

688

687 4

895 AMRAPUR

898

899

900

901

872

856

864

863

862 3050 G1/04-8A

00 11 95

04 83

00 02 53

00 32 35

00 01 90

00 09

00 03 25

06 31

Total:

00 07 48

00 05 03

00 05 69

05 65

20 43

01 92

00 27 64

00 01

00 6786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka : KADEGAON

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Dist: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 4

AMRAPUR

860

859 (Contd.)

858

834

823

925

830

827

826

825

824

929

933

1739

940

945

946

957

958

959

960

961

955

963

964

962

965

967

968

969

973

974

975

980

981

983

984

985 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare Sq.mt

7 8 5

00 04 91

00 08 02

00 06 58

00 03 71

00 03 35

00 08 47

00 04 47

00 03 48

00 08 96

02 10

00 06

15 43

07 25

00 06 56

00 29 88

00 11 62

00 12 18

00 06 89

00 05 15

05 10

00 05 86

02 19

00 00 79

00 03 83

03 65

00 00 10

00 04 19

00 01 24

02 15

00 02 28

00 03 17

00 00 21

00 12 23

00 09 10

00 08 76

00 04 80

00 02 28

04 23

3050 Gl/04-8B [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6787

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

Taluka : KADEGAON

State : MAHARASHTRA

Dist: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 2

AMRAPUR

988

989 (Contd .)

990

991

994

995

996

1000

1001

1006

1012

1011

1015

1016

1017

1018

1030

1031

1032

1033

1036

1037

1038

1039

1040

1041

1042

1043

1044

1045

1046

1048

1049

1050

1051

206 5 YEVELEVADI

205

207

208

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

00 01

03 84

00 04 46

00 01 99

00 02 73

01 28

00 02

00 03

02 65

00 08 28

03 01

02 80

05 23

03 56

03 90

24 19

00 11

04 50

04 52

05 78

00 05 00

04 96

03 68

01 80

02 48

05 02

07 82

03 08

05 27 48 Total:

04 18

00 29 25

00 6788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Taluka : KADEGAON

Dist: SANGLI

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Sub -Division No.

Nameofthe Village

Hectare Are Sq.mt 2

7 5 YEVELEVADI

212

00 04 98

211

00 08 46 (Contd .)

204

00 04

210

00 05 13

213

219

00 04 93

220

00 04 99

218

00 05 81

221

00 15 93

225

00 05 32

226

00 04 04

230

00 15 54

231

00 02 66

234

00 02 97

236

00 0375

237

00 16 72

245

00 09 26

248

00 05 30

00 17 61

249

SH -78 in between

00 07 11

GatNo

249 & 255/5

256

00 05 24

256

00 04 69

193

00 05 41

192

00 02 93

190

00 02 76

188

00 03 30

187

00 06 22

186

175

00 05 99

174

00 04 89

173

00 01 21

Unlined Canal in

06 97

GatNo 173 ,

172& 171

172

171

00 05 30

168

00 04 28

167

00 01 50

162

00 05 39 6789

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Taluka : KADEGAON

State: MAHARASHTRA

Dist: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 2

159 5

156 YEVELEVADI (Contd.)

155

149

148

146

134

133

132

131

130

128

127

126

125

122

121

120

119

Metalled Road in between Gat No 120 & V.B of Shivni

HANMANT VADIYE

Area

Sub -Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

7 8

00 02 95

00 03 60

13 42

00 04 27

03 47

06 32

00 10 87

00 02 48

00 08 22

08 76

00 61

00 15

00 01

13 29

05 36

00 05 09

00 05

00 00 38

00 03 63

04 09 55 Total:

00 02 08

Metalled Road in

between V.B of

Amarapur& Gat No

182

CartTrack in Gat No 182

CartTrack in Gat

No 181

181

180

179

175 7

209 SHIVNI

211

00 49 15

00 30 27

00 28 55

00 32 60

01 65 Total:

26 58

00 6790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka : KADEGAON

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

Dist : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 7

SHIVNI

210 (Contd.)

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

00 14 94

00 03 98

CartTrack in Gat

No 210 & 212

212

214

171

247

249

248

264

263

262

00 07 19

00 49 50

00 02 69

00 10

00 16 92

00 34 91

00 02 55

05 54

13 71

Yerla River

between Gat No

262& V.B

02 03 05 Total:

Yerla River

VADIYE RAYBAGH

between Gat No

1413 & V.B

1413

1383

1384

1382

1381

1380

1379

1378

1377

00 10 4

00 01 79 16

00 11 12

06 35 6

00 02 42 7

00 00 85

00 00 10 15

00 03 72

00 03 12 18

00 13 77 20

00 06 06 21

00 00 72

11 41

00 09

02 26

00 01 31

02 63

00 03 87

00 04 22 6791

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

Dist: SANGLI

Taluka : KADEGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

1374 VADIYE

1373 RAYBAGH

1372 (Conta.)

1349

1347

1345

1344

1343

1340

1339

1338

1337

1329

1333

1332

1293

1292

1291

1290

1289

1288

1287

1277

1276

1275

1259

1261

1262

1255

1254

1253

1252

1251

1249

1246

1247

1248

1245

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

7 8 5

09.

00 09 04

04 19

00 04 88

02 77

03 61

01 88

00 03 21

00 04 45

00 05 31

00 03 45

04 12 4

05 22

03 21 7

05 31

16 55

04 80

00 05 33

00 04 82

06 12

03 50

02 32

04 23

00 02 81

00 03 84

00 10

04 51

00 19

02 32

08 51

03 40

00 06

06 09

00 02 25

02 69

03 29

02 59

01 99

12 42

00 6792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka : KADEGAON

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Dist: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 8

VADIYE

1244 RAYBAGH

1243 (Contd.)

1239

1238

1237 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 02 63

00 02 36

00 02 24

00 02 66

00 00 21

CartTrackbetween

Gat No 1237 &

1235

1116

00 04 99

00 12 48

00 01 11

Nala in between

Gat No 1114 &

1115

1109

1115

00 00 89

00 00 37

00 00 91

Nala in between

GatNo 1114,

00 01 95

1115 & 1116

1114

1112

1111

1102

1118

1065

1063

1062

1120

1121 9 SHELEGBAV

258

259

370

372

404

411

413

414

415

402

389

388

384

382

00 04 49

00 06 67

00 06 65

00 31 13

00 57 51

00 15 95

00 47 70

00 12 16

00 12 50

00 08 06

05 25 98

00 50 19

00 17 18

00 24 48

00 08 64

00 10 08

00 04 32

00 14 76

00 09 36

00 10 08

00 27 36

00 00 41

00 00 54

00 00 34

00 00 45 6793 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

Dist: SANGLI

Taluka : KADEGAON

Area

Gat No.

Survey No.

Sub-Division No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Nameof the Village

00 13 88

566

SHELEGBAV

00 08 38

566

(Contd.)

01 46

565

00 23 25

567

00 00 68

564

00 03 67

Asphalted Road in

Between Gat No

564& 562/1

00 97

563

00 20 56

562

02 07

562

00 19 47

562

00 04

562

00 31 35

562

00 19 78

562

23 75

Total:

[No. R-31015/29/2004- O.R. - ii ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 18 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2674.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , लोनी वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका, पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 टर्मिनल , कदमवाक को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : खानापुर

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 1

भाळवणी

1081

1080

1166

1165

1163

1164

1152

1129

1130

1150

1140 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 25

00 46 56

00 09

00 06 86

00 13 22

00 09

00 16

00 35 95

गट नंबर 1150

का रास्ता

गट नंबर 1140

का रास्ता

1142

1498

1499

1500

1497

1382

1513

1507

1509

1510

1512

1511

1513

1524

1547

1523

1521

1522

00 07

00 26 01

00 13 13

00 04 81

00 28

00 01 07

00 01

00 06 72

00 09

00 01 93

00 15

00 46

00 12

00 03 31

00 01 60 6795

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : खानापुर

क्षेत्रफल

उप -खण्ड

गट नंबर

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 1

गट नंबर 1522 भाळवणी (निरंतर )

और 43 के बीच

का नाला

गट नंबर 43 का

रास्ता

गट नंबर 98 और

99 का रास्ता

280

283

281

282

296

297

298

293

298

293

311

312

310

313

240 2

अळसुद

237

236

234

232

142

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

सं.

16 50

00 03

00 01

00 21

00 30

10 40

00 07

00 12

00 26

00 18 88

00 11

00 26

00 27 26

00 04 36

00 26 27

00 32 78

00 06 22

26 66

कुल:

00 04 29

00 04

00 07

00 6796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : खानापुर

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 2

230 अळसुंद (निरंतर)

229

224

225

221 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 5

00 28 35

00 32 31

00 41 36

24 77

गट नंबर 221 का

04 31

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

2271

2270

2269

2268

2267

2266

2245

2243

2242

2241

2216

2217

2218

2219

2220

2221

2222

2223

2202

2201

2200

2198

00 18

00 10 68

00 22 01

00 00 62

00 37 89

00 00 89

00 31

00 19

00 16 49

00 04

24 71

00 18 55

18 26

00 07 03

00 05

00 11

00 27 46

00 03 75

00 22 65

गट नंबर 2198 और

2193 के बीच का

00 04 68

राज्य मार्ग नं . 111

2193

2195

2196

2197 3

119 तांदुळवाडी

346

118

112

00 06

00 05

00 11 81

05 74 कुल: 06

00 21 25

00 31

16 43

00 13

02 17

00 03 79 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6797

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : खानापुर

गट नंबर गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

112 3 तांदुळवाडी (निरंतर )

112

126

129

140

142

143

144

145

146

151

152

154

155

158

159

160

179

196

197

198

213

212

214

215

216

217

220 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 02

32 9

04 80

05 13

00 03

00 02

00 04

08 81

00 08 71

00 08 09

03 35

00 03

00 16

03 38

17 03

00 14

00 07 69

13 17

08 78

00 01

00 05

00 04 35

00 15

गट नंबर 220 का

रास्ता

00 01

गट नंबर 220 और

260 के बीच की

00 08 09

बलवाडी कनाल

260

259

258

00 07

00 05 6798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : खानापुर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 3

00 06 72

256

तांदुळवाडी (निरंतर)

और सीमा

00 11 44

के बीच में येरला

गट नंबर 256

आंधली गाँव

नदी

कुल: 03 54 41

[फा. सं. आर-31015/28/2004- ओ.आर-11 ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 18th October, 2004

S. O. 2674.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas , it appearsto the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority, Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village, Haveli Taluka . Pune District , Maharashtra - 412 201 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6799

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

SCHEDULE

Taluka : KHANAPUR

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Sr. No.

Survey No.

Name of the Village

4 1

BHALAVANI

1081

1080

1166

1165

1163

1164

1152

1129

1130

1150

1140 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.m t

8 5

00 25 05

00 25

00 46 56

00 00 10

00 09 59

00 06 86

54 12

00 13 22

00 09 05

00 16 20

00 35 95

Metalled Road in

00 00 47

GatNo 1150

Metalled Road in

00 07 12

Gat No 1140

1142

1498

1499

1500

1497

1382

1513

1507

1509

1510

1512

1511

1513

1524

1547

1523

1521

1522

00 26 01

13 13

00 04 81

00 00 04

00 28 50

00 00 60

00 01 07

00 01 48

00 06 72

00 09 53

00 00

00 01 93

00 15

00 46 57

00 00 03

00 12 15

00 03

00 01 60 6800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka : KHANAPUR

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

District : SANGLI

Sr. No.

GatNo.

Survey No.

Nameofthe Village

4 1

BHALAVANI

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are

Sq.m t

7 8

Nala between Gat

00 06 07

No 1522 & 43

00 28 83

00 03 50

Asphalted Road in

GatNo 43

00 38 88

16 50

00 03

Metalled Road in

between Gat

No 99 & 98

280

283

281

282

296

297

298

293

298

293

311

312

310

313 2

ALSUND

240

237

236

234

232

142

00 01 62

00 21 61

30 10

10 40

00 07 28

07 87

00 12

00 26 86

00 18 88

11 64

11 72

00 15 91

00 00 15

00 26 61

00 27 26

00 18

00 04 36

00 26 27

00 32

00 06 20

00 26 06

85 17 Total:

00 04 87

00 04 20

00 04 66

00 07 30

00 08 12 1

00 37 18 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

Taluka : KHANAPUR

District : SANGLI

Gat No. Sr. No.

Survey No.

Name of the Village

4 2 ALSUND

230

229

224

225

221 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division No.

Hectare Are

Sq.m t

00 28 35

00 32 31

00 41 36

24 77

45 83

Asphalted Road in

00 04 31

GatNo 221

2271

2270

2269

2268

2267

2266

2245

2243

2242

2241

2216

2217

2218

2219

2220

2221

2222

2223

2202

2201

2200

2198

SH - 111 in

between Gat No

00 18 14

00 10 68

22 01

00 00 62

00 37 89

00 00 89

00 31 59

00 19 00

00 19

00 16 49

04 41

24 71

00 18 55

00 18 26

07 03

00 05 91

05 22

00 76

00 11 96

00 27 46

00 03 75

00 22 65

04 68

2198& 2193

2193

2195

2196

2197 3 TANDULVADI

119

346

118

112

112 3050G1/04-9A

06 75

00 06 86

00 05

00 11 81

06 05

Total:

00 21 25

00 31 59

16 43

00 13 48 3

00 03 79 6802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : KHANAPUR

GatNo.

Sr. No.

Survey No.

Nameof the Village

4 3

112 TANDULVADI

112

126

129

140

142

143

144

145

146

151

152

154

155

158

159

160

179

196

197

198

213

212

214

215

216

217

220

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are

Sq.m t

8 5

02 82 6

00 32

00 00 20 9

00 39 24

04 80

00 05 13

00 03 35

00 02 60

04 34

00 08 81

00 08

08 09

03 35

08 87

00 03 50

00 16 53

00 03 38

05 56

17 03

00 07 69

00 13

08 78

00 00 05

01 30

00 01 48

00 05 07

00 04 35

00 15 22

Metalled. Road In

00 01 19

GatNo. 220

Balavadi Canal

00 08 09

between Gat No

220& 260

260

259

258

00 07 16

00 07 83

3050 Gl/04-9B भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : KHANAPUR

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Name of the Village

Sq.m t

7 8

00 06

256

3 TANDULVADI

00 11

Yerla River

between Gat No

256& V.B of

Andhali

54 41

Total: 03

[No. R-31015/28/2004-O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 18 अक्तूबर, 2004

अधिसूचना

का. आ. 2675.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी और भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 1528 तारीख 25 जून , 2004 द्वारा उडीसा राज्य में पारादीप से पश्चिमी बंगाल राज्य में हल्दिया तक इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा कच्चे तेल के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन हेतु उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट तहसील सोरो और बालासोर , जिला बालासोर , उडीसा की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 29-07-2004 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार पाइपलाइनें बिछाए जाने हेतु अर्जित किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 6804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

अनुसूची

जिला : बालेसर

राज्य : उड़िसा

क्षेत्रफल

तहसिल का नाम गाँव का नाम खसरा संख्या

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

सोरो

618

गुड़

6194

619

6193

622

624

6191

623

678

676

683

682

681

677

504

199

498

200

201

203

202

204

0 .

205

207

233

234

264

265

267

266

17 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6805

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

100

101

103

105

115

116

113

112

117

118

122

123

124

125

121

127

128

131

132

141

142

140

892

893

891

894

895

896

890

889

1471

1473

1464

1472

1484

1503

1463

1504

09 6806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4 1

1537

1538

1536

1553

1554

1531

1555

1556

1592

1583

1581

1582

1585

1584

1587

1586

1654

1655

1653

1656

1657

1658

1648

1661

1662

1644

1643

1660

1684

1642

1641

1687

1688

1686

1689

1690

1196

1695

1696

1694

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ]

92 6807

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1697

1180

1177

2526

2527

2528

2529

2533

2535

2532

2531

2581

2537

2580

2579

2582

2612

2611

2613

2614

2615

2623

2624

2621

2628

2622

2625

2627

2630

142

पाटीमुन्डा

238

02 6808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

3 1

दिनापाही

219

220

216

223

207

206

205

224

204

200

198

201

199

154

153

152

770

बालीकतीरन

792

584

581

586

585

590

591

589

595

594

596

598

600

774

607

606

470

454

456

455

457

451

[PART II Sac. 3(ii) ] 5

10 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

450

449

447

460

438

436

434

435

433

348

345

346

349

141

छट्टूपाटी

169

294

290

295

289

296

288

285

286

ง

283

281

282

284

277

276

278

272

271

270

267

268

269

262

261

206

6809 5

33 6810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKΑ 1 , 1926

259

257

258

1236

पोराड़िहा

1237

1238

1239

1240

1244

1223

1222

1208

1217

1216

1215

1214

909

1262

ब्रहमपुर

619

620

618

614

615

612

611

610

529

609

535

534

530

531

528

525

524

469

468

-0

464

463

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

670

96 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

414

465

413

411

412

406

403

402

401

400

395

396

319

358

357

327

1245

328

330

332

333

334

337

336

206

200

198

197

180

179

178

177

176

175

168

169

158

6811 5

03 6812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4 1

170

157

151

156

152

154

153

155

142

143

144

145

146

127

107

108

106

109

110

1221

931

992

993

994

995

996

997

1002

1220

अन्जी

1333

1335

1339

1336

1338

1341

1342

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

31 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1346

1352

1347

1351

1353

1350

2954

1349

2793

2791

2794

2927

2928

2804

2807

2806

2805

2789

2819

2821

2820

2825

2779

2776

2726

2772

2771

2770

2769

2768

2840

2762

2767

2761

2760

2634

2635

2484

6813

10 6814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4 1

2483

2636

2482

2638

2480

2950

2479

2478

2463

2464

2414

2405

2404

2403

2406

2383

2384

2382

2381

2368

2367

2339

2355

2356

2352

2353

2354

2356

2355

2241

2240

2245

2238

2239

2237

2236

साहसपुरा

2927

2928

2926

[ PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii)] 5

34-

22 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6815

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

2925

2924

2929

रनभन्जपुर

407

677

कान्हेओगालपुर

713

714

712

711

708

685

707

705

706

686

692

690

691

693

673

696

695

694

744

743

745

1091

742

747

758

757

759

04 6816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

765

763

761

762

791

792

793

787

1070

779

781

1104

794

1105

1027

1026

1025

855

856

860

861

858

863

887

890

889

888

917

898

915

916

920

913

912

908

910

909

907

940

83 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

3 1

941

942

943

रानीगन्ज

923

924

933

932

961

955

954

952

951

979

981

980

982

983

989

990

991

988

992

993

860

859

857

833

834

831

835

836

830

829

827

488

करन्जाबीन्धा

1856

1855

1945

1854

0 3050 G1/04-10A

6 08

03 07

23 01

17 00

10 06

22 00

10 15

59 10

42 10

25 09

29 00

10 11

56 03

20 05

52 00

72 01

07 06

93 05

39 02

47 00

45 05

03 03

51 08

41 24

32 02

15 00

10 06

93 04

62 02

11 04

96 02

01 08

02 00

25 07

22 06

34 05 6818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1853

1844

1847

1848

1759

1796

1797

1795

1760

1761

1747

1748

1746

1742

1743

1744

1689

1692

1691

1705

1695

1703

1704

1608

1697

1072

1206

1073

1205

1074

1204

1203

1202

1201

1169

1170

1171

1172

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)] 5

3050 Gl /04-108 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

689

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

3 1

1173

1197

1176

1174

1175

978

977

976

975

974

705

706

707

708

710

711

712

900

899

734

733

735

731

732

740

730

741

746

742

745

750

751

744

756

755

758

759

281

282

06 6820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKΑ 1 , 1926

4 1

283

285

286

295

296

294

297

298

251

253

2015

2003

247

246

245

235

234

215

212

214

211

210

209

190

158

104

105

106

107

108

1994

113

832

डोलपुर

831

833

830

834

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 5

04 6821

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

835

829

828

827

824

825

826

797

798

794

799

793

792

904

फतेहपुर

908

909

928

929

910

911

912

927

919

921

851

852

848

849

847

846

991

844

842

841

840

832

830

829

827

05 6822

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

3 1

824

कल्यानी

1314

1311

4023

1310

1308

1303

1309

1301

1302

1284

1287

1286

1279

1273

1271

1272

1269

602

605

607

609

606

610

595

584

585

586

414

417

416

415

419

421

400

399

393

392

396

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

-02

10 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

391

384

385

386

372

373

374

375

198

199

197

196

195

210

161

211

160

159

158

156

155

1178

नौपुर

1179

1180-

1181

1185

1186

1187

1188

1172

1168

1189

6823

01 6824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1166

1165

1167

1164

1120

1121

1122

1123

1125

1124

1126

4051

1131

1134

1132

1111

1108

1107

1106

292

297

299

4057

300

235

236

252

253

251

248

250

249

4095

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 5

52 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4078

1300

सालागन

1299

1298

1297

1295

1290

1296

1291

1294

1293

1224

1225

1226

1222

1223

1221

1203

1206

1205

1201

1202

1160

484

485

474

473

6825

10 6826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

472

471

470

465

464

431

432

463

462

437

438

439

440

399

398

400

401

232

233

234

226

235

225

221

224

222

219

218

216

185

1425

1426

183

142

140

136

137

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

23 6827

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

746

ओडसाल

742

743

745

744

739

740

741

729

730

728

542

537

536

535

525

453

नारायनबारा

1382

1381

1367

1379

1378

1368

1369

1377

1387

1389

1375

1390

1392

1970

श्रीजन्ग

बालेसर

1971

1969

1968

1967

1966

1965

74.

20 6828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

3 1

1943

1942

1941

1940

1911

1912

4910

5358

4909

4911

1910

1908

1907

1903

1902

1901

1897

1898

1885

1853

1852

1854

1849

1848

1798

1797

1796

1795

1794

1793

4944

1792

1791

1726

चकश्रीरामपूर

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 5

10 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2706

बोईता

2566

2567

2572

2571

2570

2574

2531

2530

2524

2525

2527

2528

2511

2510

2512

2513

2495

2494

2740

2493

2492

2497

2480

2489

2488

2481

2487

2019

2014

1989

1992

1991

6829

00 6830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1993

1994

1998

1997

1999

2000

1996

2003

2002

2004

120

राहानीयागडीया

120

121

122

119

114

123

174

173

172

180

182

183

184

214

170

163

162

160

159

158

157

155

136

137

138.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 5

10 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

209

1359

गम्भारिया

1360

1361

1358

1364

1354

1368

1369

2637

1421

1422

1425

1426

1424

1428

1429

1430

1431

1432

1524

1523

1513

2620

6831

00 6832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1512

1511

1510

1509

1508

1502

2549

1503

1500

1504

2585

1499

1498

1497

1494

1496

1495

1604

1616

1701

1617

1618

1698

1619

1620

1622

1623

1624

1628

1666

1664

1665

1663

1668

1662

1657

1651

1650

1649

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 5

74 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1647

1646

2501

2502

1645

2503

2506

2504

2505

774

तुन्उरा

776

777

779

781

5653

783

784

786

819

4967

818

816

815

814

813

812

810

809

847

852

851

850

871

872

870

4045

4812

4813

865 3050 G1/04-11A

6833

03 6834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

220

कौनपूर

221

216

211

210

208

184

185

207

206

205

204

202

203

192

196

302

303

304

544

536

537

532

531

524

523

525

519

518

514

513

1544

512

511

562

565

569

567

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 5

3050 G1/04-11B भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

568

695

570

571

694

688

692

691

1567

1479

689

684

685

670

671

668

667

793

666

162

भीमपुर

161

157

156

155

149

150

145

143

136

137

130

4385

104

105

107

121

111

110

109

6835

02 6836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4698

4764

4763

268

275

4579

276

525

चान्दिपुर

421

585

422

419

420

423

[PART [ 1-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 5

34 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

413

414

415

411

410

356

354

357

353

508

352

350

351

348

582

491

छेलियापाड़ा

492

494

519

495

446

447

450

521

522

523

451

452

445

408

407

414

415

416

404

344

341

343

342

6837

03 6838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

3 1

340

337

338

310

313

312

336

314

321

315

545

316

साहाजानगर

1684

1685

1495

1440

1439

1438

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

82 6839 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2282

जयदेबकस्बा

2286

2287

2285

/ 07

2318

5045

2320

2316

2315

2314

5576

2313

2337

2336

2339

5376

2340

2341

5034

3057

3056

5345

3052

3051

2342

3046

3045

3041

3021

3022

3023

3017

3016

3013

3004 6840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

3003

2998

2997

2963

2962

2980

2965

2981

2967

2969

2968

5587

2976

2971

2904

2905

2901

2899

2840

2829

2839

2830

2831

2838

5547

2837

5365

2804

2803

2802

2801

2798

5294

2797

2796

5505

2755

2795

2760

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 5

40 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2761

532

531

माजहीकीया

1015

1023

993

पुरूषोत्तमपुर

112

बाराकिया

111

105

104

110

109

106

6841

02 6842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

103

1672

1278

1690

1689

201

1746

1694

1778

203

202

205

206

207

1867

209

208

210

1687

222

314

313

312

307

309

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

18 6843

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

308

342

331

341

339

340

338

337

336

344

335

462

पदमपूर

505

511

513

512

532

533

535

534

536

537

508

582

583

580

584

615

604

605

609

606

607

608

1822

1874

1878

1877 6844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1872

1879

1880

1870

1881

2019

1907

1908

1906

1916

1917

1915

1914

1913

1925

1963

1962

1961

1964

1960

1954

1953

2092

2086

2087

2091

2096

2095

2482

2481

2479

2478

2477

2476

2474

2475

2466

2473

2468

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ] 5

53 6845

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2457

2453

2452

2451

2448

2438

2437

2449

2436

2405

2399

2404

2403

549

तलपाडा

551

550

552

553

554

627

560

561

562

569

568

571

572

574

573

580

581

519

517

516

518

510

508

509

507

02 6846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

493

494

496

497

185

186

464

461

462

460

434

435

436

438

437

399

371

372

370

662

375

663

365

379

625

356

357

355

358

308

647

354

353

350

352

351

317

318

320

[PART II--SEC . 3 ( ii )] 5

64 6847

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

319

322

1815

गुडु

1816

3031

5004

3029

3026

3024

3025

3023

3020

3022

3021

2282

2283

2284

5690

5470

2279

2268

2269

2270

2271

2272

2274

2276

2254

5249

2255

2252

5282

5686

2253

2341

2319

2316

2318

2326

00.

03 6848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1. 1926

2329

2327

2330

2332

2333

2336

5549

2348

2347

2346

2350

2351

रानासाही

2621

2582

2616

2617

2615

2614

2636

2613

2611

2612

2608

2607

2441

2439

2437

2436

2435

2329

2330

2434

2331

2338

2332

2334

2333

2398

2383

2384

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ) 5

10 6849

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2386

2371

2387

2249

2246

2245

4144

2244

2249

4434

2248

2253

2250

4408

2251

4261

2255

2256

2257

2258

2259

2266

2262

2263

2264

2069

2070

2229

2226

2227

3925

2228

2220

2219

2218

4192

2215

2216

2897

2998 3050 G1/04-12A

04 6850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA. 1. 1926

3 1

2901

2900

2902

2903

2904

2908

2907

2905

2906

1322

4189

हिरीगान

2110

2111

2112

2109

2113

2114

2115

5606

5633

2177

2021

5524

2020

2019

2018

2017

1978

1977

1974

1973

1966

1963

1960

1957

1698

1699

1956

1700

5555

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 5

3050 G1/04-12B भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1954

1703

1710

1711

5569

1713

1714

1715

5525

1716

1919

1906

1907

1901

1900

1895

1894

1887

1882

1883

1860

1867

1866

1862

1850

1851

1852

1842

1841

1843

1844

1828

1827

1826

1817

1816

1815

1792

1794

1795

6851

01 6852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1718

1799

1809

1812

1811

418

421

409

408

407

406

301

390

379

373

381

380

386

382

383

100

191

175

172

178

174

173

177

178

179

180

181

157

156

168

250

273

274

275

277

[PART II-SEC. 3 (it) ] 02

85 का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 भाग II- खष्ठ 3 (ii) ]

271

278

279

280

284

283

285

286

182

825

पात्रापाड़ा

824

802

800

796

795

794

791

790

786

785

781

773

779

772

760

757

758

766

754.

745

746

747

1218

741

739

737

736

730

677

6853

02 6854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4 1

676

854

पूराना बालेसर

857

859

858

1165

868

870

873

880

879

881

882

878

894

893

897

898

900

904

905

915

914

916

913

912

949

948

947

964

963

962

961

1312

361

959

362

964

363 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

-08

92 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

371

370

372

373

386

381

382

386

407

412

1627

2577

1626

948

485

पाल बालेसर

484

486

481

487 6856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIΚΑ Ι , 1926

461

334

333

341

342

340

339

521

346

427

352

353

355

356

387

386

385

393

384

383

394

पाखराबाद

204

211

214

215

216

217

250

252

251

247

246

245

224

223

298

297

299

300

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 5

67 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

543

542

301

528

520

529

531

532

526

525

524

757

499

498

497

500

493

492

477

481

480

478

811

454

839

456

455

451

457

458

452

450

459

785

धुसुली

782

781

780

754

775

6857

04 6858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4 1

776

764

774

765

762

766

767

768

683

682

675

681

676

670

669

665

666

663

664

449

662

815

448

450

451

447

445

440

443

442

444

383

382

380

379

378

376

375

374

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

12-

55 6859

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

100

डुमरिया

1109

193

113

117

116

192

118

190

206

188

187

186

214

215

213

212

211

210

218

325

309

326

327

328

1066

329

330

1092

332

331

334

333

300

299

252

294

290

292 6860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

291

288

286

287

281

358

357

367

368

366

363

375

377

485

254

मधुसुदनपुर

282

283

618

617

616

615

609

611

610

613

630

640

643

639

644

646

647

714

653

705

655

704

700

698

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii)] 5

14 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

695

808

809

810

685

813

815

817

816

1408

851

852

895

892

893

853

888

889

887

886

882

883

885

1473

1378

100

मन्दाधार

262

टेन्टुलीमुन्ड़ी

263

260

266

289

267

268

191

190

189

6861

01 6862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1. 1926

4 1

188

अकिनिया

316

318

315

317

314

302

363

304

305

294

310

292

291

286

354

284

179

135

142

136

138

137

335

112

109

111

बिसनुपुर

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

29 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

सारगान

649

648

647

646

645

644

639

640

625

624

621

620

617

609

611

610

189

जुनागडिया

130

100

6863

04 6864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4 1

हिन्जीला

501

500

497

494

493

227

219

220

218

213

212

214

211

208

209

527

24.

507

518

अमारा

766

588

587

574

584

583

579

522

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 5

09 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3068

पडाबाउगान

3069

3070

3066

3065

3107

3108

3109

3301

3225

3300

3226

3299

3290

3228

3284

3283

3282

3281

3236

3233

3197

3237

3195

3193

3238

3192

3504

3191

3190

3246

263

बाहादलपुर

323

319

320

321

322

308 3050 G1/ 04-13A

6865

29.

23 6866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

313

309

285

299

298

293

292

[ फा. सं. आर-25011/19/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 18th October, 2004

S. O. 2675.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1528 dated the 25th June , 2004 issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declas intention to acquire the right of user in the land in Tehsil : Soro & B District: Balasore , in Orissa State , specified in the schedule appendeca notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia in the State of West Bengal by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Paradip Haldia Crude Oil Pipeline Project . e, st And whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 29.07.2004;

And whereas , the Competent Authority, has under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to thisNotification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vests from the date ofpublication of this declaration, in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

3050 Gl/04-13B 6867 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Schedule

State : Orissa

District : Balasore

Area

Khasra No.

Name of Village

Name of Tehsil

Are Sq . mtr .

Hectare

618

Gud

Soro

6194

619

6193

622

624

6191

623

678

676

683

682

681

677

04.

504

199

498

200

201

203

202

204

205

207

233

234

264

265

267

266

85 6868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

100

101

103

105

115

116

113

112

117

118

122

123

124

125

121

127

128

131

132

141

142

140

892

893

891

894

895

896

890

889

1471

1473

1464

1472

1484

1503

1463

1504

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 5

.02

44 6869

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- ड 3 ( ii) ]

1537

1538

1536

1553

1554

1531

1555

1556

1592

1583

1581

1582

1585

1584

1587

1586

1654

1655

1653

1656

1657

1658

1648

1661

1662

1644

1643

1660

1684

1642

1641

1687

1688

1686

1689

1690

1196

1695

1696

1694

01 6870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1697

1180

1177

2526

2527

2528

2529

2533

2535

2532

2531

2581

2537

2580

2579

2582

2612

2611

2613

2614

2615

2623

2624

2621

2628

2622

2625

2627

2630

142

Patimunda

238

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 5

69 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

219

Dinapahii

220

216

223

207

206

205

224

204

200

198

201

199

154

153

152

770

Baliktiran

792

584

581

586

585

590

591

589

595

594

596

598

600

774

607

606

470

454

456

455

457

451

6871

00 6872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIKA 1, 1926

450

449

447

460

438

436

434

435

433

348

345

346

349

Chhatubati

141

169

294

290

295

289

296

288

285

286

283

281

282

284

277

276

278

272

271

270

267

268

269

262

261

260

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii ) ] 5

33 6873

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

259

257

258

1236

Poradiha

1237

1238

1239

1240

1244

1223

1222

1208

1217

1216

1215

1214

909

1262

Brahampur

619

620

618

614

615

612

611

610

529

609

535

534

530

531

528

525

524

469

468

464

463 5

670

01 6874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

3 1

414

465

413

411

412

406

403

402

401

400

395

396

319

358

357

327

1245

328

330

332

333

334

337

336

206

200

198

197

180

179

178

177

176

175

168

169

158

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] 5

01.

03 6875

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

170

157

151

156

152

154

-0

153

155

142

143

144

145

146

127

107

108

106

109

110

1221

931

992

993

994

995

996

997

1002

1220

1333

Anjee

1335

1339

1336

1338

1341

1342

04 6876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1, 1926

1346

1352

1347

1351

1353

1350

2954

1349

2793

2791

2794

2927

2928

2804

2807

2806

2805

2789

2819

2821

2820

2825

2779

2776

2726

2772

2771

2770

2769

2768

2840

2762

2767

2761

2760

2634

2635

2484

[PART II- SEC . 3(ii) ] 5

פם

10 6377

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2483

2636

2482

2638

2480

2950

2479

2478

2463

2464

2414

2405

2404

2403

2406

2383

2384

2382

2381

2368

2367

2339

2355

2356

2352

2353

2354

2356

2355

2241

2240

2245

2238

2239

2237

2236

2927

Sahaspura

2928

2926

01 6878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

2925

2924

2929

Ranbhanjpur

407

677

Kanheiogalpur

713

714

712

711

708

685

707

705

706

686

692

690

691

693

673

696

695

694

744

743

745

1091

742

747

758

757

759

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 5

38 6879

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

765

763

761

762

791

792

793

787

1070

779

781

1104

794

1105

1027

1026

1025

855

856

860

861

858

863

887

890

889

888

917

898

915

916

920

913

912

908

910

909

907

940

02 6880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1. 1926

941

942

943

923

Rahaniaganj

924

933

932

961

955

954

952

951

979

981

980

982

983

989

990

991

988

992

993

860

859

857

833

834

831

835

836

830

829

827

488

1856

Karanjabindha

1855

1945

1854

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 5

34 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1853

1844

1847

1848

1759

1796

1797

1795

1760

1761

1747

1748

1746

1742

1743

1744

1689

1692

1691

1705

1695

1703

1704

1698

1697

1072

1206

1073

1205

1074

1204

1203

1202

1201.

1169

1170

1171

1172

3050 G1/04-14A 6882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1173

1197

1176

1174

1175

978

977

976

975

974

705

706

707

708

710

711

712

900

899

734

733

735

731

732

740

730

741

746

742

745

750

751

744

756

755

758

759

281

282

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 5

3050 G1/04-14B -6883

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

283

285

286

295

296

294

297

298

251

253

2015

2003

247

246

245

235

234

215

212

214

211

210

209

190

158

104

105

106

107

108

1994

113

832

Dolpur

831

833

830

834

04 6884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIK.Α 1. 1926

835

829

828

827

824

825

826

797

798

794

799

793

792

904

Fatehpur

908

909

928

929

910

911

912

927

()

919

921

851

852

848

849

847

846

991

844

842

841

840

832

830

829

827

0 PART 11-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

12.

05 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

824

1314

Kalyani

1311

4023

1310

1308

1303

1309

1301

1302

1284

1287

1286

1279

1273

1271-

1272

1269

602

605

607

609

606

610

595

584

585

586

414

417

416

415

419

421

400

399

393

392

396

6885

03 6886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

391

384

385

386

372

373

374

375

198

199

197

196

195

210

161

211

160

159

158

156

155

1178

Nuapur

1179

1180

1181

1185

1186-

1187

1188

1172

1168

1189

ĮPART 11-SEC.3 ( ii) ] 5

48 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1166

1165

1167

1164

1120

1121

1122

1123

1125

1124

1126

4051

11:31

1134

1132

1111

1108

1107

1106

292

297

299

4057

300

235

236

252

253

251

248

250

249

4095

61 05

52 00

94 00

08 03

10 00

28 01

31 01

57 05

92 09

76 02

10 00

25 07

10 04

34 02

75 04

00 03

09 03

42 04

97 02

66 04

07 11

33 07

01 03

45 07

07 04

10 05

30 07

62 06

46 00

76 03

10 00

94 09

96 03

68 03

73 03

04 03

52 6888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIΚΑ 1 , 1926

4078

1300

Salagan

1299

1298

1297

1295

1290

1296

1291

1294

1293

1224

1225

1226

1222

1223

1221

1203

1206

1205

1201

1202

1160

484

485

474

473 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)]

34 6889

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

472

471

470

465

464

431

432

463

462

437

438

439

440

399

398

400

401

232

233

234

226

235

225

221

224

222

219

218

216

185

1425

1426

183

142

140

136

137

02 6890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

746

Odshal

742

743

745

744

739

740

741

729

730

728

542

537

536

535

525

453

Narayanabara

1382

1381

1367

1379

1378

1368

1369

1377

1387

1389

1375

1390

1392

1970 Balasore

Srijang

1971

1969

1968

1967

1966

1965

0 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

00 6891

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1943

1942

1941

1940

1911

1912

4910

5358

4909

4911

1910

1908

1907

1903

1902

1901

1897

1898

1885

1853

1852

1854

1849

1848

1798

1797

1796

1795

1794

1793

4944

1792

1791

1726

Chak Srirampur

14 !

