This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं०डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. No. DL ( N ) 04 /0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 8 ]

No.8]

नई दिल्ली, फरवरी 13 फरवरी 19, 2005 शनिवार/माघ 24-माघ 30, 1926

NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 13- FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 SATURDAY/MAGHA 24-MAGHA 30. 1926 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Pert in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 - उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II-Section 3 Sub- section ( ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issuedby the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत और पेंशन मंत्रालय ( कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 7 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 516.-6. आपराधिकआपराधिक प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 के 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार श्री निमई चंद्र पांडा, अधिवक्ता व उनके कनिष्ठ श्री अनिरुद्ध महापात्र को सीबीआई केस आर. सी. 3 ( एस )/ 87 /एस आईयू- II सीबीआई/एसआईसी-1/नई दिल्ली (निर्मल महत्तो हत्याकांड) जो कि अतिरिक्त जिला जज, जमशेद‌पुर, झारखंड की अदालत में 'विचाराधीन है , इससे संबंधित व आनुषंगिक किसी अन्य मामलों में विशेष लोक अभियोजक नियुक्त करती है ।

[सं०225/45/2004- ए.वी.डी. - 11 ]

शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव 414 GI/2005

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS (Department of Personnel and Training) New Delhi, the 7th February , 2005 S. O. 516. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (8) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) . the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Nimai Chandra Panda. Advocate and his junior Shri Aniruddha Mahapatra as Special Public Prosecutor to conduct the CBI case No. RC-3 (S )/87-STU.II/CBI/SIC-1/New Delhi ( Ninual Mehto Murder Case) pending in the Hon'ble Court of District and Sessions Judge, Jamshedpur and any other matter connected therewith and incidental thereto

いつ No. 225/45/2014- AVD -111 SHUBHA THAKUR . Under Seev

(1465) 1466

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

Canara Bank , Gulbarga Main Branch, (3 ) Shri Shivkumar S. Patil, Partner , M/ s . Bhagyalaxmi Industries , M/s . Aditya Industries and M/ s. Sowmya Minerals Private Limited, (4) Smt. Sujatha S. Patil , Proprietrix, M/s. Bhagyalaxmi Trading Company and Partner M/s. Aditya Industries and M/ s . Sowmya Minerals Private Limited, Gulbarga, (5 ) Smt . Gurubai Patil , Partner. M/ s. Bhagyalaxmi Industries and M/s. Aditya Industries, Gulbarga, ( 6 ) Smt . Vijayalaxmi Patil , Partner , M/s. Bhagyalaxmi Industries , Gulbarga , ( 7) Shri Ajit S. Nakedar , Partner M/ s . Bhagyalaxmi Industries , Gulbarga , ( 8 ) Shri Mahesh, Partner, M/ s . Aditya Industrics, Gulbarga and any other public servants or persons in the matter of cash credit limits and cheque discounting facilities and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the said offence, and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of same facts.

[No. 228/8/2005 -AVD. - II]

SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 517.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं . 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं . एचडी 240 पीसीआर 2004दिनांक 22-12-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से श्री एम. एन . दिग्गगई, तत्कालीन वरिष्ठ प्रबंधक, केनरा बैंक, गुलबर्गा मेन ब्रांच, ( 2 ) श्री वाई. एल. चंद्रशेखर, तत्कालीन वरिष्ठ प्रबंधक, केनरा बैंक, गुलबर्गा मेन ब्रांच , ( 3 ) श्री शिव कुमार एस. पाटिल, पार्टनर, मैसर्स भाग्यलक्ष्मी इंडस्ट्रीज, मैसर्स आदित्य इंडस्ट्रीजु, एवं मैसर्स सोम्या मिनरल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, ( 4 ) श्रीमती सुजाथा एस . पाटिल , प्रोपराइट्रिक्स, मैसर्स भाग्यलक्ष्मी ट्रेडिंग कम्पनी, एवं पार्टनर मैसर्स आदित्य इंडस्ट्रीज, एवं मैसर्स सोम्या मिनरल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, गुलबर्गा , ( 5 ) श्रीमती गुरुबाई पाटिल, पार्टनर, मैसर्स भाग्यलक्ष्मी इंडस्ट्रीज, एवं मैसर्स आदित्य इंडस्ट्रीज , गुलबर्गा , (6 ) श्रीमती विजयलक्ष्मी पाटिल, पार्टनर , मैसर्स भाग्यलक्ष्मी इंडस्ट्रीज, गुलबर्गा , ( 7 ) श्री अजीत एस. नेकदर, पार्टनर, मैसर्स भाग्यलक्ष्मी इंडस्ट्रीज, गुलबर्गा , ( 8 ) श्री महेश पार्टनर, मैसर्स आदित्य इंडस्ट्रीज, गुलबर्गा एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध नकद साख सुविधा ओरचेक को बट्टे पर भुनाने की सुविधा के मामले में भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 120- बी सपठित धारा 420 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 (1988का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 (1) (डी) के अधीन मामले के पंजीकरण और दंडनीय अपराधों और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और पडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उ‌द्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषणों के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं० 228/8/2005 - ए.वी.डी.- II ]

शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिष

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005

का.आ. 518.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए महाराष्ट्र राज्य सरकार के पत्र संख्या सी आर एम/ 2005 /4/पीओएल -11 दिनांक 11 जनवरी, 2005 द्वारा सम्प्रेषित महाराष्ट्र राज्य सरकार की सहमति से " गुटका " निर्माताओं और अपराध जगत के बीच मिलीभगत के संबंध में भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 120 बी सपठित भारतीय दण्ड संहिता की धारा 384 , 387 और 34 तथा आयुध अधिनियम की धारा 3 और 25 सपठित महाराष्ट्र संगठित अपराध नियंत्रण अधिनियम, 1999 की धारा 3(1 ) (ii ) , 3 ( 2 ) और 3 ( 4 ) के अधीन जे.जे. मार्ग पुलिस स्टेशन, मुंबई, महाराष्ट्र के मामला सं. 249/2004 का आगे अन्वेषण और उक्तअपयों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों , दुष्प्रेरणों, षडयंत्रों तथा उसीसंव्यवहारके अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्‌धृत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण महाराष्ट्र राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं० 228/17/2005 - ए.वी.डी.- II ]

शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005 S. O. 517. In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-section( 1 ) ofSection 5 read with Section 6 ofthe Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946), the Central Govemment with the consent of State Government of Karnataka , vide Notification No. HD 240 PCR 2004 dated 22-12-2004, hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction ofthe members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for theregistration of the case and investigation of offence punishable under Section 120 -B read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) and Section 13(2) read with Section 13 ( 1 ) ( d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988 ) and substantive offences thereof, against Shri M.N. Diggai , the then Senior Manager, Canara Bank , Gulbarga Main Branch, (2) Shri Y. L. Chandrashekar , the then Senior Manager ,

S. O. 518. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Maharashtra communicated vide LetterNo. CRM/2005/ 4/POL - 11 dt. Jan. 11 , 2005 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Maharashtra for further investigation of Case No. 249/2004 of J. J. Marg Police Station, Mumbai .

1467

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Maharashtra under section 120 -B of IPC read with Sections 384 , 387 and 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of theArms Act read with Sections 3 ( 1 ) ( ii ) , 3 (2 ) and 3 (4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 relating to nexus between ' gutka ' manufacturers and the underworld, and attempts , abetments , conspiracies it relation to, or in connection with the said offences , and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[No. 228/ 17/2005-AVD. - ID

SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 519.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 239 पीसीआर 2004 दिनांक 22-12-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से ( 1 ) श्री मनोहर एच. आहूजा, पार्टनर, मैसर्स भारत इंतफाब, फातिमा विल्ला , 30 फीट रोड, निकट पाली नाका, बांद्रा (वेस्ट) , मुंबई (2 ) श्री अमित एम. आहूजा, पार्टनर, मैसर्स भारत इंतफाब , फातिमा विल्ला, 30 फीट रोड, निकट पाली नाका, बांद्रा (वेस्ट), मुंबई ( 3 ) श्री महेश के. असरानी, नं. 15 - ए, तुलसी बिल्डिंग, दत्ता पाडारोड, बोरीवल्ली ( वेस्ट) , मुंबई (4 ) मैसर्स संजीव कंचन एंड कंपनी , 4 - मिलान बिल्डिंग , 189/93 , बाजार गेट स्ट्रीट, पेरिन नरीमन स्ट्रीट, फोर्ट, मुंबई और ( 5 ) श्री जे. कनकराजन, तत्कालीन प्रबंधक (क्रेडिट) , सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , अंधेरी ( ईस्ट) , मुंबई एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मुंबई द्वारा साख सुविधाएं मंजूर करने के मामले में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 120- बी सपठित धारा 420 , 467, 468 और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( डी) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्ररेणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं० 228/4/2005 - ए.वी.डी. - 11 ]

शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005 S. O. 519. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 239 PCR 2004 dated 22-12-2004 hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for the investigation ofoffence punishable under Section 120- Bread with 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) and Section 13 ( 2) read with 13 (1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988) against ( 1 ) Shri Manohar H. Ahuja , Partner, M/sBharat Intfab , Fatima Villa , 30 Fert Road, Near Pali Naka, Bandra (West) , Mumbai (2 ) Shri Amit M. Ahuja , Partner, M/s Bharat Intfab. Fatima Villa , 30 Feet Road, Near Pali Naka , Bandra ( West ), Mumbai (3 ) Shri Mahesh K. Asrani , No. 15 -A, Tulsi building , Dutta Pada Road, Borivali (West),Mumbai ( 4 ) M/s Sanjeev Kanchen and Company, 4-Milan Building, 189/93 , Bazar Gate Street, Perin Nariman Street, Fort , Mumbai and (5 ) Shri J. Kanakrajan , the then Manager(Credit), Central Bank of India , Andheri (East). Mumbai and any other public servants or persons in the matter ofgrant of credit facilities by Central Bank of India, Mumbai and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to, or in connection with the said offences , and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[No. 228/4/2005 - AVD . - II] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 520.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 238 पीसीआर 2004 दिनांक 13-12-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से ( 1 ) श्री मनोहर लाल एच. आहूजा, पार्टनर, मैसर्स स्वीफ्ट सर्विसिज लिनिंग्स, 112 नवयुग इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, टी. जे . रोड, सेवरी ( वेस्ट) , मुंबई ( 2 ) श्री अमित मनोहर लाल आहूजा, पार्टनर, मैसर्स स्वीफ्ट सर्विसिज लिनिंग्स , 112 , नवयुग इंडस्ट्रीयल स्टेट, टी. जे. रोड, सेवरी ( वेस्ट) , मुंबई एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, मुंबई द्वारा 250 लाख रुपये की साख सुविधाएं मंजूर करने के मामले में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 (1860का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 120- बी सपठित धारा 420, 468 और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( डी ) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त और उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं० 228/7/2005 - ए.वी.डी.- II ]

शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S. O. 520. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of 1468

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for the registration of the case and investigation of offences punishable under Section 120- B and 420 , of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( Act No. 45 of 1860) and section 13 ( 2 ) read with 13 ( 1 ) ( d ) of Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988 ) and substantive offences thereof, against Shri K. Gangaraju , Senior Estate Supervisor , Indian Statistical Institute , Bangalore , and any other public servants or persons in the matter of securing employment in the Indian Statistical Institute , Bangalore on the basis of false certificates of age and experience and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to , or in connectionwith the said offence , and any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 239 PCR 2004 dated 13-12-2004 hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establislunent to the whole of the State of Karnataka for the investigation of offences punishable under section 120 -B read with 420 , 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and Section 13 (2 ) read with 13 (1 ) (d) ofPrevention of Corruption Act , 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988 ) against ( 1 ) Shri Manoharlal H. Ahuja , Partner, M/ s Swift Services Linings , 112, Navyug Industrial Estate, T. J. Road, Sewri (West) , Mumbai (2) Shri Anit Manoharlal Ahuja, Partner, M/ s Swift Services Linings , 112 , Navyug Industrial Estate , T. J. Road , Sewri ( West ) , Mumbai and any other public servants or persons in the matter of grant of credit facilities of Rs . 250 lakhs by the Bank of India , Mumbai and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to, or in connection with the said offence, and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[No. 228/5/2005 -AVD- II ] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 11 फरवरी , 2005

[No. 228/7/2005 -AVD . - II] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 522.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 5 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के साथ पठित धारा 6 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केरल राज्य सरकार के गृह ( जे ) विभाग की दिनांक 26-06-2003 की अधिसूचना संख्या 19333 /जे2/ 02/गृह द्वारा प्राप्त केरल सरकार की सम्मति से अलप्पुजा दक्षिण पुलिस स्टेशन में दर्ज आपराधिक प्रकरण संख्या 342/98 जो श्री ए. तंगल कुंजू की पुलिस हिरासत में मृत्यु से संबंधित है और जिसे सी. आई. डी. अपराध शाखा में आपराधिक प्रकरण संख्या 167/सी.आर. /98 के रूप में पुनः संख्यांकित किया गया, की जाँच के लिए और उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत उक्तअपराध से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त दुष्प्रयासों, दुष्प्रेरणों तथा षडयंत्रों के अथवा किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण केरल राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं० 228/62/2004- ए.वी.डी.- II ]

शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 11th February , 2005 का.आ. 521.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं . 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 256 पीसीआर 2004 दिनांक 21-12-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से श्री के. गंगाराजू, वरिष्ठ संपदा पर्यवेक्षक, भारतीय सांख्यिकीय संस्थान, बंगलौर एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भारतीय सांख्यिकीय संस्थान, बंगलौर में आयु और अनुभव के फर्जी प्रमाणपत्रों के आधार पर नौकरी प्राप्त करने के मामले में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 120 - बी और 420 , तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( डी) के अधीन मामले के पंजीकरण और दंडनीय अपराधों और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं० 228/ 5/2005 - ए.वी.डी.- II ] शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

S. O. 522. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Kerala Home ( J ) department vide Notification No. 19333 /J2/02/Home, dated 23-06-2003 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members ofthe Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Kerala for the investigation into the case Cr . No. 342/98 of Alappuzha South Police Station, renumbered as Cr . No. 167/CR/ 98 of Crime Branch CID , Alappuzha regarding death of A. Thangal Kunju while in police custody, and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in S. O. 521. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 256 PCR 2004 dated 21-12-2004 hereby extends भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

relation to or in connection with the said offence , or any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[No. 228/62/2004-AVD . -II] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्व विभाग ) (केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड ) नई दिल्ली , 2 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 523.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 (23छ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर - निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-05 से कर-निर्धारण वर्ष 2020-21 (दिनांक 8-11-2019 तक) अर्थात् भारतीय राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग प्राधिकरण के साथ निष्पन्न दिनांक 9-10-2001 की रियायत करार में यथा विनिर्दिष्ट 17 वर्ष 6 माह की अवधि के लिए अथवा उससे पहले उपर्युक्त करार की शर्तों का उल्लंघन होने की स्थिति में नीचे पैरा ( 3 ) में उल्लिखित उद्यम/ उपक्रम के अनुमोदन को नवीकृत करती है । 2 यह अनुमोदन इस शर्त के अधीन है कि:-

( i) उद्यम/उपक्रम आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ केसाथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 10 (23छ) के उपबंधों के अनुरूप होगा और उनका अनुपालन करेगा;

( ii ) केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि उद्यम/उपक्रम : -

(क) आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 25 के स्पष्टीकरण ( ख ) में यथा परिभाषित पात्र कारोबार को जारी रखना बंद कर देता है ; अथवा (ख ) खाता बहियों का रख - रखाव नहीं करता है तथा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उपनियम ( 6 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित किसी लेखाकार द्वारा ऐसे खातों की लेखा परीक्षा नहीं कराता है ; अथवा

(ग) आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उप- नियम (6 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करता है ।

(iii ) नीचे पैरा-3 में उल्लिखित उद्यम आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 80 झक ( 4) ( i ) ( ग ) की शर्तों और भारतीय राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग प्राधिकरण के साथ निष्पन्न दिनांक 9-10-2001 की रियायत करार के अनुसार इसका विकास करने के उपरान्त अवसंरचनात्मक सुविधा का प्रचालन और रख- रखाव शुरू करता है, ऐसा न होने पर इस अनुमोदन को वापिस ले लिया जाएगा । 3. अनुमोदित उद्यम/उपक्रम है:-

मैसर्स जी. एम. आर. तुनी अनाकापल्ली एक्सप्रेसवेज प्रा. लि. , 6-3-866/1/जी-2, ग्रीनलैण्ड्स, वैगमपैट, हैदराबाद -500016

1469 को भारतीय राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग प्राधिकरण के साथ निष्पन्न दिनांक 9-10-2001 के रियायत करार के अनुसार निर्माण प्रचालन तथा हस्तांतरण आधार पर आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य में एन. एच -5 पर 300/0 किमी. से 359/20 किमी. तक मौजूदा दो लेन वाले राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग को मजबूत करने तथा तुनी अनाकापल्ली खंड में4लेन वाले दोहरे कैरिजवे को चौड़ा करने की उनकी परियोजना हेतु । (फा. सं. 205/60/ 2001 - आ.क.नि- II ) ( खंड- I) [अधिसूचना सं ० 22/2005/फा. सं. 205/60/2001-आ.क.नि-11 (खंड-1) ]

निधिसिंह, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (Central Board of Direct Taxes) New Delhi , the 2nd February, 2005 S. O. 523. It is notified for general information thatapproval to the enterprise/ undertaking , listed at para (3) below has been renewed by the Central Government for the purpose of Section 10 (23G) of the Income -tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 2E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 with effect from the Assessment Year 2005-06 to Assessment Year 2020-2021 ( upto 8-11-2019) i.e. for a period of 17 years 6 months as specified in the concession agreement dated 9-10-2001 entered into with the National Highway Authority of India , or earlier, in the event of violation of the terms of the agreement aforesaid.

2. The approval is subject to the conditions that :-

( i) the enterprise/undertaking will conform to and complywith the provisions of Section 10 (23G) ofthe Income-tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 2E ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 ;

(ii) the Central Government shall withdraw this approval if the enterprise/ undertaking- (a) ceases to carry on the eligible business as defined in Explanation (b) to Rule 2E of I.T. Rules , 1962 ; or.

(b) fails to maintain books of account and get such accounts audited by an accountant as required by sub - rule (6) of Rule 2E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962; or

(iii) the enterprise mentioned in Para 3 below starts operating and inaintaining the infrastructure facility after developing it in terms of Section 801A(4)( i) ( c) of the Income- tax Act , 1961 and in accordance with the concession agreement dated 09-10-2001 entered into with the National Highway Authority of India , failing which the approval shall be withdrawn .

1470

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

3. The enterprise/ undertaking approved is :-

M/ s GMR Tuni Anakapalli Expressways Pvt . Ltd. , 6-3-866/1 /G2 , Greenlands , Begumpet, Hyderabad- 500016 , for their project of strengthening of the existing 2 lanes of national highway from Km. 300/0 to Km. 359/20 and widening thereof to 4 lanes dual carriageway in Tuni - Anakapalli section on NH - 5 in the State of Andhra Pradesh on Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) basis as per concession agreement dated 9-10-2001 entered into with the National Highways Authority of India (F. No. 205/60/2001 - ITA- II) (Vol . 1) .

|Notification No. 22/2005/F . No. 205/ 60/ 2001 - ITA - II (Vol.1) ]

NIDHI SINGH , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 2 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 524.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2 ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 10 (23छ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर- निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-05 से कर-निर्धारण वर्ष 2006-2007 तक के लिए नीचे पैरा ( 3 ) में उल्लिखित उद्यम/उपक्रम के अनुमोदन को नवीकृत करती है ।

2. यह अनुमोदन इस शर्त के अधीन है कि: -

(i ) उद्यम/उपक्रम आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 (23छ ) के उपबंधों के अनुरूप होगा और उनका अनुपालन करेगा;

(ii) केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि उद्यम/उपक्रम : -

(क) आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के स्पष्टीकरण ( ख ) में यथा परिभाषित पात्र कारोबार को जारी रखना बंद कर देता है ; अथवा (ख ) खाता बहियो का रख - रखाव नहीं करता है तथा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ड. के उपनियम ( 6 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित किसी लेखाकार द्वारा ऐसे खातों की लेखा परीक्षा नहीं कराता है; अथवा

(ग) आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2 ङ के उप नियम ( 6 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करता है ।

3. अनुमोदित उद्यम/उपक्रम है : -

मैसर्स एल. वी. एस. पावर लिमिटेड , 8-2-269 /एस/90 , रोड सं. 2, सागर को- आप. हाऊसिंग सोसायटी, बनजारा हिल्स, हैदराबाद-500034 को गुररमपालेम गांव, पेंडुरथी मंडल विशाखापटनम्, जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश स्थित 37.8 मैगावाट पावर प्लांटके लिए ( फा . सं. 205/59/2000-आ.क.नि- II ) ( खंड-1 ) [अधिसूचना सं० 21 /2005/फा. सं. 205/ 59/2000- आ.क.नि-11

(खंड- I) ]

निधि सिंह, अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 2nd February, 2005

S. O. 524. It is notified for general information thatapproval to the enterprise/ undertaking , listed at para (3) below has been renewed by the Central Government for the purpose of Section 10( 23G) of the Income -tax Act , 1961, read with Rule 2E of the Income - tax Rules , 1962 with effect from the Assessment Year 2004-2005 to Assessment Year2006-2007

2. The approval is subject to the conditions that :-

( i) the enterprise / undertaking will conform to and comply with the provisions of Section 100 (23G) ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961 , read with Rule 2E ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962;

(ii) the Central Government shall withdraw this approval if the enterprise/ undertaking:-

(a) ceases to carry on the eligible business asdefined in Explanation (b) to Rule 2E ofI.T. Rules , 1962 ; or

(b) fails to maintain books of account and get such accounts audited by an accountant as required by sub -rule (6) of Rule 2E of the Income- tax Rules , 1962; or

3. The enterprise/ undertaking approved is:-

M/sLVS Power Limited, 8-2-269/S /90 , Road No. 2 . Sagar Co - op . Housing Society , Banjara Hills , Hyderabad -500034 for their 37.8 MW power Plant at Gurrampalem Village . Pendurthy Mandal Vishakhapatnam District . Andhra Pradesh . (F. No. 205/59/2000 - ΙΤΑ- II) (Vol . 1 )

[Notification No. 21 /2005 /F. No. 205 /59/ 2000 - ITA - II (Vol.1) ]

NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 7 फरवरी , 2005

आयकर

का.आ. 525.-सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है-

(i ) संस्था वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान और परिरक्षण कार्यकलापों सहित गैर-अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग-अलग लेखा-बहियों का रख- रखाव करेगी ।

(ii ) अधिसूचित संस्था प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गतिविधियों को वार्षिक विवरणी प्रत्येक वर्ष ? । मई कोअथवा उससे पहले सचिव वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग ' टेक्नोलॉजी भवन' न्यू महरोली रोड, नई दिल्ली-110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1471

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

(iii ) अधिसूचित संस्था केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोनिर्दिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों , जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क) आयकर महानिदेशक (छूट ) आयकर भवन, 9 वां और 10वां तल, सैक्टर 3 , वैशाली , गाजियाबाद, ( ख ) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अन्धान विभाग तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी । अनुमोदित संगठन का

क्रम सं.

नाम

अषधि जिसके लिए अधिसूचनाप्रभावी है 1 .

1-4-2003 से

31-3-2006 मैसर्स फाउंडेशन फार रिवाइट- लाइजेशन ऑफ लोकल हैल्थ ट्रेडिशन्स, 74/2 , जरकबंडे कावेल पोस्टअट्टूर रोड, वाया येलाहंका, बंगलौर-560064

टिप्पणी: ( i ) उपर्युक्त शर्त ( i ) " संघ " के रूप में श्रेणीबद्ध संगठन परलागू नहीं होगी ।

( ii ) अधिसूचित संस्था को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक (छूट) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं . 44/2005/फा. सं. 203/ 126/2003- आ.क.नि. - 11 ]

निधिसिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th February , 2005 INCOME-TAX

S.O. 525. It is hereby notifiod for general information that the organisation mentioned below has been approved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below, for the purpose of clause (ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income Tax Rules , 1962 under the category " Institution " subject to the following conditions :-

(1) The Institution shall maintain separate books of accounts for scientific research and non- research activities including conservation aetivities;

(ü) The notified Institution shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary , Department of Scientific and Industrial Research , 'Technology Bhawan' , New Mehrauli Road. New Delhi - 110016 for every financial year on or before 31st May of each year ;

)س( The notified Institution shall submit , on behalf ofthe Central Government , to ( a) the Director General of Income Tax (Exemption) , Aayakar Bhawan, 9th and 10 Floor , Sector 3 , Vaishali , Ghaziabad , (b) the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research , and (c) the Commissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction over the organisation , on or before the 31st October each year , a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income and Expenditure Account in respect ofits research activities for which exemption was granted under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income tax Act , 1961 in addition to the return of income tax to the designated assessing officer.

Sl . Name of the organisation No. approved

Period for which notification is effective

1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 1. M/ s. Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health

Traditions,

74/2 , Jarakabande Kaval ,

Post Attur Road,

ViaYelahanka,

Bangalore- 560064

Notes : ( i ) Condition ( i) above will not apply to the organisation categorized as " Association " .

(ii) The notified Institution is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Coinmissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction . Three copies of the application for renewal of approval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientifie and Industrial Research.

[Notification No. 44/2005 /F. No. 203 / 126/2003 -ITA - 11 | NIDHI SINGH . Under Secv .

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005 आयकर

का.आ. 526.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( v ) द्वारा प्राप्त शक्तियों काप्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " कैथोलिक बिशसप कांफ्रेस ऑफ इंडिया , नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्: -

(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है। 1472

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

(ii ) कर निधारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखीजाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल कुरेगा;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं . 46/2005/फा. सं. 197/74/2004- आयकर नि. - 1 ]

दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 10th February , 2005 INCOME -TAX

S. O. 526. In exercise of powers conferred by the sub-clause (v ) of Clause ( 23C) of Section 10 of the Income tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Catholic Bishops Conference of India , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessinent year 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions namely : -

(i) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the object for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in sub- section ( 5 ) of Section 11;

(üⅲ) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness, unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income- tax authority in

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 46/2005/ F . No. 197/74/2004 - ITA-1 ] DEEPAK GARG , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

आयकर

का.आ. 527.- आयकर अधिनियम 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप - खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " श्री श्री ठाकुर रामचन्द्र देव एसोसिएशन ( रजि. ) , नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004- 2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्: -

( i) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि(जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी , जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी।

[अधिसूचना सं. 47/ 2005/फा. सं. 197/ 129 /2004- आयकर नि. - 1 ]

दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 10th February , 2005

INCOME-TAX

S. O. 527. In exercise of powers conferred by the sub - clause (v) of Clause (23C) of Section 100 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1473

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30, 1926

notifies the " Sri Sri Thakur Ramchandra Dev Association (Regd. ) , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub- clause for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05 subject tothe following conditions namely:-

@ the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furnitureetc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment ycars mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in sub -section ( 5) of Section 11 ;

(ⅲ) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidentalto the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Incoine - tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- taxAct, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 47/2005/F . No. 197/129/2004-ΙΤΑΙ]

DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी , 2005

आयकर

का.आ. 528.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 (1961 का43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " क्राई- चाईल्ड रिलीफ एण्डयू, मुम्बई " को कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2003-04 से 2005-06 तकके लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्:-

(i) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ⅱ ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिद्ध ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

414 GI/2005-2

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबर उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोवार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती (iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(v ) विघटन को स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 6/2005/फा. सं. 197/131/2004-आयकर नि.-1]

दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 19th January, 2005

INCOME- TAX

S. O. 528. In exercise of powers conferred by the sub-clause (v) of Clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "CRY - Child Relief & You , Mumbai " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2005-06 subject to the following conditions namely:-

0 theassessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects forwhich it is established;

(1) theassessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery . furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any oneor more ofthe forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of Section 11 ;

(i) thisnotification will not apply in relationto any income being profits and gains of business, unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are Inaintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Incoine -tax authority in accordancewith the provisions ofthe income- taxAct, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 6/2005/F. No. 197/ 131 /2004 -ITA- 1 ]

DEEPAK GARG , Under Secy.

1474

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 31 जनवरी, 2005

आयकर

का.आ. 529.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा " जवाहरलाल नेहरू मेमोरियल फण्ड, नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 2005-06 से 2007-08 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात:-

(i) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न उसकी निधि ( जेवर-जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्तिके प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग सेलेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धमार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं० 19/2005/फा. सं० 197/ 153/2004- आयकर नि. 1 ]

दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 31st January , 2005 INCOME TAX

S.O. 529. In excercise of powers conferred by the sub- clause ( iv ) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund, New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub- clause for the assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-2008 subject to the following conditions , namely : -

( i) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub- section(5) of Section 11 ;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment ofthe objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- taxAct, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a chartitable organisation with similar objectives .

[NotificationNo. 19/2005 /F . No. 197/ 153/2004 - ITA - 1 ] DEEPAK GARG , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 31 जनवरी , 2005 आयकर

का.आ. 530.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " नेताजी रिसर्च ब्यूरो , कोलकाता" को वर्ष 2004-05 से 2006-07 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात:-

(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न उसकी निधि ( जेवर-जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहींकरेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों कीप्राप्तिके प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

1475

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माथ 30, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(iv ) कर निर्धारिती आय- कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों केअनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय- कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धमार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं० 20/2005/फा. सं०197/151/2004-आय-कर नि. 1 ]

दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 31st January, 2005

INCOME-TAX

S.O. 530. In exercise of the powers conferredby the sub - clause ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Netaji Research Bureau , Kolkata " for the purpose ofthe said sub - clause for the assessment year 2005-06 to 2007-08 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application , wholly ana exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relationto any income being profits and gains of business. unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives ofthe assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its returm of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions ofthe Income- taxAct, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 20/2005/F. No. 197/ 151 /2004- ITA- ]

DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.

(आर्थिक कार्य विभाग)

(बैंकिग प्रभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 531.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 (1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारत सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिशों पर, एत‌द्वारा , घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ग ) कीउप- धारा ( 1 ) और ( ii ) के उपबंध उस सीमा तक, एचडीएफसी बैंक लि. के प्रबंधक निदेशक श्री आदित्य पुरी पर लागू नहीं होंगे जहां तक इसका संबंध वर्ष 2005 के लिए मास्टर कार्ड इंटरनेशनल के एसएएमईए बोर्ड में निदेशक के रूप में उनकी नियुक्ति से है ।

[फा. सं. 13/1/2005- बीओए ]

डी. पी. भारद्वाज, अवर सचिव (Department of Economic Affairs) (BANKING DIVISION)

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005 S.O. 531. In exercise of the powers conferredby Section53 ofthe Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of1949) the Government of India on the recommendations of the ReserveBank of India , hereby declares that the provisions ofsub -section(i) & ( ii) of clause ( C) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the said Act shall not apply to Shri Aditya Puri,Managing Director, HDFC Bank Ltd. , in so far as it relates to his appointment as a director on the SAMEA Boardofthe Master Card International for 2005.

[F.No. 13/1 /2005 -BOA]

D. P. BHARDWAJ , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 532.- भारतीय निर्यात आयात बैंक अधिनियम, 1981 (1981 का 28 ) की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ङ) के उपखंड ( झ ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा श्रीमती सूर्याकान्ती त्रिपाठी, अपर सचिव ( ईआर ) , विदेश मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली को श्री राजीव सिकरी के स्थान पर भारतीय निर्यात आयात बैंक में निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 24( 1 )/2003-आईएफ-1 ]

मार्गरेट गंगटे, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 10th February, 2005 S.O. 532. In pursuance of sub - clause ( i) of clause (e) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of Export - Import Bank ofIndia Act, 1981 (28 of 1981 ) , the Central Government hereby nominates Smt. Suryakanthi Tripathi , Additional Secretary(ER), Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi as a Director on theBoard ofExport - linport Bank of India vice ShriRajiv Sikri.

[F. No. 24/1/2003 - IF - I]

MARGARET GANGTE , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 533.-यत बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 की धारा 45 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा उसके अनुसार केन्द्रीय सरकार ने बैंक ऑफ तमिलनाडु लि. के इंडियन ओवरसीज़ बैंक में विलय के लिए 20 फरवरी , 1990 को एक योजना मंजूर की थी । 1476

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

यतः उक्त योजना के खंड 6 के उपखंड ( ix ) के अधीन इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक द्वारा बैंक ऑफ तमिलनाडु लि. , तिरुनलवेलि की तत्काल वसूली न की जा सकने वाली ( एन आर आर ) परिसंपत्तियों का अंतिम मूल्यांकन किया जाना अपेक्षित था, जो कि बैंक आफ तमिलनाडु लि. , के इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक में विलय के समय नियत तारीख (अर्थात् 20 फरवरी , 1990 ) को अनन्तिम रूप से मूल्यांकित कर ली गयीहै।

यतः बड़ी संख्या में परिसंपत्तियां अंतर्ग्रस्त होने और बैंक के प्रयासों के बावजूद अधिकांश मदों की वसूलियां अभी बाकी होने के कारण, इंडियन ओवरसीरज़ बैंक ने यह अभ्यावेदन किया है कि बैंक, विलयन की योजना के खंड 6 के उपखंड ( ix ) में विनिर्दिष्ट समय के भीतर परिसंपत्तियों का अंतिम रूप से मूल्यांकन नहीं कर पाया है । और यतः , केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने पर इस बात से संतुष्ट है कि विलयन की योजना को लागू करने में कठिनाई पैदा हो गयी है और बैंक ऑफ तमिलनाडु लि. की तत्काल वसूली न की जा सकने वाली परिसंपत्तियों का अंतिम रूप से मूल्यांकन करने के लिए अपेक्षित समय बढ़ा कर इस कठिनाई को दूर करना जरूरी है ।

अतः अब बैंक ऑफ तमिलनाडु लि. के इंडियन ओवरसीज़ बैंक में विलय की 19 फरवरी , 1990 की योजना के खंड 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा निदेश देती है कि इंडियन ओवरसीज़ बैंक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के साथ परामर्श से तथा उसके अनुमोदन से बैंक ऑफ तमिलनाडु लि. की तत्काल वसूली न की जा सकने वाली उन परिसंपत्तियों का, जिनकी वसूली और मूल्यांकन नहीं हुआ है , बढ़ाई गयी तारीख से एक और वर्ष की अवधि के भीतर ( अर्थात्19 फरवरी , 2005 तक ) मूल्यांकन करेगा ।

[सं. 13/1/2002-बीओए ]

डी. पी. भारद्वाज, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 10th February , 2005

S.O. 533. Whereas on 20th February , 1990 , a Scheme of Amalgamation of the Bank of Tamilnadu Ltd. , with the Indian Overeas Bank was sanctioned by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferredby and in accordance with Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act , 1949;

Whereas under sub - clause ( ix) of clause 6 of the said Scheme , the Indian Overseas Bank was required to make a final valuation of the Not Readily Realisable ( NRR ) assets oftheBank ofTamilnadu Ltd. , Tirunelveli , which have been provisionally valued on the prescribed date ( i.e. 20th February , 1990 ) at the time of amalgamation of bank of Tamilnadu Ltd. with Indian Overseas Bank .

Whereas the Indian Overseas Bank has represented that in view of the large number of assets involved and the recovery of most of the items yet to be realized in spite of its efforts , it has not been able to make the final valuation

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)]

within the time specified in sub - clause ( ix) of the clause 6 of the Scheme of Amalgamation .

And whereas the Central Government , in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India is satisfied thatdifficulty has arisen in giving effect to the Scheme of Amalgamation which , it is necessary to remove by extending the time within which the final yaluation of the NRR assets of BOTL is required to be made;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause 17 of the Scheme of Amalgamation dated 19th February, 1990 of the Bank of Tamilnadu Ltd. with Indian Overseas Bank the Central Government hereby directs that the Indian Overseas Bank , shall , in consultation with and with the approval of the Reserve Bank of India , value the NRR assets ofthe Bank of Tamilnadu Ltd. which have not beenrealized and valued , within a period of further one year ( i.e. by 19th February , 2005) from the ealier extended date (i.e. 19th February , 2004) .

[No. 13/1/2002-BOA]

D. P. BHARDWAJ, Under Secy.

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

} (स्वास्थ्यविभाग ) (पी.एम.एस. अनुभाग )

د नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 534.- दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सक परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद, एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्: -

क्रम संख्या 51 तथा उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के सामने निम्नलिखित प्रतिस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

( i ) बैचलर आफ बी डी एस चेन्नई

(बीडीएस)

( यदि 21-6-1999 को अथवा उसके

51. श्री रामचन्द्र कालेज और अनुसंधान संस्थान (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) चेन्नई ( तमिलनाडु )

डेंटल सर्जरी पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो)

एम डी एस

( ii) मास्टर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी- (ओरल

मैक्सिलोफेशियल

एंड सर्जरी ) चेन्नई

ओरल एंड मैक्सिलोफेसियल सर्जरी , [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

1477

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

यदि 20 नवम्बर, 2003को अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो।

एम डी एस (प्रोस्थोडान्टिक्स) चेन्नई

-प्रोस्थोडान्टिक्स यदि20 नवम्बर, 2003को अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ।

एम डी एस (आर्थोडान्टिक्स)

51. Sri Ramachandra College& Research Institute (Deemed University) Chennai (TamilNadu)

-आर्थोडान्टिक्स यदि25 नवम्बर, 2003को अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ।

एम डी एस (पीरियडान्टिक्स) चेन्नई

-पीरियडान्टिक्स यदि 28 नवम्बर, 2003 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ।

एम डी एस ( ओरल मेडिसिन एंड रेडियोलाजी ) , चेन्नई

-ओरल मेडिसिन एंड रेडियोलाजी यदि30 नवम्बर, 2003 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो।

एम डी एस (कन्जर्वेटिव डेन्टिस्ट्री), चेन्नई

- कन्जर्वेटिव डेन्टिस्ट्री यदि 25 नवम्बर, 2003को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कोगई हो।

एम डी एस (ओरल पैथोलाजी) चेन्नई

-ओरल पैथोलाजी यदि22 नवम्बर, 2003कोअथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगईहो।

[फा. सं. वी.-12017/2/ 98- पीएमएस ]

ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department ofHealth)

(P.M.S. SECTION)

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

S.O. 534. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub -section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948

(16 of 1948), the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby makes the following amendments in Part -I of the Scheduleto the said Act . namely:-

For Serial No. 51 and entries relating thereto , the following shall be substituted , namely:-

BDS Chennai (1) Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) (When granted onorafter 21-6-1999)

(ii)Master ofDental Surgery-

MDS ( Oral &Maxillo- facial Surgery) . Chennai -Oral& Maxillo- facial Surgery, ifgranted on or after 20th November, 2003

MDS (Prostho- dontics). Chennai -Prosthodontics, ifgranted on or after20th November, 2003

MDS (Orthodon- tics)

Orthodontics ifgranted on or after 25th November , 2003

MDS (Perio- dontics). Chennai -Periodontics ifgranted on or after28th November, 2003

MDS ( Oral Medicine &Radiology Chennai -Oral Medicine & Radiology ifgranted on or after30th November , 2003

MDS(Con- servative Dentistry). Chennai -Conservative Dentistry ifgranted on or after25th November, 20003

MDS(Oral Pathology). Chennai -Oral Pathology ifgranted on or after22nd November, 2003

[F. No.V - 12017/2/ 98 -PMS A. K. SINGH. Under Secy.

1478

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 13 जनवरी , 2005

का०आ० 535.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा नीदरलैंड मीत्नस्तीतुट, हुधो डी गुनप्लेइन 1 , डुरडेइपत नीदरलैंड द्वारा जारी अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र के साथ इसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की उपधारा ( 3 ) के परन्तुक ( iii ) और धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जी ई सी मारकोनी अब्बै वर्क्स टीटचपाइन , फरेहेम , हेम्पशाइर पी ओ 144 क्यो ए ग्रेट ब्रिटेन द्वारा विनिर्मित जल से भिन्न मीटर और भारत में डैनमार्क इंजीनियर 37 वाइटहाल 143 , अगस्त क्रान्ति मार्ग , केम्पस कार्नर, मुंबई -400036 द्वारा विप्पणित सी एम 1000 और सी एम 1400 श्रृंखला के और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2003 / 548 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

56814 यह मॉडल ( आकृति देखिए ) किसी यांत्रिक अनुरूप आयतन प्रदर्श और किसी प्ल्सर सहित जल से भिन्न अन्य तरलों के लिए एक मीटर है जो 1400 ली ० प्रति मि ० के अधिकतम प्रवाह दर और 100 लीटर/ प्रति मि ० के न्यूनतम प्रवाह दर सहित 10.5 बार के अधिकतम दाब के अधीन कार्य करता है । इसकी यथार्थता वर्ग 0.5 है । माप का सिद्धान्त धनात्मक विस्थापन है और प्रदर्शन प्रणाली पर प्रदर्शित की जाती है । मुद्रण यंत्र विन्यास और विन्यास पूर्व वैकल्पिक है । खनिज तेल की विशेषताएं 0.47 एम पी ए एस के गैसोलिन और इनकी सघनता 715.3 कि ० ग्रा० /मी³ , और विलायक 145 एम पी ए एस और सघनता 844 कि ० ग्रा० /मी और गैस तेल की चिपचिपाहट 3.92 एम पी ए एस और 20 ° सें ० पर उपचारित 839 कि ० ग्रा ० /मी³ की सघनता है ।

[ फा. सं ० डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 157 )/ 2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1479 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30, 1926

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

New Delhi , the 13th January , 2005

S.O. 535. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority alongwith the model approval certificate issued by the Netherlands Meetinstitutt , Hugo de Grootplein 1 , Dordrecht, The Netherlands , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to Sub - section ( 3 ) and Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe Meter for Liquid other than Water model of series CM 1000 and CM 1400 manufactured by GEC Marconi Abbey Works Titchfied, Fareham Hampshire PO 144 QA Great Britain marketed in India by M/ s. Dynamark Engineers , 37 , Whitehall 143 , August Kranti Marg , Kemps Corner , Mumbai -400 036 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13 / 2003/548;

No eros 56314 The model (see the figure given above) is a meter for liquids other than water with a mechanical analog volume indicator and a pulser, working under maximum pressure of 10.5 bar , with a maximum flow rate of 1400 litre/ minute and minimum flow rate of 100 litre/minute belonging to accuracy class 0.5 . The principle of measurement is positive displacement . The measured quantity is indicated on a Master Load - II digital measuring and displaying system . Printing mechanism and pre - setting mechanism are optional . The characteristics of fuels measured are Gasoline of viscosity 0.47 mPa.s and density 715.3 kg/ m³ , Solvent of viscosity 1.45 mPa.s and density 844 kg/ m³ , Gas - oil of viscosity 3.92 mPa.s and density 839 kg/ m³ measured at 20 ° C .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 157)/ 2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1480

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी , 2005

का०आ ० 536.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा नीदरलैंड मीत्नस्तीतुट, हुधो डी गुनप्लेइन 1 , डुरडेइपत ( नीदरलैंड द्वारा जारी अनुमोदन ) प्रमाण- पत्र के साथ इसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की उपधारा ( 3 ) के परन्तुक ( iii ) और धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जी ई सी मारकोनी अब्बै वर्क्स टीटचपाइन , फरेहेम, हेम्पशाइर पी ओ 144 क्यो ए ग्रेट ब्रिटेन द्वारा विनिर्मित जल से भिन्न मीटर और भारत में डैनमार्क इंजीनियर 37, वाइटहाल 143 , अगस्त क्रान्ति मार्ग, केम्पस कार्नर, मुंबई -400036 द्वारा विप्पणित सी एम 3000 और सी एम 4000 श्रृंखला के और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2003 / 549 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

No TP 75 PSI

यह मॉडल ( आकृति देखिए ) किसी यांत्रिक अनुरूप आयतन प्रदर्श और किसी प्ल्सर सहित जल से भिन्न अन्य तरलों के लिए एक मीटर है जो 4000 ली० /प्रति मि ० के अधिकतम प्रवाह दर और 400 लीटर/ प्रति मि० के न्यूनतम प्रवाह दर सहित 10.5 बार के अधिकतम दाब के अधीन कार्य करता है । जिसकी न्यूनतम माप मात्र 500 लीटर है । 10 से ० मी ० या 15 से ० मी ० कारों का है । जो यथार्थता वर्ग 0.5 वाला है । माप का सिद्धान्त घनात्मक विस्थापन है । मापी गई मात्रा मास्टर लोड- II अंक मापमान और प्रदर्शन प्रणाली पर प्रदर्शित की जाती है । पांच अंकक वीडर रूप मुद्रण यंत्र विन्यास और विन्यास पूर्व वैकल्पिक है । खनिज तेल की विशेषताएं 0.47 एम पी ए एस केगैसोलिन और इनकी सघनता 715.3 कि.ग्रा/मी. आसोपार जे 17.7 एम पी ए एस और सघनता 7749 कि० ग्रा०/मी और गैस तेल की चिपचिपाहट 3.92 एम पी ए एस और 20 ° से ० पर उपचारित 839 कि० ग्रा०/मी की सघनता है ।

[फा.सं ० डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 157 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1481 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

New Delhi , the 13th January, 2005

S.O. 536. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority alongwith the model approval certificate issued by the Netherlands Meetinstitutt, Hugo de Grootplein 1 . Dordrecht, The Netherlands , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards ofWeights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to Sub - section (3 ) and Sub-sections (7) and(8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Meter for Liquid other than Water model of series CM 3000 and CM 4000 manufactured by GEC Marconi Abbey Works Titchfield, Fareham, Hampshire PO 144 QA Great Britain marketed in India by M/s . Dynamark Engineers , 37, Whitehall 143 , August Kranti Marg, Kemps Corner , Mumbai -400 036 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13 / 2003/549,

TP 75 PS

The model (see the figure) is a meter for liquids other than water with a mechanical analog volume indicator and a pulser, working under maximum pressure of 10.5 bar, with a maximum flow rate of 4000 litre/ minute and mininium flow rate of 400 litre/minute minimum measured quantity 500 litre , of flanges 10 cm or 15 cm, belongingto accuracy class 0.5 . The principle of measurement is positive displacement. The measured quantity is indicated on a Master Load- II digital measuring and displaying system. Five digits Veeder Root printing mechanism and pre - setting mechanism are optional . The characteristics of mineral oil measured are Gasoline of viscosity 0.47 mPa.s and density 715.3 kg/ m³ , Isopar J ofviscosity 1.7 mPa.s and density 7749 kg/ m³ , Gas-oil of viscosity 3.92 mPa.s and density 839 kg/ m³ measured at 20°C.

[F. No. WM-21 (157)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 414GI /2005-3 1482

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

PART I-SEC 3 ( ) )

नई दिल्ली , 19 जनवरी , 2005

का०आ० 537.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) वाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा वाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्ता मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा,

अंतः अव, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेन्लोजिक आटोमेशन ( प्रा० ) लिमिटेड, १० 52, 5/डी, सर्वत्री ग्राहास अपार्टमेंट, गांधी स्ट्रीट, वेस्ट मासबलम , चेन्नई-600033 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्ाम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) बाले " एस एल एडब्ल्यू बो सो" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तौल सेतु के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सेन्लोजिक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिरो अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09/2003/583 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित कराती है ।

Senlogic

20980

SC 32

उक्त मांडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार का है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50,000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलान युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित जाधेपतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श खोलन परिणाम उपद‌र्शित करण है । उपकरण 220 से 230 चोल्ट तक और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाप पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिग प्लेट की मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सोलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपभाहा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी मामग्री में जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के पैसे हो मेक, सयार्थीता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा . या उससे आधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापनान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 5 रन से 100 टन ताह की अभिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2×10 या 5 ×10%, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक या शून्य के समतुल्प हैं ।

(फा. में, उन्न्यू एम-21 (252)/2002 ]

० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति तिर विधिक माप विज्ञान 1483 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

New Delhi , the 19th January, 2005

S.O. 537. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non -automatic ( Conversion kit for weighbridge type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SLA - WBC " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy Class -III) and with brand name " SENLOGIC " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Senlogic Automation (P) Limited, No. 52, 5 /D , Sarvasree Grahas Apartments, Gandhi Street. West Manbalam , Channai -600 033, Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /583.

Senlogic

SC32

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit for weighbridge type) with a maximum capacity of 50,000 kg and minimum capacity of 200 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 220 to 230 volts, 50-Hertz alternative current power supply,

In addition to scaling the staniping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 5 tonne to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 19. 2x10 or 5x10% , k being a positive or negative whole mumber or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which . the said approved model has been manufactured.

IF. No. WM-21 (252)/20021

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 1484

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( i))

नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी , 2005

का०आ ० 538.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेन्लोजिक आटोमेशन ( प्रा० ) लिमिटेड, नं० 52, 5/डी, सर्वश्री ग्राहासअपार्टमेंट, गांधी स्ट्रीट, वेस्ट मामबलम, चेन्नई -600033 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित एस एफ -32 डीजीटीसर सहित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस एल एडब्ल्यूवी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सेन्लोजिक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /582 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । Senlogic

20960

SF32

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50,000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकवलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 220 से 230 वोल्ट तक और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सोलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 252) /2002 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1485 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005 /माष 30 , 1926

New Delhi , the 19th January , 2005

S.O. 538. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity withthe provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Weighbridge type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SLA - WB " series with SF - 32 DIGITISER of medium accuracy (Accuracy Class- III) and with brand name " SENLOGIC " ( hercin referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Senlogic Automation (P) Limited, No. 52, 5/D , Sarvasree Grahas Apartments. Gandhi Street, West Mambalam , Channai -600 033, Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/582.

Senlogic

20.960

SF32

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge type) with a maximum capacity of 50,000 kg and minimum capacity of 200 kg . The verification scale interval ( c) is 10 kg. It has atare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 220 to 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternative current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximuun capacity in the range of 5 tonne to 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg or more and with ' e value of 1x10, 2x10 or 5x10", k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

IF No. WM- 21 (252)/20021

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY . Director of Legal Metrology 1486

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी , 2005

का०आ ० 539.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स डोडिया वेईंग टेक्नोलोजी, जी आई डी सी प्लाट सं ० 54 , हिम्मतनगर, साबरकण्ठा जिला -383001 गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तुला चौकी ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ऐरो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2004 / 256 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

ARROW

FULLY

ELECTRONIC WEIGH -BRIDGE

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( तुला चौकी ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30,000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा , उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 78 )/2001 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1487

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

[भाग 1 ]-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 19th January, 2005

S.O. 539. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy Class - III ) of AWC series with brand name " ARROW" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Dodia Weighing Technology. GIDC, Plot No. 54. Himatnagar, Sabarkanta District - 383 001 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/256;

FULLY

ELECTRONIC WEIGH - 100

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 30,000 kg and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 kg. It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result.The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply :

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e value of 5 kg or more and with' e' value 1-100 2x10 or 5x10% , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufacturedby the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

IF No. WM -211781/20011

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1488

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2005

का०आ० 540.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60। तथा प्राट और माय मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अत्तः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्न शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हम संसर डेल्टा इन्टरप्राइजेज , गोपाल बिल्डिंग, कचहरी गेट ( पश्चिमी ) के निकट, मेरठ कालिज के सामने , मेरठ-250001 , उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) वाले " ही ई एच " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडलका. जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डेल्टा है ( जिसे इसमें इसके ऐश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह आई एन डी/ 09/ 2004/376 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 ह‌र्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियोंका प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक को रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलो से 1000 किलो तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " का मान 1 × 10 , 2×10 या 5×10 के हैं , ' के' जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. मं. डल्ल्यू एम-21 ( 342)/2003 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति. निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1489 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माथ 30, 1926

New Delhi , the 4th February , 2005

S.O. 540.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " DEH " series of high accuracy (Accuracy Class - 11 ) and with brand name " DELTA" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Delta Enterprises , Gopal Building. Near Kutchery Gate ( W) , Opp . Meerut College, Meerut - 250 001 , Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/376;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 kg and minimum capacity of 1 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 20 kg. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 1000 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50000 for ' e' value of 100 g or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10 . 2x10 or 5x10%, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the sarne manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (342)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Lesgal Metrology 414 GI/2005-4 1490

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30. 1926

PART 11-S 3 (1)

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2005

की०आ० 541.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का. विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माय मानक (माँदनी का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात को संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता पनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हार मैसर्स डेल्टा इन्टरप्राइजेज, गोपाल बिल्डिंग, कचहरी गेट ( पश्चिमी ) के निकट, मेरठ कालिज के सामने, मेरठ-250001 उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथाधता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ही ईडब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (तोल मेतु प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डेल्टा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मांडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/ 09/ 2004/377 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड मेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सैतु प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30,000 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै। जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 चोल्ट और 50 ह‌र्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उस्दै विपिनांता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के "ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " का मान 1 × 10%, 2× 10" या 5× 10*, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 342)/2003]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामू‌र्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1491 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

New Delhi , the 4th February , 2005

S.O. 541. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge type ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy Class - III) of " DEW" series with brand name " DELTA " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s.Delta Enterprises , Gopal Building, Near Kutchery Gate ( W) , Opp . Meerut College , Meerut - 250 001 , Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/377;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge type) with a maximum capacity of 30,000 kg and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50- Hertz alternate current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5x10 , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (342)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1492

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2005

का०आ० 542.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा वाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डेल्टा एन्टरप्राइजेज, गोपाल बिल्डिंग , कचहरी गेट ( पश्चिमी ) के निकट, मेरठ कालिज के सामने , मेरठ-250001 उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डी ई सी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु के लिए कनवर्शन किट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डेल्टा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/378 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित कम्पाउण्ड लीवर प्रणाली के सिद्धांत पर कार्य करने वाला अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु के लिए कन्वर्शन किट) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30,000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सोलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. यां उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2× 10* या 5× 10%, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (342) /2003 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1493

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005 /माघ 30, 1926

New Delhi , the 4th February , 2005

S.O. 542. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of the Model of approval of non- automatic weighing instrument ( conversion kit for weighbridge) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy ( Accuracy Class- III) of " DEC" series with brand name " DELTA " ( hereinreferred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Delta Enterprises, Gopal Building, Near Kutchery Gate (W) , Opp. Meerut College, Meerut - 250001 , Uttar Pradesh and which isassigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/378;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based working on the principle of compound lever system non-automatic weighing instrument ( conversion kit for weighbridge ) with a nasiman capacity of 30,000 kg and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval ( c) is 5 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50-Hertz altemate current power supply:

In additionto scaling the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg or more and with e value 1x10 2× 10 or 5-10 k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which. the said approved Model has been manufactured

IF No. WM-21 (342)/2003

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY Director of Legal Metrology 1494

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART 11- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 फरवरी, 2005

का०आ० 543.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री उद्योग, नया सड़क, कटक-753002 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस यू ई पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " श्री उद्योग " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004 /57 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वाचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता । 150 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मीलवन्द भी किया जाएगा। और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करता है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी मामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 500 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×10% , 2× 10* या 5 × 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 119 )/2001 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1495

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

New Delhi , the7th February , 2005

S.O. 543. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below), is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SU - EP" series of high accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III) and with brand name " Shree Udyog " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Shrce Udyog, Naya Sadak , Cuttack- 753 002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2004/57

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 150 kg and minimum capacity of 400 g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 20 g. It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternative current power supply :

In additionto scaling the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 500 kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for' e value of 5 g or more and with e value of 1 × 10 . 2 × 10 or 5x10 . k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero . manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 119/2001 |

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1496

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/ MAGHA 30 , 1926

नई दिल्ली , 7 फरवरी , 2005

का०आ ० 544.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री उद्योग, नया सड़क, कटक -753002 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस यू- सी पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म के लिए कनवर्जन किट ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " श्री उद्योग " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2004/ 58 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म के लिए कनवर्जन किट ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2000 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 50 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक को अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 119 ) /2001 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1497 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th February, 2005

S.O. 544. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (conversion kit for platform) with " SU - CP" series belonging to medium accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III ) and with brand name " Shree Udyog" (hereinreferred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Shree Udyog , Naya Sadak , Cuttack- 753 002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/58 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( conversion kit for platform) with a maximum capacity of 2000 kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000 kg with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 50 g or more and with ' e ' value 1×10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 119)/2001 ] .

