This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

राजस्ट्री सं० डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/ 2003-05

REGD. No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 51 ]

नई दिल्ली, दिसम्बर 12 दिसम्बर18 , 2004, शनिवार/अग्रहायण, 21-अग्रहायण 27, 1926

No. 51 | NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 12-DECEMBER 18, 2004, SATURDAY/ AGRAHAYANA, 21 - AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप- खण्ड ( ii ) PART II Section 3-Sub- section( ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्थ विभाग )

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम्बर, 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 3178.-सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम केसामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है-

( 1 ) अधिसूचित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा- बहियों का रख- रखाव करेगा ।

(2) अधिसूचित संगठन प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गतिविधियों को वार्षिक विवरणी प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 मई 3606 Gl / 2004

(9593)

को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव, वैज्ञानिक औ श्रौधोगिक अनुसंधान विभाग, ' टेक्नोलॉजी भवन', न्यू महरोली रोड, नई दिल्ली-110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(3) अधिसूचित संगठन केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोदिद्दष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों , जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले: ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक (छूट) आयकर भवन, नवीं व दसवीं मंजिल , सैक्टर-3 वैशाली गाजियाबाद , ( ख ) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक आधान विभाग तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगा । 9594

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम

क्रम सं.

अवधिजिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है

1-4-2002 से 1.

31-3-2005 धर्मशिला कैंसर फांउडेशन एण्डरिसर्च सेंटर, वसुंधरा इन्कलेव , नई दिल्ली

टिप्पणी: अधिसूचित संगठन को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को भी सीधे भेजी जानी चाहिए ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 293/2004/फा.सं . 203/ 116/ 2003- आ.क. नि.- II ]

निधिसिंह, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

( CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ) New Delhi , the 8th December , 2004

(INCOME TAX)

S.O. 3178. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization mentioned below has been approved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below . for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income Tax Rules , 1962 under the category Institution subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The notified organization shall maintain separate books of accounts for its research activities :

(ii) The notified organisation shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary. Department of Scientific & Industrial Research. Technology Bhawan' . New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi - 110016 for every financial year on or before 31st May of each year:

(iii ) The notified organization shall submit , on behalf of the Central Government , to ( a ) the Director General of Income Tax ( Exemption ) , Aayakar Bhawan, 9th & 10th Floor . Sector 3. Vaishali , Ghaziabad , (b ) The Sccrciary . Department of Scientific & Industrial Research . and ( c ) the Commissisoner of Income Tax/Director of Income Tax ( Exemptions ) having jurisdiction over the organization , on or before the 31st October each year , a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income Tax Act , 1961 in addition to the return of income-tax to the designated assessing officer.

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

Period for which notifi- cation is effective S. No. Name of the organis- ationapproved

1-4-2002 to 31-3-2005 1. Dharamshila Cancer Foundation & Research Centre, Vasundhra Enclave, New Delhi

Note : The notified organization is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval, to the Central Government through theCommissioner ofIncome-tax/Director ofincome- tax (Exemption) having jurisdiction . Three copies ofthe application for renewal of approvalshould also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

[Notification No. 293 /2004/F. No. 203/ 116 /2003 - ITA- II ] NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy.

( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग )

(बैंकिंग प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3179.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक, ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा श्री अशोक गुप्ता, विशेष सहायक, इंडियन बैंक को 9-12-2004 से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए और उसके बाद उनके उत्तराधिकारी की नियुक्ति होने तक या इंडियन बैंक के कर्मकार कर्मचारी के रूप में उनकी सेवाएं समाप्त होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , इंडियन बैंक के निदेशक बोर्ड में कर्मकार कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्तकरती है ।

[फा. सं ० 15/ 1 /2000- आई . आर ] ए. थामस , अवर सचिव (Department of Economic Affairs ) (Banking Division)

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2004 S. O. 3179. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) of the Sub - section 3 of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 1970 read with Sub- clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970 , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ashok Gupta , Special Assistant, Indian Bank as Workmen Employee Director on the Board of Directors of Indian Bank for a period of three years with effect front 9th December , 2004 and thereafter until his successor is appointed or till he ceases to be a workman employee of Indian Bank, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 15/ 1 /2000- IR] A. THOMAS , Under Secy .

9595 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004

नई दिल्ली, 6 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3180.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतद्‌द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 और 15 ( 1 ) के उपबंध इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से पांच वर्ष तक इलाहाबाद बैंक पर लागू नहींहोंगे ।

[फा० सं० 11/34/2004- बीओए ]

राम मुईवा, निदेशक

New Dellu , the 6th December , 2004

का. आ. 3182. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) योजना, 1970 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( I ) , खंड 5 , खंड 6 , खंड 7 और खंड 8 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी (उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्‌द्वारा भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात, श्री वी. श्रीधर, अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबन्ध निदेशक , राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक को उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 31-07-2007 तक या अगला आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो, यूको बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा.सं० 9/31/2004-वी. ओ. I ( ii ) ]

रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2004 S. O. 3180.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949 ) the Central Government , on the recommendation of Reserve Bank of India , hereby declares that the provisions of Section 13 and 15 ( 1 ) of the said Act shall not apply, for a period of five years from the date of this Notification to Allahabad Bank.

[F. No. 11/34/2004-BOA]

RAM MUIVAH , Director

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004

S. O. 3182. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of Sub - section (3 ) of Section 9 ofthe Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with Sub -clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3 , Clause 5, Clause 6, Clause 7 and Sub -clause ( 1 ) of Clause 8 ofthe Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970 , the Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby appoints Shri V. Sridar, Chairman and Managing Director, National Housing Bank as Chairman and Managing Director, UCO Bank for the period from the date ofhis taking charge and upto 31-07-2007 or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 9/31/2004-BO- 1 (ii)]

RAMESH CHAND, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3181.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक, ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) योजना, 1970 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( I ) , खंड 5 , खंड 6 , खंड 7 और खंड 8 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात, श्री के. चेरिएन वर्गीस, अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबन्ध निदेशक, कारपोरेशन बैंक को उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 31-3-2006 तक या अगला आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , यूनियन बैंक आफ इंडिया के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं० 9/31 /2004- बी. ओ. - 1 ( i ) ]

रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव

New Delhi . the 9th December , 2004

S. O. 3181.-In exercise of the powers conferred

का. आ. 3183.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक, ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) योजना, 1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) , खंड 5 , खंड 6 , खंड 7 और खंड 8 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात , श्री वी. के. चोपड़ा, अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबन्ध निदेशक, भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक को उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 31-3-2006 तक या अंगला आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो, कारपोरेशन बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं० 9 /31/2004-बी. ओ.1 ( iii ) ]

रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th December, 2004 by clause ( a ) of Sub section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act . 1970 read with Sub- clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3. Clause 5. Clause 6. Clause 7 and Sub - clause ( 1 ) of Clause 8 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme . 1970, the Central Government after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India. hereby appoints Shri K. Cherian Verghese, Chairman and Managing Director . Corporation Bank as Chairman and Managing Director. Union Bank of India for the period from the date of his taking charge and upto 31-03-2006 or until further orders . whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 9 /31 /2004-BO- 1 ( i) ]

RAMESH CHAND, Under Secy.

S. O. 3183. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a ) of Sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act. 1980 read with Sub - clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3 , Clause 5 , Clause 6 , Clause 7 and Sub - clause 9596

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

( 1) of Clause 8 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1980 , the Central Government after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby appoints Shri V.K. Chopra . Chairman and Managing Director , Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDB1 ) as Chairman and Managing Director, Corporation Bank for the period from the date of his taking charge and upto 31-03-2006 or until further orders , whichever isearlier.

[ F. No. 9/31 /2004 - BO- 1 (iii) ] RAMESH CHAND. Under Secy .

(बीमा प्रभाग) नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम्बर , 2004

का. आ. 3184.-जीवन बीमा निगम अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 31 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा श्री आर. एन. भारद्वाज, भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंध निदेशक, को 26,000 रुपए ( नियत ) के वेतनमान में, पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 31-5-2005 अर्थात् उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख तक या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम का अध्यक्ष नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 14/11/2004- बीमा IV ] आर ० रंगानाथ, निदेशक (Insurance Division) New Delhi , the 8th December, 2004

S. O. 3184. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act . 1956 (31 of 1956 ) the Central Government hereby appoints Shri R.N. Bhardwaj . Managing Director, Life Insurance Corporation of India as the Chairman , Life Insurance Corporation of India in the pay of Rs . 26,000/- ( fixed) with effect from the date he assumes charge of the post upto 31-05-2005 i.c. the date of superannuation or till further orders whichever is carlier.

[F. No. 14/ 11 /2004- Ins. IV] R. RENGANATH , Director नई दिल्ली, 13 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3185.-जीवन बीमा निगम अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 31 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा श्री ए.के. शुक्ला, भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंध निदेशक, को तत्काल प्रभाव से 30-04-2006 तक अर्थात् उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, उपर्युक्त निगम का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं . 14/ 11 /2004- बीमा IV]

आर० रंगानाथ, निदेशक New Delhi , the 13th December , 2004

S. O. 3185. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act. 1956 (31 of 1956 ) the Central Government hereby appoints Shri

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii)] A.K. Shukla , Managing Director , Life Insurance Corporation of India as Member of the said Corporation with immediate effect upto 30-04-2006 i.e. the date of superannuation or till further orders, whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 14/11/2004- Ins . IV]

R. RENGANATH, Director नई दिल्ली, 13 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3186.-जीवन बीमा निगम अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 31 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा श्री के. श्रीधर, भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंध निदेशक, को तत्काल प्रभाव से 31-01-2006 तक अर्थात् उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, उपर्युक्तनिगम का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 14/11/2004- बीमा IV ]

आर० रंगानाथ, निदेशक New Delhi , the 13th December, 2004 S. O. 3186.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act . 1956 (31 of 1956) the Central Government hereby appoints Shri K. Sridhar, Managing Director, Life Insurance Corporation of India as Member of the said Corporation with immediate effect upto 31-01-2006 i.e. the date of superannuation or till further orders , whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 14/ 11 /2004- Ins . 1V] R. RENGANATH, Director संचार एवं सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (डाक विभाग ) (डाक जीवन बीमा निदेशालय ) नई दिल्ली, 18 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3187.- महानिदेशक, डाक डाकघर बीमा निधि नियमावली के नियम 10 के जरिए प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और 31-03-2001 की स्थिति के अनुसार ग्रामीण डाकघर जीवन बीमा निधिकी परिसंपत्तियों और देयताओं के बीमांकक मूल्यन के आधार पर मृत्यु होने की वजह से या परिपक्वता पर ग्रामीण डाक जीवन बीमा पालिसियों के दावे बनने पर 31-03-2001 को समाप्त वर्ष के लिए निम्नलिखित दरों पर साधारण प्रतिवर्ती बोनस की घोषणा करते हैं :

बीमा पालिसी का प्रकार

बोनस की दर

(i ) आजीवन बीमा प्रति हजार बीमित राशि पर 60/- रु.

( ii ) बंदोबस्ती बीमा एवं प्रति हजार बीमित राशि पर 50/ - रु.

प्रत्याशित बंदोबस्ती बीमा

2. ऐसी पालिसियों के लिए 01-04-2001 से 31-12-2004 तक की अवधि के दौरान परिपक्वता या मृत्यु की वजह से उत्पन्न हुए सभी दावोंके लिए ऊपर उल्लिखित दर पर अंतरिम बोनस भी देय होगा जिनके प्रीमियम अदा कर दिए गए हैं और जिनकी 01-04-2001 से 31-12-2004 ( 01-04-2001 को या इसके बाद जारी पालिसियोंके 9597 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Policies on their becoming claims , due to death or maturity atthe following rates for the year ending 31-03-2001 :-

संदर्भ में बीमा के प्रथम पालिसी वर्ष सहित ) तक की अवधि के दौरान प्रविष्टिकर दी गई है ।

Rate of Bonus

Type of Insurance Policy

Rs.60/- per thousand of sum assured

(1) Whole Life Assurance

3. बोनस की राशि में 50 पैसे या अधिक के अंश को अगले उच्चतर रुपए में पूर्ण कर दिया जाएगा और 50 पैसे से कम के अंश को हिसाब में नहीं लिया जाएगा ।

(ii) Endowment

Rs . 50 /- per thousand of sum assured

4. इसे वित्त परामर्श ( डाक ) की डायरी सं. 2159 दिनांक 16-11-2004 के जरिए प्राप्त उनकी सहमति से जारी किया जाता है ।

Assurance & Anticipated Endowment Assurance

[सं. 5-2/2001- एलआई ] वी. पती, अपर महाप्रबंधक

MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

(Department of Post)

2. Interim bonus at the rates mentioned above will also be payable for all claims arising due to maturity or death during the period from 01-04-2001 to 31-12-2004 for policies for which premium has been paid and entered upon during the period 01-04-2001 to 31-12-2004 ( including first Policy year of assurance in respect ofpolicies issued onor after 01-04-2001 ) .

DIRECTORATE OF POSTAL LIFE INSURANCE

New Delhi , the 18th November, 2004

3. The amount of bonus involving a fraction of- 50 paise or more shall be rounded off to the next higher rupee and fraction below 50 paise shall be ignored .

4. This issues with the concurrence of Finance Advice ( Postal ) vide their Diary No. 2159 dated 16-11-2004.

[No.5-2/2001 -LI]

V. PATI , Addl . General Manager S. O. 3187. In exercise of the powers conferred vide Rule 10 of Post Office Insurance Fund Rules and on the basis of Actuarial Valuation of the assets and liabilities ofRural Post Office Life Insurance Fund as on 31-03-2001 the Director General (Posts ) , is pleased to declare a simple Reversionary Bonus on the Rural Postal Life Insurance

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(स्वास्थ्यविभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 3188.- दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 3 के खंड (क ) के अनुसरण में, तमिलनाडु के राज्य दंत चिकित्सक रजिस्टर में पंजीकृत दंतचिकित्सकों ने 27-06-2003 से डा. आर. गुनासीलन को भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् में निर्वाचित किया । 2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 3 के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में डा. एस. जी. डाम्ले को दिनांक 7-7-2003 से भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् का सदस्य निर्वाचित किया है ।

3. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 3 के खंड ( घ) के अनुसरण में निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को निम्नलिखित प्रत्येक विश्वविद्यालय और तारीखों से भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा में निर्वाचित किया गया है:

तारीख

विश्वविद्यालय

नाम

क्र.सं.

27-01-04

गुवाहाटीविश्वविद्यालय

डा. पी.डी. बोरा

25-11-03

नार्थ बंगाल विश्वविद्यालय

2. डा. सूमेन चक्रवर्ती

02-12-03

केरल विश्वविद्यालय

3. डा. के. नंद कुमार

14-09-03

अलीगढ़ मुस्लिमविश्वविद्यालय

4. प्रो. एस. एच. हाशमी

29-10-03

महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय

डा. मानसिंह गणपति पवार

4. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 3 के खंड ( ङ) के अनुसरण में प्रत्येक राज्य सरकार द्वारा निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को निम्नलिखित तारीखों से भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् में नामांकित किया गया है:

तारीख

राज्य

नाम

क्र.सं.

22-08-03

गोवा

डा. पी. के. चन्द्र

23-09-03

मध्य प्रदेश

डा. जी. डी. अग्रवाल

26-06-03

पंजाब

डा. विकास जिंदल

10-02-03

पश्चिम बंगाल

डा. ज्वाय गोपाल राय

9598

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (डा. विकास जिंदल को पंजाब सरकार द्वारा उस आकस्मिक रिक्ति पर नामांकित किया गया है जो डा. बी.एल. गोयल, जिनका कार्यकाल 13-12-2005 तक था, के नामांकन को वापिस लेने के कारण हुई थी) 5. अतः , अब उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के साथ पठित धारा 3 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा भारत सरकार, स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय ( स्वास्थ्य विभाग ) की दिनांक 24 जनवरी , 1984 अधिसूचना सं . का० आ० 430 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

' दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम, 1948 की धारा 3 ( क ) के अंतर्गत निर्वाचित शीर्षक के अधीन क्रम संख्या 1 के सामने निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी:-

निर्वाचित 1. डा. आर. गुनासीलन

27-06-2003 तमिलनाडु

'दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 3 ( ग ) के अधीन निर्वाचित ' शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत क्रम संख्या 4 के सामने निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी:-

निर्वाचित 4. डा. एस. जी. दामले , डीन,

नायर हास्पिटल डेंटल कालेज, डा. ए. एल. नायर रोड, बाइकुल्ला, मुंबई ( महाराष्ट्र)

7-7-2003 राज्यों के प्राचार्य, डीन , निदेशक तथा उप प्राचार्य तथा राज्यों के मेडिकल कालेजों के डेंटल विंगों केप्रमुख

' दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 की धारा 3 ( घ ) के अधीन निर्वाचित ' शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्याओं के सामने उल्लिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी:-

16. डा. पी. डी. बोरा

निर्वाचित 25. डा. सौमेन चक्रवर्ती

निर्वाचित

निर्वाचित 6. डा. के . नंदकुमार

27-01-04

गुवाहाटीविश्वविद्यालय

नार्थ बंगाल विश्वविद्यालय

25-11-03

केरलविश्वविद्यालय

निर्वाचित 34. प्रो. एस. एच. हाशमी

19. डा. मानसिंग गणपति पवार

निर्वाचित

02-12-03

14-09-03

अलीगढ़ मुस्लिम विश्वविद्यालय

महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय

29-10-03 .

' दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 3 (ङ) के अधीन नामित ' शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्याओं के सामने उल्लिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी:-

18. डा. पी. के चन्द्र

नामित

नामित 8. डा. जी. डी. अग्रवाल, भोपाल

7. डा. विकास जिंदल

नामित 12. डा. ज्वाय गोपाल राय

नामित गोवा

22-08-03

मध्यप्रदेश

23-09-03

पंजाब

26-06-03

पश्चिम बंगाल

10-02-03

[सं.वी . 12013/5/2003- पी.एम. एस. ]

ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health)

New Delhi , the 30th Novermber , 2004

S.O. 3188.- Whereas , in pursuance of clause (a ) of Section 3 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Dentists registered in the state Dentists Register of Tamil Nadu elected Dr. R. Gunaseelan to the Dental Council of India with effect from 27-06-2003,

2. Whereas . in pursuance of clause (c ) of Section 3 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , Dr. S.G. Damle has been elected to the Dental Council of India with effect from07-07-2003 .

3. Whereas . in pursuance of clause ( d) of Section 3 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the following persons have been elected to the Dental Council of India from each of the Universities and with effect from the dates mentioned below :-

9599 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Date

Name

S. No.

University

27-01-04

Gauhati University

1. Dr. P. D. Bora

25-11-03

North Bengal University

Dr. Soumen Chakraborty

02-12-03

3. Dr. K. Nandkumar

University ofKerala

14-09-03

4. Prof S. H. Hashmi

AligarhMuslim University

29-10-03

5. Dr. Mansing Ganpati Pawar Maharashtra University ofHealth Science

4. Whereas , in pursuance of clause ( e) of Section 3 of the Dentists , Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948) , the following persons have been nominated to the Dental Council of India by each of the State Governments and with effect from the dates mentioned below :

Date

State

Name

S. No.

22-08-03

Goa

Dr. P. K. Chandra

23-09-03

Madhya Pradesh

Dr.G. D. Aggarwal

26-06-03

Punjab

3. Dr. Vikas Jindal

10-02-03

WestBengal

4. Dr. Joy Gopal Roy

(Dr. Vikas Jindal has been nominated by the Punjab Government on the casual vacancy created by the withdrawal of nomination of Dr. B. L. Goel whose tenure was up to 13-12-2005 . )

5. Now, therefore in pursuance of Section 3 read with Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Department of Health ) No. S. O. 430 dated 24th January 84, namely:-

Against Serial No. 1 under the heading 'Elected u/s 3 (a) of the Dentists Act, 1948 ' , the following entries shall be substituted :-

27-06-2003

TamilNadu

Elected

1. Dr. R. Gunaseeelan,

Against Serial No. 4 under the heading ' Elected U/s 3 (C) of the Dentists Act, 1948 ' , the following enteries shall be substituted :----

7-7-2003

Elected

4. Dr. S. G. Damle, Dean, Nair Hospital Dental College , Dr. A. L. Nair Road, Byculla, Mumbai (Maharashtra) .

Principles ,, Deans , Directors and VicePrinciples of Dental Colleges inthe States and Heads of Dental Wings ofMedical Colleges in the States.

Against the Serial Nos . given below , under the heading ' Elected U/s 3 (d) of the Dentists Act, 1948 ' , the entries mentioned against them shall be substituted:-

27-01-04

Elected Gauhati University

16 Dr. P. D. Bora

25-11-03

Elected North Bengal University

Dr. Soumen Chakraborty

02-12-03

Elected University of Kerala

6 Dr. K. Nandkumar

14-09-03

Elected Aligarh Muslim University

34 Prof. S. H. Hashmi

29-10-03

Elected

19 Dr. Mansing Ganpati Pawar

Maharashtra University of Health Science 9600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Against the Serial Nos . given below, under the heading ' Nominated U/s 3 (e ) of the Dentists Act, 1948 ' , the entries mentioned against them shall be substituted:-

18 Dr. P. K. Chandra

Nominated

Goa

22-08-03 8 Dr. G. D. Aggarwal , Bhopal

23-09-03

Nominated

Madhya Pradesh

7 Dr. Vikas Jindal

26-06-03

Nominated

Punjab

12 Dr. Joy Gopal Roy

Nominated WestBengal

10-02-03

[No. V- 12013/5 /2003 -PMS]

A. K. SINGH , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 6 दिसम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 3189. - भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद्अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु कैलाबर यूनिवर्सिटी, नाइजीरिया द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता एम बी बी सी एच; उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;

और, डा. रोजेलिन डयूक, नाइजीरियाई नागरिक जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है अरविंद आई हास्पिटल्स, मदुरै ( तमिलनाडु ) से धर्मार्थ ( चैरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़े हैं ;

अतः , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है किभारत में डा. रोजेलिन ड्यूक द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधि:-

(क) 1 जनवरी , 2005 से आगे छह माह की अवधि; अथवा

( ख ) उस अवधि, जिसके दौरान डा. रोजेलिन ड्यूक, अरविंद आई हास्पिटल्स, मदुरै ( तमिलनाडु ) से जुड़े हैं, इनमें से जो भी कम हो, तकसीमित रहेगी ।

[सं.वी-11016/1/2004 - एम ई (नीति-1 ) ]

पी.जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 6th December, 2004

S.O. 3189.- Whereas medical qualification MBBCH granted by University of Calabar , Nigeria, is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act:

And whereas Dr. Roseline Duke, Nigerian National , who possess the said qualification is attached to Aravind Eye Hospitals , Madurai ( Tamil Nadu) for the purpose of training and technique demonstration and not for personal gain;

Now . therefore, in pursuance of clause ( c ) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Roseline Duke in India shall be limited to:-

( a) a period of six months from 1st January , 2005 onwards; or

ز (b) the period during which Dr. Roseline Duke is attached to Aravind Eye Hospitals , Madurai (Tamil Nadu) whichever is shorter .

[No. V- 11016/ 1/2004-ME(Policy-1)]

P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 6 दिसम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 3190.- केन्द्र सरकार ने भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में तथा हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार के साथ परामर्श करके डा. एल. एस. पाल, प्राचार्य, आई.जी.एम.सी. , शिमला को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में मनोनीत किया है ।

अतः , अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्;

9601 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अधीन मनोनीत " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 21 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी; अर्थात्:-

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार"

" 21. डा. एल.एस. पाल ,

प्राचार्य,

इंदिरा गांधी मेडिकल कालेज, शिमला-171001 ( हिमाचल प्रदेश )

[सं. वी-11013/1/2004- एमई( नीति-1 ) ]

पी.जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 6th December, 2004

S.O. 3190. Whereas the. Central Government, in pursuance of clause (a) of sub -section (1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) and in consultation with the Government of Himachal Pradesh have nominated Dr. L.S. Pal , Principal , IGMC, Shimla to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the date of issue of this notification.

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 138, dated the 9th January , 1960 , namely;

In the said notification, under the heading, ' Nominated under clause (a) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ' , for serial number 21 and the entries thereto , the following serial number and entries shall be substituted, namely:-

Govt. ofHimachal Pradesh "

"21. Dr. L.S. Pal,

Principal, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla- 171001 (Himachal Pradesh)

[No. V-11013/1/2004 -ME(Policy-1) ] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

रेल मंत्रालय

(रेत्मवे बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2004

का० आ० 3191.- राष्ट्रपति, संविधान के अनुच्छेद 309 के परंतुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए रेल सेवा ( पेंशन ) नियम, 1993का और संशोधन करने के लिए निम्मलिखित नियम बनाते हैं , अर्थात्:-

1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम रेल सेवा ( पेंशन ) ( संशोधन ) नियम, 2004 है ।

(2) ये 22 नवम्बर, 2003 से प्रवृत्त हुए समझे जाएंगे ।

2. रेल सेवा ( पेंशन ) नियम, 1993 में:-

(क) नियम 20 में, दूसरे परंतुक में, खंड ( ख ) के पश्चात्, निम्नलिखित खंड अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्: - " (ग) नियम 34 के अधीन खंड ( ख ) के उपबंध सिविल पेंशन के लिए सेना में सेवा की संगणना करने के मामलों में लागू नहीं होंगे।"

(ख) नियम 34 के उपनियम ( 1 ) में, " अठारह वर्ष की आयु प्राप्त कर लेने के पश्चात्" शब्दों का लोप किया जाएगा।

[सं. एफ. ( ई) II1 /2004/ पीएन 1/ 21 ( संशोधन) ]

वी. एन. माथुर, सचिव, रेलवे बोर्ड और पदेन अपर सचिव 3606 G1/04-2 9602

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] टिप्पण:-रेल सेवा( पेंशन ) नियम, 1993 अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 930 ( अ) तारीख 3 दिसंबर, 1993 द्वारा प्रकाशित किए गए थे और तत्पश्चात् का.आ. सं . 511 तारीख 25 फरवरी, 1995 , का.आ. सं. 1026, तारीख 15 अप्रैल , 1995 , का.आ. सं . 544 , तारीख 15 जुलाई , 2000 , का.आ. सं. 1553 , तारीख 15 जुलाई 2000 , का.आ. सं. 1081 , तारीख 30 मार्च, 2002 , का.आ. सं. 1214( अ ) तारीख 4 नवम्बर, 2004, और का.आ. सं. 1488( अ) तारीख 30 दिसंबर, 2003 अधिसूचनाओं द्वारा संशोधित किए गए थे ।

व्याख्यात्मक ज्ञापन:

रेल सेवा ( पेंशन ) नियम , 1993 , 3 दिसम्बर, 1993 को प्रवृत्त हुए थे । नियम 20 और 34 के अधीन सैन्य सेवा में अठारह वर्ष पूरे करने से पूर्व की गई सेवा की अवधि सिविल पेंशन के लिए अर्हक नहीं है । रेलवे बोर्ड ने 13 अक्तूबर , 2004 को यह प्रस्ताव अनुमोदित किया था जिससे सिविल/रेलवे में सेवारत सैन्य कर्मी सैन्य सेवा में अठारह वर्ष पूरे होने से पहले उनके द्वारा सेवा की अवधि को सिविल पेंशन के लिए अर्हक सेवा में गिने जाने के लिए पात्र हो सकें । इसे और अधिक लाभप्रद और साम्यापूर्ण बनाने के उद्देश्य से उक्त नियमों का संशोधन 22 नवम्बर, 2003 से भूतलक्षी प्रभाव सेकिया जाता है ।

A 2. उक्त नियमों का भूतलक्षी प्रभाव से संशोधन किसी भी कर्मचारी के हित पर कोई प्रतिकूल प्रभाव नहीं डालेगा ।

MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

(RailwayBoard)

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004

S.O. 3191. In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, the President hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Railway Services (Pension) Rules , 1993 , namely:-

1. ( 1 ) These rules may be called the Railway Services (Pension ) (Amendment) Rules , 2004 .

(2) They shall be deemed to have come into force from the 22nd day ofNovember , 2003 .

2. In the Railway Services ( Pension) Rules, 1993 :-

(a) in rule 20, in the second proviso , after clause (b) , the following clause shall be inserted, namely :- "( c ) the provisions of clause (b ) shall not be applicable in the cases of counting of military service. forcivil pension under rule 34" ,

(b) in rule 34, in sub -rule ( 1 ) , the words " after attaining the age of eighteen years " shall be omitted.

[No. F (E) III/2004/PN1 / 21 ( Amendment) ]

V. N. MATHUR, Secy. Railway Board and Ex-Officio Addl. Secy.

Note : The principal rules were published vide notification number S.O. 930 (E ) dated, the 3rd December, 1993 and subsequently amended vide notifications number S.O. 511 dated the 25th February , 1995 , S.O. 1026 dated the 15th April , 1995 , S.O. 1544 dated the 15th July , 2000 , S.O. 1553 dated the 15th July, 2000 , S.O. 1081 dated the 30th March, 2002 , S.O. 1214 ( E) dated the 4th November , 2004 and S.O. 1488 (E) dated the 30th December, 2003 .

Explanatory memorandum :

The Railway Services ( Pension ) Rules , 1993 came into force with effect from the 3rd December , 1993 . Under Rules 20 & 34 , the period of service rendered before attaining eighteen years in military service , does not qualify for the civil pension . The Railway Board , on 13th October , 2004, approved the proposal so as to enable the military personnel serving on the Civil/Railway side to count the period of service rendered by them in the military service before attaining eighteen years towards qualifying service for the civil pension . The amendment to the aforesaid rules is given retrospective effect from 22nd November , 2003 in order to make it more beneficial and equitable.

2. The amendment to the aforesaid rules with retrospective effect will not adversely affect the interest of any employee.

9603

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय (खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 6 दिसम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3192.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय ( खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण विभाग ) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन भारतीय खाद्य निगम के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय , जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है:-

1. भारतीय खाद्य निगम, जिला कार्यालय, देहरादून ( उत्तरांचल) ।

[सं. ई-11011 / 1 / 2001 -हिन्दी] अनीता चौधरी, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION (Department of Food and Public Distribution) New Delhi, the 6th December, 2004

S. O. 3192.- In pursuance of Sub - rule (4 ) of rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of Food Corporation of India under the administrative control of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs , Food and Public Distribution (Deptt . ofFood and Public Distribution) , where of more than 80% of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-

1. Food Corporation of India, District Office, Dehradun (Uttaranchal) .

[No. E- 11011 / 1 /2001 -Hindi ]

ANITA CHAUDHARY, Jt . Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 6 दिसम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3193.- केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) केअनुसरण में उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय ( खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण विभाग ) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को अधिसूचित करती है:-

1. केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम, सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाउस, मऊनाथ भंजन, श्री प्लेस के समीप, आजमगढ़ रोड, मऊनाथ भंजन-275101

2. केंन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम , सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाउस, कुकरा रोड, मुजफ्फरनगर-251001

3. केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम, एन.बी.आई.यू.पी.एस.आई.डी.सी. , प्लाट नं डी-1 , ( पो.आ. पी.एस.एल. ) नैनी-211016 ( इलाहाबाद)

4. केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम, सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाउस , बस्ती, प्लास्टिक काम्पलेक्स, पो.आ.पुरानी बस्ती, बस्ती-272001

5. केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम, सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाउस, सहारनपुर-1 , जनता रोड, सहारनपुर-247001

6. केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम, सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाउस, शाहगंज रेलवे क्रासिंग के पास, चीनी मिल शाहगंज के सामने , जिला जौनपुर-223101

7. केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम, सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाउस, फैजाबाद, नवीन मंडी, रायबरेली रोड, फैजाबाद-224001

8. केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम, सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाउस , शाहजहांपुर कृषि उत्थान मंडी समिति, रोजा, शाहजहांपुर -242001

9. केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम, सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाउस, गोरखपुर, नाकाहा जंगल , रेलवे स्टेशन , उर्वरक फैक्ट्री, गोरखपुर-273001

10. केन्द्रीय भंडारण निगम , सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाउस, हरदोई, 132के.बी. पावर स्टेशन, लखनऊ रोड, हरदोई -241001

[सं. ई-11011/1/2001-हिन्दी] अनीता चौधरी, संयुक्त सचिव 9604

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] New Delhi , the6th December, 2004

10. Central Warehousing Corporation, Central Warehouse, Hardoi, 132-K.B . Power Station, Lucknow Road, Hardoi -241001

[No. E- 11011/1/2001-Hindi]

ANITA CHAUDHARY, Jt. Secy.

कोयला मंत्रालय

S. O. 3193.-In pursuance ofSub - rule (4) of rule 10 ofthe Official Language (use for official purpose ofthe Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of Central Warehousing Corporation Under the administrative control of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs , Food and Public Distribution (Deptt. ofFood and Public Distribution) , where of more than 80% of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 3194.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लेखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है;

1. Central Warehousing Corporation, Central Warehouse , Maunath Bhajan, Near Shree Place , Azamgarh, Maunath Bhanjan -275101

2. Central Warehousing Corporation, Central Warehouse , Muzaffarnagar, Muzaffarmagar-251001

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 (1957 का 20 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है:

3. Central Warehousing Corporation , Central Warehouse , NBIUPSIDC, PlotNO. D- 1 , (Post-P.S.L. , ) Naini -211010 (Allahabad)

2. इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं. डब्ल्यूसीएल/सी-1 ( ई ) III/जेजेएनआर/712-0104, तारीख 10 जनवरी, 2004 का निरीक्षण वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड (राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल इस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर-440001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में या कलेक्टर, यवतमाल ( महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काऊंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है;

4. Central Warehousing Corporation, Central Warehouse , Basti , Plastic Complex, P.O. Purani Basti , Basti-272001

5. Central Warehousing Corporation , Central Warehouse . Saharanpur - 1 , Janta Road, Saharanpur - 247001

3. इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्धसभी व्यक्तिउक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चार्टों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 90 दिनों के भीतर भारसाधक अधिकारी/ विभागाध्यक्ष ( राजस्व) वेर्स्टन कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, कोल ईस्टेट, सिविल लाइन्स, नागपुर-440001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) को भेज सकेंगे ।

अनुसूची

कोलार-पिंपरी डीप विस्तारित खंड

6. Central Warehousing Corporation , Central Warehouse , Shahganj . Infront of Sugar Mills , Shahganj , Distt. Jaunpur-223101

वनी उत्तरी क्षेत्र

जिला-यवतमाल ( महाराष्ट्र)

7. Central Warehousing Corporation, Construction Wing, Faizabad New Mandi , Rai Bareli Road , Faizabad -224001

(रेखांक सं. डब्ल्यूसी एल/सी-1 ( ई )/III जेजेएनआर /712-0104 तारीख 10 जनवरी , 2004 )

" भाग-क"

क्रम ग्राम का पटवारी तहसील

क्षेत्र

जिला

टिप्पणी

सं. नाम

8. Central Warehousing Corporation, Central Warehouse , Shahjahanpur, krishi Utathan Mandi Samiti , Ro Shahjahanpur- 242001

सर्किल संख्यांक

हेक्टर में

1 गोवरी 31 वनी यवतमाल 75.00 भाग

2 कोलेरा 32 वनी

9. Central Warehousing Corporation, Central Warehouse , Gorakhpur, Nakaha Jungal Rly. Station, Fertilizer Factory, Gorakhpur- 273001

यवतमाल 156,00 भाग 9605 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

|भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भाग 'ख'

क्षेत्र टिप्पणी

तहसील

पटवारी

जिला

क्रम ग्राम का

हेक्टर

ङ-च

सं. नाम

में

सर्किल संख्यांक

रेखा बिन्दु ' ड' से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम अहेरी से होती हुई वर्धा नदी के दक्षिण किनारे से होती हुई जाती है और बिन्दु ' च ' पर मिलती है ।

30.00 भाग

यवतमाल

वनी

पिंपरी 32

च-छ-ज- ङ

भाग

यवतमाल 8.00

वनी

4 ब्राम्हनी 32

रेखा ग्राम अहेरी से होती हुई बिन्दु ' छ ' और ' ज ' को स्पर्श करती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु ' ड़' पर मिलती है ।

कुल क्षेत्र: 269.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग )

भाग ' ग'

" भाग-ख "

च-झः

टिप्पणी

क्षेत्र

तहसील जिला

कम ग्राम का पटवारी

रेखा बिन्दु ' च' से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम अहेरी से होती हुई वर्धा नदी के दक्षिण किनारे से होती हुई जाती है और बिन्दु ' श ' पर मिलती है ।

हेक्टर

सं. नाम

में

सर्किल संख्यांक

झ-অ:

43.52 भाग

वनी यवतमाल

अहेरी

रेखा ग्राम अहेरी तथा बोरगांव की सम्मिलित सीमा से होकर ग्राम बोरगांव से होती हुई जाती है और बिन्दु 'अ' पर मिलती है ।

कुल क्षेत्र: 43.52 हेक्टर ( लगभग )

ब-रः

"भाग-ग "

रेखा ग्राम बोरगांव 'तथा जुनाड़ की सम्मिलित सीमा से होकरग्राम बोरगांव से होती हुई जाती है और बिन्दु' ट' पर मिलती है ।

टिप्पणी

क्षेत्र

तहसील

पटवारी

जिला

क्रम ग्राम का

ट-च:

हेक्टर

सं. नाम

रेखा ग्राम बोरगांव तथा अहेरी से होती हुई जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु ' च' पर मिलती है ।

में

सर्किल संख्यांक

[संख्या 43015/ 15/2004- पी० आर० आई० डब्ल्यू० ]

भाग

55:48

यवतमाल

वनी

अहेरी 32

राजीव शर्मा, संयुक्त सचिव

भाग

60.00

वनी यवतमाल

MINISTRY OF COAL

2. बोरगांव 33

New Delhi, the 14th December, 2004 कुल क्षेत्र: 115.48 हेक्टर ( लगभग )

कुल क्षेत्र भाग क, ख और ग = 269 + 43.52+ 115.48 3428.00 हेक्टर (लगभग ) या

S.O. 3194.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands mentioned in the schedule hereto annexed;

1057.588 एकड़ ( लगभग)

सीमा वर्णन:-

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein .

भाग' क'

क-ख: रेखा बिन्दु ' क ' से आरम्भ होती है और ग्राम गोवारी, कोलेरा, और पिंपरी से होते हुए ग्राम पिंपरी और अहेरी की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा से होती हुई जाती है और बिन्दु ' ख ' पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग:

2. The plan bearing No. C- I (E ) III/JJNR/ 712-0104 dated the 10th January , 2004 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the Office of the Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department), Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur-440001 or in the office of the Collector, Yavatmal (Maharashtra ) or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street, Calcutta.;

रेखा ग्राम पिंपरी से होती हुई जाती है तथा ग्राम पिंपरी और कोलेरा की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु ' ग' पर मिलती है ।

ग-घः रेखा ग्राम कोलेरा , ब्राहम्णी और गोवारी से होती हुई बिन्दु' घ ' पर मिलती है ।

घ-क:

3. All persons interested in the lands covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub -section (7) of section 13 of the said Act to the Officer- in -Charge Head of the Revenue Department, Western Coalfields, Limited, Coal Estate, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440001 , within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.

रेखा ग्राम गोवरी से होती हुई जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु' क ' पर मिलती है । 9606

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

Schedule

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

Kolar-Pimpri Deep Extension Block

Wani North Area

District-Yavatmal (MAHARASHTRA)

(Plan No. C- I (E ) III/ JJNR/712-0104, dated the 10th January, 2004).

Nameof village

Serial number

Patwari circle number

PART-A

Gowari

Wani

Kolera

Wani

Pimpri

Wani

Bramhni

Wani

PART-B 1

Aheri

Wani

PART-C 1

Aheri

Wani

Borgaon

Wani

Total Area ofpart A, B and C269.00 + 43.52 + 115.48

Boundary description :---

PART - A

A-B :

Tahsil

District

Remarks Area in hectares

75.00

Yavatmal

Part Yavatmal 156.00

Part 30.00

Yavatmal

Part 8,00

Yavatmal

Part TotalArea 269.00

43.52

Yavatmal

Part TotalArea 43.52

55.48

Yavatmal

Part

60.00

Yavatmal

Part TotalArea: 115.48

-428.00 hectares (approximately) or

-1057.588 acres (approximately)

passes along the Lines starts from point ' A'and passes through villages Gowari, Kolera, and Pimpri and pas commonvillage boundary ofvillages Pimpri and Aheri and meets at point 'B '

-C : Line passes through village Pimpri and meets at Point ' C ' on common village boundary ofvillages Pimpri andKolera.

-D : Line passes through villages Kolera, Bramhrni , and Govari and meets at point 'D'

D-A : Line passes through village Gowari and meets at starting point ' A'

PART-B

-F : Line starts frompoint 'E' and passes through village Aheri along the southern bank ofWardha river and meets at point ' F' .

F-G- H-E Line passes through village Aheri at point ' G ' - ' H ' and meets at starting point 'E' .

PART-C

F-I : Line starts from point 'F' and passes through village Aheri along the southern bank ofWardha river and meets at point ' I' .

I-J : Line passes through common boundary of villages Aheri and Borgaon and then passes through village Borgaon and meets at point ' J' .

J-K : Line passes through common boundary of villages Borgaon and Junad and passes through village Borgaon and meets at point 'K' .

K-F : Line passes through villages Borgaon and Aheri and meets at starting point ' F'

[No:43015/ 15/2004/PRIW] RAJIV SHARMA, Jt . Secy .

9607 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 13 दिसम्बर , 2004

का. आ. 3195.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा ( गुजरात ) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री रामकरण शर्मा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान संख्या 1418 , सेक्टर -6 , बहादुरगढ़ -124507 , जिला झज्जर ( हरियाणा ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

तहसील : शाहपुरा

जिला: जयपुर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाटा

खसरा सं.

3 1. शिवपुरी

8119 (स.नदी)

8114(स.भूमि)

8113

8112

8115

8111

8110

8109

8096

8098

8097

8079

8073

8075

8076

8077

8078

8063

8056/8470

8056/8469

8062

8056

8041

8040

8037

8029

8034

8035

7919

7924

7925

7926 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर

01.

3 18

39 9609

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

तहसील : शाहपुरा

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

7927 शिवपुरी (जारी ... )

7928

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

6 4

7817 (स .रास्ता)

7406

7398

7405

7402

7399

7420

7479

16 0

43 0

50 0

7421/1 (पी. उदय, डी.)

7421/2

7378(स .रास्ता)

04 0

7372/2 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी.)

7372/1

7371

}

7371/2 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी.)

7370

7369

7349

5519

5517

5518

5516'

5521

5515

5547

5545/8736

5545

5557 (स. नाला)

2. टोडी

0.3

5557/8734

5565

5566 3606 G1/04-3

0 9610

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

तहसील : शाहपुरा

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

5568 2. टोडी (जारी...)

5572

5670

5669

5642

5667

5665

5644

5664

5654

5157

5158

5151

5149

5150

5147

5118

5122

5117

5125

5124

5127

5128

5051

5050

5048

5047

5046

5045

5010(स.भूमि)

4956

4957

4958

4965

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

6 0

96 0

16 0

55 0

43 0

67 0

24 0

72 0

82 0

04 0

84 0

30 0

72 0

80 0

61 0

10 0

28 0

73 0

36 0

09 0

88 9611

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

तहसील : शाहपुरा

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

4964 टोडी (जारी... )

4966

4963

4967

4969

4968

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

4938 (स. चरागाह)

4810/8672/2

4936

4920

4919/8668

4919

4811

4812

4813/8675

4813

4809/1

4809/1/1

4809/2

4827

4763/1 3. उदावाला

}

4763/2

}

4580

4617

4618

4628

4627

4629

4626

4634

14.

4635/8589

4636

4638

0 9612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

तहसील : शाहपुरा

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

जिला: जयपुर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

3 3. उदावाला (जारी ...)

4639

4732

4732/8371/1

4732/8371/2

4731

4730

4727

4713

4716

4718

4685

4689

4688

4686

4709(स.चरागाह)

4705

4703

4702

4706 4. निठारा

1509

1504

1503

1502

1498

1497

1496

1495

1494

1493

1492(स.नाला)

1486(स.चयगाह)

1482

1483 राज्य: राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

6 0

11 0

45 0

}

72 0

62 0

61 0

66 0

03 0

64 0

72 0

20 0

19 0

20 0

85 0

91 0

99 0

44 0

62 0

79 0

80 0

63 0

71 0

46 0

84 0

45 0

18 0

72 0

42 0

80 0

03 0

34 9613

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

तहसील : शाहपुरा

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

1484(स.चरागाह)

निठारा (जारी...)

1434

1438

1364

1363

1362

1371

1372

1376

97 0

1380/1576

1380

1382

1383

1386

1387

1421

1390

95 0

66 0

16 0

1395 (स.चरागाह)

1392

1397

32 0

1398 (स .चरागाह)

12 0

1400 (स.चरागाह)

18 0

1401 (स.नाला)

1352(स.बहेड)

5. लेटकाबास

1322(स.नाला)

82 0

1321 (स.बहेड)

1326

1327

1328

1329

1329/1

1330

97 0

20 0

}

1379/1406 (स . नाला)

9614

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

तहसील : शाहपुरा

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

1379/1427 5. लेटकाबास (जारी...)

1378

1376

1377

1381 (स.चरागाह)

1092

1093/1495

1093

1084(स.चरागाह)

1082

1083(स.बहेड)

1076 6. लाखनी

549

552

550(स.नाला)

551

545(स.चरागाह)

538

541

540

540/613 (स. चरागाह)

539(स.चरागाह)

557(स.चरागाह) 7. कांट

1891 (स.चरागाह)

1890(स.नाला)

1889(स. चरागाह)

1893(स.चरागाह)

1894(स.चरागाह)

1898 (स .चरागाह)

1899(स. चरागाह)

1900

1901/2102

1971/2102 }

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

6 0

80 0

87 0

30 0

86 0

20 0

70 0

85 0

32 0

93 0

09 0

55 0

38 0

21 0

60 0

07 0

71 0

15 0

37 0

31 0

77 0

45 0

09 0

94 0

55 0

37 40

94 0

95 0

38 0

84 9615 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

तहसील : शाहपुरा

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर क्रम सं.

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

1901/2103

कांट (जारी ... )

1907

1915

1914

1937

1938

1936

1939

1952

1967

1961

1962

1958

1975

1980

1982

1985

1988

1990

1996

1994

2000

2004

2008

2009/1

2009/2

سلم }

2011

2024

2022

2023(स.नाला)

1460(स.नाला)

2526

8. देवम

2525

2524 9616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

तहसील : शाहपुरा

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

2527 8. देवन (जारी...)

2516

2515

2514

2513

2511

2510

2539

2540

2541

2543

2544

2545

2547

1184

1189

1182(स.नदी)

1201

1202

1200

1209

1199

1216

1219

1221 (स. रास्ता)

1289

1290

1288

1281

1291

1282

1280

1277

1276

1319(स. रास्ता)

1375

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

6 0

20 0

75 0

52 0

37 0

50 0

17 0

91 0

89 0

72 0

23 0

78 0

42 0

41 0

20 0

09 0

82 0

83 0

94 0

16 0

59 0

20 0

39 0

62 0

21 0

41 0

18 [ भान 11- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

9617

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

तहसील : शाहपुरा

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

स

जय का नाम

असरा सं.

1377 8. देवन (जारी ...)

1378

1392

1402

1403

1401

1406

1407

1413 हेक्टेयर एयर को मोटर

58 0

وہ 0

44 0

03 0

82 0

77 0

03 0

1410/2915

11 0

02 40

1412(स . रास्ता)

1410

1435 0

1435/2927

940

939

941

943

933

944

945

921 9. माधोकाबास

11 0

13 61

21 0

39 0

15 0

$4 0

950मिन(स.भूमि)

920

912

16 0

10 0

911(स.भूमि)

913

08 0

914(स.भूमि)

910 (स.भूमि)

890 (स.रास्ता)

874

873

870 36

87 0

0 9618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] तहसील : शाहपुरा

जिला: जयपुर

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

872

9. माधोकाबास (जारी...)

871

867

[फा. सं. आर-31015/60/2004- ओ.आर -11]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिष

New Delhi , the 13th December , 2004

S. O. 3195. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra ( Gujarat) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein ;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority, Mundra -Delhi Petroleum Product pipeline Project, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , 16 Krishana Vihar, Near Narayan Niwas, Gopalpura Bye- pass Road, Jaipur 302018 ( Rajasthan ).

9619

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

State: RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Khasara No. Sr. No Name oftheVillage

1. SHIVPURI

Area

Are Sq.mtr. Hectare

6 4

02 0

8119(G/L River)

73 0

8114(G/L)

8113

8112

8115

8111

8110

8109

8096

8098

8097

8079

8073

8075

8076

8077

8078

8063

32 0

81 0

20 0

59 0

21 0

87 0

59 0

73 0

8056/8470

53 0

8056/8469

8062

8056

8041

8040

8037

8029

8034

8035

7919

7924

7925

7926

29 0

94 0

97 0

83 0

62 0

75 0

39 9620

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

District : JAIPUR State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr. No

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

7927

1. SHIVPURI ( Contd ...)

7928

7817(G /L Cart Track)

7406

7398

7405

7402

7399

7420

7479

7421/1 (P.W.D. ))

7421/2

7378(G/L Cart Track)

7372/2(P.W.D. )

7372/1

7371

7371/2 (P.W.D.)

7370

7369

7349

5519

5517

5516

5521

5515

5547

5545/6736

5545

63 2. TODI

5557(G/ L Nala)

5557/8734

5565

5566

06 9621 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District: JAIPUR

Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

Area

Sq.mtr.

Are

Hectare

Khasara No.

Sr. No Name of the Village

5568

2. TODI ( Contd ...)

5572

5670

5669

5642

5667

5665

5644

5664

5654

5157

5158

5151

5149

5150

5147

5118

5122

5117

5125

5124

5127

5128

5051

5050

5048

5047

5046

5045

5010(G/L)

4956

4957

4958

4965 622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

District : JAIPUR

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr. No Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

6 2. TODI ( Contd ... )

4964

4966

4963

4967

4969

4968

4938(G/L Pasture)

4810/8672/1

4810/8672/2

}

4936

4920

4919/8668

4919

4811

4812

4813/8675

4813

4809/1

4809/1/1

4609/2

4827

93 3. UDAWALA

4763/1

4763/2

}

4580

4617

4618

4628

4627

4629

4626

4634

4635/8589

4636

4638

40 9623 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District: JAIPUR

Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

Area

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. Sr. No Name of the Village

4639

3. UDAWALA (Contd ... )

4732

4732/8371/1

4732/8371/2

}

4731

4730

4727

4713

4716

4718

4685

4689

4688

4686

4709(G/L Pasture)

4705

4703

4702

4706

1509

4. NITHARA

1504

1503

1502

1498

1497

1496

1495

1494

1493

06 80

1492(G/L Nala)

1486(G /L Pasture)

1482

1483 9624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

District : JAIPUR

Sr. No

Khasara No. Name of the Village.

3 4. NITHARA ( Contd ...)

1484(G/L Pasture)

1434

1438

1364

1363

1362

1371

1372

1376

1380/1576

1380

1382

1383

1386

1387

1421

1390

1395 (G / L Pasture)

1392

1397

1398(G/L Pasture)

1400(G/L Pasture)

1401(G/L Nala) 5. LETKABAS

1352(G/L Behad)

1322(G/L Nala)

1321(G/L Behad)

1326

1327

1328

1329

1329/1

1330

1379/1406(G /L Nala)

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4

6 0

21 0

01 0

30 0

84 0

76 0

21 0

17 0

79 0

72 0

97 0

28 0

95 0

66 0

68 0

86 0

93 0

02 66 0

16 0

00 0

79 0

12 0

18 0

58 0

71 0

82 0

63 0

97 0

86 0

}

75 0

58 9625 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

Area

Are

Khasara No.

Hectare

Sq.mtr. Sr. No Name of the Village

1379/1427

5. LETKABAS ( Contd ...)

1378

1376

1377

1381 (G/L Pasture)

1092

1093/1495

1093

1084(G/ L Pasture)

1082

1083(G/L Behad)

1076

549

6. LAKHANI

552

550(G/L Nala)

551

545(G/L Pasture)

538

541

540

540/613 (G /L Pasture)

539(G /L Pasture)

557 (G /L Pasture)

7. KANT

1891 (G/L Pasture)

1890(G/L Nala)

1889(G /L Pasture)

1893(G/L Pasture)

1894(G /L Pasture)

1898 (G /L Pasture)

1899(G/L Pasture)

1900

1901/2102

1971/2102

}

360 - GI/04-5 9626

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

District : JAIPUR

Khasara No. Sr. No Name of the Village

3 1

1901/2103 7. KANT ( Contd ... )

1907

1915

1914

1937

1938

1936

1939

1952

1967

1961

1962

1958

1975

1980

1982

1985

1988

1990

1996

1994

2000

2004

2008

2009/1

}

2009/2

2011

2024

2022

2023(G/L Nala)

1460(G/L Nala)

2526 8. DEVAN

2525

2524 State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4

31 0

09 0

39 0

92 0

56 0 .

71 0

59 0

83 0

14 0

40 0

45 0

21 0

09 0

76 0

50 0

39 0

07 9627

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

Khasara No. Sr. No Name of the Village

2527 8. DEVAN (Contd ... )

2516

2515

2514

2513

2511

2510

2539

2540

2541

2543

2544

2545

2547

1184

1189

Area

Sq.mtr.

Are

Hectare

6 4

22-

1182(G/L River)

1201

1202

1200

1209

1199

1216

1219

1221 (G /L Cart Track)

1289

1290

1288

1281

1291

1282

1280

1277

1276

1319(G/L Cart Track)

1375

0 9628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA:

DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

District: JAIPUR

Sr. No Nameof the Village

Khasara No. 1

3 8. DEVAN ( Contd ... )

1377

1378

1392

1402

1403

1401

1406

1407

1413 State: RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4

6 0

09 0

58 0

09 0

44 0

03 0

82 0

77 0

02 0

1410/2915

11 0

1412(G/L Cart track)

1410

1435 0

20 0

1435/2927

940

939

941

943

933

944

945 9. MADHOKABAS

921 0

20 0

11 0

81 0

21. 0

57 0

15 0

84 0

950Min(G/L)

920

912

57 0

76 0

10 0

911(G/L)

913 01

28 0

914(G/L)

910(G/L)

890(G/L Cart track)

874

873

870

25 9629 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Tehsil : SHAHAPURA

Area

Sq.mtr.

Are

Hectare

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Sr. No

872

MADHOKABAS ( Contd ... )

87.1

867

[No. R-31015/60/2004- O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3196.- केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ((भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खण्ड (क) के अनुसरण में नीचे दी गई अनुसूची के स्तम्भ ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित व्यक्ति को उक्त अनुसुची के स्तम्भ (2) में की तत्स्थानी प्रविष्टि में उल्लिखित क्षेत्र की बाबत , उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है अर्थात : -

अनुसूची

क्षेत्र

प्राधिकारी का नाम और पता

श्री परितोष चक्रबोरती, सेवानिवृत

पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य "पुरना किरन" शिबराम सरानी

लेक टाउन,डाकघरः भक्ती नगर , जिला जलपाईगुड़ी - 734425

पश्चिम बंगाल

[फा. सं. ओ -12016/1/2004-ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.-IV]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव 9630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3196.- In pursuance of clause(a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby Authorizes the person mentioned in column (1 ) of the Schedule given below to perform the functions of the Competent Authority under the said Act, in respect of the areas mentioned in column (2) of the said Schedule namely: -

SCHEDULE

Name and Address of the Authority

Area of Jurisdiction

State of West Bengal Shri Paritosh Chakraborthy , (Retired). , " Purna Kiran ", Shib Ram Sarani , Lake Town, P.O. Bhakti Nagar, Dist. Jalpaiguri , Pin: 734425 . WestBengal .

[No. O-12016/1/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3197.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धाम 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक : उदयन विहार , गुवाहाटी , 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । पिन 9631 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य : असम

जिला : मोरिगावॅ

सर्कल मोरिगाउँ

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

दाग सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

सोनाबारि डिक्वार्गे

292

376

मिकिर बोरि

375

372

371

308

हाति हलगं

307

306

305

283

285

250

288

321

264

276

277

270

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/ 2/2004 - ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th December, 200

S. O. 3197.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri ( West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right ofuser therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua, Competent Authority, Numaligarh- Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam ) .

9632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

SCHEDULE

Circle:Morigaon

State: Assam

District: Morigaon

Area

Sr. No

Name of the Village

Dag no.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

1 Chounabari Dikchang

292

2 Mikir Bori

376

375

372

371

3 HatiHulung

308

307

306

305

283

285

250

288

321

264

276

277

05 61

270

[No. O- 12016/2/ 2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy.

4नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ.. 3198.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए :

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है :

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी, नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक : उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी, 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । पिन 9633

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

सर्कल मोरंगि

राज्य : असम

जिला : गोलाघाट

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं.

3 1

90/225 1 औगुरी चापरि गाँव

477 2 पंका गाँव

473

474

472

461

327

463

356

355

359

84 3606 G1/04-6

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

60 9634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] मोरंगि

सर्कल

जिला : गोलाघाट

राज्य : असम

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं .

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 2 पंका गाँव

457

460

97 3 मोरन बिल गाँव

31 4 कलियनी गॉव

144

141

142

25.

143

140

138

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/3/2004-ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.-IV]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3198.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam)to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right ofuser therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited, Pipeline Head Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam) .

9635 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहाण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

State: Assam

District:Golaghat

Circle:Morangi

Sq.mtr.

Area Are

Hectare

Dag no.

Name of the Village

Sr. No

90/225

1. Ouguri Chapari Gaon

06.

477

2. Panka Gaon

473

474

472

461

327

463

356

355

359

73 9636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

Sr. No

Name of the Village

Dagno.

3 2. Panka Gaon

457

460

67 3. Maran Bill Gaon

8 4. Kaliyani Gaon

144

141

142

143

140

138

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr.

[No. O-12016/3/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3199.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालींगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

4 अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिमुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आर्येल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक : उदयन विहार , गुवाहाटी, 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेष भेज सकेगा । पिन 9637 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य : असम

जिला: गोलाधाट

सर्कल बोकाघाट

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

दाग सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

153

कलियनौ ब्लाक

187

186

185

184

180

181

182

291

282

176

175

320

321

161

162

163

344

377

164

363

144

143

103

111

110

265

353

264

105

347 9638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

सर्कल:बोकाधाट

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

जिला: गोलाघाट

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं.

3 1

कलियबौ ब्लाक

109

108

107

106

102

287

207 2

नूमालीगद बगीचा

राज्य : असम

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

S 0

14/178

192

9/179

बिहरा ग्रांट गावें

मिकिर सागं बगीचा

1/129

1/128

1/122

1/120

1/121

1/119

1/272

1/252

1/100

1/96

1/98

1/95

1/97

1/71

1/70

1/68 53

96.

11 9639 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: असम

जिला : गोलाघाट

सर्कल बोकाथाट

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

दाम सं.

गाँव का माम

क्रम सं.

बर चापरि बगीचा

57-

229

[फा. सं . ओ-12016/4/2004- ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.- IV]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3199.-[Whereas it appears to the Central Govemment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laidby Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed tobe laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua, Competent Authority, Numaligarh - Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

9640

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

Circle:Bokahat

State: Assam

District : Golaghat

Sr. No Name of the Village

Dagno.

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr. 1

6 1 Kaliyani Block

153

187

186

185

184

180

181

182

291

282

176

175

320

321

161

162

163

344

377

164

363

144

143

103

111

110

265

353

264

105

347

109

108

107

106

74 :9641

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Dag no. Sr. No

Name of the Village

102 1 Kaliyani Block

287

207

14/178 2 Numaligarh Bagisha

192

9/179

33 3 Bihora Grant

1/129 4 Mikir Chang Bagisha

1/128

1/122

1/120

1/121

1/119

1/272

1/252

1/100

1/96

1/98

1/95

1/97

1/71

1/70

1/68 3606G1/04-7

Area Are Sq.mtr. Hectare

42 0

01 9642

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] Sr. No

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. Name of the Village

Dagno.

