This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं० डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/ 2003-05

सत्यमेव जयत

REGD . No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली, नवम्बर 21 नवम्बर 27 , 2004 , शनिवार /कार्तिक 30 अग्रहायण 6 , 1926 NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 21-NOVEMER 27 , 2004, SATURDAY/KARTIKA 30- AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 सं. 48] No. 48 ]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3- उप-खण्ड (ii) PART II- Section 3-Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issuedby the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence )

कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय (कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3021.- केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए बंगलौर के अधिवक्ताओं सर्वश्री बी. आर. नंजुनदैया और विजय कुमार एम. शीलवंत को बंगलौर में विचारण न्यायालयों में दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा संस्थित मामला सं. आरसी एसआईज़े 2004 ई 0003 , आरसी एसआईजे 2004 ई 0004 और आरसी एसआईजे 2004 ई 0006 के अभियोजन तथा अपील/ पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय अथवा किसी अन्य न्यायालय में तथा उनसे संबंधित अर्थैदा आनुषंगिक अपीलों, पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषय का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[सं० 225/24/2004- एवीडी- II ] बी. राजगोपाल नायडू, निदेशक 3422 G1 / 2004

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL , PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training) New Delhi , the 10th November, 2004 S. O. 3021. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) the Central Government hereby appoints S/Shri B. R. Nanjundaiah and Vijay Kumar M. Sheelvant , Advocates Bangalore as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution in Case Nos . RC. SIJ 2004E0003 , RC. SIJ 2004E0004 and RC . SIJ 2004E0006 instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment in trial courts at Bangalore and appeals . revisions or other matter connected therewith or incidents thereto in the appellate/ revision or in any other court .

[No. 225/24/2004-AVD- II ]

B. RAJAGOPAL NAIDU , Director

(8627) 8628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2004,

करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 143 पीसीआर दिनांक 14-09-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से ( 1 ) श्री बी. वी. इलूर, पूर्व शाखा प्रबंधक, बैंक ऑफ इंडिया रिचमोंड टाउनशाखा, बंगलौर ( 2 ) श्री जे. एन. प्रभाकर, प्रबंध निदेशक, मैसर्स मेनक्सऑटो लिमिटेड, बंगलौर ( 3 ) श्री श्रीनिवास जागीरदार गोपाल, मैसर्स श्याम इंडस्ट्रीज, बंगलौर ( 4 ) श्री धनंजय चौहान, निदेशक, मैसर्स मेनक्स ऑटो लिमिटेड, बंगलौर ( 5 ) श्री ए. के. कुलकर्णी, मैसर्स कुलकर्णी एसोसिएटस, बंगलौर ( 6 ) श्री यू. एल. सोमप्पा, एडवोकेट, बंगलौर एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध 2001 से 2002 तक की अवधि के दौरान अनुचित साख- सुविधाएं प्रदान करने और फलस्वरूप बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, बंगलौर को 377.07 लाख रु. की अनुचित हानि पहुंचाने के मामले में भारतीय दंड संहिता 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम 45 ) की धारा 120 बी सपठित धारा 420,467, 468 और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 (1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 (1 ) (डी) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता 'का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

का.आ. 3022.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 151 पीसीआर दिनांक 14-09-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से ( 1 ) श्री जे . बालकृष्ण पाई , पूर्व शाखा प्रबंधक, केनरा बैंक, पानम्बूर शाखा, मंगलौर ( 2 ) श्री बी. अब्दुल रहमान, मालिक मैसर्स जबाल ग्रेनेटीज, फरंगीपेट, डीके जिला , कर्नाटक ( 3 ) मैसर्स जबाल ग्रेनेटीज, फरंगीपेट, डीके . जिला, कर्नाटक और अन्यों एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध 2001 से 2002 तक की अवधि के दौरान अनुचित साख- सुविधाएं प्रदान करने और फलस्वरूप केनरा बैंक, मंगलौर को 2.35 करोड़ रु. की अनुचित हानि पहुंचाने के मामले में भारतीय दंड संहिता 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम 45 ) की धारा 120- बी सपठित धारा 409, 420, 468 और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( डी) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

[फा० सं० 228/81 /2004 - एवीडी- II ] [फा० सं० 228/80/2004- एवीडी- II ]

बी. आर. नायडू, निदेशक बी. आर. नायडू, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 10th November, 2004 New Delhi , the 10th November, 2004

S. O. 3022. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946). the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka, vide Notification No. HD 151 PCR 2004 dated 14-09-2004 hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole ofthe State of Karnataka for investigation of offences punishable under section 120- B read with 409, 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) and Section 13 (2) read with 13 (1 ) (d) ofPrevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ( Act No. 49 of 1988) against ( 1 ) Shri J. Balakrishna Pai, formerly Branch Manager. Canara Bank, Panambur Branch. Mangalore (2) Shri B. Abdul Rehman. Proprietor , M/ s . Zabal Granites , Farangipet. DK District, Karnataka (3 ) M/ s. Zabal Granites , Farangipet, DK District, Karnataka and others in the matter of extending under credit facilities and thereby causing wrongful loss of Rs. 2.35 crores to Canara Bank, Mangalore during the period from 2001 to 2002, and any other public servants or persons in relation to, or in connection with the said offences. and any other offinces committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/80/2004-AVD. - II]

B. RAJAGOPAL NAIDU, Director

नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2004

S. O. 3023. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946), the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka , vide Notification No. HD 143 PCR 2004 dated 14-09-2004, hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offences punishable under section 120 - B read with 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code . 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and Section 13 (2) read with 13 ( 1 ) (d) ofPrevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988) against ( 1 ) Shri B. V. Islur, formerly Branch Manager, Bank of India Richmond Town Branch, Bangalore (2 ) Shri J. N. Prabhakar, Managing Director, M/s. Manx Auto Limited, Bangalore (3 ) Shri Srinivas Jagirdar Gopal , Proprietor, M/ s . Shyam Industries, Bangalore (4) Shri Dhananjaya Chavan, Director , M/ s Manx Auto Limited, Bangalore ( 5 ) Shri A. K. Kulkarni , M/ s. Kulkani Associates, Bangalore (6 ) U. L. Somappa , Advocate. Bangalore in the matter of extending undue credit faciliti and thereby causing wrongful loss of Rs . 377.07 lakhs to theBank of India , Bangalore during the period from 2001 to 2002, and any other public servants or persons in relation to, or in connection with the said offences , and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

का.आ. 3023.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग

[F. No. 228/81/2004-AVD. - II] B. RAJAGOPAL NAIDU, Director 8629 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रह्मयण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 10th November, 2004 नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2004

S. O. 3025. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (8) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting the prosecution of Fake Stamp Paper cases ( Telgi cases) instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment ( CBI ) or caseswhich have been taken over by the Central Bureau ofInvestigation as per directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India before competent criminal court in the State of Maharashtra and appeals / revisions or other matters arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law .

1. Shri R. B. Thakre

का०आ० 3024.- केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनिनाम सं० 25 ) की धारा 6 सपठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त क्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए बिहार राज्य सरकार के गृह ( पुलिस ) विभाग की अधिसूचना सं० 1 /सीबीआई/8010/ 2004 एच ( पी ) / 9574/पटना दिनांक 3-9- 2004 द्वारा प्राप्त बिहार राज्य सरकार की सहमति से हरजिंदर सिंह उर्फ बिट्टूके लापता होने के संबंध में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 काअधिनियम सं ० 45 ) की धारा 364 के अधीन के० अ० ब्यूरो, एससीबी, चंडीगढ़ में दर्ज मामला आरसी 2 ( एस ) /04/एससीबी/चंडीगढ़ दिनांक 2-6-2004 और उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त किसी अन्य अपराध (अपराधों ) के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण बिहार राज्य पर करती है ।

2. Shri A. M. Chimalkar 3. Shri Pradeep D. Gharat

[फा० सं० 228/51 /2004- ए० वी० डी०- II ] बी० आर० नायडु , निदेशक

New Delhi , the 10th November, 2004

[F. No. 225/18/2004 -AVD . - II] B. RAJAGOPAL NAIDU , Director

नई दिल्ली , 11 नवम्बर, 2004

S. O. 3024. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act . 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Governnient with the consent of State Government of Bihar, vide Home ( Police ) Department Notification No. 1 /CBI/8010/2004 H (P )/9574/Patna dated 3-9-2004 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establislıment to the whole of the State of Bihar for investigation of case RC 2( S )/ 04/ SCB /CHG dated 2-6-2004 , u/s 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at CBI , SCB , Chandigarh , regarding missing of Harjinder Singh @ Bittoo and other offence ( s) in relation to or in connection with the said offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[F. No. 228/51/2004-AVD. - II]

B. RAJAGOPAL NAIDU, Director

नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2004

का०आ० 3025.- केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं ० 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को, दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( सी० बी० आई ० ) द्वारा चलाये गये, जाली स्टाम्प पेपर के मुकदमों ( तेलगी मामलों ) में अभियोजन चलाने अथवा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में सक्षम फौजदारी अदालत के समक्ष वे मामले जो भारत के माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय के निर्देशों के अनुसार केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा हाथ में लिए गए हों, और विधि द्वारा स्थापित अपीलीय अथवा पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/पुनरीक्षणों - थवा अन्य मामलों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक दं रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

1. श्री आर ० बी० ठाकरे

2. श्री ए० एम ० चिमालकर

का०आ ० 3026.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं ० 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं० एचडी 155 पीसीआर 2004 दिनांक 23-09-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से ( 1 ) श्री के० सुब्रामान्या, डाक सहायक ( निलंबनाधीन ), एचएएल- II स्टेज एचपीओ, बंगलौर-560008 ( 2 ) श्री एम० कोल्लैया, डाक सहायक ( निलंबनाधीन ) , एचएएल- II स्टेज एचपीओ , बंगलौर- 560008 ( 3 ) श्री के० गांधी, डाक सहायक, इंदिरा नगर डाकघर, बंगलौर -560038 ( 4 ) श्री महेन्द्र पी० जैन, निवासी-3998 , ज्वैलरी स्ट्रीट, शिवाजी नगर, बंगलौर ( 5 ) श्री नरसिम्हा, नं ० 15/18 , विवेकानंद नगर, कत्रीगुप्पे मेन रोड, बानाशंकरी- III स्टेज, बंगलौर -560085 तथा अन्य अज्ञात व्यक्तियों एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध 4 लाख रुपये मूल्य के किसान विकास पत्रों के गैर - कानूनी रूप से नकदीकरण कराने से संबंधित उनके कपटपूर्ण कृत्यों के लिए भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम 45 ) की धारा 120 - बी सपठित धारा 420, 467 , 468 और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं० 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( डी) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों तथा तत्संबंधी सारभूत अपराधों और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

3. श्री प्रदीप डी० धारत

[फा० सं ० 228 /82/2004- ए० वी ० डी०-11 ] बी० आर ० नायडु, निदेशक [फा० सं० 225/ 18 /2004- ए० वी ० डी०-11 ] बी० आर ० नायडु, निदेशक 8630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

[ PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 11th November, 2004

सारणी

अधिकारी का नाम

सार्वजनिक परिसर और क्षेत्राधिकार कीस्थानीय सीमा

उप महाप्रबंधक ( एटीटी- पूर्वी क्षेत्र ) 3 जी एवरेस्ट बिल्डिंग , 46 सी जवाहरलाल नेहरू रोड, कोलकाता-700071

सभी परिसर जो भारत पर्यटन विकास निगम लिमिटेड के हैं , या उनके द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए हैं और पश्चिम बंगाल , बिहार, उड़ीसा और असम राज्यों में स्थित हैं ।

[सं० 6/21 /91 - पी एस यू ( टी ) ] रेनूजैन, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF TOURISM

New Delhi , the 5th November, 21 )1) 4 S. O. 3026. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ), the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka , vide Notification No. HD 155 PCR 2004 dated 23-109-2004 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offences punishable under Section 120 - B read with Section 421) , 467 , 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) and Section 13 ( 2 ) read with 13 ( 1 ) ( d ) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ( Act No. 49 of 1988 ) and substantive offences thereof against ( 1 ) Shri K. Subramanya , Postal Assistant ( under suspension) , HAL 11 Stage HPO. Bangalore - 560008 ( 2 ) Shri M. Kollaiah, Postal Assistant (under suspension ) , HAL II Stage , HPO , Bangalore- 560008 (3 ) Shri K. Gandhi , Postal Assistant, Indira Nagar PostOffice , Bangalore - 560038 ( 4 ) Shri Mahendra P. Jain, R/ o 3998 , Jewellery Street , Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore (5) Shri Narasimha , No. 15/18 , Vivekananda Nagar, Katriguppe Main Road , Banashankri III Stage, Bangalore- 560085 , and unknown others , for their fraudulent acts of illegally getting encashed Kisan Vikas Patras Valued at Rs . 4 lakhs and any other public servants or persons in relation to , or in connection with the said offences , and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

1 [F. No. 228/82/2004- AVD. - IIJ B. RAJAGOPAL NAIDU, Director

S. O. 3027. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorized occupants ) Act 1971 ( 40 of 1971 ) and in supersession of the Notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Tourisın , No. S.O. 3595 dated, the 6th November, 2002 published in the Gazette of India dated, the 16th Noveinber , 2002, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession , the Government of India hereby appoints the officer mentioned in column ( i ) of the table below, being the officer equivalent to the rank of Gazetted Officer of the Government to be the Estate Officer for the purposes of this Act and also defines of the local limit of public premises , as specified in the corresponding entry in column ( 2) of the said table, in respect of which the said Estate Officer shall exercise the powers conferred, and perform duties imposed, on the Estate Officer by or under the said Act.

TABLE

पर्यटन मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2004

Designation of the

Officer

Categories of public premises and local limits of the jurisdiction

(1)

(2)

ment Corporation

Ltd. , 3G Everest

All premises belonging to or taken on lease by India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. and situated in the , States of WestBengal , Bihar , Orissa and Assain .

DeputyGeneral Manager (ATT- Eastern Region ), India TouristDevelop- Building, 46C Jawaharlal Nehru Road,

Kolkata- 700071 .

का०आ ० 3027.-सार्वजनिक परिसर ( अप्राधिकृत दखलकारों की बेदखली) अधिनियम, 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों और दिनांक 16 नवम्बर , 2002 को भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित पर्यटन मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना सं ० का ० आ ० 3595 दिनांक 6 नवम्बर 2002 का अधिक्रमण करते हुए, ऐसे अधिक्रमण से पूर्व किए गए, लोप करने वाले, जैसे को छोड़कर, भारत सरकार इसके द्वारा नीचे की सारणी के स्तंभ ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित अधिकारी को सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के बराबर रैंक के अधिकारी होने के नाते इस अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए संपदा अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्तकरती है और उक्त सारणी के स्तंभ ( 2 ) में तत्स्थानी प्रविष्टि में यथा विनिर्दिष्ट सार्वजनिक परिसर की स्थानीय सीमाओं को भी परिभाषित करती है, जिसमें उक्त संपदा अधिकारी उक्त अधिनियम द्वारा या उसके अधीन संपदा अधिकारों को प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेगा और सौंपे गए कार्यों को करेगा ।

[No. 6/21 /91 -PSU (T) ] RENU JAIN . Under Secy .

8631 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

रेल मंत्रालय

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(रेलवे बोर्ड)

(स्वास्थ्यविभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2004

नई दिल्ली, 14 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 3028.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

का. आ. 3029.-रेल मंत्रालय ( रेलवे बोर्ड) , राजभाषा नियम, 1976 ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) के नियम 10 के उपनियम ( 2 ) और (4 ) के अनुसरण में उत्तर रेलवे के निम्नलिखित रेल कार्यालयों को, जहां 80 % से अधिक अधिकारियों/कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है ।

उत्तर रेलवे

1. उप मुख्य सिगनल एवं दूरसंचार इंजीनियर ( माइक्रोवेव ) , मंडल रेल प्रबंधक कार्यालय , नई दिल्ली ।

कारखाना बिजली इंजीनियर, बिजली वर्कशाप, दयाबस्ती । 2.

उक्तअनुसूची में" राजस्थान विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने, ' मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता ' शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत [ इसके पश्चात् कालम ( 2 ) के रूप में उल्लिखित ' पंजीयन हेतु संक्षिप्त रूप ' [ इसके पश्चात्कालम ( 3 ) के रूप में उल्लिखित ] शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत अन्तिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टिके बाद निम्नलिखित जोड़ा जाएगा, नामत :- (2) (3) एम.सी.एच. ( सी टी एस )

" मजिस्ट्रार चिरूरगिए (कार्डियो थोरेसिस सर्जरी )

3. वरिष्ठ इंजीनियर, बट वैलिंडग प्लांट, मेरठ कैंट ।

4. मुख्य वाणिज्य प्रबंधक यात्री प्रबंधन, आई.आर.सी.ए. बिल्डिंग , नईदिल्ली।

5. जगजीवन राम रेलवे सुरक्षा बल अकादमी, लखनऊ । (यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह एस.एम.एस. , मेडिकल कालेज , जयपुर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में जून, 1998 अथवा इसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो) "

[सं. हिन्दी-2003 /रा.भा . 1/12/3 पार्ट ] [सं० वी० 11015/16/2004 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]

वी. एन. माथुर, सचिव पी.जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (Department of Health)

(RailwayBoard)

New Delhi , the 16th November, 2004

New Delhi , the 14th October , 2004 S. O. 3028. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (2 ) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) , the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

S. O. 3029.-Ministry of Railways (Railway Board), in pursuance of Sub -rules (2) and (4) of Rule 100 of the Official Language Rules , 1976 (use for the official purposes of the Union ) hereby , notify the following Offices of Northern Railway, where 80% or more Officers /Employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :-

Northern Railway

1. Dy. Chief Signal and Telecommunications Engineer (Microwave) , DRM Office , New Delhi.

In the said Schedule against the " Rajasthan University " , under the heading " Recognised Medical Qualification " (hereinafter referred to as column (2 ) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading Abbreviation for Registration ' ( hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

2. Workshop Electrical Engineer, Electrical Workshop. Dayabasti .

3. Senior Engineer , But Welding Plant . Meerut Cantt .

"Magistrar Chirurgiae (Cardio- Thoracic Surgery)

4. ChiefCommercial Manager/PM/IRCA Building, New Delhi .

5. Jagjivan Ram R.P.F. Academy , Lucknow .

(2) (3) M. Ch. (CTS) (This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted in or after June , 1998 in respect of Students trained at S.M.S. Medical College , Jaipur) " .

[No. Hindi -2003 /O.L . 1 / 12/3/Part ] V. N. MATHUR . Secy.

[No.V. 11015 /16/2004 -ME (Policy - 1) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.

8632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC, 3 (ii )]

कोयला और खान मंत्रालय

(कोयला विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 19 नवम्बर, 2004

1 का. आ. 3030.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन एवं विकास) अधिनियम, 1957 (1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 7 की उप धारा ( 1) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 344 तारीख 5 फरवरी, 2004 जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II खण्ड 3, उप खण्ड (ii ) तारीख 14 फरवरी , 2004 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 256.04 हेक्टर (लगभग ) है के अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ;

और उक्त अधिसूचना में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि के अर्जन पर अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अधीन कोई आपत्ति नहीं की गई हैं

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार का झारखण्ड सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि नीचे अनुसूची में वर्णित 256.004 हेक्टर (लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि अर्जित की जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित 256.04 हेक्टर (लगभग) माप वाली भूमि अर्जित की जाती है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. ई.सी.एल./हुरा/मौजा/ 06 तारीख 16 फरवरी , 2004 का उप आयुक्त, जिला गोड्डा (झारखण्ड) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता 700001 के कार्यालय में या निदेशक तकनीकी (प्लानिंग एण्ड प्रोजेक्ट्स) , ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लि. सेंकटोरिया , डाकघर दिसेरगढ़ , जिला बर्दमान (प. बगांल) पिन कोड सं0 713333 के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है । 8633

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

हुरा- ' सी'- प्रोजेक्ट ( राजमहल क्षेत्र)

जिला - गौड़ा (झारखण्ड)

टिप्पणियां

जिला

थाना

थाना सं०

मौजा/ग्राम का नाम

क्रम सं०

क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर ) (लगभग)

8.27

भाग 713

महागामा

गोड्डा

1. रबियाडीह

भाग

14.91

714

महागामा

गोड्डा

2. रक्षाकिट्टा

भाग

165.67

गोड्डा

3. डुमरिया

बी.डब्लू. -सिमरा- II

भाग

6.32

गोड्डा

4. हारकट्टा

बी.डब्लू. -सिमरा- II

भाग

60.87

गोड्डा

पंचरूखी

बी.डब्लू. - सिमरा - II

256.04

कुलक्षेत्र -

कुलक्षेत्र -256.04 हैक्टेयर

मौजा - रबियाडीह संख्या 713 में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या

185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204, 205 , 206, 207 , 208 , 209, 210 , 211 , 212, 213 , 214, 215, 216, 217 , 218, 219, 220, 221 , 222, 223 , 224, 225 , 226 , 227, 228 , 229, 230 , 231 , 232, 233, 234, 235

मौजा - रक्षाकिट्टा संख्या - 714 में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या

180,

197,

215,

232 , 164, 165 , 166, 167, 168 , 169 , 170, 171 , 172, 173, 174, 175, 176 , 177, 178, 179, 181, 182, 183 , 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 198 , 200 , 201 , 202, 203 , 204, 205 , 206, 207, 208, 209 , 210, 211 , 212, 213, 214, 216, 217 , 218 , 219, 220 , 221 , 222, 223 , 224, 225, 226 , 227, 228 , 229, 230 , 231 , 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 240 (भाग).

मौजा - डुमरिया संख्या 1 में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या

27, 28 , 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5 , 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33 , 34 , 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45, 45/1228, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 , 52, 53 , 54, 54/1229 , 55 , 56 , 57, 58, 64 (भाग) , 65, 66, 67, 68 , 69, 70, 71 , 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81 , 82, 83 , 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 , 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 , 102 , 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 , 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115 , 116 (भाग), 116/1230, 116/1231 , 117, 103,

119, 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125 , 126, 127, 135 (भाग) , 171 , 172, 174, 175 , 176 , 177, 178, 179 , 118,

197, 198 , 199, 200 , 201 , 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208 , 209, 210 , 211 , 212, 213, 214, 215, 196,

216, 217, 218, 219 , 220 , 221 , 222, 223 , 224, 225, 226, 227 , 228, 229, 230, 231 , 232 , 233, 234, 235 , 237, 238 , 239, 240 , 241 , 242, 243 , 244, 245, 246, 247, 248 , 249, 250, 251 , 252, 253, 254, 255 , 236,

257, 258 , 259, 260 , 261 , 262, 263 , 264, 265 , 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 , 271 , 272, 273 , 274, 275, 256,

276 , 277 , 278 , 279, 280, 281 , 282 , 283, 284, 285, 286 , 287 , 288, 289 , 290 , 291 , 292, 293 , 294, 295, 8634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 296, 297 , 298 , 299 , 300, 301 , 302 , 303 , 304, 305, 306 , 307, 308 , 309, 310, 311 , 312, 313 , 314, 315 ,

316, 317, 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326, 327, 328 , 329, 330 , 331 , 332, 333 , 334, 335,

336, 337, 338 , 339, 340, 341 , 342, 343 , 344, 345, 346, 347, 348 , 349, 350, 351 , 352, 353 , 354, 355,

356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361 , 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371 , 372, 373 , 374, 375,

376, 377, 378 , 379, 380, 381 , 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390 , 391 , 392, 393 , 394, 395,

396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401 , 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411 , 412, 413, 414, 415,

416, 417, 418 , 419, 420, 421 , 421/1235, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 429/1236, 430, 431 ,

432, 433 , 434, 435, 436, 437 , 438, 439, 440, 441 , 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451 ,

452, 453, 454, 455, 458 , 459, 460 , 461 , 462, 463, 464, 481 (भाग) , 482 (भाग) , 489 (भाग) , 492, 493, 494,

495, 496, 497 , 498, 499 , 500, 501 , 502, 503 , 504, 505 , 506, 507, 508, 509, 510 , 511 , 512, 513, 514,

515, 516, 517, 518 , 519 , 520, 521 , 522, 523 , 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531 , 532, 533, 534,

535, 536, 537 , 538, 539, 540, 541 , 542, 543 , 543/1238, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551 , 552,

553, 554, 555, 556 , 557 , 558, 559, 560 , 561 , 562, 563 , 564, 565 , 566, 567, 568, 569 , 570, 571 , 572,

573, 574, 575, 576, 577, 578 , 579, 580, 581 , 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589, 590, 591 , 592,

593, 594, 595 (भाग ) , 595/1294.732(भाग ) , 879, 880, 880/1239, 881 , 882, 883, 884, 885, 886, 890,

891, 892, 893, 894, 895, 896, 897, 898 , 899, 900 , 901 , 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907, 908,

909, 910, 911 , 912 , 913 , 914, 915 , 916, 917, 918, 919 , 920, 921 , 922, 923, 924, 925, 926,

927, 928 , 929 , 930, 931 , 932, 933 , 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940, 996(भाग ) , 1007, 1008 ,

1009, 1010 , 1011, 1012, 1014 (भाग) , 1015 (भाग) , 1016 (भाग) , 1017 (भाग ) , 1040(भाग ) , 1041 (भाग) ,

1042, 1043 , 1044, 1045 , 1046 , 1047, 1048 , 1049 , 1050 , 1051 , 1052, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1057 ,

L 1058 , 1059 , 1060 , 1061 , 1062, 1063 , 1064, 1065 , 1066, 1067 , 1068 , 1069, 1070 , 1071 , 1072,

1073, 1074 , 1075 , 1076 , 1077 , 1078 , 1079 , 1080, 1081 , 1082, 1083, 1084, 1085, 1086 , 1087,

1 1088 , 1089 , 1090 , 1091 , 1092, 1093 , 1094, 1095, 1096 , 1097, 1098 , 1099, 1100, 1101 , 1102 ,

1103, 1104, 1105 , 1106 , 1107 , 1108 , 1109, 1110 , 1111 , 1112 , 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117,

1118, 1119, 1120, 1121 , 1122, 1123 , 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128 , 1129, 1130 , 1131 , 1132,

1133 , 1134, 1135 , 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140 , 1141 , 1142, 1143, 1144 , 1145, 1146,

1146/1240 , 1147, 1148 , 1149, 1150, 1151 , 1152, 1153 , 1154, 1155, 1156, 1157, 1158 , 1159 ,

1160 , 1161 , 1162, 1163, 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167, 1168 , 1169, 1170, 1171 , 1172, 1173, 1174,

1175, 1176 , 1177, 1178(भाग ) , 1179, 1180, 1181 , 1182, 1183 , 1184, 1185 , 1186, 1187 , 1188,

1189, 1191 , 1192 , 1193 , 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197, 1198 , 1199, 1200 , 1201 , 1202 , 1203 , 1204,

1205, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1209 , 1210 , 1211 , 1213, 1214, 1215 , 1216, 1217 , 1218, 1219 ,

1221 , 1222 , 1223 , 1224, 1225 , 1226 .

मौजा - हारकट्टा संख्या 4 में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या

1220,

354(भाग) , 496, 497, 498, 499, 500 , 501 , 502, 503 , 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , मौजा पंचरूखी संख्या 14 में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या

1 , 2, 3 , 4, 5, 6, 7 , 8, 9, 10 , 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,

28, 29 , 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 ,

51 ,

50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 , 60, 61 , 62,

74, 75 , 76, 77, 78, 79 , 80 , 81 , 82, 83 , 84, 85, 86 , 87,

98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105, 106, 107 ,

121 ,

117, 118 , 119 , 120 ,

122, 123 , 124, 125, 126,

18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27,

42, 43, 44,

41/342,

45, 46, 47, 48 , 49 ,

63 , 64, 66, 67, 68 , 69,

65,

70, 71 , 72, 73,

88, 89, 90, 91 , 92, 93 , 94, 95, 96, 97,

108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112, 113, 114, 115, 116,

128 , 129, 130 , 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135, 8635 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

मौजा- पाँचरूखी संख्या 14 और पहाड़पुर संख्या 32 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ साथ जाती है और क 10 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क10 -क 11 रेखा मौजा- पाँचरुखी संख्या 14 के प्लाट संख्या 326 के पश्चिमी और दक्षिणी रेखा के साथ जाती है और क-11 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क11 क 12 रेखा मौजा- पाँचरूखी संख्या जाती है और क -12 बिन्दु पर 14 के प्लाट संख्या 282 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ मिलती है ।

क12-क13 रेखा मौजा- पाँचरूखी संख्या 14 के प्लाट संख्या 282 के पूर्वी, उत्तरी एवं पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है और ए -13 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क13-क14 रेखा मौजा- पाँचरुखी संख्या 14 के प्लाट संख्या 282 के उत्तरी पश्चिमी एवं दक्षिणी रेखा के साथ जाती है और क 14 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क14-क15 रेखा मौजा - पाँचरूखी संख्या 14 और डुमरिया संख्या 1 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ जाती है और क 15 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क15-क 16 रेखा मौजा- डुमरिया संख्या 1 की प्लाट संख्या 1178 से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 1178 के पश्चिमी और दक्षिणी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 732 से होकर जाती है मौजा डुमरिया के प्लाट संख्या 1227 के पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है और क-16 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क16-क 17 - क 18 रेखा मौजा डुमरिया संख्या साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या क-18 बिन्दु पर मिलती है । 1 प्लाट संख्या - 1227 के 1227 के दक्षिणी और पश्चिमी दक्षिणी और पूर्वी रेखा के रेखा के साथ जाती है और क18-क 19 रेखा मौजा- डुमरिया संख्या साथ जाती हैं और हाड़कट्टा संख्या 4, प्लाट संख्या 1 और हाड़कट्ट्टा संख्या 4 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के 503 , 505, 509 की पुर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है एवं प्लाट संख्या 510, 511 के पूर्वी और दक्षिणी रेखा के साथ जाती है और क -19 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क19-क20

512, 514, 530, 527, 526, रेखा मौजा- हाड़कट्टा संख्या 4 के प्लाट संख्या 524, 495 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है प्लाट संख्या 354, 353 होकर जाती है और क-20 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क20-क 21 1040, 1041 से होकर जाती है एवं उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट प्लाट संख्या 1056 की पूर्वी और रेखा मौजा - डुमरिया संख्या -1 के प्लाट संख्या प्लाट संख्या 1039, 1038, 1037 , 1033 की संख्या 1032 की पूर्वी रेखा से होकर जाती है, उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 1018 की उत्तरी रेखा से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 1016, 1015, 1014, 996 से होकर जाती हे और 997 के पूर्वी रेखा से होकर जाती है । प्लाट संख्या 1006 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा से होकर जाती है । 3422 GI/04-2 8636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 136, 137 , 138 , 139 , 140, 142, 143, 144, 145 , 146, 147, 148, 149, 150 , 151 , 152, 153, 154 , 155, 156, 157, 158, 159 , 160 , 161 , 162, 163, 164 , 165, 166 , 167, 168 , 169, 170 , 171 , 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180 , 181 , 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190 , 191, 192, 193 , 194, 195, 196, 197 , 198, 199, 200 , 201 , 202, 203 , 204, 205, 206, 207, 208 , 209, 210 , 211 , 212, 213 , 214, 215, 216 , 217, 218 , 219 , 220, 221 , 222, 223 , 224, 225, 226, 227, 228 , 229, 230 , 231 , 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 , 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 250 , 251 , 252, 253, 254, 255, 256 , 257, 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262, 263, 264, 265 , 266, 267, 268 , 269, 270, 271 , 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 , 277, 278, 279, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287 , 288 , 292, 293 , 294, 295, 296, 297, 299, 300, 301 , 303 , 304, 305, 307, 308 , 309, 310 , 311 , 312, 313 , 314, 315, 316 , 317, 318, 343 ,

सीमा विवरण

क 1 क2

रेखा प्लाट संख्या 194 मौजा रबियाडीह संख्या 713 के के पश्चिमी और दक्षिणी बिन्दु से आरम्भ होती है और प्लाट संख्या 195 की दक्षिणी रेखा के साथ साथ गुजरती है और क-2बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क2 - क3

रेखा मौजा - तेतारिया संख्या -31 और रबियाडीह संख्या 713 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा से होकर जाती है तथा मौजा तेतारिया संख्या 31 , रबियाडीह संख्या 713 और डुमरिया संख्या - 1 की त्रिसीमा रेखा के क-3 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

1 क3 - क4 रेखा मौजा- तेतारिया संख्या 31 और डुमरिया संख्या -1 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा से होकर जाती है तथा मौजा तेतारिया संख्या 31 , डुमरिया संख्या 1 और पहाड़पुर संख्या - 32 की त्रि सीमा पंक्ति के क-4 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क4 - क 5

रेखा मौजा- पहाड़पुर संख्या 32 और डुमरिया संख्या -1 की संयुक्त सीमा के साथ जाती है और मौजा पहाड़पुर संख्या 32, डुमरिया संख्या 1 और मौजा पहाड़पुर डुमरिया और पाँचरूखी त्रिसीमा रेखा के क -5 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क5 क6 रेखा मौजा- पहाड़पुर संख्या 32 और पाँचरूखी संख्या 14 की संयुक्त सीमा के साथ जाती है और क-6 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क6-क7-क8 रेखा मौजा- पाँचरूखी संख्या 14 प्लाट संख्या 127 , 141 , 249 की पश्चिमी दक्षिणी और पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है और मौजा पाँचरूखी संख्या 14 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ जाती है तथा मौजा पाँचरूखी संख्या 14 और पहाड़पुर संख्या 32 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ जाती है, मौजा पाँचरूखी के प्लाट संख्या 298 की पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है और क-४ बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क8-59 -क10 रेखा मौजा- पाँचरुखी संख्या 14 के प्लाट संख्या 298 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है, और मौजा- पाँचरूखी संख्या 14 के प्लाट सं0 302 की दक्षिणी उत्तरी और पश्चिमी और पहाड़पुर संख्या - 32 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ जाती है । मौजा- पाँचरूखी संख्या 14 के प्लाट संख्या 302 की दक्षिणी उत्तरी और पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है, रेखा प्लॉट संख्या 306 की पश्चिमी दक्षिणी और पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है, 8637 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

प्लाट संख्या - 1005 , 1003 , 1002 , 1001 , 1000, 999 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 732से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 889 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 888, 887, 878 की उत्तरी रेखा से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 611 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा से होकर जाती है और प्लाट संख्या 610 से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 595 से होकर जाती है और क-21 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क21 - क 22 रेखा मौजा- डुमरिया संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 601 , 600 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या - 597, 596 की दक्षिणी रेखा से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 481 , 482, 489 से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 491 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या - 490 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या - 487, 486 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 456, 457 की उत्तरी पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 483 की पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 482, 465, 466 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, मौजा डुमरिया संख्या - 1 और छोटा खडहरा संख्या - 2 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा के साथ जाती है और क-22 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क22-क23

रेखा मौजा - डुमरिया संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 195, 194, 180, 170, 169 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है, और प्लाट संख्या 135 से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 173, 127, 128 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है और क-23 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क23- क 24 रेखा मौजा - डुमरिया संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 128, 129 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 1232 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 116 , 64 , से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 64 की उत्तरी और पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 61 की उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 59 की पूर्वी और उत्तरी रेखा के साथ जाती है और मौजा रक्साकिटा संख्या 714 की संयुक्त सीमा रेखा से होकर जाती है, मौजा रक्साकिटा संख्या 714 की प्लाट संख्या 240 से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 199 की उत्तरी और पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 201 से होकर जाती है, प्लाट संख्या 238 के उत्तरी और पश्चिमी रेखा के साथ जाती है, प्लाट संख्या - 236 , 235 , 234, 231, 230, 229 की दक्षिणी रेखा के साथ जाती है और क-24 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

क24- क 1

रेखा मौजा रक्साकिटा संख्या 714 की प्लाट संख्या 163 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है और रवियाडीह संख्या 713 के संयुक्त सीमा रेखा से होकर जाती है, मौजा - रवियाडीह में प्लाट संख्या 184 की पूर्वी रेखा के साथ जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु क -1 पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. -43015/5/2003- पी.आर.आई. डब्ल्यू. ]

बी. के. पण्डा, निदेशक 8638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

Ministry of Coal and Mines

(Department of Coal) )

New Delhi , the 19th November, 2004

S. O. 3030.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 334 dated the 5th February, 2004 issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section . 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, (20 of 1957) and published in the Gazette of India, under Part II , section 3 , sub- section ( ii ) dated the 14th February, 2004 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire the lands measuring 256.04 hectares (approximately ) of lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification ;

And, whereas , no objection was made under section 8 of the Act to the acquisition of the lands in the locality specified in the said notification;

And, whereas , the Central Government after consulting the Government of Jharkhand is satisfied that, the lands measuring 256.04 hectares (approximately ) of lands described in the Schedule below should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 9 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the lands measuring 256.04 hectares ( approximately) described in the said schedule are hereby acquired.

1 2. The plan bearing number ECL/HURRA/ MOUZA/06 dated 16.04.04 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Dy. Commissioner , District, Godda ( Jharkhand) , or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata -700 001 , or in the office of the Director Technical (Planning & Project), Eastern Coalfields Limited, Sanctoria, Post Office - Dishergarh, Dist. Burdwan ( West Bengal ), Pin Code No. 713 333 .

Schedule

Hurrah ' C ' Project of Rajmahal Area District Godda ( Jharkhand)

Mouza/village

District

Sl . no .

Remarks Thana no .

Police station

Area (Inhectare)

Rabiadih

713 Mahagama Godda 8.27

Part Rakshakitta

714

Godda

Mahagama

14.91

Part 3

Dumaria

BW- Simra - II

Godda 165.67

Part 4

Harkatta

04 BW - Simra - II Godda 6.32

Part 5

Pachrukhi

BW - Simra- II

Godda 60.87

Part

Total: 256.04

Total : 256.04 hectares 8639 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Land Schedule

Hurrah ' C ' Project, Rajmahal Coalfields

Plot numbers (as given below ) to be acquired in mouza Rabiadih No. 713

185 , 186, 187, 188 , 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201 , 202, 203 , 204, 205 , 206, 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212, 213 , 214, 215 , 216, 217, 218 , 219 , 220, 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226, 227 , 228 , 229, 230, 231 , 232, 233 , 234, 235

Plot Nos . (As Given Below ) to be Acquired In Mouza - Raksakitta No. 714

164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171 , 172, 173 , 174, 175, 176, 177 , 178 , 179, 180, 181 , 182 , 183 , 184, 185, 186, 187, 188 , 189, 190, 191, 192, 193 , 194, 195, 196, 197 , 198 , 200 , 201 , 202, 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207, 208 , 209, 210, 211 , 212, 213 , 214, 215 , 216, 217 , 218 , 219, 220, 221 , 222 , 223 , 224, 225 , 226, 227, 228, 229 , 230, 231 , 232, 233 , 234, 235 , 236, 237 , 240(P) .

Plot Nos . (As Given Below ) to be Acquired In Mouza- Dumaria No. 1

1 , 2, 3 , 4 , 5 , 6, 7 , 8 , 9, 10, 11 , 12 , 13 , 14, 15 , 16, 17, 18 , 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36, 37, 38 , 39, 40 , 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45 , 45/1228 , 46 , 47, 48 , 49 , 50, 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 54/1229, 55 , 56, 57 , 58 , 64(P) , 65 , 66, 67, 68 , 69 , 70, 71 , 72, 73 , 74, 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79, 80, 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 , 92, 93 , 94, 95 , 96, 97 , 98 , 99 , 100, 101 , 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113, 114, 115, 116(P), 116/1230 , 116/1231 , 117 , 118 , 119, 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124 , 125 , 126, 127 , 135 (P), 171 , 172, 174, 175 , 176 , 177, 178 , 179, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206, 207 , 208 , 209, 210 , 211 , 212, 213 , 214 , 215 , 216, 217, 218 , 219 , 220, 221 , 222 , 223 , 224, 225 , 226, 227 , 228 , 229, 230, 231 , 232 , 233, 234, 235 , 236 , 237, 238 , 239 , 240, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244, 245 , 246, 247, 248 , 249 , 250, 251 , 252, 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260, 261 , 262, 263 , 264 , 265 , 266, 267, 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274, 275 , 276 , 277, 278 , 279, 280, 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287, 288 , 289, 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302, 303 , 304, 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310, 311 , 312, 313 , 314, 315 , 316 , 317, 318 , 319 , 320, 321 , 322 , 323 , 324, 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329, 330, 331 , 332, 333 , 334, 335, 336, 337 , 338 , 339 , 340, 341 , 342, 343 , 344, 345, 346 , 347 , 348 , 349, 350 , 351 , 352, 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360, 361 , 362 , 363 , 364, 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369, 370, 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382, 383 , 384, 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390, 391 , 392, 393 , 394, 395 , 396, 397, 398 , 399 , 400, 401 , 402, 403 , 404, 405 , 406, 407 , 408 , 409 , 410, 411 , 412 , 413 , 414, 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420, 421 , 421/1235 , 422, 423 , 424 , 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 429/1236, 430, 431 , 432, 433 , 434, 435 , 436, 437 , 438 , 439 , 440, 441 , 442, 443 , 444, 445 , 446, 447 , 448, 449 , 450 , 451 , 452, 453 , 454 , 455 , 458 , 459 , 460, 461 , 462, 463 , 464 , 481 (P), 482 (P ) , 489 (P ) , 492, 493 , 494, 495 , 496, 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502, 503 , 504, 505, 506, 507 , 508 , 509 , 510, 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516, 517, 518 , 519 , 520, 521 , 522 , 523 , 524, 525 , 526, 527, 528 , 529, 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534, 535 , 536, 537 , 538 , 539 , 540, 541 , 542, 8640

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 543 , 543/1238, 544, 545 , 546, 547, 548 , 549, 550 , 551 , 552, 553 , 554, 555, 556, 557, 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564, 565 , 566, 567 , 568 , 569 , 570, 571 , 572, 573 , 574, 575 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582, 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587, 588 , 589, 590, 591 , 592, 593 , 594 , 595 (P ) , 595/1294 . 732(P) , 879, 880, 880/1239 , 881 , 882, 883 , 884 , 885 , 886, 890 , 891 , 892 , 893 , 894, 895, 896, 897, 898 , 899 , 900, 901 , 902, 903 , 904, 905, 906, 907, 908 , 909, 910 , 911 , 912, 913 , 914, 915 , 916, 917, 918 , 919, 920, 921 , 922 , 923 , 924 , 925 , 926, 927, 928 , 929 , 930, 931 , 932, 933 , 934 , 935 , 936, 937, 938 , 939, 940 , 996 (P) , 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011 , 1012, 1014(P), 1015 (P), 1016(P) , 1017(P), 1040(P), 1041 (P) , 1042, 1043 , 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048 , 1049, 1050, 1051 , 1052 , 1053 , 1054, 1055, 1057 , 1058 , 1059, 1060 , 1061 , 1062, 1063 , 1064, 1065 , 1066, 1067, 1068 , 1069 , 1070, 1071 , 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075, 1076, 1077, 1078, 1079, 1080, 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084 , 1085 , 1086 , 1087, 1088 , 1089, 1090, 1091 , 1092, 1093 , 1094 , 1095 , 1096, 1097, 1098, 1099, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108 , 1109, 1110 , 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1118 , 1119, 1120, 1121 , 1122 ,. 1123 , 1124 , 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128 , 1129, 1130, 1131 , 1132, 1133 , 1134, 1135 , 1136, 1137 , 1138 , 1139 , 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144 , 1145, 1146, 1146/1240, 1147, 1148 , 1149, 1150, 1151, 1152, 1153 , 1154, 1155, 1156, 1157, 1158 , 1159, 1160, 1161 , 1162, 1163, 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167, 1168, 1169, 1170, 1171 , 1172, 1173 , 1174, 1175, 1176, 1177, 1178 (P ) , 1179, 1180, 1181 , 1182, 1183 , 1184, 1185, 1186, 1187, 1188 , 1189, 1191 , 1192, 1193 , 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197, 1198 , 1199, 1200, 1201 , 1202, 1203 , 1204 , 1205 , 1206 , 1207, 1208 , 1209 , 1210, 1211 , 1213, 1214, 1215 , 1216, 1217, 1218 , 1219, 1220 , 1221 , 1222 , 1223 , 1224 , 1225 , 1226 .

1 Plot Nos. (As Given Below ) to be Acquired

In Mouza - Harkatta No. 4

1 354(P) , 496, 497 , 498 , 499, 500 , 501 , 502, 503 , 504, 505, 506 , 507, 508 , 509, 510, 511 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 ,

Plot Nos . ( As Given Below) to be Acquired

In Mouza - Pachrukhi No. 14

1 , 2, 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7, 8, 9 , 10, 11 , 12 , 13 , 14, 15 , 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25 , 26 , 27, 28 , 29, 30, 31 , 32 , 33 , 34, 35 , 36, 37, 38 , 39, 40, 41 , 41/342, 42, 43 , 44 , 45, 46 , 47 , 48, 49 , 50, 51 , 52, 53 , 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 , 59, 60, 61 , 62, 63 , 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 , 70, 71 , 72 , 73 , 74, 75 , 76, 77 , 78 , 79 , 80, 81 , 82 , 83 , 84, 85 , 86 , 87, 88 , 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94 , 95 , 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105 , 106, 107 , 108, 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113, 114 , 115 , 116, 117, 118, 119 , 120 , 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125, 126, 128, 129, 130, 131 , 132 , 133 , 134, 135 , 136 , 137,138 , 139 , 140, 142, 143 , 144, 145 , 146, 147, 148 , 149 , 150, 151 , 152 , 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158, 159 , 160 , 161 , 162, 163 , 164, 165 , 166, 167, 168 , 169 , 170, 171 , 172 , 173 , 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181 , 182, 183 , 184, 185 , 186, 187, 188 , 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205, 206, 207, 208 , 209, 210, 211 , 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226, 227, 228 , 229 , 230, 231 , 232, 233 , 234, 235 , 236, 237, 238 , 239, 240, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 250, 251 , 252, 253 , 254, 255 , 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261 , 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274, 275 , 276, 277, 278, 279, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288 , 292, 293 , 294, 295 , 296, 297, 299, 300 , 301 , 303 , 304, 305, 307, 308 , 309, 310, 311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315, 316, 317, 318, 343 , 8641

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Boundary Description:

A1 -A2

Line starts from western & southern point of plot No. 194 and passes along with southern line of plot No. 195 of Mouza - Rabiadih No. 713 and meets point A- 2 as delineated on plan.

A2-A3

Line passes through joint boundary line of Mouza - Tetaria No. 31 Rabiadih No. 713 and meets at Point A- 3 of trio - roundary line of mouza - Tetaria No. 31 , Rabiadih No. 713 and Dumaria No. as delineated on plan.

A3- A4

Line passes through joint boundary line of Mouza - Tetaria No. 31 and Dumaria No. 1 and meets at Point A-4 of trio- boundary line of mouza Tetaria No. 31 , Dumaria No. 1 & Paharpur No. 32 as delineated on plan.

A4-A5

Line passes along with joint boundary line of Mouza - Paharpur No. 32 and Dumaria No. 1 and meets at Point A- 5 of Trio - boundary line of Mouza- Paharpur , Dumaria & Pachrukhi as delineated on plan.

A5-A6

Line passes along with joint boundary line of Mouza - Paharpur No.32 and Pachrukhi No. 14 and meets at point A- 6 as delineated on the plan .

A6-A7 -A8 Line passes along with western southern and eastern line of Mouza Pachrukhi No. 14 plot No. 127, 141 , 249 and passes along with joint boundary line of Mouza - Pachrukhi No. 14 and Paharpur No. 32 and passes along with western line of Plot No. 298 of Mouza Pachrukhi and meets at Point A- 8 as delineated on the plan .

A8- A9 -A10 Line passes along with eastern line of plot No. 298 of Mouza - Pachrukhi No. 14 and passes along with southern northern & western line of plot No. 302 of Mouza Pachrukhi No.14 , line passes along with western, southern and eastern line of plot No. 306 passes along with joint boundary of Mouza - Pachrukhi No. 14 and Paharpur No. 32 and meets at Point A- 10 as delineated onthe plan.

A10-A11 Line passes along with western and southern line of plot No. 326 of Mouza Pachrukhi No. 14 and meets at Point at A- 11 as delineated on the plan.

A11 -A12 Line passes along with northern line of plot No. 282 of Mouza - Pachrukhi No. 14 and meets at Point at A - 12 as delineated on the plan.

A12- A13 Line passes along with eastern , northern & western line of plot No. 282 of Mouza Pachrukhi No. 14 and meets at Point at A- 13 as delineated on the plan.

A13-A14 Line passes along with northern, western and southern line of plot No. 282 of Mouza - Pachrukhi No. 14 meets at Point at A - 14 as delineated on the plan .

A14-A15 Line passes along with the joint boundary line of Mouza - Pachrukhi No. 14 & Dumaria No. 1 and meets at Point at A- 15 as delineated on the plan .

8642

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] A15 -A16- Line passes through Plot No. 1178 of Mouza - Dumaria No. 1 , passes along with western and southern line of plot No. 1178, passes through Plot No. 732 passes along with western line of Plot No. 1227 of Mouza - Dumaria No. 1 and meets at Point at A- 16 as delineated on the plan.

A16- A17 - A18 Line passes along with southern and eastern line of plot No. 1227 of Mouza Dumaria No. 1 passes along with the southern and western line of plot No. 1227 and meets at point A- 18 as delineated on the plan .

A18-A19 Line passes along with the joint boundary line of Mouza - Dumaria No. 1 and Mouza- Harkatta No. 4 passes along with eastern line of Plot No. 503 , 505, 509 of Mouza -- Harkatta No. 4 passes along with eastern and southern line of plot No. 510, 511 and meets at point at A- 19 as delineated on the plan.

A19 -A20 Line passes along with northern line of plot No. 512, 514, 530, 527, 526, 524 , 495 of Mouza - Harkatta No. 4 and passes through Plot No. 354, 353 and meets at Point A- 20 as delineated on the plan.

1 A20 -A21 Line passes through Plot No. 1040, 1041 of Mouza- Dumaria No.1 , passes along with northern line of plot No. 1039, 1038, 1037, 1033 passes through eastern line ofPlot No. 1032, passes along with eastern and northern line of Plot No. 1056, passes through northern line of plot No. 1018 , passes through Plot No. 1016, 1015 , 1014, 996, passes through eastern line of Plot No. 997, passes through eastern and northern line of Plot No. 1006 , passes along with northern line of Plot No. 1005 , 1003, 1002, 1001 , 1000, 999 , passes through Plot No. 732, passes along with eastern and northern line of plot No. 889, passes through northern line of Plot No. 888, 887, 878, passes through eastern and northern line of plot No. 611 , passes through plot No. 610, passes through plot No. 595 and meets at point at A- 21 as delineated on the plan.

A21 -A22 Line passes along with eastern line of plot No. 601 , 600 of Mouza - Dumaria No. 1 , passes through southern line of Plot No. 597, 596, passes through plot No. 481 , 482, 489, passes along with eastern line of plot No. 491 , passes along with eastern and northern line of plot No. 490, passes along with northern line of plot No. 487 , 486 , passes along with northern and western line of plot No. 456, 457, passes along with western line of Plot No. 483 , passes along with northern line of plot No. 482, 465, 466, passes along with joint boundary line of Mouza Dumaria No. 1 and Chota Khadhara No. 2 and meets at point at A- 22 as delineated on the plan.

A22 - A23 Line passes along with eastern line of 195 , 194, 180, 170, 169 of Mouza Dumaria No.1 , passes through Plot No. 135, passes along with eastern line of plot No. 173, 127 , 128 and meets at point at A -23 as delineated on the plan.

A23 - A24 Line passes along with northern line of Plot No. 128, 129, passes along with eastern and northern line of plot No. 1232, passes through plot No. 116, 64, passes along with northern and western line of plot No. 64, passes along with 8643 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

northern line of plot No. 61 , passes along with eastern and northern line of plot No. 59 , passes along with Joint boundary line of Mouza - Dumaria No. 1 and Raksakitta No. 714 , passes through Plot No. 240 of Mouza Raksakitta No. 714, passes along with northern and western line of plot No. 199, passes through plot No. 201 , passes along with northern and western line of plot No. 238 , passes through southern line of Plot No. 236, 235 , 234 , 231 , 230, 229 and meets at point at A-24 as delineated on the plan.

A24 -A1

Line passes along with eastern line of plot No. 163 of Mouza Raksakitta No. 714 and passes through joint boundary line of Mouza Raksakitta No. 714 and Rabiadih No. 713 , passes through eastern line of Plot No. 184 of Mouza- Rabiadih No. 713 and meets at starting point at A - 1 as delineated on the plan .