03 6892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4 1

Boita

2706

2566

2567

2572

2571

2570

2574

2531

2530

2524

2525

2527

2528

2511

2510

2512

2513

2495

2494

2740

2493

2492

2497

2480

2489

2488

2481

2487

2019

2014

1989

1992

1991

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 5

65 6893

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1993

1994

1998

1997

1999

2000

1996

2003

2002

2004

120

Rahaniyagadia

121

122

119

114

123

174

173

172

180

182

183

184

214

170

163

162

160

159

158

157

155

136

137

138

00 6894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

209

1359

Gambharia

1360

1361

1358

1364

1354

1368

1369

2637

1421

1422

1425

1426

1424

1428

1429

1430

1431

1432

1524

1523

1513

2620

0 [PART II-SEC . 3 (1. ,

00 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1512

1511

1510

1509

1.508

1502

2549

1503

1500

1504

2585

1499

1498

1497

1494

1496

1495

1604

1616

1701

1617

1618

1698

1619

1620

1622

1623

1624

1628

1666

1664

1665

1663

1668

1662

1657

1651

1650

1649

6 5

58 01

37 02

30 02

95 02

28 00

11 01

41 04

81 00

20 00

12 05

32 01

59 03

50 04

21 01

04 04

10 00

08 04

17 03

10 00

54 04

78 01

33 04

85 01

43 02

85 01

85 03

20 03

96 01

63 04

17 00

77 02

21 02

31 OC

06 05

73 02

89 05

18 07

74 05 6896

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1647

1646

2501

2502

1645

2503

2506

2504

2505

774

Tundra

776

777

779

781

5653

783

784

786

819

4967

818

816

815

814

813

812

810

809

847

852

851

850

871

872

870

4045

4812

4813

865 6397

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

220

Kuanrpur

221

216

211

210

209

208

184

185

207

206

205

204

202

203

192

196

302

303

304

544

536

537

532

531

524

523

525

519

518

514

513

1544

512

511

562

565

569

567 3050 Gl/04-15A

01 6898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1. 1926

568

695

570

571

694

688

692

691

1567

1479

689

684

685

670

671

668

667

793

666

162

Bhimmpur

161

157

156

155

149

150

145

143

136

137

130

4385

104

105

107

121

111

110

109

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

3050 G1/04-15B भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4698

4764

4763

268

275

4579

276

525

Chandipur

421

585

422

419

420

423

6899

00 6900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKLA 1 , 1926

413

414

415

411

410

356

354

357

353

508

352

350

351

348

582

491

Chheliapada

492

494

519

495

446

447

450

621

522

523

451

452

445

408

407

414

415

416

404

344

341

343

342

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 5

16.

01 6901

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

340

337

338

310

313

312

336

314

321

315

545

316

Sahajanagar

1684

1685

1495

1440

1439

1438

00 6902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

2282

Jaydevkasba

2286

2287

2285

2318

5045

2320

2316

2315

2314

5576

2313

2337

2336

2339

5376

2340

2341

5034

3057

3056

5345

3052

3051

2342

3046

3045

3041

3021

3022

3023

3017

3016

3013

3004

PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] 5

36 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1 , 1926 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

3003

2998

2997

2963

2962

2980

2965

2981

2967

2969

2968

5587

2976

2971

2904

2905

2901

2899

2840

2829

2839

2830

2831

2838

5547

2837

5365.

2804

2803

2802

2801

2798

5294

2797

2796

5505

2755

2795

2760

65 12

60 03

88 02

76 03

85 01

40 00

25 04

10 00

88 02

27 04

16 04

98 01

63 03

44 03

60 04

32 01

60 00

87 00

74 01

14 03

18 63

83 05

10 00

83 00

13 06

10 00

26 06

74 01

96 00

52 08

10 00

40 6904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4 1

2761

532

531

Majhikia

-0

1015

1023

993

Purastampur

112

Barakia

111

105

104

110

109

106

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

10 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004 कार्तिक 1,1926 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

103

1672

1278

1690

1689

201

1746

1694

1778

203

202

205

206

207

1867

209

208

210

1687

222

314

313

312

307

309

6905

06 6906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

3 1

308 .

342

331

341

339

340

338

337

336

344

335

462

Padampur

505

511

513

512

532

533

535

534

536

537

508

582

583

580

584

615

604

605

609

606

607

608

1822

1874

1878

1877

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

01-

33 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (i ) ]

1872

1879

1880

1870

1881

2019

1907

1908

1906

1916

1917

1915

1914

1913

1925

1963

1962

1961

1964

1960

1954

1953

2092

2086

2087

2091

2096

2095

2482

2481

2479.

2478

2477

2476

2474

2475

2466

2473

2468

6907

00 6908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

3 1

2457

2453

2452

2451

2448

2438

2437

2449

2436

2405

2399

2404

2403

549

Talapada

551

550

552

553

554

627

560

561

562

569

568

571

572

574

573

580

581

519

517

516

518

510

508

509

507

0 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

32 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

493

494

496

497

185

186

464

461

462

460

434

435

436

438

437

399

371

372

370

662

375

663

365

379

625

356

357

355

358

308

647

354

353

350

352

351

317

318

320

6909

23.

01 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

6910

319

322

1815

Gudu

1816

3031

5004

3029

3026

3024

3025

3023

3020

3022

3021

2282

2283

2284

5690

5470

2279

2268

2269

2270

2271

2272

2274

2276

2254

5249

2255

2252

5282

5686

2253

2341

2319

2316

2318

2326 [PART II-SBC. 3(ії)]

86 6911

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2329

2327

2330

2332

2333

2336

5549

2348

2347

2346

2350

2351

2621

Ranasahi

2582

2616

2617

2615

2614

2636

2613

2611

2612

2608

2607

2441

2439

2437

2436

2435

2329

2330

2434

2331

2338

2332

2334

2333

2398

2383

2384

00 6912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIΚΑ 1 , 1926

2386

2371

2387

2249

2246

2245

4144

2244

2249

4434

2248

2253

2250

4408

2251

4261

2255.

2256

2257

2258

2259

2266

2262

2263

2264

2069

2070

2229

2226

2227

3925

2228

2220

2219

2218

4192

2215

2216

2897

2998 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 5

18 6913

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2901

2900

2902

2903

2904

2908

2907

2905

2906

1322

4189

2110

Hirigan

2111

2112

2109

2113

2114

2115

5606

5633

2177

2021

5524

2020

2019

2018

2017

1978

1977

1974

1973

1966

1963

1960

1957

1698

1699

1956

1700

5555 3050 G1/04-16A

02 6914

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1954

1703

1710

1711

5569

1713.

1714

1715

5525

1716

1919

1906

1907

1901

1900

1895

1894

1887

1882

1883

1860

1867

1866

1862

1850

1851

1852

1842

1841

1843

1844

1828

1827

1826

1817

1816

1815

1792

1794

1795 [PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

3050G1 /04-16B 6915

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1718

1799

1809

1812

1811

418

421

409

408

407

408

391

390

379

373

381

380

386

382

383

190

191

175

172

176

174

173

177

178

179

180

181

157

156

158

250

273

274

275

277

01 6916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

271

278

279

280

284

283

285

286

182

825

Patrapada

824

802

800

796

795

794

791

790

786

785

781

773

779

772

760

757

758

766

754

745

746

747

1218

741

739

737

736

730

677

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (it) ] 5

40 6917

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004 कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

676

854

Puranabalasore

857

859

858

1165

868

870

873

880

879

881

882

878

894

893

897

898

900

904

905

915

914

916

913

912

949

948

947

964

963

962

961

1312

361

959

362

964

363

01 6918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

4 1

371

370

372

373

386

381

382

386

407

412

1627

2577

1626

948

Palbalasore

485

484

486

481

487

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 5

71 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004 /कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

461

334

333

341

342

340

339

521

346

427

352

353

355

356

387

386

385

393

384

383

394

204

Pakhrabar

211

214

215

216

217

250

252

251

247

246

245

224

223

298

297

299

300

6919 5

06-

03 6920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

543

542

301

528

520

529

531

532

526

525

524

757

499

498

497

500

493

492

477

481

480

478

811

454

839

456

455

451

457

458

452

450

459

Dhusuli

785

782

781

780

754

775

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 5

50 6921

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

776

764

774

765

762

766

767

768

683

682

675

681

676

670

669

665

666

663

664

449

662

815

448

450

451

447

445

440

443

442

444

383

382

380

379

378

376

375

374

01 6922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

100

Dumuria

1109

193

113

117

116

192

118

190

206

188

187

186

214

215

213

212

211

210

218

325

309

326

327

328

1066

329

330

1092

332

331

334

333

300

299

252

294

290

292

PART II SEC . 3 ( ii)] 5

64 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

291

288

286

287

281

358

357

367

368

386

363

375

377

485

254

Madhusudanpur

282

283

618

617

616

615

609

611

610

613

630

840

643

639

644

646

847

714

653

705

655

704

700

698

6923

14 6924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

695

808

809

810

685

813

815

817

816

1408

851

852

895

892

893

853

888

889

887

886

882

883

885

1473

1378

100

Mandadhar

262

Tentulimundi

263

260

266

289

267

268

191

190

189

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] 5

53 6925

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]

3 1

188

316

Akinia

318

315

317

314

302

363

304

305

294

310

292

291

286

354

284

179

135

142

136

138

137

335

112

109

111

Bishnupur

79.

29 6926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA I , 1926

4 1

649

Sargan

648

647

646

645

644

639

640

625

624

621

620

617

609

611

610

189

Junagadia

130

100

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

03 भारत को राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,15 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

501

Hinjila

500

497

494

493

227

219

220

218

213

212

214

211

208

209

527

507

518

766

Amara

588

587

574

584

583

579

522

6927 6

09 6928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

3068

Padabadgan

3069

3070

3066

3065

3107

3108

3109

3301

3225

3300

3226

3299

3290

3228

3284

3283

3282

3281

3236

3233

3197

3237

3195

3193

3238

3192

3504

3191

3190

3246

263

Bahadalpur

323

319

320

321

322

308

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

82 6929 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

313

309

285

299

298

293

292

[No. R-25011 /19/2004- O.R. - I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 19 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2676.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के भीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम. वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते), हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, लोनी - टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका , पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

3050 G1/04-17A THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

6930

अनुसूची तालूका : पुरंदर

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 1

सोनोरी

215

150

149

143

145

146

679

705

232

233

242

243

244

245 हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

8 5

00 32 86

00 87 02

00 17

00 43

00 09

00 34

00 29

00 19

00 03

00 26

00 32

00 15

00 08

00 10

00 29

00 19

00 20

00 10

00 11

00 12

00 26

गट नंबर 245 और

248 के बीच में

00 08

गाडी रास्ता

248

276

279

275

251

252पै

253 पै

254 पै

00 16

00 01

00 60

00 09

00 05

00 04

00 12

गट नबर 254 पै

00 02

में मेटल्ड रास्ता

255 पै

00 15

3050 G1/04-17B [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6931

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

तालूका : पुरंदर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 1

सोनोरी

256

257 (निरंतर)

258

259

260 हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 00 06

71 00 08

95 00 08

00 05

05 00 39

गट नंबर 260 और

370के पास का

00 02

मिटटी रास्ता

370

392 00 28

14 00 54

गट नंबर 392

में नाला

399 2

वनपुरी

373

372

371 00

85 कुल: 08

00 64

01 00 07

67 00 08

गट नंबर 371 और

368 के बीच

की भूमि

368

361

360

356

355

353 00 04

26 00 08

41 00 02

73 00 06

07 00 03

38 00 03

78 00 11

गट नंबर 353 में

00 03

राज्यमार्ग 63

गट नंबर 353 और

352 के बीच में

00 04

मेटल्ड रास्ता

352

350

340

341

342 00 11

00 00 15

07 00 02

00 06

60 6932

[PART II- SEC . 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA1 , 1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका पुरदर

जिला: पुणे

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कम सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 2

343

00 08 22 वनपुरी

00 05

344

(निरंतर)

00 10

345

00 02

346

347

348

00 07

349

02 16

कुल :

1/4

108

कुंभारवलण

1/5

00 07

108

1/6

00 14

108

3/7

00 05

108

व/4

00 05

108

ब/5

13 69

108

ब/6

108

00 08

ब/7

00 08

108

ब/8 00 29

108

व/10 00 18

108

गट नंबर 108

ब/ 10 और 111 के

बीच की भूमि

गट नंबर 108

ब/10 और 111 के

बीच की भूमि

00 33

111

00 11

112

00 06

113

00 18

118

00 23

120

119

121

00 10

122

00 06

130

00 18

133

00 16

00 19

26 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6933

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

तालूका : पुरंदर

राज्य : महाराष्ट

जिला : पुणे

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

मट नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 3

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 5

गट नंबर 26 और

00 03

21 के बीच प्रमुख

कुंभारवलण (मिरेहर)

जिला मार्ग 31

2 32

00 17

00 08

00 03

00 12

00 46

गट नंबर 2 के

00 04

पास करहा नदी

गट नंबर 1180

खलद

और गाँव सीमा

00 06

कुंभारवलण के बीच

में करहा नदी

1180

1181

1182

1183

1184

1185

1187

00 20

00 01

00 27

00 01

00 19

गट नंबर 1187

और 1317 के

00 03

बीच में मेटल्ड

1317

00 58

00 02

गट नंबर 1318 में

माला

1318

1319

1348

00 10

गट नंबर 1348 और

1333 के बीच में

00 02

मेटल्ड रास्ता

6934

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : पुरदर

जिला : पुणे

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर कम सं.

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

खलद

00 07

1333

00 02

1334

1335

00 04

1336

1347

00 09

00 23

1344

गट नंबर 1344

00 03

में नाला

00 03

1376

03 97

1378

00 03

1379

00 07

1380

00 13

1382

00 07

1383

00 05

1384

00 08

1398

00 10

1397

00 17

1395

00 04

1396

00 08

1394

गट नंबर 1396

और 876 के बीच

00 05

में राज्य मार्ग 64

00 11

876

00 07

874

00 15

872

00 12

870

00 09

868

00 28

867

गट नंबर 867

और 735 के

00 04

बीच में नाला

00 40

735

00 06

733

00 26

732

00 07

726

00 11

725

00 01

724

00 04

723 6935 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : पुरदर

जिला: पुणे

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 2

खलद

00 10

722

721

00 08

(निरेतर )

00 09

720

00 05

719

00 04

718

00 03

717

00 04

716

00 12

715

00 13

714

00 19

713

00 06

712

00 12

711

00 02

710

65 69

फूल:

65 शिवरी

00 02

1034

00 02

1035

गट नंबर 1035

और 1036 के

बीच की भूमि

00 01

1036

00 24

1037

00 13

1038

00 18

1040

00 14

1044

00 08

1051

00 08

1052

00 06

1053

00 10

1054

00 21

1055

00 02

1056

गट नंबर 1056 और

955 के बीच में

मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 03

955

956

00 07

954

00 23

949

00 08

948 6936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

तालूका : पुरदर

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : पुणे

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

उप -खण्ड

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 5

शिवरी

940

941 ( निरंतर )

942

943

944

945

930

946

929

928

926

859

858

855

854

850(पै)

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर एयर

सं.

00 06

00 03

00 15

00 01

00 06

00 16

00 25

00 21

00 07

00 08

गट नंबर 850 पै

और 833 के बीच

की भूमि

833

847

834

गट नंबर

00 04

00 34

00 08

00 27

834 और 837

00 05

के बीच की भूमि

837

828

827

648

647

646

644

642

641

639

637(पै)

636

635

634

632

00 20

00 12

00 09

00 04

00 02

00 04

00 06

00 09

00 06

00 04

00 03

00 02

00 05

00 03

00 04

74 6937

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

तालूका : पुरदर

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला : पुणे

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 5

शिवरी

631

630 (निरंतर )

629

628

627

626

621

981 6

पांगारे

592

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 05

00 04

00 19

06 63

कुल:

00 18

गट नंबर 592

00 04

और 593 के

बीच में नाला

593

00 68

गट नंबर 593 और

671 में अस्फालटेड

रास्ता

671

679

678

00 21

00 46

गट नंबर 678 में

00 01

मेटल्ड रास्ता

672

669

668

667

653

654

655

656

657

00 22

00 08

00 10

00 18

00 04

00 08

00 23

गट नंबर 657 में

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

638

15 6938

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

तालूका : पुरंदर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : पुणे

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 पांगारे

00 23

639

641

10 (निरंतर )

640

00 10

631

00 10

633

00 00

632

00 10

630

00 16

733

734

726

00 12

774

00 13

773

00 04

00 14

765

771

00 12

770

00 21

777

00 10

गट नंबर 777 और

00 02

782 के बीच में

प्रमुख जिला नार्ग

782

778

00 02

779

00 14

780

00 07

892

00 10

893

896

00 07

गढ़ नंबर 908 में

00 02

मेटल्ड रास्ता

908

00 28

909

00 04

906

907

00 01

925

00 04

930

00 07

929

00 05

927

00 03

928

00 06

06 43

कुल:

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6939

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

तालूका : पुरदर

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

सं.

6 7

गट नंबर 2168 में

परिचे

00 01

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

2168

00 17

गट नंबर 2168

और 2172 के

00 02

बीच में प्रमुख जिला

मार्ग 60

2172

00 69

गट नंबर 2172

और 2207 के

00 02

बीच में नाला

2207

2206

2210

2211

2212

2219

2220

2221

2223

2224

2227

2228

2229

2237

2238

2239

2240

2255

2250

2254

2252

2253

2286

2288

2287

2289

00 04

00 02

00 09

00 05

00 07

00 01

00 07

00 05

00 06

00 05

00 04

00 05

00 20

00 09

00 12

00 18 29

00 20

00 04

00 25

00 12

00 10

00 09

00 11 6940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II SBC. 3(ii)] राज्य : महाराष्ट

जिला: पुणे

तालूका : पुरदर

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गांव का नाम

कम सं.

4 1

परिचे

2311

2312 (निरंतर )

2306

2304

2303

2301

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-अड सं.

6 7

25 71

00 10

00 12

00 00 26

00 08

गट नंबर 2301 और

2378 के बीच की

भूमि

2378

2379

2380

2381

2382

2377

2400

2399

2442

2430

2438

2437

2571

2577

2578

2573

2643

2642

2624

2625

2626

2641

2627

2640

2628

2629

2639

00 08

00, 06

10 94

00 05

00 29

00 50

00 25 90

00 14

00 21

00 05

00 37

00 17

00 05

00 03

00 02

00 07

00 01

00 03

गट नंबर 2639 और

2638 के बीच की

भूमि

2638

00 04 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

6941

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

तालूका: पुरंदर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

गाव का माम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

परिचे

2637

2636 (निरंतर)

2632

2635

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 07

00 09

00 12

गट नंबर 2635

में नाला

2754

2724

2730

2732

2731

2733

2729

2728

3065

3064

3063

3062

3061

3060

3059

3058

3057

3056

3055

3054

3097

00 39

00 09

00 18

00 15

00 05

00 04

00 55

00 16

00 21

00 14

00 07

00 03

00 04

00 02

00 03

00 06

00 05

00 01

00 28

गट नंबर 3097 और

3095 के बीच में

00 05

गाडी रास्ता

3095

3096

3104.

3106

3104

3109

3110

3111

00 03

00 61

00 16

00 13

00 98

00 14

00 01

कुल:

6942

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

तालूका : पुरंदर

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] राज्य महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 8

हरणी

195(पै)

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 35

गट नंबर 195 पै

में अस्फालटेड

रास्ता

194

193

192

166

165

164

163

168

162

153

147

148

00 01

00 32

00 02

00 07

00 19

00 21

00 02

00 14

00 03

00 10

00 15

00 26

00 18

गट नंबर 80 में

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

951

949

00 27

00 18

00 01

00 33

00 06

00 10

00 14

00 10

00 09

गट नंबर 949 और

938 के बीच में

00 02

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

938

935

00 22

00 03 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6943

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,19

तालूका : पुरदर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 हरणी

934

946 (निरतर )

924

921 (पै)

925

918

917

916

915

914

891

890

889

888

903

गट नंबर 903 और

904 के बीच

की भूमि

902

901

904

900

899

898

897

894

895

602

603

607

604

605

822

818

819

820

807

806

गंट नंबर 806 और

961 के बीच में

गाडी रास्ता

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 06

00 04

00 02

00 01

00 02

00 00

00 03

00 05

00 04

00 05

00 01

00 03

00 04

00 06

00 07

00 09

00 08

00 19

00 08

00 18

00 01

00 06

00 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] 6944

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : पुरंदर

जिला : पुणे

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

हरणी

16 8

00 00

961

962

( निरंतर )

963

00 01.

964

00 07

802

00 03

803

00 03

10.

804

662

00 09

678

679

680

00 02

681

00 07

682

00 03

683

712

00 06

711

00 19

716

719

718

00 03

720

722

00 56

00 01

723

00 15

760

762

00 26

759

00 05

758

08 03

कुल:

वीर

1783

00 10

1782

1787

00 04

1786

गट नंबर

1786 और 1785

00 02

के बीच की भूमि

गट नंबर

1797 और 1785

00 01

के बीच की भूमि

00 01

1798

00 02

1799 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6945

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

तालूका: पुरंदर

राज्य : महाराष्ट

जिला: पुणे

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 1

वीर

1803 9

गट नंबर ( निरंतर )

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

8 5

6 7

1803 और 1804

के बीच की भूमि

1804

1809

1808

1807

1806

गट नंबर

00 03

00 02

00 01

1806 और 1850

के बीच की भूमि

1850

1845

1846

1844

गट नंबर

00 05

00 18

00 12

1844 और 1833

के बीच की भूमि

1833

1828

2016

2017

2023

गट नंबर

2051 में प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 63

2051

2032

2031

2030

2029

2028

2024

2026

2025

2122 3050 G1/04-18A

00 18

00 12

00 11

00 01

00 46

00 01

00 05

00 20

00 02

00 09

00 कुल: 03 15 6946

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

तालूका: पुरदर

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : पुणे

गाव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

मांडकी

1606

1628

1547

1480

1479

1478

1477

1476

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

8 5

00 06

00 57

00 61

00 08

00 11

गट नंबर 1476 और

1266 के बीच में

मेटल्ड रास्ता

1266

1265

1264

1917

1263

1262

1261

1298

1260

1299

1306

1307

1308

1309

1310

1311

1317

1312

1316

1315

00 03

00 04

00 11

00 13

00 02

00 04

00 01

00 04

00 07

00 13

गट नंबर 1315 और

897 के बीच

में नाला

897

898

849

00 25

00 11

3050 GI/04-18B 6947 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

तालूका: पुरदर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कन सं.

6 7

मांडकी

848

00 04

847

( निरंतर )

846

गट नंबर 906 और

908 के बीच में

मेटल्ड रास्ता

840

905

906

00 23

908

00 11

921

00 11

922

923

00 20

926

929

930

931

00 38

735

932

00 15

933

00 05

934

00 10

935

00 03

936

00 06

938

00 26

939

940

गट नंबर 940 और

00 04

गाँव सीमा जेजुर के

बीच में माला

06 33

कुल:

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii )) 6948

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23, 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट तालूका : पुरदर

जिला : पुण

क्षेत्रफल गाव का माम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

उप-अण्ड सं.

जेजुर

00 09

गट नंबर 1148 और गाँव सीमा मांडकी के बीच में नाला

1148

00 01

1129

1128

00 06.

1127

1125

00 05

1124

00 02

1123

1122

00 01

1120

00 05

गट नंबर 1121

00 02

में गाडी रास्ता

1119

00 04

1118

00 08

1117

गट नंबर 1117 और

1116 के बीच की

1116

00 05

1006

00 10

1000

997

00 03

999

00 05

995

991

00 01

992

988

00 05

985

984

00 06

983 6949

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II खण्ड 3 ( i) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : पुन

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सं.

4 1

982 जेजुर

934 (जिरंतर)

933

989

785

786

787

805

810

809

807

808

813

814

816

817

818

837

838

836

835

838

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6.7

00 05

00 09

00 13

00 04 38

00 11

00 04

00 07

00 05

00 08

38 00

72 00 02

00 02

08 00 01

00 20

00 16

00 02

00 15

गट नंबर 838 और

851 के बीच में

00 16

बाहें तरफ का माला

851

602

397

576

00 47

00 38

00 09

00 06

गट नंबर 576 और

593 के बीच की

00 : 01 [PART II Suc, 3 (日)】 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

6950

राज्य : महाराष्ट

जिला: पुणे

तालूका: पुरदर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर एयर

कम सं.

उप-अण्ड सं.

6 7.

593

जेजुर (निरंतर)

574

00 12

573

00 23

गट नंबर 573 और गाँव सीमा पिंपरे बुदूक के बीच में नीरा नदी

04 74 43

कुल :

[फा. सं. आर-31015/ 25/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th October, 2004

S. O. 2676. Whereas it appears to the Central Govemment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Andwhereas, it appears to the Central Govemment that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Rightof User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority, Mumbai- Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan. Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka , Pune District , Maharashtra -412 201 6951

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii)]

SCHEDULE

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 1

SONORI

215

150

149

143

145

146

679

705

232

233

242

243

244

245

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

8 5

32 86

87 02

17 35

43 68

00 09 36

00 34 39

05 05

00 29 56

00 19 70

03 10

26 42

32 53

00 15 11

00 08

10 90

24 61

22 75

19 98

20 96

10 96

11 31

00 12 81

26 07

08 38

CartTrack in

between Gat No

245 & 248

248

276

279

275

251

252( P)

253(P)

254(P)

00 81

16 73

00 01 41

60 51

09 74

00 05 86

00 04 75

12 92

Metalled Road in

GatNo 254(P)

255(P)

0015 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

6952

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 2

256

257 SONORI (Cold.)

258

259

260

Area

Sq.mt Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare

7 8

06 71

08 95

00 05 05

00 39 98

02 93

MudRoad

adjacenttoGat

No 260 & 370

370

392

28 14

54 36

Nala inGat

No392

399

18 2

VANPURI

373

372

371

00 09 48

09 61

66 85

Total:

11 36

64 01

00 07 67

00 08 30

Area in between

04 26

GatNo

371& 368

368

361

360

356

355

353

08 41

00 02 73

00 06 07

03 38

00 03 78

00 11

SH-63 in Gat

No 353

00 03

04 93

Metalled Road in

between GatNo

353 & 352

352

350

340

341

342

11 13

00 15

00 35

02 07

06 60

00 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ फल II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State :MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 1

343

344 VANPURI (Contd.)

345

346

347

348

349

108 3 KUMBHARVALAN

108

Area in between

GatNo 108 B/10 & 111 Area in between GatNo 108 B/10 & 111

111

112

113

118

120

119

121

122

130

133

26 Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

00 08 22

05 24

00 10 04

00 02 18

00 03 59

04 84

07 04

16 36 Total: 02

00 00 87 A/4

07 78

A/5

14 13

A/6

05 61 A/7

00 05 00 B/4

00 13 69 B/5

80 B/6

00 08 80 B/7

63 B/8

0029

00 18

B/10

07 92

08 71

33 12

00 11 92

06 96

18 40

00 23 24

00 02

00 08 66

00 10 40

06 00

00 18 10

00 31

16 74

19 17

00 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

6954

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: PUNE

Taluka: PURANDHAR

Area

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

Hectare

KUMBHARVALAN

(Contd.)

MDR - 31 in

between Gat No

26& 21

00 07

17 90

00 08 42

00 03 77

0000 90

12 31

00 00

00 12 59

46 08

04 25

Karha River

adjacentto

GatNo 2

43 10

Total: 04

KHALAD

Karha River in between V.B. of Kumbharvalan & Gat No 1180

20 74

1180

01 35

1181

00 14

1182

27 63

1183

00 01 53

1184

05 80

1185

19 54

1187

03 64

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

1187 & 1317

1317

00 58 80

Nala in Gat

02 38

No1318

00 21 78

1318

00 10 42

1319

16 08

1348

02 11

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

1348& 1333

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6955

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

Taluka : PURANDHAR

District : PUNE

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 4

KHALAD

1333 (Contd.)

1334

1335

1336

1347

1344

Nala in Gat No 1344

1376

1378

1379

1380

1382

1383

1384

1398

1397

1395

1396

1394

SH -64 in

between Gat No

1396& 876

876

874

872

870

868

867

Nala in between

GatNo

867& 735

735

733

732

726

725

724

723 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

00 07 60

00 02 95

00 01 88

00 04 13

00 09 29

00 23 43

00 03 86

00 03 42

00 03 97

00 03 79

00 07 55

13 02

00 07

00 05 21

0008

00 10 36

00 17 24

00 04 67

00 08 34

00 05 36

00 11 39

00 07 31

15 28

00 12 40

00 09 73

00 28 64

04 29

00 40 14

00 06 97

00 26 45

07 14

00 11

00 01 65

04 72

00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

6956

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] State: MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

722 KHALAD

721 (Contd.).

720

719

718

717

716

715

714

713

712

711

710

1034 5

SHIVARI

1035

Area

Sq.mt

Are

Sub-Division No.

Hectare

7 8

10 08

08 13

03 84

00 04

00 12

00 02 21

06 65 69 Total:

い

00 03

Area in between

GatNo

1035 & 1036

1036

1037

1038

1040

1044

1051

1052

1053

1054

1055

1056

08 31

00 21

01 99

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

1056& 955

955

956

954

949

948

00 23

08 41

00 6957 [ भाग - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004 /कार्तिक 1,1926

Taluka : PURANDHAR

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Area

Sub -Division

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

No.

Are Sq.mt Narmeofthe Village

Hectare 2

6 7 8 5

940

06 78

00 03 71

941

SHIVARI (Cond.)

942

00 03 90

943

01 10

944

00 15 90

945

00 18

930

01 42

946

00 06 55

929

00 80

928

16 10

926

00 25 37

859

21 25

858

00 07 29

855

00 08 95

854

00 08 36

850(P)

Area in between

00 04 58

GatNo 850(P)& 833

00 34 03

833

847

00 08 36

27 61

834

Area in between

00 05 00

GatNo

834& 837

20 60

837

00 12 08

828

00 09 81

827

00 04 58

648

00 02

647

00 04 69

646

06 22

644

00 09 93

642

00 06 52

641

00 04 46

639

00 03 68

637(P)

636

00 05 21

635

00 03 74

634

00 04 74

632 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

6958

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

631 SHIVARI

630 (Contd.)

629

628

627

626

621

981

592 PANGARE

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

0005

04 96

19 88

00 35 37

63 32

Total:

18 28

Nala in between

GatNo

592& 593

593

-00

Asphalted Road

inGatNo

593 & 671

671

679

678

00 54 89

46 06

Metalled Road in

01 72

GatNo 678

672

669

668

667

653

654

655

656

657

22 69

00 10

08 26

00 10 74

18 76

04 27

00 08 95

23 61

02 28

Asphalted Road

in Gat No 657

638

00 15

00 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6959

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

Taluka: PURANDHAR

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: PUNE

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 6 PANGARE

639

641 (Contd.)

640

631

633

632

630

733

734

726

774

773

765

771

770

777

MDR-60in

between Gat No

777 & 782

782

778

779

780

892

893

896

Metalled Road in

GatNo 908

908

909

906

907

925

930

929

927

928

Area

Sub -Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

00 23 85

00 10

00 00 39

10 34

16 14

00 22 41

00 03 76

00 12 71

00 13 16

00 04 91

00 12 37

00 21 70

10 11

02 71

00 15 78

02 41

07 34

00 10 59

00 03 91

00 07 20

00 02 37

28 81

00 04 38

00 00 45

01 99

00 04 58

00 07 45

05 51

00 03 80

00 06 54

43 34 Total : 06 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

6960

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ) State: MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

PARINCHE

Area

Sq.mt

Are

Sub-Division No.

Hectare

7 8 5

01 32

Asphalted Road

inGat No 2168

2168

17 56

MajorDistrict

Road-60 in

between Gat No

2168& 2172

2172

Nala in between

GatNo

2172& 2207

2207

2206

2210

2211

2212

2219

2220

2221

2223

2224

2227

2228

2229

2237

2238

2239

2240

2255

2250

2254

2252

2253

2286

2288

2287

2289

04 28

09 95

05 00

07 96

07 33

06 02

20 60

12 31

00 15

18 29

20 23

04 95

25 10

25 54

12 15

10 38

09 83

00 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Are Sq.mt

Sub-Division No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Name of the Village

25 71

2311

7 PARINCHE

10 54

2312

(Contd .)

2306

2304

2303

15 51

2301

Area in between

00 08

GatNo

2301 & 2378

06 03

2378

06 22

2379

10 94

2380

05 38

2381

00 15

2382

29 96

2377

2400

27 19

2399

2442

2439

14 83

2438

21 25

2437

2571

09 12

2577

05 87

2578

37 48

2573

2643

00 53

2642

17 22

2624

2625

03 60

2626

02 93

2641

02 39

.00

2627

07 97

2640

2628

2629

2639

Area in between

04 37

GatNo

2639& 2638

2638

3050 G1/04-19A 6962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] Taluka PURANDHAR

District: PUNE

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Sr. No.

Survey No.

Nameofthe Village

Sub -Division No.

Are

Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 7 PARINCHE

2637

00. 07 00 (Contd .)

00 07 58

2636

00 09 49

2632

00 12 94

2635

Nala in Gat No 2635

02 84

2754

39 98

2724

00 09 17

2730

00 18 62

2732

00 00 03

2731

00 15 78

2733

00 05 39

2729

00 14 24

2728

04 11

3065

00 55 24

3064

3063

00 21

3062

3061

3060

00 03 97

3059

00 04 65

3058

00 02 11

3057

00 03 26

3056

00 06 50

3055

00 05 56

3054

00 01 63

3097

00 28 91

Carttrack in

between Gat No

00 05 87

3097 & 3095

00 03 07

3095

3096

61 33

3104

16 99

3106

00 13 54

3104

98 08

3109

3110

00 14 60

3111

00 01 58

Total: 13

32 75

3050 Gl/04-19B 6963

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

195(P) 8

HARNI

Area

Sq.mt

Are

Sub -Division No.

Hectare

7 8 5

35 99

01 37

Asphalted Road

in Gat No 195( P)

194

193

192

166

165

164

163

168

162

153

147

148

00 32 66

02 64

21 02

14 91

03 12

02 20

Asphalted Road

inGat No 80

951

949

18 05

01 26

00 17

02 05

06 50

10 23

10 64

00 09 16

02 97

Asphalted Road

in between Gat

No 949 & 938

938

935

03 24

00 6964

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23, 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Taiuka: PURANDHAR

District: PUNE

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area Sr. No.

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Nameofthe Village

Sub -Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

8 8

HARNI

934

00 06 06

946

00 00 45 (Contd.)

924

00 04 79

921(P)

02 97

925

00 02 05

918

00 02 93

917

00 01 53

916

00 02 13

915

00 01 83

914

00 03 81

891

00 00 05

890

00 03 03

889

00 05 79

888

00 04 79

903

00 03 59

Area in between

GatNo

00 05

903& 904

902

901

00 00 14

904

00 00 06

900

00 01 34

899

00 01 46

898

00 01 48

897

00 03 59

894

00 00 06

895

00 04 39

602

00 06 07

603

00 07 00

607

00 04 05

604

00 09 42

605

00 08 52

822

00 19 28

818

00 08 13

819

00 18 69

820

00 01 10

807

00 00 87

806

00 06 90

CartTrack in

between Gat No

00 12 92

806& 961

6965

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Viilage

4 2

961 HARNI

962 (Contd.)

963

964

802

803

804

662

678

679

680

681

682

683

712

711

716

719

718

720

722

723

760

762

759

758

1783 9

VIR

1782

1787

1786

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

00 16

00 40

01 04

03 65

07 77

03 92

03 10

09 31

00 55

00 01 18

04 79

02 76

07 21

00 03 17

00 06 64

06 80

00 19 40

18 96

00 02

03 15

00 56

15 58

00 31

00 26 61

05 20

03 69

Total

00 10 37

14 20

04 63

Area in between

GatNo

16.

1786 & 1785

Area in between

GatNo

1797 & 1785

1798

1799

01 85

02 95

00 6966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka: PURANDHAR

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

District : PUNE

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 9

VIR

1803 (Contd.)

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

02 71

Area in between

GatNo

00 02 29

1803 & 1804

1804

1809

1808

1807

1806

00 03 68

00 03 28

00 02 25

01 21

00 00 25

Area in between

GatNo

00 16 48

1806& 1850

1850

1845

1846

1844

00 05 21

00 18 23

00 00 12

00 12 61

Area in between

GatNo

00 12 96

1844 &1833

1833

1828

2016

2017

2023

00 18 16

00 00 17

00 12 23

00 16 21

00 11 51

MDR - 63 inGat

No 2051

2051

2032

2031

2030

2029

2028

2024

2026

2025

2122

00 01 93

00 46 62

00 00 95

00 01 45

00 04 46

00 01 64

00 05 64

00 20 98

00 02 96

00 09 90

33 52

03 15 00 Total:

6967

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District: PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sq.mt

Sub-Division No.

Are Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

Hectare

1606

MANDKI

57 85

00.

1628

00 61 59

1547

05 80

1480

17 57

1479

08 41

1478

11 17

1477

11 82

1476

05 06

Metalled Road in between Gat No

1476 & 1266

00 16 06

1266

00 03

1265

03 79

1264

04 18

1917

1263

00 15

1262

13 92

1261

00 02 76

1298

04 30

1260

04 01

1299

00 40

1306

00 01 88

1307

04 98

1308

07 67

1309

13 60

1310

1311

00 52

1317

00 19

1312

1316

04 90

1315

Nala in between

06 05

GatNo

1315 & 897

25 93

897

11 83

898

09 97

849 6968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Taluka : PURANDHAR

District : PUNE

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Name ofthe Village

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 10

848

00 09 45 MANDKI (Conta)

847

00 04 98

846

00 09 24

00 05 51

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

906&908

840

00 04

905

00 00 05

906

00 00 64

00 23 76

908

921

00 11 22

922

00 11 85

00 28 49

923

926

00 20 71

00 00 05

929

00 06 29

930

00 05

931

735

38 14

00 00 40

932

933

15 48

934

00 05 94

10 03

935

00 03 98

936

00 06 28

938

939

26 49

00 07 85

940

Nala in between

04 61

GatNo 940

&V.B. ofJeur

33 85

Total: 06 6969

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District: PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

Area

Sq.mt

Are

Sub -Division No.

