रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05
REGD . No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05
सत्यमेव जयते
भारत राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 9]
No. 9]
नई दिल्ली, मई 1 - मई 7, 2005 , शनिवार/वैशाख 11- वैशाख 17, 1927 NEW DELHI, MAY 1-MAY 7 , 2005, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 11-VAISAKHA 17, 1927
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( iii) PART II Section 3-Sub- section (iii)
केन्द्रीय अधिकारियों (संघ राज्य क्षेत्र प्रशासनों को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किये गये आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Orders and Notifications issued by Central Authorities (other than the Administrations of Union Territories)
भारत निर्वाचन आयोग
नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल, 2005
आ. अ. 47.- भारत निर्वाचन आयोग , 26 - चन्द्रपुर लोक सभा निर्वाचन क्षेत्र से लोक सभा के लिए श्री पुगलिया नरेशकुमार चुन्नालाल के निर्वाचन को चुनौती देने वाली श्री हंसराज द्वारा दाखिल 1999 की अर्जी सं० 4 में मुम्बई उच्च न्यायालय के तारीख 11 मार्च, 2005 का निर्णय लोक प्रतिनिधित्व अधिनियम, 1951 ( 1951 का 43 ) की धारा 106 के अनुसरण में एतद्वारा प्रकाशित करता है ।
[निर्णय अंग्रेजी पाठ में छपा है ]
[सं. 82/महा-लो.स ./4/1999(नागपुर) ]
आदेशसे,
के० आर० प्रसाद, सचिव ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NewDelhi, the 27th April, 2005
O. N. 47. In pursuance of Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951) , the Election Commission of India hereby publishes the judgement dated 11-3-2005 of the High Court ofjudicature at Mumbai (Nagpur Bench) in Election Petition No. 4 of 1999 filed by Shri Hansraj challenging the election of Shri Puglia Nareshkumar Chunnalal to the Lok Sabha from 26 - Chandrapur Parliamentary Constituency.
1299 G1 /2005
(151) 152
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2005 /VAISAKHA 17, 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( iii)] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY : NAGPUR BENCH ,
NAGPUR
ELECTION PETITION NO . 4 OF 1999
Petitioner
Hansraj S /o Gangaram Ahir
Versus
TheReturning Officer & Ors .
.Respondents
With an intimation that upon hearing:
Mr. S. P. Palshikar, Adv. for Petitioner.
Mr. R. K. Deshpande , Adv. for R - 1 .
The Court passes the following order:
Coram: K. J. Rohee , J.
Dated: 11-3-2005
"Heard the learned counsel for the parties ,
Since the term of the Lok Sabha ended in April , 2004 and there are no allegations of corrupt practice in the present petition, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs .
The statutory deposit made by the petitioner be refunded to him. "
By the Court, Sd/-
D.H. RANE, Dy. Registrar [No. 82/MT-HP/4 / 1999 (Nagpur) ]
By Order, K. R. PRASAD , Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल, 2005
आ. अ. 48.-भारत निर्वाचन आयोग , 19 -अकोला लोक सभा निर्वाचन क्षेत्र से लोक सभा के लिए श्री अम्बेडकर प्रकाश यशवंत के निर्वाचन को चुनौती देने वाली श्री पांडुरंग द्वारा दाखिल 1999 की अर्जी सं ० 5 में मुम्बई उच्च न्यायालय के तारीख 10 मार्च, 2005 का निर्णय लोक प्रतिनिधित्व अधिनियम, 1951 ( 1951 का 43 ) की धारा 106 के अनुसरण में एतद्वारा प्रकाशित करता है ।
[निर्णय अंग्रेजी पाठ में छपा है ।
[सं. 82/महा.-लो.स. /5/ 1999 ( नागपुर) ]
आदेश से,
के० आर० प्रसाद, सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th April, 2005
O. N. 48. In pursuance of Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 ( 43 of 1951) , the Election Commission of India hereby publishes the Judgement dated 10-3-2005 of the High Court ofjudicature at Mumbai (Nagpur Bench) in Election Petition No. 5 of 1999 filed by Shri Pandurang challenging the election of Shri Ambedkar Prakash Yashwant to the Lok Sabha from 19 -Akola Parliamentary Constituency.
153 [भाग II-खंड 3 (iii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2005/वैशाख 17, 1927
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY : NAGPUR BENCH ,
NAGPUR
ELECTION PETITION NO . 5 OF 1999
Office Notes , Officer Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or Court'sor Judge's orders directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Dated:March 10, 2005
The matter was kept today for dismissal, in view ofthe orders passed on 02-03-2005.
Advocate Palshikar, for Election Petitioner and Advocate Mathur, holding for Advocate P. D. Meghe, for respondent No. 2 are present. Both the Counsels state that the matter has become infructous and the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Election Petition further.
TheElection Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructous.
i
TRUE COPY
Sd/- DeputyRegistrar HighCourt ofBombay Nagpur Bench, Nagpur.
[No. 82/MT -HP/5 / 1999 (Nagpur)]
ByOrder,
K.R. PRASAD , Secy.
Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064
Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi - 110054.