This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04 /0007/ 2003-05

भारत काराजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं० 32 ]

नई दिल्ली, जुलाई 31 अगस्त 6, 2005 , शनिवार/ श्रावण १-श्रावण 15, 1927

No. 32 ]

NEW DELHI , JULY 31- AUGUST 6, 2005 , SATURDAY/SRAVANA 9-SRAVANA 15, 1927 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड (ii)

PART II-Section 3 Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

विधि और न्याय मंत्रालय

अगले आदेश तक, इनमें से जो भी पूर्वतर हो, अपर लोक अभियोजक केरूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

(विधिकार्य विभाग)

[फा० सं० 23 (2) /2005 -न्या. ] नई दिल्ली, 18 जुलाई, 2005

डी.आर. मीणा , संयुक्त सचिव और विधि सलाहकार

MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Department of Legal Affairs) New Delhi , the 18th July, 2005 का. आ. 2716. केन्द्रीय सरकार दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 (1974 का 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, -

(1 ) सुश्री पूर्णिमा कंथारिया, अधिवक्ता, मुम्बई,

(2) श्री जितेन्द्र आर. सोलंकी, अधिवक्ता, मुम्बई, और

S.O. 2716. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (1) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints,-

(3 ) श्री विनोद भागवत जोशी, अधिवक्ता, मुम्बई,

(1) Ms. Poornima Kantharia, Advocate , Mumbai,

(2) Shri Jitendra R. Solanki , Advocate, Mumbai , and

(3) Shri Vinod Bhagwat Joshi, Advocate, Mumbai,

as Additional Public Prosecutors for the purpose of conducting all criminal cases including Criminal Writ Petitions , Criminal Appeals , Criminal Revisions , Criminal References and Criminal Applications by or against the Union of India or any Department or Office of the Central Government, in the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai , with immediate effect for a period of three years or until further orders , whichever is earlier, subject to the condition thatMs. Poornima Kantharia, Advocate , Shri Jitendra

(8709)

को मुम्बई उच्च न्यायालय में भारत संघ या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय द्वारा या उसके विरुद्ध सभी दांडिक मामलों का, जिनके अंतर्गत दांडिक रिट याचिकाएं, दांडिक अपीलें, दांडिक पुनरीक्षण, दांडिक निर्देश और दांडिक आवेदन भी हैं, संचालन करने के प्रयोजन केलिए इस शर्त के अधीन रहते हुए कि सुश्री पूर्णिमा कंथारिया, अधिवक्ता, श्रीजितेन्द्र आर. सोलंकी, अधिवक्ता और श्री विनोद भागवत जोशी, अधिवक्ताअपर लोक अभियोजक के रूप में अपनी नियुक्ति की अवधि केदौरान भारत संघ या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय के विरुद्ध ऊपर निर्देशित किसी दांडिक मामले में मुम्बई उच्च न्यायालय में उपसंजात नहीं होंगे, तत्काल प्रभाव से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए या 2211 G1 / 2005 8710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

वित्त मंत्रालय

(राजस्वविभाग )

( कार्यालय आयुक्त, केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क ) मेरठ, 12जुलाई, 2005

R. Solanki , Advocate and Shri Vinod Bhagwat Joshi , Advocate, shall not appear against the Union of India or anyDepartment or OffiOffice of the Central Government in any criminal case referred to above in the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai during the period of their appointments as Additional Public Prosecutor.

[F. No. 23 (2)/2005- Judl . ]

संख्या 02/सी. शु. ( एनटी ) मे- II D.R. MEENA, Jt . Secy. and Legal Adviser

कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत और पेंशन मंत्रालय ( कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 28 जुलाई, 2005

का० आ० 2718.- सीमा शुल्क, अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 8 की उप धारा ( ए) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं, अनन्या रे, आयुक्त, केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क मेरठ- II , एत‌द्वारा आयात माल को विनिर्माण की प्रक्रिया में प्रयोग एवं तदनन्तर उनके डिस्पोजल हेतु प्राप्त करने , स्टोर करने तथा लागू सुसंगत नियमों और प्रक्रियाओं काअनुपालन करते हुए डिवलपरों एवं यूनिट होल्डरों द्वारा एस. ई जेड केविकास के लिए सीमा शुल्क क्षेत्र हेतु भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना संख्या 65/2004 सीमा शुल्क ( एन टी ) दिनांक 11-05-2004 में दिए गए गाँवों , जिले और खसरा नम्बर, क्षेत्रफल व सीमा में समाविष्ट स्थानों में स्थित मुरादाबाद स्पेशल इकोनोमिक जोन हेतु नीचे दी गई सारणी में दिए गए ब्यौरे के अनुसार पार्ट एरिया का अनुमोदन करती हूँ ।

स्पेशल इकोनोमिक जोन मुरादाबाद का क्षेत्रफल 95.30 हेक्टेयर होगा । इस क्षेत्रफल में से 21.20 हेक्टेयर क्षेत्र पुलिस चौकी, कार्यालयों के लिए प्रशासनिक भवन तथा अन्य प्रयोग के लिए होगा और यह नॉन- प्रोसेसिंग एरिया होगा । शेष 74.10 हेक्टेर क्षेत्र स्पेशल इकोनोमिक जोन रूल्स, 2003 के तहत प्रोसेसिंग एरिया निर्धारित किया जाता है ।

पुनः सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 8 की उप धारा (बी ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं, नीचे दिए गए खसरा नम्बर एवं सीमाओं के अनुसार गाँव बहादुरपुर, राजपूत एवं लालपुर गंगवाड़ी तहसील बिलारी , जिला मुरादाबाद ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) में स्थित एस. ई . जेड की उपर्युक्तानुसार प्रोसेसिंग, प्रप्रिया की सीमा एवं विस्तार कानिर्धारण करती हूँ ।

का. आ. 2717.-केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 को अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार के गृह ( पुलिस ) अनुभाग- II के सं. 1488 टी ( 1 )/6- पी - 11-2003-238 एम/2001 दिनांक 17 मई, 2003 द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार की सहमति से पुलिस स्टेशन मरिहान , मिर्जापुर, उ.प्र. में भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 147/148/149/307 और दंड विधि संशोधन अधिनियम की धारा 7 के अधीन दर्ज मामला अपराध सं. 51/2001 ; आयुध अधिनियम की धारा 25के अधीन अपराध मामला सं. 52, 53/2001 ; विस्फोटक अधिनियम की धारा 5 के अधीन अपराध सं. 54, 55/2001 और आयुध अधिनियम की धारा 25 के अधीन अपराध सं. 56 से 66/2001 तथा उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्न , दूष्प्रेरण और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उ‌द्भूत किसीअन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।

क्र. गाँव व जिले

रकबा

खसरा नम्बर [फा.सं . 228/55/2003 - ए वी डी- II ]

सं. का नाम

(हेक्टेअर में )

चन्द्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव

18.451

बहादुरपुर

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

124, 126, 127 , 128 ,

राजपूत

130, 132 , 133 , 134,

135, 139 , 140 , 141 , (Department of Personnel and Training) New Delhi , the 28th July, 2005

142, 143 , 144, 154,

160, 162 , 163 , 164 ,

165 , 166 , 167 , 168 ,

170 , 171 , 173 , 174 ,

176 , 177, 178 , 182 , 183.

55.618

लालपुर गंगवाड़ी

1 , 2, 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ,

12, 13 , 14, 16 , 17 ,

18, 19, 20, 21 , 23 ,

24, 27, 28, 30 , 31 ,

32, 33 , 34, 35 , 36 ,

37, 41 , 42, 45 , 46 ,

47, 48, 49, 52 एम,

55, 56, 57, 59 , 60 ,

61 , 63, 64, 65 , 66 ,

67, 75 , 76 , 77 , 79 , S.O. 2717 - In exercise of the powers - conferred by sub - section ( 1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Uttar Pradesh vide Home (Police) Section- II No. 1488T ( 1 )/6P- 11-2003-238M/2001 dated 17th May, 2003 hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the member ofthe Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole ofthe State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation of Case CrimeNo. 51/2001 u/s 147/148/149/307 IPC and Section 7ofCriminal Law Amendment Act; Crime Nos . 52, 53/2001 u/s 25 ofArms Act Crime Nos . 54, 55/2001 u/ s 5 of Explosive Act, and Crime Nos . 56 to66/2001 u/s 25 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Marihan, Mirzapur , UP and attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

80, 83, 84, 85 एम ,

123, 123/1395,124,

124/1394 , 125,126 , [F. No. 228/ 55/2003 -AVD- II] CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

55.618

127, 128, 129, 130 , 2. लालपुरगंगवाडी

131 , 132, 133 , 134,

135, 137, 138 , 139 ,

140, 141 , 142, 143 ,

145, 146, 147, 148 ,

150 , 151 , 152 , 153 ,

155, 156, पॉकेट- ए- मुरादाबाद स्पेशल इकोनोमिक जोन एन एच-24 से लगभग 6.0 कि.मी. की दूरी पर पाकबड़ा-दिंगारपुर रोड के बार्थी ओर निम्नलिखित सीमाओं के अनुसार स्थित है:-

सीमाएं-

उत्तर- गाँव बहादुर पुर राजपूत को जाने वाली चेक रोड दक्षिण-लालपुर गंगवाड़ी रोड

पूर्व-लालपुर गंगवाड़ी गाँव की सीमा

पश्चिम- पी डब्ल्यूडी रोड

उक्त प्रोसेसिंग एरिया की 11 फीट ऊँची बाउन्डरी वॉल एवं उसके ऊपर दो फीट ऊंची कंटीले तारों की बाड़ से घेराबंदी की गई है । बाड़से घेराबंदी किए गए क्षेत्र से माल को लाने ले जाने के लिए पश्चिम की ओर केवल एक प्रवेश और निकास गेट है ।

[फा. सं. VIII ( 30 ) सी. शु. /एस ई जेड/मे- II/21/03 ]

अनन्या रे, आयुक्त MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

(OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE ) Meerut , the 12th July, 2005

No. 02/CUS (NT)/M - II

S.O. 2718 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (a) of Section 8 of the Custom Act, 1962 , I Ananya Ray, Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise , Meerut - II hereby approve the part area, as specified in table below, of the Moradabad Special Economic Zone located at Villages , District and comprising of the places bearing the Khasra numbers , area and boundaries specified bythe Government of India vide Notification No. 65/2004 Customs (NT) dated 11-05-2004 as Custom area for the receipt , storage and use of the imported goods in the process of manufacture and subsequent disposal thereof and for the development of SEZ by the developer and unit holders, as per strict observance of the relevant Rules and procedure in force.

Special Economic Zone , Moradabad will cover an area of 95.30 Hectares . Out of this area 21.20 Hectares will include areas for Police Out-Post , Administrative Building for offices, and other uses and it will be the non -processing area . The remaining area of 74.10 Hectares is designated as processing area under Special Economic Zone Rules , 2003 .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred under sub- section (b) of Section 8 of the Customs Act, 1962, I also specify the boundaries , and the limit of the above stated processing area of SEZ situated at village Bahadurpur

8711 Rajput and Lalpur Gangawari , Tehsil Bilari , District Moradabad (Uttar Pradesh) , bearing specific khasra numbers and enclosed by the boundaries as specified below:-

KhasraNos.

S. Name ofVillage

No. andDistrict

Rakba ( in Hect.)

18.451

124, 126, 127, 128 , 1. Bahadurpur

130, 132, 133 , 134 , Rajput

135, 139, 140 , 141 ,

142, 143 , 144, 154,

160 , 162, 163 , 164 ,

165 , 166, 167 , 168 ,

170, 171 , 173 , 174,

176, 177 , 178 , 182 ,

183 .

1 , 2, 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 2. LalpurGangawari 55.618

12, 13, 14, 16 , 17,

18, 19, 20 , 21 , 23 ,

24, 27, 28 , 30, 31 ,

32, 33 , 34, 35, 36 ,

37, 41 , 42, 45 , 46,

47, 48, 49 , 52 M,

55, 56, 57, 59 , 60,

61 , 63, 64, 65 , 66 ,

67, 75 , 76 , 77, 79 ,

80, 83 , 84, 85 M ,

123, 123 /1395,124,

124/1394, 125,126,

127, 128 , 129 , 130 ,

131 , 132, 133 , 134,

135, 137, 138 , 139 ,

140, 141 , 142, 143 ,

145, 146, 147, 148 ,

150, 151 , 152, 153 ,

155, 156 .

Pocket-A-Moradabad Special Economic Zone is situated atadistance ofaprox. 6.0 KM from the NH -24 , on the left side of the ' Pakbara -Dingarpur ' Road within the following boundaries :

Boundaries : -

North-Chak Road leading to village Bahacurpur Rajput South- Lalpur Gangawari Road

East-Lalpur Gangawari village boundary

West-P.W.D. Road

The said processing area has been fortified by the boundary wall of 1 1 feet height and barbed v ire fencing of 2feet height thereon . There is only one entry and exit gate facing west for inward and outward movement ofthe goods to and from the fenced processing area .

[F. No. VIII (30) Cus/ SEZ/ Mirt - II/21/03 ] ANANYA RAY, Commissioner 8712

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क आयुक्तालय पंचकुला, 26 जुलाई, 2005 सं.1 /2005-सीमा शुल्क ( अधि. )

का. आ. 2719.-सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन प्रदत्त अधिकार के तहत अधिसूचना सं. 33/94 सीभा शुल्क (अधि. ) दिनांक 1 जुलाई , 1994 के साथ पठित वि.म. ( रा.वि. ) परिपत्र सं. 31/2003 सीमा शुल्क दिनांक 07-04-2003 द्वारा प्रत्यायोजित अधिकार के अनुसार, मैं हरियाणा राज्य के जिला करनाल में स्थित गांव कुन्जपुरा को इसके साथ माल गोदाम स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित करता हूं ताकि वहां विकास आयुक्त, नोएडा विशेष आर्थिक जोन , नोएडा दादरी मार्ग फेस-2, नोएडा-201305 जिला गौतमबुद्ध नगर, (उत्तर प्रदेश ) वाणिज्य एवं उद्योग मंत्रालय , वाणिज्य विभाग , भारत सरकार द्वारा अनुमोदित केवल शत प्रतिशत निर्यातोन्मुखी स्थापित की जा सके । [फा. सं. IV( 16 ) 1 /त.सी.शु./अधि./मु./पंचकुला/ 05 ]

पी. के. सिरोही, आयुक्त (OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS)

Panchkula, the 26th July, 2005

No. 1/2005 -CUSTOMS (N.T. )

S.O. 2719. In exercise of the powers conferred byNotification No. 33/94 -Cus. (N.T. ) dated 1-7-94 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finanace , Department of Revenue, New Delhi , I hereby declare Kunjpura Village , Distt. Karnal in the State ofHaryana, to be a warehousing station under Section 9 of Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) for the limited purpose of setting up 100% Export Oriented Unit as approved by the Asstt . Development Commissioner, O/o the Development Commissioner, Noida Special Economic Zone, Noida Dadri Road, Ph- II, Noida-201305, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar (UP), Deptt. of Commerce & Industry, Government of India.

[F. No. IV( 16) 1 /Tech. Cus./Notfn./HQ/PKL/05 ]

P. K. SIROHI, Commissioner पंचकुला, 27 जुलाई , 2005

सं. 2/2005-सीमा शुल्क ( अधि. )

का. आ. 2720.- सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन प्रदत्त अधिकार के तहत अधिसूचना सं. 33/94 सीमा शुल्क (अधि. ) दिनांक 1 जुलाई , 1994 के साथ पठित वि.भ. (रा.वि. ) परिपत्र सं. 31/2003 सीमा शुल्क दिनांक 07-04-2003 द्वारा प्रत्यायोजित अधिकार के अनुसार, मैं , हरियाणा राज्य के जिला कुरुक्षेत्र को इसके साथ प्रत्यायोजित माल गोदाम स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित करता हूं ताकि वहां महानिदेशक, सोफ्टवेयर टैक्नोलोजी पार्कस ऑफ इंडिया ( सूचना एवं तकनीकी विभाग ) संचार एवं सूचना तकनीकी मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार , बी-99 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, फेस 8 , मोहाली द्वारा अनुमोदित केवल शत प्रतिशत निर्यातोन्मुखी स्थापित की जा सके ।

[फा. सं. IV(16 ) 2/त.सी.शु./अधि./मु./पंचकुला/05 ]

पी. के. सिरोही, आयुक्त Panchkula, the 27th July, 2005 No. 2/2005 - CUSTOMS(N.T. )

S.O. 2720. In exercise of the powers conferred byNotification No. 33/94- Cus . (N.T. ) dated 1-7-94 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finanace , Department of Revenue, New Delhi , I hereby declare Kurukshetra in the State of Haryana to be a Warehousing station under Section 9 ofCustoms Act , 1962 (52 of 1962) for the limited purpose of setting up 100 % Export Oriented Unit as approved by the Additional Director General , Software Technology Parks of India (Department of Information Technology) , Ministry of Communication and I. T. Govt . of India, B-99, Industrial Area, Phase- VIII, Mohali - 160071 , Punjab.

[F. No. IV( 16) 2/Tech. Cus./Notfn./HQ/PKL/05 ] P. K. SIROHI , Commissioner (कार्यालय आयुक्त केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क )

जालंधर, 28 जुलाई, 2005

सं. 1/2004- सीमाशुल्क ( एन.टी. )

का. आ. 2721.- भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली की अधिसूचना संख्या 33/ 99- सीमा शुल्क ( एनटी ) दिनांक 1-7-94 में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एतदद्वारा सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 की संख्या 52 ) की धारा 9 के अन्तर्गत पंजाब राज्य के गांव बाल कलां/बाल खुर्द, चुंगी चौकी के बाहर, बाई पास, मजीठा रोड़, अमृतसर को शत प्रतिशत निर्यातोन्मुख उपक्रम के उ‌द्देश्य के लिये भांडागार स्टेशन घोषित किया जाता है । [फा. सं. VIII ( मुख्या ) 20/27/डी. बी. के./2004 ]

गौतम भट्टाचार्य, आयुक्त (OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE)

Jalandhar, the 28th July, 2005 No. 1/2004- CUSTOMS (N.T. )

S.O. 2721. In exercise of the powers conferred byNotification No. 33 /94-Cus . (N.T. ) dated 1-7-94 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi, Village Bal Kalan/Bal Khurd, outside Octroi Post, Bye Pass , Majitha Road, Amritsar in the State ofPunjab is hereby declared to be a warehousing station under section 9 ofthe Customs Act, 1962 (No. 52 of 1962) forthe purpose of setting up of a Hundred Percent Export Oriented Unit ( 100 % EOU) .

[F. No. VIII (HQ) 20/24/DBK/2005 ] GAUTAM BHATTACHARYA, Commissioner [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

आयकर

का. आ. 2722.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ ' विश्वविद्यालय, कॉलेज अथवा अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत दिनांक 1-4-2004 से 31-3-2007 तक की अवधि के लिए संगठन हैदराबाद साइंस सोसायटी 12-2-460 , मेहदीपटनम, हैदराबाद-500028 , आन्ध्र प्रदेश, जो अंशतः अनुसंधान कार्य - कलापों में कार्यरत है ( और न कि अनुसंधान मात्र के लिए मौजूद ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ ' रूप में है) , को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है:-

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के लिए अलग खाते रखेगा।

( ii) वित्तीय वर्षों के प्रत्येक वित्त वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए अनुमोदन प्रदान किया जा रहा है , अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्य-कलापों के संबंध में लेखा परीक्षित आय एवं व्यय खाते की एक प्रति इसके क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक (छूट ) को आयकर विवरणी दाखिल करने की नियत तारीख को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 90 दिन के अन्दर, जो भी बाद में समाप्त हो, प्रस्तुत करेगा, जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है ।

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन उपर्युक्त पैरा ( ii ) में उल्लिखित आय तथा व्यय खाते के साथ लेखा परीक्षक से प्राप्त एक प्रमाणपत्र भी संलग्न करेगा:-

(क) जिसमें संगठन द्वारा वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त कीगई उस राशि का उल्लेख किया गया हो, जिसके लिए दानकर्ता धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं । (ख) जिसमें यह प्रमाणित किया गया हो कि किया गया व्यय वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए ही था ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 183/2005/फा. सं. 203/8/2005- आ.क.नि. - II ]

8713

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

the Income Tax Act, 1961 , read with rule 6 of the Income Tax Rules , 1962 for the period from 1-4-2004 to 31-3-2007 under the category, ' University college or other institution'" partyengaged in research activities (and not as a ' scientific research association' existing solely for research) subject to the following conditions :-

(1) The approved organisation shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities.

(ii) For each of the financial years for which the approval is being given , the approved organisation shall submit a copy of its audited Income and Expenditure account in respect of the research activities for which it has been approved under sub-section (1 ) of Section 35 of Income tax Act, 1961 to the Commissioner of Income-tax or Director of Income- tax (exemptions) having jurisdiction, on or before the due date of filing of return of income or within90 days from the date ofthis notification, whichever expires later.

(ii) The approved organisation shall also enclose with the Income and Expenditure account referred to inparagaraph ( ii ) above, a certificate from the auditor:-

(a) specifying the amount received by the organisation for scientific research in respect of which the donors are eligible to claim deduction under clause (ii ) of sub -section ( 1 ) ofSection 35 .

(b) certifying that the expenditure incurred was for scientific research.

[Notification No. 183/2005/F. No. 203 /8 /2005 -ІТА- II] NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 25 जुलाई, 2005 आयकर

निधिसिंह, अवर सचिव

CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES New Delhi, the 13th July, 2005 INCOME-TAX

S.O. 2722. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation Hyderabad Science Society, 12-2-460 , Mehdipatanam, Hyderabad -500028 , Α.Ρ. has been approved by the Central Government for the purposes of clause ( ii ) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of का. आ. 2723.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि संगठन स्किजोफ्रेनिया रिसर्च फाउंडेशन ( इंडिया ) , प्लॉट आर 7 ए नार्थ मेन रोड, अन्नानगर वेस्ट एक्सटेंशन, चेन्नई -600101 को केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में आंशिक रूप से संलग्न ( तथा न कि अनुसंधान मात्र के लिए मौजूद ' वैब्रानिक अनुसंधान संघ के रूप में' ) , विश्वविद्यालय , कालेज अथवा अन्य संस्था श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत दिनांक 1-4-2003 से 8714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

31-3-2006 तक की अवधि के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है:-

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के लिए अलग खाते रखेगा ।

(ii ) वित्तीय वर्षों के प्रत्येक वित्त वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए अनुमोदन प्रदान किया जा रहा है , अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के संबंध में लेखा परीक्षित आय एवं व्यय खाते की एक प्रति इसके क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को आयकर विवरणी दाखिल करने की नियत तारीख को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से १० दिन के अन्दर , जो भी बाद में समाप्त हो , प्रस्तुत करेगा, जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है ।

(क) जिसमें संगठन द्वारा वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त कीगई उस राशिका उल्लेख किया गया हो , जिसके लिए दानकर्ता धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं । (ख) जिसमें यह प्रमाणित किया गया हो कि किया गया व्यय वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए ही था ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 186/2005/ फा. सं. 203/87/2004- आ.क.नि. II ]

निधिसिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th July, 2005 INCOME- TAX

S.O. 2723. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation Schizophrenia Research Foundation ( India) Plot R. 7 A, North Main Road , Anna NagarWest Extension , Chennai -600101 has been approved by the Central Government for the purposes of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income Tax Act , 1961 read with rule 6 of the Income tax Rules 1962 for the period from 1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 under the category, University college or other institution, party engaged in research activities ( and not as a scientific research association existing solely for research) subject to the following conditions :-

(i) The approved organisation shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities .

(ii) For each of the financial years for which the approval is being given, the approved organisation shall submit a copy of its audited Income and Expenditure account in respect of

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)] the research activities for which it has been approved under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income tax Act, 1961 to the Commissioner of Income-tax or Director of Income- tax (exemptions ) having jurisdiction, on or before the due date of filing of return of income or within 90 days from the date of this notification, whichever expires later.

(iii) The approved organisation shall also enclose with the Income and Expenditure account referred to in paragaraph (ii) above , a certificate from the auditor:-

(a) specifying the amount received by the organisation for scientific research in respect of which the donors are eligible to claim deduction under clause ( ii) of sub-section ( 1 ) ofSection35.

(b) certifying that the expenditure incurred was for scientific research .

[Notification No. 186/2005/F. No. 203/87/2004-ITA- II] NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy.

(आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिंग प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 27 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2724. - भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ( अनुषंगी बैंक ) अधिनियम, 1959 की धारा 25 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतदद्वारा वित्त मंत्रालय , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग , बैंकिंग प्रभाग , नई दिल्ली में अवर सचिव श्री एम . के. मल्होत्रा को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेशों तक स्टेट बैंक आफ बीकानेर एंड जयपुर के निदेशक मंडल में सुश्री पी. बोलिना के स्थान पर निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/11/2004-बीओ -1 ]

जी. बी. सिंह, अवर सचिव (Department of Economic Affairs) (Banking Division) New Delhi , the 27th July, 2005

S.O. 2724. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 25 of the State Bank of India ( Subsidiary Banks ) Act , 1959 , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri M. K. Malhotra, Under Secretary, Ministry of Finance , Department of Economic Affairs , Banking Division , New Delhi as a Director on the Board of Directors of State Bank ofBikaner and Jaipur with immediate effect and until further orders vice Ms. P. Bolina ,

[F. No. 9/ 11/2004-BO. -I G. B. SINGH, Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8715

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/श्रावण 15, 1927

संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय

(दूरसंचार विभाग )

(राजभाषा अनुभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 25 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2725.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनोंके लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 1976 ( यथा संशोधित 1987 ) के नियम 10(4) के अनुसरण में संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय, दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है ।

1. मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार, भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, महाराष्ट्र परिमण्डल, मुंबई

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार, भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, यवतमाल 2. मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार, भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, पंजाब परिमण्डल, चण्डीगढ़

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार, भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, जालन्धर

[फा. सं. ई. 11016/1/2005 रा. भा. ]

हरीश चन्द्र जयाल, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Department of Telecommunications) (Official Language Section)

New Delhi , the 25th July, 2005

S.O. 2725. In pursuance of rule 10( 4) the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) , rules, 1976 ( as amended- 1987) , the Central Government hereby notifies the following Offices under the administrative control ofMinistry of Communications and Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications where of more than 80% of staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi .

1. ChiefGeneralManager Telecom. , BSNL, Maharashtra Circle,Mumbai

General Manager Telecom . BSNL, Yavatmal 2. ChiefGeneral Manager Telecom , BSNL, Punjab Circle, Chandigarh

PrincipalGeneral Manager Telecom. BSNL, Jallandhar

[F. No. E- 11016/1/2005 -O.L . ] HARISH CHANDRA JAYAL , Jt . Secy.

विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय

(विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2726.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, सरकारी स्थान (अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, और भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन निर्माण , आवास और पूर्ति मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं.

का.आ. 307 , तारीख 7 फरवरी 1959 को, जहां तक उसका संबंध भारतीय सर्वेक्षण की क्रम सं. 35 से है, उन बातों के सिवाय अधिक्रांत करते हुए, जिन्हें ऐसे अधिक्रमण से पूर्व किया है या करने का लोप किया गया है, नीचे सारणी के स्तंभ ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित अधिकारियों को, जो केन्द्रीय सरकारके राजपत्रित अधिकारी है, उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजन के लिए सम्पदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है , जो उक्त सारणी के स्तंभ (2) में की तत्स्थानी प्रविष्टियों में विनिर्दिष्ट सरकारी स्थान के संबंध में, अपनी-अपनी अधिकारिता की स्थानीय सीमाओं के भीतर उक्त अधिनियम द्वारा या उसके अधीन सम्पदा अधिकारियों को प्रदत्त शक्तियों काप्रयोग और उन पर अधिरोपित कर्तव्यों का पालन करेंगे ।

सारणी

अधिकारी का पदनाम

अधिकारिता की स्थानीय सीमाएं (1)

(2)

1. उप महासर्वेक्षक,

मध्यप्रदेश भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ाकेन्द्र,

भारतीय सर्वेक्षण,

भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन उनकी अपनी-अपनी अधिकारिता की स्थानीय सीमाओं के भीतर अवस्थितस्थान ।

जबलपुर

उप निदेशक, 2. महाराष्ट्र और गोवा भू- स्थानिक आंकडा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण, पूणे ।

3. उप निदेशक,

हरियाणा भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण, चण्डीगढ़ ।

4. निदेशक, मेघालय और अरूणाचल प्रदेश भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ाकेन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण , शिलांग। '

5. निदेशक,

उड़ीसा भू-स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण,

भुवनेश्वर ।

6. उप निदेशक,

झारखण्ड भू- स्थानिक आंकडा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण, रांची ।

7. निदेशक,

कर्नाटक भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र भारतीय सर्वेक्षण, बंगलौर ।

8 . उप निदेशक,

भूगणितीय और अनुसंधान शाखा भारतीय सर्वेक्षण, देहरादून । 8716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005/SRAVANA 15, 1927

(1)

(2)

9. उप निदेशक, सर्वेक्षण प्रशिक्षण संस्थान, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण, हैदराबाद ।

10. अधीक्षण सर्वेक्षक, कारबार और प्रसार, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण , देहरादून ।

भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग के प्रशानिक नियंत्रण के अधीन मसूरी की स्थानीय सीमाओं के भीतर अवस्थितस्थान । 11. अधीक्षण सर्वेक्षक, उत्तरांचल भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ाकेन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण, देहरादून ।

[फा.सं. एस एम/29/002/04 ] एस. चक्रवर्ती, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Department of Science and Technology) New Delhi , the 22nd July, 2005

S.O. 2726. In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ) , and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry ofWorks , Housing and Supply number S.O. 307, dated the 7th February, 1959 , in so far as it relates to serial number 35 relating to Survey of India, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession the Central Government hereby appoints the officers mentioned in column ( 1) of the Table below, being gazetted officers ofthe Central Government, to be estate officers for the purposes of the said Act, who shall exercise the powers conferred, and perform the duties imposed, on estate officers by or under the said Act within the local limits of their respective jurisdiction in respect of the public premises specified in the corresponding entries in column (2) ofthe said Table .

TABLE

Designation ofOfficers

Locallimits of jurisdiction (1)

(2)

1. Deputy Surveyor General, Madhya Pradesh Geospatial Data Dentre, Survey of India , Jabalpur.

2. DeputyDirector,

Premises under the administrative control of Survey of India Department situated withinthe local limits of their respective Jurisdiction .

Maharashtra and Goa Geospatial Data Centre , Survey of India, Pune .

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] (1)

(2)

3. Deputy Director, Haryana Geospatial Data Centre, Survey of India, Chandigarh

4. Director, Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh Geospatial Data Centre, Survey of India, Shillong

5. Director, Orissa Geospatial Data Centre, Survey of India, Bhubaneshwar

6. Deputy Director, Jharkhand Geospatial Data Centre, Survey of India, Ranchi

7. Director, Karnataka Geospatial Data Centre, Survey of India,Bangalore

8. Deputy Director , Geodetic and Research Branch, Survey of India, DehraDun

9. Deputy Director, Survey Training Institute, Survey of India, Hyderabad

10. Superintending Surveyor, Business and Publicity, *Survey of India, Dehra Dun

11. Superintending Surveyor, Uttaranchal Geospatial Data Centre , Survey of India, DehraDun

Premises under the administrative control of Survey of India Department situated withinthe local limits ofMussorie .

[F. No. SM/29/002/04] S. CHAKRAVARTHY, Under Secy.

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(स्वास्थ्यविभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 21 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2727.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख) के अनुसरण में तमिलनाडु में तमिलनाडु के डा. एम.जी.आर. मेडिकल 8717

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

विश्वविद्यालय के चिकित्सा संकाय के सदस्य डा. विजय लक्ष्मी, एम.डी. को तमिलनाडु के डा.एम. जी. आर. मेडिकल विश्वविद्यालय की सीनेट द्वारा इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया है । अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के उपबंधके अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्यमंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्: - उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ख) के अधीन निर्वाचित " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 68 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी , अर्थात्ः-

" 68 डा. विजय लक्ष्मी, तमिलनाडु डा. एम. जी. आर. मेडिकल एम. डी. सं.--9 , विश्वविद्यालय पुलिस कमिश्नर ऑफिस रोड, ऐगमोर, चैन्नई-

600008.

[सं. वी. - 11013/2/2004- एमई (नीति-1 ) ]

अरविंद कुमार, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE (Department ofHealth)

New Delhi , the 21st July, 2005

S.O. 2727. Whereas in pursuance of clause (b) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) Dr. P. Vijayalakshmi M. D. , Member oftheMedical faculty of the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai , has been elected by the Senate ofthe Tamil Nadu Dr. M. G.R. Medical University, Chennai to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the date of issue of this notification .

Now, therefore, in pursuance ofthe provision of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Goverment hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry ofHealth number S.O. 138 , dated the 9th January, 1960, namely: -

In the said Notification, under the heading, 'Elected under clause (b ) of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 , for serial number 68 and the entry relating thereto the following serial number and entry shall be substituted, namely:-

Dr. M.G.R. "68. Dr. P. Vijayalakshmi , Tamil Nadu

Medical MD, No. 9, Police

University, Commissioners

OfficeRoad, Egmore,

Chennai -600 008

[No. V- 11013/2/2004- ME(Policy - I) ]

ARVIND KUMAR, Under Secy.

2211 G1/05-2

नई दिल्ली, 21 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2728.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद्अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में डा. पवार वसन्त निवरूट्टी , सदस्य, कायचिकित्सा संकाय, पुणे विश्वविद्यालय को पुणे विश्वविद्यालय की सीनेट द्वारा इस अधिसूचना केजारी होने की तारीख से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया है ।

अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी, 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्ः - उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ख ) के अधीन निर्वाचित " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 18 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी, अर्थात्ः-

" 18. डा. पवार वसन्त निवरूट्टी पूना विश्वविद्यालय "गौतम"

सुश्रुत अस्पताल, शारणपुर रोड, नासिक-422002.

[सं. वी.- 11013/2/2004- एमई ( नीति-1 ) ]

अरविंद कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st July, 2005

S.O. 2728. Whears in pursuance of clause (b) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) Dr. Pawar Vasant Nivrutti , a member ofthe Medical faculty, University ofPune has been elected by the Senate of the University of Pune to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the date of issue of this notification .

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Goverment hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry ofHealth number S.O. 138 , dated the 9th January 1960, namely: -

Inthe saidNotification , under the heading , ' Elected under clause (b) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ' , for serial number 18 and the entry relating thereto the following serial number and entry shall be substituted, namely: - " 18. Dr. Pawar Vasant Nivrutti

Poona University "Gautem "

Shushrut Hospital , Sharanpur Road , Nasik-422002.

[No. V- 11013/2/2004- ME (Policy -1)]

ARVIND KUMAR, Under Secy.

8718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 7th July, 2005 विदेश मंत्रालय (सी. पी. वी. प्रभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 7 जुलाई, 2005

S.O. 2730. In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorise Shri Manoj Kumar, Assistant in the Consulate General of India, Hamburg to perform the duties ofAssistant Consular Officer with effect from 07-07-2005.

[No. T -4330/01/ 2005] का. आ. 2729.- राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) को धारा 2 के अंक ( क ) केअनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास, अम्मान् में श्रीमती काबेरी बैनर्जी, सहायक को 07-07-2005 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

R.K. JHA, Dy. Secy. ( Consular)

नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई, 2005 [सं. टी-4330/01/2005 ] राधा कान्त झा, उप सचिव ( कौंसुलर) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

आ. 2731.- राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ (C.P.V. Division) New Delhi , the 7th July, 2005

का. एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) को धारा 2 के अंक ( क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास, कुवेत में श्री नरेश कुमार, सहायक को 08-07-2005 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी-4330/01 / 2005 ] 5.O. 2729.- In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948) , the Central Government hereby authorise Smt . Kaberi Banerjee , Assistant in the Embassy of India, Amman to perform the duties of Assistant ConsularOfficer with effect from 07-07-2005 .

राधा कान्त झा, उप सचिव ( कौंसुलर )

[No. T-4330/01/2005 ]

NewDelhi , the 8th July, 2005 R.K. JHA, Dy. Secy. ( Consular) - नई दिल्ली, 7 जुलाई, 2005

S.O. 2731 .--In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act , 1948 (41 of 1948) , the Central Government hereby authorise Shri Naresh Kumar, Assistant in the Embassy of India, Kuwait to perform the duties of Assistant ConsularOfficer with effect from 08-07-2005 .

का. अ . 1730.- राजमयिक ती अधिकारी ( शपथ गर्द शुल्क) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के अंक ( क )? के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा भारत का प्रधान कौंसलावास, दैनबर्ग में श्री मनोज कुमार, सहायक को 07-07-2005 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[No. T-4330/01 /2005] R.K. JHA, Dy. Secy. (Consular) [सं. टी -4330/01/2005 ] राधा कान्त झा , उप सचिव ( कौंसुलर )

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्तामामलेविभाग )

भारतीय मानकब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2732.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक (कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं : -

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोभितभारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम संख्या आर शीर्षक

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1.

3दिसम्बर, 2004

31मई, 2005 13779 : 1999 ए सी स्थैतिक वाट घंटा मीटर, चर्ग 1 और 2-विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण ) ।

3 दिसम्बर, 2004

1 फरवरी, 2005 14697: 1999 ए सी स्थैतिक ट्रांसफार्मर चलित वाट घंटा एवं वीए जार घंटा-मीटर, वर्ग 0.2 एस तथा 0.5 एस-विशिष्टि

1 8719 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

इन भारतीय संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयोंः नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: ई टी13/टी -33 व टी-40] सुखबीर सिंह, प्रमुख ( एल आई टी डी) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION (Department of Consumer Affairs )

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS ) New Delhi , the 22nd July, 2005

S.O. 2732.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of ab - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies tha.mendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :-

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the Indian Standards

No. andyear of the Amendment

Sl. No.

Date from which the Amendment shall have effect

(3)

(4)

(2)

(1)

31May, 2005

3 December, 2004

IS 13779 : 1999 AC Static watthour meters , class 1 and 2-Specification

1 February, 2005 2.

3December, 2004

IS 14697 : 1999 AC Static transformer operated watthour meters and var -hour meters , class 0.2 S and 0.5 S and 1.0 S-Specification

Copyof these Amendments are available with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET 13/T-33 & T-40]

SUKHBIR SINGH, Head (LITD)

नईदिल्ली, 28 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 27.33.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि

स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हों, की संख्या और वर्ष

(3)

(4)

(2)

(1)

जून , 2005

आई एस 9302 ( भाग 10 ) : 1980 का अतिक्रमण करते हुए

आई एस 15572: 2004/आई ई सी 61938 : ( 1996 ) ऑडियो, विडियो एवं ऑडियोविजुअल तंत्र- अंतरासंयोजन एवं मैचिंग मान-समधर्मी संकेतों के अधिमान्य मैचिंग मान 8720

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

2. आई एस 15580: 2005/आई ई सी 21827: 2002 सूचना

जून, 2005

प्रोद्यौगिकी- सिस्टम सुरक्षा इंजीनियरी- सक्षमता परिपक्वता

मॉडल

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन , १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयोंः नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ: सं. एल टी डी/जी 75 ]

सुखबीर सिंह, प्रमुख ( एल आई टी डी )

New Delhi , the 28th July, 2005

S.O. 2733. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :-

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl . No :

No. & Year title of the Indian Standards Established

No.& year of Indian Standards ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

June, 2005

Superseding IS 9302 (Part10):1980

1. IS 15572: 2005 /IEC 619387 ( 1996) Audio, Video and audiovisual systems-Interconnections andmatching values-Preferred matching values of analogue signals

June, 2005

IS 15580 : 2005 /ISO/IEC 21827 : 2002 Information technology Systems security engineering- capability maturity model [ SSE - CMM (R) ]

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref. No. LTD/G- 75 ]

SUKHBIR SINGH, Head (LITD) 8721 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005 /श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

का.आ. 2734.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पंजाब उद्योग , जी टी उद्योग; डाकघर - धनोवली , जालंधर ( पंजाब ) -144010 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " पी यूडी- 1001 " श्रृंखला के सांदृश्य सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एटलस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/37 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

1001

SEN ACC D

उक्त माडल यांत्रिक विषमभुज तुला प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. सेअधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 % , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 ( 185 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2734-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

1 Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Platform type) weighing instrument with analogue indication of " PUD - 1001 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ATLAS " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Punjab Udyog , G.T. Udyog , P.Ο. Dhanowli , Jallandhar (Punjab ) -144010 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/2005/37;

1001

SEN

The said model is a mechanical steelyard type liver based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 2Kg . The verfication scale interval (e ) is 100g .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ment of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 1000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufac- turer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 185)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8723

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2005

का.आ. 2735.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओहस कारपोरेशन, 19 ए, चेपिन रोड, पाइन ब्लाक, यू एस ए और भारत में मटलर टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड, पोवई , मुंबई-400072 द्वारा विपणित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " प्रो- एस पी-4001 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 / 94 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 4000 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 0.1 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

000

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 (189 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8724

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II -SBC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2735. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Models described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication belonging to high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) of " Scout Pro - SP- 4001 " series with brand name "METTLER TOLEDO?" ( hereinafter referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/s Ohaus Corpora- tion , 19A , Chapin Road , Pine Book, U.S. A. and marketed in India by M/s . Mettler - Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hill , Saki Vihar Road, Mumbai and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/94 ;

The said model is a strain gauge load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) . The maximum capacity is 4000g and minimum capacity 5g. The value of verification scale interval (e) is 0.1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal (LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

000

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verfication scale inter- val ( n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 189)/ 2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8725

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2005

का.आ. 2736. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम, 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी , सराय रोहेल्ला, दिल्ली-110007 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एक्स बी 4200 सी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " प्रिसाइसा स्विस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005/ 121 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

Precisa

उक्त मॉडल विद्युत चुम्बकीय प्रतिकर सिद्धान्त पर आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 4200 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है निर्वात प्रतिदिप्ति प्रदर्श ( वी एफ डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 217 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2011 G1/05--3 PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 8726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2736. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " XB4200C" series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II) and with brand name " PRECISA - SWISS " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Electronic System, 84 , Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla , Delhi - 110 007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/ 121 ;

The said Model is an electromagnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 4200g and minimum capacity of 5g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100 mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Vacuum Florouscent Display (VFD ) indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudent practices .

Fer , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (217)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8727 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2005

का.आ. 2737.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम , 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी , सराय रोहेल्ला , दिल्ली -110007 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " क्यू बी जी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " इशिदा टोक्यो " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 / 122 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विद्युत चुम्बकीय प्रतिकर सिद्धान्त पर आधारित अस्वचालित (टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । निर्वात प्रतिदिप्ति प्रदर्श ( वी एफ डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत के उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 217 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ) 8728

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2737. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "QBG " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II) and with brand name "ISHIDA- TOKYO ' ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Electronic System , 84 , Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla , Delhi - 110 007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2005 / 122;

The said model is an electromagnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 3kg and minimum capacity of 5g. The verification scale interval (e) is 100mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The vacuum florouscent display indi- cates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

In additionto sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verifica- tion scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5× 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accor- dance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 217) /2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8729 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

का.आ. 2738.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान क्ररता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए . मैसर्स मेडिकेअर प्रोडक्ट आई एन सी, बी-30 , शारदापुरी , नई दिल्ली -110015 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एन सी पी " श्रृंखला के तुल्य रूप सूचन सहित ठोस नली प्रकार का नैदानिक तापमापी के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एम सी पी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005 /35 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ठोस नली कांच ( पारा ) में द्रव प्रकार का नैदानिक तापमापी रेंज 35 ° सें. से 42 ° सें. और न्यूनतम अन्तराल 0.1 ° सें. है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 277 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2738. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of solid stem type Clini- cal Thermometer with analogoue indication of series ' MCP ' ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , and with brand name ' MCP' manufacturedby M/ s . Medicare Products Inc. B -30 , Sharada Puri , New Delhi - 110015 and which is as- signed the approval mark IND/09/ 2005/35;

The said model is a solid stem type liquid in glass ( mercury) Clinical thermometer with analogue indication of range from 35° C. to 42° C. and the smallest interval is 0. 1º C.

[F. No. WM- 21 (277)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8731

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

का.आ. 2739.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलेक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम , 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी , सराय रोहेल्ला, दिल्ली-110007 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " इ के " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नामे " एण्ड - गल्फ " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्तमॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005/ 184 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा . तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 192 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8732

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2739. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EK " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "AND - GULF " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Electronic System, 84 , Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla, Delhi - 110007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2005 / 184;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weigh- ing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verifica- tion scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of $ 000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 * or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 192)/ 2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8733 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

नईदिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2005

का.आ. 2740.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम, 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी, सराय रोहेल्ला, दिल्ली -110007 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस के" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एण्ड- गल्फ" है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/ 185 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 %, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (192 )/2004]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2211 G1/05-4 8734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2740. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SK" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " AND - GULF " ( herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s. Electronic System , 84 , Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla, Delhi - 110007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2005/ 185 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weigh- ing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verifica- tion scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 192 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8735 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

नईदिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

का.आ. 2741.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम , 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी , सराय रोहेल्ला , दिल्ली -110007 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस के " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एण्ड- गल्फ" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/ 186 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 192) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 / SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2741. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SK " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " AND - GULF " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Electronic System, 84 , Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla, Delhi - 110007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2005/ 186 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 500kg and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also be cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 1000kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k, 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design , and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 192) /2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8737 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

नईदिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

का.आ. 2742.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के तीसरे परन्तुक और धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एंड्रेस हाउसर फलोटेक ए जी, कागेस 4153 रिइनाक बी एल 1 , स्वीटजरलैण्ड द्वारा निर्मित कारिओल्सि द्रव्यमान प्रवाह मीटर ( जल से भिन्न द्रव का मीटर ) और भारत में मैसर्स एंड्रेस हाउसर ( इंडिया ) प्रा. लि. एक्सकाम हाउस , भूतल फ्लोर, साउथ विंग 7 साकी विहार रोड, अंधेरी ( पू. ) मुंबई, इंडिया द्वारा विप्पणित प्रोमास 64 सहित प्रोमास सैन्सर पी.ए. या एन श्रृंखला के मॉडल का, जिसमें अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13 / 2005/ 36 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक अंकक सूचक ( एल सी डी) सहित कोरिआल्सि सिद्धांत के अनुसार कार्य करने वाला एक धनात्मक विस्थापन प्रवाह मीटर है , जिसका अभिहित व्यास 2 मि.मी. से 150 मि.मी. है । इसका उपयोग सभी प्रकार के द्रव और गैस के अभिरक्षा अन्तरण के लिए किया जाता है । इस प्रकार के द्रव्यमान मीटर का उपयोग 500 कि.ग्रा . /मी से 2000 कि.ग्रा. /मी के मध्य सघनता वाले तथा 50 ° सेंटीग्रेड और 200° सेंटीग्रेड के मध्य तापमान वाले सभी प्रकार के द्रवों को मापने के लिए किया जा सकेगा । ये द्रव गैस बुलबलों से मुक्त होने चाहिए और उनका ठोस भाग इस प्रकार के द्रव्यमान मीटरों से 1 प्रतिशत कम होना चाहिए । इस प्रकार का मीटरों का उपयोग 100 बार से 250 बार के मध्य दाब रेंज में इंधन गैस को मापने के लिए किया जा सकेगा ।

प्रोमास 64 एम प्रकार के मापन उपकरणों का उपयोग , उच्च दाब संस्करण सहित डी एन 8 , डी एन 15 और डी एन 25 के अभिहित व्यास सहित, 350 बार तक की दाब रेंज में इंधन गैसों को मापने के लिए किया जा सकेगा । इसका अधिकतम द्रव्यमान प्रवाह रेंज दर 2.0 कि.मी. / मि.से 12000 कि.मी. तक और न्यूनतम प्रवाह रेंज 0.1 कि.ग्रा. /मि. से 250 कि.ग्रा./मि. तक है । न्यूनतम मात्रा मापन रेंज 0.05 कि.ग्रा. /मि. से 200 कि.ग्रा./मि. तक है और मापमान अन्तराल रेंज का मान 0.1 ग्रा. से 1000 ग्रा. तक है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 257 )/ 2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2742.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, along with the model approval certificate issued by the Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt , Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany (PTB) is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) , and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - sections ( 3 ) and sub sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby approves , issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Coriolis Mass Flow meter (Meters for liquids -other than water ) of series PROMASS - 64 with promass sensor P, A or M, manufactured by M/s Endress + Hauser Flowtec AG, Kagenstrabe 7 , 4153 Reinach BL 1, Switzerland and marketed in India by M/s Endress +Hauser ( India) Pvt. Ltd. , Excom House , Ground Floor , South Wing, 7 , Sakivihar Road, Andheri (E) , Mumbai , India and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 13 /2005/36;

The said model is a positive displacement Flow Meter working according to Coriolis principle having nominal diameter from 2mm to 150 mm with digital indication ( LCD type) . It is used for custody transfer for all kind of liquids and gases . The mass meter of this type may be used to measure all kinds of liquids with a density between 500kg/ m³ and 2000kg/ m³ and a temperature between-50° c and 200° c . These liquids must be free from gas bubbles and their solid portion must be less than 1 % . Mass meters of this type may also be used to measure fuel gases in the pressure range between 100 bar and 250 bar. The measuring instruments of the PROMASS 64M TYPE , in the high pressure version with the nominal diameters DN 8 , DN15 and DN25 may be used to measure fuel gases in the pressure range up to 350 bar. The maximum rate of mass flow range is from 2.0kg/ min . to 12000 kg/ min and minimum rate of flow range from 0.1 kg/min to 250 kg/ min . The minimum quantity measured range from 0.05 kg to 200 kg and value of scale interval range from 0.1g to 1000g.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 257) / 2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8739 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

नईदिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2005

का.आ. 2743.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स के. वी. रोजानी एण्डसन्स, 300-50, सरदार वल्लभभाई पटेल रोड, मुंबई-400 009 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण दोहरी रेंज ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " लिबर्टी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/ 38 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

MAK, CAP. 10 κα

उक्त मॉडल भार सेल आधारित दोहरी रेंज तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 304 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8740

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2743. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) , and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7) and sub - section (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating, non- automatic dual range (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class- III) and with brand name "LIBERTY " (hereinafter referred to as the model ), manufactured by M/ s . K.V. Rojani & Sons , 300-50 , Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Road , Mumbai -400 009 (Maharashtra) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/38;

MAX. CAP. 10 κα

LIBERTY

The said model is a load cell based dual range weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the Act , the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale inter- val (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg to 2g and with the number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same prin- ciple, design, and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 (304)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8741 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

का.आ. 2744.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाढ और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स के.वी. रोजानी एण्ड सन्स, 300-50 , सरदार वल्लभभाई पटेल रोड, मुंबई-400009 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " लिबर्टी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09/ 2005/ 39 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण -पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड़ ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा . तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 ( 304)/2003]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 220 G / S 8742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2744.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) , and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic (Plat- form type) weighing instrument with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "LIBERTY" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . K.V. Rojani & Sons , 300-50 , Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Road , Mumbai - 400009 (Maharashtra ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND 09/2005/39;

LIBERTY

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5000 kg.with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg to 2g and with the verification interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design, and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (304 )/ 2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8743 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

का.आ. 2745.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम , 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी , सराय रोहेल्ला, दिल्ली -110007 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " आर एक्स " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रेडी " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्तमॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2005 / 160 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विधुत चुम्बकीय प्रतिकर सिद्धान्त पर आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 251 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8744

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2745.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) , and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " RX " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III) and with brand name " RADY" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Electronic System , 84 , Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla, Delhi - 110 007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND 09/2005/160 ;

The said model is a electromagnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 g. It has a fare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 251 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8745 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2005

का.आ. 2746.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम , 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी, सराय रोहेल्ला, दिल्ली-110007 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " आरबी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रेडी " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्तमॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 / 161 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

RADY

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है। सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 251 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6, 2005/SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2746. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) , and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " RB " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "RADY" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Electronic System, 84 , Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla , Delhi - 110007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND 09/2005/161 ;

RADY

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weigh- ing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg.with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same prin- ciples, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (251)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8747 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 जुलाई, 2005

का.आ. 2747.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैससे इलैक्ट्रानिकसिस्टम , 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी, सराय रोहेल्ला, दिल्ली -110007 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एम बी " श्रृंखला केअंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाईप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/ 159 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

MATTLED

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 251 )/2004 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 20th July, 2005

S.O. 2747. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ), and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MB " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "Mattler" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Electronic System , 84, Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla, Delhi - 110007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND 09/2005/159 ;

MATILER

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2 g . It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weigh- ing result. The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50000 for' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same prin- ciple, design, and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (251 )/ 2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 8749 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

0-00-56

1519

सराय रजई

प्रतापगढ़ पट्टी

नईदिल्ली, 12 जुलाई , 2005

1507

0-01-92

0-06-77

1509

0-05-62

1510

0-06-24

1508

0-19-20

1499

का.आ. 2748.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में जगदीशपुर- हल्दिया पाइपलाइन परियोजना द्वारा प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0-14-40

1498

0-14-20

1497

0-04-22

1496

0-16-22

1493

0-21-12

1492

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

1494

0-01-44

0-22-93

1438

0-05-96

1489

0-05-90

1446

0-06-30

1445

0-05-75

1444

0-05-07

1443

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइलपाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

3-67-29

कुल

[फा. सं. एल-14014/62/03 - जी.पी. ] स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

NewDelhi , the 12th July, 2005

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री रामवतार पाल, सक्षम प्राधिकारी गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, बी-35 एवं 36 , सेक्टर-1 , नोएडा-201301 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला

तहसील गाँव

आर.ओ.यू.

सर्वे नं.

S.O. 2748. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from Jagdishpur- Haldia Pipeline Project in the State of Uttar Pradesh, a Pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India) Ltd.;

अर्जित करने के

लिए क्षेत्रफल

(हेक्टेयर में )

0-05-20

659

सराय रजई

प्रतापगढ़

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said Pipeline is propesed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

पट्टी

662

0-01-20

670

0-20-40

672

0-16-80

0-13-44

673

0-03-93

677

0-24-00

674

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

0-01-81

675

705

0-19-79

0-02-99

706

0-02-85

707

722

0-00-98

708

0-19-73

709

710

0-12-01

0-16-88

712

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writingto the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Ram Avtar Pal , Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, B -35 & 36, Sector - 1 , Noida-201301 (Uttar Pradesh.

0-41-41

718

2211 G1/05-6 8750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] SCHEDULE

District

करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

Tehsil Village Survey No.

Area tobe Acquired forROU (InHectare)

0-05-20

Saria Rajai 659

Patti

Pratapgarh

662

0-01-20

670

0-20-40

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री रामवतार पाल, सक्षम प्राधिकारी गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, बी-35 एवं 36 , सेक्टर -1 , नोएडा-201301 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा । 672

0-16-80

673

0-13-44

अनुसूची

677

0-03-93

जिला

सर्वे नं.

तहसील गाँव

आर.ओ.यू.

674

0-24-00

675

0-01-81

705

0-19-79

706

0-02-99

अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में) 707

0-02-85

722

708

0-00-98

365

0-07-20

जौनपुर वरचौली

जौनपुर

709

0-19-73

366

0-09-40 710

0-12-01

0-02-65

368

712

0-16-88

369

0-00-25 718

0-41-41

0-01-44

367

0-00-56

1519

0-20-94

कुल

1507

0-01-92

0-00-49

गौरा कलॉ

1509

0-06-77

0-15-95

1510

0-05-62

0-02-19

1508

0-06-24

0-01-28 1499

0-19-20

1498

0-14-40

0-12-72

1497

0-14-20

1496

0-04-22

0-01-34

1493

0-16-22

0-07-14

0-21-12

1492

0-09-56

0-01-44

1494

0-01-14

1438

0-22-93

47ए

1489

0-05-96

0-10-11

47बी

1446

0-05-90

0-21-32

0-06-30

1445

0-05-08

0-05-75

1444

375

0-00-93 1443

0-05-07

75बी

0-02-20

3-67-29

Total

0-10-58 [F. No. L- 14014/62/03-G.P. ]

0-00-98

254

SWAMI SINGH , Director

253

0-12-68

0-00-26 नई दिल्ली, 12 जुलाई , 2005

0-00-18

0-12-51

0-14-86

0-00-97

121

0-00-25

124

का.आ. 2749.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में जगदीशपुर - हल्दिया पाइपलाइन परियोजना द्वारा प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0-24-52

122

123

0-00-57

229

230

0-07-57

231

0-05-44 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

0-05-84

232

0-06-30

322/400

228

0-01-45 अतः , अब, किन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइलपाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग

227

0-01-26 1 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8751

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

224

जौनपुर जौनपुर गौरा कलॉ

5 2.

776

0-25-68

0-05-17 जौनपुर

223ए

0-16-49

223बी 0-00-78

323

0-00-55

0-12-91

324ए

0-19-15

325

328

0-08-06

329ए

330बी 0-06-25

330ए

0-07-27

345

0-00-98

0-01-11

346

0-00-48

347ए

347बी

0-16-66

2-98-58

कुल

सई नदी 0-14-40

हरिरामपुर

0-08-09

0-07-27

0-05-88

0-29-65

0-20-66

0-00-85

0-06-54

0-02-12

0-01-09

0-11-79

0-12-99

0-02-44

157

0-00-62

0-00-16

0-01-66

0-16-50

114ए

0-09-66

120

861

0-02-24

117ए

0-12-92

119

118

0-09-72

129

0-00-48

130

0-02-33

295

0-03-11

288

0-09-56

131

285

0-01-48

288

0-00-16

287

280

0-09-96

0-08-40

281ए

0-04-81

281बी

0-12-24

282ए

0-19-66

272

0-01-16

278/864

0-00-64

277

771

0-00-67

777

0-10-14

774बी

0-01-28

0-01-12

774ए

जौनपुर हरिरामपुर

0-00-74

784

0-02-36

785

786

0-08-70

787

0-01-29

775

822

0-00-22

788

0-04-16

789

0-04-02

;

0-07-06

821

820

0-05-58

0-00-60

860/894

842

0-19-59

844

0-01-46

841

0-08-51

850

0-01-33

840

0-08-30

856

0-11-74

855

0-01-60

857

4-02-23

कुल

खपरहा

0-03-60

13 (नाला)

0-07-32

0-00-69

0-20-46

0-04-14

0-02-72

0-09-68

0-18-70

0-01-20

0-01-94

978

979

0-01-94

1087

0-02-48

1086

0-00-58

1088

0-1939

1089ए

0-01-06

1089बी

0-02-84

1090

0-02-46

1093ए

0-05-99

1093बी

1092/1184 0-05-84

0-03-08

1092

0-06-57

1119

1126

1118

0-17-57

1120

0-06-26

1121

0-10-68

1122

0-14-38

1123

0-00-55

1125

0-09-95

1127

0-10-19

1128

0-00-21

1128

0-01-78

1129

0-00-44

1130

0-02-32

1132

0-06-90

1135

0-06-60

1136 8752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

1137

खपरहा

जौनपुर जौनपुर

जौनपुर

0-06-06

1139

0-00-55

1140बी

0-01-21

1146

0-03-47

1154

0-18-40

1153

0-01-62

1156

0-13-19

1152ए

1152बी

0-12-62

1151

9-03-79

1150बी

0-04-14

1149

0-00-43

1148

0-02-09

1157

1166ए

0-01-83

1167

0-07-35

1168ए

0-18-07

1169

1170

0-02-77

1171

3-10-09

कुल

भुवाकलाँ

0-47-42

0-15-09

0-89-73

0-01-52

122

0-06-20

123

0-00-27

124

0-10-96

125

0-00-38

121

0-00-61

134

0-10-20

135

136

0-18-86

138

0-00-52

139

0-04-66

141

0-01-21

119

0-02-81

140

144

0-24-06

145

0-18-42

143

148ए

0-11-91

174

0-13-09

173

0-00-75

275

0-00-18

274

0-02-09

276

0-25-51

278

279

171

0-30-23

280

281

283

0-08-06

285

0-07-47

284

0-22-46

312

0-15-55

313

321

0-15-71

{PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

0-01-51

322

जौनपुर भुवा कलाँ

0-16-50

323

0-01-02

324

326

0-14-60

325

4-41-88

कुल

0-02-41 रामनगर

442ए

0-11-74

441ए

0-17-82

440ए

0-04-71

439

440बी.

0-00-33

438

0-12-10

437ए

0-07-50

436ए

0-00-67

435

0-09-60

432

0-10-35

431

0-21-25

413

0-04-67

419

0-08-06

420

0-12-15

421ए

422ए

0-19-42

423ए

0-01-29

423बी

0-00-48

362

341

0-04-44

340

0-01-04

339

0-14-50

338

0-24-65

330

0-09-35

329

0-03-63

328

0-12-24

327

324

0-00-77

323

0-35-50

322

0-09-85

321

0-01-15

320

0-12-97

319

0-14-83

318

0-06-57

644

0-00-63

645

0-09-90

649

656

0-01-30

643

0-01-56

646

0-06-37

648

655

657

0-00-46

0-31-50

660

659

3-52-07

कुल

0-01-12

127

हीरापुर

0-08-30

126

0-00-36

128

0-02-30

135

0-03-89

134

0-00-81

135 8753

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5 2

0-00-30

138

जौनपुर जौनपुर हीरापुर

जौनपुर

0-23-98

133

142

0-17-77

143

144

0-05-18

146

0-65-06

कुल

0-0627

254

बनसफा

255

0-04-98

256

0-01-73

257

258

0-09-25

259

0-00-54

268

0-06-15

267

0-00-63

317

0-01-18

319

0-00-56

320

321

0-00-85

322

0-03-07

323

0-01-97

324

0-01-46

326

0-08-86

329

330

0-02-02

0-02-44

331

0-00-78

332

0-03-31

333

334

0-01-80

0-04-36

352

0-05-40

353

0-00-35

351

0-00-21

350

356

0-76-21

कुल

0-03-60

रामपुर

0-00-14

0-05-26

0-01-96

170

0-33-54

0-02-94

0-02-50

0-02-51

0-01-41

107

0-02-16

108

0-07-47

115

0-09-07

114

0-00-59

121

0-11-51

163

0-12-81

162

0-00-69

110

0-01-40

194

0-01-27

196

0-01-01

195

0-00-72

161

5 2

0-04-08

160

रामपुर

जौनपुर

0-04-08

159

0-07-61

156

0-00-79

347

0-38-92

259

0-00-11

260

0-00-54

277

0-03-47

253/655

0-01-32

252

0-01-20

200

0-00-15

251

0-02-64

250

0-00-33

248

0-08-98

247

0-07-09

282

0-09-02

283

0-18-79

286

0-07-34

287

0-01-94

295

0-04-64

292

0-01-45

288

0-06-24

285

2-33-90

कुल

0-01-50 गोपालपुर 37

0-18-42

0-04-02

0-14-50

0-06-80

34ए,

0-01-20

0-13-12

0-67-61

कुल

0-01-74

देहजुरी

0-07-39

0-04-32

0-03-16

0-28-30

0-03-28

117

0-36-49

116

0-03-61

115

0-03-60

114

0-03-87

131

0-25-56

133

132

0-03-64

114

169बी

163

0-18-88

168

167

0-00-55

166

0-00-26

155

0-02-59

173ए

0-09-78

154

0-08-12

153

0-02-31

152 8754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

150

0-03-69 जौनपुर जौनपुर देहजुरी

जौनपुर

151

0-09-35

414

225

229

0-02-30

0-12-01

415ए

415बी

0-02-93

117

0-09-39

418

0-03-86

652

0-04-35

651

0-31-90

650

0-15-24

653

662

0-27-15

663.