6 2

5 Borchapari Bagisha

229

[No. O- 12016/4/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. -IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3200.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1.962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक उदयन विहार , गुवाहाटी , 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । पिन 9643 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य: असम

जिला : कामरूप

सर्कल सोनापुर

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

दाग सं .

गाँव का नाम

6 क्रम सं.

743

1 कचुतली पथार

615

741

742

561

2 दिगाडु पार

555

551

554

03.

553

550

530

514

513

412

510

345

481

07 3 जुवाइ

533

531

530

573

[फां. सं. ओ-12016/5/2004- ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.- IV]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3200.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right ofuser therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited, Pipeline Head Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar , Guwahati - 781171 (Assam) .

9644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Circle:Sonapur

State:Assam

District : Kamrup

Sr. No

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. Name of the Village

Dagno.

6 1

743

Kashutali Pathar

615

741

742

54 2

561

40 Digaru Par

555

551

554

553

550

530

514

513

412

510

345

31 3 Jubai

481

533

531

530

573

[No. O- 12016/5/2004-O.N.G ./D.O. - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3201.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

9645 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय, डाक उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी, पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : असम

जिला : मोरिगावें

सर्कल : मायेंग

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

दाम से.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

बिहिता गाँव

[फा. सं. ओ -12016/6/2004-ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.- IV ]

एन. सी. जांखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3201. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam)to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh- Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited, Pipeline Head Quarters, P.O. Udayan Vihar , Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

9646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

SCHEDULE

Circle:Mayong

State: Assam

District : Morigaon

Sr. No

Name of the Village

Hectare

Area Are

Dag no.

Sq.mtr. 1

1 Bihita Gaon

[No. O- 12016/6/2004-O.N.G./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3202.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिमुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक : उदयन विहार, मुवाहाटी, 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । पिन 9647

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य : असम

जिला : बंगाईगायें

बिजमी

सर्कल

दाग सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

3 1

4 1. धुपुरी

194

196

212

211

197

213

247 2 फागुना गाँव

246

245

165 3 सौरगुरी (भाग 1)

105 4 दाउतिझार

104

470

111

112

113

114

118

117

119

120

534

122

673 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर एयर

हेक्टेयर

0 9648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] सर्कल : बिजनी

जिला: बंगाईगायें

राज्य: असम

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर

वर्ग मीटर 2

6 4 दाउतिझार

577

574

107

127

;

115

116

[ फा. सं. ओ-12016/8/2004-ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3202.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire theright ofuser therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua, Competent Authority, Numaligarh -Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

9649 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड-3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

State: Assam Circle : Bijini

District: Bongaigaon

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. Sr. No

Dagno.

Name of the Village

1. Dhupuri

194

196

212

211

197

213

247

2 Phagunagaon

246

245

165

3 Sauraguri (Part 1 )

105

4 Dauthijhar

104

470

111

112

113

114

118

117

119

120

534

122

673

577

574

107

127

115

116

[No. O- 12016/8/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV

N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy. 3606G1/048 9650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3203.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिमुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय, डाक : उदयन विहार , गुवाहाटी , पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

बंगाईगायें

सर्कल

राज्य : असम

जिला : बंगाईगावें

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर

29 1 नयापारा (भाग 2)

29.

2 खारिजा दलायगॉव

503

502

501

498

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/8/2004- ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.- IV]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव 9651 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 14th December, 200

S. O. 3203.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua, Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar , Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

SCHEDULE

State:Assam

District : Bongaigaon

Circle:Bongaigaon

Area

Sq.mtr.

Are

Hectare

Dagno.

6 Name of the Village

Sr. No

1 Nayapara (Part 2)

503

2 Kharija Dalaigaon

502

501

498

[No. O-12016/8/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. -IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

9652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

4नईदिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3204.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आर्येल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइव बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और अनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीमद शिलिमुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय, डाक : उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी, 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । पिन

अनुसूची

बरनगर(सरभोग)

जिला : बरपेठा

राज्य : असम

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं. सर्कल :

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 1

170

चेंगेलीया (भाग 1 )

169

168

167

166

165

564

556

297

2 बन्दरखोवा (भाग 1 )

296

295

293

292

294

16 9653 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : असम

जिला: भरपेटा

सर्कल : बरनजर(सरमोन)

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेबर

दाग सं.

गाँव का माम

क्रम सं.

316

2. बन्दरखोवा(भाग 17

315

248

249

351

352

353

250

354

254

357

181

3 बन्दरखोवा(भाग 2)

384

180

179

178

378

382

361

380

177

176

379

In Bath Bvy. No.379 & 175

175

140

515

4 मुलुकाकोषा

533

534

517

500

561

706

707

363

5 कलधारी (भाग 1 )

504

6 कलबारी(भाग 2 )

577

7 दहलापारी

578

579

576

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/9/2004- ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर संचिव 9654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3204.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any persori interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh -Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam) .

SCHEDULE

Circle: Bamagar(Sorbhog)

District: Barpeta

Sr. No

Nameof theVillage

Dagno.

3 1. Chengeliya( Part 1)

170

169

168

167

166

165

564

556 2 Bandarkhowa ( Part 1)

297

296

295

293

292

294

316

315

248

249

351

352

353

250

354

254

357 State:Assam

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4

44 03 66 22246&701628 02 23 9655

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Dag no. Name of the Village

Sr. No

181 3 Bandarkhowa(Part2)

384

180

179

178

378

382

381

380

177

176

379

Sq.mtr.

Area Are

Hectare

In Betn Svy. No.379 & 175

175

140

515 4 Bhulukadoba

533

534

517

560

561

706

707

363 5 Kalbari (Part 1 )

504 6 Kalbari (Part 2)

577 7 Dahalapara

578

579

576

[No. O-12016/9/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर , 2004

का. आ. 3205.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

A कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिमुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक उदयन विहार, मुवाहाटी , पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II -SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

अनुसूची

सर्कल: कोकराझार

जिला : कोकराझार

राज्य : असम

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 1 बासुगाँव टाउन (भाग 1 )

693

64 2

बासुगाँव टाउन (भाग 2)

383

384

386

405

25 3 भुटियापारा

343

358

91 4 बन्दरचारा

553

20305024

200

199

198

197

196

194

193

190

188

170

102

103

549

106

107

105

109

110

59 9657 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य :

जिला : कोकराक्षार

कोकराझार

सर्कल :

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

दाग सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

111

बन्दरधारा

113

114

115

5 दोलोगाँव

194

185

6 फुकागाँव

186

534

190

191

192

AM87 177

7 कोकराझार गाँव

719

8 कोकराझार बगिचा

712

713

3606 G1/04-9 9658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004 / AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] सर्कल : कोकराझार

जिला : कोकराझार

राज्य असम

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं .

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

8 8 कोकराझार बगिचा

714

715

710

708

707

691

689

[फा. सं. ओ -12016/10/2004-ओ. एनं.जी./डी.ओ.- IV ]

एन. सी. जोखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3205.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline should be laid by Oli India Limited;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisitionof Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua, Competent Authority, Numaligarh -Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, Pipeline Head Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar , Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

9659 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड. 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

State:Assam

Circle : Kokrajhar

District: Kokrajhar

Sr. No

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr.

Dagno.

Nameof the Village

693

1 Basugaon Town (Part-1)

383

2 Basugaon Town (Part-II)

384

386

405

343

3 Bhutiyapara

358

4 Bandarchara

553

200

190

193

197

196

00 03 02 888888 00 03

194

193

190

188

170

102

103

549

106

107

105

109

110 9660

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

Sr. No

Dagno.

Name of theVillage

3 4 Bandarchara

111

113

114

115

55 5 Dologaon

185 6 Fukagaon

186

188

187

189

534

190

191

192

178

177

180

4 7 Kokrajhar Gaon

719 8 Kokrajhar Bagisha

712

713 Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 4

1000

80 9661 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Sq.mtr.

Area Are

Hectare

Dagno.

Name of the Village

Sr. No

714

Kokrajhar Bagisha

715

710

708

707

691

689

[No. O- 12016/10/2004- O.N.G./D.O. -IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3206.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि बूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिमुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जगता को उपलब्ध करा दी आती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिमुरी पाइपलाईम प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी, पिन - 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

सर्कल दोटमा

जिला: कोकराझार

राज्य : असम

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दावा सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

450

प्रतापखादा (भाग 1)

451

453

452

455

677

25 2 महिष बथान

328

324

323

320

319

318

317

316

315

314

313

[फा. सं. ओ -12016/10/2004-ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3206.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleurn products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh -Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar , Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

9663

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भोग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

State:Assam

District : Kokrajhar

Circle: Dotma

Dag no. Name of the Village

Sr. No

450 Pratapkhata (Part-1 )

451

453

452

455

677

328 2 Mahish Bathan

324

323

320

319

318

317

316

315

314

313

Sq.mtr .

Area Are

Hectare

[No. O- 12016/10/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3207.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि ने जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूती में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछारे जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सस्कार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आसय कीघोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा की जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बहुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, बूमालीगद शिलिमुरी म प्रसारण परियोजना , आर्येल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय, डाक उदयन विहार, बुवाहाटी, पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

अनुसूची सर्कल :: भौरागुरी

जिला: कोकराझार

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं .

1 पटियाल प्रारा

295 2

63 पटियाल पारा अहम्मदपुर

108

109

110 3 घोनापारा

166 टोकियामरी (भाग 1 )

263

269

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : असम

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

00 នខន

71 9665 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : असम

जिला : कोकराइमर

भौरागुरी

सर्कल ::

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

दाग सं .

गाँव का माम

क्रम सं.

268

4 टोकियामरी (भाग 1)

172

256

255

[फा. सं..ओ -12016/10/2004-ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.-IV]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3207. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline shouldbe laid by Oil India Limited;

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisitionof Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire theright of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua, Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam ).

3606G1/04-10 9666

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

SCHEDULE State :Assam

District : Kokrajhar

Circle: Bhowraguri

Sr. No

Dagno.

Name of theVillage

3 1

295 1 Patiyal Para

63 2 Patiyal Para Ahammadpur

21-

108

109

110

31 3 Ghonapara

166 4 Tokeyamari (Part-1)

263 Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr.

32 9667 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Sq.mtr.

Area Are

Hectare

Dagno.

Name of the Village

Sr. No

269

Tokeyamari (Part-1)

268

172

256

255

[No. O- 12016/10/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. -IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3208.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिमुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय कीघोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिमुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय, डाक उदयन विहार, मुवाहाटी, पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूची

सर्कल गोसाईगाँव

जिला : कोकराझार

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं .

3 1

4 रीमीझिमि घाट (भाग 2)

3 2

390 रीमीझिमि घाट (भाग 1 )

389

370

369

388

371

312

313

361

360

315

299

316

317

298

318

296

294

295

297

285

282

284

283

225

224

226

231

227

230

130 3 श्रीरामपुर

505

504

503

502

501

436

435

434

432 राज्य : असम

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

60 9669

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

जिला : क्रोकराझार

सर्कल

गाँव का काम

क्रम सं.

187 हामरा

86 सिसुलटापु (भाग 3)

4 5

123 6 सिमुलटापु (भाग 2)

121

120

101

261

127

100

258

257

255

195

254

253

252

251

35.

247

103 7 सिमुनापु बलाक

104

101

105

107

108

100

182

123

121

140

120 एचर बर्ग मीटर 5

27 18

03 03

94 0

07 0

22 0

03 07 03 08888

74 01

73 14

23 0

04 11

02 13

06 0

33 0

93 0

47 02

65 0

01 9670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] सर्कल गोसाईगाँव

राज्य : असम

जिला: कोकराझार

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं .

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 7

118

82 सिमुलटापु ब्लाक

117

141

142

143

155

154

153

152

150

151

255

[ फा. सं. ओ-12016/10/2004- ओ.एन.जी./डी.ओ.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2004

S. O. 3208.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

9671 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii )]

SCHEDULE

State:Assam

District : Kokrajhar

Circle:Gossaigaon

Sq.mtr.

Area Are

Hectare

Dagno.

Name of the Village

Sr. No

1 Rimijhimi Ghat (Part-II)

390

2 Rimijhimi Ghat (Part- 1)

389

370

369

368

371

312

313

361

360

315

299

316

317

298

318

298

294

295

297

285

282

284

283

225

224

226

231

227

230

130

505

3 Shri Rampur

504

503

502

501

436

435

434

432

187

4 Damra 9672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Sr. No Name of the Village

Dagno.

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

5 Simultapu (Part-III )

123

Gimuttapu (Part-ll)

121

120

101

261

127

100

258

257

255

195

254

253

252

251

247

103

7 Simultapu Biock

104

101

105

107

108

190

122

123

121

140

120

118

117

141

142

143

62 9673 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Hectare

Area Are

Sr. No

Sq.mtr. Name of the Village

Dag no.

155

7 Simultapu Block

154

153

152

150

151

255

[No. O-12016/10/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3209.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस द्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इण्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के गोवा में उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश में संरचनाओ से महाराष्ट्र राज्य में पुणे . जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ । स्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइने बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपजाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अध्धि सूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिधकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमिं में उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन) अधि। नियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस . डी. भिसे सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जी. टी.आई. सी. एल. पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना , रेल इन्फोकाम , टी / 23 , टेल्को रोड , गवली माथा के पास , एमसीसीआय एंड ए के सामने , भोसरी पुणे 411026 , महाराष्ट्र राज्य को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

3606 G1/04-11 9674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

मंडल : खेड

जिल्हा: पुणे

गाँव का नाम

गट नं . / सब डिविजन नं .

225

1 ) साबळेवाडी

219

224

1514(पुराना नं.)

स. नं. 1514 (पुराना नं . ) और 220 के बीच का गाडी

रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

220

1412(पुराना नं.)

1511 (पुराना नं. 209)

214

212

211

213

215

स. नं. 215 और 13 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

17/अ

17/ब (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

28 (गवरमेन्टलॅण्ड)

415 (गवरमेन्टलॅण्ड) 2) बहुळ

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

आर ओ रेअर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफलल

आर

हेक्टर

सी- आर 3

5 00

98 00

71 00

20 00

55 00

57 00

67 00

11 00

89 00

63 00

88 00

08 00

85 00

67 00

85 00

64 00

71 00

15 00

54 00

32 00

33 00

09 01

00 00

स. नं. 415 और कॅनाल के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

स . न . 415 और 281 के बीच का बीच का कॅनाल

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

281

282/2 ( गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 282/2 और 276 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

276

275/अ

स . नं. 275/अ और 275/ब के बीच का गाडी रस्ता

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

275/ब

274

256

12 00

64 00

18 00

51 00

24 00

18 00

02-

08 00

51 00

57 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

1272(पुराना नं) 2) बहुळ (निरंतर )

स. नं. 1272 (पुराना नं) और 284 के बीच का नाला

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

284

स. नं. 284 और 257 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

257

255

254

253

स. न . 253 और 233 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

स. न. 253 और 233 के बीच का गाडी रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

233

1046(पुराना नं.)

1048(पुराना नं.)

स. नं. 1048 (पुराना नं.) और 78 के बीच का नाला

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

765(पुराना नं.)

1256

स. नं . 1258 और 1257 के बीच का रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1257

स. नं . 1257 और 530 (पुराना नं. ) के बीच का नाला

(कॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

530(पुराना नं.)

1029

1031

1030

सं. नं . 1030 और 1050/1 के बीच का रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1050

स. नं . 1050/2 और 1054 के बीच का नाल .

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1054

स. नं . 1054 और 1059 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1059

1058

961

स. नं . 961 और 960 के बीच का फिल्ड चॅनल

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

960

959

1847

3) पिंपळगाव तर्फ खेड

1868

9675

00 9676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

1864

3) पिंपळगाव तर्फ खेड (निरंतर )

स. नं . 1864 और 1865 के बीच का कॅनाल (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1865

1995

1872

1858 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1873

1874(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1875

1876

1877

1878

1879 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1880

1881

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 3

5 00

31 00

69 00

10 00

22 00

25 00

55 00

21 00

90 00

39 00

13 00

89 00

44 00

43 00

25 00

39 00

स. नं. 1881 और 1882 के बीच का फिल्ड चॅनल

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1882

1887

1889

70 00

15 00

98 00

37 00

स. नं. 1889 में बीच का फिल्ड चॅनल (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1890

1891

स. नं . 1891 और 1892 के बीच का कॅनाल (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1892

24 00

91 00

07 00

30 00

01 00

से. नं. 1892 और 1894 के बीच का रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1894(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

78 00

88 00

स. नं. 1894 में गाडी रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1912

1906

1902

1904

1903

1905

1907

1908

33 00

37 00

36 00

20 00

.10

स. नं. 1906 और 1972 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1978

85 9677

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

1979

3) पिंपळगाव तर्फ खेड (निरंतर )

1981

1982

स. नं . 1978 और 1982 के बीच का फिल्ड चॅनल

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 1978 और 1982 के बीच का फिल्ड चॅनल (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1983

1999

1959

1958

1957

1956

1955

1946

1952/1

स. नं . 1952/1 और रस्ता के बीच का कॅनाल (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

स. नं. 1952/1 और 1744/1 के बीच का रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1744

स. नं . 1744 और 1580 के बीच का फिल्ड चॅनल (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1743

1580

1582

1581

स. नं . 1581 और 1583 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1583

1584

1579

1586

1587

1589

1590/1

1590/2

1591

1592

1593

1594 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

394/1

394/2

393/14

393/1अ (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

स. नं. 393/1 अ और 393/2 के बीच का कॅनाल

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

393/2

5 3

55 00

24 00

79 00

00 00

94 00

82 00

15 00

60 00

05 00

54 00

44 00

00 9678

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

386

3) पिंपळगाव तर्फ खेड ( निरंतर )

388

385/1

385/2

385/1 अ (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

384

383

382

363/2

363/4(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

363/3

359

360

357

361

356

354

स. नं . 354 और 170/2 के बीच का रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

170/2 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1.71

172/अ

172/ब

173

174

175

स. नं . 175 और 176 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

176

164

191

192

193

195

196

197

198

210

199

211

212

231

230

232

235

236

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

06 9679

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

237

3) पिंपळगाव तर्फ खेड ( निरंतर )

249

250

258

257

226

255

254

253

252

251

गाव सीमा के पास की नदी (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

582

4) काळूस

580

581

583

577

576

575

574

573

569

524

स. नं. 524 और 568/अ के बीच का गाडी रस्ता

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

568/अ

567 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

566 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

565

564

563

562(गयरमेन्टलॅण्ड)

561

560

525

526

527

528

530

529

स. नं. 529 और 543 के बीच का कॅनाल (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

543

112

111

00 9680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

114

4) काळूस ( निरंतर )

110

109

108

105

106

104

115

103

102

101

100

स. नं . 96 और 52 के बीच का सरकारी जमीन (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

16 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

स. नं. 15 और 13 के बीच का कॅनाल (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. नं. 14 और 1898 के बीच का एम डी. आर . 20

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1898

1800 (गवरमेन्टलॅण्ड)

स. नं . 1800 और 2408 के बीच का वी . आर .

115 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

2408

2407

140

1880

1944

स. नं . 1944 और 1981 के बीच का फिल्ड चॅनल

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1981 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

2395

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3

00 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27 ,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

2394

4) काळूस ( निरंतर )

2393

2392

2391

2390

2387

2386

2384

2383

2380

2354

स. नं . 2354 और 1017 के बीच का रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1017

1019

1020

1023

1022

1027

1063 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1062

1061

1038

स. नं . 1038 और 1036 के बीच का गाडी रस्ता

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

1036

1037 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1039

1041 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1040

1042

1043

1044

1047

1045 (गवरमेन्टलॅण्ड)

1130 (गवरमेन्टलॅण्ड)

1131 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1132(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1133 (गवरमेन्टलॅण्ड)

स. नं. 1133 और 1134 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1134

1135

1136

1137 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1138

3606 GI/04-12

9681 3

02 00

50 00

03 00

85 00

84 00

61 00

93 00

67 00

50 00

24 00

31 00

20 00

76 00

84 00

71 00

59 00

94 00

39 00

89 00

04-

00 9682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

1139( गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड) 4) काळूस ( निरंतर )

1140

1149

1598(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 1598 और 1142 के बीच का रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

1142

1143

1596

1597

1722(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

1721

1720/1 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

स . नं . 1720 /1 और 1711 के बीच का सरकारी

जमीन

1711

1712

1713

1714

1748

1747

964

1746

1745

1744

1743

1741

1742

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00

26 00

76 00

53 00

75 00

37 00

32 00

50 00

49 00

81 00

76 00

20 00

97 00

85 00

94 00

17 00

84 00

58 00

88 00

53 00

95 00

00 00

33 00

39 00

29 00

95 00

60 00

स. नं . 1742 में कॅनाल (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

गाव सीमा के पास का ओडीआर- 32 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

401

5) वाकी बुदुक

400

399

स. नं . 399 और 398 के बीच का कॅनाल (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

398

397

402

396

393

391

492

389

387

390

59 00

73 00

71 00

49 00

53 00

40 00

66 00

95 00

92 00

47 00

30 00

53 00

50 00

40 00

32 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

520

5) वाकी बुदुक ( निरंतर )

519(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

517

518

514

696

700

701

713

714

715

719

720

727

726

724

731 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

730 (गंवरमेन्टलॅण्ड)

739

740

741

742

744

745

746

747

757

758

759

760

761

763

762

स. नं . 763 और 771 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

771

770

772

(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 772 और 775 के बीच की सरकारी जमीन 775

स. न . 775/ब और 782 के बीच का गाडी रस्ता

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

782

801/अ

801/ब (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

9683

00 9684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

2 5) वाकी बुदुक ( निरंतर )

स. न . 801 /ब और 803 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

803

806

807

808

811

810

स. नं . 810 और 813 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

813

815

865

864

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

08 00

52 00

49 00

64 00

75 00

18 00

49 00

45 00

93 00

49 00

39 00

98 00

स. नं. 864 और 863 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

863

856

862

867

गाव सीमा के पास की नदी (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

515

562

563

516

513

511

510

505

504

42 00

13 00

22 00

46 00

71 00

72 00

05 00

06 00

87 00

70 00

82 00

स. नं. 504 और 568 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

568

569

570

609

612

स. नं. 612 और 614 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

614

619

620

623

624

स. नं . 624 और 630 के बीच की सरकारी जमीन (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

630

.01

34 9685

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

634

5) वाकी बुदुक ( निरंतर )

635

684

688

687

689

लॅण्ड)

स. नं. 689 और 694 के बीध का नाला (क्रॉसिंग 694

स. न . 180 और 193 के बीच का नाला (क्रॉसिंग

6) वाकी खुर्द

लॅण्ड)

193

180

सर्वे नंबर 180पै और 180 के बीच में एन। एवं । 50

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

180

सर्वे नंबर 180 में नाला (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

179अ

सर्वे नंबर 179 पै । और गॉब सीमा के बीध में रोड

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

गाव सीमा के पास का रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड) 7) रोहकल्ल

103

109

108

220 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 220 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. न . 220 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

207

107

106

स. नं. 107 और 80 के बीच में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

51 00

74 00

04 00

77 00

50 00

18 00

91 00

74 00

10 00

91 00

105

25 00

9.2

13 00

81 00

94 00

11 00

73 00

00 00

54 00

00 00

75 9686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

7) रोहकल्ल ( निरंतर )

8) पिंपरी खुर्द

9) गोनवाडी

स. नं. 11 और 52 के बीच में नाला (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 52 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

52(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

53 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

51(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

799

10) आंबेठाण

798

723

722

721

719

717

718

स. नं . 718 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

687

688

689

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

76 00

48 00

10 00

72 00

71 00

48 00

30 00

83 00

31 00

56 00

58 00

76 00

13 00

14 00

88 00

33 00

26 00

39 00

74 00

97 00

37 00

13 00

01 00

59 00

02 00

34 00

54 00

60 00

12 00 .

04 00

54 00

75 00

82 00

08 00

58 00

44 00

30 00

50 00

20 00

79 00

82 00

52 00

20 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

534

10) आंबेठाण ( निरंतर )

533

536

537

538

539

540

541

542

543

544

578

579

580

615

611

610

812 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

794

786

531

532

624

621

620

619

616

529

530

614

गाव सीमा के पास का रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड) 11 ) कोरेगाव खुर्द

102(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

109

110

117

118

119

122

123

128

129

130

131

132

9687

00 9688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

133

11 ) कोरेगाव खुर्द ( निरंतर )

134

135

136

137

138

139

स. नं. 16 और 169 के बीच में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

170

171

174

169

262

261

264

263

340

331

330

169

12) शेलु

168 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

143

248

245(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

249 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

250 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

253

254

255

259

260

224

225

218

216

219

215

214

213

212

211

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

52.

79.

74 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

स . नं . 211 और 305 के बीच में नाला (क्रॉसिंग 12) शेलु ( निरंतर )

लॅण्ड)

303

305

306

302

307

308

316

309

310

315

314

312

स. नं. 314 और 336 के बीच में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

336 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

342 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

363 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

364 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

365 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

359 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

355

358

357

13) असखेड खुर्द

स. नं . 64 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅब्ड)

168

163

162

164

156

स. नं . 156 में एम . डी. आर . 17 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

157

3606 G1/04-13

9689

89 00

07.

00 9690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

230

14) करंजविहिरे

229

233

234

256

254

257

258

259

260

281

282

283

300 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड) मंडल: मावळ

जिल्हा: पुणे 1)मिडेवाडी

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 3

5 00

13 00

44 00

36 00

87 00

24 00

89 00

04 00

32 00

96 00

60 00

61 00

18 00

33 00

55 राज्य: महाराष्ट

गाव सीमा के पास सरकारी जमीन (गबरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

101

71 00

02 00

95 00

47 00

10 00

05 00

42 00

07 00

94 00

43 00

88 00

स. नं . 69 और 70 में रस्ता (कॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

179

2) बांदलवाडी

177

183

184

185

186

201

218

170

171

90 00

41 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

202

2) बादलवाडी ( निरंतर )

204

207

206

205

717

721

720

723

691

692

693

694

695

665

स. नं. 665 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. नं. 665 में रस्ता (कॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

648

644

578

577

568

575

569

570

556

555

540

539

538

537

536

स . नं. 536 और 512 सरकारी जमीन (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 536 और 512 सरकारी जमीन (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

512

760

3) नक्लाक उम्ब्रे

770

771

773

772

769

768

767

766

5 3

62 00

43 00

48 00

05 00

29 00

40 00

34 00

33 00

34 00

21 00

40 00

94 00

47 00

33 00

62 00

42 00

88 00

13 00

57 00

00 9692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

708

3) नवलाक उम्बे ( निरंतर )

707

709

720

721

719

717

718

716

630

539

556

555

577

578

579

580

581

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 3

5 00

09 00

69 00

67 00

61 00

40 00

22 00

50 00

25 00

45 00

73 00

14 00

76 00

42 00

00 00

47 00

57 00

07 00

स. नं. 580 में सरकारी जमीन (गयरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

स . नं . 580 में सरकारी जमीन (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

465 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

463

45 00

82 00

गाव सीमा के पास सरकारी जमीन (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

4) आंवळ

288

5) निगडे

287

303

295 ( गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

296

61 00

92 00

66 00

33 00

69 00

15 00

32 00

94 00

07 00

39 00

56 00

90 00

75 00

77 00

00 00

68 00

81 00

71 00

52 00

24 01

72 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

305

5) निगडे (निरंतर )

306

स. नं. 306 और 625 के बीच में नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

625

486

499

467

498

497

496

508

स. नं . 306 और 508 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

509

544

543

542

554

534

555

558

557

453

गाव सीमा के पास की सरकारी जमीन (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

6) पवलेवाडी

258

7.) कल्हाट

स. नं. 258 और 262 के बीच में नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

261

262

263

470

469

464

485

9693

00 9694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

500

7) कल्हाट ( निरंतर )

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

स. नं . 485 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

499

512

511

510

509

513

552

553

554

558

166

5) भोयरे

. न. 165 और 16 के बीच में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

20 (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

6वी

6ए

528

529

525

526

524

530

180

9) कशाल

179

181

184

210

स. नं. 210 और 209 के बीच में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

209

208

207

206

205

204

202

स. नं . 202 और 421 के बीच में नाला (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

421

44.

59 9695

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii)]

2 1

422

9) कशाळ (निरंतर )

423

424

404

403

402

400

399

383

384

390

385

391

10) किवळे

स. नं. 52 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 55 और 142 के बीच में नाला (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 55 और 142 के बीच में तालाब (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

142

143

144

140

139

138

137

141

स . नं. 141 और 134 के बीच में तालाब ( गवरमेन्ट

लॅण्ड)

134

135

133

132

131

130

174(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

11) इंगळून

47(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

47 00

26 00

70 00

O fi 00

46-

98 00

06 00

70 00

88 00

22 00

19 00

77 00

3/2

22 00

17 00

53 00

55 00

68 00

65 00

निरंतर 24 9696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

11) इंगळून ( निरंतर )

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

03 00

स. नं . 35 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

19ए

96 00

11 00

96 00

95 00

50 00

81 00

33 00

02 00

00 00

स. नं. 20, 330 और 18 बीच में तालाब (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

330

328

332

325

324

323

111

109

128

स. नं. 128 में नाला (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड )

153

152

160

159

156

158

157

163

164

167

165

247

244

स. नं. 244 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

245

240

242

238

236

227

स. नं. 236 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

229

02 00

48 00

70 00

28 00

43 00

66 00

41 00

55 00

21 00

59 00

52 00

97 00

52 00

64 00

60 00

19 00

31 00

78 00

04 00

46 00

26 00

72 00

40 00

94 00

35 00

50 00

10 00

16 00

66 00

27 00

00 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

स. नं. 48 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड) 12) कुणेवाडी

115

122

121

120

151 (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

148

149

150

152

172(गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 172 और 173 के बीच में तालाब (गवरमेन्ट

लॅण्ड)

आन्ध्रा लेक में नाला (क्रॉसिंग सैण्ड)

173

175

183

गाव सीमा के पास सरकारी जमीन (गवरमेन्ट लॅण्ड) 13) मालेगाव खुर्द

स. नं. 12 में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड )

स. नं . 20 में नाला (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

स. नं . 126 में नाला (क्रॉसिंग सैंण्ड) 14) पिंपरीवाडी

126

125

123

134

135

101

स. नं. 100 में माला (क्रॉसिंग मॅणा)

100

139

140

स. नं . 140 में नाली (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

141

142

145

144

143

3606 GI/04-14

9697

00 9698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

169 14) पिंपरीवाडी ( निरंतर)

222

171

221

215

216

220

218

109 15) मालेगाव बुदुक्

111

110

107

106

105 कॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

104

103

स. नं . 59 और 51 के बीच में तालाब (क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

178

179

134

*76

182

180

181

1.73

172

स. नं . 171 और 165 के बीच में सरकारी जमीन

(क्रॉसिंग लॅण्ड)

165

158

159

16) सावळे

97/3

97/2

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)) 3

5 00

75 00

46 00

83 00

65 00

72 00

11 00

15 00

48 00

40 00

88 00

21 00

12 00

38 00

60 00

42 00

19 00

00 01

94 00

87 00

32 00

10 00

68 00

40 00

46 00

43 00

18 00

02 00

22 00

32 00

17 १०

08 00

43 00

30 00

55 00

76 00

41 00

45 00

11 00

55 02

49 00

32 00

82 00

स. नं. 97/2 और 97/3 के बीच में रस्ता (क्रॉसिंग

लॅण्ड)

97/5

43 9699 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

118

16 ) सावळे ( निरंतर )

97/4

112

114

113

120/1

120/2

106

87/12

120/3

122

121

120/10

120/8

14 (गवरमेन्टलॅण्ड)

156

[फा. सं. एल-14014/50/2004-जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004

S. O. 3209.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the Natural Gras from exploration blocks in the Northern/ Southern offshore of Goa and structure in Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited , the promoter company of M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various Consumers of district Pune in the State of Maharashtra, Pipeline should be laid by M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas' it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user (ROU) in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.D.Bhise, Competent Authority , Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project , Rel Infecom , T/ 23 Telco Road, Near Gavali Matha, Opp MCCI & A, Bhosan, Pune 411026 , Maharashtra State .

9700

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

Schedule

Mandal: Khed

District: Pune

Village

Survey No./Sub-Division No.

2 1) Sablewadi

225

219

224

1514

State: Maharashtra

Area to be acquired for ROU Hectare

Are

C-Are 3

5 00

98 00

71 00

(OldNo.)

Cart Trackbet . Svy. No. 1514 (Old No.) & 220 (CROSSING LAND)

220

1412

55 00

57 00

(OldNo.)

1511

11 00

(Old No. )(209)

214

212

211

213

215

89 00

10 00

63 00

88 00

08 00

85 00

Nalabet . Svy. No. 215 & 13

(CROSSING LAND)

17/A

17/B

85 00

(GOVT LAND)

28 (GOVT LAND)

2) Bahul

415 (GOVT LAND)

Nala bet. Svy . No. 415 & Canal (CROSSING LAND).

69 00

Canal bet . Survey. No. 415 & 281

(CROSSING LAND)

281

282/2

(GOVT LAND)

Nala bet. Svy. No. 282/2 & 276

( CROSSING LAND)

276

275/A

275/B

CartTrackbet. Svy. No. 275/A & (CROSSING LAND)

275/B

274

256

1272

OldNo.

Nala bet. Svy. No. 1272

Old

No.& 284

(CROSSING LAND)

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

284

2) Bahul ( Contd .... )

Nala bet. Svy. No. 284 & 257 (CROSSING LAND)

267

255

254

253

Nalabet. Svy. No. 253 & 233 (CROSSING LAND)

CartTrackbet. Svy. No. 253 & 233 (CROSSING LAND)

233

1046

(OldNo.)

1048 (Old No.)

Nala bet. Svy. No. 1048 (Old No.) & 78 (CROSSING LAND)

765

(OldNo.)

1256

Roadbet. Svy. No. 1256 & 1257 (CROSSING LAND)

1257

Nala bet . Svy. No. 1257 & 530 (Old No. ) ( CROSSING LAND)

530(Old No.)

1029

1031

1030

Roadbet . Svy. No. 1030 & 1050/1 (CROSSING LAND)

1050

Nalabet , Svy. No. 1050/2 & 1054 (CROSSING LAND)

1054

Nala bet. Svy. No. 1054 & 1059 (CROSSING LAND)

1059

1058

961

Field Channel bet. Svy. No. 961 & 960 (CROSSING LAND)

960

959

1847

3) Pimpalgaon tarf Khed

1868

1864

Canalbet. Svy. No. 1864 & 1865 (CROSSING LAND)

1865

9701

5 3

43 00

01 00

99 00

44 00

29 00

36 00

63 00

03 00

38 00

08 00

40 00

65 00

99 00

67 00

07 00

68 00

45 00

35 00

87 00

51 00

49 00

35 00

00 4002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

1995

3) Pimpalgaon tarf Khed (Contd....)

1872

1858 (GOVT LAND)

1873

1874 (GOVT LAND)

1810

1876

1877

1878

1979 ( GOVT LAND)

1880

1881

1882

field Channel bet. Svy. No. 1881 & CROSSING LAND)

1882

1887

1889

Field Channel in Svy. No. 1889 (CROSSING LAND)

1890

1891

Canalbet. Svy. No. 1891 & 1892 (CROSSING LAND)

1892

Roadbet. Svy. No. 1892 & 1894 (CROSSING LAND)

1894 (GOVT LAND)

CartTrack in Svy . No. 1894 ( CROSSING LAND)

1912

1906

1902

1904

1903

1905

1907

1908

Nala bet. Svy. No. 1906 & 1972

(CROSSING LAND)

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1978

1979

1981

[PART II--SEC . 3( ii) ] 3

5 00

22 00

25 00

55 00

21 00

90 00

39 00

13 00

89 00

44 00

43 00

25 00

39 00

70 00

15 00

98 00

37 00

24 00

91 00

07 00

30 00

01 00

78 00

88 00

33 00

37 00

36 00

40 00

00 00

20 00

50 00

00 9703

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

1982

3) Pimpalgaon tarf Khed (Contd.... )

Field Channel bet. Svy. No. 1978 & 1982 (CROSSING LAND)

Field Channel bet . Svy. No. 1978 & 1982 (CROSSING LAND)

1983

1999

1959

1958

1957

1956

1955

1946

1952/1

Canal bet . Svy . No. 1952/1 & Road (CROSSING LAND)

Road bet . Svy. No. 1952/1 & 1744/1 (CROSSING LAND)

1744

1580

FieldChannel bet. Svy. No. 1744 & (CROSSING LAND)

1743

1580

1582

1581

Nala bet. Svy. No. 1581 & 1583

(CROSSING LAND)

1583

1584

1579

1586

1587

1589

1590/1

1590/2

1591

1592

1593

1594 (GOVT LAND)

394/1

394/2

393/1B

393/1A (GOVT LAND)

Canalbet . Svy. No. 393/1A & 393/2 (CROSSING LAND)

393/2

386

388

5 00

11 00

55 00

50 00

24 00

10 00

79 00

00 00

36 00

73 00

26 00

82 00

13 00

99 00

05 00

59 00

54 00

44 00

33 00

40 00

48 00

66 00

48 00-

74 00

53 0704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

385/1B

3) Pimpalgaon tarf Khed (Contd....)

385/2

385/1A

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00

48 00

57 00

(GOVT LAND)

384

383

382

363/2

363/4

23 00

03 00

16 00

38 00

(GOVT LAND)

363/3

359

360

357

361

356

354

70 00

37 00

10 00

17 00

81 00

80 00

47 00

49 00

Roadbet . Svy . No. 354 & 170/2

(CROSSING LAND)

170/2 (GOVT LAND)

171

172/A

172/B

173

174

175

87 00

92 00

96 00

08 00

42 00

56 00

82 00

Nala bet. Svy. No. 175 & 176

(CROSSING LAND)

176

164

191

192

193

195

196

197

198

210

199

211

212

231

230

232

235

236

237

68 00

48 00

82 00

33 00

13 00

20 00

70 00

35 00

23 9705

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

249

3) Pimpalgaon tarf Khed (Contd....)

250

258

257

226

255

254-

253

252

251

RiveratV. B. (CROSSING LAND)

582

4) Kalus

580

581

583

577

576

575

574

573

569

524

CartTrackbet. Svy. No. 524 & 568 /A (CROSSING LAND)

568/A

567 (GOVT LAND)

566 (GOVT LAND)

565

564

563

562 (GOVT LAND)

561

560

525

526

527

528

530

529

Canal bet . Svy. No. 529 & 543 (CROSSING LAND)

543

112

111

114

5 3

58 00

74 00

82 00

64 00

24 00

00 00

25 00

51 00

88 00

97 00

75 00

09 00

53 00

00 9706

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

2 1

110

4) Kalus (Contd .... )

109

108

105

106

104

115

103

102

101

100

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

00 88

Govt. Land Bet. Svy. No. 96 & 52

(CROSSING LAND)

-58

(GOVT LAND)

Canal bet . Svy: No. 15 & 13

(CROSSING LAND)

MDR-20bet. Svy. No. 14 & 1898

(CROSSING LAND)

1898

1800 (GOVT LAND) 00

VR-115 bet. Svy. No. 1800 & 2408

(CROSSING LAND)

2408

2407

140

1880

1944

1981

FieldChannel bet. Svy. No. 1944 &

(CROSSING LAND)

1981

(GOVT LAND)

2395

2394,

60 9707

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

2393

4) Kalus (Contd.... )

2392

2391

2390

2387

2386

2384

2383

2380

2354

Roadbet . Svy. No. 2354 & 1017

(CROSSING LAND)

1017

1019

1020

1023

1022

1027

1063 (GOVT LAND)

1062

1061

1038

CartTrackbet. Svy. No. 1038 &

1036 (CROSSING LAND)

1036

1037 (GOVT LAND)

1039

1041 (GOVT LAND)

1040

1042

1043

1044

1047

1045 (GOVT LAND)

1130 (GOVT LAND)

1131 (GOVT LAND)

1132 (GOVT LAND)

1133 (GOVT LAND)

Nalabet . Svy. No. 1133 & 1134

(CROSSING LAND)

1134

1135

1136

1137 (GOVT LAND)

1138

1139 (GOVT LAND)

1140

5 3

50 00

03 00

36 00

84 00

61 00

93 00

50 00

10 00

18 00

48 00

31 00

20 00

75 00

71 00

84 00

79. 00

37 00

18 00

39 00

72 00

26 00

00 9708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

1149

4) Kalus (Contd.... )

1598

ĮPART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) | 3

5 00

(GOVT LAND)

75 00

Roadbet . Svy . No. 1598 & 1142

(CROSSING LAND)

1142

1143

1596

1597

37 00

32 00

50 00

49 00

1722

(GOVT LAND)

1721

76 00

1720/1 (GOVT LAND)

97 00

Govt. Land Bet . Svy . No. 1720/1 &

1711

1712

1713

1714

1748

1747

964

1746

1745

1744

1743

1741

1742

Canal in Svy . No. 1742 (CROSSING LAND)

85 00

94 00

17 00

84 00

58 00

88 00

53 00

95 00

00 00

33 00

39 00

29 00

95 00

60 00

69 00

ODR-32atV. B.

(CROSSING

LAND)

401

5) Waki budurk

400

399

59 00

73 00

71 00

Canal bet . Svy. No. 399 & 398

(CROSSING LAND)

398

397

402

396

393

394

391

492

389

387

390

520

519

49 00

53 00

(GOVT LAND)

36 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

517

5) Waki budurk ( Contd .... )

518

514

696

700

701

713

714

715

719

720

727

726

724

731 (GOVT LAND)

730 (GOVT LAND)

739

740

741

742

744

745

746

747

757

758

759

760

761

763

762

Nala bet. Svy . No. 763 & 771 (CROSSING LAND)

771

770

772

Govt. Landbet . Svy. No. 772 & 775

(GOVT LAND)

775

Cart Trackbet . Svy . No. 775/B & 782 (CROSSING LAND)

782

801/A

801/B (GOVT LAND)

Nala bet . Svy. No. 801 /B & 803 (CROSSING LAND)

803.

9709

5 3

90 00

63 00

54 00

64 00

07-

39 00

81 00

23 00

95 00

06 00

00 9710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

806

5) Waki budurk ( Contd .... )

807

808

811

810

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

Nala bet. Svy. No. 810 & 813

(CROSSING LAND)

813

815

865

864

Nalabet. Svy . No. 864 & 863

(CROSSING LAND)

863

856

862

867

River at V. В.

(CROSSING

LAND)

515

562

563

516

513

511

510

505

504

Nala bet . Svy. No. 504 & 568

(CROSSING LAND)

568

569

570

609

612

Nala bet . Svy . No. 612 & 614 (CROSSING LAND)

614

615

619

620

623

624

36.

Govt. Landbet . Svy. No. 624 & 630

(CROSSING LAND)

630

634

635

10-

51 9711

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

684

5) Waki budurk (Contd .... )

688

687

689

Nalabet. Svy. No. 689 & 694 (CROSSING LAND)

694

6)Waki khurd

Nalabet. Svy. No. 180 & 193 (CROSSING LAND)

193

180P

N.H. -50 Bet Svy No 180P & 180 (CROSSING LAND)

180

Nala in Svy.No 180 (CROSSING

LAND)

179A

Roadin Bet Svy No. 180P & 180 (CROSSING LAND) 7) Rohakkal

Road atVillageBoundary (CROSSING LAND)

103

109

108

220 (CROSSING LAND)

Road in Svy . No. 220 (CROSSING LAND)

Road in Svy. No. 220 (CROSSING LAND)

207

107

106

Roadbet . Svy . No. 107 & 80 (CROSSING LAND)

5 00

08 00

04 00

48 00

77 00

50 00

40 00

18 00

74 00

10 00

05 00

25 00

92 00

48 00

13 00

16 00

35 01

94 00

73 00

12 00

06 00

54 00

47 00

02 00

27 00

14 00

75 9712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

2 1

7) Rohakkal ( Contd ....)

8) Pimprikhurd

9) Gonawadi

Nala bet. Svy. No. 11 & 52 (CROSSING LAND) Road in Svy. No.52 (CROSSING LAND)

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

(CROSSING LAND)

799

10) Ambethan

798

723

722

721

719

717

718

Road in Svy. No. 718 (CROSSING LAND )

687

688

52 9713

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

689

10) Ambethan (Contd .... )

534

533

536

537

538

539

540

541

542

543

544

578

579

580

815

611

610

812

20 00

50 00

10 00

00 00

50 00

25 00

38 00

03 00

63 00

05 00

70 00

00 00

02 00

(CROSSING LAND)

794

786

531

532

624

621

620

619

616

529

530

614

11) Koregaonkhurd

75 00

00 00

75 00

05- 00

44 00

69 00

85 00

Road atV. B. (CROSSING

LAND)

61 00

(CROSSING LAND)

102

109

110

117

118

119

122

123

128

129

130

131

132

3606G1/04-16

10 00

67 00

35 00

46 00

00 9714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

2 1

133

11 ) Koregaonkhurd

(Contd....)

134

135

136

137

138

139

Roadbet. Svy. No. 16 & Svy.

No.169

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 3

5 00

05 00

11.

85 00

32 00

05 00

74 00

48 00

14 00

22 00

26 00

56 00

(CROSSING LAND)

170

171

174

169

262

261

264

263

340

331

330

169

12) Shelu

168

10 00

89 00

57 00

04 00

68 00

04 00

62 00

75 01

66 00

00/

98 00

48 01

(CROSSING LAND)

143

248

245

35 00

81 00

25 00

(GOVT LAND)

249

33 00

(GOVT LAND)

250

47 00

(GOVT LAND)

253

254

255

259

260

224

225

218

100

216

00219

0215

00214

00213

on212

00211

00 00

79 00

72 00

52 00

87 00

15 00

09 00

01 00

99 00

24 00

28 200

92 0100

61 004.

100

83 58:00

74 9715

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

2 1

12) Shelu (Contd....)

Nala bet. Svy. No. 211 & 305 (CROSSING LAND)

303.

305

306

302

307

308

316

309

310

315

314

312

Roadbet. Svy. No. 314 &338 (CROSSING LAND)

336 (CROSSING LAND)

342 (CROSSING LAND)

363 (CROSSING LAND)

364 (CROSSING LAND)

365 (CROSSING LAND)

359 (CROSSING LAND)

355

358

357

13) Ashkedkhurd

Road in Svy. No. 64 (CROSSING LAND)

158

163

162

164

156

MDR-17 in Svy. No. 156 (CROSSING LAND)

157

4( 1 01

00.

shed (S

34.

94 9716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

2 1

230

14) Karanjavihire

229

233

234

256

254

257

258

259

260

281

282

283

300

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii ) ]

00.

(GOVT LAND)

Mandal : Maval

District : Pune 1) Midewadi

State: Maharashtra

Govt. Land at V. B.

(GOVT

LAND)

101

Road in Svy . No. 69 & 70 (CROSSING LAND)

179

2) Badalwadi

177

183

184

185

186

195

199

200

217

201

218

170

171

07.

57.

14.

41 9717

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

202

2) Badalwadi ( Contd.... )

204

207

206

205

717

721

720

723

691

692

693

694

695

665

Road in Svy.No. 665 (CROSSING LAND) Road in Svy. No. 665 (CROSSING LAND)

648

644

578

577

568

575

569

570

556

555

540

539

538

537

536

Govt. Landbet .Svy.No. 536 & 512 (CROSSING LAND)

Govt. Land bet Svy.No. 536 & 512 (CROSSING LAND)

512

760

3) Navalakh- Umbre

770

771

773

772

769

768

767

5 00

62 00

43 00

48 00

12 00

19- 00

07 00

05 00

40 00

23 00

34 00

33 00

34 00

14 00

08 00

60 00

30, 00

73 00

21 00

24 00

40 00

94 00

47 00

58 00

62 00

68 00

13 00

08 00

70 00

38 00

23 00

13 9718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

2 1

766

3) Navalakh - Umbre (Contd....)

708

707

709

720

721

719

717

718

716

560

559

556

555

577

578

579

580

581

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

Govt. Land in Svy. No. 580

(GOVT LAND)

Govt. Land in Svy. No. 580

(GOVT LAND)

465

(CROSSING LAND)

463

Govt. Land at V. B. ( GOVT

LAND)

4)Amble

288

5) Nigade

287

303

75.

56.

52 9719

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

(GOVT LAND)

295

5) Nigade(Contd .... )

296

305

306

Nalabet. Svy. No. 306 & 625 (CROSSING LAND)

625

486

499

487

498

497

496

508

Road bet . Svy. No. 306 & 508 (CROSSING LAND)

509

544

543

542

554

534

555

558

557

453

Govt . Land at V. B. (GOVT 6) Pawalewadi

LAND)

258

7) Kalhat

Nala bet. Survey. No.258 & 262 (CROSSING LAND)

261

262

263

470

469

5 00

24 01

72 01

43 00

35 00

96 00

78 00

63 00

30 00

10 00

81 00

29 00

22 00

77 00

53 00

57 00

34 00

20 00

93 01

25 00

84 00

37 00

25 00

00 00

98 00

48 00

91 00

17 00

36 00

29 00

43 00

81 00

10 00

33 00

58 00

64 00 9720

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

2 1

484

7) Kalhat ( Contd .... )

485

500

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 3

5 00

41 00

47 00

15 00

Road inSvy . No. 485

(CROSSING LAND)

499

512

511

510

509

513

552

553

554

558

166

8) Bhoyare

12 00

56 00

37 00

57 00

00 00

21 00

74 00

26 00

39 00

40 00

98 00

Roadbet . Svy. No. 165 & 16

(CROSSING LAND)

40 00

89 00

44 00

(GOVT LAND)

528

529

525

526

524

530

180

9) Kashal

179

181

184

210

93 00

35 00

82 00

72 00

78 00

70 00

36 00

47 00

56 00

10 00

42 00

45 00

10 00

98 00

44 00

10 00

37 00

Roadbet . Svy.No. 210 & 209

( CROSSING LAND)

209

208

207

206

205

204

202

60 00

44 00

66 00

49 00

48 00

38 00

59 9721

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

9) Kashal (Contd .... )

Nala bet. Svy. No. 202 & 421 (CROSSING LAND)

421

422

423

424

404

403

402

400

399

383

384

390

385

391

10) Kivale

Road in Svy. No. 52 (CROSSING LAND)

5 00

29 00

59 00

09 00

47 00

15 00

45 00

26 00

60 00

70 00

66 00

48 00

65 00

06 00

98 00

96 00

06 00

46 00

14 00

20 ! 00

55& 142

Nala in Bet. Svy.No. (CROSSING LAND)

Pond in Bet .Svy. No. 55& 142 (CROSSING LAND)

142

143

144

140

139

138

137

141

Pondbet . Svy. No. 141 & 134

(GOVT LAND)

134

135

133

132

131

130

174 (GOVT LAND) 3606G1/04-17

70 00

56 00

44 00

88 00

22 00

19 00

77 00

32 00

22 00

45 00

18 00

33 00

53 00

24 9722

DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27. 1976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA

2 1

11) Ingalun

47 (GOVT LAND)

Road in Svy. No. 35 ( CROSSING LAND)

19A

Pond in Svy. No. 20, 330 & 18 ( CROSSING LAND)

330

328

332

325

324

323

111

109

128

Nala in Svy . No. 128 ( CROSSING LAND)

153

152

160

159

156

158

157

163

164

167

165

247

244

Road in Svy. No. 244 (CROSSING LAND)

245

240

PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

10 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

242

11) Ingalun ( Contd.... )

238

236

227

Road in Svy. No. 236 (CROSSING LAND)

229

12) Kunewadi

Road in Svy. No 48 (CROSSING LAND)

115

122

121

120

151 (CROSSING LAND)

148

149

150

152

172 (GOVT LAND)

Pondbet. Svy. No. 172 & 173 (GOVT LAND)

Nala in Andhra Lake (CROSSING LAND)

173

175

183

13) Malegaon-khurd

Govt. Land at V. 8 . (GOVT LAND)

Road in Svy. No. 12 (CROSSING LAND)

Nala in Svy. No. 28 (CROSSING LAND)

14) Pimpriwadi

Nala in Svy. No. 126 (CROSSING LAND)

126

125

123

134

135

101

Nala in Svy. No. 100 (CROSSING LAND)

100

9723 3

16 00

58 00

00 00

40 00

78 00

18 00

80 00

10 00

62 00

45 00

64 00

10 00

98 01

80 00

74 00

12 00

92 00

01 00

91 00

30 00

77 00

17 00

53 00

01 00

43 00

30 00

61 9724

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27. 1976

139

14) Pimpriwadi (Contd ....)

140

Nala in Svy. No. 140 (CROSSING LAND)

141

142

145

144

143

169

222

171

221

215

216

220

218

109

15) Malegaon-budruk

111

110

107

106

105

PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) | 3

(CROSSING LAND)

104

103

Pond bet. Survey. No. 59 & 51.

(CROSSING LAND)

178

179

184

176

182

180

181

173

172

171

Govt . Landbet . Svy . No. 171 & 165

(CROSSING LAND)

165

158

159

41 9725

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

16) Savle

97/3

97/2

5 00

11 00

49 00

32 00

82 00

Roadbet. Survey. No. 97/2 & 97/3

(CROSSING LAND)

97/5

118

97/4

112

114

113

120/1

120/2

106

87/12

120/3

122

121

120/10

120/8

14 (GOVT LAND)

156

30 00

96 00

26 00

02 00

81 00

54 00

40 00

94 00

56 00

99 00

76 00

[F. No. L- 14014/50/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर , 2004

का. आ. 3210.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए जामनगर - भोपाल और काकीनाडा- हैदराबाद- गोवा पाइपलाइन को आंपस में जोड़ने के लिए मैसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है । और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख में जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा ( 3 ) की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री ए. के. संघवी , मक्षम प्राधिकारी, जी.टी. आई.सी. एल. पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना, तीसरी मंजिल , एटलांटा टावर , इन्कलाब सोसायटी के मामने गुलवाई टेकरा , एलिसब्रिज - अहमदाबाद -380006 , गुजरात राज्य को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

अनुसूची तालुका: पादरा

जिला: वडोदस गांव कानाम

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ) राज्य: गुजरात

आर ओ आर्जत करने केलि

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वेनंबर

2 1- दनोली

329/ब

341

342

कच्चा रास्ता

हेक्टर

आरे स्केरमी.

(सर्वे नं. 341 और 340 के बीच मे)

340/ब

345

346

312

311

नाला

(सर्वे नं. 311 और 308 के बीच मे )

308

307

305

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं. 305 और 306 के बीच मे)

306

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं. 306 और 391 के बीच मे)

391

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 391 और 387 के बीच मे )

393

387

399/अ

386/ब

386/अ

नहर

62.

(सर्वे नं. 386 और 385 के बीच मे)

385

384/अ

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं . 384 और गांव की हद के बीच मे)

2- सांपला

794

801

802

804

791/अ

791/ब

789

788

783

785

पक्की सङक

(सर्वे नं. 785 और 738 के बीच मे)

738

नाला

(सर्वे नं . 738 और 819 के बीच मे )

819

24 9727

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27 ,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

820

सांपला (निरंतर)

821

879

822

878

880

877

881

876

874/ब

कच्चा रास्ता

5 3

09 00

95 00

(सर्वे नं. 874 और 849 के बीच मे)

849

नहर

(सर्वे नं. 849 और 850 के बीच मे)

850

859

858

855

854

853

कच्चा रास्ता

99 00

(सर्वे नं. 853 और 554 के बीच मे)

553

554

550

556

545

557

544

543

74 00

(सर्वे नं. 543 और 288 के बीच मे)

पक्की सङक

288

289

348

347

345

346

349

350

344

343

341

338

339

368

336

369

371

330

(सरकारी जमीन-गौचर )

372

(सरकारी जमीन- यौचर )

374

नाला

( गांव की हद और सर्वे नं. 208 के बीच मे )

3- अभोर

(सरकारी जमीन- गौचर )

208

50 00

60 00

59 00

08 00

00 9728

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

2 अभोर (निरंतर)

226

220

221

219

218

217

210

211

कच्चा रास्ता

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

(सर्वे नं . 211 और 57 के बीच मे)

(सरकारी जमीन-तालाव)

61/ब

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं . 61/B और 61 /A के बीच मे)

61/अ

27/अप / 1

26/प

सरकारी - जमीन

(सर्वे नं. 26 और 25 के बीच मे )

छोटी नहर

(सर्वे नं. 26 और 24 के बीच मे)

24/प1

रेलवे

(सर्वे नं. 27 और 762 के बीच मे)

कच्चा रास्ता

( सर्वे नं. 27 और 762 के बीच मे)

762

761

763

764

765

706

704

703

702

कच्चा रास्ता ( सर्वे नं . 702 और 661 के बीच मे )

661

662

663

665/अ

665/ब

666

655

653

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 653 और 554 के बीच मे)

554

555

557

22 9729

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

कच्चा रास्ता

5 3

(सर्वे नं. 557 और 560 के बीच मे )

अभोर (निरंतर)

558

559

560/अ

605

606

( सरकारी जमीन )

607

609

633

610

611

613

632

614

616

615

627

(सरकारी जमीन )

628

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं. 627 और गांव की हद के बीच में )

806

4- कुराल

807

812

811

813

810

809

820

कच्चा रास्ता

41 00

57 00

76 00

(सर्वे नं. 820 और 9 के बीच मे )

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 26 और 43 के बीच मे)

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 38 और 62 के बीच मे )

( सर्वे नं . 62 और 61 के बीच मे)

पक्की सडक- एस.एच -6

नाला

(सर्वे नं. 59 और गांव की हद के बीच में )

3606 G1/04-18

00 9730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

2 5- मासर

नाला

( गांव की हद और सर्वे नं. 48 के बीच मे)

छोटी नहर - सरदार सरोवर ( सर्वे नं . 48 और 49 के बीच में )

कच्चा रास्ता

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

(सर्वे नं . 67 और 69 के बीच में )

पक्की सङक (सर्वे नं . 71 और गांव की हद के बीच में )

6-गामेठा

375

376

376/ब

377

378

381

380

382

416

383

395

396

411

413

कच्चा रास्ता

00:

04/ 46

(सर्वे नं. 413 और 410 के बीच में )

410

408

407

400

406

401

402

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 402 और 202 के बीच में )

305

(सरकारी जमीन-तालाब )

202

204

194

191/अ

192

185

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं. 185 और 63 के बीच में )

66/ ब

06 9731

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड.3 ( ii) ]

2 1

गामेठा (निरंतर)

110

111

5 3

29 00

62 00

27 00

33 00

81 00

49 00

77 00

(सर्वे नं. 111 और 115 के बीच में )

नहर - सरदार सरोवर

115

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं. 115 और 754 के बीच में )

754

753

752

751

750/ब

740

739

( गांव की हद और सर्वे नं. 597 के बीच मे)

कच्चारास्ता

7- मजातन

597

598

कच्चा रास्ता

12 00

37 00

29 00

91 00

98 00

(सर्वे नं. 598 और 596 के बीच में )

596

(सर्वे नं. 598 और 599 के बीच में )

नहर -सरदार सरोवर

592

599

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 592 और 602 के बीच में )

602

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 602 और 563 के बीच में )

563

560

561

562

कच्चा रास्ता

62 00

85 00

(सर्वे नं. 562 और 559 के बीच में )

559

545

548

546

547

543

542

पक्की सङ्क (सर्वे नं. 540 में )

कच्चा रास्ता (सर्वे नं. 540 में)

(सरकारी जमीन-तालाब )

540

कच्चारास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 540 और 619 के बीच में )

619

624

625

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं. 625 और 634 के बीच में )

9732

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

2 मजातन (निरंतर)

634

636

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

(सरकारी जमीन )

635

631

640

641

642

नहर -सरदार सरोवर

(सर्वे नं. 642में )

644

645

646

648

नहर -सरदार सरोवर

(सर्वे नं. 648 में )

8- करखडी

241

200

नहर

(सर्वे नं . 200 में )

199

198

196

197

195

205

204

228

227

226

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं. 226 और 215 के बीच में )

215

225

216

पक्की सङक

(सर्वे नं. 216 और 170 के बीच में )

170

169

164

168

165

9- चौकारी

कच्चा रास्ता ( गांव की हद और सर्वे नं. 845 के बीच मे)

845

684

685

नहर

(सर्वे नं. 846 और 829 के बीच में )

829

828

827

पक्की सङक

(सर्वे नं . 827 में )

नाला

(सर्वे नं. 827 में )

826

824

823

822

821

820

14 9733

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

819

चौकारी (निरंतर)

816

812

810

809

कच्चा रास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 809 और 805 के बीच में )

805

803

802

801

795/ब

795/अ

796

794

कच्चारास्ता

(सर्वे नं . 794 और 1166 के बीच में )

1166

1167

1165

1172

1174

1173

1175

1176

1177

1154

1185

(सरकारी जमीन )

564

(सरकारी जमीन )

403

10-पावडा

(सरकारी जमीन )

806

11- डबका

नदी

(मही नदी)

39 00

[फा. सं. एल-14014/35/2004-जी.पी. ] एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004

S. O. 3210. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through an interconnection between Jamnagar Bhopal and Kakinada Hyderabad-Goa pipeline , a pipeline should be laid by M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the sold pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50. of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of section (3 ) of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri A.K.Sanghavi, Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project , Atlanta Tower , 3rd Floor. Opp Inqulab Society, Gulbai Tekra, Ellisbridge , Ahmedabad - 380 006, Gujarat .

