This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/ 2003-05

REGD. NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05

सत्यमेव जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं० 48 ]

नई दिल्ली, नवम्बर 20 नवम्बर 26 , 2005 , शनिवार /कार्तिक 29-अग्रहायण 5 , 1927 NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 20- NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 , SATURDAY/KARTIKA 29- AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927 No. 48 ]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप -खण्ड (ii ) PART II Section 3 Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

गृह मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ.4363.- सरकारी स्थान ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम, 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग कैस्ते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार नीचे सारणी के कालम ( 1 ) में वर्णित अधिकारी को सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी होने के नाते कथित सारणी के कालम ( 2 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट क्षेत्राधिकार की सीमा के अंदर अधिनियम के प्रयोजनार्थ सम्पदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है और निर्देश देती है कि कथित अधिकारी केरिपुबल के अधिकार अथवा नियन्त्रण के तहत लोक परिसर से संबंधित कथित अधिनियम के अन्तर्गत अथवा उसके द्वारा सम्पदा अधिकारियों को प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेगा तथा सौंपे गए कर्त्तव्यों का निर्वाहन करेगा: -

सारणी

अधिकारी का पदनाम लोक परिसरों की श्रेणियां और क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमाएं

सेक्टर 16- बी , पाकेट-2, द्वारका

नई दिल्ली में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक, केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल ,

888 पारिवारिक क्वार्टर परिसर नई दिल्ली

[फा. सं. ए. दो. -1/2005- प्रशा.-1 , ( द्वारका ) , गृह मंत्रालय-

पीएफ- III ]

एम.एस. कलानिया, अवर सचिव 3276 G1/ 2005

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005 S.O. 4363. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ), the Central Government hereby appoints the officer mentioned in Column ( 1 ) of the table below, being gazetted officer of the Government, to be estate officer for the purposes of the said Act, and further directs that the said officer shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed, on estate officer by or under the said Act in respect of public premises under the control or occupation of the Central Reserve Police Force within the limits ofjurisdiction specified in column(2) of the said table:-

TABLE

Designation of the Officer

Categories ofpublic premises and local limits ofjurisdiction Deputy Inspector Premises of 888 family quarters belonging to the Central General ofPolice , Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi

Reserve Police Force at Sector 16-B , Pocket-2, Dwarka, New Delhi

[F. No. A- II - 1 /2005 -Adm- I (Dwarka )-MHA-PF - III ] M.S. KALANIA , Under Secy.

(12861) [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 12862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

ORDER

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्वविभाग )

New Delhi , the 28th October , 2005 STAMPS

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 17 अक्तूबर , 2005

स्टाम्प

S.O. 4365. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899), the Central Government hereby permits Power Finance Corporation Limited, New Delhi to pay consolidated stamp duty of rupees one crore seventy five lakh seventy five thousand only chargeable on account of the stamp duty on Unsecured Redeemable Non- Convertible Non Cumulative Taxable Bonds -XXIV Series in the nature of Debentures bearing distinctive numbers from 00000001 to 00004750 of rupees ten lakh each aggregating to rupees four hundred seventy five crore only , to be issued by the said Corporation.

का. आ. 4364.- भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम, 1899 ( 1899 का 2 ) की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दी धनलक्ष्मी बैंक लिमिटेड, त्रिशूर को मात्र सात लाख पचास हजार रुपए का समेकित स्टाम्प शुल्क अदा करने की अनुमति देती है, जो उक्त बैंक द्वारा जारी किए जाने वाले मात्र बीस करोड़ रुपए के समग्र मूल्य के ऋणपत्रों के स्वरूप वाले असुरक्षित विमोच्य गैर- परिवर्तनीय गौण बंधपत्रों ( डी बी एल बंधपत्र- श्रृंखला- V ) पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है ।

[No. 34/2005 -STAMP F. No. 33/41/2005 -ST] R.G. CHHABRA, Under Secy.

[सं. 30/2005 - स्टाम्प फा. सं. 33 /39/2005- बि.क. ] आर. जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड ) नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर, 2005

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue)

आयकर

ORDER

New Delhi , the 17th October , 2005

STAMPS

का. आ. 4366.-सर्व साधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ विश्वविद्यालय, कालेज अथवा अन्य संस्था की श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत दिनांक 1-4-2003 से 31-3-2006 तक की अवधि के लिए ' मेडिकल रिसर्च सैन्टर आफ बम्बई हास्पिटल ट्रस्ट, 12 , मैरीन लाईन्स, बम्बई -400020 ' जोअंशतः अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों में कार्यरत है, ( और न कि अनुसंधान के लिए एक मात्र मौजूद ) को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है : -

S.O. 4364 -In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899 ) , the Central Government hereby permits The Dhanalakshmi Bank Limited, Thrissur to pay consolidated stamp duty of rupees seven lakh fifty thousand only chargeable on account of the stamp duty on Unsecured Redeemable Non - Convertible Subordinated Bonds (DBL Bonds - Series V) in the nature of Debentures aggregating to rupees twenty crore only , to be issued by the said Bank .

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के लिए अलग खाते रखेगा ।

[No. 30/2005 - STAMP F. No. 33/39 /2005 - ST ] R.G. CHHABRA , Under Secy.

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर , 2005

स्टाम्प

(ii ) वित्तीय वर्षों के प्रत्येक वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए यह अनुमोदन प्रदान किया जा रहा है , अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के संबंध में लेखा परीक्षित आय एवं व्यय खाते की एक प्रति इसके क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर आयकर निदेशक( छूट ) को आयकर विवरणी दाखिल करने की नियत तारीख को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 90 दिनों के अन्दर, जो भी बाद में समाप्त हो, प्रस्तुत करेगा, जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है ।

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन उपर्युक्त पैरा ( ii ) में संदर्भित आय एवंव्यय खाते के साथ लेखा परीक्षक से प्राप्त एक प्रमाण- पत्र भी संलग्न करेगा : -

का. आ. 4365. भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम, 1899 ( 1899 का 2 ) की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा पावर फाइनेंस कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड, नई दिल्ली को मात्र एक करोड़ पचहत्तर लाख पचहत्तर हजार रुपए का समेकित स्टाम्प शुल्क अदा करने की अनुमति देती है, जो उक्त कारपोरेशन द्वारा जारी किए जाने वाले मात्र चार सौ पचहत्तर करोड़ रुपएके समग्र मूल्य के प्रत्येक दस- दस लाख रुपए के 10000001 से 00004750 तक की विशिष्ट संख्या के ऋणपत्रों के स्वरूप वाले असुरक्षित विमोच्य गैर- परिवर्तनीय गैर- संचयी कराधेय बंधपत्र- XXIV श्रृंखला पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है ।

(क) जिसमें संगठन द्वारा वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान/सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त की गई उस राशि का [संः 34/2005- स्टाम्प फा. सं. 33/41/2005- बि.क. ] आर. जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव

de [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

12863 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर, 2005

आयकर

उल्लेख किया गया हो, जिसके लिए दानकर्ता धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) खंड ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं ।

(ख) जिसमें यह प्रमाणित किया गया हो कि किया गया व्यय सामाजिक विज्ञान/ सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए ही था ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 230/2005/फा. सं. 203/9/2005- आयकर नि.- II ]

निधि सिंह, अवर सचिव

(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2005

INCOME TAX

का. आ. 4367.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी केलिए एत‌द्वारा यहअधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35.की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ विश्वविद्यालय, कालेज अथवा अन्य संस्था की श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत दिनांक1-4-2003 से 31-3-2006 तक की अवधि के लिए सीताराम भारतीय इंस्टीट्यूट आफ साईन्स एण्ड रिसर्च , ब्लाक 1 ई, 216 , आचार्य जगदीश चन्द्रबोस रोड, कलकत्ता-700017, जो अंशतः अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों में कार्यरत है , ( और न कि अनुसंधान के लिए एक मात्र मौजूद ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ ' के रूप में है ) , को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है:-

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के लिए अलग खाते रखेगा ।

S.O. 4366. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Medical Research Centre ofBomaby Hospital Trust , 12, Marine Lines, Bombay- 400020 has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 for the period from 1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 under the category of University , College or other Institution partly engaged in research activities ( and not existing solely for research) subject to the following conditions:-

(1) The approved organization shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities .

(ii ) वित्तीय वर्षों के प्रत्येक वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए यह अनुमोदन प्रदान किया जा रहा है, अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्य-कलापों के संबंध में लेखा परीक्षित आय एवं व्यय खाते की एक प्रति इसके क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर/आयकर निदेशक( छूट ) को आयकर विवरणी दाखिल करने की नियत तारीख को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 90 दिनों के अन्दर, जो भी बाद में समाप्त हो , प्रस्तुत करेगा, जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियनं , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1)के जन्मदा अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है ।

(iii) अनुमोदित संग्न उपर्युक्त पैरा ( ii ) में संदर्भित आय एवं व्यय खातेके साथ लेखा परीक्षक से प्राप्त एक प्रमाण- पत्र भी संलग्न करे :-

(ii) For each of the financial years for which this approval is being given , the approved organization shall submit a copy of its audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of the research activities for which it has been approved under sub -section ( 1) of Section 35 ofI.T. Act, 1961 to the Commissioner of Income Tax/Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) havingjurisdiction , on or before the due date offiling of return of income or within 90 days from the date of this notification, whichever expireslater.

(क) समें संगठन द्वारा वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त की गई उस राशि का उल्लेख किया गया हो, जिसके लिए दानकर्ता धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) खंड ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं । (iii) The approved organization shall also enclose withthe Income & Expenditure account referred to inparagraph (ii) above , a certificate from the auditor:-

[अधिसूचना सं. 232/2005/ . सं. 203/49/2004- आयकर नि. II ]

निधि सिंह, अवर सचिव (a) specifying the amount received by the organization for scientific research/ statistical research in respect of which thedonors are eligible to claim deduction under clause ( ii) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section35 ,

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2005 INCOME TAX

(b) certifying that the expenditure incurred was for research in social science/ statistical research.

