This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD. No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली, दिसम्बर 5 दिसम्बर 11 , 2004 , शनिवार/अग्रहायण , 14-अग्रहायण, 20. 1926

सं. 50 ]

NEW DELHI , DECEMBER 5 DECEMBER 11, 2004, SATURDAY / AGRAHAYANA, 14- AGRAHAYANA, 20 1926 No. 50

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3 -उप-खण्ड (11) PART II Section 3-Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DepartmentofEconomicAffairs) वित्त मंत्रालय ( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग )

(Banking Division)

(बैंकिंग प्रभाग )

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

S. O. 3116. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 ofthe Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949) the Central Government, on the recommendationof Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions ofSection 13 and 15 (1 ) of the said Act shall not apply, for aperiod of five years from the date ofthis Notification to DenaBank.

का.आ. 3116.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 (1949का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतद्वारा घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 और 15 ( 1 ) के उपबंध इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से पांच वर्ष तक देना बैंक पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।

[F. No. 11/26/2003 -BOA] [फा० सं० 11 /26/2003- बीओए ]

D.P. BHARDWAJ , Under Secy.

डी० पी ० भारद्वाज , अवर सचिव

(9285)

3530 GI/ 2004 9286

: THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

(राजस्व विभाग )

(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम्बर, 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 3117.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 (1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " रत्नागिरि जिला ब्रिज एसोसिएशन , रत्नागिरि " को कर- निर्धारण वर्ष 2002-2003 के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्-

( 1 ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(2 ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर - जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(3) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो किकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(4) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ।

(5 ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पत्तियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी। [अधिसूचना सं. 287/2004 फा. सं. 196/ 10/2003- आयकर नि. - 1 ]

दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव (Department of Revenue)

(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ) New Delhi , the 30th November, 2004 (INCOME TAX)

S. O. 3117.- In exercise of the powers conferred by the clause (23 ) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Ratnagiri Zilla Bridge Association , Ratnagiri " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment year 2002-2003 subject to the following conditions . namely: --

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (1) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained inthe form ofjewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section (5)ofSection 11;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income - tax Act, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 287/2004 F. No. 196/ 10/2003 - ITA - IJ DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.

(बीमा प्रभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 1 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3118.-जीवन बीमा निगम अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 31 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा निर्देश देती है कि भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबन्ध निदेशक श्री आर० एन ० भारद्वाज, प्रबन्ध निदेशक के रूप में अपने कार्यों के अतिरिक्त, तुरन्त प्रभाव से, 31 दिसम्बर 2004 या अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, निगम के अध्यक्ष का मौजूदा कार्यभार भी संभालेंगे और वे उस निगम के अध्यक्ष की सभी शक्तियों और कृत्यों का प्रयोग करेंगे ।

[फा. सं ० 14/11/2004- बीमा. 1V ] आर. रंगनाथ, निदेशक (Insurance Division)

New Delhi, the 1st December, 2004

S. Q. 3118. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 (31 of 1956) the Central Government hereby directs that Shri R.N. Bhardwaj , Managing Director of the Life Insurance Corporation of India will hold current charge of the Chairman of that Corporation with immediate effect, - upto 31st December, 2004 or till further orders , whichever is earlier, in addition to his duties as Managing Director, 9287 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अधिनियम की धारा 4 (3 ) (च) के तहत केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा नामित and he shall exercise all the powers and the functions of the Chairman of the said Corporation.

[F. No. 14/11/2004- Ins . IV] R. RENGANATH, Director

4. श्री कांता प्रसाद सिन्हा , आई.ए.एस. , रेशम उत्पादन निदेशक, पश्चिम बंगाल सरकार, कोलकाता

नई दिल्ली, 3 दिसम्बर , 2004

5. श्री शुभेन्दु चौधरी,

एम.एल.ए. , गांव-जोत, डाकघर आरापुर, जिला-मालदा, पश्चिम बंगाल

अधिनियम की धारा 4 (3 ) ( छ) केतहत केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा नामित

काआ 3119.-बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतद्वारा घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 और 15 ( 1 ) के उपबंध इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से पांच वर्ष तक सिंडिकेट बैंक पर लागू नहीं होंगे।

[फा० सं० 11 /18/2004- बीओए]

6. श्री रवि मित्तल, आई.ए. एस. , निदेशक, हथकरघा व रेशम उत्पादन, बिहार सरकार, पटना

राम मुईवा, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 3rd December, 2004

7. श्री प्रकाश एस. शाह , आई.ए.एस. , आयुक्त, कुटीर और ग्रामीण उद्योग , गुजरात सरकार, गांधीनगर

[फा. सं . 25012 /56/99 -रेशम ]

किरन धींगरा , संयुक्त सचिव

MINISTRY OF TEXTILES S. O. 3119.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949) the Central Government, on the recommendation of Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions ofSection 13 and 15 ( 1 ) of the said Act shall not apply, for a period of five years from the date of this Notification to SyndicateBank.

New Delhi , the 1st December, 2004 [F. No. 11 /18/2004 -BOA] RAM MUIVAH , Director

1 वस्त्रमंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 1 दिसम्बर, 2004

S. O. 3120.- In exercise of powers conferred by Sub-section (3 ) of Section 4 of the Central Silk Board Act , 1948 (61 of 1948) , the Central Government hereby notifies the nomination of the following persons to serve as members of the Central Silk Board for a period of three years from the date of this notification subject to the provisions of the said Act.

Nominated bythe Central

1. Shri B.K. Sinha,

Government under Section

4(3)(b) ofthe Act

DC (Handlooms ), Ministry of Textiles, NewDelhi.

का. आ. 3120.-केन्द्रीय रेशम बोर्ड अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 61 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा उपर्युक्त अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अध्यधीन इस अधिसूचना की तिथि से तीन वर्षों की अवधिके लिए केन्द्रीय रेशम बोर्ड के सदस्यों के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों का नामांकन अधिसूचित करती है ।

अधिनियम की धारा 4 ( 3 ) (ख) के तहत केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा नामित

1. श्री बी. के. सिन्हा, विकास आयुक्त ( हथकरघा ) , वस्त्रमंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली

2. Dr. H.Basker, Member Secretary, Central SilkBoard, Bangalore.

2. डॉ एच. बास्कर,

Nominated by the Central Government under Section 4 (3 ) (e) of the Act केन्द्रीय रेशम बोर्ड,

सदस्यसचिव, बेंगलूर

अधिनियम की धारा 4 (3 ) (ङ)

श्री ए. एलंगोवन ,

3. Shri A. Elangovan , IAS, Secretary, Handlooms, Handicrafts , Textiles and Khadi Department, Govt. ofTamil Nadu, Chennai.

के तहत केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा नामित

आई.ए.एस. , सचिव,

3. हथकरघा, हस्तशिल्प,

Nominated by the Central Government under Section

4. Shri Kanta Prasad Sinha , IAS,

वस्त्रऔर खादी विभाग ,

तमिलनाडु सरकार, चैन्नई 9288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA20, 1926

4(3) (f) of the Act Director of Sericulture, Govt. ofWest Bengal, Kolkata

5. Shri Subhendu Chowdhury, MLA, Village Jote, PO: Arapur Distt. Malda, West Bengal.

Nominatedby the Central Government under Section 4 (3 ) (g ) of the Act 6. Shri Ravi Mittal, IAS, Director, Handloom & Sericulture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna .

7. Shri Prakash S. Shah, IAS, Commissioner, Cottage andRural Industries, Govt . ofGujarat, Gandhinagar.

[F. No. 25012 /56 /99 - Silkj KIRAN DHINGRA, Jt. Secy.

युवा कार्यक्रम और खेल, मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 22 नवंबर, 2004

का. आ. 3121.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा राजभाषा ( संघ केशासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 1976 के नियम 10(4) के अनुसरण में, नेहरू युवा केन्द्र संगठन के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिसके कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है: -

क्र.सं. कार्यालय का नाम

राज्य

क्षेत्र 1

उत्तर प्रदेश

"क" 1. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र संगठन, मंडल कार्यालय, लखनऊ

2. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र, आगरा उत्तर प्रदेश

"क"

उत्तर प्रदेश

"क" 3. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र संगठन, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, आगरा

4. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र , लखनऊ उत्तर प्रदेश

" क" 5. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र, बाराबंकी उत्तर प्रदेश

" क" 6. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र, डिगलीपुर अण्डमान निकोबार " क"

पंजाब

7. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र, संगरूर

"ख" 8. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र, वायनाड केरल

"ח"

" "

केरल

9. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र, मल्लापुरम

10. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र, पाण्डिचेरी

"ח"

तमिलनाडू

11. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र, सम्बलपुर उड़ीसा

"ת" 12. नेहरू युवा केन्द्र, बालंगीर उड़ीसा

"ח"

[मि. संख्या ई. 11011/7/2004- हि.ए. ]

आर.एन. शर्मा, उप सचिव

[PART II-SBC. 3(ii)] MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2004 S. O. 3121.-In pursuance of rule 10(4) ofthe Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rule, 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices ofNehru Yuva Kendra Sangthan the Staff whereof have acquired working knowledge ofHindi :-

Sl . No. Office

State

Region

Uttar Pradesh "A" 1. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Sangthan, Regional Office, Lucknow

Uttar Pradesh "A" 2. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Agra

Uttar Pradesh "A" 3. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Regional Office, Agra

Uttar Pradesh "A" 4. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Lucknow

Uttar Pradesh " A " 5. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Barabanki

"A" 6. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Diglipur

Andman& Nicobar

Punjab

"B " 7. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Sangrur

Kerala

" C" 8. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Waynad

Kerala

"C" 9. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Mallapuram

Tamilnadu

"C" 10. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Pandicheri

Orissa

" C" 11. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Sambalpur

"C" 12. Nehru Yuva Kendra, Bolangir

Orissa

[F. No. E- 11011/7/2004-H.U. ] R.N. SHARMA , Dy. Secy.

विद्युत मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3122.- सार्वजनिक परिसर ( अनधिकृत अधिभोक्ताओं की बेदखली ) अधिनियम, 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केंद्र सरकार एतद्वारा विद्युत मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना सं.एस.ओ. 1257 दिनांक 27मार्च, 2002 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

कथित अधिसूचना की तालिका में क्रम सं. 6 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के लिए निम्नलिखित प्रतिष्ठापित किया जाएगा अर्थात् ।

नेशनल थर्मल पावर कारपोरेशन

6. श्री जी.एल. शर्मा, प्रबंधक (विधि),

कोलडैम जल विद्युत परियोजना,

नेशनल थर्मल पावर कारपोरेशन ।

लि. के अपने स्वामित्व वाले या उससे संबद्ध या पट्टे पर लिए गए और उसके कोलडैम जल विद्युत परियोजना, बेरमाना, जिला 9289 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20 , 1926

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(2) बिलासपुर, हिमाचल प्रदेश के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण वाले सभी परिसर ।

[एफ.सं. 8/6/1992- थर्मल -1 ] अरविन्दजाधव, संयुक्त सचिव

नोट: मूल अधिसूचना एस ओ सं. 1257 दिनांक 27 मार्च, 2002 के द्वारा दिनांक 13 अप्रैल , 2002 के भारत के राजपत्र के भाग -1। खण्ड 3, उपखण्ड ( ii ) में प्रकाशित हुई थी ।

पश्चिम बंगाल के मालदा जिले में बैष्णव नगर पुलिस स्टेशन के अंत- र्गत खेजूरियाघाट में फरक्का सुपर थर्मल पावर प्रोजेक्ट अथवा एनटीपीसी केस्वामित्व वाले/लीज़ पर लिए गए या किराये पर ली गई सभी भूमि, क्वार्टर, एस्टेट सम्पदा और अन्य कोई आवास ।

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004

S. O. 3122.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises ( Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants ) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Govemment ofIndia in the Ministry of Power number S.O. 1257 , dated the 27th March , 2002 , namely :-

पश्चिम बंगाल में राजधानी समेत. किसी भी अन्य स्थान में एनटीपीसी/ फरक्का सुपर थर्मल पावर प्रोजेक्ट के स्वामित्व वाले/लीज़ पर लिए गए या किराये पर ली गई सभी भूमि, क्वार्टर, एस्टेट सम्पदा और अन्य कोई आवास।

In the said notification in the Table , for serial number 6 and the entries relating thereto , the following shall be substituted , namely :-

[एफ सं . 8 /6/ 1992- थर्मल-1 ] अरविन्दजाधव, संयुक्त सचिव

नोट :- मूल अधिसूचना एसओ सं. 1590 दिनांक 08 जुलाई, 1993 के द्वारा दिनांक 13 अप्रैल , 2002 के भारत के राजपत्र के भाग -11 खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) में प्रकाशित हुई थी । 6. Shri G.L. Sharma, Manager (Law) , Koldam Hydro Power Project, National Thermal Power Corporation.

All premises owned or belong ing to or taken on lease by National Thermal Power Cor- poration Limited and under the administrative control of its Koldam Hydro Power Pro- ject, Bramana, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh .

[F. No. 8 /6/ 1992 -Th . 1 ] ARVIND JADHAV, Jt . Secy .

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 S. O. 3123.In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants ) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Power number S.O. 1590 , dated the 8th July, 1993 , namely:-

Note : The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Part II , Section 3 , Sub- section

( ii ) dated the 13th April , 2002 vide number

S.O. 1257 , dated the 27th March , 2002.

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2004

In the said notification in the Table , for serial number 2 and the entries relating thereto , the following shall be substituted , namely :-

(2)

(1 )

2. Shri B.K. Sharma,

का.आ. 3123.- सार्वजनिक परिसर ( अनधिकृत अधिभोक्ताओं की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केंद्र सरकार एतद्वारा विद्युत मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एस.ओ. 1590 दिनांक 08 जुलाई, 1993 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:

SeniorManager, (HumanResource ) , National Thermal PowerCorporation Farakka

कथित अधिसूचना की तालिका में क्रम सं. 2 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के लिए निम्नलिखित प्रतिष्ठापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्: -

(2)

(1)

2. श्री बी. के. शर्मा,

वरिष्ठ प्रबंधक

(मानव संसाधन) , नेशनल थर्मल पावर कारपोरेशन, फरक्का।

All lands , quarters , Estate Pro- perties and accommodation owned/ leased and rented by National Thermal Power Cor- poration Limited or Farakka Super Thermal Power Project in Farakka under the Farakka Police Station , District, Murshidabad, West Bengal . All lands, quarters, Estate Pro- perties and any other accommo- dations owned, leased or rented by National Thermal Power Corporation or Farakka Supper Thermal Power Project in Khejuriaghat under the Baishnabnagar Police Station District Malda , West Bengal .

पश्चिम बंगाल के मुर्शिदाबाद जिले मेंफरक्कापुलिस स्टेशन के अंतर्गत फरक्कामें फरक्का सुपर थर्मल पावर प्रोजेक्ट अथवा नेशनल थर्मल पावर कारपोरेशन लि. के स्वामित्व वाले/ लीज पर लिए गए और किराए पर ली गई सभी भूमि, क्वार्टर, एस्टेट सम्पदा औरआवास । 9290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

(2)

notifies the following Offices under the administrative control ofMinistry of Communications and Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications whereof more than 80% of staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi.

Chief General Manager, North Telecom Project Circle, New Delhi

All lands , quarters , Estate pro- perties and any other accom- modations , owned, leased or rented by National Thermal Power Corporation/Farakka SuperThermal Power Project in any other place including metro -polis in West Bengal .

1. General Manager, Satellite Communication Project , NewDelhi

[ F. No. 8/6/ 1992 -Th. 1]

ARVIND JADHAV, Jt . Secy.

2. Deputy General Manager, North Telecom Project, National Capital Region, New Delhi .

3. Deputy General Manager, North Telecom Project, Jaipur

Note :-- The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India , Part II , Section 3. Sub- section (ii) dated the 24th July, 1993 vide number S.O. 1590 , dated the 8th July, 2004 .

4. Deputy General Manager, North Telecom Project, Jodhpur

5. General Manager, North Telecom Project , Lucknow संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (दूरसंचार विभाग)

6. Deputy General Manager, North Telecom Project, Dehradun

( राजभाषा अनुभाग )

[No. Ε . - 11016/ 1/2004-O.L . ] नई दिल्ली, 25 नवंबर, 2004

HARISH CHANDRA JAYAL , Jt . Secy. नई दिल्ली, 30 नवंबर , 2004

का. आ. 3124.-केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 1976 ( यथा संशोधित 1987 ) के नियम 10(4 ) के अनुसरण में, संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय, दूर संचार विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करती है : -

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, उत्तरी दूरसंचार परियोजना परिमण्डल, नई दिल्ली

1. महाप्रबंधक, उपग्रह संचार परियोजना, नई दिल्ली

का. आ.3125.-केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 1976 ( यथा संशोधित 1987 ) के नियम 10(4) के अनुसरण में संचार और सूचना प्रौगिकी मंत्रालय , दूर संचार विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है : -

2. उप महाप्रबंधक, उत्तरी दूरसंचार परियोजना , राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र नई दिल्ली

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार, भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, आन्ध्र प्रदेश परिमण्डल , हैदराबाद

3. उप महाप्रबंधयः , उत्तरी दूरसंचार परियोजना,जयपुर

[सं. ई. - 11016/1 /2004 - रा.भा. ] 4. उप महाप्रबंधक, उत्तरी दूरसंचार परियोजना, जोधपुर

5. महाप्रबंधक, उत्तरी दूरसंचार परियोजना, लखनऊ

हरीश चन्द्र जयाल, संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi , the 30th November, 2004 6. उप महाप्रबंधक, उत्तरी दूरसंचार परियोजना, देहरादून

[सं. ई. - 11016/1 /2004 - रा . भा. ]

हरीश चन्द्र जयाल , संयुक्त सचिव

MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

(Department of Telecommunications)

S.O. 3125. In pursuance ofrule 10(4 ) ofthe Official Language (Use for official purposes of the Union ) , rules, 1976 ( as amended- 1987 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the following Office under the administrative control of Ministry of Communications and Information Technology , Department of Telecommunications whereof more than 80 % of staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi .

(Official Language)

New Delhi , the 25th November , 2004

Chief General Manager Telecom , BSNL , Andhra Pradesh Circle,Hyderabad

[No. E. - 11016/1/2004-O.L. ]

HARISH CHANDRA JAYAL , Jt. Secy.

S.O. 3124. In pursuance of rule 10 (4 ) of the Official Language ( Use for official purposes of the Union ) , rules , 1976 ( as amended- 1987 ) , the Central Government hereby 9291 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2004

का० आ ० 3126.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डिजिकन्ट्रोल्स नार्दर्न प्राइवेट लि. , बी-60, सेक्टर-5 , नोएडा, उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " डी जी टी " श्रृंखला केअंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार का) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डिजि आर्टस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 139 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्रजारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार का ) है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोटन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्तै, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिः कन्या गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान.अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1× 10 , 2×10 या 5× 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 18 ) /2004]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART 11-SBC. 3 (ii) ] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi, the 10th November, 2004

S.O. 3126. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below), is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " DGT " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II) and with brand name "DIGI' Arts" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Digicontrols Northern Pvt. Ltd. , B-60, Sec- tor- 5 , Noida , Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/ 139;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers , conferredby Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of Img . to 50mg. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2× 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 18)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 9293 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर , 2004

का० आ० 3127.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डिजिकन्ट्रोल्स नार्दर्न प्राइवेट लि. , बी-60, सेक्टर-5 , नोएडा, उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " डी जी पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डिजि आर्टस " है ( जिसे इसঙ্গ, इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 140 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2400 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द भी की किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के" ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5× 10 *, के हैं ,जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 18 )/2004]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3530 G1/ 2004-2 9294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1926

[PART: II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 10th November, 2004

S.O. 3127. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of " DGP " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "DIGI Arts" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Digicontrols Northern Pvt . Ltd. , B -60, Sector-5, Noida, Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/140;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 2400 kg and minimum capacity of 10kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg. and upto 5000 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 18)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 9295 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 3128.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानेक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डिजिकन्ट्रोल्स नार्दर्न प्राइवेट लि. , बी-60, सेक्टर-5 , नोएडा, उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डीजी टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार का ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डिजि आर्टस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 141 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा। स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 1000 तक कोरेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2×10 या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 18 ) /2004]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi, the 10th November, 2004

S.O. 3128.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ), is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " DGT " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III) and with brand name " DIGI' Arts " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Digicontrols Northern Pvt. Ltd. , B-60, Sec- tor- 5, Noida, Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/ 141;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weigh- ing result . The instruments operates on 230 Volts 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

6 Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k where is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 18)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 9297 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2004

का० आ ० 3129.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्तं मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डिजिकन्ट्रोल्स नार्दर्न प्राइवेट लि. , बी-60, सेक्टर -5 , नोएडा, उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डी जी पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डिजि आर्टस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्तमॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/142 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5× 10%, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा०सं० डब्ल्यू एम-21 (18 )/2004]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 10th November, 2004

S.O. 3129.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed. authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of "DGP " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class -III) and with brand name "DIGI' Arts " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Digicontrols Northern Pvt. Ltd. , B-60 , Sector - 5, Noida, Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/ 142;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 2000kg . and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacit above 50kg and upto 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manuactured.

[F: No. WM-21 ( 18)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 9299 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 3130.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री कामधेनु इलैक्ट्रानिक्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, 102 , शिवम काम्प्लेक्स, नाना बाजार, वल्लभ विद्या नगर-388120 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस ई -30 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " आकाशगंगा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/102 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

AKASHGANGA

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मानमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10%, 2×10 . या 5 × 10* के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 124)/2003 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 29th November, 2004

S.O. 3130.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

4 Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weigh- ing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " SE 30 " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III) and with brand name " Akashganga " (herein referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Shree Kamdhenu Elec- tronics Private Limited, 102 , Shivam Complex, Nana Bazar, Vallabh Vidya Nagar- 388 120 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/ 102;

ASHGANGA

The said model ( See the figure given above ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The liquid crystal display (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manuactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 124)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 9301 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 3131.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स गोयल इलैक्ट्रानिक्स, सुकेती रोड, काला अम्ब, जिला सिरमौर, हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जी डब्ल्यू एस" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , इलैक्ट्रानिक, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " अग्नि " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004/239 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटोप प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जायेगा ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1×10, 2×10* या 5× 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 160)/2004 ] पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3530 GI/ 2004-3 9302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi, the 29th November, 2004

S.O. 3131. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of "GWS " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III) and with brand name " AGNI " ( herein after referred to as the said model) , manufactured by 1.1/ s . Goyal Electronics , Suketi Road, Kala Amb, District Sirmour, Himanchal Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/239;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers, conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. to 2g. and with of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 160)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 9303 भारत क्रा राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड' 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 3132.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानेकर (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स गोयल इलैक्ट्रानिक्स, सुकेती रोड, काला अम्ब, जिला सिरमौर, हिमाचल प्रर्दश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जी डब्ल्यू एस" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, इलैक्ट्रानिक, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " अग्नि" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/240 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 250 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के "ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक तथा 500 कि.ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 , 2× 10 * या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 160 )/2004]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004

S.O. 3132. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

A Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weigh- ing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of " GWS " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " AGNI " (herein after referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s. Goyal Electronics, Suketi Road, Kala Amb , District Sirmour , Himachal Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/240;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 250 kg and minimum capacity of 1 Kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 50 g.. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 500 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 160)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 9305 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 1 दिसम्बर, 2004

का०आ० 3133.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एवरी इंडिया लिमिटेड, प्लाट संख्या 50-54 , सैक्टर 25 , बल्लबगढ़ -121004 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जे सी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित , तोलन उपकरण ( बहु भार सेल प्रकार तुला चौकी ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एवरी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 370 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित ( बहु भार सेल प्रकार तुला चौकी) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50,000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारितं आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द कीजाएगी ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो और 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 5 टन से ऊपर और 150 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 171 )/2002 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 1st December, 2004

S.O. 3133. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weigh- ing instrument (Multi load cell type weighbridge ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy ( Accuracy class III) of " JC" series with brand name " AVERY' (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Avery India Limited, Plot No. 50-54, Sector- 25, Ballabhgarh- 121004 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/370;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Multi load cell type weighbridge) with a maximum capacity of 50,000 Kg and minimum capacity of 200 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10 Kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Dis- play, (LCD) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonnes and up to 150 tonnes with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 Kg or more and with 'c ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 171 )/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 9307 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 1 दिसम्बर, 2004

का०आ० 3134.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स आरबिट कम्प्यूटर एंड टेलीकम्यूनिकेशन्स, 199 , पी एल शर्मा रोड, अपर इंडिया डेरी के सामने , मेरठ-250001 उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " टी डब्ल्यूआई " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित , तोलन उपकरण ( तुला चौकी के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ट्रिक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/391 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित संयोजित, उतोलक पद्धति के सिद्धांत पर कार्य करने वाला अस्वचालित ( तुला चौकी के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 4000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है.। सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मंशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो और 5 कि. ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 5 टन से ऊपर और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (43 )/2002 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II- SBC. 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 1st December, 2004

S.O. 3134. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the non-automatic weighing instrument (conversion Kit for Weighbridge) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of ' TWI ' series with brand name " TRIX" (herein referred to as the said Model ), manufacturedby M/s. Orbit Computer & Telecommunications, 199, P.L. Sharma Road , Opposite Upper India Dairy, Meerut- 250 001 U.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/391;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based working on the principle of compund lever system non- automatic weighing instrument ( conversion kit for weighbridege) with a maximum capacity of 40,000 kg. and minimum capacity 100 kg . The verification scale interval ' e ' is 5 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tarc effect. The light Emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (43)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 9309

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3135.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम, 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक (कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

क्रम संख्या

(2)

(1)

(4)

(3)

28अक्तूबर, 2004

3अक्तूबर, 2004

3466: 1988

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: सीईडी/गजट ] एस. दास गुप्ता , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उपमहानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-I ) ]

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2004

S. O. 3135. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule (1 ) of Rule (7) of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Sl. No. No. and year of the Indian Standards

(2)

(1)

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4)

(3)

28 October, 2004 3October, 2004

3466: 1988

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices:Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: CED/Gazette] S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F' Dy. Director General (Tech. -1)

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3136.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

क्रम संख्या

(2)

(1)

(4)

(3)

31अक्तूबर, 2004

संशोधन की संख्या 3 सितम्बर, 2004

आई एस 5207: 1969 1

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

3530 GI/ 2004-4

[संदर्भ: सी एच डी/जी एन ] एस. दास गुप्ता , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी - Ⅰ ) 9310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2004

S. O. 3136.-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 ofBureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

No. and year of the amendment

No. and year of the Indian Standards

Date from which the amendment shall have effect (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

IS5207: 1969

Amendment No. 3 , September 2004

31-10-2004 Copyto these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: CHD/GN]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General (Tech. -I)

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3137.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हों, की संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

आई एस 15520 : 2004

31 अक्तूबर, 2004 आई एस ओ 12040 : 1997 ग्राफिक प्रौद्योगिक- पेन्ट और मुद्रण स्याहियां फिल्टरित ज़ेनान आर्क प्रकाश प्रयुक्त करते हुए प्रकाश के प्रति पक्केपन का आकलन

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तपुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: सी एच डी/जी एन ]

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैन्यनिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1)

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2004

S. O. 3137. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule (1 ) of Rule 7 of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexcd have been established on the date indicated against each.

SCHEDULE

Sl .No.

Date of Established No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards , if any, Supersededby the New Indian Standards

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

31-10-2004 IS 15520 : 2004 ISO 12040 : 1997 9311 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(3)

(1)

Graphic Technology-Paints and Printing Inks -assessment of light fastness using filtered xenon arc light.

Copyto these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai andalso Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: CEHD/GN]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist 'F' Dy. Director General (Tech -1)

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3138.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि

स्थापित भारतीय मानक(कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदिकोई हों, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

सितम्बर 2004 1

आई एस 2596 : 2004 खनिकों की टोपी के लैम्पों के बल्ब ( लैम्प ) - विशिष्टि. (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण । )

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तपुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: ईटी 23 /टी-26 ]

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

NewDelhi, the 23rd November, 2004

S. 0.3138 .-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each.

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl. No. No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards, ifany, superseded by the New Indian Standards

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

September 2004 1 IS 2596: 2004 Bulbs (Lamps) forMiners ' Cap -Lamps --Specification

(SecondRevision)

Copyto this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau ofIndian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices :Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur,, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: ET 23/T-26]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist 'F ' Dy. Director General (Tech. -1) 9312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3139.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक(कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

सितम्बर 2004 आई एस 4696 ( भाग 3 ) : 2004मीट्रिक बट्रैस चूड़ियों के लिए आयाम- भाग 3 आधारभूत आयाम ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तपुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एमजीपी 20/आईएस 4696 ( भाग 3 ) : 2004 ]

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004

S. O. 3139.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) ofRule (7) ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each..

SCHEDULE

SI . No.

Date of Established No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards, if any, superseded by the New Indian Standards

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

September2004 IS4696 (Part 3) : 2004 Dimensions for metric buttress threads Part 3 Basic dimensions (SecondRevision)

Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MGP 20 /IS 4696 (Part 3 ): 2004]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General (Tech. -1)

नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3140.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम, 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

9313

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

क्रम संख्या

20. आईएस 13265 : 1991

04-09-2004

संशोधन सं. 2 दिसम्बर, 2003

21. आईएस 14490 : 1997

04-03-2004

संशोधन सं. 1 सितम्बर, 2003

22. आईएस 14929 : 2001

[संदर्भ: सीएमडी- IV/13 : 5 ] इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयोंः नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

बलवंत राय , उप महानिदेशक(मुहर)

New Delhi , the 30th November, 2004

S. O. 3140.-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the Amendment

SL No. and year of the Indian Standards

No.

(2)

(1)

Date from which the Amend- ment shall have effect

10. IS 3957 : 1966

30-09-2003

Amendment No. 2 November, 2003

11. IS6092S6092 (Part 1 ) : 1985

30-11-2003

Amendment No. 2 November, 2003

12. IS6260 : 1971

30-11-2003 Amendment No. 1 December , 2003

13. IS 7641 : 1975

31-12-2003 Amendment No. 1 December, 2003

14. IS 7661 : 1975

31-12-2003 15 IS 7686: 1975

Amendment No. 1 November, 2003

30-11-2003 Amendment No. 2 November, 2003

16. IS9754 : 1981

30-11-2003

17. IS 10458 : 1983

Amendment No. 3 November, 2003

30-11-2003

Amendment No. 1 November, 2003

18. IS 10500 : 1991

30-11-2003

19. IS 13264 : 1991

Amendment No. 2 September, 2003

30-09-2003

Amendment No. 1 September, 2003

20. IS 13265: 1991

30-09-2003

Amendment No. 1 September , 2003

21. IS 14490: 1997

30-09-2003

Amendment No. 2 December, 2003

22. IS 14929 : 2001

04-09-2004

Amendment No. 1 September, 2003

04-03-2004

Copy of these amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: CMD- IV/ 13 :5]

BALWANT RAI , Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3141.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

स्थापित तिथि

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

( 1 )

(2)

(3)

(4)

IS6200 : 1977

अगस्त 2004

1. IS 6200 (Part 2) : 2004 सार्थकता के लिए सांख्यिकीय परीक्षण भाग 2 X² परीक्षण ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

IS 10645 : 1998

अगस्त 2004

2. IS 10645: 2004 प्रकम योग्यता एवं प्रकम निष्पादन के आकलन की विधियाँ ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

3. IS 15446 (Part 1): 2004 उत्पादन नियंत्रण की मार्गदर्शिका भाग 1 भूमिका

सितम्बर 2004

अगस्त 2004

4. IS 15446 (Part 2): 2004 उत्पादन नियंत्रण की मार्गदर्शिका भाग 2 उत्पादन प्रोग्रामिंग

5. IS 15446 (Part 3 ): 2004 उत्पादन नियंत्रण की मार्गदर्शिका भाग 3 सामान्य पद्धति

जून 2004

अगस्त 2004

6. IS 15446 (Part 5): 2004 उत्पादन नियंत्रण की मार्गदर्शिका भाग 5 उत्पादन नियंत्रण तथा अन्य प्रबंध कार्यों के बीच संबंध 9315

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(2)

(1)

7. IS 15446 (Part 6): 2004 उत्पादन नियंत्रण की मार्गदर्शिका भाग 6 कम्पयूटर की सहायता से उत्पादन नियंत्रण

8. IS 15461 : 2004 100 पलंग वाले अस्पतालों के लिए अस्पताल सेवा में गुणता आश्वासन के लिए कार्यकारिता संबंधी मार्गदर्शिका

(4)

(3)

सितम्बर 2004

जुलाई 2004

[संदर्भ: एम एस डी/नोटिफिकेशन ] इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तपुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उपमहानिदेशक ( तकनीकी- I )

NewDelhi , the 30th November, 2004

S. O. 3141.-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) ofRule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

Sl. No. , Title & Year of the Indian No. Standards Established

SCHEDULE

Date ofEstablished

No.& Year of Indian Standards , ifany, Supersededby the New Indian Standard

August 2004

IS6200: 1977

1. IS 6200 (Part 2) : 2004 Statistical Tests of Significance Part 2 x² Tests (Second Revision)

2. IS 10645 : 2004 Methods for Estimation of Process Capability and Process Performance (Second Revision)

3. IS 15446 (Part 1) : 2004 Guide to Production ControlPart 1 : Introduction

4. IS 15446 (Part 2): 2004 Guide to Production Control Part 2:Production Programming 5. IS 15446 (Part 3): 2004 Guide to Production Control Part 3 : Ordering Methods 6. IS 15446 (Part 5) : 2004 Guide to Production Control Part 5 Relationship Between Production Control andOther Management Function 7. IS 15446 (Part 6) : 2004 Guide to Production Control Part 6 : Computer Aided Production Control

8. IS 15461 : 2004 Performance Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Hospital Services upto 100 -Bedded Hospitals

August 2004

IS 10645: 1998 .

September 2004

August 2004

June 2004

August 2004

September 2004

July2004

[Ref.MSD/Notification) Copyto this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices:Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

S.DAS GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General (Tech.-1) 9316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3142.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 6 के उपविनिबम (3 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गये उत्पादों की मुहरांकन शुल्क अधिसूचित करता है: -

अनुसूची

भाग अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद

इकाई

म्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क इकाई दर भारतीय मानक सं.

बडे पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

प्रचालन तिथि 3829 2 0 1985

1 स्टरलाइलर

24000

17000

86.4 भाप स्टरलाइज़र, दाब और उर्ध्व बेलनाकार नुमा

20020401 3830 0 0 1979

1 पानी का भभका

24000

17000

पाइरोजन- रहित आयुत जल के लिए पानी के भभके

86.4 20020401 3831 0 0 1979 उथले स्टरलाज़र (ड्रेसिंग ड्रम)

1 स्टरलाइलर

24000

17000

1.45 20020401 3832 0 0 1986 हस्तचालित चैन गिर्रियां ब्लॉक

1 चेन गिर्रियां ब्लॉक

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 3843 0 0 1995 पीछे इस्पात लगे फ्लैप कब्ज़े

100 अदद

26000

18000

0.6 20020401 3865 0 0 1993 बीयर

100 लिटर

17000

24000

7.2 20020401 3901 0 0 1975 जिराम डब्ल्यूडीपी

1 टन

24000

17000

28.8 20020401 3902 0 0 1975 डाइमिथोएट , तकनीकी

एक टन

29000

22000

144 20020401 3903 0 0 1984 डाइमिथोएट, ई सी

100 लिटर

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 3944 0 0 1982 फ्लो कप

1 अदद

27000

20000

2.9 20020401 3975 0 0 1986

1 टन

24000

17000

केबल के क्वचन के लिए मृदु इस्पात के तार , पत्तियाँ और टैप

8.65 20020401 3976 0 0 2003

1 जोड़ा

30000

24000

खान श्रमिकों के लिए रबड़- कैनवस केसुरक्षितजूते

0.35 20020401 3984 0 0 1967 दोहरे तान की आटे की थैलियाँ।

1 टन

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 3989 0 0 1984

1 टन

24000

17000

7.2

अपकेन्द्री ढले ( स्पन ) लोहे के स्पिगॉट और मलजल के पाइप

20020401 3993 0 0 1993 उपकरणों के लिए ट्रे

एक ट्रे

24000

17000

0.35 20020401 4003 1 01978 पाइप रिंच भाग । सामान्य प्रयोजन

1 अदद

36000

29000

0.3

20020401 4003 2 0 1986 पाइप रिंच ( भारी कार्य)

1 पाइप रिंच

24000

17000

4.35 20020401 4038 0 0 1986 जलकल प्रयोजनों के लिए फुट वॉल्व एक वॉल्व

24000

17000

1.45 20020401 4100 0 01988 जिन

100लिटर

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 9317 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

इकाई दर

इकाई

उत्पाद

बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

अनु

20020401

7.2

17000

भास्तीय भाग मानक सं.

24000

100 अवद

20020401. कड़ाहिर्यो

4.35 0 0 1967

17000

4109

24000

1 पाइप रिंच

चेन पाइप रिंच

0 1982

4123 0

20020401

41000

49000

100वर्ग मीटर

हॉस्पीटल रबड शीट

0 0 1974

4135

20020401

.17000

24000

0.45

एकडिस्कस

20020401 डिस्कस

1.45 0 1967

17000

4142

24000

100 जोड़ा

20020401

0.35 शल्यक्रिया के लिए रबड़ के दस्ताने

24000

01989

4148 0

30000

1 अदद

20020401

0.35 संरक्षी हेल्मेट

18000

0 1993

4151 0

26000

एकवर्गमीटर

20020401

36 टाइपराइटर के लिए रिबन , सूती

17000

4174

01977

24000

एककिलो लिटर

20020401

2.9 द्रव साबुन

20000

0 1990

4199 0

27000

1 चूल्हा

0.2002

4246

20020401

2.9 द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैसों के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू गैस चूल्हा

20000

27000

1 अदद

0 1980

4250

20020401

7.2

17000

बिजली के खाद्य मिक्सर , खाद्य द्रवन करने और पीसने की युक्तियाँ

24000

1 टन

0 0 2001

4270

20020401

1.45 पानी के कुओं में उपयोग के लिए इस्पात की नलियाँ

17000

24000

1 अदद

20020401

0.15 गर्म हवा केपंखे

17000

01981

4283

24000

1कि.ग्रा.

0 0 2003

4308

अग्निशमन के लिए शुष्क पाउडर फायरक्लास बी और सी

20020401

201.6 .

22000

29000

1 टन

20020401

7.2

17000

थिरम , तकनीकी

0 0 1982

24000

4320

1 टन

20020401

28.8 एन्डोसल्फान , डीपी

22000

0 01967

4322

29000

100लिटर

20020401

2.9 एन्डोसल्फान , ईसी

17000

0 01980

24000

4323

1 सूक्ष्मदर्शी यंत्र

20020401

144

22000

29000

एक नेत्रिका वाली सूक्ष्यदवशी विछेदन हेतु

4328

0 1967

1 टन

20020401

57.6

तकनीकी

एन्डोसल्फान ,

24000

0 01978

30000

4344

1टन

20020401

0.06

14000

दरवाजों के लिए इस्पात के फ्रेम

0 1976

20000

4351 0

1 वर्गमीटर

20020401

1.45

1,7000

आग रोधी प्रैटिस कपड़ा

24000

0 0 1977

4355

1 चकती

1 01985

20020401 4366

7.2

17000

कृषिजुताई की चकतियाँ, भाग 1 अवतलनुमा

24000

1 सूक्ष्मदर्शी

20020401

8.65

17000

रोगाणु विज्ञान के लिए सूक्ष्मदर्शी

24000

01967

4381

1000 ब्लेंदस

20020401

0.3

17000

अरंजित नेत्र चिकित्सा के ग्लास ब्लैक्स

24000

01967

4382

1 अदद

20020401

21.6

17000

पुटिंग शॉट्स

24000

0 0 1988

4386

1 टन

0 1981

4396

विस्फोटक और आतिशबाजी संघटन केलिए बेरियम नाइट्रेट

3530 GI/2004-5 9318

भाग

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 20, 1926

अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद

भारतीय मानक सं.

4447 0

0 1995 सोडियम बेंजोएट खाद्य ग्रेड 4448

01994 बेंजोडक अम्ल, खाद्य ग्रेड

1 टन

4449 0 01988 व्हिस्की

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii )] इकाई

न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क

इकाई दर बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

तिथि

1 कि.ग्रा.

24000

17000

0.15

20020401 30000

24000

86.4

20020401

100लिटर

4450 0 01988 ब्रॉण्डी

24000

17000

7.2

20020401

100लिटर

4467 0 0 1996 कैरामल सादा

एककि.ग्रा.

4521 0 01977

एक टन

तेल कूपों और कूपों में ड्रिलिंग में प्रयुक्ततार रस्से

4533

0 1995 चूषण उपकरण

1 उपकरण

4588

0 0 1986 कच्चा प्राकृतिक रवड़

1 टन 4615 0 0 1968

100 अदद

स्विच सॉकेट आउटलेट (नॉन इंटरलॉकिग टाइप )

4665

2 0 1984 सुवाह्य विजली की मोटर चालित औजार 24000

17000

7.2

20020401 24000

17000

0.15

20020401 36000

29000

86.4

20020401 24000

17000

8.65

20020401 24000

17000

21.6

20020401 24000

17000

2.9

20020401

एक औजार

4704 0 0 1985 सिल्वर टिन दन्त अमालगम मिश्रधातु 1 कि.ग्रा.

4717 0 0 1980 जिंक ऑक्साइड स्व-आसंजक प्लास्टर 49000

38000

4.35

20020401 24000

17000

14.4

20020401

100 वर्ग मीटर

4723 0 0 1978 अंडा पाउडर

1 कि.ग्रा.

4752 0 0 1994

1 कि.ग्रा.

सोडियम मेटावार्डसल्फाइट खाद्य ग्रेड

4766

0 0 1982 थिरम डब्ल्यूडी पी

1 टन 4783 0 0 1982 थिरम वीज- उपचार निर्मित्तियाँ

एक टन 4832

1 0 1969

1 टन

रसायन प्रतिर ग्धी मोर्टार (सिलिकॉन टाइप)

4832

2 0.1969

एक टन

रसायन प्रतिर ग्धी मोटार ( रेजिन टाइप )

4832 3 0 1968

एक टन

रसायन प्रतिरोधी मोटार ( सल्फर टाइप )

4923 0 0 1997

1 टन

संरचनात्मक उपयोग के लिए खोखले इस्पात सेक्शन

4927

0 01992

24000

17000

5.8

20020401 24000

17000

0.6

20020401 24000- 15 17000

0.15

20020401 24000

17000

28.8

20020401 24000

17000

57.6

20020401 29000

22000

28.8

20020401 29000

22000

28.8

20020401 29000

22000

28.8

20020401 24000

17000

7.2

20020401

100मीटर

अग्निशमन के लिए विना अस्तर वाले फ्लेक्स केनवस के होज

4929

0 0 1978 डाइक्लोरवॉस , तकनीकी

एक टन 4947 0 0 1985

1 काट्रिज

अग्निशामकों में उपयोग के लिए गैस काट्रिज

4956 0 0 1977

एक टन

आंद्योगिक प्रयोजनों के लिए संश्लिष्ट डिटरजेंट

4964 0 0 1991 सादी वुनी हुई सूती वनियानें

100वनियानें 24000

17000

11.55

20020401 29000

22000

144 20020401 24000

17000

1.45

20020401 49000

41000

7.2

20020401 24000

17000

4.35

20020401 9319 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

इकाई दर

इकाई

उत्पाद

भाग अनु वर्ष

प्रचालन तिथि

न्यूततम म्हरांकन शुल्क बडे पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

भारतीय मालक सं.

20020401

26000

33000

एक टन

4984

0 1995 पेयजल पूर्ति, जल - मल और औद्योगिक बहिः स्त्राव के लिए भारी कार्य के पॉलिईथाइनीन पाइप

72 20020401

35000

42000

1 टन

4985 0 0 2000 पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए आसुघटय पीवीसी पाइप

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

1 लिटर

1 0 1985

4989

अग्नि शमन के लिए झाग यौगिक (प्रोटीन झाग )

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

1लिटर

2 0 1984

4989

अग्नि शमन के लिए यांत्रिक झाग उत्पन्न करने के लिए झाग सांद्र भाग 2 जलीय फिल्म रूपण झाग (एएफएफएफ)

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

1लिटर

0 1987

4989

अग्नि शमन के लिए यांत्रिक झाग उत्पन्न करने के लिए झाग सांद्र (यौगिक) भाग 3 फ्लूरो प्रोटीन झाग

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

एक वर्गमीटर

कंक्रीट शटरिंग कार्य के लिए प्लाईवुड

0 0 1993

4990

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

एकनिर्जर्मक

निर्जर्मक उपकरण (टेबल मॉडल)

01989

5022

20020401

14.4

41000

49000

1बेड स्टेड

बेड स्टेड, अस्पताल , सामान्य प्रयोजन

5029 0 01979

20020401

0.22

17000

24000

एक अदद

सजावटी, प्रकाश व्यवस्था के ऑडरकिट

0 0 1969

5077

20020401

8.65

17000

24000

1000शीट

स्टेंसिल पेपर

0 1993

5086

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

100 अदद

5101

0 1991 टिवस्ट ड्रिल, समानान्तर शैन्क जॉबर श्रृंखला

20020401

7.2

17000

24000

100 अदद

ट्विस्ट ड्रिल, मार्स टेपर शैन्क

5103

0 1969

20020401

2.9

17000

24000

1 डस्टर

हस्त घूर्णी डस्टर (बेली माउंटेड टाइप)

5135

0 1994

20020401

2.9

17000

24000

एक डस्टर

हस्त घूर्णी डस्टर (सोल्डर माउंटेड टाइप)

5135

0 1994

20020401

0.35

22000

29000

एक अदद

5143

0 1988 समंजनीय सहायक घूमने के लिए बैसाखियाँ

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

एकतापन पैड

घरेलू उपयोग के लिए तापन पैड

5161 0 01969

20020401

17000

24000

1 टन

0 0 1992

5175

पॉली प्रोपाइलीन रस्सियाँ (3 -लड़ ) होजरलेड और 8 - लड़ गुधी हुई

20020401

0.35

17000

24000

1किग्रा.

सोडियम एल्जीनेट खाद्यं ग्रेड

0 1993

5191 0

20020401

14.4

35000

42000

सुरक्षित जमा लॉकर केबिनेट

5244

0 1991

एक सुरक्षित जमा

लॉकर केबिनेट

28.8 20020401

22000

29000

100 लिटर

डाइक्लोरबॉस ई सी

0 1978

5277

20020401

240

29000

36000

1 टन

डिकोफोल , तकनीकी

01969

5278

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

100 लिटर

डिकोफोल , ई सी

01969

5279 9320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद

इकाई

इकाई, वर भारतीय भाग मानक सं.

न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

प्रचालन तिथि 5281 0 01979 फेनीट्राथियॉन, ई सी

100 लिटर

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 5290 0 01993 आन्तरिक नलको के लिए लैन्डिंग वाल्व

1 बाल्य

26000

18000

2.9 20020401 5291 0 0 1969 शल्य क्रिया मेज, द्रवचालित, बड़ी

एक मेज

24000

17000

86.4 20020401 5312 1 0 1984 झूलने वाले रोक टाइप रिफ्लैकस वॉल्व

1 वाल्व

30000

24000

2.9 20020401 5312 2 0 1986

1 वाल्व

49000

41000

144 20020401 घरेलू प्रयोजनों केलिए झूलने वाले टाइप रिफ्लैकस वॉल्व

5342 0 01996 एस्कोर्बिक अम्ल, खाद्य ग्रेड

एककि.ग्रा.

24000

17000

0.35 20020401 5348 0 0 1981 स्टेपल

36000

29000

2.4 20020401

100 पॉकेट (1000 स्टेपलो वाला)

5380 0 0 1976 सोडियम ब्रोमाइड फोटोग्राफीय श्रेणी 1 कि.ग्रा..

24000

17000

0.15 20020401 5410 0 0 1992 सीमेंट रंग -रोगन यथा अपेक्षित

100कि.ग्रा.

33000

26000

7.2 20020401 5423 0 0 1989

1 अदद

36000

29000

0.15 20020401 स्वचल निलग्जन के लिए टेलीस्कोपिक टाइप द्रवीय शॉक एबज़ोवर

5424 0 01969

1मेट

विद्युत प्रयोजन के लिए रबड़ मैट

24000

17000

4.35 20020401 5456 0 0 1985 वायु- संपीडक

1 संपीडक

30000

24000

21.6 20020401 5470 0 0 2002

एक टन

डाई -कैल्शियम फस्फेट- पशु आहार ग्रेड

29000

22000

14.4 20020401 5485 0 0 1980 कॉटन यार्न (सूती तंतु अपशिष्ट)

एक टन

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 5487 0 01992 धातु पालिश, तरल

एककिलो लिटर

24000

17000

43.2 20020401 5509 0 0 1980 अग्नि अवमंदक प्लाईवुड

एक वर्ग मीटर

36000

29000

0.15 20020401 5531 0 0 1988

1 टन

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 ऐस्बेस्टॉस सीमेंट दाब पाइपों के लिए ढलवां लोहा स्पेशल

5557 0 0 1995

1 जोड़ा

24000

17000

0.3 20020401 औद्योगिक तथा सुरक्षा , रबड़ के जूते घुटनों तकके

5604 0 0 1984

1 मशीन

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 साविक गियररहित हस्त चालित खींचने तथा उठाने वाली मशीने

5672 0 0 1992

1 टन

24000

17000

11,55 20020401 पूरक कुक्कुट आहार के लिए खनिज मिश्रण

5676 0 0 1995 संचकित ठोस रबड़ के तल्ले तथा एड़ी 100जोड़े

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 5679 0 0 1986 खान श्रमिकों के लिए टोपी पर लगाए

1 अदद

24000

17000

0.45 20020401 जाने वाले लैम्प

5695 0 0 1970 चश्मे के लेंस

100 चरमे के लेंस

30000

24000

7.2 20020401 5719 0 01970 जिलेटिन , खाद्य ग्रेड

1 कि.ग्रा.

24000

17000

0.15 20020401 9321 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

इकाई दर

उत्पाव

भाग

प्रचालन तिथि अनु वर्ष

न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

भारतीय मानक सं.

20020401

0.22

22000

29000

एकलिटर

हिमन रोधी शीतक

01994

5759

20020401

14.4

17000

24000

1 उपकरण

5780 0 0 1980 निजतया निरापद विद्युत-उपकरण तथा सर्किट

20020401

3.6

17000

24000

100जोड़े

0 0 1996

5852

फुटवियर के लिए संरक्षी इस्पात की पंजाटोपी

20020401

0.75

17000

24000

1 वर्ग मीटर

5884

गुच्छेदार ऊनी कालीन

0 1993

20020401

28.8

26000

33000

100मीटर

रेगमार के लिए रबड़ होज़

0. 0 1980

5894

20020401

0.35

20000

27000

100मीटर

शॉट फायरिंग केबल

0 1984

5950 0

20020401

86.4

17000

24000

1 टन

सूती बेल्टिंग डक्स

5996

0 1984

8.65 20020401

17000

24000

1 टन

0 0 1983

6003

पूर्व प्रतिबलित कंक्रीट के लिए दाँतेदार तार

20020401

17.3

29000

36000

एक टन

0 01983

6006

पूर्व प्रतिबलित कंक्रीट के लिए अलेपित प्रतिबल मुक्तलड़

20020401

1.1

17000

24000

1 कि.ग्रा.

फास्ट ग्रीन एफसीएफ, खाद्य ग्रेड

0 0 1994

6022

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

1कि.ग्रा.

कैलशियम प्रोपिबोनेट, खाद्य ग्रेड

6031

01971

20020401

0.75

17000

24000

1 कि.ग्रा.

एल्जीनेट दन्त छाप सााग्री

0 1987

6036

20020401

0.75

17000

24000

1 कि.ग्रा.

जिंक ऑक्साइड- यूजिनोल दंत छाप पेस्ट

6037

0 1970

20020401

21.6

17000

24000

एक टन

अभिमार्जन पाउडर

0 1970

6047

20020401

2.9

48000

57000

1000 अदद

0 1986

6071

सीसा-अम्ल बैटरियों के लिए संश्लेषित बैटरी सेपरेटर

20020401

2.9

17000

24000

10वर्गमीटर

0 0 1971

6073

फर्श और छत बनाने के लिए ऑटोक्लेव प्रबलित सेल्युलर कंक्रीट

20020401

86.4

17000

24000

एक टेबल

आपरेशन टेबल, द्रव चालित , माइनर

0 01971

6106

20020401

0.75

17000

24000

1 टन

सोडा एश , फ्यूज्डतकनीकी

6135

0 1981

0.75 20020401

17000

24000

1 टन

सोडियम कार्बोनेट (मोनोहाइड्रेट)

6155

0' 1987

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

100 लिटर

फॉसफोमिडौन डब्ल्यूएस सी

6177

0 1981

20020401

3.6

17000

24000

100जोड़े

मड गार्ड

0 1971

6218 0

20020401

2.9

17000

24000

1 वर्ग मीटर

धातु के रोलिंग शटर एवं रोलिंग ग्रिल

6248

0 1979

20020401

21.6

20000

27000

एककिलो लिटर

0 1994

8312

सामान के परिवहन के लिए पॉलिथाइलीन धारक

20020401

4.35

17000

24000

1 अदद

भारी दरवाजों के लिए फ्लोर स्प्रिंग

0 0 1992

6315

20020401

0.35

17000

24000

1कि.ग्रा.

सैकरीन , खाद्य ग्रेड

0 1978

8385 0 9322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद

इकाई

न्यूततम मुहरांकम शुल्क

भारतीय भाग मानक सं.

इकाई दर

बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

प्रचालन तिथि 6392 0 01971 इस्पात पाइप फ्लैंज

1 अदद

24000

17000

1.45 6406

20020401 0 01994 चमकीला नीला, एफ सी एफ, खाद्य ग्रेड 1 कि.ग्रा.

24000

17000

1.1 20020401 6438 0 0 1980 एल्यूमीनियम फॉस्फाइड निमित्तियाँ

1 टन

29000

22000

57.6 6444 0

20020401 01979 सल्फर भुरकन पाउडर

1 टन

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 6446 0 0 1986 अभ्रक रोधित तापन एलीमेंट

100 अदद

30000

24000

2.9

6471 0

20020401 01971 स्पेक्ट्रामीटर (विद्यार्थियों के लिए)

1 अदद

36000

29000

6593 0

24 20020401 01972 इलैक्ट्रिक सिरोलोजिकल वॉटर बाथ

एक अदद

27000

20000

21.6

6595 1

20020401 0 1993

1 पम्प

27000

20000

4.35 20020401 कृषि प्रयोजनों के लिए स्वच्छ ठन्डे, ताजे पानी के लिए क्षैतिज अपकेन्द्री पम्प

6639 0 0 1972 इस्पात संरचना के लिए षटकोणीय काबले

1 टन

27000

20000

21.6 20020401 6701 0 0 1985

100लैम्प

टंगस्टन फिलामेंट अन्य विद्युत लैम्प

36000

29000

0.9 20020401 6750 0 01985 अन्तर्दाही इंजन के लिए सिलिंडर अस्तर

एक अदद

27000

20000

0.22 20020401 6793 0 0 1996 फ्यूमेरिक अम्ल, खाद्य ग्रेड

1 कि.ग्रा.

24000

17000

0.15 20020401 6887 0 0 1986 डेन्चर आधारित पॉलीमर रेज़िन

1 कि.ग्रा.

20000

14000

0.75 20020401 6901 0 0 1988

1 अदद

24000

17000

2.9 20020401 वेल्डिंग , कटिंग तथा संबंधित प्रक्रियाओं में प्रयुक्त गैस सिलिंडरों के लिए दाब रेग्यूलेटर

6937 0 0 1997 शिरोपरि प्रोजेक्टर

1 अदद

49000

41000-

7.2 20020401 6994 1 0 1973 औद्योगिक सुरक्षा दस्ताने

100जोड़े

20000

14000

7.2 20020401 7079 0 0 1995 स्वचल द्रवचालित ब्रेक होज़

100 अदद

36000

29000

7.2 20020401 7092 1 0 1992

1 टन

29000

22000

72 20020401 सिंचाई प्रयोजनों के लिए एल्युमीनियम मिश्रधातु की नलियाँ ( वेल्डित नलियों)

7092 2 0 1987

1 टन

29000

22000

72 20020401 सिंचाई प्रयोजनों के लिए एल्युमीनियम मिश्रधातु की नलियाँ ( बहिर्वेधित नलियाँ )

7098 1 0 1988

100 मीटर

33000

26000

3.6 20020401 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए क्रॉस लिंक वाले पॉलीइथाइलीन विद्युतरोधी पीवीसी ढके हुए केबल

7098 2 0 1985 एक्स एल पी ई केबल (3.3-33 कि. वाट) 100 मीटर

33000

26000

14.4 20020401 7121 0 0 1973 कारबराइल डब्ल्यूडी पी

1 टन

24000

17000

28.8 20020401 7123 0 0 1993 बालो के लिए तेल

100लिटर

24000

17000

2.9 20020401 7173 0 0 1989 खॉचदार पैन-हैड-टेपिंग स्क्रू

एककि.ग्रा.

36000

29000

0.35 20020401 9323 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भार्ग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

इकाई दर

इकाई

उत्पाद

भाग

तिथि वर्ष

अनु

म्यूततम महरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

भारतीय मानक सं.

20020401

5.8

20000

27000

100मीटर

0 0 1994

7193

काँध रेशे से बने कोलतार पिच तथाबिटुमन नमदे

20020401

0.75

20000

27000

1 टंकियाँ

0 1984

7231

प्लास्टिक की धावन टंकियाँ (वाल्वरहित साइफन नुमा)

20020401

288

17000

24000

एक टन

2,4- डी इथाइल इस्टर, तकनीकी

0 01991

7233

8.65 20020401

84000

120000

1सिलिंडर

0 1988

7285

स्थायी तथा उच्च दाब द्रवीय गैसों के लिए जोड़ रहित मैग्नीज़ इस्पात सिलिंडर

20020401

8.65

84000

120000

1सिलिंडर

0 0 1993

7312

वेल्डित अल्प कार्बन इस्पात घुलित एसिटिलीन गैस सिलिंडर

20020401

14.4

26000

33000

1 टन

0 1992

7328

संचकन तथा बहिर्वेधन के लिए उच्च तन्यता पॉलिईथाइलीन सामग्री

20020401

1.8

29000

36000

1 इंजन

7347

0 1974 कृषि कार्यो में छिड़काव और ऐसे की उपयोगों के लिए छोटे साइज़ की स्पार्क प्रज्वलन इंजनों की कार्यकारिता

20020401

1.45

18000

26000

1000 ब्लेड

स्टेनलेस स्टील के सेफ्टी रेज़र ब्लेड

0 1982

7371

20020401

0.75

22000

29000

1 अदद

0 1995

7372

मोटर वाहनों के लिए सीसा- अम्ल संचायक वैटरियाँ

0.3 20020401

17000

24000

एक फिल्टर

पेयजल के लिए फिल्टर

7402

0 1986

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

100बोरे

0 1984

7406

उर्वरकों की पैकिंग के लिए परतदार जूटके बोरे

20020401

11.55

17000

24000

1 टन

7452

0 1990 दरवाजों , खिडकियों तथा संवातन केलिए तप्त वेल्लित इस्पात खंड

20020401

4.35

18000

26000

1कुर्सी

7454 0 0 1991 पहिएदार कुर्सी मुड़ने वाली , हटाए जासकने वाले हैंडल तथा पायदान

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

100 गास्केट

प्रेशर कुकरों के लिए रखड़ के गास्केट

7466

0.1994

20020401

2.4

17000

24000

1 अदद

गैस परीक्षण ज्वाला-सुरक्षा लैम्प

7577 0 0 1986

20020401

7.2

17000

24000

1 अदद

खानों के लिए घर्षण टेक

0 1975

7586 0

20020401

5.8

26000

33000

एकस्प्रेयर

7593 1 0 1986 पावर चालित हवाभरे स्प्रेयर एवं डस्टर भाग 1 नैपसेक टाइप

20020401

216

35000

42000

एकमशीन

चिकित्सा विद्युत उपस्कर निदान एक्स-रे

7620

0 1986

उपकरण भाग ! यांत्रिक तथाविद्युत सुरक्षा अपेक्षाएं

20020401

2.9

17000

24000

1मीटर

स्फाइगोमैनोमीटर एनरॉयड टाइप

0 1988

7652 0 9324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ) भाग अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद

इकाई

न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क इकाई दर मानक सं. भारतीय

पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

प्रचालन तिथि 7653 0 0 1975

1अदद

24000

17000

1.45 वेल्डिंग तथा कटिंग के लिए मैनुअल ब्लोपाइप

20020401 7834

1 0 1987

100 अदद

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 जल पूर्ति के लिए विलायकसीमेंट जोड़ो के साथ अन्तःक्षेपण संचकित पीवीसी पाइप

7903 0 0 1995

100 वर्ग मीटर

24000

17000

5.8 उच्च घनत्व पॉलीइथाइलीन बुने कपड़े सेबने तिरपाल

20020401 7913 0 01975 आद्यात वेधन का समेकन स्टैम

1 समेकन स्टैम

24000

17000

1.45 20020401 7933 0 0 1975

1कि.ग्र.

24000

17000

0.45 20020401 घरेलू प्रयोजनों के लिए लचकीले पॉलीयूरीथेनफोम

7948 0 0 1987 फेन्थियन पायसनीय सांद्र

100लिटर

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 7976 0 01976 फोरेट , तकनीकी

एक टन

29000

22000

144 20020401 8025 0 0 1990 मोनोक्रोटोफॉस तकनीकी

एक टन

29000

22000

288 20020401 8028 0 0 1987 क्विनालफॉस , ई सी

100लिटर

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 8029 0 0 1985

1 टन

क्विनालफॉस , भुरनक चूर्ण

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 8034 0 0 1989

एक पम्पसेट

27000

20000

14.4 20020401 स्वच्छ ठंडे ताजे पानी के लिए निमज्जय पम्पसेट

8035 0 0 1976 उथले कुएँ के हथबरमे

1 पम्प

:: 24000 ,

17000

1.45 20020401 8072 0 0 1984 क्विनालफॉस , तकनीकी

एक टन

29000

22000

144 20020401 8074 0 0 1990 मोनोक्रोटोफॉस डब्ल्यूएस सी

100लिटर

29000

22000

28.8

20020401 8144 0 0 1997 बहुद्देशीय शुष्क बैटरियाँ

1000 अदद

27000

20000

1.45 20020401 8187 0 0 1976 डी-टाइप फ्यूज ( केवलफ्यूज लिंक) 100फ्यूज

41000

34000

3.6

20020401 8187 0 0 1976

41000

34000

3.6

20020401 डी-टाइप फ्यूज (फ्यूज आधार तथा कैरियर समुच्चय)

100 एकपोल

फ्यूज बेस

8255 0 0 1976

एककि.ग्रा.

33000

26000

0.75 20020401 वाहनों के लिए नम्य, भार- वहन करने वाले पॉलीयूरीथीन फोम यौगिक

8259 0 0 1976 ऑक्सीडीमेटॉन- मिथाइल , ई सी

100लिटर

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 8268 0 0 1986 राइजोबियम टीके

1 कि.ग्रा.

27000

20000

0.15 20020401 8275 0 0 1976 सूक्ष्मदर्शी यंत्र के लिए आईपीस

1 अदद

24000

17000

4.35 20020401 0

8309

0 1993

एक टन

24000

17000

288 20020401 विद्युतरोधी केबलों के ऐल्युमीनियम चालक के लिए संपीडन टाइप नलिकाकार टमिनल सिरे 9325 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 20,1926

भाग

वर्ष

उत्पाद

इकाई

न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क

अनु

इकाई दर प्रचालन तिथि

बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

भहतीय मानक सं.

24000

0.3 20020401 8311

100 अदद

17000

उपकरण ज्यूबेल

01976

72000

60000

14.4 20020401 0

8329

0 2000

एक टन

जल , गैस तथा मलजल के लिए अपकेन्द्री ढलवाँ (स्पन) तन्य लोहे के दाब पाइप कीविशिष्टि

57000

144

20020401

1 मी.टन

48000

8360 0 0 1977 पेयजल की आपूर्ति के लिए रचित एचडीपीई फिटिंगे

8421

29000

22000

21.6 20020401

1 धुनी

द्रवचालित धुनियों

0 1977

17000

24000

11.55 20020401

100मीटर

8423 0 01994 अग्नि शमन के लिए नियंत्रित परकोलेटिंग होज़

17000

24000

1.45 20020401

1 अदद

8427

01989 धान की भूसी अलग करने की मशीन के लिए रबड़ रोल

29000

21.6 20020401

1 मॉनीटर

36000

8442 0 01977 अग्नि शमन के लिए स्टैंड पोस्ट टाइप जल मॉनीटर

22000

288 20020401

1 टन

29000

8445 0

कारबेन्डाजिम (एम बी सी) , तकनीकी

0 1991

17000

20020401

1.45

1 अदद

24000

0 0 1989

8448

स्वचल लाइन बोल्टता करेक्टर (घरेलू उपयोग के लिए स्टेप टाइप)

42000

35000

21.8 20020401

एकस्ट्रेलाईजर

8462

01977 स्ट्रेलाईजर, सुवाह्य उर्ध्वाधर दाब टाइप

2.4 20020401

35000

1 पम्प

42000

8472

पम्प- पुनर्योजी स्वच्छ ठंडे पानी के लिए

01998

28.8 20020401

22000

29000

100 लिटर

फोसालोन , ई सी

8467 0 0 1977

72 20020401

22000

29000

एक टन

फोसालोन , तकनीकी

8488

0 1977

28.8 20020401

22000

29000

100 लिटर

टेमफॉस , ई सी

0 1977

8498 0

20020401

26000

0.22

33000

एकपिस्टन

8503

0 1986 आई. सी. इंजनों के लिए एल्युमीनियम मिश्रधातु केपिस्टन

20020401

1.45

35000

42000

1 सेट

8522

रासायनिक कारतूसनुमा श्वसित्र

0 1977

4.35 20020401

17000

24000

एकपूरा सेट

8523

श्वसित्र, कनिस्तर टाइप ( गैस- मास्क)

0 1977

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

एककि.ग्रा.

फर्श की पॉलिश , पेस्ट

0 1993

8541 0

20020401

7.2

17000

24000

एक आइडलर

8598

0 1987 पट्टा वाहकों के लिए आइडलर औरआइडलर सेट

28.8 20020401

17000

24000

एक टन

मैनकोज़ेब जल परिक्षपणीय चूर्ण सांद्र

8708

01978

20020401

0.35

17000

24000

1 वाल्व

0 1995

8737 0

नये निर्मित एल मी जी सिलिंडरों के लिए वाल्व फिटिंगें

20020401

1.45

18000

26000

1 गोबर गैस स्टोव

गोबर गैस स्टोव

0 2002

8749 0

3530 GI/ 2004-6 9326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1926

भाग अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद

भारतीय मानक सं.