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 414 GI /2005-5 1498

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/ MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 7 फरवरी , 2005

का०आ० 5. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री उद्योग , नया सड़क, कटक -753002 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस यू- सी डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु के लिए कनवर्जन किट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " श्री उद्योग ' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2004/ 59 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

SHREE UDYOG

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु के लिए कनवर्जन किट प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30,000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 50 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 119 )/2001 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1499 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30 , 1926

New Delhi , the 7th February , 2005

S.O. 545. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( conversion kit for weighbridge ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy ( Accuracy Class III ) of " SU - CW " series with brand name " Shree Udyog " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Shree Udyog , Naya Sadak , Cuttack - 753 002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 2004 / 59 ;

SHREE UDYOG

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( conversion kit for weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 30,000 kg and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5 kg. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply ;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 50 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 119 )/ 2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , of Legal Metrology 1500

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/ MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 7 फरवरी , 2005

का०आ० 546.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री उद्योग , नया सड़क, कटक-753002 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस यू- ई डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " श्री उद्योग " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004 /60 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । SHREEUDYOG

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 25,000 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा। और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 50 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 119 ) /2001 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1501 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/पाघ 30, 1926

New Delhi , the 7th February , 2005

S.O. 546. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Goverunent hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (weighbridge type) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III ) of " SU -EW" series with brand name " Shree Udyog " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Shree Udyog . Naya Sadak , Cuttack- 753 002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /2004/60;

21000

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument ( weighbridge type ) with a maximum capacity of 25,000 kg and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 kg. It has atare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply ;

In addition to scaling the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 50 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg or more and with ' e' value 1× 10k, 2x10 or 5x10%, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21( 119)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , of Legal Metrology 1502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/ MAGHA 30 , 1926

1 पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2005

थिरुवरुर का.आ. 547.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में अदियाकामंगलम गैस एकत्र केन्द्र नारीमनम गैस एकत्र केन्द्र पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमिके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, विशेष तहसीलदार (आर.ओ.यू. ) एवं सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, 1842 , नीला दक्षिण गली , नागापट्टिनम -611001 ( तमिलनाडु ) को लिखित रूप में आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला तहसील

सर्वे नं.

ग्राम सं./ नाम

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

274-3

0.06.0 थिरुवरुर

274-4

0.02.0 46-अलीवलम (जारी)

274-5

0.02.0

274-6

0.04.5

274-7

0.06.0

274-8

0.05.0

275-1

0.01.0

सरकारी भूमि

275.2

0.10.0

275-3

0.05.0

275-4

0.03.5

276-1

0.02.0

सरकारी भूमि

276-2 0.16.5

276-3

0.00.5

सरकारी भूमि

278-2 0.14.0

278-3

0.10.5

0.05.5

279-1

0.17.0

279-2

0.01.5

1-1

सरकारी भूमि

1-2

0.10.0

2-1

0.06.0

2-2

0.10.5

2-4

0.05.0

2-5

0.09.5

7-1

0.06.0

7-2बी

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित

करने के लिए

क्षेत्रफल

(हेक्टेयर में )

0.06.5

46 -अलीवलम 129-6

थिरुवरुर

130-8

0.00.5

0.11.5

130-9ए

23-2

0.03.0

0.05.0

23-3

0.07.0

22-1

0.21.5

0.06.5

24-1

0.08

24-2बी

24-2सी 0.01.0

0.06.0

7-4

0.05.5

0.01.5

7-5

8-1

0.03.5

8-2

0.08.0

8-3

0.14.5

2.94.5

योग

221-बी 0.02.5 35 -सीमांगलम

सरकारी भूमि

0.09.0

218-1

218-2

0.04.0

0.18.5

218-4

0.01.0

218-7

सरकारी भूमि

0.02.0

199-3ए

सरकारी भूमि

0.11.5

273-1

0.02.0

273-2

0,02.0

274-2ए

0,00,5

199-1

0.02.0

199-3बी

0.02.0

199-3सी

0,00,5

199-4बी

सरकारी भूमि

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1503

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30, 1926

5 थिरुवरुर

0.05.0

थिरुवरुर 35- सीमांगलम 199-5बी

थिरुवरुर

0.00.5

थिरुवरुर 35- सीमांगलम 91-5

199-6

(जारी)

0.07.5

91-6

(जारी)

0.02.0 199-7

0.08.0

91-7

0.00.5 199-8 0.06.0

91-8

0.03.0 199-9 0.06.0

91-9

0.00.5

91-11

0.03.0 201-1

0.05.5

91-14

201-2बी

0.03.0

0.05.0

91-17

0.02.0 201-3सी 0.11.0

91-18 0.02.0 202-1

0.09.5

91-19

0.02.0 202-2 0.08.0

0.01.0

92/ए-9

0.07.5

203-1

0.01.0

92/ए-10 203-4

0.08.0

0.01.0

92/ए-14 129-1

0.01.0

92/ए- 15 -बी 0.02.0

सरकारी भूमि

92/ए- 16-बी 0.02.0 129-2 0.11.5

92/ए- 18 -बी 0.02.5 129-3 0.00.5

92/ए-20-बी 0.03.0 128-2 0.02.5

92/बी-1 0.04.5

0.04.0

128-3ए

80-1

0.01.5 128-3बी 0.05.0

80-2

0.01.5 128-4बी 0.03.0

80-3

0.02.0

0.02.5

128-4सी

80-4

0.02.0 128-5 0.04.0

80-5

0.03.0

0.07.5

128-6

80-6

0.01.0 128-7

0,10,0

80-7

0.00.5 127

0.04.0

80-8

0.05.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.01.5

80-9

0.07.0

103/बी-12

80-10 0.06.5 103/बी-13 0.01.0

80-11

0.02.5

0.00.5

103/बी-14

80-12

0.02.0

101

0.03.0

80-13

सरकारी भूमि

80-14

0.03.0 99-1

0.05.0

79-1

0.04.5

सरकारी भूमि

0.01,5

79-8ए

0.06.0

99-4

79-8बी 0.02.0 99-5

0.02.0

79-9

0.03.0 99-6

0.09.0

0.01.0

79-10ए

0.03.5

99-2जी

79-11

0.02.5 99-8

0.00.5

0.05.0

79-12

90-16

0.02.5

79-13ए 90-17 0.01.0

79-13बी 0.04.5 90-30 0.01.0

0.10.0

79-14ए

सरकारी भूमि

52-बी 0.05.0

0.00.5

91-3

सरकारी भूमि 91-4

0.02.5

40-1

0.10.0 1504

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

SCHEDULE

Distt.

0.06.0

40-3ए

थिरुवरुर थिरुवरुर

Tehsil Village No./ Name

Survey No.

40-3बी 0.00.5

35 - सीमांगलम (जारी)

Area to be Aquired for R.O.U. (in Hectares)

0.01.0

40-4ए

40-4बी 0.08.0

0.06.5

Thiru-

46-Avlivalam 129-6

Thiru-

40-7

0.05.0

0.00.5

varur

130-8

41-1

0.10.0

0.11.5

130-9A

0.02.0

41-4

0.03.0

23-2

41-5

0.00.5

0.05.0

23-3

0.07.0

22-1

0.01.0

41-6ए

0.21.5 41-6बी 0.00.5

0.06.5

24-1

45-13 0.03.0

0.08

24-2B

24-2C 0.01.0

0.03,5

38ए-1

0.06.0 G.P.

38ए-2 0.00.5

0.11.5

273-1

0.03.5

38ए-3

0.02.0 GP.

273-2

0.02.0

274-2A

0.02.0

38ए-12

0.06.0

274-3

सरकारी भूमि

274-4

0.02.0 36-31

0.00.5

0.02.0

274-5

218-5 0.03.5

0.04.5

274-6

131

0.01.0

0.06.0

274-7

274-8 0.05.0 योग

4.03.0

0.01.0 GP

275-1

[फा. सं. एल-14014/31/04- जी.पी. ]

0.10.0

275.2

0.05.0

275-3

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

0.03.5

275-4

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

0.02.0 GP

276-1

New Delhi , the 8th February, 2005

0.16.5

276-2

276-3

0.00.5 GP S.O. 547. Whereas it appearsto the Central

278-2 0.14.0

0.10.5

278-3

0.05.5

279-1

0.17.0

279-2

Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Adiyakamanglam Gas Collecting Station to Narimanam Gas Collecting Station pipeline project in the State of Tamilnadu , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;

0.01.5 GP

1-1

0.10.0

1-2

0.10.0

2-1

0,06,0

2-2

0.10.5

2-4

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire to Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

2-5

0.05.0

0.09.5

7-1

0,06,0

7-2B

0.05.5

7-4

0.01,5

7-5

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

0.03.5

8-1

0.08.0

8-2

0.14.5

8-3

2.94.5

Total

0.02.5 GP

221-B

35- Seman-

Thiru-

0.09.0

218-1

Thiru- varur

varur galam

0.04.0

218-2

0.18.5

218-4

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public. object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Special Tehsildar ( ROU) & Competent Authority, GAIL (India ) Limited, 1842 , Neela South Street , Nagapattinam -611001 (Tamilnadu ).

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30, 1926

1 Thiru-

218-7

35 -Seman-

0.01.0 GP Thiru- varur

Thiru- varur

varur

199-3A 0.02.0

galam

199-1 0.00.5

0.02.0

199-3B

199-3C 0.02.0

199-4B 0.00.5

199-5B 0.05.0

1996

0.07.5

199-7

0.08.0

199-8

0.06.0

199-9 0.06.0

201-1

0.05.5

201-28 0.05.0

201-2C 0.11.0

202-1

0.09.5

0.08.0

202-2

203-1

0.07.5

203-4

0.08.0

129-1

0.01.0 GP

0.11.5

129-2

129-3

0.00.5

128-2 0.02.5

0.04.0

128-3A

0.05.0

128-3B

0.03.0

128-4B

128-4C 0.02.5

0.04.0

128-5

128-6

0.07.5

128-7

0.10.0

127

0.04.0 GP

103 /B - 12 (0.07.0

103/B -13 0.01.0

103/B-14 0.00.5

101

0.02.0 GP

0.05.0 GP

99-1

0.06.0

99-4

99-5

0.02.0

99-6

0.09.0

99-2G 0.03.5

99-8

0.00.5

90-16 0.02.5

0.01.0

90-17

90-30 0.01.0 GP

91-3

0.00.5

91-4

0.02.5

91-5

0.00.5

91-6

0.02.0

91-7

0.00.5

91-8

0.03.0

91-9

0.00,5

0.03.0

91-11

91-14 0.03.0

91-17

0.02.0

414 Gl /2005-6

1505

91-18

0.02.0 Thiru- 35 -Seman-

varur

0.02.0

91-19

galam

92/A- 9 0.01.0

92/ A- 10 0.01.0

92/A- 14 0.01.0

92/A- 15 -B 0.02.0

92/A- 16-B 0.02.0

92/A- 18 -B 0.02.5

92/A-20 -B 0.03.0

0.04.5

92/B- 1

80-1

0.01.5

80-2

0.01.5

80-3

0.02.0

80-4

0.02.0

80-5

0.03.0

80-6

0.01.0

80-7

0.00.5

80-8

0.05.0

80-9

0.01,5

80-10

0.06.5

80-11

0.02.5

80-12

0.02.0

80-13 0.03.0

80-14

0.03.0

79-1

0.04.5

79-8A 0.01.5

79-8B 0.02.0

79-9

0.03.0

79-10A 0.01.0

79-11 0.02.5

79-12

0.05.0

0.02.5

79-13A

0.04.5

79-13B

79-14A 0.10.0

52-B

0.05.5 GP

40-1

0.10.0

0.06.0

40-3A

40-3B

0.00.5

40-4A 0.01.0

40-4B

0.08.0

40-7

0.05.0

0.10.0

41-1

41-4

0.02.0

41-5

0.00.5

41-6A 0.01.0

41-6B 0,00.5

0.03.0

45-13

0.03.5

38A- 1

0.00.5

38A-2

38A- 3

0.03.5

38A- 12 0.02.0 GP

0.00.5

36-31

0.03.5

218-5

131

0.01.0

Total 4.03.0

[F. No. L - 14014/31/04-G.P.J S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

1506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

1 नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 548.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में अदियाकामंगलम गैस एकत्र केन्द्र-नारीमनम गैस एकत्र केन्द्र पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइल बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, विशेष तहसीलदार (आर.ओ.यू. ) एवं सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, 1842, नीला दक्षिण गली , नागापट्टिनम-611001 ( तमिलनाडु ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला

तहसील

सर्वे नं.

ग्राम सं./ नाम

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में) 2

0.02.0 नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 44-अथिपुलियुर

0.04.0

253बी -2 253बी-3

सरकारी भूमि

253बी-6 0.02.5

0.00.5

253बी-9

0.01.0

253-बी-10

253बी-11 0.01.5

243-2

0.02.0

0.14.0

246-1

0.02.0

246-4

सरकारी भूमि

246-5 0.13.5

247-6

0.23.5

0.02.0

92-5

0.05.0

0.03.0

95-1

95-2

0.02.0

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 44- अथिपुलियुर 98

0.00.5 सरकारी भूमि

0.06.0

102-1

102-2

0.06.5

103

0.06.5

0.05.5

104-1ए

104-2

0.03.5

104-1सी 0,04,5

105-1

0.15.0

106-1

0.01.0

106-2 0.02.5

106-4

0.02.0

106-5 0.03.0

106-6

0.05.0

0.02.5

106-8

0.04.5

0.03.5

70-1

70-2

0.07.0

0.03.0

47-8

0.02.5

0.09.0

46-1ए

46-1बी 0.11.5

0.01.5

46-1सी

0.03.0

46-1डी

0.04.5

46-3ए

0.01.0

46-2ए

46-2बी 0.00.5

0.03.0

46-3बी

46-3सी 0.04.0

0,03,0

46-4ए

0.01.5

38-1ए

0.09.0

38-1बी

38-2

0.01.0

0.02.5

38-3

38-4बी 0.04.0

38-4बी 0.01.0

0.03.0

38-4ए/3

0.00.5

38-5ए

0.03.5

.सरकारी भूमि

0.03.5

31-4ए

0.07.0

31-4बी

30-1

0.06.0

0.04.5

30-2 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1507 भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

0.10.0

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 44-अथिपुलियुर 30-3

158-3

0.02.0

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर इरावनचेरी

30-5

0.05.5

सरकारी भूमि

0.04.0

30-6ए

142-26ए 0.01.0 30-6बी/1 0.02.5

142-26बी 0.02.0

0.01.0

30-6बी/2

138-1बी 0.01.0 30-7

0.00.5

138-2 0.09.0 29

0.03.0

138-3 0.03.0

सरकारी भूमि

138-4 0.02.5

0.05.5

27-1ए

138-5ए 0.03.0 26

0.02.0

138-5बी 0.01.0

सरकारी भूमि

138-6 0.01.0 25-2

0.35.0

138-7

0.01.5 20-1

0.04.5

138-8 0.03.5 20-2

0.06.0

0.02.5

138-9ए

20-3

0.05.0

138-9बी 0.01.0 20-4

0.03.5

138-15 0.01.0 21-6

0.02.0

136

0.02.5 21-7 0.03.0

सरकारी भूमि

135-1 0.18.0

0.03.0

1-2ए

204

0.06.0 1-2बी

0.04.5

सरकारी भूमि 1-5

0.03.0

203-1 0.06.0 1-6

0.02.5

203-2 0.01.0 1-7

0.01.0

195-1

0.05.0 1-8

0.08.5

195-4 0.09.0 योग

3.61.5

196-2 0.20.0 186

0.17.0

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर इरावनचेरी

197-1 0.09.0 185

0.04.0

0.06.0

197-2ए

सरकारी भूमि

197-3 0.11.0 184-1 0.11.0

198-1 0.01.0 184-2 0.03.0

0.05.0

198-2

159-2 0.01.0

34-2बी 0.01.0

सरकारी भूमि

1594 0.10.0

0.08.0

30-3बी

0.05.0

17-1

0.02.5 159-5ए

सरकारी भूमि 159-5बी 0.04.0

160-2 0.08.0

17-2ए 0.14.5

17-2बी 0.10.5 160-3 0.03.5

160-4

17-3

0.01.0

0.03.5

160-5 0.03.5

0.13.5

18-2

160-6

0.06.0

16-2

0.16.5 160-7 0.00.5

0.00.5 160-8 0.01.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.01.0 158-1 0.02.0

सरकारी भूमि

सरकारी भूमि 1508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

5 11-2

0.01.0

इरावनचेरी

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुलर

302

25-अगर-

0.14.0

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर

12-2

0.13.0

0.01.0

कडम्बनुर 301 12-3

0.01.5

सरकारी भूमि 12-5

300

0.04.0

0.15.5

299

0.05.0

0.27.0 5-2ए

298 5-2बी

0.05.0

0.03.0 3-1डी

सरकारी भूमि

0.04.5

230-1 0.14.5 3-1ई

0.05.5

230-2 0.01.0

0.16.5

3-1एफ

230.3

0.07.5

0.09.0

3-2ए

0.02.0

230-4 3-2बी 0.08.0

योग

1.59.0

0.04.0

3-3ए1

0.08.5

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 20- अनाईमंगलम 94

0.01.0

3-302

सरकारी भूमि

0.18.0

0.42.0

96 योग

3.82.5

245-1

0.04.5

0.07.0

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 27- कुरूमननगुडी 97-4बी

245-2

0.24.5 97-5

0.01.5

244-1 0.03.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.05.0

244-2

0.06.0

97-7ए

0.23.5

247 97-7बी 0.09.0

249-1 0.01.0

0.01.5

97-8

सरकारी भूमि

249-2 0.04.5 96-1

0.01.5

249-3 0.12.5

सरकारी भूमि

0.15.0

2494 96-2

0.11.5

249-5 0.00.5

0.01.0

98-302

0.00.5

252-1 98-3बी 0.04.0

0.00.5

252-2 98-3सी 0.16.0

0.04.5

253-1

0.09.0

91-1

0.03.5

253-2 91-2

0.01.0

0.12.5

253-3

सरकारी भूमि

269-1

0.19.0

0.02.0

91-3ए

269-2 0,00,5 90-3

0.08.5

271-1

0.00.5 89

0.21.0

सरकारी भूमि 88-1

0.23.0

0.16.5

271-2

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 20 - अनाईमंगलम

88-2

0.01.0

273-3 0.11.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.03.0

272-5 87-6

0.10.0

0.01.0

272-6 योग

1.34.5

सरकारी भूमि 305

0.01.0

25-अगर-

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर

0.14.5

272-11

0.15.0

कडम्बनुर 306

272-12 0.01.0 307

0.28.0

सरकारी भूमि 308

0.18.0

267

0.06.0 304

0.11.5

सरकारी भूमि [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30 , 1926

1509 1

0.01.0

17डी-1

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 20- अनाईमंगलम

0.22.0

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 26-ओक्कुर 221-2

सरकारी भूमि

221-3

0.03.5

0.00.5

17डी-2

221-4 0.02.0 17डी-5 0.22.5

218-2 0.20.0 231-1 0.00.5

0.06.0

218-3ए

सरकारी भूमि

218-3बी 0.01.0 231-2

0.00.5

209-1 0.00.5 231-4 0.05.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.20.0

232-1

0.04.5

209-2ए 232-2 0.17.0

209-2बी 0.04.5 232-3 0.06.0

210-1 0.01.5 232-4 0.02.5

सरकारी भूमि 242-2 0.04.5

210-2 0.03.0 योग

3.19.0

216-1

0.06.5 286-2 0.03.0

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 26- ओक्कुर

216-2 0.07.0

सरकारी भूमि

216-3

0.11.0 286-10 0.01.0

216-4

0.01.0 284-4 0.11.0

211

0.10.0

0.02.0

278-1ए

213

0.03.5 278-1बी 0.02.0

212-2

0.02.0 278-3

0.03.5

212-3

0.09.5 278-4 0.05.5

212-4 0.05.5

0.03.5

278-5

0.24.5

131

278-6

0.02.0

132

0.19.5

सरकारी भूमि

129

0.03.0

0.01.0

277-2ए

सरकारी भूमि

0.13.0

277-2बी

126-1बी 0.06.5

0.01.0

277-3ए

126-2 0.01.0 277-4 0.03.0

सरकारी भूमि 277-5 0.12.0

127-1

0.22.0 276

0.03.0

0.05.5

127-2

सरकारी भूमि

112

0.17.0 255-1 0.13.0

111-2 0.10.0 255-2 0.01.0

0.32.0

110

255-3

0.10.0

107-2 0.01.0 255-4

0.05.5

108-1 0.02.0 255-5 0.01.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.26.0

254-1

108-2 0.02.0 253-1बी 0.17.0

सरकारी भूमि 234

0.02.0

0.01.0

109

सरकारी भूमि

71-1

0.02.5

0.03.5

220-4ए

71-2

0.07.5 220-4बी 0.05.0

0.07.5

71-3

220-4सी 0.05.5

71-4

0.03.5 1510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

74-3

0.13.5 नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 26-ओक्कुर

0.09.5

75-2

0.02.0

75-3

0.01.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.23.5

78-1

0.02.0

78-2

0.02.0

78-3

0.02.0

81-1

0.04.0

81-2

0.02.0

0.24.0

81-3ए

82-2

0.22.0

0.01.5

20-1ए

20-1-बी 0.13.5

20-1सी 0.02.5

20-2

0.00.5

सरकारी भूमि

0.09.5

20-3ए

5.83.5

योग

0.03.0

110

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 27 - वेनकीदंगल

103-1बी 0.02.5

सरकारी भूमि

104-1 0.07.0

104-2 0.09.5

102

0.04.5

97-2

0.15.0

0.05.0

95-1

95-6

0.01.0

0.08.0

96-1

96-2

0.01.0

96-3

0,20.5

0.04.5

सरकारी भूमि

93-1

0.16.5

93-2

0.01.0

0.01.5

सरकारी भूमि

73-1

0.05.0

73-2

0.00.5

0.02.0

सरकारी भूमि

40-4

0.02.0

0.01.5

सरकारी भूमि

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] 2

0.10.0

नागापट्टिनम कीलवेलुर 27- वेनकीदंगल 38-1ए

38-1बी 0.11.5

0.03.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.21.0

34-2

0.11.5

0.01.0

34-3

सरकारी भूमि

0.10.0

28-1ए

0.07.5

33-2ए1

0.03.5

33-22

33-2बी 0.15.5

32-2

0.01.5

13-1

0.07.0

0.15.5

13-2

0.02.0

13-3

0,11,0

13-4

0.01.5

सरकारी भूमि

0.14.5

0.02.5

4-1ए

2.61.5

योग

154

0.05.0

नागापट्टिनम नागापट्टिनम 120- कुथलम

सरकारी भूमि

0.01.0

155-5

155-6 0.05.0

152

0.02.0

सरकारी भूमि

146-5 0.10.0

0.00.5

146-10

147-1

0.01.5

147-2 0.12.5

147-3 0.06.5

0.08.5

147-5

131

0.07.0

0.08.5

130-1ए

130-1बी 0.08.0

130-2 0.01.5

132-2 0.15.0

0,20.0

133-3

0.01.5

134-1

0.05.0

134-3

134-4 0.01.0 1511 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/भाष 30, 1926

134-6

0.24.0

नागापट्टिनम नागापट्टिनम 120- कुथलम

MineralsPipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein. 135-39 0.08.5

123-1 0.14.0

0.10.5

123-2ए

123-2बी 1 0.06.5

0.03.5

123-2बी2

124-11 0.00.5

0.01.5

124-102

Anyperson interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Special Tehsildar ( ROU) & Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, 1842, Neela South Street, Nagapattinam-611001 (Tamilnadu) .

0.04.5

SCHEDULE-

124-1बी

0.06.0

124-1सी

Distt. Tehsil Village No./ Name

Survey No.

125-2बी 0.04.0

125-2सी 0.04.0

Area tobe Acquired for R.O.U. ( in Hectares) 125-2डी1 0.01.0

0.04.0

125-2डी2

Keel- 44-Athi- 253/B-2 0.02.0

Naga-

125-21 0.03.5

0,04.0 GP

253B-3

velur

pattinam

puliyur

125-22 0.01.0

253B-6 0.02.5

253B-9 0.00.5 126-11 0.16.0

253 -B- 10 0.01.0 126-1बी 0.04.0

253B-11 0.01.5 121

0.03.0

243-2 0.02.0

सरकारी भूमि

246-1

0.14.0

0.01.0

20-1

246-4

0.02.0 GP

सरकारी भूमि

0.13.5

246-5

0.26.0

20-5बी

247-6 0.23.5

0.01.0

26-5ए

0.02.0 26-5बी 0.18.0

0.05.0

92-5

0.03.0

95-1

26-6

0.05.5

95-2

0.02.0 26-7

0.03.0

0.00.5 GP 26-8

0,02.0

0,06,0

102-1

योग

2.96.5

0.06,5

102-2

103

0.06.5 [फा. सं. एल-4014/31/'04-जी.पी. ]

0,05.5

104-1A

104-2 0.03.5 एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

0.04.5

104-1C

New Delhi , the 8th February, 2005

0.15.0

105-1

106-1 0.01.0

106-2

0.02.5

106-4

0.02.0

0.03.0

106-5

0.05.0

106-6

S.O. 548. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Adiyakamanglam Gas Collecting Station to Narimanam Gas Collecting Station pipeline project in the State ofTamilnadu, apipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India ) Limited;

0.02.5

106-8

0.04.5

0.03.5

70-1

0.07.0

70-2

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

0.03.0

47-8

0.02.5

0.09.0

46-1A

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and 1512

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 1

5 Keel- 44-Athi- 46-1B

Naga-

0.11.5

159-4 0.10.0

Naga- Keel- Irvanchery

46-1C

pattinam velur

0.01.0

puliyur

159-5A 0.05.0

pattinam velur

46-1D 0.03.0

0.04.0

159-5B

46-3A 0.04.5

160-2

0.08.0 46-2A 0.01.0

160-3 0.03.5 46-2B 0.00.5

0.03.5

160-4

46-3B 0.03.0

160-5 0.03.5 46-3C

0.04.0

160-6

0.06.0 46-4A 0.03.0

160-7

0.00.5 38-1A 0.01.5

160-8 0.01.0 38-1B 0.09.0

158-1

0.02.0 GP 38-2

0.01.0

158-3

0.02.0 GP 38-3

0.02.5

0.01.0

142-26A

38-4B 0.04.0

142-26B 0.02.0 38-4C 0.01.0

138-1B 0.01.0 38-4A/3 0.03.0

138-2 0.09.0 38-5A 0.00.5

138-3 0.03.0 37

0.03.5 GP

138-4 0.02.5 31-4A 0.03.5

138-5A 0.03.0 31-4B 0.07.0

138-5B 0.01.0 30-1

0.06.0

138-6

0.01.0 30-2

0.04.5

138-7 0.01.5 30-3

0.03.5

0.10.0

138-8

0.02.5

138-9A

30-5

0.05.5

0.01.0

138-9B

30-6A 0.04.0

138-15 0.01.0

0.02.5

30-6B/ 1

136

0.02.5 GP 30-6B/2 0.01.0

0.18.0

135-1

30-7

0.00.5

204

0.06.0 GP 29

0.03.0 GP

0.06.0

203-1

27-1A 0.05.5

0.01.0

203-2

0.02.0 GP

0.05.0

195-1

25-2

0.35.0

0.09.0

195-4

20-1

0.04.5

0.20.0

196-2

20-2

0.06.0

0.09.0

197-1

20-3

0.05.0

20-4

0.03.5

0.06.0

197-2A

21-6

0.02.0

197-3 0.11.0 21-7

0.03.0 GP

0.01.0

198-1

1-2A

0.03.0

0.05.0

198-2

0.01.0

0.04.5

1-2B

34-2B

1-5

0.03.0

0.08.0

30-3B

1-6

0.02.5

0.02.5 GP

17-1

1-7

0.01.0

0.14.5

17-2A

1-8

0.08.5

0.10.5

17-2B

Total 3.61.5

17-3

0.01.0

0.17.0

18-2

0.13.5 Naga- Keel- Iravanchery 186

185

0.04.0 GP

pattinam velur

0.16.5

16-2

184-1

0.11.0

0.00.5 GP 184-2

0.03.0

0.01.0 GP 159-2

0.01.0 GP

11-2

0.01.0 1513 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

0.13.0

245-2

0.24.5

Keel- 20-Anai-

Iravanchery

Naga-

12-2

Naga-

Keel-

12-3

0.01.5

244-1 0.03.0 pattinam velur

pattinam velur mangalam

0.04.0

12-5

0.05.0

244-2

5-2A 0.05.0

247

0.23.5

0.05.0

5-2B

249-1 0.01.0 GP 3-1D

0.04.5

249-2

9.04.5

005.5

3-1E

0.12.5

249-3

0.16.5

3-1F

0.15.0

2494

3-2A

0.09.0

249-5 0.00.5 3-2B

0.08.0

0.00.5

252-1

3-3A1 0.04.0

0.00.5

252-2

0.01.0

3-3A2

0.04.5

253-1

0,18.0

0.03.5

253-2

3.82.5

Total

0.12.5

253-3

27 -Kuruma- 97-4B

Keel-

Naga-

269-1 0.19.0 97-5

0.01.5 GP

velur

pattinam

nangudy

269-2

0.00.5 97-7A 0.06.0

271-1

0.00.5 GP 97-7B 0.09.0

271-2 0.16.5 97-8

0.01.5 GP

273-3 0.11.0

0.01.5 GP

96-1

0.03.0

272-5

96-2

0.11.5

272-6 0.01.0 GP 98-3A2 0.01.0

0.14.5

272-11

0.04.0

98-3B

0.01.0 GP

272-12 98-3C 0.16.0

267

0.06.0 GP 91-1

0.09.0

0.01.0 GP

17D- 1

91-2

0.01.0 GP

0.00.5

17D-2 91-3A 0.02.0

0.22.5

17D-5

0.08.5

90-3

231-1 0.00.5 GP 89

0.21.0

0.00.5

231-2

0.23.0

88-1

0.05.0

231-4

88-2

0.01.0 GP

0.20.0

232-1

87-6

0.10.0

0.17.0

232-2

1.34.5

Total

232-3 0,06,0

0.01.0

Naga-

25 -Agaraka- 305

Keel-

232-4 0.02.5

0.15.0

dambanur 306

velur

pattinam

0.04.5

242-2

0.28.0

307

3.19.0

Total

0.18.0

308

0.03.0 GP

Kil- 26-Okkur 286-2

Naga-

304

0.11.5

286-10 0.01.0

velur

pattinam

302

0.14.0

0.11.0

284-4

301

0.01.0 GP

278-1A 0.02.0

0.15.5

300

0.02.0

278-1B

0.27.0

299

278-3 0.03.5 298

0.03.0 GP

278-4

0.05.5 230-1

0.14.5

0.03.5

278-5

230-2

0.01.0

278-6

0.02.0 GP

0.07.5

230.3

277-2A 0.01.0 230-4 0.02.0

277-2B 0.13.0 Total 1.59.0

277-3A 0.01.0 Keel- 20-Anai- 94

0.08.5 GP

Naga-

277-4 0.03.0

0.42.0

velur

pattinam

mangalam 96

277-5 0.12.0 245-1 0,04.5

414 Gl/ 2005-7 1514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

1 26-Okkur 276

0.03.0 GP Kil-

Naga-

255-1

0.13.0

pattinam

pattinam velur

0.01.0

255-2

255-3 0.10.0

255-4 0.05.5

255-5 0.01.0

254-1 0.26.0

0.17.0

253-1B

234

0,02,0 GP

0.03.5

220-4A

0.05.0

220-4B

0.05.5

220-4C

221-2

0,22,0

0.03.5

221-3

221-4 0.02.0

0,20.0

218-2

218-3A 0.06.0

0.01.0

218-3B

0.00.5 G.P

209-1

0.04.5

209-2A

209-2B 0.04.5

210-1 0.01.5 GP

0.03.0

210-2

0.06.5

216-1

0.07.0

216-2

216-3 0.11.0

0.01.0

216-4

211

0.10.0

213

0.03.5

212-2 0.02.0

0.09.5

212-3

0.05.5

212-4

0.24.5

131

0.19.5

132

0.03.0 G.P

129

0.06.5

126-1B

0.01.0 GP

126-2

0.22.0

127-1

0.05.5

127-2

0.17.0

112

0.10.0

111-2

0.32.0

110

0.01.0

107-2

0.02.0 G.P

108-1

108-2 0.02.0 GP

0.01.0

109

0.02.5

71-1

0.07.5

71-2

0.07.5

71-3

0.03.5

71-4

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

5 2

26-Okkur

Kil-

74-3

0.13.5

0.09.5 velur

0.02.0

75-2

0.01.0 GP

75-3

0.23.5

0.02.0

78-1

0.02.0

78-2

0.02.0

78-3

0.04.0

81-1

0.02.0

81-2

0.24.0

81-3A

0.22.0

82-2

0.01.5

20-1A

0.13.5

20-1B

0.02.5

20-1C

20-2

0.00.5 GP

0.09.5

20-3A

5.83.5

Total

0.03.0 27-Venki- 110

0.02.5 GP

103-1B

dangal

0.07.0

104-1

0.09.5

104-2

0.04.5

102

0.15.0

97-2

0.05.0

95-1

0.01.0

95-6

0.08.0

96-1

0.01.0

96-2

0.20.5

96-3

0.04.5 G.P

0.16.5

93-1

0.01.0

93-2

0.01.5 GP

-0.05.0

73-1

0.00.5

73-2

0.02.0 GP

0.02.0

40-4

0.01.5 GP

0.10.0

38-1A

0.11.5

38-1B

0.03.0 GP

0.21.0

0.11.5

34-2

34-3

0.01.0 GP

0.10.0

28-1A

33-2A1 0.07.5

33-2A2 0.03.5

0.15.5

33-2B

0.01,5

32-2

0.07.0

13-1 1515

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

5 2

0.15.5

26-6

0.05.5 13-2

Kiel-

120-Kuth-

Naga- Naga-

Naga-

0.02.0

13-3

alam

26-7

27-Venki- dangal

velur

0.03.0 pattinam

pattinam

0.11.0

13-4

26-8

0.02.0 8

0.01.5 GP

2.96.5

Total

0.14.5

[F. No. L- 14014/31 /04 -G.P. ] 4-1A 0.02.5

S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

Total 2.61.5

नईदिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2005 154

120-Kuth-

0.05.0 GP

Naga-

0.01.0

155-5

alam

pattinam

155-6 0.05.0

152

0.02.0 GP

146-5 0.10.0

का.आ. 549.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में सेमकोर- केशवराय पाटन पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

146-10 0.00.5

147-1

0.01.5

147-2 0.12.5

147-3

0.06.5

147-5 0.08.5

0.07.0

131

0.08.5

130-1A

130-1B 0.08.0

0.01.5

130-2

132-2 0.15.0

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

133-3 0.20.0

0.01.5

134-1

134-3 0.05.0

134-4 0.01.0

134-6 0.24.0

135-3D 0.08.5

123-1

0.14.0

123-2A 0.10.5

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख सेजिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री अन्तर सिंह नेहरा, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, सी-6, 107, कमल अपार्टमेंट, सवाई जयसिंह हाईवे, बनीपार्क, जयपुर, राजस्थान को लिखित रूप में आपेक्षा भेज सकेगा ।

123-2B1 0.06.5

123-2B2 0.03.5

अनुसूची

124-1A1 0.00.5

जिला तहसील गांव सर्वे नं. " 124-1A2 0.01.5

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए 124-1B 0.04.5

124-1C 0.06.0

क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में) 125-2B 0.04.0

0.04.0

125-2C

463

कोटा

गांवडी

0.0720

लाडपुरा

125-2D1 0.01.0

125-2D2 0.04.0

758

0.3960 125-2E1 0.03.5

751

0.0420 125-2F2 0.01.0

745

0.0020 126-1A1 0.16.0

746

0.0980 126-1B 0.04.0

747

0.1740 121

0.03.0 GP

748

0.0920 20-1

0.01.0 GP

738

0.3520 20-5B 0.26.0

734

26-5A

0.0380

0.01.0

26-5B

729

0.18.0

0.3360 1516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

Kota कोटा

गांवडी 723

0.0100 लाडपुरा

724

0,2780

0.1560

725

665

0.0150

752

0.0150

293

0.0720

292

0,0600

2.2080

योग

[फा. सं. एल-14014/8/04-जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th February, 2005

S.O. 549. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Samcore to Keshav Rai Patan pipeline project in the State of Rajasthan, apipeline shouldbe laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;

And,whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section (1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Shri Antar Singh Nehra, Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, C-6 , 107 , Kamal Appartment, Sawai Jai Singh N.H. , Banipark, Jaipur , Rajasthan .

SCHEDULE

Distt. Tehsil Village Survey

No.

Area to be Aquired for R.O.U. ( in

जिला

Hectares)

463

Kota

0,0720

Gavdi

Ladpura

758

0.3960

751

0.0420

745

0.0020

बून्दी

746

0,0980

747

0.1740

748

0.0920

738

0.3520

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

0.0380

734

Ladpura Gavdi

729

0.3360

0.0100

723

0.2780

724

0.1560

725

665

0.0150

752

0.0150

0.0720

293

0,0600

292

Total 2.2080

[FNo. L- 14014/8/04-G.P.J

S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 550.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में सेमकोर- केशवराय पाटन पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त. पाइपलाइल बिछाए जाने का प्रस्तात्र है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिमें उपयोगके अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , श्री अन्तर सिंह नेहरा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, सी-6, 107, कमल अपार्टमेंट, सवाई जयसिंह हाईवे, बनीपार्क, जयपुर, राजस्थान को लिखित रूप में आपेक्षा भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तहसील

गाँव सर्वे नं. आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करनेके लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में)

1.0440

749

केशवराय गुडली

0.0840 पाटन

748

0.2640

735

0,2160

734

0,2400

733 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30 , 1926

1 केशवराय

732

बून्दी

0.2520

गुडली

बून्दी

पाटन

730

0.1980

727

0.3200

722

0.0480

0.2640

676/769

674

0.0660

670

0.1800

672

0.4080

673

0,1240

योग

3.3480

501

0.0040

499

0,5120

498

0.0720

496

0.0120

495

0.0240

493

0,0660

494

0.2760

478

0,0360

471

0.1080

460

0.0240

457

0.1020

458

0.1020

425

0.0120

453

0.1500

452

0.3180

450

0,0360

429

0.1420

428

0.0020

619

0.0780

622

0.5440

624

0.0300

625

0.0180

627

0.0980

627/2562 0.3540

626

0.0020

417

0.0360

416

0.3180

633

0,0600

645

0.4540

646

0.0120

647

0.0120

395

0.4380

394

0.0780

693

0.0700

668

0,0360

669

1.5240

670

0.1020

671

0.0360

0.0180

617

1517 2

699

केशवराय केशवराय

0.1840 पाटन

पाटन

698

0.3780

697

0.1380

696

0.0380

692

0.0980

728

0.2400

729

0.2460

730

0.1380

731

0.1180

732

0.2180

733

0.0400

745

0.0180

760

0.0320

759

0.5360

786

0,0580

809

0.0180

810

0,0300

811

0,0380

812

0.0320

813

0.4020

853/2519 0.0400

854

0.4200

871

0.0540

883

0.0120

882

0.3040

881

0.2580

880

0.7440

885

0.1180

890

0.0300

891

0,0320

879

0.1320

878

0.1220

0.1200

877

876

0.1200

खाली

0.0600

875

0.2480

874

0.1500

873

0.0720

0.1500

872

869

0.0480

870

0.0140

योग 12.5640 [फा. सं . एल-14014/8/04-जी.पी . ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव 1518

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

1 New Delhi , the 8th February, 2005

Bundi S.O. 550.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Samcore to Keshav Rai Patan pipeline project in the State of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;

And , whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the landto the Shri Antar Singh Nehra, Competent Authority , GAIL ( India) Limited, C -6 , 107 , Kamal Appartment, Sawai Jai Singh N.H. , Banipark, Jaipur , Rajasthan .

SCHEDULE

Tehsil

Distt.

Village Survey No.

Area to be Acquired for R.O.U. ( in Hectares)

749

1,0440 Bundi Keshav Rai Gudli

0.0840

748

Patan

735

0.2640

734

0.2160

733

0.2400

0.2520

732

730

0.1980

0.3200

727

0.0480

722

0.2640

676/769

0,0660

674

0.1800

670

672

0.4080

673

0.1240

3.3480

Total

501

0.0040

Keshav

0.5120

499

Rai Patan

Bundi Keshav Rai Patan

498

0.0720

0.0120

496

495

0.0240

493

0.0660

0.2760

494

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

478

0.0360 Keshav Rai Keshav

471

Patan Rai Patan

0.1080

460

0.0240 (Contd.)

457

0.1020

458

0.1020

425

0.0120

453

0.1500

452

0.3180

0.0360

450

429

0.1420

428

0.0020

619

0.0780

622

0.5440

0.0300

624

625

0.0180

627

0,0980

0.3540

627/2562

626

0.0020

417

0.0360

0.3180

416

633

0.0600

645

0.4540

0.0120

646

647

0.0120

395

0.4380

0.0780

394

0.0700

693

668

0.0360

669

1.5240

670

0.1020

0,0360

671

617

0.0180

699

0.1840

0.3780

698

697

0.1380

696

0.0380

692

0.0980

0.2400

728

0.2460

729

730

0.1380

0.1180

731

0.2180

732

733

0.0400

745

0.0180

0.0320

760

0.5360

759

0.0580

786

809

0.0180

810

0,0300

0.0380

811 1519 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

अनुसूची

812

0,0320

Bundi Keshav Rai Keshav

जिला तहसील

ग्राम खसरा नं.

Rai Patan 813

0.4020

Patan

853/2519 0.0400

(Contd.)

854

0.4200

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर्स में ) 871

0.0540

883

0.0120

कोटा

नया नोहरा

0,0020 882

0.3040

लाडपुरा

0.6580

0.2580

881

880

0.7440

0.3000 885

0.1180

0.3820 890

0.0300

0.1580

891

0.0320

0.2760

879

0.1320

0.2700

878

0.1220

0.1380

106

877

0.1200

0.0660

876

0.1200

0.0480

0.0600

Empty

0.4560

105

875

0.2480

0.1920

104

0.1500

874

103

0.0360 873

0.0720

0.2940 872

0.1500

0.0480

869

0.0340 870

0.0140

0.3440 Total 12.5640

0.0780 [F. No. L - 14014/8/04-G.P.J

0.0960

59/1

0.0960 S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

0.2040 नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2005

0.1320

0.1260

0.0780

0.0840

का.आ. 551.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में सेमकोर से केशवराय पाटन पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0.0240

0.0300

19/1

0.5940

0.1860 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

0.1920

5.5440

योग

कोटा

0.0670

बोरखंडी

लाडपुरा

0.3650

0.1140 अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

0.0720

189/481 0.0360

0.1560

189

191

1.1460

1.9560

योग

0.0270

कोटा

603

लाडपुरा अर्जुनपुरा

604

0.0320

605

0.0250 कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री अन्तर सिंह नेहरा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, सी -6, 107 , कमल अपार्टमेंट, सवाई जयसिंह एन. एच, बनीपार्क, जयपुर, राजस्थान को लिखित रूप में आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा । 1520

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

1 कोटा

लाडपुरा

0.3840

कोटा अर्जुनपुरा 606

636

0.1140

574

0.0120

573

0.2640

572

0,2400

571

0.3000

565

0.4560

566

0.0300

551

0,2340

कोटा

550

0.3000

549

0.0360

0.8160

0.0270

0.0150

0.0600

योग

3.3720

कोटा

566

रंगतालाब

0.0300

लाडपुरा

उर्फ

565/611 0,0900

565

0,2760

कालातालाब

564

0.4920

562

0.0600

561

0,0420

560

0.0960

546

0.1680

555

0.0480

554

0.7480

553

0,0020

299

0.0900

कोटा

266

0.0240

0.5340

261

कोटा

0.0720

262

256

0.3780

0.2220

255मि०

255

0.2040

255मि० 0.2040

251

0.0720

250

0.0600

0.2280

243

244

0,3100

249/601 0.0020

0.2640

245/642

योग 4.7160

कोटा

सोगरिया 435/469 0,0360

लाडपुरा

435

0.1320

434

0.3720

431

0,6080

[PART I-SEC. 3 (ii)] 2

432

सोगरिमा-

लाडपुरा

0.0040 जारी

414

0.0240

खाली 0.0120

412

0.0600

खाली

0.0240

410/598 0.0200

410

0.0040

1.2960

योग

657

0.2580 लाडपुरा किशनपुरा

656

तकिया

0.1140

659

0.0540

660

0.0360

661

0.0120

662

0.1200

631

0.0300

632

0,3000

633

0.1680

631

0,0480

626

0.0290

खाली

0,0335

0.0335

625

623

0.6120

606

0.3360

604

0.0540

0.4320

601

591

0.4220

592

0.0040

3.0960

योग

1074

0.0120 चन्द्रेसल

लाडपुरा

योग

0.0120 रोटेदा

0.0900

324

लाडपुरा

0.0100

323

326

0.3480

0.2700

325

329

0.0100

0.0480

322

320

0.2160

0.0180

312

0,2460

304/372

304

0.5640

0.1440

302

0.0120

301

650

0.1020

610

0.0020

0.0400

611

612

0.1020 1521 [भाग II- खष्ठ 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/ माब 30, 1926

623

गावंडी

कोटा

रोटेदा 619

0.0060

0.1980 लाडपुरा

लाडपुरा

0,0480

622

0.1800 618

621

0.0180 617

0,2880

609

0.0720 616

0.0480

586

0.6840 615

0.0420

0.1740

189

614

0.0720

191

0,0420 613

0,1320

0.1500

188

604

0,0780

186

0.0240 588

0.0960

185

0.1920 590

0.3480

183

0.0240 589

0.0120

184

0.1500 591

0.0100

0.1980

181547 574

0,0420

155

0.2520 575

0.1500

156

0.1320 573

0.0540

157

0.0480 571

0.1440

170

0.0600 572

0.0600

169

0.0780 551

0,0600

162

0.0120 544

0,7020

206

0.3780 529

0.3660

168

0.0780 528

0.1500

167

0.0780 523

0,0540

164

0.0120 515

0,0900

166

0.0840 516

0.5280

165

0.0480 517

0.1920

0.1560 योग 5.9940

0.1260

0,7560 कोटा

गंगायचा खाली 0.0300

लाडपुरा

खाली 0,3900

4.4040

योग

खाली 0.0480

[फा. सं. एल-14014/8/04- जी.पी. ] 586

0.0480

591

0.2340

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव 579

0.2760

NewDelhi, the 8th February, 2005 580

0.3720

581

0.0180

567

-0.0540

549 0,5100

543 0,4740

S.O. 551. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthetransportation ofpetroleum gas through Samcore to Keshav Rai Patantan pipelinepipeli project in the State of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;

0.0240

544-

505/1 0.1320

512

0.2160

506

0.1140

And,whereas itappears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under whichthe saidpipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

507

0,0900

Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred 509

0.2580

by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and 510

0,1380

MineralsPipelines (Acquisition ofRight ofUser in Land)

Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby

3,4260

योग

declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein.

414 GI/2005-8 1522

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

Kota Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Antar Singh Nehra, Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, C-6, 107 , Kamal Apartment, Sawai Jai Singh N.H. , Banipark, Jaipur, Rajasthan .

SCHEDULE

Distt. Tehsil Village Survey No.

Area to be Aquired for R.O.U. (in Hectares)

0.0020 Kota Ladpura Naya Nohara 77

0.6580

0,3000

0.3820

0.1580

0,2760

0.2700

0.1380

106

0.0660

0.0480 :

0,4560

105

104

0,1920

103

0,0360

0.2940

0.0340

0.3440

0,0780

0.0960

0,0660

59/1

0,2040

0.1320

0.1260

0.0780

0.0840

0.0240

0,0300

19/1

0.5940

0.1860

0.1920

5.5440

Total

Kota

0.0670

Kota Ladpura Borkhandi

0.3650

0.1140

0.0720

0.0360

189/481

0.1560

189

1.1460

191

1.9560

Total

603

0.0270 Kota Ladpura Arjunpura

604

0.0320

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

0.0250 Ladpura Arjunpura 605

606

Contd.

0.3840

636

0.1140

574

0.0120

573

0.2640

572

0.2400

571

0.3000

0,4560

565

0,0300

566

0.2340

551

0.3000

550

0.0360

549

0.8160

0.0270

0.0150

0.0600

3.3720

Total

566

0.0300

Kota Ladpura Rangtalav

565/611 0.0900 Urf

0,2760

565

Kalatalav

0.4920

564

562

0.0420

561

0,0960

560

0.1680

546

0.0480

555

0.7480

554

0.0020

553

0.0900

299

0.0240

266

0.5340

261

262

0.0720

256

0.3780

0.2220

255 (Part)

0.2040

255

0.2040

255 (Part)

0.0720

251

250

0,0600

243

0.2280

0.3100

244

0.0020

249/601

0.2640

245/642

4.7160

Total

0.0360

435/469

Ladpura Sogaria

435

0.1320

0,3720

434

0.6080

431

0.0040

432

414

0.0240

0.0120

Empty

0,0600

412

0.0240

Empty

0.0200

410/598

0.0040

410

1.2960

Total [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1523

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

5 Kota

0.2580

Kota

523

657

Roteda

Ladpura Kishanpura

0.0540

Ladpura

656

Takia

0.1140

515

0.0900

Contd.

659

0.0540

516

0.5280 660

0.0360

517

0.1920

0.0120

661

662

5.9940

Total

0,1200

631

0,0300

Kota

0.0300

Ladpura Gangayacha Empty 632

0.3000

0,3900

Empty 633

0,1680

0.0480

Empty 631

0.0480

586

0.0480 626

0,0290

0.2340

591

0.0355

Empty

579

0.2760 625

0.0335

0.3720

580

623

0.6120

0.0180

581

606

0.3360

567

0.0540 604

0.0540

549

0.5100 601

0.4320

591

0.4220

543

0.4740 592

0.0040

544

0.0240

505/1 0.1320 Total 3.0960

512

0.2160

0.0120

Kota Ladpura Chandresal 1074

506

0.1140

507

0.0900 Total 0.0120

509

0.2580 Kota

324

0.0900

Ladpura Roteda

0.1380

510

323

0.0100

326

0.3480

Total 3.4260 325

0,2700

Kota

623

0.1980

Ladpura Ganwadi

329

0.0100

622

0.1800 322

0.0480

621

0.0180 320

0.2160

609

0.0720 312

0.0180

586

0.6840

0.2460

304/372

0.1740

189

304

0.5640

191

0.0420 302

0,1440

0.1500 301

188

0.0120

186

0.0240 650

0.1020

185

0.1920 610

0,0020

611

0.0400

183

0.0240 612

0.1020

184

0,1500 619

0.0060

181/547 0.1980 618

0.0480

155

0.2520 617

0.2880

156

0.1320 616

0,0480

157

0.0480 615

0.0420

0.0600

170

614

0.0720

169

0.0780 613

0,1320

162

0.0120 604

0.0780

206

0.3780 588

0,0960

168

0.0780 590

0.3480

167

0.0780

0.0120

589

0.0120

164

591

0.0100

166

0.0840 574

0.0420

165

0.0480 575

0.1500

0.1560 573

0.0540

0.1260 571

0.1440

0.7560

572

0,0600

4.4040

Total

551

0,0600

0.7020

544

0.3660

529

[F. No. L - 14A-G 528

0,1500

S. B. MANDAL, 1524

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

1 नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2005

बून्दी का.आ. 552.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में सेमकोर से केशवरायपाटन पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इंडिया) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्षित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमिके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री अन्तर सिंह नेहरा, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, सी-6 , 107 , कमल अपार्टमेन्ट, सवाई जयसिंह एन.एच. , बनी पार्क, जयपुर, राजस्थान को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

बून्दी

गाँव

जिला तहसील

सर्वे नं . आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में) 2

770

0.0780 बून्दी केशवराय ईश्वर नगर

771

पाटन

0.1320

768

0.0120

765

0.1320

766

0.2400

764

0.0420

0.1860

735

0.0480

722

721

0.0190

0.2930

720

707

0.0120

701

0,0900

700

0.3120

0,0600

702

705

0.0060

704

0,2040

1.8660

जोड़

431

0.0480

पटोलिया

बून्दी

0.2160

422

केशवराय पाटन

[PART II SBC. 3(ii)] 2

255

पटोलिया

0.1860 केशवराय पाटन

256

0.1500

253

0.0480

252

0.1560

251

0.2760

250

0.0720

263

0.0140

264

0.0280

266

0.0480

295

0.2880

297

0.0040

296

0.0640

294

0.0360

293

0.0400

292

0.1200

0,0120

291

0.0420

310

289

0.1800

286

0.1620

287

0.2880

283

0.3480

284

0.0180

2.8440

जोड़

1232

0.0480 केशवराय पाटन

केशवराय पाटन

1231

0.1080

1220 0.0180

1214

0.6540

1215 0.0120

611

0.1560

613

0.0120

456

0.0180

550

0.5540

0.0040

549

0.0120

541

540

0.3540

539

0.0600

0.0120

537

0.7320

534

0.0360

532

530

0.1380

2.9280

जोड़

[फा. सं. एल-14014/8/04- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th February, 2005

S.O. 552. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum gas through Samcore toKeshavraipatan pipeline project in the State ofRajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;

1525 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

294

Patolia

0.0360

Bundi Keshav

0.0400-

293

RaiPatan

292

0.1200 And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the saidpipeline is proposed to be laid andwhich is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

0.0120

291

310

0,0420

0.1800

289

286

0.1620

0.2880

287

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

283

0.3480

284

0.0180

2.8440

Total

1232

Bundi

0.0480

Keshav Keshav

0.1080

1231

Rai Patan

1220

0.0180

0.6540

1214

1215

0,0120

611

0.1560 Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twentyone days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section(1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the landto Sh.Antar Singh Nehra, Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, C-6, 107 , Kamal Apartment, Sawai Jai Singh N.H. , Banipark, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

613 0.0120

456

0.0180 SCHEDULE

550 0.5540

549 0.0040 Distt. Tehsil Village Survey

0.0120

541 No.

0.3540

540

0.0600

539

Landtobe

Aquired for

R.O.U. ( in

Hectares)

0.0120

537

534 0.7320

532

0,0360 770

Bundi Keshav Ishwar

0.0780

530 0.1380 771

0.1320

Rai Patan Nagar

768

0.0120

Total 2.9280

0.1320

765

0.2400

766

[F. No. L- 14014/8/04-G.P. ] 764

0.0420

735

0.1860

S.B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

0.0480

722

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

0.0190

721

0.2930

720

0.0120

707

0.0900

701

700

0.3120

702

0,0600

705

0.0060

का.आ. 553.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाईपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

704

0.2040

Total 1.8660

0.0480

431

Bundi

Patolia

0.2160

422

Keshav Rai Patan

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाईपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

255

0.1860

256

0,1500

0.0480

253

0,1560

252

0,2760

251

250

0.0720

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

263

0.0140

264

0.0280

266

0.0480

295

0,2880

297

0.0040

296

0.0640

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्तअनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमिके नीचे पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार 1526

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC, 3 (ii)]

1512

0.1046

1. बुरावई (जारी )

1509

0.0020 के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री दीपक नंदी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- मांगल्या पाईपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना, भारत पेट्रोलियम कापोरेशन लिमिटेड, 1 - सी, बालमंदिर कालोनी, होटल पिंक पैलेस के पास, सवाई माधोपुर-322001 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

1508

0.0551 अनुसूची

1507

0.0094 राज्य: राजस्थान

तहसील: कुम्हेर जिला: भरतपुर

1517

0.0362

1518

0.1248 सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल है . में

1519

क्र. ग्राम का नाम सं.

