This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं०डी एल ( एन ) 04/ 0007/ 2003-05

REGD . No. DL (N) 04/0007 / 2003-05

जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 10]

No. 10]

नई दिल्ली, फरवरी 27 - मार्च 5, 2005 शनिवार /फाल्गुन 8- फाल्गुन 14 , 1926 NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 27-MARCH 5 , 2005, SATURDAY/PHALGUNA 8- PHALGUNA 14, 1926 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3-उप -खण्ड ( ii) PART II- Section 3 Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

वित्त मंत्रालय

(Department of Revenue) (OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE)

(राजस्वविभाग) (आयुक्तालय केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क ) सं. 02/2004- सीमा- शुल्क ( अधि. ) कोलकाता, 17 अगस्त, 2004

No. 02/2004- Customs (N.T.) Kolkata, the 17th August , 2004

का.आ. 696.-सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन प्रदत्य अधिकार के तहत अधिसूचना सं. 33/94-सीमाशुल्क (अधि. ) दिनांक 1 जुलाई , 1994 के साथ पठित वि. मं. ( रा. वि. ) परिपत्र सं. 31 /2003 - सीमाशुल्क दिनांक 07-04-2003 द्वारा प्रत्यायोजित अधिकार के अनुसार सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन कोननगर, जिला हुगली , पश्चिम बंगाल को इसके साथ मालगोदाम स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित किया जाता है , ताकि वहां विकास आयुक्त फलता एक्सपोर्ट प्रोसेसिंग जोन, वाणिज्य एवं औद्योगिक मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार द्वारा अनुमोदन प्राप्त एक शत प्रतिशत निर्यात उमुखी इकाई स्थापित की जा सके ।

S.O. 696. In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 as delegated by Notification No. 33 /94 -Customs (NT) dated 1st July, 1994 read with M.F. (D.R. ) Circular No. 31 /2003 -Customs dated 07-04-2003 ; Konnagar , Dist-Hooghly, in the State of. West Bengal is hereby declared to be Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 for the purpose of setting up 100% Export Oriented Unit as approved by the Development Commissioner, Falta Export Processing Zone, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.

[सी. सं. IV( 11 ) 1 /सीई/पीआर ओ/कोल- IV/ 2004 ]

डी.के. दत्ता, आयुक्त

[C. No. IV ( 11 ) 1 / CE/PRO/CAL - IV/2004 ] D. K. DATTA, Commissioner 565 GI/05

(1995) 1996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

सं. 03/2004-सीमा-शुल्क ( अधि. ) कोलकाता, 24 अगस्त, 2004

का.आ. 697.-सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन प्रदत्य अधिकार के तहत अधिसूचना सं. 33 /94 - सीमाशुल्क (अधि. ) दिनांक 1 जुलाई , 1994 के साथ पठित वि. मं. ( रा. वि. ) परिपत्र सं. 31/2003 - सीमाशुल्क दिनांक 07-04-2003 द्वारा प्रत्यायोजित अधिकार के अनुसार सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन ग्राम व डाकघर- खडीयाल, जिला हुगली, पश्चिम बंगाल को इसके साथ मालगोदाम स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित किया जाता है , ताकि वहां विकास आयुक्त फलता एक्सपोर्ट प्रोसेसिंग जोन, वाणिज्य एवं औद्योगिक मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार द्वारा अनुमोदन प्राप्त एक शत प्रतिशत निर्यात उमुखी इकाई स्थापित की जा सके ।

[सी. सं. IV/( 11 ) 1 /सीई/पीआर ओ/कोल- IV/ 2004 ] डी.के. दत्ता, आयुक्त No. 03 /2004-Customs ( N.T.) Kolkata , the 24th August , 2004

S.O. 697. In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 as delegated by Notification No. 33/94-Customs ( NT) dated 1st July, 1994 read with M.F. (D.R. ) Circular No. 31 /2003 -Customs dated 07-04-2003 Village & P.O. Kharial , Distt.-Hooghly, in the State ofWest Bengal is hereby declared to be Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 for the purpose of setting up 100 % Export Oriented Unit as approved by the Development Commissioner , Falta Export Processing Zone, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India .

[C. No. IV( 11 ) 1 / CE /PRO/ CAL - IV/2004] D. K. DATTA , Commissioner सं. 04/2004-सीमा-शुल्क ( अधि. )

कोलकाता, 13 सितम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 698.- सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन प्रदत्य अधिकार के तहत अधिसूचना सं. 33/94- सीमाशुल्क (अधि. ) दिनांक 1 जुलाई , 1994 के साथ पठित वि. मं . ( रा. वि. ) परिपत्र सं. 31/2003 सीमाशुल्क दिनांक 07-04-2003 द्वारा प्रत्यायोजित अधिकार के अनुसार सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन मौजा, थाना व डाकघर- भद्रेश्वर, जिला हुगली, पश्चिम बंगाल को इसके साथ मालगोदाम स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित किया जाता है , ताकि वहां विकास आयुक्त फलता एक्सपोर्ट प्रोसेसिंग जोन, वाणिज्य एवं औद्योगिक मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार द्वारा अनुमोदन प्राप्त एक शत प्रतिशत निर्यात उमुखी इकाई स्थापित की जा सके ।

[सी. सं. IV/ ( 11 ) 1 /सीई/पी आर ओ/कोल- IV/ 2004 ]

डी.के. दत्ता, आयुक्त No. 04/2004-Customs (N.T. ) Kolkata, the 13th September , 2004

S.O. 698. In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 as delegated by

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] Notification No. 33 /94- Customs ( NT) dated 1st July, 1994 read with M.F. (D.R.) Circular No. 31 /2003 -Customs dated 07-04-2003 , Mouza -Bhadreswar P.S. & P.O. Bhadreswar , Distt . Hooghly, in the State of West Bengal is hereby declared to be Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 for the purpose of setting up 100% Export Oriented Unit as approved by the Development Commissioner, Falta Export Processing Zone , Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India .

[ C. No. IV ( 11 ) 1 / CE /PRO/ CAL - IV/2004 ] D.K. DATTA , Commissioner आदेश नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2005 स्टाम्प

का.आ. 699.- भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम, 1899 ( 1899 का 2) की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों काप्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा पावर फाइनेंस कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, नई दिल्ली को मात्र एक करोड़ ग्यारह लाख सैंतीस हजार रुपये के समेकित स्टाम्प ड्यूटी अदा करने की अनुमति प्रदान करती है, जो उक्त नियम द्वारा जारी किये जाने वाले मात्र तीन सौ एक करोड़ रुपये के समग्र मूल्य के प्रत्येक दस लाख रुपये के 00000001 से 00003010 तक की विशिष्ट संख्या वाले ऋणपत्रों के स्वरूप के 6.80 % असुरक्षित, विमोच्य, गैर- परिवर्तनीय गैर- संचयी करयोग्य बंध - पत्रों (2011 ) -XXI ए श्रृंखला पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है । [सं. 5/2005 - स्टाम्प/फा. सं. 33/ 6/ 2005- बि.क. ] आर.जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव

ORDER New Delhi , the 8th February, 2005 STAMPS

S.O. 699.- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act , 1899 (2 of 1899 ) . the Central Government hereby permits Power Finance Corporation Limited, New Delhi to pay consolidated stamp duty of rupees one crore eleven lakh thirty seven thousand only chargeable on account of the stamp duty on 6.80 % Unsecured Redeemable Non - Convertible Non - Cumulative Taxable Bonds (2011 ) -XXIA Series in the nature of Debentures bearing distinctive numbers from 00000001 to 00003010 of rupees ten lakh each aggregating to rupeees three hundred one crore only, to be issued by the said Corporation [No.0. 5 / 2005 - STAMP/F.No . 33 /6 /2005 - ST] R.G. CHHABRA, Under Secy. आदेश नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2005 स्टाम्प

का.आ. 700.- भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम, 1899 ( 1899 का 2 ) की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा ट्रांसमिशन कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, आन्ध्र प्रदेश को मात्र एक करोड़ बयालीस लाख पचास [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1997

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005 /फाल्गुन14, 1926

हजार रुपए के समेकित स्टाम्प ड्यूटी अदा करने की अनुमति प्रदान करती है , जो उक्त नियम द्वारा जारी किये जाने वाले मात्र तीन सौ अस्सी करोड़ रुपये के समग्र मूल्य के ऋणपत्रों के स्वरूप वाले असुरक्षित , विमोच्य, गैर - परिवर्तनीय अपट्रांसकों विद्युत बंधपत्रों ( श्रृंखला 1/2004) पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है ।

[सं. 6/2005 - स्टाम्प/फा. सं. 33/48/2004-बि.क. ] आर.जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव

ORDER

New Delhi , the 21st February, 2005

STAMPS

S.O. 700.-In exercise of the powers conferredby clause (b) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act , 1899 (2 of 1899 ), the Central Government hereby permits Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited , Hyderabad to pay consolidated stamp duty of rupees one crore forty two lakh fifty thousand only on account of the stamp duty on Unsecured Redeemable Non-Convertible APTRANSCO Vidyut Bonds (Series I/2004) in the nature of debentures aggregating to rupees three hundred eighty crore only, to be issued by the said Corporation.

[No. 6/2005 - STAMP/F.No . 33 /48/2004 - ST] R.G. CHHABRA, Under Secy.

(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड ) नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005 (आयकर )

का.आ. 701.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( v ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " तिरुमाला तिरुपति देवस्थानमस, तिरुपति, चित्तूर, आन्ध्र प्रदेश " को निर्धारण वर्ष 2005- 2006 से 2007-2008 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्: - (i) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ;

( ii) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

( iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग सेलेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय- कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पत्तियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दीजाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 54/2005/फा. सं. 197/77/2004- आयकर नि -1 ] दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव (Central Board of Direct Taxes) New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 (INCOME TAX)

S.O. 701. In exercise of powers conferred by the sub clause ( v) of clause ( 23 ) of section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams , Tirupati , Chittoor , A.P. " for the purpose of the said sub-clause for the assessment years 2005-2006 to 2007-2008 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section (5) of Section 11 ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- taxAct , 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No: 54/2005/F. No. 197 / 77/ 2004 - ITA-I ] DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2005 (आयकर )

का.आ. 702.-आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " याचिंग एसोसिएशन ऑफ इंडिया, नई दिल्ली " को निर्धारण वर्ष 1999-2000 से 2001-2002 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित 1998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्: -

the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- taxAct, 1961;

( i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

[Notification No. 63 /2005 /F. No. 196/ 5 / 2003 - ITA - I ] DEEPAK GARG , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005 (आयकर) ( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्योंकी प्राप्तिके प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

का.आ. 703.-आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 19961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खएड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " पंजाब इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर डेवलपमेंट बोर्ड, ( पी. आई. डी. बी. ) चण्डीगढ़ " को निर्धारण वर्ष 2003-2004 से 2005-2006 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्: - (iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(i) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और . परिसम्पत्तियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दीजाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 63/2005/फा. सं. 196/5/ 2003- आयकर नि-1 ] दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव

(ii) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

New Delhi , the 21st February, 2005 (INCOME TAX)

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्योंकी प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार केसंबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

S.O. 702. In exercise of powers conferred by the clause ( 23 ) of Section 10 of the Income -tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "Yachting Association of India , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 1999-2000 to 2001-2002 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय- कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पत्तियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दीजाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 55/2005/फा. सं. 197/124/2004- आयकर नि- I ] दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 (INCOME TAX) (ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section ( 5) of Section 11 ;

S.O. 703. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub - clause ( iv) of clause (23 ) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby (iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1999

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

notifies the " Punjab Infrastructure Development Board, (PIDB) , Chandigarh " for the purpose of the said sub- clause for the assessment year 2003-2004 to 2005-2006 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i ) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery , furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified insub - section ( 5 ) of Section 11 ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income- tax authority in accordance with the provisions ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 55/2005/F. No. 197/ 124/2004 -ITA - I ] DEEPAK GARG , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2005 (आयकर)

का.आ. 704.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग) के उप- खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड एतद्वारा " दि भारत स्काउट्स एण्ड गाईड्स , नई दिल्ली " को निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-2005 से 2006-2007 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्:-

(i) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्योंकी प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा - पुस्तिकाएं नहीं 'रखी जाती हों;

( iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

[अधिसूचना सं. 59/2005/फा.सं. 197/159/2004- आयकर नि- I ] दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st February, 2005 (INCOME TAX)

S.O. 704. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub-clause ( iv) of (23C) of Section 10 of the Income -tax Act, 1961 ( 43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "The Bharat Scouts and Guides , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment year 2004-2005 to 2006-2007 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified insub - section (5 ) of Section 11 ;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are, maintained in respect of such business ; - (iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act , 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 59/2005 /F. No. 197/ 159 /2004- ITA - I ] · DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.

2000

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2005

(आयकर)

years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified insub- section (5 ) of Section 11 ;

का.आ. 705.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " इंस्टीट्यूट फॉर फाइनेनन्शियल मैनेजमेंट एण्ड रिसर्च, चैन्नई " को निर्धारण वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्: -

( iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income- tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- taxAct , 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 60/2005 /F. No. 197/ 157 / 2004 - ITA - I ] DEEPAK GARG , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी, 2005

(आयकर) ( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

का.आ. 706.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " इंदिरा गाँधी नेशनल सैन्टर फॉर दि आर्टस , जनपथ , नई दिल्ली " को निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-2005 से 2006-2007 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्: - ( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्योंकी प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( IV) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

[अधिसूचना सं. 60/2005/फा. सं . 197/157/2004- आयकर नि.- I ] दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st February. 2005

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(INCOME TAX)

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्योंकी प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

S.O. 705.- In exercise of powers conferred by the sub- clause ( iv) of ( 23C) of section 10 of the Income- tax Act . 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Institute for Financial Management and Research. Chennai for the purpose of the said sub-clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely :--

( i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

[अधिसूचना सं. 61/2005/फा. सं. 197/05/2005 - आयकर नि-1 ] ( ii ) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery. furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment

दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2001

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

New Delhi , the 21st February, 2005

(INCOME TAX)

S.O. 706. In exercise of powers conferred by the sub-clause ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Indira,Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, Janpath, New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub- clause for the assessment year 2004-2005 to 2006-2007 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section (5 ) of Section 11 ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- taxAct , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 61 /2005/F. No. 197/ 05/ 2005 - ITA -1]

DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 21 फरवरी , 2005

(आयकर )

का.आ. 707.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप - खंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा " इंडियन इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ पब्लिक एडमिनिस्ट्रेशन , नई दिल्ली " को निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-2005 से 2006-2007 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्: - (i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकोंसे भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

[अधिसूचना सं. 62/2005/फा. सं. 197/158/2004- आयकर नि. -1 ] दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st February, 2005 (INCOME TAX)

S.O. 707. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub -clause ( iv) of clause ( 23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ( 43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Indian Institute of Public Administration , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub- clause for the assessment year 2004-2005 to 2006-2007 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

( ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified insub - section (5 ) of Section 11 ;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the , assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordancewith the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 62/2005 /F. No. 197/ 158/2004 - ITA - I ]

DEEPAK GARG , Under Secy.

2002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी , 2005 (आयकर)

का.आ. 708.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप - खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " द थियोसाफिकल सोसायटी, अडयार , चेन्नई " को निर्धारण वर्ष 2005-2006 से 2007-2008 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात: -

(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(ui ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्तिके प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(IV ) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धमार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं ० 64/ 2005/फा.सं० 197/23/2005- आयकर नि. I ] दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 22nd February, 2005 (INCOME TAX)

S.O. 708. In excercise of powers conferred by the Sub - clause ( iv) of clause ( 23C) of Section 10 of the Income - tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " The Theosophical Society, Adyar, Chennai for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2005-2006 to 2007-2008 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established:

(ii ) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery , furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous ycars relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or

[PART II-SEC .3 (ii)] more of the forms or modes specified in sub- section (5) of Section 11 ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 64/2005 /F. No. 197/23 /2005 - ITA - I ] DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.

( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 709.- इंडस्ट्रियल डेवलपमेंट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया- लिमिटेड के संगम अनुच्छेद के अनुच्छेद 116 ( 1 ) ( ख ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा श्री जे ० एन ० गोडबोले को तत्काल प्रभाव से 31 मई , 2005 तक की अवधि के लिए या अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंधक निदेशक की नियुक्ति होने तक , जो भी पहले हो, इंडस्ट्रियल डेवलपमेंट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया लिमिटेड के निदेशक मंडल में पूर्णकालिक निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है । श्री जे ० एन ० गोडबोले उपर्युक्त नियुक्ति के जारी रहने के दौरान इंडस्ट्रियल डेवलपमेंट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया लिमिटेड के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक का कार्यभार भी संभालेंगे ।

[फा. सं . 24 ( 2 ) /2003- आईएफ-1 ]

अतुल कुमार राय , निदेशक (Department of Economic Affairs) (BANKING DIVISION) New Delhi , the 18th February, 2005 S.O. 709. The Central Government hereby appoints with immediate effect Shri J.N. Godbole , as a whole time Director on the Board of Directors of Industrial Development Bank of India Limited under Article 116 ( 1 ) (b) of the Articles of Association of Industrial Development Bank of India Limited for a period up to May 31, 2005 or until the appointment of Chairman and Managing Director whichever is eariler . Shri J.N. Godbole during the currency of the above appointment would also discharge the functions of Chairman and Managing Director of Industrial Development Bank of India Limited.

[ F. No. 24 (2)/2003 - IF. I] ATUL KUMAR RAI , Director नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 710.- सरकारी स्थान ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम, 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा सरकार के [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2003

भारत काराजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

राजपत्रित अधिकारियों के स्तर के समकक्ष अधिकारी होने पर निम्नांकित सारणी के कालम ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित अधिकारियों को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजन के लिए सम्पदा अधिकारियों के रूप में नियुक्त करती है जो सारणी के कालम ( 2 ) में उल्लिखित सरकारी स्थानों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम के द्वारा या उसके अधीन सम्पदा अधिकारियों को प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे और उन्हें सौंपे गए कर्तव्यों को पूरा करेंगे:-

सारणी

अधिकारी का पदनाम

क्रम सं०

सरकारी स्थानों की श्रेणियां तथा क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमाएं 1

1. सहायक महाप्रबन्धक, परिसरविभाग, प्रधान कार्यालय, स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद, गनफाउन्ड्री,

हैदराबाद

स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद का अपने प्रधान कार्यालय , गनफउन्ड्री शाखा एवं सिकंदराबाद स्थित प्रधान कार्यालय एवं अंचल कार्यालयों के नियंत्रण के तहत शाखाओं/कार्यालयों एवं वहां तैनात/कार्य कर रहे अधिकारियों के आवास सहित अन्य उद्देश्योंके लिए उसकी संपत्ति वाले अथवा उसके द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए याअधिगृहित एवं आन्ध्र प्रदेश एवं तमिलनाडु में अवस्थित परिसर

बैंक की संपत्ति वाले अथवा बैंक द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए या उनकी ओर से अधिगृहित एवं कर्नाटक राज्य में अवस्थितसभी शाखाएं, कार्यालय एवं अन्य परिसर

कार्यालय , स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद, अंचल कार्यालय, वारांगल 2. मुख्य प्रबन्धक , उप महाप्रबन्धक का

3. मुख्य प्रबन्धक, उप महाप्रबन्धक का कार्यालय, स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद, अंचल कार्यालय , वारांगल

अंचल कार्यालय, वारांगल के परि- चालन क्षेत्र में अवस्थित अपनी शाखाओं एवं वहीं कार्य कर रहे अधिकारियों के आवास के लिए बैंक की संपत्ति वाले अथवा उसके द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए या उनकी ओर से अभिगृहित सभी शाखाएं कार्यालय एवं अन्य परिसर

4. मुख्य प्रबन्धक, उप महाप्रबन्धक का कार्यालय, स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद, अंचल कार्यालय, विशाखापत्तनम

अंचल कार्यालय, विशाखापत्तनम के परिचालन क्षेत्र में अवस्थित अपनी शाखाओं एवं वहां कार्य कर रहे अधिकारियों के आवास के लिए बैंक की संपत्ति वाले अथवा उसके द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए या उसकी ओर सेअधिगृहित सभी परिसर उप महाप्रबन्धक का 5. मुख्य प्रबन्धक, कार्यालय, स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद, अंचल कार्यालय, औरंगाबाद

बैंक की संपत्ति वाले अथवा उसके द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए या उनकी ओर से अधिगृहित एवं अंचल कार्यालय, औरंगाबाद के परिचालन क्षेत्र में अवस्थित सभी शाखाएं, कार्यालय एवं अन्य परिसर

56.561105-2

1 2

6. मुख्य प्रबन्धक, उप महाप्रबन्धक का कार्यालय , स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, दिल्ली

बैंक की संपत्ति वाले अथवा उसके द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए या उसकी ओर से अधिगृहित एवं अंचल कार्यालय, दिल्ली के परिचालन क्षेत्र में अवस्थित सभी शाखाएं, कार्यालय एवं अन्य परिसर

बैंक की संपत्ति वाले अथवा उसके द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए या उसकी ओर से अधिगृहित एवं क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय मुम्बईके परिचालन क्षेत्र में अवस्थित सभी शाखाएं, कार्यालय एवं अन्य परिसर

7. मुख्य प्रबन्धक, उपमहाप्रबन्धक का कार्यालय , स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, मुम्बई

[फा. सं . 13/3/2005- बी ओ ए ] डी०पी ० भारद्वाज, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th February, 2005 S.O. 710. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ), the Central Government hereby appoints the officers mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Table below, being officers equivalent to the rank of Gazetted Officers of the Government , to be Estate Officers for the purpose of the said Act , who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on Estate Officer by or under the said Act in respect of the public premises specified in column (2) of the said Table .

TABLE

Sl . Designation

No. of theOfficer

Categories ofpublic premises and local limits of jurisdiction 1 2

1. The Asstt. GeneralManager, PremisesDepart- ment, Head Office, State Bank of Hyderabad, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad.

Premisesbelonging to or taken in lease or requisitioned by or on behalf of the State Bank of Hyderabad for its Head Office, Gunfoundry Branch and Branches /Offices under the control of the Head Office and Zonal Offices at Hyderabad and Secunderabad and other purposes including accomino- dation for officers posted/ working thereat and situated in A.P. and Tamilnadu .

All Branches , Offices and other premises belonging to or taken in lease or requisitioned by or on behalf of the Bank and situated in the State of Karnataka .

2. The ChiefManager , O/o Deputy GeneralManager, State Bank of Hyderabad, Zonal Office, Warangal

All premises belonging to or taken in lease or requisitioned by or on behalf of the Bank for 3. The ChiefManager, O/o Deputy General Manager , 2004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

State Bank of Hyderabad , Zonal Office,Warangal.

its branches , accommodation of officers working thereat etc, and situated within the operational area of the Zonal Office, Warangal .

4. The ChiefManager , O/ o Deputy General Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad . Zonal Office, Visakapatnam.

All premises belonging to or takenin lease or requisitioned by or on behalf of the Bank for its branches , accommodation of officers working thereat etc , and situated within the operational area of the Zonal Office,Visakapatnam.

All Branches , Offices and

other premises belonging to or

taken in lease or requisitioned

by or on behalf of the Bank

and situated within the

operational area of the Zonal 5. The Chief Manager , O/ o Deputy General Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad , Zonal Office, Aurangabad. Office , Aurangabad.

6. The Chief Manager, O/ o Deputy General Manager , State Bank of Hyderabad, Regional Office, Delhi.

All Branches . Offices and otherpremises belonging to or taken in lease or requisitioned by or on behalf of the Bank and situated within the operational area of the Regional Office, Delhi .

7. The Chief Manager , O/o Deputy General Manager, StateBank of Hyderabad, Regional Office , Mumbai.

All Branches , Offices and other premises belonging to or taken in lease or requisitioned by or on behalf of the Bank and situated within the operational area of the Regional Office , Mumbai .

[F. No. 13 /3 /2005 -B O AJ

D. P. BHARDWAJ, Under Secyу.

नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 711.- सरकारी स्थान ( अप्राधिकृत अम्भोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और दिनांक 9-4-90 के भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग , ( बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) की अधिसूचना सं. 13/5/89- बीओ- III तथा तत्पश्चात् दिनांक 9-3-1996 को भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. सं. 632 का अधिक्रमण करते हुए, ऐसे अधिक्रमण से पूर्व उन बातों के सिवाय, जिन्हें किया गया है या किए जाने के लिए छोड़ दिया गया है , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के स्तर के समकक्ष अधिकारी होने पर निम्नलिखित सारणी के कालम ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित अधिकारी को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजन के लिए सम्पदा अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करती है जो सारणी के कालम ( 2 ) में उल्लिखित सरकारी स्थानों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम के द्वारा या उसके अधीन सम्पदा अधिकारियों को प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे और उन्हें सौंपे गए कर्तव्यों को पूरा करेंगे:-

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

सारणी

अधिकारी का पदनाम सरकारी स्थानों की श्रेणियां तथा क्षेत्राधिकार कीस्थानीय सीमाएं

देना बैंक, जिसका प्रधान कार्यालय , मुम्बई मेंहै, केस्वामित्व वाले/उनकी संपत्ति वाले तथा उनके प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण वाले समूचे भारत में स्थित स्थान ।

सहायक महाप्रबंधक (विधि) , देना बैंक, प्रधान कार्यालय, मुम्बई

[फा. सं. 13/2/2005- बी ओ ए ] डी०पी ० भारद्वाज, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th February, 2005 S.O. 711. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act , 1971 (40 of 1971 ) , and supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance , Dept. of Economic Affairs ( Banking Division) , No. 13/ 5-89B.O . III dated 9-4-90 and subsequent notification published in the Gazette of India under S.O. No. 632 dated 9-3-1996 except in respect of things done or omitted to be done before such/ superscssion , the Central Government hereby appoints the officers mentioned in column( 1) ofthe Table below, being officers equivalent to the rank of a Gazetted Officers of Government to be Estate Officer for the purposes of the said Act . who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on the Estate Officers by or under the said Act in respect of the public premises specified in column ( 2 ) of the said table . TABLE

Designation of the Officer

Categories of public premises and local limits ofjurisdiction The Asstt . Gen. Manager (Legal ) , DenaBank , Head Office , Mumbai .

Premises situated any where in India owned by/belonging to, and under the administrative control of the Dena Bank having Head Office at Mumbai .

[F. No. 13 /2/2005 -BOA]

D. P. BHARDWAJ , Under Secу.

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 712.- प्रादेशिक ग्रामीण बैंक अधिनियम , 1976 (1976 का 21 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार 26 मार्च , 1983 को भारत के राजपत्र (असाधारण ) भाग II खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय ( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) , ( बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) का. आ. सं. 222(अ ) दिनांक 26 मार्च , 1983 की अधिसूचना में एतद्वारा , निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है :

उपर्युक्त अधिसूचना में " नैनीताल को उस स्थान के रूप में निर्धारित करती है, जहां पर नैनीताल अल्मोड़ा क्षेत्रीय ग्रामीण बैंक का मुख्य कार्यालय होगा " शब्दों के स्थान पर " हल्द्वानी को उस स्थान के रूप में निर्धारित करती है, जहां पर नैनीताल अल्मोड़ा क्षेत्रीय ग्रामीण बैंक का मुख्य कार्यालय होगा " शब्द प्रतिस्थापित किए जाएंगे ।

[फा. सं. 7 ( 7 )/2004- आरआरबी ] एम० के० मल्होत्रा, अवर सचिव टिप्पणी: प्रमुख नियम 26 मार्च , 1983 की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 222(अ) के तहत प्रकाशित किए थे । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन14 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st February, 2005 S.O. 712.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Regional Rural Banks Act , 1976 ( 21 of 1976) , the Central Government hereby makesthe following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department ofEconomicAffairs) (Banking Division) , number S.O. 222 (E) dated the 26th March , 1983 published in the Gazette of India , Extraordinary, Part II Section 3 Sub - section ( ii) dated the 26th March, 1983 .

In the said notification , for the words " Nainital as the place where Nainital Almora Kshetriya GraminBank shall have its head office " the words "Haldawani as the placewhere Nainitall Almora Kshetriya Gramin Bank shall have its head office " shall be substituted .

[F. No. 7 (7)/2004- RRB]

M. K. MALHOTRA, Under Secy. Note : The principal rules were published vide notification number S.O. 222 (E) dated the 26th March , 1983 .

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005 का.आ. 713.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1980 के खण्ड 5 के उपखण्ड ( I ) , खण्ड 7 और खण्ड 8 के 'उपखण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित खण्ड 3 के उपखण्ड ( क) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के साथ परामर्श करने के पश्चात, एतद्वारा. श्री आर.पी. सिंह, आई.ए.एस. ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश-1976) को उनके द्वारा कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगला आदेश जारी होने तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एण्ड सिंध बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. एफ. 9/12/2004- बी.ओ.- I ] जी० बी० सिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 713. In pursuance of sub -clause (a) of clause 3 read with sub - clause ( 1 ) of clause 5 , clause 7 and sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 8 of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1980, the Central Government , after consultation with the Reseve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri R. P. Singh , IAS (A. P. 1976) as the Chairman and Managing Director of the Punjab and Sind Bank, for the period of three years from the date of his taking charge or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 9/12/2004-B.O .- [] G.B. SINGH, Under Secy.

विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग )

शुद्धि-पत्र

नईदिल्ली, 18 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 714.- भारत सरकार के विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय ( विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग ) की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 57 तारीख 26 दिसम्बर, 2003 , जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2,

2005 खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) तारीख 10 जनवरी , 2004 को प्रकाशित की गई थी, के पृष्ठ 136 में-

के स्थान पर

पढ़े

"नियम, 2003 " "नियम 2004", (i) नियम 1 के उपनियम (1 ) में,

(ii) नियम 2 में,

" ( क) अनुपूरक नियम का.नि. 317 - कज-9 में , उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (5) में" पात्र आश्रित/ संबंधी को हकदारी से एक टाईप नीचे का निवास. आबंटित किया जाएगा " शब्दोंके स्थान पर

" ( क) का.नि. 317- कज-9 में , उप नियम (1) के खंड ( 5 ) में निम्नलिखित रखा जाएगा , अर्थात्- " ( V) पात्र आश्रित/ संबंधी को उसकी हकदारी का आवास आबंटित किया जाएगा । " " पात्र आश्रित/संबंधी को उसकी हकदारी का निवास आबंटित किया जाएगा " शब्द रखे जाएंगें;"

[फा.सं. एसएम/ 29/ 025 /1994 ] एस. चक्रवर्ती , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Department of Science and Technology) CORRIGENDA

New Delhi , the 18th January, 2005

S.O. 714. In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Science and Technology (Department of Science and Technology) number S.O. 57 dated the 26th December, 2003 published in the Gazette of India, Part , II , Section 3 Sub- section ( ii ) dated the 10th January, 2004 at page 136 ,-

for

read

"Rules, 2003 " "Rules, 2004" ;

(i) in rule 1 , insub- rule(1),

(ii) in rule 2 ,

"( a) inSupplementary Rule S.R. 317 -AH-9 , in sub - rule ( 1 ) , in clause (v) , the follow- ing clause shall be substituted , namely: - " ( v) The eligible dependant/ relation shall be allotted residence of his entitlement . " " ( a) in Supple- mentary Rule S.R: 317-AH-9 , in sub- rule ( 1 ) , in clause (v) , for the words " the eligible depen- dant/relation shall be allotted residence one type below the entitlement " the words " the

eligible dependant/ relation shall be allotted residence ofhis entitlement " shall be substituted; "

[F. No. SM/29 /025/ 1994 ]

S.CHAKRAVARTHY, Under Secy.

2006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्रालय

(वाणिज्य विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 715.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, दुग्ध उत्पाद के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण, निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम, 2000 का संशोधन करने के लिएनिम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है , अर्थात्:-

1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम दुग्ध उत्पादों के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण, निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) संशोधन नियम , 2005 है । (2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे । 2. दुग्ध उत्पादों के निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण , निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम , 2000 में नियम 8 , के उपनियम 8.4 स्थान पर निम्नलिखित उपनियम रखा जाएगा , अर्थात्: -

" 8.4अपील का निपटारा उसकी प्राप्ति के तीस दिनों के अंदर कर दिया जाएगा । "

[फा. सं. 6/ 1/2000 - ईआई एण्ड ईपी ]

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 716.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, बासमती चावल के निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 2003 का संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है , अर्थात्: -

1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम बासमती चावलके निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण, और निरीक्षण ) संशोधन नियम , 2005 है । (2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे । 2. बासमती चावल के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण) नियम, 2003 में नियम 8 , - ( i ) खंड (घ) के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित उपनियम रखा जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

५ " ( घ) अपील का निपटारा उसकी प्राप्ति के तीस दिनों के अंदर कर दिया जाएगा । "

( ii) खंड (ङ) का लोप किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. 6/2/2000- ईआई एण्ड ईपी ]

राज सिंह, निदेशक

टिप्पण: मूल नियम, अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 2720 तारीख 16 दिसम्बर, 2000 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित किए गए थे और तत्पश्चात्अधिसूचना सं.का.आ. 3719 तारीख 30 नवम्बर, 2002 और का.आ. 999 (अ ) तारीख 13 सितम्बर, 2004 द्वारा संशोधित किए गए थे ।

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (Department of Commerce)

New Delhi , the 25th February , 2005 S.O. 715. In exercise of the powers conferred by section 17 of the Export ( Quality Control and Inspection) Act , 1963 (22 of 1963 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to amend the Export of Milk Products (Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Rules, 2000 , namely: -

1. ( 1 ) These rules may be called the Export of Milk Products ( Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring ) Amendment Rules, 2005 .

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Export of Milk Products (Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Rules , 2000 , in rule 8 , for sub - rule 8.4 , the following sub - rule shall be substituted , namely:-

" 8.4 The appeal shall be disposed of within thrity days of its receipt . "

[F. No. 6/1 /2000 -EI &EP ]

RAJ SINGH , Director Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India vide notification number S.O. No. 2720 dated the 16th December , 2000 and subsequently amended vide notifications number S.O. 3719 dated 30th November, 2002 and S.O. 999(E) dated the 13th September, 2004.

टिप्पण: मूल नियम , अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 68 ( अ ) तारीख 23 जनवरी , 2003 के द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र असाधारण में प्रकाशित किए गए थे ।

New Delhi , the 25th February, 2005

S.O. 716. In exercise of the powers conferred by section 17 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to amend the Export of Basmati Rice (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules, 2003, namely:

1. ( 1 ) These rules may be called the Export of Basmati Rice (Quality Control and Inspection ) Amendment Rules , 2005.

(2) They shall come into force on the date oftheir publication in the Official Gazette .

2. In the Export of Basmati Rice ( Quality Control and Inspection) Rules , 2003 , in rule 8,-

( i ) for clause (d) the following clause shall be substituted , namely :-

"(d) The appeal shall be disposed of within thirty daysof its receipt . "

(ii) clause (e ) shall be omitted.

[ F. No. 6/2/2000 - EI &EP ]

RAJ SINGH , Director Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary vide notification number S.O. No. 68 (E) dated the 23rd January, 2003.

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 717.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, ताजी, शीतित , और प्रसंस्कृत मछली 2007 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2005 और मछली उत्पादों के निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण, निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम , 1995 का संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है , अर्थात्: -

1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम ताजी, शीतित , और प्रसंस्कृत मछली और मछली उत्पादों के निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण, निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) संशोधन नियम , 2005 है ।

का.आ. 718.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, बायवाल्व मोलस्कस के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम, 2003 का संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है , अर्थात्: - ( 2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे ।

1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम बायवाल्व मोलस्कस के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) संशोधन नियम, 2005है।

(2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे । 2. ताजी, शीतित, और प्रसंस्कृत मछली और मछली उत्पादों केनिर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण, निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम , 1995 में नियम 17, के उपनियम 17.4 के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित उपनियम रखा जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

" 17.4 अपील का निपटारा उसकी प्राप्ति के तीस दिनों के अंदर कर दिया जाएगा । "

2. बायवाल्व मोलस्कस के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम, 2003 में नियम 10 , के उपनियम ( 4 ) के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित उपनियम रखा जाएगा, अर्थात्: - [फा. सं. 6/2/2001- ईआई एण्ड ईपी ]

" (4) अपील का निपटारा उसकी प्राप्ति के तीस दिनों के अंदर कर दिया जाएगा । "

राज सिंह , निदेशक

[फा. सं . 6/3/2002- ईआई एण्ड ईपी ] टिप्पण: मूल नियम, अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 730( अ ) तारीख 21

राज सिंह, निदेशक

टिप्पण: मूल नियम, अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 668 ( अ ) तारीख 10 जून, 2003 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र असाधारण में प्रकाशित किए गए थे ।

अगस्त, 1995 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र, असाधारण में प्रकाशित किए गए थे और तत्पश्चात् अधिसूचना सं.का.आ. 415 (अ) तारीख 11 अप्रैल, 2002 और का.आ. 1029 (अ) तारीख 24 सितम्बर, 2002 और का. आ. 1034 ( अ ) तारीख 9 सितम्बर, 2003 द्वारा संशोधित किए गए थे ।

New Delhi , the 25th February, 2005 New Delhi , the 25th February, 2005

S.O. 718. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 17 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act , 1963 (22 of 1963 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to amend the Export of Bivalve Molluscs (Quality Control, Inspection and Monitoring) Rules , 2003 , namely :-

S.O. 717. In exercise of the powers conferred by section 17 of the Export ( Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Export of Fresh, Frozen and Processed Fish and Fishery Products (Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Rules , 1995 , namely:-

1. ( 1 ) These rules may be called the Export of Bivalve Molluscs (Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Amendment Rules , 2005 .

1. ( 1 ) These rules may be called the Export of Fresh , Frozenand Processed Fish and Fishery Products (Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring ) Amendment Rules , 2005.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette .

2. In the Export of Bivalve Molluscs ( Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Rules , 2003 , in rule 10 , for sub - rule (4 ) , the following sub - rule shall be substituted , namely :-

2. In the Export of Fresh , Frozen and Processed Fish and Fishery Products (Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring ) Rules, 1995 , in rule 17 , for sub - rule 17.4, the following sub - rule shall be substituted, namely :-

"(4) The appeal shall be disposed of within thrity daysof its receipt. "

" 17.4 The appeal shall be disposed of within thrity days of its receipt . "

[F. No. 6/3/2002-EI&EP] RAJ SINGH, Director [F. No. 6/2/2001 -ΕΙ&ΕΡ] RAJ SINGH, Director

Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary vide notification number S.O. 668 (E) dated the10th June, 2003 .

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2005 Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary vide notification number S.O. 730 (E) dated the 21st August , 1995 and subsequently amended vide notifications number S.O. 415 (E) dated 11th April , 2002 and S.O. 1029 (E) dated the 24th September, 2002 and S.O. 1034 (E) dated the 9th September, 2003 .

का.आ. 719.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, ताजा मुर्गी मांस और मुर्गी मांस उत्पादों के निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण, निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) 2008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

नियम, 2002 का संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है, अर्थात्:-

1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम ताजा मुर्गी मांस और मुर्गी मांस उत्पादों के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण , निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) संशोधन नियम , 2005 है ।

( 2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे । 2. ताजा मुर्गी मांस और मुर्गी मांस उत्पादों के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण, निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम, 2002 में नियम 8 , के उपनियम ( 6 ) के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित उपनियम रखा जाएगा , अर्थात्: - " ( 6 ) अपील का निपटारा उसकी प्राप्ति के तीस दिनों के अंदर कर दिया जाएगा । "

[ फा. सं. 6/2/98-ईआई एण्ड ईपी ]

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] " (4) अपील का निपटारा उसकी प्राप्ति के तीस दिनों के अंदर कर दिया जाएगा । "

[फा० सं ० 6/5/2000- ईआई एण्ड ईपी ]

राज सिंह, निदेशक टिप्पण: मूल नियम अधिसूचना सं ० का० आ० 1376 ( अ ) तारीख 30 दिसम्बर, 2002 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र, असाधारण में प्रकाशित किए गए थे और तत्पश्चात् अधिसूचना सं ० का० आ० 233 तारीख 31 जनवरी , 2004 द्वारा संशोधित किया गया था । New Delhi, the 25th February , 2005

राज सिंह, निदेशक

टिप्पण: मूल नियम, अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 1378 ( अ ) तारीख 30 दिसम्बर, 2002 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र असाधारण में प्रकाशित किए गए थे ।

New Delhi , the 25th February , 2005

S.O. 719. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 17 of the Export ( Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 ( 22 of 1963 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to amend the Export of Fresh poultry meat and poultry meat Products ( Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Rules , 2002 , namely:

1 ( 1 ) These rules may be called the Export of Fresh poultry meat and poultry meat Products ( Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring ) Amendment Rules , 2005 .

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette .

2 In the Export of Fresh poultry meat and poultry meat Products ( Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring ) Rules , 2002, in rule 8, for sub - rule (6), the following sub - rule shall be substituted , namely :-

" ( 6 ) The appeal shall be disposed of within thrity days of its receipt . "

[F. No. 6/2/98 -ΕΙ&ΕΡ ]

RAJ SINGH, Director Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary vide notification number S.O. 1378 ( E ) dated the 30th December, 2002 .

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 720.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, सूखी मछली के निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 2002 का और संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है , अर्थात्: -

1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम सूखी मछली के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) संशोधन नियम, 2005है ।

(2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे । 2. सूखी मछली के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण) नियम, 2002 में नियम 9 के उपनियम ( 4 ) के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित उपनियम रखा जाएगा अर्थात्: -

S.O. 720. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 17 of the Export ( Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Export of Dried Fish (Quality Control and Inspection ) Rules , 2002 , namely:-

1. (1 ) These rules may be called the Export of Dried Fish (Quality Control and Inspection ) Amendment Rules . 2005.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette .

2. In the Export of Dried Fish (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules , 2002, in rule 9, for sub -rule (4), the following sub - rule shall be substituted, namely : "(4) The appeal shall be disposed of within thirty days of its receipt ."

[ F. No 6/ 5/2000 - EI& EP ]

RAJ SINGH . Director Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary vide notification number S. O. 1376 ( E ) dated the 30th December, 2002 and subsequently amended vide notification number S. O. 233 dated the 31st January, 2004.

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 721.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, अंडा उत्पाद के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण, निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम, 1997 का और संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है , अर्थात्: - 1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम अंडा उत्पादों के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण. निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) संशोधन नियम, 2005 है ।

(2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे । 2. अंडा उत्पादों के निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण , निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम , 1997 में नियम 8 के उपनियम 8.6 के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित उपनियम रखा जाएगा अर्थात्: - " 8.6 अपील का निपटारा उसकी प्राप्ति के तीस दिनों के अंदर कर दिया जाएगा । "

[फा० सं० 6/1/95 - ईआई एण्ड ईपी ]

राज सिंह, निदेशक टिप्पण: मूल नियम अधिसूचना सं ० का ० आ ० 2078 तारीख 23 अगस्त, 1997 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित किए गए थे और तत्पश्चात् अधिसूचना सं ० का ० आ० 1443 ( अ ) तारीख 19 दिसम्बर, 2003 द्वारा संशोधित किए गए थे । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2009

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

New Delhi , the 25th February, 2005 S.O. 721. In exercise of the powers conferred by the Section 17 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Export of Egg Products (Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Rules , 1997 , namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Export ofEgg Products ( Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Amendment Rules , 2005 .

(2) They shall come into force on the date of theirpublication in the Official Gazette .

2. In the Export of Egg Products (Quality Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Rules , 1997 , in rule 8, for sub - rule 8.6 , the following sub - rule shall be substituted , namely :

" 8.6 The appeal shall be disposed of within thirty days of it receipt . "

[F. No. 6/ 1/95 -EI& EP] RAJ SINGH, Director Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India , vide notification number S. O. 2078 dated the 23rd August, 1997 and subsequently amended vide notification number S. O. 1443 (E ) dated the 19th December , 2003 .

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 722.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, सूखी मछली माव्स के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 2002 का संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है , अर्थात्: -

1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम सूखी मछली माव्स के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) संशोधन नियम, 2005 है ।

(2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे । 2. सूखी मछली माव्स के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 2002 में नियम 9,-

(क) उपनियम (4 ) के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित उपनियम रखा जाएगा अर्थात्:-

" (4) अपील का निपटारा उसकी प्राप्ति के तीस दिनों के अंदर कर दिया जाएगा । "

(ख) उपनियम ( 5 ) का लोप किया जाएगा ।

[फा० सं० 6/6/2000/ईआई एण्ड ईपी ]

राज सिंह, निदेशक टिप्पण: मूल नियम अधिसूचना सं० का ० आ० 2877 तारीख 14 सितम्बर, 2002 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र, में प्रकाशित किए गए थे । New Delhi , the 25th February, 2005 S.O. 722. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 17 of the Export ( Quality Control and Inspection) Act , 1963 (22 of 1963) , the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to amend the Export of Dried Fish Maws (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules , 2002, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Export of Dried Fish Maws (Quality Control and Inspection) Amendment Rules , 2005 .

(2) They shall come into force on the date of theirpublication in the Official Gazette .

2. In theExport of Dried Fish Maws (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules, 2002, in rule 9 ,-

(a) for sub rule (4) , the following sub - rule shall be substituted, namely:

"(4) The appeal shall be disposed of within thirty daysof it receipt . "

(b) sub - rule ( 5) shall be omitted .

[F. No. 6/6/2000 -EI& EP ] RAJ SINGH, Director Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India , vide notification number S. O. 2877 dated the 14th September, 2002.

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 723.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 17 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, काजू की गिरियों के निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1986 का संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है , अर्थात्: -

1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम काजू की गिरियों के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) संशोधन नियम , 2005है ।

(2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे । 2. काजूके गिरियों के निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1986 में नियम 4 , के खंड ( घ ) के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित खंड रखा जाएगा, अर्थात्: -

" ( घ) अपील का निपटारा उसकी प्राप्ति के तीस दिनों के अंदर कर दिया जाएगा । "

[फा० सं० 6/(9 )/83/ईआई एण्ड ईपी ]

राज सिंह, निदेशक टिपपण: मूल नियम अधिसूचना सं ० का० आ० 783 तारीख 1 मार्च, 1986 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित किए गए थे । New Delhi , the 25th February, 2005 S.O. 723. In exercise of the powers conferred by the Section 17 ofthe Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 ( 22 of 1963 ) ; the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to amend the Export of Cashew Kernels (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules, 1986 , namely:-

1. (1 ) These rules may be called the Export of Cashew Kernels ( Quality Control and Inspection) Amendment Rules , 2005.

2010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette .

2. In the Export of Cashew Kernels (Quality Control and Inspection ) Rules , 1986, in rulc 4, for Clause(d). the following clause shall be substituted, namely:

"(d) The appeal shall be disposed of within thirty days of it receipt . "

[F. No. 6 ( 9)/83 -EI & EP ] RAJ SINGH , Director Note : The pricipal rules were published in the Gazette of India , vide notification number S. O. 783 dated the 1st , March, 1986 .

सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी , 2005

का.आ. 724.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, दिनांक 17 फरवरी , 2004 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अधिक्रमण में और चलचित्रकी अधिनियम (प्रमाणन ) नियमावली, 1983 के नियम 43 के साथ पठित चलचित्रकी अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5घ की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए सुश्री सागरिका घोष , डा० अलका बी. वड़ेक्कन और श्री आई नरसिंह राव को फिल्म प्रमाणन अपीलीय अधिकरण के सदस्यों के रूप में नियुक्त करती हैं । इनकी नियुक्तिश्री नितिन देसाई, श्री श्याम किशोर शर्मा और श्री राकेश सिन्हा के स्थान पर है तथा सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशित होने की तिथि से तीन वर्ष की अवधि अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, के लिए है ।

[फा ० सं० 811 /1 /2004- एफ ( सी) ] विश्वजीत महाय , निदेशक ( फिल्म) MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING New Delhi , the 10th January, 2005

S. O. 724. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) of Section 5D of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rule 43 of the Cinematograph Act ( Certification ) Rules , 1983 , and in supersession of notification of even No. dated 17th February, 2004 , the Central Government hereby appoints Ms. Sagarika Ghosh , Dr. Alka B Vadakkan and Shri 1. Narsinga Rao as Members of the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal . The appointment is vice Shri Nitin Desai , Shri Shyam Kishore Sharma and Shri Rakesh Sinha and is for a period ofthree years from the date of publication of this notification in the OfficialGazette or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 811 / 1 /2004 - F(C) ] VISHVAJIT SAHAY. Director (Films ) नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 725.-चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 3 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम, 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 3 की उप धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के सदस्यों की नियुक्ति से संबंधित पूर्व अधिसूचनाओं के अधिक्रमण में केन्द्रीय सरकार निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)] को इस बोर्ड के सदस्यों के रूप में तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेशों . तक नियुक्त करती है:-

1. श्रीमती मृणाल पांडे

2. श्रीसंजीव गोयनका

3. श्री एल. सुरेश

4. डॉ. मृणालिनी डी. पटेल

5. श्री टी. एस. एस. चौहान

6. श्रीहिमांशु जोशी

7. श्री पी. एस. भक्तवत्सलम उर्फ पुन्नीलन

8. श्री श्रवण श्रॉफ

9. श्री एस. वी. भास्कर राव

10. श्रीवीरेन्द्र सक्सेना

11. श्री के. टी. माही

12. श्रीसंजीव भार्गव

13. श्री ए. नटराजन

14. श्री विनोद के. बक्शी

15. श्री कृष्ण मोहन

16. श्री अनीस दुर्रानी

17. श्रीमती बोब्बिता शर्मा

18. डॉ. ( श्रीमती ) प्रियंवदा मोहंती हेजमाड़ी

19. डॉ. ( सुश्री ) शांता पी. हैलगी

20. श्रीमती के. इंदिरा बनर्जी

21. श्रीराजीव अरोड़ा

[फा. सं . 809/ 12/2003- एफ( सी ) ] विश्वजीत सहाय , निदेशक ( फिल्म) New Delhi , the 5th February , 2005

S. O. 725. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rule 3 of the Cinematograph (Certification ) rules . 1983 and in supersession of the carlier Notifications relating to appointment of members ofthe Central Board ofFilm Certification . the Central Government is pleased to appoint the following persons as members of the said Board with immediate effect and until further orders: -

1. Smt . Mrinal Pandey

2. Shri Sanjiv goenka

Shri L. Suresh 3.

Shri Mrunalini D. Patel 4.

Shri T.S.S. Chauhan 5.

6. Shri Himanshu Joshi

7. Shri P.S. Bhaktavatsalanı alias Ponneelan 8. Shri Shravan Shroff

9 . Shri M. V. Bhaskar Rao

10. Shri Virendra Saxena [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14, 1926

11. Shri K.T. Mahi

2011 26. श्रीमती के. ज्योत्सना

12. Shri Sanjeev Bhargava

27. श्री अरनन्दा बाबू सुंगरापती

13. Shri A. Natarajan

28. श्री श्रीराम यादव

14. Shri Vinod K. Bakshi

15. Shri Krishna Mohan

29. श्री मो. युसुफुद्दीन ( वाई. आरं. बाबू)

30. श्रीमती नरेल्ला सारदा

16. Shri Anis Durrani

31. श्रीमती स्त्रीवरा

17. Smt . Bobbeeta Sharma

32. श्रीमती सौदामनी

18. Dr.(Smt.) Priyambada Mohanty Hejmadi 19 . Dr. ( Ms. ) Shanta P. Halagi

33. श्रीमती अनुराधा के. राजू

20. Smt . K. Indira Banerjee

34. श्री जे. सी. पवन रेड्डी

35. श्रीमती सरन्या लोका रेड्डी

36. श्री याला सोनिया रेड्डी

37. डॉ. वड्डेपल्ली कृष्णा

21. Shri Rajiv Arora . [F. No. 809/12/2003 -F(C)] VISHVAJIT SAHAY, Director (Films) नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2005

38. श्रीमती टी. विजया लक्ष्मी

श्री एन. शिवा राम 39.

40. श्रीमती डी. विजयालक्ष्मी

41. डॉ. वी . सीतादेवी

42. श्री के . सी. शेखर रेड्डी

43. श्री जी. रघुवीर सिंह ठाकुर

44. डॉ. ए. सुधाकर यादव

का.आ. 726.- चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 7 और 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 को 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार, केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के हैदराबाद सलाहकार पैनल का पुनर्गठन करती है और निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को उक्त पैनल के सदस्यों के रूप में तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्षों की अवधि तक या अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, नियुक्त करती है । यह मंत्रालय के दिनांक 4 फरवरी, 2004 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अधिक्रमण में है । 45. श्री बी. वेंकटरामा रेड्डी

1. श्री पी. आर. सुभाष चंद्रन

46. श्री पी. पुरूषोतम रेड्डी

2. श्री एम. आर. कोंडल रेड्डी

47. श्री एम. मनमोहन रेड्डी

3. श्रीमती वडलामुडी अम्माजम्मा

48. श्रीमती के. शालिनी रमेश कुमार

4. श्रीमती मधु निर्मला देवी

49. श्री जोन्ना सत्यनारायण

5. श्रीमती कोटा सुनीला

50. सुश्री गुडलुरू वेंकटा अरूणा

6. डा. हसीना

51. श्री पोगाकु विश्वेश्चर

7. श्री सी. वी. सुब्बा राव

52. श्री वी. नारायणाराव

8. श्री बी. राजेश बाबू

53. श्री मुपल्ला गोविंदा राव

9. श्रीमती के. अरूणा व्यास

54. श्री कट्टा वेंकटेश्वरा राव

10. श्री जी० भगीराधा

55. श्री पक्कला सूरी बाबू

11. डॉ. आर . वत्सला

56. श्री के. रामना वेंकट

12. श्रीमती जी. विजया लक्ष्मी

57. श्री वी. विष्णु वर्धन रेड्डी

13. डॉ. तल्लुरी अंजनेयुलु

58. श्री पी . प्रजोथ रेड्डी

14. श्रीमती बी. सुगुना

59. श्रीमती मनोरमा

15. श्री श्रीपदा जिट्टु मोहन मित्रा

60. डॉ ( श्रीमती ) सुशीला

16. श्रीमती के. अनीता रेड्डी

61. श्री पी. सरथ कुमार

17. श्री राकेश जायसवाल

62. श्रीमती स्त्रीमणी एम ०

18. श्रीमतीपी. गीता

63. श्री आई तिरूमला राव

19. श्रीमती रत्नासरी

64. श्रीमती सोभा रानी

20. श्री एम. सूर्यानायक

65. श्रीमती पोलावरम कल्याणी

21 . श्रीमती एस. राधा बालासुब्रमणयम

66. श्रीमती पी. अंजनी देवी

22. श्री ए. वी. रामाना

67. श्री बूला प्रसाद सैम्यूल

23. श्रीजी. चंन्द्रसेखर

68. श्री वाई अमरेंधर रेड्डी

24. श्री एम. रामाराव

69. श्री ए. राजेंदर

25. श्री मंददी उदया कुमार

70. श्रीडोकला मुरली

56552/05-3 2012

71 श्रीदीदी रामबाबू

72. श्री एस . हरिनाथ रेड्डी

73 श्री ए. विजय कुमार

74. श्रीमती अपराजीता

75. श्री संबासिवा राव अला

76. श्री जगदीश चन्द्रा प्रसाद

77. श्री सीता रामा राजू

78. श्रीमती नमेलिकांति स्वर्णलता 79. श्रीमती कौशल्या सुरम

80. श्रीमतीदीपिकारेड्डी

81. श्रीमती ई. जया लक्ष्मी

82. श्रीं एस. गोपाल रेड्डी

83. श्रीमती अनंता लक्ष्मी

84. सुश्री पोट्टा भारती

85. श्री टी. एन. विश्वंभर

86. श्रीमती बी. विजया रेड्डी

87 श्रीजें नरसिंह राव

88. श्रीपोट्टुरी रंगा राव

[ फा० सं ० 809/3/2004- एफ( सी) ] पी० पी० नायर, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th February, 2005 S. O. 726. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 ( 37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) rules, 1983 the Central Government is pleased to reconstitute the Hyderabad advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification and to appoint the following persons as members of the said panel with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders, whichever is earlier . This supersedes this Ministry's notification of even number dated 4th February 2004 .

1. Shri P. R. Subhash Chandran 2 Shri M. R. Kondal Reddy 3. Sınt. Vadlamudi Ammajamma Shri Madhu Nirmala Devi 5. Smt. Kota Suneela

6. Dr. Haseena

7 Shri C. V. Suba Rao

8 Shri B. Rajesh Babu

9. Smt. K. Aruna Vyas

10. Shri G. Bhageeradha

11 . Dr. R. Vatsala

12. Smt . G. Vijaya Lakshmi 13. Dr. Talluri Anjaneyulu

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 14. Smt . B. Suguna

15. Shri Sripada Jittu Mohan Mitra

16. Smt . K. Anita Reddy

17. Shri Rakesh Jaiswal

18 . Smt . P. Geetha

19. Smt . Ratnasri

20. Shri M. Surya Naik

21 . Smt . S. Radha Balasubramanyam

22. Shri A.V. Ramana

23. Shri G. Chandrasekhar

24. Shri M. Rama Rao

25. Shri Mandadi Udaya Kumar

26. Smt . K. Jyotsna

27. Shri Ananda Babu Srungarapati

28. Shri Shri Ram Yadav

29. Shri Modh . Yousufuddin (Y. R. Babu) 30. Smt. Narella Sarada

31. Smt. Srivara

32. Smt. Soudamani

33. Smt . Anuradha K. Raju

34. Shri J. C. Pavan Reddy

35. Smt . Saranya Loka Reddy

36. Dr. Yala Sonia Reddy

37 . Dr. Vaddepalli Krishna

38. Smt . T. Vijaya Lakshmi

39. Shri N. Shiva Ram

40. Smt . D. Vijaya Laxmi

41. Dr. V. Sitadevi

42. Shri . K. C. Sheker Reddy

43. Shri G. Radhuveer Singh Thakur

44. Dr. A Sudhakar Yadav

45. Shri B. Venkatrama Reddy

46. Shri P. Purushottam Reddy

47. Shri M. Manmohan Reddy

48. Smt . K. Shalini Ramesh Kumar

49. Shri Jonna Satyanarayana

50. Ms. Gudluru Venkata Aruna

51. Shri Pogaku Vishweshwer

52. Shri V. Narayana Rao

53. Shri Muppalla Govind Rao

54. Shri Katta Venkateswara Rao

55. Shri Pakkala Suri Babu

56. Shri K. Ramana Venkat

57. Shri B. Vishnu Vardhan Reddy

58. Shri P. Prajoth Reddy [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फॉल्गुन 14, 1926.

59. Smt . Manorama

60. Dr. ( Smt . ) Susheela

61. Shri P. Sarath Kumar

62. Smt . Sreemani M.

63 . Shri I. Tirumala Rao

64. Smt . Ch . Sobha Rani

65. Smt . Polavaram Kalyani

66. Smt . P. Anjani Devi

67. Shri Boola Prasad Samuel

68. Shri Y. Amarendhar Reddy

69. Shri A. Rajender

70. Shri Dokala Murali

71 . Shri Diddi Rambabu

72. Shri S. Harinath Reddy

73. Shri A. Vijay Kumar

74. Smt. Aparajita

75. Shri Sambasiva Rao Alla

76. Shri Jagadish Chandra Prasad

77. Shri Seetha Rama Raju

78. Smt . Namelikanti Suvaranalatha

79. Smt. Kousalya Suram

80. Smt . Deepika Reddy

81. Smt . E. Jaya Laxmi

82. Shri S. Gopal Reddy

83. Smt . Anantha Laxmi

84. Ms. Potta Bharati

85. Shri T. N. Viswambar

86. Smt . B. Vijaya Reddy

87. Shri J. Narsing Rao

88. Shri Potturi Ranga Rao .

[F. No. 809/3/2004 -F (C) ] P. P. NAIR, Desk Officer नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 727.-चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 7 और 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम, 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के चैन्नई सलाहकार पैनल को पुनर्गठन करती है तथा निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को दो वर्षों की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, तत्काल प्रभाव से उक्त पैनल के सदस्यों के रूप में नियुक्त करती है । यह अधिसूचना इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 4 फरवरी, 2004 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अधिक्रमण में है ।

1. श्री कविंगर

2. श्री राजेम एम . पी. नाथन

3. श्री सी. रत्नासामी

2013 4. श्रीमती एस. कथीजा शीरीन

5. सुश्री एस. जोतिमणि

6. सुश्री ए. गिरिजा

7. श्री रामा नारायणन

8. श्री मुक्तावी. श्रीनिवासन

9. श्री ए.ए. जिन्नाह

10. श्रीत्यागराज

11. श्रीमती एम. सरोजा

12. श्री ई . वी. राजन

13. श्री कायल दिनाकरन

14. श्री सा. गणेशन

15. श्री एस. कन्नाप्पन

16. श्री कू.का. सेल्वम

17. श्री ए. कामराज ( नक्कीरन )

18. श्रीमती निर्मला सुरेश

19. सुश्री जयश्री सुन्दर

20. श्री गुना सेखरन

21 . प्रो. एम.पी. बालसुब्रमण्यम

22. डॉ. निर्मला सुरेश

23. श्री मू. मेहता

24. श्री पी. वी. कल्याणसुंदरम

25. श्री अल्ताफ हुसैन

26. प्रो. डॉ. इरोड तमिलनबन

27. श्री एस. अब्दुल रहमान

28. श्री एस. त्यागु

29. श्री के. स्वर्णम

30. श्री आर. श्रीनिवासन

31. श्री पूची एस. मुरूगन

32. श्रीमती वसंतीस्टेनले

33. डॉ. नल्ली कुप्पुस्वामी चेट्टियार

34. श्रीमती गीता लक्ष्मी

35. श्री पी. एन. राजेन्द्रन

36. श्री वेंकटचलम थायाबन

37. श्री एस. मुथुकृष्णन

38. श्रीबी. सेल्वंन

39. श्री आर. एल. कन्नन

40. श्री एच. एम. मुस्तफा

41. श्री अरूल अनबरासु

42. श्री ए. एस. टी. जयारमन ।

[फा. सं . 809/4/2004- एफ( सी ) ] पी. पी. नायर, डेस्क अधिकारी 2014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

New Delhi , the 5th February, 2005

S. O. 727. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952) read with rule 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules , 1983 the Central Government is pleased to reconstitute the Chennai advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification and to appoint the following persons as members of the said panel with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is earlier. This supersedes this Ministry's notification of even number dated 4th February, 2004.

1 . Shri Kavingar

2. Shri Rajem M.P. Nathan

3 Shri C. Rathnasamy

4. Sint . S. Katheeja Sheereen

5. Ms. S. Jothimani

6. Ms. A. Girija

7. Shri Rama Narayanan

8. Shri Muktha V. Srinivasan

9. Shri A. A. Jinnah

10. Shri Thiyagaraja

11 . Smt . M. Saroja

12. Shri E. V. Rajan

13 Shri Kayal Dinakaran

14. Shri Sa. Ganesan

15. Shri S. Kannappan

16 . Shri Ku . Ka . Selvam

17. Shri A. Kamraj (Nakkeran)

18. Smt . Nirmala Suresh

19. Ms. Jayashree Sundar

20. Shri Guna Sekaran

21 . Prof. M. P. Balasubramaniyan

22. Dr. Nirmal Suresh

23. Shri Mu . Metha

24. Shri P. V. Kalyansundaram

25. Shri AlthafHussain

26. Prof. Dr. Erode Tamilanban

27. Shri S. Abdul Rahman

28. Shri S. Thiyagu

29. Shri K. Swarnam

30. Shri R. Srinivasan

31. Shri Poochi S. Murugan

32. Smt. Vasanthi Stanley

33. Dr. Nalli Kuppuswami Chettiar

34. Mrs. Geetha Lakshmi

35. Shri P.N. Rajendran

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( i )] 36. Shri Venkatachalam Thayanban

37. Shri S. Muthukrishnan

38 . Shri B. Selvan

39 . Shri R. L. Kannan

40. Shri H. M. Musthafa

41 . Shri Arul Anbarasu

42. Shri A.S.T. Jayaraman .

[ F. No. 809/4/ 2004 -F( C) ] PP. NAIR, Desk Officer स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यविभाग ) (पी ०एम० एस० अनुभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 728.- दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् के साथ परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: -

2. डॉ. एम ० जी० आर ० मेडिकल विश्वविद्यालय, टी. एन. चेन्नई के संबंध में दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं० 34 के सामने कालम 2 एवं 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी:

XI. वी ०एम ०एस ० डेंटल कालेज, सेलम

(i) मास्टर ऑफ डेंटल सर्जरी - एम.डी. एस. ( ओरल सर्जरी ) ओरल सर्जरी (यदि 21 अक्तूबर, 2003 को टी.एन. डॉ. एम.जी.आर. मेडिकल यूनिवर्सिटी, चेन्नई अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो) -आर्थोडोंटिक्स एम.डी.एस. ( आर्थोडोंटिक्स )

1 ( यदि 21 अक्तूबर, 2003 को अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान टी.एन. डॉ. एम.जी.आर. मेडिकल यूनिवर्सिटी, चेन्नई की गई हो)

-प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स ( यदि 21 अक्तूबर, 2003 को अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान एम.डी.एस. ( प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स) टी.एन. डॉ. एम.जी.आर. मेडिकल यूनिवर्सिटी, चेन्नई कीगई हो) -पेरिओडोंटिक्स एम.डी.एस. ( पेरिओडोंटिक्स) (यदि27 अप्रैल, 2004 को अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान टी.एन. डॉ. एम.जी.आर. मेडिकल यूनिवर्सिटी, चेन्नई कीगई हो

[सं० वी०-12017/19/1997 - पी ० एम ० एस ० ] ए० के० सिंह. अवर सचिव

t [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/ फाल्गुन 14, 1926

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health)

(P.M.S. SECTION) New Delhi , the 16th February , 2005

S.O. 728. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of1948) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-:

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 34 , in Part -I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, T. N. Chennai the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :--

XI . V.M.S. Dental College , Salem

(i) Master of Dental Surgery

M.D.S. (Oral Surgery) The T.N. Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai.

-Oral Surgery (ifgranted on or after 21stOctober , 2003)

M.D.S. (Orthodontics) The T.N. Dr. MGRMedical University, Chennai . M.D.S. (Prosthodontics) -Orthodontics (ifgranted on or after 21st October, 2003) -Prosthodontics (ifgranted on or after 21stOctober, 2003)

The T.N. Dr. M.G.R.Medical University, Chennai .

-Periodontics (ifgranted on or after 27thApril, 2004)

M.D.S. (Periodontics) The T.N. Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai .

[No. V- 12017/19/ 97 -PMS] A. K. SINGH , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 729.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु मिनेसोटा यूनिवर्सिटी, यू.एस.ए. द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;

और, डा० डी० जोंग ब्रूस एडवर्ड, अमेरिकी नागरिक, जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है , ए.एच.एम. ट्रस्ट, अनुराधाक्लिनिक, बी. धर्माथुपट्टी, वोदिनायकानुर (टी.के. ) थेनी ( जिला ) तमिलनाडु- 625582 से धर्मार्थ ( चैरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु, जुड़े हैं;

अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा० डी० जोंग ब्रूस एडवर्ड द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधि: -

क. 1 दिसम्बर, 2004 से आगे छह माह की अवधि; अथवा ख. उस अवधि जिसके दौरान डा० डी० जोंग ब्रूस एडवर्ड ए.एच.एम. ट्रस्ट, अनुराधाक्लिनिक, बी धर्माथुपट्टी, वोदिनायकानुर

2015 (टी.के. ) थेनी ( जिला ) तमिलनाडु-625582 से जुड़े हैं, इनमें से जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी ।

[सं० वी.- 11016/1/2004 - एम ० ई ० (नीति- I ) ] पी० जी० कलाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th February, 2005

S. O. 729. Whereas medical qualification Doctor of Medicine granted by the University of Minnesota , USA , is a recognized medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act;

And whereas Dr. De Jong Bruce Edward, American national , who possess the said qualification is attached to A.H.M. Trust , Anuradha Clinic, B. Dharmathupatti , Bodinayakanur (T.K. ) Theni (Dt . ).Tamilnadu -625582 for charitablework and not for personal gain;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. De Jong Bruce Edward in India shall be limited to:

(a) a period of six months from 1st December, 2004 onward; or

(b) the periodduring which Dr. De Jong Bruce Edward isattached to A.H.M. Trust, Anuradha Clinic , B. Dharmathupatti , Bodinayakanur (T.K. ) Theni (Dt. ) Tamilnadu -625582 whichever is shorter .

[No. V- 11016/ 1/2004- ME (Policy - I) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 730.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में के.वि.डि.ऐ. सेके.वि.ऐ.डि. 1 /C तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतदुपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ;

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) , अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है;

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग, निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग , राजमुन्द्रि एसट/के.जी. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी. सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमुन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना कीतारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत । 2016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाईन: के.वी.डी.ए. सेके.वि.ऐ.डी. राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: साखी नेतिपल्ली

गांव: अंतर्वेदि जिले: पूर्व गोदावरी

हेक्टेयर्स एर्स सेंन्टेएर्स एकड़ आर. एस . नं.

सेन्ट्स

5 1

0 0

04 680/2A

680/2B

()

05 (0

06 682/ 1A

05 682/ 1B

0 ()

05 682/ 1C

()

0 682/2A

02 0

0 682/2B

04 682/2C

25 682/1A

0 684/3 A

()

(0)

0 683/ 1B

0 684/3B

()

(0)

0 684/3D

06 684/3E

(0)

()

04 684/4A

01 ()

Total

[सं. ओ-12016/1/2005-ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 730.- Whereas it appears to the Central Governinent that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from KVDA to KVAD1 /Cin the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural GasCorporation Ltd.;

Andwhereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed here- to:

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land Act ) , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land inay object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . Basin , Godavari Bhavan, Base Complex, Rajahmundry. Andhra Pradesh.

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] And every person inaking such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in person or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU Flow Line from KVDA TO KVAD State : Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Sakhinetipalli District: East Godavari

Village: Antervedi R.S. No.

Ares Centiares Acres Cents Hectares

6 2

04 680/2A

680/2B

682/1A

06 0

()

682/ 1B

()

05 682/ 1C

(0)

682/2A

02 0

682/2B

()

04 682/2C

()

25 0

682/1 A

(0)

()

684/3A

03 0

683/1B

(0 684/3B

684/3D

684/3E

()

04 684/4A

Total

[No. O. - 12016/ 1/ 2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 731.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में के.वी.ऐ.डी. से मोरी ई.पी.एस. तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एत‌द्याबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ;

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) , अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोपित किया है;

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग, राजमुन्द्रि एसट/के. जी. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन , राजमुन्द्रि , आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा। और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत । [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/ फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाइन : के.वी.ए.डी. से मोरी ई.पी.एस राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: सखिनेतिपल्लि

गांव: अंतर्वेदि जिला: पूरब गोदावरी

हेक्टेयर्स एर्स सेंन्टेएर्स एक्रर्स सेन्टस आर. एस. नं.

6 1

0 668/1B

04/2 668/6C

0 668/2B

09 0

668/3B

0 668/4B

03 668/5B

04 0

668/6B

0 03 0

0 668/10B/ 1

0 668/10B/2 0

042

668/10C

07 0

668/14B

0 668/14C

24 667/ 1PT

07/2 667/3

0 0

02 667/2

0 072 667/4

06 0

667/5

042 667/6

06 0

0 667/7

0 667/8

07 667/9

05 0

0 667/11

15 667/19

667/10

0 0

072 667/12

0 667/13

04 0

667/18

03 667/17

0 667/14

042 0

07 667/16

0 667/15

042 0

0 667/20/20

0 667/2 21

06 TOTAAL

539/11VIB

0 04/2

0 539/10

05 0

539/19/ 1D

539/10IE

0 539/ 1F

01 0

07 539/4E

2017 2

6 1

0 539/4C

11/2 0

540/4B

05 0

539/4D

13 0

04 540/4C

0 539/4E

052 0

0 540/1B

052 0

0 540/7B

05 0

05 540/ 1C

540/ 1E

04 0

540/ 1D

0 0

540/3B

05 540/6B

540/8C

05 0

540/3C

0 540/8B

04/2 0

542/6B

0 0

542/6C

09 0

0 542/6D, 7A

042 0

0 542/7C , 10B

07/2 0

542/7B

05 0

0 553/ 1A2

20 0

0 553/ 2A2

172 0

553/ 1A2

0 0

0 554/ 1A2

11/2 0

554/1A3

112 0

554/2B

13 0

0 554/2C

557/3A/H 0

10 0

557/3A/G

554/2D

06/2 0

556/3B

08 0

556/3C

15 557/3 A

03 0

557/3A.1E

557/3AH

0 0

092 557/3 AC

072 0

557/3A/B

12 558/2

0 022 0

558/3

002 570/2C

0 0

558/4

05 0

570/ 1D

072

570/2b

23 570/3b

0 558/5

06 0

14 569/1bp 2018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

6 0

569/lc

(0)

11 570/ 1b pt

()

502/5B

(04

11 570/ 1C

0 072 502/ 1C

04 0

502/ 1B

0 502/ 1D

10 (0)

392/51

13 0

39 502/ 1A

0 500/2A

02 0

498/20D

07 500/2B

0 494/11 PT

0 0

01 ()

0 494/12PT

24 0

392/ 5E

06 500/2C

(0 500/2D

06 0

500/2E

02 499/3B

07 (0

499/3A

02 (0)

499/9PT

04 499/8PT

10 0

393/ 1B

09 0

393 /2A

11 499/7

0 499/4C

10 0

499/4D PT

()

03 0

499/12

10 ()

499/13

01 399/2C

0 022

399/3B

06 399/5A

17 0

0 399/4A

392/ 5H

0 222

499/4B

()

499/ 11PT 0

10 498/20D

07 (0

0 498/20B

24 495/7 PT

08 (0)

() 495/15 PT

0 (0

01 356/ 1A

498/ 20A

495/6

495/14

002 (0

()

04 357 / 1A

390/8B

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1

393/2D, 3A 0

()

09 0

393/2B

092

499/10

002 (0

()

393 / 1A

02 0

()

392/5A

072 392/5C

11 392/5L

10 ()

392/5B

19 392/5D

392/ 5F

()

07 0

()

392/5G

07 0

392/5J

06 0

392/5K

072

()

390/ 1B

02 390/ 2A

004

04 390/5B

390/5C

()

05 390/6B

390/4C

()

03 0

20 390/9A

390/9B

()

390/4B

03 0

390/4D

()

420/PT

Total

10 922 [सं. ओ-12016/2/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. मी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2005

S.O. 731. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that forthe transport of petroleum from KVAD to MORI EPS in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural GasCorporation Ltd.

And Whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here- to :

Now Therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users ) in the land Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the saıd land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . , Basin . Godavarı Bhavan. Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2019

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wished to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : KVAD TO MORI EPS State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Sakhinetipalli District: East Godavari

Village: Antervedi R.S. No.

Cents Hectares Areas Centi Ares Acres 1

668/1B

042 668/6C

0 668/2B 0

668/3B

0 668/4B

04 668/5B 0

668/6B

668/10B/ 1 0

042 668/10B/2 0

0 668/10C

0 668/14B 0

0 668/14C

667/1PT

07/2

667/3

0 667/2

072 0

0 667/4

0 667/5

04/2

0 667/6

06 0

07 667/8

67/9

15 667/10

04 539/ 1E

0 539/1F

07 0

539/4E

0 0

539/4C

11/2 0

05 540/4B

0 0

539/4D

540/4C

04 0

0 539/4E

052

540/1B

540/7B

0 540/ 1C

04 $40/ 1E

05 540/1D

06 540/3B

0 540/6B

05 540/8C

0 540/3C

540/8B

042 0

05 542/6B

0 542/6C

0 0

542/6D, 7A

04/2

0 0

072 542/7C, 10B

542/7B

0 553/1A2

20 0

0 553/2A2

172

18 553/1A2 0

0 0

0 554/1A2

11/2 0

0 554/1A3

112

554/2B

0 554/2C

10 557/3A/H 0

0 072

0 667/12

04 0

667/13

667/18

0 0

03 0

667/17

03 667/14

0 042 0

07 667/16

0 667/15

042

0 667/20

02 0

0 667/21

TOTAL

18 Village : Kesavadusupalem

0 539/1B

04/2

04 539/1C

05 539/1D

56562/05-4

08 557/3A/G 0

06/2 554/2D

556/3B

556/3C

03 557/3A 0

10 557/3A, 1E 0

557/3AH 0

09/2

0 557/3AC 0

072

0 0

12 557/3A/B

022 558/2

0 558/3

00½

0 0

18 570/2C

0 0

558/4

0 570/1D

072

15 570/26

06 2020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

5 0

570/3b

23 0

558/5

06 0

14 569/ 1bp

0 569/ 1c

11 570/1b pt

502/5B

570/ 1C

0 07/2 502/ 1C

04 502/ 1B

05 502/ 1D

10 392/51

13 0

39 502/ 1A

500 /2A

02 498/20D

07 0

0 500/2B

0 494/11 PT

494/12PT 0

24 0

392/5E

09 0

500/2C.

06 0

500/2D

06 0

0 500/2E

07 499/3B

499/3A

02 0

0 499/9PT

499/8PT

0 0

09 393/1B

0 0

393 /2A

499/7

499/4C

499/4D PT 0

499/12

0 499/13

0 399/2C

02/2 0

40 399/3B

399/5A

17 399/4A 0

392/5H

0 222 0

0 499/4B

499/ 11PT 0

10 0

498/20D

07 0

498/20B

0 0

24 495/7 PT

495/15 PT 0

08 0

356/1A

0 498/20A 0

02 495/6

(

495/14

002

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( i) ]

6 0

357/1A

04 0

03 390/8B

09 393/2D, 3A

393/2B

0 09/2 0

499/10

002

393/1A

392/5A

072

392/5C

392/5L

10 0

392/5B

19 392/5D

07 392/5F

392/5G

06 392/5J

392/5K

072 0

390/ 1B

02 0

10 390/2A

04 390/5B

390/5C

03 0

390/6B

03 390/4C

20 390/9A

15 390/9B

390/4B

390/4D

76 420/PT

TOTAL

10 922

[No. O- 12016/2/ 2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 732.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में मंडपेटा-22 से मंडपेटा-11 आई /सी से मंडपेटा 16 तक पैट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतद् आबद्द अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है;

4 अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोपित किया है;

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजामुन्द्री एसट/के. जी. बेसिन , ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरि भवन, राजामुन्द्री , आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । 2021 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या वह यह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूपसे हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent: Authority Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin, Godavari Bhavan, Base complex , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh.

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाइन मंडपेटा 22 से मंडपेटा-11 आई/सी

सेमंडपेटा-16

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

मंडल: मंडपेटा

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

गांव: अंगरा

जिले: पूर्व गोदावरी

ROU FLOW- LINE FROM MANDAPETA-22.TO MANDAPETA 11 I/ C TO MANDAPETA - 16

State: Andhra Pradesh

हेक्टेयर

Mandal: Mandapeta आर. एस. नं.

सेंन्टेएर्स एकर्स सेंदूस

एर्स

District: EastGodavari

Village:Angara 1

R.S. No.

Ares

Cents

Hectares

Centiares Acres 0

153/ 1Pt

5 5

154/2Pt

153/ 1Pt

155/5Pt

154/2Pt

06 0

155/6Pt

155/5Pt

09 0

155/6B

155/6Pt

20 0

155/7Pt .0

155/6B

0 5

12 155/ 8Pt

155/7Pt

10 0

155/9Pt

155/ 8Pt

155/10Pt

155/9Pt

176/2A

155/ 10Pt

200/1

176/2A

0 06

197/1A 0

200/1

60 05

197/1B

197/ 1A

15 0

197/2A

197/ 1B

14 26

176/3

197/2A

14 0

177/2

176/3

183/2A

0 .09

177/2

Total

183 /2A

[सं. ओ -12016/3/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

Total

18.

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव

[No. O. - 12016/3 /2005 -ONGD - IV] New Delhi, the 23rd February, 2005

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy,

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 733.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में के.वि.ऐ.सि. से के.वि.ऐ.ऐ. तक पैट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

S.O. 732. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " MANDAPETA - 22 TO MANDAPETA - 11 I/ C TO MANDAPETA - 16" in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil and Natural GasCorporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto ;

अतः अब पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है;

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any persori interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification,

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछोने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग, निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजाहमुन्द्रि एसट के.जी.बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, सजाहामुन्द्रि आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । 2022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या वह यह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाइन: के.वि.ए.सि. से के.वि.ए.ए. राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: सकिनेटिपल्लि

गांव: अंतर्वेदि जिला: पूर्वगोदावरी

आर. एस . नं. हेक्टेयरस एर्स सेंन्टीएर्स एकड़ सेन्दूस 2

5 0

12 887/ 1A2 pts

20 887/ 1BPt

884/P

0 022 0

883/P

02 0

0 849/2Pt

072

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

5 0

/1B3

19 0

1B4

728/1

0 29 0

728/2

192 0

727/ 1A

0 262 725/6C

0 032 727/1B

08 0

727/ 1C

726/3

11 0

726/4A

08 726/4Bpt

726/12

042 726/14

10 726/15,18,19 0

0 849/3 Pt 0

03/2 0

0 847/1

02 849/9 Pt , 3 Pt 0

849/9Pt

04 0

0 849/10 Pt

0 0

01 849/10Bpt

04 849/13 Pt

03 849/17F

07 849/14 pt

0 849/17C

20 849/15

0 0

03 849/17 pt

0 01½ 849/17Bpt

01 849/ 17E

03 849/17D

25 850/5B

0 581/ 1A

082

0 848/ 1A

04 0

848/ 1B1

0 851/1B

092

848/ 1B2

19 848/3pt 0

05 847/6

0 847/2

102

847/3

072

0 847/5

10½

0 0

847/4

847/7

0 0

847/8

11/2

05 0

846/ 1A1

846/ 1A2A 0

02.

846/1A2pt 0

082 846/ 1B1pt 0

14 725/2A

725/ 1A

09 725/6B

725/6A

052

749/1A

12 749/1B

06 749/10

06 0

749/1D

0 062 0

749/ 1E

062 0

749/ 1F

0 152 Total

70 [सं. ओ-12016/4/2005-ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 733. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from KVAC to KVAA in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas CorporationLtd.;

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto ;

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . , Basin . Godavari Bhavan . Base Complex , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2023

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM KVAC TO KVAA State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Sakhinetipalli District: EastGodavari

Village:Antervedi R.S. No.

Ares Centi Ares Acres Cents Hectares

12 887/1A2 pts

20 887/ 1B Pt 0

884/P

022 0

883/P

072 849/2 Pt

0 849/3 Pt

03/2

847/1

02 849/9 Pt , 3 Pt 0

849/9Pt

04 849/10 Pt

01 849/10Bpt

04 849/13 Pt

0 0

849/17F

03 0

07 849/14pt

0 849/17C

0 849/15

03 849/17 pt

0 0

012 849/17Bpt

849/17 E

03 849/17D 0

850/5B

25 581/ 1A

0812 848/ 1A

07 0

848/ 1B1

04 851/1B

092

0 848/ 1B2 0

19 848/3pt 0

847/6

05 0

847/2

10/2 847/3

0 072 847/5

10/2 847/4

05 8477

12 0

847/8

0 11/2 0

0 846/ 1A1

05 846/ 1A2A 0

25 846/1A2pt 0

0 082 846/ 1B1pt 0

846/1B3

19 846/1B4

0 728/1

6 1

0 0

728/2

192

727/ 1A

262

725/6C

03/2

727/ 1B

08 0

07 727/1C

0 0

11 726/3

09 726/4A

08 726/4Bpt

0 726/12

04/2 0

726/14

726/ 15,18,19 0

10 0

725/2A

14 0

725/ 1A

09 0

725/6B

18 725/6A

0 052 749/ 1A

12 0

749/1B

06 0

749/1C

06 749/1D

06/2 0

0 749/1E

06/2 0

749/ 1F

0 152 2

70 Total

[No. O. - 12016/4/2005 -ONGD- IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 734.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में पी.एस.ऐ.ओ से पाशर्लपूडी 12½ तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतदपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग, निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग, के. जी. प्रोजक्ट, राजामुंद्री- 533103 को इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा।

0 292

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत । 2024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाईपलाईन: पि.एस.ऐ.ओ. से पाशर्लपूडी 12½ राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: मामिडिरू जिले: पूरब गोदावरी

गांव : पार्शलपुड़ी आर . एस. नं. हेक्टेयर्स एर्स सेंन्टेएस एकर्स सेंन्टस 401/2D

01 401/2F

0 0

03.5 401/4C

0 0

07 0

401/5B

05 0

401/61

07.5

Total

24 [सं. ओ -12016/5/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 734. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from PSAO to Pasplapudi 12½ in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

Andwhereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to:-

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 735.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में पि.एस.ऐ.के से ऐनुगुपल्लि 2 तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतदपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्धकोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग, के. जी. प्रोजक्ट, राजामुंद्री- 533103 को इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा।

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाईपलाईन: पि.स.ए.के से एनुगुपल्लि राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: मामिदिकुदुरू जिले: पूरब गोदावरी

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein :

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , K. P. project , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wished to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM PSAO TO PASARLAPUDI 12 I/ C

State: Andhra Pradesh District: East Godavari

Mandal : Mamidikuduru Village: Pasarlapudi

Centiares Acres R.S. No.

Ares

Cents Hectares

01 401/2D

0 0

03.5

0 401/2F

0 0

07 401/4C

05 401/5B

07.5

401/61

0 Total

[No. O. - 12016/5/2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

गांव: पाशर्लपूढ़ि आर. एस. नं. हेक्टार्स एर्स सेंन्टेएर्स एक्रर्स सेंन्टस

6 1

115/3B1

39 115/3A1

14 115/ 1A

36/ 1B

10 0

35/5

08 35/6

35/4

10 0

35/3

11 35/1

35/2

11 0

33/ 1C

11 0

08 33/1D

12 33/1B

21 32/ 1C

32/ 1A

32/ 1B

10 32/ 1A

04 0

25/2pt

25/1 A

07 0

10/ 1A-2A [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2025

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14, 1926

6 2

0 0

04 10/8A

07 16/ 1A, 2A 0

16/8A; 18/1 0

16/1A, 2A7A 0

0 18/1

07 18/ 1A, 2A, 8A 0

04 18/8pt

07 16/ 1a, 2a

04 18/1

28 Total

[सं. ओ -12016/6/2005-ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 735. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from PSAK to Enugupalli - 2 in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here- to:-

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , K. P. Project , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM PSAK TO ENUGUPALLI- 2 State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal : Mamidikuduru District:East Godavari

Village: Pasarlapudi R.S. No. Hectares Ares Centiares Acres Cents

6 1

0 115/3B1

15 0

(0)

39 115/3A1

14 115/ 1A

0 :

36/1B

10 35/5

0 .

()

35/6

35/4

09 (0

10 35/3

5 1

35/1

11 0

0 35/2

11 33/1C

0 0

33/1D

12 33/ 1B

0 32/ 1C

0 32/ 1A

19 32/ 1B

32/ 1A

10 0

0 25/2pt

42 0

0 25/1A

07 0

0 10/1A- 2A

0 10/8A

07 16/1A, 2A 0

04 16/8A; 18/1 0

07 16/ 1A, 2A.7A 0

04 18/1

0 18/ 1A, 2A, 8A 0

(0)

04 18/8pt

16/ la, 2a

18/1

3 Total

[No. O. - 12016/6/2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 736.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में पी.यस.ऐ.एल से पासर्लपूढ़ी-8 ई.पी.यस. तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतद‌अबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के. जि. बेसिन , ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरि भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि , आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत । 2026

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] गांव: अल्लवरम

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यु. पाईपलाईन: पि.यस.ए. यल सेपार्शलपूडि राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: अल्लावरम जिले: पूर्व गोदावरी

गांव: गुदाला आर . एस. नं. हेक्टार्स एर्स सेंन्टेएर्स एक्रर्स सेंन्टस 1

0 188/2A

02 188/2B

11 0

188/2C

07 1

6 0

64 87/2P

10 87/3A

0 0

87/ 1A

04 88/4

24 0

Total

08 गांव : बोदसकुरू

285/1D

005 0

285/1C

25 0

285/1B

27 285/ 1A

16 283/1P

03 0

280/3A

03 0

0 280/3B

06 280/4P

08 280/5P

280/6P

10 (0

280/8P

03 280/7P

274/9P

23 274/8P

32 272/ 1P

35 255/4P

13 255/6P

18 255/ IP

05 254/1P

05 254/2P

0 254/3P

01 257/ 8AP

04 257/8BP

01 (0)

246/3B

04 246/3A

07 254/5P

005 0

246/3B

04 0

246/4P

015

246/1B 0

02 246/1A

29 0

246/2AP

12 246/ 5AP

05 244/9P

16 0

244/8P

15 264/4C1

03 264/4C2

08 1

Total

982 311/4P

63 0

311/3P

33 0

311/2P

02 0

310/3A

03 0

310/2P

03 0

313/2B

19 0

313 /2A

39 313/ 1P

(0)

21 304/4A2P 0

22 304/2P

20 307/7D

16 303/7C

11 0

303/7A

03 303/7B

05 302/8B

11 302/8A

302/10P

()

0 302/7B

15 302/6P

01 1

Total

01 [सं . ओ -12016/7/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005

S.O. 736. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from PSAL to PASARLAPUDI - 8 in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to:-

Now therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of theSection 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of right ofUsers in the [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2027

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , RAJAHMUNDRY ASSET/ K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan, Base Complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wished to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM PSAL TO PASARLAPUDI #8 State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Allavaram District : East Godavari

Village: Gudala R.S. No. Hectares Ares Centireas Acres Cents 2

6 188/2A

()

02 188/2B

0 ()

07 188/2C

()

005 285/ 1D

()

25 285/1C

285/ 1B

()

27 (0)

285/ 1A

0 283/1P

(0 ()

03 0

(0 280/3 A

06 280/3B

(0)

280/4P

08- 280/5P

03 (0)

(0 280/ 6P

280/8P

()

03 (0)

280/7P

()

23 ()

274/9P

32 (0

274/ 8P

0 272/ 1P

()

35 255/4P

()

13 255/6P

18 255/ 1P

254/ 1P

()

05 ()

04 254/2P

0 (0

(0 254/3P

01 257/ 8AP

(0)

(01

(0)

04 257/8BP

01 (0)

04 246/3B

(0)

246/3 A

005

0 254/5P

04 246/3B

()

56562/05-5

246/4P

015

02 246/1B

29 246/ 1A

12 0

246/2AP

246/5AP

16 244/9P

15 244/8P

264/4C1

(0)

()

08 0

264/4C2

Total

952 Village: Allavaram

83/3

()

87/2P

()

10 0

06 87/3A

04 87/ 1A

88/4

24 0

08 Total

Village:Bodarakurru

311/4P

()

33 0

311/3P

02 0

311/2P

03 310/3A

310/2P

(0)

03 (0

()

19 313/2B

()

39 313 /2A

(0)

21 313/ 1P

304/4A2P

22 0

20 304/2P

307/7D

16 0

11 303/7C

03 303 /7A

()

303/7B

11 .

302/8B

302/8A

06 (0

302/10P

302/7B

01 302/6P

Total

[No. O- 12016/7/ 2005 -ONGD - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

2028

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली , 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 737.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में पासलेपूढ़ी 27 से पासर्लपूढ़ी 1 I/C ई.पी.एस. तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतद्‌द्याद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग , राजामुन्दरी एसट/ के.जी. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या वह यह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाइन : पासर्लपूढि 27 से पासर्लपूढि 1 IVC राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश मण्डल: मामिडिकुदुरु जिला: पूर्व गोदावरि गांव : पासर्लपूढि

सेंन्टस आर . एस. नं. हेक्ट. एर्स सेंन्टेएर्स एक्रर्स 1

6 0

15 101/ 1B

35 140/3B

0 0

0 140/2B

0 0

140/1B, 4B

0 (0

08 141/1F2

04 139/2

138/3B2

16 141/ 1D2 0

141/1E2

14 0

Total

51 [सं. ओ-12016/8/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 737. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from Pasarlapudi- 27 to Pasarlapudi - 1 I/C in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Andwhereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in

PART 11-S 3 ( 1 ) | the land described in the schedule annexed here- to:-

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) . the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification . to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G .. Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in persons or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : PASARLAPUDI 27 TO PASARLAPUDI 11 / c

State: Andhra Pradesh District: East Godavari

Mandal. Mamidikuduru Village Pasarlapudi

Centiares Acres Cents R.S. No. Hectares Ares

5 1

() 101/ IB

()

35 ()

140/3B

()

20 140/2B

()

0 140/ 1B ,4B

06 0

141/ 1F2

004 139/2

() 0

21 138/3B2

()

16 141/ 1D2

()

14 0

141// 1E2

51 0

Total

[No. O. -12016/ 8/ 2005 -ONGD -1V] NC ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 738- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में केसनपल्ली ( i )6 से केसनपल्लि ( i ) 2 तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतद्‌द्याबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) , अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग, राजमुन्दरी एसट/ 2029 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

के.जी. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमुन्दरी , आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

And every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wish to be heard in person orby legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : KESANAPALLI (W) 6 TO और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या वह यह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

KESANAPALLI (W) 2

अनुसूची

State: Andhra Pradesh Mandal : Malikipuram

District: East Godavari Village:Gollapalem आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाइन केसनपल्लि( पश्चिम ) 6 से केसनपल्लि( पश्चिम ) II

H/oKesanapalli राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

R.S. No.

मंडल: मलिकिपुरम

Hectares Ares Centiares Acres Cents गांव : गोगन्नमटम सिवरु कखका

5 जिला: पूर्व गोदावरी

568/2C1

10 सेंन्टेएर्स

सेंन्टस

एअर्स

हेक्टेर्स

एकड़

आर. एस. नं.

568/2D3

10 3

568/2C2

04 0

146/2

56/2D1

147/ 1B

568/2D2

447/1C

568/2D4

0 07

447/1D

568/2EP

450/5B

Total

Village: Karawaka H/o Gogannamatham

गांव: केसनापल्लिसिवरू गोल्ल पालेम

146/2

16 0

568/2C1

147/1B

568/2D3

447/ 1C

30 01

568/2C2

447/D

17 56/2D1

450/5B

568/2D2

Total

568/2D4

[No. O. - 12016/9/2005 -ONGD - IV] 0

568/2EP

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

Total

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

[सं. ओ -12016/9/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005

का.आ. 739.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में कैकुलूरू 12 से कैकुलूरू 11 तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । S.O. 738. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleumfrom Kesanapalli ( W) 6 to Kesanapalli ( W) 2 in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एत‌द्याबद अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto :--

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग, निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग, राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के.जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि , आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K . G. , Basin, Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

2030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यु. पाईपलाईन: कैकुलूर 12 से कैकुलूर-11 राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: कैकुलूर

गांव : राचपटनम

जिला: कृष्णज्ञ

सेन्टस

सेन्टेएर्स

हेक्टेर्स

आर . एस. नं.

एर्स

एकड़ 2

6 269/ 1B2C

08 0

()

05 269/ 1B2B

0 29/ 1B1

16 0

15 287/3B

(0)

298/ 1E2

08 298/ 1E3

()

() 02 1/2 288/3E

()

14 298 / 1E1

08 298/ 1Dp

(0)

04 288/3D

(0)

0 298/ 1C

00 1-2 ()

0712 288/ 3C2

()

288/3C1

0 07 1/2 (0

()

08 288/3B

11 288/3A.