0-10-19

664

0-01-65

3-04-42

कुल

0-06-51

खानापट्टी 503

506

0-06-89

505

0-00-35

504

0-25-12

501

0-04-84

510

0-00-41

512

0-21-97

513

0-00-22

514

0-00-23

586

0-00-35

602

0-01-23

596

0-12-64

602/1288 0-00-24

597

0-06-79

600

0-01-63

599

0-05-09

598

0-04-41

593

604

0-00-49

605

0-08-09

606

0-13-64

607

0-16-36

608

0-02-90

609

0-11-48

1121

0-00-46

1120

0-06-81

1122बी

0-30-90

1122ए

1115

1088

0-34-68

1087

0-02-52

1086

0-00-45

0-32-48

1085ए

0-04-20

1131

1085बी 0-04-46

2-69-01

कुल

7बी

0-02-12

ताहीरपुर

0-00-52

0-11-21

0-00-72

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2

0-01-53 जौनपुर ताहीरपुर

292

0-02-55

311

0-00-46

312

0-01-51

313

0-00-11

325

324

0-86-77

0-08-33

328

372

0-01-59

400

401

0-04-71

398

0-01-71

371बी 0-16-31

405

0-02-40

369

407बी

551

0-03-01

426

0-00-43

550ए

0-14-71

427बी

0-14-05

427ए

0-06-10

424ए

0-01-07

424बी

0-08-60

428

0-02-91

429

0-03-03

403

0-02-14

402

0-52-20

0-00-38

404

399

0-04-80

437

0-03-04

430

434

0-08-08

435

0-02-24

433

0-02-37

432

0-03-10

551

0-10-98

366

0-00-16

542

0-20-15

543

0-04-05

545

0-15-36

544

0-05-32

560

0-01-98

561

0-14-46

562

0-01-80

3-59-64

कुल

हसनपुर

0-03-68

0-02-19

0-09-13

0-06-28

0-00-86

0-22-57

0-05-11

0-01-30

124

0-01-71

123

0-07-41

121

0-07-16 8755

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1 2

122

0-15-13 जौनपुर

जौनपुर जौनपुर हसनपुर

0-07-11

120ए

0-11-89

120बी

0-00-62

119बी

0-13-32

119ए

0-10-92

118ए

0-00-16

117बी

0-12-46

227

0-03-10

161

0-14-88

206

0-05-02

207

0-02-57

208

0-07-67

209

0-00-58

205

230

0-00-31

161

0-01-44

233

0-00-66

0-01-88

210बी

0-10-18

210ए

0-01-96

211

0-11-17

222

0-00-25

212

0-00-86

220

0-06-25

221

0-13-03

219

218

0-07-28

217

0-07-04

0-09-58

215

0-01-20

214/630

0-11-55

214

0-05-92

161 (नाला)

2-64-97

कुल

507

0-01-94 सदर शेखपुर

0-00-45

508

0-01-07

509

0-10-38

510

511

0-16-18

512

519

0-08-51

525

526

0-10-91

527

0-00-43

528

0-00-58

533

0-07-08

542

0-08-64

543

0-01-20

544

0-04-89

545

0-03-30

546

0-00-62

549

0-00-57

555

0-06-60

554

0-03-07

553

559

0-01-28

562

0-06-37

563

0-01-23

564

0-97-38

कुल

5 2

0-18-32

सदर

कपूरपुर

0-42-60

124

0-21-06

125

162

0-01-97

163

0-04-47

164

0-04-06

165

0-00-33

166

167

0-02-61

174

0-03-84

175

0-00-22

176

0-02-24

177

181

0-00-11

0-00-16

182

187

0-00-56

272

0-05-40

288

0-07-80

289

0-00-32

287

1-17-53

कुल

0-00-11

502

शेखपुरा

0-02-80

503

0-00-75

508

507

0-02-68

532

0-03-61

533

0-12-30

531

534

0-00-82

535

0-00-72

536

0-00-52

537

0-01-48

540

0-02-37

541

0-00-91

543

0-03-30

530

0-06-70

544

0-08-10

529

0-02-89

542

0-07-44

545

528

0-10-80

0-00-51

546

0-00-87

568

0-00-64

569

0-10-28

592

0-03-10

593

590

0-21-35

0-05-18

588

0-00-12

589

584

-01-25

0-06-16

585

0-03-37

619

0-03-54

583

0-02-19

621

0-01-87

620

622

0-11-53

0-02-87

623 8756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

624

सदर

0-05-12 जौनपुर

शेखपुरा

जौनपुर

635

0-05-30

625

0-06-38

626

0-00-85

0-00-42

632

631

627

0-17-78

678

0-06-39

682/736 0-00-76

681/733

681

0-06-84

685

0-00-65

686

0-10-89

680

691

0-14-20

692

0-03-03

703

0-00-65

704

0-20-99

708

0-05-96

709

0-22-47

711

715

0-00-53

693

712

0-01-68

716

0-21-11

726

0-52-80

725

714

0-00-48

729

0-04-80

3-55-76

कुल

0-06-29 खुन्सापुर

0-36-28

0-02-68

0-37-52

0-28-45

0-01-18

658

0-01-08

659

0-00-28

655

0-14-75

656

0-05-79

654

653

0-26-08

694

0-05-78

693

0-15-38

697/827 0-00-44

698

0-03-60

730

0-02-50

729

0-24-01

728

724

0-00-14

726

0-21-59

725

0-20-96

722

0-01-25

721

0-11-74

775

0-03-70

807

0-19-70

808

0-02-30

806

0-26-53

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2

812

सदर

0-03-79 खुन्सापुर

सईनदी

3-55-48

कुल

316

0-07-94 बैलसड़ी

0-07-94

कुल

0-01-75

177

मोमिनपुर खुर्द

165

0-23-02

166

0-00-51

167

0-12-51

168

169

170

171

0-14-12

173

0-00-59

174

175

176

0-00-67

198

201

202

226

0-03-85

223

0-07-90

224

0-05-20

221

0-03-03

219

0-00-39

217

0-02-37

216

0-18-02

235

0-00-57

236

0-00-71

264

265

0-05-31

279

0-00-87

0-01-57

280

281

0-06-22

282

0-07-69

283

0-10-63

266

0-01-14

267

0-00-61

268

0-00-32

272

284

0-00-22

285

0-00-28

286

0-00-51

287

0-00-41

288

0-00-35

289

0-00-63

290

0-00-44

291

0-00-47

292

0-00-51

293

0-00-16

294

0-08-14

295

0-03-54

296

0-01-92

1-57-77

कुल

0-04-36 मोमिनपुर कलॉ

0-01-40

143

0-01-80 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रামী 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

जौनपुर

सदर

141/538

मोमिनपुर कलॉ

जौनपुर

0-11-51

141

0-01-66

140

0-01-71

139

0-02-31

138

0-13-40

133

0-00-27

146

0-13-39

147

0-08-07

136

0-00-86

137

0-00-25

362

0-00-33

361

0-07-96

360

359

0-06-05

358

0-03-22

357

0-06-98

355

0-00-52

354

0-02-74

353

0-01-01

137

152

0-00-13

151

0-02-95

153

0-00-19

349

0-01-68

351

0-00-33

352

0-17-28

343

0-00-35

344

345

0-01-17

342

1-16-46

कुल

0-01-20

544

पूरा बषैला

542

0-04-14

543

0-05-67

545

552 0-01-03

0-02-08

551

0-02-36

550

0-01-48

549

0-00-96

548

0-01-35

547

0-00-59

546

0-15-29

557

0-28-11

556

0-00-44

556/803

0-00-54

564

0-00-33

564/804

0-09-83

566

0-07-93

565

567

0-00-92

0-01-81

568

0-09-68

570

0-00-17

571

0-00-78

572

0-00-69

569

0-07-55

638

0-10-05

639

0-00-46

640

2211 GI/05-7

8757

0-00-79

637

सदर पूरा बबैला

0-49-81

644

0-07-95

664

0-01-65

717

665

0-00-51

693/807

0-00-11

715

0-29-60

710

0-02-41

711

0-00-76

709

0-09-30

707

0-09-41

706

0-02-46

705

0-02-27

704

0-01-20

729

695

694

0-01-41

736

0-06-49

735

0-02-88

734

0-21-90

730

2-70-50

कुल

0-01-11 रामलहायपट्टी 149

240

0-02-88

227

226

225

230

0-05-27

239

0-05-16

238

0-03-55

237

236

235

0-01-16

233

0-14-43

231

0-13-54

232

218

0-02-89

322

0-08-83

323

0-18-44

324

0-01-11

325

0-00-96

340

0-03-76

341

0-00-53

342

0-00-69

359

0-06-77

202

0-05-23

201

0-01-39

200

0-05-53

206

207

0-11-64

191

0-01-97

189

0-11-07

188

375

0-00-87

136

0-12-92

129

0-10-60

135

0-22-06

131 8758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

1 सदर

0-02-07 जौनपुर

102

रामसहायपट्टी

जौनपुर

1-79-36

कुल

212

0-02-31 सतलपुर

211

0-09-95

219

0-02-74

218

0-02-59

217

0-01-06

216

0-00-56

215

0-00-51

214

0-00-28

213

220

0-09-77

280

0-06-35

281

0-01-74

290

0-00-56

0-08-26

289

288

279

0-00-26

278

277

0-15-87

276

0-16-97

275

0-00-57

270

0-00-31

266

0-00-13

274

0-07-48

271

272

0-05-62

273

389

0-00-74

390

0-15-07

391

0-04-94

392

0-12-58

394

0-00-53

444

0-00-98

445

0-00-53

447

446

0-00-59

455

0-01-54

456

457

0-13-02

471

0-00-95

483

0-26-13

481

0-02-16

482

0-07-98

484

0-01-52

679

0-06-01

680

0-03-74

697

698

0-00-33

700

0-14-44

701

0-06-82

702

0-01-91

703

0-09-97

704

0-09-91

706

0-12-40

709

0-01-07

711

0-00-59

710

0-12-34

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 सदर

712

0-06-95 सतलपुर

713

0-01-45

814

0-01-15

2-75-60

कुल

228

0-02-88 मडियाहूँ बेलगहन

227

0-11-74

0-02-12

226

225

0-53-67

223

0-02-77

222

0-00-75

950

0-00-52

221

0-08-40

219

0-02-01

220

0-02-32

0-45-43

215

168

0-10-03

167

0-00-66

425

0-02-36

216

0-00-43

386

0-01-41

387

0-21-42

417

421

0-11-49

422

0-04-08

423

0-03-75

424

0-21-80

441

0-00-82

427

0-15-23

440

0-04-03

0-47-59

428

432

135

0-02-40

2-81-64

कुल

अजोसी

0-02-40

168

0-05-88

170

615

0-00-56

616

0-18-52

0-16-07

621बी

620

0-00-94

657

0-00-36

0-01-65

622

623

0-09-40

624

644

0-12-60

0-03-57

645

643

0-02-59

648

0-02-09

0-03-87

649

0-07-22

649/1379

650

0-12-27

0-03-80

651

709

79/1315 0-00-43

713

0-10-58

710

0-09-86

711

0-04-91 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8759

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

1 1

712

0-01-28 जौनपुर जौनपुर मडियाहूँ अजीसी

720

0-01-10

731

0-04-02

732

0-03-41

0-05-07

729

0-03-37

727

0-00-48

726

0-00-68

725

0-00-75

724

723

0-04-90

722

515

0-03-50

0-12-01

512

511

0-00-83

581

0-00-76

482

0-21-20

580

483

0-08-08

484

0-00-25

485

0-00-34

0-06-24

463

0-00-88

462/1113

462

0-28-65

451

0-01-72

458

0-11-82

452

0-01-01

453

0-03-41

457

0-03-78

455

0-03-63

454

0-00-41

426

0-04-58

0-09-56

427

0-01-32

373

0-03-65

372

0-04-16

371

370

0-02-56

369

0-09-95

367

0-00-63

0.03-74

361

360

0-23-23

358

0-10-91

356

355

0-10-41

0-02-11

356/1385

0-01-29

354

0-01-82

353

3-63-82

कुल

0-01-13

वजीरपुर

0-14-80

0-00-63

0-04-96

13बी

0-01-77

0-01-60

0-01-22

0-01-53

0-13-37

0-07-13

0-01-61 मडियाहूँ वजीरपुर

0-15-05

0-13-70

0-01-19

0-08-30

0-17-95

0-00-11

71बी

0-02-36

0-01-28

109

0-04-58

107

0-00-97

106

0-11-12

101

0-26-00

100

0-08-65

0-01-74

1-63-19

कुल

0-08-23

172

मुहम्मदपुर

173

0-36-95

174

175

0-01-73

0-01-66

177

0-03-87

178

0-11-36

176

0-01-95

164

229

0-00-15

227

0-11-09

226

0-01-05

244

0-01-43

220

224

0-10-83

223

0-19-54

222

0-01-03

220

219

0-04-48

217

0-11-89

216

0-21-74

259

0-04-54

258

0-05-90

260

1-59-72

कुल

1484

गनापुर

0-00-42

1487

0-00-94

1488

0-01-58

1489

0-06-38

1490

1494

0-13-18

1492

0-04-65

1493

1521

0-07-84

1523

0-26-02

1524

1525

0-00-13

0-70-15

कुल

0-05-12

मोकलपुर

0-08-83

0-17-89

9 8760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

1 2

0-10-22

जौनपुर जौनपुर मडियाहूँ मोकलपुर

0-11-64

0-04-22

0-05-33

0-04-42

0-26-45

0-01-20

0-11-99

0-00-11

0-00-26

0-03-20

0-03-57

0-47-86

0-01-18

0-03-66

130

0-05-72

0-12-86

0-08-84

0-02-88

0-33-60

0-11-07

0-09-33

949

947

0-21-94

948

0-02-75

949

0-00-29

0-01-32

950

951

0-02-53

2-83-35

कुल

0-18-05

648

पीपरा

655

0-04-53

649

0-06-45

650

0-02-20

651

0-09-06

652

653

0-00-95

0-41-65

कुल

0-12-78

रतौली

0-18-17

0-14-40

0-03-13

27ए

0-01-43

0-02-36

0-00-92

0-01-27

33ए

0-20-13

0-00-19

0-16-11

0-00-56

0-00-77

0-07-92.

0-14-69

0-02-23

0-16-69

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

0-09-75

मडियाहूँ रतौली

0-00-82

105

0-28-86

114

121

0-03-74

122

0-00-77

123

0-13-49

138

0-06-65

137

0-01-94

136

0-24-45

125

0-01-20

101

2-25-99

कुल

0-07-79

कुम्भी

0-04-36

0-05-24

0-08-31

0-14-29

0-07-48

0-03-92

0-11-84

0-00-35

0-01-24

0-00-29

0-01-10

0-18-71

49ए

49बी

0-00-14

0-00-42

0-09-63

0-15-62

43ए

0-14-63

42ए

0-03-07

42बी

0-13-51

151

0-01-70

173बी

173ए

0-01-39

150

0-01-21

148

0-24-56

149

0-01-90

174

0-00-14

179

178ए

0-03-80

176

0-33-51

177

0-21-54

326ए

0-14-69

325

326बी

0-00-68

371

369ए

0-00-75

369बी

373

0-01-78

0-02-14

368ए

376

0-10-38

0-07-23

377

0-17-43

378

379

0-16-83

0-05-83

380ए भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

0-10-68 जौनपुर

381ए

कुम्भी

मडियाहूँ

जौनपुर

0-10-60

382

3-42-75

कुल

0-00-15

1744

औरेला

0-03-15

1746

0-13-16

1747

1748

1749

0-11-15

1753

0-00-77

1750

0-01-52

1752

0-01-62

1751

0-31-97

कुल

0-03-88

संतोषपुर

0-04-29

0-03-60

0-03-20

0-12-69

0-00-28

0-10-88

0-07-13

0-26-09

62/288

68/290 0-00-13

0-03-61

0-02-33

112/295

0-06-30

112

113/289

0-17-29

114

0-05-49

115

0-05-13

116

0-04-59

117

0-04-74

118

0-00-71

119

0-05-20

121

0-05-01

120

0-04-13

124

0-03-99

259

0-0941

260

260/293

0-01-41

261

0-00-24

262

1-52-49

कुल

0-00-86

रजमलपुर

0-14-10

0-02-13

0-03-76

0-04-29

0-02-26

0-01-20

0-19-26

100

0-08-96

101

0-03-46

104

106

0-02-20

103

8761

0-01-39

102

मडियाहूँ रजमलपुर

0-08-29

116

0-01-20

117

0-11-46

122

0-06-88

118

0-03-91

121

119

0-00-97

330

0-06-26

331

0-09-51

332

0-01-06

333

0-01-14

329

0-20-14

322

0-02-77

327

0-07-83

323

0-00-22

321

0-00-83

326

0-03-63

324

0-01-26

317

0-00-14

319

0-02-83

318

0-14-56

316

0-00-76

314

0-01-60

312

0-03-61

311

0-13-77

310

0-23-38

309

0-00-95

308

0-00-74

562

540

0-15-59

541

0-01-93

542

0-16-70

543

0-08-65

544

0-03-15

545

0-01-18

559

0-25-20

570

2-91-72

कुल

0-09-01

1286

पाली

0-00-71

1287

0-25-45

1288

0-03-78

1300

0-04-43

1295

0-01-53

1296

0-01-19

1297

0-00-66

1298

0-00-23

1299

0-09-50

1294

0-00-65

1302

0-03-51

1305

0-19-34

1306

0-26-68

1307

1283

1281

0-01-20

1310

0-06-02

1348

0-17-19

1350 8762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

1340

जौनपुर

0-00-18

पाली

मडियाहूँ

जौनपुर

1351

0-22-31

1356

0-22-40

1357/1562 0-00-69

1360

0-06-89

1360/1522 0-01-43

0-12-35

1360/1524

0-12-18

1451

1452

0-06-09

1446

0-01-20

1444

0-11-50

1445

0-00-28

1442

0-13-92

2-44-85

कुल

अहरौली 1

0-03-91

0-27-63

0-01-25

0-01-16

4/856

0-00-16

0-10-90

0-01-03

0-01-60

0-04-03

0-03-43

0-12-50

0-00-73

0-06-64

0-00-72

0-02-68

0-06-05

0-08-68

0-08-21

0-06-55

0-05-28

0-00-91

0-01-20

100

0-01-53

101

0-07-35

103

0-00-73

102

0-01-11

245

0-06-39

250

0-01-08

249

251

0-21-09

252

243

0-03-10

242

0-00-29

241

0-08-28

239

0-05-94

240

0-03-31

388

0-01-03

389

0-00-73

390

0-03-42

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

392

0-25-06 मडियाहूँ अहरौली

391

0-00-39

393

0-06-92

394

0-01-62

423

0-00-34

465

0-00-47

424

0-07-52

426

0-03-98

428

0-02-15

430

461

0-10-61

460

0-00-67

454

0-01-64

453

0-03-84

452

0-24-49

450

0-00-45

451

0-02-50

487

0-00-57

486

503

0-16-17

502

0-12-79

498

0-01-89

500

0-03-35

559

0-03-23

560

0-04-20

3-16-95

कुल

मझवट

149

0-10-38

148

0-03-38

147

0-00-16

150

0-01-81

151

0-01-47

152

0-13-78

156

159

0-10-95

160

0-10-18

161

0-10-13

164/271 0-00-54

162

0-02-08

164

0-02-34

163

0-01-45

189

0-08-28

192

191

0-10-48

190

0-29-41

183

194

0-00-55

195

0-00-59

200

0-04-08

201बी

0-05-73

0-14-56

201ए

204/265 0-01-57

204/269 0-02-45

0-09-12

202ए भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1 1

0-02-45

202बी

जौनपुर जौनपुर मडियाहूँ मझवट

0-00-65

221

0-16-86

0-02-08

241

245

0-00-46

247

253

0-12-20

0-00-53

254

0-00-62

255

256

0-23-13

252ए

252बी 0-03-09

0-06-08

258ए

2-23-86

कुल

0-07-67

248

देल्हूपुर

246

0-02-01

247

0-07-32

0-00-31

249

0-04-29

250

0-06-10

241

0-05-30

237

0-13-41

236

0-10-80

230

0-02-10

234

0-01-20

233

0-60-50

कुल

0-06-58

सदरपुर

0-10-61

0-10-77

0-00-26

0-00-75

0-08-68

24ए

24बी

0-04-10

0-06-82

0-12-57

0-14-10

0-03-97

0-00-85

0-00-83

0-08-39

0-02-64

0-01-44

0-10-79

0-02-12

0-04-76

0-00-24

0-01-12

1-21-97

कुल

8763

5 2

0-03-20

मडियाहूँ मंझनपुर

0-01-09

नेवादा

0-14-20

0-08-95

0-00-75

0-09-37

0-01-07

95बी

0-07-74

0-06-20

0-06-24

0-18-32

104बी

0-00-64

0-04-20

0-82-52

कुल

0-22-31

घमहापुर

0-09-36

0-32-93

0-05-12

0-37-81

0-08-66

0-08-06

100

0-05-99

101

0-03-26

102

0-04-74

104

0-00-34

105

0-01-39

106

1-40-34

कुल

0-34-12

चूरेमा

0-05-12

0-00-31

0-10-96

0-06-74

0-02-86

0-23-84

0-00-65

0-03-64

0-00-77

0-08-09

0-01-20

0-01-06

29बी

0-00-24

0-08-77

29ए

0-10-80

0-00-75

0-04-42

0-09-97

0-03-40

0-02-04

52 8764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

5 2

0-08-93 जौनपुर जौनपुर मडियाहूँ चूरेमा

0-00-41

0-33-18

113

115

0-13-20

रेलवे ट्रक

1-96-35

कुल

मनीपुर

0-03-85

149

150

0-16-89

0-08-90

151

360

0-00-47

0-09-85

361

362

0-09-51

0-12-56

364

370

0-00-65

375

0-01-29

374

0-12-81

373

0-00-45

0-11-91

394

0-29-42

396

0-03-46

395

0-07-05

398

466बी

0-01-67

0-22-90

466ए

464

0-00-78

463

467

0-16-42

0-16-22

402

403

0-02-61

404

0-16-47

516

458

0-06-13

457

0-06-60

0-07-65

518बी

0-11-32

518ए

519

0-05-88

525

0-06-74

0-17-39

530

0-00-67

527

529

0-04-64

532

536

0-01-88

535

0-03-51

534

0-01-10

533

0-09-56

2-91-14

कुल

149

0-08-09

कोल्हडा

0-04-17

150

0-03-74

148

154

155

0-08-02

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

159

0-01-10 मडियाहूँ कोल्हडा

0-02-38

147

0-04-91

146

0-01-83

139

145

0-04-71

144

0-08-72

0-01-25

161

0-04-80

184

0-09-01

185

0-37-35

186

1-00-68

कुल

0-01-12

415/421

जियरामऊ

0-08-04

415

0-10-59

413

0-21-60

417

0-06-40

418

0-01-88

414

413

412

0-03-84

0-00-86

410

408

0-10-73

0-12-31

407

404

0-48-02

403

0-50-85

466

0-06-60

483

0-01-18

496

0-02-98

489

0-59-57

2-46-61

कुल

0-02-36 हरिहरपुर 306

57बी

0-01-40

0-02-04

0-02-24

0-00-29

0-24-32

0-02-07

0-00-78

0-37-84

0-01-76

0-01-18

144

145

0-00-18

146

0-00-63

147

0-00-84

148

0-18-50

0-08-37

152

0-23-31

151

0-01-36

153

0-15-67

159

0-09-64

160

161

0-02-66

0-06-38

165

0-06-76

163 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1 1

0-01-34

368

जौनपुर जौनपुर मडियाहूँ हरिहरपुर

0-12-94

291

0-06-40

290

0-00-64

289

288

0-02-36

292

0-16-20

296

0-05-36

294

0-11-44

293

0-01-03

285

0-02-22

281

0-01-62

280

0-00-45

276

0-26-05

282

0-01-12

283

0-07-52

283/476

0-01-20

284

0-01-06

434

0-28-61

440

0-00-32

441

0-00-19

443

2-98-98

कुल

0-29-56

टेकारडीह 10

0-12-83

0-01-92

0-00-83

0-10-49

0-02-09

0-04-65

0-22-73

0-26-57

0-09-77

108

0-01-68

133

0-20-52

141

135

0-01-09

0-01-66

136

0-01-76

137

0-26-16

140

0-00-25

143

0-00-65

139

0-00-15

138

0-07-16

144

145

0-07-71

0-21-14

146

0-00-86

165

0-10-90

166

0-05-48

167/1276

0-05-78

167

0-06-26

168

169

0-03-22

0-00-57

170

0-07-20

231

2211 G1/05-8

8765

5 3

0-10-07

405

मड़ियाहूँ टेकारडीह

0-00-41

232

0-04-27

404

0-01-55

342

341

0-13-94

233

0-09-43

234

0-24-07

235

0-02-50

236

0-01-64

409

0-36-00

339

324

0-23-84

0-03-01

328

329

0-07-97

336

0-05-88

331

0-00-78

335

0-03-32

332

0-13-20

333

274

0-02-49

270

0-01-71

271

0-02-95

273

0-04-86

272

4-24-15

कुल

0-01-95

392

दुहावर

0-00-51

383

0-00-64

391

0-10-16

393

0-19-90

394

0-26-11

396

0-01-20

409

0-25-33

427

0-16-80

431

0-02-80

430

0-26-40

396

385

1-32-60

कुल

0-02-35 उसरॉव

0-02-21

0-02-32

0-03-62

41/166

0-00-25

0-06-29

101

0-04-10

0-08-01

0-04-24

100

0-07-49

0-06-07

0-01-05

0-06-68

104

0-01-19

120 8766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

1 जौनपुर

121

मडियाहूँ उसराँव

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

0-02-68 जौनपुर

119

0-00-62

118

0-15-31

105

0-00-81

115

0-00-46

116

0-03-91

114

0-18-78

125

0-03-72

126

111

0-00-78

146

0-07-80

147

0-02-93

144

0-15-63

145

0-17-18

143

0-03-20

142

0-11-22

182

0-02-40

140

0-02-92

183

0-00-93

186

0-23-65

184

0-08-50

577

0-29-48

570

0-26-53

569

0-03-67

567

0-24-75

566

0-02-25

540

0-02-12

565

0-00-21

541

0-22-68

542

0-02-73

545

0-00-65

548

0-02-68

547

0-04-20

546

0-00-57

461

0-14-78

462

463

0-02-33

464

0-03-13

463

0-00-71

465

0-15-19

466

0-01-30

499

0-00-14

498

0-04-04

467

0-02-35

469

0-35-23

476

0-12-71

449

440

448

0-26-37

0-08-15

466

447

0-20-34

385

0-11-96

384

0-25-35

477

0-03-56

383

379

0-20-06 मडियाहूँ उसराँव

378

0-00-13

5-40-53

कुल

इटियाबीर 106बी 0-07-48

105

0-03-52

104

0-12-82

103

0-04-26

0-01-91

102ए

102बी 0-05-19

0-26-29

101

100

0-00-66

0-15-99

0-28-10

0-00-69

0-17-08

0-23-34

0-00-44

0-04-04

0-01-06

0-01-20

1-54-06

कुल

0-02-67 डौड़ी

0-55-70

0-04-08

0-00-44

0-19-81

0-00-24

115

0-00-81

326

322

0-23-00

321

0-00-49

319

0-01-72

318

315

0-23-92

219

0-00-64

220

0-02-67

313

0-09-53

221

0-11-32

311

0-12-21

313

0-06-21

311

0-34-00

353

0-26-81

357

0-00-64

358

0-11-06

365

0-01-30

364

0-06-34

363

0-23-13

362

0-16-47

361

0-05-50

375

0-02-51

374

0-02-74 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

395/1239 0-01-12 जौनपुर

डौड़ी

मडियाहूँ

जौनपुर

531

0-05-32

0-17-94

530

525

0-41-34

526

0-09-39

0-12-75

527

528

0-18-31

537

0-01-20

565/1168 0-32-80

488

0-10-88

0-02-04

489/1178

486

0-16-83

0-01-57

489/1178

488

0-22-99

488/1232 0-09-78

487/1177 0-01-20

487

0-05-32

490

0-08-08

480

0-00-62

479

0-00-29

477

0-19-70

0-11-62

476

0-00-91

582

682

0-34-25

0-26-12

681

0-05-90

686

687

0-18-96

674

0-29-61

0-12-94

674/1184

मेढ़

688

0-01-40

671

0-10-91

0-05-36

703/1186

703

670

0-00-51

704

0-10-50

705

0-16-20

706

0-04-78

707

0-00-39

7-39-13

कुल

0-05-92

सादुल्लापुर 451

452

0-04-71

0-13-29

448

468

469

443

0-00-47

437बी 0-01-33

0-00-31

437ए

435

0-04-48

470

0-01-30

0-11-61

471

475

0-02-48

0-11-28

474ए

474बी 0-01-99

8767 2

5 3

0-06-83

476

मडियाहूँ सादुल्लपुर

478

0-01-45

484

0-01-60

0-09-87

482

0-09-09

483

0-04-77

481

0-15-96

488

490

0-00-11

491

0-01-44

504बी

0-22-70

504ए

0-02-29

594

598

597

0-07-77

0-00-17

505ए

595

0-11-21

592

0-10-21

593

0-00-57

542

0-16-15

541

0-10-14

544

0-03-42

0-01-76

545

546

0-02-58

0-02-28

547

0-01-15

549

0-01-59

548

0-00-29

540

0-02-80

550

0-04-17

551

0-02-91

552

0-02-91

553

0-02-82

554

555

0-02-46

0-02-17

556

0-01-78

557

558

0-03-24

559

0-02-65

539

2-47-72

कुल

0-02-10 नेवादा

261

259

0-19-52

0-03-42

260

262

0-06-52

0-00-11

263

0-00-75

281

0-03-53

289

0-03-85

288

0-00-16

286

0-24-08

285

0-01-10

283

0-00-69

292

0-09-52

343

0-07-65

344

0-00-36

350 8768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

353

--जौनपुर

नेवादा

मडियाहूँ

जौनपुर

354

0-02-30

356

355

0-10-20

197

0-01-20

282

0-00-72

0-97--84

कुल

परियाही 513

0-07-52

505

कलॉ

0-00-13

506

508

512

0-04-06

511

514

0-13-20

520

0-00-32

519

0-07-20

518

0-01-46

521

0-00-68

523

0-22-95

526

0-08-64

524

0-13-66

597

0-01-56

606

615

0-02-45

622

0-00-27

616

0-07-22

617

0-04-17

619

0-01-93

618

0-07-01

620

0-00-28

621

0-09-95

0-06-53

611ए

626

0-02-70

628

0-02-48

629

0-00-15

627

0-00-78

924

0-01-45

731

0-00-75

730

0-18-51

729

0-01-09

739

0-02-13

725

0-16-36

724

0-16-46

726

0-11-06

719

0-13-12

721

0-01-49

720

0-15-07

716

0-4-12

766

0-00-81

853

0-15-16

857

0-01-28

858

0-20-32

876

872

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 3

871

0-00-32 मडियाहूँ परियाही

870

कलॉ

869

0-00-36

868

0-01-20

859

860

0-02-44

861

0-03-12

867

0-05-12

862

0-02-80

865

0-02-68

866

0-03-20

863

0-402-56

864

0-07-51

844

0-05-04

849

0-01-81

907

0-03-10

910

0-01-80

911

0-02-88

843

912

923

0-08-32

922

0-00-85

921

0-11-37

925

0-10-80

920

0-06-40

926

931

0-01-40

0-12-00

933

0-04-80

932

0-12-00

919

924

0-02-60

930

3-87-31

कुल

0-11-08 परमल पट्टी 443

442

0-00-43

0-07-71

441

0-05-08

445

0-12-23

446बी

0-36-93

कुल

0-10-50 गदनपुर

0-12-82

0-16-80

0-02-16

0-07-64

0-02-13

100

0-15-42

105

0-03-04

110

109

101

102

0-05-91 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8769

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

106

0-02-91 जौनपुर मडियाहूँ गदनपुर

जौनपुर

107

0-01-87

103

104

0-09-42

123

0-04-98

124

0-14-84

122

0-11-50

128

0-28-57

130

0-00-47

132

0-06-85

133

0-06-27

0-00-12

134

137

0-21-52

138

136

0-01-13

1-87-14

कुल

0-08-94 केराकत धरावॅ

0-00-76

0-10-27

0-01-08

0-01-59

0-04-39

0-02-27

109

0-28-70

108

107

0-00-86

106

0-04-48

104

105

0-02-49

0-04-59

0-15-80

0-15-57

0-13-11

0-00-85

0-08-11

0-10-04

94बी

0-09-85

0-14-10

0-13-22

206

0-08-67

207

208

0-00-15

209

0-08-07

210

0-01-72

595/1031 0-00-77

593

0-02-27

0-18-40

594ए

590

0-19-93

602

603

0-02-39

0-25-60

604ए

634

0-01-03

0-00-36

633

5 केराकत धरावें

632

0-08-66

631

0-07-20

0-16-91

630ए

0-11-14

629ए

0-12-97

628ए

627

0-11-30

0-02-89

626

807

0-02-85

0-10-02

608

809

0-08-19

610बी

3-56-47

कुल

0-09-72

रामपुर सौड़ी

0-20-72

0-03-67

432

0-10-41

0-01-44

0-25-07

0-29-29

0-09-52

107

498

0-00-11

0-00-79

440

433

0-00-64

0-05-94

435

432/1967 0-00-58

434

0-17-62

0-15-90

429

0-02-72

423

422

0-01-85

420

0-11-01

0-06-70

421

412

0-31-13

413

0-05-66

0-01-20

410

406

0-03-23

0-00-50

512/1672

0-10-16

513

515

0-00-98

518

527

0-02-16

520

0-13-33

0-10-97

525

0-05-70

524

523

0-00-93

0-16-82

522

0-00-97

535

550

0-20-64

551

0-20-12

555

552

0-04-34

554

0-02-31

577

576 8770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15, 1927

1 जौनपुर

0-06-99 केराकत रामपुर सौड़री 578

जौनपुर

579

0-00-74

575

0-08-65

574

0-10-79

573

0-02-32

584

0-14-71

585

0-18-52

587

0-03-73

598

0-28-41

599

0-02-55

1095

0-09-68

0-05-07

1049

1048

0-06-58

1047

0-22-35

1051

0-01-57

1052

0-19-52

1057

0-09-69

1056

0-06-86

1058

0-09-94

1059

0-02-11

1062

0-22-05

1061

0-04-42

1010

0-11-92

997

0-01-40

1000

0-00-55

999

0-01-43

1006

0-02-04

996

0-38-01

986

0-16-48

984

0-18-25

982

0-01-16

981

0-07-35

980

0-05-29

970

0-40-80

969

0-01-37

6-90-01

कुल

501

0-18-89 असबरनपुर

502

0-35-30

491

0-09-62

528

557

0-04-88

556

0-16-32

555

0-14-67

554

0-07-57

559

0-00-21

729

628

0-07-58

630

0-02-87

631

0-25-11

641

0-00-75

722

0-13-35

723

0-12-30

725

0-01-25

724

0-15-02

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 2

736

केराकत असबरनपुर

737

0-33-46

733

829

0-00-82

828

0-03-64

830

0-09-22

831

0-05-16

832

0-01-45

834

0-12-99

833

0-02-59

835

0-13-16

839

0-01-19

840

0-02-81

838

0-01-80

837

0-10-09

841

842

0-01-10

874

0-03-52

875

0-00-23

876

0-10-83

877

0-07-93

873

0-02-22

872

0-05-64

978

0-00-25

698

0-00-74

3-24-56

कुल

432

करदहा

0-11-39

433

0-41-81

435

0-08-51

431

430

0-01-30

436

0-00-77

469

0-02-38

479

494

0-32-40

493

0-29-02

487

0-07-56

486

0-04-48

485

0-05-26

484

0-07-25

481

0-03-66

482

0-09-20

483

0-01-75

479/852 0-02-40

512

0-00-38

513

0-03-58

1-74-30

कुल

[फा. सं. एल-14014/62/03- जी. पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

1 New Delhi , the 12th July, 2005

Jaunpur S.O. 2749. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from Jagdishpur -Haldia Pipeline Project in the State of Uttar Pradesh , a Pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India) Ltd.;

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Ram Avtar Pal , Competent Authority, GAIL( India) Limited, B -35 & 36 , Sector - 1 , Noida- 201301 (UttarPradesh).

SCHEDULE

Area to be District Tehsil Village Survey

No.

Acquired

forROU

(InHectare)

0-07-20

365

Jaunpur Jaunpur Varchauli

366

0-09-40

368

0-02-65

369

0-00-25

367

0-01-44

Total

0-20-94

0-00-49 Gaura Kalan 12

0-15-95

0-02-19

0-01-28

0-12-72

0-01-34

0-07-14

0-09-56

0-01-14

47A

47B

0-10-11

0-21-32

0-05-08

0-00-93

375

0-02-20

75B

0-10-58 .

8771

5 3

0-00-98 Gaura Kalan 254

Jaunpur

0-12-68

253

0-00-26

0-00-18

0-12-51

0-14-86

0-00-97

121

0-00-25

124

0-24-52

122

0-00-57

123

229

0-07-57

230

0-05-44

231

0-05-84

232

0-06-30

322/400

0-01-45

228

0-01-26

227

0-05-17

224

0-16-49

223A

0-00-78

223B

0-00-55

323

0-12-91

324A

0-19-15

325

328

0-08-06

329A

0-06-25

330B

0-07-27

330A

345

0-00-98

346

0-01-11

0-00-48

347A

347B

0-16-66

2-98-58

Total

Harirampur Sai River 0-14-40

0-08-09

0-07-27

0-05-88

0-29-65

0-20-66

0-00-85

0-06-54

0-02-12

0-01-09

0-11-79

0-12-99

0-02-44

0-00-62

157

0-00-16

0-01-66

0-16-50

114A

0-09-66

120

861

0-02-24

117A

0-12-92

119

0-09-72

118

0-00-48

129

0-02-33

130 8772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

1 Jaunpur Jaunpur Harirampur 285

Jaunpur

288

0-03-11

131

0-09-56

285

0-01-48

288

0-00-16

287

280

0-09-96

281A

0-08-40

281B

0-04-81

282A

0-12-24

272

0-19-66

278/864 0-01-16

277

0-00-64

771

0-00-67

777

0-10-14

774B

0-01-28

774A

0-01-12

776

0-25-68

784

0-00-74

785

0-02-36

786

0-08-70

787

775

0-01-29

822

0-00-22

788

0-04-16

789

0-04-02

821

0-07-06

820

0-05-58

860/894

842

0-19-59

844

0-01-46

841

0-08-51

850

0-01-33

840

0-08-30

856

0-11-74

855

857

0-01-60

Total

4-02-23

Khaparaha 13 ( Nala ) 0-03-60

0-07-32

0-00-69

0-20-46

0-04-14

0-02-72

0-09-68

0-18-70

0-01-20

978

0-01-94

979

1087

0-01-94

1086

0-02-48

1088

0-00-58

1089A

0-1939

1089B

0-01-06

1090

0-02-84

1093A 0-02-46

1093B

0-05-99

0-05-84

1092/1184

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 2

5 Jaunpur

0-03-08 Khaparaha 1092

1119

0-06-57

1126

1118

1120

0-17-57

1121

0-06-26

1122

0-10-68

1123

0-14-38

1125

0-00-55

1127

0-09-95

1128A 0-10-19

1128B

0-00-21

1129

0-01-78

1130

0-00-44

1132

0.0232

1135

0-06-90

1136

0-06-60

1137

1139

0-06-06

1140B

0-00-55

1146

0-01-21

1154

0-03-47

1153

0-18-40

1156

0-01-62

1152A 0-13-19

1152B

1151

0-12-62

1150B

0-03-79

1149

0-04-14

0-00-43

1148

1157

0-02-09

1166A

1167

0-01-83

1168A 0-07-35

1169

0-18-07

1170

1171

0-02-77

Total 3-10-09 Bhuwa Kalan 3

0-47-42

0-15-09

0-89-73

122

0-01-52

123

0-06-20

124

0-00-27

125

0-10-96

121

0-00-38

134

0-00-61

135

0-10-20

136

138

0-18-86

139

0-00-52

141

0-04-66

119

0-01-21

140

0-02-81

144

145

0-24-06

143

0-18-42 8773 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

0-09-90

649

Ramnagar

Jaunpur

148A

Bhuwa Kalan

Jaunpur Jaunpur

656

0-01-30

0-11-94

174

643

0-13-09

173

0-01-56

646

0-00-75

275

0-06-37

648

0-00-18

274

0-00-46

655

0-02-09

276

0-31-50

657

0-25-51

278

660

279

659

271

52-07

0-30-23

280

Total

283

01-12

127

Hirapur

0-08-06

285

0-08-30

126

0-07-47

284

0-00-36

128

0-22-46

312

0-02-30

135

0-15-55

313

0-03-89

134

0-15-71

321

0-00-81

135

0-01-51

322

138

0-16-50

323

0-23-98

133

0-01-02

324

142

326

0-17-77

143

0-14-60

325

144

0-05-18

146

4-41-88

Total

0-65-06

Total

0-02-41

442A

Ramnagar

0-0627

0-11-74

Bansafa 254

441A

0-17-82

255

440A

0-04-98

0-04-71

256

349

0-01-73

257

0-0-50

440B

0-00-33

258

438

0-09-25

0-12-10

259

437A

0-07-50

0-00-54

268

436A

0-06-15

0-00-67

267

435

0-00-63

0-09-60

317

432

0-01-18

0-10-35

319

431

0-00-56

0-21-25

320

413

0-04-67

321

419

0-00-85

0-08-06

420

322

0-03-07

0-12-15

323

421A

0-01-97

324

422A

0-19-42

0-01-46 423A

326

0-01-29

0-08-86 423B

329

0-00-48

0-02-02 362

330

0-02-44

331

341

0-04-44

0-00-78 340

332

0-01-04

0-03-31 339

333

0-14-50

0-01-80 338

334

0-24-65

0-04-36 330

352

0-09-35

0-05-40 329

353

0-03-63

0-00-35 328

351

0-00-21

0-12-24

350

327

356

324

0-00-77

323

0-76-21

Total

0-35-50

322

0-03-60

Rampur

0-09-85

321

0-01-15

320

0-00-14

0-12-97

319

0-05-26

0-14-83

318

0-01-96

170

0-06-57

644

0-33-54

0-00-63

645

2211 G1/05-9 8774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

Jaunpur Jaunpur Rampur

Jaunpur

0-02-94

(0-02-50

0-02-51

0401-41

107

108

0-02-16

0-07-47

115

114

0-09-07

0-00-59

121

163

0-11-51

0-12-81

162

110

194

0-00-69

(0-01-27

196

0-01-40

195 0-01-01

0-00-72

161

160

159

0-04-08

0417-61

156

0-04-08

0-400-79

347

259

0-38-92

260 0-00-11

0-400-54

277

0403-47

253/655

252

0-01-32

200

0-01-20

0-00-15

251

250

0-02-64

0-40-33

248

247

0-07-09

282

283

0-09-02

286

0-18-79

287

10-07-34

295

0-01-94

292

288

0-01-45

0-04-04

285

0-06-24

Total 2-33-90

0-01-50 Gopalpur 37

0-18-42

0404-02

0-14-50

34A 0-06-80

0-01-20

0-08 :00

0-13-12

EOFOXFO

Total 0-67-61

0-01-74 Dehjuri

0-07-39

0-04-32

0-03-16

0-28-30

0-03-28

117

[ PART II- SLC . 3 (ii ) ]

5 2

116

(1-36-49 Jaunpur Dehjuri

115

114

0-03-61

0-403-87

131

0-03-61

133

0-25-56

132

114

( 0-403-04

169B

163

168

0-18-88

167

166

0-00-55

155

0-00-26

0-02-59

173A

154

(0-409-78

153 0-408-12

1.52

0-02-31

150

0-03-69

0-09-35

151

414

225

(1-X) ()

229

0402-30

0-12-01

415A

0-402-93

4158

417

0-00-39

418 10-03-06

652

0404-15

651

6-31-90

10-15-24

050

653

0-27-15

0-10-19

0-01-05

004

Total 3=104=42

503

Khanapatti

506

0-00-51

0-06-89

0-25-12

501

510

1F0F0

912

(1-21-97

(1-X) -22

513

514

(01-000-23

0-01-23

(0)=12-04

( 40-24

602/1208

62-9070

597

0-01-63

600

599

60FEFO

0-04-41

593

604

0.00.49

0-08-09

605

0-13-64

606

0-16-36

607

608

0-02-90

609

0-11-48 8775

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0-00-46 Jaunpur Jaunpur Khanapatti 1121

Jaunpur

0-06-81

1120

1122B

0-30-90

1122A

1115

0-34-68

1088

0-02-52

1087

0-00-45

1086

0-32-48

1085A

0-04-20

1131

0-04-46

1085B

2-69-01

Total

0-02-12

Tahirpur

0-00-52

0-11-21

0-00-72

0-01-53

0-02-55

292

0-00-46

311

0-01-51

312

0-00-11

313

325

0-86-77

324

0-08-33

328

0-01-59

372

400

0-04-71

401

0-01-71

398

371B

0-16-31

0-02-40

105

369

407B

0-03-01

551

0-00-43

426

0-14-71

550A

0-14-05

427B

0-06-10

427A

0-01-07

424A

0-08-60

424B

0-02-91

428

0-03-03

429

0-02-14

403

0-52-20

402

0-00-38

404

0-04-80

399

0-03-04

437

430

0-08-08

434

0-02-24

435

0-02-37

433

0-03-10

432

0-10-98

551

0-00-16

366

0-20-15

542

0-04-05

543

0-15-36

545

0-05-32

544

0-01-98

560

0-14-46

561

Tahirpur

Jaunpur

0-01-80

562

3-59-64

Total

Hasanpur

0-03-68

0-02-19

0-09-13

0-06-28

0-00-86

0-22-57

0-05-11

0-01-30

0-01-71

124

0-07-41

123

0-07-16

121

0-15-13

122

0-07-11

120A

0-11-89

120B

0-00-62

119B

0-13-32

119A

0-10-92

118A

0-00-16

117B

0-12-46

227

0-03-10

161

0-14-88

206

0-05-02

207

0-02-57

208

0-07-67

209

0-00-58

205

0-00-31

230

0-01-44

161

0-00-66

233

0-01-88

210B

0-10-18

210A

0-01-96

211

0-11-17

222

0-00-25

212

0-00-86

220

0-06-25

221

0-13-03

219

0-07-28

218

0-07-04

217

0-09-58

215

0-01-20

214/530

0-11-55

21 .

0-05-92

161 ( नाला)

2-64-97

Total

0-01-94

507

Sadar Shekhpur

0-00-45

508

0-01-07

509

0-10-38

510

511

0-16-18

512

519

525

0-08-51

0-00.0

526 8776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

1 Sadar

0-10-91

Jaunpur

Shekhpur 527

Jaunpur

528

0-00-43

533

0-00-58

542

0-07-08

543

0-08-64

544

0-01-20

545

0-04-89

546

0-03-30

549

0-00-62

555

0-00-57

554

553

0-03-07

0-06-60

559

562

0-01-28

563

0-06-37

564

0-01-23

0-97-38

Total

0-18-32 Kapoorpur 16

124

0-42-60

125

0-21-06

162

153

0-01-97

164

0-04-47

165

0-04-06

166

0-00-33

167

0-02-61

174

175

0-03-84

176

0-00-22

177

0-02-24

181

0-00-11

182

0-00-16

187

272

0-00-56

288

0-05-40

289

0-07-80

287

0-00-32

Total

1-17-53

0-00-11

Shekhpura 502

503

0-02-80

508

0-00-75

507

532

0-02-68

533

0-03-61

531

0-12-30

534

535

0-00-82

536

0-00-72

537

0-00-52

540

0-01-48

541

0-02-37

543

0-00-91

530

0-03-30

544

0-06-70

529

0-08-10

542

0-02-89

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( i) | 3

5 Sadar

0407-44

545

Shckhpura

528

0-10-80

546

0-400-51

568

569

0-00-64

0400-87

0-10-28

592

593

0403-10

590

0-21-35

588

589

0-00-12

0-05-18

584

0-401-25

585

0-06-16

619

0-03-37

583 0405-54

621

0-402-19

620

0401-87

622

0-11-53

623

0-402-87

624

0405-12

635

0-05-30

0-06-38

625

626

0-00-85

632

0-400-42

631

627

0-17-78

0-00405

678

0-06-39

682/736 0-00-76

681/733

681

0-06-84

685

0-00-65

686

0-10-89

680

0-0005

691

0-14-20

692

0-403-03

703

0-00-65

704

0-20-99

708

005-96

709

711

(0-22-47

715

0-00-53

693

712

716

0-401-68

0-21-11

726

0-52-80

725

714

0-00-48

729

0-04-80

Total

3-55-76

0-06-29 Kunsapur 57

0-36-28

0-37-52

0-02-68

0-28-45

0-01-18

658

0-01-08

659

0-00-28

655

0-14-75

656

0-05-79 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Sadar

Jaunpur Kunsapur 654

Jaunpur

0-26-08

653

0-05-78

694

0-15-38

693

697/827 0-00-44

698

0-03-60

730

0-02-50

729

0-24-01

728

724

0-00-14

726

0-21-59

725

0-20-96

0-01-25

722

721

0-11-74

0-03-70

T15

807

0-19-70

0-02-30

808

806

0-26-53

0-03-79

812

Sai River

3-55-48

Total

0-07-94 Belsari

316

0-07-94

Total

0-01-75 Mominpur 177

165

0-23-02 Khurd

166

0-00-51

0-12-51

167

168

169

170

0-14-12

171

0-00-59

173

174

175

0-00-67

176

198

201

202

226

0-03-85

0-07-90

223

0-05-20

224

0-03-03

221

0-00-39

219

0-02-37

217

216

0-18-02

0-00-57

235

0-00-71

236

264

0-05-31

265

0-00-87

279

0-01-57

280

0-06-22

281

282

0-07-69

0-10-63

283

0-01-14

266

267

0-00-61

0-00-32

268

8777

5 2

272

Sadar Mominpur

0-00-22 Khurd

284

0-00-28

285

286

0-00-51

0-00-41

287

0-00-35

288

0-00-63

289

0-00-44

290

0-00-47

291

0-00-51

292

0-00-16

293

0-08-14

294

0-03-54

295

0-01-92

296

1-57-77

Total

0-04-36 Mominpur 66

Kalan

0-01-80

0-01-40

143

141/538

0-11-51

141

0-01-66

140

139

0-01-71

0-02-31

138

0-13-40

133

0-00-27

146

147

0-13-39

0-08-07

136

0-00-86

137

0-00-25

362

0-00-33

361

0-07-96

360

359

358

0-03-22

0-06-05

357

0-06-98

355

0-00-52

354

0-02-74

353

0-01-01

137

152

0-00-13

151

0-02-55

153.

0-00-19

349

0-01-68

351

0-00-33

352

0-17-28

343

0-00-35

344

345

0-01-17

342

1-16-46

Total

0-01-20 Pura Bagela 544

0-00-405

542

0-04-14

543

0-05-67

545

0-01-03

552

0-02-08

551

0-02-36

550

0-01-48

549 8778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15, 1927

1 2

Sadar

0-00-96

Pura Bagela 548

Jaunpur

547

0-01-35

546

0-00-59

557

0-15-29

556

0-28-11

0-00-44

556/803

564

0-00-54

564/804 0-00-33

566

0-09-83

565

0-07-93

567

0-00-92

568

0-01-81

570

0-09-68

571

0-00-17

572

0-00-78

569

0-00-69

0-07-55

638

639

0-10-05

640

0-00-46

637

0-00-79

644

0.4981

664

0-07-95

717

0-01-65

665

693/807 0-00-51

715

0-00-11

710

0-29-60

711

0-02-41

709

0-00-76

707

0-09-30

706

0-09-41

705

0-02-46

704

0-02-27

0-01-20

729

695

694

736

0-01-41

735

0-06-49

734

0-02-88

730

0-21-90

2-70-50

Total

0-01-11

Ramsahai- 149

240

patti

227

0-02-88

226

225

230

239

0-05-27

238

0-05-16

237

0-03-55

236

235

233

0-01-16

231

0-14-43

232

0-13-54

218

322

0-02-89

0-08-83

323

[PART II - SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

0-18-44 Sadar Ramshaipatti 324

325

0-01-11

340

0-00-96

0-403-76

341

0-00-53

342

359

0-400-69

202

0-06-77

201

0415-23

200

0-01-39

0-405-53

206

207

( 100-100

0-11-64

191

189

001-97

188

0-11-07

375

0-00-87

136

0-12-92

129

135

0-10-60

131

0-22-06

102

0-02-07

Total

1-79-36

0-02-31 Satalpur 212

211

0-409-95

0-412-74

219

218

0-402-59

217

0-00-56

0-01-06

216

0-00-51

215

0-00-28

214

213

220

0-409-77

0-06-35

280

0-01-74

281

0-00-56

290

289

0-08-26

288

279

0-00-26

278

277

0-15-87

276

0-16-97

275

0-00-57

270

0-00-31

266

0-00-13

0-407-48

274

271

272

273

0-05-62

389

(0-4000-74

0-15-407

390

391

0-04-04

392

0-12-58

0-00-53

394

444

0-00-98

445

0-00-53

447

446

0-00-59

455

0-01-54

456

457

0-13-02 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1 2

471

0-00-95 Sadar

Jaunpur Satalpur

Jaunpur

0-26-13

483

0-02-16

481

482 0-07-98

0-01-52

484

679 0-06-01

0-03-74

680

697

0-00-33

698

700

0-14-44

701

702

0-06-82

0-01-91

703

0-09-97

704

0-09-91

0-12-40

706

0-01-07

709

0-00-59

711

710

0-12-34

712

0-06-95

0-401-45

713

0-01-15

814

2-75-60

Total

0-02-88

228

Mariahu Belgahan

227

0-11-74

0-02-12

226

0-53-67

225

0-02-77

221

0-00-75

222

0-00-52

950

221

0-02-01

219

0-02-32

220

0-45-43

215

0-10-03

168

167

425

0-02-36

216 0-00-41

(1-01-41

306

387

0-21-42

417

0-11-49

421

0-04-08

422

423

0-03-75

0-21-00

424

441

0-15-23

427

0-04-03

440

0-47-59

428

432

135

0-02-40

Total 3=81-64

0-02-40

160

Ajesi

0-05-88

170

0-00-56

615

0-18-52

616

0-16-07

621B

8779

5 2

620

0-00-94 Mariahu Ajosi

657

0-00-36

0-01-65

622

623

0-09-40

624

0-12-60

644

0-03-57

645

0-02-59

643

648

0-02-09

0-03-87

649

0-07-22

649/1379

0-12-27

650

651

0-403-80

709

0-00-43

79/1315

713

0-10-58

710

0-09-86

711

0-04-91

712

0-01-28

720

731

0-04-02

0-01-10

732

0-03-41

0-405-07

729

0403-37

727

726 0-00-18

725

0-00-68

0-000-75

724

723

722

0-03-50

0-04-90

515

512

0-12-01

511

0-000-83

0-00-76

482

0-21-20

580

0-400-25

0-00-34

485

(0-100-24

NIFOXFO

462/1113

0-28-69

402

0-01-72

451

0-11-82

458

192 001-01

0-0041

453

003-78

437

455

0-03-63

0-00-41

454

0-04-58

426

0-09-36

427

373

0-01-32

0-03-65

372

0-04-10

371

370

0-02-50

0-09-95

369

367

0-03-74

361

0-23-23

360

358

0-10-91 8780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

356

0-10-0 Jaunpur Jaunpur Marlahu

0-10-41

Ajosi (Contd.) 355

356/1385 0-02-11

354

0-01-29

353

0-01-82

Total

3-63-82

0-01-13

Wazeerpur 6

0-14-80

0-00-63

13B

0-04-96

0-01-77

0-01-60

0-01-22

0-01-53

0-13-37

0-07-13

0-01-61

0-15-05

0-13-70

0-01-19

0-08-30

0-17-95

0-00-11

71B

0-402-36

109

0-01-28

107

0-04-58

0-00-97

106

101

0-11-12

100

0-26-00

0-08-65

0-01-74

1-63-19

Total

0-08-23

Mohammad- 172

173

pur

0-36-95

174

175

0-01-73

177

0-01-66

178

0-03-87

0-11-36

176

164

0-01-95

229

227

0-00-15

226

0-11-09

0-01-05

244

220

0-01-43

224

223

0-10-83

0-19-54

222

220 0-01-03

219

217

0-04-48

216

0-11-89

259

0-21-74

258

0-04-54

260 0-405-90

Total

1-59-72

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 2

1484

Mariahu Ganapur

0-00-42

1487

1488

0-00-94

1489

0-01-58

0-06-38

1490

1494

1492

0-13-18

0-04-65

1493

1521

1523

0-07-84

0-26-02

1524

1525

0-00-13

Total 0-70-15

0-05-12 Mokalpur 5

0-08-83

0-17-89

0-10-22

0-11-64

0-04-22

0-05-33

0-04-42

0-26-45

0-01-20

0-11-99

0-00-11

0-00-26

0-03-20

0-403-57

0-47-86

0-01-18

130

0-03-66

0-05-72

0-12-86

0-08-84

0-02-88

0-33-60

0-11-07

949

0-09-33

947

0-21-94

0-402-75

948

0-00-29

949

950

0-401-32

951

0-02-53

2-83-35

Total

648

0-18-05 Pipra

655

0-404-53

649

0-06-45

650

651

0-02-20

0-09-06

652

653

0-00-95

0-41-65

Total

0-12-78 Rava

0-18-17

21 भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

0-14-40

Mariahu Ratauli

Jaunpur Jaunpur

0-03-13

27A

(Contd.)

0-01-43

0-02-36

0-00-92

0-01-27

33A

0-20-13

0-00-19

0-16-11

0-00-56

0-00-77

0-07-92

0-14-69

0-02-23

0-16-69

0-09-75

0-00-82

105

0-28-86

114

121

0-03-74

122

0-00-77

123

0-13-49

138

0-06-65

137

136

0-01-94

0-24-45

125

0-01-20

101

2-25-99

Total

0-07-79

Kumbhi

0-04-36

0-05-24

0-08-31

0-14-29

0-07-48

0-03-92

0-11-84

0-00-35

0-01-24

0-00-29

0-01-10

0-18-71

49A

49B

0-00-14

0-00-42

0-09-63

0-15-62

43A

0-14-63

42A

0-03-07

42B

0-13-51

151

0-01-70

173B

173A

0-01-39

150

0-01-21

148

0-24-56

149

174

0-01-90

0-00-14

179

178A

2211 GI/05-10

8781

5 3

0-03-80

176

Mariahu

0-33-51

177

Kumbhi (Contd.)

0-21-54

326A

0-14-69

325

0-00-68

326B

371

369A

0-00-75

369B

0-01-78

373

0-02-14

368A

376

-10-38

07-23

377

-17-43

378

0-16-83

379

0-05-83

380A

0-10-68

381A

0-10-60

382

3-42-75

Total

0-00-15

1744

Aurela

0-03-15

1746

1747

0-13-16

1748

1749

0-11-15

1753

0-00-77

1750

0-01-52

1752

0-01-62

1751

0-31-97

Total

0-03-88 Santoshpur 54

0-04-29

0-03-60

0-03-20

0-12-69

0-00-28

0-10-88

0-07-13

0-26-09

62/288

0-00-13

68/290

0-03-61

0-02-33

112/295

0-06-30

112

113/289

0-17-29

114

0-05-49

115

0-05-13

116

0-04-59

117

0-04-74

118

0-00-71

119

0-05-20

121

0-05-01

120

0-04-13

124

0-03-99

259

0-09-41

260

0-00-20

260/293

0-01-41

261

0-00-24

262

Total

1-52-49 8782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15. 1927.

0-00-86 Jaunpur

Jaunpur Mariahu Rajmalpur

0-14-10

0-02-13

0-03-76

0-04-29

0-02-26

0-01-20

0-19-26

100

101

0-08-96

104

0-03-46

106

103

0-02-20

102

0-01-39

116

0-08-29

117

0-01-20

0-11-46

122

118

0-06-88

121

0-03-91

119

330

0-00-97

0-06-26

331

332

0-09-51

333

0-01-06

0-01-14

329

322

0-20-14

327

0-02-77

323

0-07-83

321

0-00-22

326

0-00-83

324

0-03-63

317

0-01-26

319

0-00-14

0-02-83

318

316

0-14-56

0-00-76

314

312

0-01-60

311

0-03-61

0-13-77

310

309

0-23-38

308

0-00-95

562

0-00-74

540

541

0-15-59

542

0-01-93

0-16-70

543

544

0-08-65

545

0-03-15

559

0-01-18

570

0-25-20

2-91-72

Total

Pali

1286

0-09-01

0-00-71

1287

1288

0-25-45

1300

0-03-78

0-04-43

1295

1296

0-01-53

0-01-19

1297

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ü) ] 3

5 Mariahu Pali

1298

0-00-66

0-00-23

1299

(Contd.)

1294

0-09-50

1302

0-00-65

1305

0-03-51

1306

0-19-34

1307

0-26-68

1283

1281

1310

0-01-20

1348

0-06-02

1350

0-17-19

1340

0-00-18

0-22-31

1351

1356

0-22-40

0-00-69

1357/1562

0-06-89

1360

1360/1522 0-01-43

0-12-35

1360/1524

1451

0-12-18

1452

0-06-09

1446

0-01-20

1444

0-11-50

1445

0-00-28

1442

0-13-92

Total

2.4485

Ahrauli

0-03-91

0-27-63

0-01-25

0-01-16

4/856

0-00-16

0-10-90

0-01-03

0-01-60

0-04-03

0-03-43

0-12-50

0-00-73

0-06-64

0-00-72

0-02-68

0-06-05

0-08-68

0-02-21

0-06-55

0-05-28

0-00-91

0-01-20

0-01-53

100

101

0-07-35

103

0-00-73

102

0-01-11

245

0-06-39

250

0-01-08 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005 / श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

249

Mariahu Ahrauli

Jaunpur Jaunpur

0-21-09

251

(Contd.)

252

0-03-10

243

0-00-29

242

0-08-28

241

0-05-94

239

0-03-31

240

0-01-03

388

0-00-73

389

0-03-42

390

0-25-06

392

0-00-39

391

0-06-92

393

0-01-62

394

0-00-34

423

0-00-47

465

0-07-52

424

426

0-03-98

0-02-15

428

430

0-10-61

461

0-00-67

460

0-01-64

454

453

0-03-84

0-24-49

452

0-00-45

450

0-02-50

451

0-00-57

487

486

0-16-17

503

0-12-79

502

0-01-89

498

0-03-35

500

0-03-23

559

0-04-20

560

3-16-95

Total

0-10-38

149

Majuvat

0-03-38

148

0-00-16

147

0-01-81

150

0-01-47

151

0-13-78

152

156

0-10-95

159

0-10-18

160

0-10-13

161

0-00-54

164/271

0-02-08

162

0-02-34

164

0-01-45

163

0-08-28

189

192

0-10-48

191

8783

0-29-41

190

183

Mariahu Majuvat (Contd.)

0-00-55

194

0-00-59

195

0-04-08

200

0-05-73

201B

0-14-56

201A

0-01-57

204/265

204/269 0-02-45

0-09-12

202A

0-02-45

202B

0-00-65

221

0-16-86

0-02-08

241

245

0-00-46

247

0-12-20

253

0-00-53

254

0-00-62

255

256

0-23-13

252A

0-03-09

252B

0-06-08

258A

2-23-86

Total

0-07-67

248

Delhupur

0-02-01

246

0-07-32

247

0-00-31

249

0-04-29

250

0-06-10

241

0-05-30

237

0-13-41

236

0-10-80

230

0-02-10

234

0-01-20

233

0-60-50

Total

0-06-58

Sadaipur

0-10-61

0-10-77

0-00-26

0-00-75

0-08-68

244

24B

0-04-10

0-06-82

0-12-57

0-14-10

0-03-97

0-00-85

92 0-00-83

51 8784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

0-08-30 Jaunpur Mariahu Sadarpur

Jaunpur

0-02-64

0-01-44

0-10-79

0-02-12

0-04-76

0-00-24

0-01-12

Total

1-21-97

0-03-20 Majunpur 80

Newada

0-01-09

0-14-20

0-08-95

0-00-75

0-09-37

95B

0-01-07

0-07-74

0-06-20

0-06-24

104B

0-18-32

0-00-64

0-04-20

Total

0-82-52

0-22-31

0-09-36

0-32-93

0-05-12

0-37-81

0-08-66

100

0-08-06

101

0-05-99

102

0-03-26

104

0-04-74

105

0-00-34

106

0-01-39

Total

1-4034

Churema

0-34-12

0-05-12

0-00-31

0-10-96

0-06-74

0-402-86

0-23-84

0-00-65

0-03-64

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

0-00-77 Mariahu Churema

0-08-09

0-01-20

29B

0-01-06

0-00-24

0-08-77

29A

0-10-80

0-00-75

0-04-42

0-09-97

0-03-40

0-02-04

0-08-93

0-00-41

113

0-03-18

115

0-13-20

Railway

Track

Total

1-96-35

Manipur

149

0-03-85

150

0-16-89

151

0-08-90

360

0-00-47

361

0-09-85

362

0-09-51

364

0-12-56

370

375

0-01-29

0-00-65

374

0-12-81

373

0-00-45

394

0-11-91

396

0-29-42

395

0-03-46

398 0-07-05

466B

01-67

466A

0-22-90

0-00-78

464

463

0-16-42

467

402

0-16-22

403

0-02-61

404

0-16-47

516

458

0-06-13

0-06-60

457

518B

0-07-65

518A

0-11-32

519

0-05-88

525

0-06-74

530

0-17-39

527

0-00-67 8785 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0-00-18 529

0-04-64

Mariahu Hariharpur 145

Jaunpur

Mariahu Manipur

Jaunpur

0-00-63

146

532

0-00-84

147

536

0-01-88

0-18-50

148

0-03-51

535

0-08-37

152

534

0-01-10

0-23-31

151

0-09-56

533

0-01-36

153

2-91-14

Total

0-15-67

159

0-08-09

149

Kolhada

0-09-64

160

0-04-17

150

0-02-66

161

0-03-74

148

0-06-38

165

154

0-06-76

163

155

0-08-02

0-01-34

368

0-01-10

159

0-12-94

291

0-02-38

147

0-06-40

290

0-04-91

146

0-00-64

289

139

0-01-83

288

145

0-04-71

0-02-36

292

0-08-72

144

0-16-20

296

0-01-25

161

0-05-36

294

0-04-80

184

0-11-44

293

0-09-01

185

0-01-03

285

0-37-35

186

0-02-22

281

0-01-62

280

1-00-68

Total

0-00-45

276

0-01-12

415/421

Jiyaramau

0-26-05

282

0-08-04

415

0-01-12

283

0-10-59

413

0-07-52

283/476

0-21-60

417

0-01-20

284

0-06-40

418

0-01-16

434

0-01-88

414

0-28-61

440

413

0-00-32

441

0-03-84

412

443

0-00-19

0-00-86

410

408

2-98-98

0-10-73

Total

0-12-31

407

0-29-56

Tekardiha 10

0-48-02

404

0-12-83

403

0-50-85

0-01-92

0-06-60

466

0-01-18

483

0-00-83

0-02-98

496

0-10-49 489

0-59-57

0-02-09

2-46-61

0-04-65 Total

0-22-73

0-02-36

306

Hariharpur

0-26-57

57B

0-09-77

0-01-40

0-02-04

108

0-01-68

0-02-24

133

0-20-52

0-00-29

141

0-01-09

0-24-32

135

0-01-66

0-02-07

136

0-01-76

0-00-78

137

0-26-16

140

0-37-84

0-00-25

0-01-76

143

0-00-65

0-01-18

139

144 8786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

1 Mariahu Tekardiha 138

0-00-15 Jaunpur Jaunpur

0-07-16

144

145

0-07-71

0-21-14

146

0-00-86

165

166

0-10-90

0-05-48

167/1276

0-05-78

167

168

0-06-26

169

0-03-22

170

0-00-57

0-07-20

231

405

0-10-07

232

0-00-41

0-04-27

404

0-01-55

342

341

233

0-13-94

0-09-43

234

0-24-07

235

0-02-50

236

409

0-01-64

339

0-36-00

324

0-23-84

328

0-03-01

329

336

0-07-97

0-05-88

331

0-00-78

335

332

0-03-32

0-13-20

333

274

270

0-02-49

0-01-71

271

273

0-02-95

0-04-86

272

Total 4-24-15

0-01-95 Duhawar 392

0-00-51

383

0-00-64

391

0-10-16

393

394

0-19-90

396

0-26-11

0-01-20

409

0-25-33

427

0-16-80

431

430

0-02-80

0-26-40

396

385

Total

1-32-60

0-02-35 Usraon

0-02-21

0-02-32

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

0-03-62

41/166

Mariahu Usraon

0-00-25

0-06-29

101

0-04-10

0-08-01

0-04-24

100

0-07-49

0-06-07

0-01-05

0-06-68

104

0-01-19

120

0-02-68

121

0-00-62

119

0-15-31

118

105

0-00-81

115 0-00-46

116

0-03-91

0-18-78

114

0-403-72

125

126

0-00-78

111

146

0-07-80

0-02-93

147

0-15-63

144

0-17-18

145

0-03-20

143

142

0-11-22

0-02-40

182

0-02-92

140

0-00-93

183

0-23-65

186

0-08-50

184

577

0-29-48

0-26-53

570

0-03-67

569

567

0-24-75

0-02-25

566

540

0-02-12

565

0-00-21

0-22-68

541

542

0-02-73

0-00-65

545

548

0-02-68

0-04-20

547

0-00-57

546

0-14-78

461

462

0-02-33

463

464

0-03-13

463

0-00-71

0-15-19

465

466

0-01-30

499

0-00-14 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927-

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

498

0-04-04 Mariahu Usraon

Jaunpur Jaunpur

0-02-35

467

0-35-23

469

476

0-12-71

449

440

448

0-26-37

466

0-08-15

0-20-34

447

0-11-96

385

0-25-35

384

0-03-56

477

383

0-20-06

379

378

0-00-13

5-40-53

Total

106B

0-07-48 Itiabhir

105

0-03-52

0-12-82

104

103

0-04-26

102A

0-01-91

102B

0-05-19

0-26-29

101

0-00-66

100

0-15-99.