Hectare

Nala in between

JEUR

00 09

GatNo 1148

&V.B. ofMandki

1148

1129

1128

1127

1125

1124

1123

1122

1120

01 30

01 17

CartTrack in Gat

No 1121

1119

1118

1117

02 54

00 04

Area in between

GatNo

00 24

1117 & 1116

1116

1006

1000

997

999

995

991

992

988

985

984

983

11 39

05 22

00 71

05 66

01 23

00 96

00 6970

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka: PURANDHAR

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

District: PUNE

Sr. No.

GatNo.

Survey No.

Nameofthe Village

4 11

JEUR

982

934

933

989

785

786

787

805

810

809

807

808

813

814

816

817

818

837

838

836

835

838 State: MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt Hectare

00 05 19

00 09 96

00 13 72

00 15 67

00 06 00

00 04 38

00 11 72

00 07 76

00 00 05

00 05 67

00 08 87

7 00 03 38

00 02 72

00 02 41

00 01 08

00 03 51

00 20 52

00 16 59

00 02 28

00 15 60

Nira Left Bank

Canal in between

GatNo 00 16 30

838& 851

851

602

397

576 00 47 51

00 38 87

00 09 25

00 06 83

Area in between

GatNo 00 01 90

576& 593

6971 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक1,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: PUNE

Taluka : PURANDHAR

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sq.mt

Sub - Division No.

Are Sr. No.

Hectare

Nameofthe Village

7. 8

593

29 JEUR (Contd.)

574

12 16

00 23

573 Nira River in between Gat No 573& V.B. of PimpreBudruk

Total:

[No. R-31015/25 /2004- O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2677.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के भीतरपाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम . वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते), हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, लोनी - टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका, पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 6972

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

अनुसूची

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

निमणी

134

135

449

475

476

448 उप-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

67 8

00 49

06 01

00 37 94

23 00

00 03

गट नंबर 448 और

00 04 21

477के बीच का नाला

477

497

496

479

10 10

14 19

00 13

गट नंबर 479 और

493 के बीच का

00 02

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

493

492

491

490

489

488

487

486

485

00 07 77

03 68

03 83

गट नंबर 485 और

गाँव सीमा तांसगांव के

बीच में येरला नदी

नेहरुनगर

78 64

31 16

गट नंबर 58 में

00 03

राज्य मार्ग 75

00 18

00 36 10

गट नंबर 67 और 29

00 01

के बीच का नाला

00 02 57 6973

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

00 01

गट नंबर 29 और 30

के बीच का नाला

नेहरूनगर (निरंतर)

06 50

17 41

00 11

00 09

गट नंबर 26 में का

02 35

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

5 3

तासगांव

सर्वे नंबर 692 और निमणी गाँव सीमा के बीच में येरला नदी

692

968

961

704

693

694

695

698

629

687

686

642

643

644

646

622

621

620

619

618

00 15

06 74

79 59

कुल:

00 09

00 53

00 30

00 01

00 23 98

00 11

00 32

00 31

00 32

00 23

00 11

00 18 6974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

तालुका : तासगांव

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) )

जिला : सांगली

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गंट नंबर

कम सं.

4 3

तासगांव

सर्वे नंबर 618 और

611 के बीच का

( निरेतर )

मेटल्ड रोड

611

612

सर्वे नंबर 612 और

549 के बीच का

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

549

545

सर्वे नंबर 545 में गाडी रस्ता

545

540

538

536

537

527

सर्वे नंबर 527 और

441के बीच का

गाडी रस्ता

442

441

437

438

440

439

447

सर्वे नंबर 432 में नाला

432

451

452

450

459

462

सर्वे नंबर 459 में

का गाड़ी रस्ता

460

उप-खण्ड सं .

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

6 7

00 03 54

00 41 37

00 22 26

00 02 31

00 20 88

00 21 45

00 10 13

00 32 12

00.17 46

00.40 71

00 41 13

00 34 68

00 02 51

00 10 60

00 04 09

00 00 14

00 02 69

00 07 81

00 24 46 12

00 14 21

00 01 80

00 15 74

00 09 17

00 30 66

00 01 57

00 44 49

00 05 27

00 00 91

00 32 36 6975

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

सर्वे नंबर 460 और

तासगांव

394के बीच में का

(निरेतर )

गाड़ी रास्ता

394

सर्वे नंबर 393 और

394 के बीच में का

राज्य मार्ग 10

393

371

392

सर्वे नंबर 392 और

386 के बीच में का

गाड़ी रहस्ता

388

386

384

382

381

320

321

सर्वे नंबर 321 में नाला

315

313

314

सर्वे नंबर 314 और

273 के बीच में का

ग्राम रस्ता

273

274

275

276

279

192

सर्वे नंबर 192 में

का गाडी रस्ता

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं .

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7 8 5

00 03

00 04 68

00 21 01

00 32 70

30 89

00 03 19

12 30

00 27

46 25

00 03 41

00 04

00 27

00 28

00 02

15 49

00 50 24

00 41

00 43

00 84 03

00 44

00 00 64 6976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

गाव का नाम

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 3

सर्वे नंबर 192 और

तासगांव (निरंतर) 193 के बीच में का राज्य मार्ग नं . 136

193

सर्वे नंबर 193 और

185 के बीच में

का ड्रेन

185

चिंचणी

538

537

536

540

535

544

548

547

551

553

552 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं .

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 7 8 5

00 03

00 07 89

00 02

00 30

कुल:

00 22 06

00 26 77

00 00 27

00 04 99

00 17 56

00 37 54

00 01 21

00 30

गट नंबर 314 और

552 और 577 के

00 03

बीच रस्ता

577

576

615

617

600

623

22 76

00 13

22 36

00 27 31

00 15

00 37

गट नंबर 623 और

658 के बीच में का

00 02

गाडी रसस्ता

658

658 1

53 86

00 21 97

गट नंबर 658/2

और 654 के बीच

00 02

का अस्फालटेड रस्ता

654

00 21 94 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

6977

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

चिंचणी

764 4

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7

00 11

गट नंबर 764 और

भैरेवाडी गाँव सीमा के

00 02

बीच में का डेन

गट नंबर 863 और

भैरेवाडी गाँव सीमा के

बीच में कापुर नाला

863

849

850

864

35 83

05 12

00 00

08 89

गट नंबर 864 और

00 01 90

904 के बीच में प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 34

904

902

903

901

900

1002

1003

1044

1043

1009

1010

1042

1011

गट नंबर 1011

में कनाल

1020

1021

1022

1025

02 21

00 19 98

09 76

00 21

00 08 83

00 24

00 01

00 07 87

22 89

00 08

00 01 03

05 92

00 03

00 09 72

07 36 33 कुल:

गाँव सीमा चिंचणी और

00 03 15

गट नंबर 227 के बीच

भैरेवाडी

की भूमि

227

228

229 3050 G1/04-20A

00 01 82

00 11 51

00 18 17 6978

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1. 1926

जिला : साग तालुका : तासगाव

क्रम

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

सं.

4 2

215 5

214 भैरेवाडी (निरंतर )

211

212

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं .

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 7

00 11 02

00 31 82

गट नंबर 212 और

175 के बीच में

का

रस्ता

175

182

173

171

170

174

168 सावडे

255

254

253

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

263

277

276

278

279

00 01

00 32 06

00 08 67

09 42

00 05

04 50

00 10

01 73

कुल:

00 05

00 13

00 02

00 03

00 05

00 04

00 07

00 03

00 10

00 13

00 02 42

गट नंबर 279 और

00 02

280 के बीच में का

गाडी गुस्ता

280

00 34

गट नंबर 280 और

283 के बीच नाला

283

282

284

285

286

287

288

00 28

06 51

05 43

09 22

10 41

03 33

कुल:

3050 G1/04-20B 6979

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं .

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

36 लोढे

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

00 01

गट नंबर 36 और

सावर्डे गाँव सीमा के

बीच में का नाला

कौलगे

299 8

292

293

291

290

289

280

281

277

274

273

272

269

270

267

264

248

249

250

252

247

09 00 कुल: 00

03 02

08 61

00 08

00 02

00 14

00 10

00 04

00 05

00 04

00 01

00 11

00 06

00 04

00 14

00 01 53 3

00 12 86

गट नंबर 247/3

और 214 के बीच

काअस्फालटेड रास्ता

214

219

218

217

208

207

201

183

182

184

174

173

172

02 48

00 02

00 02 73

ब

00 01

00 23

45.

00 6980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1, 1926

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii)]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

उप-खण्ड सं .

कम सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

67 8 कौलगे

171

00 06 40

146

00 06 17

147

00 05

148

00 03 54

149

00 02 31

150

00 07 46

151

00 02 31

152

00 21 57

153

00 09

108

00 13 97

00 11

00 05 61

00 05 44

00 05 71

00 24 67

कुल: 03 61

गट नंबर 339से 366

वाघापुर

और कौलगे गाँव सीमा के

00 06 39

बीचमें का नाला

339 से 366

00 05 38

गट नंबर 339 से 366

और 369 के बीच में का

00 06

नाला

369

00 05 45

370

00 17 98

गट नं . 370/1 में

00 01 48

का मेटल्ड रस्ता

00 04 25

00 06 18

00 06 44

00 04 84

00 06 63

00 05

00 06

00 09 02

103

00 12 21

106

00 04 18

107

00 03 6981

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

108 9

वाघापुर

109 (निरंतर)

110

111

112

114

115

116

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

गट नं. 130 में का

मेटल्ड हस्ता

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

157 10

खुजगांव

156

155

154

153

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

00 03

03 36

00 00

04 61

00 09

00 03

04 73

14 89

00 03

00 02

00 03

00 04

00 05

00 02

02 20

00 02

00 07 56

11 56

02 69

कुल:

03 80

00 06 37

00 06

00 05

00 6982

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKΑ 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 10

152 खुजगांव

151 (निरंतर )

150

149

148

147

146

141

180

184

186 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं .

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर एयर

6 7

00 03

00 02 93

00 03 09

00 02

00 02 53

00.05

00 04 57

00 00 49

00 47 59

00 03

गट नं . 180 और 90

00 03

में का मेटल्ड स्ता

ब

00 02 96

00 06 57

00 04

गट नंबर 93 में का

नाला

106

104

105 बस्तवडे

816

00 01 71

00 26 95

00 29

00 10

02 93

कुल:

00 36 09

गट नं . 816 में का

03 57

मेटल्डरास्ता

812

810

773

774

763

762

757

758

759

760

756

785

786

787

788

00 36

00 00 22

00 30

00 18 75

00 17 10

00 19

00 01 61

00 01

00 06

00 14 85

10 30

00 05

00 05 6983

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

789 बस्तवडे

790 (निरंतर )

792 सावळज

290

294

291

292

302

315

316

सर्वे नं. 316 में का

मेटल्ड रास्ता

317

सर्वे नं. 317 में का

मेटल्ड हस्ता

सर्वे नंबर 121 और

317 के बीच का

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

122

120

121

सर्वे नंबर 120 और

104 के बीच की

अग्रणी नदी

104

सर्वे नं. 104 में का

गाडी गुस्ता

107

108

110

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं .

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7

20 88

कूल:

56 43

00 6984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23, 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

तालुका : तासगांव

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 12

सावळज

सर्वे नंबर 110 और

56 के बीच का

(निरंतर )

अस्फालटेड स्ता

सर्वे नं. 55 और 12

में का मेटल्ड हस्ता

सर्वे नंबर 19 और

555 के बीच में प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 34

555

554

532

533

538

539

544

540

541

542

उप-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

00 02 38

00 04

00 37

00 01 18

16 01

00 10

00 12 92

00 13 58 13+ 2अ

00 05

88 1 ब + 2 ब 00 13

00 18

00 25 65

50 3

00 06 90

39 2ब

55 23/2

00 02

1 अ

00 14

00 07 57

00 59

1अ+4ब+ 3 + 5

00 28

1 ब+2+431

00 25

12/3 + 13 क+

17 02

4/6+5/5

5/3+11+4/ 5 + 1

00 19

2/5

5/2+ 2+ 3+

80 4/1+6+7 + 8 + 1

00 95

00 14 31

36 23

1+ 2

00 34

3 + 4

18 6985

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

सावळज

543

(निरंतर )

543

सिध्देवाडी

808 13

डोंगरसोनी

996 14

1089

1088

1090

1087

1086

1084

1083

1082

1079

1080

1078

1112

1109

1110

1111

1118

1106

1103

1123

1124

1133

1132

1130

1129

1128

1170

1169

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

95 2

00 09

59 3

00 09

45 5

00 13

13 12

कुल:

00 19

कुल:

52 67

12 00

00 42 67

03 66

00 09

00 22

11 06

00 09

00 02

00 08

00 00

00 23

00 00 15

00 37

00 04 69

00 06

00 13

20 57

00 15 6986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 डोंगरसोनी

1168

1166

1159

1165

1164

1163

105

106

107

108

109

110

112

113

159

160

158

164

165

182

184

185

187

186 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 7

00 10

00 01 50

00 21 57

00 16

00 17

00 74 31

00 25

00 12

00 07 91

00 19 19

00 19

00 11 51

00 06 51

00 18 73

00 33

00 27 57

00 14 08

00 07

J0 04

00 04 77

गट नं . 187 में

का मेटल्ड सस्ता

189

190 दहिवडी

467

455

456

444

457

458

459

00 01

00 35

08 88

कुल:

00 22 50

00 11

00 22 78

06 18

00 15 51

00 12 99

00 00 6987

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं.

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

6 7

13 00

441

15 दहिवडी(निरंतर)

440

00 11

439

00 32

436

438

08 09

433

कुल:

823

जरंडी

00 05

कुल:

[फा. सं. आर-31015/26/2004- ओ.आर- ।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th October, 2004

S. O. 2677. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Rightof User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the landto Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority, Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka , Pune District , Maharashtra -412 201 6988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

Taluka : TASGAON

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 1

134 NIMANI

135

449

475

476

448

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 49 30

00 06 01

00 37 94

00 10 60

00 23 00

00 03 24

Nala in between

04 21

GatNo 448 & 477

477

497

496

479

00 10 10

00 14 19

00 13 53

00 02 73

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

479& 493

493

492

491

490

489

488

487

486

485

Yerla River in between Gat No 485 & V.B of Tasgaon 2 NEHRUNAGAR

00 07 77

00 08 34

00 03 43

00 13 57

00 03 68

00 03 83

00 07 61

00 14 61

14 48

00 09 38

02 78 64 Total:

31 16

SH - 75 in Gat

No 58

00 03 75

00 46 70

00 32 56

00 18 22

00 36 10

Nala in between

00 01 07

Gat No 67 & 29

00 02 57 6989

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

01 50

Nala in between

GatNo 29 & 30

NEHRUNAGAR (Contd.)

06 50

00 47

00 17

21 88

11 40

00 09 33

Asphalted Road in

02 35

Gat No 26

5 3

TASGAON

Yerla River in between Survey No 692& V.B of Nimni

692

968

961

704

693

694

695

698

629

687

686

642

643

644

646

622

621

620

619

618

00 15 20

14 68

02 79 59 Total:

00 38

00 53

00 30 34

00 01 23

00 23

00 03

00 23 98

11 85

00 32 88

00 31 34

00 32 79

00 02

00 25

23 41

00 11

00 20 94

00 18 88 6990

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka : TASGAON

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

TASGAON

Metalled Road in between Survey No

(Contd .)

618& 611

611

612

Asphalted Road in between Survey No

612& 549

549

545

CartTrack in Survey No 545

545

540

538

536

537

527

CartTrack in betweenSurvey

527 & 441

442

441

437

438

440

439

447

Nala in Survey

No 432

432

451

452

450

459

462

CartTrack in Survey No 459

460

State: MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 03 54

00 41 37

00 22 26

00 02 31

00 20 88

00 21 45

00 10 13

00 32 12

00 17 46

00 40 71

00 41 13

00 34 68

00 02

00 10 60

00 04 09

00 02 69

00 07 81

24 46

00 14 21

00 01 80

00 15 74

00 09 17

00 30 66

00 01 57

00 44 49

00 05 27

00 91

00 32 36 6991

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

TASGAON

(Contd.)

CartTrack in between Survey 460& 394

394

SH - 10 in between Survey No 393 &

394

393

371

392

CartTrack in between Survey No

392& 386

388

386

384

382

381

320

321

Nala in Survey

No 321

315

313

314

VillageRoad in between Survey No 314 & 273

273

274

275

276

279

192

CartTrack in Survey No 192

Area

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

Sub-Division No.

00 04

21 01

00 32 70

30 89

00 03

00 24

00 12 30

09 96

00 27 17

02 00

00 20

46 25

03 41

00 04 96

27 11

28 59

02 80

15 49

00 50 24

00 41 32

00 84 03

44 57

00 6992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1. 1926

Taluka : TASGAON

[ PART II-- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

District : SANGLI

Survey No. Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

3 3

TASGAON

SH - 136 in between Survey No

192& 193

193

Drain in between SurveyNo 193 & 185 185 4 CHINCHANI

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area Gat No.

Sub-Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt 4

00 03 43

00 07 89

00 02 44

00 30 83

15 01 90

Tatal:

538

00 22 06 537

00 26 77 536

00 06 37 540

00 00 27 535

00 04 99 544

00 17 56

548

15 26 547

00 38 86 551

00 37 54 553

00 01 21 552

00 30 09

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

00 03 76 552& 577

577

00 22 76 576

00 13 17 615

00 22 36 617

00 27 31 608

00 15 03 622

00 19 28 623

00 37 42

CartTrack in

between Gat No

02 75

623& 658

658

00 53 86

658

21 97

Asphalted Road in

between GatNo

00 02 79

658/2& 654

654

00 21 94 6993

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

764 4 CHINCHANI

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

11 86

Drain in between

(Contd.)

02 52

764 & V.B of

Bahirewadi

KapurNala in

between V.B of

08 26

Bahirewadi &

GatNo 863

863

849

850

864

35 83

00 05

00 08 89

MDR - 34 in

01 90

between Gat No

864 & 904

904

902

903

901

900

1002

1003

1044

1043

1009

1010

1042

1011

02 21

00 19 98

02 06

00 20 55

00 24

00 22

00 08 61

Unlined Canal Gat

No 1011

1020

1021

1022

1025

01 03

03 12

36 33

Total:

Area in between

5 BAHIREWADI

V.B.Of Chinchani

& Gat No 227

227

228

229 3050 G1/04-21A

00 18 6994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA I , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] Taluka : TASGAON

District : SANGLI

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

Sr. No.

Survey No.

Nameof the Village

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5 BAHIREWADI

215

00 11 02

214

00 13 49 (Contd.)

211

00 19 79

212

00 31 82

00 01 96

Road in between

GatNo 212 & 175

175

00 32 06

182

00 08 67

173

00 09 42

171

00 05 60

170

00 04 50

174

168

01 73 18

Total:

SAWARDE

255

00 26 70

254

00 25 27

253

00 05 03

256

00 13 07

257

00 02

258

00 03

259

00 05 04

260

00 04 04

261

00 07 81

262

00 03 90

263

00 10 01

277

00 13 19

276

00 02 42

278

00 01 92

279

00 05 96

CartTrack in

between Gat No

02 10

279& 280

280

00 34 28

00 04 98

Nala in between

GatNo 280 & 283

283

00 28 09

282

00 06 51

284

00 05 43

285

00 03 29

286

00 09 22

287

00 10 41

288

00 09 28

03 33 99

Totas :

3050 G1/04-21B 6995

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

Gat No.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 1

36 7

LODE

Area

Sub - Division No.

Sq.mt

Hectare Are

7 8 5

01 80

00 07 20

Nala in between

Gat No 36 & V.B of

Sawarde

299 KAULGE

292

293

291

290

289

280

281

277

274

273

272

269

270

267

264

248

249

250

252

247

00 09 00 Total:

00 10 86

00 03 02

08 61

08 71

02 90

00 10 49

04 81

00 01 06

00 05

11 86

00 06 46

06 02

00 00 06

00 04 85

00 01 53

12 86

02 48

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

247/3& 214

214

219

218

217

208

207

201

183

182

184

174

173

172

00 02 48

00 02 06

03 29

16 40

4506

08 16

00 6996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] Taluka : TASGAON

District : SANGLI

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Name of the Village

7 8

00 06 40

171

8 KAULGE (Contd.)

00 06 17

146

147

00 05 16

148

00 03 54

00 02 31

149

07 46

150

00 02 31

151

00 21 57

152

00 09 80

153

00 13 97

108

00 11 34

00 05 61

05 44

05 71

24 67

03 61 95

Total:

9 VAGHAPUR

Nala in between

00 06 39

V.B ofKaulge&

GatNo 339 to 366

00 05 38

339 to 366

06 44

Nala in between

339 to 366 & 369

00 05 45

369

370

17 98

00 01 48

Metalled Road in

Gat No 370/1

00 04 61

00 04 25

00 06 18

00 06 44

00 04 84

00 06 63

05 66

00 06 07

09 02

00 12 21

103

00 04 18

106

107

00 03 29 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6997

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

Taluka : TASGAON

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

108 9 VAGHAPUR

109 (Contd.)

110

111

112

114

115

116

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

Metalled Road in

GatNo 130

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145 10 KHUJGAON

157

156

155

154

153

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8 5

00 03 84

00 03 17

00 03 19

00 03

00 03 12

03 67

00 03 36

00 00 98

00 02 66

00 04 61

09 85

02 48

03 30

03 19

00 02 92

06 42

00 04 73

14 89

03 48

00 03 37

00 02 26

02 82

02 01

03 37

00 04 88

00 05 04

02 97

02 20

00 02 88

00 07 56

00 04 29

00 03 93

00 06 08

02 69 09 Tatal:

00 03 80

06 37

00 06 43

00 05 65

00 06 12 6998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka : TASGAON

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 10 KHUJGAON

152

151 (Contd.)

150

149

148

147

146

141

180

184

186

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8 5

00 03 11

03 55

00 02 93

00 03 09

00 02 93

00 02 53

05 29

00 04 57

00 00 49

00 47 59

00 03 19

03 24

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

186& 90

00 02 96

00 06 57

00 04 49

00 01 71

Nala in Gat No 93

106

104

105 11

816 BASTAWADE

00 26 95

00 29 94

00 38 45

00 10 51

00 15 82

02 93 54 Total:

00 36 09

Metalled Road in

00 03 57

GatNo 816

812

810

773

774

763

762

757

758

759

760

756

785

786

787

788

00 36 44

00 00 22

30 26

00 28 85

17 10

00 19 44

01 61

01 75

00 06 75

00 14 85

00 10 30

00 05 95

10 70.

35 6999

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 2

789 11 BASTAWADE

790 (Contd.)

792

290

SAWLAJ

294

291

292

302

315

316

Metalled Road in Survey No 316

317

Metalled Road in Survey No 317

Asphalted Road in between Survey No 121 & 317

122

120

121

AgranNadi in between Survey No 120& 104

104

CartTrack in Survey No 104

107

108

110

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

00 05

00 20 88

78 46 Total: 02

27 00

45 90

43 30

27 79

12 60

14 22

13 50

00 19 80 4

02 25

23 64

05 33

03 01

67 73

53 83

13 56

03 52

09 90

07 65 2

04 15

00 00 56 43.

33 52 2

06 53

21 98

00 7000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1, 1926

Taluka : TASGAON

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

District : SANGLI

Sr. No.

Survey No.

GatNo.

Nameof the Village

4 12

SAWLAJ

Asphalted Road in between Survey No

(Conta)

110& 56

Metalled Road in between Survey No 55& 12

MDR- 34 in between Survey No

19& 555

555

554

532

533

538

539

544

540

541

542

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area Sub-Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

00 02 38

00 04 17

00 37 04

00 01 18

00 16 01

00 00 07

00 10 16

00 12 92

00 13 58 1A+2A

00 05 40 1B+2B

00 13 88

00 18 62 1

00 25 65 2

00 13 50 3

00 06 90

00 04 39

15 55

2A/2

02 70 1A

19 3

00 07 57

00 59 07 1A+4B +3 + 5+ 6 00 28 80 1B+2+4A 00 25 43 12/3+13B +4/

00 17 02 6+5/5

5/3+11 +4/5 +

00 19 80 12/5

5/2+2+ 3 +4/1

00 35 80 +6+7 +8 + 1

00 95 11

00 14 31

00 03 25

Q0 36 23 1+2

00 34 65 3+4

00 23 18 7001

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

543

12 SAWLAJ

543

808 SIDHEVADI

996 14 DONGAR SONI

1089

1088

1090

1087

1086

1084

1083

1082

1079

1080

1078

1112

1109

1110

1111

1118

1106

1103

1123

1124

1133

1132

1130

1129

1128

1170

1169

Area

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

Sub-Division No.

00 10 85 1

09 59

15 28

12 24

Total:

00 19 80

19 80

Total:

00 52 67

12 56

12 95

12 00

11 06

02 20

08 57

00 00 76

04 69

17 87

13 61

20 57

00 05

00 15 7002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka : TASGAON

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 14 DONGAR SONI

1168

1166 (Contd.)

1159

1165

1164

1163

105

106

107

108

109

110

112

113

159

160

158

164

165

182

184

185

187

186 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 12 83

00 10 80

00 01 50

00 21 57

00 16 70

00 17 27

00 74 31

00 25 96

00 25 52

00 12 06

00 07 91

00 19 19

00 19 41

11 51

00 06 51

00 18 73

00 33 38

00 27 57

00 00 07

07 74

00 15 66

00 04 77

Metalled Road in

00 04 25

GatNo 187

189

190 15

DAHIVADI

467

455

456

444

457

458

459

00 01 86

00 35 79

08 88 11 Total:

00 22 50

00 22 78

00 06 18

00 15 51

00 12 99

00 00 42 7003 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sub-Division No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Name of the Village

8 2

13 00

441

15 DAHIVADI (Contd.)

00 10 66

440

11 55

439

00 00 32

436

21 41

438

00 08 09

433

01 56 59

Total:

00.05 92 16

823

JARANDI

00 05 92

Total:

[No. R- 31015/26/2004-O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2678.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIΚΑ 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, लोनी - टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका , पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

आंधळी

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

गट नंबर 735 और

गाँव सीमा के बीच

00 11

में येरला नदी

735

736

738

739

740

716

741

742

745

715

714

749

711

710

709

708

36 33

00 16

00 07

00 10

00 16

00 25

00 08 70

00 20 27

00 07 77

गट नंबर 708 और

685 के बीच का

रास्ता

685

686

687

688

655

690

652

651

635

636

584

585

579

00 04

00 06

00 31

00 03 92 2

00 37

00 05

00 37

00 16

00 38

00 07

01 17

गट नंबर 579 और

02 11

577 के बीच का

गाड़ी रास्ता

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

7005

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 1

577 आंधळी (निरंतर)

578

327

328

329 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

उप -खण्ड

सं. हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 7

17 88

07 52

00 29 03

00 47

गट नंबर 329 में

रास्ता

00 03

गट नंबर 328 में

रास्ता

330

290

289

288

00 00 48

00 00 32

00 25 57

00 32 60

00 08 37

गट नंबर 288 और

115 के बीच का

05 02

गाड़ी रास्ता

115

122

116

119

121

218

217

215

214

213

181

182

208

207

00 20 28

00 05 78

00 15

00 28 62

00 11 47

28 93

00 37 00 1

00 09

00 27

00 11 70 2

00 11

32 53

00 26 49

गट नंबर 207 में

रास्ता

184

189

185

188

00 01 39

00 23

00 01

कुल: 10 7006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

मोराले

241

240

229

239

238

237

236

235

234

233

231

230 3

बांबवडे

1031

1032

1036

1037

1042

1041

1039

1040

1039 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 5

00 21

00 07

00 32 88

00 03

05 76

00 04

00 03

00 07

00 05

00 07 20

00 05 76

12 कुल: 01 08

17 04

00 52 90

00 23

00 11

00 01

00 24 46

00 18 28

गट नंबर 1040 और

08 61

1017 के बीच का प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 19

1017

1016

1014

1002

1001

998

999

997

996

995

994

983

1296

984

00 07

00 13

00 06 63

00 03 88

00 02

00 03

00 02

00 03

03 89

00 05

00 05 49

00 05 95

07 51

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7007

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

986 बांबवडे(निरंतर)

952

951

एयर वर्ग मीटर उप -खण्ड सं. हेक्टर

6 7

00 08 93

00 17 38

00 01 96

गट नंबर 951 में

950

949

948

947

946

गट नंबर 946 और

00 01 59

00 03

00 12 08

00 06

00 07

00 17

926 के बीच का

00 03

गाडी रास्ता

926

925

924

923

922

921

920

914

913

910

811

815

00 06

00 04

00 01

00 02

00 05

00 02 89 क

00 30

00 12

00 14 81

गट नंबर 815 और

816 के बीच का

00 02

गाडी रास्ता

816

817

819

803

800

802

801

795

796

1291

790

00 06

10 35

00 04 50

00 01 57

00 02

00 01

00 05

00 06

00 06 7008

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

जिला : सांगली

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र पलुस

तालूका :

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 3

बांबवडे

789

00 07 10

761

00 16

(निरंतर)

गट नंबर 761 में

00 03

राज्य मार्ग नंबर 75

06 75

758

00 04 50

756

00 03

755

00 13 50

754

00 27

740

00 10 42

739

00 24

737

10 39

735

00 05 79

734

733

00 05 41

731

00 02 25

730

02 06

729

00 04

573

गट नंबर 573 और

00 02

502के बीच का नाला

00 04

502

00 07 89

501

00 05

500

00 05

499

00 14

498

494

495

00 02

498

496

497

00 09 78

1289

513

00 15 91

514

00 05 07

06 81

515

05 41

516

00 04 57

517

00 02

518

गट नंबर 518 और

00 04

422के बीच का रास्ता

422

00 04 16

421

00 05

420

00 03 65 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7009

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

बांबवडे

419

417 (निरंतर )

416

424

425

426

427

428

405

391

408

412

409

410

407

999 येळावी

1598

1599

1600

1607

1606

1604

1603

1646

1645

1644

1643

1675

1688

1640

1692

1693

1710 3050 G1/04-22A

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

00.01

00 05 68

00 02 25

00 06

00 02 46

00 02

00 13

10 15

08 46

कुल:

00 02

10 84

00 04

00 09

16 22

14 01

अ

00 11 98

00 32

00 13

70 7010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKΑ 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

= राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

1709

1708 येळावी (निरंतर )

1707

1733

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 5

32 26

00 11

00 53

40 01

गट नंबर 1733 और

00.01 81

1946 के बीच कां

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

1946

1953

1952

1946

1960

1949

1969

1968

1967

1966

1973

1975

1978

1977

1980

1981

2056

2057

00 27

00 04

00 06

00 04

00 06

00 09

00 01

08 52

00 14

00 05 81

06 81

00 11

गट नंबर 2057 और

2060 के बीच का

00 03

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

2059

2060

2061

00 03

00 09

गट नंबर 2061 और

2063 के बीच का

गाड़ी रास्ता

2063

2064

2065

00 12

00 97

06 31

3050 G1/04-22B 7011

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

येळावी

2066

2047 (निरंतर )

2046

2044

2042

2041

2235

2236

2260

2256

2258

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

11 63

10 33

05 88

00 02

00 03

00 21

00 11

00 14 12

गट नंबर 2258 और

00 04

02 61

00 03 55 7012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKΑ 1 , 1926

[ PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

उप-खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

येळावी

45 (निरंतर )

291

290 हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

6 7 8

00 02 70

00 06

00 39 49

00 34 07

00 81 41

05 02

गट नंबर 290 और

285 के बीच का रास्ता

285

284

283

282

281

280

279

278

277

276

275

274

273

272

271

270

266

265

264

263

262

261

260

259

258

256

257

00 41 17

00 09 01

00 0.5 48

00 04

00 05

00 09

00 03

00 06

00 02

03 19

00 02

00 04

05 82

00 10

00 05

06 55

00 08

08 79

00 09

00 10 26

00 09 70

00 09

गट नंबर 257 में

गाड़ी रास्ता

हजारवाडी

11 33 36 कुल:

17 96

00 49 24 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7013

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर एयर

उप -खण्ड सं.

8 5

6 7

गट नंबर 6 में

हजारवाडी

मेटल्ड रास्ता

(निरंतर )

00 25 50

00 10

गट नंबर 27 और

02 39

129 के बीच का राज्य

मार्ग 136

129

128

132

134

135

136

137

141

00 09

00 10

00 06

00 03

गट नंबर 141 और

00 01

137 के बीच का नाला

137

136

135

134

133

128

00 07

00 03 61

00 09

00 21 86

00 18

गट नंबर 125 में

00 04

का नाला

125

123

121

120

00 09 12

00 03

गट नंबर 120 और

119 के बीच का राज्य

00 02

मार्ग 136

119

116

115 अ

00 00 71 अ

00 36 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 7014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : पलुस

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर मीटर

वर्ग

हेक्टर

सं.

कम सं.

07-

ब

115

गट नंबर 115 /ब में

02 82

हजारवाडी (निरंतर )

मेटल्ड रास्ता

गट नंबर 114 में

00 00

मेटल्ड रास्ता

07 80

00 08 75

00 48

00 14

00 07

कुल:

वसगडे

153

00 51

कुल:

[फा. सं. आर-31015/27/2004- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th October , 2004

S. O. 2678.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

7015

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority , Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka , Pune District, Maharashtra-412 201

SCHEDULE

Taluka : PALUS

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

f: No.

Name of the Village

4 1

ANDHALI

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

Yerla River in

between Gat No 735

& V.B

735

736

738

739

740

716

741

742

745

715

714

749

711

710

709

708

36 33

00 07

16 01

00 07 64

00 10

10 11

08 52

16 69

25 94

08 70

00 81

00 54 03

00 10 54

00 20 27

07 77

00 04 64

Metailed Road in

between Gat No

708 & 685

685

686

687

688

655

690

052

651

635

636

584

585

579

06 17

00 31 20

00 03 92

37 22 2

00 05 20

00 37 06

00 20 41

16 32

00 38 29

05 15

07 08

14 74

01 17

CartTrack in

between Gat No

579& 577

7016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka PALUS

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 2

577 1 ANDHALI ( Contd .)

578

327

328

329

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8. 5

17 88

07 52

00 00 01

00 29 03

00 47 36

Metalled Road in

0003

Gat No 329

Metalled Road in

00 00 48

GatNo 328

330

290

289

288

00 00 32

25 57

00 32 60

00 08 37

05 02

CartTrack in

between Gat No

288& 115

115

122

116

119

121

218

217

215

214

213

181

182

208

207

20 28

05 78

26 97

15 83

00 28 62

28 93

37 00

09 87

27 17

00 11 70 1

00 66 2

11 50

00 32 53

00 10 82

00 26 49

Metalled Road in

00 01- 39

GatNo 207

184

189

185

188

00 23 17

00 01 30

00 01 17

32 63

10 09

Total:

7017

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : PALUS

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

241 MORALE

240

229

239

238

237

236

235

234

233

231

230

1031 3 BAMBAVADE

1032

1036

1037

1042

1041

1039

1040

1039

Area

Sub - Division

Sq.mt

Are

No.

Hectare

05 76

05 04

00 07

08 12

Total:

00 25 22

00 17 04

52 90

01 48

24 46

MDR - 19 in

between Gat No.

1040 & 1017

1017

1016

1014

1002

1001

998

999

997

996

995

994

983

1296

984

07 33

13 64

06 63

03 88

02 24

03 46

00 15

02 02

03 32

03 89

05 10

05 49

05 95

07 51

00 7018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Taluka : PALUS

District : SANGLI

State : MAHARASHTRA

Sub-Division

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

No.

Nameof the Village

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

986

08 93

952

$17 3 BAMBAVADE (Contd.)

951

01 96

Nala in Gat

01 59

No. 951

950

00 03 13

949

12 08

948

00 06 22

947

07 30

946

17 24

00 03 23

CartTrack in

between Gat No

946& 926

00 06

926

925

04 30

00 01

924

923

01 18

00 02 53

922

921

02 57

920

00 02 41

914

10 05

913

910

811

815

CartTrack in

between Gat No

815& 816

816

00 06 78

817

00 10 35

00 04 50

819

803

16 20

800

01 57

802

00 02 25

801

00 01 35

795

05 40

つつ

796

00 06 12

1291

00 06 11

790

00 06 07 7019

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : PALUS

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 2

789 3 BAMBAVADE

761 (Contd.)

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

7 8

SH - 75 in Gat

No 761

758

756

755

754

740

739

737

735

734

733

731

730

729

573

00 03 15

00 06 75

00 04 50

03 82

00 13 50

27 36

00 10 42

10 39

05 79

05 41

01 27

02 25

02 06

04 00

Nala in between

00 02 86

GatNo. 573 & 502

502

501

500

499

498

494

495

498

496

497

1289

513

514

515

516

517

518

04 42

07 89

05 48

05 82

14 31

00 00 17

04 98

02 81

02 92

00 04 61

09 78

15 91

05 07

06 81

05 41

00 04 57

02 07

04 07

Asphalted Road in

between GatNo

518& 422

422

421

420

00 04 16

00 05 75

00 03 65 7020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : PALUS

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

Survey No.

No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Name of the Village

7 8

419

BAMBAVADE

00 05 68

417

(Contd.)