0.0104

1592

0.0073 1

1591

0.1155 1.

1287

0.0026

1590

बुरावई

0.0013 1294

1555

0.0999

0.0110 1288

0.0364

1525/1790

0.0176

1556

1293

0.0189

0.0675

0.0477

1292

1589

0.0332 1306

1557

0.0527

0.0449

1581

1307

0.0519

0.0027

1308

1582

0.1197

0.0095

1580

1312

0.0074

0.0254 1317

0.0040

1583

0.1429

0.0475

1315

1586

0.0518 1313

0.0707

1585

0.0768 1314

0.0685

1038

0.0072 1066

0.0144

1051

0.0144 1065

0.0585

2676

2 उबार

0.0837 1064

0.0163

2677

0,0020 1046

0,0094

2673

0.0685

0.0010

1047

0.0769

2675

1063

0.0638

2674

0.0483 1048

0.0040

0.0135

2651

1049

0.0786

0.0742

2652

1038

0.0025

0.0625

2653

1036

0.0782

2654

0.0020 1051

0.0020

0.0950

2648

1021

0.0673

0.0758

2634/2862

1020

0.0245

2640

0.0250 1019

0.0081

2650

0.0050 1016

0.0097

0.0456

1111

1017

0.0938

0.0424

1112

1018

0.0338

0.0023

1113

1364

0.0020

1114

0.0642 1378 ( कच्ची सड़क) 0.0127

0.1139

1115/2868

1450

0,0666

0.0156

1118

0.0131

1449

0.0178

1116

1452

0.0755

0.0846

1117

0.0015

1451

0.0134

1119

1453

0.0315

1120

0.1086 1454

0.0362

0.0133

1121

1499

0.0543

0.0020

1122

1498

0.0219

1074

0.1139 1511

0.0020 [ भाग II- सखण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1:527

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माथ 30, 1926

1 2

4 1055

0.0020

2. उबार (जारी)

1675

3. सान्तरूक (जारी)

0.0072

1677

0.0167 1077

0.0685

1673

0.0393 1187

0.0257

217/5509

0.0226. 1189

0.0053

379

0.0282 1188

0.0751

382

0.0778 1191

0.0034

0,0116

381

1197

0.0153

383

0.0095 1196

0.0629

384

0.1166 1195

0.0950

385

0.0115 1200

0.0002

340

0.0729 1201

0.1050

339

0.0010 1202

0.0117

341

0.0056 1071

0.0165

338

0.1486 1064

0.0010

337

0.0895 1063

0.0239

0.0187

299(कच्ची सड़क) 1062

0,0010

333

0.0694 1059

0,0296

331

0.0160 1061

0.0455

415

0.0848

0.0731

1060

447

0.0547 1057

0.0669

0.0283

446

0.0229

1056

913 (कच्ची सड़क) 0.0186 4670

3. सानारुक

0.0520

953

0.0629 4669

0.0838

959

0.0041 4668

0.0504

954

0.0148 4657

0.0222

958

0.0482 4667

0.0504

956

0.0573

0.0738

955

0.0864 4658

4656

0.0611

947

0.0307 4655

0.0633

946

0.0126 4652

0.0957

945

0.0253 2069

0.1833

987 (कच्ची सड़क) 0.0178 (गोवर्धन नाल

1245

0.0934 2109

0.0252

1246

0.0424 2108

0.0174

1241

0.0150 2109

0.0216

1247

0.0052 2110

0.1279

0.0040 2117

0.1656

0.0040 2119

0.0795

1240/5487

0.0216 2120

0.0432

1240

0,1116

0.0162

2103 (कच्ची सड़क)

1239

0.0020 1451

0.0123

1238

0.1039

0.1045

1452

0,0333

1237

1450

0.0072

1236

0.0612 1517

0.1169

1235

0.0719 1518

0.1483

1254

0.0020 1519

0.0625

1252 (कच्ची सड़क) 0.0288

0.0224

1665 (कच्ची सड़क)

2518

0.0825 1680

0.0087

2519

0.0110 1676

0.1108 1528

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii)] 1

1 2

4 2517

3. सान्तरूक (जारी )

0,0020

3624

3. सान्तरूक (जारी )

0.0179 2520

0.0662

3622

0.0023 2521

0.0620

3625

0.0400 2515 (कच्ची सड़क) 0.0209

3621

0.0020 2498

0.0588

3620

0.0253 2497

0.0517

3619

0.0173 2496

0.0040

3618

0.0522 2407

0.0020

3602

0.0615 2499

0.0661

3603

0.0038

3615

2495 (कच्ची सड़क) 0.0635

0.0305 2390

0.0035

3606

0.0898 2391

0.1026

3605

0.0702 2392

0.0633

2393

0.0060

[फा. सं . आर.- 31015/81/2004- ओ आर- II] 2406

0.0254

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 2405

0.0160

New Delhi, the 9th February, 2005 2408

0.0468

2404

0.0242

2409 (कच्ची सड़क) 0.0215

2411

0.0025

2412

0.0947

0.0851

2414

2413

0.0276

S.O. 553. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthetransportation of petroleum products from Manglya (Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, an extensionpipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi should be laid by Bharat PetroleumCorporation Limited;

2420

0.0259

2421

0.0470

2384(कच्ची सड़क) 0.0371

2351

0,0370

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right ofuser in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which it described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

2352

0.0598

2350

0.0330

2353

0.0835

2354

0.0010

2355

0.0795

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

2370

0.0726

2371

0.0430

2378

0,0570

2374

0,0040

2375

0.0347

2376

0,0511

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date onwhich copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for layingofthepipeline under the land to Shri Deepak Nandi, Competent Authority, Mumbai -Manglya Pipeline Extension Project, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, 2377

0,0020

4029 (कच्ची सड़क) 0.0176

1-C, Balmandir Colony, Near Hotel Pink Palace , Sawai- madhopur -322001 (Rajasthan) .

3655

0.0812

SCHEDULE

3644

0.0179

Tehsil : Kumher District: Bharatpur State: Rajasthan 3645

0.0467

3646

0.0519

Area in Hect .

Survey No.

Sl. NameofVillage

No.

3652

0.0410

0.0010

3649

1 2

3651

0.1117

0.0026

1. Buravai

1287

3633

0.0133

1294

0.0999 3632

0.1228

1288

0.0364 3623

0.0116

1293

0.0189 1529 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 , 2005/ माघ 30, 1926

4 1292

0.0477

1038

0.0072 1. Buravai (Contd.)

1. Buravai (Contd.)

1306

0.0527

1051

0.0144 1307

0.0027

2676

0.0837

2 Ubar

1308

0.1197

2677

0.0020 1312

0.0074

2673

0.0685 1317

0.0040

2675

0.0769 1315

0.0475

2674

0.0483 1313

0.0707

2651

0.0135 1314

0.0685

2652

0.0742 1066

0.0144

0.0625

2653

1065

0.0585

0.0020

2654

1064

0.0163

2648

0.0950 1046

0.0094

0.0758

2634/2802

1047

0.0010

2640

0.0250 1063

0.0638

2650

0.0050 1048

00.040

1111

0.0456 1049

0.0786

0.0424

1112

1038

0,0025

1113

0.0023 1036

0.0782

0.0642

1114

1051

0.0020

0.1139

1115/2868

1021

0.0673

0.0156

1118

1020

0.0245

1116

0.0178 1019

1117

0.0846

0.0081

1016

0.0097

1119

0.0134 1017

0.1086

0.0938

1120

1018

1121

0.0133

0.0338

1364

0.0020

1122

0.0020

0.0127

1074

0.1139 1378(C/T)

1450

0.0666

0.0020

1055

1449

1077

0.0685

0.0131

1187

1452

0.0755

0.0257 1451

1189

0.0053

0.0015

0.0751 1453

1188

0.0315

0.0034 1454

1191

0.0362

0.0153

1197

1499

0.0543

0.0629

1196

1498

0.0219

0.0950

1195

1511

0.0020

0.0002

1200

1512

0.1046

0.1050

1201

1509

0.0020

0.0117

1202

1508

0.0551

0.0165

1071

1507

0.0094

0.0010-

1064

1517

0.0362

0.0239

1063

1518

0.1248

0,0010

1062

1519

0.0104

0.0296

1059

1592

0.0073

0.0455

1061

1591

0.1155

0.0731

1060

1590

0.0013

0.0669

1057

1555

0.0110

0.0229

1056

1525/1790

0.0176

4670

0.0520

3 Santruk

1556

0.0675

0.0838

4669

1589

0.0332

0,0504

4668

1557

0.0449

4657

0.0222 1581

0.0519

0.0504

4667

1582

0.0095

4658

0.0738 1580

0.0254

4656

0,0611 1583

0.1429

0.0633

4655

1586

0.0518

0.0957

4652

1585

0.0768

414 GI/2005-9 1530

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

4 3.

2069

Santruk (Contd .)

0.1833

1240

0.1116

3 Santruk (Contd.)

1239

(Goverdhan Drain)

0.0020 2109

0.0252

1238

0.1039 2108

0.0174

1237

0.0333 2109

0.0216

1236

0.0612 2110

0.1279

1235

0.0719 2117

0.1656

1254

0,0020 2119

0.0795

1252(С/ Г)

0.0288 2120

0.0432

2518

0.0825 2103 (СЛ )

0.0162

2519

0.0110 1451

0.0123

2517

0.0020 1452

0.1045

2520

0.0662 1450

0.0072

2521

0.0620 1517

0.1169

0.0209

2515 (С/ Г)

1518

0.1483

2498

0.0588 1519

0.0625

2497

0.0517

0.0224

1665 ( С/ Г)

2496

0.0040 1680

0.0087

2407

0.0020 1676

0.1108

2499

0.0661 1675

0.0072

0.0635

2495 (С/ Г)

1677

0.0167

2390

0.0035 1673

0.0393

0.1026

2391

217/5509

0.0226

2392

0.0633 379

0.0282

0.0060

2393

382

0.0778

2406

0.0254 381

0.0116

2405

0.0160 383

0.0095

2408

0.0468 384

0.1166

2404

0.0242 385

0.0115

0.0215

2409 (С/Г)

340

0.0729

0,0025

2411

339

0.0010

2412

0.0947

0.0056

341

0.0851

2414

338

0.1486

0.0276

2413

337

0.0895

0.0259

2420

0.0187

299 (C/T)

2421

0.0470 333

0.0694

0.0371

2384(С/ Г)

331

0.0160

2351

0.0370 415

0.0848

0.0598

2352

447

0.0547

2350

0.0330 446

0.0283

2353

0.0835

0,0186

913 (С/ Г)

0.0010

2354

953

0.0629

0.0795

2355

959

0.0041

2370

0.0726 954

0.0148

0,0430

2371

958

0.0482

0.0570

2378

956

0.0573

2374

0.0040 955

0.0864

0.0347

2375

947

0.0307

2376

0.0511 946

0.0126

2377

0.0020 945

0.0253

0.0176

4029(С/Г)

0.0178

987 (C/T)

3655

0.0812 1245

0.0934

0.0179

3644

1246

0.0424

3645

0.0467 1241

0.0150

3646

0.0519 1247

0.0052

0.0410

3652

0,0040

0.0010

3649

0,0040

0.1117

3651

1240/5487

0.0216 1531 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30, 1926

4 3633

0.0133

3 Santruk (Contd.)

0.0640

1. वजीराबाद (जारी) 2039 (ग्रस्ता)

3632

0.1228

2041

0.0750 3623

0.0116

2042

0.1190 3624

0.0179

2043

0.0580 3622

0.0023

2044

3625

0.0690

0.0400

3621

0,0020

2046

0.2350 3620

0.0253

0.1350

2048

3619

0.0173

2049

0.1520 3618

0.0522

2104

0.4150 3602

0,0615

2115

0,2980 3603

0.0038

3615

0.0305

0.2840

2122

3606

0,0898

0.0430

2123

3605

0.0702

2124

0.0640

0.0230 [F. No. R-31015/81 /2004-OR -II ]

2131/1/1

0.2920

2131/1/3

HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

2131/2

0.1410 नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी , 2005

0.1280

2115/4

2215/7

0.0040

2134

0,0510

2135

0.0030

0,0030

2150

0.0060

2151

का.आ. 554. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाईपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0.0290

2152

0.1060

2153

0,0420

2154

0,0490

2155

2156

0.0510

0.0030

2157

2168

0.0100

0.0050

2231

2232

0.1260 अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

0.1160

2237

0.2280

2238

612

0.0600

2. नाथूपुर

0.0510

613

614

0.0630

615

0.0920

616

0.0390

617

0.0450 कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री लाल सिंह सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुम्बई- मांगल्या पाईपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना, भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, प्लाट नं . - 590 , सेक्टर 21 ए, फरीदाबाद -121001 ( हरियाणा ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

619

0.0040

835

0.4300

836

0.0610

राज्य: हरियाणा

जिला: गुड़गांव अनुसूची

तहसील: गुड़गांव

837

0.0440 सर्वे नंबर क्षेत्रफल हे. में

840

0.0040 क्र. ग्राम का नाम सं.

0.0060

843

1 2

844

0.0060

0.0030

0.0480

845

1. वजीराबाद

846

0.0040

0.0130

848

0.0840

0910 2036 2037 2038 1532

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1 2

1 2

4 851

0.0900

0.1310 2. नाथूपुर (जारी )

3. कादरपुर (जारी)

852

0,3630

15/1

0.0420 854

0.1670

15/2

0.0230 862

0.0450

0.1500

0.0030

865

0.1710 866

0.0450

0.0890

101(रास्ता)

872

0.0270

0.0130

102(रास्ता)

871

0.1700

0.0130

103 (रास्ता)

874

0,0010

0.0200

104 (रास्ता)

876

0.3130

0.0240

119 ( रास्ता)

877

1.3360

0.1600

482(रास्ता)

884

0.1210

0,0080

483 (रास्ता)

0.0140

887 ( रास्ता)

0.0390

497 (रास्ता)

61/4

0.1380

3. कादरपुर

33/5

0.1220

4. बहरमपुर

0.0340

0.0450

32/1

0.1750

0.1010

18/3/2

7/1

0.0440

0.0740 7/2

0.1680

0.1640 14

0.1770

0.0210 17/2

0,1350

12/2

0.1660 24

0.0170

0.0130

13/1

0.2300

51/1

0.1250 2

0.2300

0.0710

0.0460

0.1980 50/2/1

0.0030

17/25

0.0220 6

0.1660

0.1420

14/5/2

15/1

0.1060

0.1540

0.0690

15/2

0.0420

0.0920

0.2040

0,2500

0.0220 25

0,2500

0.0310

13/1

44/5

0.2140

0.1704

0.0020

9/1

0.0010 7

0.2140

0.2100 13/1

0.0470

0.0610

0.0230

13/2

4/13

0.0110

0.1260

0.0980

0.0010

18/1

0,0290

0.1230

18/2

0.1650

0.0730

19/1

0.0980

0.0030

19/2

0.0740

23/1

0.0180

23/2

0.0370 22

0.1850

0.0280 34/4

0.0320

261(रास्ता)

0.0230

0.1340

262(यस्ता)

0.0180 6

0,1710

263(यस्ता)

0.0280 15

0.1980

267 (रास्ता)

0.250 16

0.1770

264(रास्ता)

0.1760

0.1590

27/5

48/2

5. उल्लावास 1533 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

4 9

0.0850

0.0990 5. उल्लावास ( जारी )

20/11

8. डूंडाहेड़ा

0.0810

0,1440 11

0.0870

0.0310 45/4

0,1830

0.0010 5

0.0050

0,1190 7

0,1570

0.1070 13

0.1290

0.0040 14

0.0780

0.0340 18

0.1950

0.1470 22

0,0960

21/21

0.0330 23

0.0750

22/1

0.0150 38/1

0.1210

0.0170 2

0.0550

0.0040 10

0.1490

0.1480 11

0.1320

22/9

0,0070 15

0.0520

0.0050 16

0.1830

0.1490 24

0.0210

0.0150 25

0.1790

0.0150

29/2

0.0290

0.1490 29/3

0.1260

41/2

0.0150 8

0.0120

0.0140 9

0,1550

0.1490 12

0.1850

0.0150 19

0,1740

0.0070 22

0.1470

0.0110

0.0220

24/3

0.0520

9. घाटा खांगरपुर

0.1470

0.1080 7

0,0010

0.1070 8

0.1450

0.1060 13

0.1790

0.0980 18

0,1760

17/1/1

0.0960 23

0.1620

1/2

0.0120 14/6

0.0940

2/1

0.0010 7

0.0790

2/2

0.0010 14

0.1750

0.0080 17

0.1710

10/1

0,0160

0,1860

10/2

0.0630

0.0270

332(रास्ता)

0.0630

0,0340

334(रास्ता)

12/1

. 0.0200

0.0450

335(रास्ता)

0.0310

12/2

0,0350

338(रास्ता)

0.1030

0.0740

339(रास्ता)

0.0040

0.0770

21/2

0.0280 6. हैदरपुर

339(रास्ता)

0,3070

342

0.0830 347

0,9200

25/1

0.0060

0.1370 420

0,5000

7. सिकंदरपुर घोसी

0.0380 457

0.8080

8/1

0.1000 493

0.6840 1534

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

4 8/2

0.0050

9. घाटा खांगरपुर (जारी )

611

0.5410

10. चकरपुर (जारी )

0.0730

713

0.4890 14

0.0710

0.0070

[फा. सं. आर-31015/89/2004 ओ . आर- II ] 17/1

0,0680

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 17/2

0,0710

24/1

0.0130

New Delhi, the 14th February, 2005 25

0.1300

34/5

0,0460

39/1/1

0.0740

1/2

0.0390

0,0770

0.0660

S. O. 554. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Manglya (Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, an extension pipeline to Piyala in the Sate of Haryana and Bijwasan NCT of Delhi should be laid by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

12/1

0,0710

12/2

0.0660

18/2

0.0110

19/1

0.130

19/2

0.0640

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which it described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

0,0340

0.0850

47/2

0.0030

3/1

0,0670

9/2

0.0790

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

0.0350

125(रास्ता)

0.0120

126 (रास्ता)

0.0210

128(रास्ता)

0.0580

129(रास्ता)

534

0.0800

10. चकरपुर

543

0.0260

544

0.0360

545

0.0450

546

0.0130

547

0.0690

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object inwriting to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri LAL SINGH , Competent Authority, Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , Plot NO . 590 , Sector 21A, Faridabad - 121001 (Haryana) .

SCHEDULE

554

0.0540

555

0.0800

Tehsil : Gurgaon District : Gurgaon State: Haryana 558

0.0220

Survey No. Area in Hect .

559

0.2110

Sl . Name ofVillage No.

560

0.0540

1 2

561

0,0320

2036

1. Wazirabad

0.0480 562

0.0340

2037

0.0130 563/1

0,0360

2038

0,0840 563/2

0.0320

0.0640

2039 (Rasta)

564

0.0320

2041

0,0750 565

0.0870

2042

0.1190 567

2043

0.1220

0.0580

2044

0.069

0.0190

568

2046

0.2350 569

1.0720 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1535 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30; 1926

4 2048

0.1350

884

1. Wazirabad( Contd.)

0.1210

2 Nathupur (Contd.)

2049

0.1520

0.0140

887 (Road)

2104

0.4150

61/4

0.1380

3. Kadarpur

2115

0.2980

0.0340 2122

0,2840

0.1750 2123

0.0430

7/1

0.0440 2124

0.0640.

7/2

0.1680 2131/1/1

0.0230

0.1770

0.2920

2131/1/3

17/2

0.1350

0.1410

2131/2

0.0170 2115/4

0.1280

51/1

0,2300 2215/7

0.0040

0.2300 2134

0.0510

0.0460 2135

0.0030

50/2/1

0.0030 2150

0.0030

0.1660

0.0060

2151

15/1

0.1060 2152

0.0290

0.0690

15/2

2153

0.1060

0,0920 2154

0.0420

0,2500 2155

0.0490

0.2500 2156

0.0510

0.2140

44/5

2157

0,0030

0.0020 2168

0.0100

0.2140 2231

0.0050

13/1

0.0470 2232

0.1260

13/2

0.0230 2237

0.1160

0.1260 2238

0.2280

18/1

0.0010 612

0,0600

2.Nathupur

18/2

0.1230

0.0510

613

0.0730

19/1

614

0.0630

19/2

0.0030

0:0920

615

0.0180 616

0.0390

0.1850 617

0.0450

34/4

0,0320 619

0.0040

0.1340 835

0.4300

0.1710 836

0.0610

0.1980 837

0.0440

0,1770 840

0.0040

27/5

0,1590 843

0.0060

0.1310 844

0.0060

15/1

0.0420 845

0.0030

15/2

0.0230 846

0.0040

0,1500 848

0.0910

0.1710 851

0,0900

0.0890

101 (Rasta)

0.3630

852

0.0130

102(Rasta)

0.1670

854

0.0130

103(Rasta)

0.0450

862

0.0200

104 (Rasta)

865

0.0030

0.0240 866

119 (Rasta)

0.0450

0.1600

482(Rasta)

0.0270

872

0.0080

483 (Rasta)

871

0,1700

0.0390

497(Rasta)

0.0010

874

33/5

0.1220 876

0.3130

4. Beharampur

32/1

0.0450 877

1.3360 1536

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 / MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2

0.1010

29/3

0.1260 18/3/2

4. Beharampur ( Contd.)

5. Ullawas (contd.)

0,0740

0.0120 8

0.1640

0.1550 9

0.0210

0.1850 12/2

0,1660

0.1740 13/1

0.0130

0.1470 19

24/3

0.1250

0.0220

0.1470 20

0.0710

0,0010

0.1980

0.1450 17/25

0.0220

0.1790 14/5/2

0.1420

0.1760 16

0.1540

0.1620

0.0420

14/6

0.0940 24

0.2040

0.0790

0.0220

0.1750 13/1

0.0310

0.1710

0.1704

0,1860 9/1

0.0010

0.2100

0.0270

332(Rasta)

0.0340 11

0,0610

334(Rasta)

4/13

0,0110

0.0450

335 (Rasta)

0.0980

0.0350

338 (Rasta)

0.0290

0.0740

339 (Rasta)

0.1650

0.0770

339 (Rasta)

6. Haiderpur

0.0980

342

0.3070

0.0740

23/1

347

0,9200

0.0370

23/2

420

0.5000

7. Sikanderpur Ghosi

0.0280

261 (Rasta)

457

0,8080

0.0230

262(Rasta)

493

0.6840

0.0180

263 (Rasta)

8. Dundaheda

0,0990

20/11

0.0280

267 (Rasta)

(0.1440

0.250

264(Rasta)

0.0310 48/2

5. Ullawas

0,1760

0.0010 9

0.0850

0.1190 10

0.0810

0.1070 11

0.0870

0.0040 45/4

0.1830

0.0340

0.0050

0.1470

0.1570

0.0330

21/21

0,1290

22/1

0.0150 14

0.0780

0.0170

0.1950

0.0040

0.0960

(0.1480 23

0.0750

22/9

0,0070 38/1

0.1210

(0,0050 2

0.0550

0.1490 10

0.1490

0.0150

0.1320

0.0150

0.0520

0,1490 16

0.1830

0.0150

41/2

0.0210

0.0140 25

0.1790

0.1490

29/2

0.0290

0.0150 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1537 भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

4 12

0.0070

0.0360

10. Chakarpur (Contd .) 544

545

0.0450

0,0110

& Dundaheda (Contd.)

546

0.0520

0.0130 9. Ghata Khangarpur

547

0,0690

0.1080

554

0,0540

0.1070

555

0,0800

0.1060

558

0.0220

0.0980

559

17/1/1

0.0960

0,2110 1/2

0.0120

560

0.0540 2/1

0.0010

561

0.0320 2/2

562

0.0340

0.0010

0.0080

563/1

0.0360 10/1

0,0160

563/2

0.0320

564

0,0320 10/2

0,0630

565

0.0870 11

0.0630

567

0.1220 12/1

0.0200

568

0.0190 12/2

0.0310

569

1.0720 19

0,1030

611

0.5410 20

0,0040

713

0.4890 21/2

0.0280

0.0830

[F. No. R-31015/89/2004-OR- IIJ 25/1

0.0060

HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

0.1370

0.0380

नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी, 2005 8/1

0.1000

8/2

0,0050

0.0730

0.0710

0.0070

17/1

0.0680

17/2

0.0710

24/1

0.0130

0.1300

34/5

0.0460

39/1/1

0,0740

का.आ. 555.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962(1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खंड ( क) के अनुसरण में भारत सरकारके पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 172, तारीख 01-02-2001 द्वारा प्राधिकृत श्री के. वाडीवेल के स्थान श्री ए. विवेकानंदन, उप कलक्टर, तमिलनाडु सरकार को, उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन , तमिलनाडु के राज्यक्षेत्र के भीतर, पेट्रोनेट सी.सी.के. लिमिटेड की कोचीन -कोयम्बतूर - करूर पाइपलाइन के सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है । 1/2

0,0390

[फा. सं. आर-31015/12/2003-ओ. आर.- II ] 9

0.0770

0.0660

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 12/1

0.0710

12/2

0.0660

New Delhi , the 14th February, 2005 18/2

0.0110

19/1

0.130

19/2

0,0640

0.0340

0.0850

47/2

0,0030

0,0670

3/1

9/2

0,0790

0.0350

125 (Rasta)

0.0120

126(Rasta)

0.0210

128 (Rasta)

S. O. 555. In pursuance ofclause ( a) of Section 2 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby authorises Shri A. Vivekanandan, Deputy Collector, Government of Tamil Nadu, to perform the functions of the competent authority, Cochin- Coimbatore-Karur Pipeline of Petronet CCK Limited, under the saidAct, within the territory ofthe State ofTamil Nadu, inplaceof Shri K. Vadivel, authorised vide notificationof theGovernment of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and NaturalGas, Number S.O. 172 dated 1-2-01 .

0.0580

129(Rasta)

534

0.0800

10. Chakarpur

543

0.0260

[F. No. R-31015/ 12/2003 -OR-II HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

414 G1 /2005-10 1538

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)]

1 2

4 नईदिल्ली, 14 फरवरी, 2005

631

0.0634

डुमरिया (जारी )

609

0.0287

601

0.0536

606

0.0236

604

0.0108 का.आ. 556.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

605

0.0635

607

0.0445

580

0.0040

579

0.0299 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

578

0.0860

577

0.0072

717

0,1558

575

0.0573

718

0.0040

719

0.0648 अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

574

0,0220

573

0.0771

571

0.0040

570

0,0504

727

0.0187

569

0.1653

0.0020

568

0.0360

778

2. रीछोली

779

0.0010 कोई व्यक्तिजो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमिके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री दीपक नंदी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना , भारत पेट्रेलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, 1 - सी , बालमंदिर कालोनी, होटल पिंक पैलेस के पास, सवाई माधोपुर-322001 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

753

0.0108

762

0,0936 अनुसूची

0.0020

760

तहसील: बयाना

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला: भरतपुर

0.0216

759

0.0920

754

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

क्र.सं. ग्राम का नाम

सर्वे संख्या

0.0140

758

0.0031

757

0.0612

755

663

0.0504

1. डुमरिया

0.0914

710

664

0.0216

711

0.0144 662

0.0584

712

0.0216 661

0.0505

0.0040

723

660

0.0240

0.0400

722

665

0.0144

0.0335

721

668

0.0838

0.0300

714

670

0.0222

666

0.0140 669

0.0619

665

0.0792 626

0.0287

0.0040

664

637

0.0638

667

0.0300 629

0.0335

0.0072

668

627

0.0216

0.0737

669

628

0.0108

670

0.0072 636

0.0216

0.0150

652

635

0.0159

652/837

0.0216 630

0.0714

653/818

0.0214 634

0.0020

0.0709

653

0.0057

632 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

1539 1

4 रीछोली (जारी )

491

0.0314

237

नगला कुरवारिया ( जारी )

0.0152 499

0.0010

246

0.1565 497

0.0216

247

0,0020 495

0.0288

236

0.0020 492

0.0080

231

0.0340 493

0.1472

230

0.0683 494

0.0216

223

0.0761 496

0.0432

229

0.0700 519

0.0147

225

0.1096 526

0.1455

363

0.1142 527

0.0864

367

0.1425

5. नगलाखाटका !

530

0.0020

347

0,0703 531

0.0072

348

0.1375 471

0.0144

341

0.1636 470

0.1152

342

0.0851 466

0,0050

326

0.0147 465

0,0360

338

0.1368 464

0,0432

329

0,0576 463

0.0072

328

0,0080 462

0.0157

0.0112

399( कच्ची सडक)

461

0.0172

0.0864 460

0.0432

0.0216 453

0.0144

0,0360 454

0.0981

0.1351 451

0.0555

84/797

0.0288

0.0010

1300

3. पीलूपुरा

0,1308

1301

0.0110

0.0124

83(कच्ची सडक)

610

0.0479

4. नगला कुरवारिया

0.0120 561

0.1200

0.0898 563

0.2389

0.0353 573

0.1923

0.0253 574

0.1279

0.0138 584

0.1610

0.0010 582

0.1096

6 लहचोरा कलां

1237

0.0144 454

0.0173

1238

0.0648 175

0.0144

1236

0.0462 176

0.0504

0.0576

1221

0.0916

177

1235

0.0040 443

0.0022

1222

0.0524

0.0087

442

1219

0.0513

0.1158

0,0775 179

1218

439/622

0,0020

1206

0,0504 281

0.0040

1207

0.0504

0.0393

280

0.0574

1208

0.1215

279

1209

0.0234 289

0.0445

0.0108

1205

0.0669

0.0040 291

1202

0.0288

0.0920

292

1345

0.0492

0.0792 269

1345/1529

0.0826

244

0.000

1348 1540

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1 2

4 1352

0.0317

6. लहचोरा कलां (जारी )

737

0.0718

7. नारोली (जारी )

1353

0.0214

736

0.0503 1402/1571

0.0504

725

0.0216 1391

0.1020

0.0792

733 (सड़क)

1387

0,0018

498

0.0110 1386

0,0219

724

0,0010 1385

0.0280

0,0433

500

1384

0.0206

0.0288

502

1388

0.0144

503

0.0621 1383

0.0339

504

0.0154 1382

0,0762

0.0261

505

1381

0.0202

506

0.0820

0.0402

1380

507

0,0106 1369

0,0203

511

0.0910

0.0207

508

0,0772 1360

512

0.0144 1361

0.0336

0.1368

524

1367

0.0040

523

0.0858 1362

0.0601

0.0059

522

1363

0.0555

517

0.0072 1262

0.0298

518

0.0209 1262/1523

0.0144

0.0144. 1263

0.0288

519(कच्ची सड़क )

0.0717 1384/1584

0.0040

185

0.0404 1390

0.0020

0.0259

184

1349

0.0576

0.1008

181

0.0216

1345/1531

0.0936

179

1345/1532

0.0648

180

0.0040

1345/1530

0.0204

178

1253

0.0042

0.0959

169

1252

0.0562

0.0648

170( कच्ची सड़क)

0.0357

7. नारे..ती

1085

0.0570

167

0.0244

1029(कच्चीसड़क)

171

0.1391 979

0.0648

166

0.0144 978

0.0180

0.1152

168

970

0.0022

124

0.1086 977

0,0334

118

0.0144 971

0.0432

1439

0.0733 975

0.1763

0.0224

1274

976

0,0040

0,2620

1273

462

0.0322

0.0792

1276

461

0.0621

1275

0.0020 457

0.1368

0.0817

1283

458

0.0962

0.0131

1217(कच्ची सड़क)

459

0.0216

0.0930

1126

478

0.0040

0.0175

1124

476

0.0017

0,0569

1115

477

0.0459

0.0216

1114

0.1072

479

1116

0.0576 482

0.1584

1087

0.0975 738

0.0708

1084

0.0017 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1541

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 2005/माष 30, 1926

1086

7. नारोली ( जारी )

0,1008

8 मिलकपुर (जारी)

1441

0.0020

535/2579

0.1728

& मिलकपुर

535

0.1440

0.1584

533

0.0108

485(कच्चीसड़क)

531

0.0272

530

0.0492

529

0.1254

528

0.0785

527

0.0576

526

0.0040

517

0.0289

516

0.0040

0.0279

537(कच्चीसड़क)

539

0.1772

110

0.0144

111

0.1296

106

0.0739

105

0.0040

104

0.0078

103

0.0176

0.0258

102

0.0252

101

0.0261

0.0302

0.0247

0.0220

0.1736

0.0771

0.0020

0.0040

9. भाग ब्रह्मवाद

0.0397

0.0042

0.0393

0.0336

0,0375

0.0376

0.0360

0.0504

0.0520

0.0720

0.0576

0.0020

776

0.0312

758

0.0417

759

0.0534

774

0.0166

773

0.0474

760

0.0219

4 3

761

0.0239

0.0509 772

771

0.0010

0.0504 762

764

0.0288

0.0243 768

0.0287 738 (कच्ची सड़क)

767

0.0864 766

0.1008 667

0.0459

0.0475 660

669

0.0371

0.0754 675

669/2507

0.0212 674

0.0283 673

0.0020 676

0.0288 668

0.0504 680

0.0080 672

0.0648 685

0.0099 686

0.1192 699

0.0808

0.0678 698

695

0.1350 693

0.0024 601

0.0968 602

0.1022 694

0.0020 604

0.0020 700

0.0040

0.0360

0.0512

0.0544

0.0437

0.1051 61

0,0360

0.0144

0.1177

0.0820

0,0949

0.0020

0.0184

0.1038

0.1031 100

101

0.0020 104

0.1093 102

0.0110

0.0886 103

112

0.0116 1542

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUAR 9 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

1 2

चहल (जारी)

0.0757

133 (कच्ची सड़क)

9. भाग बह्मवाद (जारी)

147

0.0024

146

0.0728

144

0.0216

145

0.0288

149

0.0144

143

0.0434

294

0.1073

295

0.1020

296

0.0782

302

0.0360

305

0.0558

303

0.1730

0.0525

314(कच्ची सड़क)

316

0.0792

1106

0.0288

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

4 51

0.0248 49

0.0576 48

0.0504 43

0.0040 52

0.0360 42

0.1054 31

0.1018 269

0.0820

0.2088 283

282

0.0742 281

0.1656 276

0.0672 270

0.0540 271

0.0588 272

0.1271 274

0.0040

0.0199

11. कारवारी

1107

0.0728

1114

0.1032

1113

0.0024

1116

0.0670

0.0080

1110(रेल)

1093

0.0725

0.0236

1073 ( कच्ची सड़क)

1066

0.0273

1024

0.0316

1023

0.1332

0.0316

1022

999

0,0475

0,0566

1000

1001

0.1197

0.0760

1002

981

0.0476

969

0.1728

1024

0.0316

0.0373

980

0,0504

979

968

0.0210

0.0616

959

960

0.0227

962

0.0040

961

0.0398

0,0936

966

0,1315

965

834

0.0958

0.1110

991/1224

903

0.0360

974

0.1224

969

0.1728

970

0.0108

0.0216

10, चहल

213

0.0218 214

0.0383 215

216

0.0254 217

0,0240 218

0.0279

0.0141 219

0.0450 220

0.0216 221/1262

0.0386 221

222

0.0463

0.0389 223

224

0.0230

0.0020 225

0.0508 765

0.0108 764

0.0919 759

760

0.0360 758

0.0465 757

0.0502 756

0.0536

0.1242 257

0.0420 744

0.0504 284

743

0.0052

0.0837 286

0.0224 279

276

0.0108

0.0216 277

0.0216 278

0.0119 290

0.0654 291

0.0632 292

0.0716 293

0.0076 294 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/ माघ 30, 1926 2

310

11. कारवारी ( जारी )

0.1420

11. कारवारी ( जारी )

308

0.0668

311

0.2978

319

0,0305

318

0.1202

317

0.0959

321

0.0042

323

0.1152

333

0.0432

334

0.0360

332

0,0020

331

0.0040

699

0.1482

352

0.0072

12. घाघरेन

335

0.0214

330

0.2737

329

0.2711

376

0,0504

377

0.0720

0.0108

0.0216

100

0.0216

103

0.0360

104

0.0360

105

0.0432

0.0216

106

107

0.0108

0.0288

108

109

0.0432

110

0.0432

111

0.0360

111/1252

0.0216

112

0.0360

113

0,0216

114

0.0144

183

0.0144

182

0.0108

181

0.0216

115

0.0216

116

0.0216

117

0.0216

179

0.0040

178

0.0108

177

0.0288

176

00504

175

0.0432

0.0288

174/1258

174

0.0216

0.0576

173

172

0.0504

1543 3

4 171

0.0288 170

0.0288 169

0.0144 168

0,0040 205

0.0144 206

0,0504 207

0.0576 208

0,1224 209

0.0288 210

0.0288 212

0.0288 276

0.0108 278

0,0216 2095

0.0864 2094

0.0720 2093

0.0785 2091

0.1080 2084

0.1039 2083

0.0757 2071

0.0845 2072

0.0859 2073

0.1137 2105

0.0253 2033

0.1327 2007

0,0126 2006

0,0903 2004

0,0836 2067

0.1390 2066

0.0354 2065

0.0181 2064

0.1132 2048

0,0078 2047

0,0115 2051

0.1046 2020

0.0152 2038

0.1296 2036

0.1728 2005

0.0195 2097

0.3456 2101

0.2952

0.0576 2152

2154

0.0685 2155

0.0749 2156

0.0306 2157

0.0106 2158

0,0013 1909

0.0762 1910

0.0229 1908

0,0039 1912

0,0936 1544

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

1 2

2 12. घाघरेन ( जारी )

1905

0.0102

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii)]

12. घाघरेन ( जारी )

1904

0.0304

1902

0.0312

1901

0.0574

1895

0.0416

1896

0.0232

1889

0.0361

1888

0.0071

1887

0.0078

1886

0.0103

1885

0.0192

1884

0.0101

1883

0.0307

1881

0.0214

1877

0.0148

1875

0.0318

1871

0.0817

1807

0.0093

1814

0.0243

2034

0.1368 2153

0.0576 1903

0.0072 1890

0.0144 1882

0.0072

0.0432 1876

1792

0.0144 1790

0.0072 1791

0.0144 1754

0.0144 1627

0.0216 1634

0.0020

0.0144 A (कच्ची सड़क)

0.0251 2189 (कच्ची सड़क)

1597

0.0072 1595

0.0144 1603

0.0040 1566

0.0040

0.0879

351

13. सराय भम्बू

1813

0.0149

1809

0.0266

1801

0.0354

347

0.0216

346

0.2016

0.0864

309

14. सिंघाड़ा

1796

0.0216

1783

0.0268

1736

0,0051

1750

0.0530

1751

0.0682

1752

0.0528

1753

0.0322

1626

0,0007

1628

0.0358

1632

0,0359

1631

0.0325

0.0419

1633

1635

0.0464

1614

0.0104

0.0075

1640

1613

0.0968

0.0409

1612

1600

0.0371

1602

0.0419

1596

0.0247

1594

0.0681

1577

0.0284

1576

0.0975

1567

0.0166

1575

0.0446

1573

0,0554

2082

0.0020

2008

0.0072

311

0.0513 1867

0.1041 1866

0.0288

792

0.0040

296

0.0144 1868

0.0432 1834

0.0101 1835

0.0936 1832

0.0432

0.0504 1831

1830

0.0144

0.0432 1829

1703

0.1152

0.0255 1827 (कच्ची सड़क)

0.0483 1706

0.0132 941(कच्ची सड़क)

845

0.0228

0.1296

843

0.0216

842

833

0.0648

0.0967

834

0.0316

835

836

0.0177

823

0.0224

0.0864

828

0.1224

827

0.0276 874(सड़क)

875

0.0108 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30, 1926

886

0.1296

14. सिंघाड़ा (जारी )

16. सिंघन खेड़ा ( जारी )

887

0.0064

17. समोगढ़

885

0.0720

0.0139

272(सड़क)

283

0.0378

284

0.0648

285

0.0139

286

0.1872

290

0.0483

289

0.0356

291

0.1296

292

0.0362

293

0.0792

295

0.0360

294

0.0445

1866/2664

0.0040

850

0.0040

281

0.0020

665

15. सेवला

0.0069

666

0.0184

667

0.0374

668/1043

0.0557

669

0.0459

680

0.0685

681

0,0801

466

0.1000

16. सिंघन खेड़ा

468

0.1184

459

0.0090

458

0.0780

469

0.0383

457

0.1515

450

0.1775

476/505

0.0797

449

0.1018

451

0.0132

445

0.0301

444

0.0232

443

0.0864

441

0.0792

442

0.0036

438

0.1848

437

0,0010

434

0.0975

442/504

0.0072

433

0,1121

431

0.1587

0.0119

430( कच्ची सड़क)

492

0.2360

495

0,0981

470

0.0020

414 G1/2005-11

1545 3

0.0686 496

984

0.0072 985

0.0720 986

0,0020 987

0.1440

0.0648 990

881

0.0576 879

0.0504 878

0.0504 875

0.0360 874

0.0504 876

0.0216 897

0.0144 896

0.0360 899

0.0288

0.0216 900

903

0.0144 894

0.0720 893

0.0040 892

0.0040 906

0.0288 907

0.0504

0.0108 909

0.0432 908

841

0.0360 839

0.0504 840

0.0040

0.0216 838

837

0.0792

0.0288 834

0.0108 833

832

0.0072

0.0108 831

0.0216 821

0.0144 822

823

0.0288

0.0020 819

0,0072 818

0.1080 815

0,2016 488

0.0072 486

0.0288 487

0.0040 476

0.0080 489

0.0576 475

0.1440 528

0.0040 519

521

0.0040

0.0040 522

0.0360 523 1546

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1

4 17. समोगढ़ -(जारी )

526

0.0432

1103

18. नहरोली (जारी )

0.0480 538

0.0720

1101

0.0060 539

0.0040

1104

0.0288 590

0.0216

1105

0.0360 591

0.0576

1106

0.0216 592

0.0140

934

0.0216 593

0.0108

935

0.0288 602

0.0072

1034

0.0216 601

0.0720

939

0.0040 596

0.0140

914

0.0288 597

0.0108

915

0.0216 598

0.0020

912

0.0144 599

0.0432

912/2992

0.0156 600

0.0072

891

0.0216 661

0.0288

0.0216

911

664

0.0432

910

0,0360 666

0.0216

909

0.0936 665

0.0108

908

0.0360 663

0.0216

898

0.0360 667

0.0216

0.0360

897

668

0,0504

893

0.0432 670

0.0288

894

0.0792 671

0.0144

895

0.0060 701

0.0720

965/2996

0.0576 696

0.4392

0.0144

880 (कच्ची सड़क)

700

0.3600

883

0.0288 18. नहरोली

844

0.0719

884

0.0020 836

0.0010

882

0.1440 838

0.1006

877

0.0288 837

0.0576

876

0.0504 817

0.2060

0.0432

872

795

0.1072

863

0.0216 796

0.0200

0.0504

862

797

0.1241

861

0.0504 1185

0.2952

856

0.0040 1040

0.3168

857

0.0576 1039

0.1584

855

0.0864 1047

0.2376

842

0.0040

0.1872

845

0.2016 1046

1114

0.0648

790

0.1137 1091

0.0432

789

0.0020 1092

0.0432

788

0.2190 1093

0.0288

775

0.0012 1094

0.0576

776

0.0429 1087

0.0144

779

0.0148

0.0504

1098

0.0266

777 (कच्ची सड़क)

1099

0.0832

780

0.0163

0.0576

1100

383

0.0432

0.0780

1109

385

0.0088 1108

0.0144

384

(0.1626 11 1547 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

4 1 2

381

0.0030

18. नहरोली ( जारी)

0.0343

19. कोठी खेड़ा (जारी )

0.0505

408

0.1478 404

0,0336

0.0401

0.0351

0.0869 405

786

401

0.0895

0.0778

785

442

0.0615

0.0603

784

447

0.0793

0.0012

779

0.0026 448

0.0876

778

449

0.0111

775

0.0474

0.1216

495

0.1050 451

460

0.0040

496

0.0106

0.0657

0.0228

461

494

462

0.0306

493

0.0698 463

0.0986

522

0.0886

0.0040

464

523

0.0562 467

0.0265

525

0.0236 468

0.0931

524

0.0624 474

0.1020

556

0.0144 475

0.0040

553

0.0719 492

0.0038

555

0.0223 495

0.0855

563

0.0460 496

0,0700

561

0,0286 497

0.0386

566

0.0504

515

576

0.0020

0.0809

516

0.1103

0.0269

577

514

0.0800

0.0648

579

0.0188

513

618

0.0486

0.1203

533

617

0.0118

0.1316

619

535

0.1807

0.0034

541

632

0.0250 539

0,0026

631

0.0542 540

0,0832

630

0.0892 383

0.0300

629

0.0777 493

0.0950

934

0.0799 517

0.0020

0.0922

932

470

0.0100

933

0.1128

0.0763

900

0.0794 19. कोठी खेड़ा

0.0020

903

0.0377

0.0577

901

0.1264

0.0885

646

0.0247

0.0020

902

0.1284

0.0518

904

0.0894

0.0286

930

0.0020

0.0866

929

0.0020

0.0374

0.0020

925 (कच्ची सड़क )

0.0476

0.0020

926 (कच्ची सड़क)

0.0432

0.0288

0.0517

0.0216

0.0828

0.0144

0.0843

4 1548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

1 2

19. कोठी खेड़ा (जारी )

0.0020

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

4 1202

20. शेरगढ़ (जारी )

0.0072

772

0.0360

0.0144

773( कच्चीसड़क)

492

0.0072

526

0.0576

552

0.0432

564

0.0504

581

0,0030

578

0.0072

624

0.0144

896

0.0040

1609

0.1138

20. शेरगढ़

1605

0.0010

1607

0.0413

1616

0.0288

0.0273

A( कच्ची सड़क)

1553

0.0673

1552

0.0144

1551

0.0459

1550

0.1152

1549

0.0144

1547

0.0725

1545

0.1584

0.0720

1559

1544

0.0617

0.0053

1560

0.0779

1543

0.0473

1376

0.0634

1380

1382/2463

0.0432

1397

0.0291

1396

0.0144

0.0657

1398

1399

0.0144

0.0216

1404

0.0215

1400

0.0010

1383

0.0669

1401

0.0498

1402

0.0590

1402/2483

0.1270

1403

0,0083

1409

0.0534

1225

0.0167

1216

0.0609

1414

1415

0.0596

0.0072

1414

1208

0.0833

0.0900

1203

0.0216 1205

0.0244 1195

0.0144 1201

0.0655 1483

0.1405 1416

0.0225 1417

0.0233 1475

0.0144 1412

0.0216 1069

0.0250 1478

0.0355

0.0432 B(कच्ची सड़क)

1411

0.0986 1476

0.0517 1067

0.0504 1494

0.0496 1060

0.1092 1188

0.0360 902

0.0144 1477

0.0432

0.0450 1050

0.0358 1018

1020

0.0633 1019

0.0440 1495

0.0783 1028

0.0144

0.0225 1058

1037

0.0185

0.0140 975

0.0741 977

0.0010 982

0.0144 1048

0.0144 971

972

0.0869

0.0314 658

0.0504 1027

0.0576 930

0.2035 940

936

0.0288

0.0752 939

0.0144 942

0.0144 932/2492

937

0.0216 908

907

0.0216 606

1036

0.0144 974

0.0010 904

0.0422

0.0221 1049 1549 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

888

0.0486

20. शेरगढ़ (जारी )

889

0.0286

0.0468

730

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

0.0216

934

891

0,0203

910

0.0216

909

1021

0.0231

659

0.0244

702

0.0216

703

0.0216

1483

0.0633

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Deepak Nandi, Competent Authority, Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, 1 -C, Balmandir Colony, near Hotel Pink Palace , Sawaimadhopur- 322001 (Rajasthan).

0.0390

705

SCHEDULE

707

0.0388

Tehsil : Bayana District : Bharatpur State: Rajasthan 617

0.0144

Area in Hectare

Survey No.