0-28-10

0-00-69

0-17-08

0-23-34

0-00-44

0-04-04

0-01-06

0-01-20

Total 1-54-06

0-02-67

Doudi

0-55-70

0-04-08

0-00-44

0-19-81

0-00-24

0-00-81

115

326

0-23-00

322

0-00-49

321

0-01-72

319

318

0-23-92

315

219

0-00-64

0-02-67

220

313

0-09-53

221

0-11-32

8787 2

0-12-21

311

Mariahu Doudi

0-06-21

313

311

0-34-00

0-26-81

353

0-00-64

357

358

0-11-06

365

0-01-30

364

0-06-34

0-23-13

363

362

0-16-47

361

0-05-50

375

0-02-51

374

0-02-74

395/1239 0-01-12

531

0-05-32

530

0-17-94

525

0-41-34

526

0-09-39

0-12-75

527

528

0-18-31

537

0-01-20

565/1168 0-32-80

0-10-88

488

489/1178 0-02-04

486

0-16-83 ...

489/1178 0-01-57

488

0-22-99

0-09-78

488/1232

0-01-20

487/1177

487

0-05-32

490

0-08-08

480

0-00-62

479

0-00-29

0-19-70

477

0-11-62

476

0-00-91

582

0-34-25-

682

0-26-12

681

0-05-90

686

0-18-96

687

0-29-61

674

0-12-94

674/1184,

Bund

0-01-40

688

671

0-10-91

0-05-36

703/1186

703

0-00-51

670

704

0-10-50

0-16-20

705

0-04-78

706

0-00-39

707

7-39-13

Total 8788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

0-05-92 Jaunpur

Sadullapur 451

Mariahu

Jaunpur

0-04-71

452

448

0-13-29

468

469

0-00-47

443

0-01-33

437B

437A

0-00-31

0-04-48

435

0-01-30

470

0-11-61

471

0-02-48

475

474A

0-11-28

474B

0-01-99

0-06-83

476

0-01-45

478

0-01-60

484

0-09-87

482

0-09-09

483

0-04-77

481

0-15-96

488

0-00-11

490

491

504B

0-01-44

0-22-70

504A

0-02-29

594

598

0-07-77

597

0-00-17

505A

0-11-21

595

0-10-21

592

0-00-57

593

0-16-15

542

0-10-14

541

0-03-42

544

0-01-76

545

0-02-58

546

0-02-28

547

0-01-15

549

0-01-59

548

0-00-29

540

0-02-80

550

0-04-17

551

0-02-91

552

0-02-91

553

0-02-82

554

0-02-46

555

0-02-17

556

0-01-78

557

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Sadullapur 558

Mariahu

0-03-24

559

0-02-65

539

2-47-72

Total

0-02-10

261

Nawada

259

0-19-52

0-03-12

260

0-06-52

262

0-00-11

263

0-00-75

281

0-03-53

289

0-03-85

288

0-00-16

286

0-24-08

285

0-01-10

283

0-00-69

292

0-09-52

343

0-07-65

344

0-00-36

350

353

0-02-30

354

356

355

0-10-20

0-01-20

197

0-00-72

282

0-97-84

Total

0-07-52 Pasiyahi 513

0-00-13

505

Kalan

506

508

0-04-06

512

511

0-13-20

514

0-00-32

520

0-07-20

519

0-01-46

518

0-00-68

521

523

0-22-95

0-08-64

526

0-13-66

524

0-01-56

597

606

0-02-45

615

0-00-27

622

0-07-22

616

0-04-17

617

0-01-93

619

0-07-01

618 8789

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

620

0-00-28 Jaunpur Jaunpur Mariahu Pasiyahi

0-09-95 Kalan

621

0-06-53

611A

626

0-02-70

628

0-02-48

629

0-00-15

0-00-78

627

0-01-45

924

0-00-75

731

730

0-18-51

729 0-01-09

739

0-02-13

0-16-36

725

0-16-46

724

0-11-06

726

719

0-13-12

0-01-49

721

0-15-07

720

0-04-12

716

766

0-00-81

853

0-15-16

857

0-01-28

0-20-32

858

876

872

0-00-32

871

870

869

0-00-36

868

0-01-20

859

0-02-44

860

861

0-03-12

867

0-05-12

862

0-02-80

865

0-02-68

866

0-03-20

0-02-56

863

0-07-51

864

0-05-04

844

0-01-81

849

0-03-10

907

0-01-80

910

0-02-88

911-

843

912

0-08-32

923

0-00-85

922

0-11-37

921

925

0-10-80 2211 G1/ 05-11

0-06-40 Mariahu Paseyahi 920

0-01-40

926

Kalan

0-12-00

931

933

0-04-80

0-12-00

932

919

0-02-60

924

930

3-87-31

Total

0-11-08 Parmal Patti 443

0-00-43

442

0-07-71

0-05-08

441

0-12-23

445

446B

0-36-93

Total

0-10-50 Gadanpur 55

0-12-82

0-16-80

0-02-16

0-07-64

0-02-13

0-15-42

100

0-03-04

105

110

109

101

0-05-91

102

0-02-91

106

107

0-01-87

103

0-09-42

104

0-04-98

123

0-14-84

124

122

0-11-50

0-28-57-

128

0-00-47

130

0-06-85

132

0-06-27

133

0-00-12

134

0-21-52

137

138

0-01-13

136

1-87-14

Total

0-08-94

Kerakat Dharav

0-00-76

0-10-27

0-01-08 8790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

1 1

0-01-59

Dharav

Kerakat

Jaunpur Jaunpur

0-04-39

0-02-27

109

0-28-70

108

0-00-86

107

0-04-48

106

104

0-02-49

105

0-04-59

0-15-80

0-15-57

0-13-11

0-00-85

0-08-11

0-10-04

94B

0-09-85

0-14-10

0-13-22

206

0-8-67

207

0-00-15

208

0-08-07

209

0-01-72

210

0-00-77

595/1031

0-02-27

593

0-18-40

594A

590

0-19-93

602

0-02-39

603

0-25-60

604A

0-01-03

634

0-00-36

633

0-8-66

632

0-07-20

631

0-16-91

630A

629A

0-11-14

0-12-97

628A

0-11-30

627

626

0-2-89

0-02-85

807

0-10-02

608

0-08-19

809

610B

3-56-47

Total

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ]

5 2

0-09-72 Kerakat Rampur

0-20-72 Soeri

00-03-67

432

0-10-41

0-01-44

0-25-07

0-29-29

0-09-52

107

0-00-11

498

0-00-79

440

0-00-64

433

435

0-05-94

432/1967 0-00-58

0-17-62

434

429

0-15-90

0-02-72

423

0-01-85

422

420

0-11-01

0-06-70

421

0-31-13

412

0-05-66

413

0-01-20

410

0-03-23

406

512/1672 0-00-50

0-10-16

513

515

518

0-00-98

0-02-16

527

0-13-33

520

0-10-97

525

0-05-70

524

523

0-00-93

0-16-82

522

535

0-00-97

550

0-20-64

551

0-20-12

555

552

0-04-34

0-02-31

554

577

576

578

0-06-99

579

0-00-74

0-8-65

575

0-10-79

574

0-02-32

573

0-14-71

584

0-18-52

585

0-03-73

587 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8791

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

598

0-28-41 Kerakat Rampur

Jaunpur

Jaunpur Soeri

599

0-02-55

0-09-68

1095

0-05-07

1049

1048

0-06-58

1047

0-22-35

1051

0-01-57

1052

0-19-52

0-09-69

1057

1056

0-06-86

1058

0-09-94

1059

0-0-11

1062

0-22-05

1061

0-0-44

1010

0-11-92

997

0-01-40

1000

0-00-55

999

0-01-43

1006

0-02-04

996

0-38-01

986

0-16-48

984

0-18-25

0-01-16

982

981

0-07-35

0-05-29

980

970

0-40-80

969

0-1-37

Total

6-90-01

0-18-89 Asbaranpur 501

502

0-35-30

491

0-09-62

528

557

0-04-88

556

0-16-32

555

.0-14-67

554

0-07-57

559

0-00-21

729

0-07-58

628

630

0-02-87

631

0-25-11

00-00-75

641

0-13-35

722

0-12-30

723

725

0-01-25

0-15-02

724

736

0-33-46 Kerakat Asbaranpur 737

733

0-00-82

829

0-03-64

828

830

0-09-22

0-05-16

831

832

0-01-45

834

0-12-99

0-02-59

833

835

0-13-16

839

0-01-19

840

0-02-81

838

0-01-80

837

0-10-09

841

842

0-01-10

0-03-52

874

875

0-07-23

876

0-10-83

0-07-93

877

873

0-402-22

0-05-64

872

0-00-25

978

0-00-74

698

3-24-56

Total

0-11-39 Kardaha 432

433

0-41-81

0-08-51

435

431

430

0-01-30

436

0-00-77

469

0-02-38

479

0-32-40

494

493

0-29-02

487

0-07-56

486

0-04-48

0-05-26

485

0-07-25

484

481

0-03-66

0-09-20

482

0-01-75

483

0-02-40

479/852

0-00-38

512

513

0-03-58

1-74-30

Total

[F -No- L- 14014/62/ 03 -G-P-]

SWAMI SINGH, Director 8792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

(PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

नईदिल्ली, 28 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2750.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम,1962 ( 1962 का 50) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का आ 2677 तारीख 19 अक्तूबर, 2004 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 23 अक्तूबर, 2004 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस् अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी (पुणे) से पकनी (सोलापुर) तक हजारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 05 मार्च, 2005 , को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधास ( 1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को * अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात , और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय *किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट्र भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करतै हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 8793

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग [ I- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूची

जिला: सांगली

तालुका: तासगांव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

1 निमणी

134

135

449

475

476 राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

67 8 5

00 49

0006 01

00.34 .00

10 60

00 23

गट नंबर 448 और

0004 21

477के बीच का नाला

477

497

496

479 } .

10 10

17:

13 53

गट नंबर 479 और

493के बीच का

00 02

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

493

492

491

490

489

488

487

486

485

00.07 77

00.08 34

00.03

00 03 68

00 03 83

07 61

00-14

00 14 48

गट नंबर 485 और

गाँव सीमा तांसगांव के

00 09

बीच में येरला नदी

कुल

02 71

गट नंबर 58 में

2 नेहरुनगर

03 75

राज्य मार्ग 75

गट नंबर 67 और 29.

00.46 70

18 22

00 00.36

00.01. 07 }

के बीच का नाला

00 02

गट नबर 29 और 30

00:01

के बीच का नाला

06 50

47 8794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका: तासगाव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

28 2 नेहरूनगर (निरंतर)

26 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं.

एयर

हेक्टर वर्ग मीटर 5

6 7

00 17 41 2

00 21 88

00 11 40

09 33

गट नंबर 26 में का

00 02 35

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

45 3 तासगांव

सर्वे नंबर 692 और

निमणी गाँव सीमा के

बीच में येरला नदी

692

968

961

693

694

695

687

686

642

643

644

646

622

621

620

619

618

सर्वे नंबर 618 और

611 के बीच का

मेटल्ड रोड

}

611

612

सर्वे नंबर 6.12 और

549 के बीच का

{

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

549

}

00 15 20

00 06 74 कुल 02 48 43

00 09 41

00 38 02

00 35 00

00 26 50

00 15 46

00 23 00

00 03 50

00 37 30

00 11 85

00 32 88

00 31 34

00 32

00 00 25

00 23 41

00 11 26

00 20 94

00 18 88

00 03 54

00 41 37

00 02 31

00 20 88 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

8795

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

कम सं.

540

3 तासगांव (निरंतर)

538

536

537

527

सर्वे नंबर 527 और )

441के बीच का

गाडी रस्ता

442

441

437

438

440

439

447

सर्वे नंबर 432 में नाला

432

451

452

450

459

462

सर्वे नंबर 459 में

का गाडी रस्ता

}

460

सर्वे नंबर 460 और

394के बीच में का

गाडी रस्ता

}

394

सर्वे नंबर 393 और

394 के बीच में का

राज्य मार्ग 10

{

393

371

392

सर्वे नंबर 392 और

386 के बीच में का

गाडी रस्ता

388

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

67 8

00 32 12

00 17 46

00 40 71

00 41 13

00 34 68

00 04 09

00 02 69

00 07 81

00 24

00 14

00 01

00 15 74

09 17

00 30

00 01 57

00 44 49

00 05 27

00 03 52

00 09

00 04 68

00 21 01

00 32

00 30 89

00 03 19

00 00 24 8796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कभ सं.

4 2

386

3 तासगांव (निरंतर)

384

382

381

321

सर्वे नंबर 321 में नाला

315

313

314

सर्वे नंबर 314 और

273 के बीच में का

ग्राम रस्ता

}

273

274

275

276

2.79

192

सर्वे नंबर 192 में

का गाडी रस्ता

सर्वे नंबर 192 और

193 के बीच में का

राज्य मार्ग नं . 136

193

सर्वे नंबर 193 और

185 के बीच में

का ड्रेन

185

चिंचणी

538

537

536

540

535

544

548

547

551

553 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

6 7 8

00 11 00

00 19 25

00 46 25

00 03 41

00 04

00 27 11

00 28

00 02

00 15 49

00 50 24

00 41 32

00 43 14

84 03

44 57

00 03

00 07 89

02 44

00 30 83 कुल 14 18 33

77 .

00 26

00 06 37

00 00 27

00 04 99

00 17 56

00 15 26

00 38 86

00 37 54

00 01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8797

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 4

552 चिचणी (निरंतर)

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं .

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

8 5

6 7

00 30

गट नंबर 314 और

552 और 577 के

बीच रस्ता

577

576

615

617

608

622

623

00 03 76 }

00 22

00 13 17

00 22 36

00 27

15 03

00 19 28

00 37 42

गट नंबर 623 और

658 के बीच में का

गाडी रस्ता

658

75 }

53 86 12

00 00 02 50

गट नंबर 658/2 और

654 के बीच का

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

654

764 }

00 21 94

00 11

गट नंबर 764 और

भैरेवाडी गाँव सीमा के

बीच में का डेन

गट नंबर 863 और

भैरेवाडी गाँव सीमा के

00. 08

बीच में कापुर नाला

863

849

850

864

05 12

00 00 12

00 08

गट नंबर 864 और

00 01

904 के बीच में प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 34

904

902

903

901

900

1002 2211 G1/05-12

}

02 21

00 09

00 13 75 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

8798

PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगाव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 1

1003 4 चिंचणी (निरंतर)

1044

1043

1009

1010

1042

1011

गट नबर 1011

में कनाल

1020

1021

1022

1025 राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

6 7 8

00 08

24 97

00 01

00 07

00 08

00 01 03 }

00 03

00 09 72

कुल

07 17 03

गाँव सीमा चिंचणी और

गट नंबर 227 के बीच

5 भैरेवाडी

की भूमि

227

228

229

215

214

211

212

00 03

01 82

00 11 51

18 17

00 11

00 13

00 31

गट नंबर 212 और

175 के बीच में

रस्ता

182

173

171

170

174

168 सावर्डे

255

254

253

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

00 01 96 का }

08 67

09 42

00 05 60

10 कुल

01 31

00 26

00 25

00 05 03

00 13 07

00 02 70

00 02

00 04 04

00 07 81

00 03 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8899

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 6 सावर्डे (निरंतर)

263

277

276

278

279 उप-खण्ड सं .

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

6 7 8

00 10 01

00 01 92

00 04 25

गट नंबर 279 और

280 के बीच में का

गाडी रस्ता

280

02 10

}

00 34 28

गट नंबर 280 और

00. 04 98

283 के बीच नाला

283

282

284

285

286

287

288 7 कौलगे

299

292

293

291

290

289

280

281

277

274

273

272

269

270

267

264

248

249

250

252

247 }

00 05

00 03 29

00 09

00 10 41

00 09

ات कुल 02 40 25

00 03

00 08 71

00 02 90

00 10 49

04 04

00 04 50

00 01 50

00 01 06

00 11

00 06 46

00 06. 02

00 04 85

00 14 69

00 01 53 3

00 12 86

गट नंबर 247/3

और 214 के बीच

00 02

का अस्फालटेड रस्ता

214

00 02 86 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

8800

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] =

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका: तासगांव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

219 7 कोलगे (निरंतर)

218

217

208

207

201

183

182

184

174

173

172

171

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

108

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं .

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

00 02

02 06

00 03 04

00 02 73

00 03

ब

00 16

00 16 47

00 01 25

00 23

00 06

00 08 16

00 06 72

00 06

06 17

00 05 16

00 02 31

00 07

00 02 31

00 21 57

00 09

00 13

11 34

'00

05 61

05 71

00 24 67

49 86 कुल

गट नंबर 339 से 366

8 वाघापुर

और कौलगे गाँव सीमा के

00 06 39

बीचमें का नाला

}

339 से 366

00 05 38

गट नंबर 339 से 366

और 369 के बीच में का

नाला

369

370

00 06

}

17 98

गट नं. 370/1 में

00 01

}

का मेटल्ड रस्ता

04 61

25 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8801

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

93 8 वाघापुर (निरंतर)

103

106

107

108

109

110

111

114

115

116

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 7 8 5

00 04

00 06

00 05

00 06 07

00 12 21

00 04

00 03 29

00 03

03 17

00 03 19

00 03

00 02

00 04

00 09

00 02

00 03 30

00 03

00 02 92

00 02

00 04 73

00 14 89

गट नं . 130 में का

00 03 48

मेटल्ड रस्ता

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

00 02

00 02 01

00 03

00 04 88

05 04

00 02

00 02 88

07 56

00 04 29

00 03

00 06 08

00 11 56

0257

कुल 8802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

[PART II -SEC . 3( ii)]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

157 9 खुजगांव

156

155

154

153

152

151

150

149

148

147

146

141

180

184

186 उप-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

8 5

6 7

00 03 80

00 06 37

00 06 43

00 05 65

00 06 12

00 03 11

00 03 55

00 02 93

00 03 09

00 02 93

00 02 53

00 05 29

00 04 57

00 00 49

00 -47 59

00 03 19

गट नं . 180 और 90

00 03 24

में का मेटल्ड रस्ता

93 }

00 45

ब

06 57

00 04 49

गट जंबर 93 में का

नाला

106

104

105 10 बस्तवडे

816

00 01 71 }

00 26 95

00 29 94

00 38 45

00 10 51

00 15 82 कुल

02 93 54

गट नं . 816 में का

00 03 57

मेटल्ड रस्ता

773

762

759

760

756

785

786

787

788

789

790

792 }

00 18 00

00 12 00

00 01 75

00 06 75

00 14 85

04.

00 05

00 07 25

00 03 67

00 03 50

25 कुल

01 14 09 8803

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांवद

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

290

सावलज

294

291

292

302

315

316

सर्वे नं. 316 में का

मेटल्ड रस्ता

। }

317

सर्वे नं. 317 में का

मेटल्ड रस्ता

सर्वे नंबर 121 और

317 के बीच का

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

}

122

120

121

सर्वे नंबर 120 और

104 के बीच की

अग्रणी नदी

}

104

सवे नं. 104 में का

गाडी रस्ता

}

107

108

110

सर्वे नंबर 110 और

56 के बीच का

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

{

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

00 27 00

62 16

43 30

00 27 79

00 13 50

00 19 80 234

00 23

05 33

00 03 01

00 53

00 13

00 11

5432 2

00 04

06 30

00 00 56

00 23

00 03 50 432113

03 50

00 21 98

00 02 38

00 04 17

00 35 00 8804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

सर्वे नं . 55 और 12

(निरंतर)

में का मेटल्ड रस्ता

सावलज

सर्वे नंबर 19 और

555 के बीच में प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 34

}

555

554

532

533

538

539

540

541

542

543

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7 8

00 01 18

16 01

00 12 92

00 12 25 13+ 2अ

05 40

1 ब + 2 ब

00 18

00 25 65 2

00 13 50 3

00 06 90

00 04

2ब

00 15

23/2

00 02

1 अ

00 14 19 3

00 07 57

00 59

13+4 + 3 + 5

28 80

1ब + 2+4अ

00 25

12/3+ 13 क+

00 17 02 4/6+5/ 5

5/3+11+4/5+17

2/5

1500 35

5/2+ 2+ 3+ 4/1+6+7+8+

03 25

23 1+2 00 31 00 3 + 4 00 23 18 1

00 06 50 2

00 06

00 06 50 4

00 06

00 14

00 10 50 7

00 10

कुल

11 00 01 8805

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005 / श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली तालुका : तासगाव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

1089 12 डोंगरसोनी

1088

1090

1087

1086

1084

1083

1082

1080

1078

1112

1109

1110

1111

1118

1106

1103

1123

1124

1133

1132

1130

1129

1128

1170

1169

1168

1166

1159

1165

1164

1163

105

106

107

108

109

110

112

113

159

160

158

164

165

182 2211G1/2005-13

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7

00 48

00 12

42 67

00 03

00 23

00 22

00 11

00 09

00 02

00 07

00 08

00 00 76

00 23

00 17 53

00 37

00 04

00 06 44

00 13

00 20

00 01

17 27

00 74 31

00 25

00 07

19 19

19 41

00 11 51

5.1

00 33

00 27

00 8806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( in ) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर उप-खण्ड सं.

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 2

6 7 8 12 डोंगरसोनी (निरंतर)

184

00 07 74 :

185

187

00 04 44

186

00 04 77

गट नं . 187 में का

00 04 25

मेटल्ड रस्ता

189

00 01 86

190

00 35 79

कुल 08 35 13 दहिवड़ी

467

00 22 50

455

00 11 18

456

00 22 78

444

00 06 18

457

00 15 51

00 12 99

458

459

00 00 42

441

00 13 00

440

00 10 66

439

00 11 55

436

00 00 32

438

00 21 41

433

00 08 09

कुल 01 56 59 14 जरही

823

00 05 92

कुल 90 05

[फा. सं. आर-31015/26/2004- ओ.आर ।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 28th July, 2005

S. O. 2750.-Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2677 , dated the 19th October , 2004, issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 23rd October, 2004, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying an extension pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project from Lone (Pune) to Pakni (Solapur) Via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited,

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 5th March, 2005 ;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decidedto acquire the right of user therein;

8807

भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule, appended to this notification, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration, in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

134 1 NIMANI

135

449

475

476

Area

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

Sub -Division No.

7 8 5

00 06 01

34 00

10 60

00 23

Nala in between

Gat No 448 & 477

477

497

496

479 }

10 10

17 09

02 73

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

479& 493

493

492

491

490

489

488

487.

486

485

07 77

08 34

03 83

00 07 61

}

Yerla River in

between Gat No 485

&V.B ofTasgaon

02 71 46 Total

SH - 75 in Gat

2 NEHRUNAGAR

No 58

00 03 75 }

00 46 70

00 32 56

00 18 22

36 10

Nala in between

Gat No 67 & 29

01 07

} 8808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005/ SRAVANA 15. 1927

Taluka TASGAON

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

District : SANGLI

Sr. Name of the

GatNo.

Survey No.

No. Village

29 2 NEHRUNAGAR (Contd.)

Nala in between GatNo 29 &30

Asphalted Road in

GatNo 26

5 3 TASGAON

Yerla River in between Survey No

692& V.B ofNimni

692

968

961

693

694

695

687

686

642

643

644

646

622

621

620

619

618

Metailed Road in between Survey No }

618& 611

611

612

Asphalted Road in betweenSurvey No }

612& 549

549

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 02 57

00 01 50 }

00 06 50

00 00

00 47 17

21 88

00 09 33

00 02 35 ' }

00 15 20

00 14 68

00 06 74 Total

02 48 43

00 09 41

00 38 02

00 35 00

00 26 50

00 15 46

00 23 00

00 03 50

00 37 30

00 11 85

00 32 88

00 31 34

00 32 79

00 00 02

00 00 25

00 23 41

00 11 26

00 20 94

00 18 88

00 03 54

00 41 37

00 22 26

00 02 31

00 20 88 8809

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II--खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District: SANGLI

Taluka: TASGAON

Sr. Name of the

GatNo.

Survey No.

No. Village

540

538

TASGAON (Contd.)

536

537

527

CartTrack in between Survey }

527 & 441

442

441

437

438

440

439

447

Nalain Survey }

No 432

432

451

452

450

459

462

CartTrack in

Survey No459 }

460

CartTrack in between Survey }

460& 394

394

SH - 10 in between

Survey No }

393& 394

393

371

392

}

CartTrack in between Survey NoNo 392& 386

388

Area

Sub-Division

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

No.

7 8

32 12

17 46

00 40 71

41 13

34 68

10 60

04 09

00 00 14

02 69

07 81

24 46

00 15 74

00 09 17

00 30 66

00 01 57

00 44 49

00 05

00 91

32 36

03 52

09 31

04 68

00 21 01

00 32 70

00 30 89

00 03 19

00 00 24 8810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

Taluka : TASGAON

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

District : SANGLI

Sr.Name of the

GatNo.

Survey No.

No. Village

4 3

386

TASGAON (Contd.)

384

382

381

321

Nala in Survey

No 321

}

315

313

314

VillageRoad in between Survey

No 314 & 273

}

273

274

275

276

279

192

}

CartTrack in Survey No 192

}

SH - 136 in between Survey No 192& 193

193

Drain in between SurveyNo 193& 185

185

4 CHINCHANI

538

537

536

540

535

544

548

547

551

553 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

00 11 00

00 08 00

00 19 25

00 00 60

00 46 25

00 03 41

00 04 96

00 27 11

00 28 59

00 02 80

00 15 49

00 50 24

00 41 32

00 43 14

00 84 03

00 44 57

00 00 64

00 03 43

00 07 89

00 02 44

00 30 83 Total

14 18 33

00 22 06

00 26 77

00 06 37

00 00 27

00 04 99

00 17 56

00 15 26

00 38 86

00 37 54

00 01 21 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

:भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8811 State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

552 4 CHINCHANI ( Contd . )

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Hectare Are

7 8 5

00 30

03 76

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

552& 577

577

576

615

617

608

622

623 }

00 22 76

00 13 17

00 22 36

27 31

15 03

00 19 28

00 37 42

02 75

CartTrack in

between Gat No

}

623& 658

658

00 53 86 1

00 02 50 2

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

658/2& 654

654

764

21 94

00 11 86

02 52

Drain in between

764 & V.B of

Bahirewadi

08 26

KapurNala in

between V.B of

Bahirewadi &

GatNo 863

863

849

850

864

00 35 83

00 05 12

00 00 12

00 08 89

MDR - 34 in

01 90

between Gat No

}

864& 904

904

902

903

901

900

1002

00 02 21

00 19

00 02 06

00 09 76

00 08

13 75

00 8812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

SANGLI

District :

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. Name of the No. Village

1003 4 CHINCHANI ( Contd . )

1044

1043

1009

1010

1042

1011

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 21 79

00 08 83

00 24 97

00 01 54

00 07 87

00 22 89

00 08 61

UnilinedCanalGat

No 1011

1020

1021

1022

1025 5 BAHIREWADI

00 01 03

00 05 92

00 03 12

00 09 72

00 32 49 Total

07 17 03

Area in between

00 03 15

V.B.Of Chinchani

& Gat No 227

227

228

229

215

214

211

212 }

00 01 82

00 11 51

00 18

00 11 02

00 13 49

00 31 82

00 01 96 {

Road in between

GatNo 212 & 175

182

173

171

170

174

168 6 SAWARDE

255

254

253

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

08 67

00 09 42

00 05 60

00 04 50 Total

01 31 33

00 26 70

00 25 27

00 05 03

00 13 07

00 02 70

00 02 50

00 05 04

00 04 04

00 07 81

00 03 90 8813

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 1

263 6 SAWARDE ( Contd.)

277

276

278

279

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

6 7 8 5

10 01

00 12 00

00 02 42

00 01 92

00 04 25

02 10

CartTrack in

between Gat No

279& 280

280 }

34 28

Nala in between

00 04 98 }

GatNo 280 & 283

283

282

284

285

286

287

288

299 7 KAULGE

292

293

291

290

289

280

281

277

274

273

272

269

270

267

264

248

249

250

252

247

00 28 09

00 06 51

00 05 43

00 03 29

00 10 41

00 09 28

02 40 25 Total

00 00 05

00 10 86

00 03 02

07 00

00 08 71

00 02 90

00 08 00

10 49

00 04 04

00 04 50

01 50

00 01 06

00 00 05

00 11 86

00 06 02

00 04 85

00 01 53 3

00 12 86

00 02 48 in }

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

247/3 & 214

214 2211G1 /2005-14

00 02 86 8814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

Taluka : TASGAON

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. Name of the No. Village

219 7 KAULGE ( Contd.)

218

217

208

207

201

183

182

184

174

173

172

171

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

108

53 8 VAGHAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

00 02 48

00 02 06

00 03 04

00 02 73

00 03 29 B

00 16 40

00 16 47

00 01 25

00 23 50

00 06 45

00 08 16

00 06 72

00 06 40

06 17

00 05 16

00 03 54

00 02 31

07 46

00 02 31

00 21 57

00 09 80

00 13 97

00 11 34

00 05 61

00 05 44

00 05 71

00 24 67 Total

03 49 86

Nala in between

00 06 39

V.B ofKaulge&

Gat No 339 to 366

339 to 366

05 38

00 06 44

Nala in between

339 to 366 & 369

369

370 1

00 17 98

Metalled Road in

00 01 48

Gat No 370/1

00 04 61

00 04 25 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

Taluka : TASGAON

8815

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

93 8 VAGHAPUR ( Contd .)

103

106

107

108

109

110

111

114

115

116

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

00 05 00

00 04 84

00 06 63

00 05 66

00 06 07

00 12 21

00 04 18

00 03 29

00 03 84

00 03 17

00 03 19

00 03 14

00 03 67

00 03 36

00 00 98

00 02 66

00 04 61

00 09 85

00 02 8

00 03 30

02 17

00 06 42

00 04 73

Metalled Road in

00 03 48 }

GatNo 130

130

131

132

133.

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

00 03 37

00 02 26

00 02 82

00 02 01

00 03 37

00 04 88

00 05 04

00 02 97

00 02 20

00 02 88

00 07 56

00 04 29

00 03 93

00 06 08

00 11 56 Total

02 57 88 8816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. Name of the No. Village

4 2

157 9 KHUJGAON

156

155

154

153

152

151

150

149

148

147

146

141

180

184

186

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

00 03 80

00 06 37

00 06 43

00 05 65

00 06 12

00 03 55

00 02 93

00 03 09

00 02 93

00 02 53

00 04 57

00 00 49

00 47 59

00 03 19

Metalled Road in

00 03 24

between Gat No

186& 90

45 26

00 02 96

00 06 57

00 04 49

00 01 71

Nala in Gat No 93

106

104

105

816 10 BASTAWADE

00 26 95

00 29 94

00 38 45

00 10 51

00 15 82 Total

02 93 54

00 25 00

00 03 57

Metalled Road in

GatNo 816

773

762

759

760

756

785

786

787

788

789

790

792

00 18 00

00 12 00

00 01 75

00 06 75

04 50

00 07 25

00 03 67

00 03 50

00 05 25

09 Total

14 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005 / श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग 11-- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8817 State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

290

11 SAWLAJ

294

291

292

302

315

316

}

Metalled Road in Survey No 316

317

}

Metalled Road in Survey No 317

}

Asphalted Road in between Survey No 121 & 3-17

122

120

121

}

AgranNadi in between Survey No No

120& 104

104

}

CartTrack in Survey No 104

107

108

110

}

Asphalted Road in between Survey No 110& 56 '

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

00 27

00 45 90

43 30

00 27 79

14 22

00 13

19 80

00 02 25

23 64

00 05 33

03 01

03 00

13 56

2020

00 5432

04 15

00 88888 00

10 00

03 50

432113

21 98

02 38

00 8818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

Taluka : TASGAON

[PART II--SEC . 3 (ii)]

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. Nameof the No. Village

4 11 SAWLAJ ( Contd . )

Metalled Road in between Survey No

55& 12

MDR - 34 in between Survey No }

19& 555

555

554

532

533

538

539

540

541

542

543

State: MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Divislon No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

00 01 18

00 16 01

00 ปบิ 07

00 09 00

00 12 92

00 12 25

1A+2A

05 40 1B +2B

00 13 88

00 18 62 1

00 25 65 2

00 13 50 3

00 06 90

00 04 39 2B

00 15 55

2A/ 2

02 70

00 14

19 3

00 07 57

00 59 07 1A+4B + 3 + 5 + 6 00 28 80 1B+2+4A 00 25 43 12/3+13B+4/

00 17 02 6+5/5 5/3+11 +4/5 +

00 19 80 12/5

5/2+2+3+4/1

00 35 80 +6+7+8 +1

00 62 00

00 03 25

00 36 23 1+2

00 31 00 3+4

00 23 18 1

00 06 50 2

00 06 50 3

00 06 50 4

00 06 50 5

00 14 45 6

00 10 50 7

00 10 25 Total

11 00 01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

Taluka : TASGAON

8819

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. Name of the No. Village

4 12 DONGAR SONI

1089

1088

1090

1087

1086

1084

1083

1082

1080

1078

1112

1109

1110

1111

1118

1106

1103

1123

1124

1133

1132

1130

1129

1128

1170

1169

1168

1166

1159

1165

1164

1163

105

106

107

108

109

110

112

113

159

160

158

164

165

182 State: MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 12 56

00 48 92

00 12 95

00 12 00

00 42 67

00 03 66

00 23 37

00 09 64

00 22 68

00 11 06

09 36

00 02 20

00 07 22

00 08 57

00 00 76

00 23 19

00 17 53

00 00 15

00 37 09

00 04 69

00 06 44

00 17 87

00 13 61

00 20 57

00 00 05

00 15 14

00 12 83

00 10 80

00 01 50

00 21 57

00 16 70

00 17 27

00 74 31

00 25 96

00 25 52

00 12 06

00 07 91

00 19 19

00 19 41

00 11 51

00 06 51

00 18 73

00 33 38

00 27 57

00 00 07

00 14 08 8820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6. 2005/ SRAVANA 15. 1927

PAKI II-Sit. 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sub - Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mt Sr.Name of the No. Village

7 8 1

184

12 DONGAR SONI ( Contd . )

185

15 66

00 04 44

187

186

04 77

Metalled Road in

00 04 25

Gat No 187

}

189

00 01 86

00 35 79

190

08 35 34

Total

13 DAHIVADI

467

00 22 50

455

00 11 18

456

00 22 78

444

00 06 18

457

00 15 51

458

12 99

00 42

459

441

00 13 00

440

00 10 66

439

00 11 55

436

00 00 32

438

00 21 41

433

08 09

01 56 59

Total

14 JARANDI

823

00 05 92

Total

[ No. R - 31015 /26/2004-O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 28 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2751.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी (पुणे) से पकनी (सोलापूर) तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से. उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हित है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को 8821

भारत का राजपत्रं अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

== उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एस. एन. कुन्देतकर, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना (लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मेगा सेंटर , मगरपटटा एम व एन विंग , हादापसर -411 028 (पुणे जिला), महाराष्ट्र को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सांगली

तालुका: तासगांव

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

134 निमणी

476

496

28 2 नेहरुनगर

688

3 तासगांव

689

548

540

538

437

438

460

380

381

283

193

608 4 चिंचणी

658

763

902

214 5 भैरेवाडी

212

181 2211GI/2005-15

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7

8 5

00 01

02 74

20 83

कुल

00 04

00 01

05 11

00 12 88 कुल

00 24

25 00

00 01

00 02

00 01

00 15

00 75

कुल

00 03

00 22

02 06

00 27 71 कुल

00 02

00 09 46

00 32

43.97

कुल 8822

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVAΝΑ 15, 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3tii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका : तासगांव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 सावडे

254

256

261

263

276

278

280

283

285

288 7 कौलगे

293

289

281

277

275

272

248

249

214

218

217

207

182

171

146

147

148

149

151

152

108

53 8

339से 366 वाघापुर

107

109 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं .

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7

8 5

00 14 08

00 01 63

00 01 36

00 00 78

00 01 68

00 00 73

00 02 02

00 02 71 कुल

00 25

00 00 83

00 03 10

00 07 20

00 01

00 01 04

00 01

00 02 63

00 01 64

00 00 37

00 00 96

00 01 32

00 01 50 कुल

00 29 00

00 01 91

00 02 26

00 02 94

00 01 55

00 00 51

00 00 78 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8823

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

जिला : सांगली तालुका : तासगांव

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर गाव का बाम

कम सं.

110 वाघापुर (निरंतर)

111

114

119

123

125

129

131

135

136

137

138

139

146

156 9 खुजगाव

155

152

180

186

104

105 10 बस्तवडे

759

760

815

814

813 राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

67 8 5

00 00 58

00 66

00 05 73

00 00 23

00 01 11

00 01 09

03 34

00 03

00 01 15

00 02 70

00 03 21

00 02

00 61

00 02 11

कुल

00 48 26

00 01

00 00

00 01

00 03 16

00 00 34

00 35

00 06

00 03

कुल

00 18 90

00 02 50

00 02 25

00 26 00

00 11 61

08 50

03 31

गट नंबर 813 में नाला

771

00 15

00 03 96

गट नंबर 771 और 770

के बीच में नाला

8824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 /SRAVAΝΑ 15 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

तालुका: तासगांव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 1

770 10 बस्तवडे (निरंतर)

768

767

766

765

764

761

294

11 सावलज

316

317

121

104

107

533

540

555

543

12 डोंगरसोनी

1089

1082

1106

1108

107 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं .

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर एयर

6 7

00 08

00 17

00 06 25

00 10 25

00 05

00 07 50

00 10 00

93 कुल

00 08

00 01 26 3

00 01 24 4

00 70 85

00 09 77

00 07 84 5

00 02 23 6

00 03 37 4

00 08 05 6+5

00 32 00

00 00 72

00 01 38 1अ+2अ 00 00 84

00 03 78 3

00 05 04 5+6

00 00 23 23/3 00 02 85 5

00 03 41 कुल

01 63 74

00 04 24

00 01 39

00 03 01 8825 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

जिला : सांगली

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र तालुका : तासगांव

क्षेत्रफल सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

उप-खण्ड सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

6 7 8

00 07

158

डोंगरसोनी (निरंतर)

00 02 48

165

कुल

00 22

[फा. सं. आर-31015/26/2004- ओ.आर- ।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 28th July, 2005

S. O. 2751. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni ( Pune) to Pakni (Solapur) via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.N. Kundetkar, Competent Authority, Mumbai -Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mega Center , Magarpatta M & N Wing , Hadapsar 411 028 ( Pune District) , Maharashtra .

8826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15..1927

SCHEDULE

District : SANGLI Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. Name of the No. Village

1 NIMANI

134

476

496

28 2 NEHRUNAGAR

5 3 TASGAON

688

689

548

540

538

437

438

460

380

381

283

193

4 CHINCHANI

608

658

763

902 5 BAHIREWADI

214

212

181 6 SAWARDE

254

256

261

263

[PART II-SEC , 3 (ii) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 16 25

00 01 84

00 02 74 Total

00 20 83

04 47

01 40

01 60

Total

00 12 88

00 24 25

00 25 00

00 01 14

00 01 05

00 00 60

00 00 36

00 02 30

00 01 30

00 15 46

00 00 30

00 03 43

Total

75 79

00 03 05

00 22 00 3

00 00 60

00 02 06

00 27 71 Total

00 02 45

00 09 46

00 32 06 Total

00 43 97

00 14 08

00 01 63

00 01 36

00 00 78 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8827 State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

276 6 SAWARDE ( Contd. )

278

280

283

285

288

293 7 KAULGE

289

281

277

275

272

248

249

214

218

217

207

182

171

146

147

148

149

151

152

108

53 8 VAGHAPUR

339 to 366

107

109

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

00 00 73

00 02 02

02 71

00 00 60

25 89

Total

00 00 83

00 03 10

00 07 20

01 55

01 00

00 01 04

00 00 30

00 80

00 00 70

00 30

00 01 60

00 00 60

00 00 30

00 02 63

00 01 64

00 00 37

00 00 96

00 00 22

00 01 32

01 50

00 29 00 Total

01 91

02 26

00 02 94

00 01 55

00 60

00 00 51

00 00 78 8828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

Taluka : TASGAON

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

District: SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. Name of the No. Village

4 8 VAGHAPUR (Contd. )

110

111

114

119

123

125

129

131

135

136

137

138

139.

146 9 KHUJGAON

156

155

152

180

186

104

105 10 BASTAWADE

759

760

815

814

813 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mt 5

00 00 58

00 00 66

00 00 30

00 05 73

00 00 23

00 01 11

00 01 09

00 03 34

00 03 48

00 01 15

00 02 70

00 03 21

00 02 49

00 00 61

00 02 11

00 08 92 Total

00 48 26

00 01 04

00 01 38

00 00 48

00 01 91

00 03 16

00 34

00 00 35

00 06 81

00 03 43 Total

00 18 90

00 02 50

00 02 25

00 26 00

00 11 61

00 08 50

Nala in Gat

No 813

771

00 03 31 }

00 15 50

00 03 96

Nala in between

GatNo771&770

} [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8829

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

Taluka : TASGAON

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. Nameof the No. Village

770 10 BASTAWADE ( Contd. )

708

767

766

765

764

761

294.

11 SAWLAJ

316

317

121

104

107

533

540

555

543

1089 12 DONGAR SONI

1082

1106

1108

107 2211GI/2005-16

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

6 7 8

00 17 80

00 06 25

00 10 25

00 07 50 Total

01 38 93

00 08 28

00 01 26 3

00 01 24 4

00 70 85

00 09 77

00 07 64 5

00 02 23 6

00 03 37 4

00 08 05 6+5

00 32 00

00 72

00 00 60

00 01 38

00 84

1A+2A

00 03 78 3

05 04 1A+4B+3 +5+6 00

00 00 23

00 02 85 2A/3

00 03 41 5

63 74

Total

00 04 24

00 01 39

00 03 01 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

8830

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SANGLI

Taluka : TASGAON

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sub-Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt Sr. Name ofthe No. Village

7 8

00 07

158

12 DONGAR SONI (Contd. )

00 02 48

165

Total

00 22 01

[No. R-31015/26/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secу.

नई दिल्ली, 28 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2752.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का आ 2725 तारीख 20 अक्तूबर, 2004, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 30 अक्तूबर, 2004 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोणी (पुणे) से पकनी (सोलापुर) तक हजारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 07 फरवरी, 2005, को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्वय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8831

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

अनुसूची तालूका : सांगोला

जिला: सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र उप-खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

73 1 पाचेगाँव बुद्रूक

88से 100

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

6 7 8

00 07 96

00 21 67

00 17 75

00 13 88 1

00 05 58 2

00 05 57

00 21 70

00 05 22

00 18 65

00 08

00 17 41

00 08 87

00 26 01

00 03 45

गट नंबर 88 से 100

में नाल?

102

104

105

206

204

00 23

) }

00 08 18

00 07 12

00 05 57

00 15 83

गट नंबर 204 और

179 के बीच में

00 03

मेटल्ड रास्ता

179

178

176

135

136

137

160

159

158

154

157

156

155

00 21

00 16

00 23

00 12 34

00 03

00 10 85

00 13 25

00 15

00 00 17

00 17 09

$0000

00 03 03

91 8832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका: सांगोला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

म सं.

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 5

गट नंबर 155 और

00 07 47

641 के बीच में

बुद्रूक (निरंतर)

1 पाचेगाँव

641

628

626

627

625

622

621

620

619

615

613

518

517

516

514

513

505

507

506

505

504

428

00 04

00 24

00 13

00 23

00 14

00 05 03

00 06

00 12

00 02

00 11

00 01

00 21

00 27 98

00 03 57

00 09 21

00 04 30 3

00 04

00 03

00 08

00 21

00 65

गट नंबर 428 के बीच

00 03

में मेटल्ड रास्ता

430

440

439

459

460

467

00 21

00 54 91

00 05

00 53

00 04 93

गट नंबर 460,467

और गाँव सीमा

00 17

कोंबडवाडी के बीच

में नाला

08 57 81 कुल 8833

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

गट नंबर 266,267

और गाँव सीमा पाचेगाँव

2 कोंबडवाडी

00 04 91

बुद्रूक के पास का नाला

266

267

268

269

270

272

271

274

275

276

286

00 07

00 04 41

00 06 13

00 06 91

00 16 42

00 06 52

00 17 63

00 14 03

00 25 93

00 28 72

01 39 03 कुल

गट नंबर 2952 और

3 कोले

2931 के बीच का

00 04

प्रमुख जिला मार्ग 78

गट नंबर 2910 और

2706 के बीच में वरार

देवी नाला

00 09 97

गट नंबर 2702 और

1957 के बीच में

00 02

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

1957

1964

1966

1967

00 40

00 14 32

00 07

00 20

गट नबर 1967 के

बीच में ड्रेन

गट नबर 1967 और

1794 के बीच का

00 02

मेटल्ड रास्ता

1794

1793

1790

00 01 02

00 02 28

00 07 92

सर्वे नंबर 1790 और

1789 के बीच का

नाला

00 03 66

"} 8834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] तालूका : सांगोला

राज्य : महासष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर कम सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 2

00 14 69 3कोले (निरंतर)

1789

1782

00 64 27

1784

00 15 35

30.

1787

00 28

1756

1753

00 18

1754

00 04 82

1751

00 06

1750

00 04

1749

00 03

1759

00 06 54

1748

00 02 34

1745

00 09 00

1747

00 01 06

1746

1704

00 67 30

गट नंबर 1704 और

1695 के बीच का

00 02

मेटल्ड रास्ता

1695

00 12 56

1691

00 63 76

1693

1680

00 22 82

1681

00 16 97

1679

00 28 61

1678

00 24 75

गट नंबर 1678 और

1676 के बीच का

00 05 99

मार्ग

प्रमुख जिला

गट नंबर 1678 और

1676 के बीच में

00 04

ड्रेन

1676

00 36 44

06 78 13

कुल

00 43 51 4 जुनोनी

00 11 93

00 53 23

00 01 17 8835

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

25 4 जुनानी (निरंतर)

132

135

134

142

143

क्षेत्रफल

मीटर

एयर वर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

7 8 5

00 00 71

00 22 38

80 50

00 28 28

00 30 30

00 20 50

00 03

84 3

01 35

00 12

00 37 00

00 09 76

16 00

00 17 51

00 01

गट नंबर 143 और

145 के बीच का

मेटल्ड रास्ता

गट नंबर 145 में मेटल्ड रास्ता

145

146

147

150

151

152

153

154

गट नंबर 154 और

22 }

00 04

00 11

00 03

00 05

00 10 28

00 18

00 23 31

00 36 38

20.5 के बीच में

नाला

205

206

207

208

209

210

215

216

217

218

00 01

}

05 22

00 04

00 03

00 06

00 22

00 13

00 17

00 16 8836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

तालूका: सांगोला

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

219 4 जुनोनी (निरंतर)

288

289

290

295

331

300

301

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

00 01 80

00 65 16

00 13 78

00 32 83

00 20 14

00 04 21

00 23

गट नंबर 300 और

329 के बीच में

329

326 5 करंडेवाडी

111

00 13 37

00 24 58

00 31 57

57 कुल 10 31

00 18 43

गट नंबर 111 के

00 03 30

बीच में मेटल्ड रास्ता

110 6 हातीद

659

658

660

665

663 }

83 कुल 00 21

00 35 54

00 21 44

00 60 15

00 02 03

00 00 18

गट नंबर 664 में

00 04

राज्य मार्ग 3

664

669

670

671

559

558

557

556

555

457

458

455

00 38 37

00 30 91

00 29 63

00 63

00 02 00

00 08 77

00 04 51

00 03 87

00 08

00 16 88 8837

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

गट नंबर 358 में नाला

6 हातीद (निरंतर)

358

359

366

00 13 57

11-

00 34 13

00 05 64

गट नंबर 366 और

12 के बीच का

212

00 03 54

मेटल्ड रास्ता

212

211

207

205

204

0003

00 24

00 28 91

00 07 61

गट नंबर 204 और

24 के बीच का

00 04 69

गाडी रास्ता

25 }

00 20 65

00 23

बट नंबर 25 और 56

के बीच का प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 62

61 }

00 10 52

00 30 45

00 15

गट नंबर 61 और 114

00 09

के बीच में नाला

114 *}

00 05

गट नंबर 114 और

03 56

113 के बीच की भूमि

113

111

109

106

107

105 {

00 22 64

00 49 74

00 09 57

00 33 18

00 03

00 20

गट नंबर 105. और गाँव )

सीमा मिसलवाडी के बीच

00 03

का गाडी रास्ता

2211GI/2005-17

07 38 77 कुल 8838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

तालूका: सांगोला

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 7 मिसालवाडी

314

315

197

198

199

200

201

202

195

194

193

192

139

138

137

136

135

140

141

142

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

723 8 राजुरी

810

727

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

00 27 43

00 55 00

00 09 45

00 03 26

00 02 15

00 02 59

00 03

00 08 00

00 03

00 05

00 07 02

00 05

00 10

00 12

00 05

00 06 24

00 03

00 04

00 02 80

00 03

00 01

00 05

00 24 31

00 11 98

02 52 13 कुल

00 97 37

00 13 07

00 69 92

805 से 809

00 06

गट नंबर 805 से

809 और 729 के

00 10

बीच का मेटल्ड रास्ता

729

730

736

00 13 23

00 34 68

00 51 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

तालूका : सांगोला

8839

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

734 8 राजुरी (निरंतर)

735

737

732

मीटर

एयर वर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

7 8

00 10 29

00 02 08

00 18 70

00 10 15

736से 738

00 12

गट नंबर 736 से

738 और 400 से

00 06 42

406 के बीच में नाला

400 से 406

00 .67

गट नंबर 375 से

00 04 19

399 में मेटल्ड रास्ता

375से 399

309

318

313

315

316

317

325

326

327

328

331

329

332

1257

335

336

337

338

339

340

344

345

258

253

252

249

248

247

00 11 41

00 17 41

00 14 39

00 08 52

00 10

00 06

00 05

00 12 08

00 12 69

00 05 46

00 01

00 10 00

00 07

00 01 96

00 02

00 14 14

00 17

06 54

0000

00 64

00 12 98-

00 11 03

00 10 63

00 8840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

सांगोला

तालूका

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

गट नंबर 247 और

225 के बीच में

8 राजुरी (निरंतर)

00 08 73

मेटल्ड रास्ता

225

226 9 वाटोबरे

626

624

623 10 निजामपुर

487

489

490

491

501

500

499

496

526

529

00 09 90

00 59

कुल

08 11 35

00 11 91

00 50

00 39 81 कुल 01 01 83

00 01 46

00 21 22

00 15 98

00 26 82

00 15 39

00 27 90

00 18 00

00 10 47

00 27

00 09 09

गट नंबर 529 और

553 के बीच में मेटल्ड

रास्ता

553

544

543

541

540

533

537

534

00 04

00 18 31

00 11 54

00 40

00 02 73

00 14 53

00 02 69

00 02 32

00 01 56 2

00 06 47

00 09 06

00 12 30

00 22 88

00 16 25

00 11 42

03 65 06 कुल भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8841

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

{ तालूका : सांगोला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

623 11 अकोला

619

618

604

605

602

588

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 5

00 17

00 75

00 13 40

00 18

00 31 33

00 44

गट नंबर 588 में

00 04

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

587

579

589

590

577

576

575

525

527

528

522

521

520

519

516

513

512

511

467

466

465

464(पै)

463

462(पै)

461

455

452

451

436 12 कडलास

437

439

00 26

00 10 81

00 29 30

00 25

00 01 89

00 43

00 44

00 12

42 87

00 13

00 15

00 08

07 92

00 09

00 02

00 33

00 17

00 04

00 02

00 02 41

02 82

00 06 81

00 07 61

00 01

06 80

कुल

00 03

00 25 41

00 8842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

तालूका: सांगोला

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 12कडलास (निरतर)

440

441

442

447

448

449

455

456

454

459

457

458

602

601

598

594

599

597

596

595पै

583

555

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 07

00 08

00 07 66

00 10 70

00 07 39

00 15 08

00 09 89

00 01 38

00 02 46

00 06 27 1

00 61 79

00 06

00 19 71

00 02 08

00 05 95

00 10 36

00 17 36

00 07 71

00 41 02

गट नंबर 555 में

00 02 82

मेटल्ड रास्ता

660

661

666

665

672

714

733

735

809

' }

08 00 10

00 01 00 00 26 25 00 04 81 00 48 34 00 47 46 00 36 34 00 14 89 01 15 99

गट नंबर 809 और

860 के बीच में राज्य

मार्ग 71

860 00 02 40 00 19 50

गट नंबर 860 और

867 के बीच में मेटल्ड

रास्ता 00 02 01 8843

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

867 12 कडलास (निरंतर)

861

862

866

865

क्षेत्रफल

एयर मीटर

वर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 5

00 00 37

30 24

00 16 86

00 18 99

00 17

गट नंबर 865 और

884 के बीच में मेटल्ड

रास्ता

884

885

890

889

888

927

900

925

924

923

922

921

920

919

914

गट नंबर 915 और.

00 02

00 21 09

00 17

00 15

00 19

00 21

00 06 93

00 04

00 06

00 01 96

00 04

00 06 28

00 07

00 12 47

00 02 19

1183 के बीच

में नाला

1182

1181

1180

00 06

00 16 91

00 05 22

00 05 64

गट नंबर 1208 में

00 03

मेटल्ड रास्ता

1208

1209

1210

1212

1213

1219

1221

1230

1231

1234 }

00 22

00 16 58

00 10 89

00 19

00 24

00 12 85

00 11 78

00 13 98

00 11

00 13 02 8844.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

तालूका : सांगोला

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 12 कडलास निरंतर)

1235

1236

1240

1241

1242

1243

1257

1256

1255-

1254

1253

1250

1251

1252

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

00 07

00 03

00 06 07

00 21

00 04

00 17

00 24 12

00 47

00 07 06

00 07

00 06 81

00 09 17

00 26 51

00 00 48

गट नंबर 1251 और

00 09 78

गाँव सीमा मेडशिंगी के

बीच में कोरडा नदी

कुल 12 59 75

गट नंबर 291 और

13 मेडशिंगी

गाँव सीमा कडलास के

00 09 84

बीच में कोरडा नदी

गट नबर 291 में

00 04 57

मेटल्ड रास्ता

306

309

310

311

313

317

318

328 }

00 84 25 2

00 42 53

00 11 19

00 12 21

00 24 44

00 19 30

00 24 09

00 38 54

00 15 04

गट नंबर 328 और

375 के बीच में

00 08

अपरुपा नदी

375

374

373

372

00 34 65

00 11 54

00 19 65

07 74

00 8845

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005 / श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

क्षेत्रफल

उप -खण्ड

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

मीटर

एयर वर्ग

हेक्टर

सं.

कम सं.

6 7

गट नंबर 372 और

00 03 13 मेडशिंगी (निरंतर)

411 के बीच में अस्फालटेड रास्ता

00 09

411

00 06 90

412

00 15

413

00 17

414

416

00 10

417

00 08

00 44

420

00 27 32

423

00 26

424

00 11 17

425

00 12 98

427

00 07 53

428

05 69

कुल

00 21

614

14 वाडेगाव

00 40

613/1, 613/2

14 43

608

00 15 19

607

00 00 14

602

18 50

599

00 16

582

00 50

578

00 06

568

00 07

567

566

00 09 81

00 13 91

556

00 07 56

555

00 18

506

गट नंबर 506 और

490 के बीच में राज्य

00 05 87

मार्ग 3

00 07 50

490

491

00 04 82

00 04 35

492

00 06 32

493

02 68

कुल

00 36 61

15 राजापुर

00 49 99

00 43 60 2211GI /2005-18 8846

ΤΗΕΑΖΕΤTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] सांगोला

तालूका :

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

उप -खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

सं.

6 7 8

गट नंबर 90 और 84)

के बीच में

15राजापुर (निरंतर)

00 02 05

मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 48 94

00 25 28

00 18 13

00 17 56

00 00 71

00 57 25

00 59 26

03 59 38

कुल

[फा. सं. आर-31015/19/2004-ओ.आरः ।॥ ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 28th July, 2005

S. O. 2752.-- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2725 , dated the 20th October , 2004, issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India dated the 30th October, 2004 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying an pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai- Pune Pipeline Extension Project from Loni (Pune) to Pakni (Solapur) via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 7th February, 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule, appended to this notification, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the and Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of the declaration, in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all mbrances .

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005 / श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8847

SCHEDULE

Taluka : SANGOLA

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 1

73 1 PACHEGAON

60 BUDRUK

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mt

8 5

00 07 96

00 21 67

00 17 75

00 13 88 1

00 05 58 2

00 05 57

00 21 70

00 05 22

00 18 65:

00 00 20

00 08 91

00 00 15

00 17 41

00 08 87

00 26 01

88 to 100

00 03

00 23 43

Nala intoGatNo

102

104

105

206

204

00 08 18

00 07 12

00 00 72

00 05 57

00 15 83

03 42

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

204 & 179

179

178

176

135

136

137

160

159

158

154

157

156

155

00 21 18

00 16 77

00 23 45

12 34

00 03 25

00. 10 85

00 13 25

00 15 68

00 00 17

00 17 09

00 03 03

00 10 91 8848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Taluka : SANGOLA

District: SOLAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Nameof the Village

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

6 7 8

Nala in between

1 PACHEGAON

GatNo

00 07 47

155 & 641

BUDRUK ( Contd.)

641

00 04 23

628

00 24 02

626

00 00 83

627

00 13 31

625

00 23 12

622

00 14 77

621

00 05 03

620

00 06 83

619

00 12 85

615

00 02 62

613

00 11 39

518

00 01 48

517

00 21 14

516

00 27 98

514

00 03 57

513

00 09 21

505

00 04 30

507

00 04 12

506

04 37

505

00 03 16

505

00 08 39

504

00 21 63

428

00 65 54

Metalled Road in

00 03 08

Gat No 428

430

00 21 34

440

00 54 91

439

00 00 31

459

00 05 42

460

00 53 72

467

00 04 93

00 17 47

Nala in between Gat No 460 & 467 & V.B of Kombadwadi

Total

08 57 81 8849 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sub -Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt Sr. No.

Name of the Village

7 8

2 KOMBADWADI

00 04 91

Nala adjacent to

V.B Pachegaon

Budruk & Gat No

266 & 267

00 10

266

07 32

267

04 41

268

00 06 13

269

00 06 91

270

00 16

272

00 06 52

271

17 63

274

00 14

275

00 25 93

276

28 72

286

39 03

Total

3 KOLE

MDR - 78 in

between Gat No

2952& 2931

00 09 97

Warar Devi Nala in

between Gat No

2910& 2706

02 74

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

}

2702& 1957

00 40 96

1957

00 14 32

1964

00 07 01

1966

20 92

1967

Drain in Gat No

00 00 83

1967

02 22

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

}

1967 & 1794

00 01 02

1794

00 02 28

1793

00 07 92

1790

Nala in between

00 03 66

GatNo

1790 & 1789

} 8850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II- SE 3 ( ii ) ] Taluka : SANGOLA

District : SOLAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Nameofthe Village

Hectare Are Sq.mt 1

1789

00 14 3 KOLE ( Contd. )

1782

00 64 27

1784

00 15 35

1787

00 28 30

1756

00 44 08

1753

00 18 80

1754

00 04 82

1751

00 06 81

1750

00 04 35

1749

00 03 37

1759

00 06 54

1748

00 02 34

1745

1747

00 01 06

1746

00 00 04

1704

00 67 30

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

00 02 32

1704 & 1695

1695

00 49 70

1691

00 12 56

1693

00 63 76

1680

00 22 82

1681

00 16 97

1679

00 28 61

1678

MDR - 78 in

between Gat No

00 05 99

1678& 1676

}

Drain in between

GatNo

00 04 83

1678& 1676

1676

00 36 44

Total

78 13 4 JUNONI

00 43 51

00 11 93

00 53 23

00 01 17 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

8851

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 1

25 4 JUNONI ( Contd.)

132

135

134

142

143

Metalled Road in between Gat No

143& 145

Metalled Road in

GatNo 145

145

146

147

150

151

152

153

154

Nala in between

GatNo

154 & 205

205

206

207

208

209

210

215

216

217

218 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mt

8 5

00 71

00 00 76

00 22 38

00 80 50

00 28 28

00 30 30

00 20 50

00 03 21 3

01 35. 84 4

12 00

00 37 00

00 09 76

00 16 00

00 17 51

00 01 65

04 73

00 11 45

00 11 66

00 03 59

00 05 74

00 10 28

00 18 04

00 23 31

00 36 38

00 01 14

}

00 46 99

00 05 22

00 04 60

03 49

06 85

00 22 72

00 10 65

00 13 83

17 07

16 75

00 8852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVAΝΑ 15 , 1927

Taluka: SANGOLA

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] State: MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 2

219 4 JUNONI ( Contd.)

288

289

290

295

331

300

301

Nala in between

GatNo

300& 329

329

326 5 KARANDEWADI

111

Metalled Road in

Gat No 111

110

659 6 HATID

658

660

665

663

SH - 3 in Gat No No}

664

669

670

671

559

558

557

556

555

457

458

455

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

01 80

65 16

00 13 78

00 32 83

00 20 14

00 04 21

23 13

00 00 05

13 37

}

00 24 58

00 31 57

Total

31 57

00 18 43

03 30

00 00 10

00 21 83 Total

00 35 54

00 21 44

00 60 15

00 02 03

00 18

04 05

38 37

00 30 91

00 29 63

00 63 93

00 02 00

00 08 77

00 04 51

00 03 87

08 62

00 00 94

00 00 99

00 16 88 8853 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Area

Sub-Division

Gat No.

Survey No.

No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Nameof the Village

7 8 1

Nala near Gat

00 13 57 6 HATID ( Contd. )

No 358

00 11 48

358

00 34 13

359

366

00 05 64

00 03 64

366& 212

Metalled Road in

ween Gat No

}

212

00 03 60

00 00 39

211

207

00 24 01

00 28 91

205

204

00 07 61

00 04 69

CartTrack in

between Gat No

204& 24

}

00 20

23 59

MDR - 62in

00 06 47

between Gat No

}

25& 56

10 52

00 30 45

00 15 39

00 09 30

145 }

Nala in between

Gat No 61 & 114

05 94

114

00 03 56

Area in between

GatNo114&113

00 22 64

113

111

00 49

00 09 57

109

106

00 33 18

107

00 03 07

105

00 20 71

03 51

CartTrack in

between Gat No

105 & V.B of

Misalwadi

07 38 77

Total

2211GI /2005-19 8854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 2

314 7 MISALWADI

315

197

198

199

200

201

202

195

194

193

192

139

138

137

136

135

140

141

142

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

723 8 RAJURI

810

727

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

00 27 43

00 55 00

00 09 45

00 03 26

00 02 15

02 59

00 03 11

00 08 00

00 03 54

05 55

07 02

00 05 26

00 10 07

10 34

12 62

14 51

00 00 04

00 05 12

06 24

00 03 41

00 00 22

03 60

00 04 50

02 80

00 03 07

00 01 68

05 26

24 31

00 11 98

02 52 13 Total

97 37

00 13 07

00 69

00 06 24

805 to 809

Metalled Road in

00 10 11

between Gat No

805 to 809 & 729

729

730

736 }}

00 13 23

00 34 68

00 51 16 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

8855 State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 2

734 8 RAJURI ( Contd.)

735

737

732

736 to 738

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt.

Hectare

00 10 29

02 08

00 18 70

00 10 15

12 14

Nala in between

06 42

Gat No 736 to 738

& 400 to 406

400 to 406

00 67 85

00 04 19

Metalled Road in

GatNo375to 399

00 11

375 to 399

309

318

313

315

316

317

325

326

327

328

331

329

332

1257

335

336

337

338

339

340

344

345

258

253

252

249

248

247

00 17 41

14 39

00 08 52

00 10 68

10 00

06 03

00 06 18

05 79

00 12 08

00 12 69

05 46

00 01 00

00 00 08

00 10 00

07 72

04 00

00 01 96

00 02 39

14 14

17 52

00 06 54

00 00 12

64 75

00 12 98

00 11 03

00 14 47

00 10 63

00 05 8856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

Taluka : SANGOLA

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Gr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

7 8

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

8 RAJURI ( Contd.)

08 73

247 & 225

225

226

626 9 WATAMBRE

624

623 10 NIJAMPUR

487

489

490

491

501

500

499

496

526

529

00 09 90

00 59 84 Total

08 11 35

00 11 91

00 39 81 Total

01 01 83

00 01 46

00 21 22

00 15 98

00 26 82

00 15 39

27 90

00 18 00

00 10 47

00 27 14

00 09 09

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

04 64

529& 553

553

544

543

541

540

533

537

534

00 18 31

00 14 29

00 11 54

00 40 50

00 02 73

14 53

00 02 69

00 02 32

00 01 56

06 47

00 09 06

00 12 30

00 22 88

00 16 25

00 11 42

03 65 06 Total भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8857 State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Sr.

GatNo.

Survey No.

No.