9734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

SCHEDULE Taluka : Padra

District : Vadodara

SurveyNo.

Nameof the Village

2 1.DANOLI

329-B

341

342

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 341 & 340 )

340/B

345

346

312

311

Nala (In between Survey No. 311 & 308 )

308

307

305

Metalled Road (In between Survey No. 305 & 306)

306

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 306 & 391 )

391

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 391 & 387)

393

387

399/A

386/B

386/A

Canal (In between Survey No. 386 & 385)

385

384A

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 384 & VB )

2. SAMPLA

794

801

802

804

791/A

791/B

789

788

783

785

Asphalted Road (In between Survey No. 785 & 738)

738

Nala (In between Survey No. 738 & 819)

819

820

821

879

822

878

880

PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] State: Gujarat Hectare

Area to be aequrud AreROUS Sq.Mtr. 3

52 00

50 9735

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

877

SAMPLA ( Cont'd)

881

876

874/B

Carttrack

00 00

(Inbetween Survey No. 874 & 849)

849

Canal

31 00

(In between Survey No. 849 & 850 )

850

859

858

855

854

853

Carttrack

99 00

66 00

65 00

43 00

49 00

(Inbetween Survey No. 853 & 554)

553

554

550

556

545

557

544

543

Asphalted Road ( In between Survey No. 543 & 288)

288

289

348

347

345

346

349

350

344

343

341

338

339

368

336

369

371

330

(Govt. Land - Gauchar)

372

374 (Govt. Land -Gauchar)

Stream

58 00

40 00

83 00

81 00

83 00

25 00

50 00

42 00

40 00

59 00

08 00

83 00

(In between VB & Survey No. 208 )

3.ABHOR

208

(Govt. Land - Gauchar)

226

220

221

219.

218

217

210

211

Carttrack

00 00

40 00

74 00

(Inbetween Surevey No. 211 & 57)

00 9736

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

ABHOR ( Cont'd)

(Govt. Land - Pond)

61/B

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 61 /B & 61 /A)

61/A

27A/P1

26P

Govt. Land (In between Survey No. 26 & 25 )

Minor Canal ( In between Survey No. 26 & 24)

24/P1

Railway Line ( In between Survey No. 27 & 762)

Carttrack ( In between Survey No. 27 & 762)

762

761

763

764

765

706

704

703

702

Carttrack ( In between Survey No. 702 & 661 )

661

662

663

665/A

665/B

666

655

653

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 653 & 554 )

554

555

557

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 557 & 560)

558

559

560/A

605

606

607

24.

93 00

34 00

32 00

73 00

14 00

54 00

96 00

37 00

26 00

32 00

21 00

44 00

50 00

90 00

98 00

78 00

63 00

44 00

76 00

18 00

36 00

42 00

66 00

(Govt. Land)

609

633

610

611

613

632

614

616

90 00

19 00

61 00

81 00

39 00

17 00

41 9737

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

615

ABHOR (Cont'd)

627

628 (Govt. Land)

Carttrack

(In between Survey No. 627 & VB)

606

4.KURAL

807

612

611

613

610

609

820

Carttrack

65 00

69 00

48 00

50 00

83 00

16 00

(In between Survey No. 620 &9)

Carttrack

67 00

93 00

(In between Survey No. 26 & 43)

Carttrack

88 00

(Inbetween-Survey No. 38 & 62)

( In between Survey No. 82 & 61 )

Aspalted Road

01 00

32. 00

34 00

(In between Survey No. 59 & VB )

Nala

86 00

(In between VB & Survey No. 48A)

5.MASAR

84 00

(In between Survey No. 48 &49)

Canal (SSNL)

Carttrack

62 00

(In between Survey No. 67 & 69)

54.

10 89 00

( In between Survey No. 71 & VB )

Aspalted Road

375

8. GAMETHA

376

376/B

360601.04-19

00 9738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

377

GAMETHA ( Cont'd)

378

381

380

382

416

383

395

396

411

413

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 413 & 410)

410

408

407

400

406

401

402

Carttrack ( In between Survey No. 402 & 202)

305

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ]

(Govt. Land - Pond)

202

204

194

191/A

192

185

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 185 & 63 )

66/B

110

Car

between Survey No. 111 & 115)

115

Cart tra inwen Survey No. 115 & 754)

754

753

752

751

750/B

740

739

7. MAJATAN

Carttrack ( in between VB & Survey No. 597)

29 9739

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

597

MAJATAN( Cont'd)

598

Carttrack

5 3

(In between Survey No. 598 & 596)

596

91 00

( In between Survey No. 598 & 599)

Canal ( SSNL)

592

599

Carttrack

78 00

40 00

(Inbetween Survey No. 592 & 602 )

602

Carttrack

(In between Survey No. 602 & 563 )

563

560

561

562

Carttrack

62 00

85 00

61 00

84 00

(Inbetween Survey No. 562 & 559)

559

545

548

546

547

543

542

(In Survey No. 540)

Asphalted Road

Carttrack (InSurvey No. 540)

540 (Govt. Land - Pond)

Carttrack

08 00

29 00

(In between Survey No. 540 & 619)

619

624

625

Carttrack

72 00

96 00

(In between Survey No. 625 & 634)

634

636 (Govt. Land)

635

631

640

641

642

( In Survey No. 642)

Canal (SSNL)

644

645

646

648

( InSurvey No 648 )

Canal ( SSNL)

241

8.KARKHADI

200

Canal (InSurvey No. 200)

199

198

196

197

195

205

204

228

227

91 00

46 00

51 00

69 00

53 00

64 00

90 00

9740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

226

KARKHADI (Cont'd)

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 226 & 215)

215

225

216

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 3

5 00

06 00

77 00

41 00

25 00

Asphalted Road ( In between Survey No. 218 & 170)

170

169

164

168

165

9. CHOKARI

Carttrack (In between VB & Survey No. 845)

845

684

685

Canal (In between Survey No. 848 & 829 )

829

828

827

Asph.Road

50 00

47 00

62 00

05 00

58 00

68 00

28 00

10 00

86 00

28 00

56 00

44 00

66 00

(In Survey No. 827 )

Nala

57 00

(In Survey No. 827)

826

824

823

822

821

820

819

816

812

810

809

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 809 & 805 )

805

803

802

801

795/B

795/A

796

794

Carttrack (In between Survey No. 794 & 1166)

1166

1167

1165

1172

1174

1173

1175

1176

1177

1154

1185

564

(Govt. Land) 10. PAVDA

403

(Govt. Land)

87 00

69 00

92 00

74 00

30 00

14 00

25 00

52 00

01 00

71 00

33 00

71 00

18 00

37 00

53 00

08 00

55 00

50 00

26 00

76 00

80 00

46 00

34 00

79 00

82 00

18 00

39 00

31 00

57 00

55 00

38 07

41 01

36 9741 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5 11. DABKA

50 03

07 01

94 46 806 River

(Govt. Land) (Mahi River)

[ F. No. L-14014/35/2004-G :P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3211.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुचिव , मदुराई और शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962( 1962 का 50 )की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शतिक्यों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति उस तारीख से , जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रति लिखित रूप में आक्षेप श्री आर. वज्रवेलू, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , चेम्जई-तिरुचिव मदुराई उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना और आसनूर से शंकरी तक ब्रांच पाइपलाइन परियोजना , 4/2, आरोक्यसामी स्ट्रीट, काफोर्ड कालोनि, तिरुचिराप्पल्ली -620 012 , (तमिलनाडू) को कर सकेगा । 9742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

अनुसूची

तालूका: तिरुच्चिराप्पल्ली

जिला: तिरुच्चिराप्पल्ली

राज्य: तमिलनाडु गॉव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

हिस्सा नंबर

हेक्टर

आर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 नं . 76. सुरियूर

697

1अ

697

1ब

[फा. सं. आर-25011/29/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th December, 2004

S. O. 3211.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Trichy , Madurai and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And , whereas , it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act.1962( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . R.Vajravelu , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Chennai- Trichy -Madurai Product Pipeline Project with a branch pipeline from Asanur to Sankari , 4/2, Arockiasamy Street, Crawford Colony, Tiruchirappalli -620 012, Tamilnadu .

9743 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अंग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

State : TAMILNADU

District : TIRUCHIRAPALLI

Taluk : TIRUCHIRAPALLI

Area

Sub-Division No.

Survey No.

Name of the Village

Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

NO.76.SURIYUR

697

[No.R -25011/29/2004- O.R. -I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर , 2004

उक्त का. आ. 3212.- केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) ( जिसे इसमें अधिनियम कहा गया है)की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय 23 , जुलाई , 2004 द्वारा , तमिलनाडु राज्य में आसनूर से शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी । (भूमि में उपयोग के इसके पश्चात भारत सरकार के की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 1736 ,तारीख चेन्नई से तिरुच्चिराप्पल्ली होकर मदुराई तक और और उक्त अधिसूना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 23.08.2004 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केंद्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केंद्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।

और केंद्रीय सरकार ,उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का योग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केंद्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 9744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18. 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

अनुसूची

PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

जिला: सेलम

तालूका: संकरि

गॉव का नाम

राज्य: तमिलनाडु

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर

हिस्सा नंबर 1

634

2 नं. 21 मोटूर

633

632

610

4अ

610

1132

611

610

1131

610

7ब

610

731

610

732

613

1131

613

11ब 1

613

615

613

617

1ब

617

2अ

617

1अ

623

1अ

623

1 ब

623

2अ हेक्टर

आर वर्ग मीटर 4

6 0

85 0

10 0

37 0

39 0

27 0

32 0

40 0

52 0

46 0

40 0

48 0

40 0

00 0

12 0

43 0

40 0

00 0

76 0

20 0

56 0

55 0

48 0

66 0

40 0

-69 0

75 0

74 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4क

622

4ड

622

4इ

622

4ब

622

479

471

2ब

471

468

467

1अ

467

465

464

454

464

436

437

1इ

431

2क2

441

2ब

441

2अ

441

4अ

441

1 ब2

376

1ब 1

376

2क 1

378

2क3

378

3606 01/04-20

9745

0 9746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

378

2ब

378

2अ

378

3ब

359

385

1ब

385

1अ

384

12ब

234

2 नं. 22कस्तूरिपटिट

236

237

180

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

64 0

80 0

09 0

40 0

25 0

28 0

90 0

65 0

86 0

52 0

14 0

25 0

01.

60 9747.

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

179

60.

178

177

2ऐ

2हेच

177

[फा. सं. आर-25011/14/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव.

New Delhi , the 16th December, 2004

S. O. 3212.- Whereas , by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1736 dated the 23rd July 2004 issued under sub section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , (herein after referred to as the said Act ) the Central Govemment declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Madurai via Tiruchirapalli and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public from 23.08.2004;

And whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government; And whereas , the Central Govemment , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Govemment , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

9748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

SCHEDULE

Taluk : Sankari

District: Salem

State: Tamil Nadu

Area

Sub-Division no.

Name of the Village

Survey no.

Hectare Are

Sq.mtr. 1

6 NO . 21 MORUR

634

633

632

610

11A2

611

610

7A1

610

7A2

613

615

613

617

623

74 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

622

479

471

468

467

465

464

454

436

437

431

2C2

441

1B2

376

1B1

2C1

378

2C3

378

9749

40 0

17 0

84 0

12 0

00 0

80 0

95 0

05 0

27 0

20 0

42 0

40 0

92 0

40 9750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

378

359

385

384

12B NO. 22 KASTHURIPATTI

234

236

237

180

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

60 9751 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

179

178

177

[No. R-25011/14/2004- O.R. - I ] RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली. 16 दिसम्बर, 2004

और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के उक्त का. आ. 3213.- केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ०1736 ,तारीख 23 , जुलाई, 2004 द्वारा , तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुचिराप्पल्ली होकर मदुराई तक और आसनूर से शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी । और उक्त अधिसूना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 23.08.2004 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केंद्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

अतः अब , केंद्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है । और केंद्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का योग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केंद्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 9752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

अनुसूची

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

जिला: सेलम

तालूका: आत्तूर

गाँव का नाम

राज्य: तमिलनाडु

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर

हिस्सा नंबर 1

3 नं. 98 पेरियेरी

193

4अ

193

1क

2अ

2ब

2अ

अ

422

115

113

2ब

114

109

4ब

107

2ब

106

2ब

103

8अ

103

5अ हेक्टर

आर वर्ग मीटर

24 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

9अ

103

5ब

103

1अ

103

1ब

103

102

124

1क

124

1इ

1ड

124

1एफ

8ब

131

8अ

131

130

131

4ब

131

2अ

130

134

133

134

108

नं. 97 नत्तक्करै

108

106

2अ

108

3ब

अ

1अ

360601/04-21

9753

09 0

56 0

12 0

40 0

76 0

27 0

45 0

78 0

82 0

40 0

12 0

03 0

57 0

36 0

24 0

0 9754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

1512

1513

5314

6ब नं. 94त्यागनूर

6क

8ब

5ब

5अ

2ब

2अ

2ब

312

331

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 4

6 0

40 0

71 0

54 0

33 0

69 0

71 0

60 0

12 0

40 0

29 0

78 0

83 0

79 0

65 0

40 0

60 0

40 0

72 0

67 0

40 0

88 0

13 0

23 0

10 0

77 0

53 0

60 0

41 0

44 0

70 0

22 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

2अ

1अ

742

741

1क2

1क1

8ब

242

241

1अ

111

नं. 95 मुम्मुडि

111

112

110

109

106

1अ

106

1ब

107

117

4ब

4अ

117

143

9755

6 4

75 09

90 0

40 0

93 0

55 0

01 0

17 04

88 0

59 06

40 0

38 0

75 0

48 05

48 0

21 0

27 0

86 01

35 0

15 0

50 0

79 0

40 0

61 0

67 11

33 0

43 0

75 08

95 0

27 20

66 0

86 0

97 9756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

139

135

136

146

147

148

149

150

187

3ड नं. 86 देवियाकुरिच्चि

187

उक

167

3ब

187

अ

167

187

190

1ब

190

1अ

190

191

181

180

179

2अ

179

2ब

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] 4

78 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग- II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

179

178

174

175

176

160

161

181

161

151

150

अ

142

1क

143

1ब

143

1अ

141

2ब

141

2अ

144

140

३अ

4अ

138

1ब

137.

1अ

137

9757

03 0

39 0

80 0

96 0

63 0

40 0

94 0

15 0

30 0

46 0

77 0

00 9758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

136

135

134

133

2 नं. 87 वडकुमरै

2अ

2ब

2अ

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

92 0

95 0

40 0

80 0

10.

30 0

04 0

36 0

87 0

27 0

08 0

40 0

21 0

95 0

34 0

72 0

19 0

27 0

67 0

26 0

65 0

40 0

64 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

232

4 नं. 76 सारवाय

232

231

204

203

205

15ब

201

2क1

201

2ब

198

200

198

200

284

285

9759

40 0

32 0

68 0

52 0

61 0

06 02

41 0

00 0

98 0

63 08

23 0

54 0

31 01

61 0

23 0

67 00

40 03

79 01

81 0

65 0

68 12

03 0

08 0

68 0

28 07

98 0

05 9760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

285

332

336

339

7ब

339

340

343

317

345

175

6 नं. 75 सदासिवपुरम

175

5 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

00 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 1

175

177

175

174

1042

174

9क

174

178

9ब

178

15अ

178

154

178

179

अ

179

170

169

167

162

163

120

9 360601/04-22

9761

6 4

78 0

38 0

98 0

40 0

50 0

73 0

24 0

56 0

40 0

12 0

24 0

49 0

74 0

12 0

93 0

09 9762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

119

114

12ड

114

121

114

10ब

114

12इ

114

10अ

114

124

3ब

9एम

अ

9एल

9जे

9ऐ

9के

9एफ

9हेच

6क

6अ

6ब

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

23 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

9ब

9अ

913

6क

6ब

9ब

9अ

14अ

14ब

1अ नं. 72वलैयमादेवि

5क2

5क 1

9763

11 03

55 0

27 0

10 0

42 0

63 0

66 0

40 0

20 0

27 0

40 0 9764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

332

4ड

4क

4ब

4अ

5ब

5अ

13क

13ब

133

11 ब

11 क

15क

15ब

16क

16ब

16अ

151

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

6 0

48 0

60 0

40 0

71 0

91 0

20 0

45 0

40 0

17 0

49 0

28 0

40 0

03 0

55 0

31 0

63 0

40 0

58 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग IIII-- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2ब

8एल

8क्यू

8पि

8ओ

9अ

1ब

1क

1अ

19ब

431

15ब

15अ

11अ

105

107

109

123

124.

125

126

1ब1

1क

125

1अ

125

1ब

125

9765

52 04

58 09

06 08

72 01

81 0

55 0

40 0

94 0

35 0

58 0

08 0

22 0

62 0

96 0

89 0

40 0

19 0

40 0

00 9766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1

172

नं . 71 तुलुक्कनूर

172

1ब

171

1 ब

149

140

136

2ब

129

135

132

2ब

132

40 नं. 70 आत्तूर टाउन

वार्ड एफ ब्लाक नं. 19

वार्ड एफ ब्लाक नं. 17

वार्ड एफ ब्लाक नं. 16

35 9767 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

वार्ड एफ ब्लाक नं. 13

वार्ड एफ ब्लाक नं. 12

वार्ड ई ब्लाक नं 14

08.

वार्ड ई ब्लाक नं. 12

00 9768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

340

4 नं. 52नरसिंगपुरम

340

341

253

341

252

341

2क

341

2ब

342

1जि

342

1एफ

342

1 इ

342

1अ

326

325

318

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

00..

95 9769

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

318

317

403

1ड

403

399

1क

403

1ब

403

4जि

399

4एफ

399

5अ

399

1इ

399

1क

399

316

अ

304

1अ

304

386

379

380

384

306

392

391

309

369

370

295

3606 G1/04-23

6 '5

15 06

44 0

50 0

70 0

12 0

0 9770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

377

299

अ

149

नं. 42 तांडवरायपुरम

4अ

149

4ब

170

5क

170

169

168

163

162

159

9ड

159

9क

159

9ब

159

9अ

160

9अ

160

157

उक

157

अ

756

1ब 1

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii )} 4

6 0

87 0

88 0

68 0

40 0

32 0

03 0

52 0

51 0

96 0

40 0

30 0

80 0

10 0

78 0

75 0

21 0

68 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii)]

1अ

156

155

170

नं. 44 ईच्चमपटिट

171

170

171

168

169

155

2अ

154

2ड

150

149

342

149

341

1हेच

149

278

5 नं. 45 सिलियमपटिट

278

231

277

अ

277

4क

276

274

273

125

138

273

138

143

9771

56 0

77 0

40 0

80 0

62 0

95 0

28 0

83 0

32 0

03 0

55 0

20 0

92 0

14 0

43 0

66 0

85 0

18 0

50 0

72 0

09 0

42 0

59 9772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

143

9ब

143

931

143

2अ

143

2ब

143

1अ

145

146

166

169

170

173

14बं

173

14अ

173

12अ

173

10अ

178

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

40 0

10 0

50 0

10 0

41 0

46 0

82 0

36 0

40 0

43 0

75 0

69 0

10 0

56 0

26 0

94 0

09 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

178

177

7ब

184

7अ

184

183

188

194

123

194

12इ

194

12ड

194

12क

194

12ब

194

6ब

194

6अ

194

197

उब

197

10अ

197

10ब

197

7ब

203

7अ

203

9773

03 07

34 06

31 04

77-

98 0

23 0

59 0

87 0

40 0

55 0

47 0

67 0

0 9774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

203

5इ

203

5ड

204

16ब

204

16अ

204

205

2 नं. 46 मल्लियकरै

302

301

287

284

281

285

283

282

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

40 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

241

233

232

235

229

110

198

114

1जे

199

1ऐ

199

3ड

199

1इ

199

1एफ

1ड

199

200

119

183

184

185

124

122

5अ

320

नं. 49 अरसनत्तम

320

5ब

320

8अ

320

9775

79 0

50 08

30 15

67 00

89 08

87 00

40 00

15 0

27 25

69 0

86 0

78 0

43 00

40 0

67 0

62 0

13 0

41 0

00 0

0 9776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

256

238

उब

238

अ

238

1क

238

1अ

234

1क

234

1अ

234

1ब

233

3जि

233

३एफ

233

3इ

233

3ब

233

अ

233

1ब

233

1अ

231

उक

231

3ड

231

3ब

231

2अ

नं. 48 गोपालपुरम

3ब

1ब

2ब

2अ

1अ

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

21 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

17ब

171

161

104

1क

105

1अ

105

2ब

1ब

3606 G1/04-24

9777

04 0

28 0

143

81.

0 9778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

3 तालूका : गंगावल्ली

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

जिला: सेलम

नं. 25 ओटियत्तूर

9अ

३एफ

3इ

3ड

3ब

उक

अ

2अ

2ब

2क

4ब

4अ

332

2इ राज्य: तमिलनाडु

93 0

77 0

42 0

53 0

74 0

40 0 .

26 0

41 0

91 0

07 0

[फा. सं. आर-25011/14/2004- ओ.आर-1 ] रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 16th December, 2004

S. O. 3213.- Whereas , by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1736 dated the 23rd July 2004 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , ( herein after referred to as the said Act ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Madurai via Tiruchirapalli and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public from 23.08.2004;

9779

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

Taluk : Attur

District: Salem

Sub-Division no.

Nameof theVillage

Survey no. 1

3 NO . 98 PERIYERI

193

3A State : Tamil Nadu

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 4

65 9780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

422

115

113

114

109

107

106

103

102

124

131

130

131

130

134

133

134

1 NO . 97 NATHAKARAI

108

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

38 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

108

15A2

15A3

15A4

NO . 94 THIYAGANUR

'58

9781

01 0

96 0

24 0

21 07

18 0

37 0

51 0

40 0

54 0

33 0

69 0

12 0

40 0

78 0

83 0

79 0

65 0

40 0

72 0

67 0

40 0

23 0

77 0

0 9782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

3A2

3A1

7B2

7B1

1C2

1C1

282

2B1

1 NO.95 MUMMUDI

111

112

110

109

108

107

117

143

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 4

6 0

60 0

41 0

44 0

70 0

22 0

75 0

90 0

40 0

93 0

55 0

01 0

17 0

88 0

59 0

40 0

95 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

139

135

136

146

147

148

149

150

187

NO. 86 DEVIYAKURICHI

187

190

191

181

180

179

9783

27 14

66 20

86 0

97 03

71 22

83 01

15 02

04 26

11 0

06 0

0 9784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

179

178

174

175

176

160

161

151

150

142

143

141

144

140

138

137

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

00 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

136

135

134

133

NO . 87. VADAKUMARAI

11-

2A 3606G1/04-25

9785 4

92 0

40 0

05 0

30 0

04 0

36 0

87 08

27 0

08 0

40 03

21 0

95 0

34 0

72 02

19 0

27 0

67 04

26 11

21 22

10 0

29 04

93 0

07 0

63 0

20 02

85 13

64 04

0 9786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

3 NO . 76 SARVAI

232

231

-5

231

204

203

205

15B

201

2C1

201

198

200

198

200

284

285

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 4

31 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

285

332

336

339

340

343

317

345

175

NO.75. SADASIVAPURAM

175

9787

6 4

02 04

83 06

09 0

92 0

32 0

88 0

81 0

15 0

92 0

40 0

19 0

55 0

89 0

0 9788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1976

175

177

175

174

10B2

174

178

15A

178

15B

179

170

169

167

162

163

120

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

: 0

09 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

119

114

12D

114

12A

114

10B

114

12E

114

10A

114

124

9789

6 4

38 0

40 0

52 04

99 0

23 0

14 04

41 0

16 0

88 0

92 0

65 0

18 0

22 03

36 03

44 0

08 0

73 0

60 01

30 0

50 0

15 0

42 0

41 00

94 0

74 0

36 01

23 0

05 9790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

9A3

14A

14B

1 NO.72 VALAIYAMADEVI

5C2

5C1

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

11 0

55 0

96 0

58 0

60 0

36 0

97 0

77 0

56 0

16 02

40 0

50 0

54 0

40 0

76 0

27 0

41 0

10 0

45 0

08 0

40 0

20 0

80 0

52 0

40 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3A2

13C

13B

13A

11B

11C

15C

15B

16C

16B

16A

15A

9791

71 0

91 0

40 0

72 0

97 0

0 9792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

19B

4A1

15B

15A

105

11A

105

107

109

123

124

125

126

1B1

125

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

40 9793 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

172

NO . 71 THULUKKANUR

172

171

149

140

136

129

135

101

132

Ward F Block No. 19

NO.70 ATTUR TOWN

0 .

Ward F Block No. 17

Ward F Block No. 16

3606G1/04-26 9794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 1

Ward F Block No. 13

Ward F Block No. 12

Ward E Block No. 14

Ward E Block No. 12

92 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

340

NO.52NARASINGAPURAM

340

2D3

341

2D2

341

342

326

325

318

9795

94 00

0 9796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1976

318

317

403

399

403

399

316

304

386

379

380

384

306

392

391

369

370

295

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

14 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

377

299

149

NO.42 THANDAVARAYAPURAM

149

170

169

168

183

162

159

160

157

181

156

9797

87 0

77 0

16 0

61 0

20 0

51 0

68 0

01 9798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1976

156

155

2 NO . 44 EACHAMPATTI

170

171

170

171

168

169

155

154

150

149

3B2

149

3B1

149

1H NO 45 SEELIYAMPATTI

278

277

276

274

273

125

138

273

138

143

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4

6 0

58 0

77 0

80 0

40 0

80 0

53 0

98 0

62 0

95 0

52 0

28 0

83 0

04 0

32 0

03 0

76 0

37 0

10 0

55 0

20 0

92 0

45 0

14 0

10 0

59 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

143

2B.

143

145

146

166

169

170

173

14B

173

14A

173

12A

173

10A

173

178

9799.

82 0

43 0

10 0

28 0

03-

76 0

42 0

40 0

26 0

00 0

0 9800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

178

177

184

183

188

194

12A

194

12E

194

12D

194

12C

194

12B

194

197

10A

197

10B

203

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

57 9801

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

203

16B

204

16A

204

205

NO.46 MALLIYAKARAI

302

301

287

284

281

285

283

282

3606 G1/04-27

19 0

90 0

51 0

23 0

65 0

73 0

64 0

17 0

01 0

92 0

15 0

50 0

86 0

40 0

00 9802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

241

233

232

235

229

110

198

114

199

200

119

183

184

185

124

122

3 NO.49 ARASANATHAM

320

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 0

79 0

50 0

30 0

67 0

89 0

87 0

40 0

15 0

27 0

69 0

43 0

86 0

78 0

69 0

43 0

40 0

20 0

65 0

76 0

67 0

53 0

51 0

26 0

62 0

40 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

256

238

234

233

231

4 NO.48 GOPALAPURAM

9803

65 0

98 0

63 0

56 0

41 0

37 0

57 0

97 0

50 0

87 0

09 0

70 0

84 0

61 0

40 0

80 0

39 0

88 0

21 9804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

17B

17A

16A

12.

93.

104

105

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

93 0

40 0

10 0

87 0

79 0

82 0

84 0

57 0

61 0

88 0

40 0

30 0

99 0

95 0

98 0

70 0

20 9805

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: Tamil Nadu

District: Salem

Taluk: Gangavalli

NO. 25 ODHIYATHUR

3A2

93 00

93 01

77 0

33 0

[No. R-25011/14/2004- O.R:-I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3214.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुच्चि, मदुराई और शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

9806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50)की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1 )द्वारा प्रदत्त शतिक्यों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति उस तारीख से, जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रति लिखित रुप में आक्षेप श्री आर. वज्रवेलू, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , चेन्नई-तिरुच्चि मदुराई उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना और आसबूर से शंकरी तक ब्रांच पाइपलाइन परियोजना, 4/2 , आरोक्यसामी स्ट्रीट, काफोर्ड कालोनि, तिरुच्विराप्पल्ली -620 012 , (तमिलनाडू) को कर सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तालूका: आत्तूर

जिला: सेलम

राज्य: तमिलनाडु

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर हिस्सा नंबर

हेक्टर

आर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 नं 98 पेरियेरी

193

4अ

193

1क

194

331

192

1अ

08 नं. 70 आत्तूर टाउन

वार्ड ई ब्लाक नं. 12

73 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

9807 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

159

नं. 42 तांडवरायपुरम

159

169

168

163

162

154

[फा. सं. आर-25011/14/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th December, 2004

S. O. 3214.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Govemment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Trichy, Madurai and Sankarn in the State of Tamilnadu , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas , it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act.1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . R.Vajravelu , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Chennai- Trichy-Madurai Product Pipeline Project with a branch pipeline from Asanur to Sankari , 4/2 , Arockiasamy Street , Crawford Colony, Tiruchirappalli -620 012 , Tamilnadu.

9808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

SCHEDULE

Taluk: Attur

District : Salem

State : Tamil Nadu

Area

Nameof the Village

Surveyno. Sub-Division no.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

6 NO . 98 PERIYERI

193

194

3A1

192

Ward E Block No. 12

NO.70 ATTUR TOWN

73 NO.42THANDAVARAYAPURAM

159

169

168

163

162

154

[No. R-25011 /14/2004- O.R. -I ]

RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3215.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुचि, मदुराई और शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए :

9809 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 )की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1 )द्वारा प्रदत्त शतिक्यों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

भारत के उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति उस तारीख से , जिसको राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रति लिखित रुप में आक्षेप श्री आर. वज्जवेलू, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , चेन्नई- तिरुचिव -मदुराई उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना और आसनूर से शंकरी तक ब्रांच पाइपलाइन परियोजना , 4/2, आरोक्यसामी स्ट्रीट , काफोर्ड कालोनि, तिरुच्विराप्ाल्ली -620 012 , (तमिलनाडू) को कर सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: तमिलनाडु

जिला: तिर्वल्लूर

तालुका : पोन्नीर

क्षेत्रफल

हिस्सा नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गॉव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

आर

नं 104 सोतुपेटुंबेडु

[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव 3606 GI/04 28 9810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 16th December, 2004

S. O. 3215.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Trichy , Madurai and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And , whereas , it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act.1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . R.Vajravelu , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited Chennai- Trichy - Madurai Product Pipeline Project with a branch pipeline from Asanur to Sankari , 4/2 , Arockiasamy Street , Crawford Colony, Tiruchirappalli -620 012, Tamilnadu .

SCHEDULE

Taluk : Ponneri

District : Tiruvallur

State : Tamil Nadu

Area

Nameof the Village

Survey no . Sub-Division no.

Hectare

Are Sq.mtr.

6 1

39 NO.104 SOTHUPERUMBEDU

[No. R - 25011/18/2004-O.R. - I ]

RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

9811 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3216.- केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम उक्त और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन )अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात अधिनियम कहा गया है)की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के संख्या का० आ ०1740 , तारीख पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना 23 , जुलाई , 2004 द्वारा , तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुचिराप्पल्ली होकर मदुराई तक और आसनूर से शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।

और उक्त अधिसूना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 23.08.2004 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा (1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केंद्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केंद्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का योग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केंद्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 9812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

अनुसूची तालुका : अम्बत्तूर

जिला : तिरुवल्लूर गॉव का नाम

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : तमिलनाडू

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर

हिस्सा नंबर 1

3 सट्टनकाडू ( थिरुवोटियूर टाऊन)

वार्ड डि ब्लाक 1 टि एस 4

वार्ड डि ब्लाक 1 टि एस 3 नं. 41 मनालि

258

4अ

258

331

258

332

258

3अ3

258

3ब

253

1ब

253

1अ

127

2ब3

116

115

113

11 हेक्टर

आर वर्ग मीटर

81 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

100

1ब

1अ

1ब

अ

1ब

1अ

उब

3अ

1ब

1अ

नं. 28 अरियलूर

9813

6 4

42 0

08 0

24 06

78 04

48 0

38 0

42 0

31 0

89 0

42 0

87 0

08 0

45 0

14 9814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

1 तालूका: पोन्नेरि

जिला: तिरुवल्लूर

396

5 नं 150 विचूर

396

395

2अ

394

6ब

394

360

2क

360

2ब

360

2अ

360

361

363

2अ

362

2ब

362

2अ

358

352

1क

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 4

6 0

69 0

65 0

75 0

13 0

51 राज्य: तमिलनाडु

42 0

62 0

07 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ শাল II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1ब

352

372

नं 121 पेडुंगवूर

373

380

375

378

उक

377

उब

377

अ

377

400

1अ

400

397

398

395

414

412

414

429

428

2अ

431

1ब

431

442

458

2ब

459

2अ

459

456

460

461

453

452

481

9815

40 00

0 9816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

479

478

544

543

544

545

547

1 ब

547

131 ब

547

131अ

547

112

557

556

562

1अ

565

564

572

573

नं 123 कुम्मनूर

2अ

2ब

1क

1 ब

1अ

2ब

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

72 0

40 0

39 0

38 0

05 0

66 0

95 0

59 0

07 0

53 0

09 11

36 0

57 01

24 0

60 0

73 0

63 06

35 03

99 0

13 0

05 9817

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2अ

1अ

2अ

1क

1ब2ब

1ड

1ब2अ

1क

211

1ब

1अ

नं 124 अंगाडु

2इ

2ड

2क

2ब

2अ

2ब

2अ

285

287

2क

287

2ब

287

3606 G1/04-29

23 04

34 13

32 01

0 9818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

288

नं 125ओरक्काडु

2ब

2अ

अ

2.32

132

131

251

2क

2ब

3ब

3अ

1ब

1अ

234

5 नं 104 सोतुपेरुंबेडु

232

1ब

232

1अ

231

2ब

231

1ब

230

3ब2

230

2ब2

230

2ब1

230

3ब1

230

अ

162

161

109

3ब

109

108

1अ

108

1 ब

108

2ब

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4

6 0

34 0

39 0

00 0

46 0

56 0

68 0

33 0

80 0

26 0

42 0

00 0

57 0

28 0

70 0

86 0

65 0

08 0

01 0

30 0

76 0

18 0

36 0

70 0

72 0

40 0

53 0

21 0

34 0

97 0

16 0

11 0

51 0

01 0

24 0

39 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2अ

108

2क

108

107

2इ

2ड

107

2ब

107

2अ

न 116 चोलवरम

4ब

4अ

345

344

339

8क

339

467

5ब

467

5अ

467

2ब

471

2अ

471

465

1अ2अ

132ब

465

9819

02 0

0 9820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

472

4ब

478

4ब

478

2अ

478

2ब

487

485

134

485

135

485

112

485

133

485

1 ब

534

5अ

534

5ब

517

499

4क

517

उब

517

अ

521

1अ

515 ब

3क 1

515 ब

2क

515 ब

1ब3

515अ

515 अ

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 0

00 0

44 0

15 0

97 0

64 0

55 0

53 0

14 0

66 0

39 0

74 0

45 0

85 0

40 0

22 0

91 0

40 0

07 0

84 0

99 0

90 0

40 0

33 0

90 0

92 0

24 [फा. सं . आर-25011/18/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th December, 2004

S. O. 3216. Whereas , by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1740 dated the 23rd July 2004 issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , ( herein after referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpsoe of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Madurai via Tiruchirapalli and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas, copies of the said notification were made available to the public from 23-08-2004;

And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notifica- tion is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

9821

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

District : Tiruvallur Taluk : Ambattur

Sub-Division no .

Survey no .

Nameof the Village

Ward D Block 1 TS

SATTANKADU (THIRUVOTTIYUR TOWN)

WardD Block 1 TS

258

NO.41 ΜΑΝALI

258

3A1

258

3A2

258

3A3

258

253

2B3

127

116

115

113

State : Tamil Nadu

Area

Are

Sq.mtr. Hectare

0 9822

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA27, 1926

99.

100

1A NO.28 ARIYALUR

[PART II--SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

42 0

08 0

24 0

78 0

48 0

29 0

30 0

65 0

40 0

33 0

03 0

42 0

53 0

32 0

65 0

38 0

49 0

42 0

73 0

31 09

11 0

28 0

40 0

33 14

08 0

66 0

30 0

89 0

42 0

40 0

87 0

32 0

87 06

42 0

40 0

08 0

45 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

District : Tiruvallur Taluk : Ponneri

396

NO.150 VICHUR

396

395

394

360

361

363

362

358

352

9823

State: Tamil Nadu

0 9824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

352

1B NO.121 PERUNGAVOOR

372

373

380

375

378

377

400

397

398

395

414

412

414

429

428

431

442

458

459

456

460

461

453

452

481

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

;

05 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

479

478

544

543

544

545

547

1A1B

547

1A1A

547

1A2

547

557

556

562

565

564

572

573

NO.123 KUMMANUR

3606 GI1 30

9825

72 16

40 00

39 08

38 06

05 0

46 06

04 09

59.

0 9826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

1B2B

1B2A

2A1

2 NO.124 ANGADU

285

287

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

23 0

34 0

32 0

49 0

05 0

92 0

12 0

03 0

02 0

63 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

288

NO.125 ORAKKADU

2A2

1A2

1A1

2D1

234

NO.104 SOTHUPERUMBEDU

232

231

383

230

382

230

282

230

2B1

230

381

230

162

161

109

108

9827

39 09

00:

18 0

39.

0 9828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

108

107

2A NO.116 SHOLAVARAM

345

344

339

467

471

465

1A2A

465

1A2B

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

38 0

41 0

54 0

76 0

39 0

88 0

10 0

00 0

05 0

12 0

08 0

04 0

40 0

84 0

42 9829

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

472

478

487

485

1A4

485

1A5

485

1A2

485

1A3

485

534

517

499

517

521

3C1

515 B

1B3

515A

515 A

00 10

44 06

97 01

64 04

55 0

53 0

74 0

85 0

40.

84 0

99 0

90 0

24, [No. R-25011 /18/2004- O.R. - I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3217. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में ब्यावर से चित्तौड़गढ तक पैट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इण्डियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा ' सिद्धपुर - सांगानेर पाइपलाइन से चित्तौडगढ़ तक ब्रान्च लाईन " के कार्यान्वयन हेतु एक शाखा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उक्त भूमि में , जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है और जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ।

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है । 9830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] कोई भी व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री ओ. पी. गुप्ता, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, (राजस्थान) , इण्डियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड (पाइपलाइन्स प्रभाग ) , 33 , मुक्तानन्द नगर , गोपालपुरा बाईपास , जयपुर लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 302018 (राजस्थान) को

अनुसूची

तहसील : आसीन्द

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला: भीलवाड़ा

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

1484

रामपुरा

1482

1490

1489

1491

1498

1497

1493

1496

1495

1461

1462

1464

1457

1412

1465

1413

1414

1415

1.0

1416

1429

1433

1432

1437 9831 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर

एयर

1428

1436

1711मिन

1711/3412

1710

1704

1703

1702

2353

2351

2350

2349

2342

2331

2328

2400

2390

2403

2404

2327

2323

2322

2321

2318

2317

2302

2301

80.

2299

2298

2293

2292

2294 9832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27,1926

[PAR II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

राज्य: राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा संख्या

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

2264

2267

2268

2269

2270

2271

2254

2253

2273

2218

2207

2208

06.

2209

2220

2205

2206

2176

2167

2145

2146/3394

2140

2147

2148

2149

2150

90 अखेगढ़

890

893

895

894

30 9833 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला: भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

907

892

908

906

909

919

920

922

937

921

938

933

932

936

930

1026

1036

1035

1037

1038

1057

0 .

1049

1056

1050

1048

1047

1046

1069

1084

3606 G1/04-31 9834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला: भीलवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

1085

1086

1080

1079

1087

1088

1091

1090

1089

40 मोटरास

1231

1229

1230

1291

1276

1290

1289

1288

1319

1286

40 9835 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

1320

1337

1335

1339

1338

1418

1346

1347

1348

1363

1396

1362

1395

1394

1393

002

1885

1386

000

1887

0 008

1888

007

1617

1616

: 0

1618

1631

1653

3136/1653

1652

100

3175/1654

2235

2234 9836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

2232

2180

2182

2183

2185

2190

2186

2187

2172

2171

2169

2158

2159

3251/2159

2167

2161

2166

2163

2164

2165

2138

2139

2140

2141

70 संग्रामगढ़

20 9837 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

वर्ग मीटर गांव का नाम

एयर

हेक्टेयर

64/2037

68/1

68/2040

67/2039

187/2011

187/2011/2109

191

192

196

172

174

173

262

270

271

323

324

322

325

327

329

330

331

339

338

357 9838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

राज्य: राजस्थान गांव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

332

337

335

445

440

438

435

433

675

678

678/1987

677

70 भैरुखेड़ा

104

106

100

111

112

114

116

70 9839 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला: भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

141

143

142

185

186

184मिन

184/270

182

189

191

190

205

209

200

211

210

गजसिंहपुरा

231

शम्भूगढ़

235

236 9840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

237

250

239

240

242

243

203

204

412

413

409

408

414

417

419

423

425

424

453

449

450

451

529

530

531

532

571

569

556

20 9841 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

557

558

553

552

551

548

550

549

762

761

760

696

697

698

699

703

701

08 10

702

708

1101

1100

1099

1098

1096

109/5

1108

1113

1112

1093

3606 GI04-32 9842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान र्गाव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

1111

1110

1114

1115

1116

1119

1118

1120

1121

1122

1123

1079

1078

1070

1069

1068

1067

1066

1203

1201

1202

1200

1199

1180

1197

1181

1182

1-183

1187

40 9843 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

1186/2935

1186

2600

2599

2530

2529

2528

2516

2484/2943

2515

2484/2942

224

बरसमी

1061

1062

1079

1078

1088

1087

1089

4747

4748

4756

4817

4816

4815

4820

4821

4833

4835 9844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला: भीलवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान गांव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

4836

4834

4832

4842

4841

4843

4862

4861

4964

4863

4963

4962

4961

4960

4959

4882

4955

4898

4899

4900

4903

4902

4930

4929

4928

4913

4924

4918

4917

20 9845 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

4923

4919

4920

4921

5212

5213

291

कोलीखेड़ा

294

296

3230

आमेसर

3231

3232

3233

3234

3243

3247

3249

3251

3253

3252

3190

3187

3186

3184

3185

3182

3183

3209

3202 9846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला: भीलवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

3201

3200

370

371

404/4947

404/4934

818/4933

879

880

882

896

899

895

894

905

930

929

927

928

925

924

922

921

1595

1596

1588

1607

1608

1606

10 9847 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

1609

1634

1633

1632

1630

1631

1638

1639

1626

1640

1641

1642

1643

1988

1987

1986

1959

1950/4890

1950

1949

1951

1945

1944

1943

1941

1942

995

माताजी का खेड़ा

247

जबरकिया

248 9848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

256

296

295

292

294

293

413

416

414

594

591

590

588

589

585

583

775

772

764

765

766

763

767

761

762

40 9849 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

759

760

758

757

756

755

836

837

841

842

743

102.1

1026

1024

10 00

1023

1022

1264

1265

00 50

1270

1266

1267

1268

1240

02 80

1239

1238

1236

1241

1235

1234

360104 33 9850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART 11-SEC. 3 (it) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला: भीलवाड़ा

राज्य: राजस्वाम गांव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

1242

1243

1233

1227

1228

1229

1226

1369

1471

1472

09 80

1468

1467

1514

1515

1516

1517

1519

1520

1519/1531

1520/1532

1521

1526

1525

1527

1511

00 पालड़ी

765

764

767

766

20 9851

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

गांव का नाम

2 1

763

769

770

782

781

790

791

794

793

792

795

817

816

815

814

813

812

811

810

808

807

806

130 सरेरी

128

127

146

145

147

148

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

70 0

20 0

90 0

0 9852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल गांव का नाम

खसरा संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

149

150

257

5317/257

171

254

253

174

175

250

249

248

237

241

239

234

5307/233

229

228

1687

1693

1694

1697

1695

1700

1701

1714

1711

1715

20 9853 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिल्त : भीलक्क

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

1716

1713

1712

1717

1718

1668

1667

1666

1665

1662

1663

1664

1661

1660

1659

0-1

1656

1654

1655

1649

1648

1.627

1628

1629

1630

1631

1626

1449

1448

1447 9854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii)] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

राज्य: राजस्थान गांव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

1446

10 60

1452

1445

15 60

1436

1435

1416

1417

1419

1403

1402

1317

06 80

1318

10 80

1307

1319

1306

1305

1280

1281

01 40

1277

1276

1.278 4261

5250/4259

4260

04 30

4265

05 90

4251

4250

4252

4249

10 9855 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थाव

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

4248

4345

4346

4344

4351

4350

4352

07 60

4353

4355

00 80

4360

4354

4359

4391

4382

4390

4389

4436

4434

4417

4419

4420

4421

4432

4422

4431

4429

4430

4428

4490 9856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II SEC . 3 (ii )] तहसील : आसीन्द

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: भीलवाड़ा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर

4488

4487

4489

4666

4667

4686

4664

4688

4687

4689

4690

4691

4718

4719

4717

4715

4716

4790

4788

4794

4795

4796

4840

4839

4846

1528

1527

1600

1602

20 9857 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

तहसील : आसीन्द

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्म मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

1606

1605

1609

1610

1.0

1617

1618

1619

1644

1645

1657

1669

1658

1667

1668

1681

1682

1705

1707

1706

10 70

1700

1717

1699

1698

1697

1696

1740

1756

1755

1767

3606 01/04-34 9858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] तहसील : आसीन्द

जिला : भीलवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

1766

1768

1774

1775

1773

1780

1781

1794

1792

1789

1793

[फा. सं. आर-25011/31/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi the 16th December, 2004

S. O. 3217. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government , that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in Rajasthan State from Beawar to Chittaurgarh a " Branch Pipeline to Chittaurgarh from Sidhpur- Sanganer Pipeline " , should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited .

And, whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid , and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification .

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land , to Shri O. P. Gupta, Competent Authority ( Rajasthan ) , Indian Oil Corporation Limited ( Pipelines division ) , 33 , Muktanand Nagar , Gopalpura Bye - pass , Jaipur 302018 , (Rajasthan) .

9859 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

1484

Rampura

1482

1490

1489

1491

1498

1497

1493

1496

1495

1461

1462

1464

1457

1412

1465

1413

1414

1415

1416

1429

1433

1432

1437

1428

1436

1711Min

9860

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

Tehsil : ASIND

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

1711/3412

1710

1704

1703

1702

2353

2351

2350

2349

2342

2331

2328

2400

2390

2403

2404

2327

2323

2322

2321

2318

2317

2302

2301

2299

2298

2293

09 90

2292

2294

20 9861 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

2264

2267

2268

2269

2270

2271

2254

2253

2273

2218

2207

2208

2209

2220

2205

2206

2176

2167

2145

2146/3394

2140

2147

2148

2149

2150

890

Akhegarh

893

895

894 9862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

907

892

908

906

909

919

920

922

937

921

938

933

932

936

930

1026

1036

1035

1037

1038

1057

1049

1056

1050

1048

1047

1046

1069

1084

40 9863 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27 ,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

1085

1086

1080

1079

1087

1088

1091

1090

1089

Motras

1231

1229

1230

1291

1276

1290

1289

1288

1319

1286 9864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

1320

1337

1335

1339

1338

20.

1418

1346

1347

1348

1363

1396

1362

1395

1394

1393

1385

1386

1387

1388

1617

1616

1618

1631

1653

3136/1653

1652

3175/1654

20.

2235

2234

50 9866 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27 ,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

2232

2180

2182

2183

2185

00 80

2190

2186

2187

05 20

2172

2171

2169

2158

2159

3251/2159

2167

2161

04 50

2166

2163

0 04

2164

2165

2138

2139

2140

2141

Sangramgarh

3606 G1/04-35 9866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

64/2037

68/1

68/2040

67/2039

187/2011

187/2011/2109

191

192

196

172

174

173

262

270

271

323

324

322

325

327

329

330

331

339

338

357

20 9867 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

332

337

335

10 50

445

440

438

435

433

675

678

14 90

678/1987

677

Bhairukhera

104

05 60

106

100

02 40

111

112

114

0. 05

116 9868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II- SEC. 3(ii ) ] Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

141

08 90

143

142

185

186

184Min

184/270

182

189

191

190

205

209

200

211

210

Gajsinghpura

40 Shambhugarh

231

235

236

20 9869 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

237

250

239

240

242

243

203

204

412

413

409

408

414

417

419

423

425

424

453

449

450

451

529

530

531

532

571

569

556 9870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

557

558

553

552

551

548

550

549

762

761

760

696

00 .

697

698

699

703

701

06 90

702

708

1101

1100

1099

1098

1096

06 80

1095

1108

1113

1112

1093

20 9871 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

1111

1110

1114

1115

1116

1119

1118

1120

1121

1122

1123

1079

1078

1070

1069

1068

1067

1066

1203

1201

1202

1200

1199

1180

1197

1181

1182

1183

1187 9872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

1186/2935

1186

2600

06 90

2599

2530

2529

2528

2516

2484/2943

20 90

2515

2484/2942

10 00 Barsani

224

1061

1062

1079

1078

1088

1087

1089

4747

4748

4756

4817

4816

15 20

4815

4820

4821

4833

4835

60 9873 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

4836

4834

4832

4842

4841

4843

4862

06 50

4861

4964

4863

4963

4962

4961

4960

4959

4882

4955

4898

0 07

4899

07 60

4900

4903

4902

4930

4929

02 80

4928

4913

4924

4918

4917

3606 G1/04-36 9874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] Tehsil : ASIND

District: BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

4923

4919

4920

4921

5212

5213

70 Kolikhera

291

10 50

294

296

80 Amesar

3230

3231

3232

3233

3234

3243

3247

3249

3251

3253

3252

3190

3187

3186

3184

3185

3182

3183

3209

3202

80 9875 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District: BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Aren

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

3201

3200

370

371

404/4947

404/4934

818/4933

879

880

882

896

899

895

894

905

930

929

927

928

925

924

922

921

1595

1596

1588

1607

1608

1606 9876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

1609

1634

1633

1632

1630

1631

1638

1639

1626

1640

1641

1642

1643

1988

1987

1986

1959

1950/4890

1950

1949

1951

1945

1944

1943

09 30

1941

1942

70 Mataji Ka Khera

995

40 Jabrakiya

247

248

30 9877

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Khasara No. Name of the Village

2 1

256

296

295

292

294

293

413

416

414

594

591

590

588

589

585

583

775

772

764

765

766

763

767

761

762

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

5 3

60 0

00 0

20 0

40 0

60 0

70 0

90 0

60 0

30 0

50 0

00 0

40 0

02 9878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27. 1926

Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

Khasara No. Name of the Village

759

760

758

757

756

755

836

837

841

842

743

1021

1026

1024

1023

1022.

1264.

1265

1270

1266

1267

1268

1240

(PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

5 0

20 0

4 0

40 0

10 0

00 0

20 0

80 0

10 0

00 0

80 0

40 0

05 30 0

40 0

00 0

14 80 0

00 0

90 0

50 0

80 0

20 0

30 0

1239

1238 0

80 0

1236

1241.

1235 0

30 0

70 0

1234

70 9879

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District: BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Khasara No. Name of the Village

2 1

1242

1243

1233

1227

1228

1229

1226

1369

1471

1472

1468

1467

1514

1515

1516

1517

1519

1520

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

5 3

10 0

40 0

80 0

00 0

20 0

80 0

20 0

10 0

1519/1531

70 0

1520/1532

1521

1526

1525

1527

1511

765 Palri

754

767

766 0

50 0

00 0

50 0

20 0

00 9880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

763

769

770

782

781

790

791

794

793

792

795

817

816

815

814

813

812

811

810

808

807

806

Sareri

130

128

127

146

145

147

29 80

148

20 9881 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District: BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

149

150

257

5317/257

171

254

16 30

253

174

175

250.

249

248.

237

241

239

234

5307/233

229

48 40

228

1687

00 20

1693

1694

1697

1695.

1700

1701

1714

1711

1715

3606G1/04-37 9882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27,1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

1716

1713

1712

1717

09 90

1718

07 60

1668

1667

1666

1665

1662

1663

1664

1661

1660

1659

05 90

1656

1654

1655

04 90

1649

1648

1627

1628

1629

1630

1631

1626

1449

1448

15 00

1447

30 9883 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Are

Name of the Village

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

1446

1452

1445

1436

1435

1416

1417

1419

1403

1402

1317

1318

1307

1319

1306

1305

1280

1281

1277

1276

1278

4261

5250/4259

4260

4265

4251

4250

4252

4249 9884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] Tehsil : ASIND

District: BHILWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

4248

4345

4346

4344

4351

4350

02 20

4352

4353

4355

4360

4354

08 90

4359

4391

4382

4390

4389

4436

4434

4417

4419

4420

4421

4432

4422

4431

4429

4430

4428

4490

20 9885

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Tehsil : ASIND

State : RAJASTHAN:

District: BHILWARA

KhasaraNo.

Name of the Village

2 1

4488

4487

4489

4666

4667

4686

4664

4688

4687

4689

4690

4691

4718-

4719

4717

4715

4716

4790

4788

4794

4795

4796

4840

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

5 3

70 0

17 00 0

06 00

90 0

60 0

00 0

02-

20 0

08 50 0

4839

4846

1528 Kornas

1527

1600

1602

07.

04.

0 9886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : ASIND

District : BHILWARA

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

1606

1605

04 80

1609

1610

1617

1618

1619

1644

1645

1657

1669

1658

1667

1668

1681

1682

1705

1707

1706

1700

1717

1699

1698

1697

1696

1740

1756

1755

04 50

1767 9887 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : BHILWARA

Tehsil : ASIND

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

1766

1768

1774

1775

1773

1780

1781

1794

1792

1789

1793

[No. R-25011/31/2004- O.R. -I ]

RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली. 16 दिसम्बर , 2004

का. आ. 3218.- केन्द्रीय संरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में ब्यावर से चित्तौड़गढ तक पैट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इण्डियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड.. द्वारा "सिद्धपुर-सांगानेर पाइपलाइन से चित्तौडगढ़ तक ब्राज्य लाईन" के कार्यान्वयन हेतु एक शाखा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उक्त भूमि में, जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है और जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ।

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।

कोई भी व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री ओ. पी. गुप्ता , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , (राजस्थान) , इण्डियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड (पाइपलाइन्स प्रभाग) , 33 , मुक्तानन्द नगर, गोपालपुरा बाईपास, जयपुर 302018 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची.

जिलाः अजमेर

राज्य: राजस्थान

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

5..

अन्धेरी देवरी

07 00

1099/1

07 40

1098

00 60

1097

1143

1096

1137

1142

1145

1146

1149

10 30

02 20

1159

1157

04 70

1158

1166/1

1165

1160

1169

1168

5351

30 श्यामगढ़

5398/1

10 .

05 60

49/1

खीमपुरा

02 90

49/2

05 20

49/3

74 9889 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

जिलाः अजमेर

राज्य : राजस्थान

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

90/1

89/1

89/2

00 20

90/2

05 60

04 10.

04 40

114

02 90

113

112

10 50

110

505

506

04 30

507

00 60

504

00 20

514

03 10

515

03 40

516

05 80

520

521

517

497

518

496

04 10

539/2

539/1

3606G1/04-38 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 9890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिलाः अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

540/1

541

553

06 50

554/1

00 70

554/2

02 00

335/1

कुमपुरा

334

333/1

398/1

चौदासिया

400

403

401

402

433/765

433/7

412/2

00 30

415

433/6

417

418

433/5

09 30

421

433/4

432

431

435/4

430

06 80

428/1

428/2

436/1 9891

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिलाः अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर एयर

हेक्टेयर

50 0

437/2

10 07

438/1

437/3

439

00 20 0

438/2

440

321

324

325

316

317

320

313

312

576

577

578

582

583

584

639

656

655

657

659

660

60 0

30 0

04 10 0

30 0

90 0

691/1

693

692

70 0

700/1

9892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

जिलाः अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

राज्य: राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर

699

711/1

03 10

703

709

710

706

726

725

727

728/1

728/2

5266

लुलवा

04 00

5267

30 कांकरनाड़ी

10 20

08 40

12 00

-0

111

03 90

प्रतापपुरा-

30 देवीपुरा

409

414

04 30

413

05 40

412

415

416

60 9893 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायणः 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

5 1

418

467

419

417

466

465

457

02 80

458

459

456

00 40

472

496

495

493

04 60

498

499

492

490

510

509

03 90

478

533

01 80

453

उत्तमी

455

456मिन

463

487

483

518

520

60 9894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिलाः अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

04 40

521

522

03 30

523

524

07 30

544

05 40

543

542

05 00

751

00 70

770

765

03 00

771

02 20

772

05 70

773

774मिन

777

858

859

860

861

857

856

884

877

882

880

889

881

890

897

896

01 9895

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिलाः अजमेर

मसूदा

तहसील :

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

गांव का नाम

898

900

895

899

901

840

839

838

23 दौलतपुरा

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

20 0

02 90 0

80 0

27/1911

137

135

140

142

141

130

110

131

115

116

114

02 40 0

90 0

07 50 0

00 90 0

0 9896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील : मसूदा

जिलाः अजमेर

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

113

112

02 20

117

04 90

259

18 60

191

06 10

196

07 40

197

06 50

199

06 30

202

203

02 90

205

06 80

208

00 20

215

04 50

213

214

09 30

212

60 रेनपुरा

212

04 20

213

214

215

02 50

216

02 20

217

219

03 20

220

223

03 80

234

06 80

239

238

224

272

02 9897 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिलाः अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफलं

खसरा संख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

271

240

270

269

277

274

275

07 60

247

कानपुरा

238

251

240

04 10

241

239

236

230

232

228

229

227

226

225

191

192

193

194

185

195

180

181

0.7

162

3606 G1/04-39 9898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

जिलाः अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

163

179

00 20

161

159

566

04 40

570

571

04 50

565

582

580

583

09 10

579

02 30

585

584

587

588

20 20 जिवाना

2169

2172

2168

2174

2173

2175

2167

2177

2183

2181

2180

2179

2238

2256

20 9899

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिलाः अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सख्या

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

2258

2383

2384

2619

12 30 0

2680/2619

2620

2622

30 0

2637

30 0

2638

248 देवास

282

281

280

275

273

272

267

266

330

332

336

394

424

425

423

426

427

429

726

727

40 0

00 20

00 0

12 10 0

00 90 0

03 80 0

0 9900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

जिलाः अजमेर

राज्य: राजस्थान

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

729

728

724

722

721

720

679

678

680

18 40

681

682

759

620

343

619

786

787

351

अमरपुरा

348

356

354

355

08 40

480

479

482

484

475

08 60

476

469

500

06 20 9901

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिलाः अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

गांव का नाम

501

503

468

489

504

570

575

577

576

560

582

585

584

587

586

604

603

618

616

619

623

615

614

613

611

628

641

648

650

663

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

00 40

02 20

20 0

10 60

18 40

0 9902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

जिलाः अजमेर

तहसील : मसूदा

राज्य: राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

खसरा सख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

657

656

01 00 अकरोल

00 30

23मिन

04 60

04 40

[फा. सं. आर-25011/30/2004-ओ. आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th December, 2004

S. O. 3218.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in Rajasthan State from Beawar to Chittaurgarh a " Branch Pipeline to Chittaurgarh from Sidhpur- Sanganer Pipeline " , should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And , whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid , and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification .

Now, therefore , In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

of India, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri O. P. Gupta , Competent Authority ( Rajasthan ) , Indian Oil Corporation Limited ( Pipelines division) , 33 , Muktanand Nagar, Gopalpura Bye -pass , Jaipur- 302018 , (Rajasthan).

SCHEDULE

District : AJMER

State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : MASUDA

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

ANDHERI DEVRI

1099/1

1098

1097

1143

1096

1-137

1142

1145

1146

1149

1159

1157

1158

1166/1

1165

1160

1169

1168

5351

SHYAMGARH

5398/1

49/1

60 KHIMPURA

49/2

49/3

05 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 9904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

State : RAJASTHAN

District : AJMER

Tehsil : MASUDA

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

90/1

89/1

89/2

90/2

114

113

112

110

505

506

507

504

514

515

516

520

521

517

497

518

496

539/2

539/1

0 9905

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Tehsil : MASUDA

District : AJMER

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr 1

540/1

04-0- 90ソ

541.

0404 20

553

04:04

554/1

08506

554/2

00000

70 KUMPURA

335536/1

02:02

334334

02:02 80:80

3333

20020

20 CHAUDASIYA

398/1

400

02:02 10:

403

401

402

433/765

17:17

433/7

412/2

415

433/6

02-0

417

418

433/53

421

433/

432:32

431

435/4

430

42811

428/2

436/1

3606 G1/ 04-40 9906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004 /AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27, 1996 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] Tehsil : MASUDA

District : AJMER

State: RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

437/2

438/1

437/3

439

438/2

440

321

324

325

316

317

320

313

312

576

577

578

582

583

584

639

656

655

657

659

660

691/1

693

692

700/1

60 9907 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District : AJMER

Tehsil : MASUDA

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

699

711/1

703

709

710

706

726

725

727

728/1

728/2

LULWA

5266

5267

KANKADNARI

111

PRATAPPURA -

409

DEVIPURA

414

413

412

415

416 9908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

Tehsil : MASUDA

District: AJMER

Khasara No. Nameof the Village

418

467

419

417

466

465

457

458

459

456

472

496

495

493

498

499

492

490

510

509

478

533 UTTAMI

453

455

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 3

5 0

70 0

20 0

00 0

80 0

90 0

30 0

40 0

30 0

00 0

50 0

40 0

20 0

70 0

60 0

90 0

80 0

30 0

456Min

463

487

483

518

520 0

50 0

30 0

20 0

00 0

50 0

60 9909 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil :MASUDA

District : AJMER

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

521

522

523

524

544

543

542

751

770

765

771

772

773

774Min

777

858

859

860

861

857

856

884

877

882

880

889

881

890

897

896 9910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] Tehsil : MASUDA

District : AJMER

State: RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

898

900

895

899

901

840

839

838

DAULATPURA

27/1911

137

135

140

142

141

130

110

131

115

116

114

50 9911

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : AJMER

Tehsil : MASUDA

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

113

112

117

259

191

196

197

199

202

203

205

208

215

213

214

212

20 RENPURA

213

214

215

216

217

219

220

223

234

239

238

224

272

0 9912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] Tehsil : MASUDA

District : AJMER

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

271

240

270

269

277

274

275

90 KANPURA

247

238

251

240

241

239

236

230

232

228

229

227

226

225

191

192

193

194

185

195

180

181

162

20 9913

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District : AJMER

Tehsil : MASUDA

KhasaraNo.

Name of the Village

2 1

163

179

161

159

566

57.0

57/1

565

582

580

583

579

585

584

587

588

2169 JIWANA

2172

2168

2174

2173

2175

2167

2177

2183

2181

2180

2179

2238

2256 3606 G1/04-41

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

5 3

40 0

20 0

40 0

10 0

60 10

20 0

10 0

30 0

20 0

40 0

01.

70 0

0 9914

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1996 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : MASUDA

District : AJMER

Khasara No. Name of the Village

2258

2383

2384

2619 State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

5 0

30 0

20 0

30 0

2680/2619

2620

2622

2637

2638 DEVAS

248

282

281

280

275

273

272

267

266

330

332

336

394

424

425

423

426

427

429

726

727

30 0

60 0

30 0

40 0

20 0

50 0

00 0

70 0

50 0

70 0

50 0

00 0

50 0

90 0

10 0

20 0

80 0

00 0

15 9915

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District : AJMER

Tehsil : MASUDA

Khasara No. Nameof the Village

2 1

729

728

724

722

721

720

879

678

680

881

682

759

620

343

619

786

787

351 AMARPURA

348

356

354

355

480

479

482

484

475

478

469

500

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

5 3

70 0

20 0

80 0

70 0

60 0

70 0

40 0

30 0

20 0

007

118

90 0

80 0

0 9916

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

Tehsil : MASUDA

District : AJMER

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Nameof the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

501

503

468

489

504

570

575

577

576

560

582

585

584

587

586

604

603

618

616

619

623

615

614

613

611

628

641

648

650

663

60 9917 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: RAJASTHAN

District: AJMER

Tehsil : MASUDA

Area

KhasaraNo.

Name ofthe Village

Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

657

656

AKROL

23Min

[No. R- 25011/30/2004-O.R. -I ]

RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 16 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3219.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुचिव , मदुराई और शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ; और ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है ; अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 )की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शतिक्यों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

9918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996 [PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति उस तारीख से , जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रति लिखित रुप में आक्षेप श्री आर . वजवेलू, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , चेन्नई-तिरुच्वि -मदुराई उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना और आसबूर से शंकरी तक ब्रांच पाइपलाइन परियोजना , 4/2, आरोक्यसामी स्ट्रीट, काफोर्ड कालोनि, तिरुच्विराप्पल्ली -620 012 , (तमिलनाडू) को कर सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: नामक्कल

तालूका : रासिपुरम

गॉव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर हिस्सा नंबर

222

232 नं. 48 अरियगवुन्डनपटिट

296

4ब

298

4 नं. 29 पिल्लानल्लूर

2अ राज्य: तमिलनाडु

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर

आर वर्ग मीटर 4

6 0

57 0

90 0

जिला: नामक्कल

तालूका: तिरुचेंगोड्डु

1अ नं. 68 वदूर

232

4 नं. 50 करुमापुरम

229

228

1ब2

228

1ब1

227

3ब

227

अ

183

3 नं 49 राजपाल्यम

183

2ब राज्य: तमिलनाडु

6 0

24 0

11 0

30 0

62 0

96 [फा. सं. आर -25011/15/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव 9919 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 18th December, 2004

S. O. 3219.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Trichy , Madurai and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And , whereas , it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act. 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . R.Vajravelu , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Chennai- Trichy -Madurai Product Pipeline Project with a branch pipeline from Asanur to Sankari , 4/2, Arockiasamy Street , Crawford Colony, Tiruchirappalli-620 012 , Tamilnadu .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 9920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

SCHEDULE

State: Tamil Nadu

District: Namakkal

Taluk : Rasipuram

Area

Sub- Division no .

Name of the Vlilage

Survey no.

Are Sq.mtr .

Hectare

2A2

222

NO . 48 ARIYAGOUNDANPATTI

296

298

NO.29 PILLANALLUR

State : Tamil Nadu

District : Namakkal

Taluk: Tiruchengode

NO.68 VATTUR

232

NO.50 KARUMAPURAM

229

182

228

1B1

228

227

183

NO.49 RAJAPALAYAM

183

[No. R-25011/15/2004- O.R. - I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

9921 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 16 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3220.- केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम उक्त और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन )अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात अधिनियम कहा गया है)की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के संख्या का० आ० 1737 ,तारीख पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना 23 ,जुलाई , 2004 द्वारा , तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुच्विराप्पल्ली होकर मदुराई तक और आसनूर से शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।

और उक्त अधिसूना की प्रक्रियाँ जनता को तारीख 23.08.2004 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा (1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केंद्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केंद्रीय सरकार ,उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का योग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केंद्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

3606 GI/04-42 9922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

जिला: नामक्कल

तालूका : रासिपुरम

गाँव का नाम

राज्य : तमिलनाडु

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर

हिस्सा नंबर 1

226

1अ नं. 61 तिम्मिनायक्कनपटिट

226

1ब

227

224

3ब

224

203

2क 1

203

2इ

203

2क 2

202

201

180

अ

169

158

160

2क

161

2ब

161

232

148

1अ

149

2 हेक्टर

आर वर्ग मीटर

00 0

87 0

26 0

76 0

58 0

33 0

55 0

83 0

40 0

13 0

40 0

97 0

99 0

02 0

34 0

80 0

52 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

149

1ब

149

1अ

144

138

139

1क

139

161

2एफ नं. 60 ईश्वरर्मूतिपालैयम

2जि

161

2इ

2ब

161

2क

2ड

161

150

2ब3

150

2ब4

150

3ड

150

उक

150

३ब

150

अ

143

146

2ब

146

2इ

146

2ड

146

2क

146

2एफ

146

2जि

2अ

146

145

146

182

183

7अ

183

9923

05 0

22 0

79 0

64 0

15 0

87 0

49 0

54 0

14 0

58 0

60 0

33 0

54 0

18 0

40 0

39 0

35 0

22 0

25 0

0 9924

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

186

1ब

187

1ड

188

4ब

188

4इ

4ड

188

4क

188

5क

196

112

2हेच

196

1अ

196

2ब

197

उब

197

अ

196

2अ

197

2अ

197

2ब

197

2क

197

1जि

197

1अ

197

1एफ

197

1इ

197

1ड

198

199

205

1अ

205

1ब

206

4अ

209

1इ

209

1एफ

209

4ब

209

4क

209

3ब 4

6 0

52 0

34 0

48 0

49 0

74 0

09 0

91 0

77 0

84 0

88 0

40 0

78 0

65 0

60 0

70 0

10 0

40 03

63 00

47 0

40 0

01 0

19 01

22 0

47 0

12 17

40 0

51 0

01 18

40 0

45 0

17 0

40 0

24 06

15 0

- 0

25 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

उक

209

210

6अ

210

209

3ब

2ड

1अ

6क

2अ

6ब

6अ

1क

3इ

३एफ

3ड

उक

4अ

4ब

4क

4ड

2ब

2अ

2क

233

1एफ

1जि

2ब

237

1ड

237

1इ

5ब

237

5अ

239

9ब

9925

84 0

40 00

07 0

88 0

61 0

75 0

83 0

40 0

19 0

25 0

97 0

40 0

86 0

98 0

40 0

01 9926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

239

9अ

238

1ब

238

1अ

240

अ

240

253

1एफ

253

1इ

255

4ड

255

4क

255

4अ

256

2एफ

256

2ड

258

4अ

258

अ

258

2ब

258

4ब

258

उब

258

2क

258

2अ

258

1 नं. 59 मंगलापुरम

4ब

4अ

2अ

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

53 0

34 0

77 0

20 0

21 0

27 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6अ

अ

2ब

4ब 2

237

2ब

237

३क

237

अ

238

1अ

238

1ब

235

3क

235

4अ

235

4ब

235

7क

7अ

235

226

230

4अ

230

4ब

230

4क

9927

6 4

47 0

40 0

07 0

85 0

62 0

33 0

96 0

40 0

94 0

45 0

67 0

40 0

51 0

40 0

28 0

63 0

50 0

16 0

16-

01 0

58 0

75 0

04 9928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

3 1

230

4ड

229

1अ

230

229

230

2ड

229

1ब

230

5ब1

230

5अ

163

1अ

1ब

163

1 ब

164

10ब

165

4ड

161

4क

165

7क

10क

165

7ब

165

10अ

165

10इ

165

7अ

165

10एफ

अ

165

३एफ

165

3इ

166

165

5ब

166

4अ

157

5अ

157

5ड

156

157

5क

156

10ब

156

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

28 0

85 0

89 0

20 08

94 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

3 1

155

13क

155

13ब

155

153

1अ

153

1ब

153

7क

176

6ड

176

6क

177

6ड

178

4क

178

4ब

178

4जि

178

149

3 नं. 58 नवलपटिट

149

2इ

153

1क

2क

149

153

1ब

153

3 नं. 57 आयलपटिट

1अ

231

2ब

242

5अ

1ब

1क

2 3606 G1/04-43

9929

00 0

47 0

69 0

51 0

23 0

61 0

60 0

69 0

97 0

40 0

21 0

65 0

51 0

83 0

34 0

62 0

88 0

95 0

35 0

13 0

11 0

14 0

26 06

77 0

86 0

70 0

85 0

22 0

80 0

26 0

40 0

70 0

00 01

55 9930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

108

1ब

108

1अ

108

112

7ब

112

7अ

112

115

119

1ब2

2ब

119

अ

119

उक

119

3ब

5ब

119

123

उक

123

3इ

123

3ड

125

2अ

125

2ब

135

126

135

132

133

1क

133

177

131

177

132

177

133

177

1ब

6 4

36 0

52 0

36 0

96 06

48 0

10 0

61 0

53 09

40 00

37 0

05 0

61 0

39 0

40 0

08 20

51 0

91 0

40 13

01 0

40 01

31 0

18 0

40 0

23 0

82 08

40 0

80 0

07 0

17 10

99 0

24 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

1ब

179

1ड

179

203

2 नं. 56 ककुंडलपटिट

2अ

1ब

2ब

अ

2ऎ

2जे

2हेच2

2एन

331

2अ

2ब

3ब

5अ

5ब

134

2अ

2ब 1

134

2ब3

134

136

3ब3

146

138

956

3ब

9931

28 0

98 0

88 29

93 0

07 0

85 08

36 0

36 24

90 0

06 0

40 0

15 24

34 08

33 09

41 09

75 00

84 0

68 0

41 0

13 0

43 0

40 0

45 01

55 0

37 0

40 31

87 0

90 17

93 0

45 0

32 9932

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

957

950

उब

950

2अ

948

4क

948

4अ

948

947

8क

947

946

139

17 नं.45 मुलैपल्लिपटिट

139

158

1अ

157

8ब

157

8अ

157

143

2अ

143

1अ

143

1ब

142

अ

142

3ब

142

144

142

140

240

2अ

239

३अ

223

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 4

6 0

83 0

77 0

79 0

04 0

40 0

18 0

51 0

12 0

28 0

40 0

96 0

82 0

70 0

13 0

74 0

54 0

81 0

36 0

78 0

98 0

10 0

80 16

54 0

42 0

78 0

14 0

40 0

13 0

40 0

61 0

56 11

57 0

65 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

223

4ब

223

7अ

226

5अ

226

5ब

226

228

2अ

1 ब

132

2अ

1ब

1ड

118

312

118

अ1

118

3ब

1ब1

114

142

114

124

123

242

1ब नं. 47 नामगिरिपेट्ट

242

उब

249

247

246

216

246

235

1ब

246

234

9933

40 00

66 01

34 0

59 0

04.

62 0

55 0

15 0

56 0

20 0

07 0

02 0

85 0

63 0

40 0

92 9934

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

246

245

1ब

245

132

245

2ब

245

अ

257

6अ

257

5अ

257

4ब

257

5ब

257

5क

258

1ड

258

1इ

258

2ब

259

4अ

259

अ

259

4ब2

259

3ड

259

३एफ

259

4ब1

261

1अ

261

2अ

261

2ब

262

2अ

262

2ब

263

2अ

263

2ब

264

3इ

264

उक

264

217

272

1ब

272

2अ

272

1अ

265

266

231

193

2ब

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4

6 0

68 0

72 0

40 0

13 0

40 0

25 0

95 0

44 0

41 0

32 0

91 0

17 0

40 0

40 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

193

अ

193

उक

193

189

191

1अ

191

1ब

191

244

नं. 48 अरियगवुन्डनपटिट

244

1अ

235

2अ

235

2अ

234

2ब

234

236

227

2क2

226

2क 1

222

241

242

222

212

222

1अ

295

296

4ब

298

300

299

1इ

1क

299

1अ

299

2ब

301

302

6अ

302

6ब

302

2ब

323

2ब

2अ

323

1ब

9935

37 04

93 18

89 0

40 0

96 0

81 0

39 0

47 0

16 0

03 0

78 0

66 0

17 0

32 0

54 0

96 0

87 0

05 9936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

321

2ब

321

2अ

321

320

1अ

320

1ब

318

6ब2

319

318

122

120

118

2ब

117

116

1अ

116

2ब

113

4अ

113

4ब

113

2ब

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 0

46 0

94 0

80 0

11 0

99 0

26 0

99 0

88 0

45 0

50 0

28 0

47 0

26 0

45 0

15 0

95 0

50 0

25. 0

25 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1अ

4ब

3ब

अ

2अ

2ब

उक

अ

1अ

3ब

नं. 91 ओ . पच्चुदैयनपालयम

4ड

185

नं. 37 वोडुवन्कुरिचि

4क

185

432

185

2ब

185

1ड

185

1अ

185

188

190

191

2अ

2ब 1

नं. 49 ओ.जेदारपालैयम

231

2ब

3 3606 G1/04-44

9937

16 0

43 0

64 0

49 0

03 0

38 0

89 0

04 0

12 0

40 0

72 0

18 9938

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

2ब

2अ

2ब नं. 89 पेर्मकवुन्दनंपालैयम

2अ

1अ

6अ

1ब

176

6ब 1

अ

उब नं. 35 थोप्पपटिट

1अ

1 ब

7ब

1ड

5अ

11अ

9अ

9ब

8अ

8ब

7ब

7अ

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

85 0

72 0

41 0

03 0

49 0

51 0

22 0

41 0

99 0

25 0

51 0

44 0

74 0

48 0

40 0

65 0

40 0

74 0

47 0

60 0

62 0

40 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग ] [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6ब

6अ

4ब

4अ

146

नं. 34 सिंगलंदपुरम

148

2ब

148

उब

148

अ

148

149

19ब

149

123

149

12अ

149

7ब

149

157

7अ

149

150

15एन

150

151

6एफ

151

5ब

5अ

151

6ड

151

6इ

151

6क

9939

6 4

28 0

20 0

19 0

41 0

23 0

40 0

22 0

65 0

37 0

50 0

64 0

81 0

82 0

47 0

29 0

46 0

40 0

63 0

53 0

09 9940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

151

6ब

151

6अ

202.

3ब 1 ड

202

332

202

205

5ब

205

5अ

205

4ब

206

1क

206

211

207

208

2अ

2ब

2अ

4अ

231

2ब

1अ

1ब

4 न. 21 काक्कावार

218

2हेच

218

2जि

218

2एफ

218

2इ

218

2क

218

2अ

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

42 0

40 0

34 0

88 0

35 0

40 0

90 0

82 0

25 0

96 0

79 0

88 0

08 0

86 0

07 0

72 0

75 0

89 0

38 0

86 0

80 0

08 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

502

2इ नं. 23 रासिपुरम

2एफ

502

2ड

502

2ब

502

503

508

509

513

2अ

514

533

530

479

476

6क

476

6ब

476

474

453

11अ

453

11 ब

453

1अ

453

452

449

9941

82 04

37 0

84 0

70 0

35 0

27 0

44 0

40 0

59 0

76 0

11 0

40 0

05 9942

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

445

7अ

445

7ब

447

1ब

447

15 नं.25/1 चंद्रशेकरपुरम

510

514

484

541

542

543

455

452

18अ

452

446

5अ

446

5क

538

7अ

538

539

4 नं. 32मुरंगपटिट

1अ

3ब 1

1ब 1

1अ

1ब नं 26अनैपालयम

112

2ब

112

2अ

112

1 ब

112

1क

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 0

80 0

07 0

20 0

06 0

60 0

39 0

01 0

45 0

77 0

40 0

59 0

12 0

28 0

90 0

93 0

50 0

76 0

80 0

44 0

18 0

99 0

22 0

53 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 1

113

2ब

113

2अ

102

7ब

102

9अ

102

10अ

102

8अ

102

103

1अ

अ

उब

1अ

1ब

1ब नं. 27 कुरुकापुरम

1अ

9943

6 4

78 0

40 0

08 0

00 0

87 0

60 0

87 0

30 0

40 0

76 0

88 0

25 0

11 0

54 0

22 21

58 0

50 0

55 13

34 0

78 0

73 0

20 0

54 0

74 15

28 0

65 0

95 0

08 0

40 9944

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA27, 1996

३क

3ब

3अ

4क

4ड

5-5

232

1ब

132 नं. 83 एल्लपालयम

1ड

1क

2के

2हेच

2जि

2एफ

1ब

112

4अ

उब

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 0

75 0

40 0

56 0

08 0

44 0

05 0

58 0

31 0

59 0

17 0

47 0

40 0

18 0

25 0

09 0

72 0

98 0

58 0

63 0

56 0

72 0

82 0

09 0

82 0

38 0

70 0

40 9945

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अ

2क

2अ

2क

1 ब

1अ

103

नं. 29 पिल्लानल्लूर

103

102

6एफ

104

101

2क

101

2अ

5ब

5अ

9अ

2एफ

2ड

2इ

2अ

2ब

6ब

6अ

4ब

9अ

नं. 30पोन्कुरिचि

9ब 3606G1/04-45

15 0

46 0

12 22

91 0

65 03

30 15

47 05

57 07

63 0

19 0

40 0

23 0

47 0

40 0

48 0

33 07

40 0

10 0

00 16

40 11

00 0

" 12

16 01

66 0

40 0

36 13

04 0

68 0

00 0

10 0

80 0

25 9946

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

6ब 1

6अ

4ब

4अ

2क

5ब

5अ

2ब

2अ

अ

3ब

3क

4अ

14हेच

14ऐ

14एफ

14क

14ड

2क

2ब

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

14 0

48 0

70 0

35 0

24 0

53 0

25 0

07 0

32 0

72 0

12 0

90 0

34 0

60 0

68 0

04 0

80 0

84 0

40 0

22 0

80 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

जिला: नामक्कल तालूका: तिरुचेंगोडु

1 नं. 87 कल्लूपालेयम

2अ

4ब

1अ

2ब

1ब

1अ

1ब4

1ब3

1अ

1ब

2ब

1क2

1क3

1 ब

1क 1

2अ

1अ

185

2 नं. 86 मुंजनूर

185

184

183

210

9947 राज्य: तमिलनाडु

6 4

80 00

90 09

44 0

20 0

16 0

60 0

78 0

10 17

86 0

76 02

81 0

14 0

72 0

45 0

20 0

40 00

53 08

07 0

19 0

15 0

57 21

68 0

60 17

13 0

29 0

99 0

18 0

67 9948

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

212

3ड

212

३एफ

212

3इ

212

उक

233

215

2अ

216

2क

217

1ब

217

1अ

218

1 ब

218

1अ

219

202

2ब3

202

2ब4

202

2अ नं. 88 मिनंपल्ली

1अ

1.ब

1अ नं 84 मोरंगाम

100

1ड

1क

1अ

6अ

[PART II- SEC. 3(ii) ] 4

6 0

70 0

06 0

43 0

46 0

61 0

04 0

40 0

10 0

77 0

85 0

37 0

64 0

60 0

73 0

19 0

21 0

33 0

00 0

78 0

34 0

61 0

32 0

77 0

45 0

52 0

20 0

09 0

00 0

49 0

50 0

32 0

56 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 1

नं. 92 करूंगलपटिट

1ड

1ब

1अ

2अ

1ब

2क

2ड

4ब

3इ

3ड

4अ

उक

1ब

2अ

1अ

17क

9ड

7क

7ब

7अ

17ब

17अ

76.

218

नं 93 परुटिपल्लि

218

213

9949 4

92 0

98 12

01 0

23 06

27 0

37 0

58 0

05 0

15 01

41 0

18.

33 0

02 0

96 0

93 04

70 0

74 0

53 0

40 0

04 0

72 0

40 0

55 0

89 0

10 43

20 03

36 0

57 0

79 9950

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

219

213

219

211

207

2ब

207

1ब

207

2अ

207

1अ

196

194

191

7ब

191

7अ

191

190

188

187

183

182

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 4

6 0

56 0

40 0

90 0

50 0

71 0

65 0

50 0

46 0

50 0

42 0

17 0

50 0

21 0

80 0

09 0

86 0

47 0

63 0

77 0

59 0

40 0

13 0

22 0

59 0

57 0

59 0

92 06

24 0

81 0

35 0

94 0

52 0

41 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 1

182

181

180

179

175

170

150

1अ

171

14क

110

1ब

110

1क

1अ

110

1ड

110

105

5अ

104

उक

3ब

अ

1ब

1अ

9951

6 4

40 0

54 0

02 0

46 0

93 0

60 0

91 0

96 0

57 0

40 0

64 0

34 0

54 0

18 0

50-

40 0

36 0

91 0

38 0

28 0

82 0

71 0

74 0

96 0

53 0

54 0

43 0

61 0

31 0

79 0

31 0

10 0

41 9952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

1अ

15एफ

15ब

15जि

15हेच

17जे

9 नं.94 रामापुरम

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

09 0

60 0

31 0

02 0

00 0

08 0

40 0

11 0

40 0

18 0

96 0

40 0

28 0

73 0

71 0

37 0

17 0

40 0

09 0

47 0

40 0

69 0

40 0

18 0

50 0

95 0

47 0

77 0

29 0

03 0

51 0

92 9953

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

13ड

2ब

2अ

2इ

308

नं . 68 वटूर

307

306

305

304

1क

131

304

254

431

254

252

3606 GI/04-46

48 07

76 0

25 0

96 02

18 0

61 0

34 0

05 0

91 0

36 0

83 0

76 0

24 0

00 0

23 0

24 0

37 0

52 0

36 0

87 0

74 0

75 0

49 9954

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

233

221

222

224

219

217

2ऎ

217

2ब

217

1ब

132

131

1अ

1 ब

1अ

161

160

5अ

9अ

7ब

7क

7अ

7इ

अ

1अ नं. 69 पिल्लनत्थम

2क

2ब

5ब

5अ

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

52 0

27 0

55 0

40 0

14 0

94 0

04 0

79 0

13 0

09 0

94 0

27 0

55 0

83 0

82 0

24 0

61 0

83 0

40 0

87 0

40 0

46 0

58 0

55 0

33 0

72 0

00 0

55 0

63 0

72 0

44 0

61 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2हेच

2एफ

2जि

2ब

232

नं. 50 करुमापुरम

232

2ब

232

1ब

232

1अ

231

230

229

331

229

1ब2

228

1ब1

उब

227

2अ

213

213-

1ब

6ब

6अ

2अ

1क

1 ब

1ब

1क

1ब

1अ

9955

88 0

80 0

40 0

12 0

40 0

84 0

63 0

72 0

19 0

74 0

92 0

09 0

40 0

00 9956

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

1 नं. 51 तिरुमंगलम

अ

4अ

2अ

1अ

1ब

2ब 3

2ब2 इ

2ब 1

2अ

1ब

2ब

2क

2ब

13 नं. 52 रुप्पगवुंदमपाल्यम

1ब

2ब1

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

48 0

90 0

41 0

93 0

84 0

04 0

71 0

40 0

76 0

40 0

80 0

86 0

63 0

56 0

40 0

30 0

74 0

27 0

49 0

40 0

15 0

17 0

09 0

22 0

40 0

46 0

50 9957

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

431

185

नं. 49राजपाल्यम

186

उब

178

185

183

2एफ

331

178

183

2ब

183

180

6 4

10 0

40 0

42 0

06 0

[फा. सं. आर-25011/15 /2004 - ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th December , 2004

S. O. 3220.-Whereas , by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1737 dated the 23rd July 2004 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , ( herein after referred to as the said Act ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Madurai via Tiruchirapalli and Sarıkari in the State of Tamilnadu , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And , whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public from 23.08.2004;

And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government; And whereas, the Central Governmerit , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appendedto this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers coriferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

9958

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA:

DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

Taluk: Rasipuram

District : Namakkal

State: Tamil Nadu

Area

Sub-Division no.

Name of the Village

Survey no.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

6 NO.61 THIMMANAYAKKANPATTI

226

227

224

203

2C1

203

2C2

202

201

180

169

158

160

161

2A2

148

149

52 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

149

144

138

139

161

2F No.60 ESWARAMURTHIPALAYAM

161

150

2B3

150

284

150

143

146

145

146

182

183

9959 4

6 0

79 0

64 0

06 0

15 0

75 0

96 0

95 0

45 0

01 0

49 0

54 0

14 0

22 0

58 0

03 0

60 0

58 0

67 0

60 0

40 0

33 0

92 0

54 0

18 0

31 0

40 0

39 0

35 0

03 0

22 0

86 0

25 0

05 0

92 9960

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

186

187

188

196

112

196

197

196

197

198

199

205

206

209

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 4

52 0

34 0

48 0

49 0

09 0

91 0

77 0

70 0

40 0

78 0

65 0

60 0

70 0

10 0

40 0

63 0

47 0

40 0

01 0

19 0

22 0

12 0

40 0

51 0

01 0

40 0

45 07

17 0

40 0

24 0

15 06

15 0

25 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/ अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

209

210

209

233

237

239

3606 G1/04-47

9961

6 4

84 0

40 0

28 0

43 0

40 0

83 0

88 0

51 0

39 0

89 0

90 40 0

01 0

56 0

19 0

25 0

86 0

81 0

98 0

40 9962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

239

238

240

253

255

256

258

NO . 59 MANGALAPURAM

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

53 0

34 0

77 0

20 0

87 0

53 0

64 0

21 0

14 0

92 0

37 0

29 0

79 0

21 0

50 0

45 0

40 0

96 0

78 0

29 0

60 0

87 0

27 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

482

237

238

235

226

230

9963

6 4

79 0

07 0

85 0

62 0

33 0

90 0

47 0

40 0

94 0

40 0

45 0

51 0

70 0

19 0

40 0

23 0

40 0

28 0

63 0

05 0

01 0

58 0

75 0

04 9964

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

230

229

230

229

230

229

230

5B1

230

163

164

165

10B

161

165

10C

165

10A

165

10E

165

10F

165

166

165

166

157

156

157

156

10B

156

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

33 0

40 0

15 0

29 0

13 0

71 0

89 0

07 01

11. 0

64 0

94 0

42 0

40 0

73 0

77 0

49 0

70 0

20 0

23 01

99 0

70 02

28 0

97 21

85 0

12 0

09 0

89 13

20 0

63 0

12 0

49 0

40 03

14 0

94 9965

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ { भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

13C

155

13B

155

153

176

177

178

149

NO.58 NAVALPATTI

149

153

149

153

NO . 57 AYILPATTI

2A1

2B2

95 0

26 0

70 0

80 0

40 0

70 0

00 0

55 9966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

108

112

115

119

1B2

119

123

125

135

126

135

132

133

177

1A1

177

1A2

177

1A3

177

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 0

40 0

36 0

52 0

36 0

96 0

48 0

16 0

26 0

10 0

61 0

53 0

40 0

37 0

05 0

61 0

39 0

40 0

01.

08 0

51 0

91 0

40 0

01 0

40 0

24 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

179

203

2 NO . 56 KARKUDALPATTI

2H2

3A1

5B.

134

2B1

134

2B3

136

3B3

146

138

956

9967

6 4

98 0

40 0

93 0

07 0

53 0

85 0

36 0

06 0

40 0

24 0

34 0

33 0

75 0

90 0

68 0

14 0

13 0

40 0

37 0

40 0

87 31

90 0

93 0

79 0

45 0

32 21 9968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

957

950

948

947

946

139

17 NO45 . MULAIPALLIPATTI

139

158

157

143

142

144

142

140

240

239

223

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

00 0

83 0

62 0

79 0

04 0

40 0

18 0

24 0

51 0

40 0

12 0

28 0

63 0

40 0

96 0

82 0

70 0

13 0

65 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

3 1

223

226

228

1A2

118

3A2

118

3A1

118

114

1B1

114

182

124

123

242

1B NO . 47 ΝΑΜAGIRIPETTAΙ

242

249

247

246

2A6

246

2A5

246

2A4 3606 G1/04-48

9969

6 4

34 0

41 0

29 0

71 0

59 0

93 0

58 0

87 0

62 0

51 0

55 0

43 0

14 0

23 0

03 0

OF 0

18 0

49 0

56 0

97 0

07 0

02 0

85 0

63 0

40 0

73 0

92 9970

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

246

245

1A2

245

257

258

259

4B2

259

4B1

261

262

263

264

2A7

272

265

266

2A1

193

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

6 0

68 0

72 0

40 0

13 0

54 0

40 0

95 0

44 0

41 0

32 0

91 0

17 0

03 0

28 0

40 0

90 0

21 0

79 0

02 0

17 0

81 0

54 0

76 0

82 0

56 0

71 0

00 0

07 0

17 0

40 0

13 0

12 0

77 0

40 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

193

189

191

244

NO . 48 ARIYAGOUNDANPATTI

244

235

234

236

227

2C2

226

2C1

226

2B1

222

2B2

222

2A2

222

295

296

298

300

299

301

302

323

9971

34 0

43 0

17 0

08 0

87 0 9972

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

321

320

318

6B2

319

318

122

120

118

117

116

113

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] 4

46 0

94 0

80 0

11 0

99 0

26 0

99 0

88 0

45 0

50 0

28 0

26 0-

45 0

15 0

95 0

50 0

71 0

80 0

35 0

55 0

60 0

25 0

25 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

66:

4B:

4 NO.91.0 . PACHUDAYAMPALAYAM

185

NO.37 ODUVANKURICHI

185

4A2

185

1D-

185

188

190

191

2B1

1 NO.49 O.JEDARPALAYAM

2A1.

9973

76 0

40 0

$00

23 0

00 0

60 0

70 0

77 0

13 0

69 0

41 0

16 0

09.

37 0

64 0

42 0

82 0

49 0

03 0

38 0

89 0

04 0

59 0

12 0

48 0

40 0

18 9974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

2B NO.89 PERUMAGOUNDEMPALAYAM 14

176

6B1

3B NO.35 THOPPAPATTI

11A

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

85 0

72 0

41 0

03 0

49 0

51 0

22 0

41 0

99 0

25 0

51 0

44 0

74 0

48 0

40 0

65 0

63 0

40 0

74 0

47 0

60 0

31 0

62 0

40 0

76 0

44 0

75 0

45 0

38 0

62 0

80 0

40 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

146

NO.34 SINGALANDAPURAM

148

149

19B

149

12D

149

12A

149

157

149

150

15N

150

151

151.

9975

65 08

50 0

0 9976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

151

202

3B1D

202

3A2

202

205

206

211

207

208

2A1

4 NO.21 KAKAVERI

218

218.

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )) 4

6 0

42 0

40 0

34 0

88 0

35 0

90 0

82 0

25 0

96 0

79 0

88 0

08 0

86 0

07 0

72 0

75 0

89 0

38 0

86 0

80 0

27 0

08 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

502

NO.23 RASIPURAM

502

503

508

509

513

514

533

530

479

476

474

453

11A

453

118

453

452

449

449.

3606 G1/04-49

997.7

82 04

86 04

35 0

40 0

35 0

33 0

42 0

95 0

15 0

40 0

44 0

86 0

59 0

11 0

08 0

59 0

66 0

57 0

0 9978

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

445

447

15 NO.25/ 1 CHANDRASEKARAPURAM

510

514

37.

484

541

542

543

455

452

18A

452

446

538

539

NO.32 MURUNGAPATTI

3B1

181

1B ΝΟ . 26 ΑΝΑIPALAYAM

112

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] 4

6 0

80 0

07 0

20 0

06 0

60 0

39 0

01 0

77 0

40 0

59 0

12 0

28 0

90 0

93 0

50 0

76 0

80 0

44 0

18 0

99 0

27 0

22 0

85 0

84 0

69 0

85 0

24 0

16 0

40 0

53 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

113

102

10A

102

103

51.

1B NO.27 KURUKKAPURAM

9979

78 0

46 0

40 0

80 0

08 0

91 0

87 04

60 0

87 02

67 34

42 0

09 0

30 0

40 0

76 10

88 0

11 0

72 03

11 .

87 0

54 14

22 05

58 00

50 0

55 0

78 0

73 0

20 0

54 0

74 00

28 0

65 0

95 00

40 0

00 9980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

2A2

1A2

NO.83 ELLAPPALAYAM

1A2

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

75 0

40 0

56 0

08 0

44 0

05 0

58 0

31 0

59 0

17 0

47 0

40 0

18 0

25 0

09 0

72 0

98 0

58 0

63 0

56 0

72 0

82 0

09 0

82 0

38 0

70 0

40 0

59 0

56 0

40 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

103

6 NO.29 PILLANALLUR

103

102

104

101

9A NO.30 PONKURICHI

9981

6 4

15 0

46 0

12 0

91 0

65 0

30 0

47 0

57 0

63 0

23 0

38 0

48 0

39 0

33 0

40 0

00 0

56 0

69 0

16 0

36 0

68 0

00 0

80 0

25 9982

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

6B1

14H

141

14F

14C

14D

[PART II SEC. 3( ii ) ] 4

6 0

14 0

48 0

70 0

35 0

24 0

53 0

25 0

07 0

105 號 32 0

72 0

12 0

90 0

34 0

60 0

68 0

04 0

80 0

21 0

84 0

80 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

District: Namakkal Taluk : Tiruchengode

3 1

: 1 NO . 87 KALLUPALAYAM

29-

184

1B3

1C2

1C3

1C1

185

NO.86 MUNJANUR

185

184

183

210

9983 State: Tamil Nadu

6 4

20 0

72 0

60 0

10 0

86 0

.76 0

81 0

29 0

72 0

45 0

20 0

53 0

07 0

19 0

15 0

57 0

68 0

29 0

99 0

0 9984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

3 1

212

233

215

216

217

218

219

2B3

202

2B4

202

NO.88 MINNAMPALLI

100

1 NO.84 MORANGAM

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

6 0

70 0

06 0

40 0

43 0

46 0

61 0

85 0

64 0

60 0

73 0

19 0

21 0

33 0

00 0

78 0

34 0

77 0

20 0

00 0

32 0

37 0

67 0

00 0

56 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

3 1

1 NO.92 KARUNGALPATTI

17C

17B

17A

218

2 NO.93 PARUTHIPALLI

218

213

3 3606 G1 /04-50

9985

6 4

92 0

01 0

23 0

27 0

80 0

37 0

05 0

18 0

12 0

33 0

13 0

02 0

96 0

70 0

74 0

53 00

40 0

04 0

72 0

46 0

40 0

55 08

89 0

10 43

20 0

36 05

19 0

57 0

79 9986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

219

213

219

211

207

196

194

191

190

188

187

183

182

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)) 4

19 0

40 0

50 0

65 0

46 0

17 0

50 0

21 0

80 0

09 0

86 0

47 0

63 0

77 02

59 0

40 07

13 0

22 02

59 0

57 0

59 0

92 0

24 0

35 0

41 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

182

181

180

179

175

170

150

171

140

110

105

104

6 4

40 0

02 0

46 0

93 0

60 0

00 0

57 0

40 0

64 0

34 0

54 0

18 0

36 0

91 0

40 0

28 0

82 0

74 0

53 0

54 0

43 0

31 0

10 0

41 9988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

15F

15B

15G

151

15H

17J

9 NO.94 RAMAPURAM

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii )] 4

A 0

92 भारत का राजपत्रः दिसस्पर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

13D

308

NO.68 VATTUR

307

306

305

304

1A1

304

4A1

254

252

9989

6 4

48 0

25 0

34 0

29 0

36 0

04 .

87 0

94 0

74 0

49 0

49 0 9990

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1996

233

221

222

224

219

217

1A2

1A1

161

160

1A NO.69 PILLANATHAM

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

52 0

27 0

55 0

40 0

14 0

94 0

61 भारत का राजपत्रःः दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

232

NO.50 KARUMAPURAM

232

231

230

229

3A1

229

1B2

228

1B1

228

227

213

9991

88 0

40 0

10 0

84 0

63 0

74 0

40 0 9992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996

3 NO.51 THIRUMANGALAM

2B3

2B2E

2B1

1 NO.52

13 KARUPPAGOUNDAMPALAYAM

2B1

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

6 0

48 0

90 0

41 0

93 0

84 0

04 0

71 0

40 0

76 0

40 0

80 0

86 0

63 0

56 0

40 0

30 0

74 0

27 0

49 0

40 0

15 0

17 0

09 0

07 0

22 0

95 0

40 0

46 0

50 9993

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

185

NO.49 RAJAPALAYAM

186

178

185

183

3A1

178

183

180

66 0

[No. R-25011 /15/2004- O.R. -I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3221.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , को लोक हित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है की उड़ीसा राज्य में पारादीप से पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में हल्दिया तक कच्चे तेल के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑइल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए.

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है की ऐसी भुमि जिसके भीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसुचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए.

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है .

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भुमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के अन्दर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री अशोक कुमार दास , सक्षम प्राधिकारी पारादीप - हल्दिया पाइपलाइन परियोजना इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमीटेड , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमीटेड मार्केटिंग डिविजन हाउसिंग कम्पलेक्स , मेघदम्बारा , डाकघर बालासोर 756056 , (उड़िसा) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । कुरूदा,

3606 Gl/04-51 9994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1996 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

अनुसूची

जिला : बालासोर

राज्य : उड़िसा

क्षेत्रफल

तहसील का नाम गाँव का नाम खसरा संख्या

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वर्ग मीटर 1

6 बस्ता

1520

राईसुआं

1477

07 सक्तीराम

265

316

317

318

314

319

313

322

181

180

179

176

173

(

161

162

171

01.85

170

169

168

165

164

163

151

379

98 जलेश्वर

गबगाँ

731

[फा. सं. आर-25011/19/2004-ओ.आर.। ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th December, 2004

S. O. 3221 .-- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum (crude) from Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia in the State of West Bengal , a pipeline should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited; wi And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

9995 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18,2004/अग्रहायण 27,1926

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Ashok Kumar Dash, Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Paradip Pipeline Project, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Marketing Housing Complex, Meghadambaru , Post office- Kuruda , Balasore (Orissa). Haldia

Schedule

State : Orissa District : Balasore

Area

Name of Tehsil Name of Village Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq. Mtrs .

1520

Raisuan

Basta

1477

265

Saktiram

316

317

: 05

318

314

319

313

322

14-

181

180

179

176

173

161

162

171

170

169.

168

165

164

163

151

379

731

Jaleshwar Gabagan

[No. R-25011/19/2004- O.R. - I ]

RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

9996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II- SBC . 3 (ii ) ] श्रम मंत्रालय

SCHEDULE

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

"Whether the action of the management ofGeneral Manager, Integral Coach Factory, Shell Division , Madras 38 , in teminating the service of Shri A. Alice Raj , ex - casual labour with effect from 5-12-88 is justified or not ? If not justified to what relief the workman entitled ? "

का. आ. 3222 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंटेग्रल कोच फैक्ट्री के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1998 का 7 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 41012/209/97- आई. आर. ( बी- I ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004

S.O. 3222. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 7 of 1998) of the Central Government Labour Court , Chennai , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Integral Coach Factory and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

[No. L - 41012/209/ 97 - IR( B - I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR COURT, CHENNΑΙ

2. The petition averments are : The petitioner belongs to Adi -Dravidar community and he was recruited as khalasi on 24-12-85 in the shell division of the respondent factory . The petitioner was working continuously till 4-2-88 . On completion of 120 days service, he is deemed to be in regular service entitled for all rights and privileges including the benefit of Discipline and Appeal Rules 1988. The petitioner appeared for an interview before the selection committee of officers and was selected by the authority. He was in serial No. 182 . The competent authority declared the petitioner was fit for the absorption against permanent vacancies . Instead ofregularising the petitioner, the respondent management recruited the juniors . The respondent management failed to maintain the muster rolls of workman in ' B ' category and the petitioner was working continuously for more than 3 years . The petitioner was suddenly stopped from service. The petitioner was senior - most employee and the respondent violated section 25- C of the I. D. Act. The respondent management had not obtained permission from the appropriate authority for the retrenchment . The matter was raised before the Central Conciliation Officer and it ended in failure. The non -employment of the petitioner is illegal , unjustified and against the principles of natural justice.

PRESENT :

Thiru K. Ramasubramanian , B. Sc . , B. L. , Presiding Officer

Monday the 1st Day of November, 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 7 of 1998

BETWEEN :

Thini A. Alice Raj , 21. Sir C. V. Raman Street, (41st Street), G. K. M. Colony, Chennai 82.

AND

The General Manager , L. C. F. Shell Division , Chomai 38.

AWARD

This industrial dispute has been referred to this court for adjudication of the dispute between the workman Thiru Alice Raj and the management of Integral Coach

actory Shell Division , Chennai , by the Govt . of India , Minsty of Labour by G. O. No 1. 41012 /209/97 - IR(B.I ) , dad 19-5-98, on the following issue :

3. The counter averments are : The petitioner was provisionally enlisted for engagement as a casual labour khalasi as per the order dated 9-3-85 and was engaged as casual labour khalasi from 24-12-85 to 1-1-86 for 9 days and from 25-12-86 to 10-1-87 for 17 days . Subsequently the petitioner was engaged from 5-8-87 to 4-2-88 as casual labour for 181 days continuously and on 4-2-88 the petitioner was terminated from service for ntoral turpitude. The petitioner's brothers and sister are working in the respondent factory. The petitioner filed a false statement that none of his relatives were working under ICF. On verification it was found that the petitioner does not belong to Adi -dravida community. The petitioner's sister and brothers gave declaration that they belong to christian community. The petitioner was not recruited on regular basis and he has not attained the temporary status. The committee of officers have not selected the petitioner against the permanent vacancy. The petitioner is not entitled to any of the reliefs since the petitioner has not been retrenched from service . The Labour Commissioner decided the decision of the ICF administration is proper. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the Regional 9997

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Labour Commissioner ( C) . The petitioner also filed O. A. 963/90 before the Hon'ble CAT and subsequently it waswithdrawn. Again the petitioner raised the same issue before the ACL ( C) in the year 1997 and it ended in failure. So, the petition is liable to be dismissed.

4.The point for consideration is:

Whether the action of the management in terminating the services of the petitioner with effect from 5-12-88 is justified, if not to what relief he is entitled ?

5. The Point : The petitioner was provisionally enlisted and engaged as casual labour khalasi as per the order dated 9-3-85 and the petitioner was working as casual labour khalasi from 24-12-85 to 1-1-86 for 9 days and from 25-12-86 to 10-1-87 for 17 days . Subsequently. the petitioner was engaged from 5-8-87 to 4-2-88 as casual labour for 181 days continuously. The petitioner was terminated from service on the ground of moral turpitude on 4-2-88 . The petitioner gave a declaration that none of his relatives were working in the respondent factory. Subsequently it was found that his brothers and sister are working under the respondent management . The petitioner does not belong to Adi -Dravida community since the petitioner's brothers and sister declared that they belong to christian community. The petitioner has not attained the temporary status . The above facts were admittedby both sides .

6. On the side of the petitioner, the petitioner was examined as W.W.I and Exs . W.I to W.7 were marked.

7. Ex. W. I is the copy of community certificate . The original community certificate was not produced before this court . Ex. W.2 is the provisional list for engagement as casual labour . Ex. W. 3 is the list of persons who have been selected subsequent to the recruitment of the petitioner. Ex . W. 4 is the copy of termination order . The petitioner preferred a petition before the Asstt . Commissioner of Labour ( C) , Madras under Section 2 -A and the copy of the petition is Ex. W. 5. Ex . W. 6 is the rejoinder . Ex. W. 7 is the copy of letter issued by the Asstt. Personnel Officer to the petitioner.

8. The following facts were admitted by W.W.1 during the cross - examination:

"The petitioner was working as casual labour from 24-12-85 . The petitioner belongs to christian community. The petitioner was not appointed on S. C. quota . His brother was working in I. C. F. On termination the petitioner preferred petition to the management and the copy of the petition is Ex . M. I , and the copy of the reply is Ex. M. 2. ( It is evident from Ex. M. 2 that the petitioner gave false declaration before the railway authorities) . The petitioner preferred a petition before the ACL, and the ACL arrived at a conclusion that the decision ofthe railway authorities is correct . On that ground the petitioner was dismissed . The petitioner preferred an appeal and the copy of the appeal petition is Ex . M. 3. The petitioner was not shown as S. C. in Ex. W. 2. "

It is evident from the above that the petitioner does not belong to SC community. It is also evident that the petitioner had furnished a false declaration . It is also evident that the petitioner was not retrenched and was only terminated from service. The petitioner has not adduced any satisfactory and acceptable evidence . So, there is no sufficient reason to allow the petition. For the reasons stated above, I hold that the action of the respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner is justified and that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief. The point isanswered accordingly.

9. In the result, an award is passed holding that the action of the management in terminating the services of the petitioner Thiru Alice Raj is justified and that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief. No costs .

2004. Dated at Chennai , this the 1st day of November, THIRU K. RAMASUBRAMANIAN , Presiding Officer List of Witnesses Examined

For the Workman

For the Management

M.W.1-V. Swaminathan W.W.I-A. Alice Raj .

List of Exhibits Marked :

(Thedocuments marked are only xerox copies) For the Workman :

Ex. W.I ..

Community certificate.

Ex . W. 2/9-3-85 Provisional list for engagement of casual labourers (khalasis) .

Ex. W. 3 / 11-5-88 Office order.

Ex . W. 4/4-2-88 Termination order.

Ex. W. 5/ .. 2-A petition .

Ex. W. 6/.. Rejoinder.

Ex . W. 7 /28-5-97 Letter from respondent to petitioner.

For the Management :

Ex . M.1 / .. Letter from petitioner to the respondent.

Ex. Μ . 2/26-2-88 Reply from respondent.

Ex. Μ . 3/25-5-89 Appeal preferred by the petitioner.

9998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

APPEARANCES :

Ex. Μ. 4/ .. Letter from respondent to the petitioner.

On behalf of the workman : Mr. R. A. Chamaria , Advocate.

Onbehalf of the employers :

Ex. M. 5/.. Particulars of service of A. Anandaraj , father of the petitioner.

Mr. B. M. Prasad , Advocate.

State : Jharkhand

Ex . Μ.6/.. -do- A, Siman Raj , brother of the petitioner.

Industry : Railway Ex . M. 7/..

Dated, Dhanbad, the 10th November, 2004 -do- A. Jacob Raj , younger brother of the petitioner.

AWARD

Ex . M. 8/ .. -do- A. Mary Priscilla, sister of the petitioner.

Ex . M. 9/ ..

Rule 2001 of 1. R. Estt . Rules .

Ex. M. 10/..

Rule 2004 of 1. R. M.

The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise, ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -41012 /231 / 95 - IR(B - 1 ) , dated, the Nil .

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Divisional Railway Manager, Eastern Railway Dhanbad Division , Dhanbad PPO Dhanbad Dist . Dhanbad in changing the designation of Smt . Sarawati Devi Waterman Reverting her back to Safaiwala is justified ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ? " का. आ. 3223.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ईस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 2, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1997 का 41 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. The case of the concerned workman according to Written Statement submitted by her is as follows [सं. एल. 41012/231/95- आई. आर. ( बी- I ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004

The concerned workman submitted that she got her employment in the year 1980 as Safaiwala in place of the service of her husband late Gaya Ram. Thereafter vide Office Order No. ZTS /E/2/R- S dt . 18-3-86 , her designation was changed as Waterman in place of Sri Jan Mohammad, Waterman who was then absenting . Subsequently as he got his voluntary retirement she in his place discharged her duties as Waterman till 19-1-83 i.c. continuously for a period of seven years . She submitted that the position of Waterman is higher than that of ' Safaiwala' .

S.O. 3223.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 41 of 1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2. Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Eastern Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L -41012 / 23 1/95 - IR (B -I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :

She alleged that management vide Office Order No. ZTS/E / Z/RS / CL . IV dt . 19-1-93 reverted her to the post ofSafaiwala which was arbitrary, illegal and humiliating. Though she submitted her representation against the said order started attending her duties as ' Safaiwala' under protest . She disclosed further that thereafter though the sponsoring union took up her matter with the management did not yield any result.

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer.

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 .

Reference No. 41 of 1997

PARTIES :

It is her contention that as she continuously worked in the post of Waterman for seven years the management cannot revert her back to the post of ' Safaiwala ' on the ground that she performed duties of Waterman against permanent vacancy. Moreover that reversion was made without sanction of appropriate authority. i Employers in relation to the management of Divisional Railway Manager , E. Rly. , Dhanbad and their workman .

She alleged that as the management did not take any step to change her designation in spite of submitting representation compelled to raise an Industrial Dispute [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication. She accordingly submitted prayer to pass Award directing the management to put her designation as Waterman and allow her to continue in duties of Waterman .

3. Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement-cuni -rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the concerned workman asserted in the Written Statement .

They submitted that the concerned workman was appointed as Safaiwala on compassionate ground andwas posted as such under the Principal ZTS Bhuli . They disclosed that she was put to work as ' Waterman' purely on temporary measure as the person posted as Waterman was on leave in the same pay and grade . They denied the fact categorically that she was reverted back to the post of Safaiwala' as the pay scale of Safaiwala ' and 'Waterman ' are same and identical .

It has been categorically submitted by them that they did not commit any illegality or took any arbitrary decision asking the concerned workman to work to her original post of' Safaiwala ' instead of Waterman where she was asked to work absolutely on temporary basis .

As the claim of the concerned workman is not tenable management submitted prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman.

4. Points to be decided :

"Whether the action of the Divisional Railway Manager , Eastern Railway Dhanbad Division Dhanbad, PPO Dhanbad Dist . Dhanbad in changing the designation of Smt . Sarawati Devi Waterman Reverting her back to Safaiwaia is justified ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitied ?" 5. Finding with reasons

It transpires from the record that management with a view to substantiate the claim examined one witness as MW- 1 . The concerned workman also in support of her claim examined herself as WW- 1 .

Now considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings ofboth sides and also considering evidence of MW - 1 and WW- 1 1 find no dispute to hold that on compassionate ground after the death of her husband she got her appointment issued by the Divisional Personnel Manager to the post of Safaiwala in the year 1980 and was posted at ZTS Bhuli . It is also admitted fact that the scale of Pay of' Safaiwala and of ' Waterman ' are same . There is also no dispute to hold that one Jan Mohammad was posted at Waterman at ZTS Bhuir. It is also admitted fact that said Jan Mohammad was on long leave . It is the contention of the management that as Jan Mohammad was on leave, Principal ZTS Bhuli issued an order directing the concerned workman to work as Waterman absolutely on

9999

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

temporary basis though she used to draw her salary as Safaiwała althrough. MW- 1 during his evidence denied the fact that said temporary order of Waterman in the name of the concerned workman was issued under direction either ofDeputy Personnel Manager or of D. R. M. He disclosed that though by local arrangement the said order was issued the concerned workman in that capacity ofWaterman discharged her duties from 1986 to 1993. This witness further disclosed that in course of her work she was confirmed in the post of Safaiwala and was placed in the pay scale of Rs. 775-1025 by order of the management . He submitted that it was a promotional post and the concerned workman not only accepted that promotion but also started drawing salary under the said pay scale. The witness categorically disclosed that as there was no question of posting the concerned workman as Waterman question of her reversion to the post of 'Safaiwala' never arose . She was temporarily given the job of Waterman in absence of Jan Mohammad though her designation was Safaiwala and not only drew her salary as Safaiwala but also accepted her promotion in that post in the pay scale of Rs. 775-1025 .

On the contrary the contention of the concerned workman is that by order of the management (Ext . W - 1 ) she was designated at Waterman in the year 1986 and started working in that capacity. She disclosed that even after retirement of Jan Mohammad in the year 1990 she was allowed to work as Waterman but in the year 1993 management arbitrary again transferred her to the post of Safaiwala' ( copy of the order during her evidence was marked as Ext. W - 2 ) . She further disclosed that the post of Waterman' is higher than the post of ' Safaiwala' though admitted that the pay scales are same .

From the documents marked as Ext . M - 1 to M - 1/ 3 it transpires clearly that the concerned workman got her appointment as Safaiwala and in the said designated post her pay was fixed in the year 1997 under Railway Service (Revised Pay) Ruies . This pay revision was done after she was returned back to the post of Safaiwala by office order dt. 19-1-93 Ext . W-2 .

It is the contention of the concerned workman that her posting as Waterman was against permanent vacancy and she discharged her duties in that capacity from March, 1986.10 January, 1993. The office order,dt. 18-3-86 Ext . W- 1 shows that on the appeal of the concerned workman, Principal ZTS, Bhuli posted her temporarily as Waterman on her same pay and grade vice Sri Jan Mohammad Waterman absenting . The said office order further shows that the concerned workman was debarred to place claims: in future for her permanent posting on the said post over their senior. Considering the two orders marked as Ext. W-i and W-2 it is clear that from March, 1986 to January, 1993. she performed her duties as watermaan on her same pay and grade. Therefore , it is clear that the concerned 10000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

grade and designation when the post of Waterman fell vacant after 1990. On the contrary it transpires from the document Ext. W-3 that she made an appeal to the Principal , ZTS , Bhuli to allow her to work as Waterman when she by order dt. 19-1-93 ( Ext . W-2) was asked to perform her duties as Safaiwala. She raised the present industrial dispute when her such appeal was not entertainedby the said Principal. Therefore, it is seen that from the very initial outset there was no claim on other part to be redesignated as Waterman for discharging her duties in that capacity. The arrangement which I find from the record was absolutely a local arrangement made by the Principal for the interest of the Institute as the regular Waterman was absenting. Such arrangement was made on appeal of the concerned workman and without changing her designation she agreed to work in that capacity. Therefore, there is no scope to say that the concerned workman was forced to discharge her duties as Waterman. When acceptance on her part to work as Waterman was voluntary on her appeal accepting the condition she without making proper representation to her appointing authority for changing her designation is debarred from claiming so by raising an Industrial dispute. Accordingly, I find no scope to uphold her contention. In the result, the following Award is rendered:-

"The action of the Divisional Railway Manager, Eastern Railway, Dhanbad Division, Dhanbad PPO , Dhanbad, Dist Dhanbad in changing the designation ofSmt. Sarawati Devi , Waterman reverting her back to Safaiwala is justified . Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

का. आ. 3224.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस. सी. सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , गोदावरीखानी ( संदर्भ संख्या 81/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल. - 22013/1/2004-आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004-

S.O. 3224. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 81 / 2003 ) of the Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court , Godavarikhani as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

workman did not draw her salary in the pay and grade of Waterman. No evidence is forthcoming to show that she made any appeal before the management for changing her pay and grade as Waterman. On the contrary though she discharged her duties as such without raising any dispute drew her salary in the pay and grade of Safaiwala. it is clear that the Principal , ZTS was not the appointing authority of the concerned workman . Question of considering promotion to any worker only can be done by the appointing authority or the officer designated to that effect. No material evidence is forthcoming to show that Principal ZTS , Bhuli was the competent authority to consider and change the designation of any workman. Considering office order Ext. W- I it shows that there were other workman who were senior to her to be considered for absorption in the permanent post of Waterman. As the Principal ZTS was not authorised being appointing authority to pass order in the matter of changing the grade of a workman on her appeal he allowed her to work in the post of Waterman termporarily in absence of the regular workman who was posted there on the same pay and grade . The post of Waterman at ZTS Bhuli is a permanent post and one Jan Mohammad was posted there in that capacity. As the said workman was absenting from duty she was posted there temporarily on her prayer by the Principal instead of performing her duties as Safaiwala and the said office order was communicated to her appointing authority. Said Jan Mohammad left service in the year 1990. Therefore froın March , 1986 to 1990 she was allowed to work as Waterman as the Waterman posted there remained absent . Therefore , upto the said period the concerned workman did not accrue any right to be designated as Waterman. Actually after 1990 the said post of Waterman fell vacant and it is seen that till January, 1993 the said post remained vacant wherein she was allowed to work . The concerned workman in course of hearing failed to show any paper that she made representation to the appointing authority for her absorption in the post of Waterman particularly when from the office order it transpires that she was junior to others to claim that post . It is to be taken into consideration that Zonal Training Institute , Bhuli is a Govt . organisation under Ministry of Railways . This institution was created for imparting training to Railway employees of different wing. Therefore , as it is an organisation of Govt . some norms are followed in the matter of appointment , promotion etc. Though the pay scale of Safaiwala and Waterman are same the grade is different . Any order passed temporarily by the Principal , ZTS to serve water to trainees in the institute in absence of regular Waterman by way of local arrangement does not ipso facto create any right to get absorption in the post of waterman superseding her seniors and without getting any order from the appointing authority. There is no whisper at all on the partof the concerned workman that she took up the matter

with appropriate authority in the matter of changing her

[No. L- 22013 /1 /2004- IR(C - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer 10001 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN , INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT :

said charges . Domestic enquiry was conducted . The enquiry was biased. In the enquiry only the Presenting Officer was examined who submitted the documents . Basing on that dismissal order was passed on 1-7-99 . The dismissal order is illegal and arbitrary in nature. Hence , he filed the petition for the above said relief.