[Notification No. 230/2005/F . No. 203/9/2005 - ІТА - I]

S.O. 4367. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Sitaram Bhartia Institute ofScience& Research , Block 1E , 216, Acharya Jagdish ChandraBose Road, Calcutta-700017 has been approved bythe Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii) of NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12864

sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income Tax Act , 1961 , readwithRule 6 of the Income tax Rules , 1962 for the period from 1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 under the category of University, College or other institution partly engaged in research activities (and not as a ' scientific research association' existing solely for research ) subject to the following conditions :-

(i) The approved organization shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities .

(ii) For each of the financial years for which this approval is being given , the approved organization shall submit a copy of its audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of the research activities for which it has been approved under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of I.T. Act, 1961 to the Commissioner of Income Tax/Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction , on or before the due date offiling ofreturn of income or within 90 days from the date of this notification , whichever expireslater.

(iii) The approved organization shall also enclose with the Income & Expenditure Account referred to inparagraph ( ii ) above , a certificate from the auditor :-

(a) specifiyng the amount received by the organization for scientific research/ statistical research in respect of which the donors are eligible to claim deduction under clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section35.

(b) certifying that the expenditure incurred was for research in social science/ statistical research.

[Notification No. 232/ 2005 /F . No. 203 /49/2004- ITA-II] NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर, 2005

आयकर

का. आ. 4368.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ विश्वविद्यालय, कालेज अथवा अन्य संस्था की श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत दिनांक1-4-2003 से 31-3-2006 तक की अवधि के लिए डाइबेटिक एसोसिएशन आफ इंडिया , रहेजा रुग्णालय मार्ग , महीम मुम्बई -400016 , जो अंशतः अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों में कार्यरत है , ( और न कि अनुसंधान के लिए एक मात्र मौजूद ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ' के रूप में है ) , को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है: - (i) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के लिए अलग खाते रखेगा ।

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (ii ) वित्तीय वर्षों के प्रत्येक वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए यह अनुमोदन प्रदान किया जा रहा है अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्य-कलापों के संबंध में लेखा परीक्षित आय एवं व्यय खाते की एक प्रति इसके क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को आय कर विवरणी दाखिल करने की नियत तारीख को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 90 दिनों के अन्दर, जो भी बाद में समाप्त हो, प्रस्तुत करेगा, जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है । (iii) अनुमोदित संगठन उपर्युक्त पैरा ( ii ) में संदर्भित आय एवं व्यय,खाते के साथ लेखा परीक्षक से प्राप्त एक प्रमाण- पत्र भी संलग्न करेगा:-

(क) जिसमें संगठन द्वारा वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान/सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त की गई उस राशि का उल्लेख किया गया हो, जिसके लिए दानकर्ता धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) खंड ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं । (ख ) जिसमें यह प्रमाणित किया गया हो कि किया गया व्ययसामाजिक विज्ञान/ सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए ही था ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 231/2005/फा.सं. 203/20/2004- आयकर नि. II ]

निधि सिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th November , 2005 INCOME TAX

S.O. 4368. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Diabetic Association of India, Raheja Rugnalaya Marg, Mahim , Mumbai -400016 has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income Tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income Tax Rules , 1962 for the period from 1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 under the categorycateg of University , College or other Institution partly engaged in research activities (and not as a ' scientific research association'existing solely for research) subjected to the following conditions

(i) The approved organization shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities.

(ii) For each of the financial years for which this approval is being given, the approved organization shall submit a copy of its audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of the research activities for which it has been approved under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of I.T. Act, 1961 to the Commissioner ofIncome Tax/Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction , on or before the due date offiling ofretum of income or within 90 days .

12865

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

from the date of this notification , whichever expireslater.

उल्लेख किया गया हो, जिसके लिए दानकर्ता धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) खंड ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं । (iii) The approved organization shall also enclose with the Income & Expenditure account referred to in paragraph ( ii ) above , a certificate from the auditor:-

(ख ) जिसमें यह प्रमाणित किया गया हो कि किया गया व्यय सामाजिक विज्ञान/सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए ही था ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 233/ 2005/फा.सं. 203/80/2003- आयकर नि.-II ]

निधि सिंह , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2005

INCOME TAX

(a) specifiying the amount received by the organization for scientific research/ statistical research in respect of which the donors are eligible to claim deduction under clause ( ii ) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35.

(b) certifying that the expenditure incurred was for research in social science/ statistical research.

[Notification No. 231 /2005 /F. No. 203 /20/2004 -ITA-II] NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर, 2005

आयकर

S.O. 4369. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, No. 659, 5th A Main , Hebbal , Bangalore -560-024 has been approvedby the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income Tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income Tax Rules , 1962 for the period from 11-11-2002 to 31-3-2004 under the category ofUniversity , College or other Institution partly engaged in research activities (and not as a ' scientific research association ' existing solely for research ) subjected to the following conditions :-

(i) The approved organization shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities.

का.आ. 4369.- सर्व साधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ विश्वविद्यालय, कालेज अथवा अन्य संस्था की श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत दिनांक 11-11-2002 से 31-3-2004 तक की अवधि के लिए ' अशोक ट्रस्टफार रिसर्च इन इकालोजी एण्ड दि एन्वायरनमैंट, नं. 659, पांचवा ए मेन, हब्बल , बंगलौर -560024 ' जो अंशतः अनुसंधान. कार्य कलापों में कार्यरत है, ( और न कि अनुसंधान के लिए एक मात्र मौजूद ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ' के रूप में है ) , को निम्नलिखित शर्तों केअधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है: -

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के लिए अलग खाते रखेगा।

(ii) For each of the financial years for which this approval is being given, the approved organization shall submit a copy of its audited Income & Expenditure account in respect of the research activities for which it has been approved under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income Tax Act, 1961 to the Commissioner of Income Tax /Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction, on or before the due date of filing of return of income or within 90 days from the date of this notification, whichever expires later.

(iii) The approved organization shall also enclose with the Income & Expenditure account referred to in paragraph (ii ) above, a certificate from the auditor:-

(ii) वित्तीय वर्षों के प्रत्येक वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए यह अनुमोदन प्रदान किया जा रहा है अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के संबंध में लेखा परीक्षित आय एवं व्यय खाते की एक प्रति इसके क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर आयुक्त आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को आय कर विवरणी दाखिल करने की नियत तारीख को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 90 दिनों के अन्दर, जो भी बाद में समाप्त हो, प्रस्तुत करेगा , जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है ।

(a) specifiying the amount received by the organization for scientific research/ statistical research in respect of which thedonors are eligible to claim deduction under clause ( ii ) of sub- section (1 ) of Section35.

(b) certifying that the expenditure incurred was for research in social science/ statistical research.

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन उपर्युक्त पैरा ( ii ) में संदर्भित आय एवं व्यय खाते के साथ लेखा परीक्षक से प्राप्त एक प्रमाण पत्र भी संलग्न करेगा:

[Notification No. 233 /2005/F . No. 203 /80/2003 - ITA- II ]

NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy .

(क) जिसमें संगठन द्वारा वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान/सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त की गई उस राशि का [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 12866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर , 2005

आयकर

clause ( iii) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income tax Rules . 1962 for the period from 1-4-2004 to 31-3-2007 under the category of University , College or other Institution partly engaged in research activities subjected to the following conditions: -

(i) The approved organization shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities .

का. आ. 4370.- सर्व साधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ विश्वविद्यालय , कालेज अथवा अन्य संस्था की श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत दिनांक1-4-2004 से 31-3-2007 तक की अवधि के लिए ' सैन्टर फार रिसर्च इन रूरल एण्ड इंडस्ट्रियल डवलपमैंट ( सी आर आर आई डी ) , सैक्टर 19-ए, मध्य मार्ग , चण्डीगढ़ -160019 ' जो अंशतः अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों में कार्यरत है, को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है :-

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के लिए अलग खाते रखेगा ।

(ii) For each of the financial years for which this approval is being given , the approved organization shall submit a copy of its audited Income & Expenditure account in respect of the research activities for which it has been approved under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofI.T. Act, 1961 to the Commissioner of Income Tax/Director of Income Tax (Exemptions ) having jurisdiction, on or before the due date of filing of return of income or within 90 days from the date of this notification, whichever expires later.

(iii) The approved organization shall also enclose with the Income & Expenditure account referred to inparagraph ( ii ) above , a certificate from the auditor:-

(ii ) वित्तीय वर्षों के प्रत्येक वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए यह अनुमोदन प्रदान किया जा रहा है अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्य-कलापों के संबंध में लेखा परीक्षित आय एवं व्यय खाते की एक प्रति इसके क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर आयुक्त आयकर निदेशक( छूट ) को आय कर विवरणी दाखिल करने की नियत तारीख को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 90 दिनों के अन्दर, जो भी बाद में समाप्त हो, प्रस्तुत करेगा, जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है ।

(a) specifying the amount received by the organization for scientific research/ statistical research in respect of which the donors are eligible to claim deduction under clause (ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35.

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन उपर्युक्त पैरा ( ii ) में संदर्भित आय एवं व्यय खाते के साथ लेखा परीक्षक से प्राप्त एक प्रमाण पत्र भी संलग्न करेगा:-

(b) certifying that the expenditure incurred was for research in social science / statistical research .

[Notification No. 234/2005/F . No. 203/28/2005 - ITA- II]

NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy .

(क ) जिसमें संगठन द्वारा वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान/सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त की गई उस राशि का : उल्लेख किया गया हो, जिसके लिए दानकर्ता धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) खंड ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं ।

कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त उदयपुर, 16 नवम्बर, 2005

(ख) जिसमें यह प्रमाणित किया गया हो कि किया गया व्यय सामाजिक विज्ञान/ सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए ही था । !