Nameof the Village

623 11 AKOLA

619

618

604

605

602

588

Asphalted Road in Gat No 588

587

579

589

590

577

576

575

525

527

528

522

521

520

519

516

513

512

511

467

466

465

464(P)

463

462(P)

461

455

452

451

436 12 KADLAS

437

439

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

00 69

00 17 99

00 75 35

00 13 40

00 18 32

00 31 33

00 44

04 25

in}

26 37

00 10 81

29 30

20 00

00 25 11

00 01 وع

43 82

00 12 25

42 87

00 09 40

00 13 05

15 12

00 08 93

07 92

00 09 91

00 02 87

00 02 66

00 33 82

00 17 42

00 04 92

00 02 03

02 41

00 02 82

00 06 81

00 07 61

00 01 46

00 00 45

06 80 24 Total

00 03 97

00 14 8858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sub-Division No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Nameof the Village

7 8 3

440

00 07 39 12 KADLAS ( Contd.)

441

08 66

442

00 07 66

447

00 10 70

448

07 39

449

15 08

455

09 89

456

00 01 38

00 30

454

00 02 46

459

457

00 00 10

458

00 06 27

602

00 61 79

00 06 35

601

00 19 71

598

594

00 02 08

599

597

00 05 95

596

00 10 36

00 17

595 ( P)

583

00 07

555

00 41 02

Metalled Road in

00 02 82

GatNo 555

}

660

00 10 08

661

666

00 26 25

665

00 04 81

672

00 48 34

714

00 47 46

733

00 36 34

00 14 89

735

809

01 15 99

SH - 71 in between

00 02 40

GatNo 809

& 860

860

00 19 50

Metalled Road in

00 02 01

between Gat No

860& 867

8859

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005 / श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Area

Gat No.

Survey No.

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

7 8

867

12 KADLAS ( Contd. )

30 24

861

00 16 86

862

00 18 99

866

17 37

865

Metalled Road in

00 02 66

between Gat No

865 & 884

21 09

884

17 11

885

00 15 92

890

00 19 26

889

00 21 22

888

00 06 93

927

04 82

900

00 05 63

925

00 06 92

924

00 01 96

923

04 68

922

00 06 28

921

07 22

920

00 12 47

919

00 02 19

914

Nala in between

00 06

Gat No 915 & 1183

835

00 16 91

1182

00 05 22

1181

05 64

1180

Metalied Road in

00 03 17

Gat No 1208

22 29

1208

00 16 58

1209

00 10 89

1210

00 19 79

1212

00 24 25

1213

12 85

1219

00 11 78

1221

00 13 98

1230

00 11 36

1231

00 13 02

1234 8860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927 [PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Gat No.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Nameof the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mt 2

1235

00 07 06 12 KADLAS ( Contd.)

1236

03 73

1240

00 06 07

1241

00 21 31

1242

1243

17 14

1257

00 24 12

1256

00 47 67

1255

00 07 06

1254

00 07 73

1253

00 06 81

1250

00 09 17

1251

00 26 51

1252

00 00 48

00 09 78

Korda River in between Gat No 1251 & V.B. of Medsingi

Total

12 59 75 13 MEDSINGI

00 09 84

KordaRiver in

between V.B. of

Kadlas& Gat No

291

Metalled Road in

00 04 57

Gat No 291

306

84 25

306

00 42 53

309

00 11 19

310

00 12 21

311

00 24 44

313

00 19 30

317

00 24 09

318

00 38 54

328

00 15 04

Aprupa Nadi in

between Gat No

00 08 36

}

328& 375

375

00 34 65

374

00 11 54

373

00 19 65

372

00 07 74 8861 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

Survey No.

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

7 8

00 03

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

13 MEDSINGI ( Contd.)

372& 411

00 09 63

411

00 06 90

412

00 15 00

413

00 17 97

414

10 86

416

417

00 08

00 44 24

420

00 27 32

423

26 37

424

00 11 17

425

00 12 98

427

00 07 53

428

05 69 70

Total

21 19

614

14 WADEGAON

00 40 51

613/1, 613/2

00 14 43

608

00 15 19

607

00 14

602

18 50

599

16 83

582

00 50 11

578

00 06 :32

568

07 06

567

00 09 81

566

13 91

556

07 56

555

00 18 41

506

SH - 3 in between

00 05 87

GatNo.

506& 490

00 07 50

490

00 04 82

491

00 04 35

492

00 06 32

493

02 68 83

Total

00 36 61

15 RAJAPUR

49 99

00 43

2211GI /2005-20 [PART II-SC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

8862

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Area

Gat No.

SurveyNo.

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

15 RAJAPUR ( Contd .)

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

90 & 84

00 48 94

00 25 28

18 13

17 56

57 25

00 59 26

03 59 38

Total

[No. R-31015/10/2004- O.R - II] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 28 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2753.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी ( पुणे) से पकनी ( सोलापुर) तक हजारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए । और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताब है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ।

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का ડર્ઝન) ડિધિનિયમ, 1962 (1962 41 50) છી ધારે 3 4) ઉપઘાયા (1 ) દ્વારા પ્રતત્ત શક્તિયળે જ પ્રયોગ રુરલે દુપ, હરસ ભૂમિ મેં પર્યાગ છે ડિઝિર ક્ષેત્ર બ્રન રુશ્વને છે છાપને બ્રાશય છી घोषणा करती है ,

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए लसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस एन कुन्वेतकर, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड, 411 028 ( पुणे जिला ) महाराष्ट्र राज्य को परियोजना (लोनी से पकनी तक हजारवाड़ी के रास्ते) मेगा सेंटर, मागरपटटा एम व एन विंग , हादापसर लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 8863

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग ।।-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

508 पाचेगाँव बुद्रुक

2403 2कोले

2404

2405

2406

2407

2408

2409

2388

2386

2383

2382

2381

2379

2378

2375

2374

2373

2372

2371

2370

2367

2163

2162

2161

2160

2159

1958

1960

1961

1752

1748

1678

35 3 जुनोनी

135

142

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयरवर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 5

05 48

कुल

14 46

00 04

00 11 28

00 19

00 24

00 26

00 20

00 07

00 19

05 07

00 10

00 17

00 12

00 07

OC 07

05 43

00 01

00 21

00 06

00 04

00 06

00 07

00 81

11 50.

00 11 11

00 07

00 06

00 08 10

04 53

कुल

00 3

0001

0008- 00

00 03

कुल 8864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

तालूका: सांगोला

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 हातीद

673

670

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप -खण्ड सं.

8 2

00 07 14

00 61 05

00 58 00

ईएन 113

503

ई एन 107

ईएन 106

454

212

107 5 मिसालवाडी

313

314

197

316

317

319

321

324

195

194

193

192

137

145

143 6 उधनवाही

618

619

620

621

622

625

629

628

627

630

626

595

594

593

592

591

00 50

00 30 50

00 09

00 27 39

39 कुल

02 50

00 27 43

00 27 53

00 03

00 06 63

00 07 28

00 02 96

00 02 72

00 06 51

00 03 49

00 01 79

00 05 05

00 05 12

01 01 10 कुल

00 24 52

00 26 38

00 04

00 07 19

00 08

00 21

00 08 58

00 11 22

00 10 19

00 21 74

00 14 44

00 08 88

00 06 69

00 07

00 09

52 00 06 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8865

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

590 उधनवाडी (निरंतर)

597

806 7 राजुरी

738

733

756

734

737

732

331

332

335

337

338

248

246

488 8 निजामपुर

467 9 अकोला

459

456

448 10 कडलास

459

597

582

583

584

585

581

569

567

568

557

588

589

577

556

661

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

00 02 67

00 55 20

02 55 07 कुल

06 24

00 23 20

00 16 05

00 12 14

00 01 93

00 05

00 15

00 01

00 06

00 01 09

00 01

00 03 44

00 05

01 00 20 कुल

00 14

कुल

00 08

00 10 55

00 04

00 23 39 कुल

03 31

00 03 81

00 02 08

00 06 80

00 01 88

00 05 78

00 09

00 00 25

00 02 81

00 23 39 2

00 02

00 05

00 34

00 01 30

32 8866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 1927

तालूका सांगोला

PART 11 - S

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

662 10 कडलास (निरतर)

664

913

1181

1179

1186

1187 उप-खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

00 10 08

00 08

00 15 89

00 02

00 05 71

00 05

00 08 27

घट नं 1187 और 1208

00 70 00

के वीच में ई एन

1237 11 मेडशिंगी

305 12 वाडेगाँव

602

601

603

600

591

583

587

586

579

577

565

561

559

558

557

578

568

567

555

554

494

195

497

498

499 }

00 15 89 कुल 02 47 43

00 08 61

00 08 61 कुल

00 15 48

00 07 10

00 25

00 03 00

00 18 00

00 07 02

00 20 14

00 15 29

00 08

03 00

00-

00 06 50

00 04 00

00 05

00 05 15

00 03 17

00 01 26 00 06 20

00 06 75 00 08 00 00 07 75 00 01 50 00 03 50 00 02 75 8867 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6. 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

| भाग ।। - खण्ड ( ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

उप -खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल कभ

गट नंबर

सर्वे मंबर

गाव का माम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

सं.

6 7 8 1

00 06

500

वाडेगाव (निरंतर)

16 75

489

कुल

[फा. मं. आर-31015/ 19/2004- ओ. आर ।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सঙ্গिল

New Delhi , the 28th July, 2005

S. O. 2753. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni ( Pune ) to Pakni ( Solapur ) via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra, an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleuin and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein,

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule, may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.N.Kundetkar , Competent Authority, Mumbai -Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mega Center , Magarpatia - M& N Wing , Hadapsar - 411028 , Pune District , Maharashtra .

8868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6, 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Taluka : SANGOLA

District : SOLAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mt 1

7 8

508

1 PACHEGAON BUDRUK

05 48

Total

05 48

2403

2 KOLE

00 14 46

2404

00 48 43

2405

00 04 64

2406

00 11 28

2407

00 19 62

2409

00 24 24

2409

00 26 79

2388

00 20 32

2386

07 42

2383

00 19 55

2382

00 03 45

2381

00 05 07

2379

00 10 50

2378

00 17 21

2375

14 27

2374

00 12 34

2373

00 07 29

2372

00 07 25

2371

00 05 43

2370

00 01 92

2367

00 21 10

2163

00 06 31

2162

00 04 91

2161

00 06 13

2160

00 07 07

2159

00 81 62

1958

00 00 60

1960

00 11 50

1961

1752

00 07 20

1748

00 06 54

1678

00 08 10

Total

53 67 3 JUNONI

00 00 30

01 00

135

08 00

142

03 10

00 12 40

Total 8869

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

673 4 HATID

670

EN 113

503

EN 107

EN 106

454

212

107

313 5 MISALWADI

314

197

316

317

319

321

324

195

194

193

192

137

145

143

618 6 UDHANWADI

619

620

621

622

625

629

628

627

630

626

595

594

593

592

591 2211G1 /2005-21

Sub-Division

No.

Area Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

00 61 05

00 58 00

00 50 25

00 30 50

00 09 74

00 27 39

00 05 72

02 50 39 Total

27 43

00 27 53

00 03 26

00 06 63

00 07 28

02 96

00 02 72

00 00 43

00 06 51

00 03 49

00 01 79

05 05

00 05 12

00 60

00 30

01 01 10 Total

00 26 38

00 04 70

07 19

08 13

00.

00 21 90

00 08 58

00 11

10 19

21 74

00 14

00 08 88

00 06 69

00 07 12

09 00

06 52

00 8870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

590 6 UDHANWADI ( Contd . )

597 7 RAJURI

806

738

733

756

734

737

732

331

332

335

337

338

248

246 8 NIJAMPUR

488 9 AKOLA

467

459

456 10 KADLAS

448

459

597

582

583

584

585

581

569

567

568

557

588

589

577

556

661 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

00 02 67

00 55 20

Total

55 07

06 24

00 23 20

00 16 05

00 01 93

00 05 48

15 03

00 01 13

00 44

00 06 69

00 01 09

00 01 97

00 03 44

00 05 37

Total

00 20

00 14 09

Total

14 09

00 08 71

00 10 55

00 04 13

00 23 39 Total

00 03 31

00 03 81

00 02 08

00 06 80

00 01 88

00 00 80

00 05 78

00 09 98

00 00 25

00 02 81

00 60

23 39

00 02 16

00 05 88

34 07

00 01 30

00 00 32 8871 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

Survey No.

No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

00 10 08

662

10 KADLAS ( Contd.)

664

08 91

913

00 15 89

00 02 24

1181

1179

00 05 71

00 05 22

1186

1187

00 08 27

70 00

{

EN in between Gat

No. 1187 & 1208

15 89

1237

02 47 43

Total

305

08 61 11 MEDSINGI

Total

00 08 61

602

00 15 48 12 WADEGAON

07 10

601

603

00 00 60

600

00 00 60

00 25 82

591

03 00

583

587

00 18 00

07 02

586

579

15 29

577

565

08 00

00 03 00

561

559

06 50

558

05 00

557

00 05 15

578

03 17

568

01 26

567

00 06 20

555

06 75

554

494

08 00

07 75

495

01 50

497

03 50

498

00 02 75

499 8872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] Taluka SANGOLA

District : SOLAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Sürvey No.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Nameof the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mt 2

7 8

500

00 06 50 12 WADEGAON ( Contd. )

489

00 16 75

Total

02 08 83

[No. R- 31015/19/2004-O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2754. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मे वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की धोषणा करतीहै.

कोई व्यकित, जो उक्त अनुसूची मे वर्णित. भूमि मे हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता के उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में पी. आर. भट्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी इंडीयन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं 3/122 रिफाइनरी टाउनशीप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर, वडोदरा-391320 ( गुजरात) को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6 , 2005/श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8873

अनुसूची

राज्य: गुजरात

जिला : वडोदरा

तालुका: वडोदरा

उप-खण्डसं.

गाँव का नाम

सर्वेक्षण सं -खण्डसं.

213

आसोज

206

207

202

201

198

199

197

183

182

181

177

137

138

139

115

116

117

क्षेत्रफल

वर्गमिटर हेक्टर

एयर

6 4

37 0

84 0

89 0

50 0

0.5 0

83 0

59 0

03 0

32 0

20 0

60 0

98 0

[फा. सं. आर-25011/5/2005 - ओ.आर -1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2005

S. O. 2754. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil . Corporation Limited.

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in theSchedule annexed to this notification ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) 8874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquirethe right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette ofIndia are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of pipeline under the land to Mr. P.R. Bhatt,Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office Qtrs. No.3/ 122, Refinery Township, P.O. Jawaharnagar, Vadodara-391320(Gujarat).

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : - Vadodara

District:- Vadodara

State:- Gujarat

Sub-Division

Name of Village

Survey/Block No

No. 1

213

Asoj

206

207

202

201

198

199

197

183

182

181

177

137

138

139

115

116

117

P--P

Area

Hectare

Are Sq.mtr. 4

6 0

41 0

37 0

84 0

48 0

89 0

50 0

0.5 0

19 0

83 0

59 0

63 0

03 0

02 0

32 0

36 0

20 0

60 0

18 0

78 0

98 [ F. No. R -25011/5/ 2005- O.R - 1 ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

8875

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2755.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केंन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मे वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की धोषणा करती है.

कोई व्यकित, जो उक्त अनुसूची मे वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता के उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में पी. आर . भट्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी इंडीयन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं 3/122 रिफाइनरी टाउनशीप, पो. ओ . जवाहरनगर, वडोदरा-391320 ( गुजरात ) कोलिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 8876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूची

जीला: - वडोदरा तालुका: - सावली

गाँवकानाम

उप-खण्डसं.

सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्डसं.

3 पीलोल

115

114

120

118

119

132

130

142

139

P4A

140

141

149

183

158

162

163

228

236

242

259

243

252

253

257

255

1141

1140

812

राय:- गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर

वर्ग मिटर

एयर

6 0

80 0

52 0

56 0

67 0

43 0

26 0

3 0

15 0

89 0

56 0

24 0

94 0

82 0

12 0

53 0

4 0

30 0

48 0

95 0

12 0

38 0

83 0

84 0

79 0

90 0

72 0

55 0

69 0

48 0

17 0

12 0

28 0

08 8877

भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

811 पीलील(नारी)

813

818

822

838

837

836

835

840

839

842

844

845

857

856

711

712

709

706

708

695

696

701

698

699

594

689

647

1146

685

648

856

656

659

662

658

634

633

632

631

619 2211GI /2005-22

5 0

9 0

89 0

15 0

7 0

72 0

2/P1

39 0

10 0

54 0

94 0

-412

56 0

P2 8878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

3 पीलील (जारी)

629

628

402

इन्द्राल

403

226

225

172

173

170

179

182

165

163

159

160

153

161

152

151

150

120

121

2/B

482

491

493

492

490

524

P/ 1

523

535

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( i) ] 4

6 0

50 0

22 0

26 0

61 0

68 0

10 0

37 0

36 0

86 0

59 0

44 0

14 0

48 0

71 0

22 0

99 0

41 0

90 0

87 0

54 0

70 0

8 0

99 0

52 0

97 0

70 0

14 0

38 0

99 0

71 0

3 8879

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त6 , 2005 / श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

535

इन्दाल (नारी)

538

537

552

557

556

551

669

563

668

666

667

664

663

653

654

650

651

711

744

743

754

753

757

1257

756

758

755

2/P/1

1276

3/1

1276

3/2

1276

210

भीमर

1234-

612

613

60 0

82 0

9 0

34 0

99 0

8 0

75 0

36 0

70 0

54 0

48 0

73 0

41 0

51 0

0 0835

89 0

0 8880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

611

भीमर (जारी..)

1/A+C

582

580

581

590

583

588

589

561

122 1

562

563

565

559

536

1/P2

536

2/P2

549

539

546

545

488/387

गराधीया

493/391

494/390

496/398

495/400

482/401

479/399

480402

478/408

477/407

474/409

510/432

511/433

513/445

517/448

518/449

519/449

516/447

543/465

[PART II- SEC . 3(ii ) ] 4

6 0

53 0

12 0

15 0

11 0

98 0

81 0

25 0

22 0

37 0

75 0

26 0

80 0

76 0

77 0

44 0

18 0

70 0

79 0

96 0

92 0

93 0

97 0

41 0

3 0

39 0

94 0

16 0

47 0

49 0

61 0

12 0

87 0

62 0

66 0

35 0

42 0

53 0

20 0

1 0

9 0

20 0

13 8881

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

552/472 गराधीया (जारी...)

551/471

549/471

548/471

547/470

560/369

561/383

562/383

563/382

20 वडादला

218

114

207

206

181

188

187

129

147

146

150

144

143

114

190 हरीपुरा

160

159

11 0

3 0

44 0

...

74 0

00923

19 0

49 0

2 0

60 0

64 0

10 0

8 0

15 10

3 0

69 1

008110016090 0

2/B

94 0

1A/P1

87 0

94 0

59 0

14 0

72352800

04 0

3/P2

3/P1

0 8882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15, 1927

158

हरीपुरा (जारी...)

157

156

165

166

167

168

169

170

1/P1

172

173

2P1

181

3/3P गंगाडीया अदलावाडा

181

4/A

181

4/B

181

23/2

23/3

181

182

11/P3

182

11/P2

202

182

2/C

182

2/B

182

2/A/P2

182

2/A/P1

182

5/A

182

5/B

182

3/2

115

1 लोटना

115

116

124

125

127

126

128

138

137

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

22 0

65 0

52 0

40 0

78 0

81 0

89 0

78 0

57 0

9 0

99 0

33 0

40 1

02 0

9 0

32 0

15 0

90 0

41 0

20 0

38 0

78 0

69 0

31 0

40 0

37 0

73 0

43 0

9 0

49 0

10 0

37 0

67 0

51 0

37 0

33 0

41 0

58 0

12 0

13 0

05 0

21 0

16 0

67 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005 /श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

लोटना (जारी)

456871

2P1

2P2

1つ

149

सादर

150

151

153

155

154

12-

154

183

182

181

179

5P2

2/P2

180

264

मुढेला

266

265

267

271

365

8883

14 0

10 0

0 8884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

364

मुदेला (जारी)

348

349

350

345

344

335

336

330

332

326

327

सींगानीया

114

10/P2 खाखरीचा

10/P6

114

10/P5

114

5/P1

114

3/P1

114

3/P2

114

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

96 0

83 0

75 0

96 0

34 0

2 0

30 0

63 0

1 0

12 0

98 0

77 0

85 0

27 0

16 0

44 0

13 0

86 0

45 0

[फा. सं . आर-25011/5/2005- ओ. आर -1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 2nd August, 2005

S. O. 2755 Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the petroleum and Minerals pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in land) 8885

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette ofIndia are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying ofpipeline under the land to Mr. P.R. Bhatt, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office Qtrs. No.3/ 122, Refinery Township, Jawaharnagar , Vadodara-391320 (Gujarat). P.O.

SCHEDULE

State:- Gujarat

Dist:- Vadodara

Tehsil:- Savli

Survey/Block NO. Sub-Division No.

Name of Village

115

Pilol

114

120

118

119

132

130

142

--2121

142

139

P4A

139

140

141

149

183

158

162

163

228

236

242

259

243

252

253

2211G1 /2005-23

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

89 0

24 0

0 8886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

257

1 Lilol (contd.)

257

255

1141

1140

1139

1134

812

811

813

818

822

838

837

836

835

840

839

842

844

2/P1

856

711

712

709

706

708

695

696

701

698

699

594

689

647

1146

685

648

656

659

662

658

634

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( i) ) 4

69 0

48 0

17 0

12 0

28 0

17 0

23 0

46 0

08 03 88

9 0

89 0

59 0

15 0

7 0

76 0

73 0

72 0

74 0

39 0

10 0

86 0

13 0

46 0

18 0

65 0

47 0

44 0

24 0

45 0

74 0

15 0

87 0

7 0

62 0

56 8887

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ⅱ ) ]

633

Pilol(contd.)

633

632

631

619

629

628

402

Indral

403

226

225

172

173

170

179

182

165

163

159

160

153

161

152

151

150

120

121

2/B

482

481

493

492

490

524

P/1

524

523

535

22 0

99 0

1411267 13

317

26 0

0 8888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

535

2 Indhal

538

537

552

557

556

551

669

563

668

666

667

664

663

653

654

650

651

711

744

743

754

753

757

1257

756

758

755

1276

2/P/1

1276

3/1

1276

3/2

1276

4 VEMAR

210

234 4

612

613

[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii )] 4

6 0

87 0

60 0

82 0

9 0

34 0

99 0

8 0

26 0

75 0

78 0

36 0

26 0

83 0

70 0

54 0

43 0

48 0

42 0

73 0

41 0

28 0

16 0

40 0

69 0

42 0

51 0

60 0

73 0

51 0

57 0

84 0

38 0

88 0

28 0

31 0

77 0

5 0

80 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005 / श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1/A+C

611

582

580

581

590

583

588

589

561

562

563

565

559

1/P2

536

2/P2

536

549

539

546

545

488/387

Garadhiya

493/391

494/390

496/398

495/400

482/401

479/399

480402

478/408

477/407

474/409

510/432

511/433

513/445

517/448

518/449

519/449

516/447

543/465

8889

53 0

11 0

82 0

26 0

80 0

60 0

18 0

70 0

93 0

97 0

3 0

94 0

61 0

87 0

62 0

53 0

1 0

9 0

94 0

13 0

16 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

8890

552/472

Gavadhiye

551/471

549/471

548/471

547/470

560/369

561/383

562/383

563/382

Vadadala

221

-21

2/B

218

114

21-21-

207

206

181

188

187

1A/P1

129

147

146

150

144

143

3/P2

114

3/P1

114

190

Haripura

160

159

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) |

6 4

7 113473 0

74 0

65 0

19 0

18 0

49 0

2 0

60 0

64 0

10 0

8 0

58 0

88 0

71 0

84 0

75 0

46 0

37 0

94 0

87 -0

94 0

14 0

04 0

56 0

79 0

12 0

0 8891

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

158

Mari Pusa

157

156

165

166

167

168

169

1/P1

170

172

173

2P1

173

3/3P

181

Gangadiya Adalwada

4/A

181

4/B

181

23/2

181

23/3

181

11/P3

182

11/P2

182

202

2/C

182

2/B

182

2/A/P2

182

2/A/P1

182

5/A

182

5/B

182

3/2

182

115

Lotana

115

116

124

125

127

126

128

138

137

52 0

33 0

81 0

41 0

0 8892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

Lotana

4 45687

2P1

2P2

149

Sadar

150

151

153

155

154

122 1 3

154

183

182

181

179

5P2

2/P2

180

264

Mudhela

266

265

267

271

365

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

14 0

56 0

930

75 0

1430 14

68 0

64 0

63048167160

4 0

83 0

56 0

64 0

50 0

20613880 9

1 0

28 0

42 0

27 0

37 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

8893

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

364

Mudhela

348

349

350

345

344

335

336

330

332

326

327

7 Singaniya

1 1

114

10/P2 Khakhariya

114

10/P6

10/P5

114

5/P1

114

3/P1

3/P2

114

6 4

96 0

83 0

75 0

96 0

34 0

2 0

30 0

63.

1 0

12 0

98 0

77 0

27 0

82 0

62 0

44 0

97 0

60 0

84 0

86 0

45 0

99 0

98 0

55 [F. No. R-25011/5/2005 -O.R- 1 ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2756.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः अब, केद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की धोषणा करती है.

2211GI/2005-24 8894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

[PART II-St . 3 ( i) ] कोई व्यकित, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता के उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में पी. आर . भट्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी इंडीयन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं 3/122 रिफाइनरी टाउनशीप, पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर, वडोदरा-391320 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: दाहोद

तालुका:दाहोद

उप-खण्ड सं.

गाँव कानाम सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्ड सं.

रोझाभ

126

जेकोत

109

रामपुरा

5/P1

5/P2 राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

वर्गमिटर हेक्टर

एयर

000

73 8895

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

कारणी तरलाइ

चापरी

--BA-

180

175

ABC--

174

172

139

बारवानी

141

143

140

142

खरोदा

403

402

102

301

103

301

104

301

101

301

00 8

59 1

20 0

6 0

82 0

0 8896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

135

उसरवाण

140

143

144

145

166

168

167

165

163

162

158

157

285

उकारडी

283

284

282

281

280

293

294

295

344

345

356

360

4 !

359

112

राजपुर

112

111

117

108

107

116

105

106

1 खारेडी

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

87 0

79 0

23 0

63 0

15 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

खारेडी (जारी...)

119

118

116

115

125

214

217

नानी रणापुर

131

122

123

111

109

108

441

नवागाँव

425

440

439

438

437

436

435

434

8897 4

72 0

13 8898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

433

नवागाँव (जोरी...)

431

432

480

399

397

395

394

391

392

384

386

378

375

376

348

2-A

335

336

348

347

345

346

321

322

284

265

264

265

269

270

267

268

247

249

246

237

238

तानाचीया

267

268

270

269

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

49 0

70 0

19 8899

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

तालाचीया (जारी...)

102

100

101

127

134

135

136

125

हीमाला

123

124

123

112

110

108

109

106

104

105

218

219

220

21 8900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

हीमाला (नारी )

5 कोटडाखुर्द

राचार्दा

258

244

243

242

246

242

237

233+248

235

234

233

228

232

231

229

202

2/2

202

3/2+3/1

203

176

169

168

166

164

163

उदार

2/14

2/13

2/4

खेंग

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4

6 0

65. 0

32 0

93 0

38 0

19 0

35 0

53 0

59 0

2 0

64 0

69 0

37 0

85 0

27 0

15 8901

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

खेंग (जारी...)

[फा. सं. आर-25011/6/2005- ओ.आर -1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2005

S. O. 2756. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section ( 1) of section 3 of the petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying ofpipeline under the land to Mr. P.R. Bhatt, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office Qtrs . No.3/ 122, Refinery Township , Jawaharnagar, Vadodara -391320 (Gujarat) . P.O. 2211GI /2005-25 8902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Dahod

Dist:- Dahod

Sub - Div. No.

Name of Village Survey/Block NO.

3 Rozam

126

--5

...

-AB Jekat

109

94 Rampura

5/P1

5/P2

Kali Talai

State:- Gujarat

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4

6 0

53 0

57 0

46 0

3 0

61 0

36 0

63 0

78 0

64 0

20 0

37 0

72 0

32 0

41 0

46 0

75 0

54 0

25 0

23 0

87 0

57 8903

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

-11

Chapari

---

BA-

180

ABC

175

174

172

139

Borvani

12--

141

143

140

142

Kharoda

403

402

102

301

103

301

104

301

101

301

-5

27 0

24 0

31 0

20 0

94 0

0 8904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

3 Usarvan

135

140

143

144

145

166

168

167

165

163

162

158

157

285

Ukardi

283

284

282

281

280

293

294

295

344

345

356

360

359

112

1 Rajpur

112

111

117

108

107

116

105

106

1 Kharedi

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

87 0

23 0

87 0

67 0

87 0

15 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005 / श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

119

118

116

115

125

214

---P

217

Nani Ranapur

131

122

123

111

109

108

441

Navagam

425

440

439

438

437

436

435

434

8905

75 0

80 0

53 0

28 0

0 8906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

433

431

432

480

399

397

395

394

391

392

384

386

378

375

376

348

335

336

348

347

345

346

321

322

284

265

264

265

269

270

267

268

247

249

246

237

238

267 Tanachiya

268

270

269

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

23 8907

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

102

100

101

127

134

135

136

125

Himala

123

124

123

112

110

108

109

106

104

105

218

219

220

87 0

30 0

21 8908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

Kotada Khurd

Racharda

258

244

243

242

246

242

237

233+248

235

234

233

228

232

231

229

2/2

202

3/2+3/1

203

176

169

168

166

164

163

Udar

2/14

2/13

2/4

Kheng

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

93 0

66 0

24 0.

20 0

15 8909 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[F. No. R-25011/6/2005 -O.R- I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secу.

नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2757.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः अब , केद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की धोषणा करती है.

कोई व्यकित, जो उक्त अनुसूची मे वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में पी . आर . भट्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी इंडीयन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं 3/122 रिफाइनरी टाउनशीप, पो. ओ . जवाहरनगर, वडोदरा -391320 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

2211GI/2005-26 8910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST6 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

अनुसूची

[PART II- SE . 3 (ii) ]

जिला: दाहोद

तालुका: बारीया

गाँव का नाम

उप-खण्ड सं.

सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्ड सं.

नाथुडी

124

रामा

126

128

129

144

147

173

174

176

175

कालीयामोन्य

303

330

229

1P2

1P4

229

231

311

232

234

218

215

214

170

175

174

173

179

180

215

रेबारी

215

214

213

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर

वर्गमिटर

एयर

73 0

17 0

75 0

62 0

65 0

98 0

21 0

91 0

11 0

51 0

24 0

30 0

71 U

68 0

55 0

64 0

50 0

53 0

13 ن

30 0

29 0

91 0

5 0

0 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

137

135

132

131

130

129

128

102

101

106

107

105

109

110

माती-झारी

208

209

207

206

198

197

196

195

194

192

8911

38 0

6 0

72 0

78 0

47 0

1 0

25 0

13 0

62 0

77 0

28 0

68 0

59 0

89 0

97 0

62 0

45 0

28 0

53 8912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

193

473

पीपलोद

474

582

580

579

539

285

594

609

567.

593

639

598

241

483

239

240

237

236

235

297

पंचेला

100

130

127

128

3P2

3P1

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

19 0

94 0

40 0

48 0

01 0

42 0

20 0

80 0

[फा. सं. आर-25011/6/2005 - ओ. आर-1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव 8913

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 2nd August, 2005

S. O. 2757. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessaryin the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas it appears to the Central Govemment that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying ofpipeline under the land to Mr. P.R. Bhatt, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office Qtrs . No.3/ 122, Refinery Township, P.O. Jawahamagar, Vadodara -391320 (Gujarat) .

SCHEDULE

Dist:- Dahod Tehsil : - Bariya

Name of Village Survey/ Block NO . Sub-Div . NO.

Nathudi

124

Rama

126

128

129

144

147

173

174

176

175

303

KaliyaGota

320

State: - Gujarat

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 4

0 89.14

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

229

1P2 Kaliya Gota ( contal..)

229

1P4

231

311

232

234

218

215

214

170

175

174

173

179

180

215

1 Rebari

215

214

213

137

135

132

131

130

129

128

102

101

106

107

105

109

110

[PART II-SE 3 (i ) ) 4

24 0

30 0

71 0

74 0

68 0

5 0

45 0

55 0

64 0

39 0

50 0

17 0

53 0

13 0

30 0

29 0

97 0

95 0

38 0

6 0

72 47

78 0

70 0

88 0

50 0

46 0

41 8915

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 1

Moti Zari

208

209

207

206

198

197

196

195

194

192 192.

473

Piplod

474

582

580

579

539

285

594

609

567

593

639

598

241

483

239

240

237

236

235

297

Panchela

95 0

77 0

16 0

68 0

71 0

89 0

28 0

17 17

0 8916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii )] J

Panchela (Contd.. )

65 100

83 130

31 127

19 128

44 86

3P2

28 86

3P1

[F. No. R- 25011/6/2005-0.R- I ]

S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2005

का.आ. 2758.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः अब, केद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की धोषणा करती है.

कोई व्यकित, जो उक्त अनुसूची मे वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता के उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में पी. आर . भट्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी इंडीयन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं 3/122 रिफाइनरी टाउनशीप, पो.ओ . जवाहरनगर, वडोदरा -391320 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 8917

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

जिला: दाहोद तालुका: लीमखेडा

गाँवकानाम सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्डसं. उप-खण्डसं.

प्रतापपुरा

137

पानाया

137

2-12632

137

1+2

136

131

130

125

119

पलाली

119

2211G1/2005-27

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मिटर हेक्टर एयर

17 8918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

3 1

अंधारी

199

खुंधा

207

180

....-

179

1657.

-AB21

2+3

1+3

172

1+3

-4

[PART II--SEC. 3 (ii )] 4

82.

2 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8919

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6. 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

7+3

5+8+9

खीरखेरी

237

3+4

1+2P/1+4+ 5

1P2

174

12P

172

171

6+8+10

171

173

2+3+4

173

169

168

166

167

1/P2

165

1/P1+3

165

164

163

162

161

159

218

174

156

174

धाधरा

वालुंन्दी

पोलीसीमळ

0 8920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) | 1

10 12

टांटाधादी

66 13

[फा. सं. आर-25011/6/2005- ओ.आर- [ ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2005

S. O. 2758-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in thepublic interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in theSchedule annexed to this notification ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act1962(50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intentionto acquirethe right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette ofIndia are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying ofpipeline under the land to Mr. P.R. Bhatt, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs . No.3/ 122 , Refinery Township, Jawaharnagar, Vadodara-391320 (Gujarat). P.O.

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

8921

SCHEDULE

Dist:- Dahod Tehsil: kimkheda

Survey/Block NO. Sub-Division NO.

Name of Village

Pratap Pura

-1231

137

Pania

137

136

131

130

125

112-126321221-981671 P7 1

119

Palali

119

State:-Gujarat

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

6 4

98 0

38 0

91 0

12 0

13 0

24 0

47 0

42 0

0 8922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

P2 2 Andhari

-----2

머

21112

Kundha

199

207

180

------

179

1657

AB21-214323

2+3

1+3

172

-42315-10

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

85 2

78 0

33 0

14 0

85 0

78 0

02 0

31 0

1220184920054508810

84 00000010000

10 0

35 0

99 0

64 0

52 000000 0

26 0

24752 12

14 0

59 0

24 0

47 0

41 0

46 0

28 0

9 972018

2 8923

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005 / श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II--खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7+3

5+8+9

Khirkheri

237

3+4

1+2P/1+4+ 5

1P2

174

12P

174

172

171

6+8+10

171

173

2+3+4

173

169

168

166

167

1/P2

165

1/P1+ 3

165

164

163

162

161

159

218

174

156

174

Dhadhara

Valundi

Policimal

0 8924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

[ PART II-SE 3 ( ii ) |

Tantaghati

[ F. No. R-25011/6/2005-0.R- I ] S. K. CHITKARA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 2 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2759.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केंन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मे वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की धोषणा करती है .

कोई व्यकित, जो उक्त अनुसूची मे वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता के उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में पी. आर . भट्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी इंडीयन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं 3/122 रिफाइनरी टाउनशीप, पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर, वडोदरा -391320 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

अनुसूची

जिला: पंचमहाल तालुका: धोधंबा

गाँव कानाम

उप-खण्ड सं.

सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्डसं.

दामावाव

115

P2+P3

117

118

1-2--23 P1 P3

शेरपुरा

191

190

189

1+2

194

193

195

196

2211GI/2005-20

8925 राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मिटर हेक्टर एयर

45 0

16 0

38 0

24 0

65 0

38 0

88 0

08 0

0 8926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

3 1

2A+2B

196

सीमलीया

197

187

188

102

179

2P1

148

176

145

144

140

141

100

108

[PART I-SEC.3 ( ) ] 4

13 0

49 0

92 0

71 0

09 0

35 0

46 0

94 0

83 0

56 0

23 0

47 0

97 0

34 0

10 0

51 0

69 0

53 0

32 0

0 अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

भारत का राजपत्र

{ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1+4

'82

'83

701

702

700

651

653

165

खीलोडी( रीचवानी )

166

167

187

190

188

205

206

239

223

224

236

8927

41 0

13 0

25 0

54 0

82 0

61 0

14 0

66 0

42 0

82 0

23 0

42 0

4 0

11 0

83 0

76 0

83 0

81 0

56 0

77 0

41 0

53 0

49 0

4 0

92 0 8928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II -SEC . 3(ii) ]

225

218

2+5

226

207

191

2+3

191

शानीयादा

1P2

[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2005- ओ.आर-1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2005

S. O. 2759. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act,1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette ofIndia are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying ofpipeline under the land to Mr. P.R. Bhatt, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs. No.3/122, Refinery Township, Jawaharnagar, Vadodara -391320 (Gujarat). P.O.

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8929

SCHEDULE

Dist:- Panch Mahal Tehsil : - Goghamba

Sub-Div. ΝΟ .

Survey/Block NO .

Name of Village

Damavav

P2+P3

115

117

118

Sherpura

191

190

189

1+2

194

193

195

196

State: - Gujarat

Area

Are Sq.mtr. Hectare

30 0

0 8930

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

2A+2B

196

Simaliya

197

187

188

182

183

181

179

2P1

148

176

145

144

140

141

100

108

[PART H- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

13 0

77 0

18 0

49 0

92 0

63 0

71 0

09 0

77 0

63 0

35 0

64 0

21 0

46 0

94 0

83 0

03 0

1 0

23 0

97 0

00 0

71 0

10 0

90 0

59 0

7 0

2 0

57 0

52 0

0 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1+4

782

783

701

702

700

651

653

165

Khilodi ( Richvani )

166

167

187

190

188

205

206

239

223

224

236

8931 4

41 0

13 0

25 0

54 0

15 0

91 0

82 0

14 0

87 0

44 0

4 0

49 0

0 8932

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

225

218

2+5

226

207

191

2+3

Shaniada

1P2

[F. No. R-25011/7/2005-0.R-1 ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2760.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

कोई व्यकित, जो उक्त अनुसूची मे वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता के उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में पी. आर. भट्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी इंडीयन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं 3/122 रिफाइनरी टाउनशीप, पो. ओ. जवाहरनगर, वडोदरा -391320 ( गुजरात) को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 8933

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

जिला: पंचमहाल

तालुका: गोधरा

उप-खण्डसं.

गाँव का नाम सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्डसं.

665

गोलाव

654

615

620

629

631

632

635

1,2,3

643

642

640

1,2,3

644

528

527

524

522

523

538

537

539

459

449

450

448

452

233

230

253

254

256

257

258

261

260

2211GI /2005-29

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

वर्गमिटर हेक्टर एयर

6 4

66 0

32 0

4.1

37 0

92 0

12 0

89 0

36.

0 8934

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

3 1

265

280

266

310

309

311

3 /P1

311

305

312

दहीकोट

P1+P2

P1 +P2

158

209

210

211

212

214

215

218

234

201

200

223

195

229

[PART II-- SEC. 3 ( ii ) [ 4

6 U

18 0

43 0

95 0

08 U

81 0

65 0

85 0

83 0

67 0

42 0

55 0

00 0

78 0

46 0

06 0

46 0

26 0

98 0

85 0

28 0

10 0

29 8935 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005 / श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

194

235

[ पन. सं. आर-25011/ 7/ 2005- ओ.आर-1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सांचव

New Delhi , the 2nd August, 2005

S. O. 2760 .--Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the iransportation of petroleum productsfrom Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Guja at a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1) of section 3 of the petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , issued under sub-section (1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette ofIndia are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying ofpipeline under the land to Mr. P.R. Bhatt, Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office Qtrs . No.3/122, Refinery Township , Jawaharnagar, Vadodara- 391320 (Gujarat). P.O.

8936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Godhra

Dist:-Panch Mahal

Sub-Div. NO.

Name of Village Survey/Block NO.

665

2 Gollav

654

615

620

629

631

632

635

643

1,2,3

642

640

644

1,2,3

528

527

524

522

523

538

537

539

459

449

450

448

452

233

230

253

254

256

257

258

261

260

State:-Gujarat

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 4

6 0

66 0

33 0

32 0

55 0

45 0

75 0

37 0

74 0

92 0

76 0

66 0

75 0

20 0

45 0

97 0

24 0

66 0

74 0

27 0

93 0

08 0

94 0

0 8937

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्डः 3( ii) ]

3 1

265

280

266

310

309

72-22 P2

311

3/P1

311

305

312

Dahikot

P1+P2

P1+ P2

160

159

158

209

210

211

212

214

215

218

234

201

200

223

195

-2-324

195

229

0 8938

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART I-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 2

194

04 235

[F. No. R-25011/7/2005-0.R-I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2005

का आ. 2761.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मे वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करतीहै.

कोई व्यकित, जो उक्त अनुसूची मे वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतिया साधारण जनता के उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचेपाईपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में पी. आर. भट्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी इंडीयन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं 3/122 रिफाइनरी टाउनशीप, पो. ओ. जवाहरनगर, वडोदरा -391320 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सकेगा 1 .

भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

8939 राज्य: गुजरात

जिला: पंचमहाल

तालुका: कालोल

उप-खण्डसं.

सर्वेक्षण सं -खण्डसं.

गाँव कानाम

269

मधवास

270

271

272

265

264

258

259

242

233

234

231

235

236

238

216

217

212

211

191

193

195

198

196

197

170

166

100

101

102

103

104

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मिटर

एयर

हेक्टर

6 4

1 0

113

76 0

100

-151876

0 8940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

111

484

अनीधरा

172

171

168

169

170

165

164

145

जेतपुर

144

153

114

115

1+2

107

295

293

307

311

124

125

119

106

108

287

313

286

285

120

116

129

121

294

308

148

147

109

146

143

310

जमनापुर

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 4

6 0

13 0

49 0

31 0

97 0

43 0

47 0

82 0

41 0

84 0

79 0

9 0

31 0

4 0

88 0

4 0

10 0

41 0

86 0

75 0

70 0

36 0

7 0

44 0

53 0

41 0

1 0

16 0

22 0

16 0

21 0

31 0

90 0

17 0

75 0

54 0

69 0

57 0

74 0

50 भारत का राजपंत्र : अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अलवा

123円-

2-1-

머 P1

309

머머 P1

307

कंडाच

295

294

296

2-3

305

304

303

306

314

323

322

321

320

319

402

410

411

2211GI /2005-30

8941

6 4

34 0

32 0

26 0

75 0

2 0

10 0

50 0

95 0

46 0

6 0

80 0

53 28

73 25

44 28

82 81

43 0

6123

19 0

47 0

1 0

87 0

195104922315

0 8942

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15. 1927

412

413

445

446

447

450

457

136

ऊतरेडीया

135

146

134

147

-112--21211A1 P2

133

149

107

---

150

104

105

103

102

12-112

102

101

159

1+8

[PART U-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

6 4

59 0

70 0

71 0

91 0

84 0

2 0

32 0

28 0

15 0

66 0

6 0

30 0

82 0

81 0

14 0

84 0

39 0

74 0

53 0

1+8P1 & 1 +4P1

A2/1

A2/2

-12-12

772125278615704

67 0

84 0

47 0

31 22

32 0

0 27

000 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

414 अलाली

415

416

417

424

425

423

427

428

429

434

78 व्यासडा

111

110

114

115

1507

1504

1503

1502

1488

1487

1486

1484

1481

1480

1456

1457

1441

1440

8943 3

6 0

1/1

22 0

19 1

27 34

95 0

11 1

19 1

62 12

2+3

1+2

43 0

97 2

69 0

91 1

80 0

27 10

96 10

49 0

15 3

71 0

66 0

70 0

27 0

53 23

11 31

19 0

58 11

91 27

80 0

60 0

80 17

07 11

22 12

58 0

43 0 8944

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

1439

1426

1427

1430

1438

1413

1412

1216

1221

1235

1236

1237

1198

1199

1197

1263

1195

1107

1516

-A

1186

1187

755

अदादरा

754

2+4

754

756

785

786

803

802

800

801

835

834

833

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

72 0

43 0

86 0

00 0

92 0

52 0

76 0

40 0

51 0

25 0

87 0

68 0

19351 7

93 0

12 0

33 0

23 0

10559

30 0

255 15

88 0

26 0

36 0

23 0

15200340

59 0

87 0

64 22

0 0

10 0

19 0

13 0

712

69 0

44 0 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

3 1

-1

112

1 भुकी

112

110

113

118

117

116

2-54273--12

12-212-12

फानसी

310

करोली

310

308

8945 4

6 0

22 0

30 0

79 0

72 0

18 0

80 0

40 0

30 0

10 0

40 0

79 0

83 0

51 0

46 0

37 0

43 0

27 0

13 46

46 35

53 13

34 13

90 18

53 0

84 0

29 0

96 25

54 0

30 0

62 0

06 0

89 8946

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) [

79 255

320

24 320

29 313

1P1

313

309

93 256

01 256

1P1

82 254

1/1

321

321-

46 255

14 255

[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2005- ओ. आर-1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2005

S. O. 2761. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in theSchedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette ofIndia are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying ofpipeline under the land to Mr. P.R. Bhatt , Coinpetent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office Qtrs . No.3/122, Refinery Township , P.O. Jawahamagar, Vadodara- 391320 (Gujarat).

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8947

SCHEDULE

Dist:- Panch Mahal

Tehsil :- Kalol

Survey/ Block NO. Sub-Division NO.

Name of Village

269

Madhvas

270

271

272

265

264

258

259

242

233

234

231

235

236

238

216

217

212

211

191

193

195

198

196

197

170

166

100

101

102

103

104

State:-Gujarat

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

12 0

67 0

88 0

98 0

44 0

17 0

42 0

46 0

1 0

76 0

83 0

71 0

36 0

3 0

37 0

9 0

2 0

05 0

3022601676

44 0

24 8948

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

111

484

172

Anidara

171

168

169

170

165

164

145

Jetpur

144

153

114

1+2

115

107

295

293

307

311

124

125

119

106

108

287

313

286

285

120

116

129

121

294

308

148

147

109

146

143

310

Jamanapur

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

6 0

13 0

49 0

31 0

97 0

43 0

82 0

84 0

79 0

9 0

31 0

4 0

86 0

75 0

70 0

7 0

44 0

53 0

1 0

16 0

22 19

21 0

31 24

0 0

75 0

54 0

71 0

69 0

74 0

3 0

69 0

11 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

3 1

123

Alwa

門 P1

----

12-1-

머 P1

309

......

307

Kandach

295

294

296

305

304

303

306

1-2-3-112

306

314

323

322

-12

322

321

320

319

-12

402

410

411

2211G1/2005-31

8949 4

6 0

36 0

48 0

25 0

75 0

2 0

53 28

41 33

73 25

44 28

27 15

82 81

29 15

48 12

68 0

162895104923559 8950

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

412

413

445

446

447

112

450

457

136

2 Utrediya

135

146

134

1/1

147

133

1/1

149

107

150

104

-12

105

103

102

101

159

1+8

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4

6 0

59 0

86 0

70 0

77 0

7 0

25 0

71 0

91 0

41 0

15 0

84 0

53 0

1 0

28 0

15 0

6 0

82 0

81 0

74 0

1+8P1 & 1 +4P1

A2/1

A2/2

1 1

47 0

84 28

31 0

0 0 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8951

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

1/1

2+3

1+2

414

Alali

415

416

417

424

425

423

427

428

429

434

Vyasda

111

110

114

115

1507

1504

1503

1502

1488

1487

1486

1484

1481

1480

1456

1457

1441

1440

22 0

69 0

28 10

49 0

71 0

70 0

27 0

11 0

19 0

58 0

91 0

60 0

80 11

22 12

4 8952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

3 1

1439

1426

1427

1430

1438

1413

1412

1216

1221

1235

1236

1237

1198

1199

1197

1263

1195

1107

1516

A-

1186

1187

755

Adadara

754

756

785

786

803

802

800

801

835

21211241-1B

835

834

833

---

12-2-2

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

6 4

06 0

25 0

57 0

92 0

25 0

1079351151055925

156

15200340124

13 0

69 0

0 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

3 1

112

Bhuki

112

110

113

5427

113

118

117

116

12-212

Fansi

12-

310

Karoli

310

308

8953

80 0

40 0

8 09711121680

66 0

06 0

27 0

13 0

98 0

46 0

238107781208271346035

0 8954

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] 1

255

79 320

06 320

24 313

29 313

1P1

46 309

6 256

93 256

1P1

01 254

82 321

1/1

93 321

19 255

46 255

[F. No. R-25011/7/2005-0.R-I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2762.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः अब, केंद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की धोषणा करती है.

कोई व्यकित, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतिया साधारण जनता के उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में पी. आर. भट्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी इंडीयन ऑयल कोपर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं 3/122 रिफाइनरी टाउनशीप, पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर, वडोदरा-391320 ( गुजरात ) कोलिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 8955

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

जिला: पंचमहाल

तालुका: हालोल

उप-खण्ड सं.

सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्डसं.

गाँव कानाम

2313

कंजरी( चंन्द्रपुरा)

2312

2315

2317

2316

2314

2335

2333

2334

2344

241

2/3

209

208

214

215

228

229

230

237

235

242

2P1

2P2

116

मुवाला

113

112

2/1

108

1/1/P

109

1/2/P

109

105

104

78.

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मिटर

एयर

हेक्टर

6 4

64 0

18 0

79 0

97 0

39 0

36 0

27.

88 0

92 0

0 8956

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005/SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] 1

6 2

111

16 मुवाला

3 106

2/1

102

[ फा. स. आर-25011/7/2005- ओ.आर -1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिद

New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2005

S. O. 2762.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed , to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of section 3 of the petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification . issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of pipeline under the land to Mr. P.R. Bhatt, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office Qtrs . No.3/122, Refinery Township, P.O. Jawaharnagar, Vadodara-391320 (Gujarat) .

8957

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Halol

Dist:- Panch Mahal Name of Village Survey/Block NO. Sub-Division NO.

2313

Kanjari

2312

(Chandrapura)

2315

2317

2316

2314

--2

2335

2333

2334

2344

241

2/3

209

208

214

215

228

229

230

237

235

242

2P1

2P2

116

Muwala

113

112

2/1

108

1/1/P

109

1/2/P

109

105

104

111

2/1

106

102

2211G1 /2005-32

State:- Gujarat

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

6 4

18 0

79 0

97 0

39 0

18 0

36 0

1 0

34 0

27 0

80 0

31 0

49 0

43 0

36 0

83 0

88 0

[F. No. R-25011 /7/2005-0.R-I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

8958

नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2763.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 631 , तारीख 21 फरवरी , 2005, में जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2- खंड 3 , उपखंड (ii ) तारीख 26 फरवरी 2005, में पृष्ठ 1778 से पृष्ठ 1781 पर प्रकाशित की गई थी, निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात:-

उक्त अधिसूचना की इस अनुसूची में :-

(क) पृष्ठ संख्या 1780 पर, स्तम्भ 2 में ग्राम " मकसूदनप " , शब्द के स्थान पर " मकसूदनपुरा " पढ़े ।

[फा. सं. आर-31015/88/2004-ओ.आर- ॥ ] हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 5th Augüst , 2005

S. O. 2763. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.631 , dated the 21st February , 2005 , published at pages 1778 to 1781 , in Part II , section 3 , sub- section (ii ) , of the Gazette of India, dated the 26th February , 2005 , namely: -

In the Schedule to the said notification : -

(a) at page 1780, against village "Maksudanpura " ; 66 Maksudanp" , read

[No. R- 31015/88/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

8959

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2764.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 631 तारीख 21 फरवरी , 2005 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 28 फरवरी , 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में म्रांगल्या (इंदौर) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई मांगल्या पाईपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाईपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 25 अप्रैल, 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाईपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में विनिर्दष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की ताख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहितं होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : सवाई माधोपुर

तहसील : मलारना डूंगर

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

सर्वे नंबर

ग्राम का नाम

क्र०

0.4536

414

पीलवा नदी

0.1087

405

0.0777

399

0.2551

397

0.0072

396

0.0072

321

0.0114

320

0.0144

319

0.1445

471

0.0265

477

0.0105

476

0.1806

475

0.0823

486

0.4597

485

0.2015

652

0.3061

647

0.0040

650

0.2232

643

0.0284

642

0.1229

641

0.0720

620

0.0754

625

0.0858

621

0.1152

623 8960

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

0.0864

614

मीलवा नदी (जारी...)

0.1968

590

0.1152

586

0.0101

585

0.1440

584

0.2232

582

0.0050

580

0.0050

581

0.1584

576

0.0020

472

0.0020

473

0.0020

570

575

0.0435

0.0586

574

0.0255

572

0.1581

571

0.1872

195

बाढ़ पीलवा नदी

0.0100

188

116

0.0020

चक बिलोली

0.0720

115

0.1440

114

0.1080

112

107

0.1080

0.0218

106

105

0.0216

0.1260

104

0.1322

103

0.0288

102

0.1872

101

0.0216

100

0.1368

0.0828

0.0360

0.1152

0.0864

0.0216

165

0.3456

कोथाली

0.6600

164

0.0288

166

109

0.1440

108

0.3816

107

0.0576

0.3240

106

0.2160

0.1872

0.0144

0.3528

0.1872

0.1512

0.0216

0.2088

0.0144

105

0.1116

एबरा

106

0.0540

107

0.2412

0.0324

109

0.1404

0.2412

110

112/1

0,1728

(फ. सं. आर-31015/88/2004-ओआर-11 )

हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव 8961

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005 / श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 5th August, 2005

S. O. 2764. Whereas by a notification of the Govemment of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 631 , dated the 21 February, 2005, issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred toas the said Act) published in the Gazette of India dated the 26th February, 2005 , the Central Govemment declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying an extension pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai -Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Manglya (Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 25th April , 2005;

Andwhereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to theCentral Govemment;

Andwhereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that the right of user in the said land, specified in the Schedule, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Ceritral Govemment directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

STATE : RAJASTHAN

DISTRICT : SAWAI MADHOPUR

TEHSIL : MALARNA DUNGAR

Area in Hectare

Survey No.

S.No.

Name of Village

0.4536

414

Pilwa Nadi

0.1087

405

0.0777

399

0.2551

397

0.0072

398

0.0072

321

0.0114

320

0.0144

319

0.1445

471

0.0285

477

0.0105

476

0.1806

475

0.0823

0.4597

485

0.2015

652

0.3081

647

0.0040

650

0.2232

643

0.0284

642

0.1229

641

0.0720

620

0.0754

625

0.0858

621

0.1152

623 8962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 2

614

Pilwa Nadi (Contd.)

0.0864

590

0.1968

586

0.1152

585

0.0101

584

0.1440

582

0.2232

580

0.0050

581

0.0050

576

0.1584

472

0.0020

473

0.0020

570

0.0020

575

0.0435

574

0.0586

572

0.0255

571

0.1581

Badh Pilwa Nadi

195

0.1872

188

0.0100

Chak Biloli

116

0.0020

115

0.0720

114

0.1440

112

0.1080

107

0.1080

106

0.0216

105

0.0216

104

0.1260

103

0.1322

102

0.0288

101

0.1872

100

0.0216

0.1368

0.0828

0.0360

0.1152

0.0864

0.0216

Kothali

165

0.3456

164

0.6600

166

0.0288

109

0.1440

108

0.3816

107

0.0576

106

0.3240

0.2160

0.1872

0.0144

0.3528

0.1872

0.1512

0.0216

0.2088

0.0144

Abra

105

0.1116

106

0.0540

107

0.2412

0.0324

109

0.1404

110

0.2412

112/1

0.1728

[ F.No. R - 31015/88/2004- OR- II ]

Harish Kumar, Under Secretary 8963

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्त, 2005

का. आ. 2765.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 769 तारीख 25 फरवरी, 2005, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 5 मार्च, 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इंदौर) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई-मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 30 अप्रैल , 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: शाजापुर

तहसील: सुसनेर

राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

सर्वे नंबर

ग्राम का नाम

क्र०

0.5240

84(शास .भूमि)

1 नाहरखेड़ा

0.0259

85(नदी)

0.1320

86(शास.भूमि)

0.1521

87(शास .भूमि)

0.0305

83(नदी)

0.2365

0.1962

0.0512

77(नदी)

0.0306

0.1458

0.0557

0.0127

0.2237

0.3160

0.1656

0.0718

125

0.1977

127(शास.भूमि)

0.0847

37(शास. भूमि)

0.8671

667(शास.भूमि)

2 उमरिया

0.0327

132(शास. नाला)

0.0327

120(शास.भूमि)

0.0028

130(शास.भूमि)

0.0274

134(शास. नाला)

8964

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

3 2 उमरिया (जारी....)

[ PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 4

139 (शास.भूमि)

0.0141

140(शास.भूमि)

0.0547

151 (शास.भूमि)

0.2003

152(शास.भूमि)

0.0005

0.0140

150(शास.भूमि)

149(शास.भूमि)

0.0084

181 (शास. नाला)

0.0403

180(शास. भूमि)

0.2865

0.0168

161 (शास.भूमि)

164(शास.भूमि)

0.3590

165(शास.भूमि)

0.0108

173(शास.भूमि)

0.0100

177(शास.भूमि)

0.5287

166(शास.भूमि)

3 पिपलिया नानकर

90(शास.भूमि) 0.0055

0.0419

179(शास.भूमि)

0.2270

180(शास.भूमि)

0.6403

155(शास . रास्ता)

159

157

156 0.1152

0.2035

0.0426

0.0757

172(शास. नाला)

139

141

140

145

152

146

148 0.0133

0.0640

0.0114

0.2429

0.0342

0.0816

0.0572

0.0878

149(शास.रास्ता)

0.1862

0.0142

346(शास .रास्ता)

345

340

339

338

337 0.0061

0.8000

0.1215

0.0768

0.0103

426(शास. रास्ता)

428

429

430

461

458

459

456

452

451 0.0387

0.0664

0.1170

0.0808

0.0085

0.0811

0.0249

00697

0.0287

0.0456 8965 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0.0410

450

3 पिपलिया नानकर (जारी....)

0.1058

447

0.0334

483(शास .नाला)

0.0881

626

0.0682

625

0.0106

624

0.0435

624/1411 (शास.भूमि)

0.0090

289

0.0010

275

4 बामनिया खेड़ी

0.1097

276

0.0358

277

0.0010

293

0.2427

292

0.0212

301

0.0295

302

0.0111

304

0.0425

305

0.1704

353

0.1039

363

0.0180

366

0.0998

365

0.0224

367

0.0816

371

0.0842

372

0.0190

379(शास.रास्ता)

0.1028

413

0.0010

412

0.0200

411

0.0079

414

0.0213

417(शास .नाला)

0.0219

415

0.0381

416

0.0493

470

0.0140

468/1255

0.0109

469

0.0158

468

0.0884

467

0.0181

471

0.0124

466

0.0823

472

0.1221

465

0.0031

473

0.1189

474

0.0203

475

0.0737

476

0.0716

477

2211G1/2005-33 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 8966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

0:2028

482

4 बामनिया खेड़ी (जारी..

0.1177

480

0.0152

481

0.0200

364

0.3000

485

483

0.0100

0.0032

393

5 मैना

0.2132

390

0.0034

392

0.0258

389

0.0313

1048 (शास .रास्ता)

404

0.0949

0.1854

412

0.1310

411

0.1122

410

0.0269

429

430

0.1483

0.0789

431

0.0010

1032

0.0398

1037(शास. रास्ता )

0.1812

1023

0.1322

1024

0.1154

1025

0.0580

1026

0.0874

1012

0.1131

980

0.0876

982

0.0292

983

0.0745

984

0.0307

993

0.0767

994

992

0.0529

0.0424

991

0.0526

1163

0.0615

1159

0.0618

1164

0.0633

1957

0.0431

1156

0.0085

1154

0.0353

1640 (शासनाला)

0.2185

1646

0.0010

1647

0.0196

1644

0.0303

1757

0.0837

1756

0.0202

1755 8967

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

0.0143

1745

5 मैना (जारी )

0.0653

1746

0.1070

1747

0.0131

1749

0.0339

1741

0.0162

1778

0.0320

1812

0.0063

1813

0.0961

1818

0.0039

1819

0.0197

1817

0.0750

1820

0.0012

1839

0.0412

1837

0.0656

1838

0.0220

1840

0.0264

1842

0.0224

1843

0.0140

1844

0.0193

1860

0.1034

1859

0.0124

1861

0.0150

1858

0.0102

1972

0.1582

1899

0.0985

2001

0.0159

2002

0.2050

2003

0.0284

2005

0.0466

2004

0.0843

2026

0.0625

2017

0.0389

2016

0.0456

2015

0.1362

2014

0.1327

2018

0.0482

2010 (शास भूमि)

0.0400

2012

0.0300

1155

0.0200

989

0.0100

1013

0.0100

432

0.0400

391

0.0200

981

0.0491

731 (शास .नाला)

6 बोरखेड़ी

0.5212

481 8968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

3 6

477 बोरखेड़ी (जारी....)

482

475

476 [PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] 4

0.0375

0.0554

0.0200

0.0541

0.0498

478 (शास.नाला)

90 0.4114

109(शास.नाला)

84 0.0147

0.3122

0.0356

0.0249

0.0407

0.0920

0.1495

0,0071

0.0292

0.0818

0.0467

0.1575

0.0538

0.0168

0.0709

0.1253

0.0302

0.0192

0.1228

0.1930

0.0070

0.0986

0.1022

0.0184

0.0100

0.0400

85(शास नाला)

877 7. गुराड़ी

878

879 0.0100

0.0002

0.2816

0.0566

401 (शास.नाला)

873

876

875

874

399

58 8 शत्रुखेड़ी

57 1

54 0.0101

0.0151

0.2031

0.0002

0.0001

0.0040

0.0165

0.1784

0.1245 8969 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0.0847

8 शत्रुखेड़ी (जारी......

0.0195

0.2173

0.3374

0.0530

48 (शास.नाला)

0.7861

0.0232

26(शास .रास्ता)

0.0641

0.1240

0.0016

0.4829

0.0315

99 (शास. सड़क)

231

0.3129

0.0016

0.0100

0.1599

737

9 मालनवासा

736

0.1657

0.0497

358 (शास. नाला)

293

0.0748

294

0.0418

0.0010

303

302

Q.0977

323

0.0808

324

0.0822

0.0113

300

0.1447

336

0.0805

337

0.0786

339

0.0271

251

0.1035

250

0.0026

344

243

0.1235

345

0.0219

0.1168

242

347

0.0412

0.0865

233

0.0233

232

0.0212

234

227

0.1603

0.0823

222

0.0777

221

0.0147

220

0.1538

217

0.0897

214

0.0917

213

0.0300

212 8970

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 / SRAVANA 15. 1927

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) | 1

10 ननोरा

829

0.1041

830

0.0602

831

0.0586

833

0.0641

834

0.0032

818

0.1593

817

0.0792

842

0.0494

843

0.0524

166 (शास . नाला)

0.0557

169

0.0160

170

0.1697

144

0.1057

145

0.1269

147

0.1328

148

0.0849

149

0.1743

150

0.0537

152

0.0397

153

0.1010

154( शास.नाला)

0.0262

749

0.0010

745

0.0600

748

0.0100

837

0.0100

841

0.0100

11 कादमी

274 (शास . रास्ता)

0.0362

278

0.0946

279

0.0032

277

0.1021

268

0.1318

267

0.0474

266

0.0361

261

0.0185

262

0.0620

248

0.2183

242

0.1511

235

0.1092

241

0.0118

236

0.1530

237

0.1826

104(शास.रास्ता)

0.0475

112

0.0794

114

0.1115

116

0.0315

119

0.0621 8971 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) 」

0.0830

120

11 कादमी (जारी.........

0.0238

117(शास . रास्ता)

0.0119

0.0120

0.0193

1 (शास.नाला)

0.0677

0.1507

0.0058

0.0394

0.0106

0.0107

0.0599

0.0444

0.0516

0.0217

0.0565

602(शास. रास्ता)

0.2318

538

0.0924

546

0.1370

547

0.0672

571

0.1201

570

0.0739

577

0.1374

568

0.1662

567

0.2380

566

0.0873

589

0.1439

591

0.1868

593

0.0023

608

0.0477

609 (शास. रास्ता)

0.0520

617/827

0.1572

610

0.0400

274

0.0200

263

0.0100

238

0.0400

113

0.0100

115

0.0300

0.0100

122

0.0100

0.1566

897

12 मेहतपुर

0.0734

893

0.0841

894

0.1417

895

0.2113

885

0.0256

880 (शास.रास्ता)

8972

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA- 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 1

875

0.1200

मेहतपुर(जारी.........

869

0.0636

876

0.1240

877

0.0010

867

0.0074

866

0.1225

914

0.0063

915

0.1058

923

0.1747

924

0.0864

925

0.0640

926

0.0245

927

0.0445

928

0.0627

930 (शास .रास्ता)

0.0173

942

0.0496

931

0.0156

937

0.2500

952

0.0091

296

0.2491

296/1230

0.1321

297

0.1222

288

0.0010

287

0.2409

299

0.0115

285

0.4215

0.0273

244 (शास . नाला)

243

0.0020

273

0.3271

272

0.1010

246

0.0816

247

0.1111

253

0.0206

252

0.1399

251

0.0372

265

0.3737

0.1018

1 (शास.न्ाला)

148

13 पिपलिया खेड़ी (जारी........

0.0929

146

0.2198

143

0.0514

144

0.0865

0.1277

0.0303

0.1322

0.0557

75(नदी)

[फा. सं . आर-31015/71/2004-ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 8973 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 5th August , 2005

S. O. 2765.-Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.769 , dated the 25th February , 2005, issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) published in the Gazette of India dated the 5th March , 2005 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying an extension pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai -Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Manglya ( Indore ) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 30th April , 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land , specified in the Schedule, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

TEHSIL : SUSNER

DISTRICT : SHAJAPUR

STATE : MADHYA PRADESH S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE

SURVEY NO .