8776 0 0 1988 5- लिटर तक की जल क्षमता वाले एल पी जी सिलिंडरों की वाल्व फिटिंगें 8783 4 3 1995 निमज्जनै मोटरों के वांइडिंग तार भाग 4- अलग-अलग तारों की विशिष्टि खंड 3 - पॉलिएस्टर और पॉलिप्रोपाइलीन वाइंडिंग तार

8828 0 0 1996 1000 वो. से कम की वोल्टता के लघु एअर- ब्रेक परिपथ वियोजक 8887 0 0 1995 सड़कों के लिए विट्मेन पायस (केश्यिोनटाइप)

8931

0 1993 ढलवा ताँबा मिश्रधातु की सजावटी विव टोंटियाँा तथा रोक टोटिंयाँ

8934 0 0 1978 जल सेवाओं के लिए ढलवा ताँवा मिश्रित सजावटी पिल्लर टॉटियों

8944

0 1978 क्लोरपाइरिफॉस , ई सी

8959 0 01978 फ्जूक्लोरेलिन , ई सी

8962 0 0 1978 क्लोरमिक्यूट क्लोराइड जलीय घोल 8963 0 0 1978 क्लोरपाइरिफॉस , तकनीकी

9020 0 0 2002 पावर थ्रेशर, सुरक्षा अपेक्षाएं 9031 0 0 1992 टेलीप्रिन्टर पेपर पेज रोल्स

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] इकाई

इकाई दर

न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमानेपर

एक वाल्व

24000

17000

0.35 20020401

100मीटर

42000

35000

3.6 20020401

1 अदद

57000

48000

0.22 20020401

एक टन

72000

50000

7.2 20020401

1-अदद

24000

17000

0.3 20020401

1 अदद

24000

17000

0.3 20020401

100लिटर

29000

22000

28.8 20020401

100लिटर

29000

22000

28.8 20020401

100लिटर

29000

22000

57.6 20020401

एक टन

29000

22000

172.8 20020401

1 थ्रेशर

24000

17000

21.6 20020401

100 रोल्स

9079 0 0 1989 कृषि प्रयोजनों के लिए स्वच्छ, ठंडे , ताजे पानी के लिए मोनोसेट पम्प

9103 0 01979 कंक्रीट के लिए अधि मिश्रण

9121 0 0 1979

1 गेज

गैस सिलिंडरों के वाल्व चेकिंग टाइप (साइज 2 ) टेपर चूड़ियों के लिए निरीक्षण गेज, 16 में एक टेपर 0

9128

0 1999 भारी कार्य के लिए शुष्क बेरियाँ 9138 0 0 1979 एजोटोबैक्टर क्रोकोकम टीके

1 कि.ग्रा.

9165 2 0 1992

49000

38000

7.2 20020401

1 मोनोसेट पम्प

27000

20000

7.2 20020401

1 किलोलिटर /एकटन 49000

38000

43.2 20020401 24000

17000

14.4 20020401

1000 अदद

27000

20000

1.45 20020401 27000

20000

0.15 20020401 57000

1000 सुईयाँ

टांका लगाने वाली सुईयाँ भाग 2 आईड नीडल साडज आकार और आयाम

9282 0 0 2002

एक टन

निलंबन के लिए तार की रस्सियों और लड़े

9294 0 0 1979

एक टन

रेजर ब्लेडों के लिए अतप्त वेल्लित स्टैनलेस इस्पात की पत्तियाँ

9295 0 0 1983

एक टन

खाँचदार वाहक पट्टी के लिए आडडलरों

48000

36 20020401 29000

22000

72 20020401 20000

000

20020401 24000

17000

7.2 20020401 9327

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

इकाई

उत्पाद

भाग अनु वर्ष

भारतीय मामक सं.

1 पम्प

गहराई से पानी निकालने के हथबरमे 0 0 1990

9301

एकवाल्य 0

9338

0 1984 ढ़लवा लोहे के पेंच रोक वाल्व तथा चैक वाल्य

100 लिटर

एलक्लोर ई सी

0 0 1980

9354

एक टन

ब्यूटाक्लोर तकनीकी

9355

0 1980

100 लिटर 0

ब्यूटाक्लोर, ई सी

9356

0 1980

100 लिटर

ट्राइऐलेट , ई सी

9358 0 0 1980

एक टन

फारेट दाने कैपसूल में बंद

9359 0 0 1995

1 टन

कारबोफ्यूरेन दाने कैपसूल में बंद

9360 0 0 1980

1 टन

ब्यूटाक्लोर दाने

9362 0 0 1980

एक टन

लिंडेन दाने

0 1980

9370

एक टन 1

9396

01987 खाद्य तथा ड्रिंकस्टिन प्लेट के लिए गोल खुले टाप के सेनिटरी

एक उपकरण

9459

0 1980 कठोर सीमेंट पेस्ट, मोर्टार तथा कंक्रीट कीलम्बाई परिवर्तन के मापन में प्रयुक्त उपकरण

100 अदद

फिल्टर टाप विविक्ट द्रव्य रेस्पिरेटर 0 1980

9473

एक टन

चक्का और श्रीखंड

0 0 1980

9532

100मीटर 4

9537

0 1983 विद्युत संस्थापनों के लिए विद्युतरोधी सामग्री की अनम्य स्वतः रिकवरिंग नलिकाकाद तार- नलियाँ

एक हेलमेट

पुलिस फोर्स के लिए अधात्विक हेलमेट 0 0 1980

9562

1 अदद 0 1980

9563 0

कार्बन मोनोक्साइड फिल्टर सेल्फ रेस्क्यूअर

100लिटर

ट्राइडीमोर्फ पायसनीय सान्द्र

0 1980

9656 0

100 लिटर

परपाम्थ्सर , ई सी

0 1981

9665

एक अदद

9758 0 0 1981 शौचालयों और मूत्रालयों के लिए सपाट वाल्व

100 अदद

0 01994

9762

फ्लोट वाल्व के लिए पॉलीड्याइलीन फ्लोट (गोलाकार) पॉलीइथाइलीन फ्लोट

1 अदद 1 0 1994

9815

सर्वो मोटर चालित लाइन वोल्टता केरेक्टर

1000गोलियाँ

क्लोरीन गोलियाँ

0 0 2003

9825

एक अदद

एक्सप्लोडर

01981

9836 0

इकाई दर प्रचालन तिथि न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

20020401

4.35

22000

29000

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

57.6

22000

29000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

22000

29000

20020401

22000

29000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

22000

29000

20020401

2.9

22000

29000

20020401

14.4

35000

42000

20020401

14.4

29000

36000

20020401

14.4

17000

24000

20020401

4.35

41000

49000

20020401

0.35

17000

24000

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

2.9

26000

33000

20020401

2.9

22000

29000

20020401

21.6

17000

24000

20020401

0.6

17000

24000

20020401

6.5

60000

72000 9328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004(AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-S&C. 3( ii)] भाग अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद

इकाई

इंकाई दर भारतीय मानक सं.

म्यूतलम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

प्रचालन तिथि 9857 0 0 1990

100मीटर

33000

26000

वेल्डिंग परिपथ में प्रयुक्त एक कोर की नम्यतारें

3.6 20020401 9937 0 0 1981 सुवाह्य मिथेनोमीटर (विद्युत टाइप)

1 अदद

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 9968 1 0 1988

100मीटर

27000

20000

0.35 20020401 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए इलास्टोमर विद्युतरोधी तार

9968 2 0 2002

100मीटर

33000

26000

14.4 20020401 3.3 कि वो से1100 वोल्ट तर्क की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए इलास्टोमर विद्युतरोधीतार

9971 0 01981 लेक्टिक अम्ल, खाद्य ग्रेड

एकमीट्रिक टन

36000

29000

288 20020401 9974 1 0 1981 एच पी एस बी लेम्प

एकलैम्प

72000

60000

1.45 20020401 10027

0 0 1981

एकस्विच

36000

29000

0.75

20020401 650 वो ए सी तक की वोल्टता के लिए वायुवियोजकस्विचों की संयुक्त यूनिट तथा पुनः तार जोड़ने वालेफ्यूज़

10080

0 0 1982

एक अदद

29000

22000

1.1 20020401 ढलाई मानक सीमेंट के मोर्टार घन (केवल घन साँचे ) के लिए कंपन मशीन

10086 0 0 1982

एकअदद

29000

22000

1.45 20020401 सीमेंट तथा कंक्रीट के परीक्षण में प्रयुक्तसाँचे

10119 C 0 1982

100लिटर

24000

17000

7.2

स्थल पर प्रयुक्त होने वाले तैयार कीटनाशी

20020401 10204 0 0 2001 सुवाह्य अग्निशामक यांत्रिक फोम वाले एक अग्निशामक

24000

17000

1.45 20020401 10212 1 0 1986

100 वक्सें

24000

17000

2.9 20020401 व्यावसायिक उच्च विस्फोटकों के लिए रेशों के नालीदार वक्सें

10243 0 0 1993 2,4- डी डांडल डस्टर , र्ड सी

100लिटर

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 10319 0 0 1982 इथीयॉन , र्ड सी

100लिटर

27000

20000

28.8 20020401 10322 5 1 1985

एकफिटिंग

30000

24000

1.45 20020401 स्थिर- सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए लेम्पपुंज

10322 5 2 1985 झिरीदार लैम्प पुंज

एकअदद

36000

29000

2.9 20020401 10322 5 3 1987

एक अदद

30000

24000

2.9 20020401 मार्ग तथा सड़क पर प्रकाश व्यवस्था के लिए लैम्प पुंज उपकरण

10322 5 51987 फ्लड लाइट

एक अदद

30000

24000

2.9 20020401 .

10350 0 0 1993 पाउडर हेयर डाई

एककि.ग्रा.

24000

17000

1.1 20020401 10369 0 0 1982 डथीयॉन तकनीकी

एक टन

29000

22000

288 20020401 10577 0 0 1982 लॉस कर्तन पाइप

1 टन

24000

17000

21.6 20020401 10592 0 0 1982

1 अदद

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 औद्योगिक आपातकालीन फव्वारे आई एवं फेस फव्वारे तथा सम्मिलित इकाईयाँ 9329

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11, 2004/ अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

उत्पाद

अनु

भारतीय भाग मालक सं.

10617

0 1983 वायुरूद्ध संपीडक उच्च तापमान अनुप्रयोगसमूह

10617

0 1983 वायुरूद्ध संपीडक मध्यम तापमान अनुप्रयोगसमूह

निम्न तापमान अनुप्रयोग समूह 10617

0 1983

वनस्पति

0 1999

10633 0

व्हील वियरिंग यीज

0 1983

10647 0

इकाई दर

इकाई

प्रचलन लिथि न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

1 संपीडक

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

1 संपीडक

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

एकसंपीडक

20020401

17.3

34000

41000

1 टन

20020401

43.2

17000

24000

एक टन

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

एक अग्निशामक

0 1999

10658 0

उच्च क्षमता के शुष्क पाउडर अग्निशामक ( ट्रॉली आरोपित) 01982

10665 0

खनिकों के लिए घुटने तक के रबड़ के सुरक्षाजूते

10733

0 1983 विद्युतबद्ध मार्ग और रेल के रबड केटैंकर होज़

10758

0 1983 गंध रहित किए गए (डियोडाइराजिंग) एवंरोगाणु नाशी तरल

0 0 1984

10775

शरीर पर धारण किए जाने वाले हियरिंगएड

0 0 1986

10805

कृषि प्रयोजनों के लिए अपकेन्द्री पम्पोंके फुट वाल्व

01994

10840

वनस्पति के लिए ब्लो संचकित एचडीपीई कंटेनर

1 01984

10891

रस्सियों के हवाई मार्गों के लिए इस्पात की तार रस्सियाँ- बुलाई रस्से 10908 0 0 1991 द्रवित पैट्रोलियम गैस के लिए नम्य रबड़ की ट्यूब

जिरम सी एस

0 1984

11010

बिजली के पंखों के लिए रेग्यूलेटर 0 01984

11037

संचकित रबड़कृत कॉयर कुशनिंग 0 01984

11060

11087

0 1986 चुम्बकीय स्याही अक्षर पहचान चैक प्रिंटिंग के लिए कागज

वोल्ट (स्ट्रॉग रूम) दरवाजा 1 01991

11188

0 1985

11225

खानों तथा इस्पात संयंत्रों में काम करने वाली महिला कामगारों के लिए चमड़े के सुरक्षा जूते

0 0 1993

11226

सीधे संचकित तले के साथ चमड़े के सुरक्षाजूते

20020401

0.3

24000

30000

1 जोड़ा

20020401

21.6

22000

29000

100मीटर

20020401

7.2

24000

30000

100 लिटर

20020401

1.45

24000

30000

एक अवद

20020401

0.75

17000

24000

1 फुट वाल्व

20020401

2.9

20000

27000

100कंटेनर

20020401

57.6

34000

41000

एक टन

3.6 20020401

22000

29000

100मीटर

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

100लिटर

20020401

1.45

22000

29000

एकरेग्यूलेटर

20020401

17000

24000

एक टन

20020401

17000

24000

1 टन

20020401

240

29000

36000

1 दरवाजा

20020401

0.75

29000

36000

एकजोड़ीजूते

20020401

0.45

20000

27000

एकजोड़ी 9330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1926

अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद भारतीय भाग मानक सं.

11246 0 0 1969 काँच रेशा प्रबलित पॉलिएस्टर रेजिन (जीआरपी) स्क्वेल्टिंग पिन $1248 0 0 1995 वर्दियों के लिए पॉलिएस्टर मिश्रित सूट काकपड़ा

11352 0 0 1994 खाद्य तेलों तथा वनस्पति की पैकिंग केलिए नम्यपैक

11480 0 0 1985 एल पी जी के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू ग्रिलर 11536 0 0 1997 प्रसंस्करित अनाज आधारित दूध छुड़ाने के खाद्य पदार्थ

11722

0 1986 पतली दीवार के नम्य शीघ्र युग्मन पाइप 11784 0 0 1986 कारबराइल बी एच सी (गामा) दाने 11785 0 01986 कैप्टन डब्ल्यूपी

11879 0 0 1986 बिजली के भाप कुकर

11913 0 0 1986 टरट ब्यूटाहाइड्रोक्विनॉन टी बी एचक्यू

11928

0 1987 सामान्य सेवा हेतु मानव निर्मित धागे वेन बंडल भाग 1 : सामान्य अपेक्षाएँ 11996 0 0 1987 डेल्टामेथरिन ई सी

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] इकाई

इकाई दर म्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमानेपर

प्रचालन तिथि 1 स्क्वेटिंग पैन

29000

22000

0.6 20020401 100 वर्ग मीटर

24000

17000

8.4 20020401

1000 थैलियाँ

24000

17000

2.9 20020401 एकग्रिलर

30000

24000

7.2 20020401

एक टन

72000

60000

144 20020401

एक टन

24000

17000

21.6 20020401

एक टन

36000

29000

86.4 20020401

एक टन

24000

17000

28.8 20020401

एकअदद

49000

41000

2.2 20020401

1कि ग्रा.

49000

41000

1.2

20020401

एकअदद

49000

41000

20020401

100लिटर

11997 0 0 1987 फेनवेलरेट ई सी

29000

22000

28.8 20020401

100लिटर

12003 0 0 1987 फेनवेलरेट तकनीकी

12004 0 0 1987 आइसोप्रोटयूरॉन तकनीकी

12015 0 0 1987 साइपरमेथ्रीन तकनीकी

12016 0 0 1987 साइपरमेथ्रीन ई सी

29000

22000

28.8 20020401

एक टन

29000

22000

288 20020401

एक टन

29000

22000

20020401

100कि ग्रा.

29000

22000

144 20020401

100लिटर

12109 0 0 1987 औद्योगिक उपयोगों के लिए हल्के कार्य के लिए सिलाई मशीनों के शीर्ष की सामान्य अपेक्षाएँ

12225 0 0 1997 जेट अपकेन्द्री पम्प संयोजन

12231 ว 0 1987 कृषि पम्पों की चूषण एवं निकास नालियों मे प्रयुक्त अप्लास्टिकृत पी वी सी पाइप 1

12232

0 1996

29000

22000

57.6 20020401

एक अदद

33000

26000

2.2 20020401

एक पम्प

27000

20000

7.2 20020401

एककिग्रा.

36000

29000

0.07 20020401 29000

एकछिड़काव यंत्र

घूर्णी छिड़काव यंत्र डिजाइन और चालन की अपेक्षाएं 12234 0 0 1986 ठंडे पानी कार्य के लिए प्लास्टिक संतुलन फ्लोटवाल्व

12236 0 0 1987

22000

1.45 20020401

एक वाल्व

24000

17000

0.45 20020401

100 रोल्स

जोड़ मशीन/ केल्कुलेटरों के लिए कागज के पेज रोल

49000

38000

4.8 20020401 9331 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

इकाई दर प्रचालन तिथि

इकाई

उत्पाद

न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

वर्ष

भाग अनु

20020401

57.6

29000

भारतीय मानक सं.

36000

एक टन

0 0 1988

12299

20020401

0.75 मीठा किया हुआ आंशिक मलाईरहित दूध पाउडर

35000

42000

1 वाल्व

0 1988

12300

20020401 छोटे प्रेआन सिलिंडरों के लिए वाल्वफिटिंग

1.15

17000

24000

एक प्रसारक

20020401 हस्तचालित उर्वरक प्रसारक

72 0 1988

34000

12337

41000

एक टन

षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले सम्प्रेषण टावर काबले

0 2001

12427 0

20020401

1.8

72000

96000

एक अदद

2 0 1988

12449

20020401 प्रवर्तन युक्तियाँ ( दीप्ति स्टार्टर के अतिरिक्त) भाग 2 कार्यकारी अपेक्षाएं

17.3

29000

42000

एक अदद

20020401 मारजरिन

120 0 1988

12451

48000

57000

एककिलोलिटर

20020401 अवरोधित खनिज रोधन तेल

6.5 0 1988

22000

12463

29000

100 मीटर

01988

12492 0

20020401

1.45 संपीडित वायु के लिए तापस्थापी होज़ (वस्त्रादि प्रबलित)

84000

120000

एकसिलिंडर

0 1988

12586

8.65 20020401 13 लिटर से कम की क्षमता के अल्प वेल्ड कार्बन इस्पात के गैस सिलिंडर

29000

36000

एक टन

0 0 2002

12592

पूर्व दलित कंक्रीट के मेनहोल ढक्कनऔर फ्रेम

20020401

1.45

20000

27000

एककिवा

0 1989

12615

4.35 20020401 प्रेरण मोटर ऊर्जा दक्ष 3 फेजी स्क्विरलकेज

84000

96000

एक अदव

1 0 2000

12640

घरेलू एवं समान प्रयोजन के लिए अवशिष्ट करंट चालित सर्किट वियोजक भाग । समेकित अतिधारा संरक्षण रहित सर्किटनियोजक

4.35 20020401

84000

96000

एक अदद

2 0 2001

12640

20020401

14.4 घरेलू एवं समान प्रयोजन के लिए अवशिष्ट करंट चालित सर्किट वियोजक भाग 1 समेकित अतिधारा संरक्षण सहित सर्किटनियोजक

22000

29000

1 मीटरी टन

0 0 1989

12650

20020401

0.9 खाद्यान्न की पैकिंग के लिए जूट के बोरे, 50 किग्रा

48000

64000

100 लिटर क्षमता

0 01996

12701

20020401

0.07 धूर्णी संचकित पॉलीइथाइलीनके जल भंडारण टैंक

22000

29000

एककिग्रा.

0 01994

12709

20020401

28.8 जल पूर्ति और मलजल के उपयोग के केलिए कौंच तंतु के प्रबलित प्लास्टिक केपाइप

22000

29000

100लिटर

20020401

50.4 पैन्डीमिथेलिन ई सी

22000

01989

29000

12751

100 लिटर

20020401.

4.35 थायोबैन्कार्य ई सी

22000

0 1989

29000

12769

एकफिल्टर

20020401

0.06 छानक टाइप फिल्टर

22000

0 1994

12785

29000

एककिग्रा..

सिंचाई उपस्कर -पॉलिइथाइलीन पाइप

0 0 1989

12786 9332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद

इकाई

इकाई दर भारतीय भाग मानक सं.

म्भूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बडे पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

12817 0 0 1997 स्टेनलेस स्टील, टक्करदार कब्जे

100 अदद

29000

22000

1.75 20020401 12818 0 0 1992

एक टन

36000

29000

72 20020401 बोरिंग / गहराई से पानी निकालने के कुओ के लिए अप्लास्टिकृत यूपीवीसीस्क्रीन औरकेसिंगपाइप

12823 0 0 1990 पूर्व परतदार पार्टिकल बोड

1 वर्ग मीटर

57000

48000

0.22 20020401 12873 0 0 1990 कॉपर ऑक्सीक्लोराइड ओ पी

एक टन

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 12912 0 0 1990 ब्रोमेडियोलान आर बी 0.005%

एक टन

29000

22000

374,4 20020401 12913 0 0 1990 ब्रोमेडियोलान सी बी

एक टन

29000

22000

374.4 20020401 12915 0 01990 एसीफेट, तकनीकी

एक टन

49000

41000

48 20020401 0

12916

0 1990 एसीफेट, एस पी

एक टन

29000

22000

1080 20020401 0

12931

01990 अट्राजिन डब्ल्यूपी

100किग्रा.

29000

22000

36 20020401 12933 1 0 1992 चपटी प्लेट का सोलर संग्राहक

33000

26000

8.65 20020401

आवरण प्लेट का एक वर्ग मीटर

12933 2 0 1992

1 वर्ग मीटर

49000

41000

1.45 20020401 चपटी प्लेट का सोलर संग्राहक के लिए अवशोषक के लिए शीट

13021 1 0 1991

एक अदव

42000

35000

2.2 20020401 नलिकाकार प्रतिदीप्ति बत्ती के लिए एसी पूर्ति वाले इलैक्ट्रॉनिक बालास्ट भाग 1 सामान्य और सुरक्षा अपेक्षाएँ

13021 2 01991

एकअदद

57000

48000

2.2 20020401 नलिकाकार प्रतिदीप्ति बत्ती के लिए एसी पूर्ति वाले इलेक्ट्रॉनिक बालास्ट भाग 2 कार्यकारी अपेक्षाएँ

13049 0 0 1991

1 वाल्व

36000

29000

1.1 20020401 अतप्त जल सेवा के लिए डायाफ्राम किस्म (प्लास्टिक ढाँचा) फ्लाट प्रचालित वाल्व

13056 0 0 1994

एक हथबरमा

29000

22000

4.35 20020401 गहराई से पानी निकालने का हथबरमा (वीएलओएम)

13095 0 0 1991

1 वाल्व

30000

24000

28.8 20020401 सामान्य प्रयोजन के लिए बटरफ्लाई वाल्व

13114 0 0 1991

1 वाल्व

42000

35000

0.5 20020401 जलकल प्रयोजन के लिए गढ़ाई वाले ताँबा मिश्रधातु के गेट, ग्लोब, रोक वाल्व

13138 0 0 1991

एक टन

29000

22000

43.2 20020401 अल्फा नैफथाइल एसीटिक एसिड 4.5 एसएल

13186 0 0 1991 सीट्रिक एसिड, खाद्य ग्रेड

1 टन

42000

35000

12 20020401 13209 0 0 1991 न मिटने वाली स्याही

एकलिटर

29000

22000

5.8 20020401 13287 0 01992

एक पम्प

29000

22000

4.35 20020401 अतिरिक्त गहराई से पानी निकालने के हथबरमे 9333 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

इकाई वर

इकाई

उत्पाद

भाग अनु

न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

भारतीय मानक सं.

20020401

288

41000

49000

एक टन

कीटनाशक- मेट्रीब्युजीन डब्ल्यूपी

13333 0 01992

20020401

28.8

29000

36000

एक टन

13334

0 1992 मखनिया दूध पाउडर भाग 2 अतिरिक्त ग्रेड

20020401

41000

49000

एक एल्टरनेटर

13364

0 1992 व्युत्क्रमणीय , आन्तरिक दहन इंजन द्वारा चालित एसी जेनरेटर भाग 1 20 केवीए तक रेटिंग एल्टरनेटर

20020401

48000

57000

1 अदद

0 0 1992

13385

अग्निशामक 50 लिटर क्षमता वाले पहिए पर लवे हुए पानी वाले गैस काट्रिज टाइप

20020401

48000

57000

1 अदद

0 0 1992

13386

अग्निशामक 50 लिटर क्षमता वाले यान्त्रिक झाग टाइप

20020401

1.45

29000

36000

100जोडे दस्ताने

0 1992

13422

उपयोग के बाद फेकने वाले रबड़ के शल्य क्रिया दस्ताने

20020401

2.4

35000

42000

एलीथ्रिन मच्छरनाशी कुंडली

13438

01992

5 डबल कॉयल वाले

100 बक्से

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

30 मैट का एक बक्सा

एलीथ्रिन मच्छर भगाने वाली मेट

0 0 1992

13439

20020401

936

29000

36000

एक मीटरी टन

डेल्टामेथ्रीन डब्ल्यूपी

0 0 1992

13457

20020401

3.6

17000

24000

100 अदद

विद्युत मशीनों के बुश

13466

0 1992

20020401

7.2

35000

42000

1000 उत्सर्जक

सिंचाई उपस्कर-उत्सर्जन गम

01992

13487

20020401

3.25

41000

49000

100 मीटर

01992

13488 0

सिंचाई उपस्कर- उत्सर्जन पाइप तंत्र

20020401

0.3

22000

29000

1 कि.ग्रा.

विद्युत मशीनरी हेतु बुश सामग्री

13584

0 1993

20020401

41000

49000

100कि.ग्रा.

0 1992

13592

संबातन और वर्षा जल तंत्र के साथ भवन केअन्दर निर्मित मल और अपशिष्ट निकासी तंत्र के लिए यूपीवीसी पाडप

20020401

4.35

41000

49000

100 अदद

13703

1 1993 अधिकृत व्यक्तियों द्वारा प्रयुक्त 1000 बोल्ट एसी और 1500 वो. डीसीफ्यूज़ों के लिए निम्न वोल्टताफ्यूज

20020401

57.6

20000

27000

1 टन

13730

0 1993 कुण्डलन तारे (भाग 1 से 34) केवल पहले लाइसेंस के लिए न्यूनतम मुहरांकंन शुल्क देय, परवर्ती लाइसेंस पर केवल इकाई दर देय

20020401

1.1

145000

165000

एकमीटर

01999

13779 0

ए सी स्थैतिक वाट घंटा मीटर वर्ग 1 और 2

20020401

1.45

22000

29000

एक कि.ग्रा.

डोडाइन डब्ल्यूपी

13785

0 1993

3530 GI/2004--7 9334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

अनु वर्ष

उत्पाद भरतीय भाग मानक सं.

13790 0 0 1993 कीटाजिन ई सी 48%

13801 0 0 1993 चकोर सीमेंट कंक्रीट टाइले 0

13849

0 1993 सुवाह्य अग्निशामक , शुष्क पाडउर किस्म, भंडारित दाब

13947 2 0 1993 निम्न वोल्टता स्विचगियर और नियंत्रण गियर भाग 2 सर्किट वियोजक 13947 3 0 1993 निम्न बोल्टता स्विचगियर और नियंत्रणगियर

13947 4 1 1993 निम्न वोल्टता स्विचगियर और नियंत्रणगियर भाग 4 इलेक्ट्रोमैकेनिक संपर्क यंत्र औरमोटर स्टार्टर

13947 5 1 1993 निम्न बोल्टता स्विचगियर और नियंत्रणगियर भाग 5 नियंत्रण (सर्किट) उपकरण और स्विचन अवयव अनुभाग 1 विद्युत यांत्रिक नियंत्रण सकिट

13983 0 0 1994 घरेलू प्रयोजनों के लिए स्टेनलेस इस्पात कीकिचन सिंक

13997 0 0 1994 ड्रम , बड़ा खुला सिरा

14151 1 0 1994

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] इकाई

इकाई दर न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर छोटे पैमाने पर

प्रचालन तिथि 100लिटर

29000

22000

172.8 20020401 10एम 2

36000

29000

2.9 20020401 1 अग्निशामक

-42000

35000

0.75 20020401 1 नम्बर

42000

35000

5.8 20020401 1 अदद

42000

35000

0.75 20020401 एक अदद

42000

35000

0.22 20020401 एक अदद

42000

35000

0.35 20020401 1 सिंक

36000

29000

0.75 20020401 1 ड्रम,

42000

35000

0.75 20020401 एककिग्रा

छिड़क सिंचाई तंत्र केलिए पॉलीइथाइलीन पाइप

14151 2 0 1994 छिड़क सिंचाई तंत्र युग्मक के लिए पॉलीइथाइलीन पाइप

14158 0 0 1994 सिफ्लुथ्रिनी डब्ल्यूपी

42000

35000

0.15 20020401 एकसेट

49000

41000

0.25 20020401 100किग्रा

14182 0 0 1994

49000

41000

345.6 20020401 एकलिटर

यूपीवीसी पाइप और फिटिंग के साथ प्रयुक्तविलायक सीमेंट

14183 0 0 1994 करतप हाइड्रोक्लोराइड एस पी 14184 0 0 1994 करतप हाइड्रोक्लोराइड, जी

14220 0 01994 खुले कुएँ के निमज्जनीय पम्पसेट 14268 0 0 1995

49000

41000

0.2 20020401

एक टन

42000

35000

660 20020401

एक टन

49000

41000

20020401 1 पम्पसेट

36000

29000

28.8 20020401

1मीटरी टन

अलेपित प्रतिबल विमोचित निम्न शिपिलन सात लड़ी वाले पूर्वप्रतिबलित कंक्रीट

84000

72000

28.8 20020401 9335 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

इकाई दर

इकाई

उत्पाद

प्रचालन तिथि भाग अनु वर्ष

छोटे पैमाने पर

न्यूततम मुहरांकन शुल्क बड़े पैमाने पर

भारतीय मानक सं.

20020401

0.15

35000

42000

एक वर्ग मीटर

सीमेंट बंधित पार्टिकल बोर्ड

0 0 1995

14276

20020401

0.18

72000

84000

1 कि.ग्रा.

सीवर के लिए एच डीपी ई पाइप

0 0 1996

14333

0.3 20020401

41000

49000

1कि.ग्रा..

14399

0 1996 तप्त दाब संचकित तापढ़ जी आर पी परिच्छेदी जल संग्रह टंकियों

20020401

0.12

41000

49000

एक कि.ग्रा.

जी आर पी पाइप , जोड़ और फिटिंग

14402

0 1996

20020401

1.6

29000

35000-

1लिटर

इथेफॉन विलयन

0 1996

14409

20020401

43.2

108000

120000

1 टन

14433

0 1997 शिशुओं के दूध छुडाने के पदार्थ प्रतिस्थापित भाग 1 दूध प्रोटीन आधारित

20020401

14.4

26000

33000

100एम मीटर

14494

0 1998 खदानों में प्रयुक्त इलास्टोमर रोधित नम्यकेबल

20020401

0.25

29000

36000

1 कि.ग्रा..

थियोफिनेट मिथायल डब्ल्यूपी

14552

0 1998

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

14846

0 2000

एक वाल्व

(साइज 300 मिमीतक)

20020401

14.4

24000

30000

0 0 2000

14846

एक वाल्व (साइज

350 मिमी से 1200 मिमी)

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व (350से 1200 मिमी साइज)

20020412

25000

31000

एक एमटी.

साधारण नमक आयरनफोर्टिफाइड

12981

0 1991

20020413

0.25

25000

31000

एक बेयरिंग

टेपर रोलर बेयरिंग

0 1987

12102

20020430

29000

36000

1किग्रा.

बेटा कारोटॉन- खाद्य ग्रेड

1966

3841

20020701

84000

96000

1 एम टी.

14885

0 2001 गैसीय इंधन की पूर्ति के लिए पालिईथाईलीनपाइप

20020722

25000

31000

1 अदद

7080 3 01992 एम टी पी चूषण उपकरण भाग 3 विद्युत चालित

20020723

29000

36000

1 माइक्रोस्कोप

रिसर्च माइक्रोस्कोप

1969

5204

20020724

8.65

84000

120000

1सिलिडर

4 0 2001

3196

अल्पदाब द्रवमान गैसों के लिए 5 - लिटर सेअधिक जल क्षमता वाले वेल्डित अल्प कार्बन इस्पात के सिलिण्डर भाग4- आविषालु और संक्षारक गैसों केलिये सिलिडर

[फा. सं.-सीएमडी-4:13:10]

बलवंत राय , उप महानिदेशक 9336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 25th November, 2004

S. O. 3142.- In pursuance of sub - regulation (3) of regulation 6 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the Marking fee for the products given in the schedule:

THE SCHEDULE

IS.NoPT.Sec . Year Product

UNIT 3829 2 0 1985 STEAM STERILIZERS , PRESSURE ONE STERILIZER AND VERTICAL CYLINDERICAL TYPE

3830 0 0 1979

1 WATER STILL

WATER STILLS FOR PYROGEN - FREE DISTILLED WATER

3831 0 0 1979

MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Rate

Large Scale

Small Scale

24000

17000

86.4 20020401 24000

17000

86.4 20020401

ONE STERILIZER

STERILIZER SHALLOW (DRESSING DRUM)

3832 0 0 1986

1 CHAIN PULLEY

HAND OPERATED CHAIN PULLEY BLOCKS

BLDCK 3843 0 0 1995 STEEL BACK FLAP HINGES 100 PIECES 3865 0 0 1993 BEER

100 LITRES 3901 0 0 1975 ZIRAM, WDP

1TONNE 0

3902

0 1975 DIMETHOATE , TECHNICAL

ONE TONNE 3903 0 0 1984 DIMETHOATE , EC

100 LITRE 3944 0 0 1982 FLOW CUPS

1 PIECE 3975 0 0 1988

1 TONNE

MILD STEEL WIRES , STRIPS ANO TAPES FOR ARMOURING OF CABLES

3976 0 0 2003

1 PAIR

PROTECTIVE RUBBER CANVAS BOOTS FOR MINERS

3984 0 0 1967 OW- FLOUR BAGS

1 TONNE 3989 0 0 1984

1 TONNE

CENTRIFUGALLY CAST ( SPUN ) IRON SPIGOT AND SOIL PIPES 3993 0 0 1993 TRAYS INSTRUMENTS

ONE TRAY 1

4003

019

1 PIECE

PIPE WRENCHES PART 1 GENERAL PURPOSE

4003

0 1986 PIPE WRENCHES ( HEAVY OUTY) 1 24000

17000

1.45 20020401 24000

17000

14.4 20020401 18000

26000

0.6 20020401 24000

7.2

17000

20020401 24000

17000

28.8 20020401 29000

22000.

144

20020401 29000

22000

28.8 20020401 27000

20000

2.9 20020401 24000

17000

8.65 20020401 30000

24000

0.35 20020401 24000

17000

14.4 20020401 24000

17000

7.2 20020401 24000

17000

0.35 20020401 36000

29000

0.3 20020401 24000

PIPE WRENCH

17000

4.35 20020401 9337 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

MIN. MARKING FEE Unit

UNIT

Enforcement Date IS.NOPT.Sec . Year Product

Rate

Small Scale

Large Scale

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

ONE VALVE

0 1986

4038 0

FOOT VALVES FOR WATER WORKS PURPOSES

20020401

7.2

17000

24000

100 LITRE

20020401 0 1988 GIN

7.2 4100 0

17000

24000

100 PIECES

KADAHIES

20020401 0 1967

4.35 4109 0

17000

24000

ONE PIPE WRENCH

CHAIN PIPE WRENCHES

0 1982

4123 0

20020401

41000

49000

100 SQ . METER

HOSPITAL RUBBER SHEETINGS

0 1974

4135

20020401

0.45

17000

24000

ONE DISCUS

DISCUS

20020401 0 1967

1.45 4142 0

17000

24000

100 PAIRS

20020401 SURGICAL RUBBER GLOVES

0.35 0 1989

4148 0

24000

30000

1 PIECE

0 1993

4151

20020401

0.35 PROTECTIVE HELMETS (MOTORCYCLE RIDERS)

18000

26000

ONE SQ. METRE

0 0 1977

4174

20020401 TYPEWRITTER RIBBONS, COTTON

17000

24000

ONE KILO LITRE

20020401 LIQUID SOAP

2.9 0 1990

20000

4199

27000

1 STOVE

0 2002

4246

20020401 DDMESTIC GAS STOVES FOR USE WITH LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GASES

2.9

20000

27000

1PIECE

0 1980

4250

20020401

7.2 ELECTRIC FODD MIXERS (LIQUIDIZERS AND GRINDERS )

17000

24000

1TONNE

0 2001

4270

20020401

1.45 STEEL TUBES USED FOR WATER WELLS

17000

24000

1PIECE

20020401 HOT AIR FANS

0.15 0 1981

17000

4283

24000

0 2003

4308

DRY CHEMICAL POWDER FOR 1 KG FIGHTING B AND C CLASS FIRES

20020401

201.6

22000

29000

1TONNE

20020401

7.2 THIRAM TECHNICAL

0 1982

17000

4320 0

24000

1TONNE

20020401 ENDOSULFAN , DP

28.8 0 1967

22000

4322

29000

100 LITRE

20020401 ENDOSULFAN , EC

2.9 0 1980

17000

4323 0

24000

1MICRDSCOPE

ΜΟNOCULAR DISSECTING

0 1967

4328 0

20020401

144 MICROSCOPE

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

20020401

57.6 ENDOSULFAN , TECHNICAL

24000

0 1978

4344

30000

ONE TONNE

20020401

0.06 STEEL DOOR FRAMES

14000

0 1976

4351 0

20000

1 SQ. METRE

0 1977

4355

20020401

1.45 FIRE - RESISTANT BRATTICE CLOTH

17000

24000

1DISC

0 1985

4366

20020401

7.2 AGRICULTURAL TILLAGE -DISCS , PART-1 CONCAVE TYPE

17000

24000

MICROSCOPE

20020401

8.65 PATHOLOGICAL MICROSCOPE 1

17000

0 1967

24000

4381

0 1967

20020401 4382

0.3 NON - TINTED OPTHALMIC GLASS 1000 BLANKS BLANKS

17000

24000

1PIECE

20020401

21.6 PUTTING SHOTS

17000

0 1988

24000

4386

1TONNE

0 1981

4396

BARIUM NITRATE FOR EXPLOSIVE AND PYROTECHNIC COMPOSITIONS 9338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] IS.NOPT.Sec . Year Product

UNIT

MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Rate

Large Scale

Small Scale

4447 0 0 1995

1KG.

24000

17000

SODIUM BENZOATE, FOOD GRADE

0.15 20020401 4448 0 0 1994 BENZOIC ACID FOOD GRADE 1TONNE

30000

24000

86.4

20020401 4449 0 0 1988 WHISKIES

100 LITRE

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 4450 0 0 1988 BRANDIES

100 LITRES

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 4467 0 0 1996 CARAMEL , PLAIN

ONEKg.

24000

17000

0.15 20020401 4521 0 0 1977

ONE TONNE

36000

29000

86.4 20020401 WIRE ROPE FOR OIL WELLS AND OIL WELL DRILLING

4533 0 0 1995 SUCTION APPARATUS

1APPARATUS

24000

17000

8.65 20020401 4588 0 0 1986 RAW NATURAL RUBBER

1TONNE

24000

17000

21.6 20020401 4615 0 0 1968

100 PIECES

24000

17000

2.9 20020401 SWITCH SOCKET OUTLETS (NON -INTERLOCKING TYPE )

4665 2 0 1984

ONE TOOL

49000

38000

4.35 20020401 PORTABLE ELECTRIC MOTOR OPERATED TOOLS

4704 0 0 1985

1 KG

24000

17000

SILVER TIN DENTAL AMALGAM ALLOY

14.4 20020401 4717 0 0 1980

100 SQ . METRES

24000

17000

ZINC OXIDE SELF-ADHESIVE PLASTER

5.8 20020401 4723 0 0 1978 EGG POWDER

1KG

24000

17000

0.6 20020401 4752 0 0 1994

1 KG

24000

17000

0.15

SODIUM METABISULPHITE , FOOD GRADE

20020401 4766 0 0 1982 THIRAM WDP

1 TONNE

24000

17000

28.8 20020401 4783 0 0 1982

ONE TONNE

24000

17000

57.6

THIRAM SEED DRESSING FORMULATIONS

20020401 4832

1 0 1969

1 TONNE

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 CHEMICAL RESISTANT MORTARS ( SILICATE TYPE)

4832

0 1969

ONE TONNE

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 CHEMICAL RESISTANT MORTARS PT- II , RESIN TYPE

4832 3 0 1968

ONE TONNE

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 CHEMICAL RESISTANT MORTARS PT - III SULPHUR TYPE

4923 0 0 1997

1 TONNE

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 HOLLOW STEEL SECTION FOR STRUCTURAL USE

4927 0 0 1992

100 METRE

24000

17000

11.55 20020401 UNLINED FLAX CANVAS HOSE FOR FIRE FIGHTING

4929

0 1978 DICHLORVOS , TECHNICAL ONE TONNE

29000

22000

144 20020401 4947 0 0 1985

1CARTRIDGE

24000

17000

1.45 20020401 GAS CARTRIDGE FOR USE IN FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

4956 0 0 1977

ONE TONNE

49000

41000

7.2 20020401 SYNTHETIC DETERGENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES

4964 0 0 1991 PLAIN - KNITTED COTTON VESTS 100 VESTS

24000

17000

4.35 20020401 4984 0 0 1995

1 TONNE

33000

26000

72 20020401 H.D. POLYETHYLENE PIPES FOR POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES.SEWAGE ANDINDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS 9339

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

UNIT

Product

Sec. Year

PT.

IS.No

0 0 2000

4985

UNPLASTICISED PVC PIPES FOR 1 TONNE POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES

1LITRE 1 0 1985

4989

FOAM COMPOUND FOR FIRE FIGHTING ( PROTIEN FOAM)

1LITRE 2 0 1984

4989

FOAM CONCENTRATE FDR PRODUCTING MECHANICAL FOAM FOR FIRE FIGHTING ( PART 2) AQUEOUS FILM FORMING FOAM (AFFF)

ONE LITRE 0 1987

4989

FOAM CONCENTRATE (COMPOUND) FOR PRODUCING MECHANICAL FOAM FORFIRE FIGHTING PART 3 FLOURO PROTEIN FOAM

Unit

MIN. MARKING FEE

Enforcement Date

Rute

Small

Large

Scale

20020401

35000

42000

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

ONE SQ . METRE

0 0 1993

4990

PLYWOOD FOR CONCRETE SHUTTERING WORK

ONE STERILIZER

0 0 1989

5022

STERILIZER INSTRUMENT (TABLEMODEL)

1 BED STEAD

0 1979

5029 0

BED STEADS , HOSPITAL, GENERAL PURPOSES

ONE PIECE

DECORATIVE LIGHTING OUTFITS 0 1969

5077 0

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

20020401

14.4

41000

49000

20020401

0.22

17000

24000

20020401

8.65

17000

24000

1000 SHEETS

STENCIL PAPER

0 1993

5086 0

100 PIECES

0 1991

5101 0

TWIST DRILLS , PARALLEL SHANKS , JOBBER SERIES

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

20020401

7.2

17000

24000

100 PIECES

0 1969

51030

TWIST DRILLS , MORSE TAPER SHANKS

1 DUSTER

0 1994

5135

HAND ROTARY DUSTER (BELLY MOUNTED)

20020401

2.9

17000

24000

20020401

2.9

17000

24000

ONE DUSTER

01994

5135

HAND ROTARY DUSTER SHOULDER MOUNTED TYPE

20020401

0.35

22000

29000

ONE PIECE

0 1988

5143 0

ADJUSTABLE AXILLARY CRUTCHES

0 1969

5161 0

FLEXIBLE ELECTRIC HEATING PADS FOR DOMESTIC USE

1TONNE

0 1992

5175 0

POLYPROPYLENE ROPES (3-STRAND HAWSERLAID AND 8-STRAND PLAITED)

1KG 0 1993

5191 0

SODIUM ALGINATE , FOOD GRADE

0 1991

5244

SAFE DEPOSIT LOCKER CABINET

100 LITRE

DICHLOROVOS, EC

0 1978

5277 0

1TONNE

DICOFOL, TECHNICAL 0 0 1969

5278

100 LITRE

DICOFOL , EC

0 1969

5279

100LITRE

FENITROTHION, EC

0 1979

5281

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

ONE HEATING PAD

20020401

17000

24000

20020401

0.35

17000

24000

20020401

14.4

35000

42000

ONE SAFE DEPOSIT LOCKER CABINET

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

240

29000

36000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000 9340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] IS.No PT. Sec. Year Product

UNIT

MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Small

Large

Rate

Scale

5290 0 0 1993

1VALVE

26000

18000

2.9

LANDING VALVES FOR INTERNAL HYDRANT

20020401 0

5291

0 1969

ONE TABLE

24000

17000

86.4

TABLE OPERATION , HYDRAULIC , MAJOR

20020401 1

5312

0 1984

1VALVE

30000

24000

2.9

SWING CHECK TYPE REFLUX (NON - RETURN) VALVE

20020401 5312 2 0 1986

1 VALVE

49000

41000

144 20020401 SWING CHECK TYPE REFLUX VALVES FOR DOMESTIC PURPOSES

5342 0 0 1996 ASCORBIC ACID , FOOD GRADE ONE KG

24000

17000

0.35 20020401 5348 0 0 1981 STAPLES

36000

29000

2.4 20020401

100PACKETS,

EACH CONTAINING

1000 STAPLES

5380 0 0 1976

1KG .

24000

17000

0.15 20020401 SODIUM BROMIDE PHOTOGRAPHIC GRADE

5410 0 0 1992

100 KG

33000

26000

CEMENT PAINT COLOUR AS REQUIRED

7.2 20020401 5423 0 0 1989

1 PIECE

36000

29000

0.15 20020401 TELESCOPIC TYPE HYDRAULIC SHOCK ABSORBERS FOR AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION

5424 0 0 1969

1MAT

24000

17000

4.35

RUBBER MATS FOR ELECTRICAL PURPOSES

20020401 5456 0 0 1985 AIR- COMPRESSORS

1 COMPRESSOR

30000

24000

21.6 20020401 5470 0 0 2002

ONE TONNE

29000

22000

14.4 20020401 DI - CALCIUM PHOSPHATE ANIMAL FEED GRADE

5485 0 0 1980 COTTON YARN WASTE

ONE TONNE

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 5487 0 Ο 1992 ΜΕΤAL POLISH , LIQUID

ONE KILO LITRE

24000

17000

43.2 20020401 5509 0 0 1980 FIRE RETARDANT PLYWOOD

ONE SQ . METRE

36000

29000

0.15 20020401 5531 0 0 1988

1TONNE.

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 CAST IRON SPECIALS FOR ASBESTOS - CEMENT PRESSURE PIPES

5557 0 0 1995

1PAIR

24000

17000

0.3 20020401 INDUSTRIAL AND SAFETY RUBBER KNEE BOOTS

5604

0 1984

1 MACHINE

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 UNIVERSAL GEARLESS HAND OPERATED PULLING AND LIFTING MACHINES

5672 0 0 1992

1 TONNE

24000

17000

11.55 20020401 MINERAL MIXTURES FOR SUPPLEMENTING POULTRY FEEDS

5676 0 0 1995

100 PAIRS

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 MOULDED SOLID RUBBER SOLES AND HEELS

5679

0 1986 MINERS CAP LAMPS

1 PIECE

24000

17000

0.45 20020401 5695 0 0 1970 SPECTACLE LENSES

30000

24000

7.2

20020401

100 SPECTACLE

LENSES

5719 0 0 1970 GELATIN , FOOD GRADE

1KG .

24000

17000

0.15 20020401 9341 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Unit

MIN. MARKING FEE

UNIT

Enforcement Date Product

IS.No PT. Sec. Year

Small Rate Scale

Large Scale

20020401

0.22

22000

29000

ONE LITRE

ANTIFREEZE COOLANT

0 1994

5759 0

20020401

14.4

17000

24000

1APPARATUS

0 1980

5780 0

INTRINSICALLY SAFE ELECTRICAL APPARATUS AND CIRCUITS

20020401

3.6

17000

24000

100 PAIRS

0 1996

5852

PROTECTIVE STEEL TOE CAP FOR FOOTWEAR

20020401

0.75

17000

24000

1 SQ. METRE

TUFTED WOOL CARPETS

0 1993

5884 0

20020401

28.8

26000

33000

100 METRE

0 0 1980

5894

RUBBER HOSE FOR SAND BLASTING

20020401

0.35

20000

27000

100 METRE

SHOT FIRING CABLES

0 1984

20020401 5950 0

86.4

17000

24000

1 TONNE

COTTON BELTING DUCKS

20020401 0 1984

5996 0

8.65

17000

24000

1 TONNE

0 0 1983

6003

INDENTEO WIRE FOR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

20020401

17.3

29000

36000

ONE TONNE

0 1983

6006

UNCOATED STRESS RELIEVED STRAND FOR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

20020401

1.1

17000

24000

FAST GREEN FCF , FOOD GRADE 1 KG

0 1994

6022

20020401

0.15

17000

24000

0 1971

6031 0

20020401 CALCIUM PROPIONATE , FOOD 1 KG GRADE

0.75

17000

24000

0 1987

6036

ALGINATE DENTAL IMPRESSION 1 KG MATERIAL

20020401

0.75

17000

24000

0 1970

6037

ZINC OXIDE - EUGENOL DENTAL 1 KG IMPRESSION PASTE

20020401

21.6

17000

24000

ONE TONNE

SCOURING POWDER

20020401 0

2.9

0 1970

6047

48000

57000

1000 PIECES

0 1985

6071

20020401 SYNTHETIC BATTERY SEPERATOR FOR LEAD- ACID BATTERIES

2.9

17000

24000

10 SQ. METRE

0 1971

6073 0

20020401 AUTOCLAVED REINFORCED CELLULAR CONCRETE FLOOR AND ROOF SLABS

86.4

17000

24000

ONE TABLE

0 1971

6106 0

20020401 TABLE OPERATION , HYDRAULIC , MINOR

0.75

17000

24000

SODA ASH , FUSED , TECHNICAL 1 TONNE

0 1981

6135 0

20020401

0.75

17000

24000

1TONNE

0 1987

6155 0

20020401

28.8

SODIUM CARBONATE (MONOHYDRATE)

22000

29000

100 LITRE

20020401 PHOSPHAMIDON , WSC

3.6

0 0 1981

6177

17000

24000

100 PAIRS

20020401 MUO GUARDS

2.9

0 1971

17000

6218

24000

SQ . METRE

0 0 1979

6248

20020401

21.6

METAL ROLLING SHUTTERS & 1 ROLLING GRILLS

20000

27000

ONE KILO LITRE

0 1994

6312

POLYETHYLENE CONTAINERS FOR TRANSPORT OF MATERIALS

3530 G1/2004-8 9342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 20, 1926

IS.No PT. Sec. Year Product

UNIT 6315 0 0 1992

1PIECE

FLOOR SPRINGS (HYDRAULICALLY REGULATED) FOR HEAVY DOORS

6385 0 0 1978 SACCHARIN , FOOD GRADE 1KG 0

6392

0 1971 STEEL PIPE FLANGES

1PIECE 6406 0 0 1994

1KG

BRILLIANT BLUE , FCF , FOOO GRACE

6438 0 0 1980

1 TONNE

ALUMINIUM PHOSPHIOE FORMULATION

6444 0 0 1979 SULPHUR DUSTING POWDERS

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Rate

Large Scale

Small Scale

24000

17000

4.35 20020401 24000

17000

0.35 20020401 24000

17000

1.45

20020401 24000

17000

1.1 20020401 29000

22000

57.6 20020401

1 TONNE

6446 0 0 1986

100PEICES

MICA INSULATED HEATING ELEMENTS

6471 0 0 1971

1PIECE

SPECTROMETER ( STUDENT TYPE)

6593 0 0 1972

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 30000

24000

2.9 20020401 36000

29000

24 20020401

ONE PIECE

ELECTRIC SEROLOGICAL WATER BATH

6595 1 0 1993

1 PUMP

HORIZONTAL CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS FOR CLEAR , COLO, FRESH WATER FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES

6639 0 0 1972

27000

20000

21.8 20020401 27000

20000

4.35 20020401

1 TONNE

HEXAGONAL BOLTS FOR STEEL STRUCTURES

6701 0 0 1985

100 LAMPS

TUNGSTEN FILAMENT MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRIC LAMPS

6750

0 1985

ONE PIECE

CYLINOER LINERS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE 6793 0 0 1996 FUMARIC ACID , FOOO GRADE 1 KG 6887 0 0 1986

1KG

OENTURE BASE POLYMER RESINS

6901 0 0 1988

1 PIECE

PRESSURE REGULATORS FOR GAS - CYLINOERS USEO IN WELDING , CUTTING ANO RELATED PROCESSES

6937 0 0 1997 OVERHEAO PROJECTORS

1PIECE 1

6994

0 1973 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY GLOVES

27000

20000

21.6 20020401 36000

29000

0.9 20020401 27000

20000

0.22 20020401 24000

17000

0.15 20020401 20000

14000

0.75 20020401 24000

17000

2.9 20020401 49000

41000

7.2 20020401

100 PAIRS

7079

0 1995

100 PIECES

AUTOMOTIVE HYDRAULIC BRAKE HOSES

7092 1 0 1992

1 TONNE

ALUMINIUM ALLOY TUBE FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES (WELDED TUBES )

7092 2 0 1987

1TONNE ALUMINIUM ALLOY TUBE FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES (EXTRUDED TUBES )

20000

14000

7.2

20020401 36000

29000

7.2 20020401 29000

22000

72 20020401 29000

22000

20020401 9343

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

UNIT

Product

IS.No PT. Sec . Year

100 METRE 1 0 1988

7098

CROSS LINKED POLYETHYLENE INSULATED PVC SHEATHED CABLES FOR WORKING VOLTAGES UPTO AND INCLUDING 1100 V

Unit

MIN. MARKING FEE

Enforcement Date

Rate

Small Scale

Large Scale

3.6 20020401 26000

33000

20020401

14.4

26000

33000

100METRE

XLPE CABLES ( 3.3-33KV)

2 0 1985

7098

1 TONNE

CARBARYL , WDP

0 1973

7121 0

100 LITRE

HAIR OILS

01993

7123 0

ONE KG .

0 0 1989

7173.

SLOTTED PAN HEAD TAPPING SCREWS

100 METRE 0 1994

7193

GLASS FIBRE BASE COAL TAR PITCH AND BITUMEN FELTS

1 CISTERN 0 1984

7231

PLASTIC FLUSHING CISTERNS (VALVELESS SYPHONIC TYPE )

20020401

28.8

17000

24000

20020401

2.9

17000

24000

20020401

0.35

29000

36000

20020401

5.8

20000

27000

0.75 20020401

20000

27000

20020401

288

17000

24000

ONE TONNE

2,4- D ETHL ESTER, TECHNICAL 0 1991

7233 0

8.65 20020401

84000

120000

1 CYLINDER

0 1988

7285 0

SEAMLESS MANGANESE STEEL CYLINDER FOR PERMANENT AND HIGH PRESSURELIQUEFIABLE GASES

20020401

8.65

84000

120000

1 CYLINDER

0 0 1993

7312

WELDED LOW CARBON STEEL DISSOLVED ACETYLENE GAS CYLINDERS

1 TONNE 0 1992

7328

HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE MATERIALS FOR MOULDING & EXTRUSION

1 ENGINE

0 1974

7347

SMALL SIZE SPARK IGNITION ENGINES FOR AGRICULTURAL SPRAYERS ANDSIMILAR APPLICATIONS

20020401

14.4

26000

33000

20020401

1.8

29000

36000

20020401

1.45

18000

26000

1000 BLADES

SAFETY RAZOR BLADES 0 1982

7371

1 PIECE 0 1995

7372 0

LEAD-ACID STORAGE BATTERIES FOR MOTOR VEHICLES

FILTERS FOR DRINKING WATER ONE FILTER

0 1986

7402 0

100BAGS

1 0 1984

7406

LAMINATED JUTE BAGS FOR PACKING FERTILIZERS

1 TONNE

0 1990

7452 0

HOT ROLLED STEEL SECTIONS FOR DOORS WINDOWS & VENTILATORS

1 CHAIR

0 0 1991

7454

WHEEL CHAIRS, FOLDING , WITH REMOVABLE ARMRESTS AND SWINGING FOOTRESTS

20020401

0.75

22000

29000

20020401

0.3

17000

24000

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

20020401

11.55

17000

24000

20020401

4.35

18000

26000

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

100 GASKETS

0 1994

7466 0

RUBBER GASKETS FOR PRESSURE COOKERS 9344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

IS.No, PT. Sec. Year Product

UNIT 7577 0 0 1986

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Rate

Large Scale

Small Scale

1 PIECE

GAS TESTING FLAME SAFETY LAMPS

7586 0 0 1975 FRICTION PROPS FOR MINES 1 PIECE 7593

1 0 1986

ONE SPRAYER

POWER OPERATED PNEUMATIC SPRAYER -CUM- DUSTER, PART 1, KNAPSACK TYPE

7620

1 0 1986

24000

17000

2.4 20020401 24000

17000

7.2 20020401 33000

26000

5.8 20020401

ONE MACHINE

MEDICAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPEMNT - DIAGONOSTIC X- RAY EQUIPMENT PART 1MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS 7652 0 0 1988

1METER

SPHYGMOMANOMETER, ANEROID TYPE

7653 0 0 1975

1 PIECE

MANUAL BLOWPIPES FOR WELDING AND CUTTING.

7834

0 1987

100 PIECES

INJECTION MOULDED PVC SOCKET FITTINGS WITH SOLVENT CEMENTJOINTS FOR WATER SUPPLIES

7903 0 0 1995

42000

35000

216 20020401 24000

17000

2.9 20020401 24000

17000

1.45 20020401 24000

17000

7.2 20020401

100 SQ. METRE

TARPAULINS MADE FROM HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE WOVEN FABRIC

7913 0 0 1975

24000

17000

5.8 20020401

1 INTEGRAL STEM

INTEGRAL STEMS FOR PERCUSSIVE DRILLING

7933 0 0 1975

1KG

FLEXIBLE POLYURETHANE FOAM FOR DOMESTIC PURPOSES

7948 0 0 1987

100 LITRE

FENTHION EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATES

7976 0 0 1976 PHORATE , TECHNICAL

ONE TONNE .

8025

0 Ο 1990 ΜΟΝOCROTOPHOS TECHNICAL 24000

17000

1.45 20020401 24000

17000

0.45 20020401 29000

22000

28.8 20020401 29000

22000

144 20020401

ONE TONNE

8028 0 0 1987 QUINALPHOS , EC

100 LITRE 8029 0 0 1985 QUINLPHOS DUSTING POWDERS 29000

22000

288 20020401 29000

22000

28.8 20020401

1 TONNE

8034 0 0 1989 SUBMERSIBLE PUMPSETS FOR ONE PUMPSET CLEAR COLD FRESH WATER 8035 0 0 1976 SHALLOW WELL HAND PUMPS 1 PUMP 8072 0 0 1984 QUINALPHOS , TECHNICAL

ONE TONNE 8074 0 Ο 1990 ΜΟΝOCROTOPHOS , WSC

100 LITRE 8144 0 0 1997 MULTIPURPOSE DRY BATTERIES 24000

17000

7.2 20020401 27000

20000

14.4 20020401 24000

17000

1.45 20020401 29000

22000

144 20020401 29000

22000

28.8 20020401

1000 PIECES

8187

0 1976

100 FUSES

D -TYPE FUSES ( FUSE LINKS ONLY)

27000

20000

1.45 20020401 41000

34000

3.6 20020401 9345

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

UNIT

Product

Year

IS.No PT. Sec .

0 1976

Unit

MIN. MARKING FEE

Enforcement Dute

Rate

Small Scale

Large Scale

20020401

3.6

34000

41000

100 NOS OF SINGLE

POLE FUSE BASES

8187 0

D -TYPE FUSES (FUSE BASES AND CARRIER ASSEMBLY).

ONE KG.

0 1976

8255 0

FLEXIBLE LOAD BEARING POLYURETHENE FOAM COMPONENTS FOR VEHICLES

100 LITRE

OXYDEMETON - METHYL , EC 0 1976

8259 0

1KG

RHIZOBIUM INOCULANTS

0 1986

8268 0

1 PIECE 0 1976

8275 0

ΒΙΝOCULAR EYEPIECES FOR MICROSCOPES

20020401

0.75

26000

33000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

0.15

20000

27000

20020401

4.35

17000

24000

20020401

288

17000

24000

ONE TONNE

0 1993

8309

COMPRESSION TYPE TUBULAR TERMINAL ENDS FOR ALUMINIUM CONOUCOR OFINSULATED CABLES

100 PIECES

INSTRUMENT JEWELS

0 1976

8311

20020401

0.3

17000

24000

20020401

14.4

60000

72000

ONE TONNE

0 2000

8329

SPECIFICATION FOR CENTRIFUGALY CAST ( SPUN ) DUCTILE IRON PRESSUREPIPES FOR WATER, GAS & SEWAGE

1MT.

0 1977

8360

FABRICATED HDPE FITTINGS FOR POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES

1PROP

HYORAULIC PROPS

0 1977

8421

100METRE

0 1994

8423

CONTROLLED PERCOLATING HOSE FOR FIRE FIGHTING

1 PIECE 0 1989

8427

RUBBER ROLL FOR PADDY OEHUSKER

1MONITOR

0 1977

8442 0

STAND POST TYPE WATER MONITOR FOR FIRE FIGHTING

1 TONNE 0 1991

8445 0

CARBENDAZIM ( MBC ) TECHNICAL

1 PIECE 0 1989

8448

AUTOMATIC LINE VOLTAGE CORRECTORS ( STEP TYPE FOR DOMESTIC USE )

0 1977

8462 0

STRILIZER , PORTABLE . VERTICAL PRESSURE TYPE

1 PUMP 0 0 1998

8472

PUMPS - REGENERATIVE FOR CLEAR COLD WATER

100 LITRE

PHOSALONE , EC

0 1977

8487

20020401

144

48000

57000

21.6 20020401

22000

29000

20020401

11.55

17000

24000

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

20020401

21.6

29000

36000

288 20020401

22000

29000

1.45 20020401

17000

24000

20020401

21.6

35000

42000

ONE STERILIZER

20020401

2.4

35000

42000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

PHOSALONE , TECHNICAL 0 1977

8488

100 LITRE

ΤΕΜEPHOS , EC

0 1977

8498

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

0.22

26000

33000

ONE PISTON

0 1986

8503 0

ALLUMINUM ALLOY PISTONS FOR L.C. ENGINES

1 SET 0 1977

8522

RESPIRATORS , CHEMICAL CARTRIDGE

20020401

1.45

35000

42000 9346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] IS.No PT. Sec. Year Product

UNIT

MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Rate

Large Scale

Small Scale

8523 0 0 1977

24000

17000

4.35 20020401 RESPIRATORS , CANISTER TYPE ONE COMPLETE SET (GASMASKS)

8541 0 0 1993 FLOOR POLISH , PASTE

ONE KG .