0.1087

616

Sl. No. Name of Village

618

0.0216

609

0.0072

663

0.0504

1. Dumariya

664

0.0398

0.0216 615

0.0584

662

0.0643

611

661

0,0505

0.0216

612

660

0.0240

0.0424

907/2399

665

0.0144 903

0.0660

0.0838

668

670

0.0222 577/2402

0.0341

669

0.0619 577

0.0720

626

0.0287

0.1153

579

0.0638

637

0,0016

535

0.0335

629

0.0745

534

627

0.0216

628

532

0.0108

0.0260

636

0.0216

0,0731

533

635

0,0159

0.0027

531

630

0.0714 530

0.0418

0,0020

634

0.0057

632

[फा ० सं० आर-31015/79/2004-ओ आर- II ]

0,0634

631

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

609

0.0287 New Delhi , the 14th February, 2005

0.0536

601

0.0236

606

0,0108

604

0.0635

605

0.0445

607

0.0040

580

Government that it is necessary in the public inte for the transportation ofpetroleum products from Manglya (Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, an S.O. 556. Whereas it appears to the Central interest that extension pipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

579

0,0299

0.0860

578

0.0072

577

0.1558

717

0.0573

575

1. Dumariya (Contd .)

0.0040 And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

718 1550

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

2 1

719

0.0648

2. Richholi ( Contd. )

574

0.0220

573

0.0771

571

0.0040

570

0.0504

727

0.0187

0.1653

569

0.0020

568

0.0360

778

2. Richholi

0.0010

779

0.0108

753

762

0.0936

760

0.0020

759

0.0216

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3

0.0072 531

0.0144 471

470

0.1152 466

0.0050 465

0.0360

0.0432 464

0.0072 463

0.0157 462

0.0172 461

0.0432 460

0.0144 453

0.0981 454

0.0555 451

0.0010 1300

3. Pilupura

754

0.0920

758

0.0140

4. Nagla Kurvariya

757

0.0031

0.0612

755

0.0914

710

0.0144

711

712

0.0216

723

0.0040

0.0400

722

0.0335

721

0,0300

714

666

0.0140

665

0.0792

0,0040

664

0.0300

667

668

0.0072

0.0737

669

0.0072

670

0.0150

652

652/837

0.0216

0.0214

653/818

0.0709

653

0.0314

491

0.0010

499

0.0216

497

0.0288

495

0.0080

492

0.1472

493

0,0216

494

0.0432

496

0.0147

519

5. Nagla Khatka

0.1455

526

0.0864

527

0.0020

530

0.0110 1301

0.0479 610

0.1200 561

0.2389 563

0.1923 573

0.1279 574

584

0.1610

0.1096 582

0.0173 454

0.0144 175

0.0504 176

0.0916 177

0.0022 443

0.0087 442

0.1158 179

0.0020 439/622

0.0040 281

0.0393 280

0.1215 279

0.0445 289

0.0669 291

0.0920 292

0.0492 269

0.0826 244

0.0152 237

0.1565 246

0.0020 247

0.0020 236

0.0340 231

0.0683 230

0.0761 223

0.0700 229

0.1096 225

0.1142 363

0.1425 367

0.0703 347

0.1375 348 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1551

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 , 2005/ माष 30, 1926

341

0.1636

5. Nagla Khatka (Contd.)

0.0203

6. Lahchora kalan(Contd. ) 1369

342

0.0851

1360

0.0207 326

0.0147

1361

0.0336 338

0.1368

1367

0.0040

0.0576

329

1362

0.0601 328

0,0080

1363

0.0555

0.0112

399(C/T)

1262

0.0298 89

0.0864

1262/1523

0.0144 88

0.0216

1263

0.0288

0.0360

1384/1584

0,0040 81

0.1351

1390

0.0020 84/797

0.0288

1349

0.0576 84

0.1308

1345/1531

0.0216 83(C/T)

0.0124

1345/1532

0.0648 34

0.0120

1345/1530

0.0040

0.0898

1253

0.0042 32

0.0353

0.0562

1252

0.0253

7. Naroli

1085

0.0357 30

0.0138

0.0244

1029(C/T)

0.0010

979

0.0648 1237

6. Lahchora Kalan

0.0144

978

0.0180 1238

0.0648

970

0.0022 1236

0.0462

977

0.0334

0.0576

1221

971

0.0432 1235

0,0040

975

0.1763 1222

0.0524

976

0,0040 1219

0.0513

462

0.0322

0.0775

1218

461

0.0621 1206

0.0504

457

0.1368 1207

0.0504

458

0.0962 1208

0.0574

459

0.0216 1209

0.0234

478

0.0040 1205

476

0.0108

0.0017 1202

0.0040

477

0.0459 1345

0.0288

479

0.1072 1345/1529

0.0792

482

0.1584 1348

0.0018

0.0708

738

1352

0.0317

737

0,0718 1353

0.0214

736

0.0503 1402/1571

0.0504

725

0.0216 1391

0.1020

0.0792

733(Road)

1387

0.0018

498

0.0110 1386

0.0219

724

0.0010 1385

0.0280

500

0.0433 1384

0.0206

502

0.0288 1388

0.0144

503

0.0621 1383

0.0339

504

0.0154

505

1382

0.0762

0.0261

1381

0.0820

506

0.0202

1380

0.0402

507

0.0106 1552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

511

0.0910

7. Naroli (Contd .)

8. Milakpur ( Contd.)

508

0.0772

512

0.0144

524

0.1368

523

0.0858

0.0059

522

0.0072

517

518

0.0209

0.0144

519(C/T)

0.0717

0,0404

185

184

0.0259

0,1008

181

0.0936

179

180

0.0040

0,0204

178

0.0959

169

0.0648

170(C/T)

0.0570

167

0.1391

171

166

0.0144

168

0.1152

0.1086

124

0.0144

118

0.0733

1439

0.0224

1274

0.2620

1273

1276

0.0792

1275

0.0020

0.0817

1283

0.0131

1217(C/T)

0.0930

1126

1124

0.0175

0.0569

1115

1114

0.0216

1116

0.0576

0.0975

1087

1084

0.0017

1086

0,1008

1441

0.0020

535/2579

0.1728

8. Milakpur

535

0,1440

533

0.1584

0.0108

485(C/T)

0.0272

531

530

0.0492

529

0.1254

0,0785

528

0.0576

527

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 3

4 526

0.0040 517

0.0289 516

0.0040

0.0279 537(C/T)

539

0.1772 110

0.0144 111

0.12% 106

0.0739

0.0040 105

0.0078 104

0.0176 103

0.0258 102

101

0.0252 93

0.0261 92

0.0302 91

0.0247 90

0.0220 86

0.1736 61

0.0771 63

0.0020 58

0.0040 60

0.0397 59

0,0042 47

0.0393

0.0336 46

0,0375

0.0376 31

0.0360 21

0.0504

0.0520 7

0.0720 5

0.0576

0.0020 6

0.0312 776

0.0417 758

0.0534 759

774

0.0166 773

0.0474 760

0.0219 761

0.0239

0.0509 772

0,0010 771

762

0.0504 764

0.0288 768

0.0243

0.0287 738(C/T)

767

0.0864 766

0.1008 667

0.0459 660

0.0475 669

0.0371 1553

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4 2

675

0.0754

303

0.1730 8. Milakpur (Contd . )

9. Bhag Brahmavad (Contd. )

669/2507

0.0212

0.0525

314(C/T)

674

0.0283

316

0.0792 673

0.0020

1106

0.0288 676

0.0288

1107

0.0728 668

0.0504

0.1032

1114

680

0.0080

0.0024

1113

672

0.0648

1116

0.0670 685

0.0099

0.0080

1100(Rail)

0.0725 686

0.1192

1093

699

0.0236

0.0808

1073(C/T)

0.0273 698

0.0678

1066

0.0316 695

0.1350

1024

693

0.1332

0.0024

1023

0.0316

0.0968

601

1022

0.0475

999

602

0.1022

0.0566

0.0020

694

1000

0.1197 604

1001

0.0020

0.0760 700

0.0040

1002

0.0476

0.0360

981

9. Bhag Brahmavad

0.1728 13

969

0.0512

0.0316

0.0544

1024

980

0.0373

0.0437

0.0504 61

979

0.1051

0.0210 60

968

0.0360

0.0616 68

959

0.0144

0.0227

960

0.1177

962

0.0040 70

0.0820

0.0398

961

0.0949

0,0936

966

0.0020

965

0.1315 83

0.0184

0.0958 84

834

0.1038

0.1110 100

991/1224

0.1031

0.0360

903

0.0020

101

0.1224/

974

104

0.1093

969

0.1728

0.0110

102

0.0108

970

0.0886

103

0.0116

112

0.0216

10. Chahal

0.0757

0.0248 133(C/T)

147

0.0024

0.0576

146

0.0728

0.0504

144

0.0216

0.0040 145

0.0288

0,0360

0.0144

149

0.1054

143

0.0434

0.1018 294

0.1073

269

0.0820 295

0.1020

283

0.2088 296

0.0782

0.0742

282

302

0.0360

0.1656

281

305

0.0558

4/14 G1/2005-12 1554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926 1

276

0.0672

10. Chahal ( Contd. )

11. Karvari ( Contd. )

270

0.0540

271

0.0588

272

0.1217

274

0.0040

11. Karvari

213

0.0199

214

0.0218

215

0.0383

216

0.0254

217

0.0240

218

0.0279

219

0.0141

220

0,0450

221/1262

0.0216

221

0.0386

222

0.0463

223

0.0389

224

0.0230

225

0.0020

765

0.0508

764

0.0108

759

0.0919

760

0.360

758

0.0465

757

0.0502

756

0.0536

257

0.1242

744

0.0420

284

0.0504

743

0.0052

286

0.0837

279

0.0224

276

0.0108

277

0.0216

278

0.0216

290

0.0119

291

0.0654

292

0.0632

293

0.0716

0:0076

294

310

0.1420

308

0.0668

311

0,2978

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3

4 319

0.0305 318

0.1202 317

0.0959

0.0042 321

323

0.1152 333

0.0432 334

0.0360 332

0.0020 331

0.0040 699

0.1482 352

0,0072 335

0.0214 330

0.2737 329

0.2711 376

0.0504

0.0720 377

0.0108

0.0216 98

0.0216 100

103

0.0360

0.0360 104

105

0.0432

0.0216 106

0.0108 107

108

0.0288

0.0432 109

0.0432 110

0.0360 111

0.0216 111/1252

112

0.0360

0.0216 113

0.0144 114

0.0144 183

182

0.0108 181

0.0216

0.0216 115

0.0216 116

117

0.0216 179

0.0040 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1555

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 , 2005/माथ 30 , 1926

4 117

0,0216

2101

0.2952 179

0,0040

2152

0,0576

2154

0.0685 178

0.0108

11 Karvari (Contd. )

2155

0.0749

12 Dhadhren (Contd.)

177

0.0288

2156

0.0306 176

0.0504

2157

0.0106 175

0,0432

2158

0.0013 174/1258

0.0288

1909

0.0762 174

0.0216

1910

0.0229

0.0576

173

1908

0.0039 172

0.0504

0.0936

1912

171

0.0288

1905

0.0102 170

0.0288

0.0304

1904

169

0.0144

1902

0.0312 168

0.0040

1901

0.0574 205

0.0144

1895

0.0416 206

0.0504

1896

0.0232 207

0.0576

1889

0,0361

0.1224

208

1888

0.0071 209

0.0288.

1887

0.0078 210

0.0288

1886

0.0103 212

0.0288

1885

0.0192 276

0.0108

1884

0.0101 278

0.0216

1883

0.0307 12 Dhadhren

2095

0.0864

1881

0.0214 2094

0.0720

1877

0.0148 2093

0.0785

1875

0.0318 2091

0.1080

0.0817

1871

2084

0.1039

0.0093

1807

2083

0.0757

1814

0.0243

0.0845

2071

1813

0.0149

0.0859

2072

0.0266

1809

2073

0.1137

1801

0.0354

0.0253

2105

1796

0.0216 2033

0.1327

1783

0.0268 2007

0.0126

1736

0,0051 2006

0.0903

0.0530

1750

2004

0.0836

0.0682

1751

2067

0.1390

1752

0.0528 2066

0.0354

0.0322

1753

2065

0.0181

0.0007

1626

2064

0.1132

1628

0.0358 2048

0.0078

1632

0.0359 2047

0.0115

0.0325

1631

2051

0.1046

0.0419

1633

0.0152

2020

0.0464

1635

0.1296

2038

0.0104

1614

2036

0.1728

0.0075

1640

2005

0.0195

0.0068

1613

2097

0.3456

1612

109 1556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

1600

0.0371

845

0.0228 1602

0.0419

843

0.1296 1596

0.0247

842

0.0216

14. Singhada (Contd . )

1594

0.0681

12. Dhadhren ( Contd .)

833

0.0648 1577

0.0284

834

0.0967 1576

0.0975

835

0.0316 1567

0.0166

836

0.0177 1575

0.0446

823

0.0224 1573

0,0554

0.0864

828

0,0020

2082

827

0.1224 2008

0.0072

0.0276

874(Road)

2034

0.1368

875

0.0108 2153

0.0576

886

0.1296 1903

0.0072

0.0064

887

1890

0.0144

885

0.0720 1882

0.0072

0.0139

272(Road)

1876

0.0432

283

0.0378 1792

0.0144

284

0.0648 1790

0.0072

285

0.0139

0.0144

1791

286

0.1872 1754

0.0144

290

0.0483 1627

0.0216

289

0.0356 1634

0,0020

0.1296

291

0.0144

A(C/T)

292

0.0362

0.0251

2189(C/T)

0.0792

293

0.0072

1597

295

0.0360 1595

0.0144

294

0.0445 1603

0.0040

1866/2664

0.0040 1566

0.0040

850

0.0040

0.0879

351

13. Sarai Bhambu

281

0.0020 347

0.0216

0.0069

665

15. Sewla

0.2016

346

666

0.0184

0.0864

309

14. Singhada

667

0.0374 311

0.0513

0.0557

668/1043

1867

0.1041

0.0459

669

1866

0.0288

0.0685

680

792

0.0040

681

0.0801 296

0.0144

0.1000

16. Singhan Kheda

466

1868

0.0432

468

0.1184 1834

459

0.0101

0.0090

458

0.0780 1835

0.0936

469

0.0383 1832

0.0432

457

0.1515 1831

0.0504

450

0.1775 1830

0.0144

476/505

0.0797 1829

0.0432

449

0.1018 1703

0.1152

451

0.0132

445

0.0301

0.0255

1827(C/T)

444

0.0232

0.0483

1706

443

0.0864

0.0132

941(C/T) 1557 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

438

0.1848

16. Singhan Kheda ( Contd.)

486

0.0072

17 Samogarh (Contd.)

437

0.0010

487

0.0288 434

0.0975

476

0.0040

0.0072

442/504

0.0080

489

433

0.1121

0.0576

475

431

0.1587

528

0,1440

0,0119

430(C/T)

519

0.0040 492

0.2360

0.0040

521

495

0.0981

522

0.0040 470

0.0020

523

0.0360 496

0.0686

526

0.0432 984

0,0072

17. Samogarh

538

0.0720 985

0.0720

0.0040

539

986

0.0020

0.0216

590

987

0.1440

0.0576

591

990

0.0648

592

0.0140

0.0576

881

593

0.0108 879

0.0504

0.0072

602

0.0504

878

601

0.0720 875

0.0360

596

0.0140 874

0.0504

597

0.0108 876

0.0216

0.0020

598

897

0.0144

599

0.0432 896

0.0360

600

0.0072

0.0288

899

661

0.0288 900

0.0216

664

0.0432 903

0.0144

666

0.0216 894

0.0720

665

0.0108 893

0.0040

663

0.0216

0.0040

892

667

0.0216 906

0.0288

668

0.0504

907

670

0.0288

0.0108

909

908

0.0432

671

0.0144 841

0.0360

701

0.0720 839

0.0504

696

0.4392 840

0.0040

700

0.3600 838

0.0216

844

0.0719

18. Nahroli

0.0792

837

836

0.0010

0.0288

834

838

0.1006 833

0,0108

837

0.0576

0.0072

832

817

0.2060 831

0.0108

0.1072

795

821

0,0216

796

0.0200 822

0.0144

797

0.1241 823

0.0288

0.2952

1185

819

0.0020

1040

0.3168 818

0.0072

0.1584

1039

815

0.1080

1047

0.2376

0.2016

488

0.1872

1046 1558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1 2

1114

0,0648

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

4 790

0.1137

18. Nahroli ( Contd. )

18. Nahroli ( Contd .)

1091

0.0432

1092

0.0432

1093

0.0288

0,0576

1094

1087

0.0144

1098

0.0504

1099

0.0832

0,0576

1100

1109

0.0780

1108

0.0144

1103

0.0480

0.0060

1101

1104

0.0288

0.0360

1105

1106

0.0216

934

0.0216

935

0.0288

1034

0.0216

939

0.0040

914

0.0288

915

0.0216

0.0144

912

912/2992

0.0156

891

0.0216

911

0.0216

910

0.0360

0.0936

909

908

0,0360

898

0.0360

897

0.0360

893

0.0432

894

0.0792

895

0.0060

0.0576

965/2996

0.0144

880(C/T)

883

0.0288

884

0.0020

882

0.1440

0.0288

877

876

0.0504

872

0.0432

863

0.0216

862

0.0504

861

0,0504

856

0.0040

0.0576

857

789

0.0020 788

0.2190 775

0,0012 776

0.0429 779

0.0148

0.0266 777(C/T)

0.0163 780

383

0.0432 385

0.0088

0.1626 384

0.0030 381

0.0505 408

0.0336 404

0.0351 405

0.0778 401

442

0,0615 447

0.0012

0.0876 448

0.0111 449

451

0,1216 460

0.0040

0.0228 461

0.0306 462

463

0.0986 464

0.0040

0.0265 467

468

0,0931 474

0.1020 475

0.0040

0,0038 492

495

0.0855 496

0.0700

0.0386 497

0,0020 515

0,1103 516

514

0,0800 513

0.0188 533

0.1203 535

0.1316

0.0034 541

539

0.0026

0.0832 540

383

0,0300

0.0950 493

517

0.0020 470

0.0100

0.0763 3

19. Kothi Kheda

855

0.0864

842

0.0040

0.2016

845

0.0020 5

0.0577 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1559

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30, 1926

901

0.0885

0.1264

19. Kothi Kheda ( Contd.)

0,0020

646

0.0247

0.0518

0.1284

902

0.0286

904

0.0894 11

0.0866

930

0.0020 13

0.0374

929

0.0020

0,0476

0.0020

925(C/T)

0.0432

0.0020

926(C/T)

0.0517

0.0288

0.0828

0.0216 27

0.0843

0.0144 28

0.0343

0.0144 29

0.1478

0.0020 31

0.0401

0.0072 786

0.0869

0.0360

772

785

0.0895

0.0144

773(C/T)

784

492

0.0603

0.0072

0.0576

0.0793

779

526

778

0.0026

552

0.0432 775

564

0.0474

0.0504 495

581

0.0030

0.1050

578

496

0.0106

0.0072 494

0.0657

624

0.0144 493

896

0.0698

0.0040 522

1609

0.0886

0.1138 523

1605

0.0562

0.0010

20. Shergarh !

525

0.0236

1607

0.0413 524

1616

0.0288

0.0624

556

0.0144

0.0273

A(C/T)

553

1553

0.0673

0.0719

555

1552

0.0223

0.0144

1551

563

0.0460

0.0459 561

0,0286

1550

0.1152 566

1549

0.0504

0.0144 576

1547

0.0809

0.0725 577

1545

0.0269

0.1584 579

1559

0.0720

0.0648

618

1544

0.0617

0.0486

617

1560

0.0053

0.0118

1543

0.0779 619

0.1807

1376

0.0473 632

0.0250

1380

0.0634 631

0.0542

1382/2463

0.0432 630

0.0892

1397

0.0291 629

0.0777

1396

0.0144 934

0.0799

0.0657

1398

0.0922

932

1399

0.0144 933

0,1128

1404

0.0216 900

0.0794

1400

0.0215 903

0.0377

1383

0.0010 1560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

1401

0.0669 20. Shergarh (Contd.)

1402

0.0498

1402/2483

0.0590

1403

0.1270

1409

0.0083

1225

0.0534

1216

0.0167

1414

0.0609

1415

0.0596

1414

0.0072

1208

0.0833

1203

0.0900

1202

0.0216

1205

0.0244

1195

0.0144

0.0655

1201

1483

0,1405

0.0225

1416

1417

0.0233

1475

0.0144

1412

0.0216

1069

0.0250

1478

0.0355

0.0432

B( C/T)

1411

0.0986

1476

0.0517

1067

0.0504

0.0496

1494

1060

0.1092

1188

0.0360

902

0.0144

1477

0.0432

1050

0.0450

1018

0.0358

1020

0.0633

1019

0.0440

1495

0.0783

1028

0.0144

1058

0.0225

1037

0.0185

975

0.0140

977

0.0741

0.0010

982

0.0144

1048

971

0.0144

972

0.0869

658

0.0314

0.0504

1027

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 1

930

0.0576 20. Shergarh (Contd. )

940

0.2035

936

0.0288

939

0.0752

942

0.0144

932/2492

0.0144

937

0.0216

908

0.0216

907

0.0216

606

0.0360

1036

0.0144

974

0.0010

904

0.0422

0.0221

1049

888

0.0486

889

0.0286

730

0.0468

934

0.0216

891

0.0203

910

0.0216

909

0.0216

1021

0.0231

659

0.0244

702

0.0216

703

0.0216

0.0633

1483

705

0,0390

707

0.0388

617

0.0144

616

0.1087

618

0.0216

0.0072

609

0.0398

615

0.0643

611

0.0216

612

0.0424

907/2399

0.0660

903

0.0341

577/2402

0.0720

577

0.1153

579

535

0.0016

534

0.0745

532

0.0260

533

0.0731

0,0027

531

0.0418

530

[F. No. R-31015 /79/2004 -OR- II ]

HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

1561 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 305/माघ 30, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

भाग

0.0688

रावुलपालेम देवरपल्लि 107 -जारी- 58/1 भाग

पूर्व गोदवरी

0.0688

58/2 भाग

0.0364

59/1 भाग

0.0364

60/1 भाग

0.0526

60/2 भाग

0.0809

0.0567

54/7 भाग

54/5 भाग

0.0364

53/2 भाग

0.1902

49/4 भाग

0.0040 का.आ. 557.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 414( अ ) ए तारीख 29-03-2004 तथा का.आ. 2270, तारीख 11-09-2004 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल (इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य में ओ.एन.जी.सी. कूप सं. 1 एसे सिरिटेकॉन पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैसके परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

0.1174

49/6 भाग

39/12 भाग

0.0607

0.1012

39/17 भाग और राजपत्र सं. 313 की अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 14-05-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गईं थीं;

39/16 भाग

0.0405

0.2590

40/2 भाग

40/1 भाग

0.0081 और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गयाहै;

59/2 भाग

0.0607

54/6 भाग

0.0202

0.0607

53/1 भाग और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

0.0769

भाग

0.0040

49/10 भाग

0.0121

49/13 भाग

1.6185

कुल

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित हैं , उस में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

[फा. सं.एल-14014/57/03-जी.पी. ] एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निर्देश देती है कि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, पाइपलाइनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल (इण्डिया) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

S.O. 557- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 414 (E) dated 29-03-2004 and S.O. 2270 dated 11-09-2004 issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transport ofNatural Gas through ONGC Well No. 1A to Siritecon pipeline project in the State of Andhra Pradesh by the GAIL (India) Limited;

अनुसूची

जिला

सर्वेनं/

तहसील गाँव

आर.ओ.यू.

And whereas copies of notification of the Gazette No. 313 were made available to the public on the 14-05-2004;

सब

अर्जित करने के

डिविजन लिए क्षेत्रफल

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the competent authority;

(हेक्टेयर में )

नं.

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted its report to the Central Government ;

देवर- 104/3 भाग

0.0121

पूर्व रावुल-

गोदावरी पालेम पल्लि 104/4 भाग

0.1416

And whereas the Central Government has , after considering the said report, decided to acquire the Right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule;

0.0121

105/8 भाग

414 GI /2005-13 1562

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central- Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule is hereby acquired for laying thepipeline;

का.आ. 588.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में सीपीसीएल से चेमप्लास्टहोकर कान्नाप्पान स्टील पाईपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाईपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on this date of the publication of this declaration , in the GAIL (India) Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

Distt. Tehsil Village Survey No./ Sub Division No.

Area to be Acquired forR.O.U.

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

(inHectares)

East

Ravula

104/3 Part

0.0121

Devara-

0,1416

104/4 Part

Godavari palem palli

105/8 Part

0.0121

0.0688

107 Part

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने के सम्बन्ध में विशेष तहसीलदार (आर.ओ.यू. ) एवं सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, कावेरी बेसिन, नागापट्टिनम, तमिलनाडु को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 58/1 Part

0,0688

अनुसूची

58/2 Part

0.0364

सर्वे नं/

जिला तहसील गाँव

आर.ओ.यू.

0.3064

59/1 Part

सब-

60/1 Part

0.0526

डिविजन

60/2 Part

0.0809

नं.

अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में) 54/7 Part

0.0567

54/5 Part

0.0364

53/2 Part

0.01.05

138/5

0.1902

नागा-

0.0040

49/4 Part

124, पानानगुडी

पट्टिनम

नागा- पट्टिनम

49/6 Part

0.1174

0.07.5

138/6

0.0607

39/12 Part

0.03.0

138/7

0.02.0

138/8

0.1012

39/17 Part

138/12

0.02.5

0.0405

39/16 Part

0.01.5

138/13

40/2 Part

0.2590

0.03.0

138/14

0.0081

40/1 Part

0.02.0

138/15

0.01.0

143/1बी

59/2 Part

0.0607

सरकारी भूमि 54/6 Part

0.0202

0.03.0

143/3बी

53/1

0.0607

Part

0.09.0

143/4ए

50 Part

0.0769

0.12.0

143/9

0.13.5

159/2

0.0040

49/10 Part

1.56.0

161/2ए

0.0121

49/13 Parf

सरकारी भूमि TOTAL

1.6185

2.17.5

कुल

[File No. L - 140 14/57/03 -G.P. ]

[फा. सं. एल -14014/15/04- जी.पी. ] S.B. MANDAL , Under Secy .

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 1563 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi ,the 15th February, 2005

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 559.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होताहै कि संघ राज्य क्षेत्र पांडिचेरी में सीपीसीएल से चेमप्लास्ट होकर कान्नाप्पान स्टील पाईपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम पेट्रोलियम गैसके परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

S.O. 558-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum gas through CPCL to Chemplast via Kannappan Steel pipeline project in the State of Tamil Nadu, a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाईपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता हैं कि उस भूमि में, उक्त पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals popeline ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty -one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Special Tehsildar ( R.O.U. ) and Competent Authority , GAIL ( India) Limited , Cauvery Basin , Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu .

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमिके नीचे पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने के सम्बन्ध में विशेष तहसीलदार (आर.ओ.यू. ) एवं सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, कावेरी बेसिन, नागापट्टिनम, तमिलनाडु लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

SCHEDULE

अनुसूची

Distt. Tehsil Village Survey No.

जिला तहसील गाँव

Area to be acquired for ROU( in Hectare)

सर्वेनं/ सब डिविजन नं.

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में) 138/5

0.01.5

124, Panangudi

Naga- pattinam

138/6

0.07.5

0.12.5

पांडिचेरी कारैकाल 37, वान्जोर 2/2

138/7

0.03.0

सरकारी भूमि 138/8

0.02.0

0.10.0

0.02.5

138/12

0.04.0

7/2

138/13

0.01.5

सरकारी भूमि

0.03.0

138/14

0.13.5

7/3

0.02.0

138/15

0.07.5 143/1 B

0.01.0

Govt. Plot

सरकारी भूमि 143/3 B

0.03.0

14/2

143/4A

0.09.0

0.03.5 सरकारी भूमि 143/9

0.12.0

14/3

0.03.5 159/2

0.13.5

सरकारी भूमि 161/2A

1.56.0 Govt . Plot

0.04.5

15/4

2.17.5

Total

0.03.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.48.0

19/ए 1

[File No. L - 14014/15/04 -G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director 1564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/ MAGHA 30 , 1926

0.00.5 पांडिचेरी कारैकाल 37 , वान्जोर 19/बी

0.03.5

19/डी

0.06.0

20/1 ए

20/1 बी

0.01.0

0.01.5

20/ 2बी

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ]

sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Special Tehsildar (R.O.U. ) and Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited , Cauvery Basin , Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu.

SCHEDULE

District Tehsil

0.00.5

20/3 ए

0.00.5

33/5

सरकारी भूमि

33/6

0.09.5

34/1

0.06.5

0.00.5

34/3

सरकारी भूमि

34/4

0.09.0

0.24.0

36/1

1.73.0

कुल

0.12.0

36, केजइ- 75/2

यूर दक्षिण

0.05.0

75/3

78/3

0.04.05

78/4

0.03.0

78/5

0.01.5

78/6

0.01.0

सरकारी भूमि

0.27.0

कुल

[फा. सं. एल-14014/15/04- जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005

S.O. 559. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum gas through CPCL to Chemplast via Kannappan Steel pipeline project in the Union Territory of Pondicherry, a pipeline shouldbe laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;

And,whereas it appears to the Central Gocvernment that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one- days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Village Survey

No.

Arca to be acquired for ROU (In Hectare)

0.12.5 Karai-

Pondi-

2/2

kal 37,

Govt. Plot

chery

Vanjore

0.10.0

7/2

0.04.0

Govt. Plot

7/3

0.13.5

0.07.5

Govt. Plot

0.03.5

14/2

14/3

0,03,5

Govt. Plot

0.04.5

15/4

0.03.0

Govt. Plot

0.48.0

19/A1

0.00.5

19/B

0.03.5

19/D

0.06.0

20/1A

0.01.0

20/1 B

0.01.5

20/2B

0.00.5

20/3A

0.00.5

33/5

Govt. Plot

0.09.5

33/6

34/1

0.06.5

34/3

0.00.5

Govt. Plot

34/4

0.09.0

36/1

0.24.0

TOTAL

1.73.0

0.12.0 36 , Kezai- 75/2

yur South

75/3

0.05.0

78/3

0.04.05

0.03.0

78/4

78/5

0.01.5

0.01.0

78/6

Govt. Plot

TOTAL

0.27.0

[F. No. L- 14014/15/ 04-G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director 1565 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 560.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोक हित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उडिसा राज्य में पारादीप से पश्चिमी वंगाल राज्य में हल्दिया तक कच्चे तेल के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन विछाने जानी चाहिए,

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि जिसके भितर पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में बर्णित है, में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ,

अतः, अव , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइल ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशाय की घोषणा करती है ,

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनूसुची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के अन्दर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री अरविन्द घोष , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , पारादीप हल्दिया पाइपलाइन परियोजना , इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड , कसबेरिया , डाकघर- खंजनचक, पूर्व मिदनापुर-721602 (पश्चिमी बंगाल ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 1566

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

अनुसूची पुलिस थाना : एगरा

जिला: पूर्वमिदनापुर गाँव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या प्लॉट संख्या

(2)

(3)

(4) (1)

पानिपारुल

203

538

539

540

542

543

550

551

563

564

565

566

609

610

611

612

621

623

624

636

640

642

647

650

655

657

659

735

745

750

751

752

754

755

784

790

791

792

793

808

1273

1274

2794

2795

2795/8973

745/8901

794/8911

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] राज्य: पश्चिमी बंगाल

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर एयर

(5)

( 6)

16 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1567

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

(2)

(3) (1)

8881

8891

8893

202

176 लालपुर

180

181

182

183

185

192

193

185/1027

361

201

खुरुटिया

363

364

367

368

370

371

373

397

398

401

362/1471

191

9629 दुबदा

11501

2120

259

बासुदेबपुर

2121

3847

3848

3849 पुलिस थाना - रामनगर

वाधिया

694

695

696

697

701

710

701/4341 पुलिस थाना - मारिशदा

134

55 हाटियारी

(5)

( 6) (4)

43 00

38654782035 41 00

44 55554 00

2715 77 19

20 00

70 00

40 00

00 00

2020208

41 00

55 57466664 00

79 15504070

27 00

34 2024 00

44 00 1568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

( 5)

(6)

[फा. सं. आर-25011/ 13/2005- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005

S. O. 560.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum ( crude) from Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia in the State of West Bengal , a pipeline should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited ,

And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ,

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its internition to acquire the right of user therein ,

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Arabinda Ghosh , Competent Authority, Paradip Haldia Crude Oil Pipeline Project , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Kasberia , Post Office- Khanjanchak , Purba Midnapur - 721602 (West- Bengal ).

i [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii)]

1569

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

Schedule

State:West-Bengal

District: PurbaMidnapur

PoliceStation:Egra

NameofVillage

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Hectare

Plot. No.

(2)

( 3)

(4) (1)

538

203

Paniparul

539

540

542

543

550

551

563

564

565

566

609

610

611

612

621

623

624

636

640

642

647

650

655

657

659

735

745

750

751

752

754

755

784

790

791

792

793

808

1273

1274

2794

2795

2795/8973

745/8901

794/8911

00 414 GI /2005-14

Area

Are SquareMetre

(6)

(5)

01 1570

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

(2)

(1)

( 3)

(4)

8881

8891

8893

202

176

00 Lalpur

180

181

182

183

185

192

193

00 ৪৪

185/1027

201

361

00 Khurutia

363

364

367

368

370

371

373

397

398

401

362/1471

00 Dubda

191

9629

11501

259

2120

Basudebpur

2121

3847

3848

00 00 00

3849

PoliceStation - Ramnagar

694

Badhia

695

696

697

701

710

701/4341

Police Station - Marishda

Hatiari

134

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] ( 5 )

( 6)

44 2035664 01

44 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

1571 ( 1)

( 2)

(3)

(4)

( 5)

( 6 )

[No. R-25011/13/2005- O.R. - I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 561.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनयम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी और भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 2466 तारीख 28 सितम्बर , 2004 द्वारा उड़ीसा राज्य में पारादीप से पश्चिमी बंगाल राज्य में हल्दिया तक इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा कच्चे तेल के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन विछाने के प्रयोजन हेतु उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मे विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशाय की घोषणा की थी ।

और , उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता की तारीख 19-10-2004 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना है ।

अतः, अव , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार पाइपलाइनें विछाए जाने हेतु अर्जित किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भुमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड मे निहित हौगा । 1572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य: पश्चिमी बंगाल पुलिस थाना: नन्दकुमार

जिला : पूर्वमिदनापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या प्लॉट संख्या हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

92 71

शीतलपुर

2045 1982

पुलिस थाना: चण्डीपुर

563

गोमुठा

564

20 पुलिस थाना : भुपतिनगर

22 156

4858

किसमत बाजकुल

26 326

वजयनगर

1746/2353

11 240

2832/3321

जुखिया

पुलिस थाना: मारिशदा

180/499

61 शिवपुर बेलतलिया

180/500

पुलिस थाना : एगरा

201

1242

खुरुटिया

191

9629

96 दुबदा

202

184/1027

51 लालपुर

[फा. सं. आर-25011/20/2004-ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005

S. O. 561.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2466 dated the 28th September , 2004 , issued under sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of crude oil from Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia in the State of West Bengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited ;

And whereas , the copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 19-10-2004 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

1573

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30,1926

And whereas , the competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report to the Central Government ;

And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report , is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by the sub -section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

Schedule

State:West-Bengal

District: Purba Midnapur

PoliceStation: Nandakumar

NameofVillage

- Jurisdiction ListNo.

Plot. No.

(3 )

(2)

(1)

Sitalpur

2045 1982 PoliceStation - Chandipur

Gomutha

563 564 PoliceStation - Bhupatinagar

4858

156

Kismatbajkul

1746/2353

326

Bijoynagar

2832/3321

240

Jukhia

PoliceStation - Marishda

Shibpurbeltalya

180/499 180/500

Area Are SquareMetre Hectare

( 6 )

(5)

( 4)

92 37

06 00

00 00

87 20

00 00

61 74

06 05

00 1574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] (2 )

(1)

( 3)

(4)

(.5)

(6) Police Station - Egra

Khurutia

201

1242

91 Dubda

191

9629

96 202

184/1027

Lalpur

[No. R - 25011 /20/2004-O.R. - I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 17 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 562. केन्द्रिय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इंडस्टीज लिमीटेड है , के गोवा के उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट (ऑफसोर ) में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य की संरचनाओ से महाराष्ट्र राज्य में , अहमदनगर जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड व्दारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत्त होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबध्द अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिं में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) व्दारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबध्द है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस . डी. भिसे, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड पाइपलाइन परियोजना , टी/ 23 , टेल्को रोड , गवळी माथा के पास , एमसीसीआई अॅण्ड ए के सामने , 411026 महाराष्ट्र राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

भोसरी, पुणे

1 1575

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

जिल्हा: अहमदनगर

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक : कर्जत

गाँव कानाम

राज्य: महाराष्ट

सर्वे नं / गट नं

224/1

1) शेगुडवाडी

224/2

186

185/1

185/2

179

180

177

189

174

172

166

164

157

139

163

147

143

144

141

140

138

सर्वे नंबर 174 में फिल्ड चैनल

सर्वे नंबर 139 में कॅनाल

159

2) खातगाव

158

155

154

319

3) आंबीजळगाव

320

321

322

326

327

329

330

भार आंधु अर्पित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर

एर सिएर

71 00

17 00

39 00

32 00

86 00

34 00

47 00

93 00

27 00

85 00

66 00

16 00

13 00

60 00

41 00

10 00

25 00

85 00

66 00

65 00

77 00

05 1576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

331

3) आंबीजळगाव ( निरंतर )

332

334

246

249

250

248

सर्वे नंबर 248 और 230 के बीच का नाला

230

214

182

181

180

173

176

174

सर्वे नंबर 173 और 136 के बीच का रास्ता

142

136

सर्वे नंबर 136 और 135 के बीच का रास्ता

135

134

130

129

सर्वे नंबर 128 और 97 के बीच का रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 128 और 97 के बीच का कॅनाल

179

214

4) कोरेगाव

210

216

209

217

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 3

5 00

26 00

04 00

55 00

57 00

08 00

81 00

08 00

65 00

40 00

78 00

40 00

89 00

01 00

25 00

10 00

23 00

60 00

75 00

14 00

00 00

50 00

00 00

50 00

00 00

50 00

00 00

46 00

39 00

98 01

सर्वे नंबर 217 और 260 के बीच का रास्ता

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

2 1

260

4) कोरेगाव (निरंतर )

261

320

316

319

317

318

327

309

310

308

307

306

305

286

131

5) कुर्मफल

133

134

135

137

138

139

140

सर्वे नंबर 140 और 151 के बीच का रास्ता

151

153

156

155

159

160

161

253

6) बेनवाडी

254

255

285/1

285/2

282

283/1

283/2

280/1

278

404

403

414 GI/2005-15

1577

5 3

53 00

75 00

40 00

45 00

73 00

35 00

57 00

30 00

14 00

91 00

44 00

49 00

86 00

78 00

43 00

00 00

53 00

80 00

10 00

66 00

96 00

75 00

90 01

96 00

62 00

04 00

82 00

26 00

34 00

05 00

15 00

00 1578

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

405

6) बेनवाडी (निरंतर )

408

401

सर्वे नंबर 40 1में कॅनाल

396

395

392

389

388

387

386

373

374

371

370

368

366

365

364

363

सर्वे नंबर 363 और 362 के बीच का नाला

362

348

349

359

358

357

355

354

353

352

351

सर्वे नंबर 351 और 336 के बीच का ग्रास पॅच

336

सर्वे नंबर 351 और 336 के बीच का राजमार्ग-

334

सर्वे नंबर 334 और 253 के बीच का नाला

615/3

7) थेरवाडी

615/4

615/2

615/1

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 3

5 00

79 00

19 01

62 00

44 00

00 00

57 00

23 00

93 00

30 00

10 00

59 00

78 00

94 00

55 00

92 00

02 00

83 00

67 00

57 00

95 00

79 00

43 00

95 00

56 00

22 00

35 00

63 00

सर्वे नंबर 615/1 और 35 के बीच का रास्ता

00 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

2 1

7) बेरवाडी ( निरंतर )

82/1

1579 3

5 00

10 00

84 00

21 00

सर्वे नंबर 82/1 और 84 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

13 00

सर्वे नंबर 199, 200 और 34 के बीच का नाला

199

196/1

195/1

194/1

193/1

191/2

191/1

191/3

200

179

34 00

38 00

60 00

23 00

31 00

37 00

सर्वे नंबर 191/3 और 187 के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

187

186

185/1

185/3

185/4

38 00

13 00

20 00

सर्वे नंबर 185/4 और 181 के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

181

183

182

सर्वे नंबर 164 और 277 के बीच का रास्ता

277

278

279

284/1

284/2

283

475/2

8) दूरगांव

सर्वे नंबर 475/2 में गाडी रास्ता

474

480

05 00

63 00

86 00

44 00

26 00

84 00

56 00

23 01

78 00

08 00

28 1580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

471

8) दूरगांव ( निरंतर)

472

469

468

467

466

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

55 00

50 00

13 00

35 00

44 00

सर्वे नंबर 466 और 491 के बीच का नाला

491

492

636/1

635/3

635/4

सर्वे नंबर 635/3 में डे, न 00

09 00

31 00

45 00

83 00

सर्वे नंबर 635/3 और 635/2 के बीच का

रास्ता

635/2

635/1

512

511

सर्वे नंबर 511 में फिल्ड चॅनल

510/2

508

509

522

524

525

526

442

9) पिंपळेवाडी

सर्वे नंबर 442 में फिल्ड चॅनल

सर्वे नंबर 442 में कॅनाल

170

सर्वे नंबर 170 में गाडी रास्ता

175

सर्वे नंबर 175 में कॅनाल

176

177

194

196

195

211/1

219

210

209

208

85 00

07 01

85 00

50 00

38 00

96 00

60 00

82 01

90 00

75 00

91 00

24 00

26 00

81 00

97 00

50 00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

2 1

147

9) पिंपळेवाडी ( निरंतर )

सर्वे नंबर 147 में कॅनाल

217

476

10) कुळधरण

478

477

569

568

567

566

564

सर्वे नंबर 564 और 558 के बीच का नाला

558

557

604

605

606

सर्वे नंबर 606 और 603 के बीच का कॅनाल

603

602

सर्वे नंबर 602 में गाव रार्ता-26

668

669

670

672

674

सर्वे नंबर 674 और 676 के बीच का नाला

सर्वे नंबर 674 और 676 के बीच का रास्ता

676

सर्वे नंबर 676 में नाला

753

सर्वे नंबर 753 और 766 के बीच का रास्ता

766

767

768

769

सर्वे नंबर 769 और 791 के बीच का कॅनाल

791

833

832

सर्वे नंबर 832 और 786 के बीच का कॅनाल

786

1581

62 01

09 00

27 00

95 00

98 00

92 00

25 00

66 00

10 00

46 00

91 01

13 00

83 00

93 00

45 01

91 00

79 00

17 00

46 00

26 00

02 00

82 00

33 1582

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

834

10) कुळधरण ( निरंतर )

835

सर्वे नंबर 835 में गाडी रास्ता

826

825

सर्वे नंबर 824 और 822 के बीच का नाला

824

822

821

820

871

सर्वे नंबर 871 में कॅनाल

850

863

862

868

190

11) राक्षसवाडी खुर्द

192

सर्वे नंबर 192 में कॅनाल

189

193

सर्वे नंबर 193 में कॅनाल

188

187

185

सर्वेनंबर 185 और 184 के बीच का कॅनाल

184

161

162

163

164

160

165

152

151/2

151/1

सर्वे नंबर 151/1 में नाला

सर्वे नंबर 7 में गाडी रास्ता

PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

5 3

81 00

29 00

35 00

17 00

87 00

26 00

07 00

53 00

20 00

26 CO

15 00

67 00

24 00

04 00

06 00

89 00

00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

2 1

11) राक्षसवाडी खुर्द (निरंतर )

सर्वे नंबर 17 और 3 के बीच का गाव रास्र्ता-20

411

150

गाव सीमा के पास का नाला

जिल्हा: अहमदनगर मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: श्रीगोंदा

375

1) चांडगाव

293

सर्वे नंबर 342 और 293 के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

342

341

344

सर्वे नंबर 344 में नाला

340

332

सर्वे नंबर 332 में कॅनाल

331

333

सर्वे नंबर 331 और 328 के बचि का कॅनाल

328

सर्वे नंबर 328 और 327 के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

364

327

326

324

322

321

323

313

320

सर्वे नंबर 320 में कॅनाल

319

318

317

सर्वे नंबर 317 और 66 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 66 और 63 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

1583

5 3

53 00

86 00

44 00

31 00

राज्य: महाराष्ट

20 00

29 00

01 02

29 00

31 00

89 00

96 00

51 00

81 00

84 00

79 00

09 00

74 00

34 00

00 1584

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

1) चांडगाव ( निरंतर )

सर्वे नंबर 63 में नाला

374

377

गाव सीमा के पास का गाडी रास्ता

2) टाकळी कडेवालीत

सर्वे नंबर 12 और 436 के बीच का रास्ता

436

434

सर्वे नंबर 434 और 358 के बीच का नाला

358

357

356

355

354

353

352

351

350

349

348

सर्वे नंबर 348 और 346 के बीच का नाला

346

347

371

344

343

342

341

340

339

338

337

336

319/5

सर्वे नंबर 319/ड और 318 के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

318

388

304

315

305

306

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

5 3

95 00

79 00

42 00

91 00

42 00

17 00

88 00

14 00

13 00

72 00

52 00

49 00

72 00

50 00

64 00

95 00

52 00

93 00

40 00

47 00

54 00

61 00

66 00

11 00

32 00

28 01

04 1585

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

307

2) टाकळी कडेवालीत ( निरंतर )

सर्वे नंबर 307 और 269 के बीच का रास्ता

269

268

267

266

गाव सीमा के पास का गाडी रास्ता

33/अ

3) भिंगाव

सर्वेनंबर 33/अ और 33/ ब के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

33/ब

35/2

सर्वे नंबर 39 के पास का देव नाला

4) चोराचीवाडी

सर्वे नंबर 2 में रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 1 में रास्ता

सचे नंबर 1 में रास्ता

130

129

5 00

95 00

93 00

23 01

97 00

83 00

59 00

51 00

18 00

37 00

48 00

76 00

98 01

50 00

सर्वे नंबर 129 और 102 के बीच का मुख्य जिला

रास्ता-74

102

103

108

सर्वे नंबर 96 में रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 95 और 94 के बीच का कॅनाल

65 01

06 00

21"

54 00

45 00

29 00

02 00

सर्वे नंबर 93 और 91 के बीच का कॅनाल

5) वेलू

414 Gl /2005-16

87 00

82 00

06 1586

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

5) वेलू ( निरंतर )

सर्वे नंबर 22 और 1 के बीच का रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 22 और 1 के बीच का नाला

सर्वे नंबर 2 और 1 के बीच का रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 7 और 8 के बीच का नाला

सर्वे नंबर 29 और 30 के बीच का कॅनाल

213

6) लिंफ्णगाव

214

251

258

257

229

230

253

223

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

20 00

40 00

86 00

05 00

39 00

08 00

57 00

62 00

45 00

58 00

12 00

85 00

30 00

50 00

84 00

95 00

23 00

सर्वे नंबर 223 और 222 के बीच का कॅनाल

222

215

सर्वे नंबर 211 और 299 के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

132

79 00

05 00

सर्वे नंबर 128 और 117 के बीच का रास्ता

117

252

207

216/1

209

212

254

228

30 00

72 00

48 00

52 00

00 1587 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

4 1

114

28 6) लिंपणगाव ( निरंतर )

116

115

133

273

272

सर्वे नंबर 272 और 207 के बीच का कॅनाल

सर्वे नंबर 216 और 215 के बीच का कॅनाल

सर्वे नंबर 215 और 204 के बीच का कॅनाल

204

256

सर्वे नंबर 254 और 256 के बीचका कॅनाल

255

227

सर्वे नंबर 230 और 134 के बीच का रास्ता

134

सर्वे नंबर 132 और 127 के बीच का रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 117 और 27 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 32 और 22 के बीच का कॅनाल

सर्वे नंबर 32 और 22 के बीच की बराड गेज

मध्यरेल

सर्वे नंबर 32 और 22 के बीच का कॅनाल

सर्वे नंबर 32 और 22 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

51 7) जंगलवाडी

सर्वे नंबर 4 और 5 के बीच का नाला

43/1

सर्वे नंबर 43/1 और 33 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 35 और 40 के बीच का कॅनाल

सर्वे नंबर 56 और 91 के बीच का कॅनाल

सर्वे नंबर 56 और 91 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

33 1588

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

7) जंगलवाडी ( निरंतर )

77/1

77/4

77/3

77/2

सर्वे नंबर 77/2 के पास का कॅनाल

660

8) काष्टी

661

656

641

642/3

642/2

610

611

614

सर्वे नंबर 614 और 532 के बीच का

राजमार्ग-10

532

531

530

सर्वे नंबर 530 में फिल्ड चॅनल

529

सर्वे नंबर 529 में गाडी रास्ता

391/2

392/2

389/1+ 2 )

389/3

386

387/4

387/3

387/1

सर्वे नंबर 387/1 में गाडी रास्ता

177/2

177/4

177/1

178

179

189

188

187

सर्वे नंबर 187 में गाडी रास्ता

184

186

सर्वे नंबर 186 और 150 के बीच का नाला [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

82 00

33 00

98 00

05 00

66 00

46 00

97 00

30 00

41 00

57 00

46 00

515 00

27 00

91 00

56 00

33 00

59 00

33 00

08 00

62 00

26 00

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1589 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 / माघ 30,1926

2 .

150

12 8) काष्टी (निरंतर )

सर्वे नंवर 50 में रास्ता

151/1/1ar

151/2

सर्वे नंबर 151/2 में गाडी रास्ता

153

सर्वे नंबर 153 में गाडी राहता

154

सर्वे नंबर 154 में गाही रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 154 में गाड़ी रास्ता

155

644

[फा. सं. एल-14014/55/2004-जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th February, 2005

S. O. 562.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from the exploration blocks in the Northern/Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/ s . Reliance Industries Limited , the promoter company of M/s. Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of Ahmednagar District in the State of Maharashtra, a pipelin should be laidby M/ s . Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the tright of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri . S. D. Bhise, Competent Authority, M/s. Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project , T/23 , Telco Road , Near Gavali Matha, Opp MCCI &A, Bhosari , Pune-411 026 , Maharashtra State, 1590

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

Schedule

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] State: Maharashtra

District:Ahmednagar

Mandal/Thesil /Taluk : Karjat

Village

Survey No./Gat No.

224/1

1) Shegudwadi

224/2

186

185/1

185/2

179

180

177

189

174

172

166

164

157

139

163

147

143

144

141

140

138

Areato beacquired for Rolu Hectare Are C-Are

5 3

71 00

17 00

39 00

47 00

66 00

34 00

42 00

93 00

27 00

85 00

16 00

21 00

60 00

FieldChannel in Survey No. 174

Canal in Survey No. 139

159

2) Khatgaon

158

155

154

319

3) Ambijalgaon

320

321

322

326

327

329

41 00

25 00

75 00

85 00

66 00

19 00

77 00

62 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

2 1

330

3) Ambijalgaon (Contd....)

331

332

334

246

249

250

248

Nala in between Survey No. 248

and230

230

214

182

181

180

173

176

174

Road in between Survey No. 173

and136

142

136

Road in between Survey No. 136 and 135

135

134

130

129

Road in between Survey No. 128

and97

1591 3

05 00

26 00

55 00

17 00

57 00

81 00

08 00

22 00

65 00

78 00

35 00

68 00

89 00

25 00

10 00

13 00 02

60 00

75 00

50 00

Canal in between Survey No. 128

and97

179

214

4)Koregaon

210

00 00

78 00

00 00

50 00

00 00

01 00

30 1592

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

216

4) Koregaon(Contd....)

209

217

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Road inbetween Survey No. 217

and 260

260

261

320

316

319

317

318

327

309

310

308

307

306

305

286

131

5) KumbhePhal

133

134

135

137

138

139

140

Road in between Survey No. 140

and151

151

153

156

159

160

161

253

6) Benwadi

254

255

285/1

285/2

282

i 1593

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

283/1

6) Benwadi (Contd....)

283/2

280/1

278

404

403

405

408

401

5 00

51 00

26 00

45 00

19 00

Canal in Survey No.401

396

395

392

389

388

387

386

373

374

371

370

368

366

365

364

363

44 00

26 00

00 00

94 00

57 00

23 00

24 00

93 00

10 00

85 00

78 00

Nala inbetween Survey No. 363

and 362

362

348

349

359

358

357

355

354

353

352

351

55 00

11 00

87 00

81 00

83 00

04 00

57 00

79 00

Grass Patch in between Survey

No. 351 and 336

336

StateHighway 38 in between

Survey No. 351 and 336 414 Gl /2005-17 1594

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

2 1

334

6) Benwadi (Contd....)

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

5 3

95 00

Nala in between Survey No. 334

and 253

615/3

7) Therawadi

615/4

615/2

615/1

Road inbetween SurveyNo.

615/1 and 35

82/1

73 00

22 00

35 00

63 00

56 00

78 00

10 00

08 00

39 00

CartTrack in between Survey

No. 82/1 and 84

Nala inbetween SurveyNo.

199, 200 and 34

199

196/1

195/1

194/1

193/1

191/2

191/1

191/3

200

179

43 00

34 00

48 00

38 00

56 00

80 00

37 00

55 00

CartTrack inbetween Survey

No. 191/3 and 187

187

186

185/1

185/3

185/4

84 00

CartTrack in between Survey

No. 185/4 and 181

181

183

182

63 00

86 00 1595

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

2 1

7) Therawadi(Contd....)

90 00

Road in between Survey No. 164

and 277

277

278

279

284/1

284/2

283

475/2

8) Durgaon

44 00

84 00

56 00

23 00

78 00

CartTrack in Survey No. 475/2

474

480

471

472

469

468

467

466

Nala in between SurveyNo.

466 and 491

491

492

636/1

635/3

635/4

15 00

55 00

50 00

64 00

44 00

47 00

09 00

07 00

Drain in Survey No. 635/3

Road in between Survev No..

635/3 and 635/2

635/2

635/1

512

511

83 00

06 00

07 01

70 00

FieldChannel in Survey No. 511

510/2

508

509

522

524

525

526

442

9) Pimpalwadi

57 00

38 00

96 00

10 00

20 01

Field Channel in Survey No. 442

Canal in Survey No. 442

170

61 01 1596

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 9) Pimpalwadi (Contd .... )

CartTrack in Survey No. 170

175

Canal in Survey No. 175

176

177

194

196

195

211/1

219

210

209

208

147

Canal inSurvey No. 147

217

476 10) Kuldharan

478

477

569

568

567

566

564

Nala inbetween Survey No. 564

and558

558

557

604

605

606

Canal inbetween Survey No. 606

and603

603

602

VillageRoad-26 in SurveyNo.

602

668

669

670

672

674

Nala inbetween Survey 674 and

676

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

91 00

74.

81 00

50 00

80 00

73 00

48 00

98 01

98 00

25 01

00 00

66 00

10 00

20 00

96 00

41 01

82 00

08 00

03 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005 /माघ 30,1926

2 1

1597 3

19 00

Roadin between Survey No. 674

10) Kuldharan(Contd....)

and 676

676

Nala in Survey No. 676

753

58 00

45 00

Road in between Survey No. 753

and 766

766

767

768

769

53 00

09 00

79 00

17 00

Canal in between Survey No. 769

and 791

791

833

832

26 00

Canal in between Survey No. 832

and 786

786

834

835

CartTrack in Survey No. 835

826

825

Nala inbetween Survey No. 824

and 822

824

822

821

820

871

Canalin Survey No. 871

850

863

862

868

190

11) Rakshaswadi Khurd

192

Canal in Survey No. 192

189

193

Canal in Survey No. 193

188

187

27 00

58 00

29 00

00 00

77 00

33 00

17 00

26 00

07 00

67 00

74 00

53 00

33 00 1598

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

185

11) Rakshaswadi Khurd (Contd ....)

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

20 00

26 00

Canal in between Survey No. 185

and 184

184

161

162

163

164

160

165

152

151/2

151/1

Nala in Survey. No.151/1

CartTrack in Survey No. 7

VillageRoad-20 in between Survey No. 17 and 3

411

150

Nala at VillageBoundary

01 00

60 00

61 00

15 00

56 00

67 00

47 00

28 00

24 00

04 00

06 00

89 00

53 00

86 00

56 00

44 00

31 00

38 00

Maharashtra State:

District: Ahmednagar

Mandal /Thesil/Taluk : Shrigonda

375

1) Chandgaon

293

17 00

20 00

CartTrack in between Survey

No. 342 and 293

342

341

344

Nala in Survey No. 344

340

332

Canal in Survey No. 332

89 00

29 00

51 01

20 00

09 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

331

1) Chandgaon(Contd....)

333

1599

5 3

58 00

Canal inbetween Survey No. 331

and328

328

31 00

CartTrack inbetween Survey

No. 328 and 327

364

327

326

324

322

321

323

313

320

96 00

51 00

13 00

06 00

Canal in Survey No. 320

319

318

317

09 00

74 00

CartTrack inbetween Survey

No. 317 and 66

34 00

54 00

CartTrack inbetween Survey

No. 66 and63

Nalain-Survey No. 63

374

377

64 01

95 00

39 00

33 00

CartTrack atVillage Boundary

2) Taklikadewalit

79 00

91 00

Road inbetween Survey No. 12

and 436

436

434

42 00

Nalain between Survey No. 434

and 358

358

357

356

355

354

353

352

88 00

14 00

86 00

13 00

72 00

17 1600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

351

2) Taklikadewalit ( Contd .... )

350

349

348

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

5 3

91 00

Nala inbetween Survey No. 348

and346

346

347

371

344

343

342

341

340

339

338

337

336

319/D

CartTrack in between Survey

No. 319/D and 318

318

388

304

315

305

306

307

Road inbetween SurveyNo.