AREA IN HECTARE

0.5240

NAHARKHERA

84(Govt. Land)

0.0259

85(River)

0.1320

86(Govt. Land)

0.1521

87(Govt. Land)

0.0305

83(River)

0.2365

0.1962

0.0512

77(River)

0.0306

0.1458

0.0557

0.0127

0.2237

0.3160

0.1656

0.0718

125

0.1977

127(Govt. Land)

0.0847

37(Govt . Land)

0.8671

2 UMARIYA

667(Govt. Land)

0.0327

132(Govt. Nala )

0.0327

120(Govt. Land)

0.0028

130(Govt . Land )

0.0274

134(Govt. Nala )

2211GI/2005-34 8974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6,2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

3 2 UMARIYA ( Contd ..... )

139(Govt. Land)

140(Govt. Land)

151(Govt. Land)

152(Govt. Land)

150(Govt. Land)

149(Govt. Land)

181(Govt . Nala )

180(Govt. Land)

161(Govt. Land)

164(Govt. Land)

165(Govt . Land )

173(Govt . Land)

177(Govt . Land)

166(Govt. Land) 3 PIPLIYA NANKAR

90(Govt. Land)

179(Govt. Land )

180(Govt. Land)

155( Govt. Rasta )

159

157

156

172(Govt. Nala)

139

141

140

145

152

146

148

149(Govt. Rasta)

346(Govt . Rasta )

345

340

339

338

337

426( Govt. Rasta )

428

429

430

461

458

459

456

452

451 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

0.0141

0.0547

0.2003

0.0005

0.0140

0.0084

0.0403

0.2865

0.0168

0.3590

0.0108

0.0100

0.5287

0.0055

0.0419

0.2270

0.6403

0.1152

0.2035

0.0426

0.0757

0.0133

0.0640

0.0114

0.2429

0.0342

0.0816

0.0572

0.0878

0.1862

0.0142

0.0061

0.8000

0.1215

0.0768

0.0103

0.0387

0.0664

0.1170

0.0808

0.0085

0.0811

0.0249

0.0697

0.0287

0.0456 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

450 3

447 PIPLIYA NANKAR (Contd ..... )

483(Govt . Nala)

626

625

624

624/1411(Govt. Land)

289 4

BAMNIYA KHEDI

275

276

277

293

292

301

302

304

305

353

363

366

365

367

371

372

379(Govt . Rasta )

413

412

411

414

417(Govt . Nala)

415

416

470

468/1255

469

468

467

471

466-

472

465

473

474

475

476

477

8975 4

0.0410

0.1058

0.0334

0.0881

0.0682

0.0106

0.0435

0.0090

0.0010

0.1097

0.0358

0.0010

0.2427

0.0212

0.0295

0.0111

0.0425

0.1704

0.1039

0.0180

0.0998

0.0224

0.0816

0.0842

0.0190

0.1028

0.0010

0.0200

0.0079

0.0213

0.0219

0.0381

0.0493

0.0140

0.0109

0.0158

0.0884

0.0181

0.0124

0.0823

0.1221

0.0031

0.1189

0.0203

0.0737

0.0716 8976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

3 4 BAMNIYA KHEDI

482

480 (Contd ..... )

481

364

485

483 5 MAINA

393

390.

392

389

1048( Govt. Rasta)

404

412

411

410

420

430

431

1032

1037( Govt . Rasta)

1023

1024

1025

1026

1012

980

982

983

984

993

994

992

991

1163

1159

1164

1957

1156

1154

1640( Govt . Nala)

1646

1647

1644

1757

1756

1755 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4

0.2028

0.1177

0.0152

0.0200

0.3000

0.0100

0.0032

0.2132

0.0034

0.0258

0.0313

0.0949

0.1854

0.1310

0.1122

0.0269

0.1483

0.0789

0.0010

0.0398

0.1812

0.1322

0.1154

0.0580

0.0874

0.1131

0.0876

0.0292

0.0745

0.0307

0.0767

0.0529

0.0424

0.0526

0.0615

0.0618

0.0633

0.0431

0.0085

0.0353

0.2185

0.0010

0.0196

0.0303

0.0837

0.0202 8977

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

3 1

1745 5 MAINA (Contd .....)

1746

1747

1749

1741

1778

1812

1813

1818

1819

1817

1820

1839

1837

1838

1840

1842

1843

1844

1860

1859

1861

1858

1972

1899

2001

2002

2003

2006

2004

2026

2017

2016

2015

2014

2018

2010(Govt. Land)

2012

1155

989

1013

432

391

981 6

731(Govt . Nala) BORKHEDI

481 4

0.0143

0.0653

0.1070

0.0131

0.0339

0.0162

0.0320

0.0063

0.0961

0.0039

0.0197

0.0750

0.0012

0.0412

0.0656

0.0220

0.0264

0.0224

0.0140

0.0193

0.1034

0.0124

0.0150

0.0102

0.1582

0.0985

0.0159

0.2050

0.0284

0.0466

0.0843

0.0625

0.0389

0.0456

0.1362

0.1327

0.0482

0.0400

0.0300

0.0200

0.0100

0.0400

0.0200

0.0491

0.5212 8978

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6. 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

3 6 BORKHEDI ( Contd..... )

477

482

475

476 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] 4

0.0375

0.0554

0.0200

0.0541

478(Govt. Nala )

90 0.0498

0.4114

109(Govt. Nala)

84 0.0147

0.3122

0.0356

0.0249

0.0407

0.0920

0.1495

0.0071

0.0292

0.0818

0.0467

0.1575

0.0538

0.0168

0.0709.

0.1253

0.0302

0.0192

0.1228

0.1930

0.0070

0.0986

0.1022

0.0184

0.0100

0.0400

85 (Govt. Nala)

7 GURADI

877

878

879. 0.0100

0.0002

0.2816

0.0566

401(Govt . Nala)

873

876

875

874

399 8 SHATRUKHEDI

54 0.0101

0.0151

0.2031

0.0002

0.0001

0.0040

0.0165

0.1784

0.1245 8979

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

53 8

SHATRUKHEDI ( Contd ... )

48(Govt . Nala)

26(Govt. Rasta)

99(Govt. Road )

231

737 9 MALANWASA

736

358(Govt . Nala)

293

294

303

302

323

324

300

336

337

339

251

250

344

243

345

242

347

233

232

234

227

222

221

220

217

214

213

212 4

0.0847

0.0195

0.2173

0.3374

0.0530

0.7861

0.0232

0.0641

0.1240

0.0016

0.4829

0.0315

0.3129

0.0016

0.0100

0.1599

0.1657

0.0497

0.0748

0.0418

0.0010

0.0977

0.0808

0.0822

0.0113

0.1447

0.0805

0.0786

0.0271

0.1035

0.0026

0.1235

0.0219

0.1168

0.0412

0.0865

0.0233

0.0212

0.1603

0.0823

0.0777

0.0147

0.1538

0.0897

0.0917

0.0300 8980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 2

10 NANORA

829

0.1041

830

0.0602

831

0.0586

833

0.0641

834

0.0032

818

0.1593

817

0.0792

842

0.0494

843

0.0524

0.0557

166(Govt. Nala)

169

0.0160

170

0.1697

144

0.1057

145

0.1269

147

0.1328

148

0.0849

149

0.1743

150

0.0537

152

0.0397

153

0.1010

0.0262

154(Govt . Nala)

749

0.0010

745

0.0600

748

0.0100

837

0.0100

841

0.0100

11 KADMI

0.0362

274( Govt . Rasta )

278

0.0946

279

0.0032

277

0.1021

268

0.1318

267

0.0474

266

0.0361

261

0.0185

262

0.0620

248

0.2183

242

0.1511

235

0.1092

241

0.0118

236

0.1530

237

0.1826

0.0475

104(Govt. Rasta)

112

0.0794

114

0.1115

116

0.0315

119

0.0621 8981

भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

120 11 KADMI (Contd ..... )

117(Govt. Rašta )

61(Govt. Nala)

602(Govt . Rasta)

538

546

547

571

570

577

568

567

566

589

591

593

608

609(Govt. Rasta )

617/827

610

274

263

238

113

115

122

897 12 MEHATPUR

893

894

895

885

880(Govt. Rasta ) 2211GI/2005-35

0.0830

0.0238

0.0119

0.0120,

0.0193

0.0677

0.1507

0.0058

0.0394

0.0106

0.0107

0.0599

0.0444

0.0516

0.0217

0.0565

0.2318

0.0924

0.1370

0.0672

0.1201

0.0739

0.1374

0.1662

0.2380

0.0873

0.1439

0.1868

0.0023

0.0477

0.0520

0.1572

0.0400

0.0200

0.0100

0.0400

0.0100

0.0300

0.0100

0.1566

0.0734

0.0841

0.1417

0.2113

0.0256 8982

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA, 15 , 1927

3 12 MEHATPUR

875 (Contd .....)

869

876

877

867

866

914

915

923

924

925

926

927

928

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

0.1200

0.0636

0.1240

0.0010

0.0074

0.1225

0.0063

0.1058

0.1747

0.0864

0.0640

0.0245

0.0445

0.0627

0.0173

930(Govt . Rasta)

942

931

937

952

296

296/1230

297

288

287

299

285

0.0496

0.0156

0.2500

0.0091

0.2491

0.1321

0.1222

0.0010

0.2409

0.0115

0.4215

0.0273

244(Govt. Nala)

243

273

272

246

247

253

252

251

265

0.0020

0.3271

0.1010

0.0816

0.1111

0.0206

0.1399

0.0372

0.3737

0.1018

1(Govt . Naia)

13 PIPLIYA KHEDI

148

146

143

144

75(River) 0.0929

0.2198

0.0514

0.0865

0.1277

0.0303

0.1322

0.0557

[No. R- 31015/71/2004-O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

8983 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2766.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 (1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त् अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii) तारीख 3 अप्रैल, 2004 में प्रकाशित जारी की गई थी, भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 818 तारीख 29 मार्च, 2004 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची मे विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में, जिसका माप 1285.970 हेक्टर (लगभग ) या 3177.63 एकड़ (लगभग) है, कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है, कि उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्य है ;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 810.32 हेक्टर (लगभग) या 2003.53 एकड़ (लगभग) माप की भूमि में सभी अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।

टिप्पणः- (1 ): इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या एसईसीएल / बीएसपी/ जीएम (पीएलजी) / भूमि / 296, तारीख 23 फरवरी , 2005 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर, सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता - 700 001 के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड (राजस्व अनुभाग ) सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर- 495006 (छत्तीसगढ़) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

टिप्पणः- (2): उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध हैः-

"अर्जन के प्रति आक्षेप 8:

(1)

कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में, जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है, हितबद्ध है, अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर संपूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्ही अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आक्षेप कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरणः- इस धारा के अर्थान्तर्गत यह आक्षेप नहीं माना जाएगा कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं कंन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए । 8984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II - SEC. 3 ( ii )] (2) उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक ने आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी आक्षेपकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसे सभी आक्षेपों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच , यदि कोई हो , करने के पश्चात् जो वह आवश्यक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आक्षेपों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा । (3) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता, यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते है । "

टिप्पण 3: केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता -700 001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2 , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 4 अप्रैल, 1987 के पृष्ठ 1397 से 1400 में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना सं. का आ. 905 , तारीख 20 मार्च, 1987 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया गया है ।

अनुसूची

आमगांव ओपनकास्ट प्रोजेक्ट

बिश्रामपुर क्षेत्र, जिला- सरगुजा (छत्तीसगढ़)

सभी अधिकार

क्रम संख्या

ग्राम का नाम

ग्राम नम्बर

पटवारी हल्का नम्बर 1

आमगॉव

65 2

पटना

350

66 3

साल्ही 432

66 4

कोटे

077

65 जिला

तहसील

टिप्पण

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

04.72 भाग

सूरजपुर सरगुजा

भाग

सूरजपुर सरगुजा 507.89

भाग

सूरजपुर सरगुजा 289.64

भाग

08.57

सूरजपुर सरगुजा

कुलयोगः- 810.82 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 2003.53 एकड़ (लगभग)

1. ग्राम आमगांव (भाग) मे अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांकः-

421 (भाग) , 422, 423, 424 (भाग) , 425 (भाग ), 442(भाग ) , 443 (भाग), 444 (भाग), 446 (भाग ), 447 (भाग ) , 448 से 452, 453 (भाग) , 461 (भाग) , 463 (भाग) , 2. ग्राम पटना (भाग) मे अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांकः-

112(भाग) , 113(भाग) , 116(भाग) , 117 (भाग) , 118 से 134, 135 (भाग) , 136 (

भाग) , 137 (भाग) , 145 (भाग) , 146 (भाग) , 147 ( भाग) , 148, 149(भाग) , 168 (भाग) , 169 से 191, 192 (भाग) , 193 से 205, 206 (भाग ) , 207 ( भाग) , 208 8985

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(भाग) , 209 से 213, 214 (भाग) , 215 (भाग) , 216 (भाग) , 217 (भाग) , 219 (भाग ) , 221 (भाग) , 229 (भाग) , 231 (भाग), 232 से 244, 245 (भाग) , 246 (भाग) , 253 (भाग), 254 (भाग) , 255 से 260, 261 (भाग) , 262 से 266, 267 (भाग) , 268 से 282,283 (भाग) , 284 (भाग) , 287 (भाग) , 344 (भाग ) , 350 (भाग) , 353 (भाग) , 354, 355 (भाग) , 356 (भाग) , 358 (भाग) , 359 (भाग ), 360 से 363, 364 (भाग), 365 (भाग) , 366 से 372, 373 (भाग) , 374, 375 (भाग), 376 से 380, 381 (भाग ) , 382से 396, 397 (भाग) , 398 से 435, 436 (भाग) , 437 (भाग) , 439 (भाग) , 440 (भाग), 449(भाग) , 450 से 454, 455 (भाग) , 456(भाग) , 465 (भाग) , 466 से 473, 474 (भाग); 476 (भाग), 477, 478 (भाग) , 490 (भाग), 494 (भाग) , 495,496, 497 (भाग) , 498 (भाग) , 499(भाग) , 500 (भाग) , 502 (भाग),503 (भाग) , 504 (भाग) , 505 (भाग) , 506 (भाग) , 507 से 515, 516 ( भाग) , 517 से 559, 560 (भाग), 562 (भाग) , 564 (भाग) , 565 से 602, 603 (भाग ) , 604 (भाग), 607 (भाग) , 609 (भाग) , 614 (भाग) , 615 (भाग) , 616 (भाग) , 617, 618 (भाग) , 654 (भाग), 655 (भाग) , 659 (भाग) , 660 से 663, 664 (भाग ) , 665, 666 (भाग ) , 667 से 1515, 1516 (भाग) , 1517 (भाग) , 1518 से 1550, 1551 (भाग), 1554 (भाग) , 1555, 1556, 1557 (भाग) , 1568 (भाग), 1585 (भाग ), 1586 (भाग) , 1587 (भाग) , 1588 से 1612, 1613 (भाग) , 1614 से 1623, 1624 (भाग ), 1625, 1626 (भाग), 1629 (भाग) , 1631 (भाग) , 1632 (भाग) , 1633 से 1636, 1637 (भाग), 1645 (भाग ), 1646 से 1669, 1670 (भाग) , 1671 (भाग) , 1006/1679, 180/1682, 953/1683, 910/1684, 948/1685.244/1686, 454/1687, 734/1688 , 1078/1693.

3. ग्राम साल्ही ( भाग) मे अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांकः-

92 (भाग) , 93, 94, 95 (भाग) , 96 (भाग) , 97 (भाग ) , 98 (भाग) , 99 (भाग), 114 (भाग) , 115 से 138, 139(भाग) , 142(भाग) , 145 (भाग), 160(भाग ),613 (भाग) ,614 (भाग) , 615, 616 (भाग) , 618 (भाग) ,619 (भाग) , 635 (भाग ), 636 से 638, 794 (भाग) , 795 (भाग) , 796, 797, 798 (भाग) , 799 से 853, 854(भाग) , 855 (भाग), 886(भाग) ,888 (भाग), 889 (भाग) ,890 (भाग), 894 (भाग) ,895 (भाग) , 896 (भाग) , 897 से 945, 946 (भाग) ,947 से 1007, 1008 (भाग ) , 1009 (भाग) , 1010 से 1026, 1027 (भाग) , 1028 (भाग) , 1031 (भाग),1032 (भाग) , 1033 (भाग) , 1036 (भाग) , 1037, 1038, 1039(भाग) , 1040 से 1045, 1046 (भाग) , 1047 (भाग),1048 (भाग) , 1074 (भाग) , 1076 (भाग) , 1081 (भाग) , 1082 (भाग) , 1083, 1084(भाग) , 1085 से 1102, 1103 (भाग) , 1104 से 1113, 1114 (भाग), 1115 से 1117 , 1118 (भाग ) , 1119 (भाग), 1120 (भांग), 1121 से 1318 , 1319 (भाग) ,1320(भाग) , 1321, 1322, 1323 (भाग) , 1327 (भाग), 1328 (भाग) ,1329 (भाग) , 1330 (भाग) , 1331 से 1360, 1362 (भाग ), 1363 (भाग), 1365 (भाग) , 1366 (भाग) , 1369(भाग) , 1418 (भाग) , 1419 से 1422, 1433 (भाग) , 1434, 1435 1436 (भाग) , 1438 (भाग), 1439 (भाग) , 1440 (भाग) , 1725 (भाग) , 1726(भाग) , 1727, 1728 (भाग) ,1729(भाग) , 1730 (भाग), 1731 (भाग) , 1741 (भाग) , 1742 (भाग), 1743 (भाग), 1744 (भाग) , 1745 (भाग) , 1746 (भाग) , 1747 से 1805, 1806 (भाग) , 1807, 1808, 1809 (भाग) , 1810 (भाग ) , 1811 (भाग ), 1815 (भाग) , 1816 (भाग) , 1824 (भाग) , 1829 (भाग) , 1830(भाग) , 1831 (भाग), 1832(भाग) , 1833 (भाग), 1834 (भाग) , 1835 (भाग) , 1836 से 1848, 1849 (भाग) , 1850 से 1852, 1853 8986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) } (भाग) , 1855 (भाग), 1856 से 1860, 1861 (भाग) ,1864 (भाग) , 1865(भाग) , 1871 (भाग) , 1872, 1873 (भाग) , 1874 (भाग) , 1878 (भाग) , 1888 (भाग) , 1889, 1890, 1891 , 1892, 1893 से 1895, 1896(भाग) , 1897 से 1903, 1904(भाग) , 1905, 1906 ( भाग) , 1907 (भाग ) , 1908 (भाग) , 1910 (भाग) ,

4. ग्राम कोट (भाग) मे अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांकः-

$47 (भाग) , 550 ( भाग) , 553 (भाग) , 554 (भाग) , 555 से 567, 568 (भाग) , 569, 571 (भाग), 572, 573 (भाग) , 574 (भाग) , 575 (भाग ) , 576, 577 (भाग) , 580 (भाग) , 581 (भाग) ,

सीमा वर्णन

क-क1-क2 रेखा ग्राम कोट पटना की सम्मिलित सीमा से बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती और ग्राम कोट में प्लाट संख्या 568,550, 553, 554, 547 , 577 , 580, 581 . 575. 574, 573, 571 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " क 2 " पर मिलती है ।

क2-ख

रेखा ग्राम पटना में प्लाट संख्या 604, 603, 607, 609, 614, 615, 616, 618, 659, 664, 666 , 655, 1551 , 1554, 654, 1568, 1557, 1517 , 1516, 1517, 1585, 1586, 1587 से होकर गुजरती है । और बिन्दु "ख " पर मिलती है ।

ख -ख1-2 रेखा ग्राम आमगांव में प्लाट संख्या 421 , 424, 425, 443, 442, 444, 446, 463, 447,461 , 453 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ख 2 " पर मिलती है ।

ख2 - ग

रेखा ग्राम पटना में प्लाट संख्या 1613, 1626, 1629 , 1624, 1631 , 1632, 1637, 1645, 1670 , 1671 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है। ग- ग 1 -ग2 रेखा ग्राम साल्ही में प्लांट संख्या 1439, 1438, 946, 1436, 1440, 1433, प्लाट संख्या 1422, 1421 की उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 1418, प्लाट संख्या 1360 की उत्तरी सीमा से होकर, प्लाट संख्या 1362, 1363, 1365, 1369 , 1365 , 1366, 1330 , 1329 , 1328, 1327 , 1323, 1320, 1725, 1726, 1728, 1729, 1319 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु "ग2" पर मिलती है ।

ग2- ग 3-ग4 रेखा ग्राम साल्ही में प्लाट संख्या 1319, 1730 , 1731 , 1741 , 1742, 1743, 1744, 1745, 1746, 1811 , 1810 , 1809 , 1815, 1806, 1815 , 1816, 1835, 1824, 1833, 1834, 1832, 1831 , 1830, 1829, से होकर गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 1829, 1896 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ- साथ होती हुई बिन्दु "म4" में मिलती है ।

ग4 -ग5- ग6 रेखा ग्राम साल्ही मे प्लाट संख्या 1896, 1907, 1908, 1907, 1910, 1906, 1904, 1888 , 1874, 1873, 1878, 1871 , 1861 , 1864, 1865, 1855, 8987

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005 / श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1849, 1853, 613, 614, 616 , 1103, 618 , 619 , 635 , प्लाट संख्या 636, 637, 638 की दक्षिणी सीमा से होकर फिर प्लाट संख्या 1084, 1082, 1081 , 1114, 1118, 1120, 1119 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ग 6 " पर मिलती है ।

ग6 -ग7 -ग8 रेखा ग्राम साल्ही में प्लाट संख्या 1119, 1076, 1120, 1074, 1046 , 1047, 1048 , 1039 , 1036 , 1033 , 1032, 1031 , 1028 , 1027, 1009, 1008 , 886, 888, 889 , 890,896 , 894, 895 , 854, 855, 798 , 794, 795, 142, 139, 145, 160, 114, 95, 99, 98, 97, 96, 92 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ग४ " पर मिलती है ।

ग8 -घ

रेखा ग्राम पटना में प्लाट संख्या 365, 373 , 364, 353 , 350, 356 , 355, 359, 358, 344, 375, 381 , 221 , 214, 215, 216, 217, 219 , 208, 207, 206, 229, 231 , 246, 245, 246, 192, 254, 253, 254, 261 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है ।

घ-ड्र

रेखा ग्राम पटना में प्लाट संख्या 261 , 287, 267, 284, 283 , 397 , 168 , 149, 146, 147, 145 , 135, 136, 137, 116 , 117, 113 , 112, 436 , 437, 439, 440, 449, 455, 456, 465, 478, 476 , 474,490, 494, 497 , 498, 499,500, 516 , 502, 503 , 504, 505, 506 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दुः "ड़ " पर मिलती है ।

इ-क

रेखा ग्राम पटना में प्लाट संख्या 506 से, प्लाट संख्या 560, की उत्तरी सीमा से होकर फिर प्लाट संख्या 560, 562, 564 से होकर गुजरती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु " क" पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. आर-43015/ 13/2003 - पी.आर.आई.डब्ल्यू. ]

बी. के. पण्डा निदेशक

Ministry of Coal

New Delhi , the 22nd July, 2005

S. O. 2766.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coalnumber S.O. 818 dated the 29th March, 2004 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in Part - II , section - 3 , sub- section (ii) of the Gazette of India dated the 3rd April , 2004, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 1285.970 hectares (approximately ) or 3177.63 acres (approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification;

And, whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 7 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 810.82 hectares (approximately) or 2003.53 acres ( approximately ) in all rights in the schedule appended hereto .

8988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Notę 1- The plan bearing No. SECL/BSP / GM ( Plg ) / Land/296 dated the 23rd February , 2005 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector , Surguja ( Chhattisgarh ) or in the Office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata 700 001 or in the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Section ) , Seepat Road , Bilaspur- 495006 (Chhattisgarh) .

Note 2- Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the said Act, which provides as follows : -

Objections to Acquisition :

"8 ( 1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued may , within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land .

Explanation : It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.

Every objection under sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry , if any , as he thinks necessary , either makes a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land , or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendation on the objections together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of that Government .

(2) For the purpose of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act. "

Note 3 . The Coal Controller , 1, Council House Street , Kolkata- 700 001 has been appointed by the Central Government , as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification under S.O.905 , dated the 20th March , 1987 , published in Part - II , Section -3 , sub- section ( ii ) of the gazette of India, dated the 4th April , 1987 at pages 1397 to 1400 .

Schedule

Amgaon Opencast project, Bisrampur area

District - Surguja ( Chhattisgarh)

All rights

Tahsil District

Remarks Serial number

Village number

Name of village

Area in Hectares

Patwari halka number

Amgaon

Part

04.72

Surajpur Surguja

350

Patna

507.89

Part

Surajpur

Surguja

Salhi

432

Part

289.64

Surajpur Surguja

Kote

077

Part

08.57

Surajpur Surguja

Total : 810.82 hectares ( approximately ) or 2003.53 acres ( approximately) 8989 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Amgaon (Part ):

421 (Part ) , 422, 423 , 424 (Part ) , 425 (Part ), 442(Part ) , 443 (Part ) , 444 (Part ), 446 (Part), 447 (Part ), 448 to 452, 453 (Part) , 461 (Part ), 463 (Part ) ,

2. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Patna (Part):

112 (Part) , 113 (Part), 116 (Part), 117 (Part), 118 to 134, 135 (Part) , 136 (Part), 137 (Part), 145 (Part) , 146 (Part) , 147 (Part), 148, 149 (Part ), 168 (Part), 169 to 191 , 192 (Part), 193 to 205 , 206 (Part) , 207 (Part ), 208 (Part ), 209 to 213 , 214 (Part), 215 (Part), 216 (Part) , 217 (Part ), 219 (Part), 221 (Part) , 229 (Part ) , 231 (Part ), 232 to 244, 245 (Part), 246 (Part) , 253 (Part) , 254 (Part), 255 to 260, 261 (Part), 262 to 266, 267 (Part), 268 to 282,283 (Part), 284 (Part), 287 (Part ) , 344 (Part) , 350 (Part), 353 (Part) , 354, 355 (Part) , 356 (Part) , 358 (Part) , 359 (Part), 360 to 363 , 364 (Part) , 365 (Part) , 366 to 372, 373 (Part), 374, 375 (Part ) , 376 to 380 , 381 (Part ), 382 to 396, 397 (Part ), 398 to 435, 436 (Part) , 437 (Part ), 439 (Part) , 440 (Part ), 449(Part) , 450 to 454, 455 (Part ), 456 465 (Part), 466 to 473 , 474 (Part), 476 (Part ), 477, 478 (Part ), 490 (Part ), 494 (Part ), 495 , 496, 497 (Part), 498 (Part), 499 (Part) , 500 (Part) , 502 (Part) , 503 (Part ), 504 (Part) , 505 (Part ) , 506 (Part) , 507 to 515 , 516 (Part) , 517 to 559, 560 (Part ) , 562 (Part), 564 (Part ), 565 to 602, 603 (Part), 604 (Part) , 607 (Part ) , 609 (Part), 614 (Part) , 615 (Part), 616 (Part) , 617 , 618 (Part) , 654 (Part ), 655 (Part) , 659 (Part) , 660 to 663 , 664 (Part) , 665 , 666 (Part) , 667 to 1515, 1516 (Part ), 1517 (Part) , 1518 to 1550 , 1551 (Part) , 1554 (Part) , 1555, 1556, 1557 (Part) , 1568 (Part), 1585 (Part) , 1586 (Part), 1587 (Part), 1588 to 1612, 1613 (Part), 1614 to 1623 , 1624 (Part ) , 1625, 1626 (Part), 1629 (Part) , 1631 (Part), 1632 (Part), 1633 to 1636, 1637 (Part), 1645 (Part) , 1646 to 1669, 1670 (Part) , 1671 (Part ), 1006/1679 , 180/1682 , 953/1683 , 910/1684, 948/1685.244/1686, 454/1687 , 734/1688 , 1078/1693 .

3. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Salhi (Part) :

92 (Part) , 93 , 94, 95 (Part ) ,96 (Part ) ,97 (Part) ,98 (Part) ,99 (Part) , 114 (Part ), 115 to 138 , 139 (Part), 142 (Part), 145 (Part), 160(Part),613 (Part ), 614 (Part), 615 , 616 (Part ) , 618 (Part), 619 (Part) , 635 (Part) , 636 to 638 , 794 (Part) , 795 (Part ) , 796, 797 , 798 ( Part) , 799 to 853 , 854 ( Part ) , 855 (Part ) , 886 (Part) , 888 (Part) , 889 (Part) , 890 (Part) , 894 (Part ), 895 (Part) , 896 (Part) , 897 to 945, 946 (Part),947 to 1007, 1008 (Part ) , 1009 (Part), 1010 to 1026, 1027 (Part), 1028 (Part) , 1031 (Part) , 1032 (Part ), 1033 (Part), 1036 (Part ), 1037 , 1038 , 1039 (Part ), 1040 to 1045, 1046 (Part ) , 1047 (Part) , 1048 (Part), 1074 (Part) , 1076 (Part) , 1081 (Part), 1082 (Part) , 1083, 1084(Part) , 1085 to 1102, 1103 (Part), 1104 to 1113 , 1114 (Part), 1115 to 1117, 1118 (Part) , 1119 (Part ) , 1120 (Part) , 1121 to 1318 , 1319 (Part ) , 1320(Part), 1321 , 1322, 1323 (Part), 1327 (Part ), 1328 (Part ) , 1329 (Part), 1330 (Part), 1331 to 1360, 1362 (Part), 1363 (Part) , 1365 (Part), 1366(Part), 1369 (Part) , 1418 (Part) , 1419 to 1422, 1433 (Part), 1434, 1435 1436 (Part), 1438 (Part), 1439 (Part), 1440 (Part), 1725 (Part), 1726 (Part ) , 1727 , 1728 (Part), 1729(Part ) , 1730 (Part) , 1731 (Part), 1741 (Part ), 1742 (Part) , 1743 (Part ) , 1744 (Part), 1745 (Part ) , 1746 (Part ), 1747 to 1805, 1806 (Part), 1807, 1808, 1809 (Part), 1810 (Part) , 1811 (Part) , 1815 (Part), 1816 (Part) , 1824 ( Part), 1829 (Part), 1830 (Part) , 1831 (Part), 1832 (Part) , 1833 (Part), 1834 (Part) , 1835 (Part) , 1836 to 1848, 1849 (Part ), 1850 to 1852, 1853 (Part) , 1855 (Part) , 1856 to 1860, 1861 (Part), 1864 (Part) , 1865 (Part) , 1871 (Part) , 1872, 1873 (Part), 1874 (Part), 1878 (Part), 1888 (Part), 1889, 1890, 1891 , 1892 , 1893 to 1895 , 1896 (Part ) , 1897 to 1903 , 1904 (Part) , 1905, 1906 (Part), 1907 (Part), 1908 (Part), 1910 (Part) ,

2211GI/2005-36 8990

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( i ) ] 4. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Kote (Part) :

547 (Part) , 550 (Part ) , 553 (Part) , 554 (Part), 555 to 567, 568 ( Part ) , 569 , 571 (Part),572, 573 (Part) , 574 (Part ) , 575 (Part) , 576 , 577 (Part) , 580 (Part ) , 581 (Part), Boundary description: -

A-A1 -A2 Line starts from point " A" on the common boundary of village kote - Patna and passes in village kote through plot numbers 568 , 550 , 553 , 554, 547 , 577 , 580 , 581.575.574.573.571 and meets at point "A2 " .

A2-B

Line passes in village Patna through Plot numbers 604, 603 , 607, 609 , 614, 615, 616, 618 , 659, 664, 666, 655 , 1551 , 1554, 654 , 1568 , 1557 , 1517, 1516, 1517, 1585 , 1586 , 1587 , and meets at point "B ".

B- B1 -B2 Line passes in village Amgaon through plot numbers 421 , 424 , 425 , 443 , 442, 444,446, 463, 447,461 , 453 and meets at point " B2 " .

B2- C

Line passes in village patna through plot numbers 1613 , 1626 , 1629 , 1624 , 1631; 1632, 1637, 1645, 1670 , 1671 and meets at point ' C' .

C-C1 -C2

> Line passes in villages Salbi through plot numbers 1439, 1438, 946, 1436, 1440 , 1433 , Northern boundary of plot numbers 1422 , 1421 then through plot numbers 1418 Northern boundary of plot number 1360 through plot numbers 1362 , 1363 , 1365 , 1369, 1365 , 1366, 1330, 1329 , 1328 , 1327 , 1323 , 1320, 1725 , 1726, 1728 , 1729, 1319 and meet at point " C2" .

C2-C3 -C4 Line passes in village Salhi through plot numbers 1319, 1730, 1731 , 1741 , 1742, 1743 , 1744 , 1745 , 1746 , 1811 , 1810, 1809 , 1815 , 1806, 1815, 1816 , 1835 , 1824 , 1833 , 1834, 1832, 1831 , 1830 , 1829, then along the Eastern boundary of plot numbers 1829 , 1896 and meets at point " C4" .

C4-C5 -C6 Line passes in village Salhi through plot numbers 1896, 1907 , 1908 , 1907 , 1910, 1906, 1904, 1888, 1874, 1873 , 1878 , 1871 , 1861 , 1864, 1865 , 1855, 1849 , 1853 , 613 , 614, 616, 1103 , 618 , 619, 635 Southern boundary of plot numbers 636, 637 , 638 then through plot numbers 1084, 1082, 1081, 1114, 1118 , 1120. 1119 and meet at point " C6 " ..

C6-C/-C8 Line passes in village Salhi through Plot numbers 1119 , 1076, 1120, -1074, 1046, 1047 , 1048 , 1039 , 1036 , 1033 , 1032 , 1031 , 1028 , 1027 , 1009, 1008 , 886 , 888 , 889 , 890,896 , 894, 895, 854, 855 , 798, 794, 795, 142, 139, 145, 160, 114, 95, 99, 98. 97.96.92 and meet at point "C8" .

C8 -D

Line passes in vinage patna through plot numbers 365 , 373 , 364, 353 , 350, 356, 355 , 359 , 358 , 344, 375 , 381 , 221 , 214 , 215, 216, 217 , 219 , 208 , 207, 206 , 229, 231.246, 245, 246, 192 , 254, 253 , 254, 261 and meets at point " D" .

D-E

Line passes in village patna through plot numbers 261 , 287 , 267, 284, 283 , 397 , 168, 149, 146, 147, 145, 135, 136, 137 , 116, 117, 113, 112, 436, 437, 439, 440, 449, 455, 456, 465, 478, 476, 474,490, 494, 497, 498 , 499,500, 516, 502, 503 , 504, 505 , 506 and meets at point "E" .

E-A

Line passes in village patna through plot numbers 506 northerr boundary of plot number 560 , then through plot number 560, 562 , 564 and meets at the starting point " А ".

[No143015/13/2003-PRIW] B. K. PANDA , Director 8991 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

श्रम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 7 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2767.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 36/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011 /40/200Q- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi , the 7th July, 2005

S.O. 2767.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 36/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , received by the Central Government on 7-7-2005.

[No. L- 12011/40/2000- IR. (B- 1 ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy:

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT BANGALORE

Dated : 30th June , 2005

Present : Shri A. R. Siddiqui , PresidingOfficer

C. R. No. 36/2000

IIParty

1Party

The Dy. Managing Director,

SyndicateBank ,

Head Office , Distt . Udupi Manipal -576 119 (Karnataka State)

The General Secretary Syndicate Bank Staff Association , Anand Plaza, 2nd Floor , Near Anand Rao Circle,Bangalore- 560009

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub - section 2 A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 12011 /40/2000/IR (B - II) dated 12th June , 2000 for adjudication on the following schedule :

Gandhibagh, Nagpur branch and thereafter it was found that these two demand draft leaves actually pertained to Chamarajnagar branch of the Bank and investigation was taken up. It is his case that the management during the investigation obtained from him a confessional letter dated 28-6-95 while he was working as an Attender at Chamarajnagar branch on the ground that he was responsible for the ilfering of certain DD leaves which were used for the attempted fraudulent encashment of 2 demand drafts by the outsiders . He contended that the above said confessional letter was obtained from him under coercion and threat and he was suspended from the services by order dated 5-9-95 . He was issued with the charge sheet dated 16-4-1997 on the allegation that he committed acts prejudicial to the interest of the management bank . He denied the charges by his reply dated 5-6-97 and then he was reinstated into the service by order dated 28-1-98 .He contendedthat thereafter a departmental enquiry was held against him into the aforesaid charge sheet and the Enquiry Officer submitted hic curt dated 14-3-1998 holding him guilty of the charges leveled against him. He was given the personal hearing by the Disciplinary Authority on 10-6-98 and the aut ty by its order dated 21-7-98 dismissedhim from service h immediate effect . The appeal preferred byhim was dismissed by order dated 15-12-98 after giving him opportunity of personal hearing . He contended that the above confessional letter has been drafted inapeccable English and his signature has been obtained on the said letter and that letter alone he hasbeen held gui ay of the charges of misconduct ; that the defence taken by the first party during the course ofenquiry with regard to the above said letter has not been demolished despite his lengthy cross examination by the management representative; that the rep of the Enquiry Officer is one sided and his findings are perverse and the reasons given by him holding the first party workman guilty are not valid and supported by evidence therefore, the enquiry report is perverse in as much as the finding of Enquiry Officer holding that the above said confessional statement was a voluntary statement is correct; that the opportunity was not given tothe first partyin defending his case and there is flagrant violation of principles of natural justice in conducting the enquiry; that the past record of the First party is excellent and unblemished having served the bank for more than 25 years at various branches of the bank and that despite the fact that charge was not proved in the Domestic Enquiry, he has been dismissed from service on the basis of the perverse findings of the enquiry officer. Therefore , he requested the court to pass an award for his reinstatement with all consequential benefits .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Syndicate Bank is justified in terminating the services of Shri Gurumallaiah, Former Attender? If not , what relief the workman is entitled for ? "

2. The managment by its Counter Statement challenged the claim of the first party and the averments made by him in his Claim Statement. The various contentions taken by the management in their Counter Statement at Para 3 to 18 are as under :-

Para 3 - that Shri Gurumallaiah wa working as Attender at Chamarajnagar Branch o. the Second PartyBank from October, 1986. He was placed under 2.The case of the first party workman, as made out in the Clairn Statement , briefly, stated is that in the month of February, 1995 the management came across an incident of attempted fraudulent encashment of two demand drafts at 8992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

suspension on 5-9-1995 . The following incidentwas reported:

Demand Draft No. 712672/135 dated 16-1-1995 for Rs. 9.85 lacs favouring on J. Jone and Demand Draft No. 712673/180 dated 20-1-1995 for Rs . 8.94 lacs favouring " Jhone Plastics " were presented for payment to Gandhibagh Branch , Nagpur of the SecondPartyBank in clearing through Central Bank of India , Kingsway, Nagpur Branch . The said Demand Draft appeared to have issued by Bhandra Branch of the Second Party Bank. As the Nagpur Branch developed certain doubts, they checked with regard to the issuance of said Demand Drafts with Bhandra Branch and came to know that the said Branch never issued such Demand Drafts . The matter was subsequently taken up with the Second Party Bank'sHead Office , Stationery and Record Department, Manipal . It then came to the light that the said Demand Drafts were issued to the Chamarajnagar Branch of the Second Party Bank. Oninvestigation, it further came to be known that the following Demand Drafts/Pay Order leaves were missing:

① MICR Demand Draft leaves MDC 712671 to 712689 with drawee branch name pre -printed as Gandhibagh- Nagpur.

(ii) MICR Demand Draft leaves 737671 to 737680 with drawee branch name pre -printed as Guwahati Branch.

(iii) MICR Demand Draft leaves MDC 662671 to 662680 with drawee branch name pre-printed as Baroda Mandvi Branch .

(iv) Pay Order Pad bearing No. 248751 to 248800 when the matter was further investigated , Shri Gurumallaiah , made a Voluntary Confessional Statement on 28-6-95 in the presence of two officials at Divisional Office , Mysore as detailed under:-

(a) That Shri Gurumallaiah came into contact with one Shri Manoharchandra , a clerk ofThitimathi Branch of the Second Party Bank and he introduced him to certain outsiders . These outsiders wanted certainDemand Draft Leaves for certain financial consideration .

(b) Shri Gurumallaiah handed over a Pay Order Book to one Shri Sudhakara through Shri Manoharchandra.

(c) The outsiders wanted Shri Gurumallaiah to get Demand Draft Pad only, for a consideration of Rs . 50,000/- . The outsiders retained the Pay Order Book withthem.

(d) Shri Gurumallaiah , took out three Demand Draft Pads and handed over to

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] Shri Manoharchandra for passing of to the said outsiders .

(e) The outsiders returned the Demand Draft Pads/Pay Order to him under the pretext that Demand Draft Pad of a particular specimen only was wanted.

While replacing the returned Demand Draft Pads /Pay Orders, it was noticed that certain Demand Draft leaves and Pay Order leaves were missing. (f)

For the above acts , Shri Gurumallaiah was placed under suspension by an order dated 5-9-1995 under Clause 19.12 (b) of the Bipartite Settlement governing suspension pending / initiation of Enquiry.

Para4: that the aforesaid acts of Shri Gurumullaiah amounted to gross Misconduct under Clause 19.5 (j ) of the Bi -Partite Settlement, he was rightly charge sheeted for "Doing Acts Prejudicial to the interest ofthe Bank" .

Para 5 :- that it is a blatant lie to say that the Second Party Bank Management obtained a confessional letter dated 28-6-1995 from the Shri Gurumallaiah who wasworking as an attender at Chamarajnagar Branch informing inter alia that he was responsible for the pilfering of certain DD leaves which were used for the attempted fraudulent encashment of two Demand Drafts by the outsiders stated above . One the contrary, Shri Gurumallaiah himself gave a voluntary confessional letter to the Second Party Bank admitting his misconduct .

Para 6 : that Shri Gurumallaiah was placed under suspension pending/ initiation of Departmental enquiry. It is again a blatant lie that because he denied the charges vide his reply dated 5-6-1997 , he was reinstated into the services of the bank at Regional Office , Bijapur vide reinstatement order dated 28-1-1998.

Para 7 :- that the explanation given to the charge sheet was not satisfactory, a Departmental Enquiry was ordered and Shri Gurumallaiah fully and actively participated in the Departmental Enquiry along with Shri D. S. Veeraiah , President of All India SC/ ST Association as his Defence Representative .

Para 8: that the enquiry officer so appointed to conduct the Departmental enquiry in consonance withPrinciples ofNatural Justice and in accordance with the provisions of the Bi - Partite Settlement . After carefully analyzing the oral and documentary evidence that are produced before him, the Enquiry Officer rightly came to the conclusion that the charges leveled against Shri Gurumallaiah are proved and accordingly submitted his report to the Disciplinary Authority holding Shri Gurumallaiah guilty.

8993

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005 /श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Para 9: that the Disciplinary Authority afforded

Justice. Since there is no specific allegation ofdenial of due opportunity or flagrant violation ofPrinciple ofnatural Justice by the Enquiry Officer, in the Claim Statement, the same deserves to be condemned.

an opportunity of personal hearing to Shri Gurumallaiah. After considering the submissions of Shri Gurumallaiah and the papers that are produced before him, rightly passed an order dismissing Shri Gurumallaiah from the services of Second Party Bank which is just and proper . The order of dismissal is theappropriate and most suitable punishment to the Gravity of the misconduct committed by Shri Gurumallaiah.

Para14:- that though the charge was not proved in theDomestic Enquiry and that Shri Gurumallaiah was dismissed from the services on the perverse finding ofthe Enquity Officer. On the other hand, charges were proved in the Departmental Enquiry and the punishment of dismissal from the services of the second party bank is most appropriate and correct punishment that can be given to the serious misconduct that is committed by the Shri Gurumallaiah.

Para 10 :- that Shri Gurumallaiah preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority against the order of the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority afforded an opportunity of Personal Hearing to Shri Gurumallaiah . The Appellate Authority after considering the submissions that are made by Shri Gurumallaiah during the course of Personal Hearing and after carefully studying the papers that are produced before him rightly came to the conclusion that there is no merit in the Appeal filed by Shri Gurumallaiah. Since the Misconduct committedby Shri Gurumallaiah was so grave for which dismissal is the only appropriate punishment that can be given, the Appellate Authority rightly confirmed the order of the Disciplinary Authority dismissing Shri Gurumallaiah from the services of the Second Party Bank.

Para 15 : that no one can miss the constitutional perception to which the Banking Industry is beholden, namely, to secure and humane conditions of work and creation of congenial working atmoshphere . At once , the industry and all its components must strive towards excellence, so that the banking industry rises to higher levels of endeavor and achievement . Excellence is not achieved except with a deep sense of commitment to work and discipline . Diluting discipline and condoning indiscipline would only destroy motivation . Loyalty to work and discipline among the employees of the Second Party Bank are two important factors for the existence of the Second Party Bank. Any misguided sympathy is no more than a maudlin sentiment that may prove fatal for the existence of Second Party Bank . The Second Party Bank management has imposed a just and proper punishment for the concerned workman for the grave misconduct committed by him . The punishment is very much in accordance with the gravity of misconduct committed by him and the same is not to be interferedby this court .

Para 11 : that the grounds that are urged in the claim statement are all false and misleading. It is not amust that the knowledge of English of an attender should be minimal . The contention in the Claim Statement that the confessional letter dated 28-6-95 isobtained through the help of CBI men is nothing butan after thought and deserves to be condemned. The said claim is a false statement made to gain undue sympathy from this court and deserves to be condemned.

Para 12: that it is not true to saythat the Report of

Para 16:-that Shri Gurumallaiah has been dismissed for the proved misconduct . The punishment is imposed after extending all reasonable and fair opportunities to the Shri Gurumallaiah to defend himself in the enquiry and in subsequent proceedings. Since the punishment of dismissal imposed is not by way ofvictimization or unfair labour practices and it is prayed that the same is not to be interfered in any manner.

Para 17:- that the allegations that are not specifically admitted are generally denied and the first party is putto strict proof of the same.

the Enquiry Officer is one sided and his findings are perverse. On the other hand, the Enquiry Officer has considered the oral and documentary evidence that is produced before him in the Departmental Enquiry and submitted a meaningful and purposeful report . In the Departmental Enquiry, the Second Party Management examined 5 witnesses and relied on 7 documents . All the Management witnesses were extensively cross examined by the Defence . In the Departmental Enquiry, Shri Gurumallaiah was got examined himself and produced a document. Since the Enquiry Officer has taken all the aspects into consideration before submitting his Enquiry Report it isnot correct to say that the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse or one sided.

Para 18:- that the Second PartyManagement at the first instance relies on the Domestic Enquiry conducted in respect of charges levelled against the first party. In case for any reasons , this court is to cometo the conclusion that the Domestic Enquiry is not fair and proper, the second party management maybe permitted to lead fresh evidence before this court to establish the charges against the first party. It is prayed that the reference may be rejected and an Para 13 that due opportunity was given to the Defenceto present their case . In the Claim Statement, there is no mention as to what due opportunity was denied to him . Even there is no mention as to how there is flagrant violation of Principle of Natural 8994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 6. 2005 /SRAVANA 15. 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] Award may be passed in favour of the Second Party Bank.

evidence . Therefore , he submitted that by no stretch of imagination it can be said that the findings suffered from perversity so as to seek inference at the hands of this tribunal .

3. Keeping view the respective contentions of the parties, with regard to the fairness and validity or other wiseof the enquiry proceedings conducted by the Second Party against the first party, this court on 31-3-2004 framed the following Preliminary Issue:-

"Whether the Domestic Enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second Party was Fair and Proper?"

7. On going through the enquiry findings marked before this tribunal at Ex . M4 , I find substance in the arguments advanced by the management . In order to appreciate the various contentions taken by the Inanagement and so also the contention taken by the first party it is worthwhile to bring on record the very observations and reasonings assigned by the Enquiry Officer in coming to the Conclusion that first party was responsible for the misconduct alleged. On pages 22 to 25 of the Enquiry Report under the heading ' Analysis of Evidence ' learned enquiry officer observed as under:-

Analysis of Evidence

" I have carefully perused the evidence (oral as well as documentary) laid before me during the enquiry. The management relied on 7 documents and examined five witnesses . The defence examined one witness and relied upon one document.

The charge levelled against Shri C. Gurumullaiah is "doing acts prejudicial to the interest of the Bank " vide Clause No. 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement .

and the case was taken up for the trial of the said issue in thefirst instance. During the course of trial , the management examined the Enquiry Officer as MW1 and got marked documents at Ex. Ml toM4 . There being no representation onthe part of the first party union or for that matter or by the first party workman, MW1 was discharged and case came to be posted for evidence of the first party on the said issue if any. From 23-11-04 till 24-2-05, case under went several adjournments giving opportunity to the first partyto lead evidence on the said issue and since the frist party failed to do so the matter came to be posted for hearing of the arguments . Then arguments on the said issuewere heard on 14-6-05 in the absence of representative ofthe first party union and the first party workman and this tribunal by its order dated 20-6-05 answered the above said issue recording the finding that Domestic Enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second Party is fair and proper. Then case was posted for argument on merits by 22-6-05 , on which date again there was no representation from the first party and after having heard the learned counsel for the Second party, the case is posted forAward.

The allegations against Shri C. Gurumullaiah is that while working as an Attender at Chamarajanagar branch, hepilfered blank Demand Draft and PayOrder pads from the custody ofthe branch and parted with the same to outsiders who utilized the same and attempted to perpetuate a fraud on the Bank . That he made a voluntary confession statement detailing the circumstances under which the modus operandi adoptedby him to pilfer the blank Demand Draft and Pay Orderpads.

I am of the opinion that answers to the following questions would help me in arrving at a just conclusion:

(1) Whether Demand Draft and Pay Order pads were missing from Chamarajnagar branch ?

4. Now therefore, keeping in view the finding recorded by this tribunal on the above said Preliminary Issue holding that the Domestic Enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second party is fair and proper, the next question to be gone into by this tribunal would have been about the perversity or otherwise of the findings of theEnquiry Officer and quantum of punishment awarded against the first party holding him guilty of the charges of misconduct levelled against him.

(2) Whether Sri Gurumallaiah had access to the DD/Presenting Officer pads kept in the saferoom of Chamarajnagar branch ?

(3) Whether Shri Gurumallaiah has signed the confession staternent ?

(4) Whether the confession statement dated 28-6-95 is a Voluntary Statement ?

5. As noted above, there has been no representation on the part of the first party union and the first party workman and in the result except the averments made in the Claim Statement that findings of the Enquiry Officer sufferedfrom perversity, the court is left with no alternative but to go through the findings of the Enquiry Officer by itself so as to find out the truth in the contentions taken by the first party challenging the enquiry findings as perverse etc.

1. Whether Demand Draft and Pay Order pads were missing from Chamarajnagar branch ?

6. As far as the management is concerned , the learned counsel representing it argued that there has been sufficient and legal documentary as well as oral evidence pressed into service by the management to establish the charges of misconduct levelled against the first party and that finding given by the Enquiry Officer are well supported by valid and cogent reasons based on the above said

The Management has relied upon M. Ex . 2 , 2a to 2i . 3 to 6 to establish about DD pads/Presenting Officer pads missing from the branch and that two of such missing DD leaves were presented at Nagpur branch of the Bank for payment and on oral evidence of MW2 , 4 & 5. In view of the defence not touching upon this point , the management could establish relying upon both the oral and documentary 8995 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

evidence that the DD/Presenting Officer pads referredto in the Charge sheet were found missing from the safe custody of Chamarajnagar branch.

2. Whether Shri Gurumallaiah had access to the DD/ Presenting Officer pads kept in the saferoom of Chamarajnagar branch ?

Shri Gurumallaiah and that it is typed in English . However , the defence states that the said statement is obtained from the CSE under coercion and that it was obtained at a house at Chamarajapuram Railway Station . In support of their stand, the Management has examined MWI and MW3 whose signatures appear in M. Ex. 1. Both MW1 and MW3 stated that the statement , MEx. 1 is given by Shri Gurumallaiah and that they are witnesses to the oral statement and that the oral statement which was in Kannada was translated to English and the same was typed in English and after typing the statement recorded , it was once again read out to Shri Gurumallaiah to make him understand what is typed therein. They confirm that whatever is in the last para of M. Ex. 1 to the effect that the statement is made without coercion and thatoral statement which was in Kannada is translated and typed/recorded inEnglish is true and that Shri Gurumallaiah went on narrating the events as they took place and the same was recorded in English. Here the oral evidence adduced by MW1 corroborates with the evidence given by MW3. Evidence regarding the time, place , persons present in respect ofM. Ex . 1 adduced by MW1 and MW3 tallies . Sufficient reasons have been adduced by the witnesses as to why the statement was not recorded in Kannada . It needs to be mentioned here that both MWI and MW 3 have stated that the oral statement of Shri Gurumallaiah was translated and typed in English and that thetyped version was again read out to Shri Gurumallaiah and made him understand the English words in Kannada . In this regard , MW2 and MW4 have stated that CSE can understand English. This is relevant particularly when the CSE has worked with MW2 andMW4.

It has been established through documentary evidence that the relevant DD /Presenting Officer pads were kept in the saferoom of Chmarajnagar Branch. The Manager, MW2, has categorically stated that Shri Gurumallaiah was not handling the keys of the saferoom. However, during re- examination, she has clarified that the Attenders , including Shri Gurumallaiah had access to the saferoom during office hours till the gate is locked. MW2 further stated that it may not be possible for the joint custodians to always keep an eye on the Attenders who have access to the saferoom . MW4 , one of the joint custodians , has deposed that the grill gate to the saferoom was not closed always due to various office exigencies . further in the cross examination , MW4 clarified that after removing the cash in the morning, the door of the saferoom was just closed, meaning to say that the door was not locked. He also clarified that the gate of the saferoom was kept open for the convenience of the branch to take out pension papers , stationery items which were kept there and were frequently required . In response to the question as to whether accountability has been fixed on joint custodians who were responsible for the safety of the lost DD/Presenting Officer pads ,MW2 stated that the required information was given and she is not aware of any questioning/punishment . MW4, one of the joint custodians, has stated that for the missing of the DD /Presenting Officer pads and for carelessness , the joint custodians including himself have been suitably punished. Thus , it is apparent that the door of the saferoom was not locked always and that it was accessible to attenders during office hours . MW5 has stated that the DD/Presenting Officer pads in question were in current use and that it was kept in a steel box and the box used to be brought to the Counter by a sub -staff/ Attender and that sometimes , the box used to be brought from the saferoom to the counter without the supervisor accompanying the same/attender. It has also come on record that the said steel box used to be kept unlocked. From the evidence , it is evident that the Attenders of the branch including Sri Gurumallaiah had access to the DD pads, though in normal circumstances , it is deviation from the procedure.

3. Whether Shri Gurumallaiah has signed the confession statement ?

Shri Guruallaiah has categorically stated that the confession statement, M. Ex. 1 is signed by him albeitunder coercion/threat .

4. Whether the confession statement dated 28-6-1995 isvoluntary Statement ?

The defence has raised doubts regarding the technical aspects of the statement dated 28-6-95 (M. Ex. 1 ) of the CSE. In my opinion, a statement, whether it is addressed to anybody or not/whether it is made known to any person unknown. It is the statement of the signatory unless it is destroyed or disowned. In the instant case , from the circumstances appearing , the statement of the CSE is intended/ addressed to the Bank because if it were not to be given to the Bank , the defence has not brought any evidence to the contrary. Both the witnesses to the statement (MW1 and MW3 ) have clearly stated that the statement of the CSE was recorded and witnessed by them and the same was duly passed on to the higher authorities , Hence, there cannot be any doubt about the technical validity of M Ex. 1 coming to the analysis of the defence evidence , the CSE has exposed himself as Defence witness. The CSE/DW has deposed that he was slapped and hand cuffed and was taken by bus to Mysore and that he was taken to a house and was locked. Further he has stated that he was given a typed letter, which was in English and was asked to sign it . He has also stated that he neither read the statement signed by him or the contents were explained to him. That he was threatened by two persons and was forced to sign the statement . He has also stated that both MW1 and MW3 are not present at that point of time. I find that Shri Gurumallaiah , in response to the chaergesheet has submitted his explanation vide letter dated 5-6-97 and in the enquiry, he has agreed that the said letter as his own.

There is a divergent view about the confession statementdt . 28-6-95 (Mex . 1 ) . The management states that the statement is voluntary and is given by 8996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

3 (ii) ]

[PART IISEC .

From the analysis made above, it is clear that Shri C. Gurumallaiah pilfered blank DD and Presenting Officer pads from the custody of Charmarajanagar branch and parted with the same to certain outsiders and that pursuant to such act; he gave a confession statement voluntarily on 28-6-95.

8. Therefore,from the reading of the above said discussion and the observations , so to say, the reasoning givenby the Enquiry Officer after analyzing of evidence brought on record before him , it gets crystal clear that there was sufficient documentary as well as oral évidence to speak to the charges of misconduct leveled against the first party. The Enquiry Officer has discussed at length oral testimony as well as the documents produced by the management in reaching his conclusion to hold the first party guilty of the charges . The learned enquiry officer has very much taken into consideration the defence taken by the first party workman contending that the above said confessional letter given by him was obtained from him under coercion and threats . He rejected the above said defence of the first party by giving very cogent and sufficient reasonings as could be seen from the above passage in the enquiry report .

He has also informed that he understood the contents of the said letter dated 5-6-97 . On going through the said letter/ explanation, though he CSE has informed that the statement was obtained under threat/ coercion , now where he has informed that he was taken on the previous day to the statement by force from the branch and that the statement was not obtained at DO , Mysore but at a house at Chamarajapuram Railway Station . This aspect is ofvital importance in the light of clear cut indication in the charge sheet. Wherein it is stated that the confession statement was made atMysore . Even in DEx. 1 , which is a letter dated 29-6-95 , of the CSE to the Manager , requesting for a day's leave on 28-6-95, the CSE has stated only about his visit to the Divisional Office , nowhere has he mentioned about the obtentionofMEx i under threat . The DEx. 1 clearly states that he went to see the Divisional Manager on 28-6-95 in connection with same subject matter pertaining to the Bank and it does not talk about taking him to Mysore by force. It isalso relevant to note that the Branch Manager, i.e. MW2 has not come out with anything about any such incident offorcibly taking away ofthe CSE from the branch. In fact, she has stated that the CSE was not taken into custody from the branch by the CBI Official . In this regard, the defence has not produced any corroborative evidence in support of CSE's evidence . Regarding the ill treatment meted to him at the basement of the branch or taking him away to Mysore during office hours , the defence has not produced any corroborative evidence . MW2 , the Manager has answered in the cross examination that the presence of the CSE at DO was informed to her subsequently.

I observe that the statement in question, i.e. M Ex. 1 is dated 28-6-95 and the Charge sheet was received by the CSE on 6-5-97, i.e. after considerable time gap .

9. Now it is well settled principle of law that enquiry findings can be said to be perverse in case the conclusion drawnby the Enquiry Officer holding the workman guilty ofthe misconduct was not based on evidence or was based on' insufficient evidence ' . The case on hand is neither the case of ' no evidence ' or the case of ' insufficient evidence ' . In the result it is very difficult to appreciate the contention taken by the first party workman that enquiry findings suffered from perversity so as to be interferedby the hands of this tribunal resulting into setting aside the dismissal order passed against him.

10. With regard to the quantum of punishment, again there is no force in the contention of the first party that the dismissal order passed against him was not proportionate to the gravity of the misconduct committed by him. The fact that he served the bank for a period of25 years without inviting any black mark in his service cannot be a factor to be given any weight in imposing the punishment of dismissal against the workman . While passing the punishment order one has to see the misconduct committed by the workman and if it is of a grave nature, then , past record of the workman will not help him in any way particularly in the cases like one on hand when the gravity ofmisconduct is apparent . In the result, it cannot be said that punishment of dismissal was in any way not commensurate or disproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct committed by the workman. Therefore , punishment order is to be upheld and reference is to be rejcted accordingly. Hence the following Award:-

AWARD

The reference is dismissed . No. order to cost ,

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 30th June, 2005)

TheCSE/DWduring the cross examination, has stated that he did not inform the authorities about under what circumstances i.e under threat , the confession letter dated 28-6-95 was given . The CSE/DW has informed that since he was assured that no dire consequences would happen , he did not inform his higher authorities/given any cimplaint . The above reason adduced by the CSE/DW is not satisfactory particularly when the Bank has suspended him from service on 5-9-95 for his alleged act of pilfering DD/Presenting. Officer pads . It is also relevant to note that theCSE is suspended from the service within 3 months of the statement (M Ex. 1 ) . Thus , from the above , it can be concluded that the CSE did not mention anything about theill treatment , taking him by force to Mysore etc. to his higher authorities till during the enquiry. DEX. 1 which the CSE/DW has submitted to the branch does not talk anything about this . Hedid not inform his higher authorities anything about intention ofM. Ex . I by threat, etc. till he was issued with charge sheet though in the meantime, he was suspended from the service. Even the letter dated 5-6-97 does not corroborate the oral evidence ofthe CSE. All the above aspects go to show that the oral evidence of the CSE is an after thought and that the confession statement dated 28-6-95 (MEx . 1 ) is a voluntary statement .

A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer 8997 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2768.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 47/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/73/2003- आई आर( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7 July, 2005

2. As could be seen from the records (Order sheet maintained by this Tribunal ) thrice notices of appearance onthe above said reference point were issued to the first party by RPAD but on all those three occasions notice have returnedunserved with a report that " addressee (First Party) has not been served on account of his absence at the address given and that his whereabouts are not known" . Therefore , there being no point in once again issuing notices of appearance to the first party, the matter cameto be posted for filing of the Claim Statement of the first party giving once more opportunity to the first party but he did not turn up nor he filed his Claim Statement. Therefore, the case was posted for filing Counter Satement if any, by the Second Party Management .

3. The Management which made appearance through counsel filed its Counter Statement. The various contentions taken by the management in its Counter Statement are as under :-

S.O. 2768. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 47/2003) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , received by the Central Government on 7-7-2005 .

[No. L - 12012/73/2003 - IR (B- II) ]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

Para 1 : that no Claim Petition has been received from the first party workman nor the First partyworkman has filed any Claim Petition before this Hon'ble Tribunal to the best of itsknowledge.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, "SHRAM SADAN "

III MAIN, III CROSS , II PHASE , TUMKUR ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR, BANGALORE-560022.

Dated: 29th June , 2005

Present :

Shri A. R. Siddiqui, Presiding Officer

C. R. No. 47/2003

IIParty

IParty

The Asstt. General

Manager, Syndicate Bank ,

Zonal Office ,

IRC, Gandhinagar, Bangalore-560009

Para 2 -that the first party workman was chargesheeted on a number of occasions and adminstered punishments for commission of various minor and major / gross miconducts from time to time in terms of the relevant provisions of Bipartite Settlement under which his service conditions are governed. It is pertinent to mention that he was issued with a total of 11 chargesheets and adminstered punishments earlier to the impugned charge-sheet vide No. CGS (W) /BNG / 99 / 21 dated 9-3-1999 which culminated in his compulsory retirement from the services . The details of such chargesheets and punishments adminstered are furnished in Annexure - A. It is therefore on record that the service record maintained by the first party workman was a soiled one .

Shri H.R. Nagaraja Murthy, Thulagama Compound, Behind St. Marys Kannada, Convent , Church Colony, Arsikere Town, Arsikere , HassanDistrict - 573 103 Karnataka .

Para 3 -that the impugned charge sheet vide AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide Order No. L - 12012/ 73 / 2003 / IR (B - II) dated 31st July, 2003 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

No. CGS (W) /BNG/ 99 / 21 dated 9-3-1999 itself bears the reference of earlier three chargesheets issued to him for similar misconducts i.e. Commission of miconduct ofirregular attendance and unauthorised absence . This speaks that there is nothing surprise or new in the service ofimpugned chargesheet to the first party workman when he was already in the habit of being a regular recipient of chargesheets .

"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank on compulsorily retiring Shri H.R. Nagaraja Murthy, Ex- Clerk from Services w.e.f. 18-1-2000 is legal and justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

Para 4 -that the first party workman being a workman is governed by various awards 2211GI /2005-37 8998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii) ] and Bipartite Settlement . The Fact remains that he is a habitual absentee . The Impugned charge sheet was delivered to him on 7-4-1999 . As he did not submit any teply. After waiting for more than 50 days the Disciplinary Authority has rightly proceeded in the matter by ordering for a departmental enquiry vide his letter No. 1267/CGS (W)/99/21 dated 29-5-1999 by appointing the enquiry officer .

Para 5:

assistance of an advocate for his defence the copy of the said letter is enclosed as Annexure -C which was duly replied by the Disciplinary Authority vide his letter No. 2460/CGH (W)/99/21 dated 28-8-99 . clearly informing the first party workman that his request for an Advocate cannot be considered as the charge pertains to unauthorized absent which does not involve any legal issue , interalia, advising him to attend the enquiry scheduled for 6-9-1999 . A copy of the letter is enclosed as Annexure -D which was recieved by the first party workman on 4-9-99.

Para 6 : that the first party workman was charged for unauthorized absence he was an habitual absentee . His frequent and intermittent absence had put the Branch administration out of gear and the day to dayfunctioning of the branch and customer service was affected. The first party workman was working at the Kolagunda Branch of the Second Party bank which is a rural branch and being a rural branch such unauthorized absence creates lot of problems , that too when such absence runs on an ongoing basis .

Para 7: the very fact that the Enquiry officer has time and again informed the first party workman absout the proceedings and has sent the copy of the enquiry proceedings and documents etc. immediately after the completion ofproceedings on 25-8-99 i.c. the first day of enquiry, on that day itself, is indicative that the first party workman is aware of the documents on which the management has relied upon to prove the charge against him as enumerated in the impugned chargesheet and related proceedings.