Smt. K. Suvarchala , M.A. , B.L. , Chairman -cum- Presiding Officer.

Tuesday, the 26th Day of October, 2004

Industrial Dispute NO. Osteoarthritis 81 of 2003

BETWEEN :

Danapuneni Narsimulu,

3. To this , the respondent has filed counter denying theaverments ofthe petition. The respondent further stated that this Tribunal is not having jurisdiction to decide the dispute. The respondent company deals with coal mining which is Central Government subject and not State Government subject . Therefore , the Industrial Tribunal having Central jurisdiction only is competent to decide the dispute. This Industrial Tribunal , Godavarikhani is vested with only State jurisdiction and therefore , not competent to decide the present dispute.

S/o . Dasaratham, Age 34 Yrs. , Occ: Ex -Badli Filler, S. C. Co. Ltd. , R/ o, H. No. 16-6-63 , Tirumalanagar , Godavarikhani Post ,

Petitioner

Dist. Karimnagar

AND

The General Manager ,

S. C. Co. , Ltd. , Ramakrishnapur Area , Dist. Adilabad

Respondent

This petition coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri Ganta Narayana, Advocate for the petitioner and of Sri D. Krishna Murthy, Advocate for the respondent and having stood over for consideration till this date, the court passed the following:

AWARD

1. This is a petition filed U/ s . 2 -A(2) of I. D. , Act, 1947 filedby the petitioner to set-aside the removal orders dt. 1-7-99 passed by the respondent and to direct the respondent company to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service, with all attendant benefits including full back-wages .

2. The averments of the petition are as follows:

4. It is false to allege that Durgam Posham was declared medically unfit as he was suffering from Osteoarthritis both knees etc. In the fake unfit letter dt. 24-1-91 , it was stated that he was suffering from Hyper Tension and Osteoarthritis of both shoulders joint . Infact, Durgam Posham, father - in -law ofthe petitioner-Durgam Posham adopted illegal method and obtained fake unfit medical certificate. On that basis , the petitioner could secure employment as dependent son - in- law of Durgam Posham. The unfit certificate was proved as fake certificate and was obtained only for the purpose of securing dependant employment to the petitioner in the respondent company. The respondent issued charge sheet on 7-8-93 under the company's standing order No. 16 (2) stating that he secured employment in the respondent ompany fraudulently and the medical certificate produced by the petitioner was fake certificate. Domestic enquiry was ordered against the petitioner. The petitioner was given full and fair opportunity in the domestic enquiry. Three witnesses including the doctors who purported to have examined the father -in -law of the petitioner were examined, in addition to the Presenting Officer, on behalf of the respondent . The Enquiry Officer has given opportunity for cross -examining . Eleven documents were produced before the Enquiry Officer. The petitioner has not raised any objection on the documents.

Dr. Y. Ram Mohan Rao , Addl . Chief Medical Officer stated in his evidence that no medical board was constituted by him to examine Sri Durgam Posham on 15-12-90 and he was very much on duty on that day. He further stated that he has not at all examined Sri Durgam Posham and finally stated that the signature on the medical unfit letter bearing No. AH/RKP / 90 / 65 - A / 168 , dt . 24-1-91 pertaining to Sri Posham is not his signature and was forged . It was a fake document and was not despatched from the Area Hospital , Ramakrishnapur.

Dr. V. K. V. Prasad , Ortho Surgeon, has stated that the signature on the medical board letter bearing The petitioner secured job in the respondent company under the dependant employment scheme , after his father - in- law named Durgam Posham , Coal Cutter, RK No. 4 Incline of Ramakrishnapur was declared medically unfit on 24-1-91 by the Medical Board of Area Hospital , Ramakrishnapur, Adilabad District . The petitioner was initially appointed as Badli Coal Filter on 13-6-1991 and posted at 4th Incline , Ramakrishnapur . Later, he was posted to RK No. 1 Incline, Ramakrishnapur, till his dismissal . On 7-8-93 , the respondent issued a charge sheet on the alleged ground that the petitioner violated company's standing order No. 16 (2 ) and committed theft , fraud, dishonesty in connection with the company's business , stating that he submitted a fraudulent medical unfit certificate of Sri Durgam Posham. The petitioner submitted his explanation denying the above

3606 G1/04-52 10002 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] No. AH/RKP/90/65 -A/ 168 , dt . 24-1-91 and Ref. 4 which declared Sri Durgam Posham as unfit was not his signature and was a forged one . He further stated that his Reg . No. 16848 , but not 14028 as mentioned in Ref. 4. He stated that he did not examine Sri Durgam Posham and did not sign on the medical board unfit letter dt . 24-1-91 . Thus , the unfit letter is a forged document .

27-7-1987 . In view of the provisions of Art . 254 (2) ofthe Constitution, the provisions of Section 2 -A(2 ) as incorporated in the Act by the A. P. Amendment Act 32/87 is valid and operative. There is nothing in the phraseology of Sub-section (2) of Section 2-A, which limits the applicability of its provisions to" State Industries" as contended by the petitioner.

5. The enquiry was conducted in a fair manner and the petitioner was given full opportunity to defend his case. The charges levelled against the petitioner were proved in the enquiry. Copy of the enquiry report was supplied to the petitioner with letterdt . 16-11-98 to submit his representation . The petitioner submitted his representation on 16-12-98 , on the enquiry report . The disciplinary authority has carefully examined the representation of the petitioner and found to be not satisfactory. The charges levelled against the petitioner were proved and he was removed from the services of the respondent company on 2-7-99 . There are no valid and reasonable grounds to set aside the termination order passed against the petitioner. Hence, the petition may be dismissed.

6. On behalf of the petitioner, Ex. W - 1 is marked.

On behalf of the respondent , Ex . M - 1 to Ex. M-8 are marked.

7. Heard both sides .

Within the legislative filed enumerated in Entry -22 ofList III , the legislative of the State has , subject to the provisions ofthe constitution, legislative powers to enact laws . There is nothing in the provisions of the constitution or in the Act, brought to the notice of the court, which diminutes such plenitudinous legislative power including in the area of legislation for adjudication of industrial disputes in respect of industrial undertakings of a disputes in respect of industrial undertakings of a Federal Government . But for the enactment by the Parliament of the Industrial Disputes Act and subject to the provisions ofArt . 254(2 ), the State Legislature was competent toenact the entirety of Industrial Disputes Act (qua the concurrent legislative field enumerated in Entry - 22 of List III read with Art . 245 of the Constitution) for its operation within the territory of Andhra Pradesh . Under the provisions of Art . 254(2) and in the context of the A. P. Amendment having received the assent of President , the provisions of Section 2 -A( 2 ) operate proprio vigore even against any provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , enacted prior to the A. P. Amendment Act . The contention of non- applicability of Section 2 - A(2 ) of the petitioner, company is therefore without merit or force" .

In the light of the above decision, it is quite clear that the petitioner can challenge U/ s. 2 - A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act though he is working in the CoalMine. Hence, the issue is decided in favour of the petitioner.

8. The 1st point raised by the respondent is that thisTribunal does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the trial. Section 2- A( 2) of I.D. Act is not applicable to their company. This court has already decided in the previous matters that the petitioner is having a right to file petition U/s . 2 -A( 2 ) of 1. D. Act. The contention of the respondent is that the coal mine industry is Central Government Enactment . But as held by his Lordships in 1. L. Naidu and others Vs. Union of India and others reported in 2003 ( 2 ) ALT 470 , this court has got every jurisdiction to adjudicate the 1. D. U/s . 2 - A( 2 ) of 1. D. Act . Their Lordships held in the above decision , as follows :-

9. The petitioner worked as badli coal filler at RK. No. I Incline, Ramakrishnapur, at the material point of time. While the petitioner was discharging his duties, it came to the respondent management that the petitioner got employment under the dependent employment scheme by producing a fake medical unfit certificate of Durgam Posham who was declared medically unfit . The fact that the petitioner has secured employment in the respondent company as a dependent to his sick father- in - law, is admitted by the petitioner. Now the point for consideration is whether the certificate produced by the petitioner is genuine or not ?

10. The first and foremost defence putforth by the petitioner is that at the time of the domestic enquiry, only onePresenting Officer was examined and the Doctors were not examined .

"The contention regarding the non - applicability of Scc . 2 -A( 2 ) to an Industrial Dispute as defined in Scc . 2( k) read with Scc . 2 ( A ) of the Act is relation to Hindustan Zinc Ltd. , a Government of India Undertaking is wholly misconceived . The Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 is a legislation enacted by the Parliament pursuant to the field of legislation referable to Entry - 23 of List ill ( Concurrent List) of the Seventh Schedule read with Art . 246 of the Constitution of India . The Act has been amended by the Industrial Disputes Act ( A. P. Amendment ) Acı , 1987 (Act . 32 of 1987) . The Act was reserved by the Governor of Andhra Pradesh on 24-4-1984, for consideration of the President and the assent of the President of India was received on 22-7-1987 which assent was published in the A. P. Gazette on 10003 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

Smt . K. SUVARCHALA, Chairman -cum -Presiding Officer

Appendix of Evidence

The respondent in his counter denied the allegations and specifically stated that two doctors who purported to have examined Sri Posham-father - in- law of the petitioner were examined before the enquiry officer .

Witnesses Examined

For the Workman:

For the Management :

-Nil-

Exhibits

For the Workman :

Removal order .

Ex. W- 1 dt. 1-7-1999

ForManagement :-

Charge-sheet .

Ex. M- 1 dt. 7-8-19931993

Ex. M-2 dt . 7-8-1993

Ack. , to charge-sheet .

Dr. Y. Ram Mohan Rao , Addl . Chief Medical Officer/Medical Superintendent stated in his deposition before the enquiry officer that no medical board was constituted by him to examine Sri Durgam Posham on 15-12-90 and he was very much on duty on that day. He further stated that he has not examined Sri Durgam Posham and that the signature on the medical unfit letter bearing No. AH / RKP / 90 / 65A/ 168 , dt . 24-1-1991 pertaining to Sri Posham, is not his signature and was forged. Thus , the medical unfit letter was a forged one. He further clearly stated that the medical unfit letter is a fake document and was not despatched from the Area Hospital , Ramakrishnapur.

Reply to charge-sheet .

Ex. M - 3 dt. 18-8-1993

Enquiry report .

Ex. M-4 dt. 18-8-1993

The petitioner cross -examined the witness that he could not elicit any facts contradicting the statement of the doctor which he deposed in the chief examination. The uncontradictory statement of the doctor prevailed.

Ex . M-5 dt. 22-3-1994

Enquiry proceedings alongwith concerned material documents .

Ex. M-6 dt. 25-11-98 2nd show cause notice .

Ex. M- 7 dt . 16-12-1998 Reply to show -cause notice.

Removal order .

Ex. M-8dt. 1-7-1999

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

10. The second witness examined before the enquiry officer is Dr. V. K. V. Prasad, Ortho Surgeon. He deposed that he worked in the Area Hospital , Ramakrishnapur. The signature on the medical board letter bearing No. AH/RKP / 90 / 65A/ 168 , dt . 24-1-91 and Ref. 4 which declared Sri Durgam Posham as unfit , was not his signature and was a forged one. As per the certificate, the medical examination was done on 15-12-90 . As a matter offact, a letter of unfit will be issued on the same day, had it been genuine . He further stated that his registration number is 16848 , but not 14028 as mentioned in Ref. 4. Hefurther stated that he has not examined Sri Durgam Posham and did not sign on the medical board letter dt . 24-1-91 . It is a forged document . Further it is clearly stated by the witness that he was on leave from 19-1-91 to 27-1-91 and was out of station . The attendance register was also produced before the enquiry officer .

का. आ. 3225.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या सी. जी. आई. टी./एल. सी./आर/ 240/89 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 22012/105/89- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 12. The report of the enquiry officer is marked as Ex. M-4. Show cause notice was issued to the petitioner i.e. , marked as Ex . M-6. The petitioner had given a reply to the show-cause notice i.e. , marked as Ex. M- 7 . In that the petitioner clearly stated that he is a dependent employee of Sri Durgam Posham . The medical certificate on the basis of which, the petitioner was employed, was proved as a fake document . There is no case for the petitioner.

13. There appears to be no reason to interfere with the decision of the respondent .

In the result, this petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs .

S.O. 3225. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 204 / 89 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

[No. L -22012/105 /89 - IR(C- II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this , the 26th day of October , 2004.

10004 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

any dispute in regard to this settlement at any level statutory or non - statutory , judicial or non- judicial.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT/LC / R/ 240/ 89

Shri C. M. Singh , Presiding Officer.

Since the parties have agreed mutually to the above terms , I have no hesitation in recording the award in terms of settlement raised between the parties . The award is made accordingly with no order to cost.

Shri Kasam Ali ,

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर, 2004

Through the Assistant Secretary, R. K. K.M. S. ( INTUC) , PostChandametta ,

Distt. Chhindwara - 480447

Applicant

Versus

The Agem.

Nandan Colliery, Post Danmua ,

Distt. Chhindwara - 480555

Non - applicant

का. आ. 3226.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मैसूर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में लेबर कोर्ट, कोजाईकोडे के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या ( सी ) 4/98 एवं ( सी ) 6/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । AWARD

[सं . एल. 12012/367/97- आई. आर. ( बी- I ) , सं.एल. 12012/368/97- आई. आर. ( बी.-I ) ] Passed on this 18th day of November , 2004

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004 The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. 1. - 22012 ( 105) /89-IR-C.II dated 8-11-89 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the Management of Nandan Colliery ofM/ s . W. C. Ltd. , Kanban Area in retiring Shri Kasam Ali son of Shri Din Mohd . w.e.f. 1-7-88 is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman concerned is entitled ? "

S.O. 3226.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. (C) 4/ 98 & (C) 6/98 ) of the Labour Court , Kozhikode , Kerala State as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of State Bank of Mysore and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L- 12012/367/97 - IR(B - I), 2. Parties have filed their respective statements of claim . The Management has also filed rejoinder and certain documents . The case was at the stage of recording evidence.

No. L- 12012/368/97 - IR(B- I) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE , KERALA STATE

Dated this the 4th day of October, 2004

PRESENT :

3. A settlement duly signed by the parties was filed on 2-9-2004. The settlement is signed by the respresentatives of the Union on behalf of the workman concerned . Shri S. K. Rao , Advocate verified the settlement on behalf of the workman /Union and Shri A. K. Shashi , Advocate verified the settlement on behalf of the Management . The terms of settlement are as under:--

Shri K. Balasubramanian , B. Com. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer

COMMON AWARD

I. D. ( C) 4/98 & I. D. ( C) 6/98

"1. It is agreed by the Union that the case No. CGIT/ LC/ R/ 240/89 is hereby withdrawn from the CGIT, Jabalpur since Kasam Ali S /o Deen Mohd . had died in the year 1988 and as such matter has been disposed of naturally.

L.D. ( C) 4/98

BETWEEN :

2. It is also mutually agreed by both the parties to file this settlement before the Hon'ble Court for giving consent award in a form of "No Dispute Award"

1. The Manager ,

3.This is full and final settlement in respect of the employee concerned . The Unmen will not raise

State Bank of Mysore , G.H. Road, T. B. S. Building , Calicut , Kerala - 670001 .

10005 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]

2. The Regional Manager- II ,

State Bank of Mysore ,

K.G. Road,

Managements

Bangalore-560001

AND

Sri Satheesh P, S/ o Gopi ,

Pandara Kandiyal House,

Vakkath Thazham,

Post Chalappuram ,

Workman

Calicut-2.

REPRESENTATIONS :

Sri V. Sreedharan Nair,

ForManagements

Advocate , Calicut

Sri M. Asokan ,

For the Union

Advocate , Calicut

L. D. (C) 6/98 :

2. I. D. (C) 4/98.- The claim statement of the worker is summarised as follows : The worker was employed under the Management as a temporary staff in the month of November '93 and he continued in service upto 30-6-1997 on which day he was illegally denied employment by the Management . In the year 1996 worker had worked for 318 days and this acquired right of permanency. The Management was not in habit of maintaining proper employment records and paying the due legal benefitsto the employees with an obvious motive to circumvent the statutory provisions and to deny permanancy to the workers designating them as trainees or temporary or casual . The action of the Management amounts to unfair labour practice and violation of principles of Law. Workman was paid monthly and the Management used to obtain vouchers in different names. The action of the Management is illegal, and infragrant violation of principles of natural justice . Hence workman prays for passing an Award directing to reinstate him in service with continuity of service and backwages .

BETWEEN :

1. The Manager,

State Bank of Mysore, G.H. Road, T. B. S. Building, Calicut, Kerala -673001 .

2. The Regional Manager - II ,

State Bank of Mysore ,

K.G. Road, Bangalore-560002.

Managements

AND

3. L. D. (C) 6 /98.- The workman involved in the dispute was a temporary staff who continuously worked in the management establishment from the month of December 1991 till 8-7-1997 on which day his services were illegally terminated by the Management . According to the worker he had worked in the Management establishment for 594 days continuously and had worked for more than 240 days within the span of 12 calendar months and thus entitled for regularisation of services . The unlawful labour practice adopted by the Management is also depicted in detail as stated in I. D. ( C) 4/98 . So the workman prays for reinstatement in service with backwages and continuity in service .

Sri B. Vinod Godfrey,

S/oManual, Karibil Paramba House ,

Workman

Post Vellayil , Calicut-673001

REPRESENTATIONS :

ForManagements

Sri V. Sreedharan Nair, Advocate, Calicut

Sri K. Abdussalam ,

ForWorkman

Advocate, Calicut

COMMON AWARD

4.Management Nos . 1 and 2, the Branch Manager and Regional Manager of the Bank have filed counter statements in both reference cases raising identical contentions .According to the Management these workers were only temporary workers and have never worked for more than 240 days continuously in any preceding 12 months as stated in the claim statement . It is further contended that the Management has never terminated their service. The details of period each worker has worked during their employment period is also stated in the counter statement . According to the Management the workers involved in the dispute were working purely on temporary basis and are not entitled for regularisation in service.

5. Refuting the case of the management both workers have filed detailed rejoinders reiterating their eligibility for reinstatement and regularisation in service .

6. The evidence consists of the oral evidence of WW1 and WW2 and Exts . Ml to M8 . On the basis of the rival pleadings and evidence the following points arise for determination :-

These cases were referred by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour as per Order No. L. 120 12/367/ 97 - IR (B - I) and Order No. 12012/368 /97 - IR(B - I)dated 20-8-1998 to adjudicate the justifiability or otherwise the action of the Management Bank in terminating the service of two workers included in the dispute. In pursuance of the notice, both parties appeared and filed statement through counsel of their choice . Both cases were jointly filed as per order in M. P. 35/2000.

10006 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 / AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

"Whether the termination of workers involved in the dispute is justified ? If not what relief they are entitied to ?"

7. Points. The claim ofthe workers that they were working as temporary sub - staff in the Managemet-Bank was not disputed. The case of the workers is that they had Continusously worked in the Management -Bank for more nan 240 days and are entitled for permanency.

8. The worker involved in I. D. ( C) 4/98 when examined as WWI and the worker in I. D. (C) 6/98 and WW2 have given evidence about their nature of crobioyment and the period of work undertaken by them. According to these witnesses they have worked for more than 240 days continuously in the year 1996 in the Management -Bank. WW1 has also stated that the Management used to obtain payment vouchers evidencing receipt of salary from him in different names and this was obviously done to defeat the provisions of Law and deny permanency.

9. Exts . M1 and M2 series are the various wage vouchers signed by the worker in I. D. (C) 4/98 and Exts . M7 and M8 series are those given by the worker in I. D. (C) 6/98 relating to various periods ranging from 1991 to 1996. These vouchers would show that the workers were paid daily rated wages . Some of the payment vouchers are seen issued in some other names whereas the payment of all these vouchers are seen acknowledged by one and the same person i.e. , the workers in the reference. Ext. M6 wages register for 1980-1999 would further support the above case . Ext . M3 and M4 are the bonus registers for the period from 1978 to 1996 and 1997-1999 . Ext . M5 is attendance book of the sub -staff for the period 1997-2000. All these registers contain the names of the workers involved in the dispute . These documents coupled with the testimonies of WW1 and WW2 would strengthen the case of the workers that they have continuously worked for more than 240 days in the management-Bank atleast during the span of 12 calender months .

10. It was vehemently contended by the learned counsel for the worker that another wage register was produced along with Ext . M6 which was taken back and Ext. M5 is not the one reproduced in substitution. This , according to the learned counsel was done with an oblique motive to screen true facts from the notice of the Court.

11. An Officer of the Bank has filed an affidavit stating that Ext . M5 is the one returned and reproduced. Though I am not fully impressed with the veracity of the statements in the affidavit . But I leave the matter as it is since the production or non -production of the disputed register may not tilt the position in either way.

12. Management has no case that the appointment was made for a fixed term or was made contrary to Statute

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] and Rules . Since the workers were working for more than 240 days in a year , termination without complying with Sec. 25F is illegal. The position also gains support from 2001 AR SC W 4862 (23) . But there is nothing to show that the workers were appointed in substantive vacancy or that they were selected as per any recruitment Rules . Under these circumstances order of reinstatement may not be proper and instead payment of compensation as per Sec . 25F will be most appropriate and do justice to theparties.

13. In the result, an Award is passed holding that denial of employment to the workers involved in the dispute in both reference cases is not justified . Management is directed to pay compensation to the workers involved in the disputes as per S. 25F of the I. D. Act.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, revised, corrected and passed by me , this on the 4th day of October, 2004.

K. BALASUBRAMANIAN, Presiding Officer APPENDIX

Witnesses examined on the side of the Workmen:-

WW1 Satheesh , P.

WW2

VinodGodfrey.

Witnesses examined on the side of the Management :-

NIL .

Documents marked on the side of the Workmen :- NIL.

Documents marked on the side of the Manage- ment :-

Ext. M1 (Series)

Vouchers signed by WW1 ( 22 in Nos .)

Ext. M2 (Series)

Vouchers signed by WW1 (2 in Nos.)

Ext. M3

Bonus Register for the period from 1978-96 .

Ext. M4

Bonus Register for the period from 3/97 to 3/99 .

Ext. M5

Attendance Register for sub staff.

Ext. M6

Salary Book for the period from 1980-1999 .

Ext. M7 (Series)

Vouchers issued in the name of WW2 (8 in Nos . )

Ext . M8

Voucher issued in the name of Sunil but signed by the worker.

10007

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

का. आ. 3227. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, डब्ल्यू.सी.एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर (संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./एल.सी./आर/57/02) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल. 22012/46/2001- आई . आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 29th November , 2004 S.O. 3227.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. CGIT/LC/ R/57/02 ) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western Coalfields Ltd. , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

[No. L- 22012 /46/ 2001 -IR( CM - II) ] N.P. KESHAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT /LC/ R/ 57/02

Shri C.M. Singh , Presiding Officer

-Applicant The General Secretary, B.K. K.M.S. (BMS) PO Parasia, Distt. Chhindwara . (MP) .

Versus

-Non -applicant The General Manager ( IR) , Western Coalfields Ltd. , CoalEstate, Civil Lines , Nagpur.

AWARD

Passed on this 18th day of November, 2004.

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L - 22012/ 46/ 2001 - IR( CM - I1 ) dated 10-4-2002 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :

"Whether the action of the Management of Nandan Mine No. 1 of WCL , Kanhan Area , Distt. Chhindwara (MP) in not providing job to Ku . Shyamwati , daughter of Late Jhanaklal , Mining Sirdar ofNandan Mine No : I is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ?" 2. The workman/Union has filed his statement of claim . While the proceedings were in progress , a settlement duly signed by the parties was filed on 25-5-2004. The settlement is duly signed on behalf of parties concerned. For proving the fact that the settlement is duly signed by the parties concerned , Shri A.P. Vishwakarma, Personal Manager, Area Headquarter, WCL, Kanhan Area, Distt . Chhindwara, MP has filed his affidavit . The terms of settlement are as under :

1. that Ku. Shyamwati , dependent daughter ofLate Jhanaklal , Ex. Mining Sirdar shall be offered employment as Security Guard (T) General mazdoor Cat 1 subject to her medical fitness to be decided by Company's Medical Officer and finally verification of antecedents;

2. that the employment shall be offered to Ku . Shyamwati as per clause 1 above within one month of filing of the settlement before CGIT;

3. that sanction of monetary compensation in lieu of employment made to Smt . Agrabai W/ o Ex. employee vide No. WCL/IR/ MP/23 / 1038 dated 12-5-99 shall stand cancelled/withdrawn with effect from the date of signing of this settlement .

4. Copy of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi as per rules .

C.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

का. आ. 3228.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, न्यूकलियर फ्यूल कॉमपलेक्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या 40/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल. 42012/217/2002- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 S.O. 3228. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 40/2003 ) ofthe Cent. Govt. Indus . Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of Nuclear Fuel 10008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Complex, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L-42012/ 217/2002 - IR (CM -II) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT : Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LLB . , Presiding Officer

Datod the Ist day of November , 2004

Industrial Dispute No. 40/2003

BETWEEN :

Sri L. Satyanarayana,

Petitioner

39-128, Sanbay Gandhinagar, Guru Gutta . Near Jagatgirigutta, Hyderabad.

AND

The Chief Executive ,

Nuclear Fuel Complex , Hyderabad.

Respondent

AFPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : Sri K. Balagopal , Advocate

For the Respondent : Sri R.S. Murthy, Advocate

AWARD

feel ill and was diagnosed to be suffering from Manic Depressive Psychosis . That the disease has the effect that the patient withdraws totally from reality and is incapacitated from perceiving and responding to reality in a rational and responsible way. For this reason it was beyond the capacity of the Petitioner to seek leave from the Respondent establishment. However, for the long duration of treatment that the Petitioner took, his brother L. Anjaiah sent letters periodically to the Respondent establishment explaining the reason for the Petitioner's absence and seeking their indulgence . He could not afford costly treatment and he took treatment with locally accessible private doctors who have specialized in mental disorders and tried his luck with traditional methods of cure at Gajwel in Medak District. Originally he took treatment from Dr. C. A.K. Naidu , a psychiatrist attached to the M.G.M. Hospital at Warangal who treated him from 17-5-1982 to 18-9-1982 after diagnosing his disease as Depression and certified him fit for resuming his normal duties from 19-9-82 . However, the Petitioner had an immediate relapse and consulted one Dr. T.R.V. Rao , Specialist in Mental disorders at Hyderabad and took treatment between September, 1982 and May, 1985 and from 22-6-88 to 30-8-90 . He was certified to be fit to attend duty from 31-8-90 . When he went to Respondent establishment on 31-8-90 he was informed that he was removed from service as far back as 16-6-83 . Due to his illness his family was not staying continuously at the Jagatgirigutta address , but was moving between that address and their ancestral village. That is why, notices could not be served to him . He made an appeal against the order but still it was dismissed on unreasonable delay. The Petitioner not even aware of the legal procedures , sent complaints to various political authorities at the State and National level , including Prime Minister of India. In this process a lot of time was consumed. Hence , the said delay, but not intentional and wanton.

The Government of India , Ministy of Labour by its Order No. L -42012/217/2002 - IR( CM. II) dated 13-3-2003 referred the following dispute under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the employers in relation to the Management of Nuclear Fue! Complex and their workman .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Nuclear Fuel Complex , Hyderabad in terminating the scrvices of Sri L. Satyanarayana , Helper B Grade from service on the ground of absenteeism is legal andjustified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

This reference was registered as Industrial Dispute No 40/2003 and notices were issued to the parties .

2. The brief facts as averred in the claim statement are That the Petitioner joined as Helper - B Grade on 23-10-1973 . He worked till 15-5-1982 without any remarks . In the year 1979 he applied for the post of Tradesman-A Grade in the Respondent establishment as found suitable and placed in the selected It is true to say that against future vacancies . On 15-5-1982 the Petitioner

3. A counter was filed stating that he was appointed in 1973 under the scale of pay Rs . 75.95 initially in 1973 and was holding the revised scale of pay Rs . 200-3-206- 4-234- EB-4-250 on the date of removal of his service . He has remained absent unauthorisedly from 15-5-1982 for his unauthorized absence from 15-5-1982. The said charge memo was received by the Petitioner on 2-9-82 . He did not submit any written statement . The Enquiry Officer was appointed . Notice of enquiry was duly sent to his last known address . He did not participate in the enquiry. Accordingly, the enquiry was held ex - parte and the Petitioner was removed from service from 16-6-83 . He did not submit any appeal against the Penalty till September , 1990. More than 5 years leave is not permissible unless the President of India otherwise determines. Removal was also published in the Gazette . Two certificates produced by him shows that he availed treatment upto 18-9-92 simultaneously from Warangal and 10009 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

ofservice deliberately and wantonly. That the enquiry file was weeded out by the efflux of time as per the retention schedule after the stipulated period of 3 years . He marked various documents Ex.M1 to Ex.M17 .

Hyderabad. The appeal was rejected as being time barred and he gave a complaint to RLC ( C) on 19-4-2002 . The Ministry of Labour and Employment found it fit to refer the case. Hence, the petition may be dismissed.

8. In the cross-examination he deposed it is not true to suggest that on 15-5-82 WWI lost consciousness in the premises of Respondent and was physically shifted to his house. On the contrary he absented unauthorisedly on 15-5-82 also .

4. Usuallywhenever an enquiry is held, the validity of the domestic enquiry conducted is to be determined first before allowing the parties to lead evidence. However, in this case no such exercise could be made as the Respondent could not file any material papers pertaining to the enquiry said to have conducted by the Management and the correct procedure would have been to permit the Management to lead evidence but however , by over sight and none have not brought to my notice and the Petitioner was allowed to lead evidence . The Petitioner examined himself and another witness and the Management examined one witness .

5. The Petitioner deposed in the chief examination that he joined the Respondent establishment on 23-10-1973 and he narrated the story of his sickness. In the cross -examination he deposed that he received a memo dated 24-11-81 about his absenting from duty. He denied that he was served with memo of charges on 26-8-82 .

6. He examined his brother Sri L. Anjaiah as WW2 and he said about the treatment of his brother WW1 . In the cross -examination he deposed that his brother could not recognize anyone after regaining conscious in the year 1982. It is not true to suggest that the Petitioner was doing business with him and now he wants to join the job .

9. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the absence ofthe Petitioner was not wanton but due to ill -health. That as soon as he was advised that he was fit on 28-8-90 he went to the Respondent and asked to be permitted to join the duty. When that was rejected he was served with the letter of termination . He immediately filed appeal Ex.M5 and that was rejected he made another representation for review of the decision, which is Ex.M11 dated 7-1-91 . After that was rejected he was engaged in petitioning various authorities . May be that effort was ill - advised, but he can not be accused of having slept over the matter. Ex. W4 to W9 the medical certificates and prescriptions which amply attest to the treatment taken by the Petitioner. That all the medical certificates signed by the medical practitioner, stamped and counter - signed by another medical practitioner. Their names are identifiable. That according to Modi's Medical Jurisprudence & Toxicology, 22nd Edition which shows thatin all cases of Psychosis , there is loss of contact with reality, as asserted by the petitioner. The certificates are attested by three different medical practitioners , working at Osmania hospital , Niloufer hospital and Gandhi hospital respectively. How can all these would have been colluded and conspired with this penniless and jobless man . That as MWI says that he dogs not remember whether WW1's brother WW2 wrote any letter ataut his brother. So it may be deemed that he has sent letters. The Respondent claimed that he sent notice of the charge to the Petitioner. No postal acknowlegement is filed. That as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Shanker Chakravarthi Vs. Britannia Biscuit Co. Lld . , 1979 II LLJ page 194, that if such a request is made by the management atthe first instance it must necessarily be granted by the Court , and if it is made later in the proceedings it may be granted, but there must be a request from the Management for leading evidence in proof of misconduct. The case of the Petitioner is established that no enquiry was conducted at all . That the plea of abandonment of service is not correct because the abandonment of service should be conscious and voluntary. Ifthe workman is prevented from joining duty, there is no abandonment of service . In Bata India Ltd. , Vs. B.H. Nathanni , 1978 Lab I.C. 386 , a workman had overstayed leave because he suffered fracture of leg in a foreign country. His services were terminated under the relevant Standing Orders . But even though he

was able to communicate the doctor's certificate only after 7. The Management examined Sri A. Pappachan , Administrative Officer as MW1 and he deposed that the petitioner was appointed as helper on 23-10-73 in the scale of pay of Rs . 75-95 . The scale was revised as Rs . 200- 250. The Petitioner having employed in the central government and holds a civil post under the central government and governed by Central Civil Services Rules. The Petitioner while working as helper in Zircaloy Fabrication Plant stayed away from the duties from 15-5-1982 without any information or permission thereafter . That the Company is having a duty medical officer for the purpose of medical attendance including recommendation of medical leave . A charge memo dated 26-8-82 was issued to his address and the same was admitted by the Petitioner . The Petitioner having not responded after watching for a long time, an Enquiry Officer was appointed on 10-2-83 to investigate the factual position. The Petitioner or his representatives did not turn up and after the Enquiry Officer submitted his report he was removed from service on 16-6-1983 . That is the Petitioner sent a communication on September , 1990 after a lapse of 8 years mentioning that he was under medical treatment in various hospitals from 15-5-82 to 30-8-90 . When the Petitioner is entitled to receive medical attendance from the duty medical officer and also receive specialist treatment for any disease in this connection . That his brother also did not inform . It is abandonment

3606 Gl/04-53 10010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] his termination, a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court held such termination to be unsustainable . In the instant case , there was no abandonment of service on the part of the appellant .

10. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondent that the maximum period of leave that can be availed by a permanent employees under Rule 12 is 5 years . It is only the President who could intervene to sanction leave exceeding 5 years in exceptional cases .He absented himself from 15-5-82 to 30-8-90 simultaneously withMedical Certificate of doctors and certificate of fitness on 30-8-1990 . The same cannot be conceded as minor discrepancy. The ailment diagnosed as " Manic Depressive Psychosis " is not justification to evade compliance when the claimant is being taken case especially by his brother. The claimant relied on Ex. W10 to W15 purported to be postal receipts and acknowledgements addressed to the Respondents on 22-5-82 , 8-7-82 , 22-7-82 , 29-6-83 , 28-8-83 , 15-5-89 and the text of representations which have been purported to have been dispatched to the Respondents have been deliberately left to mislead the Hon'ble Tribunal on the ground of illiteracy. Hence, he is not entitled for any relief. He also relied on the Judgement 1 LLJ 1992 page 583 of Madras High Court . The brief facts of the case are that the employee absented from duty from November, 1978 to January 1979. He reported for duty on 28-1-79 and produced a medical certificate. Where the government refused to refer the matter and the High Court also did not come to any rescue . As no doubt latches on the part of the Petitioner , and due to non explanation for the delay in filing Writ Petition. He therefore prays thatthe Petitioner is not entitled for any relief.

two attempts were made , the meeting with Additional Secretary and representing the matter to him and going all the way to Bombay to represent him again and again, representingHon'ble Vice President of India when he came to visit Apollo Hospital . When he did not have any effect he made further representation to the President of India, to the Prime Minister of India . That may be so . Instead of directly approaching the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) , he has been approaching the higher- ups . When somebody could have informed if he had asked any of the union leaders or any of the employees they would have informed him to approach the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C) . But he choose some other method of approaching very high dignitaries . So it is also shows that no doubt he must have recovered from his illness but still some grievance continues in him and instead of following the normal procedure he has been approaching higher -ups . He is aged about 50 years and almost 22 to 23 years, he was out of job , 8 years and odd due to his ill -health and keeping quite for 11 or 12 years or making representations to the higher - ups , not aproaching the appropriate forum. It is not desirable to reinstate him and give a job . By now, he is about 51 years old, but however, seeing the peculiar circumstances of his mental condition as he has worked for almost 9 years , I am of the opinion , that some compensation can be paid to him . So far as his dismissal is concerned it appears to be legal and justified because it is for his brother WW2 Sri L. Anjaiah, who is in toddy business at Jagadgirigutta, Hyderabad only. He should have known and instead of that he went on taking WW1 to various other places like Warangal etc. Therefore , 1 hold that the action of the Management of Nuclear Fuel Complex, Hyderabad in terminating the services of Sri L. Satyanrayana , Helper- B Grade from service on the ground of absenteeism is legal andjustified. However, in the peculiar circumstances , as the Petitioner has put in 9 years of service and suffered mental illness and undergone lot of sufferings and as the quality of mercy is not strained, I am of the opinion that in the peculiar circumstances it would not be unjustified to order a lumpsum compensation of Rs . 20,000 to the Petitioner. Hence , the reference is ordered that the action is legal and justified , however, the Petitioner is entitled for a compensation of Rs . 20,000 .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 1st day of November, 2004.

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner :

Witnesses examined for the Respondent:

MW1 : Sri A. Pappachan

WWI : Sri L. Satyanaryana

11. It may be noted that for arguments sake even if it is admitted that what the Petitioner says is correct that from 1982 to 1990 he was sick , it may be seen that even if he was unfit , the Respondent after having informed by his brother WW2 on 28-8-83 he thought it fit not to inform for another almost five years till 15-5-89 . This attitude itself goes to show that the Petitioner's brother was also not serious about his job . WW1 also admitted that he had received memo dated 24-11-81 about absenting from duty. BE that may be so. The Petitioner says that he reported for duty on 31-8-90 , and he says that he met Additional Secretary during the year 1991 , when his file was not sent he went in person to Bombay and met him. In the year 1995 when the Vice President of India came to visit Apollo Hospital he gave a representation when his representations were forwarded to the Labour Ministry, the dispute concerning his termination was taken up for adjudication . So it may be seen that this person has been taking up his cause and has met Additional Secretary and the Hon'ble Vice President of India and not that he kept quite . The same is not challenged in the cross examination. So it can be safely presumed that his absence from 1982 to 1990 was due to his mental illness . But after 1991 only WW2: Sri L. Anjaiah 10011 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex . M5 Copy of representation of WW1 of September, 1990.

Ex. W1 Appointed order dated 23-10-73

Ex . M6 Copy of notification of order dt. 16-6-83.

Ex. W2 Certificate of WWl's service by Zircalloy Fabrication Plant of NFC of July, 1979.

Ex . M7 Copy of Order No. NFC/PA.V/ 2606/ 1860/ 165 dt. 10-2-83.

Ex. W3 : Interview Call letter to WW1 by NFC dt . 29-6-80

Ex. M8 Copy of Order No. NFC/PA.V/ 2606 /1860/ 647dt. 25-5-83.

Ex. W4 : Medical Certificate by Dr. C.A.K. Naidu dt. 18-9-82

Ex . M9 : Copy of Abstract of Rule 12 of CCS (Leave) Rules , 1972

Ex . M10: Copy of Industrial Leave Rules Ex. W5 Prescription slip by Dr. T.R.V. Rao , dt. 17-5-83

Ex . M11 : Copy of representation dt. 7-1-91 Ex. W6 : Prescription slip by Dr. T.R.V. Rao , dt. 20-5-85

Ex . M12 : Copy of medical certificate issued by Dr. C.A.K. Naidu dt. 18-9-82 .

Ex. W7 Prescription slip by Dr. T.R.V. Rao , dt . 22-6-89

Ex . M13 : Copy of medical certificate issued by Dr. T.R. V. Rao , dt. 18-5-82 .

Ex. W8 Medical fitness certificate issued by Dr. T.R.V. Rao, dt . 30-8-90

Ex. M14 : Copy of medical certificate issued by Dr. T.R.V. Rao , dt . 20-5-85.

Ex. W9 Medical fitness certificate issued by Dr. Nilkantharaj Yadav, dt. 28-8-90

Ex . M15 : Copy of medical certificate issued by Dr. T.R.V. Rao , dt. 22-6-88 .

Ex. W10 : Postal receiptdt. 22-7-82

Ex. W11 : Postal receipt dt. 22-7-82

Ex . M16 : Copy of medical certificate issued by Dr. T.Nilkant Ray Yadav,dt. 28-8-90 .

Ex . W12: Postal receiptdt . 29-6-83

Ex . M17 : Copy of Ir. No. NFC / PAR/ 90/ 2296 , dt. 11-10-90 .

Ex. W13 : Postal receiptdt. 15-5-89

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004 Ex. W14 : Postal receipt dt . 8-7-82 Ir . to the Manager (P&A), NFC

Ex. WI5 : Postal acknowledgement of registered letter sent to manager dt . 28-8-83

Ex. W16: Copy of postal receipt

Ex. W17 : Postal receipt

का. आ. 3229. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, जवाहर लाल इन्सटीट्यूट ऑफ पोस्ट ग्रेजुएशन मेडिकल एजुकेशन एण्ड रिसर्च के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई (संदर्भ संख्या 84/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Ex. W18 : Order removing WW1 from service dt. 16-6-83

Ex. W19: Order rejecting WW1's appealdt. 9-10-90

[सं. एल. 42012/ 250/2002- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 Ex. W20 : Order rejecting review of the same dt. 30-1-91

Ex. W21 : Copy of Failure reprt of ALC( C), dt . 6-8-2002

Ex. W22 : Copy to minutes of conciliationdt . 3-7-2002 Documents marked for the Respondent

Ex. M1 Copy of Memodt . 24-11-81

Ex. M2 : Copy of retention schedule reg. weeding of service records

S.O. 3229.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 84/2003) of the Central Govt. Indus . Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Chennai , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of Jawahar Lal Institute of Post Graduation Medical Education and Research and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

Ex . M3 Copy of Ir. No. 05A. 02.2856 dt . 30-12-81

[No. L-42012/250/2002 - IR( CM- II) ] N.P. KESHAVAN, Desk Officer Ex. M4 Copy of Ir . No. 05A. 02.2856 dt . 23-1-82 10012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Thursday, the 9th September, 2004

PRESENT

K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer.

Industrial Dispute No. 84/2003

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clasue ( d) of sub - section ( 1) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduation Medical Education & Research and their workmea)

BETWEEN

Sri Subburayan Kuppuswamy

.... I Party/Petitioner

AND

The Director,

Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduation Medical Education & Research, Pondicherry.

... II Party/Management

APPEARANCE:

For the Workman :M/ s . S. Vaidyanathan & M. Rajendran , Advocates

For the Management Mr. M. T. Arunan , Advocate.

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L -42012 /250 / 2002 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 08-05- 2003 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

"Whether the punishment of dismissal from service imposed upon Shri Subburayan Kuppuswamyby the Management of Jawaharalal Institute of Post Graduation Medical Education & Research ( JIPMER ) is lega ! and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. Afte , the receipt of the reference , it was taken on Ke as L.D. N. 84/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the partics entered appearance through heir advocates and filed their Claim Statement and wowy Statement respectively

3 The aliegations in the Claim Statement filed by the Power arcus de as follows :

The Petitioner joined the Respondent hospital on 23-3-1983 as safaiwala . The Petitoner had to submit leave application to the Director through proper channel, since he was unwell. Unfortunately, the Respondent issued charge sheet and after receipt of the Petioner's explanation denying the charges , farce of enquiry was conducted . The Petitioner attended the enquiry on 13-2-98 and denied the charges mentioned in the charge sheet and explained his health condition and showed case records of SSHC to Enquiry Officer for not attending the duty. The enquiry authority accepted the same but found that the charges framed against the Petitioner have been proved. Only due to sudden death of the Petitioner's father, the Petitioner was forced to shift his residence to different place and he was not able to get official communication in time . The Petitioner being an illiterate and Group D staff, he could not intimate the place of shifting and the new address for communication. Subsequently, the Petitioner fell ill and he was not able to walk steadily. He was suffering from chest pain, non- radiating , pin prickling , left sided , vomiting, sweating, fever, Shivering, Asthma, giddiness etc. and he had sent leave application to the Director in time. But, he was not aware of the fate of the leave applications . Only due to his sickness and treatment received for sickness , he was not able to attend his duties . The Enquiry Officer has come to the conclusion that the Petitioner has failed to inform the higher authorities about the change of address and therefore, the findings of the Enquiry Officer is not valid in law. The Disciplinary Auhtority also imposed the punishment which is not valid in law. The Appellate Authority confirmed the order of the major penalty of removal from service . The action initiated by the Respondent authorities is not valid in law and cannot be sustained. Oral enquiry cannot be conducted unless charge sheet is issued. Further , the delinquent employee should be given an opportunity which is real and adequate and not for namesake . When the enquiry authority concludes the enquiry ex parte , he should state reasons as to why he is proceeding ex parte and what steps he has taken to persuade the charge official to take part in the enquiry proceedings. In this case, the Petitioner has not been given any reasonable opportunity to defend his case . Moreover the enquiry authority has not taken any steps to enable the Petitioner to participate in the enquiry proceedings . The Enquiry Officer has not considered the genuine reasons of sickness for absence from duty but he had exceeded the scope of enquiry and recorded that he has violated rule 3 (i)( iii ) of CCS Rules. The Appellate Authority has not applied his judicious mind but on the other hand , he has acted in a biased manner. The Appellate Authority has passed orders on the appeal ; after a lapse of 23 months which is too long period to pronounce his decision . The extreme punishment of removal from service is harsh and therefore, the Tribunal may be pleased to interfere with the punishment under Section 11A of the Act. Even after the enquiry the 10013 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Petitioner was admitted in the Respondent hospital and he was discharged only in August , 2003. Hence , for all these reasons , the Petitioner prays to declare the order passed by the Respondent authorities as illegal and consequently direct the Respondent/Management to reinstate him in service w.e.f. 17-12-98 with back wages , continuity of service and other attendant benefits .

informed that he was absent in view of his health condition, but he has not submitted any leave application or medical certificate for his ill health. The Disciplinary Authority after going through the evidence and after careful consideration of enquiry report and other related documents has imposed the penalty of removal from service on the Petitioner. Even the appeal preferred by the Petitioner was rightly rejected by the Appellate Authority. The Petitioner even after rejoining the duties remained absent for more than two years and he did not utilise the opportunity extended to him. Once again he absented for duty while the disciplinary proceedings was inprogress.Had he been proper in coming for duty without absenting for the second time, he would not have been faced the penalty of removal from service and it is only because ofhis own 2nd deeds he met with this end. Though he was charge sheeted twice on 11-6-97 and on 9-9-98 the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry for the first charge sheet and submitted the report of the enquiry and the action for the 2nd charge sheet was not necessitated as the charges in the first charge sheet itself was deemed to be proved and he was awarded the penalty in order dated 17-12-98. The Petitioner was very irregular and he has not felt his responsibilities and therefore , for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

5. In these circumstances , the point for my determination is-

(i ) "Whether the punishment of dismissal from service imposed upon the Petitioner by the Respondent/Management is legal and justified?"

(ii) "To what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?"

Point No. 1 :

6. In this case, it is admitted by the Petitioner that hewas absented from duty from 20-7-95 and he was issued with charge sheet on 11-6-97 for which he denied the charge and an enquiry was conducted in which he appeared on 13-2-98 and alleged his absence was only due to health condition. In this case, on the side of the Petitioner Ex. WI to W13 were marked which are copy ofmemo issued to the Petitioner on 11-6-97, copy of the letters givenby the Petitioner to Respondent/Management dated 16-10-97 , 03-12-97 and 04-12-97 and Ex. W5 is the copy of memo of Respondent dated 9-9-98 and Ex. W6 is the copy ofEnquiry Officer's report and Ex. W7 is theorder ofDisciplinary Authority issued to the Petitioner on 17-12-98 and Ex. W8 is the copy of the order of Appellate Authority issued to Petitioner on 9-12-2000 . Ex. W9 to W13 are dispute raised before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) and counter filed by Respondent before him in that proceedings. The Petitioner has not examined any witness on his side . Similarly, the 4. As against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research is not an industry and it is a teaching post graduate institute with attached hospital functioning under direct administrative control of Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Therefore , the employees of the Respondent/Management are not bound by rules and regulations of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Therefore , this claim is not maintainable before this Tribunal . No doubt , the contention of the Petitioner that he was absent from duty w.e.f. 20-7-95 without any leave application is true . He was recalled for duty vide memo dated 18-10-96, but he did not rejoin duty. He was also asked to appear before the medical board to assess his illness in memo dated 4-4-97 and 16-4-97. But he neither reported for duty nor appeared before medical board . Therefore, he was charge sheeted vide memo No. Estt . 13(18 )/97 dated 11-6-97 for his unauthorised absence as per provisions governed under CCS ( Classification, Control and Appeal ) Rules , 1965. The Disciplinary Authority appointed the Enquiry Officer to enquire into charges framed against the Petitioner. The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry in accordance with the procedure laid down under CCS ( Classification , Control and Appeal ) Rules , 1965 and it is false to allege that no opportunity was given to the Petitioner. In the meantime, the Petitioner in his letters dated 16-10-97 and 3-12-97 requested the Respondent/Management to permit him to re-join duty and the Petitiner assured in his letter dated 3-12-97 that ifhe is permitted to rejoin duty, he will not avail leave in future without prior permission or intimation and he will cooperate fully without any prejudice to the disciplinary action initiated against him. But , even in spite of that assurance, he remained absent for duty w.e.f. 29-4-98 withour proper leave application while the disciplinary proceedings was in progress for which action, he was again charge sheeted under Rule 14 of CCS ( Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules , 1965 vide memo No. Estt . 13(23)/98 dated 9-9-98 for his lapse for second time. The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry in accordance with the procedure for the first chage sheet against the Petitioner . The enquiry was not decided on ex-parte as claimed by the petitioner . The Enquiry Officer submitted his report dated 11-11-98 in which he has clearly stated that the charge against the Petitioner has been duly proved. The copy of the report of the Enquiry Officer was endorsed to the Petitioner and the Petitioner accepted the findings of the Enquiry Officer in his letter dated 7-12-98 and 10014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

Respondent marked 8 documents which are charge sheets issued to Petitioner dated 11-6-97 and 9-9-98 as Ex . MI and M4 respectively. The enquiry report of the Enquiry Officer is marked as Ex . M5 . The penalty order passedby the Disciplinary Authority on 17-12-98 is marked as Ex . M6 . Similarly order of the Appellate Authority confirming the penalty is marked as Ex . M7 and copy of the failure report is marked as Ex .M8 .

7. The learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that the chronology of events that charge sheet issued on 9-9-98 and reminder for defence reply sent on 9-11-98 and enquiry report submitted on 11-11-98 and the Disciplinary Authority has endorsed the copy of enquiry report by his letter dated 26-11-98 and imposition of major penalty by an order dated 17-12-98 and these events show that oral enquiry has begun prior to issuance of charge sheet which is violative of disciplinary proceedings and the Petitioner was not given any reasonable opportunity to defend his case .

8. But, as against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that it is false to allege that charge sheet was issued on 9-9-98 . The first charge sheet was issued on 11-6-97 and only the 2nd charge sheet was issued on 9-9-98 . The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry in accordance with the procedure laid down under Central CivilServices (Classification , Control and Appeal) Rules , 1965 for the first charge sheet alone and the Petitioner appeared before the Enquiry Officer during the enquiry held on 13-2-98 . Therefore , it is false to allege that enquiry was decided as ex parte as claimed by the Petitioner. The Enquiry Officer has submitted his report on 11-11-1998 inwhich he has concluded that the charges framed against the petitioner are deemed to be proved and a copy of the report of Enquiry Officer was endorsed to the Petitioner by a letter dated 26-11-98 for his defence or submission . For this , the Petitioner sent a reply on 7-12-98 in which he has accepted the findings of the Enquiry Officer and informed that he was absent from duty only due to his ill health. But, he has not submitted any leave application or medical certificate for his ill health . Further, even while the disciplinary proceedings are pending against the petitioner, he cannot absent from duty w.e.f. 29-4-98 without proper leave application or without any sanction . Therefore, again he was charge sheeted on 9-9-98. The Petitioner in his claim Statement has alleged that he has received charge sheet only on 9-9-98 which is a second charge sheet issued to him since the first charge sheet itself has been proved against the Petitioner, there is no necessity to go into the second charge sheet and he was awarded with penalty of removal from service by an order dated 17-12-98 and therefore , there was no pre- dctermination or illegality committed by the Enquiry Officer or the Disciplinary Authority.

9. Again , the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that the enquiry was conducted ex parte and the

[PART II-SBC . 3 ( ii) ] Enquiry Officer has not recorded any reason for conducting the enquiry proceedings ex parte. Further, he has not taken any steps to enable the Petitioner to participate in the enquiry proceedings . It is also alleged that the Enquiry Officer has not considered the genuine reason of sickness for absence from duty, but has exceeded the scope of enquiry and recorded by not informing his higher authorities , his permanent residential address and often changing his residential address without informing his competent authority about his residential address for communication and by absenting himself from duty from 20-7-95 without prior sanction of leave and thus , he has violated Rule 3 ( i) ( iii) of CCS Rules , 1964 .

10. But, 1 find there is no point in the contention ofthe learned counsel for the Petitioner because since the Petitioner appeared before the Enquiry Office on 13-2-98 and he has pleaded that he was absented from duty for his illness , even before the enquiry or even before this Tribunal , he has not produced any document to show that hewas affected by ill -health . On the other hand,from the enquiry proceedings , it is found that the Respondent authorities have issued memos to appear before the Medical Board , but the Petitioner has refused to receive the memo and he neither appeared before the Medical Board nor has given any application for leave for his long absence . Under such circumstances , I find there is no substance in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that he was affected by ill-health .

11. Again, the learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that due to sudden death of the Petitioner's parents, the Petitioner was forced to shift his residence to different places and he was not able to get oficial communication in time . It is further allegation that being an illiterate and Group D employee , he could not intimate the place of shifting and the new address for communication and he fell ill and was not able to walk steadily and he was affected from so many complications and though he had sent several leave applications to the Director in time, he was not aware of the fate of the leave applications whether it had been recommended or not and therefore, it cannot be said that he was absented for duty without any leave application or information.

12. But , here again , I find there is no substance in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner because though he has shifted his residence , it is clear thathe has not informed his new address to the authorities . Anyhow, from the equiry proceedings , it is clear that the Medical Board has issued a memo to the Petitioner to appear before the Board for medical examination which memo has been refused by the Petitioner and no reason was given by the Petitioner for refusing this memo issued by the medical board . Further, even though he alleged that he has sent several leave applications to the Director intime, he has not produced any document to show that 10015 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

16. In view of my foregoing findings that the punishment of dismissal from service imposed by the Respondent authorities against the Petitioner is legal and justified, I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief as prayed for . No Costs .

17. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, correctedand pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 9th September, 2004. )

he has applied for leave for the period of his absence and further, he has not produced any medical certificate to substantiate his claim that he was affected by ill-health . Under such circumstances , the stand taken by the Petitioner in the claim petition is only to wriggle out the situation. Though, he has stated that he was treated in the Respondent hospital , he has not produced any document to substantiate his claim . Under such circumstances , 1 find the Petitioner has not established before this Tribunal that he has got reason for his non - attendance.

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses examined :

: None

Oneither side

Documents Marked

For the I Party /Workman

13. Then, the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that even assuming that the charges are proved, the extreme punishment of removal from service is harsh and therefore , he prays that this Tribunal may be pleased to interfere with the punishment under section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and reduce the punishment .

Ex. Date Description

No.

W1 11-06-97 Xerox copy of the memo issued to Petitioner.

W2 16-10-97 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Director of Respondent .

W3 03-12-97 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Director of Respondent.

W4 04-12-97 Xerox copy of the joining report of Petitioner.

W5 09-09-98 Xerox copy of the memo issued to Petitioner.

W6 11-11-98 Xerox copy of the letter from Enquiry OfficertoRespondent enclosing enquiry report.

W7 17-12-98 Xerox copy of the order of Disciplinary Authority.

W8 09-12-00 Xerox copy of the order of the Appellate Authority.

W9 18-12-01 Xerox copy of the 2A petition filed by Petitioner.

14. But, for this argument, the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that the Respondent / Management has taken disciplinary action against the Petitioner for the first charge sheet and in the mean time , the Petitioner has given a representation that he may be permitted to rejoin the duty and under such circumstances , theRespondent/Management has allowed to do so without prejudice to the disciplinary action already initiated against the Petitioner and thus , he was allowed to rejoin duty on 4-12-1997 but subsequently also he remained absent for more than two years . But , he did not utilise the opportunity extended to him and he once again , absented for duty while the disciplinary proceedings was in progress and had he been proper in coming for duty without absenting for the second time , he would not have faced the penalty of removal from service and it is only because ofhis own deeds he met with this end and only because of that the Disciplinary Authority has taken a serious step because the Petitioner is a habitual absentee for duty and even while he was given an undertaking that he will not absent for duty without any leave application and even while the disciplinary proceedings pending against him , he again absented for duty without any leave application unauthorisedly. Under such circumstances , the provisions of Section 11A should not be invoked in this case .

W10 04-03-02 Xerox copy of the letter of Petitioner to Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)

W11 18-02-02 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central).

W12 22-04-02 Xerox copy of the Counter Statement filed by Respondent before Assistant Labour Commissioner. 15. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent because even though he has stated so many reasons in the Claim petition for his absence , he has not produced any document to show that the absence was only due to his illness . Under such circumstances , I find the absence of the petitioner is chronic and he should not be allowed to continue in service as contended by the Respondent/Management. As such, I find this point against the Petitioner .

W13 08-05-02 Xerox copy of the rejoinder filed by Petitioner.

Point No. 2 :

W14 18-06-03 Xerox copy of the reply statement filed by Respondent/Management.

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

10016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926

For the II Party/ Management :

Date

Description

Ex No.

11-00-97 Xerax copy of the charge sheet issued to Petitioner.

2 03-12-97 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Director of Respondent .

1610-97 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner to Director of Respondent .

A4 04-09-98 Xerox copy of the 2nd charge sheet issued to Petitioner .

1111-98 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Dy. Director of the Respondent/ management.

M6 17-12-98 Xerox copy of the order of penalty imposed on Petitioner.

(09.12-98 Xerox copy of the order of Appellate Authority Confirming the penalty order.

M8 22-09-02 Xerox copy of the failure of conciliation report.

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

का. आ. 3230.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , एफ.सी.आई. के पबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी.आईडी. 232/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल. 22013/1/2004- आई . आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004 S.O. 3239.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Covernment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L. C.I.D. Nc 232/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Hyderabad, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the nagement of FCI and their workmen, received by the Central Geroramacaf on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L - 22013/ 1/2004 - IR( C - II) ] N.P. KESHAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT

Shu E. Ismalil B. Sc . , LLB . , Presiding Officer .