00 02 25

416

06 90

424

00 02 46

425

00 02 20

426

00 49

427

00 00 05

428

00 14

405

02 23

391

00 16

408

00 00

412

13 56

409

06 50

410

00 01

407

00 10 15

999

46 44

Total:

1598

YELAVI

00 00 13

1599

09 22

1600

04 02

1607

04 37

1606

10 84

1604

04 85

1603

09 94

1646

16 22

1645

1644

1643

1675

32 63

1688

00 40

1640

00 13 95

1692

19 82

1693

00 70

1710 7021

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : PALUS

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 1

1709 4

1708 YELAVI (Conta)

1707

1733

Area

Sub -Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

00 32 26

11 73

00 53

40 01

01 81

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

1733 & 1946

1946

1953

1952

1946

1950

1949

1969

1968

1967

1966

1973

1975

1978

1977

1980

1981

2056

2057

00 27 50

06 93

04 87

08 02

00 06 17

00 09 92

01 20

65 03

00 08 52

00 14

03 48

05 81

06 81

00 05

11 91

03 07

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

2057 & 2060

2059

2060

2061

00 03 65

00 09 50

02 38

CartTrack in

between Gat No

2061 & 2063

2063

2064

2065

00 12 17

00 00 97

06 31

00 7022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIΚΑ 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : PALUS

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 1

2066 4

YELAVI

2047 (Contd .)

2046

2044

2042

2041

2235

2236

2260

2256

2258

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

00 05 85

0011

00 10 33

05 36

00 05 88

02 64

00 03

00 06 24

00 21

00 11 91

00 14

00 02 51

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

2258& 29

00 13 69

06 88

00 08 52

22 83

MudRoad in Gat

No 34

00 02 52

00 10 45

00 03 28

00 13 49

00 19 91

00 00 13

00 12 28

Asphalted Road in

00 43

GatNo 39

Asphalted Road in

04 17

GatNo 40

00 84

Asphalted Road in

00 08

GatNo 41

02 61

00 02 80

00 03 55 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7023

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : PALUS

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

44 4

45 YELAVI (Contd.)

291

290

Road in between GatNo 290 & 285

285

284

283

282

281

280

279

278

277

276

275

274

273

272

271

270

266

265

264

263

262

261

260

259

258

256

257

CartTrack in Gat No 257

5 HAZARWADI

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

02 70

06 15

00 06 45

34 07

00 81 41

05 02

00 02 57

00 41

00 09 01

00 05 48

00 04 63

05 23

00 05

09 08

00 03 07

00 03 92

03 44

04 04

06 64

02 85

00 02

03 19

04 82

00 05 82

00 10 55

00 05 63

00 06 55

08 80

00 08 79

00 09 56

00 10 26

00 09 70

09 84

00 00 39

11 33 36 Total:

00 17

00 49 24 7024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : PALUS

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 1

HAZARWADI

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

00 01 78

Metalled Road in

GatNo 6

(Contd.)

38 52

25 50

10 17

02 39

SH - 136 in

between Gat No

27 & 129

129

128

132

134

135

136

137

141

00 10

00 09 29

00 09 31

10 63

00 06 79

03 25

05 45

00 50

00 01 65

Nala in between

GatNo.141 & 137

137

136

135

134

133

128

07 39

03 61

09 31

21 86

18 38

00 41

Nala in Gat

No. 125

125

123

121

120

04 27

09 97

09 12

00 03 26

02 70

SH - 136 in

between Gat No

120& 119

119

116

115

42 30

00 71

36 36

A 7025 भारत का राज्पत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926,

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : PALUS

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Are Sq.mt

Sub-Division No.

Hectare

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

0007

115

5 HAZARWADI

Metalled Road.in

02 82

GatNo 115/B

Metalled Road in

00 16

GatNo 114

07 80

00 48 82

08 48

86 90

Total :

153

VASAGDE

00 51 23

Total:

[No. R- 31015/27/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2679.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम. वी . चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , लोनी टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका, पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

3050 G1/04-23A 7026

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii )]

अनुसूची

तालुका: हवेली

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

मट नंबर

कम सं.

उप-खण्ड से हेक्टर एथर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 7

1 कदमवाकवस्ती

173

174

गट नंबर 173 और

252के बीच में

00 06

राष्ट्रीय मार्ग नं . 9

252

00 41

गट नंबर 252 और

821 के बीच में

00 05 89

नेटल्ड रास्ता

00 11

821

00 12

820

00 07

819

818

00 03

817

818

00 05

804

00 04

810

00 09

806

808

00 11

807

768

764

00 04

769

00 05

771

772

00 07

00 02

773

00 12

849

00 19

760

00 16

758

00 09

615

00 08

614

00 06

613

00 06

606

00 06

605

00 09

602

00 13

599

00 05

598

00 12

597

00 06

590

कुल: 02 91

3050 G1/04-23B 7027

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

तालुका : हवेली

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टर

गट नंबर 2314 और

लोनी कालभोर

गाँव सीमा

कदमवाकवस्ती के बीच

में मेटल्ड रास्ता

2314

2315

2316

2317

2320

2339

2335

2336

2338

00 02

00 08

00 15

00 05

गट नंबर 2338

00 03

और 1747/26 के

बीच में नाला

नाला और गट नंबर

00 03

1747/26 के बीच

में अस्फालटेड रास्ता

1747

1789

1747

1790

1747

1791

00 05

00 16

00 04

गट नंबर 1791 के

पास में

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

गट नंबर 1699 का

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

1699

1696

1694

00 02

00 10

00 7028

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIKA1, 1926

तालुका: हवेली

[PART 11 SBC. 3(ii )} राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : पुण

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

2 लोनी कालभोर

1693 उप-खण्ड सं

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

00 40

गट नंबर 1693 और

(निरंतर)

1529 के बीच का

00 07

गाडी रास्ता

1529

1530

1528

1527

की भूमि

1525

1518

1517

1516

1513

1532

1504

1503

1506

1505

1502

1500

1499

1498

1497

1496

1494

01 88

00 02

02. 46

00 15

00 09

00 01

00 07

00 04

00 01

00 03

00 06

गट नंबर 1494 और

1487 ब के बीच की

भूमि

1487

00 04

ब

00 07 15 7029

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii)]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : पुण

तालुका: हवला

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

गट नंबर

गाय का नाम

सर्वे मंबर

कम सं.

1484 लोनी कालभोर

1482 ( निरंतर )

1480

1476

1475

1474

1473

1472

1471

1470

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7

8 5

00 04

00 05

02 01

00 02

00 04

00 01

00 10

गट नंबर 1470 और

1464 के बीच

की भूमि

गट नंबर 1470 और

1464 के बीच

की भूमि

1464

1463

00 03

गट नंबर 1463

00 02

और 1454 के

बीच की भूमि

1454

1452

1451

1449

1431

1430

1429

1428

1427

1426

1420

00 03

00 05

00 03

गट नंबर 1420 और

1411 के बीच

की भूमि

1411

1410

00 01

00 7030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

तालुका : हवेली

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

1400

1401 लोनी कालभोर (निरंतर )

उप-खण्ड सं

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 7

8 5

00:03

:

गट नंबर 1401 और

1409 के बीच

का निकामी कनाल

1409

1407

1406

1405

1202

00 06

00 03

00 04

00 12

गट नंबर 1202 और

1198 के बीच की

कनाल

1198

1197

1196

1194

1192

1191

1190

1188

1187

1186

1184

1180

1178

1177

1176

1175

1173

1169

1168

1167

1166

1165

1164

1163

00 14

00 07

00 06

00 04

00 05

00 07

00 06

00 05

00 04

00 03

00 07

00 01

00 05

00 07

00 32

गट नंबर 1163

00 04

में लाईन

7031

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खपत्र 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

तालुका : हवेली

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

6 7

00 42

1162

00 04

1060

00 13

1059

लोनी कालभोर (निरंतर)

00 06

1058

00 05

1057

00 08

1056

00 05

1055

1054

गट नंबर 1054

में नाला

गट नंबर 1053

में नाला

00 06

1053

00 32

1052

00 04

1072

00 01

1071

1162

09 63

00 02

1188

आळंदी

00 00

1187

म्हातोबाची

00 59

1124

00 44

1125

00 28

1123

00 29

1122

00 11

1147

00 12

1120

00 15

1100

00 09

1094

00 17

1091

1092

00 22

1090

00 27

1089

गट नंबर 1089 और

00 02

1084 के बीच में

मेटल्ड रास्ता

1084

1066

00 26

1065 7032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] तालुका: हवेली

जिला : पुणे

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

उप-खण्ड सं

कम सं.

एयर

हेक्टर

वर्ग मीटर 1

6 7

8 आळंदी

1026

00 83

22 म्हातोबाची

1054

00 13 93 (निरंतर)

1055

00 21

गट नंबर 1055 और

938 के बीच में रेल्वे

00 08

लाईन

938

00 16

843

01 40

937

00 93

07 22

कुल:

[फा. सं. आर-31015/24/2004- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th October, 2004

S. O. 2679.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Rightof User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority , Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka . Pune District , Maharashtra - 412 201 7033

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ⅱ) ]

SCHEDULE

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : HAVELI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 1

173 1 KADAM WAKWASTI

174

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mt Sub- Division No.

00 00 50

00 00 64

06 31

NH - 9 in

between Gat No

173 & 252

252

41 40

00 05

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

252& 821

821

820

819

818

817

816

804

810

806

808

807

768

764

769

771

772

773

849

760

758

615

614

613

606

605

602

599

598

597

590

11 70

00 07

00 05

00 03 60

04 50

00 09 45

00 08

00 11

04 92

07 55

16 20

09 00

00 08 80

06 33

09 40

91 80

Total:

7034

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23, 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka : HAVELI

District : PUNE

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

Are

Sub- Division No. Hectare Sq.mt 1

7 8 2 LONI KALBHOR

00 05 46

Metalled Road in between V.B. of Kadam Vakvasti & Gat No 2314

00 08 61

2314

00 02 25

2315

2316

02 88

00 00 26

2317

00 16 31

2320

2339

00 02 01

2335

08 47

00 15 76

2336

2338

00 05 05

00 03 36

Nala in between

GatNo 2338 &

1747/26

03 34

Asphalted Road in

between Nala &

GatNo 1747/26

1747

00 32 55

1789

00 05 30

03 58

1789

06 06

1747

06 79

1747

1790

04 58

1747

00 09 29

1791

04 98

00 00 98

Asphalted Road

adjacent to Gat No

1791

00 82

Asphalted Road in

GatNo 1699

1699

02 03

1696

10 54

11 68

1694 7035

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक1,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: PUNE

Taluka : HAVELI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

1693 2 LONI KALBHOR

( Contd.)

Area

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

Sub- Division No.

CartTrack in

between Gat No

1693 & 1529

1529

1530

1528

1527

00 02

Area in between

01 93

GatNo

1527

&1525

Area in between

GatNo

1527 & 1525

Area in between

GatNo

1527 & 1525

1525

1518

1517

1516

1513

1532

1504

1503

1506

1505

1502

1500

1499

1498

1497

1496

1494

Area in between GatNo 1494 & 1487 B

1487

.56

00 25

03 48

03 04

06 82

04 92

A 7036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Taluka : HAVELI

District: PUNE

State : MAHARASHTRA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

Sub- Division No. Hectare

Area Are Sq.mt 1

8 2 LONI KALBHOR

1484

04 50

1482

00 05 72 (Contd.)

1480

02 01

1476

03 24

1475

00 02 38

1474

03 10

1473

02 39

1472

04 59

1471

01 50

1470

10 50

Area in between

02 54

GatNo

1470 & 1764

Area in between

GatNo

00 01 38

1470 & 1764

1464

03 23

1463

03 42

Area in between

GatNo

02 04

1463 & 1454

1454

1452

00 03 42

1451

03 65

1449

00 06 41

1431

05 58

1430

03 91

1429

1428

03 20

1427

03 18

1426

03 08

1420

02 67

Area in between

GatNo

00 02

1420 & 1411

1411

01 67

1410

06 20 7037

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Taluka : HAVELI

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: PUNE

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 1

1400 2 LONI KALBHOR

1401 (Contd.)

Area

Hectare

Sq.mt

Are

Sub- Division No.

03 97

00 62

Canal( Disused) in

between Gat No

1401 & 1409

1409

1407

1406

1405

1202

06 91

03 43

04 85

08 83

12 47

Canal in between

GatNo

1202& 1198

1198

1197

1196

1194

1192

1191

1190

1188

1187

1186

1184

1180

1178

1177

1176

1175

1173

1169

1168

1167

1166

1165

1164

1163

00 14 01

06 73

04 68

04 65

04 20

04 89

05 01

04 41

07 02

06 03

06 47

05 31

03 88

03 47

07 15

Railway Line in

GatNo 1163

7038

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Taluka : HAVELI

District: PUNE

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

Sub- Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt 1

8 2 LONI KALBHOR

42 46

1162

1060

04 78 (Contd .)

1059

1058

1057

1056

05 71

1055

05 13

1054

Nala in Gat No 1054

07 94

Nala in Gat No 1053

06 12

1053

32 31

1052

1072

00 04 35

01 15

1071

1162

21 04

63 01 3

ALANDI

1188

02 70

1187

(MHATOBACHI )

00 59 65

1124

44 19

1125

1123

1122

1147.

12 64

1120

1100

1094

17 79

1091

00 02

1092

22 14

1090

27 16

1089

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

1089& 1084

1084

23 46

1066

26 43

1065 7039

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/ कार्तिक 1,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : HAVELI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 2

1026 ALANDI

1054 (MHATOBACHI)

1055 (Contd.)

Area

Hectare

Sq.mt

Are

Sub- Division No.

13 93

Railway Line in

between GatNo

1055 & 938

938

843

937

00 93

251 Total:

[No. R- 31015/24/2004-O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 13 अक्तूबर, 2004

क्र. आ. 2680.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, चलचित्र (प्रमाणन) नियम, 1983 के नियम-3 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम, 1952 ( 1952 का 37) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्रीमती शर्मिला टैगोर को 13 अक्तूबर 2004 से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो, केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के अध्यक्ष के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. - 809/10/2003- एफ( सी ) ] विश्वजीत सहाय, निदेशक

MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING

New Delhi , the 13th October, 2004

S. O. 2680.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 ( 37 of 1952 ) read with rule 3 of the Cinematograph ( Certification ) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Smt . Sharmila Tagore as Chairperson of the Central Board of Film Certification in an honorary capacity from 13th October , 2004 for a period of three years or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 809/10/2003 - F ( C) ] VISHVAJIT SAHAY, Director 7040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 2681.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, मै. हरियाणा मिनरल्स लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली -1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 100/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-9-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-29012/58/95- आई. आर ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 23rd September , 2004 S.O. 2681.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 100/95) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , New Delhi - las shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the managernent of M/ s. Haryana Minerais Ltd. and their workman , Which was received by the Centrai Government on 23-9-2004 .

[No. L -29012/58/ 95 - IR (M) ]

B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT , NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI S. S. BAL

1.D. No. 100/95

In the matter of dispute between :

Shri A. K. Dalui , Ex - Blaster,

Backside Mandi , Charkhi Dadri ,

C/o Shri B. S. Parabhakar , Distt. Bhiwani

Workman

Versus

The Managing Director ,

M/ s . Haryana Minerals Ltd. ,

Bara Khamba Road,

Arunachal Building, 703-704,

7th Floor,

New Delhi

........... Management

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] APPEARANCES : NONE FOR PARTIES .

AWARD

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 29012 /58 /95 - IR (Misc. ) dated 9/14-11-95 has referred the following industrial dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication :---

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Haryana Minerals Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri A.K. Dalui , Ex - Blaster w.e. f. 21-12- 1992 is just, fair and legal ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to and from what date ?"

2. Brief facts which have given rise to the instant reference are that workman Shri A.K. Dalui was employed withthe management respondent on 19-7-1990 as Blaster and was illegally retrenched by the respondent management on 21-12-92 illegaliy in violation of the provisions contained in Sections 25 - F and N of the I.D. Act, 1947 without notice or retrenchment compensation or and without obtaining permission from the appropriate Government as required under Section 25 - N of the I.D. Act. He claims reinstatement with all benefits ofthe service .

3. The management contested the claim of the workman by filing reply/ written statement raising preliminary objections namely that the establishment/ undertaking where workman was working was having less than 100 workmen and the services of the workman havebeen retrenched in compliance with Section 25 - F of the I.D. Act after fulfilling the requirements and that provisions of Section 25 - N were not attracted in this and the impugned order is just, legal and valid and has been passed in compliance with the relevant provisions contained in Section 25 - F of the I.D. Act and in lieu of one month notice retrenchment compensation has been paid to the workman , The retrenchment has been upheld to be in compliance with the I.D. Act, 1947 namely Section 25- F by the Punjab and Haryana High Court vide its judgement dated 4-2-94 and even Special Leave Petition against the same has been dismissed as withdrawn . In view ofthe above claim is not maintainable . Claimant is estopped from his own act and conduct . He has otherwise no locus standi and that the worman is gainfully employed after retrechment . On merits it is averred that the retrenchment is just , legal and valid and it is denied that the claimant isjobless . Order of compensation has been passed by the competent authority . The High Court in its judgment has found that no injustice has been done to the aggrieved parties including the claimant and that no junior person has been kept in service after retrenchment . Claimant workrnan was one of the petitioners in the said writ petition. Claim is not maintainable and workman is not entitled to any relief.

4. In evidence the management filed affidavit of Shri S.N. Sharma , Senior Mining Engineer , Haryana 7041 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक1, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Minerals Ltd. , Faridabad who was cross - examined by the workman representative . Workman filed his own affidavit insupport ofhis claim . He was also cross - examined by the A/R of the Management . After recording evidence of the parties arguments were addressed by the workman himself and none appeared for the management .

I have perused the record meticusly.

the 1.D. Act and notice in compliance of section 25 - F have been duly issued and served and that provisions contained in I.D. Act, 1947 have been strictly followed including sections 25 -F , H and G etc. but has not been cross-examined on these questions . Not a single question has been asked pertaining to this aspect in cross- examination . Thus , it is proved that the workman has been retrenched following relevant provisions of law and that his retrenchiment has been held to be justified evenby the High Court. In view of this I am of the opinion that the workman is not entitled to reinstatement/re- employment as claimed. Thus , I am of the view that the action of the management in terminating the services of the claimant is justified. Reference is , thus answered in affirmative and he is not entitled to the relief claiment . Award is given accordingly.

S. S. BAL, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 2682.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947

का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में राष्ट्रीय नमूना सर्वेक्षण संस्थान के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जयपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी.- 35/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-9-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं: एल-42012/224/2002- आई . आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 24th September, 2004

S.O. 2682. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 35/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of National Sample Survey Organisation , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24-9-2004.

[No. L-42012/224/2002- IR (CM-II)) N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

CASE NO . CGIT-35/2003

: -

Reference No. L- 42012/ 224/2002 IR (CM- II)

Sh. Nandlal Balai ,

Applicant

S/o Sh . Pooranmal Balai , R/o Mohalla Bramchari Dargu Ka Than , Alwar (Rajasthan)

Versus

5. In the instant case the workman who was working as Blaster , Silica Mines was retrenched . It appears that the workman was working at Bandhwari Stone Mines when he was retrenched vide order dated 21-12-92 . The impugned retrenchment order was challenged in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and the Punjab and Haryana High Court vide his judgment dated 4-2-94 held that the company i.e. respondent was justified in making some retrenchment since no injustice has been done to the petitioners in as much as no junior person in their respective category has been kept in service after retrenchment I am of the opinion that no case for interference under article 226 has been made out. From the above observation it is obvious that the impugned retrenchment order was held to be justified by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and it was also held by the said Court that no junior person in their respective category has been kept . The petitioner A.K. Dalui was one of the party in case captioned as Bimlesh Kumar Sharma Vs. Haryana Minerals Ltd. and others C.W.P. No. 2299/1993 wherein the above said judgment was delivered by Shri R. S. Mongia Judge . However, it was further observed by the High Court that Id. counsel for the petitioner submitted that workmen were posted at Silica Mines where no retrenchment was called for and they should not have been retrenched . 1 am sure that if any representation is made by them the company would consider the same on merits . According to the said judgment petitioner No. 12 A.K. Dalui was required to make representation but it appears that no representation has been made . The same if made must have been rejected by the respondent . Since the petitioners stand retrenched and retrenchment order has been held to be justified , in view of the facts and circumstances of this case by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in the above said judgment . Said judgment is binding upon the petitioner and he cannot challenge the same . The workman has failed to show that any person junior to him has been engaged or reappointed by the respondent or that the respondent has not complied with the provisions contained in section 25 -F ofthe I.D. Act as claimed by him . Though he has claimed that he has not been given notice and the pay for notice period but on the other hand the management respondent has claimed that it has complied with the provisions and MWI S.N.Sharma Senior Mining Engineer has filed his affidavit in evidence claiming that services of the workman have been retrenched in accordance with section 25 - F of

3050 G1/04-24A 7042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

1. The Deputy Director, National Sample Survey Organisation , Field Operation Division . 70/149, Patel Marg , Mansarovar, Jaipur.

Non-applicants 2. The Superintendent, National Sample Survey Organisation , Field Operation Division , 8/41 , Ν.Ε.Β.R.H.B. Colony, Alwar( Rajasthan)

PRESENT :

PresidingOfficer: SH. K.C. Sharina

: Sh . Kunal Rawat

Forthe applicant:

: Sh . Brahmanand Sandhu For the non- applicants

Dateof award: 13-09-2004

AWARD

1. The CentralGovernment in exercise ofthe powers conferred under Clause ' D' of sub-section 1 and 2(A) to Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereln- after referred to as the ' Act' ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under :-

"Whether the action of the management of National Sample Organisation in terminating the services of workman Shri Nandlal Balai S/o Shri Pooranmal Balai w.e.f. 8-2-2000 was legal and justified ? If not , to whatreliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date?"

2. The workman in his statement of claim has pleaded that he was appointed by the non - applicant establishment after selecting him as a 4th class employee who reported for his duty on 3-5-99 and continuously worked up to 8-2- 2000 but on 8-2-2000, his service was terminated who raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. The Conciliation Officer submitted the failure report to the Central Government which has forwarded this reference . Theworkman has challenged his termination order on the grounds that his service was terminated in violation of Section 25 - F of the Act and that after his termination the fresh hands were recruited by the management in violation of Section 25 - H of the Act . He has prayed that the termination order dated 8-2-2000 be declared as null and void and he may be reinstated in the service with all consequential benefits .

3. Disputing the claim , the non - appucants in thei counter statement has averred that the claimant was appointed on daily wages basis as a stopgap arrangement because one Sh . Mahesh Chand , Peon or regular basis

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] was put under suspension w.e.f. 31-3-99 to 8-2-2000 and some operational difficulty and inconvenience was felt in performing day- to - day work of the office , therefore, the petitioner was appointed till the finalisation of the disciplinary proceedings against Sh . Mahesh Chand . They have categorically denied that the workman was employed in a regular pay scale. They have further stated that the workmen only worked for 196 days out of 282 days during the period and the wages were paid to him only for 196 days. Theyhave stated that from 27-11-99 to 30-11-99, the workman was not working with the non- applicant establishment. They have further pleaded that when Sh. Mahesh Chand joined the duty, then the service of the workmanwas terminated . They have denied the violation ofSection 25- H of the Act.

4. In the rejoinder , the workman has reiterated the facts as stated in his statement of claim .

5. On the pleadings of both the parties , the following points for determination were framed :---

1. Whether the workman was selected by the non -applicant management as Class IV Employee and was appointed vide order dated 26-4-1999 who reported for duty on 3-5-99 and continuouslyworked up to 8-2-2000?

11. Whether the service of the workman as terminated inviolation ofthe provision under. Section 25 -F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?

III . Whether after the termination of the workman , new employees were recruited by the management in violation of the provision under Section 25 -H of the Act ?

V. Whether the workman is entitled to be reinstated in the service with all other consequential benefits ?

6. In the evidence , the workman has submitted his affidavit and on behalf of non-applicants , the counter- affidavits of Sh . SL Manaria , Joint Director was brought on the record. Both the parties have led the documentary evidence also .

7. 1 have heard both the parties and have gone through the record. The point- wise discussion runs as under:-

Points No. I & II

8. Both these points contain the identical facts , which are discussed together hereunder .

9. The Id. representative for the workman contends that the workman had worked with the non- applicant

3050 G1 /04-24B 7043 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

to perform his duties from 9.30 AM to 6 PM . A certificate ofexperience Ex . W- 2 was also issued by the management in his favour disclosing that he had worked w.e.f. 3-5-99 to 26-11-99 and from 1-12-99 to 8-2-2000 with the non - applicant management . The termination order Ex . W- 3 states that his service was terminated w.e.f. the afternoon of the 8thFebruary, 2000.

management continuously from 3-5-99 to 8-2-2000, who wasselected in the interview and the appointment letter Ex. W- 1 was issued in his favour . He adds that the workman has completed 240 days of work with the non- applicant management and that the plea of the non- applicants that the workman was employed as a stopgap arrangement is hot proved from the appointment letter Ex . W- 1 . TheId . representative then has contended that the management has also disclosed that there was 4 days gap in the continuous working of the applicant , which is artificial and in support of his contention , the 1d. representative has relied upon 1995 (3 ) WLC (Rajasthan ) 719 .

15. As against it, the management witness Sh . SL Manaria, Joint Director has deposed that the workman was appointed as a stopgap arrangement because Sh . Mahesh Chand, Peon was put under suspension fromn 31-3-99 to 8-2-2000 . The next plea adopted on behalf ofthe management is that the workman had worked only 196 days out of 282 days during his period of employment . In his cross - examination , this witness has admitted that the name of the workman was called for from the employment exchange , who also appeared in the interview . He has admitted that the workman had continuously worked from 3-5-99 to 8-2-2000, but he did not perform from 27-11-99 to 30-11-99 . He has also admitted that the orders Ex : W- I to W - 3 pertain to their department which have got no reference of Sh . Mahesh Chand.

10. Refuting the submission made on behalf of the workman , the Id. representative for the non - applicants argues that on account of the suspension of one employee named Sh . Mahesh Chand , the workman was employed as a stopgap arrangement who only worked for 196 days and the payment of wages was made to him to this extent only. The next contention of the ld. representative is that there is only one sanctioned post of the 4th Class and after the revocation of the suspension of Sh . Mahesh Chand , he has joined on it . The Id . representative has relied upon the payment sheet by which the wages were paid to the disputant .

11. 1 have bestowed my thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions .

16. On the basis of the aforesaid oral and documentary evidence , it is crystal clear that the workman was selected to the post of the 4th Class on daily wages basis vide order dated 26-4-99 , who reported on his duty on 3-5-99 and continuously worked up to 8-2-2000.

12. The workman in his affidavit has stated that he was selected to the post of 4th Class vide order Ex . W- 1 dated 26-4-99, who continuously worked from 3-5-99 to 8-2-2000 and the management has also issued an experience certificate Ex . W- 2 in his favour. He then has deposed that on 8-2-2000 , his service was terminated vide order Ex . W- 3 issued by the non - applicant management . He has categorically stated that during the period w.e.f. 3-5-99 to 8-2-2000 , three days break was given by the management which was artificial and even on these days he had worked under the employment of the non - applicant management.

17. On behalf of the non - applicants , it has been emphatically stated that the workman had not completed 240 days of work with the management and the break in hisfunctioning is pointed out from 3-5-99 to 8-2-2000 . It isfully established on the basis ofthe workman's evidence as well as on account of the documents pertaining to the non - applicant management that the workman was continuously working with the management from 3-5-99 to 8-2-2000. Even if it is presumed that there was four days break in the employment, then on the basis of the aforesaid evidence, it appears to be an artificial break only. The Id. representative for the workman has drawn my attention towards 1995 (3 ) WLC (Rajasthan ) 719 , wherein the Hori'ble Court has held as below :

13. In the cross -examination , the workman has deposed that he used to fill the drinking water in the pitchers and did mopping and dusting in the office and used to place the files to the authorities when required by them. He was the only 4th Class who was working in the office . Although he has admitted that the break in his employment from 26-11-99 to 30-11-99 was given by the management but during this period he regularly attended hisofficial duties . The workman has remained unshaken in his cross - examination .

"Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Workmen of American Express International Banking Corporation Vs. Management of American Express International Banking Corporation , reported in AIR 1986 S.C. 458 , wherein the question which had arisen for consideration of the Apex Court was as to whether Sundays and every paid holiday should be taking into account forthe purpose of reckoning the total number of days on which the workman could be said to have 14. His testimony is further supported from the appointment letter Ex. W- 1 dated 26-4-99 which says that he is appointed on the daily wages basis who would have 7044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA I , 1926

actually worked . It was held by the Apext Court that the principles of statutory considerations are well- settled and has held as under :-

"Theexpression which we are required to construe is' actually worked under the employer ' . This expression according to us , cannot mean those days only when the workman worked with hammer , sickle or pen , but must necessarily comprehended all those days during which he was in the employment ofthe employer and for which he had been paid wages either under express or implied contract of service or by compulsion of statute, standing orders , etc. "

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and examining the rival claims and contentions and perusing the relevant documents placed on the record , I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner is entitled to succeed and the ration ofthe above referred judgments of theApex Court as well as of this Court are fully applicable to the facts of the present case."

18. Thus , the contention advanced on behalf of the workman that the artificial break given by the management would also be included in reckoning the period of working rendered by the workman is fully supported by the judgment cited supra . On the basis of the evidence adduced by both the parties on the record, it is fully established that the workman had completed over 240 days of work in the calendar year under the employment ofthe non - applicant management.

19. Now, I turn to the next contention advanced on behalf of the non - applicants that the workman was employed as a stopgap arrangement because one employee Sh . Mahesh Chand was placed under suspension . Firstly , the documents Ex. W- I to W-3 do not demonstrate this fact that the disputant was employed in place of Sh . Mahesh Chand. Secondly , it is the testimony of the management witness Sh . SL Manaria that Sh . Mahesh Chand was put under suspension w.e.f. 31-3-99 to 8-2-2000 and as a stopgap arrangement, the disputant was appointed on daily wages basis . But in support of his testimony, no document could be brought on the record which could suggest that Sh . Mahesh Chand was placed under suspension during this period and in place of him , as a stopgap arrangement, the claimant was appointed . As such , the plea adopted by the management seems tobe an afterthought which untrustworthy.

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 20. In the light of the aforesaid facts and judicial pronouncement, the workman succeeds in establishing that he had worked over 240 days with the non - applicant management in the calendar year preceding to 8-2-2000 and whose service was terminated in violation of the mandates contained under Section 25 - F of the Act . Therefore, both these points are decided in favour of the workman and against the non - applicants .

PointNo. III

21. The Ld. representative for the workman contends that after the termination of the workman, one Sh . Mahesh Chand was appointed by the non - applicant management. Contraryto it, the Ld. representative for the non -applicants submits that Sh . Mahesh Chand was already on the roll of the management and it was not a fresh appointment.

22. In the claim statement, the workman has not named Sh . Mahesh Chand as an employee who was appointed after his termination , nor he could be able to produce any positive and definite evidence in this context that after his termination , a fresh hand was recruited by the management without providing him an opportunity of employment . As such, the workman has failed to prove the onus on this point . Accordingly , this point is de against the workman.

PointNo. IV

23. On account ofthe decision on the points No. 1 & Il in favour ofthe workman, he is entitled to be reinstated in the service . The workman has disclosed in his claim statement as well as in his affidavit that since his termination he isunemployed. No proof of his employment elsewhere couldbe produced on behalf of the management . Therefore , the workman is also entitled for the back - wages .

24. In the result , the reference is answered in the affirmative in favour of the workman that the order of termination dated 8-2-2000 is illegal and unjustified , which is quashed . The claim of the disputant is allowed and it is held that he is entitled to be reinstated in the service with its continuity and 50 per cent back -wages . An award is passed in these terms accordingly.

25. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17 ( 1 ) of the Act.

R. C. SHARMA, Presiding Officer 7045

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 24 सितम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 2683. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947(1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बजाज इलैक्ट्रीकल लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में राष्ट्रीय औद्योगिक अधिकरण , मुम्बई ( संदर्भ संख्या एनटीबी-5 /2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-9-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल-22013/1/2004- आई.आर. ( सी-11 ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

Federation ( the Federation for short ) . It was submittedby the complainant that the conditions of service of the workman employed by the company were being decided though the Settlements made by the company and Federation from time to time . The workman stated that pursuant to a domestic enquiry, he was suspended on 9-3-2000. He stated further that the company paid to him by way of suspension allowance 50 % of monthly salary drawn by him immediately before the suspension for 90 daysperiod of his suspension , 75 per cent of the aforesaid monthly salary for next 90 days and full monthly salary after expiry of 180 days as per Standing Orders applicable to him . It appears from the complainant that he is however, New Delhi , the 24th September, 2004

S.O. 2683.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. NTB -5 of2003) (Arising out of Reference No. NTB - 1 of 1997 ) of the National Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bajaj Electric Limited and their workman , which was received b Central Government on 24-9-2004.

[No. L-22013 / 1 /2004- IR(C- II )] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI

PRESENT :

Justice Shri S. C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer

COMPLAINT NO . NTB- 5 OF 2003

Arising out of Ref. No. NTB- 1 of 1997

PARTIES:

Applicant

V. Subramanian

V/ s.

Opp. Party

Bajaj Electricals Ltd.

APPEARANCES :

Shri Chidambaram

For the Applicant

: Shri C. V. Pawaskar, Adv.

For the Opp. Party

: Shri M.S. Paranjpe, Adv.

Maharashtra

State

Mumbai , dated the 8th day of September , 2004

AWARD

aggrieved by the aforesaid payment of the suspension allowance on the basis of his monthly salary as on 9-3-2000. It was claimed that the workman was entitled to suspension allowance on the basis of the monthly wage he was entitled to receive during the period of suspension . It was claimed that the workman was entitled to receive basic wages as per wage scale providing for annual increment . It was also claimed that his monthly salary included Dearness Compensatory Allowance (D.C.A. ) which is linked with Mumbai Consumer Price Index . According to the workman , this Consumer Price Index varied from month to month . Consequently, he was entitled to the suspension allowance based on the monthly wages - as changed in accordance with Mumbai Consumer Price Index . The workman also averred that his entitlement of annual increment should also taken into account for working out his suspension allowance at the aforesaid rate. It was claimed that two aforesaid ingredients of the basic wage could not be ignoredby the company. The workman averredthat the payment ofsuspension allowance, on the foundation of salary drawn by him in the month of February 2000 amounted to variation of his service conditions within the meaning of secon 33 ( 1 )(a) of the Act. It was averred that the workman was the member ofMumbai Labour Unionwhich was affiliated to the Federation . Consequently, his service conditions could not be changed during the pendency of Ref. NTB No. 1 of 1997. It was averred thatthe pending reference was in nospect of number of demands made by the Federation including the fixation of wages . Therefore, the company was not entitled to change the conditions of the concerned workman in the industrial dispute to his prejudice . The workman claimed that he was the concemed workman and that calculation ofsuspension allowance on the basis of salary drawn by him.in Feb. 2003 amounted to violation of Section 32 ofthe Act . Consequently, thisdispute could be decided as ifthe appropriate Govt. has referred an industrial dispute before this tribunal and grant reliefto workman by giving award in his favour by directing correct calculation of suspension allowance and interest on the amount withheld.

2. In the written statement the following plea was taken . That there is no law which required the companyto 1. This is an application under section 33 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( the Act for short ) requiring thistribunal to decide the complaint filed by V. Subramanian (the workman for short ) against M/ s. Bajaj Electrical Ltd. (the company for short ) . The workman stated in his complaint that Reference NTB- 1 of 1997 was pending before this tribunal . The aforesaid reference workman were represented by All India Bajaj Electrical Employees [PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 7046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Itwould be apparent from the words aforesaid that if the dispute between the parties was confined to amount payable and not principles involved in calculating the subsistence allowance , then Section 33 (c) (2) of the Act shall apply. In case both the parties were applying the same principle for claiming a particular amount , but there was dispute as to quantum of payment , then Section 33(c) (2 ) of the Act shall come into play . However, when workmen calculates the subsistence allowance on principle 'A' and the employer on principle ' B ' then the dispute not only raise question calculation but aiso as to applicability of correct principle. The dispute regarding principle is regarding substantive rights of the parties . It is not even a incidental dispute . It has to be decided in an adjudication consequently, the objection that Section 33 ( c) ( 2 ) of the Act applies is hereby rejected.

pay the workman the suspension allowance calculated on the basis of monthly wage of each month along with the Dearness Compensatory Allowance and the annual increment due to workman as if he was in service . It was further averred that workman is not a workman concerned with the industrial dispute in Reference No. NTB No. I of 1997 raisedby the Federation against the company. The Mumbai General Employees Association has entered into settlement with the company in 1996 and 2000. The workman had taken benefit of those settlement and consequently , this tribunal cannot permit the complainant to invoke the provisions of Section 33A of the Act . On merits it was denied that the company had changed the conditions of service of workman and consequently, the company was not required to seek permission under Section 33 ( 1 ) ( a ) of the Act . The dispute was in respect of calculation of suspension allowance and as such , it is covered by Section 33 ( c ) (2) of the Act . It was stated that workman was paid subsistence allowance under the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act . It was denied that the complainant was a member of Mumbai Labour Union and that the Union was affiliated to Federation . It was claimed that the workman was entitled to subsistance allowance on the basis of monthiy salary on the date of suspension but not on every month after suspension as if he was in service.