Para 8: that inspite ofEnquiry Officer's intimation/ notice/letter of him informing that he is entitled to engage the Defence Represen- tative in terms Clause 19.12( a) of the Bipartite Settlement, he has not engaged any Defence Representative nor there was any letter/ representation/ communication to the effect other than a letter i.e. Annexure-C requesting to engage the lawyer. This too was immediately replied by the Disciplinary Authority with valid reasons in Annexure-D.

that the Enquiry Officer issued letter / notice to the first party workman on 29-7-1999 Intimating that he would be holding the enquiry at Zonal Office , Bangalore on 25-8-1999 and that he is entitled to engage ofDefence representative in terms a Clause 19.12(a) of the Bipartite Settlement . A Copy of the enquiry notice is enclosed as Annexure -B which was duly acknowledged by the first party workman. He on 18-8-1999 submitted a letter informed that he was suffering from illness since 26-7-1999 and Doctors have advised him for rest . The subject letter was not supported by any Medical Certificate nor any supportive information /document thereto. In view of the same , as there was ho supportive information/document, the enquiry officer immediately on receipt of his letter sent a telegram duly followed by a letter advising the first party workman to attend the enquiry at Zonal Office , Bangalore on 25-8-99 As there was no reply, nor any communication from the first party workman , the enquiry Officer as scheduled on 25-8-1999 , held the enquiry and conducted the same in strict adherence to the principles of naturaljustice by following scrupulously the principles and procedures of departmental enquiry. The very fact that enquiry officer has allowed him sufficient time gap. is indicative that he has tried his level best to accommodatethe first party workman . The Fact remains that the enquiry was adjourned n 25-8-1999 by giving the first party workman ample opportunities to put forth his defence, the enquiry proceedings was again held on 6-9-1999 and subsequently on 18-9-1999. After completion ofeach and every session of the enquiry, the enquiry officer has diligently sent a copy of the enquiry proceedings to the first party workman. The Second Party Management also wish to come on record that the first party workman has requested the

Para 9 :-that in departmental enquiry the assistance of advocate is not a mandatory provision . The charge, is that of unauthorized absence which is frequent and intermittent in nature.

management to permit him to have the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

8999

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

This charge does not involve any legal angle orlegal complexities . This was made clear to the first party workman time and again .

Para 10

:-that though considerable time was given, the first party workman did not submit any reply to the charge sheet . Leave is not a matter of right and such frequent absence that too at regular intervals caanot be condoned by any services industry like Second Party Bank.

Para 11

not fair and proper, it may be permitted to lead further evidence and fresh evidence to prove the charges before this Hon'ble tribunal against the first party, to meet the ends of justice . Therefore , for the aforementioned reasons , it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleaded to reject the Claim Statement of the first party and pass an award in favour of the Second Party, which would meet the ends ofjustice and equity.

4. Keeping inview the various contentions taken bythemanagement with regard to the validity and fairness or otherwise of the enquiry proceedings , this court thought it proper to frame a Preliminary issue and accordingly a Preliminary issue as under was framed as under :

"Whether the Domestic Enquiry conducted against the fisrt party by the Second Party is Fair and Proper?"

5. Thereupon the management was called upon to lead evidence on the above said issue . The managment filed an affidavit of enquiry officer as MW1 and got marked in all 18 documents at Ex. Ml to M18 . Since the first party remained exparte, there was no cross examination ofMW1. After hearing the learned counsel for the Second Party Management on the above said issue , it was answered in the affirmative holding that the enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second Party is fair and proper . On 17th June 2005 when the matter was taken up to pronounce the order on the above said issue and order was pronounced in the open court , the learned counsel for the Second Party also remained absent therefore , matter was taken as heard and posted for award .

:-that the first party workman inspite of due notices , absented himself from the enquiry, the Enquiry Officer was compelled to hold the enquiry by placing the first party workman exparte. When the first party workman avoided to attend the enquiry, there was no alternative for the Enquiry Officer then to place him exparte and proceed with the enquiry. This is a settled position. In the circumstances , it is but natural that when the enquiry is held exparte, to have a clear picture of the issue involved and get at the bottom of the truth , the Enquiry Officer can put questions of clarificatory nature . These questions are put only to know the procedural aspect of governance/ administration and/or rules/ procedures followed in the event of unauthorised absence . A copy of the Enquiry Officer's Report is enclosed as Annexure - E . The Enquiry Officer has conducted the enquiry in strict adherence to the principles of Natural Justice and has followed scrupulously the rules and procedures of departmental enquiry.

Para 12

: that the first party workman was repeatedly chargesheeted for unauthorized absence on number of occasions . He was also charge sheeted for commission of gross misconducts bordering on financial indiscipline and so on. Total charge sheets so issued to him are 12 in number including one under question . The fact remains that the Appellate Authority in the appeal has viewed the matter leniently and reduced the punishment of dismissal to that of CompulsoryRetirement . This punishment is rather lenient and just and proper . The punishment is proportionate to the gravity and scriousness of misconduct .

Para 13: that there is no Claim Petition preferred by

6. In the light of the findings recorded by this tribunal on the above said Preliminary Issue to the effect that the enquiry conducted by the second party against the first party is fair and proper the only next point to be takeninto consideration would be as to whether the findings. ofthe enquiry officer holding the first party workman guilty ofthe charges of misconduct suffered from any perversity or not and as to whether the impugned punishment of Compulsory Retirement imposed by the management is proportionate and in commensurate to the gravity of misconduct committed by the first party. As seen above , the first party workman not only remained ausent before the Enquiry Officer resulting into exparte enquiry proceedings but also remained absent before this tribunal as his presence would not be secured by this tribunal despite issuing notice to him on 3 occasions by registered post. Therefore, as the things stand, on the part of the first party, the findings of the enquiry have gone unchallenged and uncontroverted. However, in order to decide the point in controversy, this tribunal felt it necessary to go into the very report of the Enquiry Officer . Under the heading "Analysis of Evidence " on page 5 and 6 of the Enquiry Report run as under :-

Analysis of Evidence.

the first party workman, the Second Party is not in aposition to rebute the Claim Para- wise. Since all the connected papers have been submitted herewith , the same may pleasebe perused and this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to reject the Reference and pass an Award upholding the decision of the Second Party Bank.

"The charge sheet framed against the employee is habitual doing of an act which amounts to minor misconducts of absence without leave and Para 14: - that if this Hon'ble Tribunal comes to the conclusion on any ground that enquiry is 9000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

Taking into consideration the oral and documentary evidence produced before me by the Managment and the CSE not coming forward to lead any evidence in defence . I am concinced that the CSE has absented unauthorisedly in violation of leave rules and his absence has affected the smooth functioning of the branch and also customer service in that rural branch."

irregular attendence vide Clause No. 19.5 (f) of the Bipartite Settlement . The charge sheet also specified the various periods of unauthorized absence of the CSE from 2-2-98 to 17-12-98 totaling to 162 days. Since the CSE was charge sheeted thrice in the past as mentioned in the Charge sheet, on4th occasion his irregular attendence to office was treated asGross Misconduct and accordingly the matter was brought under Clause 19.5 (f) of the Bipartite Settlement . MR. has also produced photocopies of the charge sheets issued to the CSE in the past as well as the proceedings of the disciplinary Authority awarding punishments . Therefore , in the instant case , the action of the employee absenting unauthorisedly and also his irregular attendence have been rightly brought under Clause No. 19.5 (f) ofthe Bipartite Settlement asa Gross Misconduct .

The employees absence for 162 days was treated asunauthorized by RO Mysore and the same was communicated to the CSE vide the letters mentioned in the charge sheet . The copies ofRO Mysore letters were produced by the MR in the enquiry. From the said letters of RO Mysore issued to the CSE, I observe that the various periods of his absence was treated as unauthorized with consequent out in wages, break in service and postponement of annuel increment date for the following reasons :-

(1) Remainiang a sent without proper sanction of leave by the competent authority,

(ii) Irregular attendance,

(iii ) Violation of leaves rules .

7. Therefore from the perusal of the above said passage from the Enquiry Report submitted by the Enquiry Officer, it canbe seen that the learned Enquiry Officer has not only taken into consideration the oral testimony of 2 witnesses examined before him as MW1 and MW2 but also has considered the documentary evidence produced before himby the management representative during the course of enquiry held against the first party in his absence . After analysing the evidence , therefore , the Enquiry Officer in my opinion rightly came to the conclusion that the charge of misconduct of habitual absence from duty against the first party workman has been proved by sufficient and legal evidence. It is based on the above said enquiry report Ex . M13 markedbefore this tribunal , the Disciplinary Authority by its order dated 18-1-2000 marked at Ex.M15 imposed the punishment of dismissal against the workman. It is seen from the records that against the above said punishment order the first party workman prepared an appeal and the Applellate Authority by its order dated 8-6-2000 disallowed the appeal partly by modifying the punishment of dismissal into the punishment of Compulsory Retirement . A perusal of the impugned punishment order by the Disciplinary Authority and the above said order passed bytheAppellate Authority again go to establish the various contentions taken by the management in their Counter Statement referred to supra. The reasonings assigned by the Disciplinary Authority as well as by the Appellate Authority are again quite valid and cogent not to be interfered at the hand of this tribunal . Therefore , going through the enquiry report and the aforesaid punishment orders by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority, I am having absolutely no hesitation in my mind to come to the conclusion that charges of misconduct leveled against the first party workman have been proved by sufficient, legal and satisfactory evidence.

It was also informed to the CSE that the said UAA period would ut count as service for terminal/pensior.efits . The charges are further strengthend by the documents produced by the MR. Hence , I am fully convinced to say that the CSE absented without intimation and sanctioned of leave for 162 days during the period mentioned in the charge sheet . From the deposition of witnesses MWI and MW-2, it is observed that the CSE has already availed Sick Leave to the maximum eligibility of 540days . The total EOL on LOP availed is 412 days and UAA of 839 days . Kolgunda being small potential branch , such absence by violating leave rules has caused inconvenience to the branch in its smooth functioning and effected customers service .

8. Now coming to the point of quantom of punishment , here again , there appears to be no injustice as such done to the first party. The Appellate Authority has already taken a lenient view and modified the punishment of dismissal into the punishment of Compulsory Retirement . Therefore, keeping in view the gravity of the misconduct committed by the first party, punishment of Compulsory Retirement does not seem to be disproportionate or not in commensurate to the gravity of the misconduct committed bythe first party. In the result the following award is passed.

AWARD

The reference is dismissed. No order to cost.

(Dictated to PA transciribed by her corrected and signedby me on 29th June , 2005. )

The employee has not even replied to the charge sheet inspite of granting ample time . During the enquiry also he has not participated tocross examine the management witnesses and to lead his evidence in defence inspite of providing opportunities by adjourning the enquiry at each stage. He did not even make his submissions till today i.e. 25-10-99 , on enquiry proceedings inspite of giving time upto 30-9-99.

A.R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer 9001

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2769.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 केअनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मार्मागाव पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 60/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-36011/3/98- आई आर ( एम ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 7th July, 2005

S.O. 2769. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 60/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Mumbai - 1 now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Mormugao Port Trust and their workman , received by the Central Government on 7-7-2005.

[No. L-36011/3/98 - IR (M) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 AT MUMBAI PRESENT:

Shri Justice Hrishikesh Banerji , PresidingOfficer

Reference No. CGIT- 60 of 2003 Employers in relation to the Management of Mormugao Port Trust And Their workmen

Appearances:

Forthe Mangement : Shri M.B. Anchan , Advocate Forthe Union :Shri Jaiprakash Sawant , Advocate

:Goa

State

Mumbai , dated this the 22nd day of June, 2005 AWARD

This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Clause (d) of Sub- section (1) and Sub-section ( 2A) of Section 10. of the Industrial Disputes Act (the Act for short ). The terms of reference areas follows :

"Whether the action of the Management of Mormugao Port Trust in proposing change in shift pattern from 12 hours (which includes 3 hours fixed overtime with one hour recess ) to 8 hours shift in respect of Watch and Ward Staff of General AdministrationDepartment by way of issuing Notice ofchange under Section 9 -A of the I.D. Act, 1947 is legal andjustified ? If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to ?"

Boththe parties jointly filed a settlement and prayed that the matter may be disposed of. The terms of settlement are as follows:

" 1. The Management and the employees through the recognized union i.e. MP and RWU and GP & DEU have agreed to revert/post the fire brigade staff on 12hrs . shift pattern for a period of6 months w.e.f. 12-04-04 . All the fire brigade staff will be posted on rotation basis so as to give the benefit of O. T. to all the staffuniformly. Total 13 fire brigade personnel willl be posted in each shift.

2. The staffwhen posted on 12 hrs . shift duty shall be paid 3 hrs . of fixed overtime for each day of work. The staff will not claim any O.T. payment for the recess hours for ineals and will maintain full turn at all times to meet any emergency.

3. No variable overtime will be payable under any circumstances except for those who are working on port holidays in shifts to maintain minimum complement or unless specifically approved by the Competent Authority.

4. The union will withdraw all the matters connected withthe fire brigade which are pending before LC, Labour Ministry, Industial Tribunals and High Court, having the consent settlement .

5. Both the parties have agreed to send the compliance report of the terms of settlement to the ALC (C ) / RLC/ CLC , Labour Ministry, Presiding Officer /CGIT No. 1. This Agreement will remain valid for a period ofsix months w.e.f. 12-4-2004. "

Since the parties have already settled the matter, it is disposed of by stating that there is no industrial dispute between the parties for passing an Award .

HRISHIKESH BANERJI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 7 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2770.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 4/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12011/175/2003- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th July, 2005

S.O. 2770.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 4/2004) of 9002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II SEC.3 (ii) ]

निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, मुम्बई 1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 23/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Mumbai - 1 now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of India and their workman, received by the Central Government on 7-7-2005.

[सं. एल-11012/91/98- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 8th July, 2005

[No. L- 12011 / 175/2003 -IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 AT MUMBAI

PRESENT:

S.O. 2771. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 23/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Mumbai - 1 now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Modiluft Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-7-2005.

Shri Justice Hrishikesh Banerji , PresidingOfficer

Reference No. CGIT-4 of 2004

[No. L- 11012/91/98 - IR( C-I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

Employers in relation to the Management of Bank of India And Theirworkmen

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 AT MUMBAI PRESENT:

Appearances:

Shri Justice Hrishikesh Banerji, PresidingOfficer

For the Management: Shri Saptarshi Ghosh

Reference No. CGIT -23 of 1999

Forthe Union : Shri V. M. Tendulkar, President

Mumbai , dated this the 22nd day of June , 2005

AWARD

Employers in relation to the Management of Modiluft Ltd. And Theirworkmen

Appearances:

This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Clause ( d ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act ( the Actfor short). The terms of reference are as follows :

Forthe Mangement : S/Shri Shamrao Patil and A.S. Patil , Advocate

For theUnion State : Shri Jaiprakash Sawant , Advocate : Maharashtra

Mumbai , dated this the 22nd day of June , 2005 AWARD

"Whether the action of the Management ofBank of India, Mumbai South Zone , Mumbai in violating the agreement arrived at in between the Bank of India Management and Federation of Bank of India Staff Unions on selection to the post of Cashier Category E' and ' C' is justified ? If not , what relief the union viz . Bank of India Karmachari Sena is entitled to ?"

This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Clause ( d ) of Sub- section ( 1) and Sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act ( the Act for short) . The terms of reference areas follows :

TheBank of India Karmachari Sena submits that their grievances as reflected in the order of reference no longer exist and hence they are not interested in prosecuting the reference . It is therefore held that the reference stands disposed of as withdrawn.

क्यामोदीलुफ्त लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र द्वारा सूची में दिए गए कर्मकारों कोकाम से रोकना तथा उनके वेतन का भुगतान न करना विधिवत् न्यायसंगत व उचित है ? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस राहत के पात्रहैं ?

The reference is therefore disposed of.

Both the partiesjointly filed a settlement and prayed thatthe matter maybe disposed of.

HRISHIKESH BANERJI, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली , 8 जुलाई , 2005

Since the parties have already settled the matter, it is disposed of by stating that there is no Industiral Dispute between the parties for passing an Award .

का. आ. 2771.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मोदीलुफ्त लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में

HRISHIKESH BANERJI , Presiding Officer 9003

भारत का रांजपत्र: अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई, 2005

justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

का. आ. 2772.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/453/2000- आई आर( सी- I ) ] एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2005

S.O. 2772.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 48/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-7-2005.

[No. L -20012/453/2000- IR (C- I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. Biswas, Presiding Officer

2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared . Management, however, made appearance through their authorised representative . Ittranspires from the record that initially instant reference casewas disposed of on the basis of 'No dispute ' award. After passing that 'No dispute' award the sponsoring union filedapetition for recalling the said award and accordingly amisc. case was registered vide Misc. Case No. 4/2004 . The misc. case was disposed of vide order No. 4 dated 19-10-2004 in favour of the sponsoring union and the original reférence case was restored to its original file and Number. Thereafter the sponsoring union/workman was directed to submit written Statement on 11-1-2005 . On that date neither the concerned workman nor his representative was found present and accordingly the case was adjourned for filing Written Statement on 24-3-2005 though both sides were present , but no written Statement was filed on behalf ofthe workman/union and accordingly date was fixed on 6-5-2005 for filing Written Statement by the workman.But on 6-5-2005 neither the concerned workman nor his representative was found present . Attitude of the sponsoring union shows clearly that their intention is only to drag on the case for the reason best known to them. This is a case of2001. It is seen that within the period four years the sponsoring union did not consider necessary to submit written Statement. As such at this stage , I do not find any sufficient ground to adjourn the case suo moto for filingWritten Statement by the workman . Hence workman's case is closed and accordingly a ' No dispute ' Award is passed in this reference presuming non-existence ofany industrial dispute between the parties .

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section10( 1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer Reference No. 48 of 2001

नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई, 2005

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workman

APPEARANCES :

: None

: Mr. U. N. Lal,

On the bahalf of the workman On behalf of the employers

Advocate.

का. आ. 2773.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टिस्को के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम मंत्रालय, धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 67/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । State : Jharkhand

:Industry: Coal

Dated, Dhanbad , the 26th June , 2005

[सं. एल-20012/186/98- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव AWARD

New Delhi , the 8 July, 2005

TheGovt. of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L-20012/453/ 2000 (C-I), dated, the 19th February, 2001.

SCHEDULE

S.O. 2773. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.67/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Tisco and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 6-7-2005.

[No. L-20012/186/98 - IR ( C -I)] S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

"Whether the action of the management ofM/s . BCCL in reverting back the workman Sri Kalipada Mahato, Bastacola Area from the post ofClerk (T) to General Mazdoor by nulifying the selection and posting order dated 15-5-92 is 9004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT :

Shri B. Biswas , PresidingOfficer.

Inthe matter ofan Industrial Dispute under Section10( 1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947

naturaljustice. After issuance of the said order of dismissal he submitted representation to the management with prayer for his reinstatement in service recalling the said order of dismissalbut that yielded no effect and for which he raised an industrial dispute before the ALC ( C) for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . The concerned workman accordingly submitted prayer to pass Award directing the management to reinstate him in service setting aside the order of dismissal from the date when it was issued .

Reference No. 67 of 1999

3. Management on the contrary after filing written PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Tisco and their workman

APPEARANCES :

Onbahalf of the workman : Mr. D. Mukherjee, Advocate.

Onbehalfof the employers Mr. D.K. Verma, Advocate.

State: Jharkhand

Industry:Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 20th June, 2005

AWARD

TheGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L- 20012/186/ 98- IR( C- I ) , dated, 27-1-1999.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management ofBhelatand Colliery of M/ s . TISCO in dismissing Sh . Dharam Singh , Chainman , P. No. 214574 of Project Section, Bhelatand under Clause 19 ( 5 ) of the Certified Standing Order of the company vide dismissal Order No. PROJ /AB/2090 dated 26th October, 1994 w.e.f. 1-11-1994 is justified? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

2. Caseofthe concerned workman according to written Statement submitted by him in brief is as follows:-

Statement-cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegation which the concerned workman asserted in his Written Statement . They submitted that during ' C ' shift duty on 18-6-94 at about 1.30 A.M. of 19-6-94 , the concerned workman came to Sijua Colliery and after meeting Mr. R.C. Singh Asstt . Colliery Manager of that colliery who at that relevant time was found standing on the surface at 15 Pit Top, threatened him to kill taking a Revolver in his hand . He also made querry to him why he was not granting leave to the employees .However , said R. C. Singh, Asstt . Colliery Manager somehow got his escape from him and came to the Security Department and informed the matter to them . When the officials of the Security Department reached the spot the concerned workman fled away from the place of occurance . As the offence committed by the concerned workman amounted to serious misconduct as per clause 19 (5) of the Certified Standing Order of the Company, a chargesheet was issued to him on 22-6-94 and he was also placed under suspension . After receipt of the said chargesheet the concerned workman submitted his reply on 4-7-94 denying all the charges brought against him. In reply as alibi he disclosed that on 18-6-94 from 8.30 A.M. to 1.00 P.M. he was on duty and as he got loose motion and pain in his abdomen for which he went to the Nursing. Home ofDr. M.P. Saha , Chatabad Malkera Dhanbad and got his admission there and released on 19-6-1994 at 7.00 P.M. He submitted that as he was under treatment at the time of incident it was impossible on his part to commit such misconduct as alleged in the chargsheet . As the reply given by the concerned workman was not satisfactory the Disciplinary Authority appointed Mr. M.M. Haque , Dy: Manager (Personnel ) Sijua Colliery as Enquriy Officer to conductdepartmental enquiry against him. Shri R. C. Singh , Asstt . Colliery Manager, Sijua Colliery was appointed as Management's representative to put his case before the EnquiryOfficer on behalf of the management. It has been submitted by the management that in course of hearing of the enquiry proceeding full opportunity was given to the concerned workman not only to cross - examine the Management witnesses but also to defend his own case . They submitted that the Enquiry Officer conducted the saiddepartmental enquiry fairly, properly and in accordance with the principle of natural justice . After completion of the said enquiry, the Enquiry officer submitted his report holding the concerned workman guilty to the charges . The Disciplinary Authority thereafter considering the enquiry proceeding, enquiry report and all other relevant papers came to the conclusion that finding of the enquiry officer was proper and accordingly the Disciplinary Authority dismissed him from his service with effect from 1-11-1994 The concerned workman submitted that he was employed under the Group Survey Officer, Sijua Group . SurveyOffice situated at Bhelatand Colliery under whole and sole control of the Manager, Survey, Sijua Group of Collieries , consisted of Malkera Colliery, Sijua Colliery and Bhelatand Colliery. He submitted that over alleged cause ofaction a chargesheet was issued to him under signature ofthe Officer who is not the competent to issue chargesheet vide No. DGM/A- 3/ 1239 dt . 22-6-94 . He submitted reply to the said chargesheet denying all the charges brought against him but as the Disciplinary Authority was not satisfied with the reply given, decided to holddomestic enquiry against him . He alleged further that the Enquiry Officer who was appointed to hold domestic enquiry did not give sufficient opportunity to defend his case. On the contraryafter completing the enquiry proceeding arbitrarily submitted his report holding him guilty to the charges. The Disciplinary Authority thereafter issued the order of dismissal without considering all pros and cons . Accordingly, he submitted that the said order of dismissal issued against him by the Disciplinary Authority was not only illegal and arbitrary but also it violated the principle of 9005 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Standing Order any employee may be suspended , fined or dismissed without notice or any compensation in lieu of notice if he is found guilty of the misconduct for drunkenness , fighting , riotous or disorderly or indecent behaviour.

by order dt . 26-10-1994 . They further submitted that neither they committed any illegality nor took any arbitrary decision indismissing the concerned workman from service and for which he is not entitled to get any relief in view of his prayer. Accordingly management submitted prayer to pass Award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman.

1. Points to be decided

"Whether the action of the management of Bhelatand Colliery of M/ s . TISCO . in dismissing Sh . Dharam Singh, Chairman, P. No. 214574 of Project Section , Bhelatand under clause 19 (5 ) of the certified standing order of the company vide dismissal order No. PROJ /AB/2090 dt . 26th October, 1994 w.e.f. 1-11-1994 is justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

5. Finding with Reasons

Ittransprires from the record that before taking up hearing ofthis case on merit it was taken into consideration whether domestic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair, proper and in accordance with principle ofnaturaljustice. It is seen that the said issue on preliminary pointwas disposed of in favour of the management vide Order No. 24 dt . 15-6-2004. Now the point for consideration is whether management have been able to substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman and if so whether the concerned workman is entitled to get any relief inview ofprovision of U/ s . 11A of the I. D. Act. , 1947. In course of hearing the chargesheet which was issued to the concerned workman was marked as Ext . M- 1 . The chargesheet speaks as follows :-

"It has been reported that on 18-6-1994 at about 1.30 A.M. in ' C ' shift ( early hours of 19-6-1994) , you went to Sijua Colliery 15 Pit Top with a revolver in your hand and threatened Shri R. C. Singh, Asstt .Manager , Sijua Colliery to kill him. You also asked as to why he was not granting leave to the employees. Sri R. C. Singh somehow managed to escape. He immediately informed the Security Department. Before the Security Personnel could reach the colliery premises, you had fled vay.

The above act on your part amounts to not only threatening a superior officer but also to serious disorderly behaviour.

You are hereby suspended pending enquiry with immediate effect . During the period of your suspension , you will be paid subsistence allowance as per statutory provisions .

You are allowed 72 hours from the date of receipt here of to give your explanation . Any representation that you may make in this connection will be taken into consideration beforepassing orders.

Sd/-Illegible

A.G. M. (Projects)

Jamadoba 22-6-94 "

It is the specific allegation of the management that on 19-6-1994 at about 1.30 A.M. at night the concerned workman i.e. the delinquent came to Sijua Colliery and on seeing Shri R. C. Singh , Asstt . Colliery Manager of that colliery who was at that relevant time standing on the surface at 15 Pit Top came to him and taking a revolver in his hand threatened him to kill . At the time of threatening he also asked Mr. R. C. Singh why he was not granting leave to the employees . Said Shri R. C. Singh, however, was able to get his escape from the spot and thereafter he rushedto the Security Department and informehe incident in question to the Security Department. On receiving the said news when the Security personnel came to the spot they, however, did not find the concerned workman there. It is seen that over the said incident nó FIR was lodged against the concerned workman at local Police Station. Considering record I have failed to find out any complaint lodgedby the complainant Mr. R. C. Singh over the incident in question . Ld . Advocate for the management has failed to satisfy this Tribunal in course of hearing if any written complaint was submitted by the complainant Mr. R. C. Singh to the management over the incident in question. Therefore, it is seen that without lodging any FIR and also in absence ofanywritten complaint Disciplinary Authority issued a chargesheet against the concerned workman. The charge- sheetmarked as Ext . M- 1 also does not speak if any written complaint was lodged by the complainant or not ? Against that chargesheet concerned workman submitted his reply which during hearing was marked as Ext . M-2 . In reply, the concerned workman denied all the charges brought against him and as ali bi took the plea that at the time ofrelevant incident he was not at all present at the spot on the ground thatat that time he was admitted in the Nursing home ofDr. M. P. Saha at Saha Nursing Home , Chatabad Malkera , Dhanbad. As the reply of the chargesheet given by the concerned workman was not satisfactory the Disciplinary Authority appointed Mr. M. M. Haque , Dy. Manager (Personnel) as Enquiry Officer. During hearing of the enquiry proceeding Enquiry Officer examined Mr. R. C. Singh, Mr. N. K. Gupta, Asstt . Manager and Ajay Kumar. From the statement of R. C. Singh it transpires that on 19-6-1994 at about 1.30 A.M. while he was on 15 Pit Top theconcerned workman i.e. Dharam Singh an employee of Project Bhelatand came to him with a revolver in his right hand and thereafter putting the revolver on his chest asked him why he was not granting leave . When Shri Singh resisted he saw another person standing about 20 feet away who was covered with a shawl . On moving further ahead he found another person standing at 11 Pit . Thereafter he came to the Security Office and informed Mr. Ajay Kumar , Security Officer about the incident in question . This witness submitted that at the time of the incident in question N,. K. Gupta and Durga Mahato were present on the spot and they witnessed the incident in question. No evidence is forthcoming whether the leave application of the concerned workman was with the The chargesheet was issued for committing misconduct by the concerned workman as per clause 19 (5) ofthe Certified Standing Order applicable to the workers of the Company. According to Section 19 (5 ) of the Certified

2211GI / 2005--38 9006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] i

ofwhose leave the concerned workman intended to create pressure on him. If the evidence of N. K. Gupta is taken into consideration it will expose clearly that the concerned workman was in drunken state at the relevant time but I do not find its corroboration from the statement of R. C. Singh. It is further seen that the concerned workman i.e. the delinquent had a good relationship with N. K. Gupta and had that not been so he would not request him for having meal with him at his house . Not only Mr. N. K. Gupta , Durga Mahato were present at the spot but also many other miners and trammers were present . It is curious to note that management did not consider necessary to examine either Durga Mahato or other trammers and miners/loaders who were present at the spot. It is also very curious to note that R. C. Singh reported the incident in question to the management on the basis ofwhich chargesheet was issued against the concerned workman . Therefore , the role of R. C. Singh carinot be considered as independent . Knowing fully well of the fact management engaged this R. C. Singh as Presenting Officer to present the case on behalf of the management . I have carefully considered all the statement of witnesses , and after careful consideration ofall the material evidence on record I find no hesitation to draw conclusion that the statement of one witness varies from the statement of other witness in a very ugly manner . Considering statement of all the witnesses there is sufficient reason to believe that R. C. Singh was not in good relation with the concerned workman and for which this way or thatway his intention was to take revenge against him . No satisfactory explanation is forthcoming on the part of the management why R. C. Singh did not submit any written complaint . Why no FIR was lodged against the concerned workman particularly when there was allegation that at the relevant time of the alleged incident he was armed with deadly weapon . If FIR was lodged there was chance of recovery of alleged revolver from the possession of the concerned workman . I have failed to understand how without written complaint just on the basis ofverbal report management issued chargesheet against the concerned workman which is absolutely illegal as because of the fact that the concerned workman was deprived of consulting the complaint made against him . Biasness of the management appears to be very much avident considering the fact that R. C. Singh was an Officer of the management . It is true that in reply to the chargesheet the concerned workman took an alibi in support of his plea of innocence. Onus on him to establish the alibi . However, question of establishing the defence comes in only when the charge brought against him is established beyond all reasonable doubt . Onus absolutely rests on the management to establish the charge against the concerned workman/ delinquent. It is seen that with a view to establish the charge management have been able to examine one witness i.e. Mr. N. K. Gupta who according to them was the person on the spot at the time of the incident in question . Apart from evidence ofN. K. Gupta management also examined one SecurityOfficer Mr. Aijay Kumar whose evidence 1 have discussed in details above . He cannot be considered as an eye witness as because of the fact that he was not present on the spot at the relevant time of the incident. This witness also in course of his evidence admitted this fact. It is evident complainant for disposal or not. On the contrary this witness during cross -examination admitted that the concerned workman never approached previously regarding his leave. It is also not evident if R. C. Singh was the controlling authority of the concerned workman and was incharge of sanctioning any leave to the concerned workman . The chargesheet while speaks that R. C. Singh was chargedby the concerned workman why he was not granting leave to the employees the statement of R. C. Singh on the contrary appears to be different on that point . During hearing management have failed to examine Durga Mahato who was an eye witness of the incident in question. Considering the statement of N. K. Gupta it transpires that on the relevant date and time he was on leave . However, he was present on the spot with a view to line upjob of his section and went to 15 Pit Top between 1.15 to 1. 30 A.M. This witness disclosed that when he was talking with the miners he noticed the concerned workman to talk with R. C. Singh. Sometimes after, the said person came to him and shook his hand and asked him " SAHEB AAP MARE GHAR KHANA KHANE CHALEYA" . This witness disclosed as the concerned workman was at that time in drunken state he helped him to move towards lamp cabin from pit top. At that time he found a Pistol with the concerned workman . He presumed the pistol as toy pistol . This witness did not disclose in which part of the body of the concerned workman he found the pistol. When this witness disclosed that the delinquent shook hand with him in that case it was not possible on his part to possess the alleged pistol in his hand becuase ofthe fact that it is not possible on the part ofa person to shake hand with pistol in his hand . From the statement ofAjay Kumar, Security Officer it transpires that on 19-6-1994 at about 1.30 A.M. Mr. R. C. Singh came to his control room from the colliery site and informed that one person came on the pit top with his mouth covered and thereafter the said person placed revolver on his chest and asked him why he was not granting leave . Said R. C. Singh further disclosed that somehow after getting his escape from his hand he came there with a view to inform the incident in question. After receiving the said news he rushed to the spot but did not find the delinquent i.e. the concerned workman. During cross-examination N. K. Gupta firmlydisclosed that he did not find the concerned workman to place revolver on the chest of R. C. Singh . He only found him to talk with R. C. Singh and a pistol was in his hand. He further admitted that while the concerned workman was talking with R. C. Singh his face was not covered with anything. Therefore , ifthe cross -examination of N. K. Gupta is taken into consideration it will expose clearly that he made an exaggerated statement to the Security Officer Ajay Kumar after coming to control room. It is also curious to note that though R. C. Singhby name and face was acquainted with the concerned workman , instead of disclosing his name disclosed to the Security Officer that oneperson at the Pit Top No. 15 on 19-6-1994 at 1.30 A.M. cameto him and placed revolver on his chest , covered his mouth and asked him why he was not granting leave . This witness 1 have already discussed, did not state anything whether he was leave sanctioning authority of the concernedworkman and if any such leave application was pending to him. Therefore , it is not at all clear for granting 9007 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

on such terms and conditions , if any, as it thinks fit, or give such other relief to the workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstances of the case may require . "

that not only Mr. N. K. Gupta but also many other persons were present on the spot at the time of the incident in question and according to the evidence of the witnesses i.e. N. K. Gupta and R. C. Singh, they also witnessed the incident in question. It is clear that R. C. Singh, is the sole officer who was present on the spot at the time ofincident. Therefore, before giving importance to his evidence it has tobe looked into whether the allegation made by him against the concernedworkman/delinquent has got its support by independent witness who were present at that time and saw the incident . It is really astonishing to note that in spite of getting ample scope management did not consider necessary to examine any independent witness with a view to corroborate the incident in question as alleged by R. C. Singh excepting the evidence of N. K. Gupta. I have carefully discussed the evidence of N. K. Gupta above and ithas beenexposed clearly that the allegation which Mr. R. C. Singh brought against the concerned workman/ delinquent did not find its support from his evidence .

Therefore, according to this provision it has to be looked into whether the said order of dismissal was justified orproportionateto the offence committed by the concerned workman/delinquent . It is really astonishing to note that the Disciplinary authority also did not apply their mind before imposing punishment upon the concerned workman. Just based on the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer theDisciplinary Authority decided to dismiss him from his service . Dismissal of the concerned workman from his service based on the enquiry report I should say has violated all the principles of natural justice in view of my discussion above . I find no hesitation to say that such order of dismissal issued by the Disciplinary Authority was neither justified nor proportionate to any offence committed by him . In view of my discussion above I hold management have failed to sustantiate the charge against the concerned workman totally and knowing fully well of this fact they only for the prestige of an Officer did not hesitate to dismiss the concerned workman from his service arbitrarily and illegaly. Therefore, the said order of dismissal as is not justified or proportionate is liable to be set aside . In the result, the following Award is rendered :----

"The action of the management of Bhelatand Coltiery of M/s . TISCO in dismissing Shri Dharam Singh, Chainman, P. No. 214574 of Project Section, Bhelatand under Clause 19 (5 ) ofthe certified standing order ofthe company vide dismissal order No. PROJ/ AB/2090 dated 26th October, 1994, w.e.f. 1-11-1994 is not justified . Consequently, he is entitled to get reinstatement to his original post of Chainman w.e.f. 1-11-1994 . He is also entitled to get 25% back wages from the date of his dismissal to the date of his reinstatement with other consequential benefit

Management is directed to implement the Award withinthree months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light ofthe observation made above .

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer The allegation which was brought against the concerned workman was very serious in nature and therefore close scrutiny was expected on the part of the Enquiry Officer before holding the concerned workman guilty to the charge . It is seen that the Enquiry Officer without scanning the evidence of the witness presented by the manageinent was very much busy to discuss with the alibi taken by the concerned workman/delinquent . It reveals from his report how he found the concerned workman guilty to the charges as he failed to establish the alibi taken by him . The Enquiry Officer has totally forgotten either or did not consider necessary to follow the principle ofnatural justice . Question of believing or disbelieving the alibi only would come after establishment of charge brought against the concerned workman/delinquent by the management . It is seen that the Enquiry Officer without scanning the evidence of management witnesses properly just relying on his finding relating to alibi taken by the concerned workman came to his conclusion that he was found guilty to the charges brought against him under clause 19 (5 ) of the Certified Standing Order. In view of my discussion above I find no hesitation to say that the management have failed to substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman . The concerned workman accordingly deserves benefit of doubt.

नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई , 2005

It is scen that management based on the enquiry report dismissed the concerned work man from his service . The order of dismissal during evidence of Enquiry Officer was marked as Ext . M- 9. Now the point for consideration is whether the concerned workman deserves any relief u /s . 11A of the I. D. Act . Section 11A of the Act speaks as follows:-

का. आ. 2774.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 86/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/65/98- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 8th July, 2005

S.O. 2774. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 86/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , "Where an industrial dispute relating to the discharge or dismissal of a workman has been referred to a Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal for adjudication and. in the course of the adjudication proceedings , the Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal , as the case may be , is satisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal was not justified, it may, by its award , set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of the workman 9008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-7-2005.

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

[No. L-20012/65/98 - IR (C -I) ]

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

ShriB. Biswas, PresidingOfficer

Inthematter ofan Industrial Disputeunder Section 10( 1 ) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 REFERENCE NO . 86 OF 1999

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of KusundaArea No. 6 of M/ s . BCCL and theirworkman.

APPEARANCES :

Onthebahalfofthe workman : Mr. S. N. Goswami, Ld. Advocate; Onbehalfof the employers : Mr. B. M. Prasad and Mr. A. K. Sinha, Ld. Advocates .

STATE: JHARKHAND :INDUSTRY:Coal Dated, Dhanbad, the 16th June, 2005

AWARD

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of thepowers conferred on them under Section 10 (1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/65/ 98 - IR(C-I) , dated, the 22nd Januy, 1999.

SCHODE

"Whether the action of the management of Kusunda Area of BCCL in dismissing/ stopping the workman Shri Samru Harijan, Miner Loader of Industry Colliery from 2-10- 1995 although date of birth of workman recorded in different records is 10-5-1939 is justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

2.The case of the concerned workman according to written statement submitted by the sponsoring union on hisbehalf in brief is as follows :

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workman was initially appointed at Industry Colliery on 29-6-65 as Miner Loader by the erstwhile owner and at that time his date of birth in the Form -B Register vide Sl . No. 491was recorded as 10-5-1939. His I.D. Card No. was 53526 and CMPF A/ c No. was C/362362 . They submitted that in the I. D. Card which was issued to him by the present management after nationalisation of the said colliery his date ofbirth also was recorded as 10-5-39. In the year 1987 management issued service excerpt to him wherein also his date ofbirth was recorded as 10-5-39 . As date of birth in the service excerpt was correctly recorded he did not find reason to raise any dispute over his date ofbirth .

They alleged that all of a sudden management issued superannuation notice to the concerned workman mentioning the date of his superannuation as 20-10-95 without any basis and prior to his attaining the age of 60 years . They further alleged that management on the basis ofthatnotice illegally and arbitrary violating the principle ofnatural justice superannuated him w.e.f. 20-10-95 and for which they submitted several representations to recall that illegal order of superannuation but as management refused to consider their representations they raised Industrial Dispute before ALC ( C) for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication .

They accordingly submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman to his work and allow him to remain in service till his attaining age of 60 years according to date of birth recorded in the Form -B Register with back wages and other consequential relief.

3.Management on the contrary after filing written stateinent-cum - rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the written statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workman.

They submitted that there was no question of dismissal or stopping of service of the concemed workman on the ground that he superannuated from service on attaining the age of sixty years .

Theydisclosed that in Sl . No. 491 ofthe Form -B Register after some interpretation his date of birth was recorded as 10-3-1930. They alleged that the said interpretation was made bythe concerned workman in connivance with others . They disclosed that in F.D.P. date of birth of the concerned workmanwas recorded as 20-10-35 and relying on the said dateofbirth he superannuated from service on 20-10-95 and afterhis superannuation he withdrew his CMPF money and gratuity amount.

They submitted that neither they committed any illegality nor took any arbitrary decision superannuating the concerned workman from his service and for which they submitted their prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the sponsoring union .

4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

"Whether the action of the management of Kusunda Arca of BCCL in dismissing/ stopping the workman Shri Samru Harijan , Miner Loader of Industry Collicry from 2-10-1995 although date of birth of workman recorded in different records is 10-5-1939 is justified? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?" .

5. Findings with Reasons

Ittranspires from the record that management witha view to substantiate their claim examined one witness as M.W. 1. The sponsoring union on the contrary inspite of getting ample opportunity did not consider necessary to adduce any evidence.

Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides alsó considering material documents in the record I find nodispute to hold that the concerned workman 9009

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

got his appointment by the erstwhile owner as Miner/ Loader at Industry Colliery.

No satisfactory explanation is forthcoming on the part ofthe management why inin course of hearing they have failed to produce the Form -B Register for perusal of this Tribunal to consider how the date of birth of the concernedworkman was interpretated therein.

It is the specific contention of the sponsoring union that all particulars including date ofbirth of the concerned workman were recorded in the Form-B register while he joined his service. They submitted further that in Sl . No. 461 of the said Form -B Register the date of birth of the concerned workman was recorded as 10-5-1939 . Subsequently, ID Card baring No. 53526 was issued to him wherein also his of birth was recorded as 10-5-39 . They further disclosed that in the year 1987 management issued service except to the concerned workman for verification ofthe particulars including date of birth recorded therein by the workman . In the said service excerpt his date of birth was also recorded as 10-5-1939 . Their contension is that as date of birth was correctly recorded in the service excerpt there was no question at all to raise any dispute over his date of birth. Accordingly, submission of the sponsoring is that not only in the Form - B Register but also in the ID Card and Service excerpt issued to him the same date ofbirth i.c. 10-5-1939 was recorded . As such his date of superannuation falls in 10-5-1999.

Dateofbirth recorded in EDP has no statutory force until and unless it is established that the said entry was recorded from Statutory Register . It is not the case ofthe management that they did neither issued identity card nor service excerpt to the concerned workman . It is also not their case that entries made in the ID Card and Service Excerptwere manipulated by the concerned workman. It is their case as per para 11 ofthe written statement that date ofbirth recorded in the Form-B register vide Sl . No. 491 was 10-3-1930 which had been manipulated in connivance with others . The Form - B register remains under custody of the Management . Therefore, onus on them to establish how that date of birth of the concerned workman was manipulated . Apart from this fact it transpires that while in EDP date ofbirth ofthe concerned workman is appearing as 20-10-35 . On the contrary luis date of birth in the ID Card and service excerpt are appearing as 10-5-39. The ID Card was issued in favour of the workman by the management on 26-10-73 while Service Excerpt was issued on 2-1-88 under signature of the management official. Therefore , there is sufficient reason to believe that till date of issuance of Service Excerpt there was no allegation of interpolation ofdate ofbirth of the concerned workman in the Form-B Register so the service excerpt was prepared inconsultation with the same .

The dispute in the instant case was cropped up when notice of superannuation was issued to the concerned workmandt . 17-2-95 wherein his date of superannuation was mentioned as 20-10-95 . It is the contention of the management that date of birth of the concerned workman in the Form -B Register after manipulation by the workman in connivance with others was recorded as 10-3-1930 . They submitted that from E.D.P. It exposed that date of birth of the concerned workman was recorded 20-10-1935 and by way of superannuation notice date of superannuation of the concerned workman from service was fixed on 20-10-95.

It is not the claim of the concerned workman that his date ofbirth was 10-3-1930. He although claimed that his date of birth is 10-5-1939 and in support of his claim he relied on ID Card bearing No. 53526 and service excerpt. From the copies of the ID Card and Service excerpt ofthe concerned workman which are lying in the record it speaks clearly that date of birth of the concerned workman was 10-5-1939 . Accordingly, there was no scope at all to raise any dispute over his date ofbirth .

I have already discussed above that EDP is not a statutory document . Therefore , before accepting his date ofbirth as recorded in EDP onus on the manageinent to establish from which statutory register they collected the said date of birth , i.c. 20-10-35 . 1 have already discussed above that in course of hearing. Management have failed to produce the Form- B register before this Tribunal for verification . Considering my discussion above it is clear that in different records different date of birth of the concerned workman is appearing . As per guide line of JBCCI Circular date of birth recorded in the Form-B register shall be binding on both sides if no gross discrepency is defected. As per para II ofthe written statement it is claim ofthe management that date of birth recorded therein was interpretated but did not disclose what was his actual date of birth of the concerned workman . Entries in the I D Register are also made from the Form-B Register. Management did not consider necessary to produce the ID Register to show that date of birth of the concerned workman was recorded as 20-10-1935 . As it is not the case of the management that date of birth of the concerned workman in the ID Card as well as in the Service Excerpt was recorded wrongly the same stands. Accordingly when it transpires that different date of birth of the concernedworkman are appearing in different documents ofthe management as per JBCCI circular No. 76 they had the responsibility to assess the age of the concerned through Apex Medical Board but ignoring that provision they superannuated the concerned workman from his service just relying on the date of birth recorded in the There is no dispute at all to say that Fom -B register is a Statutory Register as per Mines Act and particulars recorded therein are binding on both sides .It is the allegation of the management that after interpolation of the date of birth recorded in the Form-B register it was written as 10-3-1930 . It is an incredible story to believe on the ground that if any interpolation in date of birth is done in that case it is done in that manner so that the workman can get scope of extra length of service . There is no worker who is so fooled to make such interpoation in his date of birth for the purpose of advancing his date of superannuation . Therefore , it is not at all believable that by way of interpretation he intended to get his superannuation at an early date than the date ofhis actual superannuation . Had that been so he would not definitely raise Industrial Dispute challenging his date of superannuation fixed by the management .

9010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

EDP which is not at all to be considered as statutory document, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice. They even did not consider representation submitted by the sponsoring union against pre - mature superannuation of the concerned workman.

It can not be considered as a plea at all that the concerned workman has been debarred from raising Industrial Dispute as he after superannuation withdrew hisall claims . It is to be borne into mind that a poor workman is not such solvent that without withdrawing his dues after his superannuation he willbe capable to raise his voice against arbitrary action taken by the management .

Here the question is whether management was justified in superannuating the concerned workman considering his date ofbirth as 20-10-1935. In view of my discussion above I say firmly that management took arbitrary decision in superannuating the concerned workman from his service holding his date of birth as 20-10-1935 without getting the same verified by the Apex Medical Board particularly when in their own documents his different date of birth had been recorded and that can so be done in reliance to the provision as laid down in J.B. C.C.I. Circular.

Inthe result the following award is rendered:

That the action of the Management of Kusunda Area of BCCL in dismissing/stopping the workman Shri Samru Harijan, M/ Loader of Industry Colliery from 2-10-95 although date of birth of workman recorded in different records is 10-5-1939 is not justified.

Management accordingly is directed to assess the age of the concerned workman through Apex MedicalBoard strictly as per guide line of the Medical jurisprudence within three months from the date of publication of the award in the Gazette of India. The result of the Apex Medical Board will be strictly binding on both sides.

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer . नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2775.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को . को . लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 77/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जी केन्द्रीय सरकार को6-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-20012/32/ 2003- आई आर( सी- I ) ] एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 8th July, 2005

S.O. 2775.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.77/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-07-2005 .

[No. L- 20012/32/2003 -IR(C- 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy .

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL . ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :

Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 Reference No. 77 of 2003

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Kusunda Area ofM/ s . BCCL and their workman APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman Onbehalf of the employers

: None : Mr. S. N. Ghosh Advocate .

STATE : Jharkhand

:Industry: Coal Dhanbad, the 27th day of June , 2005 AWARD

The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/32 / 2003, IR(C- I ) dated, the 19th August , 2003 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of East Bassuria Colliery of M/ s . BCCL in dismissing SriAjitBouri from the services ofthe company w.c.f. 21-10-98 is fair and justified ? If not to what relief is the concerned workman entitled?"

2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared before this Tribunal. Management, however, made appearance through their authorized representative . It reveals from the record that the instant reference is pending since 3-2-2004 for disposal . Record also further shows that notices and show cause notice were issued to the workman side consecutively. In terms of Rule 10 (b) of the ID Central Rules , 1957 it is mandatory on the part of the concerned workman/ sponsoring union to file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents list of reliance and witnesses before the Tribunal within fifteen days from receipt of the order of reference . The concerned workman/ sponsoring union not only violated the above rules but also did not consider necessary to respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . Gesture of the workman/ sponsoring union ifis taken into consideration will expose clearly that they are not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case. Under the circumstances , this Tribunal also finds no ground to adjourn the case suo moto for causing appearance of the workman/ sponsoring union. Hence the case is closed and accordingly a ' No dispute ' Award is passed in this reference presuming non - existence of any industrial dispute between the parties.

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2776.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्याथालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 36/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 20012/234/2002- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th July, 2005

S.O. 2776. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 36/ 2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Dhanbad - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 6-7-2005 .

[No. L -20012/234/2002 - IR ( C -I) ] S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2 ) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act . 1947 REFERENCE NO . 36 OF 2003

PARTIES:

Entployers in relation to the management of Kusunda Area ofM/ s . BCCL and their workman .

APPEARANCES : On behalf of the Workman : Mr. S.N. Goswami , Advocate

On behalf of the Employers : Mr. U.N. Lal , Advocate . State : Jharkhand Industry: Coal

Dated the 27th June , 2005 AWARD

The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/ 234/2002 - IR (C - I ) , dated, the 10th March, 2003 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the managerment of Kusunda Area ofM/ s. BCCL in denying promotion as Asstt . Foreman T & S Grade ' C ' to Sri Haripad Rewani is fair and justified ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ? "

9011

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

2. In this reference both the parties appeared and filed their respective Written Statement and documents etc. The case then proceeded along its course. Subsequently at the stage of oral evidence Learned Advocate for the workman submitted his prayer to pass a No dispute Award in this reference as the concerned workman involved in it is not interested to proceed with the hearing of this case . No objection raised on behalf of the management in view ofthe prayer made by the Learned Advocate for the workman . Heard both sides . As the concerned workman is not interested to proceed with the case there is no reason to adjourn the case for further hearing. Hence, the case is closed and accordingly a No dispute Award is passed in this reference presuming non- existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2777.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को. को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 45/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 20012/24/ 2003- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th July, 2005

S.O. 2777.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 45/. 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Dhanbad - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 6-7-2005 .

[No. L-201012/24/ 2003 - IR ( C - 1 ) ] S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) ofthe I.D. Act . 1947 .

REFERENCE NO . 45 OF 2003

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of Kustore Area ofM/ s . BCCL and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the Workman : Mr. Ram Rattan Ram . Advocate 9012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-S 3( ii) ] Mr. U.N. Lal , Advocate.

Onbehalf of the Employers :

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 28th June, 2005

AWARD

The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012 / 24/ 2003 - IR ( C - I) , dated, the 13th June , 2003 ,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL , Kustore Area to dismiss Sri Gurucharan Paswan from service w.e. f. 20-6-2001 is justified ? If not ,to what relief is the workman entitled? "

2. Case of the concerned workman according to Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring union on behalf in brief is as follows :-

Disciplinary Authority decided to hold domestic enquiry against him and for which they appointed Enquiry Officer. The Enquiry Officer in course of hearing enquiry proceeding gave full opportunity to the concerned workman to defend his case . They further submitted that, the said Enquiry Officer after completing domestic enquiry submitted his report holding the concerned workman guilty to the charges brought against him . After completion of the enquiry proceeding all papers relating to the same were provided to the concerned workman vide letter No. BCCL/KC / 2001 / 492 dated 29-3/ 4-4-2001 with advice to submit his views within 15 days from the date of receipt of the said papers . He submitted his reply on 13-4-2001 which was not found satisfactory. The Disciplinary Authority thereafter considering the enquiry report , all materials on record including the reply of the concerned workman and also considering the past record decided to dismiss him from his service and accordingly vide letter No. BCCL / KA/ 2001 / 893 dated 12 / 20-6-2001 he was dismissed from service after obtaining formal approval from the General Manager, Kustore Area . They disclosed that past record ofthe concerned workman relating to his attendance was absolutely very bleak . They submitted that in the year 1996 and 1997 the concerned workman did not work for a single day while in the year 1998 he worked for 94 days . Accordingly they submitted that they did not commit any illegality or took any arbitrary decision in dismissing the concerned workman from his service and for which they submitted prayer to pass Award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman .

4. Points to be decided :

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL . KustoreArea to dismiss Sri Gurucharan Paswan front service w.e.f. 20-6-2001 is justified? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ? ""

5. Finding with reasons :

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workınan Gurucharan Paswan was a Minor/Loader at Kustore Colliery. He got his appointment on compassionate ground in place of his deceased father who was a workman of the said colliery. They submitted that the concerned workman as was suffering from a peculiar type ofdisease, left for his native village on 10-8-98 for his proper treatment on casual leave duly sanctioned for the period from 10-8-98 to 13-8-98 . As he was under the treatment of a Vaidya he could not attend to his place of work to perform his duties . On 13-10-99 the management issued a chargesheet to him to which he submitted his reply. They submitted that without accepting the said reply the Disciplinary Authority decided to hold domestic enquiry against him and the Enquiry Officer took about 2 years for conducting the said enquiry. Actually the said enquiry was started on 23-2-2001 without assigning any cogent ground and thereby deprived the concerned workman to perform his duty from 1999 to 2001. They further alleged that on the basis of the report of the Enquiry Officer the Disciplinary Authority dismissed him from service . After the said order of dismissal he made appeal before the management for his reinstatement in service but to no effect and for which he raised an Industrial Dispute for conciliation before the ALC ( C) which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . Accordingly, sponsoring union submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman to his service setting aside the order of dismissal with full back wages and other consequential relief.

It transpires from the record that before taking up hearing of this case on merit it was taken into consideration ifdomestic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice. From the record it transpires that vide Order No. 8 dated 25-1-2005 the said issue on preliminary point was disposed of in favour of the management . Now the point for consideration is whether the management have been able to substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman and if so it is to be looked into if the order of punishment imposed upon the concerned workman can be reviewed in view of the provision as laid down under Section 11A of the I.D. Act . 1947 .

3.Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement- cum - rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegation which the sponsoring union asserted in the Written Statement subinitted on behalf of the concerned workman . Management admitted that the concerned workman was a Miner / Loader and posted at Kustore Colliery. They submitted that for committing misconduct on the ground of unauthorised absence under clause 26.1.1 a Chargesheet was issued to him vide No. BCCL / KC/99/ 1997 dated 13 / 14-10-99 . As the reply submitted by the concerned workman was not satisfactory, the

Considering the pleadings and also considering all materials on record I find no dispute to hold that the concerned workman was posted at Kustore Colliery as Miner /Loader. It also transpires that he , on compassionate ground , was appointed as Miner / Loader by the management in place of his deceased father who was also a worker of the said colliery . The chargesheet during hearing was marked as Ext. M- 10 . It transpires from the chargesheet that the same was issued to the concerned workman with the allegation of committing misconduct on 9013 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

peculiar thing which has been noticed in course ofhearing is that when Chargesheet was issued by the management to the concerned workman with allegation that the concernedworkman started remaining himself absent from duty with effect form 6-8-1998 without giving any intimation from the management the Enquiry Officer observed categorically that the concerned workman was onsanctioned casual leave from 10-8-98 to 13-8-98 and he was to resume duty on 148-98. It is also the contention of the concerned workman that he started remaining himself absent from duty w.e.f. 14-8-98. Therefore, it is not at all correct to say that the concerned workman started remaining himself absent from duty without giving any intimation or taking prior permission from the management w.e.f. 6-8-98 . Therefore, it is clear that the chargesheet issued against the concerned workman stands vitiated on the ground that a person who remains on authorised leave of a particular period cannot be termed that he is on unauthorised leave . It is therefore clear that the management was biased in issuing the chargesheet against the concerned workman. In course of hearing management has failed to justify why they issued chargesheet to the concerned workman holding that he remained on unauthorised absence from duty with effect from 6-8-98 particularly when it has been exposed clearly that from 10-8-98 to 13-8-98 he was on authorised casual leave duly sanctioned by the management . It is really shocking to note that the Enquiry Officer did not consider this fact when he submitted his reply to the Disciplinary Authority after completingdomestic enquiry. This attitude of the EnquiryOfficerwill speak that he was not fair in arriving into decision against the concerned workman. It is seen that the Disciplinary Authoriity after considering the enquiry report and also considering reply given by the concerned work man dismissed him from his service vide letter dtd. 12/20-6-2001 which during hearing was marked as Ext . M- 1 . Now the point for consideration is whether such order of dismissal can be reviewed in view of the provision under Section 11A of the I.D. Act. , 1947. Section 11A of the 1. D. Act speaks as followas :-

"Where an industrial dispute relating to the discharge or dismissal of a workman has been referred to a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal for adjudication and, in the course of the adjudication proceedings , the Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal , as the case may be , is satisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal was not justified, it may, by its award , set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of the workman on such terms and conditions, ifany, as it thinks fit, or give such other relief to the workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal asthe circumstances of the case may require ."

According to this provision it has to be looked into if the order of dismissal issued by the Disciplinary Authority against the concerned workman was justified and proportionate to the misconduct conducted by him . There is no dispute to hold that the concerned workman w.e.f. 14-8-98 started remaining himselfabsent from duty the ground of his remaining unauthorised absence from duty with effect from 6-8-98 under clause 26.1.1 of the Certified Standing Order applicable to the workman ofthe management . By the said chargesheet the concerned workman was directed to submit his reply within 48 hours after receipt of the same. Therefore , according to chargesheet it transpires that from 6-8-98 to 14-10-99 the concernedworkman was absent from duty without taking prior permission or giving due information to the management . Reply given by the concerned workman to the chargesheet during hearing was marked as Ext . M-9. In reply he disclosed that for the treatittent of his epilepsy hewas compelled to remain himself absent from duty w.e.f. 14-8-98 and accordingly submitted his prayer for condoning the period of his absence during the period in question and allowed him to resume his duty. Management decided to hold domestic enquiry against the concerned workman as the reply given by him was not satisfactory and accordingly appointed Enquiry Officer to hold domestic enquiry against him. It is the contention of the concerned workman that he was a patient of epilepsy and for which he had to remain under treatment of a Vaidya for a long period. From the enquiry proceeding papers 1 find some medical papers marked as Ext . M-4 series which supports his claim that he was a patient of epilepsy. However, these medical papers which are lying with the enquiry proceeding papers shows that the same were issued time to time long before his committing misconduct under clause 26.1.1 as alleged by the management . I have considered the Enquiry Report submitted by the enquiry Officer marked as Ext . M-3 . From the enquiry report it transpires that the concerned workman was on sanctioned casual leave for a period from 10-8-98 to 13-8-98 and he had to join his duty on 14-8-98 . It has been observed by the Enquiry Officer that since 14-8-98 the concerned workman remained himself absent without giving any intimation or taking prior permission from the management . The Enquiry Officer further in his enquiry report observed thatduring 1996 and 1997 the concerned workman did not work for a single day while during the year 1998 he worked for 94 days . Disclosing this fact it has been observed by the Enquiry Officer that the concerned workman was a habitual absentee and for which he does not deserve any sympathy holding compassionate view to allow him to resume his duty. From the report ofthe Enquiry Officer I have failed to find out any material ingredient if the concerned workman remained himself absent from duty during the entire period of 1996 and 1997 without giving any intimation or prior permission from the management . It is really curious to note that the management did not take any action against the concerned workman as per provision of clause 26.1.1 of the Certified Standing Order inspite of his remaining continuous absence from duty for the period of two years . When the management did not take any action there is sufficient reason to believe that they accepted the absence of the concerned workman and allowed him to work. When no action was taken against him by the management at this stage management cannot agitate this issue and also cannot take it as a ground for taking action against him. Moreover, chargesheet issued tothe concerned workman is also silent on this point . The

2211GI/2005-39 9014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

श्रम न्यायालय, धनबाद- I के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 74/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं . एल. 20012/708/97- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 8th July, 2005

S.O. 2778. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 74/ 1998) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Dhanbad - I now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the Employers in relation to management of BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 6-7-2005 .

[No. L - 210012/708/97 - IR (C- I) ] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , AT DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference Under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) ( 2A) ofthe Industrial .Disputes Act . , 1947 REFERENCE NO . 74 OF 1998

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of BCCL

AND

Their Workmen

Present: SHRI S. PRASAD , Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers

: Sh . R.N. Ganguly, Advocate .

For the of the Workman : Sh . T.P. Jha, Advocates

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal without taking prior permission or giving any intimation to the management . From the Enquiry Report it is clear that the concerned workman was on sanctioned casual leave from 10-8-98 to 13-8-98 . Knowing fully well ofthis fact management issued chargesheet on the allegation of committing misconduct by the concerned workman for remaining himself absent from duty w.e.f. 6-8-98 though at that relevant time he was very much on duty. As the management have failed to substantiate this fact with cogent reason it should be taken into consideration that chargesheet issued to the concerned workman was not only bad in law but the same is liable to be vitiated . Apart from this fact it is further seen that after issuing of chargesheet the management allowed the concerned workman 48 hours time to subnut his reply. Clause 27.1 of the Certified Standing Order speaks clearly that where a workman is charged with a misconduct which may lead to imposition of a minor penalty he shall be informed in writing ofthe allegation made against him and shall be given an opportunity to explain his conduct within 48 hours . The management is at liberty to impose penalty of misconduct on the ground of committing misconduct which appears tobe minor in nature . Clause 29 ( 1 ) of the Certified Standing Order does not empower the management who would issue the order of dismissał against a workman for committing minor penalties . Therefore , from the outset it can be said that the Disciplinary Authority being biased illegally and arbitrarily violating the principle of natural justice dismissed the concerned workman from his service when by issuing chargesheet their clear intention was to impose minor penalty if misconduct committed by him is established during enquiry proceeding. Accordingly there is no dispute to hold that the order of dismissal issued by the Disciplinary Authority was not only unjustified but also disproportionate to the misconduct committed by the concerned workman . In view of my discussions above I hold that the order of dismissal issued by the Disciplinary Authority against the concerned workman is liable to be set aside . In the result , the following Award is rendered:-

Dated the 30th June , 2005 AWARD

By Order No. L -20012/708/ 97 - IR ( C- I ) dated 10-9- 1998 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Acı , 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"The action of the management of BCCL , Kustore Area to dismiss Sri Gurucharan Paswan from service w.c.f. 20-6-2001 is not justified . Consequently, the concerned workman is entitled to be reinstated in his original post w.e.f. 20-6-2001 but without any back wages . He is however, entitled to get other benefits "

"Whether the action of the management in not regularising Sri Awadh Bihari Pandey to the post of coaldespatch clerk in Golakdih O.C.P. is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled?"

Management is directed to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the observations made above.

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई , 2005

2. It appears from the petition filed by Shri T.P. Jha , Advocate , on behalf of the workman , that the concerned workman has already expired and Mr. Jha has also prayed to close the dispute.

3. In view of such submission , I render a No Dispute Award in the present reference case .

S. PRASAD , Presiding Officer का. आ. 2778.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ 9015 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005 /श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई, 2005

484/96 - IR (C - II) dated 20-5-98 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Kumardhi A Colliery under Bankola Area of M/s ECL is justified in dismissing Sh. Bindheswari Singh, Peon w.e.f. 14-4-90 % If not what relief the workman is entitled to .?"

का. आ. 2779.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण असनसोल (संदर्भ संख्या 9/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल . 22012/484/96- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th July, 2005

2. After having received the aforesaid order of reference from the Govt . of India through the Ministry of Labour, summons were issued to the respective parties through the registered post and in pursuance ofthe service ofthe notices both the parties appeared in the Court .

S.O. 2779. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of ECL and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 11-7-2005 .

3. From perusal of the record its transpires that due to regular absence of the parties a No Dispute Award was passed on 16-11-98 by the Presiding Officer . Thereafter a restoration perition was filed by the workman which was registered and on issuance of the notice the management appeared . The restoration petition was pressed by the parties and hearing both the sides the prayer was allowed and the case was restored in its original file and the dispute vsaken up for final hearing on the same day.

[No. L-22012/484/96 - IX ( C- II) N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

4. Heard be th the parties on merit ofthe case . It was jointly sub nittedthat both the parties have amicably settled their dispute and to that effect a Memorandom of settlement was filed in the Court . Both the parties submitted that an award in the light of settlement be passed .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : SRI MD . SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO . 9 OF 1998

PARTIES :

...Management

The Agent, Kumardihi ' A' Colly. , P.O. Ukhra, Distt. Burdwan

Vs.

Sri Bindeshwari Singh , Peon Represented by the Jt. General Secretary, CollieryMazdoor Union ,

5. Perused the record . It transpires that a Memorandum of settlement dated 14-8-2002 duly signed bythe respective parties has been filed. It is clearly agreed and resolved that the workman concerned confirmed the order of termination and the management shall pay all outstanding dues including CMPF refund, gratuity payment, leave payment, family pension given to the workman Binderhwari Singh within a period of two months where ever possible or action will be taken as the case may be. It is clear from the contents of the Memorandum of settlement that both the parties have resolved the dispute in the light of the terms and condition agreed between them . As such it is hereby ordered that let an award be passed in the light of the terms and condition of the settlement. The Memorandum or settlement so filed shall from part of the award. Send the copies of the award to the Ministry of Labour for information and needful .

Workman

P.O. Ukhra, Distt. Burdwan

MD. SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer REPRESENTATIVES :

Sri P.K.Das , Advocate

नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2005

For the Management

Sri M. Mukherjee ,

For the Workman (Union) :

State: WEST BENGAL

Industry: COAL

Dated the 28th April , 2005

AWARD

का. आ. 2780.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, सी.पी.डब्लू.डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक प्रकरण, लखनऊ (संदर्भ संख्या 4/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो के द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[गं. एल. 42012/107/2003- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , Govt . of India through the Ministry ofLabour vide its letter No. L- 22012/ 9016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

New Delhi , the 11th July, 2005

S.O. 2780.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 4/2004) ofthe Central Govt. Indus . Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the management of CPWD and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 11-7-2005.

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)]

[No. L-42012/107/2003 - IR(C -II) ]

N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

Present: SHRIKANT SHUKLA

Presiding Officer

L.D. NO : 4/2004

Ref. No. L--42012/107/2003 - IR (CM- II) dated 26-11-2003

BETWEEN

The Zonal President

All India CP.W.D. -MRM Karmchari Sangthan Survey of India, Mussorie Mussorie (Uttaranchal )

(In the matter of Sh . Rajender Kumar )

AND

The Executive Engineer Bareilly Central Division, CPWD 9-A, Premnagar, Bareilly Bareilly(UP)

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , vide their Order No. L-42012/ 107/2003 - IR (CM- II) dated 26-11-2003 has referred following dispute to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , Lucknow for adjudication.