24000

17000

0.15 20020401 8598 0 0 1987

ONE IDLER

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 IDLERS AND IDLER SETS FOR BELT CONVEYORS

8708 0 0 1978

ONE TONNE

24000

17000

28.8 20020401 ΜΑNCOZEB WATER DISPERSIBLE POWDER CONCENTRATES

8737 0 0 1995

1VALVE

24000

17000

0.35 20020401 VALVE FITTINGS FOR NEWLY MANUFACTURED LPG CYLINDERS

8749 0 0 2002 ΒΙO- GAS STOVE

26000

18000

1.45 20020401

1 GOBAR GAS

STOVE

8776 0 0 1988

ONE VALVE

24000

17000

0.35 20020401 VALVE FITTINGS FOR LPG CYLINDERS UP TO 5 LITRE WATER CAPACITY

8783 4 3 1995

100METERS

42000

35000

3.6 20020401 WINDING WIRES FOR SUBMERSIBLE MOTORS PART 4 INDIVIDUAL WIRES SEC.3POLYSTER AND POLY PROPYLENE WINDING WIRES

8828 0 Ο 1996

1 PIECE

57000

48000

0.22 20020401 ΜΙΝNIATURE AIR - BREAK CIRCUIT BREAKERS FOR VOLTAGES NOT EXCEEDING 1000V

8887 0 0 1995

ONE TONNE

72000

50000

7:2 20020401 BITUMEN EMULSION FOR ROADS ( CATIONIC TYPE )

8931 0 0 1993

1PIECE

24000

17000

0.3 20020401 CAST COPPER ALLOY FANCY BIB TAPS AND STOP TAPS

8934 0 0 1978

1PIECE

24000

17000

0.3 20020401 CAST COPPER ALLOY FANCY PILLAR TAPS FOR WATER SERVICES

8944 0 0 1978 CHLORPYRIFOS , EC

100 LITRE

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 8959 0 0 1978 FLUCHLORALIN , EC

100 LITRE

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 8962 0 0 1978

100 LITRE

29000

22000

57.6 20020401 CHLORMEQUAT CHLORIOE AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS

8963 0 0 1978 CHLORPYRIFOS TEHNICAL ONE TONNE

29000

22000

172.8 20020401 9020 0 0 2002

1THRESHER

24000

17000

21.6 20020401 POWER JHRESHERS , SAFETY REQUIREMENT

9031 0 0 1992

100ROLLS

49000

38000

7.2 20020401 TELEPRINTER PAPER PAGE ROLLS

9079 0 0 1989

27000

1 MONOSET PUMP

20000

7.2 20020401 ΜΟNOSET PUMPS FOR CLEAR , COLD, FRESH WATER FOR AGRICULTURE PURPOSES

9103 0 0 1979 ADMIXTURE FOR CONCRETE

49000

38000

43.2 20020401

1 KILO- LITRE/ONE

TONNE

9347

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

UNIT

Product

IS.No PT. Sec. Year

1GAUGE 0 1979

9121

INSPECTION GAUGES FOR CHECKING TYPE ( SIZE 2) TAPER THREADS OF GASCYLINDER VALVES, TAPER 1 IN 16

Unit

MIN. MARKING FEE

Enforcement Date

Rate

Small Scale

Large Scale

20020401

14.4

17000

24000

20020401

1.45

20000

27000

1000 PIECES

HEAVY- DUTY DRY BATTERIES 0 0 1999

9128

1KG 0 1979

9138 0

ΑΖOTOBACTER CHROOCOCCUM INOCULANTS

20020401

0.15

20000

27000

20020401

48000

57000

1000 NEEDLES

2 0 1992

9165

SUTURE NEEDLES , PART 2 EYED NEEDLES - SIZES , SHAPES AND DIMENSIONS

20020401

22000

29000

DNE TONNE

0 2002

9282 0

WIRE ROPES STRANDS FOR SUSPENSION BRIDGES

20020401

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

0 1979

9294

COLD ROLLED STAINLESS STEEL STRIP FOR RAZOR BLADES

0 1983

9295

STEEL TUBES FOR IDLERS FOR ONE TONNE TROUGHED BELT CONVEYORS

1 PUMP

DEEP WELL HAND PUMP

0 1990

9301

20020401

7.2

17000

24000

20020401

.4.35

22000

29000

20020401

1.45

17000

24000

ONE VALVE

0 1984

9338

CAST IRON SCREW STOP VALVE AND CHECK VALVE

100 LITRES

ALACHLOR EC

0 1980

9354 0

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

57.6

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

BUTACHLOR TECHNICAL

0 1980

9355 0

100LITRE

BUTACHLOR, EC

0 0 1980

9356

100LITRES

TRIALLATE EC

0 1980

9358

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

0 1995

9359

PHORATE GRANULES , ENCAPSULATED

1 TONNE 0 1980

9360

CARBOFURAN GRANULES ENCAPSULATED

1TONNE

BUTACHLOR GRANULES

0 1980

9362

20020401

22000

29000

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

20020401

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

LINDANE GRANULES

0 1980

9370

20020401

2.9

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

0 1987

9396 1

ROUND OPEN TOP SANITARY FOR FOODS AND DRINKSTIN PLATE

20020401

14.4

35000

42000

ONE APPARATUS

0 1980

9459

APPARATUS FOR USE IN MEASUREMENT OF LENGTH CHANGE OF HARDENED CEMENT PASTE , MORTAR AND CONCRETE

100 PIECE

0 0 1980

9473

FILTER TYPE PARTICULATE MATTER RESPIRATORS

20020401

14.4

29000

36000

20020401

14.4

17000

24000

ONE TONNE

CHAKKA AND SHRIKHAND 0 1980

9532 9348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] IS.No PT. Sec . Year Product

UNIT

MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Rate

Large Scale

Small Scale

9537

0 1983

100 METRES

49000

41000

4.35, 20020401 PLIABLE SELF RECOVERING CONDUITS OF INSULATING MATERIALS FORELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS

9562 0 0 1980

ONE HELMET

24000

17000

0.35

NON METAL HELMETS FOR POLICE FORCE

20020401 9563 0 0 1980

1PIECE

24000

17000

CARBON MONOXIDE FILTER SELF - RESCUERS

1.45 20020401 9656 0 0 1980

100 LITRES

29000

22000

TRIDEMORPH EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATES

28.8 20020401 9665 0 0 1981 PRPOXUR EC

100 LITRE

29000

22000

28.8 20020401 9758 0 0 1981

ONE PIECE

33000

26000

FLUSH VALVES FOR WC AND URINALS

2.9 20020401 0

9762

0 1994

100 PIECE

29000

22000

2.9 20020401 POLYETHLENE FLOATS ( SPHERICAL) FOR FLOAT VALVES

9815

0 1994

1 PIECE

24000

17000

21.6

SERVO MOTOR OPERATED LINE VOLTAGE CORRECTORS

20020401 9825 0 0 2003 CHLORINE TABLETS

1000 TABLETS

24000

17000

0.6 20020401 9836 0 0 1981 EXPLODERS

ONE PIECE

72000

60000

6.5 20020401 9857 0 0 1990

100 METRE

33000

26000

3.6 20020401 SINGLE CORE FLEXIBLE CABLES USED IN WELDING CIRCUITS

9937 0 0 1981

1 PIECE

24000

17000

14.4 20020401 PORTABLE METHANOMETER (ELECTRICAL TYPE)

9968

0 1988

100METER

27000

20000

0.35 20020401 ELASTOMER ISULATED CABLE -FOR WORKING VOLTAGES UP TO AND INCLUDING 1100 VOLTS

9968 2 0 2002

100 METER

33000

26000

14.4 20020401 ELASTOMER INSULATED CABLES FOR WORKING VOLTAGES FROM 3.3 KV UPTO AND INCLUDING 33 KV

9971 0 0 1981 LACTIC ACID , FOOD GRADE ONE M.TONNE

36000

29000

288 20020401 9974 1 0 1981 HPSV LAMPS

ONE LAMP

72000

60000

1.45 20020401 10027

0 0 1981

ONE SWITCH

36000

29000

0.75 20020401 COMPOSITE UNITS OF AIR BREAK SWITCHES AND REWIRABLE TYPE FUSES FORVOLTAGES UPTO AND INCLUDING 650 V AC

10080 0 0 1982

ONE PIECE

29000

22000

1.1 20020401 VIBRATION MACHINE FOR CASTING STANDARD CEMENT MORTAR CUBES ( FORCUBE MOULDS ONLY)

10086 0 0 1982

ONE PIECE

29000

22000

1.45 20020401 MOULDS FOR USE IN TESTS OF CEMENT AND CONCRETE

10119 0 0 1982

100 LITRE

24000

17000

7.2 20020401 READY TO USE INSECTICIDES FOR SPOT APPLICATION 9349 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Unit

MIN. MARKING FEE

UNIT

IS.No PT. Sec. Year Product

Enforcement Date

Rate

Small Scale

Large Scale

1.45 20020401

17000

24000

0 2001

10204 0

PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER ONE EXTINGUISHER MECHANICAL FOAM TYPE

20020401

2.9

17000

24000

100 BOXES

1 0 1986

10212

FIBRE CORRUGATED BOXES FOR COMMERCIAL HIGH EXPLOSIVES

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

100 LITRES

2,4- D ETHYL ESTER EC

0 1993

10243

20020401

28.8

20000

27000

100 LITRES

ETHION EC

0 0 1982

10319

20020401

1.45

24000

30000

ONE FITTING

5 1 1985

10322

FIXED GENERALPURPOSE LUMINIARES

20020401

2.9

29000

36000

ONE PIECE

RECESSED LUMINIRES

10322 5 2 1985

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

ONE PIECE

3 1987

10322 5

LUMINAIRE FOR ROAD AND STREET LIGHTING

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

ONE PIECE

FLOOD LIGHTS

5 1987

10322

1.1 20020401

17000

24000

ONE KG

POWDER HAIR DYES

0 1993

10350 0

20020401

288

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

ETHION TECHNICAL

0 1982

10369 0

20020401

21.6

17000

24000

1TONNE

LANCING PIPES

0 1982

10577 0

20020401

14.4

17000

24000

1 PIECE

10592

0 1982 INDUSTRIAL EMERGENCY SHOWERS , EYE AND FACE FOUNTAINS AND COMBINATION UNITS

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

1 COMPRESSOR

10617

0 1983, HERMETIC COMPRESSORS -HIGH TEMPERATURE APPLICATION GROUP

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

1 COMPRESSOR

1983

10617

HERMETIC COMPRESSORS -MEDIUM TEMPERATURE APPLICATION

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

ONE COMPRESSOR

0 1983

10617

LOW TEMPERATURE APPLICATION COMPRESSOR

20020401

17.3

34000

41000

1TONNE

VANASPATI

0 1999

10633 0

20020401

43.2

17000

24000

ONE TONNE

WHEEL BEARING GREASE

0 1983

10647 0

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

ONE EXTINGUISHER

0 1999

10658 0

HIGHER CAPACITY DRY POWDER FIRE EXTINGUISHER (TROLLEY MOUNTED)

0.3 20020401

24000

30000

1PAIR

0 1982

10665 0

SAFETY RUBBER ANKLE BOOTS FOR MINERS

20020401

21.6

22000

29000

100 METRE

0 0 1983

10733

ELECTRICALLY BONDED ROAD AND RAIL TANKER HOSE OF RUBBER

20020401

7.2

24000

30000

100 LITRES

0 1983

10758

DEODOURIZING CUM DISINFECTANT FLUIDS

20020401

1,45

24000

30000

ONE PIECE

BODY LEVELS HEARING AIDS

0 0 1984

10775

3530 GI/2004-9 9350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

IS.No PT. Sec . Year Product

UNIT 10805 0 0 1986

1 FOOT VALVE

FOOT VALVES FOR CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES 10840 0 0 1994

100 CONTAINERS

BLOW MOULDED HDPE CONTAINERS FOR VANASPATI 10891 1 0 1984 STEEL WIRE ROPES FOR AERIAL ONE TONNE ROPE WAYS - HAULAGE ROPES

10908 0 0 1991 FLEXIBLE RUBBER TUBING FOR 100 METRES LIQUEFIED PETROLEUMGAS 0 1984 ZIRAM CS

100 LITRES 11037 0 0 1984

ONE REGULATOR

ELECTRNIC TYPE FAN REGULATORS

11060 0 0 1984

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Rate

Large Scale

Small Scale

24000

17000

0.75 20020401 27000

20000

2.9 20020401 41000

34000

57.6 20020401 22000

29000

3.6 20020401 29000

22000

28.8 20020401 29000

22000

1.45 20020401

ONE TONNE

MOULDED RUBBERIZED COIR CUSHIONING

11087 0 0 1986

1 TONNE

PAPER FOR MAGNETIC INK CHARACTER RECOGUITION CHEQUE PRINTING

11188 1 0 1991 VAULT ( STRONG ROOM ) DOOR 1 DOOR 11225 0 0 1985

24000

17000

36 20020401 24000

17000

20020401 36000

29000

240 20020401 29000

36000

0.75 20020401

ONE PAIR OF

SHOES

LEATHER SAFETY SHOES FOR WOMEN WORKERS IN MINES AND STEEL PLANTS

11226 0 0 1993

ONE PAIR

LEATHER SAFETY FOOTWEAR DIRECT MOULDED SOLE 11246 0 0 1969

1 SQUATTING PAN

GLASS FIBRE REINFORCEO POLYESTER RESIN ( GRP) SQUALTING PINS

11248 0 0 1995

27000

20000

0.45 20020401 22000

29000

0.6 20020401

100 METER SQ

POLYSTER BLEND SUITING FOR UNIFORMS

11352 0 0 1994

1000 POUCHES

FLEXIBLE PACKS FOR THE PACKING OF EDIBLE OILS AND VANASPATI

11480 0 0 1985

24000

17000

8.4 20020401 24000

17000

2.9 20020401

ONE GRILLER

DOMESTIC GRILLERS FOR USE WITH LPG

11536 0 0 1997

ONE TONNE

PROCESSED CEREAL BASED WEANING FOODS

11722 0 0 1986

30000

24000

7.2 20020401 72000

60000

144 20020401

ONE TONNE

THIN WALLED FLEXIBLE QUICK COUPLING PIPES

11784 0 0 1986

ONE TONNE

CARBARYL BHC ( GAMMA) GRANULES

11785 0 0 1986 CAPTAN WP

ONE TONNE 11879 0 0 1986 ELECTRICAL STEAM COOKERS 24000

17000

21.6 20020401 36000

29000

86.4 20020401 24000

17000

28.8 20020401

ONE PIECE

11913

0 1986 TERT - BUTYL HYDROQUINONE 1 KG. T.B.H.Q.

49000

41000

2.2 20020401 49000

41000

1.2 20020401 9351 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Unit

MIN. MARKING FEE

UNIT

Product

IS.No PT. Sec. Year

Enforcement Date

Rate

Small Scale

Large Scale

6 20020401

41000

49000

1 PIECE

0 1987

11928

ROUND SLINGS MADE OF MAN-MADE FIBRE FOR GENERAL SERVICE -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

100 LITRE

DELTAMETHRIN EC

0 1987

11996

20020401

28.8

22000

29000

100 LITRE

FENVALERATE EC

0 1987

11997 0

20020401

288

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

FENVALERATE TECHNICAL

0 1987

12003

20020401

22000

29000

.ONE TONNE

ISOPROTURON TECHNICAL

0 1987

12004

20020401

144

22000

29000

100 KG

CYPERMETHRIN TECHNICAL

0 1987

12015 0

20020401

57.6

22000

29000

100 LITRE

CYPERMETHRIN EC

0 1987

12016

20020401

2.2

26000

33000

0 1987

12109 0

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ONE PIECE LIGHT DUTY SEWING MACHINE HEADS FORINDUSTRIAL USE

20020401

7.2

20000

27000

ONE PUMP

0 1997

12225 0

JET CENTRIFUGAL PUMP COMBINATION

20020401

0.07

29000

36000

0 1987

12231 0

UNPLASTICISED PVC PIPES FOR ONE KG USE IN SUCTION AND DELIVERY LINES OFAGRICULTURAL PUMPS

20020401

1.45

22000

29000

1 ONE SPRINKLER

0 1996

12232

ROTATING SPRINKLERS PART DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENT

20020401

0.45

17000

24000

ONE VALVE

0 1988

12234 0

PLASTIC EQUILIBRIUM FLOAT VALVES FOR COLD WATER . SERVICES

20020401

4.8

38000

49000

100 ROLLS

0 1987

12236 0

PAPER PAGE ROLLS FOR ADDING MACHINES/CALCULATORS

20020401

57.6

29000

36000

ONE TONNE

0 1988

12299

STEETENED PARTLY SKIMMED MILK POWDER

20020401

0.75

35000

42000

1VALVE

0 1988

12300 0

VALVE FITTINGS FOR SMALL PREON CYLINDERS

20020401

1.15

17000

24000

ONE

0 1988

12337 0

BROADCASTER

MANUALLY OPERATED FERTILIZER BROADCASTER

72 20020401

34000

41000

ONE TONNE

0 2001

12427 0

HEXAGON HEAD TRANSMISSION TOWER BOLTS

20020401

1.8

72000

96000

ONE PIECE

0 1988

12449

STARTING DEVICES ( OTHER THAN GLOW STARTORS) PART 2PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

20020401

17.3

29000

42000

ONE TONNE

MARGARINE

0 1988

12451

20020401

120

48000

57000

INHIBITED MINERAL INSULATING ONE KILO LITRE

0 1988

12463 0

OIL 9352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1926

IS.No PT. Sec. Year Product

UNIT 12492 0 0 1988

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Rate

Large Scale

Small Scale

100METRE

THERMOPLASTICS HOSES (TEXTILE REINFORCED ) FOR COMPRESSED AIR

12586 0 0 1988

ONE CYLINDER

BRAZED LOW CARBON STEEL GAS CYLINDERS NOT EXCEEDING 13 LITRES CAPACITY

12592 0 0 2002 PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE ONE TONNE COVERS AND FRAMES

12615 0 0 1989

ONEKW

INDUCTION MOTOR ENERGY EFFICIENT, 3 PHASE SQUIRREL CAGE

12640 1 0 2000 RESIDUAL CURRENT OPERATED ONE PIECE CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR HOUSEHOLD AND SIMILAR

USES: PART 1 CIRCUIT-BREAKERS WITHOUT INTEGRAL OVERCURRENT PROT 12640 2 0 2001 RESIDUAL CURRENT OPERATED ONE PIECE

CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR HOUSEHOLD AND SIMILAR USES: PART 2

CIRCUIT-BREAKERS WITH INTEGRAL OVERCURRENT PROTECT

12650 0 0 1989

1MT

JUTE BAGS FOR PACKING FOOD GRAINS , 50 KG .

12701 0 0 1996

29000

22000

6.5 20020401 120000

84000

1.45 20020401 36000

29000

8.65 20020401 27000

20000

1.45 20020401 96000

84000

4.35 20020401 96000

84000

4.35 20020401 29000

22000

14.4 20020401 64000

48000

0.9 20020401

100 LITRE

CAPACITY

ROTATIONAL MOULDED POLYETHYLENE WATER STORAGE TANKS

12709 0 0 1994

ONE KG .

GLASS FIBRE REINFORCED PLASTIC PIPES FOR USE FOR WATER SUPPLY AND SEWARAGE

12751 0 0 1989 PENDIMETHALIN EC

100 LITRES 12769 0 0 1989 THIOBENCARB EC

100 LITRES 12785 0 0 1994 STRAINER TYPE FILTERS

ONE FILTER 12786 0 0 1989

ONE KG.

POLYETHYELENE PIPES FOR IRRIGATION LATERALS

12817 0 0 1997 STAINLESS STEEL BUTT HINGES 29000

22000

0.07 20020401 29000

22000

28.8 20020401 29000

22000

50.4 20020401 29000

22000

4.35 20020401 29000

22000

0.06 20020401

100 PIECES

12818 0 0 1992

1 TONNE

UPVC SCREEN AND CASING PIPES FOR BORE /TUBEWELL

12823 0 0 1990

29000

22000

1.75 20020401 36000

29000

72 20020401

1Sq.Metre

PRELAMINATED PARTICLE BOARD

12873 0 0 1990 COPPER OXYCHLORIDE , OP

57000

48000

0.22 20020401

ONE TONNE

12912 0 0 1990 BROMADIOLONE RB 0.005%

24000

17000

7.2

20020401

ONE TONNE

29000

22000

374.4

20020401 9353

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

UNIT

Product

Year

Sec.

PT.

IS.No

Unit

MIN. MARKING FEE

Enforcement Date

Rate

Small Scale

Large Scale

20020401

374.4

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

BROMADIOLONE CB

0 1990

12913 0

20020401

41000

49000

ONE TONNE

ACEPHATE , TECHNICAL

0 0 1990

12915

ONE TONNE

ACEPHATE , SP

0 1990

12916 0

100 Kg

ATRAZINE WP

0 1990

12931

0 1992

12933

SOLAR FLAT PLATE COLLECTOR

20020401

1080

22000

29000

20020401

22000

29000

20020401

8.65

26000

33000

ONE M SQ. OF

COVER PLATE

APERTURE

ONE SQ . METRE

2 0 1992

12933

SHEET FOR ABSORBER FOR SOLAR FLAT PLATE COLLECTOR

ONE PIECE 0 1991

13021 1

AC SUPPLIED ELECTRONIC BALLASTS FOR TUBULAR FLUORESCENT LAMPS : PART 1

GENERAL & SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

ONE PIECE 0 1991

13021

AC SUPPLIED ELECTRONIC BALLASTS FOR TUBULAR FLURESCENT LAMPS : PART 2

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

1VALVE 0 1991

13049

DIAPHRAGM TYPE ( PLASTIC BODY) FLOAT OPERATED VALVES FOR COLD WATER SERVICES

ONE HANDPUMP

0 1994

13056

DEEPWELL HAND PUMPS (VLDM)

ONE VALVE

0 1991

13095

BUTTERFLY VALVES FOR GENERAL PURPOSES

1 VALVE 0 1991

13114 0

FROGED BRASS GATE , GLOBE AND CHECK VALVES FOR WATERWORKS PURPOSES

20020401

1.45

41000

49000

20020401

2.2

35000

42000

20020401

2.2

48000

57000

20020401

1.1

29000

36000

20020401

4.35

22000

29000

20020401

28.8

24000

30000

20020401

0.5

35000

42000

20020401

43.2

22000

29000

ONE TONNE

0 1991

13138 0

ALPHA NAPTHYL ACETIC ACID , 4.5SL

1TONNE

CITRIC ACID , FOOD GRADE 0 1991

13186 0

ONE LITRE

INDELIBLE INK

0 1991

13209 0

ONE PUMP

0 1992

13287 0

EXTRA DEEP WELL HAND PUMPS

20020401

35000

42000

20020401

5.8

22000

29000

20020401

4.35

22000

29000

20020401

288

41000

49000

ONE TONNE

METRIHUZIN WP

0 1992

13333 0

20020401

28.8

29000

36000

ONE TONNE

0 1992

13334 2

SKIM MILK POWDER PT- 2. EXTRA GRADE

20020401

41000

49000

ONE ALTERNATOR

0 1992

13364

AC GENERATORS DRIVEN BY RECIPROCATING INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES : PART 1 ALTERNATORS RATED UPTO 20 KVA

1 PIECE 0 1992

13385

FIRE EXTINGUISHER 50 I CAPACITY WHEEL MOUNTED GAS CARTRIDGE TYPE

1PIECE 0 1992

13386

FIRE EXTINQUISHER 50 L CAPACITY MECHANICAL FOAM TYPE

20020401

48000

57000

20020401

48000

57000 9354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] IS.No PT. Sec. Year Product

UNIT

MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Date

Rate

Large Scale

13422 0

Smull Scale

0 1992

36000

DISPOSABLE SURGICAL RUBBER GLOVES

29000

100PAIR OF

GLOVES

1.45 20020401 13438 0 0 1992 ALLETHRIN MOSQUITO COILS

42000

35000

2.4 20020401

100 BOXes OF 5 DOUBLE COILS EACH

13439 0 0 1992 ALLETHRIN MOSQUITO MATS

24000

17000

0.15

ONE BOX OF 30 MATS

20020401 13457 0 0 1992 DELTAME THRIN WP

ONE M.T.

36000

29000

13466 0

936 20020401 0 1992

100 PIECES

BRUSHES FOR ELECTRICAL MACHINES

24000

17000

3.6

20020401 13487 0 0 1992

1000 EMITTERS

42000

35000

IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT- EMITTERS

7.2 20020401 13488 0 0 1992

100METRES

49000

41000

IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT EMITTING PIPE SYSTEM

3.25 20020401 13584 0 0 1993

1KG

29000

22000

BRUSH MATERIAL FOR ELECTRICAL MACHINERY

0.3 20020401 13592 0 0 1992

100 KG

49000

41000

17 20020401 UPVC PIPES FOR SOIL AND WASTE DISCHARGE SYSTEM INSIDE BUILDINGS INCLUDING VENTILATION AND RAIN WATER SYSTEM

13703 2 1 1993

100 PIECES

49000

41000

4.35 20020401 LOW VOLTAGE FUSES FOR VOLTAGES NOT EXCEEDING 1000V AC OR 1500V DCFUSES FOR USE BY AUTHORISED PERSONS

13730 0 0 1993

1 TONNE

27000

20000

57.6 20020401 WINDING WIRES ( PARTS 1 TO 34) MINIMUM MARKING FEE PAYABLE ONLY FOR FIRST LICENCE . FOR SUBSEQUENT LICENCES ONLY UNIT RATE PAYABLE

13779 0 0 1999

ONE METER

165000

145000

AC STATIC WATTHOUR METERS . CLASS 1 & 2

1.1

20020401 13785 0 0 1993 DODINE WP

ONE KG.

29000

22000

13790 0

1.45

20020401 Ο 1993 ΚΙΤAZIN EC 48 %

100 LITRES

29000

13801 0

22000

172.8

0 1993

20020401

10M2

36000

CHEQUERED CEMENT CONCRETE TILES

29000

2.9

20020401 13849

0 0 1993

1 EXTINGUISHER

42000

35000

0.75 20020401 PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS , DRY POWDER TYPE , STDRED PRESSURE

13947

2 0 1993

42000

35000

5.8 20020401 LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR & 1 NO. CONTROLGEAR : PART 2 CIRCUIT BREAKERS

13947

3 0 1993

1 PIECE

42000

LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND CONTROL GEAR

35000

0.75

20020401 13947

4 1 1993

ONE PIECE

42000

35000

0.22 20020401 LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND CONTROL GEAR, ELECTROMECHANICAL CONTACTORS AND MOTOR STARTERS 9355

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

UNIT

Product

IS.No PT. Sec. Year

Unit

MIN. MARKING FEE

Enforcement Date

Rate

Small Scale

Large Scale

0.35 20020401 35000

42000

ONE PIECE

1 1993

13947 5

LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND CONTROL GEAR PT . 5 CONTROL CIRCUIT DEVICES AND SWITCHIN ELEMENTS SEC .

1 ELECTROMECHANICAL CONTROL CIRCUIT

1 SINK 0 1994

13983 0

STAINLESS STEEL KITCHES SINKS FOR DOMESTIC PURPOSES

1DRUM

DRUMS , LARGE OPEN TOP 0 1994

13997 0

ONE KG .

0 1994

14151 1

POLYETHYLENE PIPES FOR SPRINKLER IRRIGATION SYSTEM

ONE SET 0 1994

14151 2

POLYETHYLENE PIPE FOR SPRINKLER IRRIGATION SYSTEM COUPLERS

100 KG.

CYFLUTHRIN , WP

0 1994

14158 0

ONE LITRE

0 0 1994

14182

SOLVENT CEMENT FOR USE WITH UPVC PIPE AND FITTINGS

20020401

0.75

29000

36000

20020401

0.75

35000

42000

0.15 20020401

35000

42000

0.25 20020401

41000

49000

20020401

345.6

41000

49000

20020401

0.2

41000

49000

20020401

660

35000

42000

ONE TONNE

CARTAP HYDROCHLORIDE, SP 14183 0 0 1994

CARTAP HYDROCHLORIDE , GONE TONNE

0 1994

14184 0

1PUMPSET

0 1994

14220

OPENWELL SUBMERSIBLE PUMPSETS

0 1995

14268 0

UNCOATED STRESS RELIEVED 1 MT LOW RELAXATION SEVEN-PLY STRAND FORPRESTRESSED CONCRETE

0 1995

14276 0

20020401

41000

49000

20020401

28.8

29000

36000

28.8 20020401

72000

84000

20020401

0.15

35000

42000

ONE SQUARE

METRE

CEMENT BONDED PARTICLE BOARDS

1KG

HDPE PIPE FOR SEWERAGE 0 1996

14333 0

1 KG.

0 1996

14399 1

HOT PRESSED MOULDED THERMOSETTING G.R.P. SECTIONAL WATER STORAGE TANKS

ONE KG .

0 0 1996

14402

GRP PIPES, JOINTA AND FITTINGS

1LITRE

ETHEPHON SOLUTION 0 1996

14409 0

1 TONNE

0 1997

14433 1

INFANT MILK SUBSTITUTES : PART 1 MILK PROTEIN BASED

20020401

0.18

72000

84000

20020401

0.3

41000

49000

20020401

0.12

41000

49000

20020401

1.6

29000

36000

20020401

43.2

108000

120000

20020401

14.4

26000

33000

100 M METERS

0 1998

14494

ELASTOMER INSULATED FLEXIBLE CABLE FOR USE IN MINES

1 KG.

THIOPHANATE METHYL WP 0 1998

14552 0

0 2000

14846 0

20020401

0.25

29000

36000

20020401

2.9

24000

30000

1VALVE ( SIZE

UPTO 300 MM)

SLUICE VALVES FOR WATER WORKS PURPOSES 0 2000

14846 0

20020401

14.4

24000

30000

1VALVE (SIZE 350

MM TO 1200 MM)

SLUICE VALVES FOR WATER-WORKS PURPOSES (350 ΤΟ 1200 MM SIZE) 9356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] IS.No PT. Sec. Year Product

UNIT

MIN. MARKING FEE Unit Enforcement Dute

Small

Large

Rate

12981 n

Scale Scale

1991 COMMON SALT IRON FORTIFIED DNE MT.

31000

25000

20020412 12102 0 0 1987 TAPER ROLLER BEARING

ONE BEARING

31000

25000

3841

0.25

20020413 1966

1KG

BETA CAROTENE - FOOD GRADE

36000

29000

20020430 14885 0 0 2001

1MT.

96000

84000

POLYETHYLENE PIPES FOR SUPPLY OF GASEOUS FUELS

80 20020701 7080

3 0 1992

1PIECE

31000

25000

15 20020722 MTP SUCTION APPARATUS: PART 3 ELECTRICALLY OPERATED

5204

1969 RESEARCH MICROSCOPE

1MICROSCOPE

36000

29000

3196

30 20020723 0 2001

1 CYLINDER

120000

84000

8.65 20020724 WELDED LOW CARBON STEEL CYLINDERS EXCEEDING 5 LITRE WATER CAPACITY FOR LOW PRESSURE LIQUIFIABLE GASES :PART 4 CYLINDERS FOR TOXIC AND CORROSIVE GASES

[F. No. CMD-IV: 13:10] BALWANT RAI , Dy. Director

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3143.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम (1 ) के खंड (ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद् द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों) की संख्या वर्ष औरशीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीयमानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

आईएस 397: 1972

31 12 2003 1. आईएस 397( भाग 1) :2003 उत्पादन के दौरान गुणता नियंत्रण की प्रणाली भाग 1 चरों के लिये नियंत्रण सारणी (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

आईएस 397:1987

31 12 2003 2. आईएस 397 (भाग 4):2003 उत्पादन के दौरान गुणता नियंत्रण की प्रणाली भाग 4 गुणों की विशेष नियंत्रण सारणी (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

आईएस 498: 1985

3009 2003 3. आईएस 498:2003 - वैक्युमपैन चीनी (रोपित श्वेत चीनी) का वर्गीकरण (पाँचवापुनरीक्षण) 9357 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(3)

(2)

01 09 2004 (1)

आईएस 1804:1996

4. आईएस 1804: 2004 इंस्पात के तार की रस्सियाँ- रेशा मुख्य कोर विशिष्टि (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

3103 2004

आईएस 3117:1965

5. आईएस 3117: 2004 सड़कों के लिए बिटुमेन पायस (ऋकयनीय टाइप) विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

31 10 2003

आईएस 3229: 1973

6. आईएस 3229:2003 नैपथीयनिक एसिड (सोडियम साल्ट)- विशिष्टि (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

3103 2004

आईएस 4163:1982

7. आईएस 4163: 2004 इस्पात - अधात्विक अंतर्विशन अंश ज्ञात करना - मानक आरेख प्रयुक्त माइक्रोग्राफिक पद्धति (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

31 12 2003

आईएस 4695 (भाग 1): 1988

8. आईएस 4695 (भाग 1): 2003 सामान्य उद्देश्य के लिए नक्कल चूड़ियाँ भाग 1 प्रोफाइल एवं नामिनल साइज (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

3110 2003

आईएस-5649:1983

9. आईएस 5649:2003 ओ-टोल्युडीन-विशिष्टि (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

31.03 2004 10. आईएस 6092(भाग 2/अनु. 3):2004 उर्वरकोंके नमूने लेना और परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 2 नाइट्रोजन ज्ञात करना अनुभाग 3 नाइट्रेट नाइट्रोजन अंश- ग्रेवीमापी नाइट्रॉन पद्धति

31-03-2004 11. आईएस 6092 ( भाग 2 /अनु. 4):2004 उर्वरकोंके नमूने लेना और परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 2 नाइट्रोजन ज्ञात करना अनुभाग 4 अमोनियाई नाइट्रोजन अंश- आसवन के बाद टाइट्रीमीट्रिक पद्धति

2902 2004 12. आईएस 6092(भाग 2 /अनु. 5):2004 उर्वरकोंके नमूने लेना और परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 2 नाइट्रोजन ज्ञात करना अनुभाग 5 कुल नाइट्रोजन अंश आसवन के बाद टाइट्रीमीट्रिक पद्धति

3530 GI/2004-10 9358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

2902 2004 13. आईएस 6092( भाग 2 /अनु. 6):2004 उर्वरकोंके नमूने लेना और परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 2 नाइट्रोजन ज्ञान करना अनुभाग 6 अमोनिया युक्त करने वाले अन्य परतों की उपस्थिति में उपचारित नाइट्रोजन ज्ञात करने पर टाइट्रीमीट्रिक पद्धति

31 03 2004 14. आईएस 6092( भाग 2 /अनु. 7):2004 उर्वरकोंके नमूने लेना और परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 2 नाइट्रोजन ज्ञात करना अनुभाग 7 ठोस उर्वरक- यूरिया नाइट्रोजन अंश ज्ञात करना - जैन्थीड्राल उपयोग करते हुए ग्रेवीमापी पद्धति

15. आईएस 7825: 2004

आईएस 7825 (भाग 1 और 2) : 1975

3103 2004 सिलिण्डर प्रकार का हस्त चालित लान मूवर

विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

16. आईएस 8688:2004

आईएस 8688 : 1988

3103 2004 पेयजल के लिए प्लास्टिक की बोतलें विशिष्टि (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

17. आईएस 88872004

आईएस 8887: 1995

30 11 2004 सड़कोंके लिए बिटुमेन पायस ( धनायनिक टाइप)

विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

18. आईएस 11677: 2004

आईएस 11677:1986

2902 2004 बेलनाकार स्थाई छिद्रों व गोलीय कॉर्नर्स के साथ परिवर्त्य कठोर धातु ( कार्बाइड ) के निवेश्य आयाम

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

19. आईएस 13346: 2004

आईएस 13346: 1992

2902 2004 विस्फोटी गैस पर्यावरणों के लिए बिजली के उपकरण - सामान्य अपेक्षाएँ (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

31 03 2004 20. आईएस/आईएसओ 14050: 2002 पर्यावरण प्रबंधन पारिभाषिक शब्दावली

2902 2004 21. आईएस 15091 ( भाग 2 ): 2004 कर्त्य औजारों के लिए परिवर्त्य निवेश्य गोलीय कॉर्नसै के साथ सिरेमिक निवेश्य भाग 2 बेलनाकार स्थाई छिद्रों के निवेश्यों के आयाम

31 12 2003 22. आईएस 15280: 2003 गुणताकार्य परिनियोजन 9359 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

3009 2003 23. आईएस 15351:2003

वस्त्रादि नहर के अस्तर के लिये परत चढ़ा उच्च घनव्त पोलीइथाइलीन (एच.डी.पी.ई. ) का कपड़ा विशिष्टि

3110 2003 24. आईएस 15412:2003 वस्त्रादिमशीनरी- कृत्रिम तंतु प्रक्रमण मशीनों के लिए सिरेमिक सूत्र नियामक- विशिष्टि

2902 2004 25. आईएस 15424(भाग 1 ):2004 दाब औजार - गाइड स्तम्भ भाग 1 टाइप

2902 2004 26. आईएस 15424 (भाग 2):2004 दाब औजार - गाइड स्तम्भ भाग 2 टाइप ए, सीधे स्तम्भ

29 02 2004 27. आईएस 15424( भाग 4):2004/ दाब औजार - गाइड स्तम्भ भाग 4 टाइप सी, टेपर लीड और बुश सहित स्तम्भ

3103 2004 28. आईएस 15425:2004 एब्रेसिव कण- कैपिलरी क्रिया का निर्धारण

31 03 2004 29. आईएस 15426:2004

इस्पात - डुप्लेक्स ग्रेन साइज की धातु चित्रित विशिष्टताएं तथा वितरण

3103 2004 30. आईएस 15438:2004 कोयला सल्फर के रूप ज्ञात करना

2902 2004 31. आईएस 15439:2002 ठोस कोयला आक्सीजन का अंश ज्ञात करना

31 03 2004 32. आईएस 15440:2004

कोयला- प्रत्यक्ष जले कोयला-तंत्र में गैसों द्वारा दुलाईकिये गए प्रचूर्णित कोयले के नमूने लेना

31032004 33. आईएस 15441 : 2004

ठोस खनिज ईंधन कार्बन और हाइड्रोजन ज्ञात करना- लाइबिग पद्धति 9360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

3103 2004 34. आईएस 15443:2004 ईमिडाक्लोप्रिड तकनीकी विशिष्टि

3103 2004 35. आईएस 15448( भाग 1): 2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग । फार्म

3103 2004 36. आईएस 15448 ( भाग 2) : 2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग 2 फार्म ए , ग्लाइडिंग बुश , सादा, टाइप 1

3103 2004 37. आईएस 15448( भाग 3 ): 2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग 3 फार्म बी, बाल केज बुश , सादा, टाइप 1

3103 2004 38. आईएस 15448( भाग 4): 2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग 4 फार्म सी, ग्लाइडिंग बुश, हैडिड, टाइप 1

31 03 2004 39: आईएस 15448( भाग 5 ):2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग 5 फार्म डी, बाल केज़ बुश, हैडिड, टाइप 1

3103 2004 40. आईएस 15448(भाग 6):2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग 6 फार्म ई , ग्लाइडिंग बुंश, फ्लैंज़ड, टाइप 1

3103 2004 41. आईएस 15448 ( भाग 7):2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग 7 फार्म एफ , बाल केज बुश, फ्लैंज़ड, टाइप 1

3103 2004 42. आईएस 15448 ( भाग 8 ):2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग 8 फार्म जी, ग्लाइडिंग बुंश, स्टैप्ड, टाइप 1

31 03 2004 43. आईएस 15448( भाग 9):2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग 9 फार्म बी, बाल केज बुश, सादे , टाइप 2

31 03 2004 44. आईएस 15448( भाग 10 ) :2004 दाब औजार - गाइड बुश भाग 10 फार्म ई, ग्लाइडिंग बुश, फ्लैंज़ड, टाइप 2

1-1 9361 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

3103 2004 45. आईएस 15448 ( भाग 11 ):2004

दाब औजार - गाइड बुश

भाग 11 फार्म एफ, बाल केज़ बुश , फ्लैंज़ड, टाइप 2

3103 2004 46. आईएस 15464:2004

स्वचल ईंधन में प्रयुक्त के लिए इन्हाईड्रस ईथनॉल

विशिष्टि

3105 2004 47. आईएस 15476:2004 बाँस की चटाई की नालीदार चादरें विशिष्टि

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली- 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[फा. सं. -सीएमडी 4 : 13 : 2 ] बलवंत राय , उप महानिदेशक

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2004

S. O. 3143. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

THE SCHEDULE

Date of Established SI.NO.

(4) &Title No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

No. & year of Indian Standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Standard (3)

(2)

(1)

31 12 2003

IS 397: 1972

1 IS 397 (Part 1) :2003 Methods for Statistical Quality Control During Production Part 1 Control Charts for Variables (SecondRevision)

31 12 2003

IS 397: 1987

2 IS 397 (Part 4): 2003 Methods for Statistical Quality Control During Production Part4 Special Control Charts By Attributes (FirstRevision)

3009 2003

IS498: 1985

3. IS498 : 2003 Grading for Vacuum Pan (Plantation White ) Sugar (Fifth Revision) 9362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

IS1804:1996

01 09 2004 IS 1804: 2004 Steel Wire Ropes - Fibre Main Cores Specification (FourthRevision)

IS 3117 : 1965

3103 2004

IS 3117 : 2004 Bitumen Emulsion For Roads and AlliedApplications (Anionic Type) - Specification (FirstRevision)

IS 3229: 1973

31 10 2003

IS 3229:2003 Naphthionic Acid ( Sodium Salt ) Specification (Second Revision )

7 IS 4163 :2004

IS 4163 :1982

31 03 2004

Steel- Determination of Content of Nonmetallic Inclusions - MicrographicMethod Using Standard Diagrams (Third Revision)

IS 4695(Part 1) : 1988

31 12 2003

IS 4695 (Part 1) : 2003 General Purpose Knuckle Threads Part 1 Profile and Nominal Sizes (Second Revision )

9 IS 5649 : 2003

IS 5649 :1983

31 10 2003

O- Toluidine - Specification (Second Revision)

31 03 2004

IS 6092 ( Part 2 / Sec 3 ) : 2004 Methodsof Sampling and Test for Fertilizers Part 2 Determination of Nitrogen Section 3 Nitrate Nitrogen Content - Nitron Gravimetric Method

31 03 2004

IS 6092( Part 2/ Sec 4): 2004 Methods of Sampling and Test for Fertilizers Part2 Determination of Nitrogen Section 4 Ammoniacal Nitrogen Content Titrimetric Method After Distillation

2902 2004

IS 6092( Part 2/ Sec 5 ) : 2004 Methods of Sampling and Test for Fertilizers Part 2 Determination of Nitrogen Section 5 Total Nitrogen Content - Titrimetric Method After Distillation

29 02 2004

IS 6092 ( Part 2 / Sec 6 ) : 2004 Methods of Sampling and Test For Fertilizers Part 2 Determination of Nitrogen Section 6 Ammoniacal Nitrogen Content in the Presence of Other Substances which Release Ammonia when Treated with Sodium Hydroxide - Titrimetric Method 9363 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(4) (2)

(1)

3103 2004 14 IS 6092 (Part 2/ Sec 7):2004 Methods of Sampling and Test ForFertilizers Part 2 Determination of Nitrogen Section 7 Solid Fertilizers - Determination of Urea Nitrogen Content -Gravimetric Method Using Xanthydrol

31 03 2004

IS 7825 (Part 1 and 2) : 1975

15 IS 7825: 2004 Cylinder Type Hand Lawn Mower - Specification (FirstRevision)

31 03 2004

IS8688 : 1988

16 IS 8688 : 2004 Specification for Plastics Potable WaterBottles (Second Revision )

31 03 2004

IS 8887: 1995

17 IS 8887: 2004 Bitumen Emulsion for Roads (Cationic Type) - Specification (Second Revision)

29 02 2004

IS 11677 : 1986

18 IS 11677 : 2004 Indexable Hardınetal (Carbide) Inserts with Rounded Corners , With Cylindrical Fixing Hole - Dimensions (FirstRevision)

2902 2004

IS13346: 1992

19 IS13346: 2004 Electrical Apparatus for Explosive GasAtmosphers - Genera Requirements (FirstRevision)

31 03 2004 20 IS/ISO 14050: 2002 Environmental Management - Vocabulary

29 02 2004 21. IS 15091 (Part 2) : 204 Indexable Inserts for Cutting Tools - Ceramic Inserts with Rounded Corners Part 2 Dimensions of Inserts with Cylindrical Fixing Hole

31 12 2003 22 IS 15280 : 2003 Quality Function Deployment 9364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] (1)

(3)

(4)

3009 2003 IS 15351: 2003 Textiles Laminated High Density Polyethylene (HDPE ) Fabric for Canal Lining Specification

31 10 2003 IS 15412 : 2003 Machinery Ceramic Thread Guides forMan-Made Fib re Processing Machines- Specification

2902 2004 IS 15424 (Part 1 ) : 2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Pillars Part1 Types

2902 2004 IS 15424 ( Part 2) :2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Pillars Part2 Type A, Straight Pillars

2902 2004 IS 15424 (Part 4): 2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Pillars Part4 Type C, Pillars with Taper Lead and Bush

3103-2004 IS 15425: 2004 Abrasive Grains - Determination of Capillarity

3103 2004 IS 15426: 2004 Steel Metallographic Characterization of Duples Grain Size and Distributions

3103 2004

IS 15438 : 2004 Coal Determination of Forms of Sulphur

2902 2004

IS 15439 : 2004 Hard Coal- Determination of OxygenContent

31 03 2004

IS 15440 : 2004 Coal- Sampling of Pulverized Coal Conveyed by Gases in Direct Fired CoalSystems

33 IS 15441 : 2004

31 03 2004

Solid Mineral Fuels - Determination ofCarbon and Hydrogen - Liebig Method

31 03 2004

IS 15443 : 2004 Imidacloprid Technical - Specification 936500

SAD

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926130

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

03103/2004 35 IS 15448 (Part 1 ) : 2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Bushes Part 1 Forms

31: 03:2004 36 IS 15448 (Part 2): 2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Bushes Part 2 Form A, Gliding Bushes , Plain, Type 1

31 03 2004 37 IS 15448 (Part 3) :2004 Tools for Pressing Guide Bushes Part 3 Form B, Ball Cage Bushes, Plain, Type for

3103 2004 38 IS. 15448 (Part 4); 2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Bushes Part 4 Form C, Gliding Bushes, Headed, Type 1

3103 2004 39

「何理解 CHE

το ταψιάς τις της ε IS 15448 (Part 5) :2004 Tools for Pressing Guide Bushes Part 5 Form D, Ball Cage Bushes, Headed, Type 1

3103 2004 40 IS 15448 (Part 6): 2004 Tools for Pressing Guide Bushes Part 6 Form E, Gliding Bushes, Flanged, Type 1

3103 2004 41

(my ) IS 15448 (Part 7) : 2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Bushes Part 7 Form F, Ball Cage Bushes , Flanged, Type 1

00:31:03 2004 FE 42 IS 15448 (Part 8 ):2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Bushes Part 8 FormG, Gliding Bushes , Stepped, Type 1

5000 201

31.03 2004 43 IS 15448 (Part 9 ) : 2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Bushes Part 9 Form B , Ball Cage Bushes , Plain , Type 2

3103 2004 44 IS 15448 (Part 10) : 2004 Tools for Pressing - Guide Bushes Part 10 Form E, Gliding Bushes , Flanged, Type 2

3103 2004 45 IS 15448 (Part 11 ): 2004 Toolsfor Pressing - Guide Bushes Part 11 Form F, Ball Cage Bushcs, Flanged, Type 2

3530 GI/2004-11 9366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

-(+)

31 03 2004 IS 15464 : 2004 Anhydrous Ethanol for Use in Automotive Fuel - Specification

31 03 2004 IS 15476: 2004 Bamboo Mat Corrugated Sheets - Specification

Copy of these Indian Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards. Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi 110002 and Regional Office : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore. Bhopal. Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patan , Pune, Thiruvanantkapuram.

[ F. No. CMD- IV: 13 :2 ] BALWANT RAI , Dy. Director

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3144.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद् द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं: -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक(कों) की संख्या वर्ष औरशीर्षक

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1 .

आईएस 188: 1980

30 06 2004 आइएस 188: 2004 वस्त्रादि- सूती पाप्लिन विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण )

आइएस 1056: 1993

30062004 आइएस 1056: 2004 व्यावसायिक बाट विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

आईएस 1057: 1993

3006 2004

आइएस 1057: 2004 व्यावसायिक कैरेट बाट विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

आईएस 1239 ( भाग 1 ) : 1990

30 11 2004

आइएस 1239(भाग 1):2004 इस्पात की नलियाँ, नलिकाकार सार्माग्रयाँ तथा इस्पात की अन्य फिटिंग विशिष्टि भाग । इस्पात की नलियाँ (छठा पुनरीक्षण)

आईएस 1448(पी: 55 ) : 1963

31 05 2004

आईएस 1448( पी: 55/वर्ग 1 ) : 2004 पेट्रोलियम और उसके उत्पादकों की परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ [पी: 55/वर्ग 1 ] पेट्रोलियम उत्पादकों का साबुनीकरणी मान का निर्धारण (पहन्ना पुनरीक्षण) 9367 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

3105 2004

आईएस 1448( पी: 55 ) : 1963

6. आईएस 1448(पी: 55/ वर्ग 2 ) : 2004 पेट्रोलियम और उसके उत्पादकों की परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ [पी: 55/वर्ग 2 ] तेल. वसा और मोम में साबुनीकरणीय और असाबुनीकरणीय पदार्थ का निर्धारण (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

30062004 7. आईएसय 1448 ( पी: 149) : 2004 पेट्रोलियम और उसके उत्पादकों की परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ [पी: 149] डीजल ईंधन - उच्च आवृति प्रत्यागामी रिंग (एच.एफ. आर.आर. ) का प्रयोग करते हुए स्नेहन का मूल्यांकन करना परीक्षण पद्धत

2902 2004

आइएस 2888: 1983

8 आईएस 2888: 2004 प्रसाधन साबुन- विशिष्टि (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण )

3006 2004 9. आईएस 3025(भाग 2 ): 2004 जल और अपशिष्ट जल के नमूने लेने तथा परीक्षण ( भौतिक एवं रासार्यानक की पद्धतियाँ भाग 2 प्रेरण युग्मित प्लाज्मा आण्विक उत्सर्जन स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी द्वारा 33 तत्व ज्ञात करना

30.06 2004 10. आईएस 5960( भाग 16):2004 माँस और मॉस उत्पाद परीक्षण पद्धति भाग 16 कुल फासफोरस की मात्रा ज्ञात करना - स्पैक्ट्रोमीट्रिक विधि

3006 2004 11. आईएस 5960( भाग 17 ): 2004 माँस और मॉस उत्पाद- परीक्षण पद्धति भाग 17स्टार्च और ग्लूकोज़ की मात्रा ज्ञात एन्ज़ाईट्रिक विधि करना

3006 2004 12. आईएस 6092 ( भाग 3/खड 3 ): 2004/ आईएसओ 5316: 1977 उर्वरकों के नमूने लेना ओर परीक्षण पद्धतयाँ भाग 3 फासफारस ज्ञात करना खंड 3 विलंय फोसफेट्स का निष्कर्षण 9368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 13.

3006 2004 आइएस 6092 ( भाग 3/खड 4): 2004/ आईएसओ6598 :1985 उर्वरकों के नमूने लेना और परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 3 फासफोरस ज्ञात करना खंड 4क्यूनोलीन फोसफोमोलीवडेट ग्रेवीमाप पति

14.

30 06 2004 आईएस6092(भाग 3/खड 5): 2004/ आईएसओ 7497: 1984 उर्वरकों के नमूने लेना और परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 3 फासफोरस ज्ञात करना खंड 4 निज अम्ल में फासफोरस विलेय कानिष्कर्षण

15.

आईएस 7285: 1988

31 12 2004 आईएस 7285( भाग 1 ):2004 फिर से भरे जा सकने वाले जोड रहित इस्पात के गैस सिलेन्डर - विशिष्ट भाग 1 प्रसामान्यीकृत इस्पात सिलेन्डर (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

16.

आईएस 7285 : 1988

31 122004 आईएस 7285( भाग 2):2004 फिर से भरे जा सकने वाले जोड रहित इस्पात के गैस सिलेन्डर विशिष्ट भाग 2 1100 एमपीए ( 112 केजीएफ/ वर्गएमएम ) से कम की नन्यता सामथ्य वाले इस्पात के क्वेंच्ड और टैम्पर सिलेन्डर (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

17.

आईएस 7389: 1974

3006 2004 आइएस 7389:2004 विस्फाटी गैस पर्यावरणों के लिए बिजली के उपकरण दाबित आवेष्टन " p" (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

18.

आईएस 7693: 1975

30 042004 आईएस 7693 : 2004 विस्फोटक गैस वातावरण के लिए विद्युत के उपकरण तेल निमज्जन " 0 " (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

19.

आइएस 7724:1975

30 06 2004 आईाग्स 7724: 2004 विस्फोटक गैस वातावरण के लिए विद्युत के उपकरण - पाउडर भर्भारत " q" (पहला पुनरीक्षण) 6986330

Энт

भारत का रामपत्र दिसम्बर 11, 2004/अग्रहायण 201926AD

[भाग II खण्ड 3(ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30.0430.0 2004

आइएस 7795: 197581100

20. आईएस 7795: 2004 कॉलर संहित षटकोणी ढिबरियाँ विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

:05 2004

आईएस 7820: 197531

21. आईएस 7820:2004 विस्फोटक गैस वातारण के लिए विद्युत उपकरण - प्रज्वलन तापमान की परीक्षण पद्धति ( पहला पुनरीक्षण

witnissima-14558563-POR

30:06 2004

आईएस 83301986

22. आईएस 8330 : 2004 सर्वेक्षण यंत्रों के लिए त्रिपादी - स्थिर पाद किस्म- विशिष्टि (दूसरा पुंनरीक्षण)

30.06 2004

आईएस 9026: 1978 me

23. आईएस 9026: 2004 लम्बे छेद के वेधन उपस्करों की अपधायक चूड़ीदार रस्सी- विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

3006 2004

आईएस 11021: 1984

24. आईएस 11021 : 2004 खाद्य पदार्थ में डाईमेथोएट के अंश ज्ञात करने कीविर्वाध (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

198930,06 2004

आईएस 12641 :

25. आईएस 12641: 2004 अर्द्धचालक युक्तियाँ- यांत्रिक एवं पर्यावरण कार्यावधियाँ (प्रहला पुनरीक्षण )

2001-701801 SE

30.06 2004 26.

ही कि उजाडोमा 120004 તુવિનાદિન415081?1As HAHHAHRide

आईएस 13360( भाग 5/खंड 26 ) : 2004 प्लास्टिक परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 5 यांत्रिक गुणधर्म खंड26 तनन गुणधर्म ज्ञात करना एदिशात्मक फाईबर प्रबलित प्लास्टिक संमिश्र कीपरीक्षण पद्धतियाँ

आई010810-4-3001

30.06.2004 आईएस 13360( भाग 6/खंड 11 ) : 2004/ आईएसओ 974:2000 प्लास्टिक परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 6 तापीय गुणधर्म खंड 11 भंगुरता तापमान संघट् के द्वारा ज्ञात करना । 9370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 28.

3006 2004 आईएस 13360 ( भाग 8/ खंड 13 ): 2004 प्लास्टिक परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 8 स्थायित्व/ रसायनिक गुणधर्म खंड 13 काँच के नीचे दिन की रोशनी में रखने के पश्चातरंग में बदलाव और गुणधमों में परिवर्तन ज्ञात करना

29.

30 1-1 2004

आईएस 13947 (भाग 5 /खंड 1 ): 1993

आइएस 13947(भाग 5/खंड 1 ): 2004 अल्प-वोल्टता स्विचगियर एवं नियंत्रणगियर- विशिष्टि भाग 5नियंत्रण परिपथ युक्तियाँ एवं स्विचिंग तत्व खंड 1 विद्युत-यांत्रिक नियंत्रण सर्किट युक्तियाँ। (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

30. आईएस 13947 ( भाग 5/खंड 2): 2004 अल्प-वोल्टता स्विचगियर एवं नियंत्रणगियर - विशिष्टि भाग 5 नियंत्रण परिपथ युक्तियाँ एवं स्विचिंगतत्व खंड 2 प्राक्सिमिटी स्विच

30 06 2004 (Lastday of themonth) Notunder certification 31.

3006 2004 आईएस 14817 ( भाग 2 ):2004/ आईएसओ 10816-2: 1996 यांत्रिक कंपन - अघूर्णी हिस्सों पर मापन द्वारा मशीन कंपन का मूल्यांकन

भाग 250 कि.वा. से अधिक बड़े भूमि आधारित भाप टरबाईन जेनरेटर

32.

3006 2004 आईएस 14817 ( भाग 3 ): 2004/ आईएसओ 10816-3 : 1998 यांत्रिक कंपन अघूर्णी हिस्सों पर मापन द्वारा मशीन कंपन का मूल्यांकन

भाग 3 15 कि.वा. से अधिक की अभिहित पावर तथा अभिहित गति 120 च.प्र.मि. एवं 15000 च.प्र.मि. के बीच वाली औद्योगिक मशीने स्वस्थाने में मापित

33.

3006 2004 आईएस 14817( भाग 4):2004/ आईएसओ 10816-4:2004 यांत्रिक कंपन अघूर्णी हिस्सों पर मापन द्वारा मशीन कंपन का मूल्यांकन भाग 4 विमान व्यूत्पन्न को छोड़कर गैस टरबाईन चालन सैट 9371 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

3006 2004 (1)

34. आईएस 14817(भाग 5):2004/ आईएसओ 10816-5: 2000 यांत्रिक कंपन अघूर्णी हिस्सों पर मापन द्वारा मशीन कंपन का मूल्यांकन भाग 5 द्रव चालित पावर जेनरेटिंग/पम्पिंग और पम्पिंगप्लांट

30-06 2004 35. आईएस 14817( भाग 6):2004/ आईएसओ 10816-6: 1995 यांत्रिक कंपन अघूर्णी हिस्सों पर मापन द्वारा मशीन कंपन का मूल्यांकन भाग 6 100 कि.वा. से अधिक की पावर रेटिंग वाली प्रत्यागामी मशीनें

3006 2004 36. आईएस 15104(भाग 6 ):2004/ आईएसओ8442-6: 2000 खाद्य पदार्थों के सम्पर्क में आने वालीसामग्री और वस्तुएं छुरी काँटे और टेबल होलोवेयर भाग 6 लैकर द्वारा संरक्षित चाँदी की हल्की परत चढे बर्तन

3105 2004 37. आईएस 15104(भाग 7): 2004/ आईएसओ 8442-7:2000 खाद्य पदार्थों के सम्पर्क में आने वाली सामग्री और वस्तुएं छुरी काँटे और टेबल होलोवेयर भाग 7 चाँदी , अन्य मूल्यवान धातुओं और उनकी मिश्रधातुओं से बनी छुरी काँटो की अपेक्षाएं

3105 2004 38. आईएस 15104( भाग 8): 2004/ आईएसओ 8442-8: 2000 खाद्य पदार्थो के सम्पर्क में आने वाली सामग्री और वस्तुएं छुरी काँटे और टेबल होलोवेयर भाग 8 मेज और सजावट के लिए चाँदी के बर्तनों की अपेक्षाएं

30 062004 39. आईएस 15333 : 2004 मिट्टी तेल का गैस चूल्हा- विशिष्टि

3006 2004 40. आईएस 15424(भाग 3): 2004/ आईएसओ 9128-3: 1992 दाब औजार- गाइड स्तम्भ भाग 3 टाइप बी, सिरा-लॉकिंग स्तम्भ 9372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II SEC. 3 (ii )] (1)

(2)

41.

00002-1180130 06 2004 आईएस 15424 ( भाग 5): 2004/ आईएसओ 9128-5: 1992 दाब औजार- गाइड स्तम्भ भाग 5 टाइप डी, सिरा- फ्लैंज सहित लॉकिंग स्तम्भ

42.

400010831:05 2004

20010-21801 serреnе आईएस 15427: 2004 सामान्य सामग्री को उठाने चढ़ाने के लिए इलैस्टोमरी और इस्पात डोरी संरचना के वाहक पट्टे-विशिष्टि

43.

30.06.200.06 2004 आइएस 15429: 2004 डीसी मोटरों के भंडारण , संस्थापन और रख रखाव रीति संहिता

44.

31-05 2004 आईएस 15442 : 2004 जल संसाधन परियोजनाओं के पर्यावरण पर प्रभाव की मूल्यांकन की मानदंड

45.

30062004 आईएस 15446 ( भाग 4) : 2004 उत्पादन नियंत्रण की मार्गदर्शिका भाग 4 प्रेक्षण (शॉप-फ्लोर नियंत्रण)

900

46.

she

31.05.2004 आईएस 15447 ( भाग 1 ) : 2004 व्यापारिक वात्या विस्फोटक विशिष्टि भाग । नाईट्रोग्लिसरीन आधारित विस्फोटक

30062004 आईएस 15451 : 2004 विस्फोटी गैस पर्यावरणों के लिए बिजली के उपकरण - सम्पुटन " m"

48.

30062004 आईएस 15460( भाग 1 ): 2004/ आईएसओ 5565-1: 1999 वैनीला [ वैनीला फ्रेगरेंस ( सेलिसबरी ) एम्स ] भाग । विशिष्टि

49.

30 06 2004 आईएस 15460( भाग 2 ): 2004/ आईएसओ 5565-2: 1999 वैनीला [ वैनीला फ्रेगरेंस ( सेलिसबरी ) एम्स ] भाग 2 परिक्षण विधि 9373 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926-

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30062004 50. आईएस 15463: 2004 माँस और माँस उत्पाद इसचिरिचिया कोलाई की गणना - कोलोनी-गणना तकनीक44 ° से. पर झिल्ली का प्रयोग करते हुए

3006 2004 51. आईएस 15471:2004/ आईएसओ 8541:1987 वायु आकाशीय - सेल्फ लॉकिंग नट, अधिकतम प्रचालन तापमान 425 डिग्री से. प्रापण विशिष्टि

30062004 52 आईएस 15478(भाग 2 ):2004/ आईएसओ 3100-2: 1988 माँस और माँस उत्पाद नमूना लेना एवं टेस्ट नमूने तैयार करना भाग 2 सूक्ष्म जैविक परीक्षण के लिए टेस्ट नमूने तैयार करना

30062004 53. आईएस 15479:2004 उच्च घनत्व अंतरसंयोजक स्तरों या बोडों की योग्यता और निष्पादन की विशिष्टि

3006 2004 54. आईएस 15480 (भाग 10 ): 2004 प्रकाशिक तंतु तनूकारी भाग 1 सामान्यविशिष्टि

3006 2004 55. आईएस 15481 (भाग 1 ):2004/ आईएसओ 10097-1: 1999 वायरलाईन हीरक क्रोड वेधन उपस्कर पद्धति ए भाग 1 मीटरी इकाइयाँ

3006 2004 56. आईएस 15482:2004 वाणी संचार के लिए माइक्रोफोन एवं ईअरफोन

3107 2004 57. आईएस 15483 ( भाग 1 ): 2004/ आईएसओ 12858-1 : 1999 प्रकाशिकी और प्रकाशीय यंत्र अल्पान्तरीय यंत्रों के लिए सहायक साधन भाग । अपरिवर्ती

3530 GI/2004-12 9374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)) (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 58.

31.07 2004 आईएस 15484 :2004/ आईएसओ 9767:1990 फोटोग्राफी - शिरोपरि प्रोजेक्टर कार्यकारिता लक्षणों को रिपोर्ट करने और मापन की पद्धतियाँ

59.

31 12 2004 आईएस 15490: 2004 वाहनों के लिए ईंधन के रूप में संपीडित प्राकृतिक गैस के ऑन- बोर्ड भंडारण के लिए सिलेन्डर - विशिष्टि

60.

30 06 2004 आईएस 15492(भाग 1 ):2004 वाटर पाकोंमें सुरक्षा की अनुशंसित रीतियों कीसहिता भाग । सामान्यसूचना

61.

30.06 2004 आईएस 15492( भाग 2): 2004 वाटर पार्को में सुरक्षा की अनुशंसित रीतियों कीसहिता भाग 2 सुरक्षा अपेक्षाएं

62.

3006 2004 आईएस 15492(भाग 3 ) :2004 वाटर पाकों में सुरक्षा की अनुसित रीतियों कीसहिता भाग 3 निर्देश

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, कोलकाता तथा मुम्बई और शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बत्तूर, फरीदाबाद , गाजियाबाद , गुवहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , लखनऊ, नागपुर , पटना, पूणे, राजकोट, तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[का. सं. सीएमडी 4 : 13: 2 ] बलवंत राय , उप महानिदेशक

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2004

S. O. 3144. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rules (1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

THE SCHEDULE

SI.NO.

Date of Established No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established & Title

No. & year of Indian Standards , if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

IS 188: 1980

3006 2004 IS 188 : 2004 Textiles - Cotton Poplin - Specification (Third Revision) 9375 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

30.06 2004

IS 1056: 1993

2 IS 1056: 2004 Commercial Weights - Specification (Third Revision)

30-06 2004

IS 1057: 1993

3 IS 1057 : 2004. Commercial Carat Weights - Specification (Third Revision)

30 11 2004

IS 1239 (Part 1 ) 1990

4 IS 1239(Part 1 ): 2004 Steel Tubes , Tubulars and other Wrought Steel Fittings - Specification Part 1 Steel Tubes (SixthRevision)

31 05 2004

IS 1448 (P: 55) :1963

5 IS 1448 [P: 55 / Sec 1 ] : 2004 Methods of Test for Petroleum and its Products [ P: 55 /Section1 ] Determination of saponification value of petroleum products (FirstRevision)

31:05 2004

IS 1448 (P: 55 ) : 1963

30.06 2004 IS 1448 [P: 55 / Sec 2 ] :2004 Methods of Test for Petroleum and its Products [ P: 55 / Section2] Saponifiable and Unsaponifiable Matter in Oil Fatand Waxes (First Revision)

alts

29 02 2004 IS 1448 [P: 149 ]: 2004 Methods of Test for Petroleum and its Products [ 149 ] Diesel Fuel - Assessment of Lubricity using the High- Frequency Reciprocating Ring (HFRR) - Test Method

IS : 2888 : 1983

8 IS 2888 : 2004 Toilet Soap - Specification (Third Revision)

κλαδη30.06 2004 9 IS 3025 (Part 2): 2004 Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for Water and Waste Water Part 2 Determination of 33 Elements by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy 9376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA20, 1926. [PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 10

3006 2004 IS 5960 (Part 16):2004 Meat and Meat Products - Methods of Test Part 16 Determination of Total Phosphorus Content - Spectrometric Method

30 06 2004 IS 5960 (Part 17) : 2004 Meat and Meat Products - Methods of Test Part 17 Determination of Starch and Glucose Content - Enzymatic Method

3006 2004 12 IS 6092 (Part 3 /Sec 3 ) : 2004 ISO 5316 : 1977 Methods of Sampling and Test forFertilizers Part3 Determination of Phosphorus Section 3 Extraction of Water- Soluble Phosphates

3006 2004 IS 6092 (Part 3 / Sec 4) : 2004 ISO 6598 : 1985 Methods of Sampling and Test forFertilizers Part 3 Determination of Phosphorus Section 4 Quinoline Phosphomolybdate Gravimetric Method

3006.2004 IS 6092 (Part 3/ Sec 5) : 2004 ISO 7497 : 1984-

Methods of Sampling and Test forFertilizers Part 3 Determination of Phosphorus Section 5 Extraction of Phosphates Soluble in Mineral Acids

IS 7285 : 1988

31 12 2004 IS 7285 (Part 1 ) : 2004 Refillable Seamless Steel Gas Cylinders- Specification Part 1 Normalized Steel Cylinders (Third Revision ) 9377 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31 12 2004

IS 7285:1988

16 IS 7285 (Part 2):2004 Refillable Seamless Steel Cylinders- Specification Part 2 Quenched and Tempered Steel Cylinders with Tensile Strength Less Than 1 100 Mpa (112kgf/mm 2) (Third Revision)

3006 2004

IS 7389 : 1974

17 IS 7389:2004 Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres - Pressurized Enclosures "p " (FirstRevision)

3004 2004

IS 7693: 1975

18 IS 7693 :2004 Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres - Oil- Immersion " o" (First Revision)

3006 2004

IS 7724: 1975

19 IS 7724: 2004 Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres Powder Filling " q " (FirstRevision)

3004 2004

IS 7795: 1975

20 IS 7795: 2004 Hexagon Nuts with Collar Specification (First Revision)

3105 2004

IS 7820 : 1975

21 IS 7820: 2004 Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres - Method of Test for Ignition Temperature (First Revision)

3006.2004

IS 8330: 1986

22 IS 8330:2004 Tripods for Surverying Instruments - Fixed Leg Type Specification (Second Revision)

3006.2004

IS 9026: 1978

23 IS 9026:2004 RopeThreaded Percussive Long-Hole Drilling Equipments - Specification (First Revision) 9378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II SBC. 3(ii)] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 24

IS 11021 : 1984

30 062004 IS 11021 :2004 Methods for Determination ofDimethoate Residues in Food Commodities (FirstRevision)

IS 12641 : 1989

30 06 2004 IS 12641: 2004 Semiconductor Devices-Mechanical and Climatic Test Methods (FirstRevision)

30062004 IS 13360 (Part 5/Sec 26) :2004 Plastics-Methods of Testing Part 5 Mechanical Properties Section 26 Determination of Tensile Properties - Test Conditions for Unidirectional Fibre- Reinforced Plastic Composities

30 062004 IS 13360 (Part 6/ Sec 11 ) : 2004 ISO 974: 2000 Plastics -Methods of Testing Part 6 Thermal Properties Section 11 Determination of the Brittleness Temperature by Impact

30 06 2004 IS 13360 (Part 8 /Sec 13 ) : 2004 Plastics -Methods of Testing Part 8 Permanence/Chemical Properties Section 13 Determination of Changes in Colour and Variations in Properties After Exposure to Daylight Under Glass , Natural Weathering or Laboratory Light Sources

30 11 2004

IS 13947 (Part 5/ Sec 1) : 1993

IS 13947 (Part 5/ Sec 1) : 2004 Low- voltage Switchgear and Controlgear - Specification Part 5 Control Circuit Devices and Switching Elements Section 1 Electromechanical Control Circuit Devices (FirstRevision) 937.0 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(2)

(1)

3006-2004 30

Not under certification date to be decided IS 13947 (Part 5/Sec 2): 2004 Low-Voltage Switchgear and Controlgear Specification Part5 Control Circuit Devices and Switching Elements Section 2 Proximity Switches (FirstRevision)

30 06 2004 31 IS 14817 (Part 2) : 2004 ISO 10816-2 : 1996 Mechanical Vibration - Evaluation of Machine Vibration By Measurements on Non-Rotating Parts Part 2 Large Land-Based Steam Turbine Generator Sets inExcess of 50 MW

30 06 2004 32 IS 14817 (Part 3) : 2004 ISO 10816-3 : 1998 Mechanical Vibration - Evaluation of Machine Vibration by Measurements on Non-Rotating Parts Part 3 Industrial Machines with Nominal Power Above 15 kW and Nominal Speeds Between 120 rpm and 15 000 rpm When Measured in Situ

30 06 2004 33 IS 14817 (Part 4): 2004 ISO10816-4: 2004 Mechanical Vibration - Evaluation of Machine Vibration by Measurements on Non- Rotating Parts Part 4 Gas Turbines Driven Sets Excluding Aircraft Derivatives

su.wallali sios't be ula 9380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

3006 2004 IS 14817 (Part 5) :2004 ISO 10816-5:2000 Mechanical Vibration - Evaluation of Machine Vibration by Measurements on Non-Rotating Parts Part 5 Machine Sets in Hydrualic Power Generating/Pumping and PumpingPlants

3006 2004 IS 14817 (Part 6) :2004 ISO 10816-6 : 1995 Mechanical Vibration Evaluation of Machine Vibration by Measurements on Non-Rotating Parts Part 6 Reciprocating Machines with Power Rating above 100 kW

3006 2004 IS 15104(Part 6) : 2004 ISO 8442-6:2000 Materials and Articles in Contact with Foodstuffs - Cutlery and Table Holloware Part 6 Lightly Silver - Plated Table Holloware Protected by Lacquer

3105 2004 IS 15104(Part 7) :2004 ISO 8442-7 : 2000 Materials and Articles in Contact with Foodstuffs - Cutlery and Table Holloware Part 7 Requirements for Table CutleryMade of Silver, other Precious Metals and Their Alloys

3105 2004 IS 15104(Part 8): 2004 ISO 8442-8 : 2000 Materials and Articles in Contact with Foodstuffs - Cutlery and Table Holloware Part 8 Requirements for Silver Table and Decorative Holloware 9381 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

/ 30 06 2004 39 IS 15333 : 2004 Kero-Gas Stove Specification

3006 2004 40 IS 15424(Part 3 )2004 ISO 9128-3 : 1992 Tools for Pressing -Guide Pillars Part 3 Type B, End-Locking Pillars

-3006 2004 41 IS 15424(Part 5):2004 ISO 9182-5 : 1992 Tools for Pressing - Guide Pillars Part 5 Type D, End -Locking Pillars with Flange

31 05 2004 42 IS 15427:2004 Conveyor Belting of Elastomeric and Steel Cord Construction for General Material Handling - Specification

3006 2004 43 IS 15429:2004 Storage, Installation and Maintenance of DC Motors Code of Practice

3105 2004 44 IS 15442: 2004 Parameters for Environmental Impact Assessment of Water Resources Projects

3006 2004 45 IS 15446(Part 4): 2004 Guide to Production Control Part 4 Dispatching (Shop- Floor Control)

3105 2004 46 IS 15447(Part 1 ):2004 Commercial Blasting Explosives - Specification Part 1 Nitroglycerine Based Explosives

30 06 2004 47 IS 15451:2004 Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres Encapsulation "m"

3530 GI/ 2004-13 9382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] (1)

(2)

(3 )

(4) 48

30 06 2004 IS 15460 (Part 1 ) : 2004 ISO 5565-1 : 1999 Vanilla [Vanilla Fragrans (Salisbury) Ames] Part 1 Specification

3006 2004 IS 15460(Part 2): 2004 ISO 5565-2: 1999 Vanilla Vanilla Fragrans (Salisbury) Ames ] Part 2 Test Methods

3006 2004 IS 15463: 2004 Meatand Meat Products - Enumeration of Escherichia Coli Colony- Count Technique At 44 C using Membranes

3006 2004 51 IS 15471:2004 ISO 8641 : 1987 Aerospace - Self-Locking Nuts withMaximum Operating Temperature Greater Than 425 C- Procurement Specification

3006 2004 IS 15478 ( Part 2 ): 2004 ISO 3100-2 : 1988 Meat and Meat Products - Sampling and Preparation of Test Samples Part 2 Preparation of Test Samples for Microbiological Examination

3006 2004 53 IS 15479 : 2004 Qualification and Performance Specification for High Density Interconnect ( HDI ) Layers or Boards

30 06 2004 IS 15480( Part 1 ): 2004 Fibre Optic Attenuators Part 1Generic Specification

3006 2004 IS 15481 ( Part 1 ) : 2004 ISO 10097-1 : 1999 Wireline Diamond Core Drilling Equipment - System A Part 1 Metric Units 9383 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11, 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

3006 2004 56 IS 15482 : 2004 Microphones and Earphones for Speech Communications

31 07 2004 57 IS 15483 (Part 1) : 2004 ISO 12858-1 : 1999 Optics and Optical Instruments Ancillary Devices for Geodetic Instruments Part 1 Invar Levelling Staffs

3107 2004 :

58 IS 15484: 2004 ISO 9767 : 1990 Photography- Overhead Projectors Methods for Measuring and Reporting Performance Characteristics

31 12 2004 59 IS 15490: 2004 Cylinders for On-Board Storage ofCompressed, Natural Gas as a Fuelfor Automotive Vehicles - Specification

30 06 2004 60 IS 15492 (Part 1 ): 2004 Codeof Recommended Practice for Safety in Water Parks Part 1 General Information

30 06 2004 61 IS 15492 (Part 2) :2004 Code of Recommended Practice for Safety in Water Parks Part 2 Safety Requirements

3006 2004 62 IS 15492 (Part 3 ): 2004 Code of Recommended Practice for Safety in Water Parks Part 3 Instructions

Copy of these Indian Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi 110002 and Regional Office: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patan, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[ F. No. CMD -IV: 13 :2] BALWANT RAI , Dy. Director 9384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) )

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 3 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3145.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री आर.वी. सरवेया, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, जिमखाना बिल्डिंग , आदिपुर रोड , अन्जार , कच्छ, 370110 , गुजरात , को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तालूका : राधनपुर

जिला: पाटण

राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं. गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

उप खण्ड सं.