3.Before embarking upon the disposal of this case on merits , this tribunal decides the question if Section 33 ( c)(2) of the Act was attracted . In the opinion of this tribunal the dispute between the company of workman is not a dispute only for caicuiation of the amount regarding no adjudication . It is well established that the powers exercised by a Labour Court under Section 33 ( c ) ( 2 ) are akin to powers exercised by an executing Court under the Code of Civil Procedure . An Executing Court under the Code of Civil procedure does not decide substantive dispute between the parties . It has power to execute the decree or orders as the case may be . Although this analogy is not wholly adequate , in describing the powers under Section 33 ( c ) (2 ) of the Act, the Supreme Court and several High Courts have stated that powers of Labour Court are that of Executing court. The text of Section 33 ( c ) ( 2 ) ofthe Act is as follows :

4.At the very outset it is incumbent upon this tribunal to determine its own jurisdiction under Section 33 -A of the Act . It maybe noticed that the Central Govt . has power and discretion to refer a dispute to a National Tribunal under clause ( 1A) of section 10 of the Act even if it is not anappropriate Government . The Central Govt . has referred the Reference NTB No. I of 1997 for resoiving the industrial dispute between the company and the Federation. It is not in dispute that workınan who is employed at Mumbai is a member ofMumbai Labour Union . The Mumbai Labour Union is affiliated to the Federation . Thus , it cannot be disputed that during pendency of Reference NTB No. I of 1997, the company cannot change conditions of service applicable a workman immediately before the commencement of Reference NTB No. 1 1997. It cannotbe disputed that the prescribed rate of wage at the time of startof pendency of a workman cannot be changed to his prejudice . Ordinarily, the workman would be deemed to be connected with the dispute because the jurisdiction of Federation is for ail the units of the company wherever they are situated. However, it has been argued on behalf of the company that Bombay Labour Union had accepted the settlement with the company in 1996 itself. Therefore , the workman who was the member of Bombay Labour Union and had taken the advantage and the benefit provided by the company under two independent settlements . Consequently , the dispute under Section 33 - A of the Act cannot be raised by the workman , Countering the_aforesaid argument on behalf of the ...deration , Shri Chidambaram argued that the workman was not a member of the Mumbai Labour Union . The settlements of 1996 and 2000 of the company with the Bombay Labour Union cannot be taken into consideration for employing the principle of estoppei .

5. It appears to this tribunal that the industriai dispute covered by Ref. No. NTB - 1 of 1997 also included the dispute ifthe company could enter into a separate agreement with a Union which is the part of the Union and if it was valid . Under these circumstances , the argument raised on 33 - C (2 ) Where any workman is entitled to receive from the employer any money or any benefit which is capable of being computed in terms of money and if any question arises as to the amount of money due or as to the amount at which such benefit should be computed , then the question may, subject to any rules that maybe made under this Act,be decided by such Labour Court as may be specified in this behalf by the Appropriate Government ( within a period not exceeding three months ) .

7047 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/का तक 1 , 1926

Act 1946 as amended by the Bombay State or the rules framed by the Bombay State .

behalf of the company on the ground that the Bombay Labour Union had entered into a separate defying the federation cannot be accepted . Nor can this argument that the workman had taken the advantage of the Settlement of the Bombay Labour Union , and therefore , he cannot turn around , and raise the present dispute be accepted . In the opinion of this tribunal , the workman may have taken advantage of the benefits provided to him . However , it has not been specifically pointed out that how the advantage of two settlements has affected the company prejudicially so far as the wages of the workman are concerned . This tribunal has now held that the award given by it shall also bind the Bombay establishment .

8. As against this it has been argued on behalf of the company that the establishment at Bombay is registered under Bombay Shops and Establishment Act 1948. It is a Commercial establishment under Section 2(4) of the Act. By virtue of Section 38 (B ) of the Act the Industrial Employments (Standing Orders ) Act 1946 is applicable to Maharashtra State became applicable to the establishment when its employees were more than 50. The employees as defined under 2 (6 of that Act is not confined to workman . TheOfficers shall also be employees because the definition iswider that workman under Section 2 ( s ) ofthe Act which became applicable to the Central Act as per 2 ( 1 ) of the Industrial Emplosment ( Standing Orders ) Act 1946. The definition 2 ( 1 ) was inserted in 1982 to clarify that term 'wages' and workman shall be same as defined by the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. Thus it appeared that the Industrial Employment ( Standing Orders ) Act 1947 became applicable . It was amended by the Central Govt. by adding Section 10A . It reads as under :

10-A Payment of subsistence allwoance : ( 1 ) Where any workman is suspended by the employer pending investigation or inquiry into complaints or charges ofmisconduct against him . The employer shall pay to such workman subsistence allowance-

(a) at the rate of fifty per cent of the wages which theworkman was entitled to immediately preceding the date of such suspension , for the first ninety days of suspension ; and

(b) at the rate of seventy five per cent of such wages for the remaining period of suspension if the delay in the completion of disciplinary proceedings against such workman is not directly attributable to the conduct of such workman.

6. Next question that has to be decided is if there was any contravention of Section33 of the Act . The complainant under Section 33 - A lies only when there is a violation of Section 33. In the opinion of this tribunal if it comes to the conclusion on merits that the conditions of service of the workman implied that during the period of his suspension the workman was entitled to annual increment as well variable DCA then non - payment ofsame would be change in the conditions of service . Under these circumstances sub- section 1 ( a) of Section 33 of the Act willbe attracted provided the conditions of service were connected with the pending dispute . The Reference No. NTB - 1 of 1997 involved the dispute regarding fixation of wages , annual increment and Dearness Compensatory Allowance . Thus , connection is established . The suspension allowance depended upon the wages and if the workman's wages were not increased according to changed monthly and annually then he can file this complaint . The workman is asking nothing but the maintenance of service conditions to which he is entitled to . He is a ' concerned workman ' within the meaning of Section 33 ( 1 ) ( a ) of the Act . Ifthere is contravene of Section 33 of the Act then Section 33 - A is attracted entitling this tribunal to adjudicate upon the dispute . In the award in Reference NTB - 1 of 1997 it has been held that the Bombay Establishment shall be bound by the award . It was held that the Company was unable to prove that the Bombay Union is governed by MRTU & PULP Act.

(2) If any dispute arises regarding the subsistence allowance payable to a workman under sub - section (1 ), the workman or the employer concerned may refer the dispute to the Labour Court constituted under the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the industrial establishment wherein such workman is employed is situate and the Labour Court to which the dispute is so referred shall , after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard , decide the dispute and such decision shall be final and binding on the parties.

(3) Not withstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this secton , where provisions relating to payment of subsistence allowance under any other law for the time being in 7. It has been argued before this tribunal on behalf of the workman the Industrial Employment ( Standing Orders ) Act 1946 does not apply to workman because he is working in an establishment when fifty or more workmen are not employed. In this connection , attention of this tribunal was drawn to the Annexure 10 filed by the company itself in the Reference No. NTB - 1 of 1997. The companies documents showed that at head quarters i.e. Bombay it has 218 Officers and 36 employees as the staff in 1996 and in 2000 the number of staff was 14 and that ofOfficers was 265. It was argued that at Bombay the number of workmen never reached 50. Therefore , there was no question of application of Industrial Employments ( Standing Orders ) [PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

7048

force in any State are more beneficial than the provisions of this section , the provisions of such other law shall be applicable to the payment of subsistence allowance in that state .

Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 98/1999 of the Central Govt . Indus .Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of ECL and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 24-9-2004.

[No. L-22012/281 / 1998 - IR (CM - II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL 9. However, this tribunal is of the opinion- sub Section ( 3 ) of Section 10A of the Act itself saves the sub rule 5A of Rule 23 of the Bombay Industrial Employment (Standing Orders ) Rule 1959. The rule 5A of Rule 23 (ibid) ismore beneficial to the workman because it gives benefit ofbasic wages earness allowance , and other compensatory allowances' to the suspended workman for the calculation of subsistence allowance . The workman is treated as ifhe was on leave during the period of suspension.

PRESENT : Shri Md . Sarfaraz Khan, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO . 38 OF 1999

PARTIES:

The Agent , Bahula Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfield Ltd. ,

...Management

P.O. Bahula , dist . Burdwan (WB)

Vrs.

Sri Bhim Mahto ofLachipur Colliery represented Rakesh Kumar ,

...Workman

Secretary: Koyala Mazdoor Congress , Asansol

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Advocate. 10. The workman , therefore , rightly claimed that company was bound to pay him subsistence allowance from 9-3-2000 , in the basis his basic salary linked with D.C.A. He was entitled to once half salary after making monthly calculation for first Ninety days. He shall be entitled to three fourth of basic salary plus DCA calculated herewith to month on Bornbay Consumer Price Index after ninety days and thereafter full dearness allwoance shall be paid to him . His annual increments have also be taken into consideration because the workman is treated as if he was on leave . That means he is deemed to be in service . The company shall calculate the arrears of his salary on the basis of calculation given by this tribunal and pay to him within one month of publications of this award . The company shall pay interest on the arrears at rate of 12% on the aforesid arrears and shall continue to pay suspension allowance on that basis of workman is still under suspension. There shall be no order as to costs .

: Sri Rakesh Kumar,

For the Workman (Union)

General Secretary, KoyalaMazdoor Congress , Asansol.

State: West Bengal .

Industry: Coal .

11. This compalint is adjudicated upon in accordance with Section 33 - A of the Act as if the dispute between the parties was referred to this tribunal by the Central Govt . Accordingly, this award is submitted to the central for publication in accordance with this Act .

Dated 18-08-2004.

S. C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2004

Inexercise of powers conferred by clause D of Sub- Section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 (A) of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947Government of India through theMinistry of Laobur vide its Order No. L- 22012/281/98/.. IR(CM - II ) dated 05-05-1999 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by the Tribual .

का.आ. 2684.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, ई. सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण असनसोल ( संदर्भ संख्या 98/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-9-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/281/98- आई.आर. ( सीएम -11 ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management ofLachipur Colliery of Kajora Area of M / s . ECL in dismissing the services of Sh . Bhim Mahato , Explosive Carrier is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?" .

New Delhi , the 24th September, 2004

Afterreceivingthe order of reference summons were sent to the parties concerned by Registered Post . In pursuance to the summons both the parties appeared S.O. 2684.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ), the Central 7049

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

bythe workman . The Enquiry Officer after conducting the proceedings submitted its report to the appointing authority and the charge of misconduct was duly established.

through their representatives and filed their respective written statements in support of their claim . Sri P.K. Das , Advocate represented the management and the workman appeared through Sri Rakesh Kumar , General Secretary, Koyala Mazdoor Congress , Asansol .

6. It is also the case of the management that the Ex-workman was also a habitual absentee and his attendance was very poor for the last few years . So the punishment awarded to the workman is quite proportionate andjustified in view of the gravity of misconduct proved against him . It is denied by the management that the workman was absent due to sickness and he had never been under the medical treatment of any Doctor . No any information was sent to the management by any source about the alleged sickness . So the workman is not entitled to any relief and the action of the management is totally justified.

2. The case of the workman in brief compass as set forth in the written statement is that Bhim Mahto the workman had been working as Explosive Carrier at Lachipur Colliery under Kajora Area of ECL bearing his U.M. No. 552299. He was wrongly dismissed from services of the Company with effect from 9-4-1996 for the alleged misconduct of absence under clause 17 ( 1 )( N ) of Model Standing Orders applicable to the workman vide General Manager , Kajora Area letter No. K/PM/C-6/10 /132/ 1767 dated 9-4-1996.

7. On perusal of the record it transpires that on 21-7-2004 after hearing both the parties on the preliminary point an order was passed holding that the enquiry was found to be fair and valid as the union had not challenged the faimess, validity and propriety of the alleged enquiry proceeding and both the parties hand submitted for hearing on the merit of the case and ultimately the hearing of the dispute on merit was concluded on 18-8-2004 and the order was reserved for passing the award.

3. The further case of the workman is that the total period of absence was only about 5 months i.e. from 27-10-1995 to 20-3-1996 and that was also due to the sickness of the workman and to that effect Doctor's Medical Certificate was also submitted to the management for the consideration. The management was also informed in this regard by his fellow worker . It is also the case of the workman that in such type of cases where absence is less than 6 months management had allowed to join the duty and considered their re - instatement . The fairness validity and the propriety of the enquiry proceeding has also been challenged because of the fact that the workman was not given natural justice. The workman has also claimed that second show cause notice was also not served upon him before issuing the dismissal order which is uttar violation of the direction of the Apex Court and in this regard direciton has also been issued by the CIL. The punishment awarded is also extremely disproportionate to the nature of misconduct. The workman said to be a young man is ready to service the management to the best of its satisfaction for a long period . But he is starving facing miseries of all kinds along with his family member . So it is prayed to take lenient view.

4. On the other hand as per the Written Statements the brief defence case of the management is that the present referred reference is bad in the eye of law and the same is not maintainable and the dispute referred does not come under the purview of the Industrial Dispute.

8. It is further clear from the record that none ofthe parties had examined any oral evidence rather some documents were filed by the respective parties in support oftheir case . The workman has filed the Xerox Copy ofthe order of Hon'ble Supreme Court circulated to all CMS'S and D(P) S/ of the Subsidiary Companies of CIL by the Coal IndiaLimited signed by D( P) CIL (W- 1 ) Xerox Copy of the Minutes of the Corporate JCC in which CMD allowed to joinduty to those employee who absented even for 1 year . (W-3) Xerox Copy of the letter of D(P) CIL (W-2). Like wise the management has also filed the Xerox Copy of the chargesheet dated 20-3-1996 ( M- 1 ) . Xerox Copy of the application dated 20-3-1996 sent by the workman praying therein for the grant of special leave w.e.f. 24-10-1995 (M -2) Xerox Copy ofthe order ofdismissal dated 9-4-1996 issued by the General Manager of the Colliery Kajora Area to the workman ( M -3 ) Xerox Copy of the enquiry report (M -4) . Xerox Copy ofthe enquiry proceedings (M- 5) . XeroxCopy ofthe order of the Agent of the Colliery dated 21-3-1996 appointing an enquiry officer (M - 6). Copy of the notice dated 23-3-1996 issuedby the enquiry officer to the workman , fixing the date 28-3-1996. All the aforesaid documents filed by either of the parties have not be challenged by the side of the either parties . So their legality and genuineness can't be disputed and questioned .

9. let us see as to what are the admitted facts by the- parties . It is the admitted fact that the workman Bhim Mahto was working as Explosive Carrier under the management concerned who was dismissed by the management on 9-4-1996 for the alleged misconduct ofabsence .

5. The main defence case of the management is that Bhim Mahto the workman , Ex - Explosive Carrier of Lachipur Colliery remained absent from his duty unauthorisedly without any prior permission or information since 27-10-95 for which he was issued chargesheet dated 20-3-1996 by the management under clause 17( 1 )( N ) of the Model Standing Order appicable to the establishment . The workman concerned submitted the explanation of the chargesheet but the same was found totally unsatisfactory and ultimatley a domestic enquiry was held by an independent enquiry officer which was duly participated 7050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIKA I , 1926

10. It is the further admitted fact that the workm was absent with effect from 27-10-1995 to 20-2-1996 i.e. aboutfive months which amounts to misconduct of absence under clause 17 ( 1 ) (N ) of the Model Standing Orders of the establishment .

11. It is also the admitted case of the parties that an enquiry proceeding was started against the workman and explanation was also submitted by the delinquent and he had participated in the enquiry proceeding .

12. It is pleaded in para 9 of the W/S filed by the workman that no second show - cause notice was ever issued to the workman , which is the directives of the Apex Court . This fact has not been controverted by the management in its W/S which amount to admission by the management in the eye of law . According to the settled principles of the facts admitted need not be proved under such principles. 1 do not think necessary to discuss the above said points .

13. At the very out - set I would like to mention here that although the management has taken the plea in para 1 ofW/ S that the instant reference is bad in the eye of law and the same does not come under the purview of the Industrial Dispute . But the aforesaid point has not been raised in course of hearing of the dispute nor the management has proved the same . As such I do not find any defect in the maintainability of this reference and the facts of the dispute very well comes under the purview of the Industrial Dispute Act, Which has been rightly referred to the Tribunal by the Government of India for the adjudication ofthe same. The aforesaid point is accordingly disposed off against the management .

14. The workman has taken the piea in para 3 ofhis statements of claim that he had sent intimation by his fellow worker to the management about his absence which has been vehementaly denied by the mangement vide para 7 of its W/S. Besides this the workman concerned has neither examined the co - worker through whom he had informed the management nor he has filed any chit of paper in this respect. The copy of the enquiry proceeding . (M - 5 ) filed by the management goes to show that during his statement before the enquiry officer the workman has clealry admitted that due to shortage of sufficient time he could not be able to send any information to the management . In the repeated question of the Enquiry Officer he again replied that due to business and tention he could not be able to send any information . So the contradictory statement of the workman itself creates grave doubt and goes to prove that no any intimation was sent by him to the management about his alleged absence.

15. Having considered the above facts and circumstances . I am satisfied to hold that the workman was absenting form his duty with effect from 27-10-1995 to 20-3-1996 continuously without seeking prior permission which comes under the purview ofclause 17( 1 ) (N) ofModel Standing Order and thereby the workman has been found guilty of misconduct for which he deserves punishment .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 16. Now the only point to be considered by the Court is to see as to how nor the punishment passed by the management is proportionate to the alleged nature of misconduct committed by the delinquent .

17. It was submitted by the learned lawyer of the workman (Union ) that it is a simple case of absenteeism or unauthorised leave only for about two months and the reason for the same has been fully explained before the Enquiry Officer . The attention of the Court was drawn towards the averments made in the explanation submitted bythe workman in reply to the charges . It is also submitted that satisfactory reason has been assigned in his evidence before the Enquiry Officer during the enquiry proceeding . It has been mentioned by the Enquiry Officer in his report that, " In view of the above it reveals it that due to health problem of the parents Sri Bhim Mahto left his native place without information . " There is no allegation that without satisfactory reason the delinquent was absent rather the reason of the absence of the workman has been found to be satisfactory , Admittedly the workman was under the compelling circumstances absent to discharge his pious duty towards his parents . It is further clear from the record that there is no any adverse remark about the previous conduct in respect of his attendance and he had never been over held guilty for committing any misconduct during the tenure of his service . There is no pleadings of the management side in its W/ S on this point. I also find force in the submission of the learned lawyer of the workman that no second show- cause notice was issued to the workman before passing the order of dismissal which isthe deliberate vioiation of the mandate ofthe Apex Court.

18. Besides this when the Model Standing Order applicable to the establishment under 27.1 (page- 15 ) provide various miner punishments . I fail to understand as to why.. only maximum punishment available under the said clause should be awarded on the facts of the present case. I am of the view that the punishment of dismissal for an unauthorised leave for a few months under the compelling circumstance and without any uiterior motive is too harsh a punishment which is totally dispcoportionate to the misconduct alleged . It is a plain and simple case which should have been deait with by taking a lenient view .

19. Under the above fact , circumstances and the discussion made I am satisfled to held that the punishment imposed by the employer is not commensurate with the nature and gravity of the misconduct proved against the delinquent and as such the impugned order of punishment by way of dismissal is hereby set aside and the delinquent isdirected to be re - instated with continuity of service with a back wages of 40% from the date of the punishment . Let the award be and the same is passed accordingly . Copies of this award be sent to the Ministry of Labour for information and needful .

MD. SARFARAZ KHAN , Presiding Officer भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 27 सितम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 2685.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एफ. सी. आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जयपुर (संदर्भ संख्या जे -28 /99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-9-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-22012/242/98- आई.आर. (सी.एम. - 11 ) ]

एन. पी . केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 27th September , 2004 S.O. 2685. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. J -28/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of FCI and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 24-9-2004 .

[No. L-22012/242/98 - IR (CM - II )]

N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

Case No. J- 28/99

Reference No, L- 22012 /242 /98/ IR/ (CM - II )

Shri Ram Chandra,

S/o Sh . Toda Ram ,

...Applicant

R/ o 3A9 , Pratap Nagar , HousingBoard, Jodhpur

Versus

1. The Distt . Manager , F. C. I. Residency Road, Jodhpur.

2. Sr. Regional Manager,

F. C. I. , Nehru Place, Tonk Road,

7051

AWARD

The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause ' D ' of sub- section 1 and 2 (A) to Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ' Act ' ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under:-

"Whether the action of the management of FCI in retiring the workman Sh . Ram Chandra S/o Toda Ram w.e.f. 25-10-1997 instead of 28-02-98 and not allowing him pension benefits on the pattern of Central Govt. is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. In his amended claim statement , the workman has pleaded that he had taken over the charge of the Shifter on 13-2-1962 in the Food Department of India , whose service was regularized w.e.f. 4-3-1981 . On constituting the Food corporation of India ( in short, ' FCI ' ) on 1-1-66 , his service was transfered from the Food Department to the FCI . He has further stated that he along with his fellow workman Sh . Bhom Bahadur , Chowkidar has opted all the facilities available in the Food Department and for the said purpose, be had given his option by filling up the prescribed proforma under Section 12-A. It was only by his letter dated 20-2-81 that the Regional Manager had asked Sh . Bhom Bahadur and him for giving their option , that he was the employee of the Central Food Department and the facilities of loan , convenience loan , festival loan , ete. were admissible to him as per the rules of the Central Food Department. He has also stated that the non- applicant management by his order dated 21-4-97 asked him to fill up the form of superannuation , whereby his date of superannuation was disclosed as on 20-2-98, whereas in the letter dated 5-5-97, the Manager in his forwarding letter had described his superannuation date on 28-2-98 . He has pointed out that in all the relevant documents his superannuation date was disclosed as 28-2-98 , but without any reason he was superannuated w.e.f. 25-10-97 , while Sh. Bhom Bahadur had continued in the service up to 60 years of age . On these grounds , the claimant has prayed that the retirement order dated 25-10-97 may be quashed and he may be treated in continuity of the service w.e.f. 25-10-97 .

.....Non- applicants

Jaipur,

PRESENT ;

SH. R. C. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

Sh. Rajiv Bhatia.

For the applicant :

Sh . P. C. Shah .

For the non - applicants:

31-8-2004 .

Date ofaward ;

3. In the amended written statement , the non- applicants have averred that the workman was the employee ofthe FCI , whose date of superannuation was on attaining the age of 58 years and that his service was transferred from the Food Department to the FCI on 1-3-69 , They have stated that the case of Sh . Bhom Babadur is entirely different from that of the workman and the workman had never filled up - proforma under Section 12- A. It has been further pointed out that the workman had admitted to be. the employee of the FCI on 10-8-78 and thereafter 7052

[ PART II- SEC. 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

clarified that on account of the Gazette notification , the service ofthe workman as Shifter was transferred on the said date to the Corporation .

confirming his service under the corporation , the order was issued on 4-3-81 , As per the averment , the workman was previously an employee of the Central Food Department but on account of transferring his service on his option , his service was amalgamated in the corporation . It has also been further stated that he was not entitled to get the benefit of superannuation on attaining the age of 60 years .

4. On 28-10-2003 , on the pleadings of both the parties , the following points for determination were framed:-

1. Whether the services of the workman were transferred to the Food Corporation of India and that he had opted all the benefits admissible to him under the Corporation ? BOA

11 . Whether the termination of the service of the workman on 25-10-97 is unjustified and amounts to the unfair labour practice ? BOA

III . Whether the non - applicant management has shown the superannuation date of the workman as on 23-2-98 in his letters dated 5-5-97 as well as in the forwarding letter dated 8-10-97? BOA

IV. Whether the workman is entitled to be deemed in service from 25-10-97 to 28-2-98 and is entitled to get the salary of the said period? BOA

8. This fact thus stands unrebutted that on 1-3-69 , the service of the workman was transferred to the Corporation . So far as the question of the exercising the option is concerned, the workman has stated in his affidavit that he along with other two employees , viz . , Kali Singh and Bhom Bahadur had opted for the Food Department contrary to it, the management's case is that the workman had-duly applied through the prescribed proforma to the Corporation for exercising his option to the service thereof. In support ofthe management's case. the management has exhibited the application form Ex . M- 1 which has been signed by the workman and wherein he had opted the scale of pay applicable to the post under the Corporation to which he was transferred and the benefits e.g. the leave encashment, provident fund and other terminal benefits admissible to the employees of the Corporation were also opted by him . The other documents are Ex. M-2, M-3 and M - 4, the letters written bythe workman to the authority of the corporation wherein he has reiterated that all his colleagues ' services have already been transferred to the Corporation , who are availing all the facilities as per the rules ofthe Corporation , buthe is being deprived of these benefits , though he had already furnished his option for the FCI benefits . He has subsequently requested therein to provide FCI's facilities as being provided to the other employees of the corporation.

V Whether the workman has obtained the CPF benefits and , therefore , he is restrained to get the pensionary benefits? BOM

5. The workman has submitted his affidavit, In the defence , on behalf of the non - applicants , the counter- affidavits of MW - 1 , Sh. B. K. Gupta, Distt . Manager & M W-2, Sh . Manoharlal , Assistant Manager have been placed on the record , Both the parties have also placed on record the documentary evidence .

6. I have heard both the parties and have gone through the record . Then point- wise discussion runs as under:-

Point No. 1

9. In his cross- examina con , the workman has admitted that the option form Ex. M - I and other letters Ex.M-2 to M -4 carry his signatures . He has further admitted that he was working in the Corporation , but he has pointed out that the rules of the Food Departrnent were applicable to him. In support of his statement he could not be able to produce any documentary or other trustworthy evidence . on the point. He has further admitted that when the Corporation came into existence , his service was automatically transferred therein , that there was a Gazette notification for his transfer and that the rules of the Food Department were applicable to him but he has not given anything in writing in this context . He has further stated that he opted to continue in the central Government service , but has also further admitted that he has got no copy of such option with him .

10. MW- 1 , Sh . B. K. Gupta could not be shaken on this point in his cross - examination that the workman had not exercised his option for the corporation . The evidence adduced on behalf of the management is definite and positive which goes to establish that the workman had opted for the service under the corporation and the workman has failed to prove this fact that he had not exercised his option to avail the facilities admissible to the 7. The workman's case is that he was transferred from the central Food Department to the Corporation , when it came into the existence , but he had not opted the benefits admissible to him under the Corporation . In the cross - examination , the workman has deposed that his sevice was transferred from the Food Departmentto the Corporation w.e.f. 1-1-66 . As against it , the management witness Sh . B. K. Gupta has stated in his affidavit that w.e.f. 1-3-69 , the service of the workman was transferred to the corporation and has further 7053 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

employees of the corporation . This point is , therefore, decided against the workman .

Point No II & III

examination that on the transfer of his service to the Corporation , he was getting the pay admissible to the employees ofthe Corporation . On these counts , both these points are answered against the workman and in favour of themanagement .

Point No. IV

11. Since the facts involved under both these points are identical , these are being discussed together hereunder .

12. The workman's stand is that since he was working as an employee of the Food Department , the superanuation age under the rules applicable to the employees of the Food Department was on attaining the age of 60 years , but hewas retired w.e.f. 25-10-97 instead of28-2-98 . In his cross- examination , the workman has admitted that the superannuation age of the employees working under the Corporation is 58 years . Admittedly, the employee under the corporation is superannuated on attaining the age of 58 years .

16. Theld. representative for the workman contends that the superannuation age of the workman was 60 years and , therefore , he was permitted to continue even after attaining the age of 59 years and six months . The Id . representative further adds that his retirement w.e.f. 25-10-97 is invalid and he should be deemed to be in service from 25-10-97 to 28-2-98 and the salary ofthis period should be paid to him . This submission has been opposed on behalf of the non - applicants on the ground that the workman had exercised its option for the service under the Corporation wherein the superannuation age is 58 years .

13. In this context , on behalf of the workman it has been contended that the workman was allowed to continue in the service up to the age of 59 years and six months , which shows that he was continuing under the service of the Food Department . Secondly, the letter dated 5-5-97 written by the Assistant Manager , FCI to the District Manager, FCI has been relied upon by the workman which says that Sh . Ram Chandra is retiring from the Food Corporation of India on 28-2-98 after completion of 32 years and two months FCI service.

17. Under the forgoing points , it has been decided that the workman had opted for the service under the Corporation and the benefits admissible to the employees ofthe Corporation were sought by him . It has been shown on behalf of the non - applicants that inadvertently the workman was permitted to continue on his duties despite the fact that his superannuation age became due on 28-2-96 . Looking to the aforesaid facts, it is crystal clear that the workman had exercised his option for the service under the Corporation wherein admittedly the superannuation age is 58 years . Therefore , if the workman was permitted to continue even after his superannuation date i.e. 28-2-96, it does not confer any legal right upon him to be deemed to be continued up to attaining the age of 60 years . Therefore , he is not entitled to this benefit and this point is answered against him.

Point No.V

14. Countering this submission made on behalf of the workman , it has been contended by the Id . representative for the non - applicants that these facts were inadvertently mentioned in this letter and similarly the workman was allowed to continue up to 25-10-97 inadvertently, whereas his date of retirement was due on 28-2-96 when he attained the age of 58 years .

18. On behalf of the non - applicants , the Id. representative has sought to contend that there are no pensionary benefits admissible under the Corporation rules and , therefore , the workman is not entitled to the pensionary benefits . The next contention canvassed on their behalf is that the workman was allowed the CPF benefits which is admissible to the Corporation employees instead of the pensionary benefits .

19. In the cross - examination , the workman has admitted that he has received the gratuity , CPF final and leave balance encashment payments from the Corporation. The Id . representative for the workman could not be able to point out before me any rule/regulation of the Corporation which entitles the workman to get the pensionary benefits after his retirement . In Ex . M - 1 , the application for giving his option , the workman has opted for the leave , provident fund and all other terminal benefits admissible to the employees of the Corporation instead of 15. Vide order dated 25-10-97 , annexure 8 , the workman was retired and relieved w.e.f. the afternoon of 25th October, 1997 from the service of FCI . The workman has himselfadmitted that the employees of the Corporation are retired on attaining the age of 58 years and this legal position remains undisputed . Under the forgoing point , it has been decided that the workman has exercised his option for the pay scale and benefits admissible to the employees ofthe Corporation and thereafter he continuously worked under the employment of the Corporation . His letters Ex . M-2 to M -4 , wherein he has reiterated the same facts , also lead to infer that the workman had opted for the service under the Corporation . On these facts , it appears that the factum ofhis retirement w.e.f. 28-2-98 as mentioned in the letter dated 5-5-97 was inadvertently written on behalf of the Assistant Manager and simply on account of this letter it cannot be presumed that the workman had been continuing under the employment of the Food Department . Moreover , the workman has admitted in his cross- 7054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

In the matter of dispute between:

Shri Banshi Dhar Singh , C/ o Sri B. D. Tiwari , 96/196, Roshan Bajaj Lane, Ganesh Ganj , Lucknow

AND

the leave , provident fund , retirement or other terminal benefits admissible to the employees of the Central Government . As such, as per his option form Ex. M - 1 , the pensionary benefits were not admissible to him when he opted for the Corporation service. On these facts , the non- applicants succeed in establishing that the workman has obtained the CPF benefits admissible to the employees of the Corporation and in the absence of any pensionary benefits he is not entitled to get them. The point is decided accordingly.

Divisional Safety Officer, Office ofDivisional Railway Manager , N.E.R. , Ashok Marg, Lucknow

AWARD

1. Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi vide notification No. L- 41012/44/95 - IR- B- 1 dated 22-4-96 has raferred the follwing dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal

20. For the forgoing reasons , the workman could not be able to establish his claim and the reference is answered in negative against the workman in the terms thatthe workman is not entitled to be retired w.e.f. 28-2-98 and further the action of the Corporation in not allowing him pensionary benefits on the pattern of the Central Government isjustified.

21.Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17( 1 ) of the Act .

R. C. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 28 सितम्बर, 2004

"Whether the action of the Railway Administration in demoting Sh . Bansi Dhar Singh from the post of Asstt . Guard to Cabinmen and later termination his services by premature retirement is just and legal . If not , to what relief the workman concerned is entitled?"

का.आ. 2686.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एन. ई. रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- कम-लेबर कोर्ट, कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी.नं. 49/96) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-41012/44/95- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 28th September , 2004

S.O. 2686.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( ID . No. 49 of 96 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of N.E. Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-09-2004 .

[No. L -41012/44/95 - IR (B- 1 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SURESH CHANDRA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT , 117/9 , SARVODAYA NAGAR, KANPUR

2. Briefly stated facts of the case of the concerned workman is that while working as Assistant Guard having head quarter at Gonda under the Station Superintendent , N.E. Railway,Gonda he was served with a chargesheet by Shri V.K. Tewari , Divisional Safety Officer N.E. Railway Lucknow, Junction for the charge of not vacating quarter at lucknow after 18-12-86 . It has been alleged by the workman that there had been some dealing with the concerned workman and the Station Suptd. , NE Rly ,. Lucknow in connection with appointment of his son Sri Ram Singh wherein said Station Suptd. Sri G.C. Bhatnagar could not succeed as a result of which the official as aforesaid became prejudiced against the concerned workman and had also thereatened the workman for bad consequences against his service It is further stated that due to aforesaid straneous relations between the concerned workman and the said Station Suptd . , N.E. Railway, Lucknow, the workman thought it fit to get his mutual transfer with another railway employee and the said transfer was accepted by the management on 7-12-86 . Workman had also applied for mutual exchange of quarters which was also accepted by the management on the same date . It is alleged that the officer with whom the workman was having straneous relations was lateron promoted as AOS ( G - Optg ) and due to earlier prejudice the said officer any how managed to get the application for exchange of quarters reopened and rejected with effect from 4-2-87 and he also suspended the workman w.e.f. 4-2-87 . The suspension of the workman was made effective from 23-1-87 for not having vacated railway quarter at Lucknow while the applicant had moved on INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 49 OF 96 7055 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

the workman that in accordance with the manual Para 1315 the applicant was being retired from the service, without any order in writing. The workman has been verbally informed by the authorities of the Railways the workman is no longer in Railway service . It is thus claimed by the workman that he has straightway been terminated without any order in writing to that effect and a false pretence is being taken that since the workman has not given clear acceptance of a lower post on absorption by the management , therefore , there left no option with the management but to retire the workman from the service of the management. Even workman has not been provided with settlement dues . On the basis of above allegations it - has been prayed by the workman that he be reinstated on duty.

transfer to Gonda. The concerned workman replied the charges whereafter action under Disciplinary & Appeal Rules was initiated against the workman by the then Divisional Safety Officer , N.E. Railway, Lucknow by appointing AOS (Coaching ) Sri K.R. Ahirwar as Enquiry Officer for holding departmental inquiry against the workman . The workman sought relevant papers from the management in order to reply the charges from the management but the request of the workman was not acceded to . The workman was never given any notice for vacating the quarter. It is also alleged that during the course of inquiry statement of witnesses recorded during inquiry have not been provided to the workman which resulted adversely the defence of the workman . The written consent of the workman was obtained by the authorities of the Railway under duress whereupon the management managed to proceed ahead against the workman with the enquiry without providing reasonable facilities of self defence and even without providing opportunity to be defended by defence assistant and the dates ofthe inquiry were also not intimated to the applicant properly and the enquiry virtually held exparte in disregard to the principles of natural justice . Enquiry report has been submitted by the enquiry office without application ofmind and without recording a reasoned finding.

4. The claim of the workman has been contested by the management . The management filed written statement against the statement of claim of the workman wherein allegations levelled by the workman against the management have been denied venemently. It has also been pleaded by the management that there is no illegal order passed by the management against the workman . All orders passed by the authorities of the railway after due application of mind . All payment due to workman have beenmade in accordance with the rules of the railway and no cause of action has ever accrued to the workman . The management on the basis of above pleadings prayed that the claim of the workman be dismissed with cost .

5. Rejoinder statement against the written statement of the management has also been filed by the workman wherein nothing new has been mentioned except reiteration offacts already mentioned by the workman in his statement ofclaim .

6. On the basis of pleadings of the parties learned predecessor vide order dated 6-11-2000 decided the preliminary issue which was framed as under :-

Whether the domestic inquiry conducted by the management was not fair and proper ?

7. The learned predecessor while deciding the above preliminary issue recorded a finding in favour of the workman holding that the domestic inquiry against theworkman was not fairly and properly conieded by the enquiry officer and the entire inquiry proceeding stand vitiated. After the said order on preliminary issue the management was directed to substantiate the charge against the workman . The management in support of the charge has relied upon the sole oral evidence given by Sri Jawahar Ram Assistant Operational Management Movement NER Lucknow . The witness reiterated the facts contained on the basis of which the workman was finally reverted from the post of Assistant Guard to the post of 3. It has been alleged by the workman that on the basis of enquiry report the applicant was reverted as Cabinman in grade Rs . 800-1100 for three years and the workman was transferred to Gorakhpur after reversion where he joined his duties as Cabinman on 2-3-88 . The appeal of the workman against the order of punishment was rejected by the appellate authority without due application of mind and also contrary to Railway Rules . It has further been alleged by the workman that the prejudice of the concerned authorities against the workman has not stopped at this stage . Rather the workman concerned on 2-3-88 i.e. date of joining at Gorakhpur was sent for vision test before D.M.O. , Gorakhpur where the workman was kept under medical treatment upto 4-12-88 and ultimately the workman was declared medically unfit for Category A- 2 and was declared fit for Category C - 1 post . Under provisions of railway rules it is provided that when a running / operating staff is medically decategorised his pay is protected, therefore , the workman requested for protection of his pay and his posting on an alternative job of equal scale of pay but the management did not considered his request . The management attempted to absorb the workman as Daftry grade Rs . 775-1025 Running Room Servant Gr . 750-940. The management also offered the post of Running Room Cook for which the workman has not given any refusal . It is also alleged by the workman that lastly he moved an application for his absorption on any suitable post on 24-3-93 , but the management not only failed to provide any job to the applicant but has also stopped his salary w.e.f. 5-12-88 and has informed 7056

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

Cabinman and his pay was fixed at Rs . 800 per month and that the workman was transferred to Gorakhpur . As Cabinman the workman was referred for his medical test in A - 2 Category which he could not pass . He however wasdeclared fit for the post ofG - I category in the medical test and on the basis of that report the workman was again offered the post of Daftry , which he declined to jointhereafter he was served with a retirement notice/ order on 15-10-93 . This witness also admitted that workman also lodge a criminal report against this witness and others but the police did not take any action on the same .

8. In his cross - examintion this witness admitted that the workman was allowed by Sri Awadhesh Verma the then Asstt. Station Supdt . for mutual exchange of residential quarters . This witness pleaded his ignorance about the fact that whether the exchange of residential quarters by the workman was acted upon on the basis of the said order . He also admitted that if any employee does not comply with the orders of vacation of the residential quarters action by the Estate Officer can be taken against such employees and also a disciplinary action may be taken for the same . This witness clearly admitted that the workman was punished twice by the management by demoting the workman from the post of Asstt. Guard to the post of Cabinman thereby reducing the grade and after fixing the salary on lower post of Rs. 800. He was again directed to be posted as Daftry a lower grade of the post of Cabinman on account of the workman having declared unfit in the vision test of A - 1 category. This witness clearly admitted in his examination in chiefthat the evidence pertaining to the charge levelled against the workman are with the vigilance cell therefore they could not be filed.