[अधिसूचना सं. 234/2005/फा. सं. 203/28 /2005- आयकर नि.- II ]

निधिसिंह , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th November , 2005

INCOME TAX

का. आ. 4371.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 (1961 की 43) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 ग ) की उप- धारा ( vi ) के साथ पठित आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2 गक के द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, उदयपुर " सेठ रामजी दास मोदी विद्या निकेतन सोसायटी, कोटा " को उक्त धारा के प्रयोजन हेतु निर्धारण वर्ष 20000-01 से 2002-03 के लिए अनुमोदन करते हैं ।

परन्तु यह तब जब की सोसायटी आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 ग ) की उपधारा ( vi ) के साथ पठित आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2गक के प्रावधानों की पुष्टि एवं अनुपालना करती है ।

S.O. 4370. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Centre for Research in Rural & Industrial Development ( CRRID ) , SECTOR 19 -A, Madhya Marg , Chandigarh - 160019 has been approved by the Central Governinent for the purpose of 12867 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

उपरोक्तविषय में इस शर्त के साथ अनुमोदन किया जाता है कि संविधान में दिनांक 7-9-2005 को पारित संशोधन को रजिस्ट्रार ऑफ सोसायटी से पंजीकृत करा लिया जाए ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 8 /29/16-11-2005 ]

पी.के. मिश्र , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

का.आ. 4372.- केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4) के अनुसरण में स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय के अन्तर्गत आने वाले निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दीका कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है:-

Udaipur, the 16th November, 2005

1. राष्ट्रीय विषाणु विज्ञान संस्थान, 20 - ए, अम्बेडकर रोड, पोस्टबॉक्स-11 , पुणे।

[सं. ई. 11012/1/94- रा.भा. कार्या. ( हिन्दी-1 ) ]

विनीत चौधरी, संयुक्त सचिव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

New Delhi, the 14th November, 2005 S.O. 4371. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (vi ) of Clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA of the Income-tax Rules , 1962, the Chief Commissioner ofIncome- tax, Udaipur hereby approves " Seth Ramji Das Modi Vidya Niketan Society , Kota " for the purpose of said section for the assessment years 2000-01 to 2002-03 .

Provided that the society conforms to and complies with the provisions of Sub - section (vi ) of Clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 , read with rule 2CA ofthe Income -tax Rules , 1962 .

S.O. 4372. In pursuance of sub -rule (4) ofRule 10 oftheOfficial Language (Use ofofficial purposes ofUnion) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, 80 per cent staff whereofhave acquired working knowledge of Hindi :-

1. National Institute of Virology , 20 -A, Ambedkar Road, Post Box - 11 , Pune.

This approval is subject to the condition that the amendment made to the Constitution vide Resolution dated 7-9-2005 is got registered with the Registrar of Societies .

[No. E - 11012/1/94-OLI(Hindi -I) ] VINEET CHAWDHRY, Jt. Secy.

[Notification No. 8/29/16-11-2005 ] P.K. MISRA, Chief Commissioner of Income -tax

उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

(भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो )

नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4373.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

31अगस्त, 2005 1. आईएस 15585: 2005/ आईएसओ 5755: 2001 सिंटरित धातु सामग्रियां-विशिष्टियां

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं.: एमटीडी 25/टी-66 ]

एस.के. गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 12868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi , the 10th November , 2005

S.O. 4373. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -rule ( 1) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto . annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Date ofEstablished Sl. No. & Year of the Indian Standards No. Established

No. ofyear of Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31August 2005 1. IS: 15585 : 2005 /ISO 5755 : 2001 Sintered metal materials -Specifications

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Stadnards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. MTD 25/T -66 ]

S.K. GUPTA , Scientist ' F' & Head (MTD)

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4374.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हों, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30अगस्त, 2005

आईएस 1500: 1983

1. आईएस 1500: 2005/आईएसओ 6506-1: 1999 धातुओं कीब्रिनेल कठोरता परीक्षण करने की पद्धति (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं०: एमटीडी3 /टी-44]

एस. के. गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

New Delhi , the 14th November , 2005

S.O. 4374.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

12869 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl. No. & Year of the Indian Standards

No. Established

No.& year of Indian Standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30 August 2005

IS 1500 : 1983

1. IS: 1500: 2005 /ISO 6506-1 : 1991 Method for brinell hardness test for metallic materials ( Third Revision )

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 . Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delli - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkatta , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad. Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. MTD 3 /T -44 ]

S.K. GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' & Head (MTD)

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4375.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

31मई, 2005 1. आईएस 11799 2005 ग्रामीण क्षेत्रों में पशु- आवास के लिए अनुशंसाएं ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

आई.एस. 11786: 1986 सामान्य कृष्क के पशु- आवास के लिए अनुशंसाएं आई.एस. 11799 : 2005 ग्रामीण क्षेत्रों में पशु- आवास के लिए अनुशंसाएं

31 मई, 2005 2. आई.एस. 15561: 2005 गन्ना दलित्र सुरक्षा संबंधी अपेक्षाएं

28फरवरी , 2005 3. आई.एस. 15542 : 2005 शक्ति चालित कुट्टी मशीन- सुरक्षा संबंधी अपेक्षाएं

: इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं०: एफण्डी/जी-128 ]

श्रीमती मधुलिका प्रकाश, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( खाद्य एवं कृषि)

New Delhi , the 14th November, 2005

S.O. 4375. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

3276 G1/05-2 12870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

Sl . No. & Year of the Indian Standards No. Established

(2)

(1)

1. IS: 11799 : 2005 Recommendations for cattle housing in rural areas ( First revision) 2. IS 15561 : 2005 Sugarcane Crushers -Safety Requirements

3. IS 15542: 2005 Power - operated chaff cutter- Safety requirements .

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

Date of Established

No.& year of Indian Standards , ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4) (3)

31May, 2005 IS 11786 : 1986 Recommendations for cattle housing for an average farmer

IS 11799 : 2005 Recommendations for cattle housing in rural areas .

31May, 2005

28February, 2005 Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg. New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkatta, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. FAD/G- 128 ]

MRS . MADHULIKA PRAKASH, Scientist F & Head ( Food & Agri . )

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ 4376.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम, 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के संशोधन के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या

संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(1)

(2)

1. आई.एस. 1578 1989 तम्बाकू एवं तम्बाकू उत्पाद- धूम्रपान मिश्रण- विशिष्ट ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण ) 2. आई.एस 2111: 1973 स्नफ-विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

3. आई.एस. 4447: 1994 सोडियम बेंजोइट, खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

4. आई.एस. 4448: 1994 बेंजोइक अम्ल, खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

5. आई.एस. 4463 1973 हुक्का तम्बाकू-विशिष्टि 6. आई. एस. 4750: 1996 सोरबिटॉल पाउडर खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

7. आई.एस 4751 1994 पोटेशियम मैटाबाईसल्फाइट, खाद्य ग्रेड-विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

8. आई.एस. 4752 1994 सोडियम मैटाबाईसल्फाइट, खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन के परिचालन में आने की तिथि (3)

(4)

31अगस्त, 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

30सितंबर, 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

31मार्च 2005 संशोधन संख्या 2

वर्ष 2005

6जून 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

संशोधन संख्या 1

30 सितंबर 2005 वर्ष 2005

31मार्च 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1

वर्ष 2005

10जून, 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

संशोधन संख्या 1

10जून 2005 वर्ष 2005 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

(2)

(1)

9. आई.एस. 5306 1996 सोडियम कार्बोक्सीमिथायल सेलिलोज , खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण ) 10. आई.एस. 5342: 1996 एसकोर्बिक अम्ल, खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

11. आई.एस. 5346 1994 संश्लिष्ट खाद्य रंग- निमित्तियाँ और मिश्रण विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण ) 12. आई.एस. 5643 1999 तम्बाकू एवं तम्बाकू उत्पाद- तम्बाकू की परीक्षण पद्धतियां ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण ) 13. आई.एस. 5707 : 1996 अगार, खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

14. आई.एस. 6030 : 1997 सोडियम प्रोपायोनेट, खाद्य ग्रेड विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

15. आई.एस. 6031 1997 कैलशियम प्रोपायोनेट, खाद्यग्रेड- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

16. आई.एस. 6386 1971 बीटा- एपो-8 कैरोटीनल , खाद्य ग्रेड विशिष्टि

17. आई.एस. 6405 1971 फैन्थाजैन्थाइन , खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि

18. आई.एस. 6797: 1972 बीटा- एपो-8 कैरोटेनोइक अम्ल का मेथाइल एस्टर, खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि

19. आई.एस. 7260 : 1972 बीटा- एपो-8 कैरोटेनोइक अम्ल का एथिल एस्टर, खाद्य ग्रेड-विशिष्टि

20. आई.एस. 7905 : 1996 कैलशियम अल्जिनेट, खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

21. आई.एस. 7928: 1993 एज्लिनिक अम्ल, खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

22. आई.एस. 8846 : 1989 तम्बाकू एवं तम्बाकू उत्पादक- अपचायक शक्कर और सूक्रोज ज्ञात करने की पद्धति ( पहला पुनरीक्षण) 23. आई.एस. 14322: 1996 तम्बाकू एवं तम्बाकू उत्पाद- हुक्के का पेस्ट- तम्बाकू विशिष्टि

24. आई.एस. 14543 2004 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा विशिष्टि

12871 (3)

(4)

28फरवरी 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष2005

30अप्रैल 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

31जुलाई 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

28फरवरी 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

16 अक्टूबर 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

31मार्च 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष2005

31मार्च 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

31 मार्च 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

31मार्च 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

28फरवरी 2005 संशोधन संख्या 2 वर्ष 2005

31अगस्त 2005 संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2005

31जुलाई 2005 संशोधन संख्या 2 वर्ष 2005

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्यतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ सं.: एफएडी/जी-128 ] श्रीमती मधुलिका प्रकाश , वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( खाद्य एवं कृषि)

New Delhi , the 14th November , 2005

S.O. 4376.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standsards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto anexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

12872

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5, 1927

SCHEDULE

Sl. No. & Year of the Indian Standards No.