हेक्टेयर

एवर वर्ग मीटर 1

7 चलवाडा

102

112

103

111

पी1

111

पी2

110

107

128

117

128

126

152

153

20 9385

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

-3- राज्य : गुजरात

जिला: पाटण

तालूका : राधनपुर

खसरा सं.

गाँव का बाम

क्रम सं.

3 2

228 बंधवड

218

219

228

219

220

219

220

221

225

222

224

235

234

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 234/पी 1 और

2अ/पी2 के बीच मे

एन.एच. 15 खसरा संख्या 6 और 77 के

बीच मे

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 74/1 और 73 के

बीच मे

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं.

वर्ग मीटर

एवर

हेक्टेवर

पी 2

1/पी 2

1/पी 1

1/1

1/2

1/पी 1

पी 1

अ/पी 2

1/पी 2

1/पी 1

3/पी 1

1पी

T 9386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

-4- तालूका : राधनपुर

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )]

जिला: पाटण

क्रम सं. गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 62 और 40/पी 2 के

2 बंधवड(जारी ... )

बीच मे

रास्ताखसरा संख्या 43/ पी 2 और

59/पी 2 के बीच मे

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 49/3 और

सुल्तानपुरा गाम सीमा के बीच मे

3 सुल्तानपुरा

रास्ताखसरा संख्या 13/1 और 92/1

के बीच मे

सडक 102

103

104

राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं.

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

पी 2

पी2

68 पी 2

पी1

60 2/पी 1

وه

38 3

44 1

पी

50 1

1/1

89 1

08 1

पी2

पी 1

पी 2

1और 2

3/पी1 और 3/पी 2

1पी3

02 2

1पी1

28 1पी 2

84 9387

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य: गुजरात

जिला: पाटण

तालूका : राधनपुर

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

3 2

105 सुल्तानपुरा (जारा ... )

105

सडक 56

169 4 सुबापुरा

169

170

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 170 और 171/1 पी1 के बीच मे

171

156

148

147

146

140

139

138

115

117+118

119

109

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं.

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

-04

1पी 1

पी 2

1पी 1

2/2पी 2

2/1

2/2पी 2

1/2

पी 2

पी 1

2/2

2/1

1/3

जा ... 5 9388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] 4

सुबापुरा (जारी ... )

2/2पी 2

2/1पी 1

101

[ फ्त्र. सं. आर-31015/39/2004-ओ.आर-11 ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 3rd December, 2004

S. O. 3145.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra ( Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein,

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule inay , within twenty- one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.V. Sarvaiya , Competent Authority, Mundra- Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited ) , Gymkhana Building , Adipur Road , Anjar , Kutch 370110 (Gujarat).

Contd.

9389 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

State : GUJARAT

District : PATAN

Taluk : RADHANPUR

Area

Surveyno.

Are SquareMetre

Sub-Division No.

Hectare

Name of Village

102

۱۰ CHALWADA

112

103

111

110

107

128

117

128

126

152

153

228

2. BANDHWAD

218

1/P2

219

228

1/P1

219

1/1

220

219

1/2

220

221

225

222

224

1/P1

235

234

Carttrack In between Survey number.234/P1 and 2A/P2

A/P2

1/P2

1/P1

3P1

3530 GI/2004-14 9390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

Taluk : RADHANPUR

District : PATAN

Name of Village

Survey no. 2. BANDHWAD NH.15 In between Survey number. 6 & 77

(Contd...)

Carttrackin between Survey number.74/1 and 73

Carttrack Inbetween Survey number.62 and 40/P2

Carttrack inbetween Survey number.43 /P2 and 59 /P2

Carttrack In between Survey number.49/3 and Village Boundary of Sultanpura

3. SULTANPURA

Carttrack In between Survey number. 13/1 and 92/1

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ] State : GUJARAT

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare

Are

Square Metre 0

08 0

48 0

93 1

80 0

59 0

71 1

68 2

09 0 .

86 0

55 P2

20 P2

29 P2

08 0

68 P2

89 P1

55 0

60 2P1

09 1

38 3

83 0

44 1

07 P

50 1

09 1/1

89 1

91 0

08 1

03 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9391 State : GUJARAT

District: PATAN Taluk : RADHANPUR

Surveyno.

Name of Village

94 3. SULTANPURA (Contd...)

Area

Are Square Metre Hectare

Sub-Division No.

1&2

3P1&3P2

Asphalted road 102

103

104

105

Asphalted road

169 4. SUBAPURA

169

170

Carttrack in in between Survey number.170 and 171 /1P1

171

156

148

147

146

140

139

138

115

117+118

119

109

1P3

1P1

1P2

1P1

2/2P2

2/1

2/2P2

1/2

2/2

2/1

1/3

0 9392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II- SEC. 3( ii) ] Taluk : RADHANPUR

District : PATAN

State : GUJARAT

Area

Nameof Viliage

Survey no.

Sub-Division No.

Hectare

Are

Square Metre SUBAPURA

2/2P2

18 (Contd...)

2/1P1

101

[No. R- 31015/39/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secу.

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3146. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

370110 , गुजरात, को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री आर.वी. सरवैया ,सक्षम प्राधिकारी, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, जिमखाना बिल्डिंग , आदिपुर रोड , अन्जार , कच्छ भेज सकेगा । 9393 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य : गुजरात

जिला: पाटण

तालुका: पाटण

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं.

खसरा सं.

वर्ग मीटर गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर

पी2

366

उन्द्रा

पी1

353

पी3

353

350

354

पी1

349

341

340

337

पी

339

338

335

336

पी1

307

पी2

307

305

और 304 के

सडक खसरा संख्या 305

बीच में

304

281

282

284

पी2

298

पी1

298

287

وا

289

288

290

291

256

नहर खसरा संख्या 256 *]

255 9394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

तालुका : पाटण

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

जिला: पाटण

क्रम सं. गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.' 1

3 1

यस्ता खसरा संख्या 255 और 230/2 के

उन्द्रा(जारी ... )

बीच में

230

नहर खसरा संख्या 230/2 और 236 के

बीच में

236

235

239

240

143

243 2

सापरा

375

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 375 और 91 के

बीच में

92 3

कोइटा

101

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं .

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

44 1

32 2

88 3

94 1

पी2

1पी 2

1पी1

48 4

88 1

26 1

95 1

86 पी 2

20 1

2पी 2

08 2

1पी2

23 8

पी3

पी

64 9395

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : गुजरात

जिला: पाटण

तालुका: पाटण

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं .

3 2

101 3 कोइटा (जारी...)

105

एस.एच. -7 खसरा संख्या 105 /पी3 और 105/पी के बीच में

105

यस्ता असय संख्या 105 /पी और 145/पी 3 के बीच में

145

146

145

148

147

150

162

166

165

32 वायड

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं.

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

पी2

पी1

पी2

पी3

पी

पी3

पी2

पी

पी3

50.

पी1

पी1 और पी2

पी1

पी

एस.एच. -130 खसरा संख्या 51

50/पी2 के बीच में

और

109

111

पी2

पी1

पी2

पी3

पी1

0 9396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11. 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1926

तालुका: पाटण

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

जिला : पाटण

क्रम सं. गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

121

वायड(जारी...)

120

185

210

218

219

222

221

226

227

सडक खसरा संख्या 227 / पी3 और

और

243/पी 2 के बीच में

243

242

248

वाहणा

नहर खसरा संख्या 68/ पी और 69 के

बीच में

नदी खसरा संख्या 43 और 1 के बीच में राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं .

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर

पी1

पी2

पी1

पी3

पी2

पी1

पी2

पी 1

पी3

पी4

पी

¥༔5༔ 2

is 9397

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य: गुजरात

जिला: पाटण

: पाटण

तालुका

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

3 2

1 5 वाहणा (जारी... )

7 6 अमरपुरा

चेला नाला वाहाणा गाम सीमा और खसरा संख्या 90 के बीच में

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 51 /पी 2 और 46/पी2

के बीच में

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 45/पी 1 और 33/पी 1

के बीच में

सडक खसरा संख्या 33 /पी 1

62 उन्टवाडा

66 3530 GI/2004-15

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं .

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

1पी

पी2

पी1

पी2

पी 2

पी 1

पी3

पी1

पी2

पी 2

पी1

पी2

2 9398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] तालुका: पाटण

जिला: पाटण

राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं. गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

उप खण्ड सं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर 1

7 रास्ता खसरा संख्या 66/2 और 74/पी के

7 उन्टवाडा(जारी...)

बीच में

पी पी1

[फा. सं. आर-31015/37/2004- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव्

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004

S. O. 3146.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.V. Sarvaiya, Competent Authority, Mundra -Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Gymkhana Building, Adipur Road, Anjar, Kutch- (Gujarat). 370110 9399

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 11, 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

State : GUJARAT

District: PATAN

Taluk : PATAN

SurveyNo.

Name of Village

366 ۱۰ UNDRA

353

350

354

349

341

340

337

339

338

335

336

307

305

Asphalted Road In between Survey No.

305& 304

304

281

282

284

298

287

289

288

290

291

256

Canal in Survey No. 256

255

Area

Are

Hectare

Square Metre Sub- Division No.

0 9400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1946

Taluk : PATAN

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

District: PATAN

Name of Village

SurveyNo.

1. UNDRA CarttrackInbetween Survey No. 255

&230/2 (Contd... )

230

Canal In between Survey No. 230/2

and 236

236

235

239

240

143

243 2.

SAPRA

375

Carttrack Inbetween Survey No. 375 &

92 3. ΚΟΙΤΑ

101

State : GUJARAT

Area

Hectare Are

Sub- Division No.

Square Metre

44 1

32 2

04 0

88 3

94 1

67 P2

82 1P2

25 1P1

54. 0

20 0

52 0

66 0

26 0

32 0

84 3

48 4

88 1

62 0

31 0

26 1

84 0

95 1

86 P2

20 1

73 2P2

08 2

04 1P2

23 8

88 P3

47 P

64 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

9401

State : GUJARAT

District: PATAN

Taluk : PATAN

SurveyNo.

Name of Village

101 3. ΚΟΙΤΑ

105 (Contd... )

105

SH-7 In Between Survey Number .

105/P3 and 105/P

105

Carttrack In Between Survey No.

105/P & 145/P3

145

146

145

148

147

150

162

166

165

32 4. WAYAD

SH-130 In Between Survey Number No. 51 and 50/P2

109

111

Area

Are

Hectare

Square Metre Sub- Division No.

P1&P2

0 9402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20. 1946

Taluk : PATAN

[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) |

District : PATAN

Name of Village

SurveyNo.

121 4. WAYAD (Contd ...)

120

185

210

218

219

222

221

226

227

Asphalted Road In Between Survey Number. 227/P3 and 243/P2

243

242

248

248 5. VAHANA

68 Canal Inbetween Survey No. 68/P &

River in between Survey No. 43 & 1

State : GUJARAT

Area

Hectare Are

Sub- Division No.

Square Metre

76 P1

21 P1

15 i

48 0

71 P2

11 P1

95 P3

24 0

98 P2

56 P1

31 P2

42 P1

13 P3

82 0

91 0

54 P

16 0

42 0

98 0

62 0

72 0

12 0

40 0

04 0

74 0

06 0

30 ..PP2P

12 0

30 0

27 9403

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

State : GUJARAT

District: PATAN

Taluk : PATAN

SurveyNo.

Name of Village

7 S. VAHANA (Contd ...)

Chela Nala in betweenvillage boundry Vahana

6. AMARPURA

Carttrack Inbetween Survey No. 51 /P2 &46/P2

Metalled Road In between Survey No. 45/P1& 33/P1

Asphalted RoadIn Survey No.33/P1

62 7. UNTWADA

Area

Are

Hectare

Square Metre Sub- Division No.

2 9404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1946 [PART II-- SEC . 3 (ii) ] Taluk : PATAN

District : PATAN

State : GUJARAT

Area

Name of Village

SurveyNo.

Hectare Are

Sub- Division No.

Square Metre

7. UNTWADA (Contd...)

Carttrack in between Survey No. 66/2 & 74/P

74 74

[No. R-31015/37/2004- O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3147.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा- दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, 16, कृष्णा विहार, नारायण निवास के पास, गोपलपुरा बाईपास रोड़, जयपुर पिन 302018 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9405

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

तहसील: जयपुर

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

30 1. मूण्डियापुरोहितान

13/234

10/233

46/240

31 2. मूण्डियारामसर

26/414

13/413

9 3. सीतारामपुरा

8 3530 GL/ 2004-16

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयरयर

86 0

53 0

95 0

72 0

66 0

0 9406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946

तहसील : जयपुर

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला: जयपुर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

3 3.

5 सीतारामपुरा (जारी...)

7 4. जयसिंहपुराकांकझेदा

7/174

7/174/2

2/171 5. किशोरपुराकांकङोदा

10 6. नारीकावास

45(स.रास्ता)

66 7. भूधरपुरा

91 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 0

95 0

98 0

51 0

27 }

04 0

25 0

79 0

51 0

25 0

44 0

15 0

20 0

41 0

23 0

68 0

20 0

99 0

68 0

87 0

20 0

97 0

89 0

90 0

29 0

28 0

20 0

62 0

39-

86 0

47 0

90 0

56 9407

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

तहसील: जयपुर

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

96 7. भूधरपुरा (जारी...)

89.

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

88/131

98/123

85/132

82(स.रास्ता)

3 (जे.डी.ए. चारागाह)

8. लालचन्दपुरा

2(जे.डी.ए. तलाई)

1 (जे.डी.ए. चारामाह)

276/1 9. बावड़ी

276/2

274/1

274/2

274/3

274/4

274/5

31 0

275/1/1

275/1/2

275/1/3

36(जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)

51 (जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)

60/2

जारी... 5 9408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

तहसील : जयपुर

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

जिला : जयपुर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

3 9. बावड़ी (जारी...)

69/1

84/1

84/2

78(जे.डी.ए. नाला)

76 10. चकमोज्या

10 11. सिंवार

722

723

717 (रेलवे विभाग)

676/1

676/2

677

681 (जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)

662

663

661

154 (जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)

652

651

650/1125

171 (जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)

187

188 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

6 0

18 0

61 0

95 0

20 0

95 0

48 0

91 0

94 0

59 0

20 0

82 0

74 0

05 0

44 0

57 0

88 0

77 0

25 。

32 }

65 0

02 0

74 0

88 0

51 0

44 0

02 0

88 0

20 0

80 0

50 0

07 9409

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

तहसील: जयपुर

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

185 11. सिंवार (जारी... )

185/1

185/2

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

10.2(जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)

210

219 (जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)

216

215

227

228

122 12. चकबासड़ी

123

121

120

18 13. मंशारामपुरा

20/3

20/1

26/362

27/363

0 9410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसील : जयपुर

जिला : जयपुर

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 2

6 14. मांचवा

179

211

213

213/900

216

215

215/901

227

222(स.भूमि)

226

228

225(स.भूमि)

224/1050

224/1051

269

264

265

266

457(स.नदी)

457/1019 (स.भूमि)

457/1021/1/1 (स.भूमि)

457/1028/1

457/1026

457/1028/3

457/1028/2

457मिन

457/1018

457/1028/4

457/1057मिन

457/1022/1

457/1022/2

457/1021/1

457/1021/2

399मिन

399/1 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)

68 9411

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

तहसील : जयपुर

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

400/2(पी.डब्ल्यू, डी.सड़क) 14. मांचवा (जारी...)

400/1

410

409/2

409/925

444

443

445

446

446/929

435

430

431

432

433

425

426

130/1010 15. पिण्डोलाई

130

112

110 16. सबरामपुरा

108/861

108/865

108/863

108/860

138/1

138/2

139

140

141

142

144

145

94(स.रास्ता)

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर

67 0

12 0

50 0

07 0

17 0

47 0

20 0

68 0

46 0

61 0

83 0

41 0

01 9412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] तहसील : जयपुर

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

190

16. सबरामपुरा (जारी ...)

189

188

185

186

184

[फा. सं . आर-31015/54/2004- ओ.आर -1 ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004

S. O. 3147.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority Mundra-Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, 16 Krishna Vihar , Near Narayan Niwas , Gopalpura Bye -pass Road , Jaipur 302018 (Rajasthan) .

9413

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

State : RAJASTHAN

District: JAIPUR

Tehsil : JAIPUR

Khasara No. Sr. No Name of the Village

30 1. MUNDIYA PUROHITAN

13/234

10/233

Area

Sq.mtr. Hectare Are

6 4

46 0

53 0

95 0

80 0

46/240

08 0

81 0

20 0

57 0

88238

55

31 2. MUNDIYA RAMSAR

34 0

42 0

26/414

13/413.

9 3. SITARAMPURA

8 3530 GI/2004--17

66 0

20 0

77.

0 9414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

Tehsil : JAIPUR

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 、

District : JAIPUR

Sr. No Name of the Village

Khasara No. 1

5 3. SITARAMPURA ( Contd ... )

7 4. JAISINGHPURA KANKRODA

7/174 State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4

6 0

95 0

98 0

51 0

7/174/2

2/171 5. KISHORPURA KANKRODA

10 6. NARIKAWAS

41 0

04 0

25 0

79 0

51 0

25 0

44 0

15 0

20 0

45(G/L CartTrack)

66 7. BHUDARPURA

56 9415

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Tehsil : JAIPUR

Khasara No. Sr. No Nameof the Village

96 7. BHUDARPURA ( Contd ... )

88/131

98/123

85/132

Area

Sq.mtr.

Are

Hectare

82(G/L Cart Track)

3(J.D.A.Pasture)

8. LALCHANDPURA

2(J.D.A.Pond)

1(J.D.A.Pasture)

276/1 9. BAVADI

276/2

274/1

274/2

274/3

274/4

274/5

275/1/1

275/1/2

275/1/3

36(J.D.A.CartTrack)

51( J.D.A.Cart Track)

60/2

0 9416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA:

DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

[PART II-- SEC : 3 (ii)] Tehsil : JAIPUR

District: JAIPUR

State : RAJASTHAN Sr. No

Area

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

6 9. BAVADI ( Contd... )

69/1

84/1

84/2

78(J.D.A.Nala)

74 10. CHAKMOJYA

57 11. SINWAR

722

723

717(RailwayDeptt. )

676/1

676/2 } 。

677

681 ( J.D.A.Cart Track)

662

663

661

154( J.D.A.Cart Track)

652

651

650/1125

171(J.D.A.Cart Track)

187

188.

07 9417

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Tehsil : JAIPUR

Khasara No. Sr. No Name of the Village

185 11. SINWAR (Contd ...)

185/1

185/2

102( J.D.A.Cart Track)

210

219(J.D.A.Cart Track)

216

215

227

228

122 12. CHAK BASADI

123

121

120

18 13. MANSHA RAMPURA

20/3

20/1

26/362

27/363

Area

Sq.mtr.

Are

Hectare

06 0

25 9418

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] Tehsil : JAIPUR

District: JAIPUR

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr. No Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

14. MANCHAWA

179

211

213

213/900

216

215

215/901

227

222(G/L)

226

228

225(G/L)

224/1050

224/1051

269

264

265

266

457(G/L River)

457/1019(G/L)

457/1021/1/1(G/L)

457/1028/1

457/1026

457/1028/3

457/1028/2

457Min

457/1018

457/1028/4

457/1057Min

457/1022/1

457/1022/2

457/1021/1

457/1021/2

399Min

399/1 ( P.W.D.Road) 9419

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Tehsil : JAIPUR

Khasara No. Sr. No

Name of the Village

400/2( P.W.D.Road) 14. MANCHAWA (Contd ...)

400/1

410

409/2

409/925

444

443

445

446

446/929

435

430

431

432

433

425

426

130/1010 15. PINDOLAI

130

112

110 16. SABRAMPURA

108/861

108/865

108/863

108/860

138/1

138/2

139

140

141

142

144

145

94 (G/ L Cart Track)

Area

Are Sq.mtr .

Hectare

05 0

52 0

88 0

20 0

75 0

68 0

01 9420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II - SEC. 3 (ii ) ] Tehsil : JAIPUR

District : JAIPUR

State : RAJASTHAN Sr. No Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr. 1

6 16. SABRAMPURA ( Contd ... )

190

189

188

185

186

184

[No. R- 31015/54/2004-O.R. -II ]

HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004.

का. आ. 3148.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधि। नियम्, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुन्द्रा- दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, 16, कृष्णा विहार, नारायण निवास के पास , गोपलपुरा बाईपास रोड़, जयपुर पिन 302018 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9421

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची तहसील : फानी

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

164 बुकनी

178/1

178/2

178/3

178/4

178/5

178/6

178/7

179(स.रास्ता)

180(स.चारागाह)

320(सि.वि.नहर)

? 333/2(स.आबादी)

333/3मिन1 (स. चारागाह)

333/3(स.भूमि)

333/ 3मिन (स.भूमि.)

341

342(स.भूमि)

343

366(स.रास्ता)

349(स.भूमि)

357

356मिन1

356मिन 2 (स.भूमि)

354(स.पाल)

448/606 (स.खारड़ा)

573

572

571 (स.रास्ता)

570(स.खारहा)

569

568

565(स. रास्ता)

566

564

563 3530 G1 2004-18

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

20 0

}

99 0

}

05 0

22 0

0 9422

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

तहसील: फामी

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

जिला: जयपुर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

3 बुकनी (जारी...)

551

552

553

547

554

555

556

557

537

536

558(स.नदी)

598/1 मिन 1 (स.भूमि)

598/1मिन2

598/2

598/3

598/4 2. नन्दलालपुरा

161

160/1

160/2

159

166

158

167

168

180 (सि.वि.नहर)

201

199

198

197

205(सि.वि. बहर)

217

218

220

224

225

228

231

232 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

6 0

14 0

99 0

46 0

63 0

46 0

40 0

20 0

30 0

02 0

20 0

59 0

71 0

27 0

27 }

62 0

87 0

23 0

56 0

89 0

10 0

26 0

47 0

90 0

09 0

12 0

01 0

20 0

36 0

30 0

50 0

39 0

00 0

36 9423 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : अयपुर

तहसील : फानी

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

असय सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

233

2. नन्दलालपुरा (जारी...)

234

278

275

274

273

335 (सि.वि.नहर)

272

327

328

333

330

332

341

342(सि.वि.नहर)

344

343(स.भूमि)

184(स.हारहा)

3. शेरपुरा

183

182

180

181

233/1

233/2

233/3

233/4

233/5

233/6

234(सि.वि.नहर)

235 (सि.वि.नहर)

236(सि.वि.नहर)

239(स.चारागाह)

245

244

248 (स.रास्ता)

250

247

251 (स. रास्ता) 9424

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] तहसील : फागी

जिला : जयपुर

राज्य: राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 2

6 3. शेरपुरा (जारी...)

255

254

253

59 (स. रास्ता)

258(स.चारागाह)

50/1

50/2(स.चारागाह)

{

[फा. सं. आर-31015/59/2004- ओ.आर- ।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004

S. O. 3148.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority, Mundra- Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline Project, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, 16 Krishana Vihar , Near Narayan Niwas , Gopalpura Bye- pass Road , Jaipur 302018 ( Rajasthan) .

9425

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

State: RAJASTHAN

District: JAIPUR

Tehsil : PHAGI

Khasara No. Sr. No Nameof the Village

3 2

164 1. BUKNI

178/1

178/2

178/3

178/4

178/5

178/6

178/7

Area

Sq.mtr .

Are

Hectare

179(G/L Cart Track)

180(G/L Pasture)

320(Irri .Deptt. Canal )

333/2(G/L Abadi )

333/3 Min1 (G /L Pasture)

333/3(G/L)

333/3Min(G/L)

341

342(G/L)

343

366 (G /L Cart Track)

349(G/L)

357

356Min 1

356Min2(G/L)

。

}

354(G/L Pal)

448/606 (G/L Kharda)

573

572

571 (G/L Cart Track)

570 (G/L Kharda)

569

568

565(G/L Cart Track)

566

564

563

80 0 9426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] Tehsil : PHAGI

District : JAIPUR

State: RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr. No

KhasaraNo.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

6 1. BUKNI ( Contd...)

551

552

553

547

554

555

556

557

537

536

558(G/L River)

598/1Min1 (G/L)

598/1Min2

598/2

598/3

598/4

2. NANDALALPURA

161

160/1

160/2 }

159

166

158

167

168

180 ( Irri.Deptt. Canal )

201

199

198

197

205 ( Irri.Deptt. Canal )

217

218

220

224

225

228

231

232

36 9427

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District: JAIPUR

Tehsil : PHAGI

Khasara No. Sr. No Name of the Village

233 2. NANDALALPURA (Contd...)

234

278

275

274

273

Sq.mtr.

Area Are

Hectare

335 ( Irri.Deptt. Canal )

272

327

328

333

330

332

341

42 0 . 00

20 0

342( Irri.Deptt. Canal )

344

343(G/L)

184(G/L Jharda)

3. SHERPURA

183

182

180

181

233/1

233/2

233/3

233/4

233/5

233/6

234 ( Irri.Deptt . Canal )

235( Irri.Deptt. Canal )

236 (Irri.Deptt. Canal )

239 (G/L Pasture)

245

244

248 (G/L Cart Track)

250

247

82 0

251(G/L Cart Track)

9428

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3(ii )] Tehsil : PHAGI

District: JAIPUR

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr. No Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are

Sq.mtr. 2

6 3. SHERPURA ( Contd ... )

255

254

253

59(G/L Cart Track)

258 (G/L Pasture)

50/1

50/2(G/LPasture)

[No. R-31015/59/2004-O.R. - IIJ HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3149.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधि। नियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधि। कार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री राम करण शर्मा, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुन्द्रा - दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान संख्या 1418, सेक्टर-6 , बहादुर गढ़ 124507, जिला झज्जर (हरियाणा) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9429

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसुची

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

367 (रेलवे लाईन)

1. आसोदा टोडराम

879

1017

1022

1023

1024

1025

1028

1097

1098

1103

1104

1105

1106

1112(सड़क)

1117

1118

1119

1125

103

2. आसोदा सिवान

104

105

106

2/1

2/2

9/1

9/2

15/1

3530 GI/2004-19 9430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

जिलाः झज्जर

गाँव का नाम

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

मुसतिल

संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या

106

15/2 2. आसोदा सिवान (जारी ... )

107

11/2

19/1

19/2

23/1

144 (कक्षा रास्ता)

153(सड़क)

373(रास्ता) 3. बराही

1872(बदरो)

1952

1953

1954

1955

1957

1958

1963

1965

1969(रास्ता)

2040

2041

2044

2045

2049

2050

2051

2052

2053

2054

2083

2084

2089 हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 0

40 0

26 0

97 0

76 0

79 0

25 0

17 0

05 0

00 64 0

70.

01 82

30 9431

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः इंष्णर

तहसीलः बहादुरमद

गाँव का नाम

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

2094(सड़क)

3. बराही (जारी... )

2098

2112

2114

2140

2154

2155

2157

2158

2172

2173

2174

2175

2176

2178

2179

2192

2194

2276

2279

2285

2286

2287

2297

2299

2300

2301

2303

2304

2307

2313

2314

2316

2319(सड़क) श्रेत्रफल

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

06 0

33 0

18 0

04 0

35 0

0 9432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

जिलाः इंज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 3. बराही (जारी... )

2321

03 59

2324

2325

2326

2330

2331

2333

2338

2339

2340

2343

2344

2348

2356

2359

2360

2361

2362

2372

2373

2374

2375

2383

2384

2386

2395

2398

2399

2407

2408

2411

2412

2420

2421

72 9433

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

गाँव का नाम

असरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

2425

3. बराही (जारी ... )

2426

2431

2432

2503 (रास्ता)

2539

4. बाहमबोली

19/1

19/2

19/3(रास्ता)

20/1

20/2

20/1

20/2

24/2

14/2

16 श्रेत्रफल

वर्गमीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

00 9434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

जिलाः झज्जर

माँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

मुसतिल

संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या 4. बाहमनोली (जारी... )

3/1

3/2

4/1

4/2

1/1

1/2

2/1

2/2

3/1

6/2

6/3

7/1

7/2

8/1

15/1

15/2

10/2

17/1

17/2

18/1

25 हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 00

07 00

92 00

51 00

00 00

58 00

95 00

87 00

74 00

40 00

65 00

09 97 00

97 00

95 9435 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

21/1 (रास्ता)

100

4. बाहमभोली ( जारी...)

21/2

22/1

103

104

10/2

2/1/1

105

2/1/2

2/2

04.

3/1

08 99

3/2

6/1

04 48

6/2

124(बहर)

125( बदरो)

132(कक्षा रास्ता)

134(कक्षा रास्ता)

146(खाल)

160(सड़क)

923(रास्ता) 9436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] तहसीलः बहादुरगढ़

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 4. बाहमबोली (जारी ...)

932(रास्ता)

934(रास्ता)

935(रास्ता)

00.

952(कक्षा रास्ता)

957 (कक्षा रास्ता) 00

44 5. परबाला

2/1

2/2

2/3

8/1

8/2

9/1

9/2

14/2

16/2

25/1

00 03

25/3

25/4

23 9437 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926:

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3(ii) ]

राज्यःहरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः बहादुरमक

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का बाम

वर्गमीटर

एथर

हेक्टेयर

जवरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

5. परवाला (जारी )

10/1

17/1

17/2

17/3

18/1

00 0553

18/2

24/1

24/2

24/4

4/1

5/1

34.

5/2

060

6/1

106(बदरो)

129(रास्ता)

525(बहर)

528(जाल)

530(बाल)

550(रास्ता)

551 (रास्ता)

553(रास्ता)

554(रास्ता)

555(रास्ता)

558(रास्ता)

[फा. सं. आर-31015/56/2004- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 3530 GI/2004-20 9438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2004

S. O. 3149.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Ram Karan Sharma, Competent Authority, Mundra- Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, H. No.1418 , Sector - 6, Bahadurgarh 124507, District : Jhajjar (Haryana) .

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Bahadurgarh

District: Jhajjar

State: Haryana

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / KIlla No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre 1. ASUDHA TODRAN 28

367(Rly Line)

879

1017

1022

1023

1024

1025

1028

1097

1098

1103

1104

1105

1106

1112(Road) 0

1117

1118

1119

1125

59 9439

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: Haryana

District: Jhajjar

Tehsil:Bahadurgarh

Name of Village

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

103

2. ASUDHA SIWAN

104

105

106

2/1

2/2

9/1

9/2

15/1

15/2

106

107

11/2

19/1

19/2

23/1

Area

Hectare Are

Square Metre

25 0

91 0

33 0

15 0

24 0

47 0

10 0

41 0

95 0

10 0

75 0

00 0

26 0

76 0

79 0

25 0

17 0

64 0

144 (C.T)

153(Road)

373(Path)

66 0

12 0

1872(Drain)

3.BARAHI

1952

1953

1954

1955

1957

1958

1963

1965

1969 (Path)

2040

2041

2044

2045

82 0

85 0

46 0

69 0

70 0

82 0

15 0

21 9440

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : Bahadurgarh

District: Jhajjar

State:Haryana

Area

Khasara / Killa

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre 40

3. BARAHI ( Contd...)

2049

20 581

2050

2051

2052

2053

2054

2083

2084

2089

2094Road

2098

2112

2114

2140

2154

2155

2157

2158

2172

2173

2174

2175

2176

2178

08 81

2179

2192

2194

2276

2279

2285

2286

2287

2297

2299

2300

2301

2303

75 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

District : Jhajjar Tehsil Bahadurgarh

Khasara / Killa

Hadbast

Name of Village

Nove

Mustil No.

No.

2304 3. BARAHI (Contd...)

2307

2313

2314

2316

2319(Road)

2321

2324

2325

2326

2330...

2331

2333

2338

2339

2340

2343

2344

2348

2356

2359

2360

2361

2362

2372

2373

2374

2375

2383

2384

2386

2395

2398

2399

21 2407

2408

9441 State : Haryana

Area

BAR

Are

Hectare

Square Metre

38 0

10 0

68 0

94 0

0 9442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11. 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20. 1946

Tehsil :Bahadurgarh

District : Jhajjar

Khasara / Killa

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

No.

3. BARAHI ( Contd... )

2411

2412

2420

2421

2425

2426

2431

2432

2503(Path)

2539 4. BAMNOLI

19/1

19/2

19/3(Path)

20/1

20/2

20/1

20/2

24/2

14/2.

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] State: Haryana

Area

Hectare Are

Square Metre 0

84 0

87 0

33 0

72 0

71 0

58 0

63 00

10 0

30 0

98 9443

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: Haryana

District : Jhajjar

Tehsil:Bahadurgarh

Mustil Khasara / Killa

Hadbast

Name of Village

No.

4. BAMNOLI (Contd ... )

3/1

3/2

4/1

4/2

1/1

1/2

2/1

2/2

3/1

6/2

6/3

7パ

7/2

8/1

15/1

15/2

10/2

17/1

17/2

18/1

Area

Hectare Are

Square Metre

07 00

92 00

51 00

00 00

40 00

97 00

12 00

60 00

10 00

06 00

44 00

10 00

75 00

44 00

29 00

50 00

04 95

95 00

05 9444

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11.2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946 [ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil :Bahadurgarh

District : Jhajjar

State : Haryana

Area

Khasara / Killa

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

No.

Mustil

No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre

100

4. BAMNOLI ( Contd ... )

21/1 (Path )

000065

21/2

22/1

103

104

10/2

105

2/1/1

2/1/2

2/2

3/1

04 29

3/2

6/1

6/2

124(Canal)

125(Drain)

132(C.T)

134 (C.T)

146 (Khal )

160(Road)

923(Path) 9445

दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 20 , 1926

भारत का राजपत्र

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: Haryana

District: Jhajjar

Tehsil : Bahadurgarh

Hadbast

Name of Village

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

No.

932(Path)

4. BAMNOLI (Contd...)

934(Path)

935(Path)

952(C.T)

957 ( C.T)

5. PARNALA

2/1

2/2

2/3

8/1

8/2

9/1.

9/2

14/2

16/2

25/1

25/3

25/4 3530 GI/ 2004-21

Area

Are

Hectare

Square Metre

03 00

02.

86 00

63 00

51 00

00 9446

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii)) Tehsil :Bahadurgarh

District : Jhajjar

State: Haryana

Area Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No.

Hectare Are

Square Metre

5. PARNALA (Contd...)

10/1

17/1

17/2

17/3

18/1

18/2

24/1

24/2

24/4

4/1

5/1

5/2

6/1

106(Drain)

129(Path)

525(Canal)

528(Khal)

530(Khal)

550(Path)

551(Path)

553(Path)

554(Path)

555(Path)

558(Path)

[No. R- 31015/56/2004-O.R. - II ]

HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

9447 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3150.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गोवा में उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश में संरचनाओ से महाराष्ट्र राज्य में ठाणे जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ । स्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिध सूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और ख। निज पाइपलाइन (भूमिं में उपयोग के अधिधकार को अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियाँ का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिधकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा (3) की उपधारा (1) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधि। सूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिधकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस . डी. भिस, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जी. टी.आई. सी. एल . पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना , प्लॉट नं0 एस 13 , एच 13 से 15 तक , चौथा माला , भारत गैस गोडाउन के सामने , लाल चौकी आधारवाडी रोड , कल्याण प जिला ठाणे पिनकोड 421301 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिल्हा: ठाणे

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक : डहाणु

99 आर आर ऋवित करन कालए

सर्वे नं / गट नं

गाँव का नाम

हेक्टर

एर सिएर

57पी

1) तवे

58पी

68पी

75 9448

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20. 1946

2 1) तवे (निरंतर )

107/पी

सर्वे नं. 107/पी और 157पी के बीच में नास्मा

157पी

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

33 00

53 00

62 00

12 00

04 00

10 00

54 00

सर्वे नं . 157 में रस्ता

128पी

126

125

124

122

129

131

132

सर्वे नं . 131 और गाव की सीमा के बीच में नाला 2) कोल्हाण

सर्वे नं . 33 और गाव की सीमा के बीच में नाला

33/1

32/10

32/9

68 00

09 00

74 00

88 00

30 00

12 00

65 00

66 00

82 00

05 00

70 00

69 00

09 00

64 00

63 00

48 00

सर्वे नं . 24 में रस्ता

1/2

22/1

46/2

44पी

08 00

33 00

99 00

79 00

43 00

08 00

24 00

97 00

10 00

79 00

10 00

14 00

47 00

27 00

21 00

30पी 31पी और 136 पी (पुराना)

132

3) घोळ

158/1

144

147

23 00

59 00

33 00

08 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

सर्वे नं . 147 में रस्ता ३) घोल ( निरंत्तर)

146

सर्वे नं . 146 और 147 के बीच में कॅनाल

243

सर्वे नं. 243 और गाय की सीमा के बीच में नदी

सर्वे नं . 147 और गाय की सीमा के बीच में नदी 4) भराड

147

146

145

140/पी/3

140/पी/डब्लु/2

140/पी/डब्लु/1

140/पी/डब्लु/8

140/पी/डब्लु/ 7

140/पी/डब्लु/8

सर्वे नं . 140/3पी और डब्लु 6 के बीच में कॅनाल

सर्वे नं . डब्लु/7/ 6 और 66 /ए के बीच में रस्ता

68/ए/पी

66/बी

60/बी

18/की

सर्वे नं . 96 और 98 के बीच में नाला

सर्वे नं . 98 के बीच में नाला

100

5)चारोटी

101

103

103/पी

सर्वे नं . 103 और 113 के बीच में रस्ता

113

110

111

108पी

109

116/2

150

152पी

151

155

9449 3

49 00

19 00

96 00

62 00

97 00

26 00

06 00

58 00

59 01

82 00

00 9450

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

2 5) चारोटी (विस्तार )

164/ पी

163

161

162

165

167

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] 3

5 00

01 00

27 00

01 00

12 00

70 00

सर्वे नं . 165 में कॅनाल

183

82 02

सर्वे नं 166 के बिध मे कॅनाल

6) विवळवेढे

46/47

38/5

38/6

53/2

82/1

83 00

40 00

70 00

50 00

00 00

सर्वे नं . 80 और 82/4/ए के बीच में नाला

36/पी

29 00

00 00

सर्वे नं. 36 में रस्ता

37/पी

7) आवढाणी

129और 264 8) दहीगांव

17 00

00 00

31 00

44 00

53 01

58 00

91 00

सर्वे नं. 78 और 53 के बीच में नाला

53पी

39पी

84 01

57 00

सर्वे नं . 26 और 39 बीच में रस्ता

26/पी

9) देवुर

41 00

53 00

99 00

49 00

76 00

124/पी/डब्ल्यु133

124/पी/डब्ल्यु135

124/पी

सर्वे नं . 124/पी और गाव की सीमा के बीच में नाला

123

92 00

74 00

44 00

89 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

395/1(गया 297) 10) মনিবী

सर्वे नं. 395/1 /4ए में नाला

110

112पी

395/पी/डक्पु/22

185

115

395/8 (नया 291)

395/7(नया 290)

395/8 (नया 289)

395/1पी/डक्पु/12

120

121

285(नया 87)

122/2

393(नया 85)

107

11) चिंक्ले

128

105

98/2/8

112/2

52/1/1

52/1/2

53/1

110/1

सर्वे नं . 91 और गाव की सीमा के बीच में नाल्लका

सर्वे नं .58 और गाव की सीमा के बीच में नाला 12) सासवंद

58/1/3

58/1/4

58/8

9451

5 3

71 00

62 00

43 00

97 00

82 00

12 00

81 01

47 00

80 00

75 00

10 00

87 02

72 00

33 00

82 00

58 00

94 00

27 00

05 00

64 00

03 9452

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

126

13) पुंजावे

121

122

123

120दी

118

117

116

113

114

112पी

111पी

108

109

110

153

1पी

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] 3

5 00

78 00

17 00

95 00

61 00

12 00

10 00

00 00

50 00

38 00

40 00

75 00

10 00

50 00

89 00

06 00

00 00

75 00

50 00

00 00

12 00

10 00

50 00

25 00

सर्वे नं 2 और 41 के बीच में रस्ता

2पी

34पी

22पी

24 00

37 00

40 00

80 00

60 00

30 00

00 00

50 00

40 00

10 00

75 00

10 00

20 00

00 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

14) पार्टी

सर्वे नं . 15 और 8 बीच में रस्ता

44पी

15) ब्राम्हणवाडी

13पी

424

18) वापचरी

423

422

430

469

सर्वे नं . 422 और गाव की सीमा के बीच में नदी

जिल्हा :ठाणे मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक : पालघर

55/पी

1) सोमटे

104

100

105

सर्वे नं 109 में रस्ता

109

3530 GI/2004-22

9453 3

00 00

14 00

33 00

87 00

10 00

81 00

73 00

95 00

36 00

12 00

65 00

60 00

11 00

00 00

02 00

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

02 00

93 00

46 00

96 00

00 9454

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946

2 1) सोमटे ( निरंतर)

सर्वे नं 49 में रस्ता

136

297

2) ब-हाणपूर

298

299

300

सर्वे नं . 318 में रस्ता

318

सर्वे नं . 318 में कॅनाल

319

309

310

311

268

2) क-कानपूर ( निरंतर )

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

5 00

68 00

13 00

11 00

51 00

97 00

25 00

04 00

94 00

34 00

87 00

28 00

58 00

66 00

97 00

58 00

64 00

37 00

54 00

40 00

42 00

06 00

सर्वे नं . 268 और 270 के बीच में रस्ता

270

269

308

305

सर्वे नं . 297 में एन . एच . 8

33 00

87 00

88 00

78 00

50 [फा. सं. एल -14014/44/2004-जी.पी. ] एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 8th December , 2004

S. O. 3150.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from exploration blocks in the Northern/Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh State, to the various consumers of District Thane in the State of Maharashtra, a pipeline should be laid by M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

9455

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of section (3 ) of the said Act , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri S.D.Bhise, Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, Pipeline Project , Plot No.S - 13 , H- 13 to 15 , 4th floor , Opp . Bharat Gas Godown, Andharwadi Road , Lal Chowki, Kalyan (W), Pin code - 421301 .

Schedule

State: Maharashtra

District :Thane

Mandal /Thesil /Taluk : Dahanu

Survey No./Gat No.

Village

2 1

57P

1) Tave

58P

68P

107/P

Ared to be acqusroder

C-Are

Are

Hectare

16 00

22 00

33 00

53 00

54 00

Nala in bet. Svy No. 107/P &

157P

23 00

68 00

Road in bet. Svy No. 157

128P

126

125

124

122

129

131

132

Nala in bet Svy No. 131 & V. B.

30 00

82 00

00 9456

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

2 2)Kolhan

Nala in bet. V.B. & Svy. No. 33

33/1

32/10

32/9

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

70 00

69 00

01.

09 00.

84 00

63 00

Road in Svy. No. 24

1/2

22/1

46/2

44P

08 00

99 00

79 00

43 00

08 00

24 00

97 00

10 00

79 00

10 00

14 00

47 00

27 00

21 00

30 P, 31 P & 136 P (Old)

3) Ghol

132

158/1

144

147

44 00

23 00

59 00

33 00

Road in Svy No. 147

146

Canal inbet. Svy No. 146 & 147

243

24 00

66 00

49 01

River in bet. Svy No. 243 &VB

4)Bharad

River in bet . V.B. & Svy. No. 147

147

146

145

140/P/3

140/P/W/2

140/P/W/1

140/P/W/6

140/ P/W/7

140/P/W/8 00

19 00

74 00

46 00

21 00

96 00

82 00

62 00

45 00

66 00

97 00

70 00

Canal inbet Svy. No. 140/P/3 &

W/6

20 00

Road inbet. Svy . No. W/7/6 &

66/A

43 9457

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

66/A/P

4) Bharad (Contd....)

66/B

60/B

48/B

70 00

58 00

Nala in bet. Svy. No. 96 & 98

Nala in Svy. No. 98

100

5) Charoti

101

103

103/P

85 00

59 01

Road in bet. Svy. No. 103 & 113

113

110

111

108P

109

116/2

150

152P

151

155.

164/P

163

161

162

165

167

Canal in Svy No. 165

183

Canal In Svy No 166

46/47 6)Vivalvedhe

38/5

38/6

53/2

82/1

79 00

65 00

44 00

01 00

00 9458

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946

2 6) Vivalvedhe(Contd....)

[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii)] 3

5 00

Nala in bet. Svy. No. 80&

82/4/A

36/P

29 00

00 00

Road in Svy . No. 36

37/P

7) Avadhani

129& 264

8) Dahigaon

17 00

00 00

31 00

44 00

08 00

53 01

58 00

91 00

Nala in bet Svy. No. 76 & 53

53P

39P

84 01

57 00

Road in bet syv No. 26 & 39

26/P

9) Devur

124/P/W-133 00

41 00

53 00

99 00

49 00

76 00

124/P/W-135

124/P

Nala in bet. Svy No 124/P & V.B.

123

10) Dhanivari

92 00

74 00

44 00

89 00

395/1/4A ( New 297)

71 00

Nala in Svy. No. 395/1 /4A

110

112P

395/ P/W/22

185

115

82 00

62 00

43 00

61 00

42 00

395/8 (New 291 )

395/7 (New 290)

395/6 (New 289 )

395/1P/W/12

120

121

285(New 67)

122/2

393(New 85) 00

19 00

82 00

12 00

81 01

48 00

58 9459

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

107

11) Chinchale

126

105

98/2/6

112/2

52/1/1

52/1/2

53/1

110/1

Nala in bet Svy No. 91 & V.B.

75 00

10 00

19 00

58 00

Nala in bet. V.B & Svy No. 58

12) Saswand

58/1/3

58/1/4

58/6

58/8

128

13) Punjave

121

122

123

120P

118

117

118

113

114

112P

108

109

110

153

78 00

50 00

75 00

06 00

00 9460

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946

13) Punjave (Contd....)

Road inbet . Svy. No. 2 & 41

34P

22P

14) Pardi

Road inbet . Svy . No. 15 & 8

15) Bramhanawadi

44P

13P

16) Dapchari

424

423

422

430

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00

50 00

00 00

12 00

10 00

50 00

25 00

24 00

37 00

40 00

80 00

60 00

30 00

00 00

50 00

40 00

10 00

75 00

10 00

20 00

00 00

40 00

00 00

30 00

00 00

14 00

33 00

79 00

87 00

32 00

10 00

81 00

73 00

48 01

61 00

95 04

53 02

00 00

38 00

30 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

18) Depchari (Contd....)

469

River in bet. Svy. No. 422 & V.B.

Thane

District :

Mandal Thesil Taluk : Palaghar

55/P 1) Somate

104

100

105

Road in Svy.No.109

109

Road inSvy.No.49

136

297 2) Brahanpur

298

299

300

Road in Svy. No. 318

318

Canal in Svy No.318

319

309 3530 GI/2004-23

9461 3

12 00

67 00

60 00

00 00

02 00

State : Maharashtra

93 00

85 00

34 00

84號 00

04 00

96 00

18-

60. 00

55 00

61.

25 00

28 00

58 00

64 00

00 9462

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

310

2) Brahanpur ( Contd ....)

311

268

Road inbet. Svy. No. 268 & 270

270

269

308

305

N.H. -8 in Svy. No. 297

[F. No. L-14014/44/2004-G.P. ]

S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3151.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाघोडीया प्लांट अपोलो टायर पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल (इंडिया) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , श्री आर .एस . रानाडे , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल (इण्डिया) लिमिटेड , द्वितीय तल , दर्पण भवन , आर.सी. दत्त रोड, वदोदरा -390 005 (गुजरात) को लिखित रूप में आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला

तहसील

गाँव

सर्वे नं.

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में) 1

वदोदरा

वाघोडीया

लिमडा

951

0-02-94

950

0-01-23

949

0-04-06

योग

0-08-23

[फा. सं. एल-14014/33/2004- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव 9463 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004

S. O. 3151. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Waghodia Plant toApollo Tyre pipeline project in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India ) Limited;

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying thesaid pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land )Act , 1962(50 of1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the rightof user therein .

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule rnay, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Sh . R.S. Ranade , Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, 2nd Floor , Darpan Building , R.C. Dutt Road , Vadodara - 390 005 (Gujarat).

SCHEDULE

SurveyNo.

Tehsil

Village

Distt.

Area to be Acquired for R.O.U. (in Hectares)

0-02-94

951

Limda

Vadodara Waghodia

0-01-23

950

0-04-06.

949

0-08-23

TOTAL

[F. No. L-14014/33/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

9464

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 10 दिसम्बर , 2004

का. आ . 3152.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है क़ि मुन्द्रा ( गुजरात ) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री रामकरण शर्मा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा- दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान संख्या 1418 , सेक्टर-6 , बहादुरगढ़ -124507 , जिला झज्जर ( हरियाणा ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9465 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसुची

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

*गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा / किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

250

1. लुहारी

17/1

17/2

609

8/1

8/2

19/1 9466

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3( ii )] तहसीलः झज्जर

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

खसरा/ किला

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 1. लुहारी (जारी... )

250

19/2

00 62

611

9/1

9/2

10/2

00 07

56.

21/1

286

21/2

288

119

280

00 05

24/1

24/2

工 9467 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

3/2

127

250

1. लुहारी (जारी ... )

583

15/1

144

15/2

15/3

25/1

25/2

1/2

145

00 08

9/2

620

11/2

11/3

03 38

20/1

20/2

585

153

5/1

7/1

7/2

18 9468

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसीलः झज्जर

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

खसरा/ किला

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 1. लुहारी (जारी...)

250 153

10 80

588

00 00

167

00 04

9/1

01.

9/2

00 07

20/1

21/2

00 11

22/1

174

1/1

1/2

00 09 90

00 03

175

6/1

6/2

00 11

17/1

00 00

17/2/1

00 00

17/2/2

00 00

184

00 00

18/1

18/2

589

60 9469 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

खसरा/ किला

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

21/2

276

2. कुतानी

376

20/2

49.

10/

131

02 50

3530 GI/ 2004-24 9470

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] तहसीलः झज्जर

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 2. कुतानी (जारी...)

276

10 64

00 03 80

00 07

23/1

9/1

02 88

132

9/2

00 00

19/2

00 03 75

10 45

10/1

00 08

10/2

00 08 19

00 03 00

25/1

00 05

25/2

00 04

342

00 10

01 9471 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

276

2. कुताबी (जारी...)

343

00 11

134

7/1

7/2

23/2

24/1

24/2

133/2

406

275

3. दादरी तोए

175

498

1/2

66 9472

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA20, 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] तहसीलः झज्जर

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 3. दादरी तोए (जारी ... )

275

00 00

10/1

00 11 18

00 05

11/2

20/2

00 06

468

00 00

21/1

00 00

21/2

500

00 10 50

00 00

499

00 04

502

00 00. 60

7/1

7/2

13/2

00 09

477

23/1

23/2

100

505

00 09

8/2

40 9473 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अगहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

9/1

100

275

3. दादरी तोए (जारी... )

9/2

169

511

115

25/1

25/2

116

00 08

122

509

17/1

131

17/2

489

23/2 9474

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii)] तहसीलः झज्जर

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 3. दादरी तोए (जारी... )

275 131

24/1

00 02

24/2

136

3/2

4/1

10 95

18/1

18/2

00 01

00 10

139

88 4. बीड़ दादरी

271

00 10

00 68

00 08

00 11

21 5. मूनीमपुर कुकडोला

269

00 09

124

00 07

00 03

165

00 09 30

05 9475 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

खसरा/ किला

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

269

5. मूनीमपुर कुकडोला (जारी...)

00 58

4/1

4/2

00 01

7/1

7/2

6. बाहमबोला

270

97.

00 09

4/1

4/2

5/1/1

7/1/1

7/1/2

7/2

14/1/2

14/2/2

17/1

17/2

3/1

03 49

3/2

7/2

8/1

10 98

305

23 9476

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] तहसीलः झज्जर

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या

एयर

हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर 6. बाहमबोला (जारी ... )

270

12/1

12/2

00 00

00 03

00 07

22/1

00 00

00 04

22/3

00 05 69

23/1

2/2

00 10

00 00

10/1

10/2

286

00 09

325

19 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

जिलाः झज्जर तहसीलः झज्जर

गाँव का नाम

9477 राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

वर्गमीटर एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा किला

संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

310

270

6. बाहमबोला (जारी...)

19/2

324

9/1

9/2

12/1

12/2

332

103

345

25/1

25/2

15 3530 GI/2004-25

00 00

00 08

06 48

00 00

00 20 00

00 9478

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] तहसीलः झज्जर

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 6. बाहमबोला (जारी... )

270

00 04

17/1

00 02

17/2

7. लाडपुर

110

00 00

00 05 13

00 11

00 00

21/1

00 66

00 03

00 08 86

456

00 00

119

04 05

00 09

25/1

25/2

05 9479 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा किला संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

7. लाडपुर (जारी...)

123

474

8/2

12/1

12/2

13/1

19/1

19/2

19/3

137

21/2

1/1

60 9480

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] तहसीलः झज्जर

जिलाः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल

संख्या

खसरा किला संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर 7. लाडपुर (जारी... )

1/2

480

00 00

138

00 00

6/1

00 02

15/1

15/2

00 06 48

462

00 01

13 8. फैजाबाद उर्फ पाहसौर

00 03

00 00 10

00 06

00 04

287

00 00

8/1

8/2

00 02

23/1

00 00

10 9481 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

तहसीलः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा/ किला

संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

09 90

23/2

8. फैजाबाद उर्फ पाहसौर

289

(जारी...)

9/1

12/1

12/2

[फा. सं. आर-31015/36/2004- ओ.आर-१॥ ]

हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th December , 2004

S. O. 3152.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra ( Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described, in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Ram Karan Sharma, Competent Authority, Mundra -Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, H. No.1418 , Sector- 6, Bahadurgarh 124507 , District : Jhajjar (Haryana).

9482

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : JHAJJAR

District : JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Are

Khasara / KillaNo. Hectare

Square Metre 1. LOHARI

250

00 03

17/1

17/2

609

24.

8/1

8/2

19/1

93 9483 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil :JHAJJAR

Area

Are

Hectare

Name of Village

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

19/2

250

1. LOHARI (Contd...)

611

9/1

9/2

10/2

21/1

286

21/2

00 00

288

119

280

24/1

24/2 9484

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil :JHAJJAR

District : JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

250

127

1. LOHARI ( Contd... )

3/2

00 11

583

00 00

144

15/1

15/2

15/3

25/1

25/2

145

1/2

08 05

9/2

620

11/2

11/3

20/1

20/2

153

585

5/1

7/1

00 09 36

7/2

10 65 9485 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil : JHAJJAR

Area

Nameof Village

Mustil No.

Hectare Are

Khasara / Killa No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

10 80

153

250

1. LOHARI ( Contd ...)

588

167

9/1

9/2

20/1

21/2

22/1

00 01

1/1

174

1/2

175

6/1

6/2

17/1

17/2/1

17/2/2

184

18/1

18/2

589

3530 GI/2004-26 9486

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) , Tehsil :JHAJJAR

District : JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre 2. KUTANI

276

21/2

00 00

00 10

376

20/2

00 00

00 05 49

00 08

00 00

131

00 08 08

00 09 06

00 04 50

86 9487 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Siate : HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil :JHAJJAR

Area

Are

Hectare

Name of Village

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

276

2. KUTANI (Contd...)

343

134

7/1

7/2

23/2

24/1

24/2

133/2

406

275

3. DADRI TOE

00 05

175

498

1/2

66 9488

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] Tehsil : JHAJJAR

District: JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

276

2. KUTANI (Contd...)

00 11

00 10 64

23/1

00 00

9/1

00 02 88

132

9/2

19/2

10/1

00 08 86

10/2

00 02 30

00 03

25/1

00 05

25/2

11 16

342

01 9489 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil :JHAJJAR

Area

Nameof Village

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Square Metre

275

3. DADRI TOE (Contd... )

10/1

11/2

20/2

468

21/1

21/2

500

499

00 04

502

93.

7/1

7/2

13/2

477

23/1

23/2

505

100

8/2 9490

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil :JHAJJAR

District : JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

No. Mustil Khasara / Killa No.

Are

Hectare

Square Metre

100

275

9/1

06 3. DADRI TOE ( Contd ...)

9/2

169

115

511

25/1

00 02

25/2

116

122

509

17/1

00 03

131

17/2

489

23/2

68 9491 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State: HARYANA

District : JHAJJAR

Tehsil :JHAJJAR

Area

Are

Hectare

Name of Village

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Hadbast No.

Metre Square

24/1

131

275

3. DADRI TOE (Contd...)

24/2

3/2

136

4/1

18/1

18/2

139

271

4. BIR DADRI

00 68

269

5. MUNIMPUR KUKROLA

00 10

124

165

16 9492

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : JHAJJAR

District: JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

No. Mustil Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

269

5. MUNIMPUR KUKROLA

(Contd... )

4/1

00 05

4/2

00 04

7/1

00 01

7/2

00 09

00 11

00 00

84 6. BAMANOLA

270

00 01

4/1

4/2

5/1/1

7/1/1

7/1/2

7/2

14/1/2

91.

14/2/2

17/1

17/2

3/1

00 00

3/2

03 49

7/2

8/1

00.. 09

305

98 9493 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District: JHAJJAR

Tehsil :JHAJJAR

Area

Nameof Village

Hectare Are

Khasara / Killa No.

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Metre Square

270

6. BAMANOLA (Contd...)

12/1

12/2

07 39

22/1

00 *

22/3

23/1

10 93

2/2

00 00

00 10

10/1

10/2

286

325

00 11

3530 GI/2004-27 9494

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] Tehsil :JHAJJAR

District : JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

No. Mustil Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

270

310

6. BAMANOLA ( Contd ...)

19/2

324

00 02

34/

9/1

9/2

12/1

00 06

12/2

332

00 00

103

00 02 10

00 03

345

00 07

25/1

25/2

99 9495 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District: JHAJJAR

Tehsil : JHAJJAR

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Nameof Village

Metre Square

Hadbast No.

270

6. BAMANOLA (Contd ... )

17/1

17/2

110

7. LADPURA

21/1

456

119

25/1

25/2

14 9496

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] Tehsil : JHAJJAR

District: JHAJJAR

State: HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No. No. Mustil Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

7. LADPURA ( Contd... )

00 09 58

123

02 92

00 01

10 88

10 89

474

8/2

12/1

12/2

00 05

13/1

19/1

19/2

19/3

10 94

137

00 00

04 49

06 82

21/2

1/1

10 9497 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : HARYANA

District: JHAJJAR

Tehsil : JHAJJAR

Area

Are

Hectare

Khasara / Killa No.

Mustil No.

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Square Metre

1/2

7. LADPURA ( Contd... )

480

138

6/1

15/1

15/2

48-

01.

462

00.

8. FAIZABAD ALIAS PASAOR

00.

00 08

287

8/1

8/2

23/1 9498

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1946 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : JHAJJAR

District : JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA

Area

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

No. Mustil Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

23/2

00 09

90 8. FAIZABAD ALIAS PASAOR ( Contd ... )

289

00 00

9/1

00 04

12/1

00 03

12/2

00 00

[No. R- 31015/36/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 10 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3153. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिधकार का अर्जन ) अधि। नियम्,1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुन्द्रा- दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, 16, कृष्णा विहार, नारायण निवास के पास, गोपलपुरा बाईपास रोड़, जयपुर पिन 302018 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9499

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला : अजमेर

तहसील : पीसांगन

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

11 गोला

17 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

30(स.नाला)

32.

28(स.भूमि)

26(स.भूमि)

49(स.बरहा)

76मिन

१०(स.बरहा)

105(स. बरहा)

104

103

106

102

100

255(स.बरहा)

256

257

272

271

269

}

0.1

0 9500

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

तहसील : पीसाँगन

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

जिला : अजमेर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

3 1. गोला (जारी...)

270

274

282

280

279 राज्य: राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

6 0

00 0

20 0

63 0

279मिन (स.भूमि)

}

296(स.बरहा)

22 0

297(स.भूमि)

10 0

298(पी.डब्ल्यू.डी.सड़क)

423

420

421

422 0

42 0

93 0

20 0

03 0

424(स.बरहा)

31 0

387(स.बरड़ा)

613

16 0

612(स.बरहा)

76 0

611 (स.बरहा)

620

59 0

620मिन (स.भूमि)

}

609(स. बरड़ा)

607

58 0

607मिन

608

{

17 0

603(स.रास्ता)

592

593

16 0

52 0

593मिन (स.भूमि)

599

601 }

80 0

624(स. रास्ता)

786

791

792

790(स. बरड़ा)

75 9501

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

जिला : अजमेर तहसील : पीसामन

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

801 1. मोला (जारी...)

803 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

6 4

70 0

804(स.भूमि)

805

812

813

814

816

820

821

822

823

45 0

99 0

17 0

01 0

823मिन

}

74 0

815(स.नाला)

914

}

914मिन

900

902

1163

1164

1165

1174

59 0

95.

1.176 (स.भूमि)

1295

1296

1294

1293

1299

1300

1301

1291

1290

1302

1303

1304 3530 GI/2004-28

20 0

-00

0 9502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11,2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

तहसील : पीसांगन

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

जिला: अजमेर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

3 1. गोला (जारी...)

1305

1311

1312

1247

1248

1238

क्षेत्रफल

रएवर

मीटर

6 0

75 0

63 0

11 0

66 0

1239(स.भूमि)

1239मिन

1240 2. सामला

5010

5013

5012

5024

5028 }

10 0

60 0

77 0

56 0

47 0

32 0

5023(स. रास्ता)

5018

5021

26 0

29 0

63 0

5135(स. माला)

5134

30 0

5134मिन

}

5123मिन

5117

5116 0

99 0

21 0

77 0

5111(स.भूमि)

58 0

5125(स.रास्ता)

5128

5127 03

05 0

76 0

41 0

5126(स.नाला)

37 0

4533(स.रास्ता)

4535

4535मिन

4545 3. जेठाना

4524

4526

4529

}

88 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 20 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

तहसील : पीसांगन

9503

जिला : अजमेर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

3 1

4546 3. जेठाना (जारी...)

4546/1

4583

4589

4590 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

6 0

50 0

97 0

4590मिन (स. बरड़ा)

4588

4591

4602 }

70 0

4612(स .बरहा)

4613

4618 0

4620मिन

4620/1 0

4620मिन

3803(स. रास्ता)

4325

3874

3871

3870

3869

3867

3862

3868

3865

3864

3847

3843

3844 0

24 0

25 0

40 0

09 0

20 0

55 0

36 0

80 0

3844मिन

3840(स.भूमि)

3839

3838

3837 0

52 9504

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] तहसील : पीसांगन

जिला : अजमेर

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 2

6 3. जेठाना (जारी...)

3836

3850 (स.रास्ता)

3765

3765मिन

3764(स.खान)

3766

3766मिन

3745(स.रास्ता)

3699

3699/1

3699मिन

3696

3697

3695

3689(स.खान)

3688

3688मिन

} :

2922

3687

3651 (स.भूमि)

3650 (स. रास्ता)

3649

3575(स. रास्ता)

3574(स.भूमि)

3573 (स. रास्ता)

3568

3566

3565

3563

3562

2974

2975

2975मिन

9505

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : अजमेर

तहसील : पीसांगन

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

2976 जेठाना (जारी ...)

क्षेत्रफल

मीटर

वर्ग

एयर

हेक्टेयर

2994मिन

2993

2992

2992/1

2985 }

2985मिन

2986

3013

3014(स.भूमि)

3019 (पी.डब्ल्यू, डी. सड़क) ।

2950(पी.डब्ल्यू, डी. सड़क)

2826

2825

2824

2823

2809

2807

2806

2797

2798

2805

2799

2787(स.भूमि)

3068

3070 (स.भूमि)

3071 (स.भूमि)

3065

3076

3077

91 0

3077मिन

3092 }

0 9506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसील : पीसांगन

जिला: अजमेर

राज्य: राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 3. जेठाना (जारी...)

3078

3078मिन

3091

3089

3088

3087

3086

3085

3313(स.रास्ता)

3121

3122

3123

3312

3124

3311

3272

3274

3270

3275

3269/5412

3267

3263

3264

3259

3259/5413

3257

3258

3240

3239

10.

3238

76 4. मकरेड़ा

2449

2448

2451

2447

2434

32 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

तहसील : पीसांगन

9507

जिला : अजमेर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

2452 4. मकरेड़ा (जारी ...)