[No. 43015/5/2003-P.R.I.W. ] B. K. PANDA , Director पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3031.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1836 तारीख 1 जुलाई, 2003 , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इण्डस्ट्रीज कम्पनी लिमिटेड के गोवा में उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश में संरचनाओ से आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य में नलगोडा जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ। स्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियों जनता को तारीख 21 जुलाई, 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में , जनता की और से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात , और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ; अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त , गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ। क्स्ट्रचर कम्पनी लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

3422G1/04-3 8644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

अनुसूची

जिल्ला: नलगोंडा मंडल: चिव्वेमला

गांव का नाम

सर्वे सं . /सब डिविजन सं.

106 1) बीवागूडेम्

राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

आर आओयूआजत करन कीलए

त्रफल

हेक्टर

सिएर

एर 4-

৯ 0

सर्वे में 41 और 14 के बीच में

6 Total

301 2) चिव्वेमला

302

318

319

320

328

332

333

334 CL

334Part

442

443

444

445

446

447

449

450

454

455

456

456Part

463

470

472

555

557

565

566

569

570

572

573

590

591

592

596

597 CL

सर्वे में 456 और 463 के बीच में

सर्वे से 472 और 597 के बीच में

Total

40 CL

90 8645 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

100

3) कुडकुडा

101

106

108

137

139

139Part

151

151 Part

214

225

227

228

241

243

244

247

247 Part

248

249

266

267

279

287

288

289

290

83Part

77 Total

103

4)तिम्मापुरम्

106

107

133

133Part

134

134Part

168

169

173

176

178 8646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 4)तिम्मापुरम्(निरंतर)

246

247

249

262

276

277

278

279

280

281

283

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 3

5 0

90 0

55 0

75 0

20 0

30 0

85 0

95 0

40 0

80 0

15 0

35 0

25 0

20 0

00 0

20 0

सर्वे सं 249 और 247 का बीच में

सर्वे सं 56 और 67 का बीच में

सर्वे सं 178 और 262 का बीच में

Total

31 5) वट्टिखम्ममपाहाड

641

643

644

648

650

652

653

654 0

05 9

45 0

90 0

20 0

05 0

55 0

45 0

90 0

75 0

गॉव सीमा और 643 का बीच में

Total

9 मंडल: केतेपाल्लि

10 3

जिल्ला: नलगोंडा

1) गुडिवाडा

115

116

148

149

150

154

155

156

163

164

168

169

269

270

272

राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश 0

40 0

20 0

05 0

55 0

60 0

95 0

10 1

35 0

25 0

00 0

75 0

05 0

10 0

90 0

55 0

05 0

40 0

50 0

90 0

50 8647 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1) गुडिवाडा (निरंतर)

सर्वे सं 64 और 168 का बीच में

Total

134

2)काासनगूडझा

156

160

161

162

168

169

175

176

178

178Part

180

187

188

190

233

गॉव सीमा और 156 का बीच में

Total

राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

जिल्ला: नलगोंडा

मंडल : मोते

149

1)नामावरम्

150

151

152

155/11

219

220

221

222

223

227

228

233

234

236

237

240

545

548

549

550

551

552

553

554

555

568

569

570

570Part 8648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

571 1) नामावरम् (निरंतर)

721

722

724

726

729

731

738

739

744

750

752

768

770

771

773

779

780

870 Total

49 मंडल: मुनगाला

जिल्ला : नलगोंडा 1) कलकोवा

171

173

174

175

177

178

179

181

182/1

182/2

183/4

184

190

191/3

193

194

195

247/1

248/2

251/1

251/2

251/6

251/7

252/3

252/4

252/5

252/6

253/1

253/2

253/3

254/2

255/1

256/2

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

1 0

85 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

260/1 1) कलकोवा (निरंतर)

260/2

261/1

261/2

261/3

261/4

261/5

269/1

269/2

269/3

43 Total

12/1 2) मुनगाला

12/2

121/1

122/1

122/2

125

126/2

127/1

127/3

127/4

128

16/1

17/2

17/3

20/1

20/2

23/1

23/2

23/3

24/2

24/3

25/1

25/2

26/3

77/1

77/2

77/3

77/4

81/1

81/2

35 Total

1014/1 3) रेपाला

1014/2

1015/2

1017/2

1017/3

1018

1022/4

8649

60 0

0 8650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 200X04/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

1023/3 3) रेपाला (निरंतर)

1027/2

1028

1029

1030

1031/1

1031/2

PART 11- SEC . 3( ii ) ] 3

5 0

10 0

05 0

55 0

20 0

80 0

45 0

1050/1

1050/2

1051

1052/1

1052/2 0

15 0

10 CL

80 CL

1052/5

1053/1

1070/1

1071/1

660/1

661.

663/2

663/3

663/5

663/6

663/7

663/8

667

668

669/2

669/3

670

671/1

708

709/1

709/2

710/4

717/1

717/2

717/3

717/4

718/1

720

721

723

966/1

966/6

967

972/2

972/3

973/2

976/1

976/3

977/3

984/1

984/4

984/5 0

55 0

75 0

40 0

25 CL

20 0

45 0

10 0

05 0

55 0

40 0

05 0

10 0

85 0

30 0

40 CL

25 CL

40 CL

75 CL

35 0

10 CL

45 0

90 0

35 0

40 CL

45 0

40 0

20 0

60 0

65 0

50 CL

70 0

30 0

60 0

50 0

35 CL

75 0

70 0

95 0

15 0

35 0

05 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

2 3)रपाला (निरंतर)

984/6

985/1

989/1

989/2

989/3

990 Total

67 मंडल : सूर्यापेट

8651 3

5 0

40 0

45 0

35 0

05 0

15 14

जिल्ला: नलगोंडा

1) पिल्ललमत्रि

299

307

327

327Part

328

332

334

338

339

349

356

357

358

362

363

363Part

374

375

380

387

388

389

390 Total

23 2) पिन्नय्यापालेम्

151

157

158

161

162

168

169

333

334

335

336

340

341

सर्वे सं 1 और 341 का बीच में

सर्वे सं 151 और 4 का बीच में Total

19 3422 G1/044

राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश 0

25 0

10 0

30 0

50 1

30 0

50 0

20 0

10 0

65 0

55 0

25 0

75 0

20 0

25 0

65 0

00 0

10 0

25 0

95 8

05 0

55 0

45 0

95 0

40 0

55 0

45 0

60 0

00 0

95 0

20 0

65 0

45 0

20 CL

15 CL

95 8652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 1

50 3) रामन्नागूडेम्

10 Total

10 4) वकटगमापुरम्

11 Part

78Part

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

सर्वे से 59 और 78 का बीच में

16 Total

357 5) यंड्लापल्लि

359

573

576

577

589

593

597

598

599

604

605

614 CL

1 0

गॉव सीमा और 604 का बीच में

Total

[फा. सं. एल-14014/25/2003- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल , अवर सचिव

Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 16th November, 2004

S. O. 3031.-Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1836 , dated the 1st July, 2003 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ) ( 50 of 1962 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of natural gas from exploration blocks in the Northern/Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited, 8653 भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

the promoter company of M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limitedto various consumers of District Nalgonda in the State of Andhra Pradesh by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 21st July, 2003;

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;

And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying pipeline, has decided to acquire the right ofuser therein ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired , for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on this date of publication of the declaration, in Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

Mandal : Chivemla

Area tothe crequnid for ROU

C-Are

Are

Survey No./Sub-Division No.

Hectare

Village

106

1)Bibigudem

In between Sy.No. 41 & 14

Total

301

2)Chivemla

302

318

319

320

328

332

333

334

334Part

442

443

444 8654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

445 2) Chivemla Conid.

446

447

449

450

454

455

456

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

16Part

463

470

472

555

557

565

566

569

570

572

573

590

591

592

596

597 CL

In Between Sy.No.456&463

InBetween Sy.No.472&597

Total

40 3) Kudkuda

100

101

106

108

137

139

1 14

139Part

151 CL

151Part

214

225

227

228

241

243

244

247

247 Part

248

249

266

267

279

287

288 CL

00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8655

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

289

29 3) Kidkuda(Conld.)

290

83Part

30 Total

103

45 4) Timmapuram

106

107

133

133Part

134

134Part

168

169

173

176

178

246

247

249

262

276

277

278

279

280

281

283

In Between Sy.No.249& 247

InBetween Sy. No.56&107

In Between Sy. No. 178& 262

Total

45 8656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

641 5) Vattikhammapahad

643

644

648

650

652

653

654

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

In Between Vill . Boun . & 643

9 Total

State: Andhra Pradesh

District : Nalgonda

Mandal : Kethepalli

115 1)Gudivada

116

148

149

150

154

155

156

163

164

168

169

269

270

272

98 0

19.

InBetween Sy . No. 164 &168

26 Total

134 2) Kasanguda

156

160

161

162

168

169

175

176

178

178Part

180

187

188

190

233

in Between Vill . Boun . & 156

17 Total

8 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

District : Nalgonda Mandal : Mothey

149 1)Namavaram

150

151

152

155/11

219

220

221

222

223

227

228

233

234

236

237

240

545

548

549

550

551

552

553

554

555

568

569

570

570Part

571

721

722

724

726

729

731

738

739

744

750

752

768

770

771

773

779

780

870

49 Total

8657

5 State: Andhra Pradesh 0

40 0

30 0

10 0

25 0

35 0

80 0

60 0

00 0

75 0

55 0

25 0

10 0

60 0

10 0

75 0

60 0

55 0

90 CL

95 0

45 0

35 0

95 1

65 0

00 0

20 0

90 0

20 0

50 0

10 0

65 0

25 16 8658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 Mandal : Munagala

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

District : Nalgonda

171 1) Kalakova

173

174

175

177

178

179

181

182/1

182/2

183/4

184

190

191/3

193

194

195

247/1

248/2

251/1

251/2

251/6

251/7

252/3

252/4

252/5

252/6

253/1

253/2

253/3

254/2

255/1

256/2

260/1

260/2

261/1

261/2

261/3

261/4

261/5

269/1

269/2

269/3 Total

12/1 2)Munagala

12/2

121/1

122/1

122/2

125

126/2

127/1 State: Andhra Pradesh

1 0

30 भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

127/3

127/4 2)Munagala Confd.

128

16/1

17/2

17/3

20/1

20/2

23/1

23/2

23/3

24/2

24/3

25/1

25/2

26/3

77/1

77/2

77/3

77/4

81/1

81/2

35 Total

1014/1 3)Repala

1014/2

1015/2

1017/2

1017/3

1018

1022/4

1023/3

1027/2

1028

1029

1030

1031/1

1031/2

1050/1

1050/2

1051

1052/1

1052/2

1052/5

1053/1

1070/1

1071/1

660/1

661 3422 G1/04-5

8659

5 3

0 8660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

663/2 3) Repala ( Contd.... )

663/3

663/5

663/6

663/7

663/8

667

668

669/2

669/3

670

671/1

708

709/1

709/2

710/4

717/1

717/2

717/3

717/4

718/1

720

721

723

966/1

966/6

967

972/2

972/3

973/2

976/1

976/3

977/3

984/1

984/4

984/5

984/6

985/1

989/1

989/2

989/3

990 Total

67 Mandal : Suryapeta

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )]

1 0

District : Nalgonda

1) Pillalamarry

299

307

327

327Part

328

332

334

338

339

349 State : Andhra Pradesh

65 8661 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

356

357

1) Pillalamarry (Contd.)

358

362

363

363Part

374

375

380

387

388

389

390

Total

2) Pinnaipalem

151

157

158

161

162

168

169

333

334

335

336

340

341

InBetween Sy.No. 1 &341 In Between Sy. No. 151 &4

Total

3) Ramannagudem

Total

4) Venkataramapuram

11 Part

57 8662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

5 4) Venkataraтарилат

(comited.)

78Part

InBetween Sy. No. 59 & 78

90 Total

357

5) Yendlapalli

359

573

576

577

589

593

597

598

599

604

605

614

Between 604& Vg . Boundary

Total

[F. No. L -14014/25/2003-G.P. ]

S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2004

का. आ. 3032- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए जामनगर - भोपाल और काकीनाडा - हैदराबाद - गोवा पाइपलाइन को आपस में जोडने के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ । स्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपजाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमिं में उपयोग के अधिधकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम् 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिधसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के सम्बन्ध में श्री ए. के. संघवी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जी. टी.आई. सी. एल. पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना, तीसरी मंजिल , एटलांटा टावर, इन्कलाब सोसायटी के सामने गुलगबाई टेकरा , एलिसब्रिज लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । अहमदाबाद 380006 , गुजरात राज्य को 8663

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची राज्य: गुजरात

जिल्ला: नवसारी

तहसील: गणदेवि

आर ओर अजित करने केोनित क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर / ब्लोक नं

गांव का नाम

2 1

1578 1 उंडाच

1579

1585

1584

1583

1590

1588

1589

नाला

1627

1594

1601

1600

नाला

1681

1684

1683

1689

1697

1698

1740

1741

1743

1744

1802

1799

1801

1800

1793

1795

1794

कच्चा रास्ता

चो.मी

आरे

हेकटर

0 8664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

1782 निरंतर उंडाच

नदी

1087 2नांदरखा

1090

1086

1085

1093

1094

1095

1096

1097

1099

1098

1101

1075

1017

1071

1072

1070

1063

1064

1069

1019

1068

1067

1032

1046

1045

1044

1034

1035

1036

808

नहर

रास्ता

803

3केसली

400

393

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii)]

A 0

1 0

77 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

392

निरंतर केसली

रास्ता

339

340

345

346

347

348

351

354

352

353

नाला

4 अंभेटा

1257

1256

1258

1261

1260

1262

1263

कच्चा रास्ता

1274

1269

1273

1272

1271

रास्ता ( ओ.डी.आर )

1371

1370

1369

1368

1367

1366

कच्चा रास्ता

1364

1363

1362

8665

94 33

74 12

59 0

52 0

0 8666

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926

2 निरंतर अंभेटा

नहर

1423

1424

नहर

रास्ता

1425

1427

1428

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

75और 81 के वीच

राज्य धोरीमागें

कच्चा रास्ता

186

183

184

198

200

200 और 208 के वीच

208

207

206

नाला

5 देसाड

नाला

241

242

कच्चा रास्ता

243

रास्ता ( ओ.डी.आर)

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

निरंतर देसाड

रेल्वेलाइन

वेगनीया नदी

वेगनीया नदी 6खेरगाम

कच्चा रास्ता

*31

नहर

कच्चा रास्ता 7 वडसांगल

142

नहर

143

120 8 दुवाडा

डामर रास्ता

186

नहर

कच्चा रास्ता

187

800 9घनारी

798

796

795

794

नहर

807

793

812

813

818 3422 GI/04-6

8667

36 26

1-1

0 8668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

819 निरंतर घनारी

817

820

676

675

674

673

828

नहर

829

672

671

523

680

681

नाला

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

नाला और डामर रास्ता के बीच

डामर रास्ता

654

653

712

648

652

651

650

649

डामर रास्ता

636

630

631

632

नाला

575

576

नाला 10 पीपलधरा

नाला

551

रास्ता 0

15 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

550

निरंतर पीपलधरा

549

546

548

547

542

540

नाला

511

481

488

482

483

478

485

474

468

469

470

466

406

405

402

404

401

400

341

342

336

337

321

323

324

312

306

311

309

310

283

8669

94 28

83 11

53 10

0 8670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27,2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

कच्चा रास्ता निरंतर पीपलधरा

282

281

280

275

274

279

276

277

278

287

नदी

11 वेगाम

नदी

1035

1036

1043

नाला

1042

1045

नाला

1044

1046

1047

1022

1023

डामर रास्ता

974

1021

1020

कच्चा रास्ता

नहर

1017

1016

1015

1008

1009

नहर

1006

PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 3

32 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8671

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

1005 निरंतर वेगाम

934

945

943

944

नाला

तहसील: चीखली

69 0

96 0

जिल्ला: नवसारी

1 वंकाल

नदी

1855

1852

1854

1858

1859

1860

1861

1862

1863

1864

1828

1827

1826

1810

1811

1809

1802

1803

1801

1800

1799

1798

1797

1796

1795

1792

1793

1790

1713

1712

कच्चा रास्ता राज्य: गुजरात

24 [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

8672

2 1

1711

निरंतर वंकाल

1645

1709

1706

1697

1696

1698

1699

1694

1693

1692

नाला

1014

1034

1035

1033

1029

1028

1027

1025

1037

1038

1042

1024

1043

1045

1041

1044

1060

1059

1061

1067

1066

1065

1063

1064

725

723

722 4

80 0

81 12

22 0

98 0

64 0

20 0

39 0

0 8673

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

728

निरंतर वंकाल

724

724और 711 के वीच

711

716

717

713

712

710

709

708

706

707

डामर रास्ता

642

नहर

645

620

नहर

डामर रास्ता

647

648

649

650

651

तहसील: नवसारी

जिल्ला: नवसारी

नहर

1 खडसुपा

950

डामर रास्ता

955

957

956

954

953

852

नहर

853

859

राज्य: गुजरात

49 8674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 1

860

निरंतर खडसुपा

861

840

864

839

820

821

819

कच्चा रास्ता

810

नहर

803

802

797

795

796

782

778

768

770

766

769

765

764

नहर

763

762

761

744

743

742

739

740

737

735

736

695

694

693

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] 4

22.

0 .

0 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8675

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

692

निरंतर खडसुपा

कच्चा रास्ता

533

534

689

687

684

683

676

678

677

नाला

675

घेोरीमागें 8

674

375

2 अश्टगाम

373

नहर

372

383

371

डामर रास्ता

384

386

386 और 387 के वीच

387

387 और 390 के वीच

390

391

394

237

3 उन

नाला

192

191

190

184

185

477

4 मुनसाड

3422 GI/04--7

20 8676

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

478

निरंतर मुनसाड

479

480

481

482

487

कच्चा रास्ता

488

489

490

कच्चा रास्ता

512

511

510

राज्य धारीमाग

नहर

353

354

355

356

379

371

376

372

378

374

375

375 और 387 के वीच

387

388

276

278

272

274

273

252

कच्चा रास्ता

251

250

13 8677

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

247

निरंतर मुनसाड

248

246

रास्ता ( आओ.डी.आर)

149

187

188

186

183

184

179

178

177

175

नहर

1043

नहर

1037

1036

1035

1038

1034

437

5 दंडेश्वर

438

436

440

444

447

446

456

गम्ता

455

67 11

46 0

19 17

62 23

12 40

27 0

90 0

12 0

0 8678

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

450

निरंतर दंडेश्वर

नाला

487

149

6 भटटाइ

142

259

7ओनची

250

251

247

246

245

राज्यधोरीमार्गे

218

213

215

214

143

216

135

137

138

139

डामर रास्ता

286

8मालधरा

345

कच्चा रास्ता

346

344

343

342

341

360

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

20.

> 0

94 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

370

निरंतरमोलधरा

368

369

367

361

366

365

363

364

450

378

379

451

नाला

449

460

461

465

464

कच्चा रास्ता

548

547

555

556

557

565

564

566

563

कच्चा रास्ता

590

591

592

593

595

596

597

599

नदी

8679 3

85 8680

PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

2 1

9 आमडपोर

नदी

568

569

570

571

572

573

575

576

577

578

579

कच्चा रास्ता

537

536

535

534

533

कच्चा रास्ता

473

सरकारी जमीन

492

474

491

490.

489

483

481

482

242

241

240

244

239

237

236

णहर

173

घेोरीमागें 8 3

11.

12 8681

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

णहर निरंतर आमडपोर

175

161

160

159

158

नहर

80 0

91 0

38 0

रास्ता ( ओम.डी.आर)

10 पडघा

594

593

596

नहर

598

कच्चा रास्ता

602

599

558

557

556

555

डामर रास्ता

डामर रास्ता 11 वेजलपार

फील्ड चेनल

डामर रास्ता

100

101

नाला

116

117

120

118

121

122

नाला 28

34 0

89 0

47 0

27 0

16 0

40 0

98 0

84 0

85 0

18 0

89 0

15 0

1 0 8682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

151

निरंतर वेजलपार

150

149

148

फील्ड चेनल

147

146

नहर

12परथाण

नहर

फील्ड चेनल

कच्चा गम्ता

फील्ड चेनल

251

13. धामन

249

248

नहसीन: जलालपार

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 3

जिल्ला: नवसारी

1मीमलक

फील्ड चेनल

442

441

443

444

459

राज्य: गुजरात

21.

20 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004 /अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

कच्चा रास्ता निरंतर सीमलक

129

2डाभेल

133

130

128

131

132

नहर

118

117

116

कच्चा रास्ता

नहर

148

105

151

152

153

154

155

158

157

159

160

183

नहर .

182

163

181

180

170

171

172

173

174

गज्य धोरीमार्गे

311

302 3422 G1/04-8

8683

59 0

99 0

88 18

88 13

46 16

84 0

94 10

14 0

0 8684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

310 निरंतर डाभेल

308

309

307

446

445

452

451

453

कच्चा रास्ता

500

499

कच्चा राम्ता 3आसना

णाला

204

205

206

207

208

210

209

247

246

245

243

244

240

239

237

267

268

269

कच्चा रास्ता

359

360 :

361

362

367

355

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

> 0

3 8685 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

354

निरंतर आसना

352

349

मीठाला नदी

[फा. सं. एल-14014/39/2004-जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th November, 2004

S. O. 3032.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Natural Gas through an interconnection between Jamnagar Bhopal and Kakinada Hyderabad-Goa pipeline, a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user (ROU) in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri A.K. Sanghavi , Competent Authority , Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project , Atlanta Tower , 3rd Floor . Opp Inqulab Society, Gulbai Tekra, Ellisbridge , Ahmedabad - 380 006, Gujarat .

8686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 / AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

[ PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Gandevi

District : Navsari

Name of the Village

Survey No./Block No.

2 1.Undach

1578

1579

1585

1584

1583

1590

1588

1589

Nala

1627

1594

1601

1600

Nala

1681

1684

1683

1689

1697

1698

1740

1741

1743

1744

1802

1799

1801

1800

1793

1795

1794

CartTrack

1782

River 2. Nandarkha

1087

1090

1086

1085

1093

1094

1095 State: Gujarat

Arsen to be anglesond for ROU

Hectare Are Sq.m

> 0

38 8687

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Cont'd Nandarkha

1096

1097

1099

1098

1101

1075

1017

1071

1072

1070

1063

1064

1069

1019

1068

1067

1032

1046

1045

1044

1034

1035

1036

808

Canal

Road

803

400

3.Kesali

393

392

Road

339

340

345

346

347

348

351

354

352

353

Nala

4. Ambheta

1257

1256

1258

1261

10 0

16 0

48 0

16 0

36 0

52 0

24 17

90 0

75 15

91 0

12 0

82 0

93 0

20 15

39 15

34 0

79 0

48 0

84 0

94 0

55 0

70 0

74 0

38 0

14 0

45 0

43 0

0 8688

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 Cont'd Ambheta

1260

1262

1263

5 0

25 0

96 0

CartTrack

1274

1269

1273

1272

1271

22 0

10 0

65 0

82 0

73 0

Road (ODR)

1371

1370

1369

1368

1367

1366

CartTrack

1364

1363

1362

Canal

1423

1424

Canal

Road

1425

1427

1428

Betn 75 & 81

Road (S.H)

CartTrack

186

183

184

198

200

82 0

39 0

26 0

82 0

85 0

13 0

75 0

8 8689

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Betn 200 & 208

Cont'd Ambheta

208

207

206

Nala

Nala 5. Desad

241

242

CartTrack

243

Road(ODR)

Railway Line

Veganiya Nadi

Veganiya Nadi 6.Khergam

CartTrack

Canal

CartTrack 7. Vadsanagal

142

Canal

143

120

8. Duvada

Road (Asp)

186

Canal

CartTrack

187

9. Dhanori

800

798

796

795

794

Canal

807

793

812

80 8690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27. 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 Cont'd Dhanori

813

818

819

817

820

676

675

674

673

828

Canal

829

672

671

523

680

681

Nala

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 0

10 0

8 0

7 0

19 0

30 0

65 0

15 0

42 0

95 0

21 0

25 0

10 0

69 0

95 0

23 0

Betn Nala & Asph . Road

Road (Asp)

654

653

712

648

652

651

650

649

Road(Asp)

636

630

631

632

Nala

575

576

Nala

Nala 10. Pipaldhara

551

Road

550

549

546

548

547

542

540 0

98 0

90 0

28 0

77 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

Nala

Cont'd Pipaldhara

511

481

488

482

483

478

485

474

468

469

470

466

406

405

402

404

401

400

341

342

336

337

321

323

324

312

306

311

309

310

283

CartTrack

282

281

280

275

274

279

276

277

278

287

River

River 11. Vegam

1035

1036 3422GI/04-9

8691 4

71 14

40 28

39 0

19 0

39 0

48 0 8692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

1043

Cont'd Vegam

Nala

1042

1045

Nala

1044

1046

1047

1022

1023

Road(Asp)

974

1021

1020

CartTrack

Canal

1017

1016

1015

1008

1009

Canal

1006

1005

934

945

943

944

Nala

Taluka Chikhali

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii)] 3

Dist: Navsari

1. Wankal

River

1855

1852

1854

1858

1859

1860

1861

1862

1863

1864

1828

1827

1826

1810

1811

1809

State: Gujarat

19 8693

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1802 Cont'd Wankal

1803

1801

1800

1799

1798

1797

1796

1795

1792

1793

1790

1713

1712

CartTrack

1711

1645

1709

1706

1697

1696

1698

1699

1694

1693

1692

Nala

1014

1034

1035

1033

1029

1028

1027

1025

1037

1038

1042

1024

1043

1045

1041

1044

1060

1059

1061

1067 4

54 0

14 0

33 22

48 0

57 0

24 0

22 0

90 0

98 8694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 Cont'd Wankal

1066

1065

1063

1064

725

723

722

728

724

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

29 0

74 0

Betn 724 & 711

711

716

717

713

712

710

709

708

706

707

Road(Asp)

642

Canal

645

620

Canal

Road(Asp)

647

648

649

650

651

Taluka : Navsari

Dist: Navsari

Canal

1. Khadsupa

950

Road(Asp)

955

957

956

954

953

852

Canal

853

859

860

861

State: Gujarat

63 8695

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

840 Cont'd Khadsupa

864

839

820

821

819

CartTrack

810

Canal

803

802

797

795

796

782

778

768

770

766

769

765

764

Canal

763

762

761

744

743

742

739

740

737

735

736

695

694

693

692

CartTrack

533

534

689

687

684

683

676

678 4

22 40

22 0

95 21

58 15

10 0

73 0

58 0

49 0

48 0

74 0

20 0

67 0

52 0

35 0

24 0

86 0

94 0

39 0

51 0

6 0

10 0

69 0

19.

8696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

677

Cont'd Khadsupa

Nala

675

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 3

Road (N.H-8)

674

375

2.Astgam

373

Canal

372

383

371

Road (Asp)

384

386

Betn 386 & 387

387

Betn 387 & 390

390

391

394

3. Uan

237

Nala

192

191

190

184

185

4. Munsad

477

478

479

480

481

482

487

CartTrack

488

489

490

CartTrack

512

511

510

Road(S.H)

Canal

353

354

355

35 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

356

Cont'd Munsad

379

371

376

372

378

374

375

Betn 375 & 387

387

388

276

278

272

274

273

252

CartTrack

251

250

247

248

246

Road (ODR)

149

187

188

186

183

184

179

178

177

175

Canal

1043

Canal

1037

1036

1035

1038

8697 4

89 0

0 8698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 Cont'd Munsad

1034

5. Dandeshwar

437

438

436

440

444

447

446

456

Road

455

450

Nala

487

6. Bhattai

149

142

7. Onachi

259

250

251

247

246

245

Road(S.H)

218

213

215

214

143

216

135

137

138

139

Road(Asp)

8.Moldhara

286

345

CartTrack

346

344

343

342

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

76 8699

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

341

Cont'd Moldhara

360

370

368

369

367

361

366

365

363

364

450

378

379

451

Nala

449

460

461

465

464

CartTrack

548

547

555

556

557

565

564

566

563

CartTrack

590

591

592

593

595

596

597

599

River

9. Amadpor

568

569

570

571

572

3422 GI/04 10

15 8700

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

573 Cont'd Amadpor

575

576

577

578

579

CartTrack

537

536

535

534

533

CartTrack

473

Govt. Land

492

474

491

490

489

483

481

482

242

241

240

244

239

237

236

Canal

173

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii )] 3

67 0

22 0

75 0

Road(N.H -8)

Canal

175

161

160

159

158

Canal 10. Padgha

Road(MDR)

594

593

596

Canal

598

CartTrack 0

44 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

602

Cont'd Padgha

599

558

557

556

555

Road (Asp)

Raod(Asp) 11. Vejalpor

Field Channel

Road(Asp)

100

101

Nala

116

117

120

118

121

122

Nala

151

150

149

148

Field Channel

147

146

Canal

12. Parthan

Canal

Field Channel

CartTrack

8701 3

1 8702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

Cont'd Parthan

CartTrackl

Field Canal 13. Dhaman

251

249

248

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 3

Dist: Navsari

Taluka : Jalalpor

1. Simlak

State: Gujarat

Field Channel

442

441

443

444

459

CartTrack 2. Dabhel

129

133

130

128

131

132

Canal

118

117

116

Cart Track

Canal

148

105

151

152

153

154

155

158

157

159

160

183

Canal

182

163

181

180

170

171

(18)

د 0

5 8703

भारत का राज्पत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

172

Cont'd Dabhel

173

174

Road (S.H)

311

302

310

308

309

307

446

445

452

451

453

CartTrack

500

499

CartTrack

Nala

3. Asana

204

205

206

207

208

210

209

247

246

245

243

244

240

239

237

267

268

269

20 0

9 0

CartTrack

359

360

361

362

367

355

354

352

0 8704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 1

5 Cont'd Asana

349

9 Mindhola River

[F. No. L-14014/39/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3033.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए जामनगर - भोपाल और काकीनाडा - हैदराबाद - गोवा पाइपलाइन को आपस में जोडने के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ । स्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमिं में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम् 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

काई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 3 को उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के सम्बन्ध में श्री ए. के . संघवी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जी. टी.आई. सी. एल. पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना, आनंद महल अपार्टमेंट , भुलक्का भवन शाला के सामने, आनद महल रोड, सूरत 395007 , गुजरात राज्य को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकगा । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8705

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

अनुसूची तहसील: उमरगाम

जिल्ला: वलसाड

गांव का नाम

राज्य: गुजगत

आर.भो यू करनेके लिए क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंवर / ब्लाक नं

252

1. झरोली

251

नहर

253

254

244

243

242

241

240

238

237

234

235

233

नहर

232

228

231

229

280

225

224

223

202

रास्ता

203

192

191

189

188

187

3303/1

330व

330क

330 ड

186

184

हेकटर आगे चो.मी

45 8706

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

185

निरंतर झराली

रास्ता

वाल्वी पाडा

175

176

174

167

168

165

166

161

162

116

नदी

158

154

155

रास्ता

157

रास्ता

141

139

कच्चा रास्ता

129

123

2. भीलाड

119

117

115

107

104

राज्य धारीमागें

3. वेोरलाइ

102

172

184

28 8707

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

पाडा

निरंतर वेोरलाइ

डामर रास्ता

नदी

180

डामर रास्ता 4. अच्छारी

नहर

डामर रास्ता

नदी

राज्य: गुजरात

जिल्ला: वलसाड

तहसील: पारडी

नदी

1. डुंगरा

111

115

नाला

1.16

34221/04 11

0 8708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

नाला

निरंतर डुंगरा

117

120

121

127

129

नाला

149

नाला

148

153

150

144

151

141

142

140

139

299

298

297

303

219

306

309

316

315

317

नहर

318

रास्ता

323

327

328

421

420

419

416

426

405

404

403

406

410

402

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

74 8709

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ] .

398

निरंतर डुंगरा

399

नाला

2. करवड

282

283

284

287

286

304

305

303

330

328

329

331

332

338

रास्ता

337

334

336

335

राज्य धारीमार्गे

479

482

481

480

कच्चा रास्ता

441

443

442

438

436

437

435

381

नहर

380

382

383

385

384

581

582

डामर रास्ता

0 8710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

3. कोचरवा

कच्चा रास्ता

41 ओर 82 के बीच

101

100

108

रास्ता

172

171

177

डामर रास्ता

169

168

167

180

162

160

181

161

नाला

नदी

4. पंडार

राता खाडी

253

254

250

252

{PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ))

f 0

4 0

35 8711

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

रास्ता

निरंतर पंडार

248

247

271

272

273

246.

274

282

कच्चा रास्ता

287

286

290

292

293

237

201

202

200

199

194

रास्ता

104

रास्ता

191

190

105

188

रास्ता

138

139

137

नदी

कोलक नदी 5. अंबाच

471

454पैकी

455

463+ 464+ 465

457

नाला

460

459

461

446

0 8712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

444

निरंतर अंवाच

445

रास्ता

439

437

438

424

नाला

420

422

421

417

डामर रास्ता

323

423

322

816

815

834

817

818

833

819

840

843

नाला

6. डुमलाव

नाला

515

512

513

514

509

520

521

522

523

470

467

469

468

459

460

546

कच्चा रास्ता

450

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Y 17

77 8713

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

449

निरंतर डुमलाव

448

426

447

446

434

435

436

नाला

437

196

195

194

191

186

185

164

160

165

डामर रास्ता

नहर

166

167

158

157

153

155

133

7. खुटेज

137

138

579

8. रोहीणा

डामर रास्ता

578

577

कच्चा रास्ता

115

102

106

103

104

107

105

108

0 8714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 निरंतर रोहीणा

नाला

294

9. तरमालीया

कच्चा रास्ता

275

274

276

273

279

279और 249 के बीच

249

250

251

252

253

डामर रास्ता

126

133

132

128

131

130

109

110

108

104

103

103और 102 के वीच

102

102और 101 के वीच

102 और 101 के वीच

101

कच्चा रास्ता

नाला

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3

35 8715

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

559

10. सोनवाडा

नाला

542

543

कच्चा रास्ता

557

544

546

533

532

507

नाला

508

510

509

505

512

513

521

519

520

518

517

516

1 और 1 से 9 / पै के वीच

(1 से 9 / पै )

रास्ता

नाला

नाला और 107 के बीच

107

3422G1/04 12

0 8716

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

नहर

निरंतर सोनवाडा

112

118

121

122

नाला

129

128

127

126

134

135

136

कच्चा रास्ता

142

141

140

166

नाला

11. सुखेश

458

457

456

429

455

430

431

432

433

450

448

471

472

444

474

443

442

राज्य धारीमार्गे

279

278

276

281

275

283

284

-0

34 8717

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

290

निरंतर सुखेश

289

297

311

301

310

309

313

314

321

317

315

227

12.सोनंघलवाडा

222

228

226

कच्चा रास्ता

223

221

219

216

215

नाला

13. परवासा

227

228

229

230

239

235

238

236

कच्चा रास्ता

308

309

321

320

327

कच्चा रास्ता

328

कच्चा रास्ता

331

330

332

335

0 8718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 निरंतर परवामा

पर नदी

तहमील : वलसाड

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 3

जिल्ला: वलसाड

1. नवेग

पर नदी

968

972

971

973

983

कच्चा रास्ता

890

894

893

886

900

वेलंडी नदी

881

876

877

कच्चा रास्ता

875

874

865

867

849

डामर रास्ता

846

842

नहर

841

नाला

764

763

748

746

743

742

739

738

734

732

465

2. अंजलाव

नहर

466

राज्य: गुजरात

65 8719

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

कच्चा रास्ता निरंतर अम्जलाव

463

462

कच्चा रास्ता

448

445

446

447

449

444

443

439

440

441

442

1305

3. गाडरीया

1306

1304

1307

1302

1301

1300

1298

1297

1299

1296

1295

1291

1290

1284

1285

1280

1289

1279

1274

1275

1278

1277

राज्य धारीमार्गे

1093

1092

1094

1096

1090

नाला

0 8720

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

1098

निरंतर गाडरीया

1099

1085

1100

1074

1075

1076

1072

1077

1034

1035

1033

नहर

1026

1027

नाला

4. कांजनहारी

वांकी नदी

164

163

162

145

146

144

147

161

148

149

नहर

150

118

126

125

119

डामर रास्ता

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) |

73 8721

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

निरंतर कांजनहारी

नदी

5. ठककरवाडा

274

273

275

313

315

316

308

293

डामर रास्ता

302

301

332

331

335

336

डामर रास्ता

585

6. कलवाडा

584

नहर

583

613

614

नाला

567

566

नहर

569

512

515

508

517

516

518

520

0 8722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

519

निरंतर कलवाडा

500

504

501

502

503

7. कोचवाडा

118

117

रास्ता

114

112

109

113

108

171

172

173

289

288

287

नहर

286

रास्ता ( ओ.डी.आर)

223

224

225

227

226

203

8. फनसवाडा

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 3

69 8723

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

216

निरंतर फनसवाडा

211

212

नहर

210

301

300

302

309

504

310

503

323

नहर

500

490

488

डामर रास्ता

344

487

486

485

नहर

484

483

482

नहर

कच्चा रास्ता

366

367

368

369

370

371

नाला

372

373

374

375

डामर रास्ता

1095 9. घनेारी

1096

नहर

1090 3422 G1/04 13

7 8724

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

1091

निरंतर घनारी

1089

1088

रास्ता ( ओम.डी.आर)

878

879

880

881

883

882

868

905

907

908

910

912

कच्चा रास्ता

रास्ता

919

851

858

854

नाला

855

857

707

856

710

709

708

712

375

नाला

358

328

331

329

नहर

319

330

313

309

311

312

नहर

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

4 0

15 8725

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

312

निरंतर घनारी

280

287

277

278

नहर

233

10. तीद्यरा

232

231

230

227

226

225

डामर रास्ता

220

218

219

217

221

136

135

134

डामर रास्ता

128

129

नाला

336

11. गेोरगाम

337

331

340

कच्चा रास्ता

325

324

323

कच्चा रास्ता

315

314

300

कच्चा रास्ता

138

143

नहर

264

263 4

0 8726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 निरंतर गोरगाम

कच्चा रास्ता

252

253

254

259

258

255

256

257

231

232

215

221

228

222

223

220

219

218

डामर रास्ता

880

881

878

882

883

884

885

886

रास्ता ( मेटल)

949

950

917

916

915

918

919

913

नाला

914

नाला

910

124

12. वाघलधरा

123

125

122

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )] 3

99 8727

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

121

निरंतर वाघलधरा

120

कच्चा रास्ता

128

गटर

डामर रास्ता

392

391

404

घेोरीमार्गे 8

400

399

398

409

426

427

425

378

428

429

कच्चा रास्ता

377

376

375

366

368

नदी

557

558

559

560

554

561

562

563

564

565

566

590

583

582

584

589

581

0 8728

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926

2 निरंतर वाघलधरा

585

कच्चा रास्ता

769

768

766

763

762

761

760

रास्ता ( ओम.डी.आर)

662

663

कच्चा रास्ता

661

664

667

668

669

674

677

676

675

680

694

682

687

686

688

689

685

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

[फा. सं. एल-14014/40/2004-जी.पी. ] एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 16th November, 2004

S. O. 3033. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest to lay pipeline for transportation of Natural Gas through an interconnection between Jamnagar -Bhopal and Kakinada -Hydarabad Goa pipeline, by M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited,

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user (ROU) in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

8729

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri A.K.Sanghavi ,, Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project , Atlanta Tower, 3rd Floor , Opp. Inqulab Society , Gulbai Tekra , Ellisbridge , Ahmedabad - 380 006, Gujarat .

SCHEDULE

District: Valsad

Tehsil : Umargam

Name of the Village Survey No./Block No.

252

1. Zaroli

251

Canal

253

254

244

243

242

241

240

238

237

234

235

233

Canal

232

228

231

229

280

225

224

223

202

Road

203

192

191

189

188

187

330A/ 1

330B

330C State: Gujarat

Areato be acqui ref

Hectare Are

Sq.m

0 8730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

2 Cont'd Zaroii

330D

186

184

185

Road

Walvi Pada

175

176

174

167

168

165

166

161

162

116

River

158

154

155

Road

157

Road

141

139

CartTrack

129

2. Bhilad

123

119

117

115

107

104

Road ( S.H)

3. Borlai

102

172

[ PART 11 -SEC. 3 ( ii ) | 3

20 8731

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6 ,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Cont'd Borlai

184

Pada

Road(Asp)

River

180

4. Achchhari

Road (Asp)

Canal

Road (Asp)

River 3

Dist: Valsad

Taluka: Pardi

River 1. Dungara

111

115

Nala

116

Nala 3422 G1/04 14

State: Gujarat

35-

0 8732

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

117

Cont'd Dungara

120

121

127

129

Nala

149

Nala

148

153

150

144

151

141

142

140

139

299

298

297

303

219

306

309

316

315

317

Canal

318

Road(S.H)

323

327

328

421

420

419

416

426

405

404

403

406

410

402

398

399

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

86 8733

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Nala 2. Karvad

282

283

284

287

286

304

305

303

330

328

329

331

332

338

Road

337

334

336

335

Road(S.H)

479

482

481

480

CartTrack

441

443

442

438

436

437

435

381

Canal

380

382

383

385

384

581

582

Road(Asp)

3. Kocharava

0 8734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 Cont'd Kocharava

CartTrack

Betn 41 & 82

101

100

108

Road

172

171

177

Road(Asp)

169

168

167

180

162

160

181

161

Nala

River

4. Pandor

Rata Khadi

253

254

250

252

Road

248

247

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 4

69 8735

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Cont'd Pandor

271

272

273

246

274

282

CartTrack

287

286

290

292

293

237

201

202

200

199

194

Road

104

Road

191

190

105

188

Road

138

139

137

River

Kolak River 5. Ambach

471

454P

455

463+464+465

457

Nala

460

459

461

446

444

445

0 .

0 8736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 Cont'd Ambach

Road

439

437

438

424

Nala

420

422

421

417

Road(Asp)

323

423

322

816

815

834

817

818

833

819

840

843

Nala

6. Dumlav

Nala

515

512

513

514

509

520

521

522

523

470

467

469

468

459

460

546

CartTrack

450

449

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii )] 3

95 8737

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

448

Cont'd Dumlav

426

447

446

434

435

436

Nala

437

196

195

194

191

186

185

164

160

165

Road (Asp)

Canal

166

167

158

157

153

155

133 7. Khutej

137

138

579 8. Rohina

Road(Asp)

578

577

CartTrack

115

102

106

103

104

107

105

108

0 8738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 Cont'd Rohina

Nala

294

9. Tarmaliya

CartTrack

275

274

276

273

279

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

Betn 279 & 249

249

250

251

252

253

Road(Asp)

126

133

132

128

131

130

109

110

108

104

103

Betn 103 & 102

102

Betn 102 & 101

101

11.

CartTrack

Nala

35 8739

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii )]

559

10. Sonwada

Nala

542

543

CartTrack

557

544

546

533

532

507

Nala

508

510

509

505

512

513

521

519

520

518

517

516

Betn 1 & ( 1 to 9 / P )

(1 to 9 / P)

Road

Nala

Betn Nala & 107

107 3422 G1/04 15

0 8740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 Cont'd Sonwada

Canal

112

118

121

122

Nala

129

128

127

126

134

135

136

CartTrack

142

141

140

166

Nala

11. Sukhesh

Nala

458

457

456

429

455

430

431

432

433

450

448

471

472

444

474

443

442

Road (S.H)

279

278

276

281

275

283

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

▼ 0

96 8741

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

284

Cont'd Sukhesh

290

289

297

311

301

310

309

313

314

321

317

315

227

12.Sondhalwada

222

228

226

CartTrack

223

221

219

216

215

Nala

Nala 13. Parwasa

227

228

229

230

239

235

238

236

CartTrack

308

309

321

320

327

CartTrack

328

CartTrack

331

330 4

0 8742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 Cont'd Parwasa

332

335

ParRiver Taluka : Valsad

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 4

Dist: Valsad

1. Navera

ParRiver

968

972

971

973

983

CartTrack

890

894

893

886

900

Velandi Nadi

881

876

877

CartTrack

875

874

865

867

849

Road(Asp)

846

842

Canal

841

Nala

764

763

748

746

743

742

739

738

734

732

731

State: Gujarat

39 8743

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

465

2.Anjalav

Canal

466

CartTrack

463

462

CartTrack

448

445

446

447

449

444

443

439

440

441

442

1305 3. Gadariya

1306

1304

1307

1302

1301

1300

1298

1297

1299

1296

1295

1291

1290

1284

1285

1280

1289

1279

1274

1275

1278

1277

Road (S.H)

1093

1092

0 8744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

1094 Cont'd Gadariya

1096

1090

Nala

1098

1099

1085

1100

1074

1075

1076

1072

1077

1034

1035

1033

Canal

1026

1027

Nala

Wanki Nadi 4. Kanjanhari

164

163

162

145

146

144

147

161

148

149

Canal

150

118

126

125

119

Road(Asp)

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 4

30 8745

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Cont'd Kanjanhari

River

River 5. Thakkarwada

274

273

275

313

315

316

308

293

Road(Asp)

302

301

332

331

335

336

Road(Asp)

585 6. Kalwada

584

Canal

583

613

614

Nala

567

566

Canal در

0 8746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA6 , 1926

2 Cont'd Kalwada

569

512

515

508

517

516

518

520

519

500

504

501

502

503

7. Kochvada

118

117

Road

114

112

109

113

108

171

172

173

289

288

287

Canal

286

Road(ODR)

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

46 8747

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

223 Cont'd Kochvada

224

225

227

226

203

8. Fanaswada

216

211

212

Canal

210

301

300

302

309

504

310

503

323

Canal

500

490

488

Road(Asp)

344

487

486

485

Canal

484

483

482

Canal

CartTrack

366

367

368

369

370

371

Nala

372

373

374

375

Road (Asp)

1095 9. Dhanori

G104 1

0 8748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 Cont'd Dhanori

1096

Canal

1090

1091

1089

1088

Road (MDR)

878

879

880

881

883

882

868

905

907

908

910

912

CartTrack

Road

919

851

858

854

Nala

855

857

707

856

710

709

708

712

375

Nala

358

328

331

329

Canal

319

330

313

309

311

312

PART 1 S3 ( 11 ) | 3

35 8749

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Canal Cont'd Dhanori

312

280

287

277

278

Canal

233 10. Tighara

232

231

230

227

226

225

Road(Asp)

220

218

219

217

221

136

135

134

Road(Asp)

128

129

Nala

336 11. Gorgam

337

331

340

CartTrack

325

324

323

CartTrack

315

314

300

CartTrack

138

143

Canal

264

263

CartTrack

252

0 X750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27.2004/AGRAHAYANA 6. 1920

253

Cont'd Gorgam

254

259

258

255

256

257

231

232

215

221

228

222

223

220

219

218

Road (Asp)

S80

881

878

882

883

884

885

886

Road ( Metal)

949

950

917

916

915

918

919

913

Nala

914

Nala

910

124

12. Vaghaldhara

123

125

122

121

120

Cart Track

[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) | 3

97 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

128 Cont'd Vaghaldhara

Drain

Road(Asp)

392

391

404

Road (N.H -8)

400

399

398

409

426

427

425

378

428

429

CartTrack

377

376

375

366

368

River

557

558

559

560

554

561

562

563

564

565

566

590

583

582

584

589

581

585

CartTrack

769

768

766

763

8751

0 8752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

762 Cont'd Vaghaldhara

761

760

Road(MDR)

662

663

CartTrack

661

664

667

668

669

674

677

676

675

680

694

682

687

686

688

689

685

PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) | 3

[ F. No. L - 14014/40/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 17 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3034.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा ( गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. राम करण शर्मा, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान संख्या -1418 , सेक्टर 6, बहादुरगढ़- 124507, जिला सकेगा । झज्जर (हरियाणा) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज

अनुसुची

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल

वर्गमीटर

एयर

गाँव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

1. बादली

3/1

3/2

8/4

25/1

25/2

5/1

7/1

7/2

12 8754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

1. बादली (जारी... )

15/1

15/2

16/2

24/1

24/2

9/1

9/2

51 8755

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926,170

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल

खसरा किला

गाँव का नाम

एयर वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर

संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

1283

1. बादली (जारी...)

9/3

9/1

9/2

25/2

0336

25/3

3422 GJ/04 17 8756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA6. 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) | तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

खसरा किला

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 1. बादली (जारी... )

25/4

104

136

2/1

2/2

2/3

620(नहर)

634(कक्षा रास्ता) 00

635(सड़क) 00

675(जल)

678(खाल)

680 (भाला)

724(रास्ता)

2059(रास्ता)

2061 (रास्ता)

2151 (कक्षा रास्ता)

2154(रास्ता)

2170 (रास्ता)

2187 (रास्ता)

2193(रास्ता)

17 2. महमदपुर माजरा

6/1

90 8757 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

$60

14/2/1

2. महमदपुर माजरा (जारी... )

14/2/2

15/1

15/2

16/2

17/1/1

17/1/2

17/2/1

17/2/2

24/1

10/1

10/2

2/1

2/2

6/1

6/2

16 8758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

2. महमदपुर माजरा (जारी...) 88

24/1

24/2

39(सड़क)

85(जल)

86(आल)

97 (कक्षा रास्ता)

98(कक्षा रास्ता)

123(खाल)

60 3. गोयला कलां

22/1

21/1

21/2

80 8759

नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

भारत का राजपत्र

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरमद

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

3. मोयला कलां (जारी ... )

21/1

21/2

5/1

5/2

5/3

93(सड़क)

151(रास्ता)

482(कक्षा रास्ता)

489(रास्ता)

490(कक्षा रास्ता)

90 9

4. बुपनियां

20/1

20/2

5/2

6/1

6/2

6/4

7 8760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 / AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

खसरा/ किला

गाँव का नाम

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

संख्या हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

4. बुपनियां (जारी... )

15/1

15/2

16/1

17/1

17/2

19/1

22/1

220

14/1

14/2

86 8761

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग ।।- खण्ड ( ii) |

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

4. बुपनियां (जारी... )

00.

4/1

4/2

18/1

18/2

10/1

10/2

25/2

6/1

6/2

00-

18 8762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

[ PART II--SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

4. बुपनियां (जारी ... )

121

127

25/1

25/2

128

2/1

2/2

20/1

152

5/1

5/2

18 8763 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा किला संख्या

152

4. बुपनियां (जारी... )

159

8/1

8/2

19/1

19/2

20/2

22/1

1/1

181

1/2

10/1

10/2

182

16/1

16/2

185

7/1

7/2

3422 G1/04 18 8764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा किला संख्या हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

4. बुपनियां (जारी ... )

185

205

8/1

8/2

244(खाल)

257(खाल)

260(नहर)

261(खाल)

262(खाल)

268(खाल)

272(खाल)

276(खाल)

278(खाल)

284(खाल)

286(खाल)

293 (खाल)

294(खाल)

302(कक्षा रास्ता)

306(सड़क)

307(सड़क)

1478(कच्या रास्ता)

1498(कच्या रास्ता)

1505(खाल)

1506(कच्या रास्ता)

1516(कक्षा रास्ता)

1523(रास्ता)

1665(कक्षा रास्ता)

1672(जल)

1673(रास्ता)

5. डाबोदा खुर्द

03 8765 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

5. डाबोदा खुर्द ( जारी ... )

23/2

3/2

4/1

4/2/1

8/1/1

8/1/2

: 00

8/2/1

13/2/2

18/1

23/2

3/2

4/1

8/1

13/2

24/1

24/2

67 8766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2000) 4 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

PART II -SE . 3 ( ii ) | तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा। किला संख्या हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्गमीटर 5. डाबोदा खुर्द (जारी ... )

8/1

12/1

12/2

13/1/1

13/1/2

20/1

20/2

8/1

14/2

17/1

17/2

23/2

10/2

37 8767

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

2/1

107

5. डाबोदा खुर्द ( जारी... )

2/2

3/1

3/2

9/1

9/2

117(रास्ता)

134(रास्ता)

148/2(खाल)

151/2(खाल)

154/2(खाल)

157(खाल)

162(सड़क)

165 (सड़क)

168/2(कक्षा रास्ता)

288(रास्ता)

495(रास्ता)

501(रास्ता)

523/2(रास्ता)

543/2(रास्ता)

6. महन्दीपुर

8/2

12/1

12/2

21 8768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा किला संख्या हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

6. महन्दीपुर (जारी ... )

11/2

20/1

20/2

5/2

14/1

14/2

5/1

5/2

21 8769

नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

भारत का राजपत्र

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल

खसरा किला

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

6. महन्दीपुर (जारी ... )

17/1

17/2

64/2(खाल)

68/1 (खाल)

78/2(रास्ता)

159(रास्ता)

160(रास्ता)

168/2(रास्ता)

7. डाबोदा कलां

2/1

2/2

10/1

12/1

7/1

712

18 8770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

7. डाबोदा कलां (जारी... )

23/1

23/2

63(जल)

64(जल)

81 (रास्ता)

331 (रास्ता)

8. मान्डोठी

1262

1263

1264

1266

1273

1274

1275

1314

1365

1366

1367

1375

1377

1378

1380

1381

1382

5427/1388/1

5417/1442/3

(बहर)5418/1441/2

5420/1441/3 00

(बहर)5423/1440/2

5425/1440/1 00

10 8771 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल

खसरा/ किला

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

1444

8. मान्डोठी (जारी ... )

1445

1473

1474

1475

1544

1545

1549

1550

1551

1552

1554

1555

1556

1557

1558

1717

1718

1719

1720

4736/1722/1 00

4737/1722/2

1723/1

1723/2

1724/1

1724/2

1721

1726

1741

1742

1743

3422 GI/04 19 8772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[ PART II -- SEC, 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

8. मान्डोठी (जारी... )

1752

1753

1754

1755

1756

1767

1768

4591/1770/1

4592/1770/2 00

4593/1770/3 00

(माला) 1779

1780

(नाला) 1878

2212

2213

4662/2217/1

4663/2217/2

2218

2224

2225

2228

2231

2233

2235

(नाला) 2236

2237

2424

15 9. जाखोदा

5/1

6/2

15/1

15/2

35 8773 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्यःहरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

9. जाम्रोदा (जारी...)