307 and 269

269

268

267

266

49 00

50 00

64 00

58 00

53 00

75 00

52 00

93 00

40 00

66 00

11 00

28 01

95 00

33 00

23 00

31 01

CartTrack atVillage Boundary

33/A

3) Bhingaon

CartTrack in between Survey

No. 33/A and 33/B

33/B

35/2

18 01

83 00

27 00

59 00

49 00

51 00

04 00 1601

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

37 00

DevNala Near Survey No. 39

3) Bhingaon (Contd.... )

4) Chorachiwadi

Road in Survey No. 2

Road inSurvey No. 1

Road in Survey No. 1

130

129

39 00

52 00

56 00

24 00

MajorDistrict Road-74 in

between Survey No. 129 and 102

102

103

108

Road in Survey No. 96

06 01

54 00

Canal in between Survey No. 95

and94

Canal in between Survey No. 93

and91

5) Velu

87 00

62 01

72 00

35 00

20 00

Road inbetween Survey No. 22

and 1

40 00

Nala in between Survey No. 22

and 1

86 00

Road in between Survey No. 1

and 2

05 00

34 00

39 00

57 00

Nala inbetween Survey No. 7

and 8

62 00

Canal inbetween Survey No. 29

and 30

414 GI/2005-18 1602

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

2 1

213

6) Limpangaon

214

251

258

257

229

230

253

223

[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

45 00

12 00

85 00

50 00

07 00

84 00

29 00

Canal in between Survey No. 223

and 222

222

215

CartTrack inbetween Survey

No. 211 and 299

132

96 00

78 00

79 00

05 00

Road in between Survey No. 128

and 117

117

252

207

216/1

209

212

254

228

114

116

115

133

273

272

46 00

34 00

89 00

28 00

52 00

63 00

90 00

78 00

Canal in between Survey No. 272

and 207 00

Canal in between Survey No. 216

and 215

64 00

Canal inbetween Survey No. 216

and 215 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

Canal in between Survey No. 215

6) Limpangaon (Contd....)

and 204

204

256

Canal in between Survey No. 254

and 256

255

227

Road in between Survey No. 230 and 134 134

Road in between Survey No. 132

and 127

CartTrack in between Survey No. 117 and 27

Canal in between Survey No. 32 and 22

Broad Gauge Central Railway in between SurveyNo. 32 and 22

Canal in between Survey No. 32 and 22

CartTrack inbetween Survey No. 32 and 22

7) Jangalewadi

Nala in between Survey No. 4

and 5

43/1

CartTrack inbetween Survey

No. 43/1 and 33

Canal inbetween Survey No. 35

and40

Canal in between Survey No. 56 and 91

CartTrack inbetween Survey No. 56 and 91

77/1

1603 3

33 00

72 00

64 00

70 00

38 00

62 00

21 00

62 00

87 00

90 00

19 00

27 00

76 00

46 00

70 00

74 00

16 00

82 00

25 1604

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

2 1

77/4

7) Jangalewadi (Contd.... )

77/3

77/2

Canal Near Survey No. 77/2

660

8) Kashti

661

656

641

642/3

642/2

610

611

614

StateHighway-10between Survey No. 614 and 532

532

531

530

[ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

5 3

33 00

96 00

51 00

66 00

70 00

46 00

97 00

41 00

24 00

57 00

48 00

51 00

Field Channel in Survey No. 530

529

CartTrack in Survey No. 529

391/2

392/2

389/1 +(2A)

389/3

386

387/4

387/3

387/1

81 00

27 00

56 00

33 00

CartTrack in Survey No. 387/1

177/2

177/4

177/1

178

179

189

188

187

CartTrack in Survey No. 187

184

186

45 00

92 00

80 00

Nala in between Survey No. 186

and 150

150

12 00 1605 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

Road in SurveyNo. 150

86 8) Kashti (Contd .... )

151/1 /1A

151/2

CartTrack in Survey No. 151/2

153

CartTrack in SurveyNo. 153

154

CartTrack in Survey No. 154

155

644

[F. No. L- 14014/55/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 17 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 563.-केन्द्रिय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इंडस्टीज लिमीटेड है, के गोवा के उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट (ऑफसोर) में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य की संरचनाओं से महाराष्ट्र राज्य में , पुणे जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड व्दारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबध्द अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिं में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) व्दारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबध्द है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस . डी. भिसे, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड पाइपलाइन परियोजना , टी/ 23, टेल्को रोड , गवळी माथा के पास , एमसीसीआई अॅण्ड ए के सामने , भोसरी, पुणे 411026 महाराष्ट्र राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 1606

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

अनुसूची

जिल्हा: पुणे मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: शिरूर

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नं / गट नं 1

गाव के सीमा के पास की नदी 1) इनामगाव

सर्वे नंबर 57/4 में गाडी रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 57/4 में नाला

57/4

57/2

57/1

57/3

57/6

सर्वे नंबर 58 में गाडी रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 41 और 61/2 के बीच का रास्ता

61/2

61/1

63/1

63/2

सर्वे नंबर 63/2 में गाडी रास्ता

65/1

65/2

66/2अ

66/1अ

68/2

68/1

68/34

68/3अ

सर्वे नंबर 68/3अ में गाडी रास्ता

69/1

69/2

70/3

70/2

347/131

सर्वे नंबर 10 में नाला

सर्वे नंबर 10 में गाडी रास्ता

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य: महाराष्ट,

आर ओयु अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफळ हेक्टर

एर

सिएर

5 3

03 00

00 00

20 00

77 00

47 00

36 00

28 00

40 00

76 00

61 00

55 00

91 00

85 00

04 00

56 00

49 00

55 00

91 00

30 00

26 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1607

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005 /माघ 30,1926

2 1

458/5

1) इनामगाव (निरंतर )

457/1

457/4

457/3

471/2

472/2ब

472/1अ2

472/2अ

472/1अं

473

5 3

16 00

93 00

43 00

90 00

सर्वे नंबर 473 और 474 के बीच का रास्ता

474

475

476/1

476/2

476/3

478/2

478/3

478/1

479

513

512

510

506

507

508

519/1

519/2

520/2

521/2

सर्वे नंबर 521/2 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

522/3

522/2

522/4

523

524/1

525/1

525/3/2

525/7

525/6अ

76/111

2) पिंपळखुटी

40/3

30 00

27 00

17 00

06 00

38 00

03 00

79 00

01 00

17 00

-00

83 00

12 00

16 00

01 00

31 00

25 00

सर्वे नंबर 76/111 और 40/3 के बीच का कॅनाल

40/5

13 1608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

42/1

2) पिंपळसुटी ( निरंतर )

42/3

76/2/2

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 3

57 00

06 00

28 00

सर्वे नंबर 74 और 156/1 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

156/1

150

149

148

145/1

144

143

142

139

138/अ/14

138

176

90 00

07 00

11 00

71 00

06 00

96 00

06 00

52 00

95 00

55 00

सर्वे नंबर 176 और 185/1 के बीच का कॅनाल

185/1

सर्वे नंबर 185/1 और 185/2 के बीच का रास्ता

185/2

188/1

189

190

191

192/1अ

192/ 1 व

192/2

251

250/2

255

248

सर्वे नंबर 258/1 में गाडी रास्ता

258/1

258/2

259/1

399

261/3

243/2/1

243/1/2

261/4

96 00

10 00

85 00

36 00

98 00

21 00

64 00

02 00

23 00

49 00

सर्वे नंबर 261/4 और 242 के बीच का कॅनाल

242

42 1609

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

241

2) पिंपळसुटी ( निरंतर )

240

238/1

238/2

237/4

237/2

239

गाव के सीमा के पास का गाडी रास्ता 3) शिरसगांव काटा

405

404/2

404/1

409

400/1

400/1 / 1 फ

71 00

36 00

94 00

61 00

01 00

15 00

सर्वे नंबर 400/1/1 फ और 410 के बीच का नाला

410

413

414/4/1

414/4/2

417

418

416

415

397

396/2

81 00

09 00

61 00

22 00

सर्वेनंबर 396/2 और 253/2 के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

253/2

253/3

253/1

252

251/ 2+4

249/1

248/1थ

248/13/1

245/2

245/1

244

241

242

240

269

114

115

414 GI /2005-19

11 00

02 00

21 00

29 00

59 00

37 00

00 00

62 00

99 00

00 1610

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30. 1926

2 1

119/1

3) जिग्मगांव काटा ( निरंतर )

119/2

118

120

सर्वे नंबर 120 और 121/1 के बीच का मुख्य

जिला मार्ग-100

121/1

121/2

122

123/2/1

123/2/2

123/14/2/1

123/14/1

124

994

99अ

136

137

140

138

139/1

139/2

1.43

144/3

144/1

144/2

144/4/1/2 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

99 00

92 00

02 00

71 00

73 00

49 00

98 00

63 00

34 00

72 00

62 00

89 00

00 00

सर्वे नंबर 144/4/1/2 और 167 के बीच का गाव

रास्ता-117

167

168

169

170

174

175/3

178/8

178/7

178/4

178/5

178/3

178/2

178/1

178/6

178/1अ

178/9/2

38 00

11 00

87 00

07 00

10 00

40 00

00 00

79 00

26 00

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1611

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30,1926

2 1

180

3) शिरसगांव काटा (निरंतर )

181

182

183

186/अ/3

184

185

186/ब/2

187/1

187/3

51 00

50 00

24 00

48 00

सर्वे नंबर 187/3 और 544 के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

544

543

562

563/1

563/2

563/3

564

सर्वे नंबर 564 और 565/2 के बीच का नाला

565/2

565/2/1

4) कोळगाव डोळस

10/3

10/ब

10/क

10/अ

9/2अ

9/1

सर्वे नंबर 9 और 157 बीच का रास्ता

157

158

सर्वे नंबर 158 में नाला

159/2

159/1

160/14 1

सर्वे नंबर 160/141 में रास्ता

161/ब

सर्वे नंबर 161 /ब में नाला

161/अ

132/1/1

72 00

36 00

47 00

74 00

22 00

06 00

20 00

02 00

73 00

39 00

.00

39 00

70 00

93 00

91 00

79 00

00 444 1612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

132/1/2 4) कोळगाव डोळस ( निरंतर )

131/13/1अ

131/13/14

131/13/1क

सर्वेनंबर 131/13/1 क और 95/4 के बीच का

नाला

95/4

95/2

सर्वे नंबर 101/1/1 में डे, न

सर्वे नंबर 101/1/1 में गाडी रास्ता

101/1/2

102

100

109/1

110

111

112

336/2

5) आंधळगाव

336/1

337-

सर्वे नंबर 336 और 338 के बीच का रास्ता

338

342

329

328

327

326/1

325/2

324

सर्वे नंबर 325/2 और 322 के बीच का नाला

322

306

6) काकडेवाडी

307

309

310/2

312

315

313

314

363

गाव सीमा के पास का रास्ता

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

60 00

32 00

96 00

35 00

87 00

85 00

06 00

50 00

23 00

64 00

69 00

83 00

07 भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

सर्वे नंबर 313 और 300/3 के बीच का गाडी 6) काकडेवाडी ( निरंतर )

रास्ता

300/3

297

296

295

294

299

293

सर्वे नंबर 293/2 और 361 के बीच का नाला

361

364/1

सर्वे नंबर 364/1 और 364/2 के बीच का रास्ता

364/2

गाव सीमा के पास का रास्ता 7) आलेगांव पागा

568/1अ

गाव सीमा के पास का गाडी रास्ता

448/3

8) न्हावरे

448/1

447

सर्वे नंबर 447 और 443 के बीच की सरकारी

जमीन

443

सर्वे नंबर 443 और 649 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

649

648

647

645

644

6430

सर्वे नंबर 643 पै और 713 के बीच का रास्ता

713

710

709

708

सर्वे नंबर 708 और 704 के बीच का रास्ता

1613 3

5 00

16 00

68 00

00 00

08 00

25 00

50 00

79 00

91 00

27 00

71 00

20 00

12 00

14 00

00 00

66 00

58 00

45 00

75 00

59 00

सर्वे नंबर 708 और 704 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

704

705

706

707

699

सर्वे नंबर 699 और 735 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता 00

56 00

66 00

84 00

00 1614

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/ MAGHA 30 , 1926

735

8) हावरे ( निरंतर )

736

737

755

753

सर्वे नंबर 753 और 777 के बीच का नाला

777

सर्वे नंबर 777 और 780 के बीच की सरकारी

जमीन

780/2

780/3

780/1

794

795

796

807

नाला और सर्वे नंबर 870 के बीच की सरकारी

जमीन

सर्वे नंबर 796 के पास का नाला

108

9) उरळगाव

सर्वे नंबर 94 और 91 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 69 और 45 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 45 और 43 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 44 और 177 के बीच का नाला

177

178

सर्वे नंबर 178 में रास्ता

179

सर्वे नंबर 179 में रास्ता

220

210

PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

64 00

72 00

88 01

77 00

96 00

01 00

12 00

65 01

74 00

31 00

76 00

64 00

48 00

31 DO

42 00

56 00

23 00

35 00

01 00

32 00

44 00

57 00

26 00

01 01

12 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1615

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

2 1

211

9) उरळगाव (निरंतर )

237

215

216

214

24 01

03 00

53 00

27 00

59 00

सर्वे नंबर 214 और 366 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

366

367

361

360

359

सर्वे नंबर 359 और 464 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

464

सर्वे नंबर 464 में नाला

465

466

467

468

469

470

471

476

475

114

113

112

111

88 00

57 00

74 00

21 00

15 00

47 00

54 00

15 00

10 00

47 00

74 00

सर्वे नंबर 111 और 107 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

107

गाव सीमा के पास का गाडी रास्ता 10) दहिवडी

305

304

28 00

23 00

99 00

71 00

सर्वे नंबर 304 और 306 के बीच का नाला

306

सर्वे नंबर 306 में गाडी रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 315 में गाडी रास्ता

315

316

06 00

25 00

11 00

सर्वे नंबर 316 और 333 के बीच का नाला

333

346

345

344

343

36 00

77 00

69 00

29 00

03 1616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

342

10) दहिवडी (निरंतर )

341

336

337

437

गाव सीमा के पास का नाला

11) पारोडी

191

188

सर्वे नंबर 36 में नाला

189/1

189/2

सर्वे नंबर 250 में रास्ता

190

सर्वे नंबर 250 और 192 के बीच नाला

सर्वे नंबर 188 और 43 के बीच का रास्ता

192

250

गाव सीमा के पास का नाला 12) शिवतक्रार म्हाळुंगी

सर्वे नंबर 53 और 47 के बीच का रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 46 और 42 के बीच का नाला

गाव सीमा के पास का गाडी रास्ता PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

08 00

29 00

91 00

00 00

07 00

95 00

91 00

81 00

77 00

76 00

62 00

51 00

13 00

36 00

31 00

360

31 00

1.7 00

06 00

05 00

02 00

27 00

21 00

70 00

80 00

83 00

76 00

62 00

19 00

48 00

80 00 1617

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005 /माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii)]

2 1

797

13) टाकळीभिमा

796

792/4

792/3

789

791

790

सर्वे नंबर 790 में गाडी रास्ता

5 3

72 00

29 00

46 00

58 00

00,

20 00

सर्वेनंबर 633 और 790 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

633

सर्वे नंबर 633 में नाला

632

सर्वे नंबर 632 और 621 के बीच का रास्ता

621

620

619

618

617

816

615

614

613

5794

601

607

604

598

597

595

588

594

589

590

591

34 00

86 00

41 00

33 00

31 00

70 00

46 00

76 00

92 00

12 00

11 00

55 00

89 00

42 00

72 00

65 00

42 00

78 00

सर्वे नंबर 591 और 518/1 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

518/1

518/2

517

515

514

501

500

414 G1 /2005-20

00 00

15 00

22 00

34 00

48 00

18 1618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

2 1

493

13) टाकळी भिमा ( निरंतर )

492

491

469

467

466

465

464

463

448/ 2अ

448/ 2ब

448/1

447

446

445

416पै

415

396/ 2व

396/2अ

396/1

393

सर्वे नंबर 393 में कॅनाल

392

391

390

सर्वे नंबर 390 में नाला

389

388

596/1

14) कासारी

595/1

607

606

605

604

सर्वे नंबर 604 में कॅनाल

627

634

633

644

635

636

सर्वे नंबर 636 में गाडी रास्ता

641

642

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

90 00

07 00

47 00

09 00

43 00

48 00

11 00

75 00

16 00

00 00

76 00

73 00

89 00

91 00

46 00

02 00

26 00

58 00

22 00

03 00

77 00

78 00

71 00

32 00

92 00

63 00

01 00

30 00

51 00

99 00

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30, 1926

2 1

643

14) कासारी (निरंतर)

686

684

687

688

689

685

691

692

683

1080

1081

1082

1084

1085

1102

सर्वे नंबर 1102 और 1133 के बीच का नाला

1133

1134

1135

1136

1137/1

1138

1139

1140

सर्वे नंबर 1140 और 1142 के बीच का कॅनाल

1142

1143

1144

1145

1146

1197

1199

1200

सर्वे नंबर 1200 और 1248 के बीच का इतर

जिलामार्ग-67

1248

1266

1267

1268

1269

1270

1271

1272

1619

5 3

80 00

09 00

84 00

00 00

82 00

94 00

97 00

90 00

34 00

79 00

09 00

79 00

71 00

16 00

09 00

96 00

09 00

84 00

42 00

93 00

80 00

36 00

50 00

00 00

50 00

10 00

40 1620

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

423

15) तळेगाव ढमढेरे

435

437

438

440

443

444

445/1

446

449

452

454

455

456

457

458

461

459

460

463

472

475

477

476

47.9

483

484

गाव सीमा के पास का रास्ता

रस्ता और सर्वे नंबर 1804 के बीच की सरकारी

जमीन

1804

सर्वे नंबर 1804 में कॅनाल

1802

सर्वे नंबर 1802 में रास्ता

सर्वे नंबर 1802 में नाला

1186

1184

1183

सर्वे नंबर 1183 और 329 के बीच का रास्ता

329

330

331

334

335

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

94 00

53 00

06 00

45 00

78 00

70 00

50 00

23 00

63 00

81 00

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1621

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005 /माघ 30, 1926

2 1

336

15) तळेगाव ढमढेरे ( निरंतर )

337

338

339

342

343

344

345/1

346

347

348

353

358

359

360

361

362

363

364

सर्वे नंबर 364 और 365 के बीच का कॅनाल

365

385

386

390

391

392

395

399

398

28 00

33 00

26 00

38 00

82 00

05 00

61 00

91 00

50 00

72 00

18 00

19 00

29 00

13 00

78 00

42 00

67 00

95 00

सर्वे नंबर 398 और 417 के बीच की सरकारी

जमीन

417

418

421

422

1258

16)शिक्रापुर

1259

56 00

39 00

16 00

सर्वे नंबर 1259 और 1260 के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

1260

1261

1190

46 00

16 00

सर्वे नंबर 1190 और 1751 के बीच की नदी

1751

1274

51 1622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

1273

16) शिक्रापुर ( निरंतर )

1283

1309

1308

1306

1784

1809

1810

1811

1812

सर्वे नंबर 1812 और 1303 के बीच का नाला

1303

1304

1367

1366

1365

1374

1376

1377

1380

1381

1845

1384

सर्वे नंबर 1384 और 1361 के बीच का नाला

1361

सर्वे नंबर 1361 और 1572 के बीच का राजमार्ग

-55

1572

1574

1573

1584

1585

1586

1588

1591

1593

1592

1596

1595

1597/3

1597/2

सर्वे नंबर 1597 और 1599 के बीच का राजमार्ग

-55

1599

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

75 00

23 00

54 00

61 00

66 00

31 00

78 00

52 00

53 00

48 00

71 00

39 00

49 00

16 00

49 00

0 ..

53 00

33 00

つつ

73 00

00 .

92 00

56 00

24 00

29 00

80 00

32 00

01 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005 /माघ 30, 1926

2 1

1623

5 3

36 00

सर्वे नंबर 1599 और 1902 के बीच का गाडी

16) शिक्रापुर ( निरंतर ) .

रास्ता

1902

42 00

सर्वे नंबर 1902 और 2130 के बीच का नाला

2130

10 00

सर्वे नंबर 2130 और 1650 के बीच का नाला

1650

1651

1652

1455

33 00

25 00

सर्वे नंबर 1455 और 1658 के बीच की सरकारी

जमीन

62 00

सर्वे नंबर 1455 और 1661 के बीच की सरकारी

जमीन

1658

1661

1662

1663

1666

1667

1668

1669

1670

1671

1672

1673

1674

1677

1678

1679

1680

1681

1284

1285

1742

1293

1294

63 00

75 00

63 00

39 00

96 00

66 00

64 00

67 00

80 00

96 00

12 00

07 00

55 00

45 00

51 00

सर्वे नंबर 1294 और 1313 के बीच का राजमार्ग

-55

1313

1312

1311

1310

22/1

17) जातेगाव खुर्द

19 00

65 00

21 00

01 00

13 1624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

17) जातेगाव खुर्द ( निरंतर )

32/3

32/1

32/2

सर्वे नंबर 32/2 और 34 के बीच का रास्ता

474

49/1

सर्वे नंबर 50 और 51 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

60/1

60/3

68/2

68/1

92/1

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

12 00

59 00

21 00

42 00

31 00

55 00

84 00

52 00

14 00

35 00

07 00

16 00

36 00

60 00

89 00

27 00

26 00

31 00

02 00

72 00

58 00

11 00

81 00

04 00

05 00

76 00

15 1625

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

15/माघ 30,1926

17) जातेगाव खुर्द ( निरंतर )

93/2

93/1

102

107

110/1अ

110/2अ

110/ 1 ब

110/2ब

110/4

110/3

693

18) करंदी

सर्वे नंबर 693 में डे, न

692

694

19 .

सर्वे नंबर 694 और 695 के बीच का रास्ता

695

सर्वे नंबर 695 और 691 के बीच का कॅनाल-

691

690

689

685

684

776

सर्वे नंबर 776 में गाडी रास्ता

775

सर्वे नंबर 775 और 773 के बीच का गाव

रास्ता-53

773

सर्वे नंबर 73 में कॅनाल

सर्वे नंबर 73 में गाडी रास्ता

772

770

767

765/1/2

765/1/1अ

766

909

910

911-

912

414Gl/ 2005-21 1626

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

गाव सीमा के पास का नाला 18) करंदी ( निरंतर )

915/1

19) पिंपळे जगताप

सर्वे नंबर 915/1 और नाला के बीच का नाला

सर्वे नंबर 915/1 में नाला

902

901

900

899

898

897/1

897/2

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

5 3

62 00

26 00

11 00

26 00

24 00

54 00

सर्वे नंबर 897/2 और 884 के बीच का राजमार्ग

-55

884

885

890/1

94 00

66 00

सर्वे नंबर 890/1 और 890/2 के बीच का कॅनाल

890/2

882

881

गात सीमा के पास का रास्ता

414

20) कजेवाडी

सतें नबर 418 में नाला

418पै

सर्वे नंबर 418 पै और 415 के बीच का नाला

415

416

421

411

422

सर्वे नंबर 411 और 403 के बीच का कॅनाल

403

399

400

398

397

396

393

389

388

387

386

385

384

32 00

29 00

52 00

17 00

00 00

90 00

40 00

19 00

09 00

13 00

53 00

49 00

70 00

02 1627 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

383

05 20) वाजेवाडी ( निरंतर )

381

380

377

37.6--

375

374

373

372

369

368

364

363

361

357

358

सर्वे नंबर 358और 353 के बीच का गाडी रास्ता

353

[फा. सं. एल-14014/48/2004- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th February , 2005

S. O. 563.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from the exploration blocks in the Northern/Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/s. Reliance Industries Limited , the promoter company of M/s . Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of Pune District in the State of Maharashtra , a pipeline should be laid by M/s . Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this rnotification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri . S. D. Bhise, Competent Authority, M/s . Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project, T/23 , Telco Road, Near Gavali Matha , Opp MCCI &A, Bhosari , Pune 411 026 , Maharashtra State, 1628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

Schedule

District: Pune Mandal/Thesil/Taluk : Shirur

Survey No./Gat No.

Village

2 1

RiveratVillage Boundary 1) Inamgaon

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] State: Maharashtra

Area to be acquired for Rou

C-Are Hectare Are

5 3

00 00

CartTrack near Survey No. 57/4

Nala in Survey No. 57/4

57/4

57/2

57/1

57/3

57/6

Cart Track in Survey No. 58

20. 00

77 00

26 00

70 00

47 00

40 00

76 00

RoadbetweenSurvey No. 41

and 61/2

61/2

61/1

63/1

63/2

61 00

67 00

22.

08 00

Cart Track in Survey No. 63/2

65/1

65/2

66/2A

66/4A

68/2

68/1

68/3B

68/3A

91 00

85 00

56 00

01 00

CartTrack in Survey No. 68/3A

69/1

69/2

70/3

70/2

347/1A1

Nala in Survey No. 10

CartTrack in Survey No. 10

458/5

49 00

55 00

91 00

30 00

26 00

16 00

30 1629

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

457/1

1) Inamgaon (Contd....)

457/4

457/3

471/2

472/2B

472/1A2

472/2A

472/1A

473

86 00

25 00

93 00

64 00

86 00

28 00

Roadbetween Survey No. 473

and474

474

475

476/1

476/2

476/3

478/2

478/3

478/1

479

513

512

510

506

507

508

519/1

519/2

520/2

521/2

30 00

83 00

98 00

46 00

06 00

38 00

03 00

10 00

08 00

98 00

01 00

12 00

75 00

CartTrack in Survey No. 521/2

522/3

522/2

522/4

523

524/1

525/1

525/3/2

525/7

525/6A

76/1A1

2) Pimpalsuti

40/3

Canal betweenSurvey No.

76/1A1 and 40/3

40/5

42/1

73 00

56 00

12 00

91 00

62 00

16 00

01 00

31 00

42 00

57 1630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

42/3 2) Pimpalsuti ( Contd ....)

76/2/2

CartTrackbetween Survey No.

74 and 156/1

156/1

150

149

148

145/1

144

143

142

139

138/A/1B

138

176

Canalbetween Survey No. 176

and 185/1

185/1

Roadbetween Survey No. 185/1

and 185/2

185/2

188/1

189

190

191

192/1A

192/1B

192/2

251

250/2

255

248

CartTrack in Survey No. 258/1 .

258/1

258/2

259/1

399

261/3

243/2/1

243/1/2

261/4

Canal between Survey No. 261/4

and 242

242 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

26 00

06 00

17 00

09 00

11 00

06 00

14 00

96 00

06 00

52 00

95 00

55 00

89 00

54 00

09 00

68 00

70 00

93 00

67 00

85 00

94 00

21 00

64 00

02 00

50 00

92 00

23 00

49 00

18 00

42 1631

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

241

2) Pimpalsuti (Contd ....)

240

238/1

238/2

237/4

237/2

239

5 3

55 00

32 00

20 00

CartTrack atVillage Boundary

3).Shirasgaon Kata

405

404/2

404/1

409

400/1

400/1/1f

Nala between SurveyNo.

400/1/1F and 410

410

413

414/B/1

414/B/2

417

418

416

415

397

396/2

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

396/2 and 253/2

253/2

253/3

253/1

252

251/2+4

249/1

248/1B

248/1A/1

245/2

245/1

244

241

242

240

269

114

115

119/1

94 00

01 00

05 00

73 00

47 00

62 00

50 00

61 00

18 00

11 00

02 00

21 00

28 00

29 00

37 00

66 00

77 00

00 00

75 00

63 00

30 1632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

2 1

119/2

3) Shirasgaon Kata (Contd....)

118

120

MajorDistrict Road-100 between Survey No. 120 and 121/1

121/1

121/2

122

123/2/1

123/2/2

123/18/2/1

123/18/1

124

99B

99A

136

137

140

138

139/1

139/2

143

144/3

144/1

144/2

144/4/1/2

Village Road- 117. between Survey No. 144/4/1/2 and167

167

168

169

170

174

175/3

178/8

178/7

178/4

178/5

178/3

178/2

178/1

178/6

178/1A

178/9/2

180

181

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

69 00

67 00

02 00

71 00

73 00

95 00

40 00

98 00

63 00

14 00

34 00

58 00

89 00

70 00

06 00

00 00

59 00

38 00

11 00

41 00

87 00

00 00

79 00

26 00

01 00

60 00

00 1633 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 ,

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

/माघ 30 , 1926

5 1

182

3) Shirasgaon Kata ( Contd .... )

183

186/A/3

184

185

186/B/2

187/1

187/3

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

187/3 and 544

544

543

562

563/1

563/2

563/3

564

Nala between Survey No. 564

and 565/2

565/2

565/2/1

4) Kolagaon Dolas

12.

10/D

10/B

10/C

10/A

9/2A

9/1

Road between Survey No. 9 and

157

158

Nala in Survey No. 158

159/2

159/1

160/1B1

Road in Survey No. 160/1B1

161/B

Nala in Survey No. 161 /B

161/A

132/1/1

132/1/2

131/1A/1A

414 G1/2005-22 1634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

2 1

131/1A/1B 4) Kolagaon Dolas (Contd .... )

131/1A/1C

Nalabetween SurveyNo.

131/1A/1C and 95/4

95/4

95/2

Drain in Survey No. 101/1/1

CartTrack in Survey No. 101/1/1

101/1/2

102

100

109/1

110

111

112

336/2

5)Andhalgaon

336/1

337

Roadbetween Survey No. 336

and 338

338

342

329

328

327

326/1

325/2

324

Nalabetween Survey No. 325/2

and 322

322

306

6) Kakadewadi

307

309

310/2

312

315

313

314

363

RoadatVillageBoundary

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

313 and 300/3

300/3

297

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 00

32 00

01 00

96 00

35 00

99 00

34 01

11 00

66 00

56 00

85 00

17 00

60 00

51 00

85 00

98 00

50 00

87 00

39 00

64 00

21 00

22 00

16 00

96 00 1635

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

2 1

296

6)Kakadewadi(Contd....)

295

294

299

293

5 3

68 00

00 00

Nala between Survey No. 293/2

and361

361

364/1

63 00

21 00

Roadbetween Survey No. 364/1

and 364/2

364/2

7) Aalegaon Paga

44 00

Road atVillageBoundary

568/1A

82 00

50 00

CartTrack at Village Boundary

448/3

8)Nhavare

448/1

447

90 00

82 00

91 00

Government Land between

Survey No. 447 and443

443

CartTrackbetween Survey No.

443and 649

649

648

647

646

645

644

643P

27 00

71 00

14- 00.-

66 00

Roadbetween Survey No. 643P

and713

713

710

709

708

58 00

45 00

75 00

Roadbetween Survey No. 708

and704

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

708 and 704

704

705

706

707

699

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

699and735

735

88 00

56 00

66 00

03 00

53 1636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

736

8) Nhavare(Contd....)

737

755

753

Nala between Survey No. 753

and 777

777

Government Land between Survey No. 777 and 780

780/2

780/3

780/1

794

795

796

807

Government Land between Survey No. 870 and Nala Nala near Survey No. 796

108

9) Uralgaon

CartTrackbetween Survey No.

94 and91

63.

CartTrackbetween Survey No.

69and45

CartTrackbetween Survey No.

45and43

Nalabetween Survey No. 44

and 177

177

178

Road in Survey No. 178

179

Road in Survey No. 179

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

72 00

52 00

88 01

77 00

89 00

01 00

45 00

80 00

60 00

61 00

31 00

76 00

64 00

48 00

09 00

42 00

11 00

23 00

85 00

49 00

32 00

44 00

57 00

41 01

26 00 1637

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

220

9) Uralgaon(Contd....)

210

211

237

215

216

214

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

214and 366

366

367

361

360

359

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

359and464

464

76 00

01 01

24 01

53 00

59 00

76 01

93 00

37 00

57 00

Nala in SurveyNo.464

465

466

467

468

469

470

471

476

475

114

113

112

111

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

111 and 107

107

15 00

47 00

54 00

92 00

18 00

84 00

47 00

74 00

77 00

28 00

CartTrack atVillage Boundary

10) Dahiwadi

305

304

99 00

79 00

Nalabetween Survey No. 304

and306

306

66 00

CartTrack in Survey No. 306

31 00

CartTrack in Survey No. 315

315

316

25 00

11 00

NalabetweenSurvey No. 316

and 333

333

36 1638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

346

10) Dahiwadi (Contd ....)

345

344

343

342

341

336

337

437

NalaatVillage Boundary

11) Parodi

191

188

Nala in Survey No. 36

189/1

189/2

Road in Survey No. 250

190

Nalabetween Survey No. 250

and 192 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

60 00

08 00

29 00

00 00

95 00

81 00

77 00

71 00

01.

69 00

62 00

55 00

13 00

31 00

RoadbetweenSurvey No. 188

and43

192

250

12) Shiv takrar Mahalungi

Nala atVillage Boundary

Roadbetween Survey No. 53

and47

00-

04 00

50 00

78 00

83 00

62 00

19 00

39 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

Nalabetween SurveyNo. 48 12) Shiv takrar Mahalungi (Contd .... )

and 42

CartTrackat Village Boundary

797

13) Takli Bhima

796

792/4

792/3

789

791

790

CartTrack in SurveyNo. 790

CartTrack in Survey No. 790

CartTrack in Survey No.790

Government Landbetween Survey. No. 633 and 790

633

Nala in SurveyNo. 633

632

Roadbetween SurveyNo. 632

and 621

621

620

619

618

617

616

615

614

613

579P

601

607

604

598

597

595

588

594

589

590

591

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

591 and 518/1

518/1

518/2

1639

5 3

48 00

72 01

07 00

47 00

58 00

52 00

34 00

86 00

41 00

33 00

46 00

18 00

76 00

92 00

12 00

89 00

72 00

65 00

42 00

33 00

78 00

15 1640

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

517 13) Takli Bhima (Contd.... )

515

514

501

500

493

492

491

469

467

466

465

464

463

448/2A

448/2B

448/1

447

446

445

416P

415

396/20

396/2A

396/1

393

Canal in Survey No. 393

392

391

390

Nala in Survey No. 390

389

388

596/1 14) Kasari

595/1

607

606

605

604

Canal in Survey No. 604

627

634

633

644

635 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

05 00

22 00

34 00

76 00

48 00

01 00

90 00

47 00

43 00

48 00

11 00

06 00

,00

$76 00

73 00

27 00

89 00

91 00

46 00

91 00

26 00

58 00

77 00

71 00

26 00

63 00

01 00

22 भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

35/माघ 30,1926

2 1

636

14) Kasari (Contd....)

CartTrack in Survey No. 636

641

642

643

686

684

687

688

689

685

691

692

683

1080

1081

1082

1084

1085

1102

Nala between Survey No. 1102

and1133

1133

1134

1135

1136

1137/1

1138

1139

1140

Canalbetween Survey No. 1140

and1142

1142

1143

1144

1145

1146

1197

1199

1200

Other District Road-67 between Survey No. 1200 and 1248

1248

1266

1267

1268

1269

414G1 /2005-23

1641

5 3

99 00

66 00

80 00

42 00

84 00

00 00

94 00

97 00

93 00

27 00

34 00

79 00

46 00

01 00

71 00

16 00

29 00

09 00

96 00

01 00

1.4

21 00

84 00

67 00

93 00

80 00

36 00

50 00

00 00

19 1642

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

2 1

1270

14) Kasari (Contd.... )

1271

1272

423

15) Talegaon Dhamdhere

435

437

438

440

443

444

445/1

446

449

452

454

455

456

457

458

461

459

460

463

472

475

477

476

479

483

484

Road atVillageBoundary [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 3

10 00

94 00

61 00

01 00

00 00

90 00

09 00

52 00

25 00

47 00

84 00

24 00

78 00

67 00

31 00

50 00

80 00

GovernmentLand between Road

and Survey No. 1804

1804

Canal in Survey No. 1804

1802

Road in Survey No. 1802

Nala in Survey No. 1802

1186

1184

1183

11 00

50 00

55 00

RoadbetweenSurvey No. 1183

and329

329

330

331

81 00

16 00

04 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30,1926

334

15) Talegaon Dhamdhere ( Contd.... )

335

336

337

338

339

342

343

344

345/1

346

347

348

353

358

359

360

361

362

363

364

Canalbetween Survey No. 364

and365

385

386

390

391

392

395

399

398

Government Land between Survey No. 398 and 417

417

418

421

422

1258

16) Shikrapur

1259

CartTrackbetween Survey No.

1259 and 1260

1260

1261

1190

Riverbetween Survey No. 1190

and1751

1643 3

17 00

33 00

95 00

99 00

38 00

05 00

68 00

85 00

13 00

42 00

67 00

95 00

90 00

56 00

09 00

16 00

03 00

21 00

16 00

20 1644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

1751 16) Shikrapur (Contd ....)

1274

1273

1283

1309

1308

1306

1784

1809

1810

1811

1812

Nala between Survey No. 1812

and 1303

1303

1304

1367

1366

1365

1374

1376

1377

1380

1381

1845

1384 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

5 3

75 00

19 00

23 00

54 00

61 00

31 00

52 00

53 00

48 00

71 00

16 00

49 00

33 00

Nala between Survey No. 1384

and1361

1361

StateHighway-55between Survey No. 1361 and 1572

1572

1574

1573

1584

1585

1586

1588

1591

1593

1592

1596

1595

1597/3

1597/2

StateHighway-55between Survey No.1597 and 1599

1599

38 00

23 00

73 00

55 00

14 00

40 00

24 00

56 00

89 00

24 00

33 00

56 00

80 00

96 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

2 1

CartTrackbetween Survey No. 16) Shikrapur (Contd .... )

1599 and 1902

1902

Nalabetween Survey No. 1902

and2130

2130

Nalabetween Survey No. 2130 and1650

1650

1651

1652

1455

Government Land between Survey. No.1455 and 1658

Govemment Land between Survey. No. 1455 and 1661

1658

1661

1662

1663

1666

1667

1668

1669

1670

1671

1672

1673

1674

1677

1678

1679

1680

1681

1284

1285

1742

1293

1294

StateHighway-55between Survey No. 1294 and 1313

1313

1312

1311

1310

22/1

17) Jategaon Khurd

1645 3

5 00

54 00

42 00

16 01

33 00

76 00

25 00

75 00

63 00

39 00

96 00

66 00

68 00

23 00

65 00

64 00

67 00

03 00

80 00

96 00

07 00

55 00

45 00

08 00

78 00

39 00

21 00

01 00 1646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

26 17) Jategaon Khurd (Contd.... )

32/3

32/1

32/2

Roadbetween Survey No. 32/2

and 34

47P

49/1

CartTrackbetween SurveyNo.

50and 51

60/1

60/3

68/2

68/1

92/1 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

12 00

59 00

21 00

42 00

85 00

31 00

11 00

84 00

16 00

49 00

82 00

67 00

14 00

35 00

75 00

16 00

20 00

87 00

89 00

27 00

26 00

98 00

31 00

72 00

89 00

58 00

04 00

יוי [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1647

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30, 1926

2 1

17) Jategaon Khurd (Contd....)

93/2

93/1

102

107

110/1A

110/2A

110/1B

110/2B

110/4

110/3

693

18) Karandi

88 00

87 00

18 00

24 00

02 00

09 00

50 00

Drainin Survey. No. 693

692

694

84 00

Roadbetween Survey No. 694

and 695

695

18 00

24 00

Canalbetween SurveyNo. 695

and691.

691

690

689

685

684

776

24 00

00 >

84 00

CartTrack in Survey No. 776

775

85 00

Village Road 53between Survey

No. 775 and 773

773

Canal in SurveyNo. 73

21 00

CartTrack in SurveyNo. 73

772

770

767

765/1/2

765/1/1A

766

909

910

911

912

04 00

25 00

34 00

71 00

66 00

94 00

48 1648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

2 18) Karandi ( Contd....)

Nala atVillage Boundary

915/1

19) Pimpale Jagtap

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

01.

21 00

62 00

NalabetweenSurvey No. 915/1

andNalia

Nala in Survey No. 915/1

902

901

900

899

898

897/1

897/2

StateHighway-55between Survey No. 897/2 and 884

884

885

890/1

11 00

98 00

24 00

66 00

54 00

94 00

84 00

Canalbetween Survey No. 890/1

and 890/2

890/2

882

881

Road atVillage Boundary

414

20) Wajewadi

Nala in Survey No. 418P

418P

64 00

61 00

43 00

17 00

Nalabetween Survey No. 418P

and415

415

416

421

411

422

27 00

18 00

59 00

25 00

Canal between Survey No. 411

and403

403

399

400

398

397

396

393

389

388

387

386

385

90 00

19 00

09 00

15 00

13 00

51 00

58 00

49 1649 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , ./माघ 30,1926

5 1

384

20)Wajewadi (Contd....)

383

381

380

377

376

375

374

373

372

369

368

364

383

361

357

358

Cart Trackbetween SurveyNo.

358and353

353

[F. No. L- 14014/48/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 17 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 564.- केन्द्रिय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इंडस्टीज लिमीटेड है, के गोवा के उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट (ऑफसोर ) में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य की संरचनाओं से महाराष्ट्र राज्य में, रायगड जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड व्दारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो ह अधिसूचना से उपाबध्द अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिं में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) व्दारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबध्द है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारतु के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस . डी. भिसे, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड पाइपलाइन परियोजना , टी/ 23, टेल्को रोड , गवळी माथा के पास, एमसीसीआई अॅण्ड ए के सामने, भोसरी, पुणे 411026 महाराष्ट्र राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

414 G1 / 2005-24 1650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

अनुसूची

जिल्हा: रायगड मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक : कर्जत

सर्वे नं / गट नं गाँव का नाम

2 1

158

1) मंडावणे

157

सर्वे नंबर 56 में कॅनाल

40/2

45/4

45/2

46/4

46/3

46/2

47/3

47/2

47/1

150

सर्वे नंबर 150 और 157 के बीच में

सरकारी जमीन

सर्वे नंवर 157 मे रास्ता

156

155

154

147

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

आर ओ यु अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रपुल

एर

हेक्टर

सिएर

25 00

63 00

65 00

97 00

89 00

25-

05 01

99 00

19 00

मर्वे नंबर 147 और गाव सीमा के बीच में

पेज नदी

निरंतर 3 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

2 1

गांव सीमा के पास की नदी 2) गौळवाडी

3) वंजारवाडी

4) भालिवाडी

सर्वे नंबर 48 में रास्ता

5) टाकवे

1651 3

23 00

28 00

68 00

85 00

49 00

42 00

73 00

88 00

70 00

02 00

75 00

00 00

58 00

97 00

51 00

91 00

81 00

32 00

27 00

97 00

सर्वे नंबर 65 और 66 के बीच मे रास्ता

6) कडाव

84बी/5

सर्वे नंबर 84ए में रस्ता

84ए

51 00

10 00

67 00

12 00

83 00

निरंतर 4 1652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

87ए

6) कडाव (निरंतर )

89ए

74ए

71/2

69ए

68ए

100ए

102

101

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

22 00

36 00

54 00

30 01

54 00

88 00

43 01

10 00

00 00

सर्वे नंबर 100/ए और 101 के बीच मे

राज्यमार्ग

109/बी

58 00

29 00

सर्वे नंबर 109 बी और 109ए के बीच

मे बराड गेज रेल्वे लाईन

109ए

108ए

118

119

128

129

127

126

26 00

51 00

10 00

45 00

23 00

81 00

49 00

सर्वे नंबर 126 और 10 के बीच मे रास्ता

7) गणेगाव चिंचोली

सर्वे नंबर 20 और 20 पी के बीच मे

गाडी रास्ता 00

30 00

10 00

50 00

75 00

14 00

सर्वे नंबर 20 और गाव सीमा के बीच मे

गाडी रास्ता [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1653

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

7) गणेगाव चिंचोली ( निरंतर )

8) सालवड

सर्वे नंबर 45 मे गाडी रास्ता

5/1 ह्य 2

सर्वे नंबर 70 और 6 मे रास्ता

5 00

27 00

55 00

99 00

36 00

11 00

67 00

28 00

13 00

97 01

30 00

40 00

03 00

80 00

सर्वे नंबर 17 और 15 के बीच मे उल्हास

नदी

9) नरसापुर

10)वाकस

92.

24 01

01 00

69 00

31 00

14 00

90 00

50 00

97 00

52 00

38 00

सर्वे नंबर 96 और 118 के बीच मे रास्ता

निरंतर 6 1654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

118

10) वाकस ( निरंतर )

117

112

113

114

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

57 00

63 00

20 00

सर्वे नंबर 114 और गाव सीमा के बीच मे

नाला

115

55 00

गाव सीमा और सर्वे नंबर 129 के बीच में

11) पिंपळोली बुद्रुक

नाला

129

111

110

112

109

108

105

104

103

101

सर्वे नंबर94मे रास्ता

12) तळवडे खुर्द

23 00

20 00

89 00

88 00

94 00

47 00

42 00

75 00

05 00

64 00

78 00

09 00

10 00

65 00

सर्वे नंबर 32 और 78 के बीच मे रास्ता

70 00

सर्वे नंबर 79 और गाव सीमा के बीच मे

सरकारी जमीन

13) वंजारपाडा

सर्वे नंबर 14 मे रास्ता

96 00

61 00

76 00

75 00

निरंतर 7 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

14) दहिवली

सर्वे नंबर 83 मे रास्ता

15) कोंडीक्ले

16) बिर्दीले

सर्वे नंबर 33 और 24 के बीच मे

राज्यमार्ग

सर्वे नंबर 22 और गाव सीमा के बीच मे

गाडी रास्ता

गाव सीमा और सर्वे नंबर 25 के बीच में 17) अवसरे

गाडी रास्ता

24/1

-25

1655 3

5 00

25 00

42 01

71 00

48 00

33 00

86 00

43 00

59 00

47 00

79 00

18 .00

90 00

43 00

15 00

06 00

19 00

77 00

42 00

39 00

25 00

37 00

59 00

46 00

45 00

निरंतर 8 1656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

17) अवसरे ( निरंतर )

18) मोहीली

गाव सीमा और सर्वे नंबर 11 के बीच में

रास्ता

19) निकोप

सर्वे नंबर 5 और गॉव सीमा के बीच मे

उल्हास नदी

गाव सीमा और सर्वे नंबर 41 के बीच में 20) खडयाचापाडा

उल्हास नदी

111

21) पाषाने

106

107

108

112

113

124

126

121

123

122

131

130

सर्वे नंबर 130 और 132 के बीच मे

सरकारी जमीन

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

5 00

10 00

77 00

59 00

58 00

06 00

20 00

29 00

41 00

.10

66 00

47 00

31 00

08 00

86 00

33 00

57 00

80 00

37 00

53 00

45 00

20 00

15 00

84 00

38 00

03 00

28 00

निरंतर 9 1657

./माष 30,1926

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

132

21) पाषाने ( निरंतर )

-69

134

154

153

152/1

158

151

सर्वे नंबर 151 और 150 के बीच मे

रास्ता

150

148

[फा. सं. एल-14014/49/2004- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th February, 2005

S. O. 564. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary : the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from the exploration blocks in the Northern/Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/s . Reliance Industries Limited , the promoter company of M/s. Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of Raigad District in the State of Maharashtra , a pipelineshould be laid by M/s . Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the said Act are made available to 1, e general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying t' pipeline under the land to Shri . S. D. Bhise, Competent Authority, M/s . Gas Transporation ad Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project , T/23 , Telco Road , Near Gaval Matha , Opp MCCI &A, Bhosari , Pune 411 026 , Maharashtra State,

414 G1 /2005-25 1658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA30, 1926

Schedule

District :Raigad.

Mandal /Thesil/Taluk: Karjat

Survey No./Gat No.

Village

2 1

158

1) Mandavane

157

Canal in SurvevyNo. 56

40/2

45/4

45/2

46/4

46/3

46/2

47/3

47/2

47/1

150

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] State: Maharashtra

Area to be acquired for Rou

Are C-Are Hectare

30 00

25 00

18 00

22 00

65 00

25 00

39 00

93 00

.54

10 00

53 00

25.

Government Land between

Survey No. 150 and 157

Road in Survey No. 157

156

155

154

147

26 01

25 00

97 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1639

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माथ 30,1926

2 1) Mandavane (Contd....)

00 15

Pej River between Survey

No. 147andVillage

Boundary

2) Goulwadi

07 82

River at Village Boundary

3) Vanjarwadi

4) Bhalivadi

00 69 23 00

58 00

00 47 49

42 00

73 00

70 00 17

67 00

45 75 00

00 00

85 00

Road in SurveyNo.48

5) Takve

Roadbetween SurveyNo.65, and66 57.

6)Kadav

88 00

97 00

36 00

84 00

97 00

81 00

32 00

17 00

27 00

97 00

51 00

67 00

42 00

06 1660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

84B/5

6) Kadav (Contd .... )

Road in Survey No. 84A

84A

87A

89A

74A

71/2

69A

68A

100A

102

101

StateHighway-38between Survey No. 100 /A and 101

109/B

Broad Gauge Railway Line between Survey No. 109B and 109A

109A

108A

118

119

128

129

127

126

RoadbetweenSurvey No.

126and10

7) Ganegaon Chinchavali

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)) 3

5 00

12 00

92 00

83 00

81 00

22 00

36 00

04 00

81 00

76 00

30 01

43 00

58 00

26 00

51 00

10 00

97 00

49 00

30 00

37 00

50 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1661

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30,1926

2 1

)14

7) Ganegaon Chinchavali (Contd....

5 00

18 00

CartTrackbetween Survey

No. 20 and 20P 00

CartTrackbetween Survey

No. 20 and VillageBoundary

8) Salvad

70 00

CartTrack in Survey No.45

5/1(2)

Road betweenSurveyNo.

70and 6

99 00

36 00

28 00

33 29

13 00

97 00

30 00

14 00

40 00

92 00

Ulhas River between Survey

No. 17 and 15

9) Narasapur

10) Vakas

24 00

01 00

69 00

51 00

01 01

90 00

50 1662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

2 1

10) Vakas ( Contd.... )

Roadbetween Survey No.

96and 118

118

117

112

113

114

Nala between Survey No. [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

97 00

52 00

60 00

38 00

64 00

85 00

57 00

20 00

114 and Village Boundary

115

11 ) Pimploli Budruk

Nala between Village Boundary and Survey No.

129

111

110

112

109

108

105

104

103

101

Roadin Survey No. 94

12) Talavade Khurd

10 00

55 00

20 00

88 00

94 00

42 00

75 00

80 00

05 00

49 00

78 00

09 00

10 00

24 65 00

59 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005 /माघ 30,1926

2 12) Talavade Khurd(Contd ....) Roadbetween Survey No.

32and 78

1663 3

5 00

41 01

Government Land between

SurveyNo. 79 and Village

Boundary

13) Vanjarpada

96 00

76 00

Road in Survey No. 14

14) Dahiwali

92 00

Road in Survey No. 83

15)Kondivale

16) Birdole

71 01

48 00

11 01

48 00

86 00

43 00

47 00

7.9 00

18 00

90 00

82 00

15 00

60 00

06 00

StateHighway-54between

Survey No. 33 and 24

19 00

72 00

77 00

CartTrackbetween Survey

No. 22 and Village Boundary

1664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

2 17) Avsare

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 3

5 00

CartTrackbetween Village

Boundary and Survey No. 25

24/1

18)Mohili

39 00

25 00

33 00

59 00

43 00

67 00

Roadbetween Village

Boundary and Survey No. 11

19) Nikop

77 00

29 00

58 00

06 00

20 00

29 00

41 00

10 00

66 00

47 00

08 00

Ulhas Riverbetween Survey

No. 5 and Village Boundary

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

1665 भारतं का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 5/माघ 30,1926

20) Khadyachapada

Ulhas Riverbetween Village Boundary and SurveyNo. 41

111

80 21) Pashane

106

107

.00

108

112

113

124

126

121

123

122

131

130

Government Land between Survey No. 130 and 132

132

134

154

153

152/1

158

151

Road between Survey No.

151 and 150

150

148

[ F. No. L-14014/49/2004-G.P.1

S. B MANDAL , Under Secy.

414 G1 /2005-26 1666

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.. 565-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार देना बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 421/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं० एल-12011 /118 /2001 - आई.आर. ( बी. II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवैर सचिव MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 565. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 421/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , Ahmedabad ( Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Dena Bank , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 27-1-2005.

[No. L- 12011 / 118/2001 - IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

SHRI B. I. KAZI , B. SC . , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 421/04

(Old ITC No. 86/2001 Transferred from I.T. Ahmedabad DenaBank, the Regional Manager , Dena Bank Ahmedabad Region Dena Laxmi Building , Ashram Road, Ahmedabad

...FirstParty

V/s .

TheGeneral Secretary, Dena Bank Employees . Union C/o. Dena Bank Anand Bhawan , 1st Floor, Opp . Krishna Cinema Relief Road , Ahmedabad

....Second Party

Shri Jashvant M. Patel ,

APPEARANCES : Firstparty :

Shri Anand S. Dakwala ( Absents) Second Party : Divyakant N. Shah ( Absent)

AWARD

1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by order No. L- 12011/ 118/2001 - IR ( B - 11) dated 10-10-2001 to this Tribunal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under :

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii)]

SCHEDULE

"Whether Dena Bank Employees Union , Ahmedabad is justified in demanding Regularization of Shri Motibhai Desai Sh . Kanjibhai Desai and Chauhan HitenKishorebhai Drivers engaged under the Bank's Scheme by executives to the management of Dena Bank ? If so , to what benefit these workmen are entitled?"

2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement ofclaim by this Tribunal on 6-12-01 . The date to file the statement of claim was 17-01-02 . The appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim with relevant documents and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within15 days of the receipt of the order .

3. However, proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party. The second party is failed to submit a statement of claim after3 years ofthe date of reference . Thus this tribunal has reason to believe that , the second party is not interested in the dispute . The second party has not proved that they are entitled for regularisation of Shri Motibhai Desai , Sh . Kanjibhai Desai and Chauhan Hiten Kishorebhai Drivers engaged under the bank Scheme by executive of the management of Dena Bank is and their demand is justified.Hence workmen are not entitled to any relief.

4. Looking to this fact it is clear that the workmen have not established that their demand is just and they are entitled for the regularizations. Hence these workmen are not entitled for regularisation .