"Whether the action of the management of CPWD inplacing Sh. Rajender Kumar from Motor Lorry Driver Scale to Beldar Scale w.e.f. 25-11-1986 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief he is entitled ?" 2. The admitted fact is that Sh . Rajender Kumar S/o Sh. Lakshmi Narayan had been working as a Motor Lorry Driver under the Executive Engineer Bareilly Central Division CPWD Bareilly in the pay scale of Rs . 260-400 w.e.f. 28-2-1986 . Unfortunately Sh. Rajender Kumar met with an accident and was unable to drive jeep . Therefore the worker requested the management of CPWD to give him some light duty till he is fully fit for driving vehicle vide his application dated 7-11-1986. The management exceeded his request and he was allotted work of Beldar w.e.f. 25-11-1986 in the pay scale of Rs. 750-940 .

The case of the trade union i.e. All India CPWD- MRM Karmchari Sanghthan is that, the Sh. Rajendra Kumar was in the pay scale of 260-400, at the time of accident when he was motor lorry driver, which was subsequently revised to pay scale of Rs . 950-1500 and his salarywas fixed at Rs . 970 on 27-2-86 . The trade union has further stated that worker was directed by the Executive Engineer Bareilly CPWD to appear before the Transport Authorities for test on 26-9-97 and the transport authorities Bareilly found the workman fit for driving four wheeler . Sh . Rajender Kumar represented to the authorities concerned for taking him as motor lorry driver or equivalent post with pay as was being drawn by him earlier . But he was not reinstated on the post of motor lorry driver and still working as Beldar and is facing financial crises . The worker was entitled to the appointment on equivalent post carrying the same pay scale as of motor lorry driver when the workman has met with an accident on which account theworker was discriminated and placed on the lower post witha lower pay scale . The action of the CPWD for placing the workmen on lower post carrying lower pay scale is unjust, illegal , malafide and discriminatory. The trade union has therefore requested to direct the opposite party to reinstate and regularise the worker as motor lorry driver or on some equivalent post to motor lorry driver and to fix his salary as are available to motor lorry driver w.e.f. 25-11-86 and release his back wages and allowances.

The management has filed the written statement and has admitted that Rajender Kumar requested the management of allow him light duty work, and the management acceded to his request to the extent of allotment ofwork of Beldar to him w.e.f. 22-11-86 , in the pay scale Rs. 750-940 . Roughly after 10 years , the workman again requested the management vide his letter dated 6-1-96 to revert him on the roll of motor lorry driver, for which the management fell it necessary that the workman must be holding a valid driving licence and a certificate issued from the transport authorities in regard to his fitness and ability to drive the vehicle properly. It has been denied thatthe transport authorities . Bareilly found the worker, Rajender Kumar fit for driving four wheeler. However, it is submitted by the management that for the complete satisfaction of the department, the management directed the workman to appear before the medical board for a detailed check-up. The medical board vide its letter dated 12-8-99 declared that the workman , Rajender Kumar was unfit to drive the vehicle , and therefore , he could not be re- instated on the post of motor lorry driver. It is further stated that the alleged claim of worker is concocted , and absolutely without any reason, or justification, hence not tenable in the eyes of law, and liable to be rejected outright . Just because he was declared unfit to drive the vehicle , and he does not have the requisite eligibility criteria for his being absorbed on other equivalent posts, the management could not accede to the request of the worker . In the circumstances the claim of the workman deserves outright rejection in the interest ofjustice , equity and fair play.

The worker has filed rejoinder wherein he has stated that according to Section 47 of " The Person with [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

9017

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and full Participation) Act, 1995, makes it clear that:

5. Letter No. 15 (PF) /BKM/4392 dtd . 5-8-99 addressed to CMO, Bareilly.

6. Letter No. M- 1/29/262 dtd. 12-8-99 of CMO, Bareilly addressed to Executive Engineer, CPWD.

7. Discharge summary ofworker, Rajender Kumar ofDistt. Hospital , Bareilly.

8. Prescription and cash memos of medicines takenby Rajender Kumar.

Heard oral submissions of parties and perused the record.

1. "No establishment shall dispense with, or reduce in rank, an employee who acquires a disability during his service . Provided that, if an employee, after acquiring disability is not suitable for the post he was holding, could be shifted to some other post with the same pay scale and service benefits . Provided further that if it is not possible to adjust the employee against any post , he may be kept on a supernumerary post until a suitable post is available or he attains the age of superannuation whichever is earlier.

2. No promotion shall be denied to a person merely on the ground of his disability; Provided that the appropriate government may, having regard to the type of work carried on in any establishment, by notification and subject to such conditions , if any, as may be specified in such notification, except any establishment from the provisions of this section."

Itis admitted fact of the parties that Rajender Kumar was appointed as ' Motor Lorry Driver ' and was working as such since Feb. 1986. However, the worker Rajender Kumar met with an accident on 22-7-86 . Subsequently , on 7-11-86 , Sh. Rajender Kumar moved an application addressed to Karyapalak Engineer, (Bareilly Devision) of CPWD, stating that he is unable to drive four wheeler jeep and he requested that he be posted as messanger in office so that he may get wages and continue with treatment , he futher wrote in application that when he is absolutely fit he will inform the Karyapalak Engineer. The copy of application dated 7-11-86 has been filed by both the partes with their pleading.

The worker has therefore prayed that the opposite partybe directed to reinstate and regularise the workman as motor lorry driver or on some other equivalent post with protection to his pay packgaes and the to award the salary as available to motor lorry driver w.e.f. 25-11-86 and all consequential benefits to the worker.

The trade union has examined the worker, Shri Rajender Kumar and the opposite party has examined Assistant Engineer , Sh. A.K. Saxena.

The worker has filed photo state copies offollowing documents:

Subsequently, on 25-11-86 the Karyapalak Engineer . passed an order No. 15 (PF)/PCD /7562-657 that since Sh . Rajender Kumar has been found suitable for light work by Medical Officer, District Hospital, Bareilly and therefore , he was posted as Beldar w.e.f. 22-11-86. The order further contained that in case Rejender Kumar is found medically fit he will be paid the salary applicable to the driver. By this order Sh. Rajender Kuinar was allowed the salary scale of750-12-870-14-940 w.e.f. 22-11-86 . The copy ofthe orders have been filed the parties .

1. Application ofworker dtd. 7-11-86 .

2. Office order of CPWD , Bareilly No. 15 (PF)/ BCD/7562-65 dtd. 25-11-87 .

3. Letter No. 15 (PF ) /BKM/ 2164 dtd. 22-9-97 addressed to the worker.

4. Letter No. 222/लाइसेंस/परीक्षण/97 dtd . 8-10-97 oftransport authorities addressed to CPWD.

5. Application or worker dtd. 6-1-96.

The issue referred is whether the action of the management ofCPWD in placing Sh . Rajender Kumar from MotorLorryDriver Scale to Beldar Scale w.e.f. 25-11-1986 is legal and justified? As such, this Tribunal has to see whether the order dated 25-11-86 in legal and justified? The worker has filed the extract of " Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and FullParticipation) Act, 1995 ( 1 of 1996) . The Section44 to 47 of which are as under:

6. Statement of claim filed by worker before ALC(C).

7. Reply to the statement of claim made by worker before ALC(C).

"44. Establishments in the transport sector shall , within the limits of their economic capacity and development for the benefit of persons with disabilities , take special measures to- 8. Rejoinder on behalf of the workman filed beforeALC(C).

The opposite party has filed photo state copies of

(a) adapt rail compartments , busses , vessels and aircrafts in such a way as to permit easy access to such persons;

following documents:

1. Application ofworker dtd . 7-11-86.

2. Office order of CPWD , Bareilly No. 15 (PF)/ BCD/7562-65 dtd. 25-11-87.

(b) adapt toilets in rail compartments, vessels , aircrafts and waiting rooms in such a way as to permit the wheel chair users to use tham conveniently.

3. Application ofworker dtd. 6-1-96.

45. The appropriate governments and the local authorities shall, within the limits of their economic capacity and development , provide for- 4. Letter No. 5 (1 )BCD/29 dtd. 22-7-99 addressed to CMO,Bareilly.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

9018

(a) installation of auditory signals at red lights in the public roads for the benefits of persons withvisually handicap;

(b) causing curb cuts and slopes to be made in pavements for the easy access of wheel chair users;

(d) engraving on the edges of railway platforms for the blind or for persons with low vision.

(e) devising appropriate symbols of disability ;

(f) warning signals at approporiate places.

46. The appropriate Governments and the local authorities shall , within the limits of economic capacity and development, provide for- (a) ramps in public buildings;

(b) adaptation of toilets for wheel chair users ;

(d) ramps in hospitals , primary health centres and other medical care and rehabilitation institutions.

47. (1) No establishment shall dispense with , or reduce in rank, an employee who acquires a disability during his service:

Provided that , if an employee , after acquiring disabilitiy is not suitable for the post he was holding, could be shifted to some other post with the same pay scale and service benefits :

Provided further that if it is not possible to adjust the employee against any post, he may be kept on a supernumerary post until a suitable post is available or he attains the age of superannuation , whichever is earlier. "

The worker has also filed the copy of Gazette of India , Extraordinary No. 84 , N. Delhi , Wednesday, February 7 , 1996 which provides as under :

" S.O 107 (E ) . In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities , Protection of rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, (1 of 1996), the Central Government hereby appoints the 7th day of Februnary, 1996 as the date on which the provisions of the said Act shall come into force ." Therefore, from the above this is undisputed that no establishment shall dispense with, or reduce in rank , an employee who acquires a disability during his service and this came into operation on 7th day of February, 1996 whereas the order in question was passed on 25-11-86, roughly above 9 years back. At the time of passing the impugned order dated 25-11-86 the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities , Protection of rights and FullParticipation) Act, 1995 (1 of 1996) was not applicable . Thisis established law that CGIT -cum -Labour Court cannot travel beyond the issue referred for its adjudication.

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] The worker on 6-1-96 represented that he is interested in driving the vehicle therefore , he be appointed on the post of driver in alternative he be provided the salary applicable to the post ofdriver . The department sent Rajender Kumar before the medical board of his medical fitness. The Chief Medical Officer, Bareilly vide his report dtd . 12-8-99 , declared the worker as unfit for the post of driver. The witness of the opposite party has also stated that Rajender Kumar suffers with the attack of paralysis for which he submits medical bills in support of his case the opposite party had filed the photostat copy of the report of the Chief Medical Officer , Bareilly and the photo- state copy of the precription and medical receipt of purchase of medicine. The report is placed as annexure VI to the pleading of the opposite party, which clearly proved that he was not fit to drive the vehicle .

The worker has not challenged the order dated 25-11-86 till he filed the application before the ALC( C) .

It is also not disputed that Rajender Kumar motor lorry driver as work charge staff. On sustaining injury. Sh. Rajender Kumar was shifted on the post of Beldar on which he has become permanent also.

It is well settled w.e.f. 7-2-96 by virtue of coming into force of " Persons with Disabilities ( Equal Opportunities, Protection of rights and Full Participation ) Act, 1995 ( 1 of 1996) " that no establishment shall dispense with, or reduce in rank, an employee who acquires a disability during his service and in support of his case the worker has filed following case laws:

1. 2003 (4) Supreme Court cases 524 , Kunal Singh v. Union of india and another.

2. V-2003 (2) All India Services Law Journal 102 Delhi Transport Corporation V Rajbir Singh ; and

3. IV- 2003 ( i ) All India Services Law Journal 347 Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ganpat Singh .

The question remains whether this Tribunal can go beyond the issue referred to it ? 2001 ( 89) FLR 360 (Delhi High Court) Municipal Employees ' Union and another v. Secretary (Labour ) , Government of NCT of Delhi and another makes it clear that " it is well settled proposition that the Industrial Tibunal / Labour Court cannot travel; beyond the terms of Reference . " There is clear prohibition to the Tribunal in enlarging the scope of reference as has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court between Gouri Sankar Chatterjee and others and Texmaco Ltd. and others 2001 (89) FLR694 .

The learned representative of the worker has stated in the argument that the post of the worker cannot be altered accordingly to the para 11.02 of CPWD Manual Vol. III (Edition 1984 and 2000 ) and the worker could not have been put on light duty job where as the representative ofthe opposite party has stated that FRs and SRs are also applicable to the work charge staff and Ministry of Law has opined that work charged employees in the CPWD are CivilServants in terms of Article 311 of the Constitution. He has further argued that according to FR 15 the President may transfer a Government Servant from one post to [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

9019

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, vide its order No. L- 12012/ 166/2000- IR (B - II) dated 12-2-2001 referred the following dispute for adjudication to Presiding officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Lucknow:-

another provided that except , on account of inefficiency or misbehaviour, or on his written request. Further it provides that Government servant shall not be transferred to , or except in a case covered by Rule 49. In the present case the worker was put to light duty job and there was no illegality in the law. No other argument pressed into. On the discussions above I come to the conclusion that action of the management of CPWD in placing Sh . Rajender Kumar from Motor Lorry Driver Scale to Beldar Scale w.e.f. 25-11-1986 is perfectly legal and justified and in the circumstances the worker is not entitled to any relief as prayed.

Lucknow 1-7-2005

"WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, LUCKNOW IN NOT ALLOWING DUTY TO WORKMAN SRI PRAKASH NARAIN W.E.F. 16-3- 94 TREATING HIM TO HAVE VOLUNTARILY RETIRED FROM EMPLOYMENT IS LEGAL AND JUSTIFIED ? IF NOT, WHAT RELIEF THE WORKMAN IS ENTITLED TO? "

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2781.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 12012/166/2000- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 11th July, 2005

S.O. 2781. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 33/2001) ofthe Central Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 8-7-2005.

[No. L- 12012/166/2000 -IR (B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

Present: SHRIKANT SHUKLA Presiding Officer

IL.D. NO : 33/2001

Ref. No. L- 12012 / 166 /2000- IR (B- II) dated 12-2-2001 BETWEEN

The workmans case is that he was working as sub - staff at Faizabad Branch under the jurisdiction and control of the opposite party Central Bank of India , Regional Office, Lucknow. The workman fell ill and was under the medical treatment. During the said period, Fizabad branch sent letter to the workman to have treated the workman to have voluntarily cession from service . When the workman with the medical certificate , the workman presented himself to Faizabad branch and the opposite party they verbally refused to let join in service. Later on it was found that vide which letter the workman wastreated in the voluntarily cession in service , was signed below the rank of officer of appointing authority and he was not empowered to order for any punishment. The Branch Manager Fizabad sent a letter to CMO, Sultanpur to exmaine the health and medical certificate of the workman, who vide letter no . 1/96 dt. 16-5-96 recommended his leave for 13 months and 27 days on health grounds for these periods . The opposite party played a discriminative role as in case of Mrs. Bharti Srivastava , Clerk at Vivekanand Polycilinic Branch, Lucknow, her services have been kept continued though she is reported to have gone abroad since several years . The " voluntarily cession in service" clause actually applied for such staff who proceeds abroad and seek employment there without notice to the management but management shut their eyes in case of employees in whom they have interest . Hence the workman is entitled to be kept in continuous service of the bank treating the order of the opposite party is illegal and bad in law. Therefore the workman has requested that the answer of the reference may be given in negative and the workman may please be allowed to be on duty from 16-3-94 with benefits of increments , bonus and service and the punishment order of the opposite party "voluntarily cession in service " or to have voluntarily retired be quashed as the same is illelgal, arbitrary and bad in law and discriminatory.

Sh. Prakash Narain Tripathi GramDurgapur (Bhenwai Mauza) PostPeeperput , Sultanpur(U.P.)

AND

Central Bank of India, The Regional Manager, CBI , Regional Office 73 , Hazratganj , Lucknow (U.P. )

The oposite party has alleged that the worker joined the bank on 22-11-83 at Padrauna branch as Peon- cum Farash. On his own request, he was transferred to Faizabad branch on 28-12-87 . Later on , he was designated as Cash Peon on 27-11-99 and posted at B/ o Chowk Faizabad, where hejoined his duties on 12-12-90 . The worker was served a memo No. RO : PRS : 908 9715 dt . 1-12-90 for 9020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

unauthorised absence from duty for 303 days upto 21-11-90. For this misconduct , the worker was cautioned vide letter No. RO : PRS: 8:91 : 1107 dated 14-1-91 which was served upon him on 21-1-91 . Subsequently, the workman was transferred to Faizabad branch as Bill Collector. There also , he was again absent form duty from 1-11-92 to 1-2-93 (93 days ). The worker was again absent unauthorisedly from 23-4-93 to 22-9-93 , during this period three notices dt . 24-6-93 , 26-7-93 , 20-8-93 were issued by bank to the worker at his last recorded address for resumption of duty but the worker did not turn up and remained unauthorisedly absent . The worker was again absent unauthorisedly from 24-11-93 onwards and the bank advised the worker vide its letter dt. 12-2-94 to resume duties . The worker came on 16-3-94 with a medical certificate and requested Fizabad branch to allow him to join duty but he was directed to appear before CMO Sultanpur for medical examination/fitness . He came to Faizabad on 21-3-94 with CMO certificate and was then allowed to join duty. Due to his old habit , the worker left the branch again and was absent unauthorisedly from 5-5-94 and thus the worker was unauthorisedly absent from 966 days upto 28-7-94. Due to the above indisciplined behaviour of the worker and his unauthorised absence , the bank vide its letterdt . 15-11-94 treated the worker as voluntarily retired from Bank's service under para 17 of theBipartite Settlement. That the worker was in the habit ofabsenting right from the beginning of his service in the bankand never tried to mend himself despite opportunities givenby the bank from time to time. There is no violation ofany provisions of Bipartite Settlement and the worker's case is baseless , irrelevant, without any merit as such the same should be rejected outrightly.

The bank has also raised the objection that the worker has filed the claim belated and it is not industrial dispute as defined in section 2K ofthe I.D. Act , 1947.

The worker has filed rejoinder and has stated that so far as contents related to initial joining of service and histransfer upto Faizabad branch of the opposite party is concerned that is true and the rest matters are twisted and misrepresented and hence denied to the workman. In its further reply, it is submitted that the workman has not been ever on unauthorised absent but due informations were always given to the opposite party by telephone or by aplications and on finding the genuineness of the same , the opposite party allowed to join duty to the workman. So far as the allegation about habitual absence is concerned the worker has stated that sickness never comes with preinformaiton and it is also not in the control of human being who can avoid it and hence to be on leave on sick grounds due to illness can not be said to form habit as alleged by the opposite party. Treating misconduct the Sickness of a sick perosn and take punitive action for the same is barberous act of the opposity party as no person who is human in nature can behave like that . The worker has further alleged that he was allowed to join duty on 21-3-94 after taking medical certificate from CMO Sultanpur as said by the opposity party. As such there is no need to

[PART II SBC. 3 (1 ) ] explain the same. It is also alleged that no notice of Voluntarily Retirement from Service ' was received by the workman. The Faizabad branch of the opposite party vide their letter dt. 4-5-96 referred the case to CMO Sultanpur who recommended the period from 5-5-94 to 2-7-95 for sick leave on sick grounds even then the opposite party did not take the workman on duty. So far as the allegation ofthe oposite party in filing of claim is concerned that has beenreplied as irrelevant and without any merit .

The worker has filed photo copies ofthe following documents:

1. Photo copy of letter of Sri C.L. Sharma dt . 20-5-96 addressed to Regional officer , Lucknow paper No. 2/3.

2. Photo copy of letter of CMO dt . 16-5-96 addressed to Branch Manager, Central Bank ofIndia, branch Faizabad paper No. 2/4 .

3. Photo copy ofclause 17 ofBipartite Settlement voluntary cessation of employment by the workman paper No. 5/2 .

4. Photo copy of disciplinary action procedure ofCentral Bank of India paper no. 6/2 to 6/7 .

5. Photo copy of letter of Branch Manager addressedto Sri Prakash Narain Tripathi , Distt. Sultanpurdt . 31-10-94/ 13-11-94 paper No. 7/7 .

6. Photo copy of letter of Chief Manager Central Bank of India addressed to Regional Officer (PPS) dated 7-8-95 paper No. 7/14.

7. Photo copy ofdeath certificate of Sri Prakash Narain Tripathi paper No. 8/4.

Opposite party has filed photo copies of the following documents :

1. Photo copy of letter dt. 15-11-94 treating the worker has voluntary retired from the bank and para 17 of the Bipartite Settlement paper No. 11/2.

During the course of proceeding the worker Sri Prakash Narain Tripathi died on 17-6-02 his wife Smt. Prem Kumari moved an applicaiton praying that she should be allowed to be party on behalf of her husband and Tribunal may order the replace the name of Sri Prakash Narain Tripathi . The predecessor in office allowed the application on 15-9-02 . Smt. Prem Kumari filed an affidavit on 31-10-02 and she was cross examined on 9-5-03 . Opposite party however did not produce any witness .

Heard arguments of the parties & perused evidence on as record.

The worker has not disclosed the date of letter by which the workman was treated his voluntarily cession from the service . Worker has also not given details of periodwhich he was sick in the his statement ofclaim.

In the rejoinderdt . 21-11-90 worker has stated "Further leave without pay up to 9-11-90 has already closed 9021 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

as opposite party has already issued " Caution " to the workman vide letter dt. 14-1-1991 . "

Worker has not stated the date on which he was ceased from the service in bank nor he has mentioned the letter particular in the statement of claim.

"The only matter is from onwards , in which opposite party states that workman was absent from 1-11-92 to 1-2-93 i.e. for 93 days . Then the opposite party allowed himtojoin service. According to opposite party workman again absented from 24-8-93 to 22-9-93 . "

Areference has been made by the Govt . of India for adjudication of the issue " whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India , Lucknow in not allowing duty to the workman Sri Prakash Narain Tripathi w.e.f. 16-3-94 treating to have voluntary retired from employment is legal and justified. "

Worker ought to have alleged in the statement of claim that he was not allowed duty w.e.f 16-3-94 and he ought to have proved such allegations . He has merely prayed in the statement of claim that he may be allowed to duty on 16-3-94 . Wife of the worker Sri Prakash Narain Tripahi has specifically admitted in her cross examination that the worker did join the duty on 21-3-94 alongwith fitness . The statement of Smt. Prem Kumari wife of Sri Prakash Narain Tripathi as in the cross examination is reproduced below :

The point of dispute is that according to opposite party workman absented himself from duty from 24-11-93 , but actually he was sick but on receipt of the letter opposite party vide letter dated 12-2-94 the workman came to Faizabad branch to join duties on 16-3-94 with medical certificate but the branch officials & opposite party did not allow him to join duty. The opposite party's intention was to increase loss of pay, to show it unauthorisedly and to out him from service otherwise it is useless to count the same upto 966 till 28-7-94 . On one side, opposite party says that the workman was not allowed to join duty on the other side they say the worker again absented on 5-5-94 . "

प्र. 5: 16-3-94 को श्री प्रकाश नारायण त्रिपाठी मेडिकल प्रमाणपत्र के साथ डयूटी गये और उन्हें कहा गया कि वे सी.एम.ओ. के सामने मेडिकल फिटनेस/परीक्षण हेतु प्रस्तुत हो, सही है ।

उ.: सही है

यह सही है किदिनांक 21-3-94 को फिटनेस के साथ डयूटी ज्वाइन की।

थी । 5-5-94 से डयूटी इसलिये नहीं गये कि तबियत खराब हो गयी "Further more , if the workman was not treated in the employment of the bank, why Faizabad branch sent medical certificate of the workman to Chief Medical Officer , Sultanpur. On receipt of the report from Chief Medical Officer, Sultnapur vide letter dt. 16-5-96. The opposite party have not taken into cognigance and have not allowed duties to the workman . The photo copy of Branch letter dt. 20-6-96 & letter dated 16-5-96 by ChiefMedical Officer, Sultanpur to Faizabad branch of opposite party is enclosed for perusal. "

From the pleadings the admitted facts are:

1. Worker joined in the service of opposite party Bank on 22-1-83 as Peon-cum- Farrash.

2. On worker's own request he was transferred to Faizabad branch on 28-12-87 .

3. Worker was designated cash Peon & posted atbranch office, Chowk Faizabaddt . 12-12-90 .

Thus it is clear that service of Sri Prakash Narain Tripathi did not ceased on 16-3-94 instead he continued in service thereafter also w.e.f. 21-3-94 to 4-5-94 and he absented thereafter since 5-5-94. The document paperNo. 2/4 is photo copy of letter of ChiefMedical Officer in which probably the Chief Medical Officer has recommended the leave from 5-5-94 to 2-7-95 on the medical grounds . Worker has filed a letter dt. 31-10-94/13-11-94 No. 28/94-95/348 of BranchManager addressed to Sri Prakash Narain Tripathi informing him that according to Vth Bipartite Settlement chapter 17 para A worker has ceased the work . This letter is not at the point of reference. The issue before this court isnot that whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in not allowing the duty to workman w.e.f. 13-11-94 treating him to have voluntary retiredfrom employment.

4. Worker was served memo No. PRS : 90 : 8 : 9715 dated 1-12-90 for unauthorised absence from duty for 303 days upto 21-11-90. For this misconduct he was " Cautioned " vide letter No. PRS : 8:91 : 1107 dt. 14-1-91 which was served on him on 21-1-1991 .

5. Worker was transferred to Faizabad as Bill Collector there also he was absent from duty from 1-11-92 to 10-2-93 (93days).

6. Worker was again absent unauthorisedly from 23-4-93 to 22-9-93 .

7. Worker was again absent on 24-11-93 .

8. Worker was allowed to join duties on 21-3-94.

Onthe discussions above I come to the conclusion that the worker has neither pleaded nor proved that the management of Central Bank of India , Lucknow has not allowed him the duty w.e.f. 16-3-94 treating to have voluntary ceased from employment. On the other hand it is proved that the worker worked on 21-3-94 and afterwards and discontinued to come on duty on 5-5-94 onwards . The issue is accordingly answered in favour of the management and therefore under the present reference the worker is not entitled to any relief. 1-7-2005

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

Lucknow

9. Worker was absent unauthorisedly from 5-5-94.

2211GI/2005-40 9022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 12 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2782.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/ एलसी/आर/274/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

सं. एल.-41012/154/97- आई आर ( बी- I ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 12th July, 2005

S.O. 2782 - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R / 274 / 99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Railway and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 12-7-2005.

[No. L41012/154/97 - IR ( B- 1 ) ! AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/ 274/99

Presiding Officer : SHRI C. M. SINGH Shri Nilesh KumarGupta, S/ o Shri Shyam Sunder Gupta , 278, West Ghamapur, Near Krishna Colory. Jabalpur (MP)

Umon/Workman

Versus

The Divisional RailwayManager, CentralRailway, Jabalpur

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 6th day of July, 2005 The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. 1-41012/ 154/97 -IR (B - 1 ) dated 2nd August , 1999 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :

"Whether the action ofthe management ofthe Central Railway in terminating the services of Shri Nilesh Kuna? Capta, Ex. teniporary waterman we.f. 30-6-9 is legal and justified. Ifnot, inat relict he is entitled to and from which date ? "

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii)] 2. After the reference order was received, it was duls registered on 16-8-99 and notices were issued to the partics for filing their respective statements of claim . The workman has filed the statement of claim , mangement has filed written statement and thereafter the workman has filed rejoinder. The case was at the stage of filing documents . On5-7-05 , the date fixed in the reference Shri T.S. Thakur . Advocate , the learned counsel for the workman submitted that the reference be closed for No Dispute Award as the workman has no interest left in the reference . Shri B.K. Jaiswal , Law Assistant for the management submitted that behas no objection ifthe reference is closed for No Dispute Award. On the said date , the reference was closed . The above submissions made by the representatives of the parties clearly indicate that the parties have no interest in the reference. It further indicates that no dispute is left between the parties .

3. Under the above circumstances , No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .

4. Copy of the Award be sent to the Ministry of Labour as per rules .

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2783.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्दन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई डी-65/ 2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था!

[सं. एल.-41011/5/2001-आई आर ( बी-1 ) अंजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 12th July, 2005

S.O. 2783. - In pursuafice of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Ceniral Government hereby publishes the award ( I.D. - 65 / 2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court . Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation t the management of Northern Railway and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 12-7-2005.

[No. L-41011 /5/2001 - IR ( B -1 ) AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURD

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT,

LUCKNOW Present:

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1.D. No. 65/2001

Ref. No. L -41011/5/2001 /IR (B -I) Dt. 11-4-2001

Between

The Divisional Secretary,

Rail Mazdoor Union,

Northern Railway, Charbagh, Lucknow - 226001

AND

The Dy. Chief Engineer (Bridge)

NorthernRailway, BridgeWorkshop ,

Charbagh, Lucknow - 226001

AWARD

TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour referred the following dispute to Presiding Officer , CGIT- cum- Labour Court, Lucknow for adjudication:

"Whether the demand for regularisation of 69 workers mentioned in list by the mangement ofDy ChiefEngineer ( Bridge) , Northern Railway, Lockr is justificed ? If yes , what relief workmen an entitled?"

The trade union Rail Mazdoor Union, Northern Railway, Lucknow which shall hereinafter he referred as trade Union's case is that Ram Sumer and 68 others were appointed under the opposite party from date shown against their names in the enclosed list . They have completed 180 days continuous service as shown again them in Col. No. 6 of the list enclosed with the statement of claim. On completion of 180 days continuous service, all worker was entitled to be regularised by given them Temporary status and all benefits like fixation of pay seniority, pensionary benefits etc. As given to temporary Railway workers. Opposite party failed to regularise their services on the dates when completed 180 days continuous service . Workmen have been granted temporary status much after their due dates , as shown in column 7 of the list . Opposite party failed to make payments in favour of these workmen for the entervaning period . It has therefore been requested that this court may hold these persons entitled for regularisation after granting temporary status on completion of 180 days continuous service as shown in column 6 of the list alongwith all consequential benefits.

Opposite party has in his written statement alleged that Ram Sumer and 68 others were engaged as daily rated casual labours from time to time as per need of the Railway administration . The workmen worked with intermittent gap. The Railway Administration provided temporary status to all the workmen when they had completed 180 days continuous service . All the workmen were regularised and absorbed in the department after screening test and medical examination from time to time as per sanctioned strength

9023

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

and approval of the competent authority. Therefore the reference is bad in the eyes of law and claim is highly delayed without any explanation of delay.

Tradeunion raising the issue is not recognised union raised the stale claim after 30 years due to malafide intention. It is pointed out that the relief has been sought one for temporary status from artificial date and other for regularisation . As per Railway Rules temporary status to the casual labour is given after 120 days continuous service and regularisation of workmen as per sanctioned strength and prior approvai of the competent authority after screening test medical test for Group D post as Khalasi. Dates in the enclosed list ( statement of claim ) col No. 5 and 6 are artifical and without support of any documentary evidence . The opposite party has stated that Government has referred only issue whether the demand for regularisation of 69 workers (mentioned in the list) by the management of Dy. Chief Engineer (Bridge ) Northern Railway, Low is justified .

Workers are already regularised and therefore no dispute exista: all .

Sri Srivastava , Dy. Secretary of the Mazdoor Union he led the affidavit in respect of his case and has filed fol owing photo copies of the documents;

1. Photo copy of list of workmen Sri Ram Sumer and 68 others .

2. Photo copy ofprinted serial (P.S. ) No. 1731 - Circular No. 220 -E/ 190 - IV (Eiv. ) t. 31-8-62/ 1-9-62 circulated by Railway Administration .

3. Photo copy of Dy. Chief Engineer/Br/NQ/N -Rly. HQ Office Baroda House , New Delhi's letter No. 20E )dt. 2-7-92 .

4. Photo copy of Dy. Chief Engineer (Br . W) R - Rly, Lucknow's Letter No. 803 -E/5-4 ( RMU) 12 - Cdt . 11-12-98.

5. Photo copy of Dy. Chief Engineer ( Br. W) N -Rly, Lucknow's Letter No. 803 -E/5-4 (RMU) 12 - C dt . 22-12-99.

6. Photo copy of Dy. Chief Engineer (Br. W) N - Rly, Lucknow's 31-2-99 .

7. Photo copy of Dy . Chief Engineer (Br . W) N-RI Lucknow's Letter dt. 21-6-99 .

8. Photo copy of Dy. Chief Engineer ( Br . W) N - Rly, Lucknow's Letter dt . 22-6-99 .

9. Dy. CE/BR . HQ/NR HQ Office Baroda House , New Delhi's etter No. 961 - E/PNM/ NRM J/ CBE /Br.dt . 5-11-2001.

Opposite has filed the list of 69 workers who have been regularise . Sri S.N. Srivastava has examined himself 9024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

as witness and has also examined Sri Sita Ram whereas opposite party has examined Executive Engineer Sri Balbir Singh.

On 10-12-2003 the trade union representative was absent and the case was order to proceed ex-party against the trade union . In the circumstances heard the representative of the opposite party alone and carefully gone through the evidence on record.

The list of the worker for whose regularisation matter has been referred for adjudication;

Father's Name Worker's Name

Sl No.

Sri Ishwar Dayal Sri Ram Sumer

Sri AmritLal SriBhagat Ram 3.

Sri Ram Kishan Sri Ghassitey 4.

Sri Noor Mohd .

Sri JanMohd .

Sri Sri Ram

Sri Nokhe 6.

Sri Rewa Dutt Sri DevDutt

Sri Jahoor 7.

Sri Ahmed Hussain

Sri Gauri Shankar Sri Ayudhya Pd .

Sri Ram Avatar 9.

Sri Devata Deen

Sri Tulasi

10. SriFaquirey

Sri J. C. Talukdar 11.

SriNaresh Chandra

Sri Chandika 12.

Sri Ram Kishan

13.

Sri Pyare Lal Sri Rameshwar

14. Sri Rakesh Kumar Sri Bal Kishan 15. Sri ShyamLal Sri Sarajoo 16, Sri Sri Ram Sakhi Sri B. N. Singh 17.

Sri Ram Dularey Sri Raj Narayan

18.

Sri Data Deen Sri Patheshwari

Sri Late Gafoor Sri Rasak

19.

20. Sri Chhotey Lal Sri Nokhey 21. Sri Tahal Singh Sri Amar Singh 22. Sri Aloopi Singh Sri Tulasi Ram 23.

Sri Chaney SriMatayee

Sri Hari Ram 24. Sri ShyamLal

25. SriNanhey Sri Bhullayee 26.

Sri Chauhan SriPyam

27.

SriDuni

Sri Chiranji

Sri Chhiba 28 Sri Teja Ram

SriDuni

29. SriMangal

Prasad

30.

Sri Nain Singh Sri Pratap Singh

31.

Sri Raman Nair Sri A. M. Nair

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

Sri ChetRam Sri Ram Achhawar 32.

33.

Sri Hori Lal Singh Sri Lachman Singh

SriSitaram

SriMohan Lal

34.

35. Sri Chiranji Lal Sri Salig Rain 36. Sri Pooran Ram Sri Paragi

37. Purshottam SriMangal

38. Sri Jagir Singh Sri Teja Singh

Sri Chheda

Sri Putti Lal

39.

40.

Sri Ram Dayal Sri Radhey Shyam

41. Sri Chhotey Lal Sri Maikoo

SriRam Pal

42.

SriHirayee

43.

Sri Maikoo SriRoopen 44.

Sri Jagannath Sri Raja Ram

Sri Chakkal

45.

Sri Lalla

Sri Hori Lal

Sri Chibba

46.

47.

Sri Ram Avtar Sri Bhawan

Sri Sohan Lal 48.

SriLalji

SriBaboo Lal 49. SriLalla

Sri Mata Deen 50. SriDeenDayal

51.

Sri Ram Murat SriJaithoo

52. Sri Pritam Singh Sri Roda Singh 53. Sri DeotaDeen Sri Rameshwar

Sri Muna Lal 54. Sri Sat Prakash

Sri Ram Prasad 55.

Sri Sive Shankar

Sri Harbansh 56. Sri Sarjoo

57 .

Sri Ram Rattan Sri Santoo

58.

Sri Ram Bahadur Sri Puttoo

59.

Sti Janak Ram Sri Prabhu Dayal

Sri Inder Prasad 60. Sri Late Guru Dayal

61.

Sri Surain Singh Sri M. Mukh- vinder Singh

62.

Sri Kare Deen Sri Sooraj Prasad

SriBaboo Lal 63. Sri Bhagwati

Prasad

Sri Bhawan 64. Sri Mewa lal

65. Sri Radhey SriAjudhya Shyam

SriMaikoo

66. SriBipet

Sri Settal Prasad 67.

Rama Kant

Pandey

68.

Sri S. B. Singh Sri C. B. Singh

Sri Mehar Chand 69. SriBodhRaj भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Sri S. N. Srivastava has admitted that Sri Amrit Lal whose name is on Sl . No. 2 of the list is dead, the witness could not tell the date when he died . The witness has also admitted that Sri Gafoor whose name is at Sl . No. 19 is also dead. He could not tell when he died . The witness has also admitted Pritam Singh Sl . No. 52 is also dead but when he died he could not tell.

Witness has also admitted that the Naresh Chandra whose name is at Sl . No. 11 , Ram Sakhi Sl . No. 16 , Raj Narain whose name is on Sl . No. 17 and Pateshwar at Sl . No. 18, Chotey Lal whose name is on Sl . No. 20, Teja Ram whose name is on Sl . No. 28 and Duni whose name is on Sl . No. 27 , A. M. Nair whose name is on Sl. No. 31 , Maiku whose name is on Sl . No. 43 , Raja Ram whose name is on Sl. No. 44 and Ram Avtar whose name is on Sl No. 47, RamBahadur at Sl . No. 58 has also retired . It is also admitted by the witness of the worker that Gurdayal at Sl . No. 60 is dead . The worker's witness has also admitted that the worker Vipati whose name is on Sl . No. 66, Uma Kant Pandey at Sl . No. 67 and C.B. Singh at Sl. No. 68 have also retired. The witness could not tell to the court the day and month and year of the retired workers .

Sri S. N. Srivastava trade union witness has admitted in the cross examination that all workers have been regularised in the service.

In the present case the file of Asstt . Labour Commissioner (C ) , Lucknow No. LKO- 8 ( 1-46)/ 98-48 dt. 15-2-2000 was summoned . The ALC ( C) send its confidential report which is follows:

LKO- 8 ( 1-46)/98

CONFIDENTIAL REPORT PART: II The Divisional Secretary , Rail Mazdoor Union Northern Railway, Lucknow has raised a Industrial Dispute for regularisation of services in respect of Sri Ram Sumer, Khallasi and Mohan Lal , M.T. Driver and 67 others as per list Encls - 1 . They have completed 180 days service and as such acquired temporary status as such they are entitled for regularisation from the date as shown against their name .

In reply railway management vide letter dt . 20-1-2000 informed that they were taking steps for giving benefits of regularisation. In the last para the railway stated that the process will take additional six months . About eleven months have been passed but nothing conc has come up. It appears that railway management will not do any thing .

It is a fit case for reference to CGIT, Lucknow for adjudication of following schedule of Industrial Dispute :

"Whether the demand for regularisation of69 workers mentioned in the list were legal and justified ? Ifyes what relief workmen are entitled to? "

9025 Parties to the dispute are ;

1. TheDy. ChiefEngineer (Bridge), N. Rly. Bridge Workshop Charbagh, Lucknow.

2. TheDivl . Secretary, Rail Mazdoor Union, N. R. Charbagh, Lucknow.

Sd/-

S. K. SINHA, Asstt Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Lucknow The Asstt. Labour Commissioner ( C ) recommended the case for reference to CGIT as it was the opinion that the railway administration shall take steps for regularisation of the workers and ALC gave the opinion that the railway management will not anything , however, if the matter conducted at ALC ( C ) level the railway management regularised the services of the workers . Therefore , it can not be said that the demand of the trade union for regularisation of worker was not justified.

Sri S. N. Srivastava has also admitted that regularisation was known to him by the notice dated 22-2-99. The relevant question asked and answer given by Sri S. N. Srivastava at page 3 are produced below :

प्रश्न 2 : विनयमतीकरण के आदेश किस तारीख को हुए ?

उत्तर: 22-2-99 की सूचना के द्वारा यह पता चला था कि ये सभी कर्मचारी रेग्यूलर हो चुके हैं ।

प्रश्न 3 : आपको ज्ञान कब हुआ ?

उत्तर : समझौता वार्ता जब ALC( C ) के सामने 22-2-99 को हुई तब मुझे ज्ञान हुआ था ?

The order of the reference is dt . 11-4-2001 , meaning thereby the workers stood regularised in the services during concilation proceeding before Asstt . Labour Commissioner (C) as admitted by Sri S. N. Srivastava , Dy. Secretary, RailwayMazdoor Union , Lucknow. In the circumstances there ought to have been no reference order and also no recommendation for reference of adjudication to the CGIT, Lucknow. Award passed accordingly.

Lucknow 7-7-2005

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2784.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कोचीन पोर्ट ट्रस्ट एवं कोचीन स्टीमर एजेन्टस् एसोसिएशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , अर्नाकुलम के 9026

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकारको 13-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल. 35011 /12/2004- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

AWARD

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2784.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 5/ 2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Ernakulam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Cochin Port Trust and Cochin Steamer Agents Association and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 13-7-2005 .

[No. L-35012/ 10/2004-IR (B- 11) ]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM COCHIN

Present

SHRI N. RAJENDARAN : Presiding Officer

C.R. No. 5/2005

Between

The Secretary,

Cochin Port Labour Union

Wellingdon Island ,

Cochin-682003

And

1. The Chairman,

Cochin Port Trust, Wellingdon Island, Cochin-682003

2. The President ,

Cochin Steamer Agents Association , Indira Gandhi Road, Wellingdon Island , Cochin-683003.

Representations

( 1) Shri K. Anand : Advocate For Management ( 1) (2) Smt . Latha Krishnan:

(1) Shri K. Anand Advocates For Management ( 1 ) (2) Smt . Latha Krishnan

(1) Shri B. Hamsa,

General Secretary, Government of India , Ministry ofLabour, New Delhi by its Order No. L- 35011 / 12/2004 IR(B- II) dated 4-05-2005 . referred an issue for adjudication and the award in relation to a dispute arose between the employers in relation to the Management of Cochin Port Trust and Their Workman , who is represented by the General Secretary, Cochin Port Trust Union , Wellingdon Island, Cochin in the follwing way.

"Whether the denial of employment to the steamer Watchmen on Board Ships at Cochin Port Trust by the Management of Cochin Steamer Agent's Association , Wellingdon Island , Cochin is legal , proper and justified ? If not to what relief the workmen are entitled to" ?

Onreceipt of reference from the Central Government to this Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ernakulam , the said reference is registered as C.R. No. 5/2005 and notices issued to both sides . Management and Union accepted notice . On 23-6-2005 Managernent Party Nos . 1 and 2 entered appearance through their Counsel. For the Claimant Union , Mr. B. Hamsa , General Secretry of Cochin Port Labour Union, Willingdon Island. Cochin appeared in person before the Tribunal . The parties settled their dispute out of Tribunal at discussions during a conciliation meeting before Sri R.K. Panda , Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central) , Ernakulam. Parties filed joint Memo of settlement . Joint memo recorded and accepted.

The terms of settlement are :

(1 ) It is agreed by the management and the union that employment opportunity for Steamer Watchmen is not available at present in Cochin Port.

(2) In the event of employment opportunity arising withCochin Steamer Agents ' Association at any time in future for steamer watchmen or any similar category of workers, the parties agree that the workers covered under this settlement would be considered for employment by the management under existing norms .

(3) It is agreed that the 35 steamer watchmen will be deemed to have voluntarily left the service w.e.f. 1-9-2004 ,

(4) It is agreed by the management and the union that the management will pay a lump sum amount of Rs . 47,50,000 as total financial commitment for 35 steamer watchmen enrolled on 1-4-2003 .

Cochin Port Labour

Union

ForRespondent (5) The parties agreed that the above total compensation amount includes the actual payment already made as VRS compensation to 3 steamer watchmen already retired voluntarily prior to the date of this settlement .

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(6) The parties agreed that Rs . 3,000/- per head paid 32 steamer watchmen during the month ofJanuary, 2005 forms part of the compensation package.

(7) The parties agreed that the above total financial commitment after adjustments under Clauses ( 5) and ( 6 ) above will be equally distributed among 32 steamer watchmen as per the details in the list enclosed.

(8) It is agreed by the management that the payment of compensation will be disbured on 02-05-2005.

(9) It is agreed by both the management and the union that with this compensation payment The workers will be deemed to have received all their legal dues and they will not have any claim for any further terminal benefits or compensation, whatsoever .

(10) The parties agreed to implement the terms of settlement on or before 10-05-2005 and report compliance. In case no report is received , it will be deemed that the terms of settlement are fully implemented.

So on the above terms award is hereby passed.

N. RAJENDRAN, Presiding Officer Exhibit: 'Nil'

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2785.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./एल.सी/ आर. / 120/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 22012/182/2001--आई आर ( सी-11 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2785. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.CGIT/ LC/R/ 120/ 2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western Coalfied Limited and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 13-7-2005.

[No. L - 22012/ 182/2001 - IR (C - II) ]

N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

9027

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR.

No. CGIT/LC/R/ 120/2002

Presiding Officer : Shri C. M. Singh

The General Secretary,

B. K. K. M. S. (BMS ) ,

P.O. Parasia,

Union/Workman Chhindwara

Versus

The ChiefGeneralManager,

WCL, Kanhan Area,

P. O. Dungaria,

Management Chhindwara (MP)

AWARD

Passed on this 4th day of July , 2005 1. The Government of India , Ministry ofLabour, vide its Notification No. L- 22012/ 182/2001 - IR ( C - II ) dated 27-8-2002 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of WCL Tandsi Project of Kanhan Area, PO Dungaria, Distt . Chhindwara (MP ) in not regularising Shri Yoosuf Khan S/o Rustam Khan , General Mazdoor as Gr. III clerk w.e.f. 14-12-97 and difference of wages thereon from4-12-96 onwards is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

2.After the reference order was received, it was duly registered on 9-9-2002 and notices were issued to the parties, the reference was at the stage of filing statement of claim by the workman and the notices therefor was issued to the workman. On 21-4-05 , the management filed application along with original deed of settlement. It was takenfor verification on 28-6-05 . On 28-6-05 , the workman appeared in person . He did not oppose the application for taking the original settlenient on record. Therefore , the application was allowed. The original settlement deed was duly verifiedbefore me by the parties. I have very carefully gone through the terms of settlement which are as follows:--

It has been agreed by BKKMS (BMS ) Union to withdraw the CGIT case from the CGIT where the case is under reference and after regularization in clerical Gr. III the case will be settled fully and finally.

ΙΙ . It has been agreed that on the basis of promotion with immediate effect fitment will be done accordingly and it will be binding on both the parties to accept/Pay the basic salary calculated based on fitment as per company rule .

9028

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

Vrs.

III. This settlement shall not to be cited as a precedence in any other case or at any other time.

General Secretrary, Khan Shramik Congress , Ukhra, Burdwan.

REPRESENTATIVES :

None.

For the management:

IV. Neither the workman himself not concerned Union or any other Union shall raise any dispute regarding this claim in future , statutory or non -statutory, judicial or non -judicial .

For the union ( Workman) : None.

INDUSTRY: COAL.

The above terms of settlement are fair and legally justified. Therefore, the reference is awarded in terms of settlement without any order as to costs .

WEST BENGAL

STATE:

Dated the 03-06-2005 .

3. The copy of the award be sent to the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour as per rules.

AWARD

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई, 2005

In exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Govt . of India through the Ministry ofLabour vide its letter No. L- 22012 / 132/92 - IR ( C - II ) dated 22-8-1992 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal .

SCHEDULE

का. आ. 2786.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ई.सी.एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंधमें निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण असनसोल ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/1991 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 22012/132/92- आई आर ( सी- II) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management of Parasea 6& 7 Incline of M/s . ECL , P.O. Parasea, Dist . Burdwan in dismissing Sri Nak Goura Mason Mazdoor is justified? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled? "

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

After having received the order of the aforesaid reference summons through the registered post were sent to the respective parties who in compliance of the said suminons appeared through their representatives and filed their written statement in support of their respective claims.

S.O. 2786. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 33 / 1991) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court . Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of ECL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 13-7-2005.

[No. L-22012/ 132/92 -IR( C - II) ]

N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

i ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

From perusal ofthe record it transpires that the record was fixed for evidence , but the union left taking any step on its behalf since 16-9-02 . Fresh notices were issued to the union but to no effect . In spite of service of the notice and repeated adjournments the union did neither appear nor take any step on its behalf. The order-sheets of the record go to show that the union has got no interest and has left taking any step. So it is not proper and advisable to keep this old reference pending any more as no useful purpose is to be served. Accordingly it is hereby

ORDERED

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT: Shri Md. Sarfaraz Khan, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 33 of 1991

That let a " No Dispute Award" be and the same is passed . Send the copies of the award to the Ministry of Labour, Govt. of India for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed off.

PARTIES:

Md . SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer Agent, Parasea 6 & 7 Incline of ECL, Parasea, Burdwan 9029

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2787. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , ई . सी. एल . के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण आसनसोल ( संदर्भ संख्या 4/1996 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -22012/327 / 95- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2787. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 4/1996) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 13-7-2005.

[No. L- 22012/327/95 - IR ( C - II) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT ASANSOL

Present:

Shri Md . Sarfaraz Khan , Presiding Officer.

REFERENCE NO. 4 of 1996

Parties:

Agent , Amritnagar Colliery, Raniganj , Burdwan. Vs. Organising Secretary, Colliery Mazdoor Sabha (AITUC ) , West Asansol , (WestBengal) .

Representaties:

None.

For the Management :

None.

For the Union (workman)

Coal

Industry

State

West Bengal Date 9th June , 2005

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section ( 1 ) and Sub-section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L-22012 / ( 327 )/ 95/ IR ( C- II ) dated 31-1-1996 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Amritnagar Colliery under Kunustoria Area of ECL 2211GI/2005-41

in dismissing Sh. Kaleshwar Singh, Conveyor Khalasi w.e.f. 5/7-5-88 from the service is legal and justified? If not, what relief the concerned workman isentitled to ? "

After receipt of the order of the aforesaid reference from the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour, summons through registered post with A/D were sent to the respective parties and in compliance of the summons both the parties appeared through their representatives and filed their respective written statements in support of their case.

From perusal of the record it transpires that the record was fixed for hearing but no step was being taken from the side of the union since 23-4-2003 . Fresh registered notices were issued against both the parties , even then no regular step was taken by the side of the union. It further transpires from the record that on 5-4-2005 lawyers from both sides appeared and prayed for time which was allowed fixing next 9-6-2005 for final hearing . The record was taken up on the said fixed date. The learned lawyer for the union submitted that he does not want to proceed with the case as the union has got no interest to contest the reference , hence no dispute as prayed to be passed. The reference is old one andthe workman or the union does not take any interest . So it is not proper and advisable to keep the record pending any more.

Accordingly it is hereby

ORDERED

that let a 'no dispute award ' be and the same is passed. Send the copies of the award to the Ministry of Labour for information and needful .

MD. SARFARAZ KHAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2788. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, डब्ल्यू. आई. एच. जी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ ( संदर्भ संख्या 139/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-07-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-42012/90/ 2002- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवून, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2788.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 139/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, and their workman, received by the Central Government on 13-07-2005 .

[No. L-42012/90/2002 - IR (C- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer 9030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15, 1927

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM -LABOUR COURT AT LUCKNOW PRESENT :

Shrikant Shukla , Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 139/2002

Ref.No.: L-42012/90/2002- IR(C- II) dated 5-8-2002

Between

Smt . Manjeet Arora (Kataria) 209 , Dobhal Wala Dehradun

And

The Director

Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology 33 -C, General Mahadva Singh , Marg, Dehradun

AWARD

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide their order No.L- 42012 /90/2002 - IR ( C- II) dated: 5-8-2002 referred following issue for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , Lucknow.

"Whether the action of the management of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun interminating the services Smt . Manjeet Arora (Kataria) , Research Assistant w.e.f. 15-5-1997 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief she is entitled to ? "

The worker's case is that she was appointed as Research Assistant in the project " Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun ( NRDMS ) " vide memorandumNo. 103 / 1 / 95 /DST/EST/T( 4)/95 , dtd 17-1-96 in the scale of 1200-30-1560 -EB - 40-2040 in the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun . According to the said memo the project was up to 14-5-96 which was further extended vide order No. 103 /5/95 /DST/ 140 dtd . 3-6-96 upto 14-5-1997. However , the worker , Manjeet Arora (Kataria) has been working upto 10-12-97 and thereby she has completed more than 240 days work . She has further alleged that she was permitted to sign in attendance register upto 13-6-97 and thereafter attendance register was forcibly removed . The worker has also stated that the other employees of the project such as Dr. Bhagwat Sharma , Sr. A.K.L. Asthana , P.S. Negi and worker herself continued to work as per verbal order with the assurance either they will be adjusted (accommodated ) in the institute or they will be provided extension . All the above employees of the project were not paid wages after May, 97 and considering the fact thatthe Registrar, Shri G.R.K. Nair went to the Pauri and considering the fact the at Ministry has taken decision for extension of the project , the worker on 8-12-97, requested for the wages as they were not paid wages . In this regard the employers informed that the worker's employment was for the period upto 14-5-97 only. The worker has denied the fact that the duration of the work was up to 14-5-97 . Instead she said that the duration of employment for all employees was not till 14-5-97 . The

[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] institution ( employer ) accorded extension to all employees except the worker and the they were paid wages . But the worker was denied the extension and wages . However, the worker has been regularly visiting the office till 12-8-98 . She was forced to obtain no dues certificate to avoid any harassment from the side of institute . It is also alleged that the worker complained against Dr. Trilochan Singh, but Director did not replied instead Dr. Trilochan Singh and the institute started torturing her. It has been stated that all other employees of the project have been adjusted in the employment of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun , but the institution did not even inform the worker. According to the worker since the worker has been in the continuous service ofthe institute for more than 240 days , therefore she cannot be removed from service . The employer too have not complied with the provisions of Section 25 N ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In the rejoinder the worker has stated that the institute comes in the provision of industry. The worker has also stated that here employment in institute as temporary and not contractual .

Theworker has accordingly prayed that she should be reinstated with continuity of service and back wages together with damages .

The opposite party has filed its written statement and has denied that Wadia Institute , of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun is an industry. The opposite party has stated that is registered under Societies Registration Act , 1860 with Registrar of Societies , UP, vide registration No. 3073 dated 3-9-86. The aim and objectives , for which the institute has been set up have been laid down in the Memorandum of Association , and inter alia are as under:

(a) To undertake , aid, promote , guide and co- ordinate research in geology of the Himalayas and foster a tradition of scholarship;

(b) To carry out research toward the development of new concept and models concerning earth structures and process operating in the Himalayas , through an integrated interdisciplinary approach;

(c) To provide and promote effective linkages on a continuing basis between various scientific and research agencies/laboratories and other organisations working in the country in the filed of Himalayan Geology and related areas;

(d) To receive grants - in - aid in cash or in other forms, from the Government of India , State Governments , Charitable Institutions /Trusts , individals and industry within the country.

The opposite party has Hundred per cent of funding to the institute is by way ofgrants - in - aid received from Government of India . This institute is a pioneer research institution in the area and filed of Himalayan Geology, which is a part and parcel of larger earth sciences . This is the only institution in the world exclusively devoted to research work in Himalayan Geology. This institute is not engaged in any activity, which can be called business , trade or manufacture . Neither from the nature of its organisation nor from the 9031 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Department of Science and Technology, Govt . of India, the tenure of extended upto 14-5-97 on the existing terms and conditions as mentioned in original memorandum dated 17-1-96 . Accordingly, on 14-5-97 , the tenure of engagement of the applicant automatically came to an end in accordance with and as per the terms of contractual appointment order. Accordingly, the services of the worker was never required , and also in fact she did not discharge any work/ duties after 14-5-97 , as her contractual engagement expired/came to an end on 14-5-97 and was not renewed further . The termination of the service of the applicant as a result of the non - renewal ofthe contract of employment/engagement on its expiry on 14-5-97 or also on accordance with the stipulation contained in the order of engagement does not amount to retrenchment , by virtue of the provisions contained in clause (bb) of Section (2) ( oo) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The opposite party has stated that the worker's allegation th... che marked attendance even after 14-5-97 and upto 13-6-97 is totally false and mischievous contention because she was never directed or asked to work beyond 14-5-97. Therefore , the marking of her attendance ever after 14-5-97 was purely of her own will and volition and was purely and totally done as an act of mischief an | with ulterior motives and fraudulent intentions . Also, she was not paid any remuneration beyond 14-5-97 , being not entitled to receive the same . Althouga vide order dated 25-3-98 the duration of particular project were very belatedly extended from 14-5-97 upto 15-5-98 , by the Department of Science and Technology, but the applicant was not issued any extension in services, because her services as a Research Assistant for doing computer related works were not required. It is relevant to highlight that the extension of project was done vide order dated 25-3-98 , but was only upto 15-5-98 and therefore for a period much less than two months there was no need or requirement of again calling here in service or renewing the contract of engagement of the applicant . After 15-5-98 , the said project was completely closed . The services of worker was terminated w.e.f. 14-5-97 , not renewed after 14-5-97, whereas her application dated 10-10-2001 moved before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C ) -cum- Conciliation Officer had been made , after an unreasonable, inordinate and unexplained delay of nearly 4-1/2 years . Hence on ground of delay and latches, the order of reference dated 5-8-2002 under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 is liable for outright rejection and dismissal . Regarding completion of more than 240 days of continuous service , the opposite party has stated thatin case of contractual engagements the number of days of service put in, legally becomes totally irrelevant and immaterial . It is also denied that any assurance of accommodation or extension was ever given . The opposite party has denied that the worker continued to come to office till 12-8-98 , because she was never called after 14-5-97 , as her cor tract was not renewed thereafter. It is also stated that worker's contention that she went to office till 12-8-98 is totally incorrect and not backed by facts of truth. In this regard opposite party has stated that the nature and character of the activity carried on by it, it can be said, to be an undertaking analogous to business or trade. It is not engaged in a commercial , industrial activity and it cannot be described as an economic venture or a commercial enterprise as it is not its object to produce and distribute services which would satisfy wants and needs of the consumer community. It is more an institution discharging governmental functions and is a domestic enterprise rather than a commercial enterprise. This institution is not an industry even though it is carrying on the activity of research in a systematic manner with the help of its employees as it lacks that element which would make it an organization carrying on an activity which can be said to be analogous to the carrying on of a trade or business because it is not producing and distributing services which are intended or meant for satisfying human wants and needs , as ordinarily understood. The opposite party institute therefore does not fall within the definition of theterm ' Industry' as defined under Section 2 (j ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In the circumstances the order of reference order dated 5-8-2002 and the subsequent applicant's claim application dated nil , are not legally maintainable and are not sustainable . It is in these circumstances that the opposite party is not an 'Industry' hence the institute is not amendable to the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and accordingly the order of reference under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is not maintainable . Further it is stated by the opposite party that this Tribunal lacks jurisdiction in the matter. The opposite party has stated that in the reference order dated 5-8-2002 as well asinthe corrigendum dated 17-9-2002 to the reference order, the only opposite party named therein is " The Director , Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33 - C, General Mahadev Singh Marg , Dehra Dun " whereas in her statement of claim, the applicant has on her own and totally in an illegal and unjustified manner has named the Registrar and the P.I. by personal names as additional parties. The same act of the worker is totally mischievous , unjustified and illegal being against the terms of the reference . The services of the worker were engaged as a Research Assistant against a particular Government of India, Department of Science and Technology Sponsored Research Project entitled 'Operationalisation of Geographical information System for Micro Level Planning in Pauri Garhwal District UP' . The engagement of the worker was purely on temporary basis and was tenable maximum upto the tenure of the said project , which was initially upto 14 May, 1996. The engagement commenced vide institute's memorandum No. 103/ 1/95/ DST/ Estt. ( 4 ) / 95 dtd . 17-1-1996 . The appointment memorandum vide clause No. 4 specifically mentioned an laid down the provision that appointment could be terminated at any time without assigning any reason or any prior notice or payment of any salary in lieu thereof. Appointment memorandum and signed a copy thereof in token of acceptance of terms and conditions mentioned therein and accordingly she submitted joining report dated 17-1-96 . Thereafter, upon the extension of the said project by the sponsoring agency i.e.

9032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6, 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

worker vide her letter dated 12-8-98 had stated that she worked till 10-12-97 under the particular project only. Regarding allegations raised against the Director as well as the P.I. the opposite party has stated that they are ill motivated with ulterior intentions and as an after thought.. The worker has failed to specify as to which otherpersons working in the project have been absorbed inthe services of the institute . Assuming that the worker is claiming treatment at par with Scientists working in the project, who have been regularised, then she cannot claim regularisation at par with them because those Scientists had put in very long tenure of service i.e. much more than 15 years of service whereas the worker worked for less than 1-1 /2 year and that also on purely contractual basis of fixed period . The worker was not entitled to any notice or for being provided any reason for termination because she was in knowledge of the fact that her tenure of engagement was only upto 14-5-97 as communicated to here vide extension order dated 3-6-96. The opposite party has therefore , requested that worker is not entitled to any relief against the institute under the present proceedings .

The worker has filed following photocopy of the documents:

1. Copy of onder of the High Court , Allahabad in Civil Misc . Writ Petition No. 18965 of 1995.

2. Letter No. ES/ 11/209/95 dated 17-10-1990 addressed to Dr. V.C. Thakur, Director , Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun.

3. Memorandum No. 33 / 1/80 -Estt . /524 dated4-1-2001 ofWadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun .

4. Order No. 18/242/97-Estt./218 dtd. 30-6-2000 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun.

5. Order No. 103 / 1 /95/ DST/Estt . Dtd. 5-5-1999 ofWadia Insitute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun .

6. Order No. 18 / 159/87-Estt ./ 27 dtd . 20-4-99 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun.

7. OrderNo. 18/159/87-Estt./333 dtd. 10-12-98 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun .

8. Office Memorandum No. 103/3 / 95 /DST /Estt . /4227 dtd. 7-1-99 ofWadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun

9. No dues certificate in respect ofManjeet Kaur Kataria.

10. No dues certificate in respect of Manjeet Kaur Kataria dtd. 11-8-98 .

11. No dues certificate in respect ofManjeet Kaur Kataria. 12. Receipt No. 54 dtd . 12-8-98 for Rs . 35 /-of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun .

13. Marriage card of Manjeet Kataria on 14-8-1998 .

14. Due-drawn table of wages ofP.S. Negi , Dr. Bhagwat Sharma, Dr. A.K. Asthana.

15. Due -drawn table ofwages of Dr. Bhagwat Sharma.

16. Due- drawn table of wages of P.S. Negi , Dr. Bhagwat Sharma , Dr. A.K. Asthana and Manjeet Kaur paper No. 20 to 22 .

17. Photocopy of note sheet with letter to the Registrar by Trilochan Singh.

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] 18. Representation of worker for redressal for grievances- release of salary etc. dtd. 15-4-1998 .

19. Letter No. 103 /1 /95 -DST/Estt ./3787 dtd . 6-2-1998 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun addressed to the worker .

20. Letter of worker addressed to the Director , Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun dtd. 2-2-98.

21. Order No. ES/ 11 /209/95 dtd . 25-3-1998 of Deptt. of Science & Technology.

22. Letter of Registrar, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun addressed to the worker.

23. Letter of the worker to the Director, Wadia Institute ofHimalayanGeology, Dehradun for release of salary dtd. 8-12-97.

24. Movement order No. 33 /3/90 -Estt . Dtd. 25-11-1997 ofWadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun.

Data of NRMMS/GIS Project Staff. 25.

26. Letter of the worker to the Director, Wadia Institute ofHimalayan Geology, Dehradun dtd. 8-7-1997.

27., Memorandum No. 18 / 135/85 -Estt ./89 dtd . 3-7-97 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun .

28. Photo copy of attendance register, paper No. 37 to 40.

29. Circular No. 18/ 133 / 86 -Estt . Dtd. 7-4-97 of Wadia Institute ofHimalayan Geology, Dehradun.

30. Order No. 103 / 5 / 95 /DST/Estt . Dtd. 20-3-1997 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun .

31. Order No. 103 /5 / 95/ DST/ 140 dtd. 3-6-1996 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun .

32. Order No. 103/ 5 /95 /DST/Estt . Dtd. 22-1-1996 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun.

33. Office memorandum dtd. 25-10-98 addressed to Sh. A.K. Lal Asthana, Senior Research Fellow, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology , Dehradun .

34. Memorandum No. 109/ 1 /95 /DST /EST ( 1 ) /485 dtd. 15-5-95 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun.

35. Memorandum No. 103 / 1 / 95 /DST/Estt . (4) /95 dtd . 17-1-96 of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun.

Wadia Institute ofHimalayan Geology, Dehradun has filed photocopies of the following documents :

1. Photocopy of renewal of registration under Society Registration Act, 1860 .

2. Constitution booklet of Wadia Institute ofHimalayan Geology, Dehradun incorporating therein the memorandum of association .

3. Sanction order No. ES/ 11/209 /95 dtd . 21-4-95 for implementation of project entitled 'Operationalisation ofGeographical Information System for Micro Level Planning in Pauri Garhwal District UP' .

4. Worker's application dt . 15-10-95 for the post of Research Assistant .

9033

अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

भारत का राजपत्र

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

volumes and amount received towards laboratory testing charges .

5. Memorandum (of offer of appointment ) No. 103/1/ 95/DST/Estt ./(4 )/95 dt. 17-1-96 .

6. Acceptance and joining reportdt . 17-1-96 of applicant.

7. Order No. 103/5/ 95 /DST/Estt. dt. 22-1--96.

4. Statement showing details of receipts and expenditure highlighting therein that the amount received from sale ofthe Himalayan Geology volumes is negligible vis- a-vis the grant - in - aid as well as the expenditure .

8. Extension order No. 140 dt . 3-6-96 .

9. Sanction order No. ES/ 11/209/95 dt. 27-8-96.

10. Sanction order No. ES/ 11 /209/95 dt . 10-2-97 .

5. Attested true copy of the relevant page No. 47 of the Report of the Review Committee constituted by the Government of India in the year 1997 for the review of the activities and performance of the institute in theyear 1997.

11. Attendance register for the months of May 97 and June 97 .

12. Instt.'s letter No. 3078 dtd. 10-12-97.

6. Attested true copy of the report ( in 12 pages ) of the PeerReview Committee constituted by the Govt . of India in the year 2002 .