(0 (0

15 287/3A

0 285/3Cp (0)

41 0

0 285/3B3

()

04 285/3A3

06 285/3B2 ()

22 285/3A2 ()

(0 285/3B1

11 0

(0 285/3A1

()

17 285/3Bp ()

()

21 285/2Ap (0)

18 Total

गांव : तामराकोल्ल

01 121/ 1B

(0 121 / IA

()

122/2C3

()

() 122/2C2

()

(0 (0

122/2C1

()

12 (0)

13 123/ 1C

()

04 122/2A

07 122/ 1B

()

123/ 1B

()

13 ()

()

122/ 1A

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

6 0

143/1E

(0)

143/1B

()

02 143/1C

()

143/1B

02 ()

143/ 1A

12 0

0 140/1D

140/1C

()

140/1B

3 0

()

140/1A

36 141/3P

()

01 151/6A

()

138/2

()

138/1

148/2Bp

148/2Ap

()

151/6B

(0)

151/ 1A

()

159/ 10Bp

159/9B4

004 159/9B3

159/9B2

()

0000000000

(04 (0

159/9B1

(04 0

()

159/8B2

04 ()

159/8B1

()

(0 ) 159/7p

()

07 ()

159/4B2

()

03 (0

159/3B

04 (0

()

159/4B1

(0)

(0 159/2B

()

(04 159/ 1B

16 0

(0)

174/1

()

20 (0

() 175/3A4

16 ()

0 175/3A3

()

175/3A2

()

(0)

()

175/3A1

45 (0)

()

179/3p

()

(0)

17 184/5Ap

()

17 194/2Ap

0 ()

()

08 184/4A2

()

184/ 1A1

()

11 184/2A1

00 ()

184/ 1A2

()

184/1A1

()

194/4Ap (0

(0 123/1A

(0)

004

194/3Ap (0

27 ()

123/3D

()

09 123/3C

()

21 123/3B

()

10 123/3A

142/P

(

()

( )

32 194/ 1A2

194/ 1A1

( )

196/6P

()

10 196/2C

()

000

196/7p [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2031

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

6 2

0 0

11 196/2B

0 0

12 196/2A

14 196/3p 0

0 214/3B

11 0

214/3A

17 214/2p 0

214/1p 0

212/ 1A

0 212/ 1C

81 0

212/ 1B

28 207/2p 0

33 207/1p

0 0

58 23/p

16 0

28/1p

12 29/5p

0 0

11 29/4p

29/ 3A1

13 0

0 29/ 3A2

01 29/3Bp 0

17 29/2A

0 29/2C

29/2B

0 29/1p 0

12 31/ 1A1 /p 0

13 31/1Cp

10 31 / 1A2p

13 Total

[सं. ओ-12016/10/2005-ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 739. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleumfrom KAIKALUR - 12 to KAIKALUR - 11 in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here- to :

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein :

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM KAIKALUR - 12 TO

KAIKALUR -11

State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Kaikalur District: Krishna

Village: Rachapatnam R.S. No. Hectares Ares Centiares Acres Cents 2

6 1

0 269/1B2C

08 0

05 269/ 1B2B

16 269/ 1B1

287/3B

0 298/ 1E2

298/ 1E3

35 0

288/3E

0 02 1/2 0

298/ 1E1

14 0

08 298/ 1Dp

288/3D

298/ 1C

0 00 1/2 0

288/3C2

0 07 1/2 0

0 288/3C1

07 1/2 0

288/3B

08 0

0 288/3A

11 0

287/3A

15 0

08 285/3Cp

285/3B3

()

41 0

285/3A3

04 0

285/3B2

06 0

285/3A2

22 0

285/3B1

11 0

285/3A1

23 0

285/3Bp

000

21 285/2Ap 0

Total

18 Village: Tamarakollu

121/ 1B

0 0

03 121/ 1A

0 122/2C3

04 0

0 122/ 2C2

05 122/2C1

12 0

123/ 1C

13 0

122/ 2A

(0 122/B

(07 0

13 123/ 1B

122/1A

123/ 1A

123/3D

27 123/3C

0 123/3B

000

()

123/3A

10 2032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

6 0

54 142/p

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( 1) ] 1

10 196/7p 0

143/ 1E

15 143/1B

02 143/ 1C

02 143/1B

02 143/1A

0 140/ 1D

()

20 140/ 1C

()

0 140/ IB

03 (0)

()

140/1A

02 0

141/3P

36 (0

151/6A

01 138/2

(0)

47 138/1

()

30 ()

()

24 148/2Bp

33 148/2Ap (0

()

151/6B

151/ 1A (0

27 (0)

()

05 159/10Bp

159/9B4

()

(01

159/9B3

04 (0

159/9B2

04 ()

159/9B1

04 (0

159/882

()

() 159/8B1

()

09 159/7p 0

()

159/4B2

(0)

07 ()

159/3B

03 ()

159/4B1

()

04 ()

() 159/2B

(01

()

03 ()

159/18

(0)

04 174/1

()

() 175/3A4 ()

20 (0)

(0 175/ 3A3

()

() 175/ 1A2

15 ()

175/ 3A1

()

15 (0

()

45 179/3p

() ()

()

17 184/5Ap

()

17 194/2Ap

()

184/4A2

()

() 184/ 1A1 (0)

08 ( )

184/2A1

()

() 184/ 1A2 ()

(09 ()

()

07 184/ JA1

()

27 ()

194/4Ap

()

10 194/3 Ap

()

194/ 1A2

()

32 ()

(0)

194/ 1A1

()

() 196/6P

()

() 196/2C

004

10 0

0 196/2B

11 0

()

196/2A

12 0

14 196/3p

() 214/3B

11 0

()

(0) 214/3A

0 ()

17 214/2p

()

30 214/ 1p

212/ 1A

(0)

212/ 1C

81 0

()

212/ 1B

()

12 0

()

28 207/2p

33 207/1p

(0 23/p

86 58 16 28/ 1p

()

12 29/5p

()

11 29/4p

()

(0)

13 29/3A1

29/3A2

()

11 ()

01 29/3Bp

()

29/ 2A

(0)

17 ()

29/2C

()

06 (0

29/2B

(01

()

04 (0)

()

29/1p

(0 (0)

()

12 31/ 1A1 /p

()

13 31/ 1Cp

()

10 31/1A2p

13 Total

[No. O - 12016/ 10 / 2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 740.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में के.एस.पी. 1 ई.पी.एस. ( जी.एस. - 15 /23 ) से सी शोरे तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतदुपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन , अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14, 1926

Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin . Godavari Bhavan , Basc complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wished to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

आर.ओ.यु. पाइप लाइन: के.एस.पी. 1 ई.पी.एस -

SCHEDULE

(जी.एस. - 15/23 ) से सी शोर

ROU FLOW LINE FROM KSP 1 EPS- ( GS 15/23 ) ΤΟ मंडल: अल्लवरम

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

SEA SHORE

जिले: पूर्वगोदावरि

गांव: वोडलरेवु

Mandal Allavaram

State: Andhra Pradesh

सेन्टस

सेन्टेएर्स एकर्स

हेक्टेयर्स एर्स

एस. नं.

आर .

District: East Godavari

Village: Odalarevu 4

R.S. No. Hectares Arcs Centiares Acres Cents 5

949/1B12

949/1B13

()

949/1B12

949/2pt

()

949/1B13

947/ 1A

()

949/2pt

947 / 1B, 2A 0

947/ 1A

947/2B10

(0)

947 / 1B, 2A

939/1pt

0 5

05 24

939/2A

947/2B10

99 0

939/2B

939/ 1pt

939/2C

()

939/2A

940/1A

939/2B

()

70 0

940/ 1B, 2A 0

()

939/2C

()

() 940/2A, 941 / pt 0 51

9401A

42 0

941/2pt

()

940/ 1B.2A 0

27 4

1 13

TOTAL

940/2A, 941 / pt (0

941/2pt

गांव: कोमरगिरिपटनम

TOTAL

10 0

1033 /1C

Village:Komaragiripatnam

1033/1D

1033 /1C

1033/2pt

(0)

1033/1D

TOTAL

1033/ 2pt 0 46

TOTAL

84 [सं. ओ -12016/ 11/ 2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005

[No. O. - 12016/ 11 /2005 -ONGD - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

S.O. 740. Whereas it appears to the Central, Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from "KSP IEPS- (GS 15/23 ) to SEA SHORE. " in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

का.आ. 741.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में एल.एस.ए.ए. से आर.सी.एम.टी. नर्सापूर तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to:-

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent 2034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA .MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमिके नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के. जि.बेसिन,ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरि भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

[ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 1

6 527/10B

()

004

()

11 527/8C2

( )

15 (0)

527/7B

11 0

527/6B

( )

()

08 526/3D2

()

03 527/7C

(0 0412

()

(X)

504/ 1C1

0112

()

382/5B3/A2 (0

(0) 382/5B3 /A1 ()

आर.ओ.यु. पाइप लाइन: एल.एस.ऐ.ऐ. से आर.सी.एम.टी. नर्सापूर

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिले: पच्छिम गोदावरि

मंडल: नर्सापूर गांव: रूस्तुमबाढ़ा

एकर्स सेन्टस आर. एस . नं. हेक्टेयर्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स

544/12B

0 0212 (0

0 544/13B

03 544/9A2

544/10

03 ()

544/11

()

03 ()

544/12

530/ 1A2

07 ()

530/3B1

0 021/2 (0

0 527/5B

()

18 544/9C2

544/6

0 544/8

()

05 0

04 544/7A2

544/2B

04 ()

0 544/3B

01 (0

()

06 544/4A

505/2B

40 (0

20 547/2P

551/3A

0 0512 551/2C1

0 0

04 (0)

551 /2A

03 0

551/ 1A1

() (0

551/ 1B2

()

529/ 1C1

02 0

529/1B1/ 1

02 0

0 529/ 1B2/ 1

01 0

529/ 1B1/ 1

0 ()

01.

529/ 1A1

0 530/ 3A2

0 530/2C

60 0

07 530/2B

(0)

()

530/ 1B1

1212

131-2 531/2B4

()

531/ 2B3

531/2B2

0 0

09 531/2A2

()

() 531/ 1D1

()

12 (0

506/2J3

()

382/5B3/D2 (0

(X)

()

() 382/5B3/C3 0

15 ()

()

378/3B

506/212

()

05 0

()

() 506/2H2

(0)

506/2G2

061/2 ()

()

() 506/2F2

08 ()

506/2D2

()

(0)

506/2C2

0412

()

507/3D1

()

507/3C1

()

02 ()

() 507/2B

29 506/2A2

()

(07

507/3B1

()

03 (0

()

507/2A1

041-2 0

508/6D1

()

03 508/ 6E1

508/5C2

()

021/2 (0)

()

05 508/6A2

508/5D2

()

0412

(0 ()

(0) 508/2B

(0) 508/5A2

()

0512

()

(0 508/6C2

()

508/5C2

()

0512

()

(0) 510/5C2

(0) 510/5D2

()

01: 2

(0)

510/5E2

()

02 0

()

510/5F2

0212 ()

()

510/2A2

11 ()

()

09 510/2B2

510/2C2

(0)

(0) 0412

(0)

()

510/2D2

1212

()

510/2E2

()

(X)

()

01 510/3A2

0 510/4D2

03 (0

()

() 510/4E2

()

0212 510/4F2

()

390/2

091/2 TOTAL

[सं. ओ-12016 , 12/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. मी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 741. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from L.S.A.A. to R.C.M.T. Narasapur in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Andwhereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to;

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein :

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . , Basin, Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objections shall persons or by legal Practitioner . also state specifically whether he wished to be hear in

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM LSAA TO RCMT NARASAPUR

State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Narasapur District: West Godavari

Village: Rustumbada R.S. No.

Ares Centiares Acres Cents Hectares

6 2

0 021/2 544/ 12B

03 544/13B

0 0

544/9A2

544/10

544/11

0 544/12

530/ 1A2

0 0

530/3B1

021/2

527/5B

544/9C2

18 544/6

0 0

0 544/8

544/7A2

0 0

04 544/2B

0 544/3B

06 544/4A

0 505/2B

547/2P

0 551/3A

051/2 0

551/2C1

03 (0

551 /2A

0 0

551/ 1A1

02 0

551/ 1B2

56562/05-6

2035

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14, 1926

6 1

529/ 1C1

0 529/ 1B1/ 1

0 529/ 1B2/ 1

0 529/1B1/ 1

02 529/ 1A1

530/3A2

09 530/2C

0 530/2B

530/1B1

121/2

531/2B4

131/2 0

08 531/2B3

531/2B2

09 531/ 2A2

531/ 1D1

0 0

527/10B

0 0

527/8C2

15 0

0 527/7B

11 0

0 527/6B

0 526/3D2

03 0

527/7C

041/2 0

504/ 1C1

011/2

0 382/5B2/A2 0

0 382/5B3 /A1 0

12 506/2J3

0 382/5B2/D2 0

382/ 5B3/C3 0

15 0

0 378/3B

0 0

506/212

0 506/2H2

05 0

0 506/2G2

061/2 0

(0 506/2F2

506/2D2

()

05 506/2C2

041/2 0

0 507/3D1

(0 507/3C1

()

29 507/2B

0 506/2A2

0 0

03 507/3B1

041/2 507 /2A1

08 508/6D1

0 (0

03 508/6E1

508/5C2

021/2

05 508/6A2

0 508/5D2

041/2

(0) 508/2B

508/5A2

0512

() 508/6C2

02 0

051:2 508/5C2

()

09 510/5C2

()

0112 510/5D2 2036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] गांव: गेद्दादा

510/5E2

02 0

510/5F2

0 021/2 0

0 510/2A2

510/2B2

09 510/2C2

041/2 510/2D2

121/2 510/2E2

510/3A2

01 510/4D2

03 510/4E2

()

0 510/4F2

021/2 0

0 390/2

TOTAL

6 091/2

[No. O - 12016/ 12/ 2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 742.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में टि.पि.दि.बि. से ताटिपाका 9 तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवाहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथाप्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतद‌अबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन, अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के. जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा। और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची आर.ओ.यु. पाइप लाइन: टि.पि.डि.बि. से ताटिपाक 9

मंडल: राजोलु गांव: कदलि राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश जिले: पूर्व गोदावरि

हैक्टेन्स

आर. एस. नं.

एर्स

एक्रर्स सेन्टस

सेन्टेएर्स

6 1

0 375/2P

11 ()

05 397/5P

()

376/4P

30 0

0 TOTAL

46 1

6 0

120/3B

14 120/3A

122/6B

15 122/6A

07 0

27 122/ 5P

0 122/2P

10 0

24 122/3P

04 0

0 122/4P

04 109/P

108/2P

02 0

08 TOTAL

[सं. ओ-12016/ 13/2005-ओ एन जी डी- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 742. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petrolcum from TPDB to TATIPAKA 9 in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD .

AND WHEREAS it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto:-

NOW THEREFORE , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines. Acquisition of Right ofUsers in the land Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

PROVIDED THAT ANY person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K .G. , Basin . Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry. Andhra Pradesh.

AND every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM TPDB TO ΤΑΤΙΡΑΚΑ 9 State : Andhra Pradesh Mandal Razole

District : East Godavarı Village. Kadali

Acres

Centi Ares

Hectares Arcs

R.S. No. Cents

5 2

()

11 375/2P

()

05 397/5P

()

30 376/4P

TOTAL

0 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

2037 गांव : गेददाडा

Village: Geddada

01 120/3B

120/3A

15 0

122/ 6B

07 122/6A

122/5P

122/2P

122/3P

24 0

122/4P

04 0

109/P

04 0

0 108/2P

TOTAL

[No. O - 12016/ 13 /2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 743.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में टि.पि.डि.सि. से ताटिपाका 8 तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतद‌अबद्द अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोगके अधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोपित कियाहै ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के.जि.बेसिन, ओ.एन.जि.सि. लिमिटेड, गोदावरि भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यु.पाइप लाइन: टि.पि.डि.सि. से ताटिपाका 8 राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश मंडल: राजोलु जिले: गांव : कडलि सिवरू वेगिवारिपालेम पूर्व गोदावरि

हेक्टेयर्स

सेन्टेएर्स

एर्स

एक्रर्स सेन्टस आर . एस. नं.

6 1

15 350/2APt

10 350/ 1PL

0 0

347 /1A5

23 346/2A

0 335/1

0 TOTAL

82/2B

30 0

03 79/2

33 0

TOTAL

[सं. ओ -12016/14/ 2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005

S.O. 743. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from TPDC to TATIPAKA 8 in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD .

AND WHEREAS it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto :-

NOW THEREFORE , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines , Acquisition of Right ofUsers in the land Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein :

PROVIDED THAT ANY person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh.

AND every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM TPDC TO TΤΑΤΙΡΑΚΑ 8

Mandal : Mamidikuduru State: Andhra Pradesh

District: East Godavari Village: Vegivaripalem H/OKdadali R.S. No. Hectares Ares Centiares Acres Cents

6 0

15 350/2A pt

10 350/1 pt

0 347/1A5

08 346/2A

23 0

335/1

10 TOTAL

66 Mandal: MAMIDIKUDURU Village:Geddada

6 82/2B

79/2

33 TOTAL

[No. O - 12016/ 14/2005 -ONGD - IV ] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

2038

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 744.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में एस.आई.ए.ए. से मगटापल्लि-2 I/ C तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतदाअबद्द अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः , अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग, निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के . जि. बेसिन , ओ.एन.जि.सि. लिमिटेड, गोदावरि भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि , आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यु. पाइप लाइन: एस.आई.ए.ए. से मगटापल्लि 2 I/ C राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: मामिदिकुदुरू

गांव : मगटापल्लि जिला: पूर्वगोदावरि

सेंन्टस हेक्टोर्स एर्स

आर. एस. नं.

सेंन्टेएर्स एक्रर्स 1

5 0

26 85/2

15 84/2एफ

84/2एच

84/2के

12 0

87/ 1सी

12 0

0 88/1बी

18 84/2सी

84/1बी

11.5 87/1जे

05.5 0

87/1एच

87/1सी

11.5

21 87/ 1 एफ 0

100/2ई

18.5 0

16 100/2वी

0 0

12 100/1जी

14.5 100/1डी 0

09 102/2आई 0

0 0

01 102/2एच2

00.5 102/2 एल 1 0

102/2के2 0

08.5

PART II-SF 3 ( ii ) 1

6 102/ 1बी2 0

()

20 ()

(X)

01 102/ 1ए2

()

09.5 103/7ए2

()

12.5 103/7बी2

( )

02 103/6वी

()

24 103/5ए2

()

16.5 013/3ए5

()

13 103/3ए2

03 5

103/ 1बी2

103/1सी2

()

() ()

02 103/1ए2

()

02 71/12

()

11 71/1बी2

()

() 52/2

(0)

()

51/2

42.5 जोड़

गांव: आदुरू

(X)

01 318/15/2

(0) 0

54.5 319/2

()

05.5

318/ 1 ए3-4

()

07.5 319/3

(0 318/ 1 ए3-2

(X)

01 319/4

()

(0)

20 318/ 1ए1-2 0

24 318/ 12-2 (0

()

27 0

(0) 316/8-1

06 0

(0 317/4-2

(0) 0

317/3-2

(0 0

21 316/9-2

33 316/7-2

(0)

(0 316/6-2

()

15 0

()

06.5

316/5-2

()

316/4-2

08.5 0

0 316/3-2

05 0

(0 316/2-2

()

316/1-2

()

02.5

2 1

जोड़

[सं. ओ-12016/15/ 2005-ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2005 S.O. 744. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from SIAA to MAGATAPALLI - 2 I / C in tlıc A.P state pipeline should [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2039

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन14, 1926

be laidby theOil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - Section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of users in the land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wished to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : SIAA TO MAGATAPALLI -2 I/C

State: Andhra Pradesh Mandal: Mamidikuduru District : East Godavari Village: Magatapalli

Ares Centi AresAcres Cents R.S. No. Hectares

6 1

5 2

26 85/2

15 84/2F

24 84/2H

84/2K

12 87/1C

12 0

88/ 1B

0 84/2C

0 0

84/1B

11.5 0

0 87/1J

05.5 87/ 1H

87/ 1C

0 0

11.5

0 87/1F

21 0

0 100/2E

18.5

0 0

16 100/2B

0 100/1G

14.5

0 100/1D

0 0

102/21

09 0

0 102/2H2

00.5 0

102/2L1

6 1

08.5 102/ 2K2

20 102/ 1B2

0 102/ 1A2

09.5

0 103/7A2

0 0

12.5 103/7B2

02 103/6B

0 103/5A2

0 0

16.5 103/3A5

103/3A2

13 0

(0 103/ 1B2

03.5

(0 103/ 1C2

09 0

103/ 1A2

02 0

71/ 1A2

71/1B2

22 0

0 52/2

51/2

TOTAL

42.5 Village: Aduru

01 318/ 1A5/2 0

319/2

54.5

05.5 318/1A3-4 0

319/3

07.5

07 318/1A3-2 0

319/4

20 318/ 1A1-2 0

24 318/ 1A2-2 0

316/8-1

27 0

()

06 317/4-2

15 317/3-2

0 0

0 316/9-2

33 316/7-2

316/6-2

0 316/5-2

06.5

06 316/4-2

316/3-2

08.5

0 0

316/2-2

05 316/1-2

02.5 TOTAL

66 1

[No. O- 12016/ 15/2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

2040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 745.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में पासलेपुढ़ी 28 से पासर्लपुढ़ी 12 तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और अतः , यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतदुपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है;

अतः , अब, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोपित किया है :

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति , उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के .जी. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर. ओ. यू. लाईन: पासर्ल्सपुढ़ी 28 से पासर्ल्सपुढ़ी 12 तक राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: मामिडिकुदुरु जिले: पूर्वगोदावरी

गांव: पासलेपुढ़ि

सेन्टेएर्स

हेक्टेयर्स एर्स

आर . एस. नं.

एकड़ सेन्ट्रस

5 6 1

(0 06 1/2 407/5ए

0 (0)

407/2बी

06 1/2

(0)

06 12 407/3बी

(0 407/4वी

16%

408/3बी

20 (0

()

(0 05 407/ 1 ए2

()

403/2सी

092

0 ()

28 405/1 ए

(0)

403/2डी

()

09 .

22 403/2बी

406/4बी

()

0 102

(0 242

403/2ए

(0)

400/6सी

052

(0 062 400/6वी

()

() 052 ()

400/6ए

()

(0) 39

400/5सी

24 (0)

0 400/5बी

(0) 062 (0

406/4सी

()

406/1बी

16½

जोड़

[सं. ओ-12016/16/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005

S.O. 745. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from Pasarllapudi - 28 to Pasarllapudi - 12 in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.;

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto;

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the land) Act, 1962( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein :

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .. Rajahmundry Asset/ K.G. Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in person or by legal practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM PASARLLAPUDI 28 TO PASARLLAPUDI 12

State . Andhra PradeshMandal . Mamidikuduru District : East Godavari Village : Pasarllapudi

Centiares

Ares

Acres Cents Hectares

R.S. No.

5 6 1

(0 062

407/5A

062 407/2B

062 407/3B

()

162 407/4B

()

(0 20

408/3B

(0 05 (0

()

407/ 1A2

403/2C

092

() 28

405/ 1A

05 (0

()

403/2D

()

22 ()

403/2B

(0)

()

406/4B

()

10%

()

(x)

24½ 403 /2A

()

400/6C

(0)

052

()

062 400/6B

()

() 05% ()

400/6A

()

39 (0

400/5C

()

(x)

24 400/5B

()

062 406/4C

(0)

16% 406/ 1B

2 64

Total

[No. O - 12016/16/2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C ZAKHUP. Under Secy [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2041

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 746.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में नंदिगामा 3 से नंदिगामा । इपीएस तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः , अब , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है :

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग, निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग, के.जी. प्रोजेक्ट, राजामुन्द्री- 533103 को अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा;

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू.पाइप लाइन नंदिगामा 3 से नंदिगामा 1 इपीएस राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश मंडल : पेडना

30 230/पी

0 14 202/3बी

0 05

202/3ए

0 0

02 202/ 1पी

10 202/14बी

03 201/12पी

04 201/13पी

0 03 0

201/14पी

0 07

201/16पी

0 0

06 201/11पी

0 0

07 201/10पी

0 07 201/5पी

0 201/7पी

08 0

0 201/4पी

04 0

0 201/3पी

0 22 199/1पी

0 23 199/4पी

04 185/5पी

0 0

14 190/6पी

0 0

01 190/7सीपी

0 02 0

190/8 एपी

08 0

190/7बीपी

0 08 190/7एपी 0

गांव: नंदिगामा

जिला: कृष्णा

सेंन्टीएर्स

हेक्टेयर्स एर्स

एकड़ सेंन्ट्स आर. एस. नं.

5 6 1

0 54 307/पी

18 306/3पी

0 0

13 306/2पी

0 0

26 305/2पी

26 305/1पी

0 0

23 304/4पी

21 304/2पी

0 19 223/2पी

18 224/2पी

225/2बी

0 25

0 23 225/2ए

0 226/2पी

17 (0

0 01 202/5पी

202/6पी

0 0

0 13 202/7पी

0 01 202/8पी

0 202/9पी

12 0

0 04 202/10पी

230/3पी

0 11

26 230/1पी

228/पी

0 23 0

229/2पी

0 01 ()

21 199/2पी

13 190/2पीपी

0 04 191/7बीपी

0 04 190/8बीपी

01 0

0 190/8सीपी

Total

[सं. ओ -12016/17/ 2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 746. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from Nandigama #3 to Nandigama # 1 EPS in A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .;

And whereas it appears that for the purpose oflaying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein :

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , K.G. Project , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in person or by legal Practitioner.

2042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM NANDIGAMA # 3 TO NANDIGAMA # 1 EPS

State : Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Pedana District Krishna

Village Nandigama R.S. No

Ares

Acres Cents Hectares

Centiares

5 307/P

(0)

()

54 306/3P

(0)

18 306/2P

()

(0)

13 305/2P

()

(0)

26 ()

305/ 1P

()

26 304/4P

()

23 304/2P

()

21 223/2P

()

19 224/2P

(0)

()

18 225/2B

()

25 ()

225/2A

23 226/2P

(0)

(07

()

17 202/5P

()

01 (0

202/6P

(0)

()

14 202/7P

()

13 ()

202/8P

()

01 202/9P

()

12 202/ 10P

()

004 230/3P

004

()

11 230/ 1P

()

26 ()

() 228/P

(09

23 229/21

()

01 (0

199/2P

()

21 230/P

()

202/3B

()

14 202/3A

()

202/ 1P

()

02 ()

(04

()

() 202/14B

10 201/ 12P

()

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

6 190/7AP

()

190/2P

13 (0

191/7DP

190/8BP

()

04 (0

190/8CP

Total

[No. 0-12016/ 17/2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 747.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में के . डब्ल्यु.ए.के. ,के.डब्ल्यु.डी.बी. , के.डब्ल्यु.ए.आई. से केसनपल्लि जी.सी.एस. तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) , अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोपित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग , राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के.जी.बेसिन, ओ. एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध प्रदेश को अधिसूचना की तारीख मे 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाइन के. डब्ल्यू. ए, के. डब्ल्यु.डी.बी. , के. डब्ल्यू.ए.आई से केसनर्पाल्ल जी.सी.एस.

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

201/ 13P

()

(04

मंडल: मलिकिपुरम

गांव: गोगन्नमटम मिवारु करवाका जिला: पूर्व गोदावरी

()

03 201/ 14P

()

() ()

()

07 201/16P

()

06 201 / 11P

201/10P

( )

()

07 ()

(0 201/6P

()

07 ()

()

201/7P

() ()

() 201/4P

()

201/3P

(04

()

(x)

()

199/ 1P

()

22 ()

() 199 /4P

(x)

23 ()

() 185/5P

()

14 190/60P

(X)

(01 190/7CP

()

02 190/ 8AP

()

190/7BP

()

08 आर. एस. नं.

हक्टर्स एस संन्टएर्स एकस सेंन्टस

6 2

()

10 395/ 2,394/ 2.389/ 20

() 389/ 1बी

()

13 ()

()

() 072 389/ 1ए

()

20 389/3 ए

()

(X )

382/पी

(X)

()

382/2पी

()

5 12½ 381/4ए

()

5 380/एफ

062 ()

()

(01

03 380/बी

()

06 380/बी2पी

()

(X) (0

372/2बी

()

(03

(09 372/एफ [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6 0

372/पी

30 0

0 371/एफ

371/सी

0 132

371/सी,पी

172

0 12 363/2ए,पी

372/पी

10 381/पी

0 363/1

562 जोड़

गांव : केसनपल्लिसिवारु गोल्लापालेम

आर. एस. नं.

एकड़ सेंन्टस हेक्टेयर्स एर्स सेंटेएर्स

6 1

492/ 1पी

532/1पी

02 491/4पी

0 02 532/1पी

0 04 502/6पी

0 492/2पी

0 20 492/6पी

0 332 489/2एपीटी

0 489/2पी

16 486/4पी

556/सीपीटी

1 372 जोड़

[सं. ओ -12016/18/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 747. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthetransport of petroleum from KWAK, KWDB , KWAI TO KESANAPALLI GCS in the A.P. State pipeline should be laidby the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto :-

Now therefore as, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan, Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in person or by legal Practitioner.

56562/05-7

2043

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14, 1926

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM KWAK, KWDB , KWAI TO KESANAPALLI GCS

Mandal : Mamidikuduru State : Andhra Pradesh

District: East Godavari Village Karavaka H /O

Gogannamatham

Ares Centiares Acres Cents Hectares

R. S. No.

004

() 395/2,394/2.389/ 2 (0

13 (0

( ) 389/ 1B

()

(0)

07 ()

389/ 1A

()

20 ()

389/3A

() 382/P

()

() ()

382/2P

(0)

12% 381/4A

()- 06% 380/F

(0)

380/B

()

06 380/B2P

09 0

372/2B

()

09 0

372/F

()

() (0)

30 372/P

() 0

06 371 /F

() 0

371/C

132 0

(0) 172 371/C,P

()

12 363/ 2AP

() (0

372/P

()

381/P

10 (0)

(0) 363/1

10 0

Total

562 Village:Gollapalem H/O Kesanapalli

R.S. No. Hectares Ares Centiares Acres Cents

()

(0 05 0

492/ 1P

12 0

0 532/ 1P

()

491/4P

() 532/ 1P

02 (0

()

502/6P

22 492/2P

20 492/6P

332 0

489/2Apt

09 489/2P

() 486/4P

12 556/CPt

Total

1 372

[No. O - 12016/ 18 /2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Sccy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 748.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में ई.पी.ए.ए. से ताटिपाकाजी.सी.एस. तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवाहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । 2044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एता‌बद्द अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोपित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के.जि. बेसिन, ओ . एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरि भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाईपलाईन: ई.पी.ऐ.ऐ.से. ताटिपाका जी.सी.एस.

मंडल: मामिदिकुदुरु गांव : अप्पनपल्लि राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश जिले : पूर्व गोदावरि

आर. एस. नं. हेक्टोन्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एकर्स सेन्टस 1

5 6 238/3C

0 239/8

(0)

239/9

35 (0

0 0

131/2B

0 03 0

131/3C

0 06 188/2

06 0

239/5

0 02 245/4

0 04

245/5

0 05 245/7B

0 0

245 /7C

0 21 245/6

0 245/8A

0 30 245/8B

0 02 (0

[ PART 11 - SEC . 3 ( ii ) | '

()

198/6B

()

198/6C

(0)

198/6D

()

183/3B

()

() 20

188/3C

0 20

()

188/4B

()

(0)

188/4C

()

201/1,3,7,8 ()

188/5

()

187/3

(0 37

()

146/1A

146/1B

()

146/3

()

146/2

()

149/6

135/1

(0)

136/2

()

136/4A3

( )

136/3B, 3C

()

136/3D

()

136/4A2

133/1

() 23

129/3

(04

131/ 1P

()

131 /2A

131/2B

()

(0)

131/2C

()

131/3B

() 20

()

131/3A

(05

131/2C

()

131/3D

()

131/2D

()

() 02

131/3E

()

(0)

131/2E

Total

गांव : पेदपटनमलंका

246/2B

245/5

0 05 0

246/1

80 0

246/2A

0 05

24 220/2

0 0

220/3

0 20

61 204/1,2,3,4 0

205/4

0 06

0 06 205/5

205/6

0 16

201/13B

0 34

0 205/7

29 0

() 24 201/13C

18 197/1

21/4B

()

21/4C

()

21/5P

()

53/9C

54/1C

54/3C

19/2

(0) 04

19/3B2

19/3B3

()

(07

()

19/3B4

76/ 1B

()

0 42

76/4

80/ 1B

T [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2045

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

6 2

5 80/ 1C

0 11 0

0 32

142/4C

0 09 80/2A

0 80/3B

60 0

84/2

0 69 0

0 50 153/3

04 152/4B

63 0

0 152/4C

151/7B

0 25

151/11

0 01 0

134/6P

0 06

142/4B

32 0

142/5B

0 48 0

0 136/5B

08 136/4

28 136/5C

0 85

136/ 1P

0 80 0

0 134/5A

02 0

136/3P

0 18 0

0 135/7

55 0

87 135/5

135/6

0 12

0 151/7C

11 0

0 06 134/5B

134/5C

0 0

0 134/4

30 4

10 Total

47 गांव: मामिदिकुदुरु

0 25 50/5AP

50/3B

0 0

0 50/3A

16 0

35 49/1,2A

0 05 50/1

50/2

0 08 0

48/2

0 48/3

0 13 0

55/P

0 21

36/6A

0 12 0

56/4

0 0

56/2

0 03 56/3

07 0

56/5A

0 15 0

39/5

0 17

39/7B

0 14 36/2

0 27 36/4

0 0

36/5

0 12

33/P

6 1

5 0

0 15 18/1

18/3

0 15 0

0 09 18/2

0 16/4A

0 0

39/ 1C

22 0

0 39/3

15 0

0 14 39/8A

0 07 16/4B

16/4E

13 0

0 16/5A

09 0

16/5B

0 14 0

16/2B,3

0 20

14/2B

0 16 0

14/2C

(0 20

0 5/1A

0 5/1B

0 5/B2

30 5/B3

6/1B

(0 0

18 6/1C

0 0

15 7 /A

1 20 7/ 1E1

0 03 3

53 Total

8 गांव: पासार्लपूडि

203/2

60 202/1

0 25 4/2,3C

30 0

() 4/3D,5/3

(0 0

29 4/ 3B,5/2

(0 94 10/1A, 1B, 1

0 22 10/2,15/4B

14/6B

13 0

34 14/4,5,6

17/ 1B

0 14

0 17/ 1C

12 17/1D

0 16 0

17/ 1E

0 09 0

17/ 1F

0 09 17/1G

0 09 0

0 65 16/1B,2B

Total

32 गांव : नगरम

232/ 15A1

5 25

0 0

224/1A2

10 0

232/15A2

10 0

233/P

0 41

34 0

0 236/ 1B6 2046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

0 236/B5

36 236/B4

0 184/P

0 07 236/B3

0 21

0 240/P

(0)

19 236/B2

17 236/B1

46 0

0 239/P

04 0

0 02 181/ 1A

62 180/P

0 0

0 181/C

04 0

242/ 2P

0 25 175/P

19 243/1B

0 0

08 ()

0 145/5A

145/4C

0 24 0

0 145/5B

08 0

0 146/3

02 146/4

0 07 (0)

0 169/1A3

20 169/1A4

(0 169/ 1A5

181/2A

27 (0)

181/2B

Total

5 71 [सं. ओ -12016/19/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 478. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthetransport of petroleum from EPAA TO TATΙΡΑΚΑ GCS in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD .

And whereas it appears that for the purpose oflaying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act . 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein :

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.. Rajahmundry Assct/K.G . , Basin . Godavari Bhavan , Base complex . Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : ΕΡΑΑ ΤΟ ΤΑTIPAKA GCS

Mandal: Mamidikuduru State : Andhra Pradesh

District: East Godavari

Village: Appa napalli

R.S. No.

Centiares Acres Cents Hectares Ares

5 6

48 0

238/3C

0 07 239/8

35 0

239/9

(0)

03 131/2B

0 06 131/3C

06 0

188/2

()

0 02 239/5

04 245/4

245/5

()

13 245/7B

245/7C

245/6

()

0 84

30 245/8A

245/8B

0 02 0

83 246/2B

245/5

0 05

()

80 246/1

0 05 246/2A

0 24 220/2

(0)

220/3

0 61 204/1,2,3,4,6 0

06 205/4

205/5

(0 06

16 0

205/6

()

34 201/13B

0 29 205/7

24 0

201/13C

18 197/1

(0 43 0

198/6B

12 0

198/6C

07 0

198/6D

0 20 183/3B

20 0

()

188/3C

(0 12 188/4B

()

188/4C

(0)

201/1,3.7.8.10 0

()

188/5

(0 37

187/3

0 01

146/ 1A

0 60

146/1B

10 146/3

(0)

()

15 146/2

()

149/6

()

03 (0

135/1

(0 43

005

136/2

T [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2047

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुनं 14, 1926

6 1

14 136/4A3

0 0

0 24 136/3B , 3C

0 136/3D

12 136/4A2

0 14 0

0 23 133/1

04 129/3

0 0

131/ 1P

01 131 /2A

0 0

0 03 131/2B

131/ 2C

0 05 131/3B

0 26

0 20 131/3A

131/2C

0 05

131/3D

0 06

131/2D

0 02 131/3E

131/2E

0 08 6

Total

14 93 Village:Pedapatnamlanka

0 15 21/4B

05 21/4C

21./5P

0 17

0 53/9C

0 0

14 54/ 1C

16 0

0 54/3C

19/2

0 18 0

0 04 19/3B2

06 19/3B3

()

0 07 19/3B4

76/ 1B

0 14 76/4

()

0 42 ()

80/1B

0 29

80/1C

0 11

32 142/4C

()

09 (0

0 80/2A

60 80/3B

69 84/2

()

153/3

0 50

04 ()

0 152/4B

152/4C

151/7B

0 25

0 01 151/11

06 0

134/6P

32 142/4B

142/5B

()

0 48 136/5B

0 08 0

0 136/4

0 136/5C

(0)

0 136/ IP

80 ()

02 134/5A

00 136/3P

0 18 ( )

6 1

55 135/7

0 135/5

87 135/6

0 12

0 0

151/7C

11 0

0 06 134/5B

0 134/5C

0 30 134/4

47 Total

10 Village:Mamidikuduru

0 50/5AP

0 0

50/3B

0 50/3 A

0 35 49/1,2A

50/1

0 05

0 50/2

08 0

48/2

0 13

48/3

0 13

0 55/P

36/6A

56/4

44 0

0 56/2

56/3

07 56/5A

0 15 39/5

0 17

0 14 39/7B

36/2

0 27 36/4

0 25 36/5

0 12 33/P

0 0

50 18/1

0 0

18/3

0 0

09 18/2

0 06 0

16/4A

0 22 39/ 1C

0 15 39/3

39/8A

0 0

0 16/4B

07 0

16/4E

0 13

09 16/5A

16/5B

0 14

20 16/2B,3

0 0

0 14/2B

16 0

14/2C

0 20

5/ 1A

0 18

56 5/ 1B

0 5/B2

0 0

5/B3

0 11 0

18 6/1B

0 0

15 6/1C

0 7/A

1 20

0 03 7/ 1E1

53 Total 2048

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . MARCH 5. 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

Village.Pasarlapudi

6 (0)

203/2

()

09 202/1

()

0 4/2.3C

()

() 42 ()

4/3D.5/3

(0 30 ()

4/3B.5/2

()

() 10/1A.1B.15/5 ()

94 ()

(09

() 10/2.15/4B

22 0

14/6B

0 13 14/4.5.6

()

34 17/ 1B

()

14 17 / 1C

()

(0 05

()

12 17/1D

()

17 / 1E

(0)

()

09 17/ 1F

()

(0 09

17/1G

0 09 ()

16/ 1B.2B

(0 65 Total

4 32 Village: Nagaram

232/ 15A1

()

0 25 224/ 1A2

()

232/ 15A2

() 0

10 233/P

0 41

236/ 1B6

( )

34 236/B5

() 03

0 09

PART II- SEC 3 (ii) नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 749.- यतः कन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में पि.ओ.दि.बि. से मुलिकिपल्लि-1 तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवाहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतदाअबद्द अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोगके अधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषितकिया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एमट/ के.जि. बेसिन, ओ. एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड. गोदावरी भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि. आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाईपलाईन : पी.वो.दि.बि. से मुलिकेपल्लि राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: रजोलु जिला: पूर्व गोदावरि

236/B4

(0)

(0 0

184/P

0 07

236/B3

(0) 08

() 21

240/P

()

(0 19 236/B2

()

0 17 236/B1

0 18

0 239/P

0 01

04 0

181 / 1A

02 180 /P

0 62 181/C

0 01

0 04 242/2P

()

25 175/P

0 07

0 19 (0

243/1B

145/ 5A

0 08 145/4C

0 24

()

145/5B

08 146/3

0 01

0 02

146/4

0 07 0

169/1A3

14 169/ 1A4

(0 08

0 20 169/ 1A5

0 0 04

10 181 /2A

0 23 0

181/2B

0 27 2

Total

5 71

[No. O. - 12016/19 / 2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

गांव : पोन्नमंदा हेक्टोन्स एस

आर. एस. नं.

सेंन्टे एस एक्रर्स सेंन्टस

638/2

()

14 ()

422/14

16 (0

()

08 422/ 15A

(0)

422/ 11C

422/8

04 422/9A

()

004 (0

()

422/12

()

422/ 13A

()

422/ 1B

(0)

() 05 422/2B

()

421/3B

()

() 052

421/3C

()

052

421/3D

()

052 0

()

421/3E

()

052 421/3F

04 0

()

421/3G

032 0

()

05 425/9B

()

425/8C

()

11 0

()

425/8B

12 425/1C

13 0

() 425/ 1B

132 (0

()

() 482/ 1BPT

004

10 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

2049

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

0 481/2E

0 481/2C

152 0

481/2G

062 0

0 481/2B

102

0 449/5

342 0

05 480/4B

480/3B

03/2

0 480/1B

052

480/2B

05 0

0 479/5B

01 .

02 479/6B

0 03 0

0 0

479/18D

479/ 18C

0 08 0

479/2

0 10 0

0 02

479/14

0 479/15

022 479/16

022

479/17

022

0 05 478/4B

478/5B

0 02/2 0

478/3 A

0 02/2 0

478/6C

022

0 478/2B

022

0 0

478/6B

022

12 0

478/ 1B

452/ 11C

0 11

0 06

452/10B

452/3B

0 452/ 1B

0 042 0

0 05 452/4B

0 06 0

452/ 6B

452/2B

0 02 0

0 05 452/5B

459/9B

0 09

0 0

459/5CP

15 495/5P

0 13 0

421/3A

0 04 0

0 16 482/ 1B PT

0 482/1B PT

4 Total

892 [सं. ओ -12016/20/2005- ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 749. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from PODB TO MULIKIPALLI - 1 in the A.P. state pipeline shouldbe laid by the OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD .

And whereas , it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

NOW THEREFORE , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right ofuser therein:

PROVIDED THAT ANY person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the CompetentAuthority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

AND every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM PODB TOMULIKIPALLI- 1

Razole State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal:

District: East Godavari

Village: Ponnamanda R.S. No.

Ares Centi ares Acres Cents Hectares

6 1

5 0

14 638/2

0 422/14

0 0

422/ 15A

03.

422/ 11C

422/8

422/9A

422/12

0 422/ 13A

05 0

422/ 1B

0 422/2B

421/3B

0 052 0

421/3C

052

421/3D

0 052

0 421/3E

052

0 421/3F

0 421/3G

032 0

425/9B

0 0

0 425/8C

11 0

425/8B

0 12 0

425/ 1C

0 13 0

425/1B

0 132 0

0 482/ 1B PT

10 0

0 481/2E

14 0

481/2C

0 152

481/2G

0 06/2

0 481/2B

10/2 0

449/5

342 0

480/4B

0 480/3B

03/2

0 480/1B

052 2050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

5 0

0 05 480/2B

479/5B

02 (0

479/6B

0 ()

479/18D

11 (0

479/ 18C

0 08 0

10 479/2

479/14

02 479/15

022 479/16

(0)

(0 022 479/17

()

(01

(0 022

05 478/4B

0 (0)

478/5B

022 ()

(0) 478/3 A

022 478/6C

(0)

()

() 022

(0)

478/2B

()

022 ()

478/6B

(0 02/2

0 478/ 1B

()

12 ()

452/ 11C

(0)

11 ()

452/ 10B

()

452/3B

()

452/ 1B

()

(01

042 452/4B

(0 0

(0)

05 452/6B

() 06 ()

(0)

() 452/2B

(0)

02 452/5B

( )

()

(0 ()

459/9B

() 60 (0

459/5CP

15 495/5P

()

421/3A

()

04 0

482/ 1BPT

(0) 16 482/ IBPT

() 16 Total

()

4 1

892

[No. O. - 12016/20/ 2005 -ONGD - IV ] N. C. JAKHUP. Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 750.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाईप लाईनः ' मोरि-10 से मोरि-8 ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एत‌द्याबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोगके अधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] गैस आयोग, निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के.जि.बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू.पाईप लाईन: मोरी -10 से मोरी-8 राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: मलीकिपुरम

गांव : कत्तिमंड जिले: पूर्वगोदावरी

हेक्टेयर्स एर्स

आर. एस. नं.

एक्रर्स सेन्टस

सेन्टे एर्स

5 1

6 0

18 53/4,5

(0 27 58/9pt, 10pt 0

15 0

88/13pt

()

17 58/10pt

17 (0

(0 58/9pt

04 54/5pt

() 06 58/10pt

()

18 58/10pt

() 004 45/8pt

()

13 56/1A

(0 01 57/5pt

(0)

()

() 54/4pt

54/6

()

(0)

30 (0

56/ IB

(0)

() 54/14pt

()

(0)

() 05 57 /5A

17 ()

()

() 85/ 1A

85/3A, 4A

(0 85/7pt, 8pt

0 88/2,3,6,7 & 8 0

()

() 05

94/4pt

88/14

() 13 0

88/15

() ()

(0 06 89/2pl

05 88/9

13 88/12

()

88/10

() (0

88/11

() 0

()

89/1

() 02 (0

()

37 89/2

()

89/14

()

10 90/1

()

05 90/C

()

0 90/B

()

11 92/ 12pt

()

(0)

()

22 92/ 11pt . 10pt ( )

()

94/5

()

07 94/2pt

() ()

()

2575

15 76/pl [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

0 07 96/1B

33 96/1A, 72/ pt 0

5 Total

58 मंडल : साखीनेटीपाल्ली गांव : मोरिपोडू

0 38/2

2051

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM Mori- 10 to Mori-8 State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal : Malikipuram District : East Godavari

Village:Kathimanda S. No.

Ares Centiares Acres Cents Hectares

6 2

18 0

53/4,5

27 0

0 58/9pt, 10p

328/2B

08 0

328/ 1G

0 14

0 0

20 328/ 1F

0 10

312/4pt

328/1B

26 328/ 1A

312/2P

0 05

0 06

312/ 2pt

38 311/3pt

0 300/3pt

301/4

0 09

0 0

301/5

0 0

300/1pt

300/2A

0 20

0 300/2B

0 299/1A

0 0

16 302/2pt

15 299/5B

0 15 0

88/13pt

0 0

58/10pt

0 0

58/9pt

0 04

54/5pt

06 0

58/10pt

0 18 58/10pt

0 04 0

54/8pt

13 56/1A

0 01

57/5pt

54/4pt

54/6

0 30 56/1B

14 0

54/14pt

05 0

0 57/5A

17 85/ 1A

0 0

85/3A, 4A

0 85/7pt , 8pt

35 Total

[सं. ओ-12016/21/2005- ओ एन जी डी- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 750.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " MORI 10 TO MORI - 8" in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD .

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto :--

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein: 1

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base complex. Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh.

AND every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be heard in persons or by legal Practitioner.

5656205-8

0 88/2,3,6,7&8 0

05 0

94/4pt

0 88/14

0 05 88/15

06 0

89/2pt

0 05 0

88/9

13 88/12

0 0

05 88/10

16 88/11

0 89/1

02 0

0 37 0

89/2

0 89/14

0 0

90/1

05 90/C

06 0

90/B

11 0

92/12pt

22 92/ 11pt , 10pt 0

0 94/5

0 07 0

94/2pt

15 0

76/pt

0 0

07 96/1B

0 33 96/ 1A, 72/ pt 0

58 2

Total 2052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

Mandal Sakhinetipalli Village : Moripodu

6 38/2

(0)

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाईप लाईन: कैकुलूर ई पी एस से लिंगाला

जी.सी.एस.

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

328/2B

(0 08

मंडल: मुदिनेपल्लि

गांव: चिगुरुकाकोटा जिला: कृष्णा

328/1G

14 328/ IF

()

(0)

10 312/4pt

328/ 1B

()

(0 39

एक्रर्स सेन्टस हेक्टेयर्स एर्स

आर. एस. नं.

सेन्टे एर्स

6 0

375/ 1DPt

()

(0) 05

375/ 2E2/Bpt 0

328/ 1A

26 312/2P

387/1C4pt 0

0 05 0

(0)

06 312/ 2pt

()

0 38 311/3pt

(0)

03 0

()

375/3E2

0 0

02 382/ 1B

02 375/ 3E2 Bpt 0

300/3pt

301/4

() 09 301/5

(0)

(0) 45

20 300/1pt

()

0 300/2A

20 (0

()

300/2B

0 08

0 299/1A

0 16 302/ 2pt

299/5B

0 15 1

35 Total

382/5B1

0 01 (0

()

02 382/4D1

(0 0

380/ 1A1

0 01 (0

382/4AL

0 0

(0 01 382/5A1

(0)

() 380/2A

02 ()

() 380/ 1B1

01 ()

(0 02 382/4C1

0 Total

38 0

गांव: चिनाकामनपूडि

[No. O - 12016/ 21 /2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. JAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 751.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाईप लाइनः ' कैकलूर ई.पी.एस. से लिंगाल जी.सी.एस ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एत‌द्याबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

(0 0

02 21/ 1AIA

(0 01 21 / 1A2A

21/ 1A4A

(0) 01

(0 0

01 21 / 1A5A

(0 23/ 1A1

01 (0

() 23/ 1C1

(0 01

23/2A

() 01 23/3A

() 23/4A

(01

(0 01 23/5A1

0 01 23/5B1

(0)

0 02 (0

23/5C1

(0 02

23/5D1

()

23/5E1

()

0 002

(0 01 23/5E3

(0)

(0 07

24/2A

(0)

() 03

24/ 1B

() 02 24/ 1C

0 0

292 Total

गांव: पेदकामनपूडि

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट / के.जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

24/2B

()

24/3A

0 (0

24/3B

13 (0

24/3D

()

08 (0)

94/2A1

() (0)

07 94/6B

()

07 0

94/ 7Pt [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

97/4A

0 07 97/4B

0 97/5P

0 13 0

97/6P

0 11 97/8P

0 12 (0

0 100/4

15 0

122/ 1P

0 20

()

123/4

125 / 1A

0 02 0

123/3

0 10 0

125/1D

0 14 24/3C

94/2A2

0 04

94/6A

0 03 123/2

() 09 0

125/3B

(0 16 0

0 07 126/1A

2053

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

6 0

()

166/ 1B

()

15 166/2P

() 06 ()

()

166/3P

()

(07 0

166/1A

()

15 0

() 166/4A

166/4B

()

16 0

165/1A

Ю ()

165/ 1B

() (0

165/2

()

165/3

() (04 0

()

() 165/4

05 165/5

()

() 05 0

()

165/6

() 0

()

165/7

() 05

Total

8 07 गांव : वडालि

0 122/4P

20 123/1

0 0

0 126/ 1B

08 0

0 126/2A

19 0

0 126/2B

18 1

3 05

Total

गांव: पेदकामनपूडि

7/1

0 19

7/2

0 23 0

0 19/1A

0 0

15 19/ 1B

7/3

23 0

19/2

0 31

21 / 1A

0 0812

21/ 1B

0 082 21/C

0 17 0

33/P

32/1

0 0

32/2

0 0

32/3

45 32/4

0 28 0

30/ 1A

0 17

36 31/P

0 0

0 30/ 1B

17 0

30/2A

0 30/2B

0 17 156/1

156/2

0 10

0 17 156/3

36 156/4

0 0

161/1

0 24 0

0 16 161/2

161/3

0 19 0

20 161/4

0 0

3/P

() 24

6/5A

(0) 09

()

29/ 1P

() 252 6/5B

()

11 0

6/8P

()

32/ 12A

() 06

7/3A

06 0

7/3B

()

() 05 7/2

() 8/7

(0 28

9/P

()

11/P

() 12/P

()

29 20/2P

0 12

20/ 1P

() 20/5P

(0 22/ 1P

0 53

() 23 0

31 /2A

31/5A

03 32/ 7A

0 0

32/7P

(0 03 0

33/8A

32/8B

0 03 0

32/ 11A1

()

0 03 32/11B2

09 81/ 1A

81/3P

(0 132 0

82/1B

82/6B

07 0

0 84/3A

()

0 84/4A

0 85/7A

66/2A

() 0

67/2A

0 08

70/ 1B1

0 08 0

(0)

02 70/ 2A1 2054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

5 0

0 70/3A1

04 ()

0 70/4A1

[PAR ! 11- S 3 ( ii ) ]

5 2

6 0

()

ΟΙ

03 375/3E2

382/ 1B

() 02 (0)

()

02 375/3E2Bpt

0 04 72/6 * Govt

(0) 02 72/4* Govt 0

0 201/ 1C

08 0

0 69/1A

0 66/2A

(0 65/1A

02 Total

4 55 गांव: चेवूरु

35/3

0 15 0

33/3C

0 10 36/2C

38/2C

0 0

41 Total

[सं. ओ-12016/22/2005- ओ. एन. जी. डी- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 751. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " KAIKALUR EPS LINGALA GCS " in the A.P. state pipeline shouldbe laid by the OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD .

And whereas it appears that for the purpose oflaying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to;

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein :

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM KAIKALUR: EPS TO LINGALA GCS

State : Andhra Pradesh Mandal: Mudenepalli District : Krishna

Village: Chigurukota R.S. No. Hectares Ares Centiares Acres Cents

6 2

5 0

0 375/ 1DPt

0 05

375/ 2E22/Bpt 0

0 05 387/ 1C4pt

0 382/ 5B1

01 0

ΟΙ

() 02 382.4D1

()

380/ 1A1

01 0

(0)

() 05 382/4A1

()

382/ 5A1

(X)

01 0

()

380/ 2A

() 02

() 380/ 1B1

(X)

01 0

(01

()

() 382/4C1

02 0

Total

38 Village: Chinakamanapudi

()

() 21 / 1A1A

() 0

(0)

01 21 / 1A2A

(0)

() 01 21 / 1A4A

()

(0)

()

01 21 / 1A5A

() (01 23/ 1A1

()

23/ 1C1

() 01 0

()

(01

23 /2A

(X)

() 23/3 A

()

(0)

() 01 23/4A

()

01 23 /5A1

() 23/5B1

01 23/5C1

()

(0)

() 02

02 ()

()

() 23/5D1

()

00 23/5E1

()

23/5E3

01/2

07 0

(0 24/2A

03 24/ 1B

()

(0)

()

02 (0

24/ 1C

0 0

Total

292 Village: Chinakamanapudi

24/2B

()

() 07

()

08 ()

()

24/3A

()

24/3B

()

24/3D

13 0

()

() 08 94/2A1

94/6B

(0 ()

()

94/7Pt

()

() 07

97/4A

() (04

97/4B

()

() 13

97/5P

()

97/6P

()

11 0

97/8P

()

(0)

15 0

100/4

() 0

122/ 1P

()

14 123/4

() 0

125/ 1A

004

()

( )

10 123/3

()

125/ 1D

05 0

()

24/3C

02 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2055

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

6 1

0 0

94/ 2A2

04.

0 0

03 94/6A

09 0

0 123/2

125/3B

16 0

0 07 126/1A

0 122/4P

20 0

0 09 123/1

0 08 126/ 1B

0 19 126/2A

0 0

18 126/2B

05 1

Total

Village: Pedakamana

7/1

0 19 7/2

()

0 23

()

0 15 19/1A

0 19/1B

()

0 23 7/3

()

0 19/2

0 21 / 1A

082 21/1B

0 082

0 0

17 21/C

36 33/P

74 32/1

()

0 (0

36 32/2

45 (0

0 32/3

32/4

(0)

0 28

17 30/ 1A

31/P

() 36 (0

()

0 30/1B

0 17 30/2A

(0)

0 (0

30/2B

(0)

156/1

()

0 17

(0)

156/2

10 ()

0 (0)

0 17 156/3

156/4

()

0 161/1

0 24

0 16 161/2

()

() 19 161/3

(0 (0

20 161/4

()

15 166/ 1B

06 ()

166/2P

166/3P

()

15 166/ 1A

()

166/4A

16 166/4B

()

0 10 165/1A

0 165/ 1B

165/2

()

0 13

165/3

0 04

()

0 165/4

0 05 165/5

()

0 05 165/6

(0) 05 165/7

8 3

07 Total

Village: Vadali

6 0

24 3/P

09 6/5A

29/ 1P

2512

0000

0 0

11 6/5B

06 6/8P

06 0

32/ 12A

0 06 0

7/3A

05 0

7/3B

13 7/2

8/7

9/P

21 0

19 11/P

12/P

12 0

20/2P

14 20/1P

17 20/5P

53 22/ 1P

00000000000

23 31/2A

0 31/5A

(0 02

()

0 03 32/7A

()

32/ 7P

0 03

33/8A

03 32/8B

0 03 0

()

03 32/ 11A1

() 03 32/ 11B2

09 ()

81/ 1A

81/3P

(0)

()

132 ()

() 06 82/ 1B

07 82/6B

()

06 84/3 A

06 (0)

()

() 84/4A

()

(0 (0

03 85/7A

66/2A

()

(0) 05

() 67/2A

()

(0 08

70/1B1

()

02 70/2A1

()

() 04

70/3A1

(0 (04 70/4A1

()

(04 72/6* Govt (0

(0)

() 72/4* Govt 0

() 08 201/ 1C

(0)

08 69/ 1A

05 66/2A

(0)

() 65/ 1A

4 Total

55 Village: Chevuru

35/3

()

() 0

11 33/3C

(0)

()

10 36/2C

38/2C

()

(0 ()

05 0

Total

(0 41

[No. O- 12016/22/2005 -ONGD - IV] N. C. JAKHUP, Under Secy .

2056

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . MARCH 5,2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 752.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाइन: ' केसनपल्लि के. डब्ल्यू. डी.ए. और के.डब्ल्यू. ए.ए. ( 6 और 10 ) से जी.सी.एस. केसनपल्लि' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतदुपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः , अब, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन भूमि में उपयोग केअधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम , 1962 (.1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

वशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के. जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि , आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप में हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाइन केसनपल्लिके. डब्ल्यू.डी.ए. और के.डब्ल्यू.ए.ए. ( 6 और 10 ) से जी.सी.एस. केसनपल्लि राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश मंडल: मलिकिपुरम

गांव : केसनपल्लि सिवरु गोल्ल पालेम जिले: पुरव गोदावरी

आर.एस. नं.

एर्स सेंन्टएर्स

हेक्टेयर्स

एक्रर्स सेंन्ट्स 497

(0)

()

TOTAL

()

(0)

30 [फा. सं. ओ-12016/23/2005- ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ] एन. सी. जावृप, अवर सचिव New Delhi . the 23rd February, 2005

S.O. 752. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from "Kesanapalli KWDA and KWAA ( 6 and 10 ) to GCS Kesanapalli in the A.P. State pipeline should be laidby the Oil & Natural Gas CorporationLtd

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. Basın . Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry. Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

Rou flow line from Kesanapalli KWDA and KWAA (6 and 10) to GCS Kesanapalli

State : Andhra Pradesh District: East Godavari

Mandal: Malikipuram Village Gollapalem H/O Kesanapalli R.S. No. Hectares Arcs Centiares Acres Cents 497 0 TOTAL (0 12 12 () (0 () 0 30 30 [ F. No. O- 12016/23/ 2005 -O.N.G.D.-[V] N C ZAKHUP Under Secy नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 753.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाईन : ' एल.एस.ए.ए. से जी.सी.एस. नर्मापुर ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

अतः , अब, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोपित किया है :

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितवद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के.जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline . it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed hereto.

Now. therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land) Act . 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) . the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification . to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाईन: ' एल.एस.ए.ए. से जी.सी.एस. नर्सापुर मंडल: नर्सापुर

गांव: सरिर्पाल्ल जिला : पश्चिम गोदावरी

हेक्टेयर्स

एक्रर्स सेंन्ट्स

एर्स

आर.एस. नं.

सेन्टेएर्स

6 1

79 385

()

350

()

12 (0

1 03 349

()

02 336/24P ()

() ]

()

336/23P ( )

02 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2057

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

गांव: चिनमामिझिपल्लि

गांव : सरिपल्लि

5 1

()

0 (0

257/6

()

0 323/P

38 (0)

() 321/1

11/2 (0

321/1B

()

323/P

()

19 ()

320

(0)

()

280/3

() 07

279/1

(0 22 ()

()

279/2

() 32

()

287/2.3 (0

(0 27

()

288

() 73 286/2

(0) 30

()

286/3

()

(0) 40

() 70 195/2

() 70

196

() 268/2

()

07 269/2

()

(0 (0

(0 03 269/1

()

0 286/4

()

28 270/P

65 ()

()

267

261

()

(0 260/ 1P

()

19 256/3.4 ()

()

(09

260/2P ()

()

() 238/P

08 (0)

()

() 17 286/4

()

() 287/3,4 (0)

TOTAL

10 97% गांव: रुस्तुमबादा

()

1 178/ 1J , 2

002

186/ 1A , IC .

()

() 37 186/B

()

20 186/ IB

()

0 186/2J

()

() 186/21

()

08% (0

()

(0) 186/2H

052

()

186/2C

15 ()

53 177/12

()

136/1A

07% ()

()

(0 07% 135/3

137

()

(0 144/1

145/1,146/1C 0

()

(X)

148/2

24 ()

()

148/1

()

TOTAL 2

5 462 2

6 1

()

93 350

()

332/4

() 04

331/ 1B

()

325/1

() 50 ()

332/5

12 ()

324

()

() 30 195/3P

()

07 ()

195/2

()

() 03

195/1

(07 ()

()

(0)

78 .

183/1

(0)

140/2

24 (0

136

21 (0

()

386

22 406/3

()

57 138/3,2

115/ 1P

()

64 115/2

(0 46%

()

13 115/3

()

16 116/1

()

116/2

116/5

()

74/4

()

(0)

72 72/P

()

53 83

(0) 53 ()

()

73/3

15 (0

()

77 74/3

()

73/1

062

()

15 73/2

TOTAL

10 96 [सं. ओ-12016/24/2005-ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2005 S.O. 753. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " LSAA to GCS NARASAPUR ™ in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto .

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land) Act . 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification . to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. Basin, Godavari Bhavan . Base Complex . Rajahmundry . Andhra Pradesh .

2058

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5,2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

And every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in person or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM LSAA TO GCS /

NARASAPUR

State Andhra Pradesh

Mandal Narasapur District: West Godavari

Village Saripalli R.S. No. Hectares Ares Centiares Acres Cents 385

()

79 350

()

12 ()

349

03 336/24P ()

()

336/23P ()

257/6

()

38 323/P

321/1

()

004

11 ()

321/ 1B

()

48 323/P

()

19 (0)

320

()

55 ()

280/3

()

07 (0

()

279/1

22 ()

()

279/2

()

27 287/2.3 ()

()

( )

73 288

()

286/2

()

286/3

()

40 ( )

()

70 195/2

()

196

()

43 268/2

()

269/2

(0)

()

07 (0)

269/1

()

(01

()

286/4

18 (0)

()

28 270/P

267

()

(0)

53 261

()

260/ 1P

()

19 256/3,4 ()

260/2P

()

(0)

()

238/P

08 0

()

286/4

()

287/3,4 ()

27 TOTAL

10 972 Village : Rustumbada

178/ 1J.2

()

00%

()

37 186/ 1A, IC,

186/B

()

20 186/ 1B

()

06 186/2J

()

186/21

08%

PART 11-S ( ii )

() 186/2H

( )

()

054 ()

()

186/2C

( )

177/12

()

136/1A

()

07 135/3

()

07 :

137

()

(03

()

144/1

()

98 145/1 , 146/ IC ()

( )

(۲)

()

24 148/2

148/1

()

() H

TOTAL 2

46 Village: Chinamamidipalli

350

()

332/4

()

331/ IB

()

50 325/1

()

332/5

()

30 324

()

195/3P

()

03 195/2

()

07 195/1

()

78 183/1

()

(۲)

140/2

24 136

()

21 ()

()

386

()

(۲)

406/3

()

138/3.2

115/ 1P

()

115/2

115/3

()

116/1

()

96 116/2

()

116/5

21 74/4

()

53 72/P

()

73/3

()

74/3

()

73/1

()

06%

()

15 73/2

TOTAL

10 96 [No. O. - 12016/24/2005 -O.N.G.D. -IV ] N C. ZAKHUP . Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 754.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. ओ.यू. पाइप लाईन: एल.जी.डी.सी. से जी.सी.एस. लिंगाला तक पेट्रोलियम 2059 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification . to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. Basin . Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex. Rajahmundry. Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wished to be heard in person or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

FROM LGDC TO GCS LINGALA

ROU FLOW LINE State : Andhra Pradesh District: Krishna

Mandal :Mudinepalli Village: Perikigudem

Ares Centiares Acres Cents

R.S. No. Hectares

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति , उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग , राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के.जी. बेसिन,ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश को अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

883/3A

()

883/3B

883/4A

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप मे हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

()

883/4B

अनुसूची

()

883/4C

आर.ओ.यू.पाइप लाइन एल.जी.डी.सी. से जी.सी.एस. लिंगाला 883/4D

883/4E

()

(07

884/1P

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल: मुदिनेपल्लि गांव: पेरिकिगूडेम

884/2P

हक्टयर्स

सन्टीस

एसं

आर.एस. नं.

एकड़ सेंन्ट्रस

884/10P

()

( X)

()

(0) 883/3ए

884/4P

()

883/3वी

()

TOTAL

()

883/4ए

()

883/4बी

()

[No. O- 12016/25/ 2005 -O.N.G.D. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

()

883/4सी

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

()

883/4डी

()

883/4ई

( )

()

884/1 पी

()

884/2पी

()

884/10पी

का.आ. 755.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाईन: ई.एम.ए.ई. - 7सेऐंडमूरू -ई.पी.एस. तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

884/4पी

()

(03

()

TOTAL

[सं. ओ -12016/25/2005-ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi . the 23rd February, 2005

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग केअधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

S.O.754 . Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " LGDC toGCS LINGALA " in the A.P. State pipeline shouldbe laid by theOil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd:

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of layingsuch pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the rightof user in the landdescribed in the schedule annexed here to.

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति , उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग , राजमहेन्दि एसट/ के.जी. बेसिन, ओ. एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश को अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा।

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) . the Central Government

565 G1/05-9 2060

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5,2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाइन: ई .एम.ए.ई. - 7 से ऐंडमूरू- ई.पी.एस.

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: करपा जिला: पूर्वगोदावरी

गांव: पेद्दापुराप्पाडु

सेन्टस आर.एस. नं. हेक्टेयर्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एकड़ 67/2B

54 68/1B

13 68/ 1C

58 69/3B

45 70/2B

62/4B

(0)

17 0

()

62/3B

78 52/5A, 5B , 3B 0

97 TOTAL

गांव: पातर्लंगद्दा

()

65/5A

(0)

12 ()

65/5B

27 65/5C

()

13 65/7

()

67 142/3B

65/8B .

(0)

143/2B

()

30 143/ 1B

()

22 144/2Pt

74 190/Pt

25 192/ 1B

192/2

192/8

75 ()

()

193/Pt

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

6 0

15 312/8A

312/7Pt

04 312/6B

()

312/ 7Pt

08 (0

08 312/6A

05 (0

312/ 5C

05 0

()

312/5BPt

(02

312/5A

33 324/9APt

()

324/8APt

()

324/5A

()

324/4A

392/2A

328/6B

()

03 325/2A

()

15 32/5C4

()

04 0

328/5C3

(17 328/5A2

()

328/5C2#

08 0

()

(0)

(17

328/5A1

()

328/5C1

08 0

05 328/5B1

()

392/4Pt

(0)

24 (0

()

392/4Pt

35 (0

392/8BPt

35 0

()

324/9APt

324/8APt

()

42 0

()

27 392/ 1E1

()

392/ 1D1

()

22 392/ 1A1

()

90 0

391/ 9A, 9B

()

20 191/1

()

062 191/2

06 192/3

06 192/4

(0)

05 191/5

()

191/6

052 (0)

191/7

205/1

22 ()

(0)

()

07 210/Pt

11 205/2

TOTAL

77 गांव: वेमुलवाडा

()

(0)

21 308/2B

(0)

()

17 (0)

309/ 1BPt

()

310/ 7Pt

()

12 310/6BPt

()

391/ 6A

()

391/ 1A

()

10 391/3A

()

16 (0)

391/4A

()

12 (0

391 /5A

()

18 472/2B

()

28 472/ 1B

()

41 470/ 1B

()

470/2A

()

30 (0)

419/1

(0)

05 ()

()

436/1

()

432/3 , IB

()

433/2

()

434/2B

78 4

TOTAL

गांव: कोंगोडु

()

11 310/5BPt

()

23 311/2Pt

()

29 144/2

()

10 ()

144/ 1Pt [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2061

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

5 6

147/2

91 0

30 144/1Pt

07 0

145/4B

136/12

08 0

34 136/8A

136/ 6A

136/7Pt

02 0

04 136/2B

136/ 2A

14 0

135 /9A

135/5A

13 0

135/4A

17 135/2B

135/ 2A

03 0

135/ 1B

()

12 135/ 1A

127/6B

()

11 0

127/6A

10 123/3B

18 123/2B

13 0

15/6B1

08 0

15/6B2, 6A

30 15/5B Pt

15/5A Pt

15/4Pt

13 15/4Pt , 2Pt

land Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification. to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G .. Basin . Godavari Bhavan . Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : EMAE - 7 TO ENDAMURU- EPS

State : Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Karapa District : East Godavari

Village Patharllagadda &Gorri Pude S. No.

Hectares Ares Centiares Acres Cents .

65/5A

12 65/5B

()

27 (0

65/5C

()

13 0

65/7

( )

142/3B

67 65/8B

12 0

143/2B

30 0

33 143/1B

144/2Pt

Gorri Pude

15/3Pt

15 0

14/4B. 3A

52 0

15/3Pt

05 0

15/2BPt

09 15/2Pt

15/1Pt

15 0

15/6B, 4B

13/4A, 3B

15 0

15/1 Pt

13/4A, 3B

17 13/ 1B2

69 TOTAL

[सं. ओ -12016/26/2005- ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 755.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " EMAE - 7 to ENDAMURU - EPS " in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto :-

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users ) in the 0

190/Pt

25 192/ 1B

()

192/2

(0)

192/8

193/Pt

20 191/1

191/2

062

191/3

()

06 0

191/4

()

05 191/5

191/6

(0)

052

191/7

205/1

07 210/Pt

205/2

77 TOTAL

Village: Peddapurappadu

67/2B

13 68/ 1B

(0)

68/1C

58 0

45 69/3B

70/2B

0 09

22 62/4B

()

62/3B

52/5A, 5B . 3B 0

TOTAL

1 2062

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5,2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

1 Village Vemulavada

144/ IPt

308/2B

145/4B

(0)

()

17 309/ IBPt

136/12

0 07

0 310/7PL

136/8A

()

310/6BP1

136/6A

() 0

310/5BPt

136/ 7Pt

0 311/2Pt

136/2B

(0)

15 312/8A

136/2A

(0 0

312/ 7Pt

135/9A

312/6B

135/5A

(0 312/7P1

(0)

135/4A

0 0

()

312/6A

135/2B

05 312/5C

(0 0 02

135/2A

()

05 312/5BP

()

135/ IB

312/5A

05 (0

33 324/9APt

135/ 1A

()

324/8APL

()

127/6B

324/5A

()

127/6A

0 324/4A

123/3B

()

392/2A

(0)

123/2B

(0 328/6B

(0)

15/6B1

()

() 325 /2A

03 32/5C4

(0)

()

(0)

15/5B Pt

0 328/5C3

()

04 0 03

()

07 328/5A2

15/4 Pt

(0)

328/5C2#

() 03

()

08 ()

() 328/ 5A1

(07

15/3Pt

328/5C1

(0)

08 ()

()

42 324/8APt

392/ 1E1

()

15/3Pt

392/ 1D1

15/2B Pt

392/ 1A1

15/2Pt

()

(0 391/9A, 9B

15/1Pt

11 391 /6A

()

() 391 / 1A

40 (0)

()

10 391 /3A

15/1 Pt

()

391/4A

()

12 391/5A

13/1B2

()

472/2B

(07

(0)

18 ()

28 472/ IB

()

41 470/ IB

()

() 470/2A

(01

02 ()

() +19/1

+36/1

()

58 432/3, IB

433/2

()

65 ()

() 434/2B

78 TOTAL

Village: Kongodu

() ()

144/2

()

() 144/ IPt

10 ()

0 147/2

PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

(0)

()

30 0

()

34 0

()

04 (0

()

(02

04 04

()

11 0

()

13 05

(0)

()

17 01

03 0

0 03

12 0

11 04

10 0

()

13 09

()

22 03

15/6B2.6A

(0)

30 (0)

()

15/5A Pt

36 05

15/4PL . 2Pt

()

15 0

()

14/4B, 3A

()

(

(0)

05 ()

()

09 0

()

15 ()

15/6B, 4B

13/4A, 3B

(0)

30 12

13/4A, 3B

TOTAL

69 [No. O- 12016 /26/2005 -O.N.G.D. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 756.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाइन: केसनपल्लि ( वे ) 7 सेकेसनपल्लि जी.जी.एस. तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ;

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

2063 2

6 1

37% 564/2पी. 565/5पी 0

564/2पी, 565/5 पी 0

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोगके अधिकार का अर्जन, अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है :

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमिके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के.जी.बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाइन केसनपल्लि ( वे ) 7 से केसनपल्लि

(वे ) जी.जी.एस.

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: मामिडिकुदुरु

गांव : गोगन्नमटम सिवारु करवाका जिला: पूर्व गोदावरी

हेक्टेअर्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एकर्स सेंन्टस आर.एस. नं.

6 1

447/बी

0 09

59 0

446/ए 447/ए

1 .

439/ए445/ए

446/बी

45 0

438/ए

2 40% जोड़

मंडल: मलिकिपुरम गांव : केसनपल्लि

559/2ए/ 1पी

532/3पी

04 502/6पी

18 0

492/7पी

29 492/6पी

492/5बी

29 0

559/2/2

30 489/2ए/ 1

36 0

489/ 1ए

01 497/5ए

33 0

492/1बी

559/2B/पी

532/1पी

12 0

491/4पी

0 03

09 492/1ए

49 0 20

489/2ए/3

जोड़

गांव : केसनपल्लिसिवारू गोल्लमपलेम

34 569/ए

0 14

34 569/पी

37/2 564/2पी, 565/5 पी 0

37½ 552/बी

552/पीटी

552/जी

40 0

()

552/एफ

552/ई

0 8½ 0

552/डी

10 552/सी

62 0

552/बी

7/2

7½ 0

552/ए

555/जी

19 (0

555/एफ

0 182

555/ई

20 555/डी

()

09 555/सी

555/ए&बी

(0)

172

559/एफ

(0)

09% 0

559/ई

09% 559/डी

09% 0

559/सी

092 0

559/बी

0 092 0

559/ए

092 489/पी

15 (0

495/पी

872 जोड़

[सं. ओ -12016/ 27/2005- ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005

S.O. 756. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " Kesanapalli ( W) # 7 to Kesanapalli ( W) G.G.S. " in the A.P. state pipeline shouldbe laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .:

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto :-

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land) Act . 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) . the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification. to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G.. Basin , Godavari Bhavan. Base Complex, Rajahmundry. Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wished to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

2064

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : KESANAPALLI (W) # 7 TO KESANAPALLI (W) G.G.S.

State . Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Mamidikuduru District East Godavari

Village: Karawaka H/O

Gogannamatham R.S. No.

Ares

Cents Hectares

Centiares Acres 2

6 447/B

59 446/A , 447 /A 0

14 0

439/A , 445/A,

446/B

438/A

45 0

2 TOTAL

402 Village: Gollapalem H/ O Kesanapalli

569/A

34 0

34 569/B

372 564/2P, 565/5P ()

564/2P, 565 /5P 0 15

372

0 372 564/2P, 565 /5P 0

552/B

()

552/Pt

552/G

5 552/F

0 552/E

82 0

10 552/D

0 552/C

552/B

0 7/2 0

0 552/A

7/2

19 555/G

0 555 /F

182

20 555/E

0 08

09 555/D

0 555/C

0 555/A&B

172 0

0 559/F

092 ()

559/E

092

092 559/D

0 559/C

092 0

559/B

092

0 0

092 559/A

22 0

489/P

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

5 6

30 0

489/ 2A/ 1

36 489/ 1A

497/5A

01 0

33 492/ 1B

559/2B/P

532/ 1P

02 491/4P

09 492/ 1A

489/2A/3

85 1

TOTAL

[No. O- 12016/27/2005 -O.N.G.D. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 757.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाईन : "कैकलूरु 5 से लिंगाल 1 जी.जी.एस. ( द्वारा ) लिंगाल 8 " तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाईन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के.जि.बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या वह यह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू.पाइप लाईन: कैकलूरु 5 से लिंगाल 1 जी.जी.एस. (द्वारा ) लिंगाल 8

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

15 0

495/P

मंडल: मुदिनेपल्लि गांव: चिगुरुक्कोटा जिला: कृष्णा

872 TOTAL

Village: Kesanapalli

()

56 0

559/2A/ 1p

()

22 532/3p

()

04 0

502/6P

() 0

492/7P

0 0

29 492/6P

11 492/5B

29 0

559/2A/2

सेंन्टस

एकर्स

एर्स सेन्टेएर्स

हेक्टेर्स

आर.एस. नं.

()

012 186/3A2P

()

002 186/2D2P

()

01 0

186/2C2

()

022 186/ 1E1

()

01 186/2B2P [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2065

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005 /फाल्गुन 14, 1926

6 2

186/2A2P

01/2

01 186/ 1E4

03 186/ 1E3

186/ 1E2

02 0

187/2D2

06 187/2D1

187/ 1A2

16 188/2B3

07 0

188/2A3

07 189/7C1

189/6C1

06 0

189/2C1

03 189/ 1C1

08 365/ 1M3

365/ 1M2

365/ 1M1

012 0

05 188/2A4

188/ 1B1

214/ 1A

05 214/BP

213/2P

05 0

213/2P

05 0

199/3CP

12 0 00

01 199/3B1

163/ 1B

201/ 1A

0 20

160/1

04 0

161/2B

160/2

02 0

161/2A

161/1P

26 162/6P

162/5P

15 163/ 1E

163/3A

03 162/ 1P

163/3B

163/ 1A

0 07

163/1C

16 104/2C

104/2

46 0

106/P

109 /P

231/3

03 0

231/ 1,2

230/ 1P

02 0

228/P

215/2CP

20 0

215/2BP

TOTAL

572 [सं. ओ -12016/28/2005-ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 757. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " KAIKALUR # 5 TO LENGALA # 1 GGS ( via) LINGALA 8 " in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas CorporationLtd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of Users in the LandAct, 1962(50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : KAIKALUR # 5 TO LENGALA # 1 GGS (via) LINGALA 8 State : Andhra Pradesh District: Krishna

Mandal:Mudenepalli Village: Chigurukota R.S. No.

Acres Cents Hectares Ares Centiares

6 1

()

186/3A2P

012 0

186/2D2P

00%

186/2C2

()

186/ 1E1

02/2

01 186/2B2P

()

186/ 2A2P

012 0

186/ 1E4

186/1E3

186/ 1E2

02 0

187/2D2

187/2D1

06 0

187/1A2

16 0

188/2B3

03 188/ 2A3

189/7C1

189/6C1

189/2C1

189/1C1

03 0

08 365/ 1M3

13 365/ 1M2

365/ 1M1

012 0

188/2A4

05 2066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5,2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

188/ 1B1

05 0

214/1A

11 214/BP

05 0

213/2P

()

05 213/2P

()

05 0

199/3CP

12 199/3B1

01 163/ 1B

26 0

201/ 1A

51 0

160/1

04 0

(0)

161/2B

()

160/2

02 0

161 /2A

161/ 1P

16 162/6P

26 0

162/5P

15 163/1E

()

163 /3A

03 162/ 1P

14 0

163/3B

()

163/1A

163/ 1C

104/2C

16 104/2

0 46 106/P

04 109/P

12 231/3

03 0

231/1.2

230/ 1P

228/P

()

215/2CP

20 0

()

215/2BP

10 (0

215/2BP

TOTAL

5 57/2

[No. O- 12016/28/ 2005 -O.N.G.D. - IV] N. C. JAKHUP , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 758.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाइपलाईन: ' के.वी.ऐ.जी. से मोरी-ई.पी.एस. ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाईन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन , अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के. जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यु.पाइपलाईन: के .वी.ऐ.जी. से मोरी-ई.पी.एस.

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: सखिनेटिपल्लि

गांव : अंतर्वेदि सिवारु अतर्वेदिकरा जिले: पूरब गोदावरी

हेक्टोर्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एक्रर्स सेंन्टस आर.एस. नं.

(0)

17/2 667/4pt

(0)

669/A

( )

669/B

()

669/C

(0 07/2

062 672/1 pt

672/B

292 0

18 672/pt

(0)

122 672/pt

TOTAL

24/2 [सं. ओ -12016/29/2005-ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 758. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleuin from " KVAG TO MORI- EPS" in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :--

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein :

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objections shali also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

2067

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : KVAG TO MOR - EPS State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal : Sakhinetipalli District : East Godavari

Village: Antervedi Kara

H/ O Antervedi

Ares Centiares Acres Cents R.S. No. Hectares

17/2 667/4 pt

23 669/A

669/B

669/C

07/2

0 062 672/1 pt

672/B

0 292 0

18 672/pt

12/2 672/pt

TOTAL

1 242

[No. O- 12016/29/2005 -O.N.G.D. -IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy.

6 2

18 416/1A

420/11

19 0

14 510/ 1A

510/B

05 0

429/ 1A

429/1B

11 0

432/1

17 0

432/2

433/3A

433/ 1A

06 436/3PT

23 0

436/2PT

13 0

435/1B2

435/1B1

0 02

0 05 0

25 435/ 1A1

434/Pt,

(Govt. Land)

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

का.आ. 759.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाइपलाईन: ' के.डब्ल्यू.डी.जी. से केसनपल्लि जी.जी.एस. ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाईन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन, अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एत‌द्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के.जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमीटेड, गोदावरी भवन , राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐखा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू.पाइपलाईन: के.डब्ल्यू.डी.जी. सेकेसनपल्लि जी.जी.एस.

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: मलीकिपुरम

गांव: केसनपल्लि जिले: पूरब गोदावरी

हेक्टेर्स एर्स सेन्टएर्स एक्रर्स सेंन्टस आर.एस.नं.

6 1

16 574/p

42 416/1B

04 416/2

565 G1 /05-10

09 497/3pt

12 TOTAL

[सं. ओ -12016/30/2005- ओ . एन . जी. डी.- IV] एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2005 S.O. 759. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " KWDG TO KESANAPALLI GGS" in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

Andwhereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of Users in the land Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan, Base complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE ROU FLOW LINE FROM : KWDG TO KESANAPALLI GGS

State : Andhra Pradesh District: East Godavari

Mandal:Malikipuram Village: Kesanapalli R.S. No.

Ares Centiares Acres Cents Hectares

6 2

16 574/p

42 416/1B

17 2068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5,2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

अनुसूची

416/2

आर.ओ.यु. पाइप लाईन लिंगाला 11 से जी.सी.एस. II लिंगाला 07

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

416/1A

मंडल: मुदिनेपल्लि 0

420/11

जिले: कृष्णा

गांव: पेरिकीगूडेम

510/ 1A

हेक्टोर्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एक्रर्स सेंन्टस

आर.एस. नं.

510/ IB

831/2

835/ 1A

10 5

429/1A

()

835/ 1B

15 429/1B

835/1C

432/1

()

836/6B

0 ()

432/2

836/6C

052 (0)

433/3A

850/ 1B

()

12 433 /1A

850/2B

()

850/3B

0 436/3PT

(0)

852/ 1B

()

12 0

436/2PT

852/3B

15 05

435/1B2

872/6B

(0)

39 (0

435/ 1B1

0 05

871/6C

09 (0

()

435/1A1

871/5C

07 (0

871/4P

()

(0 434/Pt .

(0)

(0) (Govt . Land)

871/11B

871/14B

497/3pt

877/ 1A1

TOTAL

877/ 1A2

()

877/ 1BP

0 03

878/3P

[No. O- 12016/30/2005-O.N.G.D. -IV] N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy .

876/2

()

(0)

884/7A

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

TOTAL

132

[सं. ओ-12016/31/2005- ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2005 का.आ. 760.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाइप लाईन : ' लिंगाला 11 से जी.सी.एस. II लिंगाला ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

S.O. 760. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that forthe transport of petroleum from " LINGALA 11 TO GCS II LINGALA" in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to:-

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन , अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय . सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाईन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/के. जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification . to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G .. Basin . Godavari Bhavan. Base complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्टतः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत । [ भाग-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2069

भारत काराजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM : LINGALA 11 TO GCS II

LINGALA

State : Andhra Pradesh

Mandal:Mudenepalli District: Krishna

Village: Perikigudem R.S. No. Hectares Acres Centiares Acres Cents 831/2

835/ 1A

15 0

835/1B

835/1C

05 836/6B

836/6C

052

850/ 1B

()

06 850/2B

()

850/3B

06 852/1B

12 0

852/3B

872/6B

39 0

871/6C

09 0

07 871/5C

871/4P

()

13 0

871/ 11B

03 (0)

871/14B

877/1A1

38 और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यु. पाईपलाईन: अडविपालेम 1 ई . पी. एस से केसनपल्लि ( वे ) जी. जी. एस

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

राज्य:

मंडल: मलिकिपुरम पूर्व गोदावरि

जिले:

गांव: संकरगुप्तम हेक्टेयर्स एर्स

सेंन्टस आर . एस. नं .

एक्रर्स

सेंन्टे एर्स

611/ IB

46 611/ 1A

()

607/3H

()

15 0

()

607/3G

607/3E

04 607/3B

()

607/3F

()

607/3C

15 0

607/3D

(03

()

607/3 A

()

80 0

Total

गांव : केसनपल्लि

877/ 1A2

877/ 1BP

08 0 03

878/3P

876/2

05 0

19 884/7A

TOTAL 1

132

[No. O- 12016/31 /2005 -O.N.G.D. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 761.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. ओ. यु. पाईप लाईन :' अडविपालेम 1 ई. पी. एस से केसनपल्लि ( वे ) जी. जी. एस ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवाहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एत‌द्याबद अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है । अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का आर्जन अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

588/P

32 587/P

54 0

13 596/ 1P

05 1000

596/4P

33.

597/3P

28 0

2 0

66 597/ 1P

5 598/P

59 2

5 599/1

600 /P

579/P

()

34 414/2P

( )

()

596/3P

05 ()

( )

()

05 597/4P

48/3P

()

06 0

48/1A

()

11 (0

()

48/ IB

()

44/ 1A

26 ()

()

10 25/4J

( )

()

06 25/4H

( )

(12

()

( )

03 25/ 7P

()

06 48/2D

43 ()

()

48/1C

()

48/2A

04 0

43 48/1F

()

48/2G

()

(07

25/4/1

()

25/4E

( )

()

48/ 1D

30 0

12 48/2E

15 0

24/2 2070

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

5 1

05 0

0 24/3P

48/1E

()

06 48/2F

48/ 1H

0 (0

0 48/2B

06 0

06 48/2C

(0)

48/2H

52 0

25 47/3

60 47/2

0 47/1

46/1D

30 46/1B

0 44/1C

25 46/ 1A

44/ 1B

25/4G

(0)

03 42/6P

(0)

0 42/5P

0 42/4P

13 ()

42/ ID

()

07 42/ 1C

( )

14 ()

0 42/2

42/ 1B

()

42/1 A

() 25/4F

()

(02

() ()

10 25/4A

()

25/4D

()

0 ()

06 25/4B

()

(017

() 25/1 A

18 25/4C

()

06 ()

() 24/ 1P

( )

(04

11 ()

15 24/2

(0)

05 24/3P

()

() 25/ 1B

05 ()

0 23/4P

46/1C

(0)

19 ()

16 48/ 1G

13 Total

गांव: केसनपल्लि

()

(0)

(0 497/3 A

(0)

22 (0

(07

(0)

19 497/3B

()

29 435/ 1D1

() ()

435/ 1D/2

433/3A

() (0)

()

(0 433/3B

22 ()

62 433/4A

()

74 432/P

()

45 429/ IP

0 510/ 1P

()

0 510/2P

()

515/ 1A1

22 515/ 1A2 ()

(09

(0 ()

51 419/2P

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

04 419/3P

419/1

0 0

419/4

18 420/8

0 420/9

0 420/7

18 420/6

0 420/4

26 0

420/5

13 0

413/3

420/3

09 0000

420/2

420/1

43 0

0 413/6

17 413/5

0 413/4

() (0)

413/2

413/1

()

28 0

()

414/3A

05 ()

()

(02

414/3B

()

49 414/ IP

() 0

26 411/P

(07

4 Un Surveyed/ 2 1

427/P

()

Total

[सं. ओ 12016/32/2005 ओ. एन. जी. डी. IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February . 2005 S.O. 761. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " ADA VIPALEM I EPS TO KESANAPALLI ( W) GGS in the A. P. State pipeline should be laid by the OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.;

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here 10:-

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land Act . 1962 (50 of 1962 ) . the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user thercin Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex. Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2071

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005 /फाल्गुन 14, 1926

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM ADAVIPALEM 1 EPS TO KESANAPALLI(W) GGS

State : Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Malikipuram District: East Godavari

Village:

06 48/2B

()

0 0

06 48/2C

48/2H

Sankaraguptam

R.S. No. Hectares Areas Centiares Acres Cents 1

6 2

5 0

0 611/1B

46 0

611 / 1A

607/3H

15 0

607/3G

11 607/3E

04 607/3B

607/3F

10 0

15 607/3G

607/3D

607/3A

80 TOTAL

1 Village: Kesanapalli B IT - II

37 588/P

1 0

587/P

0 596/ 1P

82 596/4P

0 0

597/3P

66 0

597/ 1P

0 2

5 598/P

59 599/1

66 600/P

3 0

579/P

49 0

0 414/2P

34 596/3P

0 0

597/4P

06 48/3P

0 0

11 48/ 1A

48/ 1B

13 0

44/ 1A

25/4J

06 25/4H

25/ 7P

06 0

48/2D

48/1C

0 0

0 48/2A

04 0

43 48/1F

0 0

48/2G

17 0

254/1

0 0

25/4E

22 48/ 1D

30 0

0 0

48/2E

15 24/2

0 24/3P

19 48/ 1E

0 48/2F

37 48/ 1H

47/3

(0 47/2

26 47/1

46/ 1D

0 46/ 1B

44/1C

0 46/ 1A

25 0

03 44/1B

0 0

25/4G

03 42/6P

03 0

11 42/5P

13 42/4P

0 42/1D

(0 42/ 1C

14 0

(0 42/2

43 42/ 1B

42/ 1A

0 25/4F

25/4A

08 25/4D

06 25/4B

18 0

0 25/ 1A

25/4C

0 0

11 24/1P

15 0

24/2

0. 0

05 24/3P

(0) 25/1B

09 23/4P

46/ 1C

000

16 0

48/ 1G

TOTAL 13

Village: Kesanapalli B IT - I

22 497/3A

19 0

497/3B

435/ 1D/ 1

29 435/ 1D/ 2 0

18 0

433 /3A

0 0

433/3B

62 0

433/4A

74 432/P

45 429/ 1P

0 510/ 1P

0 510/2P

30 0

0 515/ 1A/ 1

515/ 1A/2 0

22 0

0 419/2P

51 419/3P

04 419/1

02 0

419/4

420/8

00000

18 2072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

5 420/9

420/7

19 (0

420/6

18 0

420/4

26 0

420/5

413/3

13 ()

420/3

420/2

21 0

420/4

(0)

10 0

413/6

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 1

156/4P

20 156/6A

()

08 0

156/6B

07 0

296/2C

11 293/ 1PT

38 263/PT

Total

60 गांव : काल्लपालेम

413/5

413/4

23 0

0 413/2

15 413/1

70 414/3A

414/3B

05 0

414/1P

49 0

0 411/P

4 Un Surveyed/2 1

427/P

38 5

63 Total

[No. O- 12016/ 32 /2005 -O.N.G.D. -1V]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 762.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. ओ. यू. पाईपलाइन : ' के. के. ऐ. जी. से कैकलूरु 12 ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदूत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के.जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लि, गोदावरी भवन, राजमुहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाइन: के. के. ऐ. जी. से कैकलूरु -12 राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: कैकलूरु

गांव : राचप्रट्टनम कृष्णा

जिला:

आर . एस. नं. हेक्टोन्स एर्स सेंन्टे एर्स एक्रर्स सेंन्टस

6 1

03 0

157/2A

0 0

03 157/2B

19/1

(0)

02 0

Total

[सं. ओ-12016/33/2005-ओ. एन. जी. डी.- [V ] एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2005

S.O. 762. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from K.K.A.G.to KAIKALUR - 12 " in the A. P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here- to :-

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification. to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd .. Rajahmundry Asset/K.G.. Basin . Godavari Bhavan. Base complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh.

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM ; KKAG TO KAIKALUR- 12 State : Andhra Pradesh Mandal: Kaikaluru District : Krishna

Village: Rachapatnam R.S. No.

Acres Cents Hectares Arcs CentiAres

6 1

03 0

(0)

157/2A

()

03 157/2B

156/4P

20 0

()

(0)

156/6A

156/6B

07 0

(0)

296/2C

()

38 293/ 1PT

()

263/PT

60 0

Total 2073 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

laidby the Otl & Natural Gas CorporationLtd.

Village: Kallapalem

19/1

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here- to :-

Total

[No. O. - 12016/33/2005 -O.N.G.D. -IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2005

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land Act, ) 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

का.आ. 763.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर . ओ. यू. पाईपलाईन : ' पासर्लपूडि -28 से पासर्लपूडि-18 i /c ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . , Basin , Godavari Bhavan, Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh.

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतद्‌द्याबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM PASARLLAPUDI- 28 TO PASARLLAPUDI - 18 I/ C

State: Andhra Pradesh District: East Godavari

Mandal:Mamdikuduru Village: Pasarllapudi अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदूत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एत‌द्वारा घोषितकिया है ।

R.S. No.

Centiares Acres Cents

Hectares Ares

299 /A

03/2

304/3B

304/3A

23 बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमहेन्द्रि एसट/ के.जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लि. , गोदावरी भवन, राजमहेन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

304/4

14 1/2

303/1A1

303/2B

09/2

303/2C

0 अनुसूची

Total

0 92 1/2 आर.ओ.यूपाइपलाइन: पासर्लपूढि-28 से पासर्लपूढि-18

[No. O- 12016/34/2005 -O.N.G.D. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश जिला: पूर्व गोदावरी

मंडल: मामिडिकुकुरू गांव: पासर्लपूढि

सेंन्टस

सेंन्टे एर्स एक्रर्स

आर. एस. नं. हेक्टोन्स एर्स

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005 4

299/A

03 1/2

304/3B

304/3A

0 14/1/2

304/4

का.आ. 764.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. ओ. यू. पाइपलाइन : ' पी. वी. डी. बी. से पोन्नमंड ई. पी. एस. तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवाहन के लिये पाइपलाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

303/ 1A1 0

303/2B

303/2C

091/2

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए एतद्‌द्याबद अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

Total

921/2

[सं. ओ-12016/34/2005- ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार 'ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक S.O. 763. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " Pasarllapud I - 28 to Pasarllapud I - 18 I / C " in the A. P. State pipeline should be 2074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमुन्द्रि , एसट/ के. जि. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमुन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या वह यह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइपलाइन पी.ओ.डी.बी. से पोन्नमंड ई. पी. एस.