24/2

6/1

6/2

7/1

7/2

13/1

20/1

20/2

84(बहर)

92(जाल)

117 (सड़क)

801 (जाल)

802(रास्ता)

826

10. आसोदा टोडरान

830 8774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA6 , 1926

[ PART II - SEC . 3( ii) ] तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

वर्गमीटर

एयर

10. आसोदा टोडराब (जारी... )

831

3110/832

836

837

838

[फा. सं. आर-31015/48/2004-ओ.आर-II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th November, 2004

S. O. 3034.- Whereas it appears to the Central Govemment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum productsfrom Mundra (Gujarat) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

, And whereas,it appears to the Central Govemment that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferredby sub -section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the landto Shri Ram Karan Sharma, Competent Authority, Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, H. No. 1418 , Sector - 6, Bahadurgarh - 124507, District - Jhajjar (Haryana).

8775 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

State : HARYANA

District: JHAJJAR

Tehsil :BAHADURGARH

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara/ Killa No.

Square Metre

Mustil No.

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

10 1.BADLI

3/1

3/2

8/4

25/1

25/2

5/1

7/1

712

12 8776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

District : JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Haubast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

1. BADLI ( Contd... )

15/1

15/2

16/2

24/1

24/2

9/1

9/2

51 8777

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Area

Are

Hectare

Name of Village

Khasara / KillaNo.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

1. BADLI (Contd ... )

9/3

9/1

9/2

25/2

25/3 8778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[ PART II- SE . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

District : JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara/ Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

25/4

1. BADLI ( Contd... )

104

136

2/1

2/2

2/3

620(Canal )

634 (C.T)

635(Road)

675(Khal)

678 (Khal)

680(Nala)

724(Path)

2059(Path)

2061(Path)

2151 (C.T)

2154(Path)

2170 (Path)

2187(Path)

2193 (Path)

2. MOHAMAD PUR MAJRA

6/1

90 8779 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Name of Village

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

14/2/1

2. MOHAMAD PUR MAJRA

14/2/2

(Contd...)

15/1

15/2

16/2

17/1/1

17/1/2

17/2/1

17/2/2

24/1

10/1

10/2

2/1

2/2

6/1

6/2

3422 G1/04 20 8780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2 (X )4/AGRAHAYANA6 , 1926

PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

District: JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

2. MOHAMAD PUR MAJRA

24/1

10 (Contd...)

24/2

39(Road)

85(Khal)

86(Khal)

97 ( C.T)

98 (C.T)

123(Khal)

3. GOYALA KALAN

22/1

21/1

21/2

80 8781 भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Area

Are

Hectare

Nameof Village

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

21/1

3. GOYALA KALAN (Contd... )

21/2

5/1

5/2

5/3

93(Road)

151(Path)

482(C.T)

489(Path)

490(C.T)

4. BHUPANIA

20/1

20/2

5/2

6/1

6/2

6/4

7 8782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

District : JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

4. BHUPANIA ( Contd ...)

15/1

15/2

16/1

17/1

17/2

19/1

22/1

220

14/1

14/2

86 8783 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State: HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Nameof Village

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

4. BHUPANIA (Contd... )

4/1

4/2

18/1

18/2

10/1

10/2

25/2

6/1

6/2

18 8784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

PART 11 - SEC . 3 (ii) | Tehsil :BAHADURGARH

District : JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

4. BHUPANIA (Contd ...)

121

127

25/1

25/2

128

2/1

2/2

20/1

152

5/1

5/2

18 8785 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Area

Nameof Village

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

152

4. BHUPANIA (Contd...)

159

8/1

8/2

19/1

19/2

20/2

22/1

1/1

181

1/2

10/1

10/2

182

16/1

16/2

185

7/1

7/2

23 8786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

District : JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

185

49 4. BHUPANIA ( Contd... )

205

8/1

8/2

244(Khal)

257 (Khal)

260(Canal )

261(Khal )

262(Khal )

268(Khal )

272(Khal)

276(Khal)

278 ( Khal )

284(Khal)

286(Khal )

293(Khal)

294(Khal)

302(C.T)

306(Road)

307 ( Road)

1478 (C.T)

1498 (C.T)

1505(Khal )

1506( C.T)

1516(C.T)

1523 (Path)

1665 (C.T)

1672(Khal )

1673 (Path)

5. DABODA KHURD

03 8787 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

District : JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA Tehsil :BAHADURGARH

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / KillaNo. Hectare Are

Square Metre

5. DABODA KHURD (Contd...)

23/2

3/2

4/1

4/2/1

8/1/1

8/1/2

8/2/1

13/2/2

18/1

23/2

3/2

4/1

8/1

13/2

24/1

24/2

3422 (Gl04 21 8788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 / AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

District : JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA

Area Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / KillaNo. Hectare Are

Square Metre

5. DABODA KHURD

51 (Contd...)

8/1

12/1

12/2

13/1/1

13/1/2

20/1

20/2

8/1

14/2

17/1

17/2

23/2

10/2

37 8789 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State: HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Area

Are

Hectare

Name of Village

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

2/1

107

2/2

5. DABODA KHURD (Contd...)

3/1

3/2

9/1

9/2

117 (Path)

134(Path)

148/2(Khal)

151/2 (Khal)

154/2(Khal)

157(Khal)

162(Road) 00

165 (Road)

168/2(C.T)

288(Path)

495 (Path)

501(Path)

523/2(Path)

543/2( Path)

6. MEHINDIPUR

8/2

12/1

12/2

21 8790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II SE 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

District: JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

6. MEHINDIPUR ( Contd... )

11/2

20/1

20/2

5/2

14/1

14/2

5/1

5/2

21 8791 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग 1 ] -खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Area

Nameof Village

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No,

Square Metre

6. MEHINDIPUR (Contd...)

17/1

17/2

64/2(Khal)

68/1 (Khal )

78/2(Path)

159 (Path)

160(Path)

168/2(Path)

7. DABODA KALAN

2/1

2/2

10/1

12/1

7/1

7/2

18 8792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii ) | Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

District : JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara/ Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

23/1

59 7. DABODA KALAN (Contd...)

23/2

63(Khal)

64(Khal)

81(Path)

331(Path)

67 8. MANDOTHI

1262

1263

1264

1266

1273

1274

1275

1314

1365

1366

1367

1375

1377

1378

1380

1381

1382

5427/1388/1

5417/1442/3

(Canal ) 5418/1441/2 00

5420/1441/3 00

(Canal ) 5423/1440/2

5425/1440/1

10 8793

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड ( i) ]

State : HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Area Nameof Village

Are

Hectare

Khasara/ Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

1444

8. MANDOTHI ( Contd ... )

1445

1473

1474

1475

1544

1545

1549

1550

1551

1552

1554

1555

1556

1557

1558

1717

1718

1719

1720

4736/1722/1 00

4737/1722/2 00

1723/1

1723/2

1724/1

1724/2

1721

1726

1741

1742

1743 8794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

District: JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare

Are

Square Metre

8. MANDOTHI ( Contd... )

1752

1753

1754

1755

1756

1767

1768

4591/1770/1 00

4592/1770/2 00

4593/1770/3 00

(Nala) 1779

1780

(Nala) 1878

2212

2213

4662/2217/1 00

4663/2217/2 00

2218

2224

2225

2228

2231

2233

2235

(Nala) 2236

2237

2424

15 9. JAKHODA

5/1

6/2

15/1

15/2

35 8795 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: HARYANA

District: JHAJJAR

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Area

Nameof Village

Hectare Are

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

9. JAKHODA ( Contd... )

24/2

6/1

6/2

7/1

7/2

13/1

20/1

20/2

84(Canal)

92(Khal)

117(Road)

801(Khal)

802(Path)

826

10. ASUDHA TODRAN

830

3422 104 22 8796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

Tehsil : BAHADURGARH

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

28 10. ASUDHA TODRAN (Contd... )

PART II SE . 3 (ii ) ]

District: JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Khasara / KillaNo. Hectare Are

Square Metre 831

30 3110/832

83 836

63 837

46 838

[No. R-31015/48/2004- O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 18 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3035.- तेल उद्योग (विकास) अधिनियम , 1974 ( 1974 का 47) की धारा-3 की उपधारा ( 3) द्वारा प्रदत्त की गई शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित अधिकारियों को तेल उद्योग विकास बोर्ड के सदस्य के रूप में, उनके सामने दर्शायी गई अवधि के लिए , अगले आदेश जारी होने या जो भी पहले हो , नियुक्त/पुनर्नियुक्त करती है: -

1. श्री पी.के सिन्हा, संयुक्त सचिव एवं वित्तीय सलाहकार , पेट्रोलियम एवं प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

2. श्री एस. बहुरिया , अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक, भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लि०

3. श्री वी .के सिबल , महा निदेशक , हाइड्रोकार्बन महानिदेशालय

से

तक

4.11.2004

3.11.2006

1.7.2004

30.6.2006

1.11.2004

31.10.2006

[फा. सं. जी-35012/2/91 -वित्त-11 ] सुनीता शर्मा , अवर सचिव 8797 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

NewDelhi , the 18th November, 2004

S. O. 3035. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (c) of Sub- section (3) of Section 3 of the Oil Industry (Development ) Act, 1974 (47 of 1974 ), the Central Government hereby appoints/ re- appoints the following officers as Members of the Oil Industry Development Board for the period shown against their names or until further orders , whichever is earlier :

From

3.11.2006

4.11.2004

1. Shri P.K. Sinha , Joint Secretary & Financial Adviser , Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas .

30.6.2006

1.7.2004

Shri S. Behuria , CMD, BPCL

31.10.2006

1.11.2004

Shri V.K. Sibal , DG , DGH.

[No.G-35012/2/91- Fin . - II ] SUNITA SHARMA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3036.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. राम करण शर्मा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान संख्या - 1418 , सेक्टर बहादुरगढ़ -- 124507, जिला सकेगा । झज्जर 6, (हरियाणा) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज 8798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 6, 1926 [PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसुची

तहसीलः पाटौदी

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

राज्यः हरियाणा

खसरा /किला

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 1. घीलबावास

273

00 10

25/1

02 83

25/2

00 01

05 66

11 05

05 53

1/1

03 61

07 44

15/1

01 84

15/2

08 60

11 05

25/1

00 . 10

00 04 87

5/1

00 04

00 00 10

14/1

14/2

17/1/2

17/2

00 20

119

127

129

02 87 2. खलीलपुर

272

25/2

00 00 13

53 8799

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा तहसीलः पाटौदी

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

21/1

272

2. खलीलपुर (जारी... )

21/2

6/1

15/3

25/1

25/2

14/1

14/2

17/1

17/2

18/2

4/1

18/1

18/3

23/1

जाडी 4 8800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] तहसीलः पाटौदी

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/किला संख्या

एयर

हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर 2. खलीलपुर (जारी... )

272

9/1

05 $92

9/2

03 54

19/1

08 25

19/2

21/1

00 27

21/2

2/1

10/1

10/2

06 45

368

387

392

393

402

410

30 3. खेतियावास

268

10 85

12 00

712

05 02

8/1

8/2

13/1

13/2

10 48 8801 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

तहसीलः पाटौदी

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

268

3. खेतियावास ( जारी... )

24/2

6/1

7/1

7/2

14/1

14/2

17/2

00.

12/2

19/1

141

144

2/1

271

4. बलेवा

9/2

10/1

11/2 8802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926 [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसीलः पाटौदी

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

राज्यः हरियाणा गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा /किला संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 4. बलेवा (जारी ... )

271

12/1

03 22

12/4

19/2

06 92

176

00 60

177

00 60 5. बपास

266

03 54

15/1

02 10

15/2

00 00 10

17/1

04 88

17/2/1

05 99

17/2/2

10 75

4/1

00 01

8/1

8/2

9/1

13/1

04 89

223

00 42 6. गांगली

267

04 51

03 08

00 09 02

10 8803 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा तहसीलः पाटौदी

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

267

6. गांगली (जारी... )

01 30

16/2

22सड़क

265

7. पहाड़ी

2/1

10/1

10/2

00 08

25/2

2/1

2/2

12/1

3422 G1/04 23 8804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] तहसीलः पाटौदी

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा /किला संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 7. पहाड़ी (जारी... )

265

1/1

00 03 35

06 78

12 16

52/1

05 40

308

319

00 21

320

00 20

324/1

8. मौजाबाद

00 93

10 21

11 64

7/1

02 48

11 02

6/1

9. डाडावास

04 39

24/1

00 18

00 8805

नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

भारत का राजपत्र

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

तहसीलः पाटौदी

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

9. डाडावास (जारी... )

8/1

8/2

18/1

18/2

10. हकदारपुर

21/1

21/2

22/1

14/2

16/1

16/2

25/1

10/2

7/1

7/2

14/1

18 8806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] तहसीलः पाटौदी

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

राज्यःहरियाणा गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा /किला संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 10. हकदारपुर (जारी ... )

00 00 16

00 08 90

23/1

01 07

23/2

01 79

25/2

02 64

11 64

10 80

00 00 84

09 48

00 01

21/1

03 88

21/2

1/1

00 00 31

11 27

6/1

00 02 54

6/2/1

6/2/2

17/1

17/2

24/1

24/2

00 20

73/2

01 49

105

00 60

107

18 11. शेरपुर

08 92 8807

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा तहसीलः पाटौदी

जिलाः मुद्दगाँव

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

11. शेरपुर (जारी...)

14/2

15/1

7/1

7/2

8/1

14/1

23/1

23/2

23/3

23/1

23/2

2/1

2/2

00 41

3/1

9/1

9/2 8808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसीलः पाटौदी

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/किला संख्या

एयर

हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर 11. शेरपुर (जारी ...)

9/3

03 11

03 84

22/1

1/2

10 97

09 11

11/2

01 79

20/1

20/2

21/1

02 92

2112

08 04

15/1

15/2

17/1

17/2

00 51

24/1

24/2

7/2

13/1

13/2

40 8809 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

तहसीलः पाटौदी

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

11. शेरपुर (जारी ... )

23/1

9/1

9/2

10/2

79/1

268

270

305

12. राजपुरा

2/1

2/2

10/1

11/2

12/1

20 8810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] तहसीलः पाटौदी

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/किला संख्या

एयर

हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर 12. राजपुरा (जारी ... )

00 11

00 02 82

00 08 87

00 00 20

00 11 49

4/1/1

06 36

4/1/2

00 10

11 79

00 00 64

00 11 15

18/1

00 00 88

18/2

00 00

19/1

19/2

11 79

16/1

00 00 64

1/1

1/2

04 04

00 07 36

00 11 23

08 03

20/1

00 02 42

20/2

00 08 00 8811 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा तहसीलः पाटौदी

जिलाः गुड़गाँव

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

संख्या हदबस्त

12. राजपुरा (जारी ... )

174

[फा. सं. आर-31015/49/2004-ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th November , 2004

S. O. 3036.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the landto Shri Ram Karan Sharma, Competent Authority, Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, H. No. 1418, Sector - 6, Bahadurgarh - 124507, District - Jhajjar ( Haryana).

3422 G1/04 24 8812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii ) )

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : PATODI

District: GURGAON

State : HARYANA

Area Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre 1. GHILANAWAS

273

25/1

25/2

1/1

15/1

15/2

25/1

5/1

14/1

14/2

17/1/2

17/2

119

127

129

87 2. KHALILPUR

272

25/2

53 8813 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District : GURGAON

Tehsil : PATODI

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Name of Village

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

21/1

272

2. KHALILPUR ( Contd ... )

21/2

6/1

15/3

25/1

25/2

14/1

14/2

17/1

17/2

18/2

4/1

18/1

18/3

23/1

3 8814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] Tehsil : PATODI

District: GURGAON

State: HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

272

9/1

2. KHALILPUR ( Contd... )

9/2

19/1

19/2

21/1

21/2

2/1

10/1

10/2

368

387

392

393

402

410

30 3. KHETIAWAS

268

7/2

8/1

8/2

13/1

13/2

48 8815

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District: GURGAON

Tehsil : PATODI

Area

Are

Hectare

Name of Village

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

268

3. KHETIAWAS ( Contd ... )

24/2

6/1

7/1

7/2

14/1

14/2

17/2

12/2

19/1

141

144

2/1

271

4. BALEWA

9/2

10/1

11/2 8816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Tehsil : PATODI

District: GURGAON

State: HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

271

4. BALEWA ( Contd... )

12/1

12/4

19/2

176

177

60 5. BAPAS

266

15/1

15/2

17/1

17/2/1

17/2/2

4/1

8/1

8/2

9/1

13/1

223

42 6.GANGLI

267

10 8817

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State: HARYANA

District : GURGAON

Tehsil : PATODI

Area Name of Village

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

267

6. GANGLI ( Contd... )

16/2

22Road

265

7. PAHARI

2/1

10/1

10/2

25/2

2/1

2/2

12/1

19 8818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

PART IH-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : PATODI

District: GURGAON

State : HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

265

7. PAHARI ( Contd...)

1/1

52/1

308

319

320

324/1

20 8. MOZZABAD

7/1

6/1

36 9. DADAWAS

24/1

18 8819 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6.1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District: GURGAON

Tehsil : PATODI

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Name of Village

Mustil No.

Square Metre

Hadbast No.

9. DADAWAS ( Contd ...)

8/1

8/2

18/1

18/2

10. HAKDARPUR

21/1

21/2

22/1

14/2

16/1

16/2

25/1

10/2

7/1

712

14/1

4422 Gf 04 25 8820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART 11- SEC . 3( ii ) ] Tehsil : PATODI

District : GURGAON

State : HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

10. HAKDARPUR ( Contd ... )

23/1

23/2

25/2

21/1

21/2

1/1

6/1

6/2/1

6/2/2

17/1

17/2

24/1

24/2

73/2

105

107

18 11. SHERPUR

92 8821

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : HARYANA

District : GURGAON

Tehsil : PATODI

Area Name of Village

Hectare Are

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

11. SHERPUR (Contd ...)

14/2

15/1

7/1

7/2

8/1

14/1

23/1

23/2

23/3

23/1

23/2

2/1

2/2

3/1

9/1

9/2 8822

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] Tehsil : PATODI

District: GURGAON

State : HARYANA

Area Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

11. SHERPUR ( Contd... )

9/3

22/1

1/2

11/2

20/1

20/2

21/1

21/2

15/1

15/2

17/1

17/2

24/1

24/2

7/2

13/1

13/2

40 8823

नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

भारत का राजपत्र

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State: HARYANA

District : GURGAON

Tehsil : PATODI

Area

Are

Hectare

Name of Village

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

11. SHERPUR (Contd ...)

23/1

9/1

9/2

10/2

79/1

268

270

305

12. RAJPURA

2/1

2/2

10/1

11/2

12/1

20 882.1

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27. 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : PATODI

District : GURGAON

State : HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

12. RAJPURA ( Contd ...)

4/1/1

4/1/2

18/1

18/2

19/1

19/2

16/1

1/1

1/2

20/1

20/2

00 8825 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27. 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) |

State : HARYANA

District: GURGAON

Tehsil : PATODI

Area

Name of Village

Are

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

12. RAJPURA ( Contd ... )

174

[No. R- 31015/49/2004- O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3037. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इण्डस्टीज कम्पनी लिमिटेड के गोवा में उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश में संरचनाओ से महाराष्ट्र राज्य में ठाणे जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ। स्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपजाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधि। सूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिं में उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन) अधिध नियम् 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिध सूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस. डी. भिसे सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जी. टी.आई. सी. एल. पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना , प्लॉट नं० एस 13 , एच 13 से 15 तक , चौथा माला , भारत गैस गोडाठ न के सामने , लाल चौकी आघारवाडी रोड , कल्याण प जिला ठाणे पिनकोड 421301 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 8826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

अनुसूची

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक : तलासरी

जिल्हा: ठाणे

गाँव कानाम

राज्य: मुहाराष्ट्र

सर्वे नं / गट नं

2 1) वडवली

आर आय आजतुकर आयू आजतुकरन क लिए

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर

एर सिएर 3

5 00

गाव सीमा और सर्वे नं 161 के बीच में नदी

161

129/1/2

129/2/5

129/2/4

129/2/3

129/2/2

129/2/1

129/1/5

129/1/3

132

126/2ए

126/ 2वी

125/1

125/2

124/1

124/2

24 00

89 00

38 00

56 00

57 00

48 00

82 00

08 00

37 00

30 00

11 00

96 00

18 00

70 00

82 00

00 00

सर्वे नं 123 के बीच में रस्ता

123/1सी

123/1 ए

112

121

116/2/2

116/2/1

120/1बी

113/1

113/2

193

114/1

114/3

181/1

181/2

97 00

57 00

77 00

57 00

40 00

30 00

93 00

86 00

11 00

35 00

11 00

77 00

30 00

46 00

95 01

सर्वे नं 181 में रस्ता

38/1

35/1

86 00

77 00

45 8827

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

35/2

1) वडवली ( निरंतर )

35/3

35/5

35/6

182

179

33/1

2) ठाकरपाडा

38 00

30 00

12 00

सर्वे नं 86 में रस्ता

89/पी

2पी

7पी

10/1/10

10/1/16

8पी

14पी

3) सुतारपाडा

4) इभाडपाडा

सर्वे नं 66 में रस्ता

सर्वे नं 67 में रस्ता

61/7

61/8

61/9

61/11

61/15

61/16

61/19

61/20

61/21

58/1

56/2

18पी

20पी

3422 G1/04 26

55 00

49 00

82 00

63 00

12 00

68 00

17 00

31 00

53 00

25 00

84 00

46 00

45 00

01 00

92 00

51 00

00 8828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

17पी

4) इभाडपाडा ( निरंतर )

5) तलासरी

72पी

67/1

63/पी

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 3

27 00

04 01

96 00

88 00

45 00

74 00

46 00

69 00

सर्वे नं 57 और 56 के बिच में

57/पी

42/1

42/2

42/4

42/5

42/6

33 00

09 00

16 00

96 00

81 00

93 00

46 00

41 00

20 00

सर्वे नं 42 में रस्ता

44/1

44/2

49/1/1

49/1/2

49/1/3

173/4

6) वरवाडा

173/12

173/13

173/15

173/16

173/17

60पी

159

56पी

196

52पी

197

172

26 00

28 00

60 00

71 00

23 00

80 00

24 00

80 00

25 00

29 00

89 00

66 00

06 00

24 00

56 00

15 00

20 00

17 00

05 00

74 00

23 8829

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

156पी

6) वरवाडा ( निरंतर )

45/2

50/3

46/2

46/3

47/3

41/2/1

41/2/5

41/2/6

171/6

171/7

35/1

164

32/3ए

32/3बी

208

6/2

7/5

7/7

168पी

713

7) उफ्लाट

714

507/पी-203/ डब्ल्यू

1280

716

717

1276

725

1268

726

727

745

744

749

751

757

759

756

761

752

5 3

37 00

64 00

76 00

41 00

14 00

23 00

56 00

46 00

60 00

32 00

17 00

78 00

27 01

47 00

91 00

41 00

23 00

07 00

58 00

48 00

18 00

53 00

23 00

10 00 8830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

760

7) उफ्लाट ( निरंतर )

770

789

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00

41 00

10 00

सर्वे नं 772 में रस्ता

772

778

777

507

780

785

763

784

792

793

207पी

09 00

47 00

71 00

15 00

98 00

48 00

76 00

10 00

57 00

33 00

51 00

507/पी- डब्ल्यु-47

446

448

451

455

454

410

413

414

420

213

214

220/2

34 00

13 00

18 00

91 00

23 00

74 00

28 00

32 00

09 00

11 00

26 00

53 01

सर्वे नं 220 और 226 मे नाल्ला

226

227

229

230

237

239

235

238

255

254/1

320

94 00

58 00

86 00

51 00

39 00

62 00

72 00

सर्वे नं 320 मे रास्ता

96 8831

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

जिल्हा: ठाणे मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: कल्याण

5 3

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

43 00

गाव सीना और सर्वे नं 45 के बीच में नदी

1) वहागाव

45/1

56/1

56/3

56/4

56/5

56/6

56/7 एपी

61/8

26/1

2) आपटी

28/2

28/3

28/4

28/5

26/6पी

00 00

73 00

36 00

94 00

58 00

64 00

64-

32 00

47 00

45 00

सर्वे न 56 और गाव सीमा के बीच में नदी

17/3

17/7

3) मांजली

32/13

25/0पी

25/7

25/8

25/12

25/13

25/14

26/2

26/3

69/9

69/14

69/23

69/24

69/25

8/7

11/10

11/3

91 00

94 00

44 00

12 00

61 00

50 00

24 00

90 00

60 00

00 00

96 00

20 00

00 8832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 3) मांजी ( निरंतर

11/5

11/9

4) वाहोली

17/8/1

17/8/2

15/1

14/3

14/4पी

14/5

14/6

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

5 00

60 00

10 00

39 00

09 00

54 00

68 00

17 00

45 00

सर्वे नं 14 में रस्ता

10/1

10/4

10/5

10/6

8/1/1

8/1/3

8/2

7/4

7/6

7/7

108/1

108/2

107/2

107/3

112/3

112/4

112/5

112/6

112/7

112/9

114/1

114/2

114/3

114/4

114/5

114/6

111/8

111/9

111/10

113

115/3

116/1

61 00

87 00

60 00

61 00

20 00

10 00

40 00

54 00

23 00

16 00

44 00

94 00

37 00

00 00

97 00

89 00

82 8833

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

116/3

4) वाहोली ( निरंतर )

96/1पी

96/5

96/6

96/7

96/8

95/पी

92/1

92/2पी

55/4

5) गोवेली

53/3

53/5/1

53/5/2

53/6

53/7

52/2

52/3अ,ब

52/4

52/5

52/6/1

52/6/2+7

51/6

51/7

6) रेवती

39/2

42/बी

42/सी

12 00

22 00

81 00

19 00

34 00

54 00

53 00

14 00

53 00

सर्वे नं 42/सी और 21 के बीच में रस्ता

21/4

21/5

18/1

18/2

17/1पी

17/3पी

1/1

2/1

3/1

3/2

3/3

00 8834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

3/4

6) रेवती ( निरंतर )

3/8पी

3/9

10/1

10/2

10/4

10/5

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

51 00

13 00

47 00

42 00

29 00

01 00

सर्वे नं 10 में रस्ता

9/1

9/2

9/6

9/7

8/1

8/2

8/3

8/5/1पी

7) अनखर

28/1

28/2

28/3

28/4

28/5

28/6

28/7

32/6

32/7

32/8

46/1पी

75/30

74/2

80/1पी

80/2

80/5

77/1

77/2

77/3

77/4

79/1

81/1

61/2

83/ 1 क, 2कह 00

82 00

20 00

15 00

28 00

94 00

99 00

20 00

78 00

74 00

61 00

08 00

58 00

42 00

09 00

58 00

70 00

56 00

78 00

47 00

11 00

13 00

50 00

07 00

29 00

02 00

08 00

32 00

52 00

54 00

18 00

40 00

45 00

95 8835

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

83/1 ए

7) अपवार ( निरंतर )

8) बोटसई

सर्वे नं 35/1 में रस्ता

110/1पी

9) मसयाक

86/पी

10) टिटवाळा

सर्वे नं 66 में रस्ता

77/2

67/3

67/4

67/5

67/7

67/8

65/1

68/1

50/2पी

73/1

47/1 ए

47/1बी

47/2

47/4

सर्वे नं 46 में रस्ता

46/3

46/10

46/11

243

36/1पी

36/2

35/पी

26/2पी

30/1

30/2

27/2

235/1पी

235/2

3422 G1/ 04--27

64 00

61 00

99 01

03 00

64 00

19 00

24 00

60 00

93 00

50 00

63 00

92 00

04 00

26 00

50 00

80 00

30 00

51 00

94 00

04 00

00 8836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 10) टिटवाळा ( निरंतर )

सर्वे नं 235 और गाव सीमा के बीच में नदी 11) उतने

गाव सीमा और सर्वे नं 136 के बीच में नदी

136

80/2

81/2

65/पी

137

89/1पी

89/2

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

सर्वे नं 89 में रस्ता

140

144

96/1पी

98/3

96/8

12) गुरक्ली

61/1/2

61/2

61/11

62/1

62/2

62/3/1

62/3/2

62/4

63/1

63/4

63/5

63/7

68/3/1

68/3/2

68/3/3

68/4

68/13/1

68/13/2

68/13/3

१ 00

सर्वे नंऔरच में रेल्वे

3/3

3/4

3/8

40/4

40/6

60 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

4/2

12) गुरवली ( निरंतर )

4/3

4/4

4/8

39/1

39/4

39/5

39/6

39/7

39/9

38/3पी

37/1अ

37/1

36/1

36/2

सर्वे नं 39 और 36 के बिच में

34/1/3

34/2

34/3

34/4

29/1

29/2

29/3

29/4

29/5

18/1

19/1थ

19/1क

19/1g

19/2

20/3

20/4

सर्वे नं 20 और गांय सीमा के बीच में रस्त

84/1/2

13) निंबवली

84/2

84/3सी/पी

54/1

14) राया

54/2पी

54/8

54/9

54/10

46/5

8837

5 3

54 00

78 00

65 00

54 00

06 00

31 00

60 00

04 00

45 00

20 00

62 00

50 00

60 00

70 00

80 00

06 00

25 00

31 00

02 00

28 00

19 00

00 8838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA6 , 1926

2 14) राया ( निरंतर )

46/6

58/2

58/4

45/1

45/2

44/1पी

64/1

64/2

64/3

64/4

64/7

64/8

43/1पी

73/1

73/3

71/2

68/1

88/2

68/3

68/4

68/5

68/15

69/1

69/2

15) ओझली

22/1 पी

31/1

31/2

36/1

36/7

30/7

23/3

13/1पी

13/2

13/3

13/4

12/1

11/1 पी

10/1/1

10/1/2

10/2

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

5 00

90 00

76 00

54 00

28 00

83 00

18 00

84 00

68 00

16 00

15 00

87 00

10 00

25 00

28 00

10 00

89 00

87 00

93 00

87 00

10 00

80 00

73 00

94 00

19 00

23 00

06 00

29 00

10 00

35 00

47 00

40 00

52 00

82 00

18 00

45 00

98 00

17 00

30 00

53 00

21 00

15 00

14 8839 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8/2पी

15) ओइली ( निरंतर )

8/5

5/3पी

6/2पी

6/3पी

6/4

6/5वी

सर्वे नं 6 और गाव सीमा के बीच में नदी

[फा. सं. एल-14014/42/2004- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2004

S. O. 3037.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from exploration blocks in the Northern/ Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited, the promoter company of M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to various consumers of District Thane in the State of Maharashtra, a pipeline should be laid by M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipelines are proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of section (3 ) of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri S.D.Bhise, Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, Plot No.S - 13 , H- 13 to 15, 4th floor, Opp./ Bharat Gas Godown , Andharwadi Road, Lal Chowki , Kalyan (W), Pin code - 421301 .

8840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Schedule

Mandal /Thesil /Taluk : Talasari

District:Thane

Village

Survey No./Gat No.

2 1) Vadavali

River in bet. V.B & Svy.No. 161

161

129/1/2

129/2/5

129/2/4

129/2/3

129/2/2

129/2/1

129/1/5

129/1/3

132

126/2A

126/2B

125/1

125/2

124/1

124/2

State: Maharashtra

Aree te he acquired for Rou Hectare Are C-Are 3

5 00

24 00

89 00

38 00

56 00

57 00

48 00

82 00

08 00

37 00

30 00

11 00

96 00

18 00

70 00

82 00

00 00

66 00

Road in Bet Svy. No.123

123/1C

123/1A

112

121

116/2/2

116/2/1

120/1B

113/1

113/2

193

114/1

114/3

181/1

181/2

97 00

57 00

77 00

57 00

40 00

30 00

93 00

86 00

11 00

35 00

11 00

77 00

30 00

46 00

95 01

Road in Svy. No. 181

38/1

35/1

86 00

77 00

45 8841

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

35/2

1) Vadavali (Contd....)

35/3

35/5

35/6

182

179

33/1

2) Thakarpada

Road in Svy. No. 86

89/P

10/1/10

10//1/16

14P

3) Sutarpada

4) Ibhadpada

Road in Svy. No. 66

Road in Svy. No. 67

61/7

61/8

61/9

61/11

61/15

61/16

61/19

61/20

61/21

58/1

58/2

18P

20P

38 00

30 00

62 01

82 00

98 00

92 00

24 00

00 8842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA6 , 1926

17P

4) Ibhadpada ( Contd.... )

5) Talasan

72P

67/1

63/P

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 3

5 00

23 01

27 00

04 01

96 00

88 00

45 00

42 02

74 00

14 46 00

69 00

10 00

InBet Svy No. 57 & 56

57/P

42/1

42/2

42/4

42/5

42/6

33 00

09 00

16 00

96 00

81 00

06 304 00

93 00

46 00

41 00

20 00

Road in Svy No.42

44/1

44/2

49/1/1

49/1/2

49/1/3

(6) Varvada

173/4

173/12

173/13

173/15

173/16

173/17

60P

159

56P

196

52P

197

172

26 00

28 00

60 00

71 00

23 00

80 00

24 00

80 00

25 00

29 00

89 00

66 00

06 00

24 00

56 00

03 00

15 00

20 00

17 00

05 00

74 00

23 8843

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

156P

6)Varvada(Contd....)

45/2

50/3

46/2

46/3

47/3

41/2/1

41/2/5

41/2/6

171/6

171/7

35/1

164

32/3A

32/3B

208

6/2

7/5

168P

713

7)Uplat

714

5 3

37 00

04 00

64 00

32 00

45 00

23 00

56 00

32 00

80 00

35 00

507/P -203/W

1280

716

717

1276

725

1268

726

727

745

744

749

751

757

759

756

761

752

3422 G1/04 28

94 00

07 00

21 00

89 00

53 00

17 00

00 8844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

760

7) Uplat ( Contd.... )

770

769

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 3

5 00

41 00

86 00

Road in Svy. No. 772

772

778

777

507

780

785

783

784

792

793

207P

507/P-W-47

446

448

451

455

454

410

413

414

420

213

214

220/2

Nala In Bet Svy No 220 & 226

226

227

229

230

237

239

235

238

255

254/1

320

47 00

71 00

15 00

96 00

48 00

78 00

10 00

57 00

33 00

28 01

34 00

13 00

91 00

23 00

74 00

28 00

32 00

09 00

11 00

28 00

53 01

06 00

94 00

58 00

88 00

51 00

39 00

93 00

82 00

35 00

98 00

72 00

81 00

95 00

Road In Svy No. 320

96 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

Thane

District :

Mandal/Theeil /Taluk : Kalyan

1) Dahagaon

8845 3

5 State: Maharashtra

River In bet V.B & Svy. No. 45

45/1

56/1

56/3

56/4

56/5

56/6

56/7AP

61/8

28/1

2)Apti

28/2

28/3

28/4

28/5

28/6P

00 00

36 00

20 00

94 00

98 00

58 00

08 00

84 00

32 00

35 00

47 00

62 00

45 00

River in bet. Svy No. 56 & V.B

17/3

17/7

3)Manjarli

32/13

25/6P

25/7

25/8

25/12

25/13

25/14

26/2

26/3

69/9

69/14

69/23

69/24

69/25

8/7

11/10

11/3

91 00

12 00

94 00

44 00

12 00

90 00

20 00

22 00

14 00

24 00

00 00

20 00

40 00

09 8846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

11/5

3) Manjarli (Contd.... )

11/9

4)Vaholi

17/8/1

17/8/2

15/1

14/3

14/4P

14/5

14/6

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 3

5 00

60 00

10 00

39 00

09 00

54 00

68 00

17 00

45 00

20 00

Road in Svy. No. 14

10/1

10/4

10/5

10/6

8/1/1

8/1/3

8/2

7/4

7/6

717

108/1

108/2

107/2

107/3

112/3

112/4

112/5

112/6

112/7

112/9

114/1

114/2

114/3

114/4

114/5

114/6

111/8

111/9

111/10

113

115/3

116/1

61 00

60 00

61 00

20 00

10 00

40 00

54 00

16 00

44 00

94 00

37 00

00 00

97 00

89 00

03 00

65 00

16 00

44 00

27 00

64 00

41 00

23 00

18 00

57 00

62 00

16 00

10 00

67 00

79 00

82 8847

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

116/3

4) Vaholi ( Contd .... )

96/1F

96/5

96/6

96/7

96/8

95/P

92/1

92/2P

55/4

5) Goveli

53/3

53/5/1

53/5/2

53/6

53/7

52/2

52/3A,B

52/4

52/5

52/6/1

52/6/2+7

51/6

51/7

6) Revati

39/2

42/B

42/C

5 3

06 00

81 00

10 00

40 00

15 00

34 00

54 00

16 00

68 00

53 00

68 00

72 00

14 00

89 00

12 00

71 00

Road inbet. Svy. No. 42/C & 21

21/4

21/5

18/1

18/2

17/1P

17/3P

1/1

2/1

3/1

3/2

3/3

70 00

80 00

36 00

00.

27 00 8848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926

2 6) Revati (Contd.... )

3/4

3/8P

3/9

10/1

10/2

10/4

10/5

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

51 00

13 00

47 00

42 00

29 00

01 00

Road in Svy. No. 10

9/1

9/2

9/6

9/7

8/1

8/2

8/3

8/5/1P

7) Anakhar

28/1

28/2

28/3

28/4

28/5

28/6

28/7

32/6

32/7

32/8

46/1P

75/3A

74/2

80/1P

80/2

80/5

77/1

77/2

77/3

77/4

79/1

81/1

81/2

83/(1C, 2C) 00

62 00

20 00

15 00

28 00

94 00

99 00

20 00

78 00

74 00

61 00

08 00

56 00

42 00

09 00

58 00

35 00

70 00

56 00

78 00

47 00

11 00

13 00

50 00

37 00

07 00

29 00

02 00

44 00

08 00

52 00

95 8849

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

83/1A

7) Anakhar ( Contd....)

8) Ghotsai

Road in Svy No. 35/1

110/1P

3) Mhaskal

66/P

10) Titwala

Road in Svy No. 66

77/2

67/3

67/4

67/5

67/7

67/8

65/1

68/1

50/2P

73/1

47/1A

47/1B

47/2

47/4

Road in Svy No. 46

46/3

46/10

46/11

243

36/1P

36/2

35/P

26/2P

30/1

30/2

27/2

235/1P

235/2

00 00

64 00

65 01

10 00

64 00

12 00

24 00

20 00

92 00

04 00

26 00

50 00

12 00

15 00

30 00

17 00

66 00

94 00

66 00

10 00

00 8850

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926

2 10) Titwala ( Contd .... )

River in bet. Svy No. 235 & V.B.

11) Utane

Riverin bet . Svy. No. 136 & V. B.

136

80/2

81/2

85/P

137

89/1P

89/2

5 00

75 00

86 00

07 00

50 00

19 00

66 00

16 00

41 00

28 00

Road in Svy. No. 89

140

144

96/1P

96/3

96/8

12) Guravali

61/1/2

61/2

61/11

62/1

62/2

62/3/1

62/3/2

62/4

63/1

63/4

63/5

63/7

68/3/1

68/3/2

68/3/3

68/4

68/13/1

68/13/2

68/13/3

Railway in bet Svy . No. 68 & 3

3/3

3/4

3/8

40/4

40/6

06 00

85 00

87 00

51 00

35 00

93 00

36 00

35 00

63 00

07 00

14 00

57 00

11 00

85 00

34 00

06 00

10 00

53 00

71 00

22.

30 00

05 00

42 00

11 00

52 00

81 00

80 00

98 00

73 00

44 00

23 00

98 00

96 00

60 8851

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii)]

4/2

12) Guravali (Contd....)

4/3

4/4

4/8

39/1

39/4

39/5

39/6

39/7

39/9

38/3P

37/1A

37/1B

36/1

36/2

5 3

65 00

54 00

94 00

06 00

31 00

90 00

60 00

04 00

In Bet Svy.No 39 & 36

34/1/3

34/2

34/3

34/4

29/1

29/2

29/3

29/4

29/5

18/1

19/1B

19/1C

19/1D

19/2

20/3

20/4

20 00

61 00

50 00

80 00

97 00

80 00

10.

06 00

Road inbet Svy. No. 20 & V.B

84/1/2 13) Nimboli

84/2

84/3C/P

54/1

14) Raya

54/2P

54/8

54/9

54/10

46/5.

3422 G1/04-29

67.

00 8852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 14) Raya (Contd.... )

46/6

58/2

58/4

45/1

45/2

44/1P

64/1

64/2

64/3

64/4

64/7

64/8

43/1P

73/1

73/3

71/2

68/1

68/2

68/3

68/4

68/5

68/15

69/1

69/2

15) Ozharli

22/1P

31/1

31/2

36/1

36/7

30/7

23/3

13/1P

13/2

13/3

1344%

11/10

10/1/1

10/1/2

10/2

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)) 3

5 00

90 00

76 00

54 00

28 00

83 00

18 00

84 00

68 00

16 00

15 00

87 00

10 00

25 00

28 00

10 00

89 00

87 00

93 00

87 00

10 00

60 00

73 00

94 00

23 00

06 00

29 00

10 00

35 00

47 00

40 00

52 00

82 00

18 00

45 00

98 00

17 00

30 00

53 00

21 00

15 00

14 8853 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

8/2P

10 15) Ozharli (Contd....)

8/5

5/3P

6/2P

6/3P

6/4

6/5P

River inbet. Svy No. 6 &V.B

[F. No. L- 14014/42/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3038.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए जामनगर - भोपाल और काकीनाडा- हैदराबाद - गोवा पाइपलाइन को आपस में जोडने के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ । स्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और ख्। निज पाइपलाइन (भूमिं में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम् 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिधकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा (3) की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधि। कार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री ए. के. संघवी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जी. टी.आई. सी. एल . पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना , तीसरी मंजिल , एटलांटा टावर , इन्कलाब सोसायटी के सामने गुलबाई टेकरा , एलिसब्रिज राज्य को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । अहमदाबाद 380006 , गुजरात 8854

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

अनुसूची

जिलाः खेडा तालुका: नडियाद

राज्य: गुजरात De आर ओ यूओजत करने के लिए

क्षेत्रफल

आरे स्केरमी.

सर्वे नंबर

गांव कानाम

2 1

231

1. नवागाम

232

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं .232 और 233 के बीच में )

233

234

338

235

236

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं. 236 और 329 के बीच में )

329

328

326

327

366

323

365

367

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं . 367 और 412 के बीच में )

412

407

जिलाः खेडा तालुका: मातर

हेक्टर

5 3

49 00

91 00

08 00

72 00

44 00

40 00

14 00

23 00

75 00

20 00

52 00

91 00

राज्य: गुजरात आर ओ यू ओजत करने को लिए

क्षेत्रफल आरे स्केर मी.

सर्वे नंबर

गांव कानाम

2 1

425

1. सीहोलडी

424

430

नहर

(सर्वे नं . 430 और 424 के बीच में )

423

422

432

433

435

401

399

नाला

(सर्वे नं. 399 और 397 के बीच में )

397

396

393

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं . 393 और 443 के बीच में )

443

392

445

367

363

362

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं. 362 और 361 के बीच में )

हेक्टर

5 3

87 00

40 00

02 00

45 00

21 00

35 00

52 00

20 00 8855

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

361 सीहोलडी निरंतर..

360

80 00

(सरकारी जमीन तालाव )

359

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्व नं. 360 और 358 के बीच में )

358

457/य

455

457/अ

456

459

461/अ

(सर्वे नं . 461 /A और 465 के बीच में )

कच्चारास्ता

465

461/घ

463

05 00

25 00

(सर्वे नं. 463 और 487 के बीच में )

पक्की सङक

487

488

494

495

501/अ

501/य

500

502

504

503

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 503 और 506 के बीच में )

506

516

508

509

515

514

503 2. मलियातज

504

502

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं. 504 और 507 के बीच में )

507

506/1

508

534/1

(सर्वे नं. 534/1 और 534/2 के बीच में )

नाला

534/2

246/2 3.अलिन्द्रा

243/2

(सर्व नं . 243/2 और 243/1 के बीच में )

पक्की सडक

243/1

244

241

240

228

229

230

224

00 8856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 अलिन्द्रा निरंतर ..

223

213

214

180

216

179

178

177

176

174

139

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)) 3

5 00

25 00

55 00

04 00

00 00

44 00

12 00

10 00

74 00

40 00

(सरकारी जमीन नाला )

415

417

418

419

425

426

नाला

22 00

06 00

85 00

(सर्वे नं. 426 और 447 के बीच में )

447

446

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं. 446 और 711 के बीच में )

711

नाला

(सर्वे नं. 712और 876 के बीच में )

712

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्व नं . 712 और 876 के बीच में )

876

875

884

882

885

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 885 और 870 के बीच में )

870

836

857

855

854

837

839

838

827

826

816

817

812

810

807

814

813

806

801

800

799

पक्की सङक

(सर्व नं. 799 और986 के बीच में )

986

89 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 अलिन्द्रा निरंतर..

987

988 4. उंधेला

कच्चा रास्ता (गांव की हद और सर्व नं. 317 के बीच में)

317

318

319

314

323

322

324

396

8857

5 3

32 00

20 00

13 00

23 00

22 00

67 00

30 00

01 00

(सरकारी जमीन)

392

393

395

394

कच्चा रास्ता 00

49 00

48 00

(सर्वे नं. 394 और 498 के बीच में )

498

499

497

496

487

486

488

490

489

482

78 00

52 00

30 00

87 00

30 00

(सरकारी जमीन-तालाब )

कच्चा रास्ता 00

(सर्वे नं. 490 और 530 के बीच में )

नहर 00

(सर्वे नं. 482 और 531 के बीच में )

530

531

532

533

534

528

535

536

कच्चा रास्ता

63 00

09 00

05 00

06 00

26 00

51 00

(सर्वे नं . 528 और 602 के बीच में )

602

600

601

612

614

613

611

637

636

698

635

699

700

701

708

709

707

67 00

79 00

47 00

93 00

46 00

43 00

82 00

92 00

71 00

02 8858

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

706

उंधला निरंतर..

704

705

716

717

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्व नं. 716 और 733 के बीच में )

733

732

731

730

729

728

5. उंटाई

293

296

297

255/1

नाला

(सर्वे नं . 255/1 और 255/2 के बीच में )

255/2

256

253/1

221/1

252

251

223

224

222

31 00

29 00

16 00

45 00

19 00

50 00

71 00

13 00

51 00

58 00

33 00

69 00

87 00

18 00

54 00

90 00

99 00

10 00

(सरकारी जमीन डी.एल.बी.कमेटी)

226

कच्चा रास्ता

6. मातर

(गांव की हद और सर्व नं . 1025 के बीच में)

1025

1026

1027

1028

1029

1021

1035

1030

1036

नाला

(सर्व नं. 1036 और 1089 के बीच में )

1089

1087

1086

1085

नाला

(सर्व न. 1085 आर 1038 के बीच में )

1038

1039

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं . 1039 और 1072 के बीच में )

1072

1071

1073

1074

1075

नाला

(सर्व नं . 1075 और 1081 के बीच में )

1081

1079

50 00

84 00

20 00

95 00

05 00

13 00

61 00

22 00

14 00

37 00

14 00

36 00

23 00

94 00

87 00

59 00

35 00

50 00

90 8859

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

नाला

5 3

(सर्वे नं. 1079 और 1076 के बीच में )

मातर निरंतर ..

1076

1077

1078 (सरकारी जमीन-तालाब )

1062

नाला

72 00

97 00

33 00

36 00

(सर्वे नं. 1062 और 1117 के बीच में )

1117

1118

1119

1121

नहर

53 00

(सर्वे नं. 1121 और 1119 के बीच में )

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं. 1119 और गांव की हद के बीच में )

1321

पक्की सङक

96 00

(सर्वे नं. 1321 और 1322 के बीच में )

1322

1323

1326

1328

1327

कच्चारास्ता

88 00

53 00

(सर्वे नं. 1327 और 1416 के बीच में )

1416

1413

1433/अ

1436

1435

नहर

(सर्वे नं 1435 में)

1447

1449

1389

1386

1385

1382

1383

1377

1376

75 00

95 00

04 00

92 00

95 00

( सर्वे नं. 1376 और 1455 के बीच में )

पक्की सङक-एस.एच

1455

1454

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं. 1454 और 1467 के बीच में )

1467

1468

1473

1472

1471

1470

1478

1477

कच्चा रास्ता

40 00

20 00

(सर्वे नं. 1477 और 1489 के बीच में )

1489

1488/1

189

7. सोखडा

कच्चा रास्ता (गांव की हद और सर्वे नं . 193 के बीच में)

193

(सर्वे नं 193 में)

नहर .

3422 G1/04-30

15 00

00 8860

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 सोखडा निरंतर ..

197

198

225

226

227

228

229

पक्की सङक

5 00

25 00

96 00

45 00

75 00

34 00

52 00

(सर्वे नं . 228 और 229 के बीच में )

623

622

621

620

629

641

640

638

637

636

सरकारी-जमीन

25 00

46 00

95 00

83 00

51 00

48 00

(सर्वे नं. 636 और वात्रक नदी के बीच में )

नदी

(वात्रक नदी)

जिलाः खेडा तालुका: खेडा

14 00

राज्य: गुजरात

सर्वे नंबर

गांव कानाम

नदी

(वात्रक नदी) 1. हरियाला

192

कच्चा रास्ता

हेक्टर

क्षेत्रफल आरे स्केर मी.

5 00

52 00

03 00

(सर्व नं. 192 और 206 के बीच में )

206

205

207

210/1

पक्की सङक

39 00

27 00

(सर्वे नं. 210/1 और 210/2 के बीच में )

210/2

कच्चा रास्ता

96 00

(सर्वे नं . 210/2 और 349 के बीच में )

349

कच्चा रास्ता

54 00

(सर्वे नं . 349 और 350 के बीच में )

351

350

427

सरकारी-जमीन

428

429

450

449

430

448

447

कच्चा रास्ता

30 00

13 00

64 00

22 00

15 00

09 00

91 00

(सर्वे नं. 447 और 444 के बीच में )

444

445

475

474

कच्चा रास्ता

33 00

91 00

89 00

( सर्वे नं. 474 और 479 के बीच में )

8861

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

479

हरियाला निरंतर ..

482

518

483

505

504

507

60 15

(सर्वे नं. 507 और 658 के बीच में )

पक्की सङक

658

657

656

653

652

612/2

651

625/2

(सर्वे 625/2 और केनाल के बीच में)

कच्चा रास्ता

नहर

(सर्वे नं. 625/2 और 625/1 के बीच में )

625/1

626

627/1

628

630

631

(सर्वे नं . 631 और 632 के बीच में )

नाला

632

633

634

635

115

2. काजीपुरा

116

114

120

(सरकारी जमीन)

113

121/घ

नहर

(सर्वे नं. 121/B ओर 127 के बीच में )

127

112/अ

कच्चा रास्ता

-(सर्वे नं. 112/A ओर 129 के बीच में )

129

130

131

132

149

134

136/अ

136/ब

136/3

(सर्वे नं . 136/D और 136/ B के बीच में )

रास्ट्रीय मार्ग

136/क

137

855

3. गोभलज

856

857

00 8862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 गोभलज निरंतर..

858

707/2

867

866

868

873

869

कच्चारास्ता

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 3

5 00

40 00

05 00

50 00

16 00

96 00

39 00

(सर्वे नं. 869 और 871 के बीच में )

871

972

(गामतल)

971 (पी.डबल्यू.डी.)