(2)

(1)

1. IS 1578: 1989 Tobacco and Tobacco products- Smoking mixtures-Specification (Second revision) 2. IS 2111 : 1973 Specification for snuff (First revision)

3. IS4447: 1994 Sodium benzoate , food grade- Specification (First revision)

4. IS4448: 1994 Benzoic acid , food grade-- Specification (First revision )

5. IS4463 : 1973 Specification for hooka tobacco 6. IS 4750: 1996 Sorbitol powder , food grade --- Specification (First revision )

7. IS 4751: 1994 Potassium metabisulphite , food grade-- Specification ( First revision)

8. IS4752: 1994 Sodium nietabisulphite, food grade- Specification ( First revision)

9. IS 5306 : 1996 Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, food grade- Specification ( Second revision ) 10. IS 5342 : 1996 Ascorbic acid . food grade- Specification ( First revision)

11. IS 5346 : 1994 Synthetic food colour-Preparations and mixtures-Specification ( Second revision ) 12. IS 5643 : 1999 Tobacco and tobacco products- Methods of test for tobacco

13. IS 5707: 1996 Agar . food grade -- Specification (First revision)

14. IS 6030: 1997 Sodium propionate , food grade-- Specification ( First revision )

15. IS 6031 : 1997 Calcium propionate. food grade- Specification (First revision )

16. IS 6386 : 1971 Beta - apo - 8 carotenal . food grade- Specification

17. IS 6405: 1971 Canthaxanthine . food grade- Specification

18. IS 6797: 1972 Methyl ester of Beta - apo - 8 carotenoic acid, food grade- Specification 19. JS 7260: 1974 Ethyl ester of Beta - apo - 8 carotenoic acid food grade- Specification

No. & Year of Amendment

Date from which the Amendment shall have effect

(4)

31August 2005 Amemdment No. 1 Year2005

30 September 2005 Amemdment No. 1 Year 2005

31March 2005 Amemdment No. 2 Year2005

6 June 2005 Amemdment No. 1 Year2005

30 September 2005 Amemdment No. 1 Year2005

31 March 2005 Amemdment No. 1 Year 2005

10 June 2005 Amendment No. 1 Year2005

28 February 2005 Amendment No. 1 Year2005

30April 2005 Amemdment No. 1 Year 2005

30April 2005 Amendment No. 1 Year 2005

31 July 2005 Amemdment No. 1 Year 2005

28 February 2005 Amendment No. 1 Year 2005

28 February 2005 Amendment No. 1 Year2005

16 October 2005 Amemdment No. 1 Year2005

31 March 2005 Amendment No. I Year2005

31March 2005 Amendment No. 1 Year2005

31 March 2005 Amendment No. 1 Year 2005

31 March 2005 Amendment No. 1 Year2005 12873 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

31 March, 2005

Amendment No. 1 Year2005

20. IS 7905 : 1996 Calcium alginate, food grade- Specification (First revision )

28 February , 2005

Amendment No. 2 Year2005

21. IS 7928 : 1993 Alginic acid, food grade- Specification ( First revision)

31 August, 2005

Amemdment No. 1 Year2005

22. IS 8846 : 1989 Tobacco and tobacco products- Methods for determination of reducing sugar and sucrose ( First Revision )

31 August, 2005

Amendment No. 1 Year2005

23. IS 14332: 1996 Tobacco and tobacco products- Hooka tobacco paste - Specification

31 July, 2005

Amendment No. 2 Year 2005

24. IS 14543: 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water ) Specification

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Stadnards , Manak Blıavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg . New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Office : New Delhi . Kolkatta . Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Almedabad . Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar . Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune. Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. FAD/G- 128 ].

Mrs. MADHULIKA PRAKASH, Scientist F & Head ( Food & Agri . )

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4377. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में एतद्वारा अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे रद्द कर दिए गए हैं और वापस ले लिये गये हैं: -

अनुसूची

टिप्पणी क्रम रद्द किये गये मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संख्या

भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड (ii) में का.आ. संख्या और तिथि प्रकाशित

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

का.आ. सं . 1759 दिनांक 20 मई , 1967

भारत में कीटनाशक पर प्रतिबंध 1 . आई एस 1311 : 1966 इथाइलिन डाईब्रोमाइड- विशिष्ट ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

का. आ. सं. 1750 दिनांक 07 जून, 1975

भारत में कीटनाशक पर प्रतिबंध 2. आई एस 2126: 1993 फेनिल मरकरी एसिटेट, तकनीकी- विशिष्ट ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

का. आ. सं . 4451 दिनांक 10 दिसंबर, 1983

भारत में कीटनाशक पर प्रतिबंध 3. आई एस 9371 : 1980 एलडीकार्ब ग्रेनूयल्स, एनकैप्सूलेटड

[सं.: एफएडी/जी-128 ]

श्रीमती मधुलिका प्रकाश, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( खाद्य एवं कृषि)

New Delhi. the 14th November . 2005

S.O. 4377. In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987. it is . hereby notified that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are mentioned in the Schedule give hereafter , have been cancelled and stands withdrawn .

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

12874

SCHEDULE

Remarks Sl. No. & Year of the Indian Standards Cancelled No.

S.O. No. & Date published in the Gazette of India. Part - II , Section - 3 , Sub - section (ii )

S.O. No. 1759dated 20 May, 1967

Pesticide banned foruse in India 1. IS 1311 : 1966 Specification for ethylenc dibromide ( first revision)

S.O. No. 1750 dated 07 June , 1975

Pesticide banned for use in India 2. IS 2126: 1993 Specification for phenyl mercury acetate technical ( first revision )

S.O. No. 4451 dated 10 Decmber , 1983 Pesticide banned for use in India 3. IS 9371 : 1980 Specification for Aldicarb granules . encapsulated

[No. FAD/G- 128]

Mrs. MADHULIKA PRAKASH , Scientist F & Head (Food & Agri . )

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4378.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31अगस्त, 2005

आई एस 4132: 1984

1. आईएस 4132: 2005/आईएसओ 6506-3: 1999 ब्रिनेल कठोरता परीक्षण मशीनों में उपयोग हेतु मानकीकृत ब्लॉकों के अंशशोधन की पद्धति ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं.: एमटीडी 3 /टी-46 ]

एस.के. गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

New Delhi , the 14th November , 2005

S.O. 4378. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Date of Established No & Year of the Indian Standards

Established

Sl. No.

No. of year of Indian Standards , ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31 August , 2005

IS4132: 1984

1. IS 4132 : 2005/ISO 6506-3: 1999 Method for Calibration of standardized blocks to be used for brinell hardness testing machines (Second Revision ) 12875 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. MTD 3/T -46]

S.K. GUPTA, Scientist F & Head (MTD)

नई दिल्ली, 18 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4379.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:-

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि संशोधित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

(4) (1)

(3)

(2)

अप्रैल, 2005 1. आई एस 15550 : 2005

मई, 2005 2. आई एस/आई एस ओ/ आई ई सी 17020 : 1998

जून,2005

आई एस 11179 : 1985/

3. आई एस 11179 : 2005/

आई एस ओ 1004: 1977

आई एस ओ 1004 : 1995

अगस्त, 2005 4. आई एस/आई एस ओ 15189/2003

इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं.: एम एस डी/जी-8 ]

प्रवीण कुमार गंभीर, वैज्ञानिकी एफ एवं प्रमुख ( प्रबन्ध एवं तंत्र)

New Delhi , the 18th November , 2005

S.O. 4379. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl. No. & Year of the Indian Standards

No. Established

No. and year of Indian Standards, ifany, Superseded by the New

Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

IS 15550 : 2005

April, 2005 1.

IS/ISO /IEC 17020 : 1998

May, 2005

IS 11179 : 1985/

3. IS 11179 : 2005/

June,2005

ISO 1004 : 1977

ISO 1004 : 1995

4. IS/ISO 15189 : 2003

August , 2005 Copy of above Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and its Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. MSD/G-8]

P.K. GAMBHIR, Scientist F & Head (MSD) [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5, 1927

12876

नई दिल्ली, 26 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4380.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः, अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वनाज इंजीनियर्स लिमिटेड, 85/1 , पाउड रोड, पुणे -41100308 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा निर्मित " एम 0104 " श्रृंखला के डायफार्म गैसमीटर के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वनाज " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 05/ 385 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल गैस पाइप लाइन के माध्यम से निकली हुई गैस के आयतन को नापने के आशय से घरेलू गैसमीटर है । इसकी अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 2.5 मी/घ और न्यूनतम प्रवाह दर 0.016 मी /घ है । इसका अधिकतम प्रचालन दाव 100 मी ग्रा है । इसका यथार्थता वर्ग 21 ° है । इसका प्रयोग पाइप के माध्यम से एल पी जी, प्रोपिन , हवा एवं प्राकृतिक गैस और घटक को मापने के लिए प्रयोग होता है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 191 ) /2004 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12877 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

New Delhi , the 26th October, 2005

S.O. 4380. -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section (3) and sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby approves issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Diaphram gas meter of " M0104 " series (hereinafter referred to as said model) , with brand name " VANAZ " , manufactured by M/ s Vanaz Engineers Limited , 85/1 , Paud Road , Pune -411038 , Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/ 385 ;

The said model is a domestic gas meter intended to measure the volume of gas dispense through pipe line . Its maximum flow rate is 2.5 m³/hr and minimum flow rate is 0.016 m³/hr . The maximum operating pressure is 100m bar g. Its accuracy class is 2%. It is used for the measurement of LPG, Propane and Butane , air and natural gas through pipes .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 191 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276G1/05-3 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12878