9. The workman produced himself as W.W. I and denied the allegations and also stated that no documents were made available to him to meet the charges . This witness also stated that having failed in vision test of A.1 category he applied for his posting as Cabinmen which was lying vacant but he was not posted on any of these posts.

10. Heard the parties representatives in detail and also perused the record . The order passed on preliminary issue has also been considered .

11. It is obvious from the record that no justifiable and proper inquiry was ever conducted against the workman and he was demoted from Asstt . Guard to the post of Cabinmen and later on in the galb of being unfit to pass the category . A vision test he was again offered a

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] post of Daftry, a post below the rank of Cabinman . The management witness has admitted this fact and further admitted that he was twice demoted on one occasion on the basis of inquiry report and later on the basis of workman's failure to pass the vision test . This witress of the management has not denied the fact that an equivalent post of the grade of Cabinman were not available and the workman was directed to join the post of Daftry a grade below the rank of Cabinman when already several post of the grade of cabinmen were available as claimed by the workman . The finding on preliminary issue holding thereby unjust and improper and illegal inquiry goes to show that the action of the management in awarding punishment was not justified . Even additional evidence adduced by the management is of no help to substantiate the charges against the workman . If for the sake of arguments even if it is assumed that the workman did comply with the order of vacation of residential quarters the action of the workman can be well annulled by the state authorities under law . This fact has duly been admitted by the management witness but his statement to the effect that it was not necessary is of no help to the management . There is nothing on record to substantiate the charges framed against the workman . Therefore , on the basis of evidence on record it can safely be held that management action in demoting Sri Bansi Dhar from the postofAsstt . Guard to the post of Cabinman and later on terminating his service by premature retirement is not just and legal .

12. The workman is therefore entitled for his reinstatement.

13. In the instant case the workman admittedly has attained the age of superannuation during the pendency ofthe adjudication of the dispute. Therefore a direction to reinstate the workman on his original post is not feasible . Instead the workman would be entitled to all benefits of service of the post of Asstt . Guard till he attains the age of retirement and also the post- retirement benefits as admissible to the workman under rules as if workman has never been terminated from railway service .

14. It is also made clear that the payment made to the workman as Cabinman shall be deducted from the arrears of pay payable to the workman.

15. Reference is therefore decided in favour of the workman and against the railway management .

SURESH CHANDRA , Presiding Officer [ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 28 सितम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 2687. - औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एंड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- कम- लेबर कोर्ट, जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-22/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-9-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -12012/69/2003- आई आर ( जी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th September , 2004 S.O. 2687. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Case No. CGIT- 22/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 27-9-2004 .

[No. L- 12012/69/2003 - IR (B- 1 )]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

Case No. GCIT- 22/2004 . Reference No. L - 12012/69/2003-1R (B- 1 ) Shri Attar Singh ,

S/o Sh . Sumeraram , Village Singhan Kheda , Tehsil Bayana,

.... Applicant Distt . Bharatpur - 321001 .

Versus

1. The General Manager ,

State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur , C-Scheme, Jaipur-302001.

2. The Manager , State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur , Bayana Branch ,

..Non - applicants Distt. Bharatpur-321001 .

PRESENT :

Sh . R.C. Sharma.

Presiding Officer:

3050 G1 /04-25A

7063

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

None .

Fortheapplicant:

Forthe non - applicant: Sh .Anurag Aggarwal Date of award :

15-9-2004

AWARD

1. The Central Government in exercise of the pow.s referred under Clause D of sub- section 1 to Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( for short , ' the Act' ) has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, which runs as under :--

"Whether action of the management of State Bank Bikaner and Jaipur, Jaipur in terminating the services of Shri Attar Singh S/o Shri Sumeraram w.e.f. 29-8-2001 without serving any notice , notice pay or retrenchment compensation isjustified? If not, to what reliefthe disputant concerned is entitled ? "

2. The workman has stated in his statement of claim that he was appointed by the non - applicant bank as a 4th Class ernployee on 1-8-96 who continuously worked upto 28-8-2001 , but on 29-8-2001 his service was terminated without giving him one month's notice or the wages in lieu ofsuch notice and the compensation amount . He has further stated that after terminating his service , the fresh hand viz. , Sh . Jaidev Sharma has been employed by the non- applicant bank . He has prayed that the termination order may be set aside and he be reinstated in the service with its continuity and all consequential benefits.

3. On 14-9-2004 , at the stage of filing the counter statement on behalf of the non - applicants , none appeared onbehalf of the workman . No reasonable ground has been assigned on behalf of the workman for his non - appearance before this Court. It , therefore , appears that the workman is not interested in further contesting his claim.

4.Accordingly , a " No Dispute Award" is passed in thismatter .

5. Let a copy ofthe award may be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17 ( 1 ) of the Act .

R.C. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 सितम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 2688.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 53/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-9-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/ 180/98- आई आर ( बी-11 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव 7058

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 28th September , 2004 S.O. 2688. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 53/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Kanpur ( U.P. ) now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 28-09-2004.

[No. L - 12012/ 180/98 - IR (B - II ) ]

C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA HJS , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, SARVODAYA NAGAR, HOTEL KISHOREE , KANPUR, U.P.

Industrial Dispute No. 53 of 99

In the matter of dispute between :

Shri Badloo son of Sh . Maiku Lal Mohalla Miya Tola , Kasba Konda Jahanabad District Fatehpur U.P.

AND

The Regional Manager Central Bank of India , Regional Office , Pandu Nagar , Kanpur -208 005

AWARD

1. The Central Government , Ministry ofLabour, New Delhi , vide notification No. L - 12012/ 180/ 98 IR ( B- II) dated 8-3-99, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in terminating the services of Sh . Badloo w.e.f. 22-1-98 is justified ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled for ?"

2. The case in short , relating to the present dispute as set up by the concerned workman , is that he was appointed by the opposite party bank on 1-6-93 at the post of peon- cum-daftry at bank's Laluganj Konda Jahanabad Branch to perform the work of permanent nature . Initially the concerned workman was used to be paid Rs . 10/- per day as daily rate wage which was enhanced to Rs . 12 /- per day and subsequently in the year 1998-99 the wages of the workman were again enhanced and he used to be paid his daily wages at the rate of Rs . 15 /- per

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] day. The bank also used to pay the wages through vouchers / cheques and wages were used to be paid to the workman on monthly basis . It has also been alleged by the workman that vouchers were being written by the branch manager/ accountant of the bank and work of supply of water , sweeping the branch were being shown for making the payment to the concerned workman and the workman was also used to make initials in the name of others at the back of the vouchers . The workman has further alleged that since he had performed the work of permanent nature but he had been deprived of wages as is given to the regular and permanent employee of the same category in the branch . The action of the bank attracts the provisions of unfair labour practice . It has also been alleged by the bank that when the officers of the bank failed to fulfil their assurance , the workman through UTUC served a notice regarding regularising his service as permanent employee which annoyed the bank as a result of which he was removed from service with effect from 22-1-98 . Workman has further stated that after the termination of the service of the workman the bank appointed fresh hands for the job which was being performed by the workman . The workman has also pleaded breach of provisions of Section 25F and 25G of the I.D. Act , and on the basis of these allegations the workman has prayed that the action of the management be declared as unjust and he be reinstated in the service of the bank with full back wages and all consequential benefits.

3. The claim of the workman was contested by the management and the management has filed their reply wherein it has been stated by the bank that the workman was engaged as casual labour for few days for bringing water which work was intermittent , occasional and of fluctuating nature as per exigencies of the bank on the basisof no work no pay . The workman did not hold any regular and permanent post in the bank in any cadre . Workmanwas also not require to mark his attendance and hewas attending the casual work at his own sweetwill . The workman was never issued any appointment letter by the bank for any post nor any termination letter was issued by the bank and that the workman had never worked for 240 days in any calendar year preceding 12 months .

4. It has been denied by the bank that it ever terminated the services of the concerned workman . The engagement of the workman was on day to day basis . The workman lastly engaged on 21-1-98 whereafter he left the job of his own accord w.e.f. 22-1-98 and the service condition are not applicable on the workman . The further allegation of the management is that recruitment in the bank is done as per recruitment rules and that the name of

3050 Gl/04-25B [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

workman served the management with a notice on the advise of President of UTUC in the month of January, 98 under certificate of posting. The management on receipt of this notice terminated the services of the workman we.f. 22-1-98.

9. The management has denied all these allegations and stated that the engagement of the workman was done on casual basis on daily rate or as casual worker due to exigencyofwork.

the workman was never sponsored by the employment exchange . It has been alleged that Sri Suttan Lal Saini was already engaged as a regular and permanent peon at bank's KoraJahanabad in District Fatehpur during the period 1993 to 1998 therefore , question ofengaging the concemed workman as peon on permanent and regular basis does not arise . The workman is trying to seek back door entry by way of litigation Bank has further denied the allegation that the workntan had ever been made payment in the fictituous names and the workman has been paid wages for the actual days he worked in the branch on casual basis . The workman has never worked on full time basis as peon- cum-daftari in the bank. The workman worked as casual labour for bringing water in Kora Jahanabad Branch ofthe bank . On the basis of these allegations it has been prayed that the claim of the workman be dismissed as the workman is not entitled for any relief.

5. Rejoinder statement has also been filed by the workman against the written statement ofthe bank wherein nothing new has been pleaded . except reiterating the facts already alleged by the workman in the statement of claim.

6: The workman Badloo examined himself to prove his case of his employment and retrenchment from service by the management as aforesaid . Contrary to it the management has produced Sri C.K. Shukla Ex - Branch Manager , of Central Bank of India and also Sri Suttan Lal Saini another employee of the bank to rebut the contention ofthe workman and to support the case of the management . Both the parties have lead oral as well documentary evidence in support of their respective case .

7. Heard the authorised representatives for the parties at length and have also perused the record carefully.

10. Considering the rival contentions of the parties it has to be seen whether the workman has worked regularly for more than three years period as claimed by the workman without any interruption . In this regard the workman has only relied on his solitary statement . The photocopies of the documents filed on behalf of the workman have been denied and not admitted by the management . The workman has not attempted to prove all these documents with any other evidence . The workman himself has filed a photocopy alleged statement of payments made in the month of July , August to the workman Badloo Prased and also in subsequent months to Sri Ramadhin , Ram Kishore, Shyam Lal , Saheb Lal Amarsingh etc. Again in the month of February 1995 Badloo Prased was paid for 25 days . The Statement of payment filed by the workman goes to support the case of the management that service of different casual labourers were utilized by the management as per exigency of work. It has been urged by the management that daily wager or casual labour cannot be regularised nor they have any right to the post as has been held by the Hon'ble High Court (Div . Bench ) in a case of Rajesh Kumar Awasthi versus D.F.O. Special Forestry Division and others reported in1993 (Vol . 66 ) FLR 613. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi versus State of Biharand another reported in 1997 (Vol 76 ) FLR page 237 has clearly laid down that the services of a daily wager if terminated he had no right to the post and his case can noted by treated under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has also laid down the law that the workman engaged on the basis of exigency or need of the workthey are temporary employees working on daily wages under these circumstances their disengagement from service cannot be construed to be retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The concept of retrenchment therefore , cannot be strech upto such extent as to cover theseemployees .

11. In the present case the workman is admittedly a daily wager employee and therefore , he has no right to the post.

12. The next contention advanced by the workman is thathe had worked for more than three years and has also 8. It has been contended on behalf of the workman thatthe workman has worked with the management ofthe bank from 1-6-93 to 21-1-98 in continuity as a peon - cum- daftry ofthe bank .. It has also been contended on behalf of theworkman that the services of the workman commenced atthe rate of Rs . 10/ - per day which were lateron increased to Rs . 12/- per month and again in the year 1998-99 the daily rate were enhanced to Rs /- 15 per day as wages which was paid to the workman on monthly basis . In his claim statement the workman has admitted that all the payment were made to the workman through vouchers and that the vouchers used to be prepared either in the name of the workman or in the name of others and payments were made to the workman after his signatures . The workman continued in the engagement on the assurance of the management that the services of the workman will be regularised and made permanent after completion ofthree years as daily wager . On expiry of this assurance the 7060

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

ofthe workman that he was never issued any appointment letter nor served with any termination letter in writing. Daily and casual workers who are engaged in disregard of all rules cannot be allowed to enter in the service from back door and the labour court cannot be allowed to be used as means for such back door entry . The Hon'ble High Court , Allahabad in a case reported in 1999 Vol . 81 FLR 319between State of U.P. and Labour Court Haldwani and other has clearly laiddown that a daily and casual workers who are engaged in disregard of all rules cannot be allowed to enter in service through back door . The facts of the present case appears to be similar and therefore as per has own contentions raised through statement of claim filed by him is that he had worked on daily wages with the assurance that his services will be regularised and on failure he had served a notice and thereafter the services were terminated by the management . Thus it is a clear case of an attempt of the workman to make this entry in the service of the bank through back door which cannot be permitted under the law .

completed more than 240 days of service preceding one year from the date of his retrenchment or alleged date of termination , he is entitled for the relief as laid down under provisions of Section 25F and 25H ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. In this context the workman as has already stated above , has relied on his solitary statement which has been vehemently rebutted by the management witnesses . The workman himself has admitted in his cross examination that the management witness Suttan Lal Saini had worked with the bank during the period his engagement as daily wager . Even in the rejoinder filed by the workman it has been admitted that Sri Suttan Lal Saini regular peon was working with the bank and one Sri Kunji Lal joined the bank on his transfer from Varanasi in the year 1996. Therefore , the onus lies on the workman to prove that he had worked with the bank for more than 240 days . The submission put by the management also finds support from the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case between Rain Forest Officer and ST Hadimany reported in 2000 ( Vol . 94) FLR 622 .

15. For the reasons stated above it is established that the workman has not been enable to prove that he had ever been employed by the management on regular basisafter following due process of law and that he had. worked for more 240 days regularly on the job preceding the date of his alleged retrenchment. In the absence of prove as above the workman is not entitled for any relief whatsoever.

13. On behalf of the workman the law reported in 1999 Vol . 81 FLR page 746 between Smishtha Dubey Versus State Board Etawah and others decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been relied on. In this case Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that the Municipal Board can be treated as Industry within the meaning of the said word in Sec . 2(k ) ofU.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In the present case there is no dispute that the bank is an Industry. Therefore , so far as this case law relied on by the workman is concerned there cannot be a dispute that the workman or the bank is not an Industry.

16. It is , therefore , held that the action of the management in terminating the services of the workman witheffectfrom 22-1-98 is not unjustified. The workman is. therefore, not entitled for any relief.

SURESH CHANDRA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2004

का.आ. 2689, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन एयर लाइंस लि. , के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जयपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 14/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल-11012/31/96- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2004 14. The workman has attempted in vain to take shelter of provisions of Section 6 ( p ) of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on the ground that after the termination of the services of the workman management bank engaged other persons . It may be reiterated that the workman has not adduced any evidence in this regard to substantiate his contention . As against it is admitted case of the workman in his oral testimony that Sri Saini and another were already in the continuous service during his engagement with the bank . Therefore , no advantage of provisions of Section 25F and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , can also he given to the workman as claimed by him . As such when two permanent employee of the same category were available with the bank in its branch it is not established as to why the bank management would appoint another person for the same job and that too without taking recourse of their established procedure of recruitment through authorised persons/ officers of the bank . The workman has not been able to prove the case that he was a valid appointed person . On the contrary it is the admitted case

S.O. 2689.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7061 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 14/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Airlines Ltd. , and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 23-09-2004.

[No. L- 11012/31 /96- IR (C- I ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

2. The claimant in her statement of claim has petitioned that she was appointed by the non - applicant management on 8-6-93 as bilingual typist for full time on the payment of wages @ Rs . 75/ - per day, who conti- nuously worked up to 10-4-96 . Her wages were increased to the tune of Rs . 85 / - per day subsequently, but she was refused to join the duty on 11-4-96 . She has further stated that she has completed over 240 days whose service was terminated in violation of Section 25 - F of the . Act. She has also averred that one Sh . Om Prakash Sharma wasappointed after her termination without affording her an opportunity of employment . She has prayed that the termination order dated 11-4-96 be cancelled and she may be reinstated in the service with its continuity and back- wages .

Case No. CGIT - 14/2003

Reference No. L- 11012/31 /96- IR (C - I )

Kumari Chandra Alwani

D/ o Sh . B. C. Alwani ,

Quarter No. 504 ,

3. The non- applicants their written statement have disputed the claim and have stated that she was engaged as a part -time contractual bilingual typist at a consolidated payment of Rs . 50/- per day , who worked only for 2-3 hours a day.

......Applicant

Raja Park, Sindhi Colony, Adarsh Nagar , Jaipur

Versus

1. Station Manager,

4. On 1-9-2004, at the stage of submitting her affidavit in evidence , none was present on behalf of the workman . No reason could be assigned for her absence . It appears that the workman is not interested to further contest her case . Therfore , a ' No Dispute Award ' is passed inthe matter.

Indian Airlines Ltd. , Nehru Comple. Tonk Road, Jaipur.

5. Let a copy of the award may be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17 ( 1) of the Act.

2.General Manager (Personnel) , Indian Airlines (Northern Region ) ,

R. C. SHARMA , Presiding Officer S. JungAirport , New Delhi - 110003 .

......Non - applicants

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2004 PRESENT :

Slı . R. C. Sharma .

PresidingOfficer :

None .

Forthe applicant :

Sh. Deepak Choudhry

Forthe non - applicants :

08-09-2004

Date of award

AWARD

का.आ. 2690.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन एयर लाईस लि. , के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली -11 के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 101/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं० एल -11012/25/93- आई आर ( विविध ) ( सी-1 ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी 1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers referred under Clause D of sub- section 1 & sub- section 2 (A) to Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( for short , the Act ' ) has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , which runs as under :-

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2004

S.O. 2690.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central "क्याइण्डियन एयरलाईंस लिमिटेड , जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र द्वारा कर्मकार सुश्री चंद्रा अलवानी , स्टैनो टाइपिस्ट की सेवा दिनांक 10-4-96 से समाप्त किया जाना विधिवत , उचित एवं न्यायसंगत है ? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस राहत की पात्र है ? " 7062

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

work duty from 19-12-1992 without any notice and retrenchment compensation. He has worked for 240days so he deserves to be reinstated .

Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 101/95 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , New Delhi - 11 now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Airlines , and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 23-09-2004.

[No. L- 11012/25/93-1R(VIVIDH) (C-I)]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER :

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement, it has been stated that the Hon'ble High Court vide its order dt . 13-5-1991 held that the claimant was acting as an independent contractor and had been collecting money from repairing the vehichles and dismised the writ petition filed by the claimant. It has been further stated that the workman was given the duty of repairing the vehicles and he charged money for the work done and he was to enter Airlines so he was given pass . In 1991 , his case has been rejected by the Hon'ble High Court and he has been treated as Mechanic to repair the vehicles and got money for his durty .

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI

The workman has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder , he has reiterated the averments of his statement ofclaim.

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI

I. D. No. 101/95

SH . JAIPAL SHARMA

Versus

INDIAN AIRLINES LTD.

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/25 / 93 - IR ( VIVIDH ) ( C- 1 ) Central Government Dt. 03-11-1995 has referred the followings point for adjudication.

The point truns as hereunder :-

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side of the workman that he has been issued pass on 6-1-1990 and payments have been made to him upto 1-1-1990 . He has not filed any paper which shows he has received any payment after the order of the Hon'ble High Court. The Hon'ble High Court has specifically held that the claimant was acting as independent contractor and had been collecting money for repairing the vehicles , copies of the estimate admittedly signed by the claimant and payment of bills for those amounts are on record . When his writ was dismised on 13-5-1991 , then he took up a case of work of 240 days upto 19-12-1992 but he has not filed any paper to prove his contention . all the papers which he has filed are of1990 whereas the Hon'ble High Court rejected his writ petition on 13-5-1991 . As such , the claimant has not succeeded in establishing his case that he worked for 240 days after his writ petition was dismised by the Hon'ble High Court . So he is not entitled to any relief as prayed for.

"Whether the claim of Shri Jaipal Sharma is justified that the management of Indian Airlines now Indian Airlines Ltd. illegally terminated his services on 19-12-1992 after continuously employing him for over 240days? If so , to what relief Shri Jaipal Sharma is enutled.

The reference is replied thus :-

The claim of Shri Jaipal Sharma is not justified that the management of Indian Airlines now Indian Airlines Ltd. , illegaly terminated his services on 19-12-1992 after continuouslyemploying him for over 240 days . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

Theaward is given accordingly .

Dt. 16-9-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer The claimant has stated in his statement of claim that he was appointed as Technician in the year 1982 with the management as is evident from the Register of Employment and remuneration - cum-paid vouchers and daily permits (copies annexure A, B & C) . He performed technical duties of welder, carpenter , fitter and mechanic and had no control or supervision over the work of any other employee as none worked under him , as he was a workman under Section 2 (s) of the ID Act, 1947. The management after 10 years of service refused to him the 7063 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2004

Patna and their workman Sri Dinesh Singh represented by Life Insurance Workers ' Union , Patna for adjudication to this Tribunals :

"Whether the action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India in terminating the services of Sh . Dinesh Singh is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the said workman is entitled ?" का. आ. 2691.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनकै कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण, पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 6 ( C) /98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-17012/65/97- आई.आर. ( बी. II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 30th September, 2004

2. It is one of such cases wherein the parties although filed written statement puting forward their case butlater withdrew themselves from contest . None of them has adduced any evidence whatsoever . Since the validity oftermination of the worker Sri Dinesh Singh is in dispute it was entirely on his shoulders to establish his claim , but surprising enough he has backed out and even left attending the Court since 31-8-2000 . His lawyer was although informed vide order dated 5-2-2004 but to no effect.

S.O. 2691.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 6 (C)/98) of the Industrial Tribunal , Patna (Bihar ) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 28-09-2004.

[No. L- 17012/65/97- IR (B - II ]

C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

3. Worker's case is that he was appointed by concerned authority and worked at Dehri - on - Sone Life Insuarance Corporation as Class IV employee since March , 1990.He worked continuously for three years without any charge and blemishes . The management illegally terminated his services in utter violation of various provisions u/s . 25F.N. & H. of Industrial Disputes Act and resorted to unfair labour practice . He accordingly prayed for reinstatement with back wages .

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA

Reference Case No. 6C of 1998 .

4. As per management, the worker was appointed purely on casual basis whenever arose such exigency and he was paid for the work done on day to day basis . He never worked for 240 days in any block of 12 months . He was given a chance for appointment alongwith others in the year 1992 but he failed to qualify. In view of all above, themanagement alleges that he is not entitled to any relief.

Management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, Patna and their workman Sri Dinesh Singh , represented by the General Secretary , Life Insurance Worker'sUnion , Patna .

Sri S.K. Prasad , Advocate .

For the Management :

For the Workman : Sri Ashok Kumar Sinha , Advocate .

Present :

: Priya Saran , Presiding Officer , Industrial Tribunal , Patna

AWARD

Patna , dated the 24th September, 2004

5. We have already noted that in the light of the dispute and issue underlying therein it was incumbent on the worker alone to establish his claim for getting the relief he has sought for . Since , no material whatsoever either oral or documentary has been brought on record in support ofhis claim basides he has totally left participation in the proceeding for more than four years . I have no hesitation in inferring that the worker has no case at all nor a dispute assuch ever existed for awarding any relief to him. He has not proved that he was appointed by the Life Insurance Corporation and he served at Dehri - on- Sone since March , 1990 with his entitlement for reinstatement . The result is in absence of any evidence that the worker has not established his case nor his claim deserves any consideration as prayed in his written statement .

6. To sum up I would say that and hold as'such that no violation of any legal provision has been proved inthe alleged termination of worker's service by the Life By the adjudication order No. L- 17012 / 65 /97 - IR (B - 11 ) dated the 31st March , 1998 the Government of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi has referred, under Clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter to he referred to as ' the Act ) , the following dispute between the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, 7064

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA:OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART 11--SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

AND

Insurance Corporation and he is not entitled to any relief whatsoever .

1. The General Manager , : II Party/Management 7. Award accordingly.

Southern Railway, Chennai .

PRIYA SARAN, Presiding Officer

2. The Divisional Railway , Manager , Southern Railway, Trichy .

नई दिल्ली, 1 अक्तूबर , 2004

3. The Divisional Mechanical Engineer , Diesel Shed, Southern Railway, Trichy .

APPEARANCE :

Forthe Workman : M/ s. M. Rathinasabapathy, K.Anbarasan &

K. Thangapandi, Advocate. का. आ. 2692.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, सार्दन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. 60/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

For the Management: Mr. P. Arulmudi , Advocate .

AWARD

[सं. एल-41012/178/2002 - आईआर( बी. 1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 1st October , 2004

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L -41012/ 178/2002 - IR (B- 1 ) dated 28-03-2003 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication :

"Whether the order of Compulsory Retirementfrom service imposed on Shri R. Santhanakrishnan by themanagement of Southern Railway, Trichy is legal and justified and if so , what relief the workman is entitled?"

S.O. 2692.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Laddustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.60/ 2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal , Patna/ Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Southern Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 30-09-2004 .

2. After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 60/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

[No. L -41012/ 178 /2002- IR ( B - I ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI

Tuesday, the 27th July , 2004

PRESENT: K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 60/2003

( the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of the General Manager , Southern Railway , Chennai and their workman)

BETWEEN :.

Sri R. Santhanakrishnan : 1 Party/ Petitioner

The Petitioner was appointed as Kalasi in Railways on6-12-63 at the age of 18 and due to his hard work and sincerity he was promoted to Grade 1 Fitter in the year 1988 and he was working in that post for more than 12 years . As he was a trade union leader , he solved several problems of staff across the table , even though his union was not recognised . While so , to his surprise and shock he was compulsorily retired on 10-4-2001 , while he was having four years of service for his regular superannuation . Nodoubt, under Rule 1802 ( a )/ 1803 (a ) read with para 620 ( ii) of Manual of Pension Rules - 1950/ 1804( a ) of Indian Railways Establishment Code Vol . Il the petitioner was compulsorily retired , the order passed by the authorities areillegal . Till the compulsory retirement, he has rendered unblemished record of service without even a single adverse remarks . The Petitioner has submitted representation to Senior DME Diesel Shed , GOC Trichy dated 24-1-2001 for which a reply was received rejecting his claim . Though there is a rule to compulsorily retire an employee on the basis of public interest , the appointing 7065 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

authority should have given sufficient and satisfying reasons that in what way his performance affects the public interest . But, the order passed by the authorities was without giving any genuine reason and opportunity , therefore, it is illegal and violation of principles of natural justice and also arbitrary one. it is well established by the Apex Court and High Courts that the order of compulsory retirement shall not be passed as a short cut to avoid departmental enquiry when such course is more desirable . Therefore , the order of compulsory retirement in this case is not only unlawful but also motivated, therefore , the said order is invalid as being inconsistent withArticle 311 ( 2) of the Constitution . On 29-9-2000 an accident was taken place near Panruti in which the Mechanical Shed has changed the number in the loco so as to prove the derailed loco was in good fettle , it means the reasons for derailment would be defective track . However, this impersonation of loco was discovered by the Engineering Department and an enquiry was conducted and this was also publihsed in newspapers . As a consequential effect , the then Senior DME Diesel Shed Mr. Uma Shankar had been transferred to Mysore and the then AME Mr. Johnson was asked to go on voluntary retirement , then the DME Mr. Chandrasekaran was transferred to Diesel Workshop at Ponmalai . Only to victimize for this , the superior officers have taken action against the Petitionr and compulsorily retired him . The order of compulsory retirement passed is without any basis and therefore , it is not valid in law . Further , the authorities concocted stories to justify their action is unlawful and it is clearly proved that the compulsory retirement against the Petitioner has been ordered with ill motivation and further to curb the trade union activities and also to create terror among the co - workers . The petitioner who is a trade union leader in an unrecognised union was able to solve certain co - workers problems in amicable way across the table , hence the majority of the workers were behind him for which the recognised union leaders got worried and lodged false complaints against the Petitioner which resulted for his compulsory retirement . In addition to this , he was accustomed to represent the attitude of indiscipline and corrupt practices against the recognised union leaders and they have succeeded in their attempt by influencing the officials . Therefore , for all these reasons , the petitioner prays to pass an award to reinstate the petitioner into service with all attendant benefits from the date of compulsory retirement and pass such other further relief.

diesel shed at Ponmalai he served without any complaint, his performance was continuously below average. In the field work also , it was observed that he was not used to co -operate with the supervisors in discharging the assigned job. Further , he was unwilling to shoulder higher responsibilities which he was supposed to discharge as a highly skilledGrade I Fitter and he was not dependable for entrusting job related to safety aspects pertaining to the maintenance of locomotives in diesel shed , Ponmalai . It is further alleged that in spite of continuous personal counselling during various spells , the Petitioner was not mentally in a position to change his attitude for improving hisperformance towards betterment of the system . Further , it is also contended that he also used to be very careful and shrewd enough in avoiding a situation which would have otherwise led to disciplinary action . Further , the Petitioner used to instigate the staff directly to work against the system and that was an indication to cause commotion and unrest in diesel shed floor. Due to this attitude , the section supervisors were unable to allot him any safety oriented work pertaining to maintenance of locomotives as they strongly felt that he would play a mischievous role hampering the safety of the locomotives . It is also noted that the Petitioner involved in man handling of his own colleagues of diesel shed by using diesel components as a weapon for fight . During the year ending 1998 , 1999 and 2000 the annual confidential reports and reports of Petitioner would show that the Petitioner had not improved his quality of work and did not discharge and perform his duties with devotion to duty , efficiency and sincerity . Therefore , as per provisions contained in Rule 1802( a ) and 1802( b ) of Indian Railway Establishment Code Vol . II , the appointing authority has passed an order to retire him compulsorily and his case was referred to review committee for scrutiny of performance of duty and quality of work and on the basis of the recommendation of Review Committee the Petitioner was to be prematurely retired . ThePetitioner was provided with an opportunity to explain against the proposed action of premature retirement and he had submitted his representation dated 24-1-2001 accepting the premature retirement under provisions . Therefore , the Petitioner was prematurely retired by terminating his service w.e.f. 10-4-2001 . It is in consonance with rules and provisions laid down by Indian Railways Establishment Code Vol . II and also the same is in order. Therefore, the Petitioner is not entitled for the relief of reinstatement , continuity of service and back wages as sought for by him . Therefore , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

5. In these circumstances , the points for my consideration are-

(i) "Whether the order of compulsory retirement from service imposed on the Peititoner by the II Party /Management is legal and justified?

4. As against this , the II Party/ Management in its Counter Statement alleged that the Petitioner cannot raise and agitate the matter of premature retirement from service before this Tribunal , as the subject matter comes within the purview of Service Matters as defined under Section 3 (q) of Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985. The Petitioner thought alleged that during his tenure of his service in 7066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (ii) To what relief, the Petitioner is entitled ? "

Point No. 1 : -

rivalry and also victimisation , he has not produced any solid proof to substantiate his claim. Though he has examined one person Mr. Sankaranaryanan namely WW2 , on perusal of oral evidence adduced on the side of the Petitioner , I find it is not establsihed that the Petitioner was victimized and made as a scapegoat for all these reasons and nodocumentary proof was produced before this Tribunal to substantiate the contention of the Petitioner .

6. The main contention of the Petitioner in this case is that the order passed by the 11 Party/ Management compulsorily retireing him from service was passed with an ill - motivation particularly to curb his trade union activities and also to create terror among the co- workers , therefore , it is unlawful , motivated and invalid and inconsistent with Article 311 ( 2 ) of the Constitution . To substantiate his claim , the Petitioner has examined himself as WWI and also examined one Mr. Sankaranarayanan as WW2 . On his side , he has marked documents Ex . W1 to W7 and on the side of the Respondent/ Management one Mr. Rajendra Prasad who is working as Welfare Inspector wasexamined as MWI and on the side of the Respondent, seven documents namely Ex . MI to M7 were marked. On behalf of the Petitioner , it is contended that the Petitioner was holding the post of Assistant General Secretary in the Southern Railway Employees Union , which is a registered trade union , though unrecognised. The Petitioner served in the union and helped his colleagues . There were some ill - feelings between the recognised union such as SRMU and SRES with the Petitioner's Union . Therefore , due to inter- party rivalry and on the instigation of the recognised union , the Petitioner was sent out of service on compulsory retirement . Usually , the recognised union leaders were not doing their work properly and further, it is not possible to extract work from them . This sort of lapse on the part of recognised union leaders were raised time and again by the Petitioner and as a result , enmity was windened between the recognised union leaders and the Petitioner and this was the root cause for sending the Petitioner on compulsory retirement . Further, during 2000, the Tripathi Express train engine had derailed near Panruti and the deraleid loco was re - railed and brought to diesel shed at Ponmalai for examination and related enquiry . At that time, the loco people wanted to escape from the derailment have impersonated another loco , which was stationed at the loco shed, But, it was discovered subsequently by the Engineering Department and the matter was also brought to the higher ups and this fact also was published in newspapers . As a consequential for this , several senior officers have been transferred from the station . But , the affected persons were under wrong impression that the Petitioner only has released this fact to the press and also to Engineering department and therefore , the Petitioner was made as a scapegoat and victimisedby way of compulsory retirement .

8. Then , the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that as per Railway Board's orders , an employee can be compulsorily retired by the appointing authority under certain circumstances , the only phrase mentioned in that Rule " Public Interest" has no definition in the statute book. Hence , order of compulsory retirement is contraryto Board's order and against the natural justice and further, it is settled by Apex Court and High Courts judgements that railway servant should not be compulsory retired on the ground of specific acts of misconduct as short cut to initiating action under DAR. Further, it was held innumber ofjudgements that when an employee is to compulsorily retired , the entire performance of his full service is to be assessed and if there is no progress , then only the extreme step of compulsory retirement that too under Article 311 by giving reasonable opportunity has to be effected. But, in this case, in the order except he was compulsorily retired in public interest , no reason was stated by the appointing authority . Further, though it is stated that the performance of Petitioner was below average in the Annual Confidential Reports , the Respondent/ Management had never pointed out the poor performance ofthe Petitioner at any point of time during the Petitioner's 37 years of service except the last two years of confidential reports . Even for these adverse confidential reports , the Petitioner has given representation to the adverse remarks , But, till now, the Respondent/Management has not given any reply and therefore , it cannot be presumed that the performance of the Petitioner was below average . It is an admitted fact that no charge sheet was given to the Petitioner with regard to his performance . Under such circumstances , except the adverse confidential report that too for the years 1999 and 2000 , there was no adverse remarks against his long past service . Under such circumstances , adverse remarks made by the officers was onlyto victimize the Petitioner for the reasons stated above. Further , the Senior Section Engineer ( Loco Foreman ) is having some unlawful dealings with the recognised union leaders who are all money lenders and only on their ill- adverse , the Senior Section Engineer had gone to the extent of saying that the performance of Petitioner is below average . Under such circumstances , no inference can be 7. But , though the Petitioner alleged that the order of compulsory retirement was based on the inter - party 7067 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

drawn from the adverse remarks made by the Senior Section Engineer.

9. But , I find though on behalf of the Petitioner, these allegations were made , there is nothing to show that the Senior Section Engineer ( Loco Foreman) had made these adverse remarks on the instigation of recognized union leaders . Further , the Petitioner in his cross examination has admitted that he has no enmity against the Respondent/Management . Under such circumstances , I find these allegations on behalf of the Petitioner are made only as an afterthought .

10. Further , it was argued on behalf of the Petitioner that the order of complusory retirement was issued by the Senior DME only on the personal vengeance and also on biased nature therefore , it is highly illegal and there is no justification on the part of the Respondent/Management.

11. But, as I have already stated that so many allegations were made against the Senior DME , the appointing authority and since the Petitioner has admitted that he has no enmity with the Senior DME . , I find there is no proof to show that the Senior DME has passed the order impugned on the ground of biased nature .

further retention in railways . It is also argued on behalf of the Respondent that Petitioner is trying to confuse the confidential report and compulsory retirement. In the confidential report it is mentioned that his work is below average and further his superior officers have mentioned that he was unwilling to shoulder higher responsibilities which he was supposed to discharge as a highly skilled Grade I Fitter and further he was not dependable for entrusting job related to safety aspects pertainingto the maintenance of locomotives in diesel shed , Ponmalai . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the order passed by the concerned authority is illegal . It is further argued that even for the notice issued by the Respondent/ Management dated 9-1-2001 , the Petitioner in his representation dated 24-1-2001 , a copy ofwhich is marked as Ex. W4 , has not challenged the order of the Respondent . Further, he represented in the letter dated 24-1-2001 that he is accepting the order passed by the authorities . Though he has stated that it was obtained by coercion and undue influence , there is no proof to substantiate this contention ofthe Petitioner . Further , it is made only as an afterthought . Since the premature retirement order was not passed under Discipline & Appeal Rules , and the order was passed in public interest by the competent authority , the Petitioner cannot challenge the same before thisTribunal . This decision was taken by the competent authority as a policy decision based on the subject into the satisfaction of the concerned authority and also based on the work performance of the employee namely the Petitioner herein over a period of time , under such circumstances , it cannot be questioned before this Tribunal . It is further argued on behalf of the Respondent that under the provisions of Indian Railways Establishment Code , this compulsory retirement is squarely covered by the.. definition of service matter under section 3 (q) of Administrative Tribunal Act , 1985. Further , the Petitioner has not alleged any violation of provisions under Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Therefore , Industrial Dispute Act isnot applicable in respect of the employees to whom fundamental and supplementary rules , Civil Service (Classification , Control & Appeal ) Rules apply. In this case , since the Petitioner has not alleged any violation under Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , he cannot file this Claim Statement before this Tribunal .