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: राजोल

गांव: पोन्नमंड जिला: पूर्व गोदावरी

आर. एस. नं. हेक्टेयर्स एर्स सेंन्टे एर्स एकर्स सेंन्टस 1

0 544/2B

12 544/3C

10 544/ 1B

(0)

0 24/1/2

0 543/1B

35 (0

513/5B

23 513/2B

15 1/2

513/3B

()

5134B

21 0

13 513/ 1D

513/ IC

07 (0

(0 513/1B

151/2 ()

5144/B

0 221/2 (0

0 514/3B

07 1/2 514/2B

()

(0)

514/ 1B

26 1/2 515/1A

(0 43/1/2

0 515/P

261/2 515/ 1B

(0)

24 (0)

(0 09 1/9 494/11B

()

10 494/9B

494/8B

(0 101/2 ()

0 491/7B

10 ()

494/6B

11 0

0 494/5B

() 09 1/2 494/4B

(0)

()

07 494/2B

()

0 041/2 494/3B

(0 ()

07 1/2

494/ 1A

0 121/2

491/4D

(0)

()

80 491/4C

(0)

489.490

()

(0)

497/2

()

Total

84 2

[सं. ओ-12016/35/2005- ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2005 S.O. 764.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from PODB TO PONNAMANDA EPS " in the A.P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] , And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necesary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

Nowtherefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users ) in the land Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares it is intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan . Base Complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner .

SCHEDULE ROU FLOW LINE FROM : PODB TO PONNAMANDA EPS

State : Andhra Pradesh District: EastGodavari

Mandal :Razole Village: Ponnamanda R.S. No.

Ares

Acres Cents Hectares

Centiares

544/2B

()

544/3C

544/ 1B

241/2

35 543/ 1B

513/5B

()

15 1/2 513/2B

02 513/3B

513/4B

13 0

513/1D

()

07 513/ 1C

()

151/2 513/ 1B

5144/B

221/2 0

514/3B

071/2

()

11 514/2B

261/2

514/ 1B

515/ 1A

0 431/2

515/P

261/2 0

(0)

515/ 1B

()

494/11B

09 1/2

()

494/9B

()

(0)

101/2 494/8B

()

494/7B

004

()

494/6B

11 ()

()

494/5B

494/4B

09 1/2

494/2B

07 0

()

494/3B

04 1/2

071/2

()

494/1A

()

121/2

491/4D

80 0

491/4C

()

489,490

()

497/2

(0)

()

84 Total

[No. O- 12016/35 /2005 -O.N.G.D. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2075

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन14, 1926

नईदिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 765.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. ओ. यू. पाइप लाइन : ' ऐल. जी. डी. डी. से जी. सी. एस. लिंगाला ' तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित कने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी, तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजमुहन्द्रि एसट/ के.जी. बेसिन, ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, गोदावरी भवन, राजमुहन्द्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 23 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति विनिर्दिष्ट्तः यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या वह यह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाईप लाईन: एल. जी. डी. डी. से जी. सी. एस. लिंगाला राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: मुडिनेपल्लि गांव: चिगुरूकोटा जिला: कृष्णा

हेक्टेर

आर. एस. नं.

एकर्स सेंन्टस

एर्स सेन्टेएर्स

6 1

0 0

377/3B2

14 377/3B1

15 367/ 1A1

0 0

06 367/1A2

60 योग

0 [सं. ओ -12016/36/2005- ओ. एन. जी. डी.- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2005 S.O. 765. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " LGDD TO GCS LINGALA " in the A. P. State pipeline should be laid by the OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.; Andwhereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to;

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it's intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Provided that any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh;

565 G1 /05-1

And every person making such an objections shall also state specifically whether he wised to be hear in persons or by legal Practitioner.

SCHEDULE

ROU FLOW LINE FROM LGDD TO GCS LINGALA State : Andhra Pradesh

Mandal:Mudinepalli District : Krishna

Village: Chigurukota

Ares Centiares Acres Cents R.S. No. Hectares

25 0

377/3B2

14 377/3B1

15 0

367/ 1A1

367/1A2 0

60 0

0 TOTAL

[No. O- 12016/36/2005 -O.N.G.D. -IV] N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

का.आ. 766.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में आवश्यक है कि आन्द्र प्रदेश राज्य में ईस्ट गोदावरी जिला में ओदालारेवु वेन्दामुर्लनका कोमारागिरिपात्नम , थुम्मालापाल्लि, गुनदुपुदि, सामन्थाकुरु , देवागुप्ताम, छाल्लापाल्लि ओर सूरासेना यानाम गाव द्वारा ओदालारेवू से सूरासेना या नाम तक आयिल के परिवहन के लिये आयिल ओर नेचुरल गैस कार्पोरेशन द्वारा पाईपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और कि ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जित करना आवश्यक है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय कीघोषणा करती है;

उक्तअनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दिये जाने की तारीख से 21 ( इक्कीस ) दिनों के भीतर, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि में पाईपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में आक्षेप लिखित रूप में कामतेन्त आथोरिटी ( अरो . वू उऊ ) , ऑयल एण्ड नैचुरल गैस कार्पोरेशन, के. जी. बेसिन परियोजना, लालदेर्यु, राजमुन्डी, आन्ध प्रदेश को कर सकेगा ।

अनुसूची ऑयल नेचुरल गैस कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड ऊदलारेवु थक से यानाम ऑयल पाइपलाइन जिला

उ. का. अ. के मण्ड्ल गांव सर्वे ने. सब- डिविजन ने लिए अर्जित

कीजाने वाली

भूमि

(हैक्टेयर में)

787

पुर्वा आल्लावा- ऊदलारेवु

गोदावरी राम

786

0.025

787

0.25 2076

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii)] 1

1 2 3

789

पुर्वा

0.03

100

0.085

आल्लावा- बेबदाम-

आल्लावा- ऊदलारेवु

पुर्वा

राम

799

गोदावरी

0.24

राम

ऊरलान्का 101/1

0.03

गोदावरी

800/2

0.01

101/2

-0.31 800/5

0.015

103

0.03 800/9

0.05

104/1

0.15 800/10

0.05

104/4

0.12 802

0.24

115/1

0.07 803/1

0..02

0.075

115/2

803/2

0.025

0.005

115/3

803/7

0.15

116/3

0.1 803/9

0.02

0.115

121/3

803/10

0.055

0.13

121/4

803/11

0.015

0.01

122

804/1

0.095

0.105

123/1

804/2

0.13

0.015

124

820/1

0.115

0.125

135/1

820/2

0.01

135/2

0.115

0.155

821

0.01

136/1

822/1

0.03

0.17

136/2

822/2

0.095

0.16

137/1

823

0.025

137/3

0.015 947/1

0.13

0.01

137/4

947/2

0.05

0.075

138

949/2

0.215

0.2

168

963/4

0.025

169

0.13 971/2

0.115

172

0.115 972

0.575

0.07

697/1

979

0.48

697/3

0.135 981/1

0.05

697/4

0.045 981/2

0.07

0.04

697/5

0.055

981/5

697/6

0.08 981/7

0.01

697/7

0,075 981/8

0.265

714/5

0.185

0.01

0.05 981/9

715/6

988

0.115

0.045

716/7

987

0.475

0.115

717/1

969

0.08

0.085

717/2

962

0.09

0.185

718/5

970

0.08

0,075

723

724

0.395 योग

4.97

4.18

योग

0.035

82/1

आल्लावा बेबदाम-

पुर्वा

गोदावरी राम

ऊरलंका 82/2

0.06

0.415

कोमारागिरि- 1268

आल्लावा

पात्नाम

0.235 82/3

राम

1269

पुर्वा गोदावरी

0.045

0.04 82/5

0.055

1270

0.15 83/1

0.03

1442/1

0.055

1442/2

98/2

0.05

0.01 98/3

0.005

1442/3

98/4

1457/1

0,105

0.055

0.035 98/5

0.065

1457/2

99/1

1457/3

0.18

0.01

1458/1

0.1 99/3

0.075

99/4

1458/2

0.3

0.065

0.03 99/5

0.075

1459

99/6

1462/1

0.035

0.03 2077 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14, 1926

0.105

आल्लावा कोमारागिरि- 1462/2

पुर्वा

0.115

पुर्वा

1242/3

आल्लावा- गुनदुपुदि

राम

1463

0.03

गोदावरी

पात्नाम

0.075

राम

गोदावरी

1247/5

1466/2

0.195

1247/8

0.07 1467

0.115

1250

0.37

1271/1

0.06

2.02

योग

0.18

1271/2

0.05

पुर्वा आल्लावा- तुम्मपाल्लि 173

0.16

1271/3

गोदावरी

200/1

0.235

राम

0.08

1274/1

200/2

0.075

0.03

1274/2A

0.09

201/ 1A

1274/2B

0.115 204

0.235

1275/4

0.115 325/3

0.15

1275/5

0.115

0.105

325/4

1275/8

0.125 325/5

0.03

0.035

1275/11

326/1

0.075

0.035

1275/12

326/2

0.035

5.855

0.03

341/1

योग

341/2

0.08

0.115

593

पुर्वा आल्लावा- गुनदुपुदि

341/3

0.02

0.375

राम

605

गोदावरी

0.135

341/4

606

0.05 342/5

0.03

608/2

0.05 342/6

0.125

0.085

608/3

344

0,03

0.005

609/1

346

0.02

609/2

0.045 348/1

0.17

610

0.015 348/2

0.01

611

0.16 361/1

0.11

683/2

0,215 361/2

0.12

684/1

0.16 362/3

0.115

685

0.03 364/1

0.015

0.035

689/1

364/2

0.08

689/2

0.18

0.095

364/3

690/2

0,265 364/4

0.015

691/1

0.02 376

0.04

691/2

0.07

0.05

377

692/1

0.115 381/2

0.025

0.01

692/3

381/3

0.01

0.125

698/1

382/1

0.035

0.06

698/2

0.04

382/2

0.075

699/2

382/3

0,035

700/4

0.115 382/4

0.045

0.245

701/1

383

0.22

702

0.4 385/4

0.03

2.185

योग

386

0,03

387/1

0.1

0.355

पुर्वा आल्लावा- सामान्थाकुर्रु 45/1

387/2

0.07

0.4

गोदावरी राम

45/4A

388

0.085

0.015

45/5

380

0.295

0.075

66/1

1214

0.295

66/2

0.045 1215/2

0.13

66/3

0.045 1215/3

0.18

67/1

0.01 1215/4

0.095

67/2

0.125

0.035

1215/5

0.115

0.09

1241/1

योग

1.185 1242/2

0.115 2078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

0.045 पुर्वा

503

आल्लावा- देवागुष्थाम

पुर्वा

राम

505

गोदावरी

0.03

506/1

0.175

0.035

508/2

0.07

508/3 A

0.075

508/3B

508/3C

0.045

507

0.065

509

0.065

0.085

518

519/2

0.03

0.055

524/1

525/3

0.2

527/1

0.185

540

0.37

0.035

541/1

0.12

541/4

0.025

541/5

541/6

0.025

544

0.005

0.025

545

0.095

546/1

0.225

546/2

0.05

564

565/3

0.005

565/4B

0.05

565/4C

0.02

0.055

505/4D

0.095

565/6A

0.01

566/1

0.085

566/2

0.01

567/1

0,055

568/1A

0.055

568/ 1B

0.045

0.055

568/ 1C

0.055

568/2

568/4

0.005

569/1

0.065

569/2

0.55

569/3

569/4

0.06

0.09

570/1

570/2

0.145

3.455 योग

0.245 उप्पाला- छाल्लापाल्लि 48

पुर्वा

0.28 गोदावरी

गुप्तम

0.135

0.07

0.35

354/1

0.015

354/2

0.01

354/4

0.085

354/5

0.065 11

[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

5 1

0.04 उप्पाला- छाल्लापाल्लि 354/6

गोदावरी

354/12

0.075 गुप्तम

354/14

0.02

354/15

0.05

0.005

354/16

0:01

354/21

0.085

355/1

0.08

355/6

0.065

355/7

0.015

356/2

358

0.03

359/2

0.1

0.125

359/3

366/4

0.135

0.34

366/5

0.05

370/5

0.065

370/6A

0.075

370/6B

0.055

370/8

0.055

370/10

0.135

371

0.045

376/1

0.17

376/5

0.035

376/6

0.005

376/7

0.14

376/9

377

0.8

0.04

395/1

0.02

395/3

395/2

0.02

0.045

395/4

0.015

395/5

395/6

0.01

0.045

395/7

0.13

395/8

0.1

395/9

0.01

398/2

0.145

401/1

0,045

401/2B

0.025

401/4

0.005

402/1

0055

402/2

0.05

403

0.01

405/14

0.105

405/15

0.385

406

0.05

411

408

0.155

0.085

413

0.055

415/2

415/3

0.06

0.17

416/1

416/2

0.095

0,055

416/3 2079 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

416/6

छाल्लापाल्लि

0.16

उप्पाला-

पुर्वा

416/7

0.015

गोदावरी गुप्तम

504

0.155

User in the lands in 1. Odalarevu 2. Bendamurlanka 3. Komaragiripatnam 4. Tummalapalli 5. Gundupudi 6. Samanthakurru 7. Devaguptam 8. Challapalli 9. S. Yanam Villages described in the Schedule annexed to this Notification.

517/10

0,065

517/11

0.04

0.07

517/12

0.115

517/13

0.095

518/1

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -section (i) of Section 3 of the Petroleum andMinerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in the Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

0.055

518/4

0,055

518/5

0.03

518/6

0.01

518/8

0.06

518/10

518/11

0.22

0.005

518/12

0.07

519/1A

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within 21 days from the date on which the copies of this Notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public , object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority , ONGC Ltd. , K.G. Basin, Base Complex, Rajahmundry -533106. Andhra Pradesh

0.035

519/1B

SCHEDULE

0.285

519/3

ONGC Ltd.

520

0.115

ODALAREVU G.C.S. TO S. YANAM 521

0.07

522

0.06

Distt. Mandal Village

7.665

योग

Survey No./ Sub Division No.

0.035

119

पुर्वा उप्पाला- सूरासेना

Land to be acquired forR.O.U. (inHectres) यानाम

0.005

120/7A

गोदावरी गुप्तम

1 2

5 120/8

0.085

130/2A

0.01

0.02

East- All-

Odalarevu 785

130/2B

0.13

786

Godavari avaram

0.025 130/3

0.04

787

0.25

0.04

130/4

788

0.135

0.105

131/1

789

0.03

0.005

132/2

799

0.24

0.045

132/3

800/2

0.01

0.06

132/4

800/5

0.015 132/5

0.03

800/9

0.05 133

0.16

800/10

0.05

0.03

136/2

802

0.24 136/4

0.03

803/1

0..02 136/6

0.01

0.005

803/2

0.155

136/7

0.15

803/7

137

0.16

0.02

803/9

158

0.36

0.055

803/10

164

0.01

803/11

0.01

0.105

804/1

योग

1.505

804/2

0.13 [सं. ओ -12016/37/2005- ओ.एन.जी.डी.- IV]

820/1

0.115

820/2

0.01 एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

0.155

821

New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2005

822/1

0.17

822/2

0.16

823

0.025

947/1

0.13

947/2

0.05 S. O. 766.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthe transportation of Petroleum from Odalarevu GCS to S. Yanam of East Godavari District in Andhra Pradesh State a pipeline should be laid by the ONGC Ltd.

949/2

0.215 And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the Right of 2080

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

1 2 3 4

5 East- All-

963/4

0.025

Odalarevu

Godavari avaram

971/2

0.115

972

0,575

979

0.48

981/1

0.05

981/2

0.07

981/5

0.055

981/7

0.01

0.265

981/8

0.01

981/9

988

0.115

0.475

987

969

0.08

962

0.09

970

0.08

4.97 TOTAL

0.035 East- All- Bendamurl - 82 / 1

82/2

0.06

anka

Godavari avaram

82/3

0,045

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 1

East- All-

Bendamurl - 169

0.13

0.115

Godavari avaram anka

172

697/1

0,07

0.135

697/3

0.045

697/4

697/5

0.04

697/6

0.08

697/7

0.075

0.185

714/5

0.05

715/6

0.045

716/7

0.115

717/1

0.085

717/2

0.185

718/5

0.075

723

0.395

724

4.18 TOTAL

0.415

East- All- Komaragi- 1268

0,235

Godavari avaram

0.055

82/5

8/1

0.03

98/2

0.05

0.005

98/3

0.055

98/4

98/5

0.065

0.01

99/1

0.075

99/3

99/4

0.065

99/5

0.075

99/6

0.03

100

0.085

0.03

101/1

0.31

101/2

103

0.03

104/1

0.15

104/4

0.12

0.07

115/1

0.075

115/2

0.025

115/3

116/3

(0.1

0.115

121/3

0.13

121/4

122

0.015

(0,095

123/1

124

0.015

0.125

135/1

135/2

0.115

136/1

0.01

136/2

0.03

0.095

137/1

137/3

0.015

137/4

0.01

0.075

138

168

0.2

1269

ripatnam

(0.04

1270

0.15

1442/1

0.055

1442/2

0.01

1442/3

0.105

1457/1

0.035

1457/2

0.18

1457/3

1458/1

0.1

0.3

1458/2

0.03

1459

0.035

1462/1

0.105

1462/2

0.03

1463

1466/2

0.195

1467

0,115 TOTAL

2.02

0,05

East- All-

Tummal- 173

0.235

Godavari avaram

200/1

apalli

0.075

200/2

(0.09

201/ 1A

0.235

204

0.15

325/3

0.105

325/4

0.03

325/5

326/1

0,075

0.035

326/2

0.03

341/1

0.08

341/2

0,02

341/3

0.135

341/4

342/5

0.03

342/6

0,125

0.03

344

0.02

346 2081 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

6 3

East

348/1

Alla-

0.015 All-

East

Tummar-

0.17

Gundupudi 610

611

0.16 Godavari avaram

348/2

0.01

Godavari varam

apalli

0.215 361/1

683/2

0.11

(Contd.)

0.16 361/2

684/1

0.12

685

362/3

0.03

0.115

0.035

689/1

364/1

0.015

0.08

364/2

689/2

0.18

0.265 364/3

0.095

690/2

0.02 364/4

0.015

691/1

376

0.04

0.07

691/2

0.05

377

692/1

0.115

0.01 382/2

0.025

692/3

381/3

0.01

698/1

0.125

698/2

382/1

0.035

0.06 382/2

0.04

699/2

0,075

0.035

382/3

700/4

0.115 382/4

0,045

701/1

0.245 383

0.22

702

0.4 385/4

0.03

TOTAL

2.185 386

0.03

East All-

0.355

Samantha- 45/1

0.1

387/1

Godavari avaram kurru

45/4A

0.4 387/2

0.07

45/5

0.015

0.085

388

0.075

66/1

0.295

380

0,045

66/2

0,295

1214

0.045

66/3

0.13

1215/2

67/1

0.01 1215/3

0.18

0.125

67/2

0.095

1215/4

0.115

0.035

1215/5

0.09

1241/1

TOTAL

1.185 1242/2

0.115

503

0.045

East Alla- Deva-

0.115

1242/3

Godavari varam

505

0.03

guptam

1247/5

0.075

506/1

0.175 1247/8

0.07

0,035

508/2

1250

0.37

0.07

508/3 A

1271/1

0.06

0.075

508/3B

1271/2

0.18

0.045

508/3C

1271/3

0.16

0,065

507

0.08

1274/1

0.065

509

1274/2A

0.03

0.085

518

1274/2B

0.115

519/2

0.03 1275/4

0.115

0.055

524/1

1275/5

0.115

0.2

525/3

1275/8

0.125

527/1

0.185 1275/11

0.035

540

0.37

0.035

1275/12

541/1

0.035

5.855

TOTAL

0.12

541/4

East Alla-

0.115

541/5

0.025 Gundupudi 593

605

0.375

Godavari varam

0.025

541/6

606

0.05

0,005

544

0.05

608/2

545

0.025 608/3

0.085

546/1

0.095 609/1

0.005

546/2

0.225 609/2

0.045 2082

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

5 East Alla- Deva- 564

0.05

0.17

East Uppala- Challapalli 376/5

Godavari varam

565/3

0.005

376/6

0.035 guptam

Godavari guptam

565/4B

0.05

376/7

0.005

0.02

565/4C

376/9

0.14 565/4D

0.055

377

0.8 565/6A

395/1

0.04

0.095

565/ 6B

395/3

0.02

0.01

0.02

395/2

0.085

566/1

0,045 566/2

395/4

0.01

0.015

395/5

567/1

0.055

0.01

395/6

568/1A

0.055

0.045

395/7

568/ 1B

0.045

395/8

0.13

0.055

568/ 1C

395/9

0.1 568/2

0.055

0.01

398/2

568/4

0.005

(0.145

401/1

569/1

0.005

0.045

401/2B

0.065

569/2

0.025

401/4

0.55

569/3

0.005

402/1

569/4

0.06

0.065

402/2

570/1

0.09

0.05

403

0.145

570/2

0.01

405/14

3.455

TOTAL

0.105

405/15

0.245

0.385 East Uppala Challapalli 48

406

0.28

0.05

411

Godavari guptam

0.135

0.155

408

0.07

413

0.085 53

0.35

0.055

415/2

354/1

0.015

0.06

415/3

0.01

354/2

0.17

416/1

0.085

354/4

416/2

0.095

0,065

354/5

0.055

416/3

354/6

0.04

0.16

416/6

354/12

0.075

0.015

416/7

354/14

0.02

0.155

504

354/15

0.05

0.065

517/10

354/16

0.005

0.04

517/11

354/21

0.01

0.07

517/12

0.085

355/1

517/13

0.115 355/6

0.08

0.095

518/1

0.065

355/7

0.055

518/4

0.055 356/2

0.015

518/5

0.03

358

518/6

0.03 359/2

0.1

518/8

0.01 359/3

0.125

518/10

0.06

0.135

0.22 366/4

518/11

366/5

0.34

0.005

518/12

0.05

0.07 370/5

519/ 1A

0.065

0.035 370/6A

519/ 1B

0.075

0.285 370/6B

519/3

0.055

370/8

520

0.115

0.07

0.055

521

370/10

0.06

522

0.135

371

0.045

376/1

7.665

TOTAL 2083 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन14,1926

पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

0.035

East-

S. Yanam 119

Uppala

0.005

120/7A

Godavari guptam

0.085

120/8

0.01

130/2A

0.13

130/2B

130/3

0.04

130/4

131/1

0.105

132/2

0.005

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निर्देश देती है कि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को , केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, पाइपलाइनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार , इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

0.045

132/3

132/4

0.06

अनुसूची

0.03

132/5

गाँव

तहसील

जिला

सर्वे नं.

133

0.16

136/2

0.03

136/4

136/6

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करनेके लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में)

0.01

0.155

136/7

137

0,16

भरुच

सीमलीया

0-53-00

0.36

158

वागरा

सारन

316

0.01

0-11-40 164

0-21-00

वहीयाल 516

1.505

TOTAL

474

[F. No. O- 12016/37/2005 -O.N.G.D. -IV]

समनी

386

0-59-40

आमोद

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy .

01-45-80

योग

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2005

[फा. सं. एल-14014/7/03-जी.पी. ]

एस.बी. मण्डल , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2005 का.आ. 767.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्याका.आ. 1007 , तारीख 08-04-2004 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में दहेज- वेमार - विजयपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 15-6-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;

S.O. 767. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1007 , dated 08-04-2004 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transport of Natural Gas through Dahej -Vemar- Vijaipur pipeline project in the State of Gujarat by the GAIL (India) Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 15/06/2004;

और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया है;

Andwhereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the competent authority :

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted its report to the Central Government :

औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित हैं, उस में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

And whereas the Central Government has , after considering the said report , decided to acquire the Right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule :

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में

565 GI/05-12 2084

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

अनुसूची

land specified in the schedule is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline:

राज्य: हरियाणा

होडल

तहसील:

जिला फरीदाबाद

क्र. ग्राम का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल है . में

सं.

78/2

0.1240

1. पैगंलतु

0.0150 And, further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government liereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on this date of the publication of this declaration , in the GAIL ( India) Limited. free from all encumbrances .

0.0090 SCHEDULE

65/1

0.0150

0.1470

Distt.

Tehsil

()

Village

0.1470 Survey No.

0.1450

Area to be Acquired for R.O.U. ( in Hectares)

0,1360

63/2

0.0510 1

0,1050

0.1540

0-53-00

Bharuch Bharuch Simaliya 91

316

Saran

0.1520

0-11-40

Vagra

516

0-21-00

0.1020 Vahiyal

0,0630 474

0,1020 Amod

386

Samni

0-59-40

0.0180

46/3

0.1400 Total 01-45-80

0.1210

0.1580

0,0020 [ F. No. -L 14014/7/03 -G.P. ] S.B. MANDAL , Under Secy .

0.0010

0.1530 नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2005

0.1560

0,1300

43/3

0.1240

0.1470

0.1320

0.0960

का.आ. 768.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाईपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0.1460

25/3

0,1370

0.1360

0.1390

0.1220 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाईपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

0,1000

0.0240

0.1260

0.0960

0.0530

0.1030 अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उम भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

0,0380

0.0100

22/23

0.1250

63/2

गोछी नाला 0,1840

कोई व्यक्तिजो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजण्त्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री लाल सिंह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- मांगल्या पाईपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना, भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, प्लाट नं. - 590 , सेक्टर 21 ए, फरीदाबाद-121001 ( हरियाणा ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 2085 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

0.0310

0.0100 1 . पैगंलतु (जारी)

2.कावँरका (जारी)

136 (रास्ता)

0.0120

0.1060 378 (रास्ता)

0.03 10

0.0420 379 (रास्ता)

35/3

2. कावँरका

0.1470

0,1490 8

0.0730

1/24

0.0150

0.0730

57 (पिगोंर नाला) 0.0990

0.0020

0.0430

58 (रास्ता)

30/1

0.0020

0,0560

65 (रास्ता)

0.1480

0.0350

70(रास्ता)

0.1410

3. पिंगौर

.35/9

0.1100 12

0.1510

0.1380 18

0.1020

0.0990

20/3

0.0520

(0.0440 23

0.1390

19/18

0.1290 25/1

0.0220

0.1490

0.1470

4. खिरबी

10/15

0.0590 11

(0.1490

0.1540

(0.1260

0,0870 21

0.0850

9/21

(0.0570 22

0.0580

18/1

0.0530 24/5

(0.1190

(0.14 10 6

0.0220

0.1460 21/4

0.1440

0.1520 6

0.0170

(0.1220 7

0.1310

0.0230 14

0.0070

(0.0680

78 (होडल राजवाह) 15

0.1440

0.1370

188 (रास्ता)

0.1460

0.0050

20/1

0.1230

0.1380 13/3

0.1490

0.1450 8

(0.1480

0,1430 13

0.1500

0.1430

0.0010

(0,1430 17

0.1220

0.0030 18

0.0330

33/2

0.0680 24

0.0730

(0.1500

0.0510

(0.1440 2

0.0250

0.0920 9

0.0730

0.1410 10

0.0400

0.1490

0.0910

35/3

(0.1170

0.1560

0.0260 19

0.0600

0.1390 23

0.0890

0,0070 5/10

0.0590

0,1420

0.1360

0.0650 20

5. बॉसवा

0,1570

14/14

00020 21

0,2250

0,1350 4/5

(0.1450

0.1410 6

0.1420

34/4

00660 15

0.1830

( 0.0740 3/4

0.1640

0,0380 7

0.1510

0.1410 14

0.1530

(),147 ) 2086

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

1 2

0.1440

5. बॉसवा ( जारी)

36/5

0.1070

0.0060

37/1

0.0400

0.1460

0.1450

0,1420

0.1170

56/1

0.1470

0.1070

0.0640

0.0810

0.1410

0.1390

56/22

0.1440

61/2

0.1450

0.0070

0.1600

6. घसैड़ा

0.0290

0.1080

0.1520

0.1390

82/3

0.1440

0.1240

0.1680

0,1100

0.1360

87/3

0.1270

0.1450

0.1310

0.1360

0.1340

107/3

0.1450

0.1130

0.1550

0,0020

0,1400

0.0860

0,0580

110/3

0.0010

0,1130

0,0700

0.1450

0.1440

0.1370

0.1350

128/4

0.0040

0.1020

(0.0470

0.1250

0.1430

0.1350

129/5

0,1400

0,0870

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

4 15

0.1280 16

0.0170 130/11

0,0200 130/20

0.1320 21

0.1080 170 ( उजीना नाला) (0.2780

0.0130 128 (रास्ता)

178 (होड़ल राजवाह) 1.1360 179 ( नंदगाव राजवाह) (0.1430

0,4300 194 (रास्ता)

0,0620 206 (रास्ता)

0,0370 207 ( रास्ता)

0.0310 234 (रास्ता)

0,0120 518 ( रास्ता)

0.0310 519 ( रास्ता)

0.0120 539 ( रास्ता)

0.0120 563 (रास्ता)

7/13

0.0010 14

0.1170 17

0,1360 24

0.0120 17/4

0.0800

0,0690 5

0.1530 15

0,1500 16

0,0970 25

0.0110

0.0040 16/20

0.1210 21/1

(0.1-480 10

0,1510

0,0820 11

0.0700 19

(0.1540 22

0,1470 33/2

0.1430 3

0.0070 8

0,1350

0.0160 13

0.1500 18

0,1540 23

0.0850

0.0680 24

0,1520 36/4

0.1520 14

0,1420 36/15

0.0130 16

0.1370 17

0.0090 25

0.0950

0,680 91 ( रास्ता)

00120 92(रास्ता)

0.0250 101 ( रास्ता)

0.0020 306 ( रास्ता) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2087

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

1 2

75/3

0.1220

7. भिडूकी

7. भिडूकी (जारी)

0.1430

0.1400

0.1350

100/3

0.1340

0.0100

0,1220

0.0210

0.1430

8. खाम्बी

0.1420

0.1430

103/4

(0.1450

0.0510

0.0900

0.1470

0.0010

0.1430

0.1370

129/5

0.1400

0.1410

0.0260

128/10

0.0070

0.1130

0.1420

0.1390

0.1470

133/1

0.1400

0.0700

0.0450

0.1420

0.0780

0.1150

0.1420

158/2

0.1500

158/12

0.1430

0.0090

0.1240

0.0240

0,1480

162/3

0.1410

0.1350

0.1160

0.0020

0.0610

0.0830

0.0010

0.1440

187/4

0.1470

0.1430

0.0230

0.1170

0.0090

0.1360 189/5

0.1930

0,0860 6

0.0760

0.0620 % (रास्ता)

162/13

14 (खिरबी नाला) (0.0460 17

0.0310 335 (रास्ता)

1/5

0.0030 6

0,0020 2/1

0,0490

0.1380 10

0.1400

0,1400 20

0.1380 5/1

0.1400

0.1400 10

0.1410 11

0.1440 21

0.1340 9/1

0.1380

0.1360 10

0.1170

0.0300 9/12

0.1000 19

0,0430 20

0,0010 22

0.1390

0.1360 17/2

0.1380

0,1410 12

(0.1410 19

0.1380 22

27/2

(0.1420 9

0.1400 12

0.1370 19

0.1330

0.1330 22

39/2

0,1440 8

0.0010

0.1370 9

0.0990 12

0.0420

0,1010 18

0,0290 23

0.1400 51/3

0.1480 8

0.1400 13

0.1400 18

0.1470 23

0,1380 64/3

0.1410 2088

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

0.1330 8. खाम्बी (जारी)

0.1390

0.1440

0.1390

0.1110

77/3

0.0290

0.0980

0,0410

0,0010

0,1430

0.1380

77/24

0.1310

0.1430

90/4

0.1390

90/14

0.1420

0.1380

107/4

0,1400

0.1450

0.1070

0.0350

0.1030

0,0320

0.1320

120/5

0.1340

0.1310

0.1450

0,1450

0.1360

136/5

0.1560

(0.1250

0.1360

0.1400

0.1530

0.0760

148/5

0.0140

0,0020

0.0630

147/1

0.1270

0,1390

0.1360

0.1380

166/1

0,1440

0.1490

0.1350

0.1310

0.1400

0.1310

175/1

0,1410

0.1410

0.1330

0.0310

0.1020

194/1

0.0370

PART II -SEC 3 ( ii )]

り

0,0910 8. खाम्बी (जारी)

00510

0.0050

194/11

0.1350

0.1410

0,1310

202/2

(0.14000

0.1350

0.1430

0.1390

0,1360

218/2

0,1660

0.1420

0.1400

0,1390

0,1300

0.1100

225/2

0.0290

0.0320

0.0260

0,0120

279 (राम्ता)

0.1680

280 ( रास्ता)

0.0120

281 ( रास्ता)

0.0680

284 (राम्तां)

0.0430

288 ( राम्ता)

292

293 (पिगार नाला) (0.2280

0.0250

299 (रास्ता)

0,0120

382 (रास्ता)

0.0120

38.3 ( राम्ता)

0,0120

391 ( रास्ता)

0,0120

445 ( रास्ता)

0.0120

448 ( राम्ता)

0,0120

449 (रास्ता)

0.0120

466 (रास्ता)

0,0120

469 ( राम्ता)

15/5

(0.1440 9. भूपगढ़ उर्फ टिकरी

(

0.0020

00370

13/25

0,0210

48 (रास्ता)

|फा. सं. आर-31015/91/2004- आं. आर.- II ।

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th February , 2005

S.O. 768. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthe transportation of petroleum products from Manglya ( Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh , an extension pipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan NCT of Delhi should be laid by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited:

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of lay ing such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereio:

2089

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0.0240

1 . Paingaltu (Contd.)

0.1260

0.0960 Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

0.0530

0.1030

0.0380

0.0100

22/23

0.1250

63/2

10 Gonchi 0.1840 Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Lal Singh, Competent Authority, Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , Plot No. 590 , Sector 21A , Faridabad- 121 001 (Haryana) .

11 Drain)

SCHEDULE

0.0310 Tehsil: Hodal District: Faridabad

136 (Rasta)

State:Haryana

0.0120

378 ( Rasta) Survey No. Area in Hect .

Sl. Name ofVillage

0.03 10

379 (Rasta) No.

2. Kanwarka

35/3

0.1470

1 2

0.0730

0.1240

0.0730 78/2

1. Paingaltu

0.0150

0,0020 9

0,0090

0.0020

30/1

0.0150

65/1

0.1480 2

0.1410

0.1470

0.1510

0.1450

0.1020 19

0.1450

0.0520 22

0.1360

0.1390

0.0510

63/2

25/1

0.0220 3

0.1050

0.1470 9

0.1540

0.1520

0.1260

0.0850

0.1020

0.0630

0.0580 21

0.1020

24/5

0.1190

0.0180

(0.0220 46/3

0.1400

21/4

0.1440 8

0.1210

0.0170 13

0.1580

0.1310 14

0.0020

0.0070 17

0.0010

0.1440 18

0.1530

0.1460 23

0.1560

0.1230

0.1300

43/3

13/3

0.1490 8

0.1240

0.1480 13

0.1470

0.1500 18

0.1320

0.0010 23

0.0960

- 0.1220 25/3

0.1460

0.0330 8

0.1370

0.1500 13

0.1360

0.0510 18

0.1390

0.0250 23

0.1220

0.0730

0.1000

0.0400 2090

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 2

4 12

0.0910

2. Kanwarka ( Contd .)

(0,1490

4. Khirbi (Contd.)

0.1560

35/3

0.1170 22

0.0600

0.0260 23

0.0890

0.1390 5/10

0,0590

0,0070 11

0.1360

0.1420 20

0.1570

0,0650 21

0.2250

0,0020

14/14

5. Banswa

4/5

0,1450

0.1350 6

0.1420

0.1410 15

0.0660

0.1830

34/4

0.1640

0.0740 3/4

0.0380 7

0.1510

0.1530

0.1410 15

0.1470

0.0100

0.1060

0,1440 17

36/5

0,1070

0.0420

0.1490

0.0060 1/24

37/1

0,0400

0.0150

0,1460

) (0,099 )

57 ( Pingor Drain

0.0430

0,1450 58 (Road)

0.0560

0.1420

65 (Road)

0.1170

0.0350

70 (Road)

0.1470 35/9

56/1

0.1100

3. Pingorc

(0.1070 12

0.1380

0,0640

0.0990

0.0810 20/3

0.0440

0,1410 19/18

0.1290

0.1390

0.1490

0,1440

56/22

10/15

4. Khirbi

0.0590

0.1450

61/2

0.149)

0.0070 25

0,0870

9/21

0.1600

0,0570

0.0290

0.0530

18/1

0.1410

0.1080 10

0,1520

0.1460

0.1520

0.1390

0.1440 21

82/3

0.1220

0,1240

0.0230

0,1680

0.0680

78 (Hodal

0,1100 Distributary)

0.1370

188 (Road)

0.1360 20/1

0,0050

87/3

0.1270

0.1380

0.1450 9

0.1450

0.1310 12

0.1430

0.1360

0.1430

0.1340

0.1430

107/3

0.1450 23

0.0030

0.1130

33/2

00680

0.1550

0.0730

0,0020 8

0,1440

0,1400 13

0,0920

0,0860

0.1410

0,0580 2091 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

4 1

0.0160

6. Ghasera (Contd.)

110/3

0,0010

5. Banswa ( Contd .)

0.1500 4

0.1130

0.1540 7

0.0700

0.0850

0.1450

0.0680 17

0.1440

36/4

0.1520 24

0.1370

(0.1520 128/4

0.1350

0.1420 5

0.0040

36/15

0.0130 6

0.1020

0.1370 7

0.0470

0.0090 15

0.1250

0.0950 16

0.1430

0,0680

91 (Rasta) 25

0.1350

0.0120

92 (Rasta) 129/5

0.1400

0.0250

101 (Rasta) 6

0.0870

0.0020

306 (Rasta) 15

0.1280

75/3

7. Bhiruki

(0.1220 16

0.0170

0.1430 130/11

0.0200

0.1430 130/20

0.1320

0.1400 21

0.1080

0.1350 170 (Ujina Drain) 0.2780

100/3

0.1340

0.0130

128 (Rasta)

0.0100

1.1360

178 (Hodal

0.1220 Distributary)

0.0210 179 (Nandgaon 0.1430

0.1430 Distr.)

0,1420

0.4300

194 (Rasta)

0.1430

0.0620

206 (Rasta)

103/4

0.1450

0.0370

207 (Rasta)

0.0510

0.0310

234 (Rasta)

0.0900

0.0120

518 (Rasta)

0.1470

0,0310

519 (Rasta)

0.0010

0.0120

539 (Rasta)

0.1430

0.0120

563 (Rasta)

0.1370 7/13

0.0010

6. Ghasera

129/5

0.1400 14

0,1170

0.1410 17

0.1360

0.0260 24

0.0120

0.0070

128/10

17/4

0.0800

0.1130 5

0.0690

0.1420

0.1530

0.1500

0,1390 16

0,0970

133/1

0.1470 25

0.0110

0.1400 16/20

0.0040

0.0700

0.1210

0.0450 21/1

0.1480

0,1420 10

0.1510

0,0780

0.0820

0.1150

0,0700

158/2

(0.1420 19

0.1540

0,1500 22

0.1470

158/12

0.1430 33/2

0.1430

0,0090 3

0.0070

0.1240 8

0.1350

565 G1/05-13 2092

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 / PHALGUNA 14. 1926

PART II-SEC 3 ( ii )| 1

4 19

7. Bhiruki ( Contd. )

0.0240

8. Khambi (Contd.)

0.1330 23

0.1480

0,1330 162/3

0.1410

39/2

0.1440

0.1350

0,0010 13

0,1160

0,1370 14

0,0020

0,0990 17

0,0610

0,0420 18

0.0830

0.1010 23

0.0010

0.0290 24

0,1400

0,1440

187/4

(0.1470

0,1480

51/3

0.1430

0,1400 14

0.1430

(0,1400 16

0.0230

0.1470 17

0.1170

0.1380 24

0,0090

64/3

0.1410 25

0,1360

0.1330 189/5

0.1930

0.1390 6

0.0860

0.1440 15

0.0760

0.1390

0.0620

77/3

0.1110 % (Rasta)

162/13

0.0290

0.0980 14 ( Khirbi Drain) (0.0460

0.0410 18

0.0010

0.0310

335 (Rasta)

0.1430 8. Khambi

1/5

0.0030

0.1380 6

0.0020

77/24

0.1310 2/1

90/4

0.1430

0,0490

0.1380

0.1390

0.1400

90/14

0,1420 20

0.1400

0.1380 21

0.1380

0.1380 5/1

0.1400

107/4

0.1400

0,1450

0.1410

0.1070 20

0.1440

0,0350 21

0.1340

0.10.30

9/1

0.1380

0,0320 10

0.1320

0,1360

120/5

0.1340

0.1170

9/12

0,0300

0,1310 19

0,1000

0.1450 20

0.0430

0.1450

0,1360

0.0010

0.1560

136/5

0.1390

17/2

0.1360

0.1250 9

0,1380

0.1360 12

0.1410

0.1400

0.1530 19

0.1410

0.0760

148/5

0.1380

27/2

0,1420

0.0140

0.1400

0.0020 9

0.0630

0.1370

147/1 2093 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

0.1270

0.0370 10

8. Khambi (Contd.)

13/25

0.0210

0.1390

48 (Rasta)

9. Bhupgarh alias Tikri (Contd.)

0.1360

0.1380

[F. No. R- 31015/ 91/2004 -O.R-II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy. 166/1

0,1440

0.1490

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2005

0.1350

0.1310

0.1400

175/1

0.1310

0.1410

का.आ. 769.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाईपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0.1330

0.0310

194/1

0.1020

0,0370

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाईपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

0.0910

0.0510

194/11

0.0050

0.1350

0.1410

0.1310

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

202/2

0,1400

0.1350

0.1430

0.1390

0.1360

218/2

0.1360

0.1420

0.1400

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री वी.पी. पाठक, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुम्बई-मांगल्या पाईपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना, भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, एम.बी. - 7, महाश्वेता नगर, महेन्द्र भटनागर मार्ग , उज्जैन -456010 ( मध्य प्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 19

0.1390

0.1300

अनुसूची

0.1100

225/2

राज्य: मध्य प्रदेश

जिला: शाजापुर

तहसील: सुसनेर

0.0290

क्र. ग्राम का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल 8

0.0320

0.0260

सं.

हैक्टेयर में 9

0.0120

279 (Rasta)

1 2

0.1680

280 (Rasta)

0.5240

84 ( शास. भूमि)

1. नाहरखेड़ा

0.0120

281 (Rasta)

0.0259

85( नदी)

0.0680

284 ((Rasta)

0.1320

86 ( शास . भूमि)

0.0430

288 (Road)

0.1521

87 (शास. भूमि)

0.2280

292(Pingar

0.0305

83( नदी)

293 Drain

0.2365

0.0250

299 (Rasta)

0.1962

0.0120

382 (Rasta)

0.0512

77 (नदी)

0.0120

383 (Rasta)

0.0306

0.0120

391 (Rasta)

0.1458

0.0120

445 (Rasta)

0.0557

0.0120

448 (Rasta)

0.0127

0.0120

449 (Rasta)

0.2237

0.0120

466 (Rasta)

0.3160

0,0120

469 (Rasta)

0.1656 15/5

0.1440

125

0.0718 6

9. Bhupgarh aliasTikri

0.0020 2094

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1 2

0.1977

0.0456 127 ( शास भूमि)

451

1. नाहरखेड़ा

3. पिपलिया नानकर ( जारी.. )

0.0847

450

0.0410 37 (शास. भूमि)

0.04673

0.1058

447

34(शास. भूमि)

2. उमरिया

0.8671

0.0334 667 (शास. भूमि)

483 (शास. नाला)

626

0.0327

0.0881 132 (शास . नाला)

0.0327

625

0.0682 120 ( शास. भूमि)

0.0028

624

0.0106 130 (शास. भूमि)

0.0274

0.0435 134 ( शास. नाला)

624/1411 ( शास. भूमि)

0.0141

289

0.0090 139 ( शास. भूमि)

0.0547

275

0.0010 140 (शास. भूमि)

4. बामनिया खेड़ी

276

0.2003

0.1097 151 (शास. भूमि)

0.0358

277

0.0005

152 (शास. भूमि)

0.0140

293

0.0010 150 (शास. भूमि)

0.0084

0.2427

292

149 ( शास. भूमि)

0.0403

0.0212

301

181 ( शास. नाला)

0.0295

0.2865

302

180 (शास. भूमि)

0.0111

0.0168

304

161 (शास. भूमि)

305

0.3590

0.0425 164(शास. भूमि)

353

0.0108

0,1704 165 ( शास . भूमि)

363

0.0100

0.1039 173 (शास. भूमि)

0.5287

366

0.0180 177 ( शास. भूमि)

365

0.0055

0,0998 166 (शास. भूमि)

0.0224

0.0419

367

3. पिपलिया नानकर 90 (शास. भूमि)

0.2270

371

0.0816 179 (शास. भूमि)

372

0,0842

0.6403

180 ( शास. भूमि)

0.0190

0.1152

379 (शास . रास्ता)

155 (शास . रास्ता)

0.2035

413

0.1028 159

0.0426

412

0.0010 157

0.0757

411

156

(0.0200

414

0.0079

0.0133

172 (शास. नाला)

0.0213

0.0640

139

417 (शास. नाला)

415

0.0219 141

0.0114

416

0,0381 140

0.2429

470

0.0493 145

0.0342

0.0140

468/1255

0.0816

152

469

0.0109 146

0.0572

468

0.0158 148

0.0878

0.0884

0.1862

149 ( शास. रास्ता)

467

471

0.0142

0.0181 346 ( शास. रास्ता)

0.0124

0.1965

335 ( शास. रास्ता )

466

0.0823 345

472

0.0061

340

465

0,8000

0.1221

473

0,0031 339

0.1215

474

338

0.1189

0,0768

475

0.0203

0.0103

337

476

0.0737

0.0387

426 ( शास. रास्ता)

477

0.0716

0.0664

428

482

0.2028

0.1170

429

480

0.0808

430

0,1177 461

481

0.0152

0.0085

458

364

0.0200

0.0811

485

0.3000 459

0.0249

483

0.0697

456

0.0100 452

393

0.0032

0.0287

5. मैना 2095 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

4 2

390

0.2132

1840

0.0220 5 मैना (जारी..)

5 मैना (जारी.. )

392

0.0034

0.0264

1842

389

0.0258

1843

0.0224

0,0313

1844

0.0140 1048 ( शास . रास्ता)

404

0.0949

1860

0.0193 412

0.1854

1859

0.1034 411

0.1310

1861

0.0124 410

0.1122

1858

0.0150 429

0.0269

1972

0.0102 430

0.1582

0.1483

1899

431

0.0789

0.0985

2001

1032

0.0010

2002

0.0159

0.0398

2003

0.2050 1037 ( शास. रास्ता)

1023

0.1812

0.0284

2005

1024

0.0466

0.1322

2004

1025

0.1154

0.0843

2026

1026

0.0580

0.0625

2017

1012

0.0874

0.0389

2016

980

0.0456

2015

0.1131

0.0876

982

2014

0.1362

0.0292

983

2018

0.1327 984

0.0745

0.0482

2010 (शास. भूमि)

993

0,0307

2012

0.0400

0.0767

994

1155

0.0300

0.0529

992

989

0.0200 991

0.0424

1013

0.0100

0.0526

1163

432

0.0100

0.0615

1159

391

0.0400

0.0618

1164

981

0.0200

0.0633

1957

0.0491

6 बोरखेड़ी

731 ( शास . नाला)

0.0431

1156

481

0.5212

0.0085

1154

477

0.0375

0.0353

482

0.0554 1640 ( शास. नाला)

1646

0.2185

475

0.0200 1647

0.0010

0.0541

476

1644

0.0196

0.0498

478 (शास. नाला )

1757

0.0303

0.4114 1756

0.0837

0.0147

109 ( शास . नाला)

0.0202

1755

0.3122 1745

0.0143

0,0356 1746

0,0653

0.0249

0.1070

1747

0.0407 1749

0.0131

0,0920

0.0339

1741

0.1495

0.0162

1778

0.0071 1812

0.0320

0.0292

0.0063

1813

0.0818

0.0961

1818

0.0467

1819

0.0039

0.1575 1817

0.0197

0.0538

1820

0.0750

0.0168 1839

0.0012

0.0709 1837

0.0412

(0,1253

0,0656

1838

0.0302 2096

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

1 2

0.0192

243

0.1235

9. मालन वासा-(जारी )

6. बोरखेड़ी-( जारी )

345

0.1228

0.0219 13

0.1930

242

0.1168 27

0.0070

347

0.0412

0.0986

233

0.0865 12

0.0233 11

232

0.1022

0.0184

234

0.0212 25

0.1603

0.0100

227

0.0823 84

0.0400

222

0.0777

0.0100

221

85 ( शास . नाला )

877

0.0002

0.0147

220

7 गुराड़ी

878

0,1538

0.2816

217

0.0566

879

0.0897

214

0,0917

0.0101

213

401( शास . नाला)

0.0300 873

212

0.0151

876

0,2031

829

0.1041

10 ननोरा

0.0002

0.0602 875

830

874

0.0586

0.0001

831

0.0641

833

399

0.0001

0.0032

0.0040

834

8 शत्रुखेड़ी

0.0165

0.1593

818

0.0792

0,1784

817

0.0494 54

0.1245

842

0.0847

843

0,0524 53

0.0557

0.0195

166 ( शास. नाला)

0.2173

0,0160

169

0.3374

170

0.1697

0.0530

0.1057

144

48 ( शास. नाला)

0.7861

145

0.1269

0.1328

0.0232

147

26 ( शास. रास्ता)

0.0641

0.0849

148

0.1743

0.1240

149

0.0016

150

0,0537 10

0.4829

152

0.0397

153

0,1010

0.0315

99(शास . सड़क)

231

0.3129

0.0262

154 ( शास . नाला )

0.0010

0.0016

749

745

0,0600

0,0100

737

748

9 मालनवासा

0,0100

0.1599

736

0.1657

837

0.0100

0.0497

0.0100

841

358 ( शास. नाला)

0.0362

0.0748

293

11 कादमी

274 ( शास . रास्ता )

294

0.0418

278

0,0946

0.0010

303

279

0.0032 302

0.0977

277

0.1021 323

0.0808

268

0.1318

0.0474 324

0.0822

267

300

266

0.0113

0.0361 336

0.0185

0.1447

261

337

0.0805

0.0620

262

339

0.0786

248

0.2183

0.0271

242

0.1511 251

250

0.1035

235

0,1092 344

0.0026

241

0.0118 2097 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

236

869

0.0636

0.1530

11 कादमी ( जारी.. )

12. मेहतपुर (जारी.. )

237

876

0.1826

0.1240

0.0475

877

0.0010 104 ( शास. रास्ता)

867

112

0.0794

0.0074

866

114

0.1115

0.1225 116

0.0315

914

0.0063 119

0.0621

915

0.1058 120

0.1747

923

0.0830

924

0.0864

0.0238

117 ( शास. रास्ता)

925

0.0119

0.0640 64

926

0.0120

0.0245

927

0.0193

0.0445 61(शास . नाला)

0.0677

928

0.0627 67

0.1507

0.0173

930 ( शास. रास्ता )

0.0058

0.0496

942

0.0394

931

0.0156 65

0.0106

937

0.2500 58

0.0107

952

0.0091 57

0.0599

296

0.2491 56

0.0444

0.1321

296/1230

0.0516

297

0.1222

0.0217

288

0.0010

0.0565

287

0,2409 602(शास . रास्ता)

0.2318

538

299

0.0115 546

0.0924

285

0.4215 547

0.1370

0.0273

244 ( शास. नाला)

571

0.0672

243

0.0020 570

0.1201

273

0.3271 577

0.0739

272

0.1010 568

0.1374

246

0.0816

0.1662

567

247

0.1111 566

0.2380

253

0.0206 589

0.0873

252

0.1399 591

0.1439

251

0.0372 593

0.1868

265

0.3737 608

0.0023

0.1018

1( शास. नाला)

0.0477

13. सोयत कला

609 (शास. रास्ता)

1351/4

0.0100 617/827

0.0520

1351/1

0.1100 610

0.1572

1350

0.2000 274

0.0400

1349/1

0.0400 263

0.0200

1349/2

0.1600 238

0.0100

1348

0,2300 113

0.0400

1347

0.0800 115

0.0100

0.0200

1346 ( शास. भूमि)

0,0300

0.1028

14. बिजनाखेड़ी

122

0.0100

0.1380 40

0.0100

0.2138 897

0.1566

0.1448 12 मेहतपुर

893

0.0734

0.1285 894

0.0841

0.0945 895

0.1417

0.1123 885

0.2113

0.0256

880 ( शास. रास्ता)

0.0780 875

0.1200

0.0245 2098

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1 2

0.1194

14. बिजनाखेड़ी( जारी.. )

0.1133

0.1362

to Shri V.P. Pathak , Competent Authority , Mumbai- Manglya Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , MB -7 . Mahashweta Nagar , Mahendra Bhatnagar Marg , Ujjain - 456 010 ( Madhya Pradesh) .

SCHEDULE

0.0033

State: M.P.

0.1296

Tehsil : Susner

District : Shajapur

0,1613

SurveyNo.

15. निशानिया

481

1.7099

Area in Hectare

Sl . Name ofVillage No.

16. डोंगर गाँव

0.0219

446 ( शास. रास्ता)

1 2

445

0.1333

0.5240

0.0648

1. Naharkheda

444

84 ( Govt . Land)

0.0259

0.0579

443

85 ( River)

0.1320

0.0209

442

86 ( Govt. Land )

0.1521 441

0.2293

87 ( Govt . Land)

0.0305

0.0484

438

83 ( River)

0,2365

0.1365

437

0.1962

0.0461

0.0512

77 ( River)

0.1856

0.0306

0,2054

0.1458

0.0398

0.0557

0.1226

0.0127

440

0.0100

0.2237

0.0929

148

17. पिपलिया खेड़ी

0.3160

0.2198

146

0.1656

143

0.0514

0.0718

125

0.0865

144

(0.1977

0.1277

127( Govt . Land)

0.0847

37 ( Govt . Land )

0.0303

0,4673

34 (Govt . Land)

0.1322

0.8671

0.0557

667 ( Govt . Land)

2. Umariya

75(नदी)

0.0327

132 ( Govt . Nala)

0.0327

120 ( Govt . Land )

[फा. सं . आर-31015/71/2004- ओ.आर.- II] हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

0.0028

130 ( Govt . Land)

New Delhi , the 25th February , 2005

0.0274

134 ( Govt . Land )

0.0141

139 ( Govt.Nala)

0.0547

1400 ( Govt . Land)

0.2003

151 ( Govt. Land )

0.0005

152 ( Govt . Land )

0.0140

150 ( Govt. Land)

0,0084 S.O. 769. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Manglya ( Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh , an extension pipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

149 ( Govt . Land)

0.0403

181 ( Govt. Nala)

0,2865

180 ( Govt . Land)

0.0168

161 ( Govt . Land)

(0.3590

164 ( Govt . Land)

And whereas it appears to the Central Government thatfor the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

0.0108

165 ( Govt . Land )

0.0100

173 ( Govt . Land)

0.5287

177 ( Govt . Land)

0,0055

166 ( Govt . Land)

0.0419

90 ( Govt . Land)

3. Pipliya Nankar

(0.2270

179 ( Govt . Land)

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

0.6403

180 ( Govt. Land)

0,1152

155 ( Govt . Rasta)

159

0.2035

157

(0.0426

0.0757

156

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule , may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right ofuser therein for laying of the pipeline under the land 2099 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन14, 1926

414

0.0133

0.0079 172 ( Govt . Nala)

139

0.0640

0.0213

417 ( Govt. Nala )

3. Pipliya Nankar (Contd.)

4. Bamniya Khedi (Contd.)

141

0.0114

415

0.0219 140

0.2429

416

0.0381

470

145

0.0342

0.0493 152

0.0140

0.0816

468/1255

146

469

0.0109

0.0572

148

468

0.0878

0.0158

467

0.1862

0.0884 149 ( Govt. Rasta)

471

0.0142

0.0181 346 ( Govt. Rasta )

0.1965

466

0.0124 355 ( Govt . Rasta)

345

472

0.0061

0.0823 340

465

0,8000

0.1221

473

339

0.1215

0.0031 338

0.0768

474

0.1189 337

475

0.0203

0.0103

0.0387

476

0.0737 426 ( Govt. Rasta)

428

477

0.0716

0.0664

0.1170

429

482

0,2028

0.0808

430

480

0.1177 461

481

0.0085

0.0152 458

364

0,0200

0.0811

485

0.0249

459

0,3000 456

0.0697

483

0.0100

0.0287

0.0032 452

393

5. Maina

451

0.0456

390

0,2132

0.0410

450

392

0.0034 447

389

0.0258

0.1058

0,0313

0.0334

483 (Govt . Nala)

1048( Govt . Rasta)

626

0.0881

404

0.0949 625

412

0.0682

0.1854 624

0.0106

411

0.1310

410

0.0435

0,1122 624/1411 (Govt. Land)

0.0269 289

0.0090

429

0.1483 275

0.0010

430

4. Bamniya Khedi

276

0.1097

431

0.0789

0.0358

277

1032

0,0010

0.0010

293

0.0398

1037 ( Govt . Rasta)

292

1023

0.2427

0.1812 301

0.0212

0.1322

1024

0.0295

1025

302

(0.1154 304

0.0111

1026

0,0580 305

0.0425

1012

0.0874 353

0.1704

980

0.1131 363

0.1039

982

0,0876 366

0.0180

983

0.0292 365

984

0.0998

0.0745 367

0.0224

993

0.0307 371

0.0816

994

0.0767 372

0.0842

992

0.0529

0.0190

991

379 ( Govt . Rasta )

0.0424 413

0.1028

1163

0.0526 412

1159

0.0615

0.0010

0.0200

411

1164

0,0618 565 G1 /05-14 2100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3

1957

0.0633

0.0491 5. Maina ( Contd.)

6. Borkhedi

731 ( Govt . Nala)

1156

0.0431

481

0.5212 1154

0,0085

477

0,0375

0.0554

482

0.0353

1640 ( Govt. Nala )

1646

0.2185

475

0.0200 1647

476

0.0010

0,0541

0,0498

0.0196

1644

478 ( Govt . Nala)

1757

0.0303

0.4114 1756

0.0147

0.0837

109 ( Govt . Nala )

1755

0.03122

0.0202

0,0356 1745

0.0143

1746

0.0653

0.0249

1747

0.0407

0.1070

0,0920 1749

0.0131

1741

0.0339

0.1495

1778

0,0071

0.0162

1812

0.0320

0.0292

0.0063

0.0818 1813

1818

0.0467

0.0961

1819

0.0039

0,1575 1817

0.0197

0.0538 1820

0.0750

0.0168

0,0709 1839

0.0012

1837

0.0412

0.1253

1838

0.0656

0.0302

1840

0.0220

0.0192

0.0264

1842

0.1228 1843

0.1930

0.0224

0.0070 1844

0.0140

1860

0.0986

0.0193

1859

0,1022

0.1034

1861

0.0184

0.0124

1858

0.0100

0.0150

1972

0.0400

0.0102

0.0100 1899

0.1582

85 ( Govt. Nala )

2001

877

0,0985

0.0002

7. Guradi

0,2816 20002

0.0159

878

0.0566 2003

0.2050

879

0.0101 2005

0.0284

401 ( Govt . Nala )

2004

0.0466

873

0.0151

876

0.2031 2026

0.0843

0.0625

875

0.0002 2017

0.0001 2016

0,0389

874

2015

399

0.0456

0.0001

0.0040 2014

0.1362

8. Shatrukhedi

0.0165 2018

0,1327

0.1784

0,0482

2010 ( Govt . Land)

0,1245 2012

0.0400

1155

0.0300

0.0847

0.0195 989

0,0200

1013

0.0100

0,2173 432

0.0100

0.3374

0.0400

391

0.05.30

48 ( Govt. Nala )

981

0.0200

0.7861 2101 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

+ 2

147

8. Shatrukhedi

0.0232

0.1328

10. Nanora (Contd. )

26 ( Govt . Rasta )

148

0.0849

0,0641

149

(0.1743

0.1240

0,0016

150

0.0537

0.0397 10

(0.4829

152

0,0315

153

0.1010 99 ( Govt. Road)

0.0262

(0.3129

231

154 ( Govt . Nala )

749

0.0016

0.0010 51

745

0.0100

0,0600 737

748

0.1599

0.0100 9. Malanwasa

736

0.1657

837

0,0100

0.0497

841

0.0100 358 ( Govt . Nala)

293

0.0748

0.0362

11. Kadıni

274 ( Govt . Rasta )

294

0.0418

278

0.0946 303

0.0010

279

0.0032 302

0.0977

277

0.1021 323

0.0808

268

0.1318 324

0.0822

267

(0.00474 300

0.0113

266

0.0361

0.1447

261

0.0185 336

337

0.0805

262

0,0620 339

0.0786

248

0.2183 251

242

0.0271

0.1511 250

0.1035

235

0.1092 344

0.0026

0.0118

241

243

236

0.1235

0.15.30 345

0.0219

237

0.1826 242

0.1168

0,0475

104 ( Govt . Rasta)

347

112

0.0412

0.0794 233

0.0865

114

0.1115 232

0,0315

0.0233

116

234

0.0212

119

0.0621 227

0.1603

0,0830

120

222

0.0823

0.0238

117 ( Govt. Rasta )

221

0.0777

0.0119 220

0.0147

0,0120

217

0.1538

0.0193

61( Govt . Nala )

214

0.0897

0.0677 213

0.0917

0.1507 212

0.0300

0.0058 10. Nanora

829

0.1041

0.0394 830

0.0602

0.0106 831

0.0586

0.0107

0.0641

833

0,0599

834

0.0032

0,0444 818

0.1593

0.0516

817

0,0792

0.0217 842

0.0494

0,0565

602( Govt . Rasta)

843

0.0524

538

0,2318

0.0557

546

166 ( Govt . Nala)

0.0924 169

0.0160

547

0.1370 170

0.1697

571

0.0672 144

0.1057

570

0.1201 145

0.1269

577

0.0739 2102

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

1 2

568

0.1374

247

0.1111 11. Kadmi ( Contd. )

12. Mehatpur ( Contd. )

567

0.1662

253

0,0206 566

252

0.1399

0.2380

0.0372 589

251

0.0873

0.3737

265

0.1439

591

0.1018 593

0.1868

1(Govt . Nala)

0.0100 608

0,0023

1351/4 ( Govt . Land)

13. Soyat Kala

0.1100

1351/1

0.0477

609 ( Govt. Rasta)

0,2000

1350

617/827

0,0520

0.0400 610

1349/1

0.1572

0,1600

1349/2

274

0.0400

0.2300

1348

0.0200

263

0.0800

1347

0.0100

238

0.0200

1346

113

0.0400

0.1028

0.0100

14. Bijna Khedi

115

0.1380

0.0300

0,2138

122

0,0100

0.1448

0.0100

0,1285

0.1566

897

12 Mehatpur

0.0945

0.0734

893

0.1123

0.0841

894

0.0256

895

0.1417

0.0780

885

0.2113

0.0245

0.0256

880 ( Govt . Rasta )

0.1194

875

0.1200

0.1133

0.0636

869

0.1362

876

0.1240

0.0033

877

0.0010

0.1296

0.0074

0.1613

0.1225

1.7099

481

15 Nishaniya

0.0063

0.0219

446 ( Govt . Rasta )

16 Dongar Gaon

915

0.1058

0.1333

445

0.1747

923

0.0648 924

0.0864

0.0579

143

925

0.0640

0.0209

442

926

0.0245

0.2293

0.0445

927

438

0.0484

0.0627

928

437

0.1365

0.0173

930 ( Govt . Rasta )

0.0461

0.0496

942

0,1856

0.0156

931

0.2054

937

0,2500

0.0398 952

0.0091

0.1226 296

0.2491

0.0100

140

296/1230

0.1.21

0.0929

148

17 Pipliya Khedi

0222

297

0.2198

146

288

0.0010

0.0514

143

287

0,2409

0,0865

0.0115

299

(0.1277

0.4215

285

0.0303

0.0273

244( Govt . Nala)

(0,1322 243

0.0020

0.0557

75(River)

0.3271

273

272

0.1010

0.0816

246

[ F. No. R- 3105 /71 /2004 -O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR . Under Secy .

2103

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन14, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 1 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 770. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का . आ . 1651 तारीख 11 जून , 2003 व्दारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इण्डस्टीस लिमिटेड के गोवा में उत्तरी/ दक्षिणी अपतट में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश में संरचनाओं से आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य में पूर्वी गोदावरी और पश्चिमी गोदावरी जिलों के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवाहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड व्दारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 30 जून , 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी

और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में , जनता की और से प्राप्त आश्रपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी व्दारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) व्दारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) व्दारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफास्टक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 2104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

अनुसूचि

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

जिल्हा: इस्ट गोदावरि

मंडलः आलमूर

गांव का नाम

रााज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश आर ओ यू अर्जित करने के लिए श्रेत्रफल

सर्वे सं । / सब डिविजन सं

2 1

61/6

1 ) बडुगुनिवानिलंक

61/9

63/4

134

40/4

44/3

44/2

44/1

38/6

133

44/5

38/5

40/2

40/3

40/5

54/2

63/3

61/8

43/1

नदी दो गाँव के बीछ में 2) धौतमि गोदावरि रिवर

98/2

2) मडिकि

31/1

37/2

167/1

37/3

38/3

38/4

14/2

40/1

96/4

97/2

15/1

96/5

31/2

हेक्टार

एर

सिएर 3

5 00

57 00

20 (सी एल)

79 01

(जीएल)

(जी एल)

29 00

65 00

19 00

90 00

(सीएल)

72 01

(जीएल)

59 00

53 00

07 00

72 00

68 00

81 03

(सी एल )

18 00

42 00

54 00

81 00

23 00

64 00

15 00

42 00

32 00

33 (सीएल)

46 00

(जीएल)

00 2105

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

47/2

2) मडिांके निरंतर

47/3

47/5

47/4

39/7ए

171/4ए

39/6

95/4

171/1वी

167/5

39/7वी

98/1

97/1

172/2

171/13वी

171/11 वो

21/6

172/5

38/5

16/4

39/5

171/14

172/1

170/1

168/5

168/4

166/2

167/4

14/3

95/3

38/2

95/2

21/5

21/4

16/6

16/5

93/1

89/1

89/2

89/3

89/4

95/5

5 00

99 00

06 00

09 00

48 (मी एल)

72 (मो एन)

01 (मी एल)

79 (मी एल)

71 00

(मीएल)

03 (मी एल)

59 00

78 00

07 00

61 00

95 00

88 00

82 00

47 00

23 00

06 00

37 00

60 00

10 00

51 00

17 00

40 00

66 00 2106

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

रााज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिल्हा: इस्ट गोदावरि

मंडलः आतेयपुरम

20/9

1) आतयपुग्म

20/7ए

20/ 6ए

18/5मी

18/4मी

20/5

79/1

20/6वो

29/ 2ए

29/1

18/1वी

18/7मी

16/1

18/2ए

29/2वी

16/8

29/4वी

29/3वी

18/6सी

18/10

18/9

18/8सी

20/6सी

79/2

20/4

18/2वी

16/7वी

16/6

20/3

77/1

20/11

18/8 ए

77/2

79/3

20/12

20/10

68/3

2) वसंतवाड

72/18सी

72/19सी

72/20

64/3

71/16

47 00

90 00

37 00

55 (मी एल)

84 00

(गी एल)

03 00

(मीएल)

69 00

(मीएल)

56 00

(मी एल)

71 00

61 00

(मीएल)

22 00

31 00

43 00

10 00

33 00

68 00

57 00

28 00

83 00

(जी एल)

62 (जी एल)

91 00

10 00

46 00

61 00

20 00

76 00

61 00

62 00

51 00

43 00

60 00

51 00

(जी एल)

10 00 2107

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

71/1

2) वमंतवाड निरंतर

107/1

71/7ए

72/16

67/18

70/5

67/12

71/2ए

70/6

64/1

67/17

67/16

67/15

72/17मी

67/13

70/4

67/11

67/10

67/9

67/19

109/8

68/2

72/150

67/14

72/4ए

65/1

68/1

117/12

108

72/18ए

72/17ए

72/19ए

64/2

65/2

नदी दो गाँव के बीछ में 2) वसिस्ट गोदावरि रिवर

कुल

55/4

3)वुञ्चिलि

37/1

37/4ए

40/2

39/7

55/2

37/3

38/1

565 G1/05-15

5 00

05 00

21 (जी एल)

40 00

10 00

02 00

82 00

10 00

40 00

20 00

42 00

04 00

10 00

12 00

(सीएल)

96 (सीएल)

24 (सीएल)

54 (सी एल)

05 (सीएल)

68 00

84 (सीएल)

(सी एल)

93 (सी एल)

93 00

27 00

73 00

03 00

57 (सी एल)

45 00

95 00

44 (सी एल) 2108

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

37/ 2वी

3)चुच्चिनि निरंतर

25/6

40/1

25/7

61/3

55/31

39/5

55/3г

मंडलः कडियम

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

58 00

(मी एल)

60 00

03 00

53 00

38 00

98 00

00 00

43 (मो एल।

रााज्य आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिल्हा: ईस्ट गोदावरि

146

1) मुरमाडा

246/9

246/15

247/3

247/1

247/2

248/1

144/2

390/4

65/3

390/8

246/6

390/5

247/4

150/2

151/2

392/3

390/6

145/4

89/4

143/2

144/3

144/1

151/3

150/1

145/6

151/4

154/1

154/2

41/4

41/3

143/1

145/5

144/4

67 00

53 00

61 00

65 00

12 00

58 00

12 00

66 00

03 00

89 00

12 00

69 00

32 00

23 00

77 00

13 00

67 00

36 00

60 00

53 00

10 00

52 00

20 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2109

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

363/2

1) मुरुमांडा निरंतर

246/7

374

363/4

271/2

390/9

402/2

364

69/2

365

392/1

390/3

345/2

344/1

269/3

392/2

402/1

367

270/2

275

274/2

271/3

348/1

271/1

363/1

368

389/4

369/2

369/1

369/3

369/4

369/6

370/1

246/5

261/2

348/2

389/7

389/1

389/10

389/8

269/2

389/3

262

90/1

260

390/2

5 00

82 00

31 00

72 00

43 00

55 00

52 00

01 00

17 00

45 00

90 00

09.

18-

35 00

41 00

10 00

48 00

94 00

59 00

79 00

91 00

55 00

24 00

99 00

62 00

40 00

63 00

55 00

10 00

39 00

48 00

10 00

12 2110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

272/1

1 ) मुरुमांडा निरंतर

270/1

363/5

390/7

269/1

85/2

246/4

89/5

88/1

85/5

389/2

85/6

388/5

83/2

83/1

61/3

65/4

89/2

65/2

85/4

153

139

342

142

मंडलः मंडपेटा

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] 3

5 00

35 00

16 00

29 00

47 00

10 00

30 00

55 00

94 00

68 00

12 00

27 00

65 00

14 00

86 (सी एल)

49 (मी एल)

04 (सी एल)

26 (सीएल)

13 (मी एल)

77 (सी एल)

रााज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिल्हा: इस्ट गोदावरि

94/1

1) एडिदा

41/2

41/3

45/1

81/3

76/1

81/4

103/2

44/1

94/2

40/2

94/3

94/4

98/3

95/1

38/1

77 00

10 00

57 00

54 00

87 00

50 00

61 00

29 00

80 00

53 00

53 00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2111

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

2 एडिडा निरंतर

96/30

97/7

96/2

96/1

81/2

36/2ची

105

40/1

101

66 00

10 00

51 00

50 (मी एल)

75 (मी एल)

67 (गो एल)

03 00

(मी एल)

08 (मी एल)

14 (मी एल)

जिल्हा: वेस्ट गोदावरि

मंडलः पेरवलि

1)कानूर अगहाग्म

7/302

7/3बी

7/1

7/2

8/2सी

8/2डि

8/2बी

7/31

गॉव सीमा और 34 का वीच में

गॉव सीमा और 5 का वीच में

187/6

2)कानूरुजमिंदारि

187/8सी

187/3

187/4

187/ 8बी

196/4

187/7

186/9डि

187/5

173

353

196/3

197/3

197/6

169/15

207/8

रााज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश 00

48 (मा एल)

68 (मी एल)

(सी एल)

07 00

54 00

64 00

(सीएल)

30 00

55 (जी एल)

69 03

(जी एल)

69 00

00-

59 00

52 00

31 00

35 00

30 00

35 00

88 00

72 00

68 00

65 00

50 00

20 00

76 (सीएल)

00 2112

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14. 1926

354

2) कानूरजमिंदारि निरंतर

32/7

187/10

32/2

33/2

174/4

207/3

207/ 2वी

207/ 2 ए

169/5

174/3

169/3

169/2

169/1

171/3

170/1

175/7

207/7

169/4

204/1

169/6

207/9वी

207/1

196/1

196/5ए

196/5वी

204/3वी

207/9ए

204/2

169/14

206/3

206/2

206/1वी

206/4

188

207/6

204/3ए

187/9

33/5

360

33/6

30/2

32/1

33/7

33/4

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 3

35 00

00 (मी एल)

22 00

82 00

86 00

11 00

08 00

49 (मी एल)

03 00

77 00

28 00

69 00

80 00

83 00

15 00

01 00

78 00

30 00

89 00

50 00

52 00

32 00

54 00

91 00

(सी एल)

34 00

58 00

10 00

22 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2113

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

2 1

196/2

2)कानूरजमिंदारि निरंतर

355

14/1

3)नाडुपन्न

44/8

154/5

53/11

149/6

14/4

29/10 ए

29/9

29/10वी

53/1 ए

15/22

45/2

154/4

43/3ए

43/3वी

54/5

43/4

49/8

43/5

43/6

49/7

40/11

41/5

45/1

72/4

54/4

154/3

75/1

75/2

16/8ए

73/7

154/7

73/5

16/6

154/6

72/ 7वी

73/8

72/5

15/18वी

72/2

77/1

74/6

5 00

66 00

10 00

23 00

50 00

76 00

63 00

90 00

76 00

58 00

23 00

00 00

60 00

95 00

86 00

50 00

32 00

95 00

36 00

54 00

92 00

85 00

87 00

67 00

24 00

10 00

85 2114

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

17/6

3)नाडुपल्ल निग्नर

73/4

77/3

154/10ए

14/2

15/18ए

50/2वी

54/1मी

72/7

15/21

50/3

54/2

149/4

149/1

149/2

29/11

150/2

42/4

43/8

50/4

41/4

149/5

16/5

54/1 वी

54/1ए

150/1 एफ

41/2

72/3

149/3

154/8

42/5

150/6

150/7

150/1 ई

16/8वी

151

153/6

74/5

153/5वी

43/7

155/9

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 3

10 00

78 00

21 00

83 00

46 00

10 00

70 00

53 00

02 00

34 (मोएल)

61 00

13 (सी एल)

30 00

69 00

54 00

43 00

77 00

58 00

46 00

23 00

33 00

18 00

50 00

(मी एल)

66 00

86 00

01 (सी एल)

97 00

90 00

10 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2115

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

154/2

3)नाडुपल्ले निरंतर

41/6

43/9

41/3

16/7

72/1

5 00

74 00

05 00

86 00

48 (मी एल)

रााज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिल्हा: वेस्ट गोदावरि

मंडलः ताडेपल्लिगूडेम

510/6

1) आग्गालनु

504

733/2

575/2

690/2

630/9

687/4मी

522/6

683/2

694/1 ए

694/ 2ए

694/2वी

523/3बी

630/5

523/3एफ

522/3

522/4

629/3ए

629/3बी

802/2

635/7

681/4

681/3

681/2

681/1

636/4वी

636/4ए

733/1

687/4डि

522/2

579/4

736/1 ए

802/3

629/2ए

630/4

683/1

686

694/1वी

565 GI/05-16

10 00

19 00

51 00

24 00

36 00

62 00

18 00

39 00

32 00

41 00

00 00

05 00

89 00

03 00

91 00

26 00

28 00

60 00

(सीएल)

22 00

30 00

36 00

42 00

70 (सी एल)

80 2116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 5, 2005/ PHALGUNA 14, 1926

522/5

1)आरगालनु निरंतर

598/2

603

629/4डि

606

576

691/1

698

574

602

597

371

627/1

630/7

693/1

689/2

689/1वी

694/2सी

635/6

631

632/4

632/3

598/1

503

693/ 2ए

802/1

630/10

630/12

630/11

629/5वी

629/5ए

629/4वी

629/4मी

632/ 2डि

692/1वी

359/10

600

370/4

370/3मी

629/1

690/5

370/2

692/ 1 ए

370/3वी

370/ 3ए

369/1 मी

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00

88 (मी एल)

06 00

24 (मी एल)

73 00

93 (मी एल)

65 (मीएल)

11 00

(मीएल)

35 (गी एल)

54 (मी एल )

27 (नी एल)

(मी एल)

08 (मी एल)

22 00

(मी एल)

27 00

32 00

83 00

98 00

80 00

03 00

52 00

00 00

08 00

38 00

35 00

68 00

00 00

09 00

34 00

42 00

22386 61 00

56 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2117

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

2 1) भागाालन निग्नर

601/10

372/1

369/1वी

369/2ए

601/1बी

367/ 2 ए

369/1 ए

367/ 2वी

629/ 2वी

368/4

525/1

368/3

369/ 2वी

526/4डि

523/1

601/2 ए

372/2

690/3वी

523/3ए

523/2

601/1 एफ

367/3

601/1 ई

601/1सी

795

595/2

596

10/3एफ

2)अरुल्ला अग्रहारम

203/3

189

203/5

182

252

181/7वी

180/4

264/2

180/5

179

273

178/1

208/2

264/3

206/10

265/13

206/9

60 00

20 00

72 00 .

93 00

50 00

36 00

64 00

24 00

92 00

05 00

54 00

07 00

44 00

84 00

46 00

70 00

95 00

67 00

93 00

28 (सी एल)

75 (सीएल)

84 00

27 00

32 00

10 00

(सी एल)

21 00

04 00

23 00

17 00

08 2118

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

206/7

2)अगुल्ला अगडाग्म निग्नर

265/12

205

175

183

208/3

185/3वी

265/ 8 ए

188

263/7

262/1

262/2

204/2

295/3

295/1 वी

265/5

137

136

203/4

264/4

13/4वी

13/4मी

13/3

204/1

144/2

145/2ए

14/4

91/1

204/4

90/9ए

90/9वी

251/4

251/7

14/2

265/4

13/1वी

265/7

10/3

12/1

13/2

10/4

145/1

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

32 00

85 (मी एन)

14 00

(गी एल)

28 00

10 00

69 (मी एल)

60 00

(मी एल।

44 00

04 00

95 00

42 00

(मीएल)

09 (सी एल)

11 00

(सी एल)

78 00

13 00

49 00

46 00

73 00

(सी एल)

30 00

55 00

50 (जी एल)

35 00

50 00

20 00

17 00

31 00

65 00

21 00

22 00

24 00

80 00

33 00

43 00

04 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2119

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

265/6 2) अगुल्ला अग्रहारम निरंतर

185/ 3ए

91/2

140/1

201/1

144/3

144/1

145/3

251/2

141/1

295/2

141/2

142

143/2

172

262/3

251/6

251/5

204/3

173

589/3 3)जगन्नाद पुरम

595/3

594/1

595/5वी

592/3

592/1 वी

592/1सी

593/1 ए

590/2वी

590/ 2सी

594/3

595/4

609

597/1

590/1

590/ 2ए

595/1वी

595/2

595/5ए

598/5वी

588

589/1

589/2

596/1

597/2 3

5 00

45 00

34 00

11 00

79 00

(जी एल)

00 00

05 00

51 00

86 (सी एल)

91 00

82 00

00 00

56 00

33 00

10 00

59 (सी एल)

31 00

92 00

59 00

54 00

84 00

29 00

94 00

26 00

52 00 2120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

4)कडकटल

59/2

269

122

67/1

61/1

271/1 ए

21/3

62/2

21/1

68/1

59/1

67/2

58/2

27/2

26/4

26/1

25/ 2सी

25/2बी

25/ 2ए

25/1

62/4ए

67/3

29/2

21/2

270

66/3ए

66/3वी

66/2मी

120

62/6बी

121

271/2

271/3

271/4ए

20/3

62/1

370

5)कोन्डुपोलु

429

417/1

335/3

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

5 3

31 (जी एल)

38 (जी एल)

14 00

(मी एल)

16 00

(मी एल)

79 (मीएल)

07 00

(मी एल)

59 00

(मीएल)

75 00

29 (मा एल)

44 00

10 00

92 00

53 00

34 00

90 00

46 00

62 00

00 00

61 00

00 00

99 00

48 00

30 00

76 00

33 00

73 00

48 00

19 00

50 00

76 00

86 00

74 (जी एल)

89 (मी एल)

18 00

31 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2121

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

334 5)कोन्डुपोलु निरंतर

428/1

416

-423/2

417/3

418

333

427

426

335/2

417/7

335/1

369

232/1 6)कुन्चनपल्लि

287/1

254

253/1

238/2

238/3

238/4

239/5

239/7

223/2

252/1

223/1

252/2

285/1

253/3

285/2

219

287/2

276/2

276/1

277/5

218

217

216

215

214/3

214/2

234

3/1 7)नवाबुपालेम

5/2बी

5 00

49 00

60 00

16 (मी एल)

81 00

10 00

76 00

(मी एल)

09 (जी एल)

64 (मी एल)

31 00

47 00

38 (मीएल)

77 00

(जी एल)

15 00

(जी एल)

(मो एल)

58 00

17 00

71 00

29 00

31 00

13 00

09 00

20 (जी एल)

70 00

41 00

85 00

07 00

28 00

42 00

52 00

62 (सीएल)

08 2122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/1 HALGUNA 14 , 1926

7) नवानुपालेम निरंतर

5/3एफ

5/ 2ए

5/3मी

5/3ए

3/2

5/ 6वी

5/5

5/7

5/6ए

5/1

5/4

5/3जी

1119/1मी

8)ताडपल्ल

1116

988/3

1119/1 वी

1132/3ई

1121/ 2बी

1132/3डि

1036

1035/3ए

1111/2

1114/3

1121/1दी

1120/2बी

1035/3बी

1113/ 2सी

1121/2ई

1120/ 2सी

1120/1

1106/1 ए

1120/ 2ए

1113/ 2वी

1132/3जी

1114/2

1133/2

1058/3

1118

1119/1 ए

1033

1120/ 2 ई

1134/1

1133/1

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 3

37 (मी एल)

69 00

37 00

65 00

13 00

10 00

34 00

95 00

03 00

53 00

03 (मी एल)

59 00

35 00

66 00

10 00

42 00

71 00

57 00

99 00

17 00

65 00

51 00

23 00

27 00

35 00

64 00

02 00

04 (सीएल)

42 (सीएल)

(सी एल)

55 (सी एल)

89 00

80 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2123

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

988/2

8)ताडपल्लं निरंतर

1132/3हेच

1035/2ए

1132/ 3एफ

1120/ 2डि

987

1115/2

988/1

1061/1

989/6

1035/ 2मी

1035/ 2वी

1132/ 3अई

1029/2

1035/1

1035/4ए

1030/5ए

1030/4ए

1030/4थी

1030/4सी

1030/5वी

1030/2

1029/4

1029/3

1029/8

1029/9

978/3

978/4

1115/1

1035/4सी

1030/1

6/1

9)ताडेपल्लि गूडेग

162/2

6/2

मंडलः उंदाजवरम

5 3

58 00

60 00

10 00

90 00

66 00

33 00

10 00

43 00

59 00

10 00

20 00

80 00

74 00

28 00

19 00

96 00

36 00

10 00

63 00

33 00

22 00

33 00

रााज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिल्का: बेस्ट गोदावरि

2/1

1)दम्मेन्नु

2/ 2ए

2)काल्दरि

259/70

259/8ए

259/3

292/3सी

275/3

565 G1 /05-17

14 00

79 (सी एल)

74 00

13 00

53 00

83 00 2124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

275/1

2)काल्दरि निरंतर

275/2

274/2ए

274/1 ए

259/2वी

274/1वी

229/21

272/7

396

401

293

257

309

353

310

352/2

254/3

259/5ए

352/1बी

229/10

254/5

254/2

254/1

229/22

229/11

229/9

272/6

254/6

357/2ए

274/1सी

350/4

385

351/5

351/7

351/4ए

342/3

342/ 2बी

342/1बी

342/1 ए

292/4

254/4

273/1

356

255/2

410/1

311/ 2ए

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 3

5 00

35 00

56 00

33 00

72 00

05 00

51 00

78 00

74 00

(मीएल)

44 (मी एल)

38 (मी एल)

86 (मी एल)

73 00

(मीएल)

59 (मीएल)

45 (मी एल)

86 (मीएल)

66 00

46 00

66 00

93 00

86 00

77 00

10 00

88 00

66 00

87 00

94 00

73 (सी एल)

76 00

38 00

10 00

27 00

65 00

10 00

31 00

35 00

31 00

25 00

45 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2125

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

399/3

2)काल्दरि निरंतर

352/1 ए

399/2

400/1 वी

400/1 ए

400/20

386/ 7वी

259/6ए

410/ 2ए

311/1 ची

409/1 ए

256/1 वी

256/1 ए

259/5वी

289/ए

259/ 5मी

259/5ন্তি

291/3

291/2

290/3मी

255/1

290/3वी

386/7सी

370/ 6एफ

311/1 ए

369

357/ 2वी

357/4

357/5

387

368

370/6ई

398/3

370/6जी

384/1वी

386/6सी

398/3ভি

398/3सी

255/3

290/4

290/5

384/2

386/6वी

384/4सी

384/4थी

44 00

51 (मी एल )

19 00

53 00

16 00

97 00

45 00

65 00

25 (जीएल)

76 00 .

50 00

78 00

55 00

79 00

67. (सी एल)

45 00

10 00

79 00

37 (सीएल)

70 00

00 00

56 00

45 00

22 00

98 00

64 00

10 00

49 00

87 2126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

3) पमलपूडि

315/3मी

315/3ए

315/3वी

312/2

318

322

315/2

11/5

317

315/4

20/1

16/7

11/8

11/9

17/3

17/4

17/5

17/2

17/10

17/6

17/7

17/9

17/8

26/2

53/17

53/3वी

53/16

321/1

316/2

316/1

308/8

308/9

308/7

308/5

308/6

308/2

308/3

308/1

21/2

8/2

312/3

312/5

312/4

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 3

5 00

33 (मी एल)

08 00

24 00

(मी एल)

33 00

(मीएल)

77 (मी एल)

48 00

14 00

(मी एल)

34 00

25 00

46 00

42 00

14 00

76 00

17 00

73 00

66 00

21 00

06 00

65 00

16 00

20 00

82 00

64 00

67 00

01 00

61 00

51 00

11 00

60 00

59 00

10 00

59 00 2127

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii)]

309/6

3)पसलपूडि निरंतर

312/7

312/8

309/4

312/9

11/3

11/2

315/1

24/4

49/1

312/1

9/4

9/1

9/3

9/2

9/5

24/3

24/1

24/2

24/6

24/7

26/1

12/4

28/1

11/6

6 3

58 00

10 00

98 00

34 00

55 00

74 00

33 00

53 00

18 00

41 00

65 00

67 00

10 00

87 00

[फा. सं. एल-14014/9/2003-जी.पी. ] एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 1st March , 2005

S. O. 770.-Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural gas number S.O. 1651 dated the 11th June, 2003, issued under sub- section ( 1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of natural gas from the exploration blocks in the Northern/Southern Offshore of Goa and Structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited, the promoter company of M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to various consumers of Districts East Godavari and West Godavari in the State of Andhra Pradesh by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 30th June, 2003;

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have beenconsidered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;

2128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii )] And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the Pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired, for laying the ¡pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest, on this date of publication of the declaration , in Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, free from all encumbrances .

Schedule

State: Andhra Pradesh Mandal : ALAMURU

District: East Godavari

Avea to be acquired

ROU

Village

Survey No./Sub-Division No

C-Are

Hectare Are

61/6

15 1) Badugunivanilanka

57 61/9

20 59

(CL)

27 63/4

134

(GL)

40/4

(GL)

29 44/3

65 44/2

44/1

19 38/6

(CL)

72 133

(GL)

70 44/5

59 38/5

40/2

40/3

29 40/5

07 54/2

72 63/3

32 61/8

43/1

2)Gowtami Godavari River

(CL)

RiverBetweenVillage Boundaries

Total

81 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2129

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

2 3)Madiki

98/2

31/1

37/2

167/1

37/3

38/3

38/4

14/2

40/1

96/4

97/2

15/1

96/5

31/2

47/2

47/3

47/5

47/4

39/7A

171/4A

39/6

95/4

171/1B

167/5

39/7B

98/1

97/1

172/2

171/13B

171/118

21/6

172/5

38/5

16/4

39/5

171/14

172/1

170/1

168/5

168/4

166/2

167/4

14/3

95/3

38/2

95/2

5 00

18 00

89 00

10 00

54 00

81 00

14.

23 00

64 00

15 00

42 00

87 00

$32 00

33 (CL)

46 (GL)

25 00

84 00

02 28

10 00

17 00

48 (CL)

22 00

72 (CL)

01 00

(CL)

79 (CL)

71 (CL)

03 (CL)

59 00

33 00

78 00

61 00

95 00

88 00

53 00

10 00

06 00 00 00 8888

37 2130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

21/5

3) Madiki ( Contd ... )

21/4

16/6

16/5

93/1

89/1

89/2

89/3

89/4

95/5

District: East Godavari

Mandal : ATREYAPURAM

20/9

1) ATREYAPURAM

20/7A

20/6A

18/5C

18/4C

20/5

79/1

20/6B

29/2A

29/1

18/18

18/7C

16/1

18/2A

29/28

16/8

29/4B

29/3B

18/6C

18/10

18/9

18/8C

20/6C

79/2

20/4

18/2B

16/7B

16/6

20/3

77/1

20/11

18/8A

77/2

79/3

20/12

20/10

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

60 00

10 00

74 00

51 00

17 00

40 00

66 00

State : Andhra Pradesh 00

63 00

46 00

37 00

97 00

03 00

55 (CL)

84 (CL)

03 (CL)

(CL)

56 00

(CL)

30 00

(CL)

64 00

31 00

43 00

10 00

33 00

40 00

10 00

83 00

(GL)

62 (GL)

10 00

61 00

20 00

76 00

28 00

00 2131

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

68/3

2) VASANTAVADA

72/18C

72/19C

72/20

64/3

71/16

71/1

107/1

71/7A

72/16

67/18

70/5

67/12

71 /2A

70/6

64/1

67/17

67/16

67/15

72/17C

67/13

70/4

67/11

67/10

67/9

67/19

109/8

68/2

72/15A

67/14

72/4A

65/1

68/1

117/1A2

108

72/18A

72/17A

72/19A

64/2

65/2

5 00

45 00

51 (GL)

42 00

21 (GL)

02 00

82 00

17 00

20 00

34 00

16 00

42 00

(CL)

96 (CL)

(CL)

05 00

(CL)

10 00

84 (CL)

(CL) 00

93 03

Between River and Village Boundary

3) VASISTA GODAVARI RIVER

55/4

VUCHCHILI

37/1

37/4A

40/2

39/7

55/2

565 G1/05-18

(CL)

58 00

03 00

10 00

(CL) 2132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

2 1

37/3

VUCHCHILI (Contd...)

38/1

37/2B

25/6

40/1

25/7

61/3

55/3B

39/5

55/3A

District: East Godavari

Mandal : KADIYAM

146

1) MURAMANDA

246/9

246/15

247/3

247/1

247/2

248/1

144/2

390/4

65/3

390/8

246/6

390/5

247/4

150/2

151/2

392/3

390/6

145/4

89/4

143/2

144/3

144/1

151/3

150/1

145/6

151/4

154/1

154/2

41/4

41/3

143/1

145/5

144/4

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] :, 3

5 00

45 00

(CL)

19 00

58 (CL)

88 00

03 00

98 00

43 00

(CL)

State : Andhra Pradesh

67 00

53 00

61 00

12 00

58 00

66 00

03 00

78 00

89 00

69 00

23 00

17 00

77 00

70.

13 00

41 00

53 00

10 00

52 00

72 00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2133

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

363/2 1) MURAMANDA( Contd ... )

246/7

363/4

271/2

390/

4022

364

69/2

365

392/1

390/3

345/2

344/1

269/3

392/2

402/1

367

270/2

275

274/2

271/3

348/1

271/1

363/1

368

389/4

369/2

369/1

369/3

369/4

369/6

370/1

246/5

261/2

348/2

389/7

389/1

389/10

389/8

269/2

389/3

262

90/1

260

390/2 3

47 00

82 00

31 00

43 00

52 00

01 00

17 00

45 00

78 00

90 00

75 00

35 00

10 00

50 00

59 00

51 00

55 00

62 00

93 00

55 00

39 00

60 00

12 00

14 2134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

272/1 1) MURAMANDA( Contd ... )

270/1

363/5

390/7

269/1

85/2

246/4

89/5

88/1

85/5

389/2

85/6

388/5

83/2

83/1

61/3

65/4

89/2

65/2

85/4

153

139

342

142 Mandal : MANDAPETA

1) EDIDA

94/1

41/2

41/3

45/1

81/3

76/1

81/4

103/2

44/1

94/2

40/2

94/3

94/4

98/3

95/1

38/1

[PART II -SEC . 3(ii)]

5 00

16 00

29 00

50 00

47 00

10 00

30 00

10 00

51 00

55 00

94 00

12 00

53 00

27 00

50 00

86 (CL)

49 (CL)

04 (CL) 00

26 (CL) 00

13 00

(CL)

77 (CL)

District: East Godavari

State: Andhra Pradesh

77 00

57 00

54 00

87 00

45 00

50 00

51 00

30 00

53 00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2135

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

96/3A

1 ) EDIDA ( Contd ... )

97/7

96/2

96/1

81/2

36/2B

105

40/1

101

Mandal : PERAVALI

66 00

51 00

67 00

13 00

50 (CL)

75 (CL)

67 (CL)

03 00

08 00

(CL)

08 (CL)

14 00

(CL)

District: West Godavari

1) KANURU ( AGRAHARAM)

7/3A2

7/3B

7/1

7/2

8/2C

8/20

8/2B

7/3A1

BetweenVg Boundary& Sy No 34

Between Vg Boundary&SyNo 5

187/6

2)KANURU (ZAMINDARI )

187/8C

187/3

187/4

187/8B

196/4

187/7

186/9D

187/5

173

353

196/3

197/3

197/6

169/15

207/8

State: Andhra Pradesh 00

48 (CL)

68 (CL)

10 (CL)

02 00

07 00

64 00

(CL)

30 00

55 00

(GL)

69 03

(GL)

69 00

59 00

52 00

31 00

35 00

30 00

35 00

30 00

72 00

68 00

50 00

(CL)

00 2136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

354

2) KANURU ( ZAMINDARI ) ( Contd... )

32/7

187/10

32/2

33/2

174/4

207/3

207/2B

207/ 2A

169/5

174/3

169/3

169/2

169/1

171/3

170/1

175/7

207/7

169/4

204/1

169/6

207/9B

207/1

196/1

196/5A

196/5B

204/3B

207/9A

204/2

169/14

206/3

206/2

206/1B

206/4

188

207/6

204/3A

187/9

33/5

360

33/6

30/2

32/1

33/7

33/4

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 01

35 00

00 (CL)

22 00

36 00

13 00

83 00

11 00

08 00

49 (CL)

03 00

77 00

28 00

80 00

09 00

15 00

78 00

00 00

30 00

89 00

52 00

32 00

54 00

91 (CL)

67 00

57 00

93 00

48 00

34 00

58 00

10 00

86 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2137

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

196/2

2) KANURU ( ZAMINDARI )(Contd ... )

355

Tuiai

14/1

3) NADUPALLE

44/8

154/5

53/1B

149/6

14/4

29/10A

29/9

29/10B

53/1A

15/22

45/2

154/4

43/3A

43/3B

54/5

43/4

49/8

43/5

43/6

49/7

40/11

41/5

45/1

72/4

54/4

154/3

75/1

75/2

16/8A

73/7

154/7

73/5

16/6

154/6

72/7B

73/8

72/5

15/18B

72/2

77/1

74/6

5 00

66 00

53 00

10 00

48 00

23 00

79 00

76 00

63 00

79 00

90 00

76 00

90 00

58 00

23 00

00 00

10 00

43 00

60 00

04 00

95 00

41 00

50 00

32 00

18 00

36 00

54 00

80 00

87 00

42 00

03 00

31 00

10 00

85 2138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

17/6

3) NADUPALLE ( Contd ... )

73/4

77/3

154/10A

14/2

15/18A

50/2B

54/1C

72/7A

15/21

50/3

54/2

149/4

149/1

149/2

29/11

150/2

42/4

43/8

50/4

41/4

149/5

16/5

54/1B

54/1A

150/1F

41/2

72/3

149/3

154/8

42/5

150/6

150/7

150/1E

16/8B

151

153/6

74/5

153/ 5B

43/7

155/9

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

10 00

01 00

10 00

93 00

98 00

21 00

16 00

76 00

83 00

46 00

10 00

70 00

02 00

(CL)

61 00

13 (CL)

30 00

63 00

66 00

78 00

54 00

78 00

43 00

58 00

40 00

26 00

18 00

56 00

(CL)

86 00

01 (CL)

90 00

10 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2139

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005 /फाल्गुन 14,1926

2 1

154/2

3) NADUPALLE ( Contd... )

41/6

43/9

41/3

16/7

72/1

District:West Godavari

Mandal : TADEPALLIGUDEM

510/6

1) ARUGOLANU

504

733/2

575/2

690/2

630/9

687/4C

522/6

683/2

694/1A

694/2A

694/2B

523/3B

630/5

523/3F

522/3

522/4

629/3A

629/3B

802/2

635/7

681/4

681/3

681/2

681/1

636/4B

636/4A

733/1

687/4D

522/2

579/4

736/1A

802/3

629/2A

630/4

683/1

686

694/1B

565 G1/05-19

5 00

59 00

74 00

05 00

86 00

48 (CL)

State: Andhra Pradesh 00

10 00

19 00

51 00

10 00

24 00

34 00

36 00

23 00

20 00

97 00

18 00

24 00

39 00

32 00

41 00

91 00

00 00

15 00

05 00

89 00

03 00

91 00

48 00

26 00

64 00

60 (CL)

22 00

36 00

20 00

42 00

70 (CL)

80 2140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

522/5

1 ) ARUGOLANU( Contd ... )

598/2

603

629/4D

606

576

691/1

698

574

602

597

371

627/1

630/7

693/1

689/2

689/1B

694/2C

635/6

631

632/4

632/3

598/1

503

693/2A

802/1

630/10

630/12

630/11

629/5B

629/5A

629/4B

629/4C

632/2D

692/1B

359/10

600

370/4

370/3C

629/1

690/5

370/2

692/1A

370/3B

370/3A

369/1C

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 3

5 00

88 (CL)

06 00

24 (CL)

73 00

93 (CL)

(CL)

11 (CL)

35 (CL)

54 (CL)

27 (CL)

(CL)

08 (CL)

22 (CL)

27 00

36 00

84 00

96 00

83 00

24 00

03 00

14 00

52 00

00 00

07 00

08 00

38 00

29 00

06 00

68 00

94 00

00 00

09 00

18 00

26 00

34 00

22 00

61 00

56 2141

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

601/1A

1 ) ARUGOLANU( Contd ... )

372/1

369/1B

369/2A

601/18

367/2A

369/1A

367/2B

629/2B

368/4

525/1

368/3

369/2B

526/4D

523/1

601/ 2A

372/2

690/3B

523/3A

523/2

601/1F

367/3

601/1E

601/1C

795

595/2

596

10/3F

2) ARULLA( AGRAHARAM)

203/3

189

203/5

182

252

181/7B

180/4

264/2

180/5

179

273

178/1

208/2

264/3

206/10

265/13

206/9

5 00

20 00

72 00

06 00

93 00

50 00

80 00

47 00

80 00

05 00

00.