2433

2432

2431

2462

2428

2427

2467

2426(स.मोरी)

2409

2410(स.पाल)

2411

2425(स. रास्ता)

2475

2476

2477

2480

2495(स.रास्ता)

2496

2498

2499

2501

2502

2503

2506

2510

2511

2513

2512

2515

2516

2523 (स.रास्ता)

2306

2305

2304 राज्य: राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

6 0

81 0

84 0

78 0

14 0

37 0

45 0

44 0

97 0

62 0

67 0

96 0

00 0

66 0

41 0

15 0

41 0

63 0

14 0

45 0

58 0

53 0

41 0

34 9508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] तहसील : पीसांगन

जिला : अजमेर

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 2

6 4. मकरेड़ा (जारी...)

2301

2302(स.बरड़ा)

1612

1611

1613

1580(स.भूमि)

1513

1511 (स.भूमि)

1510(स.भूमि)

1508 (स.नाला)

1484(स.बरहा)

1462

1457

1455

1454

1438

1439

1427

1424

1425

1410

1391

1392

1387

1386

1385

1384

1383

1377

1382

1378

1221 (स. रास्ता)

1222

13.

1095

1094

22 [भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

9509

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

तहसील : पीसांगन

जिला : अजमेर क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

1093 4. मकरेड़ा (जारी...)

1079

1096

1097

1078

1077

4 5. अर्जुनपुरा खालसा

1मिन

84(स.रास्ता)

106

137मिन 6. शिवपुरा

137मिन (स.भूमि)

138

138मिन (स.भूमि)

138मिन 3530 GI/2004-29

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 0

38 0

65 0

20 0

14 0

95 0

08 0

65 0

08 0

32 0

40 0

20 0

97 0

66 0

18 0

66 0

18 0

25 0

97 0

90 0

18 0

20 10

19 0

20 0

47 0

56 0

20 0

15 }

15 9510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA20, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसील : पीसांगन

जिला : अजमेरे

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 6. शिवपुरा (जारी...)

140 (रेलवे विभाग)

146

147मिन

[फा. सं. आर-31015/57/2004-ओ.आर-।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th December, 2004

S. O. 3153.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority , Mundra -Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, 16 Krishna Vihar, Near Narayan Niwas , Gopalpura Bye-pass Road, Jaipur Pin- 302018 (Rajasthan) .

9511

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11, 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

State : RAJASTHAN

District : AJMER

Tehsil : PISANGAN

Khasara No. Sr. No

Name of the Village

11 GOLA

Area

Sq.mtr .

Are

Hectare

30(G/L Nala)

28(G/L)

26(G/L)

49(G/L Barda)

76min

。

}

90(G/LBarda)

105(G/LBarda)

104

103

106

102

100

15.

255(G/L, Barda)

256

257

272

271

269

0 9512

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : PISANGAN

District: AJMER

State: RAJASTHAN

Area

Name of the Village

KhasaraNo.

Hectare

Are Sq.mtr. 2

6 1. GOLA ( Contd... )

270

274

282

280

279

279Min(G/L)

{

296(G/L Barda)

297(G/L)

298(PWD Road)

423

420

421

422

424(G/L Barda)

387(G/L Barda)

613

612(G/L. Barda)

611(G/L Barda)

620

}

620Min(G/L)

609(G/L. Barda)

607

607Min

。

}

608

603(G/L Cart Track)

592

593

593Min(G/L)

}

599

601

624(G/L Cart Track)

786

791

792

790(G/L Barda)

75 9513

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District : AJMER

Tehsil: PISANGAN

Khasara No. S No

Name of theVillage

801 1. GOLA ( Contd ...)

803

Area

Sq.mtr.

Are

Hectare

804(G/L)

805

812

813

814

816

820

821

822

823

52 0

。

}

823Min

815(G/L Nala)

914

。

}

914Min

900

902

1163

1164

1165

1174

59 0

90 0

95 0

1176(G/L)

1295

1296

1294

1293

1299

1300

1301

1291

1290

1302

1303

1304

36 0

45 0

94 0

39 0

0 9514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : PISANGAN

District : AJMER

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

6 1. GOLA ( Contd ... )

1305

1311

1312

1247

1248

1238

1239(G/L)

1239Min

} 。

1240

10 2. SAMALA

5010

5013

5012

5024

5028

5023(G/L Cart Track)

5018

5021

5135(G/L Nala)

5134

5134 Min

5123Min

5117

5116

5111(G/L)

5125(G/L Cart Track)

5128

5127

5126(G/L Nala)

4533(G/LCart track)

4535

。

}

4535Min

4545

70 3. JETHANA

4524

4526

4529

88 9515

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11, 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District: AJMER

Tehsil : PISANGAN

Khasara No. No

Name of the Village

4546 JETHANA (Contd ... )

4546/1

4583

4589

4590

Area

Are Sq.mtr. Hectare

{

4590Min(G /L Barda)

4588

4591

4602

4612(G/L Barda)

4613

4618

4620Min

4620/1

4620Min

3803(G/L Cart track)

4325

3874

3871

3870

3869

3867

3862

3868

3865

3864

3847

3843

3844

3844Min

3840(G/L)

3839

3838

3837

92 0

40 0

0 9516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : PISANGAN

District : AJMER

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

6 3. JETHANA ( Contd ... )

3836

3850(G /L Cart Track)

3765

3765Min

3764(G/L Mines)

3766

3766Min

3745(G/L Cart Track)

3699

3699/1

3699Min

3696

3697

3695

3689(G/LMines)

3688

3688Min

}

2922

3687

3651(G/L)

3650(G/L Cart Track)

3649

3575(G /L Cart Track)

3574(G/L)

3573 (G /L Cart Track)

3568

3566

3565

3563

3562

2974

2975

2975Min

9517 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District : AJMER

Tehsil : PISANGAN

Area

Are

Khasara No.

Sq.mtr. No

Hectare

Nameof the Village

2976

3. JETHANA (Contd ...)

2994Min

。

}

2994Min

2993

2992

2992/1

2985

2985Min

2986

3013

3014(G/L)

3019(PWD Road)

}

2950(PWD Road)

2826

2825

2824

2823

2809

2807

2806

2797

2798

2805

2799

2787(G/L)

3068

3070(G/L)

3071(G/L)

3065

3076

3077

3077Min

3092

3530 GI/2004-30 9518

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA20, 1926 [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : PISANGAN

State : RAJASTHAN

District: AJMER

Area

S No

Khasara No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. Name of the Village

3078

3. JETHANA (Contd ...)

3078Min

3091

3089

3088

3087

3086

3085

3313(G/LCart Track)

3121

3122

3123

3312

3124

3311

3272

20.

3274

3270

16 64

3275

3269/5412

3267

3263

3264

3259

3259/5413

3257

3258

3240

3239

3238

76 4. MAKRERA

2449

2448

2451

2447

2434

32 9519

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण. 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District : AJMER

Tehsil : PISANGAN

Khasara No. S No Nameof theVillage

2452 4. MAKRERA (Contd ...)

2433

2432

2431

2462

2428

2427

2467

Area

Sq.mtr.

Are

Hectare

2426(G/LMori)

2409

2410(G/L Pal)

2411

2425(G/L CartTrack)

2475

2476

2477

2480

2495(G/L Cart Track)

2496

2498

2499

2501

2502

2503

2506

2510

2511

2513

2512

2515

2516

100

: 018

201

2523(G/L Cart Track)

2306

2305

2304

28.

9520

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] Tehsil: PISANGAN

District : AJMER

State: RAJASTHAN S No Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr. 1

6 4.

2301

MAKRERA (Contd...)

07 12

2302(G/L Barda)

1612

1611

1613

1580(G/L)

1513.

1511(G/L)

1510(G/L)

1508(G/LNala).

1484(G/L Barda)

1462

1457

1455

1454

00 68

1438

1439

1427

1424

1425

1410

1391

1392

1387

1386

1385

1384

1383

1377

1382

1378

1221(G/L Cart Track)

1222

1095

1094

22 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1093 4. MAKRERA (Contd...)

1079

1096

1097

1078

1077

4 5. ARJUNPURA KHALSA

1Min

9521

84(G/L CartTrack)

106

137Min

6. SHIVPURA

137Min(G/L)

}

137Min(G/L)

138

138Min(G/L)

138Min

140(RailwayDeptt.)

146

147Min

[No. R-31015/57/2004-0.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

9522

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA20, 1926

[PART II SBC. 3 (ii)] श्रम मंत्रालय

ORDER

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3154.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ.सी.आई. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ ( संदर्भ संख्या 37/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को16-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 22012/417/ 1999- आई.आर. ( सी एम- II ) ]

TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour, New Delhi vide his order No. L-22012/417 /99/IR( CM- II) dated 5/7-6-2000 referred to following issue to presiding Officer, CGIT - cum-Labour Court, Lucknow for adjudication; Whether the action of the Sr. Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Lucknow in imposing the penalty dt. 21-3-95 upon Sh. Taufiz Ahmed, A.G.I. (Depot) and the penalty dt. 23-11-98 passed by the Distt. Manager Food Corporationof India, Haldwani were Legal and Justified? Ifnot, to what relief the Workman is entitled to?" एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 16th November, 2004

S.O. 3154.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 37/2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workman, received by the Central Government on 16-11-2004 .

[No. L- 22012/ 417 / 1999 - IR (CM- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

The matter came up for settlement of dispute in Lok Adalat and accordingly the matter was taken up in the preliminary sitting of the Lok Adalat. It was proposed on behalf ofthe Management that if the worker represents against the punishment order to the appointing/reviewing authority the management may consider the matter sympathically. The worker accordingly acted upon the suggestation in preliminary sitting and preferred appeal before the Appellate Authority. The management considered the entire facts and passed the order No. Vig. 5 (161 / 104/04 - NZ/UP/MJR/ 2583 dt. 8 /11-10-04 . The management has set aside the punishment order dt. 21-3- 95. The representative of the management has stated that the worker does not want the penalty dt . 23-11-98 to be adjudicated . The representative of the worker Sri T.B. Singh's statement has been recorded. He stated that no claim award be passed in the case . Since the matter has been resolved in Lok Adalat , therefore no claim award passed accordingly.

ANNEXURE

Lucknow 5-11-2004 SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COUR, TLUCKNOW

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2004

Present in Lok Adalat

Shrikant Shukla PresidingOfficer L.D. No. 37/2000

Ref. No. L -22012/ 417/ 1999 - IR (CM- II) dated 5-6-2000

का. आ. 3155.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोल ( संदर्भ संख्या 101/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । BETWEEN The State Secretary

[सं. एल.- 22012/457/1998- आई.आर. ( सी एम- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th November, 2004 Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karmchari Sangh , 5-6 Habibullah Estate Hazratganj , Lucknow

AND

The Sr. Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, 5-6, Habibullah Estate, Hazratganj , Lucknow (U.P. )

S.O. 3155.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 101/1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, ASANSOL as shown in the Annexure 9523 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

in the Industrial Dispute between the management of ECL and their workman, received by the Central Government on 16-11-2004.

[No. L-22012/457/1998- IR(CM-II))

In pursuance to the aforesaid order of reference summons were issued to the concerned both the parties through theRegistered Post and in compliance to the same, both the parties appeared through their representatives and submitted their respective written statement in support oftheir claims.

N. P. KESAVAN, DeskOfficer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

Present: Sri Md. Sarfarz Khan, Presiding Officer.

2. The case of the workman in brief compass as setforth in its written statement is that Allauddin Mia, Belt Operator of New Kenda Colliery was the permanent employee ofM/ s. ECL having U.M. No. 97905. He went on authorised leave from 2-3-94 to 25-3-1994 and to that effect he submitted a medical certificate from a Psyschiatrist. R.M.A. Kanke Ranchi . When he was declared fit to resume his dutyhe reported to his office but he was not allowed to resumehisduty.

Reference No. 101 of 1999

Parties: The Agent, New Kenda Colliery of Kenda Area ofM/ s . E.C.L. , P.O. Bahula, Distt. Burdwan.

Management.

Vrs.

Allauddin Mia, Belt Operator of New Kenda Colliery

Workman

3. The main case of the workman is that he was chargesheeted on 23-4-95 and he submitted his explanation called for the Management . It is his definite case that he fell illat his native village and got treated by Medical Officer, Chitra Colliery situated near his home and thereafter by M.O. of Palajori , But when he did not recover he was taken by his brother to Ranchi for treatment. He was under the treatment during the aforesaid absence period and information in this regard and about the extension of leave was sent by the Registered Post to the management .

REPRESENTATIVES :

Shri P.K. Das , Advocate,

FOR THE MANAGEMENT :

4. It is also the case of the workman that during the course ofenquiry proceeding also he was ill and was under the treatment at Kalla Hospital ofECL.

: Shri Rakesh Kumar,

FOR THE WORKMAN

General Secretary, Koyala Mazdoor Congress, Asansol.

: Coal,

INDUSTRY

: West Bengal.

State

Dated, the 12th October, 2004.

AWARD

5. Even the enquiry officer did not find him fully guilty as the charge was partly proved. Agent New Kenda Collieryhadalso recommended for a light punishment for reversion from Cat- II to Category- I but the same was not considered at this Area level and he was dismissed from service by the General Manager, Kenda Area. His further case is that his absence was beyond his control and the same was purely on the medical ground for which medical certificatewas submitted . The punishment is claimed tobe harsh and disproportionate for the nature of this misconduct alleged so he has sought the relief for reinstatement with full back wages with all the consequential benefit.

Inexercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1 ) and Sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Government. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its order No. L-22012/457/98/IR(CM- II) dated 3-8-1999 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

6. Likewise the defence case of the management as per its written statement is that the reference itself is not maintainable in the eye of law and is misconceived one,

7. The main defence case of the management is that Sri Allauddin Mia, Ex-belt Attendent was absenting from his duty since 26-3-94 without prior permission or "Whether the action of the management of New Kenda Colliery of Kenda Area of M/s . ECL in dismissing Allauddin Mia, Belt Attendent from services is legal and justifiied ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?" 9524

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

12. The record on perusal goes to show that none of theparties has examined any personas oral witness rather some Xerox copies of the documents' have been filed on behalf of both the respective parties in support of their claims.

13. Xerox copies of the charge-sheet , Enquiry proceedings , enquiry report and the order of dismissal of theworkman have been filed by the side of the management . These documents are neither challenged nor denied by the side of the workman rather the same may be deemed to be admitted one.

information to the autority concerned and for that he was chargesheeted vide No. Pers/NKC/ CS /95-555 dated 24-4-1995 U/ S. 18 (1 ) (N) of the Model Standing Order applicable for the establishment . The workman is said to had appeared and participated in the enquiry along with one Co-worker to defend his case. The enquiry officer submitted it enquiry report with the finding that the charges . ofmisconduct have been established against the workman and the disciplinary authority after considering the said report along with other connected paper, awarded punishment of dismissal from service which is claimed to be just and proportionate to the misconduct committing by the workmen.

8. The alleged Medical certificate issued from Ranchi is a false and procured one and no such intimation was ever communicated or sent to the management by the concerned workman .

14. Similarly on the her hand the workman has also filed the Xerox copies of the note sheets initiated by thà Agent , New Kenda Colliery recommending some punishment, mercy petition addressed to the G.M. , Kenda Area, Letter of dismissal, Reply of second show- cause notice , applications of Allauddin Mia, Receipts of the Postal Department in support of the claim in respect of the informationgiven to the management, and Xerox copies of the prescription and medical bills .

15.Now let us see as to what are the charges framed and how for the punishment passed by the management is proportionate to the alleged nature of the misconduct , so proved against the delinquent workman ?

9. It is the definite case of the management that the concerned workman did never fell ill at his village home nor he got treated at Palajori or at Chitra Colliery at Ranchi and had never applied for extension of leave to the management. It is also denied that the enquiry officer had ever been convinced to allow the medical ground of the workman and had recommended light punishment. The punishment awarded is claimed to be proper and justified as the management has lost its confidence upon the poor performance of the workman . So the workman does not deserve any relief sought from the Tribunal.

16. From the record it transpires that there is a charge of absenting from duty since 26-3-94 and continuing to remain absent till date without any information and permission or without any sufficient cause under section 17 (1) (N) of the Coal Mines Standing Order.

1. 10. It transpires from the ordersheet at 13-3-2003 of the record that a hearing was made by my predecessor on the preliminary point and the enquiry proceeding was held to be valied and fair and thereafter the dispute was fixed for final hearing on merit on 27-3-2003 which was accordingly takenup by me after myjoining .

17. It is very much clear from the enquiry report itself submitted by the enquiry officer that he had verified the papers (Ext. 1 ) and found correct that the workman was granted leave from 2-3-94 to 25-3-94 as per Form H, SI . No. 6 page No. NIL but he failed to report for his duty on 26-3-94 and overstayed his sanctioned leave . It is also admitted by the enquiry officer that the workman had informed to the Colliery authority about his inability to report for duty. It is further opined by the enquiry officer that the workman overstayed his sanctioned leave due to sickness as per medical certificates. The only fault found on the part of the workman was that all the information made to the authority was without mentioning the actual disease and he did not sick permission from the authority for outside treatment .

11. It is apparent from para 1 of the written statement filed by the management that it has taken a plea that this dispute referred is bad in the eye of law and that same is neither maintainable nor it comes under the ambit and scope ofthe Industrial Dispute Act. But the said point was neither raised nor pressed by the side of the management during the course of hearing of the dispute . No evidence either oral or documentary has been produced before the Court inthis regard . As such I am satisfied to hold that there is no any defect in the maintainability of this reference and facts of the dispute without any shadow of doubt comes under the purview and scope of the Industrial Disputes Act and the dispute has been rightly referred to this Tribunal by the Government of India , Ministry of Labour for the adjudication . Accordingly this point is decided against the management.

18. It is also admitted by the Enquiry Officer that all information were sent through Registered Post as per receipts and envelops which area available from the colliery office seems that the information made time to time about inability ofjoining duties and requested for extension of 9525 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

past records of service of the workman and turned a deaf ear to the recommendation of the lenient view to be taken in the case of the delinquent workman . The disciplinary authority must have recorded the separate findings and reasons before passing order of dismissal.

21. It is the well settled principles of law that before imposing punishment of dismissal it is necessary for the disciplinary authority to consider the family back ground, economic back ground ofthe delinquent, length ofservice put in by the employee , his past records and other surrounding circumstances including the compelling circumstances for committing the misconduct. The delinquent is a member of the weaker section of the society who is literally and financially very mor and he has suffered immense hardship for about a dade and during these period he had never been gainfully employed any where after his dismissal.

leave. The only fault is that no reasons were mentioned in the information sent by the workman and accordingly the enquiry officer held that the charges against Sri Allauddin Mia, Belt Attendent is hereby established partly. So in view of the document filed by the management it is established and well proved that this is not a case of unauthorised absence from the duty rather it is a case of overstay under the compelling circumstances which has been fully explained by the workman and the same has been duly considered by the enquiry officer during the enquiry proceedings. Besides this the workman has all the time clearly mentioned in his leave applications , that due to illness he was not in a position to join his duty and it is never expected from a labour class to know the nature of the disease from which he suffers . The Medical certificates granted by Psychiatrist R.M. A. Kanke , Ranchi , and other Doctor go to show that the workman was suffering from depression and was advised regular treatment till recovery w.e.f. 8-4-94 to 14-5-95.

19. The enquiry officer has further held that the workman had not reported to the company's hospital for his mental disorder treatment or he had not taken any permission for entire treatment . I do not find so much force in this ground to hold the workman partly guilty for that charges as it is the human conduct and nature to rush up to the Doctor easily available and quickly approachable in case of emergency to save the life at the earliest . Specially in a case of mental disorder or depression one would like to prefer to approach an specialled Doctors which has been done by the workman who approached Dr. M.K. Sinha, Psychiatrist of Kanke , Ranchi . So in view of the above facts and circumstances it is established that the workman was on sanctioned leave and overstayed thereafter due to the suffering by mental disorder for which his treatment continued as per the advise of an Specialled Doctor .

22. Besides this under Section 27 ( 1 ) (page - 15) ofthe Model Standing Order applicable to the establishment, various minor punishment have been provided but I fail to think as to why only maximum punishment available under the said clause should be awarded on the facts of this case. I am of the considered view that justice must be temperedwith mercy and that the workman at fault should begiven an opportunity to reform himself and prove to be loyal and disciplined employee of the management . However I am ofthis view that the punishment of overstay after the expiry of sanction leave due to sickness supported with medical certificates under the compelling circumstances and without any ulterior motive and malafide intention, is too harsh a punishment which is totally disproportionate to the misconduct alleged. It is a plain and simple case of overstay which should have been dealt withby taking a lenient view by the management . In that viewofthe matter I think it necessary to modify the penalty imposed by the management to meet the ends of justice . And as such the impugned order of the dismissal of the workman is hereby set a side and he is directed to be re instated with the continuity of service . Hence having considered the basis on which the punishment of dismissal was imposed on the workman concerned and the facts and circumstances of the case I think it appropriate that the workmanbe imposed a punishment ofdemotion from Cat. II to Cat . I along with a strict warning. It's further directed that the delinquent will be entitled to get only 50% of the backwages which will serve the ends ofjustice . As such it is hereby ordered that let the award be and the same is passed accordingly. Copies ofthe award be sent to Ministry ofLabour for information and needful. 1

Mohd. SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer 20. During the course of argument it was submitted by the learned lawyer of the workman that the past record ofthe workman are clean and unblamished which has been admitted by the Agent ofNew Area, Kenda Colliery. The attention of the Court was also drawn towards the Note Sheet dated 29-11-95 (Ext. I) filed by the workman where it is specifically mentioned that there has been no past record of punishment against such misconduct and had strongly recommended for awarding a punishment of demotion from Cat. II to Cat. I as with a final warning and should be allowed to resume his duty. I find such force in the argument advanced by the side of the workman. I fail to understand as to why and under that circumstances a contradictory stand of defence other than the admitted facts have been takenby the management in its written statements . It seems that the management even did not care to go through the findings of the enquiry report and completely ignored the

3530 GI/2004-31 9526

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3156.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर- II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 177/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-42011/32/96- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th November, 2004 S.O. 3156.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 177/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CPWD and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-11-2004.

[No. L -42011 /32/96 -IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

I.D. No. 177/97

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI

In the Matter of:

Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha C/o General Secy. , CPWD Karamchari Union , C-15 ,Gole Market, New Delhi - 1

Versus

AIR

Executive Engineer, ( Elect ) Electrical Division- II , Soochna Bhawan , AIR, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi -03

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 42011/32 / 96- IR (DU) Central Government Dt. 21-10-1997 has referred the following point for adjudication. The points runs as hereunder:-

"Whether the demands of the workman Sh . Sanjay Kumar Jha, Fire Cell Operator, allegedly working for CPWD in Soochna Bhawan of AIR for reinstatement with back wages etc. is justified and legal ? If so , what direction is needed in this regard"

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] The claimants has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman has been engaged by the management of the All India Radio with effect from 15-9-95 as an Air Cell Operator whichjob is for maintenance and to up -keep of the various fire fighting equipments and also to maintain the temperature of the building at a particular temperature so that the building is not prone to fire hazards . This process . is a continuous process to be carried out perpetually and in a perennial manner as otherwise the building will be exposed to fire hazards.

That the workman was reportedly engaged through a contractor by name Kalyani System Engineers Rohini , Delhi without any legal authority or sanctions . That the employers have never paid the workman even the minimum wages overtime allowance and other allowances from the beginning even though the workman was put to work for over 8 to 16 hours a day.

That when the workman protested requesting for payment ofproper minimum rates ofwages as well overtime allowances for working overtime regularly he was threatened ofdire consequences and ultimately on 16-12-95 he was asked not to come for work with effect from 17-12-95 .

That when the workman began to seek the reasons for such atrocities in a peaceful manner by sitting outside the premises he was physically beaten and removed from the place and the security guards were told not to allow him to enter.

That not less than three fresh workers were taken subsequently as Air Cool Operators which proves and confirms that the termination of the workmen is not due to want of a vacancy nor is the workmanjunior most .

That consequently the workman had to register an FIR with the SHO of Lodhi Colony Police Station on 26-12-95 . Earlier the workman also made representation to the management direct on 19-12-95. A copy of the letters to the management as well as to the Police (FIR) is annexed to thisclaim.

That the workman also represented to the Commissioner of Police and the CBI about the atrocities perpetrated onhim by the management and the contractor in the most unusual and peculiar manner.

That even though the contractor has no locus standi inthe matter because the nature of work is perennial and of a perpetual and continuous nature and it cannot be stopped as the safety of the premises directly depends on his working. The Management has been trying to disown their responsibility and shift the same on the contractor . That the attitude of the management is not at all correct because in a perennial nature of work no contractor could be employed and no contract labour can be engaged in such a nature of work as the same is prohibited in the enactment itself.

That in fact the management has in the beginning offered their remarks/ comments on the representation of 9527 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

theworkman in their letter dated 9-7-96 copy of which is also annexed. That it may be seen that the management have not denied any of the allegations ofthe workman in it.

requires three number of helpers having two years of. experience and one number technician with III certificate in electronics electrical with three years experience of early fore alarm fire fighting sprinkler system in addition of it a service engineer would be visiting every week giving its report and as such the claim of the claimant as fore cool operator is an imagination of the claimant . Whereas the agency vide its letter No. KSE/G -7 (i ) Site/96-97 dated 9-4- 96 addressed the claimant as trainee helper.

That in the view of the above facts narrated viz . that the nature ofwork being perennial and the fact that contract labour is prohibited from being employed in such a nature of work and which nature of contract system is described as a ' Sham' by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in their judgement dated 9-5-95 in the case of Gujarat Electricity Board V/ s Hind Mazdoor Sabha AIR 1995 SC pages 1893 to 1922 .

That consequently the workman is a workman of the AIR as he was working in the establishment under the ExecutiveEngineer (E) II Civil Construction wing. All India Radio 2nd Floor . Soochna Bhawan , New Delhi is a perennial nature ofwork and the management is the AIRwho is his employer and the services of the workman were terminated because he demanded payment of proper wages and payment of overtime allowances for the overtime he worked.

That the contract with Kalyani system (contractor) was for a stipulated period and also no such job as alleged by the worker was subject matter of the contract. Even the letter dated 1-4-96 written by the claimant to the management itselfcontradicts the claim of the worker qua management . The claimant has malafidely converted its money claim against its employer M/ s Kalyani system into an Industrial Dispute with the respondent. The claimant was never employed by the management and has never worked for 8 to 16 hours a day and was not an employee of the department and as such question ofbonus minimum wages overtime allowances does not arise .

That the only fault that the workman committed as it would appear from the above which led to his termination is that he demanded proper minimum wages and over time allowances for the overtime work he worked .

The management has filed written statement. In the written statement, it has been stated that the workman's claim is totally false and based on frivolous facts . The claimant is neither a worker under the ID Act nor the respondent is an Industry under the ID Act. That the claimant is not an employee of the respondent and has no locus standi to file any claim against the respondent .

That the worker was never engaged by the management so there is no question of termination by the respondent . There is no engagement in the capacity ofAir CoolOperator with the respondent after the worker's alleged termination and all the allegations in FIR dated 26-12-95 are after thought and false averments and at the same time claimant's representation to the Commissioner of Police and CBI is false qua management as nothing of that sort has ever happened . The claimant instead of filing claim against its contract has falsely filed the present Industrial Dispute where neither the nature of work is perennial and perpetual and continuous nor there is any post as such alleged by the worker with the respondent. The worker was never under the direct supervision of the respondent and the respondent has never confirmed allegations of workman.

That the claimant never worked under the supervision or direct control of the respondent . He was never on the pay roll of the respondent . There is no relationship of employer employee between the claimant and the respondent . The work alleged to be done by the claimant was never done at the instance of the respondent and the post alleged by the claimant is not available with the respondent and the claimant is a stranger to the respondent.

The question of termination of the claimant does not arise as he was never engaged by the respondent and moreover in view of the contract labour ( regulation and abolition) Act; 1947, no claim is maintainable in favour of the claimant.

That the worker has been gainfully employed even after his alleged termination and the same is evidencedby its cross examination . The series of admission is cross examination has exposed the false case of the worker and the worker instead of giving a stop to its illegal activities of forging documents has even dared to file an application beforethi Hon'ble Foram in the name ofCPWD Karamchari Union (Regd. ) whereas the complete matter has been contested in the workers ' name .

That all the documents relied by the worker are pieces offorgery and manipulation. The letter dated 19-12-95 is also one of them . That the claim of the claimant is not maintainable as the terms with the contractor qua respondent was for stipulated period and as such no claim whatsoever is maintainable .

The claimant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his claim . The management has denied most of the paras of the statement of claim and has stated that he was a contractor's man and there was no relation of employer and employee between the management and the workman applicant .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

That the claimant was never employed by CCW, AIR asfire cell operator. The respondent has specific requirement for comprehensive maintenance of fire fighting system and EFA was riser sprinkler system and pump and for that it 9528

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART I-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर- II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 70/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/71/92- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 16th November, 2004 It was submitted from the side of the workman that the workman applicant was initially taken into service on 15-09-1995 through contractor and he was asked on 16-12-1995 not to come . Even though he was appointed through a contractor, he worked under the control and supervision of the management . The work is ofperennial in nature. He worked in the premises of the management. My attention was drawn to AIR 1995 - SC, 1992 and it was submitted that the contractor's man will deem to be the employee of the management if the work is of perennial in nature.

S.O. 3157.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 70/93) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court No. II, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Director General ofCivil Aviation and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-11-2004.

[No. L-42012/71/92 -IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT - IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

LD . No. 70/93

PresidingOfficer : R. N. RAI IntheMatter of: Sh . Ghanshyam Dass , Through the Secretary, National Confederation Central Government Employees andworkers , No. 10, Dr. Bishamber Dass Marg , NewDelhi - 110001 .

Versus

It was submitted from the side of the management that really there was a contract with Kalyani System Engineers and the workman applicant was sent through the contractor. The contractor took work from him and there was only a dispute regarding payment of wages and by annexure -D, the workman applicant was informed to approach the authorities so that the payments through contractor may be made to him. Annexure - E also shows that the workman applicant was annoyed with the contractor as he took more work from him and did not pay to hinı the wages according to his work . Annexure -F shows that the workman has complained against M/ s . Kalyani System Engineers , New Delhi and he has stated in the complaint that he has not been paid entire emoluments. Annexure-G shows the agreement between the contractor and the management . From perusal of these papers , it transpires that the workman applicant was engaged by the contractor and a contract was given for a very short time irregular recruitment is made for that work and the contractor did not make proper payment to the workman applicant so he sent complaint letters to various persons . The management has neither made any payment to him nor he worked under the control and supervision of the management. The work is also not of perennial in nature. As such , the law cited by the workman applicant is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case . He was simply a contractor's man and he worked under the contract for less then three months so , he is not able to prove his case.

TheDirector General of Civil Aviation, EastBlock- II, III, R.K. Puram, NewDelhi - 110066.

The reference is replied thus :-

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L-42012/ 71/ 92- IR (DU) Central Government Dt. 20-9-1993 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The reference is replied thus :-

The demands of the workman Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha, FireCell Operator , allegedly working for CPWD in Soochna Bhawan of AIR for reinstatement with back wages etc. are neither justified nor legal . The workman is not entitled to any relief as prayed for.

The award is given accordingly. Dt. 5-11-2004

R.N. RAI , P'residing Officer

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 20014

The parties have filed an application for deciding the case in the Lok Adalat . The parties have settled the matter outside the court. In the Lok Adalat the signature was taken and the compromise was verified. There remains no longer any dispute between the parties in view of the compromise being verified in the LokAdalat .

No dispute award is given. Dt. 9-11-2004 .

का. आ. 3157.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डायरेक्टर जनरल ऑफ सिविल ऐविऐशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके

R.N. RAI , PresidingOfficer 9529 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2004

services were illegally terminated w.e.f. 15-4-94? If so, to what relief is the workman entitled to and from which date" .

का.आ. 3158.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आई.बी.पी.सी.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 86/96) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -20040/51 /95- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th November, 2004

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim, it has been stated that the workman was working with the management since 1990 as a Sweeper- cum -general workman and his last drawn salary was Rs . 1560/-. It is stated that the work and conduct of the workman was upto the satisfaction ofthe management and there was no complaint either regarding his performance or his conduct and behaviour. It is stated that the action of the management is absolutely illegal and unjust. It is stated that the management has not followed the procedure established by law before terminating the services of the workman. It is also stated that the workman isentitled for relief under the various sections of Industrial DisputeAct.

It is stated that the workman is still unemployed as he has not been able to get any other job despite his best efforts .

S.O. 3158. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 86/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, New Delhi - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of I.B.P.C. Ltd. and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 16-11-2004.

[No. L- 20040/51/95 - IR (C-I)]

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

Themanagement has filed written statement and in thewritten statement it has been stated that the applicant was not an employee of the management as alleged, much less since 1990 as a Sweeper-cum- general workman. It is also specifically denied that he was paid a monthly wage ofRs. 1560/-as alleged. Further more, it is wholly irrelevant that the work and conduct of the applicant was to the satisfaction of the management and /or there was no complaint regarding his performance and/or conduct and/ or his behaviour.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEWDELHI

I.D. No. 86/96

PRESIDING OFFICER: R.N.RAI .

In the Matter of:-

Sh . Kishan Pal

C/oVice President, All India Engineering And General MazdoorUnion, E- 127, Karampura, NewDelhi -15

Versus

TheManager, IBPC Ltd. Shakurbasti ,

Rohtak Road, Delhi-34 .

Itissubmitted that the applicant was an independent self-employed person . He provided the management services of cleaning , sweeping and grass cutting at the company'sdepot situated at Shakurbasti , Delhi , on a part time basis . The nature of work entrusted to the applicant was that of sweeping, cleaning and grass cutting . He was not a full time or regular employee of the management . In fact he used to frequently depute other persons to perform the job assigned to him by the management . The assignment of jobs was also based entirely upon the exigencies ofwork. There was no relationship of exclusive services to be provided by him to the company. In fact the applicant was providing similar services at other establishments also . In view of these facts and circumstances it is abundantly clear that the applicant is not a workman within the meaning , scope and ambit of Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947. Hence the alleged dispute raised by the applicant is neither legal nor tenable.

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 20040/51 / 95- IR (Coal- I ) Cantral Government Dt . 23-08-1996 has referred the following point for adjudication . The point runs as hereunder :-

The management is a Public sector undertaking and strictly complies with all statutory regulations . Hence the averments assertions and allegations made by the applicant in the corresponding paragraphs are specifically repudiated.

"Whether the union is justified in claiming that Sh. Kishan Pal was an employee of the management of IBPC Ltd. , Delhi and that his 9530

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

persons to perform the job assigned to him by the management.

He is put to strict proof of the same. It is admitted that the contract for providing service came to an end on 15th April , 1994, which was in accordance with the arrangement entered into by and between the parties consequently no notice was required to be issued to the applicant on that occasion .

The substantial question is whether the applicant is a workman of the management . The workman applicant has filed payment voucherdt . 31-7-1993 in which he has received Rs . 1560/- for 26 days work . Besides , these two vouchers , he has not filed any other paper.

Itis submitted that the action of the management is legal , valid and proper. It is reiterated that there was no employer employee relationship between the parties . In the circumstances , applicability of provision of the Industrial Disputes Act are wholly misconceived and not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case for reasons set out hereinabove .

It is reiterated that there was no employer employee relationship between the parties . Therefore the assertion of the applicant that he was unemployed is wholly irrelevant and untenable. In any event the applicant is put to strict proof of his assertions .

It was submitted from the side of the management that a letter was given to the workman applicant . He has put his signature over the letter and the paper is admitted. It isvivid from this letter paper No. 13 , that an agreement was made between IBP Co. Limited Shakurbasti , Delhi and M/s. KishanPal from 1-9-1993 to 28-2-1994 and it has been mentioned that M/s . Kishan Pal shall provide one man for cleaning/sweeping and grass cutting services in Shakurbasti Depot from 8.00 AM to 4.30 PM and the company will pay Rs . 60/- per day except Sundays and Holidays . M/s . Kishan Pal will be responsible for P.F. , Bonus, ESIC and other statutory payments . It transpires fromperusal of this paper that a contract was entered into betweenM/s . Kishan Pal and the management for providing one man for cutting grass , cleaning and sweeping.

The claimant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim . The management in the written statement has denied all the paras of the statement of claim. Evidence ofboth the parties has been taken .

Heard arguments from both the sides . It was submitted from the side of the workman that the workman applicant has been working since 1990 as sweeper- cum- workman and his last drawn salary was Rs . 1560/- per month . The management was not providing legal benefits to the workman such as appointment letter, leave book , earned leave and minimum wages . The workman was also not being regularised . When he demanded his regularisation and legal benefits , the management got annoyed and terminated his services illegally and unjustifiably w.e.f. 15-4-1994. No notice was given to him . No. compensation was given to him . He has worked for more than 240 days , as such section 25 (F) of the ID Act is attracted , He was an employee of the management of IBP Co. Limited, Delhi . He deserves to be regularised.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that it is the duty of the workman applicant to prove the assertions of his statement of claim . He has not filed paper to show that he was working from 1990. Voucher of one payment ofRs . 1560/- has been filed with the record. He has entered into agreement as paper No. 13 and he has put his signature so his work is contractual work . He has admitted paper No. 13 dt . 26-8-1993 . Besides , this paper of agreement, no other paper regarding his services with the management has been filed . As such, the workman applicant has entered into a contract with the management and he hasworked according to the contract and the management witness has also stated that they had engaged him on contract basis . My attention was drawn to 2002 LLR 1104 ofHon'ble Kerala High Court, I have perused the case law cited above . This case is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case . The workman applicant was a contractual labour and he has agreed to provide one workman for cleaning , sweeping and grass cutting as per the terms of the agreement . The terms of the agreement duly signed by the workman applicant and admitted by him is a very valuable piece of evidence . The workman applicant has filed no other paper to show that he was engagedby the management prior to 26-8-1993 , the date of agreement, As such , the workman applicant has failed to prove that he has worked for more than 240 days and he has also failed to prove that he was an employee of the management . As such, he has miserably failed to prove the case ofhis statement of claim .

The referece is replied thus :-

It was submitted from the side of the management that the workman has accepted in his cross - examination that he used to be paid Rs . 60 /- per day which was being paid to him per month on voucher . He did not submit any bill for that . He was not working anywhere during that period. He knows Devidass Keer. He was a permanent employee . He has not been paid for 15 days of the month when his services were terminated . It is wrong to say that he was working independently as contractor and he was paid on the basis of the work done . It was further submitted from the side of the management that the applicant was not an employee of the management as alleged and he was not working since 1990. He was not paid monthly wages of Rs . 1560/- . He was not a full time or regular employee of the management . He used to depute other

Theunion is not justified in claiming that Sh . Kishan Pal was an employee of the management of IBPC Ltd. , Delhi and that his services were illegally terminated w.e.f. 15-4-94.

9531 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ] '

And

The workmanwas neither the employee of the management nor his services have illegally been terminated, He is not entitled to get any reliefas prayed for.

1. The Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Allahabad

The award is given accordingly.

2. The Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Allahabad

Dt. 4-11-2004

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer

AWARD

नईदिल्ली, 17 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3159. औद्योगिक159.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नोर्दन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 53/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour New Delhi vide their order No. L- 41012 /5 / 04 -IR (B -I ) dated 7-6-04 referred the following issue for adjudication to the Presiding Officer, CGIT - cum-Labour Court , Lucknow: क्यामंडल रेल प्रबन्धक, उततर रेलवे इलाहाबाद द्वारा श्री गुलाब चन्द्र गुप्ता पुत्र स्व. श्री शिव प्रसाद गुप्ता, प्रधान पार्सल लिपिक को 1-1-84से वेतनमान रुपये 425-640 ( आर.एस. ) ग्रेड में पदोन्नति न करना न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का अधिकारी है ?

[सं० एल -41012/5/2004- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th November , 2004

S.O. 3159. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 53/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofNorthern Railway and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 16-11-2004.

[No. L-41012/5/2004-IR (B -I) ]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW

PRESENT

SHRIKANT SHUKLA

Although the order of reference was endorsed to Sri Dina Nath Tiwari Divisional Organization Secretary, Uttar Railway Karmchari Union, Kanpur and the employer Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Allahabad wasalso endorsed the copy of the order of reference . It was clearly indicated in the order of reference that the party raising the dispute will file the statement of claim with relevant documents alongwith list of witnesses within 15days ofthe receipt of the reference order . Though the orderofreference was received in CGIT -cum -Labour Court, Lucknow on 27-7-04 but the Divisional Organization Secretary did not file any statement of claim together with the list ofdocuments and list of witnesses upto 20-8-04. In the circumstances registered notice was sent to the divisional Organization Secretary on 23-8-04 . The registered notice has not been received back in the office ofCGIT -cum - Labour Court . Lucknow till 30-9-04 . It was therefore believed that Trade Union Divisional Orgainzation Secretary is sufficiently served, therefore on 30-9-04 another notice was issued to the empolyer by registered post fixing 27-10-04 for their written statement on the issue referred. The notice was despatched to the employer on 30-9-04 which has not been received back in the office of GCIT- cum-Labour Court, Lucknow till this datei.e. 2-11-04.

PRESIDING OFFICER L.D. No. 53/2004

In the circumstances stated above the issue can not beadjudicated by this court. Accordingly no claim award ispassed.

Ref. No. L-41012/5/2004- IR-B -I) dt. 7-6-04

LUCKNOW

Between

2-11-2004

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer Sri Dina Nath Tiwari , Divisional Organization Secretary, Uttar Railway Karmchari Union, 119/74 Qr . No. Naseemabad, Kanpur (U.P. ) 12 9532

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 17 नवम्बर, 2004

referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of the State Bank of India in terminating the services ofSh. Lala Ram, Clerk-cum -typist is just, fair and legal ? If not, what is the relief the workman is entitled to. "

का. आ. 3160.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 194/97) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In his statement of claim , it has been stated that he was a permanent employee of the State Bank of India . His services are governed by the modified Desai and Sastry Awards andby various Bipartite Settlements .

[सं . एल.- 12012/199/97- आई.आर. ( बी- I ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th November, 2004

S.O. 3160.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 194/97) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court II, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-11- 2004.

[No. L- 12012/ 199/ 97 - IR (B - I) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL- TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI

I.D. No. 194/97

Sh . Lala Ram

That during the corse of his employment, the workman was charge - sheeted by the Disciplinary Authoritydt. 27-2-1993 and Shri V.S. Agarwal was appointed as Enquiry Officer and enquiry was commenced against him . He fell ill and requested for adjourning the proceedings of the enquiry. It was adjourned for 10-06-1993. He was still sick but ex -parte enquiry was held. PEEX- 1 to 60 documents were produced by the Presenting Officer but those documents were not supplied to the workman applicant . The Enquiry Officer did not mention the venue of next hearing in his order of adjournment of proceedings . That on 17-6-1993 , the ex -parte proceedings were again held at the Okhla Branch and adjourned for 18-6-1993, with the following directions to the bank's representative from the Enquiry Officer. " The next date of hearing is fixed for 18-6-1993 at 11.00 AM at Green Park Extension Branch and the Presenting Officer was requested to produce the remaining witnesses thereat " . The enquiry on 22-6-1993 was held at 10.30 AM at Vikas Sadan INA Branch . The workman was never informed regarding any change of venue of the enquiry. He even did not know the date of the enquiry. The Enquiry Officer sent no notice regarding the adjourned hearing and change in venue . On 22-06-1993 the E.O. did not give any opportunity to inspect and cross examine the additional documents and evidence . No fresh notice or order was passed enabling the workman to examine the additional documents . The Disciplinary Authority did not forward the enquiry report to the workman before its consideration by him as the Disciplinary Authority. In AIR 1994 SC471 the Apex Court has held that :-

Through The Circle President, State Bank of India Staff Association , Delhi Circle, A- 50 , New Multan Nagar, Delhi-110056

VERSUS

"Where enquiry is held by an Officer other than the Disciplinary Authority and the report is adverse to the charged employee, a copy thereof should be supplied to the charged officer for his observation thereon , before the report is considered by the disciplinary authority. " The Deputy General Manager , State Bank of India , 11. Sansad Marg . NewDelhi .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 12012/ 199/97 - IR ( B - 1 ) Central Government Dt . 26-11-1997 has

In this case enquiry was held ex -parte and no copy ofenquiry report was provided to the workman applicant . Two hours notice was given to the workman on 10-06-1993 to attend the proceedings despite his being sick, is illegal . He was not given any time to inspect, examine 9533 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

or cross - examine the additional documents and the witnesses .

workman applicant was not given any opportunity to producehis witnesses in defence . It was further submitted from the side of the workman that from the enquiry proceedings dt . 25-05-1993 and concluded on 22-06-1993 , ittranspires that the E.P.A. was asked to present himself atthe hearing within two hours in his own erest but the workman remained absent for reasons best known only to himself. The enquiry was held at 1 PM on 10-06-1993 and the E.O. gave his findings on 07-10-1993.

The respondent management has filed written statement and in the written statement, it has been stated that 8 charges were framed against the workman and a proper enquiry was held. The workman was afforded sufficient opportunity to cross -examine the witnesses but he himself wanted to delay the proceedings so ex-parte proceedings were held . He was afforded sufficient opportunity to cross - examine the witnesses but he failed to do so . He was given opportunity to adduce evidence in his defence , but he adduced no evidence. The enquiry is quite fair and no interference is called for.

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . He has denied almost all the paras of the written statement as the respondents have denied almost all the paras of the statement of claim. In his rejoinder the claimant has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim so it is needless to re - produce the same again .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken and issue regarding the fairness of the enquiry committee had not been pressed. As such, the award is given on the entire records , nothing adduced during the proceedings of the enquiry as well as in the court and the pertinent documents filed on the record. It was subnutted from the side of the workman applicant that the management witness in court in his cross -examination has categorically admitted that the workman applicant was not informed of the change ofvenue and he was not afforded opportunity to adduce evidence in defence . The cross examination of the management witness runs as hereunder:-

Evidence of both the parties were taken. Shri V.S. Aggarwal , ChiefManager was produced from the side of the management and the workman examined himself. These two witnesses have been cross -examined by the relevant parties . The preliminary issue regarding fairness of the enquiry was not pressed before me , as such the award is given on the entire merits of the case considering the proceeding of the enquiry and the documents filed in the court and the oral evidence of both the parties.

"I am not aware of the fact that whether the workman was allowed to cross -examine the expert witness and he had actually cross -examined. It is correct that at the beginning of the enquiry proceedings on 10-06-1993 , the workman had verbally asked me to adjourn the enquiry proceedings on the ground ofhis illness. I do not remember whether any information regarding the change ofvenue of enquiry proceedings made on 17-6-1993 was given to the workman or not . If any such infromation would be given to the workman it would certainly have been mentioned in the enquiry proceedings. I do not remember whether at the time of the next change of venue of the disciplinary proceedings on 22-6-1993 , any information of itwas given to the workman or not . It is wrong to say that after completing my enquiry proceedings , I was in any manner associated with the disciplinary authority and the appellate authority in respect of the workman's case . After the close of the banks evidence no notice for the production of the defence evidence was given to the workman because the whole of the proceedings was held exparte against him.

The management witness has unambiguously stated that he did not remember whether any information regarding change of venue was given to the workman applicant or not . If such information had been given , it would have been mentioned in the proceedings . I have perused the proceedings . There is not mention regarding the change of venue and the information supplied to the workman regarding the same . It is obvious that the entire enquiry was proceeded ex -parte . Very short dates have been given and no notice has been given. Even no copy ofthe proceedings of the enquiry have been given . The workman applicant has categorically denied that he did Heard arguments from the both the parties and perused the papers on the record. It was submitted from the side of the workman that the enquiry officer who has been examined as MW1 / 1 has admitted in his cross- examination that he was not aware of the fact whether the workman was allowed to cross - examine the ex- parte witness or he had actually cross - examined. He has further admitted that it is correct that at the beginning of the enquiry proceedings on 10-06-1993 , the workman had verbally asked me to adjourn the enquiry proceedings on the ground of his illness . He has further admitted that he did not remember whether any information regarding the change of venue of the enquiry proceedings made on 17-06-1993 was given to the workman or not . In case such information could be given to the workman it would certainly have been mentioned in the enquiry proceedings. Hehas further admitted that he did not remember whether at the time of next change of venue of the disciplinary proceedings on 22-06-1993 , any information of it was given to the workman or not. He has further admitted that after the close of the bank's evidence , no notice for the production of defence evidence was given to the workman because the whole proceedings were held ex-parte against him. It is quite explicit from these admission that the entire proceedings of the enquiry were held ex- parte and the

3530 GI/2004-32 9534

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 19 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3161.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , असनसोल (संदर्भसंख्या 51/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-11-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

not get any notice regarding the date of enquiry and regarding the change of venue of enquiry. The first hearing was held on 17-6-1993 at Okhla Industrial Estate Branch . The workman applicant was not present . The next enquiry was held the next day i.e. 18-6-1993 at Green Park Extension Branch. There is no question of giving notice of the changed venue of the enquiry. The third enquiry was held on 19-6-1993 at the same place and the last was held on 22-6-1993 at Vikas Sadan . The workman applicant has not participated in the enquiry..

[सं० एल-22012/485/1999- आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 19th November , 2004

S.O. 3161. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 51/2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial -cum -Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and their workman, received by the Central Government on 19-11-2004.

[No. L- 22012/485 /1999 - IR ( CM - II) ]

N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS- TRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Sri Md. Sarfaraz Khan , Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO . 51 OF 2000

PARTIES : The Agent, Lachipur Colliery, Kajora Area of M/ s . Eastern Itwas submitted by the management that ex -parte enquiry is as good as contested enquiry in case the workman withdraws from enquiry and certain citations have been referred to by the management . It has been held in 2000 ( 87 ) FLR 231 that in case the employer has lost its confidence in the employee , the court cannot interfere with the same. In AIR 2000 SC 3129 , it has been held that ifthere is misappropriation whether that is large or small, reinstatement in service is not justified . In 1998 SCC page 1129 it has been held that non supply of enquiry report does not cause any prejudice to the employee . The law citedby the management is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case . It is settled law that principles ofnatural justice should be followed in an enquiry and the workman applicant should be afforded opportunity to produce witness in his defence . In this case , the entire enquiry is ex -parte and the management witness has admitted that the workman applicant was not informed regarding the change of venue of enquiry and no notice has been given to him . Though the alleged charges of embezzlement are very serious one , still enquiry should be conducted according to the principles of natural justice. The workman applicant should have been given opportunity to examine his defence witness but this has been done , as such , on the above findings , I conclude that enquiry is defective as principles of of natural justice has not been followed and the workman applicant has not been given opportunity to examine witness in defence and he has not been supplied copies of the enquiry report. The law cited by the management are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case .

P.O. Kajoragram,

The reference is replied thus :-

Coalfields Ltd. , Dist. Burdwan

Management

Vrs .

Workman

Sri Murali Behra , U.G. Loader, Lachipur Colliery

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the Management : Sri P.K. Das, Advocate .

The action of the management of the State Bank of India in terminating the services of Sh . Lala Ram , Clerk- cum -typist is neither just nor fair nor legal . The workman applicant is restored prior to the position of the award of the punishment. The management will conduct enquiry after giving him proper notice and affording opportunity to cross - examine the witnesses and the management will also afford opportunity to the workman applicant to examine witnesses in defence .

For the workman

The award is given accordingly. Dt. 9-11-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

:Sri R. Kumar, General Secretary, Koyala Mazdoor Congress , Gorai Mansion, G.T. Road , Asansol.

9535 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

STATE: WEST BENGAL ,

INDUSTRY : COAL.

AWARD

6. In the light of the above facts the relief has been sought to set -a - side the order of dismissal and to re- instate him in the service .

7. On the other hand the defence case of the management as per its written statement in short is that the instant reference is bad in the eye of law and the very dispute is misconceived one as the facts of the dispute do not come under the parametre of the Industrial dispute .

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section ( 1 ) and Sub-section 2 (A) of the Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Government of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its order No. L- 22012/ 485 / 99 /IR ( CM - II) dated 28-6-2000 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal .

"Whether the action of the management of Lachipur Colliery of M/ s . ECL in dismissing Sh. Murali Behra, Underground Loader from services is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

On receipt of the aforesaid order of reference , summons were issued to the respective parties through the Registered Post and in pursuance to the summons both the parties appeared through their representatives and filed their respective written statement in support of their claims.

2. The case of the delinquent workman in brief compass as set- forth in the written statement is that Murali Behra was a permanent employee ofthe Lachipur Colliery as an underground loader .

8. The main defence of the management is that Sri Bhim Mahto , Ex -Emplosive Carrier of Lachipur Colliery remained absent from his duty unauthorisedly without any prior permission or information since 16-12-97 for which he was issued a charge -sheet by the management on20-3-96 under clause 17 ( 1 ) (n) of the Model Standing Order applicable for the establishment. Since the workman failed to reply the charge -sheet , it was decided to hold a domestic enquiry and an independant enquiry officer was appointed who conducted the enquiry in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The workman was held guilty for committing the misconduct by the enquiry officer. It is claimed that the disciplinary authority having considered the findings of enquiry report , gravity of the misconduct and the past service record of the workman, passed an order of dismissal which is proper, just and quite proportionate to the misconduct proved against him.

9. It is denied that the workman was absent from his dutydue to his sickness and for that he was under medical treatment of any doctor. The workman is not at all entitled to any relief sought for.

3. The main case of the workman is that under a compelling circumstance he had to remain absent with effect from 16-12-97 as he was falsely implicated in a creminal case in which he was also arrested by the Police and put behind the bar. It was not possible to inform the authority concerned about this problem and consequently he could not attend his duty. But the management was duly informed in this regard by his family members .

10.On perusal ofthe record it transpires that a hearing wasmade on the preliminary point. The validity and fairness of the enquiry was not challenged by the workman and a prayer was made for hearing of the dispute on merit ofthis case. Consequently the enquiry proceeding was held tobe valid and fair and the hearing of the dispute was made on the merit of this case . The hearing was conducted and reserved for the award.

4. It is further pleased that since he could not receive the charge-sheet . So he could neither submit the reply to the charges nor could he participate the enquiry proceeding and the management was duly informed of this fact that he was under the custody ofOrissa Police and was put behind the Bar on 28-11-98 . Even then the workman concerned was dismissed from his service without giving him the opportunity to defend himself.

11. It is apparent from the perusal ofthe record that none of the parties has examined any oral witness from their side rather Xerox copies of some documents have been filed on their behalf in support of their case. The management has filed the Xerox copy of the charge-sheet, enquiry proceeding, enquiry report , dismissal order and the copy of the second show cause notice . These all documents are official letters which have not been challenged and as such they are deemed to be accepted one .

12. On the other hand from the workman side Xerox copies of the prescription (out door ticket) granted by 5. The award ofthe punishment of dismissal of the workman is claimed to be extremely harsh and disproportionate to the nature of the offence alleged against him. Inspite of the fact that the management had got the knowledge about his custody and pendency of the bail matter in the Court concerned, the management deliberately dismissed him from service . In the same set of facts and similarly situated circumstance , the case of so many workers have been considered earlier and were allowed to jointheirduties .

9536

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Health Centre , Laudaha w.e.f. 16-12-97 to 29-4-98.Xerox copy of the ordersheets of the S.D.J.M. Court through which the workman was released on bail dated 23-9-98 , Certified copy of the same issued on 6-2-99 , Xerox copy of the reply dated 12-2-99 of the second show cause notice issued on 16-1-99. Xerox copy of the Medical Certificate dated 12-2-99 and the Xerox copy of the statements submitted from the side of the management before the A.L.C. (C).

13.The first technical point taken by the management in para 1 of its pleading is that the dispute referred by Ministry of Labour for adjudication is itself bed in the eye of law and misconceived one and as such it is neither maintainable nor it comes under the ambit and scope ofthe Industrial Dispute Act . But unfortunately the said point was neither raised not pressed by the learned defence Counsel during the course of hearing of the dispute. No sorts of evidence either oral or documentry was tendered in the Court on this point . As such I am satisfied to hold that there is absolutely no defect or Lacuna in the maintainability of this reference and the facts of the dispute verywell without any iota of doubt comes under the scope of the Industrial Dispute Act. and the dispute has rightly been referred to this Tribunal by the Ministry of Labour for its adjudication . accordingly this issue is decided against the management .

14. From the perusal of the pleadings of the parties and the record it transpires that certain facts mentioned below are admitted'one .

19. The delinquent workman has admitted that he couldnot attend his duty on 16-12-97 under the compelling circumstances as he was sick during the relevant time and to that effect he has filed the photo copy of the medical certificates dated 16-12-97 , 4-2-98, 25-4-98 and 29-4-98 granted by the Doctor of Laudaha Block , Primary Health Centre, Laudaha , Bardwan who had diagonised that the workman was suffering from hepatitis and Jaundice. The Doctor concerned has granted a certificate dated 29-4-98 . thatMurali Behra the workman was suffering from Hepato Splememogali and Jaundice and was under his treatment from 16-12-97 to 29-4-98. The out door Tickets go tojustify the treatment of the said disease. The management has no where taken the plea that these documents fake and false nor any correspondence or verification report was called for from the said primary health center in this regard, so the genuineness of these documents remain intact and unchallenged and consequently it is established that the workman could not attend his duty under the compelling circumstance . So far the information about the sickness of the workman to the management is concerned . The workman has taken the plea that his family members had given the information to the authority concerned by any co-workmanbut in this regard specific date and time has not been given nor the name of the workman has been disclosed through whom the information was sent to the authority concerned. No oral or even a chit ofpaper in this regard has been filed by the delinquent, so it is at least clear that the workman was absent from his duty without any prior permission and no information was given to the authority concerned.

15. It is the admitted facts that Murali Behra, U.G. Loader of the Lachipur Colliery remained absent from his dutywith effect from 16-12-97 without any prior permission or information to the authority concerned for which a charge-sheet vide Ref. No. ECL/LAC/PC/IR/ C -6 /98 /6287 (B) dated 16-3-98 under Section 17 ( 1 )(n) of the Model Standing Order was framed.

16. It is further admitted fact that the delinquent workman did not appear and participate in the enquiry proceeding held on 28-11-98 and an ex - parte hearing ofthe enquiry proceeding was conducted.

17. It is also the admitted fact that a second show cause notice vide Ref. KA , PH, 0-6 , 10/1999/1384 dated 16-1-99 calling for explanation within five days was issued and ultimately the dismissal order vide Ref. K, PM, 0-6 , 10/ 5898/1822 dated 12-2-99 was passed.

18. Now let us see as to whether the delinquent workman deliberately made himself absent from his duty w.e.f. 16-12-97 and deliberately did not participate in the said enquiry proceeding conducted against him or not ?

20. It is the admitted fact that an ex - part enquiry proceedingwas held in absence of the workman . The report of the enquiry proceeding goes to show that the charge sheet dated 16-3-98 was sentby Registered Post to workman which was returned with the endorsement of the postal Deptt. that the " addressee absent" so re -directed to sender. So admittedly there was no legal service of the notice upon the workman in the eye of law so the question to reply the charge in absence of receipt of the charges does not arise and the workman cannot be held responsible for this . It is also admitted by Sri S.K. Banerjee M.R. in his statement before the enquiry officer that the notice of the enquiry proceeding was also redirected mentioning over the face ofthe envelop as a" addressee sent to Govt . Jail . " Besides this, to that effect, the workman has filed the copy of the order sheet of the Court of S.D.J.M. which go to show that the workman was arrested in a criminal case and remanded to Jail custody on 10-7-98 and was released on bail on 23-9-98 . So it was not possible to participate in the enquiry proceeding by the workman as the circumstance and the situation was beyond his control which was very well in the knowledge of the enquiry officer as well . It is admitted 9537 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/ अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

by the Agent of the colliery concerned in para 4 of the written statement submitted before the A.L.C. (C) , Raniganj dated 17-7-99 that the information about the arrest and custody of the workman was received in his office on 28-11-98 at 11.00 A.M. In such circumstance the ex-parte order should have not been passed and an opportunity to participate in the enquiry proceeding should have been given to the workman to meet the ends ofjustice .

very family back ground, economic back ground of the workman, length of service put in by the employee , his past records and other surrounding circumstances , including the nature of the misconduct. Admittedly the workman concerned is employed in the same since the year 1973 who is very poor and illiterate man. He has suffered about more than six years and he had never been gainfully employed any where during the period after dismissal .

21. The workman has filed the Xerox copy of the reply of the show cause notice issued on 16-1-99. The reply of the said show cause notice was filed on 12-2-99 over which there is an endorsement of the management side addressed to Sri P. Roy to " please discuss " but inspite ofthis fact the reply of the second show cause notice was not considered and ignored the same and the dismissal order was passed on the same day i.e. 12-2-99, which itself amounts to denial of natural justice.

22. Under the above facts , circumstance and the discussion made I am satisfied to hold that the workman was not given the sufficient opportunity to participate in the enquiry proceeding . But since there is admission on the part of the workman itself that he was absent from his duty since 16-12-97 to 16-3-98 without any prior permission and no information in this respect was sent to the Department concerned and the validity and fairness of the enquiry proceeding remained unchallenged, so the delinquent workman is hereby held guilty on this score U/s . 17 ( 1 )( n ) of the Model Standing Order applicable to the establishment.

26.Apart from this when the Model Standing Order applicable to the establishment provides U/ s . 27 (1 ) (page-15) various minor punishment 1 fail to think as to why only maximum punishment available under the said clause should be awarded in the present fact and circumstance of the case . It appears that the management has got no balanced standard of the yardstick to judge the gravity of the misconduct of the workman, to award penalty as per the provision of the Model Standing Order . It has been observed by the highest Court of justice that justice. must be tempered with mercy and that the erring workman should be given an opportunity to reform himself and tobe loyal and disciplinary employee of the management . However, I am of the view that the punishment of dismissal for unauthorised absence for a few months under the compelling circumstances and without any ulterior motive is too harsh a punishment which is totally disproportionate to the misconduct proved . Such a plain and simple case of unauthorised absence should have been dealt with by taking a lenient view by the management . In that of view of the matter I think it just and proper to modify the same to meet the ends ofjustice.

23.Now the main point to be considered by the Court is to see as to how for the punishment awarded for the workman by the management is just, proper and proportionate to the alleged nature of misconduct proved against him.

And as such the impugned order of the dismissal of the workman is hereby set - aside and he is directed to be reinstated with the continuity of service. In the light of the facts , circumstances and the basis on which the punishment of dismissal was imposed on the workman concerned, I think it appropriate that the workman be imposed a punishment of stoppage of two increments without cumulative effect . It is further directed that the delinquent workman will be entitled to get only 50% of the back wages which will serve the ends of justice . Accordingly it is here by ordered that let the award be and the same is passed. Secretary is directed to send the copies of award to the Ministry ofLabour for information and needful.

MD. SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer 24. During the course of argument it was submitted by the side of the workman that it is a simple case of unauthorised absence for about 3 months which in this case particularly cannot be said to be a gross misconduct as the reasons of absence has been very well explained and proved by the medical certificate. Even according to the provision of the Model Standing Order applicable to the establishment the extreme penalty of dismissal can not be imposed in such a minor type of misconduct which was beyond the control of the workman. I do find force in the argument of the workman side on nature of punishment imposed upon the workman.

नई दिल्ली, 19 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3162.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्केलाजिकल 25. It has been several times clearly observed by the different Hon'ble High Court and even by the Apex Court : itself that before imposing a punishment.dismissal it is incumbent upon the disciplinary authority to consider the 9538

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii) ]

what relief the workman is entitled?

सर्वे आफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक, अधिकरण कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 40/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-11-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-42012/304/1999- आई आर ( डीयू) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 19th November, 2004

2. It is unnecessary to give full facts of the case as on 5-3-04, when the case was taken up for hearing, the authorized representative for the workman instead of adducing the evidence of workman has submitted before the Tribunal that as the concerned workman is not turning up, hence he is not interested in prosecuting with the present case. He also made an endorsement under his signature to this effect . Before 5-8-04 the workman was given repeated opportunities for adducing his evidence but he failed to avail of the opportunity and did not adduce any evidence in the case.

3. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case discussed above , the Tribunal is left with no option but to hold that the workman is not interested to prosecute with the case and accordingly the workman is held not entitled for the reliefclaimed, for want ofevidence.

4.Reference is therefore decided in affirmative and infavour ofthe management .

S.O. 3162. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Archaeological Survey of India and their workman, received by the Central Government on 19-11-2004 .

SURESH CHANDRA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 19 नवम्बर, 2004

[No. L-42012/304/ 1999 -IR (DUJ KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

का.आ. 3163.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टेलीकाम डिस्ट्रिक्ट इंजीनियर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को19-11-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

BEFORE SHRI SURESH CHANDRA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, SARVODAYA NAGAR, KANPUR, U.P.

[सं० एल-40012/229/1992- आई आर (डीयू] Industrial Dispute No. 40 of 2000

[सं ० एल-40012/232/1992- आई आर (डीयू] In the matter of dispute between :

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी Sh . Sanjay Kumar S/o Sh. Chandra Kumar Sharma , Niwasi Shihuwadara , Post Bachchana Billour , Kanpur .

New Delhi , the 19th November , 2004 AND

Supdt. Archaeologist , Archacological Survey of India Ballie Guard Cottage Golaganj , Lucknow.

AWARD

S.O. 3163.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the CentralGov- ernment hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Indus- trial Dispute between the Employers in relation to the man- agement of Telecom District Engineer and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 19-11-2004.

[No. L-400 12/229/ 1992-IR (DU) ] 1. Central Government , Ministry of Labour, vide notification No. L -42012/304/99/IR (DU) dated 3-3-2000 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

[No. L-40012/232/1992- IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, Whether the action of the management of Archaeological Survey of India , Lucknow, in terminating the services of Sh . Sanjay Kumar is justified ? If not , to भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20 , 1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

TAMIL NADU, CHENNAI- 104

Wednesday, the 13th day of October, 2004 PRESENT: THIRU K. S. Venkatachalam, B.Sc.B.L. DTL , Industrial Tribunal INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NOS . 215 AND 216 OF 1994 (In the matter of dispute for adjudication under Sec .

10(1) (d) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 between the Workman and the Management of Telecom District Engineer Virudhunagar).

In L.D. No. 215/1994

Between

Shri M. Kannan,

C/o M.Murugaiah ,

CircleOrganising Secretary, NFTE-E4, (T.N. ), Cross Bar Exchange, Rajapalayam.

AND

The Telecom District Engineer, Virudunagar-626001 .

Reference: Order No. L-40012/229/92 - IR (DU) dated 19-5-1994, Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi.

In I.D. No. 216/1994.

Shri S. Dharmaraj,

C/o M. Murugaiah ,

CircleOrganishing Secretary,

NFTE, E-4, Cross Bar Exchange, Rajapalayam.

AND

The Telecom District Engineer, Virudhunagar.

Rererence: Order No. L-40012/232/92 -IR(DU) dated 19-5-1994, Ministry of Labour, Govt. of India, New Delhi .

These disputes coming on for final hearing upon perusing the reference , Claim and Counter statements and all other material papers on record and upon hearing the arguments ofTvl . P. V.S. Giridhar Associates , advocates appearing for Workmen in both the dispute and of Tvl. P. Arulmudi and P. Srinivasan , advocates appearing for the Management in both the disputes and these disputes having stood over till this day for consideration, this Tribunal made the following:

COMMON AWARD

In I.D. No. 215/94

9539 The Govt . of India has referred the following issue for adjudication by this Tribunal:

"Whether the action of the Telecom District Engineer, Virudhunagar in terminating the services of Shri M. Kannan w.e.f. 24-12-90 is proper, legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. The main averments found in the Claim Statement ofthe Petitioner are as follows:

The Petitioner was originally appointed as Casual Labourer under the Respondent , The Telecom District Engineer, Virudhunagar on 18-1-1986 . From the inception of his service, he has been discharging his duties in a sincere and dedicated manner. He has been rendering, service continuously until 24-12-90 . When the petitioner was expecting that he will be regularised from service and accommodatedagainst a Group -D post, much to his shock and surprise on 24-12-90 when he reported for duty, the respondent instructed him orally not to report for work any more.