973

(सरकारी जमीन)

नाला

07 00

87 00

52 00

97 00

(सर्वे नं. 973 में)

969

(पी.डबल्यू.डी. )

979

980

(सरकारी जमीन)

995

994

997

1002

1001

1003

1004

(सरकारी जमीन)

1005

(सरकारी जमीन)

1006

1008

1009

1016

1011

1014

1012

1013

987 (पी.डबल्यू.डी. )

1114

1117

1120

1119

1118

1127

1128 (सरकारी जमीन)

पक्की सङक

09 00

86 00

35 00

36 00

64 00

83 00

19 00

(सर्वे नं. 1128 और 1129 के बीच में )

1129 (सरकारी जमीन) 4. मलारप्रा

(सरकारी जमीन )

(सरकारी जमीन)

6/4

6/1

5. कनेरा

(सरकारी जमीन-गाचर )

(सरकारी जमीन-गांचर)

(सरकारी जमीन गांचर )

16 8863

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

कनेरा निरंतर..

105

109

110

124

111

123

112

122

114

113

118

117

135

कच्चा रास्ता

90 00

25 00

92 00

51 00

(सर्वे नं. 135 और 414के बीच में )

414

412

413

446

444

443

445

465

447

464

463

448

466

451

468

462

461

460

453

454

404

455

456

457

399

398

385

397

391

386

52 00

72 00

59 00

63 00

10 00

00 8864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[ PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] 1

5 कनेरा निरंतर ..

390

47 387

[फा. सं . एल-14014/35/2004-जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2004

S. O. 3038. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Natural Gas through an interconnection between Jamnagar Bhopal and Kakinada Hyderabad-Goa pipeline, a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user (ROU) in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub -section ( 1) of section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri A.K.Sanghavi , Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project, Atlanta Tower, 3rd Floor. Opp Inqulab Society, Gulbai Tekra, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad - 380 006, Gujarat .

8865

नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

भारत का राजपत्र [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

State : Gujarat

District : Kheda

Taluka : Nadiad

Survey No. Name ofthe Viliage

2 1

231

1. NAVAGAM

232

CartTrack

Area to be acquired for Ri Are Sq.Mtr.

Hectare

(Inbetween survey 232 & 233 )

233

234

338

235

236

CartTrack

(Inbetween survey 236 & 329 )

329

328

326

327

366

323

365

367

CartTrack

(Inbetween survey No 3678412)

412

407

State : Gujarat

District : Kheda

Taluka : Matar

SurveyNo.

Name ofthe Village

2 1

425

1. SIHOLDI

424

430

Canal

Area to be acquired for ROI Are Sq.Mtr .

Hectare

(Inbetween Survey No. 430 & 424)

423

422

432

433

435

401

399

Nala

(Inbetween Survey No. 399 & 397 )

397

396

393

CartTrack

(Inbetween Survey No. 393 & 443)

443

392

445

367

363

362

(In between Survey No. 362 & 361)

Cart Track 8866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 6, 1926

2 Siholdi Cont'd

361

360

359

[PART II-SEC , 3( ii ) ] 3

5 00

80 00

(Govt. Land - Pond)

CartTrack (In between Survey No. 360 & 358)

358

457/B

455

457/A

456

459

461/A

CartTrack (In between Survey No. 461 /A & 465)

465

461/B

463

Asphalted Road ( In between Survey No. 463 & 487)

487

488

494

495

501/A

501/B

500

502

504

503

CartTrack (Inbetween Survey No. 503 & 506)

506

516

508

509

515

514

2. MALIYATAJ

503

504

502

CartTrack

77 00

64 00

47 00

05 00

02 00

25 00

03 00

25 00

24 00

93 00

02 00

82 00

18 00

39 00

27 00

16 00

59 00

94 00

03 00

30 00

52 00

60 00

50 00

15 00

48 00

63 00

02 00

(Inbetween Survey No. 504 & 507)

507

506/1

508

534/1

Nala (Inbetween Survey No. 534/1 & 534/2 )

534/2

3.ALINDRA

246/2

243/2

Asphalted Road ( In between Survey No. 243/2 & 243/1)

243/1

244

241

240

228

229

230

224

16 8867

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

223

ALINDRA Cont'd...

213

214

180

216

179

178

177

176

174

(Govt. Land - NALA)

139

415

417

418

419

425

426

Nala

(Inbetween Survey No 4268447 )

447

446

CartTrack

(Inbetween Survey No. 446 & 711 )

711

Nala

(in between Survey No 712 & 876)

712

(In between Survey No. 712 & 876)

CartTrack

876

875

884

882

885

(In between Survey No. 885 & 870)

CartTrack

870

836

857

855

854

837

839

838

827

826

816

817

812

810

807

814

813

806

801

800

799

97.

Asphalted Road ( In between Survey No. 799 & 986)

986

3422 G1/04-31 8868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 ALINDRA Cont'd...

987

988

4. UNDHELA

CartTrack

317

(Inbetween VB & Survey No. 317)

318

319

314

323

322

324

396

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 3

5 00

32 00

80 00

20 00

34 00

13 00

23 00

22 00

67 00

30 00

(Govt. Land)

392

393

395

394

CartTrack (In between Survey No. 394 & 498)

498

499

497

496

487

486

488

490

489

482

01 00

20 00

49 00

48 00

87 00

03 00

78 00

52 00

77 00

15 00

52 00

(Govt. Land - Pond)

CartTrack

Canal

(In between Survey No. 490 & 530)

530

(inbetween Survey No.482 & 531 )

531

532

533

534

528

535

536

CartTrack

602

(Inbetween Survey No. 528 & 602)

600

601

612

614

613

611

637

636

698

635

699

700

701

708

709

707

71 8869

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

706

UNDHELA Cont'd

704

705

716

717

CartTrack

45 00

(Inbetween Survey No. 716 & 733)

733

732

731

730

729

728

293

5. UNTAI

296

297

255/1

Nala

99 00

(Inbetween Survey No. 255/1 & 255/2 )

255/2

256

253/1

221/1

252

251

223

224

222

69 00

(Govt . Land - D.L.B.Committee)

226

CartTrack

(In between VB & Survey No. 1025 )

6.MATAR

1025

1026

1027

1028

1029

1021

1035

1030

1036

Nala

(Inbetween Survey No.1036 &1089)

1089

1087

1086

1085

Nala

(Inbetween Survey No. 1085 & 1038)

1038

1039

CartTrack

(Inbetween Survey No. 1039 &1072)

1072

1071

1073

1074

1075

Nala

94 00

(Inbetween survey No. 1075 & 1081 )

1081

1079

00 8870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYAÑA 6, 1926

Nala

MATAR(Cont'd)

(In between Survey No.1079 &1076)

1076

1077

1078

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00

64 00

72 00

(Govt.Land-Talavadi )

1062

Nala

(In between survey No. 1062 & 1117)

1117

1118

1119

1121

Canal (In between Survey No. 1121 & 1119)

CartTrack (Inbetween survey No 1119 & VB )

1321

Asphalted Road ( In between survey No 1321 & 1322 )

1322

1323

1326

1328

1327

CartTrack ( In between survey No 1327 & 1416))

1416

1413

1433/A

1436

1435

Canal

77 00

33 00

36 00

71 00

34 00

28 00

53 00

71 00

43 00

09 00

96 00

88 00

28 00

67 00

53 00

67 00

53 00

21 00

75 00

95 00

04 00

(In Survey No.1435)

1447

1449

1389

1386

1385

1382

1383

1377

1376

State Highway ( In between survey No. 1376 & 1455)

1455

1454

CartTrack (In between Survey No.1454 & 1467)

1467

1468

1473/1

1472

1471

1470

1478

1477

CartTrack (Inbetween Survey No.1477 &1489)

1489

1488/1

7. SOKHADA

189

Cart Track

35 00

28 00

88 00

45 00

95 00

20 00

(In between VB Survey No. 193 )

193

Canal

(In Survey No. 193)

34 8871

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

197

SOKHADA ( Cont'd)

198

225

226

227

228

229

Asphalted Road ( Inbetween Survey No.228 & 229)

623

622

621

620

629

641

640

638

637

636

(In between Survey No. 636 & River)

Govt. Land

River (Vatrak River)

State : Gujarat

District : Kheda

Taluka : Kheda

Survey No. Nameofthe Village

2 1

River (Vatrak River) 1. HARIYALA

192

CartTrack

Sq.Mtr.

Area Are

Hectare

(Inbetween Survey No. 192 & 206)

206

205

207

210/1

(In between Survey No. 210/1 & 210/2 )

Asphalted Road

210/2

CartTrack

(Inbetween Survey No. 210/2 & 349)

349

CartTrack

(Inbetween Survey No. 349 & 350)

351

350

427

Govt. Land

428

429

450

449

430

448

447

(Inbetween Survey No. 447 & 444)

CartTrack

444

445

475

474

CartTrack

(Inbetween Survey No. 474 & 479 )

8872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 HARIYALA Cont'd

479

482

518

483

505

504

507

Asphalted Road ( In between Survey No. 507 & 658)

658

657

856

653

652

612/2

651

625/2

CartTrack (In between Survey No. 625/2 & Canal )

Canal

(In between Survey No. 625/2 & 625/1)

625/1

626

627/1

628

630

631

Nala

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] 3

5 00

31 00

60 00

75 00

10 00

90 00

08 00

61 00

30 00

76 00

84 00

02 00

79 00

37 00

15 00

43 00

26 00

80 00

79 00

65 00

12 00

86 00

(In between Survey No. 631 & 632)

632

633

634

635

2.KAJIPURA

115

116

114

120

113

(Govt. Land)

121/B

Canal

(Inbetween Survey No. 121B & 127)

127

112/A

CartTrack

(In between Survey No. 112/A & 129)

129

130

131

132

149

134

136A

136B

136D

National Highway ( In between Survey No. 136D & 136B)

136C

137

3. GOBHLAJ

855

856

857

05 8873

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

858

GOBHLAJ Cont'd

707/2

867

866

868

873

869

CartTrack

(Inbetween Survey No. 869 & 871 )

871

972

(VillageSite)

971

(P.W.D.)

973

(Govt. Land)

(In Survey No. 973 )

Drain

969

(P.W.D.)

979

(Govt. Land)

980

995

994

997

1002

1001

1003

1004 (Govt. Land)

1005 (Govt. Land)

1006

1008

1009

1016

1011

1014

1012

1013

(P.W.D.)

987

1114

1117

1120

1119

1118

1127

1128

(Govt. Land)

Asphalted Road (Inbetween survey No. 1128 & 1129)

1129

(Govt. Land)

4.MALARPURA

(Govt.Land)

(Govt. Land)

6/4

6/1

(Govt. Land-Goucher )

5. KANERA

(Govt. Land Goucher )

(Govt. Land Goucher)

00 8874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 KANERA Cont'd

105

109

110

124

111

123

112

122

114

113

118

117

135

CartTrack

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

50 00

32 00

61 00

07 00

46 00

34 00

24 00

47 00

90 00

28 00

25 00

92 00

60 00

59 00

(Inbetween survey No.135 & 414)

414

412

413

446

444

443

445

465

447

464

463

448

466

451

468

462

461

460

453

454

404

455

456

457

399

398

385

397

84 8875 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

69 391

47 386

77 390

387

[F. No. L-14014/35/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर , 2004

का. आ. 3039.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफास्टक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इण्डस्ट्रीज कम्पनी लिमिटेड के गोवा में उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश में संरचनाओ से महाराष्ट्र राज्य में ठाणे जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ। स्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपजाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अध्धि सूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिधकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिं में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधि। नियम् 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई अधि। सूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस . डी. भिसे सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जी. टी.आई. सी. एल . पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना , प्लॉट नं 0 एस 13 , एच 13 से 15 तक , चौथा माला , भारत गैस गोडाऊन के सामने , लाल चौकी आधारवाडी रोड , कल्याण प जिला ठाणे पिनकोड 421301 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा 1 3422 G1/04 32 8876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) )

अनुसूची

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक : विक्रमगड

जिल्हा: ठाणे

गाँव का नाम

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

सर्वे नं / गट नं

2 1 ) कुझे

गाव सीमा और गट नं . 553 के बीच में नदी

553पी

554

563/पी

563पी/1

568

573/1पी

573/1 पी

573/1पी

578

579

584पी

586

588

589

590

आरआयू आजत करन क हेक्टर

एर

सिएर 3

5 00

73 00

53 00

47 00

00 00

70 00

49 00

50 00

64 00

45 00

80 00

53 00

79 00

91 00

20 00

93 00

23 00

गट नं . 590 में रस्ता

593

639

642

641

640

638

632

631

633

28/पी

गट नं . 30 और गाव सीमा के बीच का नाला 2) म्हसरोली

गाव सीमा और गट नं . 131/9 के बीच में नाला

131/9

131/12

17पी

29पी

98पी

118

20/2

108/2

108/3

16पी

130/1

107

130/2

115

39 00

31 00

49 00

81 00

01 00

15 00

17 00

26 00

63 00

16 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

4/76 3)शिळ

4) भोपोली

105

103

104

गट नं . 97 में रस्ता

80/बी

81और डब्ल्यु/2

99 5) तळवली

104

गट नं . 104 में रस्ता

106

107

108

109

114

110

111

112

113

121

151/4ए 6) कोंडगाव

16/1

8877

00 8878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 6) कोंडगाव ( निरंतर )

131/पी

96पी

130/3

130/5

130/6

107/पी

106

105

110

112पी

112 पी

113

157

128/6

70/1पी

70/2

155

115/पी

63/3

142

127पी

61/1

61/2

61/3

पाडा

57/1

57/ 2पी

123पी

गट नं . 123 में रस्ता

150/4ए-3 डब्ल्यु

150/4ए-4 डब्ल्यु

गट नं.4 डब्ल्यूमें नाला 7)विळशेत

25/4

4/3

4/5

4/6

4/7

5/1

5/2

5/3

42/2

42/3

42/5

42/6

[PART 11-SC. 3( ii) ] 3

5 01

86 00

02 00

18 00

73 00

64 00

45 00

87 00

42 00

19 00

59 00

25 00

00 00

09 00

11 00

68 00

50 00

70 00

18 00

93 00

14 00

15 00

84 00

10 00

64 00

77 00

89 00

10 00

97 00

61 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii )]

2 1

7) विळशेत ( निरंतर )

सर्वे नंबर 47 बीच में नाला

60/1

12ए

12बी

जिल्हा: ठाणे मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: वाडा

1) मेट

22पी

25/सी

25/डी

25/

147/बी

2) घोणसई

147/1

गट नं . 147 और 171 के बीच में राजमार्ग 35

171

145/ए

177

176

175

141

140

138

142/पी

गट नं. 138 और 83 के बीच में नाला

85/ए

85/बी

87/

509/बी

8879

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

00 8880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 2) घोणसई ( निरंतर )

509/ए

508

3) मुसारणे

526

535

536

539/बी

539/ए

543

544

545

551

552

550

549

553

554

555

459

556

447

446

445

444

441

440

439

438

562

563

385

328

327

322

324

256

255

254

71/बी

250

221

224

223

227

222

220

216/डी

216/सी

216/बी

219

216/ए

217/ए

218

214/ए

213

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

56 00

61 00

26 00

54 00

84 00

18 00

10 00

95 00

84 00

38 00

10 00

18 00

14 00

48 00

55 00

82 00

02 00

55 00

51 00

94 00

25 00

47 00

60 00

79 00

50 00

83 00

46 00

30 00

66 00

73 00

40 00

56 00

35 00

17 00

30 00

88 00

83 00

78 00

64 00

37 00

54 00

53 00

09 00

07 00

13 00

41 00

26 00

98 00

81 00

93 00

68 00

69 8881

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

201

212

3) मुसारणे ( निरंतर )

203

202

178

166

4) चिंचघर

161

203

216

217

220

221

222

212/सी

258/ए

260

261

262

263

285

308

13/1

11/2 5) विजयगड

10/7

10/4

10/1

10/2

5/10

5/11

5/12

5/9

5/5

5/3/1

5/1

5/2/1

गट नं .5 और 6 के बीच में रस्ता

6/14/1

6/12

6/7/1

6/6

6/4

गट नं .6/6 और गाव सीमा के बीच में गाडी रस्ता

4/3

4/2

4/1 .

15/8

15/7अ 6) डॉगस्ते

15/7क

15/5

15/1अ+4 00

सर्वे नं . 15/1 और 14/15 के बीच में नाला

14/15

14/14

14/9अ

14/9थ

00 8882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 6) डॉगस्ते ( निरंतर )

14/8

14/2/1

3/1

3/136

3/7

3/9

3/11अ

3/11ब

3/115

3/11 ई

3/5अ

3/5थ

3/5क

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] 3

5 00

58 00

81 00

73 00

10 00

20 00

06 00

04 00

08 00

00 00

92 00

88 00

32 00

सर्वे नं . 3/5 और 4/6 के बीच में नास्ला

4/6

4/4

5/8

5/6

5/5

5/4

37/6

5/3

5/2व

5/2क

5/1

36/1ए

34/14

00 00

80 00

17 00

19 00

64 00

63 00

00 00

सर्वे नं 34/14 और 35/6 के बीच में रस्ता

35/6

35/9

35/4

35/5

35/3

7) बिलावली

196

195

197

194

187

186

184

183

181

208

202

203/बी

206

205

204

237

239/बी

238

249ए

250

251

255

256

349

नरतर भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

254

352 7) बिलावली ( निरंतर )

351

350

348

345

346

357

358

355

368

370

371

372

417

420

421

422

424

423

431

440

437

438

439

441

443

444

445

447ए

448

449

461

469

466

468

465/ए

465/सी

464/ए

463

481

480

479/2

494

764/1 पी 8)विलोशी

776/1पी

20/1

19/सी

19/

13/2

60 3422 G1/04 33

8883

00 8884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27. 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

2 8 ) बिलोशी ( निरंतर) )

PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) | 3

गट नं . 63 और 64 के बीच में रस्ता

138

193

151

140

155

158

157

160

159

191

161

169

190

182

251

253

256

254

257

258

281

259

306

305

307

308

304

361

366

365

367

9) खानियली

109

106

107

113

115

105

138

135

137

159

158

157

200

199

196

197

40 00

12 00

13 00

98 00

10 00

15 00

40 00

00 00

36 00

32 00

56 00

64 00

10 00

66 00

10 00

72 00

67 00

30 00

50 00.

23 00

80 00

21 00

39 00

57 00

03 00

55 00

28 00

26 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

196

9) खानिवली ( निरंतर )

212

211

210

209

222

218

217

213

219

166

10) अविस्ते बु

187

गाव सीमा और गट नं . 167 के बीच में रस्ता

185

166

189/ए

189/बी

193

163

194

197

196

251

250

247

253

246

245

244

243

242

321

322

325

324

323

320

329

471

470

460

गट नं . 458 और 461 के बीच में राजमार्ग 34

461

462

463

455

458

454

452

450

519

81 11 ) अबिस्ते खु.

8885

00 8886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 11 ) अविस्ते खु. ( निरंतर )

74ए

103

104

132

131

130

129

137

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

42 00

21 00

02 00

97 00

28 00

27 00

87 00

69 00

66 00

11 00

गाव सीमा और गट नं. 137 के बीच में नदी

12) खरीवली

गाव सीमा और सर्वे नं . 137 के बीच में नदी

137

142

139

143

144

117

64 00

16 00

29 00

58 00

98 00

30 00

69 00

सर्वे नं 117 और 98 के बीच में

113

99/1

99/2

105

75/1

76/3

57/3

55/4

56/3/2

56/6अ

266/1

266/3

265

264

सर्वे नं 267 में रस्ता

267

286/3

286/4

287/2

328/3

328/5

290/1

290/2

327/1

327/2

3/2

3/4

3/5

3/6

3/10

3/9

4/1

5/1

5/3

86 00

03 00

79 00

50 00

51 8887

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

5/4पी

12) खरीक्ली ( निरंतर )

320/10

13) भोपीवली

64/पी

211

210

212

209

14) मांडे

सर्वे नं 31 में रस्ता

सर्वे नं 31 और 43 के बीच में नाला

61/1

146पी 15) कळम खांड

150

149 00

00 8888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 15) कळम खांड ( निरंतर )

153/ए

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

सर्वे नं 153 में राजमार्ग 35

सर्वे नं 153 में रस्ता

170

189

174

175

40 00

07 00

87 00

88 00

सर्व्हे नं 169 और 175 के बीच में रस्ता

179

178

177

186

187

188

190

191

192

197पी

238

193

194

195

231

196

16) सुर्योडा

79/बी

75/ए

75/बी

72/ए

67/बी

141

गट नं . 141 में रस्ता

198

145/बी

83 00

24 00

20 00

95 00

99 00

92 00

14 00

09 00

00 00

44 00

31 00

38 00

37 00

26 00

86 00

10 00

64 00

18 00

गट नं . 198 के बीच में नाला

176

173

172

177

178

170

गट नं . 170 में रस्ता

169

167

166

223

222/बी

221

17) ब्राम्हणगाव

96 8889 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

5 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

गट नं . 57 में रस्ता

17 ) क्रणगाव ( निरंतर )

35.

26बी

27/

27/बी

21/सी

22सी

20/सी

20/बी

19/सी

20/

21/ए

गट नं .20 और गाय सीमा के बीच की नदी

[फा. सं . एल -14014/41/2004-जी.पी. ]

एस . बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2004

S. O. 3039.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from exploration blocks in the Northern/ Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited , the promoter company of M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, to various consumers of District Thane in the State of Maharashtra, a pipeline should be laid by M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipelines are proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India under sub - section ( 1 ) of section (3 ) of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri S.D.Bhise,Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, Plot No.S - 13 , H- 13 to 15, 4th floor, Opp./ Bharat Gas Godown, Andharwadi Road , Lal Chowki , Kalyan (W) , Pin code - 421301.

8890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

Schedule

Mandal /Thesil /Taluk : Vikramgad

District : Thane Village

Survey No./GatNo.

2 1) Kurze

River in bet. V.B. & Gat No. 553

553P

554

563/P

563P/1

568

573/_1P

573/1P

573_/1P

578

579

584P

586

588

589

590

State:

Maharashtra

Jiren for be acquma

Hectare Are

C-Are 3

Road in Gat No.590

593

639

642

641

640

638

632

631

633

28/P

2)Mhasaroli

Nala inbet. Gat No.30 & V. B. 00

Nala in bet. V.B. & Gat No.131/9

131/9

131/12

17P

29P

98P

118

20/2

108/2

108/3

16P

130/1

107

130/2

115

A 00

16 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii )]

2 1

4A/76

3) Shil

4)Bhopoli

105

103

104

Road in Gat No.97

80/B

81 & W/2

5) Talavali

104

Road in Gat No. 104

106

107

108

109

114

110

111

112

113

121

3422 G1/04-34

8891

5 3

76 02

38 00

10 00

57 00

90 00

49 00

67 00

01 00

96 00

10 00

11 00

17 00

82 00

54 00

48 00

04 00

45 00

00 00

78 00

08 00

07 00

46 00

04 00 8892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926

151/4A

6) Kondgaon

16/1

131/P

96P

130/3

130/5

130/6

107/ P

106

105

110

112P

113

157

128/8

70/1P

70/2

155

115/P

63/3

142

127P

61/1

61/2

81/3

Pada

57/1

57/2P

123P

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

49 00

15 01

86 00

02 00

18 00

73 00

64 00

45 00

87 00

42 00

19 00

59 00

25 00

09 00

11 00

68 00

50 00

70 00

18 00

93 00

14 00

15 00

84 00

10 00

64 00

77 00

89 00

10 00

97 00

17 00

86 00

85 00

28 00

Road in Gat No. 123

150/4A- 3W

150/4A-4W

Nala in Gat No. 4W

7) Vilshet

25/4

4/3

4/5

4/6

27 00

47 00

66 00

90 00

17 00

65 00

83 00

10 00

63 00

24 00

60 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

5/1

7) Vilshet (Contd.... )

5/2

5/3

42/2

42/3

42/5

42/6

Nala in Svy.No.47

60/1

12A

12B

District :Thane Mandal /Thesil /Taluk :Wada

1)Met

22P

25/C

25/D

25/E

147/B 2) Ghonsai

147 /A1

8893

State: Maharashtra

Road SH-35 in bet . Gat No. 147 &

171

145/A

177

176

175

141

140

138

142/P

Nala inbet. Gat No. 138 & 83

85/A

85/B

87/A

00 8894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

2 2) Ghonsai (Contd....)

509/B

509/A

508

3) Musame

526

535

536

539/B

539/A

543

544

545

551

552

550

549

553

554

555

459

556

447

446

445

444

441

440

439

438

562

563

385

328

327

322

324

256

255

254

71/B

250

221

224

223

227

222

220

216/D

216/C

216/B

219

216/A

[ PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

06 00

18 00

80 00

01 00

57 00

38 00

56 00

61 00

26 00

54 00

84 00

18 00

10 00

84 00

10 00

18 00

14 00

48 00

55 00

82 00

02 00

55 00

51 00

94 00

25 00

47 00

79 00

50 00

83 00

46 00

30 00

66 00

73 00

40 00

56 00

35 00

17 00

30 00

88 00

83 00

78 00

64 00

37 00

54 00

53 00

07 00

13 00

41 00

98 00

81 00

93 00

68 00

57 00

47 8895

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

217 /A

3)Musame (Contd.... )

218

214/A

213

201

212

203

202

178

4) Chinchaghar

186

181

203

216

217

220

221

222

212/C

258/A

260

261

262

263

265

308

13/1

5)Vijayagad

11/2

10/7

10/4

10/1

10/2

5/10

5/11

5/12

5/9

5/5

5/3/1

5/1

5/2/1

5 3

93 00

37 00

21 00

80 00

Road inbet. Gat No. 5 & 6

6/14/1

6/12

6/7/1

6/6

6/4

CartTrack in bet. Gat No. 6/6 &

V.B

4/3

4/2

4/1

15/8 6)Dongaste

15/7A

15/7C

15/5

15/1A+4

Road inbet . Svy . No. 15/1 &

14/15

49 00

97 00

00 8896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

14/14

6) Dongaste(Contd....)

14/9A

14/9B

14/8

14/2/1

3/1

3/13C

3/7

3/9

3/11A

3/11B

3/11D

3/11E

3/5A

3/5B

3/5C

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

95 00

24 00

58 00

81 00

73 00

10- 00

20 00

06 00

04 00

08 00

00 00

92 00

88 00

32 00

50 00

Nala in bet. Svy. No. 3/5 & 4/6

4/6

4/4

5/8

5/6

5/5

5/4

37/6

5/3

5/2B

5/2C

5/1

36/1A

34/14

00 00

80 00

17 00

19 00

64 00

63 00

00 00

14 00

16 00

12 00

10 00

17 00

56 00

80 00 88

Road inbet. Svy. No. 34/14 &

35/6

35/9

35/4

35/5

35/3

7) Bilavali

196

195

197

194

187

186

184

183

181

208

202

203/B

206

205

204

237

239/B

238

249A

250

32 00

72 00

02 00

33 00

37 00

30 00

58 00

19 00

40 00

80 00

15 00

99 00

32 00

08 00

05 00

56 00

15 00

30 00

28 00

17 00

38 00 00 888 00

25 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

251

7) Bilavali (Contd.... )

255

256

349

254

352

351

350

348

345

346

357

358

355

368

370

371

372

417

420

421

422

424

423

431

440

437

438

439

441

443

444

445

447A

448

449

461

469

466

468

465/A

465/C

464/A

463

481

480

479/2

494

764/1P 8) Biloshi

776P

20/1

19/C

19/A

13/2

8897

5 3

99 00

11-

00 8898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA6 , 1926

8) Biloshi (Contd.... )

Road inbet . Gat No. 63 & 64

136

138

193

151

140

155

156

157

160

159

191

161

189

190

182

251

253

256

254

257

258

261

259

306

305

307

308

304

361

368

365

367

9) Khanivali

109

108

107

113

115

105

136

135

137

159

158

157

PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00

89 00

08 00

24 00

31 00

40 00

12 00

13 00

98 00

10 00

15 00

40 00

00 00

36 00

32 00

56 00

64 00

10 00

66 00

72 00

87 00

30 00

50 00

23 00

80 00

21 00

57 00

03 00

55 00

84 00

28 00

00 00

71 00

20 00

10 00

20 00

59 00

93 00

49 00

81 00

35 00

62 00

04 00

48 00

24 00

74 00

17 00

01 00

72 00

20 00

68 00

07 00

74 00

44 00

76 00

13 भारत का राजपत्र नव पर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

200

9) Khanivali (Contd....)

199

198

197

196

212

211

210

209

222

218

217

213

219

186

10) Ambiste-Bk

187

Road inbet. V.B & Gat No. 187

185

188

189/A

189/B

193

163

194

197

198

251

250

247

253

246

245

244

243

242

321

322

325

324

323

320

329

471

470

460

8899

59 13

Road SH 34 in bet . Gat No. 458

&461

461

462

463

455

458

454

452

450

519 3422G1/04-35

00 8900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

2 11) Ambiste-Kd

74A

103

104

132

131

130

129

137

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00

10 00

38 00

20 00

82 00

23 00

42 00

21 00

02 00

97 00

28 00

27 00

87 00

69 00

66 00

11 00

River in bet. Gat No. 137 & V.B

12) Kharivali

River in bet . V.B. & Svy. No. 137

137

142

139

143

144

117

64 00

16 00

29 00

58 00

98 00

30 00

69 00

In Bet.Svy. No. 117 & 98

113

99/1

99/2

105

75/1

76/3

57/3

55/4

56/3/2

56/6A

266/1

266/3

265

264

86 00

03 00

79 00

50 00

74 00

12 00

Road in Svy. No. 267

267

286/3

286/4

287/2

328/3

328/5

290/1

290/2

327/1

327/2

3/2

3/4

3/5

20 8901

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

3/6

12) Kharivali (Contd....)

3/10

3/9

4/1

5/1

5/3

5/4P

320/10

13) Bhopivali

64/P

211

210

212

209

14) Mande

00.

Road in Svy No 31

Nala in bet. Svy. No. 31 &43

61/1

00 8902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

14) Mande(Contd.... )

15) Kalamkhand

146P

150

149

153/A

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

32 00

75 00

86 00

31 00

74 00

SH -35 in Svy.No. 153

Road in Svy.No. 153

170

169

174

175

40 00

07 00

87 00

88 00

Road inSvy. No. 169 & 175

179

178

177

186

187

188

190

191

192

197P

238

193

194

195

231

196

16) Suponda

79/P

75/A

75/B

72/A

67/B

141

63 00

24 00

20 00

95 00

99 00

92 00

14 00

09 00

00 00

44 00

31 00

38 00

37 00

26 00

86 00

10 00

64 00

18 00

58 00

10 00

84 00

Road in Gat No.141

198

145/B

Nala in Gat No. 198

176

173

172

177

178

170

Road in GatNo.170

169

167

166

223

222/B

221

niin .

8903

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

17) Brahmangaon

Road inGat No.57

26B

27/A

27/B

21/C

22C

20/C

20/B

19/C

20/A

21/A

River in bet. Gat No. 20 & V.B

[F. No. L-14014/41/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3040.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री राम करण शर्मा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान संख्या -1418 , सेक्टर 6, बहादुरगढ़ - 124507 , जिला - झज्जर (हरियाणा) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज 8904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

अनुसुची

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा माँव का नाम

श्रत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा /किला संख्या हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्गमीटर 1. जैतहावास

143

1/2

3/1

11/2

6/1

6/2

15/1

15/2

172

267

85 8905 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

125

145

2. भाडावास

126

19/1

19/2

19/3

20/2

128

6/1

13/1

13/2

18/2

129

138

6/2

8/1

13 8906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA6 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाः रेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा

गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसविल संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

वर्गमीटर 2. भाडावास (जारी...)

145

138

14/1

22/1

139

144

145

5/1

5/2

6/1

6/2

7/1

7/2

13/1

13/2

18/1

18/2

23/1

147

148

1/1

1/2

90 8907 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

148

145

2. भाडावास (जारी... )

246

613

619

624

625

637

21/2/1

150

3.भवाड़ी

17/1

18/1

18/2

24/3

25/1

25/2/1

2/1

3/1

6/1

7/1

8/2

9/1

12/1

13/1

13/2

14/1

3422 GI/04-16 8908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) | तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा

गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हेक्टेयर

स्थसरा/किला संख्या

एयर वर्गमीटर 3. भवाड़ी (जारी... )

150

14/2

16/2

16/3

17/1

25/1

21/1

21/2/1

1/1

77/1

77/2

73 4.कमालपुर

152

21/1

21/2

16/1

16/2

22/3

23/1/2

66 8909

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

श्रेत्रफल

वर्गमीटर गाँव का नाम

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

0005

23/2/1

152

10 4. कमालपुर (जारी...)

12/1

12/2

19/1

19/2

21/1

3/1

3/2

155/1

157

5. छुरियावास

1/2/2

3/1

10/1/1 8910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii )] तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा गाँव का माम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/किला संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 5. छुरियावास (वारी... )

157

10/1/2

10/2/1

10/2/2

11/1/2

21/1

21/2

22/1

23/1

23/2

6/1

7/1

7/2

21/1

21/2

02 8911

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

क्षेत्रफल माँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

157

5. छुरियावास (जारी...)

2/1

2/2

12/2

18/2

25/1

25/2

00.

150

159

160

155

6.धामलाका 8912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )) तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

एयर वर्गमीटर 6. धामलाका (जारी... )

155

23/2

24/1

24/2

11/2

11/3

20/2

21/1

15/2

16/1

16/2

75 7. शहबाजपुर खालसा

171

20/1

15 8913 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

20/2

171

7. शहबाजपुर खालसा (जारी...)

00.

21/1

21/2

25/2

24/2

24/3

5/2/2

6/1

6/2

13/1

13/2

19/1

19/2

20/1

20/2

1/1

1/2

1/3

2/1

2/2

3/1

4/2

5 8914

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926 [ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यःहरियाणा

गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/किला संख्या हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्गमीटर 7. शहबाजपुर खालसा (जारी... )

171

7/1

7/2

8/1

8/2

9/1

9/2

4/1

4/2

5/1

16/1

16/2

00.

35/2

19 नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

भारत का राजपत्र

8915 :

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

171

7. शहबाजपुर खालसा (जारी...)

271

8. बैरियावास

3/1

170

3/2

8/1

8/2

3422 GI/04--37 8916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा

गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

हेक्टेयर

मुसतिल संख्या

एयर वर्गमीटर

खसरा/किला संख्या

8. वैरिवावास (जारी ...)

170

12/1/1

12/1/2

12/2

12/3

13/1

13/2

22/1

98 9. माजरा मुरदास

188

21/1

15/1

15/2

19/1

22/1

1/1

1/2

48 8917

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

माव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

188

9. माजरा मुरदास (जारी)

174

10. कोनसीवास

17/1

17/2

12/1

12/2

177

11. कालाका

23/1

23/2

2/1

2/2 8918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यःहरियाणा गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हेक्टेयर

खसरा /किला संख्या

एयर वर्गमीटर 11. कालाका (जारी ... )

177

3/2

11/2

12/1

12/2

20/2

20/1

21/1

21/2

61/1

50 12.मर्माडियाँ कलां

178

11/2

12/1

12/2

6/1

95 8919

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का बाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

संख्या मुसतिल खसरा/किला संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

01 12. मांडिया कलां (जारी...)

6/2

178

24/1

24/2

12/1

19/1

19/2

19/3

*00

00 8920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/किला संख्या

12. मांडिया कलां (जारी ... )

178

156

157

81 13. खलीलपुरी

11.

179

21/2

10/1

10/2

6/1

15/3

24/1

25/1

25/2

4/1

4/2

5/1

7/1/1

7/1/2

7/2/1

7/2/2

8/1/2

14/1

51/1

00 8921 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का बाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

गुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

179

13. खलीलपुरी (जारी ... )

65/1

180

14. माजरा श्यौराज

15/1

15/2

4/1

9/1

13/1

204

15. फिदेडी

1/2

10/1

16/1

16/2

25 8922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यःहरियाणा

माँव का बाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/किला संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 15. फिदेडी (जारी ... )

204

1/1

1/2

16/1

16/2

7/1

7/2

8/1

14/1

19/1

22/1

22/3

23/1

1/1

2/1

63 8923 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का माम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

2/2

204

15. फिदेही (जारी... )

11/2

20/1

20/2

25/1

25/2

13/2

17/2

17/3

7/1

7/2

3422 G1/04-38 8924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा गाँव का बाम

क्षेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा/किला संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 15. फिदेही (बारी... )

204

161

162

166

00.

167

01 16. बुडावी

208

23/1

23/2

3/1

3/2

3/3

3/4

9/2

80 8925 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

क्षेत्रफल

माँव का बाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

208

86 16. बुडानी (जारी... )

25/2

209

17. राममढ़

5/1

5/2

5/3

6/1

6/2

14/2

17/1

17/2

25/1

25/2

4/1

4/2

5/1

5/2

7/1

7/2

14/1

14/2

15 8926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

== तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा /किला संख्या

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्गमीटर 17. रामगढ़ (जारी ... )

209

17/1

7/1

186

192

18. डावड़ी

5/1

6/2

15/1

16/2

19. मोकलपुर

211

19/1/3

19/2

20/1/1

20/2/1

21/1/1

21/1/2

ου

21/2

22/1

6/2/1

15/2

16/1

16/2

25/1

08 8927 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

1/1

211

95 19. मोकलपुर (जारी... )

1/2/1

10/1/3

10/2

20/3

5/1

6/1

15/1

16/1/2

16/2/2

25/1

5/1

6/2

15/1

16/2

25/1

5/1

324

334

212

20. जांटी

7/1

18/2

23/1

3/1 8928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा

गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/किला संख्या

एयर वर्गमीटर 20. बांटी (जारी... )

212

9/2

12/1

19/3

21. जाट सायरवास

213

2/2

3/1

3/2

12/1

12/2

19/1

19/2

15/3

16/1

25/3

1/3

1 8929 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

श्रेत्रफल

तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

गाँव का नाम

खसरा/किला संख्या

संख्या मुसतिल

हदबस्त संख्या

10/1

213

21. जांट सायरवास (जारी ... )

10/2

4/3

5/2

7/1

7/2

7/3

13/1

21/1

123/2

156

22. डवाना

23.

13/1

2 8930

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART 11- SEC. 3 (ii) ) तहसीलः रेवाड़ी

जिलाःरेवाड़ी

राज्यः हरियाणा

गाँव का नाम

श्रेत्रफल

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा /किला संख्या

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्गमीटर 22. डवाना (जारी... )

156

[फा. सं. आर-31015/50/2004-ओ.आर-1 ]

हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 23rd November, 2004

S. O. 3040. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessaryto acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferredby sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Ram Karan Sharma , Competent Authority, Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, H. No. 1418, Sector - 6, Bahadurgarh -124507, District- Jhajjar (Haryana).

8931 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6; 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

IKAWAR Hanef

State : HARYANA

District: REWARI

Tehsil : REWARI

Are

Hectare

Square ZAWAMAKG

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Nameof Village

143

1. JAITRAWAS

1/2

00.

3/1

11/2

6/1

6/2

15/1

15/2

172

267

3422 GI/04-39 8932

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] Tehsil: REWARI

District: REWARI

State: HARYANA

Area Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No.

Hectare

Are 2. BHARAWAS

Square Metre

145

125

126

19/1

19/2

19/3

20/2

128

6/1

13/1

13/2

18/2

129

138

6/2

8/1

45 8933 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27. 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग 11-खण्ड 3( ii ) 」

State : HARYANA

District : REWARI

Tehsil : REWARI

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Square Metre

Mustil No.

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

14/1

138

145

2. BHARAWAS ( Contd... )

22/1

139

144

5/1

145

5/2

6/1

6/2

7/1

7/2

13/1

13/2

18/1

18/2

23/1

147

1/1

148

1/2 8934

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil :REWARI

District : REWARI

State: HARYANA

Area Nameof Village

Khasara / Killa

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre 2. BHARAWAS ( Contd... )

145

148 312

246

613

619

624

625

637

19 3.BHAWARI

150

21/2/1

17/1

18/1

18/2

24/3

25/1

25/2/1

2/1

3/1

6/1

7/1

8/2

9/1

12/1

13/1

13/2

14/1

10 8935 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

State: HARYANA

District: REWARI

Tehsil REWARI

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Square Metre Nameof Village

No. Mustil

Hadbast No.

000283

14/2

150

3. BHAWARI ( Contd ...)

16/2

16/3

17/1

25/1

21/1

21/2/1

1/1

77/1

77/2

152

4.KAMALPUR

21/1

21/2

108 42

16/1

16/2

22/3

23/1/2 8936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : REWARI

District: REWARI

State: HARYANA

Area Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre

152

4. KAMALPUR ( Contd ...)

23/2/1

12/1

12/2

19/1

19/2

21/1

3/1

3/2

155/1

15 5. CHHURIAWAS

157

1/2/2

3/1

10/1/1

73 8937 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6.1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District: REWARI

Tehsil : REWARI

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Nameof Village

Mustil No.

Square Metre

Hadbast No.

10/1/2

157

5. CHHURIAWAS (Contd... )

10/2/1

10/2/2

11/1/2

21/1

21/2

22/1

23/1

23/2

6/1

7/1

7/2

21/1

21/2

26 8938

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6. 1926

PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : REWARI

District : REWARI

State: HARYANA

Area

Khasara / Killa

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No

No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre

157

5. CHHURIAWAS ( Contd... )

0581

2/1

2/2

12/2

13-

18/2

25/1

25/2

150

159

160

50 6. DHAMLAKA

155

54 8939 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District: REWARI

Tehsil:REWARI

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Square Metre

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Nameof Village

23/2

155

95 6. DHAMLAKA ( Contd ...)

24/1

24/2

11/2

11/3

20/2

21/1

15/2

16/1

16/2

20/1

171

7. SHAHBAJPUR KHALSA

3422 GI/04 40 8940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] Tehsil : REWARI

District: REWARI

State: HARYANA

Area Name of Village

Hadbast No.

No. Mustil Khasara / Killa No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre 7. SHAHBAJPUR KHALSA

171

20/2

10 (Contd... )

21/1

21/2

12.

25/2

24/2

24/3

5/2/2

6/1

6/2

১

13/1

13/2

19/1

19/2

20/1

20/2

1/1

1/2

1/3

2/1

2/2

3/1

4/2

64 8941 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926-

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State: HARYANA

District: REWARI

Tehsil : REWARI

Area

Are

Hectare

Square Metre

Khasara / Killa NO

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Name of Village

171

7. SHAHBAJPUR KHALSA

7/1

(Contd...)

7/2

8/1

8/2

9/1

9/2

4/1

4/2

5/1

16/1

16/2

35/2

65 8942

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] Tehsil : REWARI

District: REWARI

State : HARYANA

Area Name of Village

Khasara / Killa

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

No.

Hectare

Are

Square Metre 7. SHAHBAJPUR KHALSA

171

42 (Contd...)

271

8. BHARIAWAS

170

3/1

3/2

8/1

8/2

10 8943 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: HARYANA

District: REWARI

Tehsil : REWARI

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Square Metre

Mustil No.

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

12/1/1

170

83 8. BHARIAWAS (Contd... )

12/1/2

12/2

12/3

13/1

13/2

22/1

21/1

188

9. MAJRA GURDASS

15/1

15/2

19/1

22/1

1/1

1/2

15 8944

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil :REWARI

District: REWARI

State: HARYANA

Area Name of Village

No. Hadbast

No. Mustil Khasara / Killa No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre

188

9. MAJRA GURDASS ( Contd... )

000090

80 10. KONSIWAS

174

17/1

17/2

001062

12/1

12/2

10 11. KALAKA

177

23/1

23/2

2/1

2/2

م 8945 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II-खंण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State: HARYANA

District: REWARI

Area

Tehsil : REWARI

Are

Hectare

Square Metre

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Name of Viliage....

3/2

177

11. KALAKA ( Contd ...)

11/2

12/1

12/2

20/2

20/1

21/1

21/2

61/1

178

12. MANDIA KALAN

11/2

12/1

12/2

6/1

^ 8946

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : REWARI

District: REWARI

State: HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

No. Mustil Khasara / Killa No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre

178

12. MANDIA KALAN ( Contd...)

6/2

24/1

24/2

-8

12/1

19/1

19/2

19/3

00 8947 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: HARYANA

District: REWARI

Tehsil : REWARI,

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Nameof Village

Mustil No.

Square Metre

Hadbast No.

178

12. MANDIA KALAN (Contd ... )

156

157

21/2

179

13. KHALILPURI

10/1

10/2

6/1

15/3

24/1

25/1

25/2

4/1

4/2

5/1

7/1/1

7/1/2

7/2/1

7/2/2

8/1/2

14/1

51/1

3422 GI/04-41 8948

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ) Tehsil : REWARI

District: REWARI

State : HARYANA

Area

Khasara / Killa

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

No. Mustil

No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre

179

13. KHALILPURI (Contd... )

65/1

24 14. MAJRA SHEORAJ

180

15/1

15/2

4/1

9/1

13/1

53 15. FHIDERI

204

1/2

10/1

16/1

16/2

62 8949 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6.1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: HARYANA

Tehsil : REWARI

District : REWARI

Area

Khasara / Killa

Nameof Viliage

Hadbast No.

No. Mustil

No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre

204

1/1

21 15. FHIDERI ( Contd ...)

1/2

16/1

16/2

7/1

7/2

8/1

14/1

19/1

22/1

22/3

23/1

1/1

2/1

03 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

PART II-SEC . 3( ii) | Tehsil : REWARI

District: REWARI

State : HARYANA

Area

Khasara / Killa

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

No.

Are

Hectare

Square Metre

204

15. FHIDERI ( Contd ... )

2/2

11/2

20/1

20/2

25/1

25/2

13/2

17/2

17/3

00.

7/1

7/2

22 8951

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: HARYANA

District : REWARI

Tehsil : REWARI

Area Nameof Village

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

204

15. FHIDERI ( Contd ...)

161

162

166

167

208

16. BUDHANI

23/1

23/2

3/1

3/2

3/3

3/4

9/2

12 8952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] Tehsil : REWARI

District: REWARI

State: HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre 16. BUDHANI ( Contd... )

208

86 17. RAMGARH

209

25/2

5/1

5/2

5/3

6/1

6/2

14/2

17/1

17/2

25/1

25/2

4/1

4/2

5/1

5/2

7/1

7/2

14/1

14/2

46 8953

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

State : HARYANA Tehsil : REWARI

District: REWARI

Area

Khasara / Killa

Nameof Village

No.

Hadbast No.

No. Mustil

Hectare Are

Square Metre

17/1

209

17. RAMGARH (Contd...)

7/1

186

192

5/1

18.DABRI

6/2

15/1

16/2

19/1/3

211

19. GOKALPUR

19/2

20/1/1

20/2/1

21/1/1

06.

21/1/2

21/2

22/1

6/2/1

15/2

16/1

16/2

25/1 8954

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Tehsil : REWARI

District : REWARI

State: HARYANA

Area

Khasara / Killa

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

No.

Are

Hectare

Square Metre

211

1/1

19. GOKALPUR ( Contd ...)

1/2/1

10/1/3

10/2

20/3

5/1

6/1

15/1

16/1/2

16/2/2

25/1

5/1

6/2

15/1

16/2

25/1

5/1

324

334

90 212

20. JANTI

7/1

18/2

23/1

3/1

55 8955 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6,1926

State : HARYANA

।भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Area

District: REWARI

Tehsil : REWARI

Are

Square Metre

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

30 Hadbast No.

Name of Village

9/2

212

12/1

20. JANTI (Contd...)

19/3

213

05 21. JANTSAIRWAS

2/2

3/1

3/2

12/1

12/2

19/1

19/2

15/3

16/1

25/3

1/3

3422 G1/04-42 8956

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

Tehsil : REWARI

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

District: REWARI

State: HARYANA Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Area

No. Mustil

Khasara / Killa No.

Hectare

Are 21. JANTSAIRWAS ( Contd... )

213

Square Metre

10/1

10/2

4/3

5/2

7/1

7/2

7/3

13/1

21/1

22.DAWANA

123/2

156

13/1

156

[No. R-31015/50/2004- O.R. -II ]

HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

8957 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर , 2004

Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofSub - section ( 1 ) and Sub - section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

का.आ. 3041 -औद्योगिक विषाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को. को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 104/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether there exists employer -employee relationship between the following 13 persons and the management of Salanpur Colliery in Area IV of M/ s. BCCL and whether the management isjustified in not taking them in regular employment with the appropriate wage rates as per NCWA - IV ? If not, to what relief are the workmen entitled to? " [सं. एल-20012/27/91- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi , the 27th October , 2004

(1) Md. Hussain Ansari , ( 2) Md. Shamin Akhtar Ansari , (3) Md. Naseem Akhtar Ansari, (4) Md. Farhat Hussain Ansari , (5) Rama Kant Yadav, (6) Ramesh Yadav, (7) Tej Bahadur Yadav, (8) Parsu Ram Pandey, (9) Raj Nath Tiwari , (10) Bhullu Yadav , ( 11 ) Ashok Kumar, ( 12) Kamla Prasad, ( 13) Dilip Kumar.

2. The case of the concerned workmen according to the written statement submitted by the sponsoring union on their behalf, in brief, is as follows :

S.O. 3041. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 104/91 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Dhanbad - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-04.

[No. L-20012/27/91 -IR(C-I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, DHANBAD ' In the matter of reference U/s . 10 (1) (d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947

Reference No. 104 of 1991

Employers in relation to the management of Salanpur Colliery, Katras Area ofM/s . B. C. C. Ltd.

AND

Their Workmen

PRESENT : Shri B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer

APPEARANCES On behalf of the Management : Shri D. K. Verma , Advocate .

Onbehalf of the None Workmen

Industry : Coal

State : Jharkhand.

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workmen were engaged by the management of Salanpur Colliery for performing duties of Auto Electricians which arepermanent and perennial nature ofjob since 1982. They submitted that against the work done by them the management used to pay remunerations simply on job rate basis . On 14-2-1990 the concerned workmen submitted a joint petition to the management with a prayer for regularising them in their respective job as per category rate of wages in time scale , but the management did not consider necessary to take any importance to the same . They submitted that the job which the concerned workmen used to perform were most essential for mechanised mining undertaking since all vehicles and machineries should remain in perfect working/running conditions for its development . As the management did not consider their prayer for regularisation in their services they sent another letter through sponsoring union on 16-3-1990 addressed to the General Manager, Katras Area No. IV again with a prayer for regularising them . They alleged that as the management did not consider their prayer they raised industrial dispute before the A.L.C. (C) , Dhanbad through the sponsoring union by letter dated 24-7-90 for conciliation which ultimately resulted to reference in this Tribunal for adjudication . The concerned workmen accordingly submitted prayer for passing award directing the management to regularise them as time- rated employee as perNCWA -IV w.e.f. 1-1-87 and other consequential relief.

Dated, the 7th October, 2004 .

AWARD

3. The management , on the contrary , after filing written statement- cum-rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the written statement submitted on behalf of the concerned By Order No. L-200 12/27 / 91 -I.R . (Coal - I ) dated the 25th July, 1991 the Central Government in the Ministry of 8958

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Tiwari, ( 10) Bhullu Yadav, ( 11 ) Ashok Kumar , ( 12) Kamla Prasad, (13 ) Dilip Kumar.

FINDING WITH REASONS

5. It transpires from the record that the management with a view to establish their claim examined one witness as MW- 1 . The concerned workmen also with a view to substantiate their claim examined two workmen, as WW- 1 and WW-2.

workmen. They submitted that no employer- employee relationship ever existed between the management and the concerned workınen . They categorically denied the fact that they were ever employed by the management. Accordingly the question of payment of wages to them never arose . They were neither controlled by the management nor they worked within the precinct and premises of the management. On the contrary , they submitted that the concerned persons claiming themselves to be employees of the management were actually the employees of road side private motor garage of Guhibandh Katrasgarh and they took up some repairing jobs to some vehicles of the management at the road side garage/ workshop whenever so required. Against such work bills used to be submitted by them and payment to them was also be made by the management accordingly . They considered that the concerned workmen claiming to be considered as employees at par with workmen of motor garage of the management situated at different areas where the vehicles are repaired at the workshop of the management is absolutely baseless . They submitted that the management have established auto -garages at different places for taking up repair and over -haul of its vehicles and for the said purpose they appointed workmen having experience on automobile works . Those persons who have been employed by the management are paid by them and they work under their direct control and supervision. The concerned persons cannot claim to be treated at par with employees of the auto workshop of the inanagement.

Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides and considering the evidence of MW - 1 and WW- 1 and WW -2 I find no dispute to hold that the managment used to repair their vehicles with a view to remove mechanical and electrical defects through road- side garage in case of exigencies. MW - 1 disclosed that they used to send their vehicles as well as dumper for repair to the road -side garages , namely, India Auto Electric and Diesel Automatic Service . Against performance ofthe work they used to submit bills showing cost of repair of vehicles and on verification the management used to pay thebills in support of its claim. MW - 1 submitted a bunch of bills and vouchers which during his evidence were marked as Ext . M - 1 series . This witness categorically denied that the concerned workmen ever were engaged by the management as their own employees. This witness categorically disclosed that road- side garage used to deploy theirworkmen for the purpose of repair their vehicles and accordingly they were employees of those road - side garages and not of the management.

They submitted that the management in case of need used to issue repairing order slips to the road side motor garage workshop for doing repairing jobs occasionally and in case ofurgency . Those workshop/ motor garage where repairing work is done belong to private owner motor garage. They only by virtue of repairing the vehicles of the management in case of exigencies cannot claim themselves to be the employees of the management . Accordingly, their claim is baseless and without any merit and for which they are not entitled to get any relief in view of their prayer. Management, accoridngly, submitted prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the concerned workmen.

POINTS TO BE DECIDED

4. Whether there exists employer-employee relationship between the following 13 persons and the management of Salanpur Colliery in Area IV of M/s . BCCL and whether the management is justified in not taking them in regular employment with the appropriate wage rates as per NCWA - IV? If not, to what relief are the workmen entitled to ?""

(1) Md. Hussain Ansari , (2 ) Md. Shamin Akhtar Ansari , (3 ) Md. Naseem Akhtar Ansari , (4) Md. Farhat Hussain Ansari , (5) Rama Kant Yadav, (6) Ramesh Yadav , (7) Tej Bahadur Yadav , (8) Parsu Ram Pandey, (9) Raj Nath

WW- 1 and WW - 2 during their evidence disclosed that they were the employees of Salanpur Colliery, Area No. IV of BCCL . They further submitted that they used to take up repair works of the vehicles of the management in discharging of their duties inside the colliery being their employees . WW -1 categorically denied during his evidence that against such work they used to subinit bills prepared by the contractor for payment. On the contrary, he disclosed that they used to take up work under the instruction and supervisionship of MW- 1 , R. K. Goel . These witnesses disclosed that as they continously worked under the management submitted joint representation for their regularisation but the management did not consider their prayer. WW- 1 further during his evidence disclosed that the management used to pay their wages after obtaining signature in the remuneration sheets. He alleged that as they were treated as piece- rated workers under the management taking opportunity of the same management used to pay less wages for the work done by them in comparison to the wages which they used to pay in case of permanent workers. Even the management denied to give any benefit like , LTC , LLTC . Medical leave, Provident facilities etc. In course ofhearing neither the sponsoring union nor the concerned workmen 8959 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रह्मयण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

calendar year. Considering the evidence of both sides and also considering the documents submitted by the management (Ext . M - 1 series ) it transpires clearly that the management used to get their vehicles repaired by private auto workshop in case of exigencies . For repairing motor vehicles the private garage owner used to deploy their own men and after completing the repair work they used to submit bills which were paid by the management. I have failed to find out an iota of evidence on the basis of which it can be said that the management engaged the concerned workmen as mechanics for repairing of their vehicles being piece-rated worker and they paid wages to them in that capacity . I , therefore , find no hesitation to say that inspite of getting ample opportunity the sponsoring union as well as the concerned workmen have failed to substantiate their claim with reasonable certainty . relief in view Accordingly, they are not entitled to get any oftheir prayer.

5..In the result, the following award is rendered--

In view of the discussions made above the management of Salanpur Colliery in Area No. IV ofM/ s . BCCL is justified in not taking the concerned workmen, mentioned in the order of reference , in regular employment with the appropriate wage rates as per NCWA- IV. Hence, the concerned workmen are not entitled to get any relief.

BIMLENDU BISWAS, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 3042.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/250/99- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th October , 2004

S.O. 3042. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court Dhanbad- II , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-04.

[No. L-20012/250/99 - IR(C- I ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

have been able to submit any letter of appointment issued by the management for their engagement as Motor Mechanic . These witnesses also have failed to produce any I. D. Card to show that they were employees of the management . Even they have failed to produce any wage- sheet to show that the management used to pay wages to them as piece- rated workers . There is no dispute to hold that the mangement used to arrange for repairing of their vehicles with a view to remove mechanical defects from outside in case of exigencies . It transpires that in course ofhearing the management produced a bunch of work- orders and bills (Ext. M- 1 series) to show the payment of bills to Diesel Auto Service and Indian Auto Electric, against the repair work of the vehicles of the management done by them. I have carefully considered these vouchers and bills and it exposed that for a considerable period they paid the bills to those garage owners for taking up repair workers of their vehicles. It is the claim of the concerned workmen that the management engaged them as motor mechanic in the year 1982 and since that year they are discharging their duties as motor mechanics for taking up repair works of the vehicles of the management . It is seen that the management have their own work - shop at Katras Area. MW - 1 during his evidence explained how in case of exigency they used to arrange for repair work of their vehicles through private automobile works. Considering the evidence of MW - 1 it transpires clearly that from two places i.e. their own Auto - workshop situated at Katras Area and through private garage owner they used to arrange for repair of their vehicles . Therefore, the question which has been cropped up automatically is that under which capacity the concerned workmen had been deployed for repairing of the vehicles of the management of Salanpur Colliery particularly when it transpires that at Salanpur Colliery there was no Auto Workshop for repairing the vehicles of the management . Excepting the claim placed by the concerned workmen, the concerned workmen failed to produce a single scrap of paper to show that they being piece-rated workers used to receive their wages from the management and were engaged by the management in 1982 being their employees . On the contrary, WW - 2 during his cross- examination admitted that the management usedto pay the charges of repair works of their vehicles through vouchers prepared on the basis of bills . He further disclosed that there was rate for each item of work and the management used to pay them wages according to rate. Accordingto the claim of the sponsoring union if it is considered that the concerned workmen were piece- rated workers the question of payment of bills against repairing works done by them and also the question of payment per item of work as per rate through voucher would not arise . The concerned workmen also in course of evidence have failed to establish that continuously since 1982 to 1990 they worked under the management and put their attendance for more than 240 days in each 8960

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii ) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2 DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

Inthematter of an Industrial Disputes under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE No. 3 OF 2000

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management ofPutki Balihari Colliery of M/s . BCCL and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman Mr. P.R. Shukla , Autho . Representative.

On behalf of the employers : Mr. S. M. Sinha, Advocate

State: Jharkhand.

Industry : Coal

of the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer he was dismissed from his service by the Disciplinary Authority videOrder No. PBP/PO/C/ 96/4562-20 dt . 3-12-96. They alleged that not only the management issued illegal chargesheet against the concerned workman but knowing fully well of the fact that the concerned workman was admitted at Lodna Hospital during the period in question for his treatment as he was suffering from Jaundice but also dismissed him illegally, arbitrarily and violating all principles of natural justice. Accordingly they submitted representation to the management for his reinstatement. But as the management did not consider the said prayer they raised an Industrial dispute before the ALC(C) , Dhanbad for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal by the Ministry for adjudication . Accordingly the sponsoring Union submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman in service from the date ofhis dismissal with full backwages and other consequential reliefs .

Dated, Dhanbad, the 5th October, 2004.

AWARD

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -20012/250/ 99 ( C- I), dated , the 20th January, 2000.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL , Pootki Balihari Project in dismissing Shri Ram Teras Ram, Timber Mazdoor from service w.e.f. 3-12-96 on the ground ofunauthorised absence is just, fair and legal? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2. The case of the concerned workman according to the Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring Union onhis behalf in brief is as follows:--

3. Management on the contrary after filing W.S.- cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegation which the sponsoring Union asserted in the W.S. submitted onbehalfof the concerned workman . They submitted that the concerned workman joined at Putki Balihari Projecton 21-6-96 on transfer as Timber Mazdoor and thereafter he started remaining absent from duty without giving any intimation or taking any prior permission from the management and in this way he remained himself absent from 24-6-96 to 21-9-96, and thereafter came to join to his dutywith medical certificate . Accordingly a chargesheet bearing No. PBP/EB/C/8 /96-3755-60dt . 23/ 24-10-96 was issued to the concerned workman for committing misconduct on the ground of unauthorised absence under clause26.1.1 ofthe Certified Standing Order. The concerned workman submitted his reply to the chargesheet but as the reply given by him was not satisfactory the Disciplinary authority decided to hold domestic enquiry against him. They submitted that the concerned workman fully participated in the hearing of the said domestic enquiry proceeding and they further submitted that full opportunity was given to the concerned workman to defend his case . After completion of the said enquiry Proceeding the EnquiryOfficer submitted his report holding the concemed workman guilty to the charges . The Disciplinary Authority thereafter considering the report of the Enquiry Officer and also considering all other aspects dismissed the concernedworkman from service vide letter No. PBP/PO/ C/96/4562-20 dt. 3-12-96. They submitted that they did not commit any illegality and took any arbitrary decision in dismissing the concerned workrnan from his service and forwhich the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief in view of his prayer.

4.. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

The concerned workman was a permanent employee ofPootki Colliery under Pootki Balihari Area of M/ s . BCCL as Timber Mazdoor. Subsequently he was transferredto Pootki Balihari Project. They submitted that the concerned workman was suffering from Jaundice with effect from 27-6-96 and he was shifted to Lodna Hospital under the management in precarious condition for his treatment. They. submitted that he was under prolonged treatment at Lodna Hospital from 28-6-96 to 20-9-96 and declared fit on 21-9- 96. On the strength of Medical certificate issued by the Medical Officer the concerned workman cameto his place of work for resuming his duties . But the Project Officer instead of allowing him to resume his duty kept silent till 23-10-96 and issued a chargesheet bearing No. PBP /PD/ CS/96-3755-60 dated 23-24-10-96 on the ground of committing misconduct for absentism as per clause 26.1.1 ofthe Certified Standing Order . Thereafter the management started departmental enquiry against him and on the basis

"Whether the action of the management of BCLL , Pootki Balihari Project in dismissing Shri Teras Ram , 8961 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रह्मयण 6 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Timber Mazdoor from service w.e.f. 3-12-96 on ground ofunauthorised absence is just , fair , and legal ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

5. FINDING WITH REASONS

consider necessary to examined the Medical Officer to establish the falsity of the Medical Certificate in question . The concerned workman specifically disclosed that as there wasno family member by his side he was admitted in the saidhospital and he did not find any scope to intimate the ground ofhis ailment to the management in due course of time. It is seen that the concerned workman for a considerable period remained in the hospital bed of the management for his treatment. It is not the case that the concernedworkman submitted Medical certificate showing hisreceiving treatment from out side doctor, He was actually treated by the Hospital of management . Therefore, the Hospital authority also could not avoid responsibility to intimate the management about the ailment of the concerned workman in due course of time but they also did not consider necessary to do so . There is also no evidence on the part of the management to the effect that the Medical Certificate which the concerned workman relied on is a manufactured one. I have failed to understand why the EnquiryOfficer did not have any importance to the medical certificate issued by the Medical Officer of the hospital run. by the management. There is no evidence to the effect on the part of management that the concerned workman wilfullyremained himself absent from duty. Therefore , ifall these aspects are taken into consideration I must say that theEnquiryOfficer was not fair in coming to the conclusion that the concemed workman actually committed misconduct under clause 26-1-1 ofthe Certificated Standing Order. A person when with all documents established the ground ofhis absence it was expected that due importance would begiven to the same. The Enquiry Officer neither gave any importance of the Medical certificate issued by theMedical Officer of Lodha Hospital under the management nor assigned any cogent reason why he disbelieved the medical certificate submitted by the concerned workman. It is clear that the concerned workman was not in a position to give any intimation to the management about his ailment as there was no family member by his side when he was admitted in the said hospital . The concemed workman was suffering from Jaundice , his condition was precarious and for which it was not possible on his part to give any intimation to the management about his ailment or ground ofhis absence. This aspect the Enquiry Officer did not consider . On the contrary the Enquiry Officer whimsically and arbitrarily submitted his report holding the concerned workman guilty to the charges .

It isfurther astonishing to note that the Disciplinary authoritywithout going merit of the case just relied on the report ofthe Enquiry Officer dismissed him from his service. I find no hetitation to say that the Disciplinary Authority did not apply mind before passing such drastic order. Management issued chargesheet to the concerned workman for his unauthorised absence from 24-9-96 to 21-9-96 when the concerned workman was lying in the bed ofthe hospital run by the management . He actually had no capacity to intimate the fact of his ailment to the It transpires from the record that before taking up hearing of the instant case on merit it was taken into consideration whether the domsetic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice . The said issue on preliminary point was disposed ofvide order No. 11 ( later) dt. 1-4-2004 in favour of the management . Now the point for consideration is whether the management have been able to etsablish the charge brought against the concerned workman if so whether the concerned workman is entitled to get any relief under Section 11A of the I.D. Act . The chargesheet during domestic enquiry proceeding was marked as Ext . M- 1 / 1 . From the chargesheet it transpires clearly that it was issued to the concerned workman under clause26-1-1 of the Certified Standing Order for committing misconduct on the ground of unauthorised absence of the concerned workman with effect from 24-6-96 to 21-9-96 . It is clear from the record that the concerned workman submitted his reply to the chargesheet disclosing the fact that suddenly he felt seriously ill and as there was no family member by his side he was admitted to Lodna Hospital under the management by his colleague for which he did not get scope to inform this fact to the management that he was lying ill in the hospital for his treatment with effect from the date in question. He also submitted medical certificate issued by the Medical Officer, Lodna Hospital . It is seen that inspite of considering the said medical certificate produced by the concerned workman the management did not consider necessary to accept the same taking the plea that the same was not sufficient and for whichthey decided to hold domestic enquiry against him. It is clear from the enquiry proceeding papers that the concerned workman not only appeared before the Enquiry Officer in the course of hearing of the domestic enquiry proceeding he also took the same plea of his ailment and relied on the Medical Certificate issued by the Medical Officer, LodnaHospital . After completing domestic enquiry the enquiry Officer submitted his report which was marked asExt .M- 1 / 11 . From the enquiry report it transpired clearly that the Enquiry Officer also did not consider the Medical Certificate issued by the Medical Officer , Lodna Hospital. Considering the medical certificate and also considering submission of the concerned workman it transpires clearly thatthe concerned workman was admitted at Lodna Hospital for his treatment and remained there as Lodna patient from 24-6-96 to 21-9-96 . I have carefully considered all the proceeding papers but I have failed to find out an iota of evidence relying on which there is scope to draw conclusionthat Medical Certificate issued by theMedical Officer,Lodna Hospital in favour of the concerned workman was false and manufactured . The Enquiry Officer did not 8962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

management on that ground. Therefore , such absencewhich was beyond his control cannot be said to be wilful absence and for which the charge which was framed against the concerned workman is not tenable in the eye of law . I, therefore, hold that the management have not been able to substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman with reasonable certainty. There is sufficient reason to hold that the inanagement not only ignored the reply given by the concerned workman and also the MedicalCertificate showing cogent reasons of his absence but also the Enquiry Officer followed the same path and without giving due importance to the Medical certificate issued by the Medical Officer of Lodna Hospital and found him guilty to the charges brought against him. Accordingly in view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I hold that the management illegally , arbitrarily and violating the principles of natural justice dismissed the concerned workman from his service . Accordingly the said order of dismissal is liable to be set aside and the concerned workman is to be reinstated in service from the date ofhis dismissal retaining his seniority.As the concemed workman was dismissed from his service violating the principle of natural justice inspite of existence of sufficient cause the management is liable to pay 40% back wages with consequential relief to him from the date of his order of dismissal . In the result, the following Award is rendered:-

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 27th October , 2004 S.O. 3043. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 118/98) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manageinent of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-04.

[No. L- 20012/225/97 - IR(C -I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy. ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2 DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE No.118 of 1998

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL's Ropeway and their workanan.

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalfofthe workman : Mr. K. Chakravorty , Advocate

Onbehalf ofthe employers : None

State: Jharkhand

"The action of the management of BCCL Pootki Balihari Project in dismissing Shri Ram Teras Ram , Timber Mazdoor from service w.e.f. 3-12-96 on the ground ofunauthorised absence is notjust , fair and legal . Consequently , the concerned workman is entitled to be reinstated in his original job from the date of his dismissal retaining his seniority with 40% back wages and other consequential reliefs from the date ofhis dismissal to the date of his reinstatement . " The management is directed to implement the Award without three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the observation made above.

B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 3043.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 118/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/225/97- आई.आर. ( सी- I ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

Industry : Coal

Dhanbad, the 4th October , 2004 AWARD

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 10 (d) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/225/ 97(C-I), dated , the 30th April, 1998 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management in denial to regularise Shri Kisto Mahato , Water Mazdoor as Cat. IMazdoor is justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? "

2. The course of hearing learned Advocate for the concerned workman submitted before this Tribunal that he has no instruction from the concerned workman to proceed with the hearing ofthis case. None also appeared on behalf of the management . It reveals from the record that the instant case is pending since 1998 for dismissal . Considering the age of case there is no reason to adjourn the same suo moto. Under such circumstances , a ' No dispute' Award is rendered and the instane reference is disposed ofon the basis of ' No dispute ' Award presuming non-existence of any industrial dispute between the parties.

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer 8963 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायणं 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2004

"Whether the claim of the Union that S/Shri Basudeo Saw and seven others (given below) were the employees ofthe management of M/s . BCCL in Putki Balihari Area and that their services were illegally terminated by the management is legal andjustified? Ifso, to what relief are these persons entitled ?"

1. Md . Gayasuddin Ansari , Asstt. Canteen Manager

का. आ. 3044.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा० को ० को० लि० के. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 141 / 96) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. Jagdeo Sao , Cook

[सं. एल. 20012/ 337/95- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

3. Shri Sahdeo Sao , Mazdoor

4. Shri Ganesh Singh, Mazdoor.

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th October, 2004

5. Shri Mathura Sao , Cook

6. Shri Ramjee Yadav, Canteen Boy

7. Shri Nand Lal, Canteen Boy.

2. The case of the concerned workmen according to the Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on their behalf is as follows :-

S.O. 3044. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 141/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-2004.

[No. L-20012/337/95 - IR (C- 1 ) ]

The sponsoring Union submitted that the concemed workmen started working in the Canteen of Pootki Balihari Project since 1983.

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri B. Biswas, Presiding Officer .

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 .

REFERENCE NO. 141 OF 1996

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management ofPutki Balihari Colliery of M/s . BCCL and their workmen.

APPEARANCES

Onbehalf of the workmen

Mr. Sekhar Sharma, Advocate.

They submitted that Dy. C.M.E. , Putki Balihari Project issued a letterdt . 5-7-83 asking one of the concerned workman Basudeo Sao to start a Canteen in the premises ofPutki Balihari Project as a Contractor but in law and fact saidworkman started working there actually as the workers of the management. They disclosed that to run the said Canteen management not only provided rooms but also supplied utensils , furnitures other articles and free coal, electricityetc. and also fixed the rate of different items to be prepared in the said Canteen. Licence to run the said canteen also was obtained in the name of Dy. C.M.Efrom JhariaMines Board ofHealth under the Food Adulteration Actand accordingly the management was the actual owner ofthe said Canteen. Inspite of all these facts management instead of recognising them as their employees , treated them as workers of the contractor with a view to avoid the relationship of employers and employees .

Onbehalf of the employers :

Mr. H. Nath, Advocate .

: Industry: Coal

State: Jharkhand

Dated, Dhanbad, the 5th October, 2004

AWARD

They alleged that the management without showing any reason and also without issuing any notice stopped function ofthe said Canteen w.e.f. November, 1987 illegally and arbitrarily. They submitted that under the Mines Rules Nos. 64, 66, 67, 69, 70 and 71 the management is required to maintain a Canteen for the workers of the Coal Mines . Since the maintenance of Canteen is a statutory requirement on the part of the management the workers engaged therein shall be deemed to be the workers of the management and for which the concerned workmen should be regularised as regular workers of the colliery and entitled to draw wages as per N.C.W.A. IV with all other The Govt. of India, Ministry ofLabour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/337/95 -IR( C-I) , dated, the 7th November, 1996.

3422 GI/04-43 8964

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

4. Points to be Decided

"Whether the claim of the Union that S/ Shri Basudeo Sao and seven others (given below ) were the employees of the management of M/ s . BCCL in Putki Balihari Area and that their services were illegally terminated by the management is legal andjustified? If so , to what relief are these persons entitled ? "

1. Md. Gayasuddin Ansari , Asstt . Canteen Manager

2. Jagdeo Sao , Cook

3. Sh Sahdeo Sao , Mazdoor

4. Sh. Ganesh Singh, Mazdoor.

5. Sh . Mathura Sao , Cook

consequential benefits . They disclosed that apart from CoalMines Rules the management is liable to maintain a Canteen under clause 8.9.1 of N.C.W.A. III , IV and V. Inspite of the existing Rules the management illegally and arbitrarily treated the concerned workmen as the men of the contractor not only but also stopped the Canteen in the month of November, 1987. After stopping the canteen representation was given to the management to open the Canteen and also to regularise the concerned workmen in the service of the Coal Mines but as their claim was not adhered to they raised an industrial dispute for conciliation before the ALC ( C) , Dhanbad which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication. The sponsoring Union accordingly submitted prayer to pass Award directing the management to reinstate the concerned. workmen in service along with other consequential benefits .

6. Sh . Ramjee Yadav , Canteen Boy.

7. Sh . Nand Lal , Canteen boy .

5. Finding with Reasons

It transpires from the record that sufficient opportunity was given to both sides but they failed to avail the same and for which they did not consider necessary to adduce evidence with a view to substantiate their claim and counter claim.

It is the specific contention of the sponsoring Union that Dy. C.M.E, Putki Balihari Project by letter dt . 5-7-83 though allowed Sri Basudeo Sao to start a canteen in the premises of P.B. Project as a contractor but in fact he was not the Contractor but an employee of the management along with other concerned workmen . In support oftheir claim they disclosed that management not only provided room for running the canteen but also supplied utensils , furnitures , other articles , free coal , electricity, etc. and also fixed rate of different food articles to be prepared in the said canteen . The letterdt . 5/8-7-83 which the sponsoring Union relied on shows that a contract for a period of one year was given to Basudeo Sao for operating a canteen in the premises of Putki Balihari project on the terms and conditions as follows:-

3. Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement- cum - rejoinder have denied all the claiıns and allegation which the sponsoring Union asserted in their Written Statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workmen . They submitted that Basudeo Sao one of the concerned workman who was a local resident , Vill : Aralgaria, P.S. Putki approached the local office allowing him to open a tea stall at the vicinity of the office so that he could earn his livlihood by supplying tea and snacks to staff and officers as per their requirement . The local office permitted him to open the tea stall at his own cost by investing his own capital and engaging his helper with a view to supply tea and snacks to the employees at reasonable price . They disclosed that the said arrangement was absolutely on temporary basis as there was no requirement for maintenance of a canteen as per the provision of Mines Rules , 1955. They disclosed that as per rule 64 ofMines Rules , 1955 , canteen is required to be maintained on tic surface of a mine where more than 250 persons are ordinarily employed . As there was no requirement of canteen as per Rules no question of opening a canteen in the building of the management specially carmarked for the same arose . In that situation there was no question of awarding any contract to Sri Basudeo Sao to run any canteen. He was mercly permitted to open a tea stall adjoining to the premises of the Project Area office and he was not at all a contractor of the company for running as Canteen .

" 1. This contract will be valid for one year from the date and it may be terminated within the year if your performation will not be found satisfactory. Youwill have to renew your contract on completion ofone year.

2. You will be provided accommodation of two rooms for operating canteen in Putki Balihari Project .

They alleged that the sponsoring Union with some ulterior motive attempted to make out a false and fabricated case that Sri Basudeo Sao was a Contractor and work order was issued in his favour for running a canteen. Accordingly question of their stopping from work in the canteen w.c.f. November , 1987 did not arise at all.

3. You willbe provided free coal , electricity , water, utensils , furnitures for which nominal rental of Rs . 25 p.m. will be charged.

Accordingly management submitted prayer to pass Award rejecting the claim of the concerned workmen.

4. You will have to operate the canteen inımediately .

8965 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

forthcoming there is no scope to arrive into any decision ifthat contractual period was extended or not.

5. The canteen shall have to be kept opened from 7 a.m. to 8p.m. every day .

6. Payment of wages to the persons engaged by you will be the liability of yours and management will not be responsible in any way.

7. Menu decided by the committee to be served by you shall be as follows :-

The claim of the sponsoring Union is that the said contract was a sham contract and the concerned workmen were actually the employees of the management and knowing fully well of this fact they stopped them from work illegally , arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice.

Rate

Item

Quantity

0.60

80ml

1. Tea

per cup

1.20

80ml

2. Coffee

-do-

2.00

Each

3. Fanta , Coca Cola.etc . Cold drinks each bottle

2.30

(Brand quality)

4. Modern Brand Bread

2.50

Each Pkt.

5. Biscuite Cream Britania

Itis seen that the contract was entered into between the management and Basudeo Saw and not with any other persons. The claim of the sponsoring union is that the rest six workmen also worked in the said canteen being employees of the management. When such claim has been made by the sponsoring Union they cannot avoid responsibility to show that excepting Basudeo Saw those sixworkmen actually worked in the said Canteen and they were employed by the management . They also cannot avoid their responsibility to establish that in disguise the management used to operate the said canteen through Basudeo Saw .

5.40

-do-

6. Biscuite (Britania Top)

Each of 50 gram 0.30

7. Singhara

Each of50 gram 0.50P.

8. Pakouri

0.30P.

-do-

9. Alu Chop

0.60P.

10. Mixture/Sheo

50gram

0.60P.

50gram

11. Laddu

0.60.P

50 gram

12. Jalebi

You shall have to deposit a sum of Rs . 500/- only towards security fee to our Finance Manager which shall be returned to you at the expiry of the validity of contract.

The sponsoring Union inspite of getting ample scope did not consider necessary to produce a single scrap ofpaper to show that other six concerned workmen worked in the said canteen and received wages from the management. It is fact that contract was given to Basudeo Saw for running the canteen subject to condition that he will supply tea and snacks at the rate fixed by the management . It is seen that excepting claiming nominal rental charges for the rooms to be used for canteen management as per contract agreed to provide free coal , electricity water , utensils and furnitures . Therefore , when management as per contract agreed to give subsidý I consider that by fixing the rate of tea and snacks they did not commit any illegality. What actually they did was for the interest of the workers so that they can purchase the same at fair price.

Please sign as a taken of acceptance.

Sd/-

Illegible (Dy. C.M.E. )

Pootki Balihari " Project"

The sponsoring Union inspite of getting ample scope neither considered necessary to examine Basudeo Saw nor produced any cogent paper to show that the concerned workmen were the employees of the management and the management used to operate the canteen entering into a camouflage contract .

Itis to be borne into mind that fact disclosed in the Written Statement cannot be considered as substantial piece of evidence until and unless the same is substantiated by cogent evidence . Considering all aspects carefully I find no hesitation to say that the sponsoring Union have failed to substantiate their claim lamentably . Just relying on the facts disclosed in the written statement there is no scope to arrive into any conclusion that the concerned workmen were actually the employees of the management and the management taking the pretext of contractusedto run the canteen with their own employees .

As per the said contract it was the liability of the contractor Sri Basudeo Saw to engage his workers and also to pay wages to them. As part of contract he was also directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 500/- towards security fee. The record shows that accepting the said contract " Basudeo Saw deposited the security money to the management . Accordingly , considering all these aspects there is no scope to deny that Basudeo Saw was not allowed to operate a canteen on contractual basis . It is also clear that he accepting the terms and conditions for running the canteen deposited security money to the management . There is also no dispute to hold that the said contract was valid for one year . As no letter of renewal of contract is 8966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman :

In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I hold that the concerned workmen are not entitled to get any relief.

Mr. R. R. Prasad, Advocate. In the result , the following award is rendered:-

On behalf of the employers : Mr. R. N. Ganguly, Advocate.

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal.

Dated, Dhanbad, the 6th October, 2004

AWARD

"The claim of the Union that S/ Shri Basudeo Saw and seven others (given below) were the employees of the management of M/ s . BCCL in Pootki Balihari Area and that their services were illegally terminated by the management is not legal and justified. Consequently , the concerned workmen are not entitled to get any relief. "

1. Md . Gayasuddin Ansari , Asstt . CanteenManager.

2. Jagdec Sao , Cook

3. Sh . Sahdeo Sao , Mazdoor .

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them urider Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/ 76/99 - IR( C - I) , dated the 4th June , 1999 .

4. Sh. Ganesh Singh , Mazdoor .

SCHEDULE

5. Sh . Mathura Sao , Cook

6. Sh. Ramjee Yadav Canteen Boy . "

7. Sh . Nand Lal , Canteen Boy .

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer

"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (N) U.G. Mines of M/s . BCCL in dismissing Shri Rajbali Bhuiya from the services of the company w.e.f. 9-3-94 is justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? "

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2004

2. The case of the concerned workman according to the Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on his behalf in brief is as follows :-

का.आ. 3045.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 250/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल.- 20012/76/99- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th October, 2004

S.O. 3045. ln pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 250/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to management ofBCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-2004.

[No. L -20012/76/99 -IR( C- 1) ]

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2)

AT DHANBAD

PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

The sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman was a permanent workman at Bhowra Colliery. They alleged that the management with the allegation of committing misconduct on the ground of absentism issued chargesheet to the concerned workman to which he submitted his reply denying the charges levelled against him. They submitted that the concerned workman duly intimated the reasons of his absence to the management but ignoring this fact they illegally issued the chargesheet not only but also conducted domestic enquiry without accepting reply submitted by him . They further alleged that in course of domestic enquiry the Enquiry Officer did notgive the concerned workman full opportunity to defend his case and closing the enquiry submitted a perverse report to the Disciplinary Authority and the Disciplinary Authority relying the said report dismissed him from service . They submitted that the management dismissed the concerned workman illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice . Accordingly , the concerned workman raised an industrial dispute for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . The sponsoring Union on behalf of the concerned workman accordingly submitted prayer to pass award directingthe management to reinstate him in service from the date of dismissal with full back wages and other consequential relief.

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 .

REFERENCE NO . 250 OF 1999

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management ofM/ s . BCCL and their workman.

3. Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement-cum-rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegation which the sponsoring union asserted in the written statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workman.

8967 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

During hearing the chargesheet was marked as Ext . M- 1 . The chargesheet issued to the concerned workman speaks as follows :

"Bharat Cooking Coal Limited

(A Subsidiary of Coal India Ltd.)

P.O. Bhowra, Dhanbad, Bhowra (N) Colliery.

Ref. No. PS/96/ ( N ) U/G Mines/CS/10 Dt. 31-1-96

Sri Rajbali Bhuiya, Designation DCL 16A BHOWRA ( N) U/G. Mines

Home address :

Vill .

P.S.

PO Dist.

Sub.: Chargesheet .

It appears from our records that you were absenting from duty with effect from 15-11-95 without any information/permission of the appropriate authority.

Admitting the fact that the concerned workman was a permanent workman at Bhowra (N) U.G. Mines submitted that he was in the habit of remaining himself absent from dutywithoutgiving any information or taking any permission ofthe management . They disclosed that during 1993, 1994 and 1995 the concerned workman put his attendance for 82 days, 109 days and 79 days respectively. They submitted that the concerned workman again started himselfabsenting from duty without giving information or taking permission from the management w.e.f. 15-11-95 and continuedto remain absent . As the said unauthorised absence amounted to misconduct a chargesheetdt. 31-1-96 was issued to him to which he submitted his reply. As the reply given by him was not satisfactory a domestic enquiry was started against him through Enquiry Officer duly appointed by the Disciplinary Authority. During hearing the concerned workman participatedand full opportunity was given to him to defend his case . They further submitted that not only in course of hearing but also in his reply to the chargesheet he admitted his guilt. As there was sufficient material against the concerned workman the Enquiry Officer after completing the said enquiry submitted his report holding him guilty to the charge brought against him. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority considering the report and also considering all othermaterial facts dismissed the concerned workman from his service . They submitted that in dismissing the concerned workman from service the management neither committed any illegality nor took any arbitrary decision violating the principle ofnatural justice. Accordingly, they submitted that the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief in view of his prayer and for which his claim is liable to be rejected.

4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

Under the circumstances , you are hereby charged formisconduct in terms of the following paras of Certified Standing Order for wokmen of Establishment under BCCL in which Bhowra (N) U./G . Mines falls .

26: 1: 1 Habitual late attendance or wilful or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause .

"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (N) U.G. Mines ofM/ s . BCCL in dismissing Shri Rajbali Bhuiya from the services ofthe company w.e.f. 9-3-96 is justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"

5. FINDING WITH REASONS

26: 1: 10 Habitual indiscipline or wilful in subordination of disobedience of any lawful or reasonable order of higher authority.

You are hereby called upon to explain in writing within 48 hours of the receipt of the chargesheet as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against you for your unauthorised absence from duty.

It transpires from the record that before taking up hearing ofthis case on merit it was taken into consideration ifdomestic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice. The said issue on preliminary point was disposed of vide order No. 17 dated 10-3-04 and it was observed that domestic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair , proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice .

Sd/- Illegible

Project Officer/Manager Bhowra (N) UG. Mines . " Accordingly, here the point for consideration is whether the management have been able to substantiate the charge brought against concerned workman and if so whether he is entitled to get any relief as per provision laid down U/ S . 11A ofthe I.D. Act .

8968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

the ground of Charge No. II appears to be unjustified. However , as management have been able to establish charge No. 1 I find no scope to say that the management, illegally dismissed the concerned workman from his service..

Now the point for consideration is whether the concerned workman is entitled to get any relief u/s. IIA of the I.D. Act, 1947. Section 11A speaks as follows :-

It is seen that chargesheet was issued to the concerned workman on 31-1-96 . It is the allegation of the management that the concerned workman started remaining himself absent from duty without giving any information or taking any permission w.e.f. 15-11-95 i.e. the concerned workman remained himself absent unauthorisedly for a period of 2½ months continuously . It is admitted fact that the concerned workman after receipt of the chargesheet submitted his reply which during hearing was marked as Ext . M- 1 / 1 . From the reply given by the concerned workman it transpires that he could not attend to his duty owing to illness of his wife buthas failed to assign any reason what cause prevented him to intimate this fact to the management . The sponsoring Union in the Written Statement disclosed that reasons of the absence of the concerned workman was duly intimated to the management but in course of hearing they have failed to produce a single scrap of paper . As such I hold that the plea taken by the sponsoring Union in the Written Statement appears to be baseless .

"Where an industrial dispute relating to the discharge or dismissal of a wrokman has been referred to a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal for adjudication and in the course of the adjudication proceedings , the Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal , as the case may be, is satisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal was notjustified, it may, be its award set aside the order of discharge or dismissal was not justified, it may, by its award , set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of the work man on such terms and conditions , if any, as it thinks fit, orgive such other relief to the workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstances of the casemay require."

It is the specific claim of the concerned workman thatowing to illness of his wife he could not attend to his duty but inspite of claiming so in course of hearing he has failed to produce a single scrap of authentic medical paper . No reason also was assigned by him which prevented him to submit medical papers relating to treatment of his wife. Accordingly, there is sufficient reason to believe that the plea taken by the concerned workman for his absence appears to be baseless and cannot be accepted . I have considered the report of the Enquiry Officer (Ext . M- 1/5) wherein it has also been exposed clearly that the concerned workman in support of the claim that his wife was lying ill has failed to adduce any cogent evidence. On the contrary accepting his guilt he requested the management to allow him to resume his duty . Considering all material aspects 1 therefore hold that management have been able to substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman under clause 26 : 1 : 1 of the Certified Standing Orders.

As regardsto Charge No. 2 I have carefully considered the enquiry report as well materials on record including evidence of MW - 1 . The enquiry officer in his report neither made any whisper nor MW- 1 during his evidence disclosed anything in that regard . The order of dismissal during evidence was marked as Ext . M- 1 /8 . It is scen from this order that the Disciplinary Authority dismissed the concerned workman from his services relying on the charges for committing misconduct. After careful consideration of all the material on record I have failed to find out an iota of evidence relying on which there is scope to say that management have been able to substantiate charge No. 2 brought against the concerned workman. Accordingly, I hold that order of dismissal on

Therefore, it is to be taken into consideration if the order of dismissal passed by the management was justified or not . Simultaneously it also should be taken into consideration if the said order of dismissal was proportionate in relation to the misconduct committed by the concerned workman. It is seen that in the Written Statement the management disclosed to the effect that the concerned workman was in the habit of remaining himself absent from duty and in support of that claim they submitted that during the years 1993 , 1994 and 1995 the concerned workman put his attendance for 82 days , 109 days and 79 days respectively. This fact however , has not been reflected in the chargesheet and for which there is no scope to take cognisance of the same in support of the claim of the management . It is seen that in the instant case for absence of 2½ months the concerned workman was dismissed from his service . It is fact that the concerned workman in course of his evidence has failed to justify the reason of his such unauthorised absence by adducing cogent evidence though he took the plea that his wife was lying ill. It is seen that in course ofhearing the concerned workman pleaded his guilty. It shows that the concerned workman realised the fault committed by him. When the concerned workman has exposed such mentality I consider that an opportunity is required to be given to him for his rectification in future so that he can shape himself to be a sincere workman. Moreover, the chargesheet shows that the concerned workman was given 48 hours time to submit his reply . As 8969 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Court, Dhanbad - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-2004.

per clause 48 hours time is given in case of minor offence. Therefore , the very intention of the management was not to award serious nature ofpunishment though it was so inflicted.

[No. L-20012/532/2001 - IR(C- 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD.

PRESENT:

ShriB. Biswas , Presiding Officer .

In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I hold that order of dismissal from service for absence of 2½ months appears to be unjustified not only but also it is to be considered disproportionate . I, therefore, hold that an opportunity is required to be given to the concerned workman so that he can get the scope of his ntending . In the result , I set aside the order of dismissal passed against the concerned workman by the management and instead his two increments should be stopped permanently. He also will not be entitled to get any back wages without affecting the continuity of his service.

In the result, the following Award is rendered :-

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947. REFERENCE NO . 19 OF 2002

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management ofC. V. Area of M/ s . BCCL and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

None

Onbehalf of the workman :

On behalf of the employers

"The action of the management of Bhowra (N) U.G. Mines of M/s . BCCL in dismissing Shri Rajbali Bhuiya from the services of the company w.e.f. 9-3-96 is not justified. Consequently, the concerned workman is entitled to be reinstated in his service from the date of his dismissal without any back wages. However, he will get the continuity of his service and his two increments will be stopped by the management permanently.

A. K. Sinha , Advocate.

Industry: Coal .

State : Jharkhand

Dated, Dhanbad, the 4th October, 2004 :

The management is directed to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the observation made above.

AWARD

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर , 2004

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1) ( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 532/2001 dated, the 28th February , 2002 .

SCHEDULE

का. आ. 3046.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा० को० को० लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 19/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . BCCL in refusing to regularise Sri Ramdayal Mishra as pay loader Operator is fair and justified ? If not, to what relief is the concemed workman entitled and from what date ?"

[सं. एल -20012/532/2001- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th October , 2004

S.O. 3046. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 19/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

2. In this reference neither the concerned workınan nor his representative appeared . Management , however , have made appearance through their authorised representative . Record shows. that inspite of issuance of consecutive notices neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union considered necessary to submit Written Statement in the instant case . The attitude of the concerned workman/ sponsoring union if is taken into consideration will 8970

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

expose that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to proceed with the hearing of the case . Accordingly, this Tribunal finds no ground to keep pending this case for days together only for appearance of the concerned workman/union . Hence, the case is closed . Under the circumstances , a 'No dispute ' Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of ' No dispute ' Award presuming non - existence of any industrial dispute between the parties.

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 3047.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी०सी ० एल ० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 38/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/70/2001- आईआर ( सी -1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th October, 2004

S.O. 3047. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 38/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Dhanbad - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-2004.

[No. L-20012/70/2001 - IR(C-1 ) ]

S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD.

PRESENT :

Shri B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer.

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947 .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Reference No. 38 of 2003

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management ofSwang Colliery of M/ s . CCL and their workmen.

APPEARANCES M :

Onbehalf of the workmen : None

On behalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate. State : Jharkhand

Industry:Coal.

Dated , Dhanbad, the 4th October, 2004.

AWARD

TheGovt. of India , Ministry ofLabour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 70/ 2001 - IR( C- I) , dated the 2nd May, 2003 .

SCHEDULE

"KYA RASHTRIYA COLLIERY MAZDOOR SANGH KI C.C.L. SWANG COLLIERY KEY PRABANDH- TANTRA SEY MANG KI KARMKAR SHRI SULTAN AHMAD , DRIVER KI JANM TARIKH 5-6-1941 KEY STHAN PAR 15-8-1945 ΚΟ SAHI MANA JAYAE TATHA USI KEY ANURUP SEVA NIVRITTI KI TARIKH TAY KI JAYE , UCHIT EVAM NAYA SANG HAI ? YADI HAI TO KARMKAR KIS RAHAT KAY PATRA HAI ? " 2. In this case neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. Management , however, have made appearance through their learned Advocate. Record shows that inspite of issuance of consecutive notices neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union considered necessary to submit Written Statement in the instant case . The attitude of the concerned workman/ sponsoring union if is taken into consideration will expose that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to proceed with the hearing of the case. Accordingly, this Tribunal finds no ground to keep pending this case four days together only for appearance of the concerned workman/ sponsoring union . Hence , the case is closed . Under the circumstances , a ' No dispute ' Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of' No dispute ' Award presuming non - existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer 8971 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2004

dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/436/94 - IR- (C- I ) dated, the 18th October , 2004.

SCHEDULE

का.आ. 3048.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 151/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the demand of the union for employment of Bimli Mahatain as Casual Wagon Loader at Kooridih Colliery at Govindpur Area No. III ofM/s . BCCL , is justified ? If so, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"

[सं. एल.- 20012/436/94- आई.आर. ( सी-1) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th October, 2004

S.O. 3048.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 151/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workmen , which was receivedby the Central Government on 27-10-2004.

[No. L -20012/436/94 - IR(C -I ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. Management , however , made appearance through their authorised representative. Record shows that in spite of issuance of consecutive notices neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union considered necessary to submit Written Statement inthe instant case . The attitude of the concerned workman/ sponsoring union if is taken into consideration will expose that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to proceed with the hearing of the case. Accordingly, this Tribunal finds no ground to keep pending this case for days together only for appearance of the concerned workman/union . Hence , the case is closed. Under the circumstances , a ' No Dispute ' Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of ' No Dispute' Award presuming non -existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

ANNEXURE

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2004

PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 151 of 2000

का.आ. 3049.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. केप्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 287/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । PARTIES:

[सं. एल.- 20012/185/99-आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव Employers in relation to the management of M/ s. BCCL and their workmen.

New Delhi , the 27th October , 2004 APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman : None

On behalf of the employers : Mr. D.K. Verma , Advocate .

Industry: Coal

State: Jharkhand

Dhanbad , the 4th October , 2004

AWARD

S.O. 3049. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 287/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-2004.

[No. L- 20012/ 185/ 99 - IR(C- I)] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1)(d) of the 1. D. Act , 1947 has referred the following

3422 G1/04-44 8972

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer .

in the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 REFERENCE NO . 287 OF 1999 PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL and their workmen .

APPEARANCES :

On behalf of the workman : None

Onbehalf of the employers Mr. R.N. Ganguly, Advocate.

State : Jharkhand

: Industry: Coal

Dhanbad, the 4th October . 2004

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1) ( d) of the 1. D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -20012/ 185 /99 - IRC ( C - I ) dated, the 3rd August, 1999 .

SCHEDULE

" KYA B.C.C.L. SUDAMDIH COLLIERY KEY PRAVANDTANTRA DWARA KARMAKAR SHRI JAGAT NARAYAN PASWAN KO TB CHIKISTSA KEY DOURAN MEDICAL BOARD NA VEJ KAR ANUPASTITHI KEY AROP MEY ANUSHASANIK KARYABAHI DWARA SEVA SEY BARKHAST KIYA JANA UNCHIT HAI ? YADI NAHI TO KYA UNKI MRITYUPARANT UNKEY ASHRIT KO NIYUKTI DIA JANEY KI UNION KI MANGUCHIT EVAM NAYASANGATHAI ? YADI HA TO KARMKAR KEY UKT ASHRIT KIS RAHATKEY PATRA HAI ? "

2. In this case neither the concerned workman nor his Union appeared before this Tribunal . Managentent, however , inade appearance through their learned Advocate . It transpires from the record that in spite of issuance of repeated notices the concerned workman or

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

7 his representative did not consider necessary to appear with a view to take steps in connection with this case . This is a case of 1999. Considering the conduct of the sponsoring union/ workman it shows clearly that they are not interested to proceed with the hearing of this case . In the circumstances , there is no justification to adjourn the case for days together suo motu by this Tribunal. Hence , the case is closed and a ' No Dispute' Award is passed in this reference presuming non - existence of any industrial dispute between the parties . The reference in question is disposed of accordingly.

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer..

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 3050.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को . को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 191/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं . एल.- 20012/140/2001 - आई.आर. ( सी- I ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th October , 2004

S.O. 3050.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 191/ 2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Dhanbad - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-2004 .

[No. L- 20012/ 140/2001 - IR(C - I) ]

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO.2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act , 1947

REFERENCE NO . 191 OF 2001

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Govindpur Area No. III of M/ s . BCCL and their workmen..

8973 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

APPEARANCES :

को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Onbehalfof the workman : Mr. B. N. Singh,

[सं. एल-12012/333/97- आई.आर. ( बी. II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव General Secretary . National Coal Workers Congress.

New Delhi , the 28th October , 2004 Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. B.M. Prasad, Advocate.

: Industry: Coal

State : Jharkhand

Dhanbad, the 4th October , 2004

AWARD

S.O. 3051. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 214/98) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum-Labour Court , No. 2, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of UCO Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-10-2004.

[No. L- 12012/333 /97- IR (B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 140/2001 - IRC ( C-I) dated, the 10th July, 2001.

ANNEXURE

SCHEDULE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAI

"Whether the demand of the NCWS from the management of BCCL , Govindpur Area to regularise Shri Mukhlal Gope as Underground Munshi is proper and justified ? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ? "

ID No. 214/98

Ms. Radha Rani Gupta daughter of Late Mr. M.R. Gupta , R/ o House No. 10335 , Street No. 1 , West Gorakh Park , Shahdara , Delhi-110 032.

VERSUS

U.C.O. BANK

ZONAL OFFICE, 5, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI - 110001 .

AWARD

2. In this reference both the parties appeared through their respective authorised representative .. Subsequently , at the stage of filing rejoinder and document the representative of the workman submitted hat the concerned workman is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case and accordingly prayed to pass necessary order . In view of the submission made by the representative of the workman , the representative of the management submitted that when the concerned workman is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case it is redundant to proceed with the case further. Heard both sides . In view of the prayer of both sides a 'No dispute' Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of ' No dispute ' Award presuming non-existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

The Ministry of Labour by its Letter No. L - 12012/ 333/97 - IR(B - II) CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DT. 20-10-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication:

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer

The point runs as hereunder :-

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2004

"Whether the action of the management of the UCO Bank in imposing the punishment of stoppage of five increments on Ms. Radha Rani Gupta and for treating the suspension period as without duty isjustified ? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled and what directions are necessary in this case.

का. आ. 3051.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं ० 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 214/98 ) 8974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

her proper opportunity . She has participated in the enquiry fully and principles of natural justice have been followed. The statements of her claim are misconceived and wrong.

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In her statement of claim , she has stated that she was appointed as an accounts clerk in B /o Parliament Street , New Delhi in the month of October , 1977. The bank officers , some workmen, union Icaders and high officials of the respondent bank started to torture the workman after finding out that the workman is unmarried , independent and lone/helpless lady for their dirty advances .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder and in her rejoinder , she has reiterated the averments of her statement of claim and denied most of the paragraphs of the written statement. After filing rejoinder, she absented from 5-8-2003 in the Court of CGIT - I . She was not present from 9-12-2002 . As such , she has been absenting for almost two years in the previous court despite her knowledge.

The management has filed written arguments . The workman applicant was deliberately avoiding the proceedings of this court as she has filed writ perition No. 1318/2000 against the management bank . The Hon'ble High Coutr of Delhi dismissed her writ petition . She has challenged the orders of Disciplinary Authority dt . 22-7-1999 and 19-8-1999 and that of Appellate Authority dated 25-3-2000 arising out of charge sheets dt. 18-12-1997 and 3-4-1998 respectively in Civil Writ Petition No. 1318 of 2000 before the Hon'ble High Court ofDelhi .

That she was transferred to Branch Office , Chandni Chowk . Delhi - 110006 of the respondent UCO Bank in July . 1989 where she was extremely harassed by some high officials and union leaders and employees of the aforesaid branch. She complained about it to the higher authoritics but they took no action, rather encouraged the said certain erring officials/ union leaders . She complained to the police and the police investigated but thereafter the officials of the bank in order to fulfil their ulterior motives suspended her illegally on 6-8-1991 and they tried to outrage her modesty . Her suspension was illegal in view of the first Bipartite settlement as amended upto date and they set up an enquiry. The allegations weré levelled against her that she abused Mr. D.K. Rastogi and hurled chappal on Mr. Sumer Chand . They wanted to establish the charges by hook or by crook . The Enquiry Officer held her guilty and thedisciplinary authority awarded punishment dt. 21-02-1994 treating the whole suspension period of 3 to 4 years without duty with stoppage of five increments with cumulative effect .

That the order and the finding of the enquiry officer were illegal . She appealedto the Appellate Authority but the order was confirmed and again charges were framed against her and she has been dismissed illegally.

The Hon'ble High Court has given detailed judgement dealing with all the charge sheets and her complaints of sexual harassment and has ultimately concluded that she was given full and complete opportunity to defend herself. She rejected a very fair offer given to her on 16-8-2002 . After dealing with the matter which is a subject matter of this case , the High Court rejected her writ petition . As the Hon'ble High Court has dealt with all the allegations and the statement of facts stated in the statentent of claim and after full hearing, her writ petition was rejected and the Hon'ble High Court found none of her statement to be true . That is why , she is deliberately absenting . She could get no relief on the same inatter from the Hon'ble High Court . As such, her matter cannot be discussed again in view of the findings on the same of the Hon'ble High Court . The order of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in writ petition No. 1318/2000 is final and it has not been shown that she has gone against the judgement to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. No paper has been annexed with the record , as such, there is no merit in the case of the workman applicant .

The reference is replied thus : -

The management has 11ted written statement. In the written statement , it has been submitted that she acted in a violent and disorderly manner . She used abusive language against her colleagues of the branch office at Chandni Chowk. She was placed under suspension on 7-8-1991 and during enquiry , she was found guilty of the charges levelled against her and she was punished with stoppage of one increment and suspension was subsequently lifted on 26-2-1994. Her appeal was also rejected . She was paid subsistence allowance during her period of suspension . She was served a charge sheet on 18-12-1997 for gross misconduct and enquiry was conducted against her for her disorderly behaviour on the premiscs of the bank. After detailed enquiry , she was found guilty and she was dismissed from the bank's service . The order of dismissal was conveyed to her. The relief prayed for her cannot be granted to her . The rest of the statements of claint are denied. Enquiry has been held after giving

The action of the management of the UCO Bank in imposing the punishment of stoppage of five increments onMs. Radha Rani Gupta and for treating the suspension period as without duty is justified. The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief and any direction as prayed for.

8975 भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

AWARD

The award is given accordingly.

Dt. 15-10-2004

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L. - 12011 / 114/2000- IR(B -II) Central Governmentdt. 31-08-2000 has referred the following point for adjudication.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

The point runs as hereunder :-

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2004

"Whether the action of the Deputy General Manager, Canara Bank, Circle Office, Marshall House, Nehru Place, New Delhi , in dismissing from services w.e.f. 13-06-1998 Shri Naresh Kumar Gupta (31732), New Delhi is justified, proper and valid? If not, what relief and benefits he is entitled to . " का. आ. 3052.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं . 2, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 100/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011/114/2000- आई.आर. (बी. II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th October , 2004

The Union has filed statement of claim on behalf of the workman. In the statement of claim, it has been stated that the workman Naresh Kumar Gupta was employed with the management of Canara Bank as Clerk with effect from 06-09-1980 . He was drawing salary last around Rs . 9,000/- per month . He was last posted at South Extension II Branch, New Delhi . That the subject matter of the reference pertains to the charge sheet dated 28-01-1997 . Therefore , he is restricting his ground of challenge pertaining to that charge sheet and the proceedings of enquiry and findings illegally recorded in that although the other proceedings initiated against the workman were also not valid, proper and bonafide .

The allegations in the charge sheet dated 28-01-1997 read as under :--

"CHARGE"

S.O. 3052.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 100/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. 2, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government ơn 28-10-2004.