29 00

08 00

52 00

44 00

84 00

24 00

98 00

73 00

46 00

95 00

67 00

93 00

28 (CL)

93 00

72 00

(CL)

84 00

27 00

32 00

77 00

(CL)

21 00

04 00

23 00

17 00

99 2142

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

2 2) ARULLA(AGRAHARAM) ( Contd ..) 206/7

265/12

205

175

183

208/3

185/3B

92.

265/8A

188

263/7

262/1

262/2

204/2.

295/3

295/1B

265/5

137

136

203/4

264/4

13/4B

13/4C

13/3

204/1

144/2

145/2A

14/4

91/1

204/4

90/9A

90/98

251/4

251/7

14/2

265/4

13/1B

265/7

10/3E

12/1

13/2

10/4

145/1

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

5 00

32 00

61 00

28 00

(CL)

28 00

10 00

69 (CL)

60 (CL)

62 00

44 00

04 00

95 00

83 00

51 00

42 (CL)

74 00

09 (CL)

11 (CL)

78 00

00.

49 00

46 00

73 (CL)

30 00

55 00

50 (GL)

35 00

50 00

20 00

17 00

65 00

92 00

21 00

22 00

23 00

24 00

80 00

33 00

43 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2143

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

2 1

2)ARULLA( AGRAHARAM )(Contd.. ) 265/6

185/3A

91/2

140/1

201/1

144/3

144/1

145/3

251/2

141/1

295/2

141/2

142

143/2

172

262/3

251/6

251/5

204/3

173

589/3

3) JAGANNADHA PURAM

595/3

594/1

595/5B

592/3

592/1B

592/1C

593/ 1A

590/2B

590/2C

594/3

595/4

609

597/1

590/1

590/2A

595/1B

595/2

595/5A

598/5B

588

589/1

589/2

596/1

597/2

5 3

60 00

01 00

73 00

34 00

16 00

01 00

11 00

(GL)

05 00

22 00

51 00

32 00

86 (CL)

79 00

92 00

91 00

32 00

57 00

00 00

41 00

33 00

61 00

10 00

59 (CL)

41 00

59 00

84 00

07 00

94 00

56 00

26 00

10 2144

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

4) KADAKATLA

59/2

269

122

67/1

61/1

271/1A

21/3

62/2

21/1

68/1

59/1

67/2

58/2

27/2

26/4

26/1

25/2C

25/2B

25/2A

25/1

62/4A

67/3

29/2

21/2

270

66/3A

66/3B

66/2C

120

62/6B

121

271/2

271/3

271/4A

20/3

62/1

370

5) KONDRUPROLU

429

417/1

335/3

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)]

31 00

(GL)

38 00

(GL)

14 (CL)

(CL)

79 00

(CL)

07 (CL)

59 (CL)

75 00

29 (CL)

44 00

29 00

10 00

92 00

53 00

34 00

98 00

94 00

46 00

62 00

11 00

00 00

51 00

61 00

99 00

30 00

76 00

00 00

33 00

80 00

39 00

19 00

49 00

50 00

76 00

86 00

(GL)

89 (CL)

66 00

18 2145

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005 /फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भोग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

334

5) KONDRUPROLU ( Contd ... )

428/1

416

423/2

417/3

418

333

427

426

335/2

417/7

335/1

369

232/1

6) KUNCHANAPALLI

287/1

254

253/1

238/2

238/3

238/4

239/5

239/7

223/2

252/1

223/1

252/2

285/1

253/3

285/2

219

287/2

276/2

276/1

277/5

218

217

216

215

214/3

214/2

234

3/1

7) NAVABUPALEM

5/2B

5 00

49 00

60 00

16 (CL)

10 00

44 00

76 (CL)

09 (GL)

(CL)

31 00

(CL)

77 (GL)

15 00

(GL)

07 (CL)

85 00

58 00

17 00

71 00

29 00

74 00

13 00

09 00

70 00

20 (GL)

70 00

63 00

85 00

07 00

46 00

09 00

42 00

52 00

62 (CL)

08 2146

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

7) NAVABUPALEM ( Contd ... )

5/3F

5/2A

5/3C

5/3A

3/2

5/6B

5/5

5/7

5/6A

5/1

5/4

5/3G

8) TADEPALLE

1119/1C

1116

988/3

1119/1B

1132/3E

1121/2B

1132/3D

1036

1035 /3A

1111/2

1114/3

1121/1B

1120/2B

1035/3B

1113/2C

1121/2E

1120/ 2C

1120/1

1106/1A

1120/ 2A

1113/2B

1132/3G

1114/2

1133/2

1058/3

1118

1119/1A

1033

1120/2E

1134/1

1133/1

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 3

37 (CL)

69 00

80 00

37 00

65 00

33 00

13 00

69 00

53 00

03 00

(CL)

35 00

17 00

42 00

99 00

17 00

51 00

55 00

51 00

35 00

04 00

(CL)

42 (CL)

69 (CL)

55 00

(CL)

40 00

89 00

80 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2147

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

2 1

988/2

8) TADEPALLE ( Contd ... )

1132/3H

1035/2A

1132/3F

1120/2D

987

1115/2

988/1

1061/1

989/6

1035/ 2C

1035/2B

1132/31

1029/2

1035/1

1035/ 4A

1030/5A

1030/4A

1030/4B

1030/4C

1030/5B

1030/2

1029/4

1029/3

1029/8

1029/9

978/3

978/4

1115/1

1035/4C

1030/1

6/1

9) TADEPALLIGUDEM

162/2

6/2

Mandal : UNDRAJAVARAM

District: West Godavari

2/1

1) DAMMENNU

2/2A

259/7A

2) KALDHARI

259/8A

259/3

292/ 3C

275/3

565 G1 /05-20

58 00

66 00

37 00

33 00

10 00

59 00

10 00

20 00

00 00

74 00

43 00

28 00

96 00

00 00

36 00

10 00

66 00

63 00

69 00

22 00

33 00

State : Andhra Pradesh

14 00

79 (CL)

74 00

13 00

40 00

26 00

29 2148

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

275/1

2) KALDHARI ( Contd ...)

275/2

274/2A

274/1A

259/2B

274/1B

229/21

272/7

396

401

293

257

309

353

310

352/2

254/3E

259/ 5A

352/18

229/10

254/5

254/2

254/1

229/22

229/11

229/9

272/6

254/6

357/2A

274/1C

350/4

385

351/5

351/7

351/4A

342/3

342/28

342/1B

342/1A

292/4

254/4

273/1

356

255/2

410/1

311/2A

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

5 00

35 00

33 00

72 00

05 00

51 00

78 00

74 (CL)

44 00

(CL)

38 (CL)

86 (CL)

73 (CL)

59 (CL)

45 (CL)

86 (CL)

37 00

93 00

77 00

62 00

33 00

10 00

66 00

19 00

94 00

73 (CL)

38 00

10 00

21 00

27 00

65 00

10 00

96 00

31 00

10 00

35 00

31 00

45 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2149

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

399/3

2) KALDHARI (Contd ... )

352/1A

399/2

400/1B

400/1A

400/2A

386/7B

259/6A

410/2A

311/1B

409/1A

256/1B

256/1A

259/5B

289/A

259/5C

259/5D

291/3

291/2

290/3C

255/1

290/3B

386/7C

370/6F

311/1A

369

357/2B

357/4

357/5

387

368

370/6E

398/3E

370/6G

384/1B

386/6C

398/3D

398/3C

255/3

290/4

290/5

384/2

386/6B

384/4C

384/4B

44 00

51 (CL)

10 00

19 -00

53 00

07 00

16 00

97 00

06 00

45 00

65 00

35 00

52 00

25 (GL)

75 00

41 00

86 00

76 00

50 00

79 00

33 00

67 (CL)

45 00

10 00

79 00

37 (CL)

00 00

56 00

41 00

36 00

22 00

53 00

22 00

98 00

10 00

49 00

87 2150

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

3) PASALAPUDI

315/3C

315/ 3A

315/3B

312/2

318

322

315/2

11/5

317

315/4

20/1

16/7

11/8

11/9

17/3

17/4

17/5

17/2

17/10

17/6

17/7

17/9

17/8

26/2

53/17

53/3B

53/16

321/1

316/2

316/1

308/8

308/9

308/7

308/5

308/6

308/2

308/3

308/1

21/2

8/2

312/3

312/5

312/4

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] 3

5 00

(CL)

08 00

24 00

19 00

(CL)

33 00

02 (CL)

77 (CL)

59 00

14 00

(CL)

58 00

25 00

58 00

46 00

84 00

35 00

57 00

76 00

17 00

66 00

21 00

06 00

60 00

20 00

64 00

67 00

01 00

33 00

51 00

11 00

59 00

10 00

59 2151 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

309/6

3) PASALAPUDI ( Contd ... )

312/7

312/8

309/4

312/9

11/3

11/2

315/1

24/4

49/1

312/1

9/4

9/1

9/3

9/2

9/5

65 24/3

24/1

24/2

24/6

24/7

26/1

12/4

28/1

87 11/6

[ F. No. L -14014/9/2003-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 771 .-- केंद्रीय सरकारे को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि बूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिमुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयेंल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय कीघोषणा करती है ;

2152

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक : उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी, पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

सर्कल : दोटमा

राज्य : असम

जिला : कोकराझार

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर

दाग सं .

एयर

6 2

450

93 प्रतापखाटा (भाग 1 )

296

295

[फा. सं . ओ-12016/10/2004- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 771.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua, Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayarı Vihar , Guwahati - 731171 (Assam).

SCHEDULE

State : Assam

District: Kokrajhar

Circle: Dotma

Area

Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

Dag no.

Sr. No

Name of the Village

450

1 Pratapkhata ( Part -1 )

296

295

[No. O -12016/10/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/ फाल्गुन 14, 1926

2153

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का . आ. 772.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि बूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक : उदयन विहार , गुवाहाटी , पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची सर्कल गोसाईगाँव

राज्य : असम

जिला : कोकराझार

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

दाग सं .

505 1 श्रीरामपुर

504

435

432

499

83 2 सिमुलटापु (भाग 3 )

261 3 सिमुलटापु (भाग 2)

247

246 4 सिमुलटापु ब्लाक

195

104

क्षेत्रफल

एयर

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर 4

37 0

58 0

26 0

33 0

05 0

44 0

45 0

49 0

33 0

44 0

20 0

40 0

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/ 10/2004- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 / PHALGUNA 14. 1926

2154

New Deihi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 772.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal), a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire theright of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh- Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

SCHEDULE

State : Assam

District : Kokrajhar

Circle : Gossaigaon

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr. Sr. No

Name of the Village

Dag no.

505

1 Shri Rampur

504

435

432

499

2 Simultapu ( Part-III )

261

3 Simultapu ( Part- II )

247

246-

195

104

4 Simultapu Block

[No. O- 12016/10/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. -IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

2155 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/ फाल्गुन 14,1926

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 773. - केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 18 दिसम्बर, 2004 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 3205 तारीख 14 , दिसम्बर, 2004 , पृष्ठ 9655 से 9658 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है अर्थात :-

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में

" पृष्ठ 9656 पर स्तभ 1 में ग्राम बासुगाँव टाउन (भाग 1 ) " के सामने :

(i) पंक्ति 1 ,दाग संख्या 693 के स्थान पर 960 पैर्दे

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/10/2004- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर संचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 773. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) . , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , number S.O. 3205, dated the 14th December'04, published at pages 9658 to 9661 in Part-ll , Section 3 , Sub- section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India dated the 18th December , 2004 namely: -

In the schedule to the said notification:

At page 9659, against village " Basugaon Town ( Part -I ) " .

(i ) Line 1 , for Dag no.693 read 960 .

[No. O- 12016/10/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

565 G1/ 05-21 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2156

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 774. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक : उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी, पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : बरपेटा

राज्य : असम

बरनगर (सरभोग)

सर्कल :

वर्ग मीटर

क्षेत्रफल एयर

हेक्टेयर

दाग सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

1 भुलुकाढोबा

560 706 707

[ फा. सं. ओ-12016/9/2004-ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 774.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

2157 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14,1926

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire theright of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua, Competent Authority, Numaligarh- Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, Pipeline Head Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar , Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

SCHEDULE

State : Assam

District : Barpeta

Circle ; Barnagar(Sorbhog )

Area Are

Sq.mtr .

Hectare

Sr. No

Dag no.

Name of the Village

560

Bhulukadoba

706

707

[No O- 12016/9/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 775. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी, पिन 781171. (असम ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 2158

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

अनुसूची सीडली

सर्कल

[PART II- SFC 3 ( 1 )] राज्य : असम

जिला : बंगाईगावॅ

दाग सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

3 1

पेटलागावॅ

446 1

449

254

255

256

453

454

466

455

279

280

285

284

283

282

215

217

184

177

183

182

179

180

414

394

330

डांगटोला

354

353

352

351

343

344

342

345

340

198

199

196

197

173

172

171

दबली

126 3

125

123

119

330

122

121 क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग , मीटर

6 4

85 0

47 0

60 0

73 0

2 0

25 0

58 0

7 0

56 0

97 0

55 0

86 0

81 0

1 0

97 0

85 0

86 0

54 0

72 0

35 0

43 0

33 0

0 2159

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

सर्कल सीडली

राज्य : असभ

जिला : बंगाईगावें

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

दाग सं.

एयर

6 2

121

दबली

112

111

109

108

333

106

107

358

52 कमरडंगा

357

359

46 5

313

चिलागुरी

195/374

202/379

203/400

204

[फा. सं. ओ -12016/8/2004-ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S O. 775.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar , Guwahati - 781171 (Assam) .

2160

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

SCHEDULE Circle : Sidli

District : Bongaigaon

Sr. No

Dag no. Name of the Village

3 1

446 1

Petlagaon

449

254

255

256

453

454

466

455

279

280

285

284

283

282

215

217

184

177

183

182

179

180

414

394

330 2

Dangtol

354

353

352

351

343

344

342

345

340

198

199

196

197

173

172

171

126 3

Dabaly

125

123

119

330

122

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] State : Assam

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

0 2161 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

Sr. No

Area Are Sq.mtr .

Hectare

Name of the Village

Dagno.

6 3

121

44 Dabaly

112

111

109

108

333

106

107

10 4

358

52 Kamardanga

357

359

77 5

313

Ghilaguri

195/374

202/379

203/400

204

[No. O-12016/8 /2004-O.N.G ./D.O. -IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 776.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी , पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 2162

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5. 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूधी

राज्य : असम

सर्कल : : बंगाईगायें

जिला : बंगाईगायें

क्षेत्रफल

दाग सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर गाँव का नाम

क्रभ सं.

6 1

43 1 नयापारा ( भाग 2)

503

04 खारिजा दलायगॉव

[फा. सं. ओ -12016/8/2004- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2005

S. O. 776.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam)to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh - Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar , Guwahati - 781171 (Assam ).

SCHEDULE

State : Assam

District : Bongaigaon

Circle: Bongaigaon

Area Are

Hectare

Dag no .

Sq.mtr. Name of the Village

Sr. No 1

1 Nayapara ( Part 2)

503

2 Kharija Dalaigaon

[No. O -12016/8/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy .

2163 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 777.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड (ii ) तारीख 18 दिसम्बर , 2004 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 3202 तारीख 14 , दिसम्बर , 2004, पृष्ठ 9646 से 9648 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है अर्थात :-

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में

पृष्ठ 9648 पर स्तभ 1 में ग्राम "दाउतिझार" के सामने :

(i) पंक्ति 3 , ट्राग संख्या 107 के स्थान पर 137 पर्दे

[ फा. सं. ओ -12016/2/2004 - ओएनजी- डीओ- IV ] एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 777.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) . , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , number S.O. 3202 , dated the 14th December 04, published at pages 9648 to 9649 in Part-II , Section 3 , Sub-section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India dated the 18th December , 2004 namely: -

In the schedule to the said notification: At page 9649 , against village " Dauthijhar" .

(i) Line 18, for Dag no.107 read 137.

[No. O-12016/8/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. -IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

565 G1 /05-22 PART I- SEC 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

2164

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 778.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय, डाक उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी, पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : असम

जिला : मोरिमाव

सळेल आयेंग

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर

एयर

सं.

दाग सं .

गाँव का नाम

1 बिहिता गाँव

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/6/2004- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन . सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिष [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2165 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005 /फाल्गुन 14,1926

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 778.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh -Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, Pipeline Head Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam) .

SCHEDULE

State : Assam

District: Morigaon

Circle:Mayong

Sr. No

Area Are

Hectare

Name of the Village

Dagno.

Sq.mtr. 1

1 Bihita Gaon

[No. O- 12016/6/2004-O.N.G./D.O. - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 779.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धोरा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड (ii ) तारीख 18 दिसम्बर, 2004 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 3200 तारीख 14, दिसम्बर , 2004, पृष्ठ 9642 से 9643 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है अर्थात :-

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में

पृष्ठ 9643 पर स्तभ 1 में ग्राम "दिगाडु पार" के सामने :

(i) पंक्ति10 , दाग संख्या 412 के स्थान पर 512 पैर्दे

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/5/ 2004- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव 2166

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 779.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) . , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , number S.O. 3200, dated the 14th December 04 , published at pages 9643 to 9644 in Part-II , Section 3 , Sub-section (ii ) of the Gazette of India dated the 18th December , 2004 namely:-

In the schedule to the said notification: Atpage 9644 , against village " Digaru Par" .

(i ) Line 10, for Dag no.412 read 512 .

[No. O-12016 /5/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP. Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 780.- लेन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ,

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है :

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब‌द्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक उदयन विहार , गुवाहाटी, पिन 781171. (असम) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2167

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

अनुसूची

सर्कल बोकाघाट

जिला : गोलाघाट

राज्य : असम

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

दाग सं.

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वर्ग मीटर 1

6 नूमालीगद बगीचा

86 मिकिर सागं बगीचा

1/97

24 बर चापरि बगीचा

33 मूमालीगद एन सी,

[फा. सं. ओ--12016/4/2004-ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 780.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam)-to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh - Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters , P.O. Udayan Vihar , Guwahati - 781171 (Assam).

2168

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

SCHEDULE Circle:Bokahat

[PART II-SEC 3 ( ii ) ] State : Assam

District: Golaghat

Sr No

Name of the Village

Dagno.

3 1

9 Numaligarh Bagisha

1/97 MikirChang Bagisha

56 3 Borchapari Bagisha

1 4 Numaligarh N.C.

Area

Hectare Are

Sq.mtr.

[No. O- 12016/4/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. -IV] N. C. ZAKHUP. Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 781.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूती में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री प्रशान्त कुमार बरुआ, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन मुख्यालय , डाक : उदयन विहार, गुवाहाटी, पिन 781171. (असम ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2169

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14,1926

अनुसूची

सर्कल मोरिगायें

जिला : मोरिगायें

राज्य : असम

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

ढागे सं.

गाँव का नाम

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 1

सोनाबारि हिन्चार्गे

हाति हलगं

320

310

308

307

285

264

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/2/2004-ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 781.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited; Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shń . Prosanta Kumar Borua , Competent Authority, Numaligarh -Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, PipelineHead Quarters, P.O. Udayan Vihar, Guwahati - 781171 (Assam) .

SCHEDULE

State:Assam

District:Morigaon

Circle:Morigaon

Area

Sr.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

Dag no .

Name of the Village

1 Chounabari Dikchang

320

2 Hati Hulung

310

308

307

285

264

[No. O-12016/2/2004- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

2170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 / PHALGUNA 14. 1926

P11- S 3 ( ii ) |

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 782.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाये जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चक्रबोरती , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पंप स्टेशन नं 7 , डाक मदारीहाठ, जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिन 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला : कूचबिहार

पुलिस थाना तुफानगंज 2

गाँव का नाम

पुराना प्लाठ क्रम सं.

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

4 1

1356 1

छाठ भालका

1075

3024 2

रामपुर

क्षेत्रफल

नया प्लाठ संख्या

एयर

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर

1356

1075

3671

3175

183

176

177

178

179

182

192

193

194

195

180

1815 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

2171 2

45678910 10

[फा. सं. ओ-12016 /1/ 2005 - ओएनजी-डीओ-IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 782. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority , Numaligarh - Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited , Pump Station No. 7, P.O. Madarihat , Jalpaiguri District , Pin 735220 (West Bengal) .

565 G1 /05-23 2172

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

SCHEDULE

[PART II - SEC. 3 ( ii) ] State :West Bengal

District : Coochbehar

Police Station: Tufanganj

Old Piot No. Sr No

New Plot No.

Jurisdiction List No.

Name ofthe Village

1356

1356 1

Chhat Bhalka

1075

3024

3671 2

Rampur

187

317

183

176

177

178

179

182

192

193

194

195

1801

181

123 3

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

[No. O-12016/1/2005-O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 783.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोष करती है ;

2173

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चकबोरती , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना, आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पंप स्टेशन नं 7, डाक : मदारीहाठ, जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिन 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

SCHEDULE

PoliceStation : Rajganj

State:WestBengal

District: Jalpaiguri

Jurisdiction List Old Plot NewPlot

NameofVillage

Sr. No

No.

Hectare

Area Are

No.

Sq.mtr. 2

8 1

601

21 Dabgram

604

1610

1488

1487

1486

1484

1612

603

1611

398

396

397

395

478

367

337

368

371

374

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/2/2005- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 783.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

Andwhereasit appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

2174

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority , Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited , Pump Station No. 7 , P.O. Madarihat , Jalpaiguri District , Pin 735220( West Bengal ) .

SCHEDULE

State:West Bengal

District: Jalpaiguri

Police Station : Rajganj

New Plot

Jurisdiction List

Name of Village

No.

Hectare

Area Are

Sr. No

Old Plot No.

No.

Sq.mtr. 1

8 2

601

Dabgram

604

1610

1488

1487

1486

1484

1612

603

1611

398

396

397

395

478

367

337

368

371

374

[No. O- 12016/2/2005- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 784.-- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उत्त्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है । 2175 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( tu) ]

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चकबोरती, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पंप स्टेशन नं 7 , डाक मदारीहाठ , जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिन 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला : जलपाईगुडी

पुलिस थाना : समुखतला

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

नया प्लाठ संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर

पुराना प्लाठ

संख्या

क्रम सं.

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

412

उत्तर पारोकाठा

129

412

410

409

408

321

320

2317

127

1521

चेपानी

1520

2311

2316

1520

2313

1519

2315

1519

2312

1518

2312

1506

2310 }

1506

2309

1507

2307

1505

2306

1503

2305

1501

2290

1427

99 000

425

991

425

792

793

425

9000

어

5 2176

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

पुलिस थामा : समुखतला

[ Pak 11-S 3 ( ii ) ] राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला: जलपाईगुडी

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

क्षेत्रफल

पुराना प्लाठ

संख्या

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या 1

4 3

100

689 कदमपुर

688

687

1055

719

718

717

716

713

711 4

153 पुखुरिया

150

148

151

63 नया प्लाठ संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

689

39 688

08 687

1055

28 719

29 0

718

717

716

713

711

90 0

153

150

148

151

65 58

66 -6-1

[फा. सं . ओ-12016/ 2/ 2005- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 784.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of _section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited , Pump Station No. 7, P.O. Madarihat , Jalpaiguri District , Pin 735220(West Bengal) .

2177 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 ,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Police Station : Samuktala

State:West Benga!

District: Jalpaiguri

Old Plot No. New Plot No.

Name of the Village

Sr. No

Area Are

Hectare

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Sq.mtr.

8 1

412

20 UttarParokata

129

410

409

408

321

320

2317

127

1521

72 Chepani

1520

2311

1520

23165

2313

1519

2315-

1519

2312

1518

1506

2312

1506

2310

1507

2309

1505

2307

1503

2306

2305

1501

2290

1427

000014

어어

425

991

425

792

425

793

요

}

01 080

100

689

Kadampur

688

687

1055

719

718

717

716

713

711

90 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

2178

New Pict No.

Old Plot No.

Name of the Village

Hectare

Area Are

Sq.mtr. Sr No

Jurisdiction List No.

153

Pukhuria

150

148

151

[No. O-12016/2/ 2005-O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 785.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चकबोरती , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पंप स्टेशन नं 7 , डाक मदारीहाठ, जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिन 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला : जलपाईगुडी

पुलिस थाना कुमारग्राम

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

नया प्लाठ

पुराना प्लाट

संख्या

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

क्रम सं.

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

8 2

1367

378

पाकरीगुडी

378

1370

378

1371

378

1372

1375

378 2179 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14,1926

8 3

1353

368

1354

1355

368

1356

368

1357

368

1368

368.

1369

349

1303

348

1302

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/2/2005-ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 785. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam)to Siliguri ( West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority, Numaligarh- Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited , Pump Station No. 7 , P.O. Madarihat , Jalpaiguri District , Pin 735220 (West Bengal ) .

SCHEDULE

Police Station : Kumargram

District : Jalpaiguri

State:West Bengal

Old Plot New Plot

Nameof Village

Sr. No

No.

Area Are

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

8 1

378

Pakriguri

1367

378

1370

378

1371

378

1372

378

1375

565 GI /05-24 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

2180

368

349

348

[PSAT II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

8 5

1353-

1354

1355

54 0

1356

1357

1368

1369

23 1303

02 0

1302

[No. O - 12016/2/ 2005- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 786.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि बूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि से जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के बीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चकबोरती, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , बूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड , पंप स्टेशन नं 7 , डाक मदारीहाठ, जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिब 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला : जलपाईगुडी

कालचीनी

पुलिस यामा:

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

पुराना. प्लाठ

संख्या

क्रम सं .

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

661

687

मालंगी चाय बगान परमलगी

11 नया प्लाट संख्या

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर

661

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/2/2005- ओएनजी- डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव 2181 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

NewDelhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 786.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority , Numaligarh - Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project, Oil India Limited, Pump Station No. 7 , P.O. Madarihat , Jalpaiguri District, Pin 735220(West Bengal) .

SCHEDULE

Police Station : Kalchini

State:West Bengal

District:Jalpaiguri

Jurisdiction List

New Plot No.

NameofVillage

Area Are

Hectare

No.

Old Plot No.

Sq.mtr .

Sr. No

661

1 Malangi TeaGarden

687

Parmalangi

[No. O -12016/2/2005-O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 787.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2182

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1920

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चकबोरती , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जुनालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पंप स्टेशन नं 7 , डाक मदारीहाठ, जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिन 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल पुलिस थाना मदारीहाठ

जिला: जलपाईगुडी

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

पुराना प्लाठ

नया प्लाठ

क्रम सं.

संख्या

संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

पश्चिम खैर बाडी

305

178

181

1523

1524

181

180

1522

180

1655

179

68 2

उत्तर रंगाली बाजना

969

1885

969

968

1884

981

1891

981

1890

982

987

25 3

000

मध्य रंगाली बाजना

182

399

400

182

183

1603

183

1602

184

1604

184

134

1605

186

60 4

चापागुडी

579

571

579

572

579

563

568

579

577

567

577

569

381

565

581

577

568

581

578

564

576

570

}

576

573 2183

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( 11 ) ]

राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला: जलपाईबुही

पुलिस थाना: मदारीहाठ

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

पुराना प्लाठ

संख्या

क्रम सं.

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

4 1

582

583

575

220

उत्तर शिशुबाडी

220

222

225

226

227

233 नया प्लाठ संख्या

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर

8 578

558

566

555 }

579

574

639

638

220

222

225

226

227

233

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/2/2005- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 787. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited, Pump Station No. 7 , P.O. Madarihat, Jalpaiguri District , Pin 735220 (West Bengal) .

2184

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Police Station : Madarihat

State:West Bengal

District: Jalpaiguri

Old Plot No. New Plot No.

NameofVillage

Sr No

Hectare

Area Are

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Sq.mtr.

70 1

305

Paschim Khairbari

178

181

1523

181

1524

181

180

1522

1655

180

179

969

989

Uttar Rangali Bazna

}

1885

969

968

1884

968

981

1891

981

1890

982

987

000

399

182

3 Madhya Rangali Bazna

182

400

183

1603

183

1602

183

184

1604

184

1605

184

186

571

579

Chapaguri

579

572

579

563

568

578

577

567

577

569

365

577

58:

581

568

5114

570

576

573

552

578

558

552

566

582

566

583

555

583

573

574

575 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2185

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

Police Station : Madarihat

District: Jalpaiguri

State:West Bengal

OldPlot No.

NameofVillage

New Plot No.

Sr. No

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr. 1

8 5

Uttar Sishubari

220

639

220

638

220

222

225

226

227

233

[No.O -12016/2/2005-O.N.G./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2005

का. आ. 788.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि बूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चकबोरती, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , बूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पंप स्टेशन नं 7 , डाक मदारीहाठ, जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिन 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 2186

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

अनुसूची थाना बागराकाठा

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला : जलपाईगुडी

गाँद का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

पुराना प्लाठ

संख्या

क्रम सं.

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या 1

ग्रास्रमोड चाय बगान

253

261

260

259

252

192

257

234

247 भगतपुर चाय बगान

239

479

नागराकाठा

258

259

242

241

240

203 नया प्लाठ संख्या

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर

e 0

27 253

261

85 0

260

35 259

35 252

192

257

58 0

234

62 39

552

49 G

587

591

592

593

594

595

596

597

598

599

09 600

601

602

603

604

605

606

607

609

615

561

562

25 0

563

07 258

259

76 242

70 0

86 241

240

68 203

25 2187

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

बाना : नागराकान

राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला : जलपाईगुडी

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

नया प्लाठ संख्या

वर्ग मीटर

संख्या

पुराना प्लाठ

क्रम सं.

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

4 1

नागराकाठा

202

201

200

196

195

194

190

193

191

192

लुकसान चाय बगान

487 हेक्टेयर एयर

8 202

201

74 0

99 200

196

90 0

81 195

194

03 190

193

64 0

191

05 192

25 487

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/2/2005- ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 788. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority , Numaligarh- Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited , Pump Station No. 7, P.O. Madarihat , Jalpaiguri District , Pin 735220 (West Bengal ).

565 GI /05-25 2188

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( i) ]

SCHEDULE

State:WestBengal Police Station : Nagrakata

District : Jalpaiguri

Old Plot

Jurisdiction

New Plot No.

NameofVillage

Sr. No

Area Are

Hectare

ListNo.

No.

Sq.mtr.

8 1

253

1 Grassmore Tea Garden

261

260

259

252

192

257

234

235

552

247

2 Bhagatpur Tea Garden

587

239/242

591

239/242

592

239/242

593

239/242

594

239/242

595

239/242

596

239/242

597

239/242

598

239/242

599

239/242

600

239/242

601

239/242

602

239/242

603

239/242

604

239/242

605

239/242

606

239/242

607

239/242

609

239/242

615

239/242

258

3 Nagrakata

259

242

241

240

203

202

201

201 2189 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

New Plot No.

Name ofVillage

Area Are

Hectare

Sr. No

Old Plot No.

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Sq.mtr.

8 1

200

Nagrakata

196

195

194

190

193

191

192

487

13 4 Luksan Tea Garden

[No. O -12016/2/2005-O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 789.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीमद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चक्रबोरती, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पंप स्टेशन नं 7 , डाक मदारीहाठ, जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिन 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 2190

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

अनुसूची

जिला: जलपाईगुडी

पुलिस थाना : माल-

गाँव का नाम

पुराना प्लाठ

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या क्रम सं.

4 1

159 1

ठुनबाडी चाय बगान

159

159 2

108 हाय हाय पाथार चाय बगान

105

102

101

361

362

367

368

370

360

369

356

359

498

497

PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] .

राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल

वर्ग मीटर नया प्लाठ संख्या

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर एयर

8 322

323

38 325

326

328

73 387

83 214

44 206

201

25 93

30 522

523

07 520

00 528

506

}

529

28 370

33 519

370

60 63

967

65 510

512

511

47 506

507

512

56 514

512

506

509

89 507

512 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2191

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

पुलिस थाना: माल-

जिला: जलपाईगुडी

गाँव का नाम

पुराना प्लाठ क्रम सं.

राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर नया प्लाठ संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर

अधिकारिता

सूचि संख्या

नितु ग्लेन्को चाय बगान

7 3

निडु ग्लेन्को चाय बगान

133

115

118

116

1088 रांगामाठी चाय बगान

40 पाश्चम डामडीम

851

6 उदलाबाडी

851

8 5

23/155

68 23/156

23/157

23/158

6/135

84 6/136

6/137

7/138

7/139

41 7/140

7/189

43 9/142

9/143

9/144

67 3

118/113

115

38 118/180

01 118/182

118/183

118

116/175

116/176

116/177

11 116/178

116/179

116

987

49 40/105

0 04

000

82 37

44 4

88 25

27 1432

1433

1434 2192

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल पुलिस थाना माल-

जिला : जलपाईगुडी

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

पुरामा प्लाठ

नया प्लाठ संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर क्रम सं.

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

850

1427

850

1428

850

1431

706

1144

660

679

7 रानीचेरा चाय बगान

660

680

660

681

117

8 उत्तर फुलबाडी

118

107

105

100

101

103

678

657

9 बागराकोठा चाय बगान

676

655

675

654

674

653

652

673

650

671

625

644

648

670

668

660

665

646

666

647

663

644

645

664

643

662

646

627

200

198

201

199

236

203

317

461

10 मानाबाडी चाय बगान

317

462

310

11 कलागाइती

311

241

292

12 वाशाबाडी चाय बगान

240

291

290

239

270

233

232

269

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/2/2005 - ओएनजी-डीओ- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव 2193 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 789.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal), a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule arinexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority, Numaligarh -Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited, Pump Station No. 7 , P.O. Madarihat , Jalpaiguri District , Pin 735220 (West Bengal) .

SCHEDULE

State:West Bengal Police Station : Mal

District:Jalpaiguri

OldPlot

Jurisdiction

New Plot No.

Nameof Village

Area Are

Hectare

Sr. No

No.

Sq.mtr .

ListNo.

159

322

Tunbari Tea Garden

159

323

159

325

159

326

159

328

387

108

2. Hai Hai Pathar Tea Ga

105

214

102

206

101

201

361

522

361

523

362

520

367

528

367

506

368

529

370

360

88 00 00

519

369

370

369-

369

967

369 2194

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14. 1926

PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

OldPlot

Area

New Plot No.

NameofVillage

Sr. No

Are

No.

Hectare

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Sq.mtr. 1

356

510

356

512

359

511

359

506

359

507

359

512

498

514

498

512

497

506

497

509

497

507

497

512

NewGlenco Tea Garde

23/155

23/156

23/157

23/158

6/135

6/136

6/137

7/138

7/139

7/140

7/189

9/142

9/143

9/144

133

118/113

115

118

118/180

118

118/182

118

118/183

118

116

116/175

116

116/176

116

116/177

116

116/178

116

116/179

116

1088

987

Rangamati Tea Garden

5 Paschim Dam Dim

105

1 2195

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Plot No.

Nameof Village

Sr. No

Area Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Old Plot No.

8 1

Odlabari

851

1432

851

1433

851

1434

1427

850

1428

850

1431

706

1144

660

679

Rani Chera Tea Garden

660

680

681

660

117

8 UttarPhulbari

118

107

105

100

101

103

657

678

67 9 Bagrakote Tea Garden

655

676

675

654

653

674

652

673

671

650

625

644

648

670

668

660

646

665

647

666

644

663

645

664

643

662

627

646

198

200

201

199

203

236

317

461

10 Manabari Tea Garden

317

462

310

11 Kalagaity

311

241

292

62 12 Washabari Tea Garder

240

291

239

290

270

233

269

232

[No. O-12016/2/2005-O.N.G ./D.O. - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

565 G1 /05-26 2196

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 790. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि बूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जब किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जब के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चक्रबोरती , सक्षम प्राधिकारी, बूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पंप स्टेशन नं 7 , हाक : मदारीहाठ, जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिन 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला: जलपाईगुडी

पुलिस थाना : मटेली-

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर

नया प्लाठ संख्या

पुराना प्लाठ

एयर

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

क्रम सं.

323

चालसा महाबाडी

403

555

सातकाया चाय बगान

402

554

401

553

400

552

394

321

393

320

381

316

392

316

391

311

143

137

146

137

144

138

147

138

132

125

131

126

130

124 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

2197

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

पुलिस थाना मठेली-

राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला : जलपाईगुडी

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.

पुराना प्लाठ

नया प्लाठ संख्या

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

122

128

121

126

120

119

111

112

110

111

99 3

सोनगाछी चाय बगान

570

637

240

292

291

239

290

289

235

287

288

234

285

2865

233

300

230

283

284

231

229

281

282

226

276

228

278

279

227

277

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/2/2005- ओएनजी-डीओ-IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2005

S. O. 790.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

2198

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SFC 3 ( ii ) ] Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority, Numaligarh-Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited , Pump Station No. 7 , P.O. Madarihat , Jalpaiguri District , Pin 735220 ( West Bengal ) .

SCHEDULE

Police Station : Mateli

District: Jalpaiguri

State: West Bengal NameofVillage

New Plot No.

Sr. No

Jurisdiction List No.

OldPlot No.

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr. 1

8 1

Chalsa Mahabari

323

55 2

403

Sathkaya Tea Garden

555

402

554

401

553

400

552

321

394

320

393

316

381

316

392

311

391

137

143

137

146 }

138

144

138

147

125

132

126

131

124

130

122

128

121

126

120

119

111

112

110

111

99 3

Songachhi Tea Garden

570

637

240

292

291

239

290

289

235

287 288

234

285 286

233

300

230

283

284 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2199 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

NameofVillage

New Plot No.

Sr. No

Jurisdiction ListNo.

OldPlot No.

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr .

8 3

Songachhi Tea Garden

231

229

281

282

226

276

228

278

279

227

277

[No. O -12016/ 2/ 2005- O.N.G ./D.O. - IV] N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2005

का. आ. 791.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि नूमालीगद (असम) से शिलिगुरी (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री परितोष चक्रबोरती, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , नूमालीगद शिलिगुरी पाइपलाईन प्रसारण परियोजना , आयॅल इंडिया लिमिटेड, पंप स्टेशन नं 7 , डाक मदारीहाठ, जिला जलपाईगुडी, पिन 735220. ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

पुलिस थाना बीरपाडा

जिला: जलपाईगुडी

राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

नया प्लाठ संख्या

पुराना प्लाठ

संख्या

क्रम सं.

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वर्ग मीटर 1

8 9

1 बीरपाडा चाय बगान

647

646

637

636

634

633

11 2200

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5. 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

PART 11- S . 3 (ii) ] पुलिस थाना बीरपाडा

राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल

जिला: जलपाईगुडी

गाँव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल

पुराना प्लाठ

संख्या

नया प्लाठ संख्या

क्रम सं.

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

638

641

640

639

627

735

642

717

718

733

714

702

703

704

705

701

871

872

877

873

874

875

870

852

420

418

419

417

411

383

382

356

365

354

302

2 डांगापाडा

302

306

304

303

176

271

270

163

340

218

215

214

144

145

147

153

152

342

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/2/2005- ओएनजी- डीओ- IV]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव 2201 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/ फाल्गुन 14,1926

New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2005

S. O. 791.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Numaligarh (Assam) to Siliguri (West Bengal ) , a pipeline should be laid by Oil India Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Paritosh Chakraborthy, Competent Authority , Numaligarh- Siliguri Pipeline Expansion Project , Oil India Limited , Pump Station No. 7 , P.O. Madarihat , Jalpaiguri District , Pin 735220 (West Bengal) .

SCHEDULE

State:West Bengal

District: Jalpaiguri

PoliceStation :Birpara

New Plot No.

Old Plot No.

NameofVillage

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Sr. No

647

1 Birpara Tea Garden

646

637

636

634

633

638

641

640

639

627

735

642

642 2202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

Old Plot No. New Plot No.

NameofVillage

Sr. No

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

717

718

733

714

702

703

704

705

701

871

872

877

873

874

875

870

852

420

418

419

417

411

383

382

356

365

354

302

Dangapara

306

304

303

176

271

270

163

340

218

215

214

144

145

147

153

152

342

[No. O -12016/2/ 2005-O.N.G ./D.O. -IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP , Under Secу.

2203

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 792.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( i) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) तारीख 10 जनवरी , 2004 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 59 तारीख 24 दिसम्बर, 2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेप की भूमि में जिसका माप 1444.800 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 3570.10 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है, कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ,

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्य हैं : -

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित भूमि का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती हैः-

(क) इससे उपाबंध अनुसूची "क " में वर्णित 5.30 हेक्टर (लगभग) या 13.09 एकड़ ( लगभग) माप वाली भूमिः

( ख ) इससे उपाबंध अनुसूची " ख " में वर्णित 543.35 हेक्टर (लगभग ) या 1342.61 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि में खनिजों के खनन, खदान , बोर करने , उनकी खुदाई और तलाश करने , उन्हें प्राप्त करने , उन पर कार्य करने और उन्हें ले जाने के अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है । टिप्पण1. इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आनेवाले के रेखांक संख्याः एस.ई.सी.एल. / बी.एस.पी. / जी.एम. ( पी.एल.जी)/लैंडः 293 तारीख 22 सितम्बर, 2004 निरीक्षण कलेक्टर, सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक 1 , कांउसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कलकत्ता 700001 के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर-495006 (छत्तीसगढ़) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है,

टिप्पण 2 उपरोक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है, जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध है -

565 G1/05-27 2204

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] अर्जन के प्रति आक्षेपः-

8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति की किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्ही अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरणः- इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नही मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वंय खनन संक्रियाए करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाए केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नही करनी चाहिए ।

( 2) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम प्राधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच , यदि कोई हो, जो वह आवश्यक समझता है करने के पश्चात् वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के सम्बन्ध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकडों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तयों पर अपनी सिफारिशें और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

( 3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्व समझा जाएगा जो अधिकार में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता यदि भूमि का किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते है ।

टिप्पण 3 : - केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट कलकत्ता - 700001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II खंड 3, उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 4 अप्रैल 1987 के पृष्ठ 1397 से 1400 पर प्रकाशित अधिसूचना का ० आ0 सं 0 905 , तारीख 20 मार्च 1987 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

सभी अधिकार

ग्राम का नाम

2205

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

अनुसूची " क"

केतकी अडंर ग्राउंड प्रोजेक्ट, विश्रामपुर क्षेत्र

जिला - सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

तहसील

क्रमाक संख्या

ग्राम संख्या

पटवारी हल्का संख्या 01 जोबगा

275

45 जिला

टिप्पण

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

भाग

5.30

सूरजपुर

योगः- 5.30 हेक्टर

सरगुजा

( लगभग)

या 18.09 एकड़ ( लगभग) ग्राम जोबगा ( भाग) में अर्जित किए जानेवाले प्लाट संख्यांकः 969 से 982, और 987 ( भाग) सीमा वर्णन

क-ख

रेखा ग्राम में बिन्दु " क " से प्रारंभ होती है और संख्या 969 , 970 , 971 , 972 , 975 , 976, 977, 978, 987 की उत्तरी सीमा से होती हुई 66 बिन्दु " ख" पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग

रेखा प्लाट संख्या 987 से और प्लाट संख्या 982 , 981 , की पूर्वी सीमा से होते हुई बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है ।

ग-घ

रेखा प्लाट संख्या 974 की दक्षिणी सीमा से होते हुई बिन्दु " घ" पर मिलती है ।

घ -क

रेखा प्लाट संख्या 974 और 969 की पश्चिमी सीमा से होते हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

खनन अधिकार

अनुसूची " ख"

टिप्पण तहसील

का ग्राम संख्या

ग्राम नाम

क्रमाक संख्या

पटवारी हल्का संख्या

275

जोबगा

जिला क्षेत्र (हेक्टर में)

भाग

190.65

सरगुजा

सूरजपुर

केतका

भाग

64.45

सरगुजा

सूरजपुर

400

छा

भाग

138.88

सरगुजा

सूरजपुर

हेक्टर

योगः- 393.98 2206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14. 1926

[ PART II-Sh . 3 ( ii) ] वन भूमि

कम्पार्टमेन्ट नबंर रेंज डिवीजन

टिप्पण

(हेक्टर

क्रमाक संख्या

क्षेत्र में)

135

149.37

भाग

सूरजपुर

सरगुजा दक्षिणी

योगः- 149.37 हेक्टर कुल योगः- 393.98 + 149.37 = 543.35 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1342.61 एकड़ ( लगभग)

( 1 ) ग्राम जोबगा ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांकः-

140 ( भाग ) , 141 ( भाग ) , 145 ( भाग ) , 146 ( भाग ) , 147, 148 , 149(भाग ) , 150 से 153,154 (भाग ) , 155 ( भाग ) , 156( भाग ) , 157 ( भाग ) , 194 ( भाग ) , 195 , 196 ( भाग ) , 197 ( भाग ) , 19 8,199,200 ( भाग ) , 201 ( भाग ) , 20 ( भाग ) , 204 ( भाग ) , 205 ( भाग ) 206 ( भाग ) , 207 से 21 6,217 ( भाग ) , 218 ( भाग ) , 219 ( भाग ) , 220 ( भाग ) , 228 ( भाग ) , 230 ( भाग ) , 231 से 235 , 236 ( भाग ) , 237 ( भाग ) , 238 से 416,417 ( भाग ) , 418 से 434,435 ( भाग ) , 437 ( भाग ) , 43 8,439 ( भाग ) ,491 ( भाग ) , 492 ( भाग ) , 493 से 594,595 (भाग) , 596 ( भाग ) , 597 ( भाग ) , 598 ( भाग ) , 599,600,601 ( भाग ) , 606 ( भाग ) , 607,608 ( भाग) , 641 ( भाग ) , 642 ( भाग ) , 644भाग) , 710 ( भाग) , 712 ( भाग ) , 713 ( भाग ) , 714से 718,719 ( भाग ) , 720 से 723,72 4 ( भाग ) , 725 से 830,831 ( भाग ) , 841 ( भाग ) , 842 ( भाग) , 843,844,845 ( भाग ) , 846 ( भाग ) , 847से 894,895 ( भाग ] , 896,897,898 [ भाग ] , 902 [ भाग ] , 903 [ भाग ] , 905 [भाग] , 906 [ भाग ] , 907 [ भाग ] , 909 [ भाग ] , 910 [ भाग ] , 915 [ भाग ] , 916 [ भाग ] , 917 [ भाग ] , 918 [ भाग ] , 919,920 [ भाग ] , 927 [ भाग] , 928,929,930 [ भाग ] , 931 [ भाग ] , 932 ( भाग ] , और 1021 [ भाग ] .

(2 ) ग्राम केतका ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांकः-

1129( भाग) 1131 ( भाग) , 1132 ( भाग) . 1134( भाग ) , 1136( भाग) , 1137,1138( भाग) ] , 1139 ( भाग) 1140से 1143,1144 [ भाग ] 1145 [ भाग ] , 1148 [ भाग] 1149[ भाग ] . 1150 से 1159.1160 भाग ] . 1161 से 1165,1166 [भाग ] 1198 [ भाग ] , 1199 , [भाग ] , 1200 [ भाग ] , 1201 से 1203,1204 [भाग ] , 12 05से 1211,1212 [ भाग ] . 1213 [ भाग ] . 1255[ भाग ] , 1257[ भाग ] , 1258[ भाग ] . 1259 [ भाग ] , 1260 से 1295.1296[ भाग] 1297| भाग ] 1298 [ भाग ] , 1299 [ भाग ] , 1300to1305,1306[ भाग] , 1323 [भाग ] 1491 भाग ] 1492 { भाग ] 1493 भाग ] .1494 भाग ] , 1495 [ भाग) , 1496 ( भाग ) , 1497,1498 [ भाग ) 1499 से 1537,1538[ भाग ] . 1539[ भाग ] 1540,1541,1542[ भाग ] , 1543,1544[ भाग ] 1547 [ भाग ] और 1572 [ भाग ] .

2207 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/ फाल्गुन 14,1926

(3) ग्राम लाछा ( भाग) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांकः-

370[ भाग) .371 [ भाग ] 380[ भाग] . 381 [ भाग] ,451 [ भाग ] ,484[ भाग ] , 485 भाग ] ,486 [ भाग ] , 490 [ भाग ] 491 [ भाग ] ,492to497,498 [ भाग ] , 501 [ भाग ] ,528[ भाग] , 529( भाग ), 533 से 537,538 [ भाग ] .552[ भाग ] 553to555,556 [ भाग ] ,557[ भाग] , 558 से 571,572 [ भाग ] .573 [ भाग ] ,574 [ भाग ] , 575 [ भाग ] .588 [ भाग ] , 589 भाग ] ,590 से 643,645 [ भाग ] , 646से 753,754 [ भाग] ,757[ भाग ] . 758 [भाग] . 759,760,761 [ भाग ] , 762,763,764 [ भाग ] , 765 [ भाग ] , 766 से 768.769 [भाग ] .770 [ भाग ] , 771 [ भाग ] .781 [भाग ] .782 [ भाग ] , 783 से 795,796 [भाग ] , 797[ भाग ] , 798 से , 800,80 1 [ भाग ] , 802 [ भाग ] , 806 [ भाग ] 807से 832,833 [ भाग ] , 835 [ भाग ] , 836 से 838,839 [भाग ] , 840 [ भाग ] , 841 [ भाग ] , 842 [ भाग ] .844 [ भाग ] .845.846 [भाग ] .847 [ भाग] , 848 [ भाग ] , 849,850 [भाग ] , 851 [ भाग ] , 855 [ भाग ] , 876 [ भाग ] .877से 884.885 [ भाग ] .886 [ भाग ] , 890 ( भाग) , 891 से 895,896 [ भाग ] .897 [ भाग ].898 [ भाग ] .899 [भाग ] 9001 से 908.909 [ भाग ] .910 [ भाग] . 911 [ भाग ] , 912 [ भाग ] , 918 [ भाग ] .919 से923,924 [ भाग ] , 925 [ भाग ] ,944 [ भाग ] . 948 [ भाग] .949,950 [ भाग ] .951 [भाग ] ,952[भाग ] ,और975 [Part] .

1. आरक्षित वन में अर्जित किए जानेवाले कम्पार्टमेन्ट संख्याः 135 (भाग) .

सीमा वर्णन

क-घ रेखा ग्राम जोबगा में बिन्दु " क" से आरंभ होती है और प्लाट संख्या 969, 974 और आरक्षित वन की सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " घ" पर मिलती है ।

घ- घ1- रेखा आरक्षित वन कम्पार्टमैन्ट संख्या संख्यस 135 से होती हुई ग्राम ड- च- लाछा में से प्रवेश करती है और प्लाट संख्या 924 , 925 , 918 , 909 , छज 910 , 911 , 912, 899 , 896 , 897, 898 , 944, 948 , 952 , 951 , 950 , 975 , 370 से होती हुई बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है ।

ज-ज1- रेखा ग्राम लाछा के प्लाट संख्या 370 , 371 , 380, 381 , 975 , 890 , ज2 -ज 3 886, 885, 876, और प्लाट संख्या 907, 855 की पश्चिमी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु पर " ज3 " पर मिलती है ।

ज3 -ज4- ज5-ज6 रेखा ग्राम लाछा के प्लाट संख्या 855 , 851 , 850 , 848 , 847 , 846 , 844, 842, 841 , 840 , 839 , 835 , 833 , 806 , 796, 797,801 , 802 , 782 , 781 , 754 , 757 , 758 , 761 , 764,, 765 , 771 से होती हुई बिन्दु " ज 6 " पर मिलती है । 2208

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5. 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

PART II-SEC . 3 ( 11 )] ज6 -ज7- रेखा ग्राम लाछा के प्लाट संख्या 771 , 770 , 769 , 451 , 645 से प्लाट ज8

संख्या 643 , 492 की दक्षिणी सीमा प्लाट संख्या 491 , 490 , 486,485, 484 से होती हुई बिन्दु " ज 8 " पर मिलती है ।

ज 8-ज9-

ज10-झ

रेखा ग्राम लाछा के प्लाट संख्या 484 , 498 , 501 , 589 , 588 , 575 , 574 , 573 , 572, 528 , 529 से , प्लाट संख्या 533 की पश्चिमी सीमा बाद में प्लाट संख्या 538 , 552, 556, 557 से होते हुई ग्राम केतका में प्रवेश करती है और प्लाट 1139 , 1138 , 1136, 1134 से होती हुई बिन्दु " झ " पर मिलती है ।

झ-ञ-

ट-ठ

रेखा ग्राम केतका के प्लाट संख्या 1134 , 1132, 1131 , 1129 , 1144, 1145, 1149 , 1148 , 1160 , 1166 , 1198 , 1199 , 1200 , 1204 , 1212, 1213 , 1259 , 1258 , 1257 , 1255 , 1296 , 1297, 1298 , 1299 , 1306 , 1323 , 1496 , 1495 , 1494, 1493, 1492 , 1498 , 1491 , 1544 , 1542 , 1547 , 1539 , 1538 , 1572 से होती हुई ग्राम जोबगा में प्रवेश करती है और प्लाट संख्या 237, 236, 230 , 228 , 217 , 218 , 219 220 , 206 , 205 , 204 , 202 , 201 , 200 , 197, 196, 194, 417 से होती हुई बिन्दु " ठ " पर मिलती है ।

ठ-ड- ढ

रेखा ग्राम जोबगा के प्लाट संख्या 417 , 157 , 156 , 154 , 155 , 149 , 145, 146, 141 , 140 से होती हुई बिन्दु " ढ " पर मिलती है ।

ढ-ण

रेखा ग्राम जोबगा के प्लाट संख्या 140 , 435, 437, 439, 492, 491 , त-थ

595 , 596 , 597, 598 , 601 , 606, 608 , 641 , 642 , 719, 644 , 719 , 713 , 712 , 724 , 710 , 831 , 841 , 842, 1021 , 845 , 846 , 1021 , 920 , 927 , 930, 932 से होती हुई बिन्दु " थ " पर मिलती है । थ-थ 1 -द रेखा ग्राम जोबगा के प्लाट संख्या 932 , 931 , 930 , 917 , 918 , 916 ध- न-क 915 , 910 , 909 , 907, 906 , 905 , 903, 902, 895, 898 से होते हुई आरक्षित वन में प्रवेश करती है और कम्पार्टमेन्ट नंबर 135 से होती हुई आरभिंक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/9/2003-पी. आर.आई.डब्ल्यू. ]

बी. के. पण्डा, निदेशक [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2209 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

Ministry of Coal

New Delhi , the 24th February, 2005

S. O. 792.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal , number S.O. 59 dated the 24th December , 2003 under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India in part - II , Section 3 , sub- section ( ii ) dated 10th January , 2004 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in lands measuring 1444.800 hectares ( approximately ) or 3570.10 acres (approximately) in the locality specified approved thereto as also in the Schedule hereto annexed to that notification;

And , whereas , the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said land;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the sub- section ( 1 ) of section 7 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the following lands : -

(a) The lands measuring 5.30 hectares ( approximately) or 13.09 acres (approximately) described in Schedule 'A ' appended hereto ;

(b) The rights to mine , quarry , bore , dig and search for , win , work and carry away minerals in the lands measuring 543.35 hectares (approximately ) or 1342.61 acres ( approximately ) described in the schedule 'B ' appended hereto ;

Note 1- The plan bearing No : SECL/ BSP/ GM ( Plg) / Land / 293 dated the 22nd September , 2004 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector , Surguja ( Chhattisgarh ) or in the Office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Calcutta 700 001 or in the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Section) , Seepat Road , Bilaspur- 495 006 ( Chhattisgarh )

Note 2- Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the above said Act , which provides as follows : -

Objection to Acquisition .

"8 ( 1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 (i ) has been issued may , within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land .

Explanation: - Itshall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person .

2210

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (2) Every objection under sub - section ( 1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing , and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry , if any , as he thinks necessary , either makes a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land , or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land , to the Central Government , containing his recommendation on the objections together with the record of the proceedings held by him , for the decision of that Government .

(3) For the purpose of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act .

Note: 3 The Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata 700001 has been appointed by the Central Government , as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act , vide notification under S.O 905 , dated the 20th March , 1987 , published in Part - II , Section 3 sub - section ( ii ) of the gazette of India , dated the 4th April , 1987 at pages 1397 to 1400 . ,

Schedule ' A'

Ketki under Ground Project , Bisrampur Area District -Surguja ( Chhattisgarh)

All Rights

Remarks

District

Tahsil

Area in hectares village number

Serial Number

halka Patwari number

Name of village

Part

275

Surguja 5.30

Jobga

Surajpur

Total : 5.30 hectares ( approximately ) or 13.09 acres ( approximately) 1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Jobga ( Part ) :

969 to 982 and 987 ( part) .

Boundary Description

A- B Line starts in village Jobga from point "A " and passes along the Northern boundary of plot numbers 969 , 970 , 971 , 972 , 975 , 976 , 977 , 978 , 987 and meets at point " B " [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2211

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

B - C Line passes through plot number 987 then passes along the Eastern boundary of plot numbers 982,981and meets at point " C" ,

C - D Line passes along the Southern boundary of plot number 974 and meets at point " D " ,

D - A Line passes along the Western boundary of plot number 974 and 969 and meets at the starting point " A"

Schedule 'B'

Ketki under Ground Project , Bisrampur Area District -Surguja ( Chhattisgarh)

Mining Rights

Serial number

Village number

Tahsil

Remarks District Area in hectares

Patwari

halka

number

Name of village

45 1

275

Jobga

Part

Surajpur

45 Ketka 61

Surguja 190.65

Part Surguja 64.45

Surajpur

400

Lachha

Surguja 138.88 Part Surajpur

Forest land

Range Compartment number

Serial number

135

Surajpur

Total: 393.98 hectares

Remarks Division

Area in hectares

Part

149.37

South Surguja

Total : 149.37 hectares Grant total: 393.98 + 149.37 = 543.35hectares ( approximately ) or 1342.61 Acres ( approximately )

1. plot numbers to be acquired in village Jobga ( Part) : -

140 ( Part ) , 141 ( Part) , 145 ( Part) , 146 ( Part) , 147 , 148 , 149 (Part) , 150to153 , 154 (Part ) , 155 ( Part ) , 156 ( Part ) , 157 ( Part) , 194 ( Part) , 195 , 196 ( Part) , 197 ( Part ) , 198,19 9,200( Part ) , 201 ( Part ) , 202 ( Part ) , 204 ( Part ) , 205 ( Part ) , 206 ( Part ) , 207to216,217 ( Part ) , 218 ( Part ) , 219 ( Part ) .220 ( Part ) , 228 ( Part ) , 230 ( Part ) , 231to235,236 ( Part ) , 237 ( Part ) , 238to416,41 7(Part ) ,418to434,435 ( Part ) , 437 ( Part ) , 438,439 (Part ) , 491 ( Part ) ,492 ( Part ) ,493to594,595 ( Part ) , 596 ( Part ) , 597 ( Part ) , 598 ( Part ) , 599,600,601 ( Part ) , 606 ( Part) , 607,608 (Part) , 641 ( part) , 642 ( Part) , 644 ( part) , 710 ( Part ) , 712 ( Part) , 713 ( Part) , 714to71 8,719 ( Part) , 720to723,724 ( Part ) , 725to830,831 ( Part ) , 841 ( Part) , 842 ( Part ) , 8 43,844,845 ( Part ) , 846 ( Part ) , 847to894,895 ( Part ] , 896,897,898 [ Part ] , 902 [ Part ] , 903 [ Part ] , 905 [ Part ] , 906 [ Part ] , 907 [ Part ] , 909 [ Part ] , 910 [ Part ] , 915 [ Part 1,916 [ Part ] , 917 [ Part ] , 918 [ Part] , 919,920 [ Part] , 927 [ Part ] , 928,929,930 [ Part ] , 931 [ Part ] , 932 ( Part ) , and1021 [ Part] .

565 G1 /05-28 2212

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Ketka [ Part] : -

1129 [ Part ] , 1131 [ Part ] , 1132 [ Part ) , 1134 [ Part ] , 1136 [ Part] , 1137,1138 [ Part ] , 1139 [ Part ] , 1140to1143,1144 [ Part ] , 1145[ Part ] , 1148[ Part] , 1149 [ Part ] , 1150 to1159,1160 [ Part ] , 1161to1165,1166 [ Part ] , 1198 [ Part] , 1199 [ Part ] , 1200 [ Part ] , 1201to1203,1204 [ Pärt ] , 1205to1211 , 1212 [ Part ] , 1213 [ Part ] , 1255 [ Part ] , 1257[ Part ] , 1258 [ Part] , 1259 [ Part ] , 1260to1295 , 1296 [ Part ] , 1297 [ Part ] , 1298 [ Part ] , 1299 [ Part ] , 1300to1305,1306 [ Part ] , 1323 [ Part ] , 1491 [ Part] , 1492 { Part ] , 1493 [ Part ] , 1494 [ Part ] , 1495 [ Part ) , 1496 ( Part ) , 1497,1498 [ Part [ , 1499to 1537,1538[ Part ] , 1539 [ Part ] , 1540,1541,1542 [ Part ] , 1543,1544 [ Part ] , 1547 [ Part] & 1572 [ Part ] .

2. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Lachha [ Part] : -

370 [ Part ) , 371 [ Part ] , 380 [ Part ] , 381 [ Part ] , 451 [ Part ] , 484 [ Part ] , 485 [ Par] , 486 [ P art ] , 490 [ Part ] , 491 [ Part ] , 492to497,498 [ Part ] , 501 [ Part ] , 528 [ Part ] , 529 ( Part ) , 533to537,538 [ Part ] , 552 [ Part ] , 553to555,556 [ Part ] , 557 [ Part ] , 558to571,52 [ Part ] , 573 [ Part ] , 574 [ Part ] , 575 [ Part ] , 588 [ Part] , 589 [ Part ] , 590to643,645 [ Part ] , 646to753,754 [ Part ] , 757 [ Part ] , 758 [ Part ] , 759,760,761 [ Part ] , 762,763,764 [ Part ] , 765[ Part ] , 766to768.769 [ Part ] , 770 [ Part ] , 771 [ Part ] , 781 [ Part ] , 782 [ Part ] , 783to795,796 [ Part ] , 797 [ Part] , 798to , 800,801 [ Part ] , 802 [ Part ] , 806 [ Part ] , 8 07to832,833 [ Part ] , 835 [ Part ] , 836to838,839 [ Part ] , 840 [ Part ] , 841 [ Part ] , 842 [ Part ) , 844 [ Part ] , 845,846 [ Part ] , 847 [ Part ] , 848 [ Part ] , 849,850 [ Part ] , 851 [ Part ] , 855 [ Part ] , 876 [ Part ] , 877to884,885 [ Part ] , 886 [ Part ] , 890 ( Part ) , 891to895 , 896[ Part ] , 897 [ Part ] , 898 [ Part ] , 899 [ Part] , 900to908,909 [ Part ] , 910 [ Part ] , 911 [ Part ] , 912 [ Part] , 918 [ Part ] , 919to923,924 [ Part] , 925 [ Part ] , 944 [ Part] , 948 [ Part ] , 949,950 [ Part] , 951 [ Part ] , 952 [ Part ] , & 975 [ Part ] .

4. Reserved Forest to be acquired : compartment Number: 135( Part) : -

Boundary Description

A-D

Line starts in village Jobga from point " A " and passes along common boundary of plot numbers 969,974 and Reserved Forest boundary and meets at point." D" .

D - D1 - E F-G -H

Line passes through Reserve Forest compartment no.135 and enter in village Lachha and passes through plot number 924,925,918,909,910,911,912,899,896,897,898,944,948 , 952,951,950,975,370 and meets at point " H" .

H -H1

H2-H3

Line passes in village Lachha through plot numbers 370,371 , 380,381,975,890,886,885 , 876 and partly western boundary of plot number 907,855 and meets at point "H3 " .

H3 -H4-

H5 -H6

Line passes in village Lachha through plot numbers 855 , 851,850,848,847,846,844,842,841,840,839,835,833 , 855 , 796,797,801,802,782,781,754,757,758,761,764,765.771 and meets at point " H6 " .

2213 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

H6 - H7- H8 Line passes in village Lachha through plot numbers 771,770,769,451,645 along southern boundary of plot numbers 643,492 , and passes through plot numbers 491,490,486,485 484 and meets at point " H8 " .

H8 - H9- H10 - I Line passes in village Lachha through plot numbers 484,498,501,589,588,575,574,573,572,528,529 , Western boundary of plot number 533 , then through plot number 538,552,556,557 and enter in village ketka and passes through plot numbers 1139,1138,1136,1134 and meets point " I" .

I -J - K- Line passes in village Ketka through plot numbers 1134,1132 , 1131,1129,1144, 1145,1149,1148,1160,1166 , 1198 , 1199,1200 , 1204 , 1212 , 1213,1259,1258,1257,1255 , 1296,1297,1298,1299,1306,1323,1496,1495,1494,1493 , 1492,1498,1491,1544,1542,1547,1539,1538,1572 and enter in village Jobga and passes through plot numbers 237,236,230,228,217,218,219,220,206,205,204,202,201 , 200,197,196,194,417 and meets at point " L" .

L- M - N Line passes in village Jobga through plot number 417,157 , 156,154,155,149 , 145, 146,141,140 and meets at point " N" .

N - Q- P -Q Line passes in village Jobga through plot numbers 140,435,437,439,492,491,595,596,597,598,601,606,608 , 641,642,719,644,719,713,712,724,710,831,841,842,1021 , 845,846,1021,920,927,930,932 and meets at point " Q " .

Q-QI - R

S- T-A Line passes in village Jobga through plot numbers 932,931,930,917,918,916,915,910,909,907,906,905,903 , 902,895,898 and enter in Reserve forest and passes through compartment number 135 and meets at starting point " A" .

[F. No. 43015/9/2003 - PRIW ]

B. K. PANDA , Director

नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 793.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन एवं विकास) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना, जो भारत के राजपत्र , भाग , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड (ii ) तारीख 26-04-2003 में प्रकाशित की गई थी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्राल की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का. आ. 1253 तारीख 21-04-2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में , जिसका माप 1463.433 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) है, कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी, 2214

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त भूमि मे कोयला अभिप्राप्त है ।

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन एवं विकास) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्याक का.आ. 237 , तारीख 22.1.2004 को अधिक्रमण करते हुए , उन बातों के सिवाय जो ऐसे अधिक्रमण से पहले की गई या करने से लोभ किया गया है , इससे उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वर्णित 1463.433 हेक्टर (लगभग ) माप की भूमि और उस पर के सभी अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती हैं ।

टिप्पण 1: इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. ई.सी.एल./ सी.एच यू.बी/ मौजा/08 तारीख 27.10.2004 का उप आयुक्त, जिला गोड्डा एवं पाकुड़ ( झारखण्ड) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता 700001 के कार्यालय में या निदेशक तकनीकी (संचालन) , ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, संकटोरिया , डाकघर दिसेरगढ़ , जिला बर्दमान (प . बगांल) पिन कोड सं0 713333 के कार्यालय में निरीक्षण किया जा सकता है ।

टिप्पण 2: कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 8 के उपबन्धों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमे निम्नलिखित उपवन्ध हैः ---

" 8 अर्जन के प्रति आक्षेप : -

( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी वाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है, हितबद्ध है . अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्ही अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आक्षेप कर सकेगा । स्पष्टीकरण : - इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नही मानी जायेगी कि कोई व्याक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिये स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

( 2) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जायेगी और सक्षम अधिकारी आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या बिधि व्यबसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी मभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच, यदि कोई हो, करने के पश्चात् जां वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ो या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2215

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/ फाल्गुन 14,1926

की गई कार्याबाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट कन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके बिनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

( 3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितवद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता, यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं अ टिप्पण 3: केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता - 700001 को अधिनियम के अधीन अधिसूचना सं० का.आ. 2520 तारीख 11 जून, 1983 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

अनुसूची

ब्लक 1 एवं 2

चुपरबीटा ब्लाक ( राजमहल कोलफील्डस् )

ब्लाक

थाना क्रम सं०

थाना सं०

मौजा/ग्राम का नाम

8 प्रथम

चोटा पुरो सं

सुन्दर पहाड़ी 2

गरीडीह सं

सुन्दर पाहाड़ी 3

पीपर जोरीया सं

सुन्दर पाहाड़ी 4

मीरचैतारी सं

सुन्दर पाहाड़ी 5

पोखरिया सं

सुन्दर पाहाड़ी 6

खेरासोल सं

सुन्दर पाहाड़ी 7

बरा धामनी सं

सुन्दर पाहाड़ी 8

माको मादगी सं

जोरधीया सं

द्वितीय

सुन्दर पाहाड़ी लिटीपाड़ा 2

लिटीपाड़ा

चोटा मुरजोड़ा सं

लिटीपाड़ा

बड़ा मुरजोरा सं

सिमलोंग सं

लिटीपाड़ा 5

अमरबीटा सं

लिटीपाड़ा क्षेत्र हेक्टेयर

जिला

टिप्पणियां 152.640

अंश गोड्डा

92.790

अंश गोड्डा

37.100

अंश गोड्डा

89.400

अंश गोड्डा

53.624

अंश गोड्डा

103.272

अंश गोड्डा

47.120

अंश गोड्डा

1.142

अश

गोड्डा

359.856

अंश पाकुड़

157.840

अंश

पाकुड़

137.437

अंश

पाकुड़

51.095

अंश पाकुड़

26.931

अंश पाकुड़ 2216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 2

7 6 बास बीता सं

57.720

लिटीपाड़ा

अंश

पाकुड़

मारगो सं

27.260

लिटीपाड़ा

अंश

पाकुड़

चोटा चटकम सं

16.640

लिटीपाड़ा

अश

पाकुड़

22.856

धोवपाहाड़ सं

अंश

गोड्डा

सुन्दर पाहाड़ी

लाडा पाथर सं

28.710

अंश

गोड्डा

सुन्दर पाहाड़ी

कुल

1463.433 हेक्टेयर (अनुमानतः)

1463.433 हेक्टयर ( अनुमानतः)

ब्लाक संख्या - 1 मौजा - छोटापुरा थाना संख्या 8 , थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी , जिला- गोड्डा

1(भाग) , 2(भाग) , 3( भाग ) , 4( भाग) , 5, 6( भाग) , 7 (भाग) , 8 , 9 , 10, 11 ( भाग) , 20( भाग) , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34, 35 , 36, 37 , 38 , 39 , 40, 41 , 42, 43 , 44 , 45 , 46,47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69,70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76, 77 , 78 , 79 , 80, 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85, 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 93,94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108, 109 , 110, 111 , 112 , 113 , 114, 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119 , 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132 , 133 , 134, 135 , 136 , 137,138 , 139, 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 146 , 147 ,

151 ,

145 ,

148 , 149 , 150, 152, 153 ( भाग) , 154, 155, 156 ( भाग ) , 157 (भाग) , 158(भाग) , 208 ( भाग) , 209( भाग) , 210( भाग ) , 211 , 213 ( भाग) , 214, 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 ( भाग) , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 (

भाग) , 258 (भाग ) , 261 ( भाग) , 262( भाग) , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266, 267 (भाग ) , 268 ( भाग ) , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272, 273 , 274 , 275 , 276, 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286, 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317, 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 333 , 334, 335 , 336 , 337, 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346, 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 332,

352, 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360, 361 , 362, 363 , 364, 365, 366 , 367, 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384,

372,

385 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 ,

386 ,

392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396, 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404 , 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 , 409 , 410 , 411 , 412 , 413 , 414, 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420, 421 , 422 , 423 , 424, 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430 , 431, 432 , 433 , 434 , 435 , 436 , 437 , 438 , 439 , 440 , 441 , 442 , 443 , 444 , 445 , 446 , 447 , 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457 , 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474, 475 , 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483, 484 , 485 , 486 , 487 , 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 494 , 495, 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530, 531 , 532 ,

535 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 541 ,

533 , 534 , 536,

540, 542 , 543 , 545 ,

548 ,

544 , 546 , 547 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565, 566 , 567 , 568 , 571 ,

569 , 570 , 572 , 573 , 574 , 575, 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584, 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , - 2217 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594, 595 , 596, 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612 , 613 , 614, 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620, 621 , 622 , 623 , 624 , 625 , 626 , 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634, 635 , 636 , 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642, 643 , 644 , 645 , 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 666 , 667 , 668 ,

665 ,

669 ,

686 ,

670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684 , 685 ,

688 ,

687 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704, 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732 ,

741 ,

733 , 734, 735, 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 742 , 743 , 744, 745 , 746, 747 , 748 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 753 ,

752 , 754 , 755, 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 761 ,

760 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 , 772 , 773, 774, 775, 777 , 778 ,

776 ,

779 , 780 , 781 , 782 , 783 , 784 , 785 , 786 , 787 , 788 , 789 , 790 , 791 , 792 , 793 , 794 , 795 , 796 , 797 , 798 , 799 , 800 , 801 , 802 , 803 , 804 , 805 , 806 , 807 , 808 , 809 , 810 , 811 , 812, 813 , 814 ,

815 , 816 , 817 , 818 , 819 , 820, 821 , 822 , 823 , 824 , 825 , 826 , 827 , 828 , 829 , 830, 831 , 832 , 833, 834 , 835, 836 , 837 , 838 , 839 , 840 , 841 , 842 , 843 , 844 , 845 , 846, 847 , 848 , 849 , 850 , 851 , 852 , 853 , 854, 855 , 856 , 857 , 858 , 859 , 860 , 861 , 862 , 863 , 864 , 865 , 866, 867 , 868 , 869 , 870 , 871 , 872, 873 , 874 , 875 , 876 , 877 , 878 , 879 , 880 , 881 , 882 , 883 , 884, 885 , 886 , 887 , 888 , 889 , 890 , 891 , 892 , 893 , 894 , 895 ,

901 , 902 , 903 , 904 , 905 , 906 , 907 , 908 ,

896 , 897,898 , 899 , 900 ,

909 , 910 , 911 , 912 , 913 , 914 , 915 , 916 , 917 , 918 , 919 , 920 , 921 , 922 , 923 , 924 , 925 , 926 , 927 , 928 , 929 , 930 , 931, 932 , 933 , 934 , 935 , 936, 937 , 938 , 939 , 940 , 941 , 942 , 943 , 944 , 945 , 946 , 947 , 948 , 949 , 950, 951 , 952 , 953 , 954 , 955 , 956, 857 , 958 , 959 , 960 , 961 , 962 , 963 , 964 , 965 , 966 , 967 , 968 , 969 , 970 , 971 , 972 , 973 , 974 , 975 , 976, 977 , 978 , 979 , 980 , 981 , 982, 983 , 984 , 985, 986 , 987 , 988 , 989 , 990 , 991 , 992 , 993 , 994, 995 , 996 , 997 , 998 , 999 , 1000, 1001 , 1002, 1003 , 1004, 1005 , 1006 , 1007 , 1008 , 1009 , 1010 , 1011 , 1012 , 1013 , 1014, 1015 , 1016 , 1017 , 1018 , 1019 , 1020 , 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024, 1025, 1026 , 1027 , 1028 , 1029 , 1030 , 1031 , 1032 , 1033 , 1034, 1035, 1036 , 1037 , 1038 , 1039 , 1040 , 1041 , 1042, 1043 , 1044, 1045 , 1046 , 1047 , 1048 , 1049 , 1050 , 1051 , 1052 , 1053 , 1054 , 1055 , 1056( भाग) , 1057 , 1058 , 1059 , 1060 , 1061 , 1062 , 1063 , 1064 , 1065 , 1066 , 1067 , 1068 , 1969 , 1070 , 1072 , 1073 , 1074 , 1075, 1076 , 1077 , 1078 , 1079 , 1080 , 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084, 1085, 1086, 1071 ,

1087, 1088 , 1089 , 1090 , 1091 , 1092, 1093 , 1094, 1095, 1096 , 1097 , 1098 , 1099, 1100 , 1101 , 1102 , 1103 , 1104, 1105 .

मौजा - गरीडीह थाना संख्या 9 थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी, जिला - गोड्डा

1 (भाग) , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6, 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ( भाग ) , 11 ( भाग) , 15( भाग ) , 17( भाग ) , 18 , 19 , 20, 21 , 22 ( भाग ) , 23, 24, 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54, 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68, 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73, 74, 75, 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85, 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104, 105, 106, 107 , 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115, 117, 119 ,

116, 118, 121 ,

120 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133, 134, 135 , 136 ,

139 ,

137,138 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144, 145, 146, 147 , 148 , 149, 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154, 155, 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164, 165 , 166 ,

171 ,

167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 172, 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 181 ,

180 , 182 , 183 , 184, 185 , 186 , 187, 188 , 189 , 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194, 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204, 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209, 210, 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 ,

217 ,

215, 216, 218 , 219 , 220, 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229, 231 , 232, 233 ,

230 ,

234, 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 2218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

259 ,

279 , 240, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246, 247 , 248 , 249 , 250, 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264, 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289, 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318, 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326, 327 , 328 , 329 , 330, 331 , 332, 333 , 334 , 335 , 336 , 337, 338 , 339 , 340, 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370, 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390, 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404 , 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 , 409 , 410 , 411 , 412 , 413 , 414, 415 , 416 , 417 ,

437, 438 , 439 , 440 , 441 , 442 , 443 , 444, 445 , 446 , 447 , 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457, 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585, 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612 , 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620, 621 , 622 , 623 , 624 , 625 , 626 , 627, 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423 , 424, 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432 , 433 , 434 , 435 , 436 , 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 , 485 , 486 , 487 , 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 494, 495 , 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536 , 537, 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 , 543 , 544 , 545 , 546, 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 556 , 557, 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574 , 575 , 636, 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644 , 645 , 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699, 700 , 701 ( भाग) , 702 ( भाग) , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713( भाग) , 714( भाग) , 716( भाग ) , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 ( भाग ) , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732 , 733 , 734 , 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741 , 742 , 743 , 744 , 745 , 746 , 747 , 748 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752 , 753 , 754 , 755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 ( भाग) , 772, 773 , 774 , 775(भाग ) , 777(भाग ) , 778( भाग ) , 780( भाग) , 781 ( भाग ) , 782 (भाग ) , 783 , 784, 785 ( भाग ) , 787 ( भाग) , 788 , 789 , 790( भाग) , 791 (भाग ) , 795 ( भाग ) , 796 ( भाग ) , 797 , 798 (भाग ) , 799 (भाग) , 800 ( भाग) , 805 (भाग) .

मौजा - पीपर जोरीया थाना संख्या 10 थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी, जिला गोड्डा

12(भाग) , 13 ( भाग ) , 26( भाग) , 27 , 28, 29 , 30, 31 ( भाग) , 32( भाग) , 34( भाग ) , 36 ( भाग ) , 37, 38 , 39, 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ( भाग) , 52( भाग) , 53, 54, 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75, 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80, 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86, 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137,138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144, 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155, 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 2219 भारत का राजषत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

187 (भाग) , 188 (भाग) , 189 , 190, 191, 192, 193 ( भाग) , 194( भाग) , 195(भाग) , 207 , 221 ( भाग) , 223 (भाग) , 224(भाग) , 234 ( भाग) , 235( भाग) , 236(भाग) , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242( भाग) , 243, 244, 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260( भाग) , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275, 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285, 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296, 297, 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316, 317 , 318 , 319, 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325, 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332, 333 , 334 , 335 , 336, 337 , 338, 339 , 340, 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345, 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355, 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370, 371 , 372 , 373 , 374, 375 , 376 .

मौजा - मीरचैतारी थाना संख्या 11 थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी, जिला गोड्डा

68, 69 , 70 , 71 ( भाग ) , 72( भाग) , 75, 76( भाग ) , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86, 87 , 88, 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99, 100 , 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105, 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110, 111 , 112 , 113, 114 , 115, 116, 117 , 118, 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125 , 126, 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133, 134, 135 , 136, 137,138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142 , 143 , 144, 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150, 151 , 152 , 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180, 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186, 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 255, 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286, 287, 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 409, 410 , 411 , 412 , 413 , 414, 415 , 416 , 417, 418 , 419 , 420, 421 , 422, 423 , 424, 425 , 426, 427 , 428 , 448, 449 , 450 , 451 , 452, 453 , 454, 455 , 456, 457 , 458, 459 , 460, 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466, 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484, 485, 486(भाग) , 487 , 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 494 , 495 , 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504, 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512, 513 , 514, 515 , 516, 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 11 (भाग) , 12 (भाग) , 13 , 14 , 15, 16, 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32( भाग) , 52 (भाग) , 53( भाग) , 54( भाग) , 55 , 56, 57, 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62, 63 , 64 , 65( भाग) , 66(भाग) , 67 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206, 207 , 208( भाग) , 209 (भाग) , 211 (भाग) , 242 ( भाग ) , 243 ( भाग) , 244( भाग) , 245 , 246, 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 (भाग) , 295, 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315, 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335, 336, 337 , 338, 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346 , 347, 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355, 356 , 357 , 358, 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375, 376 , 377 , 378, 379 , 380 (भाग) , 381 ( भाग) , 382 (भाग) , 383 (भाग ) , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390, 391 , 392 , 393 , 394, 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404, 405 , 406, 407 , 408 , 429, 430 , 431 , 432 , 433, 434 , 435 , 436, 437, 438 , 439 , 440 , 441 , 442 , 443, 444 , 445 , 446, 447, 524, 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530, 531 , 532(भाग ) , 533, 534, 535, 536( भाग) , 537( भाग ) , 538 (भाग) , 539( भाग) , 540 ( भाग) , 541 ( भाग) , 542( भाग ) , 543(भाग) .

मौजा - पोखरिया थाना संख्या 12 थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी , जिला गोड्डा

49 ( भाग ) , 50 ( भाग ) , 51 (भाग) , 56, 57 ( भाग ) , 58 ( भाग) , 59( भाग ) , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , * 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76, 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84, 85 , 86 , 87, 88 , 89 , 90, 91 ( भाग) , 92 , 565 G1/05-29 2220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14. 1926

[PART II- SEC 3 ( ii) ] 96 , 97 ,

93(भाग ) , 94( भाग) , 95 ( भाग) , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 104 ,

103 , 105 , 107 , 108 , 109 ,

106 ,

110, 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116, 117 , 118, 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 133 ,

132, 134, 135, 136,

141 , 142 ,

139 , 140 ,

137,138 ,

143 , 144 , 145, 146, 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 168 ,

167, 169 , 171 , 172 , 173 ,

170 ,

175 , 176 , 177 ,

174,

179 , 181 ,

178 , 180 ,

183 ,

182 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 191 , 192 ,

190 ,

193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204( भाग ) , 205, 206, 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 218 ,

217 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 223 ,

222 , 224, 225 , 226 , 227 , 228, 229 ( भाग) , 230, 231 ( भाग ) , 232 ( भाग) , 234( भाग ) , 241 242

(भाग ) , (भाग) , 243 , 244, 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 266 , 267 ,

265 ,

271 ,

268 , 269 , 270 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 289 , 290 , 291 ,

288 ,

294 ,

292 , 293 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 ( भाग) , 302( भाग ) , 303 ( भाग) , 306 , 307 ,

304( भाग) , 305,

308 , 309 , 311 ,

310 , 312 , 313 , 314, 315, 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 323 ,

322,

326,

324325, 327, 328 ( भाग) , 329(

भाग ) , 334( भाग ) , 335( भाग ) , 336 (भाग) , 337, 338 , 339 , 340, 341 ( भाग) , 351 ( भाग ) , 352, 353, 354( भाग) , 388 (भाग) .

मौजा - खेरासोल थाना संख्या 13 थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी , जिला - गोड्डा

60(भाग) , 61 ( भाग) , 64 , 65 , 66, 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ( भाग) , 73( भाग) , 83 ( भाग ) , 85( भाग ) , 86 , 87(

भाग) , 88 , 89 ( भाग) , 93( भाग) , 94( भाग) , 95, 96 , 97, 98 , 99( भाग ) , 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105 , 106, 107 , 108 , 109 , 110, 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119 , 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135 , 136 , 137,138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142 , 143 , 144, 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179, 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184, 185 , 186, 187 , 188 , 189, 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195, 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205, 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226, 227 , 228 , 229 , 230, 231 , 232 , 233 , 234, 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246, 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254, 255 , 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266, 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286, 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309, 310 , 311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315, 316, 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326, 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332(भाग) , 333 ( भाग ) , 334( भाग) , 335 , 336, 337, 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342, 343 , 344 , 345, 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350, 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362, 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370, 371 , 372 , 373 , 374, 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382, 383 , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396, 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404 , 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 , 409 , 410 , 411 , 412 , 413 , 414( भाग ) , 415, 416, 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423 , 424 , 425, 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432 , 433 , 434 , 435 , 436, 437, 438 , 439 , 440 , 441 , 442 , 443 , 444 , 445 , 446 , 447 , 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452, 453 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457 , 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 , 485 , 486 , 487 , 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492, 493 ( भाग) , 494(भाग) , 496(भाग) , 498 (भाग) , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504, 505, 506 (भाग ) , 507 ( भाग) , 508 ( भाग) , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515, 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 ( भाग) , 522( भाग) , 523, 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536, 537 , 538 , 539 , 540, 541 , 542(भाग ) , 543 (भाग) , 544( भाग ) , 577 ( भाग) , 578 , 579 , 580( भाग ) , 581 , 582, 583( भाग ) , 584 ( भाग ) , 598 (

भाग ) , 600 (भाग) , 614( भाग) , 615 (भाग ) , 682( भाग ) , 683 ( भाग) , 684, 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 (भाग) , 2221 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14,1926

713(भाग) , 714 , 715( भाग) , 732(भाग) , 733 , 734, 735, 736, 737(भाग) , 738 (भाग) , 740( भाग) , 741 , 742(भाग) , 743(भाग) , 748( भाग) , 749(भाग) , 795( भाग) , 796 (भाग) , 797(भाग) .

मौजा - बरा धामनी थाना संख्या 7 थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी , जिला- गोड्डा

1 , 2 , 3 , 4, 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12, 13 , 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22 , 23 , 24, 25, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36, 37 , 38 , 39 , 40, 41 , 42 , 43 , 44, 45 , 46, 47 , 48, 49 , 50, 51 , 52 , 53 , 54, 55 , 56, 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65, 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74, 75 , 76, 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83, 84( भाग) , 85( भाग) , 86( भाग) , 87( भाग) , 88 ( भाग) , 89( भाग) , 91 ( भाग ) , 92, 93, 94, 95(भाग ) , 96(भाग) , 97 ( भाग) , 98( भाग) , 297 ( भाग ) , 298 , 299( भाग ) , 305( भाग) , 306 , 307 (भाग ) , 310( भाग ) , 311 ( भाग) , 312( भाग ) , 313(भाग) , 314(भाग) , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334, 335 , 336, 337 , 338 , 339 , 340, 341 , 342, 343 , 344, 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353, 354 , 355 , 356, 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364, 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374, 375, 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382; 383, 384, 385( भाग) , 386 ( भाग) , 388 ( भाग) , 389(भाग ) , 390 ( भाग) , 393 ( भाग) , 394(भाग) , 395(भाग) , 397(भाग) , 398 ( भाग) , 399( भाग) , 445( भाग ) , 446, 447 , 448, 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457, 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469, 470 ( भाग) , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475, 476, 477 ( भाग) , 478(भाग) , 504(भाग) .

मौजा - माको मादगी थाना संख्या 16 थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी, जिला- गोड्डा

16 (भाग) एवं 19 (भाग).

ब्लाक संख्या - 2

मौजा जोरधीया थाना संख्या 1 थाना लिटीपाड़ा , जिला पाकुड़

1(भाग) , 2 (भाग) , 3 (भाग) , 4 ( भाग) , 5(भाग ) , 6(भाग) , 7 (भाग) , 8 , 9 , 10(भाग) , 11 ( भाग) , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15,

36 (भाग ) , 16, 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27 , 28 , 29 , 30, 31 , 32 , 33, 34 (भाग ) , 35( भाग ) ,

57 (भाग) ,

105, 106 , 107, 108, 109 , 110, 111 , 112 , 113 , 114, 115, 116 , 117, 118 , 119 , 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124) ,

263 ,

283 ,

303 ,

323 , 37( भाग) , 38 ( भाग ) , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44, 45 , 46( भाग) , 47( भाग) , 52(भाग) , 53 ( भाग) , 58(भाग) , 59 , 60, 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72, 73 , 74, 75, 76, 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82, 83 , 84, 85 , 86 , 87, 88 , 89 , 90, 91 , 92 , 93 , 94, 95 , 96, 97 , 98 , 99 , 100, 101 , 102 , 103 , 104, 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135, 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145, 146, 147 , 148 , 149 , 150, 151 , 152 , 153, 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175, 176 , 177, 178 , 179, 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194 , 195, 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200, 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205, 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213, 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224, 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235, 236, 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244, 245 , 246 , 247, 248 , 249, 250 , 251 , 252, 253 , 254 , 255, 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270, 271 , 272 , 273 , 274, 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 284, 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292, 293 , 294, 295, 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 304, 305 , 306 , 307, 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315, 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 324, 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334, 335, 336, 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 2222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 344, 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354, 355, 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369, 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376, 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382, 383, 384 , 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392, 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403, 404, 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 , 409 , 410 , 411 , 412 , 413 , 414, 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423, 424, 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432, 433 , 434, 435 , 436 , 437 , 438 , 439 , 440 , 441 , 442 , 443, 444, 445 , 446, 447 , 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457 , 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 477( भाग) , 481 (भाग) , 482(भाग) , 483 , 484, 485, 486( भाग) , 487 ( भाग) , 489( भाग) , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 ( भाग) , 515( भाग) , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534, 535 , 536 , 537, 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 , 543 , 544 , 545 , 546 , 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 556, 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574 , 575, 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595, 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612, 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624 , 625 , 626 , 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 636 , 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644 , 645 , 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670. 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715, 716 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726, 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732 , 733 , 734, 735, 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741 , 742 , 743 , 744, 745 , 746, 747 , 748 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752 , 753 , 754 , 755, 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764, 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 , 772, 773 , 774, 775 , 776 , 777 , 778 , 779 , 780 , 781 , 782 , 783 , 784 , 785 , 786 , 787 , 788 , 789 , 790 , 791 , 792 , 793 , 794, 795 , 796 , 797 , 798 (भाग) , 803 , 804 , 805 , 806, 808 , 810, 813 ( भाग) , 815 , 816, 818 , 819 , 820, 821 ..

मौजा - चोटा मुरजोड़ा थाना संख्या 2 थाना लिटीपाड़ा , जिला पाकुड़

1 (भाग) , 11 ( भाग) , 12 ( भाग ) , 13 ( भाग ) , 14 ( भाग) , 16 (भाग) , 17(भाग) , 18 ( भाग) , 19 ( भाग ) , 20 (भाग) , 46(भाग) , 47 (भाग) , 51 ( भाग) , 59 ( भाग ) , 60 ( भाग) , 61 ( भाग) , 62 (भाग ) , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87, 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97, 98 , 99 , 100( भाग) , 101 ( भाग) , 102 (भाग) , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106, 107, 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114, 115, 116, 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 ( भाग ) , 124(भाग ) , 125 (भाग ) , 126(भाग ) , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135 , 136, 137 , 138, 139 , 140, 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148, 149 , 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154, 155, 156, 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164, 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170, 171 , 172 , 173 ( भाग ) , 174, 175, 176, 177 (भाग) , 178( भाग ) , 179 ( भाग) , 180( भाग) , 181 (भाग) , 182 (भाग) , 183(भाग) , 184 (भाग ) , 185( भाग) , 186( भाग) , 187 ( भाग) , 188 ( भाग ) , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226, 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232, 233 , 234 , 235, 236, 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242, 243 , 244 , 245 , 246, 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266, 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295, 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310, 311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315, 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326, 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335, 336 , 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345 , 346, 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 2223 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

355, 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362, 363 , 364, 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , .374, 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390, 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397, 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404 , 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 , 409 , 410 , 411 , 412 , 413 , 414, 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423 , 424 , 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432 , 433, 434, 435 , 436 , 437 , 438 , 439 , 440 , 441 , 442 , 443 , 444 , 445 , 446 , 447 , 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453, 454, 455 , 456, 457 , 458 , 459 , 460, 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466, 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473, 474, 475 , 476 , 477 , 478, 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 , 485 , 486, 487 , 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 494 , 495 , 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502, 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532, 533 , 534 , 535, 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 , 543 , 544, 545 , 546, 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552, 553 , 554 , 555 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574 , 575 , 576, 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591, 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612 , 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624 , 625 , 626 , 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 636 , 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644 , 645 , 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724, 725, 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 . 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700, 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 731, 732 , 733 , 734, 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740, 741 , 742, 743 , 744 , 745, 746 , 747 , 748 , 749 , 750, 751 , 752 , 753 , 754 , 755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 , 772 , 773 , 774, 775 , 776 , 777 , 778 , 779 , 780 , 781 , 782 , 783 , 784 , 785 , 786 , 787 , 788 , 789 .