3. When the petitioner questioned the respondent as to the reason for disengaging his services, the respondent refused to give any reason for the same. No orua was served on the petitioner. The petitioner made several representations requesting respondent to give employment. But the respondent simply informed the petitioner that re -employment could not be considered as per the existing rules of the department. So the petitioner preferred a petition for conciliation before the Asstt . Commissioner of Labour ( Conciliation) in the Office of Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) Madras on 30-3-1992 . As the Conciliation officer was unable to effect any settlement on account of unreasonable attitude adopted by the respondents the Conciliation Officer submitted a failure report on 3-12-1992 . Hence the reference.

4. The petitioner has put in more than one year of continuous service and as such he is entitled to the protection under Chapter V A of the I.D. Act. No notice was served on the petitioner before terminating his service and no retrenchment compensation was paid to him. So the termination is violative of Sec . 25F of the Act. The termination of the petitioner is also violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. Moreover the termination is contrary to the orders of the Deptt. of Telecommunication in its letter No. 269.10/89 - STN dt . 7-11-89.Hence the respondent is to be directed to reinstate the petitioner w.e.f. 24-12-90 withall consequential banefits, backwages , continuity of service , regularisation and other attendant benefits .

5. The main averments found in the Counter Statement of the Respondent are as follows:

9540

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)]

In LD. No. 216 of 1994.

TheGovt. of India has referred the following issue for adjudication by this Tribunal :

TheField Officers in the Telecom Department have engaged the petitioner for specific work and payment was made to the Petitioner in the contingent bills . As per the Departmental rules all the contingent bills more than 3 years old have been auctioned /destroyed. So the respondent is not in a position to verify the actual number of days worked from 10-8-1985 to 24-12-1990 as claimed by the petitioner in the Claim statement . The petitioner was not given an assurance for regular employment .

"Whether the action of the Telecom District Engineer, Virudhunagar in terminating the services of Shri S. Dharmaraj w.e. f. 24-12-90 is proper, legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

9. The main averments found in the Claim statement ofthe Petitioner are as follows:

The petitioner was oiginally appointed as Casual Labourer under the respondent the Telecom District Engineer, Virudhunagar on 10-8-85. From the inception of his service, he bad been discharging his duties in a sincere and dedicated, manner. He has been rendering service continuously until 24-12-90. When the petitioner was expecting that he will be regularised from service and accommodated against a group - D post, much to his shock and surprise on 24-12-90, when he reported for duty, the respondent instructed him orally not to report for work any more,

6. The Petitioner was engaged in the field for specific nature of work and was stopped after that work was completed. No appointment order is issued to those workers who are engaged for specific nature of work and paid in contingency pay bills. The petitioner was not recruited by respondent through the Employment Exchange . subordinate staff in the field units are empowered to engage labourers for specific nature of work and terminate them as soon as that work is stopped. The Dept. of Telecom, New Delhi vide letter No. 270-6/84 - STN dt. 30-3-1985 has issued orders banning and strictly prohibiting fresh recruitment and employment of casual labourers w.e.f. 30-3-85 for any type of work in Telecom Circles/Districts in the light of the orders of the Supreme Court directing the department to regularise all those casual mazdoor prior to 30-3-85 . Only Casual labourers already in employment for a single day prior to 30-3-85 should be engaged for work of Casual nature in the department. So the claim of the petitioner has to be dismissed.

7. The main averments found in the Addl. Counter Statement of the Respondent are as follows :

10. When the petitioner questioned the respondent as to the reason for disengaging his services , the respondent refused to give any reason for the same . No termination order was served on the petitioner. The petitioner made several representations requesting respondent to give employment. But the respondent simply informed the petitioner that re -employment could not be considered as per the existing rules of the department. So the petitioner preferred a petition for conciliation before the Asst . Commissioner of Labour ( Conciliation) in the Office ofRegional Labour Commissioner ( Central) Madrsa on 28-3-92 . As the Conciliation officer was unable to effect any settlement on account of unreasonable attitude adopted by the respondent , the Conciliation officer submitted a Failure report on 3-12-92 . Hence the reference.

The Petitioner produced for the first time employment certificates alleged to have been issued by Sub Divisional officers/ Junior Telecom officers of various divisions and various places . Except the Certificate dt. 4-10-88 in all other certificates Muster Roll Number and Work Order Number have not been mentioned . In the absence of both, the genuineness of the certificates cannot be verified and the petitioner is put to strict proof of the same . Even the Certificatedt. 4-10-88 requires verification. The authorities who are said to have issued those certificates have no authority to issue them . The petitioner has not fulfilled the requirements for the grant of temporary status as per The DGDOT letter No. 269-10-89 - STN dated 7-11-89 . The petitioner has not worked continuously for one year and as such he is not entitled to get TSM status and regularisation. Further the works stated to have been performed by the petitioner are entrusted to the regular workmen and the petitioner was not entrusted with any kind ofwork. The petitioner has not produced any material to show that he was engaged by the department and terminated from service . Hence the claim petition has to be dismissed.

11. The petitioner has put in more than one year of continuous service and as such he is entitled to the protection under Chaptar V- A of the I.D. Act . No notice was served on the Petitioner before terminating his services and no retrenchment compensation was paid to him . So the termination is violative of Sec . 25F. ofthe Act . The termination of the petitioner is also violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Indian Constitution : Moreover, the termination is contrary to the orders of the Dept. of Telecommunication in its letter No. 269-10/89 - STN dt . 7-11-89. Hence the respondent is to be directed to reinstate the petitioner w.e.f. 24-12-90 with all consequential benefits , backwages, continuity of service, regularisation and other attendant benefits .

9541 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

12. The main averments found in the Counter Statement of the Respondent are as follows :

15.On the side ofthe workman , the workman in both the Industrial Disputes have been individually examined as WW1 , In I.D. No. 215/94 on the side of the workman, 4 documents have been filed and marked as Exs. W1 to W4 through WW1. In I.D. No. 216/94 5 documents have been filed and marked as Exs . W1 to W5 through WW1 . On the side of the management , a Joint Memo has been filed on 30-8-2004 to record common evidence in both the I.D. Nos . 215 and 216 of 1994. That memo has been allowed and one witness has been examined as MW1 . Three documents have been filed and marked as Exs . Ml to M3 .

The Field officers in the Telecom Department have engaged the petitioner for specific work and payment was made to the petitioner in the contingent bills. As per the departmental rules all the contingent bills more than 3 years old have been auctioned/destroyed. So the respondent is not in a position to verify the actual number of days worked from 10-8-85 to 24-12-90 as claimed by the petitioner in the claim statement . The petitioner has not given an assurance for regular employment.

16. Points that arise for consideration : ( 1 ) Whether the action of the Telecom District Engineer , Virudhunagar in terminating the services of Shri M. Kannan w.e.f. 24-12-90 is proper , legal and justified? If not to what relief the workman is entitled ? (2) Whether the action of the Telecom District Engineer, Virudhunagar in terminating the services of Sri S. Dharmaraj w.e.f. 24-12-90 is proper, legal andjustified? If not to what relief the workman is entitled?

13. The petitioner was engaged in the field for specific nature of work and was stopped after that work was completed. No appointment order is issued to those workers who are engaged for specific nature of work and paid in contingency pay bills . The petitioner was not recruited by respondent through the Employment Exchange . Subordinate staff in the field units are empowered to engage labourers for specific nature of work and terminate them as soon as the work is stopped. The Dept. of Telecom . New Delhi vide letter No. 270-6 /84 - STN dt . 30-3-85 has issued orders banning and strictly prohibiting fresh recruitment and employment ofcasual labourers w.e.f. 30-3-85 for any type ofwork in Telecom Circles/District in the light ofthe orders of the Supreme Court directing the department to regularise all those Casual Mazdoor prior to 30-3-85 . Only Casual labourers already in employment for a single day prior to 30-3-85 should be engaged for work of casual nature in the department. So the claim of the petitioner has to be dismissed.

14. The main averments found in the Addl. Counter Statement of the Respondent are as follows:

17. Point Nos. 1 & 2 : A common award has been passed earlier in the instant two Industrial disputes along with a number of other Industrial Disputes on 30-12-96 by the then Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal who b deciding the preliminary point as to jurisdiction . He has dismissed all the Industrial disputes holding that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide the above Industrial disputes pertaining to Posts and Telegraphs Department . The petitioners herein and one Muthu the potitioner in I.D. 146/94 have filed Writ petitions in the Madras High Court challengingthe Common Award. The Hon'ble SingleJudge ofthe High Court while disposing ofall the three Petitions in W.P. Nos . 13882, 13883 and 13884 of 1997 in a Common Orderdt. 1-4-2004 has remitted in I.D. Nos . 215 and 216 of 1994 and 146/94 to the Industrial Tribunal holding that it has jurisdiction to decide the disputes in the light of a subsequent ruling of the Apex Court Between General Manager, Telecom Vs. Sreenivasa Rao S. and Others , reported in 1988 1LLJ 57.

18.After remand , witnesses have been examined on either side of the petitioner and the management and documents have been filed and marked . It is the contention ofthe petitioners in both the Industrial disputes that they have been appointed originally as Casual Labourers under the Respondent/Management of Telecom District Engineer, Virudhunagar and they have been in their service from 18-1-86 and 10-8-85 respectively. It is their common case thattheir termination of service is on 24-12-90 . The nature ofwork according to the petitioners examined as WWI individually is that they have to dig the ground, lay telelphone cables connect the cables , erect telephone poles and connect these poles with the cables. It is the identical evidence of those workmen that they had continuous work The Petitioner produced for the first time employment certificates alleged to have been issued by Sub Divisional Officers/Junior Telecom Officers of various divisions and various places . Except the Certificate dt. 4-10-88 in all other certificates ,Muster Roll Number and Work Order Number have not been mentioned . In the absence of both, the genuineness of those certificates cannot be verified and the petitioner is put to strict proof of the same. Even the Certificatedt. 4-10-88 requires verification. The authorities who are said to have issued those certificates have no authority to issue them. The petitioner has not fulfilled the requirements for the grant of temporary status as per the DG DOT letter No. 269-10-89 - STN dated 7-11-89 . The petitioner has not worked continuously for one year and as such he is not entitled to get TSM status and regularisation . Further the work stated to have been performed by the petitioner are entrusted to the regular workmen and the petitioner was not entrusted with any kind ofwork. The petitioner has not produced any material to show that he was engaged by the department and terminated from service . Hence the claim petition has to be dismissed.

3530 GI/2004-33 9542

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

through out the year with a break of 30 or 40 days . According to those witness their daily wages is Rs . 9/- . The 21 certificates of the petitioner in I.D. 215/94 which marked as Ex . W4 series and the corresponding 28 certificates of the petitioner/ workman in I.D. No. 216/94 marked as Ex . W5 series are employment certificates pertaining to the period from 1988 to 1990 with regard to the petitioner in I. D. 215/94 and for the years 1986 to 1990 with regard to the petitioner in I. D. No. 216/1994 .

19. The claim of the petitioners that they are in continuous service from the date of their appointment to the date of termination has been resisted and repudiated by the respondent in its Counter statement by pleading that the petitioners have not been in the continuous service of the department , but that there has been engaged in the field for specific nature of work and were stopped after the work was completed. It is the further case of the management , that payments were made to the petitioner in the contingent bills. The plea of the management that the petitioners were neither issued Appointment order nor served termination order is not disputed controverted by the petitioners in their Claim statement . Rebutting the oral evidence of the petitioners . with regard to their nature and status of employment , the evidence of MW 1 Junior officer of the department is :

other

language

Fortified and supported by Ex . M3 is the assertive evidence of MW1 that there is a prohibition for Casual labourer employment in the Department after 30-3-1985 . Εχ . M3 attested copy of the Circular issued by the Director General of Posts and Telegraphs dated 30-8-1985 mandates fresh recruitment and employment of casual labourer for any type of work to be stopped forthwith in the Telecom Circle District and the Casual Labourer already in employment to be utilised only for the work of casual nature , all installation work of temporary nature. cable laying work and line construction , dismantled work .

20. It is the case of the Management that they are not in a position to ascertain the period of service of the Petitioners due to the non - availability of the contingent bills since those contingent bills which are more than 3 years have been destroyed . The fact that contingent bills

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] relating to the petitioners which are more than 3 years are beingdestroyed has been proved by Ex . M2 marked through MW1 . So it transpires from the oral evidence of MW1 coupled with what is stated in the Ex . M2 that contingent bills more than 3 years will be destroyed , since the period of preservation of them is only three years . It is the categorical evidence of WW1 in each of the Industrial disputes that they have been in the continuous service of the respondent department for a period of 290 days in the year 1990. By way ofproving their service in the department, through those witnesses , Ex. W4 series and Ex . W5 series have been marked . Those documents are the series of the employment certificates . The genuineness and credibility of those employment certificates have been challenged by the management by submitting that they have no Muster Roll Number and Work Order Number. Evidently Exs . W4 series and W5 series those employment. Certificates are silent as to the Muster Roll Number and Work Order Number. So those Exs . W4 series and W5 series cannot be taken into consideration in computing the period of service of the petitioners . A cursory look of those documents reveals that the services ofthe petitioners in the department is not continuous , but with intermittent break of service . Moreover, it is disclosed that for the year 1991) , the petitioners had been in the service of the management only for a period less than 150 days . So there cannot be any truth in the evidence of concerned workman that he had been in the continuous service of the respondent for more than 290 days in the year 1990 .

21. So I find the available material on record sufficient to demonstrate and substantiate the three fold contention of the management that the petitioners were in the employment of the management less than 240 days in the year in which their services were terminated, their services were dis - engaged after the specific work for which they were employed was over, and they are not employees eligible for temporary status as per the Orders of the Department dated 30-3-1985 .

WHETHER THE TERMINATION OF THE SERVICES OF THE PETITIONERS W.E.F. 24-12-90 AMOUNTS TO RETRENCHMENT.

22. The termination of services of the petitioners w.e.f. 24-12-90 is being assailed and challenged legally as being violative of the provisions of Section 25F and 25N of the Industrial Disputes Act , on the ground that no notice was served on them before their termination and no retrenchment compensation was paid to them .

The Retrenchment is defined in Section 22 ( oo ) of the 1.D. Act as follows :

9543 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

dence on record, is the ruling ofthe High Court ofRajasthan in Between Garrison Engineer MES

And

"Retrenchment means the termination by the employer ofthe service ofa workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of dísciplinary action , but does not include-"

Central Industrial Tribunal & Anr. , "(a) voluntary retirement of the workman ; or

(b) retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in thatbehalf, or"

reported in 1993 II LLJ 850. The Burden ofproving con- tinuous service for a period of 240 days is on the part of the workman is the ruling of Apex Court in a land mark Judge- ment reported in 2002 III LLJ 1111 Between Essen Deiniki And Rajiv Kumar, wherein the observation of their Lord- ships is as follows :

"Industrial Disputes Act, 1947- Secs . 25 -B( 2) and 25- F- Actually worked under employer for not less than 240 days '-Meaning of it was for workman to prove completion of 240 days work . High Court com- ing to conclusion in favour of workman and setting aside Labour Court's contrary decision , held , not sustainable on basis of available evidence . " Section 25F of the O.D. Act which enables a retrenched workman to claim compensation lays down the conditions to be followed before effecting retrenchment. The learned counsel for the Petitioners invokes applicability of Section 25N of the I.D. Act to the facts of this case , since more than 1000 workmen are there in the employment of the management.

24. In the instant two disputes the authenticity of the employment certificates marked as Exs . W4 series and W5 series is being questioned by the management . As already stated supra those two documents are not adequate to prove the statutory requirement of 240 days of continu- ous service in the year 1990 in which they were thrown out ofemployment. :

23. The basic requirement to claim compensation in the case of retrenchment is that the workman has to be in the employment of the industry for a continuous service of not less than one year. Continuous service is defined in Section 25 (B ) ( 2) sub clause (a ) ( ii ) of the I.D. Act that for a period of one year if the workman during a period of 12 Calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made has been actually under the employer for not less than 240 days . With regard to the concept ofcontinuous service, I find it relevant to refer to a Full Bench ruling of the Madras High Court reported in 1991 I LLJ 155 Between State Bank of India , Madras

Aruling of the Madras High Court which squarely applies to the facts of this case of termination after the specific work is over , is the ruling that is reported in 1975 I LLJ 207 Between Crompton Engineering Co. (Madras) Private Limited And Additional Labour Court , Madras and others , wherein it has been held as follows:

And

1. Central Government Industrial Tribunal . Madras

2. State Bank of India Employees ' Union ,

wherein it has been observed as follows:

"Industrial Disputes Act , 1947- Casual and temporary employees-Termination of service on expiry ofperiod for which employed Whether can claim reinstatement- Held , no rule or law contemplates such employees must be given work again by employer-Casual employees engaged for a long time or on numerous occasions , whether make anydifference. "

"Industrial Disputes Act . 1947- Secs . 25 - B , 25F- Continuous service Meaning of Secs . 25B( 1 ) and (2 ) are independent-Actual working for 240 days dur- ing a period of 12 months is sufficient to inake con- tinuous service for a period of one year. No neces- sity for subsistence of contract of employment dur- ing entire period of 12 months. "

25. The learned counsel for the Petitioners in support of his submission that the termination of the petitioners amounts to retrenchment relies upon a recent Supreme Court ruling reported in 2003 Labour and Industrial Cases 2273 Between S. K. Nilajkar and Others , Vs. Telecom District Manager , Karnataka . In that ruling, the observation of the Division Bench is as follows :

"Industrial Disputes Act ( 14 of 1947) Ss . 2 (oo ), 25 -F, 25 -FFF- Termination of project employees.- Whether retrenchment on account of closure of The mere statement in the Cross -examination that the work- man has rendered 240 days of service cannot lead to the conclusion that the workman had rendered that service in a period of 12 months immediately preceding the date of termination of service of him in the absence of any evi- 9544

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

W.W. 1 Thiru M. Kannan (Petitioner)

In I.D. 216/94

W.W. I Thiru S. Dharmaraj (Petitioner)

In I.D. Nos. 215/94 & 216/94

ForManagement

M.W. I Thiru Rajah.V.

DOCUMENTS MARKED

In I.D. 215/94

undertaking-Workers engaged as casual labourers by Telecom Deptt. for discharging temporary job under a project . Termination of their services on project coming to an end- Failure of employer to allege and prove that termination of employment fell within sub - cl . (bb) of cls . ( oo) of Sec . 2-Closure of project or scheme by State Govt . therefore amounts to closing down of undertaking under S. 25 - FFF- Termination amounts to retrenchment-Workmen entitled to compensation under cl . (b ) of S. 25 -F which shall not exceed his average pay for 3 months . "

2000 (6) Kant LJ 327 , Reversed .

ForWorkman

Ex W1 Application filed U/s 2A of the I.D. Act by Thiru M. Kannan before the Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Central) Chennai - 6 ( copy)

W2 Reply by the Respondent -man- agement

Conciliation Failure Report

" W4 series Employment certificates issued to Thiru M. Kannan (xerox copy)

In I.D. No. 216/94

ForWorkman

W1 Application filed U/s 2A of the 1.D. Act by Thiru S. Dharmaraj before the Asstt . Labour Com- missioner ( Central) Chennai - 6 (copy)

Though the facts in that reported case is similar and identical to the facts in the two Industrial Disputes in that both cases , workers engaged as Casual labourers by Telecom Department for discharging temporary job have been terminated a distinguishing feature in the instant two cases is that the termination of the petitioners is not as a result of closure of a project or scheme . It is also not the case of the petitioners that there is a closure of project or scheme by the Government and that has resulted in the ousting of the job of the petitioners . Moreover, in the cited Supreme Court ruting , the concerned workman have completed 240 days of service in the year of termination. So. that Supreme Court ruling can not be applied to the facts of this case . The other rulings cited by the learned counsel for the petitioners in AIR 1960 SC 610, AIR 1999 SC 355. 1993 ( 3 ) SC Cases 250 ( 4) SCC 619. have no relevancy to the fiicts of this cute and as such they are not relied upon.

Counter statement of Respon- dent management ( copy)

W3 24-10-92 Reply to counter by Petitioner- Worker Th . S. Dharmaraj ( copy)

W43-12-92 Conciliation Failure Report (copy)

W5 series

26. So on a meticulous perusal of the available materials on record. coupled with application of statutory provisions . the relevant case Law, I am constrained to held that the termination of the services of the petitioners in both the Industrial Disputes 1. D. Nos . 215 and 2-16 of 1994 w.e.f. 24-12-1990 does not amount to retrenchment attracting retrenchment compensation, the termination of their services being proper, legal and justified.

Employment Certificates issued to Thiru S. Dharmaraj ( xerox copy)

In I. D. Nos . 215/94 and 216/94

ForManagement

Ex MI 4-8-2004 Authorisation letter 27. In the result, award is passed holding that the termination of their services of Sri N. Kannan in 1.D. No. 215/94 and S. Dharmaraj in I.D. No. 216/94 w.e..f. 24-12-9t) is proper, legal and justified, disentitling them to any relief. Industrial Disputes dismissed . No. costs .

M2 Extract of Volume III

Dated at Chennai , this 13th day of October . 2004

Telecommunication Financial Handbook Part 1 -Engineering Appendix. 3 ( xerox copy ) K. S. VENKATACHALAM, Industrial Tribunal.

M3 30-3-1985

WITNESSES EXAMINED

In I. D. 215/94

For Workman

Letter from Director. Office of the Director General , Posts & Telegraphs regarding engage- ment of Casual Labour ( xerox copy) 9545 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 22 नवम्बर, 2004

training of Shri J.P. Gupta . Technician Gr . III (Elect .) on 12-08-1991 is proper and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to" .

का. आ. 3164.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन ऑयल का. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रमः न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 73/95) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20040/30/94- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

The claimant has filed statement of claim. In the statement of claim, it has been stated that the applicant was appointed on the post of Telephone Operator on 1-9-1981 and he has been interviewed for the post of Telephone Operator and in the letter, it has not been mentioned that the post is of single cadre or no promotion would be given to him . The post of Telephone Operator is like other post and it is implied that he would be promoted like the other employees of the department.

एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 22nd November, 2004

That the workman applicant was not promoted upto 1987 whereas the other employees of the Refinery were promoted after the service of 2 years . At that time , the period for promotion was 2 years . The post of Telephone Operator in view of the technical work comes under skilled workman and the workman applicant should have been promoted in 1983 but he was not promoted.

S.O. 3164. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 73/95) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court New Delhi - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of 1.O.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 22-11-2004.

That on 27-8-1987, the post ofthe workman applicant Telephone Operator was changed and a new designation Telephone Operator-cum -Technician grade- IV Electrical given to him but he was working in the Telephone Section always as Telephone Section is under P&U Department. [No. L-20040/30/94-IR(C- 1 )] S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

That on 21-10-1987, he was promoted and he was again posted against the post of Technician Grade- III Electrical , he changed post but the workman was working athis original post . He has not given consent to the Refinery for the change of his post .

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT-II NEW DELHI

PresidingOfficer : R. N. RAI

LD. No. 73/95

Sh. J. P. Gupta Care ofMathura Refinery Mazdoor Sangh, 2/118, Refinery Nagar, Mathura-281006

That after 2 years the Refinery sent himto M/s. Uptron India Ltd. , Lucknow and got him trained for Digital Telephone Exchange , Telestar - 200- EPABX at the cost ofthe department itself and he has completed the said training and the workman was also included in the training ofthe Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. in April , 1991 and hewas called to Mathura and he was included in Telephone Exchange Training . He has worked from 21-10-1987 to 21-8-1991 for 4 years regularly at the post of Telephone Operator.

Versus

The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. , Mathura Refinery, Mathura.

AWARD

That applicant has got the experience ofTelephone Operator for 15 years and he has got against certificate of different type of Telephone Exchanges . He has 10 years experience ofworking in the Telephone Exchange in the Refinery and his real experience is of discharging the duty of Telephone Operator and he has been trained for the same purpose .

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L-20040/30/ 94- IR (B - I) CENTRAL GOVERNMENT Dt . 4-7-1995 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The points runs as hereunder :---

That his nature of work was changed without his promoton and he was asked to work on Thermal Power Station. He was compelled to do the duty of the Electrician without his consent and he has to work in the switch gear room in switch yard of 33,000 Volt high tension lines . After making several representations, when the Refinery paid "Whether the action of IOC Ltd. , Mathura Refinery, Mathura to change the nature ofjob without proper.

9546

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3( ii) ] heed to this request, he filed a case before the Labour Commissioner and the same was referred to this court .

section falls under the power and utility department ofthe respondent. It is emphatically denied that the workman was entitled for promotion after working for 2 years in the 1983.

That he is entirely un- experienced and un- skilled in discharging the duties of electrician . That the employees taken into service alongwith him have been promoted.

That the workman applicant is mentally tortured and his future is in utter darkness. He is illegally and arbitrarily transferred from one post to another.

The management has filed written statement. In the written statement , it has been stated that the present dispute has become infructuous and not maintainable in view of the fact that the concerned workman who was promoted as Technician grade- III (electrical) on 21-10-87 has further been promoted in the year 1994. It is apparent that now he has sufficient and enough on the job training to work in the electrical department and as such the dispute is liable to be rejected.

The workman was redesignated and placed in grade- IV (electrical) under the power and utility department. It wasmade clear in the order that it was done for the career progression of the concerned employee, It is submitted that it was to give benefit to the workman and keeping in view the future promotion chances his designation was made that of telephone operator cum technician grade- IV (electrical) . Thereafter on 21-10-87 he was promoted to technician grade- III (electrical). It is noteworthy that in the promotion letter issued to Sh. Gupta, it was mentioned that till time no telephone operator is appointed or deputed he would continue to perform the existing job. This does not in any manner show that he was not to work in the electrical department.

The management as a model employer and keeping in view the better career prospects of the employees does send them for further traning to acquint and update themselves of the new methods and technology. It is however stated that after the change of the designation of Sh. Gupta for his career progression he continued working inthe power andutility department. In fact thejob assigned to him w.e.f. 12-8-91 was of a technical nature which could be performed by a person of his technical/professional experience.

That the management has further stated that in case Sh. J.P. Gupta is not interested to work on the promoted post oftechnician grade - III ( electrical) w.e.f. 21-10-87 as was doneby the management , he would have tobe demoted backto his original post in the earlier pay scale and as such no relief is due to Sh . Gupta under the present terms of reference. It is emphatically wrong and denied that the present dispute is in connection with regard to the "Unfair Labour Practice" . It is submitted that under the present terms of reference the Hon'ble Court is not to decide any case of unfair labour practice but is to decide the reference inaccordance with the terms of reference referredto.

It is stated that there were 4 telephone operators including the workman who were employed by the management between the period 1981 and 1983, it was a single cadre post and there was no career progression in the cadre. It was in accordance with rules that promotions are to be carried out in the corporation and the promotion policy is settled by way of an agreement with the union . All the employees including the workman are bound by the promotion rules and the policy as followed by the management and which is settled between the management and the union .

Sh. Gupta was working as technican in the electrical grade- IV and he was fully competent to perform the duties assigned to him by the management . It is stated that the assignment ofjob always the function of the management so long as it compatible with the qualifications and experience of the concerned employee. The fact that Sh. Gupta performed the said job from 1991 onwards and got further benefits of promotion further proves the fact that he was competent to enough to perform the said job either without specific training or with minimum on the job training. In any event if Sh . Gupta disputes his promotion and consequent posting in the electrical department , he would have to be forego his promotion and would have to be revertedback to his original post within the department subject to the availability of vacancy, if any.

It is stated that there is no rule which provides that after 2 years everybody would be promoted . As a matter of fact in 1987 , the recognised union took up the cause of telephone operators and pleaded that since there was no career progression for them it would be better if their cadre was changed to technician and having agreed to this understanding , the management in the year 1987, redesignate the telephone operators , including the workman as telephone operator cum technician grade IV ( electrical ) . The workman concerned also accepted that redesignation at that time and agreed to change of his cadre to electrical inpower and utilities department . It is noteworthy that this

It isemphatically denied that Sh. Gupta was forced and threatened to do the job in the electrical department. As submitted above , Sh . Gupta has already proved himself competent enough to perform the said jobs and has even earned promotion in his new job . It was to help Sh . Gupta in his future prospects and to avoid stagnation in his grade that his cadre was changed and he was redesignated as telephone operator cum technician grade -IV ( electrical ) in 1985 and thereafter promoted to technician grade - III (electrical ) in 1987. The concerned workman accepted the 9547 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

said posting and it was only in late 1991 and 1992 that he protested against the said posting by way of an after thought.

Department . He has completed promotion period on 20-04-1988 satisfactorily. The workman applicant has himself accepted the re- designation of his post as Grade- IV Electrical by letter dt . 27-08-1987 . As such, when the post was offered, he gave his acceptance letter. He was promoted to technical Grade- II (Electrical ) on 21-1-1997. He has undertaken training vide letter dt. 4-10-1989. In January, 1980 and February 1980, he has been given certificate that he has worked as Switch Board Operator satisfactorily and he can operate the írunk card also. It is on 19-12-1991 that he objected to the change of his re -designated post.

Sh. Gupta has made vague allegations that he has beendeprived of promotion . As a matter of fact , it was to help him alongwith similarly placed workman in his career progression that he was redesignated as explained above . The job of the telephone operator was a single cadre job and it was found with the understanding of the union that the cadre of telephone operators was changed to technicians and Sh. Gupta was promoted as technician grade-III (electrical) in 1987.

The subsequent events clearly show that Sh . Gupta has been doing the job and has been getting promotion from time to time as per the policy in vogue even in the said job. The allegations regarding the family being worried on account of his performance of his job in the electrical department have been made without having any foundation for the same. It may be stated that the other employees namely Sh . D.K. Chaudhary, Rajaram and Chhatra Pal Singh are working happily in the same status as Mr. Gupta has beenplaced.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that ifthe workman is not willing to work on his promoted post, he may be reverted to his initial post of Telephone Operator without any promotion benefits . The workman was not present on the date of arguments but he has submitted written arguments so it could not be ascertained whether hewanted to get himself back reverted to his initial post without any promotion or he wanted to retain the promoted post of Technician (Electrical ) . It was submitted from the side of the management that offer of the change ofpost was given to him and he willingly accepted it . He has worked as Technical (Electrical ) Grade . He has been given training . The post of Telephone Operator has no progression so the union also accepted the re - designation ofthe post ofTelephone Operator . As such, the workman applicant is estopped from raising any question as to his re-designated or promoted post , in case once he has willingly accepted the promoted post, and has availed himself all the benefits of that post.

applicant. There is no force in the argument of the workman The workman has always been a part and parcel of power and utility department. His single cadre post of telephone operator was abolished through a change in the electrical grade - IV and subsequently to grade - III in order to help him in his career progression with good intention. Itmay also be said that postings and placement ofpersonnel is always a management function which cannot be interfered with at the instance of the concerned workman who has shown no basis at all for challenging the same .

The reference is replied thus :-

The management has denied almost all the paras of the statement ofclaim .

The claimant has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder, he has reiterated the statements of his claim. Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

The action of IOC Ltd. Mathura Refinery, Mathura to change the nature ofjob without Proper training of Shri J. P. Gupta, Technician Gr. III (Elect. ) on 12-08-1991 is proper andjustified . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The award is given accordingly.

Dt.09-11-2004

R. N. RAI , PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3165.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दक्षिणी रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 80/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -41012/54/2002- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that he was initially appointed as telephone operator and he has got the training oftelephone operator. He was not told at the time of his appointment that the post carries no promotion . Employees recruited alongwith him in the IOC got promotions after two years but he was not promoted and from Telephone Operator, his postwas changed to Telephone Operator -cum-Technician, Grade- III . It is apparent from letter dt . 21-10-1987 that the workman applicant has accepted the post of Telephone Operator/Technician Grade- III . By letter dt . 5th August, 1994, he was promoted in the scale of 13 10-2735 Grade - IV. He has accepted Grade -III Electrical Sub Grade by letter dt . 5-8-1994. It is apparent from letter dt . 12-09-1981 that he was in the last pay scale of Rs . 360 in Public and Utility 9548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1926

New Delhi , the 24th November, 2004 S.O. 3165.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 80/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Southern Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-11-2004.

[No. L -41012/54/2002-IR (B - 1 )] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 6th October, 2004

PRESENT:

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. 80/2002 (In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d ) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of1947) , between the Management of Southern Railway and their workmen).

BETWEEN

Sri P. Rajendran

: Ist Party/Workman AND

II Party /Management 1. The Divisional Safety Officer Divisional Officer, Transportation Branch, Madurai.

2 The Divisional Railway Manager, Divisional Office , Personnel Branch , Southern Railway, Madurai.

3 The General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai .

APPEARANCE :

For the Workman

: Sri S. Ravi & D. Annibesant , Advocates

For the Management

:Mr. N.R. Rajagopalan & S.V. Vasantha Kumar, Advocates

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour videNotification Order No. L-41012/54/2002 - IR(B -I) dated 12-08-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

"Whether the action of the management of Southern Railway imposing the penalty of removal from the service to Sri P. Rajendran is legal and justified? If not, what relief he is entitled ? "

2. After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 80/2002 and notices were issued toboth the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:-

The Petitioner was working as sub - sweeper- cum- porter in Southern Railway Madurai Division . He discharged his duties sincerely, diligently. While so, on 1-7-94 a charge memo was issued to him for the absence from 1986 to 1994 and without giving him an opportunity to submit his explanation , domestic enquiry was ordered against the Peitioner. The Petitioner is a semi - illiterate and hewas not aware of the procedures ofthe domestic enquiry. The domestic enquiry held by the Respondent was not proper and it was conducted against the principles of natural justice . The Enquiry Officer has given a finding that the charges framed against him were proved and the disciplinary Authority issued an order dated 17-5-96 terminating the services of the Petitioner w.e.f. 31-5-96 . Against that order, the Petitioner preferred an appeal and the 2nd Respondent on 13-8-96 had confirmed the punishment ofdismissal and dismissed the appeal . Against the said order, the Petitioner preferred a revision and it was also rejected by the 3rd Respondent on 3-4-97 . Hence , he has raised a dispute before the Regional Labour Commissioner( Central ) and on its failure , the matter was referred to this Tribunal . Since the Enquiry conducted by the Respondent is not according to rules and procedure, the same is vitiated and the Enquiry Officer has also not noted the salient points raised by the Petitioner. The entire enquiry was conducted against the principles of natural justice and therefore , the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse . The Petitioner was not given a reasonable opportunity in the enquiry. Therefore, the termination is illegal , unjustified and contrary to the principles of natural justice and the Petitioner prays to pass an award in his favour to reinstate him in service with back wages , continuity of service and other attendant benefits.

4. As against this , the 2nd Respondent filed a Counter Statement and in that it is alleged that the Petitioner 9549 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

principles ofnatural justice . Based on the above improper domestic enquiry, the Enquiry Officer has given a finding on 25-8-1995 holding that the charges framed against hima are proved and without giving any sufficient time to submit his explanation to the findings , the Diciplinary Authority has wrongly terminated his service and even the Appellate Authority and Revisional Authority have also not applied their minds and concurred with the order of punishment of dismissal . Hence , he raised this dispute.

7. To substantiate his contention , the Petitioner examined himself before this tribunal as WW1 and marked six documents which are ( i ) appeal filed by him before the Appellate Authority, ( ii ) the order passed by the Appellate Authority, ( iii ) the order passed by the Appellate Authority on his mercy petition (iv) he has also filed a copy of 2A petition filedbefore Labour Commissioner, (v ) the statement ofobjection filed and (vi ) the letter from Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) with regard to failure ofconciliation report namely Ex. WI to W6 respectively.

has come to this Tribunal with unclean hands suppressing the material facts and events and hence , the claim is to be dismissed . The Petitioner was removed from service for his unauthorised absence . The Petitioner absented from duty for a period of 849 days between 27-4-86 and 4-4-94. It will reflect that the Petitioner was negligent , not sincere and not at all interested in performing his duties . The enquiry conducted against the Petitioner was in just and proper manner and he was given full opportunity to defend himself and only after going through all relevant records, the Enquiry Officer has given a finding that the charges framed against the Petitioner have been proved and the Disciplinary Authority has gone through the entire matter afresh and decided to give proposed punishment and after hearing the Petitioner, he has imposed the punishment of termination on the Petitioner and therefore , it cannot be saidthat the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority is illegal . Similarly, the Petitioner's appeal before the authorities and also revision have been rightly rejected by the Respondent authorities after going through all the formalities . The Petitioner was removed from service in the ycar 1996 and the Petitioner has raised the dispute only in 2002. Hence , it is submitted that he has gainfully employed in some other place and this petition is heavily barred by limitation. Hence, the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

5. In such circumstances , the points for my determination are-

(1) "Whether the action of the management of Southern Railway in imposing the penalty of removal from service on Sri P. Rajendran is legal and justified ? "

(ii) " To what relief the Petitioner is entitled? "

Point No. 1 :-

8. As against this, on the side of the Respondent/ Management one Mr. Joseph Jesudoss Dennis , the Assistant Personnel Officer of the Respondent / Management, Madurai Division was examined as MWI and on the side of the Respondent 12 documents were marked which are the copy of charge sheet issued to the Petitioner, a copy of order appointing the Enquiry Officer: copyof letter from Petitioner dated 5-1-95 and also a copy ofthe letter from Petitioner for defetice helper and the copy of the order of Enquiry Officer with regard to this letter; copy of enquiry proceedings and copy of report of the EnquiryOfficer were marked as Ex. M5 and M6 ; a copy of the letter calling for representation from the Petitioner and the copy of reminders dated 4-12-95 and 29-2-96 , acknowledgement card for the third reminder and also the penalty advice issued by Disciplinary Authority respectively.

9. The main contention of the Petitioner is that the whole enquiry was conducted against the principles of natural justice without affording sufficient opportunity to him. but, from the evidence and also from records in this case, it is found that this allegation is only a false allegation because, it is clear from the records that he was afforded ample opportunitics at the stage of enquiry . Though the Petitioner alleged that his request for assistance of a co- employce was rejected, it is clear that his request has been rejected only on the ground that the co-employee , whom the Petitioner has suggested for his defence.is another person who has unauthorisedly absented for duty and proceedings have been initiated against him and it is also clear that the enquiring authority has asked him to nominate some other defence representative even in the letter under Ex.M4.

6. The case of the Petitioner is that he was working as substitute sweeper cum porter in Southern Railway Madurai Division . While so on 1-7-94 he was issued with a charge memo stating that he was absented for duty for several days unauthorisedly from 1986 to 1994 and without giving an opportunity to submit his explanation the domestic enquiry was ordered to be conducted and in that enquiry, he was not given any opportunity to have an assistance of a co - employee and the Enquiry Officer has not followed the procedure of the domestic enquiry and lic has conducted the enquiry proceedings in a strange manner and he hiinself has assumed the position of Presenting Officer and had put leading questions to the witnesses and the enquiry was conducted in English and he being a semi - illiterate does not follow the English and therefore . he could not defend himself properly in the domestic enquiry and the enquiry was conducted against the

3530 G1/2004-34 9550

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

produced any documents to substantiate his claim before this Tribunal, as such, it is only mere allegation without any proof. therefore, the contention of the Petitioner that the entire domestic enquiry was conducted against principles of natural justice is without any substance.

12. Again, the contention of the Petitioner that he has not been given sufficient time to give reply to the enquiryproceedings, is also another false allegation. From the documents produced by the Respondent from 17-10- 95 to 29-2-1996, the Respondent/Management has asked the Petitioner to submit his representation with regard to the enquiry report . But, he has not given any representation or submitted any letter in this regard . Therefore, his allegation that he has not been given sufficient time to reply the enquiry proceedings is not correct.

13. Then, again on behalf of the Petitioner it was contended that awarding penalty of removal from service isdisproportionate to the gravity of the charges framed against him and only because he has been unauthorisedly absented for certain period, the major punishment should not be imposed on him . But, here again , I find there is no point in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner because ifany leniency is shown to the Petitioner, who is a chronic absentee , it will demoralise the morale of other employees.

10. It is the further contention of the Petitioner from the beginning that he has been compelled to accept the charges and all the proceedings were taken in English and since he is a semi - illiterate, he did not know anything about the proceedings and no copy of the proceedings was given to him and as such, principles of natural justice has not been followed. But, here again, I find there is no truth in the contention of the Petitioner because in the oral evidence, the Petitioner has clearly admitted that Enquiry Officer has asked the questions in Tamil but they were written in English and a copy of enquiry proceedings were given to him and he has received the same after putting his signature in that paper. But , subsequently he turned back and said that the railway authorities has received back the copy of enquriy proceedings from him. Similarly, he has admitted that the enquiry report was also given to him and it was obtained by the railway authorities subsequently. Though , he has stated that he was compelled to accept the charges , except the allegations made in the Claim Statement, there is no evidence to show that he has been compelled to accept the charges. In fact, from the enquiry proceedings , it is clear that he has denied the charges and hence the enquiry was conducted. No doubt, there is no separate Presenting Officer was appointed but merely because no Presenting Officer was appointed, it cannot be said that it vitiated the proceedings .

14. On behalf of the Respondent , it is contended that if any leniency is given to the Petitioner, who has absented continuously nearly 870 days and more , it will demoralise the morale of other employees , who in addition to their work, were forced to work continuously without any relief for hours and days together, and it will lead to serious reprecussion in work. It is the further contention of the Respondent that the work of the Petitioner is vital in nature and absenteeism will pave way for serious accidents and continuous work to other employees which lead to unsafe working conditions and serious accidents .

15. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent . Further, the learned counsel forthe Respondent has relied on rulings reported in 2001 LAB I.C. 3749 T. RAJENDRAN VS. CHIEF ENGINEER, TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD , wherein the Division Bench of the Madras High Court has held that "Under such circumstances , his towering absence for a period of about three years cannot be taken lightly and cannot beviewed as a pardonable misconduct . It is obvious that the appellant was outside India and was serving somewhere. The appellant raised a plea in his W.P. that he was attending on his ailing father for the period between June, 1986 and December, 1986 and that claim is obviously incorrect . Therefore , it is difficult to view the misconduct ofthe Petitioner in a mild manner. "

11. The next contention of the Petitioner is that the Enquiry Officer himself has assumed the position of PresentingOfficer and he has cross examined the Petitioner and also put leading questions to the witnesses . But , here again, I find there is no point in the contention of the Petitioner because it was not substantiated before this Tribunal that the Enquiry Officer has cross examined the Petitioner at any stage. No doubt, he asked whether the Petitioner is admitting the charges framed against him and since he denied, the witnesses were examined before him by producing documents . The documents are muster roll of the substitute sweeper - cum-porters under Traffic Inspector, Madurai of the Respondent/Management from 11-8-1985 to 10-12-1990, 1-1-1991 to 10-1-1993 and 11-1- 1993 to 10-6-1993 ; the next document is the particular with regard to his absence for the period from 10-9-93 to 10-2-94 andthe third document extract of pay ledger of substitute sweeper - cum -porters of traffic department of Madurai Division. It is the admitted case of the Petitioner that he has perused these documents . Though he has stated in the claim petition that the Enquiry Officer has failedto note that from 11-1-1990 to19-7-90 , he was kept out of duty as per order dated 29-12-89 by the Divisional Personnel Officer, Madurai and though he has stated that from 4-3-91 to 20-3-91 he has applied for leave and during the period from 11-8-91 to 13-5-92 he was on medical leave, he has not substantiated his claim either before the Enquiry Officer or before the Disciplinary Authority. Further, he has also not

16. Again, on behalf of the Petitioner it was contended that though the failure to appoint a Presenting 9551 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

For the I Party/Workman :-

Date

Ex. No.

Description

14-08-96

Xerox copy of the appeal filed by thePetitioner.

03-04-97

Xerox copy of the order passed by the Respondent.

09-07-98

Xerox copy of the order passed byRespondent on Mercy petition .

25-04-00

Xerox copy ofthe 2A petition filed byPetitioner.

20-10-00

Xerox copy of the statement of objection filed by Petitioner.

04-12-00

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) .

Forthe II Party/Management :-

Date

Description

Ex. No.

05-01-95

Xerox copy of the letter from the Petitioner.

01-07-94

Xerox copy of the standard form ofcharge sheet with Annexure .

07-01-95

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner for appointing Defence helper.

13-02-95

Xerox copy of the letter from EnquiryOfficerto Petitioner .

Officer and render the enquiry illegal would not vitiate the proceedings , the Enquiry Officer cannot himself assume the role of Presenting Officer and cannot cross examine and put leading questions to witnesses and therefore, his report is to be held as vitiated and opposed to principles of natural justice and he relied on the rulings reported in 1998 2 LLN 614 RADHAKRISHNA SETTY. Vs. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, MADRAS AND ANOTHER and 1994 II LLN 9 MANAGING DIRECTOR, ELECTRONIC CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD . Vs. B. KARUNAKAR. In the first decision, though it is stated that the Enquiry Officer should not be assumed the roll of Presenting Officer as I have already stated that inthis case, the Enquiry Officer has not cross examined the Petitioner nor put any leading questions to the witnesses . Further, in the 2nd decision relied on by the counsel for the Petitioner that the delinquent employee is entitled to copy of the enquiry report before the Disciplinary Authority takes a decision regarding guilt of the employee, in this case, since the Petitioner has admitted that he has received the enquiry report in his evidence before this Tribunal, 1 find there is no point in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that delinquent employee has not received the enquiry report and no sufficient opportunity was given to him. Therefore , from the evidence adduced before this Tribunal and also the records produced before this Tribunal, I find the action of the management of Southern Railway in imposing the punishment of penalty of removal from services on the Petitioner is legal and justified . Further, the continuous absence of the Petitioner is a chronic one and I cannot hold that is pardonable misconduct . Under such circumstances , I find this point against the Petitioner.

22-04-95

Xerox, copy of the enquiry proceedings,

Point No. 2 : -

Nil

Xerox copy of the enquiry report.

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled?

19-10-94

Xerox copy of the order of Respondent appointing Enquiry Officer.

17-10-95

17. In view of my foregoing findings that the action ofthe Respondent/Management in imposing the penalty ofremoval from service on the Petitioner is just and legal, I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief. No Costs .

Xerox copy of the letter of Disciplinary Authority Calling for representation from Petitioner 18. The reference is answered accordingly.

04-12-95

Xerox copy ofthe 2nd letter calling for representation from Petitioner.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 6th October, 2004. )

29-02-96

M10

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Xerox copy of the third letter of Respondent calling for submission fromPetitioner.

Witnesses Examined :-

: WWI Sri P. Rajendran

Nil

M11

For the I Party/Workman

Xerox copy of the acknowledge- ment card.

For the II Party /Management :

MWI Sri Joseph

Jesudoss Dennis

17-05-96

M12

Xerox copy of the penalty advice issued to Petitioner.

Documents Marked:-

9552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर , 2004

का.आ. 3166.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 121/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/33/2002- आई.आर. (बी-1 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 24th November, 2004

S.O. 3166. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 121 / 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman. which was received by the Central Government on 23-11-04.

[No. L- 12012/33/2002- IR(B-1 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN . Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

The worker's claim in brief is that he has been working as daily wage employee from the year 1979-80 in different branches of State Bank of India and his services wereterminated illegally since 28-10-94. The worker has been requesting orally for re -engagement but the officers ofthe State Bank of India on one pretext or other have been avoiding. Ultimately the worker vide his letter dated 14-6-99 asked the Bank to take him back in the service . The management of Bank vide its letter No. 615 dated 19/21-6-99 , desired the details ofwork in different branches to enable them to take suitable action . The workman furnished details vide his letter dated 13-9-99 . Thereafter, the Bank management vide letter No. 1294 dated 25-9-99 informedthe worker that since the conciliation proceedings are pending before ALC ( C) , Kanpur therefore, they are not able to decide on the issue . Aggrieved from the communication the management of the Bank, the worker filed an industrial dispute for conciliation on 29-11-99. The Bank management requested during the pendency at conciliation that worker's dispute be rejected also they denied to conciliate in the proceedings . The worker has also alleged that the State Bank of India prepared a list of dailywagers for interview in which he was called but the Bank management never declared the result . Under the said scheme the Bank management gave preference to the near and dear one of its officers . As the worker demanded for regularisation in service, he was terminated. The worker has therefore prayed that he should be reinstated with all back wages and cost.

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT:

SHRIKANT SHUKLA . Presiding Officer

LD . NO, 121/2002

Ref. No. L- 12012/33/2002- IR (B- 1 ) dated 10-7-2002

BETWEEN:

Krishan Chander Shukla, S/o Sh . Rajnarayan Shukla , 263- 264. E.W.S. Barra , Division -5 , Kanpur Nagar .

AND

The ChiefManager ( Karmik & M.S.N. ) Bhartiya State Bank . Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Kanpur (U.P. ) -208001 .

AWARD

The Government of India . Ministry of Labour vide their order No.: L- 12012/ 33/2002 - IR (B - I) dated 10-7-2002 has referred the following dispute to the Presiding Officer , Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court . Lucknow for adjudication.

"क्या मुख्य प्रबन्धक ( कार्मिक एवं म.स.वि. ) , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक, कानपुर द्वारा कार्मकार श्री कृष्ण चन्द्र शुक्ला आत्मज श्री राम नारायण शुक्ला को दिनांक28-10-94 से सेवा से निष्कासित करना न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं तो संबंधित कर्मकार किस असंतोष का हकदार है ? "

TheBank management has filed the written statement has denied the claim of the worker . The management alleged that the dispute raised by the worker is not industrial dispute within the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. No industrial dispute exists nor is apprehended and there is no cause of action in favour of alleged worker as such, the reference itself is bad in eyes of law and is not maintainable and devoid of any merits . It has also been alleged that this case is also not covered under the definition of' retrenchment ' within the provisions of said Act , hence provisions of Section 25F of the Act are not applicable in the present case . The management of Bank has stated that the worker has worked for 74 days in the year 1979 on day- to-day basis as Temporary Employee in Canal Road branch of the Bank . There was no other temporary employee in the said branch at the material time. Hence, the concept of seniority and juniority is not applicable in the present case . It is once more submitted that this case is not covered under the definition of `retrenchment ' hence he is not entitled to the post retrenchment benefits mentioned in Section 25F, 25G and 25H of the said Act . Likewise , worker also worked for 85 days in the year 1986 in Meston Road branch of the Bank , onday -to-daybasis temporarily to meet the temporary need ofthe branch, and thereafter his services were not required. It is stated by the opposite party that under the provisions ofsettlement November, 1987 it was decided to invite the 9553

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

and latches are irrelevant . The worker has also alleged that besides the work done by the worker in the different branches oftheBank as stated by the Bank management in its written statement, he has also worked in the other branches of the Bank . The worker has denied other allegations of the Bank management.

On the perusal of the statement of claim and the rejoinder it was found that worker has not specifically stated the date of commencement of service and last day ofworking with the Bank management in various branches. Worker has to specifically aver in his petition the name of the appointing authority who appointed him or engaged him for work. After hearing the worker it was ordered that the worker should furnish following facts:

1. The date of commencement of services and the last working day of engagement in different branches of the employer.

2. The name of the appointing authority who employed the workman

On 21-4-2003 the worker filed another application A1-19 , in which the worker has stated that he worked from 4-6-1979 to 16-8-1979 for 74 days in State Bank of India, Canal Road branch, Kanpur , from September , 1986 to December, 1986 for 85 days in Meston Road branch, Kanpur, from 1-7-1994 to 30-7-1994 for 26 days in Meston Road branch, Kanpur, from 1-10-1994 to 27-10-1994 for 21 days in Meston Road branch, Kanpur . He also mentioned the names ofbranch managers who have appointed him in different branches .

TheBank management has filed additional written statement and has reiterated that worker worked as casual labour only and therefore , he has no right to the post . It is also alleged that worker has never been in continuous service ofthe Bank for 240 days daring a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made as per Section 25B read with Section 25F as such alleged worker is not entitled for any relief.

The worker has filed following Photostat copy of documents.

1. Certificate of engagement for the following period:

(i ) 4-6-1979 to 30-6-79 = 27 days

(ii) 1-7-79to31-7-79 31 days

( i) 1-8-79 to 16-8-79

74days

Total 16days

2. Certificate of employment for the following period:

23 days

(i) September 1986

31days applications from the ex- temporary employees for considering him for the purpose ofgiving an occasion for regular appointment in Bank. After interview the wait list of the selected employees was prepared to give them chance in the future vacancies to be arisen till 1992. In two subsequent settlements of 1988 and 1991 the life of the panel as extended till 1996. In an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer, Hyderabad (AP ) and Majority Employees Union the said period as extended for the future vacancies arising up to 31-3-97 . Under the provisions of the said settlements the claimant was also given chance of interview, while number of ex -employees were fround suitable the claimant was not found suitable by the interview committee. The results of interview were declared time to time. The worker was also made aware of the result . Not only this much all the unsuitable candidates along with the worker were sent information by post . The worker has made false allegation that he was not made aware of the said result. It is also worth - mentioning that in the year 1994 he was again engaged as temporary employee for temporary need for the branch on day to day basis at the rateofRs. 20/- per day, in January, 1994, he was given work for 24 days, in July, 94 for 26 days, in September for 25 days and in October, 1992 for 21 days . He was paid wages Rs . 480 , 520, 500 and 420 accordingly. In all three said terms he has been a casual employee. He has never been engaged for 240 days to claim protection of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Under the provisions of para 16.9 of the Desai Award casual employees have been kept excluded from the benefits of the said Award . In the Bank there is a regular procedure of the appointment of all Award Staff. The entire procedure takes place at the Zonal Office . The branch manager has no role in the said appointment procedure . The temporary and casual employees have no right to the post . Such casual employees cannot claim regularisation in service. As per policy ofBank temporary engagement and or appointment does not give an employee a right for a permanent and or regular appointment . Regular appointment dare made only through process of appointment . There is no provision to regularise a temporary/casual employee . The worker desires back door entry for the appointment in Bank, which is not tenable in law. The worker has tried to make allegation ofunfair labour practice against the Bank only to give colour to the case. The worker was well aware of the above facts that are why he did not arise the industrial dispute at the material time and the alleged claim suffers from delay and latches. In the light of above facts the instant case deserves to be dismissed, and it is fit for a negative award. It is again pointed out that the worker has never been in continuous service ofthe management of the Bank for 240 days during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made as per Section 25 B read with Section 25F ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

(ii) October 1986

= 30days

(iii) November 1986

The worker has filed the rejoinder and has stated that there exist industrial dispute. It is also stated that delay 9554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

(iv) December 1986 1day Total

= 85 days 3. Application of K.C. Shukla, addressed to branch manager, Meston Road, Kanpur, requesting for 24 days wages from 3-12-93 to 31-12-93 .

4. Another application of the worker requesting for payment of wages for 26 days from 1-7-94 to 30-7-94.

5. Letter of the worker addressed to branch manager for payment of wages from 1-10-94 to 27-10-94 amountingto Rs .420.

The bank management has filed Photostate copy of following documents:

1. Settlement dated 17-11-1987 between State Bank of India and All India State Bank of India Staff Federation.

2. Advertisement of State Bank of India .

3. The settlement of year 1988 along with notice published in the new paper.

4. Settlement of 9-1-91 between the State Bank of India and All India State Bank of India Staff Federation.

5. The original letter of Chief Manager, State Bank of India addressed to K.C. Shukla dated 4-9-2003 regarding non - suitability of K.C. Shukla.

The worker has been delaying the disposal of the case and moved applications for adjournment at the stage ofevidence at various occassions . Ultimately he moved an application that the Presiding Officer may transfer the case to CGIT - cum-Labour Court , Kanpur which was rejected after hearing the worker.

The worker was examined on 15-6-2004 and the Bank also examined its witness , Mayya Din Gupta , Manager , Meston Road branch who have not been cross - examined bytheworker.

Onthe date fixed for argument the opposite party filedwritten argument the copy was made available to the workman. On 12-7-2004 , the worker again moved an application , alleging therein that his application for transfer of case is pending with the Government of India , Ministry of Labour and therefore the proceedings should be stayed.

The CGIT- cum-Labour Court found the reason as not satisfactory and on 17-9-2004 it rejected the application and fixed 18-10-2004 for argument. On 18-10-2004 also, the worker moved an application , C- 37 this time on the basis of sickness of his representative . No affidavit was accompanied by said application nor any medical certificate

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] was produced regarding sickness of his representative . The application was also opposed by the representative of the Bank. The representative of the opposite party stated that worker is avoiding the disposal of case therefore his application for adjournment was rejected.

Even now at this date no communication has been received from the Government that the case is transferred to CGIT-cum - Labour Court, Kanpur, Therefore it is desirable to pass award on the basis of pleadings i.e. statement ofclaim, the written statment , rejoinder and the evidence of the parties.

The order of reference is received in this Court along with the applications of the workman , which was produced before ALC ( C) , Kanpur. The worker moved the application before ALC ( C) , Kanpur on 29-11-99 alleging therein that he has beenworking as water boy since 1979 and has also worked in different branches ofthe Bank and ultimately he wasterminated on 28-10-94 without assigning any reason. In this application also there is no mention that why he filed the application so late . There is lapse of more than 5 years. There is no details in the said application apart his period ofworking in different branches of State Bank of India. Therefore, the Bank management sought for the details.Before the proceedings in the office of ALC( C) , Kanpur there is an application dated 13-9-99 in file purported to be written by the worker to the ChiefManager informing him that he worked for 74 days in 1988 in State Bank of India, Canal Road branch and has also worked for 85 days in 1996 in Meston Road branch, Kanpur and has also mentioned that he has worked for 90 days in 93-94 in Meston Road branch , Kanpur. In the said application the worker has not mentioned that he has been continuously working from year 88 to94.

Theworker , K. C. Shukla has been examined on oath by this Court. The worker has alleged that he worked as under:

1. He worked for 74 days in 1979 in Canal Road branch as temporary water boy.

2. He has also worked for 85 days in 1986 in Mesion Road branch .

3. He worked for 85 days in the year 1996 and thereafter he amended his statement and said that he worked for 90 days , but he has failed to produce any certificate.

In further examination he has stated that he has not worked at Meston Road branch . Thereafter, he again amended his statement and stated that he did not work in the year 1996 but stated that he worked from 1st July 94 to 30th July 94. Thereafter, he again amended his statement and stated that he worked from 1-10-94 to 27-10-94 . Further. he has stated that from 30-12-93 to 31-12-93 he has been all 9555 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

continuously employed as he has tried to allege in the statement ofclaim.

along a labour. He has also stated that he has not given any application that he may be taken on employment .

Inthe cross -examination he has admitted that in the year 79 he was aged about 16 years only and he attained 18 years of age in year 1981 .

The notice published on the basis of settlement dated 17-11-87, the selection process was disclosed and it was clearly mentioned that the temporary employees shall be interviewed and they will be empanelled in waiting list which shall be valid up to 1992. The second settlement between State Bank of India and All India State Bank of India Staff Federation reached on 27-10-88 . In which the waiting list was extended up to year 1996 vacancies and 3rd settlement reached on 9-1-91 which provided the panel ofdaily wager will remain operative up to vacancies arising up to 1996 . TheBank management has proved that the worker, K. С. Shuklawas not found suitable by the selection committee. Inthe circumstances only because the worker has moved anapplication for appointment as a regular employee and simply because he was interviewed is not sufficient to give him offer ofappointment as regular employee.

The settlement dated 17-11-87 between State Bank of India and All India State Bank of India Staff Federation is quite relevant so far as the appointment of casual labour/ temporary employee's regular appointment is concerned. It is laid down in the said settlement that the temporary employee would have been in the Bank's temporary service anytime during 1-7-1975 to 31-12-1987 or any other date determined by the Bank and within 18 to 26 years of age on the dateof initial temporary appointment, besides fulfilling the other prescribed eligibility criteria for appointment in the subordinate cadre subject to clauses 4( a) and (b) Infra, which reproduced below:

Asalready discussed above it is noted that in the settlement dated 17-11-87 , between State Bank of India and All India State Bank of India Staff Federation only those workers were entitled to apply who have worked during 1975 to 1987 within the age group of 18 to 26 years ofage on the date of initial temporary employment . The worker knew it well that his working as casual labour i.e. water boy in the year 1979 is of no help to him as he was below 18 years of age therefore in the letter dated 13-9-99 he has written that he has worked for 74 days in the year 1988. It is worthwhile to mention here that worker has not worked at all in year 88. it is also necessary to point out that the worker has tried to allege in application dated 13-9-99 that he worked for 85 days in 1996 which is also false. As is evidence from his statement .

"4(a) The temporary employees , who after termination of their initial appointments acquired a higher qualification in the High School Final examination SSC or Matriculation or other equivalent examination in 2nd or 3rd division and are not eligible for being considered for clerical appointment and have not used the said higher qualification to secure employment elsewhere and eitherworking as such or ceased to work, willbe givena chance for permanent appointment along withother candidates , as a special cases , and this will not be treated as a precedent. It is clearly understood by the Federation that in future for purpose ofany type of recruitment/appointment either ontemporary or permanent capacity in the subordinate cadre, only those candidates willbe considered who fulfil the eligibility criteria (educational qualification viz . less than matriculation) both at the time of initial temporary appointment or permanent absorption.

It ispertinent to mention here that the worker did work after attaining the age of 18 years from September, 1986to December, 1986 for 85 days only. Therefore , when the settlement of 1987 came into existence he had put in only 85 days of working. The recital of settlement 1987 para3 is reproduced below:

(b) Pending disputes/cases initiated by temporary employees or unions/associations shall be withdrawn by them as a result of this settlement . "

"3. It is, however, understood that vacancies will firstbe filled from unused panels of the temporary employees , (having 90 days temporary service as on31-10-1984) already interviewed and waitlisted and thereafter remaining vacancies , if any, will be thrown open for the above category of temporary employees."

Facts about the alleged application for appointment interviewed has no relevancies in the disposal ofpresent reference.

The age is very material . In this particular case , the worker was 16 years of age at his initial appointment from 4-6-1979 to 16-8-79 totalling 74 working days . The worker was well aware ofthe fact that he was of 16 years of age in the year 1979 and therefore he was not suitable for the post. From the worker's own document he worked for 85 days in the year 1986 so there is a gap of 7 years in between his re-employment.

Inthe present case issue referred to this Court is only to the extent as to whether the termination of K. C. Shukla on 20-8-94 is legal and proper or not ? The worker has to prove that he is entitled to remain in service . The It is also admitted that the worker did worked from 3-12-93 to31-12-93 for 24 days, from 1-7-94 to 30-7-94 for 26 days and 1-10-94 to 27-10-94 for 21 days . It shows that the worker has worked in different spells and was not 9556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

than 5 years and there is no satisfactory explanation is officered for delay then the Labour Court has jurisdiction todecline relief.

The management has also argued that it is only when the worker has put in 240 days of service with the management then only any termination shall be illegal ifhe is not given due notice/compensation. It has been argued that the worker has not worked for even 100 days before hisdisengagement on 28-10-94.

various settlement between the bank management andAll India State Bank of India Staff Federation are of no help to the worker . From the evidence on record it is proved that the worker has worked for 74 days in year 1979, 85 days in year 1986 and 96 days salary has been paid to him for January, 94 , July, 94, September, 94, October, 94. From the entire evidence on record it is proved that the worker was not in continuous service right from the year 1979 to October, 94 as he has tried to alleged in his statement of claim. It is false to say that worker has worked from 1979 to October, 94, continuously.

On the discussions above I come to the conclusion that disengagement of the worker on 28-10-94 does not sufferto illegality and it is not improper as well . The issue referred therefore it answered in affirmative against the worker. The worker therefore , is not entitled to any relief whatsoever.

Lucknow 11-11-2004

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3167.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 102/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/ 173/2002- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th November, 2004

S.O. 3167. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 102/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Stae Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-11-2004.

[No. L- 12012/ 173/2002-IR(B - I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE

At the time of initial appointment in the year 1979 he was minor and he put in 74 days working days . Thereafter a lapse of several years the worker sought engagement for 85 days in year 1986. Then again from December, 93 , he got ajob for 24 days. He was not engaged in February, 94 to June, 94. However, he was engaged in July, 94 for 26 days, September, 94 for 25 days and October, 94 for 21 days . The above shows that worker did not complain when he was disengaged after working for 74 days in year 1979, he remained silent . He was not competent to contract service, as he was minor . Ordinarily for engaging as casual labour one need not go to verify the age , the parentage , the residence etc. of the worker . In the year 1986 , he was engaged for 85 days only, worker even the remained silent and after a gape of nearly more than 5 years he was again engaged for 96 days . This clearly shows that he was temporarily engaged for the need of branches where he was engaged . It also established that when the need was over he was disengaged . Such brief spells of engagement of various branches of bank do not create any right to the worker to the post to which he was engaged . It is also noteworthy to mention that for the sub -staff in the Bank the appointing authority is not the branch manager . The Bank has regular procedure of appointment of sub - staff. The entire procedure takes place at Zonal Office and branch manager has no role in the said appointment procedure . The worker has stated in his application dated 21-4-2003 that he was appointed by the branch manager only and since the branch manager is not the appointing authority therefore , there is no relationship of the worker with the management of the opposite party. The worker cannot claim to be appointed as regularly appointed persons as he was not appointed following the due procedures of law or selection as has been held in case law, 2000 LAB IC 1969 (Delhi High Court) Ajay Kumar and others v. Govt. ofNCT ofDelhi and others.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 8th September , 2004

PRESENT :

The worker has to prove that he worked for 240 days prior to his disengagement on 28-10-94 and the worker has filedto prove so.

K. JAYARAMAN , PresidingOfficer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 102/2002 The management has heavily relied upon the case law 1996 LAB.IC. 45 (Punjab and Haryana High Court ) (At Chandigarh) , Balwant Singh v. Labour Court , Bhatinda and others and has argued that the order of termination challenged after lapse of five years after a lapse of more

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of Sub -section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between theManagement of State Bank India and their workman).

9557 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

BETWEEN:

: I Party/Petitioner

Sri M. Rajasekaran

AND

II Party /Management

The ChiefGeneral Manager, State Bank of India, LocalHeadOffice, Chennai .

APPEARANCE :

For the Workman

: M/ s. Aiyar & Dolia, R.Arumugugam & N. Krishnakumar , Advocates

For the Management

: Mr. K.S. Sundar , B.

Mahi Bala Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L- 12012/ 173/ 2002 -IR(B -I) dated 25-10-2002 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication :-

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri M. Rajasekaran w.e.f. 24-03-1995 for his long unauthorised absence is justified ? If not , what relief he is entitled ?"

enclosing the fitness certificate made several representations to the Respondent authorities and the bank has sent a letter on 19-7-2000 stating that there is no provision in the Bipartite Settlement for his reinstatement once the relationship of master and servant has been ceased. The reason given by the Respondent/Bank is not correct. The Petitioner was not able to attend the office solely on the reason that he was on continuous treatment for psychiatric illness . There is no provision in Bipartite Settlement or Sastry Award that the bank can voluntarily retire anemployee from service that too without proceeding against the employee by way of issuing a chargesheet . The bank without issuing any proper notice terminated his services as if he deemed to have voluntarily retired w.e.f. 24-3-95 . Even in the 7th Bipartite Settlement under clause 33 , the bank specially agreed that voluntary cessation of employment shall stand deleted and therefore, the order passed by the Respondent/Bank is illegal . Even after the Deputy General Manager's recommendation , the bank has not considered the case of the Petitioner on humanitarian grounds . The Petitioner has not committed any major misconduct . He did not attend the bank only due to his illness . The principles of natural justice has not been followed in this case and therefore, the order passed by the authorities is illegal and unsustainable and also in contravention of provisions of kndustrial Disputes Act . No notice was given to the Petitioner nor any compensation was paid under section 25F of the Act and therefore, the Petitioner prays that he may be reinstated in service with continuity of service and also back wages and other attendant benefits .