Looking to the above observation I hereby pass the following order :

ORDER

The demand of the union for regularization of Shri Motibhai Desai , Shri Kanjibhai Desai and Shri Chauhan HitenKishore bhai Drivers engaged under the Bank Scheme by executive of the management of Dena Bank is not just and the workmen are not entitled to any benefit of regularization . The reference is hereby rejected. No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad

Date : 11-10-04

B.I.. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 566.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनाईटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 884/ 2004) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-12011/82/2001 - आई.आर. ( बी.- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव 1667

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 566. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. 884/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of United Bankof India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 27-01-2005

[No. L- 12011/82/2001 - IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

SHRI B. I. KAZI , B. SC. , L.L.M. , PresidingOfficer Industrial Dispute No. 884/04

United Bank of India,

(Old ITC No. 8/2002 Transferred from I.T. Ahmedabad) The Chief Regional Manager , UBI, Western Region , 5thFloor, United Bank Building, 25 , Sir P.M. Rd. , Mumbai-400001 ...First Party

V/s.

The Joint Secretary, United Bank of India Sramik Karmachari Samity, C/o .United Bank of India, Ahmedabad

...SecondParty APPEARANCES :

Absent

FirstParty :

Absent

SecondParty :

AWARD

1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Disputebetween the above parties by order No. L- 12011 / 82/2001 - IR (B - II) dated 13-08-2001 to this Tribunal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Chief Regional Manager , United Bank of India, Mumbai in denying overtime payment for 12-12-1998 (Saturday) to Shri K. J. Gohel, Cashier in charge , Bhavanagar Branch is legal and justified? Ifnot to them to what relief the concerned employee is entitled to?"

2. A notice was isued to the second party to file the statement of claim. However, by Ex. 3 the second party union has submitted a purshish regarding payment of over time to Shri K. J. Gohel . Looking to this fact the union does not persue this reference and for above reasons the Tribunal to disposed it accordingly. However, no award hasbeen passed till the date in the reference . Thus it was necessary for this Tribunal to pass the necessary orders looking to the facts ofEx. 3 .

3. This matter has been settled between the parties and there is not dispute to adjudicate. Hence I pass the following order:

ORDER

Thepartieshave settled the dispute as per Ex. 3 , Hence thisTribunal disposed off this reference accordingly. Ahmedabad

Date: 12-10-04

B.I. KAZI, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 567.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 306/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं० एल-12012/ 147/2004- आई.आर. (बी.- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव NewDelhi, the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 567. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 306/2004) oftheCentral Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27-01-2005.

[No. L- 12012/ 147/2004- IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT CHANDIGARH

Shri Rajesh Kumar, Presiding Officer Case No. L. D. 306/04

Sh . Ravi Kumar Kwatra S/o Sh. Chandi Ram C/oDeepak Khurana, Labour Law Advisor Chamber No. 57, Court Complex,

Abohar-Punjab.

...Applicant.

V/s.

TheJonal Manager,

UCOBank, Zonal Office, Chandigarh-160022.

...Respondent REPRESENTATIVES :

Fortheworkman : Inperson

Sh. Pardeep Aggarwal .

For the management :

AWARD

(Passed on 4-1-2005)

Exercising the powers conferred U/ S 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter refered to the Act), the Centreal Govt. vide No. L- 12012/ 147/2004 - IR (B.II) 1668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

dated 9th November 2004 has referred the following disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication.

"Whether the action of the Management of UCO Bank represented through Zonal Manager , UCO Bank, Chandigarh in disallowing/ terminating the agency in respect of Shri Ravi Kumar Kwatra, Agent ofthebank for collection of deposits for the Bank's Laghu Bachat Yojna on commission was just, fair and legal ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?

2. In the present case the workman has filed an application on 3-1-2005 for withdrawing his case as the case has been settled amicably with the management and prayed that his case be ordered to be withdrawn . the application has also been supported by an affidavit. In view of the application of the workman, the present reference is returned as withdrawn . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh

Date: 4-1-2005

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005 का.आ. 568.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडीकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण कोलम के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 36/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को27-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल-12011 /231/2002- आई.आर. ( बी.- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 568. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Gosternment hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 36/2003) of the Industrial Tribunal Kollam as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27-1-2005.

[No. L- 12011 /231 /2002- IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE IN THE COURT OF THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL KOLLAM (Dated, this the 10th day of January 2005) PRESENT:

SRI C. N. SASIDHARAN , Industrial Tribunal IN

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 36/2003

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] BETWEEN:

.....Management TheDeputyGeneral Manager, Syndicate Bank , Sasthakripa Office Complex, Sasthamangalam, Thiruvananthapuram.

(By Sri S. S. Kalkura, Advocate , Trivandrum)

AND

TheGeneral Secretary,

....Union Syndicate Bank Employees Union , Central Office, Ist floor, 16 Police Commissioner's Office Road,

Egmore, Chennai .

(By Sri . S. Ajith, Advocate , Trivandrum)

AWARD

The Government of India by order No. L. 12011/ 231/2002 - IR (B - II ) , dated 17-3-2003 , have referred this Industrial Dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

The issue for adjudication is the following:

"Whether the action of the management of Fort Branch of Syndicate Bank at Trivandrum in imposing the punishment compulsory retirement of Sri . M. S. Somasekhara Kurup AttenderAtt from service of the bankvide order No. 7866 /IR/ROT/CGS (W) 12/2001 Proc dated 24-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not what relief workman concerned is entitled to ?"

II . The management has imposed the punishment of compulsory retirement of the workman Sri . M. S. Somasekhara Kurup on the basis of a domestic enquiry in which the workman was found quilty of the misconduct chargesheeted against him. The validity of the emquiry was seriously disputed by the workman before this Tribunal . Hence that point was considered as a preliminary issue and by order dated 14-12-2004 this tribunal held that the enquiry is proper and valid. The relevant facts involved inthisdispute are stated in that order which I am extracting below in full:

ORDER

ThisIndustrial Dispute is the result of the punishment ofcompulsory retirement of Sri . M. S. Somasekhara Kurup, by the management of Syndicate Bank , by order dated 24-1-2002 .

2.The management has initiated disciplinary action against the workman for the misconduct of sexual harassment towards Smt . K. S. Geetha Devi , an employee of the Bank and for some misconducts of doing acts prejudicial to the interest of the Bank as per clause 19.5 (j ) oftheBipartite settlement . The amangement justifies their action on the plea that the workman was found guilty of the charges on a properly conducted domestic enquiry. Butaccording to the workman the enquiry was not properly conducted and the findings of the enquiry officer are perverse.Hence he is claiming reinstatement in service.

3. The case pleaded by the workman is briefly as under : The workman was working as Attender in the service ofthe management and has got 13 years of service. while working so he was placed under suspension alleging 1669 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

the commission of some misconducts which are baseless and vague . thereafter a chargesheet dated 16-8-2001 was issued alleging that he has committed the misconduct of sexual harassment towards Smt . K. S. Geetha Devi some previous incidents which are not relevant to the allegation have also narrated in the chargesheet . the allegations are false and ignoring his explanation the management ordered adomestic enquiry. The entire disciplinary action has been initiated in violation of the principles of natural justice. the Enquiry Officer has not given adequate opportunities to theworkman and the Enquiry Officer even refused to note down certain important questions put up to the witnesses by the workman . the findings of the enquiry Officer are perverse and without considering evidence properly .The specific charge alleged against the workman in that he obstructed Smt . Latha in performing her duties and since she did not yield to pressure , the workman got agitated and used filthy and obscene words against the cashier Smt . Geetha Devi . It is also stated that the service of the workman was not available while he was working in the cash department and therefore the same was carried out by cashier herself. The vagueness in the charge is clear . The Enquiry Officer has not considered the vagueness in the chargesheet . Smt. Geetha Devi was hostile towards the workman. The non availability of the workman is baseless allegation on the basis of the evidence in the enquiry. The Enquiry Officer has prepared a report only to help the management . There is no evidence in the enquiry that the workman approached or behaved against Smt. Geetha Devi in a sexually determined way. Even Smt . Geetha Devi has not deposed in that manner . The charge of sexual harassment cannot sustain and such an allegation is made to onlyharass and victimise the workman . The charge stated in the suspension order and the chargesheet are contrary. The senior manager has also stated that he has not received a compliant of sexual harassment from anyone . There is no evidence in the enquiry to prove the charge of sexual harassment . In the chargesheet some previous incidents which are unconnected with the allegations are also included and the Enquiry Officer found that the same has also been proved. The Enquiry officer is not a competent person to take a decision with regard to previous conducts ofthe workman. The Enquiry Officer has exceeded his jurisdiction . Though the workman submitted his commends after getting the enquiry report , the Disciplinary Authority without appreciating the submissions , decided to dismiss him from service. After personal hearing the proposed punishment was converted to compulsory retirement . The Appellate Authority also failed to appreciate the facts and confirmed the Purtishment. As per the findings of the Appellate Authority there is no element of sexual harassment in the case of the workman. But it was found that he has uttered some filthy and abusive words against the cashier . Even if the charges are proved , the punishment imposed is highly disproportionate and shocking . According to the workman he is remaining unemployed after his termination and is entitled to get reinstatement with all benefits .

working in the cash department prior to 1-8-2001 . But he was not co -operatiog with the cashier by not attending to work such as bundling , stitching etc. On 1-8-2001 the workman tried to obstruct the then Attendar Smt . B. Latha from her performing the above duties but she did not yield and continued her work, the workman then turned against the cashier Smt . K.S. Geetha Devi and uttered filthy, obscene and sexually coloured words causing her sexual harassment . On receipt of the complaint from the said cashier the workman was suspended . He was then chargesheeted explaining the offence committed by him and also explaining the previous punishment meted out to him. A detailed enquiry was conducted and he was found guilty of the charges . On finding him guilty of the charges and on assessment of previous misbehaviour, punishment ofdismissal was proposed. On his pleading for mercy he was awarded a punishment of compulsory retirement from service . This dispute is not maintainable as the issue has not been supported by a majority members of the union . As per the service conditions there is no need for the management to call for the explanation before placing an employee under suspension . After considering his explanation only, enquiry was ordered. In the enquiry the workman was represented by his defence representative and the workman was given all opportunity. The enquiry wasconducted fully in compliance with the principles of natural justice . The enquiry Officer has considered the explanation of the workman an evidence adduced before him and prepared his report . The management witnesses categorically stated the non availabilty of the workman on various occasions to discharge his duties . Despite the coercive tactics adopted by the delinquent , several witnesses straightaway comeforward and deposed against him. The Government of India's guidelines state that even sexually coloured remarks and unwelcome verbal conduct ofsexual nature are also in the nature of sexual harassment . The delinquent had caused open remarks against the private organs of a lady employee which the lady employee could not repeat orally since they are so vulgour. The employee has not disputed the previous disciplinary actions initiated against him and the punishment awarded for such misconducts . Hence the observation of the Enquiry Officer inthis regard was only correct and justifiable . The Enquiry Officer considered the evidence of witnesses in the enquiry properly and prepared his report . The findings are not perverse as alleged. The present punishment was awarded keeping in mind his past misconduct also . The punishment is not excessive as the workman was repeatedly indulged incommitting misconducts giving threats to the officer in his residence and even to the extent of giving threats and vulgour language against the lady colleague inside the branch . The management deuies all other allegations made by the workman against the management . The misconduct committed by him cannot be condoned and he cannot be reinstated as it would be rewarding a grave misconduct and as it would mock at the integrity and honesty of the vast majority of the employees who are honest diligent and law abiding .

4. The case pleaded by the management is briefly as under: The workman was working as Attendar in the Trivadrum Fort branch of the Bank since 22-1-2000 . He was

5. In view ofthe rival contentions with regard to the validity of the enquiry that point was considered as a preliminary issue. The enquiry file has been marked as Ext.

1670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

M1 with out examining the Enquiry Officer as agreed by the learned counsel for the workman.

6. The main point of attack against the action of management is that the charge alleged against the workman isvague and as such the charge is not sustainable. Further as the charge itself is unsustainable the enquiry report based on such charge is also not sustainable and vitiated. It is pointed out that the workman was placed under suspension as per order dated 8-8-2001 and in the suspension order the allegation is indecent and disorderly behaviour towards a lady clerk of the Bank . But subsequently chargesheet dated 16-8-2001 was issued to the workman alleging commission of grave misconduct of "doing acts prejudicial to the interest of the Bank " vide clause 19.5 (J) of the Bipartite Settlement .According to the learned counsel for the delinquent the charge is very much vague as it is not specified as to what are the acts "prejudicial to the interest of the Bank " . In support ofthis argument the attention of this Tribunal was brought to a decision of the High Court ofKerala in Gopalkrishna Prabhu V. Central Bank [ 1991 ( 1 ) KLT 383 ] . No doubt in the chargesheet it is alleged that the worker tried to obstruct Smt. B. Latha, Attendar, from attending her duties andwhen she did not yield to the demand of the workman he started abusing by using filthy and obscene words against the cashier Smt . Geetha Devi and that the act of the workman amounts to sexual harassment of Smt . Geetha Devi . However the misconduct is stated to be vide clause 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement . A reading of the charge of abusing Smt . Geetha Devi would indicate that it affect only private rights . Further it has come out in evidence in the enquiry that no customer was present in the bank at the time ofthe alleged incident . Therefore the charge cannot be stated tobe an act prejudicial to the interest of theBank.

7. The High Court in the aforementioned decision has considered the same question and found that such allegation itself cannot contitute misconduct . In that case the charges alleged the workman who is an employee in a Bank are allegedly receiving Rs . 100/- from a customer but not remitting in the Bank, for issuing cheques without drawing power, for not utilising housing loan etc. There also the employee was chargesheeted for doing acts prejudicial to the interest of the Bank under clause 19.5 (j ) ofthe Bipartite Settlement. The findings of the court in paras. 5 and 6 ofthe judgment are worth quoting as below :

" 5. A close scrutiny of the charges would indicate that matters highlighted thereunder affect onlyprivate rights. So far as charge No. (2) is concerned, it should be said , the transaction made mention of therein brings about only the relationship of a banker and customer. The other two charges , 3 and 4, to my mind, if found established do not constitute any misconduct, much less a misconduct defined in the clause captioned, " prejudicial to the interest of the bank." I have deliberately made this observation only to show that a finding on such matters can vary with the individuals and hence a delinquent is likely to be exposed to vagaries of subjective evaluation. It is not unlikely that some disciplinary authorities may

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] even opine that such acts will not constitute any misconduct at all although the conduct of the employee is such that it can be said that he failed to keep thehigh standards of moral, ethical or decorous behaviourbefitting an officer of the Bank. This by itselfmy view, cannot constitute misconduct unless the same falls within the enumerated items of misconduct other than the one coming under caption " any act prejudicial to the interest ofthe bank" .

6. " What in a given context would constitute 'conduct prejudicial to the interest of the bank' to be treated as 'misonduct ' would , to my mind , expose an area not amenable to objective evaluation . If thatbe the position such conduct cannot be treated as misconduct . Why it is said so is that a misconduct if proved would entail penal consequences . That is why it is always said that it is obligatory on the part ofthe employer to specify and if necessary define misconduct with precision and accuracy so that any expost facto interpretation of an incident may not be comoaflagedas misconduct. I an fortified in this view by two decisions of the Supreme Court : M/s . Glaxo Laboratories (P) Ltd. V. Presiding Officer Meerut (AIR 1984 SC505 ) and A. L. Kalra V. P & E Corporation ofIndia Ltd. (AIR 1984 S C 1361 ) " .

In the case before me also the workman was chargesheeted for the misconduct captioned ' prejudicial tothe interest ofthe Bank. ' Hence in the light of the above observations the allegations in the chargesheet cannot consitute miscoduct . Therefore the entire action of the management on the basis of such an allegation is vitiated and unsustainable and the enquiry findings are also unsustainable .

8. The next point of argument is that the allegation of sexual harassment against the workman and the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer are baseless and the charge itself is not sustainable. As stated above in the suspension order itisalleged that the worker has misbehaved in an indecent and disorderly manner towards a lady clerk . But in the chargesheet it was further alleged that the act of the workman amounts to sexual harassment . Enquiry Officer on the basis of the chargesheet reported that usage of abusive words and attacking the womanhood of a superior and a lady clerk has committed an act under (iia) of the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court on the subject ofsexual harassment of woman at work place as published inthe circular dated 11-3-98 (Ext . Mex 6 in the enquiry ). The Enquiry Officer has recorded that the delinquent had used sexually coloured abuse against Smt . Geetha Devi in a Vulgour language in the presence of other staff members and found that the workman is guilty of sexual harassment. Inthe chargesheet there is no allegation that the workman had acted in a sexually determined manner against Smt . Geetha Devi . In the absence of any such allegation, the findings of the Enquiry Officer is not sustainable. The Supreme Court in Vishaka V. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1997 SC3011 ) has defined sexual harassment while considering asimilar question. The court has pointed out that sexual harassment includes such unwelcome sexually determined 1671

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माष 30, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

behaviour(whether directly orby implication) as physical contactand advances , sexually coloured remarks etc. of course sexually coloured remarks also amounts to sexual harassment as held by the Apex Court but that should be committed inasexually determined manner and thevictim must be visited with adverse consequences if she does not consent to the conduct in question or raises any objection. The Supreme Court in apparal Export PromPromotion Council V. A. K. Chopra [ 1999 ( 1 ) LLJ962] also considered the questionofsexual harassment ofa female employee . Ir paras 24 and 25 of the judgment it was pointed out tha harassment is form of sexual discrimination projectea though unwelcome sexual advance , request for sexual favours and other verbal or physical conduct with sexual overtones whether directly ofby implication particularly when submission to or rejection of such conduct by female employee was capable of being used for affecting employment of female employee and unreasonably interferring with her work performance.

Inthe case onhand there is no such allegation at all.

evidencebefore the Enquiry Officer were relectant to repeat those obscene words as the words are very much bad which is evident from a reading ofthe obscene words stated inthe chargesheet. Further there is no concrete evidence inthe enquiry adduced by the delinquent to prove enemity of Smt. Geetha Devi towards him . So the allegation that Smt . Geetha Devi has filed a false complaint against the delinquent due to enemity is devoid of merit. Smt . Geetha Devi has deposed before the Enquiry Officer about the incident which is supported by the evidence of two other lady clerks ofthe Bank as MWs 4 and 5. It is also pertinent to note that the lady staff in the Bank has given a joint complaint to the Manager about the incident . The delinquent has no case that these lady clerks have any kind of enemityto him . The evidence of the complainant Smt. Geetha Devi supported by the evidence of other witnesses examined on the side of the management particularly MW4 and MW5 , fully establish that the delinquent abused Smt. Geetha Devi as alleged by the management in the chargesheet . However Enquiry Officer has found that the workman is guilty of the misconduct of sexual harasment which is clearly against the evidence on record in the enquiry. These circumstances also establish that the allegation of sexual harassment against the workman is baseless and the findings of the Enquiry Officer that the workman is guilty of the charge of sexual harassment is perverse .

Further the delinquent in the case is subordinate to the clerk and there is no chance for the lady clerk who is allegedly the victim to face adverse consequences on her objection to any of the acts of the delinquent. In the absence ofany allegation of sexually determined behaviour, unwelcome sexual advance , request for sexual favours etc. and in the light of the above observations of the Supreme Court, the present allegation that the delinquent has committed misconduct of sexual harassment and the findings of the Enquiry Officer to the effect are not sustainable . The enquiry is therefore vitiated on that ground also.

12. For the foregoing discussions , I hold that the entire action against the delinquent is vitiated and the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer based on the charge which isvague, is unsustainable. I accordingly quash the enquiry findings as it is vitiated and perverse.

III . The point now remains for consideration is regarding the punishment . In the aforementioned order, thisTribunal found that the entire action initiated against the workman by the management is vitiated and also that the charge, on the basis of which the enquiry has been conducted, is also unsustainable . As the charge itself is vitiated and unsustainable , the question of granting opportunity to the management for adducing fresh evidence also does not arise. As the management failed to establish the charges levelled against the workman he is necessarily to be reinstated in service with all benefits .

9. The next point urged by the learned counsel for the delinquent is that the findings of the Enquiry Officer thattheworkman is guilty of sexual harassment is perverse. Asheld byme above the allegation of sexual harassment is unsustainable . Further none ofthe wirnesses examined on the side of the management in the enquiry has stated that the delinquent has sexually harassed Smt . Geetha Devi . Thewitnesses only stated that the delinquent used abusive andwords invulgour language. There is also no evidence to show that there was any talk between the delinquent and Smt . Geetha Devi . In the absence of any evidence in the enquiry in support of sexual harassment, the Enquiry Officer foundthat the workman has sexually harassed the complainant Smt. Geetha Devi. Hence the findings to this extend is defenitely perverse.

IV. In view of what is stated above , an award is passed holding that the action of management in imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement of the workman Sri. M. R. Somasekhara Kurup is unjustified and illegal and accordingly directing the management to reinstate him in service with all attendant benefits including continuity of service.

C. N. SASIDHARAN , Industrial Tribunal

APPENDIX

Documentmarked on the side of the Management.

Ext. M1 . Series :Enquiry file containing , suspension order, chargesheet , Enquiry pro- ceedings , depositions of witnesses , Enquiry report etc.

10. Now the question is whether the workman is guilty of the misconduct of abusing by using filthy and obscene words against Smt . Geetha Devi , according to the Learned Counsel for the delinquent Smt . Geetha Devi is in enemical terms with the worker and because of that Smt . Geethe Devi has preferred a false complaint against the delinquent . At the outset I may state that it is quitequ unbelievable that a lady clerk working in a Nationalised Bank has filed a false complaint alleging that the delinquent used abusive and obscene words in a vulgour language as stated in the chargesheet . It is noticeable that the two lady clerksworking in the same branch ofthe Bank while giving 1672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

The petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler in the respondent company on 17-3-1976. Later, he was promoted asGeneral Mazdoor w.e.f. 1-11-79 . While the petitionerwas working in RK-7 Incline , on 2-5-98 he was unjustly placed under suspension.

The following charges were framed against him:-

का.आ. 569.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मचारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण, गोदावरीखानी ( सदंर्भ संख्या 74/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

25. 12 :-Refusal , to accept any charge - sheet or order or noticecommunicated inwriting .

[सं० एल-22013/1/2005- आई आर ( सी- II) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

25.19 :-Assault , attemptto assault, threatening to assault, abuse, a co -worker or subordinate or superior while on duty or otherwise in connection with employment.

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 569. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 74/2002) ofthe Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Godavarikhani as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005 .

[No. L-22013/ 1 /2005- IR ( C- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR-COURT, GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT :

SMT. K. SUVARCHALA, M.A. B.L. , Chairman- cum-PresidingOfficer

Thursday, the 30th day of December, 2004

Industrial Dispute No. 74 of 2002

BETWEEN :

The petitioner submitted his explanation on 14-5-98. He did not assault Sri P. V. Satyanarayana , Officiating CollieryManager and never tried to beat him with a chair, as alleged . As the Man - Way Clerk did not book his attendance on 2-5-98 stating that suspension order was issued, he asked about it with the Acting Manager. The respondent company conducted a farse domestic enquiry and dismissed him from service , by order dt . 22-9-98 .He did not refuse to receive the suspension order. There is no cogent evidence to prove the charges levelled against him. The domestic enquiry was not conducted properly. Opportunity was not given to him to defend himself. Copy ofthe enquiry report was not supplied to him. The petitioner is illiterate . But the entire proceedings were recorded in English. Thump impression ofthe petitioner was obtained without explaining the contents in Telugu . The findings of the enquiry officer are biased and perverse. The petitioner had more than 22 years clean service . The capital punishment of dismissal is highly arbitrary and illegal . It is shockingly disproportionate to the gravity of charges. Hence, he filed the petition to set - aside the dismissal order dt. 22-9-98 and to direct the respondent to reinstate him into service with continuity of service and all other consequential attendant benefits including full back -wages .

Petitioner

Chippakurthi Rajam , S/ o Lingaiah, Age49 yrs. , Ex-General Mazdoor, R/o . D-219, RK-8 Colony, Srirampur, Dist. Adilabad (A.P. )

AND

TheGeneral Manager,

3. To this the respondent had filed the counter denying the averments ofthe petition. While the petitioner was working at RK-7 Incline , he was issued charge-sheet dt. 2-5-98 for acts of misconduct under company's Standing OrderNo. 25.12 and 25.19 . On 2-5-98, the petitioner went to the Man - Way office and when the Man - Way Clerk handover suspension order he tore-off the letter and left the Man-Way..

Singarani Collieries Co. Ltd. , Srirampur, Dist. Adilabad, A.P.

Respondent

This petition coming before me for final hearing in the presence of the petitioner and the counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondent called absent and having stood over for consideration till this data, the court passed the following :-

AWARD

1. The Government of India in exercise of powers conferred U/s . 2 -A and 10(1 ) (d) of I.D. Act, 1947 referred thedispute for adjudication to this Tribunal.

The petitioner filed the claim statement .

Thus refused to receive the suspension order communicated in writing . Thereafter the petitioner went into the Colliery Manager's room at about 7-45 AM , and assaulted Sri P. V. Satyanarayana, Officiating Colliery Manager'sroomat about 7-45 AM, and assualted Sri P: V. Satyanarayana, Officiating Colliery Manager, causing him bleeding injury. The petitioner also tried to hit him with a chair. He was prevented by the office Peon from causing further injuries to the Officiating Colliery Manager . The petitioner submitted explanation dated 14-5-98 to the charge sheet issued to him , denying the charges levelled against him. Domestic enquiry was conducted. The petitioner alongwith one Podari Sathaiah , Coal Cutter attended the enquiry and fully participated in the enquiry. During the 2. The averments of the petition are as follows :

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1673 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/ माघ 30 , 1926

clearly stated that when he tried to stop the petitioner in tearing the letter, the petitioner abused him in filthy language.

While cross -examining the witness , the petitioner questioned that the witness told him that if he had taken the letter, then only he will register his muster. To that, the witness stated that he asked the petitioner to take the letter. He also told him that copy of the letter was affixed in the notice board.

enquiry, he was given an opportunity to cross-examine all the management witnesses and also was given a chance to produce his witnesses and documents, if any. However, he failedto produce witnesses and documents in his defence. The enquiry was conducted in accordance with the principles of natural justice . The enquiry proceedings recorded in English were explained to the petitioner in Telugu, from time to time by the enquiry officer. The charges were proved in the enquiry . The petitioner was issued a copyof enquiry report , giving an opportunity to make any representation, if so desired, against the findings ofenquiry officer. But he did not submit any representation against the findings of the enquiry officer. The charges proved against the petitioner constitutes serious offence . Hence, the respondent awarded the appropriate punishment dismissing the petitioner from service . The action takenby the respondent is as per the rules . Hence , the petition may bedismissed.

4. On behalf of the petitioner, no oral or documentary evidence adduced .

Onbehalfofthe respondent, Ex. M - 1 to Ex . M -7 are marked.

8. Sri P.V. Satyanarayana, Safety Officer has given his statement . In that he stated that on 2-5-98 , when he was officiatingCollieries Manager for Manager's room, he saw one Alli Gattaiah , General Mazdoor standing in front of the Manager's room . At about 7-40 hours suddenly the petitioner entered his room, opened the doors and stood aside . He asked him to come to the distribution place .He repliedthat hewill come later. Suddenly, the petitioner kicked him with wrist on the left side of his mouth, which caused bleeding injury. The water glass was broken. The petitioner also tried tohithim with a chair. Then he get down from his chair. Meanwhile, Alli Gattaiah, office boy stopped the petitioner and caught the chair. The petitioner left the room.

5. Heard the petitioner.

The petitioner refused to cross -examine t' witness .

6. The Central Government referred the matter to this court to adjudicate the dispute :-

"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s . Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , Srirampur (Projects) Area, Srirampur in dismissing the services of Sri Chapakurthy Rajam, General Mazdoor, RD -8 Incline of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , is justified or not ? If not , to what relief the applicant is entitled for? "

9. The Alli Gattaiah was also examined biore the enquiry officer . He deposed that on 2-5-98 he was c . duty asOffice-Boy, in,in the Manager's room . Around 9-00 cock, he heard a noise from the Manager's room . Immediately he rushed to the Manager's room and found the petitioner who caught hold of a chair. He also observed bleeding from theManager's mouth and found that the water glass was broken into pieces , on the floor . After seeing him, the petitioner placed the chair on the floor.

Thepetitioner cross -examined the witness and asked whether he had seen him while entering into the room . The witness replied that he entered into the Manager's room, afterhearing the noise and saw the petitioner holding the chair.

10. The evidence of Sri P. V. Satyanarayana , was supported by the evidence of Sri Alli Gattaiah, Office- Boy, who had witnessed the incident .

The petitioner was working in the respondent companyas General Mazdoor at RK- 7 Incline. The charges framed against the petitioner are for his acts of misconduct. under Company'sStanding Order No. 25.12 & 25.19, alleging that on 2-5-98 at the time of commencement of 1st shift, the petitionerwent to the man- way office and when theMan- Way Clerk handover the suspension order, the petitioner tore-off the letter and left the man-way. He refused to receive the suspension order communicated in writing. Thereafter, the petitioner went into the Collieries Manager's room at about 7-45 A.M. , and assaulted Sri P.V. Satyanarayana, officiating Collieries Manager, causing him bleeding injury.

11. The next point agitated by the petitioner before the court is that to declare the domestic enquiry as invalid stating that sufficient opportunity was no given to him to cross -examine the witnesses.

7. Now the petitioner is agitating before the court that he did not tear the suspension order, as it was not issued to him :

Afterperusal of the reccrd, it is quite clear that at each and every stage , the enquny officer had explained the proceedings in Telugu and also taken the thumb impression of the petitioner, at every stage . He had given his thumb impression , without raising any objection. But now he is agitating that he was not given opportunity to defend himself. He had cross -examined all the witnesses .

Inthe domestic enquiry, one T.V. Krishna Rao, Clerk was examined as MW - 1 . He is the person who gave report to the higher authorities about the behaviour of the petitioner on 2-5-98 . In his enquiry statement, the witness stated that he was on the duty of maintaining the work of booking musters ofthe workers . At 7-00 a.m. , the petitioner went to the man -way and asked him to book his muster. He toldhim that he had a letter of suspending him upto 2-9-98 . The petitioner took the letter and tore it. The witness was examined as MW- 1 by the enquiry officer. In that he

12. The behaviour of the petitioner is that when the suspension letter was served on him , he had tore it off and directlywenttothe Manager's room , kicked the officiating Manager Sri . P. V. Satyanarayana on his mouth and tried to 414 GI/ 2005-27 1674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

beat him with a chair. The petitioner has an indecent behaviour. If it is not curbed, it leads to introducing revolutionary methods in a work place, spoiling the atmosphere and encouraging the other workers to get the benefits without working.

The behaviour of the petitioner is a barbaric action, forwhich all covilised community can bow down its head. The charges against the petitioner were proved beyond any reasonable doubt. Therefore , the action taken by the respondent is justified and there appears to be no reason to interefere with the decision of the respondent's company.

In the result, the petition is dismissed. The reference is answered accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs .

Typed to my dictation , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this , the 30th day of December, 2004.

SMT . K. SUVARCHALA, Chairman -cum- PresidingOfficer

L. D. No. 74/2002

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

For Workman :-

-Nil-

ForManagement :-

-Nil-

Exhibits

For Workman :-

-Nil-

ForManagement :-

Ex. M- 1 Dt. 2-5-1998 Charge- Sheet

Ex. M-2 Dt. 14-5-1998 Reply to Charge- Sheet Ex. M-3 Dt. -do- Enquiry proceedings alongwith concerned documents .

Ex .M-4 Dt. 7-7-1998 Enquiry Report .

Ex. M-5 Dt . 10-7-1998 2nd Show -cause notice .

Ex. M-6 Dt . 24-7-1998 Ack . , to 2nd show -cause notice .

Ex. M-7 Dt. 22-9-1998 Dismissal order.

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 570.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एन.सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवादमें केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर ( सदंर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./एल.सी./आर. /20/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-22012/395/91 - आई आर ( सी- II) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005 S.O. 570.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/20 / 92 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of NCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005 .

[No. L- 22012/395/ 91 - IR(C- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR- COURT, JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT/LC /R/20/92

SHRI C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer The President,

Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Panchayat (HMS ) ,

Gerab Mine , G. T. Road,

..Applicant Asansol (West Bengal ) .

Versus

The President,

The General Mnanager , Dudhichua Project ofH.C.L. , PODudhichua Colliery,

....Non -applicant Distt. Sidhi (MP).

AWARD

Passed on this 19th day of January, 2005 1. TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour vide order No. L- 22012//395 /91 - IR(CII) dated 16-1-92 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the General Manager , Dudhichua Project of NCL , PO Dudhichua Colliery, Distt. Sidhi (MP) in terminating the services of Shri Dau Ram, Tripman , Dudhichua w.e.f. 22-2-1991 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled to?"

2. The case was at the stage of hearing argument on priliminary issue as to whether the departmental enquiry conducted by the Management is legal and proper . The order sheet of the case reveals that since 9-5-2003 , the date fixed in the case for argument , the workman absented himself. In spite of issuing notice to him, he failed to appear on the subsequent dates fixed i.e.11-7-2003 , 21-10-03 , 23-2-2004, 28-5-2004 , 11-8-2004, 2-11-2004, 22-11-2004 , 6-12-2004 and 17-1-2005 .

3. The order sheet dated 28-5-2004 indicates that on the same date, Shri A. K. Shashi , Advocate counsel for the management filed a settlement deed. While persued the record , the above settlement deed was not found original butitwas copy of the original . On 17-1-2005, the date fixed inthe case, the management filed original settlement deed.

1675 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/ माघ 30 , 1926

The terms and conditions of the original settlement deed are asfollows :-

(सदंर्भ संख्या 253/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-22012/186/2002- आई आर ( सी एम- II) ]

एन. पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी " 1. Shri Dau Ram will be reappointed afresh as Tripmanin clerical Grade III on the initial pay of Pay scale ofRs. 3545-87-5111 / - (NCWA -VI) subject to this fitness in medical examination by the company's Doctor.

New Delhi, the 28th January, 2005 2. Shri Dau Ram will be posted in any of the Project/ Unit based on requirement other than Dudhichua Project.

3. Shri Dau Ram will not raise any type of dispute including for payment of salary/ wages for the period from the date of his termination i.e. from 22-2-91 upto reappointment.

S.O. 571. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 253/2004) ofthe Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal -Cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the management ofFood Corporation of India, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005.

4. The conduct and performance of Shri Dau Ram will be watched closely and in case found otherwise, his services would be terminated without any further notice.

[No. L- 22012/186/2002 -IR(CM - II) ]

N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

5. This is in full and final settlement of this case and in future neither, the NCL management will entertain any further claim in this regard nor Shri Dau Ram will raise any claim inhis case either directly or through any trade Union.

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT -1, CHANDIGARH

Case No. LD . 253/2004

6. The NCL Management and Shri Dau Ram agreed that the copy of this settlement will be filed before the learned CGIT Jabalpur for passing No dispute Award in the matter of reference No. CGIT/LC/R/ 20/92. "

The Organising Secretary,

FCI Workers Union ,

The workman failed to verify the settlement deed and to prosecute the case further.

16-Ashok Road , New Delhi - 110001 .

... Applicant

Versus

Respondent

The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Rothak (Haryana) .

REPRESENTATIVE :

4. It has come in the order sheet dated 22-11-2004 that Shri A.L. Verma, Sr. Law Officer for the management submitted that as per terms of settlement , the workman is now in the service of the management. There is an affidavit onrecord of Shri A.L. Verma, Sr. Law Officer ( IR) , NCL , Singrauli where in it is stated on oath that as per terms of settlement, the workman has been provided employment and is at present working as Tripman , Clerk Grade III at Nigahi Project ofNCL .

Forthe workman : Shri Lekh Ram

For the management : Shri N. K. Zakhmi .

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

This affidavit ofShri A.L. Verma remained unrebutted onrecord. Under the facts and circumstances of the case, it is indicated that since the workman has been given employment and is presently working in the service ofthe management therefore he has lost interest in prosecuting this reference and for the above reason, he failedto prosecute the reference .

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide notitication No. L- 22012/ 186/2002/ IR(CM - II) dated 28th June, 2004 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

5. It appears from the above that the workman has no interest in the case presently and he does not want to press the claim. No Dispute Award is therefore passed with no order as to cost.

6. The copy of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules.

"Whether action of the management of FCI in making recovery ofRs . 11810 from gang workman ofJind for loading work of special rakes at saffidon without paying them travelling allowance or even transport facility to move outstation is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief they are entitled to?" C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

1. On the request of both the parties case taken up inLok Adalat for settlement/ disposal . Statement of A/R of workman recorded on SA. The representative of the workman made a statement to withdraw the present reference in the Lok Adalat as the case has been settled . In view of the statement of the rep. of the workman and management having no objection the reference is returned का.आ. 571.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एफ.सी. आई. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिकं अधिकरण नम्बर-1 , चण्डीगढ़ 1676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] to Central Government as withdrawn. Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record .

Mechanist w.e.f. 28-2-1999 isjustified ? and legal ? If not, to what relief he is entitled to ?"

Announced .

16-12-2004

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

Announced.

का.आ. 572.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , बी.बी.एम.बी. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर -1 , चण्डीगढ़ ( सदंर्भ संख्या 20/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28/01/2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

16-12-2004

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer [सं० एल-23012/ 6/2002- आई आर ( सी एम- II) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

का.आ. 573.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का-14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी.बी.एम.बी. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर -1 , चण्डीगढ़ ( सदंर्भ संख्या 21/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं० एल-23012/2/2002- आई आर ( सीएम- II) ] S.O. 572. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 20/2003 ) ofthe Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal-Cum -Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of BBMB, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005.

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी [No. L-23012/6/2002- IR( CM- II) ]

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005 N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- I, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 20/2003

S.O. 573. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 21/2003 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - Cum-Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of BBMB , and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005 .

Sh . Kuldeep Singh C/ o,

[No. L-23012/2/2002 - IR( CM -II)] Sh . R. K. Singh Parmar,, 211 -L, Brari , P.O. Pratap Nagar ,

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

Applicant

Nangal Dam, Distt, Roper.

Versus

ANNEXURE

The ChiefEngineer (Power Wing)

Generation , B.B.MB. ,

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT-I, CHANDIGARH Nangal Township , Distt . Roper.

Respondent

REPRESENTATIVE :

Case No. I.D. 21/2003

Forthe workman : Shri R. K. Singh

For the management: Shri Rajinder Singh

The Rajinder Pal C/o R. K. Singh Parmar, 211 -L, Brari , P.O. Pratap Nagar , Nangal Dam, Distt. Roper (Pb) .

AWARD

Applicant Passed on 16-12-2004

Versus

The Chief Engineer (Power Wing) Generation, BBMB

Nangal Township, Distt . Roper (Pb ) . Respondent The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L- 23012 /6/ 2002 / IR ( CM - II ) Dated 27th January, 2003. Has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Representative:

For the workman : Shri R. K. Singh

"Whether the action of the management of BBMB , Nangal Township, Roper in terminating the services ofSh . Kuldeep Singh S/o . SH . Garib Singh , For the management : Shri Rajinder Singh [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1677

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30, 1926

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L - 23012 /2 / 2002/ IR( CM - II) Dated 27th January, 2003. Has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of BBMB , Nangal Township , Ropar in terminating the services of Sh . Rajinder Pal S/ o. Sh. Bakshish Singh , Rigger , w.e.f. 6-7-2000 is legal and justified? If not, to what reliefhe is entitled to?"

Announced.

16-12-2004

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 574.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर-1 , चण्डीगढ़ ( सदंर्भ संख्या 141/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28/01/2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल -23012/39/97- आई आर ( सीएम- II) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 28th January, 2005 S.O. 574. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 141/98) ofthe Central Govt . Indus. Tribunal -Cum- Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of BBMB and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005.

[No. L-23012/39/97 - IR(CM-II)] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT-I, CHANDIGARH Case No. L.D. 141/98

Applicant Sh.Harinder Singh C/o R. K. Singh Parmar , Qtr . No. 35-G, Nangal Township, Distt, Ropar (Pb .) .

Versus

Respondent The Executive Engineer, Pandoh Dam Divison, B.B.M.B. Pandoh (H.P. ) .

REPRESENTATIVE:

For the workman : Shri R. K. Singh

Smt . Jyoti Kaushal

Forthemanagement:

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L-23012/39/ 97 /IR( CM - II) Dated 22nd July, 1998. Has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of BBMB, represented through the Chief Engineer, Trans-mission (PW) Chandigarh, and the Executive Engineer, O&M Division BBMB(PW) , Dhulkot, Distt. Ambala (Haryana) interminating the services of Sh. Harinder Singh w.e.f. 25-7-85 is justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled and from what date ? "

Announced . 16-12-2004

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

का.आ. 575.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी.बी.एम.बी. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर-1 , चण्डीगढ़ ( सदंर्भ संख्या 182/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28/01/2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं०एल -23012/38/1997-आई आर ( सीएम- II) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 28th January, 2005 S.O. 575.- 1n pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 182/98) ofthe Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal -Cum-Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of BBMB and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005.

[No. L - 23012/38/ 1997- IR( CM- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer 1678

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

New Delhi , the 28th January , 2005

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- L, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 182/98

Sh . Jai Singh S/o Sh . Arjan Singh

S.O. 576. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 183/98 ) ofthe Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal -Cum - Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of BBMB, and their workman, received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005 .

C/o Qtr . No. 35/G, Nangal Township ,

Distt, Ropar. (Pb. )

Applicant

[No. L- 23012/37/97 - IR( CM- II)] Versus

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

The Executive Engineer , Pandoh Dam Divison, B.B.M.B. Pandoh (H.P. )

.. Respondent

Representative:

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- I, CHANDIGARH For the workman : Shri R. K. Singh

Case No. I.D. 183/98

Forthe management : Shri Jyoti Kaushal

AWARD

TheBaljit Singh ,

Passed on 16-12-2004

Qtr. No. 25/G, Nangal Township , Distt, Roper. (Pb.)

Applicant

Versus

The Central Government Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L -23012/38/ 97/ IR ( CM - II ) Dated 19th August , 1998. Has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

TheExecutive Engineer, operation & Mtc . Division B.B.M.B.(PW) ,

Dhulkote, Distt . Ambala . Respondent

REPRESENTATIVE :

For the workman : Shri R. K. Singh

Forthe management: Snıt. Jyoti Kaushal

"Whether the action of the management of BBMB , represented through the Chief Engineer , Transmission(PW) Chandigarh and the Executive Engineer, O& M Division, B.B.M.B. (PW) , Dhulkote, Distt. Ambala (Haryana) in terminating the services of Sh. Jai Singh w.e.f. 25-7-85 isjustified ? If not, to what releif is the workman entitled and from which date ?"

AWARD Passed on 16-12-2004

The Central Govt . Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L -23012/ 37 /97/ IR ( CM - II ) Dated 19th August, 1998. Has rererred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

Announced. 16-12-2004

"Whether the action of the management ofBBMB , represented through the Chief Engineer , Transmission (PW) Chandigarh and the Executive Engineer , O &M Division BBMB (PW) , Dhulkote , Distt. Ambala (Haryana) in terminating the services of Sh. Baljit Singh S/o Sh. Bachan Singh w.e.f. 25-7-85 is justified? If not, to what releif is the workman is entitled and from which date ? "

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 576.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी. बी.एम.बी. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर-1 , चण्डीगढ़ ( सदंर्भ संख्या 183/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28/01/2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Announced.

16-12-2004

[सं० एल-23012/37/97 - आई आर ( सीएम-11) ]

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer एन. पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1679

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

का.आ. 577.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , बी. बी. एम. बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरंकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर -1 , चण्डीगढ़ ( संदर्भ संख्या 155/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-23012/63/1998 - आई.आर. (सी.एम.- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 577. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 155/99 ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of BBMB and theirworkmen, received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005.

[No. L -23012/63/ 1998- IR ( CM- II)] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH

CaseNo. I.D. 155/99

Sh. Shyam Singh

C/oDhani Ram,

S-2/773 , Sundernagar Colony, Distt. Mandi (H.P.) , Sundernagar .

: Applicant Versus

1. The ChiefEngineer, Bhakra Beas ManagementBoard , BSL Project, Sundernagar (H.P. ) , Sundernagar

: Respondent 2. TheExecutive Engineer, Pandoh Dam Division , B.B.M.B. , Pandoh (H.P. ) , Sundernagar.

Representative:

: Shri Dhani Ram Fortheworkman

: Shri D.L. Sharma For the management

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

The Central Govt . Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L -23012/63 /98/IR (CM- II) Dated 7th July, 1999

Hasreferred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the Chief Engineer , Bhakra Beas Management Board, Beas Sutlej Link Project, Sundernagar Distt . Mandi (HP) and Executive Engineer , Bhakra Beas Management Board, Pandoh Dam Divn . , Pandoh , Distt . Mandi in denying the workman Sh . Shyam Singh S/o Sh . Kali Ram on 17-11-97 to take him back in employment even after his acquital by the Court is just and legal? If not, to what relief the workmen is entitled?"

Announced. Date: 16-12-2004

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 578.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी. बी. एम. बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर -1 , चण्डीगढ़ ( संदर्भ संख्या 98/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-23012/24/2001- आई.आर. ( सी. एम.-II )] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 578. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 98/2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of BBMB and their workmen, received by the Central Government on28-01-2005.

[No. L -23012/24/2001 -IR(CM- II) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT - L, CHANDIGARH

CaseNo. I.D. 98/2002

Sh . Balbir Chand

: Applicant S/o Sh. Ram Krishan , C/o Sh. Dhani Ram, General Secretary, BSL Project Mazdoor Ekta Union, S-02, Sundernagar Distt. Mandi (H.P. ) , Versus

1. The ChiefEngineer, BSLProject, BBMB, Sundernagar, Mandi (H.P.), 1680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

2. The Executive Engineer,

B.B.M.B. Township Division, Sundernagar, Mandi (H.P. ) .

Respondent Representative:

Forthe workman

: Shri Dhani Ram

: Shri D.L. Sharma Forthe management

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT- L, CHANDIGARH

Case No. L.D. 39/2003

Parties

Sh . Kuldip Singh

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

The Central Govt . Ministry of Labour vide notificationNo. L -23012/24/2001 /IR( CM -II) dated6th May, 2002has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the Management of BBMB , Township Division, Sundernagar, Distt. Mandi (HP) in terminating of services of Sh. Balbir Chand S/o Ram Krishan w.e.f. 1-12-98 without any notice is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman isentitled?"

C/ o Sh. R.K. Singh Parmar, 211-L,Brari,

P.O. Partap Nagar,

Nangal Dam,

Applicant Ropar

Versus

The ChiefEngineer,

: Respondent BhakraDam, B.B.M.B. , Nangal Township , Distt . Ropar(Punjab)

Representative:

Forthe workman

Announced.

Date: 16-12-2004

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 579.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी. बी. एम. बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर-1 , चण्डीगढ़ ( संदर्भ संख्या 39/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-23012/1 /2002- आई.आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी

: Shri R.K. Singh

: Shri R.C. Attri Forthe management

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

The Central Govt. Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L- 23012/ 1 /2002 /IR (CM - II ) dated 17th February, 2003 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Management ofBBMB , Nangal Township , Ropar in terminating the services of Sh . Kuldip Singh S/o Sh . Gurcharan Singh , Rigger w.e.f. 6-7-2000 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief he is entitled to? "

Announced .

Dated: 16-12-2004

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 579. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 39/2003) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of BBMB and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005

[No. L -23012/ 1/2002- IR(CM -II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 580- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी. बी. एम. बी. के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नम्बर-1 , चण्डीगढ़ ( संदर्भ संख्या 8/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल-23012/08/96- आई.आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1681

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 05/माष 30, 1926

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 580. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 5/1998) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of BBMB and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 28-1-2005

[No. L-23012/8/96- IR(CM- II)] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT- L, CHANDIGARH

Case No. L.D. 5/98

PARTIES

Sh. R.K. Singh Parmar,

Secretary, Punjab INTUC, Qtr. No. 35-G,

Nangal Township , Distt. Ropar- 140124.

Applicant Versus

The ChiefEngineer (Generation), BBMB,

Nangal Township , Distt.Ropar(Punjab)-140124.

Respondent Representative:

Forthe workman

: Shri R.K. Singh

: Shri Rajinder Singh Forthe management

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

The Central Government Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L - 23012/8/96 - IR( CM - II ) dated 30th December, 1997 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the absence from service of Sh, Gurnaib Singh more than 10 days is an abandonment and ten days notice is required to be served upon the workman? Ifyes, to what relief the workmen is entitled to and from which date? "

Announced . Dated: 16-12-2004

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer 414 Gl/2005-28

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 581.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947(1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 55/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-22012/420/2003- आई.आर. (सी.एम.- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 581.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 55/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of ECL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 28-1-2005

[No. L- 22012/420/2003 - IR (CM- II)] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE,

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSCI PRESENT: SriMd. Sarfaraz Khan, Presiding Officer Reference No. 55 of 2004

PARTIES: TheAgent, New Kenda Colliery, Kenda Area ofM/ s . ECL , P.O. Kenda, Distt . Burdwan, (WestBengal) Management

Vs.

Workman Sri Angirananda S/o . Late Faujdar Harijan, Pit Clerk represented by KoyalaMazdoor Congress , Asansol.

Representatives:

: Sri P. K. Das Advocate .

Forthe Management FortheWorkman : (Union)

Sri Rakesh Kumar, General Secretary, of K.M.C. , Asansol .

: Coal .

Industry

State

: West Bengal . Dated 21-12-2004 AWAR

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Govt. of India, through the Ministry of Labour vide its order No. L-22012/420/2003 - IR (CM-II) dated 4-10-2004 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by thisTribunal .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of New Kenda Colliery , Kenda Area of M/ s . Eastern Coaifields Limited in delaying employment to 1682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

Shri Angirananda son of Late Faujdar Harijan, Pit Clerk is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. After receipt of the aforesaid order of reference , summons were issued through the registered post to the respective parties and after having received the summons both the parties appeared in the Court . It is further clear from the record that a joint petition duly signed by the representative of both the respective parties praying therein to pass a settlement and was filed . It was jointly submitted bythe respective parties that the concerned workman being the dependent son of Late Faujdar Harijan , Pit Clerk has got employment in the colliery concerned and there is no dispute pending so the workman has no grievance against the management I a settlement award may be passed in the light of the above facts .

3. Perused the record and the contents of the joint petition filedby the parties. It is clear from the record and the submission of the representations of the parties that the delinquent workman Sri Angirananda , son of late Faujdar Harijan, Pit Clerk has got no grievance against the management as he has got employment in the capacity of being the dependent son of his late Faujdar Harijan. Now there is no need to keep the record pending as the workman also does not want to proceed with the case . As such it is hereby.

ORDERED

that let an award be and the same is passed by way of settlement. The petition so filed shall form part ofthe award. Copies ofthe award be sent to the Ministry ofLabour for information and needful . The reference is accordingly disposed off.

MD. SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005 का.आ. 582.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण आसन सोल (संदर्भ संख्या 78/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-22012/38/2000-आई.आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ] एन ०पी० केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 582.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 78/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of ECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005 .

[No. L - 22012/38 /2000 - IR(CM-II) ] N.P. KESAVAN, DeskOfficer

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT:

SRI MD. SARFARAZ KHAN, PresidingOfficer. Reference No. 78 of 2000

PARTIES: TheAgent, Bejdih Colliery,

(BMPGroup), SodepurArea under ECL . , P.O.Bejdih, Distt. Burdwan.....Management . Vrs

Workman.

Sri Nantu Chattaraj , Lamp Fitter , Represented by General Secretary , KoyalaMazdoor Congress , Gorai Mansion , Asansol, (West Bengal) ....

REPRESENTATIVES:

: Sri P. K. Das , Advocate. FortheManagement

FortheWorkman : Sri S. K. Pandey , General Secretary KoyalaMazdoor Congress , Asansol, (WB) .

: Coal.

Industry

State

: West Bengal . Dated 24-11-2004 . AWARD

Inexercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub -section ( 1 ) and Sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , Govemment of India, through the Ministry of Labour vide its order No. L-22012/38/2000- IR (CM - II) dated 6-9-2000 has been pleasedto refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bejdih Colliery,underECL in denying the regularisation of Sh. Nantu Chattaraj Lamp Fitter in the post of Assistant Cap Lamp Incharge for being he was deployed by the management since 1991 is legal , validandjustified ? If not, to what relief Sh. Chattaraj is entitled to and from which date ?"

2. On receipt of the aforesaid order of reference from the Ministry of Labour, summons were issued to the respective parties through the Registered Post and after having received the summons both the parties appeared in the Court and filed their different sets of written statement in support oftheir respective claims.

3. In brief compass the case of the workman concerned as per his written statement is that Nantu Chattaraj is a permanent employee of Bejdih Colliery designated as Lamp Fitter . The main case of the workman is that he has been working as Cap Lamp Incharge since 1991 with entire satisfaction to the management and his casewas also recommended for promotion as Asstt . Lamp 1683 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005 /माष 30, 1926

on 1-9-1995 . As per the settled principles of law the facts admitted need not be proved, so I do not think proper to discuss the aforesaid admitted facts .

Room Incharge by the Colliery authority as he was shouldering, full responsibility of Lamp Room Incharge since there was not Cap Lamp Room Incharge.

12. Now the main point to be considered by the Court is to sea as to whether the workman concerned was deployed by the management since 1991 in the post of Assistant Cap Lamp Incharge or not?.

13. From perusal of the record it transpires that Sri Nantu Chattaraj has been examined as a oral witness in support ofhis case. It is further clear from the record that someXerox Copies of the official letters have been filledas documentary evidence in support of this claim.

4. The further case of the workman is that Sh . Chattaraj was deployed as Cap Lamp Room Incharge due to the exigencies of work and the management had also confirmed that he was super using the job of Lamp Fitters and other Lamp personal since 1991. Besides this, maintenance of all records , registers, general maintenance of Lamp Room was also entrusted to him which was discharged to the satisfaction of the management. Hewas also given the responsibility for sending all types of reports inrespects ofLamp Room and safety etc. These all factors justified his claim for regularisation as Asstt. Lamp Room Incharge and a relief to that effect with all the back wages and other consequential benefits has been sought for.

5. On the other hand the case of the management as per its written statement on that the instant reference is not maintainable on the grounds that the concerned workman does not being to the union represented to the matter.

6. The maindefence case ofthe management is that the concerned workman was appointed as general mazdoor Cat. I w.e.f. 22-10-1987 and he was duly promoted to Cat. IV Lamp Fitter on 17-4-1997 as the statement made by the union in para 3 of this written statement is not true.