मौजा- बड़ा मुरजोड़ा थाना संख्या 3 थाना लिटीपाड़ा, जिला पाकुड़

3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ,

2 (भाग) ,

7( भाग) , 8 ( भाग) , 9 , 10, 11 , 12, 13 (भाग) , 14( भाग ) , 15, 16, 17, 18 (भाग ) , 21 (भाग ) , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ( भाग) , 30, 31 (भाग ) , 35(भाग) , 36 ( भाग) , 37 (भाग ) , 56 ( भाग ) , 57 ( भाग ) ,

65,

58(भाग ) , 59 ,60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ,

72 , 73 , 74 ,

66(भाग) , 68 ( भाग) , 69( भाग) , 70 , 71 ,

75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84( भाग) , 92 (भाग) , 93 (भाग ) , 94(

97, 98 (

भाग) , 95 ( भाग) , 96 , भाग ) , 99 ( भाग ) , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107, 108 , 109 , 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115, 100(भाग) , 101 ,

116, 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130, 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142, 143 , 144, 145 , 146, 147,

137,138 ,

148, 149, 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 166 ,

160 ,

165 ,

171 ,

167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186, 187 , 188 , 189, 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194, 195 , 196 , 197, 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202, 203 , 204 , 205 , 206, 207 , 208 ,

211 ,

209 , 210, 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216, 217 , 218 , 219 , 220, 221 , 222, 223, 224, 225 , 227 , 228 ,

226,

229 , 231 ,

230, 232, 233 , 234, 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242,

247 ,

243 , 244, 245 , 246,

249 , 250 , 251 , 252 ,

248 ,

253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257; 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 269 ,

268 , 270(भाग) , 271 (भाग) , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287, 288 , 292( भाग) , 293 (भाग ) , 294(भाग) , 300 (भाग ) , 313 (भाग) , 316(भाग) , 317( भाग) , 318 , 319, 320 , 321 ( भाग) , 326(भाग) , 327( भाग) , 328(भाग) , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335, 336, 337, 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345, 347 , 348 , 349 ,

346,

350 , 351 , 352, 353, 354, 355(भाग ) , 356 ( भाग) , 359 (

भाग) , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374, 375 , 376, 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 386 , 387 ,

384, 385 ,

388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 393 ,

392 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 ( भाग) , 2224

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

634 , 635 , 636 , 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644 , 645 , 646 , 647, 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 410(भाग) , 411 ( भाग) , 412 , 413 , 414 , 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 422( भाग) , 423 ( भाग) , 424 (भाग) , 425(भाग) , 432( भाग ) , 449 ( भाग) , 450 ( भाग) , 451 , 452 , 453 (भाग) , 454(भाग ) , 455( भाग) , 456 (भाग ) , 457 , 458 , 459 (भाग) , 460( भाग) , 464( भाग) , 465 , 466, 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475, 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 , 485 , 486 , 487 , 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 494 , 495 , 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504, 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522, 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536 , 537, 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 , 543 , 544, 545 , 546 , 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 (भाग ) , 568 ( भाग) , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574, 575 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612 , 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624 , 625 , 626 , 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684, 685 , 686 , 687, 688 , 689, 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732 , 733, 734 , 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741 , 742 , 743 , 744 , 745 , 746, 747 , 748 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752 , 753 , 754 , 755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 ( भाग ) , 771 , 772 , 773 ( भाग) , 774( भाग) , 778(भाग) , 786 ( भाग) , 787 ( भाग) , 790( भाग) , 791 , 792 , 793 , 794, 795, 796 , 797 , 798 , 799 , 800 , 801 , 802 , 803 , 804 , 805 , 806 , 807 , 808 , 809 , 810 , 811 , 812 , 813 , 814 , 815 , 816 , 817 , 818 , 819 , 820 , 821 , 822 ( भाग) , 823 (भाग) , 824 (भाग) , 825 (भाग ) , 826 , 827 ( भाग) , 828 (भाग) , 829 , 830, 831 ( भाग ) , 907( भाग) , 915 ( भाग ) , 916 ( भाग) , 917( भाग) , 918 , 919 , 920 , 921 , 922(भाग)

मौजा - सिमलोंग थाना संख्या 4 थाना लिटीपाड़ा, जिला पाकुड़

8 (भाग ) , 9 ( भाग) , 10 (भाग ) , 11 , 12 (भाग ) , 13 , 14, 15, 16 , 17, 18 , 19, 20, 21 , 22 , 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27 , 28, 29 , 30, 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ( भाग) , 35 (भाग ) , 36 , 37 (भाग) , 39 (भाग ) , 40 (भाग ) , 44 (भाग ) , 45 (भाग ) , 46 , 47 , 48 (भाग ) , 49, 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55, 56, 57, 58 (भाग ) , 59 (भाग ) , 60 (भाग ) , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68(भाग) , 69 (भाग ) , 71 (भाग ) , 72 ( भाग) , 73 , 74(भाग ) , 75, 76 , 77 , 78 ( भाग ) , 79 (भाग ) , 80 (भाग ) , 82(भाग ) , 92 (भाग ) , 93 (भाग ) , 94, 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 (भाग) , 126 ( भाग ) , 127(भाग ) , 128 (भाग ) , 129 (भाग) , 130 ( भाग) , 131 (भाग ) , 132(भाग) , 174(भाग) , 200(भाग) , 201 (भाग ) , 209 (भाग ) , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219( भाग ) , 220 (भाग ) , 221 ( भाग) , 226 ( भाग) , 227 (भाग) , 233 (भाग) , 234, 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246, 247(भाग) , 248(भाग) , 249 (भाग ) , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 ( भाग) , 255 (भाग ) , 256 (भाग ) , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 (भाग ) , 264 (भाग) , 265 (भाग ) , 266 (भाग) , 276 (भाग ) , 277 , 278 ( भाग) , 279 ( भाग ) , 281 , 282, 283 , 284, 285, 286(भाग) , 287(भाग) , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294, 295 (भाग ) , 303 (भाग ) , 304, 305, 306, 307 (भाग) , 308 (भाग ) , 309 ( भाग ) , 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 ( भाग ) , 318 , 319, 320 , 321 ( भाग ) , 322 (भाग) , 325 ( भाग) , 331 (भाग) , 332 , 333 (भाग ) , 334, 335, 336 , 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345, 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355, 356, 357 (भाग) , 364 , 365, 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370, 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380, 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387, 388, 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 (भाग ) , 401 , 402, 403, 404 , 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 , 409 , 410, 411 , 412 , 413 , 414 , 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423 , 424 , 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430, 431 , 432, 433, 434 , 435 , 436 ( भाग ) , 437 (भाग ) , 438(भाग ) , 439 ( भाग) , 440 , 441 , 442 , 443 , 444(भाग) , 449 (भाग ) , 450 , 451 , 452 (भाग ) , 462 (भाग ) , 463 (भाग ) , 464 (भाग ) , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473, 474(भाग) .

1 2225

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

मौजा - अमरबीटा थाना संख्या- 7 थाना लिटीपाड़ा , जिला- पाकुड़

1(भाग) , 112 (भाग) , 113(भाग) .

मौजा - वास बीता थाना संख्या ४ थाना लिटीपाड़ा, जिला पाकुड़ 1 (भाग ) , 2 , 3 , 4( भाग) , 5(भाग) , 7(भाग) , 8( भाग) , 9( भाग) , 68(भाग) , 69(भाग) , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75, 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82, 83 , 84, 85 , 86, 87 , 88 , 89, 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94, 95 , 96, 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102, 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132, 133, 134(भाग) , 135, 136, 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145, 146, 147 , 148 , 149 , 150, 151 , 152, 153 , 154 , 155, 156, 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164, 165, 166, 167 , 168 , 169, 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185, 186, 187( भाग) , 188 , 189, 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194, 195 , 196( भाग) , 197( भाग) , 198( भाग) , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 .

मौजा- मारगो थाना संख्या 9 थाना लिटीपाड़ा , जिला पाकुड़

1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 (भाग ) , 9 ( भाग) , 15 ( भाग ) , 16 (भाग) , 17 , 18 ( भाग) , 101 (भाग ) , 102( भाग) , 103 , 104, 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110, 111 .

मौजा - चोटा चटकम थाना संख्या 10 थाना लिटीपाड़ा , जिला पाकुड़

352(भाग ) , 355, 356 , 357 , 358 , 359, 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372, 373 , 374 , 375, 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385 , 386, 387 , 388 (भाग) , 389 (भाग ) , 402 (भाग) , 403(भाग) .

मौजा - धोवपाहाड़ थाना संख्या- 26 थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी, जिला- गोड्डा

1 (भाग) , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22 , 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27 ( भाग) , 28 , 29 , 30 ( भाग) , 31 , 32 , 33 (भाग) , 34 (भाग) , 35( भाग) , 36 (भाग) , 37 (भाग ) , 38 (भाग ) , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45, 46(भाग ) , 47 ( भाग) , 48 (भाग) , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52, 53 , 54 , 55, 56, 57, 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 (भाग ) , 68 , 69 ( भाग) , 74(भाग) , 75(भाग ) , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 (भाग) , 80, 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85(भाग ) , 94 ( भाग) , 95, 96( भाग) , 97, 98 , 99 , 100(भाग) .

मौजा - लाडा पाथर थाना संख्या 27 थाना सुन्दरपहाड़ी, जिला गोड्डा

137,138 ,

255,

293 , 3 (भाग) , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10, 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25, 26, 27 , 28 , 29, 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 , 40, 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45, 46, 47 , 48, 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76, 77 , 78 , 79 , 80, 81 , 82, 83 , 84 , 85 , 86, 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97, 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107, 108 , 109, 110, 111, 112, 113 , 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132 (भाग) , 133 ( भाग ) , 134(भाग) , 135, 136, 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146, 147 , 148 (भाग ), 150 (भाग ), 151 (भाग ) , 156 (भाग ) , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164, 165(भाग) , 166(भाग) , 246 (भाग) , 247 (भाग) , 248 (भाग) , 249, 250, 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 256, 257 (भाग ) , 258 (भाग ) , 259 (भाग ) , 260(भाग ) , 261 (भाग) , 286, 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297, 299 , 300, 310 (भाग) .

2226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]

सीमा विवरण

ब्लाक - 1 ( ए1 - ए 18)

ए । - ए2 यह रेखा जो मौजा चोटापुरो संख्या 8 के थाना - सुन्दरपहाड़ी, जिला गोड्डा(झारखण्ड) संख्या में 221 ए 1 विन्दु से शुरू होकर और मौजा के प्लाट संख्या 210 , 209, 261 , 262, 267 , 268 , 153 से गुजरती हुई मौजा चोटापुरी सं0 8 में प्लाट सं0 158 की पूर्वी सीमा में बिन्दु ए2 पर मिलती है ।

ए2 - एउ यह रेखा जो मौजा चोटापुरो संख्या 8 में ए2 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर संख्या 158 , 157 , 156 एवं प्लाट सं 1 एवं 2 से गुजरती हुई चोटापुरी सं० 8 के संख्या 01 के विन्दु एउ पर मिलती है ।

एउ - ए4 यह रेखा जो मौजा चोटापुरो संख्या 8 के प्लाट संख्या 01 में एउ बिन्दु से शुरु होकर प्लाट सं 3 , 4 , 7 , 6 , 11 से गुजरती हुई मौजा चोटापुरो संख्या 8 के प्लाट सं 11 में बिन्दु ए4 पर मिलती है ।

ए4 - ए5 यह रेखा जो मौजा चोटापुरो संख्या 8 के प्लाट सं 11 में ए4 बिन्दु से शुरु होकर और प्लाट सं 20 से गुजरती हुई तथा मौजा चोटापुरो सं 8 एवं गरिडीह सं 9 की साझा सीमा को पार करती हुई गरिडीह सं0 9 के प्लाट सं 22 , 21 , 17, 15 , 10 , 11 एवं 1 से गुजरती हुई और मौजा पीपर जोरिया संख्या 10 एवं गरिडीह संख्या 9 की साझा सीमा में प्रवेश करती हुई और संख्या 24, 26 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 13 , 51 , 52 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 198 , 188 , 187 , 235 , 236 , 242 , से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 242 मौजा पीपर जोरिया संख्या 10 में ए5 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए5 - ए6 यह रेखा जो कि मौजा पीपर जोरिया संख्या 10 प्लाट सं0 242 में ए5 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 243 , 223 , 260 , 221 से गुजरती हुई और मौजा पीपर जोरिया संख्या 10 एवं मीरचैतारी संख्या 11 के साझा सीमा रेखा में प्रवेश करती हुई , और प्लाट संख्या 11 , 12, 75 , 76, 72, 71 , 67 , 66 , 65 , 53 , 52 , 209 , 208 , 211 , 243, 242 से गुजरती हुई मौजा मीरचैतारी और संख्या 11 के संख्या 254 में ए6 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए6 - ए7 यह रेखा ए6 विन्दु मौजा मीर चैतारी संख्या 11 से शुरू होकर मौजा पोखरिया संख्या 12 , मीर चैतारी संख्या 11 की साझा सीमा को पार करती हुइ मौजा पोखरिया संख्या 12 के प्लट संख्या 243 , 242, 241 , 234 , 232, 231 , 229 , 230 , 59 , 60 , 58 , 57 , 55 , 51 , 50 , 49 , 91 , 93 , से गुजरती हुइ ए7 विन्दु प्लट संख्या 94 मे मिलती है । ए7 - ए8 यह रेखा मौजा पांखरिया संख्या 12 के ए7 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 94 , 95 से गुजरती हुई और मौजा खेरासोल संख्या 13 एवं पोखरिया संख्या 12 की साझा सीमा रेखा में प्रवेश करती हुई प्लाट संख्या 85 , 87 , 89 , 99 , 93 , 94 , 83 , 73 , 72 , 60 , 63 , 61 , 64 , 542 , 543 , 544 , 577 , 580 , 583 , 584 , 597 से गुजरती हुई मौजा खेरासोल संख्या 13 और प्लाट संख्या 531 में ए8 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए४ - ए१ यह रेखा मौजा खेरासोल सं० 13 , सं0 531 में ए 8 बिन्दु से आरंभ होकर और प्लाट सं0 598, 614 , 522 , 521 , 615 , 508 , 507 , 506 , 630 , 498 , 496 , 494, 493 , 683 , 682 , 715 , 713 , 712 , 731 , 732 , 738 , 740 , 749 , से गुजरती हुई प्लाट सं0 748 में ए 9 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए१ - ए10 यह रेखा संख्या मौजा खेरासोल संख्या 13 , प्लाट संख्या 748 में ए9 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और संख्या 742 , 737, 743 , 755 से गुजरती हुई और गुमानी नदी के पश्चिमी किनारे को पार करती हुई खेरासोल संख्या 13 के प्लाट संख्या 795 में विन्दु 10 ए पर मिलती है ।

ए10 - ए ।। यह रेखा मौजा खेरासोल संख्या 13, गुमानी नदी प्लाट संख्या 795 , में ए 10 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 795 , 796 से गुजरती हुई और गुमानी नदी के पश्चिम किनारे के पार कर प्लाट संख्या 414, में प्रवेश करते हुए 2227 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

और प्लाट संख्या 334, 333 , 332 , से गुजरते हुए और पुनः गुमानी नदी को पार करते हुए तथा प्लाट संख्या 124 गुमानी नदी से गुजरती हुई ए 11 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए 11 - ए12 यह रेखा गुमानी नदी एवं मौजा खेरासोल संख्या 13 , के प्लाट संख्या संख्या 124 में ए 11 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और गुमानी नदी के पूर्वी किनारे एवं मौजा चोटा मुर जोरा संख्या 2 की साझा सीमा रेखा से गुजरती हुई तथा प्लाट संख्या 46 , 47 , 20 , 19, 18, 17 , 16 , 14, 15, 13 , 12, 11 से गुजरती हुई फिर गुमानी नदी के पूर्वी और मौजा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 की साझा सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई गुमानी नदी से होकर प्लाट संख्या 388 में ए 12 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए12 - ए13 यह रेखा ए ।2 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 301 , 302, 303 , 304 , 329 , 328 , 334 , 335 , 336 , 341 , 351 , 354 से गुजरती हुई और मौजा पोखरिया संख्या 12 एवं मिरचैतारी संख्या 11 की साझा सीमा रेखा से होकर प्लाट संख्या 485 , 486 , 543 , 542 , 541 , 540 , 539 , 538 , 537 , 536 से गुजरती हुई और गुमानी नदी के पश्चिम किनारे को पार करती हुई प्लाट संख्या 532 में ए13 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए13 - ए14 यह रेखा जो गुमानी नदी मौजा मारचैतारी संख्या 11 में ए 13 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर गुमानी नदी के प्लाट संख्या 532 गुमानी नदी के पश्चिम किनारे को पार करती हुई इसी मौजा के प्लाट संख्या 382 , 383 , 380 , 381 से गुजरती हुई मौजा मारचैतारी संख्या 11 एवं पीपर जोरिया संख्या 10 के साझा सीमा रेखा के बिन्दु ए 14 पर मिलती हैं । ए14 - ए15 यह रेखा ए 14 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर मौजा गरिडिह संख्या 9 में प्रवेश करते हुए , प्लाट संख्या 667 , 668 , 699 , 805 , से गुजरती हुई , प्लाट संख्या 669 , को पार करते हुए तथा प्लाट संख्या 701 , 702 , 714 , 713 , 716 , 720 , 721 , 669 , 798 , 796 , 795 , 791 , 790 , 787 , 785 , 782 , 781 , 780 , 778 , 777 , 775 , 771 से गुजरती हुई और मौजा गरिडिह संख्या 9 एवं बड़ा धामनी संख्या 7 की साझा सीमा रेखा से गुजरती हुई और प्लाट संख्या 87 , 89 , 91 , 95, 96, 97, 98 , 85 से गुजरती हुई मौजा बड़ा धामनी संख्या 7 में ए 15 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए15 - ए16 यह रेखा मौजा बड़ा धामनी संख्या 7 , प्लाट संख्या 84 में ए 15 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 230,231 , 232, 233. की उत्तरी सीमा में से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 318 , 239 , 314 , 313 , 312 , 311 , 310 , 307 , 305 , 304, 303 , 301 , 299 , 297 , 385 , 386 , 388 , 389 , 390 , 394, 395 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 375 , 445 , 504 से गुजरती हुई मौजा बड़ा धामनी संख्या 7 के ए16 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए 16 - ए17 यह रेखा मौजा बड़ा धामनी के संख्या 7, प्लाट संख्या 504 में ए 16 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 504 से गुजरती हुई ए 17 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ए17 - ए 18 यह रेखा मौजा बड़ा धामनी संख्या 7, के ए17 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 504, 470 , 477 , 478 , से गुजरती हुई मौजा माको माधगी संख्या 16 की साझा सीमा रेखा मे प्रवेश करती हुई और मौजा माको माधगी संख्या 16 के और प्लाट संख्या 19, 16 , से गुजरती हुई मौजा चोटा पुरो संख्या 8 एवं माको माधगी संख्या 16 की साझा सीमा रेखा से गुजरती हुई और मौजा चोटा पुरो संख्या 8 के प्लाट संख्या 1056 के ए 18 बिन्दु पर मिलती है । ए18 - ए1 यह रेखा मौजा चोटा पुरो संख्या 8 के प्लाट संख्या 1056 में ए 18 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 215 , 213 , से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 221 मौजा चोटा पुरो संख्या ४ थाना सुन्दर पहाड़ी , जिला गोड्डा में ए। बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

सीमा विवरण ब्लाक्त - 2 (बि 1 - बि 27)

बी1 - बी2 यह रेखा मौजा बड़ा धामनी संख्या 7, थाना सुन्दर पहाड़ी, जिला गोड्डा प्लाट संख्या 100 के बी । बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , से गुजरती हुई और गुमानी नदी के पूर्वी किनारे को पार करती हुई , 565 G1 / 05-30 2228

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

813 , प्लाट सं० 1175 , से गुजरती हुई और प्लाट संख्या 1161 , 1162 , 1165 के दक्षिणी सीमा से गुजरती हुई गुमानी नदी के दक्षिणी किनारे को पार करती हुई और मौजा जोरडीह संख्या 1 में प्रवेश करती हुई , प्लाट संख्या 496, 489, 493 से गुजरती हुई मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 1 , थाना लिट्टीपाड़ा जिला पाकुड़ के प्लाट संख्या में 489 बिन्दु बी2 पर मिलती हैं ।

बी2- बी.3 यह रेखा मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 489 में बी 2 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 487 , 486,485, 482, 480, 477 , 515 से गुजरती हुई मौजा जोरडीहा सं० 1 के प्लाट संख्या 515 में बी 3 बिन्दु पर मिलती है । बी3 - वी4 यह रेखा मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 515 में बिन्दु बी 3 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 515, 798 से गुजरती हुई मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 1 एवं छोटा चटकम संख्या 10 की साझा सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई प्लाट संख्या 353 , 354 के पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई और प्लाट संख्या 352 , 342 , 403 , 402 , 388 , 389 से गुजरती हुई , मौजा छोटा चटकम संख्या 10 एवं मोरगो संख्या 9 की साझा सीमा रेखा से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 7 , 8 , 9 , 16 , 15, 18, से गुजरती हुई मौजा मारगो संख्या 9 में बी 4 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी4- बी5 यह रेखा मौजा मारगो संख्या 9 में बी 4 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 102, 101,1 से गुजरती हुई , मौजा मारगो संख्या 9 एवं बांसभीटा संख्या 8 की साझा सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई प्लाट संख्या 187 , 191 , से गुजरती हुई मौजा बांसभीटा सं 0 8 में बी 5 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी5- बी6 यह रेखा मौजा बांसवीथा संख्या 8 में बी 5 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर इसी मौजा की प्लाट संख्या 205 , 68 , एवं प्लाट संख्या 25 के उत्तरी पूर्व किनारे से गुजरती हुई और प्लाट संख्या 9 , 8 , 4, 5, 1 से गुजरती हुई और मौजा बांशबीथा संख्या 8 एवं जोरडीहा संख्या 1 की साझा सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई और जोरडीहा संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 807 से गुजरती हुई बी 6 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी6 - बी7 यह रेखा मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 01 में बी 6 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर मौजा अमरबीथा संख्या 7 एवं जोरडीहा संख्या 1 की साझा सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई और मौजा अमरबीथा प्लाट संख्या । से गुजरती हुई बी 7 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी7- बी8 यह रेखा मौजा अमरबीथा संख्या 7 में बी 7 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 1 प्लाट संख्या 111 की पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई, प्लाट संख्या 112 , 113 , 1 से गुजरती हुई मौजा अमरबीथा संख्या 7 में बी 8 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी8 - बी9 यह रेखा मौजा अमरबीथा संख्या 7 में बी 8 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और मौजा बड़ा मुरजोरा संख्या 3 एवं अमरबीथा संख्या 7 की साझा सीमा रेखा में प्रवेश करते हुई , प्लाट संख्या 922, 920 , 914 , 916 , 917 , 918 , 831 , 828 , 827 , 825 , 824 , 823 , 822 , 790 , 787 , 786 , 778 , 770 , 773 , 774, 432 , 567 , 464 , 460, 459 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु बी 9 पर मिलती है ।

बी9 - बी10 यह रेखा मौजा बड़ा मुरजोरा संख्या 3 के प्लाट संख्या 448 में बी9 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर, प्लाट संख्या 455 , 454, 453 , 450, 425 , 424 , 423 , 422 , 410 , 411 , 401 , 359 , 355 , 356 से गुजरती हुई और बड़ा मुरजोरा संख्या 3 एवं मौजा सिमलोंग संख्या 4 की साझा सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई , प्लाट संख्या 37 , 38 , 40 , 35 , 34, 44, 45 , 48 , 69 , 68 , 67 , 72 , 71 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु बी 10 पर मिलती है ।

बी10 - बी11 यह रेखा में मौजा सिमलोंग संख्या 4 के प्लाट संख्या 448 में बी 9 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर, प्लाट संख्या 98 , 100 , 256 257 , 255 , 253 , 249 , 247, 248 , 257, 126 , 127, 128 , 132 , 131 , 174, और 432 से गुजरती हुई मौजा सिमलोंग संख्या 4 के प्लाट संख्या 558 में बी 11 बिन्दु पर मिलती है । 2229 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/ फाल्गुन 14,1926

बी11 12 यह रेखा मौजा सिमलोंग संख्या 4 के प्लाट संख्या 74 में बी 10 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर , प्लाट संख्या 559 में बी 11 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी12- बी13 यह रेखा मौजा सिमलोंग संख्या 4 में बी 12 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर , प्लाट संख्या 559 , 432 , 174, 132 , 131 , 130 , 129, 128 , 257 , 248 , 247 से गुजरती हुई बी 13 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी13 - बी14 यह रेखा सिमलोंग संख्या 4 के प्लाट संख्या 247 में बी 13 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर , प्लाट संख्या 247 , 233 , 227 , 226 , 220 , 221 , 219 , 200 , 210 201 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 309 , 307 से गुजरती हुई बी 14 बिन्दु पर मिलती है। बी14 बी15 यह रेखा मौजा सिमलोंग संख्या 4, प्लाट संख्या 307 में बी 14 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर , प्लाट संख्या 308 , 303 , 301 , 333 , 486 , 483 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 481 , 436 , 437 , 438 , 439 , 444, 449 , 452, 464, 462 , 463 , 468 , 474 , 543 , 400, 615 , से गुजरती हुई और लादा नदी को पार करती हुई , मौजा सिमलोंग संख्या 4 एवं लादापाथार संख्या 27 की साझा सीमा रेखा पर बी 15 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी15 बी16 यह रेखा जो साझा सीमा में बी 15 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और मौजा लादापाथार संख्या 27 के प्लाट संख्या 167 , 166 , 165 , 156 , 151 , 150 , 148 , 134 , 133 , 247 , 246 , 248 , 257, 258 , 259 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 261 में बी 16 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी16 - बी17 यह रेखा जो मौजा लादा पाथार संख्या 27 के प्लाट संख्या 261 में बी 16 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 261 , 260, 310 , 300 से गुजरती हुई , लादा पाथार संख्या 27 एवं धोपहाड़ संख्या 26 की साझा सीमा रेखा से गुजरती हुई और प्लाट संख्या 262,67 , 69 , 74, 75 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 100 में बी 17 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी17- बी18 यह रेखा मौजा धोपहाड़ संख्या 26 के प्लाट संख्या 100 में बी 17 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 100 , 96, 94, 79, 85 से गुजरती हुई बी 18 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी18 - बी19 यह रेखा जो मौजा धोपहाड़ संख्या 26 एवं गुमानी नदी के दक्षिणी किनारे की साझा सीमा रेखा के बी 18 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर गुमानी नदी से गुजरती हुई तथा मौजा धोपहाड़ संख्या 26 के प्लाट संख्या 48 , 47 , 46, 37 , 36, 38 , 35 , 34 , 33 , 30 , 27 , 26 , 1 से गुजरती हुई, धोपहाड़ संख्या 26 एवं मौजा लादा पाथर संख्या 27 की साझा सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई और गुमानी नदी से गुजरती हुई लादापाथार संख्या 27 के प्लाट संख्या 3 , गुमानी नदी के दक्षणी तट पर बी 19 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी19 - बी20 यह रेखा जो मौजा लादापाथार संख्या 27 के प्लाट संख्या 3 में बी 19 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और मौजा लादापाथार संख्या 27 एवं सिमलोंग संख्या 4 के साझा सीमा रेखा से गुजरती हुई , प्लाट संख्या 363 , 357 , 358, 356 , 331 , 321 , 322 , 317 , 280, 279, 278, 276 , 286, 287 , 265 , 264, 263 , 92, 93 , 78 , 79 , 80 , से गुजरती हुई मौजा सिमलोंग संख्या 60 के पश्चिमी किनारे पर बी 20 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी20 बी21 यह रेखा बी20 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 60 , 58 , 8,9 , 12 से गुजरती हुई और मौजा सिमलोंग संख्या 4 एवं बड़ा मुरजोरा संख्या 3 की साझा सीमा रेखा मै प्रवेश करते हुई , प्लाट संख्या 326 , 327 , 328, 321 , 317 , से गुजरती हुई बी 21 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी21 - बी22 यह रेखा में मौजा बड़ा मुरजोरा संख्या 3 के प्लाट संख्या 317 में बी 21 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 316 , 313 , 270 , 271 , 300 , 294 , 293 , 292 , 288 से गुजरती हुई गुमानी नदी में बी 22 बिन्दु पर मिलती है। 2230

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

बी22- बी23 यह रेखा गुमानी नदी में बी22 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और मौजा बड़ा मुरजोरा संख्या 3 एवं खेरासोल संख्या 13 की साझा सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई तथा मौजा बड़ा मुरजोरा संख्या 3 के प्लाट संख्या 284 , 223 , 101 , 100, 99 , 98 , 94, 95, 93 , 92 , 84, 69 , 68 , 66 , 56 , से गुजरती हुई बी23 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी23- बी24 यह रेखा मौजा बडा मुरजोरा संख्या 3 के प्लाट संख्या 57 में बी23 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 58 , 29, 42, 37 , 36 , 35 , 31 , 21 , 18 19 , 14, 13 , 8 , 7 , 2 से गुजरती हुई एवं मौजा बड़ा मुरजोरा संख्या 3 एवं छोटा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 की साझा सीमा में प्रवेश करती हुई और मौजा छोटा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 के प्लाट संख्या 188 , 187 , 186 , 185 , 184, 183 , 182 , 181 , 180 , 179 , 178 , 177 , 173 से गुजरती हुई और गुमानी नदी और मौजा छोटा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 की साझा सीमा रेखा से होकर गुजरती हुई एवं गुमानी नदी प्लाट संख्या 124 को पार करती हुई पुनः गुमानी नदी और मौजा छोटा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 की साझा सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई मौजा छोटा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 के प्लाट संख्या 125 में बि 24 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी24 - बी25 यह रेखा मौजा छोटा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 के प्लाट संख्या 125 में बी 24 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 126 , 125 , 120, 123 , 102 , 101 , 100 , 62 , 60 , 59 , 51 से गुजरती हुई मौजाछोटा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 के प्लाट संख्या 704 में बी25 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी25 - बी26 यह रेखा मौजा छोटा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 के प्लाट संख्या 704 में बी 25 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और प्लाट संख्या 704 से गुजरती हुई तथा मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 1 एवं छोटा मुरजोरा संख्या 2 की साझा सीमा को पार करते हुई और प्लाट संख्या 820 , 51 , 262 , 57 , 58 , 53 , 131 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 53 में बी 26 बिन्दु पर मिलती है । बी26- बी27 यह रेखा मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 53 में बी 26 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर, मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 52 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 38 , 34 , 35 , 36, 37 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 2 के पूर्वी कोने पर बी27 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

बी27 - बी1 यह रेखा मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 2 में बी 27 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर, मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या 1 के प्लाट संख्या 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 से गुजरती हुई एवं मौजा जोरडीहा संख्या । और गरीडीह संख्या 9 की साझा सीमा रेखा प्रवेश करती हुई, गुमानी नदी से गुजरती हुई मौजा बड़ा धामनी संख्या 7 एवं गरीडीह संख्या 9 की साझा सीमा को पार करते हुई मौजा बड़ा धामनी संख्या 7 थाना सुन्दर पहाड़ी, जिला गोड्डा के प्लाट संख्या 100 में बी 1 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015 / 10/ 2002- पी. आर. आई. डब्ल्यू. ] बी. के. पण्डा, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 24th February, 2005

S. O. 793.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 1253 dated the 21.04.2003 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Area (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 , (20 of 1957 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, in Part II, section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) dated 26.04.2003 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for Coal in 1463.433 hectares (approximately ) of land in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification .

And, whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable from the said land;

-- 2231 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/ फाल्गुन 14,1926

Now , therefore , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Area (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 , (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal , number S.O. 237 , dated 22.1.2004 , except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 1463.433 hectares (approximately ) in all rights as the schedule appended here to .

Note 1 : - The plan bearing number ECL/ CHUB/MOUZA/08 Dated 27.10.2004 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Dy . Commissioner , District , Godda and Pakur (Jharkhand ) ) , or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata 700 001 , or in the office of the Director Technical (Operation) , Eastern Coalfields Limited , Sanctoria , Post Office Dishergarh , Dist . Burdwan ( West Bengal ) . Pin Code Number 713 333 .

Note 2 : Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) , which provides as follows: -

" 8 Objection to acquisition " : -

(1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which notification under section 7 has been issued may , within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land.

Explanation . It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of the coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Government or any other person .

(2) Every objection under sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further enquiry , if any , as he thinks necessary , either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land , to the Central Government , containing his recommendations on the objections together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decisions of that Government .

(3) For the purposes of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who will be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were enquired under this Act . "

Note The Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata 700001 has been appointed by the Central Govt. as the competent authority under the Act . Vide notification number S.O. 2520 dated 11th June , 1983 .

2232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Schedule

Block First and Second

Chuperbhita Block ( Rajmahal Coalfields )

Block

District

Remarks

Thana no .

Police station

Area hectares

Mouza village

SI . no

1st

Part Chota Puro No

Godda 152.640

Sundar- Pahari

2 Garidih No.

92.790

Part

Godda

Sundar- Pahari

Part

Godda

37.100

Piperjoria No.

Sundar- Pahari

Godda

Part

89.400

Mirchaitari No.

Sundar- Pahari

Godda 53.624

Part Pokharia No.

Sundar- Pahari

Godda 103.272

Part Kherasole No.

Sundar- Pahari

47.120

Godda

Part Bara Dhamni No.

Sundar- Pahari

Part

Godda 1.142

Mako -Madgi

Sundar- Pahari

2nd

359.856

Part Jordiha No.

Pakur

Littipara

Pakur

Part

157.840

Littipara

ChotaMurjora No

Pakur

Part

137.437

Bara Murjora No.

Littipara

Part

Pakur

51.095

Simlong No.

Littipara

Pakur

Part Amar Bita No.

26.931

Littipara

Basbita No.

Pakur

Part

57.720

Littipara

Pakur

27.260

Part Margo No.

Littipara

Pakur 16.640

Part

Littipara

Chota Chatkam No.

Part

22.856

Godda

Dhouphar No.

Sundar- Pahari

Godda

Part

28.710

Lada pathar

Sundar- Pahari

Grand Total

= 1463.433

1463.433 Hect . ( Approximately ) 2233

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Block No. 1

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Chotapuro Thana No.8

P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

268 (P ) , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286, 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 483, 484, 485 , 486, 487, 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, 498 , 499, 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522,523,524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536 , 591,592 , 593,594 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600, 601 , 602 , 603 , 604, 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 ,

626 , 645, 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656, 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 ,

698 ,

716 ,

734 , 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741 , 742 , 743 , 744 , 745 , 746 , 747 , 748 , 749 , 750, 751 , 752 ,

770 ,

788 , 1 (P ) , 2( P) , 3 ( P) , 4 ( P ) , 5 , 6 (P) , 7( P ) , 8 , 9 , 10, 11 ( P) , 20 ( P) , 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25 , 26, 27 , 28 , 29, 30 , 31 , 32, 33 , 34 , 35, 36, 37, 38 , 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 , 50, 51 , 52 , 53, 54 , 55 , 56, 57 , 58 , 59 , 60, 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70, 71 , 72, 73 , 74 , 75 , 76, 77, 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86, 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97, 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107, 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112, 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117, 118 , 119, 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127, 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137,138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142, 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149, 150 , 151 , 152 , 153(P ) , 154 , 155 , 156(P) , 157( P) , 158 ( P) , 208( P) , 209 ( P ) , 210( P ) , 211 , 213 ( P) , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 ( P) , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 ( P) , 258 ( P) , 261 ( P) , 262( P) , 263 , 264, 265 , 266 , 267 (P ) , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306, 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316, 317 , 318 , 319 , 320, 321 , 322 , 323 , 324, 325, 326 , 327, 328, 329, 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335 , 336 , 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342, 343 , 344, 345, 346, 347, 348 , 349, 350, 351 , 352, 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364, 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369, 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380, 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390, 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397, 398 , 399, 400 , 401 , 402, 403 , 404, 405 , 406, 407, 408 , 409 , 410 , 411 , 412, 413 , 414, 415 , 416 , 417, 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422, 423 , 424 , 425, 426 , 427, 428 , 429,430 , 431 , 432 , 433 , 434 , 435 , 436 , 437 , 438 , 439 , 440 , 441 , 442, 443 , 444 , 445 , 446, 447, 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452, 453 , 454, 455, 456, 457, 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462, 463 , 464, 465, 466, 467, 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474, 475 , 476, 477, 478 , 479 , 480, 481 , 482 , 537,538 , 539 , 540,541,542 , 543 , 544 , 545 , 546 , 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567, 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573,574 , 575 , 576 , 577,578,579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612, 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617, 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624 , 625 , 627, 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632, 633 , 634, 635 , 636 , 637, 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642,643 , 644 , 663 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675, 676, 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692, 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697, 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730, 731 , 732 , 733 , 753 , 754 , 755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760, 761 , 762, 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767, 768 , 769 , 771 , 772 , 773,774,775,776,777,778,779 , 780, 781 , 782 , 783 , 784 , 785 , 786 , 787 , 2234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 789 , 790 , 791 , 792 , 793 , 794 , 795 , 796 , 797 , 798 , 799 , 800 , 801 , 802 , 803 , 804 , 805 , 806 , 807,808 , 809 , 810 , 811 , 812 , 813 , 814 , 815 , 816, 817 , 818 , 819 , 820 , 821 , 822 , 823 , 824 , 825 , 826 , 827 , 828 , 829 , 830 , 831 , 832 , 833 , 834 , 835 , 836 , 837, 838 , 839 , 840 , 841 , 842 , 843,844 , 845 , 846 , 847 , 848 , 849 , 850 , 851 , 852 , 853 , 854 , 855 , 856 , 857 , 858 , 859. 860 , 861 , 862 , 863. 864 , 865 , 866 , 867 , 868 , 859 , 870 , 871 , 872 , 873 , 874 , 875 , 876,877,878,879,880,881 , 882 , 883 , 884 , 885 , 886, 887 , 888 , 889 , 890 , 891 , 892 , 893 , 894,895 , 896 , 897 , 898 , 899 , 900 , 901 , 902 , 903 , 904 , 905 , 906, 907 , 908 , 909 , 910 , 911 、 912 , 913 , 914 , 915 , 916 , 917. 918 , 919 , 920 , 921 , 922 , 923 , 924 , 925 , 926 , 927 , 928 , 929 , 930 , 931 , 932 , 933 , 934 , 935 , 936 , 937 , 938 , 939 , 940 , 941 , 942, 943 , 944, 945 , 946, 947 , 948 , 949 , 950 , 951 , 952 , 953 , 954 , 955 , 956 , 857 , 958 , 959 , 960 , 961 , 962 , 963 , 964 , 965 , 966. 967 , 968 , 969 , 970 , 971 , 972 , 973 , 974 , 975 , 976 , 977 , 978 , 979 , 980 , 981 , 982 , 983 , 984 , 985 , 986 , 987, 988 , 989 , 990 , 991 , 992 , 993 , 994 , 995 , 996 , 997 , 998 , 999 , 1000 , 1001 , 1002 , 1003 , 1004. 1005 , 1006 , 1007 , 1008 , 1009 , 1010 , 1011 , 1012 , 1013 , 1014 , 1015、1016,1017 , 1018. 1019 , 1020, 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024 , 1025 , 1026, 1027 , 1028 , 1029 , 1030 , 1031 , 1032、1033 , 1034 , 1035 , 1036, 1037 , 1038 , 1039 , 1040 , 1041 , 1042 , 1043 , 1044 , 1045 , 1046 , 1047 , 1048. 1049 , 1050 , 1051 , 1052 , 1053 , 1054 , 1055 , 1056 (P ) , 1057. 1058 , 1059 , 1060、1061 , 1062 , 1063 , 1064 , 1065 , 1066, 1067 , 1068 , 1069 , 1070, 1071,1072、1073 , 1074 , 1075 , 1076 , 1077 , 1078 , 1079 , 1080 , 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084 , 1085. 1086. 1087 , 1088 , 1089 , 1090 , 1091 , 1092 , 1093 , 1094 , 1095 , 1096 , 1097 , 1098 . 1099 , 1100 , 1101 , 1102 , 1103 , 1104 , 1105 .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Garidih Thana No.9 P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

1 ( P ) . 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7, 8 , 9 , 10( P) , 11 ( P) , 15 (P ) , 17(P) , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22( P) , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51, 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57, 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74, 75.76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87, 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112, 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128, 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 . 135 , 136 , 137,138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144, 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162, 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182, 183 , 184, 185 , 186 , 187, 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200, 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 . 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 、 226. 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244.245 , 246, 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262. 263. 264. 265. 266. 267. 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280, 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285. 286 , 287, 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315 、 316 , 317 , 318,319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326 , 327 , 328、329、330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334, 335 , 336.337,338,339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352, 353 , 354,355,356,357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370.371.372,373,374,375,376、377 . 378. 379 , 380 , 381,382 , 383 , 384 , 385,386 , 387 . 388. 389. 390. 391. 392. 393,394,395,396 , 397, 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402, 403 , 404 , 405 . 406.407,408 , 409、410、411 , 412 , 413 , 414 , 415、416,417 , 418 , 419 , 420, 421 , 422 , 423 .

1 2235 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

424, 425 , 426 , 427 , 428, 429, 430, 431 , 432, 433 , 434, 435 , 436, 437, 438, 439 , 440 , 441 , 442, 443 , 444 , 445 , 446, 447 , 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457, 458 , 459 , 460, 461 , 462, 463 , 464 , 465, 466 , 467, 468 , 469, 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474, 475 , 476, 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 , 485 , 486, 487 , 488 , 489 , 490, 491 , 492 , 493 , 494, 495, 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504, 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510, 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532, 533 , 534 , 535 , 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 , 543 , 544 , 545 , 546 , 547, 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554, 555 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574 , 575 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596, 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604, 605, 606 , 607, 608 , 609 , 610, 611 , 612, 613 , 614, 615 , 616 , 617, 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622, 623 , 624, 625 , 626, 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 636, 637 , 638 , 639, 640, 641 , 642 , 643 , 644, 645 , 646 , 647 , 648, 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654, 655 , 656, 657, 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664, 665 , 666 , 667, 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682, 683 , 684, 685 , 686 , 687, 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694, 695 , 696 , 697, 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 ( P) , 702 (P) , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710,711 , 712 , 713 ( P ) , 714(P) , 716(P) , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 (P) , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724, 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732 , 733 , 734 , 735 , 736, 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741 , 742 , 743 , 744, 745 , 746 , 747, 748, 749, 750, 751 , 752 , 753 , 754 , 755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 (P ) , 772 , 773 , 774 , 775( P) , 777 (P ) , 778 ( P) , 780 (P ) , 781 (P) , 782 (P) , 783 , 784 , 785( P) , 787 (P ) , 788 , 789 , 790(P) , 791 ( P ) , 795 (P) , 796 (P ) , 797 , 798 (P ) , 799 (P) , 800( P) , 805 (P ) .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Piperjoria Thana No.10

P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

12( P) , 13 ( P ) , 26(P) , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ( P) , 32( P) , 34( P) , 36( P) , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45 , 46, 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ( P) , 52 (P) , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57, 58 , 59, 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80, 81 , 82 , 83 , 84, 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90, 91 , 92 , 93 , 94, 95 , 96, 97 , 98 , 99, 100 , 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105 , 106, 107, 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119, 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127, 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139, 140, 141 , 142 , 143 , 144, 145 , 146, 147, 148 , 149, 150, 151 , 152 , 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164, 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176, 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182, 183 , 184 , 185 , 186, 187(P) , 188 (P) , 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193 (P) , 194 ( P) , 195 (P ) , 207 , 221 ( P ) , 223 ( P ) , 224 ( P ) , 234 (P) , 235 ( P ) , 236 (P ) , 237 , 238 , 239, 240 , 241 , 242(P) , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246, 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 ( P ) , 261, 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286, 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302, 303 , 304, 305, 306, 307, 308 , 309 , 310, 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322, 323 , 324 , 325 , 326, 327 , 328 , 329 , 330, 331 , 332 , 333, 334, 335 , 336 , 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345 , 346 , 347, 348 , 349 , 350, 351, 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364, 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370, 371 , 372 , 373 , 374, 375 , 376 .

565 G1/05-31 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5,2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

2236

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Mirchaitari , Thana No.11

P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

11 ( P) , 12 (P) , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19, 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26, 27 , 28 , 29 , 30, 31 , 32 ( P ) , 52 ( P ) , 53 ( P) , 54( P) , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ( P) , 66 (P) , 67, 68 , 69 , 70. 71 (P) , 72 (P ) , 75 , 76 (P ) , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80, 81 , 82, 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106, 107 , 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115 , 116 , 117, 118 , 119 , 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147, 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162, 163, 164, 165 , 166, 167 , 168 , 169, 170, 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177, 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182, 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 (P) , 209 (P) , 211 (P ) , 242 (P) , 243 (P) , 244 ( P ) , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254( P ) , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275, 276, 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282, 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287, 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297, 298 , 299 , 300, 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315, 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326, 327, 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335 , 336, 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345 , 346 , 347, 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354, 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380(P) , 381 ( P) , 382(P ) , 383 ( P) , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392, 393 , 394 , 395 , 396, 397, 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402, 403 , 404 , 405, 406, 407 , 408, 409, 410 , 411 , 412, 413 , 414 , 415 , 416, 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423, 424 , 425 , 426, 427 , 428 , 429, 430, 431 , 432 , 433 , 434, 435 , 436, 437, 438 , 439 , 440 , 441 , 442, 443 , 444 , 445 , 446, 447 , 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456, 457, 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462, 463 , 464 , 465 , 466, 467, 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472, 473 , 474, 475, 476 , 477 , 478 , 479, 480, 481 , 482, 483 , 484 , 485 , 486( P) , 487 , 488 , 489 , 490, 491 , 492 , 493 , 494, 495 , 496 , 497, 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502, 503 , 504, 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512, 513 , 514 , 515 , 516, 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530. 531 , 532 ( P) , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536( P) , 537 ( P ) , 538 (P) , 539 ( P ) , 540 (P ) , 541 (P ) , 542 (P) , 543(P) .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Pokhoria , Thana No.12

P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

49 ( P ) , 50 ( P ) , 51 ( P ) , 56 , 57( P ) , 58 ( P) , 59( P) , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69, 70 , 71 , 72, 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 ( P ) , 92 , 93 ( P ) , 94 ( P ) , 95 (P ) , 96, 97 , 98 , 99 , 100, 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105, 106 , 107, 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119, 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125 , 126 , 127, 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134 , 135 , 136, 137,138 , 139, 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146, 147 , 148 , 149, 150, 151 , 152, 153 , 154 , 155 , 156, 157 , 158 , 159 , 160, 161 , 162, 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170, 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179, 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186, 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196, 197, 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204( P) , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224, 225 , 226 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229(P ) , 230 , 231 ( P) , 232 (P ) , 234 ( P ) , 241 ( P) , 242 ( P) , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246, 247 , 248, 249 , 250, 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 2237 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/ फाल्गुन 14,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264, 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276, 277 , 278 , 279 , 280, 281 , 282, 283 , 284, 285 , 286 , 287, 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292, 293 , 294, 295 , 296, 297 , 298 , 299, 300, 301 (P) , 302(P) , 303 (P) , 304(P) , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310, 311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315 , 316, 317, 318 , 319, 320, 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 (P) , 329 (P) , 334(P) , 335( P) , 336( P) , 337, 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 (P) , 351 ( P) , 352 , 353 , 354( P) , 388 ( P) .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Kherasole Thana No.13 P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

60(P ) , 61 (P) , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 (P) , 73 ( P) , 83 ( P) , 85( P) , 86 , 87 ( P ) , 88 , 89(P ) , 93 ( P ) , 94( P) , 95 , 96, 97 , 98 , 99(P) , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104, 105, 106, 107 , 108 , 109 , 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119, 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124, 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137,138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142, 143 , 144 , 145 , 146, 147, 148, 149 , 150, 151 , 152, 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159, 160, 161 , 162, 163 , 164 , 165 , 166, 167, 168, 169 , 170 , 171 , 172, 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182, 183 , 184, 185, 186, 187 , 188 , 189 , 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202, 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207, 208 , 209, 210, 211 , 212 , 213 , 214, 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232, 233 , 234 , 235, 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240, 241 , 242, 243 , 244, 245 , 246, 247 , 248 , 249, 250, 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268 , 269 , 270, 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276, 277 , 278 , 279 , 280, 281 , 282 , 283 , 284, 285 , 286, 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292, 293, 294 , 295 , 296, 297, 298 , 299, 300, 301 , 302 , 303 , 304, 305 , 306, 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322, 323 , 324 , 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330, 331 , 332( P) , 333 ( P) , 334(P) , 335 , 336 , 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 ; 344, 345 , 346 , 347, 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 , 356, 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367, 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380, 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389, 390, 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408 , 409, 410, 411 , 412 , 413 , 414(P) , 415 , 416 , 417 , 418, 419 , 420, 421, 422, 423 , 424 , 425, 426, 427 , 428, 429 , 430, 431 , 432 , 433 , 434, 435 , 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441 , 442, 443, 444, 445 , 446, 447, 448, 449, 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454, 455, 456, 457, 458 , 459, 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466, 467 , 468 , 469, 470 , 471 , 472, 473 , 474, 475, 476, 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 . 484 , 485 , 486 , 487, 488 , 489, 490, 491 , 492 , 493 (P) , 494 (P) , 496 (P) , 498 (P) , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504, 505 , 506(P ) , 507 ( P) , 508 ( P) , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512, 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 ( P) , 522 (P ) , 523 , 524, 525 , 526, 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532, 533 , 534 , 535 , 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540, 541 , 542 (P ) , 543 (P ), 544 (P) , 577 (P) , 578 , 579 . 580 (P ) , 581 , 582 , 583 (P ) , 584 (P) , 598 (P ), 600 ( P), 614( P), 615 (P) , 682 (P) , 683 (P) , 684 , 685 , 686. 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696, 697 , 698 , 699 , 700, 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712(P ), 713 (P) , 714 , 715 (P) , 732(P) , 733 , 734 , 735 , 736 , 737 (P) , 738 ( P) , 740(P) , 741 , 742 (P) , 743 (P ) , 748(P) , 749 (P) , 795( P) , 796(P) , 797( P) .

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2238

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Bara Dhamni Thana No.7

P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

1 , 2, 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12, 13 , 14 , 15 , 16, 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22, 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47, 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57, 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82, 83 , 84 ( P) , 85 (P) , 86 (P) , 87 (P ) , 88 (P ) , 89 ( P ) , 91 (P) , 92, 93 , 94, 95 (P) , 96 (P) , 97 ( P) , 98 (P ) , 297 ( P ) , 298 , 299 ( P) , 305 ( P ) , 306 , 307 (P ) , 310 (P) , 311 (P) , 312 ( P) , 313 ( P) , 314( P) , 315 , 316 , 317, 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322, 323 , 324, 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331、332、333 , 334 , 335 , 336 , 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346, 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355, 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364, 365 , 366, 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382, 383 , 384 , 385 ( P) , 386( P) , 388 (P ) , 389 (P ) , 390( P ) , 393 (P) , 394 ( P) . 395 ( P ) , 397 (P ) , 398 ( P ) , 399( P ) , 445 ( P) , 446 , 447, 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457 , 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462, 463 , 464 , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469 , 470( P) , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 477 ( P ) , 478 ( P ) , 504 ( P) .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Mako Madgi Thana No.16 P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

16(P) & 19(P) .

Block No. 2

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Jordiha Thana No.1

P.S. Littipara Dist . Pakur

1 ( P ) . 2 ( P ) .3 ( P ) , 4 (p ) , 5 ( P ) , 6 ( p ) . 7(P) , 8 , 9 , 10(P) , 11 (p) , 12, 13 , 14, 15 , 16, 17, 18 , 19 , 20, 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27, 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34(p ) , 35 ( p ) , 36(p) , 37 ( p) , 38 (p ) , 39 , 40 , 41, 42, 43 ,44, 45 , 46 (p ) . 47 (p) , 52 ( p) , 53 ( p ) , 57 (p ) , 58 (p ) , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78, 79, 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104, 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112, 113 , 114、115、116 , 117, 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142, 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 、 147、148、149 , 150 , 151 , 152、153、154、155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185, 186 , 187, 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196, 197, 198 , 199 , 200 , 201, 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 . 219 , 220 , 221、222、223、224、225、226、227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239、240、241、242、243、244、245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263、264、265 , 266, 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273,274,275、276、277、278,279 , 280 , 281 , 282,283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291. 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302, 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309,310,311,312,313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319, 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326 , 327. 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334, 335, 336 , 337,338,339,340,341,342,343,344 、

1 2239 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

345, 346 , 347 , 348 , 349, 350, 351 , 352, 353 , 354 , 355 , 356, 357, 358 , 359, 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384, 385 , 386 , 387, 388 , 389 , 390, 391 , 392, 393 , 394, 395 , 396, 397 , 398 , 399, 400, 401 , 402, 403 , 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409 , 410 , 411 , 412 , 413 , 414, 415 , 416, 417 , 418 , 419, 420 , 421 , 422 , 423 , 424 , 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432 , 433 , 434, 435 , 436, 437 , 438 , 439 , 440, 441 , 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448 , 449, 450 , 451 , 452 , 453, 454, 455 , 456, 457, 458, 459 , 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464, 465 , 466, 467, 468 , 469, 470 , 471 , 472, 473 , 474, 475 , 476 , 477 ( p ) , 481 ( p ) , 482 (P) , 483 ( p) , 484 , 485 , 486 (p ) , 487 (p ) , 489(p) ,490,491,492,493 ( p ) , 515 ( p ) , 516,517,518,518,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,52 548 , 8,529,530,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,540,541,542,543,544,545,546,547 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574 , 575 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589, 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596, 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605, 606 , 607 , 608 , 609 , 610, 611 , 612 , 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622, 623 , 624 , 625 , 626, 627, 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 636 , 637, 638 , 639, 640, 641 , 642, 643 , 644, 645, 646, 647 ,648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662, 663 , 664, 665 , 666, 667 , 668 , 669 , 670. 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682, 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700, 701 , 702, 703 , 704, 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717, 718 , 719 , 720, 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732 , 733 , 734 , 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740, 741 , 742, 743, 744 , 745 , 746, 747, 748 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752 , 753 , 754 , 755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 , 772 , 773 , 774 , 775 , 776 , 777 , 778 , 779 , 780 , 781 , 782 , 783,784,785,786,787,788,789,790,791,792,793,794,795,796,797,798( p ) , 803,804,805,806 ,808, 810,813 ( p ) , 814,815,816,818,819,820,821 .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Chota Murjora Thana No.2 P.S. Littipara Dist . Pakur

1 ( P ) , 11 (P ) , 12( P) . 13 ( P) , 14( P) , 16( P) , 17( P ) , 18( P) , 19( P) , 20( P) , 46 (P ) , 47 (P) , 51 (P ) , 59 ( P ) , 60 ( P ) , 61 ( P ) , 62 ( P) , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66, 67 , 68 , 69, 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82, 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 (P ) , 101 ( P) , 102(P) , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107, 108 , 109 , 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 ( P) , 124( P) , 125 (P ) , 126 ( P) , 127 , 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139, 140 , 141 , 142, 143 , 144 , 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154 , 155 , 156, 157 , 158 , 159 , 160, 161 , 162, 163 , 164, 165 , 166, 167 , 168, 169 , 170, 171 , 172 , 173 (P) , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 ( P) , 178( P) , 179( P) , 180 (P) , 181 (P ) , 182 (P ) , 183 ( P ) , 184 (P ) , 185 ( P ) , 186( P ) , 187(P) , 188 (P) , 189 , 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194 , 195 , 196, 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212, 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246, 247, 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264, 265 , 266, 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300, 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307, 308 , 309 , 310, 311 , 312, 313 , 314, 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 2240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

[ PART II- SC 3 ( ii ) ] 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332, 333 , 334 , 335 , 336 , 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342, 343, 344, 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , .374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379,380,381,382 , 383 , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387, 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396, 397,398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404, 405, 406, 407, 408 , 409, 410, 411 , 412 , 413 , 414 , 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423 , 424 , 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432 , 433,434. 435, 436, 437, 438 , 439, 440, 441 , 442, 443 , 444, 445, 446, 447 , 448 , 449, 450 . 451 , 452, 453,454,455 , 456, 457, 458 , 459, 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469,470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483,484 , 485 , 486 , 487, 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492, 493 , 494, 495, 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501,502 , 503 , 504. 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523,524 , 525 , 526,527,528,529,530,531 , 532 , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540 , 541. 542 , 543 , 544 , 545 , 546, 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554,555,556,557,558 , 559,560 , 561. 562, 563 , 564 , 565 , 566, 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573,574,575,576 , 577, 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596 , 597, 598 , 599, 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604, 605 , 606, 607 , 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612 , 613,614, 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624 , 625 , 626 , 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 636 , 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644 , 645 , 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663,664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670. 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681,682 , 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694, 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699, 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723,724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732, 733 , 734 , 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741,742,743,744,745,746,747 , 748 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752,753,754,755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 , 772 , 773,774 , 775,776,777 , 778 , 779 , 780 , 781 , 782 , 783 , 784 , 785 , 786 , 787 , 788 , 789 .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Bara Murjora Thana No.3

P.S. Littipara Dist . Pakur

2 (P ) , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7( P ) , 8 (P ) , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12, 13( P) , 14( P) , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18(P) , 21 ( P) , 22 , 23 , 24, 25. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ( P) , 30 , 31 ( P) , 35 ( P) , 36( P) , 37 ( P ) , 56 ( P) , 57 (P ) , 58 (P ) , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62, 63. 64 , 65 , 66 ( P ) , 68 ( P) , 69 ( P) , 70 , 71 , 72, 73 , 74 , 75 , 76, 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ( P ) , 92 ( P ) , 93 ( P ) , 94 ( P) , 95 (P ) , 96 , 97 , 98 ( P) , 99 (P ) , 100 ( P) , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142, 143 , 144 , 145 , 146, 147, 148 , 149 , 150, 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156, 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162, 163 , 164 , 165 , 166, 167 , 168 , 169, 170, 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180, 181 , 182, 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194, 195, 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217, 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232. 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254、255、256、257、258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270( P ) , 271 ( P ) , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282, 283 , 284. 285 , 286, 287, 288 , 292 ( P ) , 293 ( P) , 294( P) , 300 ( P) , 313 ( P) , 316 ( P) , 317 ( P) , 318, 319 , 320. 321 ( P) , 326 ( P) , 327 ( P ) , 328 (P ) , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332, 333 , 334, 335 , 336 , 337 , 2241

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

338, 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345 , 346 , 347 , 348, 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 (P ) , 356 ( P) , 359 ( P) , 360, 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376, 377 , 378 , 379, 380 , 381 , 382, 383 , 384, 385 , 386 , 387, 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392, 393 , 394, 395 , 396, 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 401 ( P), 410 ( P ) , 411 (P) , 412 , 413 , 414 , 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 422 ( P ) , 423 (P ) , P) , 425 ( P ) , 432 ( P) , 449 ( P ) , 450 ( P) , 451 , 452 , 453 (P) , 454 ( P) , 455 ( P) , 456 , 457, 458 , 459 (P) , 460( P) , 464 (P) , 465 , 466 , 467, 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472, 473, 474, 475 , 476, 477, 478 , 479 , 480, 481 , 482, 483 , 484 , 485 , 486, 487 , 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 494 , 495 , 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526, 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534, 535 , 536, 537 , 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 , 543 , 544, 545 , 546 , 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 556, 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562, 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 ( P) , 568 ( P) , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574 , 575 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596, 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607, 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612 , 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624 , 625 , 626 , 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 636, 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644, 645 , 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672, 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682, 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732 , 733 , 734 , 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740, 741 , 742 , 743 , 744, 745 , 746 , 747, 748 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752, 753 , 754 , 755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770(P) , 771 , 772 , 773 ( P) , 774( P) , 778 ( P) , 786 ( P) , 787( P) , 790( P) , 791 , 792 , 793 , 794 , 795 , 796 , 797 , 798 , 799 , 800 , 801 , 802 , 803 , 804 , 805 , 806 , 807 , 808 , 809 , 810 , 811 , 812 , 813 , 814 , 815 , 816 , 817 , 818 , 819 , 820 , 821 , 822 ( P ) , 823 ( P ) , 824( P) , 825 ( P) , 826 , 827 ( P ) , 828 ( P ) , 829 , 830 , 831 ( P) , 907 ( P ) , 915 ( P) , 916 (P ) , 917(P) , 918 , 919, 920 , 921 , 922 ( P ).

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Simlong Thana No.4 , P.S. Littipara Dist . Pakur

8 ( P) , 9 ( P ) , 10(P) , 11,12( P) , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16, 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22, 23 , 24 , 25, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33 , 34 ( P) , 35( P) , 36 , 37 ( P) , 39 ( P) , 40( P) , 44(P) , 45 (P) , 46 , 47 , 48 (P ) , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56, 57 , 58 ( P) , 59 (P ) , 60( P) , 61 , 62, 63 , 64 , 65 , 66, 67 , 68 ( P) , 69 ( P) , 71 ( P ) , 72 ( P ) , 73 , 74(P) , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 (P ) , 79 (P ) , 80 (P ) , 82 ( P) , 92( P) , 93 ( P) , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 (P ) , 126( P) , 127(P ) , 128 (P), 129 (P) , 130( P) , 131 (P) , 132 (P) , 174 (P ) , 200(P) , 201 ( P), 209 ( P) , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 ( P) , 220 ( P) , 221 ( P) , 226 ( P ) , 227( P) , 233 ( P) , 234 , 235 , 236, 237 , 238 , 239, 240 , 241 , 242, 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 (P) , 248( P) , 249(P) , 250, 251 , 252 , 253 ( P) , 255 ( P) , 256( P) , 258 , 259 , 260, 261 , 262 , 263 (P ) , 264 ( P ) , 265 (P ) , 266 (P ) , 276 ( P) , 277 , 278 (P ) , 279 (P ) , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 ( P) , 287 (P) , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 ( P) , 303 (P) , 304, 305 , 306 , 307 ( P) , 308 (P) , 309(P) , 310 , 311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315, 316, 317( P) , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 ( P) , 322 (P ) , 325 ( P) , 331 ( P) , 332 , 333 (P) , 334, 335, 336, 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346, 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 , 356, 357( P) , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385 , 386 , 387, 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400(P ) , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404 , 405 , 406, 407, 408 , 409, 410, 411 , 412 , 413 , 414, 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 2242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423 , 424, 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432 , 433 , 434, 435 , 436 (P) . 437 (P ) , 438 (P) , 439( P) , 440 , 441 , 442, 443 , 444(P) , 449(P) , 450, 451 , 452 (P ) , 462( P ) , 463 ( P) , 464( P) , 465 , 466 , 467 , 468 , 469, 470 , 471 , 472, 473 , 474( P) . Plots to be acquired in Mouza Amarbhita Thana No.7 P.S. Littipara Dist . Pakur 1 ( P) , 112( P) , 113 (P) .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Bansbhita Thana No.8 P.S. Littipara Dist . Pakur

1 ( P ), 2 , 3 , 4 (P) , 5 ( P) , 7( P) , 8 ( P) , 9 ( P ) , 68 ( P ) , 69 (P) , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86, 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107, 108 , 109, 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119, 120, 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134( P) , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142, 143 , 144, 145, 146, 147, 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160, 161 , 162, 163 , 164 , 165, 166, 167, 168 , 169, 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177, 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187( P) , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 ( P ) , 197 (P) , 198 ( P) , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Margo Thana No.9 P.S. Littipara Dist . Pakur

1. 2. 3. 4. 5 , 6 , 7 ( P ) , 9( P) , 15( P ) , 16 ( P ) , 17 , 18 (P) , 101 ( P) , 102( P) , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Chota Chatkam Thana No.10 P.S. Littipara Dist . Pakur

352 ( P ) , 355 , 356 , 357,358 , 359 , 360, 361 , 362 , 363 , 364, 365 , 366 , 367, 368 , 369 , 370 , 371.372.373、374、375、376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385,386,387 , 388 ( P ) , 389 ( P ) , 402 ( P) . 403 ( P ) .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Dhoupahar Thana No.26 P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

1 ( P) . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22、23、24、25、26 、 27( P ) , 28 , 29 , 30 ( P ) , 31 , 32 , 33 ( P ) , 34( P ) . 35 ( P) , 36 ( P) , 37( P) , 38 ( P) , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42, 43 . 44. 45. 46 ( P) . 47 ( P ) . 48 ( P ) , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 . 65 , 66 , 67( P ) . 68. 69 ( P ) , 74 ( P ) . 75 ( P ) . 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 (P) , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 ( P) , 94 ( P) . 95. 96 ( P ) , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ( P ) .

Plots to be acquired in Mouza Ladapathar Thana No.27 P.S. Sundarpahari Dist . Godda

3 ( P ) . 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10, 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46, 47 , 48 , 49, 50 , 51 , 52. 53. 54. 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64, 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ,

1 2243

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

ग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87, 88 , 89, 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94, 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102, 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110, 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122, 123 , 124 , 125 , 126, 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 (P) , 133 (P) , 134(P) , 135 , 136 , 137,138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142, 143, 144, 145 , 146, 147 , 148(P) , 150 (P ) , 151 ( P) , 156 (P) , 161 , 162, 163 , 164 , 165(P) , 166 (P), 246 ( P) , 247 (P), 248 (P) , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255, 256, 257 (P) , 258 (P ) , 259( P) , 260 (P) , 261 (P) , 286 , 287, 288 , 289 , 290, 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296, 297 , 299, 300, 310(P) .

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION ( BLOCK - 1 ) ( A1 - A18 . )

A1 - A2 : Line starting from point Al in mouza Chota Puro No. 8 of P.S. Sundar Pahari.- Dist . Godda , Jharkhand Plot No. 221 and passing through the Plot No. 210 , 209 , 261,262,267,268 & 153 meeting at point A2 in the Eastern Boundary of Plot No. 158 in Mouza Chota Puro No. 8 .

A2 - A3 : Line starting from point A2 in Mouza Chota Puro No. 8 and passing through Plot No.158 , 157,156 and Plot No.1 & 2 and meeting at point A3 in Plot No.1 of Chota Puro No. 8 .

A3 -A4 : Line starting from point A3 in plot no . 1 of Chota Puro No. 8 and passing through plot no . 3,4,7,6 , 11 and meeting at point A4 in plot no . 11 of Chota puro no 8 .

A4- A5 : Line starting from point A4 in plot no . 11 of Mouza Chota puro no . 8 and passing through plot no.20 and crossing the common Boundary line of Mouza Chota Puro no . 8 and Garidih No. 9 and passing through Plot no . 22 , 21 , 17, 15 , 10 , 11 and 1 of Mouza Garidih no. 9 and entering in the common boundary line of mouza Piparjoria no.10 and Garidih no . 9 and passing through plot no . 24, 26 , 31 , 32, 34 , 36, 13 , 51 , 52, 193 , 194 , 195, 198 , 188 , 187 , 235 , 236 , 242 and meeting at point A5 in plot no . 242 of Mouza Piparjoria no . 10 .

A5 -A6 Line starting from point A5 in Mouza Piparjoria no . 10 plot no . 242 and passing through plot no.243,223,260,221 and entering in the common boundary line of Mouza Piparjoria no.10 and Marchaitari no.11 and passing through plot no.11 , 12, 75 , 76 , 72 , 71 , 67 , 66 , 65 , 53 , 52 , 54 , 209, 208 , 211 , 243, 242 and meeting at point A6 in plot no. 254 of Mouza Marchaitari no . 11.

A6 - A7 : Line starting from pont A6 in Mouza Marchaitari no . 11 plot no . 254 and entering in the common boundary line of Mouza Pokharia no.12 and Marchatari no.11 and passing through plot no . 243 , 242 , 241 , 234, 232 , 231 , 229,230 , 59,60 , 58 , 57 , 55 , 51 , 50 , 49 , 91 , 93 and meeting at point A7 in Southern boundary of plot no.94 in Mouza Pokharia no.12.

565 G1/05-32 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] 2244

A7 -A8 : - Line starting from point A7 in Mouza Pokharia no . 12 passing from plot no . 94, 95, and entering in the common boundary line of Mouza Kherasol no . 13 and Pokharia No. 12 passing through plot no . 85,87 , 89 , 99 , 93 , 94 , 83 , 73,72 , 60,63 , 61 , 64 , 542,543 , 544 , 577 , 580 , 584,583 , 597 and meeting at point A8 in plot no.531 of Mouza Kherasol no 13 .

A8 - A9 : - Line starting from point A8 in Mouza Kherasol no . 15 riot no. 531 and passing through plot no . 598 , 614, 522, 521 , 615 , 508 , 507 , 506 , 630 , 498 , 496, 494 , 493 , 683 , 682, 715 , 713 , 712, 731,732, 738 , 740 , 749 , 748 and meeting at point A9 in plot no . 748 .

A9 - A10 : - Line starting from point A9 in plot no . 748 in Mouza Kherasol no . 13 and passing through plot no . 742,737,743,755 and crossing the Western Bank of Gumani River and meeting at point A10 in plot no . 795 of Mouza Kherasol no.13.

A10 -A11 : - Line starting from point A10 in Gumani River plot no.795 of Mouza Kherasol no. 13 and passing through plot no. 795,796 and crossing the Western Bank of Gumani River and entering in plot no . 414 and passing through plot no.334, 333 , 332 and again crossing the Gumani river and passing through plot no . 124. Gumani river and meeting at point A11 .

A11 - A12: Line starting from point All plot no . 124 of Gumani river Mouza Kherasol no . 13 and passing through common boundary line and Eastern Bank of Gumani river and Chota Murjora no . 2 and passing through plot no . 46 , 47 , 20, 19 , 18 , 17 , 16 , 14, 15,13 , 12, 11 and crossing the common boundary line of Eastern Bank of Gumani river and Mouza Chota Murrjora no . 2 and passing through Gumani river and meeting at point A12 in plot no . 388 .

A12-A13 : - Line starting from point A12 and passing through plot no . 301 , 302 , 303 、 304,329 , 328 , 334, 335 , 336 , 341 , 351 , 354 and entering in common boundary of mouza -- Pokharia No.12 and Mirchaitari No. 11 and passing through plot No. 485. 486. 543 , 542, 541 , 540 , 539 , 538 , 537 , 536 and crossing through the Western Bank of Gumani river in plot no . 532 and meeting at point A13 .

A13 - A14 : - Line starting from point A13 in Gumani river Mouza Marchaitari no.11 and passing through plot no.532 of Gumani river and crossing the Western Bank ofGumani river passing through the plot no . 382 , 383 , 380,381 and meeting at point A14 common boundary line of Mouza Marchaitari 11 and Piparjoria no . 10.

A14 - A15 : Line starting from point A14 entering in Mouza Garidih No. 9 passing through plot no . 667 , 668 , 669,805 crossing the plot no . 669 and passing through plot no.701 , 702 , 714 , 713 , 716 , 720 , 721 , 669、798 . 796 , 795 , 791 , 790 , 787 , 785. 782 , 781,780 , 778 , 777 , 775 , 771 and passing through the 2245 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

common boudary of Mouza Garidih no . 9 and Bara Dhamni no . 7 and passing through plot no . 87 , 89 , 91 , 95 , 96, 97, 98 , 85 and meeting at point A15 Mouza Bara Dhamni no . 7 .

A15 - A16 : - Line starting from point A15 in plot no.84 Mouza Bara Dhamani no . 7 and passing through the Northen Boundary of plot no . 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 and passing through plot no . 318 , 239, 314, 313 , 312 , 311 , 310, 307, 305 , 304 , 303 , 301 , 299 , 297 , 385 , 386, 388 , 389, 390, 393 , 394,395 , 397 , 398 , 399,375 , 445, 504 and meeting at point A16 of Mouza Bara Dhamani no.7 .

A16 - A17 : - Line starting from point A16 plot no . 504 of Bara Dhamani no . 7 and passing through plot no 504 and meeting at point A17 .

A17 -A18 : - Line starting from point A17 of Mouza Bara Dhamani no.7 passing through plot no . 504, 470 , 477 , 478 and enterign common boundary line of Mouza Mako Madhgi no16 and passing through plot no . 19, 16 of Mouza Mako Madhgi no 16 and passing, through common boundary line of Chota Puro no . 8 and Mako Madhgi no 16 and meeting at point A18 in plot no . 1056 of Chota Puro no.8 .

A18 -A1 : Line starting from point A18 plot no . 1056 of Mouza Chota Puro no . 8nad passing through plot no . 215 , 213 , and meeting at point Al in plot no.221 of Mouza Chota Puro no . 8 at P.S. Sunder Paharhi , Dist. - Godda .

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION OF BLOCK -2 ( B1 - B27)

B1 - B2 : Line starting from point B1 mouza Bara Dhamni No - 7 , P.S. Sunderpahari , Dist . Godda, Plot No 100 passing through plot no 100 , 101 , 102, 103 and crossing the Eastern Bank of Gumani River and passing through Plot No 1175 and crossing the Southern Boundary of plot no 1161 , 1162 , 1165 and crossing the Southern Bank of Gumani River and entering in Mouza Jordiha No - 1 , Passing through plot no 813 , 496, 489 , 493 and meeting at point B2 in plct no 489 of Mouza Jordiha no - 1 , P.S. - Littipara, dist . Pakur.

B2-B3 : - Line starting from point B2 in plot no 489 Mouza Jordiha No - 1 and passing through plot no 487, 486 , 485 , 482, 481 , 480, 477 , 515 and meeting at point B3 in plot no.515 of Mouza Jordiha no- 1 .

B3 - B4 : Line starting from point B3 plot no 515 Mouza Jordiha No- 1 and passing through plot no - 515 , 798 and crossing the common Boundry line of Mouza Jordiha no - 1 and Chota Chatkam no - 10 and passing through Western Boundry of plot no 353 , 354 and passing through plot no 352 , 342, 403 , 402, 388 , 389 and passing through common boundary of Mouza Chota Chatkam no - 10 and Morgo no - 9 and passing through plot no . 7 , 8 , 9 , 16, 15 , 18 and meeting at point B4 in Mouza Margo no - 9 .

2246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . MARCH 5. 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] B4- B5 : Line starting from point B4 in Mouza Margo no.- 9 and passing through plot no . 102 , 101 , 1 and crossing the common boundary line of Mouza Margo no - 9 and Bansbhita no . 8 passing through plot no.187 , 191 and meeting at point B5 in Mouza Bansbhita no . - 8 .

B5 - B6 : Line starting from point B5 Mouza Bansbitha no - 8 passing through plot no - 205 , 68 passing through North East corner of plot no 25 and passing through plot no 9 , 8 , 4 , 5, 1 and crossing the common boundary line of Mouza Bansbitha no - 8 and Jordiha no - 1 and passing through plot no 807 of Jordiha no - 1 and meeting at point B6.

B6 - B7 : Line starting from point B6 in Mouza Jordiha N0-1 crossing the common boundary line of Mouza AmarBitha No - 7 and Jordiha No - 1 and passing through plot no 1 of Amarbitha no - 7 and meeting at point B7 .

B7 - B8 Line starting from B7 in Mouza Amarbitha no -7 , passing through plot no - 1 , Western Boundary of plot no - 111 . Passing through 112 , 113 and 1 , meeting at point B8 in Mouza Amarbitha no - 7.

B8 - B9 : - Line starting from point B8 in Mouza Amarbitha no - 7 , and entering in common boundary line of Mouza Bara Murjora no - 3 , and Amarbitha no . - 7 , passing through plot no - 922, 920 , 914,915,916,917 , 918 , 831 , 828 , 827, 825 , 824,823 , 822 , 790 , 787 , 786 , 778 , 770 , 773 , 774 , 432 , 567, 464, 460 , 459 and meeting at pointB9 in plot no -448 .

B9 - B10 : - Line starting from point B9 in plot no - 448 of Bara Murjora no - 3 , passing through plot no 455 , 454,453 , 450 , 425 , 424 , 423,422 , 410 , 411 , 401,359,355 , 356 and crossing the common boundary line of Mouza Simlong no -4 and Bara Murjora no - 3 , Passing through plot no 37, 38 , 39, 40, 35 , 34, 44.45 , 48. 69, 68 . 67, 72 , 71 and meeting at point B10.

B10 - B11: -Line starting from point B10 in plot no 74 of Mouza Simlong No - 4 . passing through plot no - 98,100 , 256 , 257 , 255 , 253 , 249 , 247 , 248 , 257 , 126, 127 . 128 , 132 , 131 , 174 and 432 meeting at point B11 in plot no 558 of Mouza Simlong no-4 .

B11 - B12: -Line starting from B11 in plot no 558 of Mouza Simlong no -4 and meeting at pointB12 in plot no 559 .

B12- B13 : -Line starting from point B12 in Mouza Simlong no - 4 , passing through plot no- 559 , 432, 174 , 132, 131,130, 129 , 128,257 , 248 , 247 meeting at point B13 .

B13 - B14: -Line starting from B13 plot no 247 of Mouza Simlong no - 4 , passing through plot no - 247 , 233、227、226、220 , 221 , 219 , 200 , 210,201 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 309 , 307 and meeting at point B14.

1 2247 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

B14- B15 : -Line starting from point B14 Mouza Simlong no - 4 , plot no -307 , passing through plot no - 308 , 303 , 301,333 , 486 , 483 , 491 , 493 , 496, 481 , 436 , 437 , 438 , 439 , 444, 448 , 449, 452, 464, 462,463 , 468, 474 , 543 , 400 , 615 and crossing the Lada River and meeting at common boundary of Mouza Simlong no - 4 and Lada Patahar no - 27 at point B15 .

B15 - B16 : -Line starting from B15 at common boundary point and passing through mouza Ladapathar no - 27 plot no - 167 , 166, 165 , 156 , 151 , 150, 148 , 134, 133 , 247 , 246, 248,257 , 258 , 259 , meeting at point B16 in plot no 261 .

B16 - B17 : -Line starting from point B16 plot no 261 of Mouza Lada Pathar no -27 and passing through plot no - 261 , 260 , 310 , 300 and passing throgh common boundary line of Mouza Lada Pathar no - 27 and Dhouphar no - 26 and passing through plot no- 262 , 67, 69 , 74 , 75 and meeting at point B17 in plot no 100 .

B17 - B18 : -Line starting from point B17 plot no 100 of Mouza Dhouphar No -26 and passing throgh plot no - 100, 96 , 94, 79 , 85 and meeting at point B18 .

B18 - B19 : -Line starting from point B18 the common boundary point of Mouza Dhouphar no - 26 and Southern Bank of Gumani River and passing through Gumani river and plot no 48 , 47 , 46, 37 , 36 , 38 , 35 , 34 , 33 , 30 , 27 , 26 , 1 of Mouza Dhouphar no - 26 and crossing the common boundary line of Mouza Ladapathar no - 27 and Dhouphar no - 26 and passing through Gumani River and meeting at point B19 on the Southern Bank of Gumani River plot no.3 of Ladapathar no.27 .

B19 - B20 : -Line starting from point B19 plot no - 3 of Ladapathar no - 27 and passing through the common boundary line of Mouza Simlong no -4 and Ladapathar no - 27 passing through plot no - 363 , 357 , 358,356, 331 , 321 , 322 , 317 , 280 , 279,278 , 276 , 286 , 287 , 265 , 264 , 263 , 92 , 93 , 78 , 79, 80 and meeting at point B20 in West corner of plot no - 60 in Mouza Simlong No - 4.

B20 - B21 : - Line starting from point B20 passing through plot no - 60 , 58 , 8 , 9 , 12 and entering in common boundary line of Mouza Bara Murjora No - 3 and Simlong No - 4 , passing through plot no - 326 , 327,328 , 321 , 317 and meeting at point B21 .

B21 - B22 : - Line starting from point B21 plot no - 317 of Mouza Bara Murjora no - 3 and passing through plot no - 316, 313 , 270 , 271 , 300 , 294, 293 , 292 , 288 and meeting at point B22 in Gumani River .

B22- B23 : - Line starting from Point B22 in Gumani River and crossing the common boundary line of Mouza Bara Murjora no -3 and Kherasol no - 13 and passing through plot no - 284 , 223 , 101 , 100 , 99 , 98 , 94, 95,93 , 92 , 84, 69 , 68 , 66 , 56 of Mouza Bara Murjora no - 3 and meeting in plot no.57 at point B23 .

2248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] B23 - B24 : - 3Line starting from point B23 in plot 57 of Mouza Bara Murjora No - 3 and passing through plot no - 58 , 29 , 42 , 37 , 36, 35 , 31 , 21 , 18,19, 14, 13 , 8 , 7 , 2 and entering the common boundary line of Mouza Chota Murjora no - 2 and Bara Muljora no - 3 and passing in plot no- 188 , 187 , 186, 185 , 184 , 183 , 182 , 181 , 180 , 179, 178 , 177 , 173 of Chota Murjora no - 2 , and passing through common boundary line of Mouza Chota Murjora no - 2 and Gumani River and passing through Gumani River plot no - 124 again crossing the common boundary line of Mouza Chota Murjora no - 2 and Gumani River and Meeting at point B24 in plot no - 125 of Mouza Chota Murjora no -2.

B24 - B25 : -Line starting from point B24 Mouza Chota Murjora no -2 plot no - 125 and passing through plot no - 126 , 125 , 120 , 123 , 102 , 101 , 100, 62 , 60 , 59 , 51 and meeting at point B25 in plot no -704 Mouza Chota Murjora no -2.

B25 - B26 : -Line starting from point B25 plot no - 704 of Chota Murjora No - 2 and passing through plot no - 704 and crossing the Common boundary line of Mouza Jordiha no - 1 and Chota Murjora No - 2 and passing through plot no - 820 , 51 , 262, 57 , 58 , 53 , 131 and meeting at point B26 in plot no-53 .

B26 - B27 : -Line starting from point B26 plot no- 53 of Mouza Jordiha no - 1 passing through plot no - 52 , 46, 47, 48 , 38 , 34, 35 , 36, 37 and meeting at point B27 on the Eastern corner of plot no - 2 .

B27 - B1 : - Line starting from point B27 in Mouza Jordiha no 1 plot no - 2 passing through plot no -3 , 4 , 5 , 6,7,10,11 , of Mouza Jordiha no - 1 and entering in common boundary line of Mouza Jordiha no - 1 and Garideh no - 9 and passing through Gumani River and crossing the common boundary line of Mouza Bara Dhamni no - 7 and Garideh no - 9 and meeting at point B1 in plot no - 100 of Bara Dhamni no - 7 P.S. Sunderpaharhi , Dist . - Godda .

[F. No. 43015/10/2002- PRIW ] B. K. PANDA, Director [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005 /फाल्गुन 14, 1926

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 7 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 794.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार कैण्टीन स्टोर्स डिपार्टमेन्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार , औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 84/95) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -14011 /3/94- आई. आर. (डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi , the 7th February , 2005 S.O. 794. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 84/95 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court No. 11. New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canteen Stores Department and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 7-2-05 .

[No. L - 14011 /3/94 - IR (DU ) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR , RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

I. D. No. 84/95

Shri R. N. Rai . Presiding officer. In the matter of :

Shri Sunder Pal Sharma and other . S'o Shri Jay Kishan Sharma , R / o 335 - C . Chhaju Colony . Oid Delhi , Gali Chanakaya Marg . Durga Puri Chowk , Delhi .

Versus

General Manager . Canteen Stores Department, Adelphi . Bombay- 400020 .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 14011 / 3 /94 - IR ( DU ) Central Governmentdt . 04-08-1995 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :

"Whether the action of the management of CSD in terminating of services of S / Shri Sunder Pal and Om Parkash , daily rated Mazdoor w.e.f. January .

2249 1989 and July , 1986 respectively is justified ? Ifnot , to what relief the workmen are entitled to ? " The workmen/ applicants have filed statement of claim but the statement of claim is not on the record . However . they have submitted their case on the basis of the matter agitated before the Labour Commissioner . There is claim case dt . 11-8-1995 and it has been stated thatthe respondents were requested to regularise the services of the workmen /applicants in the Canteen Stores Department . Delhi as done in the case of their casual labour number in three by the Area Depot Manager, Kirby Place, Delhi Cantt . Daily rated Mazdoors after rendering one year's continuous service in a department with not less than 240 days work in a year may acquire temporary status and they cannot be terminated without the issue of one month's notice or a months pay as these DRM's are governed under provision of ID Act , 1947. The above employees were employed in a Semi Commercial Deptt . under the Ministry of Defence and they are entitled to the protection of section 25 - F of the ID Act and the termination of their service after many years regular services as stated above without notice and without payment of terminal gratuity is illegal and they are entitled to reinstatement with back wages . They were being paid on muster roll and were admitted to CSD employees Provident Fund .

It has been further stated that it is reliably learnt thatall employees of various depots have been called for and were made regular after termination of the above named DRM's . The employees are industrial workers and arebeing paid on muster roll after having been sponsored by employment exchange . These workmen did not leave the services but their services were terminated by the department without any cause . Their names should be included in the list of seniority proposed by CSD Department . Delhi Cantonment and again alongwith other retrenched employees . AIR 1986 - SC - 584 . 1978 ( 1 ) SIR 349. AIR 1987- SC - 3342 , CWC No. 7707 of 1982 , Writ Petition No. 125 of 1987. 1988 ( 1 ) SLR - 351 - SC and several other cases of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and High Court have been cited in the so called statement of claim but no copy of the same has been supplied .

The management has filed written stateinent . In the written statement , the simple case of the management is thatthe employees have never been the regular employees of the respondent/ management against any of the vacant posts . They never worked for 240 days continuously . They have been casual daily rated labours . They are not entitled to any notice or pay in lieu of notice . Their services were never terminated . There was no work for them so Shri Sunder Pal and Shri Om Parkash were disengaged . They are not entitled for any relief under the doctrine of res judicata . Shri Sunder Pal Sharma filed an original application No. 53/90 against the General Manager . Canteen Stores Department , Bombay and Area Manager , CSD Department . Delhi with the same causes of action and the said application was disposed of by the CAT, Principal Bench . New Delhi on 5th of July, 1994. The Hon'ble CATdirected the respondents to consider the case of the applicants for regularisation in Group " D " class 2250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

when their turn comes in accordance with the seniority list prepared by the management/respondent.

It was further directed that they should also be given preference over the outsiders considering the fact that they worked in the department for some time earlier . This was decided on 5th of July , 1994. No casual labour who are junior to the workmen / applicants have been taken in service so their case of 25- G and 25 - H is not made out . The applicants have not come to the court with clean hands . They have already filed a case in the CAT but they got no relief as they were not regular employees and they were not on muster roll employees so they were not regularised. When they failed in the CAT, they have filed this case in this Tribunal . Shri Sunder Pal was engaged as casual labour , Delhi Department w.e.f. 23-6-1980 to June , 1989 and Shri Om Parkash was engaged from 11-09-1980 to July . 1986 but they are not regular employees and seniors to them have not been regularised . There is no vacancy for regularisation . No outsider has been taken into service .

The workmen/ applicants have filed rejoinder. They have stated the averments of their claim .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side of the workmen that they have worked for 7-8 years and they should have given preference over the outsiders when fresh appointments were made out the respondents have not done so . They have taken fresh hands and they have not regularised their services . It was submitted from the side of the workmen /applicants that in case the workmen/ applicants have any grievances , they should approach the CAT from where their original case No. OA 53/90 was decided on 5th of July , 1994. Since the workmen/ applicants were not found fit to be regularised and their case was refused , so concealing the facts , they have filed this case in this Hon'ble Tribunal . Their rights have already been decided by the CAT. I have perused the order of the CAT . Shri Sunder Pal Sharma and Shri Vishnu Paswan have filed O. A. No. 50/90 . The Hon'ble CAT has written that applicant No. I has put in more than three years services besides being the member of scheduled caste while applicant No. 2 has put in about 9 years of service . In view of this , they deserve to be considered on priority basis . Considering the facts and circumstances of the case , the respondents have been directed that in case . any fresh appointment is made to the post held by the applicants , they should be given preference over the outsiders . According to the order of the Hon'ble Court , in case outsiders were appointed and preference was not given to these two workmen they should have approached the CAT for directing the management to comply with the order of CAT but they have not done so . It was submitted by the management that their case has already been considered and no outsider has been appointed against their posts . They were daily rated mazdoor and they were not appointed against any post . There is adjudication of the CAT of 5th of July. 1994 when they were not found fit to be regularised they moved this case despite the order of the CAT.In case , there was any

[ PART 11 - SLC. 3 ( ii) ]

disobedience of the directions of the Hon'ble CAT . the workmen ought to have gone in contempt proceedings before the CAT. A fresh case on the same cause of action does not lie in this court or Tribunal . This indicates that the case of the workmen applicants was considered by the respondent and they were not found fit for regularisation . The workmen applicants have not proved their case so they are not entitled to get any relief. The reference is replied thus .

The action of the management of CSD in terminating the services of S Shri Sunder Pal and Om Parkash , daily rated Mazdoor w.e.f. January , 1989 and July . 1986 respectively is justified . The workmen/ applicants are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The award is given accordingly. Dt . 28-1-05

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 795.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी. पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 105/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42011 /24 96- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 7th February , 2005

S.O. 795. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 105 / 97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CPWD and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 7-2-05 .

[No. L -42011/24/ 96 - IR ( DU ) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - 11 , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR , RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

1. D. No. 105/97 Shri R. N. Rai . Presiding officer . In the matter of :

The General Secy .. CPWD , Karamchari Union ( Regd. ) . Plot No. 1. Aram Bagh , Near Udasin Mandir . New Delhi - 05 .

Versus

TheDirector General ( Works ) (CPWD , Nirman Bhawan , New Delhi - 01 2251 [ भाग ॥- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926.

"AWARD

The Ministry of Labourby its letter No. L - 420.1.1 / 24/96 - IR( DU ) Central Governmentdt . 09-07-1997 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder : --

"Whether the demand of the union/workman ( as per list below) for regularisation of their services as A. P. Os . after completion of 240 days ofcontinuous services as casual workers with the management of C.P.W.D. is fair and just ? If not , what relief the workman are entitled to" :

1. Shri Vinod Kumar

2. Shri Ashok Kumar

3. Shri Awdesh Kumar

4. Shri Gajendra Singh

5. Shri Krishan Pal

Therworkmen applicants have filed statement of claim through their union . It has been stated that the workmen have been Working with the management satisfactorily and carrying on their signed jobs most effectively. However, despite the fact of their effectively, and long years of services with the management , they are denied with the fruits of regularisation causing them irreparable financial losses .

That the impugned action of the management in not regularising is against all the canons of law and due to the above said action of the management the werkmen have been denied with the established law. i.e. equal pay for equal work. It is submitted that job security is a fundamental right of the workmen more over, it is stated thatwhile their counterparts A. P. O. rendering the same service get more wages and benefits the above said employers are left with the status of casual workers with less salary , no other benefits like D. A.. A. D. A. , L. T. A. , H. R. A. annual increments and facilities , medical facilities etc.

That the above said workmen are entitled for regularisation against their initial day of induct in the management with consequential benefits . That the workmen have a strong case in their favour and the rights of regularisaiton can't be denied to them . The policy of the management in not regularising the services of the workmen as A. P. Os . amounts to perpetuation of unfair trade practice resulting to moral degradation ofthe above said workmen .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side of the workmen applicants that they have filed this ID case for arrears of wages from the date of their initiation in service . Almost all the workinei štarted working in 1984 and they have been régularised in 1996. Three workmen have been engaged in 1984 and the rest two have been initially employed prior to 27-09-1985 . They have been regularised on different dates from 1996. It was submitted from the side of the management that when the post were vacant , they were regularised . No posts were created so there is no question of their regularisation from the initial date of their posting . It transpires from Aether dt . 21-08-1997 that all the workers have already been regularised on getting the allotment of the vacant posts in CPWD from the Deputy Director of Admn.-II. It is evident from the scheme which has conie into force w.e.f. 01-09-1993 that all the casual employees who have rendered 240 days service will be offered temporary status and the casual labourers who acquired temporary status . they will get minimum of the pay scale for a corresponding regular group-D officials including DA . HRA and CCA . It has also been mentioned in this memo that benefits of inorement at the same rate as applicable to a group-D. employees would be taken into account for calculating pro- rata wages for every one year of service subject to performance of duty for atleast 240 days . They have been granted leave encashmennt also. It has also been mentioned. in para 6 of the Memo that after rendering three years continuous service after conferment of temporary status. the casual labour would be treated on par with temporary group - D employees for the purpose of contribution to the General Provident Fund . It transpires from the perusal of the Memo dt . 30th September . 1993 that the casual labourers who have performed 240 days will be given temporary status and when they obtained temporary status . they are entitled to get pay scale of a corresponding regular group -D officials including DA, HRA and CCA. The memodt. 01-09-1993 specifically mentions that employee of temporary status will get the pay scale of a corresponding regular group - D officials including DA . HRA and CCA . According to this memo, the workman applicant after 240 days service have obtained temporary status and they are entitled to get pay scale of a corresponding regular Group -D officials including DA . HRA. CCA . As such , the casual labourers deserve to get scale ofpay corresponding to regular group - D employees . In this letter, there is no question of creation of posts or otherwise . If the Memo of the Department of Personnel and Training , casual labourers is given effect to the workmen applicants are entitled to get pay scale corresponding to class - D employees . The management witness has also admitted that the employees concerned are prior to the intposition of the ban . A ban was imposed on 11th of May, 1985 iliat the casual labourers willnot be regularised until a post is created . All these employees have been working prior to the imposition of the ban . As such, they deserve to get the pay scales of a corresponding class - Demployees .

The workmen applicants have filed their rejoinder and they have reiterated the averments stated in the statement of claim . The management has not filed written statement in this court but it was stated from the side of the management that the workmah applicant have already been regularised and the dates of their regularisation has been given.

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

My attention was drawn to FLR 1982 ( 44 ) 299 The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Randhir Singh case has held 565 G1/05-33 2252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

that equal pay should be paid for equal work . This is one of the fundamental right declared by the Constitution . According to Article 39 ( d ) of the Constitution , there shouldbe equal pay for equal work for both men and women. Directive principles of state policy also direct that equal pay should be given for equal work . Equality clause of the constitution must mean something to everyone . Article 14 of the Constitution enjoins the State not to deny any person equality before the law or the equal protection ofthe law .

In 1986 , SC 584, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the Central Government , the State Government and like wise all public sector undertakings are expected to function like model and enlightened employers . The principle of equal pay for equal work is an abstract doctrine which cannot be enforced in a court of law should ill- come from the mouths of the State and State Undertakings .

In 1991-1 LLJ 320 , the Hon'ble Supreme Court referring to Article 14 , 16 and 39 of the Constitution of India held that daily rated workmen of public sector corporation should get equal pay for equal work . The daily rated workers are also to be paid the salary of the permanent employees performing the same work . In Surinder Singh's case, it was held that daily wages employees of Central Public Works Department are entitled to pay and allowances on par with permanent employees . According to this decision , the respondent is bound to pay equal pay to the daily rated workers . In this decision , CPWD was itself respondent so this decision is fully applicable in the present case . It is admitted that the workman applicants were daily rated employees from 1984. They have been regularised in 1996 but in view of the decisions cited above , they are entitled to get equal pay of permanent employee from the initial date of their engagement . The management is indulging in unfair labour practices and despite the knowledge of judgement oftheHon'ble Supreme Court still daily rated employees have to seek remedy through legal forums .

It was submitted that the ban of 1985 was not imposed when these casual labourers were initially engaged . According to the management witness , they have been working prior to the ban imposed and in view of Memo of 1993 , they are entitled to get pay scale equivalent toClass - D regular employee as has been mentioned above.

The reference is replied thus :-

The demand of the union/workman (as per list mentioned above ) for regularisation of their services as A. P. Os . after completion of 240 days of continuous services as casual workers with the management of C. P. W. D. is fair and just . The respondent is directed to treat the workmen applicants as casual labourers on whom temporary status has been conferred from their initial date of service. They are entitled to get the pay scales of correspond group - D employees . The management is further directed to pay the workman applicants the pay scales corresponding to the pay scale of class -D regular employees from their initial date of engagement . The entire arrears of back wagesbe paid within two months

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] from the date of the publication of the award . In case of default, the workmen applicants will be entitled to 12% interest per annum on their entire back wages .

The award is given accordingly. Dt.: 27-1-2005

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 796.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्केलॉजिकल सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. ।। , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 202/ 99) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/137/99- आई . आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 7th February , 2005

S.O. 796.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 202/ 99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Archacological Survey of India and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 7-2-05 .

[No. L - 42012 / 137/ 99 - IR ( DU ) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT - 11 , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR , RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

I. D. No. 202/99

Shri R. N. Rai , Presiding officer

In the matter of :

Sh . Upendra Choudhary ,

Asrepresentedby Akhil Bhartiya Puratatav Sarvekshan , Kamgar Union , E- 26, ( Old Qtr) , Raja Bazar . Baba Kharak Singh Marg , New Delhi -01 .