2. After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 102/2002 and notices were issued toboth the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations in the Claim Statement filed by the Petitioner are briefly as follows:-

4. As against this, the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that the Petitioner's dispute is not one involving termination ofhim , as the Petitioner absented himself and abandoned to join duty and abandoned his employment and hence , he is not entitled to any rellefas prayed for. Since the Petitioner deemed to have vacated his service on 24-3-95 , this dispute is barred by unexplained and inordinate delay in raising the dispute and hence liable tobe rejected. It is true that the Petitioner absented himself from duty from 22-10-1994 but the allegation that he was periodically representing to branch authorities to grant leave on loss of pay by producing medical certificate for the treatment is not true . The Petitioner was continuously absenting himself from duty w.e.f. 22-10-94 and he did not apply for leave and his absence was treated as unauthorised absence as per rules governing his service. Even for the notice dated 9-11-94 and letter dated 21-2-95 he has not sent any reply and therefore, he was informed that if he failed to report for duty within the stipulated period, then he would be deemed to have voluntarily retired from service on the expiry of thirty days . Lastly , the bank sent a letter on 24-3-1995 by registered post in terms of Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-1995 stating that since the Petitioner failed to report for duty from 24-3-1995, the The Petitioner was appointed as a messenger at the overseas branch of the Respondent/Bank on 20-6-86 . Subsequently, he was promoted as a daftry w.e.f. 15-10-93 . At the end of 1994, his wife fell sick quite often and his father was away at Chidambarm and since no other elder person was in the family, the entire responsibility fell on the Petitioner. Thus he has faced so many problems in the house and in spite of these domestic problems the Petitioner attended the bank works and due to continuous work in the bank and in the house without any break and without any rest, he experienced severe tension and agony and he became mentally depressed and he was in continuous treatment for more than two years . Due to this and continued medical treatment and care by Dr. L. Ravishankar, Psychiatric Consultant, he was not able to attend the bank due to continuous illness and this was duly informed to the bank. When he was fully cured in the year 1998, he reported for duty. To his utter dismay and shock, he was informed by the branch that his name has beenstruck off from the rolls . Subsequently, the Petitioner

3530 GI/2004-35 9558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Petitioner is deemed to have voluntarily retired from service w.e.f. 24-3-95 . As per provisions of Sastry Award and Bipartite Settlement clause 17 of Bipartite Settlement 1989, action taken by the Respondent against the Petitioner is valid in law. In terms of the above provisions, since the Petitioner failed and neglected to report for duty, he was treated as voluntarily retired from service and thereby forfeiting his employment. Therefore, this dispute is not maintainable before this Tribunal . The Petitioner has never applied for any leave and his absence was unauthorised and therefore, the action of the Respondent/Management thatthe Petitioner was deemed to have voluntarily vacated from service is valid and therefore , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.

5. In these circumstances , the point for my determination is-

Respondent/Bank has agreed to delete the clause XVII of 5th Bipartite Settlement namely Voluntary Cessation of Employment . Under such circumstances , the Respondent/Management cannot pass an order on the ground that due to his continuous absence, he was deemed to have voluntarily retired from service and there is no provision in the Bipartite Settlement or Sastry Award that the bank can voluntarily retire an employee from service that too without proceeding against the employee by way of issuing a charge sheet or disciplinary procedure or domestic enquiry or any formalities. In this case, the Petitioner has not subjected to any disciplinary proceedings as laid down by the Bipartite Settlement in vogue . There is no notice of termination of Petitioner's service and notice, which was issued to Petitioner as if he deemed to have voluntarily retired w.e.f. 25-3-1994 , is not valid in law and no opportunity was given to the Petitioner and without hearing the Petitioner, the action was initiated against him.

( i ) "Whether the action of the Respondent/Bank in terminating the services of the Petitioner w.e.f. 24-3-95 isjustified?"

(ii) "To what relief the Petitioner is entitled?"

Point No. 1 :-

6. In this case, it is admitted by both sides that the Petitioner had absented for duty from 22-10-1994 and he has not given any leave application for his absence and therefore , his absence was unauthorised. The Petitioner alleged that during the period of his absence , he was affected with mental depression and he was under continuous medical treatment under one Doctor L. Ravishankar , Psychiatric Consultant and he was not able to attend the bank due to the continuous illness and this was also duly informed to the bank . But , there is no document to prove that the Petitioner was mentally depressed and he was under continuous treatment under Dr. L. Ravishankar. Further, there is not even a single document to prove that he has informed his illness to the Respondent/Bank. Further, even after the letter and notice given by the bank authorities as per Bipartite Settlement , the Petitioner has not replied to the said letter and notice and he has not reported for duty, even after the said notice and letter. It is not the case of the Petitioner that the said letter and notice were not received by him only after a long lapse of time nearly three years , he appeared before the Respondent authorities and has given a letter stating that he was under medical treatment under one Dr. L. Ravishankar, psychiatric consultant and only due to his illness, he has not attended the duty. But even prior to this date namely letter dated 6-3-98 , the Respondent has terminated the services of the Petitioner as he was deemed to have abandoned his duty.

7. The learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that the Respondent/Management has not followed any procedure as laid down under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and even in the 7th Bipartite Settlement , the

8. But, as against this the learned counsel for the Repondent has argued that even though it is alleged that in the 7th Bipartite Settlement it was agreed to delete the clause XVII of the 5th Bipartite Settlement namely voluntary cessation of service, even in that settlement , it is clearly mentioned that only in cases arising subsequent to theBipartite Settlement i.e. after 27-3-2000 the said change has been effected . Evett in that clause , in cases ofpending initiated prior to this agreement, the proceedings shall continue in terms of the old provisions. Under the old provisions Clause XVII clearly stated that in such cases, 'where an employee has not submitted any applicaiton for leave and absents himself from work for a period of 90 or more consecutive days without or beyond any leave to his credit or absents himself for 90 or more consecutive days beyond the period of leave originally sanctioned or subsequently extended or where there is satisfactory evidence that he has taken up employment in India or the management is satisfied that he has no present intention of joining duties , the management may at any time , thereafter, give a notice to the employee's last known address calling upon him to report for duty within 30 days ofthe notice stating inter - alia the grounds for management coming to the conclusion that the employee has no intention of joining duties and furnishing necessary evidence where available . Unless the employee reports for dutywithin 30 days or unless he gives an explanation for his absence satisfying the management that he has not taken up another employment or avocation and that he has no intention of not joining duties , the employee willbe deemedto have voluntarily retired from the bank's service on the expiry of the said notice ' and in this case since the Petitioner has absented for duty from 22-10-1994 and he has not given any valid explanation for his absence , the action taken by the Respondent/Management is valid in aw. As the Petitioner in this case failed and neglected to report for duty he was treated as voluntarily retired from --9559 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

by the Respondent/Bank under Ex. Ml and M2 the Petitioner has not given any valid reason. Under such circumstances, as per the judgment of the Supreme Court, the action taken by the Respondent/Management is valid in law and it cannot be questióned before this Tribunal . As stated by the Supreme Court, it is not a punishment for misconduct but only to notice the realities of situation resulting from long absence of the Petitioner from work with no satisfactory explanation thereto and therefore, this claim is not maintainable before this Tribunal .

9. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent because, the Petitioner has not given any valid explanation for not sending any reply to the notice issued by the Respondent. Further , he has not reported for duty immediately after the notice issued byRespondent/Management. Under such circumstances , the reasons given by the Petitioner in the Claim Statement was made only for the purpose of this case and therefore , I find this point against the Petitioner.

Point No. 2:-

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled?

10. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief as prayed for. No Costs.

11. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 8th September, 2004.)

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined

None

On either side

Documents Marked:-

For the I Party/Workman:- Nil

For the Party/Management:-

Ex. No. Date

Description

09-11-94 MI

Xerox copy of the notice sent by Respondent/Bank to Petitioner by RPAD

M2 21-02-95 Xerox copy of the notice sentby Respondent/Bank to Petitioner by RPAD

M3 25-02-95

Xerox copy of the postal acknowledgement for RPAD

M4 24-03-95 Xerox copy of the voluntary retirement order issued by Respondent/Management to Petitioner

M5 06-03-98

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Respondent/Bank.

service and thereby forfeiting his employment . Even the Supreme Court in 2001 (1 ) SCC 214 PUNJAB & SIND BANK AND OTHERS VS. SAKATTAR SINGH has held that "under clause 16 ofIV Bipartite Settlement the employee isgiven an opportunity to rejoin duty within a stipulated time or explain his position to the satisfaction of the management that he has no intention ofnot joining duty anda presumption will be drawn that the employee does not require thejob anymore and will stand retired from service. Thus, there is no punishment for misconduct but onlyto notice the realities ofthe situation resulting from longabsence ofan employee from work with no satisfactory explanation thereto. Principles ofnaturaljustice cannot be examined in vacuum without reference to the fact situation arising in the case. This rule has been incorporated in an agreement where representatives of employees ' unions were party. They also realised the futility ofcontinuing with a situation when an employee without appropriate intimation to the management is playing truant. " The learned counsel for the Respondent further relied on AIR 2000 SCC 2198, wherein the Supreme Court has held in such a situation that "a notice was sent on correct address of the delinquent and was received back with the postal endorsement ' refused' . A clear presumption arose in favour of the bank and against the delinquent. Yet, the Tribunal held that no notice was given to him as postman was not produced by the bank. This would be rather an incongrous finding by the Tribunal. Bank has followed the requirements of clause 16 of Bipartite Settlement and it rightly held that delinquent has voluntarily retired from the service ofthe bank. Under these circumstances, it was.not.necessary for the bank to hold any enquiry before passing the order. An enquiry would have been necessary, if delinquent had submitted his explanation which was not acceptable to the bank or contended that he did not report for duty, but was not allowed to join by the bank. In this case, no explanation was offered by the employee for his absence from duty and did not report for duty within 30 days as required under clause 16 of Bipartite Settlement. Thus , undue reliance on the principles ofnatural justice by the Tribunal and even by the High Court has certainly ledto miscarriage ofjustice asfar as bank was concerned. There was no occassion for the Tribunal to direct that delinquent be reinstated in service or for the High Court not tohave exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to set aside the Award. " Relying on these rulings, the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that in this case the Petitioner has not given any valid explanation for his long absence from duty. Further, though he has contended that he has informed the bank about his illness, he has not produced any document to show that he has informed the same to the Respondent/Bank. Under such circumstances, the reason given by the Petitioner in the Claim Statement was only made for the purpose of this case. Under such circumstances , even to the notice issued 9560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II SEC. 3 (ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2004

Jaipur.

.....Non-Applicant

PRESENT:

Presiding Officer:

Sh . R.C. Sharma

Fortheapplicant:

Sh. M.F. Baig.

Forthe non-applicants : Sh .Alok Fahetpuria

Date of award:

04-11-2004 का. आ. 3168.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दी बैंक ऑफ राजस्थान लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी.-2/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

AWARD

[सं. एल.-12012/469/2001- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 24th November, 2004

The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause ' D ' of sub- Sections 1 & 2 (A) to Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( herein after referred to as the ' Act ' ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under:-

"Whether the action of the management of The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. , Jaipur in terminting the services ofworkman Shri Mohd. Mehmood Alam S/o Shri Mohd. Farid w.e.f. 16-9-2000 is justified ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled?"

S.O. 3168.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-11-2004 .

[No. L- 12012/469/2001 - IR (B - I)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT JAIPUR

Case No. CGIT - 2/2002 Reference No. L- 12012/469/2001 -IR (B- I) ]

2. The workman in his statement ofclaim has pleaded thathe was initially employed as 4th Class -cum- Farash in the month of February, 1998 in the branch of the non- applicant bank situated at opposite SMS Hospital, Jaipur, who continuously worked up to 15-9-2000 . At his instance, a legal notice was issued to the non- applicant bank wherein the demand for providing him salary equivalent to that ofa regular employee was raised and on receipt of this notice by the non- applicants , his service was terminated w.e.f. 16-9-2000. He has further averred that he had completed 240 days of continuous service in each calendar year. But prior to the termination of his service , neither one month's notice nor pay in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation was paid to him. He has prayed that his termination order be declared illegal and he be reinstated in the service with its continuity and back-wages.

Sh .Mohd. Mehmood Alam , S/o Sh . Mohd. Farid, Through Sh . M.F. Baig , Thakkur Boraj Ka Rasta , Ajmeri Gate, Jaipur (Raj.)-302001

Applicant

VERSUS

1. Chief Manager, TheBank ofRajasthan Ltd. Regional Officer, C-49 , Bhagwandas Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302001.

2. Branch Manager, The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. Opp . SMS Hospital,

3. The non- applicants , in their written counter, have disputed the claim and have stated that the workman was not appointed through the procedure prescribed for the appointment ofthe regular employees, that he was engaged as a Sweeper for sweeping and cleaning the bank premises on hourly basis on the payment of consolidated wages of Rs . 900/- per month, but he willfully abstained from attending the office. They have further averred that during the conciliation proceedings before the Assistant Labour Commissioner on 8-3-2001 , the bank has filed a written statement that if the workman is willing to attend the office ofthe bank , then the bank is ready to take him back on the duty on payment of a consolidated amount of Rs . 900/- per month as paid to him earlier. They have also added 9561 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

completed 240 days of actual work with the bank and he is entitled for his reinstatement .

that the workman was a part -time employee w.e.f. October 1999 to June 2000 only under the employment of the bank, but had not completed 240 days of service during the calendaryear.

4. In the rejoinder, the workman has reiterated the facts as stated by him in the statement of claim.

5. On the pleadings ofboth the parties, the following points for determination were framed:-

L Whether the non - applicant establishment had employed the workman on the post of 4th Class in February 1998, who completed over 240 days during his service period? BOA

10. Arguing contra, the ld. representative for the management contends that the workman had worked only from October 1999 to June 2000, who had not completed 240 days and had only completed about 220 days in the calendar year preceding to his termination . His next contention is that the workman was employed on hourly basis who only performed the work for only six hours a week . The Id. representative has further contended that the workman himself discontinued from the work and the bank had never declined him to attend the office . The bank had offered him the employment on the same conditions, but had not accepted them and did not turn up.Hence, as per the contention ofthe ld. representative for the bank, the intentions of the workman are very clear, whowas not willing to work with the management. Theld. representative has placed his reliance upon AIR 2001 SC 1005 in support of his contention .

II. Whether the non -applicants have terminated the service of workman w.e.f. 16-9-2000 in violation of the provisions of Section 25 -F ofthe ID Act , 1947 ? BOA

III. Relief, if any.

11. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions and have carefully gone through the judicial verdicts referred to before me.

6. In the evidence , the workman has submitted his affidavit, who was cross - examined on behalf of the bank. In the defence, the affidavits of MW- 1 , Sh. Ashok Sharma, Assistant General Manager and MW-2, Sh. RL Jain , Assistant General Manager have been brought on the record, who were cross -examined on behalf of the workman. Both the parties have also led the documentary evidence on the record.

7. I have heard both the parties and have scanned the record. The point - wise discussion follows as under:-

Point Nos . I & II

12. It is the case of the workman that he was employed by the bank who continuously worked w.e.f. February 1998 to 15th September, 2000 as a 4th Class -cum- Farash and when a notice was issued at his instance to thebank for providing him the remuneration admissible to that ofa regular employee, it annoyed the bank authorities and his service was terminated w.e.f. 16-9-2000. Contrary to it, the stand of the bank is that the workman was engaged as a part -time wager who performed his work on hourly basis and had discharged his duties from October 1999 to June 2000. The plea of the self- abandonment of the job by the workman has been adopted by the management .

8. Since the facts of both the points relate to the provision under Section 25- F of the Act, they are discussed together being identical in nature .

13. Both the parties have led the documentary evidence and the material documents are Ex. M - 1 to M- 9(A) which reflect over the controversy in question, which will find discussion hereinafter.

14. In his affidavit the workman has deposed that he worked from February 1998 to 15-9-2000 as a 4th Class- cum-Farash. In his cross -examination , he has admitted that no written appointment order was issued to him nor the written termination order was given to him . But he has admitted that he had withdrawn the wages for a period of nine months only after signing over the papers .

15. The oral evidence adduce on behalf of the management is that of MW- 1 , Sh . Ashok Sharma and MW- 2 , Sh. R.L. Jain , Ashok Sharma has deposed that from July 1995 up to June 2000 , he was posted as the BranchManager in the branch located opposite the SMS Hospital , Jaipur and the workman had worked from 9. The ld. representative for the workman contends that the workman had worked w.e.f. February 1998 to 15-9-2000 with the non - applicant bank, whose service was terminated on 16-9-2004 in violation of Section 25 -F ofthe Act. His contention is that when a notice was issued to the bank to provide the salary to the workman on the principle of equal work for equal pay, his service was terminated w.e.f. 16-9-2000 . The ld. representative further adds that on behalf of the bank, it is alleged that the job was abandoned by the workman himself, which is not proved from the record and he is willing to work with the non-applicant bank for which his continuity of service should be maintained by the bank. He has also submitted that the workman was full -time employee who has 9562

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART I SEC. 3 (ii) ]

ofJune , 2000 vide his application Ex. M- 9 and pay order Ex. M-9 (A) passed thereupon. Accordingly, the workman has been able to establish this fact that he workedup to 15-9-2000 and thereafter he was refused by the bank to attend the duty w.e.f. 16-9-2000 .

October 1999 to May 2000 during his tenure . He has proved the applications filed by the workman Ex. M - 1 to M-7. Similarly, MW- 2 , R. L. Jain has stated that he was posted as Chief Manager in the office of the C- Scheme Branch at Jaipur from 5-6-2000 to 3-5-2002 , who has exhibited the applications Ex . M - 8 and M - 9 respectively. Thus, apparently there is a dispute with regard to the spell of the employment discharged by the workman with the non- applicant bank.

18. The termination of the workman thus appears tobe affected from 16-9-2000 and when the period is calculated in the preceding calendar year since the date of his termination, it comes to over 240 days of actual service, which stands proved on the basis of the material and evidence available on the record.

19. It is not in dispute that prior to the termination ofthe service of the workman neither one month's notice nor pay in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation were given to the workman. Thus , the termination of the workman tantamounts to his retrenchment and he is entitled to get the protection under Section 25 -F of the Act.

16. Ex. M- 1 to M - 9 are the applications written by the workman respectively wherein he has requested to pay him the wages which he had submitted before the bank. In Ex . M- 1 , he has urged that the wages for the month of October, 1999 be given to him and for the payment of the wages of the subsequent months onwards to June , 2000 he had addressed these applications Ex . M- 2 to M-9 respectively to the Branch Manager . The pay orders were issued vide documents Ex . 1 (A) to M- 9 (A) thereupon by the bank respectively. These are the banker's cheque whereby the payment ofwages was made to the workman . Thus , it is evident that the workman was paid the remuneration for performing his work from October 1999 to June 2000 totalling nine months . As stated earlier, the workman has admitted in his cross - examination that he had withdrawn the wages pertaining to nine months after signing over the relevant documents . Similarly, MW- 1 Ashok Sharma in his cross examination has clearly stated that in the related period mentioned in Ex . M- 1 to M-7, the workman was continuously working with the bank . Hence, on the strength of the applications Ex. M - 1 to M - 9 and their payment orders from Ex. M- 1 (A) to M- 9 (A), it is evidently clear that the workman was continuously under the employment of the bank from October 1999 to June 2000 and this is the admitted position which emerges out from these documents .

20. That takes me to the determination of the question as to the entitlement of the back- wages to the workman. The Id. representative for the management contends that the bank had offered to the workman that it is ready to take him back on the duty on the same conditions on which he was working earlier, but he did not turnup. Per contra, the Id. representative for the workman submits that the bank never agreed to pay him the same wages which were drawn by the workman earlier nor the bank was willing to give him the continuity of the service. Hence, this offer could not be carried out. However, the Id. representative for the banks has urged that when the offer of the employment has been made to the workman , which was not accepted by him , then under such circumstances he is not entitled for the back - wages and the Id. representative has referred to AIR 2001 SC 1005 in support of his contention .

21. In the referred to decision, the question which arosebefore their Lordships for consideration was whether the workman were entitled for the back- wages from the receipt of the dates of their appointments for from any other subsequent date . It was held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that the calculation of the back- wages should be made from the date of the award . Obviously, the controversy involved in the case at hand was res integra in the decision supra and the Id. representative for the bankdoes not derive any help. from it .

22. The workman has pleaded that he is out of employment since the date of his termination. It could not be rebutted on behalf of the bank by adducing the trustworthy evidence. Hence, the workman is entitled for getting the back-wages.

17. MW - 1 , Ashok Sharma in his affidavit has deposed that during his tenure as the Branch Manager, theworkman continued only up to May, 2000 and thereafter he himself abstained from the month of June, 2000. Firstly, itis an admitted fact that the notice Ex . W- 1 was issued to the non -applicant bank which was received on behalf of the bank on 15-9-2000 and in the notice it has been specifically stated on behalf of the workman that w.e.f. Fcbruary, 1998 till the date of the notice the workman was continuously working with the bank. It leads to infer that ti.1 15-9-2000 , the workman was continuing under the employment of the bank and this fact could not be rebutted on behalf of the bank by adducing any cogent evidence . It is , therefore , established that the workman had discharged his duties till 15-9-2000 and his statement is fortified by the notice Ex. W- 1 Secondly, no reasonable cxplanation could be rendered on behalf of the bank that if the workman had abandoned the job in the months of May, 2000 then why he was paid the wages for the month

23. For the foregoing reasons , the workman has succeeded in establishing his plea that he had completed.

9563 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926.

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Reference No. L- 12012/ 179/1994 -IR (B -I )

Sh. Kailash Chandra Sharma,

over 240 days of actual service with the non - applicant bank in a calendar year preceding to the date of his termination, which amounts to retrenchment. Accordingly, both these points are decided in favour of the workman and against the bank.

.....Applicant

S/o Sh. Surya Narayan, R/o Bihari Ji Ka Mandir, Near Bada Rawla , Chandalai , Via Shivdaspura, Jaipur

VERSUS

TheGeneral Manager Bank ofRajasthan,

SardarPatel Marg ,

Non -Applicant

Jaipur.

24. Consequently, the reference is answered in affirmative in favour of the workman and against the non- applicants. The claim ofthe workman is allowed and it is held that his termination order dated 16-9-2000 is unjustified and illegal and he is entitled to be reinstated in the service with its continuity and along with 50 per cent back-wages . An award is passed in these terms accordingly.

PRESENT:

Sh. R.C. Sharma

Presiding Officer:

25. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17( 1 ) of theAct .

Sh. V.K. Joshi

Forthe applicant:

R. C. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

Sh.Alok Fatehpuria

For the non-applicants:

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2004

28-10-2004

Date ofaward:

AWARD

का. आ. 3169.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ राजस्थान लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.बी. आई.टी. - 23/2003) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause 'D ' of sub - Sections 1 to Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein after referred to as the ' Act' ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under:-

[सं. एल. - 12012/179/1994- आई.आर. (बी-1 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

"Whether the action ofthe management ofBank of Rajasthan Limited in terminating the services of Shri Kailash Chandra is justified ? If not, what relief the applicant concerned is entitled to ?"

New Delhi , the 24th November, 2004

S.O. 3169.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 23/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. and their workman, received by the Central Government-on 23-11-2004 .

[No. L- 12012/179/ 1994- IR (B- 1)]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT JAIPUR

2. Theworkman in his statement of claim has pleaded that he was employed by the now- applicant bank as a part-time Peon (farash) and on completton of 80 days of service, he was terminated illegally by the management. He unsuccessfully raised in industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer who submitted the failure report to theMinistry ofLabour and subsequently he came to know in the year 1995 that the Central Government has declined to refer his dispute to the Labour Court . He preferred a write petition against the order the Central Governinent dated 24-11-95 , wherein the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court issued a direction to the Central Government to refer the dispute to the Labour Court for adjudication. He has further pleaded that as per the bipartite settlement dated 3-4-81 , theapplications for appointment from those persons were invitedwho had worked temporarily for 80 dayssoror overo it earlier. Pursuant to it, the workman applied for the employment, who was called for the interview on 18-3-85 Case No. CGIT- 23/2003 9564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1926

and was selected and his name was placed at serial No. 59 of the panel . But he was not appointed in the service despite the fact that his juniors were appointed. He has prayed that he be reinstated into the service with its continuity and other consequential benefits .

3. The non - applicant, in his written counter, while admitting the facts that the workman was employed as a part-time4th class -cum- farash on hourly basis per week from 9-4-81 to 26-6-81 and that he had completed 80 days of work with the bank, has assailed the legality and maintainability of his inter alia that it is belated one, as it has been raised after the lapse of 12 years and the case of the workman falls within the ambit of Section 2(00) (bb) of the Act. He has further stated that the workman was not a full -time employee , that his employment came to an automatic end on account of non - renewal of stipulated period and that he was never recruited as per the prescribed procedure of the bank. It has been further pointed out that at the time of arriving at the settlement on 3-4-81 , the workman was not under embossment of the bank and, therefore , the bipartite settlement dated 3-4-81 is not applicable to him . The non - applicant has denied the fact that the junior employees to the workman were appointed by the bank and has further stated the panel pertaining to the year 1985 was in existence only for a period of 4 years , which was scrapped in the year 1989 and the only 38 candidates out of the panel of the year 1985 could be recruited by the management. It is also the stand of the non -applicant bank that the workman has not completed 240 days of service under the employment of the bank.

4. In the evidence, the workman has submitted his affidavit. On behalf of the non - applicant , the affidavit of Sh . V K Goel , Assistant General Manager was brought on the record. Both the parties have also led the documentary evidence in support of their case respectively.

5. 1 have heard both the parties and have gone through the record.

6. The Id. representative for the workman submits that the workman had continuously worked from 8-4-81 to 26-6-81 as a 4th Class cum Farash with the non - applicant bank and had completed 80 days of service with it. He was called for the interview by the bank and after his selection, his name was placed at serial no . 59 in the panel. But he was not given the appointment and only the first 38 candidates were appointed by the management. TheId. representative further adds that in the year 1990, the management had issued a new list of selection and the junior candidates to the workman were appointed . The ld. representative has also named that one Sh . Pradeep Singh

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Rathore who was appointed out of the panel of the year 1985, but the workman who happened to be the senior candidate to him was not given the appointment by the bank.

t 7. Per contra, theld. representative for the non- applicant submits that the workman had worked for 80 days with the non -applicant bank , but the settlement dated 3-4-81 is not applicable to him since in pursuance of the clauses of the settlement only those candidates were invited for the interview who had put in 80 days full - time temporary service or 180 days part -time service in the bank, whereas the workman had joined the bank on 9-4-81 and continued up to 26-6-81 . The next contention canvassed on behalf of the bank is that in the year 1987, a new settlement was entered into between the management of Bank ofRajasthan Ltd. and its workmen and the All - India Bank of Rajasthan Employees Federation whereby the panel of the year 1985 was scrapped. Therefore , the ld. representative urges that even though the workman was not eligible as per the settlement dated 3-4-81 , yet he was called for the interview and could not be appointed as the first 38 candidates only were given appointment. Thus, as per his submission , the panel of the year 1985 does not confer any right of appointment upon the workman. And lastly, the ld . representative has also contended that the workman has not completed 240 days of actual service in the calendar year preceding to his date of termination .

8. I have bestowed my anxious consideration to the rival contentions and have scanned the record . Out of the rival submissions , the following points for determination emerge out:-

I Whether the workman is entitled for his reinstatement into the service on the basis of the bipartite settlement dated 3-4-81 ?

II. Whether the junior candidates to the workman in the panel of the year 1985 was appointed by the bank without affording an opportunity of employment to the workman?

III. Whether the panel of the year 1985 has been scrappedby virtue of the bipartite settlement dated 7-3-87?

IV. Whether the workman has completed 240 days of actual service in the calendar year preceding to his date of termination ?

Point No. I

9. The undisputed facts are that the workman had been under the employment of the bank w.e.f. 9-4-81 to 26-6-81 , that his name figured in the selection list/panel of 9565 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

the year 1985 at serial No. 59 and that a bipartite settlement was arrived at between the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. and its workmen represented by the All - India Bank of Rajasthan Employees Federation on 3-4-81 .

10. For the sake of convenience , relevant clauses of the bipartite settlement supra are reproduced as below:-

Short Recital-

from the period 9-4-81 to 26-6-81 . But all these letters of appointment indicate that the workman was appointed as apart-time peon-cum -farash for 13 hours a week. Thus, as perthe requirement under Clause 1 ( a)( i ) , the workman was not eligible for the absorption on the ground that at the most he had completed only 80 days of temporary part- time service, whereas the aforesaid clause requires that he should have completed 80 days of full -time temporary service. Secondly, clause 2 ( 1 ) (a)(i ) specifically lays down that such 180 days temporary part -time service or 80 days offull-timetemporary service of the workman must be as on the date of signing the settlement, i.e. , the cligible candidates should have completed 80 days of full-time service or 180 days of part - time service up to 3-4-81 . Apprently, the appointment of the workman commenced w.e.f. 9-4-81 which came to an end on 26-6-81. Thus , on the date of signing the settlement 3-4-81 , the workman had not remained under the employment of the bank and, therefore, this settlement cannot be attracted to his case. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the bank and against the workman .

"It was contended by the Federation that the bank hadbeen engaging temporary employees in the Sub- ordinate cadre to work in part -time vacancies as well as in the vacancies for full time leave substitutes or otherwise at various branches /departments from timeto time. In case offull time temporary vacancies, the employees were given appointment for a maximum period of 80 days whereas in case ofpart-- time employees the persons were engaged for a period not exceeding 180 days . "

Point No. II

11. Clause 2. 1 (a) ( 1) lays down as under:-

"All those temporary employees in the subordinate Irrespective of their age , educational qualification, etc. who have put in 80 days or more of full time in temporary service as well as those part time employees who have put in 180 days or more oftemporary part time service and also those who have been given appointment for 80 days of fulltimetemporary or 180 days of part time service ason the date ofsigning this settlement will be called for interviewwhich will be held separately for each of the States/Union Territories where the Bank has got its branches ."

12. Clause 2. 1 (h) is as below:-

15. Although it has been set out under point no . I that the settlement dated 3-4-81 is not attracted in the present case , yet, admittedly, the workman was called for the interview and on selection his name was placed at serial no. 59 ofthe panel of 1985. In his statement ofclaim theworkman could not be able to name any junior candidate who was appointed without affording him any opportunity ofthe employment. but in his affidavit, he has cited an instance ofone Sh . Pradeep Singh Rathore S/o Sh .Durga Shankar Rathore, who happened to be ajunior candidate to him but was appointed by the bank. In his cross- examination, he has admitted that he has not placed on recordtheappointment letter ofSh. Pradeep Singh Rathore. Onbehalfofthe bank, the panel ofthe year 1985 has been placed on the record, which stands undisputed, wherein the name of Sh. Pradeep Singh Rathore ranks at serial no. 7. Obviously, he is a senior candidate vis-a -vis to the workman whose name figures at serial no. 59. Thus , the contention advanced on behalf ofthe workman that junior persons to him were appointed is unsustainable and is rejected. Accordingly, this point is decided against the workman.

"When the said initial State-wise select/waiting list is/are exhausted then a fresh select list in the states concerned which will be on administrative district basis for part-time peons and state - wise basis for part time peons will be prepared as per norms and proceedings laid down hereinafter."

Point No. III

16. Now, 1 turn to the question as to whether the panel of the year 1985 has been scrapped by the subsequent settlement dated 7-3-877

13. These clauses echo that the bank was engaging temporary employees in the subordinate cadre who had put in 180 days of temporary part-time service and in the another category, those who had been given appointment for 80 days offull - time temporary service .

17. The Id. representative for the bank has drawn myattention towards the bipartite settlement dated 7-3-87 arrived at between the Management of the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. and their workmen as represented by the 14. Firstly, the appointment orders Ex . M - 1 to M-3 suggest that the workman was appointed by the bank 353091/04-36 9566

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] All- IndiaBank ofRajasthan Employees Federation relating to the absorption ofpermanent part -time employees in the full-time in the subordinate cadre.

by me in that dispute that the non - applicant establishment without exhausting the list of the year 1985 had prepared a selection list dated 21-11-1990 and undisputedly the juniors candidates who were selected in the year 1990 subsequent to the selection made in the year 1985 were given appointments by the non- applicant bank without affording an opportunity of employment to the workman . It was also the contention of the Id. representative for the bank that panel of 1985 could not be carried out further because it was scrapped by the subsequent settlement. Relevant para of the Award dated 26-04-2004 adjudicating onthis material point is reproduced as below- 18. It begins with the object of the settlement which reads that "the Federation representative impressed upon the Management the need to absorb on full time basis the large number of part - time confirmed employees in the subordinate cadre, serving the Bank for quite some years , inasmuch as that these part - time employees , have, to devote a major part of their time at their places of work and they have not been able to viably employ themselves elsewhere during the spare time after working from the Bank. The Federation , therefore , suggested that the procedure of appointing employees on part - time basis , temporary basis as well as daily wage- basis must be done awaywith".

"The Id. representative on behalf of the non- applicant has also urged that the candidates up to serial No. 38were given appointment by the bank and thereafter the list was scrapped and could not be carried out further. But to fortify this submission , no proof could be brought on the record . "

19. Further, its term No. 2 envisages that " as a matter of policy, no employment should be given by the Bank either on daily wage basis, temporary basis or on part-time basis in future" .

23. Suffice it to say that on account of the absence of any proof on behalf of the bank that the previous panel was scrapped, the management could not be able to substantiate its plea which was decided against it. Contrary to it, in the controversy at hand, the management has been able to place the settlement dated 7-3-1987 supra on the record and further has satisfactorily proved that in view of the aforesaid clause , the bank ceased from employing on daily wages basis and temporary basis. Thus, the facts of the Award dated 26-04-2004 are easily distinguishable in this context from the present case and the submission on behalf of the bank thus fails .

24. The bank has been successful in establishing that the panel of the year 1985 stands scrapped by virtue ofthe settlement dated 7-3-1987 . Accordingly, this point isdecided in favour of the bank .

20. It is thus abundantly clear that subsequent to the settlement dated 3-4-81 , a new settlement was arrived atbetween the management and the federation on 7-3-87 whereby it was resolved that no employment would be givenby the bank on temporary basis or on part - time basis in future. Thus , the submission made on behalf of the bank seems to have the substance when the ld . representative for the bank argues that by virtue of the subsequent settlement dated 7-3-87, the panel of the year 1985 was scrapped and it could not be carried out any further . As such, on this count also , the workman cannot claim that prior to exhausting the aforesaid panel , no fresh appointments could be made by the bank in view of clause 2 ( 1 ) (h) of the settlement dated 3-4-81.

Point No. IV

25. Now remains the question of completion of240 days of actual service by the workman under the employment ofthe bank . Neither this point has been raised before me by the Id. representative for the workman, nor it is proved on the basis of the pleadings and evidence available on the record . As such , this point is decided against the workman .

26. To conclude, the workman has not succeeded in establishing his claim, which deserves to be rejected.

21. During the course of the arguments , this Court was confronted with its earlier Award dated 26-04-2004 rendered in reference No. L- 12012/601/ 98 - IR (B - I ) ( Shri Kushal Chand Sharma v. Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.) by placing a copy of the Award on behalf of the workman and it was contended on behalf of the workman that in this case the claim of the workman Shri Kushal Chand Sharma was allowed on the similar facts . The Id. representative for the bank sought to refute this contention by contending that in that case the bank could not be able to bring on record the settlement dated 7-03-1987 and in the absence thereof the bank could not be able to establish its plea .

27. Consequently, the reference is answered in the negative against the workman and in favour of the non- applicant bank and it is held that the action of the non- applicant bank in terminating the service of the workman was justified and the claim of the workman is hereby dismissed. An award is passed in these terms accordingly.

28. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Govemment for publication under Section 17 ( 1 ) of theAct.

22. I have carefully gone through the Awarddated 26-4-2004. It is true that the facts of the referred to Award are similar to this extent that the workman in the referred case had claimed the protection of clause 2 ( i) ( h) of the settlement dated 3-4-1981 which says that when the selection is exhausted then the fresh selection list for the part-time peons will be prepared as per norms. It was held

R.C. SHARMA , Presiding Officer 9567 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2004

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide OrderNo. L -40012/249/2002 - IR (DU) dated 17-04-2003 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:

का.आ. 3170.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीनियर सुपरिन्टेन्डेन्ट ऑफ पोस्ट ऑफिसेस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 79/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-11- 2004को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the termination of Shri C. Munuswamy from the service by the management of Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Chennai is legal andjustified and if so, to what relief the workman isentitled ? "

[सं. एल-40012/249/2002- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 24th November, 2004

2.After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I. D. No. 79/2003 and notices were issued toboth the parties and both the parties entered appearance through theiradvocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

S.O. 3170.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 79/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-11-2004.

[No. L-40012/249/2002 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Tuesday, the 24th August , 2004

PRESENT :

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 79/2003

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d ) of Sub -section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) ofSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of1947) , between the Management of Department of Posts and their workmen) .

BETWEEN:

: I Party/Petitioner

Sri C. Munuswamy

AND

II Party/Management

The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices , Department of Posts , Tambaram Division , Chennai .

APPEARANCE :

:M/sS. Jothivani , Advocate

For the workman

The Petitioner is a qualified candidate for holding the post ofExtra Departmental Branch Postmaster in the II Party/Management. The post ofExtra Departmental Branch Postmaster, Pothiarankulam B.O. fell vacant on a regular basis in the year 1998 and II Party/Management issued local notification calling for applications from among the eligible candidates . The qualification prescribed for the said post is SSLC . The Petitioner submitted his application for selection and appointment . The II Party/Management considered the application submitted by the Petitioner and he was selected and appointed as Extra Departmental Delivery Agent, Pothiarankulam by an order dated 21-5-99. Further, he was issued with an order appointing him on regular basis w.e.f. 8-9-99. While so, the Petitioner was issued with an order dated 18-5-2001 by the II Party/ Management terminating his service forthwith under Rule 6(B) and Note below 6 ( a) of P&T E.D. Agents (Conduct & Service) Rules , 1964. But the order of termination has not stated any reason for termination and therefore , it is not valid in law. The Petitioner was constrained to file an applicationbefore Central Administrative Tribunal , Chennai Bench and the Central Administrative Tribunal was pleased to set aside the order of termination , since the principles of natural justice and the procedure as per rules have not been followed. Subsequently, the II Party/Management has issued show cause notice dated 26-9-2001 and even though the Petitioner has submitted his representation, the II Party/ Management passed an order terminating the services of the Petitioner. The II Party/Management has not conducted any domestic enquiry and by providing an opportunity to examine the witness to satisfy the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the order passed by the II Party/ Management is illegal and arbitrary exercise of power. Hence, he prays that an award may be passed directing the Il Party/Management to reinstate him into service.

:Mr. K. Sivajothi , ACGSC

Forthe Management 9568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

even after the dispute was referred to this Tribunal, the Petitioner has not produced any document to show that the mark sheet produced at the time of interview is a genuine one. Even assuming for argument sake that his mark sheet hasbeen eaten away by white ants, he could have obtained duplicate copy of the same from the concerned authorities before the date of enquiry, but he has not taken any steps in that direction , but he wants to rely on the Xerox copy of the mark sheet produced at the time of interview as a genuine one without producing the original . Under such circumstances, I find there is no merit in the allegation of the Petitioner that he was not provided any opportunity to prove his case . From the documents produced by the Respondent, it is clear that even after sufficient opportunity was given to the Petitioner the Petitioner has not produced original mark sheet or other duplicate copy of the mark sheet. Under such circumstances , I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief as prayed for by him . No Costs.

7. The reference is disposed of accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 24th August , 2004. )

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :-

: None Oneither side

Documents Marked:- For the I Party/Workman : ---

Ex. No. Date

Description:

WI 19-07-00 Xerox copy of the representation givenbyPetitioner to DPI , Chenni .

W2 30-05-01 Xerox copy of the order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal , Madras in O.A. No. 498/01 4. As against this , the II Party/Management in its Counter Statement has alleged that though the minimum educational qualification prescribed for applying to BPM post is a pass in X standard/ new pattern SSLC/ Matriculation , final selection will be made based on the highest marks in SSLC X Standard/ Matric or equivalent standard. Thus , the Petitioner was selected on the basis of marks in X standard . But after the verification ofhis character through District Collector , Thiruvallur and also from enquiry, it came to the knowledge of the II Party/ Management that mark sheet produced by the Petitioner is a bogus one . The same was also confirmed by one Mr. Natarajan, Secretary to the Govt . Examinations , Chennai . From this , it is clear that mark sheet produced by the Petitioner at the time of interview on 19-1-99 is a bogus one. Therefore, the Petitioner was terminated from service invoking the provisions of Rule 6 (b) and Note below Rule 6(b) of P & TED Agents ( Conduct & Service ) Rules , 1964. Subsequently, the Central Administrative Tribunal by its order set aside the termination order as no show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner. Even in that order, it is clearly mentioned that the applicant of O.A. No. 498/2001 will not be entitled for reinstatement . Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner on several occasions . But the Petitioner has not furnished any satisfactory reply for the show cause notice , therefore , his services were terminated on 28-11-2001 . From the date of appointment, he was telling that his mark shect was eaten away by white ants . If this statement was genuine, he might have got duplicate copy of mark sheet before his termination of service . Even after giving reasonable opportunity and sufficient time he was not ready to obtain a copy from the Director of Govt . Examinations , Chennai . Hence , for all these reasons, the Respondent prays that the action of the department in terminating the services of the petitioner is in order and not in violation of article 311 ( 2) of Constitution of India. Hence , he prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

W3 06-06-01 Xerox copy of the representation given by Petitioner to Respondent/ Management

5. In these circumstances , the point for my determination is-

08-01-02

"To what relief the Petitioner is entitled ? "

W4 to Senior Xerox copy of the appeal preferred by Petitioner Superintendent of Post Offices , Chennai .

Point:-

08-01-02

W5 Xerox copy of the appeal preferred by Petitioner to Senior Superintendent of Post Offices , Chennai .

For the II Party/Workman :-

Ex. No. Date

Description

MI 20-11-98 Xerox copy of the application given by Petitioner for the Post ofEDBPM 6. After marking the documents Ex . W1 to W5 and Ex . Ml to M12 on either side , neither the Petitioner nor his counsel on record appeared before the Court for argument and on hearing the arguments of the Icarned counsel for the Respondent , I find the Petitioner has not established his case that the termination order passed by the Respondent/Management is illegal and without following the principles of natural justice . The contention of the Petitioner in his claim petition is that no opportunity was given to him to establish his case that the mark sheet produced at the time of interview is a genuine one . But ,

M2 Apr. 1991 Xerox copy of the mark sheet produced by Petitioner alongwith application for the post .

9569

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

02-03-01 Xerox copy ofthe letter from DPI to Respondent regarding verification ofmark sheet.

21-09-01 Xerox copy ofthe show cause notice issued to Petitioner.

01-10-01 Xerox copy of the reply submitted by Petitioner.

12-10-01 Xerox copy of the show cause notice issued to Petitioner

20-10-01 Xerox copy of the reply submitted byPetitioner .

30-10-01

Xerox copy of the 3rd show cause notice issued to Petitioner .

05-11-01 Xeroxcopy ofthe reply ofPetitioner to show cause notice .

12-11-01

M10

Xerox copy of the 4th show cause notice issued to Petitioner.

M11 27-11-401 Xerox copy of the order of termination issued to Peti ( ioner .

M12

13-06-02 Xerox copy of the final order of Appellate Authority.

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3171- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीनियर सुपरिन्टेन्डेन्ट ऑफ पोस्ट ऑफिसेस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 98/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-11- 2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012 /245/2002- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th November , 2004 S.O. 3171.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 98/2003 ) of the Central Governrnent Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Chennai , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices and their workman. which was received by the Central Government on 24-11-2004.

[No. L -40012 /245/ 2002- IR(DU) ]

KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Friday, the 10th September, 2004

Present : K. JAYARAMAN, PresidingOfficer

Industrial Dispute No. 98/2003

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2( A) ofSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of1947) , between the Management of Department of Posts and their workmen)

BETWEEN :

: 1 Party/Petitioner Sri G.Gopinathan

AND

Management II Party/

1. The Senior Superintendent of PostOffices , Department of Posts , Tambaram Division, Chennai.

2. The Assistant Superintendent ofPostOffices, Tiruvottiyur Sub-Division , Tiruvottiyur , Chennai .

APPEARANCE :

Forthe workman

: M/s S. Jothivani , Advocate

: Mr. K. Sivajothi , ACGSC For the Management

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L-40012/245/2002 - IR(DU) dated 29-05-2003 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

"Whether the termination of Shri G. Gopinathan from the services of the Post Office by the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices is legal and justified and if so , to what relief the workman is entitled ?" 2.After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I. D. No. 98/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through theiradvocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

The Petitioner is a qualified candidate for holding the post of Extra Departmental Delivery Agent in the 9570

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SBC. 3(ii)]

clearly mentioned that the applicant of O.A. No. 499/2001 will not be entitled for reinstatement. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner on several occasions . But the Petitioner has not furnished any satisfactory reply for the show cause notice , therefore, his services were terminated on 09-12-2001 . From the date of appointment, he was telling that his mark sheet was eaten awaybywhite ants. Ifthis statement was genuine , he might havegot duplicate copy of mark sheet before his termination ofservice. Even after giving reasonable opportunity and sufficient time he was not ready to obtain a copy from the Director ofGovt. Examinations , Chennai .Hence , for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the action of the department in terminating the services of the petitioner is inorder and not in violation of Article 311 (2) of Constitution of India. Hence , he prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.

5. In these circumstances , the point for my determination is-

"Towhat relief the Petitioner is entitled ?"

Point:-

II Party/Management . The post of Extra Departmental DeliveryAgent, Pothiarankulam B.O. fell vacant on a regular basis in the year 1998 and II Party/Management issued local notification calling for applications from among the eligible candidates . The qualification prescribed for the said post is pass in VIII standard . The Petitioner submitted his application for selection and appointment . The II Party/ Management considered the application submitted by the Petitioner and he was selected and appointed as Extra Departmental Delivery Agent, Pothiarankulam by an order dated 5-3-99. Further , he was issued with an order appointing him on regular basis w.e.f. 8-9-99 . While so, the Petitioner was issued with an order dated 19-5-2001 by the II Party /Management terminating his service forthwith under Rule 6 (B) and Note below 6(a) of P&TE.D . Agents (Conduct & Service ) Rules , 1964. But the order of termination has not stated any reason for termination and therefore, it is not valid in law. The Petitioner was constrained to file an application before Central Administrative Tribunal , Chennai Bench and the Central Administrative Tribunal was pleased to set aside the order oftermination , since the principles of natural justice and the procedure as per rules have not been followed. Subsequently, the II Party/Management has issued show cause noticedated 26-9-2001 and even though the Petitioner has submitted his representation, the II Party/Management passedan order terminating the services of the Petitioner. The 11 Party/Management has not conducted any domestic enquiry and by providing an opportunity to examine the witness to satisfy the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the order passedby the Il Party/Management is illegal and arbitrary exercise of power. Hence, he prays that an award may be passed directing the II Party /Management to reinstate him into service.

6.After marking the documents Ex. W1 to W8 and Ex. Ml to M15 on either side, neither the Petitioner nor his counsel onrecord appeared before the Court for argument and on hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the Respondent, I find the Petitioner has not established his case that the termination order passed by the Respondent/Management is illegal and without following the principles of natural justice. The contention of the Petitioner in his claim petition is that no opportunity was given to him to establish his case that the mark sheet produced at the time of interview is a genuine one . But, even after the dispute was referred to this Tribunal , the Petitioner has not produced any document to show that themark sheet produced at the time of interview is a genuine one. Even assuming for argument sake that his mark sheet hasbeen eaten away by white ants, he could have obtained duplicate copy of the same from the concerned authorities before the date of enquiry, but he has not taken any steps inthat direction, but he wants to rely on the Xerox copy of the mark sheet produced at the time of interview as a genuine one without producing the original . Under such circumstances, 1 find there is no merit in the allegation of the Petitioner that he was not provided any opportunity to prove his case . From the documents produced by the Respondent, it is clear that even after sufficient opportunity was given to the Petitioner, the Petitioner has not produced original mark sheet or other duplicate copy of the mark sheet . Under such circumstances, I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief as prayed for by him . No Costs.

4. As against this, the Il Party/Management in its Counter Statement has alleged that though the minimum educational qualification prescribed for applying to EDDA post is a pass in 8th Standard with preferential qualification as X standard/ new pattern SSLC/Matriculation, final selectionwill be made based on the highest marks in SSLC X Standard/Matric or equivalent standard. Thus , the Petitioner was selected on the basis of marks in X standard. But during the verification of his marks sheet and also from enquiry, it came to the knowledge of the Il Party/ Management that mark sheet produced by the Petitioner is a bogus one . The same was also confirmed by Mr. Natarajan, Secretary to the Govt . Examinations, Chennai . From this , it is clear that mark sheet produced by the Petitioner at the time of interview was a bogus one. Therefore, the Petitioner was terminated from service invoking the provisions of Rule 6 (b) and Note below Rule 6(b) of P & TED Agents (Conduct & Service) Rules, 1964 . Subsequently, the Central Administrative Tribunal by its order set aside the termination order as no show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner. Even in that order, it is

7. The reference is disposed of accordingly.

9571 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

06-11-01

M10

Xerox copy of the reply given by Petitioner to 3rd show cause notice.

19-11-01

M11

(Dictated to the P. A. , transcribed and typedby him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 10th September, 2004. )

Xerox copy ofthe final show cause notice issued to Petitioner.

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

23-11-01

M12

Witnesses Examined :-

Xerox copy of the reply submitted byPetitioner.

None

Oneither side :

09-12-01

M13

Documents Marked:-

Xerox copy of the proceedings of ASPO.

For the I Party/Workman :-

M14

Date

08-01-02

Description

Ex. No.

Xerox copy ofthe appeal preferred byPetitioner.

W1 23-09-00

M15 26-06-02

Xerox copy of the representation givenby Petitioner.

Xerox copy of the order of SSPO , Tambaram.

W2 27-10-00 Xeгox copy of the letter from Respondent to Petitioner.

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2004 W3 06-11-00 Xerox copy of the representation givenby Petitioner to Respondent

27-03-01

Xerox copy of the statement given by Petitioner before Asstt . Superintendent of Post Offices.

15-10-01

Xerox copy of the office communication

का.आ. 3172.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार असिस्टेंट सुपरिन्टेन्डेन्ट ऑफ पोस्ट ऑफिसेस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

W6 20-10-01

[सं. एल-40011 /15 /2002- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] Xerox copy of the representation givenby I Party.

19-11-01

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी Xerox copy of the office communication.

NewDelhi, the 24th November, 2004 23-11-01

Xerox copy of the representation givenby Petitioner

For the II Party/Management:-

Date

Description

Ex. No.

M1 24-11-98 Xerox copy ofthe application given byPetitioner for the Post ofEDDA

M2 Apr. 90

S.O. 3172. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 75/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Asstt. Supdt . of Post Offices and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-11-2004.

Xerox copy of the mark sheet produced by Petitioner

[No. L-40011 /15/2002 - IR(DU)] 02-03-01

Xerox copy ofthe report ofDPI

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer M4 20-08-01 Xerox copy of the order of Central Administrative Tribunal

ANNEXURE

MS 26-09-01 Xerox copy ofthe show cause notice issued to Petitioner.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

01-10-01

Xerox copy of the reply given by Petitioner to Show cause notice.

Wednesday, the 25th August, 2004 M7 15-10-01 Xerox copy of the 2nd show cause notice issued to Petitioner.

Present: K. JAYARAMAN, PresidingOfficer 20-10-01

Industrial Dispute No. 75/2002 Xerox copy of the reply given by Petitioner to 2nd show cause notice

M9 01-11-01

(Inthematter of the dispute for adjudication under clause(d) ofsub-section (1 ) and sub-section 2 (A) of Xerox copy of the 3rd show cause notice issuedto Petitioner.

9572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management ofO/o the Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices and their workmen) .

BETWEEN :

Sri T.G. Gnanaprakasam : 1 Party/Petitioner

AND

II Party/Management

1. The Asstt. Superintendent ofPost Offices, Tiruvallur Sub Division, Tiruvallur.

2. The Branch Post Master, Tharakshi Village & Post, Oothukkottai Taluk.

APPEARANCE :

For the workman

: M/ s S.S. Swaminathan &, H. Mohamed Rafi , Advocates

For the Management : Mr. K. Sambasivam & J. Venkatesan , Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L -40011 / 15/2002 - IR(DU) dated 02-08-2002 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

any work to the Petitioner. As per rules when a vacancy arose in the Extra Department Post Office , the appointing authority namely the Respondent ought to have given local notification and also called for the list ofsuitable candidates from Employment Exchange . Though the Petitioner was working as EDDA, Tharakshi BO , the Respondent/Management transferred Mr. A. Nagan in the place ofthe Petitioner, only in order to appoint and accommodate Mr..B. Sureshkumar, the son of Mr. P.M. Balakrishnan , the Assistant Postmaster, Thiruvallur Head PostOffice. Thus , the Respondents in order to deprive the employment to the Petitioner, instead of regularising the employment of the Petitioner or recruiting for EDDA post, transferred the ED messenger , Utthukkottai Sub Post Office to Tharakshi Branch as EDDA . The Petitioner has worked with the Respondent/Management continuously for nearly 366 days . The termination by the Respondent is illegal and therefore , the Petitioner has sent a representation on 16-10-2000 to the 1st Respondent seeking his intervention to reinstate the Petitioner, but it did not invoke any response till date . Hence , he raised an industrial dispute before the labour authorities and on failure on conciliation , the matter was referred to this Tribunal . Hence, the Petitioner prays that the an award may be passed directing the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner in service with continuity of service , back wages and consequential relief.

"Whether the action of the Assistant Suprintendent of Post Offices , Thiruvallur Sub-Division , Tiruvallur in denying employment to Shri T.G. Gnanaprakasam with effect from 2-9-2000 isjustified ? If not, to what relief, is he entitled ?"

2. After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I. D. No. 75/2002 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:-

The Petitioner was appointed as Extra Departmental Delivery Agency, Tharakshi branch post office on 13-8-1999 and had been working as Extra Departmental Delivery Agent from 1-9-99 till 31-8-2000. While so, the 2nd Respondent by a memo No. B16-7/ 2 dated 30-8-2000 transferred the E.D. messenger , Utthukottai and one Mr. Nagan has appointed as EDDA, Tharakshi and thereby denying

4. As against this , the Respondent/Management in the Counter Statement alleged that the regular incumbent ofthe post ofEDDA, Tharakshi branch post office one Sri S. Karunakaran was selected as postman and the above said post fell vacant and in that place, the Petitioner worked as a substitute in the vacant post from 2-9-1999 to 01-09-2000. As per the departmental rules , when a post fall vacant, the post should be filled up by calling for list of suitable candidates from Employment Exchange and by local notification calling for applications from local residents and the criteria for selection is merit . In that case, Sri T.S. Gnanaprakasam namely Petitioner herein , was not a regularly selected but only a substitute locally arranged by the Branch Postmaster to carry out the day to day work ofthe vacant post. Mr. Nagan , E.D. Messenger, Utthukottai Sub-Post Office had applied for transfer to the post of EDDA, Tharakshi branch office and as he had fulfilled all the required conditions for transfer, he was transferred to Tharakshi branch w.e.f. 2-9-2000 as EDDA and the substitute arrangement was terminated. The Petitioner was not appointed as EDDA, Tharakshi branch office after 9573 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 1 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

following the prescribed recruitment rules. Hence , he has no hold over the post. He has not been given any appointment order. The Petitioner being a leave substitute and not a regular employee , he cannot seek protection of his employment . Hence , for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.

Tharakshi Branch Post Office as EDDA without any complaint whatsoever in respect of his duties and work and he has continuously worked for more than 366 days in a continuous period of 12 months and he has worked on the fond hope that his services would be regularised and confirmed by the Respondent authorities , but all of a sudden his services were terminated by the Respondent, which is against the provisions of labour legislations.

5. In these circumstances , the points for my determination are :-

(i) "whether the action of the 1st Respondent in denying employment to the Petitioner is justified?"

(ii) "To what relief the Petitioner is entitled?"

Point No. 1:

9. In order to substantiate this claim he argues that one Mr. B. Sureshkumar , S /o . P.M. Balakrishnan was appointed in his place at the first instance and subsequently, he has been ousted, the Petitioner has sent for documents from the Respondent/Management . With regard to the order passed by the 1st Respondent , which is marked as Ex. M1 , wherein the 1st Respondent has passed an order that Mr. Sureshkumar, S/ o P.M. Balakrishnan may be utilised as EDDA with immediate effect and it is further stated that it is only a stop gap arrangement , until further orders . The Petitioner further contended that subsequent to the appointment of Mr. Sureshkumar, Tharakshi village people objected with regard to his conduct and other things and therefore, he has been ousted only to accommodate the said person in Utthukottai and the Utthukottai-man has been transferred to Tharakshi Branch Post Office and thereby ousted the Petitioner's service . But there is no proof to show that the said Mr. Sureshkumar was appointed at Utthukottai and only for giving appointmentto Mr. Sureshkumar, Sri A: Nagan hás been transferred to Tharakshi .

6. It is an admitted case of both sides that Tharakshi Branch Post Office's regular incumbent of EDDA was selected as Postman and the above post namely Extra Departmental Delivery Agent of Tharakshi Branch fell vacant w.e.f. 2-9-99 . Further, it is also admitted that the Petitioner who was a native of Tharakshi was posted as a substitute in the vacant post . It is also further admitted by both sides that as per the Respondent's departmental rules, when a post fall vacant , the post should be filled up by calling for list of suitable candidates from the Employment Exchange and by local notification calling for applications from the local residents . But, in the case of appointment of Petitioner this procedure has not been followed and he has been appointed by the Postmaster at Tharakshi and subsequently it was approved by the Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices .

10. On behalf of the Petitioner it is contended that the appointment of Mr. Sureshkumar is illegal and also the transfer made to Mr. Nagan was also not according to the rules framed by the Respondent/Management. But, no provisionofrule was placed before this court to show that the transfer made by the Respondent with regard to Mr. Nagan to Tharakshi is illegal . Under such circumstances , I find there is no force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner.

7. It is the contention of the Respondent that Mr. Nagan , E.D. Messenger, Utthukottai Sub Post Office had applied for transfer to the post of EDDA, Tharakshi and as he had fulfilled all the required conditions for transfer, he was transferred as EDDA, Tharakshi Branch Post Office in the place of the Petitioner .

11. On behalf of the Respondent it is contended that even as per E.D. Agents recruitment rules for provisional appointment also , the Employment Exchange has to be addressed and appointment should be made only from the candidates sponsored by Employment Exchange. Since the appointment of Petitioner was made as stop gap arrangement, the procedure followed by the Respondent in appointing him on provisional basis is not valid. Further, itiscontended that since the Petitioner's appointment was onprovisional basis , that can be terminated at any time as per rules and since the Respondents have not followed the procedure in appointing the Petitioner on provisional basis and since Sri Nagan requested the department to transfer 8. But , as against this , it is the contention of the Petitioner that this transfer of Mr. Nagan in place of the Petitioner was only in order to appoint and accommodate Mr. Sureshkumar, son of Mr. P.M. Balakrishnan, the Assistant Sub Postmaster, Thiruvallur Head Post Office and it is vehemently contented on behalf of the Petitioner that in order to deprive the employment to the Petitioner and only to accommodate Mr. Sureshkumar, S/o P.M. Balakrishnan, this transfer was effected and therefore , it is not legal and it is against the rules and regulations. It is also the contention of the Petitioner that he has worked in 353091104-37 9574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] him as EDDA to Tharakshi and as he had fulfilled all the required conditions for transfer, he was transferred as EDDA, Tharakshi branch post office and it cannot be questioned by the Petitioner.

12. Then, again it is contended on behalf of the Petitioner that he has worked more than 366 days in a continuous period of one year and therefore, his service has to be regularised .

he has been registered his name in the Employment Exchange and the appointment has not been made as per the procedure . Under such circumstances , I find the services of the Petitioner which is illegal cannot be regularised by this Tribunal. In these circumstances, I find it cannot be possible to accept the request of the Petitioner that his services should be regularised. The only possible way that can be done for the Petitioner is to direct the Respondent/Management to keep his name in thepanel and ifthe Petitioner is registered with Employment Exchange and is qualified to be appointed for the relevant post, preference must be given to the Petitioner in employment, whenever there occurs a vacancy in the regularpost.

Point No. 2 :

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

15. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the Petitioner is not entitled to the relief of regularisation, but the Respondents are directed to keep the Petitioner's name on a panel and ifhe is registered with Employment Exchange and is qualified for appointment for the relevant post, he must be given preference whenever there occurs a vacancy in regular post. No costs .

16. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th August , 2004.)

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :-

For the I Party/Workman

WWI Sri T.S. Gnanaprakasam

None

Forthe II Party/Management:

Documents Marked :--

Forthe I Party/Workman:-

Ex. No. Date Description

WI 16-10-2000 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Respondent / Management

Forthe II Party/Management: -

13. But, I find there is no substance in the contention ofthe learned counsel for the Petitioner because as per the judgment of Supreme Court reported in 1992 II LLJ 452, wherein the Supreme Court has held that " Court has to take note of the pernicious consequences to which the direction for regularisation ofworkmen on the only ground that they have put in work for 240 or more days has been leading . It had become a common practice to ignore the Employment Exchange and the persons registered in the Employment Exchange and to employ or get employed directly those who are either not registered with the Employment Exchange or who though registered are lower in the long awaiting list in the employment register. Such employment is sought and given directly for various illegal considerations including money. The employment is given first for temporary periods with technical breaks to circumvent the relevant rules and is continued for 240 or more days witha view to give the benefit of regularisation knowing thejudicial trend that those who have completed 240 or more days are directed to be automatically regularised . A good deal of illegal employment market has developed resulting in a new source of corruption and frustration of those who are waiting at the Employment Exchange for years . The other injurious effect of indiscriminate regularisation has been that many of the agencies have stopped undertaking casual for temporary works , though they are urgent and essential for fear that if those who are employed on such works are required to be continued for 240 or more days have to be absorbed as regular employees, although the works are time bound and there is no need for the workmen beyond the completion of the works. The public interest are thus, jeopardised on both counts . " Relying on this decision, the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that though the Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days, his appointment is not a regular appointment and the appointment made by Branch Postmaster cannot be validated by raising this dispute before this Tribunal .

Ex. No. Date Description

14. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent because in this case the appointment of Petitioner to Tharakshi Branch Office as EDDA, the procedure laid down by the department has not been followed . Further, the Petitioner has not stated that

21-09-99 Хегox copy of the letter from Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices , Tiruvalluvar to The Branch Postmaster, Tharakshi .

9575 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

APPEARANCES :

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2004

For the Workman : M/s. S. Jothivani Advocates

For the Management : Mr. K.M. Venugopal, ACGSC

AWARD

का. आ. 3173.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सुपरिन्टेन्डेन्ट ऑफ पोस्ट ऑफिस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 78/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L-40012/246/2002 - IR(DU) dated 17-04-2003 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

[सं. एल -40012/246/2002- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th November, 2004

"Whether the termination of service of Shri K. Nagarajan , E.D. Packer by the management of Superintendent of Post Offices , Sivaganga , Department of Posts is justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to" .

2. After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 78/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

S.O. 3173.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 78/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Supdt. ofPost Offices and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-11-2004.

[No. L-40012/246/2002- IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 15th September, 2004

PRESENT:

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 78/2003

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section (1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1974 (14 of 1947) , between the Management of Department of Posts and their workmen)

BETWEEN :

Shri K. Nagarajan :

IParty/Petitioner AND

II Party/Management

1. The Superintendent of PostOffices, Department ofPosts , Sivaganga Division, Sivaganga.

ThePetitioner was appointed as Extra Departmental Delivery Agent at Marakathur B.O. in the year 1989 . Subsequently he was transferred as Extra Departmental Branch Postmaster at Marakathur B.O. from 6-2-1995 and he was placed under put off duty w.e.f. 30-11-1999 By the 2nd Respondent while he was working as EDPBM. The allegations against the Petitioner at that time was he had misappropriated the Government money but actually, no misappropriation has taken place, but the non -credit of amount was due to the delay in collecting the amount. Subsequently, the 1st Respondent has influenced him to admit the charges , so that he would be let off with minor punishment and on believing the words of 1st Respondent, the Petitioner has admittect the charges but to his shock and surprise, he was imposed with the punishment of removal from service by an order dated 9-3-2000 . Immediately he approached the 1st Respondent and the 1stRespondent convinced him by stating that he would beprovided another job . He was also appointed as a Extra Departmental Packer at Velihiyur S.O. and he was working inthat place till 16-1-2002. It was a regular vacancy caused dueto transfer of the regular holder of the post . Again to his shock and surprise, he was issued with show-cause notice dated 3-12-2001 by the 2nd Respondent regarding the proposal of terminating the services of the Petitioner stating that he has been erigaged to work as E.D. Packer, Vethiyur against the rules and without following the recruitment procedure and granted 15 days time for submission of his reply. Sirice the period of 15 days granted to him for submission of his reply was insufficient, the Petitioner requested for further twenty days for submission ofhis reply. The punishment of removal from service will 2. The Sub Divisional Inspector (Postal) Sivaganga Sub Division, Sivaganga.

9576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANΝΑ 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

{

removal imposed on a person will not exclude the person from getting re - employment, but the question of employment has to be decided as a fresh case without giving weightage to previous employment and that too should be decided after following regular employment procedure. In this case, since the Petitioner was appointed without following regular appointment, the order passed against him is justified. Hence, for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that claim may be dismissed with costs.

5. In these circumstances, the points for my consideration are-

not exclude a person from getting re- employment . As such it cannot be said that the Petitioner has been re - engaged in the department against the existing rules and provisions of law. The Petitioner was employed as E.D. Packer onlyby way ofpunishment forfeiting his earlier service and as such it cannot be said that he was appointed to a new post without following the recruitment procedure. But on 12-1- 2002, the 2nd Respondent has terminated the Petitioner from the post ofE.D. Packer, Vethiyur. The termination of service of the Petitioner amounts to illegal and arbitrary exercise ofpower and unfair labour practice and it is in violation of provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, for all these reasons , he prays the Tribunal to pass an award in his favour.

(i) "Whether the termination of services of the Petitioner as E.D. Packer by the Respondent/Management is justified?

(ii) "To what relief, the Petitioner is entitled?"

Point No. 1 :-

Inthis case , the Petitioner examined himself as WWI and produced documents Ex. WI to W19 and on the side ofthe Respondent/Management one Mr. G. Kumarasamy, Senior Superintendent of Post Offices , Sivaganga was examined as MWI and on their side .Ex. M1 to M6 were marked.

7. In this case, it is admitted by both sides that the Petitioner was initially appointed as Extra Departmental DeliveryAgent at Marakathur B.O. on 23-12-89 and he was transferred and posted as Extra Departmental Branch Postmaster at Marakathur branch B.O. on 6-2-95. Since there was a shortage of money and he was not sending money orders for payment, though he was provided with sufficient cash for money order payment, he was charge sheeted and he was dismissed from service by the Superintendent of Post Offices, Sivaganga by an order dated21-1-97 and in appeal , the Director of Postal Services, Madurai Division modified the said punishment as Censure and he was reinstated in service and subseuently he repeated the same offence of misappropriation of cash and since the postal department cannot take this as leniently, the Petitioner was once again charge sheeted for the short of cash of Rs . 664/- and for fraudulent payment of money order by forging the signatures of payees . Against this , though he has contested the matter, subsequently, he admitted his guilt and therefore, the Superintendent of Post Offices, Sivaganga has passed an order dated 9-3-2000 terminating the services of the Petitioner. But, subsequently the Petitioner was re-engaged asE.D. Packer at Vethiyur and while he was working as Extra Departmental Packer he was issued with show cause notice stating that he was appointed against the rules and made without following the prescribed procedure and an explanationwas called for from him. Since he has not given any reply, the 2nd Respondent set him ex- parte on 12-1-2002 and gave an order terminating the services ofthe Petitioner from 16-1-2002 .