नई दिल्ली, 26 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4381.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्टैण्डर्डस मीटर मैन्युफैक्चरिंग कंपनी , सं ० 102/ए 1 , इण्डस्ट्रीयल स्टेट, हदापसार , पुणे -411013 द्वारा निर्मित " ई-003/04 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी मीटर के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्टैण्डर्ड " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 05 /250 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक टैक्सी मीटर है जो समय और दूरी नापने का उपकरण है । यह निरन्तर कुल योग करता है । यात्रा के किसी भी क्षण और किराया तथा तय की गई दूरी के कृत्य के रूप में लोक यान के यात्री द्वारा संदेय किराया और कतिपय चाल से नीचे के लिए लिये गए समय की लम्बाई, प्राधिकृत टैरिफ के अनुसार पूरक प्रभार की संलग्नता दर्शित करता है । " के " घटक 1400 पल्स/कि.मी . है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 12 वोल्ट डी सी विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्वाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 149 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12879 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005 /अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 26th October , 2005

S.O. 4381.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of " Taxi Meter " with digital indication (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) of "E -003 / 04" series with brand name " STANDARDS" manufactured by M/s Standards Meter Manufacturing Company , No. 102/A, Industrial Estate , Hadapsar, Pune -411 013 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /05/250;

The said model of " Taxi meter " is a time and distance measuring instrument wich totalizes continuously and indicates the fare , at any moment ofjourney , the charges payable by the passenger of a public vehicle as function of the distance travelled and below a certain speed, the length of the time occupied, independent of supplementary charges according to the authorized tariffs . The 'k' factor is 1400 pulses/kilometre . The light emitting diode indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 12V direct current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

[F. No. WM-21 (149)/2004)

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 12880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4382.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स प्रेसिशन इलैक्ट्रानिक इंस्ट्रूमेंट कम्पनी , 77 स्वर्ण पार्क, मुंडका, दिल्ली-110041 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-III ) वाले " जीटीबी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( बेबी वेइंग स्केल ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "गोल्डटेक" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/ 875 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिन प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 2 ग्रा. से 100 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित " ई " मान 1 x 10 , 2x 10 या 5 × 10 , क्रे हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (83 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12881 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005

S.O. 4382.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Baby Weighing Scale ) ) with digital indication of " GTB " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III) and with brand name " Goldtech " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Precision Electronic Instrument Co. , 77 Swaran Park , Mundaka , Delhi- 110 041 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005 /875 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Baby Weighing Scale) with a maximum capacity of 30 Kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of J × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same pinciple , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (83 )/2005]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12882

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4383.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स सेंट्रल इंडिया स्केल्स, 116 / सी, छत्रपति नगर, छत्रपति सभागृह के पीछे, नागपुर-440 015 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यर्थाथता वर्ग -II ) वाले " एच पी बी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सत्यम" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005/906 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि.ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी शामिल होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और ' ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10% या 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 133 )/2004 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12883

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005

S.O. 4383. -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "SATYAM" and series " HPB " (herein after referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s . Central India Scales , 116/C, Chhattrapati Nagar, Behind Chhattrapati Sabhagruh , Nagpur -440015 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005 /906;

The said model (See the figure given below ) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 300g . and minimum capacity of 200 mg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10 mg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same pinciple , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (133 )/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2005

का. आ. 4384.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स सेंट्रल इंडिया स्केल्स , 116/सी , छत्रपति नगर, छत्रपति सभागृह के पीछे , नागपुर-440015 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यर्थाथता वर्ग II ) वाले " टी टी बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सत्यम" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्, उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 /907 समनुदेशित किया गयाहै, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ई मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 133 )/2004 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12885 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the , 31st October , 2005

S.O. 4384. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top type) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and brand " SATYAM " and series " TTB " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Central India Scales , 116 /C , Chhattrapati Nagar, Behind Chhattrapati Sabhagruh , Nagpur - 440015 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 /05/907 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 40 g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2 g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent and opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2x 10k or 5x 10k k being the is positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same inanufacturer in accordance with the same pinciple, design and with the same materials with which . the said approved nmodel has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 133 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276 G1/05-4 12886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2005

का. आ. 4385.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेंट्रल इंडिया स्केल्स, 116/सी, छत्रपति नगर, छत्रपति सभागृह के पीछे, नागपुर-440015 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यर्थाथता वर्ग III ) वाले " सी के टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचंन सहित , अम्वचालित उपकरण ( वे ब्रीज प्रकार हेतु कंवर्जन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सत्यम" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005/ 909 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30000 कि. ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि. ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग लिट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उमी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी समग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल की विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी शामिल होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा . या उगमे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 मे 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 133)/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12887 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the , 31st October , 2005

S.O. 4385. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Conversion kit for Weighbridge type ) with digital indication medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and brand " SATYAM " and series " CKT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Central India Scales . 116/C , Chhattrapati Nagar, Behind Chhattrapati Sabhagruh, Nagpur -4400 15 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/909 :

The said model ( See the figure given below ) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30000 kg . and minimum capacity of 200 kg. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 10 kg . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The "instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonn and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for e value of 5 kg . or more and with ' e' value of 110k, 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10* k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same pinciple . design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model have been manufactured.

IF. No. WM- 21 ( 133)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

12888

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4386.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेंगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेंट्रल इंडिया स्केल्स, 116 /सी , छत्रपति नगर, छत्रपति सभागृह के पीछे , नागपुर-440015 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यर्थाथता वर्ग III ) वाले " एच एच श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित उपकरण ( हैंगिग प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सत्यम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005/910 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3,000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 कि. ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और किन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी समग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उमी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी शामिल होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 10 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 133 )/ 2004]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 12889 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the , 31st October . 2005

S.O. 4386. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, thereforc . in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Hanging Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and brand " SATYAM " and series "HS " (herein after referred to as the said Model ) . manufactured by M/ s.Central India Scales. 116 / C . Chhattrapati Nagar, Behind Chhattrapati Sabhagruh. Nagpur - 440015 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/910 ;

The said model ( See the figure given below ) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 3000 kg . and minimum capacity of 20 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1 kg. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , scaling shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said nodel shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg. and up to 10 tonne and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg.or more and with ' c' value of 1 10k, 2x 10k or 5x 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 133 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

12890

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4387.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अंब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेंट्रल इंडिया स्केल्स , 116 /सी, छत्रपति नगर, छत्रपति सभागृह के पीछे, नागपुर-440015 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यर्थाथता वर्ग III ) वाले " एल डब्ल्यू बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित उपकरण ( वे ब्रीज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सत्यम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/ 911 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि. ग्राम है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

atyarn

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोटित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी शमिल होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10.000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान मान अंतराल सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 133 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 12891 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005

S.O. 4387. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers confcrred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbride typc ) with digital indication of mediunı accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and brand " SATYAM " and series " LWB " ( herein after referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Central India Scales , 116/C , Chhattrapati Nagar , Behind Chhattrapati Sabhagruh. Nagpur - 440015 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /05 /911 :

Satyam

The said model ( See the figure given below ) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 40000 kg . and minimum capacity of 200 kg . The verification scale interval ( c) is 10 kg . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to scaling the stamping plate . scaling shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruntents of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' c ' value of 5 kg . or more and with ' c' value of 1 10.2 10 or 5 × 10%, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same pinciple , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 133 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4388.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) वाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कार्टर ग्राउंडफ्यूलिंग यू.के. लि. रॉथरफील्ड्स ग्रंयज हेनले आन थेम्स आम्सफोर्डशायर आर जी 9 , 4 क्यू जी ग्रेट ब्रिटेन द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लि. , भारत भवन , 4 और 6. करिमभोय रोड, बालार्ड इस्टेट , मुम्बई -400 001 द्वारा भारत में प्रयुक्त " आर 54000 टी एस " श्रृंखला के टैंक लॉरी में प्रयुक्त हाने वाले मीटर के लिए मुद्रण युक्ति ( द्रव्यों के लिए मीटर जल को छोड़कर ) के मॉडल का अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13 / 2004/ 472 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक मुद्रण युक्ति है जिसमें टैंक लॉरी इत्यादि में पट्रोलियम उत्पाद के मापन के लिए मीटर ( द्रवों के लिए मीटर- जल को छोड़कर ) के साथ प्रयुक्त होने वाले कीमत और स्मृति फल्नन है । इसका यथार्थता वर्ग 0.5 है और पर्यावरण वर्ग " ग " है । युक्ति का प्रदर्श द्रव क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श ( एल सी डी ) प्रकार का है । यह उत्पाद का नाम कोड ग्राहक की पहचान , टिकट संख्या, आरंभ व अंत का आयतन, तारीख या समय , इकाई कीमत, वैच कीमत इत्यादि सूचना का मुद्रण कर सकता है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 9 ( 17) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12893 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005

S.O. 4388. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it along with the pattern evaluation report and test result granted and approved by the prescribed aythority, a notified body for the purpose in the Netherlands , Netherlands Meetinstituut ( NMI ) is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub -section (3 ) , sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby approves , issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of Printing Device for meter used in tank lorry (Meter for liquids - other than water ) of " R54000ts " series ( hereinafter referred to as said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Carter Ground Fueling UK Ltd. Rotherfields Greys Henley on Thames Oxfordshire RG9 4QG Great Britain and used in India by M/ s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Bharat Bhavan, 4 &6 , Curriumbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai -400001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13/2004/472;

The said model is a printing device with price and memememory function used with meter ( Meter for liquids - other than water ) for the measurement of petrolem product in tank lorrey etc. Its accuracy class is 0.5 and environmental class is " C " Display of the device is of liquid crystal display (LCD) type . It may print information like Product Name orCode, Identification of the customer , Ticket Number, Start and end volume , Date or time, Unit price , batch price etc.