[No. L. - 12011 /114/2000 -IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAI ,

ID No. 100/2000

In the matter of :-

Shri Naresh Kumar Gupta, S/o . Shri R.C. Gupta , G-79 , Lajpat Nagar- I , New Delhi .

VERSUS

"You are presently working as Clerk in our South Extension Branch, New Delhi since 27-7-1991 and are presently under suspension w.e.f. 13-8-1996 . It is reported that on 18-7-1996, Ms. Om Shree Sharma A/ c . holder of SB A/ c . No. 19923 remitted a sum of Rs . 10,000/- in cash to be credited to her SB A/ c. on 19-07-1996. Shri Abdul Alim, A/c . holder of SB A/ c . No. 18384 remitted a sum of Rs . 30,000/-in cash to be credited to his SB A/ c . On both these days . you were working as Receipt- Cashier and on receipt of the cash from the account holders , you have issued counterfoils duly signed . However, you have failed to credit the above amounts on the same day of receipt of the amounts in their respective accounts . Both the counterfoils are initialled by you, as Casluer . The said amounts have been credited in their accounts on 19-07-1996 and 20-07-1996 respectively with delay. Further, the Shroff Book has many cuttings /over writings without due authentication. Ms. Om Shree Sharma and Shri Abdul Alim, the account holders, have informed the Branch of delay in crediting the remittances made by them.

It isevident from the above that while working as Receipt Cashier , you have misused your official position and not credited the amounts deposited by the customers The General Manager, Canara Bank, Circle Office , 9thFloor, Ansal Tower , Nehru Place, NewDelhi - 110019.

8976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II--SEC. 3 (ii)]

}

which the amount was taken from the account holder by a peon of the Bank although that peon had received the amount from the customer , put his initials on the counterfoils given to the party but did not deposit the money in the Bank. The aforesaid Senior Manager , the Enquiry Officer and other officials deliberately suppressed all these facts and did not allow the same to be brought on the surface and the workman was insisted upon to make deposit from his own pocket under coercion, threat and employing deceptive tactics.

on the same day in their respective accounts and misappropriated the said amounts temporarily. It is also reported that on 20-07-1996, Shri Surinder Kumar , A/c, holder of SB A/c . No. 5511 remitted a sum of Rs . 6,600/ - in cash to be credited to his SB A/c . The A/c . holder has lodged a complaint with the branch for non credit of Rs. 6,600/-, credited/remitted on 20-07-1996 along with the copy of the counterfoil with the stamp on it. You were working as Receipt Cashier on 20-07-1996 and you failed to credit the amount deposited by the customer on the same day and misappropriated the above amount temporarily with malafide intentions . You have also confirmed that the cash received stamp was in your custody on 20-07-1996 . Subsequently, you have remitted the amount of Rs . 6,600/ - by cash on 13-08-1996 . The Shroff Book shows over writings/ alterations which shows that you have tampered the records of the Branch by misusing your official position .

That one Shri S. Raj Shekharan was appointed as the Enquiry Officer and one Shri S. Nanda Kumar was appointed as the Presenting Officer. The workman denied the allegations before the Enquiry Officer . The management gave a list of six witnesses which included the names of ( i) . Miss Om Shree Sharma , A/c . holder (ii). Sh . Abdul Alim, A/c. holder, ( iii) , Sh. Surinder Kumar , A/c . holder. None of these witnesses were examined by the Enquiry Officer as management witnesses..

Your above acts of temporarily misappropriating the funds of the Bank/ Customers and making cuttings/ over writings in the Shroff Book etc. are prejudicial to the interests of the Bank which touches upon your integrity and honesty is also a gross mis- conduct under the meaning of Chapter XI Regulation 3 (m) of Canara Bank Service Code ."

This was deliberately avoided to be done, However , Miss . Om Shree Sharma was later on produced as defence witness much against the desire of the Enquiry Officer as well as the management because they were bent upon. holding the workman guilty of the charges even in absence of legal evidence .

That the other three witnesses included the aforesaid Senior Manager, one Shri R.P. Shah , Investigating Officer and Shri Vinod Kumar, Cashier. The enquiry is bad for several reasons which are enumerated in the succeeding paragraphs and under the grounds , the findings are perverse, the enquiry officer acted with extreme bias and prejudice and conducted the enquiry under the dictates of the Senior Officers and without applying his mind. The Enquiry Officer observed in his findings that the workman could not be found guilty in connection with the charge relating to the charge of Miss Om Shree Sharma, but illegally held the workman guilty of the other two charges .

That the Senior Manager was also instrumental in getting other charges issued. On 13-08-1996 , the workman was summoned by ltim in his cabin suddenly and he was told that a serious report has been received against the workman that he received a sum of Rs . 6,600/- for deposit from a party but did not allegedly enter it in cash book and that the Circle Office wanted that the workman should immediately deposit the amount in order to save himself from serious consequences . He was told to deposit the amount in the name/account of one Surinder Kumar operating SB A/ c . No. 6611. On the asking of the Senior Manager , Shri K.L. Mallya , the amount was deposited. He had asked the workman to sign the pay - in-slip in token of having received the cash and deposited the same on the date when the pay - in- slip was filled up . This was refused to be done by the workınan because the Senior Manager refused to show the pay- in - slip bearing the signatures of the workman to the effect that he had received the amount and allegedly failed to enter the same in the cash book or show the deposit in the Bank . However , the amount was deposited by the workman from his pocket and without knowing the details.

That it was a false , fabricated and concocted allegation at the instance of MW - 1 Shri K.L. Mallya that the account holder Ms. Om Shree Sharma of SB A/ c No. 19923 allegedly made a complaint about delay in crediting the amount in her account and that she handed over the counterfoil of the Pay- in-slipdated 18-07-1996 for Rs . 10,000/-. The falsehood in the report of MW - 1 became apparent when she herself came in the witness box and stated that she had not made any complaint . She also stated that she did not offer the counterfoil to the Senior Manager MW - 1 , Shri K.L. Mallya . Eventually, the Enquiry Officer had no other alternative but to exonerate the workman of this charge.

It was at a much later stage that a photocopy of the undated complaint of Surinder Kumar was given to the workman in connection with charge sheet dated 28-01-1997 but it does not state that the amount was handed over to the workman by way of deposit . The management was not showing the pay - in- slip against

The 2nd charge clearly depended on the evidence of one Shri Abdul Alim, account holder of SB A/ c. No.

8977 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

That with regard to charge No. 3 relating to the amount of Rs. 6,600/- in the account of Shri Surinder Kumar it was necessary for the management to prove the hand-writing of the author of the counterfoil of the pay- in- slip as well as the signatures . The original of the counterfoil was not produced .

18384. He did not agree to make a statement as per the wishes of the Senior Manager and other officials in order to falsely involve the workman. However, when he realized that he was being harassed and he was asked to wait continuously for long time and the enquiry proceedings were deliberately not held so as to record his statement he sent a letter stating the factual position about the actual date of deposit of sum of Rs . 30,000/- . In his case as well no such document was produced that he made any complaint . The letter written by the said witness , although taken on record but the same was intentionally and deliverately put aside and omitted to be considered . On that charge as well , it is clear case that the amount was actually deposited by the account holder on 20-07- 1996 and not on 19-07-1996 .

The management- respondent has filed written statement . In the Written Statement it has been stated that the workman applicant has committed serious mis- conduct . He has temporarily embezzled Rs . 6,600/- on 20-07-1996 and on 18-07-1996 Rs . 10,000/-from the Saving Bank Account Nos . 5511 219923. The said amounts were credited on 13-08-1996 and on 19-07-1996 . He temporarily embezzled Rs . 30,000/- of Saving Bank Account No. 18384. In this way on three occasions the workman applicant has temporarily embezzled the above said three amounts of the three different accounts holders . Chargesheet was served on him and inquiry was held. He fully participated in the inquiry . The contention of the workman that the complainants of these cases were not examined during the inquiry proceedings is immaterial . It has been held in AIR in 1997 SC 1512 and AIR 1982 SC 673 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that non examination ofthe complainant is not material in case there is prima- facie and conlusive evidence against the deliquent . It has been further stated that in AIR 1997 SC 1512 and AIR 1982 SC 673 and 2003 CLR 839 the Hon'ble Supreme Court has categorically laid down that non examination of the complainant would not vitiate the inquiry.

The account holder Shri Abdul Alim himself stated that he actually deposited the amount on 20-07-1996. Therefore, there was no occasion for the management to level any charge against the workman in this behalf. That without prejudice to the above contention the Enquiry Officer willfully and deliberately failed to take notice of the fact that the alleged sum of Rs. 6,600/- was not taken by the workman from the account holder on 20-07-1996 . The counterfoil does not bear the signatures ofthe workman. As per the factual position which came out subsequently, the counterfoil bears the signatures of one of the peon in the Branch Shri Harish Kumar, who may have accepted the amount from the account holder but did not deposit the same .

Without showing the counterfoil and without enabling the workman to verify the position , and by deploying the tactics of coercion, misrepresentation etc. , the workman was asked to make depost of the amount ofRs . 6,600/ -from his pocket. The counterfoil bearing the signatures / initials of some other individuals , a peon of the Branch Shri Harish Kumar came to light later on . Even he has not been examined in evidence by the management during the course of enquiry . Unless the counterfoil in respect of the amount of Rs . 6,600/- is proved on record with reference to the signatures of the persons who put on the counterfoil, it could neither be presumed nor treated to be proved that the workman had accepted the sum of Rs. 6,600/- on 20-07-1996 .

It has been further stated that proper inquiry was held and all the documents were supplied to the workman applicant and all the documents have been proved by thewitriesses in the inquiry. The workman applicant fully participated in the inquiry and he was defended by his DR. He was given copy of the inquiry report and Show Cause Notice. The disciplinary authority awarded the punishment of dismissal from service w.e.f. 13-06-1998 and the appellate authority confirmed it. As such the grounds given by the workman applicant for quashing the inquiry proceedings are meaningless. The inquiry officer was never prejudiced. The findings of the Enquiry Officer was proved based on cogent evidence . The temporary embezzlement of Rs . 10,000/- have not been found proved by the Enquiry Officer so the punishment was awarded on Charge Nos . 2 & 3 after hearing the workman applicant . The Enquiry Officer has given his findings on all the three charges separately and he has assigned cogent reasons for upholding the charges levelled against the EPA. The findings of the Enquiry Officer is fair. No interference is required . The workmar applicant has been afforded proper opportunity to defend himself. He was served a Show Cause Notice prior to chargesheet and after considering his reply the charges were framed against him. He has been afforded If some person collected the amount representing himself to be a representative or an employee of the Bank in the Branch and delivers the counterfoils under his signature without the knowledge of the workman , it could not be said that the workman had received the amount . That the Enquiry Officer could not record a finding of guilt on charge Nos. 2 & 3 merely on suspicion and especially when direct evidence was available in the shape of statement of the account holders , but the same was deliberately not examined even though cited as witnesses .

8978

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)) opportunity to defend himself. The case of the claimant is liable to be dismissed .

The claimant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder he has denied most of the paras of the written statement and has reiterated the averments of his claim . The management has also denied almost all the paras of the statement of claim .

Officer as it is in no way connected with the deposit of Rs. 30,000/-. The findings of the Enquiry Officer regarding charge No. 2 are based on ME 6 ME 7 whereas these two papers do not relate to charge No. 2. They relate to charge No. 1which was found not proved. So the Enquiry Officer has placed relevance on ME 6 & ME 7 wrongly as on the basis of ME 6 and ME 7 the charge of temporary embezzlement cannot be proved.

Both the parties have adduced evidence. They have been cross examined by each other. The preliminary issue of fairness of the inquiry was not pressed before me, as such the award is given on the entire merits of the case. Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record. It was submitted from the side of the workman that charge No. 1 is regarding temporary embezzlement of Rs . 10,000/- and it has been mentioned in the charge that the customer complained about the delay in remittance of Rs. 10,000/- in her account number on 19-07-1996 but so far as charge No. 1 is concerned, the Enquiry Officer did not find the charge proved as the counterfoil produced by the P.O. was not clear as to the date of receipt of the cash by the Cashier.

CHARGE NO . 2

Itwas further submitted from the side of the workman that No. 388 is the Shroff Cash Book of 19-07- 1996 and on Sl . No. 23 30,000/- has been deposited. Though there is cutting on some serial in the middle but the serial no . of the first part and the last part are correct and there is no cutting on the amount calculated at the end of the paper as such Shroff Cash Book Sl. No. 388 cannot be considered concocted/ interpolated paper . ME 8 is the photocopy of the account of Abdul Alim, A/ C . No. 1838. Rs. 30,000/- has been deposited on 20-07-1996 so the Enquiry Officer has concluded that the amount was received on 19-07-1996. It may be that the amount was entered in the Shroff Cash Book on 19-07-1996. It is not necessary that entry in the Pass Book is made on the same day. Cash of Rs. 30,000/- may have been received on 19-07-1996 and it may have been entered into Pass Book of the account holder on 20-07-1996 so ME 8 is also not cogent proof that money was deposited on 19-07-1996 .

Charge No. 2 is regarding temporary embezzlement of Rs . 30,000/- It has been alleged that the workman applicant received Rs . 30,000/- on 19-07-1996 but he deposited the same on 20-07-1996 and not on 19-07-1996. As such the EPA has temporarily embezzled an amount of Rs . 30,000/- for one day .

Ihave persued the findigns of the Enquiry Officer. The Enquiry Officer has not given the findings that the guilt of temporary embezzlement is proved but he has given the finding that gross misconduct is proved.

It was contended from the side of the workman that the E.O. has based his report on ME 6, NE 7 and ME 8. According to the E.O.ME 6 is the Shroff Cash Book on which the amount was entered and on ME 6 he held the EPA guilty of gross misconduct. ME 6 is not paper regarding deposit of Rs . 30,000/ - ME 7 is also not the paper regarding deposit of Rs. 30,000/- so the findings of the E.O. are not supported by the papers referred to by him in his findings ME 6, ΜΕ 7 .

The E.O. on page 81 of the inquiry proceeding has stated :-

"On analyzing ME 6 & ME 8 it is evident that the amount of Rs . 30,000/- was taken into account by the Cashier the EPA only on 20-07-1996 and not on 19-07- 1996. Slip ME 3 dated 19-07-1996. .MW IInd has marked that the CSE was negligent while perfornung cash duties his involvement cannot be ruled out " .

It isapparent from this observation of the E.O. that he based his findings on ME 6 and concluded that the amount was deposited on 20-07-1996 and it was received on 19-07-1996. Paper No. ME 6 is not at all relevant as it is regarding the deposit of Rs . 10,000/- regarding which the charge was not found proved by the Enquiry Officer. ME 7 has also been wrongly relied on by the Enquiry

Itwas contended from the side of the workman that in case it is assumed that the money of Rs . 30,000/ - was deposited on 20-07-1996 in that case also there is no question of embezzlement of the amount. The EPA has himself deposited the money, there is no complaint from any side and nobody asked him to deposit the said amount on 20-07-1996. The EPA has automatically deposited the said amount . It niay be that he received the amount at the last working hours and he promised the account holder to deposit it at the next day but he gave him receipt of the same of 19-07-1996 instead of 20-07-1996. The account holders are acquainted with the cashier and some times they come to the Bank when the account is closed. In that case also their amount is received and cash receipt is given with the promise that the amount will be deposited the next day and the receipt of the next day is also given. At the utmost the EPO has committed negligence in issuing of cash receipt of 19-07-1996, so it is minor negligence , there is no intention of committing any misconduct . If an employee has any criminal intentions he would not deposit the money himself on the next day as such the intention of mis - appropriation is not even implied. The workman applicant has acted in good faith. He has committed a mistake rather भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

topographical mistake of writing 19 at the place of 20. Whenthe matter came to light after one month the amount was already deposited on 20-07-1996.

CHARGE NO . 3

It was further submitted that the charge no. 3 is regarding temporary embezzlement of Rs . 6,600/ - . It is alleged that the slip dated 19-07-1996 was issued along with the seal and signature of the EPA, but that money was accounted to the account of the account holder on 13-08-1996 . The EPA received the amount on 19-07-1996 and he deposited it on 13-08-1996 so he embezzled the said amount. The Enquiry Officer found the charge proved as according to his version the money received on 19-07-1996 was deposited in the account holder's account on 13-08-1996 . As such , the CSE was found negligent while performing cash duties .

The third charge is regarding temporary embezzlement of Rs . 6,600/-. It has been alleged that Rs . 6,600/- was received on 19-07-1996 and on the counterfoil there is seal of the Bank and nobody has done initial on the slip . So the Enquiry Officer concluded that the receipt was issued by the Cashier as he was incharge of the cash and it was his duty to receive cash for depositing in the account of the account holders but the said amount was deposited on 13-08-1996 . The Enquiry Officer found the charge levelled against the CSE proved.

It was contended from the side of the workman applicant that the findings of the Enquiry Officer are not based on evidence on the record . The amount of Rs . 6,600/- was deposited on 19-07-1996 as per the photocopy of the counterfoil but there is no signature of the workman applicant on this counterfoil . There appears to be a signature but that is certainly not of the workman applicant as compared to his signature on the other counterfoils under reference. It was stated from the side of the workman applicant that the peon received the cash and he put his signature and seal on the counterfoil and gave one part to the account holder. The other part of the receipt has not been produced by the complainant and he did not file the same and he has made no complaint and he has not appeared in the witness box. It is of course true that the workman had been discharging the cashier's duty on that day but the employee was not expected to sit on the chair from 10.00 AM to 5.00 PM. He has to goto attend the call of nature . It was contended that when the workman applicant was absent . the peon received the cash and put his signature and seal on both (he foils . The workman applicant did not receive the cash ofRs . 6,600/- so he did not put his signature. It is quite natural that no account holder will receive the receipt without any signature and there is signature of some other person on the counterfoil dated 20-07-1996 . It has not been verified whether the peon has put his signature over the counterfoil dated 20-07-1996 by which the cash 3422 GI/ 04-45

8979 ofRs . 6,600/- was received . The Learned Counsel for the workman argued that the signature is denied. The Bank was duty bound to prove it by taking the signature of the peon concerned but the Bank has not done so . So far as signature is concerned oral evidence is not sufficient. From my perusal it transpires that there is signature on the counterfoil but is not the signature of the CSE.

It was argued that it has come in evidence that when the workman applicant was pressed he deposited Rs . 6,600/- from his own pocket under the direction of the Branch Manager of the Bank and there is mention of the same on the receipt of the deposit as such the workman did not deposit Rs . 6,600/ - of his own sweet will but he was suspended and assurance was given that a lenient view will be taken. So under pressure he deposited the amount . It was submitted from the side of the management that had he not received the amount , he would not have deposited it . Mere deposit of Rs . 6,600 / - at the direction of the Branch Manager is not itself a sufficient proof that the workman applicant has received Rs . 6,600/- from the customer . There is no signature of the workınan applicant on the counterfoil and no witness has deposed that he saw the workman receiving money from the customer on a particular date so it cannot be said that he received the amount . The report of expert in such circumstance is the only evidence as Rs . 6,600 /- has been written on the counterfoil and it has been certainly written by some other person as the account counter holder's writing is different.

From the above discussions it is quite obvious that Rs . 6,600/- has been written by person less educated. If there is allegation that the workman applicant has not received Rs . 6.600 / - and he has not issued any receipt . in the circumstanees it was necessary for the management to get the writing Rs. 6,600/ - verified by some experts . The findings of the Enquiry Officer is not correct that there is seal of the Bank so the workman applicant has received the money . Had there been only the seal in that case it can be presumed that the workman received the cash and put the seal but he did not put his signature but there appears to be two writings on the counterfoil , as such two persons have written on the counterfoil . On may be of the account holder but the other may be of some other person, who is that other person . has not been ascertained by the Enquiry Officer . So the finding of the Enquiry Officer is not based on any cogent evidence and the inference drawn by hint is not correct . A man of prudence could not have arrived at the conclusion without the writing being verified and without even soine oral evidence of receiving money and putting seal and writting Rs . 6,600/- so the charge has been found proved on the basis of conjecture .

I have gone through the inquiry proceedings and the findings of the Enquiry Officer. It was submitted from 8980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii),

prepared on 19-07-1996 at serial No. 388. The same cannot be prepared on 20-07-1996 as such there appears to be concoction/ interpolation by some interested persons. The Enquiry Officer has relied upon ME 7 but it is not Shroff Cash Book . ME 6, ME 7 and ME 8 are not originals they are the photocopy of the Shroff Cash Book . The Enquiry Officer has relied upon ME 6 but it is regarding deposit ofRs . 10,000/ - and not of Rs . 30,000/- and Charge No. 1 has not been found proved so ME 6 is not regading the deposit of Rs . 30,000/- . ME 6 is regarding deposit of Rs . 10,000/- . From ME 8 it is apparent that Rs . 30,000/- was included in the account of Abdul Halim , A/C . No. 1838 on 20-07-1996 and Abdul Halim has not appeared in the witness box but he has said that he has paid the amount on 20-07-1996 and it has been entered in ME 8 on 20-07-1996. The Shroff Cash Book of 20-07-1996 , ΜΕ 6 is on the record but it is not regarding the deposit of Rs. 30,000 /- ME 6 is regarding the deposit of Rs. 10,000/- . I have gone through the findings of the enquiry Officer and so far as charge No. 2nd is concerned papers referred to are ME 6 &ME 8 but ME 6 is not relevant as there is no date on this paper and Rs . 30,000/- has not been mentioned in this Shroff Cash Book as it is not clear how the Enquiry Officer based his findings on ME 6. It appears that he has overlooked ME 6 and found charge no . 2nd proved on the basis of ME 6. The photocopy paper is not even dated.

There is date of 20-07-1996 but this is photocopy of the account of Abdul Alim is entered in the ledger is not in every case made on the same date so it is doubtful whether the account was deposited on 19-07-1996 or 20-07-1996 as there is no Shroff Cash Book of 20-07-1996 and the Shroff Cash Book which is of 19-07-1996 and Shroff Cash Book of which Rs . 30,000/- has been deposited is of 19-07-1996 . As such it appears that the amount was deposited on 19-07-1996.

the side of the workman that No. 388 of Canara Bank particulars of receipt has been filed alongwith the inquiry proceedings and on No. 23 Rs . 30,000/- has been entered on 19-07-1996 itself. It is at serial No. 23 whereas the Enquiry Officer has given his findings that on analyzing ME 6 and ME 8 it is evident that the amount of Rs . 30,000/ - was taken into account by the Cashier, the EPA on 20-07-1996 and not on 19-07-1996 , ME 3 is the slip dated 19-07-1996 . The signature of the EPA is quiet clear and he has admitted his signature. The cash was taken on 19-07-1996 and as per ME 6 & ME 8 it was deposited on 20-07-1996 and not on 19-07-1996. In this connection ME 6 , ΜΕ 8 & ME 3 are important papers , ME 6 is the paper on which no date has been given and there is deposit of Rs . 10,000/- on ME 6. The counterfoil is ME 5 dated 19-07-1996 and there is signature of the EPA so the Enquiry Officer has looked at ME 3 instead ofME 5. Accordingto him ME 6 and ME 8 indicate that amount was deposited on 20-07-1996 , there is no date and there is no deposit of Rs . 30,000/ - as alleged so the Enquiry Officer has not perused ME 5 and ME 6 and without perusal of the records he has concluded that Rs . 30,000/ - was deposited on 20-07-1996 as per ME 6. There is also a paper on which there is no ME and from perusal of that paper it transpires that Rs . 30,000/ - was deposited on 19-07-1996at serial No. 23. There is also a paper of 20-07-1996 on which at serial No. 44 Rs. 30,000 /- has been deposited but this paper is not ME 7 , ME 6 or ME 8. It appears that the Enquiry Officer has reached his findings without perusal of ME 6 , ME 7 and ME 8. It is of course true that on 20-07-1996 Rs . 30,000 /- has been deposited at serial No. 44 but the paper has not been proved by the witness and there is no exhibit on this paper. its number is 392 whereas there is also a photocopy of 388 dated 19-07-1996 and at serial no. 23 Rs. 30,000/ - has been deposited . In serial No. 388 is taken into account Rs . 30,000 /- has been deposited on 19-07-1996 itself. There is cutting on serial no . 17 , 18, 19, 20 , 21 , 22, 23 , 24 , 25 but there is no cutting on 26 , 27 , 28 & 29. It was contended that one serial number may have been missed so there is cutting but the last scrial nos . 26 , 27, 28 & 29 are without any overwriting . There is no question of interpolation of Rs . 30.000 /- at serial No. 23 because this page contains upto serial No. 29 and amount is Rs . 2,70,975/ - and there is no cutting in the total amount . In case Rs . 30,000/- had been interpolated later on then there is bound to be overwriting on the total amount so it cannot be said that Rs. 30.000/- was not deposited on 19-07-1996 . The serial number of the paper dated 20-07-1996 is 44 and Rs. 30,000/ - has been entered at serial No. 44 but the scrial number , of the Bank paper is 392 whercas serial number of the paper

dated

19-07-1996 is 388. There is no mention of the date . Serial No. 390 and serial No. 391 has not been filed.

The Shroff Cash Book No. 392 is dated 20-07-1996 but it has not been exhibited . The Enquiry Officer has relied upon ME 6 to ME 8 , ME 6 is not regarding deposit of Rs . 30,000/- and no date has been given on this paper . ME 7 is regarding deposit of Rs . 10,000 /- about which the findings of the Enquiry Officer is that the charge regarding deposit of Rs . 10,000/ - is not proved so he has relied upon ME 6 to ME 8 whereas ME 6 & ME 7 has nothing to do with deposit of Rs. 30,000 /- ME 8 is regarding deposit of Rs . 30,000/ - dated 20-07-1996 itself but the money which is deposited on 20-07-1996 cannot be entered in the account of the account holder on the same day. The originals have not been provided for my perusal. The findings of the Enquiry Officer regarding charge not . 2nd is based not ME 6 , ME 7 and ME 8 wheareas ME 6 and ME 7 are not the relevant papers regarding the charge ME 8 is the paper of the deposit .

From the perusal of these papers it transpires that the Shroff Cash Book is prepared cveryday. If it was

The workman applicant was suspended on 13-08-1996 . As such the matter regarding temporary 8981 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

same have not been proved. The enquiry officer has wrongly based his findings on ME 6 and ME7 whereas these are not related to the deposit of the amount of Rs. 30,000. So it is still doubtful as to when the said amount was deposited. So the findings of the enquiry officer that the amount of Rs . 30,000 was taken on 19- 07-1996 and was deposited on 20-07-1996 is absolutely wrong, being based on no documentary evidence on the record . The management appears do have concocted the Shroff Cash Books of 19-07-1996 and 20-07-1996. As such the findings of the enquiry officer of Charge No. 2 is absolutely baseless and the same cannot be upheld. There must be some documentary evidence or oral evidence on which finding is to be based. The enquiry officer has given findings on assumption and conjecture . Charge No. 2 is not proved by any evidence .

Charge No. 3 is not proved as the workman applicant has not received Rs. 6,600 from the account holder. He cannot be held responsible for the amount which he has not received as discussed above so Charge No. 3 is not proved as there is no evidence of receiving the amount of Rs. 6,600 by the workman applicant . Charge No. 1 regarding of Rs . 10,000 has not been found proved by the enquiry officer himself.

It is of course true that non - examination of the complainant will not vitiate the inquiry as has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court . There should be sufficient cogent evidence to prove the charges levelled against the EPA. Charge No. 1 regarding Rs . 10,000 has not been found proved by the Enquiry Officer. Charge No. 2nd regarding deposit of Rs. 30,000 is not proved as discussed above . Charge No. 3 regarding Rs. 6,600 is also not found proved as discussed above . The Enquiry Officer has not given his findings based on the evidence on the record so the enquiry is not fair . The workman applicant deserves to be reinstated with full back wages .

The reference is replied thus :-

The action of the Dy. General Manager , Canara Bank, Circle Officer , Marshall House , Nehru Place , New Delhi is dismissing from scrvices w.c.f. 13-06-1998 of Shri Naresh Kumar Gupta (31732 ) is neither justified, nor proper and valid . The workman applicant deserves to be reinstated w.c.f. 13-06-1998 with full back wages . The bank is directed to reinstate Shri Naresh Kunar Gupta w.e.f. 13-06-1998 within one month after publication of the award alongwith full back wages . In case of default the workman applicant will be entitled to get interest of 6% on the entire back wages .

The award is given accordingly.

Dated: 14-10-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer embezzlement and charge sheet was issued to him on 28th January, 1997. Amonut of Rs. 10,000/- was received on 18-07-1996 and it was entered into Shroff Cash Book on 19-07-1996 . A cash of Rs . 30,000 was allegedly received on 19-07-1996 and it was admittedly deposited on 20-07-1996 . As such the matter came to light when the amount was already deposited without the knowledge of the management and there is no complaint regarding the same. The workman applicant has himself deposited the aforesaid two amounts after one day according to the allegation of the management . Had there been any intention of temporary embezzlement , the workman applicant could not have deposited the same the next day as such by no stretch of imagination there is any intention of misappropriation by the workman applicant . At the worst there may be clerical mistake . No employee could retain any amount for one night and deposit the same the next day without coming to the notice of the management. There is neither any complaint of the account holders nor of the management prior to 13-08-1996. So these two transactions had taken place without the knowledge of the complainant and the management. The EPA had deposited the said two amounts the next day as such no intention even of temporary embezzlement could be gathered. The charge regarding the amount of Rs . 10,000 has not been found proved by enquiry officer as the date of the receipt is not clear. The charge regarding the deposit of Rs . 30,000 is also not proved as the enquiry officer has based the finding on ME 6 and ME 7. ME 6 is regarding the deposit of Rs . 10,000 and ME 7 is regarding the deposit of Rs . 10,000 in the account of the account 0 1 e r d h Ms. Om Shree Sharma. So ME 6 and ME 7 are the papers which are not concerned with the deposit of Rs . 30,000 . As such there is no Shroff Cash Book of deposit of Rs . 30,000 which has been proved by any witness. The enquiry officer has based his findings on Charge No. 2 on ME 6 and ME 7 which are not the relevant papers for the charge of late deposit of Rs . 30,000 . As such the findings of the enquiry officer is not based on any paper which has been proved by the management witness . There is Shroff Cash Book of 20-07-1996 which is numbered as 392. There is deposit of Rs. 30,000/ - in it but it has not been proved by any witness and no exhibit mark has been given to it. As such from the evidence of the witnesses during the enquiry it has not been proved that Rs . 30,000 was deposited on 19-07-1996 or 20-07-1996 . The matter is quite doubtful and it appears that Shroff Cash Book No. 392 has been forged. There are two Shroff Cash Books one of 19-07-1996 and the other is 20-07-1996 . These two Shroff Books have not been proved by any witness during the proceedings of the enquiry. These

two Shroff Cash Books are the relevant papers but the 8982

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] नई दिल्ली, 29 अक्तूबर, 2004

AWARD

1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause ' D ' of Sub- sections 1 and 2 (A) to Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (herein after referred to as the ' Act ' ) has referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under :-

का.आ. 3053.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मेनेजमेन्ट ऑफ नेशनल काउनसील फॉर टीचर ऐजुकेशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जयपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी. 18/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

7 [सं० एल.-42012/188/2002 - आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ]

"Whether the action of the management of National Council for Teacher Education in terminating the services ofworkman Shri Mohan Lal Sharma S/ o Sh. Gajanand w.e.f. 20-8-96 and appointing his juniors is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?" एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th October, 2004

S.O. 3053. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. CGIT- 18 /2003 of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Jaipur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of National Council for Teacher Education, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-10-2004.

[No. L -42012 / 188/ 2002 - IR (CM- II)]

2. The workman in his statement of claim has pleaded that he was initially appointed to the post of 4th Class as casual labour on 26-12-95 on the consolidated wages of Rs . 1600/- per month, who continuously worked up to 20-8-96 . But on 20-8-96 , he was removed from the service by an oral order, whereas the junior persons to him , viz . , Sh . Rakesh, Sh. Rajesh and Sh. Manoj were retained by the nmanagement . His averment is that he had completed 240 days in the calendar year preceding to his termination , but his service was terminated in violation of Section 25 - f of theAct.

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

5 BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT JAIPUR

Case No. CGIT- 18/2003

Reference No. L- 42012/ 188/ 2002 ( IR (CM- II)

Sh . Mohan Lal Sharma, S/o Sh. Gajanand, R/ o Kejroli , Tehsil-Chomu, Distt . Jaipur

....Applicant

Versus

3. The non -appliants , in their written counter, have disputed the claim and have stated that the claimant is not a workman and the non- applicant management is not an industry as defined under the provision of the Act . They have further stated that the claimant was appointed as a casual worker in two different spell , first spell was w.e.f. 26-12-95 for a period of 59 days and in the second spell w.e.f. 4-4-96 to 28-6-96 . He was engaged for a specific period with the conditions stipulated in the offer of appointment and the said termination is a result of non - renewal of the contract and hence, his case is attracted under Section 2( 00) (bb) of the Act . They have also denied that junior employees to the claimant were retained by the management .

Management of National Council for

4. In the rejoinder, the workman has reiterated the facts as stated in the statement of claim.

1 Teacher Education, North. Regional Office, 16. M.G. Road, Indraprastha State. New Delhi

5. On the pleadings of both the parties, the following points for determination were framed:-

2. Regional Director.

National Council for Teacher Education . A-46 . Tilak Nagar.

7 Shanti Path , Jaipur.

Non - applicants

Present:

Presiding Officer

Sh . R.C. Sharma

I. Whether the workman was appointed as Class IV employee on consolidated pay of Rs. 1600/ - per month on 26-12-95 by the non- applicant management , who continued to work under the employment of non - applicant No. 2 up to 20-8-96 and thus had completed over 240 days in a calendar year? BOA Forthe applicant

Sh . B.M. Sharma

For the non - applicants : Sh. V.S. Gurjar

Date of award

: 30-9-2004

Whether the service of the workman was terminated in violation of Section 25 - f of the ID Act? BOA 8983 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

HI. Whether after the termination of the workman , junior employees to him viz . Sh . Rakesh and Sh. Rajesh were retained by the management ?

BOA

2(oo)(bb) of the Act . According to his contention, the workman has completed only 229 days . In support of his submission, the ld. representative has placed his reliance upon ( 1997) 11 SCC 521 ; (2001 ) 5 SCC 540 and (2002) 5 SCC 654.

IV. Whether the workman is not covered by the difinition of the ' workman ' as defined under Section 2 - S of the ID Act ? BONA

11. The workman in his affidavit has narrated the facts as stated in his claim statement who has deposed in his cross - examination that he was appointed on 26-12-95 for a period of 89 days, which were completed on 24-3-96 and thereafter he continued to work up to 20-8-96 .

V Whether the management of National Council for Teacher Education does not fall within the definition of ' industry ' as given under Section 2-J of the ID Act? BONA

VI To what relief, if any, the workman is entitled to?

6. In the evidence , the workman has submitted his affidavit and on behalf of the non - applicants, the affidavit ofMW - 1 , Sh . Anil Kumar, the Officer in - charge , has been brought on the record. Both the parties have also led the documentary evidence on the record.

7. I have heard both the parties and have scanned the record . The point - wise discussion follows as under:- Point Nos . I & II

12. In the documentary evidence , he has brought on the record the various documents . Ex . A - 1 is the appointment letter dated 26-12-95 which says that Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma is appointed as assistant employee on ad hoc basis for a period of 89 days or till such time the regular incumbent is appointed, whichever is earlier. By the order dated 2-1-96 Ex. A-2 , his pay was fixed at the consolidated sum of Rs . 1660/- per month w.e.f. 26-12-95 . Ex. A- 3 is the experience certificate dated 20-3-96 stating that Sh . Mohan Lal is working w.e.f. 26-12-95 in this office. The next relevant document on the point is the appointment letter Ex. A- 13 dated 3-4-96 which says that Sh. Mohan Lal isappointed as casual worker w.e.f. 3-4-96 to 20-8-96 or till such time the regular incumbent joints, whichever is earlier .

8. For the sake of convenience, both these points are discussed together.

9. The Id. representative for the workman contends thatthe workman was appointed as 4th Class on 26-12-95 who continuously worked up to 20-8-96 . The Id . representative in support of his contention has relied upon the appointment letter Ex . A- 1 , letter for fixing the pay of theworkman Ex. A-2 , the experience letter dated 20-3-96Ex. A-3 and the appointment letter Ex. A- 13 dated 3-4-96. His submission is that thus the workman has completed 240 days ofemployment with the non - applicant management . The 1d. representative has drawn my attention towards the unreportable decision dated 12-4-96 delivered by the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the matter of DB Civil SpecialAppeal , Writ No. 571 of 1994, Jagdish Prasad Sharma v. Jaipur Development Authority which was further affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court vide its order dated 2-9-96 .

13. From the aforesaid documents , it is crystal clear that the workman had joined the department on 26-12-95 fora period of 89 days which come to an end on 23-3-1996 . Ex.A-3 dated 20-3-96, the experience certificate states that the workman is working in the office w.e.f. 26-12-95 , which shows that this certificate was issued prior to the completion of the 89 days on 23-3-96 . If, therefore , follows that the workman vide appointment letter Ex. A- 1 had worked for a specific period , viz. , from 26-12-95 to 23-3-96 for a total period of 89 days . It appears that after the gap of about ten days , on 3-4-96 the workman was again employed vide appointment letter Ex. A- 13 whereby he was engaged for a stipulated period w.e.f. 3-4-96 to 20-8-96, which works out of 140 days . Thus , on reckoning both these spells , the total number of days comes to 229 days only. On the strength of these appointment letters , the workman has claimed that he had completed 240 days of employment and was continuously working w.e.f. 26-12-95 . Contraryto his oral evidence , the documentary evidence led by him leads to infer that he had worked only for a period of 229 days in two different spells . There is no evidence , oral or documentary , adduced on behalf of the workman on the record which goes to establish that the workman has completed 240 days of work in the calendar year preceding to his date of termination . Thus , the workman on factshas failed to prove the factum of completion of 240 days of employment with the management.

10. Controverting this submission, the Id . representative for the management contends that the appointment of the workman was made for a specific period stipulating the conditions thereof by both these appointment letters . These appointsments were made for two different spells and the stipulations are incorporated therein . Since the appointments were made for a specific periodand after the expiry of that, the employment of the workman came to an end by virtue of non - renewal of the contract . His next contention is that the period of employment has been wrongly reckoned on behalf of the workman who had not completed 240 days and the retrenchment is not attracted in the present case but the termination of the workman falls within the ambit of Section

14. In Jagdish Prasad Sharma v. Jaipur Development Authority, the unreportable judgement referred to on behalf of the workman, the Hon'ble Court has held that in the order of the appointment of the workman , it is nowhere 8984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] stated that on the expiry of the period of six months the employment would automatically come to an end in view ofthe specific condition in the order of appointment that the service couldbe terminated at any time without notice , it cannot be construed to be a contract of employment for a fixed period. Therefore, Clause (bb ) of Section 2 ( 00 ) of the ID Act is not attracted.

17. The facts of this case are squarcly applicable to the controversy at hand and the principles propounded in the decisions supra strengthen the submission made on behalf of the management . In the light of the oral and documentary evidence and the legal position discussed above, the workman has failed to prove that the termination of the workman tantamounts to retrenchment and it is found that his case is covered by the Section 2( oo ) (bb ) of the Act. Accordingly, he is not entitled for the protection of Section 25 - F of the Act and both these points are decided against the workman and in favour of the management .

Point No. III

18. The Id. representative for the workman contends that after the termination of the workman , the fresh hands were recruited by the management. The Id . representative, in this context, has relied upon the offer of appointment Ex . A-3 made to Sh . Manoj Kumar, appointment order of Sh. Rakesh Kumar , Ex. A - 4 and transfer order of Sh . Rajesh Kumar, Ex. A -5 .

15. By contrast, in ( 1997) 11 SCC 521 , the decision. relied upon by the Id. representative for the management , the workman was appointed for a specific period of two months and the terms of appointment were enabling the employer to terminate the service at any stage without assigning any reason . The Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that the service of the workman was terminated on 13-2-87 as per the terms of contract of employment contained in the appointment letter which enabled the employer to terminate the service of the workman at any state without assigning any reason . Since the service of the workman was terminated as per the terms of the contract of employment , it does not amount to retrenchment.

19. On the contrary, the Id. representative for the management has urged that these orders of appointment/ transfer were issued by the Head Office , which are regular appointments and the workman cannot have any grievance against these appointments because the non - applicant has not made any appointment .

16. In the another case cited in (2001 ) 5 SCC 540 , referred to on behalf of the management , the Hon'ble Court has held that the production of Section 25 - F of the Act is not applicable in the case of termination of service on expiry ofcontract of service for a fixed period. Similarly, in ( 2002) 5 SCC 654 , the question of applicability of Section 2( oo) ( bb) and Section 25 -F arose before the Hon'ble Apex Court . The facts thereof are that the employer was engaged in the business of procurement and supply of whcat who appointed the workmen for watching the stock of wheat lying in open area , who were appointed on contract basis as daily wagers till the disposal of the stock or for the period specified in the contract. Their services were terminated after the clearance of the stock and on facts it was held that the terinination of their services docs not amount to retrenchment although they were effected without complying with Scction 25 - F of the Act. The observation made by the Hon'ble Court is quoted as below:-

"In such a case the question of complying with the conditions precedent to retrechment of a workman provided in Section 25 - F of the Act will not arise . In the present case , the Lahour Court relying on the oral anddocumentary evidence cited on behalf of the management , particularly the order of the Managing Director sanctioning the engagement of the workmen concerned , held that the engagement/ appointment of the workmen concerned was for a specific purpose and for a particular period and since the purpose fortheir engagement/ appointment was over and the period of appointment had expired , their disengagement was in terms of the contract of service , and therefore , not a " retrenchment " within the meaning of Section 2( 00 ) of the Act. "

20. The workman has pleaded in his claim statement that after his removal from the service , other persons , viz... Rakesh Kumar, Rajesh Kumar and Manoj Kumar were appointed and were retained by the non - applicants without any reason . Therefore , he incans to say that after his termination the fresh hands were recruited by the management without affording him an opportunity of employment.Ex . A -3 is an offer of appointment dated 30-1-97 made to Sh . Manoj Kumar for the post of Farash- cum- Chowkidar, which has been issued by the Under Secretary, NCTE . New Delhi . Ex . A - 4 is the appointment letter dated 4-3-97 whereby Sh . Rakesh Kumar was appointed to the post of Chowkidar. It has also been issued by the same authority. Thereafter Ex. A - 5 is the order of appointment dated 1-3-99 , whereby Sh. Rajesh Kumar . Peon in the office of NCTE , Bhuvaneshwar was transferred to the non- applicant department . It has also been issued by the headquarters at Delhi . On a scrutiny of these appointment/ transfer orders , it appears that the appointment of Sh . Manoj Kumar and Sh . Rakesh Kumar were made on the regular basis by the headquarters and their case is entirely different to that of the workman who was engaged on the basis of a contract for employment for a specified period and who had not completed 240 days of service in a calendar year under the management . Hence, the workntan has failed to prove that the fresh appointments were made by the management to the post on which he was appointed . As such , the contention canvassed on behalf of the workman is not tenable and is rejected.

8985 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Accordingly, this point is decided against the workman and in favour of the management .

Point No. IV

27. The ld. representative for the workman has drawn my attention towards the decision cited in AIR 1978 SC 548 wherein the Hon'ble Court has held that the universities and research institutes are industries. The Hon'ble Court has laid down the criteria as below :--

"The true test is the predominant nature of the activity. In the case of the university or an educational institution , the nature of the activity is , ex hypothesi , education which is a service to the community. Ergo , the university is an industry."

21. TheId. representative for the management contends that in view of Section 2( oo) ( bb) of the Act , the claimant was employed on the contractual basis for a specified period and on account of the non - renewal ofthat period, his engagement automatically came to an end . Therefore . he is not a workman as defined under Section 2-S of the Act . The ld . representative for the work man has opposed this submission.

28. The Hon'ble Apex Court has even observed that the research institutes which run without profit - motive arc industries . The relevant observation is quoted as below:-

22. Under the foregoing paragraphs . it has been concluded that the workman was employment on contractual basis for a specified period and on account of the non -renewal of the contract , his employment came to an end. Under these circumstances , it was a contract of service and the claimant does not fall within the ambit of Section 2 - S of the Act. Accordingly. this point is decided in favour of the management and against the workman .

Point No. V

"Even though a research institute may be a separate entity disconnected from the many industries which funded the institute itself, it can be regarded as an organization , propelledby systematic activity, modeled on co -operation between employer and employee and calculated to throw up discoveries and inventions and useful solutions which benefit individual industries and the nation in terms of good and services and wealth . It follows that research institutes , albeit run without profit - motive , are industries. "

29. The ld. representative for the workman derives assistance from the views expressed by the Hon ble Apex Court and on facts of instant case . it is held that the non- applicant establishment is an industry within the meaning of Section 2 - J of the Act . The contention advanced on behalf of the management is repelled and this point is accordingly decided in favour of the workman and against the management .

Point No. VI

23. The Id. representative for the management submits that this establishment cannot be considered to be an industry because the National Council for Teachers Education Act. 1993 confers sovereign functions to be carried out by the Council and the object of the Act is to run the teachers training and the NCTE has been cstablished with a view to achieve planned and guaranteed development of teacher education system throughout the country. It is also primarily intended to regulate the operation of teacher training institutions and ensure proper maintenance of high standards and execilence in such institutions .

30. For the foregoing reasons , the workman has failed to establish that he is entitled for the protection under Sections 25 - F and 25 -H of the Act . Accordingly, he is entitled to no relief.

24. Arguing contra . the Id . representative for the workınan contends that the institute is not a sovereign onc and it is also a source of income as has been admitted by the management witness .

31. In the result, the reference is answered in the negative against the workman and in favour of the management and it is held that the action of the management ofNCTE in terminating his service w.e. f. 20-8-1996 is legal andjustified and the claim of the workman is rejected. An award is passed in these terms accordingly.

25. Section 2 - J defines industry which means any business . trade. undertaking and includes any calling . service, employment of workmen. In the light of this provision , it is to be determined whether the non- applicant management falls within the definition of the industry or not?

32. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17 ( 1 ) of the Act. R.C. SHARMA. Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 29 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 3054.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , आसनसोल 26. The managementment has examined MW- 1, Sh . Anil Kumar, the officer in - charge of the case in support of this submission, who has admitted in his cross - examination that in the institute the training is imparted to the teachers and for according the recognition to the educational institutions . the institute charges Rs. 40.000 /- per course for this purpose ( he printed application forms are issued on the payment of Rs. 100/- as cost of cach form . He has further admitted in his cross - examination that the establishment is not a sovereign one .

8986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] ( संदर्भ संख्या 66/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, ज़ो केन्द्रीय सरकार को29-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 22012/ 497/99 /IR( C - II ) dated 27-07-2000 has been pleased to refer thefollowingdispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

[सं ० एल.- 22012/497/99- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi . the 29th October , 20t ) 4

"Whether the action of the management ofDamagoria Colliery under BCCL in denying to give effect of seniority of Sh. S. D. Gupta, Store Keeper, Grade- 1. w.e.f. 30-3-84 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled? "

After receipt of the above order of reference , summons were issued to the parties concerned by the Registered Post and in compliance ofthe said they appeared through their representatives and filed their respective written statement in support of their casc.

S.O. 3054. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947). the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 66/2000) of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court. Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of BCCL and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-10-2004.

[No. L -22012/497/ 99 - IR ( CM- II ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

2. The case of the delinquent workınan in brief compass as set forth in his written statement is that Sri S. D. Gupta. Attendance Clerk of Damagoria Colliery was deputed to work as Store Clerk to cater to work load prior to 1984 and lastly he was confirined and posted to work in the Store as Store Keeper w.e.f. 30-3-84 and as such as per the cadre scheme and norms of the company Sri Gupta is entitled to get wages and salary of clerical grade- lw.c.f. 30-3-84.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Md. Sarfaraz Khan Presiding Officer

Reference No. 66 of 2000

PARTIES:

Agent . Damagoria Colliery of M/ s. B.C.C.L... P.O. Kalyaneshwari .

Distt. Burdwan

3. The further case of the workman is that the issue was raised before the management of the said colliery who agreed to re -designate Sri S.D. Gupta as Store Keeper Gr. I w.c.f. 30-3-84 without any financial benefit and accordingly Dy. Chief Personnel Manager CV Arca had passed an office order vide letter No. DCP 14 /XII/03/A- 10/260 dated 21/22-1-94. But after seven months the management came back to the signed agreement without any consultation with the union and cancel the above said office order of 21/22-1-94 which is unjust illegal and improper.

Management

Versus

4. On the other hand the defence case of the management as per its written statement in brief is that the present dispute is not maintainable in the eye of law, Sri S.D. Gupta. Attendance Clerk. Damagoria Colliery represented Sri S. K. Singh . J.M.S. (Union)

Workman

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management : Sri P. K. Das . Advocate .

Forthe Workman

: Sri S. K. Singh . Br. Secretary, JantaMazdoor Sangh . Damagoria Colliery.

Industry: Coal

State: West Bengal

5. The main case of the management is that Sri S. D. Gupta, was in clerical Grade - III working as Tripman till 20-12-83, who was re-designated and regularised as attendance clerk in clerical Grade- 11 from 20-12-83 . He is said to had been authorised to work as additional Store Keeper and not a full - fledged Store Keeperw.c.f. 30-3-84. As per the cadre scheme 1.1 No. 34 dated 17-7-84 of the company a person can be promoted in clerical Grade- 1 only if he is a matriculate with five years experience as Asstt . Store Keeper in Clerical Grade-11.

Dated 22-09-2004

AWARD

In exercise of the power conferredby clause ( d ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Govt. of India.

6. The further case of the management is that Sri Guptawas promoted as Store Keeper in clerical Grade- las per vacancy from 4-12-90 on fulfilling the required cligibility criteria of a store cadre of the scheme. In the light of the above said pleaded facts the management has claimed that the workman is not entitled for any other benetit.

8987 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रह्मयण 6, 1926

[ भांग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7. On perusal of the record it transpires that there are certain admitted facts which need not be proved and discussed.

8. It is admitted fact that Sri S. D. Gupta was working as Attendance Clerk in Damagoria Colliery and ivas deputed to work as Store Clerk and subsequently he was authorised to work as additional Store Keeper with effect from 30-3-84.

andjustification of the case , to re-designate Sri S. D. Gupta as Store Keeper Gr. - I w.c.f. 30-3-84 without any financial benefit . The Dy . Chief Personnel Manager . CV Area vide its letter No. DCPM/X11/ 03 /B - 10/ 94/260 dated 21-1-94 issued an office order in this regard with the approval ofG.M. and re-designated Sri S. D. Gupta as Store Keeper .Gr . -1 with effect from 30-3-84 . The aforesaid both ( he office orders were issuedby the Management on the basis of duc consideration of the fact. circumstances and justification ofthe case of the workman andto that effect an agreement was prepared and duly signed by the Management and Union and accordingly these office orders were issued . So. it can't be said that both ( he authority who issued the aforesaid office order to give effectto the agreement reached between the management and union were a lay man and both the office orders suffer from the technical mistake .

13. Ext . 111 is an office order dated 12-8-94 issued from the office of the Dy . Chief Personnel Manager . CV Area through which previous office order No. DC'PM: XII 03:B-10: 94260 dated 1-2-94 ( Ext. 11) has been cancelled. This office order of cancellation has been issued just after lapse of seven months of the previous order ( Ext . 11 ) . It is also clear that this order was not issued with the consultation of the union nor any opportunity was given ( o union for Itearing before the cancellation of the previous order which was passed as per the agreement reach between ( he management and union . Besides this no cogent reason has been assigned to breach the agrecinent reached between the party which apparently does not appear to be just andproper and the same gives the smell ofvictimisation of the delinquent workman .

9. It is further clear from the record that photo copy of some of the office order of the colliery concerned have been filed which has beeil niarked Exts , on behalf of the workman. Ext . - I is the office order DC/HC/00 /84/382 dated 30-3-84 issued by the management . It is clearly stated that to cope with the increase of collection of store material from D.C. Stores and other Project Worksliop Sri S. D. Gupta has been deputed and doing ( his job since last several months. He is liereby coufiriied and posted to work inthe Store as additional Store Keeper and will work under guidance from Engineer ( Exevn. ) . Ext. II is the 2nd office order No. DCPM/ 111 /03 /B - 10/ 94/260 dated 21-1-94 issued by the Dy . Chief Personnel Manager , CV Area mentioning that on the basis of the authorisation vide office order No. DC/HC/ 00 / 84 /382 dated 30-3-84, Sri S. D. Gupta is re -designated as Store Keeper, Gr . 1 with effect from 30-3-84 but without any financial benefit : Thils issues with the approval of G.M. Ext . Ill is office order No. DCPM: XII : 03: B- 10 : 94: 1854 dated 12-8-94 througli which the previous office order No. DCPM : XII : 03 : B -10 :94: 260 dated 2-2-94 was cancelled and Sri S.D. Gupta has been re -designated as Store Keeper Gr. I willt effect from 4-12-90 vide office order No. PM/X11/03/B - 10/90/4134 dated 4-12-90 .