4. As against this, the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction atall in view ofthe law laid down by the Supreme Court on the legal basis that the department is only doing sovereign function and there is no master and servant relationship and it is not for profit motive and hence, it is not an industry to attract Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Petitioner at the first instance was appointed as Extra Departmental Delivery Agent at Marakathur branch post office on 23-12-89 and subsequently he was posted as Extra Departmental Branch Postmaster at Marakathur B.O. w.e.f. 6-2-95 . Since he kept cash shortage of Rs . 5613.50 on 6-12-95 and he was also not sending out money orders for payment, though he was provided with sufficient cash for money order payment. Charge sheet was issued against thePetitioner and was dismissed from service by an order dated 21-1-97. The Petitioner filed an appeal against the order ofdismissal . The Director of Postal Services , Madurai considered his appeal and modified the punishment as censure and reinstated him in service w.e.f. 21-8-97 . But he repeated the same offence of commission of misappropriation of cash which cannot be taken leniently. The Petitioner once again misappropriated cash of Rs. 664/- on 20-11-99 fraudulently on payment of nioney orders by forging the signatures of payees . For this the Petitioner was charge sheeted by the Ist Respondent on 18-1-2000 and he was heard in person on 28-2-2000 in the presence of Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices and Sub Divisional Inspector . Subsequently, he was imposed with the punishment of removal from service on 9-3-2000. No doubt , the Petitioner was re - engaged temporarily to meet particular need in specified given time. Since the re- engagement of the Petitioner to work as E.D. Packer at Vethiyur was against the rules and made without following the prescribed procedure, the 2nd Respondent issued show-cause notice on 3-12-2001 giving 15 days time and extension of 10 more days for termination of the re- engagement . Since no reply was received to the show cause notice in spite of sufficient opportunities given, the 2nd Respondent finalised the case as ex - parte on 12-1-2002 and he gave termination order of the Petitioner in person on 16-1-2002 . No doubt, it is true that the punishment of

8. On behalf of the Petitioner, it is contended that though he was given the punishment of removal from 9577 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

there was no interview held for the appointment of E.D. packer, Vethiyur and as such the Petitioner was not appointed regularly in not following any procedure and it can be said as irregular and under such circumstances , after due euquiry, the 2nd Respondent has terminated the services ofthe petitioner. Under such circumstances , I find there is no point in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that this passed by the Respondent is illegal and as such, 1 find this point against the petitioner. Point No. 2 :

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled?

12. In view of my foregoing findings that the order passed against the Petitioner is not illegal, 1 find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief as claimed by him .

service on 9-3-2000 on the admission of the Petitioner, the admission was obtained by the 1st Respondent by undue influence and therefore , he was again re -appointed as Extra Departmental Packer at Vethiyur Post Office . Therefore , it cannot be said that his appointment as E.D. Packer at Vethiyur is a new appointment . But , the Petitioner has not produced any document to show that his admission of the offence made against him was under undue influence of the 1st Respondent . Though on the side of the Petitioner it is argued that his re -engagement as E.D. Packer to work in the postal department is only an alternate employment by way ofpunishment after passing the order of removing the Petitioner from the post of Extra Departmental Branch Postmaster at Marakathur B.O. and as such the subsequent order of termination of the Petitioner amounts to illegal and arbitrary exercise of power and unfair labour practice.

13. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him. corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 15th September, 2004.)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :-

WW1 Sri . K. Nagarajan

For the I Party /Workman :

MW1 Sri G. Kumarasamy

For the II Party/Management :

Documents Marked :---

For the I Party/Workman :

9.But, I find there is no point in the contention ofthe learned counsel for the Petitioner because the re- appointment ofthe Petitioner as Extra Departmental Packer, Vethiyur S.O. is a separate issue and there is no connection between the four punishment imposed by the 1st respondent on 9-3-2000 . Merely because the Petitioner was re- appointed to the post of Extra Departmental Packer, Vethiyur, it cannot be said that the Petitioner was given an alternative employment by way of punishment after passing the order removing the him from the post ofExtra Departmental Branch Postmaster, Marakathur.

Ex. No.

Date Description

W1 30-11-1999 Xerox copy of the order of put off duty issued to Petitioner .

W2 6-12-1999 Xerox copy of the order ratifying the order ofput off duty.

W3 7-2-2000 Xerox copy of the explanation submitted by Petitioner.

W4 28-2-2000 Xerox copy of the personal hearing given to Petitioner.

W5 9-3-2000 Xerox copy of the order of removal issued to petitioner.

10. The learned counsel for the Petitioner further argued that the Petitioner has been re - appointed on 19-4-2000 . and he served as Extra Departmental Packer at Vethiyur till 16-1-2002 under such circumstances , after a long lapse of time , the 2nd Respondent has issued show- cause notice that his appointment as E. D. Packer, Vethiyur is not proper and made without following the prescribed procedure and it is only an afterthought to victimise the petitioner from working as Extra Departmental Packer at Vethiyur S. O. and therefore , it is not legal and justified.

W6 17-4-2000 Xerox copy of the order appointing the Petitioner as E.D. Packer.

W7 19-4-00 Xerox copy of the memo of assumption of charges.

4-7-2000 Xerox copy of the order of appointment .

W8 W9 18-1-2001 Xerox copy of the memo of charges .

W10 3-12-2001 Xerox copy of the notice of termination .

W11 18-12-2001. Xerox copy of the letter requesting extension of time for submitting Reply.

W12 20-12-2001 Xerox copy of the letter requesting extension of time for submitting Reply.

W13 24-12-2001 Xerox copy of the order granting ten days time for submission of Explanation.

W14 29-12-2001 Xerox copy of the letter requesting further Extension of time for submitting Reply.

W15 12-01-2002 Xerox copy of the order of temination .

W16 12-01-2002 Xerox copy of the explanation submitted by petitioner.

W17 Nil Xerox copy of the 2A petition filed by petitioner.

11. But, here again I find there is no point in the contention ofthe learned counsel for the Petitioner because since the prescribed procedure has not been followed in this for appointment of Extra Departmental Packer, the Respondent has got every right to question and hence show cause notice was also issued to him questioning the appointment . Since the Petitioner has not given any reply, even after reasonable opportunity was given to him, it cannot be said that the action initiated by the 2nd Responent is illegal . When the Petitioner has not established before this Tribunal that his admission made before the 1st Respondent in the previous case has been obtained by undue influence , it cannot be said that the order impugned passed by the 1st Respondent on 9-3-2000 is illegal . Though the Petitioner was re-appointed, since the re - appointment was not in order and it is against the procedure laid down by the rules and regulations , show cause notice was issued to him questioning the appointment. There was no notification of vacancy and 9578

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART M-SEC . 3 (ii) ] W18 Nil Xerox copy of the reply filed by Respondent/ Management .

W19 29-10-2002 Xerox copy of the failure report .

For the II Party/ Management :-

Ex . No. Date Description

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1974 ( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Superintendent ofPosts Offices , Karaikudi Division and their workman).

BETWEEN :

M1 21-01-1997 Xerox copy of the proceedings of Post Offices, of superintendent manamadurai Division

(

ShriV. Palanichamy

IParty/Petitioner AND

M2 7-8-1997 Xerox copy of the order of Director of Postal Services , Madurai

M3 9-3-2000 Xerox copy of the Proceedings of Superintendent of Post Offices , Sivaganga .

1. The Superintendent of Post Offices , Karaikudi Division, Karaikudi . : II Party/Management M4 3-12-2001 Xerox copy of the letter from SDI ( P ) Sivaganga Sub Division to Petitioner

M5 12-01-2002 Xerox copy of the order of Sub Divisional Inspector terminating the services of Petitioner on reemployment .

2. The Assistant Superintendent ofPost Offices, Department ofPosts, Devakottai Sub-Division, Devakottai

APPEARANCE :

M6 2-1-2002 Xerox copy of the order of Central Administrative Tribunal , Madras In O.A. No. 58/2002 .

For the Workman : M/ s . S. Jothivani & A. Laksmi Advocates नई दिल्ली , 24 नवम्बर, 2004

Forthe Management : Mr. K.M. Venugopal , ACGSC

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L-40012/ 10/2003 - IR(DU) dated 06-05-2003 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

का. आ. 3174.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सुपरिन्टेन्डेन्ट ऑफ पोस्ट ऑफिस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 81/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the management of Superintendent ofPost Offices, Karaikudi in removing Shri V. Palanichamy, Extra Departmental Delivery Agent from service is just and legal? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled? "

[सं. एल-40012/10/2003- आई.आर. (डी.यू.) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 24th November, 2004

2. After the receipt of the reference, it was taken on file as I.D. No. 81/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

S.O. 3174.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 81/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Supdt . of Post Offices and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24-11-2004.

[No. L-40012/ 10/2003 - IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Tuesday, the 21st September, 2004

PRESENT :

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 81/2003

The Petitioner was appointed as Extra Departmental Delivery Agent at Periyakarai Branch Post Office by the 2nd Respondent . He is the appointing authority as well as the Disciplinary Authority for the Petitioner. While so, the Petitioner due to sudden illness has applied for leave on medical grounds from 25-3-96 to 20-03-98 . He underwent treatment at Devakottai and Coimbatore. The Petitioner has applied for leave duly supported by medical certificate through the Sub Postmaster, Devakottai . But, it is learnt that the II Party/Management has granted leave only upto 21-7-1996 and it is further learnt that further leave has not been granted. While so, the Superintendent of Post Offices, Devakottai had made a false complaint against the I Party that he left India only with a view to get provisional appointment of his son Mr. Sukumar, though the petitioner is very much available at Devakottai at his residence and underwent medical treatment during that period. After 9579 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Tribunal . Therefore, the Respondent prays that the claim maybe dismissed with costs.

5. In these circumstances , the points for my consideration are:-

(1) "Whether the action of the Respondent/ Manage- ment in removing the Petitioner from service is just and legal ? "

(ii) "To what relief, the Petitioner is entitled?"

Point No. 1 :-

recovering from illness , the Petitioner tried to join the post, but the Petitioner was prevented from doing so. Even though he made so many representations , the Respondent has not given any reply and finally it is learnt that he was terminated from service on 3-1-98 by issuing orders. Though , the Respondent alleged that the Respondent conducted the domestic enquiry, the domestic enquirywas not fair and proper and no notice was issued to the Petitioner and it cannot be presumed that the Petitioner had absented himself from enquiry proceedings deliberately despite the information . Under such circumstances , the Petitioner prays that an award may be passed to reinstate him in service as EDDA, Periakarai with all consequential relief.

6. Even though the Petitioner has filed Claim Statement and filed documents subsequently, he never appeared befroe this Tribunal for enquiry. Further, his advocate also not appeared before this Tribunal for conducting trial . Therefore, the Petitioner was set exparte and exparte proceedings was taken against him. From the allegations of the Petitioner, though he has stated that he was fell ill for a continuous period ofthree years , I find he has not established this fact with any satisfactory evidence. Further, though he has alleged that domestic enquiry alleged to have held by the Respondent is not just and proper and no notice was served upon him legally , he has not established this fact also before this Tribunal with any satisfactory evidence. Further , the Petitioner has not appeared before this Court to substantia his claim. Under such circumstances , I find the Respondent has conducted the domestic enquiry in a fair and proper manner and therefore, the order passed by the Respondent removing the Petitioner from service is just and legal.

Point No. 2:-

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled?

7. In view of my foregoing findings that the order passed by the Respondent against the Petitioner is just and legal , 1 find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief as claimedby him.

8.The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him . corrected andpronouncec by me in the open court on this day the 21st September, 2004.)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined: -

On either side :

None

Decouments Marked: s-

On either side :

Nil

4. As against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide the dispute in question on the ground that II Party/ Management is not at all an industry to attract the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Any how, without prejudice to the above contention , the Respondent contended that the I Party was appointed as EDDA, Periakarai by the II Party/ Management . The I Party alleged to have applied for leave from 25-3-96 to 20-03-98 continuously for the alleged sudden kidney illness , but no leave application has been received by the II Party / Management after 1-9-96 . Though the I party applied for leave from 15-3-96 to 31-8-96 the II Party/Managemnt granted leave from 15-3-96 to 31-7-96 only. The rest ofthe period under leave of the I Party is not covered by sanction of Il Party/ Management . Under Rule 5 of P & T EDA (Conduct & Service) Rules , 1964 an E.D. employee can be granted leave only for a maximum period of 180 days and no EDDA could be permitted to take leave or remain absent for more than 90 days at a stretch, which may be extended up to 180 days in exceptional circumstances by the Divisional Superintendent . On confidential enquiry, it was found that the Petitioner was out of India , therefore, the II party /Management issued notice to I Party on 7-8-96 in which itwas informed that any further leave beyond 31-8- 96would not be granted and further II Party/Management requested in that letter that Petitioner should rejoin duty immediately on or before 1-9-96 . Since the letter was returned stating that 'party has left India ' , a domestic enquiry was ordered and in that enquiry, the witnesses were examined and after due enquiry, the Enquiry Officer has held that the Petitioner has left India and as such under Rule 8 of P & T EDA (Conduct & Service) Rules, the enquiry was strictly conducted as per rules and the finding was given against the Petitioner. Having remained silent from 3-1-98 to 14-1-2001 i.e. for a continuous period of three years , the Petitioner cannot come before this Tribunal that his request has to the considered . The Petitioner is belatedly approaching the Labour Commissioner and also the 9580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3175.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 61/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -12011/276/2000 - आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी० गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004

S.O. 3175. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 61/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour- cum-Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management ofPunjab National Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 18-11-2004.

[No. L- 12011/276/2000- IR (B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT:

SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer

I. D. NO . 61/2001 Ref. No. L- 12011 /276/2000/IR (B - II)dtd . 22-3-01

BETWEEN : Punjab National Bank Employees Union State Vice President, PNBEU (UP) Param Dham Vishnu Dham Colony, NewMadav Nagar, Saharanpur- (UP) 247001

AND

Punjab National Bank, The Regional Manager, PNB , Regional Office, Church Compound, Shajoria Road , Saharanpur (UP)

AWARD

Punjab National Bank Employees Union has filed the statement of claim alleging therein that the Extension Counter, GVPS , Rampur Maniharan , Saharanpur is working under the branch of Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur, Where subordinate staff is performing all the prescribed duties ofDaftary i.e. sorting & stitching vouchers , filing of letters to proper file , to keep old record, properly, to assisting in issuing stationary etc. since the date of opening of extension counter. The office incharge of extension counter GVPS , Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur has confirmed toBranch Manager, Rampur Maniharan vide his letter dt . 18-9-97 that the duties ofdaftry is being performed by the member of sub staff. He also recommended to get sanction of daftary allowance from regional manager, Saharanpur to sub staff working at extension counter. The person who is discharging his work carrying with greater responsibilities then routine work shall have a special allowance than an ordinary staff, which has provided by Shastri Award, Desai Award & Bipartite settlements . The head office of bank has also issued the guide lines to all zonal/ regional managers vide its personal division circular letter no . 30/88 dt. 13-5-88 to sanction the daftari allowance atall offices . The extension counter GVPS Rainpur has also one office where daftary allowance should be sanction since date of opening of extension counter. Union requested to the regional manager , Saharanpur to sanction daftary allowance at extension counter, GVPS, Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur but regional manager did not care . The action ofRegional Manager, Saharanpur is against Desai Award, Shastri Award, Bipartite settlements and PDCL 30/88 dt. 13-5-88 . It has therefore been prayed by the union that the Tribunal should hold that the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in not sanctioning Daftry allowance atextension counter GVPS, Rampur Maniharan , Saharanpur is illegal & injustified and the Tribunal should allow the sub staff entitlement to get sanction daftary allowance working at extension counter GVPS , Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur . It has been alleged in the rejoinder that the sub staff of extension counter, GVPS , Rampur Maniharan Saharanpur is performing the duties of daftry. It has also beenalleged that all the vouchers at extension counter, Rampur Maniharan are being sorted stiched by extension counter by sub staff. On the instructions of the Branch Manager Rampur Maniharan Saharanpur all the stiched vouchers are sent by extension to main branch . The long books as well as Day book are also written at extension counter.

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide their order No. L- 12011 /276/ 2000 /IR( B - II ) dated 22-3-01 referred the following issue to the Presiding Officer, CGIT- cum -Labour Court , Lucknow for adjudication ;

"Whether the action of the Management in not sanctioning the Daftry Allowance at Ex- Counter GVPS , Rampur , Maniharan, Saharanpur is just fair and justified ? If not , what relief union is entitled to ? "

Punjab National Bank has filled written statement and has alleged that the dispute has not been duly and validly espoused by the said union in as much as the union has not filed any document on record to indicate the espousal of the cause by the body of workmen or to indicate that the said office bearer of the union is authorised to raise the alleged industrial dispute. As such , the alleged dispute cannot be termed as industrial dispute in terms of भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

section 2 (k) ofthe I.D. Act. 1947. It is further alleged that Divisional Secretary of the union is not authorised to raise the dispute before the authorities under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 in terms of the constitution ofthe said union and for this reason the so called dispute raised by the said union is not maintainable . The bank management has alleged chapter 5 ofthe Bipartite settlement provided enteralia that special allowance is payable where a workman is required to perform additional duties prescribed for such special allowance carrying post. For the post ofdaftry, the following duties are prescribed:

1. Simple binding of books and registers;

2. Press-copying;

3. filing, independently letters and other papers in respective files as per indications marked thereon;

4. Assisting in issuing stationary ;

5. stacking under guidance , old records in orderly manner and assisting in giving them out when required;

6. Undertaking the whole process of sorting.. arranging, numbering, tallying the total number of and stitching the vouchers .

The management has denied that the employee concerned is performing daftary duties at extension counter, Rampur Maniharn , Saharanpur . The bank has laid down the following criteria for sanction of daftary allowance.

i. The average number of vouchers per day at the extension counter is more than 50 ; and ii. All the vouchers are sorted and stitched at the extension counter itself.

iii. All the sorted and stitched vouchers are retained and kept at the extension counter.

iv. The vouchers & long book of the extension counter is not included in the day book of the mainbranch.

At the Extension Counter, Rampur Maniharan though the daily average number of vouchers is above 50, but these vouchers are neither sorted/stiched nor are kept at the extension counter . All the vouchers are kept at main branch only stitched with the vouchers of the main branch. Thus, the extension counter is not eligible for sanction of daftry allowance as all the prescribed parameters are not fulfilled. The management has admitted that the officer incharge of extension counter Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur had recommended to sanction post of Daftry attheir office, to Regional officer, but the same was not found acceptable by the bank for the reasons stated above. The employees in subordinate cadre at extension counter is not performing the duties of daftriy as stated herein above and is not entitled to special allowance in terms of provisions of Bipartite settlement . It is also alleged that PDCL 30/88 is not applicable to the facts and circumstances 3530 G1/04-38

9581 ofthe present case as the said circular is not meant for and applicable to the extension counters . This circular is applicable to only newly opened branches as clarified by the Head Officer of the bank vide letter dated 16.2.89 . The bank has therefore requested that the union has no merit and is not entitled to any relief.

The statement of claim has been filed by the Divisional Secretary, Sri S.K. Pathak whereas in the order of reference State Vice President , PNB Employees Union was authority.

Following photo state copies of the documents has been filed on behalf of the union.

1. Photo copy of letter of office incharge of extension counter addressed to Branch Manager , Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur dtd. 12-9-97.

2. Photo copy of letter of office incharge ofextension counter toBranch Manager , Rampur Maniharan , Saharanpur dtd. 14-10-97.

3. Personal Divn , circular No.30/88 dtd. 13-5-88 4. Attendance register of branch office , Fatehpur for the month of Jan. 2001 .

5. Extract of attendance register of extension counter for the month Jan.2001 .

6.Extract ofattendance register ofextension counter for the month ofDec. 2000.

7. Extract of attendance register of branch office Deopand for the month of Jan. 2001 .

8. Extract of attendance register of extension counter underbranch of office ofAvas Vikas for the month ofDec.2001.

9. Extract of day book of Extension counter GRPS . Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur under branch office Rampur of 1-10-2001 .

10. Extract of extension counter GRPS of 1-10-01 of Rampur Maniharan , Saharanpur .

11. Letter dtd . 12-9-97 written by officer incharge extension counter Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur 12. Letter dtd. 14-10-97 written to extension counter Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur.

13. PDCL 30/88 dtd . 13-5-88

TheJoint Secretary, S.K. Pathak of the trade union has filed affidavit but he has not appeared for cross examination. ::

The opposite party has filed following photo copies ofdocuments;

1. Letter of Sr. Manager, IR. address to ChiefManager dt. 16-2-89 ofpersonal Divn. New Delhi. ২.

2.Covering slip of vouchers of 24-12-01 of branch office Rampur Maniharan , Saharanpur .

9582

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3. Copy of vouchers for the month of Dec. 2001 .

4. Copy of attendance register for the month of Dec.2001 of extension counter under branch office of Deoband.

5. Extract of attendance register for the month of Dec. 01 of extension counter of Fatehpur.

6. Copy of attendance register for the month of Dec. 01 of Fatehpur branch .

7. Copy of supplementary salary bill for the month of Dec.01 ofbranch of Fatehpur.

8. Copy of attendance register for the month of July, 00 of extension counter collectorate , SRE under BO :NAV Colony, Saharanpur.

9. Copy of attendance register for the month ofDec.01 ofextension counter, Collectorate, SRE Under NAV Colony, Saharanpur.

10. Copy of supplementary salary bill for the month ofDec. 01 .

11. Copy of attendance register for the month of Jan. 99 of extension counter - Asha Modern School , SRE unnder NAV colony, Saharanpur.

12. Copy of attendance register for the month of Feb. 99 ofextension counter, ASHA Modern School SRE, NAV Colony, Saharanpur.

raise the industrial dispute under the provisions of the I.D. Act. It is not a case of the opposite party that the so called dispute falls under Section 2A of the I.D. Act . and in fact it could not have been the case of the opposite party of the trade union since the reference is not in connection with the termination dismissal of an employee . Despite this categorical preliminary objection the Dy. General Secretary oftradeunionhas not filed any documents on the records ofthe Tribunal to prove that the matter was at any point of time considered by the executive body of the union to raise the dispute before the appropriate authorities under the provisions of the I.D. Act , 1947. In view of the above factual position an adverse conclusion has to be drawn against the opposite party that the dispute was never validly espoused as required under the provisions of the 1.D. Act and in view ofthis the so called dispute referredto this Tribunal by the appropriate government is not industrial dispute . Trade union has failed to prove that Dy. General Secretary has any authority/power to raise the industrial dispute under the Provisions of the I.D. Act . It is further argued that in terms of regulations 13 ( 3 ) of the said constitution oftrade union is only the General Secretary of the union who can do all those acts which are necessary to promote the aims and objections of the union . The aims and objects of the union have been laid down in regulations 3 (7 ) as under ; " Shramikon ki suraksha ke liye bane kanuno ka karyanvit karane tatha arise kanuno ko banane ka prabandh karna jisse shramikon ki bhalai ho".

13. Copy of vouchers registers for the month of Jan. 99 of Extension counter, Asha Modern School , NAV. Colony, Saharanpur.

14. Copy of vouchers register for the month of Feb. 99 of extension Counter- Asha Modern School , SRE under NAV Colony, Saharanpur.

15. Copy of long book of 22-1-99 of extension Counter , Asha Modern School , SRE under NAV Colony Saharanpur.

From the constituion of trade union it is much clear before the authority under the provisions of the I.D. Act, 1947. After having being duly espoused by the executive is vested with General Secretary of the trade union accordingly the Dy. General Secretary has no authority whatsoever to raise the matter before the Asstt . Labour Commissioner(C) and have the same thereafter referred for adjudication from the appropriate Government to this Tribunal . Therefore, so called dispute raised by the trade union is without any authority and ultra virus the constitution of the Union and the same merits no consideration .

16. Copy of day book of 22-1-99 of extension counter , Asha Modern School , SRE NAV Colony. Saharanpur.

Trade union has examined Yatin Swaroup Sharma and has produced S.K. Pathak Joint Secretary for cross examination . Whereas the management has examined Sri N.J. Maan.

Although the bank management has referred in their written argument that the bank has now been able to obtain the copy of constitution of PNB Employees Union (U.P. ) but the bank management has not filed the copy of constitution to appreciate the argument advanced by and onbehalf ofthe bank management .

Parties have filed written arguments besides they have been heard at length also.

It is admitted position that the special allowance duties do not include the routine duties of the cadre (clerical/subordinate) which a workman has normally performed but similarly to those special allowance due if performed in addition to the routine duties will entitle a workman special allowance on the terms and conditions provided in chapter 5 of first Bipartite settlement as modified.

Accordingto the 4th Bipartite settlements duties of daftari involves .

The management has argued that Dy. General Secretary of the union has filed statement of claim before this Tribunal . It has been argued by the bank that dispute was never duly and validly espoused whatever has been referred to four adjudication cannot be termed as industrial dispute as envisaged under section 2 (k) of the I.D. Act 1947. Even otherwise the Dy. General Secretary of the trade union as per its constitution has no authority to 9583 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1. Simple binding of books and registers ;

1. Filing paper which is received from other agencies.

2. Press -copying ;

2. Making available files to the officers .

3. Carrying the dak to other branches.

3. Filing independently letters and other papers in respective files as per indications marked thereon;

4. Stitching of vouchers .

4. Assisting in issuing stationary;

5. Making available drinking water to the Manager. He describes the duties of peon as under;

1. Carrying dark.

5. Stacking under guidance , old records in orderly manner and assisting in giving them out when required;

2. Depositing the bill of telephone and electric.

3. Services of the bank .

6. Undertaking the whole process of sorting, arranging , numbering, tallying the total number ofand stitching the vouchers .

This is not disputed that the extension counter has sub- staff (Peon) is, and if such substaff directed to perform the duties of daftari , such sub- staff (Peon) is entitled to the special allowance for performing additional duties ofdaftari .

In the light of above it has to be seen whether or not the trade union has proved its case that the subordinate staff (Peon) has been performing the duties of daftari .

He does not say single word that he performed the duties of daftari . He admits that whatever vouchers are received at extension counter are sent to the branch office every day and those vouchers are stitched with the vouchers of the main branch were stitched by daftari . From the evidence ofYatin Swarup Sharma it is not provided that he is performing any duties prescribed for daftari as given in 4th Bipartite settlement. it is a individual Yatin Swarup Sharma for whom the dispute has been raised to prove that he carries out additional duties of daftari alongwith his routine duties . But he does not prove that.

It has been argued on behalf of the union that there is a circular No. 30/88 dated 13-5-88 issuedby the persorial division which was addressed to all Regional Managers for providing daftari allowance were the vouchers are 50 per day or above . The learned representative of the trade union has argued that this authorises the individual worker toclaim special allowance of daftari . On the other hand the management has argued that it is not for the extension counter rather it is for the new branch office .

On going through the entire circular which is on record I do not find that this circular relates to extension counter.

The order of reference does not indicate the name of sub staff (Peon) and even it does not mention category of staff for whose right the dispute has to be adjudicated upon . As already set out earlier in the beginning of the award, this has to be adjudicated whether action of the management in not sanctioning the daftary allowance to extension counter GVPS , Rampur Maniharan , Saharanpur. is just fair and justified from the bare reading of said reference it is not known as to for what category of the worker, is involved for sanctioning of daftary allowance is in dispute. Further , from the reading of the reference it is made out that it is not a individual dispute but it is a interest dispute. It is essential requirement that the union raising the dispute must be registered trade union before sponsoring the case under I.D. Act . But at the same time if there is unregistered trade union espoused the dispute then also dispute would be termed as industrial dispute. No doubt in the present case Dy. General Secretary have not been able to prove that he had authority to file statement ofclaim. It is also clear from the bare reading of the order of reference that Dy. General Secretary of the PNB Employees union was not authority. Instead it was the Vice President ofthe trade union who was authority. But only because he was not a party the dispute , the reference , can not be thrown out . It will result in miscarriage ofjustice .

The management has filed the letter of Sr. Manager IRaddressedto Chief Manager wherein the above circular has been quoted and the Chief Manager have been instructed that no additional daftari allowance may be sanctioned in extension counter as voucher and long book ofthe extension counter is included in the day book of the main branch . This makes clear that circular No. 30/88 is not applicable to the extension counter as vouchers of extension counter and long book is included in day book of the main branch and is maintained there. Copy of letter dt. 16-2-89 is on the record. the trade union has not disputed the letter dt. 16-2-89 from the H.O. of the bank . The said documents clearly states that no daftari allowance is sanctioned to extension counter as the voucher and long book of extension counter are included in the day book of the main branch. Thus , a post of daftari is not be sanctioned at those extension counters where the vouchers are not being kept seperately and where long book and day book is also not being maintained separately from the main branch.

As already stated above from bare reading of the order of reference it appears to be industrial dispute but on over all analysis of the case I come to the conclusion that this is a industrial dispute of Yatin Swarup Sharma who was sub Staff on extension counter GVPS , Rampur Maniharan , Saharanpur and who has not been sanction daftary allowance. Yatin Swarup sharma has stated on oath that he is working as peon -cum- chowkidar in Punjab National Bank . He states that dues of daftari involves:

9584

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

It is admitted fact that the incharge of extension counter recommended the payment of daftri allowance to YatinSwarup Sharma but the same was not acceptable by the management. The question whether the non- sanctioning of daftri allowance was illegal. When Yatin Swarup Sharma is not performing the duties of daftri as is provedbefore this Tribunal then . How management should sanction the allowance ? The trade union representative has tried to argue that the opposite party has been descriminated. The allegation of descrimination can be made out only when the equals have been treated unequally orwhen the unequals have been treated equally. The trade union must have proved that descrimination but it has failed to do so . The trade union has failed to show that the extension counters at which daftri has been sanctioned by the bank there the vouchers are not being stitched and no separate long book as well as day book are being maintained which is a case pertaining to extension counter atGVPS, Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur.

On the discussion above I come to the conclusion that the action of the bank management in not sanctioning the daftri allowance at extension counter , GVPS, Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur is just, fair and justified and issue istherefore answered in affirmative and I also come to the conclusion that union is not entitled to any relief.

Lucknow 11-11-04

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004 का.आ. 3176.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टैण्डर्ड चार्टर्ड ग्रींडलेज बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों केबीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 289/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं ० एल-12012/169/2002- आई.आर. ( बी- I ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004

S.O. 3176. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 289/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the managerment of Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-11-2004 .

[No. L- 12012/ 169/2002-IR (B- I) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Thursday, the 30th September, 2004

PRESENT:

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Industrial DisputeNo. 289/2004

(In the matter of dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of1947), between the Management of Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Ltd. and their workman)

BETWEEN:

Sri K. Kannan

: IParty/Petitioner

AND

II Party/Management

TheManagingDirector, Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Ltd. Chennai.

APPEARANCE :

Forthe Petitioner

: M/s . S. Ravi & N. Ramakrishnan, Advocates

For theManagement : M/ s . T.S. Gopalan & Co. Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L - 12012/ 169/2002- IR (B-I) dated 12-12-2003 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:-

"Whether the action of the management of Standard CharteredGrindlays Bank Ltd. in giving compulsory retirement to Shri K. Kannan w.e.f. 15-10-1998, seven months before his normal date of retirement based on the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer into the charges ofmisrepresentation is justified? If not, what relief the applicant is entitled?"

2. After the receipt of the reference, it was taken on file as I.D. No. 289/2004 and notices were issued to both the parties . The Petitioner entered in person and the Respondent entered appearance through their advocate. Subsequently, the Petitioner has engaged an advocate to represent him and both sides filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

The Petitioner joined the Respondent /Bank on 24-5-1961 and his date ofbirth is 11-5-1937 as per his SSLC book and Transfer Certificate. While so, the Petitioner was asked to go on compulsory retirement 9585 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

on 15-10-1998 illegally i.e. after reaching superannuation i.e. on 11-5-1997 itself. As per terminal benefits summary, it has been fraudulently mentioned and noted as 11-5-39 . The termination summary prepared is wrong and fraudulently based on illegal termination of compulsory retirement .After reaching superannuation , the Respondent/Bank is liable to pay compensation , relief, remedy and all benefits which he is entitled to under section 21 (iv) (b) ofBipartite Settlement dated 14-2-1995. By this illegal termination, the Petitioner is denied payments which are entitled for regular employee and it will come to morethan several lakhs . The first charge framed against the Petitioner was found not guilty and he was exonerated.But out of vengeance in the year 1988, the Respondent/Bank has fraudulently created a second charge and framed charge sheet against him, which was also not proved with any satisfactory evidence . So, the order passed by the Respondent /Bank compulsorily retiring the Petitioner is illegal and therefore, the Petitioner prays that an award may be passed to provide an appropriate relief to him.

declaration , his superannuation was 60 year i.e. on 11-5-99 . In the personal hearing , he has pleaded that he should be allowed to retire . Having regard to the various circumstances including his impending retirement in the normal course , orders were passed on 15-10-98 awarding the punishment of compulsory retirement . On the same day the Petitioner wrote a letter to the bank thanking them for awarding the punishment of compulsory retirement and requested the bank to settle his dues and on 28-10-98 he gave an application opting for pension as per Rule 12(4) of Pension Rules. His pension was settled as per the option exercised by him . Therefore , the compulsory retirement of the Petitioner is fully justified and valid in law. Since the Petitioner has acquiesced to the said order of compulsory retirement and availed the benefit therein , it is not permissible for him to challenge the said order of compulsory retirement. Having accepted the compulsory retirement and also received the benefits therefrom from 1998, it is no longer open to the Petitioner to agitate his compulsory retirement . Even assuming that his date of birth is 11-5-37 since he has given a declaration that his dateofbirth is 11-5-39 it would amount to misrepresentation to claim a benefit of higher period of service. Hence, for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.

4. But, as against this, the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that the Petitioner joined the services ofNational andGrindlays Bank as Clerk on 24-5-1961 . While so , the Petitioner received a letter dated 16-7-87 from one Leelaram Shevaram India Pvt . Ltd. stating the Petitioner approached them some time in March, 1985 and purchased instant coffee and few other items for the bank canteen for an amount ofRs . 1,748.80 and he issued two cheques on Vijaya Bank and subsequently, he advised them not to present the cheques for payment . On enquiry, it was found that a complaint of Leelaram Shevaram India Pvt. Ltd.was justified . In spite of the repeated advise, the Petitioner has not paid the amount and the said Leelaram Shevaram India Pvt. Ltd. was pressing the bank about the payment and it caused considerable embarrassment to the bank. On 2-8-88 a charge sheet was issued to the Petitioner calling upon him to show cause why disciplinary action should not be taken against him . As the Petitioner's explanation was not satisfactory, disciplinary enquiry was ordered and it was protracted more than a year and after the enquiry the Enquiry Officer gave his report holding that charge of misconduct against the Petitioner was duly made out and 2nd show cause notice proposing the punishment of dismissal was issued. At that stage , the Petitioner obtained an order of injunction in City Civil Court and stalled the disciplinary action and he relentlessly pursued the litigation and the bank could not pursue further disciplinary action . It was only on 8-7-97 after the SLP filed in Supreme Court was dismissed, the litigation came to an end . Subsequent to that the Petitioner was issued with several letters directing him to appear for personal hearing . On 24-2-96 the Petitioner gave a nomination for the purpose of P.F. in favour of his wife and in the said nomination, he declared his date of birth as 11-5-39 and based on this

5. Again, the Petitioner in his reply statement alleged that order dated 15-10-1998 imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement is illegal and without truth and the bank has no authority or power to pass the order dated 15-10-98 and the Respondent/Bank has no power to continue the domestic enquiry against the Petitioner beyond his date of superannuation i.e. 11-5-97 . By this impugned order, the Petitioner was denied full terminal benefits at this illegal order was the outcome ofvindictive vengeance,motivation, illful and wilful action taken by Sri Goutham Banerjee, who was in Number 2 position in ANZ Grindlays bank . Further, the enquiry was biased against the Petitioner. The Enquiry Officer was obliged by the Respondent bank and he has conducted the enquiry in unfairly, unjustifiably and with bias nature and was also one sided. Even the request for change of Enquiry Officer waswilfully refused by the Respondent/Management . The Petitioner was stood only as a guarantor and not as a borrower of the money. The said amount was also paid subsequently. The Petitioner has never misrepresented to any one that he was an officer in the Respondent/Bank and therefore, the charge framed against the Petitioner is not valid. Further, the transaction was purely a private transaction , which is in no way affecting the prestige or the affairs ofthe bank causing considerable embarrassment to the bank as stated by the Respondent/Bank. Therefore , the order of dismissal as proposed in the 2nd show cause notice only proves the malafide of the Respondent/Bank and victimisation. It is false to allege that the Respondent/ Bank has given letters for personal enquiry . It is only the Petitioner who has sent severast letters to the Respondent/ 353091104-39 9586

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Bank asking about the verdit of the final enquiry. It is only on the personal enquiry of the Petitioner, verdict of the final enquiry was made while Mr. N.K. Srinivasan , General Manager, Staff Welfare has asked me to come on 15-10-98 and on that date the Petitioner was asked to go on compulsory retirement , although he reached superannuation on 11-5-1997 itself. The application for a loan towards P.F. filled by one Mr. U.C. Krishnaswamy, staff of the Respondent/Bank who was in salary department signed as a witness and he has only filled up the date of birth in that application as 11-5-1939 . When the Petitioner was very much hard pressed for money at the time of filling the loan application by over sight he has not noticed the same . Therefore, the Petitioner prays an award may be passed in his favour.

6. In these circumstances the points for my consideration are

(i) "Whether the action of the Respondent/Bank in giving compulsory retirement to the Petitioner w.e.f. 15-10-1998 seven months before his normal date of retirement based on the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer on the charge of misrepresentation is justified ?"

(ii) "To what relief, the Petitioner is entitled?"

Point No. 1 :-

Ex. W4. Ex. W5 is the copy of the Transfer Certificate issued by Presidency College . Ex. W6 is the copy of the certificate given by his father with regard to his date of birth. Ex. W7 is the copy of first page of his SSLC book. After his acceptance for the post , the Grindlays Bank has compared the original and made an endorsement and the copy of the said endorsement is Ex. W8 . The Petitioner has produced all those documents to show that his real date of birth is only 11-5-1937 and the bank has also accepted the same through their records. In the evidence , the Petitioner has not questioned the conduct of the domestic enquiry or the findings of the domestic enquiry, on the other hand, his oral evidence is with regard to allegations that his real date ofbirth is 11-5-1937 and not 11-5-1939 and therefore , the order passed by the Respondent/Bank compulsorily retiring him from service is illegal after his superannuation . He further contended that the Respondent/Bank in its Counter Statement has stated that he has given a declaration in the loan application for the provident fund in which he has stated his date of birth as 11-5-1939 and basing on this , the Respondent/ Bank has taken against him and compulsorily retired him on 15-10-1998 . But, he alleged that this application was even through given by him to the bank , the column mentioned about date ofbirth was filled up by one Mr. U.C. Krishnaswamy, the staff of the Respondent/Bank and he has requested him to fill up the date ofbirth from the office records, but even though this fact that he mentioned wrong date of birth was known to him three months after the application, he has not informed the same to the bank for any reason.

7. In this case , the case of the Petitioner before the Ministry is that he has been compulsorily retired on 15-10-1998 i.e. seven months before the normal date of retirement based on the findings of the Enquiry Officer into the charges of misrepresentation and the reference was made by the Ministry on that ground but in the Claim Statement, the Petitioner alleged that his date of birth is 11-5-1937 and he had reached the age of superannuation on 11-5-1997 and after 11-5-97 the bank had no authority to proceed with disciplinary action and therefore , the order ofcompulsory retirement on 15-10-98 is illegal .

8. But, again in the rejoinder statement , he alleged elaborately with regard to the alleged biased nature ofthe Enquiry Officer and the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority and he further stated that the Ministry has wrongly mentioned in the schedule as misappropriation and it is only misrepresentation and even assuming that the schedule mentioned is a wrong one , he argued that neither he misappropriated the amount nor misrepresented any facts to anybody else and therefore , the punishment awarded to him is illegal and therefore , he is entitled to receive all the benefits as that of a regular employee on his superannuation. Thus , the Petitioner has taken a different stand in different times . In this case , he examined himself as WW1 and marked Ex. W1 to W16 . Ex . W1 is the xerox copy of the application given by the Petitioner to the Respondent/Bank for a job on 17-4-61 . Ex . W2 is the acceptance of Petitioner with regard to appointment order dated 24-5-1961 . He produced a copy of medical certificate issued on 20-5-1961 , which is marked as Ex . W3 and he has produced a copy of acceptance letter which is marked as

9. Onthe other hand, it is contended on behalf of the Respondent that compulsory retirement of the Petitioner was fully justified and valid in law. On 2-8-88 , a charge sheet was issued to the Petitioner making reference to the complaint by Leelaram Shevaram India Pvt . Ltd. and calling upon him to show cause why disciplinary action should not be taken against him. Even though the Petitioner has given an explanation to that charge sheet , since it was not satisfactory, he was asked to appear for an enquiry. Though the Petitioner has participated in the enquiry and though theEnquiry Officer has given à finding while serving 2nd show cause notice proposing the punishment of dismissal , the Petitiorner obtained an order of interim injunction from City Civil Court and stalled the disciplinary proceedings and he relenlessly pursued the litigation and thereby the bank could not pursue the disciplinary action . The matter was pending till his SLP was dismissed by the Supreme Court and it was only on 8-7-1997 after the SLP filed by the Petitioner in the Supreme Court was dismissed, the litigation initiatedby the Petitioner came to an end . Thereafter several letters were issued to the Petitioner directing him to appear before the disciplinary authority for personal hearing but he has in one way or the other prolonging the matter . Subsequently, he has given a representation that he may be allowed to retire . Though the Respondent/Bank 9587 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

11-5-1937. Even though the bank has made a mistake without looking into the records ofthe Petitioner and relying on the declaration given by the Petitioner during P.F. nomination in this case , the Petitioner even after his real superannuation dated 11-5-97 has received the full salary namely the subsistence allowance and he has also received the retirement benefits till 15-10-1998 and now he is questioning the order passed by the authorities , which is not valid on the ground that this order was passed after his date of superannuation . I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent that he has acquiesced to the said order of compulsory retirement and availed the benefit and therefore , it is not permissible for him to challenge the order of compulsory retirement .

11. But, again the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that the Petitioner is questioning the findings of theEnquiry Officer itself and the charge framed against the Petitioner is that he has misrepresented to the company that he was an officer of the Respondent/Bank and he has purchased certain goods from the company. But , on the other hand, it was not proved before the domestic enquiry and since the charge framed against the Petitioner is not valid and since it was not proved before the domestic enquiry, the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority is not valid and it is illegal and therefore, the Petitioner is entitled to the relief claimed by him .

proposed the punishment of dismissal in the 2nd show cause notice , they have regarded to the various circumstances including his impending retirement in the normal course i.e. on 11-5-1999 and an order was passed on 15-10-1998 . Further, on 24-2-1996 the Petitioner gave a nomination papers for the purpose ofP.F. in favour of his wife and in that nomination, he declared his date ofbirth as 11-5-39 and therefore , basing on the declaration, the Respondent/Bank awarded the punishment of compulsory retirement on 15-10-98 and on the same day, the Petitioner wrote a letter to the bank thanking them for awarding the punishment of compulsory retirement and requested the bank to settle his dues and on 28-10-98 the Petitioner gave an application opting for pension as per Rule 12(4 ) of Pension Rules and he has received all the retirement benefits and also pension. Under such circumstances , having accepted the compulsory retirement and also received the benefits therefrom from 1998 , it is no longer open to the Petitioner to agitate his compulsory retirement. Further, he has given a letter even on 15-10-1998 itself that he has accepted the order passed against him and asked the bank to settle his dues as per the order. Under such circumstances , he cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time namely accepting the punishment given by the Respondent/Bank and also questioning the same through this forum. Further, the learned counsel for the filed Ex. M1 to M5 namely copy of the charge sheet issued to the Petitioner on 2-8-88 Ex. Ml and copy of the report of the EnquiryOfficer dated 24-12-1990 as Ex . M3 and copy of the P.F. nomination submitted by the Petitioner as Ex . M2 and a copy ofthe order of the Supreme Court in SLP Civil No. 10517/97 as Ex.M4 and also a copy of the letter from the Petitioner accepting the order ofcompulsory retirement as Ex. M5 and he vehemently argued that though the Petitioner has taken different stand at different times , since hehas accepted the retirement and he received his retirement benefits , now he cannot question the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority. Further , for argument sake , if his date ofbirth is different from one which he has declared in his nomination given in February, 1996 , then it would amount to misrepresentation to claim a benefit of higher period of service and on that score also , the contention of the Petitioner should not be countenanced.

12. I find there is no substance in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner because as I have already stated that the Petitioner has taken different stand before different forums namely before the reference was sent by the Ministry, it was his claim that he has been compulsorily retired seven months prior to his normal retirement , but in the claim statement, he has stated that he has been compulsorily retired after his superannuation which is illegal and the Respondent has no power to pass such an order. But, again in the rejoinder statement, he has alleged that the enquiry itself is not valid and the findings of the Enquiry Officer is not valid and the compulsory retirement is not sustainable. But, from the records , I come to a conclusion that the Petitioner after giving consent letter under the original ofEx.M5 and after receiving the retirement benefits and also pensionary benefits , he has taken a stand that the order passedby the Respondent/Bank is not valid in law. Further, hiscounsel has contended that after 15-10-1998 he has issued notice stating that the original of Ex. M5 was obtained by coercion andundue influence and therefore, no reliance can be placed on Ex. M5 and since the enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer and the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority is null and void, the Petitioner is entitled to all the benefits ofnormal retirement and therefore , and award may be passed in his favour.

13.But, I find there is no substance in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner because even though the Petitioner alleged to have issued a notice that the letter under Ex . M5 was obtained by coercion , but this letter was written by him only on 28-11-98 and he has 10. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent because in the cross examination, the Petitioner has admitted that in the original ofEx. M2 except the date ofbirth it was filled up by himand the column ofdate ofbirth was written in a different ink. It was filled up by one Mr. U.C. Krishnaswamy, the staff of Madras Office and the Petitioner has asked him to fill up this column from the official records and though he knew this fact that awrong date ofbirth was mentioned in Ex. M2 after three months , he has not written any letter to the bank that in the declaration given by him only Mr. U.C. Krishnaswamy has mentioned the wrong date ofbirth and he has not spell out that the correct date of birth was only 9588

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

issued to Petitioner

not taken any steps immediately i.e. after 15-10-98 and he has not given any reason for not taking immediate action .

W3 20-05-61 Xerox copy ofthe medical certificate ofPetitioner

24-05-61

W4 Xeroxcopyofthe letter fromPetitioner to Respondent

W5 04-06-59 Xerox copy of the transfer certificate ofPetitioner

W6 06-03-54 Xerox copy of the certificate of correctness ofdate ofbirth in respect ofPetitioner

29-04-53

W7 Xerox copy of the SSLC book of Petitioner

W8 29-04-53 Xerox copy of the SSLC book of Petitioner with endorsement of Respondent/Management

W9 21-11-98 Xerox copyofthe letter from Petitioner to Respondent

Nil W10

Xerox copy of the terminal benefits summary

W11 7-03-02

Therefore , I find only to wriggle out the situation , the Petitioner has taken the stand that this letter was obtained by coercion and undue influence . In this case , the Petitioner has received all his pensionary benefits and also has given a letter on 15-10-98 opting for pension as per Rule 12 (4 ) of Pension Rules and he has received the pension dues as per the option exercised by him. Only after receiving all the benefits , he has issued the denial letter. Therefore, I find there is not substance in the contention of the Petitioner thatthe original ofEx. M5 letter was obtained by coercion. If really, it was obtained by coercion , there is nothing to prevent the Petitioner from disputing the said document immediately but he has kept quite for a very long time and now he has taken a stand that it was obtained by coercion. As I have already stated that the Petitioner cannot approbate or reprobate at the same time with regard to this document . Further, he has admitted in cross examination that his case was pending in Supreme Court till 8-7-97 and he further stated that if he is retired on 11-5-97 he will be getting only lesser than the amount now he is getting in 1998 and he has categorically stated that there is no monetary loss to him by compulsory retiring him from service in the year 1998. Under such circumstances , I find this point against the Petitioner .

Point No. 2 :

Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent/Management to Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)

W12 24-05-04

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled?

Xerox copy of the survival certificate &declaration submitted By Petitioner

W13 1-10-01 Xerox copy of the application for withdrawal of approval application

W14 15-10-98 Xerox copy of the order of compulsory retirement issued to Petitioner

W15

14. In view of my findings that the Petitioner has taken different stand in different times and also in view of my finding that after receiving all his pensionary benefits and retirement benefits , the Petitioner now wants to challenge the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority which is not valid , I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any reliefas claimed by him. No Costs.

28-10-98 Xerox copy of the option confirmation and terminal benefits summary 15. Thus the reference is answered accordingly.

W16 Nil

Xerox copy of the pension and commuted pension papers .

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected andpronounced by me in the open court on this day the 30th September, 2004. )

For the II Party/Management :-

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Ex. No. Date

Description

Witnesses Examined : --

02-08-88

For the I Party/Workman :

M1 Xerox copy ofthe charge sheet issued to Petitioner

WW1 Sri K. Kannan

24-02-96

None

Forthe Il Party/Management

Documents Marked :-

M2 Xerox copy of the provident fund nomination submitted by Petitioner

Nil

For the 1 Party/Workman:

Xerox copy of the enquiry report

M4 08-07-97

Ex. No. Date

Description

Xerox copy of the order of Supreme Court in SLP No. 10527/97 W1 17-04-61

M5 15-10-98

Xerox copy of the application submitted by the Petitioner for job

W2 24-05-61 xerox copy of the appointment order

Xeroxcopy ofthe letter from Petitioner toRespondent/Management Accept- ing the compulsory retirement.

9589 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

of the Industrial disputes Act , 1947 , has referred said dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

3.After the receipt of order, notices in appropriate form were issued to the second party and first party to put forththeir statement of claim and writter statement .

का. आ. 3177.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पूणे के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 44/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को20-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 12011/163/2001- आई.आर. ( बी. II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 29th November, 2004

S.O. 3177. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 44/2001) ofthe Industrial Tribunal Pune (Maharashtra) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , received by the Central Government on 20-11-2004.

[No. L- 12011/ 163/2001 -IR (B- II)]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI V. G. INDRALE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL MAHARASHTRA AT PUNE .

REFERENCE (IT) NO. 44 OF 2001

ADJUDICATION

BETWEEN:

Syndicate Bank, Mumbai

AND

4. In response to the notice , the second partyunion appeared and filed statement of claim at Ex. U- 2. According to the second party union, Smt. Sushila H. Salvi was serving as Clerk -Typist in Rasta Peth Branch of First party Bank during the period from 1-8-1990 to 24-9-1998. On 22-10-1999 , charge- sheet was issued to her in respect of misconduct regarding misappropriation of amount of Rs. 445/-deposited by customer on 16-3-1996 . On that basis , domestic enquiry was held and the Enquiry Officer gave finding that the misconduct as alleged is proved. Against the said finding, the delinquent has preferred appeal before the appropriate authority who has dismissed the appeal . It is the grievance ofthe second party that the enquirywas not fair and from the evidence on record, it is not established that misconduct is proved. It is the contention of the second party that there is no direct evidence to hold that Smt . Sushila Salvi received cash amount of Rs . 445/- from the customer on 16-3-1996 . It is further contended that there is delay in submitting the report by customer in respect of not taking entry of Rs. 445/- in pass book . The Enquiry Officer has not sent the counter foil dated 16-3-1996 to handwriting expert to know that it bears the signature of the delinquent . Thus , according to the second party, the Enquiry Officer is biased and his findings are perverse. For all these grounds , the second party has prayed to set aside the order of disciplinary authority awarding punishment of compulsory retirement and to reinstate the delinquent with back -wages with 18% interest.

Syndicate Bank Emplolyees ' Union on behalf of Smt .

Sushila H. Salvi.

In the matter of termination of services by way of compulsory retirement.

APPEARANCES :

Shri R.M. Nijampurkar for First Party. Shri V.N. Mehendale for Second Party.

AWARD

(Dated: 19-10-2004)

The second party-Syndicate Bank Employees ' union, made grievance before the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi , in respect of action of the management of Syndicate Bank in terminating the service of Smt. Sushila H. Salvi , by way ofcompulsory retirement on the basis of finding arrived at by Enquiry Officer that the misconduct levelled against her vide charge- sheet dt. 22-10-1999 is proved.

5. The first party appeared and filled its written statement at Ex . C-8 . According to the first party, the Enquiry Officer had given full opportunity to the second party to defend the enquiry and on the basis of evidence led before him, has rightly arrived at conclusion that the misconduct is proved and the delinquent has misappropriated amount of Rs . 445/- deposited by customer on 16-3-1996 . The alleged misconduct on the party of the second party employee comes under Clause 19.5(j ) of the Bipartite Settlement . The second party has not made any grievance before the Enquiry Officer to send the said disputed counter foil to handwriting expert and on the comparison of signatures thereon with admitted counter-foils has righlty held that the said counter foil dated 16-3-1996 bears the signature ofthe delinquent . The charge ofmisconduct levelled against the delinquent was serious one and therefore , the disciplinary authority after considering the report of the Enquiry Officer has rightly awarded the punishment of compulsory retirement from service with immediate effect . The first party has examined three witnesses before the Enquiry Officer as well as the second party union examined Smt . Salvi as defence witness . After considering all the evidence on record and documents , the Enqsuiry Officer has rightly held that the 2. It reveals that the dispute was put before the conciliation, where no fruitful purpose could be served. So , the Govt . of India by invoking powers under clause (d) of Sub-seciton ( 1 ) and Sub- seciton (2A) of Section 10 9590

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 20, 1926

misconduct is proved. There is no infirmity in the finding given by the Enquiry Officer and the same is based on legal footing and evidence on record. It is the contention ofthe first party that the business of the bank is custodian of the amount deposited by customers and if said amount is misappropriated by the employees , then, it is a serious misconduct on the part of the employee and therefore, the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority is just and proper . There was no reason for the customer to file complaint in respect of the amount not credited in his passbook . For all these grounds , the first party has prayed to reject the reference.

6. On the above pleadings of the parties , following issues are framed at Ex. 0-6 and I have recorded my findings thereon, as to reasons to follow:

Yes (already decided vide order, dt. 9-10-2003) 1. Whether enquiry conducted against Party No. 2 is fair, proper and as per principles of natural justice ?

-No .

2. Whether findings of the EnquiryOfficer are perverse?

-Yes .

3. Whether misconduct of Party No. 2 alleged in charge-sheet is proved by evidence in enquiry proceeding?

-Yes .

4. If so, whether order of compulsory retirement of Party No. 2 is legal and justified?

5. If so, what order?

-As per order.

REASONS

7. Issue No. 1 : I have gone through the record and this issue which is in respect , as to whether the enquiry conducted against Party No. 2 is fair, proper and as per principles of natural justice, has been treated as preliminary issue. The parties have led evidence on the said issue and after hearing both the parties , my learned Predecessor has answered the said issue in the affirmative .

8. Issue Nos. 2 & 3 : In view of finding on Issue No. 1 , now, 1 have to see from the evidence on record as well as evidence led before the Enquiry Officer that the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer are preverse or not as well as to see whether the alleged misconduct in charge - sheet is proved by evidence. The Second party union has examined Sushila H - Salvi at Ex. UW- 1 who is member of the second party union . The second party also examined Smt . Sushila H. Salvi by way of affidavit and the same is at Ex. U-28 . The first partyhas examined Bandaru V. Vekatadry at Ex . CW-1 on 12-8-2003 and closed evidence . After finding on preliminary issue , the first party has not led any evidence and closed evidence vide purshis , Ex. C-26. Both the parties have placed on record enquiry papers and findings given by the Enquiry Officer . The second party has placed on record Bipartite settlement and the same is at Ex . U-31 . The second party has placed on record notes of arguments atEx. U-36 and the first party has placed on record notes ofarguments at Ex . C-28 . I have carefully gone through

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] the notes of arguments of first party and second party and scanned the evidence led before the Enquiry Officer.

9. In the written arguments , the second party has made a grievance that as per para . 19.14 of the Bipartite Settlement, the Chairman & Managing Director of the Bank has only authority to take disciplinary action against the workmen/ employees . According to the second party, two different Disciplinary Authority in the departmental enquiry conducted against the delinquent and therefore, the findings are perverse . On this point , I have gone through Clause 19.14 ofthe said Bipartite Agreement which runs as under :

"The Chief Executive Officer or the principal officer in India of a bank or an alternative officer at the HeadOffice or principal office nominated by him for the purpose shall decide which officer ( i.e. the Disciplinary Authority) shall be empowered to take disciplinary action in the case of each office or establishment . He shall also decide which officer or body higher in status than the officer authorised to take disciplinary action shall act as the appellate authority to deal with or hear and dispose of any appeal against orders passed in disciplinary matters. These authorities shall be nominated by designation, to pass original orders or hear and dispose of appeals from time to time and a notice specifying the authorities so nominated shall be published from time to time on the bank's office board.

It isclarified that the disciplinary authority may conduct the enquiry himself or appoint another officer as the Enquiry Officer for the purpose of conducting an enquiry.

The appellate authority shall, if the employee concerned is so desirous , in a case of dismissal , hear him or his representatives before disposing of the appeal . In cases where hearings are not required , an appeal shall be disposed of within two months from the date of receipt thereof. In cases where hearings are required to be given and requested for, such hearings shall commence within one month from the date of receipt of the appeal and shall be disposed of within one month from the date of conclusion of such hearings . The period within which an appeal can be preferred shall be 45 days from the date on which the original order has been communicated in writing to the employee concerned."

10. I have gone through the record and it appears that on 22-10-1999 , Dy. General Manager of Syndicate Bank issued charge- sheet to the delinquent. As per Clause 19.14 ofthe Bipartite agreement , the Chief Executive Officer or the principal officer in India of a bank or an alternative officeratthe Head Office or principal office nominated by him for the purpose shall decide which officer i.e. the Disciplinary Authority shall be empowered to take disciplinary action in the case of each office or establishment. Considering these terms and conditions , it cannot be held that the charge- sheet issued to the 9591 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 11 , 2004/अग्रहायण 20, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

delinquent is not by Disciplinary Authority who has right to initiate enquiry. So , considering the record Ex. U -8, Ex. U-9, i.e. letter dtd. 14-12-1999 issued to the delinquent , coupledwith clasue 19.14 ofthe Bipartite Agreement, I do not find any substance in the contention of the second party that the enquiry was initiated by the person who has no authority to initiate it .

11. It is further submitted that the Bank has not filed any circular to show that the Disciplinary Authority was changed from Dy. General Manager to Asstt . General Manager, as well as from 22-10-1999 to 26-5-2000 Dy. General Manager was the Disciplinary Authority, then how Asstt . Gen. Manager appointed Presenting Officer and Enquiry Officer by letter dated 14-12-1999 and therefore, the finding is perverse and the management wanted to book the delinquent and punish her by awarding capital punishment of dismissal from the Bank. I am unable to accept this contention, as nothing has been brought on recordby the second party to show that she has done such acts representing the employees in the capacity of office bearer of the union and thereby the bank authority has inclined to book her in the enquiry. From mere circumstance that the delinquent was member of the second party union itself is not sufficient to prove that with malafide intention and with a view to victimise the delinquent, the Bank has initiated departmental enquiry.

13. In the notes of argument, the second party has contended that the Enquiry Officer has not sent the alleged counter foil dated 16-3-1996 to Handwriting Expert and thereby prejudice is caused to the delinquent ; so , the findings are perverse . I am unable to accept this submission only on the ground that the delinquent had every right to move an application before the Enquiry Officer in that regard or to make such request in her defence and the same has not been done by the delinquent. Therefore, only on that ground , it could not be held that the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer are perverse . On the contrary, after going through the evidence of the delinquent led before the Enquiry Officer in defence , it apears that she admits that on 16-3-1996 , she was acting as Cashier , i.e. receiving the cash and used to sign on the counter foil in red ink as well as in blue ink. It appears that the Enquiry Officer has tallied the signature on counter foil dated 16-3-1996 with admitted signatures of the delinquent on counter foils dated 16-3-1996 and came to the conclusion that it bears the signature of the delinquent . Best reasons known to the delinquent as to why she did not dare to file application before the Enquiry Officer with bold defence to send the counter foil toHandwriting Expert . Likewise, she did not make out a case before the Enquiry Officer that with some malice intention or with planned motive, the management was inclined to book her in the enquiry. No such case is made out by the delinquent before the Enquiry Officer . then, at least at the time of argument, such contention cannot be accepted .

14. In the written notes of arguments , it has been submitted that with biased mind , the enquiry was concluded. I find no ground to hold that the enquiry was initiated with biased and with ill motive . On the contrary, it appears that after the receipt of application from the customer, the higher authorities made enquiry, called original counter foil from the customer and then issued the charge-sheet . For that , some time was required. So, it could not be held that there is delay in filing charge -sheet. It is come in the evidence of the delinquent as well as evidence of witnesses of management that the seal on counter foil is with the cashier. The said counter- foil dated 16-3-1996 bears the stamp and seal of the bank, and therefore, in any case, it could not be held that it is fabricated document as the customer has no reason to file afalse complaint that the bank has not credited amount of Rs . 445/- in his account although he has deposited it on 16-3-1996.

15. Shri Mehendale , learned Counsel for the second party has submitted that the Enquiry Officer should give reasons for the conclusion and as to why he preferred management evidence to that of the delinquent employee's and the termination order based on the report contending conclusions without reasons , is unsustainable . On this point, he reliedupon the ruling reported in 1985 I L. L. J. P. 101-Supreme Court-Anil Kumar v/s . Presiding Officer and others . I have gone throuth the report of the Enquiry Officer and it appears that he shas given sound reasons 12. The next limb of argument of second party is that the charge-sheet was issued on 22-10-1999; the complaint was received from Electra Sales on 25-8-1998 and the original counter foil was submitted by-the complainant on 15-4-1999. All these circumstances regarding delay lead to hold that false enquiry was initiated against the delinquent. I have gone through the evidence onrecord i.e. evidence ofMW- 3 Mr. M.F. Nazir , who has reasonably explained about the delay of 21/2 years in bringing the matter to the knowledge of the bank . He has stated that his father was initially looking after the business anddue to ill health, he was enable to look after the same and after the death of his father, he himself looked after the business and when the passbook was sent to C.A. at that time, it was noticed that the amount of Rs . 445/- deposited on 16-3-1996 was not credited in the account. He has no reason to depose against the delinquent and to favour the management . It is submitted that as per the terms and conditions in the passbook, customer is required to get tallied the entries in the passbook with bank record for every month and that has not been done by the customer and therefore , it is fatal. It is true that such term is embodied in the passbook but that does not mean that the customer is precluded from bringing to the notice of bank regarding the entries not made in the passbook for the amount deposited by him with the bank . In general practice, no customer is expected to get verified the enteries in the passbook with the ledger maintained by the bank. So, in my opinion, the delay in issuing the charge- sheet was reasonably explained by the management , and this circumstance could not be looked with suspicion.

9592

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 11 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 20 , 1926

as to why he has accepted the evidence of management witnesses and therefore, the ratio laid down in the said case law is not at all applicable.

16. Shri Mehendale has further relied upon the ruling reported in ( 1987) 4 administrative Tribunals Cases 716- J.P. Sharma v/s . Union of India and others . In this case , it has been held that if without discussing evidence , enquiry officer holding charges as proved , then , findings in the report held invalid. Such is not the case in the case before me and therefore, the ratio laid down in the said case law is not applicable.

17. I have gone through the enquiry report in which the EnquiryOfficer has discussed all the details for arriving at conclusion as to how the misconduct is proved . He has framed the issues and discussed the evidence of each witness of management as well as defence witnesses of delinquent and arrived at conclusion that the misconduct is proved. Thus , I do not find any infirmity in the findings recordedby the Enquiry Officer as the same are based on evidence placed before him.

18. Shri Nijampurkar, learned Counsel for the first party has submitted that the Enquiry Officer has rightly considered all the evidence on record and documents and held that the misconduct is proved . He has further submitted that the bank is custodian of the amount deposited by the customers and if the bank employees are misappropriating the said amount, then, it is a grave misconduct on the part of the employee and therefore , in any case , it could not be held that the punishment imposed by the first party is shockingly disproportionate . He has further submitted that the delinquent herself admits that on 16-3-1996 she was receiving the cash as well as admits her signature on the counter foif of other transactions for which she received the amount . He has relied upon the ruling reported in 1994 (2) Kar . L. J.-425 Bank of India, Regional Office, Bangalore v/s . D. Padmanabhudu and another . I have gone through the ratio laid down in the said case law in which it has been held that when act of misappropriation by bank employee has been proved by overwhelming evidence and admissions , the interest of an individual cannot over ride or be compromised and the Court should not lightly consider the same and grant the relief of reinstatement . The Hon'ble High Court has set aside the Award passed by the Industrial Tribunal and confirmed the order of dismissal . I have gone through the facts of the case law and the same are identical with the facts of the case before me and therefore , the ratio laid down, in the said case law is applicable to the instant case .

19. He has further relied upon the ruling in the case ofV. Kasi v/s . Pandian Roadways Corporation Ltd. Madurai and another in W.A. No. 373/2001 , C.M.P. Nos . 2830 and 14088/2001 , (2003 II L.L.J. p . 986) decided by Madras High Court. In this case law, it has been held that in case of misappropriation of amount by employees , the Court or Tribunal should not show any sympathy. Thus , the ratio

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] laid down in the said case law is applicable to the case at myhand.

20. Having regard to the above-said reasons and considering the evidence led by management before the Enquiry Officer, it appears that the findings given by the EnquiryOfficer are legal and proper. Here, I would think it just and proper to reproduce the answer given by MW- 3 M.F. Nazir to question put to him in re-examination . In re- examination it was asked to him as to whether he remembered as to who has deposited the amount in the Bank on 16-3-1996. He answered said question as under :

"The question put to me did not mention anything about the hand writing . As such , I misunderstood the question put to me . As far as the reply to Q. No. 5 is concerned, it was assumed by me that the same question was being put to me again as there was interludge between 2 questions of light talk. I have no interest to give evidence on behalf of anyone as I am not a paid employee . I just want justice since I am a/c . holder for this bank for the past 12 yrs . and I am maintaining good balance and if this can happen to me it can happen to anybody. In the interest of justice whatever is true to come out and no hair splitting is allowed by twisting some words and its meaning . I am not acting on behalf of anybody. " This answer given by MW- 3 Nazir itself speaks that he has no reason to file application that the amount of Rs . 445/- was not credited in his account . So, I answer Issue No. 2 in the negative and Issue No. 3 in the affirmative.

21. Issue No. 4 : In view of findings on Issues 1 to 3, it can be very well held that the order of compulsory retirement of the second party employee is legal and justified. So, I answer Issue No. 4 accordingly.

22. For the above - stated reasons and after going through the evidence led before the Enquiry, Officer, it is proved that the delinquent has committed misappropriation of amount of Rs. 445/- depositedby customer on 16-3-1996 . Here , I would like to mention that if the amount is paid by customer on that day, it is not shown in the record i.e. the ledger book maintained by bank, then , certainly, said amount must be credited to some tree account . It is not the defence of the second party that on that day, said amount was reflected in the said account . Ali these circumstances very well go to show that the Enquiry Officer has considered all the aspects and evidence on record and rightiy held that the misconduct as alleged in the charge- sheet is duly proved. Thus , the reference is required to be answered in the negative . In result , I pass the following order:

ORDER

1. Reference is answered in the negative .

2. Award be drawn accordingly.

3. In the circumstances , no order as to costs .

VG. INDRALE, Industrial Tribunal .

Date: 19-10-2004 .

Printedby the Manager , Govt . of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.