13. But as far as this contention is concerned , the Respondent has not established that the Petitioner cannot challenge the order impugned of the Respondent/ Management before this Tribunal . Further , the Respondent has not stated under which provisions of the Act, it is barred . Under such circumstances , I am not accepting the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent 12. As against this, the learned counsel for the Respondent/Management has argued that the decision under Indian Railways Establishment Code , the competent authority can exercise powers based on the subject and satisfaction arrived on the basis of work, conduct and performance of Railway servants . It is only review of the Petitioner's work for certain period and therefore, if the Petitioner wants to complain against the orders of the competent authority , he must establish before this Court the malafide on the part of the authority or to prove that order was founded on the misconduct . But, in this case, the Petitioner has admitted that he has no enmity against the officer , who has passed this order. Further, he has not attributed any motive on the said officer . Therefore , he has not established the alleged malafide on the part ofthe authority or he has not substantiated his contention that the order was passed in a biased nature . Under such circumstances , he cannot question the order passed by the competent authority in this matter. Further, it was also argued on behalf of the Respondent that though the Petitioner alleged that he has got unblemished record of service , from the records produced by the Respondent namely copy of service book of the Petitioner , it is clear that he was punished for some misconduct and further the Petitioner's work and performance were found to be unsatisfactory and it was also found that he is unfit for 7068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

W6 with regard to this matter . But, with regard to the contention of the Petitioner, since he has not established before this Tribunal that the competent authority has not passed the order as per the provisions/ rules , I find the competent authority has got every right to pass an order of compulsory retirement by assessing the individual's work performance and also by satisfying the continuance of individual's services . In this case since the competent authority after satisfying the work performance of the Petitioner over a period of time and also after perusing the confidential reports of the superior officers , has passed the order against the Petitioner compulsorily retiring him from service , which was also approved by the review Committee and therefore , under such circumstances , I find in this case the order passed by the competent authority of the Respondent/ Management is legal and justified . Therefore , I find this point against the Petitioner .

Point No. 2 :--

W7 The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

14. In view of my above findings that the order passed by the Respondent/Management against the Petitioner is legal and justified , I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief. No Costs .

Ex.No.

15. Thus , the reference is disposed of accordingly .

M2 (Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 27th July , 2004.)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

M3 Witnesses Examined :-

For the I Party/Workman: WW1 Sri R.

Santhanakrishnan WW2 Sri R.

Sankaranarayanan

M5 For the II Party/

: MWI Sri Rajendra Prasad Management

Documents Marked :-

M6 For the I Party/Workman :-

Ex. No.

Date Description

M7 WI series(3 ) Nil Xerox copy ofthe medical receipt , charge sheet and proceedings of Sr. DME Diesal , Ponmalai .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

W2Series(3 ) Xerox copy of the charge sheet representation of Petitioner and letter of Sr. DME Diesal, Ponmalai .

Nill Xerox copy of the Indian Railways Establishment Code Vol. 11 ( two pages )

24-01-01 Xerox copy of the representation given by the Petitioner

16-03-01 Xerox copy of the reply given by the Respondent

09-04-01 Xerox copy of the order of compulsory retirement issuedto Petitioner

16-01-02 Xerox copy of the letter from Divisional Personnel Officer , Trichy to Petitioner

For the II Party/Management :-

Date Description

04-10-91 Xerox copy of the penalty advise issued to Petitioner 23-08-00 Xerox copy of the confidential report of the Petitioner

09-01-01 Xerox copy of the order of appointing authority .

15-09-00 Xerox copy of the letter of Sr.DME/DSL /GOC regarding age/ service review .

Nil Xerox copy of the Indian Railways Establishment Code Vol. II

Nil Xerox copy of the Railway Services D & A Rules , 1968 relevent pages

Nil Xerox copy of the service register of Petitioner .

Presiding Officer 7069 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 1st October , 2004 नई दिल्ली, 1 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2693.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टैन्डर्ड चार्टर्ड बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई ०डी० 77/642/643/644/ 647-2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

S.O. 2693.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. I.D. 77, 642,643 , 644 & 647/2001 ) of the Central Governrnent Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Standard Chartered Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 30-09-2004.

[सं० एल-12012/156/1998- आई. आर. ( बी. 1 ) ]

[No. L- 12012/ 156/98 - IR (B.I ) ] [सं० एल-12012/160/1998- आई.आर. ( बी. 1 ) ]

[No. L- 12012/ 160/98 - IR (B.I) ] [सं ० एल-12012/165/ 1998 -आई.आर. ( बी. 1) ]

[No. L- 12012/ 165/ 98 - IR ( B.I) ] [सं ० एल -12012/164/1998- आई.आर. ( बी . 1 ) ]

[No. L- 12012/164 /98 - IR ( B.I ) ]

[No. L- 12012/ 163/98 - IR (B.I ) ] [सं ० एल-12012/163/1998- आई.आर. ( बी. 1 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Friday, the 20th February , 2004

PRESENT SHRI K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Sl . No. I.D. No.

1 Party/ Petitioner

Reference No. & Date

IInd Party/Management TNID/ CGIDNo.

1 2

1. 77/2001 TNID No. 18/99 L- 12012/ 156/98 /IR (B - 1) dated 08-01-99

Shri D. Peter , C/ o Standard Chartered Bank Employees Union

The Senior Manager, (Emp . Relations & West) , Standard Chartered Bank , Chennai .

2. 642/2001 CGID No. 32/99 L- 12012/ 160/98/ IR (B- 1) dated 29-01-99

The Senior Manager , (Emp . Relations & West ) , Standard Chartered Bank , Chennai.

Shri D. Kotewara Roa , C/o General Secretary, All India, Standard Charterted Bank , Employees Federation .

CGIDNo. 33/99

3. 643/2001

L- 12012/ 165/98 /IR (B - 1) dated 29-01-99

Shri S. Kripakaran , C/o Standard Chartered Bank Employees Union

The Senior Manager , (Emp. Relations & West ) , Standard Chartered Bank , Chennai .

4. 644/2001 CGID No. 34/99 L- 12012/164/98 /IR (B- 1) dated 29-01-99

Shri I. Magimai Doss , C/ o Standard Chartered Bank Employees Union

The Senior Manager , (Emp. Relations & West) , Standard Chartered Bank , Chennai .

7070

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1 2

5. 647/2001 CGID No.122/99 L- 12012/ 163/98/IR (B-1 ) dated 22-01-99

Shri G. Thirunavukkarasu C/o Standard Bank Employees Union

The Senior Manager , (Emp. Relations & West) , Standard Chartered Bank , Chennai .

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Standard Chartered Bank and their workmen ) .

APPEARANCE :

For the Claimant

: Mr. G. Balasubramanian Advocate

Forthe Management : M/ s . T. S. Gopalan & Co. Advocates

AWARD

F 1.D. No. 77/2001 :-

not many takers . Finding that the voluntary retirement schemes did not yield the desired results , the bank began to terrorise the workmen coupled with a plan to do away with services of the leading functionaries of the union . While so , the charge memo was served on the Petitioner on 26th March , 1996 alleging assault , riotous or disorderly or indecent behaviour on the premises of the bank and doing act prejudicial to the interest of the bank and the Petition was suspended along with four other employees . While so , departmental enquiry was going on , the suspension was revoked on 1-10-96 and the Petitioner continued to work until dismissal on 21-7-97 . An appeal was made by the Petitioner and it was dismisssed . Then the Petitioner raised an industrial dispute before the conciliation officer and on its failure , the matter was referred to Govt . , which in turn referred this matter to this Tribunal of adjudication .

4. The facts of the case briefly as follows :

TheCentral Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L - 12012 / 156/98 / IR( B - 1 ) dated 08-01- 1999 has earlier referred this industrial dispute to Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal for adjudication. The Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal has taken the same on its file as 1.D. No. 18/99 and after the constitution of this Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court . the said industrial dispute was transferred to this Tribunal and after the receipt of records of this dispute , it was renumbered as I.D. No. 77/2001 .

2. The schedule mentioned dispute in the order of reference is hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of Standard Chartered Bank , Chennai in dismissing Shri D. Peter, Sub - staff from service with effect from 21-7-96 is justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled ? "

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows : --

The Petitioner was employed in the 11 Party/ Management in the year 1992 as a sub - staff. The II Party/Management has only one union namely Standard Chartered Bank Employee's Union and Federation . The bank introduced three voluntary retirement schemes in the year 1994, 1995 and 1996 , but there were

In the charge sheet issued to the Petitioner it was alleged that on 26-3-96 at about 3.00 pm two person's entered into the bank's main branch at Madras , where one Mr. S. Saha was working . The two persons did not approach any officers or superiors to the said Mr. Saha and they took the law into their own hands and demanded of the said Mr. Saha of some overdue balance on his credit card to be paid instantaneously . The other employees in the floor gathered there and in the mean time the union leader was also called there . Since the persons did not wear badge as per the bank's rules and till they left they did not exhibit their identity but when asked to leave they left in their motorcycle. In the charge - sheet it was alleged that the Petitioner and four others assaulted the officer , who had wreathing stomach pain, a bleeding nose etc. which were found to be false as could be seen from the medical report furnished by the Respondent/Bank in the course of departmental enquiry . During the enquiry and the subsequent appeal several pertinent points were raised by the Petitioners but the bank had nothing to say except there was nothing wrong in reply . Both the Disciplinary authority and Appellate Authority took erroneous view that no evidence was let in to prove the 7071 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

innocence of the Petitioners and they conveniently forgot that it was the duty of respondent/ Management to prove its charge . Only with the intention of doing away with the award staff and their union , the management had resorted to this drama and dispensed with the Petitioner along with four others . It is nothing but victimisation for trade union activities and it was intended more to terrorise the entire award staff with a view to dispense with them enblock . The Petitioners have not committed any mischief much less any assault or other acts of criminal nature . Hence he prays that an award may be passed directing the Respondent to reinstate the petitioners in these industrial disputes in the services of the bank with back wages and other attendant benefits .

employees in the domestic enquiry . In the domestic enquiry the Enquiry Officer has strictly followed the principles of natural justice . The Enquiry Officer , after carefully considering the evidences on record , gave his findings on 8-4-97 that the charges were proved against the Petitioner and four other employees . Then the Disciplinary Authority issued show cause notice as to why they should not be dismissed from service . After perusing the submissions made by the Petitioner and four others , the Disciplinary Authority dismissed the Petitioner and four others from the services of the Respondent/Bank . In the domestic enquiry, it is clearly established that Mr. Brayan D'Souza is an employee of the bank . Even assuming without admitting that Mr. Brayan D'Souza is an outsider , the Petitioner and other four persons cannot take the law in their own hands . Mr. Brayan D'Souza obtained permission from the Collection Manager M.S. Rooba and also informed Mr. Srinivasan , Assistant Manager ( Communication ) on thatday. In the medical report it is clearly established that Mr. Brayan D'Souza had bleeding through nose for a short period and also he had difficulty in hearing through left ear and it clearly shows that Mr. Brayan D'Souza was assaulted by the Petitioner and four other employees . The Respondent/Management proved the charges by letting oral and documentary evidence before the Enquiry Officer and Enquiry Officer also after going through the evidences placed before him , gave his findings stating that the charges were proved against the Petitioner and other four employees . It is false to allege that they were victimised for their trade union activities . Hence , the punishment of dismissal is not excessive and disproportionate to the charges as alleged by the Petitioners and the same is justified one and could not be interfered with . Hence , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.

I.D. No. 642/2001 : -

6. The Central Govemment , Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L - 12012/ 160/98 / IR(B - I ) dated 29-01-1999 has earlier referred this industrial dispuse to Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court , Chennai for adjudication and the dispute was taken on its file as CGID No. 32/99 and after the consititution of this Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , the said industrial dispute was transferred to this Tribunal and after the receipt of records ofthis dispute, it was renumbered as I.D. No. 642/2001 .

7. The Schedule mention dispute in the order or reference is hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of Standard Chartered Bank, Chennai in terminating the services ofShri D. Koteswara Rao , with effect from 21-7-96 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the said workman is entitled ?"

5. As against this , the respondent in counter Statement alleged that the Petitioners were chargesheeted for certain alleged misconducts on 26-3-96 . One Mr. Brayan D'Souza, an official of the credit card centre alongwithMr. Sylvester Jerry , a collection agent met Mr. Srinivasa Saha an employee in Telex Department at about 3.15 pm . At that tine , Sri Srinivasa Saha made a telephone call to Mr. Dawood, General Secretary of the Standard Chartered Bank Employee's Union and upon arrival of Mr. Dawood, 20 employees including the Petitioners gathered around Mr. Brayan D'Souza and Mr. Sylvester Jerry and did not allow them to the speak . The Petitioner and other persons commenced pushing and jostling Mr. Brayan D'Souza and Mr. Sylvester Jerry and progressively increased the violence on them by pushing and jostling which were done all the while in a threatening manner and they also pushed them to banking hall , situated adjacent to Telex Department and beat both of them . In spite of repeated requests , they continued to push and beat them . Mr. Brayan D'Souza was hit on his body and was also kicked by back and shoulder by the Petitioners and four persons and as a result , Mr. Brayan D'Souza fell down and he somehow managed to get up with the help of Mr. Sylvester Jerry and ran to 2nd tloor for help . Even there , the Petitioner and four others grabbed him from all sides by his clothes and commenced hitting him all over the face , head and body. Mr. Brayan D'Souza was hurt severely and he tried to plead to the five employees not to beat him hut they continued the beat on his face , head and body till he fell down screaming . As a result . Mr. Brayan D'Souza was not only shocked but also had bleeding from his nose and was hurt painfully in the earleading to his hospitalisation from 26-3-96 to 30-3-96 . Hence, the Respondent framed charge sheet and issued to the Petitioner and four other employees stating that the above mentioned acts on the part of five employees would constitute gross misconduct and called for an explanation . Since the explanation submittedby the Petitioners was not satisfactory , the Respondent/Management ordered for domestic enquiry . The Respondent/ Management examined tive witnesses including Mr. Brayan D'Souza and the defence representative of the Petitioners examined two 7072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/ KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[ PART 11 - SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 8. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:-

"Whether the action of the Management of Standard Chartered Bank, Chennai in terminating the services of Shri 1. Magimai Doss , with effect from 21-7-96 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the said workman is entitled to ? "

The Petitioner was employed in the II Party/ Management in the year 1982 as a Sub - staff. The other allegations averred by the Petitioner in the Claim Statement and facts of the case are similar as that of the allegations and facts made in I.D. No. 77/2001 .

16. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

9.As against this , the Respondent in their Counter Statement has raised similar contentions as that of I.D. No. 77/2001 .

I.D. No. 643/2001 : ---

The Petitioner was employed in the II Party/ Management the year 1980 as a sub - staff. The other allegations averred by the Petitioner in the Claim Statement and facts of the case are similar as that of the allegations and facts made in 1.D. 77/2001 ,

17. As against this , the Respondent in their Counter Statement has raised similar contentions as that of I. D. No. 77/2001 .

I.D. No. 647/2001 :-

10. The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L- 12012/ 165 / 98 / IR ( B - 1 ) dated 29-01-1999 has earlier referred this industrial dispute to Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court , Chennai for adjudication and the dispute was taken on its file as CGID No. 33/99 and after the constitution of this Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , the said industrial dispute was transferred to this Tribunal and after the receipt of records of this dispute , it was renumbered as I.D. No. 643/2001 .

11. The Schedule mention dispate in the order of reference is hereunder.--

18. The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L- 12012/ 163 /98 / IR(B- 1 ) dated 22-01-1999 has earlier referred this industrial dispute to Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court , Chennai for adjudication and the dispute was taken on its file as CGID No. 122/99 and after the constitution ofthis Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , the said industrial dispute was transferred to this Tribunal and after the receipt of records of this dispute , it was renumbered as I.D. No. 647/2001 .

"Whether the action of the Management of Standard Chartered Bank , Chennai in terminating the services of Shri S. Kripakaran with effect from 21-796 is legal andjustified ? If not to what relief the said workman is entitled to ? "

19. The schedule mentioned dispute in the order of reference is hereunder :-

12. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :--

"Whether the action of the management of Statndard Chartered Bank , Chennai in terminating the services ofSri G. Thirunavukkarasu , Clerk from service with effect from 21-7-96 is justified or not ? If not justified, to what relief the said workman is entitled ? " The Petitioner was employed in the 11 Party / Management in the year 1981 as a Clerk . The other allegations averred by the Petitioner in the Claim Statement and facts of the case are similar as that of the allegations and facts made in 1. D. No. 77/2001

20. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:----

13. As against this the respondent in their Counter Statement has raised similar contentions as that of 1. D. No. 77/2001 .

I.D. No. 644/2001 :-

The Petitioner was employed in the 11 Party / Management in the year 1981 as a Clerk . The other allegations averred by the Petitioner in the Claim Statement and facts of the case are similar as that of the allegations and facts made in I.D. No. 77/2001 .

21. As against this , the Respondent in their Counter Statement has raised similar contentions as that of 1.D. No. 77/2001 .

22. In such circumstances , the points for my determination are :---

14. The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L - 12012/ 164/ 98 / IR ( B - I ) dated 29-01-1999 has earlier referred this industrial dispute to Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court Chennai for adjudication and the dispute was taken on its file as CGID No. 34/99 and after the constitution of this Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , the said industrial dispute was transferred to this Tribunal and after the receipt of records of this dispute , it was renumbered as 1.D. No. 644/2001 .

(1) "Whether the action of the Respondent/ Management in dismissing these Petitioners from service w.e.f. 21-7-96 is justified ? "

(ii) " To what relief the Petitioners are entitled ? " 15. The Schedule mention dispute in the order of reference is hereunder .-- [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Point No. 1 :

23. Since the issue involved in all these five industrial disputes is common, both sides have filed a joint memo stating that all the five cases may be tried together and a common award may be passed . The memo is recorded and as such a common Award is passed in these five industrial disputes.

24. The charge against the Petitioners in these cases is that on 26-03-1996 one Mr. Brayan D'Souza, an official of the Credit Card Centre of Respondent/ Bank along with one Mr. Sylvester Jerry, a collection agent came and met Mr. Srinivasa Sah , an employee in Telex Department of the Respondent/Bank at about 3.15 pin and the said Mr. Brayan D'Souza sought to remind Mr. Srinivasa Sah about his over due outstanding on the credit card issued to him by the bank. In that Mr. Srinivasa Sah was evasive and offending in his remarks . Again Mr. Brayan D'Souza pointed out that he was there in his official capacity, immediately Mr. Srinivasa Sah made a telephone call to Mr. Dawood, General Secretary of the Employees Union and upon the arrival of the General Secretary about 20 employees including the Petitioner gathered strictly around Mr. Brayan D'Souza and Mr. Sylvester Jerry and began to attack them and did not allow them to speak. The Petitioners were pushing and jostling Mr. Brayan D'Souza and Mr. Sylvester Jerry and progressively increased the violence of pushing and jostling and pushed both of them to the banking hall situated adjacentto Telex Department and beat both of them and even in spite of their requests , the Petitioners and others beat them , Mr. Brayan D'Souza was hit on his body and was also kicked by five employees on his back and shoulder and they were running upto second floor . The Petitioners went along with them and further assaulted them and as a result of this assault on the face , head and body of Mr. Brayan D'Souza , he has got bleeding injuries in the nose and was hurt painfully in the ear. As a result of this Mr. Brayan D'Souza was hospitalised from 26th March to 30th March , 1996 and therefore, the domestic enquiry was held and in which the Petitioners were found guilty of the charges framed against them and the punishment of dismissal was imposed on them.

25. As against this , the Petitioner contended on several grounds . They alleged that the suspension order was issuedto them and the allegations in the suspension order and in charge sheet are different versions and they are not corroborated with each other and therefore , they have totally vitiated the enquiry proceedings . Secondly, Mr. Brayan D'Souza and Mr. Sylvester Jerry have no locus standi to enter into the Telex Department without permission, which is a most prohibited area. Thirdly, the following situation will prove that the alleged complaint was concocted by the Respondent/management and the officials namely Mr. Ramesh and not a true one- 3050GI/ 04-26

7073

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक1 , 1926.

(1) The alleged complaint was not given to the officer ofthe premises nor before the nearest police station by Mr. Brayan D'Souza, but it was given to Mr. Unni Narayanan at R. R. Towers of the Respondent/Bank situated far away from the place of alleged occurrence. Further , it is also admitted by Mr. Brayan D'Souza as MW1 that as per the suggestion of Mr. Unni Narayanan , it was given to him. But on the other hand , Mr. Unni Narayanan , who is a material witness in this case was not examined before the enquiry;

(ii) The complaint alleged to have been given by Mr. Brayan D'Souza has not mentioned the name of the second victim;

(iii) The complaint was silent with regard to the alleged injuries on the nose of the first victim;

(iv) The time of occurrence was not mentioned in the complaint. Further , it is not proved how thevictim has identified the alleged assaulters subsequently, even the eye witness , who was examined on the side of the management , who alleged to have been present at the time of occurrence namely Mr. Srinivasa Sah has... not stated about the alleged assault made by the Petitioners against the victim . Even though, Mr. Sylvester Jerrry has witnessed the occurrence and even though he was alleged to have been assaulted by the Petitioners , no reason was stated by the management for non- examining the said eye witness .

For all these reasons , it can be inferred that the complaint made against the Petitioners is a concocted one and the management wanted to victimise the trade union activities and intended to terrorise the entire award staff with a view to dispense with them enbloc .

26. As against this, the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that all the employees of the respondent branch at Armenian Street even though have assaulted Mr. Brayan D'Souza and Mr. Sylvester Jerry, the said persons have gone to the chamber of Mr. Sitaraman Bhatin the second floor and even then the Petitioners and other employees have assaulted them and hurt them severely and only when the Branch Manager namely Mr. Ramesh came to the place, they were rescued from the Petitioners and others and therefore , out of fear Mr. Brayan D'Souza has not given any written complaint immediately and he has rushed to the Apollo Hospital immediately and wasadmitted in the Apollo Hospital till 30th March, 1996. Under such circumstances , it cannot be contended that the complaint must be given to the officer of the premises or to the nearest police station . Similarly, even though the victim has given a complaint out of fear and shock, which 7074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] he has met in the hands of the Petitioners and others , he has not narrated the full incident in detail . In this case , from the evidence of other management witnesses , it is clearly established that the incident has taken place as alleged by the Respondent/Management and it was proved beyond doubt that the Petitioners were involved in that incident and have committed the offences as alleged against them . Eventhough , it is alleged that the victim namelyMr. Brayan D'Souza has not mentioned the injury on the nose , from the records of the Apollo Hospital produced before the enquiry, it has been established that he had bleeding injury in his nose and also in the ear . Though , it is contended that the time of occurrence and also the name of other victims and other particulars were not mentioned in the complaint only due to the shock, the victim Mr. Brayan D'Souza has not mentioned all the particulars in detail , but he has mentioned that he and another person were involved in the incident and he has mentioned only in plural and not in singular . Further, even though it is alleged that the complaint given by Mr. Brayan D'Souza, he has not mentioned the names of the assaulters , the Branch Manager namely Mr. Ramesh has clearly stated in the enquiry that he has brought the victims to the first floor and he has noted the persons who were identified by the victims and therefore , it cannot be contended that the assaulters have not been identified by the victims . Further, though it is contended that the Witness No. 3 Mr. Srinivasa Sah has not stated the incident of assault the incident has taken place in the banking hall and they have dragged the victims to banking hall and in such circumstances , it cannot be said that Mr. Srinivasa Sah must have seen the occurrence . Further, the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that disciplinary proceedings is not a criminal trial and the standard of proof required in such proceedings is that of preponderence of probability and not proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt and in this case . The management has clearly established from the examination of five witnesses before the Enquiry Officer and has proved the charges framed against the Petitioners that they have bodily assaulted the said Mr. Brayan D'Souza who is an officer of the Respondent/Bank , Credit Card Centre and thus , made a grave misconduct and therefore , it cannot be said that the domestic enquiry held against them is not fair and proper . Further, it is the contention ofthe counsel for the Respondent that the Petitioners have not disputed the presence of Mr. Brayan D'Souza and another man in the premises of the bank, but on the other hand , they have contended that without permission and against the rules , they have entered into the bank premises and that too in the prohibited area . Even for an argument sake without conceding that Mr. Brayan D'Souza and Mr. Sylvester Jerry have entered into the bank , the Petitioner and others cannot take law into their own hands and assault the said persons .

Respondent/Management in this case is not proper and they have not followed the principles of natural justice and in such case , it cannot be held that domestic enquiry conducted in this case is fair and proper one . He further argued that even during the enquiry proceedings the bank was represented by more than one Presenting Officer namely Sri S. T. Krishna, Assistant Manager , Internal Control was first appointed as Presenting Officer but he was soon replaced by Sri C. Krishnamurthy , a top professional in the field and no reason was however , given for the change ofPresenting Officer. Even when it was taken up in the proceedings the Enquiry Officer has stated that it is not necessary to give reason in this regard and he relied on the rulings reported in 1983 LAB IC 419 the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BOMBAY Vs. DILIP KUMAR, wherein the Supreme Court has held that " where in an enquiry before domestic Tribunal , the delinquent officer is pitted against a legally trained mind , if he seeks permission to appear through a legal practitioner, the refusal to grant this request would amount to denial of reasonable request to defend himself and essential principles of natural justice wouldbe violated. " Relying on this judgement, the counsel argued that even the request of the Petitioner to engage a legal practitioner has been refused by the Enquiry Officer and in such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Enquiry Officer has followed the principles of natural justice in this case . He further argued that non - examination of material.witness in this case are fatal to the case of the management and in this case, the alleged second victim namely Mr. Sylvester Jerry's name was not mentioned in the complaint. He was also not examined before the Enquiry. Officer. Further , the management has not given any application for his non- examination . But his alleged letter was marked without any proof through one Mr. Priyadharshan Manager , MW4 and in such circumstances , it cannot be said that the incident has happened as alleged by the management. Further , though the charge sheet has been issued against the Petitioners it is not mentioned how may persons involved in the incident and there is also no mention about how the incident has happened . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that charges framed against the Petitioners have been proved by the manage- ment . It is also the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioners that there is interpolating in the charge with regard to 19.5 ( c ) of the Bipartite Settlement and in such circumstances , it cannot be held that the charges framed against the Petitioners have been proved. It is also the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that even assuming for an argument sake without conceding that the charges have been proved against the Petitioners , this Tribunal has got ample powers under Section 11 A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to modify the punishment becuase the punishment in this case is not proportionate to the misconduct alleged against them and the dismissal from service is shockingly disproportionate to the charges alleged against them and therefore , the Tribunal may modify 27. But, on the other hand , the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that the enquiry held by the [ भाग !! - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7975

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

the punishment given to them and he relied on rulings reported in-

(1) 1999 1 LW 28 ( SN ) Ganesha Murthy Vs. Presiding Officer, I addtional Labour Court, Madras and Others;

(ii) 1999 3 LW 62 ( SN) Chinnaiyan and Another Vs. Presiding Officer , I Additional Labour Court, Chennai and Another;

(iii) 2002 4 Supreme Court Today 592 - Hindustan Motors Ltd. Vs. Tapan Kumar Bhattacharya and Another ; and

(iv) 2003 III LLJ - Steel Authority of India Ltd. , Coimbatore Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore and Another .

(v) 2003 III LLJ 823 - Dev Singh Vs. Punjab Tourism DevelopmentCorporation Ltd. and Another .

and the learned counsel for the Respondent relied on the rulings 1970 I LLJ 26 , wherein the workmen contended that in enquiry proceedings , the Mill Manager did not conduct the enquiry proceedings as laid down under the Standing Orderand the recording of the findings by the Mill Manager wasviolative and the Senior Laabour Officer actedbothas LabourOfficer and Judge and the Supreme Court negativing the contention of the Union and accepting the contention of the management held that the Senior Labour Officer merely confined himself the evidence and the Mil ! Manager after giving full and fair opportunity had found the workmen quilty of charge and consequently passed the order of dismissal . Similarly, in this case , thought the person appointed for presenting the case was a legal officer ofthe bank, he has only presented the case and only the Enquiry Officer after giving fair and full opportunity to the Petitioners had found the petitioner are guilty of the charges framed and therefore , there was no violation of principles ofnaturaljustice.

29. I find much force in this contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent . Even though , the Petitioners contended that change of Presenting Officer and that too a legal person is against the principles of natural justice, the Enquiry Officer has clearly statedwhile rejecting the contention of the Petitioners that Sri S.T. Krishna, the first Presenting Officer has to be relieved on certain exigencies of internal control work and taking into account his personal request , the change has been effected . Under such circumstances , I find it cannot be contended that principles of natural justice has been overruled. Even though the counsel for the Petitioner argued that the punishment is not proportionate to the misconduct alleged against the Petitioners and the misconduct is not so serious and they are entitled to the punishment to sentence of economic death by dismissing them from service and they alleged that there is no condiseration about the past record of service while considering the question of punishment, I find, the charge against the Petitioners are assault against an officer of theRespondent/Bank . The Petitioners were employed in the Respondent/Bank, where the confidence of customer is paramount for the success of banking business . Further, the Petitioners assaulted the officer of the Respondent/ Bank that too inside the premises of the bank , where large number of employees are working and if this Tribunal inclinedto interfere with the punishment imposedby the Disciplinary Authority in the domestic enquiry , I think , the employee should get a wrong signal and it would make an impression that they can assault either an employee or officer and would go scot - free and it would only create industrial unrest and render enforcement of discipline by the bank impossible . I further find, this is not a case which warrants this Tribunal to set aside the order of dismissal and to order reinstatement . I further find this Tribunal cannot interfere in the quantum of 28. Now, we will see the contentions of the Petitioners one by one . It is alleged on behalf of the Petitioners that Mr. Brayan D'Souza is an outsider and he has no locus standi to be present at Armenian Street Branch Office of the Respondent/Bank on 26-3-96 and that too in the Telex Department, but I find there is no substance inthe contention of the Petitioner because , even assuming for an argument sake without conceding that Mr. Brayan D'Souza in an outsider , which fact is disproved by the Respondent/Management's witnesses , the Petitioners cannot take law in their own hands and assault the outsider. Similarly , the Petitioners contended that they entered into the office without signing into visitor's book and they entered into the prohibited area and they did not display their identity card before the concerned officers and so on . But from the evidence of the management witnesses , it is clear that they have enquired the officer in -charge and also thesuperior officer of Mr. Sah namely one Mr. Srinivasan with regard to Mr. Sah they have also expressed their identification before them . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that Mr. Brayan D'Souza is an outsider and he has no locus standi to be present in the Armenian Street branch of the Respondent/ Bank . Even though the Petitioners contended that the bank has changed the Presenting Officer and they appointed a legal person to present the case and when their request was denied , it is a failure on the part of the Enquiry Officer and it is against the principles of natural justice , the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that merely changing the Presenting Officer does not vitiate the enquiry conducted by the Respondent against the Petitioners and further the new Presenting Officer is not a lawyer , but on the other hand, he is only a bank employee and he further argued that there was no Standing Order prohibiting the Resondent/ Bank asking the legal person to present the case before the Enquiry Officer and further , it cannot be said that the legal officer of the Respondent /Bank has acted as a prosecutor

3050 G1/04-27A 7076

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii))

W9 30-03-96 Xerox copy ofthe health report given byApolloHospital

W10 03-04-96

punishment which was proved that the misconduct committed is grave in nature and which warrant the punishment of dismissal from service . I also find that though this Tribunal has got powers to modify the punishment imposed , this is not a case in which this Tribunal can interfere and therefore , I find this point against the Petitioners .

Point No. 2 :-

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioners are entitled ?

30. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the Petitioners in these industrial disputes are not entitled to any relief as claimed by them . No Costs .

31. Thus , all the above references are answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 20th February , 2004.)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined : -

: None

On either side

Common Documents Marked :-

Xerox copy ofthe charge sheet issued to Peter

W11 03-04-96 Xerox copy of the charge sheet issued to D. K. Rao

03-04-96

W12

Xerox copy of the charge sheet issued to Thirunavukkarasu

03-04-96

W 13

Xerox copy ofthe charge sheet issued toMagimai Doss

03-04-96

W14

Xerox copy ofthe charge sheet issued toKirupakaran

W 15 04-04-96 Xerox copy of the memo issued by Martin Fish to staff,

W16 13-09-96 Xerox copy of the letter issued by Respondent to Thirunavukkarasu W 17 03-10-96 Xerox copy of the withdrawal order of suspension To Mr. Peter W18 03.10 Xerox copy of the withdrawal order of suspension To Mr. Kripakaran W1900

For the I Party/Workman :-

Date

Ex. No.

Description

WI 26-03-96 Xerox copy of the suspension order issued to Mr. Peter .

26-03-96

Xerox copy of the suspension order issued to Mr. Kotteswara Rao W3 26-03-96 Xerox copy of the suspension order issued to Mr. Thirunavukkarasu .

W4 26-03-96 Xerox copy of the suspension order issued to Kirupakaran

W5 26-03-96 Xerox copy of the suspension order issued to 1. M. Doss

W6 Nil.

Xerox copy of the report given by Mr. Brayan D'Souza

26-03-96

Xerox copy of the report given by Mr. Sylvester Jerry

W8 30-03-96 Xerox copy of the discharge summary issued to Mr. Brayan D'Souza Xerox copy of the withdrawal order of suspension in respect of Sri G. Thirunavukkarasu

03-10-96

Xerox copy of the withdrawal order of suspension in respect of Koteeswara Rao

W21 07-10-96 Xerox copy of the memorandum of settlement arrived at Before Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) W22 19-07-97 Xerox copy of the final order of dismissal issued to Sri D. Peter 19-07-97

W 23

Xerox copy of the final order of dismissal issued to Kirubakaran W24 19-07-97 Xerox copy of the final order of dismissal issued to Sri Magimai Doss 19-07-97

W25

Xerox copy of the final order of dismissal issued to Thirunavukkarasu

20-10-97

W26

Xerox copy of the order of Appellate Authority issued in respect of Mr. D. Peter

3050 G1 /04-27B 207 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

W27 20-10-97

M 14 Nil

Xerox copy ofthe list of witnesses Xerox copy ofthe order of Appellate Authority issued in respect of Mr.G. Thirunavukkarasu

M15 (2) 06-09-96 Xerox copy of the letter from S. Jerry to Respondent

W28 20-10-97

M 16 (3) 1/96 to 3/96

Xerox copy ofthe order of Appellate Authority issued in respect of Mr. D. Kotteswara Rao

Xerox copy of the statement of salar ofMr. S. Sah

W29 20-10-97

M 17 22-07-96 Xerox copy of the statement of account of Sri Sah

Xerox copy ofthe order of Appellate Authority issued in respect of Mr. Magimai Doss

26-03-96

M18 (2)

W30 20-10-97

Xerox copy of the extract from cash statements

Xerox copy of the order of Appellate Authority issued In respect of Mr. S. Kripakaran. late

26-03-96

M19

Xerox copy of the ROC vouchers of Respondent

For the II Party/Management :-

M20 21-02-97

Ex . No. Date

Description

Xerox copy of the notice issued by Union

M1 24-04-96

M21 28-12-96

Series (5)

Xerox copy of the explanation given by Petitioners to Charge sheet

Xerox copy of the 46th Annual General Body Meeting Report of the Union .

M2 17-06-96 Xerox copy of the order appointing Presenting Officer

29-06-96

M22

Xerox copy ofthe letter of AISCBEF along with copy of resolutions.

M3 03-07-96

04-04-96

M23

Хегrox copy of the letter from Presenting Officer To Disciplinary authority enclosing list of witnesses

16-08-96

Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent/Bank to General Secretary of the Employees ' Union of Respondent/Bank

Xerox copy ofthe appointment letter ofPresenting Officer .

29-08-96

M24

M5 Nil

Xerox copy of the letter from Union to Respondent/Bank

Xerox copy of the credit card application form of Sri Srinivasa Sah

26-03-96

Nil

M25

Xerox copy of the enquiry proceedings

Xerox copy ofthe credit card services directory

20-06-97

05-12-95

M 26 (5)

Xerox copy of the credit card statement of Sri Sah

Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent to Petitioners 05-03-96

07-07-97

M27 (5)

Xerox copy of the credit card statement of Sri Sah

Xerox copy of the reply to the 2nd show cause notice

M9 Nil

Xerox copy ofthe report ofMr. Bryan

M28 07-07-97 Xerox copy of the proceedings of personal hearing

30-03-96

M 10

Xerox copy ofthe discharge summary issued by Appollo Hospital

19-07-97

M29 (5)

Xerox copy of the final order issued by Respondent to Petitioner 26-03-96

M11

Xerox copy of the letter from Sri S. Ramesh to the Respondent

M30 (5) 21-08-97

26-03-96

M 12

Xerox copy of the appeal preferred by Petitioners before Appellate Authority

Xerox copy of the letter from Srinivasan to Respondent

M31 (5) 20-10-97

M 13 (5) Nil

Xerox copy of the orders of Appellate Authority issued to Petitioners Xerox copy of the attendance record to Petitioners 7078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2694.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इन्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय, नासिक के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 93/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल-12012/ 147/96- आई.आर. ( बी . 11 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 4th October , 2004

S.O. 2694.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 93/97) of the Labour Court , Nashik as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 30-09-2004.

[No. L - 12012/ 147 /96- IR( B.11 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE LABOUR COURT AT NASHIK (BEFORE SMT. C. A. NATHANI , JUDGE , LABOUR COURT, NASHIK)

Reference ( IDA) No. 93/97

Between

Management Central Bank of India Nashik.

... First Party

And

Shri Atmaram B. Jadhav , Near Siddarth Nagar , Sector No. 12 , CIDCO , New Aurangabad , Dist . Aurangabad

...... Second Party

AWARD

Thisis reference made by the Govt. of India , New Delhi , for adjudication to this Court , on the demand ofthe second party for reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages . After receipt ofthis reference , notice were sent to both the parties . The second party remained absent since last many days he has not lead any evidence . Hence this reference is rejected.

Nashik

Dated : 7-8-2004

SMT. C. A. NATHANI , Presiding Officer

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2695.-औद्योमिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडीकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9, 10, और 11/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल -12011 /186/2002- आई.आर. ( बी. II ) ] [सं० एल-12011/187/2002- आई.आर. (बी . II ) ] [सं० एल -12011 /188/2002- आई. आर. ( बी. II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 4th October , 2004

یا S.O. 2695.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.9 , 10 and 11/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen , was received by the Contral GovFLDIent on 30-09-2004.