10. On the other hand a photo copy of the implementation instruction No. 34 dated 17-7-84 (Cadre Scheme) has been filed and Sunil Kumar Sinha , Clerk of Damagoria Colliery , B.C.C.L. has been exatnined as oral witness on behalf of the management in support of its case.

11. Now let us see as to how for the delinquent workman is entitled to get the wages and seitiority of StoreKeeper grade - l with effect from 30-8-84 ?

14. On the other hand the management has taken tite plea that there is no designation as additional Store Keeper In the cadre scheme of the company and the Manager committed technical mistake by meaning the word additional as assistant which was rectified subsequently by the management through its office order (Ext . III ) in support ofthe aforesaid pleading the management has filed the photo copy of the cadre scheme and referred the ihiplementation instruction No. 34 dated 17-7-84 of the cadre scheme. Accordingly to which a person can be promoted in clerical Gr.- 1 only ifhe is a matriculate and has five years experience as Asstt . Store Keeper in clerical Gr . - 11.

15. Let us see as to how for the present dispute cottes under the purview of the said cadre scheme.

16. It is clear from the very opening line of the cadre scheme that the implementation instruction No. 34 was formulated on 17-7-84 and accordingly the above cadre scheme were forwarded to the management with a request to take necessary steps to implement tlie same . It is also provided in savings clause that all the executive instruction and others hitherto issued on the subject shall be deemed tohave been repealed simultaneously with the coming into force of this scheme .

12. From perusal of the office order No. DC /HC/ 00 / 84/382 dated 30-3-84 (Ext . I ) issued by the Manager of the colliery it transpires that Sri S. D. Gupta had been deputed and doing the work of Store Clerk since last several months to cope with the increase in work of collection of Store material from D.C. Stores and other Project Workshop and subsequently he has confirmed and posted to work in the Store as additional Store Keeper . It is further clear from the letter itself that this letter was issued as per the discussion with the Union and the Management . From the spirit and contents of the said office order the contention of the Union finds support that there was an agreement between the Union and the Management , after considering the facts

3422 G1/04-46 8988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[ PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 29th October, 2004

S.O. 3055. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govcrument hereby publishes the award Ref. CGIT- 12/2003 of the Cent . Govt . Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court . Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of O/ o The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner . and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-10-2004.

[No. L-42012/139/2001 - IR ( CM - II) | N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT JAIPUR

Case No. CGIT - 12/ 2003

Reference No. L-42012/ 139/ 2001 - IR( CM - II)

Sh . Manoj Kumar Raiger, S/ o Sh . Ram Chandra Raiger, R/ o PostChavdia , Tehsil - Jamva Ramgarh , Distt. Jaipur

Applicant

Versus

H 17. On perusal of the office order Ext . I it transpires that the same was issued on 30-3-84 by the management through which Sri S.D. Gupta was confirmed and was posted to work in the Store as additional Store- keeper. This office order was issued much before coming into force of the said implementation instruction of the cadre scheme and that scheme was even not then in existence and that is why the then Dy. Chief Personnel Manager , CV Area with the approval of G.M. had issued its office order vide its letter No. DCPM/XII/ 03/B - 10/ 94/260 dated 1-2-94 through which Sri S.D. Gupta was re - designated as Store- keeper Gr. I with effect from 30-3-84 . The cadre scheme no where provides its implementation with the retrospective effect rather it has got it prospective effect . So issuance of the cancellation of office order No. DCPM/XII/03/B- 10/94/260 dated 1-2-94 by the management to give the retrospective effect of the said cadre scheme is absolutely wrong and bascless . As such the implementation instruction No. 34 dated 17-7-84 of the cadre scheme is not at all applicable in this case and the management can not take the benefit or advantage of this cadre scheme . Besides this the plea taken by the management that Sri Gupta was authorised to work as Additional Store - keeper which emmplies assistant to the Store-keeper from 30-3-84 itself falls flat that from the very statement of the witness Sri Sunil Kumar Sinha , Clerk of Damagoria Colliery examined on behalf of the management . Hehas categorically stated during his cross - exam. that the posts of Additional Store - keeper and the Store-kecper are equal . From no any stretch of imagination it can be said that the word additional means an Assistant which has been misunderstood by the management .

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Nidhi Bhawan , Vidyut Marg. Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.

2. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Administration ) , Nidhi Bhawan. Vidyut Marg . Jyoti Nagar. Jaipur .

Non-applicants

Present:

Presiding Officer

: Sh . R. C. Sharma

Forthe Applicant

: Sh . Sitaram Sharma 18. Having gone through the entire facts . circumstances, evidence and the arguments advanced by the side of both the parties I am satisfied to hold that the action of the management of Damagoria Colliery under the B.C.C.L. in denying to give effect of seniority of Sri S.D. Gupta. Store-keeper Gr. I w.e.f. 30-3-84 is not at all legal and justified and the delinquent workman is entitled to get wages and seniority of Store -keeper, Gr. I w.e.f. 30-3-84. Let the award be and the same is passed accordingly . The Secretary is directed to send the copy of the award to the Ministry of Labour for information and needful.

For the non - applicants : Sh . Vimal Kumar Jain MD. SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer

Dateof award

: 15-10-2004

नई दिल्ली, 29 अक्तूबर, 2004

AWARD

1. The Central Govemment in exercise of the powers confcrred under Clanse ' D' of Sub- sections 1 & 2 (A ) to Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( hereinafter referredto as the Act") has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under:-

का.आ. 3055.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, रिजनल प्रोविडेन्ट फन्ड कमिशन प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जयपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी. 12/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल.- 42012/139/2001- आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner. Jaipur in terminating the services of workman Shri Manoj Kumar Raiger भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रह्मयण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

S/o Ram Chandra Raiger w.e.f. 1-4-1992 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"

2. Pursuant to the reference , the workman has submitted his statement of claim wherein he has pleaded that after inviting his name from the employnient exchange he was appointed as 4th Class employee as per rules on 23-4-91 by the non - applicant establishunent , who continuously worked up to 31-3-92 . But his service was terminated on 1-4-92 without giving him one month's notice or pay in lieu of the notice and retrenchment compensation . He has further stated that the junior 4th Class employee Sh . Rup Lal Dangi was retained at the time of terminating his service in violation of Section 25 -G of the Act and after his termination , the new appointments of the 4th Class , as named at para 4 - C of the claim statement, were made by the management in violation of Section 25 - H of the Act . He has categorically stated that he was employed against the permanent vacant post of the 4th Class . He has prayed to reinstate him with continuity of service and back - wages .

3. Resisting the claim of the workman , the non- applicants in their counter statement have averred that the workman was employed for a short period to fill the water in the coolers and the drinking water in the pitchers as a daily wager . They have denied that he was ever appointed as a 4th Class employee and have further denied that he continuously worked up to 31-3-92 . They have categorically pointed out that the workman has worked during the spell w.e.f. April , 1991 to February , 1992 for certain days in each month and had thus completed only 190 days in the calendar year. At para 2 of the counter statement, they have narrated the number of the working days in each month which comes to 190 days in total. They have denied that there is any permanent post of waterman in the establishment ..

4. In the rejoinder, the workman has reiterated the facts as stated in the statement of claim.

5. On the pleadings ofboth the parties, the following points fordetermination were framed:-

BOA Whether the workman was appointed by the non-applicant as 4th Class employee on 23-4-91 as per rules who continuously worked up to 31-3-92 and has thus completed more than 240 days in a calendar year ?

BOA IL Whether the service of the workman was terminated in violation of provision under Section 25 -F of the Act ?

BOA III Whether at the time of terminating the service of the workman , the junior employee to him , viz . , Sh. Roop Lal Dangi was retained by the management in violation of Section 25 -G of the Act ?

8989 IV. Whether after the termination of the workman , the non - applicant management has recruited Sh . Nathuram Balothiya , Sh. Sitaram Dhanika , Sh. Chetan Prakash Sen and Sh. Ramchandra Meena without affording him an opportunity of employment to the workman in violation of Section 25 -H of the Act ? BOA V Relief, if any.

6. In the evidence , the workman has submitted his affidavit, who was cross - examined on behalf of the non- applicants . On behalf of the non - applicants , the affidavit ofMW- 1 , Sh . R. S. Sisodiya, Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, has been brought on the record, who was cross-examined on behalf of the workman .

7. The workman has chosen not to lead any documentary evidence, whereas the non- applicants have brought on the record as many as 3 documents.

8. I have heard both the parties and have scanned the record . The point-wise discussion follows as under :- Point No. I& II

9. For the sake of convenience , both these points are discussed together .

10. The ld. representative for the workman contends thatthe workman's name was called for by the non -applicant establishment from the employment exchange who was appointed on 23-4-91 as a 4th Class employee and who continuously worked up to 31-3-92. His next contention is that he was a full- time employee who had completed over 240 days in a calendar year .

11. Arguing contra , the ld . representative for the non- applicant management submits that the workman's name was invited by the management from the employment exchange for his employment as a waterman on daily wages basis and he had completed only 190 days of work with the management . His next submission is that he was not a full- timeemployee.

12. Now, the first question which crops up for consideration is as to whether the workman was employed bythe non -applicant management as a 4th Class employee as per rules ?

13. It is not disputed that the name of the workinan was sponsored by the employment exchange on the request made by the management . The management has produced the letter of request Ex. NA - 1 which was addressed on behalf of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Rajasthan, Jaipur to the employment exchange whereby the applications for the daily wages employees (waterboys ) were invited. Ex. NA- 2 is the letter written by the Employment Exchange Officer which suggests that in pursuance of the aforesaid letter, a list containing the 41 names of the candidates were sent for consideration of employment as waterboy.

8990

THEGAZETTEOF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

evident from the discussion under points unmber I & II that the workman was employed as a waterman on daily wages basis , but Rup Lal Dangi was appointed by the management as a regular peon, who obviously belongs to a distinct category of the employees other that the daily rated workman. His appointed and continuation in the service at the time of termination of the workman is not attracted within the ambit of Section 25 -G of the Act . As such, this point is also decided against the workman.

PointNo. IV

14. In the cross -examination , the workman has admitted that he used to fill the water in the coolers and drinking water in the water pots . Further, he has also stated that he used to perform the duties of a 4th Class , which appears to be his improved deposition , because he has earlier in his statement has admitted that his name was invited from the employment exchange along with other employees for the purpose of employing them as waterboys. It is thus obvious on the basis of the documents Ex. NA - 1 and NA - 2 that the workman was employed as a waterman on daily wages .

15. Then I turn to the next submission made on behalf of the workman as to whether he had completed 240 days of work in a calendar year preceding to the date of termination.

18. The workman's case is that after terminating him from the service, Sh. Nathuram Balothiya, Sh. Sitaram Dhanika , Sh . Chetan Prakash Sen and Sh . Ramchandra Meena were subsequently appointed by the management without affording him any opportunity of employment in violation of Section 25 -H of the Act.

19. When this question was put to the management witness Sh. R. S. Sisodiya , he has pleaded ignorance to such appointments made after 1992 by the management and has deposed that only after looking the official record, which was not available with him at the time of his deposition, he could be able to correctly point out this fact. However, the onus lies upon the workman to prove that after his termination such appointments were made , which he has failed to establish . Moreover , from the aforesaid observation , it is clear that the workman was employed as a waterman and if any subsequent appointment was made by the management to the post of a regular 4th Class, that pertains to a distinct category and on the basis thereof it cannot be presumed that the management has violated the provision contained under Section 25 -H of the Act. Accordingly , this point is also decided against the workman.

20.The ld. representative for the workman has invited my attention towards JT 1996 (7) SC 181 and 1991 (2) RLR 158, but there facts are not similar to the present controversy and the workman does not derive any assistance from them.

PointNo. V

21. For the aforesaid reasons , the claim of the workman deserves to be rejected and he is not entitled for any relief.

16. In the evidence , the workman has stated that from 23-4-91 to 31-3-92 , he had continuously worked and has completed 240 days of work . As against it, the specific stand of the non - applicant management is that the workman was employed from May , 1991 to February, 1992 , who had completed only 190 days . The number of the working days in each month of this spell has been detailed in the counter statement as well as in the affidavit of Sh . R. S. Sisodiya. To substantiate this stand , the non - applicants have also submitted on record the payment vouchers Ex . NA - 3 on the basis thereof they have succeeded to establish their stand . Moreover, the ld . representative for the workman has also admitted that on the basis of payment vouchers , the number of actual working days comes to 190, which when calculated with 32 holidays falling in this duration amount to 222 days in toto. As such, from this angle also , the workman has not completed 240 days in the calendar year preceding to his termination . Thus , the workman in support of his submission that he had completed 240 days in the calendar year preceding to the date of termination could not be able to produce any cogent evidence . Accordingly. it is held that the workman has failed to prove that he was employed as a 4th Class employee who had completed 240 days of work during the calendar year preceding to his termination. The Id. representative for workman in support of the submission has referred to the decision 1997 ( 1 ) WLC (Raj . ) 422 , the facts thereof are entirelydifferent from the present case and hence it does not help the workman. Accordingly, points number I and II are decided against the workman .

Point No. III

22. Consequently, the reference is answered in the negative against the workman and the claim of the workman is rejected. It is held that the action of the non - applicant management in terminating the service of the workman w.e.f. 1-4-92 is legal andjustified. An award is passed in these terms accordingly .

23. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17 ( 1 ) of the Act .

17. It is the case of the workman that at the time ofhis termination , his junior employee Sh. Rup Lal Dangi was retained by the management . MW - 1 , Sh . R. S. Sisodiya in his cross - examination has deposed that Rup Lal Dangi was appointed as a regular peon after the month of April , 1991 . Although it is true that Rup Lal Dangi was appointed subsequent to the employment of the workman , yet as is

R. C. SHARMA, Presiding Officer 8991 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रह्मषण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 अक्तूबर, 2004

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under:-

"Whether the action of the management of Telecommunication Department in terminating the services of workman Sh . Mahesh Chand w.e.f. 13-10-98 was legal and justified ? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled and from what date ?" का. आ. 3056.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी. 21/ 2002) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-10-2004 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 40012/78/2002- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 29th October, 2004

S.O. 3056. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. CGIT - 21 / 2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Deptt. of Telecom and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29-10-2004.

[No. L-40012/78/2002- IR (DU)]

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

Case No. CGIT - 21 /2002 Reference No. L-40012/ 78 /2002- IR(DU)

Sh. Mahesh Chand ,

S/o Sh. Hazari Lal Harijan ,

R/o Kherliganj , Tehsil Kathumar ,

.......Applicant

Alwar (Rajasthan)

Versus

1. The General Manager,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Alwar

2. The District Engineer,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Alwar

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,

2. Pursuantto the reference , the workman has filed his statement of claim wherein he has pleaded that he was appointed to the post of Safai Karamchari on 15-8-87 by the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Alwar (for short, Nigam) and wasposted atKherli Telephone Exchange, Kherliganj , Alwar , where he had worked for more than the prescribed hours of duty which were 8 hours a day, since he was the only safaiwala posted there . He has further stated that when he requested the non - applicant no. 3 to increase his salary , he learnt that the sweeping work was proposed to be assigned on contract basis in order to deprive him from his legitimate right .He has further averred that the Central Government of Indiaunder Section 10 ofthe Contract and Regulation and Abolition Act , 1970 issued a notification prohibiting contract of sweeping work of the premises belonging to the Government of India . He has then stated that he filed a suit before the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) , Khatyar , Distt. Alwar against his proposed termination , but during the pendency thereof his service was terminated w.e.f. 13-10-98 and on his application , the Id. Court granted him the permission to withdraw the suit with a liberty to challenge his termination before the Central Administrative Tribunal . Thereafter he filed an application before the CAT and in view ofthe Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision that telephone department was an industry within Section 2- S of the Act , he moved an application before the CATseeking permission towithdraw his case with liberty to approach the competent court. The workman has challenged his termination on the grounds that he had completed more than 240 days of continuous service with the department in every calendar year and that his service was terminated in violation of Section 25 -F of the Act. His other grounds of challenge are that his juniors were retained by the Nigam in violation of Section 25 -G and the fresh hands were appointed after his termination in violation of Section 25 -H of the Act . He has prayed for his reinstatement in service with its continuity and other consequential benefits .

..Non -Applicant

Alwar

PRESENT:

Sh. R.C. Sharma

Presiding Officer :

Sh .Neeraj Bhatt .

Forthe applicant:

Sh . T.P. Sharma

For the non -applicant :

24-9-2004

Date of award:

AWARD

3. The non-applicants resisting the claim have stated in their counter statement that in pursuance of the tender dated 30-9-98, the Nigam has engaged Smt. Krishna Devi , the mother of the claimant as Safaiwala on contract basis who is a necessary party in the present case . It has then been stated that the claimant had filed an application challenging his termination order after the expiry of two years before the CAT and on the ground ofthe delay, the claim is liable to be dismissed and that the suit filed on behalf of the workman before the 1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause ' D ' of Sub-section 1 & 2 ( A) of 8992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

BONA

in the present case ?

VI. Whether the claim is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay in filing the claim ? BONA

VIL Whether the present case is not coveredunder the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ?

BONA

VIII. Relief, in any.

6. In the evidence , the workman has submitted his affidavit . In the defence, the counter- affidavit of MW- 1 , Sh . K. R. Verma , SDO, Telephone Exchange , Kherli and MW- 2 , Sh . L. S. Meena , Telephone Technician, Kherli have been brought on the record . Both the parties have also led the documentary evidence.

7. I have heard both the parties and have gone through the record . Point- wise discussion follows as under:-

Points No. I, VI & VII

Civil Court was also dismissed on 28-4-2000. Clarifying their stand the non -applicants have pleaded that the claimant was engaged as a part -time safaiwala purely on contract basis for sweeping the premises, who had to work-3-4 hours per day, for which no written order was issued to the claimant and he was paid out of the contingent fund. It has also been stated that he was appointed against any regular post nor such post of safaiwala exists in the sanctioned strength of the Nigam. The non -applicants have further stated that on account of shifting ofthe telephone exchange building to the new increased area, the tender was invited for the said purpose and it was finalized in favour of Smt . Krishna Devi for which the claimant had agreed. The non - applicants have added that the claim is not coveredby the provisions under the Act as the claimant was engaged as a part - time safaiwala on daily wages basis , that the claimant had never been an employee ofthe Nigam, that he had not completed 240 days in one calendar year and that the provision under Section 2(oo ) (bb) is attracted in the present case. The non - applicants have denied any violation on their part of the provisions under 25 -F, 25 -G and 25 -H of the Act respectively.

7. All these points involve the identical facts . Hence they are discussed together as under.

4. The workman in his rejoinder has sought to counter the facts as stated in the written statement by stating that Smt . Krishna Devi is not a necessary party in the matter as he has sought no relief against her , that the posts Sweepers on regular basis exist in the Nigam in the form of Divisional Railway Manager (Railway Regular Mazdoor ) as per the service rules and that the CAT has accorded a liberty in favour of the workman to avail the appropriate remedy from the competent forum . It has been denied by the workman that he was employed on the contractual basis and that he had accorded his consent to the appointment of Smt. Krishna Devi .

5. On the pleadings of both the parties, the following points for determination were framed:-

L. Whether the applicant was appointed on the post of Safai Karamchari on 15-8-87by the non -applicant management, who has completed more than 240 days continuous service with the Department in the every calendar year ? BOA

8. The Id. representative for the workman contends that the workman was appointed as a Sweeper on 15-8-87 by the Nigam and the management has not specifically denied this fact . His further submission is that after a continuous service of 11 years , on 13-10-98 , the service of the workman was terminated and in the above period he continuously worked . The case of the workman , therefore, falls under 25 - B ( 1 ) of the Act and the Id. representative has pleaded that in the alternative the workman has completed 240 days in every calendar year . The Id . representative has placed his reliance on the certificates Ex. W- 7 and W - 11 issued by the management and has argued that on the basis of these two certificates it is proved that the workman had continuously worked from 1987 to the year 1996. The next contention advanced on behalf of the workman is that the oral evidence adduced on behalf of the workman is also trustworthy and he could not be cross -examined on the question of continuity of the service and that this fact could notbe denied by the non- applicants in their evidence .

IL. Whether in view of the notification issued by the Central Government under Section 10 of the Contract Labour and Regulation and Abolition Act, 1970, the non - applicants were otherwise restricted to get the cleaning work performed through a contractor ?

BOA

III. Whether on terminating the service of the workman on 13-10-98 , his juniors were retained and were subsequently absorbed in regular service ?

BOA

IV. Whether fresh hands were appointed after the termination of the workman ? BOA

9. Per contra, the Id. representative for the non- applicants submits that the workman was not appointedby the Nigam, that no letter of appointment was issued to him, but he was engaged to discharge the work of sweeping and cleaning in the Nigam premises and that he has not completed 240 days of continuous employment. He has emphatically stated that it was simply an engagement and not an appointment by the Nigam. His next contention is that the workman was employed for a specified period . Therefore , the case of the workman is covered by the provision under Section 2 (oo ) (bb ) and on account of non - renewal of the contract period, his engagement automatically came to an end. As such , it does not amountto the retrenchment . The Id. representative has further contended that on account of V. Whether Smt . Krishna Devi , who has been engaged on the post of Safaiwala is a necessary party [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

thedelay in raising the dispute, the claim of the workman is also not maintainable and his suit on the subject was dismissed by the Civil Court and his application was also rejected by the CAT. The efficacious remedy was not availed by the workman himself.

10. I have bestowed my thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions and have gone through thejudicial pronouncements referred to before me .

11. Now , the question which crops up for determination is as to whether the workman has completed 240 days of employment in the calendar year preceding to his termination under the Nigam and whether his service was retrenched ?

12. To substantiate his case , the workman has submitted his affidavit along with the documentary evidence . In his oral evidence, the worknian has stated that on 15-8-87 , he was appointed by the Nigam to the post of the Safaiwala who had continuously worked up to 13-10-98 as a full -time employee . On this point, the workman was cross -examined who has categorically stated thathe was employed to discharge the duty for 8 hours per day, that he was appointed on 15-8-87 and that there were two buildings pertaining to the Nigam , the cleaning thereof was discharged by him alone . He has further emphatically stated that he had continuously worked for 10 to 11 years .

13. In support of his oral evidence , the workman has brought on the record the documentary evidence, viz . , Ex. W - 5 , W - 7 , W-9 , W- 10 and W - 11 to establish that he was employed by the Nigam who had continuously worked fora period of 10 to 11 years .

14. Ex . W - 5 is a letter dated 21-5-92 addressed by the Telecom District Engineer, Alwar to the SDO for the increase of the wages in the case of the workman and wherein it has been mentioned that Sh . Mahesh Chand working as Sweeper in telephone exchange , Kherli has approached to the office for the increase of his wages as he has been working there for the last 5 to 6 years and he is having wages at Rs. 8/ - per day since long . Ex . W - 7 is a certificate dated 6-9-93 issued by the officer in -charge, telephone exchange, Kherli in favour ofthe working stating therein that Sh. Mahesh Chand Sweeper is working in the telephone exchange , Kherli for the last about 5-6 years as a Safaiwala on daily wages basis . Similarly, another certificate Ex . W - 11 has been issued by the Jr. Telephone Exchange Officer, Kherli , dated nil, which says that as per the office record Sh . Mahesh Chand is working as a Sweeper since 1990 and whose work is found satisfactory.

15. Ex. W- 9 is an application dated 23-12-96 presented by the workman before the District Engineer , Telephone Exchange , Alwar wherein he has requested that for the last 10 years he is working as a Safaiwala in the department who is working for 5 hours a day and he may be regularized as a regular Safaiwala . This letter was transmitted to the TDM, Alwar, by the SDO Kherli along

8993

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

with the forwarding letter Ex . W - 10 . Thus , from the certificates Ex. W-7 , W - 11 and the application ofthe workman Ex. W- 9 , it is clearly established that the workman was continuously working w.e.f. 1987. Thus , on the documentary evidence which pertains to the Nigam, this fact cannot be denied that the workman was sweeping and cleaning the premises of the Nigam as a daily wager continuously from the year 1987 to the end of the year 1996 .

16. On behalf of the Nigam, Oral evidence of MW - 1 , Sh. K. R. Verma, the SDO, Telephone Exchange , Kherli and MW- 2 , Sh . L.S. Meena, the Telephone Technician, Kherli hasbeen brought on the record. K.R. Verma's evidence is that the workman was employed for a specific period who used to work for 2-3 hours as a daily wager and that there is no sanctioned post of Safaiwala in the Nigam. Firstly, in his evidence Sh. K.R. Verma has not disclosed the specific period ofemployment of the workman , and secondly , no written agreement could be adduced on behalf of the Nigam in support of its evidence . This witness has admitted in his cross - examination that the workman was engaged on contractual basis , but it was not in writing, rather it was an oral agreement. He has too admitted that since July, 1987 he was engaged on contractual basis. Although he has deposed in his cross -examination that he was not continuously working and in his place the other labourers were employed, but no such plea has been incorporated in the written statement of the non-applicants. He has admitted in the cross - examination that the part -time wagers were paid the wages throughpayment form ACG - 17 and has further admitted that the workman was paid the wages through this form from 1987 to 1998. Thus , as per the oral evidence of the management, the workman had continuously worked upto 1998 .

17. MW - 2 , Slı . L.S. Meena has denied in his affidavit that the workman had ever completed 240 days of employment in a calendar year with the Nigam. But in his cross - examination he has admitted that the workman was even discharging his duty prior to 15-8-87 . His testimony is that the workman was employed on the oral contractual basis , but the date of specified period he could not be able to disclose in his cross - examination .

18. On the scrutiny of the oral evidence adduced on behalf of both the parties this fact is further proved that the workman had continuously worked from 15-8-87 to 13-10-98 . It was contended on behalf of the Nigam that the workman was employed on contractual basis as a dailywager whose case is attracted by the provision under Section2 ( oo ) (bb) and on account of the non- renewal of the contract , his engagement automatically came to an end. Thus , it has been argued by the Id . representative , the case is not covered by the definition of the retrenchment. But it is evident from the foregoing analysis of the evidence , documentary as well as oral , that no documentary evidence regarding the execution of the agreement between the Nigam and the workman could be brought on the record and the oral evidence adduced on 8994

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

behalf of the Nigam is feeble and untrustworthy . Therefore, the contention advanced on behalf of the Nigam on this point is unsustainable and is rejected accordingly.

this contingency is provided in Clause 2 of Section 25 -B of the Act and if a person is working continuously for several years , his services are to be governed by the provisions contained in Clause 1 of Section 25 -B of the Act.

24. The contention canvassed on behalf of the workman is thus fortified by the decisions supra and on account of the continuously working with the Nigam from the year 1987 to the year 1998 , the workman attracts the protection under Section 25 -B( 1 ) read with Section 25 - F of the Act. His termination in violation of Section 25 - F of the Act thus clearly amounts to the retrenchment .

19. It has then been argued on behalf of the Nigam that no such post of Safaiwala exist in the cadre of the Nigam. But MW - 1 , K.R. Verma in his cross - examination has admitted that P &T manual is also applicable to the BSNL employees and under chapter 14 of the manual , relevant rules governing the 4th Class employees are incorporated wherein under sub -rule 2 to Rule 516 the post ofFarash is mentioned . He has even pleaded ignorance whether the Farash is known as Safaiwala. Thus, it is evident from his evidence that the post of Farash/ Safaiwala does exist under the relevant rules of the Nigam and the submission made on behalf of the Nigam is negatived accordingly .

20. The Id. representative for the workman in support ofhis contentions , he has placed his reliance uptoAIR 2002 SC 508 ; 1996 ( 1 ) LLN Rajasthan 941 and has also placed acopy ofthe unreportable judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the matter of SB Civil Writ Petition No. 2813/1996 (Union of Indiav . Laxmi Narayan).

25. It has also been argued on behalf of the Nigam that on account of the raising the dispute belatedly, the claim of the workman does not deserve to be allowed and his suit for reinstatement as well as his application filed before the CAT were dismissed. Countering this submission , the Id. representative for the workman contends that the workman has instituted a suit before the Civil Court for his reinstatment which was withdrawn by him. Then he filed anapplication before the CAT, which was also withdrawn and thereafter he raised an industrial dispute . The Id. representative has contended that on merits , the case of the workman was not rejected by the competent . forum earlier and he has explained the delay. In support of his contention, the Id. representative has drawn my attention towards the decision reported in 2003 CDR (SC) 514.

21. In AIR 2002 SC 508 , the facts are that neither the workman produced any material in support of his case nor to rebut his claim any material was produced by the employer. Under these circumstances , the Labour Court came to the conclusion that on appreciation of the material on. record such as appointment letter and the termination order of the workman , he had worked with the employer for 240 days in a year . On these facts , the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that the view taken by the Labour Court is in order.

26. It appears from the record that the workman had instituted a suit before the Court of Civil Judge, Jr. Division, Khatumar, Distt. Alwar wherein he had filed an application Ex. W-1 on 15-3-2001 that he is willing to file his case before the Labour Court, therefore, his case may be closed. Accordingly , by the order Ex. W-4 dated 29-4-2000, his application was accepted and the proceeding of the suit was closed by the Court . It appears that thereafter the workman had filed an application for getting the said reliefbefore the CAT Bench at Jaipur and by the order of the Bench dated 15-3-2001 (Ex. W- 1) , his application was dismissed as withdrawn for presentation before the Competent Authority under the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Thus , the workman has endeavored to show that during the period of said delay he had instituted the suit/ application before the lawful authorities and subsequently in the lack ofjurisdiction he had withdrawn them to present them before the competent forum.

27. In 2003 CDR ( SC ) 514 , referred to on behalf of the workman , the facts are that it was argued on behalf of the employer that on account of the delay in raising the dispute by the workmen, the Hon'ble High Court was justified in denying the relief. to the workmen. It was disagreed by the Hon'ble Apex Court and the Hon'ble Court has expresseed its views as under :-

22. In 1996 (1) LLN Rajasthan 941 , the question which arose for consideration before the Hon'ble Court was whether it was necessary for the workmen who has worked for 240 days every year except the last calendar year of his service and whether the termination of the workmen stands vitiated for non- compliance of Section 25-F read with Section 25 -B of the Act . The Labour Court had recorded a finding that the workmen were in continuous service front the year 1978 to 1985 , as such their case fell under Clause ( 1 ) of 25 - B and they are entitled to be dealt with under the provisions of the Section 25 - F of the Act . It was also held by the Labour Court that on this count the fact that the workmen did not actually work for 240 days in the last calendar year of their service , would not make any difference for attracting the provision under Section 25 -F . The Hon'ble Court has held that in view of these facts , the Labour Court rightly held that there was non- compliance of Section 25 of the Act by the management and that the retrenchment of the workmen was illegal and void.

"The delaywould certainly be fatal if it has resulted in material evidence relevant to the adjudication being lost and rendered not available. However , we do not think that the delay in the case at hand has been so culpable as to disentitled the appellants to any relief. Although theHigh Court has opined that there was a delay of 7 to 9 years in raising the dispute before the Tribunal but we find the High Court factually not 23. On similar facts , in the unreportable judgment in the matter of Union of India v. Laxmi Narayan , the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has followed its decision delivered in 1996 (1 ) WLN 941 wherein it has been categorically held that if a person is working continuously for the last several years then the requirement of working for 240 days in a calendar year preceding the date of retrenchment is not applicable . The Hon'ble Court has further observed that as 8995 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

not appointed any regular employee in his place . Thus, his testimony on this point is vague and indefinite , he has not disclosed the name of any employee who was recruited by the management subsequent to his termination and has admitted this fact in his cross - examination also .

35. Apart it , he has admitted in his cross- examination that the work of cleaning and sweeping is discharged by his wife presently. On behalf of the management , a letter Ex. M - 1 dated 17-8-99 granting the tender of sweeping in favour of Smt. Krishni Devi , who has beentold to be the mother of the workman, has been issued. This tender was granted for a period of one year. correct. The employment of the appellants was terminated sometime in 1985-86 or 1986-87 . Pursuant to the judgment in Daily Rated Casual Labourvs. Union of India, (Supra) the Department was formulating a scheme to accommodate casual labourers and the appellants were justified in awaiting theoutcome thereof. On 16-1-1990 they were refused to be accommodated in the Scheme. On 28-12-1990 they initiated the proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act followed by conciliation proceedings and then the dispute was referred to the Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court. "

28. In the light of the aforequoted decisions , the submission made on behalf of the workman is strengthened and it is held that the delay in raising the dispute in the matter is not fatal under the facts and circumstances available on the record.

29. On the basis of aforesaid analysis of evidence , Point No. 1 is decided in favour of the workman and points no. VI & VII are decided against the non -applicants.

Point No. II

36. On 19-11-2003, the workman was cross -examined on behalf of the Nigam who has admitted the fact of performing the work of sweeping by his wife presently . Thus, on the basis of this evidence, it appears that no regular employee was recruited by the management after his termination and for a short period the work of sweeping was assigned to the mother of the workman on contract basis , which is presently being discharged by his wife. Thus , the workman has failed to prove the burden of this pointthat the fresh hands have been recruited by the Nigam after his termination and accordingly, the point No. IV is decided against him.

37. It does not appear on the basis of the aforesaid discussion that Smt . Krishni Devi is a necessary party in the present dispute. In the terms of the reference , she has also not been impleaded as a party . Thus , point no . V is decided against the non - applicants .

30. The Id . representative for the workman during the course of the arguments could not be able to draw my attention towards any notification issued by the Central Government under Section 10 of the Contract Labour Regulation and Abolition Act , 1970 and was unable to argue on this point . No such notification could be brought on the recordby the workman. Accordingly , this point is decided against the workman.

Relief

Points No. III

38. On account ofthe decision of point no . I in favour ofthe workman , his claim deserves to be allowed.

31. The onus of proving this point lies upon the workman. The Id . representative for the workman does not press this point. Accordingly, it is decided against the workman.

Points No. IV & V

32. Both these points require a combined discussion and determination accordingly.

39. The Id . representative for the workman has submitted that the workman is entitled for the full back- wages and has relied upon the decision cited in AIR 1979 SC 75 whereas on behalf of the Nigam this submission is sought to be controverted by arguing that on account of the delay in raising the dispute. the workman is not entitled to get the back wages .

33. The submission made on behalf of the workman is that after terminating the service of the workman, one Smt. Krishna Devi was appointed in his place without offering the opportunity of employment to the workman . On the other hand, the Id . representative for the Nigam contends that Smt . Krishna Devi @ Krishni Devi is none else except the mother of the workman who was employed after inviting the tender with the consent of the workman.

40. I have given my thoughtful consideration to this contention also and I have gone through the facts of the decision cited in AIR 1979 SC 75 , which are dissimilar to the present controversy . But the facts of the decision cited in 2003 CDR ( SC ) 576 , referred to by the ld. representative for the workman, are squarely applicable to the case at hand and following the guidelines set out by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this decision , it is held that on facts the workman is not entitled for the back -wages .

41. For the foregoing reasons, the reference is answered in the affirmative in favour of the workman and his claim is allowed. It is held that the termination of the service ofworkman w.e.f. 13-10-98 is illegal and unjustified and he is entitled to be reinstated in the service with its continuity but without back - wages . An award is passed in these terms accordingly .

42. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government forpublication under Section 17 ( 1) of the Act .

R.C. SHARMA , Presiding Officer 34. In his statement of claim the workman has not disclosed the names of the persons who were appointed subsequent to his termination and has simply stated that "fresh hands were appointed but neither the applicant was informed about the same nor any opportunity was given tothe applicant for the same" . On these facts, the workman has challenged the violation of the provision under Section 25-H of the Act. In his affidavit he is silent on this point andhas not disclosed the name of any employee who was appointed by the Nigam after his termination , but has simply stated that the fresh hands have been recruited to the post of the Safaiwala after his termination . In his cross- examination, he has clearly admitted that the Nigam has

3422 GI/04-47 8996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 1 नवम्बर, 2004

party / employer had terminated the services of the applicant in arbitrary manner on 1-11-90. That prior to terminating the services of the applicant the employer neither gave any notice or pay in lieu of notice or any compensation to the applicant .

का.आ. 3057.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार रीजनल सेरीकल्चरल रिसर्च स्टेशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.- II नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 95/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 1-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/182/93- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 1st November , 2004

That the applicant had worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year and in the year of 1990, the applicant hadworked 264 days continuously. That the applicant had worked with full devotion and entire satisfaction of the employer. That after terminating the services of the applicant the employer has appointed some juniors to the applicant in place of the applicant and also regularised them, which is also discriminatory .

S.O. 3057. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 95/94) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No.II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Regional Sericultural Research Station and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 1-11-2004.

[No. L-42012/ 182/93 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

That the employer has contravened the provisions of section 25F of the Industrial Dispute Act, well the settled provisions ofretrenchment . The termination of the applicant is totally illegal , arbitrary and void ab - intio . That after termination by the employer the applicant had made a number of representations but all in vain . That the termination ofthe applicant is punitive in nature and totally in utter disregard of the settled principles of retrenchment as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court . That the termination of the applicant dated 1-11-90 is illegal and liable to be set aside and the applicant is entitled to be reinstated with continuity of services with full back wages and other benefits .

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT NO . II, NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL

1. D. NO . 95/94

IN THE MATTER OF :

Sh . Sunil Kumar S/o Sh . Devi Chand Sharma, R/o Village and P.O. Sewla , Dehradun

VERSUS

JointDirector , Regional Sericultural Research Station , Sellakui , Dehradun

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L-42012/ 182/ 93 IR ( DU ) Central Government Dt. 17-8-1994 has referred

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement, it has been admitted that the workman in question Sh. Sunil Kumar Sharma , S /o Sh . Devi Chand Sharma, R/ o Village and Post Sevla, Dehradun was engaged as casual labourer at RSRS , Majra on contractual basis with effect from 1-7-86 purely on termporary basis for a period of two months with an automatic end of the engagement period . (The copy of the engagement order is enlosed herewith as annexure - I). That the services of Sh. Sunil Kumar after the contractual period of two months was utilized at different interval depending upon the nature of research work available in this station . After the initial contractual engagement for a period of 2 months in 1986, he was never engaged until 1989 March . No engagement orders were issued to him. Thus there is no question of termination of his services as alleged by him.

the following point for adjudication.

The Point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of Regional Sericultural Research Station in terminating the services of Sh . Sunil Kumar , S/ o Devi Chand Sharma casual labour w.e.f. 1-1-90 isjustified ? Ifnot what relief the workınan is entitled to ? "

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman applicant was appointed by the O.P. intially on 1-7-86 as casual labour and the workman applicant had worked. with the opposite party till 31-10-90 . That the opposite

The details of engagement of labourer during 1986, 1989 and 1990 till he gave up of the job of casual labour is enclosed as annexure - II . That the RSRS Central Silk Board has neither terminated the services of the labourer nor retrenched him . The labourer himself has given up thejob for better prospects and better job elsewhere . He has been issued experience certificate only on his request to find betterjob elsewhere on the strength of certificate issued from aGovernment Department ( annexures - III and IV) . Sh. Sharma thereafter is reported to have worked for MES and private bulbs factories and other errands . Thus there is no question of giving any notice or compensation since he went away from the work as he was taken purely on casual 8997 भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रह्मयण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

basis as and when required for research purpose from open market . That the details of the purely casual service rendered by the workman in question is enclosed as Annexure- IV.

There was no termination of the services of the applicant as alleged by him as stated above . He left the job onhis own in search of better job elsewhere. He was never engaged through local employment exchange. No labour engaged after hiın has been regularised as time scale labour as evident from Annexure -V.

the workman has worked for more than 240 days in two 12 calendar months . There is a circular from the Central Silk Board that those who have completed five years should be absorbed. But this circular is not applicable in the present case, in case , the Central Silk Board is foundto be an industry . So far as the first point is concerned , it is proved to the hilt that the workman applicant has completed 240 days . My attention was drawn to 2002 AIR SCW 44. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in case the workman has completed 240 days work in a calendar year , he is entitled to be reinstated. In view of this judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the workman is entitled to be reinstated as he has completed 240 days work in two 12 calendar months . It is no longer disputed that the workman has not completed 240 days so he deserves to be reinstated in case the management is an industry. The rules of the Central Silk Board will not prevail against the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the ID Act Section 25 (F ) . It has been specifically mentioned that in case the workman completes 240 days work, section - 25F of the ID Act is attracted and the he is entitled to be reinstated.

That the RSRS , Majra of CSB is a research station established to provide research and development support to the state sericulture department in the state of U.P. which looks after the development of this cottage industry for affording self employment in the rural areas ofthis backward state . The major portion of the research work in this station is seasonal where the labourers have been engaged as and when required. Therefore, the question of compliance with Section 25F was not found to be necessary as at no time the strength of casual hand engaged went beyond 15 number.

That as stated earlier there is no termination or retrenchment of the applicant as alleged by him. The said labourer never represented for his reinstatement after he had left the job on his own in 1990. It is to be mentioned that Central Silk Board during 1992-93 initiated a scheme for regularising all casual labourers with continuous services of 5 years as time scale labourers with more than 240 days each year . The management has denied most of the paras of the statement of claim.

The workman has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder , he has denied most of the paras of the written statement and has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim. Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

The second point for consideration is whether the management is an industry or not . It was submitted from the side of the management that the management is not an industry. It is a Research Station established to provide and Develop support to the Sericultural Department in the State of U.P. which looks after the development of the Cottage Industries for supporting self-employment in the rural areas ofthis backward state . The major portion of the research work in this station is Sericultural where the labourers have been engaged as and when required, as such, section 25 -F ofthe IDAct is not applicable. The workman applicant has certainly not been appointed to do any research work, the management witness has admitted that technical operations involved in such work are invariably seasonal in nature . But according to the certificate, the workman applicant has worked all the year. It was subnutted from the side of the workman that Central Silk Board carries on business of silk also. It gives loan to the cottage industries and sells silk produced by them so it is an industry and according to Annexure - V, it is also clear that a number of labourers are working under the Central Silk Board and the Central Silk Board decided in 1992 to regularise all the labourers who have completed 5 years ' service. The rules of the Central Silk Board cannot override the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . The management is carrying on consistent human activities and it is engaged in business also that is providing loan to the cottage industries and developing the cottage industries . As such , the management is an industry in view ofBangalore Water Supply.

My attention was drawn to JT - 1997 (4 ) SC 527. This judgment is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case . The Central Silk Board is not discharging govenment functions in Government of India . As such , it Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record. There are two points for decision . The first is whether the workman has worked for 240days or not and the second point is whether the management is an industry and the Industrial Disputes Act is applicable or not. It was submitted froin the side of the management that the management has given temporary appointments from 1-7-1986 as is evident from Annexure I and it is quite explicit from Annexure II , that the Joint Director, Regional Sericultural Research Station, Dehradun has issued certificate and on that certificate , there is a seal of Joint Director so this paper is absolutely admissible in evidence . In this experience certificate , the management has given the working experience of the workman applicant and according to this certificate , the workman applicant has completed 290 days in 1989 and 264 days in 1990. As such, for two years , the workman has worked for more than 240 days according to certificate ofthe management itself. The management has given certificate regarding his work of 10-09-1986 to 09-11-1986 . These papers can also prove that 8998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

is an industry, the law cited by the management is not applicable.

It was further submitted that the workman applicant himself abandoned work but the workman applicant has written letter in 1991 to the management to give him employment so it cannot be said that the workman applicant has himself left the work. At the earliest moment , he has represented his claim to the managentent . As such, there is no force in the argument that the workman applicant has himelf abandoned the work .

From the above discussions , it becomes quite clear that the respondent management is an industry and the workman applicant has completed 240 days in two 12 calendar months so Section 25 -F of the ID Act is attracted and he is entitled to be reinstated .

The workman, applicant is a mannual worker . The manual worker does some work in order to sustain his subsistence so this workman must be doing some sort of work to earn his livelihood . In the facts and circumstances of this case , 20 % back wages would be sufficient to meet the ends ofjustice .

The reference is replied thus :-

The action of the management of the Regional Sericultural Research Station in terminating the services of Sh. Sunil Kumar, S/ o Devi Chand Sharma casual labour w.e.f. 1-1-1990 is not justified . The workman applicant is entitled to be reinstated with 20% back wages w.e.f. 1-1-1990 within one month of the publication of the award. In case ofdefault, the workman applicant will be entitledto an interest of 6% per annum on the entire back wages till date.

The award is given accordingly.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3058.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 71/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ सं. एल-20012/170/94- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस . एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd November , 2004 S.O. 3058. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 71/95) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] management of BCCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 2-11-2004 .

[No. L -20012/ 170/94- IR(C- 1) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial dispute under Section 10( 1) ( d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 REFERENCE NO . 71 OF 1995

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL and their workmen .

APPEARANCES

Onbehalf of the workmen Mr. S.C. Gaur, Advocate

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma Advocate .

State : Jharkhand

: Industry: Coal.

Dhanbad, the 19th October, 2004.

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 170/ 94- IR( Coal - I) , dated, the 19th April, 2003 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (North) Colliery of M/s . BCCL in wrongful dismissal from service of Shri Suresh Roy, Miner/Loader w.e.f. 26-6-1989 is justified? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?" .

2. The case of the concerned workman according to Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on hisbehalf in brief is as follows :-

The sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman was appointed by the management as Miner / Loader in the year 1981. They disclosed that long after his appointment management issued chargesheet No. PS /87 (N) U.G. Mines / CS/76 dt. 14-8-1987 to him for committing alleged misconduct under clause 27 ( 2) and 27 ( 17) of the Certified Standing Ordres and also sintultaneously lodged FIR to local P.S. with the allegation of false impersonation and on the basis of that FIR a Criminal Case was started against lim U / S 419/420/467/468 1.P.C. and it was registered as G.R. Case No. 2427/87 . After receiving chargesheet the concemed workman submitted his reply denying all the charges brought against him but the management without accepting his reply started dontestic enquiry against him through Enquiry Officer appointed by thein arbitrarily 8999

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

knowing fully well that a Criminal Case was pending against him before the Learned Court of the Judicial Magistrate.

They submitted that in spite of raising protest by the concerned workman in the matter of proceeding with the hearing of domestic enquiry during pendency of the said criminal case the enquiry officer did not give any importance to the same and proceeded with the hearing of domestic enquiry.He further alleged that the enquiry officer did not give him proper opportunity to defend his case. In other words the management conducted perfunctory enquiry and dismissed him from service vide letter No. PS/ 89 /N /UG Mines/Dismissal/615 dt . 26-6-87 . He submitted that Leamed Judicial Magistrate vide order dt . 30-7-92 acquitted him from all charges brought against him by the prosecution in view of FIR lodged by the management . He submitted that against the said order of acquittal management did not preferany appeal.

He alleged that the action of the management in dismissing him from service under the fact and circumstances of the case was illegal , arbitrary and in violation of the principle of natural justice. Accordingly, he raised an Industrial Dispute for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . The concerned workman accordingly submitted his prayer to pass award directing the management to reinstate him in service from the date ofhis dismissal with full back wages and other consequential relief.

3. Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement-cum-rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring Union asserted in the Written Statement on behalf of the concerned workman.

as Suresh Roy S/o Late Bhagwan Roy and procuring false relationship certificate from Mukhiya entered in the service ofthemanagement in the year 1981 as Badli Miner/Loader. Thereafter, on the basis of Confidential information received from the Adviser (Security)dt. 31-1-87 a chargesheetdt . 14-8-87 was issued to the concerned workman for committing misconduct under clause 27 (2) and 27 ( 17) of the Certified Standing Orders applicable to the workman of the establishment . He was charged for commission of misconduct of theft, fraud, or dishonesty in connection with company's business and property and for giving false information regarding his name, age , father's name etc. at the time of his employment. However, the concerned workman denied all the charges brought against him. However, as the reply given by him was not satisfactory the Disciplinary Authority decided to hold domestic enquiry against him and accordingly, appointed Sri R.N. Ghosh D.P.M. (E) of Bhowra Area as the Enquiry Officer and Sri A.K. Singh , Senior Personnel Officer, Bhowra (North) asPresiding Officer of the management. Thereafter, when the enquiry officer fixed date for hearing domestic enquiry against him he submitted representation on 12-10-87 expressing his inability to attend hearing of the domestic enquiry proceeding till finalisation of the Criminal Case pending against him . They submitted that in response to that letter the Enquiry Officer by his enquiry notice dt . 15-10-87 fixed another date of enquiry on 11-11-87 and informed the concerned workman that the departmental enquiry was different from the prosecution in a Criminal Court and he should attend the enquiry on that date without fail . The concerned workman did not attend the enquiry fixed on 11-11-87 and submitted an application stating that it would not be possible for him to attend the enquiry as Criminal Case was pending against him . Thus he made it clear that he would not attend the enquiry to be conducted by the Enquiry Officer relating to the chargesheet issued to him. The enquiry officer again issued letterdt . 7/8-12-87 fixing the enquiry on 15-12-87. But he did not turn up and for which the Enquiry Officer proceeded with the enquiry exparte and thereafter submitted his reportdt. 20-12-89 holding him guilty to the charges brought against him. The Disciplinary Authority thereafter considering the Enquiry report and also corisidering all material facts dismissed the concernedworkman from his service by letterdt . 26-6-89. They submitted that Disciplinary Authority neither committed any illegality nor took any arbitrary decision violating the principle of natural justice in dismissing the concerned workman from his service and for which he is not entitled to get any relief in view of his praycr .

4. POINTS TO BE DECIEDED

"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (North) Colliery of M/ s . BCCL in wrongful dismissal from service of Shri Suresh Roy, Miner /Loader w.e.f. 26-6-89 is justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? "

They submittedthat the concerned workmantaking the name of Sri Suresh Roy S /o Late Bhagwan Roy entered in the service of the management as dependent son of late Bhagwan Roy, Ex -Mining Sardar of Bhowra (N) Colliery and was employed as Badli Miner/Loader in the year 1981. They disclosed that thereafter on confidential information it revealed that the actual son of Bhagwan Roy submitted application for his appointment as his dependent son and his application was under process by the management to offer him the job of Badli Miner /Loader at Bhowra (North) Colliery. However , said actual son of Suresh Roy got his appointment as Security Guard in CISF on 1-5-1980 and he was allotted Force No. 8017426. He was transferred from CISF Unit, BCCL to CISF unit of M.P.T. , Goa on 2-3-85. They alleged that the concerned workman taking advantage of the situation that late Bhagwan Roy was having only one son named Suresh Roy , which name had been mentioned in all his service particulars and on getting appointment as Security Guard in CISF there was no claimant for employment of dependent in place of said late Bhagwan Roy , he surreptitiously identifying himself 9000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5. FINDING WITH REASONS

Sri Suresh Roy,

D.C.L. 23/9 Incline

Bhowra (N) U.G. Mines .

CHARGE SHEET

It has been reported that your actual name is not Suresh Roy, but you are impersonating as Suresh Roy S/ o LateBhagwan Roy, Ex -Mining Sirdar ofBhowra (N) Colliery. Itis further learnt that you are alleged to be the brother of Late Bhagwan Roy , and got yourself into employment of BCCL as Badli Miner/Loader in the year 1981 as son of Late Bhagwan Roy through fraudulent and dishonest means by securing false relationship certificate from Local Mukhiya , Sri Suresh Roy, the real son of Late Bhagwan Roy, is working as Security Guard (Force No. 8017426) with C.I.S.F. and presently posted in ' GOA '

It transpires from the record that before taking up hearing ofthis case on merit it was taken into consideration whether domestic enquiry held against the concerned workman by the Enquiry Officer was fair ; proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice or not . The said issue on preliminary point was decided vide order No. 34dt. 12-10-99 with the observation that domestic enquiry held against the concemed workman was not fair , proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice and for which opportunity was given to the management to adduce evidence on merit with a view to establish the charge brought against the concerned workman . It transpires from the record that management with a view to substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman examined three witnesses viz . MW- 1 , MW- 2 and MW-3. On the contrary the concerned workman did not consider necessary to adduce any evidence in support ofhis claim.

Your above act amounts to misconduct under Clause No. 27 (2) and ( 17) of the Certified Standing Order applicable to this Establishment which reads as under :--

"27(2)-Theft, fraud of dishonesty in conneciton withthe Company's business or property . 27( 17 ) Giving of false information regarding his name , age, father's name , qualification or previous service at the time of employment. "

You are hereby asked to explain in writing within 48 hours from the receipt of this Chargesheet as to why Displinary action should not be taken against you .

Meanwhile you are hereby suspended pending enquiry .