[F. No. WM- 9 ( 17)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276G1/05-5 [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 12894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4389.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स यूनीक डिजीटल , 3 सी पाकेट, ए -१ , गोमती अपाटमेंट, कालकाजी एक्सटेंशन , नई दिल्ली -110019 द्वारा निर्मित " 108 " श्रृंखला के दूरी से निगमित अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी मीटर के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूनीक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005/ 354 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

FRONT VIEW

उक्त मॉडल एक टैक्सी मीटर है जो समय और दूरी नापने का उपकरण है । जो निरन्तर योग करता रहता है और यात्रा के किसी भी समय पर किराया दशीता है । पब्लिक वाहन के यात्री द्वारा संदेय कि प्रभार की गई यात्रा की दूरी और कतिपय गति के नीचे है और अधिकृत समय, प्राधिकृत किराया के अनुपूरक, प्रभारों से मुक्त, किराया उपदर्शित करता है । मीटर की पठन सात भागों में प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) और विद्युत प्रदाय डीसी 8 वोल्ट 16 वोल्ट से उपदर्शित करता है । " के " घटक 1680 पल्स/कि. मी . है ।

स्टांपिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 271 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12895 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005

S.O. 4389. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report subinitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of digital Taxi Meter with digital indication incorporated with a distance (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) of " 108 " series with brand name " Unique " manufactured by M/ s . Unique Digital , 3 -C, Pocket A- 9 , Gomati Appartment, Kalkaji Extension , New Delhi - 110019 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /05 / 354 ;

The said model " Taxi meter " is a time and distance measuring instrument which totalizes continuously and indicate the fare , at any moment of journey , the charges payable by the passenger of a public vehicle as function of the distance travelled and below a certain speed and the length of the time occupied, independent of supplementary charges according to the authorized tariffs . The reading of the meter is indicated by seven segment Light Emitting Diode (LED) and power supply is DC 8V- 16V. The ' K' factor of the meter is 1680 pulses/Kilometer

[F. No. WM- 21 (271)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 12896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4390.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स तनिष्क इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स, 128 , मनभावन नगर, कनाडिया रोड, इन्दौर, मध्य प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " यूनिटेक" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन संहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूनिटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005 / 543 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकशित करती है ;

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. , से 50 मि.ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) और 100 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई" मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 186 )/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

12897

New Delhi , the , 3rd November , 2005

S.O. 4390.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of series " UNITECH " of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " UNITECH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/ s. Tanishk Electronics . 128. Manbhavan Nagar, Kanadiya Road . Indore . M.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/543 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - autoniatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 Kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , scaling shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 5,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg . to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10* or 5 × 10% , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 186)/ 2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12898

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4391.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स तनिष्क इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स, 128 , मनभावन नगर, कनाडिया रोड, इन्दौर, मध्य प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " यूनिटेक" श्रृंखला कि अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूनिटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2005 / 544 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिया प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. , या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या.शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 186)/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12899 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the , 3rd November , 2005

S.O. 4391. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type ) with digital indication of series "UNITECH " of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " UNITECH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Tanishk Electronics , 128 , Manbhavan Nagar , Kanadiya Road , Indore , M.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/ 2005 /544;

The said nodel (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type ) with a maxirnum capacity of 1000 Kg. and minimum capacity of 5 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging above 50 kg to 5000 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k, 2x 10k or 5x 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (186)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4392.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जरावाला डिजीट्रोनिक्स, # 33 , नैनिप्पा नैक्केन स्ट्री, दूसरी मंजिल चैन्नई-600003 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यर्थाथता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जे डी- सीओ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( सिक्के से प्रचालित व्यक्ति तोलन इलैक्ट्रोनिक मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ई- नेशनल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/635 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गैज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 51 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12901 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the , 3rd November, 2005

S.O. 4392. -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument with digital indication (Electronic Coin Operated Person weighing machine) of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) belonging to " JD -CO" series with brand name " e -NATIONAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s.Jarawala Digitronics, # 33 , Nainiappa Naicken Street , 2nd Floor . Chennai -600003 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/635 ;

The said model ( see the figure given above ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with the maximum capacity of 150 Kg . and minimum capacity 2 Kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. The dsiplay is of light emitting diode ( LED ) type . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to scaling the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100 kg . to 200 kg . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of x 10. 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same nranufacturer in accordance with the same pinciple , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (51 )/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276 G1/05-6 12902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4393.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जरावाला डिजीट्रोनिक्स, # 33 , नैनिप्पा नैक्केन स्ट्री, दूसरी मंजिल चैन्नई-600003 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यर्थाथता वर्ग- II ) वाले " जे डी-पी एच" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ई- नेशनल" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/636 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 51 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12903 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi, the , 3rd November , 2005

S.O. 4393. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model ofnon - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of " JD -PH" series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand naine " e -NATIONAL " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s.Jarawala Digitronics. # 33. Nainiappa Naicken Street, 2nd Floor , Chennai -600 003 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005 /05636;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type doad cell based non- automotic weighing instrument (Platfrom type ) with a maximum capacity of 600 Kg . and minimaan capocity of 2.5 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diod (LED indicates the weighting result ) . The instrument operates on 230 Volt and50 Hertz alternative.current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the oponing of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shalt also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging above 50 kg. to 1000kg and with mumber of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,0XX forte value of 100 mg. or more and with' c' value of 1 × 102 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured. by the saine manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the sanie materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 51 )/2005 )

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 4394.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एप्पल एन्स्ट्रुमेंटेंशन 101 , रवि प्लाजा , दरियापुर टावर के सामने , अहमदाबाद -380001 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यर्थाथता वर्ग- III ) वाले " स्मार्ट " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एप्पल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 211 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

SMART APPLE TABLE TOP ) CAPACITY.30 kg ACCURACY : CLASS 謝

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड से आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें ए आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टॉम्पिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक की " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा.या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मानं 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 55 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

12905 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

New Delhi , the 3rd November , 2005

S.O. 4394. - Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " SMART " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " APPLE " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Apple Instrumentation, 101 , Ravi Plaza . Opp. Dariapur Tower, Ahmedabad- 380 001 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2004/211 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) dsiplay indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

SMART APPLE ( TABLE TOP )

LAPALITY

ACCURACY GLASS

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ` e` value of 100 mg . to 2g. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the saine principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 55 ) /2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANΝΑ 5, 1927

12906

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4395.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, किन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एप्पल एन्स्ट्रुमेटिंशन 101 , रवि प्लाजा , दरियापुर टावर के सामने , अहमदाबाद-380001 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित साधारण यथार्थता , ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए एन सी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का,, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एप्पल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 212 ममनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनदम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

APPLE PERSONAL WEIGHTY CAPACITY : 150 kg . ACCURACY : CLASS IV

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 कि.ग्रा. से 150 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 55 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12907

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 3rd November , 2005

S.O. 4395.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Person weighing machine ) with digital indication of ordinary accuracy ( Accuracy class - IIII ) of series - ANC and with brand name " Apple " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Apple Instrumentation , 101 , Ravi Plaza, Opp . Dariapur Tower , Ahmedabad - 380 001 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/212;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatie weighing instrument (Person weighing machine ) with digital indication . Its maximum capacity is 150 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) dsiplay indicates the weighting result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

APPLE PERSONAL WEIGHTY

CAPACITY : 180 kg. ACCURACY: CLASS - IV

practices. In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to stop the opening of the machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100 kg . to 150 kg . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 1,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k, 2x 10k or 5 × 10 k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same imanufacturer in accordance with the same pinciple, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (55 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 4396.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एप्पल एन्स्ट्रुमेंटेंशन 101 , रवि प्लाजा , दरियापुर टावर के सामने , अहमदाबाद-380001 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -111 ) वाले " ए सी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एप्पल" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 213 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

APPLE

APPLE CRANE SCALE CAPACITY : 10 ΤΟΝ ACCURACY:CLASS- IN

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्दूज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकन करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 55) /2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12909 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग 11-खण्ड 3 (ii) L

New Delhi , the 3rd November . 2005

S.O. 4396. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Goveruntent hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Crane type) with digital indication of AC series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "APPLE " ( herein referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/ s. Apple Instrumentation , 101 , Ravi Plaza , Opp. Dariapur Tower , Ahmedabad- 380 001, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/ 213 ;

APPLE

APPLE CRANE SCALE CAPACITY : 10 ΤΟΝ ACCURACY: CLASS - III

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane type ) with a maximum capacity of 5000 kg . and ininimum capacity of 20 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 1 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 5000kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10 %, 2 x 10 or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same pinciple, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (55) /2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276G1 /05-7 12910

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4397.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एप्पल एन्स्ट्रुमेंटेंशन 101 , रवि प्लाजा , दरियापुर टावर के सामने , अहमदाबाद -380001 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यर्थाथता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यूई " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एप्पल ' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 214 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

APPLE

APPLE WIRGHBRIDGE CAPACITY : 50 ΤΟΝ ACCURACY : CLASS - III

उक्तमॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोडसेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकालनात्मक धारित्त आयेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकन करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदिढ़ मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 55 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

12911 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4397. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge type ) with digital indication of " AWE " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " APPLE " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Apple Instrumentation , 101 , Ravi Plaza, Opp. Dariapur Tower, Ahmedabad - 380 001 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/214;

ACCURROTO

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge type ) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg The verification scale interval (e) is 5 kg It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of ute said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall , also cover the weighing... instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum enpacity above 5 tonne andipto 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for te value of 5 kg: or more and withe valuc of 1x 10 %, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10* where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured the same manufacturer in accordance with the same pinciple , design and with the same materials with which the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (55)/2003 ) :

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12912

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 4398.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , आब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मल्टी वे ( इण्डिया ) प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, रोपड रोड, पट्रोल पम्प के निकट, ग्राम - चौकीवाल, नालागढ़, हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यर्थाथता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एम डब्ल्यू सी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मल्टी वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/2005/440 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आयेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केंन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा . तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापान मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या. शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 (42)/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12913 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the , 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4398. - Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " MWC series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "MULTI WEIGH " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Multi Weigh ( India ) Private Liniited , Ropar Road. Near Petrol Pump , Village -Choukiwal , Nalagarı , Himachal Pradesh which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 9/2005/440 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 20kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Уранпа