13. Workers letter dtd . 8-12-97 containing noting ofPI of Project.

The worker has examined herself as witness No. 1 and also examined Dr. Bhawat Sharma .

14. Order No. ES/ 11 /209 /95 of Deptt. of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Govt. of India dtd . 25-3-1998 .

The opposite party has examined Dr. Trilochan Singh, MW- 1 and Dr. N.S. Birdi , MW- 2 . No other witness has been examined.

15. Noting dated 6-4-98 of Dr. Trilochan Singh, PI of concerned project .

16. Worker's letter dtd. 12-8-98 .

Heard, learned representatives of the parties and perused the evidence on record .

17. Instt.'s Office memorandum No. 4227 dtd. 6-6-99 .

18. Certificate dtd. 13-3-2001 given to worker byOP.

First ofall the issue, cropped up in the case is whether the opposite party i.e. Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun is an industry or not?

19. Worker's letter dtd. 10-9-2001 .

20. Instt's reply/letter No. 5372 dtd. 24-9-2001.

21. Statement showing details of staff (Scientist) working in the DST Project NEDMS/GIS.

22. Memorandum No. 33 / 1 /80/Estt ./524 dtd . 4-1-2001 in respect of absorption of Scientists of erstwhile DST sponsored NRDMS Project .

23. Judgement dated 10-8-2000 of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc . Writ Petition No. 14304 of 1995.

24. Award dated 4-12-2000 of Hon'ble Labour Court , Dehradun in adj . Cases Nos . 64/91 to 68/91 .

25. Order dtd. 22-2-95 of Hon'ble Supreme Court in writ Petition No. 756/91 in the matter ofDr. Arvind Rai Vs. Union of India.

26. Order dtd . 7-4-97 in Civil Appeal No. 2888 of 1997 as decidedby Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Jawahar Lal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur (MP) VS. Balkrishan Soni & others.

The opposite party has also filed photocopy of following documents:

The opposite party has argued that the Institute is not engaged in any activity, which can be called business trade or manufacture . Neither from the nature of organisation nor from the nature & character of the activity carried on by it , it can be said, be undertaking analogous to business or trade . It is not engaged in the commercial, industrial activity and it can not be described as an economic venture a commercial enterprise as it is not its object to produce & distribute services which would satisfy wants &needs ofconsumer community. It is more an institution discharging government functions and is a domestic enterprise rather than commercial enterprise . Institution is not an industry even though it is carrying on the activity of research in a systematic manner with the help of employees as it lack the element of which would make it an organisation carrying on an activity which can be said to be analogous the carrying of trade business because its not producing and distributing services which are intended ameant for satisfying human wants & needs , as ordenarily understood. The opposite party therefore does not fall within the terms ' Industry' as defined in section 2 ( s ) of the I.D. Act, 1947. In the circumstances the reference order of the government in itself & subsequent claim statement is not maintainable.

1. Attested copy of invoice No. 1319 dtd . 25-3-2003 from M /s . Shiva Offset Press Dehradun for Rs . 58,028/- towards the cost of 300 copies of Himalayan Geology Vol . No. 24 (1 ) for the year 2003 ,

Theworker in his argument has stated that research institutes are well within the definition of the industry as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2000 FLR Page 450 Nehru Weakkindra vs Union of India.

2. Attested copy of invoice No. 200 dated 7-10-2003 from M/s . Shiva Offset Press , Dehradun for Rs . 49,486/- towards the cost of 300 copies and 50 Reprints ofHimalayan Geology volume No. 24 (2 ) for the year 2003.

The opposite party has referred 2001 ( 89 ) FLR 323 Supreme Court between State of Gujrat & others & Pratam Singh Narsingh Parmar has argued that Department ofthe Government can not be held to be an industry and rather it is part of sovereign function . The case belonged to Forest Department in the State of Gujarat & respondent 3. Combined statement- showing details of amounts received by the Instt. by sale of Himalayan Geology 9034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15 , 1927

was appointed as a clerk. There in the appointment was governed by a set rules framed under proviso to Article 309 of Constitution of India, but in the present case opposite party is not the Department of Government . Therefore the said case law is not applicable in the circumstances of the present case.

Opposite party has also cited the case law Physical Research Laboratory vs K.G. Sharma 1997 ( II) LLJ 625 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court . In the said case it was nobody's case that Physical Research Laboratory is engaged in an activity which can be called business trade or manufacture . It was more an institution discharging government function & a domestic enterprise than a commercial enterprise . In the said case Hon'ble Supreme Court observed the purpose of research is to acquire knowledge about the formation & evolution of the universe but the knowledge thus acquired not intended to sale .

On the other hand worker has come out with the argument that the opposite party is engaged in business & has offered for sale its analytical ability to the private industries which are double in rates in comparison to the R &Djob research projects . It is also argued that the opposite party institute is also providing Consultancy & Advisory Services . Worker has filed the documents 39/18 & 39/23 . Worker has also relied on Bangalore Water Supply & SewerageBoard case ( 1978 ) 2SCC 213 .

I have carefully perused evidence on record . It is admitted fact that the opposite party is engaged in the activity of research in systematic manner with the active cooperation of its employees and when the services are offered to be sold to private industries then such institute acquire the nature of an Industry. The opposite party is therefore an industry. The reference order is therefore not bad in law.

Coming to the order of reference which requires to be adjudicated which is for repeation sake reproduced below:

"Whether the action of the management of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun in terminating the services of Smt. Manjeet Arora (Kataria) Research Assistant w.e.f. 15-5-97 is legal andjustified? Ifnot, to what relief she is entitled to?" .

This Court has to adjudicate whether the action of the management was legal and justified.

Smt . Manjeet Arora has stated in answer to the question of the Presiding Officer that her services were terminated on 10-12-97 . Her relevant statement is reproduced below

" मेरा termination नहीं हुआ है । खुद कहा termination लेटर नहीं मिला खुद कहा कि termination मैं नहीं मानती । फिर कहा termination है । मेरी सेवायें 10-12-97 को समाप्त की गई थी । मेरी सेवायें अवैधानिक रूप से समाप्त कर दी । " Further at page no . 3 she stated that she continued going for work till 12-8-98 & her attendance was also marked till 13-6-97. Relevant extract of her statement is produced below:

14-5-97 के बाद 12-8-98 तक जाती रही व 13-6-97 तक मेरी attendance , attendance रजिस्टर पर ली है व नीचे

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] सबके Counter Sign है । यह attendance register नित्य verify करते थे । इस बीच मुझसे काम लेते रहे , मेरे को 14-5-97 तक की Salary दी गई है । मुझसे 8-12-97 को No dues की demand की, 12-8-98 को मुझे देना पड़ाइस बीच में work करती रही। "

Thus according to the reference order the case has been referred for adjudication as to whether the action of the terminating the services of the worker Smt. Manjeet Arora (Kataria ) w.e.f. 15-5-97 is legal or justified, but the worker suggested 4 dates regarding the period till which she performed the duties.

Ist 13-6-97 (Last date on which she signed the attendance register)

Ind 08-12-97 (the date on which No Dues statement was demanded)

IIrd 10-12-97 (when at page 2 of her statement she stated that she was terminated on 12-12-97)

IVth 12-8-98 ( when she stated that she was compelled to give no dues certificate & in the meantime she continued work .) Opposite party wanted to know the last date of her working suggesting all dates above . Worker replied that she worked till 12-8-98.

Opposite party specifically wanted to know by suggesting

की गई । प्रश्न: इसका मतलब 14-5-97 को आपकी सेवायें समाप्त नहीं उत्तर: 14-5-97 को मेरी सेवायें समाप्त नहीं की गई न कोई extension दिया गया Termination Letter दिया गया । The learned representative of the opposite party has argued that the court has to confine its adjudication to the matter as described in the order of reference alone & it cannot of its own decide the validity of the termination of services w.e.f. any other date as the worker has tried to state in examination in chief or cross examination . He has further argued that reference is for limited question whether the termination order w.e.f. 15-5-97 is legal & justified. This court therefore no jurisdiction behind the fact as to when the worker stopped working or other allied matter . Opposite party has based his argument on following case laws;

1. 1979 (38) FLR 38 ( FB Supreme Court) Between Poltery Mazdoor Panchyat & the Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd.

2. 2001 ( 89 ) FLR 360 (Delhi High Court) Between Municipal Employee Union & another & Secretary Labour , Govt. of NCT of Delhi & another .

3. 2001 ( 89 ) FLR 694 ( Supreme Court ) Between Gauri ShankarChatterjee & others and TAXMACO & others .

4. 1981 (43 ) FLR 258 (F. B. Supreme Court) Between Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India Pvt . Ltd. and workman.

5. 2000 ( 89 ) FLR 345 ( Rajasthan High Court , Jodhpur) Between the State and Lala & others .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6. 2000 (87) FLR 629 (Madhya Pradesh High Court) Between Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti , Damoh &Presiding Officer, Labour Court Sagar & another.

7. 2000 (98) FLR 623 (Orissa High Court) Between Umakant Patnayak & others and Management Gaiety Cinema & others.

8. 2001 (89 ) FLR 458 Karnataka High Court Between Prakash & others and Supdt. Engineer (ELEL ) & others.

9. 2004 Supreme Court Cases (L&S ) 798 Mukund Ltd. Vs. Mukund Staff & Officers Association.

Case laws referred by the opposite party clearly lays down the following principle of law.

"The Industrial Tribunal/Labour court can not travel beyond the terms of reference . Tribunal can not enlarge the scope of reference . Tribunal derives jurisdiction from theterms of reference , therefore the terms of reference can notbe enlarged . '

Hon'ble Delhi High Court while deciding the case betweenModern Food Industries ( India Ltd. ) and Govt . of NCT ofDelhi [2000 (85) FLR 493 ] observed that where the reference was " whether the punishment of down grading ofSri S.P. Bhargwa is disproportionate? If so to what relief is he entitled & what directions are necessary in this behalf' , the tribunal passing an award that punishment of down grading imposed upon the worker was held to be neither justified nor legal and accordingly he set aside the award where as the dispute as to whether the punishment was legal or valid was not referred . Hon'ble court further observed that it is accepted principle of law that the Industrial Tribunal has to confine the adjudication within the terms of reference . He derives jurisdiction from terms ofreference & therefore , the scope of reference can not be enlarged.

In another case where the reference was " क्या अधिशासी अभियन्ता सार्वजनिक निर्माण विभाग ( भवन एवं पथ ) बासवाड़ा द्वारा उनके श्रमिक लाला पुत्र श्री दितिया मेठ निवासी गांव करतपुर पोस्ट रूरेड़ी तहसील गढ़ी जिला बासवाड़ा को सेवा मुक्त करना उचित एवं वैध है ?है ? यदि नहीं तो श्रमिक किस राहत को पाने का अधिकारी है । "

The labour court made the award declaring the workman semi permanent & permanent and further directing to fix him in the pay scale payable at the relevant time & also to pay arrears with cost at the rate of 12% p.m. Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan Jodhpur [ (2000 (89 ) FLR 345 ] between the State & Lala & others , ruled that no industrial dispute was raised with respect to declaring the respondent workman semi permanent & permanent . There was no reference calling upon the labour court to answer with respect to giving status of semi permanent or permanent to the respondent workman . The labour court has exceded the jurisdiction making declaration about the status of respondent workman .

Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court , between Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Damoh & Presiding Officer, Labour Court , Sagar & another [2000 ( 87 ) FLR629 ] has ruled "Dispute referred was only as to whether the termination from service was legal and justified . The Labour

9035

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6 , 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

Court therefore, clearly traversed beyond the scope of reference. In directing payment of wages in regular scale" .

Hon'ble Karnataka High Court between Prakash & Others and Supdt. Engineer (ELEL) & others [2001 (89 ) FLR458 ] has laid down that " The matter is well settled that ifan individual raises a dispute it can only be for removal termination or dismissal . If the workman wants to raise a dispute with regard to absorption & regularisation that can only be done by union which can raise the dispute on behalf of the workman or workmen" .

On going through the entire case laws , I come to the conclusion that this court has only to answer whether the termination ofthe worker w.e.f. 15-5-97 is legal or justified. It can not enlarge the scope of reference or can travell beyond the order of reference .

Admitted facts are that the Registrar of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology Dehradun issued the following appointment memorandum to Miss Manjeet Kaur;

No. 103 /1 /95 /DST/Estt . ( 4)/95

Dated 17-1-96 MEMORANDUM

With reference to her applicationdt . 15-10-95 and on the recommendation of the Selection Committee meeting held on 11-1-96, the Director, Wadia Institute ofHimalayan Geology has been pleased to offer Miss Manjeet Kaur, the postofResearch Assistant on a basic ofRs . 1290/-p.m . in the pay scale of Rs . 1200-30-1560- EB - 40-2040 plus other allowances as per rules in the Govt. of India , Department of Science & Technology, sponsored Research Project entitled "Operationalisation of Geographical Information System for Micro level planning in Pauri - Garhwal District U.P. " under the supervision of Dr. Trilochan Singh Scientists "E- I ", WIHG.

2. The appointment is purely on temporary basis and tenable maximum upto the tenure of the Project which is atpresent upto May 14, 1996 .

3. She will be subjected to administrative control of the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology. Dehradun (for TA/DA, Leave etc. ) but she shall not be treated as the employee of the Institute . By virtue of this assignment she will not be entitled to claim any lien for appointment in any other posts in the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology. No administrative or other liability will be attached to the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology or the Deptt. of Science & Technology, Govt . of India at the end of the project.

4. The appointment can be terminated at any time without assigning any reason or any prior notice ofpayment ofany salary in lieu of prior notice .

5. She will be governed by the terms and conditions ofthe project from time to time .

6. She will produce a medical certificate of fitness from a Medical Officer not below the rank of Civil Surgeon of a Govt . Hospital :

7. If any declaration given or information furnished by the candidate proves to be false or if the candidate is 9036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15 , 1927

found to have wilfully suppressed any material information she will be liable to removal from service and such other action as Institute may deem necessary.

8. She can be posted at Pauri -Garhwal as and when necessary.

9. Ifwilling to accept the above terms and conditions of appointment , she may report for duty on or before 30-1-96.

Sd/- (G. R. K. NAIR)

REGISTRAR Theterms of appointment could be summarised as under;

1. She was appointed as Research Assistani on the basic of Rs . 1290/ - p.m. in the pay scale of Rs . 1200-30-1560-EB - 40-2040 + other allowances as per rules.

2. Appointment was for specific project Operationalisation of Gepgraphical Information system for Micro level planning in Pauri-Garhwal District U.P. under the supervision of Dr. Trilochan Singh, Scientist E - 1 WIHG.

3. Appointment was purely temporary basis and tenable maximum upto the tenure of the project which is at present uptoMay 14, 1996 .

4. Appointee shall not be treated as employee of the Institute, nor she will be entitled to claim any lien for appointment or any other posts in the Institute .

5. Appointment could be terminated at any time without assigning any reasons or prior notice of payment ofany salary in lieu of prior notice.

6. Appointment shall be governed by the terms and conditions of the project from time to time.

7. If appointee is willing to accept the terms and conditions, she may report for duty or on before 3-1-1996 .

From bare reading of the appointment memorandum it is clearly made out that the contract of appointment is for a fixedterm initially it was upto 14th May, 1996 with clear stipulation that appointment could be terminated at any time without assigning any reason or prior notice . It was also made clear that she shall not be treated as an employee ofthe institute nor she will be entitled to claim any lien for appointment on any posts in the institute . It is therefore believed that the worker joined the services in the project knowing fully well that by virtue of this appointment she can not claim regularisation .

She has in evidence stated that her appointment was not on contract basis , instead it was till the completion of the project, although she has admitted that the appointment was upto 14-5-96 which was extended upto 14-5-97 . She has named Dr. Bhagwat Sharma , Dr. S.K.L. Asthana and G.S. Negi were working in the project from the very beginning . She has also stated that their services conditions were also the same as that of his . In an question to the court, she has stated that she was not provided

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] extension although her attendance was taken upto 13-6-97 . At page no. 5 of the evidence she has stated that barring her all others have been merged in the institute . One has alleged that it was Trilochan Singh who due to annoyance on 9-7-97 gave his report , so that she may not get extension in the service .

Smt . Manjeet Arora has admitted in the cross examination that the GIS project started in May 95 and Sri Trilochan Singh was Principal Investigator-she worked under him . She has also admitted that the completion report of the project is sent under the supervision of Project Investigator. She has also admitted that according to extension letter dt. 3-6-96 has last working day was 14-5-97.

No. 103/5/95/DST/140

Dt. 3-6-1996

ORDER

Consequent upon the extension of the DST sponsored Research Project entitled " Operationalisation of Geographical Informations System for Micro Level Planning Pauri Garhwal U.P. " vide D.S.T. letter no . ES/ 11 /209/ 95 dt . 16th May, 1996 , the tenure of temporary appointment of Miss Manjeet Kaur, Research Assistant is extended upto 14-5-97 on the terms & conditions as mentioned in the Memorandum no . 103 / 1 /95/DST/Estt . (4)/95 dated 17-1-1996.

Sd/-

REGISTRAR She has admitted that except her there was no research assistant in the DST project . Thus she has also admitted that Dr. Bhagwat Sharma, Dr. S.K.L. Asthana & Negi were Scientist and were in the project from the very beginning, beside these scientist were working in the institute since 1982-83.

Smt . Manjeet Kaur has stated that she has no grievance for absorption of Scientist , she has only grievance is that her services were not extended for further duration and she was terminated on 15-5-97 .

Smt .Manjeet Kaur has examined Dr. Bhagwat Sharma , who has been turn up to give his evidence as per request ofManjeet Kaur, although he was on medical leave from the institute . He has stated that Smt . Manjeet Arora worked upto 98 but could not stated the exact date and month .

Dr. Bhagwat Sharma stated that there was an incident ofChina Jhapati about a flopy between Sri Trilochan Singh &Manjeet Kaur, but he failed to state date and month or . year. He stated that flopy belongs to him , which contained his personal research work pertaining to NRDMS project. He entrusted this flopy to Manjeet Kaur with the instruction that the flopy be not delivered every one .

Dr. Bhagwat Sharma has admitted that none has been appointed as research assistant in the GIS project .

Management of Institute has examined the Principal Investigator Sri Trilochan Singh . He has proved that the 9037 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

GIS projected started on 15-5-95 and completed on 14-5-98 .

He has also proved that the term of employment of Smt. Manjeet Kaur was upto 14-5-97 thereafter her term was not extended nor any other research assistant was engaged . Management of the institute has examined the ex-director ofthe institute .

After careful consideration of the entire evidence on record following facts are undisputed;

1. Smt . Manjeet Arora (Kataria) was appointed as research assistant in GIS project and the term of appointment ended on 14-5-97 and thereafter term of employment was not extended. The appointment was temporary and for specific period . Knowingfully well the . conditions of her appointment she accepted the appointment . The appointment was contractual in nature. Herservices came to an end' automatically on 14-5-97 A.Ν. She was not expected to report for duty thereafter.

Opposite Party's representative has argued that the worker Smt. Manjit Arora stands automatically terminated after 14-5-97 as she was given temporary appointment for a fixed period. In case Navodaya Vidiyalaya Vs. K.R. Hemavathy 2001-1 -LLJ - 779 Hon'ble Karnataka High Court found that thetermination of service after a fixed period amounted to retrenchment , can not be accepted and the same has been relied by the Kerala High Court in between President, Peroorkada Service Cooperation Ltd. Trivendrum and S. Shaina & others (2002 - III - LLJ) Page 459 Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in identical case opened, " In our considered opinion , tribunal as also learned single judge have erred in directing reinstatement of respondent for the simple reason that even if the respondent can be said to have worked continuously for more than 240 days , but still the facts remains that she was working with the appellant under fixed term contract of service and therefore it was not a retrenchment , within the meaning of clause (bb) of Section 2(oo) of the Act which reads as thus ;

2. Smt . Manjeet Kaur unauthorised signed the attendance register after 14-5-97 till 13-6-97.

2(00) "Retrenchment " means the termination by the employer ofthe service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment implicatedby way of disciplinary action , but does not include

Though GIS project lasted upto 14-5-98 but the services of Research assistant was not needed after 14-5-97 and as such neither her term was extefided nor any research assistant was engaged at her place.

(a) *****

(bb) termination ofthe service of the workman as a result of non renewal of the contract of employment between employer and the workman concerned on

its expiry of such contract being terminated under stipulation in that behalf contained therein.

While accepting temporary appointment , respondent very well know that it is for a period and the said appointment for again period was never questioned by her. It is not that by virtue of temporary appointment she had acquired permanent status in the employment .

It is also proved by the management witness that Smt . Manjeet Kaur was not given any work after 14-5-97 and she was informed of the fact that since her tenure was over, she need not come after 14-5-97 . After 15-5-97 when Project Investigator Sri Trilochan Singh saw her in the Bio- stratigraphy computer lab where she was working on computer. Sri Trilochan Singh enquired as to what she is doing and she was ought uninformed she took out the computer floppy. Thereafter Dr. Trilochan Singh enquired about the floppy and wanted to know as to what she was doing. Smt Manjeet Kaur could not offer satisfactory reply and therefore Sri Trilochan Singh asked her to deliver the floppy although she was hesitate to deliver it , with the result Sri Trilochan Singh snatched on checking he find that floppy contained the personal data of Trilochan Singh and Manjeet Kaur was trying to copy out and take it away. After taking possession of floppy Sri Trilochan Singh asked her to mover out as she was no more in the employment . Sri Trilochan Singh reported the matter to the Director orally.

Opposite party has gone in argument stating that thisaspect has been clarified by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case Anand Bihari & others Vs Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation 1991 AIR SC 1003; 1991 Lab IC . 494 with reference to clause (c) of Section 2 (00) of theAct and in case ofVenegopal Vs. Divisional Manager, LIC of India, AIR 1994, SC 1343 Pr. 9. In the latter case , it has been held by the apex court;

The learned representative of the opposite party has argued that after the terms of the employment was not extended, Smt. Manjeet Kaur misused her previous employment and acquaintance with the staff and she tried to go away with the research work of Sri Trilochan Singh. In the circumstances the management has lost it confidence Smt . Manjeet Kaur. Research work on which the Government invests huge amount of money, the same is valuable . She was forgiven as she was a lady and was not inemployment.

"Now with introduction of one more exception to Sec. 2(00) under Clause (bb) , the Legislature has excluded from the purview of " retrenchment " (i) termination ofthe service of the workman as a result of the non - renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry; ( ii ) such contract being terminating under a stipulation in that behalf contained in contract ofemployment. It need not be impressed that if in the contract of employment to such stipulation provided Evidence of Sri Trilochan Singh quite trustworthy which finds support from the evidence of Mr. N.S. Virdi

2211G1/2005-42 9038

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 6 , 2005 / SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii)] orprescribed, then such contract shall not be covered by clause (bb ) of Section 2 (00). In the present case , the termination of service of the appellant is as a result of the contract of employment having been terminated under the stipulations specifically provided under Regulation 14 and the order of the appointment of the appellant in this background the non compliance the requirement of Sec . 25 F shall not violate or nullify the order of termination ofthe appellant."

between State of U.P. and Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Agra and others. Yet in another case, where the services of theworkman were terminated on 13-2-87 as per the terms of contract of employment contained in appointment letter dated 9-1-87 which enable the employer to terminate the service ofthe workman at any stage without assigning any reason the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case Escorts Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer & others 1998 ( SCC L& S) page 235 held that it does not amount retrenchment under Section 2(00) of theAct, since service of the workman were terminated as per the terms of contract .

Opposite party has also relied on the Amit Yadva and others Vs. Delhi Vidyut Board of Hon'ble Delhi High Court 2000 Lab IC 626 where in it is held the petitioners can not claim right to remain on the post beyond the contract period and right to remain on post comes to an end on expiryofcontract period. Opposite party has also argued that eventhe principle of natural justice are not applicable where the termination takes place on the expiry of contract. Opposite party has referred para 15 of the case law 2001 Lab IC 2391 Harminder Singh Vs. Kharga Canteen, Ambala Cantt, para 15 runs as follows;

The worker's representative have argued on the basis ofcase law 2003 SCC L& $ 380 SM Nilakar and other Vs. Telecom District Manager, Karnataka that employment must be shown to be under a contract which stipulates that it would come to an end with expiry of the project or scheme and the worker must be shown to have been made aware of such stipulation at the commencement of their employment . Inthe present case ofworker Smt . Manjit Arora was aware thather tenure ofemployment is to expire firstly on 14-5-96 and thereafter extension which was empire on 14-5-97. Admittedly her services were not extended thereafter. She ofher ownhasbeen putting the signature of the attendance register upto 13th June , 1997. The Project Director ofGIS project who has been examined as management witness No. 1 as stated inthe examination in chiefvery clearly that ManjitArora Ist term 15-5-97 तक था तथा 14-5-97 के बाद मंजीत को कोई extension नहीं दिया गया और न ही कोई कार्य दिया गया 14-5-97 को मंजीत को बताया गया था कि आगे वह न आये और सारा सामान का आस्थाना, वैज्ञानिक को दे दें । "

There is no question to dis -believe the evidence of Trilochan Singh who has clearly stated that after 14-5-97 no one else was employed in her place . He has also stated in para 3 that " 14-5-97 को बता दिया गया था कि उनका कार्यकाल समाप्त हो गया है अतः उन्हें आने की जरूरत नहीं । "

Theargument on the basis of Section 25F is equally misconceived. This section deals with conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen. It would not apply to Para 3 -A because of the definition of retrenchment in Section 2(00) (bb) which expressly excludes "termination of the service of aworkman as a result of the non -renewal ofthe contract of employment between the employer and the workmanconcerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained thereon" . Contracts of service for a fixed term are , therefore , excluded. This Court in Uptron's case ( 1998 AIR SCW 1447: AIR 1998 SC 1681 : 1998 Lab IC 1543 : 1998: AIRLJ 1099) ( Supra) has also held that the principles of natural justice are not applicable where the termination takes place on the expiry of the contract . The decision of a learned single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Balbir Singh Vs. Kurushetra Centra Cooperative Bank Ltd. (1990) I Lab LJ 443 to the extent that it holds to the contrary iterroneous.

Smt . Manjit Arora , should not have signed the attendance register thereafter.

The learned representative of the worker has stated that since the sanction of the budget is received late therefore the management accords its extension after the receipt of the budget . The question is was there any work left over for the research assistant . If not then in that case even thereafter the receipt of budgetary sanction the management is not obliged to appoint Smt. Manjit Arora on the post of research assistant .

Since the worker was admittedly engaged on contract basis on fixed payment, she had a right to continue only till the period of his appointment. The appointment letter of the worker is clearly indicates that she was engaged for certain period and thereafter she had no right of employment on the post of Research Assistant , moreover no other persons has been appointed as Research Assistant in the GIS project . She can not claim parity with the scientists who perform different nature ofjob and who are not industrial worker .

Replying the argument of worker opposite party has argued that if the contract of employment contains any stipulation that the employment could be dispensed with atany stage without reason, then also the termination shall not amount to retrenchment , however in the present case it is not so. He has relied the case law 2003 (99 ) FLR 972

Ithas been argued on behalf of the worker that the Scientists have been absorbed in the service of Wadia Institute whereas Smt. Manjit Arora has been denied the opportunity. I already stated earlier that Smt . Manjit Arora can not claim her absorption and can not claim with the paritywith scientists who have been according to evidence 9039 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

CORRIGENDUM

beingworking for a long period in the various projects of the Institute.

New Delhi , the 14th July, 2005

S.O. 2789.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Corrigendum to the award (Ref. No. 8/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workman, which was received and published by the Central Government on 1-4-2004.

[No. L- 12011 /20/2001 - IR (B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT CORRIGENDUM Hyderabad, the 30th May, 2005 The worker has filed the case law 1998 SCC (L& S) 1601 Uptron Indian Ltd. Vs. Shami Bhan and others the facts ofthis case where all together with different than the present case. The facts ofthe said case was the respondent No.1 was appointed a Operator trainee on 13-5-80 in the establishment . On completion of the training she was absorbed on the post w.e.f. 13-7-8I and was confirmed on 13-7-82 she than acquired the status of permanent employee.Respondent No. I proceed and remained absent till 29-1-85 on maternity leave . Thereafter she allegedly remained absent w.e.f. 30-1-85 to 12-4-85 without any application for leave consequent upon the order dt. 12-4-85 employer informed respondent No. I that her services automatically terminated in clause 17 G of the Certified Standing Order . Whereas the facts of the present case that Smt . Manjit Arora was appointed on contract basis for fixed period and the period was essence of the contract and her services automatically came to an end on expiration ofextended period ofcontract i.e. 14-5-97.

Theworker has filed the following with case laws;

1. 2000 SCC (L& S ) 404 Municipal Corporationof Delhi (MCD) Vs. Prem Chand Gupta and others.

No. ID. 8/ 2001.-Corrigendum to the Award passed in I.D. No. 8/2001 dated 10-3-2004 published in the Official Gazette to be published in Part II , Section 3 , Sub- section IIL of the Gazette of India not later than 4-9-2004 vide notification No. L-12011/20/2001 - IR (B - II) dated 6-8-2004. The Ex. 111 to M16 are typed in Appendix of evidence as follows:

1986(53 ) FLR page 59 between S. Govind Rajiv &others. 2.

3. 2000(87) FLR4between Prabhu Dayal Behari Vs. M.P. Rajya Nagrik Apoorti Nigam Ltd.

Ex. M1I : Copy enquiry proceedings dtd. 18-5-96 Ex. M12: Copy of orders No. HRO: PRS : DAD: 96-97/750 dtd. 28-5-96

None of the above cases are relevant to the facts of thepresent case.

Ex. M13: Copy of orders No. HRO: PRS: DAD: 96-97/751 dtd . 28-5-96

Ex. M14: Copy of WW1's representation dt . 13-7-96 Ex. M15 : Copy of Ir . No. ZO: PRS : DAW: 96-97 : 1863 dtd. 22-10-96

Ex. M16: Copy of list of documents produced in the enquiry dtd. 9-1-96. INSTEAD OF:

From the discussions and case laws cited above and the facts before this court I am considered opinion that the action ofthe management of Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun in terminating the services of Smt.Manjit Arora (Kataria), research assistant w.e.f. 15-5- 97 is legal andjustified as the services ofSmt. Manjit Arora (Kataria) came to an end on 14-5-97 (A.N. ) and in fact no termination order was needed. With the result the worker is not entitled to any relief. Lucknow 5-7-2005

Ex. MII : Bill No. 310 dated 25-2-95 ofM/s. Mini Gas Agencies , Hyderabad.

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

Ex. M12: Bill No. 257 date 5-1-94 ofM/s . Mini Gas Agencies , Hyderabad.

Ex. M13 : Bill No. 281 date 30-1-95 of M/ s Mini Gas Agencies , Hyderabad.

Ex.M14: Bill No. 303 dated 20-2-95 ofM/s . Mini Gas Agencies, Hyderabad.

Ex . M15 : Bill No. 344 date 30-3-95 of M/ s Mini Gas Agencies, Hyderabad

शुद्धि-पत्र नई दिल्ली, 14 जुलाई , 2005 का. आ. 2789.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक आफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट के शुद्धि- पत्र (संदर्भ संख्या 8/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 1-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । और प्रकाशित किया था ।

Ex. MI6 : Bill No. 238 date 16-12-94 of M/ s Mini Gas Agencies , Hyderabad.

E. ISMAIL, PresidingOfficer [सं. एल-12011 /20/2001 - आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरन , अवर सचिव [PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] 9040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 15 जुलाई, 2005

Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofKerala namely :-

"Manakunnam in Kanayannur Taluk in Ernakulam District."

[No. S-38013 /32/2005 -SS- I] JAYA DUBEY, Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 20 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2790.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा-76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध केरल राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात, "जिला तथा तालुक कोट्टयम में मीनडं क्षेत्र "

[सं. एस-38013/31/2005 - एस एस -1 ] जया दुबे, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 15th July, 2005

का. आ. 2792.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोक हित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड (vi ) के उपबंधोंके अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. दिनांक 25-1-2005 द्वारा ताम्बा खनन उद्योग जोकि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 13 में शामिल है को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 5-2-2005 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है ;

S.O. 2790.-Inexercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and ChapterV and VI (except sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofKerala namely:---

अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप - खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 5-8-2005 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[सं. एस -11017/11/97- आई आर ( पी एल ) ] जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi , the 20th July, 2005 "Meenadam in Kottayam Taluk and District . " [No. S-38013/31/2005 - SS -I ] JAYA DUBEY, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 15 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2791.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5. और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध केरल राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्,

S.O. 2792.-Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so requires that in pursuance of the provisions of sub - clause (vi ) of the clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , declaredby the Notificaion of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. dated 25-1-2005 the service in the Copper Mining Industry which is covered by iterr 13 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act , for a period ofsix months from the 5th February, 2005.

Andwhereas , the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period bya further period of six months.

" जिला एरनाकुलम के कणन्नूर तालुक में मनकुन्नम क्षेत्र " [सं. एस-38013/32/2005 - एस एस-1 ] जया दुबे, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th July, 2005

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub -clause ( vi ) of clause (n) of Section 2 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 5th August , 2005.

[No. S- 11017/11/97 -IR (PL); J. P. PATI , Jt . Secy .

S.O. 2791. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which theprovisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and Vi ( except sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and 9041

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 जुलाई, 2005

सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध राजस्थान के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्,-

1. जिला- जयपुर, तहसील - चौंमू के राजस्व ग्राम जैतपुरा, जौँमू, मोरीजा, अनन्तपुरा के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र ।

2. जिला- जयपुर, तहसील- आमेर के राजस्व ग्राम रामपुरा, मोठूका बास, राजावास, आकेड़ा , भट्टों की गली, डाबड़ी, चिमनपुरा व बड़ा गाँव ( जाहोता ) के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र।

का. आ. 2793. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो. पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध राजस्थान के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्,

[सं. एस-38013/35/200 - एस एस -1 ]

संयुक्तारे, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 20th July, 2005 1. " जिला राजसमंद तहसील नाथद्वारा के राजस्व ग्रामों- नाथद्वारा , उपली ओड़न, नाथूवास, कलाखेड़ी बिरान , गूंजोल, करण्या और घाटी क्षेत्र के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र। "

2. " जिला राजसमंद तहसील राजसमंद के राजस्व ग्रामों- बड़ारड़ा, पीपरड़ा, मजा, नान्दोड़ा, तेजपुरिया, दोवड़, देवपुरा , फरारा, कानाडेव का गुड़ा, सुन्दरचा, टुकड़ा खुर्द, डिप्टी , देवाणा के अनतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र जिसमें चूंगी नाका ( दक्षिण ) राजसमंद क्षेत्र भी शामिल है।"

[सं. एस -38013/36/2005 - एस एस-1 ]

संयुक्ता रे, अवर सचिव

S.O. 2794. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI [except Sub-Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Rajasthan namely: - NewDelhi , the 20th July, 2005

1. "Areas comprising the Revenue villages Jaitpura, Chomu , Moriją and Anantpura in Tehsil Chomu ofDistrict Jaipur . '

2. "Areas comprising the Revenue villages Rampura, Mothu -Ka-Bass , Rajawas , Aakera , Bhatton Ki Gali , Dabri , Chimanpura andBada- gaon (Jahota) in Tehsil Amer of District Jaipur. " [No. S- 38013/35/2005 -SS -I]

SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 20 जुलाई , 2005 S.O. 2793. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- Vand VI [ except Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Rajasthan namely :-

1. "Areas comprising the Revenue village of Nathdwara, Uplee Odan, Nathuwas , Kalla Khedee, Biran, Gunjol, Karjya and Ghati areas in Tehsil Nathdwara. "

2. "Revenue village Badarada, Piparada, Maja, Nandora Tejpuria, Dowad, Deopura, Farana, Kanddeo Ka Gura, Sundercha, Tunkara Khurd , Dipti , Dewana includes Check Post (South) Rajsamand in Tehsil and District Rajsamand. "

[No. S-38013 /36/2005- SS -I ]

का.आ. 2795.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध राजस्थान के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्,-

SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

1. " जिला नागौर में मकराना नगरपालिका सीमाओं के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र। "

नईदिल्ली, 20 जुलाई, 2005

2. " जिला नागौर तहसील मकराना के राजस्व ग्राम बोरावड़ तहसील पर्वतसर के राजस्व ग्राम विदियाद के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र। "

[सं. एस-38013/38/2005 - एस एस -1 ]

संयुक्तारे, अवर सचिव का. आ. 2794.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के 9042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15 , 1927

[PART II-SBC.3 ( ii)] New Delhi , the 20th July, 2005

Bhaowa, Kalawat , Gadawat, Pipali-A, Pipali-B , Madwafala Kagdar and Kagdar Bhatiya of Tehsil Kherwara in District Udaipur . "

[No. S- 38013/37/2005-SS- I]

SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 20 जुलाई, 2005

S.O. 2795. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI [ except Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Rajasthan namely :-

1. "The areas comprising the Municipal limits of Makrana inDistrict Nagaur."

का. आ. 2797.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:-

क्र.सं.

जिला

राजस्व ग्राम

राजस्व परगना

राजस्व तहसील 2. "The areas comprising the revenue village of Borawar inTehsil Makrana and Vidiyad in Tehsil Parbatsar District Nagaur ."

सहारनपुर सहारनपुर सहारनपुर

सड़क दुधली, पाडली खुशहालपुर, कुम्हार हेड़ा

[No. S- 38013 /38/ 2005 -SS-I ]

SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 20 जुलाई, 2005

2. उग्राहू, छजपुरा , कैलाशपर, हरौड़ा सहारनपुर सहारनपुर गागलहेड़ी, हरौड़ा मु. , महमूदपुर तिवाई , सोना, लश्करपुर उर्फ चमारी खेड़ा, गन्देवड़ा, जयरामपुर उर्फ नानका

[सं. एस-38013/34/2005 - एस एस -1 ]

संयुक्तारै, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 20th July, 2005

का. आ. 2796.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध राजस्थान के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्,

" जिला- उदयपुर में तहसील खैरवाड़ा के राजस्व ग्राम- थाणा, धुलेव ( ऋषभदेव ), रायणा, कानुवाड़ा, भाऊवा, कलावत, गड़ावत, पीपली ( अ ) , पीपली ( ब ) , माण्डवाफला कागदर एवं कागदर भाटियाँ के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र । "

[सं. एस-38013/37/2005 - एस एस -1 ] संयुक्ता रे, अवर सचिव

S.O. 2797. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 3 ) of Section I of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the Ist August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI [ except Sub- section ( I ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely:-

Revenue

New Delhi , the 20th July, 2005

Tehsil

District

Village

Revenue Paragana

Sarak Dudhali , Padli Saharanpur Saharanpur Saharanpur

Khushhalpur , Kumhar Heda

Harauda

Ugrahu , Chhajpura,

Saharanpur Saharanpur

Kailashpar , Gagalhedi , Harauda, Mehmoodpur Tiwai , Sona, Lashkarpur urfChamarikheda, Gandevra, Jairampur urfNaanka

S.O. 2796. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI ( except Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Rajasthan namely

"The areas comprising the Revenue villages of Thana, Dhuleve (Rishabhdev) , Rayana , Kanuwara,

[No. S-38013/34/2005 -SS -I] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

9043 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 21th July, 2005 नई दिल्ली, 20 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2798. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय- 4(44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय- 5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध राजस्थान के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

S.O. 2799. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- VandVI (except Sub-section (1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas inthe State ofAndhra Pradesh namely:-

"Area falling within the Donthi outskirts in Toopran Mandal ofMedak District.. "

[No. S-38013/40/2005 - SS -I ] "जिला-जोधपुर तहसील लूनी के राजस्व ग्राम बोरानाड़ा, बासनी सिलावटान और नारनाड़ी के अनतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र जिसमें रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र फेज- I, II , III , IV और एक्सपोर्ट प्रमोशन इण्डस्ट्रीयल पार्क ( ई.पी.आई.पी. ) क्षेत्र शामिल हैं। "

SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

[सं. एस-38013/39/2005 - एस एस-1 ]

नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई, 2005

संयुक्ता रे, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 20th July, 2005

का. आ. 2800.-दिल्ली नगर निगम ने उपदान संदाय अधिनियम, 1972 ( 1972का 39 ) , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के अधीन छूट के लिए आवेदन किया है;

और, जबकि केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के नियमित कर्मचारियों को, जो कि सी.सी.एस. ( पेन्शन ) नियमावली के अंतर्गत शामिल हैं , उपलब्ध पेंशन लाभ उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन प्रदत्त लाभों से कम हितकारी नहीं हैं;

S.O. 2798. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- Vand VI [ except Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Rajasthan namely :-

अतः , अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार नियमित कर्मचारियों को, जोदिल्ली नगर निगम के सी.सी. एस. ( पेंशन ) नियमावली के अंतर्गत शामिल हैं; इस अधिसूचना के सरकारी राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से उक्त अधिनियम के उपबंधों से छूट प्रदान करती है । "The areas comprising the Revenue village of Boranada Basni Silavatan and Narnadi of Tehsil Luni District Jodhpur including RIICO Industrial Area, Phase- 1, II , III , IV and Export Promotion Industrial Part (EPIP). "

[सं. एस-42014/2/2001 - एस एस- II ] [No. S- 38013/39/2005 - SS -IJ

SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

संयुक्ता रे, अवर सचिव नई दिल्ली, 21 जुलाई, 2005

NewDelhi , the 22nd July, 2005

S.O. 2800. Whereas the Municipal Corporation ofDelhi has applied for exemption under Sub -section (2) of the Section 5 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (39 of 1972) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act. )

And Whereas in the opinion of the Central Government the gratuity benefit receivable by the regular employees who are covered under the CCS (Pension) Rules ofthe said establishment are not less favourable than the benefit conferred under the said Act,

का. आ. 2799.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप - धारा (3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 अगस्त , 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय- 4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय- 5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबन्ध आन्ध्र प्रदेश के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्ः-

" मैदक जिले के तूपरन मण्डल के अन्तर्गत दौन्टी के वाह्य क्षेत्र।"

[सं. एस-38013/40/2005 - एस एस-1 ]

Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub -section (2 ) of Section 5 of the said Act the Central Government hereby exempts the regular employees who are covered under the CCS (Pension) Rules of Municipal Corporation ofDelhi from the operation of the provisions

संयुक्ता रे, अवर संचिव 9044

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 25 जुलाई , 2005

of the said Act from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette .

[No. S-42014/2/2001 - SS - II] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 22 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2802.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय- 4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध केरल के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: -

" मलपुरम जिला के तिरुर तालुक में त्रिकंडियूर । "

[सं. एस-38013/42/2005- एस एस-1 ]

संयुक्तारे, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 25th July, 2005

का. आ. 2801-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप-खण्ड (vi ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 608 दिनांक 9-2-2005 द्वारा भारत सरकार टकसाल, कोलकता, मुम्बई, नोएडा, चेरलापल्ली ( रंगा रेड्डी ) एवं हैदराबाद जोकिऔद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 11 में शामिल है, को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 19-2-2005 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

अतः , अब , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्तअधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 19-8-2005 से छः मास कीकालावधिके लिए लीक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

S.O. 2802. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August , 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter-V and VI [ except Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Kerala namely:-

[सं. एस-11017/2/2002- आई आर ( पी एल ) ]

जे.पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

" The areas within the Revenue village of Thrikandiyoor in Tirur Taluk of Malappuram District . "

New Delhi , the 22nd July, 2005

[No. S-38013 /42/2005- SS -I ]

SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy .

नईदिल्ली, 25 जुलाई , 2005

S. O. 2801. Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so requires that in pursuance of the provisions of sub -clause (vi ) of the clause (n) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) declaredby the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour No. S. O. 608 dated 9-2-2005 the service in India Govemment Mints , Kolkata/Noida/ Mumbai/ Hyderabad/ Cherlapalli (Ranga Reddy) which is covered by item 11 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act, for a period ofsix months from the 19th February, 2005 .

का. आ. 2803. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 अगस्त , 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध केरल के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: -

" मलपुरम जिला कोट्टयम के कोट्टयम तालुक में पुलिन्यनूर । " And whereas, the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months .

[सं. एस-38013/43/2005- एस एस-1 ]

संयुक्ता रे, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 25th July, 2005

Now, therefore, in excercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub - clause (vi ) ofclause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act, for a period ofsix months from the 19th August , 2005 .

[No. S - 11017/2/2002 - IR (PL) ]

J. P. PATI , Jt . Secy.

S. O. 2803. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August , 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections भारत का राज़पत्र : अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter -V and VI [except Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have alreadybeen brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Kerala namely :-

"The areas within the Revenue Village of Puliyannor in Kottayam Taluk of Kottayam District" .

[No. S- 38013/43/2005 -S.S .-. I ] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 25 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2804.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारी 77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध केरल के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: -

"जिला कोल्लम के पतनापुरम तालुक में करवल्लूर । "

[सं. एस-38013/44/2005 - एस एस-1 ]

संयुक्ता रे, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 25th July, 2005

S.O. 2804. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter - IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter -V and VI [ except Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Kerala namely:-

"The areas within the Revenue Village of Karavalur in Pathanapuram Taluk of Kollam District. "

[No. S-38013/44/2005- SS-I ] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 25 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2805.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78, 79 2211GI /2005-43

9045 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध केरल के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्: -

" जिला तृश्शूर के कोडुगंलूर तालुक में पुल्लाट ।"

[सं. एस-38013/45/2005 - एस एस -1 ] संयुक्ता रै, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th July, 2005

S.O. 2805.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter - IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter - V and VI [ except Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Kerala namely :-- "The areas within the Revenue village of Pullat in Kodungalloor Taluk of Thrissur District . "

[No. S- 38013/45/2005 - S.S. -I] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली , 25 जुलाई, 2005

का. आ. 2806.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 अगस्त, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध केरल के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्: -

" जिला तिरुवनंतपुरम के नेडुमंगाड तालुक में कल्लारा। "

[सं. एस-38013/41 /2005 - एस एस-1 ]

संयुक्ता रे, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th July, 2005

S.O. 2806. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st August, 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter - IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- V and VI [ except Sub - section (1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Kerala namely :-- "The areas within the Revenue village of Kallara in Nedumangad Taluk of District . "

[No. S -38013/41 /2005 - S.S. -I ] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.

9046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/ SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] नईदिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2005

का. आ. 2807.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं० 1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 70/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-7-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-12012/302/97 - आई आर( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 13th July, 2005

S.O. 2807. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 70/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Chandigarh No. 1 as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workman, received by the Central Government on 12-7-2005 .

[No. L- 12012/302/97 - IR( B - II) ]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT 1 CHANDIGARH

CASE No. L.D. 70/98

with excellent record . The services of the workman were terminated vide order dated 17-2-1995 . The workman has claimed that the punishment order dated 17-2-1995 passed by the disciplinary authority and order dated 24-6-97 passedby the appellate authority may be set aside and the workman may be reinstated in service with retrospective effect and allowed all benefits and privileges attached to his post with full back wages . It is also contended on behalf of the workman that during the department enquiry the management prevailed upon the workman to make admission ofthe charges against him and workman defence representative R. K. Walia also colluded with the management and made a promise that management including the disciplinary authority would take a lenient and sympathetic view of the case and he would be left of with some nominal punsihment in case the workman made a confessional statement . That the confessional statement dated 30-7-1994 made before the Enquiry Officer was obtained by undue influence as the opposite party was in a position to dominate the workman will and used that superior position to obtain unfair advantage over the workman and the disciplinary authority and the enquiry officer held a real authority over the workman . The confessional statement relied upon and made basis of the punsihmentby the disciplinary authority is illegal , unlawful . mala fide, void ab initio and unsustainable in the eyes of law and the punishment of dismissal of service and punishment of dismissal of service based on such a confession is also ultravires unconstitutional and is liable to be set aside.

Sarbjit Singh , 8033/27, Street No. 3 , Bahadur Nagar,

Sultan Mind Road , Amritsar .

Applicant

VERSUS

The Zonal Manager, UCO Bank, Sector 22B, Chandigarh.

Respondent

APPEARANCES

Forthe Workman

: Workman with Vikash Chatrath .

For theManagement Shri N. K. Zakhmi Advocate .

AWARD

Passed on 17-6-2005

Central Government vide order No. L- 12012 /302/ 97- IR (B - II) dated 12th of March , 1998 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal of adjudication:

"Whether the action ofthe Management of United Commercial Bank in imposing punishment of dismissal from service to Shri Sarbjit Singh , Clerk , vide Managements order dated 17-2-1995 is legal andjustified ? If not , what relief the said workman is entitled and from which date ? "

2. Workman in his claim statement averred that he was appointed as clerk in UCO Bank Katra Alhuwalia branch Amritsar in April 1981 and served about 13 years

3. The management filed written statement wherein denied allegations of the workman that he made admission ofhis guilt under the undue influence and pressure of the management . It is submitted that workman is guilty of serious acts of misconduct while he was posted at Amritsarbranch of the Bank. He fraudulently withdrew an amount ofRs . 60,000/- from the Saving Bank Account No: 6477 of G.S. Randhawa by two withdrawal of Rs . 30,000/- each on 26-11-1993 and 21-12-1993 respectively whereas Shri G. S. Randhawa had expired on 18-9-1991 as reported by his father. It has also been proved that both the above withdrawals having forged signatures of Shri G.S. Randhawa were posted by workman himself in the saving bank ledger though the workman was not handling the concerned seat . Workman himself entered these withdrawals in token book and got it passed from the passing official of the branch for payment and received the payment of these withdrawals by signing on the rever of the withdrawals slips . These withdrawals slips were not accompanied by the relative pass book of the account holder. When the special assistant passing official insisted for production of pass book of the account holder at the time ofpassing these withdrawals , the workman requested him to pass these withdrawals as the depositor was well known tohim and he take full responsibility by signing on the reverse side of the withdrawal slips . The workman [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

9047 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15, 1927

opened a fictitious saving bank account No. 8648 in the name of Smt . Harjit Kaur and Shri G.S. Randhawa on 6-12-1993 by giving his introduction. He again opened a fictitious FDR Account in the name of Smt . Harjit Kaur wife of Shri G.S. Randhawa . The following charges were established against the workman as mentioned in the charge sheet served upon the workman:-

1. The workman had indulged in the acts which are prejudicial to the interests of the bank which are acts of gross misconducts under Clause 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite settlement .

2. The workman indulged in the acts of abetment by assisting somebody of withdraw Rs . 60,000/- fraudulently from SB Account of Shri G.S. Randhawa and act of gross misconduct under clause 19.5 ( 1 ) of theBipartite Settlement .

duly signed by him and the defence assistant also signed the statement in token of having made confession by the workman himself in his presence . Since the workman admitted all the allegations and the charges specifically before the enquiry officer, therefore, the enquiry officer submitted his enquiry report wherein the enquiry officer held both the charges as contained in the charge sheet full proved against the workman. The disciplinary authority after receiving the enquiry proceedings . Enquiry report submittedby the enquiry officer issued a show cause notice to the workman as to why the proposed punishment of dismissal from bank service may not be imposed upon him . The workman was given personal hearing before the disciplinary authority but the workman failed to appear in spite of being given numerous opportunities by the management . To prove natural justice, the disciplinary authority advised the workman either to appear personally or submit his submission but the workman intentionally and deliberatele did not appear before the disciplinary authority. Hower , the disciplinary authority received a letter dated 2: 1-1995 from the workman wherein the workman had st ted that he would work for the benefit of the institution in future. He also pleaded for lesser penalty. The disciplinmythority after going through the findings ofthe eng officer, written submission by the workman and also taking into consideration and gravity of the charges rassed a final order of dismissal from service vide his letter date 17-2-1995. The action of the respondent bank is legal, just, proper and in accordance with the rules and dism seal is quite commensurate with the charges .

5. That aggrieved by the order dated 17-2-1995 of the disciplinary sathority, workman filed an appeal dated 30-3-1995 before the appellate authority, Zonal Office ChandigarhAppellate authority also gave personal hearing to the workman to enable him to reply or make his submissions in appeal. The workman appeared before the appellate authority on 7-6-97 and admitted having. committed the fraud and requested for leniency and imposing of lesser punishment than the dismissal . The statement given in personal hearing on 7-6-97 was cuontersigned by the workman wherein he had also admitted that he had committed the fraud as mentioned in the charge sheet but the appellate authority rejected the appeal.

6. The management relied upon these documents mentioned above and submitted that the enquiry was conducted and the same is fair, proper and in accordance with the rules. The workman was given full opportunity to prove his innocence but the workman, has admitted his guiltbefore the enquiry officer, appellate aut nority and has submitted his confessional written statement before the enquiry officer and the appellate authority, therefore , admitted facts reed not to be proved . The respondent management reserves the right to prove the acts of misconduct of the workman before this Hon'ble Court if 4. This workman replied the charge sheet vide his reply dated 1-3-1994 admitting all the ALLEGATIONS AND CHARGES. The disciplinary authority in order to prove an adequate opportunity to the workman to prove his innocence and in the interest of natural justice , appointed an enquiry officer to hold departmental enquiry into the charges set out in the charge sheet dated 1-2-1994 . The enquiry Officer issued notices to the workinan and the -presenting officer for appearing for preliminary hearing on 30-6-1994 . But on that day enquiry proceedings could not be held as the enquiry officer was on sick leave and a next datewas fixed for 28-7-1994 , however due to some important official assigriment, the enquiry proceeding could not be held on that day also and the enquiry was postponed to 30-7-1994 and advance notice was given to the workman in this regard . On 30-7-1994 , the charge sheeted employee along with his representative R.K. Walia appeared before the enquiry officer. The enquiry officer read out all the allegations and charge to the workman in the presence of his defence assistant and the presenting officer . The workınan was asked to admit or deny the allegations levelled in the charge sheet . The workman admitted all the allegations and charges . The enquiry officer nade him to understand the implications of his admission . ( 1 ) the workman was not bound to admit the charges and allegations; (2) the admission if made, would be final and no further opportunity would be afforded to the workman to defend himself subsequently ; (3 ) hìs admission could be used against the workman at the time of passing final order of the disciplinary authority. Further the enquiry officer allowed the workman time to rethink about his admission and directed the workman to reappear before him after one hour. Accordingly, after the time given, the workman appeared before the enquiry officer along with his defence assistant and in the enquiry after re- thinking, he admitted all the allegations and charges set out in the charge sheet freely without any pulls , or coercion from any quarter . The workman also submitted a separate written statement in this regard addressed to the enquiry officer.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005 /SRAVANA 15, 1927

9048

this Court finds any infirmity in the enquiry by leading oral as well as documentary evidence .

withdrew an amount of Rs . 60000/- from the saving Bank Account No. 6477 of G. S. Randhawa by two withdrawal of Rs . 30000/- each on 26-11-1993 and 21-12-1993 respectively whereas Shri G. S. Randhawa had expired on 18-9-1991 as reported by his father. It has also been proved that both the avove withdrawals having forged signatures of Shri G. S. Randhawa were posted by workman himself in the Saving Bank ledger though the workman was not handling the concerned seat. Workman himself entered these withdrawals in token book and got it passed from the passing official of the branch for payment and received the payment of these withdrawals by signing on the reverse ofthe withdrawals slips . These withdrawals slips were not accompanied by the relative pass book of the account holder. When the special Assistant passing official insisted for production of pass book of the account holder at the time of passing these withdrawals, the workman requested himto pass these withdrawals as the depositor was well known to him and he tolkfull responsibility by signing on the reverse side of the withdrawal slips . Furhter more he opened a fictitious saving Bank account No. 8648 in the name of. Smt . Harjeet Kaur and Shri G. S. Randhawa on 6-12-1993 by giving his introduction. He agian opened a fictitious FDR Account in the name of Smt . Harjit Kaur wife of Shri G. S. Randhawa .

7. I have heard arguments advanced by both the parties on the fairness of the enquiry conducted by the management . In this case the learned counsel for the workman Shri Chatrath Advocate did not argue and as per the request of the workman , allowed to argue himself. In arguments workman submitted that confession admission was obtained from him under a conspiracy hatched by the management and the rep. of the workman R. K. Walia suggested the workman that in case workman admits his guilt lenient view will be taken against him and his services shall be saved . He will not be terminated except a lenient view taken against him. He also submitted that wrong affidavit has been filed by the enquiry officer that he conducted/held enquiry fairly. He also submitted that principles of natural justice were not complied with and solely on this ground alone enquiry is vitiated and learned Tribunal maydecide this reference in favour ofthe workman ordering his reinstatement with all consequential benefits . He also submitted that domestic enquiry in Industrial law has acquired great significance and industrial adjudication attached considerable importance to such enquiry. In a number of cases , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has said that an enquiry is not an entpty formality but it is essential condition to the legality of the disciplinary order . In other words, before the delingquent workman can be dismmised formisconduct, the employer should hold a fair and regular enquiry into the misconduct and dismissal without holding a regular enquiry would be an illegality. It is also well settled that disciplinary enquiry has to be quasi -judicial enquiry held according to the principles of natural justice and the enquiry officer has a duty to act judicially, because the charges of misconduct if proved will result not only indeprivation of livelihood of the workman but will also attach stigma to his character. Industrial adjudication , therefore, insists on a proper enquiry held and that nothing should happen in the enquiry either when it is held or after it is concluded and before the order of dismissal is passed which would expose the enquiry to the criticism that it wasundertaken as an empty formality. He also submitted that even in a case , he has admitted gulit , still fair opportunity is to be given to the workman to plead his case. It is a settled law that where from certain admissions ofthe employee in the preliminary enquiry, it was concluded that he was guilty of offence, termination of his service without further enquiry would be invalid being voilative of the principles ofnatural justice. The management did not held further enquiry and on the admission of the workman, management had dismissed him and appellate authority also dismissed his appeal upholding the order of the disciplinary authority and the same is bad in law.

9. He was charge sheeted and after charge sheet enquiry officer was appointed and enquiry officer called him and sought his reply and served him a charge sheet . In reply to the charge sheet workman on 1-3-94 submitted awritten typed reply signed by him where he submit that he fully own his responsibility for the fraudulent withdrawals ofRs . 60000/-from SB Account No. 6477 and Shri G. S. Randhawa by two withdrawals of Rs . 30000 each on 26-11-1993 and 21-12-1993 respectively. Both these withdrawals were having singnatures of the Mr. G. S. Randhawa forged by him . These two withdrawals were also-posted by him in saving bank ledger, entered the same in the token book. He had got it passed from Shri O.P. Rajput , and him had received the payment by signing on the reverse of the withdrawal slips as the pass book was not accompanying these withdrawals . Out of the payment received by him of the fraudulent withdrawals dated 26-11-1993 of Mr. G. S. Randhawa he had deposited Rs . 25.000 in PI account of Mr. Parwinder Jit Singh , Sukhwinder Kaur and Mr. Jagjit Singh by filling a cash deposit pay- in - Slip of Rs. 25,000 on 26-11-1993 . It is also confirmed that the above said P - I account was also introduced by him. He further own his full responsibility for opening of a fictitious SB A/c, No. 8648 in the name ofSmt . Harjit Kaur and Shri G. S. Randhawa on 6-12-1993 by giving his introduction . He had deposited Rs . 15000 in the above fictitious account on 21-12-1993 and withdrew a sum of Rs . 1500 on 22-12-1993. The withdrawal form of this account was filled in by him under the signatures of Smt . Harjit Kaur and the payment was also received by 8. On the other hand learned counsel for the management submitted that the workman has committed a gross misconduct embezzlement. He fraudulently 9049 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 6, 2005/ श्रावण 15 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

23-1-1995. In this reply in para 2 he again admitted aş under:-

him, On 21.12.1993 , he again opended a fictitious FDR account in the name of Smt. Harjit Kaur wife of Shri G. S. Randhawa and got issued an FDR of Rs . 15000 out ofthe payment of the fraudulent withdrawal dated 21-12-93 of Mr. G. S. Randhawa . He respectfully submit and confess the blunder which has been committed by him but it happened at the height of moment, so kindly consider his case sympathetically on the basis of him voluntary confession as all the losses occurred to the bank have been made good .

"As I have been charge sheeted dated 1-2-1994 for the involvement in a fraudulent case and also gone through the proposed punishement Vide DM Office letter No. DM/PAD/ 94-95 / 237 dated 29-11-1994 and stated me also to appear in the office dated 12-12-1994 after that date I have been given many chances to appear in your office but I was not well during that time. I was suffering from the backbone pain. Now you have given me that last chance and I requesting you very sympathetically to consider my this submissions . I have not denied any time that a big mistake happened by me and it is not capable of bestowing as per bank's rules .

10. Thereafter workman on 30-7-94 along with Shri R. K. Walia his defence assistant appeared before the enquiry officer . The enquiry officer read out all the charges ofthe charge sheet in the presence of his defence assistant . Charge sheeted employee was asked to admit or deny the each allegation of the charge sheet and he admits all the allegations . At this the enquiry officer made him to understand the implications of admission i.e. that he is not bound to admit the allegations and charges and that the admission, ifmade, will be final and no further oppourtunity shall be afforded to him to defend himself subsequently and that his admission can be used against him at the time ofpassing final order by the disciplinary authority.

I assure you that in future there will be no such incident by me and will work for the benefit of institute . You are also requested to go through my service performance there is nothing against me. In the past years of my service I have worked on very crucial seats and done good work for the sake ofmy bank."

14. Thereafter considering his reply on 17-2-1995 the disciplinary authority passed the final order wherein Sarabjit Singh was ordered to be dismissed from bank service forthwith. He furhter sumbitted that workman again filed anappeal and appellate authority also dismissed his appeal. He aolso made an admission that he appeared before the appellate authority on 7-6-97 and admitted the fraud and requested for leniency and imposition of a punishment lesser than dismissal.

11. Thereafter the enquiry officer again to satisfy himselfthat workman is making a voluntary admission in the presence ofhis defence assistant allowed him to rethink about his admission and directed him to rethink and reappear after one hour. After one hour the workman alsong with his defence assistant appeared and presenting officer was also present . CSE told the enquiry officer that had considdred the implications and thoroughly appplied him mind and after rethinking the admitted all the allegations and charges freely. CSE also gave a separate written satatement in this regard addressed to Enquiry Officer duly signed by him. the defence assistant also signed this statement in token of having made the confession by the CSE in his presence .

12. The enquiry officer in his report thereafter closed the enquiry and also hold that since CSE has admitted allegations specifically and presenting officer closed the case and proceedings in enquiry stand concluded and thereafter enqiry officer sent his report to the disciplinary authority.

15. While summing up his arguments learned counsel for the management submitted that he agreed with the workman that enquiry should not be a formality. The enquiry officer works as a quasi judicial officer and the enquiry is to be termed as quasi judicial enquiry and pricnciple of natural justice are to be followed and the enquiry officer is to act judiciously. But in a case where workman in answer to the charges leveled against him admits his guilt and there remains nothing to enquire and in such acase further enquiry would be a mere empty formality as misconduct admitted by the delinquent employee and there is no volation ofprinciple ofnatural justice . In the instant case,workman has specifically admitted his gulit and made a confession and his defence assistant is also a witnesss. , Complete precausion was taken by the enquiry officer . Thed workmanwas given time to rethink . He also submitted that in view of Service Cases Today 2002 ( 4) Page 882 Prasad Babų Vs. Corporation Bank. It is held by Hon'ble that charges were admitted on basis of assurances by higher officers no material to show that any assurance was given held the light of admitted charges no enquiry was 13. Learned counsel for the management further submitted that disciplinary authority considering the enquiry report and voluntary admission/confession ofthe workman Sarvjit Singh and the fact that charges were serious in nature he proposed the punishment of dismissal against the workman and also sent a show cause notice in this regard to the workman and sought his appearance and submissions . The workman did not appear and after providing him last oppourtunity, workman sent a written reply to the show cause notice of disissal which is dated 9050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 6 , 2005/SRAVANA 15, 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] necessary and order of removal rightly passed .. Similarly our own High Court in 2002 (2) SCT Page 685

contention of the management that in case workman alleges that he gave confession before the enquiry officer under duress, treat or false assurance . He must prove it Even up to appellate stage in this case workman has no where complained that order of dismissal was passed againt him which is against the assurance of the bank . No such ⚫material was brought on record. The workman hasonly orally contended tha it was a conspiracy between management and his defence representative and they give false assurance of lenient view on his pleading guilty that he will be punished lesser than the dismissal .

HAU Vs. Anil Kumar it HAI it is held that in case disciplinary action natural justice - admission of mis-conduct -regular eqnuiry-punshment of remval from service awarded on the basis ofpreliminary fact finding enquiry report wherein the delinquent admitted his misconduct-once admission of miscondut is there , no furhter enquiry was required - in the departmental proceedings the only thing to be seen is the compliance ofprinciples of naturaljustice if the delinquent isissued charge sheet and given oppourtunity to explain and chance to lead evidence his defence if any and even the show cuase against the proposed order of punishment , there is no viloation of natural justice if the charges is serious and stood admitted, punishment of removal is not excessive .

16. He sumbitted that in view of the above law referred by him one can reach only conclusion that the enquiry was fair and the workman has himselfvoluntarily admittred his guilt , the workman is not entitled to any relief.

18. Persuing the entire record, I have found that workman failed to bring any evidence to prove that management has assured him for lesser punishment than dismissal in case he plead guilty of the charges . Therefore , in the absence of such evidence on behalf of the workman and that there is specific admission/ confession of the workman wherein he admitted and confess the entire serious charges of commission of embezzlement specifically, I am of the considered view that the workman hasfailed to prove that he confessed or admitted guilt on the false pretext of the management that a lenient viewwill be taken other then dismissal , I therefore, hold that enquiry is fair and there is no violation of principles of natural justice . Thus the action of the Management of United Commercial Bank in imposing punishment of dismissal from Service to Shri Sarbjit Singh , Clerk , Vide Management's order dated 17-2-1995 is legal and Justifed. Further to which relief the workman is entitled, I further hold and decide this part also in favour of the Management holding that workman is not entitled to any relief. Central Goverment be informed . File be consigned to record .

Chandigarh

Dated: 27-6-2005

17. In view of the above submissions and my perusing the documents and enquiry file and the law referred. I am of the considered opinion that both the parties are not in dispute that in case of enquiry into misconduct enquiry is to held and it should be proper fair and it should not be a empty formality. But at the same time it is also urged by the management that in the case where workman admitted/ consfessed his guilt in the presence of his defence assistant and in appeal also that he confessed his guilt throughout , there is no need to hold furhter regular enquiry and enquiry is to be concluded and punishment of dismissal is not unfair or excessive , further more it is

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.