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Dated the 31st August , 2004

Industrial Dispute L.C.I.D. No. 232/2001 (Old 1.D. No. 30/1999 transferred from Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Warangal ) BETWEEN

1. Ch. Rajan Babu (Died per LRs ) S/o Ramaiah

2. Ch . Bhavani ,

W/o Late Ch . Rajan Babu , Age : 25 years 3. Ch. Mahesh, S/o Late Ch . Rajan Babu, Age : 5 years

(The applicant No. 3 is minor Rep. by their next friend and natural mother Ch . Bhavani i.e. , applicant No. 2)

4. Ch . Komuramma . W/o Ramaiah , Age : 55 years C/ o Dussa Janardhan , H. No. 1-7-1246, Advocates Colony, Hanamkonda. Petitioners

AND

1. The District Manager, Food Corporation of India, Millers Association Building, Hunter Road, Warangal.

2. The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office , III Floor , HACA Bhavan, Hyderabad.

3. The President, Food Corporation of India , Hamalies Labour Contract Co - op. Society Ltd. , C/ o F.C.I. Godowns , Kazipet

Respondents APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioners M/ s . D. Janardhan , M.V. Raja Reddy, Ch . Lingamurthy , J. Damodhar & J. Yeshwanth Raj , Advocates .

For the Respondents : Ms. B.G. Ravindra Reddy, P. Srinivasulu & B. V. Chandrasekhar, Advocates .

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 by the Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Warangal in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble High [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s. Cotton Corporation of India and two others and transferred to this Court in view of the Government of India, Ministry of Labour's Order No. H- 11026/1/2001- IR( C - II ) dated 18-10-2001 bearing I.D. No. 30/1999 and renumbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 232/2001 .

2. The brief facts as stated in the petition by the Petitioners are : That the Petitioner No. 1 was appointed along with other casual labourers by R1 and R1 used to pay the wages through R3 namely FCI Hamlies Labour Contract Co -operative Society Ltd. , Kazipet , Warangl -3 . The Petitioner No.1 was appointed in January, 1993 as casual labour and he was drawing wages Rs . 16 per day but receiving the wages through R3 . The Petitioner No. 1 worked continuously till the end of 31st March , 1997 and lastly the Petitioner No.1 used to receive a wage ofRs . 46 per day. The FCI Management through R3 used to deduct the part of wages and used to remit by adding the equal amount to the Provident Fund Department and so far such amount has not been refunded to the applicant .

3. It is further submitted that in the year 1997 as per the directions of the Headquarters of Food Corporation of India , New Delhi the R1 issued a circular stating that all the casual labours and Hamalies who worked under the control of the Respondents become the permanent employees and their services shall be regularized. Accordingly, R1 called for the applications from the individual casual labours who worked in the unit of the R1 . The applicant also made an application along with other casual labourers in 1997 itself by seeking regularization in service and permanent appointment . That the Respondent has taken most of the Hamalies and as well as the casual labours into regular service in the year 1997 except few casual labours. R1 and R2 appointed 25 persons in fresh without considering the applications ofthe applicant and whereas the said fresh recruitees did not work as a casual labour in the unit of the R1 at any time. But at the instance of the then executive body of the R3 , R1 misguided R2 and got approved the fresh candidates list for recruitment and regularized their services . R3 intentionally removed the name of the applicant and as well as other persons who worked continuously as casual labours in the unit of R1 at Warangal for more than five years .

10017

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

effected the applicant for an indigent person on the road, which is illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice. That the Petitioner No.1 along with other workers got issue legal notice to the opposite parties but there is no response from their side. That the Petitioner No. 1 died and his LRs are applicants No.2 to 4 are added as per the order in I.A. 68 of 2002 dated 29-10-2002 and hence , the applicants No. 2 to 4 are entitled for back wages since 1-4-1997. Hence , it is prayed to set aside the oral termination dated 31-3-97 of the opposite parties and direct them to reinstate the applicant No.2 into service with full back wages , continuity of service and other attendant benefits .

5. A counter was filed denying that the Petitioner No. 1 was appointed in the month of January, 1993. That the Food Corporation of India did not appoint any casual labour or Hamali . It was R3 , which engaged the labour on need basis and paid wages directly by preferring bills under contract system as per rates , terms and conditions ofthe agreement entered into. As per record -wage registers were audited by the District Co - operative Auditor , produced by the FCI Hamali Labour Contract Co-operative Society Ltd. , Kazipet , the individual Petitioner No.1 was not on the rolls of the society during the years 1994 to 1997 with R3 except for 209 days during February, 1995 , May, 1995 to December, 1995 , January, 1996 and February, 1996 respectively. That if any amount is pending in GPF he should claim from the Provident Fund authorities.

6. As per Food Corporation of India Headquarters ' letter No. IR(L)/32 (21 )/97 dated 5-11-97 the workers already working there for the past tree years and who had worked for at least 9 out of 12 months in the last year and whose EPF deductions were being made will be extended the benefit of Direct Payment System . The Bio- data of each labour presently working in the depots as maintained by the concerned labour Co- operative Society and Food Corporation of India may be obtained in prescribed proforma of Bio-data. That copy of the aforsaid letter has been supplied to Food Corporation of India Workers Union , Kazipet for list of eligible workers for induction . The Society submitted a list of workers in which the name of the Petitioner No. 1 does not find place . It is incorrect to state that the applicant has made any application along with other casual labourers in the year 1997 itself for seeking regularization of his services and for permanent appointment . That only eligible labour has been inducted. It is incorrect that R3 intentionally removed the name of the Petitioner No. 1 as well as the other persons who worked continuously as casual labour in the unit of R1 for more than 5 years. All the allegations are false and baseless. There is no appointment and there is no question of termination . That opposite party No.1 and 2 are functioning as per law and in accordance with the directions of the higher authority from time to time without 10018 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

adopting unfair labour practice . That when the reply notices were being prepared the Petitioner No. 1 rushed to the Hon'ble Court . Hence , he is not entitled for any relief asprayed for.

7. R3 filed a counter stating that the Petitioner No. 1 is not the member of the society of R3 . That the Petitioner No.1 has not submitted his EPF number which goes to show that no deductions were made and the Petitioner No.1 was not a member of the society. That as per the Headquarters' letter dated 5-11-97 Direct Payment System has been introduced in Food Corporation of India owned depots . As he is not a member of the society his name was not forwarded . Hence , he prayed that the petition may be dismissed.

8. The petitioner No.2 , Ch. Bhavani wife of Late Ch . Rajan Babu , Petitioner No.1 examined herself as WW1 and deposed about the Petitioner No. 1. That initially hewas appointed as casual labour in the month of January 1993 and he was being paid Rs . 16 per day. His appointment was continued till 31-3-97 and he was being paid Rs . 46 per day. That as per the direction of the Food Corporation of India, Headquarters , New Delhi, R1 issued a circular stating that all the casual labourers and Hamalies who had worked under control of Respondents become permanent employees and their services will be regularized. Accordingly, he made an application with other casual labourers working under Direct Payment System individually to regularize his services in the year 1997. The Respondent No. 3 intentionally got removed Petitioner No. 1 by influencing R1 and R2 on 31-3-1997. But 25 fresh candidates have been appointed as permanent labourers in the Food Corporation of India godown , Kazipet by ignoring his application . Identity Card is Ex.M1 . That he worked under Mr. Shyam Sunder, Technical Assistant, Mr. Md . Gouse , Dust Operator . That he and others got issued a legal notice , Ex .W2 is the office copy. But no reply was received. Ex. W3 is the Xerox copy. of the death certificate of Petitioner No. 1. She prays that she may be reinstated in the place of her deceased husband.

9. In the cross -examination she deposed that she do not know the Petitioner No.1's duties . It is not true to suggest that he worked under R3 but not R1 . That he had no connection with R3 society at any point of time. She denied the suggestion that he never worked with R1 and R2 . It is not true to suggest that there is no employer and employee relationship between her husband and R1 and R2 and he was never appointed or terminated by R1 and R2 .

12. Sri S. Subramanyam , Assistant Manager in the office of the District Manager, Food Corporation of India, Warangal as MW1 . He deposed in the chief examination that the handling and transport work was entrusted to R3 society on tender basis . A copy of the agreement is marked as Ex.MI. R3 used to engage his own personnel doing the said work and pay them. The corporation has nothing to do with the contract labour . The third Respondent was

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] the contractor during the relevant point of time. While so, the Food Corporation of India workers union had raised an Industrial Dispute which ultimately resulted in a settlement between the corporation and the union. In terms ofthe said settlement the corporation has issued circular dated 5-11-97 which is Ex.M2, providing for introduction ofDirect Payment System. As per the formula given in the said circular , the eligible contract labourers in the order of their seniority were inducted into Direct Payment System. There were 498 contract labourers , the list is Ex.M3 during the relevant time and out of them 419 were inducted which was marked as Ex.M4 into the Direct Payment System as per circular dated 5-11-97 . That the Petitioner No. 1 worked from February, 1995 to February, 1996 with R3 for 209 days only. That the contract labourers were paid their wages by the contractor and he only remitted the provident fund contributions for his employees . As the Petitioner No.1 was only a contract labourer he is not entitled to maintain the present Industrial Dispute. Hence, the Industrial Dispute may be dismissed.

13. In the cross examination, he deposed that he took charge only three months back. 119 casual labourers were taken out of409 workers . They all have come under Direct Payment System. The R3 has not given any aquittance register to their corporation . The mode of work of the casual workers is godown cleaning and other technical operations in the godown. The depot Incharge used to supervise the workers after introducing the Direct Payment System. Prior to the introudction of Direct Payment System their employees used to supervise workers, they are called as technical assistants and dusting operators . It is true that all the casual labourers used to work under the supervision of the dusting operators and technical assistants in the godowns even prior to the introduction of Direct Payment System. But the casual workers were supplied and engaged by the society. It is true that in Ex . M3 the date of appointment of the Hamalies, supervisors and their designations were given in the list and whereas the particulars including designations and appointment of the casual labourers were not mentioned in the list submitted by the R3 society. He is not aware whether R3 raised any dispute after selection ofthe candidates under Direct Payment System . That they have not submitted any document along with counter . That they have not taken the bio -data of the individual candidatesbefore the selection of the workers under Direct Payment System. He denied that the Petitioner No. 1 is eligible for absorption . It is true that there is a signature ofthe thenAssistant Manager of their corporation on the Ex. W1 issued by the Food Corporation of India Hamalies Labour Cooperative Society Limited. He denied that he is deposing falsely.

14. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioners that as per the circular Ex . M2 the office of 10019 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

direction of the Hon'ble Court . R3 society clearly stated in his counter that the Direct Payment System was introduced and implemented to the workers who worked for more than 3 years particularly 9 months out of 12 months prior to April, 1996. Hence, the Petitioner No. 1 is eligible having worked so. That their EPF was also deducted. Ex. M1 is the contract agreement between R2 and R3 for the year 1994 only. They did not submit the latest agreement for the year 1996-97 . Hence, whether there is any agreement held between them in the year 1996-97 is doubtful . When there is no agreement for the year 1996-97 how can the society submit the list for the selection of the candidates under Direct Payment System and how can R1 and R2 consider the list submitted by R3 .Hence , Ex . Ml is in no way concerned with the dispute raised by the applicants against the R1 to R3 . The last agreement was held in the year 1995-96 i.e. , upto 12-11-96 only. But they have not filed any such agreement . So it may be safely concluded that the workers who worked under R1 and R2 till April , 1996 are eligible under Direct Payment System introduced by Respondents . That there is violation of Sec . 25F. Hence the termination dated 31-3-97 is illegal and void.

15.He relied on 2001 LLJ page 201 wherein it was held that the Petitioner No. 1 did complete more than 240 days of service, that Sec . 25F was not complied with, the termination was therefore bad. He also relied on 1996 (3) ALD page 955 wherein it was held that Petitioner No. 1 was appointed on tenure basis giving artificial breaks . Petitioner No. 1's services were terminated refusing renewal and another person appointed . It was held that the Petitioner No. 1 is entitled to protection under Sec . 25F and 25H . He also relied on (2001 ) 1 Supreme Court Cases page 61 , where it was held that the absentee workman was required to join duty by a specific date but when attempted to join duty was prevented from doing so. Held the said standing order would not be used to effect automatic termination of service . Therefore prays that the Petitioner No. 1 be reinstated.

16. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Resopndents that the Petitioner No. 1 was never engaged in the Food Corporation of India at any point of time. The handling and transport work was entrusted to the contractor, namely Food Corporation of India Hamali Labour Contract Co-operative Society Ltd. , Kazipet i.e. , the R3 . Ex. M1 is the copy of the said agreement . The contractor used to engage his own personnel . That R3 is the employer of the Petitioner No. 1 and not R1 and R2 . The identity card was also issued by R3 . That the Food Corporation of India Workers ' Union has raised an Industrial Dispute regarding the contract labourers and the said dispute had resulted in a settlement. Accordingly, a circular was issued dated 5-11-97 absorbing the contract labourers under Direct Payment System subject to the terms and conditions of the settlement . Out of 498 contract the opposite party has introduced Direct Payment System by taking workers into regular service . This Petitioner No. 1 and others were not taken into service and were removed from service illegally. In another way the recommendation of the opposite party No. 3 about 25 members who did not work for a single day in the godown were taken into service by introducing the Direct Payment System to them . The R3 misguided the opposite party Nos . I and 2 and got approved the said candidates list and regularized their services. R3 is mainly responsible for illegal termination of the applicant and others , though there is no valid reason . The Petitioner No. 1 has worked for more than 5 years as casual labour in the godown at Kazipet . The opposite party never issued any notice to the Petitioner No. 1 and no enquiry was held prior to his termination . To the notice dated 13-11-99 there is no reply from their side. That opposite parties admitted that as identity card was issued and EPF was deducted. That opposite party Nos . 1 and 2 selected the casual labourers of the list furnished by R3 . That on the application of the Petitioner No. 1 the following documents were called for: (a) Work slips of the casual labourers of the Kzipet Godown from 1-1-97 to 30-9-2000; (b) attendance register of the casual labourers ; (c) list of the I. D. issued by the opposite party Nos . 2 and 3 ; and (d ) monthly and daily wages register from 1-1-95 to 30-9-2000 . But , even after the directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal they did not produce the documents , so it can be presumed that the opposite parties intentionally suppressed such documentary evidence to avoid to introduce the Direct Payment System to the applicants . The suppression of material documents by the R1 to R3 amounts to suppression of material facts and adverse inference can be drawn against the opposite parties. That the Petitioner No. 1 worked from January, 1993. No enquiry was held and he was dismissed . MW1 only had put in three months of service. He admitted that the casual workers are under the supervision of their employees i.e. , technical assistants and dusting operators . He also admitted that particulars of designation of the appointment of the casual labourers are not mentioned in the list submitted by R3 at the time of selection. He also admitted that the opposite party did not submit any documentary evidence along with counter and no bio -data was taken from individual persons at the time of the selection . That he does not know whether the Petitioner No. 1 had submitted the bio -data at the time of selection under Direct Payment System . He admitted that there is no signature of the opposite party No. 2 on Ex . W1 . He submits that R1 and R2 are saying that the applicant No. 1 had worked only for a few days and at other time they are saying that the Petitioner No. I is not the worker ofthe opposite party and in another stage they are saying that he worked for some days . That the Respondents failed to produce attendance register, payment register, identity card register pertaining to the casual workers. Ri and R2 also failed to submit the said documents in spite of 10020 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] labourers during the relevant period 419 were inducted under Direct Payment System . The Petitioner No. I who did not fit into the system was not taken under Direct Payment System . That the Petitioner No. 1 was never appointed and therefore question of his termination by Food Corporation of India does not arise . He relied on 2001 2 ALD page 205 wherein it was held that daily wage employees cannot claim regular employment , their disengagement from service cannot be construed as violation of Sec. 25F. He also relied on 1989 2 ALD page 420 Division Bench wherein it was held that contract labour working as Hamali Employee contractors of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , they are not entitled to be absorbed as badli fillers of the company without their names being sponsored by employment exchange. So further held such workmen employed through a contractor do not become employees of the company. He also relied on 2000 ( I ) LLJ page 561 wherein the Lordships held Law does not prescribe any time limit for the appropriate Government to exercise its powers under Sec . 10 of the Act. It is not that this power can be exercised at any point oftime and to revive matters which had since been settled . Power is to be exercised reasonably and not in a rational manner . There appears to us to be no rational basis on which the central government has exercised powers in this case after lapse of about 7 years of order dismissing the Petitioner No. 1 from service . He also relied on 1993 FLR ( 67 ) page 70 wherein it was held lapse of over 15 years in approaching the Court -Deprives them remedy available to them in law- Loses their rights as well . He therefore , prays that the petition may be dismissed .

17. It may be seen that the case of the Petitioner No. 1 is that he is working from January 1993 and worked till March , 1997. He and there are 28 other persons like him who have approached this Tribunal . Respondent submitted that this Court has no jurisdiction under Sec . 2A( 2 ) of the A. P. State Amendment Act , of the I. D. Act, 1947. I would like to clarify one position that this is Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court and amendment of Sec . 2A (2 ) of the State Government applies to this Court also . Further, as stated in the beginning itself, the Hon'ble High Court by a Division Bench Judgement has held that the amendment is assented by the President of India and therefore , it is applicable to the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Hyderabad. Hence , 1 hold that this Court has got jurisdiction.

18. While the petition was pending for adjudication before this Court , the Petitioner No. 1 died on 21-3-2001 and his LRs are brought on record as Petitioner No. 2 to 4 as per orders in IA 68/2002 dated 23-9-2002 .

Does view of the identity card Ex. WI issued by R3 it becomes clear that he was working as contract labour under R3 atleast from September, 1993. No doubt , it is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner No. 1 that Ex . M1 is a copy of the agreement for the year 1994-95 only for the contract work of the godowns between R2 and R3 . He submits that there is no agreement filed for 1995 or 1996. Hence, he submits that it can be safely taken as that the Petitioner No. 1 is worker under R1 and R2. It may be seen that previously, the law was that if somebody was engaged by a contractor for prohibited items of contract they would be treated as ipso facto employees of the principal employer . As per Judgement in 2001 ( 1 ) 7 Supreme Court cases page 1 between Steel Authority of India Ltd. and others Vs. National Union Waterfront Workers and others , wherein it was held that, " . not imply the concept of automatic absorption of contract labour by the principal employer on issuance of abolition notification" . Here admittedly Ex. WI is an identity card issued by R3 , signed by R3 and the Assistant Manager of R1 or R2. In fact, R1 and R2 have given the details of the Petitioner No. 1 who has worked only for 133 days . No doubt, even R3 outrightly denied that the Petitioner No. 1 worked with them, they did not produce any attendance register or any documents . Ex. W1 is issued on 10-9-93 byR3 and signedby Assistant Manager, Food Corporation of India . So it cannot be simply brushed aside as if there is no iota of truth in what the Petitioner No. 1 is saying but he is unable to substantiate as to how many days he has worked. One thing is very clear that as Ex. WI was issued on 10-9-93 , so it may be safely presumed that atleast he was working since September , 1993 and the Government has come up with a scheme and it is not known as to why the name of the Petitioner No. 1 was not sent. However, now there is Direct Payment System , I wonder whether still R3 is given contract or not . Be that may be so. In the given circumstances of the case, the Petitioner No. 1 was unable to give his EPF number also and could not prove satisfactorily as to how many days he worked. But , one thing is sure that he did work under R3 for R1 and R2 . It is not the case of RI to R3 that Ex . W1 is a fake one . Hence , it has to be taken as correct . No documents are filed before me to disprove the same . Why such a chance was not given to these persons, when it was given to 419 persons and why they were suddenly given a go-by on 31-3-97 . But as stated earlier in view of the Steel Authority of India case as cited above , they cannot be held as employees of RI and R2 being contract labour under R3 . No doubt , during the pendency of the petition the Petitioner a young man of about 30 years died and Ex . W3 is his death certificate . Ex. Wl is the ID card issued by R3 , so the case of the Respondent does not stand to reason that he worked only in 1995. So , not only that the wife of the deceased who brought herself as LR - I has

deposed that her husband's GPF number is 414.In fact 19. Without going into much claborate discussions itis an admitted fact that as casual labourer the Petitioner No. 1 has worked from January, 1993 to March , 1997. In 419 persons have been regularised and these Petitioner 10021 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

का. आ. 3231. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एफ.सी.आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद . ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी.आई.डी. 239/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 22013/1/2004- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004

S.O. 3231.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1.947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L.C.I.D. 239/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L- 22013 / 1/2004 - IR (C- II) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

No. 1 and 28 others like this Petitioner No. 1 were given a go -by. In fact R3 has gone to the extent that he was not a member at all during 1993 to 1997. This is outrightly false in view of Ex . W1 and that the Petitioner is died. The only way that his LRs who , the first one being young wife of the deceased aged about 26years and minor child aged about 5 years and old mother - in - law aged about 55 years , in the fitness of things I think , I am of the opinion that compensation should be paid to these LRs. As the son of the deceased Petitioner No. 1 is a minor he can not be asked to do job and the wife of the deceased Petitioner No. 1 having minor child and old aged mother- in - law, she can not be asked to work, so she can be compensated. Accordingly, an award is passed directing that R1 and R2 shall pay Rs . 5,000 to Smt . Ch. Bhavani , W/o Late Ch . Rajan Babu , Rs . 5000 to Ch . Mahesh, S /o Late Ch. Rajan Babu , and Rs . 5000 to Smt . Ch. Komuramma , mother of Late Ch . Rajan Babu . R3 shall pay Rs . 3,000 to Smt . Ch. Bhavani , W/ o Late Ch . Rajan Babu , Rs . 3000 to Ch. Mahesh , S /o Late Ch . Rajan Babu , and Rs . 3000 to Smt. Ch . Komuramma, mother of Late Ch. Rajan Babu. The amount payable to the minor child should be paid to his mother Smt . Ch . Bhavani . The said amount shall be paid by R1 , R2 and R3 within 30 days after publication of this Award failing which the concerned will be entitled to receive the amount with 6 % p.a. interest after 30 days of publication of this Award .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dictated to Kum. K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 31st day of August, 2004.

Dated the 31st day of August , 2004 E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.I.D. NO . 239/2001 Appendix of evidence

(Old I. D.No. 20/1999 transferred from Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Warangal) Witnesses examined for the Petitioner No. 1

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

BETWEEN :

WW1 : Smt . Ch. Bhayani MWI : Sri S. Subramanyam

Documents marked for the Petitioner No. 1

1. Narmetta Ramesh (Died per LRs ) S/o Rajaiah

Ex . WI : Identity card dt . 10-9-93

2. Narmetta Kamala , W/o Late Ramesh , Age : 24 years Ex . W2: Copy of legal noticedt. 13-11-99 to the Respondents

3. Narmetta Srujana, D/o Late Ramesh , Age : 9 years Ex. W3 : Copy of death certificate of Petitioner No. 1

4. Narmetta Srikanth S/o Late Ramesh, Age : 7 years

Documents marked for the Respondent

Ex. M1 : Copy of tender application , agreement papers

5. Narmetta Suresh , S/o Late Ramesh, Age : 3 years

Ex. M2: Copy of Ir . No. IR(L )/319 (21 ) /97 dt. 5-11-97

(Theapplicant Nos . 3 to 5 are minors . Rep . by their next friend and natural mother N. Kamala i.e. , applicant No. 2)

Ex. M3: Copy of list of 419 workers who were taken under Direct Payment System 10022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 6. Narmetta Buchamma, W/o Rajaiah , Age : 55 years

deduct the part of wages and used to remit by adding the equal amount to the Provident Fund Department and so far such amount has not been refunded to the applicant .

C/ o Dussa Janardhan ,

H. No. 1-7-1246 , Advocates Colony, Hanamkonda .

... Petitioners

AND

1. The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Millers Association Building, HunterRoad, Warangal.

2. The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, Regional Office , IIIrd Floor, HACA Bhavan , Hyderabad

Respondents

3. The President , Food Corporation of India , Hamalies Labour Contract Co - op . Society, C/ o F.C.I. Godowns , Kazipet .

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner No. 1 : M/s . D. Jarnardhan , M. V. Raja

3. It is further submitted that in the year 1997 as per the directions ofthe Headquarters of Food Corporation of India, New Delhi the R1 issued a circular stating that all the casual labourers and Hamalies who worked under the control of the Respondents become the permanent employees and their services shall be regularized . Accordingly , R1 called for the applications from the individual casual labours who worked in the unit of the R1 . The applicant also made an application along with other casual labourers in 1997 itself by seeking regularization in service and permanent appointment . That the Respondent has taken most of the Hamalies and as well as the casual labours into regular service in the year 1997 except few casual labours . R1 and R2 appointed 2 persons in fresh without considering the applications of the applicant and whereas the said fresh recruitees did not work as a casual labour in the unit of the R1 at any time. But at the instance of the then executive body of the R3 . R1 misguided R2 and got approved the fresh candidates list for recruitment and regularized their services . R3 intentionally removed the name of the applicant and as well as other persons who worked continuously as casual labours in the unit of R1 at Warangal for more than five years .

Reddy, Ch . Lingamurthy, J. Damodhar & J. Yeshwanth Raj , Advocates .

For the Respondent : M/ s. B.G. Ravindra Reddy, P. Srinivasulu & B. V. Chandra- sekhar, Advocates .

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A(2 ) of the I. D. Act , 1947 by the Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Warangal in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others and transferred tothis Court in view of the Government of India , Ministry of Labour's Order No. H - 11026 / 1 / 2001 - IR ( C - II ) dated 18-10-2001 bearing I.D. No. 20/1999 and renumbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 239/2001 .

4. No notice was issued, no enquiry was conducted, no reason was given for deleting the name of the Petitioner No. 1 from the list at the time of permanent appointment of the casual labourers . Hence , the termination of the applicant by the Respondents on 31-3-97, is clearly illegal and cannot be sustained in law being violation of Industrial Disputes Act . That the non - appointment of the applicant who has got the sufficient service is highly arbitrary and fanciful without any reasonable cause and has been effected the applicant for an indigent person on the road , which is illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice . That the Petitioner No. 1 along with other workers got issued legal notice to the opposite parties but there is no response from their side . That the Petitioner No. 1 died and his LRs are applicant Nos . 2 to 6 are added as per the order in I. A. 69 of 2002 dated 29-10-2002 and hence , the applicant Nos . 2 to 6 are entitled for back wages since 1-4-1997 . Hence , it is prayed to set aside the oral termination dated 31-3-97 of the opposite parties and direct them to reinstate the applicant No. 2 into service with full back wages , continuity of service and other attendant benefits . !

2. The brief facts as stated in the petition by the Petitioners are : That the Petitioner No. I was appointed along with other casual labourers by R1 and RI used to pay the wages through R3 namely FCI Hamalies Labour Contract Co- operative Society Ltd. , Kazipet , Warangal -3 . The Petitioner No. I was appointed in January, 1993 as casual labour and he was drawing wages Rs . 16 per day but receiving the wages through R3 . The Petitioner No. 1 worked continuously till the end of 31st March , 1997 and lastly the Petitioner No. I used to receive a wage of Rs . 46 per day. The FCI Management through R3 used to

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

under contract system as per rates , terms and condition of the agreement entered into . As per records wage registers were audited by the District Co- operative Auditor, produced by the FCI Hamali Labour Contract Co-operative Society Ltd. , Kazipet , the individual Petitioner No. 1 was not on the rolls of the society during the years 1994 to 1997 with R3 except for 20 days and 6 days during May, 1995 and February, 1996 respectively. That if any amount is pending in GPF he should claim from the Provident Fund authorities .

and he was being paid Rs . 16 per day. His appointment was continued till 31-3-97 and he was being paid Rs . 46 per day. That as per the direction of the Food Corporation of India, Headquarters , New Delhi , R1 issued a circular stating that all the casual labourers and Hamalies who had worked under control of Respondent become permanent employees and their services will be regularised . Accordingly, he made an application with other casual labourers working under Direct Payment System individually to regularize his services in the year 1997. The Respondent No. 3 intentionally got removed the Petitioner No. 1 by influencing the R1 and R2 on 31-3-1997 . But 25 fresh candidates have been appointed as permanent labourers in the Food Corporation of India godown. Kazipet by ignoring his application. Identity card is Ex. W1 . That he and others got issued a legal notice . Ex. W2 is the office copy. But no reply was received. Ex. W3 is the Xerox copy of the death certificate of Petitioner No. 1. She prays that she may be reinstated in the place of her deceased husband.

9. In the cross examination she deposed that she do not know the Petitioner No. 1's duties . It is not true to suggest that he worked under R3 but not R1 . That he had no connection with R3 society at any point of time. She denied that the suggestion that he never worked with R1 and R2. It is not true to suggest that there is no employer and employee relationship between her husband and R1 and R2 and he was never appointed or terminated by R1 and R2 .

6. As per Food Corporation of India Headquarters ' letter No. IR(L) /32 (21 )/97 dated 5-11-97 the workers already working there for the past three years and who had worked for atleast 9 out of 12 months in the last year and whose EPF deductions were being made will be extended the benefit of Direct Payment System. The Bio- data of each labour presently working in the depots as maintained by the concerned labour Co - operative Society and Food Corporation of India may be obtained in prescribed proforma of Bio -data. That the copy of the aforesaid letter has been supplied to Food Corporation of India Workers Union , Kazipet for list of eligible workers for induction. The Society submitted a list of workers in which the name of the Petitioner No. 1 does not find place. It is incorrect to state that the applicant has made any application along with other casual labourers in the year 1997 itself for seeking regularization of his services and for permanent appointment . That only eligible labour has beeninducted. It is incorrect that R3 intentionally removed the name of the Petitioner No. I as well as the other persons who worked continuously as casual labour in the unit of RI for more than 5 years . All the allegations are false and baseless . There is no appointment and there is no question of termination . That opposite party Nos . 1 and 2 are functioning as per law and in accordance with the directions of the higher authority from time to time without adopting unfair labour practice . That when the reply notices were being prepared the Petitioner No. 1 rushed to the Hon'ble Court . Hence , he is not entitled for any relief as prayed for.

7. R3 filed a counter stating that the PetitionerNo. I is not the member ofthe society of R3 . That the Petitioner No. 1 has not submitted his EPF number which goes to show that no deductions were made and the Petitioner No. 1 was not a member of the society. That as per the Headquarters letter dated 5-11-97 Direct Payment System has been introduced in Food Corporation of India owned depots . As he is not a member of the society his name was not forwarded. Hence , he prayed that the petition may bedismissed.

12. Sri S. Subramanyam, Assistant Manager in the office ofthe District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Warangal as MWI . He deposed in the chief examination that the handling and transport work was entrusted to R3 society on tender basis. A copy ofthe agreement is marked as Ex. M1 . R3 used to engage his own personnel for doing the said work and pay them. The corporation has nothing to do with the contract labour. The third Respondent was the contractor during the relevant point of time. While so, the Food Corporation of India Workers ' Union had raised an Industrial Dispute which ultimately resulted in a settlement between the corporation and the union . In terms of the said settlement the corporation has issued circular dated 5-11-97 which is Ex . M2 , providing for introduction of Direct Payment System. As per the formula given in the said circular, the eligible contract labourers in the order of their seniority were inducted into Direct Payment System . There were 498 contract labourers , the list is Ex. M3 during the relevant time and out of them 419 were inducted which was marked as Ex . M4 into the Direct Payment System as per circular dated 5-11-97 . That the Petitioner No. 1 worked from February, 1995 to February, 1996 with R3 for 26 days only. That the contract labourers were paid their wages by the contractor and he only remitted the provident fund contributions for his employees . As the Petitioner No. 1 was only a contract 8. The Petitioner No. 2, N. Kamala wife of Late Ramesh, Petitioner No. 1 examined herself as WWI and deposed about the Petitioner No. 1. That initially he was appointed as casual labour in the month of January 1993 10024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] labourer he is not entitled to maintain the present Industrial Dispute. Hence , the Industrial Dispute may be dismissed.

13. In the cross examination , he deposed that he took charge only three months back. 119 casual labourers were taken out of 409 workers . They all have come under Direct Payment System. The R3 has not given any aquittance register to their corporation . The mode of work of the casual workers is godown cleaning and other technical operations in the godown . The depot incharge used to supervise the workers after introducing the Direct Payment System . Prior to the introduction of Direct Payment System their employees used to supervise workers, they are called as technical assistants and dusting operators . It is true that all the casual labourers used to work under the supervision of the dusting operators and technical assistants in the godowns even prior to the introduction of Direct Payment System. But the casual workers were supplied and engaged by the society. It is true that in Ex. M3 the date of appointment of the Hamalies , supervisors and their designations were given in the list and whereas the particulars including designations and appointment of the casual labourers were not mentioned in the list submitted by the R3 society. He is not aware whether R3 raised any dispute after selection ofthe candidates under Direct Payment System. That they have not submitted any document alongwith counter. That they have not taken the bio - data of the individual candidates before the selection of the workers under Direct Payment System . He denied that the Petitioner No. 1 is cligible for absorption. It is true that there is a signature of the then Assistant Manager of their corporation on the Ex . W1 issued by the Food Corporation of India Hamalies Labour Cooperative Society Limited. He denied thathe is deposing falsely.

14. It is argued by the learned Counsel for the Petitioners that as per the circular Ex . M2 the office of the opposite party has introduced Direct Payment System by taking workers into regular service . This Petitioner No. 1 and others were not taken into service and were removed from service illegally . In another way the recommendation of the opposite party No. 3 about 25 members who did not work for a single day in the godown, were taken into service by introducing the Direct Payment System to them. The R3 misguided the opposite party Nos . 1 and 2 and got approved the said candidates list and regularized their services . R3 is mainly responsible for illegal termination of the applicant and others , though there is no valid reason . The Petitioner No. 1 has worked for more than 5 years as casual labour in the godown at Kazipet . The opposite party never issue many notice to the Petitioner No. 1 and not enquiry was held prior to his termination to the notice dated 13-11-99 there is no reply from their side . That opposite parties admitted that as identity card was issued and EPF was deducted . That

opposite party Nos . 1 and 2 selected the casual labourers ofthe list furnished by R3 . That on the application of the Petitioner No. 1 the following documents were called for : (a) Work slips of the casual labourers of the Kazipet Godown from 1-1-97 to 30-9-2000; (b) attendance register of the casual labourers; (c) list of the I.D. issued by the opposite party Nos . 2 and 3 ; and (d) monthly and daily wages register from 1-1-95 to 30-9-2000. But, even after the directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal they did not produce the documents, so it can be presumed that the opposite parties intentionally suppressed such documentary evidence to avoid to introduce the Direct Payment System to the applicants . The suppression of material documents by the R1 to R3. is amounts to suppression of material facts and adverse inference can be drawn against the opposite parties . That the Petitioner No. I worked from January , 1993. No enquiry was held and he was dismissed . MWI only had put in three months of service . He adnitted that the casual workers are under the supervision of their employees i.e. , technical assistants and dusting operators. He also admitted that particulars of designation of the appointment of the casual labourers are not mentioned in the list submitted by R3 at the time of selection . He also admitted that the opposite party did not submit any documentary evidence alongwith counter and no bio -data was taken from individual persons at the time of the selection . That he does not know whether the Petitioner No. 1 had submitted the bio - data at the time of selection under Direct Payment system . He admitted that there is no signature of the opposite party No. 2 on Ex. WI . He submits that R1 and R2 are saying that the applicant No. 1 had worked only for a few days and at other time they are saying that the Petitioner No. 1 is not the worker of theopposite party and in another stage they are saying that he worked for some days. That the Respondents failed to produce attendace register, payment register , identity card register pertaining to the casual workers . R1 and R2 also failed to submit the said documents inspite ofdirection by the Hon'ble Court . R3 society clearly stated in his counter that the Direct Payment System was introduced and implemented to the workers who worked for more than 3 years particularly 9 months out of 12 months prior to April , 1996. Hence, the Petitioner No. 1 is eligible having worked so . That their EPF was also deducted. Ex. M1 is the contract agreenient between R2 and R3 for the year 1994 only. They did not submit the latest agreement for the year 1996-97 . Hence whether there is any agreement held between them in the year 1996-97 is doubtful . When there is no agreement for the year 1996- 97 how can the society submit the list for the selection of the candidates under Direct Payment System and how can R1 and R2 consider the list submitted by R3 . Hence , Ex . M1 is in no way concerned with the dispute raised by the applicants against the R1 to R3 . The last agreement was held in the year 1995-96 i.e. , upto 12-11-1996 only. But they have not filed any such agreement . So it may be safely [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

concluded that the workers who worked under R1 and R2 till April , 1996 are eligible under Direct Payment System introduced by Respondents . That there is violation of Sec. 25F. Hence , the termination dated 31-3-1997 is illegal and void.

15.He relied on 2001 LLJ page 201 wherein it was held that the Petitioner No. 1 did complete more than 240 days of service , that Section 25F was not complied with, the termination was therefore bad . He also relied on 1996 (3) ALD page 955 wherein it was held that Petitioner No. 1 was appointed on tenure basis giving artificial breaks . Petitioner No. 1's services were terminated refusing renewal and another person appointed . It was held that the Petitioner No. 1 is entitled to protection under Section 25F and 25H . He also relied on (2001) 1 Supreme Court Cases page 61 , where it was held that the absentee workman was required to join duty by a specific date but when attempted to join duty was prevented doing so. Held the said standing order would not be used to effect automatic termination of service . Therefore prays that the Petitioner No. 1 to be reinstated.

16. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondents that the Petitioner No. 1 was never engaged in the Food Corporation of India at any point of time. The handling and transport work was entrusted to the contractor, namely Food Corporation of India, Hamali Labour Contract Co-operative Society Ltd. , Kazipet i.e. , the R3 . Ex . Ml is the copy of the said agreement . The contract used to engage his own personnel . That R3 is the employer of the Petitioner No. 1 and not R1 and R2 . The identity card was also issued by R3 . That the Food Corporation of India Workers ' Union has raised an Industrial Dispute regarding the contact labourers and the saiddispute had resulted in a settlement . Accordingly, a circular was issued dated 5-11-1997 absorbing the contract labourers under Direct Payment System, subject to the terms and conditions of the settlement . Out of 498 contract labourers during the relevant period 419 were inducted under Direct Payment System. The Petitioner No. 1 who did not fit into the system was not taken under Direct Payment System . That the Petitioner No. 1 was never appointed and therefore question of his termination by Food Corporation of India does not arise . He relied on 2001 2 ALD page 205 wherein it was held that daily wage employees cannot claim regular employment , their disengagement from service cannot be construed as violation of Section 25F. He also relied on 1989 2 ALD page 420 Division Bench wherein it was held that contract labour working as Hamali Employee contractors of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , they are not entitled to be absorbed as badli fillers of the company without their names being sponsored by employment exchange . So further held such workmen employed through a contractor does not become employees of the company. He also relied on 2000 ( 1 ) LLJ page 561 wherein the Lordships held Law 3606 GL/04-55

10025

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

does not prescribe any time limit for the appropriate Government to exercise its powers under Section 10 of the Act. It is not that this power can be exercised at any point of time and to revive matters which had since been settled. Power is to be exercised reasonably and not in a rational manner. There appears to us to be no rational basis on which the central government has exercised powers in this case after lapse of about 7 years of order dismissing the Petitioner No. 1 from service . He also relied on 1993 FLR (67) page 70 wherein it was held: lapse of over 15 years in approaching the Court-Deprives them remedy available to them in law-Loses their rights as well . He therefore , prays that the petition may be dismissed.

17. It may be seen that the case of the Petitioner No. 1 is thathe is working from January 1993 and worked till March, 1997. He and there are 28 other persons like him who have approached this Tribunal . Respondent submitted that this Court has nojurisdiction under Section 2A(2) of the A.P. State Amendment Act. of the I.D. Act, 1947. I would like to clarify one position that this is Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court and amendment of Section 2A(2) of the State Government applies to this Court also . Further, as stated in the beginning itself, the Hon'ble High Court by a Division Bench Judgement has held that the amendment is assented by the President of India and therefore , it is appicable to the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Hyderabad . Hence , I hold that this Court has got jurisdiction.

18. While this petition is pending for adjudication before this Court, the Petitioner No. 1 died on 6-6-2000 and his LRs are brought on records as Petitoner. No. 2 to 6 as per order in IA 69/2002 dated 23-9-2002 .

19. Without going into much elaborate discussions it is an admitted fact that as casual labourer the Petitioner No. 1 has worked from January, 1993 to March, 1997. In view ofthe identity card Ex . W1 issued by R3 it becomes clear that he was working as contract labour under R3 atleast from September , 1993. No doubt, it is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petioner No. 1 that Ex . Ml is a copy of the agreement for the year 1994-95 only for the contract work of the godown between R2 and R3 . He submits that there is no agreement filed for 1995 or 1996. Hence, he submits that it can be safely taken as that the Petitioner No. 1 is worker under R1 and R2 . It may be seen that previously the law was that if somebody was engaged byacontfactor for prohibited items of contract they would be treated as ipso facto employees of the principal employer. As per Judgement in 2001 ( 1 ) 7 Supreme Court Cases page 1 between Steel Authority of India Ltd. , and others Vs. National Union Waterfront Workers and others , wherein it was held that , " ..... Does not imply the concept ofautomatic absorption of contract labour by the principal 10026 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 / AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] employer on issuance of abolition notification" . Here

and Rs. 3000 to Smt . N. Buchamma, Mother of Late Ramesh. R3 shall pay Rs . 2000 to Smt. N. Kamala, W/o Late Ramesh, Rs . 2000 to N. Srujana, D/ o Late Ramesh, Rs . 2000 to N. Srikanth , S/o Late Ramesh , Rs . 2000 to N. Suresh , S/ o Late Ramesh and Rs . 2000 to Smt . N. Buchamma, Mother of Late Ramesh. The amount payable to minor children should be paid to their mother Smt . N. Kamala . The said amount shall be paid by R1 , R2 and R3 within 30 days after publication of this Award failing which the concerned will be entitled to receive the amount with 6% interest after 30 days ofpublication of this Award .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me, on this the 31st day of August, 2004 .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer .

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner No. 1

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

WW1 : Smt. N. Kamala MW1 : Sri S. Subramanyam

Documents marked for the Petitioner No. 1

Ex . W1 Identity Card.

Ex. W2 : Copy of legal notice dated 13-11-1999 to the Respondents.

Ex. W3 Copy of death certificate of Petitioner No. 1 .

Documents marked for Respondent

Ex. M1 : Copy of tender application , agreement papaers.

Ex. M2 : Copy of Ir . No. IR( L) /319 (21 ) / 97 dated 5-11-1997.

Ex . M3 : Copy of statement by 498 workers .

Ex . M4 Copy of list of 419 workers who were taken underDirect Payment System.

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

का. आ. 3232.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एफ.सी.आई. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी.आई.डी. 197/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । admittedly Ex. W1 is an identity card issued by R3 . No doubt , it might have been signed by R3 and the Assistant Manager of R1 or R2. In fact , R1 and R2 have given the details of the Petitioner No. 1 who has worked only for 133 days . No doubt , even R3 outrightly denied that the Petitioner No. 1 worked with them , they did not produce any attendance register or any documents . Ex . W1 is issued on 10-9-1993 by R3 and signed by Assistant Manager, Food Corporation of India. So it cannot be simply brushed aside as if there is no iota of truth in what the Petitoner No. 1 is saying but he is unable to substantiate as to how many days he has worked . One thing is very clear that as Ex . W1 was issued , it may be safely presumed that atleat he was working and the Government has come up with a scheme and it is not known as to why the name of the Petitioner No. 1 was not sent . However, now there is Direct Payment System, I wonder whether still R3 is given contract or not . Be that may be so . In the given circumstances of the case, the Petitioner No. 1 was unable to give his EPF number also and could not prove satisfactorily as to how many days he worked. But, one thing is sure that he did work under R3 for R1 and R2 . It is not the case of R1 to R3 that Ex . W1 is a fake one. Hence , it has to be taken as correct. No documents are filed before me to disprove the same . Why such a chance was not given to these persons , when it was given to 419 persons and why they were suddenly given a go -by on 31-3-1997. But as stated earlier inview of the Steel Authority of India case as cited above , they cannot be held as employees of R1 and R2 being contract labour under R3 . No doubt, during the pendency of the petition the Petitioner a young man of about 28 years died and Ex. W3 is his death certificate. Ex . W1 is the ID card issued by R3 , so the case of the Respondent does not stand to reason that he worked only in 1995 , so , not only that the wife of the deceased who brought as LR - I has deposed that her husband's GPF Number is 421. In fact419 persons been regularised and these Petitioner No. 1 and 28 others like this Petitioner No. 1 were given a go -by. In fact R3 has gone to the extent that he was not a member at all during 1993 to 1997. This is outrightly false in view of Ex . W1 and that the Petitioner is died. The only way that his LRs who, the first one being young wife of the deceased aged about 26 yearsars and three minor children aged about, 11 years , 9 years and 5 years respectively and old mother aged about 57 years , in the fitness of things I think , I am of the opinion that compensation should be paid to these LRs . As they are minors the daughter or sons can not be asked to do job and the wife of the deceased having three children, old aged mother - in -law, she can not be asked to work, so she can be compensated . Accordingly, an award is passed directing that R1 and R2 shall pay Rs . 3,000/-to Smt . N. Kamala , W/ o Late Ramesh, Rs . 3000 to N. Srujana , D/ o Late Ramesh , Rs . 3000 to N. Srikanth , S / o Late Ramesh , Rs . 3000 to N. Suresh , S/o Late Ramesh

[सं . एल. 22013/1/2004-आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी 10027 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ],

New Delhi, the 29th November, 2004

For the Respondent : M/ s . B : G . Ravindra Reddy , P. Srinivasulu & B. V. Chandrasekhar, Advocates .

AWARD

S.O. 3232.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.L.C.I.D. No. 197/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of FCI and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

[No. L -22013/ 1 /2004- IR(C- II) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

This case, 1.D. No. 16/1999 is transferred from Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Warangal in view ofthe Government of India, Ministry of Labour's Order No. H- 11026/1 / 2001 - IR( C - II ) dated 18-10-2001 and renumbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 197/2001 . This is a case takenunder Section 2A( 2 ) of the I.D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail, Presiding Officer

Dated the 31st day of August, 2004

2. In spite of several adjournments given from 9-1-2003 for enquiry ofthe Petitioner, for 28 adjournments including 31-8-2004 the petitioner has not turned out. In spite ofnumber ofadjournments the petitioners has failed to produce any evidence in support of his claim . There is nothing on record to substantiate the case of the Petitioner. Hence, a 'Nil ' Award is passed, Transmit .

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.L.D. No. 197/2001

(Old L. D.No. 16/1999 transferred from Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Warangal)

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personnel Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 31st day of August, 2004.

BETWEEN :

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer Sri C. Mojes ,

S/o Joel ,

Appendix of evidence C/ o . Sri D. Janardhan , Advocate ,

H. No. 1-7-1246 ,

Advocate Colony,

Witnesses examined for thePetitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

.... Petitioner

Hanamkonda .

NIL

AND

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Documents marked for Respondent 1. The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Millers Association Building , Hunter Road, Warangal .

2. The Senior Regional Manager,

NIL NIL NIL

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004 Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, III Floor, HACA Bhavan , Hyderabad

3. The President,

...Respondents .

Food Corporation of India , Hasmalies Labour Contract Co -op. Society, C/oF.C.I. Godowns , Kazipet .

APPEARANCES :

का. आ. 3233.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी. आई.डी. 191/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । For the Petitioner :M/s . D. Janardhan, M.V. Raja

Reddy, Ch . Lingamurthy,

J. Damodhar & J. Yeshwanth Raj ,

[सं. एल. 22013/1/2004-आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी Advocates .

10028 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004

S.O. 3233. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.L.C.I.D. 191/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L- 22013 /1 /2004 - IR( C -II) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

22-9-1997 at Ramagundam Incline - II . While the Petitioner was discharging his duties as badli filler, he was issued with a chargesheet dated 11-2-2002 that he was absent without sufficient cause during the year 2000, alleging that he was unauthorisedly absent during the year 2000. He gave a reply that due to fire accident at Petitioner's native place where his parents are residing and also due to ill -health Petitioner could not reported for duty. He went to his native place at Mallapuram, Karimnagar District and at that time his parents' house burnt due to fire accident, his parents injured in the said fire accident. He was forced to stay at his native place due to his ill - health also . An enquiry was conducted and he was dismissed from service on 31-7-2002 . He worked from 22-7-1997 to 31-7-2002 . Hence , he may be reinstated.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri E. Ismail, B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 27th day of August, 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.L.D. NO . 191/2003

BETWEEN :

Sri Laxmi Rajam,

3.Acounter was filed stating that the enquiry was properly conducted . He is habitual absentee. But still a chance was given to him by a letter dated 31-7-2001 by keeping the disciplinary action to be taken against him in abeyance temporarily and to observe his attendance and work performance for a period of six months from 1-8-2001 to 31-1-2002 . The Petitioner was also informed that he has to put in at least 20 musters in every months andwith a filling performance of 2 tubs for every muster onan average per month . His attendance and performance during the observation period is as follows:

S/o . Nagamallu,

C/o. G. Vidyasagar, Advocate,

719, Sri Venkateshwara Temple Lane ,

S. Month No.

Total No. of musters

Chikkadpall.y,

No. of Filling musters

No. of Tubs filled per month

Petitioner

Hyderabad- 500020,

29.5

1. August, 2001

AND

23.0

2. September, 2001

The Chief General Manager,

26.5

3. October , 2001

M/ s. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. ,

(A Government comp),

4. November, 2001

11.0 Ramagumdam Area - 1 ,

5. December, 2001

16.0 Karimnagar District .

Respondents

16.5 APPEARANCES :

6. January, 2002

For the Petitioner

Total

122.5 : M/s . G. Vidya Sagar, K. K. Udaya Sri , P. Sudheer Rao & D.

Madhusudhan, Advocates .

During the year , 2002, he has put - in only 33 musters upto June.Hence , he déserves no sympathy and the petition may be dismissed.

For the Respondent : M/ s . K. Srinivasa Murthy, C. Vijay Sekhar Reddy & S. Vijay

Venkatesh , Advocates .

AWARD

4. Arguments were advanced on the validity of domestic enquiry. This Court by an order dated 12-4-2004 heldthat the domestic enquiry is validly conducted . Hence , arguments were advanced under Section 11 A by both the counsels.

This is a case taken under Section 2A (2) of the I.D. Act , 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s. Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

5. It is arguedby the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that sympathy may be shown as the absenteeism was due to various reasons and not want only. Therefore , he may reinstated into service with back wages and all attendant benefits .

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petition are : That the Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on 10029

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 6. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent argues that from 1997 , since the date he joined his musters were not upto the mark, in 1998 also he put in only 123 days , in 1999 he put in 128 days, in 2000 he put in only 50 days for which the chargesheet was issued. But inspite ofgiving him a chance by letter dated 31-7-2001 during August, 2001 to January, 2002 he has put in only 65 musters in the five months and during the year 2002 he has put in only 33 musters till June, 2002. Hence, he may be given any chance. Hence, the petition may be dismissed .

S.O. 3234. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12/ 2001 ) of the Central Government Labour Court, Ernakulam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofAIR & Doordarshan and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L- 42012/32/ 2000- IR(C- II) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM

(IN THE LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM):

Wednesday, the 27th day of October, 2004 PRESENT:

Sri K. K. Utharan , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 12/2001 (Central)

BETWEEN:

7. I have given serious thoughts and in several cases I have given chance when circumstances so warrated. But in this case I am afraid that stretching the quality of mercy by giving any relief to the Petitioner will not be justified because, right from the date of entering into service he has not put in minimum musters . Leave alone that by letter dated 31-7-2001 he was given a chance for six months to improve himself and what does he do during the said observation period from August , 2001 to January, 2002 he put in only 65 musters . Not only that, from February, 2002 to the end of June , i.e. , five months he has put in only 24 musters . Can this Court stretch leniency to such an extent where the work of the mine will be much affected. Hence, I am afraid that this is one of the rare cases where no sympathy can be shown . Hence , anAward is passed holding that the Petitioner is not entitled for any relief.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

The Management of Executive Engineer ( Civil ) Akashvani & Doordarshan, Civil Construction Wing, Kakkanad, Cochin-682030.

AND

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 27th day of September, 2004.

Smt. Sara George , Thappalodathu House , Poyyachira, Kakkanad , Cochin -682 030 .

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer .

REPRESENTATIONS:

Appendix of evidence

For the Management : Sri V. J. Joseph , Advocate , A.C.G.S.C. , Ernakulam .

Witnesses examined for Witnesses examined for the the Petitioner

Respondent

NIL

For the Workman : Sri Asok M. Cherian , Advocate, Ernakulam.

Documents marked for the Petitioner

AWARD

NIL

Documents marked for Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

This reference was made by the Central Government ofIndia as per letter No : L-42012/32/2000 - IR (C - II ) dated 25-6-2001 . The dispute is between the management of Akashvani & Doordarshan and their workman Smt . Sara George. Thedispute referred is:

"Whether the action of Executive Engineer (Civil) , CivilConstruction Wing , AIR & TV, Cochin in terminating the services of Smt. Sara George, Part- time Sweeper w.e.f. 1-6-2000 is legal & justified ? If not, to what relief she is entitled to ?" का. आ. 3234.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, आकाशवाणी और दूरदर्शन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार लेबर कोर्ट, अर्नाकुलम ( संदर्भ संख्या 12/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. The workman filed claim statement raising the following allegations : The workman herein was working continuously, as part -time Sweeper in the office [सं. एल-42012/32/2000- आई. आर. (सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी 10030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

workmen. It is respectfully submitted that the retrenchment of workman's service is illegal and bad for it is vindictive and malafide . It is also unjust and illegal in as much as it is resorted to by management solely to perpetuate " Unfair Labour Practice" which is prohibited by the provision of S. 25 T of I.D. Act, 1947.

Again while retrenching the service of this workman the management corporation has retained workman much junior to this workman without any shyme or reason, thus while retrenching the service of this workman S. 25G of Industrial Disputes Act has been violated by the management rendering the workman's service illegal and unjust.

ofthe Assistant Engineer (Civil ) , Civil Construction Wing, AIR & T.V. Kakkanad for last more than 18 years . Ever since joining duty, the workman was continuously employed in the office of the management. The workman was so employed by the management against the permanent and regular vacancy of sweeper to do permanent and regular works of a sweeper. All the works ofa permanent and regular sweeper were got done through the workman and the workman had been duly discharging works thereof entrusted to her diligently and with utmost devotion. Though the workman was employed against permanent vacancy and all the works of permanent sweeper were got done through her by the management , the workman was not extended the privileges and benefits commensurate with the permanent and regular sweeper employed in the office of management. As a matter of fact the workman was treated as part time sweeper against a permanent and regular vacancy to do permanent and regular nature of work as sweeper, with the sole intent of depriving her the status and privileges of permanent and regular workman .

It is further submitted that the management has taken new hands in service , subsequent to the retrenchment of this workman's service without considering this workman and without affording him an opportunity of re - employment . This action of the management is illegal and violative of S. 25H of Industrial DisputeAct, 1947, rendering the workman's service illegal and unjust, apart from exposing it to be malafide.

The workman had requested the management several times to regularise her service in the permanent and regular services , since she was continuously employed against a permanent and regular vacancy to do permanent and regular nature of work. However no steps were taken by the management in this regard. On the other hand , the management denied employment to the workman from 1-6-2000 onwards without considering workman's request for regularisation and in violation of the provisions of law governing the workman and management .

It is also submitted that the action of the management in retrenching the workman's service militates against and violates the regularisation scheme prevalent in management corporation which governs this workman as well . Denial of regularisation thereunder to this workman is discriminatory and unjust . In consonance with the aforesaid scheme prevalent in management corporation pursuant to which a number of similarly situated workman have been earlier regularised and retained in service , this workman is entitled to be regularised and retained in the permanent service of management . Retrenchment of the workman's service without affording him the benefits of regularisation accruing under the aforesaid scheme is illegal and unjust. This action also reflects malafide on the part of the management .

It is submitted that denial of employment to the workman from 1-6-2000 is " retrenchment " as defined in Section 2(00 ) of the I.D. Act. The workman was however retrenched without complying any of the conditions enumerated in Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act even though , the workman had put in more than one year continuous service in Management Corporation. No notice of retrenched is given nor is the workman afforded pay in lieu of such notice. No retrenchment compensation is either paid to the workman . Thus for the non compliance ofthe conditons stipulated in Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, the retrenchment of the workman is illegal and ab initio void.

It is respectfully submitted that the action of the management in terminating the service of workman from 1st June 2000 is illegal and unjust, besides being full and ab initio void . The workman is out of employment from 1st June 2000 without any job . The workman hails from a poor family with no other means of livelihood except for the job in management corporation . Unless the workman is re - instated in the service of management, his family will be driven to great financial difficulties and starvation . The workman is entitled for reinstatement in the service of management with full back wages and other attendant benefits .

It is also submitted that the retrenchment of workman's services is vindictive and malafide resorted solely to some how defeat the workman's demand/claim for regularisation and clearly in retaliation of demand thereof put forth by the workman. In this regard it is submitted that the management corporation is in the habit ofemploying workman on part time basis batch by batch against permanent and regular vacancies for the discharge of permanent and regular nature of work , with the motive of denying the status and privileges of permanent

3. The management filed written statement raising the following contentions : The above I. D. is not maintainable either in law or on facts of the case . The prayers of the workman in the I. D. is not allowable .

10031 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

It is denied the allegation that the management in the I. D. is in the habit of employing workman on part time basis batch by batch against permanent and regular vacancies the discharge of permanent and regular nature ofwork, with motive of changing the status and privileges ofpermanent workers . The sanctioned post of safaiwala for Kochi divisional office is only one post , The allegation is mala fide .

The allegations in paragraph 6 of the above I. D. are totally false and hence denied.

It is humbly sumbitted that there has been no instance of taking new hands in service as alleged in paragraph 7 of the above 1. D. and hence the same is denied.

As the work involved was for not more than an hour aday, no regular post could be created for the work. There hasbeen no instances of regularisation of similarly situated workman as there existed no such workman.

As the work involved was only one hour job and this remained a part of the duty of the only regular incumbent , the same had to be got done by utilising the services of the regular incumbent.

Hence the I.D. may be dismissed with costs of the management.

It is humbly submitted that the claims of the workman in this I. D. that the workman was continuously employed against permanent and regular vacancy of sweeper to do permanent and regular work of sweeper is false and hence denied . The work got done from the workman involved part time work of less than an hour job , which involved cleaning and sweeping two sub- division offices , one of which has been shifted to calicut prior to September 1999. With the shifting of the Divisional Office, i.e. office of the Executing Engineer (Civil ) to Kochi from Trivandrum the Divisional Office occupied the building in which the above sub divisions , a cement godown and an electrical godown were situated. The divisional office having occupied the building with its full staff strength started functioning in Kochi from September 1999. In the divisional office's staff strength, there is only one post of safaiwala -cum - farash for sweeping and cleaning purposes . None of the sub-divisions under the divisional office is having regular sanctioned post of safaiwala -cum -farash as the cleaning and sweeping work of a sub-division according to its area does not involve more than half an hour's job. For the part time work of sweeping the workman was of part paid Rs . 360 a month. The claim that the workman was employed against permanent vacancy is wrong and with false motives . There has been no permanent or regular vacancy in its staff strength except the one stated above against which there already existed an incumbent . The applicant/workman worked in sub divisional office. The staff pattern of the sub divisional office is one post of Assistant Engineer , three posts of Junior Engineers , one post of Clerk and one post of Peon . There is no post of safaiwala-cum- farash. Subsequently, the divisional office shifted to Kochi in the same building where the sub- divisional office was functioning. There is one safaiwala -cum -farash post in the divisional office . So one permanent safaiwala - cum- farash came fromTrivandrum.

4. The workman filed a replication raising the following contentions :-The allegations of the management in the paragraph 2 and 3 of the written statement are untenable. The workman was employed under the employer continuously since the year 1983. Even after shifting one of the Sub Divisions to Calicut , the workman was allowed to work under the employer . The Sub Division was shifted in July, 1999. The workman was allowed to work upto 31-4-2000. This shows that denial of employment to the workman was not due to shifting of the Sub Division .

The contentions in the paragraph 4 of the written statement are incorrect . The workman had requested the management several times to regularise her services . Ever since joining duty, the workman was continuously employed in the office of the management and she was so employed by the management against the permanent and regular vacancy of sweeper.