Versus

The Director General . Archaeological Survey of India , Janpath , New Delhi - 11 .

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

[ भाग ।। -खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 42012/ 137/99 - IR ( DU) Central Government dtd . 13-10-1999 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :

"Whether the action of the Director General , Archaeological Survey of India , Janpatın , New Delhi in stopping from duty/ terminating the services of Sh . Upendra Choudhary w.e.f. 28-3-97 and not regularising him in the pay scale of Rs . 750-940 is justified, valid and legal ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled" .

That Sh . Upender Choudhary S/o Sh . Dhanukdari Choudhary was initially engaged in the year 1991 as Muster Roll Beldar and posted in Archaeological Survey of India in Delhi circle and worked at Humayun Tomb Red Fortetc. under the control of above management . That the working days of workman as referred hereinabove have been confirmed by the management in its written statement submitted before the conciliation officer and some of by issuing the certificates to the workınan .

That the workman demanded regularisation of his services through his trade union then the management annoyed and the sevices of workman were terminated w.e.f. 28-3-97 without any notice, notice pay, gratuity etc. and hundreds of junior workmen to him were retained like Sh . Kamlesh , Pitambar , Raj Kumar and some others were granted temporary status w.e.f. 1-9-93 .

That the workman performed his duty from July, 1991 and till the date of illegal termination i.e. 28-3-97 continuously under the definiton of continuous service provided under section 25B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That the workman had been performing his duty continuously and he was denied even equal pay for equal work as granted by the Deptt. of Personnel and Training vide its O. M. No. F. No. 49014/ 86- Estt . ( C) dated 7th June , 1988 .

That Sh . Upender Choudhary was performing the duty of casual workman as muster roll worker and had been performing the same day as the counter parts in the regular establishment as Beldar was doing and his duty hours were also the same but the management discriminated the workman even in the payment of equal pay for equal work while ignoring even the order of Govt . of India . Deptt. of Personnel and Training dated 7th June , 1988 .

Thatthereafter the Deptt . of Personnel and Training have also issued O. M. No. 51016/2/90 Estt . ( C) dated 10th September , 1993 and granted the temporary status and regularisation of casual workers w.e.f. 1-9-93 but the management have also not implemented in respect of the workman Sh . Upender Choudhary . Copy of the said O. M. is enclosed and marked as . That the Deptt . of Personnel and Training in its O. M. dated 10th September , 93 in para 6 have also inserted that if any additional benefits are admissible to casual workers in industrial establishment in view of the provision of Industrial

2253 Disputes Act , 1947 the they shall continue to be admissible to such casual labourers and the same is reproduced as under :-

"No benefits other than those specified above will be admissible to casual labourers with temporary status . However , if any additional benefits are admissible to casual workers working in Industrial establishments in view of provisions of Industrial DisputesAct, they shall continue to be admissible " ..

That the workman was performing the duties as unskilled workman for maintaining the Humayun Tomb , Red Fort etc. as the said maintenance work and activities are covered under the definition of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That the management with a view to deny to permanent status to the workman retained Sh . Upender Choudhary as daily rated worker from July , 1991 and terminated his services when he demanded regularisation w.e.f. 28-3-97 which action of the management is unfair labour practice as envisaged in item 10 of 5th schedule under section 2 ( ra) as unfair labour practice and the same portion is reproduced as under :-

"To employ workmen as " badlis " casuals or temporarties and to continue them as such for years , with the object of depriving them of the status and privileges of permanent workmen" .

That in the light of the provision of section 2 (ra ) of I. D. Act , 1947 the workman is entitled to be regularised in service in the time pay scale w.e.f. 28-3-97 in the pay scale of Rs . 750-940 and the revised pay scale of Rs . 2550-3200 w.e.f. 1-1-96 with all consequential benefits.

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been stated that the present application is liable to be dismissed as the Hon'ble Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to try the present dispute as the same is not an Industrial Dispute . Further the claimant is not a worker as per Industrial Act , and moreover , being a matter not related to Industrial Dispute , the present claim should be dismissed . That the claimant has concocted false story and has not come out with the true story and has concealed the material facts from this Hon'ble Tribunal as such as claim is liable to be dismissed . In this matter the management is a Central Govt .. Department under the Ministry of Human Resources Development , Department of Culture , Govt . of India and has been declared as Scientific and Technological Institution by Govt . of India vide notification No. 36016 / 2/89- Estt . Dated 27-10-89 published in the Gazette of India . Archaeological Survey of India is discharging its duties for the preservation and conservation of ancient and historical monuments and archaeological sites and remains which are declared to be of national importance under AM and ASR Act, 1958 , regulation of archaeological excavations , implementation of the ancient monument and archaeological sites and remains Act , 1958, Rules , 1959. The Antiquities and Art Treasure.Act, 2254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

1972, Rules 1973 etc. are lasobeing performed by the Archaeological Survey of India .

That the present claim is liable to be dismissed as the Archaeological Survey of India is neither an Industry nor industrial establishment nor industrial undertaking so as to attract the provisions of ID Act as Archaeological Survey of India is performing sovereign functions of the state as enshrined in the Constitution of India in looking after the centrally protected monument of national importance spread over throughout the length and breadth ofthe counrty .As such the provisions of Industrial Dispues Act shall not apply to the employees or the daily wages casuals engaged as Muster Rolls by the A. S. I. That the present claim is liable to be dismissed as the sanctioned staff/personnel are governed by the CCS regulations and statutory instructions issued by the Department of Personnel and Training . The said staff is classified as non- industrial posts . Besides posts . Besides the regular establishment , A. S. I. also engages daily wages casual labourers on need basis periodically for removal of vagetational growth and special repair works etc. on Monuments like mosque , tombs , pillars , Hauzes , wells , walls , inscriptions , cemeteries , temples and gardens etc. which is purely of casual/temporary nature and carried out for short duration . The said casual labourers of following regional trades like beldars , bandhani , stone cutter , mason etc. are for doing periodical repair of the monuments for archaeological excavations . The period of such work usually ranges from 3/4 weeks to 10/11 weeks depending upon the quantum of work . The wages to such daily waged casual labourers are paid in a accordance with the provisions of the minimum wages act .

That the respondent has not violated any Industrial Disputes Act or law and every action of theirs are within the ambit of law, as such the claim is liable to be dismissed . That the workman applicant has filed rejoinder and in hisrejoinder , he has denied most of the paras of the written statement and has reiterated the averments of the statement ofclaim .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record .It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that he was initially engaged asMuster Roll Beldar from 1991. He worked as Humayun Tomb Red Fort etc. under the control of the respondent/ manageme His services were terminated from 28-03-1997 ugh he was confirmed . Juniors to him have been retamed . The names of the juniors retained have been given i.e. Shri Kamlesh Kumar , Shri Pitamber , Slıri Raj Kumar and some others . These juniors have been given temporary status from 01-09-1993 . It was also submitted from the side of the workman applicant that he is entitled to equal pay for equal work .

My attention was drawn to Office Memo dtd . 10th September . 1993 of the Department of Personnel and Training , according to which the benefits of regularisation should be given to the casual workmen . According to Office Memo dtd . 7th June , 1988 workers are to be

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] regularised in view of AM and ASR Act, 1958 but the workman applicant has not been regularised and his services have been terminated after continuous working of6 years .

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that he was engaged for doing periodical work . There is no evidence in respect of the same and it has been admitted rather by the respondent that he worked continuously for 6 years . Juniors to him have been regularised .It was submitted by the respondents that the respondents are not industries and the court has no jurisdiction to decide the case. The job of the workman is of perennial nature and there is no question of creation of posts . The respondents carry systematic human activities . As such , in view of the Bangalore Water Supply, the ASI is an industry . In case , juniors to him have been retained , 25 -G is attracted . The law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court ---- first cum last go is also applicable in the instant case . The management has not repudiated the continuous working ofthe workman but much emphasis has been laid that the respondent is not an indutry but according to tastes laid down in the Bangalore Water Supply , the respondent is an industry . It is not engaged in sovereign work . It was submitted from the side of the management that he was removed from service on 28-03-1997 but he has moved the case in 1999 , as such , there is a gap of three years . There is delay and latches on the part of the workman applicant.

It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that admittedly juniors to the workman applicant havebeen retained and the workman applicant has worked continuously for six years . The names of the juniors have also been mentioned as such the respondent should regularise the services of the workman applicant according to principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of first cum - last go but the management has not followed thisprinciple .

In 1995 ( 71 ) FLR 462 Sh . Vikram's Chaudhary case the Hon'ble Supreme Court has propounded the theory of Ist come last go . It implies that juniors cannot be retained and seniors cannot be dispensed with their services . The management has indulged in unfair labour practices . The juniors have been retained and the workman has been removed .

The workman applicant is a manual labour . He must be doing some work for his livelihood . There is delay and latches in filing the 1. D. Act case so he deserves to get only 25 % back wages .

My attention was drawn to 82 (99 ) Delhi Law Times , 1990-1 - LLJ - 20 and 1979 ( 38 ) FLR - SC . I have perused these cases . These cases relate to abandoned but in this case , there is no question of abandonment . From the side of the workman applicant , my attention was drawn to 2003 ( 8 ) SCC, 334 and 2005 ( 8 ) SCC 444 , 1993 , LLJ -35 . I have gone through the decisions laid down . In the cases referred to above , there is no question of abandonment as such, the law cited by the management is not applicable

1 [ भाग ।। - खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2255

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

in the facts and circumstances of the case . There is delay in filing,the case. As such, in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court , the workman applicant is entitled to get 25% wages . The law cited by the management are notapplicable.

The workman deserves to be reinstated from 28-03-1997 with 25% back wages in view of delay and latches .

The reference is replied thus :-

The action of the Director General , Archaeologial Survey of India, Janpath , New Delhi in stopping from duty/terminating the services of Sh . Upendra Choudhary w.e.f. 28-3-97 and not regularising him in the pay scale of Rs . 750-940 is neither justified nor valid nor legal . The workman deserves to be reinstated with continuity of service and 25 % back wages from the date of his termination i.e. 28-03-1997 and he is entitled to get the pay of a permanent employee from 28-03-1997 . The management is directed to reinstate the workman applicant and make payment of arrears of wages within two months after publication of the award . In case of default, the workman applicant will be entitled to 12% interest on the entire back wages .

The award is given accordingly .

Dt.: 20-1-04

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 797.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 296/1999) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011/59/1999- आई. आर. ( बीः II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 8th February, 2005 S.O. 797.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes:Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 296/ 1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Dhanbad No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 8-2-2005 .

[No. L - 12011 /59/ 1999 - IR ( B - II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the 1. D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 296 of 1999 .

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank and their workmen .

APPEARANCES :

Onthe behalf of the workmen : Mr. D. K. Verma Advocate. Onbehalf of the employers : Mr.S. K. Aggarwal, Advocate. State : Jharkhand

Industry: Bank Dated. Dhanbad, the 27th January , 2005

AWARD

The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 )( d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -12011 /59/99- IR ( B - II ) dated 26th August , 1999 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank , Patna in dismissing S/ Shri Mahendra Prasad, Staff No. 26111 , Peon , Canara Bank, Govindpur Branch , Shyamdahin Dhobi , Staff No. 17948 Clerk, Canara Bank , Govindpur. Branch and Jawarahlal Gupta, Arm, Guard , Canara Bank , Govindpur Branch , from the services of the company only on the basis of conviction made U/ s . 323 of the IPCby the J. M. Ist Class , Dhanbad order dt . 21-8-96 in GR Case No. 3689/92 ( appeal against which is pending in the Court of Dist. & Session Judge, Dhanbad) and without holding any enquiry and providing principle of natural justice after issue of chargesheet' dt. 29-9-92 to afl the concerned workmen is justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to

2. The case of the concerned workmen according to Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring on their behalf in brief is as follows :

The sponsoring union subinitted that the concerned workimen were falsely implicated in a criminal case by Senior Manager Mr. K. P. Baranwal in view of FIR lodged by him at Govindpur . P. Sa After receipt of the said FIR Govindpur PS , started a case bearing No. 260/92, They submitted that the concerned workmen were found guilty 2256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14. 1926

[ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

who has , or at any time , has been adjudicated insolvent , orsuspended the payment or compounded with his creditor or , who has , or has been convicted by a criminal court for offence involved in moral turpitude . As per clause 19( 3 ) ( b) ofthe Bipartite Settlementdt . 19-1-1966 , if the employee isconvicted by any Court of law , he may be dismissed with effect from the date of conviction . There is also a similar provision under Chapter XI , Regulation 21 (3 ) (a) of Canara Bank Service Code . They submitted that the workmen were convicted by Criminal Court for an offence involved in moral turpitude . The provisions of Banking Regulation Act imposes restriction on the Respondent Bank that the Bank employees convicted by a criminal court for an offence involved in moral turpitude shall no longer continue in the Bank irrespective of the fact whether the employee undergoes sentence of punishment or not . Forthe above purpose the conviction itself is enough . Since there was a statutory prohibition for the continuation of employment of the workmen in the Bank , the Board of Directors , the Competent Authority , in exercise of power conferred under Regulation 21 ( 3 ) ( a) read with Regulation 21 (4) of Chapter XI of Canara Bank Service Code, dismissed the workmen from the services of the Bank .

by the Ld . Magistrate vide his order dt . 21-8-96 , wherein they were convicted under Section 323 I. P. C. and ordered to be released on probation on executing bond with two sureties of Rs . 30,000 with the condition to maintain peace and good behaviour for one year . However , they were acquitted from the charges brought under Section 353/ 448/325 1. P. C. Against that order of conviction the concerned workmen preferred an appeal before the Appellate authority vide Criminal Appeal No. 135/96 . They alleged that during pendency of the hearing of the said appeal management dismissed the concerned workmen on the basis of conviction passed by the Ld . Magistrare inCr . Case No. 3609/92, without holding domestic enquiry though chargesheets were issued to them . During pendency of that appeal the concerned workmen also raised the present industrial dispute and challenged the validity and legality of dismissal order issued against them by the management for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal . They submitted that vide order dt. 16-2-2001 learned Additional Sessions Judge . Dhanbad acquitted the concerned workmen from all charges after setting aside the order of conviction passed against themby the Ld . Magistrate and also simultaneously were discharged of the liabilities to file bonds as directed under the Probation of Offenders ' Act. Thereafter , the management passed the order to reinstate the concerned workmen and allowed them to resume their duties . They submitted that that the concerned workmen were not paid the wages for the intervening period from the date of dismissal i.e. 3-3-98 till the date ofreporting the Bank on reinstatement in the service . They alleged that the management withheld the wages of the concerned workmen for the intervening period treated as "Not spent on duty , " illegally and arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice . They submitted that the concerned workmen are very much entitled for the wages during the intervening period . Accordingly they submitted prayer to pass Award holding that the dismissal of the concerned workmen were illegal and justified and also directing the management to pay wages for the idle period i.e. from the date of dismissal to the date of reinstatement in their services .

However, the workmen on appeal were acquitted in the criminal case and the matter was placed before the Board of Directors and on examining the same , it was ordered to reinstate the workmen in the services of the Bank subject to the terms and conditions mentioned therein . Accordingly the concerned workmen were reinstated in the service subject to the terms and conditions mentioned therein . They submitted that since the concerned workmen were involved themselves in a criminal offence amounting to moral turpitude though they were later acquitted , they have disabled themselves from rendering the services on account of conviction . As the impugned order is completely justified in law and needs no interference . Consequently to the acquittal in the Criminal Case the concerned workmen were reinstated in service by order of the Competent Authority subject to the condition that the period of suspension of Sri S. D. Dhobi between30-9-1992 to 7-2-1995 and the intervening period from the date of serving of dismissal order i.e. 3-3-1998 till his joining the Bank as one not spent on duty and therefore is not entitled to for any back wages. Similarly as regards Sri Mahendra Prasad , the intervening period and serving the dismissal order i.e. 28-3-98 till hisjoining the Bank was treated as one not spent on duty and therefore he was not entitled to get any back wages . In respect of Sri Jawaharlal Gupta the intervening period from the date of serving the dismissal order i.e. 27-2-1998 till his rejoining the Bank was treated as one not spent on duty and therefore he was not entitled for any back wages .

3.Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement-cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the Written Statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workmen. They submitted that on the ground of assaulting the Manager of the Bank, an FIR was lodged against the concerned workmen and on the basis of which a criminal case was started against them . After investigation Police submitted chargesheet and thereafter trial of that case was taken up by the Ld . Judicial Magistrate 1st Class , Dhanbad . After trial the accused persons were found guilty under Section 323 I. P. C. and were convicted accordingly butinstead of pronouncement of any sentence they were released under the Probation of Offender Act on executing bond .

They submitted that as per Section 10 ( 1 ) ( b ) ( i ) of Banking Regulations Act, 1949 no Banking Company shall employ or continue the employment of any person ,

They submitted that the workmen were terminated from the services on account of conviction by the Criminal Court . Section 10( 1 ) ( d ) of Banking Regulation Act , 1949 prohibits the Banking Company from employing or continuing the employment of any person who has been convictedby the Criminal Court for the offence involving moral turpitude . In view of the statutory prohibition for [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

continuing the employment of the workmen in the services of the Bank, the Competent Authority after considering the conviction , exercised the powers conferred under Regulation 21 (3)( a) read with Regulation 21 (4) of Canara Bank Service Code dismissed them from service of the Bank . The dismissal of the workmen were justified in law and therefore they were out of employment during the period for which the workmen now claim back wages . The workmen had not rendered any work in the Bank during that period when they were out of service . Therefore, the claim of the workmen for back wages is not maintainable and against the principle of service jurisprudence . Management accordingly submitted prayer to pass Award rejecting the claim of the workmen .

4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED :

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank , Patna in dismissing S/ Sh . Mahendra Prasad , Staff No. 2611 , Peon , Canara Bank, Govindpur Branch , Shyamdahin Dhobi , Staff No. 17948 , Clerk , Canara Bank , Govindpur Branch and Jawaharlal Gupta, Arm Guard , Canara Bank , Govindpur Branch, from the services of the company only on the basis of conviction made U /S 323 of IPC by the J. M. Ist Class , Dhanbad orderdt. 21-8-96 in Gr . Case No. 3689/92 ( appeal against which , is pending intheCourt ofDistt . and Sessions Judge , Dhanbad ) and without holding any enquiry and providing principlesofnatural justice after issue ofchargesheet .dt. 29-9-92 to all the concerned workmen is justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to ?"

5. FINDING WITH REASONS :

It is admitted fact that the concerned workmen have been reinstated in service by the management after they were acquitted by the Appellate Court in connection with a Criminal Appeal No. 135/96 arising out ofGr . Case No. 3609/92 . It is also admitted fact that the concerned workmen were dismissed from service with effect from 3-3-98 by the management when they were found guilty and convicted by the Ld . Magistrate in connection with Gr. Case No. 3609/92 ( Govindpur P. S. Case No. 260/92) U/S 323 IPC: However , Ld. Magistrate instead of imposing any sentence released the convicts i.e. the accused persons on probation under Probation of Offenders Act on executing bond with two sureties with the condition to maintain peace and good behaviour for one year . Against that judgement and order of the Ld . Magistrate being aggrieved the convicts i.e. the concerned workmen preferred an appeal . As the workmen have already been reinstated in şervice , learned Advocate of both sides in course of hearing submitted that it is redundant to consider whether management was justified or not in dismissing them from service on the basis of order of conviction passed by the Ld . Magistrate withholding any domestic enquiry in view of chargesheet issued to them . Here only pointfor consideration is whether the concerned workmen are entitled to get back wages from the date of dismissal i.e. 3-3-98 till the date of their respective reinstatement

2257

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

in service. It is the contention of the Ld . Advocate for the concerned workmen that as the concerned workmen were kept on probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act by order ofthe Ld . Magistrate on executing a bond of Rs . 30,000 subject to condition that they will maintain peace and tranquility in the locality for a period of one year they are not to be dismissed from service in view of provision as laid down under Section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act . Section 12 of the said Act speaks as follows :-

"Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law, a- person found guilty of an offence and dealt withunder the provisions of Section 3 or Section 4 shall not suffer disqualification , if any, attaching to a conviction of an offence under such law :

Provided that nothing in this Section shall apply to a person who , after his release under Section 4 issubsequently sentenced for the original offence." In the decision reported in Supreme Court Labour Judgement page 443. Their Lordships of the Hon'ble Apex Court in para 14 observed as follows:

" It was suggested that Section 12 of the Act completely obliterates the effect of any conviction and wipes out the disqualification attached to a conviction of an offence under such law . This argument , in our opinion , is based on a gross misreading of the provisions of Section 12 of the Act. The words , ' attaching to a conviction of an offence under such law¹ refer to two contingencies ; (i ) that there must be a disqualification resulting from a conviction and (ii ) that such disqualification must be provided by some law other than the probation of Offenders Act . The penal Code does not contain any such disqualification. Therefore , it cannot be said that Section 12 of the Act contemplates an automatic disqualification attaching to a conviction and obliteration of the criminal misconduct of the accused . It is also manifest that disqualification is essentially different in its connotation from the word ' misconduct ' . Disqualification , cannot be automatic consequence ofmisconduct , unless the statute so requires . Proof of misconduct may or may not lead to disqualification , because this matter rests on the facts and circumstances of a particular case or the language in which the particular statute is covered. In the instant case neither Art . 311 (2) proviso ( a) nor Rule 14( i ) of the Rules of 1968 contain any express provision that the moment a person is found guilty of a misconduct on a criminal charge he will have to be automatically dismissed from service . Article 311 (2) proviso (2) is an enabling provisión which merely dispenses withwith the various stages of thedepartmental inquiry and the show cause notice . Rule 14 despite incorporating the principle of proviso (a) to Art . 311 (2 ) enjoins on the disciplinary authority to consider the circumstances of the case before passing any order . Thus , in our opinion , it is a fallacy to presume that the conviction of a 2258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] delinquent employee simpliciter without anything more will result in his automatic dismissal or removal from service ."

against the order of conviction . As the concerned workmen did not enjoy the privilege given by the Ld . Magistrate in hisorder under Section 4 of the Probation of Officers Act they were treated as convicts till the disposal of the appeal in question . Learned Advocate for the management accordingly relying on the decision reported in 1997 Supreme Court cases L & S ( 491 ) , 1997 Supreme Court cases ( L & S) ( 847 ) and 1998 11 CLR- 230 submitted that as the concerned workmen were convicted they are not entitled to get back wages though subsequently they have got the acquittal from the Appellate Court . Their Lordship of the Hon'ble Apex Court observed in the decision reported in 1997 Supreme Court Case ( L & S) 491 :

Their Lordships discarded automatic dismissal or removal from service . On the contrary the submission of the management is that Banking Regulation Act imposed restrictions to the effect that when an employee of the Bank is convicted by any Court under Criminal law for and offence involving of moral turpitude shall no longer continue in the Bank irrespective of the fact whether the employees undergo the sentence of punishment or not . Learned Advocate for the management submitted that since there was a statutory obligation the competent authority in exercise of powers conferred under Regulation 21 ( 3 ) (a) read with Regulation 21 ( 4 ) of Chapter XI of Canara Bank Service code have dismissed the concerned workmen from the services of the Bank .

"Question of back wages would be considered only if action by way ofdisciplinary proceedings has been taken against him and the action was found to be unsustainable in law and he was unlawfully prevented from discharging the duties . In that context his conduct becomes relevant . Each case is required to be considered in its own backdrop ."

Therefore, it is clear that if any order of dismissal isissued by the appointing authority relying on the order of conviction passed by the Court and subsequently ifthe said order of conviction is set aside by the Appellate forum the concerned employee is debarred from getting back wages . Accordingly relying on the decisions referred to above I hold that the concerned workmen are not entitlec to get back wages in view of their claim . In the result, the following Award is rendered :-

"As the concerned workmen have already been reinstated in service , learned Advocates on botl sides in course of hearing submitted that it redundant to consider whether management wa justified or not in dismissing them from service or the basis of order of conviction passed by the Ld Magistrate withholding any domestic enquiry in vev of chargesheet issued to them . So , no Award i passed in this regard . However , it is held that the concerned workmen are not entitled to get any bacl wages from the date of dismissal till the date ofthei respective reinstatement in service . "

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 798.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एन. एफ. रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय गुवाहाटी, असम के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या 24(सी) /2002 ] को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-41012/100/2002- आई. आर. ( बी. [ ) ] It is admitted fact that the concerned workmen being aggrieved with the order of the Ld. Magistrate preferred an appeal before the Court of Ld. District and Session Judge , Dhanbad which was registered as Criminal Appeal No. 135/96 . It is therefore , clear that they preferred an appeal against the order of conviction and not against the order of keeping them under probation of Offenders Act . Any order passed under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders should be considered as a subsequent step of the order of conviction with a view to give the convict an opportunity to correct himself in future and in such case the order of sentence is kept in abeyance. It is fact that as per Section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act when a convict is dealt with under Sections 3 and 4 of the Probation ofOffenders Act shall not suffer disqualification if any attaching to a conviction of an offence under such law or not . In para - 14 of the judgement referred to above Their Lordships ofthe Hon'ble Apex Court discussed this issueclearly and observed to the effect that " In our opinion it is a fallacy to presume that the conviction of a delinquent employee simpliciter without anything more will result in his automatic dismissal or removal from service . " It is seen that immediately after passing the order by the Ld. Magistrate the concerned workmen were dişmissed from service by the appropriate authority in view of Banking Regulation applicable to the employees as referred to above . As subsequently the concerned workmen were acquitted by the appellate Court question have come forward whether they are entitled to get back wages for the entire period of their dismissal . Ld . Advocate for the concerned workmen submitted that as the concerned workmen were kept on probation as per Section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act they should not be disqualified from rendering service to the Bank . Here the picture appears to be quite different and for which I finddifficult to support the contention of the . Ld . Advocate for the concerned workmen . The matter would have been ended and question of application of Section 12 of the Probation ofOffenders Act would arise if the concerned workmen would not prefer appeal against the order of conviction passed by the Ld . Magistrate . The concerned workmen did not prefer appeal against the order of keeping them on probation U'S 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act but

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 798.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award [ Ref. No. 24( c) of 2002 ] of the Industrial Tribunal , Guwahati , Assam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of N. F. Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-02-2005 .

[No. L -41012/ 100/2002 - IR ( B - I) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, GUWAHATI , ASSAM

Reference No. 24 (C) of 2002

PRESENT :

Shri D. C. Choudhury , Presiding Officer , Industrial Tribunal , Guwahati

In the matter of Industrial Dispute BETWEEN :

The Management of the General Manager ( P) , N. F. Railway, Maligaon .

Vs.

Their workmen Shri Thanu Ram Deka.

APPEARANCE :

Shri K. C. Sarma Advocate. : For the Management Shri K. K. Biswas : For the Workmen Advocate .

Date of Award

:31-12-2004

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute has been registered on the basis of the reference made by Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour . New Delhi vide its letter No. L - 41012 / 100 / 2002 ( IR ) ( B - 1 ) , dt . 24-10-2002 to adjudicate the dispute arising between the Management of N. F. Railway and its workman Shri Thanu Ram Deka on the following issue :

"Whether the action of the Management of N. F. Railway in denying absorption of Shri Thanu Ram Deka . Ex . Casual Labour to the temporary status under N. F. Railway , since 1994 along with other 9 ( nine ) Casual workers is justified ? If not , what relief Sri Thanu Ram Deka entitled to ?" On receipt of reference , a reference case was registered in this Court and notices were issued both parties calling upon them to file their written statement/ addi . written statement and documents if any. In response to the notices both parties appeared in this court and filed their written statement . Both parties also adduced evidence both oral and documentary in support of their respective case .

565 G1/05-34

2259.

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

The case of the workman in brief is as follows :

That the workman Sri Thanu Ram Deka got appointment as Casual Labour in 1974 in the N. F. Railway's construction to organization and continued to serve the Railway till 16-3-77 when his residential house atBhaihata Chariali in the Kamrup District got burnt due to a devastating fire and all his belongings , including all the valuable documents relating to his service reduced to ashes .

That on consequent of the said Fire - accident the workman Sri Thanu Ram Deka lost all his self- control , gotmentally derailed and suffered depression for quite a long span of years and undergone treatment under the famous psychiatrist Dr. Deepali Dutta of Guwahati .

That during those long spans of years of the workman's ailments the Management had neither retrenched his services nor communicated anything to his home address which postulates that Sri Thanu Ram Deka is still in Railway service and entitled to get all benefits in accordance with the Railway Rules .

Thaton being found medically fit the workman want to resume his duties on 6-3-97 with all valid medical certificates; but he was told by the Managements that since his name was not in the " LIVE CASUAL LABOUR REGISTER ", as on 1981 , his resumption /re - instatement of service would not be allowed .

That the Management/ N . F. Railway administration's such plea of disallowing the rightful claim of the workman for his resumption/ re - instatement in service was but ridiculous and brazen decision . For , it is the duty of the administration /Management to record the names of all Casual Labours , both of the project/ construction and open - line in the " Life Register " as per Railway Board's directives whose names were in the Roll ofGroup -Demployments , i.e. project Casual Labourers prior to 1-1-1981 .

That the Management/ the Railway administration hasmisrepresented the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment communicated vide Railway Board's circular No. PC/ IV/ 86/DA- 1 dated 24-9-86 which laid down that the project Casual Labourers who had completed 180 days service on or before 1-1-81 would continue to be brought under the scheme of absorption of project Casual Labours and their names should be enlisted by the departments and thereon had tobe appointed by 31-3-87 .

That as ill fuck would have it , during the material period of absorption of the project Casual Labours in the eighties the workman Sri Thanu Ram Deka was in the sick- list and despite knowing the fact of his prolong sickness the N. F. Railway administration / Management suo motu did not think it tobe expedient to enlist his name and regularise his service in the regular employment ofGroup - D staff at par his nine batch - mates who were absorbed as Gangmen , and thus arbitrarily deprived him ofhis rightful claim of re - instatement /absorption , albeit he is still in the Railway service as no Notice / Order of his retrenchment/termination has been issued so far .

2260

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

Thatit is submitted that 9 (nine) casual labourers , junior to the workman Sri Thanu Ram Deka , were screened vide GM ( Works ) N. F. Railway/ Maligaon's Memorandum No. W/FCW/( E - IM ) (B ) / PT - II dt . 11-7-94 and subsequently posted in Lumding Division , ignoring the claim of the workman Sri Thanu Ram Deka despite repeated representations and personal approaches to the Management by Sri Deka and this Union , both written and oral .

ThatManagement in spite of having repeated notices from the ALC( C) Guwahati did not bother for the least to attend the joint discussion/conciliation which resulted " the dispute ended in a failure ex parte in absence of the N. F. Railway Management , particularly the management did not show any interest in attending in conciliation" , as observed by the ALC ( C) / Guwahati while referring the matter to the Ministry of Labour /New Delhi .

Thatthe workman on 1997 came to the office of the Management to resume his duties alongwith modically fitcertificate . But the Management admitted the fact that as the name of the workman is not in the " LIVE CASUAL LABOUR REGISTER " he was not allowed to resume his duties . It may be mentioned here that in pursuant to directions given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in their order dated 23rd Feb. 87, in W.P. No. 332 of 1986 , the Ministry of Railways decided that the cases of project casual Labour who had worked such before 01-01-1981 and who were discharged due to completion of work or for want of further work , may be considered for absorption in Group " D " post . In this respect , wide circulation/ publicity was given to all concerned to submit written representation with adequate documentary proof in this regard to as to reach the concerned Railway Divisional Office on or before 31-3-1987 for consideration / entry of their name's in the supplementary project live register . After verification , those whose names were found fit for absorption were absorbed accordingly in the Railway.

That the inaction and the wanton attitude of the N. F. Railway Management have violated the principles ofNatural Justice and the set to Rules established by the Railway System itself for causing detrimental action to an employee by not giving his " Just dues " of legitimate claim and thereby hits the Articles- 14 . 16(1 ) , 39 (a ) & 309 of the Constitution of India .

Butthe name of the instant workman was not borne or record i.e. "Supplementary Live Register " , hence his case could not be considered . As soon as project works were over , or completed . the project casual labour was discharged from work , and therefore no rights subsist at all .

The representation of Sri Deka was found incomplete and without authentic documentary proof of having worked as construction casual labour . By this time. the workman has lost all rightful claims .

Under the above facts and circumstances the workman has prayed for passing an award for reinstatement of his service with all consequential benefits with their retrospective effect from the date of his due date of getting such redressal of grievances and direct the N. F. Railway Administratiion/ Management to implement the order forthwith .

The case of the management in brief is as follows :

That the nine casual labour considered only on the basis of the record available in the office records and so they were screened /absorbed in regular service in Group 'D' post .

That the suit is not maintainable in present form in law as well as in fact and is liable to be dismissed .

That the suit is barred by law of limitation in as such as the workman /petitioner has filed the suit after a gap oftwenty years according to his own submission which isbeyond the period of limitation and as such the suit is liable to be dismissed .

The management examined one witness while the union examined 3 witnesses . Both parties also adduced some documentary evidence . I have carefully scrutinised the entire evidences on the record and heard the argument advanced by learned counsel Shri K. C. Sarma appearing for the management and Shri K. K. Biswas appearing for the union .

That it was no fault of the management but for workman's own fault he himself debarred from getting re-engagement regularly in Railway .

That some post facto certificate . i.e. Police- ccrtificate from P. S. at Baihata Charjali , certificate of village Head and Psychiatrist treatment certificate were submitted by the workmen in 1997 which is exactly twently years later of the incident . All these were not submitted during the factual time .

That as soon as the Project works have been completed, the Casual project workers are automatically got discharged from the engagement as the person concerned was required only for the specified engagement . Any communication regarding retrenchment or is required even no notice was served to the workman in such engagement. The service of this type of workman was automatically demised due to completion of the project work.

There is no dispute between the parties that the workman Shri Thanu Ram Deka was working as Casual Labour under the Management . It is apparent from the evidence of the workman himself that since 1977 he is not working under the management as he was suffering from mental sickness . The workman also deposed that he recovered from mental illness in the year 1997 and he applied to the management for allowing him to resume his duties. But the management did not allow him . He also deposed that the management has regularised the service of persons who were working with him at the same time. It is admitted by workmen himself that his name is not there in the " LIVE CASUAL LABOUR REGISTER" . It reveals from the evidence of the M. W. I Shri Parimal Ch . Dey that vide ext . A Railway Board issued a circular stating that these workers who were working as casual labourer prior to 1981 , their names should be entered in "LIVE CASUAL LABOUR REGISTER " and they were asked to apply within 31-3-87 with all documents . But [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

226.1

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

the name of the workman has not been entered in " LIVE CASUAL REGISTER " as the workmen did not apply for entry ofhis name in the Live Casual Register . It is apparent from the evidences of the workman himself that since 1977 to 1997 he did not work as casual labour under the management and he also did not apply for entry of his name in the Live Casual Register. Only in the year 1997 after a gap of 20 years the workman applied to the management to consider his case . Even the plea of the workman that he was suffering from mental sickness , other person of his family or near relative could have informed and applied to the management regarding these fact . Ext . ' 8' shows that Dr. D. Dutta issued a certificate to the effect that the workman Shri Thanu Ram Deka was under her treatment since 15-1-80 till 20-2-90 , as he was suffering from mentally illness . She has issued fitness certificate to the workman w.e.f. 6-3-97 . As there is no information and application to the management from the side of the workman , naturally his name did not find place in the Live Casual Register of the management . Only those employees whose name found place in the Live Casual Register were only absorbed .

In the above premises I hold that the action of the management of N. F. Railway denying the absorption of Thanu Ram Deka , ex - Casual Labour to the temporary status under N. F. Railway is justified .

However in the interest of justice I direct the Management of N. F. Railwayto consider the case ofthe workman Shri Thanu Ram Deka for fresh appointment in a regular Group ' D' post under the management within a period of 6 ( six) months .

Award is given under my hand and seal on this 31st December , 2004 .

D. C. CHOUDHURY , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 799.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 314/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-41012/ 67/2002- आई. आर. ( बी- I ) 」 बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 799. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( 1. D. No. 314/ 04) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western Railway and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 08-02-2005 .

[No. L - 41012/67/2002 - IR ( B - I ) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 314/04 (Old ITC No. 65/2002 transferred from I. T. Ahmedabad)

(a) The Divisional Railway Manager (E) , Western Railway , Divisional Office , Pratapnagar , Baroda-394220 .

(b) The Carriage & Western Superintendent , Western Railway , B. G. Ahmedabad Railway Station , Ahmedabad - 380001 V/s. FirstParty The Org . Secretary , the Association of Railway, And post employees , 15 , Shashi Apartment , Nr. Anjalee Cinema Vasna Road, Ahmedabad- 380007 .

Second Party APPEARANCES : FirstParty : Absent Second Party : Absent AWARD

1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by Order No. L -41012/67/2002 - IR ( B - I ) dated 20-09-2000 to this Tribubal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Divisional Railway Manager ( E) Western Railway, Baroda/ C.W.S . Ahmedabad in terminating the services of Shri Bharat Bhaijibhai Vaghela is justified ? If not, what relief the concern workman isentitled to ? "

2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 28th November , 2002. The date to file the statement of claim was 16-12-02. The appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim with relevant documents and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within 15 days of the receipt of the order .

3.However, opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party . The second party failed to submit a statement of claim after 2 years from the date of reference . Thus Tribunal has reason to believe that the second party is not interested in this dispute. The second party has failed to establish that his 2262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 / PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

APPEARANCES :

termination is not just. Looking to the above observation I hereby pass the following order :

FirstParty : P.K. Handa (Absent)

ORDER

Second Party : ( Absent)

AWARD

The action of the first party in terminating service of Shri Bharat Bhaijibhai Vaghela is just and proper . The second party is not entitled for any relief. Hence reference is rejected . No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad . Date : 11-10-04

1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by order No. L- 41012/26/2002 - IR ( B - 1 ) dated 12-06-2002 to this Tribunal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under:

SCHEDULE

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

"Whether the action of the management of Western Railway in dismissing the services of Shri Ganpat A Parmar w.e.f. 01-06-1996 , vide NIP No. E - 308 / Badi/7113 dated 31-05-1996 is justified ? If not, what relief the concerned applicant is entitled and from which date ? "

का. आ. 800.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 776/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 30-08-02 . The date to file the statement of claim was 07-10-02 . The appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim with relevant document and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within 15 days of the receipt of the order .

[सं . एल-41012/26/2002- आई . आर. ( बी-1 ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

3. However, proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party . The second party failed to submit a statement of claim after 2 years and 4 months from the date of reference. Thus this Tribunal has reason to believe that the second party is not interested in the dispute . Thus the second party has not satisfactorily proved that his dismissal w.e.f. from 01-06-1996 is unjust . Looking to the above observation I hereby pass the following order:

ORDER

S.O. 800.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( I. D. No. 776 / 04) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western Railway and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 08-02-2005.

[No. L - 41012 /26/2002 - IR ( B - I ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

The action of the management of Western Railway indismissing the services of Shri Ganpat A Parmar w.e.f. 01-06-1996 , vide NIP No. E - 308 / Badi / 7113 dated 31-05-1996 is justified . The workman is not entitled to any relief. The reference is hereby rejected . No order as to cost .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 9 फरवरी , 2005

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M .. Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 776/04

(Old ITC No. 25/2002 transferred from I.T. Ahmedabad)

( a) The General Manager , Western Railway, Mumbai -400 001 .

का. आ. 801.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 777/04) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

(b) The Works Manager . Western Railway Pratapnagar, Baroda- 390 004 .

FirstParty

V/s.

[सं. एल-41012/ 103/ 2001 - आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव The Divisional Secretary,

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 Paschim Railway Karamchari Parisad , Shastri Pole . Kothi , Baroda - 390 001 .

S.O. 801. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Second Party [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Government hereby publishes the award ( I.D. No. 777/ 04) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 08-02-05 .

[No. L - 41012/103 /2001 - IR ( B - I) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 777/04

(Old ITC No. 26/2002 transferred from I.T. Ahmedabad)

The Divisional Manager , Western Railway Pratapnagar , Baroda-390 004 .

FirstParty

V/s .

The General Secretary , Paschim Railway Karamchari Parisad , E/209 , Sarvottam Nagar , Nr. Railway Colony , Sabarmati , Ahmedabad - 380 019 .

2263

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

Looking to the above observation, I hereby pass the following order :

ORDER

Theaction of Divisional Railway Manager , Western Railway, Baroda in removing of Shri Narayan J. Bhil working under SM . Bhadarva w.e.f. 5-2-2000 is justified. The workman is not entitled to any relief. The reference ishereby rejected . No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad Date : 12-10-2004

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 802.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 751/04) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-41012/54/2001- आई . आर. ( बी-1 ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

Second Party

APPEARANCES :

First Party : Shri R.D. Mathuresh

Second Party : ( Absent)

1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by Order No. L- 41012/ 103/2001-1R( B - 1 ) dated 07-12-2001 to this Tribunal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under.

"Whether the action of the Divisional Railway Manager, Western Railway , Baroda in removing of Shri Narayan J. Bhil working under SM. Bhadarva w.e.f. 5-2-2000 is justified ? If not , what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?"

2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 15-11-2002 . The date to file the statement of claim was 18-11-2002 . The appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim with relevant documents and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within 15 days of the date of receipt of the order .

3. However, proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party. The second party failed to submit the statement of claim after 3 years from the date of reference . Thus , this Tribunal has reason to believe that the second party is not interested in this dispute. Thus the second party has failed to prove that his removal is notjust .

S.O. 802. In pursuance of Section 17. of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( ID . No. 751 / 04) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 08-02-05 .

[No. L - 41012/54/2001 - IR ( B - I) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 751/04

(Old ITC No. 37/2001 transferred from I.T. Ahmedabad)

A. The Divisional Railway Manager , Western Railway Pratapnagar , Baroda- 390 004 .

B. The Asst . Electrical Engineer, Western Railway, Ahmedabad.

FirstParty

V/s .

The General Secretary ,

Paschim Railway , Karamchari Parisad , Sarvottam Nagar , Nr . Railway Colony, Sabarmati , Ahmedabad . ... Second Party 2264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 / PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

APPEARANCES :

FirstParty : P.K. Handa (Absent)

Second Party : B.K. Sharma

AWARD

1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by Order No. L-41012/54/ 2001 - IR ( B - 1 ) dated 03-09-2001 to this Tribunal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Management of Divisional Railway Manager, Western Railway , Baroda in withholding Shri Jayntilal C. who promoted as Armachar Winder Gr . - II w.e.f. 13-9-1995 but not relieved and issuing another order dated 28-6-2000 consequently relieving him w.e.f. 29-6-2000 and then denying economic benefits on promoted post w.e.f. 13-9-95 is justified ? If not , what relief the concerned workman is entitled .

2. During the course of proceeding the second party union has submitted a purshis by Ex . 6. The facts of this purshis is that Reference C.G.I.T.A No. 753/04 is pending before this Tribunal of the same terms of reference . The second party wants to proceed in Reference C.G.I.T.A No. 753 04. So that the union requested that the Reference C.G.I.T.A No. 751/04 is disposed of.

Looking to the above facts , I hereby pass the follow ing order .

ORDER

cost . The reference is hereby disposed off. No order as to Almedabad. Date 12-10-2004

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 803.- औद्योगिक विवाद अर्धािनयम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एन.एफ. रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय गुवाहाटी, असम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या रेफ. नं. आई (सी) '2002) को प्रकाशित करती है . जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08- 02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-41011 /17/2001- आई . आर. ( बी -1 ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi . the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 803. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. I ( C) of 2002) of the Industrial Tribunal , Guwahati , Assam now

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of N.F. Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 08-02-2005 .

[No. L - 41011 / 17 /2001 - IR ( B - 1 ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI , ASSAM

Reference No. I ( C) of 2002 .

PRESENT :

Shri D. C. Choudhury , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI In the matter of an Industrial Dispute between :

The Management of, N.F. Railway , Guwahati .

V/s

The General Secy Rail Mazdoor Union , 27/B , Rest Camp , Pandu , Guwahati - 12.

Date of Award : 24-12-2004 AWARD

This Industrial Dispute has been registered on the basis of the reference made by Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi vide its Letter No. L - 41011 / 17 /2001 dated 31-10-2001 to adjudicate the dispute arising between the Management of N.F. Railway and its General Secy. Rail Mazdoor Union , Guwahati . On the following issue :

"Whether the action of the Management of N.F. Railway by not granting the arrears to the drawing staff such as C.D.M. , H.D.M. , D.M. & A.D.M. was justified ? If not , to what relief the workmen are entitled ?"

2. On receipt of reference , a reference case was registered in this Court and notices were issued both parties calling upon them to file their written statement/ addl . written statement and documents if any . In response to the notices both parties appeared in this court and filed their written statement Both parties also adduced evidences both oral and documentary in support of their respective case.

The case of the workmen in brief is as follows :

That in pursuance to the Railway Board's Circular dated 16-11-1984 the following percentages of up- gradation were sanctioned to the Drawing Staff of all Departments from 1-1-1984 .

25%

CDM

25%

HDM

30 %

ADM

20%

Total

100% 2265 [भाग ।।- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

phase-wise the total Nos . of posts created in different scales were as under :

Thatthe Drawing Cadres consisted of the following posts as on 1-4-84 :

CDM

(1)

Cadre

Revised

Existing

Increased as on 1-4-86, 87 & 89 HDM

(2)

2 + 1 + 1 4

CDM

(3)

5 10 5

2 + 1 + 2 = 5

HDM

ADM

(4)

3 + 1 + 26

DM 5 11 6

Tracers.

(5)

ADM

2 + 1 + 1 4

3 7 4

That the Board vide their letter dated 10-7-85 decided that the posts of Tracers wouldbe abolished gradually by converting the such posts to the Asstt. Draftsman within a period of 5 years and the posts of Asstt . Draftsman ( ADM ) would be the recruiting grade in the Drawing Cadre .

That the N.F. Railway Administration in reference to the Board's letter dated 16-11-84 filled up the above additional posts in terms of the policy spelled out replacing the selection rules with modified selection procedures as one time exemption and promoted the staff accordingly.

That the N.F. Railway Administration granted proforma promotions as sanctioned by the Board in their letter dated 16-11-84 and 25-6-85 but for manning the additional posts created , refused to pay the arrears of pay & allowances from the date of such creation of the posts .

That in the said letter Board further indicated that the process for filling up the up- graded posts due to be created on abolition of posts of Tracers and creation of equal Nos . of posts of ADMs vide para 5.1 appearing on page no . 2 of said letter , and entire process and follow- up- actions were to be taken in pursuance of the Board's original letter dated 16-11-84.

That the staff promoted against additional higher grade posts created including resultant vacancies occurred in the next below grade were to be paid :

That the restrictions imposed by the Board in Feb. 1987 that no incumbent can be promoted in the next higher grade unless he completed 2 years service in the substantive grade , cannot be applicable in this case since all the actions were taken in reference to the Board's letter dated 16-11-84 .

(i) The benefits of proforma promotion from 1-1-84.

(ii) Payments of arrears from 1-1-84 without taking into account the elements of shouldering higher responsibilities .

That there has been a clear departures from the policy by the GM ( P )/N.F. Railway/ Maligaon in denying the payment of arrears to the Drawing staff of the Signal Department working under Chief Signal & Telecommunication Engineer/N.F. Railway , Maligaon.

That the N.F. Railway Administration created the posts in different scales for the drawing staff as on 1-1-84 as under

25%

CDM

That by violating the policy decision of the Rly . Board the N.F. Rly . Administration have invited an unfair and arbitrary action to hit the articles of 14 , 16( 1 ) , 39 ( a ) and 309 of the Constitutional provisions .

5 posts

HDM

25%

= 5 posts

ADM

= 3 posts

That by denying the due benefits of arrears of pay and allowances of the proforma promotions given to the Drawing Staff of CSTE's office , the N.F. Railway Administration have violated the principles of natural justice.

= 18 posts

Onthe otherhand the case of the management in brief is as follows :

of18) (This excludes the posts of Tracers to the tune

That, the suit is not maintainable in present form in law as well as in fact and is liable to be dismissed . The Rail Mazdoor Union is not a recognised union on N.F. Railway and as per Railway Board's instruction there is no provisions for any kind of formal/ informal meeting/ discussion with the unrecognised union from the Rly . Administration's sides .

That the Rly . Board in their letter dated 7-11-90 elaborated the further actions to be taken on conversion ofTracers' posts as Asstt . Draftsman . The review was to be proceeded as on 1st April of each year in pursuance to the percentages prescribed in Board's letter 16-11-84 .

In fact , the Railway Board vide their letter dated 25-6-85 which was circulated by the C.P.O. N.F. Railway vide letter dated 10-7-85 to various Heads of Departments decided that the posts of Tracers will be promoted to the postof Junior Draftsman in scale of Rs . 330-560 in the fivedifferent manner .

That the Zonal Railway took up the matter and created the requisite Nos . of posts as per percentages prescribed in the Board's letter dated 16-11-84 and Memorandum was issued vide GM ( P)/ Maligaon's No. E/254/ 29 /N' Pt - 1 dated 3-7-91 and according to the said Memorandum on conversion of posts of Tracers to ADM 2266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

That instruction/ Guidlines issued by Rly . Board from time to time in regard annual review of Drg . Cadre after abolition of the posts of Tracers after converting into ADM have since been followed and benefits given to the eligible candidates at the relevant period .

That . Railway Board's letter No. PC - III / 84 / UPG/9 dated 16-11-84 clearly mentioned that for the purpose of restructuring the cadre strength as on 1-1-84 will be taken into account and will include Rest Giver and Leave Reserve posts ( para - 3 of the said letter) para - 4 of the said letter, it has clearly stated that " staff selected and posted against the Addl . high grade posts as a result of restructuring will have their pay fixed under rule - 2018- B( FR 226 ) R - II w.e.f. 1-1-84 . Their benefit of fixation effective from 1-1-84 will also be applicable to the chain/ resultant vacancy. In effect , the benefit of fixation from 1-1-84 should be given against all vacancies which arise from restructuring . Addl . posts as a result of annual cadre review taking into account the category of erstwhile Tracer abolished and formed as ADM cannot be treated as restructuring post and benefit proforma fixation has been given without payment of arrears .

That the Rly . Board's instructions were to abolish the cadre of Tracer within five years from 1-1-84 and after abolition of Tracer converted into ADM 5 years completed on 31-3-89 and annual review could be done in 1991 . Addl . posts as a result of annual review were to be fixed in as per normal rules and procedure in vogue . As such Rly. Board's instructions regarding residency period of 2 years in one grade before promotion to next grade was very much applicable as the posts were at directly as a result of restructuring and were filled in after receipt of Board's instructions .

In terms of GM ( P )/ MLG's Office Order No. E/254/ 29( W) Pt . I dated 4-6-92. Promotions of the CDM & HDM ofS & T Deptt . were extended proforma promotion against the post become available as a result of annual review . In the office order , it was clearly mentioned that their subsequent increment may be given without any benefit of arrear pay at the respective bill prepairing units such question of denial of arrear payment does not arise . The allegation brought against Rly . Administration regarding violation of constitution provision is baseless . The Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to dismiss the suit with cost.

Under the above facts and circumstances the management has prayed for dismissal of the reference with cost.

I have heard the argument advanced by learned counsel Mr. K.C. Sarma appearing for the management and Shri K.K. Biswas appearing for the Union. I have carefully scrutinised the entire evidences of the record , both oral and documentary .

Vide Ext. 'A' the Chief Personnel Officer of the N.F. Railway has sent the copy of Railway Board letter No. PC 111/84/UPG/9 dated 16-11-84 to all Heads of Departments , All DRMs , All Distt . and Asstt . Officers of Non- divisionalised officers and others by that Circular . The

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

Railway Board decided to review the cadre and restructure Group C & D staff of Railway . The post of Tracers were decided to be abolished and were to be up - graded in phase manner vide Ext. ` B` the Chief Personnel Officer sent the copies of Railway Board's Letter No. PC III / 84 /UPG / X 19 dated 25-6-85 to various Heads of Deptts . In that Railway Board letter dated 25-6-85 it was decided by the Board that the post of Tracer will be up - graded as junior draftsman in the Scale of Rs . 330-560 in 5 different manner . The existing cadre of Tracer is to be Frozen and actual requirement reviewed and determined with Board's approval within 6 months . The upgradation is to be done in the following pattern:

(i) Those who possess the diploma in Draftsmanship from recognised institutions will be upgraded as Junior Draftsman in scale ofRs . 330-560 .

(ii) Those who do not possess diploma in Draftsmanship but have completed 5 years of service as on 1-1-04 will be upgraded as junior Draftsman in scale of Rs . 330-560 .

(iii ) The balance non - qualified Tracers will be progressively promotedly upgrading their posts as junior Draftsman ( Rs . 330-560 ) as and when they complete 5 years of service or acquire the necessary qualification . The review will be done every six months commencing from 1-7-86 .

(iv) The vacancies which occur in the normal course in scale of Rs . 330-560 will continue to be filled as per existing pattern .

(v) After the entire cadre of the Tracers has been fully accompleted in the higher grade post of Junior Draftsman in scale of Rs . 330-560 , future vacancies in scale of Rs . 330-560 will be filled cent percent by direct recruitment of diploma holders in Draftsmanship .

It ismenifestly clear from the Railway Board Circulardated 25-6-85 ( Ext . B ) that an employee will get the benefit of retrospective fixation of pay only from date of promotion .It appears from Ext . ' C ' that the management gave the proforma promotion of drawing cadre of S & T Department ( Drawing side ) on 1-4-86 , 1-4-87 , 1-4-88 and 1-4-89 respectively against the post available as a result of review of the cadre . The circular was published on 4-6-92 and it was clearly mentioned in that circular that subsequent increment may be given to those employees who were given proforma promotion without any benefit of arrear pay .

For the purpose of restructuring the cadre strength as on 1-1-84 was to be taken into account and was to include Rest Giver and Leave Reserve posts . It is clear in para 4. I of Railway Board Circular dated 25-6-85 Ext . ' 1 ' and Ext . ' B ' that the staff selected and posted against the additional higher grade posts as a result of restructuring will have their pay fixed under Rule 2018 - B ( FR - 22C ) -RII w.e.f. 1-1-1984 on proforma basis

1 2267 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri R.C. Shukla

with current payments w.e.f. 1-1-85. The benefit of fixation will be applicable to the chain/ resultant vacancies which arise from restructuring .

Opponent: Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

It isa settled principle of law that an employee can claim benefit of a higher post only from the date when he joins in that post . He can not claim benefit of arrear pay from the date of his pro forma promotion . I have absolutely no hasitation to hold that the action of the management ofN.F. Railway by not granting the arrear to the Drawing Staff such as C.D.M. , H.D.M. , D.M. and A , D, M . was justified.

Award is given under may hand and seal on this 24th December, 2004.

D.C. CHOUDHURY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute, Act , praying that the opponent shall not change time bound promotion policy, in which a workman who completes six years of service in one post will get the promotion to next higher post. It is the say of the complainant that change of time bound promotion policy is a change of service condition. Hence prays that the opponent should be ordered to desist from any action of modifying R & P rules for electrical category and the service condition should not be change till the pending of reference case .

का. आ. 804.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 49/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025/ 29/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

S.O. 804.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M /s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[ No. L -30025/ 29/2005 - IR ( Misc . )] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that the Reference is pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal C.G.I.T.A. No. 201/04 as a Old I.T.C. No. 120/99 for adjudication . The management of O.N.G.C. trying to modify R & P rules without the consent of Electrical & Allied StaffAssociation . The action will change the service condition ofElectrical category workman who are involved in the reference . As per the present R & P rules after completing of six years , the workman is getting promotion to next higher post and it is the time bound promotion policy and it is also service condition of the workman . The management have intimated their intention of change of time bound policy to the union through conciliation officer vide file No. RLC/ AH /50 ( 1 )/2002 on 15/05/2002 a copy is enclosed as Annexure " B " . Thus the intention of change of time bound promotion policy is change of service condition as per section 9 - A and Schedule- IV of 1.D. Act, 1947. Thus it is prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal shall issue an order to opposite party to desist for any action of modifying R & P rules for electrical category workman without the consent of Electrical & Allied Staff Association and not to change the service condition till the Reference 120/04 is finalized .

3. A notice was issued to the opponent to file the Written Statement .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , LL.M. , Presiding Officer

Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 49/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 201/04

(Old Com . No. 3/03 in Ref. ( I. T. C. ) No. 120/99)

R.H. Patel

Mahesana - 384 002 .

C/ o ONGC Electrical & Allied Staff Association , 19. Pushpkunj Society, Near Sahkar Nagar, Complainant

1/s.

The Director (Personnel /HR) ,

ONGC Ltd. Telbhavan , Dehradun - 248 003 .

4. By Ex . 5 the opponent has filed the Written Stateinent . The brief facts are that complaint is not maintainable at law and the Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The complaint is ill founded and made on assumption . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the I.D. Act . The complainant is not concerned workman and alleged dispute is not connected with the main reference . Hence the complaint is required tobe dismissed . The complaint is not maintainable at law, as it is filed on the ground of apprehension - assumption . The subject matter of present complaint is not connected with the pending Reference ( ITC) No. 120/99. There is no such demand promotion in the main reference . The averments and contention made in the complaint are not true , hence denied by the opponent . It is denied that the management is trying to

Opponent

565 G1 /05-35 2268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 / PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

modify recruitment and promotion rules with the other union . It is the privilege of the management to change any rule . It is denied that there will be change of any service conditions of the complainant . The management calis recognized unions and ASTD for the discussion for changing the R & P regulations and the union is not recognized union and their union has not a legal right to say anything about R & P. The complainant has not produced any proof of contravention of Section 33 of the I.D. Act. Thus it is prayed that the complaint shouldbe dismissed with cost.

5. During the course of adjudication the representative of the complainant submitted a purshis by Ex . 6 and it is stated that the matter is settled with the management . Hence the present complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

6. Looking to the facts of this purshis Ex . 6 it is clear that the matter has been settled amicably and there is no grievance of the complainant regarding changing the R & P policy. Not only that the opponent has not committed any breach of section 33. Thus there is no violation of section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act by the opponent . Looking to the Ex . 6 this complaint becomes infructuous and does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of the fact of Ex . 6 the parties have amicable settlement regarding the subject matter of the complaint . Hence this complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 805.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -30025/28/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 805. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen . which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[No. 1-30025 /28 / 2005 - IR ( Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID . Under Secy .

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , LL.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 48/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.Τ.Α. Να . 201/04

Old Com. No. 2/03 in Ref. ( I , T. C. ) No. 120/99 | V.G. Mansuriya ,

Complainant C/o ONGC Electical & Allied Staff Association , 19. Pushpkunj Society . Near Sahkar Nagar , Mahesana- 384 002 . .

V/ s .

The Director ( Personnel/ HR ) ,

ONGC Ltd. , Telbhavan , Dehradun- 248 003 .

Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant Shri R.C. Shukla

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that the opponent shall not change time bound promotion policy, in which a workman who completes six years of service in one post will get the promotion to next higher post . It is the say of the complainant that change of time bound promotion policy is a change of service condition . Hence prays that the opponent should be ordered to desist from any action of modifying R & P rules for electrical category and the service condition should not be change till the pending of reference case .

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that the Reference is pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal C.G.I.T.A. No. 201/04 as a Old I.T.C. No. 120/99 for adjudication . The management of O.N.G.C. trying to modify R & P rules without the consent of Electrical & Allied Staff Association . The action will change the service condition of Electrical category workman who are involved in the reference . As per the present R & P rules after completing of six years , the workman is getting promotion to next higher post and it is the time bound promotion policy and it is also service condition of the workman . The management have intimated their intention of change of time bound policy to the union through conciliation officer vide file No. RLC/ AH / 50 ( 1 ) /2002 on 15/05/2002 a copy is enclosed as Annexure " B " . Thus the intention of change of time bound promotion policy is change of service condition as per section 9 - A and Schedule - IV of I.D. Act , 1947. Thus it is prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal shall issue an order to opposite party to lesist for any action of modifying R & P rules for electrical category workman without the consent of Electrical & Allied Staff [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन14, 1926

Association and not to change the service condition till the Reference 120704 is finalized .

3. A notice was issued to the opponent to file the Written Statement .

4. By Ex . 5 the opponent has filed the Written Statement . The brief facts are that complaint is not maintainable at law and the Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The complaint is ill founded and made on assumption . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section of the I.D. Act . The complainant is not concerned workman and alleged dispute is not connected with the main reference . Hence the complaint is required to be dismissed . The complaint is not maintainable at law , as it is filed on the ground of apprehension- assumption . The subject matter of present complaint is not connected with the pending Reference (ITC) No. 120/99 . There is no such demand promotion in the main reference . The averments and contention made in the complaint are not true , hence denied by the opponent . It is denied that the management is trying to modify recruitment and promotion rules with the other union . It is the privilege of the management to change any rule . It is denied that there will be change of any service conditions of the complainant . The management calls recognized unions and ASTD for the discussion for changing the R. & P. regulatiohs and the union is not recognized union and their union has not a legal right to say anything about R. & P. The complainant has not produced any proof of contravention of Section 33 of the I.D. Act . Thus it is prayed that the complaint should be dismissed with cost .

5. During the course of adjudication the representative of the complainant submitted a purshis by Ex. 6 and it is stated that the matter is settled with the management . Hence the present complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

6. Looking to the facts of this purshis Ex . 6 it is clear that the matter has been settled amicably and there is no grievance of the complainant regarding changing the R. & P. policy. Not only that the opponent has not committed any breach of section 33. Thus there is no violation of section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Actby the opponent : Looking to the Ex . 6- this complaint become infructuous and does not survive in law. Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view ofthe fact of Ex . 6 the parties have amicable settlement regarding the subject matter of the complaint . Hence this complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost.

B. 1. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005 का. आ. 806.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के

2269 बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचांट ( संदर्भ संख्या 47/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/27 /2005-आई. आर. (विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

S.O. 806.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[No. L- 30025/27/2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 48/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 201/04

Old Com . No. 1/03 in Ref. (1. T. C.) No. 120/99 | S.1 . Husen. ONGC Electical & Allied Staff Association , Mahesana Complainant

V/s .

The Director (Personnel/HR) . ONGC Ltd. Dehradun-248 003 .

Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri R.C. Shukla

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the industrial Disputes Act, praying that the opponent shall not change time bound promotion policy, in which a workman who completes six years of service in one post will get the promotion to next higher post. It is the say of the complainant that change of time bound promotion policy is a change of service condition . Hence prays that the opponent should be ordered to desist from any action of modifying R. & P. rules for electrical category and the service condition should not b change till the pending of reference case .

2270

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14、1926

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that the Reference is pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal C.G.I.T.A. No. 201/04 as Old I.T.C. No. 120/99 for adjudication. The management of O.N.G.C. trying to modify R & P. rules without the consent of Electrical & Allied Staff Association . The action will change the service condition of electrical category workman who are involved in the reference . As per the present R. & P. rules after completing ofsix years , the workman is getting promotion to next higher post and it is the time bound promotion policy and it is also service condition of the workman . The management have intimated their intention of change of time bound policy to the union through conciliation officer vide file No. RLC/AH/50 ( 1 ) /2002 on 15/05/2002 a copy is enclosed as Annexure " B " . Thus the intention of change of time bound promotion policy is change of service condition as per section 9 -A and Schedule- IV of I.D. Act , 1947. Thus it is prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal shall issue an order to opposite party to desist for any action of modifying R. & P. rules for electrical category workman without the consent of Electrical & Allied Staff Association and not to change the service condition till the Reference 120/04 is finalised .

3. A notice was issued to the opponent to file the Written Statement.

4. By Ex . 5 the opponent has filed the Written Statement . The brief facts are that complaint is not maintainable at law and the Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The complaint is ill founded and made on assumption . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the I.D. Act . The complainant is not concerned workman and alleged dispute is not connected with the main reference . Hence the complaint is required to be dismissed . The complaint is not maintainable at law , as it is filed on the ground of apprehensión - assumption . The subject matter of present complaint is not connected with the pending Reference ( ITC) No. 120/99 . There is no such demand promotion in the main reference . The averments and contention made in the complaint are not true , hence denied by the opponent . It is denied that the management is trying to modify recruitment and promotion rules with the other union. It is the privilege of the management to change any rule . It is denied that there will be change of any service conditions of the complainant . The management calls recoged unions and ASTD for the discussion for changing từ R. & P. regulations and the union is not recognized ton and their union has not a legal right to say anything about R. & P. The complainant has not produced any proof of contravention of Section 33 of the 1.D. Act . Thus it is prayed that the complaint should be dismissed with cost .

6. Looking to the facts of the purshis Ex . 6 it is clear that the matter has been settled amicably and there

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] is no grievance of the complainant regarding changing the R. & P. policy . Not only that the opponent has not committed any breach of section 33. Thus there is no violation of section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Actby the opponent . Looking to the Ex . 6 this complaint become infrctuous and does not survive in law . Hence 1 pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of the fact Ex. 6 the parties have amicable settlement regarding the subject matter of the complaint . Hence this complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost.

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 807.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 को 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ओ . एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 50/04) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[स. एल -30025 /30/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

S.O. 807. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s ONGC Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[No. L- 30025 /30 /2005 - IR ( Misc.) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. 1. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 50/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 201/04

[Old Com . No. 4/03 in Ref. (I. T. C. ) No. 120/99 | J. B. Bhavsar , C/ o ONGC Electrical & Allied Staff Association , 19. Pushpkunj Society , Near Sahkar Nagar , Mahesana-384002 . Complainant

Versus The Director (Personnel / HR) , ONGCLtd , Telbhavan , Dehradun- 248003 .

Opponent [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2271

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri R. C. Shukla

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act, praying that the opponent shall not change time bound promotion policy , in which a workman who completes six years of service in one post will get the promotion to next higher post . It is the say of the complainant that change of time bound promotion policy is a change of service condition. Hence prays that the opponent should be ordered to desist from any action of modifying R. & P. rules for electrical category and the service condition should not be change till the pending of reference case .

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that the reference is pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal C.G.I.T.A. No. 201/04 as a Old I.T.C. No. 120/99 for adjudication . The management of O.N.G.C. trying to modify R.& P. rules without the consent of Electrical & Allied Staff Association . The action will change the service condition ofElectrical category workman who are involved in the reference . As per the present R. & P. rules after complèting of six years , the workman is getting promotion to next higher post and it is the time bound promotion policy and it is also service condition of the workman . The management have intimated their intention of change of time bound policy to the union through conciliation officer vide file No. RLC/ AH /50( 1 )/2002 on 15-5-2002 a copy is enclosed as Annexure " B " . Thus the intention of change oftimebound promotion policy is change of service condition as per section 9 -A and Schedule - IV of I.D. Act , 1947. Thus its prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal shall issue an order to opposite party to desist for any action of modifying R & P rules for electrical category workman without the consent of Electrical & Allied Staff Association and not to change the service condition till the Reference 120/04 is finalised.

3. A notice was issued to the opponent to file the Written Statement .

4. By Ex . 5 the opponent has filed the Written Statement . The brief facts are that complaint is not maintainable at law and the Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The complaint is ill founded and made on assumption . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the I.D. Act . The complainant is not concerned workman and alleged dispute is not connected with the main reference . Hence the complaint is required to be dismissed . The complaint is not maintainable at law , as it is filed on the ground of apprehension-assumption . The subject matter of present complaint is not connected with the pending Reference ( ITC) No. 120/99 . There is no such demand promotion in the main reference . The averments and condition made in the complaint are not true , hence denied by the opponent. It is denied that the management is trying to modify recruitment and promotion rules with the other union . It is the privilege of the management to change any rule . It is denied that there will be change of any service conditions of the complainant . The management calls recognized unions and ASTD for the discussion for changing the R & P regulations and the union is not recognized union and their union has not a legal right to say anything about R & P. The complainant has not produced any proof of contravention of Section 33 of the I.D. Act . Thus it is prayed that the complaint should be dismissed with cost.

5. During the course of adjudication the representative of the complainant submitted a purshis by Ex. 6 and it is stated that the matter is settled with the management . Hence the present complaint may be disposed of accordingly.

6. Looking to the facts of this purshis Ex. 6 it is clear that the matter has been settled amicably and there is no grievance of the complainant regarding changing the R & P policy . Not only that the opponent has not committed any breach of section 33. Thus there is no violation of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act by theopponent . Looking to the Ex. 6 this complaint become infructuous and does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

Inview ofthe fact of Ex . 6 the parties have amicable settlement regarding the subject matter of the complaint. Hence this complaint is hereby disposed of . No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 808.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 51/04) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025/31/2005 -आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 808.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s ONGC Ltd. and their workman , 2272

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025/31 / 2005 - IR ( Misc. ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

of change of time bound promotion policy is change of service condition as per section 9 - A and Schedule - IV of I.D. Act , 1947. Thus it its prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal shall issue an order to opposite party to desist for any action of modifying R & P rules for electrical category workman without the consent of Electrical & Allied Staff Association and not to change the service condition till the Reference 120/04 is finalized .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

3. A notice was issued to the opponent to file the Written Statement .

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer

Com . C.G.J.Τ.Α. No. 51/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 201/04

Old Com . No. 5/03 in Ref. ( I. T. C.) No. 120/99 |

K.T. Patel

C/ o ONGC Electrical & Allied Staff Association , 19. Pushpkunj Society , Near Sahkar Nagar, Mahesana- 384002 .

Complainant

Versus

The Director ( Personnel/ HR ) , ONGC Ltd , Telbhavan , Dehradun-248003 .

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri R. C. Shukla

Opponent: Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

4. By Ex . 5 the opponent has filed the Written Statement . The brief facts are that complaint is not maintainable at law and the Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The complaint is ill founded and made on assumption . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the 1.D. Act . The complainant is not concerned workman and alleged dispute is not connected with the main reference . Hence the complaint is required to be dismissed . The complaint is not maintainable at law , as it is filed on the ground of apprehension-assumption . The subject matter of present complaint is not connected with the pending Reference ( ITC) No. 120/99. There is no such demand promotion in the main reference . The averments and contention made in the complaint are not true , hence denied by the opponent. It is denied that the management is trying to modify recruitment and promotion rules with the other union. It is the privilege of the management to change any rule . It is denied that there will be change of any service conditions of the complainant . The management calls recognized unions and ASTD for the discussion for changing the R & P regulations and the union is not recognized union and their union has not a legal right to say anything about R & P. The complainant has not produced any proof of contravention of Section 33 of the I.D. Act . Thus it is prayed that the complaint should be dismissed with cost .

5. During the course of adjudication the representative of the complainant submitted a purshis by Ex. 6 and it is stated that the matter is settled with the management . Hence the present complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the opponent shall not change time bound promotion policy. in which a workman who completes six years of service in one post will get the promotion to next higher post . It is the say of the complainant that change of time bound promotion policy is a change of service condition . Hence prays that the opponent should be ordered to desist from any action of modifying R. & P. rules for electrical category and the service condition should not be change till the pending of reference case .

6. Looking to the facts of this purshis Ex . 6 it is clear that the matter has been settled amicably and there is no grievance of the complainant regarding changing the R & P policy . Not only that the opponent has not committed any breach of section 33. Thus there is no violation of section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent. Looking to the Ex . 6 this complaint become infructuous and does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

Inview ofthe fact of Ex . 6 the parties have amicable settlement regarding the subject matter of the complaint . Hence this complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that the reference is pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal C.G.I.T.A. No. 201/04 as a Old I.T.C. No. 120/99 for adjudication . The marragement of O.N.G.C. trying to modify R. & P. rules without the consent of Electrical & Allied Staff Association . The action will change the service condition of Electrical category workman who are involved in the reference . As per the present R. & P. rules after completing of six years , the workman is getting promotion to next higher post and it is the time bound promotion policy and it is also service condition of the workman . The management have intimated their intention of change of time bound policy to the union through conciliation officer vide file No. RLC/ AH/ 50 ( 1 )/2002 on 15-05-2002 a copy is enclosed as Annexure " B " . Thus the intention

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer 2273 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

ORDER

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

का. आ. 809.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 254/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -30025/32/2005 - आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint. By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo .

S.O. 809. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s ONGCLtd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025 /32 /2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 254/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 215/04

Old Com . No. 208/03 in Ref. ( I. T. C.) No. 139/99 ]

Parmar Anilkumar Kantibhai ,

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.1.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should notbe change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

1 , Dattinagar Society , B /h . Railway Station , Kalol .

Complainant

Versus

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial DisputeAct and looking to the facts ofthe complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A ) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in laws. Hence I pass the following order :

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

ORDER

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-2004

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia 2274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 / PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 810.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 255/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025/33/2005 - आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005

S.O. 810. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court ,. Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s ONGC Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[No. L - 30025 /33/ 2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 255/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

Old Com . No. 209/03 in Ref. ( I. T. C. ) No. 139/99 | Shrimali Rajestkumar Kalidas

Dalitvas Post Adalaj ,

Tal . Dist . G.Nagar .

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions isin violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status- quo .

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statementby Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Honble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should notbe change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager, ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act by the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not surve in laws . Hence I pass the following order :

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent: Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

In view of Ex . 11 the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer [ भाग ।। - खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 811.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ . एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधत्तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 256/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -30025/34/2005- आई . आर. (विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 811.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . ONGCLtd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 9-2-2005 .

[No. L - 30025/ 34/2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT:

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 256/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

[ Old Com . No. 210/03 in Ref. ( I. T. C. ) No. 139/99 | Parmar Rajnikant Dhaneshkumar,

26, Siddharthnagar Society,

Somanth Road , Mehsana ,

2275

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status- quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statementby Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4 During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint maybe disposed of accordingly .

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avam Bhavan , Almedabad .

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Exs . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Exs . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that 565 G1 /05-36

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33( A ) of the Industrial Disputes Actby the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not surve in laws. Hence I pass the following order:

ORDER

In view of Ex . 11 the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad .

Date 17-11-2004

B. I KAZI , Presiding Officer 2276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[ PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 812.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ . एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 257/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2--2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025/ 35/2005 - आई . आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permarrent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying in change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the service the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

S.O. 812. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 9-2-2005.

[No. L - 30025 / 35 /2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint isnot maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable. Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference, i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly.

Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 257/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

[ Old Com . No. 211/03 in Ref. (I. T. C.) No. 139/99]

Sutaria Vikram Somchandbhai ,

24, Narottampark Society, B/ H . Amrapali Cinema, Gomtipur, Ahmedabad .

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

ORDER

Opponent: Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

In view of Ex . II the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-2004

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer 2277 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005

the act of the opponent changing his service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

का. आ. 813.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 258/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025/ 36/2005 - आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act ofthe opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 ofthe complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo .

S.O. 813.ln pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025/36/2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable. Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer

Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 258/04 in Reference No.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.1.T.A. No. 215/04 (old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

C.G.L.T.A. No. 215/04

|Old Com . No. 212/03 in Ref. ( I. T. C.) No. 139/99 ]

Parmar Surendrabhai Babubhai ,

PostDhumasan , Tal , Kadi , Dist. Mehsansa .

Complainant

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 ( A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in laws . Hence 1 pass the following order :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

ORDER

Opponent: Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

In view of Ex . 11 the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost ,

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer 2278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 / PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 814.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 143 की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार , औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 259/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025/37/2005 आई . आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड , अवर र्साचव

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference J.T.C. No. 139/99. He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of coinplainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and iiiegai . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint. By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo .

5.0 . 814.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . O.N.G.C Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05

[No. L - 30025/37/ 2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L..M . , Presiding Officer

Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 259/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

[Old Com . No. 213/03 in Ref. ( I. T. C.) No. 139/99 ]

Rakesh Dudhbhai Parmar ,

B-120 , Saraswatinagar , IOC Road , Chandkheda ,

Tal . Dist G'nagar .

Complainant

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Versus

Group Leneral Manager ,

ONGC . Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in laws . Hence I pass the following order :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

ORDER

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

1 The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2279

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 815.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 260/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -30025/38/ 2005 - आई आर ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 815.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M /s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L- 30025/38/ 2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 260/04 in -Reference No. C.G.L.T.A. No. 215/04

|Old Com . No. 214/03 in Ref. (L.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ] Makwana Natvarbhai Somabhai , PostSahij , Vankar Vas , Tal . Kalol Distt .: G'nagar

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act ofthe opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary .Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status- quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable. It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly .

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial DisputeAct and looking to the facts ofthe complaint there is no violation of Section 33 ( A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 816.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक 2280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 261/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-30025/39/2005 - आई आर ( विविध ) ] बी. एम . डेविड, जैवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo .

S.O. 816. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025/39/2005 - IR (Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy .

3. The opponentnent has subsubmitted the Written Statementby Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( Old No. 139/99 ) , the presentcomplaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L. L.M. , Presiding Officer

Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 261/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

[Old Com . No. 215/03 in Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ]

Parmar Jayeshkumar Nananbhai , B- 136 , Sarwastinagar , IOC Road , Chandkheda , Distt .: G'nagar Complainant

Versus

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33( A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the Opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order:

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad

Opponent

ORDER

APPEARANCES :

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer ORDER

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

का. आ. 817.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 262/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025/40/2005- आई . आर. (विविध) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव 2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2281

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005 S.O. 817. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L -30025/40/ 2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L. L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. Νο . 262/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

[Old Com . No. 216/03 in Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99] Leuva Pankajbhai Laljibhai , At& Post , Sardhav ,

Distt.: G'nagar .

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ), the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly.

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No: 215/04 as per Exs . 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Exs . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad .

ORDER

... Opponent

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99. He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

In view of Ex . 11 the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 818.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 263/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/41/2005 - आई. आर . ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 818.-in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workman , 2282

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[No. L - 30025/41 /2005 - IR ( Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable. Hence it is prayedthat the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L. L.M. , Presiding Officer

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.1.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous. The complaint maybe disposed of accordingly.

Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 263/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 215/04

Old Com. No. 217/03 in Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ]

Makavana Jyantibhai Danabhai .

10/20 , Laxminagar Society, Gujarat Housing Board, Chandhheda ,

Distt.: G'nagar.

Complainant

Versus

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 ( A) of the Industrial DisputesActby the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence 1 pass the following order:

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad.

Opponent

ORDER

APPEARANCES :

In view of Ex . 11 the complaint is hereby disposed of . No order as to cost.

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04

B. 1. KAZI , Presiding Officer ORDER

नई दिल्ली , 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 819.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ओ.एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 264/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

( सं. एल 30025/42/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड , अवर राधिव

New Dellii , the 9th February , 2005

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference 1.1.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.Ci.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo .

S.O. 819 .--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statementby Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no

[No. L - 30025/42/ 2005 - IR ( Misc. ) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2283

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 264/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

| Old Com . No. 218/03 in Ref. (I.T.C.) No. 139/99] Makwan Prakash Kumar , 7, Jawahar Society, B /h . Railway Station ,

Kalol .

Complainant

V/ s.

Group General Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99. He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status- quo .

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

565 Gi/ 05-37

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly .

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

Inview of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officers नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 820.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 265/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/43/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

S.O. 820.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L -30025/43/2005 - IR ( Misc. ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer 2284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 265/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.Α. No. 215/04

Old Com . No. 219/03 in Ref. ( I.T.C.) No. 139/99 ] Barot Sahileshkumar Prakesh Kumar ,

Kaligam,

Ahmedabad.

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager, ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent: Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary.Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status- quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous. The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the finaldisposal of that reference .

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order:

ORDER

In view of Ex . 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04 B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 821.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 266/04) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/44/2005- आई . आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005 S.O. 821. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of. M/ s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was receivedby the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[ No. L - 30025/44/2005 - IR ( Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 266/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

Old Com . No. 220/03 in Ref. ( I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ] Ghanshyam R. Jaiswal , Shyamalbhai ni Chali , Kaligam Sabarmati , Ahmedabad.

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent [भाग - खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

2285

ORDER

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04

ORDER

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. Department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal. Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workman . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference, i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of acoordingly .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint doesnot survive in law . Hence I pass the following order:

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 822.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों कें बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 267/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/45/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

S.O. 822. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court.. Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L- 30025/45/2005 - IR ( Misc .) B. M. DAVID , Under Secy

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 267/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.Α. No. 215/04

(Old Com . No. 221/03 in Ref. (1.T.C. ) No. 139/99 )

Complainant Kodar Singh S. Rathod , 745, Gujarat Housing Board, Chandkheda , Distt. Gandhinagar.

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia 2286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. Department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary.Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly.

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Exs . 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Exs . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should notbe change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of Ex. 11 the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI . Presiding Officer

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 823.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ . एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 268/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/46/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005

S.O. 823. In pursuancersuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025/46/2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 268/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

[Old Com . No. 222/03 in Ref. ( I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ] Christan Johnson Rajnikant , 10 , Jaitum Park Society , Maninagar, Ahmedabad. Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia ORDER

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the service is the permission of the Tribunal isnecessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint. By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Honble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workman. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should notbe change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial DisputesAct by the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law. Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of Annexure the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Dated : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 824.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ . एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या

2287 269/04) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025/47/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 824.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[No. L - 30025/47/2005 - IR ( Misc. ) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 269/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

[ Old Com . No. 223/03 in Ref. (I.T.C.) No. 139/99 ] Dinesh Kalidas Solanki , Sahij Tal , Kalol ,

Complainant Distt. Gandhinagar.

Versus

Group General Manager, ONGC , Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14, 1926

opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo .

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workman . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Actby the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law. Hence I pass the following order:

ORDER

In view of Annexure the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Dated : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 825.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 270/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/48/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

S.O. 825.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[No. L - 30025/48/ 2005 - IR ( Misc. ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 270/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 215/04

[Old Com . No. 224/03 in Ref. (I.T.C.) No. 139/99 |

Complainant Chaudhary Dipak Kumar Punjabhai , B-116, Shantikunj Society, IOC Road , Chandkheda , Distt . Gandhinagar .

Versus

Group General Manager,

ONGC , Ahmedabad Project,

Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad . Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the oppnnent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and

1 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2289

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo .

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workman . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly.

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 ( A) of the Industrial Dispute Actby the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law. Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of Annexure the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 826.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 271/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/49/2005- आई . आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 826. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025/ 49/2005 - IR ( Misc.) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L : M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 271/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

(Old Com . No. 225/03 in Ref. ( I.T.C.) No. 139/99 ) Parmar Ashok Manilal , Sertha Post , Kasturinagar, Dist. Gandhinagar .

... Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status- quo.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer

Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 272/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

(Old Com . No. 226/03 in Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99) 4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint imay be disposed off accordingly.

Dinesh Fulabhai Chauhan , Naz . Tal Daskroi ,

Dist. Ahmedabad .

Complainant

Versus

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Alımedabad. Opponent

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial DisputesActby the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of Annexexure the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 827.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ओ. एन . जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 272/04) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025 /50/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference J.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He isdenied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status- quo.

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005

S.O. 827. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

[No. L - 30025 / 50/2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2291

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

that in view of order passed in Main Reference, i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( Old No. 139/99), the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial DisputesAct by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of Annexure the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 828.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेडके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 273/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/51/2005 - आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 828.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L- 30025 /51 /2005 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer 565G1/05-38

Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 273/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

[Old Com. No. 227/03 in Ref. ( I.T.C.) No. 139/99 ] Gautambhai Jethabhai Parmar, C/33 , Indira Nagar , Motera Road, Sabarmati , Ahmedabad .

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad.

Opponent APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint. By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint maybedisposed of accordingly .

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.1.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present 2292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference.

ORDER

In view of Annexure the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad

Date: 17-11-04

B.I FAZI. Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 829.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 274/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -30025 /52/2005- आई . आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005 S.O. 829. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025'52/ 2005 - IR ( Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 274/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

Old Com . No. 228/03 in Ref. (1.T.C.) No. 139/99 / Solanki Vinodbhai Devsibhai .

Veljibhai no Kuvo ,

C/33 , Indira Nagar , Motera Road,

Sabarmati , Ahmedabad .

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] APPEARANCES :

Complainant Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent: Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint. By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim appiication and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager.

ONGC , Ahmedabad Project .

Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 ( A) of the Industrial Disputes Act by the Opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence 1 pass the following order:

Opponent

2293 [ भाग 11-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

ORDER

In view of Annexure the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. 1. KAZI , Presiding Officer

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 830.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 275/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025 /53/2005 - आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference 1.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status- quo.

S.O. 830.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L- 30025 /53 /2005 - IR ( Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous. The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer

Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 275/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

(Old Com. No. 229/03 in Ref . (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 )

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Complainant

Rathod Jaswantbhai Laljibhai , 9 New Ashoknagar Society , Rajpur , Gomtipur , Ahmedabad .

Versus

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Actby the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

Group General Manager,

ORDER

ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhawan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

In view of Annexure the complain is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Ahmedabad Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presidin , fficer Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia 2294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 831.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 276/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/54/2005- आई . आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005 S.O. 831. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025/ 54/2005 - IR ( Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. 1. Kazi , B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 276/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

(Old Com . No. 230/03 in Ref. ( I.T.C.) No. 139/99) Rathod Nareshbhai Jaswantbhai ,

Sertha . Post Kastrinagar .

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] isin violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status- quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable. It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable. Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

Complainant

Distt. Gandhinagar.

Versus

Gros General Manager,

ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhawan , Ahmedabad .

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent: Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions 6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Actby the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of Annexure the complaint is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 832.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ . एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 277/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/ 55/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]

2295 the act of the opponent changing his service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005 S.O. 832. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 277/04) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025/ 55/2005 - IR ( Misc. ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. 1. Kazi , B.Sc. , LL.M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 277/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

[Old Com . No. 231/03 in Ref. (I.T.C.) No. 139/99 ] Dipakkumar R. Khatri ,

Sahebpura Chali , Bhutbungla ,

Jawahar Chowk , Sabarmati , Ahmedabad.

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference 1.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary .Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workman . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly .

Complainant

Versus

Group General Manager ,

ONGC , Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhawan , Ahmedabad .

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that 6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act by the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

ORDER

In view of Annexure the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost.

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer 2296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.

का. आ. 833.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओ. एन. जी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 278/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30025/56/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2005

2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. Department . The complainant and other workmen have raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99. He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo.

S.O. 833. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 278/04) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s O.N.G.C. Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 30025/56/2005 - IR ( Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

3. The opponentonent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workman . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. I. Kazi , B.Sc. , LL.M. , Presiding Officer

Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 278/04 in Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04

4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may bedisposed of accordingly .

[Old Com . No. 232/03 in Ref. (I.T.C.) No. 139/99 ]

Jayntibhai Natubhai Patel , At Dhamasan Tal . Kalol . Distt. Gandhinagar ,

Ahmedabad.

Complainant

5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Exs . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Exs. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .

Versus

Group General Manager , ONGC , Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhawan , Ahmedabad.

Opponent

APPEARANCES :

6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial DisputesAct by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does notsurvive in law . Hence I pass the following order :

Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya

ORDER

Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia

ORDER

In view of Annexexure the complaint is hereby disposed of. No order as to cost .

Ahmedabad

Date : 17-11-04

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his service conditions

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2297

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 834.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार लंजीबरना लाइम स्टोन माईन्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 63/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-29011/6/2002- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005 S.O. 834. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 63 / 2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Lanjiberna Lime Stone Mines and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 29011 /6/2002 - IR (Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

PRESENT :

Shri N.K.R. Mohapatra , Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court , Bhubaneswar .

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO . 63/2002 Date of Passing Award-24th January, 2005 BETWEEN

The Management of:

1. The Chief Mines Manager, Lanjiberna Limestone Mines of ICL India Ltd. , At./Po . Lanjiberna , Dist . Sundargarh, Orissa .

2. M/s . Vaibhav Heavy Vehicles Limited, Contractor, At./Po . Lanjiberna, Dist . Sundargarh , Orissa .

3. M/ s . Bhagwati Mines , Contractor,

At./Po . Lanjiberna , Dist . Sundargarh , Orissa .

1st Party-Management .

AND

Their Workmen represented through the President , Lanjiberna Shramik Sangh,

At/Po. Lanjiberna , Dist . Sundargarh , Orissa.

2nd Party-Workmen .

APPEARANCES :

None. For the 1st Party-Management

Forthe 2nd Party-Workmen None. AWARD

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour in exercise ofPowers conferred by Clause (d) ofsub -section (1) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L-29011/6/2002 /IR (M) , dated 07-05-2002 :-

"Whether the demand of M/s . Lanjiberna Shramik Sangh, Lanjiberna for regularization of 12 numbers ofdumper drivers and operators (as per Annexure) by M/s . OCL India Limited, Lanjiberna Limestone Mines, who were working since 1986 continuously through M/ s . Bhagwati Mines is justified ? If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to ?" LIST OF THE WORKERS OF M/ s. BHAGWATI MINERS

Sl . No.

Designation Name of the Workers (S./Sri)

Soma Sekhar Nair

Heavy Equipment Operator 01 .

02.

-do-

Aviram Kerketta

Joseph Ekka

03. Quarry Equipment Operator

04. Dilip Kumar Pandey Asst. Quarry Equip . Operator

-do-

05 . CyrilDungDung

06.

-do-

Devanand Singh

-do-

07. Karlus Kindo

-do-

08 . Jainath Bhagat

-do-

09. Gabriel Minz

10. Abraham Kandulna Heavy Equip . Operator

11. Madhu Patro

-do-

12. Justin Minz

-do-

On repeated notice being sent the President , Lanjiberna. Shramik Sangh , the representative of the workmen, neither turned up nor did he file any statement of claim in support of his case. On the other hand, he filed a petition dated 16th June , 2003 stating to have resolved the dispute with the Management and as such intended not to proceed with the case . The representative ofthe principal employer, Lanjiberna Limestone Mines of OCL India Limited also agreed to have resolved the dispute with the workers Union and as such there appears no dispute between the parties , the same having been resolved as contended by the principal employer and the President , Lanjiberna Shramik Sangh .

3. Hence , no dispute award is passed .

N. K. R. MOHAPATRA , Presiding Officer 2298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

This reference was made by the Central Government of India as per letter No. L -35011 / 6 / 98 /IR ( M) dated 5-2-1999 . The dispute is between the Management of M/ s . United Stevedores Association of Cochin (P) Ltd. , and their workmen . The dispute referred is :

का. आ. 835.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स यूनाईटेड स्टीवडोरस् एसोसिएशन ऑफ कोचीन ( प्रा. ) लि. , कोचीन स्टीमर एजेन्ट्स एसोसिएशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारोंके बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय, अर्नाकुलम के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या 7/1999( सी ) ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-35011/6/1998- आई. आर. ( एम. ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the managements of Cochin Steamer Agents Association and United Stevedores Association of Cochin (P) Ltd. , Cochin is justified innot associating the union viz . United Employees Association . in their bilateral discussion including discussion on charter of demands and rationalisation ofmanning scale of the workers ? If not , to what relief the union is entitled to ?"

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005

2. The above reference was accepted to file and issued summons to the parties . The parties appeared before court and the union filed a claim statement . Thereafter the management filed written statement . But when the caseis posted today on 22-12-04 the counsel for the union submitted that he has no instruction from his party. Union called absent . Therefore I think that the union/ workman isnot at all interested to pursue the disputse any further and that no industrial dispute is pending to be adjudicated.

S.O. 835. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award [ Ref. No. 7/ 1999 (c) ] of the Labour Court , Ernakulanı as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ S. United Stevedores Asson. of Cochin (P) Ltd. , Cochin Steamer Agents Association and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 10-02-2005 .

[No. L - 35011/6 / 1998 -IR (M) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

In the result, the reference is answered holding that there is no subsisting industrial dispute between the parties to be adjudicated upon.

ANNEXURE

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant transcribed and typed out by her, corrected by me and passed this the 22nd day of December , 2004 .

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM

( IN THE LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM)

This award will take effect one month after its publication in the Official Gazette .

(Wednesday, the 22nd day of December , 2004)

PRESENT :

Ernakulam , K. K. UTHARAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

Smt . K. K. Utlıaran , B. Sc . , LL.B .. Presiding Officer

Industrial Dispute No. 7 of 1999 ( Central )

BETWEEN

The president , Cochin Steamer Agents Association, M/ S United Stevedores Association . Cochin (P ) Ltd. , Willington Island , Cochin - 682003 .

का. आ. 836.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 27/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । AND

[सं. एल-22012/32/2002- आई. आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005 The workman of the above concern represented by the General Secretary, United Employees Association . Fletcher Building. Willington Island.

REPRESENTATIONS :

Sri B. S. Krishnan Associates . Advocates , Warriam Road , Kochi - 16 For Management

Sri . Jacob Chacko ,

S.O. 836. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 27/2002 ) of the Central Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of ECL and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 9-02-2005.

Advocate , Market Road .

Kochi - 11 .

.... For Workman

[No. L - 22012/ 32/ 2002 - IR ( CM - II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL PRESENT :

Sri Md . Sarfaraz Khan , Presiding Officer .

REFERENCE NO . 13 OF 2002

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of Pandeshwar Colliery of M/ s . ECL . , Distt . Burdwan (WB) . ....Management

Vrs.

Sri Baleshwar Yadav, Ex - Timber Mistry, represented by the Chief General Secretary , Koyala Mazdoor Congress , Asansol . Workman REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management : Sri P. K. Das , Advocate .

For the Workman : Sri S. K. Pandey, General (Union) Secretary, K.M.C. , Asansol .

STATE : WEST BENGAL INDUSTRY : COAL

2299

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, -1926

company which was written as 1-7-1936 and had requested the management to correct his date of birth as 1-7-1943 according the C.M.P.F. records .

4. The further case of the union is that the management arbitrarily assessed his age as 48 years as on 18-7-1988 i.e. 18-7-1940 . Sri Baleshwar Yadav again protested against this assessment , as this was not done according to the medical jurisprudence and the other records of the company such as CMPF records etc. were also not taken into consideration at the time of their assessment .

5. It is also the case of the union that the higher management of the company conceded to his demand , approved assessment of his age through an Apex Medical Board and fixed up a date of 14-8-1992 for the same . Since the workman concerned was on leave on the particular date, he could not appear before the Apex Medical Board and accordingly he informed the management and requested to the management for fixing another date for assessment of his age . But this was not done. The matter was kept pending for years together and ultimately he was forcefully superannuated w.e.f. 18-7-2000 which is quite illegal and unjustified. So a relief has been sought praying therein to direct the management to refer the case of Baleshwar Yadav to the Apex Medical Board for assessment of his age and to pay the workman his full back wages w.e.f. 18-7-2000 .

Dated 15-12-2004

AWARD

In exercise of the power conferred by clause (d ) of Sub- Section ( 1 ) and Sub - Section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Govt. of India, through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 22012/ 134/2001 - IR ( CM - II) dated 12-06-2002 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Pandaveshwar Colliery of M/ s . Eastern Coalfields Ltd. in not referring the case of Sri Baleswar Yadav, Ex . Timber Mistry , to the Apex Medical Board for assessment of his age and forcefully superannuating him from service on 18-7-2000 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

2. In pursuance to the summons issued through the Registered Postby the Tribunal both the concerned parties to the dispute appeared through their representatives and filed their separate sets of written statement in support of their respective claims .

3. The case of the workman concerned in brief compass as set- forth in his written statement is that Sri Baleshwar Yadav, Ex -Timber Mistry is the permanent employee of Pandaveshwar Colliery of M/s . Eastern Coalfields Ltd. He had objected in the year 1987 to the wrong recording of his date of birth in the records of the 565 G1/05-39

6. On the other hand the case of the management inshort is that the instant reference as raised by the union over the terms of reference is entirely misconceived one and the same does not come under the scope of the I.D. , Act.

7. The main case of the management is that the workman had raised the dispute through S.R.F. supplied to him in the year 1987 as per norms and 1.1 . No. 76, the case of Sri Yadav was referred to the age determination committee and his age was assessed as 48 years as on 18-7-1988 and the same was communicated to the workman vide letter No. Pand/Age/Assessment/ 88 / 8 : dated 1-2-1989 . There after the workman concerned again made a representation for re - assessment of his age by challenging earlier age assessed and he was again given an opportunity by the inanagement to appear before the Apex Medical Board on 14-8-1992 at 9.00 A.M. but he did not appear before the Medical Board for his age assessment . So in view of the facts and circumstances the management has prayed to hold that the action of the management is totally justified and the workman concerned is not entitled to any relief after his superannuation from service.

8. On perusal of the record it transpires that the case was fixed for hearing argument but in the mean time a petition was filed by the learned lawyer of the management jointly signed by the representative of both sides. It is stated in the said joint petition that the matter may be disposed of by directing the management to refer the concerned employee to the Apex Medical Board for determination of his age as per guidance of 1.1 . No. 76 of J.B.C.C.I.

2300

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

Coalfields Ltd. and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 09-02-2005 .