Sd/-Illegible

Agent,

Bhowra (N) U.G. Mines . " Now let it be taken into consideration if the management on merit have, been able to substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman. Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides there is no dispute to hold that the concerned workman got his appointment in the year 1981 as Miner / Loader at Bhowra ( North ) Colliery . It is the contention of the management that the concerned workman claiming himself the son of late Bhagwan Roy who was Ex -Mining Sirdar of Bhowra ( N) Colliery got his appointment in that capacity on compassionate ground. They alleged that by producing false relationship certificate issued by the Mukhia and claiming himself as Suresh Roy S/o said Late Bhagwan Roy got his said appointment. They submitted that Suresh Roy was the only son of said Late Bhagwan Roy and as he got his service as Security Guard in CISF on 1-5-80 the concerned workman taking its full opportunity procured the said job of Miner/Loader by false impersonification. From the Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring union on behalf of the concerned workman I find no whisper if the concerned workman got his appointment as Miner/ Loader on compassionate ground after the death of Late Bhagwan Roy . Even in the rejoinder filed on behalf of the concerned workman there is no whisper as regards to the claim of the management as stated above . Management submitted that after receiving secret information over this issue they issued chargesheet to the concerned workman for commission of misconduct under clause 27 (2) and 27( 17) of the Certified Standing Order applicable to the workman of the management . The chargesheet during evidence on merit was marked as Ext . M - 5 . The chargesheet speaks as follows :-

"BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED

( SUBSIDIARY OF COAL INDIA LTD) BHOWRA COLLIERY, P.O. BHOWRA ( DHANBAD )

Ref. No. 18 / 87 / ( N) /U.G. Mines/CS/ 76

Dt. 14-8-87 .

To substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman , management examined three witnesses including Suresh Roy (MW- 3) who claimed himself as the son of Late Bhagwan Roy who was Ex- Mining Sirdar of Bhowra (N) Colliery . MW - 1 during his evidence produced the form B Register for the employees and I.D. Card Register also for the employees and the same were marked as Ext . M- 1 and M - 2 respectively . The particulars of the concerned workman in the Form B Register was recorded in Sl. No. 3949. It transpires that the concerned workman as Badli Miner /Loader got his appointinent on 19-10-81 andjoined in the service on 2-11- 81. In Col. No. 4 of this register Father's name of the concerned workman was recorded as Late Bhagwan Roy . He also in Col. No. 13 of this register put his signature as Suresh Roy . During cross - examination of MW- 1 this fact was not denied either by the sponsoring Union or the concerned workman himself. From the I.D. Card register Ext . M - 2 , I also find corroboration of the particulars of the concerned workman recorded in the Form B Register. Form B Register is considered as Statutory Register 9001 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रह्मयण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

M-2). The photographs of the concerned workman Suresh Roy appearing in this identification certificate absolutely talies with his photograph affixed in the I.D. Card register maintained by the management (Ext. M-2) . Therefore, it is absolutely clear that the photogrpah affixed in the certificate is the concerned workman who got his employment as Badli Miner /Loader under the management disclosing his father's name as Late Bhagwan Roy.

MW-3 during his evidence disclosed that his father Bhagwan Roy who was Mining Sardar died in the year 1975 and thereafter he submitted application for his appointment under the management but the management did not provide him any employment. Thereafter he got his employment under CISF as Security Guard and now he is posted atF. C.I. Dighaghat, Patna as Havilder. His old Force No. was 8017426 and his present No. is 802280068. During his evidence he categorically denied the photograph appearing in the certificate Ext . M- 2 as of his own. He further categorically denied that the concerned workman is the son of his father Bhagwan Roy . It transpires from the document marked as Ext . M - 1 that in response to the letter issued by the management the Asstt . Commandant , CISF forwarded a copy of Appointment letter of Suresh Roy son of Late Bhagwan Roy. Ext . M - 1 / 1 . Considering all these documents as mentioned above and also considering the evidence ofMW - 31 find no dispute to hold that Bhagwan Roy who was ex- Mining Sardar of Bhowra (N) Colliery had two sons and the name of his eldest son is Suresy Roy who got his appointment as Security Guard under CISF. The concerned workman has got his appointment as Badli Miner/Loaderdisclosing his name as Suresh Roy , Father's name as Bhagwan Roy . The home address given by him absolutely tallies with the same address of Suresh Roy in his service record maintained by CISF which is a security wing under Control of Ministry of Home affairs . It is not the case of the sponsoring Union that Bhagwan Roy had two sons in the same name i.e. Suresh Roy . It is clear considering evidence of the management that Suresh Roy of CISF is the son of Bhagwan Roy who was Ex-Mining Sardar. If the principle of Sec . 106 of the Evidence Act is taken into consideration the concerned workman cannot avoid his responsibility to establish that he is the son of lateBhagwan Roy who was Ex - Mining Sardar of Bhowra (N) Colliery and who got his appointment on compassionate ground . It is really astonishing to note that the concerned workman inspite of getting ample opportunity did not consider necessary to adduce any evidence in support of his claim. He also did not consider necessary to produce a single scrap of paper to show that he was actually the son of late Bhagwan Roy. It is seen that during domestic enquiry the concerned workman did not appear with a view to substantiate his claim . He although evaded in facing domestic enquiry taking the plea that a Criminal case was pending against him . He further disclosed thatlearned Magistrate acquitted him from all the charges

brought against him.

under the Mines Act . Therefore all particulars recorded therein are considered as valid until and unless its contents are not denied by cogent evidence . It is also not the case of the concerned workman that his father's name is not Late Bhagwan Roy and he did not get his appointment as Badli Miner / Loader . The specific claim of the management is that after the death of Bhagwan Roy , Ex- Mining Sardar of Bhowra (N) Colliery the concerned workman by false impersonification and using forged document got his employment on compassionate ground . It is not the case of the concerned workman that he did not get his appointment on compassionate ground as Badli Miner / Loader after the death ofBhagwan Roy . It is the contention ofthe management that Suresh Roy, the actual son of late Bhagwan Roy got his appointment at CISF and his Identity No. is 8017426. In support of this claim management relief on the letter issued by the present employer (marked as Ext. 4). From this letter it speaks clearly that father's name ofSuresh Roy who was employed under CISF was Bhagwan Roy. The address of Bhagwan Roy given in this letter is same and identical with the address recorded in col . No. 9 of Sl . No. 3949 of the Form B Register. Therefore, it is clear that in the same address two persons named Suresh Roy are coming forward whose father's name are same . Of the said two Suresh Roy one Suresh Roy was employed by the management on compassionate ground and the other Suresh Roy got his employment under CISF. In course of the evidence of MW - 1 leamed Advocate for the concerned workınan raised objections in marking the photocopy of the document marked as Ext . M- 4 . MW- 1 during his evidence disclosed that original of the letter as found missing they relied on its photo copy . Evidence Act is not striclty followed in recording evidence and also in the matter ofacceptance of documents in establishing any case under Industrial Disputes Act . Here the principle of evidence Act is followed in the matter of recording evidence and acceptance of any documents . It has been categorically submitted by MW - 1 that original letter is found missing and for which they relied on its Xerox copy. No evidence on the part of the sponsoring Union is forthcoming to show that the Xerox Copy of letter marked as Ext. M-4 was manufactured for the interest of this case . Accordingly , I find no cogent ground to uphold the objection raised by the Learned Advocate for the sponsoring Union . The copy ofappointment letter issued by Commandant CISF BCCL Jharia Ext . M. 1 shows that Suresh Roy son of Bhagwan Roy got his appointment as Security Guard in C.I.S.F. vide letter dt . 18-8-80. On the contrary concerned workman identifying himself as Suresh Roy son of Bahgwan Roy of the same address got his appointment under the management, as Badli Miner/Loader on 19-10-81 . Therefore appointment of the concerned workman was subsequent to the appointment of Suresh Roy son of Bhagwan Roy at CISF . Management in course of hearing relied on the identification certificate affixed with photograph of the concerned workman as Sureslı Roy issued by Mukhia (Ext.

9002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

It transpires that FIR was lodged against the concerned workman at local P.S. simultaneously with the issuance of chargesheet to him by the management for committing misconduct under clause 27 (2 ) and 27 ( 17) of the Certified Standing Order. Considering certified copy of the Judgment passed by Learned Judicial Magistrate Dhanbad Ext . W - 1 it is clear that police after completing investigation submitted chargesheet against the accused person i.e. the concerned workman U/ s . 419/420/467/468 I :P . Charge accordingly was framed against the accused persons under the sections referred to above. I have carefully considered the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate and it transpires clearly the accused person i.e. the concerned workman was aquitted from that case as the prosecution in course of trial failed to examine a single prosecution witness . Therefore , it is clear that the LearnedMagistrate could not got scope to pass judgment on merit for the worthlessness of the prosecution . Relying on the said order of the Learned Magistrate the representative of the concerned workman submitted that the order of dismissal passed by the management is liable to be set aside and in support of his claim he relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court reported in 2002 LAB IC . 1011. In para 14 & 15 of the said decision it has been observed as follows : -

Para-14

In ( 1992 ) I Lab L.J. 226 the Bombay High Court has held as under :-

"When once an employee is honourably acquitted completely exonerated at the criminal trial , normally the Port Trust could not have started proceeded with the departmental enquiry unless they have strong and sound reasons to do so . " ( Para - 13)

Para-15

The Supreme Court in AIR 1999 SC 1416 after noticing more than a dozen cases ultimatley rules in paras 34 and 36 asunder:-

"In the instant case the Superintendent of Police had raised the residential premises of the appellant and had recovered a mining sponge gold ball wieghing 4.5 grams and 1276 grams of gold bearing sand . It was on this basis that a criminal case was launched against him . On the set of facts , constituting the raid and recovery , departmental proceedings were initiated against the appellant as the recovery was treated to be a " misconduct. " On the service of the chargesheet , the appellant raised an objection that the departmental proceedings may be stayed as the basis of these proceedings was the raid conducted at his residence on which basis a criminal case had already been launched against him. Thefindings reco ded by the Inquiry Officer, indicate that the charges franied against the appellant were sought to be proved by the police officer and panchwitnesses , who have raided the house of the

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] appellant and effected recovery . They were the only eye witnesses examined by the inquiry officer , and the enquiry officer relaying upon the statements came to the conclusion that the charges were established against the appellant . The same witnesses were examined in the criminal case but the Court on consideration of the entire evidence , came to the conclusion that no search was conducted nor was any recovery made from the residence of the appel- lant. The whole case of the prosecution was thrown out and the appellant was acquitted . In this situation, therefore , where the appellant is acquitted by a Judicial pronouncement with the finding that the " raid and recovery" at the residence ofthe appellant were not proved, it would be unjust unfair and rather oppressive to allow the findings recorded at the ex parte departmental proceedings to stand . " The decision of Division Bench of this Court is revered by the Apex Court in the said case. After noticing all the judgments the Apex Court has rules that the workman is entitled for reinstatement subsequent to acquittal. I have followed the said judgment of mine in W.P. No. 1828/97 dated 24-3-2000 confirmed in W.A. No. 4244/0000 on 18-2-2000 . Following the saidjudgment I have again ruled in ILR 2000 Kar 229 ( Sic ) that no proceedings canbe initiated after acquittal on same/similar facts ." The decision speak clearly that the same were disposed of on merit after considering the evidence of the prosecution witnesses . Here in the instant case Learned Magistrate could not get any scope to dispose of the Criminal case pending against the concerned workman on merit because of the fact that the prosecution failed to examine a single witness. Moreover, the subject matter of the instant case is quite a different one . Here the specific charge of false impersonification , fraud , dishonesty has been brought against the concerned workman .

Leamed Advocate for the management relied on the decision reported in 2003 Supreme Court cases (L and S) 468. In the said decision their Lordships of the Hon'ble Apex Court iu para 15 observed clearly that acquittal in the Criminal case is not determinative of the comnussion of misconduct or otherwise , it is open to the authorities to proceed with the disciplinary proceedings notwithstanding acquittal in the criminal case.

Therefore in view of the observation made by the Hon'ble Apex Court there is no scope to say that the management committed any illegality to proceed with the hearing of the enquiry proceeding through Enquiry Officer appointed by the Disciplinary Authority . It is seen that taking the plea of pendency of the criminal case over the self same issue the concerned workman avoided to face the domestic enquiry started against him though he was fully aware ofthis fact. The concerned workman though pleaded for stay hearing of the domestic enquiry did not consider 9003 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रह्मयण 6 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

dismissed from his service by the Disciplinary Authority as the misconduct committed by him was established. Now the point for consideration is whether the concerned workman deserves any lenient view against the order of dismissal passed U/s . 11A of the I.D. Act . , 1947. Section 11A of the I.D. Act, 1947 speaks as follows:-

necessary to bring any stay order from the appropriate Court. As there was not stay order there was no hindrance on the part ofthe Enquiry Officer to proceed with the hearing of the enquiry. Excepting the plea taken by the concerned workman asdiscussed above he has failed to assign any other reason for causing his non -appearance at the time of hearing of the domestic enquiry proceeding though due notice was given to him by the Enquiry Officer.

"Where an Industrial dispute relating to the discharge or dismissal of a workman has been referred to a Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal for adjudication and in the course of the adjudication proceedings, the Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, as the case may be , is satisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal was not justified, it may, by its award set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of the workman onsuch terms and conditions , if any, as it thinks fit, orgive such other relief to the workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstances of the case may require. "

Therefore, according to the definition of this Section, it is to be looked into whether order of dismissal passed against the concerned workman was justified and if it was proportionate in relation to the misconduct committed by him. It has been exposed clearly in view of my discussions above that by false impersonification and also using false document exerted undue influence upon the management to procured his employment as Badli Miner /Loader knowing full well that he was not Suresh Roy and his father's name was not Bhagwan Roy and also knowing fully well that he never lived in the address of the said Bhagwan Roy. Such act on the part of the concerned workman was amounted to fraud and dishonesty in connection with the business of the management . Full opportunity was given to him to substantiate his claim not only in course ofhearing domestic enquiry proceeding but also in course of hearing the instant case on merit by this Tribunal but he has failed to avail the same .

The misconduct which the concerned workman committed is serious in nature and I do not find any cogent groundto say that the order of dismissal passed against him was unjustified and disproportionate to the offence committedby him. Accordingly I do not find any sufficient scope to reviewthe quantum of punishment imposed upon lum by the Disciplinary Authority invoking the provision as laiddown U/s . 11A of the I.D. Act. I , therefore , hold that the order of dismissal passed against the concerned workman bytheDisciplinary Authority was legal proper and justified as it did not violate the principle ofnatural justice .

The charge on the ground of committing misconduct which was brought against the concerned workman appears to be very serious in nature . He had ample scope to adduce evidence in support of his claim while the instant casewas taken up for hearing on merit. But lamentably he has failed to avail the opportunity of the same. A father might have two sons but it is unbelievable that the name of the said two sons will be same. MW-3 during his evidence disclosed that he was the eldest son of his father andjoined as Security Guard under CISF. Considering the materials on record which I have already discussed above it has been established that MW-3 i.e. Suresh is the actual son of lateBhagwan Roy who was Mining Sardar at Bhowra (N) Colliery. The concerned workman also has claimed Bhagwan Roy of the same address as his father but has failedto produce a single scrap of paper though taking the principle of Sec . 106 of the Evidence Act there is scopeto say that onus was shifted on him to substantiate his claim . His only contention is that as he was acquitted from the Criminal Case he should be considered as the son of late Bhagwan Roy . I have already discussed above that the said Criminal case was not disposed of on merit . It was the fault of the prosecution why they could not examine a single witness but for that reason there is no scope to draw conclusion that the concerned workman was the son of lateBhagwan Roy Ex -Mining Sardar of Bhowra (N) Colliery and got his employment on compassionate ground after the death of his said father. It is the specific claim of the management that the concerned workman knowing fully well that he was not the son of Bhagwan Roy procured the false proof of indentification from Mukhia and used the same for procuring his employment that he was Suresh Roy son of late Bhagwan Roy. The concerned workman had ample scope to produce relevant papers to show that he is Suresh Roy but that too he has failed to produce. There is sufficient scope to hold that the concerned workman evaded himself to face the hearing knowing fully that he is not actual Suresh Roy son of late Bhagwan Roy. Had that not been so there was no reason for him to appear and participate in course ofhearing of this case alongwith all supported material documents .

Inthe result, the following Award is rendered:-

Inview ofmy discussions above and also after careful consideration of all the material facts and circumstances I hold that the management have been able to substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman under clause 27 (2) and 27 ( 17) of the Certified Standing orders.

The action of the management of Bhowra (North) Colliery of M/s . BCCL in wrongful dismissal from service of Shri Suresh Roy, Miner/Loader w.e.f. 26-6-89 is justified. Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief." Itisadmitted fact that the concerned workman was

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer 3422 G1/0448 9004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2004

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of Koyla Ispat Mazdoor Panchayat for regularisation of Sri Chota Chandra Paswan on the post of Dhowra Supervisor by the management of M/s . BCCL BastacolaArea is legal and justified? If so , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled and from what date ? " का. आ. 3059.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा ० को ० को० लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 119/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2. The case of the concerned workmen according to the written statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on his behalf, in brief, is as follows :-

[सं. एल -20012 /525/2000- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd November , 2004

S.O. 3059. -ln pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 119/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Dhanbad - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relationto the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-11-2004.

[No. L - 20012/525/2000 - IR(C- 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2), DHANBAD .

In the matter of a reference U/S 10 ( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947.

Reference No. 119 of 2001

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management ofBastacola Area of M/s . BCCL Ltd.

AND

Their Workmen .

PRESENT : Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer .

APPEARANCES :

For the Employers

Thesponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman initially got his appointment at Kujama Colliery under Bastacola area by the erstwhile employer on 11-10-71 and was regularised after nationalisation of the said colliery on 1-5-92 . They submitted that in the year 1984 management entrusted the concerned workman with thejob of Electrical Helper in Category - II . They submitted that in the year 1992 there was natural wastages and for which acute shortage of clerical job come into existence . Management with a view to meet such exigency, after proper scrutiny etc. engaged the concerned workman as clerk in the Lamp Cabin Room and since then he started discharging his duties as clerk in Grade - III continuously to the satisfaction of his superiors. They submitted that in the year 1997 said Kujama colliery was closed but a large number of quarters were occupied by their workers though they were transferred to other colliery . As a result the management with a view to upkeep the said residential quarters engaged the concerned workman as Dhowra Clerk inClerical Grade - III and started working in that capacity since December , 1997. They submitted that the concerned workman thereafter personally and through his sponsoring union submitted several representations to the management for his regularisation as Dhowra Supervisor inclerical Grade- III and also claimed payment of difference ofwages of clerical Grade- III and Category - III , but as the management did not consider his such prayer he raised an industrial dispute for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication. The sponsoring union accordingly submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to regularise him as Dhowra Supervisor from December , 1997 and also to pay difference ofwages since February, 1992.

: Shri R.N. Ganguly, Advocate .

For the Workmen

: Shri S.C. Gour, Advocate .

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal.

Dated, the 25th October, 2004 .

3. Management on the contrary after filing written statement - cum- rejoinder have denied all the claim and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the written statement on behalf of the concerned workman .

AWARD

By Order No. L - 200 12/525/2000 ( C -I ) dated 29-3-2001 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub-sectión (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

They submitted that after introduction of Cadre Scheine for clerical staff there is no scope for regularisation ofany workman in the said clerical cadre . They submitted thatthe post of clerk in Grade - III is only filled up through test/ selection from the eligible candidates on the basis of merit- cum- suitability. The selected candidates are empanelled and job in the post clerk is given to the empanelled candidates according to availability of vacancy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9005

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

They disclosed that the concerned workman was electrical helper and according to cadre scheme he was to be promoted to the post of electrician in Category - IV from the post of electrical helper provided he possesses wireman's certificate prescribed for the said post. From category- IV he is eligible to get his promotion in Category- Vand Category -VI after obtaining Supervisor's Certificate. Even he may be promoted to the post of Asstt . Foreman, Foreman and Foreman Incharge.

electrical helper in Category - II and thereafter in the year 1992 he was engaged as Cap Lamp Issue Clerk. It is further contention of the concerned workman that in the year 1997 Kujama Colliery was declared closed and the workmen engaged in the said colliery were transferred to different places . He disclosed that Mundrika Prasad who was Dhowra Supervisor posted at Kujama Colliery also was transferred to Lodna Colliery and for which the said post fell vacant . In the year 1997 management for the interest of up-keeping the residential quarters of the workers of Kujama Colliery engaged him as Dhowra Supervisor and in support of his claim he relied on the letter issued by the management marked Exts . W- 1 , W2 and W5 . He alleged thatinspite of his rendering service as Dhowra Supervisor continuously and uninterruptedly since 1997 the management , inspite of submitting representation by him did not consider necessary to regularise him.

They alleged that the concerned workman with a view to get undue advantage fabricated certain documents in connivance with the local management to show that he was entrusted with the job of Dhowra Supervisor and relying on the same placed his demand for change of cadre from time-rated category to clerical grade. They submitted that local management have been strictly instructed through various circulars not to divert any time-rated workers on thejob of clerical nature . Accordingly , local management have no authority to engage any time-rated orpiece - rated workers on the job of clerical nature . They submitted that even if for temporary purpose without obtaining due approved from the Headquarter any such orderis issued in favour of any workman, the same should be considered illegal and without jurisdiction and that workman should be debarred from demanding any benefit therefrom.

They submitted the management of any colliery is debarred from issuance of any order converting a time rated workman in Categories - I , II or so to Clerical Gr . III. Accordingly, they submitted that if the workman obtained any such order in connivance with local management that bears no vlaue in the eye of law. to act it upon . They in the circumstances submitted prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman/sponsoring union .

Points to be decided

Onthe contrary , from the evidence of MW- 1 who was Manager from 1997 to 1998 and again started discharging his duties as Manager, Kujama Colliery during hisevidence stated that initially the concerned workman was appointed as General Mazdoor in Categry - l and thereafter he was posted as electrical helper . He disclosed further that in the year 1995 the said colliery as declared closedmajority of the workmen though left the said colliery management provided aiternate job to some workers for maintenance ofwater, electric supply and also for sanitation and other protection works etc. The witness disclosed that during 1998 Mundrika Singh, Dhowra Supervisor was transferred to Lodna area and for which the concerned workman was authorised to work as Dhowra Supervisor but as he did not do so he was provided with the job of FireProtection work in 2002. This witness disclosed that thenManager engaged the concerned workman to perform the job of Cap Lamp Issue Clerk as per Coal Mines Regulation from 1992 to 1995 .

4. " Whether the demand of Koyla Ispat Mazdoor Panchayat for regularisation of Sri Chota Chandra Paswan on the post of Dhowra Supervisor by the management of Ms/. BCCL Bastacola Area is legal and justified ? Ifyes, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled and from what date?"

Finding with reasons

5. It transpires from the record that the sponsoring union with a view to substantiate the claim of the concerned workman examined him as WW -1 . Management also in support of their claim examined one witness as MW- 1 .

It is the specific claim of the concerned workman that as Cap Lamp Issue Clerk he continuously and uninterruptedly discharged his duties from 1992 to 1995 and in support of his claim he relied on the certificate issued by the Manager , Kujama Colliery, Ext. W- 3 . From this certificate it transpires that the concerned workman worked for more than 240 days in each year from 1992 to 1995. The concerned workman also relied on the certificate issued by the Manager, Kujama Colliery , Ext. W-2 to show that since 8-12-97 he was authorised to discharge his duties as Dhowra Supervisor and in that capacity till the date of issuance of this letter dated 23 /31-7-99 he performed his duties.

Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides and also considering evidence of WW - 1 and MW - 1 there is no dispute to hold that the concerned workman initially joined at Kujama Colliery under Bastacola Area as a workman in Category - I as far back as in the year 1971. It is the claim of the concerned workman that the management in the year 1984 entrusted him with the job of

Itisadmitted fact that the post of Cap Lamp Issue Clerk as well as the post of Dhowra Supervisor comes under Clerical Grade - III . It is the specific contention ofthe Management that the post of Clerk Grade - III is a cadre post and the said post is filled up from the successful candidates through selection/ test as per provisions of [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

9006

any importance to this letter with a view to consider the claim ofthe concerned workman .

১ NCWA. They further submitted that there is no scope as per NCWA to change the cadre of any workman without following the procedure as laid down therein . It is their contention that the concerned workman was electrical helper in Cat . II and for which without facing selection/ test there was no scope to get his posting in clerical Grade- III which comes under Cadre post. Moreover , the Local Manager of the colliery holds no authority to post any workman of Category - Il to the post ofClerk in Gr . III without following the procedure and approval of the Headquarter. It istheir specific allegation that the concerned workman in connivance with local management manufactured the documents marked as Exts . W - 1 , W- 2 and W-3 and for which relying on the same there is no scope to uphold the claim of the concerned workman.

It has been admitted by the concerned workman that neither he appeared in the selection/ test nor he received any letter of appointment authorising him to work as Cap Lamp Issue Clerk or Dhowra Supervisor in Clerk Gr . Ш.

From the proposal marked as Ext. W - 5 it transpires that as regular Dhowra Supervisor , Mundrika Singh was transferred , the concerned workman was asked to look- after the job of Dhowra Supervisor at Kujama Colliery . Therefore, there is no scope to arrive into conclusion to theeffect that the concerned workman got his appointment as Dhowra Supervisor . No evidence is forthcoming to the effect that continuously he performed such job . On the contrary, MW-1 in his evidence disclosed that the concerned workman did not perform his duties as Dhowra Supervisor though he was asked to do so . This fact will get its support from the letter dated 21-9-99 , Ext . W- 1 . Inspite ofthis fact the Manager , Kujama Colliery issued a certificate dated 23/31-7-99 , Ext . W-2 , certifying that the concernedworkman was working as Dhowra Supervisor since 8-12-97 on transfer of Mundrika Singh . The evidence ofMW - 1 and facts disclosed in the letter marked as Ext. W- 1 finds no bearing with the contents of the certificate, marked as Ext . W-2.

Considering all these aspects there is sufficient reason to believe that some officials were very much interested to arrange regularisation of the concerned workman as Dhowra Supervisor in Grade - III knowing fully well about the procedure as per NCWA how a workman is considered eligible to get his regularisation in Clerk Grade- III and also knowing fully well of the fact that there was strict prohibition in switching over the designation of one workman in Grade - III from his category.

MW- 1 in his evidence disclosed that after Mundrika Singh , Dhowra Supervisor was transferred to Lodna Area from Kujama Colliery in the year 1998. The concerned workman though was authorised to discharge his duties as Dhowra Supervisor in his place did not discharge his duties so . In this connection letter dated 14-5-99 marked as Ext . W - 5 may be taken into consideration. From this letter it transpires that the concerned workman , electrical helper was engaged in cap lamp room since 19-5-92, also marked as Cap Lamp Issue Clerk as and when required after May , 1995 he was engaged in other alternative T/R jobs and after transfer of Sri Mundrika Singh, he was authorised to work as Dhowra Supervisor. Aproposal was made by the Manager, Kujama Colliery addressed to Dy . C.P.M. , Bastacola Area- IX for regularisation of the concerned workman to the post of Dhowra Supervisor alongwith others.

From this proposal Ext. W- 5 it transpires clearly that the concerned workman though was engaged in Cap Lamp Room in the year 1992 was only authorised to work as Cap Lamp Issue Clerk as and when required . Accordingly there is no scope to say at all that from 1992

Considering all aspects carefully there is sufficient reason to believe that there was no transparency in making claim of the concerned workman for his regularisation in Grade-III from Category - II . It is seen that some officials of the local management for the reason best known to them issued soine favourable orders in favour of the concerned workman knowing fully well about standing direction of the Headquarters . They were fully aware about eligibility criteria of getting promotion in Clerk Grade - III by a workman . They were also fully aware that as per the eligibility criteria the concerned workman was not at all eligible to get any authorisation to discharge his duties as Dhowra Supervisor but that was done which proved clearly that a nexus was created in between them and the concerned workman.

As the concerned workman has failed to establish hiseligibility to get his regularisation in Clerical Grade- III asDhowra Supervisor from Category - II , 1 consider that he is not entitled to get any relief.

5. In the result , the following award is rendered-

The demand of Koyla Ispat Mazdoor Panchayat for regularisation of Sri Chota Chandra Paswan on the post of to 1995 he worked as Cap Lamp Issue Clerk continuously and put his attendance for more than 240 days in each year in that capacity. Awaring fully well of this fact the Manager, Kujama Area issued a letter to Dy . С.Р.М. , Bastacola Area - IX dated 10-10-96 Ext. W- 3 showing that the concerned workman as Cap Lamp Issue Clerk performed his duties for 263 days , 268 days , 241 days and 274 days during 1992, 1993 , 1994 and 1995 respectively . Considering my discussion above there is sufficient reason to draw conclusion that the Manager in collusion with the concerned workman issued such letter to Dy . C.P.M. Accordingly I find no scope to give भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Dhowra Supervisor by the management of M/ S . BCCL Bastacola Area is not legal and justified. Accordingly, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3060.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा०को०को० लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योंगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 93/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को2-11-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/204/98- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd November , 2004

S.O. 3060.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. 93/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers.in relation to management ofBCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-11-2004 .

[No. L-20012/204/ 98 - IR (C - 1 ) ]

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) DHANBAD In the matter of reference U/ s 10 ( 1 ) ( d)(2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947.

Reference No. 93 of 1999

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Kusunda Area

AND

TheirWorkman

PRESENT : Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer APPEARANCES :

For the Employers

: Shri S. N. Sinha , Advocate

: None

Forthe Workman

: Industry : Coal State: Jharkhand

Dated, Dhanbad, the 18th October , 2004 .

342261/04-49

9007

AWARD

By Order No. L - 20012/ 204/ 98 - I.R. ( C - I ) dated 29-1-99 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Kusunda Area of BCCL in not considering the application dated 23-8-95 of Smt . Soman Mati Kamin for V.R.S. (F) and not giving her the benefit of the scheme is justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"

2. The case of the concerned workman according to the written statement submitted by the sponsoring union on her behalf is as follows :-

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workman is working as Ash Kamin at Kusunda Colliery since 1971. They submitted that the management formulated V.R. Scheme for female employees of the company to the effect that their male sons will be taken to the post of Miner/Loaders in their place who are below the age of 35 years on the day they retire from the service under the said scheme . In response to that call the concerned workman submitted application in proper form to the management on 23-8-95 alongwith other female workers for employment of her son . Chatram Panka . It has been alleged that the management though accepting the applications of other female workers forwarded the same to the higher authority for consideration and though their sons had been employed under the said scheme as Miner/Loader did not consider her application and thereby indulged pick and choose policy in accepting the V.R. Even the management did not consider necessary to inforin the concerned work near the ground for refusal of his prayer when in similar situation they accepted the V.R. of other female workers . They alleged that the decisions of the management was illegal , arbitrary and it violated the principle of natural justice . In the circumstances , the concerned workman raised an industrial dispute through sponsoring union for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . The sponsoring union accordingly submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to provide employment to the son of the concernedworkman accepting her V.R.

They submitted that the concerned workman approached the management for providing employment to one person named Chatram Panka as her dependant 9008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] son after accepting her resignation under V.R. Scheme for female workers . She made her applicaiton after the expiry of the claim and also failed to produce any document in support ofher claim that Chatram Panka was her dependent son .

submitted application to the management alongwith other female workers on 23-8-95 with prayer for providing employment of her son Chatram Panka accepting her resignation. It has been alleged by the concerned workman that the management though accepting V.R. of other female workers provided employment to their sons refused to consider her prayer illegally , arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice.

They submitted further that over the claim of the concerned workman an enquiry was made and it was found that the concerned lady had no son and she was influenced by some leaders to induct one stranger in that name describing him as her son. As the concerned lady failed to support her claim with relevant documents her case was not considered but further time was given to her to submit relevant documents . Inspite of giving time the concerned workman failed to produce any cogent paper in support of lier claim, as a result her claim though could not be considered she was allowed to continue in her employment.

On the contrary from the contention of the managernent it appears that when an enquiry was made over the claim of the concerned workman it exposed that she had no son named Chatram Panka . Accordingly , she was asked to submit necessary paper in support of her claim that inspite of giving opportunity she failed to produce any cogent paper in support of her claim. It is the allegation of the management that when the concerned workman had no son of her own she under influence of some leaders claimed for employment of a stranger , who was not actually her son. It is the contention of the management that the said scheme was launched to provide employment to the genuine dependant of the female worker and not to the fictitious person . The management further submitted that it was their discretion whose employment should be given accepting resignation of female workers . Therefore as a matter of right no female workers is eligible to claim such employment.

They further submitted that no workman had the right to demand for acceptance of resignation under V.R.S. ( F) and it was purely at the option of the management to consider each case on its own merit before accepting resignation of a particular woman and suitability of a person required to be appointed as well as the genuinity of the relationship . In case of doubtful nature , the management had every right to reject such application without entering into establishing the falsity or genuinity of such relationship. In the circumstances they submitted that the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief and for which her claim is liable to be rejected.

Points to he decided :

4. "Whether the action of the management of Kusunda Area of BCCL in not considering the application dated 23-8-95 of Smt . Soman Mati Kamin for V.R.S. (F) and not giving her the benefit of the Scheme is justified ? If not. to what relief the workman is entitled to? "

Finding with reasons :

5. it transpires from the record that the sponsoring union inspite of getting ample opportunities did not consider necessary to adduce any evidence with a view to substantiate their claim. The management also have failedto adduce any evidence . As no material evidence is forthcoming on either side let me consider relying on the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides if the claim of the sponsoring union stands on substantial footing or not with a view to get relief as prayed for.

Considering the facts and circumstances it is therefore clear that though the concerned workman placed claim for employment of her son named Chatram Panka on the basis of V.R. Scheme the management did not accept her prayer taking the ground that on enquiry it revealed that the said person was not her son . There is no dispute tohold that the management through that Scheme assured employment of genuine dependant of the female workers. It was therefore expected that female workers who intended to opt that Scheme would come forward with clean hand . It is the claim of the concemed workman that the management though considered the claim of other female workers did not consider her claim . The management before refusing to accept claim of the concerned workman gave her opportunity to produce relevant papers to show that Chatram Panka was her son . Considering submission of the management it transpires that the concerned workman failed to avail that opportunity . There is no material to this effect that they whimsically or arbitrarily rejected her claim . No satisfactory explanation was assigned by her about the reason for non production of relevant papers to satisfy quarry of the management . 1 consider that the management did not commit any illegality asking the concerned workman to produce relevant documents particularly when question of giving employment was involved.

Considering the pleadings of both sides I find no dispute to hold that concerned workman Sint. Soman Mati Kantin was posted at Kusunda Colliery as " Ash Kamin " . There is also no dispate to hold that the management launched V.R. Scheme for the females with the assurance that one sone of the female worker will be provided with employntent of Miner / Loader if any female worker tenders her resignation and the same is accepted by the management . It is the contention of the sponsoring union that in response to that call the concerned workman

Even the sponsoring union at the time of hearing before this Tribunal got ample scope to substantiate 9009 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/अग्रहायण 6, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2), AT DHANBAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. Biswas , PresidingOfficer

their claim that Chetram Panka was the actual son of the concerned workman and the management inspite of getting knowledge of this fact illegally refused to give him employment accepting her resignation under V.R. Scheme. I find no hesitation to say that inspite of getting ample opportunity they did not consider necessary to prove the claim in question. As onus absolutely was on the concerned workman to satisfy her claim she cannot avoid herresponsibility to prove the same.

Inthe matter ofan Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 84 of 1999

PARTIES

: Employers in relation to the management ofTISCO . and their workman.

APPEARANCE :

Onthebehalf of workman Mr. K. Chakravorty, Advocate.

It should be taken into consideration that facts disclosed in the pleading cannot be considered as substantive piece of evidence in absence of its corroboration. As the sponsoring union inspite of getting ample opportunity failed to substantiate their claim just relying on the facts disclosed in the written statement there is no scope to uphold their contention and for which they are not entitled to get any relief.

: Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate.

On the behalf of the employers

5. In the result , the following award is passed suomoto by this Tribunal :

: Industry: Coal.

State : Jharkhand

Dated, Dhanbad, the 19th October, 2004

AWARD

The action of the management of Kusunda Area of M/sB.C.C. Ltd. in not considering the application dated 23-8-1995 of Smt. Soman Mati Kamin for V.R.S. (F) and not giving her the benefit of the scheme is justified. Accordingly, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

The Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/ 15/98 - IR( C - 1 ) , dated, the 29th January, 1999 .

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2004

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Sijua Colliery of M/ s TISCO in dismissing Sri Jagdish Prasad, Driller w.e.f. 13-7-1996 (on the ground of unauthorised absence for a few days ) from the services of the company is justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?" का. आ. 3061.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार टिस्को के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 84/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-11-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 20012/15/98- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

2. The case of the concerned workman according to written statement submitted by the sponsoring union onhis behalf in brief is as follows :-

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd November, 2004

تو S.O. 3061. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 84/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Dhanbad- ll now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of TISCO and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-11-2004.

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workman was a permanent workman at Sijua Colliery. They submitted that the said workman due to reasonable cause remained himself absent from duty and the reason for absence was duly communicated to the management with a prayer to sanction leave . They alleged that the management showing vindictive attitude dismissed the concerned workman from his service by letter dt. 9/12-7-96 . They submitted that the concerned workman neither received any chargesheet nor any notice of enquiry. They further alleged that relying on exparte enquiry report the management took that illegal , and arbitrary decision violating the principle of naturaljustice.

[No. L-20012/15 /98 -IR (C - 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

9010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] They disclosed that after passing the said order concerned workman submitted representation to the management with a prayer for his reinstatement in service but to no effect and for which he raised an Industrial Dispute before the ALC( C ) , Dhanbad for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The concerned workman accordingly submitted his prayer to pass award directing the management to reinstate him in service from the date of his disınissal with back wages and other consequential relief.

"Jharkahnd Sambad" on 30-6-96 and simultaneously a copy of the notice also was displayed on the notice board. They submitted that inspite of taking all steps fer procuring attendance of the concerned workman when the same failed the Enquiry Officer on 4-7-96 took up hearing of the enquiry proceeding exparte and submitted his report on 5-7-96, holding him guilty to the charge brought against him. They disclosed that the Disciplinary Authority considering the enquiry report and also considering all aspects carefully dismissed the concemed workman from his service by letter dt . 12-7-96. They disclosed that the action taken by the management in dismissing the concerned workman from his service was legal and bonafide and in accordance with the provision ofCertified Standing order and for which he is not entitled to get any relief.

4. Points to be decided

"Whether the action of the management of Sijua Colliery of M / s . TISCO in dismissing Sri Jagdish Prasad, Driller w.e.f. 13-7-1996 (on the ground of unauthorised absence for a few days) from the services of the company isjustified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled? "

5. Finding with reasons .

It transpires from the record that before taking up hearing ofthis case on merit it was taken into consideration ifdomestic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice. The said issue on preliminary point was disposed of vide order No. 2t )dt . 9-7-2003 finding that domestic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair , proper and in accordance with the principle of naturaljustice.

Now the point which is to be taken into consideration on merit is if the charge of committing misconduct under clause 19 ( 16 ) of the Certified Standing Orderbrought against the concerned workman has well been established or not and if so , whether the order of dismissal issued against him was justified as per provision laiddown U/ s 11 A of the l. D. Act, 1947 .

In course of hearing the chargesheet di . 5/7-6-96 which was issued against the concerned workman under clause 19(11) ) of the Certified Standing Order on the allegation of committing misconduct was marked as Ext . M - 1 . The charge which was brought agsinst the concerned workman is as follows :

"You have absented yourself from duty without permission and satisfactory cause front 2t) -5-96 to tilldate.

3. Management on the contrary after filling written Statement-cum-rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring Union asserted in the Written Stateinent on behalf of the concerned workman . They submitted that the concerned workman was appointed on 6-6-77 as piece rated worker and was placed asAssistant Driller with effect from 21-5-99 and thereafter he got his promotion as Driller w.e.f. 21-1-80 . They submitted that the concerned workman was sus -pended for 5 days from 18-8-81 on the ground of commission of misconduct of unauthorised absence from duties without permission or satisfactory cause . He was again sus -pended for 5 days from 13-11-81 on the charge of unauthorised absence . He was again sus - pended for 10 days with effect from 16-6-92 . He was sus -pended for 5 days with effect from 26-12-92 . He was again sus - pended for 10 days for munauthorised absence w.e.f. 21-10-99 . The management disclosing the conduct of the concerned workman as stated above submitted that he grew up the habit of absence from his duties without permission or justification and in - spite of repcated warnings and imposition of penalty of sus-pension he continued to remain absent from his duties at his own sweet will without permission, and without information and without satisfactory cause. They disclosed that as the concerned workman again started himself absent from duty w.e.f. 210-5-96 without information or permission and also without showing any cause the disciplinary authority issued chargesheet No. 100dt. 5/7-6-96 under clause 19( 16 ) of certified Standing order applicable to the establishment for committing misconduct. They submitted that the concerned workman did not bother to give any reply to the chargesheet . They submitted that as the concerned workman was neither found in the colliery nor at his local address the said chargesheet was sent to the address of his native village by registered post . Thereafter management started domestic enquiry against the concerned workman through enquiry officer duly appointed by them. Before holding the saiddomestic enquiry on 18-6-96 again notice was issued at Sijun Colliery office and at his home address butthe concerned workman did not turn up and for which againnotice was sent to his home address by Regd. Post informing the date of enquiry as 4-7-96 . A copy of the said notice also was published in the local newspaper

The above act on your part amounts to unauthorised absence for more than 10 days .

9011 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27, 2004/ अग्रहायण 6 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

You are allowed 72 hours from the date of receipt hereof to give your explanation. Any representation that you may make in this connection will be taken into consideration before passing order."

Therefore , from the chargesheet it transpires that the concerned workman remained himself absented from duty without permission and satisfactory cause from 20-5-96 till date of issuance of chargesheetdt . 5/7-6-96 . The contention of the management is that it was not the solitary occasion when the concerned workman remained himself absent from duty but previously on several occasions he committed same misconduct and for which they were compelled to suspend him from work. They alleged that on 13-11-81 , 16-6-92, 22-7-92, 26-12-92 and 21-10-99 for committing misconduct on the ground of unauthorised absence the concerned workman was suspended from work for 5 days , 10 days , 5 days, 5 days and 10 days respectively . As per allegation of the management during the period from 13-11-81 to 21-10-94 the concerned workman had to face suspension order atleast on five occasions for committing misconduct on the ground of unauthorised absence . In course of hearing the service sheet of the concerned workman was marked as Ext . M - 10 which has supported this claim of the management . It is the specific allegation of the management that the concerned workman actually developed the habit of remaining himself unauthorisedły by absence from duty. They submitted that for such unauthorised absence their production was effected. The concerned workman during his cross- examination though denied this allegation of the management admitted that presence ofdrillman is very much needed for the interest ofproduction . Therefore , it is clear that the management did not get the service of the concerned workman who was a drillman for his absence during the period in question.

The postal receipts Exts . W -3 and W -3 / 1 shows that the concerned workman sent some article to the management first on 25-5-96 and then on 3-6-96 . It is the contention ofthe concerned workman that he sent medical certificate and gave information to the management about his ailment . According to the allegation of the management the concerned workman started remaining himself absent from duty with effect from 20-5-96 . It is seen that within five days of his remaining himself absent from duty he first sent information to the managernent. He sent second information to the management on 3-6-96 . It is not the claim of the management that the address given in the postal receipt was not the address of the management . It is also not the case of the management that they did not receive any such articles from the concerned workman as perthe postal receipt relied on by the concerned workman. Therefore, presumption should be drawn that management received some information from the concerned workman , particularly when it has not been established that the concerned workman in connivance with the postal Deptt . procured the said two postal receipts . It is the specific claim of the concerned workman that while he was on sanctioned leave he went to his father - in - law's house and there he fell ill from jaundice . The concerned workman during his evidence relied on the prescription issued by Dr. K. C. Roy for his treatment . This prescription during his evidence was marked as Ext . W- 1 which shows that he remained under treatment of the said doctor with effect from 21-5-96. During cross- examination the concerned workman admitted that for diagnosis of his ailment the doctor did not advise him for blood test but he relied on the report of his urine . Relying on this fact Ld. Advocate for the management raised his voice about genuinity of theprescription issued by the said doctor. It is absolutely within the domain of the doctor that he will diagnose the disease of a patient and for which there is no scope to blame the concerned workman . It will also not be wise enough to draw conclusion that the prescription which the concerned workman relied on is a false and fabricated one . There was scope on the part of the management to summon the doctor with a view to ascertain the veracity of the prescription but the management did not consider necessary to do so . The management also has failed to produce any cogent evidence in support of their claim that the medical prescription and medical certificate issued by Dr. K. C. Roy were fake and the same were manufactured by the concerned workman for the interest of the case . Accordingly, I find no scope to accept the contention of the management. Considering the medical papers there is sufficient scope to draw conclusion that the concerned workman was actually suffering from jaundice and for which he could not attend to his place of duty . From the postal receipts marked as Ext . W -3 and W-3 / 1 there is sufficient scope to arrive into conclusion that he reported the cause of his absence to the inanagement in due course

oftime.

It isthe specific allegation of the management that the concerned workman without giving any information and also without taking permission and also without any satisfactory cause started remaining himself absent from duty with effect from 20-5-96. Concerned workman during his evidence disclosed that he went on leave duly sanctioned by the management . This fact during his evidence was not denied by the management . He disclosed that while he was on sanctioned leave he went to his father's in - laws house where he fell ill from jaundice and he sent medical certificate to the management and in support of his claim he relied on two postal receipts marked as Ext . W-3 and W-3/ 1 . He further disclosed that during the period ofhis ailment he remained under treatment of Dr. K. C. Roy and in support of his claim he relied on the prescription and medical certificate issued by the said doctor marked as Ext . W- 1 and W-2 .

9012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

committing misconduct . It is seen that the hearing of the enquiry proceeding was taken up ex-parte as it has been established that the concerned workman was not found present where the notices were issued . Natually it was not within the knowledge of the concerned workman about the said domestic enquiry. It has not been established that the concerned workman with a view to avoid that enquiry issued false address where he stayed during the period of his ailment . In the circumstances it is very hard to accept that for taking future plea he manufactured the documents in question. It is fact that the concerned workman did not inform the address of his father - in - law where he lived during the period of his ailment but that cannot establish that he took false plea about his ailment .

Accordingly after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances I hold that the management have failed to establish the charge of misconduct against the concerned workman beyond shadow of doubt and for which I hold that the order of dismissal passed by the managenient against him is liable to be set aside .

As a result of the order of dismissal the concerned workman was deprived ofjoining his duty and for which he was deprived of getting his wages . During long period from the date of dismissal he remained idle without service and of any earning for his livlihood only due to adamant attitude of the management . There was scope on the part of the management to consider the veracity of the Medical papers which the concerned workman relied on in support of his ailment but they did not consider necessary to do so . There is reason to believe that during this period the concerned workman not only incurred financial loss but also suffered mental pain and agony which the management is liable to compensate . I therefore , hold that the concerned workman not only will be reinstated to his service from the date of dismissal but also the management shall be liable to pay 310% of his back wages with all consequential relief till the date of his reinstatement in service.

In the result , the following Award is rendered :-

"The action of the management of Sijua Colliery of M/ s . TISCO , in dismissing Sri Jagdish Prasad, Driller w.e.f. 13-7-1996 ( on the ground of unauthorised absence for a few days ) from the services of the company is not justified . Consequently , the concerned workman is entitled to be reinstated to his original job with 30 % back wages and other consequential benefits from the date of his dismissal to the date of his reinstatement . "

The management is directed to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the observation made above.

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer It is the contention of the management that the concerned workman was in the habit of remaining himself absent unauthorisedly . They submitted that during the period from 18-8-81 to 21-10-94 the concerned workman for committing misconduct on the ground of his unauthorised absence was chargesheeted on five occasions and on all the occasions order of suspension was issued against him as part of his punishment. This fact has not been denied by the concerned workman . He received punishment for the misconduct committed by him . It is to be taken into consideration that each case of his committing misconduct was dealt with by the management independently . Therefore , onus on the management to establish that the alleged misconduct which the concerned workman committed in the instant case has its bearing with the previous case . In the instant case it is the specific allegation of the management that the concerned workman started remaining himself absent front duty with effect from 20-5-96 without information , without permission and without sufficient cause . As such unauthorised absence amounted to misconduct and a chargesheet was issued to him . The concerned workman in his evidence categorically stated that he went on sanctioned leave . This fact was not denied by the managentent by adducing cogent evidence . It is the contention of the concerned workman that during the period of his sanctioned leave he went to his father- in- law's house where he fell ill . It is not expected that the concerned workman apprehending his ailment well ahead will take sick leave from the nianagement . The two postal receipts Ext . W - 3 and W - 3 / 1 shows that he took steps and due intimation was given to the management about his ailment . The medical prescription relating to lus treatment and medical certificate shows that actually he was lying ill and for which during the period in question he did not get scope to join his duties . Therefore, there is no acceptable ground to hold that the concerned workman had no sufficient reason for remaining himself absent from duty. Learned Advocate for the management in course ofhearing submitted that there was hospital of the management about 3 K. M. away from Katras where the residence of his father- in-law was situated. Disclosing this fact Ld. Advocate submitted that the concerned workman had the scope to get his treatment from the said hospital but he did not consider it necessary . I consider that it is absolutely the discretion of the workman where he likes to get his treatment . Therefore , as he did not take his treatment from the hospital of the managementgement there is no scope to draw conclusion that the concerned workman falsely took the plea of his ailment and intentionally remained hiinself absent unauthorisedly with a view to hamper the production . Concerned workman in support of his ailment not only relied on the postal receipts but also relied on the medical papers . Onus is on the management to establish that the concerned workman created all these papers falsely with a view to get rid of charge brought against him for

ין 9013 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 27 , 2004/अग्रण 6 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely :-

श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर, 2004

"Areas comprising the revenue villages of Bhojipura , Pipalsana Chawdhari , Pachdiyora Diyaharia , Vilva, Karampur Chawdhari , Kargaina , Bidarbhan Nagla and Abhaypur in Pargana, Tehsil and District of Bareilly. "

[F. No. S - 38013 / 85 /2004- SS. I ] का.आ. 3062.- राष्ट्रपति, श्री सरजू प्रसाद को दिनांक 27-10-2004 ( पूर्वाह्न ) से तीन वर्ष के लिए केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण-सह- श्रम न्यायालय Ⅰ, धनबाद के पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करते हैं ।

K. C. JAIN, Director

नई दिल्ली, 8 नवम्बर, 2004

[फा० सं ० ए-11016/ 11/2003 - सीएलएस- II ] पी. के. ताम्रकार, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , the 5th November, 2004

S. O. 3062. The President is pleased to appoint Sh. Sarju Prasad as Presiding Officer Central Government Industrial Tribunal - Cum- Labour Court - I , Dhanbad , w.e.f. 27-10-2004 (FN ) for a period of three years .

[F. No. A- 11016/ 11/2003 CLS- II ]

का.आ. 3064.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 1 दिसम्बर, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय 4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय 5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

P. K. TAMRAKAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 8 नवम्बर , 2004

" तिरुणलवेली जिला सेंको‌ट्टै तालुक के राजस्व ग्राम पिरानूर, इलातूर, वल्लम और उसके पुरवा कोट्टाकुलम के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र।"

[फा० सं० एस-38013/86/2004 - एस.एस . 1 ]

के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 8th November , 2004 का.आ. 3063. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 दिसम्बर, 2004 को उस . तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय 4. (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय 5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्: -

" जिला, तहसील एवं परगना बरेली के राजस्व ग्राम- भोजीपुरा, पीपलसाना चौधरी, पचदियोरा दियोहरिया, विलवा, करमपुर चौधरी, करगैना, विदारभान नगला एवं अभयपुर के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र । "

[फा० सं० एस-38013/ 85/ 2004 - एस.एस.- 1 ]

S. O. 3064. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st December, 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI [except Sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely

के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 8th November, 2004

"Areas comprising the revenue villages of Piranoor, Elathoor , Vallam and its Hamlet Kottakulam of Shenkottah Taluk in Tirunelveli District.."

[F. No. S - 38013 /86/2004 - SS . I ]

K. C. JAIN , Director

नई दिल्ली, 19 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3065.- केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट है कि लोकहित में ऐसा अपेक्षित है कि किसी भी तेल क्षेत्र में सेवाओं को जिसे S. O. 3063. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st December , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI [ except Sub -section (i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the 9014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 27 , 2004/AGRAHANA 6 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

New Delhi , the 19th November , 2004 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 17 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है , उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए ।

S. 0.3065 .- Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest required that the services in the any Oil Field which is covered by item 17 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , should be declared to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act.

अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप - खण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियोंका प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

1 [फा० सं० एस -11017/10/97- आई.आर. ( पी.एल. ) ]

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - clause (vi ) ofclause ( n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industry to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act for a period of six months .

[F. No. S- 11017/10/97 - IR(PL)] जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

J. P. PATI , Jt . Secy.

Printedby the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications . Delhi - 110054.