It is denied the claim that the workman had requested the management several times to regularise her services in the permanent and regular services . It is humbly submitted that the workman was not employed against permanent or regular vacancy. A day's work for the part time workman involved not more than an hours job for which the workman was of last being paid Rs . 360 a month. With the shifting of the divisional office from Trivandrum, the regular and permanent incumbent had to be entrusted with the job of sweeping and cleaning , which remained a part of the duty of the regular incumbent .

The averment in paragraph 5 of the written statement are incorrect and baseless . The workman herein was working continuously, as part time sweeper in the office of the management for last more than 18 years .

The averments in paragraph 6 to 10 of the written statement are not correct . It is submitted that the services of the workman was retrenched without complying any of the conditions enumerated in Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act even though, the workman had It is hereby denied the claim of the workman that the workman had put in more than one year continuous service . The workman's job did not involved even a full days' work as there was no work for the workman to perform beyondthe one hour job a day.

10032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] put in more than one year continuous service in the management . No notice of the retrenchment is given nor is the workman afforded pay in lieu of such notice . No retrenchment compensation is paid to the workman, as well . Thus for the non- compliance of the conditions stipulated in Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act , the retrenchment of the workman is illegal and ab initio void.

It is also submitted that the workman was employed by the management against the permanent and regular vacancy of sweeper to do permanent and regular nature of duties of a sweeper . The retrenchment of workman's services is vindictive and mala fide resorted solely to somehow defeat the workman's demand/claim for regularisation and clearly in retaliation of demand thereof put forth by the workman. Further, the retrenchment of workman's service is resorted to with the sole intent of depriving the workman the status and privileges of permanent sweeper .

7. Point Nos. 1 & 2:-The case of the workman is that she was working continuously without any break as part time sweeper in the office of the Assistant Engineer (Civil) , Construction Wing, AIR & TV, Kakkanad for the last more than 18 years. It is also the case of the workman that she was employed by the management against the permanent and regular vacancy of sweeper to do permanent and regular works of a sweeper and all the works of a permanent and regular sweeper were got done through the workman and the workman had been duly discharging works thereafter entrusted to her deligently with utmost devotion. The contention of the management is that the workman was not continuously employed against permanent and regular vacancy of sweeper. The workman is examined as WW1 and marked and proved Ext . W1 to W5 . WW1 has deposed that from 1983 onwards she was continuously doing sweeper work in the management institution till she was terminated from service on 30th day of April, 2000. Ext. W1 dated 4-4-1997 is the copy of the letter send by. Assistant Engineer ( Civil) CCW AIR and TV, Kakkanad to the Executive Engineer , ( Civil ) CCW AIR & TV, Trivandrum. Ext . W1 reads as follows : " Smt. Sara George, a nearby Resident of this office (Cochin Sub-Division I & II and Electrical Section office) is sweeping and cleaning this office every day, for a lump - sum of Rs . 225 per month which has been sanctioned by the Executive Engineer (C) CCW, AIR, Trivandrum vide letter No. 7 (3 )/97 AC/ 1504 dated 14-5-1996 .

It is respectfully submitted that the action of the management in terminating the service of workman is illegal and unjust , besides being null and ab initio void. The workman is out of employment and ever since she is without any job . The workman hails from a poor family with no other means of livelihood except the job under the management . The workman's entire family is mainly depended on her job with the management . Unless the workman is reinstated in the services of management, her family will be driven to great financial difficulties and starvation . The workman is entitled for reinstatement in the service of management with full back wages and other attendant benefits .

Now Smt. Sara George is demanding for Rs . 450 per month, considering the Labour Problem in this locality and present wages , the request for enhancement of sweeping charge is justified Hence it is requested that the request for enhancement of sweeping charge may please be considered as Rs . 360 per month .

It is submitted that none of the objections or contentions raised by the management are tenable or sustainable . The workman reiterates the contentions in the statement of claim. Workman's claims are legal and just.

Hence it is humbly prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to pass an award upholding the workman's contention and claims and granting the workman reliefs as prayed for in the statement of claim.

5. The evidence in this case consists of the testimony ofWW1 and Ex. W1 to W5 on the side of the workman. Management has not adduced any evidence.

6. The points that arise for consideration are as

follows

1. Whether the termination of service of Smt . Sara George, part time sweeper w.e.f. 1-6-2000 is legal and justifiable ?

2. If not what relief she is entitled to ?

A sanction may please be issued for this with effect from 1-4-1997 and which will be paid from the Imprest Account of the Assistant Engineer ( Civil ) -II . Ext . W1 would show that the workman was doing sweeping and cleaning the office everyday, for a lump- sum of Rs . 2250 per month and the workman demanded enhanced rate of 450 per month and the undersigned in the Ext . W1 letter has recommended to enhance the lump -sum as Rs . 360 per month and requested sanction for the same. Ext . W2 is the sanction order dated 23-4-1997 issued by the Executive Engineer ( Civil) CCW, AIR & TV, Trivandrum. As per Ext . W2 the management sanctioned the lump- sum as Rs . 360 per month for doing the sweeping and cleaning work . The testimony of WW1 and Ext. WI & W2 would show that the workman was continuously working in the management establishment as a part time sweeper for a long period without any break . The management has not adduced any contra evidence . The management has also contended that the workman was not employed against a permanent vacancy. But the fact 10033 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

appointed before 7-5-1985 may be considered for regular appointment to Group -D post, even if they were recruited otherwise than through Employment Exchange. As per Ext. W5 the workman is entitled to be regularised in service.

8. In the circumstances and for the above discussions I find that the termination of service of Sant Sara George, part-time sweeper wef. 1-6-2000 isillogekanikramonot be justified. Therefore the quedar Seat. Sara Goonge is to be reinstated in service as Someper in the management institutions with 12gos .

In the result, anawallis passed directing the management tomc maikan Saut Soca George aspart timeSeuraadhommat Chatimeaftermination ofher servicewitanil with contimity of servicewithin oudom ofthe award.

Dictatedto the Confidential Assistatud , transcribed and typed out by her, corrected by me and passed this the 27th day of October, 2004.

Ernakulam

K. K. UTHARAN, Presiding Officer.

APPENDIX Witness examined on the side of the workman

WW1 Smt . Sara George .

Exhibits marked on the side of the workman

Ext. W1 : Copy of letter dated 4-4-1997 from the Asstt . Engineer ( Civil ) II , Civil Construction, Kakkanad to the Executive Engineer (Civil ) Construction Wing, Trivandrum.

Ext. W2 Sanction onder dated 23-4-1997 from the Executive Engineer ( Civil ) Trivandrum informing expenditure for sweeping and cleaning.

Ext . W3 : Copy of lawyer notice dated 19-6-2000 issued tothe Management under the instruction of theworkman.

Ext . W4 Reply notice dated 30-6-2000 from the Management to the lawyer.

Ext. W5: Copy of extract of a circular issued by the Department of Personnel & Training regarding recruitment to Group -D posts .

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

का. आ. 3235.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, सी. पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, that the workman was doing sweeping work in the management institution continuously without any break and she was paying Rs . 225 and thereafter Rs . 360 per month as wages till she was terminated from service on 30-4-2000 . It is also the case of the workman that she was terminated by the management on 30-4-2000 without any notice or paying any compensation . The contention ofthe management is that one of the two sub -divisional offices where the workman was doing sweeping work has been shifted to Calicut prior 1999. With a shifting of divisional office , the division office occupied by the building needs only a Safaiwala -cum- farash for sweeping and cleaning purpose. Considering the area of the building and that now none of the sub -division under the division office is having regular sanctioned post of safaiwaka-cam- farash as the cleaning work of a sub -division according to area does not involved more than 1/2 hours job. The counsel for the workman refuted the contention of the management . He would argue that after the termination of the service of the workman appointed another part time sweeper in the office . WW1 has deposed that in addition to the permanent employee the management has appointed another part time sweeper named Clara for sweeping purpose . The evidence in this case would show that the above contention of the management will not stand . After the termination of the service ofthe workman the workman sent notice to the management through Advocate requesting to reinstate her as sweeper in the management institution. Ext. W3 is the lawyer notice dated 19-6-2000 . Ext. W4 is the reply sent by the management to Ext. W3 lawyer notice. Ext. W5 is the extract of the department of personnel and training O.M. No. 49014/18/84-Est . ( C) dated 7-5-1985. Regarding the regularisation of service of casual workers not recruited through Employment Exchange before 7-5-1985 in Group- Dpost . In Ext. W5 it is stated which reads as follows : "Having regard to the fact the casual workers belong to the weaker section of the society and termination oftheir services will close undue hardship to them, it has been decided as a one time measure , in consultation with the Director General, Employment and Training that casual workers recruited before the issue of these instructions may be considered for regular appointment to Group-D posts, in terms of the general instructions even if they were recruited otherwise than through the employment exchange , provided they are eligible for regular appointment in all other respect. " Ext . W5 would show that the casual labourers had been appointed in the department otherwise than through Employment Exchange and that the casual labourers recruited before the issue of this instruction (dated 7-5-1985 ) may be considered for regular appointed of Group - D post, in terms of the general instructions , even if they were recruited otherwise than through Employment Exhange , Provided they are eligible for regular appointment in all other respects . This would show that the casual labourer

3606 G1 / 04-56 10034 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

Tribunal between the employers in relation to the Management of CPWD and their workman.

हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या 231/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

SCHEDULE

[सं. एल-42012/20/2001- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th Noven

"Whether the action of the Management ofCPWD, Hyderabad in terminating the services of Sri Y. Ramachandar , Typist-cum-Clerk by oral order w.e.f. 27-7-1996 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief Sri Ramachandar is entitled to ?"

This reference was registered as Industrial Distpute No. 231/2001 and notices were issued to the parties .

S.O. 3235. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 231 / 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of CPWD , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L-42012/ 20 /2001 - IR(CM - II) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , PresidingOfficer .

Dated , the 27th September, 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 231/2001

BETWEEN :

Sri Y. Ramachandar,

S/ o Y. Laxminarayana , 8-81 /T6 - EA , Temple Alwal , Secunderabad- 500 010.

.... Petitioner

AND

The Executive Engineer , Hyderabad Central Division - II , CPWD , Kendriya Sadan , 1st Floor, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad - 500 095 .

Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : Sri V. Narsimha Goud, Advocate .

For the Respondent Sri B. Rajavardhan Reddy,

Advocate.

AWARD

Tie Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L - 42012 / 20/ 2001 - IR ( CM - 11 ) dated 31-7-2001 referred the following dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the 1.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the claim statement are : That the Petitioner as initially appointed on 29-11-1984 as Assistant Operator (Electrical ) through the media of employment exchange in the office of Assistant Engineer in HCESD - I/III , CPWD , National Police Academy Campus , Shivarampally, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad, which works under the control of Director General of Works , C.P.W.D. , Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi . Accordingly, the Petitioner has been continuously worked till his services were terminated on 19-12-1984 along with fitness certificate . The Petitioner was not permitted to discharge his duty on the ground that he was on leave from 9-12-1984 to 18-12-1984. Ultimately the Petitioner was taken on duty to discharge the duties of typist-cum-clerk as LDC in the month of August, 1989. Accordingly, the Petitioner has worked at HYCSD - I/ 1 (Civil ) , CPWD, Hakeempet, Hyderabad upto October, 1992. Thereafter he was aked to work at CPWD , Kendriya Sadan, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad . Accordingly, he worked so . However, the Petititioner has worked whenever he was asked to work. Accordingly, the Petitioner was asked to work with the Respondent from 1-8-1994 . The petitioner continuously worked till his services were terminated on 27-7-1996 orally without following Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . That he was paid salary in the name of Y. Raghu, R. Seetharam, on. some times in order to deny the service benefits which amounts to unfair labour practice. That he has worked continuously without any break . That he made representation on 30-7-1996 and again another representation on 21-8-1996 but no reply. Again he sent reminder on 6-12-1997 again, he made a representation on 20-4-1998 . No reply. However, the Petitioner received letter dated October, 1998from the Director General of Works , CPWD , Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi informing the Petitioner that earlier original representations and reminders were not received and advised to send the same . Accordingly, he sent all and made one more representation dated 20-4-1999 . But no reply. Again he gave a representation on 4-10-1999, a reply dated 3-12-1999 was received by the Director General , CPWD , New Delhi , informing the Petitioner that it is not possible to appoint the Petitioner . The action of the Respondent is unfair. Hence , he is entitled for reinstatement with all consequential benefits .

10035 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Seetharam . The Respondent changed his name while making payment to avoid regularization . The persons who worked like him are namely, D. Nirmala, Hymavathi, Padmavalli , J. Babu, Lakshmi and Yadaiah were regualarized but he was discriminated.

5. In the cross examination he deposed that he was appointed on 5-12-94 under Ex . W1 . Due to sickness he could not attend from 9-12-84 . He has not given any written notice or moved the Hon'ble Court for reinstatement . He has not filed any document to show that he joined for duty in 1989, 1990 and 1991. As per Ex . W15 , he was engaged on daily wage basis on HR payment for doing typing work and arrears (Clerical ) work in Sub- Division 1/1 . He disagrees with the contents mentioned in Ex. W15 with regard to the working days . He has no document to establish as to how many days he worked . Ex. W17 and W18 , the attendance register pertaining to 1-11-1992 to 31-8-1995 and 1-9-95 to 29-7-96 respectively were prepared by himself and not by the office ofthe opposite party. Ex . W17 and W18 are not signed by any employee or officer of the opposite party. He denied that Ex . W17 and W18 does not tally with the working days in the vouchers marked as per Ex. W19 to W71 and not regularly. In the re-examination he deposed that Ex . W26 , 43,44, 46,53 , 55 , 58 , 60, 61, 62, 64, 65,67, 68, 69 , 70 and 71 have been signed by him only.

6. The Respondent examined Sri V B. B. V. Siva Prasad, Assistant Engineer in the office of the Respondent asMW1 and he deposed that the Petitioner was doing the job work wherever available in various units of CPWD organizations due to exigency of work and the Petitioner was paid as per the work done by him . He was not holding the status of an employee in the Respondent Department . Hence , there is no question of termination of his services by oral orders w.e.f. 27-7-96 . That in 1984 he worked only for 10 days and did not turn up over a period of five years . That he afterwards worked for 4 days in 1992, 133 days in 1993 , 97 days in 1994 , 21 days in 1995 and 8 days in 1996. He never worked for 240 days continuously.

3. A counter was filed by the Respondent. Stating that the Petitioner was doing casual job work wherever available at various units of CPWD Association due to exigencies of work and he was already paid for the work done. He was not holding the status of an employee in the Department and hence the question of terminating him by oral orders w.e.f. 27-7-1996 does not arise . As the Petitioner was engaged as Assistant Operator (Electrical) on NMR remained absent and turned back to Executive Engineer (Electrical ) for casual labour job presumably keeping eye on a white collar job. It is not feasible and obligatory on the part of the Department to await for his reporting back duties on NMR by suspending the work at site. Offer of appointment clearly states that, " (a) This appointment is purely temporary and liable for termination at any time without any notice or assigning any reasons ; (b) He will have no claims for the present post with Department against the service rendered here. " Therefore, the action of the Department in not engaging him because he remained absent which is after working only for 10 days , for five years without any intimation and his whereabouts were not known to the Department . Subsequently, he worked as Typist in the office of HYCSD - I/1 , CPWD , Hakeempet for 16days only at different spells during a large span of 4 years from 8/1989 to 10/1992 . He appears to have been moving around the offices of the CPWD in search of work and worked on casual /job work basis on very few occasions whenever and wherever there is work. After lapse of nearly five years he worked in Hyderabad Central Division No. 1 , and Hyderabad Central Division No. III , CPWD , Hyderabad. He worked for 2 days in 1989 , 2 days in 1990, 7 days in 1991 , 5 days in 1992 in Sub - Division No. 1/1 . In Sub- Division No. 1/3 , in 1993 he worked for 91 days. Similarly, in HCD.II , CPWD he worked for 4 days in 1992, in 1993-39 days , in 1994-4 days , in 1995-18 days and 1996-8 days . That he never worked continuously for 240 days. He has not put in one year's continuous service as on 1-8-93 as he has not fulfilled any of the conditions . Therefore , he is not entitled for any relief. It is learnt that the Petitioner is gainfully employed all these years as a job typist and all this false are made to gain sympathy of the Court. Hence , the petition may be dismissed .

7. In the cross - examination he deposed that it is true that the records pertaining to 1995-96 were filed and records pertaining to 1992-94 were not filed. His last working day was 10-7-96 . It is not true that he worked upto 27-7-96. But he worked only upto 10-7-96 . That as per Court's direction they filed 27 documents covering the period from 1-5-95 to 10-7-96 vide Ex. M1 to M27. He cannot say whether the total comes up to Rs . 18,300 and whether Petitioner has worked for 366 days from 1-5-95 to 10-7-96 . Ex. Ml to M4 payment vouchers represent the works the Petitioner worked on different days but not for one day but the payment was made on one day. It it not true to suggest that vouchers were issued in the name of Y. Raghu , Y. Srinath , V. Ramulu , Y. R. Raghu , R. Sita Ram and S. Ramulu to deprive the Petitioner.

4. The Petitioner examined himself as WW1 and marked Ex . W1 appointment letter dated 29-11-84 . He worked upto 8-12-84 as Assistant Operator and did not attend to duties from 9-12-84 due to illness. He intimated his sickness on 10-12-84 . That he reported to duty vide Ex. W3 . Ex . W4 is the medical certificate . Then he stated all those facts he stated in the petition. Ex . W19 to W71 are the payment vouchers for respective periods . Ex . W52 ispassed certifying the daily wage of Rs . 50 in the name ofY. Ramachandar and the same was cancelled and its payment was vide Ex. W53 in the name of Y. Raghu . Ex. W60 was prepared in the name of Y. Raghu . But actual payment of it was made through Ex. W61 in the name of 10036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 / AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Ex. W13 : Attendance -cum -payment made sheet for the month of April , 1995 .

Ex. W14 : Copy of letter to the Exec. Engineer , Hyderabaddt . 19-1-2002 .

Ex. W15 : Copy of letter showing the payment made to the Petitioner dt . 27-2-1999 on different names .

Ex. W16 : Copy of letter to Supdt. Engineer from Exec. Engineerdt. 25-3-1999 .

Ex. W17 : Attendance register maintained by WW1 from 1-11-1992 to 31-8-1995 ,

Ex . W18 : Attendance register maintained by WW1 from 1-9-1995 to 29-7-1996 .

Ex. W19 : Copy of voucher dt . 9-11-1992 .

Ex. W20 : Copy of voucher dt . 31-12-1992.

8. Much has been argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent in favour of the Petitioner and against the Petitioner respectively. But suffice it to say that those arguments need not be repeated here for the simple reason that MWI in his cross- examination had admitted that Ex . Ml to M27 has been filed by him as per the directions of the Court as they pertain to 1-5-95 to 10-7-96 , even if one year is taken a period of 12 months , I have calculated myself it exceeds 240 days and obviously that when period exceeds 240 days in a given year , Sec. 25F compulsorily has to be followed . Hence, the reference is answered as follows : "The action of the Management of CPWD , Hyderabad in terminating the services of Sri Y. Ramachandar, Typist- cum-Clerk by oral order w.e.f. 27-7-96 is not legal and justified . The Respondent is directd to appoint the Petitioner temporarily as Typist-cum- Clerk within 30 days from the publication of this Award failing which the Petitioner shall be entitled to Rs . 2000 per month after 30 days ofpublication of this Award. "

Ex. W21 : Copy of voucherdt . 21-1-1993 .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Ex. W22 : Copy of voucherdt. 24-2-1993 .

Ex. W23 : Copy of voucherdt. 10-3-1993.

Dictated to Kum. K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me, on this the 27th day of September, 2004 .

Ex. W24 : Copy of voucherdt . 31-3-1993 .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer

Ex. W25 : Copy of voucherdt . 24-4-1993 .

Appendix of Evidence

Ex. W26 : Copy of voucherdt. 4-6-1993 .

Ex. W27 : Copy of voucher dt . 7-6-1993 .

Witness examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

Ex. W28 : Copy of voucherdt . 19-6-1993 .

WWI : Sri Y. Rama- chandar

MW1 : Sri V. B. B. V. Siva Prasad

Ex . W29 : Copy of voucherdt. 28-6-1993.

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex. W30 : Copy of voucherdt. 13-7-1993 .

Ex. WI : Copy of appointment order dt . 29-11-84 .

Ex. W31: Copy of voucherdt. 24-7-1993.

Ex. W32 : Copy of voucherdt . 26-7-1993 .

Ex. W2 Copy of sick intimation letter to the Respondentdt. 10-12-84 .

Ex. W33 : Copy of voucherdt. 12-10-1993 .

Ex . W3 Copy of joining report dt. 19-12-84 .

Ex . W34: Copy of voucher dt. 30-10-1993 .

Ex. W4 Copy of medical certificate dt . 18-12-84.

Ex. W35 : Copy of voucherdt. 8-11-1993 .

Ex. W5 Copy of representation dt. 30-7-96 .

Ex. W36 : Copy of voucher dt. 2-12-1993 .

Ex . W6 Postal acknowledgementdt . 30-7-96.

Ex. W37 : Copy of voucher dt . 7-12-1993 .

Ex. W7 Copy of another representationdt . 20-4-98 .

Ex. W38 : Copy of voucherdt. 10-12-1993 .

Ex. W8 Postal receipt dt. 22-4-98 .

Ex. W39: Copy of voucherdt. 5-1-1994.

Ex. W9 EMS speed post postal acknowledgement dt. 12-5-98 .

Ex . W40: Copy of voucherdt. 24-1-1994.

Ex . W10 : Copy of representation dt . 4-10-99 .

Ex . W41 : Copy of voucherdt . 5-2-1994 .

Ex. W11 : Receipt of sending Ex. W10.

Ex . W42: Copy of voucher dt. 19-2-1994 .

Ex. W12 : Acknowledgement to Ex. W10 .

Ex. W43: Copy of voucher dt. 4-4-1994 .

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Ex. W44 : Copy of voucher dt. 4-4-1994 .

Ex. W45 : Copy of voucherdt . 3-5-1994 .

Ex . W46 : Copy of voucherdt. 24-6-1994 .

Ex. W47 : Copy of voucherdt . 3-5-1994 .

Ex. W48 : Copy of voucherdt . 24-6-1994 .

Ex . W49 : Copy of voucherdt. 29-4-1994 .

Ex. W50 : Copy of voucherdt . 9-5-1994.

Ex . W51: Copy of voucherdt . 18-6-1994 .

Ex. W52 : Copy of voucherdt. 8-6-1994 .

Ex . W53 : Copy of voucherdt. 10-6-1994 .

Ex. W54 : Copy of voucherdt . 18-6-1994 .

Ex. W55 : Copy of voucherdt. 16-7-1994 .

Ex. W56 : Copy of voucherdt . 19-6-1994 .

Ex. W57 : Copy of voucherdt. 3-8-1994 .

Ex . W58 : Copy of voucherdt. 30-7-1994 .

Ex. W59 : Copy of voucher dt. 24-8-1994 .

Ex . W60: Copy of voucherdt. 31-8-1994 .

Ex. W61 : Copy of voucherdt . 31-8-1994 .

Ex . W62 : Copy of voucherdt . 10-10-1994.

Ex . W63 : Copy of voucherdt . 31-10-1994 Ex . W64 : Copy of voucherdt . 1-11-1994 .

Ex . W65 : Copy of voucherdt. 16-11-1994.

Ex . W66 : Copy of voucherdt . 26-11-1994.

Ex. W67 : Copy of voucherdt . 23-12-1994.

Ex. W68 : Copy of voucher dt . 3-2-1995 .

Ex. W69 : Copy of voucherdt. 2-3-1995 .

Ex . W70 : Copy of voucherdt. 10-3-1995 .

Ex . W71 : Copy of voucherdt . 18-4-1995.

Documents marked for the Respondent Ex . M1 Copy of voucherdt . nil Ex. M2 Copy of voucher dt. 1-5-1995 .

Ex . M3 Copy of voucherdt . 1-5-1995 .

Ex . M4 Copy of voucherdt . 1-5-1995.

Ex. M5 Copy of voucherdt . 31-5-1995.

Ex . M6 Copy of voucherdt . 31-5-1995 .

Ex . M7 Copy of voucherdt . 31-5-1995 .

10037

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

Ex. M8 Copy of voucherdt. 17-8-1995 .

Ex. M9 : Copy of voucher dt . 17-8-1995.

Ex . M10 : Copy of voucherdt. 4-9-1995 .

Ex. M11 : Copy of voucher dt. 4-9-1995 .

Ex . M12 : Copy of voucher dt . 4-9-1995 .

Ex. M13 : Copy of voucherdt . 7-10-1995 .

Ex. M14 : Copy of voucher dt. 7-10-1995.

Ex. M15 : Copy of voucherdt. 7-10-1995 .

Ex. M16 : Copy of voucherdt. 13-11-1995 .

Ex. M17 : Copy of voucher dt . 30-11-1995.

Ex. M18 : Copy of voucherdt . 22-12-1995 .

Ex. M19 : Copy of voucher dt. 8-1-1996 .

Ex . M20 : Copy of voucherdt . 17-2-1996.

Ex. M21 : Copy of voucher dt . 23-3-1996 .

Ex . M22 : Copy of voucher dt . 15-4-1996 .

Ex. M23 : Copy of voucherdt . 15-4-1996 .

Ex. M24 : Copy of voucher dt. 10-5-1996.

Ex . M25: Copy of voucherdt. 18-6-1996.

Ex .M26 : Copy of voucherdt. 10-7-1996 .

Ex. M27 : Copy of voucher dt. nil

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3236. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी. आई.डी. नम्बर 8/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल. 22013/1/2004- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 S.O. 3236. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L.C.I.D. No. 8/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L- 22013/1 / 2004- IR(C - II )] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer 10038 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR

COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer

Dated the 29th day of October, 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.L.D. NO . 8/2004

BETWEEN :

Sri Ch. Andraiah,

S/o Mallaiah ,

C/ o H.No. 2-2-20/B/7-18 ,

informing Respondents over telephone wherever insisted onwritten applications . Besides he was a Secretary ofthe Workers ' Union by name S.C. Labour Union and for the past 5 years , he was the General Secretary of their Union . The Petitioner's name appears in the list of office bearers to be treated as protection workmen under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That the Petitioner's attendance fell short to 91 days during 1998. On 22-7-99 the Respondent issued a charge sheet alleging that he was in the habit of habitual late attendance in duty without sufficient cause. The Petitioner submitted his explanation, yet an enquiry was conducted and the Enquiry Report was dated 3-10-01 was submitted with a copy to the Petitioner and much was said against the enquiry but this Court heard the arguments on validity of domestic enquiry on 8-6-2004 and passed a detailed order on 28-7-2004 holding that the domestic enquiry was validly conducted.

Petitioner

Il Floor, Beside Anitha Apartments , D.D. Colony, Baghamberpet , Hyderabad.

AND

1. The Chief General Manager, Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , Ramagundam Area- 1 , Karimnagar District .

2. The General Manager, Godavarikhani II-A incline , Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , Godavarikhani ,

Karimnagar District.

Respondents

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner :

M/s. T. Hanumantha Reddy, P. Madhavi Devi , B. Ravinder Reddy, Advocates .

For the Respondent : M/ s. K. Srinivasa Murthy, V.. Uma Devi , C. Vijay Sekhar Reddy & S. Vijay Venkatesh , Advocates.

AWARD

3. It is further averred in the petition that his dismissal from service after the enquiry was conducted. EnquiryOfficer gave a report on 2-12-2002 is bad because many people with less muster rolls were continued in service like Sri M. Rajanrao having 88 musters , Sri K. Rajanrao having 83 musters, Sri V. Pasha Mallu having 94 musters and Sri Rangu Lingaiah having 71 musters . They were given only minor punishments or stoppage of increments . Hence, this shows that they were ofvindictive attitude towards the Petitioner . It is pertinent that 4 years back the Petitioner has participated in a movement levelling serious allegations against 163 officers of the respondent organization alleging that they were involved in corrupt practices . Under these circumstances the Government of Andhra Pradesh was pleased to constitute aHouse Committee to enquire into the matter and in the said enquiry Petitioner took active part in bringing to light the acts of the said officials . Hence , the officials bore grudge against the Petitioner resulting in the impugned proceedings which is malafide. Further, the Petitioner organized fast against the illegal removal of office bearers of trade unions . He filed Writ Petition No. 25419/2002 before the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. challenging the dismissal order . The Respondent filed their counter and took objection that the Petitioner has not approached the Hon'ble Tribunal . Hence, he has approached this Tribunal. Therefore , it is prayed that the dismissal order dated 2-12-2002 may be set aside and he may be directed to be reinstated into service with full back wages , continuity of service and all other attendant benefits .

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A(2 ) of the 1. D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petition are:

That the Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on 16-6-82 and later on regularized his services and appointed as coal filler in 1988. The Petitioner workman had fallen sick in 1998. Whenever he was sick he was

4. A counter was filed stating that the allegation that he used to inform by telephone is wrong . Further it is also mandatory under the Mines Act to maintain hospitals that are manned by the qualified medical practitioners . The contention of the Petitioner that he is General Secretary is far from true. Neither it is a recognized union nor it is a representative status union. That he has fully participated in the enquiry, he pleaded guilty of the 10039 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

service, his period of service shall be counted from 1982 till 2-12-2002 only for the purposes of terminal benefits that too if he puts in minimum musters for 3 consecutive years only then, his services should be regularized as coal filler and the past services will be counted for his retirement benefits . If he is not reinstated within 30 days from the publication of this Award he shall be entitled for the last pay drawn after 30 days of publication of this Award.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me, on this the 29th day ofOctober, 2004.

charges . That show cause notice was issued on 8-11-2001 . The Petitioner submitted a representation dated 25-11-2001 which was examined carefully and the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved and the Respondent dismissed the services of the Petitioner from 5-12-2002 . That the other four persons mentioned by the Petitioner were also issued charge sheets for absenteeism and whereas the Petitioner although attended 91 days in 1998 , in 1999 for 103 days and in 2000 for 109 days , whereas other four mentioned made their attendance substantial and hence , they were given a like punishment or a chance . Hence , the Petitioner has put in 91 days in 1998, 103 days in 1999, 109 days in 2000, 104 days in 2001 and 79 days in 2002 upto September. This clearly shows that he is not interested in working .

Appendix of evidence

5. Arguments were heard under Sec . 11A as the domestic enquiry is held valid by this Court vide order dated 28-7-2004 .

Witnesses examined for

the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent 6. Much argument is made by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner over the issue that the Petitioner is a union leader and there was grudge against him and the punishment is disproportionate .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer NIL NIL Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL Documents marked for the Respondent NIL नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2004

7. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent argued that after the issuance of the charge sheet in 1998 also his methods , attitude did not change and he continued the same for not one year or two years but four years , i.e. , from 1999 to 2002. That the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that absenteeism should not be taken lightly and further the conduct of the Petitioner from 1999 to 2002 also may be seen which is not a happy one .

का. आ. 3237.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.सी. सी.एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद (संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी. आई.डी. नम्बर 198/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 22013/1/2004- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004

S.O. 3237. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.L.C.I.D. No. 198/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

8. It may be seen that the Petitioner's conduct is not satisfactory after the issuance of the charge sheet also . He deserves no sympathy. From 1999 till 2002 he did not improve. He has been appointed in 1982 as a badli filler and later regularized as coal filler . His attitude is not sincere and he calls himself a union leader and says that he used to inform on telephone about his absence and the Management never insisted for written leave letter . This appears to be totally false. He as a union leader should know that he can not always telephone and never give any leave letter . Further, his attitude towards his service is also not sincere right from 1998 till he was dismissed. He styled himself as union leader and thought that he can do whatever he likes . He gives the instances of others who improved their attendance to the maximum whereas he continued to be lethargic and absenting himself frequently without any notice . However, I am of the opinion that one last chance can be given to him on certain conditions . An Award is passed directing the Respondent to reinstate him within 30 days from the publication of the award on the last pay drawn by setting aside the dismissal order dated 2-12-2002 . The period from 2-12-2002 till he is reinstated shall not be counted for his

[No. L- 22013 / 1 /2004 - IR( C- II) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer 10040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] ANNEXURE

and younger brother and his wife underwent an operation . As such he has to be with his wife resulting in absenting for few a days . Hence , he may be reinstated with back wages .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer

Dated the 11th day of October, 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.L.D. NO . 198/2003

BETWEEN :

3. In the counter much is written about the enquiry which need notbe repeated here as the enquiry is conceded. In fact nothing is written much except about the enquiry. As to how his performance is during , subsequent to the charge , that he has absented himself in the year 2000 having put in only 76 days attendance . Hence, the petition may be dismissed.

Sri K. Durgaiah ,

S/o Lingaiah ,

C/ o Smt . A. Sarojana ,

Advocate ,

4. Arguments were advanced as it was conceded by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that enquiry is validly conducted . Arguments were advanced under Sec . 11A by both the counsels .

4-5-592 , Kutbiguda,

Petitioner

Hyderabad.

AND

1. The General Manager,

M/ s . Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , RG- 2 Area , Godavarikhani , Karimnagar District .

2. The Colliery Manager ,

M/ s. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. ,

GDK, 8A - Incline,

Godavarikhani ,

Karimnagar District

Respondents

5. It is arguedby the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner has given a statement during the enquiry that he could not attend regularly due to the ill -health of his younger brother and his wife has undergone operation and if the explanation given by the Petitioner is genuine. He ought not to have been dismissed. Further, it is not mentioned in the counter as to how he has attended during 2001 and 2002. That means his attendance was very much regular. Otherwise, it would have found a place in the counter. Hence, he submits that the said order of dismissal dated 13-8-2002 may be set aside and the Petitioner may be reinstated with all back wages .

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner :

M/ s . A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates .

For the Respondent :

6. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondent that absenteeism is not a thing to be taken so lightly and in the enquiry the Petitioner has admitted his guilt, he says his wife was not well and his brother was not well but he has not filed any documents in support of the same. Hence , the petition may be dismissed .

M/ s . K. Srinivasa Murthy, V. Uma Devi , C. Vijay Sekhar Reddy & S. Vijay Venkatesh , Advocates .

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A(2 ) of the I. D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petition are; That he was initially appointed as Badli filler in 1987 and was confirmed as coal filler in 1995 , charge sheet was issued on 7-3-2001 that the Petitioner has put in only 76 days attendance during the year 2000. Accordingly, an enquiry was conducted. He was issued with a charge sheet and ultimately vide orders dated 13-8-2002 he was dismissedfrom 9-8-2002 which may be set aside as his absence was not wanton , but due to ill - health of his wife

7. It may be seen that the Petitioner seems to be a regular worker and perhaps he is a habitual absentee because in the dismissal order it is mentioned that his past record has been same and no extenuating circumstances are found to take a lenient view. In the counter there was no mention how he was dismissed on 13-8-2002 . Nothing is mentioned as to how was his performance during 2001-2002 whether he continued like that or he attended regularly. Further, seeing that he is appointed as a Badli Filler in 1987 and confirmed as coal filler in 1995 and dismissed from 9-8-2002 vide order dated 13-8-2002 , I am of the opinion that one more chance may be given to him with certain conditions . As Award is passed as follows ; " the Petitioner shall be reinstated in the minimum scale of coal filler within 30 days from the publication of this Award failing which he shall be entitled [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

10041 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

to the minimum pay scale after 30 days of the publication of this Award. He will not be entitled for any back wages or any other benefits except that his service from 1987 till 9/13-8-2002 shall be counted for the purposes of terminal benefits . The Petitioner shall be confirmed only ifhe puts in minimum muster rolls for 3 consecutive years" .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 11th day of October, 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.LD. NO . 213/2002

BETWEEN :

Dictated to Kum. K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me, on this the 11th day of October, 2004 .

Sri B. Kumar Swamy,

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

S/o Late Sailoo , H.No. 10-2-138 , Beside Rama Talkies , Rama Talkies Basti,

Petitioner

Kothagudem -507101

AND

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

NIL

1. The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , Kothagudem. District Khammam .

Documents marked for the Petitioner

2. TheManager ,

NIL

M/s. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. ,

5 A Incline, Kothagudem.

Documents marked for the Respondent

District Khammam .

Respondents

APPEARANCES:

NIL

For the Petitioner :

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

M/ s . Satwath Rana & Mohd . Salahuddin , Advocates .

For the Respondent : M/ s . K. Srinivasa Murthy, C. Vijay Sekhar Reddy & G. Praveen Kumar, Advocates

AWARD

का. आ. 3238.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट. औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी.आई.डी. नम्बर 213/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A(2) of the I. D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

[सं. एल-22013 /1/2004- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004

S.O. 3238.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.L.C.I.D. No. 213/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L- 22013/ 1 /2004 - IR(C - II ) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petition are: That the Petitioner was sponsored by employment exchange , Kothagudem and selected for the post ofBadli filler and was appointed as Badli Filler in 5 B incline in the year 1983 having been trained and terminated for some time for want of requirement and again he is appointed vide appointment letter dated 31-1-1984 . Again his services were terminated on 13-5-1985 . The Petitioner is again called for appointment through letter dated 21-4-90 and resumed his duties from 20-5-90 . Having joined duty on 20-5-90 at 5 B incline the Petitioner is transferred and posted to 5A incline on 15-9-90 and in August, 1991 his services were terminated although he has put up 133 mustersfrom May, 1990 to June, 1991 . The repeated representations of the Petitioner were of no use . TheManagement taking a different yardstick in case 3606 G1/04-57 10042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926

ofthe Petitioner omitted his name in the office order dated 20-7-93 wherein all the other dis -empanelled workers are taken back on duty. That the union ultimately came to a settlement with all those workers who are terminated from 1997 will be considered. Hence , the oral termination dated 15-7-91 may be set aside and he may be reinstated with full back wages .

3. A counter was filed stating that the Petitioner was not regular in service . His services were terminated. But after entering into a settlement with the union the Management agreed to review and consider the cases of badlies /floating badlies whose services were terminated/ dis- empanelled on or after 1-1-85 due to absenteeism for re- employment as badlies if they were medically found fit within two months from the date of settlement . At the request of the Petitioner he was called for interview and posted to work at 5 B incline on 15-5-90. His appointment was for a period of 12 months and he should put in 190/ 240 musters. He has put in only 133 musters against the stipulated musters of 190. As such his services were terminated. Hence , he is not entitled for any relief.

4. The Petitioner was continuously absent and hence on the material available before me it can be clearly seen that this Petitioner was taken for 12 months , for the 3rd or 4th time, still he did not sincerely work and worked only for 133 days instead of 190 days and that happened till 15-7-91 and further he has not come to the witness box to prove bonafides in this case . Suffice it to say that his approaching the Court after a lapse of 11 years itself goes to show that he is not interested and further he did not conduct the case before this Court and he is continuously absent from 19-9-2003 goes to show that he is not interested and there is no material before me to come to a conclusion otherwise that the Petitioner is entitled for any benefit . Hence , I hold that the Petitioner is not entitled for any relief.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Kum. K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant , transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me , on this the 11th day of October , 2004 .

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3239.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 257 / 2002) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/31/ 2002- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 29th November, 2004 S.O. 3239.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. 257/2002 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

[No. L - 12012/31 / 2002- IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 27th day of September, 2004 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 257/2002 BETWEEN :

Sri N. Krishna,

S/o N. Dathu ,

H.No. 7-1-164 , Ameerpet , Above ABC Copy Centre ,

....Petitioner Hyderabad -500016.

AND

The Dy. General Manager,

Canara Bank,

Circle Office , Opp . Old MLA Qtrs . , Hyderabad - 500007.

Respondent APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner :

Sri K. Narayana Rao , Advocate

For the Respondent : M/ s . P. Suresh & K. Rajendra Prasad , Advocates 10043 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

AWARD

It is enough if I give a phone call to Vijayawada lorry. When, they proceed by scooter, if lorry coming from behind runs over them, they will be finished" . Hence , after a detailed enquiry , the punishment of compulsory retirement was imposed . Hence , the petition may be dismissed .

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L - 12012/31 /2002 - IR(B.II) dated 28-6-2002 referred the following dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the employers in relation to the Management of Canara Bank and their workman.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in ordering compulsory retirement from service to Shri N. Krishna , workman vide order dated 21-8-2000 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "

4. An enquiry was conducted. Actually it ought to have been decided , whether domestic enquiry was conducted validly. But , unfortunately, by oversight , it was not done in the present case. Unfortunately, somehow, the said point was missed and neither the Petitioner's Counsel brought to my notice nor the Respondent's counsel andwitnesses were allowed to be examined . Any way what is done cannot be undone . As the witnesses are examined and arguments were advanced, I have now no option but to go through the evidence.

This reference was registered as Industrial Dispute No. 257/2002 and notices were issued to the parties.

5. The Petitioner deposed the same facts as in the petition, in the chief examination and said that he joined as sweeper in the year 1970 and subsequently he was : promoted as attender in the year 1978. Late he go promotion as a clerk in 1982. That he was acquitted by theMetropolitan Magistrate vide Ex. W1 dt. 19-6-2002. In the cross examination he admitted that on 14-7-94 , a punishment of censure was imposed for threatening his officer and snatching away the loan application . He also admitted that punishment for the stoppage of increment for three years with cumulative effect was imposed for man handling Senior Manager of Mettuguda branch and throwing suit case and abusing Sri K. Yagna Narayana. It is true that on 6-12-99 after insuing charge sheet he participated in the enquiry and he was awarded compulsory retisement . That for absence also a charge sheet was issuedion 18-11-99 . It is true that in these 22 years of service he was charge shested number of times and punishod several times .

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the claim statement are: That the Petitioner has worked for 22 years as clerk with R1 upto 8-11-1999 . It is submitted that a charge sheet was issued on6-12-99 alleging that the workman has abused the Branch Manager and for that a punishment of compulsory retirement is imposed which is disproportionate to the alleged offence on 8-11-99 for granting festival loan and as there was lot of murmuring that the Petitioner is an indecent man. He remained absent from 9-11-99 to 18-12-99 . That for the above period he submitted leave application with medical certificates and the intention was to prevent further misunderstanding and provocation of disturbance of peaceace and harmony. The Respondent lodged a police complaint against the Petitioner and the same is disposed off by the Hon'ble Magistrate with CC No. 275/99 under Sec. 506 of IPC by Hon'ble VI Metropolitan Magistrate , Hyderabad . Hence , the order of dismissal may be set aside and he may be reinstated.

6. The Management examined Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, SeniorManager, whom the Petitioner has threatened on 8-11-99 stating, "You are responsible , you have not recommended for sanction of loan and I will not leave you and the bank and see your end" . Again he said, " I have beaten two Managers , this time I see that I arrange lorryaccidents and these people are killed". The Petitioner was absent from 9-11-1991 to 31-3-2000 unauthorisedly. On 27-11-99 the Petitioner came to the branch and wanted to discuss with him . He informed him that as his daughter was unwell, he had to go to hospital, he requested the 2nd Line Manager , Sri M.M. Reddy to close the premises . The Petitioner went to Sri M. M. Reddy and was conversant with him . After closing the premises Sri M.M. Reddy came and informed him and then the Petitioner asked him why he was giving evidence against him in Departmental Enquiry and threatened him that he would see his end . The Petitioner has come in a car with another person. That they were afraid and waited, when they were going he followed in the car. They got afraid and 3. A counter was filed stating that the Petitioner has a past record of threatening his immediate superiors and earlier also no charge sheets were issued to him . On 26-5-94, the Petitioner was issued a charge sheet for threatening his officer and snatching away the loan application from the hands of the officer . On 14-7-94 vide proceedings No. HDAC 436 E 3794 , a punishment of Censure was imposed . On 22-11-94, he was issued with another charge sheet for manhandling the Senior Manager ofMettuguda branch Sri K. Yagna Narayana for throwing the brief case against the wooden cabin, causing damage to cabin. For this act he was imposed the punishment of Stoppage of increment for a period of three years with cumulative effect . The Petitioner in spite of the above threatened the Senior Manager that he would kill him and II Line Manager. On 8-11-99 while the Petitioner was working as clerk at Lallapet branch , Hyderabad he entered the cabin and shouted in Telugu , translation of which is as follows , "Earlier, I bet two Managers , Now, I will not touch them. I will finish them in a lorry accident.

10044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] telephoned to the police . In the cross examination he stated that WWI sent an application without signature .

7. The Management examined Sri M. Mallikarjuna Reddy, Senior Manager who also stated that the Petitioner threatened him that he would see him and about his following in the car . He was cross examined and denied that no such incident took place .

compensation for having put in 22 years of services besides other benefits . The said lenient view is shown because he has still got 10 years of service and perhaps the only fault with him is he is apparently arrogant . Hence , the Respondent bank is directed to pay Rs . 44,000 to the Petitioner within 30 days from the publication of this Award, failing which he will be entitled to receive Rs. 44,000 with 6 % p.a. interest after 30 days of publication of this Award .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Kum. K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me, on this the 27th day of September, 2004.

8. Sri V. Kesava Rao , Chief Manager, Munirka branch . New Delhi deposed as MW3 . That Ex. M4 is the enquiry proceedings and all that . In the cross examination it is deposed that he did not actively participate in the enquiry till the Court decides the criminal case, the enquiry may be pending . By that time he gave the enquiry report as he is the Enquiry Officer.

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

WWI : Sri N. Krishna

9. Much has been argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner . That as he has acquitted in the criminal case his case may be considered sympathetically. When the criminal court has acquitted him there is no question ofhis being compulsorily retired by conducting domestic enquiry.

MW 1 : Sri Y. Koteswara Rao MW 2 : Sri M. Mallikarjuna Reddy

MW 3 : Sri V. Kesava Rao

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex. WI : Copy of order in C.C. No. 389/2000 dt. 19-6-2002

10. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent submitted that in view of his categorical admission that he was several times charge sheeted and punished and previously also punishment of stoppage of increment for three years with cumulative effect. Hence, he is not entitled to any relief.

Documents marked for the Respondent

Ex.MI : Lr. No. 10 : HO : Staff : 644 : 99 : YKR dt. 9-11-99

Ex. M2: Lr. dt . 10-11-99 by Sri Y. Koteswara Rao to the Investigating Officer

Ex. M3 : Office copy of the Lr . No. ENQ : NK : 1 : 2000 to WW1 dt. 4-2-2000

Ex. M4: Enquiry proceedingsdt. 3-2-2000

Ex. M5 : Enquiry proceedings dt . 21-2-2000

Ex. M6 : Enquiry proceedingsdt. 13-3-2000

Ex . M7 : Enquiry proceedingsdt. 14-3-2000

Ex. M8 : Enquiry proceedings dt. 17-4-2000

Ex. M9 : Findings of the Enquiry Officer dt . 6-12-99

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2004

का. आ. 3240. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

11. It may be seen that it would not be desirable to reinstate such a person , if he goes back into the bank where the staff is supposed to be polite not only to the valued customers but also with the co- staff and superior staff. Reinstating such a person, although might have been acquitted in the crinunal case is adding insult to the injury and further although belated due to mistake , but , I have gone through the enquiry and apparently there is nothing to hold that the domestic enquiry is not validly conducted, because the Enquiry Officer fulfilled all the five conditions laiddown in A.I.R. 1963 page 1914. The Hon'ble Supreme Court for deciding validity of an enquiry. Hence , I also hold that as all the five conditions mentioned in the above Judgement viz. , " ( 1 ) The employee proceeded against has been informed clearly of the charges levelled against him; ( 2) The witnesses are examined-ordinarily in the presence of the employee in respect of the charges ; (3 ) The employee is given a fair opportunity to cross examine the witnesses; (4) He is given a fair opportunity to examine witnesses including himself in his defence if he so wishes on any relevant matter; and (5 ) The Enquiry Officer records his findings with reasons for the same in his report are fulfilled, the domestic enquiry conducted is valid . Hence , the reference is answered as follows : " The action of the Management of Canara Bank in ordering compulsory retirement from service to Shri N. Krishna , workman vide order dated 21-8-2000 is legal andjustified. Further, the Petitioner is entitled to Rs . 44,000 as

[सं. एल. 12011/166/2001- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव 10045 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

SCHEDULE

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004

"Whether the action of the management of the Syndicate Bank , Zonal Office , Hyderabad in ordering dismissal of the services of Sri P. Vinod Kumar, Attender is justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

This reference was registered as Industrial Dispute No. 3/2002 and notices were issued to the parties.

S.O. 3240. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

[No. L- 12011 / 166/2001 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer

Dated the 19th day of October , 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ΝΟ . 3/2002

BETWEEN :

The General Secretary,

Syndicate Bank Staff Association,

Anand Plaza, II Floor ,

Near Anand Rao Circle ,

... Petitioner/Union

Bangalore-9.

AND

The Dy. General Manager,

Syndicate Bank ,

2. The brief facts stated in the claim statement are : That the Mr. P. Vinod Kumar joined the services in the year 1984 as attender at Hyderabad . He was transferred in.April, 1995from Golkonda, Hyderabad to Bodhan upto 30-6-1995 . Thereafter he was transferred to Divisional Office, Anantapur in June , 1995 and worked there till he was dismissed on 10-4-1996 . That he was not paid his salary from February, 1994 to July, 1995 and also arrears ofwages on account of VI Bipartite settlement and his repeated representations for salary and wage arrears etc. , fell on deaf ears. Further he was falsely implicated in a case involving alleged fraudulent withdrawal to the extent ofRs . 23000 on 30-5-95 while working at Bodhan branch of the II party bank and a confession letter was forcibly obtained from Mr. P. Vinod Kumar. That Mr. P. Vinod Kumar was served with a chargesheet dated 18-11-95 and an enquiry was conducted without following the principles of natural justice and much is written about the enquiry and the appeal filed by him . But , this Court by an order dated 28-10-1992 held that the domestic enquiry is validly conducted . Hence , the same need not be gone through . That he did not committed the alleged misconduct . Charges were foisted on him for his trade union activities . Non-payment of wages for 18 months and also arrears of wages on account of wage revision speak volumes . Hence , the dismissal order dated 10-4-96 may be set aside and he maybe ordered to be reinstated with continuity of service and back wages.

SB, Zonal Office , Pioneer House , 6-3-653 , Somajiguda, Hyderabad -500082 .

Respondent/Management

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner :

M/ s . D. Vijaya Krishna Mohan , K. Pinakapani & Y. Sesidhar Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent : M/ s . A. Krishnam Raju , G. Dinesh Kumar, G.V.N. Babu , N.P. Rao & T.P. Das , Advocates

AWARD

3. A Counter was filed stating that the salary was not paid to him and salary arrears are not germane to the dispute referred by the Government of India to this Tribunal . It is true that the Management had served the chargesheet on 18-11-95 . But the enquiry was conducted complying with all the principles of natural justice and afterwards he was dismissed and the appeal was also dismissed . That the punishment awarded will commensurate with the latches on his part . That the Mr. P. Vinod Kumar participated in the enquiry and confessed his acts of misconduct . Hence , Mr. P. Vinod Kumar is not entitled for any relief .

4. As already this Court held vide order dated 28-10-2002 that the domestic enquiry is validly conducted. Hence, arguments were heard under Sec . 11A. Written arguments were submitted by the Learned Counsel for the Mr. P. Vinod Kumar and oral arguments were heard by the Respondent's Counsel .

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 12011/ 166/2001-1R (B - II ) dated 28-11-2001 referred the following dispute under section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the employers in relation to the Management of Syndicate Bank and their workman.

10046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

5. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Union that for 13 years Mr. P. Vinod Kumar has served the bank faithfully. It is alleged that Mr. P. Vinod Kumar made wrong entries in the books pertaining to one account holder Mr. Ramesh and issued withdrawal form for withdrawing the amounts. The said fact is clearly shown in the chargesheet issued by the Respondent. The Respondent did not pay the salary of Mr. P. Vinod Kumar from February, 1994 to July, 1995 for the reasons best known to the Petitioner. But the Management did not pay the same. It amounts to unfair labour practice . Admittedly Mr. Vinod Kumar did not withdrew but only admitted to withdraw and the said Mr. Ramesh , account holder had not been examined by the Respondent in order to prove charges . The Respondent ignored the letters dated 30-5-95 submitted by Mr. P. Vinod Kumar where he categorically stated about the facts and circumstances and pressurize tactics played by the superiors . He submitted that the Madras High Court held that, " alleged admission of guilt on the part of workmen does not dispense with legal requirement by the employer and the proceedings in consequent to the same are not sustainable" . Hence the dismissal order may be set aside and he may be reinstated.

6. The Respondent's counsel argued that it is a case where there is admitted fraud for Rs . 23,000 . That there is an attempt to withdraw Rs. 23,000 and play fraud on the bank and if he had succeeded perhaps he would have done more. It is therefore , submitted that any time on the part of the Petitioner involving money liability that too being a sub - staff undermines the credibility of the bank .

7. It may be noted that no doubt in the counter it is stated that not paying the salary, or salary every month is not germane to the issue but can a sub - staff survive when his salary is not paid from February, 1994 to July, 1995 and also arrears of wages on account of VI Bipartite settlement . It is quite possible that out of frustration or due to sheer need of money, the Petitioner should have resorted to this . It is asking that the Management does not come up with any explanation as to why his salary was not paid for 18 months and this case of involving withdrawal was on 30-5-95 when his salary was not paid for February, March, April and May. No doubt, by that time he had not received the salary only for four months . But that cannot be a ground for the Petitioner, i.e. , Mr. Vinod Kumar to resort to such an act by managing to open an account in the name of one Mr. Ramesh and tried to withdraw Rs . 23,000 illegally. But for such an act I have no hesitation in holding the bank also equally responsible in having not paid a sub - staff his salary for four months by then , or the Management has not come with any explanation before this Court to appreciate as to whether any genuine reasons by the Management with holding the salary of the Petitioner for four months by then. Be that may be so . The bank has to share a part of

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

the responsibility in the abnormal behaviour of the delinquent employee . But when it comes to the question ofthe money and that too such a large extent by a well- planned method, it will not be desirable to reinstate the Petitioner but in the circumstances, I am of the opinion that he deserves a lesser punishment. Hence, the reference isanswered as follows : The action of the Management of the Syndicate Bank , Zonal Office , Hyderabad in ordering dismissal ofthe services of Shri P. Vinod Kumar, Attender isnotjustified and the order of dismissal dated 10-4-1996 is modified into one of compulsory retirement on 10-4-1996 and he shall be entitled for all benefits (of compulsory retirement) .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronouncedby me on this the 19th day of October, 2004.

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for Witnesses examined for theRespondent

the Petitioner NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL Documents marked for the Respondent NIL नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ.. 3241.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आन्ध्रा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 93/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12011/91/2001- आई . आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 S.O. 3241. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 93/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of AndhraBank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L - 12011 /91 /2001 - IR(B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]

10047

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail, B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 30th day of September, 2004 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 93/2001 BETWEEN :

Andhra Bank Award Employees Union,

C/ o Andhra Bank ,

Eluru Road Branch ,

.... Petitioner The Joint Secretary, Swarnalok Complex , Governorpet, Vijayawada- 520001 .

AND

The Asstt . General Manager,

Andhra Bank ,

......Respondent Zonal Office , A.B. Buildings , R.R. Appa Rao Street , Vijayawada - 520001 .

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner :

M/s . G. Vidya Sagar, K. Udaya Sree , P. Sudheer Rao , B. Shivakumar & D. Madhusudhan , Advocates .

Forthe Respondent : M/ s . S. Udayachala Rao , S. Lavanya Lakshmi , S. Vikramaditya Babu & S. Mujib Kumar, Advocates .

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 12011 / 91 /2001 - IR(B.II ) dated 9/10-7-2001 referred the following dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act . 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of Andhra Bank and their workman . The reference is ,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Andhra Bank, Vijayawada over non - regularisation of the services of Sri U. Koteswara Rao . Part - time Sweeper is justified ? If not , what relief is the workman entitled to ? י

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 93/2001 and notices were issued to the parties .

2. Sri B.V. V. Kondal Rao , General Secretary of the Petitioner union was examined as WW1 after the claim statement and counter were filed. The reference is about non-regularisation of the services of Sri U. Koteswara Rao, eventhe affected party is absent . WW1 examined himself on 17-7-2003 and for more than one year and two months he has not appeared for cross examination, which shows that he is not interested in pursuing the case . Similarly, the affected party, Sri . U. Koteswara Rao also has not appeared in the Court. So , waiting for one year and two months is sufficient time and there is nothing on record to give any relief to the Petitioner/affected party Sri U. Koteswara Rao . Hence , a ' Nil ' Award is passed. Transmit.

Accordingly a ' Nil ' Award is passed , Transmit .

Dictated to Kum. K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 30th day of September, 2004.

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3242. - 3 242.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आंन्ध्रा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 91/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 12011/85/2001- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 S.O. 3242.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 91/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Andhra Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

[No. L- 12011 /85 /2001 - IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

10048 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926 [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer

Dated the 30th day of September, 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 91/2001

statement and counter were filed. The reference is about non -regularisation of the services ofSmt. Somi Varalaxmi , eventhe affected party is absent. WW1 examined himself on 17-7-2003 and for more than one year and two months he has not appeared for cross examination, which shows that he is not interested in pursuing the case . Similarly, the affected party, Smt . Somi Varalaxmi also has not appeared in the Court . So , waiting for one year and two months is sufficient time and there is nothing on record to give any reliefto the Petitioner/affected party Smt . Somi Varalaxmi . Hence, a ' Nil ' Award is passed . Transmit .

BETWEEN :

Accordingly a ' Nil ' Award is passed. Transmit.

The Joint Secretary,

Andhra Bank Award Employees Union ,

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 30th day of September, 2004.

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer C/ o Andhra Bank, Eluru Road Branch , Swarnalok Complex, Governorpet, Vijayawada - 520001 .

Petitioner

Appendix of Evidence

AND

The Asstt . General Manager,

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, A.B. Buildings , R.R. Appa Rao Street, Vijayawada- 520001 .

Respondent

NIL

APPEARANCES :

Documents marked for the Respondent For the Petitioner :

NIL

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर, 2004

M/s. G. Vidya Sagar, K. Udaya Sree , P. Sudheer Rao , B. & D. Madhusudhan , Advocates . Shivakumar

For the Respondent: M/ s . S. Udayachala Rao , S. Lavanya Lakshmi , S. Vikramaditya Babu & S. Mujib Kumar , Advocates .

AWARD

का. आ. 3243.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आन्ध्रा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 92/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 12011/84/2001- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by itsorder No. L- 12011 /85/2001 - IR(B.II ) dated 9/10-7-2001 referred the following dispute under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of Andhra Bank and their workman . The reference is,

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2004 SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Andhra Bank , Vijayawada over non - regularisation of the services of Smt . Somi Varalaxmi , Part-time Sweeper is justified ? If not , what relief is the workman entitled to ? "

S.O. 3243. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Andhra Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 91/2001 and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Sri B. V. V. Kondal Rao , General Secretary of the Petitioner union was examined as WW1 after the claim

[No. L - 12011 /84/2001 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

} [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

10049

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 30th day of September, 2004 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 92/2001 BETWEEN :

The Joint Secretary,

Andhra Bank Award Employees Union ,

C/ o Andhra Bank,

Eluru Road Branch,

Petitioner Swarnalok Complex , Governorpet , Vijayawada-520001 .

AND

The Asstt. General Manager,

Andhra Bank,

Respondent Zonal Office , A.B. Buildings , R.R. Appa Rao Street , Vijayawada- 520001 .

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : M/ s . G. Vidya Sagar , K. Udaya P.Sree, Sudheer Rao, B. Shivakumar & D. Madhusudhan, Advocates .

For the Respondent : M/ s . S. Udayachala Rao , S. Lavanya Lakshmi , S. Vikramaditya Babu & S. Mujib Kumar, Advocates .

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by itsorder No. L- 12011/ 84/2001 - IR(B.II) dated 9/10-7-2001 referred the following dispute under Section 10 (1 ) (d ) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of Andhra Bank and their workman . The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Andhra Bank, Vijayawada over non - regularisation of the services of Smt . P. Maheswari , Part- time Sweeper is justified ? If not, what relief is the workman entitled to ?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 92/2001 and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Sri B. V. V. Kondal Rao , General Secretary of the Petitioner union was examined as WWI after the claim 3606 GI/04-58

statement and counter were filed. The reference is about non-regularisation of the services of Smt . P. Maheswari , eventhe affected party is absent. WW1 examined himself on 17-7-2003 and for more than one year and two months he has not appeared for cross examination, which shows that he is not interested in pursuing the case . Similarly, the affectedparty, Smt . P. Maheswari also has not appeared in the Court . So , waiting for one year and two months is sufficient time and there is nothing on record to give any relief to the Petitioner/affected party Smt . P. Maheswari. Hence, a ' Nil ' Award is passed. Transmit .