14. Copy of the Note-sheet No. 1809 dated 2-5-1998 (Ext. I) . Copy ofthe letter submitted to Area by W.O. В.С. Incline (Ext . 2) . Copy of the certificate of Madhyamik Pariksha (Ext. 3) . Copy of the certificate of Lamp Room Incharge (Ext. 4). Copy of letter of Manager B.C. Incline No. 648 dated 3-10-1996 (Ext . 5) . Copy of the letter of manager dated 20-8-1992 (Ext. 6) . Copy of the slips given bymanagement B.C. Incline showing the workman as Lamp Room Incharge (Ext . 7) . Letter of Manager to Dy .Manager, Sitarampur Area (Ext . 8) , Copy of the report of Manager (Ext. 9), Copy of the letters No. 563 dated 2-1-1993 & dated 3-6-1994 (Ext . 10 & 11 ) , Copy of authorisation dated 1-11-1992 (Ext. 12) , Copy of the report of pit safety committee (Ext . 13) and copy ofthe letter dated 3-11-1992 (Ext. 14) have been filed by the side of the workman concerned.

7. It is also the case of the management that the delinquent workman had came on transfer to Bejdih Colliery on 1-9-1999 and he is the junior most fitter amongs three other fitters ofthe colliery. The statement made in para-5 is also denied and claimed that he was not entrusted any sorts of work beyond the job for his designation and so the question I recommendation of his name does not arise.

8. The further case of the management is that the concernedworkman does not hold necessary qualification to the post of Assü . Lamp Cabin Incharge. As per NCWA for the post in particular an employee of Tech -D must possess 3 years experience on Lamp Fitter Cat. -V followed by a DPC/Selection of Cat. V Lamp Fitters only. Regularisation is admitted to be a right but the same can only be enforced after obtaining necessary qualification and experience and availability ofthe vacancy and as such the concerned workman does not hold good requisites and no vacancy is found at Bejdih Colliery . The workman concerned is claimed to be not entitled to any relief and the action taken by the management is said tojustified.

15. Sri Nantu Chattar . as categorically stated in hisevidence on affidavit that in B.C. Incline he was a Lamp Incharge and was promoted as Chargeman on 9-8-1992 in B.C. Inline and as during the relevant time there was no Lamp Cabin Incharge he had been working and managing the Lamp Cabin properly. He has further stated that he is now designated as Fitter Category IV and he has been Supervising the job of Lamp Fitter in B.C. Incline since 1991. He has also claimed that he has been performing the job as Lamp Cabin Incharge satisfactory and in support of hisabove contention he has filed the relevant documents . The leamed lawyer for the management has not taken any material contradiction to discredit the testimony of the workman concerned virtually there is no cross -examination on the relevant points in issue and in absence of any cross- examination on the relevant points the statements of the workman with regard to his claim for regularisation in the post remains intact.

9. In view of the pleadings of the parties and the materials available in the record I do find certain facts which are admitted bythe respective parties. So before entering into the discussion of the merit of the case I would like to mention the facts which are admitted one .

10. It is the admitted fact that the concerned workman Nantu Chattaraj is a permanent employee ofthe Bejdih Colliery under ECL. It is also admitted case that the workman was appointed as general mazdoor on 22-10-1987 in B.C. Incline under Sitarampur Area of M/ s . E.C. Ltd. , who was promoted to category IV Lamp Fitter on 17-4-1997.

11. The further admitted case is that subsequently theworkman concerned was transferred to Bejdih Colliery

16. Ext . I is the Note-sheet dated 3-5-1998 given by the manager B.C. Incline Colliery with all the details bio-data of the workman concerned to consider his appointment for the post ofAsstt . Lamp Cabin Incharge. This recommendation letter goes to show that Sri Nantu Chattaraj has been supervising the job of Lamp Fitter in B.C. Incline since the year 1991. It is clearly mentioned that the maintenance of all records , registers , general maintenance of Lamp Room has been entrusted to him, which has been unorder upto the satisfaction of the management . He has also been responsible for all types of reports and all Cap Lamps in good working order, which is required fromtime to time by management since years as therewas no Lamp Cabin Incharge is posted at B.C. Incline .

1684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/ MAGHA 30, 1926

to It is also mentioned therein that he has got proficiency certificate for maintenance of Cap Lamp and servicing from Macnell and Mager Ltd. , Calcutta . This fact goes to support that the workman concerned has get the requisite technical qualification along with the experience . Copy of theletter submitted to the Area by W.O. B.C. Incline dated 28-4-99 (Ext. 2) also goes to show the nature ofjob entrusted to the workman concerned which was being discharged with full satisfaction of the management . The workman has filed the copy of the certificate of Secondary Examination (Ext. 3) , which he had passed in the year 1979 , likewise the certificate of proficiency awarded to Nantu Chattaraj , Lamp Room Incharge for taking comprehensive. Training Programme in Installation Maintenance & Servicing of old-hand Cap Lamps granted by Macnell & Mager Ltd. , Mining Division, Calcutta has also been filed. These Exts. 3 & 4 go to show that he possess the requisite qualification for the said post. The letter of theManager , B.C. Incline No. 648 dated 3-10-1996 (Ext . 5) is a proposal promote Sri Chattaraj as Cat. - V Lamp Fitter. This letter also supports the facts that the workman has been working sincerely and efficiently as chargeman and even if there is no Lamp Cabin Incharge at B.C. Incline Colliery Sri Chattaraj has been managing the Lamp Cabin properly . Besides this the workman has been several times authorised by the Manager to collect Cap Lamp material by the Manager vide letters dated 3-11-92, 1-11-92 , 20-8-92 and these letters have been produced and marked Ext . 6, 7, 8, 12, 14. By letter No. 563 dated 2-1-93 (Exts . 10) the workman concemed was asked by theAgent to keep Cap Lamp Room in order and to require a reward of Rs . 500/- on the eve of the general inspection of the B.C. Incline by the Mining Mechanical and electrical inspections from D. G.M.S. , Office a letter (Ext.9)was also issued to the Lamp Incharge Nantu Chattaraj by the Manager, B.C. Incline Colliery for better performance atthe time of safety inspection . This letter also proves that Mr. Chattaraj was all along discharging the job of Lamp Incharge. A copy of three page minutes of meeting of P.S.C. dated 8-10-96 has been filed which proves the fact that there is no Lamp Cabin Incharge and Sri Nantu Chattaraj , Chargeman is maintaining thejob .

17. On the other hand no oral or documentary evidence has been tendered by the management in support of its claim . Besides this the management has not challenged the genuineness of the aforesaid series of documents filed on behalf of the union in support of his claim. All the documents filed by the workman concerned are the official letters issued by the management, so there is no scope to disbelieve the correction and genuineness of the contents ofthe aforesaid documents . These all documents filed by the workman concerned itself speak too much about the claim of the workman and contradicts the averments made inthe W.S. Filed by the management. No chit of paperhas been filed to discredit the claim of the workman .

18. In view of the above facts , circumstances , evidence and the discussion made 1 am satisfied to hold that Sh . Nantu Chattaraj the workman has been working continuously as Asstt . Cap Lamp Incharge from 1991 and he possess all the requisite qualification and experience for regularisation in the post of Asstt . Lamp Room Incharge. And as such it is hereby ordered that the action of the

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] management , Bejdih Colliery under ECL in denying the regularisation of the concerned workman Sri Nantu Chattaraj , Lamp Fitter in the post of Asstt . Cap Lamp Incharge is not at all legal , valid and justified and accordingly Sh . Nantu Chattaraj is entitled to be regularised inthe post of Asstt . Cap Lamp Incharge with effect from the date on which the proposal for consideration of his posting as Asstt . Lamp Cabin Incharge in B : C . Incline Colliery was sent by the Manager i.e. 2-5-98 with all his back wages and other consequential benefits which will serve the ends ofjustice . Accordingly it is hereby .

ORDERED

that let an award be and the same is passed . Copies of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour for information and needful . The refcrence is accordingly disposedoff.

MD . SARFARAZ KHAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 583.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी. सी.सी.एल.के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण आसनसोल (संदर्भ संख्या 19/1999 ) को प्रकशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-22012/495/1996- आई.आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 583. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 19/1999 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court, Asansolas shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of BCCL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005.

[No. L- 22012/495/ 1996 - IR( CM- II)] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL PRESENT:

SRI MD. SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer .

Reference No. 19 of 1999 .

PARTIES:

TheAgent, Damagoria Colliery , M/s . BCCL , P.O. Kalyaneswari , Distt. Burdwan Vrs. Management.

Workınan.

Sri Ladoo Singh, Switchman Represented by Janta Mazdoor Sangh (HMS), Damagoria Colliery, P.O. Kalyaneswari , Distt. Burdwan

יוי [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

REPRESENTATIVES :

: Sri P. K. Das , Advocate .

For the management

Forthe Workman : Sri S. K. Singh,

(Union)

Br. Secretary of JantaMazdoor Sangh , P.O. Kalyaneswari , Distt. Burdwan.

Coal.

Industry:

State:

: West Bengal . Dated 23-12-2004 .

AWARD

Inexercise ofthe powers conferred by clause ( d) of Section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), Govt . of India, through the Ministry of Labour vide its order No. L -22012/495/ 96 - IR ( C- II ) dated 5-2-1999 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Damagoria Collieryin not referring Shri Ladoo Singh, Switchman to Apex Medical Board for determination of age having disparity in the date of birth, is justified? If not, towhat relief is the concerned workman entitled to?"

2. In pursuance of the summons issued by this Tribunal through the registered post, both the parties appeared in the Court through their respective representative and filed theirdifferent sets of written statements in support oftheir claimes.

3. Inbrief compass the case of the delinquent workman as per his written statement is that the date of birth of Sri Ladoo Singh, Switchman, Damagoria Colliery of M/ s. BCCL recorded in Form ' B ' is 1-7-1950 where as it is recorded in I.D. Card as 25 years on 1-1-1997 which goes to show clear cut variation in the age of Sri Singh in various statutory records ofthe company.

4. The further case of the workman concerned is that as perclause C of 1-1-76 of NCWA- III . The date of birth recorded in the records of the company namely Form ' B' register, C.M.P.F. records and Identity Cards (untampered) will be find provided that there is a variation in the age recorded in the records mentioned above the matter will be referred to the age determination committee . Medical Board Constituted by the management for determination oftheage.

5. It is also the case of the workman that the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal , Asansol has passed several award regarding such type of dispute in which the Hon'ble Tribunal has ordered the management of M/ s . BCCL to send the workman concerned before the age determination committee/Medical Board for determination of correct age. The management of Damagoria Colliery have not referred or send Sri Singh before the age determination committee/Medical Board due to discreminatory attitute.

6. On the other hand the case of the management as per its written statement inter- alia that the date of birth of Sri

1685

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30 , 1926

Ladoo Singh, Switchman of Damagoria Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL as recorded in statutory B Form Register is 1-7-1950 . The date of birth claimed by the union as 1-1-1952 is absolutely illegal and beyond the record.

7. The main case of the management is that during the preparation of service Excepts which was issued to each and every workman in the year 1987. Sri Ladoo Singh , Switchman was also served the service excerpts in which his date of birth is clearly mentioned as 1-1-1950 and he never disputed his date of birth in the service file.

8. The identity card issued during the year 1977 without any authenticity or signature with seal in the issuing authority is not tenable at this stage at all . Identity Card is issued only for the purpose of identity of a person as an employee and is not a base record regarding the age of any employee.

9. It is also the case of the management that the management of Damagoria Colliery has not referred his casebefore the age determination committe/Medical Board as per I.I. No. 76 since Sri Ladoo Singh has not disputed his date of birth in his service excerpts . Besides this no where is colliery records even in statutory records there is any variation in the age .

10. From perusal of the record it transpires that the case wasfixed for argument but in the mean - time a petition duly signed by the representatives of both the parties praying therein to refer the dispute to the Apex Medical Board for assessment of the age of the workman concerned was filed. The documents filed by the workman concerned go to support the claim of the workman. Admittedly according to the identity card issued to the workman by the management the date of birth of Sri Ladoo Singh. Switchman is 26 years on 1-1-1977 . But according to Form 'B' Register the date of birth is recorded as 1-7-1950 . So from the record itself there cannot be any hesitation to cometo the finding that there are two different sets ofdate of birth of the workman concerned. According to the instruction No. 76 of the J.B.C.C.I. Implementation Report, if there is a variation in the age recorded in the official records of the management , the matter is to be referred to age determination committe/Medical Board Constitutedby themanagement for determination of age. I find that it is a fit case which must be referred to Medical Board for determination of age of the delinquent workman .

11. Inview ofthe above facts circumstance , documents petition filed by the parties and the discussion made I am satisfied to held that the instruction No. 76 of the J.B.C.C.I. Implementation Report is fully applicable in the present fact of the case . And as such it is hereby

ORDERED

that let the management be directed to refer the workman concemed toApex Medical Board for determination of his age within seven days of the receipt of the award. The finding oftheApex Medical Board shall be final and binding upon both the parties . Accordingly the award is passed and the reference is disposed off. Copies of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour at the earliest for information and needful .

M. D. SARFARAZ KHAN , Presiding Officer 1686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 25 जनवरी , 2005

1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause ' D ' of sub-sections 1 & 2 (A) to Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (hereinafter referredto as the ' Act ') has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under:-

का.आ. 584.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, नेशनल रिसर्च सेन्टर आन इकविन प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जयपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी. 19/2003 ) को प्रकशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -42012/ 151/2002 - आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management of National Research Centre on Equine in terminating the services of Sh. Ashok Kumar S/ o Sh. Hema Ram w.e.f. 2.5.99 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

New Delhi , the 25th January, 2005

S. O. 584.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGIT- 19/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of National Research Centre on Equines and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 24-01-2005.

[No. L-42012/ 151 /2002-IR(CM - II)]

N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

Case No. CGIT- 19/2003

Reference No. L -42012/ 151 /2002 (IR-CM- II)

2. Theworkman in his statement of claim has pleaded that he was employed on daily wages basis on 1-3-95 at the National Research Centre on Equine ( for short, NRCE) at Shivbari in Bikaner by an oral order , who continuously worked up to 2-5-99 and on 1-5-99 the in- charge of the NRCE issued an experience certificate in his favour. But when he urged the authorities to regularize his service, he was verbally terminated on 2-5-99 in contravention of the provision under Section 25 -F of the Act. he has further stated that hehad completed over 240 days ofactual service and the work performed by him was of perennial nature. At the time of his ternimation, the junior employees to him , viz. , Sh . Amar Chand, Sh. Shankar Lal and Sh . Devendra were retained by the management in violation of Section 25-G of the Act . He raised the dispute before the Conciliation Officer who filed the failure report to the Central Government, which has referred the dispute to this Court. He has urged to reinstate him in the service with its continuity and back -wages.

Sh. Ashok Kumar ,

S/o Sh . Hema RamHarijan, R/o Village & Post-Shivbari , HarijanBasti , Bikaner

...Applicant

Versus

1.Director,

3. The contesting non -applicants No. 1 & 2 have disputed the claim of the workman in their written counter, who have stated that the non- applicant management being purely a research centre is not an industry as defined under Section 2 - J of the act and that the workman was never appointedby them in any capacity. They have further stated that the non-applicants No. 3 & 4, who are the contractors , couldhave employed him on contractual basis. They have also stated that the payment of wages was never made to theworkman on behalf of the management.

National Research Centre on Equine , SirsaRoad, Hissar (Haryana) -124001

4. In the rejoinder , the workman has reiterated the facts that he was employed in the NRCE by the in -charge by his oral order , that the work assigned to him was of the perennial nature, that he was never employed through the contractorandthat there is a relationship of employer and employee between the non - applicants No. 1 & 2 and him.

2.Office InCharge, National Research Centre on Equine, Jorbeer, Village & Post-Shivbari , Bikaner 3. Sh. Prabhu Singh Shekhawat, Contractor, Indra Colony, Bikaner

5. On the pleadings of the parties , the following points for determination were framed:-

4. Sh. S.N. Agarwal , Contractor, 576,Gandhi Nagar, Bikaner

...Non-Applicants

I Whether the non- applicant management had employed the workman as Casual Labour on 1-3-1995 , who had continuously worked from 1-3-1995 to 2-5-1999 and has, thus, worked for more than 240 days in the calendar year ?

PRESENT :

: Sh. R. C. Sharma

Presiding Officer

IL Whether the service of the workman was terminated in violation of the provisions Section 25- F of the Act?

Sh . Shiv Avtar Singh .

Forthe applicant

Sh. V. S.Gurjar .

For the non -applicants :

III Whether the juniors to the workman were retained by the non- applicant management at the time of 29-12-2004

Date of award

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

terminating the service of the workman in violation ofSection 25-G of the Act?

VI. Whether the National Research Centre on Equine does not fallwithin the definition of the industry as definedunderthe provisions of theAct?

VRelief, ifany..

6. In the evidence, the workman has submitted his affidavit, who was cross -examined on behalf of the non-applicants . In the defence , the counter- affidavit of Dr. S.N. Tandon, Officer incharge has been placed on the record, who was cross -examined on behalf of the workman. Both the parties have also led the documentary evidence onthe record .

-7. I have heard both the parties and have scanned the record. The point -wise discussion follows as under:- Point No. I & II

8. Sinceboth these points relate to the retrenchment, they are being discussed together.

9. The Id. representative for the workman contends that the workman has continuously worked from 1-3-95 to 2-5-99 with the non-applicant establishment NRCE and the experience certificate Ex. W-1 was also issued by the incharge of the NRCE . He was conducting the exercise of the horses and was looking after the husbandry works related to the NRCE . His next contention is that no written contract was executed between both the parties and the payment ofwages was made to the workman by the non- applicants , which was on some occasions given to him through the contractor. It has also been contended that theworkperformed by the workman even exists today and prior to the termination, one month's notice or pay in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation was not paid to him. Theld. representative to strengthen his submissions has relied upon 1999 Lab IC SC 1323 and 2004 SCC 506.

10. Countering these submission , the Id. representative for the non - applicants submits that the duty is on the workman to prove that he has completed 240 days ofwork with the management, which he has failed to prove as he has not placed even a single document which says that he was ever employed by the management on whatsoever basis . The next contention is that the non- applicants has filed the attendance sheet of the employees wherein the name of the workman does not appear as a casual worker. When the workman was required for a particular phase, he was employed but he was never appointedby the non -applicants , nor the payment ofwages was made to him by it. In support of his contention, the ld. representative has referred to (2002) 3 SCC 25.

11. I have heard both the parties and have scanned the record.

12. The workman's case is that he was employedby the non -applicant management on daily wages basis who continuously worked from 1-3-95 to 2-5-99 and has thus completed over 240 days ofactual service in the calender year preceding to the date of his termination. Per contra, the stand ofthe management is that the workman was never

1687

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30 , 1926

engaged by it, who could have been the employee of the contractor andfor contingent work his services were hired fromthe contractor and that no payment of wages was madeby the management to him.

13.On behalfofthe workman, in support ofhis case, the experience certificate Ex. W- 1 has been placed on the record, which has been issued by Dr. M.K. Singh, the incharge of NRCE and it says that it is certified that Sh. Ashok Kumar is working on contract basis at NRCE since 1995. Thereafter, the nature of the work performed bythe workman is exhibited as the duties of cleaning and washing the husbandry, to conduct the exercises of the horses and to look after the husbandry work related to the horse management. This certificate has been issued on 1-5-99 . It clearly shows that the workman was serving the NRCEw.e.f. the year 1995 till 1-5-99 as a daily wager.

14.This certificate also depicts that he was employed on contract basis, but no written contract could be brought onthe record on behalf of the non -applicants which could suggest as towhether he was an employee of the contractor or he was employed by the management on contractual basis . Since it has been shown in the certificate that the workman was performing his duties on contract basis , it goes to show that he was employed by the management oncontractual basis as a daily wager. Thus, this certificate clearly establishes the relationship of employer and employee between both the contesting parties i.e. the non- applicants No. 1& 2 and the workmanhimself.

15. As against it, it has been argued on behalf of the non-applicants that the muster rolls/attendance sheets presented on the record by them does not contain the name ofthe workman as a casual worker . But this negative fact is not sufficient to rebut the facts which springs up from the experience certificate Ex. W- 1 , which manifestly states that the workman was serving at NRCE . There is nothing on the record to disbelieve the experience certificate Ex. W- 1 which has been issued by the incharge of the management.

16. The workman in his cross - examination has although admitted that he had received the payment of wages for one month from the contractor Sh. Prabhu Singh as well as from another contractor Sh . S.N. Agarwal respectively , yet he has categorically stated that the payment of wages was made to him by the incharge of the establishment whose name is Sh. M.K. Singh . The workmanwhile answering a question put to him onbehalf ofthe non-applicants has also emphatically denied this fact thathe had ever worked with the aforesaid contractors .

17. MW- 1 , Sh. S.N. Tandon in his cross-examination hasdenied this fact that Sh. M.K. Singh was the incharge ofthe non-applicant establishment in May , 1999 and has further stated that he had never been the incharge of the management, but he was a scientist only . In continuation ofthis , he has admitted that Ex. W- 1 bears his signature fromA to B.

18. Ex. W- 1 as has already been stated was issued on 1-5-99, which bears the signature of Dr. M.K. Singh (as incharge, NRCE) . On the one hand, the management 1688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

of the employer company. Under such circumstances, the Hon'ble Court has considered them to be employees of the company. The submission made on behalf of the workman that there is a relationship of employer and employee betweenboth the parties is strengthened by these judicial pronouncements and is accordingly accepted.

witness has deposed that in the month of May 1999 , Dr. M.K. Singh was not the in -charge and rather who had never been the in-charge of the management, but on the other hand, he has his admitted the signature on the experience certificate . Thus, his subsequent statement falsifies his previous statement that Dr. M.K. Singh was not the in-charge of the management in May, 1999. The certificate Ex. W- 1 appears to be genuine which has been issued by Dr. M.K. Singh in the capacity of in -charge of NRCE.

19. Thus , it follows from the aforesaid facts that the workman was employed on daily wages basis by the establishment who had continuously worked from 1-3-95 to 2-5-99 andhad completed over240 days of actual service with the management in the calendar year preceding to the date ofhis termination. It appears from the record thatprior to his termination one month's notice or pay in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation were not paid to him . Thus, the management has violated the provision under Section 25 - F ofthe Act .

23. The Id. representative for the non -applicants has drawn my attention towards the decision reported in(2002) 3 SCC 25 , wherein the Hon'ble Court has observed that where the workman's claim is that he had worked for more than 240 days in the year preceding to his termination, which was denied by the employer, then it was for the claimant to lead evidence to that effect and his affidavit was not sufficient evidence to prove this fact . Evidently, in the case at hand, the workman has also led the documentary evidence on the record as discussed above and on facts , it has been successfully proved by the workman that he had completed 240 days of actual work in the calendar year preceding to his termination . Hence, the Id. representative forthe non-applicants does not derive any assistance from thisdecision.

20.The Id. representative for the workman in support ofhis submissions has referred to 1999 Lab IC SC 1323 and 2004 SCC 506 .

24.On an analytical examination of the evidence led byboth the parties, points no. I & II are decided in favour ofthe workman and against the non - applicants no . 1 & 2.

21. In 1999 Lab IC SC 1323 , the observation made by the Hon'ble Apex Court is quoted as below :-

Point No. III

25. The workman in his statement of claim has narratedthe names of hisjunior employees as Amar Chand, Shankar Lal and Devendra and to this effect he has also filed his affidavit , but he could not be able to prove this fact by adducing the documentary evidence that these junior employees were retained at the time ofhis termination, nor he has furnished in his oral evidence the necessary particulars e.g. the dates of their appointment and their nature of the work so as to believe his testimony on this point . 1 , therefore, find that the testiniony of the workman on this point is vague and no supportive evidence could be led byby him . As such, this point is decided against the workman.

Point No. IV

26. TheId . representative for the non -applicants contends that NRCE is not an industry as it is not engaged inanyproduction, but it is simply a research centre which doesnot fall within the definition of the industry . TheId . representative in support of his submission has cited ( 1997) 4 SCC 257 , Arguing contra, the ld. representative for the workman contends that the non - applicant establishment hasalso the profit motive which falls under the category of the industry. He has referred to the decision reported in AIR 1978 SC 543 .

"However, on the facts of the present case, it was found by the Labour Court and as confirmed by the High Court that the so called contractor Kashmir Singh was a mere name lender and had procured labour for the Board from the open market . He was almost a broker or an agent oftheBoard for that purpose . The Labour Court also noted that the Management witness Shri A.K. Chaudhary also could not tell whether Shri Kashmir Singh was not a licensed contractor . Under these circumstances , it has to be held that factually there was no genuine contract system prevailing at the relevant time wherein the Board could have acted as only the principal employer and Kashmir Singh as a licensed contractor employing labour on his own account. It is also pertinent to mote that nothing was brought on record to indicate that even the Board at the relevant time, was registered as principal employer under the Contract Labour Regulation and Abolition Act . Once the Board was not a principal employer and the so called contractor Kashmir Singh was not a licensed contractor under the Act , the inevitable conclusion that had to be reached was to the effect that the so called contract system was a mere caniouflage, smoke and a screen and disguised in almost a transparent veil which could easily be pierced and the real contractual relationship between the Board, on the one hand , and the employees , on the other, could be clearly visualized . "

22. The facts of the referred to decision are squarely applicable to the present controversy . In 2004 SCC 506 , the Hon'ble Apex Court has also observed that when workmen are engaged to produce goods or services which were for another , that other must be the real employer . In this case, the workmen were the gardeners engaged through the contractor to sweep , clean and maintain the lounge inside the factory premises and campus of residential colony

27. In ( 1997) 4 SCC 257 , the facts are that the management was a public trust which was a research institute for conducting the research in space and allied sciences . It was financed mainly by the Central Government and the State of Gujarat . It was virtually an institute falling under the Government of India's Department of Space and its object was to conduct advance research in astronomy and astrophysics , etc. The research work was done in the

יוי 1689 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30, 1926

32. For the foregoing reasons , the workman has succeeded in establishing his claim and is entitled for the reinstatement.

instituteby the eminent scientists in resolving the problems offundamental science and it was not directly or indirectly carrying on any business and its business did not result in production anddistribution of goods or services calculated to satisfy human wants. On these facts , the Physical Research Laboratory was not considered to be an industry. As is evident, the facts of the referred to case have no resemblancewith the present controversy.

33.The reference, therefore, is answered in affirmative in favour of the workman and against the non - applicants andit isheld that the termination order dated 2-5-99 of the workman is illegal and unjustified. His claim is allowed and he is entitled for his reinstatement in service with its continuity along with 50 per cent back -wages . An award is passed inthese terms accordingly.

34. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Govemment forpublication under Section 17(1 ) of theAct .

28. Theld. representative for the workman has referred to AIR 1978 SC 543 , wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down the criteria for considering the establishment as industry under Section 2- J of the Act while following its earlier decision in AIR 1953 SC 58 as below:-

R. C. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.अ. 585.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी. पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण न . II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/96 ) को प्रकशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । "(a) Where ( i) systematic activity , ( ii ) organized byco-operation between employer and employee (the direct and substantial element is chimerical) (iii) forthe production and/or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes (not spiritual or religious but inclusive of material things or services geared to celestial bliss i.e. making, on a large scale prasad or food) prima facie, there is an industry in that enterprise.

(b)Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant, be the venture in the public,joint, private orother sector.

[सं० एल-42012/230/94- आई आर ( डीयू) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 28th January, 2005 (c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test isthe nature ofthe activity with special emphasis on the employer -employee relations.

(d) Ifthe organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy the undertaking."

29. Further, the Hon'ble Court goes on to observe as below:-

S. O. 585. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Govemmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 5/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court No. II, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to themanagement of CPWD and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 28-1-2005

[No. L-42012/230/94- IR(DU)]

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

"The consequences are (i) professions , ( ii) clubs, (iii) educational institutions , (iv) co -operatives, (v) research institutes, (vi ) charitable projects and ( vii ) other kindred adventures, ifthey fulfil the triple tests listed in I (supra. ), cannot be exemped from the scope of Section 2 (j ) . '

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT-IL, NEW DELHI

L.D. No. 5/96 Presiding Officer, R. N. Rai

30. Applying these tests , the Hon'ble Court has observed that the research institutions with " its discoveries are valuable contributions to the wealth of the nation. Such discoveries may be sold for a heavy price in the industrial or other markets. Technology has to be paid for and technological inventions and innovations may be patented and sold".

Inthe matter of:-

Sh. Vijay Singh & Others,

C/oGeneral Secretary, CPWD MazdoorUnion, E-26, (Old Qtr. ), Raja Bazar, Baba Kharak SinghMarg, NewDelhi-110001,

Versus

31. Thus , the Hon'ble Court has clearly laid down that the research institutes albeit run without profit motive are also industries . The views expressed by the Hon'ble Larger Bench of the Apex Court strengthen the contention canvassed on behalf of the workman that the NRCE is a industry within the meaning of Section 2-J of the Act and is accordingly acceptable. This point, therefore, is decided against the non - applicants and in favour of the workman .

TheDirector General Works, CPWD, NirmanBhawan, NewDelhi.

414 GI/2005-29 1690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( li ) ] AWARD

TheMinistry ofLabourby its letter No. L -42012/230/ 94- IR(DU) Central Government dt. 27-12-1995 has referred the followingpoint for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder:

CPWD Chandigarh. That Shri Dharam Pal is now getting wages directly from the office of Executive Engineer, Chandigarh Central Division - I w.e.f. 01-04-1995 and his services were called as Work Order driver. That Shri Dharam Palwas recruited directly through the Executive Engineer, Chandigarh Central Division - I and payment was made to him w.e.f. 01-01-1992 to 31-03-1995 by the so called contractor with a view to deny him the privilege and facilities ofa regular workman.

"Whether the action of the management of CPWD in treating (Sh. Vijay Singh , Dharam Pal , Gita Ram Drivers) as employee employed on workorder and denying themwages ofregular driver in the scale ofRs. 950-1500 and in not regularising their services is just and fair ? If not, what relief the workmen entitled to and from which date."

The union has filed statement of claim on behalf of the workmen. In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the particulars of each workman are given as under:

That Shri Gita Ram S/ o Shri Jai Ram was engaged as Motor Lorry Driver on 21-10-1990 on Work Order and getting the wages directly through the Office of Executive Engineer , Chandigarh Central Division - II , CPWD , Chandigarh . That Shri Gita Ram got wages from 21-10-1990 to 30-06-1992 at Rs . 1158/- per month, w.e.f. 01-07-1992 to 30-09-1992 at the rate of Rs . 1283 per month . 01-10-1992 to 30-05-1993 at the rate of Rs . 1283 per month and w.e.f. 01-06-1993 to till date getting minimum wages as fixed by theappropriate Government from time to time.

(a) That S/Shri Vijay Singh, Dharam Pal , Gita Ram have been performing duties as Motor Lorry Drivers under different divisions ofthe above management.

(b) That S/Shri Vijay Singh and Dharam Pal were engaged in Chandigarh Central Division - I , CPWD and Shri Gita Ram in Chandigarh Central Division- II. CPWD , Chandigarh .

That the above four types of workmen are performing same and similar duties but the management is discriminating them in the payment of wages which is discriminatory and unfair labour practice. That Motor Lorry Driverworking on work charged establishment/muster rool and hand receipt were getting extra wages after 48 hours a week at double the rates and are getting overtime wages as Rs.30 perhourbut the above workmen connected with the dispute are getting much less overtime wages which is 'violative of the provisions of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 . That all the daily rated workmen on muster roll and hand receiptwere getting their wages in the time scale as per the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Surender Singh & Ors . Vs. Engineer- in-Chief, CPWD and ors . Dt . 17-01-1986 and the workmen connected with the dispute performing same and similar duties are not getting their wages as equal to the daily rated workmen so the management is also violating the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgement as referred to above .

(c) That Shri Vijay Singh S/ o Shri Gabbar Singh was engaged as Motor Lorry Driver on 04-01-1991 to 31-03-1991 on hand receiptand during this period he was paid full wages in the time scale ofRs . 950-1500 i.e. Rs . 1629/- permonth. Thereafter his services were treated aswork order w.e.f. 01-04-1991 to 31-09-1991 . That payment to Shri Vijay Singh was made through contractor Shri Om Prakash Mehra from 01-10-1991 to 31-03-1995 without any notice asprescribed under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and with a view to deny the status and privilege of a permanent workman. Payment to Shri Vijay Singh was made directly from01-04-1995 as fixed under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 from time to time.

(d) That Shri Vijay Singh was selected directlyby the Executive Engineer , Chandigarh Central Division- 1 , CPWD and he is driving Jeep No. CHD3642.

That the action of management in not confirming the above workmen by way of regularisation of their services is indulging in unfair labour practices as provided in the Fifth Schedule of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. That the workman S/Shri Vijay Singh, Dharam Pal and Gita Ram are performing their duties under the direct control of the management including attendance , chart of duties and are driving theirjeeps and come under the definition of Section 2(s) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947.

> (e) That Shri Dharam Pal S/o Shri Ram Singh was engaged initially as Motor Lorry Driver on 1st January, 1992 and was getting total wages of Rs. 1180 per month upto 07-07-1993 and from August 1993 he was getting total wages of Rs . 2773 per month . Now he is gettingwages inthe time scale .

That Shri Dharam Pal was paid his wages w.e.f. 01-01-1992 to 31-03-1995 by a third person Shri Om Prakash Mehra treating him a contractor camouflagedly. The workman Shri Dharam Pal is driving Jeep No. DBG 8668 of the management directly under the control and supervision ofExecutive Engineer, Chandigarh Central Division - 1

That the management intentionally treating the workmen as contractors to the management but the fact remains that the workmen themselves are doing thejob of driverand their work is being supervised by the concerned officer of CPWD and they are working directly under the control ofthe management but the management is calling them as Work Order/ contractors which is against the labour laws . That the Executive Engineer of Chandigarh Central Division I & I , CPWD are directly working under the control ofDirector General Works , CPWD , Nirman Bhawan , New Delhi . That denial of equal pay for equal work and the status of permanent workman to the above workmen is 1691 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

ofCPWD and therefore action of departmental indenying them scale ofRs. 950 1500 and regularisation oftheir services is absoutely fair and justified . The management cannot agreewith schedule ofthe Ministry of Labour, Government ofIndia'sorderNo. L-42012/230/94- IR (DU) dt. 17-12-1995 because contractor doing jobs on work order do not come under the purview of Industrial Dispute Act, so their application may therefore be straight away rejected.

discriminatory and unlawful. That the Government of India, Central Public Works Department vide their order No. 38/2/87 -EC.X dt. 30-09-1992 have sanctioned 8982 posts for regularisation of daily rated workers in compliance of the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court India. That the management have regularised many jun persons to the concerned workmen on the time scale but the workmen connected with this dispute were discriminated after the order ofthe Hon'ble Supreme Court.

It issubmitted that Sh. Vijay Singh and Sh. Dharam Palcontractors has been engaged on work order basisto perform specificjobs of motor lorry drivers in this division. They are contractors and not work charged employee of the department. Sh. Vijay Singh S/o Sh. Gabbar Singh contractor was allotted the work as contractor to provide persons to perform duties of motor lorny drivers w.e.f. 01-04-1991 to 31-09-1991 and there after the contract was given to Sh. Om Prakash Mehra, contractor for providing ofdrivers w.e.f. 11/91 to 7/92 and from 8/92 to 3/95 work orders were given to agencies like Sh. Rajinder Singh . Sh. Rakesh Kumar and Sh . Pala Ram & Co. etc. and payments were made to them. Photocopies of work orders enclosed. As stated above no notice is required to be given to person working on work order basis . Hence the claim of Sh. Vijay Singh is denied for status and privilege of permanent workman .Hewas being paid as per notificationbyD.C.U.T. Administration, Chandigarh.

That the above workmen connected with the dispute are performing management's duties whose business are connected with the work of construction of buildings, maintenance ofbuildings , sanitation , construction of roads, supply of electricity from electrical stations/ sub -stations and water supply owned by the Central Govt . and come under the definition of Payment of Wages Act and so are also covered by the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act and rules made there under, and about more than 500 workers are engaged by the management . That according to Model Standing Rules under Industrial Employment Act, a workman having completed 90 days of continuous service deemed to have attained the status of permanent workman and the management has been want only denying the facilities to the workman and thereby discriminating them amongst the same employmentswhich is nothing than the hostile discrimination against the workmen connected with this dispute . That as per Model Standing Orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 , in Schedule - I, the operative portion is reproduced as under.

Sh. Dharam Pal S/o Sh. Ram Singh was employedby Sh . Om Prakash Mehra contractor to whom work orders for providing ofmotor lorry driver was given and payments were made to him as per terms of work order w.e.f. 01-01-1992 to 31-07-1992 from 8/92 to 3/95 orderswasplaced to agencies as stated inpara 2(c) above to whom contract forSupply ofmotor lorry drivers for driving the vehicle of Executive Engineer, Chandigarh Central Division No. 1 was awardedand so the payments were made to those agencies No condition/ term of employing Sh . Vijay Singh or Sh. DharamPal as M.L. Driver was stipulated in work order andcontractorwas free to employ any licenced driver.The claim of Sh. Dharam Pal that he is getting time scale now is totally baseless and is denied . Neither he is being given any time scale nor he has been recruited directly through EE/CCDI and so his claim for privilege and facilities of regular workmen is rejected as he is not work charged employeebut a contractor performing duties on work order onbasis ofquotations submitted by him from time to time.

The management has filed written statement. In the written statement, it has been stated that it is submitted that in the I.D. No. 5/96 of abovementioned dispute, the case relating to Sh . Vijay Singh and Sh. Dharam Pal contractors who worked as motor lorry drivers on work orderbasis in form PWD 11 (Work Order ) as per para 15.2.6. of CPWD Manual Vol . II . These form are used in cases in which it is necessary to staff work in anticipation of formal acceptance of contract . Form PWD 11 is used when it is not necessary to draw agreement on piece work . Any work awarded on form PWD 11 may be stopped or cancelled by Engineer- in-Charge at any time without any notice and the. contractor isalso bound to stop the work at any time without being required to pay any compensation. Also , it is intimated that CPWD, Mazdoor Union, E-26 (Old Quarters), RajaBazar, Baba Kharak Singh Marg, New Delhi represents the work charged employees of the Central Govt. In department of CPWD in Ministry of Urban Affairs & Employment Govt . ofIndia.

Asalready stated in the foregoing paras . Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal, employee of contractor has been doing the job of M.L. Driver was awarded to different contractors on work order which is another form ofcontract agreement agreeable to both parties for a specific period on the monthly rates. As Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal are not at all an employee classified in the work charged staffor a regular staff under the Govt. of India whose salary isdrawnfrom the consolidated fund of India Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal is only employees of contractorsdoing thejob ofM.L. Drivers on work order basis. Management isnot making any discdiscrimination or unfair iabour practice becausepay& allowances give to M.L. Driver regia establishment cannot be paid to a contractorsto a Itisfurther added that Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal Contractor (M.L. Drivers) are not work charged employee in CPWD instead they are performing job allotted to them on work orders as motor lorry drivers and so they cannot be equated to work charged staff. Hence both are outside the jurisdiction of CPWD Mazdoor Union which is representing body of only work charges staff of CPWD and this Union has no right to fight and take up cases ofso calledcontractors . The DGW, CPWD cannot treat Sh. Vijay Singh and Sh . Dharam Pal as an employee of Department 1692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

Pal, contractor cannot be deemed to be a workman. Thus contents of the Model Standing Orders under the Industrial Employment ( Standing Orders) Act, 1946 are notjudiciously applicable in the instant case .

workman on work charged establishment or regular establishment. He cannot be considered as a workman. Sh . Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal are contractor/ employees of contractor engaged on work order basis . The benefits of a driveron regular or work charged establishment connotbe extended to a contractor/ employees of contractors i.e. Sh . Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal .

It is stated that Sh . Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal , contractorwas engaged on work order basis to do the job of motor lorry driver. He cannot be equated with the workmen who are working under the Govt . of India under thework charged establishment or even daily rated workers, not to speak of regular driver of the Department Management totally and comprehensively disagree with the point raised by Sh . B.K. Prasad , General Secretary , CPWD Mazdoor Union and Authorised Representative that Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal is a workman. In fact, they cannot take up the case of any contractor and is solely outside the jurisdiction of Mazdoor Union of CPWD .

The claimants have filed rejoinder through General Secretary, CPWD Mazdoor Union and they have almost reiterated the averments of the statements of claims .

It issubmitted that the payments made to Sh . Vijay Singh & Sh . Dharam Pal , contractor/ employee of contractors doing the job of M.L. Driver on work order basis, as per terms and conditions of contract. He has not worked on any regular establishment or work charged establishment . He is not governed by the rules and regulations of permanent Govt . employee . There is no violation of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 as this Act is not attracted in this instant case . Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh . Dharam Pal, Contractor engaged on work order basis for the job of M.L. Driver is governed by terms and conditions of work orderand payment made accordingly . He is not a workman onthe work charged establishment of CPWD and connot be paid wages equal to daily rated workman.

The management has filed written statement. Most ofthe paras of the statement of claim have been denied. The management has asserted that the workman applicants were contract workers and they worked on work order . They were not the regular employees so the question of their regularisation does not arise .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused thepapers on the record. It was submitted from the side of theworkmen that it is almost admitted to the management that Shri Vijay Singh started the work of Motor Lorry Driver on04-01-1991 . Similarly , Shri Dharam Pal also startedwork ofLorryDriver from 1-1-1992 . Similarly , Shri Gita Ram also discharged duties ofMotor Lorry Driver from 21-10-1990.

Itissubmitted that Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal, contractor has been engaged on work order basis , as already stated in the above noted paras . He is not a work charged employee and also he is not governed by the rules and regulations ofregular establishment, since he is a contractor his case cannot be referred to by Shri B. K. Prasad, General Secretary , CPWD Mazdoor Union and authorised representative . The case regarding regularisation of his services cannot be entertained as stated in the preliminary para . Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal , contractor has been engaged on work order basis to do the job of M.L. Driver. Due to nomenclature of work order and his entitlement as a contractor he cannot be covered under the ambit of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The definition of 2(S) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 cannot be embraced in this case.

The averment of Sh. B.K. Prasad, General Secretary, CPWD Mazdoor Union & authorised representative that theworkmen connected with this dispute i.e. Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal , contractors were discriminated for regularisation is not at all cogent, convincing and simply frivolous and flimsy . As already stated in above noted several paragraphs & preliminary para of this reply , Sh . Vijay Singh & Sh . Dharam Pal, contractor has been engaged onworkeders and for specific job of M.L. Driver . He does not forne part of any seniority unit of establishment of work chd employees/daily -rated employees or regular establiment , therefore , there is no question of any discrimination , as alleged in this para .

All the three workmen have been getting monthly wages . They have been working til ! date as is evident from the evidence . The management witness has given evidence in 2002 and he has stated that all the three workmen applicant have been working but they are working as contractor's men and on work order basis, they are not the regular employees of the management . Shri Gita Ram has stated that he was under the control of Supdtg. Engineer , Chandigarh Central Circle . Shri Dyan Singh, the Executive Engineer has given the evidence and in his evidence , he has stated that all the three drivers are not work charged -employee in the CPWD instead they are performing thejob allotted to them as a contractor's man . They have been working on work order or as contractor's man . Shri Gita Ram, Contractor is performing the job ofdriver and he has been paid overtime allowance as per condition of work order. Shri Gita Ram is also a contractor . Shri Dharam Pal is also a contractor and Shri Vijay Singh is also a contractor and all the three employees have been working as independent contractors as per the evidence of MW/1 the Executive Engineer . They have been paid overtime allowance . These contractors have been assigned work according to work order. Shri Vijay Singh has deposed in hiscross-examination that he worked as Contractor's man and contract was given to Shri Om Prakash. He worked on behalf of Shri Om Prakash upto 31-7-1992 thereof contract was given to Shri Rajinder Singh and he worked under that The contents of model standing orders under the Industrial Employment ( Standing Orders ) Act, 1946 in Schedule - I relating to industrial establishment not being industrial establishments in coal mines is not attracted in the instant case . Classification of workman viz permanent, probationers , badlies , temporary, casual and apprentices are not at all operable in the case of Sh . Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam Pal , contractor who has been engaged on work order basis and doing the job of motor lorry driver . Under any stretch of imagination Sh. Vijay Singh & Sh. Dharam 1693 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/ माघ 30, 1926

that the lorries and jeeps have been purchased for keeping them in garages . It is also admitted that the workmen applicants have been engaged from 1991 and they are still discharging the duties of drivers over the two jeeps and lorries.

contractor. After that contract was given to Shri Pala Ram . Thereafter, again the contract was given to Shri Rajinder Singh . Shri Rakesh Kumar was given contract for 1-5-1994 to 30-04-1995 after that work orders were issued to him. He pays subscription to the union. He has also admitted that he has never worked as worker of CPWD . He has also admitted that he has worked on the basis of work order as a contractor and through the contractor . He is a member of CPWD Mazdoor Union. As such , all the workmen applicants have admitted that they have worked through contractor and they are not the worker ofCPWD.

My attention was drawn to JT -2003 ( 1 ) SCC-472, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a master is one who notonlyprescribed to the workman the end of his work but directs or at any moment may direct the means also , or, he hasthe power of controlling the work, a servant is a person subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work. In case, this criteria is applied, theExecutiveEngineer of the Division Nos . I and II, CPWD Chandigarh are the masters as drivers are under their control and according to their order and directions , they work and the respondents have the power ofcontrolling the workman sotheworkmen applicants are servants under the command oftheir masters, the CPWD. In view of this recent decision also, the workmen applicants became the employees ofthe respondents . In 2004 (1 ) SCC- 126, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down certain criteria to ascertain the employer and employee relationship, the principle employer andthe contract labour. According to this criteria, there are two factors which constitute the relationship of employer and employee -control and integration. In this case, the work is organised for the drivers, tools and materials are given to the drivers. Ifthis criteria is followed, thena contract employee becomes direct employee of the management.

It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that in 2001 (7) SCC, a larger Bench of the Hon'ble High Court has held that if there is contract of service, then the workman becomes the employee of the management and if there is contract for service , then they will remain contractor's men. The Hon'ble Supreme Court hasheld in thiscase that ifthe workınan is hired through a contractor, itwas held that master and servant relationship exists . In the present case, the drivers have been hired through a contractorbut they work under the control and supervision ofthe Executive Engineer . As such , the contract is a mere camouflage . The so called contract labour will have to be treated as employees of the principle employer who can be directedto regularise the services of the contract labour in the establishment concerned .

It was submitted from the side of the workmen applicants that in case the contractors are independent, they shall be deemed to be the employees of the management .My attention was drawn to 1957 , SCR- 153 . In 1999 - I - LLJ -320 , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that daily rated workmen of Public Sector Corporation are entitled to get equal pay with regularly appointed persons doing the work. In ATR- 1986 -SC- 76, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in view of Articles 14 and 29D of the Constitution of India, an employee discharging the duties of a permanent employee must get pay at par with the permanent employee. In 1961 (3 ) SCR ( 161 ) , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in case the workers are under thecontrol ofthe management and their work is supervised by the management, they shall not be deemed to be a contractor but they shall be considered as the employee of the management . The workmen applicants are admittedly discharging the duties of work of perennial nature . There are Motor lorries and Jeeps of the department, as such drivers are required for the same . The management deliberately has engaged the workmen applicants as contractor's man so that they could not get their services regularised . One of the workman applicant is driving the jeep ofthe Executive Engineer and the other is also driving thejeep ofthe Executive Engineer . Jeep No. CHD 3642 is drivenby Shri Vijay Singh. Dharam Pal is driving jeep No. DBG-8668 of Chandigarh Division- I. As such, two workers are driving thejeep of Executive Engineer, Division- I and Division- II. The other workman is driving Motor Lorry of CPWD Department . The CPWD is the owner of the Motor Lorryandthejeep. As such, there is permanent requirement ofdrivers . It has not been stated by the management that there isshortage of post and the post has not been created. As such , these workmen are discharging the duties of perennial nature though they have admitted that they are working through contractors on contract order. But they havedischarged the duties for almost 15 years . They have serveddepartment regularly for almost 14 to 15 years . Their whole life will be spoiled in case they are not regularised. In view of their long tenure of service , it is quite evident that they should be regularised in view of 25 ID Act. They shall be deemed to be the employees of the management as they worked entirely under the control and supervision of the management .

The Hon'ble Supreme Court has affirmed the previous decision of Hussain Bhai case 1978 (4) SCC , 257 , and IndianPetrochemicals Corporation case , 1999 ( 6) SCC- 439. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has affirmed the law laid downpreviously regarding the contract labour. In view of thisjudgment of the larger Bench and the priorjudgments oftheHon'ble Supreme Court, it becomes quite obvious that contract is a mere camouflage . The workman applicant were under the direct control , command and supervision ofthe respondents and they worked according to the directions given by them .

In view of 1999 - I -LLJ , the workman applicant do not deserve to be regularised from the date of their initial engagement as there is delay. Article 137 of LimitationAct isnot applicable in such circumstances. Still , the Hon'ble It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that it is admitted that the respondent ownsjeep and lorries, as such, they are supplying the tools to the workmanapplicant. In case, they are the owners ofjeeps and lorries, it can by no stretch of imagination believed 1694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii)] Supreme Court has reduced the back wages. In this case , there is delay and latches . As such , the workman applicant are not entitled to get back wages and to be regularised from their initial date of engagement .

Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Military Farm and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005

[No. L - 14012/38 /99 - IR(DU) ]

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING

OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT -I, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 169/99

Sh . Bishamber Ram C/ o Sh . B.R. Prabhakar , 63 -С , Kailash Nagar, Model Town , Ambala City ( Haryana) 133001 .

In view of the law cited by the workman applicant , all the three workmen deserve to be regularised . There is delay in filing ID case so they should be regularised from 1st January, 2000 with all the consequential benefits and back wages and from 1st January, 2000 , they will get emoluments of a permanent driver and all the other benefits . The law cited by the management is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case. Since the workmen are working under the control and supervision of the management and in view of their long tenure of work , they should be regularised as stated above. In 2003 -LAB - IC-2630, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down the control test according to the directions ofthe Hon'ble Supreme Court, the workmen applicants deserve to be regularised.

.Applicant

Versus

The reference is replied thus :-

1. The Director, Military Farms , Western CommandHead Quarters, (Farm Br.) Chandimandir- 134187 .

2. The Officer- in-Charge, Military Farm, Birsarangwal P.O. Jassomajra, Distt . Nawanshahar (Pb. )- 144 514 .

Respondent

REPRESENTATIVE :

Forthe workman

: Shri Dhani Ram

: Shri K.K. Thakur

For the management

The action of the management of CPWD in treating (Sh. Vijay Singh, Dharam Pal, Gita Ram Drivers ) as employee employed on work order and denying them wages of regular driver in the scale of Rs . 950-1500 and in not regularising their services is neither just nor fair. The workmen applicants deserve to be regularised from 1st January, 2000 on the scale of a permanent driver. They willget all the consequential benefits and arrears ofwages from 1st January, 2000. In case , they are not regularised on the date mentioned above within two months after publication of the award , the workmen applicants will get 12% interest per annum on their entire arrears of back wages.

AWARD

The award is given accordingly .

Passed on 16-12-2004

Dt. 17-01-2005

R.N. RAJ , PresidingOfficer

The Central Govt . Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L- 14012/38/ 99 /IR (DU) Dated 3rd August, 1999 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

"Whether the action of the Officer - in -Charge , Military Farm, Birsarangwal in terminating the services of Sh . Bishamber Ram S/ o Sh . Karma is legal and Justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled? " का.आ. 586.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मिलिट्री फार्म के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 169/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -14012/38/99- आई.आर. (डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

Announced.

16-12-2004

S.O. 586. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 169/99) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005.

का.आ. 587.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ऑल इंडिया रेडियो के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

1695 Director Office of the Chief Engineer (Trg) Staff Training InstituteAll India Radio , Kingsway Camp , Delhi -9 in case the workman accepts the offer of appointment on the above said terms and conditions . That the workman accepting the offer, reported for duty as directed on 1-1-93 .

[सं ० एल-42012/66/95- आई.आर. (डी.यू.) ]

That although the workman was taken for 89 days only initially, he was continued without break in real sense till 12-7-94 of course with only the artificial breaks of one day that too onpaper . That a number of office orders were issued every 3 months to make the records complete .

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्कअधिकारी

New Delhi, the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 587.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 11/96 ) of theCentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of All India Radio and their workman ,which was received by the Central Government on 28-1-2005

[No. L -42012/66/95 - IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, NEW DELHI R. N. RAI , PresidingOfficer

LD . No. 11/96

Inthe matter of:-

Sh. Ram Prakash,

S/o Sh . T. R. Sharma, R/o Sector V/659 , R.K. Puram, NewDelhi -22

Versus

The Director General , All India Radio , Sansad Marg, Akashwani Bhawan, NewDelhi- 1

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labourby its letter No. L -42012/66/ 95- IR(DU) Central Government dt. 5/ 10-1-1996 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of the Director GeneralAll India Radio, AkashwaniBhawan, NewDelhi in terminating the services of Sh. Ram Prakash, Hindi Typist, w.e.f. 13-7-94 isjust, fair and legal ? Ifnot, what reliefthe workman concerned is entitled?"

The claimant has filed statement of claim. In the statement of claim, it has been stated that the workman was offered a temporary post of Hindi typist on ad hoc basis for a period of 89 days in the first instance on the initial pay ofRs . 950 p.m. in the scale of pay of Rs . 950-20- 1150 -EB- 25-1500 plus dearness and other allowances admissible to the other Government Servants similarly placedand was asked to report for duty w.e.f. 1-1-93 to the The services of the workman was not continued beyond 12-7-94, even though the administrative officer as well as the Director of the Staff Training Institute have been repeatedly requesting the Regional Director, Staff Selection Committee and the Director General AIR for continuing theworkman en regular basis .

That the workman was also medically examined and his character and antecedents were also verified as is done in the case of regular employees . That in fact the management was almost certain that the workman would be continued on regular basis in view of the inordinate delay on the part of the Staff Selection Committee who were not able to nominate a candidate and despite the innumerable reminders by the management to the Staff Selection Committee in this regard.

That in the meantime the workman completed his 240 daysof attendance which is the statutory requirement of anad hoc employee for consideration for conferring regular status on an ad hoc casual category of workman.

That as the services of the workman was not continued beyond 12-7-94 , the workman represented to the management on 25-8-94 to which he did not receive anyreply.

That the ingenuity played by the management in extending the service ofthe workman after the initial period of89 days and giving him extension of further periods of 89 days every time after artificial break of one or two days does not pay its dividend as many a court have categorically stated that such artificial breaks do not count for service and the very introduction of such breaks is an unfair labour practice attracting punishment .

That it has been held by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in civil Writ petition No. 11851 of 1994 on 28-11-94 that the termination of the petitioner appointed fora fixed period in the first instance and continued with intermittent breaks thereafter and ultimate termination without any notice despite continuity of work amounts to unfair labour practice and is a violation of Section 25F of the ID Act, 1947 vide 1995 Lab . IC 2448 .