[No. L- 12011/ 186/2002 - IR ( B.II ) ]

[No. L- 12011/ 187/2002 - IR ( B.II ) ]

[No. L- 12011 / 188 /2002 - IR ( B.II ) ]

C. GANGADHARAN , Under Sccy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Friday, the 28th November , 2003

Present :

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE Nos . 9, 10, 11/2003

(Inthe matter of dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofSub-section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between theManagement of Syndicate Bank and their workmen;.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7079

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

BETWEEN

The General Secretary, Syndicate Bank Employees Union.

.II Party/Claimant

And

The Deputy General Manager, Syndicate Bank, Chennai . ...... II Party/Management

Appearance:

For the Claimant

: Sri S. Vaidyanathan, Advocate

For the Management : M/s. T.S. Gopalan & Co. Advocate

AWARD

I.D. NO . 9/2003

1. The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L- 12011 / 186/2002 - IR(B - 11 ) dated 29-11-2002 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

"Whether the imposition of the punishment of reduction in basic pay by one stage for one year to Smt . Vanmathi Jayaseelan , Clerk by the management of Syndicate Bank vide proceedings dated 22-7-2000 is legal and justified? If not , what relief is the workman entitled to?

2. After the reciept of the reference , this case was taken on file as I.D. No. 9/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered through their advocates and filed their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement .

3. The allegations ofthe Petitioner Union in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

ordered an enquiry rejecting her explanation . During the enquiry , the managementmana produced three witnesses in support oftheir case and on the workman side 21 witnesses were examined . But without taking into account the deposition given in the defence witnesses , the Enquiry Officer with pre-determination decided to support the management witnesses and has given a report stating that the charge levelled against the workman was proved . The Disciplinary Authority also without considering the submissions made by the concerned employee proposed to impose the punishment of reduction in basic pay by two stages for two years and after the personal hearing , the Disciplinary Authority has awarded the punishment of reduction in basic pay by one stage for one year . Even , the appeal preferred by the concerned employee before Appellate Authority has been negatived. It is submitted that the entire enquiry proceedings are wrongful . The conclusion has been drawn on the basis of pre - determined, bias against the trade union and not based on any direct or circumstantial evidence led against the concerned employee. The observation made by the Enquiry Officer clearly established that he has enquired the case with a pre-determined mind . The Enquiry Officer rejected the entire evidence led by the defence witnesses , since most ofthem belonging to the category of backward communities , scheduled caste/ scheduled tribe and on the ground that they are not qualitative evidences . On seeing the concerned workman in trade union activities , the Respondent/ Management has become very critical about it and on their attempt to intimidate her other activities , the chargesheet hasbeen concocted . There is no evidence to implicate the concerned employee to the alleged distribution of pamphlets and even assuming that the concerned employee has distributed the pamphlets , it cannot be said to be an act prejudicial to the interest of the bank . It was a peaceful demnostration exposing the illegal action of the bank in not complying with the settlement . Therefore , the concerned employee has not committed any misconduct and the punishment imposed by the bank for no fault of the concerned employee is illegal , arbitrary , malatide , victimisation and unfair labour practice . Hence , the Petitioner Union prays for an award in their favour .

4.As against this , the Respondent in their Counter Statement contended that the referred dispute being a collective dispute under section 2k of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, the Petitioner Union is bound to establish its competence and authority to take up the cause ofthe workmen and raise an industrial dispute . In this case, the trade union activities cannot be a shield for indulging in acts of misconduct . On 18-6-99, the Respondent/Bank hasorganised a function at 8.30 am for total computerisation of T. Nagar branch and it was to be inaugurated by the then Chairman & Managing Director of the bank Sri K. V. Krishnamoorthy in the presence of prominent persons . While so , without any prior notice , the concerned employee The Petitioner Union has raised this dispute espousing the cause of Smt . Vanmathi Jayaseelan who is working as Clerk in Purasaiwakkam Branch of the Respondent/Bank. The concerned workman was charge- sheeted on 25-6-99 alleging that she and her colleague led demonstration of part - time employees during the inaugural function of total computerisation of T. Nagar branch was going on and distributed leaf let/pamphlets to the persons who attended the said function on 18-6-99 and thereby tarnished the image of the bank in the eyes of the public and it is an act prejudical to the interest of the bank . Though the concerned workman has given her explanation to the Respondent/Management , the Repondent Bank has [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

7080

8. The allegations of the Petitioner Union in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

along with two others led a group of part - time sweepers and scavengers who were wearing headbands and they distributed pamphlets purported to be a representation against the non - regularisation of part-time employees . The concerned employee was not an employee of the T. Nagar branch . Therefore , a charge sheet was issued and even in the explanation the concerned employee has not disputed her presence nor she has disputed her participation in demonstration which she would describe as a " call of duty " assigned by the Petitioner Union . The Enquiry Officer, on considering he merits of the case , has held that the charges have been proved against the employee as they were clearly established . In this case , the punishment awarded to the concerned employee for misconduct committed by her is fullyjustified and valid in law and the same should not be interfered for any of the reasons urged in the Claim Statement filed before this Tribunal . The jurisdiction of this Tribunal in dealing with disputes other than those section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is to consider whether the finding are wholly unsupported by any evidence so as to call it perverse . It is not permissible for the Petitioner Union to invite this Tribunal to re- appreciate the favis and evidence and to arrive at a conclusion different from that of the Enquiry Officer. Hence, the Respondent prays that the claim of the Petitioner Union maybe rejected.

5. In such circumstances , the points for my consideration are

(0) "Whether the imposition of punishment of reduction in basic pay by one stage for one year to the concerned employee by the Respondent/Bank is legal and justified ?

(ii) To what relief the concerned employee is entitled to ? י

I. D. No. 10/2003 :-

6. The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L- 12011 / 187/2002- IR (B- 11 ) dated 30-12-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.:--

"Whether the imposition of the punishment of reduction in basic pay by one stage for one year to Smt. Usha Kiran , Clerk by the management of Syndicate Bank vide proceedings dated 22-7-2000 is legal and justified ? If so , what reliefthe workman is entitled to ?"י

The Petitioner Union has raised this dispute espousing the cause of Smt. Usha Kiran , who is working as Clerk in Purasawalkam Branch of the Respondent/Bank . The concerned workman was charge sheeted on 25-6-99 alleging that she and her colleague led demonstration of part - time employees during the inaugural function oftotal computerisation of T. Nagar branch was going on and distributed leaf let/pamphlets to the persons who attended the said function on 18-6-99 and thereby tarnished the image of the bank in the eyes of the public and it is anact prejudicial to the interest of the bank . Though the concerned workman has given her explanation to the Respondent/Management , the Respondent Bank has ordered and enquiry rejecting her explanation . During the enquiry, the management produced three witnesses in support of their case and on the workmen side 21 witnesses were examined. But without taking into account the deposition given by the defence witnesses , the Enquiry Officer with pre - determination decided to support the management witnesses and has given a report stating that the charge levelled against the workman was proved . The Disciplinary Authority also without considering the submissions made by the concerned employee proposed to impose the punishment of reduction in basic pay by two stages for two years and after the personal hearing, the Disciplinary Authority has awarded the punishment ofreduction in basic pay by one stage for one year . Even , the appeal preferred by the concerned employee before Appellate Authority has been negatived . It is submitted that the entire enquiry proceedings are wrongful . The conclusion has been drawn on the basis of pre -determined , bias against the trade union and not based on any direct.or circumstantial evidence led against the concerned employee . The observation made by the Enquiry Officer clearly established that he has enquiry the casewith a pre-determined mind . The Enquiry Officer rejected the entire evidence led by the defence witnesses , since most of them belonging to the category of backward communities, scheduled caste/ scheduled tribe and on the ground that they are not qualitative evidences . On seeing the concerned workman in trade union activities , the Respondent/ Management has become very critical about it and on their attempt to intimidate her other activities , the charge sheet has been concocted. There is no evidence to

implicate the concerned employee to the alleged distribution of pamphlets and even assuming that the concemed employee has distributed the pamphlets , it cannot be said to be an act prejudicial to the interest 7. After the receipt of the reference , this case was taken on file as 1. D. No. 10/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered through their advocates and filed their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement .

7081 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

(ii) To what relief the concerned employee is entitield to? "

I.D. No. 11/2003 :-

ofthe bank. It was a peaceful demonstration exposing the illegal action of the bank in not complying wit the settlement. Therefore, the concerned employee has not committed any misconduct and the punishment imposed by the bank for no fault of the concerned employee is illegal , arbitrary, malafide, victimisation and unfair labour practice . Hence, the Petitioner Union prays for an award in their favour.

11. The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L- 12011 / 188/2002 - IR (B - II ) dated 29-11-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

"Whether the imposition of the punishment o reduction in basic pay by one stage for one year to Smt . Sathyabama, Clerk by the management of Syndicate Bank vide proceedings dated 22-7-2000 is legal andjustified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"

12. After the receipt of the reference , this case was taken on file as I.D. No. 11/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered through their advocates and filed their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement .

13. The allegations of the Petitioner Union in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

9. As against this , the Respondent in their Counter Statement contended that the referred dispute being a collective dispute under section 2k of the industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Petitioner Union is bound to establish its competence and authority to take up the casue ofthe workmen and raise an industrial dispute. In this case, the trade union activities cannot be a shield for indulging in acts of misconduct . On 18-6-99 , the Respondent/Bank has organised a function at 8.30 a.m. for total computerisation of T. Nagar branch and it was to be inaugurated by the then Chairman & Managing Director of the bank Sri K.V. Krishnamoorthy in the presence of prominent persons . While so , without any prior notice , the concerned employee along with two others led a group of part-time sweepers and scavangers who were wearing headbands and they distributed pamphlets purported to be a representation against the non - regularisation of part- time employees . The concerned employee was not an employee of the T. Nagar branch . Therefore , a charge sheet was issued and even in the explanation the concerned employee has not disputed her presence nor she has disputed her participation in demonstration which she would describe as a " call of duty " assigned by the Petitioner Union . The Enquiry Officer , on considering the merits of the case , has held that the charges have been proved against the employee as they were clearly established . In this case , the punishment awarded to the concerned employee for misconduct committed by her is fully justified and valid in law and the same should not be interfered for any ofthe reasons urged in the Claim Statement filed before this Tribunal . The jurisdiction of this Tribunal in dealing with disputes other than those under section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 is to consider whether the finding are wholly unsupported by any evidence so as to call it perverse . It is not permissible for the Petitioner Union to invite this Tribunal to re - appreciate the facts and evidence and to arrive at a conclusion different from that of the Enquiry Officer . Hence, the Respondent prays that the claim ofthe Petitioner Union may be rejected.

10. In such circumstances , the points for my consideration are-

The Petitioner Union has raised this dispute espousing the cause of Smt . Sathyabama, who is working as Clerk in Perambur Branch of the Respondent/Bank. The concerned workman was charge sheeted on 25-6-99 alleging that she and her colleague led demonstration of part -time employees during the inaugural function to total computerisation of T. Nagar branch was going on and distributed leaf let/pamphlets to the persons who attended the said function on 18-6-99 and thereby tarnished the image of the bank in the eyes of the public and it is an act prejudicial to the interest of the bank. though the concerned workrnan has given her explanation to the Respondent/Management , the Respondent Bank has ordered an enquiry rejecting here explanation . During the enquiry , the management produced three witnesses in support of their case and on the workmen side 21 witnesses were examined . But without taking into account the deposition given by the defence witnesses , the Enquiry Officer with pre -determination decidedto support the management witnesses and has given a report stating that the charge levelled against the workman was proved. The Disciplinary Authority also without considering the submissions made by the concerned employee proposed to impose the punishment of reduction in basic pay by two stages for two years and after the personal , hearing the Disciplinary Authority has awarded the punishment of reduction in basic pay by one stage for one year. Even , the appeal preferred by the concerned employee before Appellate Authority has been (i) "Whether the imposition of punishment of reduction in basic pay by one stage for one year to the concerned employee by the Respondent/Bank is legal and justified?

7082

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA I , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

against the employee as they were clearly established. In this case , the punishment awarded to the concerned employee for misconduct committed by her is fullyjustified and valid in law and the same should not be interfered for any of the reasons urged in the Claim Statement filed before this Tribunal . The jurisdiction of this Tribunal in dealing with disputes other than those under section 11A ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is to consider whether the finding are wholly unsupported by any evidence so as to call it perverse . It is not permissible for the Petitioner Union to invite this Tribunal to re - appreciate the facts and evidence and to arrive at a conclusion different from that ofthe Enquiry Officer . Hence , the Respondent prays that the claim of the Petitioner Union may be rejected .

15. In such circumstances , the points for my consideration are :-

( i) " Whehter the imposition of punishment of reduction in basic pay by one stage for one year to the concerned employee by the Respondent/ Bank is legal and justified ?

(ii) To what reliefthe concerned employee is entitled to?"

16. Since the relief claimed in all these three industrial disputes is identical , they are clubbed together and disposed of through this common Award.

Point No. 1

negatived . It is submitted that the entire enquiry proceedings are wrongful . The conclusion has been drawn on the basis of pre - determined , bias against the trade union and not based on any direct or circumstantial evidence led against the concerned employee . The observation made by the Enquiry Officer clearly established that he has enquired the casewith a pre-determined mind. The Enquiry Officer rejected the entire evidence led by the defence witnesses , since most of them belonging to the category ofbackward communities , scheduled caste/ scheduled tribe and on the ground that they are not qualitative evidences . On seeing the concerned workman in trade union activities , the Respondent/ Management has become very critical about it and on their attempt to intimidate her other activities , the charge sheet has been concocted . There is no evidence to implicate the concerned employee to the alleged distribution of pamphlets and even assuming that the concerned employee has distributed the pamphlets , it cannot be said to be an act prejudicial to the interest of the bank . It was a peaceful demonstration exposing the illegal action of the bank in not complying with the settlement . Therefore, the concerned employee has not committed any misconduct and the punishment imposed by the bank for no fault of the concerned emplyee is illegal , arbitrary, malafide , victimisation and unfair labour practice. Hence, the Petitioner Union prays for an award in their favour.

17. The case of the Petitioner is that on 18-6-99, the Respondent/Bank arranged a function at 8.30 a.m. on Friday for the total computerisation of the T. Nagar branch and it was to be inaugurated by the then Chairman & Managing Director Sri K.V. Krishnamurthy. While so , the management of the Respondent/Bank even though entered info the settlement in the year 1986 has not implemented the agreement with regard to the services of casual/ temporary workers . Therefore , the union requested the management to implement the settlement failing which demonstration would be conducted and the Union asked the concerned employees to participate in the silent demonstration . As such , the concerned employees participated in the silent demonstration in which pamphlets were also issued by the temporary employees /part-time sweepers . For this the Respondent/Bank management has charge sheeted the concerned employees on the ground that they have tarnished the image of the bank in the eyes of public and it is an act prejudicial to the interest of the bank and the domestic enquiry was conducted by the Respondent/ Management and a punishment was also imposed against the concerned employees . In this dispute the Petitioner Union has not questioned the conduct of the domestic enquiry but the Petitioner Union has raised doubt about the findings given by the Enquiry Officer on the ground that it was perverse and mala fide . On the other hand, the 14. As against this , the Respondent in their Counter Statement contended that the referred dispute being a collective dispute under section 2( k) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Petitioner Union is bound to establish its competence and authority to take up the cause of rive workmen and raise an industrial dispute . In this case, the trade union activities cannot be a shield for indulging in acts of misconduct . On 18-6-99 , the Respondent/Bank has organised a function at 8.30 a.m. for total computerisation of T. Nagar branch and it was to be inaugurated by the then Chairman & Managing Director of the bank Sri K.V. Krishnamoorthy in the presence of prominent persons . While so , without any prior notice, the concerned employee along with two others led a group of part-time sweepers and scavengers who were wearing adbands and they distributed pamphlets purported to be a representation against the non- regularisation of part- time employees. The concerned employee was not an employee ofthe T. Nagar branch . Therefore , a charge sheet was issued and even in the explanation the concerned employee has not disputed her presence nor she has disputed her participation in demonstration which she would describe as a " call of duty" assigned by the Petitioner Union. The Enquiry Officer , on considering the mierits of the case , has held that the charges have been proved 7083 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

Respondent/Management has raised a preliminary objections, as the first objection that being a collective dispute under section 2( k) of the Industrial Disputes Act , the Petitioner Union is bound to establish its competence and authority to take up the cause of the workmen and raise industrial dispute ; secondly , it was contended on behalf of the Respondent/Management that adjudication ofthis industrial dispute does not fall within the scope of Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act . In the matter of adjudication of disputes other than that falling under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, the Tribunal cannot act as an Appellate Court . The jurisdiction of this Tribunal in dealing with the dispute is to consider whether the finding iswholly unsupported by any evidence so as to call it as perverse . Therefore , it is not permissible for the Petitioner Union to invite this Tribunal to re- appreciate the facts and arrive at a different conclusion from that of Enquiry Officer and therefore , the Respondent/Management prays to reject the claim of the Petitioner Union .

18. In these circumstances , the Tribunal is to see whether the finding of the Enquiry Officer against the concerned employees is perverse i.e. to say, ' whether it is wholly unsupported by any evidence ' , ' whether the finding is mala fide in nature' .

only identified only the concerned employees alone and thisclearly prove that she has been tutored to make this evidence before the Enquiry Officer . It is further argued that the Enquiry Officer has relied on the photographs taken on the occasion and produced before the enquiry . But, these photographs did not indicate that the concerned employees were in the act of distributing the pamphlets of Union . They were standing like any other spectators and merely she had a paper in her hand . It does not mean that she has distributed pamphlets to the public . Further , the Enquiry Officer has rejected the deposition of one Mr. M.A. Balakrishnan , Joint Treasurer of the Union on the ground that two other activists of the Union namely Mr. N.G. Chandrasekar, Treasurer of union and Smt . E. Sriranjani , Workmen Director in T. Nagar Branch presented in the occasion were not taken part in the protest and he has been harping on as to why these persons have not been examined in the enquiry . On the other hand , he has not taken note of the Deputy General Manager and Assistant General Manager , who have been taken part in the meeting, have not been examined on the side of the Respondent/ Management . This shows his biased view and also his prejudicial nature in conduct of the enquiry and his pre- determined bias against the concemed employees and also the trade union activities .

19. Both sides have not examined any party as a witness before this Tribunal . They have marked only the enquiry proceedings . On the side of the 1 Party Ex. WI to W9 were marked and on the side ofthe II Party/Management Ex . MI to M15 were marked.

22. Even though , it is stated that the participation of the concerned employees in the silent demonstration is prejudice to the interest of the bank, it has not been established how it was prejudiced to the interest of the bank. Even though , the management witnesses MWI and MW2 have been examined on the side ofthe management, they have not established before the Enquiry Officer how it was prejudiced to the interest of the bank management . Further, in this case though the defence witnesses have stated that they have also participated in the peaceful demonstration outside the T. Nagar branch of the Respondent/Bank , the Respondent/ Management has chosen only the concerned employees and charge sheeted against them will amply prove their biased nature against the concerned employees . The finding of the Enquiry Officer inthis regard is perverse and with mala fide intention, the Enquiry Officer in a predetermined bias has come to the conclusion that the charge against the concerned employees had been proved .

20. The attack ofthe Petitioner Union on the Enquiry Officer's report is that the Enquiry Officer has not taken into consideration the depositions made by twenty one defence witnesses and with a pre - determination decided to support the management and proceeded to say that the allegations against the concerned employees were proved . The Enquiry Officer termed all the defence witnesses as ' unreliable ' , ' only a story and unreliable evidence ' , ' evidence suffers from vagueness ' ' evidence suffers from accuracy' , evidence lacks authenticity ' , ' evidence is contrary to evidence on records ' , ' nothing but a fairy tale ' , 'lacks credibility ' etc. On the other hand , he has relied on the pampered and tutored two management witnesses namely the Sub - Manager of T. Nagar branch of the Respondent/Bank and also an Officer from Zonal Office . This clearly proves that he is biased against the concerned employees .

23. But , on the other hand , the counsel for the Respondent argued that without any prior notice to the Respondent/Management, the concerned employees led a group of part-time sweepers and they distributed leaflets to the public and it vitiated the atmosphere of celebration and an ugly scene was deliberately created by the concerned employees . Further , the concerned employees were not employees of T. Nagar branch and they continued to stay outside the T. Nagar branch till the function was over . The concerned employees have not disputed the fact with regard to their presence nor they disputed their 21. It is further argued on behalf of the Petitioner that the management witness No. I has clearly admitted that she might have come out of the branch premises one or two occasions to receive the guests and she has clearly admitted that she was assigned the job of organising the programme to be conducted inside the branch premises . It is her further admission that some temporary servants and employees were in the demonstration , while so , she has 7084

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004 /KARTIKA 1 , 1926

givenon the side of the concerned employees are unreliable and unsatisfactory. But, to what reasons that the evidence given by the defence witnesses were unreliable aře nót statedby the Enquiry Officer . Even from the beginning of thereport, I find the Enquiry Officer with a prejudicial view has approached the case and has come to the conclusion that the charges framed against the employees were proved as alleged by the Respondent/Management. When he relied on the evidences given on the side of the management, he has not stated any valid reasons for rejecting the evidences given by the defence witnesses , which clearly proves that his approach is prejudicial in nature and the finding is perverse.

24. Then the other question to be decided is the technical objection raised by the Respondent/Management side . On behalf of the Respondent/Management , it is contended that being a collective dispute under section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act , the Petitioner Union is bound to establish its competence and authority to take up the cause of the workman and raise the industrial dispute . In this case , the Petitioner Union has not produced any document to show that by a resolution or by an authority, the Petitioner Union is permitted to espouse the cause of the concerned employees and raise industrial dispute .. Under such circumstances , thisdispute cannot lie before thisTribunal as an industrial dispute . Further , he relied on the ruling reported in 1973 II LLJ 341 The Management of Madura Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer , Industrial Tribunal , Madras and Others , wherein the Madras High Court has held that " if the dispute relates to any of the other matters contemplated in Section 2K, then the parties to the dispute should have a direct or substantial interest . In other words, the persons who seek to support the cause ofthe concernedworkman must themselves be directly or substantially interested in the dispute and such persons should be considerable or substantial in number " . Further , they relied on the ruling reported in 1961 II LLJ 436 Bombay Journalists Union Vs. Hindu , wherein the Supreme Court has observed that " the dispute in the present case being prima-facie an individual dispute in order that it may become an industrial dispute, it had to establish that it had been taken up by the Union of employees or by appreciable number of employees . " Again the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Deepak Industries Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal 1975 Lab IC 1153 has held that "when the authority ofthe union is challenged by the employer, it must be shown by production of material evidence before the Tribunal to which such a dispute has been referred to prove that the union has been duly authorised either by a resolution of its members or otherwise that it had an authority to represent the workmen whose cause it was espousing . " Therefore , it is argued on behalf of the Respondent that the Petitioner Union has not proved before this Court that they have got an authority to represent the concerned employees and to participation in the demonstration for which they call it as " a call of duty" assigned by the Petitioner Union . In this case, the concerned employees have not disputed the manner in . which the enquiry was conducted . They disputed only the finding given by the Enquiry Officer on several grounds for which they have no right to question the same because , this Tribunal is not an Appellate Authority and concerned employees cannot question the appreciation of evidence given by the Enquiry Officer. It is his further contention that the Deputy Chief Officer of Regional Officer Mrs. R. Jayalakshmi and Chief Manager ofT. Nagar branch have clearly and categorically stated that the concerned employees have distributed the pamphlets and also participated in the demonstration and therefore , on relying on the evidence of management witnesses , the Enquiry Officer has held that the charges against the concerned employees have been proved . At the same time, he has rejected the evidences of defence witnesses examined on the side of the concerned, employees on the ground that they are unreliable and they are not trustworthy . Under such circumstances, it cannot be said that the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse. Further the punishment awarded to the concerned employees for the misconduct committed by them on 18-6-99 was fully justified and valid in law and the same should not be interfered with for all or any of the reason urged by the Petitioner Union . Further , on 18-6-99 the concerned employees have not applied for leave and they have remained unauthorisedly absent . Further, the part played by the concerned employees in front of T. Nagar Branch on 18-6-99 cannot be treated as legitimate trade union activities. In any event , the concerned employees were the first and foremost , employees of the Respondent/ Bank and then only the members of union . Therefore, they were expected not to indulge in any act which would prejudicial to the interest ofthe bank and their memberships ofthe Union would not confer immunity against indulgence ofmisconduct . In this case , since this Tribunal is not an Appellate Authority and since the conduct of the enquiry was not questioned by the concerned employees , this Tribunal cannot question the punishment awarded by the Respondent/Bank by conducting the domestic enquiry. It is his further argument that it is only in cases of discharge or dismissal by way of punishment Section 11A vests discretionary jurisdiction in the Tribunal to direct reinstatment with or without any terms or conditions or to vary the punishment as the circumstances of a case may warrant and therefore , Section 11A only apply to the cases of punishment of dismissal or discharge and it does not apply to other cases such as warning , fine , withholding of increment , demotion or suspension etc. Since this dispute is not coming under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act , this Tribunal cannot vary or reduce the punishment imposed by the Respondent/ Bank on the concerned employees . Though , I find much force in this contention , in this case the Enquiry Officer has held that the evidence [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

raise industrial dispute before this Tribunal and therefore , the present disputes cannot be termed as industrial disputes as contemplated under Section 2( k) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

25. On the other hand , on behalf of the Petitioner Union it was contended that this plea has not been taken during the conciliation proceedings and therefore , now they cannot taken the same before this Tribunal . But, the Petitioner Union has not established this contention by producing any documents before this Tribunal. As such , I find the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent is valid in law . Therefore , I find this point against the Petitioner Union .

Point No. 2 :-

The next point to be decided in these cases is to whatrelief the concerned employees are entitled?

26. In view of my relevant findings , I find this point also against the Petitioner Union . As such, the claim of the Petitioner Union is dismissed in all the three industrial disputes . No Costs .

27. The references are answered accordingly .

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 28th November, 2003. )

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :-

None

Oneither side :

Common documents Marked :-

Forthe I Party/Claimant :

Date

Ex. No.

Description

(3)

(1)

(2)

WI 25-06-99 Xerox copy of the charge sheet issued to Concerned employee .

07-07-99

Xerox copy of the explanation submitted by Concerned employee to Respondent. 07-03-2000

Xerox copy of the enquiry proceedings.

W4 22-07-2000 Xerox copy of the letter from the Respondent Enclosing the order ofDisciplinary Authority. 24-08-2000

Xerox copy of the letter from Smt . Usha Kiran to Appellate Authority.

19-10-2000

Xerox copy of the order of Appellate Authority. 05-04-2000

Xerox copy of the written brief subrnitted by Concerned employees on enquiry proceedings .

7085

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

(3)

(2)

(1)

W8 15-05-2000 Xerox copy of the written submissions submitted by Smt. Vanmathi Jayaseelan to Disciplinary Authority.

27-02-2002

Xerox copy of the industrial dispute raised by Petitioner Union before Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) .

For the II Party/Management :-

Date

Ex. No.

Description

22-06-99

Xeroxcopyofthe letter from Senior Branch Manager to Regional Manager .

Nil

Xerox copy of the notice .

Nil

Xerox copy of the photos relating to T. Nagar Branch function .

M4 Nil

Xerox copy of the invitation of T. Nagar function Regarding total branch mechanisation .

03-04-87

Xerox copy of the Minutes ofjoint meeting between I party and 11 Il party.

28-03-89

Xerox copy ofthe Minutes ofjoint meeting between I party and 11 party.

M7 08-09-99 Xerox copy ofthe Minutes ofjoin meeting between I party and Il party.

M8 06-06-99 Xerox copy of the circular issued by Petitioner Union .

M9 03-06-99 Xerox copy of the circular issued by Petitioner Union.

07-05-99

M10

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner Union to General Manager of Respondent/Bank .

24-03-99

MII

Xerox copy ofthe circular issued by Petitioner Union .

27-01-99

M12

Xerox copy of the circular issued by Petitioner Union .

23-03-99

M13

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner Union to Chairman and Managing Director of Respondent.

05-10-94

M14

Xerox copy of the circular issued by Petitioner Union .

05-10-94

M15

Xerox copy of the minutes of meeting between 1 party and II party.

7086

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th September , 2004 श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर , 2004

S.O. 2697.- In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-sections ( 1 ) and (2 ) of Section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) and in continuation of this Ministry'snotification No. A- 11016/ 1 /99- CLS - II dated 6-7-2000 , the Central Government hereby constitutes Labour Court with Headquarters at Bhubaneswar for the adjudication of industrial disputes relating to any matter specified in the Second Schedule to the said Act and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to it under the said Act , and appoints Shri N.K.R. Mohapatra as Presiding Officer of that Court with effect from 30-7-2004 (F.N. ) .

का. आ. 2696.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 7 -क की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एवं इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 6-7-2000 की अधिसूचना सं. ए-11016/ 1/99-सी एल एस -11 केअनुक्रममें उक्त अधिनियम की दूसरी अथवा तीसरी अनुसूची में उल्लिखित औद्योगिक विवाद के किसी भी मामले के निर्णयन हेतु और उक्त अधिनियम के अंतर्गत सौंपे जाने वाले ऐसे अन्य कार्यों को करनेके लिए एक औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण का गठन करती है, जिसका मुख्यालय भुवनेश्वर में होगा तथा श्री एन . के. आर . मोहपात्रा को दिनांक 30-7-2004 ( पूर्वाह्न ) से उस न्यायाधिकरण का पीठीसीन अधिकारी नियुक्तकरती हैं ।

[F. No. A- 11016/1/99 -CLS- II ] P. K. TAMRAKAR, Under Secy.

[फा. सं. ए-11016/1/99- सी.एल.एस.- II ] पी. के. ताम्रकार, अवर सचिव

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , the 30th September , 2004

का. आ. 2698.-गोदी कामगार ( सुरक्षा, स्वास्थ्य, और कल्याण ) अधिनियम, 1986 ( 1986 का 54 ) की धारा 9 और गोदी कामगार ( सुरक्षा, स्वास्थ्य, और कल्याण ) नियमावली , 1990 के नियम 9 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 89 ( अ) दिनांक 21-1-2002 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्तअधिसूचना में, क्रम संख्या 9 के लिए और उससे सम्बन्धित प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रतिस्थापित किया जाए, अर्थात्:-

सदस्य S.O. 2696. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of Section 7 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) and in continuation of this Ministry'snotification No. A- 11016 / 1 /99-CLS - 11 dated 6-7-2000 , the Central Government hereby constitutes an Industrial Tribunal with Headquarters at Bhubaneswar for the adjudication of industrial disputes relating to any matter specified in the Second Schedule or the Third Sehedule and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to it under the said Act, and appoints Shri N.K.R. Mohapatra as Presiding Officer of the Tribunal with effect from30-7-2004 ( F.Ν.) .

[ F. No. A - 11016/ 1/99-CLS - 11 ]

" 9. कैप्टन वी.के. सिंह मैसर्स श्रेयास शिपिंग लिमिटेड, 912इम्बेसी सेन्टर, नरिमन प्वाँइट, मुम्बई -400021

P. K. TAMRAKAR , Under Secy .

[फा. सं. एस. -17025/ 2/93 - आई एस एच-11 ] नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2004

सी. ए. भास्करन, निदेशक

टिप्पण : मूल आदेश अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 89 ( अ ) दिनांक 21-1-02 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II खण्ड 3 , उप-खण्ड( ii ) दिनांक 21-1-2002 में प्रकाशित किया गया था ।

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004 का. आ. 2697.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एवं इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 6-7-2000 की अधिसूचना सं. ए-11016/ 1/99-सी एल एस-11 के अनुक्रम में उक्त अधिनियम की दूसरी अनुसूची में उल्लिखित औद्योगिक विवाद के किसी भी मामले के निर्णयन हेतु और उक्त अधिनियम के अंतर्गत सौंपे जाने वाले ऐसे अन्य कार्यों को करने के लिए एक श्रम न्यायालय का गठन करती है , जिसका मुख्यालय भुवनेश्वर में होगा तथा श्री एन.के. आर. मोहपात्रा को दिनांक 30-7-2004 ( पूर्वाह्न ) से उस न्यायालय का पीठीसीन अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है ।

S.O. 2698.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 9 of the Dock Workers (Safety, Health & Welfare) Act, 1986 (54 of 1986) and rule 9 of the Dock Workers (Safety, Health and Welfare) Rules , 1990 , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour No. S.O. 89 ( E) dated 21st January , 2002 , namely:--

[फा. सं. ए-11016/1/99-सी.एल.एस. - 11 ] पी.के. ताम्रकार , अवर सचिव 7087 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23, 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

In the said notification , for serial number 9 and entries relating thereto , the following shall be substituted, namely:--

Thonukal of Kovilpatti Taluk in Tuticorin District & Zamin Devarkulam , Vadakkupatti , Ilayarasanenthal , Ayyaneri , Appaneri , Pillayarnatham of Sankarankoil Taluk in Tirunelveli District ."

Member

[No. S-38013/74/2004- SS.I ]

K. C. JAIN , Director "9. Captain V. K. Singh , M/sShreyas Shipping Limited 912Embassy Centre , Nariman Point, Mumbai -400021 .

नई दिल्ली, 12 अक्तूबर, 2004 [F. No. S- 17025 /2 /93 - ISH - II] C. A. BHASKARAN , Director

Note : The principal order was published vide Notification No. S.O. 89 ( E) Dated 21-01-2002 in the Gazette of India , Part II , Section 3 , Sub- Section ( ii) dated 21-01-2002

का. आ. 2700.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 नवम्बर, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय- 4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय- 5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडु राज्यके निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: - नई दिल्ली , 12 अक्तूबर, 2004

" जिला तिरूणलवेली के संकरनकोयिल तालुक में राजस्व ग्राम- नार्थ कुरिविकुलम, साउथ कुरिविकुलम, अथिपट्टी एवं रामलिंगपुरम केअधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र । "

[सं. एस -38013/73/2004 - एसएस -1 ] के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 12th October , 2004 का. आ. 2699.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 नवम्बर, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय- 4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय- 5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्: -

" तूतुक्कुडी जिला में कोविलपट्टी तालुक के नालाट्टिन्युदूर , मुडुक्कुमीण्टानपट्टी, वानरमुट्टी तोणुकाल और तिरूणलवेली जिला में संकरनकोयिल तालुक के जमीन देवरकुलम वडक्कुपट्टी, इलेयरसनेन्तल , अटयनेरी , अप्पनेरी, पिल्लैयारनत्तम आदि के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र ।"

S.O. 2700.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (3 ) of Section I of the Employees State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st November, 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44. and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI ( except sub - section (i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely :---

[सं. एस-38013/74/2004- एस.एस.- 1 ] के.सी. जैन, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 12th October , 2004

"Areas comprising the revenue villages of North Kuruvilkulam , South Kuruvikula , Athipatti & Ramalingapuram in Sankarankoil Taluk of Tirunelveli District."

[No. S- 38013 /73/2004-SS.I ]

K.C. JAIN , Director

नई दिल्ली, 12 अक्तूबर , 2004 S.O. 2699 .-- In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the Ist November , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter V and VI (except sub - section (i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely:-

का. आ. 2701.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 नवम्बर, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) "Areas comprising the revenue villages of Nalattinpudu , Mudukkumeendanpatti , Vanaramutti , [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 7088

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 23 , 2004/KARTIKA 1 , 1926

New Delhi , the 13th October, 2004

अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: -

" तिरूणलवेली जिला तालुक के गंगैकोणडान भाग -1 एवं भाग -11 और अलंगारपेरी के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र । "

[सं. एस-38013/75/2004- एस.एस. 1 ] के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 12th October , 2004

S.O. 2702.- Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so required that in pursuance of the provisions of sub - clause (vi ) of the clause (n ) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 907 dated 29-3-2004 the service in the Security Paper Mill, Hoshangabad which is covered by item 21 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act, for a period of six months from the 15th April , 2004 .

And whereas, the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months .

S.O. 2701 .--- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the Ist November , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Section 44 and 45which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI [ except sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely :--

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub - clause (vi ) of clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 15th October, 2004 .

"Areas comprising the revenue villages of Gangaikondan Part 1 & Part II and Alangaraperi of Tirunelveli Taluk and District . "

[F. No. S. - 11017/ 16/ 97 - IR (PL) ] J.P. PATI , Jt. Secy .

[No. S-38013 /75/2004- SS.1 ]

K.C. JAIN , Director

नई दिल्ली, 14 अक्तूबर, 2004

नई दिल्ली, 13 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2703.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 नवम्बर, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78 , 79 और 81. के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडू राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्: - का. आ. 2702.- केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 47 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 907 दिनांक29-3-2004 द्वारा सिक्युरिटी पेपर मिल, होशंगाबाद, जो कि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 21 में शामिल हैं, को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 15-4-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

" तिरूणलवेली जिला में पालयमकोट्टे तालुक के सिवनडियरकुलम के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र । "

और केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है;

[सं. एस-38013/76/2004- एस.एस. 1 ] के.सी. जैन , निदेशक

New Delhi , the 14th October , 2004 अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप - खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 15-10-2004 से छः मास की कालावधिके लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

S.O. 2703. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st November, 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Section 44 and [फा. सं. एस-11017/16/97 - आई.आर. ( पी.एल. ) ] जे.पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव 7089 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 23 , 2004/कार्तिक 1 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

" तमिलनाडु राज्य के जिला वैल्लूर के तालुक कडपडीमें राजस्व ग्राम अम्मननकुप्पम के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र । "

[सं. एस -38013/77/2004 - एस.एस. 1 ]

के.सी. जैन , निदेशक 45which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI [ except sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely :-

New Delhi, the 15th October, 2004 "Areas comprising the revenue villages of Sivanadiyarkulam of Palayamkottai Taluk in Tirunelveli District . "

[No. S -38013/76/2004- SS.I ] K.C. JAIN, Director

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2004

S.O. 2704. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st November , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Section 44 and 45which have already been brought into force) and Chapter V and VI [ except sub- section ( 1 ) ofSection 76- and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely :-

"Areas comprising the revenue villages of Ammanankuppam of Kadpadi Taluk in Vellore District. "

[No. S- 38013/77 /2004-SS.I ] K.C. JAIN , Director का. आ. 2704.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 नवम्बर, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा-76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road , and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.