Accordingly a ' Nil ' Award is passed. Transmit .

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 30th day of September, 2004.

E. ISMAIL, PresidingOfficer Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 29 नबम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3244. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आन्ध्रा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 289/ 2002) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 12012/26/2002- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 S.O. 3244. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 289/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cuin- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the Management of Andhra Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L - 12012/ 26/2002 - IR (B- II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

10050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 27th day of September, 2004 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 289/2002 BETWEEN :

Sri T.V.S. Prakash ,

S/o Surya Rao ,

Dusarapamu Post ,

Rajavommangi (Mandal) ,

East Godavari District.

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] He worked for various number of days and more so he workedfromMay, 2000 to April , 2001 , for 288 days but yet,unceremoniously his services were terminated verbally from 29th April , 2001 without issuing him any notice or pay in lieu of or paying him retrenchment compensation. Hence, the verbal order dated 29-4-2001 is illegal , arbitrary and he may be directed to be reinstated and with fullbackwages.

3. A counter was filed denying that the Petitioner was engaged from 1992 on daily wages and terminated orally on 29-4-2001 and that he worked for more than 240 days in 12 consecutive calendar months . That the Petitioner was engaged as casual labour for specific periods intermittently but not continuously as claimed by the Petitioner as such he does not get any right . Accordingly, the petition may be dismissed .

...... Petitioner

AND

The Deputy General Manager,

Andhra Bank ,

Zonal Office ,

Kakinada.

East Godavari District .

Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : M/ s . G. Rama Subba Rao & G.V.S. Ganesh , Advocates For the Respondent : M/ s . S. Udayachala Rao , S. Mujib Kumar , S. L. Lakshmi & S. Vikramaditya Babu ,

Advocates .

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L - 12012 /26/ 2002 - IR(B.II) dated 3-10-2002 referred the following dispute under Section 10 (1 ) ( d ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the employers in relation to the Management of Andhra Bank and their workman .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Management of Andhra Bank, Zonal Office , Kakinada in terminating the services of Sri T. V.S. Prakash, Ex . Temporary Sub- Staff, Rajavommangi Branch w.e.f. 29-4-2001 is legal andjustified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

This reference was registered as Industrial Dispute No. 289/2002 and notices were issued to the parties .

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petition are : Thatthe Petitioner filed a claim statement stating that he worked in the bank on daily wages in 1992. He was engaged on daily wages by the Respondent from 1992.

4. The Petitioner examined himself as WW1 . He deposed in the chief examination what all he stated in the petition. In the cross -examination he deposed that Sub- Staffmeans a person regularly appointed by the bank while casual labour means a person appointed on daily wages whenever his services are required . There is no evidence to show that he joined Rajavommangi Branch in 1992 . One Mr. Gantimalla Kondala Swamy is the only sub - staff in that branch. Even when Gantimalla Kondala Swamy was there his services were utilized . He denied that whenever Gantimalla Kondala Swamy used to go on leave he was engaged . In 1994 only he gave a complaint to higher authorities about artificial breaks . He has not filed any copy of the same . There are 27 persons in the panel prepared by Rajavommangi branch. He cannot give the names of thejuniors whose services have been regularised . One Mr. Raja Rao is appointed in his place . That he submitted a letter praying for empanelment but the same was not considered . Ex. W1 shows the payments made to him from 1992 till April, 2001. Ex. W2 to WI3 did not show the dates when his services were utilized .

5. The Respondent examined Sri B. Prasada Rao , LawOfficer ofAndhra Bank , Head Office , Hyderabad as MWI and he deposed that as regards to appointment and regularization oftemporary sub - staff the Respondent bank has entered into a settlement on 9-1-95 under the provisions of Sec . 12 , Sub- section 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act and in terms of the said provisions of the said settlement all those temporary employees who have put in 90 days or more services in the bank during the period 1-1-80 to 31-12-89 were empanelled district-wise .. The object of empanelling such temporary employees is to utilize their services initially in the leave vacancies of regular sub - staff and to absorb them in due course in bank's regular service . The Petitioner is not on the approved panel ofthe temporary sub - staff of E.G. District . So , he cannot be appointed even in leave vacancies . He never completed 240 days of service .

10051 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

6. In the cross -examination he deposed that he never worked in the Rajavommangi branch of the Respondent bank . He has not filed any proof to show the procedure of empanelment by the Respondent . He has not filedany proofto show the Petitioner is not on the approved panel. He cannot say as to what periods the Petitioner was deployed as casual labour. It is true that the services of the Petitioner were utilized by the Rajavommangi branch for specified periods unauthorisedly. It is true that the bank has not given any notice nor paid anything in lieu of notice or retrenchment compensation.

compliance of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947-Employer filed Writ Petition-High Court also held that Managemen did not lead any evidence on the issue of abandonment of service-Also relevant record of employment was not produced-Workman was engaged by the Petitioner off and on for about 11 years-Award of the Tribunal upheld" . He also relies on Zonal Manager, CentralBank of India Vs. Union of India and others (Patna HC): 2003 LLR 189 wherein it was held that, " .... Non- compliance of mandatory provision in making payment ofretrenchment compensation at the time of termination ofa workman on the ground that he has not worked for 240 days and as such he was not entitled to employment and regularisation-Reference made for adjudication- Management of Bank contended that the workman was supplying water and the price of water was paid to him- Besides evidence of witnesses- The letter from Branch Manager to the Regional Office categorically stated that the concerned workman performed the duty of sub- staff but was paid for storing water-The Industrial Tribunal directed reinstatement with full back wages and regularization of the workman " . He therefore, submits thatthe Petitioner may be reinstated.

9. The Respondent counsel submits that there is no proof that Petitioner was engaged for 240 days continuously even otherwise it is daily wage appointment and therefore Sec . 25F is not applicable .

7. The Management examined Sri A. K. Tripathy, Branch Manager, Andhra Bank , Rajavommangi branch as MW2. He deposed that panels of the temporary sub- staffwere prepared by the Respondent bank in terms of an Approach Paper issued by the Government of India dated 16-8-1990 and a 12(3 ) Settlement dated 9-1-95 entered into by the Respondent bank with the recognized union of the Award Staff functioning in the bank. The Petitioner was engaged as a casual labourer by his predecessors occasionally without having any power or authority to do so. He was paid the wages for the days he worked. He did not put in 240 days of service in any calendar year . Certified copy of Approach Paper is Ex. M1 . Copy of the settlement is Ex. M2. Panel of temporary sub -staff E.G. District is Ex. M3 . In the cross examination he deposed that Ex. M3 does not bear any date but it was prepared in pursuance of settlent dated 9-1-95 , Ex. M2 . That the Petitioner was engaged intermittently.

10. I have gone through Ex. W1 , Ex . W2 to Ex. W13 and the amounts and dates were tallied. It cannot be said that all are fabricated . But since in view of the restrictions placed by the bank on employment, I am of the opinion that a lumpsum compensation would meet the ends ofjustice. Hence , the reference is answered as follows: "The action of the Management of Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Kakinada in terminating the services of Shri T.V.S. Prakash, Ex. Temporary Sub - Staff, Rajavommangi branch w.e.f. 29-4-2001 is not legal and justified. However, in the circumstances , the Petitioner is not entitled for reinstatement but a lumpsum compensation ofRs . 25,000 plus Rs. 2000 towards costs of this litigation should be paid to the Petitioner within 30 days after publication of thisAward failing which he will be entitled to that amount with 6% interest P.A.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictatedto Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me, on this the 27th day of September, 2004 .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

WWI : Sri T.V.S. Prakash MW 1 : Sri B. Prasada Rao MW 2: Sri A.K. Tripathy

8. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner has worked for a continuous period of240 days during the 12 months period preceding the verbal termination from 29-4-2001 . Ex. W1 statement shows that he worked for 288 days from May, 2000 to April , 2001. Ex . W2 to W13 copies of the cash voucher evidencing payment of wages to the Petitioner for the months of May , 2000 to April , 2001. He relies on Divisional Engineer Telecom, Coaxial Cable Project, Rajahmundry Vs. Mamidi Venkata Ramana and Another (AP HC- DB): 2003 LLR 803 wherein it was held that, Mandatory conditions precedent for payment of retrenchment compensation at the time of termination.of services of the workmen-Non - compliance of the provision, the termination illegal-Workman has worked for more than 240 days continuously-Service terminated-Without complying with Section 25 -F- Illegal-Workman is entitled for continuity of service and back wages" . He also relied on Staste of Haryana Vs. Maman Ram and another (P & HYD HC- DB) : 2003 LLR 403 wherein it was held that, " .... Compliance of mandatory conditions in paying retrenchment compensation to a workman at the time of his termination -On termination, workman raised an industrial dispute -Reference made for adjudication- Industrial Tribunal held it to be illegal and invalid as it was without 10052 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

Documents marked for the Petitioner Ex . W1 : Copy of statement showing No. of working days and wages paid to the Petitioner Ex. W2: Copy of voucher dt. 8-6-2000

Ex. W3: Copy of voucherdt. 4-7-2000

Ex. W4: Copy of voucher dt. 8-8-2000

Ex . W5 : Copy of voucher dt . 12-9-2000

Ex. W6: Copy of voucherdt . 13-10-2000

Ex. W7 : Copy of voucherdt. 7-11-2000

Ex. W8 Copy of voucher dt . 7-12-2000

Ex . W9 : Copy of voucherdt . 4-9-2001

Ex. W10: Copy of voucherdt . 6-7-2001

Ex . W11: Copy of voucherdt . 2-3-2001

Ex. W12: Copy of voucher dt. 31-3-2001

Ex . W13 : Copy of voucherdt . 17 / 18-5-2001 Ex. W14: Copy of representation to ALC( C) by WWI dt. 20-8-2001

Ex . W15 : Copy of Ir . by ALC ( C ) dt. 12-9-2001 calling for conciliation .

Ex. W16 : Copy of order No. 7/ 38/ 2001 - ALC conciliation proceedingsdt . 14-12-2001 Documents marked for the Respondent Ex.M1 : Copy of approach paper No. F - 3 /3/ 104/87- IR dt. 16-8-90

Ex . M2 : Copy of 12 (3 ) settlementdt. 9-1-95 Ex . M3 Copy of panel of Temporary sub - staff of E.G. District

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3245. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 29/2000) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं . एल. 12012/20/2000- आई. आर. ( बी-11 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004

S.O. 3245. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 29/2000 )

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of Punjab National Bank , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

[No. L- 12012/20/2000 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR Case No. CGIT- 29/2000

Reference No. L - 12012/ 20/ 2000/IR(B- II) Sh. Jagdish Prasad, S/o Sh . Motaram, R/o Leela Chowk, Purani Abadi , Ward No. 11, Through Krishna Dutt Leela

Sri Ganganagar- 335001

Applicant

Versus

RegionalOffice, Meera Chowk,

Regional Manager , Punjab National Bank , Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganagar

Non- applicant PRESENT :

Sh. R.C. Sharma , Presiding Officer.

Forthe applicant : Sh . F. M. Baig .

For the Non-applicant : Sh. Surendra Singh.

Date of award : 29-10-2004

AWARD

1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause ' D' of sub - Sections 1 & 2(A) to Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ' Act ' ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under :-

"Whether the action of the Management of Punajb National Bank, Regional Office , Sri Ganganagar in dismissing the services of Shri Jagdish Prasad S/o Shri Motaram, Peon in violation of principles of natural justice was justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled and from what date ?" 2. The workman in his statement of claim has averred that he was appointed to the post of 4th Class on 17-10-79 by the non - applicant bank, who was dismissed from the service on 25-11-87 and that the charges levelled 10053 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

workman has caused the delay of 10 years in raising the dispute.

against him were baseless . He has further stated that the charge of the embezzlement worth Rs . 600 levelled against him did not relate to his service conduct, but it was a personal transaction, which is not sustainable.

3. The non- applicant , in his written statement has disputed the claim of the workman and has pleaded that the workman has raised the dispute after a lapse of 7years , that the punishment of the dismissal was inflicted on the workman by the disciplinary authority vide its order dated 25-11-87, the appeal thereof was also failed and that a chargesheet dated 4-4-87 was served upon him alleging the acts of gross misconduct committed by him under the provisions of the bipartite settlement . It has been further pointed out that the workman had obtained the money from one Sh. Pappu S/o Sh. Mohan Singh, the holder of the Savings Account No. 1104 on times under the pretext that he would deposit the same into his account, but he embezzled the amount worth Rs . 600 and fictitious entries were entered into his savings account by him.

4. In the rejoinder, the workman has reiterated the facts as stated in the statement of claim .

5. After hearing both the parties on the preliminary issue of the fairness of domestic enquiry, this Court vide its order dated 9-9-2002 came to a conclusion that the domestic enquiry conducted against him was in violation of the principles of natural justice and it was held to be unfair.

6. The Management was permitted to lead the evidence to justify the charges levelled against the workman. In support of its case, the affidavits of MW- 1 , Sh . Balkrishna, the Bank Officer and MW- 2, Sh. D.S. Khemsara, Officer In -charge of the branch, have been placed on the record on behalf of the Management, who were cross -examined on behalf of the workman . The workman has filed his affidavit , who was cross -examined onbehalf of the non - applicant .

9. Per contra, the ld. representative for the workman submits that the workman was terminated on 25-11-87, who preferred an appeal against the termination order which was rejected on 25-6-88 and thereafter he raised an industrial dispute on 28-4-98 . It was contended on behalf ofthe workman that the application Ex. M- 7 , which is alleged to have been filed by Pappu , has not beenproved by the management witnesses and the best evidence in this regard was that of Pappu who could not be examined by the Management . The submission of the ld. representative is that it was a personal dealing between Pappu and the workman for which the workman cannot be held guilty and that the alleged transaction had taken place before the management witnesses . The id. representative has also assailed the testimony of management witnesses MW - 1 , Sh. Balakrishan and MW- 2, Sh . D. S. Khemsara on the ground that their evidence is feeble and unreliable . The next contention canvassed onbehalfofthe workman is that in his reply to the show- cause notice Ex: M - 7 , the workman had clearly narrated that incident as a personal dealing with Pappu and that though the entries in the the passbook were made by the workman yet he had not issued the fake counter slips to Pappu , which shows that he had not an intention to embezzle the money. The workman in his evidence, as per the submission made by the Id. representative, could not be shaken on behalf of the Management and it is not proved that the embezzlement was committed by him . The Id. representative has also challenged that the charges framed by the Management under para 19.5 (d) and (j ) of the bipartite settlement are not made out on the grounds thatunder clause 19.5 ( d) , no willful damage was caused to the barik nor under clause 19.5 (j ) , no loss to the bank was caused and no forgery in bank account books was committed . In support of his contention , the ld. representative has drawn my attention towards 1994(1 ) WLC (Rajasthan) 679 .

7. 1 have heard both the parties and have scanned the record.

10. I have bestowed my thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions and have carefully gone through the judicial pronouncements referred to before me .

11. Ex . M- 3 is an application which is stated to have been submitted by-one Sh . Pappu before the Branch Manager wherein he has stated that he got opened a savings account no . 1104 in the bank through its employee Sh. Jagdish Prasad Samaria and when he came to bank for withdrawing his money, he came to know that only Rs . 111 have been deposited in his account whereas his passbook contain the entries of Rs . 711. Hence, he requested that the remaining money may be refunded to him. In his reply Ex. M-7 to the show-cause notice, the workman has stated that the complaint filed against him by Sh . Pappu is false . In his reply Ex. M- 24 to the 8. Theld . representative for the Management contends that Sh . Pappu had filed a complaint Ex . М- 3 before the bank which has been proved by both the management witnesses and the workman in reply to the chargesheet Ex . M - 24 has admitted his guilt. The submission of the Id . representative is that admission is the best evidence and even on account of the admission, there was no necessity to hold the enquiry against the workman . In support of his contention, the ld. representastive has placed his reliance upon 2000 (4) WLC Rajasthan 106. His next contention is that the bank has also exhibited the passbook of the account holder Sh. Pappu wherein the workman had entered the fake entries of depositing the amount on his behalf. The fast submission on behalf of the Management is that the 10054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926 [PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ] chargesheet , the workman has narrated that account no. 1104 in favour of Sh . Pappu was got opened through his attempts and Pappu used to hand over him the money to deposit in his bank account , but on account of the illness of his son he could not deposit the amount in Pappu's bank account . He has also admitted that he had entered into the passbook the entries of the said amount given by Pappu to him but it could not be deposited in the bank account . These are the material documents for the adjudication of the controversy.

14. Contrary to it, the ld. representative for the workman has referred to 1999 ( 1 ) WLC ( Rajasthan ) 679 wherein it has been observed by the Hon'ble Court that persons for whom relief is sought must appear to make it known that they are claiming such relief. On this proposition, theld. representative for the workman has sought to argue that Pappu was a material witness who had filed the complaint Ex. M- 3 against the workman and it could not be proved on account of his non- examination in the evidence by the management .

15. The facts of the referred to case are that the writ petition was based on newspaper reportings and the Hon'ble Court has observed that it would merely amount to an anonymous statement and cannot be treated as the proof of the facts stated in the newspaper and such statement is inadmissible in the absence of the maker of the statement deposing to have perceived the facts reported . But contrary to it, in the case at hand the management witness Balkishan has clearly stated that the application Ex . M - 3 was submitted before him by Pappu himself and he had made an endorsement to it, which is proved from the record . Apart it, the workman -delinquent himself has clearly admitted his guilt in his reply Ex. M- 24 to the chargesheet . Thus , the referred to decision does not help the submission made on behalf of the workman.

16. It is also pertinent to state here that the workman was terminated on 25-11-87 , whose departmental appeal was rejected on 25-6-88 and after a lapse of 10 years, he has raised this industrial dispute and no reasonable explanation could be offered on his behalf for raising the dispute at a belated stage .

12. It is true that Pappu could not be examined by the Management to prove the application Ex. M -3 . But the Management witness Balkrishna in his affidavit has clearly stated that Pappu had submitted this application before him . Although he could not be able to point out that whether Pappu had put his thumb impression on the application before him and whether he had placed the deposit receipts before him or not . He has also denied that he had not enquired into the matter as to why Pappu was giving the money to the delinquent at his shop . But on these facts alone his testimony cannot be discarded and further the facts are not enough to disbelieve the facts narrated in the reply Ex. M- 24 by the workman. The workman himself in his cross - examination has admitted that he had filed a reply to the chargesheet dated 4-4-87 which is Ex . M - 24 and it contains his signature from A- B. He has further admitted that he had received the money from the bank customer Sh . Pappu and had entered into the entries thereof in his passbook , but his statement is that it was his personal transaction with Pappu and that Pappu had not given him the money to deposit in his bank account . But the later part of his statement that it was a personal dealing with Pappu , who had not given him the money to deposit in the bank account , has not been corroborated by his reply Ex . M- 24 wherein he has in clear terms admitted that Pappu used to give the money to him to deposit in his bank account as the branch was situated at a far off place . Thus Ex. M - 24 is a clear admission of his guilt by the workman himself, which establishes that he had embezzled the amount worth Rs . 600 , which he received from the account holder Sh . Pappu for depositing in his bank account .

17. On the basis of aforesaid analysis of the evidence , the management has succeeded to establish the guilt of the workman under clause 19.5 (j ) of the bipartite settlement which defines the gross misconduct as doing any act prejudicial to the interest of the bank or gross negligence or negligence involving or likely to involve the bank in serious loss . The workman had obtained the money from Pappu , an account holder in the non - applicant bank , to deposit it in his bank account but had not deliberately deposited it , whose act was prejudicial to the interest of the bank and caused a loss to it and has thus committed the gross misconduct under the aforesaid provision of the bipartite settlement.

18. Now , I advert to the question of the proportionate punishment as to whether the punishment imposed on the workman is disproportionate to his guilt .

13. In 2000 (4) WLC Rajasthan 106 , the Hon'ble Court has followed the principle propounded in AIR 1972 SC 32 wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that "When the delinquent admits the facts , he is guilty and his plea amounts to a plea of guilt " . The Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has further held that even in the cases where the workman has admitted the guilt of embezzlement , holding of an enquiry for removal of the workman was not warranted . Thus , the contention advanced on behalf of the management in this context is fortified by the decision supra and the statement made by the workman in his reply Ex . M - 24 clearly amounts as an admission of his guilt.

19. Theld. representative for the workman has urged that the alleged transaction had not taken place in the bank premise , that no forgery was committed by the workman as the entries were made by him in presence of Pappu at his shop and that his money was also not misused. Therefore, under these circumstances, the ld . representative 10055 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 contends that the penalty is excessive. It has been opposed onbehalf of the bank by advancing the submission that in the banking business , integrity and honesty are required to be observed by every bank employee which has not been followed by the workman. The Id. representative for the bank has drawn my attention towards the observation made Hon'ble High Court in 2000 (4) WLC (Rajasthan) 106 wherein the Hon'ble Court has held as below :-

S.O. 3247.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputs Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. 92/2002 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of Indian Overseas Bank, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

[No. L- 12012/ 101/2002 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Tuesday, the 14th September, 2004

PRESENT :

K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 92/2002 "Thus , in view of the above , once the Labour Court has recorded the findings of facts that the workman had admitted his guilt in an inquiry held against him and had also agreed to make to deposit and when he failed to make the deposit, an F.I.R. was lodged, I fail to understand, in view of the law as referred to above , how it could have been held that though the termination was justified but it could not have been made without holding the full -fledged inquiry on the charges . This , in the facts and circumstances of this case, holding an inquiry for removal of the workman was not warranted as the workman had admitted the guilt of embezzlement. More so, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Committee , Bahadurgarh Vs. Krishanan Bihari , AIR 1996 SC 1249, no punishment other than removal could have beenimposed."

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Indian Overseas Bank and their workman)

BETWEEN

: I Party/Petitioner

Sri S. Kannayiram

20. Looking to the gravity of the misconduct ofthe workman in the light of the decision supra, the interference in the punishment of dismissal is not warranted and his dismissal order appears to be justified.

AND

: II Party/Management

The Regional Manager, IndianOverseas Bank, Regional Office, Madurai

Appearance:

21. For the foregoing reasons , the reference is answered in the negative against the workman and in favour of the non - applicant bank and it is held that the action of the non -applicant bank in dismissing the service ofthe workman is legal and justified and the claim ofthe workman is rejected. An award is passed in these terms accordingly.

For the Workman

: M/ s . S. Ravi & D. Anni Besant, Advocates

22. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17 ( 1 ) of the Act.

For the Management

R. C. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2004

: M/ s . N.G.R. Prasad & W.T. Prabhakar, Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L- 12012/ 101 /2002 - IR (B - II) dated 24-09-2002 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

का. आ. 3246. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 92/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

"Whether the discontinuance of service of Shri S. Kannayiram as a thrift deposit collector by the Indian Overseas Bank is legal and justified ? If not, what relief is the disputant entitled to ?" [सं. एल . 12012/101/2002- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव 10056

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004 /AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

2. After the receipt of the reference, it was taken onfile as I.D. No. 92/2002 and notices were issued to both the parties andboth the parties entered appearance through their advocates and fill their claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:-

theBranch Manager reported to Regional Office , Madurai that the thrift deposit collector was not remitting the amounts collected by him on the following days as per guidelines . The Petitioner was orally counselled by Branch Manager to remit the amount collected by him in time. But the Petitioner failed to comply with the same in spite ofrepeated oral advice . During the month of August, 1998 the Petitioner failed to remit the deposit collection on 11 , 14, 15 , 18 , 20, 21 , 24, 26, 27 , 28 , 29 & 31 ( 13 days ) without informing the bank. Therefore, the Respondent/ Bank has sent letters to Thrift deposit holders on 9-9-98 to confirm the balances . Some of the depositors namely Mr. A.Muniyandi and Mr. N.S. Rajendran has complained about the Petitioner with regard to shortfall of remittance . Though the Petitioner was informed about the same , he has given evasive reply. Thus , the Petitioner failed to do the job entrusted to him and caused delay in remittance ofdeposit collection into the branch at his own will and pleasure and non- submission of weekly statements . Since he is not an employee of the bank , there is no need for issuing any charge sheet alleged by him and Section 25F ofthe Act is not applicable to the Petitioner. The Petitioner was disengaged due to his own act and there is no mala fide on the part of the Respondent/Bank . Hence , the Respondent prays that the claim is to be dismissed with costs.

5. In these circumstances , the points for my consideration are

( i) " Whether the discontinuance of service of Shri S. Kannayiram as a thrift deposit collector by the II Party/Management is legal and justified ?"

(ii ) " To what relief, the Petitioner is entitled ? "

Point No. 1 :

The Petitioner was originally appointed as daily deposit collecting agent in South Masi Street branch of the then Bank of Tamil Nadu Ltd. by an order dated 27-3-84. The Bank of Tamil Nadu was merged with the II Party/Management namely Indian Overseas Bank herein and the entire establishment of Bank of Tamil Nadu was taken over by the II Party/ Management with all its assets and liabilities . The Petitioner who was working in Bank ofTamil Nadu also continued to work without any break in service with the II Party/Management as Thrift Deposit Collector. But all of a sudden from April , 1998 , he was not paid commission but he was paid Rs. 5000 during November , 1998. Thereafter , the Petitioner was not allowed to ontinue as Thrift Deposit Collector . Subsequently, in February, 1999 the Petitioner was allowed to collect the deposit and he collected the same upto July, 1999. But even though he has approached the II Party/ Management to allow him to do collection work, he was not permitted to do so. Subsequently, on 28-8-2000 the Petitioner has sent a lawyer's notice to the Respondent for which the Respondent has sent a reply on 28-12-2000 by furnishing incorrect particulars and stated that the service of the Petitioner was not satisfactory . But , however, the II Party/Management did not issue any charge memo nor any explanation was ever called for from the Petitioner. The non -employment of the Petitioner is sudden, summary and in violation of principles of natural justice. Further, they have not followed the provisions of Section 25F of the Act . It is false to allege that the Petitioner has not deposited 13 days of collection amount, on the other hand II Party /Management refused to receive the same and the said amounts were returned to the respective depositors with due acknowledgement . The allegations levelled against the Petitioner is motivated and victimising in character. Without even conducting an enquiry for the allegations advanced by the Il Party/ Management, the Respondent has terminated the services of the Petitioner and therefore , the Petitioner prays for reinstatement with back wages, continuity of service and other attendant benefits .

4. But as against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that no doubt the Petitioner was engaged as Thrift Deposit Collector since 1984at South Masi Street branch at Madurai . The duty entrusted with the Petitioner is to collect daily deposits from the customers who open a thrift deposit account and to remit the collections at the next day at the branch . In the year 1998 ,

6. In this case, the admitted facts are that the Petitioner joined as Thrift Deposit Collector of the South Masi Street branch of the Bank of Tamil Nadu Ltd. on 27-03-1984. From April, 1998 he has not been permitted to collect the thrift deposits from the depositors . On behalf ofthe Petitioner , it was contended that the termination of service of the Petitioner is a naked violation of all accepted principles of natural justice and against all labour laws and legislations and he has not been given any opportunity to deny the allegations made against him and no enquiry was conductedby the Respondent/Management and abruptly he was terminated from service without any rhyme or reason and therefore, it is not valid in law. Further, it is contended that the Petitioner has sent number ofletters and representations to the higher authorities of the bank to interfere in the termination order issued by the bank Branch Manager with mala fide intention . Even after that, they have not considered and therefore , since no enquiry was conducted against the Petitioner and no opportunity was given to repudiate the contention of the 10057 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18 , 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Respondent/Bank , the termination is not valid in law and therefore, the Petitioner is to be reinstated in service.

Standing Orders , if applicable and principles of natural justice . The enquiry should not be an empty formality. When a proper enquiry has been held by an employer, and finding of misconduct is plausible conclusion flowing from the evidence adduced at the enquiry, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to sit judgement over the decision of the employer as an appellate body. Interference with the decision of the employer will be justified only when the findings arrived at in the enquiry are perverse or the Management is guilty of victimisation and unfair labour practice or mala fide . Even if no enquiry is held by the employer or if the enquiry held by him is found to be defective, the Tribunal in order to satisfy itself about the legality and validity of the order had to give an opportunity to the employer and employee to adduce evidence before it and it is open to employer to adduce evidence for first time justifying his action and it is open to the employee to adduce evidence contra." In this case, the Respondent/ Management has examined one Mr. N. Valliappan , who was working as Department Officer in South Masi Street Branch at Madurai at the relevant period and the Respondent also produced documents Ex . M1 to M23 to prove their contention . The Manager who was examined on the side of the Respondent , namely MW1 , has stated that in spite of stipulations , the Petitioner on several occasions , did not deposit the collections on the such following day, resorted to non -genuine and false entries, abstained from making collections without informing and without making alternate arrangements and by doing so , he retained the amount collected from the depositors during the previous days/ week at his disposal and accounted in the books of the bank after the next day and on some occasions after more than a week from the date of collection and he further contended that he continued to commit such irregularities which are evident from documents filed by Respondent/Management.

8. Though , on behalf of the Petitioner it is contended that this Manager has got personal enmity with regard to cash consideration against the Petitioner, on behalf of the Petitioner nothing relevant produced before this Tribunal to attribute the motive to this witness . Further, from Ex . M4 to M16 & M17 after it was brought to the notice of the Petitioner , and by his letter dated 6-2-99 , the Petitioner by a written explanation admitted his mistake and further admitted that he has settled the amount with the depositors . Therefore , it is clear that the Petitioner has made some non -genuine entries and therefore, he was warned by the Respondent/Management . Similarly, the collection during the month of August , 1998 the Petitioner has not deposited the collection amount of 13 days . Thus , he has not paid the collections into the bank regularly or paid the amounts belatedly, which act would shatter the trust of the depositors in the bank and hence for all these reasons , after consideration, the Management has taken a decision to terminate the services 7. As against this , on behalf of the Respondent it is contended that the thrift deposit collectors are not regular employees of the bank , though they are workmen within the meaning of term as defined under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , therefore , there is no question of absorption and the deposit collectors being paid on same scales and allowances and other service conditions of the regular employees of the bank, they cannot claim normal privileges and rights which are available to regular employees of the bank and the terms of engagement would continue as per agreement entered into by the thrift deposit collectors . The Petitioner in this case on several occasions , did not deposit the collections on the following day, resorted to non -genuine and false entries , abstained from making collections without informing and without making alternate arrangements and by doing so , he retained the amount collected from the depositors during the previous days /week at his disposal and accounted in the books of the bank after the next day and on some occasions after more than a week from the date of collection and in spite of sufficient warnings against the repetitions of such lapses , he continued to commit such irregularities . Some instances of belated remittances , short remittances , resorting to non - genuine and false entries and abstaining from collections without informing and without making alternate arrangements are continuous in nature and therefore , the bank has terminated the services of the Petitioner and in such case, it cannot be contended that the termination is void or not valid in law. Learned counsel for the Respondent further argued that even assuming for argument sake that no enquiry was conducted by the Respondent/Management, in number of decisions, the Supreme Court has held that even if no enquiry is held by employer or enquiry held by him is found to be defective, the Tribunal in order to satisfy itself about the legality and validity of the order had to give an opportunity to the employer/employee to adduce evidence before it. It is open to employer to adduce evidence for first time justifying his action and it is open to the employee to adduce evidence contra and therefore , even for argument sake , the Respondent/Management has not given an opportunity to the Petitioner in this case , before this Tribunal , the Respondent/Management has produced number of documents to show the lapses on the part of the Petitioner and therefore , it cannot be said only due to non-enquiry or defective enquiry , the termination is not valid in law and he relied on the rulings reported in AIR 1973 SC 1227 Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India P. Ltd. & Others Vs. Management and Others . In that case, the Supreme Court of India after going through the judgements of various Courts had observed that "before imposing punishment , an employer is expected to conduct a proper enquiry in accordance with the provisions of

3606GI/ 04-59 10058

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYANA 27 , 1926

ofthe Petitioner and he has also produced a letter written by the Petitioner to the Manager, in which the Petitioner has given a reply that his letter was written on the instructions of the Manager and the contents of the letter are not truе .

9. But, I find there is no substance in the contention ofthe Petitioner because the contents of the letter clearly prove that he has committed some lapses with regard to the collection and belated accounting and deposits into the bank , which were proved by the Management by producing number of documents . Under such circumstances , it is only to wriggle out the situation, the Petitioner has taken the stand that the letter was written by the Petitioner on the instructions of the Manager.

10. The learned counsel for the Petitioner all along contended that it is only due to vengeance and personal enmity, the Manager has taken the stand and made a false complaint to the Regional Office and after a long lapse of time the Regional Office has terminated the service ofthe Petitioner without any enquiry and without any valid reason or rhythm . Further, he contended that even before his termination he has made several representations to the higher officials of the Respondent/Bank that enquiry should be conducted with regard to the complaints made, but for the reasons best known to them , they have not made any enquiry and they have come to a wrong conclusion on the advise of the Manager and therefore , it is not valid in law.

11. But , here again, I find there is no force in the contention ofthe learned counsel for the Petitioner because from the documents produced before this Court , it is clear that on number of occasions , the Petitioner was not regular in collecting deposits and further he was belatedly accounting the deposits and in some times he has gone on leave without informing the bank. Under such circumstances , it is futile to contend that the Manager of the Respondent/Bank has given a false complaint against the Petitioner on personal enmity. Further, even though the Petitioner has alleged that he has got personal enmity, hehas not produced even a single document to show that the Manager has got some personal enmity with the Petitioner.

12. Again , the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that oral order that too, without any enquiry is void ab initio and the allegation that sometimes he has made deposits belatedly and it resorted to non - genuine and false entries in the cards given to the bank and to the customer , it can be rectified at the end of the month because only at that time both the accounts ( i.c. givento the bank

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] and also given to customer) have to be checked by the Manager of the bank and the Petitioner as a thrift deposit collector has to tally with the accounts maintained by the bank and also the cards given to the customers . There may be some minor mistakes due to totalling of amounts and also due to entries in the accounts , but that cannotbe taken as a serious note because the Petitioner has every opportunity to rectify the mistakes and on that ground a major punishment cannot be given to the Petitioner. Though, I find some force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the irregular manner in which the Petitioner has acted and belated accounting of the deposits would definitely shatter the trust of the depositors in the bank, Under such circumstances , I find though it is contended that no opportunity was given and no enquiry was conductedby the management against the Petitioner , as per the judgement reported in AIR 1973 SC 1227 , I find the management has proved the guilt ofthe Petitioner before this Tribunal and it was satisfactorily proved before this Tribunal that the Petitioner's lapses had made him to suffer with the punishment imposed by the Respondent/ Management .

13. The learned counsel for the Petitioner again argued that the Supreme Court while dealing with the issue of Deposit Collectors of the Bank has held that " we also see no force in the contention that Section 10 of Banking Regulations Act prevents employment of persons on Commission basis. The proviso to Section 10 makes it clear that Commission canbe paid to persons who are not in regular employment . Undoubtedly, deposit collectors are regular employees of the bank and there is clear relationship of master and servant between them and the Respondent/Bank. " In such circumstances , since the Petitioner is a thrift deposit collector and the relationship between the Respondent and the Petitioner is of master and servant and in such circumstances, without any proper enquiry and without giving any opportunity to deny the allegations made against him, the Petitioner was dismissed from service and therefore , it is not valid in law.

14. As I have already stated that the Respondent has proved before this Tribunal through evidence of MW1 and through the documents produced before this Tribunal to the effect that the Petitioner has got lapses on his part which made the Respondent to take severe action against the Petitioner and under such circumstances . I find there is novalid contention made by the Petitioner and hence, I find this point in favour of the Respondent/Management .

Point No. 2 :

The next pointto be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

10059 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

M7 Nil

15. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief as claimed by him.

Xerox copy of the relevant page of bank account in respect of Sri N. S.Rajendran

16. The reference is answered accordingly.

Nil

Xerox copy of the complaint letter of Mr. K. Bhuhari to Respondent Regarding shortage in his account (Dictated to the P. A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 14th September, 2004) .

20-07-98

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Xerox copy of the complaint letter of Mr. Amaran to Respondent Regarding shortage in his account Witnesses Examined :

M10 Nil

Xerox copy of the account particulars of Mr. Bhuhari For the I Party/Workman WW1 Sri S. Kannayiram

M11 Nil

For the II Party/Management : MW1 Sri N. Valliappan

Xerox copy of the account particulars of. Mr. Amaran Documents Marked :

06-02-99

M12

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Respondent/Bank Forthe I Party/Workman:

09-03-99

M13

Date

Ex. No.

Description

Nil

Xerox copy of the complaint letter of Mr. M. Mahalingam to Respondent Regarding shortage in hisaccount

Xerox copy of the 2A petition filed by Petitioner before Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central )

M14 Nil

27-07-01

Xerox copy of the account particulars ofMr. Mahalingam

M15 Nil

Xerox copy ofthe thrift deposit pass book details

Xerox copy of the written comments filed by Respondent Before Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)

M16 Nil

For the II Party/Management :

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Respondent/Bank Ex . No. Date

Description

M17 Nil

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Respondent/Bank 06-02-99

M18 06-06-98

Signature of the Petitioner in his letter to the Senior Manager of Respondent/Bank

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Respondent/Bank Nil

M19(3) Nil

Xerox copy of the Thrift Deposit Scheme

Xerox copy of the letters from Petitioner to Respondent/Bank 21-09-98

23-02-98

M20

Xerox copy of the internal correspondence

Xerox copy of the internal correspondence.

15-06-99

12-10-98

M21

Xerox copy ofthe complaint given by Mr. Muniyandi to Respondent

Xerox copy ofthe letter from Senior Manager of Respondent bank to Petitioner

12-10-98

09-08-99

M22

Xerox copy of the internal correspondence

Xerox copy of the complaint given by Mr. N.S. Rajendran against Petitioner to Respondent/Bank

21-06-99

M23

Nil

Xerox copy of the internal correspondence.

Xerox copy of the relevant page of bank account of Sri A. Muniyandi

3606 G1 /04-60 10060 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

of the I. D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 12011 /233 /2003 -IR(B - II) , dated, the 8th March, 2004.

SCHEDULE

का. आ. 3247.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं०-2, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/ 2004) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 कोप्राप्त हुआ था।

"Whether the action of the Management of Bank ofIndia in not accepting the Pension option in lieu of Contributory Provident Fund of Shri Shyamal Kumar Mitra, Cash-cum- Accounts Clerk of Bank's Putki Branch is justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?"

[सं . एल . 12011 /233/2003- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 29th November, 2004

S.O. 3247.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.33 / 2004) of the Central Government Industrial- cum- Labour Court, Dhanbad No. 2 as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004 .

2. In course of hearing of the instant reference the representative of the workman by filing a petition submitted before this Tribunal to pass a 'No dispute' Award in this case as the dispute in question has already been settled between the parties . None appeared on behalf of the management . Since the workman/union is not interested to proceed with the hearing the case , there is no reason to drag on the same . Accordingly the reference case is closed and a ' No dispute ' Award is rendered in this case presuming non -existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

[No. L - 12011/233 /2003 - IR(B -II )] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवंबर, 2004

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. Biswas, Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I. D. Act , 1947

REFERENCE NO . 33 OF 2004

का. आ. 3248.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार या बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 323/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the Management of Bank of India and their workmen .

[सं. एल. 12011/214/2003- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव APPEARANCES :

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2004 Onbehalf of the workman Mr. Saket Kumar Sinha , Zonal Secretary, Bank of India Employees Association .

On behalf of the employers : None .

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Banking

Dated, Dhanbad , the 4th November , 2004

S.O. 3248.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.323/ 2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Vijaya Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

AWARD

The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d)

[No. L- 12011/214/ 2003 - IR(B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

10061 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[ भोग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Tuesday, the 28th September, 2004

PRESENT :

K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 323/2004

[Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Vijaya Bank and their workman]

BETWEEN :

: I Party/Claimant

The Joint Secretary,

Vijaya Bank Workers

Organisation

AND

The Deputy General Manager, : II Party/ Management Vijaya Bank, Chennai

Appearance :

For the Claimant : S / Sri R. Vijaya Kumar

& S. D. Srinivasan, Authorised Representatives.

For the Management : Smt. R. Shakeela, Authorised Representative.

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide NotificationOrder No. L- 12011 /214/2003 - IR(B - II) dated 08-03-2004 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Vijaya Bank in failing to fill up the vacancy of full -time sweeper in their Regional Office at Chennai and filling up the same by outsourcing is justified or not ? If not justified, what relief they are entitled to ?"

2.After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I. D. No. 323/2004 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their Authorised Representatives and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:

up the vacancy of full - time sweeper at its Regional Office in Chennai and outsourcing the said work hitherto done by the permanent full time sweepers in total violation of the settlement dated 30-12-98 entered into between the Petitioner union and the Respondent/Bank. During the year 1999, the Respondent/Bank had identified one post of full time sweeper , changed as Regional Office subsequently, for the post of full time sweeper at the erstwhile Zonal Office and also one post of full time sweeper at Moore Street branch respectively in the Chennai Region, Pursuant to that identification, Smt. R. Govindammal who was working as part -time sweeper was posted to Regional Office , Chennai as full time sweeper as per the above settlement. Subsequently, the said Smt . Govindmmal was transferred to Moor Street branch to work as full time sweeper in the vacancy of Smt . Saratha , who had retired on superannuation . Therefore, the vacancy of full time sweeper was created in Regional Office , Chennai . Therefore , the Respondent/ Bank ought to have filled up the vacancy as per the rules and procedures by initiating selection process of the scale wages ofpermanent part -time sweeper in the subordinate staff cadre . But in utter violation of the above said settlement had outsourced the cleaning or sweeping work! hitherto performed by the permanent part -time sweeper and full -time sweeper of the bank. The Petitioner Union has sent a letter to the then Deputy General Manager, Regional Office and since they have not given any reply, the Petitioner Union has raised the dispute before Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , The action of the Respondent/Bank in failing to fill up the vacancy of full time sweeper and outsourcing the same is unlawful , unreasonable and unjustified and it has resulted in violation of the Govt . guidelines. Further , the Respondent's action is also not permissible under law. By outsourcing the said work, the Respondent/Bank abolished the regular nature of work being done by the permanent employees of the Respondent/Bank , which is unfair labour practice. The Respondent's manner of appointment of contractors substituting the permanent and perennial nature of job will amount to change in service conditions causing serious prejudice to the concerned employees . Further, it has resulted in serious prejudice to several of the permanent employees in part -time sweeper cadre, who are eligible and willing senior- most part -time sweeper in 3/4 scale wages would have become full - time sweeper . Therefore , the action of the Respondent is not only arbitrary but also illegal and it would frustrate the provisions of settlement envisaged by the Industrial Disputes Act . The non- implementation of provisions of settlement has given rise to denial of legitimate opportunities as would be otherwise available to the permanent part-time sweepers. Therefore, the Petitioner Union prays that the action of the Respondent/Bank is unjustified and impermissible in law and hence to pass an award to that effect with costs.

This dispute relates to wrongful and unlawful action ofthe management of the Respondent/Bank in not filling 10062 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 2004/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1926 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

14-11-2002 pertaining the branches/offices to outsource the cleaningjob in order to ensure the bank premises clean andproperly maintained . Therefore, there is no prohibition or legal impediment in outsourcing the cleaning job. Clause 13 mentions about commencement ofdeclaration of vacancies and declaration of vacancies left to the descretion ofBoard of Directors of the bank. Hence , for all these reasons the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

5. In these circumstances , the points for my consideration are :

(i) "Whether the action of the Respondent/bank in failing to fill up the vacancy of full time sweeper in their Regional Office at Chennai and filled up the same by outsourcing is justified or not ?"

(ii) " If not justified, to what relief, the Petitioner Union is entitled ?"

Point No. 1

6. The main point to be decided in this case is whether the action of the Respondent/Management in failing to fill up the full time sweeper vacancy at Regional Office, Chennai and doing the job by an outsider is in violation of subsisting settlement dated 30-12-98 or not .

7. On behalf of the Petitioner Union, it is contended that there is one identified post of full time sweeper in Regional Office , Chennai and pursuant to the identification of the post of full time sweeper, Smt. R. Govindammal , who was working as part - time sweeper at Saidapet branch was posted to Regional Office, Chennai as full time sweeper . When she was working there as full time sweeper , she was again transferred to Moore Street branch on 31-03-2003. As per the subsisting settlement between the Petitioner Union and the Respondent/ Management dated 30-12-98 , clause 13 says-

"Declaration ofvacancies :-'Vacancy of full time sweeper posts and that of peons indicating branch/ office will be intimated to the union before the end offinancial year concerned and the process of filling up of the such posts will be completed within six months from the date of declaration of the vacancies ."

4. As against this , the Respondent/Management in its Counter Statement contended that this Respondent has not violated the terms of settlement dated 30-12-98 . Previously, the Respondent/Bank has four tier system of administrative set up namely branches , Divisional Office, ZonalOffice and Head Office. It was changed during 1999 and the four tier system was converted into three tier system namely Branches , Regional Office and Head Office. Therefore, it is false to contend that the Zonal Offices were changed as Regional Office . On transfer of Smt . R. Govindammal to Moor Street branch to work as full time sweeper, a vacancy of full time sweeper arose in Regional Office , Chennai on account of the transfer effected. No doubt, the Respondent/Bank entered into a settlement with the Petitioner Union . A similar settlement was entered into with the VBEA and as per clause 1.1 (b) of the settlement , the number of vacancies for the post of full time subordinate cadre will be as decided by the Respondent at its discretion with due regard to its needs . Further, such vacancies as decided by the Board of Directors of the bank will be notified by the Respondent before the end of financial year concerned . Any vacancy arising out of wastages i.e. death , resignation , voluntary retirement , retirement on superannuation , dismissal , discharge and termination of service for whatsoever the reason , and / or creation of new post , if any, by the Respondent at its discretion as and when required by the Respondent will be filled up through enhanceinent of scale wages as and when vacancy arises/ created . In this case, the appropriate Govt . has not issued any notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act , 1970 prohibiting employment of contract labour. Further, apart from this awards and settlements governing the service conditions of the employees of the Respondent do not impose any prohibition in engaging subordinate staff category of employees through an agency. Neither awards and settlements governing the service conditions of the award staff members in the Respondent nor the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act , 1970 contain any provision prohibiting the engagement oftemporary employees through an agency. The circulars of the Respondent/Bank are for internal guidelines , the breach of which will not give rise to any cause of action . In this case , though the bank employed certain persons from outside , the arrangement was made only as an interim arrangement till the filling up of the post . Therefore , it cannot be said that it is in violaion of settlement or Sastry Award. It cannot be said as unfair labour practice . The settlement dated 30-12-98 does not cover the vacancies arising out of transfer of a particular employee . Therefore, the action of the Respondent is neither arbitrary nor illegal . On account of engaging temporary employees , the Respondent/Bank had not retranched any of the part -time sweeper. Further, it will not cause any prejudice to existing cadre of permanent part - time sweepers . Further, the Respondent/Bank has issued circular No. 141/2002 dated

In violation of this rule , the Respondent/Bank has not filled up the post of full time sweeper in Regional Office, Chennai. On the other hand, the bank has engaged a third party to do the sweeping and also housekeeping work which is in violation of the said settlement and it was contended on behalf of the Petitioner that this vacancy is to be filled up through enhancement of scale wages as per clause 1.0(b) and clause 1.1 (b) of the Memorandum of Settlement by initiating the selection process for enhancement in scale wages of permanent part-time sweeper in subordinate staff cadre. But without doing this 10063 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27, 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

process, the bank in utter violation of the said settlement had outsourced for cleaning /sweeping namely housekeeping work to an outside agency. It is the further contention ofthe Petitioner that hiring outside agents and contractors for cleaning jobs at the Respondent/Bank is impermissible in law since the Respondent has signed Memorandum of Settlement with the Petitioner Union.

8. But, as against this , on behalfofthe Respondent it is contended that neither awards nor settlements governing the service conditions of the award staff members in the Respondent bank contain any provision prohibiting the engagement of temporary employees through an agency. No doubt, the Respondent/Bank has employed an outside agency for cleaning the Regional Officebut the said arrangement was made only an interim arrangement till the filling up the post through the process mentioned in the settlement as the selection process may take time to fill up the post and therefore , the bank has not violated the settlement as alleged by the Petitioner union. Further , though the Petitioner union alleged that it is in violation of Memorandum of Settlement and also Sastry Award there is no prohibition either in the memorandum of Settlement or in Sastry Award for engaging contract labour. Further, the Supreme Court has also in SAIL's case has quashed the notification issued by the Central Govt. under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 prohibiting the employment of sweepers and cleaners , therefore there is no prohibition or legal embediment in outsourcing for cleaning job . Further, as per the Memorandum of Settlement the process of appointing full time sweeper would commence by declaration of vacancies and declaration of vacancies is left to the discretion of Board ofDirectors of the bank which is evidenced from the similar settlement entered into by the VBEA, the other recognised union of the Respondent/Bank. As per clause 1.1 (b) of the settlement, the number of vacancies for the post of full time subordinate cadre will be as decided by the Respondent at its discretion with due regard to its needs. Therefore , at no stretch of imagination, it can be said that Respondent/Bank has violated the provisions of settlement . It is their further contention that subsequent to the reference, the Respondent/Bank has appointed full time sweeper from among the scale wages employees and therefore, it cannot be said that it has violated the terms ofthe settlement and there is no mala fide or arbitrariness.

It is further argued on behalf of the Petitioner that though it is stated that only after the declaration, six months from the date of declaration , by a circular the vacancy was informed to the Petitioner union and therefore , there is no point in the contention of the Respondent that it was not declared by the Respondent/Bank to the Petitioner Union. Further, the Respondent/Bank is harping on technical grounds to sustain their arguments. The vacancy as and when it arises should be filled up as laid down under Memorandum of Settlement dated 30-12-98 . On behalf of the Petitioner , it was further contended that provisions ofpara 508 of Sastry Award specifically stated that in banking industry, four category of workmen can be employed namely permanent employees , probationers , part-time employees and temporary employees, hence the contention of the bank that para 508 does not prohibit the bank in engaging temporary employees is totally untrue. In case, a contract employee is to be employed in these circumstances , it must have been mentioned in Sastry Award itself. In fact , there has been a clear cut definition of above categories of workmen and also in Bipartite Settlement entered into at the apex level , it has been laid down that these temporary workmen should be given preference in absorption against the permanent vacancies. Therefore , the argued of the Respondent that there is no prohibition is totally wrong. Though, the Respondent/ Bank has relied on rulings in SAIL case , and the said case is not at all relevant to the present dispute . The present dispute is to decide as to whether any violation of the provisions of Memorandum of Settlement entred into between the Respondent/Bank and Petitioner Union was made or not . No doubt , in SAIL case , the Supreme Court has struck down the notification issued by the Government of India in terms of Section 10 of Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act . The said judgement did not give any usurping powers to management to violate any settlement signed under Industrial Dispute Act . Further, the contention of the Respondent that the arrangement made only as an interim arrangement is totally false. Even before the conciliation officer, on the side of the Respondent it was contended that bank has got right in engaging contractors and only in the Counter Statement, they have stated that this engagement of contractor was only an interim arrangement. The action of the Respondent/Bank in not filling the post of full- time sweeper in Regional Office has resulted in violation of guidelines of the Govt. , which clearly stipulates that due weightage should be given for SC/ ST candidates. Further , the non - implementation of provisions of settlement has given rise to denial of legitimate rights , as it violates not only in 3/4th scales wages but also any other lower scales who would have reaped with the benefits ofenhancement in their scale wages due to consequential vacancies in their respective higher scale and therefore , it is clear violation of the Memorandum of Settlement entered into between the Petitioner union and Respondent/ 9. But , again the Authorised Representative ofthe Petitioner Union has contended that even though the Respondent/Bank has now appointed a full - time sweeper atRegional Office , Chennai of the Respondent/Bank, this was done only one year after the vacancy arose and only after raising of this dispute before this Tribunal. Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that as per the terms of settlement, the Respondent/Bank has appointed full- time sweeper within six months from the date ofvacancy.

10064 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926

Bank dated 30-12-98 and therefore , the action of the Respondent is unjustified and impermissible in law.

10. Though I find some force in the contention of the Authorised Representative of the Petitioner Union , it is admitted by both sides that this vacancy of full-time sweeper in Regional Office of the Respondent /Bank has been filled up by promoting³¼ scale wages of an employee to that post and it is the contention of the Respondent/ Bank that engagement of contract employee is only a stop gap arrangement i.e. temporary in nature . The process of appointing full- time sweeper to Regional Office has got some time to fill up the post and in such circumstances , I find , it cannot be said that the Respondent/Bank has violated the terms and conditions of the settlement entered into between the Petitioner Union and Respondent/Bank. I further find that since it is clearly admitted by the Respondent/Bank that arrangement made in Regional Office is only an interim arrangement till the filling up of the post and since the post has now been filled up , I find there is no substance in the contention of the Petitioner Union . As such, I find this point against the petitioner Union.

Point No. 2 :

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relicf the Petitioner is entitled ?

11. Since I find there is no violation of the memorandum of Settlement as alleged by the Petitioner Union and since the failure in filling up the vacancy of full -time sweeper in the Regional Office is justified by the Respondent/management , I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief as claimed by them . No Costs.

12. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 28th Septemeber, 2004. )

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :

On cither side

: None

Documents marked : For the I Party/Claimant

Ex .No. Date Description

WI 27-11-84 Xerox copy of the circular issued by the Respondent/Bank .

W2 18-04-85 Xerox copy of the circular issued by the Respondent/Bank Regarding appointment of part- time sweeper.

W3 31-07-85 Xerox copy of the letter from Head Office of Respondent/Bank Regarding reservation for SC/ ST in appointments .

[PART II-SBC . 3 ( ii) ] W4 27-03-93 Xerox copy of the codified circular for appointment of permanent Part-time sweeper.

W5 20-07-02 Xerox copy of the circular of Head Office ofRespondent/Bank Regarding norms for fixing wages of part-time sweeper.

W6 14-11-02 Хегөx copy of the Head Office circular regarding image projection of bank premises.

W7 30-12-98 Хегox copy of the Memorandum of Settlement between Respondent and VBWO.

W8 31-03-99 Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent /Bank to VBWO regarding Conversion of full -time sweeper as peons .

W9 03-12-02 Xerox copy of the letter from VBWO to Respondent/Management .

W10 07-01-03 Xerox copy of the transfer order of Smt . R. Govindammal .

W11 01-04-03 Xerox copy of the letter from VBWO to Deputy General Manager of Respondent Bank.

W12 Nil

Xerox copy of the relevant page of Chapter XIX of Sastry Award .

W13 Nil

Xerox copy of the relevant page of Chapter XVIII of Bipartite Settlement.

For the II Party /Management : Nil

नई दिल्ली, 30 नवंबर, 2004

का. आ. 3249. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय अरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 53/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 12013/20/1998 - आई. आर. ( बी- II )]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 30th November, 2004

S.O. 3249.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 53/98 ) of the Labour Court , Ernakulam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Indian Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-11-2004.

[No. L- 12013/ 20/ 1998 - IR(B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

10065

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 18, 2004/अग्रहायण 27 , 1926

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM ( IN THE LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM) (Wednesday, the 22nd day of September, 2004) PRESENT :

Shri K.K. Utharan , B.Sc. LL.B. , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 53 OF 1998

(CENTRAL)

BETWEEN

The Zonal Manager, Indian Bank, Zonal Office, Anadhi , Chittoor Road, Pulleppady, Ernakulam , Kochi 682 035 .

AND

The workman of the above concern represented by the General Secretary, Indian Bank Employees Association, Narayana Building, Pazhaya Nadakkavu, Trichur 680001.

Representations:

Sri . Easwar & Mani ,

Advocate, Ernakulam, Kochi -682 035 .

ForManagement Sri . H. B. Shenoy,

Advocate,

Vatsal, 39/187 ,

Krishnaswamy Road , Ernakulam.

ForUnion

AWARD

This reference was made by the Central Government of India as per letter No. L - 12013 /20/98 /IR(B - II) dated 14-12-1998 . The dispute is between the Management of IndianBank and their workman Smt. Isha Joseph Pindis. The dispute referred is :

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank in transferring Smt. Isha Joseph Pindis vide order dated 31-5-97 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the said workman is entitled ? " 2. In response to the notice issued from this court both parties entered appearance and submitted their respective pleadings .

3. When the case stood posted for evidence today the 22nd September, 2004. The counsel for union submitted that the Industrial Dispute is not pressed. Therefore the workman's union is not at all interested to pursue the dispute any further and that no Industrial Dispute is pending to be adjudicated.

In the result, the reference is answered holding that there is no subsisting industrial dispute between the parties to be adjudicated . This award will take effect one month after its publication in the Official Gazette .

Dictated to the confidential Assistant, transcribed and typed out by her, corrected by me and passed this the 22ndday of September, 2004 .

K. K. UTHARAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3250.-केन्द्रीय सरकौर संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ) के उप-खंड (vi ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1389 दिनांक 02-06-2004 द्वारा भारतीय खाद्य निगम, जो कि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि6 में शामिल है , को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 12-06-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है ;

अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ ) के उप - खंड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 12-12-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है । [फा. सं. एस.- 11017/5/91 - आई. आर. ( पी.एल. ) ] जे.पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi , the 6th December, 2004 S.O. 3250.- Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so required that in pursuance of the provisions of sub -clause (vi) of the clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 1389 dated 2-6-2004 the service in the Food Corporation of India which is covered by item 6 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act, for a period of six months from the 12th June, 2004 .

Andwhereas , the Central Government is of opinion thatpublic interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months .

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub -clause (vi ) ofclause (n) of Section 2 10066 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18 , 2004/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 27 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम्बर, 2004

of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 12th December , 2004.

[F. No. S - 11017 / 5 /91 - IR(PL) ]

J.P. PATI , Jt. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 3252.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947(1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ ) के उप- खंड ( vi ) के उपबंधोंके अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1518 दिनांक 15-6-2004 द्वारा ईंधन गैसों (कोयला गैस , प्राकृतिक गैस और ऐसी अन्य ) के प्रसंस्करण एवं उत्पादन में लगे उद्यद्योग में सेवाओं को जोकि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 29 में शामिल हैं, को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 15-6-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

का. आ. 3251.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ) के उप- खंड ( vi ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1471 दिनांक 11-6-2004 द्वारा लोह अयस्क खनन उद्योग जो कि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 16 में शामिल हैं , को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 18-6-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( द ) के उप- खंड (vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 15-12-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[फा. सं. एस. - 11017/2/2003-आई. आर. (पी.एल. ) ]

जे.पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ ) के उप- खंड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 18-12-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

New Delhi, the 8th December, 2004 [फा. सं. एस. 11017/13/97- आई . आर. ( पी.एल.) ]

जे.पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

New Delhi , the 8th December, 2004

S.O. 3252. Whers the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so' required that in pursuance of the provisions of sub -clause (vi ) of the clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 1518 dated 15-6-2004 the service in the industry engaged in the Processing of Production of Fuel Gases (Coal Gas , Natural Gas and the like ) which is covered by item 29 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 15th June, 2004.

S.O. 3251. Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so required that in pursuance of the provisions of sub - clause (vi) of the clause ( n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , declaredby the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 1471 dated 11-6-2004 the service in the Iron Ore Mining Industry which is covered by item 16 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act, for a period of six months from the 18th June , 2004 .

Andwhereas, the Central Government is of opinion thatpublic interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months .

And whereas, the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months .

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub - clause (vi ) of clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act, for a period of six months from the 15th December, 2004.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub - clause (vi ) of clause ( n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act, for a period of six months from the 18th December , 2004 .

[ F. No. S- 11017 /2/2003 - IR (PL) ] [F. No. S - 110/ 17 / 13 / 97 - IR(PL ) ]

J.P. PATI , Jt . Secy.

J.P. PATI , Jt. Secy.

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road, Maya Puri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 , 2004