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , scaling shall also be done to preverit the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of Imgto 5t ) mg and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with' c ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principl , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (42)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

12914

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4399.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स दीप मार्केटिंग , ए/ 2 , शगुन फ्लैट कासमोविला शे हाऊस के पास प्रेमचन्द नगर रोड, सैटलाइट, अहमदाबाद-380015 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यर्थाथता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डी डब्ल्यू-30 टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज के लिए कनर्वशन किट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डिगी वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005/ 437 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेंट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करतं. है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधितम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 05 )/2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12915

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग 11-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the , 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4399.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge type ) with digital indication of " DW -40T " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Digi Weigh " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Deep Marketting , A/2 , Shagun Flats Near Cosmovila Row House , Premchand Nagar Road, Satellite, Ahmedabad - 380 015 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/437;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge type ) with a maximum capacity of 40 tonnes and minimum capacity of 100kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5kg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10 , 2 x 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same pincipl , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (05 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4400.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाएं रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स दीप मार्केटिंग, ए/2, शागुन फलाट कासमोविला शे हाऊस के पास , प्रेमचंद नगर रोड, सैटलाइट, अहमदाबाद-380015 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्य॑म यर्थाथता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डी डब्ल्यू-30टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज के लिए कनर्वशन किट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डिगी वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005 /438 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज के लिए कनर्षशन किट ) प्रकार का है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. , या उससे अधिक के ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10%, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 05 )/ 2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12917 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the , 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4400. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Conversion kit for Weighbridge ) with digital indication of " DW - 30T series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name "Digi Weigh " ( hercin referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Deep Marketing . A/ 2. Shagun Flats. Near Cosmovila Row House, Permchand Nagar Road, Satellite , Ahmedabad - 380015. Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 /2005/438 :

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit for Weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne. and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to scaling the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( 11 ) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg . or more and with ` e` value of 1 10. 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles . design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (05)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 3276G1 /05-8 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12918

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4401.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेटीलर- टोलीडो इंडिया प्रा.लि. , अमर हिल, साकी विहार रोड, मुम्बई द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यर्थाथता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " रिटेल किंग एस डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के दोहरी रेंज का अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मीटलर टोलीडो' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005/ 280 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) का अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 1 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलमात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अन्तराल, सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10. 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 110 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12919 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

New Delhi , the, 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4401. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) of dual range with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) of "Retail King SW" series with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M / s. Mettler - Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. Amar Hill , Saki Vihar Road , Mumbai and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2005/280;

The said model is a strain gauge load cell based non -automatic weighing insto ... ble top spets maximum capacity 20 kg . and minimum capacity of 20 g. The value of verifications after is 1 g. upto 10 kg and 2 g. above 10 kg . and up to 20 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtracias e retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply. The machine is also having price computing piece counting and printing facility.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the povers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of he said Act. the Central Governinent hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2 g. and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 x 10 %, 2 × 10% or 5 x 10% , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been inanufactured.

JF. No. WM- 21 (110)/2004)

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of. Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12920

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4402.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आंकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप-धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेटीलर - टोलीडो इंडिया प्रा . लि. , अमर हिल, साकी विहार रोड, मुम्बई द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यर्थाथता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " रिटेल किंग एस डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के दोहरी रेंज का अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मीटलर टोलीड़ी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005 / 281 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड मेल आधारित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 किग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 5 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्याम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अन्तराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 x 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।"

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 110)/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12921 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4402. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in excrcise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of " Retail King PC " series with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Mettler - Toledo India Pvt . Ltd .. Amar Hill , Saki Vihar Road , Mumbai and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/281 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) . Its maximum capacity of 15 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The value of verification scale interval ( e) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternative current power supply. The machine is also having price computing . piece counting and printing facility .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, scaling shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power, conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maxintum capacity upto 50 Kg . with verification seale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. to 2 g . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e valuc of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10% or 5 10 % where . k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 110)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 12922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4403.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्पान फिलिंग सिस्टम प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, शेड सं. 20, हरीचंद कंपाउंड, एल बी एस ( वेस्ट) मुम्बई, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा निर्मित " डब्ल्यू एफ-30 " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित गुरुत्वमापी भरण उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्पानपैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/392 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित भरण उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है । द्रव क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । जिसका अधिकतम आउटपुट बहुनोजल 24 भरण/ मिनट है । उपक्रण 440 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । इसका प्रयोग दुग्ध, मिनरल वाटर, तेल, फलों का रस, कीटनाशक, अरक इत्यादि द्रवों को भरने में प्रयुक्त होती है । स्टाम्मिग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और किन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के भरण मशीन भी होंगे जो 200 ग्रा. से 30 कि.ग्रा. या समतुल्य तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 190 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12923 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927.

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4403. - Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Ritles . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and 10 render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling' Instrument of series " WF - 30 " ( herein referred to as the said model ) and with brand name " SPANPAK " manufactured by M/ s . Span Filling Systems Private Limited, Shed No. 20. Harichand Compound, L.B.S. Marg ( West ) . Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2005 /392 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument of a maximum capacity of 30 Kg . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD ) indicates the weighing results . Its maximum output is 60 fills per minute through multiple nozel . It operates on three phase AC 440 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply . It is used for filling liquids like milk , mineral water , oil fruit juice , pesticides , arrack ete .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , scaling shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the filling machine of similar inake , accuracy and performance of same series with capacity ranging between 200 kg . to 30 kg. or equivalent volune manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 190)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4404.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित पाधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गयी है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) वाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखोगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

WF -300

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज भार सेल आधारित म्वचालित भरण उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. है । द्रव क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उम्रदर्शित करता है । जिसका अधिकतम आउटपुट बहुनोजल 24 भरण/मिनट है । उपकरण 440 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । इसका प्रयोग दुग्ध , मिनरल वाटर, तेल , फलों का रस , कीटनाशक, अरक इत्यादि द्रवों को भरने में प्रयुक्त होती है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 30 कि.ग्रा. से 1000 कि.ग्रा. या समतुल्य तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 190 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12925 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4404. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument of series " WF - 300 " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) and with brand name " SPANPAK " manufactured by M/ s . Span FIlling Systems Private Limited, Shed No. 20 , Harichand Compound, L.B.S. Marg (west ) , Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/393 ;

300

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument of a maximum capacity of 300 Kg . The liquid Crystal Display (LCD) indicates the weighing results. Its maximum output is 24 fills per minute through multiple nozel. It operates onthree phase AC 440 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply . It isused for filling liquids like milk, mineral water, oil fruit juice, pesticides, arrack etc.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 190)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 3276Gl/05-9 12926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4405.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 को ८० ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्पान फिलिंग सिस्टम प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, शेड सं ० 20, हरीचंद कंपाउंड, एल बी एस मार्ग ( वेस्ट ) मुंबई, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा निर्मित " वी एफ -30 " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्पानपैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 05 / 220 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल पूर्व नियम आयतनिक स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन प्रकार ) है इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30000 मि. लि. है । इसका अधिकतम आउटपुट 80 भरण 1 मिनट है । उपकरण 440 वोल्ट और 50 हटर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । यह द्रवों जैसे दुग्ध , मिनरल वाटर, तेल, फलों का जूस , रस, कीटनाशक, अरक इत्यादि को भरने में प्रयुक्त होती है ।

म्टांपिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के भरण मशीन भी होंगे जो 10 मि.ली. से 30000 मि.ली. की क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 190 ) /2004]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12927 भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4405. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service, under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic Filling Machine (Piston type) of series " VF -30 " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) and with brand name " SPANPAK" manufacturedby M/ s . Span Filling Systems Private Limited, Shed No. 20, Harichand Compound , L.B.S. Marg (West ) , Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/220 ;

The said Model is a bre - set volumetric Automatic Filling Machine (Piston type ) of a maximum capacity of 30000ml . Its maximum output is 80 fills per minute. It operates on three phase AC 440V and 50 Hertz alternative curtesat power supply . It is used for filling liquids like milk, mineral water , oil fruit juice, pesticides , arrack etc.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 190 )/2004 )

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12928

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4406.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अत , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्तं शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्पान फिलिंग सिस्टम प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, शेड सं० 20 , हरीचंद कंपाउंड, एल बी एस ( वेस्ट) मुंबई, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा निर्मित " वी एफ-300 " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्पानपैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/05 /221 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल पूर्व नियम धनात्मक विस्थापन प्रकार का स्वचालित भरण मशीन है इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 लीटर जो एकल और बहुपिस्टन वाली है । इसका अधिकतम आउटपुट 24 भरण 1 मिनट है । उपकरण 44 वोल्ट और 50 हटर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है। यह द्रवों जैसे दुग्ध, मिनरल वाटर, तेल , फलों का जूस, रस , कीटनाशक, अरक इत्यादि को भरने में प्रयुक्त होती है ।

स्टांपिगप्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के भरण मशीन भी होंगे जो 30 लीटर से 1000 लीटर की क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 190 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12929 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4406.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic Filling Machine of series " VF- 300 " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) and with brand name " SPANPAK" manufactured by M/ s . Span FIlling Systems Private Limited, Shed No. 20, Harichand Compound , L.B.S. Marg (West) , Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /05/ 221 ;.