That the All India Radio is an Industry and the applicant is a workman within the meaning of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 and the termination in view of the above submission is a retrenchment filling within the definition ofthe term under the provisions of the said Act .

That the workman was within age at the time of joining the services of the management on 1-1-93 , but he is now over aged and he cannot hope to get Government service now. That the workman was given every hope that he would be regularised and the workman has enough of 1696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] proof to substantiate this and this amounts to violation of the theory of promissory estoppel .

That the management of the All India Radio is avast establishment spreading over throughout the length and breadth of the country and there is job requirement and the workmancould be accommodated without difficulty in any one of their establishment instead of throwing him out in the streets as has been done .

Thus , there has not been any illegality or arbitrariness in action on the part of the respondent. The claimant services had to be dispensed with incompliance of the respondent service rules. It is further stated that any indulgence by the Hon'ble Tribunal will be against the public policy and law pronouncedby the Hon'ble Apex Court that backdoor entry in the public employment should be avoided . It is further submitted that it is also settled law as per decisions of the Apex Court that ad- hoc and temporary appointment in violation of the service rules does not give right to the employee for regular appointment.

The management/respondent has filed WS . In the WS it has been submitted that the Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate the dispute referred to it. The dispute has wrongly been referred to it in as much as All India Radio is not an industry in terms of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947.

It is stated that the claim of the claimant is misconceived and misleading . It is wrong that the competent authority was ever certain about the continuation of the claimant against the post on regular basis or the competent authorities ever decided as such . The alleged medical examination and verification of character and antecedents was without sanction or approval of the competent authorities .

That likewise the claimant is also not workman in terms of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is stated that the claimant was Govt . servant governed under the statutory rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India .

Itispatently wrong that completion of 240 days of attendance is statutory requirement for conferring regular status to an employee . It is also wrong that the claimant wasworking as casual or daily rated workman.

That the appointment of the claimant was adhoc and stop gap arrangement pending nomination of suitable and qualified candidate for the post of typist clerk under the provisions of relevant statutory rules by the Staff Selection Commission.

The department duly represented its case and also filed reply there to the claim before the A.L.C. The A.L.C. referred the dispute without going into the merits of the case and points raised on behalf of the respondent . It is stated that the reference is bad in the eyes of law .

It iswrong that in the instant case the service of one month's notice of the respondent amounts to retrenchment intemporary service rules or terms of appointment no notice was required.

It is stated that consequent upon creation of a permanent post of Hindi Typist under the Office of the ChiefEngineer (Trg . ), Staff Training Institute (Technical ), Kingsway Camp, Delhi requisition was sent to the SSC for nominating the suitable candidate for the post of Hindi Typist against the available vacancy vide letter dated 12-3-91 of the CE (Trg.) . However, in view of the exigencies ofservice and policy of the Govt . regarding implementation ofofficial language policy, it was decided by the competent authority to fill up the post on adhoc and temporary basis through local employment exchange pending nomination of regular candidate against the post . Accordingly in the above background the claimant was appointed as Hindi Typist initially for a period of 89 days w.e.f. 1-1-93 .

It is patently wrong that at any point of time the claimant was promised or assured that he would be regularised in the service . In fact he was at the very out set appointed on temporary and ad -hoc basis in the circumstances stated herein above . It is also wrong that the principle of promissory estoppel is applicable in the instant case .

Itis further stated that the position advanced by the claimant is neither practicable nor in terms of the ratio of judicial pronouncements . Such proposition would lead to back door entries, violation of recruitment rules etc. Which cannot and must not be allowed in the smooth functioning ofthe administration .

It is denied that the service of the claimant during the period 1-1-93 to 12-7-94 was continuous or the break was artificial or on the paper. It is further wrong that the office orders were issued every 3 months to make the record complete . It is stated that the adhoc and temporary appointment of the complainant as Hindi Typist was extended during the period in good faith and in anticipation ofthe nomination of the regular candidate by the SSC and further in contingency of services and official languages policy of the Govt .

(

Theworkman applicant has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder he has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the statement of claim. It was submitted by the management that he was appointed on staff gap arrangement .His appointment was purely on ad -hocbasis . Evidence of both the parties has been taken . Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on therecord.

It is not denied that there was nothing against the work or the conduct of the claimant . It is also not denied that there was delay in nomination of suitable and regular candidate by the Staff Selection Commission despite the reminders and requests of the respondent's office concerned.

It is stated that the services of the claimant as adhoc and temporary Hindi Typist was utilized during the period pending nomination of the regular and qualified candidate against the post and on nomination of regular candidate the service of the claimant were dispensed with .

It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that the applicant has worked for 89 days from 4-1-1993 and again he was given appointment letter of 89 days from6-7-93 , and again he was given appointment letter for 89 days from 5-10-1993 . Similarly, he worked from [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1697

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

3-1-1994 for 89 days and 15-4-1994 for 89 days . So he has put in 414 days service . The break was notional. He has worked for more than 240 days so he should be regularised. The management has admitted that appointment letter on ad hoc and temporary basis was given to the workman applicant as regular selection was pending. He was appointed as no suitable was available from the SSC and letter to SSC was written on 12-3-1991 and several letters were written thereof. His appointment was subject to the availabilty of the nominee from the SSC. Since SSC delayed the matter, so the workman applicant was given appointment in view of staff gap arrangement . 1 have perused the record . The management has sent several letters to the SSC for providing regular candidate but the same has not been provided. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in AIR 1996 has held that in case the appointment is not made according to rules , the services of such employee can be terminated. It has been held in AIR 1995 / SCC- 974 thatad hoc services do not ripen into regular service . Similar view has been expressed in Punjab and Haryana High Court in 1994. Jurisdiction was also challenged but AIR is an industry in view of the judgement of the Banglore Water Supply . It carries on systematic activities and even advertisement charges are realized. In view of the decision ofthe Hon'ble Supreme Court, 1997 SCC, Page- 350 , and AIR 1996 referred to above, the workman applicant was appointed teinporarily till regular recruitment is made . As such , Section 24 (F) of the ID Act is not applicable in such circumstances . The law cited by the management is applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case and the law citedby the workman applicant are not applicable.

The reference is replied thus :-

The action of management of Director General All India Radio , Akashwani Bhawan, New Delhi in terminating the services of Sh. Ram Prakash, Hindi Typist , w.e.f. 13-7-94 is just, fair and legal . The workman applicant does not deserve to get any relief as prayed for .

The award is given accordingly.

Dt. 27-12-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 588- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मिलिट्री फार्म के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 171/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।.

[सं० एल-14012/20/ 99 - आई आर ( डी यू) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 588. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 171/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Military Farm and their workmen which 414 GI/2005-30

was received by the Central Government on 28-1-2005.

[No. L - 14012/20/99 -IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT -1 . CHANDIGARH

Case No. L.D. 171/99

Sh. Jasbir Chand C/o Sh. B.R. Prabhakar, Chairman W.C.N.F.W. Union , 63 -C, Kailash Nagar, Model Town , Anibala (Haryana) 133001

...Applicant

Versus

1. The Director, Military Farmς,

WesternCommand , Head Quarters, (Farm Br.) Chandimandir- 134 107

2. The Officer - Incharge.

Military Farm, Birsarangwal, P.O. Jassomajra,

Distt. Nawanshahar (Pb.) 144514

Respondent Representative:

For the workman

Shri Dhani Ram Shri K.K. Thakur For the management

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

The Central Govt . Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L- 14012/20/99 /IR (DU) dated 3rd August 1999, has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the Officer - in- charge , Military Farm , Birsarangwal in terminating the services of Sh . Jasbir Chand S/o Sh . Mohan Lal is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman isentitled ? "

1. On the request of both the parties case taken up in Lok Adalat for settlement/disposal . Stateinent ofA/R of workman recorded on SA. The representative of the workman made a statementto withdraw the present reference in the Lok Adalat as the case has been settled. In view of the statement of the rep. of the workman and management having no objection the reference is returned to Central Govt . as withdrawn . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Announced 16-12-2004

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

का.आ. 589.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, 1698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 121/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -42012 /10/92- आई.आर. (डी.यू.) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 589. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 121/93) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 28-1-2005 .

[No. L -42012/10/92 -IR (DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- L, CHANDIGARH

CaseNo. I.D. 121/93

Sh . Vijay Kumar C/o President,

Nangal Bhakra Mazdoor Sangh ,

Nangal Township,

Distt. Ropar (Pb ) -140 124

Applicant

Versus

ChiefEngineer,

BhakraBeas Management Board ,

Nangal Township,

Distt. Ropar (Pb. ) - 140 124

Respondent

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 590.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 141/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -42012/293/90- आई.आर. ( डी.यू.) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 590. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 141/91 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to management of BBMB and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 28-1-2005.

[No. L-42012/293/90- IR (DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- L, CHANDIGARH

CaseNo. I.D. 141/91

General Secretary,

Nangal Bhakra Mazdoor Sangh,

Nangal Township ,

Distt. Ropar(Pb. )

REPRESENTATIVE :

For the workman

Shri R. K. Singh

Shri R. C. Attri For the management

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

Applicant

Versus

ChiefEngineer,

Bhakra Dam , Nangal Township ,

Distt. Ropar (Pb .)

The Central Govt . Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L -42012/ 10/ 92 /IR (DU) dated 30th September, 1993. has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Respondent

REPRESENTATIVE :

Forthe workman

Shri R. K. Singh

Shri R. C. Attri

For the management

"Whether the action of the Chief Engineer, Bhakra Beas Management Board , Nangal Township , in terminating the service of Shri Vijay Kumar, S/o Shri Siri Ram, T. Mate w.e.f. 9-1-85 ? If not, what reliefhe is entitled to and from what date ?"

1. On the request of both the parties case taken up in Lok Adalat for settlement/disposal. Stateme of A/R of workman recorded on SA. The represerative of the workman made a statement to withdraw the present reference in the Lok Adalat as the case has been settled . In view of the statement of the rep . of the workman and management having no objection the reference is returned to Central Govt. as withdrawn. Central Govt. be informed . File be consigned to record .

Announced 16-12-2004 RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

AWARD

Passed on 16-12-2004

The Central Govt. Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L. 42012/293 /90 - IRD dated 30th September 1991. Has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:

"Whether the action of the Chief Engineer , Bhakra Dam, Nangal Township , in terminating the service of Shri Satya Prakash, S /o Shri Faquir Dass, Daily wages workman w.e.f. 12-11-86 is justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"

1. On the request of both the parties case taken up inLok Adalat for settlement/disposal . Statement of A/R of 1699 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माव 30 , 1926

"Whether the action of the management of Bhakra BeasManagement Board in denying additional 8 days leaveto the workcharged staff in parlence of regular workers is legal, proper andjustified ? Ifnot, towhat reliefthe concerned workmen are entitled to ?" workman recorded on SA. The representative of the workman made a statement to withdraw the present reference in the Lok Adalat as the case has been settled. In view of the statement of the rep . of the workman and management having no objection the reace is returnesi to Central Govt. as withdrawn . Centrai be informed Filebe consignedto record.

Announced

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

16-12-2004

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

Announced

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

16-12-2004

का.आ. 591.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 141/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005 [सं० एल-42011/ 28/92- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 28th January , 2005

का.आ. 592.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हरियाणा मिनरल लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 39/95 ) को प्रकशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-29012/ 98/94- आई.आर. (विविध) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव S. O. 591. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. 141/93 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 28-1-2005.

New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005 [No. L-42011/28/92 -IR (DU)]

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- L, CHANDIGARH

CaseNo. I.D. 141/93

S. O. 592.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 39/95) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofHaryana Minerals Ltd. and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 28-1-2005.

Sh. R. K. Singh, President,

Nangal Bhakra Mazdoor Sangh, Nangal Township, Distt. Ropar (Pb.)

[No. L-29012/98/94 - L.R. (M)] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

Applicant

Versus

ANNEXURE

ChiefEngineer,

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER :

B.B.M.B. , Nangal Township,

Distt. Ropar (Punjab)

Respondent

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT-IL, NEW DELHI

REPRESENTATIVE :

Forthe workman

Shri R. K. Singh

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI :

Shri R. C. Attri

L. D. No. 39/95

Forthe management

AWARD

In the matter of:

Passed on 16-12-2004

Sh. Dharamvir Singh

S/o Sh . Mata Deen Chaudhary , R/o -Rewari Road, Near Bus Stand, Narnaul , Distt . MohinderGarh

The Central Govt . Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L. 42011/28/ 92 /IR (D.U. ) dated 25th November 1993. Has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

(Haryana)

1700

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

TheManaging Director, Haryana Minerals Ltd. , Arunachal Building, 19, Barakhamba Road, 703-704, 7th Floor, NewDelhi - 110001 ,

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labourby its letter No. L- 29012/98/ 94- IR (Vividh) Central Government Dtd . 3/6-3-1995 has referred the following point for adjudication.

Thepoint runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management ofM/s . HaryanaMinerals Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Dharamvir Singh w.e.f. 21-12-1992 is just, fair and legal ? If not, what relief he is entitled to and from which date ?"

The workman has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim , it has been stated that the respondents made an advertisement for the selection and filing up the post ofAssistant Manager (Personal ) in Haryana Minerals Ltd.which appeared in the Hindustan Times, the daily dtd. 8-9-1990 and petitioner applied for the post in question on the basis of advertisement dtd . 8-9-1990 . It is submitted that the petitioner was called for the interview by the respondents vide their office letter dtd. 22-3-1991 and the copy of the same marked as (Annexure W- 1 ) of claim statement. It is submitted that the selection committee vide its order selected the petitioner for the post of Assistant Manager(Personal) and offer of appointment was given to the applicant vide order dtd . 1-4-1991 which is marked Annexure W-2 in which the relevant conditions was that the petitioner has to be on probation for a period of one year. The petitioner joined his duties on the basis of the selection and offer of appointment dtd. 1-4-1991 on 3-4-1991 .

It is submitted that it will be relevant to submit here that the Haryana Minerals Ltd. has got its various offices/mines spreading over in the Distt. of Gurgaon , Mahindergarh, Rewari, Bhiwani, Faridabad and Alwar, which are controlledby the respond No. 1 and therefore it canbe said that for all the mines/office are under the common employer and the Haryana Minerals Ltd. is it self is a unit for all purposes including for the purposes of retrenchment . It is submitted that the petitioner acquired the status of confirm employee and therefore is entitled for all the benefits which admissible under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

It is submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court delivered its decision in which directions were issued to the all the stone- crushers operator to shift their working to otherplace from the Delhi area and adjoining areas ofDelhi for the reason given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and on the basis of this direction, the stone crushers which were operating in these areas were ordered to be shifted and these stone-crushers were transferred to Pali and other places and not a single unit of stone- crusher was closed down.

That the management of HML vide its order dtd. 2-6-1992 laid off the petition on the false reason that all the

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] stone crushers have been closed down which is totally false as these stone crushers are still operating at various places and these stone crushers are maintaining the supply line of law material to the Government projects i.e. DDA andto the private requirement of the Society . Hence the impugned order of lay off in men a eye wash and it is based on falsehood. The copy of the impugned order dtd . 2-6-1992 are annexed as Annexure W -4 and W- 5 of this claim statement.

That the Chief Engineer HML vide its order No. HM/ E/92/2724 dtd. 21-12-1992 passed the order ofretrenchment ofthepetitioner/workman and the copy of the order stated dtd. 21-12-1992 is annexed here as Annexure W-7 and the relevant part of the order is reproduced here as under :-

"Consequent upon reduction of mining operations and production of the minerals. Your services have been found surplus in your category.

Your services are hereby retrenched with effect from 21-12-1992 .

Please collect the amount of one month's pay in lieu spay ofnotice and retrenchment compensation as admissible to you under Section 25 - F(9a) on dtd . 21-12-1972 from the cash section.

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement, it has been stated that in pursuance to the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India dtd . 15th May, 1992passed in Writ Petition (C) No. 4677/1985 titled asM.C. Mehta. Etc. -Vs. - Union of India, all the mechanical stone crushers in Faridabad/ Ballabhgarh area had to face closure with effect from 15th August 1992. Further the Hon'ble Supreme Court directed the immediate stoppage ofstone crushers in the Union Territory of Delhi/Faridabad- Ballabhgarh Complex, which had no valid licences from the appropriate authorities . Besides. the Central Pollution CentralBoardhas also stopped some other stone crushers under Section 31A of Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1981. As a result almost all the stone crushers ofthe area have been ceased to operate .

The stone produced by various mining establishments in Faridabad and Ballabhgarh area , is requied to be crushed in the stone crushers so as to make it commercially useful as road metal or building stone and make it marketable . Due to closure of stone crushers who arethe users ofthe stone produced by the mining industry of the area including the various mining establishments operatedby Haryana Minerals Ltd. suffered serious bold. Asaresult themining operations and production ofminerals ofthese establishments have suffered a crisis to causing a serious set back these mining establishments . In the circumstances the management was unable to provide employment to its workmen in the stone quarry in question. It was compelled to take appropriate legal steps for retrenchment its workmen.

Inthe aforesaid circumstances the management after going through/ complying all the provisions of law, has taken a decision for retrenchment and passed with order dtd . 21-12-1992, in consonance with the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That the retrenchment order [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

dtd. 21-12-1992, has been upheld by the Hon'ble High Court ofPunjab andHaryana in C.W.P. No. 2299 and 6331 of 1993 where theHon'ble High Court has been pleased to dismiss the sameby its order dtd. 4-2-1994.

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. Inhis rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his statement ofclaim and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most ofthe paras ofthe statement of claim.

Theworkman applicant was not present on the date ofargument . He is absent from 22-4-2003 .He did not turn updespite notice. He was not present even in the previous court.

Boththe parties have filed documents . Evidence of both the parties has been adduced.

Heard arguments from the side of the management and perused the papers on the record . The case of the workman applicant is that he was appointed by the respondents vide their office letter dtd. 22-3-1991 . The Haryana Minerals has got its various offices/ nines spreading over the district of Gurgaon, Mahendergarh, Faridabad and Alwar. In view of the directions of the Hon'bleHigh Court, stone arushers were shifted from Delhi area and rejoining Delhi area for the reasons givenby the Hon'ble Supreme Court and on the basis ofthis direction, the stone crushers which were operating in these areas were ordered to be shifted and it was transferred to Pali and other places and not a single unit was closed down. The management on the false reason passed order of retrenchment ofthe petitioner w.e.f. 21-12-1992 and directed to collect one month's pay in view of notice and retrenchment compensation from the cash section. It was submitted that no units were closed and retrenchment order waspassed in order to deprive the workman of his legitimate right.

1701

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माध 30, 1926

ofmechanical stone crushing activities and ordered to set upa new stone crushing zone . The workman applicant was retrenched as some of the units were naturally bound tobe closed.Therespondents/ management were compelled to closetheirunits. The workmen applicant has not made out hiscase. The Haryana Minerals Ltd. has been closed now.

Thereference is replied thus:

The action of the management of M/s Haryana Minerals Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Dharamvir Singh w.e.f. 21-12-1992 isjust, fair and legal . The workman is not entitled to any relief as prayed for.

Dtd. 18-1-2005

R. N. RAI, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 593.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ओ.एम.जी.सी. के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 253/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं० एल-30025/26/ 2005- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव NewDelhi, the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 593 ,-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 253/04) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s O.N.G.C. and their workmen which was receivedby the Central Govemment on 28-1-2005.

[No. L-30025/26/2005-1.R. (M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURTAT AHMEDABAD PRESENT: SHRI B. I. KAZI B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer

Com. C.G.LT.A. No. 253/04 in Reference No. C.G.LT.A. No. 215/04

(OldCom. No. 207/03 in Ref. (LT.C.) No. 139/99) ShuklaBrijeshkumar Hariparakash,

Block No. 398/22334 , Shivashaktinagar, Chandkheda, Gandhinagar

....Complainant

Versus

GroupGeneralManager,

ONGC, AhmedabadProject,

Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad

It was submitted from the side of the respondent/ management that on 15th of May, 1992 , in M.C. Mehta versusUnion of India, the Hon'ble High Court directedthe immediate stoppage of stone crushers in the Union Territory of Delhi , Faridabad and Ballabhgarh Complex which had no valid licence . As such, the units were closed. The Central Pollution Board has also stopped some stone crushers. As such, the Haryana Minerals suffered a heavy set back and the workmen were retrenched. They have been given one month's salary in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation, as such, Section 25 -F ofthe I.D. Act is not attracted. I have perused the record. Retrenchment has been given to the workman applicant and he has been given one month notice. The mines were closed inview ofthe order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1992 (3 ) SCC . I have perused the citations referred to above and the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that stone crushersare causing environmental pollution. Every citizen has a right to fresh air and to live in pollution free environment.

In view of the declaration of the WHO , Delhi has became the most grubbiest polluted and unhealthy city. TheHon'ble Supreme Court issued directions for stoppage

....Opponent Appearances:

Complainant: Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Shri K. V. Gadhia

Opponent :

1702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] ORDER

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

का.आ. 594.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 252/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-30025/25/2005- आई.आर. ( विविध) ] वी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

2. The brief facts of the complainants is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services ofcomplainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint. ByEx. 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status-quo .

S. 0.594 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 252/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between employers in relation to the management of M/s O.N.G.C. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005

[No. L -30025/25 /2005 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy,

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement byEx. 10. Thebrief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concernedworkmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable. Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

Shri B. I. Kazi, B. Sc . , L.L.M. , PresidingOfficer Com. C. G. I. Τ. Α. No. 252/04 In Reference No. C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04 (OldCom. No. 206/03 In Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ) ...Complainant 4. During the course of proceedings the complainant has submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in viewoforder passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint isbecome infructuous . The complaint may bedisposed off accordingly.

Thakor Javanji Mathurji, Dantali, Dist: G'nagar.

Versus

...Opponent 5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.Α No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal ofthat reference.

GroupGeneral Manager, ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad.

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed anybreach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 ( A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence 1 pass the following order:

ORDER

Inview of Ex. 11 the complaint is herebydisposed of. No order as to cost . Ahmedabad

B. I. KAZI, PresidingOfficer

Date: 25-10-2004

1. The Complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainantand for other relief.

1703

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माष 30, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D. B. G. Department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99. He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O. N. G. C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act ofthe opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hencehe prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint. ByEx. 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status-quo.

3.Theopponenthas submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4.Duringthe course of proceedings the complainant hadsubmittedEx. 11 and it was submitted that in view oforder passed inMain Reference, i.e. reference C. G. L. T. A. No. 215/ 04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint has become infructuous. The complaint may be disposed ofaccordingly.

5.Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.Α. No. 215/04 as per Ex.46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change inthe service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal ofthat reference.

6.Thus itis clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and lookingto thefacts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent.Hence thus complaint does not survive in law.. Hence I pass the following order:

ORDER

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost . Ahmedabad. Date: 25-10-04 B.I. KAZI , PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 595.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 251/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-30025/24/2005-आई.आर. (विविध) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 595.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 251/ 2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to management ofM/ sO. N. G. C. and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 28-01-2005.

[No. L-30025/24/2005-IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURTAT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. KAZI, B. Sc. , L.L.M , PresidingOfficer Com. C. G. I. T. A No. 251/04 In Reference No. C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04 (OldCom. No. 205/03 In Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99)

...Complainant Thakor Dinesh Chanduji, Dantali,

Dist:G'nagar.

Versus

...Opponent GroupGeneral Manager, ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad.

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Opponent Shri Hemal K. Acharya : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The Complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is inviolation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainantand for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D. B. G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99. He is doing the permanent work. He isdenied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O. N. G. C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal. Before terminating the services thepermission ofthe Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status -quo.

3.Theopponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no 1704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

Shri B. I. KAZI , B. Sc. , L.L.M. , PresidingOfficer

Com . C. G. I. T. A No. 250/04 in Reference No. C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04

(OldCom. No. 204/03 In Ref. (I.T.C.) No. 139/99) 4.Duringthe course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed inMain Reference, i . e. reference C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ), the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly.

Thakor Gandaji Shanaji

...Complainant

Dantali, Distt:G'nagar.

Versus

...Opponent 5.Lookingto the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change inthe service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

GroupGeneral Manager, ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad.

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

6.Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law. Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad .

Date: 25-10-04

1. The Complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

B.I. KAZI , PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 596.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै० ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 250/ 2004) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -30025/23/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध) ]

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D. B. G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O. N. G. C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services thepermission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status - quo .

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi, the 28th January, 2005

3. The opponent has submitted the Written State- ment by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable. It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .

S. O. 596. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 250/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . O.N.G.C. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005 .

[No. L-30025/23/2005- IR(M)]

4.During the course ofproceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i . e. reference C. G. I. T. A. B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1705

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19 , 2005/माघ 30, 1926

No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.

5.Lookingto the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.Α. No. 215/04 as per Ex.46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law. Hence I pass the following order:

ORDER

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad.

Dated: 25-10-2004

B.I. KAZI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 597.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै ० ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 249, 2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-30025/22/2005 - आई. आर. ( विविध) ]

बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th January , 2005

S.O. 597.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ; the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 249/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s. O. N. G. C. and their workmen, received by the Central Goverrument on 28-01-2005.

[No. L -30025/22/2005 - IR(M) ]

B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

SHRI B. I. KAZI B. SC. , L.L.M. , PresidingOfficer Com. C. G. I. T. A No. 249/04 In Reference No. C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04

(OldCom . No. 203/03 In Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99) 414 G1 /2005-31

...Complainant Punjaji Dhu daji Thakor

101 Kakivalo vas, Chandkheda, Dist :G'nagar.

Versus

...Opponent GroupGeneral Manager ,

ONGC, Ahmedabad Project,

Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad .

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

2.The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D. B. G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99. He is doing the permanentwork. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O. N. G. C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent beingimproper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary .Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status-quo .

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable. It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable. Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4.During the course ofproceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference, i.e. reference C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04 (OLD No. 139/99 ), the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.

5.Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change inthe service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference.

6.Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation 1706

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/ MAGHA 30 , 1926

of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence Ipass the following order :

ORDER

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad.

Date: 25-10-2004

B.I. KAZI, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

का.आ. 598.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ओ . एन . जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 248/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-30025/ 21/2005 - आई. आर. ( विविध) ] बी. एम . डेविड, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 598. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 248/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . O. N. G. C. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005

[No. L-30025/21 /2005- IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT ATAHMEDABAD

PRESENT:

SHRI B. I. KAZI , B. Sc . , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com. C. G. L T. A No. 248/04 In Reference No. C. G. LT. A. No. 215/04

(Old Com. No. 202/03 In Ref. (LT.C. ) No. 139/99)

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

ORDER

2.The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D. B. G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O. N. G. C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intendiug to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent beingimproper and illegal. Before terminating the services thepermission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hencethis complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .

4.During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference , i . e. reference C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99), the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.Α. No. 215/04 as per Ex.46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal ofthat reference.

...Complainant

Thakor AskojiManaji

Dantali,

Dist:G'nagar.

Versus

6.Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed anybreach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , and looking to the facts ofthe complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order:

ORDER

...Opponent

GroupGeneral Manager,

ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad .

APPEARANCES:

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

Inview of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad.

Date: 25-10-2004

B.1. KAZI , Presiding Officer 1707

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 599.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 298/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं० एल-30012 /2/ 2000- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 599. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 298/ 2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s ONGC and their workmen, which wasreceivedby the Central Govemment on 28-01-2005

[No.L -30012/2/2000 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURTAT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

SHRI B. I. KAZI B. Sc. , L.L.M. , PresidingOfficer Industrial Dispute No. 298/04 (Old ITC No. 55/2000 Transferred from LT. Ahmedabad) (a) The Regional Director, ONGC Ltd. WRBC, Makarpura Road, Baroda.

(b) The Group General Manager (Project) ONGCLtd. , Mehsana Project, KDM Palavasna Mehsana (Gujarat)

Mehsana Project to Jodhpur Project in November 1998 was need based or under organization requirement or under the transfer policy prevailing in ONGC Ltd. , Mehsana Project ? If not , to what reliefthe concerned employees is entitled ? " 2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 7-7-2000. The date to file the statement of claim was 10-08-2000. The appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim with relevant documents and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within 15 days of the receipt of the order.

3. However, proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party . Thesecond party is failed to submit a statement of claim after4½ years from the date of reference . Thus this tribunal has reason tobelieve that the second party is not interested in the dispute. Thus the second party has not satisfactorily justified his demand regarding transfer from Mehsana to Jodhpur. Looking to this fact it is to be held that the order ofthe firstparty is found to be legal anci valid.

Looking to the above observation I hereby pass the following order:

ORDER

The action of the management ONGC Mehsana in affecting the transfer of Shri K.. V. D. Sati Mehsana to Jodhpur in November , 1998 is need based or under organization requirement or under the transfer policy prevailing ONGC Mehsana . The workman is not entitled to any relief. Hencethe reference is rejected. No order asto cost .

Ahmedabad Date : 11-10-04

B.I. KAZI , PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

...FirstParty

Versus

United Bank of India Sramik Karmachri Samity C/o . UnitedBank of India , ElectricityHouse Branch, Bhadra, Ahmedabad-3800 01 .

का.आ. 600.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पो. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 300/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं० एल-30012/5/2000- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ]

SecondParty

APPEARANCES : FirstParty : Shri C. S. Naidu, Shri P. F. Jhaveri SecondParty : Absent

AWARD

1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by order No. L-30012/ 2/2000 - IR (M) , dated 19-05-2000 to this Tribunal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Mehsana Project in effecting transfer of Shri K. V. D. Sati , Secretary , ONGC Mazdoor Sangh from

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 28th January , 2005

S.O. 600.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 300/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2005

[No. L-30012/5 /2000 -IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

1708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19 , 2005/MAGHA 30, 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

SHRI B. I. KAZIB. SC. , L.L.M. , PresidingOfficer Industrial Dispute No. 300/04

(Old ITC No. 57/2000 Transferred from LT. Ahmedabad) Dy. General Manager (Personnel )

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Looking to the above observation 1 hereby pass the followingorder:

ORDER

The action of the first party in terminating (disengagement) of Shri Gunvantbhai Ranjitbhai Parmar w.e.f. 1-3-98 is legal and just and second party has not established that he is workman under section 2(s ) of the I.D. Act . Hence the reference is rejected . No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad

Dated: 11-10-2004

Western Region, 1st Floor, Golden Triangle , Nr. Sardar Patel Stadium Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) ...FirstParty V/s.

The General Secretary, Bright Mazdoor Union , 3,Annanagar, Kabir Chowk, Sabarmati , Ahmedabad . ...SecondParty APPEARANCES :

: Shri D. C. Gandhi

FirstParty

SecondParty : Absent

AWARD

1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by Order No. L -30012/5/2000- IR (M) dated 26-5-2000 to this Tribunal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under :

SCHEDULE

"Whether Shri Gunvantbhai Ranjitbhai Parmar engaged by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Ahmedabad, w.e.f. 1-8-1994 to 1-3-1998 to carry out "Marfatia " service is a workman as defined under Section2(s) of the I. D. Act, 1947 ? If so whether his termination disengagement w.e.f. 1-3-1998 without observing the provisions of Section 25 F, G. & H , is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the concerned is entitled ?"

2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 7-7-2000 . The date to file the statement of claim was 10-8-2004. The appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim with relevant documents and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within 15 days ofthe receipt of the order.

3. However, proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party. The second party failed to submit a statement of claim aſter 4½ years from the date of reference . Thus this tribunal has reason to believe that the second party is not interested in the dispute . Thus the second party has not established that the termination w.e.f. 1-3-98 is without observing the provisions of Section 25 F, G & H. Not only that the second partyhas failed to establish the fact that he is the workman under section 2 (s) of the I.D. Act . Looking to this fact this Tribunal hold that the order of the first party terminating/ disengaging the service of the workman w.e.f. 1-3-98 is just and legal.

B.I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 601.-औद्योगिक विषाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 241/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-30025/14/2005 - आई.आर. ( विविध) ] बी. एम . डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 601.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 241/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . ONGC and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 28-1-2005 .

[No. L - 30025/ 14/2005 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

SHRI B. I. KAZI B. Sc. , L.L..M. , Presiding Officer

) Com. G.G.LT.A. No. 241/04 In Reference No. C.G.LT.A. No. 215/04 (Old Com . No. 195/03 In Ref. (L.T.C. ) No. 139/99)

Parmar Dipak Ishwarbhai ,

Gorakumbhar's Chawl , Rampair'sTekro , Ahmedabad

...Complainant V/s.

GroupGeneral Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad . ...Opponent [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that theact ofthe opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainantand for other relief.

2.The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. Department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanentwork. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the ONGC. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent beingimproper and illegal. Before terminating the services thepermission ofthe Tribunal is necessary, Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint. By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial DisputeAct and hence this complaint is not maintainable. It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed withcost.

4.During the course ofproceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference, i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99), the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change inthe service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal ofthat reference.

6.Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed anybreach of Section 33A of the Industrial DisputesAct and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not servive in law. Hence I pass the following order:

ORDER

In view ofEx. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad

Dated: 25-10-2004

B.I. KAZI , PresidingOfficer 414 GI/2005-32

1709

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/माथ 30 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

का.आ. 602.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 242/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-30025/15/2005- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव NewDelhi, the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 602. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 242/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothemanagement of M/s. ONGC and their workmen, which wasreceivedby the Central Government on 28-1-2005.

[No.L-30025/15/2005-IR(M)] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURTAT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT:

SHRI B. I. KAZI B. SC. , L.L.M. , PresidingOfficer Com. G.G.LT.A No. 242/04 In Reference No. C.G.LT.A. No. 215/04 (Old Com. No. 196/03 In Ref. (LT.C.) No. 139/99)

Nr.Visat Mataji's Temple,

Vagheshwari Ranchhodbhai Ambalal, Chandkheda,

...Complainant Dist:G'nagar.

V/s.

GroupGeneralManager,

ONGC, Ahmedabad Project,

Opponent

Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad.

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

: Shri K. V. Gadhia

Opponent

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, praying that theact ofthe opponent changing his service conditions is inviolation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

1 1710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

permanent employee of the ONGC. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal. Before terminating the services thepermission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and Tribunal has granted the status -quo .

3. The opponent has submitted the written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submited that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4.Duringthe course ofproceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference, i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99), the present complaint is become infructuous. The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.LT.Α. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal ofthat reference.

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not servive in law. Hence I pass the following order:

ORDER

In view of Ex . 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Dated: 25-10-04

B.I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2005

का.आ. 603.- औद्योगिक3. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 243/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-1-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं० एल-30025/16/2005 - आई.आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S. O. 603. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 243/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] to the management of M/s . O.N.G.C. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government d'i 28-1-2005.

[No. L-30025/16/2005 -IR(M)] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

SHRI B. I. KAZIB. SC. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com. C.G.LT.A No. 243/04 In Reference No. C.G.LT.A. No. 215/04

(Old Com. No. 197/03 In Ref. (LT.C. ) No. 139/99)

...Complainant Rathod Kantibhai Valjibhai . 4/12Madhupur Police line, Shahibug, Ahmedabad

V/s. GroupGeneralManager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad.

...Opponent APPEARANCES :

Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Complainant :

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the ONGC . The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint. By Ex. 2 the complainant has filedand ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statementby Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .

1711 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19, 2005/माघ 30, 1926

Industrial Dispute No. 766/04

(Old ITC No. 15/2002 Transferred from LT. Ahmedabad)

NewPali HillQuarry,

TheManager,Timba Tal , Godhra, District: Panchmahal (Gujarat) Pahchmahal.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference, i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint isbecom infructuous . The complaint may Misposed off. accordingly.

...FirstParty

V/s.

TheGeneral Secretary,

Gujarat Rajya Quarry Quarry Kamdar,

Majoor Sevalaya Bhadra, Ahmedabad- 380001

...SecondParty 5.Lookingto the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.Α. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change inthe service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

APPEARANCES :

: (Absent)

FirstParty

(Absent)

SecondParty :

AWARD

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act, and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not servive in law . Hence 1 pass the following order:

1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by order No. L- 29011/ 71/2001 dated 27-11-2001 to this Tribunal for adjudication. The terms of reference is as under:

ORDER

SCHEDULE

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Date: 25-10-2004

B.1. KAZI, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

"Whether the action of the management of New Pali HillQuarry. , Timba Tal , Godhra Dt. Panchmahal in terminating the service of Shri Meganbhai Natubhai , Shri Chmanbhai Ratabhai , Shri Chmanbhai Shalambhai , Shri Mahesh Ratansmgh and Shri Takar Bhanjibhai, Drivers w.e.f. 1-7-1999 is legal and justified? Ifnot, then to what reliefthe workmen are entitled to and from which date ? "

का. आ. 604. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार न्यूपाली हिल क्वारीके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 766/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केंन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. The secondparty was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 30-8-02. The dateto file the statement of claim was 7-10-02 . The appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim with relevant documents and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within 15 days of the receipt of the order.

[सं० एल-29011 /71/2001- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 28th January , 2005

3. However , proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party. The second party failed to submit a statement of claim after 3 years from the date of reference . Thus this tribunal has reason to believe that, the second party is not interested in the dispute. The second party has not satisfactorily proved that the termination of Shri Meganbhai Natubhai , Shri Chmanbhai Ratabhai , Shri Chmanbhai Shalambhai , Shri Mahesh Ratansmgh and Shri Takar Bhanjibhai , Drivers w.e.f. 1-7-1999 is illegal and unjust. Thus the workmen are not entitled to any relief in the reference . Hence 1 pass the following order.

ORDER

S. O. 604. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 766/04 ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of New Pali Hill Quary , and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on28-01-2005.

[No. L- 29011 /71/2001 -IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

The action of the management in terminating the services of Shri Meganbhai Natubhai , Ratabhai , Shri Chmanbhai Ratabhai, Shri Chmanbhai Shalambhai , Mahesh Ratansmgh and Shri Takar Bhanjibhai , Drivers w.e.f. 1-7-1999 is not illegal and unjust . The workmen are not entitled to any relief. The reference is hereby rejected. No order as to cost .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURTAT AHMEDABAD

Ahmedabad

PRESENT :

Date: 12-10-04

SHRI B. I. KAZI B. SC. , L.L.M. , PresidingOfficer

B. I. KAZI, PreOnce 1712

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी , 2005

का. आ. 605.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हरियाणा मिनरल्स लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विषाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 89/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं० एल-29012/41/ 95- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th January, 2005

S.O. 605. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 89/95) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Haryana Minerals Ltd. , and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on28-01-2005.

[No. L -29012/41/95 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER :

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI R. N. RAI . , Presiding Officer

I. D. No. 89/95

IN THE MATTER OF :-

Sh . Bijender Singh S/o Sh. Sunpat Ram, Vill. Supalas , P.O. Palaha,

(Distt. Bharatpur) Rajasthan.

VERSUS

TheManager,

HaryanaMinerals Ltd. ,

MewlaMaharajpur ,

(Faridabad) Haryana .

AWARD

TheMinisrty of Labour by its letter No. L - 29012/41/ 95- IR (M) Central Government dt . 25-08-1995 has referred the following point for adjudication .

point runs as hereunder :-

mether the action of the management of M/s . Haryana Minerals Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Bijender Singh w.e.f. 21-12-1992 is justified? If not , what reliefhe is entitled and from which date? "

The workman has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman was appointed substantively on the permanently clear vacant post ofChowkidar on and w.e.f. 01-10-1990 and he was posted at their Mewla Maharajpur Stone Mines . That though the workman was substantively appointed on the permanently clearvacant post, the management, exploitatively shown on records as a daily rated worker, in that, his wages were being paidmonthly and kept him as such for more than two years

[PART II- SEC. 3( ii )] continuously with the oblique motivation of depriving the workman of the status and privileges , in that, the management isguilty of " GROSS UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICES' as defined in item No. 10 of the Fifth Schedule Part - I of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .

> That in view ofthe Law envisaged by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of " Surinder Singh &Another Vs. The Engineer - in- Chief & Others : 1986 (52) FLR 216 " and in a catena of its decisions, the workman is entitled to be deemed as confirmed regular employee of the management after completion of six month's continuous service under the management i.e. with effect from 01-04-1991 and to get the same wages as were being paid to his counterparts in regular employment . That the management laid off 55 employees of different categories , in that , 23 of workman's category i . e . Security Guards' with effect from 27-05-1992 vide Notice of Lay Offdt . 26-05-1992 wherein workman's name did not appear, in that, thejuniors were laid off.

Thatworkman's services were retrenched abruptly w.e.f. 21-12-1992 vide Retrenchment Order No HM/E/ 92/ MM/212 dt . 21-12-1992 on the fake and engineered ground offinding the workman's services surplus in his category due to ' reduction of mining operations and production of minerals' without complying with the mandatory pre- requisites of Section 25 - F practically and factually, though onpaper in the said retrenchment order one month's pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation was offered to be collected from the cash section; but it was not paid, in that, there is an obvious glaring violation of Section 25-F of the I.D. Act , 1947 consequent whereupon the workman is entitled to a declaration for continuation in service with full back wages because such action of the management is 'ab initio ' void and 'non est ' in the eyes of law hence inoperative .

Thatthe plea of the management of reduction in the volume ofwork is belied by its own policies and actions in starting a new Stone Mine at Pali (Faridabad ) after laying off 61 employees and subsequently terminating/ retrenching their services , in that , obviously the volume of the work with/under the management has been increased . That the management has not followed the well settled andwell established principle of " Last Come First Go " and had laid off and retrenched employees irrespective of seniority and/ or juniority and without supplying the seniority list to the workman on his demand , in that, the management has violated the mandatory prvisions of Section 25 -F of the I.D. Act , 1947 in laying off and retrenching workman's services and retaining the juniors in service, consequent whereupon such action of the management is 'ab initio' void and 'non est ' in the eyes of lay hence inoperative and the workman is entitled to a declaration for continuation in service with full back wages on this count too .

Thatafter retrenching the services of the workman onand w.e.f. 21-12-1992, the management had picked and chose eight persons of workman's category ' Security Guard' out of the 55 employees laid off w.e.f. 27-05-1992 , who were junior to the workman , in that , besides the obvious violation of Section 25 -G the management had

۲۰۰ 1713

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 19/ 2005 /मात्र 30 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

complianceofsection 25-(F) , Chapter V-A ofthe Industrial Disputes Act 1947 , after going through all the requirements ascontemplated therein. The provisions of Section 25 (N) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act were not attracted at all.

also violated the mandatory provisions of Section 25 -H of the I.D. Act, 1947 by not affording any opportunity and offering employment to the workman who was/is seniorto all the eight employees whose names are givenhereunder with their Sl. No. , in the Notice of Lay Offdt. 26-05-1992.

SecurityGuard

Sl . No.: 35 Sh. Ragveer

SecurityGuard

Sl. No.: 38 Sh. Inder Singh

SecurityGuard

Sl. No.: 40 Sh. Chhajju Ram

SecurityGuard

Sl . No .: 41 Sh . GangaDutt

Sl. No .: 43 Sh . LalaRam

SecurityGuard

Sl. No .: 45 Sh. Veer Chand SecurityGuard

Sl . No .: 48 Sh . Ashok Kumar SecurityGuard

Sl. No. : 54 Sh. Hoshiyar Singh SecurityGuard

That the order of retrenchmentdt. 21-12-1992, isjust legal and valid as the same have been passed in compliance withtheprovisions of chapter V-A ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 25 (F) has completely been followed. Pay inlieuofone month's notice and retrenchment compensation hasbeen paidtothe workman. Notice has also been givenin compliancewithSection 25 (F)C. That the retrenchment order dt. 21-12-1992 has been upheldby the Hon'ble High Court ofPunjab andHaryana in C. W.P. No. 2299 and 6331 of1993; where the Hon'ble Court has been pleased to dismiss the sameby its order dt. 04-02-1994.

and who were given employment under the management at the Stone Mines .

Thatconsequently it is quite clear that the action of the management of M/ s. Haryana Minerals Ltd. in terminating/retrenching the services of the workman Shri Bijender Singh w.e.f. 21-12-1992 is illegal and notjustified and the workman is entitled to the following reliefs:

That the claimant/ workman is doing service after retrenchment from the respondent establishment and is gainfully employed . That the claim is bad for non -joinder ofnecessaryparties and misjoinder ofparties . The almost entire area ofMewla Maharajpur Mining lease has gone to theprivate mine owners and the Haryana Minerals Ltd. is not having the Mining lease for the said area.

(a) As a consequtent of retrenchment ofworkman's services without factully complying with the mandatory prerequisities of Section 25 -F, the action of the management is 'ab initio' void and non-est inthe eyes of Law, and the workman is entitled to a declaration for continuation in service with full back wages , quite independent of any other violation;

(b) As a consequent of retrenchment ofworkman's services without following the procedure for retrenchment as defined under Section 25 -G of theAct and glaringly in departure from the 'Last ComeFirstGo' rule, the action of the management is 'ab initio ' void and 'non est ' in the eyes of Law, hence inoperative and the workman is entitled to a declaration for continuation in servicewith full back wages on this count alone and quite independent ofthe violation ofSection 25-F or any other Section:

Theworkman/claimant was engaged as Semi -Skilled workman on daily wage rate basis to be paid in accordance with the Notification of the Central Government , Ministry ofLabour. There was no vacant post as alleged. The rate of wage prescribed by the Central Government for mining workmanhas been enhanced from time to time on revision ofthe same by the Central Government . The workman was paid/provided with all statutory obligations as provided, under Industrial Law applicable to a mining workman working on daily wages under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is specifically denied that answering management has ever adopted unfair labour practice in case of the claimant workman. It is further specifically submitted that the workman was employed as semi - skilled workman categoryas notified by the Central Government for a mining establishment. It is denied that he had ever gained the 'status of a confirmed and regular employee at the mining establishment ofthe answering management.

(c) As a consequent of re -employing eight laid off juniors in workman's category of ' Security Guard' without affording opportunity to the retrenched workman and offering employment to hini, thus contravening the mandatory provisions of Section 25 -H of the I.D. Act, 1947, the said action of the management is 'ab initio' void and non est in the eyes of Law and the workman is entitled to be reinstated on his original post of Security Guard from where he was first laid of w.e.f. 07-10-1992 and subsequently retrenched w.e.f. 21-12-1992 with full backwages .

Whenthe volume of work further reduced, the lay off đt : 03-10-1992 was implemented with effect from 07-10-1992wherein the claimant workman was laid off. The lay offorder dt. 03-10-1992 was fullyjustified under the provisions ofIndustrial Dispute Act, 1947. It is specifically denied that any contractors labour was maintained by the answering management for doing the same work which was being done bythe laid offworkman . The services of the workman have beenretrenched after compliance ofprovisions of Section 25 (F) ofL D. Act, 1947. The workman has been paid retrenchment compensationand one month pay in lieu of notice periodvide order dt. HM/E/92/MM/212 dt . 21-12-1992 while retrenching hisservices. Therefore , the contention of the workman to the effect that he has not been paid retrenchment compensation as required under the provisions of Section 25 (F) is totally wrong and against the facts and as such the order dt. 21-12- 1992isjust legal andvalid.

The management has filed written statement . Inthe written statement, it has been stated that the mines situated atMewla Maharajpur is not an Industrial establishment or undertaking as contemplated in the Industrial disputeAct, 1947. It is separate and distinct establishment or undertaking. It has less than 100 (One hundred) workmen. The services of the workman have been retrenched in

Itisonly an imagination of the claimant that opening ofany new mine with its existing man force by the company had any relevance to the retrenchment process and had 1714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 19, 2005 /MAGHA 30, 1926

violated the provision of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The answering management while effecting the.

retrenchment at the mining establishment whereby the services of the claimant have been retrenched, has observed theprinciple of last come first go and has not violated the mandatory provision of Section 25 (G) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is further submitted that a list of order of seniority was prepared and published for information of all the workmen effected by the process of retrenchment . In view of the submission above , the retrenchment order dt. 21-12-1992 is fullyjustified andlegal and no mandatory provision of law has been violated and thus the claimant is not entitled to a declaration for continuation in service with full back wages on this account.

Nojuniorperson to the claimant has been retained in the employment of the answering management and as such no violation of Section 25 -G as well as Section 25 -H ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has been violated . The submission of the calimant in respect of the workman shown in the para No. 10 to the effect that they werejunior to the claimant is totally misleading, misconceived and contrary to the order of seniority as already had been published. It is further submitted that the seniority list which was published by the answering management before effecting the order of retrenchment had not been objected to at any stage by the claimant workman Shri Bijender Singh.

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his claim and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The respondent/management has also denied most of the paras ofthe statement of claim. Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heardarguments from the side of the management. The workman applicant is absenting since 03-07-2003 . despite knowledge . The workman was present in this court on 4th of August, 2004. Written argument has been filed from the side of the workman applicant. No oral document was advanced as the workman was absent . Perused the written argument of the workman applicant and heard the counsel of the management/respondent. The workman applicant has claimed regularisation on the basis of sections 25 -G and H of the ID Act . It has been mentioned inthe argument that juniors to the workman applicant have been re - appointed whereas he was retrenched on 21-12-1992. The workman applicant was appointed as Chowkidar w.e.f. 01-10-1990 and he has worked upto 20-12-1992. From perusal of the retrenchment letter, it transpires that the workman applicant was directed to take retrechment compensation . As such , retrenchment compensation has been offered to him . He was retrenched ontheground that there was surplus staff along with him due to the closure of the Mines, several other employees have been retrenched alongwith him .

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] to himhas been re -employed. Security guards are required for security arrangements and affidavit has been filed from the side of the management that the unit has been closed and it is no longer in operation.As such, all the workmen havebeen laid off. There is no counter affidavit against the affidavit of Shri Surender Kumar Jain, Inspector Industries soit becomes obvious that the Haryana Minerals has been closedand that is the reason that workman applicant had been retrenched as surplus staff. The aforsaid mine was closed in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Courtdt. 15-5-1992 in M. C. Mehta case . As a result ofthe judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court the Mining establishment of the management declined sharply leading to the closure of mines from time to time . No junior has been appointed according to the list submitted by the management.

Section 25 -F of the ID Act is not attracted as the workman applicant has been offered retrenchment compensationand he has been directed to collect cash from the cash section. As such , the requirement of the Sections 25(oo) and 25(bb) and 25 -G and H have been complied with. Section 25 -F is not attracted . The workman applicant has notbeen able to establish that any class -IV employees other the security guards junior to him have been re -employed . The workman applicant has not succeeded in making out his case. The retrenchment is valid, as retrenchment compensation has been offered to him.

The reference is replied thus:-

The action of the management of M/s. Haryana Minerals Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Bijender Singh w.e.f. 21-12-1992 isjustified. The workman applicant isnot entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The award is given accordingly.

Dt. 13-1-05

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 606.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 15 फरवरी , 2005 को उस तारीख केरूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4(44 व45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी हैं ] के उपबन्ध हरियाणा राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:-

जिला

हदबस्त

क्रम राजस्व ग्राम

संख्या

सं. का नाम

4 2

161

खैरकी दौला

गुड़गाँव 2. सीही

108

गुड़गाँव

109

गुड़गाँव सिकन्दूरपुर

It has been written in the written arguments that juniors to the workman applicant have been appointed. It transpires from the perusal of the record that some security guards have been taken into service . The may be junior to him but the workman applicant was appointed as a chowkidar. He was not appointed as security guard. The security guards come under a different category. It has nowhere been mentioned that any chowkidar or peonjunior

गुड़गाँव सिखोपुर ( रामपुर सहित ) 160

157

गुड़गाँव नवरंगपुर

154

मानेसर

गुड़गाँव भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 19 , 2005/ माष 30, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4 1

111

7. नाहरपुर कासन

गुड़गाँव

112

8. फतेहपुर नवादा

गुड़गाँव बिनौला

147

गुड़गाँव

110

10. नखरौला

गुड़गाँव कासन

11.

129

गुड़गाँव

[संख्या एस-38013 /93/2004 - एस.एस. - 1 ]

के० सी० बैन, निदेशक MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 4th February, 2005

S. O. 606. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 15th Febrauary , 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and ChapterVand VI (except Sub-section (i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofHaryana namely :

District

HadBast No.

SI. No.

Name of the RevenueVillage

161

1. Kherki Daula

Gurgaon 2. Sihi

108

Gurgaon 3.

109

Sikandarpur

Gurgaon 4.

160

Sikhopur

Gurgaon (including Rampura)

157

5. NavrangPur

Gurgaon 6

154

Manesar

Gurgaon Nahar Pur Kasan

111

Gurgaon 8

112

Gurgaon Fatehpur Nawada

147

Binola

Gurgaon 10.

110

Nakhrola

Gurgaon Kasan

129

11.

Gurgaon

[No. S- 38013 /93 /2004- S. S.-]

K. C. JAIN, Director नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 607.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा 15 फरवरी , 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी हैं ] के उपबन्ध हरियाणा राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: -

"जिला सोनीपत में राजस्व ग्राम-जहारी , हदबस्त संख्या-172 । "

[संख्या एस-38013/3/2005 -एस.एस.- 1 ]

के० सी० जैन, निदेशक

1715 NewDelhi, the4th February, 2005

S. O. 607.- In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 15th February, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter V and VI ( except Sub-section (i) ofSection 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Haryana namely:

"Revenue village Jahari, Had Bast No. 172 in District ofSonepat."

[No. S-38013/3 /2005-S.S. - IJ K. C. JAIN , Director नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 608.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( द) के उप -खण्ड ( vi ) केउपबंधोंके अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1951 दिनांक 28-7-2004 द्वारा भारत सरकार टकसाल, कोलकाता, मुम्बई, नोएडा, चेरलापल्ली ( रंगारेड्‌डी ) एवं हैदराबाद जोकि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 को 14) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि( ii ) में शामिल हैं , को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 19-8-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है;

अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 19-2-2005 से छः मास की कालावधिके लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[फा. सं . एस -11017/ 2/ 2002 - आई . आर. ( पी.एल. ) ] जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005

S.O.608. Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest required that in pursuance of the provisions of Sub- clause (vi ) of the clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14) of 1947) , declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour No. S.O. 1951 dated 28-7-2004 the service in India GovernmentMints , Kolkata/Noida/Mumbai/Hyderabad/ Cherlapalli (Ranga Reddy) which is covered by item 11 of theFirst Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14) of1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 19th August, 2004,

Andwhereas, the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extention of the said period by a further period of six months.

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Sub-clause (vi) of clause (n) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Central Govern- ment hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act, for a period of six months from the 19th February, 2005.

[F. No. S- 11017/2/2002- IR(PL) ] J. P. PATI, Jt. Secy.

Printedby the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054,