[ No. L - 22012 / 134/2001 - IR ( CM - II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT :

Sri Md . Sarfaraz Khan , Presiding Officer.

REFERENCE NO . 27 OF 2002

PARTIES :

Management

M/ s . ECL . , P.O. Kalipahari , Distt. Burdwan ( WB) .

9. It is the admitted fact that an opportunity by the management was given to the workman to appear before the Apex Medical Board on 14-8-1992 at 9.00 A.M. but the workman concerned did not appear before the Apex Medical Board for his age assessment . It is the definite case of the union that since the workman was on leave on that particular date so he could not appear before the Apex Medical Board and in this regard he had informed the management and requested for fixing another date for assessmen of his age . This fact has not been controverted by the management in his pleading rather the management is silent on this point which go to support the claim of the union The management should have considered the cogent ground of the absence of the delinquent employee and should have given an opportunity to appear before the Apex Medical Board for his age assessment as the workman was entitled for the same .

The Agent. Kalipahari ( R) Colliery , .... Vrs.

Sri Chota Kailash Paswan . Security Guard , Damra Colliery, ( Bengal Coal Damra) , P.O. Kalipahari , Distt . Burdwan . ......Workman

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management : None .

10. However in the light of the facts circumstances of the case and the joint submission made by the representatives of both sides . I am satisfied to hold that it is a fit case which must be referred to the Apex Medical Board for the determination of the age of the delinquent employee as per the spirit of the instruction No. 76 of J.B.C.C.1 . Implementation Report . And as such it is hereby.

For the Workman

ORDERED

: Sri S. K. Pandey . General Secretary, K.M.C. , Asansol , Distt . Burdwan.

INDUSTRY : COAL

STATE WEST BENGAL

Dated 15-12-2004

AWARD

that let the management be directed to refer the delinquent employee to the Apex Medical Board for determination of his age within 15 days of the receipt of this award . The finding of the Apex Medical Board shall be final and binding upon both the parties. Accordingly the award be and the same is passed and the reference is. disposed of.

Copiesof the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour at the earliest for information and needful .

MD. SARFARAZ KHAN , Presiding Officer

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . Government of India , through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 22012/ 32/ 2002 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 05-08-2002 has beenpleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal .

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Damra Colliery under Sripur Area of M / s . ECL in dismissing Sh . Chota Kailash Paswan , Security Guard w.e.f. 9-4-1996 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? " का. आ. 837.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ई . सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-22012/134/2001- आई . आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005

2. After receipt of the aforesaid order of reference summons were issued to the respective parties through the Registered Post . Having received the summon A. Chakraverty , Advocate representing the union appeared and filed the written statement on behalf of the workman butinspite of service of the summons for the management nobody turned up to represent the management on 13-01-2003 and then the case was pending for the appearance of the management. Again a fresh notice was issued on 27-5-2004 , but in spite of several adjournments the management did not turn up and ultimately the case was fixed for ex- parte hearing which was taken up for ex- parte hearing on 15-12-2004 .

S.O. 837. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 13/2002 ) of the Central Govt. Indus . Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s . Eastern 2301 [ भाग II - खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

3. In brief compass the case of the workman concerned as per his written statement is that Sh . Chota Kailash Paswan has been working as a permanent Security Guard at Damra Colliery since long with unblemished record of service. The local management is claimed to be very much biased and prejudiced against the concerned workman and with an ulterior motive to victimise the concerned workman a false and frivolous charge-sheet dated 29-2-1996 was issued on the allegation that he absented from duty on 28-2-1996 . He was also suspended with immediate effect .

colleague available during the relevant time as there was no any other security guard on duty. This act of absence for an hour from duty under the compelling circumstance beyond the control of the workman may not amount to a gross misconduct demanding dismissal of the employee . Ido find force in the argument of the workman side and the grounds of absence appears to be satisfactory and reasonable . The management in spite of repeated issuance ofnotices by registered post and even having received the notices twice did not care to attend the Court to defend its casewhich led to the ex -parte hearing of the dispute. There is no material available on the record to contradict the contention of the union side. The fairness and validity of the enquiry proceeding and non - issuance of the second show cause before passing any punishment for the alleged misconduct has been challenged and there is none to answer and meet the challenge either on the facts or legal points. From the side of the management itself . These all facts go to show that the principles of natural justice has been ignored and the same has been violated .

4. The main case of the workman is that the allegation as levelled in the charge - sheet does not constitute any misconduct and the charge- sheet was issued by an un - authorised person . The enquiry is also claimed to be conducted in ulter violation of the principles of natural justice through a biased and prejudiced enquiry officer and even no charge is established against the workman . The workman has been dismissed at the hands of an un -authorised person . Besides this neither the copy ofthe enquiry report and proceedings were supplied prior to the dismissal of the workman concerned nor any second show cause notice was issued . The dismissal order is also challenged to be too harsh and against the provision of the certified standing order of the company on the aforesaid facts the workman has sought a relief praying therein to set a side the dismissal order and to re - instate the workman with full back wages with the continuity of the service .

8. Inview of the above facts , circumstance materials available on the record and the discussion made . I anı satisfied to hold that the punishment of dismissal for the alleged misconduct under the compelling circumstance and without any mala fide intention is not just and proper rather the same is too harsh which is totally disproportionate to the alleged misconduct even in case it would have been proved. And such the order of dismissal ofthe delinquent workman is hereby set a side and he is. directed to be re - instated with the continuity of the service along with the full back wages . Accordingly it is hereby

ORDERED

5. From perusal of the record it transpires that some photo copies ofthe documents have been filed by the side of the workman. Copies of the two charge-sheets dated 29-2-96 & 1-3-96 . Reply of both the said charge-sheets . Copy of the enquiry report . Copy of the letter dated 29-3-96 sent by the Agentto the workman and the copy of the reply of the said letter dated 29-3-96 have been filed .

that let an ex - parte award be and the same is passed . Copies of the award be send to the Ministry of Labour for information and needful . The reference is accordingly disposed of.

MD. SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी, 2005

6. During the course of argument it was submitted by the workman side that on 28-2-96 the workman concerned had been out for half an hour answer the call of nature after intimatings his colleague Sri Ramakant Ojha who informed the manager also.It is further submitted that on 1-3-96 he had been to the Acting Manager requesting him to remove suspension but without listening him he became furious and used filthy language which led to alteration .

का. आ. 838.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एन. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 68/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-22012/133/ 2001- आई. आर . ( सी.एस.- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th February . 2005

S.O. 838. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. 68/2002 ) of the Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court . Kanpur ( U.P. ) as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Northern Coalfields 7. On perusal of the record and the documents filed by the workman side it is clear that the delinquent employee was on duty on 28-2-96 in the second shift at the colliery cash office and at about 7.30 P.M. to 8.30 P.M. on 28-2-96 he had been to answer the call of natural towards the river side . He had intimated his colleague Ramakant Ojha who had informed the Manager in this regard during the course of inspection at the relevant time . The absence of the workman during the relevant time of inspection to answer the call of nature intimating his colleague , can't be said be deliberate . It is not possible to take permission or to intimate the management specially when the workman was under pressure to answer the call of nature . He had no alternative but to intimate his 2302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

Ltd. , and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-2005 .

[No. L - 22012/ 133/ 2001 - IR ( CM - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA , PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, SARVODAYA NAGAR, KANPUR , U.Þ.

Industrial Dispute No. 68 of 2002 In the matter of dispute between :

The President Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress H.O. Water Board Colony Harminder Road. Hirapur, Dhanbad ( Bihar)

AND

The General Manager Northern Coalfield Limited. Khadia Project Khadia . Khadia Post Office , District Sonebhadra , U.P.

AWARD

1 Central Government , Ministry of Labour, vide notification No. L- 22012/ 133 /2001-( IR ( CM - II) dt . 23-8-02 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal : -

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Northern Coalfield Ltd. in dismissing Sh . P. N. Sachan from services is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to ?

2. In the instant case, the case after exchange of pleadings was fixed for evidence of parties . For this purposes repeated opportunities were grantedto the contesting parties and notices in this regard have also been sent to the parties concerned . The concerned workman on few dates attended the proceedings of the case and made his initials on the order sheet itself. One such order sheet is of date 22-10-03 and in his presence the case was directed to come up for evidence on 19-2-04 On 26-5-04 when the case was taken up for hearing it was found that the workman is absent , however it is made clear that on previous date i.c. 26-5-2004 the workman was present and received the copy of the reply filed by the management . After 26-5-04 the concerned workman stopped coming in the case nor ever sent any application.

On 14-7-04 when the case was taken up for hearing and evidence of the parties , once again the workman was found absent . hence the workman was debarred from evidence . The representative for the management was also present and he made an endorsement on the ordersheet that employer too has not to adduce any evidence as the workman has not lead any

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] evidence in the case . The case was then posted for arguments on 13-10-04.

4. Therefore from the above it is obvious that the present case virtually a case of no evidence inasmuch as the concerned workman or the union espousing the case on his behalf have palpably failed to adduce evidence in support of the case . Under these circumstances the tribunal is left with no other option but to hold that the concerned workman/union is not entitled for any relief for want of evidence .

5. Accordingly held that the concerned workman/ union is not entitled to get any relief in the case in pursuance of the present reference order for want of evidence and the claim of the workman is liable to be rejected which is hereby rejected .

6. Reference is answered in affirmative in favour ofthe workman and against the workman.

SURESH CHANDRA . Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 839.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ. सी. आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण , गोहावटी के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या 2 ( सी )/2004 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/265/ 2002- आई. आर. ( सी.एम. - 11 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005 S.O. 839. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award | Ref. 2 ( C) /2004 ] of the Industrial Tribunal , Guwahati now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-2005 .

No. L - 22012/ 265 /2002 - IR ( CM - II ) ] N P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI , ASSAM

REFERENCE NO . 2 ( C) OF 2004 PRESENT :

Shri D.C. Choudhury . Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal, Guwahati .

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute between :

The Management of Food Corporation of India . Shillong

Versus

The District Secretary. FCI Executive Staff Union , Silchar .

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2303

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

Date of Award ; 28-12-04

AWARD

The reference arising out of the Govt . Order No. L - 22012/265 /2002- ( IR (CM - II) dt. 08-08-2003 relates to the dispute indicated in the schedule below :

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India , Regional Office , N.E.F. Region , Shillong in transferring entire staff from District Office , Silchar , NEFR to Distt. Office , Aizal and closing down District Office , Silchar is legal andjustified ? If not , to what relief the employees ofDistrict Office , Silchar, NEFR under Regional Office , NEFR, Shillong , FCI are entitled ? " .

On receipt of notice both the parties appeared and filed their written statement before this Tribunal . Management is taken step through their Deputy Manager Mr. R. Chawla . The Union side is absent without step . On perusal of ordersheet it is found that the union side is absent persistently for last 3 dates without any step . It appears to me that the union side is not interested to proceed with this matter . Consequently it appears to me there is no dispute between the parties at this stage . Accordingly no dispute award is hereby passed.

Given under my hand and seal of this tribunal on this 28-12-2004 .

D. C. CHOUDHURY, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 840.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एल सी/आर/12/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं . एल -22012/278/1998- आई. आर. ( सी.एम.- II) ] एन . पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005 S.O. 840.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. CGIT /LC / R/ 12/ 93 of the Cent . Govt. Indus . Tribunal - cum - Labour court . Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of WCL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 09-02-2005 .

[No. L - 22012/ 278/ 1998 - IR ( CM - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

CASE NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 12/ 93

Shri C. M. Singh , Presiding Officer .

The Secretary,

Samyuktha Koyla Mazdoor Sangh , PO Chandametta ,

Distt . Chhindwara (MP)

.....Applicant

Versus

The General Manager ,

Kanhan Area of WCL ,

PO Dungaria,

Distt . Chhindwara (MP) .

....... Non - applicant

AWARD

Passed on this 31st day of January, 2005.

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L - 22012/278 /98 - IR- (C.II) dated 14-1-93 has referred the folowing dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of Kanhan Area of W.C. Ltd. in relation to their Nandan Colliery No. 1 in dismissing the services of Shri Basodi S / o Imrath , General Mazdoor Category I w.e.f. 19-12-1988 is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ? " 2. After the reference order was received and registered in this tribunal , notices were issued to the parties to file their respective statement of claim etc. The workman filed his statement on claim, the management filed written statement and thereafter the workman filed rejoinder . The cases was at the stage of cross - examination of management's witness by the workman . Inspite of repeated notice , the workman remained absent and therefore on 28-1-2005 , the service of notice on the workman held sufficient by this court . Inspite of notice , the workman failed to appear for prosecuting the case .

3. It is very clear from the above circumstances that the workman has lost interest in the case and does not want to prosecute it . Therefore No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 841.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एल सी/आर/262/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/493/1998- आई. आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ] एन . पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी 2304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005 S.O. 841. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. CGIT/LC / R/262/99 of the Cent. Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour court . Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of WCL and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 09-02-2005 .

[No.1-22012/493/ 1998 - IR ( CM - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

CASE NO . CGIT /LC/ R/ 262/ 99

Shri C. M. Singh , Presiding Officer.

The Vice President ,

R.K.K.M.S ( INTUC) , P.O. Chandametta ,

Distt. Chhindwara

.....Applicant

Versus

The General Manager ( IR) ,

W.C.Ltd . , Coal Estate , Civil Lines . Nagpur (M.S.)

....... Non - applicant

AWARD

Passed on this 27th day of January, 2005 .

1. The Government of India . Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L - 22012/ 493/ 98 - IR ( C.M.II) dated 26-28-7-1999 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of WCL , Nagpur in not promoting Shri Sunil Kumar Bhaisya , Pharmacist T & S Grade C of WCL , Kanhan Area (Hirdegarh Siding Dispensary of WCL , Kanhan arca ) to Pharmacist T & S Grade B is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?" 2. The case was at the stage of filing statement of claim . On 2-9-94 the date fixed in the reference , Shri A. K. Shashi , Advocate for the management filed a memorandun of settlement in Form " H " . On 27-1-2005 the date fixed in the reference , the execution of the aforesaid settlement deed was verified by the workman in person and the counsel for the management . Thus the deed of settlement is duly verified before me . The verification has been recorded on the back of Paper No. 7 of record . The terms of settlement are as under :-

"1. It is agreed by the Union and the workman himself viz Shri S.K. Vaishya that case No. R/262 /99 pending before the Hon'ble CGIT will be withdrawn on promotion as the dispute has been resolved amicably.

2. This agreement will not be a precedent in future and has been agreed by the union that such similar case will not be raised in future by quoting this as an example .

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 3. This is full and final settlement in respect of the promotion of the employee concerned . Neither workman concerned himself nor through any Union shall raise any dispute in regard to this settlement at any level statutory or non -statutory, judicial or non -judicial . "

The parties have prayed that the award may be passed in terms of settlement .

3. I have perused the above terms of settlement deed which appears to be just , fair and lawful. I , therefore , record award in terms of settlement arrived at between the parties and made no order as to costs .

4. The copy of the award be sent to the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules .

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2005

P का. आ. 842.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी डी आई टी/एल सी/ आर/ 155/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/175/94- आई. आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005

S.O. 842. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/ R/ 155 / 94 of the Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 09-02-2005 .

[No. L - 22012/ 175 / 94 - IR ( CM - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN Desk Officer ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

CASE NO . CGIT/ LC / R/ 155/94

Shri C. M. Singh . Presiding Officer .

The Organising Secretary. Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh (INTUC). At & P.O. Dungaria . Distt . Chhindwara ( MP) .

Applicant

Versus

The General Manager . Kanhan Area of Western Coalfields Limited , At& PO Dungaria . Distt. Chhindwara ( MP) .

Non-applicant [ भाग II खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2305

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

AWARD

Passed on this 2nd day of February, 2005 .

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L- 22012/ 175/ 94 - IR ( C. II) dated 12-9-04 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of General Manager, Kanhan Area , Western Coalfields Ltd. , Chhindwara is justified in granting designation of accounts clerk to Shri H. P. Gayatra from 3rd November 1989 in Grade II instead of 12-12- 1982 the date from which he was utilised in accounts section . If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

2. The reference order was received and registered in this tribunal on 19-9-94. It was at the stage of evidence ofworkmen/Union on 20-9-04 when the management filed Memorandum of settlement in Form - H arrived at between the parties . This memorandum of settlement was duly verified before me by the learned counsels for the parties .

3. I have perused the above Memorandum of settlement . The terms of settlement appears to be just, fair and lawful . I therefor record my Award in terms of Memorandum of settlement arrived at between the party and pass no order as to costs .

4. The copy of the award be sent to the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour as per rules .

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 843.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस . ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एल सी/ आर/167/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/136/97- आई. आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005 S.O. 843. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/ R/ 167 /98 of the Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of SECL and their workman , received by the Central Government on 09-02-2005.

[No. L - 22012/ 136 / 97 - IR ( CM - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

CASE NO . CGIT /LC/ R/ 167/ 98

Shri C. M. Singh , Presiding Officer .

The General Secretary, Koyla Mazdoor Sabha (UTUC) , Sohagpur Area, PO Dhanpuri ,

Applicant Distt . Shahdol (MP) .

Versus

The General Manager,

Sohagpur Area, SECL , PO Dhanpuri , Distt. Shahdol (MP) .

Non-applicant

AWARD

Passed on this 3rd day of February, 2005 .

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L - 22012/ 136 / 97 - IR ( C.II ) dated 30-7-98 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :--

"Whether the action of the General Manager, SECL , Sohagpur Area in not protecting basic of Shri Mithai Lal . Burhar No. 3 Colliery on his promotion from the post of Munshi is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. After the reference order was received and registered in this tribunal-cum- Labour Court , notices were issued to the parties to file their respective statements of claim. The case was at the stage of filing statement of claim by the workman. In spite of sufficient service of notice on the workman by registered AD post , he failed to appear and prosecute the case . Thereafter the notice was also sent to him under certificate of posting . In spite of it, he did not appear to prosecute the case . It clearly indicates that the workman does not want to prosecute this case .

3. Under the above circumstances , It is quite clear that the workman has no interest in prosecuting the case . Therefore No Dispute Award is passed without any orders as to costs .

4. The copy of the award be sent to the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour as per rules.

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 844.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हरियाणा मिनरल्स लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक 2306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 40/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-29012/99/94- आई . आर. ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम . डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005

Department candidate for this selection and filling up the post of Asstt . accountant in Haryana Minerals Limited and the petitioner applied for the post in question and after facing selection the petitioner was appointed on 12-4-91 to the post ofAsstt . Accountant and the petitioner was put on probation for a period of one year and after completion of 1 year probation period . the management did not extend the period of probation and therefore , the petitioner acquired the status of a confirm employee and therefore is entitled for all the service benefit including the benefit of ID Act , 1947.

S.O. 844. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/95 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Haryana Minerals Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

That the petitioner has been working in the HML since his appointment to the entire satisfaction of all his superior and there has been no complaint of any type against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner acquired the status of confirmed employee and therefore is entitled for all the benefit which are admissible under the Industrial Dispute Act . 1947 .

[No. L -29012/99 / 94 - IR ( M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

That the management vide its order dated 21-12-92 retrenched the petitioner from service without following the procedure and the impugned order dated 21-12-92 is produced here as under : --

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, NEW DLEHI

I. D. No. 40/95

Shri R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer

"Consequent upon reduction of mining operations and productions of the minerals your services have been found surplus in your category. Your services are hereby retrenched with effect from 21-12-92 . Please collect the amount of one month's pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation admissible to you under section 2 - F ( e ) on 21-12-92 from the cash section " .

In the matter of :

Sh . Rajinder Prasad ,

S/ o Mandan Lal , R/ o 2128 , Prem Nagar , West Patel Nagar , New Delhi -08 .

That the impugned order 21-12-92 passed by Chief Mining Engineer is illegal without jurisdiction against the mandatory provisions of the ID Act , 1947 , against the principle ofnatural justice and therefore the same is liable to be quashed and the petitioner is entitled to re- instatement and service alongwith all the service benefits .

Versus

The Managing Director ,

Haryana Minerals Ltd. , 703-704 , Arunachal Building, Barakhamba Road , New Delhi .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 29012 / 9/ 94 - IR ( VIVIDH) Central Government , dt. 03/06-03-1995 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :-

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement, it has been stated that in pursuance to the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India dated 15th May 1992, passed in writ petition ( C ) No. 4677 / 1985 titled as M. C. Mehta etc. Vs. Union of India , all the mechanical stone crushers in Faridabad/Ballabhgarh area had to face closure with effect from 15th August 1992 . Further the Hon'ble Supreme Court directed the immediate stoppage of stone crushers in the union territory ofDelhi/Faridabad - Ballabhgarh complex , which had no valid licences from the appropriate authorities . Besides . the Central Pollution Central Board has also stopped some other stone crushers under section 31 A of Air ( Prevention and Control of Pollution ) Act 1981. As a result almost all the stone crushers of the area have been ceased to operate .

"Whether the action of the managment of M/ s . Haryana Minerals Ltd. in terminating the services of Sh . Rajinder Prasad w.e.f. 21-12-92 is justified ? If not , to what relief he is entitled and from what date " .

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim, it has been stated that the respondent management notified the vacancies to the employinent exchange Narnaul and District Soldiers Board and to the

The stone produced by various mining establishments in Faridabad and Ballabgarh area, is required to be crushed in the stone crushers so as to make it commercially useful as road metal or building stone and make it marketable . Duc to closure of stone crushers who are the users of the stone produced by the mining industry of the area including the various mining establishments operated by Haryana Minerals Ltd. suffered

1 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2307

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

serious bolt. As a result the mining operations and production of minerals of these establishments have suffered a crisis causing a serious set back in these mining establishments .

In the circumstances the management was unable to provide employment to its workmen in the stone quarry in question. It was compelled to take appropriated legal steps for retrenchment of its workmen. In the aforesaid circumstance the management after going through/ coinplying all the provisions of law has taken a decision for retrenchment and passed the order dated 21-12-92 in consonance with the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 .

The services of the workman have been retrenched in compliance of Section 25 (F) Chapter V - A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 after going through all the requirements as contemplated therein. That the order of retrenchment dated 21-12-92 is just , legal and valid as the same have been passed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter V- A of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Section 25 (F) has completely been followed. Pay in lieu of one month's notice and retrenchment compensation has been paid to the workman . Notice has also been given in compliance with Section 25(F) .

The claimant has filed rejoinder . In his rejoinder he has reiterated tha averments of his claim and has denied most of the paras of the WS. The evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the records.

It transpires from perusal of the records that the workman was absenting from 22-04-03 and he was not present despite knowledge. Notice has been sent to him still he did not turn up. It was submitted from the side of the management that due to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. C. Mehta's case , the Units of the respondent in Union Territory of Delhi/ Faridabad & Ballabhgarh Complex were closed. The Central Pollution Board also stopped crushers under Section 31 (A) of AIR (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act , 1981 as such most of the workmen had to be retrenched . This workman was also retrenched in view of the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Central Control Board . Retrenchment compensation has been paid and no junior to the workman applicant has been taken into service as such the provisions of Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 is not attracted . Compensation has been paid and no fresh appointment has been taken as such 25 H of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 is also not applicable. The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The reference is replied thus :-

The action of the management of M/ s . Haryana Minerals Ltd. in terminating the services of the Rajinder Prasad w.e.f. 21-12-92 isjustified. The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The Award is given accordingly. D1.: 01-02-05

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer 565 G1 /05-40

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 845.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय पुरातत्व विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 65/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-42012/ 222/ 2001 - आई. आर. ( सीएम- II) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005 S,O. 845. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) of the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 65/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Kanpur (U. P. ) as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Archaeological Survey of India, and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[ No. L -42012/ 222 / 2001 - IR ( CM- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, SARVODAYA NAGAR , KANPUR, U. P. Industrial Dispute No. 65 of 2002 In the matter of dispute between :

Vyas Muni Dwivedi , S/o Sh . Basant Rai Dwivedi , Niwasi Village and Post Purauna , District Reewan , Reewan , M. P. AND

The Superintendent , Archaeological Survey of India , Ballieguard Cottage Golaganj , Lucknow.

AWARD

1. Central Government. Ministry of Labour, vide notification No. L - 42012 / 222 / 2001 / IR/ CM - II , dated 6-8-02 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal : -

Whether the action of the Suptd . Archaeological Survey of India. Lucknow in terminating the services of Sri Vyas Muni Dwivedi a daily rate worker w.e.f. Dec. 95 and employing junior workman without giving him opportunity of employment is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to ?

2308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 42011 /2/ 92- IR (Misc) Central Government,dt . 28-01-1993 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder : -

2. It is unnecessary to give full facts of the case as on 5-8-04 when the case was taken up for hearing , the auth. representative for the workman instead of adducing evidence of the workman has submitted before the Tribunal that as the workman is not turning up , hence is not inclined to prosecute with the present case . He also made an endorsement to this effect on the statement of claim filed by the workman . Before 5-8-04 , the workman was given repeated opportunities by the tribunal to adduce his evidence . but he palpably failed to adduce any evidence in support of the case .

" Whether the action of the managment of CCI, Charkhi Dadri in not paying the compensation ofwages for the period from 31-8-89 to 17-9-89 to all the workmen of coal handling section whose names are given with the demand notice is fair, just and legal ? If not , to what relief the workmen concerned is entitled to and from what date" .

3. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case discussed above , the tribunal is left with no other option but to hold that the workman is not interested in prosecuting his case and accordingly the workman is not entitled for any relief as claimed by him for want of evidence .

SURESH CHANDRA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2005

The General Secretary on bahalf of the workmen has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that present dispute relates to the following 31 workmen employed in Charkhi Dadri Cement Corporation of India Ltd. in Coal and Raw Material handling department . That Charkhi Dadri Cement unit was earlier managed by its former management of Dalmia Dadri Cement Ltd. who declared illegal closure of this unit on 18-3-80 and rendered its work force jobless except 95.without making payment of any compensation U /s 25F or 25FFF and other legal dues of the workers.

का. आ. 846.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कार्यों ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 15/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती हैं, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-42011/2/92- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम . डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2005

That on the persistant demand of the workman the Govt. of India later on taken over the said unit by promulgating Presidential Ordinance on 23-6-81 which was replaced with Parliament Act namely Dalmia Dadri Cement Ltd. (Transfer of Undertakings and Acquisition) Act , 1981. The Govt . simultaniously handed over its managementto Cement Corporation of India Ltd. , which is a public undertaking . The take over of above closed undertaking was mainly to provide employment to the employees who had rendered jobless .

S.O. 846. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 15/93 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , New Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn . of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[No. L- 42011/ 2 / 92 - IR ( M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DLEHI

Thatproduction capacity of the said unit at the time ofclosure was 750 MT per day . The management of CCI Ltd. after take over. however, decided to run the plant only with the production of 500 MT per day. The work force at the time of closure was 1600 workmcı on muster rolls besides about 120 workers employed on the job of cement loading and unloading of coal and raw inaterial handling . The management of CCI Ltd. however , determine the man power strength as 862 Muster rolls entployees besides 33 workmen on the job of cement loading and 31 workers on the job of coal and raw material handling.

I. D. No. 15/93

PRESENT :

Shri R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer

In the matter of :

The General Secy..

Cement Corporation Karamchari Union ,

Charkhi Dadri .

Versus

That seniority list of coal and raw material handling workers was also drawn as stated in para I about whose services were required every day . That wages and other service conditions of all the workers employed in cement Industry in the country have settled on all India basis . The Govt . of India appointed tripartite wage board for cement Industries who gave its recommendations in 1959 which were accepted by the Govt . and made effective from 1-1-60.

The General Manager ,

Cement Corporation of India ,

Charkhi Dadri .

That it was allowed under the reconmmendations of Ist cement wage board that work on the job of cement

1 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

loading and coal and other raw material handling is allowed to be done through contract system due to un- certaintity prevailing on these jobs on account of untimely supply of Railway Wagons . These recommendations were based upon Hyderabad Committee 1955. It was , however, recommended on the same time that the workmen employed on these jobs through contract system would be entitled to get the same rate of wages . D. A. Bonus , Medical facilities and other benefits which were made applicable for other departmental and regular employees .

That the workers whose names are mentioned at para 1 above are old employees employed in Charkhi Dadri Cement unit since the period of DDCL . These workers are in regular and continuously employment since the factory has been taken over by the CCI management . That the CCI management had been appointing or nominating different persons from time to time calling upon them as ⚫contractors on the job of coal and raw material handling. The actual control , however, always remained in the hands of CCl management itself with regard to each and every matter . The contractor is only a tool in the hands of CCI management having no independent status and control. Neither CCI management nor the contractors appointed by them since the date of take over are having any valid registration certificate and licence under the contract labour ( R and A) Act .

That petitioner workers are legally entitled to get the loss of wages and or legal compensation for the period of forced unemployment from 31-8-89 to 17-9-89. They are further legally entitled to get minimum wages and all other lawful facilities and benefits alongwith past arrears at par with other regular and Deptt . workers .

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been stated that the reference has been made by the appropriate Govt . against the management of M /s . Cement Corporation of India Ltd. , Charkhi Dadri on the presumption that the applicants are the workmen of the coal handling section of the respondent and this reference is contrary to the pleadings of the applicant who in their claim application has made a reference in para 12 of the claim statement that the respondent is appointing/ nominating different persons from timeto time calling them as contractors on the job of coal and raw material handling . Thus , apparently there is a contractor involved in the transaction which is within the knowledge of the applicants . The contractor has not beenimpleaded as a party either in the demand notice or in the refcrence . As such no demand notice is tenable against the respondent management viz - a -viz the dispute of contract labour. Thus the order of reference is bad in law on that score alone .

That there is no relationship of master and servant between the applicants and the respondent . Simply on the presumption of the applicants that the contract vests with the respondet , therefore no demand can be referred by the appropriate government without referring the dispute of relationship between the applicants and the respondent . The court cannot travel beyond the terms of reference and in the absence of any such reference no

2309

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

demand notice/reference is tenable in the present form , hence the court cannot adjudicate upon this matter . Accordingly, the reference order is without jurisdiction.

That the applicants have not come to this Hon'ble Court with clean hands and concealed the facts. It is submitted that proceedings were initiated u/s 33c ( I) by the Regional Labour Commissioner ( C) , Chandigarh in which S/ Sh. Hawa Singh and Ram Gopal filed Writ against the said order in the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab andHaryana at Chandigarh with CWP No. 15091 of 1990 between K. K. Yadav, contractor (the then employer of the applicants ) and the same was disposed of on 16-4-91 covering all the aspects pertaining to issue no . 2. After the matter was disposed of by the Hon'ble High Court no demand notice could be presented nor any reference could be made by the appropriate government onthe principle of resjudicata. Even in respect of the claim ofmedical facilities as contemplated in statement the same is pending for adjudication before the Presiding Officer , Labour Court , Haryana at Hissar. Accordingly the applicants have misleaded the Hon'ble Authority while filing the present demand notice. As such the present demand notice deserved to be dismissed on this score alone .

The respondent cannot affirm the appointment of 31 persons enlisted in the claim statement as the persons employed in coal and raw material handling department . The fact is that the coal and raw material handling job is being assigned to a registered licensed contractor for which licence have been obtained by the respondent as well as the contractor. Since these persons were never employed by the respondent, therefore the respondent management cannot affirm their employment in the coal and raw material handling department.

It is pointed out that the parliament enacted as an act known as Dalmia Dadri Cement Limited Transfer and Undertakings (Act) , 1981 and the unit was taken over by the Central Government and vested with respondent management. The object of the act is specific in nature and is not the same as alleged . The factum of production and employment is matter of record . The respondent is not aware about the working strength on thejob of loading and unloading of coal and raw material handling as alleged by the Dalmia Dadri Cement Limited. No actual assessment has ever been made by the respondent . However, the assessment was made by the team experts forthis particular job too as was done for other jobs and this assessment was made accordingly by the team.

The work of loading and unloading of coal and raw material handling is being assigned to the independent contractor from time to time by the respondent . These independent contractors have their own control and supervision regarding employment , working , wages disbursement etc. These independent contractors have their own licence under the contract labour ( regulations and abolition) Act and the respondent management has also taken the licence as principle employer according to the Ibid Act. The contractors are not in any way tools in the hands of CCI management as alleged.

2310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 / PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Contractor. The work of handling coal and raw materials ofloading and unloading is not a perennial nature of work . The Contractor has not been impleaded. The workmen applicants have filed written arguments . It is admitted that they were doing intermittent work of loading and unloading. They were not performing duties of permanent nature as such it was contract for service and not contract of service . The workmen applicants have no right for regularisation or reinstatement in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court referred to above.

The referene is replied thus : -

The action of the management of CCI , Charkhi Dadri in not paying the compensation of wages for the period from 31-8-89 to 17-9-1989 all the workmen of coal handling section whose names are given with the demand notice is fair, just and legal . The workmen applicants are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The award is given accordingly.

Dt. 01-02-2005

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer Being a principal employer the management is considering the aspect that the wage board Award is being implementedby the contractor in toto and no violation is being affected as alleged . It is incorrect that as per the wage board Award the position of a regular employee stands on the same footing as of the casual or intermittent employee working with the contractor . The workers of the coal and raw material handling engaged by the contractor are not similar to the regular workers of the respondent nor the work of the respondent nor the work of the loading and unloading of coal and raw inaterial handling is regular in nature . As per the information of the respondent the contractors are paying wages to their workers according to the award co - related with the workload as fixed at different points since the work is purely of casual nature , therefore , the workers are entitled to wages through the contractor for the work performed. Thus the system of the contractor cannot be equated with regular employces as this work is admittedly not of regular nature as per the wage Board Award . The facilities are also provided to the contract labour as per the wage board award is our unit by the contractor . Thus the entire contention of lining the contract labour with time rate workers or regular workers is a wrongful concept made out by the applicants .

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

The General Secretary has filed rejoinder on behalf of the workman applicants . He has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim and has denied most of the paras of the WS . The evidence of both the parties . have been taken .

Heard arguments from the side of the management . Nonewas present from the side of the workman applicants . Perused the records .

का. आ. 847.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल इन्लैण्ड कैपचर फिशरीज रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/ एल सी/ आर/ 8 /98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42011/111/96- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005

S.O. 847. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC / R/ 8 / 98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Inland Capture Fisheries Research Institute and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05.

[No. L- 42011/ 111 / 96 - IR ( DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

The case of the workmen is that 31 workmen were employed in Charkhi Dadri Cement Corporation of India Limited in Coal and Raw Material Handling Department . The said Unit was taken by Dalmiya Dadri Cement Limited but subsequently by presidential ordinance on 23-06-1981 it was again taken away from the Dalmiya Dadri Cement Limited and its management was handed over to Cement Corporation of India Limited . The CCI started running the Unit . The workmen demanded regularisation but they were not regularised . They were doing the duty of coal handling and loading and unloading of raw materials . It was from the side of the management that these workmen were taken through the Contractor . There was no direct relationship of master and servant . The matter regarding the workmen was raised before the Labour Commissioner. Shri Hawa Singh and Ram Gopal filed writ against the order of the Labour Commissioner in the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh and the dispute was finally decided . The Writ Petition ofthe workmen Hawa Singh and Ram Gopal was rejected . These workmen are of the same category so they cannot sent demand notice . Their claim is barred by principle of resjudicata .

Case No. CGIT/ LC/ R/ 8 /98

Presiding Officer : Shri C. M Singh .

It was further submitted that it is the version of the workmen that they were engaged in coal handling and loading and unloading raw materials through the [ भाग II-खंड 3( ii ) ]

2311

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

Shri Ram Taru ,

At& Vill . Sanghavi ,

PO Bharghar, Pune - 411042

Applicant

Versus

The Director,

Central Inland Capture , Fisheries Research Institute , Barrackpore- 743101

Non-applicant

AWARD

Passed on this 4th day of February, 2005 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L -42011 / 111 / 96 - IR (DU) dated 1-1-98 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Director, Central Inland Capture Fisheries Research Institute Barrackpore ( W. B. ) in terminating the services of Shri Ram Taru w.e.f. 19-11-94 is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled for ?" 2. After the reference order was received and registered , notices were issued to the parties to file their respective statements of claim. The case was at the stage of filing statement of claim by the workman . In spite of sufficient service of notice , the workman failed to appear and file his statement of claim.

3. It appears that the workman has no interest in prosecuting the case . Under the circumstances . No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .

4. The copy of the award to sent to the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour as per rules .

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 848.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डायरेक्टर पोस्टल ( एकाउन्टस्) के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नं.- II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 178/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/54/99- आई. आर. (डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005 S.O. 848. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 178/ 99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Director Postal ( Accounts ) and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 9-2-2005 .

[No. L - 40012/ 54/ 99 - IR (DU ) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR , RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DLEНІ

I. D. No. 178/99

PRESENT :

Shri R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer

In the matter of :

Sh . Bishan Dutt, S/ o Sh . Shankar Dutt, 22-Khurshi Square , P & T Qtr. , CivilLines, Old Sectt . , Delhi-54.

Versus

The Director of Accounts ( Postal ) , Old Secretariat, Delhi-54.

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 40012/ 54/99 - IR (DU) Central Government ,dt. 30-7-1999 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the managment of Director Postal (Accounts) in terminating the services of Sh . Bishan Dutt , casual labour, is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

That the claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman/ applicant was engaged as casual labourer on and from 1-1-88 in the office of the Director of Accounts (Postal) Old Sectt. Delhi under Delhi Postal Circle. He was allowed to work uptill 12-11-90 . When the workman reported for duty on 13-11-90 and onwards he was refused work and his service was terminated with verbal orders , while juniors were retained in service as casual labourers and some of them have even been appointed on regular basis . S/Shri Ombir Singh, Mohinder Kumar, Ashok Kumar and Lalit Prasad were subsequently retained in service ignoring the claim of the applicant in contravention of Section 25 -H of the I. D. Act , 1947. S/ Shri Pyare Lal and Raj Kumar who were junior to the applicant have been appointed on regular basis ignoring the claim of the applicant in violation of the rules on the subject . The management i.e. o/ o Director of Accounts (Postal) Delhi has been giving wrongful and illegal breaks in the service of the workman/ applicant with the sole intention of 2312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

denying him the benefit of regular and permanent workman status whereas the work assigned to him was of permanent and perennial nature.

The management on 10-12-90 requested the Zonal Employment Office Subzi Mandi , Delhi for some casual labourers and instead of retaining / reemploying the applicant the names of fresh candidates were approved for employment . There was no need of dispensing with the services of applicant w.e.f. 13-11-90 when the management was in need of casual labourers in the month ofDecember , 1990. The action of the management falls within the Fifth Schedule ( unfair labour practices ) of the I. D. Act , 1947 .

That a similarly circumstances I. D. Case No. 25/ 92 between some workers and the above mentioned management has been decided in favour of the workman by this Hon'ble Court . The copy ofjudgement is enclosed.

The management has filed written statement. In the Written Statement , it has been stated that the present application is liable to dismissed as the petitioner has narrated a complete false story and has not come to the Hon'ble Tribunal with clean hands . That the present application is liable to be dismissed as the petitioner has no locus standi to file the present application .

The entire facts of petitioner is denied specifically until and unless specifically admitted and the present application merits dismissal in lemini itself as it is a clear misuse of process of law. That the contention of petitioner with regard to " his services being terminated while his juniors were retained in service and some of them even have been appointed on regular basis ignoring the claim of workman " is factually false and wrong and as such application is liable to be dismissed.

That the contention of workman that management has been giving wrongful and illegal breaks in the service of the workman / applicant with the sole intention of denying him the benefit of regular and permanent workman status is totally false and frivolous and as such the application merits outright dismissal . That the contention of workman that work assigned to him was of perennial nature is false and denied and as such the application merits outright dismissal .

That the contention of workman that there was no need of dispensing with the service of the applicant w.e.f. 13-11-90 is totally false and as such denied and so the application merits outright dismissal . No one was appointed on the date of termination for the same job . That the contention of the workman that the case falls under fifth schedule (unfair labour practices) of I. D. Act , 1947 is false and denied . It is further denied that workman was not alternatively employed despite his best efforts . As such application merits outright dismissal .

It is specifically denied that 1. D. Case No. 25/92 is applicable in present case as such application is liable to be dinissed. That the claim of workman is totally illegal and not maintainable as the same is based on false and concocted story and such application merits outright

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] dismissal . That the respondent is not an industry as such the application is liable to be dismissed.

That this Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction to try the present application.

That the D. A. (P) Delhi has been engaging casual labourers from time to time for intermittent nature of work in summer and winter season like filling of water in the coolers during summer seasons and distruction of out dated records cutting of time barred IPOs etc. such as manual labour work in the office in winter season .

That the applicant . Sh . Bishan Dutt was engaged as casual labourer for doing the intermittent nature of work for the specifically period as detail given under :-

Year

Period

Month

Actualworking days

1988

16days

8-1-88 to 29-2-88

Jan. 88 Feb. 88

21 days 37 days 1989

1-5-89 to

May89

18days

31-7-89

June 89

22days

and

July 89

28 days

6-9-89 to

18 days

Sept. 89

Oct. 89

31-10-89

21 days 97 days

24-5-90

1990

May90

8days

June 90

21 days

31-7-90

July90

23 days

and

24-8-90

Aug. 90

5days

20 days

Sept. 90

Oct. 90

23 days

12-11-90

Nov. 90

6 days 106 days It is very much clear from the details given above that the applicant was not engaged continuously as casual labourer. He was engaged for a different nature ofjob . He had never worked and completed 206 days in a calendar year of his engagement as casual labourer which is mandatory for consideration of giving temporary status and subsequent regularisation. As and when the services of the applicant were not required by the department he was informed for his discontinuation of job as a casual labourer . The applicant has not enforceable legal right to claim for his continuous deployment casual labourer as to claim of his seniority for engagement as casual labourer against any body else whether he was engaged prior to him or after his termination through employment exchange .

That S / Shri Pyare Lal and Raj Kumar worked continuously for more than two years and completed 206 days attendance in each year as per guidelines of DOP & T, Govt . of India for regularisation and they were subsequently regularised . That there was no violation of Fifth Schedule since the Industrial Disputes Act is not applicable to the respondents .

That the applicant worked only in different short spell as daily rated mazdoor and that too for specific nature ofwork on each occasion and his services were dispensed

1 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

with on conclusion of the work for which he was engaged . Itisfurther submitted that the applicant never worked for 206 days in a calendar year of his engagement as casual labourer. Therefore , question of offending any law does not arise when action was taken against him under the relevant rules which enable the authorities concernedto dis-engage him without assigning any reason. It is further submitted that the work was of intermittent nature for which the applicant engaged and subsequently dis- engaged on completion ofwork .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of written statement . The management has also denied most of the aras of statement of claim. Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on record.

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he was initially engaged from 1-1-88 in the office of the respondent and he worked up to 12-11-90. He was refused work on.13-11-90 . Shri Omvir Singh , Shri Mohinder Kumar, Shri Ashok Kumar and Shri Lalit Kumar were retained in service ignoring the claim of the applicant in contravention Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Shri Pyare Lal , Raj Kumar junior to the applicant have been appointed on regular basis . He has been given wrongful break in service .

It was further submitted that in Industrial Dispute Case No. 25/92 the Presiding Officer has directed regularisation of Shri Prem Ballabh and Shri Rameshwar .

It was submitted from the side of the management that from time to time Seasonal Casual Labours are engaged . Shri Vishan Dutt worked for 37 days in 1988 , in 1989 he worked for 97 days and in 1990 he worked for 106 days . He has never worked for 206 days of his engagement in a Calendar year. Shri Pyare Lal and Shri Raj Kumar worked continuously for more than two years and completed 206 days in each year so they were regularised. This fact is not borne out from the true copy of the attendance register submitted by the management . The workman applicant as per the attested copy of attendance register was engaged for a greater period than that of Raj Kumar.

It was submitted from the side of the workman that Shri Prem Ballabh and Shri Rameshwar filed I. D. No. 25/92. they have been regularised in the Pay Scales of Pyare Lal and Shri Raj Kumar. This workman also worked with them for the entire period as per the attendance register as such this workman has worked for the period for which Shri Prem Ballabh and Shri Rameshwar have worked so the discrimination cannot be made with the present workman .

It is of course true that the workman applicant has filed this ID case in 1999 where as the other two filed case in 1992. The Hon'ble Apex Court has held that delay and laches deprive a man of his right and remedy but in

2313

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

ID Act case Article 137 of the Limitation Act is not applicable as such delay and laches cannot deprive the workman of his remedy and right. It is of course true that delay and laches defeat equity. He has come to the Court after a long gap of time. 2001 ( 1 ) 1st SLR is applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case . The workman applicant is entitled to get benefits of Section 25G of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 even he has not completed 206 days service. The workman is a manual labourer. He has not filed case for nine years . It appears that he was engaged somewhere that is why he did not take care regarding filing of the case but he cannot be deprived of the right which has accrued to him .

In the facts and circumstances of the case the workman applicant is entitled to be regularised within one month after publication of the Award without any back wages and without continuity of service .

The reference is replied thus :

The action of management of Director Postal (A/ c. ) in terminating the services of Shri Vishnu Dutt , Casual Labour is neither legal nor justified. The workman applicant deserves to be regularised within one month from the publication of the Award without any back wages and without continuity of service . In case of default he will get an interest of 12% per annum .

The Award is given accordingly.

Date : 07-02-2005

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 849.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्केलॉजिकल सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नं.- II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 18/ 2000) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-2005 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42011 /81/99- आई. आर. (डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 9th February, 2005 S.O. 849. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 18/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Archaeological Survey of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on (09-02-2005 ,

[No. L - 42011/ 81 / 99 - IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer 2314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] ANNEXURE

of the CPWD and the management have changed me designation from mali to garden attendant but the duty of the garden attendant was/ is remain the same as they were performing the duties under the administrative control of CPWD.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR , RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DLEHI

I. D. No. 18/2000

PRESENT :

Shri R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer

That proper pay scales were not given by the Central Government of the CPWD workers and an agreement was reached between the management of CPWD and its workmen through CPWD Mazdoor Union for re- categorisation/reclassification of the work charged and regular classified staff of CPWD as the same duties and responsibilities were performed by them .

In the matter of :

General Secretary, Akhil Bhartiya Puratatav Sarvekshan Kamgar Union, E-26 . Raja Bazar (Old Qtrs ) , Baba Kharak Singh Marg, New Delhi .

That the Arbitrators had reclassified and recategorised the work of mali being an unskilled workmen to the semi skilled and similarly third pay commission had wrongly classified the status of mali working in the establishment of ASI in the nomenclature of garden attendant have to be changed at par with the mali of CPWD .

Versus

The Director General , Archaeological Survey of India , Janpath , New Delhi .

AWARD

That the workmen of ASI in the category of garden attendant performing duties of mali are performing more ardous duties as their counter parts in the CPWD are performing . That both the categories of workmen as Industrial workmen of the Central Government and both were given pay scale as per recommendations of Central paycommissions for Central Government employees from time to time.

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 42011/ 81/ 99 - IR ( DU) Central Government ,dt . 27-1-2000 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :-

That after the implementation of said Arbitration Award the pay scale of mali were revised w.e.f. 1-1-73 on notional basis and the arrears of wages were also paid w.e.f.1-4-81 in the pay scale of Rs . 210-290 subsequently Revised to Rs . 800-1150 w.e.f. 1-1-86 and after the acceptance of recommendations of fifth pay commission in the pay scale of Rs . 2650-4000.

"Whether the action of the management of Archaeological Survey of India , New Delhi in not giving the pay scales of mali of CPWD to garden attendants working in ASI w.e.f. 1-1-73 in the scale of pay of Rs . 210-290 and from 1-1-86 in the scale of pay of Rs . 810-1150 and from 1-1-96 in the scale of pay of Rs . 2650-4000 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled .

That the workmen in the category of garden attendant performing duties of mali in the establishment ofASI were discriminated in the payment of wages in the pay scale of Rs . 210-290 w.c.f. 1-1-73 Rs . 800-1150 w.e.f. 1-1-86 and also denied the new pay scale of fifth pay commission of Rs . 2650-4000 .

That as per Industry cum region workmen of ASI are also entitled to the wages in the pay scale of Rs . 210-290 w.e.f. 1-1-73 and the arrears in the said pay scale w.e.f. 1-4-81 . That the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgement in the matter of Randhir Singh I's . Union of India have recognised the same pay scale in the same category working in different departments of the Government so the workmen of ASI are also entitled to the same pay scale as their counter parts have been getting in the CPWD and both the departments are functioning directly under the control of Central Government .

The General Secretary hs filed statement of claim on behalf of the workmen. In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) is performing the duties of maintenance ofbuildings . lawns , monuments , gardens , museum etc. That the garden attendants are performing duties of Malis in the establishment of ASI and they are getting wages in the old pay scale of Rs . 196-232 and after the revision of pay w.c.f. 1-1-86 in the pay scale of Rs . 750-940 and similarly the mali of CPWD ( unskilled ) were also getting pay scale of third pay commission in the grade of Rs . 196-232 w.e.f. 1-1-73 and subsequently revised after implementation of 4th pay commission in the pay scale of Rs . 750-940.

That the work of garden horticulture Deptt. of ASI was initially with the management of CPWD and thereafter the work of garden operation was directly came under the above management and the scrvice condition of the old mali was recruited under the recruitment rule

That as per the recent judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of MCD I's . Ganesh Razák and others held that the workinen can demand equal pay for equal work and the dispute can be adjudicated upon under section 10 ( 1 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 .

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

That the malis under the above management are performing duties of digging of ground, trenching, preparation ofbeds , trimming , pruning of plants and also handle moving machines , hedge cutting and doing all kinds of gardening work and also knowing cultivation of common plants and seeds and knowing the methods of garden operations , manuring and erasing etc. and they were getting the pay scale of third pay commission in the pay scale of Rs . 196-232 revised w.e.f. 1-1-86 in the pay scale of Rs . 750-940 as per the recommendations of fourth pay commission .

That the department of CPWD as well as ASI both are under the control of Central Government so the workmen cannot be discriminated by the management after the implementation of the Arbitration Award on 20-12-93 referred to as Annexure -A hereinabove .

That the mali of ASI and mali of CPWD have been getting the pay scales of recommended by the Central Govt . Pay Commissions for Central Govt . Employees from time to time and after the acceptance of the Arbitration Award by the Central Govt. in CPWD denial of same facilities by the managementnent of ASI is violative of principles of equal pay for equal work in the same employment i.e. the Central Govt .

That mali of CPWD /PWD and garden attendants of ASI are doing the work of mali in the same locality but the garden attendants of ASI are not getting skilled pay scales benefits and status after the implementation of arbitration Award dated 20-12-93 with retrospective date .

That the mode of employment ago of employment retirement and duty hours are saine and similar in case of mali of CPWD /PWD and garden attendant of ASI so the workmen of ASI cannot be discriminated and two sets of employees in CPWD and in ASI doing the work of mali in the designation of garden attendant are similarly situated so there cannot be any disparity in respect of pay scales etc.

Thatthe garden attendant of ASI are legally entitled to the same facility working in the same employment i.e. the Central Government on the analog of equal pay for equal work. That the workmen in the category of garden attendant performing the duties of mali are entitled to get pay scale of Rs . 210-290 w.e.f. 1-1-81 in the pay scale of Rs . 800-1150 w.e.f. 1-1-86 and after the implementation of recommendations of 5th pay commission in pay scale ofRs . 2650-4000 at par with their counter parts working in CPWD/PWD .

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been stated that the garden attendants are submitted the work of maintenance of the gardens in and around National Protected Monuments and Nurserys involving weedings , digging , hoeing , lawn moving , watering and other related works of gardens . The garden attendants are working in the pay scale of Rs . 2550- 3200 as per recommendation of 5th Central Pay Commission.

565 G1 /05-41

2315

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

Itis clear that in CPWD the recruitment to the post of mali is made from unskilled of work charge staff recruited initially. Whereas in ASI the garden attendants are recruited directly as per normal rules and it is 1st entry point . Hence the service condition in the CPWD and ASI can not be compared.

That in reply to para 5 of statement of claim it is submitted that the agreement or the award between the management of CPWD and its workmen was for the re- categorisation and re - classification of the requirement of qualified staff of CPWD hence it is not applicable in ASI .

That in reply to para 6 of statement of claim it is submitted that the garden attendant is a entry point and directly recruited from the employment exchange and by inviting application through wide publicity as per rules . Hence unskilled workman of the semi - skilled workmen is not application in the ASI .

It is submitted that the duties of the garden attendants are indicated in para 3 above are normal works for the maintenance and development of the gardens . Hence the work can not be called as more arduous than duties of mali in CPWD . That in the ASI the garden attendants are inducted in the pay scale of Rs . 2550-3200 and subsequently promoted as Jr. Foreman in the pay scale of Rs . 2650-4000 as per rules . Hence the question of upgradation of entry scale does not arise.

It is submitted that the department of CPWD has been categorized as Industry but the ASI does not come under the purview of Industry depending on nature of works through the both are Central Govt . Departments . It is submitted that the minimum qualification required for mali in CPWD is 8th passed with aptitude test for garden works whereas in ASI there is no minimum qualification except desirable for the post of gardeń attendant . Hence the both posts can not be compared .

Itissubmitted that in the light of the facts given in the above paras , the garden attendants of the ASI are legally not entitled for any re- categorisation and re- classification on the basis of arbitration . It is submitted that as per recommendation of Vth Central Pay Commission vide paragraph 612 ( 55-128 ) on page 755 (copy attached for ready reference as annexure M- 7 ) it has been mentioned that the entry scale of Rs . 750-940 pre- revised will be provided to the staff re -designated as mali . As future recruitment to posts at the lowest level should also be made only in this scale i.e. 750-940 mali helper will be promoted to the post of mali in the pay scale of Rs . 800-1150 . In view of the recommendation of Vth Central Pay Commission there is no anomalies accrued as the pay scale of Rs. 750-940 to the garden attendant and Rs . 800-1150 ( Rs . 775-1025 ) has been merged to Rs . 800-1150 to the Jr. Foreman . Hence there is no difference in the pay scales of horticulture staff in Archaeological Survey of India and staff working in CPWD .

The union has filed rejoinder . In his rejoinder he has denied most of the paras of the written statement and has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim .

2316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14. 1926

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] The management has denied most of the paras of the statement of claim .

Heard arguments from both the sides .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

01-01-1973 in view of this fact also the workmen are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for . The case has been filed after long 17 years . Delay and latches defeat equity. The workmen are not performing the same duty as the Mallies of CPWD so the workmen of the present case are not entitled to get pay scales equivalent to the pay scales of the Mallies of CPWD.

The referene is replied thus :-

It was submitted from the side of the union that the work of the Garden Attendant of Horticulture Department of ASI was initially with the management of CPWD and thercafter it came under the above managerment and the service conditions remained the same . The management has changed the designation from Mali to Garden Attendant but the same duties are performed and the Garden Attendants of the management are entitled to get the pay at par with the Mallics of the CPWD.

The action of the management of ASI , New Delhi is not giving the pay scales of Malli of CPWD to Garden Attendants working in ASI w.e.f. 01-01-1973 in the pay scale of Rs. 210-290 and from 01-01-1986 in the pay scale of Rs . 810-1150 and from 01-01-1996 in the pay scale of Rs . 2650-4000 is legal and justified. The workmen applicants are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The Award is given accordingly. Date : 08-02-2005 .

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer It was further submitted that CPWD Mazdoor Union and CPWD entered into compromise and according to that compromise the Mallies of the CPWD are getting higher salary than the attendants of Garden of the management . In the compromise entered into by the Union and the CPWD the post of Malli was re - classified and re- categorized . The Garden Attendants of the the management are entitled to get Equal Pay for Equal Work since 01-01-1973 .

नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 850.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंटरनेशनल एयरपोर्ट अथॉरिटी ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नं.- II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 14/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -11012/9/94- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th February, 2005 It was submitted from the side of the management that there was arbitration award in 1988 between CPWD and its Union and Mallies were re -classified but there is no such arbitration award with the Garden Attendants and the management so compromise entered into between the CPWD and its Union cannot be enforced in case of the Garden Attendants of the management . The 3rd Pay Commissiondesignated the Mallies as Garden Attendants . In CPWD there is defined qualification . The Mallies should be 7th pass whereas in ASI there is no qualification. The 5th Central Pay Commission has given report regarding the pay scales of Garden Attendants and the same has been adopted by the management. The CPWD's Mallies are skilled but the Garden Attendants are semi- skilled. They are getting the pay scale on the basis of Central Pay Commission report .

S.O. 850. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 14/95) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court . New Delhi - ll as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of International Airports Authority of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

It was further submitted that 1982 ( 42 ) FLR 299 MCD Vs. Ganesh Razak case of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is not applicable in the case of the Garden Attendants as they are discharging different duty from the Maliies of CPWD . The Mallies of CPWD are skilled workers whereas the Garden Attendants are semi - skilled so the principle of Equal Pay for Equal work is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case .

[No. L - 11012/9 / 94 - IR (M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR , RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

I. D. No. 14/95 Sh. R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer.

It was submitted from the side of the management that ASI is not an industry and my attention was drawn to ( 1997 ) 4 SCC 257 , this case is not applicable as is in respect of physical research laboratory. Horticulture Department has been declared as an industry by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bangalore Water Supply ASI is an industry as it is carrying on systematic activities . The law cited by the management and the workmen are not applicable in the facts and circumstanes of the case . The matter is delayed. Pay Scale is demanded from [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2317

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

In the matter of :

Shri A. S. Yadav

Versus

1. Α . Α . Ι.

CORRIGENDUM

In accordance with the Rule 28 of Industrial (Central ) Rules , 1957. the following typographical mistakes and omission arc rectified in the last para of page No. 4 of the Award .

1. The number 11 is replaced by 12 in the 2nd line.

2. The name of Shri Sudarshan Choudhary is inserted after Khali Ram in the 4th line.

3. The number 11 is replaced by 12 in the 5th line .

Similarly, the following typographical errors at page 10 of the Award are also rectified .

4. The number 11 is replaced by 12 in the 1st line of the 2nd para .

5. The number 11 is replaced by 12 in the 5th line ofthe concluding para .

R. N. RAI . Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 851.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान कॉपर लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 82/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ सं. एल -43012/ 15/99- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th February, 2005 S.O. 851. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 82/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court . Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Copper Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 08-02-2005 .

[No. L - 43012/ 15/ 99 - IR ( Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT/ LC/ R/ 82/2000

Shri C.M. Singh . Presiding Officer

.....Applica CopperMines Workers Union , The General Secretary. PO Malajkhand. Balaghat.

Versus

Non - applicant The Executive Director , Malajkhand Copper Project of Hindustan Copper Ltd .. PO Malajkhand. Balaghat.

AWARD

Passed on this 28th day of January , 2005 1. The Government of India . Ministry of Labour vide its notification No. L - 43012/ 15 /99 / IR ( M ) dated 24-5-2005 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Malajkhand Project of Hindustan Copper Ltd .. Malajkhand in reverting Shri Chamarsingh S /o Jethoo Singh Pandre . Heavy Vehicle Driver from T.7 scale to Helper T.3 scale ( without protecting his scale) is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. After the reference order was received and registered in this tribunal, notices were issued to the parties to file their respective statements of claim. The case was at the stage of filing the written statement by the management . On 18-1-2005 -the date fixed in the case. an application on behalf of the management was filed on record whereby it has been submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and ultimately after settlement . the Union has agreed not to pursue the present reference and has also written a letter dated 10-9-93 10 this effect . the original of which is enclosed herewith as Annexure - A. Shri S.K. Rao , the learned counsel for the applicant verified the execution of letter marked Annexure "A" of record and Shri R.K. Gupta . Advocate for the management verified the execution of the above letter and submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties . He also identified the signature of Shri R.K. Chandra . the General Secretary of the Union .

3. It is quite clear from the above that the workman does not want to prosecute this case. Under the circumstances . No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .

4. The copy of the award be sent to the Government of India. Ministry of Labour as per rules .

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer 2318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 852.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान कॉपर लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, धनबाद नं. 1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 41/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-43012/14/94- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] वी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th February, 2005 S.O. 852. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 41/95 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court . Dhanbad No. I as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Copper Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-2005

No. L - 43012 / 14/ 94 - IR ( Misc. ) ] B. M. DAVID . Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I , DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference U / s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of 1.D. Act .

1947

Reference No. 41 of 1995

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of M Hindustan Copper Ltd./Indian Copper Complex . Mosaboni Mines .

Versus

Their Workmen

PRESENT :

Shri S. Prasad . Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

For the Employers : Shri D.K. Verma , Advocate .

For the Workman : None .

State Jharkhand .

Industry Copper

Dated. the 25th January, 2005

AWARD

By Order No. L - 43012/ 14/ 94-1.R. ( Misc. ) dated 28-4-1995/2-5-1995 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clanse ( d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947. referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal

"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Hindustan Copper Ltd./Indian Copper Complex.

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Mosaboni Mines , in not regularising the service of Shri Gunadhar Karak as Data Entry Operator and denying consequenial benefits is justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. In this case a petition has been filed on behalf of the concerned workınan , Sri Gunadhar Karak , stating therein that after his separationfrom Company's service there remains no dispute with the company and as such he is not willing to contest the present reference case.

3. In view of the above , since there exists no dispute between the parties , I render a No Dispute ' Award in the present industrial dispute .

S. PRASAD , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 853.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 कां 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. पैसिफिक मिनरल्सप्रा . लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 130/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-27012/2/ 95- आई . आर. ( विविध ) ] वी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th February , 2005

S.O. 853. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref.. No. 130/95) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court . Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Pacific Minerals (P ) Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 08-02-05 .

[No. L - 27012/ 2/ 95 - IR (Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT/ LC/ R/ 130/95

Shri C.M. Singh , Presiding Officer

Dr. R.C. Chandravanshi .

Lalbara Road , Warasconi ,

.Applicant Distt . Balaghat (MP) .

Versus

TheAgent.

M/s Pacific Minerals P. Ltd ..

Nevta Mines , Post Balaghat ,

Distt . Balaghat ( MP) ....... Non - applicant [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2319

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

AWARD

Passed on this 27th day of January, 2005 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L- 27012 / 2 / 95 - IR ( Misc. ) dated 12th July 1995 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s Pacific Minerals Pvt . Ltd. in terminating the services ofDr. R.C. Chandrawanshi was justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. After the reference order was received and registered in this tribunal , notices were issued to the parties to file their respective statements of claim . The reference proceeded further and at the stage of filing rejoinder and documents , management filed settlement deed on 8-12-2004 . The deed appears to be executed by the applicant and the management . On 8-12-2004 , the date fixed in the case , Shri Vedanand Roy, Attorney for the management under - took to call workman before the court on 18-1-2005 for vertification of the deed . On 18-1-2005 the date fixed in the case , when the case was called out , no one responded for the parties and therefore 27-1-2005 was fixed either for verification of the settlement on record or for filing rejoinder and documents by the workman . It was further ordered on that date if the workman does not turn up on the date fixed . it shall be deemed that he does not want to prosecute the case . Again on 27-1-2005 the date fixed in the case, wlien the case was called out , no one responded for the parties and therefore it is deemed that the workman does not want to prosecute the case .

3. It is quite apparant from the above that the workman has no interest in prosecuting the case . Under the circumstances , No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .

4. Copy of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules .

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी , 2005

का..आ. 854.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान कॉपर लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, धनबाद नं. 1 के पंचाट ( शिकायत संख्या 8/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-43025/1/2005- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी. एम . डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th February, 2005 S.O. 854. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Complaint No. 8/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Dhanbad No. 1 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Copper Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 09-02-05 .

[No. L - 43025 /1 /2005 - IR ( Misc .) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference Under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .

(Complaint Under Section 33A of the I.D. Act , 1947 ) . Complaint No. 8 of 2000 .

(Arising out of Reference No. 41 of 1995) PARTIES :

Sri Gunadhar Karak , B. No. 9472 , Qr. No. C/6-4 , Mosaboni No. 3 , At& P.O. Mosaboni Mines , Dist . Singhbhum East.

Complainant.

Vs.

General Manager of M/ s . Hindustan, CopperLtd./Indian Copper Complex, At & P.O. Moubhandar ,

Dt. Singhbhum.

Opp Party/ Management .

PRESENT :

Shri S. Prasad, Presiding Officer

APPEARENCES :

For the Complainant : None.

: Shri D.K. Verma , Advocate .

For the Opp . Party

State : Jharkhand .

Industry : Copper .

Dated, the 25th January, 2005 .

AWARD

In this complaint case the complainant has filed a petition stating therein that after his separation from Company's services there remains no dispute with the Company and as such he is not willing to continue the aforesaid case .

2. Since there exists no dispute between the parties I pass a 'No Dispute ' Award in this Complaint Case .

S. PRASAD , Presiding Officer 2320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 855.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हरियाणा मिनरल लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 57/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-02-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-29012/1/96- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] and legal ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th February, 2005 S.O. 855. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 57/96 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , N. Delhi - II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Haryana Minerals Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-02-05 .

[No. L - 29012/ 1 / 96 - IR ( Misc . ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI Shri R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 57/96

In the Matter of :

Sh . Ghanshyam S/ o Sh. Yashwant Singh , Vill . Banihari , PO . Thanwas ,

Distt. Mohinder Garh (Haryana) .

Versus

The Managing Director,

Haryana Minerals Ltd. , Arunanchal Building , 19 , Barakhamba Road , 703-704,

7th Floor , New Delhi - 110001 .

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 29012/1/ 96-1R (DU ) Central Government Dt . 30-05-1996 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :

"Whether the action of the Management of Haryana Minerals Ltd. , Faridabad in dismissing the services without giving any opportunity to workman Shri Ghan Shyam, Bills - Clerk w.e.f. 09-03-1994 is just The workman has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman was appointed as a Bill Clerk and had been working as such from 20-3-1988 . The services of the workman was regularised in the post of Bill Clerk vide order dt . 19/ 21- 07-1991 and posted with Headquarter. Faridabad . The workman in furtherance of aforesaid order joined duty on 23-07-1990 and submitted his joining report . Since the initial appointment till the date of dismissal of services w.e.f. 09-03-1994 the workman has been discharging his duties to the satisfaction of all and with utmost sincerity and integrity. The pay scale of the workman was Rs . 950- 990-1500 and was getting a salary of Rs . 2071.75 at the time of dismissal. Throughout the service period , the workman maintained unblemished record .

1 That as a Bill Clerk , the duty of the workman was to receive cash and to issue cash memo receipt . It was the duty of the Security Guard to issue gate pass/token to the vehicle entering the mines . The token is handed over to the Billing Clerk, who receives cash and issues receipt for the same. On 29-05-1993 and 30-05-1993 the duty timings of the workman were 10.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. As per duty rules , the Security Guard on duty was to collect the documents from the Billing Clerk i.e. from the workman. No Security Guard or any other person reported for duty and for collecting the documents from the workman . The workman left his place of work and again on 30-05-1993 the workman visited check post at about 8.00 a.m. with his records/documents for handing over the same either to the Security Guard or to the Billing Clerk , but none was on duty . The workman met two labourers at that point and enquired from them , who told the workman that there were 4 truks inside the mines . Though the duty timings of the workman was 10.00 a.m. and since none was at the check post , the workman issued 4 tokens to the labourers . Thereafter , the Managing Director, who was also the Disciplinary Authority reached the place at about 8.30 a.m. and took away the record from the workman. The workman had explained the entire thing to the Managing Director , who did not bother to check with the labourers who were present and to whom the workman had issued tokens for the 4 vehicles .

That the workınan was placed under suspension vide order dt . 31-05-1993by the Corporate Marketing Manager , Shri Anil Chawla . The Corporate Marketing Manager was not the Disciplinary Authority to place the workman under suspension . Thereafter the workman was issued charge sheet dt . 04-10-1993 by the Managing Director , Shri Chander Singh and by the same charge sheet , he was also placed under suspension w.e.f. 31-05- 1993. By the charge sheet dt. 04-10-1993 , the workman was placed under suspension with retrospective effect , which is illegal and unsustainable in law. It is very strange that the workman was placed under suspension by the Corporate Manager and again by the Managing Director with retrospective effect , which itself indicate malafide and predetermination .

[ भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]

Vide charge sheetdt. 04-10-1993, the workman was charged for committing fraud on 30-05-1993 by allowing the vehicles to pass through check post without cash memo and gate passes , when he was posted at Bar Gujjar . The charges are vague and indefinite and indicative of pre- determination of guilt . The words " found committing fraud" itself indicates the pre - determination of guilt without any enquiry and malafide attitude of the Managing Director. The very language of the charge sheet reflect the pre -determined mind of the Manageing Director to finish off the workman . The charge sheet was replied by the workman vide his letter dt . 11-10-1993 .

That one Shri Anil Chawala , Corporate marketing manager was appointed as Enquiry Officer , who placed the workman under suspension vide his letterdt . 31-05- 1993. One Shri S.N. Kaushik was appointed as Presenting Officer. The enquiry conducted against the workman in pursuance to the charge sheetdt . 04-10-1993 was a fake and sham one . No procedure was followed . The Enquiry Officer and the Presenting Officer acted on their own whims and fancies and recorded the proceedings in the way they wanted it.

That the workman was never informed nor furnished any rules and regulations at any point of time which regulates the service conditions including disciplinary action . The charge sheet also does not disclosed under what rule charge sheet was issued and how the allegations would constitute misconduct and what was the misconduct. Even the enquiry proceedings and ultimate order of dismissal from service do not disclose the rules and regulations under which the action was taken against the workman . As aforesaid , the Corporate Manager was not the competent authority to place the workman under suspension . The retrospective suspension vide charge sheet dt. 04-10-1993 by the managing Director is again illegal and unsustainable in law.

That no enquiry report was furnished to the workman though the show cause noticedt . 15-01-1994 indicates that the report was attached with it . In fact, no such enquiry report was received by the workman along with the show cause notice. It is submitted that non - supply ofenquiry report to the workman before passing the order of dismissal itself vitiates the entire action as it deprives the workman of due opportunity and being in gross violation of principles of natural justice . That the show cause notice 15-01-1994 and order of dismissal dt. 09-03-1994 are non speaking orders and no reasoning has been advanced. It is not clear how the charges were established and what were the evidence for proving the charges.

That the management imposed two punishments on the workman . The workman was fined of Rs . 2000 and also dismissed from service . The salary for the month of May, 1993 was never paid to the workman . The imposition of double punishment gravely prejudices the workman and is also illegal and invalid.

That the workman was not even asked whether he would be represented by a co - employee or not and

2321

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

whatever recorded in the proceedings were recorded according towhims and fancies of the Presenting Officer . That no misconduct as alleged was committed by the workman. The findings of the enquiry if any is preverse and without any evidence. Since the workman has not been supplied with a copy of the enquiry report, he is unable to comment upon the enquiry report . It is submitted that the way in which the enquiry was conducted, was in gross violation of principles of natural justice and the procedure adopted was arbitrary, unreasonable and unfair . It is submitted that the dismissal from service is wholly disproportionate to the nature of charges alleged and is far in excess . Therefore , the action of the management is liable to be quashed .

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been stated that the claimant workman Shri Ghanshyam was appointed as Bill Clerk w.e.f. 20-03-1988 with the respondent company and was posted at its Bar Gurjar Mines . That on 30-05-1993 during the course of spot inspection it was found that the aforesaid workman in direct dereliction of his duty allowed trucks (bearing registration No. HR- 29A 9665 , HRU 6617 and HRU 6598) to pass through the check post without issuing any cash memo and gate pass which was a mandatory requirement before such trucks could pass through . Accordingly, the competent authority immediately placed Shri Ghanshyam under suspension w.e.f. 31-05-1993 vide letter No. HML - DLI/ 93 / 1342 of the same date and directed that the claimant workman should report for attendance to the Corporate Office pending enquiry. That a charge sheet in respect of the offences found to have been committed by the claimant was prepared on 04-10-1993 and served upon the workman .

That on 11-10-1993 the claimant filed his reply to the charge sheet and denied the charges levelled against him . That on the basis of the charges levelled against the claimant vide charge sheet No. HML /DLI / 3844 dt . 04-10-1993 , enquiry proceedings were initiated and were held on several dates and the workman /claimant participated in the enquiry proceedings and was afforded adequate opportunity of defending himself. Witnesses were examined and cross -examined during the course of enquiry and the enquiry proceedings were concluded. Thereafter . a show cause notice was issued to the workman/claimant calling upon him to show cause as to why penalty of dismissal should not be imposed upon him on the ground that he was involved in allowing trucks (bearing registration No. HR-29A 9665 , HRU 6617 and HRU 6598 ) to pass through the check post without issuing any cash memo and gate pass which was the mandatory requirement before such trucks could pass through, which amounted to playing fraud on the company.

That subsequently the competent authority allowed personal hearing to the workman under suspension which fact was communicated to him vide respondent company's letter No. HML /DLI/ 94/ 6284 dt . 14-02-1994 wherein he was directed to appear before the managing Director for a personal hearing on 28-02-1994 at 11.00 AM in the CorporateOffice of the respondent company at New Delhi .

2322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] That despite such an opportunity of personal hearing being given to him and despite a second chance given to the erring workman, he did not turn up on the said date in the Corporate Office and since 05-02-1994 the said workman under suspension has not reported for duty to the concerned authority.

That thereafter the competent authority was left with no other option but to issue dismissal order on Shri Ghanshyam, the claimant/ workman as per service rules and the relevant bye laws on the basis of enquiry report vide their letter No. HML/DL1 / 94 / 6621 dt . 09-03-1994.

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In his rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his statement of clam and he has denied most the paras of the written statement .

Evidence of both the partics has been taken .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record .

Presenting Officer acted on their own whims and fancies and recorded the proceedings in the way they wanted it . No enquiry report was furnished to him. He received no enquiry report . Non - supply of enquiry report to the workman before passing the order of dismissal itself vitiates the entire action as it deprives the workman of the opportunity to make representations . No speaking order was passed and no reasoning was advanced. The workman was fined Rs . 2000 and was also dismissed from service . It was submitted from the side of the management that charge sheet was served upon the workman . The claimant filed his reply to the charge - sheet and denied the charges levelled against him . The enquiry proceedings were initiated and were held on several dates and the workman applicant participated in the enquiry proceedings and was afforded adequate oppotunity of defending himself. Witnesses were examined and cross- examined during the course of enquiry and the enquiry proceedings were concluded . A show- cause notice was issued to him as to why penalty of dismissal should not be imposed to him for the charges proved against him. The competent authority allowed personal hearing to the workman under suspension which was communicated to the workman by respondent/ management vide letter dt . 14-2-1994. He was directed to appear before the managing Director for personal hearing on 28-02-1994 . The workman did not turn up on the said date in the Corporate Office and hence dismissal order was issued against the workman applicant .

It was submitted by the workman applicant that there is no enquiry report so the copies of the enquiry report has not been supplied to the workman applicant . The Managing Director has punished the workman on the statement of witnesses and without any enquiry report . Shri Chawla was not competent to suspend him . It transpires from the perusal of the record that no enquiry has been held regarding the charges levelled against the workman applicant and there is no report of enquiry officer and no proper enquir, has been held and the workman applicant has not been given opportunity to produce his defence witnesses . As such , the enquiry is not fair.

The evidence of both the parties has been taken . The enquiry officer has not been produced but two management witnesses have deposed in the court and the workman applicant also has given his evidence . As such , there is no question of deciding the issue of preliminary enquiry as evidence by both the partics in support of the enquiry has already been given . It is quite obvious that no enquiry has been held and the workınan applicant has been vicitimized and punished without any evidence in the enquiry proceedings .

It was submitted from the side of the workman that his services were regularised at the post of Bill Clerk vide order dt . 21-7-1991 and he was posted at Headquarter, Faridabad . He has been discharging his duties satisfactorily . The management retrenched him vide order dt . 09-03-1994 . It was alleged that the claimant workman during the course of spot inspection on 30-05-1993, it was found that the aforesaid workman in direct dereliction of his duty allowed trucks (bearing regn . No. HR - 29A 9665. HRU 6617 and HRU 6598 ) to pass through the cheque posts without issuing any cash memo and gate pass which was a mandatory requirement before such truck could pass through . Accordingly, the competent authority immediately placed Shri Ghanshyam under suspension w.c.f. 31-5-1993 and he was directed to report for attendance to the Corporation office pending enquiry. The allegations of the Managing Director are falsc. As per diffcrent rules , the security guard on duty was to collect the documents from the billing clerk i.c. from the workman . No. security guard or any other person reported for duty and collected the documents from the workman . The workman left his place of work and again on 30-05- 1993 , the workman visited check post at about 8.00 AM with documents for handling over the same either to the security guard or to the billing clerk but none was on duty. Two labourers told him that there were four trucks inside the mines and the H.M.L. staff is not available on duty. So all the truck arc without token as there was none to give tokens to the truck. It has been further submitted that a false charge sheet dt. 04-10-1993 was served on hini for committing fraud on 03-05-1993 by allowing the vehicles to pass through cheque posts without cash memo and gate passes when he was posted at Bar -Gujjar. Charges were fake and indicative of pre- determination of the guilt .

It was submitted from the workman applicant that charges was confirmed against him as per paper 12 dated 11-10-1993 and inquiry was held on 03-12-1993 but there was no inquiry officer . Only two persons were present , Shri Ghanshyam charged employee and Shri S.N. Kaushik presenting employee . There is no name of the inquiry officer on the proceeding date 12-03-1993 , only charged employce and the Presenting Officer have put their It was further subinitted that Shri Anil Chawla , Corporate marketing manager conducted the enquiry and Shri S N. Kaushik appointed as Presenting Officer . The enquiry conducted against the workman in pursuance of the charge sheet dt . 4-10-1993 was a fake and sham one . No procedure was followed. The enquiry officer and tlıc 2323 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

without any evidence worth the name . Shri Anil Chawla is neither competent to suspend the workman and to conduct inquiry. The inquiry is a hollow sham .

The reference is replied thus .

It was argued from the side of the management that Haryana Minerals Limited has closed long long ago due to financial hardship . The unit has become sick . The Hon'ble Supreme Court in such circumstances has reduced the backwages . In this case also in view of the financial hardship.of the respondent the backwages of the workman applicant are reduced to 50 % .

signature . Paper No. 15 indicates that the workman produced one witness but he was not cross - examined. The inquiry was adjourned for 14-12-1993 ; on this day also there is signature of charged employee and the Presenting Officer, Shri S.N. Kaushik. Paper 16 is the inquiry -dated 21-12-1993 . In this case also Shri Suresh Chand , Driver, Ghanshyam charged employee and Shri S.N. Kaushik , Presenting Officer are present. There is signature of the Driver , Shri S.N. Kaushik and Shri Ghanshyam . Even the name of the Enquiry Officer has not been mentioned in this paper. It establishes beyond any doubt that the inquiry proceedings were held on 03-12-1993 , 07-12-1993 and 11-12-1993 but there is no name of the Enquiry Officer, as such the inquiry has been conducted in the absence of Enquiry Officer. No Inquiry Officer has been named anywhere. There is no Findings of the Enquiry Officer. The Managing Director has dismissed the workman from service without the report of the Enquiry Officer and the appellate authority has confirmed the order of the disciplinary authority..

The action of the management of Haryana Minerals Ltd. , Faridabad in dismissing the services without giving any opportunity to workman Shri Ghanshyam , Bill- Clerk w.e.f. 09-03-1994 is neither just nor legal . The workman applicant is entitled to be reinstated w.e.f. 09-03-1994 with 50% back wages . The management is directed to reinstate the workman/ applicant within two months after publication of the award and pay him 50 % backwages . In case ofdefault, the workman/ applicant will be entitledto 12% interest per annum on the backwages .

The award is given accordingly.

Dt . 08-02-2005

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 856.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के. संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हे दराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी.आई.डी. नम्बर 134/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/1/2005- आई. आर. ( सी- II) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi . the 15th February, 2005 It was further submitted from the side of the workman that in this case only four papers have been filed regarding Inquiry proceedings and there is no Enquiry Officer. I have tried to find out the name of the Inquiry Officer bút the name of the Inquiry Officer has not been mentioned above . Affidavit of Shri S.N. Dubey, Dy. Mining Engineer and Shri S.N. Kaushik have been filed but in that affidavit also it has been stated that Inquiry was initiated and the workman participated and defended himself but there is no name of the inquiry officer. When a inquiry is conducted it is necessary that there must be an Inquiry Officer . The two witnesses who have been produced in this case are not the inquiry officer Shri S. N. Dubey has stated in his cross - examination that he was neither the inquiry officer nor Presenting Officer. The second witness is Shri S.N. Kaushik he is the presenting officer . He has not even mentioned the name of the Inquiry Officer . He has admitted in his cross - examination that the documents dated 03-12-1993 and 21-12-1993 do not bear the signatures of the Inquiry Officer nor the presence of the inquiry officer has been noted and instead the signature of the witness Shri S.N. Kaushik and the workman has been taken . This witness has also admitted that no record can be filed in the case too so that the copies of the proceedings of the inquiry were supplied to the workman . It is correct that Shri Dharampal was brought by the workman for recording to his statement as defence witness but his statement was refused to be recorded.

S.O. 856. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central . Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L.C.I.D. 134/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-02-05 .

[No. L - 22013 / 1 / 2005 - IR (C - II) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer It was further submitted that from the perusal of the statement of these witnesses it becomes quit clear that no opportunity of cross - examination , the witnesses have been provided and Shri Dharampal , the witness brought by the workman applicant lhas not been examined but he was refused to be examined as such no opportunity to the workman/ applicant has been given for affording evidence in his defence . No inquiry officer has been appointed . The managing Director has passed order of dismissal without any report of the inquiry officer , whimsically , illegally and arbitrarily. There is absolutely no inquiry worth the name and the workman applicant has been dismissed

565 G1 /05-42 2324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Dated the 29th day of December, 2004

Industrial Dispute L.C.I.D. No. 134/2003

BETWEEN

Sh . G. Prabhuvaran,

S/ o Yohan ,

R/ o KK 1, Filterbed,

98 musters in 1999. Actually Respondent was magnanimous to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 9-2-2001 where he assured that he will put in 22 filling musters every month and filled two tubs and more musters thereafter. The workman was given time from 16-2-2001 to improve his musters but he could not . During the year 75 working days , the Petitioner has put in only 15 musters and hence a regular enquiry was conducted and he was dismissed from service . Hence , he is not entitled for any relief.

Mandmarri Area ,

Petitioner

Kalyan Khani Post , Adilabad District- 504 231.

AND

4. The domestic enquiry conducted is declared as valid by this Court vide order dated 27-9-2004 . Hence , arguments under Sec. 11A were heard by both the counsels.

The General Manager,

Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Mandamarri ,

Adilabad District.

Respondent

APPEARANCES :.

For the Petitioner :

5. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that he has filed Medical Certificates . That he could not attend due to his ill - health and due to fractures. Hence, the punishment is disproportionate to his fault . Hence, his case may be considered sympathetically and he may be reinstated .

M/s. P. Nageswar Rao & R Murali Krishna . Advocates

For the Respondent : M/ s . K. Srinivasa Murthy, V. Umadevi , C. Vijaya Shekar Reddy & B.V.L. Vani , Advocates

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act , 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others and notices were issuedto the parties concerned.

6. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondent that even if it is seen that this medical certificates are for 1999 what happened to this man when he was given a chance again to improve his work and on 9-2-2001 where the workman assured that he will put in 22 filling musters in every month and will fill two tubs, he was given three months time from 16-02-2001 to improve his musters and performance . But during the period there were 75 working days but he had put in only 15 musters . The fact is that having made up its mind yet, the company was fair enough in giving him a further chance and ultimately dismissed him vide order dated 4-7-2001 w.e.f. 26-7-2001 . He did not improve himself. Hence, he deserves no sympathy . The dismissal order dated 4-7-2001 may be upheld.

7. It may be seen that the Petitioner's conduct is far from satisfactory after the issuance of charge sheet also he deserves no sympathy. From 1999 to 2002 he did not improve . He was appointed in 1995 and 1999 only he started absenting himself. Without giving him another chance he was dismissed. As the quality of mercy is not strained I give him one more chance with certain strict conditions . An award is passed directing the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner as badli filler within 30 days after publication of this award on the starting pay of the badli filler as on that day. His past services shall not be counted for any purpose. His services shall be regularized as badli filler only if he puts in minimum musters for three consecutive years .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petition are : That the Petitioner was appointed as badli filler in 1995 and worked at KK 5A incline . He was issued with charge sheet dated 29-1-2000 for his habitual absence , 25.25 of Standing Orders of the Respondent company. " Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause" . That the Petitioner was sick and suffering from ill - health and intimated his sickness to the Respondent and submitted all the medical certificates , in spite of which the case of the Petitioner was not considered and he was removed from service . Much has been said about the enquiry but this Court by an order dated 27-9-2004 stated that the domestic enquiry conducted is valid . That he submitted that the Petitioner may be reinstated into service with backwages , full attendant benefits . That actually it is averred in the petition that while the Petitioner is returning home he net with an accident and his right hand wrist fractured due to which he got pain in right shoulder, which was made known to the Respondent . In spite of this pain the Petitioner has completed the musters as per norms . The punishment of dismissal is disproportionate. Hence, he may be reinstated into service .

Dictated to Smt . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant , transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 29th day of December, 2004 .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer 3. A counter was filed stating that he has put in only 106 musters in 1997. 59 musters in 1998 and [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2325

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 857.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण हैदराबाद (संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी.आई.डी. नम्बर 42/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22013/1/2005- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 857. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L.C.I.D. 42/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-02-05.

[No. L -22013/ 1 /2005 -IR (C - II) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 3rd day of January, 2005 Industrial Dispute L.C.I.D. No. 42/2004 Between:

Sh . Bandari Shankaraiah ,

S/o Rajam, C/ o Smt . A. Sarojana , 4-5-592 , Near Badichowdi , Vegetable Market ,

Petitioner Kutbiguda, Hyderabad .

And

1. The General Manager, Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , RG. I Area , Godavarikhani , Karimnagar District.

2. The Colliery Manager ,

Respondent GDK - 5A incline , Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. Godavarikhani , Karimnagar .

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner M/ s A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent : M/ s K. Srinivasa Murthy. C. Vijayasekhar Reddy, Advocates AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A (2 ) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others.

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petition are That the Petitioner was appointed as badli filler in the year 1990 and later confirmed as coal filler. From 1-4-96 onwards he was hospitalized and he was under continuous treatment upto 18-8-96 . It was intimated to the authorities from time to time. A charge sheet dated 9-3-97 was framed holding that the Petitioner was absent from duties for a period of 259 days during the year 1996 without sanctioned leave or sufficient cause . Various allegations were made against the domestic enquiry conducted but that need not be gone into as the Petitioner's Counsel conceded that the domestic enquiry is validly conducted . Petitioner submitted that he was issued with a charge sheet on 9-3-97 and he was dismissed on 10 / 11-2-98 . That the dismissal is highly disproportionate as his absence is oniy due to sickness . Hence , he may be reinstated with back wages with continuity of service etc.

3. A counter was filed stating that the Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on 27-8-90 and later on confirmed as coal filler on 1-9-95 . That the allegation of sickness is all false . He did not even attend the enquiry. That his actual attendance for 1994 was only 94 days , in 1995 is for 110 days . in 1996 is for 52 days and in spite of charge sheet being issued to him on 9-3-97 , he did not improve himself at all and upto August , 1997 he has pui in only 55 days .

4. No doubt , the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner argued a lot that some sympathy may be shown to him and the Respondent's counsel submitted that seeing his performance he may not be reinstated.

5. It may be seen that the moment he was made or even before he was made from badli filler to coal filler and first of all on 1-9-95 his attendance , even at the time ofhis promotion was very bad . Hence, giving him a chance an award is passed as follows : He shall be employed as badli filler on minimum pay scale on temporary basis within 30 days after publication of this award and his past services will not be taken into account for any purpose and his services be considered for confirmation only if he puts in minimum musters for three consecutive years .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

2326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 / PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

Dictated to Smt . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant , transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 3rd day of January , 2005.

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

NIL

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 858.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एटोमिक एनर्जी सेन्ट्रल स्कूल प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी.आई.डी. नम्बर 127/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22013/ 1/ 2005- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th February , 2005 S.O. 858. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L.C.I.D. 127/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Atomic Energy Central School and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-02-2005 .

[No. L- 22013 / 1 /2005 - IR ( C - II ) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B .. Presiding Officer Dated the 21st day of December , 2004 Industrial Dispute L.C.I.D. No. 127/2003 BETWEEN :

Smt. G. Shusheela,

W/o Yodagiri ,

R/ o Housing Board,

Rajiv Nagar,

Moulali,

Petitioner Hyderabad .

AND

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] The Principal. ,

Atomic Energy Central , School - 2 , D.A.E. Colony. E.C.I.L. ( Post) .

Hyderabad. Respondent APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : M/ s . G. Ravi Mohan , R. Devender Reddy, G. Srinivasa Reddy & G. Naresh Kumar , Advocates For the Respondent : M/ s . N. Rama Mohan Rao, K.S.V. Subba Rao , Abhinand K. Shavili , Siva & K. Sriniwasa Prasad , Advocates

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A ( 2) of the 1.D. Act , 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 127/2003 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2. The brief averments of the petition as stated by the Petitioner are : That the Petitioner was appointed as Sweeper/Attender in the Respondent school in the year 1991. Initially she was paid Rs . 400 p.m. Subsequently basing upon her industrious nature ofjob , her salary was enhanced to Rs . 1500. That she worked for 11 years continuously. Yet she has been dismissed from service orally from 1-11-2002 . The Respondent instead of being a model employer has terminated her services without any notice or terminal benefits on 1-11-2002 .

3. A counter was filed to the effect that the Respondent is not an industry ' . That the dispute is not maintainable and that there was lot of reshuffling and she became surplus . Hence. she was disengaged. She is not entitled for any relief.

4. The Petitioner was examined as WW1 . She marked Ex . WI interview letter . Ex . W2 representation and she was cross examined. The Respondent also examined Smt . M. Secthamahalakshmi ,ethamahalakshmi , Principal , Atomic Energy Central School - II . Hyderabad and she was cross examined .

5. While matters stood thus , this Court suggested for compromise if possible . Then the Respondent filed a memo of intimation of vacancy position . That there are vacancies at , ( 1 ) AECS . Mysore . (2 ) AECS , Kudankulam and (3 ) AECS , Kalpakkam . The petitioner's Counsel also filed a memo stating that the Petitioner agrees with the Respondent and willing to join at AECS , Mysore in a regular vacancy.

6. Hence , an award is passed in the following terms: The Petitioner, Smt . G. Shusheela, W/ o Yadagiri aged about 35 years, shall be appointed at atomic Energy Central School , Mysore in a regular vacancy of Sweeper/ Farash on using the good offices of the Respondent i.e ..

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

2327

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

Atomic Energy Education Society, Mumbai as agreed by the Respondent herein. The appointment shall be made on or before 1st February, 2005 failing which the Petitioner shall be entitled to last drawn wages from 1st February, 2005 .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant , transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 21st day of December, 2004.

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent WW1 : Smt G. Susheela MW1 : Smt . M. Seetha- mahalakshmi

Documents marked for the Petitioner Ex. WI : Copy of interview letter dt . 22-6-1995 .

Ex . W2 Copy of representation to the Principal dt. 21-6-95 .

Ex. W3 : Copy of representation to the Chairman dt. 20-9-96 .

Ex. W4 : Copy of service certificate.

Ex. W5 : Copy of Ir. of the Managementdt . 3-1-95 reg. regularization of services .

Documents marked for the Respondent Ex . MI Copy of statement showing WWI's total no. of working days from 1991 to November , 2002.

Ex . M2 Copy of statement showing WWI's total no . of working days from February, 1998 to November , 2002 .

Ex. M3 Copy of AEE's Ir . No. AEES/Academic Unit/ F1./97/297 dt. 24-4-1997 .

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 859.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एफ. सी. आई. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद (संदर्भ संख्या एल. सी. आई. डी . नम्बर 63/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22013/1/2005- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 859. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L. C. 1. D. No. 63/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers inrelation to the management of FCI and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-2-2005 .

[No. L- 22013/ 1/ 2005 - IR ( C - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 3rdday of January, 2005

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.I.D. No. 63/2003 BETWEEN :

Sri P. Anjaiah,

S/o P. Jogaiah ,

Ramapuram Village ,

Nereducharla Mandal ,

Petitioner Nalgonda District .

AND

1. The District Manager , Food Corporation of India ,

District Office,

Nalgonda.

2. The Senior Regional Manager,

Food Corporation of India ,

Progressive Towers ,

Khairatabad,

Hyderabad.

Respondents APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : M/ s . Κ . Κ. Chakravarthy & Y. Rama Krishna , Advocates Forthe Respondent : M/ s . B. G. Ravindra Reddy, B. V. Chandra Sekhar , Advocates

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s. Cotton Corporation of India and two Others .

2. The brief facts of the petition are ; That the Petitioner worked at Kodada , under District Manager, Nalgonda from 1976, 1977 and subsequently also till 1980 as watchman at Kodada ARDC Godowns . He was taken from employment exchange at Nalgonda District . The then officer also gave a certificate to him . Subsequently, his services were terminated orally. He made several representations to the Management . He filed WP No. 7459/ 2001 before the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. along with 2328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

three others S/ Sri Narasiaha , Seshagiri Rao and P. Punnaiah . That the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. by an order dated 22-8-2001 directed the Management to consider their case under Sec . 25 (B) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 on their fresh representation for appointment within a period of 3 months. Accordingly, he made a representation immediately along with his bio- data to consider his case . It was not considered . But the Management considered some other candidate stating that his name was not figured in the 110 persons identified by the Industrial Tribunal in ID No. 33/82 . Again on 19-12-2001 he made representation to the Senior Divisional Manager, Hyderabad stating that his name was not recorded in attendance register in monthly payment of salary which was acknowledged by him with revenue stamp. The Management gave a reply on 19-8-2002 that their Advocate informed that one Mr. Seshagiri Rao was appointed and himself and P. Punnaiah were not considered. Hence , the record may be called for to give him proper relief.

3. A counter was filed stating that the Petitioner never worked as an employee in Food Corporation of India at any point of time and there is no relationship of employer and employee and therefore Sec . 2A ( 2) is not attracted . Accordingly, the Petition is liable to be rejected. Further, there is abnormal delay of 23 years . Hence , he is not entitled for any relief. That the allegation that he worked from 1976 to 1980 in the FCI godown and he was terminated from service till 1980 is not correct . The allegation that he filed writ petition and yet he was not considered is wrong . In fact , his name was not included in the industrial dispute , in spite of that he falsely submitted before the Hon'ble Court that he was one of the workers in the industrial dispute and his case to be considered for the award in ID No. 33/82 that he never worked at any point of time. He is not given specific dates of appointment and termination . Hence , the petition is liable to be dismissed .

4. The Petitioner examined himself as WWI and deposed that he has worked in the FCI godown at Kodada Center under the District Manager. Nalgonda from 1976, 1977 and subsequently till 1980 as watchman . He was taken from the employment exchange . The then officer gave a certificate to him also. he was terminated orally. In the chief examination he deposed the facts as stated in petition . He also marked Ex . WI a copy of the transfer certificate dated 31-7-1973 . Ex . W2 is the office order appointing him along with others as watchman dated 7-5-76 . Ex . W5 is the order of the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. and other documents were marked . In his cross examination he deposed that he was not a party in the ID 33/1982 . That he was not sponsored by the employment exchange for any appointment if FCJ . Again , the witness says that he was sponsored by employment exchange . As per Ex . WI his case was rejected by the Food Corporation of India that he was not one of the 110 workers in ID 33 / 1982. That he filed the present ID after 23 years of his alleged termination .

5. He also examined one Assistant Grade III , Sri Ch . Prakasam , who deposed that he worked along with

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] the Petitioner as watchman from 1976 to 1979 at Kodada, FCI godown later, he was transferred to Miryalaguda FCI . That he and the Petitioner were appointed through employment exchange in the year 1976. He was made permanent in the year 1978. That the Petitioner is one month senior to him . In the cross -examination he deposed that the Petitioner joined as watchman on daily wages in the month of May, 1976 .

6. The Assistant Manager (Contracts) , Sri R. Lakshmi Narayana was examined as MW1 . He deposed that the Petitioner never worked with the FCI and all the persons who had worked during the relevant time has raised an industrial dispute which was registered as ID No. 33/1982 . An Award was passed on 19-12-1984 which is Ex. M1 , the name of the Petitioner is not there . The Petitioner filed writ Petition No. 7459/2001 wherein he had stated that his name was included in the reference but the same is not correct . Ensuing the orders of the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. his name was considered as he had not worked with FCI in any point of time , his case was rejected . Ex. M2 is the copy of the order dated 19-4-2001 in WP No. 7459/2001 . Ex. M3 is the copy of writ petition filed by the Petitioner in the Hon'ble High Court ofA.P. He cannot confirm the genuinity of Ex . W2 office order dated 7-5-76 subınitted by the Petitioner . In the cross - examination he deposed that he was not there during the year 1976-78 . He is not aware of Ex . W16 .

7. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that he was dismissed in 1980 as watchman, Kodada ARDC Godown although he worked from 1976 . He filed writ petition No. 7459/2001 but the orders were not implemented. That the contention that the Petitioner is not an employee and there is no employer and employee relationship is not correct . He relies on AIR 1949 Bombay page 141 wherein it was held .. " as far as the Act is concerned, the Tribunal has power to adjudicate upon all matters in dispute between the employer and the worker " andhe also relies on 1958 AIR Supreme Court cases page 1026 , wherein it was held , that , " Where the workmen raise a dispute as against their employer, the person or persons regarding whose employment or non - employment the dispute is raised need not be , strictly speaking "workmen" within the meaning of the Act but must be persons in whose employment or non - employment the "workmen " as a class have a direct or substantial interest" He submits that the evidence of WWI is created by a person who is still in job would have deposed falsely merely he is not a party in ID No. 33/1982 is not a valid ground to dismiss the case.

8. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondents that the Petitioner never worked in the corporation either as casual labour or as contract labour at any point . The evidence of WW2 is not at all correct . The Petitioner has not given any specific date in pursuance to the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. where hehas gone claiming falsely that he was one of the parties in ID No. 33/1982 before the Industrial Tribunal was found false . Hence , his case was not considered and he is not entitled for any relief.

2329 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

Ex. W6 Copy of notice issued by Respondent to WW1 dt. 25-9-2001

Ex . W7 Copy of application dt . 29-9-2001 .

Ex . W8 Copy of Ir. No. IR. 32 (3 )/2001 dt. 11-10-2001

Ex . W9 Copy of WWI's letter dt . 18-10-2001

Ex . W10 : Copy of Ir . No. IR 32 ( 3 )/2001 dt . 20-10-2001

Ex . W11 : Copy of Ir. No. IR 32( 3)/ 2001 dt. 12-11-2001

Ex. W12 : Copy of representation of WW1 dt . 26-11-2001 9. It may be seen that the District Manager , appointed the Petitioner Sri P. Anjaiah temporarily as watchman on daily rated basis . MW1 says that he cannot say anything about the genuineness or otherwise of this Ex. W2 . Only Ex . M1 wherein it was ordered that the Petitioners in the said ID 33/1982 be considered for fresh appointment in the new depots that are likely to be opened and also ordered for retrenchment compensation under Sec . 25F of the Act . Ex . M2 is the order of the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. wherein a direction is given to make a fresh representation and the Respondent to consider the same .

Ex . W13 : Copies of affidavits of WW1's colleagues

Ex . W14 : Copy of WW1's representation dt. 19-12-2001

Ex. W15 : Copy of Ir. written by advocate of WW1 dt . 21-1-2002

Ex . W16 : Copy of Ir . No. A2 / 159/ 2002dt . 27-3-2002

Ex . W17 : Copy of employment card of WW1

Ex. W18 : Copy of WW1's representationdt. 13-6-2002

Ex. W19 : Copy of legal notice dt . 5-8-2002

Ex. W20 : Copy of reply received for Ex . W19 dt . 19-8-2002

Documents marked for the Respondent

Ex. M1 Copy of award in ID No. 33/1982 of Industrial Tribunal , Hyderabad

Ex . M2 : Copy of order of High Court in WP 7459/2001

Ex. M3 Copy of affidavit of P. Narasaiah

Authorization letter to depose in the Court. Ex. M4

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

10. So it may be safely concluded that on this said direction he produced Ex. W2 and moreover when his . colleague WW2 comes and deposes that he had worked along with the Petitioner it cannot be disputed. But one thing is clear, Ex . M3 the affidavit is sworn in by Shri N. Narasimha in ID No. 33/1982 , he deposed that they filed ID No. 33/1982 , the Petitioner's name is not there . In fact WW1 admitted that he is not one of the Petitioners . Any way the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. has directed to consider their names . When his name is not considered saying that he is not one of the parties in ID No. 33/1982 but in view of Ex . W2 and evidence of WW2 , I hold that in respect of the fact that he is unable to give the exact dates perhaps due to lapse of time that he has worked. But approached this Court after lapse of more than two decades . In fact , he himself is not sure of what he wants . Because he only wants appointment but after a generation lapse he cannot come and ask for a fresh appointment , and hence , the only relief that can be given to him is that ifthere are casual/ temporary vacancies available in future the Petitioner shall be given preference over others taking his date of appointment as 1976 and his age as on 1976 provided he is medically fit . However, this award will not disturb those who are working at present due to this award .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant , transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 3rd day of January , 2005 .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer

का. आ. 860.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस. सी. सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद (संदर्भ संख्या एल. सी. आई. डी. नम्बर 136/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

[सं. एल-22013/1/2005- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी WWI : Sri P. Anjaiah

New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 MW1 : Sri R. Lakshmi Narayana

WW2 : Sri Ch . Prakasam

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex. WI : Copy of transfer certificate dt . 31-7-73

Ex . W2 Copy of appointment order dt . 7-5-76

Ex. W3 Copy of community, nativity and date of birth certificate dt . 13-11-98

S.O. 860. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L. C. 1. D. No. 136/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-2-2005.

Copy of representation dt. 2-8-2001

Ex. W4

Ex. W5 Copy of order of High Court in WP 7459/2001

[No. L - 22013/1 / 2005 - IR ( C - 11 ) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

1 2330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

conducted. The Petitioner has put in only 70 musters in 1995, 100 musters in 1996 and only 16 musters in 1997 . The workman has attended the enquiry and during the enquiry admitted his charges . Hence , he was dismissed on 16-12-98 .

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer

Dated the 29th day of December, 2004

4. The domestic enquiry conducted is declared as valid by this Court vide order dated 27-9-2004 . Hence , arguments under Sec . 11 A were heard by both the counsels .

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.I.D. No. 136/2003

Between :

Sri Barla Ankoos ,

S/ o Ilaiah ,

H.No. 60/63 ,

5. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that he has filed fitness certificates . That he could not attend due to his ill - health . Hence , the punishment is disproportionate to his fault. Hence , his case may be considered sympathetically and he may be reinstated.

Mandamarri area ,

Mandamari ,

Petitioner

Adilabad District - 504231

AND

The General Manager,

Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. ,

Mandamarri ,

Adialabad District .

Respondents

APPEARANCES :

6. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondent that it is seen that fitness certificates were not produced. Show cause notice along with Enquriy proceedings were sent by registered post acknowledgement due to his last known address and it was returned as undelivered by postal authorities . What happened to this man when a paper publication was given to that effect . Hefailed to respond to the paper publication also .Hence , he deserves no sympathy. The dismissal order may be upheld.

For the Petitioner : M/ s P. Nageswar Rao & R. Murali Krishna , Advocates

For the Respondent : M/ s K. Srinivasa Murthy, V.

Umadevi , C. Vijaya Shekar Reddy

& B.V.L. Vani , Advocates .

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec. 2A (2) of the 1.D. Act , 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s. Cotton Corporation of India and two others and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petitionare:

7. It may be seen that Petitioner's conduct is far from satisfactory after the issuance of charge sheet also , he deserves no sympathy. He was appointed in 1978 and 1995 only he started absenting himself. Without another chancebeing given to him he was dismissed . As the quality of mercy is not strained I give him one more chance with certain strict condition. An award is passed directing the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner as coal filler within 30 days after publication of this award on the starting pay ofthe coal filler as on that day. As there is no mention as to when he has completed his training as coal filler his services from 1-1-80 till 16-12-98 shall be counted for terminal benefits and his services shall be regularized as coal filler only if he puts in minimum musters for three consecutive years .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant , transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 29th day of December , 2004.

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for

the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

NIL

That the Petitioner was appointed as coal filler and wored at KK 5 incline . He was issued with charge sheet for his habitual absence , 25.25 of Standing Orders of the Respondent company, " Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause " . That the Petitioner was sick and suffering from lumbargo and ScintricPain and intimated his sickness to the Respondent and submitted all the medical certificates , in spite of which the case of the Petitioner was not considered and he was removed from service . Much has been said about the enquiry but this Court by an order dated 27-9-2004 stated that the domestic enquiry conducted is valid. That he submitted that the Petitioner may be reinstated into service with back wages , full attendant benefits . That the punishment of dismissal is disproportionate . Hence , he may be reinstated into service .

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

3. A counter was filed stating that the Petitioner was appointed at KK5 incline on 6-6-78 as a Worker Trainee . That he was issued with a charge sheet dated 12/ 28-3-98 for habitual absence and a regular enquiry was [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 861.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में एस. सी . सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या एल. सी. आई . डी. नम्बर 135/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/1 / 2005- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 861. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L. C. I. D. No. 135/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-2-2005 .

[No. L- 22013/1 /2005 - IR ( C -II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 29th day of December, 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.I.D. No. 135/2003

BETWEEN

Sri Chand Pasha,

Petitioner S/ o S. K. Hussain, No, 206 ; Hanuman Basti , Bellampalli , Adilabad Dist.

AND

The General Manager ,

Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Mandamarri area, Mandamarri , Adilabad District

2331

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

AWARD

2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petition are : That the Petitioner was appointed as Tunnel Mazdoor in 1990 and worked at Shantikhani , B.P.A. ( P) Area . He was issued with charge sheet dated 4-8-99 for his habitual absence , for contravening 25.31 , " Absence from duty without sanctioned leave or sufficient cause over staying beyond leave" . That the Petitioner was sick and intimated his sickness to the Respondent and inspite of which the case of the Petitioner was not considered and he was removed from service . Much has been said about the enquiry but this Court by an order dated 27-9-2004 stated that the domestic enquiry conducted is valid. That he submitted that the Petitioner may be reinstated into service with back wages , full attendant benefits . He submits that actually it is averred in the petition that the Petitioner was sick and produced the relevant documents to prove his sickness and after his recovery, he joined duty. His sickness was in the knowledge of the Respondent . The punishment of dismissal is disproportionate to the alleged offence.Hence, the dismissal order dated 24-10-2001 may be set aside and the Petitioner may be resinstated into service with continuity of service and with all attendant benefits.

3. A counter was filed stating that the Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on 20-4-88. Later on he was drafted as tunnel mazdoor w.e.f. 1-9-90 . That on 4-8-99 he was issued with a charge sheet for absence of duty without sufficient cause . So an enquiry was conducted. That the Petitioner was dismissed w.e.f. 9-10-2001 . In fact he did not attend the enquiry as such the charges were proved. In fact a publication was also made in Eenadu daily newspaper. That the Respondent had no knowledge of his alleged sickness . Hence , the petition is devoid of merits . Hence, he is not entitled for any relief.

4. The domestic enquiry conducted is declared as valid by this Court vide order dated 27-9-2004 . Hence , arguments under Sec. 11 A were heard by both the counsels .

Respondents

APPEARANCES : For the Petitioner : M/sP. Nageswar Rao & Murali Krishna, Advocates

Forthe Respondent : M/ s K. Srinivasa Murthy, V. Umadevi , C. Vijaya Shekar Reddy & B.V.L. Vani , Advocates 565 G1/05-43

5. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that he has filed medical certificates . That he could not attend due to his ill - health . Hence , the punishment is disproportionate to his fault. Hence, his case may be considered sympathetically and he may be reinstated.

6. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondent that it is seen that the medical certificates were not produced. Show cause notice along with Enquiry proceedings were sent by registered post acknowledgement due to his last known address and it was returned with the endorsement of the postal Department that it was unclaimed. What happened to this man when a paper 2332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

publication was given to that effect . He has failed to respond to the paper publication also . Hence , he deserves no sympathy. The dismissal order may be upheld.

7 It may be seen that he was appointed in 1990 and he started absenting himself. Without giving another chance to him he was dismissed. As the quality of mercy is not strained I give him one more chance with certain strict conditions . An award is passed directing the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner as Tunnel Mazdoor within 30 days after publication of this award on the starting pay of the Tunnel Mazdoor as on that day . His past services from 1-9-90 10 8-10-2001 shall be counted for pension purposes as no chance was given for counseling, only on condition that he puts in minimum musters for three consecutive years .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 29th day of December, 2004 .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली , 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 862.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस. सी. सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या एल. सी . आई. डी. नम्बर 185/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

| सं . एल-22013/ 1/ 2005- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी . केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th February: 2005 S.O. 862. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. L. C. 1. D. No 185/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court . Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-2-2005 .

[No. L -22013/ 1 / 2005 - IR ( C - II ) ] N. P KESAVAN , Desk Officer

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 5th day of November, 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.I.D. No. 185/2003 Between :

Sri Gattaiah ,

C/o 16-9-749/41 .

Race Course Road,

OldMalakpet.

Petitioner Hyderabad

AND

1. The Managing Director , The Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. ,

Kothagudem .

2. The General Manager ,

The Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. ,

Ramagundam Area - 1 .

Karimnagar District

Respondents APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner M/ s . G. Ravi Mohan , R. Devender Reddy, G. Srinivasa Reddy & G. Naresh Kumar, Advocates

For the Respondent : M/ s K. Srinivasa Murthy, C.

Vijaya Sekhar Reddy & S. Vijay Venkatesh , Advocates .

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2A (2) of the I.D. Act , 1947 in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Andtıra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s. Cotton Corporation of India and two others and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 185/2003 .

2. Inspite of several adjournments given from 16-4-2004 for evidence of the Petitioner for 12 adjournments the Petitioner has not turned out . He is not evincing any interest in the case . Petitioner's counsel is also absent. There is nothing on record to support the case of the Petitioner . Hence , a Nil Award is passed , Transmit.

Award passed accordingly . Transmit.

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 5th day of November, 2004 .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer

1 2333 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

STATE : WEST BENGAL

INDUSTRY : COAL

Appendix of evidence

Dated 16-12-2004 Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

AWARD

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Govt . of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012 / 165/99 /IR ( CM - II ) dated 30/31-8-1999 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Benaly (R) Colliery in denying Medical Examination for age assessement to Sh . Ruidas , Underground Looseman is justified ? If not , to what relief Sh . Ruidas is entitled ?"

का. आ. 863.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, ई. सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , असनसोल ( संदर्भ संख्या 149/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/165/1999- आई . आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005

2. After receipt of the aforesaid order of reference summons were issued to the respective parties through the registered post and after having received the summons both the parties appeared in the Court through their representatives and filed their separate set of written statement in support of their respective claims .

S.O. 863. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. 149/1999 of the Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of ECL and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 15-2-2005.

3. The case of the union in brief compass as setforth in the written statement is that Sh . Lakhu Ruidas , U.G. Looseman Nageshwar Satgram Colliery had raised his age dispute in the year 1987 while returning of one copy ofthe service excerpts format and his case was considered by the Screening Committee at Area level and accordingly his case was recommended for assessment of his age by Apex Medical Board as per the guidelines of implementation instruction No. 76 .

[No. L - 22012/ 165 / 1999 -IR ( CM - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT :

Sri Md . Sarfaraz Khan , Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO . 149 OF 1999

PARTIES

TheAgent ,

Nageshwar Satgram Colliery,

P.O. Devchandnagar ,

Distt . Burdwan (W.B.)

Management

Vrs.

Workman

Sri Lakhu Ruidas , U.G. Looseman

4. The main case of the workman concerned is that he was asked to appear before the Apex Medical Board at Kalla Hospital on 14-2-91 and at Bansra Hospital also on same day but local management directed him to send at Kalla. But unfortunately Apex Medical Board could not be held on 14-2-91 due to the reasons best known to the management . As per norms he should have been called again but since then he was not called to appear before ApexMedical Board . The workman concerned along with the union have been requesting and trying to get another date fixed by the Apex Board for the assessment of the age but it could not be yet be finalised . The management had admitted to dispose of the matter since the matter had already been sent to headquarters for taking necessary action in this regard but inspite of the assurance given, dispute could not yet be resolved. So it is prayed that the workman concerned be sent to Apex Medical Board for age assessment as he was not given chance to appear before the Apex board.

REPRESENTATIVES

:Sri P. Goswami , Advocate

For the Management

For the Workman

: Sri Rakesh Kumar ,

General Secretary,

(Union)

5. On the other hand the defence case of the management as per its written statement in short is thatit is not correct to say that the concerned workman was directed to appear in two different places at the sametime. on the same date .

K.M.Co. , Asansol 2334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

and whether the concerned workman appeared before the Board on that fixed date or not ?

6. The main case of the management is that it was firstly decided to hold the sitting of Medical Board at Bansra Hospital and accordingly all the persons concerned were directed to appear at Bansra Hospital but Chairman of the Apex Medical Board intimated the office to change the venue from Bansra to Central Hospital at Kalla and to that effect Dy. Personnel Manager, Benali Colliery through an office order vide No. BC/ AGENT/PER- 67 /91/211 dated 11/12 February, 91 informed all those persons requesting them to appear at Central Hospital at Kalla .

7. It is also the case of the management that the concerned union for the first time raised an Industrial dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner on 6-9-98 after a long seven years and in the light of the decision of Apex could the dispute regarding correction of age in the service record at the fag - end of service life ought not to be entertained and even the union did not disclose the reason preventing them to agitate the same in time and on the grounds of latches and delay on the part of union this matter be rejected and at present the workman concerned is not entitled to any relief.

8. In view of the pleadings of the parties and the materials available on the record I do find certain facts which are admitted one by the respective parties . So before entering into the discussion of the merit of the case I would like to mention the facts which are admitted one .

9. It is admitted fact that Sri Ruidas, Underground Looseman is an permanent employee of the colliery of M/s. E.C.L.

14. It is clear from the averments made in para 3 ofthe workman that the workman attended Kalla Hospital along with P.O. of the colliery. But unfortunately Apex Board could not be held on 14-2-91 due to the reason best known to the management. It is also pleaded that the workman concerned and the union were requesting and trying to get another date fixed by the Apex board for the assessment of his age but the same could not be done till to-day. This fact has also been clearly stated in his affidavit filed in the Court by way of evidence . In course of cross exam. he clearly asserted the fact about his appearance before the medical Board . Where as this fact has neither been controverted in the W. S. of the management nor any chit ofpaper has been filed in the Court to show that the Apex Medical Board was held as per this Scheduled date at the fixed venue . It is specifically pleaded in para 2 ofthe W. S. filed by the management that contention of para 3 of the W. S. filed by the union is partially correct. Simply the contention of appearance at two different places ofthe Medical Board at the same time and same date has been contradicted . The remaining contention remained un- challenged meaning there by admitted by the management . So it is clear from the record itself that there is no fault on the part of the workman concerned due to which his age could not be assessed by the Apex Medical Board. If the Medical Board was not held on the scheduled date as per the programme , the workman should have been called again to appear before the medical Board for the assessment of his age as per the norms and provision of the Implementation Instruction guidance No. 76 and denied to that effect amounts to denial of the principles of natural justice.

10. It is further admitted fact that Lakhu Ruidas , U.G. Looseman of Nageshwar Satgram Colliery had raised his age dispute in the year 1987 and his case after consideration and having found wrong entry of his age his case was recommended for the assessment of his age by Apex Board as per the guide lines of Implementation instruction No. 76 .

15. The next important issue for the consideration is to see as to whether the Industrial Dispute regarding the correction of age in the service record was raised by the union before the Assistant Labour Commissioner after a long span of time.

11. It is also the admitted case that the workman was asked to appear before Medical Board at Bansra Hospital on 14-2-9 1 which was subsequently modified and the venue was fixed at Central Hospital at Kalla on the same date . It is the settled principles of law that the facts admitted need not be proved and as such I do not think necessary to discuss these admitted facts in detail.

16. In this context the workman has pleaded in para 5 of the W. S. that during the conciliation proceeding management had submitted their statement mentioning therein that the dispute be closed or keep it in abeyance as the matter has already been taken up by the ECL /H . Qtrs . or its amicable settlement . In support of the said facts the photo copy of the W.S. filed by the management before the A.L.C. (C) in the conciliation proceeding dated 24-12-98 has been filed . It is clear from the said written statement that recently ECL . H. Qtrs . vide its letter dated 31-10-98 and solicited the details of the age records of the workman concerned which was complied on 5-11-98 . But the management did not take any final decision as yet and kept the matter pending .

12.om the aforesaid admitted fact it is clear that there wasiation in the entry of the date of birth of the workman in service records so the Screening Committee of the Area level recommended of his case for assessment of age by the Apex Medical Board as per the guide lines of 1.1 . No. 76 and accordingly the workman concerned was directed to appear before the Apex Medical Board at Bansra Hospital on 14-2-91 which was modified on 12-2-91 and the venue was fixed at Central Hospital , Kalla on 14-2-91 which is proved from the photo copy of both the official letters filed by the union .

13. Now the main point to be decided is to see as to whether the Apex Board was held on the Scheduled date at scheduled modified venue at Central Hospital . Kalla

17. From perusal of the above W. S. filed before the A. L. C. by the management it appears that a plea has been taken there that a date for the assessment of the age ofthe workman concerned was fixed on 14-2-1991 at 9.30 and he was asked to appear before the Apex Medical Board atBansra Hospital but Sh . Lakhu Ruidas failed to appear די [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2335

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

before the said Apex Medical Board at Bansra Hospital . Admittedly the workman was asked to appear in the Apex board on 14-2-91 at 9.30 at Bansra Hospital by order dated 8-2-91. But subsequently vide letter dated 12-2-91 the order dated 8-2-91 was modified and he was directed to attend Apex Medical Board at Central Hospital, Kalla instead of Bansra Hospital on 14-2-91 at 10.00 A.M. So the ground taken by the management that Lakhu Ruidas did not appear before the Apex Medical Board at Bansra Hospital on the scheduled date is quite absurd as the questionafter modification of the venue to attend the Apex Medical Board at Bansra Hospital does not arise . This lame execute does not stand good. The circumstance go to show the victimising tendency of the management because ofthe fact that on 14-2-91 no Apex Medical Board was held as per schedule.

18. The Xerox copy of the minutes of the meeting held with the union i.e. K. M. C. at ECL . H. Quarters level dated 22-12-2002 has been filed in which age dispute ofthe workman was discussed and after discussion it was mentioned in item No. 20 of the minutes that the case of age assessment by Apex Medical Board of the workman is under examination . So it is clear that the delinquent workman has been regularly taking steps at every level for getting his age assessed by the Apex Medical Board. Besides this there is no period of limitation to raise the age dispute as well.

19. However in view of the above facts , circumstances , evidence , documents and the discussion made I am satisfied for hold that no Apex Medical Board was ever held on 14-2-91 at the modified scheduled venue at Central Hospital , Kalla and since the delinquent workman was not at fault and there is no any latches or delay on the part of the union . So for the ends ofjustice Sh . Lakhu Ruidas should have been called to appear before the Apex Board for the assessment of his age as per the guide lines of Implement Instruction No. 76 of JBCCI and in this circumstance I am further satisfied to hold that it is a fit case which must be referred to the Apex Medical Board for the assessment of the age of the delinquent employee and as such it is hereby

ORDERED

that let the management be directed to refer the delinquent employee to the Apex Medical Board for determination ofhis age within 15 days of the receipt of this award. The findings of the Apex Medical Board shall be final and binding upon both the parties . Accordingly the award be and the same is passed.

Copies of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour for information and needful.

MD. SARFARAZ KHAN, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 864.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी.आई.डी. नम्बर 41/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22013/1 /2005- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 864. In pursuanceance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. L.C.I.D. No. 41/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-02-2005 .

[No. L-22013/ 1 / 2005 - IR (C- II) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail, B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 22nd day of November , 2004 Industrial Dispute L.C.L.D. No. 41/2004 BETWEEN :

Sh . V. Sridhar,

S/o Samaiah,

C/o Mrs. A. Sarojana ,

4-5-92, Near Badichowdi ,

Vegetable Market ,

Petitioner Kutbiguda , Hyderabad - 27

AND

1. The General Manager , The Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , Mandamarri Area , Mandamarri .

2. The Colliery Manager, The Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , KK-5A incline , Kalyankhani , Adilabad

Respondent APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner :M/ s A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

Forthe Respondent : M/ s K. Srinivasa Murthy, V. Uma Devi , C. Vijaya Shekar Reddy & S. Vijay Venkatesh , Advocates 2336

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5, 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

AWARD

का.आ. 2230 दिनांक 19-8-2004 द्वारा यूरेनियम उद्योग जोकि औद्यौगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि19 में शामिल है, को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 15-9-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation of India and two other and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 41/2004 and notices were issued to the parties concerned .

औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है;

अतः अब, औद्यौगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खंड ( द ) के उप - खंड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 15-3-2005 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है । 2. The brief facts as stated in the petition are : That the Petitioner was initially appointed as badli coal filler on 14-4-2000 with the Respondent . He become sick during the years 2002 and he used to apply for leave or used to intimate the authorities. He was issued with charge sheet for absenteeism and ultimately dismissed by the Respondent vide order dated 24-1-2004 . Hence , he prays . * fór reinstatement .

[संख्या एस -11017/9/97- आई आर ( पीएल ) ] जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

New Delhi , the 24th February, 2005

3. A counter was filed denying that the Petitioner became sick during the year 2000 and he never reported sick in the Company's hospital . As the charges have been proved he was dismissed .

4. The counsel for the Petitioner filed a memo on 22-11-2004 to withdraw the petition stating that , basing on the settlement entered into , the Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , is willing to consider the case of the petitioner, for re - appointment . Hence , the Petitioner prays to permit him to withdraw LCID No. 41 / 2004 with liberty to file fresh case if required.

S.O. 865.- Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so required that in pursuance of the provisions of sub- clause ( vi ) of the clause ( n) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 2230 dated 19-8-2004 the service in Uranium Industry which is covered by item 19 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 15th September, 2004 .

5. Respondent's Counsel is present . In view of the memo fild by the Counsel for the Petitioner , a ' Nil ' Award ispassed.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

And whereas, the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said by a further period of six months .

Dictated to Sri J. Vijay Sarathi , LDC transcribed by him corrected and pronounced by me on this the 22nd day ofNovember, 2004.

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub -clause (vi ) of clause ( n) of Section 2 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act . for a period of six months from the 15th March , 2005 .

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

[No. S. 11017 /9 / 97 - IR ( PL) ] J. P. PATI , Jt . Secy.

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 866.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पश्चिम रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या केस सं सी.जी.आई.टी. / एल.सी./ आर . /175/92) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -41012/ 39/ 92- आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव का. आ. 865.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसाकरना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खंड ( ढ़ ) के उप - खंड ( vi ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 866. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Case No. CGIT/ LC /R/ 175 / 92 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Jabalpur now shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-02-2005 .

[No. L -41012/39/ 92 - IR (B - I ) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Case No. CGIT / LC/ R/ 175/92

Present :

Shri C.M. Singh , Presiding Officer Shri Mangoo Singh , S/ o Chen Singh .

Through Secretary. General Workers Union , Railway Quarter S. 406 -B. Godhara.

Applicant

Versus

The Divisional Electrical Engineer.

Construction Power, Western Railway . Ratlam .

The Divisional Railway Manager, Western Railway. Ratlam.

Non-applicant

AWARD

Passed on this 19th day of January- 2005.

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L-41012/ 39 /92 - IRDUdated 12/ 8/92 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Divisional Electrical Engineer Construction Power, Western Railwy, Ratlam in terminating the services of Shri Mangoo Singh S/ o Chen Singh Ex- Khalasi without any chargesheet or enquiry is justified or not? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled for ?"

2. The workman's ( Applicant) case in brief is that he was recruited as casual labour on 21/4/1980 and had put in seven years of continuous service . He had acquired the status of temporary employee on 1st Dec. 1981 and his services were governed and protected by the relevant

2337

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

provisions of the State Establishment Code and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The workman had reported sick on 16/11/1987 and remained under medical treatment till 29-12-87 . Both the medical certificates of sickness and fitness were issued by the Railway Doctor. However the management (non - applicant )terminated the services ofworkman orally without serving any written order. The management did not care to observe the procedure laid down in the State Railway Establishment Code . Later the workman along with Medical Certificates served notice dated 15-8-88 on the management , which remained un- replied by the management . The prayer of the workman is that the oral order dated 29-12-87 of his discharge be quashed and set aside and he be ordered to be re- instated in service with all back wages , benefits , priviledges , seniority and bonus etc.

3. In their written statement, the management (Non- applicant) admitted that the workman was appointed as casual labour on 21st day ofApril 1980 and was granted temporary status on 1st day of December 1981. It has been pleaded on behalf of the management that for unauthorised absence of workman from duty from 23-3-87 to 30-3-87 and 29-4-87 to 3-8-87. S.F. - 11 was issued to him which was still pending. That the workman remained present on duty from 4-8-87 to 11-11-87 and again absented himself from duty from 12-11-87 and abandoned the service.

4. In his rejoinder , the workman ( Applicant ) averred that the alleged S.F - 11 chargesheet for the alleged unauthorised absence from duty has already lapsed by afflux of time . The management did not issue and serve any notice on the workman. It has been also averred that the workman was under medical treatment of a Private Doctor from 16-11-87 to 29-12-87 and the Railway Doctor had issued a ' Duty Certificate' to him on the basis of the said medical certificate . The management did not take him on duty even after production of the said medical certificate from the Railway Doctor.

5. Shri D.N. Dixit , my learned predecessor in office after going through the written argument filed by the parties passed award dated 6-8-99 in favour of the management . The Honourable High Court of Madhya Pradesh vide order dt. 24-4-2004 passed in writ petition No. 471/2002 set aside award dated 6-8-99 and remanded the reference with direction that the tribunal shall consider the medical certificate issued by the Railway Doctor and other attending circumstances that the workman was not served with the notice said to have been issued by the department.

6. The workman Shri Mangoo Singh examined himself in support of his case and the management examined R.K. Kashive , Sr. Section Engineer, witness No. I and Daulat Warfe , pensioner witness No. 2 in order to defend the case . The parties also filed documents in support of their respective case which shall be referred in the body of this award at appropriate places.

7. I have heard Shri J.K. Ved , representative of the Union for the workman ( Applicant ) and Shri H.Y. Mehta , 2338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

Advocate , learned counsel for the management ( non- applicant) . 1 have very carefully gone through the entire evidence on record .

8. It is admitted to the parties that workman Mangoo Singh was appointed as casual labour on 21-4-1980 and was granted the status of temprary employee on 1-12-81 .

9. It is stated by the workman Mangoo Singh in hisrejoinder affidavit that he was under medical treatment ofa Private Doctor and had produced Medical Certificate to cover period w.e.f. 16-11-87 to 29-12-87 . It is further stated therein that the Railway Doctor had issued ' Duty Certificate to him on the basis of the said medical certificate . That he was not taken on duty even on production of Railway Doctor's certificate. Against the above, it has been pleaded on behalf of the management that the workman remained absent from duty from 12-11-87 and thereafter he never turned up on duty. The same has been deposed by R.K. Kashive , management's witness No. 1 in his examination- in - chief. But the deposition made in this respect by Daulat Warfe Management's witness No. 2 is quite different. He deposed that the workman permanently remained absent from 13-11-87. In his cross examination , the workman Mangoo Singh stated that from 12-11-87 , he was no doubt absent but was on leave and from 16-11-87 to 29-11-87 he was ill. From the above oral testimony of witnesses of management . It is not proved that the workman remained absent from duty from 12-11-87 as pleaded by the management . The workman has filed a photocopy of Duty Certificate purporting to have been issued by the Railway Doctor . The learned counsel for the management assailed this photocopy of Duty Certificate' by contending that it is inadmissible in evidence because it is not proved in accordance with law of evidence . He submitted that the workman did not examined the Railway Doctor as witness who gave the 'Duty Certificate ', to give evidence insupport of certificate . In this respect he placed reliance on 1983. LAB.1.C. 1285 in the case of Bengal Coal Co. Ltd. V Sew Pujan, Harjan . The following was held in the law cited above :

"In order to make the document or Certificate legally admissible the doctors giving the same must come and give evidence in support of the certificate , otherwise the contents of the certificate do not become admissible in law."

In the case at hand , according to statement of workman Mangoo Singh , he remained under medical treatment of a Private Doctor and on the basis of medical certificate issued by him . Railway Doctor issued ' Duty Certificate to him . It clearly means that the original medical certificate was that which is said to have been issued by the Private doctor to the workman. But the said medical certificate has not been brought on record for proving the duty Certificate said to have been issued by the Railway Doctor. More so , the workman has filed photostat copy of the alleged duty certificate on record . Besides the above , the workman has failed to examine the Railway Doctor who issued Duty Certificate . Therefore

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] I am of the considered opinon that the photostat copy of 'Duty Certificate ' is not legally admissible in evidence and thus the workman has failed to establish by medical evidence that he remained ill from 16-11-87 to 29-12-87:

10. It has been pleaded on behalf of the management in their written statement that the workman remained absent from duty without intimation from 23- 3-87 to 30-3-87 , 29-4-87 to 3-8-87 and thereafter remained absent from duty from 12-11-87 and abandoned the service. The onus of proving the above rests on the managment. Shri R.K. Kashiv , management's witness No. 1deposed on oath that the workman remaineed absent from duty from 22-3-87 to 30-3-87, 20-4-87 to 3-8-87 and therafter remained permanently absent from 12-11-87 . Daulat Warfe , management's witness No. 2 deposed that the workman remained absent from duty from 23rd Februry to 30 March , 29th April to 4th August , 13th October to 27th October and remained permanently absent from duty from 13th November, 87. The statement ofthis witness is contrary to the pleadings of the management . The above statement of the two witnesses are contradictory to each other . The management for proving unauthorised absence of workman from duty has filed photostat copies of muster rolls for the month of February to March 87, March to April 87 and so on up to November to December 87. These photostat copies of muster rolls have not been proved in accordance with law. None of the management's witnesses stated that those photostat copies are the true copies of the original Muster rolls. Both the management's witnesses deposed that the photostat copies of the Muster rolls do not bear initials or signatures of any responsible officer or official of the department . It is apparent from the perusal of photostat copies of muster rolls that they bear cuttings and over writings , uninitialled by any officer or official of the department . These photostat copies of the muster rolls cannot be placed reliance upon and have not been proved according to law. Thus the case of the management that the workman was habitual of remaining absent from duty is not at all proved .

11. It is fully established from the statement of workman Mangoo Singh made in his rejoinder affidavit, receipt of registered post , three acknowledgement cards and copy of notice dated 15-8-88 bearing signature of workman that he had served authorities with notice dated 15-8-88 by registered AD post . There is no evidence on record to indicate that the said notice was replied by the management. By the aforesaid notice , the workman had. prayed that the oral order dated 29-12-87 of his termination be treated as null and void and he be re- instated in service with all back wages and benefits . Under the above circumstances , it cannot be held that the workman deliberately abandoned his service .

12. Shri D.N. Dixit , my learned predecessor in office held in Award dated 6-8-99 that the reference is barred by principle of limitation. It is to be noted here that the management has not taken any such plea in its written statement . It has been held in 1999 - LLR-529 in the case of Ajaib Singh versus the Sirhind Co -operative Marketing- Cum- Processing Service Society Ltd. and 2339 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

another that provisions of Article 137 of the Limitation Act are not applicable to the proceedings under the I.D. Act, 1947. Therefore the reference is not barred by the provisions of law of limitation.

refused to join duty, no enquiry was conducted against him to prove the charge of misconduct , no notice was served on him calling upon him to resume duty and his name was struck off from the muster- roll . After having considered the facts and circumstances of this case very carefully I'am of the considered view that the order dated 29-12-87 of terminating the services of the workman is not legal and is void -ab-initio .

14. In the result, the reference is answered as follows:

"The action of the management of Divisional Electrical Engineer, Construction Power , Western Railway, Ratlam in terminating the services of Shri Mangoo Singh , S/ o Shri Chen Singh . Ex . Khalasi without any chargesheet or enquiry is not justified and he is entitled to the relief of being re- instated in service with all backwages and benefits . "

15. The reference is allowed in favour of applicant and against the non -applicant with costs and the oral dated 29-12-87 of terminating the service of workman Mangoo Singh is set - aside . He shall be re - instated with all back wages and benefits attached to his post . He shall be deemed to be in continuous service from the date of termination till date i.e. the date of reinstatement. He shall be paid all back wages and other consequential benefits by the management as if he was not dismissed from the service.

16. The copy of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules . C.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 867.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्थ मालावार ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कोजीकोडे, केरल राज्य के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या ( सी ) 1/01 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011/31/ 2000- आई. आर. ( बी-I ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005

S.O. 867. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award [Ref. No. (C) 1/01) of the Labour Court , Kozhikode, Kerala State as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of North Malabar Gramin Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-02-2005.

13. Let it be assumed only for the sake of argument that there was unauthorised intermittent absence from duty by the workman . In that case, what was obligatory on the part ofthe management . It has been held by the Honorable Supreme Court of India in 1982 ( 1 ) All India Services Law Journal 319 that the absence without leave constitutes misconduct and it is not open to the employer to terminate service without notice and enquiry or at any rate without complying the minimum principle of natural justice. It has also been held therein that further rule 2302 of Railway Establishment Manual clearly prescribes the mode , manner and methodology terminating the services oftemporaryRailway Servant . Let it be also assumed only for the sake of argument that the workman abandoned the service in that case too , it was obligatory on the part of the management to give notice to him calling upon him to resume duty and also to hold enquiry before termination of service . My above view finds support in 1989 Administrative Tribunal cases 158 in the case ofG. Krishnamurthy versus Union of India and others . It is not in the pleadings of the management that any notice was given to the workman, but during the evidence R.K. Kashiv management's witness No. 1 deposed that during the year 1987 ,1987, he was posted as Sr. Section Engineer at Ratlam and he had informed on the notice board to the workman to resume duty immediately. But this witness on being cross -examined, failed to disclose if any such notice was sent to the workman by registered post. Daulat Warfe management's witness No. 2 during evidence of his cross examination deposed that it was informed on notice board that the name workman was struck off from muster - roll . The workman in his rejoinder affidavit has stated on oath that the managment did not serve any notice on him before or after refusing him to resume duty. Thus it is fully established that the management did not serve any notice on the workman , did not make any enquiry regarding misconduct and only orally terminated his services . In this respect , the learned counsel for the workman submitted that the workman had acquired the status of a temporary employee, his service could not be legally terminated by oral order and by striking off his name from the muster roll in violation of the mandatory provisions contained in Sec 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 and therefore the oral order dated 29-12-87 of termination of service of workman is invalid . He submitted thatwithout giving him notice contemplated under Sec- 25 -F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, the oral order dated 29-12-87 of termination of his service is void -ab- initio. In this respect , the learned counsel for the workman placed reliance on 1985(4) Supreme Court cases 201 in case of H.D. Singh versus Reserve Bank of India and others . I have very carefully gone through the law cited above . In the case at hand , the workman was granted status of temporary employee . No notice as contemplated in the provisions of Sec - 25 -F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was served on him by the management and orally he was

[No. L- 12011/31 /2000 - IR (B - I) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

565 G1/05-44 2340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14. 1926

ANNEXURE

IN THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE , KERALA STATE

Dated, this the 5th day of January , 2005 Present :

Shri K. Balasubramanian , B. Com .. LL.B ..

Presiding Officer

1.D. No. (C) 1/01

Between :

The Chairman , North Malabar Gramin Bank . Head Office , P.B. No. 59. Bank Road. Kannur - 670 001. Kerala .

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] from 1-12-1997 onwards . Various representations made by the union to regularise these administrator messengers were not headed with any positive response from the side of the management . So the Union prays for regularisation of the services of the 9 workers referred to in the annexure from the respective dates of their appointment .

.Management

And

The General Secretary. North Malabar Gramin Bank Employees , Union . T.V. 187 , Labba Street . Fort Road , Kannur. I

Union Representations :

Sri M Asokan . Advocate , Calicut .

ForManagement

Sri P.S. Murali . Advocate . Calicut : ForUnion

AWARD

1 1 his reference was made by the Government of India . Ministry of Labour as per Order No. L - 12011/31/ 2000/ IR ( B - 1 ) dated 29-12-2000 u/ s. 10 of the I.D. Actto adjudicate whether the services of 9 temporary messengers working in the management - North Malabar Gramin Bank is liable to be regularised or not ? If not what benefit the messengers are entitled ?

2. In pursuance of the notices issued from this Court both parties appeared through counsel of their choice and filed their respective statements .

3. The case of the Union representing the workers is that sweeping , cleaning and incidental works in the various branches and Head Office of the management Bank were done by part - time messengers who were subsequently regularised. While so certain vacancies arose in certain branches of the Bank by way of transfer and death of part time messengers as well as by the opening of new branches . In such vacancies management started appointing temporary messengers for contract period with an obvious motive to deny them of the various service benefits payable to the permanent messengers . They were allowed to continue in employ ment by renewing the period of contract on the expiry of every 90 days . Even though for all practical purposes these temporary messengers are liable to be treated as permanent employees , they are not given all the benefits of permanent part - time messengers which is just and illegal . The persons referred to in the annexure are 9 such temporary messengers entitled for regularisation. They are doing the works similar to those done by the permanent part- time messengers continuously 4. According to the management , the appointment and service conditions of the employees of the Bank are covered by the provisions of the Regional Rural Banks Act 1976. The Bank is bound by the orders , directions and circulars issued by the Central Government and also by the NABARD . In the matter of appointment , promotion etc .. the Bank is bound to follow the directions issued by the above mentioned authorities . NABARD is also prohibited to make any addition to the existing staff stength without the specific approval of Government of India . In view of the above taboo it is idle for the Union to make any claim for regularisation . The workers were given appointment for limited periods considering the existence of vacancies . There was no ill motive in getting the contract period renewed . The service conditions are governed by the terms of contract . There is no permanent vacancy of messengers in the Bank and at any rate the workers involved in the dispute are not liable to be posted without the concurrence of NABARD and Central Government . Worker No. 9 in the order of reference was not engaged by refusing to renew his contract on account of serious misconduct committed by him . Therefore , management prays to pass an Award that workers are not liable to be regularised and absorbed in permanent vacancies .

5. The evidence consists of oral evidence of one of the workers who was examined as WWI and Ext . WI series on the side to the worker and Ext.MI on the management side . The point for determination is :

( 1) Whether the services of 9 temporary messengers shown in the annexure are liable to be regularised or not ? If not what benefit they are entitled to ?

6. The General Secretary of the union while examined as WW1 and worker No. 1 as WW2 have deposed about the extent and nature of works discharged by 9 casual wokers and their eligibility for regularisation . They have also given evidence that the 9 persons indicated in the reference were working in sanctioned posts and their works are perennial in nature and indispensible for carrying on the functioning of the Bank. Exts . WI scries and W2 series are the contract of employment containing the service conditions and details of appointment in relation to worker Nos . I and 7 in the annexure . It could be seen that these workers were appointed for a period of 90 days and their contracts were being renewed according to the exigencies of work .

7. It is in evidence that the management - Bank is a Scheduled Bank functioning under the provisions of the Regional Rural Banks Act 1976 and the Bank is bound by the directions and circulars issued by the Central Government and also by NABARD from time to time .

יין 2341 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

APPENDIX

Witnesses examined on the side of the Workman :

WWI

: Sudhakaran P.O.

WW2

: Rameshan K.V.

Witnesses examined from the side of the Management : Nil

Documents marked from the side of the Workman :

Ext. WI : Series .

Ext . WI ( a) : Appointment order given to Rameshan dtd . 28-10-1997 .

Ext. W1 (b ) : Appointment order given to Rameshan dtd . 15-11-1997 .

though WWI has a case that the directions of NABARD are not binding on the Banks in the matter of the appointments. Ext . W1 makes it abundantly clear that the appointment was purely temporary and do not entitle the candidate for regularisation or for any perferential treatment on that ground . That is further evident from the circular issued from the Head Office wherein it is stated that the engagement will automatically come to an end oncompleting the period of temporary arrangement . Ther is also nothing to show that the workers under reference were working in substantive vacancies or were appointment in accordance with the provisions of any status or Rules . In view of the terms and conditions enunciated in the service contracts there is no charm in the contention of the workers that they have a right for regularisation . Perhaps , the management in its wisdom might have thought of employing workman on contract basis for their own reasons .

Ext . W1 (c) Appointment order given to Rameshan dtd. 14-2-1998.

Ext. W1 ( d) Appointment order given to Rameshan dtd. 21-5-1998.

Ext. WI ( e ) : Appointment order given to Rameshan dtd . 30-5-1998 .998

Ext . W1 ( f) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 14-2-1998 .

Ext. WI ( g) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd. 14-2-1998 .

Ext. W1 ( h ) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 21-5-1998 .

Ext . WI ( i ) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 30-5-1998.

Ext. W1 (j ) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 28-8-1998 .

Ext. W1 (k) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 28-10-1998 .

Ext. WI (1 ) Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 3-2-1999.

Ext. W1 ( m) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd. 2-8-1999 .

Ext. W1 (n) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 29-10-1999 .

8. Some observations of the National Industrial Tribunal emphasising the need for regularisation of part- time sweepers - cum- messengers was highlighted by the learned counsel for the workers in support of their claim. Butafter considering the effect and binding natural of these observations the Honorable Apex Court has held in AIR 2001 SC 1028 that the Award of the National Tribunal could be made effective only with the nod of the Central Government . So the Bank is bound to follow the directons issued by the NABARD and Cental Government in the matter of appointments . Even in the case of exigincies the appointments can be done by the management Bank functioning under the Regional Rural Banks Act only with the sanction and approval of the Central Government and by enhancing the staff strength which is prohibited by NABARD . It was also pointed out that as per another circular referred to in page 2 of the reply statement of the management that further recruitments even for filling up of vacancies arising out of natural wastages as a general measure except on compassionate grounds are prohibited. Moreover , regularisation cannot be made as a rule of 'thumb ' on the basis of completion of years of service . It depends onvarious factors which have not been established in the present case . So , on an adequate consideration of the facts and circumstances emerged , I hold that the union has not succeeded in establishing the eligibility of 9 temporary messengers for regularisation .

Ext . W1 ( o) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd. 29-1-2000 .

Ext. W1 ( p ) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd. 29-4-2000 .

9. In the result , an Award is passed holding that the service of 9 temporary messengers covered by the reference is not liable to be regularised and consequently they are not entitled for any further relief.

Ext. W1 ( q) Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 29-7-2000 .

Ext . WI ( r ) : Appointment order given to Rajno did. 28-10-2000.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant , transcribed by her, revised , corrected and passed by me on the 5th day of January 2005 .

K. BALASUBRAMANIAN, Presiding Officer

Ext . WI ( s) : Appointment order given to Rajinchard 3-2-2001 2342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

2-5-2001 . Ext . W1 (t ) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd.

Ext. Wl ( u) : Appointment order given to Rajmohandtd. 1-11-2001 .

Ext. WI ( v) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 31-1-2002.

Ext. W1 (w) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 2-5-2002.

Ext. W1 (x) : Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 30-4-2003 .

Ext...W1 (y) : Appointment order given to Rajmohandtd. 28-7-2003 .

Ext . WI ( z) Appointment order given to Rajmohan dtd . 27-10-2003 .

Documents marked from the side of the Management :

Ext. M1 : True attested photostat copy of letter dtd. 14-2-1998 sent by the management to the worker K.V. Rameshan as temporary appointment messenger.

Ext. M2 : Letter dated 15-11-1997 sent by the management to the worker K. V. Rameshan as temporary appointment messenger.

Ext. M3 : NABARD Circular " N.N.B. IDD RR.CBD No. 4 " 2753/337/93-94 dtd . 22-12-1993 .

Ext. M4 : NABARD Circular N.NB IDD.RR.CBD/ 1736/ C- 316 ( Gen )/98-99 dtd. 19-9-1998 .

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 868.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार साउथ मालाबार ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कोजी कोडे , केरल राज्य के पंचाट [संदर्भ संख्या ( सी ) 9/99 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011/ 26/99- आई. आर. ( बी- I ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 868. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award [ Ref. No. ( C) 9/99 ] of the Labour Court , Kozhikode , Kerala State as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of South Malabar Gramin Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-02-2005 .

[ No. L - 12011 / 26/99 - IR (B - I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

IN THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE , KERALA STATE

Dated this the 6th day of January, 2005 PRESENT :

Shri K. Balasubramanian , B.Com . , LL.B. , Presiding Officer

I.D. ( C) 9/99

BETWEEN :

The Chairman ,

South Malabar Gramin Bank , P.B. No. 10 , Head Office ,

Management Malappuram-676505

AND

The Convenor,

Co-ordination Committee ,

South Malabar Gramin Bank ,

Staff Association and

Union Officer Congress , Atholi -673315

REPRESENTATIONS :

Sri N. Ramakrishnan ,

Advocate , Calicut

... For Management Sri Sreekanth S. Nair ,

... For Union

Advocate , Calicut

AWARD

The claim of 158 workers for regularisation in the service of the management - South Malabar Gramin Bank is the subject matter of reference . The dispute was referred to this Court as per order No. L- 12011 / 26 / 99 / IR ( B - I ) dated 28-10-1999 .

2. In pursuance of the notice issued from this Court , both parties appeared and filed their respective statements . The gist of the statement filed by the Union representing the workers involved in the dispute is stated as follows:-

Management Bank is a Scheduled Bank sponsored by Canara Bank having 172 branches spread all over Malabar . The Bank initially used to employ sweepers on contract basis upto 31-12-1998 . Thereafter these sweepers were directed to work without any contract as directed by the Bank . Even though they were termed as part -time sweepers . after the termination of contract labour in 1988 , no specific hours of work was stipulated for their work and they were made to work for the entire working hours of the Bank. Apart from the work of sweeping they were also made to attend other jobs including that of peons , canteen attendants and domestic servants . They were given bonus and other service benefits for different years and in all respect treated as regular employees . In spite of this , they were only paid meagre amount of wages. The persons involved in the dispute were working as sweepers in the [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Bank for more than 10 to 20 years without any interruption . The management , inspite of repeated requests has not taken any action for regularisation of their services . The action of the management is not justifiable . The services of these employees are indispensible for the normal functioning of the Bank . In these circumstances , the Union prays for regularisation of service of 158 workers involved in the dispute in the management Bank .

3. According to the management the workers under reference were engaged for sweeping works on contract basis /floor area basis and paid them through contingencies . They do not form personnel of RRB. Usually persons attending the works of sweeping will only have half an hour work in working days . There is no post of part -time sweeper under the management . So the persons involved in the dispute do not acquire any right for regularisation.

4. Evidence on the side of the Union consists of the oral evidence of WW1 and WW2 and Ext . W1 , whereas that on the side of the management , MW1 and Exts . M1 to M4:

5. On the basis of rival pleadings and evidence the following points emerge for consideration :-

Whether the 158 persons involved in the dispute under reference are eligible for regularisation in the service of the management ? If so , further relief liable to be granted ?

6. Points : The office bearer of the Union and one ofthe workers involved in the dispute while examined as WW1 and WW2 have given evidence about the length of service of the workers and the nature and extend of work undertaken by them. According to these witnesses the works start by 9 A.M. in the morning . They have to often remain till the Banks are closed and in the meanwhile apart from sweeping works they have to attend cleaning works , messenger duties , canteen duties , bringing water and even that of the peons . Ext . W1 is the copy of the minutes of the discussions held before the ALC (Central Ernakulam) between the representation of staff association and the management . As per Ext . W1 , the management is seen to have agreed to absorb the casual sweepers as part - time sweepers . As against this evidence a Senior Manager of the management Bank has given evidence that the work of part - time sweepers will extend only to half an hour a day. According to him payment is made on the basis of floor area cleaned by them . The witness denied the engagement of these persons to attend extra works and according to him there is no such post of sweepers in the Bank . Ext. MI is the copy of Office circular issued by the management Bank permitting the branches to engage labourers for cleaning the premises and bringing water to the premises . Remuneration for the work is also seen fixed as per the circular based on the carpet area of the respective branches . Ext. M2 is a revised wage circular, Ext. M3 is an intimation regarding the decision to enroll sweepers to EPF and Ext . M4 is an office order declaring 8.33% of the salary / wages as bonus to the eligible

2343

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

employees . The eligibility criteria is also mentioned in Ext. M4.

7. According to the Union the workers were initially employed as sweepers on contract basis and thereafter they were working without any contract . They now claim to be the part-time sweepers . The claim of the union that the workers involved in the dispute were attending sweeping works for a considerable length of period is not seendisputed by the management . But as pointed out by the learned counsel for the management , the word ' part- time' implies that there is no prohibition for the workers to have employment in more than one place outside ' part- time' employment and earn money. It is not an exclusive employment under one employment. Literally the works begin in the morning and ends by the time they finish the work for that day. So their service could not be considered as continuous employment under one employment even in the absence of any evidence to show that they were working under any other employment during their period in question . That apart , MW1 has given evidence that there is no sanctioned post of sweepers and there is no evidence to the contrary. So , a direction for regularisation if given without reference to the existence of vacancies , every temporary employee or ad hoc employee who has been working in the Banks will have to be regularised despite the non -availability of any vacancy and irrespective oftheir eligibility for the post . Based on Ext . W1 circular, the learned counsel on behalf of the Union contended that the duties of sweepers which is perennial in nature is and indispensible for the functioning of the Bank and the can't now back out from their promise given in Ext . W1 .

8. Ext . W1 was entered in to resolve an ongoing agitation . The undertaking given in Ext . W1 by the management to take casual sweepers as part -time sweepers is subject to the statutory nod of NABARD through SLCC which were in the final stages . There is nothing to show that the workers involved in the dispute were parties to Ext. W1 . The reference is also not based on Ext . W1 . The question of regularisation may arise only in two contingencies, firstly, on the availability of vacancies having a long duration where the workers were working on adhoc basis or daily wage basis appointed by a competent authority and continued from time to time and their services are otherwise required by the institution. The second type of situation is when the initial entry of the employee against the available vacancies is found to have suffered some flaw in the procedural exercise though the initial recruitment was lawful. But both these contingencies require one pre-condition that the initial entry of such an employee must be made against available sanctioned vacancy by following the rules and regulations governing such entry which has not been done in the case in hand .

9. The sweeping and cleaning works may be indispensible for carrying on the smooth running of the establishment . The workers involved may be attending sweeping works for a considerable length of period . But the mere fact that they have continued for a considerable length of time may be a moral consideration but not a 2344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

legal consideration to entitle them for regularisation nor they acquire any right for permanency. Such a direction ifgiven, would amount to requisition of creation of posts though not required by the employer .

10. In the result , an award is passed holding that the workers involved in the dispute are not entitled for regularisation in the service of the management .

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, revised, corrected and passed by me on the 6th day of January, 2005 .

K. BALASUBRAMANIAN , Presiding Officer APPENDIX

Witnesses examined on the side of the Worker :-

WW1

Rajeev. K.

WW2 Sarasa . C.P.

Witnesses examined on the side of the Management :---

MWI

Jayaprakasan , A. P.

Documents marked on the side of the Workman :-

Ext. WI Photostat copy of the minutes of discussion held before the Asst . Labour Commissioner (Central ) Ernakulam on 3-11-90 over dispute dtd. 10-6-90 and agitation notice dated 10-9-1990 of South Malabar Gramin Bank Association .

Documents marked on the side of the management :-

Ext. M1 Memo No. 65/89-90 dtd . 25-11-1990 of the Industrial Relations Cell of the Management on the subject of sweepting charges.

Ext. M2 Memo No. 74/98 dated 24-12-1998 of the Personal Administration Department of the Management .

Ext . M3 Circular No. 85/97 dated 1-7-1997 of the Personnel Administration Department of the Management .

Ext. M4 Memo No. 10 /91-92 dated 20-6-1991 of the Management .

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 869.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 100/ 2004) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/46/2004-आई . आर. ( बी-1 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 869. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 100/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Governinent on 14-02-2005.

[No. L - 12012/46/ 2004 - IR (B - I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. ISMAIL , B. Sc . , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated the 25th day of November , 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 100/2004 BETWEEN

The President ,

State Bank Employees Union ,

Petitioner Central Bank Building , 2nd floor, Karl Marx Road, Vijayawada.

AND

The Asst . General Manager,

State Bank of India .

Respondent Zonal Office , No. 29-14-59 , Route No. 5 Road , Surya Rao Pet . Vijayawada

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : Nil

For the Respondent : M/ s. B. G. Ravindra Reddy, B. V. Chandra Sekhar & P. Srinivasulu , Advocates AWARD

The Government of India . Ministry of Labour by its order No. L - 12012 /46/2004 - IR ( BI ) dated 23-7-2004 referred the following dispute under section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of State Bank of India and their workman . The reference is .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India , Vijayawada Zone in withholding two increments in the time scale pay of Sh . N. Phanibhushanachari , Head Assistant is justified ? If not , what relief the employee is entitled for ? " [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2345

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 100/2004 and notices were issued to the parties .

2. Inspite of several adjournments given from 11-10-2004 for filing of claim statement and documents for four adjournments including 25-11-2004 the petitioner has not turned- out with claim statement and documents . Petitioner is not evincing any interest . There is nothing on record to support the contention of the Petitioner. Hence , a ' Nil ' Award is passed , Transmit.

Dictated to Sri J. Vijaya Sarathi , LDC transcribed by him corrected and pronounced by me on this the 25th day ofNovember , 2004.

E. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 870.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय- II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 30/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-12012/228/94- आई. आर. ( बी- I ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 870.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 30/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court- II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 14-02-2005 .

[No. L - 12012/228/94 - IR (B - I )] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer.

I.D. No. 30/96

IN THE MATTER OF :-

Sh . Mahender Kumar , House No. 164 -C, JaipuriaMills, Subzimandi , Clock Tower, Delhi.

Versus

General Manager , StateBank ofBikaner and Jaipur, Head Office , Tilak Marg , Jaipur-01

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/ 228/94 IR (B - I) Central Governmentdt. 26-3-1996 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :--

"Whether the action of the management of SBBJ in terminating the service of Sh . Mahender Kumar , temporary peon w.e.f. 19-2-88 is fair and justified ? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to" ?

That the claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman concerned was initially appointed as a peon on temporary basis at Bara Hindu Rao , Delhi Branch of State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur w.e.f. 5-11-84 as per the letter of appointment dated 5-11-84 copy of which is being attached and marked annexure W/ 1 hereto . That before appointing the workman, the workman was interviewed by the Bank and his eligibility and suitability for the post of peon was also duly judged and verified by the bank .

That though the post/vacancy in which the workman was appointed from 5-11-84 was permanent and he was working quite satisfactorily therein, but the management instead of continuing the workman in the said permanent post/vacancy of peon at Bara Hindu Rao , Delhi Branch , terminated his services on 23-1-85 , telling him that he hadbeen appointed only for a limited period as per bank's policy for not giving employment to one person for more than 80 days .

That after termination of services of the workman from 23-1-85 , the management continued to give employment to other persons at the same branch and at other branches of the bank also in Delhi , without offering 2346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] such further employment to the workman . That it was only after a gap of nearly three years that the workman was given appointment w.e.f. 12-11-87 at the same Bara Hindu Rao , Delhi Branch , but again as a temporary peon for only 30 days , which was continued by extending the same from time to time till 19-2-88 , when his services were again terminated after the workman had worked quite satisfactorily even though post/vacancy in which he was appointed and was working was a permanent one .

The only reason for termination of services of the workman on both the occasions i.c. from 23-1-85 and from 1,9-2-88 being that it was done in pursuance of management policy not to allow any one person to work for more than a fixed / limited period of 80 to 100 days at a time . Termination of services of the workman on both the occasions i.e.from 23-1-85 and from 19-2-88 stood vitiated and was illegal also for the reason of being violative of Section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act inasmuch as that while terminating the services of the workman , persons who entered the service of the bank initially after the appointment of the workman were retained and continued in service of the bank.

Thatafter terminating the services of the workman from 19-2-88 , the management again continued to give employment to other persons including new hands and/ or these whose initial dated of appointment were after the initial date of appointment of the workman , these appointments were given to such other persons both at Bara Hindu Rao , Delhi Branch and other branches of the bank in Delhi without offering the same to the workman.

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been stated that it is submitted that no letter of permanent appointment was ever issued by the bank to the workman . The workman was appointed for a fixed period against temporary vacancy. It is hereby explained that the interview is taken only by the bank manager and not by a recruitment board of the bank as in the case of permanent staff.

The post was purely temporary and he was appointed for a fixed period and therefore his services were terminated as per the terms of the memorandum dated 5-11-84 . It is wrong that his services were terminated according to some policy. The workman has no right to dictate his terms to the management . The bank has its own right and uses it's own discretion, as to appoint a person to a job on the merits of his qualifications , for a particularjob .

That while the workman did not receive any information or intimation from the bank for his re- employment/ absorption after 19-2-88 , he came to know subsequently from other sources that the bank was going to invite applications from all persons who had worked as temporary peons in bank in the post for considering them for absorption in regular service and the workman then submitted an application for the above purpose through Bara Hindu Rao , Delhi Branch , however, the management never informed the workman about the fate ofhis application nor conveyed to him the reason , if any, for non -consideration of his case for absorption in regular services , although the workman was fully eligible for such absorption, the workman subsequently came to know that many of the ex - temporary peons whose initial dates of temporary appointment fell after the initial dates of the appointment of the workman and who were similarly situated as the workman were absorbed in service and given appointments as regular peons at one or the other branch of the bank in Delhi .

The bank has no authority to appoint a person on permanent post unless the posts are approved by the Govt . for that the bank advertised in the leading papers that interested temporary/ ex - temporary employs can submit their applications . The applications were to be submitted latest by and by (twise) . The workman in question never applied against these vacancies . The bank has no authority or power under the law to fill permanent posts without advertisements and due procedure . In making such type of decisions not only there will be an utter indiscipline and nepotisnı , but also will be contrary to the law andto the provisions of the Indian constitution .

That the management did not publish the panel or list of the persons who had been selected for absorption in service ard the workman was kept completely in dark as to the criteria adopted by the management for such absorption and also as to why the persons junior to him as temporary peons were given preference over him in such absorption in regular service.

The post/vacancy of peon in which the workman was appointed at Bara Hindu Rao , Delhi from 5-11-84 being permanent, the action of management in employing and treating him as a temporary and in terminating his services from 23-1-85 after the workman had satisfactorily worked for more than 2½ months was illegal and unjustified.

It is submitted that no temporary employee was regularised or appointed as a permanent employ in the manner as stated by the workman in question in the petition . It is true that the advertisements were published in the leading newspapers but it is denied that the workman has submitted any application against these to the bank or its Bara Hindu Rao Branch . No receipt to this effect has been filed by the workman . It is correct that the temporary/ex - temporary employs were selected in the permanent posts , who had applied for the said post against the notice of inviting applications as stated above . No person who did not apply for such posts under permanent vacancies were appointed .

Itiswrong that the workman was appointed at the Bara Hindu Rao Branch from 5-11-84 as a permanent staff. The appointment was a temporary one which cannot The workman was given re - employment at Bara Hindu Rao Branch , after a gap of nearly three years , from 12-11-87 but the management again acted illegally in employing and treating the workman as a temporary in spite of the post/vacancy in which he was appointed being permanent.

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

be converted into a permanent one . The workman never applied against the permanent vacancy advertised by the bank in 1987 and 1990 hence he cannot agitate his inaction in these proceedings .

The services to the workman were never terminated by the management , since the post was for a limited and fixed period dully mentioned in the memorandum and informed at the time of appointment . There is no question of termination of services of the workman and hence is not entitled for the relief claimed in the petition. There was justification in issuing the memorandum since the contents of the same have never been disputed or objected to by the workman .

Inthe present case the question is not of terminating ofservice, but of providing permanent post for providing a permanent post a procedure is laid down by the Finance Ministry, Government of India and the same is followed by the bank . The bank is a public institution and no personal interest are involved on taking the claimant on temporary post and when the bank had given a chance the workman failed to apply for the permanentjob against the advertised vacancy. It is not denied that the workman was fully eligible for the post of peon but he never applied for the same when the application forms were invited by the bank .

The workman never remained in continuous service as defined under sec . 25B and therefore he cannot be said to be retrenched by the management and hence is not entitled for any retrenchment benefits . There was no unfair practice.

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In his rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most of the paras of claim statement . Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard arguments and perused the papers on the record.

It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that he was taken into service w.e.f. 05-11-84 as per the letter of appointment dated 5-11-84 . His work was satisfactory . He was appointed against permanent vacancy but his services were illegally & arbitrarily terminated on 23-01-85 . He was told that he has been appointed only for a short period.

After a gap of nearly three years the workman applicant was given appointment w.e.f. 12-11-87 for 30 days. Thereafter his services were terminated when the period of his appointment expired as such the workman applicant was posted two times . Once in 1984 and next in 1987 but in both the postings he has worked only for two months . It was further submitted by the workman applicant that he was appointed against permanent post but his services were terminated illegally. He should be regularised under Section 25 G of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 .

It was submitted from the side of the management that the appointment was given on temporary basis due 565 61/05-45

2347

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

to the increase of the work for a fixed period . When there was additional work he was given appointment from 05-11-84 to 23-01-85 and when the work was over his services were dispensed with . Similarly when there was additional work he was appointed from 12-11-87 to 19-2-88 and his services automatically came to an end on the expiry of specified period in the appointment letter .

It was submitted from the side of the management that the post were advertised in the newspaper as well as in the Head Office twice and the workman who have workedtemporarily was asked to apply as a panel was to be preparedbut this workman did not apply. The workman has asserted in his evidence that he applied for the post but his name was not included in the panel . The workman applicant in his cross - examination has admitted that he did not come to know of the advertisement as such it is wrong that he has applied for the post when there was advertisement . He has also stated that he was doing agricultural work so he did not come to know of the advertisement, as he did not read newspaper. The advertisement has been published on 31st July 1987. It has been published in the newspaper . The cutting of the newspaper is enclosed with the record . It indicates that there was wide advertisement but the workman applicant did not apply as he did not come to know of the advertisement as such opportunity was over and nothing was concealed while advertising for preparing panel . It was published in the Hindustan Times on 6/7-1-1987 as such it was published on two dates so it cannot be said that the management did not advertise the post when the panel was prepared. The workman applicant has been taken into service for a fixed period not exceeding 2-3 months on two different occasions . There is no retrenchment but he stopped his work when specified period was over. He should have appeared according to the advertisement but he did not apply and he has filed this ID case after a very long time in 1996 whereas for the last time he worked up to 18-2-88 . He has filed this ID case after eight years .

From the side of the workman applicant my attention was drawn to 1990 I LLJ Pg . 445, 1990 I LLJ Pg. 443 , 1991 , 1999 ILB 909. I have perused the citation thoroughly but the citations are not applicable in the present facts and circumstances of the case . The workman applicant has been given appointment due to increase of additional work for a specified period so Section 2 (00) of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 is not attracted . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The reference is replied thus :-

The action of the management of SBBJ in terminating the services of Shri Mahinder Kumar, temporary peon w.e.f. 19-02-88 is fair and justified . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The Award is given accordingly.

Date : 03-02-2005

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer 2348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005/ PHALGUNA 14, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 871.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टैंडर्ड चार्टर्ड बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 187/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/20/1997- आई. आर. ( बी- I ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 871. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 187/ 97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court - II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Standard Chartered Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-02-2005 .

[No. L- 12012/ 20/ 1997 - IR (B - I ) J C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR , RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer .

I.D. No. 187/97

IN THE MATTER OF :-

Sh . Mahaveer Budhera

S/ o Sh . Vasant Lal , R/ o 35/36 , Trilok Puri , Delhi .

Versus

The Sr. Manager (HR) Standard Chartered Bank, Allahabad Bank Building , 17 , Parliament Street , New Delhi - 110001 .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 12012/ 20/97 IR ( B - I) CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DT. 05-11- 1997 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as liereunder :

"Whether the action of the management of Standard Chartered Bank in terminating the services of Sla . Mahaveer Bhudera Sweeper/ Cleaner is just fair and legal ? If not , what relief the workman concerned is entitled to and from what date. "

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] The case was put up on 30th November 2004 in the Lok Adalat and the matter was persuaded. It was again put up on 7th January, 2005. The parties entered into compromise . A cheque of Rs . 90,000 was given to the workınan. Both the parties signed the compromise and the case was decided . Their remains no dispute between theparties .

The award is replied thus :- No dispute award is given.

Dt. 24-01-2005

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी, 2005

का. आ. 872.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार विशाखापत्तनम पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्यद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 157/ 2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[संख्या एल-34025/ 1/2005- आई. आर. ( बी. II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005

S.O. 872.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby puhlishes the award (Ref. No. 157 / 2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Visakhapatnam Port Trust and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-2-05.

[No. L - 34025/ 1/ 2005 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated , the 10th Day of January, 2005

Industrial Dispute L. C.L.D. No. 157/2002

BETWEEN :

Sri D. Mohan Rao ,

C/o B. Naga Raju ,

Petitioner D. No. 53-16-551 , Near M/ s . Automotive Manufacturers Limited, Maddilapalem , Visakhapatnam - 530022

AND

יין" 2349 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

1. The Chairman , The Visakhapatnam Port Trust , Visakhapatnam .

.... Respondents

2. The Chief Mechanical Engineer , Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam .

Visakhapatnam Port Trust in terminating the services of the workman who have submitted false Burma Repatriate Certificate is in accordance with the Regulation 10 of the VPE (Recruitment , Seniority and Promotions) Regulation 1964 and thus does not appear to be unjustified or mala fide. He has filed the present ID after more than 20 years challenging the termination. Hence , the petition may be dismissed.

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Petitioner : Sri N. Sanni Babu , Advocate

Forthe Respondent : M/ s . K. Srinivasa Murthy,

V. Umadevi & C. Vijaya Shekar Reddy, Advocates .

AWARD

4. The Petitioner examined himself as WW1 and deposed that he was appointed in 1980 and regularized. That he was removed on the basis that the Burma Repatriate Certificate filed by him is a bogus one. But he went to Collectorate and informed the office that it was genuine. One Mr. Govinda Rao was removed . He filed a case before the Industrial Tribunal , Hyderabad . The certificate issued by the RR Section in Collector's office was not produced that is why the case was dismissed. Hence , he is entitled for reinstatement and compensation ofRs . 2,00,000 . In the cross examination he deposed that he has not filed any document to show that he is a Burma Repatriate.

This is a case taken under Sec. 2A(2) of the I. D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgement of Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W. P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s. Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

2. The brief facts as averred in the petition are : That he was appointed as Khalasi in Mechanical section in the year 1976. During the year 1981 he was terminated without assigning and giving any proper reason for his termination. That he approached the Visakhapatnam Port Trust on several times and submitted several letters but to no avail . The Respondent Management has not settled the wages and Provident Fund balance . He is having a big family and he may be reinstated and grant of Rs . 2,00,000 towards compensation for his termination without any proper reason .

5. The Management examined Sri V. V. Satyanarayana as MW1 , who deposed the facts stated as stated in the counter. He deposed that Ex. Ml is the Burma Repatriate Certificate dated 13-6-73 . Ex. M2 is the letter ofDistrict employment exchange enclosing the list of candidates . The matter was referred to the Collector about the genuineness of the certificates which is Ex . M3 . Ex . M4 isthe reply letter stating that 19 are forged certificates . Ex. M5 is the termination letter. Ex . M6 is the extract of the regulation. Ex . M7 to M9 are the said replies to the representation of the Petitioner. That the Petitioner has againsubmitted another Burma Repatriate Certificate said to have been issued by Special Officer ( RR) Visakhapatnam vide letter dated 28-5-81 . The Respondent organization came to a conclusion that there is no justification to reopen the case on the basis of another Burma Repatriate Certificate . As the certificate initially submitted was certified to be forged one and the question ofconsidering him again arises only when the employment exchange again sponsors his name . Hence , he is not entitled for any relief. In the cross examination he deposed that Ex . M13 is the letter from the Collectorate dated 3-8-81 is stating that 7 persons out of 19 persons are genuine Burma Repatriates . Accordingly, 7 persons were reinstated . It is not true to suggest that the Petitioner is one of the 7 vide Ex. M13 and that they are purposely not producing Ex . M13 . Hence , the Petitioner is not entitled for any relief.

3. A counter was filed stating that the Petitioner was appointed as Khalasi on 18-7-80. He was sponsored by the employment exchange and the appointment was made under Burma Repatriate Quota . Subsequently he was regularized in the post of Khalasi w.e.f. 6-10-80 and was placed on probation for a period of two years. He never worked from 1976. He has been sponsored by the employment exchange under Burma Repatriate Quota in 1979: Upon appointment in order to ascertain the genuineness of the Burma Repatriate Certificate submitted by the 71 employees including Mr. D. Mohan Rao , the Petitioner . The matter was referred to the Special Officer (RR) Office of the Collectorate Visakhapatnam vide his letter dated 8-4-81 confirmed that out of 71 Burma Repatriate Certificate 19 are forged certificates . The certificate submitted by the Petitioner was not genuine and he was terminated on 21-4-81 . That in response to his representation dated 20-5-81 , 5-10-82 and 18-10-82 letters were sent to him on 6-6-81 , 9-10-82 and 12-11-82 . One such employee Mr. Govinda Rao , Khalasi ( Shore) whowas appointed in Burma Repatriate Quota and whose Burma Repatriate Certificate was found to be not genuine and who was discharged from Port service w.e.f. 21-4-81 has raised an ID No. 70/89 before the Industrial Tribunal , Hyderabad which passed an award on 8-2-93 in favour of the Management . The Government of India vide letter dated 22-10-81 has stated that the action of the

6. The Petitioner's Counsel argues that he was removed on 21-4-81 and only after his dismissal it was informed by the Collectorate on 3-8-81 that he is genuine repatriate . It is admitted by MW1 that they replied to the representations of the Petitioner on 3 occasions i.e. , on 6-6-81, 9-10-82 and 12-11-82 and therefore he submits that he has been making representations and replies were given to him and therefore he should have been taken back into service but he was not taken for so many years . Hence, for his mental torture and being out ofjob he should 565.G1/05-46 2350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

be given a compensation of Rs . 2.00.000 and reinstated with full back wages .

7. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondent that how could immediately the same officer change and say that he is a repatriate when earlier it was stated that he is not one of the repatriates and again his name ought to have been sponsored by the employment exchange and only then he would have been considered. He therefore submits that the Petitioner is not entitled for any relief and as he has approached the Hon'ble Court after a gap of 20 years the petition may be dismissed.

8. It may be noted that the Petitioner was sponsored by employment exchange as Burma Repatriate and he was given thejob under the said quota and he was removed in 1981 and immediately on 3-8-81 the same authority informed that he is one of the genuine candidates . His name was already sponsored by the employment exchange and he was already given a job when his dismissal was found to bewrong that he has submitted a bogus certificate. He should have been reinstated but he was not. He was corresponding till 1982 and then he kept quite . But the question is, what was he doing for 20 long years . Obviously he must have been gainfully employed somewhere else and no doubt, injustice has been done to him 20 years back but he thought of that injustice when any other avocation or job or business whatever he was doing came to an end and approached this Court by way of a chance litigation . Hence , he is not entitled for any back wages or any such relief but however , as his dismissal was wrong he shall be appointed as Khalasi within 30 days from the publication of this award on the minimum pay now applicable subject to his being found medically fit and giving relaxation in his age considering his age as on the date of the first date of appointment , failing which he will be entitled to monthly salary after 30 days of the publication of this award .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . K. Phani Gowri . Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 10th day of January, 2005 .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent WWI : Sri D. Mohan Rao MWI Sri V. V. Satyanarayana

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent Ex . MI Copy of certificate dt . 13-6-73

Ex. M2 Copy of Ir. No. CEO /609/ 21 dt . 4-10-79 Ex . M3 Copy ofIr. N. E/ J / 19540 dt . 29-12-80 Ex. M4 Copy of Ir . No. 4454/81 K. 4 dt . 8-4-81 Ex . M5 Copy of Ir . No. E/J /5066 dt . 22-4-81

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Ex. M6 Extract of Regulation 10 ( 2) of VPE's (RS & P ) Regulations 1964

Ex. M7 Copy of representation of WW1 dt . 20-5-81 Εχ . Μ8 Copy of representation of WW1 dt. 5-7-81 Copy of representation of WWi dt. 18-10-82 Ex . M9

Ex . M10 : Copy of statement of settlement of terminal benefits

Ex . M11 : Copy of notification dt . 26-3-93 of Mr. Govinda Rao

Ex. M12 Copy of endt. No. F /8652/ 81 , dt. 5-11-81 Ex . M13 Copy of Ir. No. 4454/81 K. 4 dt. 3-8-81 नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 873.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 42/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-2-05 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ संख्या एल-12012/16/2003- आई. आर. ( बी.- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 S.O. 873. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby puhlishes the award (Ref. No. 42/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Union Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 14-2-05 .

[No. L - 12012/ 16/2003 - IR (B - II ) ] -- C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy. ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated , the 27th Day of December, 2004 Industrial Dispute No. 42/2003

BETWEEN :

Sri K. Balanarasaiah ,

No. 2-3-645/ A/ 26 ,

Premnagar.

Hyderabad- 500013 .

Petitioner

AND

The Regional Manager,

Union Bank of India ,

Regional Office , Latha Complex,

Nampally. Hyderabad- 1.

Respondent [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

2351 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : Sri Dhonday Ram Mane , Advocate,

For the Respondent : M/ s . C. R. Sridharan, G. Narender Reddy, S. Ramesh , M. Srinivas Reddy & G. V. S. Ganesh, Advocates .

AWARD

That he absented unauthorisedly from 29-1-91 to 4-2-91 andfrom 18-2-91 to 23-3-91 . He was issued with charge sheet dated 6-5-91 . An Enquiry Officer was appointed and enquiry was conducted. The Petitioner requested time but he did not come. He is not attending duties since 26-6-91 . There are two minor charges also , two cheques returned due to insufficient funds , that one is for Rs . 3000 and the other is for Rs . 1500. He was again given a telegram is that enquiry will be conducted , but still he did not come for the enquiry. Two witnesses were examined, 18 documents were marked and he was dismissed . Previously he was unautohrisedly absent on several occasions and he was warned , censured , advised and his two increments were stopped. Hence , the reference may be ordered in negative.

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L - 12012/ 16/ 2003 - IR( B . II) dated 16-4-2003 referred the following dispute under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the employers in relation to the Management of Union Bank of India and their workman,

SCHEDULE

4. A memo was filed conceeding that the domestic enquiry is validly conducted. Hence , only question remains is whether the Petitioner is entitled for any relief under Sec . 11A or not.

"Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in dismissing from service of Shri K. Balanarasaiah w.e.f. 25-10-1991 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "

This reference was registered as Industrial Dispute No. 42/2003 and notices were issued to the parties .

5. Petitioner's Counsel argues that as there is no limitation under the Act and the very fact that the Government of India has thought it fit to refer the case means that an industrial dispute exists. He submits that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had decided in 2001-11 -LLJ page 788 in Sapan Kumar Pandit l's. U. P. State Electricity Board and others , where the Hon'ble High Court had quashed the reference stating that it is more than 15 years . It quashed it, but Hon'ble Supreme Court held . " Real test for deciding whether delay in making reference of industrial dispute material is existence or otherwise of dispute on date of reference To decide it Government can inter alia take into account subsistence of concliliation proceedings-On facts , held, dispute in this case remained alive on date of reference-Hence quashing by High Court , or reference made more than 15 years dispute arose , held notjustified". He also relied on 2003 ( 2 ) LLJ page 1143 of Hon'ble High Court of Orissa wherein it was held that , "Award of Labour Court not to be invalidated merely on ground of delay in raising dispute- Once Government makes reference , there is presumption that dispute exists " . In that case there was delay of 15 years . So he submits that merely because there is delay of 11 years , thedispute doesnot ceased to be a dispute . Hence , he may be reinstated with back wages .

2. The brief facts as averred in the claim statement are that the Petitioner joined the services of the Respondent bank on 1-10-75 as sub- staff. He has studied upto 7th class . He was transferred to Hyderabad in the year 1978. In 1983 he was promoted as cashier cum clerk and was deputed to Bangalore for three weeks . After his training he was transferred to work as clerk at Kortla Branch , Kareemnagar District from 1983 to 1986. In 1986 he was transferred to Hyderabad regional office and at the main branch , Siddambar Bazaar, Hyderabad . During 1988-89 he was posted to Laldarwaja , Hyderabad the Petitioner's wife was suffering from cancer and he has three minor children and events took a serious turn and the health of his aged father deteriorated much , just to multiply his various and anxieties and the Petitioner having lost his peace of mind and his wife died in January, 1989. Shortly his aged father also expired . In this circumstances he suffered a mild heart stroke . The motherless minor children shattered him . He was unable to attend his duties punctually. That a domestic enquiry was conducted . He was unable to attend to the domestic enquiry which was concluded exparte . He was dismissed from service w.e.f. 25-10-1991 . The Petitioner made several representations and ultimately approached the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C) on 19-8-2002. Thereafter a meeting was conveyed and a reference was made . Hence, the said dismissal order may be set aside and he may be taken into job .

3. A counter was filed by the Respondent . It is submitted that the order of reference is not valid and is liable to be rejected in limini by this Tribunal . The Petitioner has approached after 11 years . On this ground only reference is liable to be rejected at the threshold.

6. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that having slept for 11 years , having been dismissed in 1991 and during the enquiry also he did not attend the bank nor attended the enquiry and got up in 2002 and moved the case in the office of the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C ) on 19-8-2002 itself is a ground not to give him any relief . The Learned Counsel for the Respondent relied on 2000 II LLJ page 1653 Supreme Court cases wherein it was held that , " Workman raising dispute after 13 years without justification---Denial of relief held proper " . Their Lorsdships further observed. "In this case claim was made almost after a period of 13 years without reasonable or justifying ground and there was nothing on record to explain this delay as held by the Tribunal " .He also relied on 2000 (2 ) Supreme Court Cases 2352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for

the Petitioner

page455wherein their Lordships held, " inspite of absence of a statutory limitation period, such power cannot be exercised to revive settled matters or to refer stale disputes-When a dispute becomes stale , held, would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. In the instant case the workman was dismissed after lawfully and properly conducting the disciplinary proceedings , his dismissal was upheld in appeal and the benefits legally due to him were paid- Seven long years later he raised a dispute against his dimissal on the ground that two other employees dismissed in similar situation were reinstated- Reference of the said dispute at this stage , held, bad both on the grounds of delay as well as non - existence of an industrial dispute" . He also relied on many more cases . Hence , he submits that the Petitioner is not entitled to the relief prayed for.

7. It may be noted that domestic enquiry has been conceded as validly conducted by the Learned Counsel Petitioner . I have gone through the chargesheet where the charges are made against him which appear to be clear and the chargesheet was issued on 6-5-91 . He attended the enquiry on 10-7-91 and requested for 15 days adjournment . He did not attend the enquiry again which was adjourned to various dates and he has been continuously absent from 22-6-91 while the domiciles sword was hanging on his head and he did not attend the enquiry and a telegram was also given to him on 25-6-91 to report for duties . But he did not and he was dismissed on 25-10-91 and he kept quite till 19-8-2002 . No doubt , delay itself is not prejudicial if sufficient reason is given . No doubt in the petition he gives a grim picture of his wife's death in 1989 from cancer, then his father expired but that happened in 1989 and he was absent in 1991 , for which a chargesheet was issued . An enquiry was also held in 1991. He cannot say that for two years he was mourning. No dobut , one may mourn a lot on the death of one's wife or father or for life long , but it shall not effect one's duties . If that be the case , then no work in this world can be done and what explanation he has got that he continued mourning the death of his wife and father from 1991 to 19-8-2002 besides the absenteeism charges the other charges of dishonouring of cheques of Rs . 3000 and of Rs . 1500 without sufficient funds is not such a grave mistake . His absence also was not so bad , it was only for few days but he has absented himself again from 29-7-1991 till the enquiry was concluded and till he was dismissed. he did not attend . He is already aged about 50 years old heat in service for 16 years from 1-10-75 till 25-10-91 . ence , I am of the opinion that while confirming the order of dismissal , under the circumstances he may be given half month's wages for every year of service , that comes to 7½ months which is made into a round figure and the Respondent shall pay 8 months last drawn pay to him within 30 days after publication of this Award failing which he will be entitled to 6% p.a. interest on that amount after 30 days of publication of this award.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . K. Phani Gowri . Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 27th day of December , 2004 .

E. ISMAIL . Presiding Officer

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NII

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

J का. आ. 874.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स एस. जी. एस. इंडिया प्रा. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 76/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-02-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[संख्या एल-34012/2/2002- आई. आर. ( बी.- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005

S.O. 874. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 76/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s . SGS India Private Limited and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-2-2005 .

[ No. L - 34012 /2/ 2002-1R ( B - 11 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy. ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

r Shri E. Ismail . B.Sc .. LL.B. , Presiding Officer

Dated, the 6th Day of October , 2004

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 76/2004

BETWEEN :

Petitioner Sri Ch . Guru Mahesh , C/ o Palle Satyavathi , D. No. 22-81 - SC . Durjupeta. Visakhapatnam - 530001 .

AND

The Branch Manager. M/ s. SGS India Private Limited , D. No. 30-9-4/2 , Sarada Street , Dabagardens . Visakhapatnam - 530 024 .

Respondent 2353 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 5 , 2005/फाल्गुन 14, 1926

APPEARANCES :

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

ret

For the Petitioner : M/ s. S. Mohana Rao , S.

Raju , N. V. Ramana & Veera Srinu, Advocates.

For the Respondent : Sri Y. Venkata Rao, Advocate.

AWARD

का. आ. 875.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आन्ध्रा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 52/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[संख्या एल-12011/294/2003- आई. आर. ( बी . II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005 TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 34012/2 /2002 - IR(B. II) dated the 2-5-2003 referred the following dispute under section 10( 1) (d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the Management of M/ s. SGS India Private Limited and their workman . The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the termination of service of Shri Ch . Guru Mahesh Ex . Junior Inspector, by the Management of M/ s . SGS India Private Ltd. , Visakhapatnam is legal and justified ? If not, what relief is the workman is entitled to ? "

S.O. 875.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 52/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Andhra Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-2-2005.

This reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I. D. No. 76/2004 and notices were issued to the parties .

[ No. L - 12011 /294/ 2003 - IR (B -II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

2. The Petitioner filed this petition against his termination vide letter dated 16-4-2002 . A counter was also filed . While matters stood thus , the Petitioner filed a memo on 6-10-2004 requesting to withdraw the case as he is sick.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E, Ismail , B.Sc. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer Dated, the 9th Day of December, 2004

Industrial Dispute No. 52/2004

BETWEEN :

3. On 6-10-2004, Petitioner present , Sri P. V. S. N., Murthy. Jr. Inspector and General Secretary of M/s . SGS India Ltd. , Staff Association , Visakhapatnam present and identified the Petitioner who filed the memo dated 6-10-2004 , which was read over and explained to the Petitioner and he admitted the contents that he wants to withdraw the case . Accordingly a 'Nil` Award is passed . Transmit.

The Zonal Secretary,

Dictated to Sri P. Kanaka Raju , LDC transcribed by him corrected and pronounced by me on this the 6th day ofOctober , 2004.

Andhra Bank Award Employees Union, Visakhapatnam Zone , C/ o Andhra Bank , Seethammadhara Branch , Visakhapatnam - 530013 . Petitioner É. ISMAIL, Presiding Officer

AND

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

TheAsstt . General Manager, Andhra Bank , Zonal Office , Seethammadhara Branch , Visakhapatnam-530013 .

Respondent NIL

NIL

APPEARANCES :

Documents marked for the Petitioner

For the Petitioner :Nil

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

Forthe Respondent : M/ s . S. Udayachala Rao , S. Vikramaditya Babu & S. Kumar, Advocates . Mujib 2354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L - 12011 / 294/2003 - IR(B . II ) dated 22-3-2004 referred the following dispute under section 10(1) (d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the Management of Andhra Bank and their workmen . The reference is ,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the Andhra Bank Award Employees' Union , Visakhapatnam Zone for filling up the existing vacancies for the post of Computer Operators (CTOs) from the Category of Clerk- cum- Cashier anddefer the selection of the post of Joint Custodian Cashier ( JCC - Category 'E ' ) until such time by the Management of Andhra Bank, Zonal Office , Visakhapatnam is legal and justified ? If not , what relief the concerned union is entitled to ? " The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I. D. No. 52/2004 and notices were issued to the parties .

2. In spite of several adjournments given from for filing of claim statement and documents for 8 adjournments including 9-12-2004 the petitioner union has not turned out with claim statement and documents . The petitioner union continuously absent . There is nothing on record to support the case of the Petitioner union . Hence . Nil ' award is passed . Transmit.

Dictated to Sri P. Kanaka Raju . LDC transcribed by him corrected and pronounced by me on this the 9tlı day ofDecember. 2004 .

E. ISMAIL . Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner'

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2005

का. आ. 876.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-2-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ संख्या एल -12012/ 1/ 2003- आई . आर. ( बी. 11 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 15th February, 2005

S.O. 876. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby puhlishes the award ( Ref. No. 58/ 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 14-2-2005 .

[No. L - 12012 / 1 /2003 - IR ( B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy. ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri E. Ismail . B.Sc .. LL.B. Presiding Officer Dated the 29th Day of December, 2004 Industrial Dispute No. 58/2003

BETWEEN :

Smt . Y. Prabhavati ,

C/ o E. Jangamaiah ,

Vasanthnagar (Presiding Officer ) ,

Canal Bund. Kamaiah Thopu ,

Petitioner Vijayawada.

AND

The Dy. General Manager ,

Syndicate Bank. Zonal Office , Pioncer House . 6-3-653 , Somajiguda,

Hyderabad - 500482 .

Respondent APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : Sri William Burra . Advo- cale.

For the Respondent : M/ s . A. Krishnam Raju , G. Dinesh Kumar , G. V. Ν . Babu , N. Premanand Rao & K. Naresh Reddy. Advo- cates.

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L - 12012/ 1 /2003 - IR ( B. II ) dated 19-5-2003 referred the following dispute under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the 1. D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the employers in relation to the Management of Syndicate Bank and their workman.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank in terminating the services of Smt. Y. Prabhavathi , Ex - part-time Sweeper is justified ? If not. what relief the workman is entitled to ? " 2355 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 5, 2005/फाल्गुन 14 , 1926

This reference was registered as Industrial Dispute No. 58/2003 and notices were issued to the parties .

6. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that although she has worked for five years for more than 240 days before termination of her service , no pay in lieu of notice, or any retrenchment compensation was paid . She submitted representation dated 24-12-2001 but the management turned down her request . The Petitioner is a workman defined under Sec . 2 (s ) and Sec . 25F is applicable and retrenchment compensation equivalent to 15 days average pay for every completed year of service should be paid . The continuous service defined under Sec . 25B of the Industrial Disputest , 1947, according to which if the workman during the period of 12 calendar months has actually worked under the employer for not less than 240 days it would be deemed that such person had continuous service for not less than onc ycar. Hence , he may be reinstated with back wages .

7. It is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondent that she cannotbe appointed in view of the circular No. 2564/98 dated 5-9-98 issued by the Respondent . Further there is a ban by the Government of India on fresh recruitment and Sec . 25F has no applicability. The regularization cannot be made as an ultimate rule. Hence , she is not entitled to any relief.

2. The brief facts as stated in the petition are : that the Petitioner was orally appointed as part time badli sweeper with the Respondent bank ( Currency Chest ) Vijayawada on 13-6-89 and continued till 3-9-2001 . She was dismissed w.e.f. 4-9-2001 orally. She has worked for more than 240 days during the calendar year from 1993 to 1997. After dismissal she made both oral and written representation but to no avail. She has taken up the matter for conciliation before the ALCC ( C ) , Vijayawada in the month of September, 2002. Meeting was conveyed but to no avail . Hence , the failure of conciliation and the reference to the Hon'ble Court. During 1993 to 1997 she has worked for 240 days and her termination without following Sec . 25F is illegal and against the provisions of law and also against the principles of natural justice . That the circular dated 5-9-98 which is made applicable to the cases prior to 5-9-98 i.e. from 1-1-1989 is against all cannons of law. Had it been known to the Petitioner that she is not entitled for regularization at the time of appointment on 13-6-89 she would have sought for better employment elsewhere . Now her age is barred. Hence, she may be directed to be reinstated and paid back wages from 4-9-2001.

3. A counter was filed stating that the Petitioner was engaged as a temporary badli time sweeper in Currency Chest, Vijayawada on various dates during the period between 13-6-89 and 4-9-2001 . All she worked in temporary vacancies caused due to the leave/absence of regular part time sweepers . The currency chest is having regular part time sweepers for the purpose of clearing premises and whenever the regular part time sweepers avails leave , not reported for duty Smt . Y. Prabhavathi was being engaged . She did not work prior to 1-1-89 and started working only from 13-6-89 . As suchi she was not entitled for empanelment as per instructions . A person who did not enter into employment through approved channels cannot have any right for regularization in his job irrespective of the length of service he has put in. Merely she worked for several days on daily wage basis, regularization cannot be made . Sec . 25 F is not applicable . Hence , the ID may be dismissed .

4. The Petitioner examined herself and deposed the facts as stated in the petition . In the cross - examination she deposed that she worked continuously from 1993 to 1997. Although it was 234 days in 1997 goes to 240 days including holidays . So it comes to 240 days and the said certificate is given by the bank itself.

8. It may be seen that WWI has stated that there was a chart marked as Ex . W2 that she worked for 279 days in 1993 , 361 days in 1994 , 361 days in 1995. 290 days in 1996 and 234 days in 1997 , in 1998 till she was removed worked for 3 days . It is not challenged that this Ex . W2, is false . In fact , the main contention of the Respondent bank is that because of some instructions to the bank, as she has not worked prior to 1-1-82 her case cannot be considered for regularization . If they could have accommodated her due to a circular which says that those who have worked prior to 1-1-82 will be regularized, she cannot be regularized because she has joined in 1992 . still Sec . 25F should have been complied with and she should have been given one month notice or pay in lieu thereof besides retrenchment compensation 15 days pay for every completed year of service . One cannot simply throw away one person who has been working for 10 years without any compensation or even a notice . In fact her representation was also enclosed vide Ex . W7 that she belongs to SC community and has worked for 1710 days on temporary basis . In fact it was addressed by Senior Manager to the Regional Manager, Syndicate Bank. Hence . I hold that the management of Syndicate Bank in terminating the services of Smt. Y. Prabhavathi . Ex . part time sweeper is not justified . The Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement . Hence , an award is passed holding that the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement as part time sweeper within 30 days from the publication of this award and as she is a poor lady and a part time sweeper and as the conditions have not been complied with , she is also entitled for 25% of the last drawn wages till the date of reinstatement , i.c. from 4-1-98 till she is reinstated.

Award passed accordingly. Trsnsmit .

Dictatedto Smt. K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 29th day of December. 2004.

5. Sri K. Vijava Mohan was examined as MW1 and he is Manager in Personnel Department at Regional office , Hyderabad of Syndicate Bank and admitted that the Petitioner was engaged between 13-6-89 and 4-9-2001 and stated all what he stated in the counter. In the cross- examination he deposed that he has not filed any attendance register. He denied that because of her continuous engageinent for more than 240 days in a year she is entitled for reinstatement with back wages .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer 2356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 5 , 2005 /PHALGUNA 14 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Appendix of evidence

Ex. M6 Copy of Ir. dt . 30-7-99from Manager, Currency Chest to Regl . Manager Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

Ex. M7 Copy of Ir. dt. 22-9-99 from Sr. Manager to ReglManager

WWI : Smt . Y. Prabhavathi MW1 : Sri K. Vijaya Mohan

Ex . M8 Copy of representation dt . 24-12-2001 and 3-5-2001 from WWI to Respondent Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex. M9 : Copy of Ir.dt . 11-11-2002 from Chief Manager to ALC (C )/VJA

Ex . M1 Copy of Ir . dt . 22-1-97 from Manager , Currency Chest to the Respondent

Ex. M10 : Copy of representation from WW1 dt. 3-5-2002

Ex . M2 : Copy of representation of WW1 dt . 21-1-98 to the Respondent

Ex. M11 : Copy of Ir. from Petitioner to ALC( C) Ex . M3 :Details ofNo. of days worked by WW1 from 13-6-89 to 3-1-98

Documents marked for the Respondent

Ex . M1 Copy of circular No. 12/89 dt . 3-3-89 Ex . M4 : Copy of representationdt . 19-3-99 from WW1 to the Respondent

Ex . M2 Copy of circular No. 1/94 dt . 5-5-94

Ex . M3 Copy of circular No. 2564/98 dt . 5-9-98 Ex . M5 : Copy of Ir. dt . 1-6-99 from Sr. Manager to Regl . Manager

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road , Maya Puri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 , 2005