The said model is a pre - set positive displacement type Automatic Filling Machine of maximum capacity 1000 Litre with sigle or multiple piston. Its maximum output is 24 fills per minute . It operates on three phase AC 440V and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply . It is used for filling liquids like milk , mineral water, oil fruit juice, pesticides , arrack etc.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM-21 (190 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 12930

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4407.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमीदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जी ई सी स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, 20/82 , यमुना किनारा, धर्म कांटा के सामने, जीओनी मंडी, आगरा, 282004 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " जी ई टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जी ई सी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 / 505 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टांपिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माणकिया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. , से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 41 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12931 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the , 7th November , 2005

S.O. 4407. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " GET" series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " GEC " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured by M/ s . GEC Scale Industries , 20/82 , Jamuna Kinara, Opposite Dharam Kanta , Jeonoi Mandi , Agra - 282004 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/05/ 505 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) indicate the weighing result . The instrument operates on 2310 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Governmnent hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' c ' value of 1mg to 50 rng and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 10,2 × 10 or 5x 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (41 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 12932

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4408.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स जी ई सी स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज , 20/82, यमुना किनारा, धर्म कांटा के सामने, जीओनी मंडी, आगरा, 282004 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जी ई टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "जी ईसी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/ 506 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टांपिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. , से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 %, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 41 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12933 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

New Delhi , the , 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4408.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GET " series of Medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " GEC " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured by M/s .GEC Scale Industries , 20/82, Jamuna Kinara . Opposite Dharam Kanta . Jeonoi Mandi , Agra- 282004 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2005/506;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. Its has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) indicate the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5gior more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k k being a is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 41 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276G1 /05-10 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 12934

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4409.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स जी ई सी स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, 20/82 , यमुना किनारा , धर्म कांटा के सामने, जीओनी मंडी, आगरा, 282004 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " जी ई पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "जी ईसी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005 / 507 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टांपिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. , या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक कीअधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 41 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12935 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

New Delhi , the 7th November , 2005

S.O. 4409. -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of " GEP" series of high accuracy (accuracy class- II ) and with brand name " GEC " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured by M/s . GEC Scale Industries , 20/82 , Jamuna Kinara , Opposite Dharam Kanta, Jeonoi Mandi, Agra - 282004 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/507;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Plateform type) with a maximum capacity of 2000kg and minimum capacity of 10kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tareeffect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicate the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging above 50kg to 5000kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design, accaracy and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (41 )/2005]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

12936

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4410.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जी ई सी स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, 20/82, यमुना किनारा , धर्म कांटा के सामने, जीओनी मंडी, आगरा , 282004 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जी ई पी " श्रृंखला के अंकेक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जीईसी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्नआई एन डी/09/05/508 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) लोड का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है।कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 41 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12937 भारत का राजपत्र मवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November , 2005

S.O. 4410. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36. of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating non - automatic , (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GEP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "GEC" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . GEC Scale Industries , 20/82, Jamuna Kinara, Opposite Dharam Kanta, Jeonoi Mandi , Agra-282 004 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/508;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 2000kg and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 200g . It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg and with number of verificaion scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10 , 2 x 10 or 5 × 10 * where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (41 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12938

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4411.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कृष्णापथ एन्टरप्राइजेज, बोहरा गणेशजी मन्दिर के सामने, उदयपुर, राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " के ई-102 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एनर्जी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05/ 878 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार का ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है। जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा . से 2 ग्राम के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज मेंसत्यापन मापमान अंतराल( एन ) और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (183 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12939 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November , 2005

S.O. 4411. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic (Table top Type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " KE- 102 " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ENERGY" ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Krishnapath Enterprises , Opp . Bohra Ganeshji Temple , Udaipur , Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 2005/ 878;

The said Model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Herts alternative current power supply .

000

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 183 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 12940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4412.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कृष्णापद्म एन्टरप्राइजेज , बोहरा गणेशजी मन्दिर के सामने, उदयपुर, राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले "के ई-101 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एनर्जी" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्त उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/ 877 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार का ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 11 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 1 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्वाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्राम के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 183)/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

12941 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4412. -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of " KE - 101 " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " ENERGY" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Krishnapath Enterprises , Opp . Bohra Ganeshji Temple , Udaipur , Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/877 ;

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 11kg and minimum capacity of 50g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 1g. It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Herts alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of to 50g and with nomber of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10% , 2x 10 % or 5 x 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (183 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276 Gl/ 05-11 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12942

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4413.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कृष्णापथ एन्टरप्राइजेज , बोहरा गणेशजी मन्दिर के सामने , उदयपुर, राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले "के ई-103" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एनर्जी " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/879 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है. कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से अधिक और 5000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं मान और " ई " 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 183) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12943 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4413.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self imdicting non- automatic (Platform type ) weighing instru ; nent with digital indication of "KE - 103 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ENERGY" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s. Krishnapath Enterprises , Opp . Bohra Ganeshji Temple , Udaipur , Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/ 879;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimuıncapacity of 2 kg . The verificaion scale interval (e) is 100g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicate the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Herts alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000 kg and with number of verificaion scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 183 )/2015 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12944

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4414.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृत्ति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 59 ) / 2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12945 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4414.Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of "TANDEM - TJ" series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " SCALETECH" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Scaletech Instruments and Services Pvt . Ltd. , # 246 (Old # 137) , Angappa Naicken Street, 1st Floor , Facing Errabalu Street , Parrys , Chennai - 600 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /05/483 ;

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 g and minimum capacity of 200 mg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10 mg . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Herts alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 5,000 for ' e' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k or 5x 10%, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 59)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12946

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4415.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मामक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्केल टेक इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स सर्विस प्रा ० लि० # 246 ( थुराल # 137 ) अंगप्पा नइकेन स्ट्रीट , पहली मंजिल, इराबालू स्ट्रीट के सामने, पेरिज , चेन्नई-600001 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " महावीर एम एच " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप्त प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्केल टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 05/ 484 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मद्रांकन करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा . से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 x 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 59 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12947 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4415. - Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "MAHAVIR- MF " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " SCALETECH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Scaletech Instruments and Services Pvt . Ltd. , # 246 (Old # 137) , Angappa Naicken Street , Ist Floor, Facing Errabalu Street, Parrys , Chennai - 600 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 05/484;

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5 g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g or with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2x 100 or 5 × 10%, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 59)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12948

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ 4416.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी ठक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्केल टेक इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स सर्विस प्रा० लि० # 246 ( थुराल # 137 ) अंगप्पा नइकेन स्ट्रीट, पहली मंजिल, इराबालू स्ट्रीट के सामने, पेरिज , चेन्नई-600001 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " स्केल टेक एस आई एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लैटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्केल टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05/485 संमनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्द और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10, 2 × 10* या 5 × 10*, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 59 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

12949

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4416. -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating , non- automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "SCALETECH - SIS " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) and with brand name " SCALETECH" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Scaletech Instruments and Services Pvt. Ltd. , # 246 (Old # 137) , Angappa Naicken Street , 1st Floor, Facing Errabalu Street, Parrys , Chennai -600 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/485;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verificaion scale interval (e) is 200 g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5000 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10%, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approval model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 59 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276 G1/05-12 [PART II- Sec . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

12950

नई दिल्ली , 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4417.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अंब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टेक्नो कंसलटेंट, # उत्तर उसमान रोड, टी नगर , चेन्नई 600017 द्वारा निर्मित स्वतः सूचक, स्वचालित, भारात्मक भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन फिलर ) यांत्रिकी प्रकार, " टी सी पी एफ " श्रृंखला के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टेक्नो " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09 / 05/ 767 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक यांत्रिकी प्रकार का भारात्मक भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन फिलर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2 ग्रा. से 1000 ग्रा. या मि. ली में समतुल्य आयतन है । इस में बहु ट्रैक सिस्टम है, जो पैकेट में, चिप चिपे द्रव्य उत्पाद जैसे खाद्य तेल, घी, वनस्पति, मासरीन इत्यादि को भरने और सीलबंद करने में प्रयोग किया जाता है । इसकी भरत दर, 30 भरत प्रति मिनट है ( अधिकतम ) जो पैकट के आकार और द्रव्य में चिप चिपाहट पर निर्भर करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और किन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तौलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 2ग्रा. से 1000 ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले रेंज में हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (20 )/ 2005 ) पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माय विज्ञान 12951 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4417. -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , Automatic Gravimetric Filling Machine (Piston Filler) of mechanical type of "TC- PF " series with brand name "TECHNO" (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s . Techno Consultants , # 138 , North Usman Road , T. Nagar , Chennai -600 017 and which is assigned the apprival mark IND/ 09/05/767;

The said model is an automatic gravimetric filling machine (Piston Filler) of mechanical type with a capacity in the range of 2 g to 1000 g or equivalent volume in ml . It has multi- track system for filling the packets and sealing device used for filling of viscous liquid products like vegetable oils , ghee, vanaspati , margarine etc. as the case may be. It fills 30 fills per minute ( max . ) depending upon the size of the pack and viscosity of the liquids.

In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[ F. No. WM - 21 (20 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 12952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4418.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मामक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स साई तेजा पैकेजिंग सिस्टम्स, प्लॉट नं ० 28 , उत्तर कमला नगर, ई सी आई एल पोस्ट, हैदराबाद-500062 द्वारा निर्मित स्वतः सूचक, स्वचालित, भारात्मक भरण मशीन ( टाइम आधारित एफ एफ एस मशीन ) " नाइस पैक- जी एफ " श्रृंखला के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नाइस पैक " है (जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 05 /765 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक स्वचालित भारात्मक भरण मशीन ( टाइम आधारित एफ एफ एस मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 ग्रा. से 1000 ग्रा. या मि. ली में समतुल्य आयतन की रेंज में है । यह गुरुत्व प्रवाह सिद्धांत पर कार्य करता है और यह फैबरिक, सफेदी, नील , दूध , छाछ , ताड़ी, खनिज पानी जैसे मुक्त बहने वाले सभी गैर - चिपचिपे द्रव्य को भरने में प्रयोग किया जाता है । इसकी भरत 20 भरत प्रति मिनट है ( अधिकतम ) पैकट की और द्रव्य की मात्रा के ऊपर निर्भर है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 10 ग्रा. से 1000 ग्रा. तक की रेंज में क्षमता वाले हैं ।

। फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 46 )/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

12953

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4418. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , Automatic Gravimetric Filling Machine (Time based- FFS Machine) of "NICE PAC - GF" series with brand name "NICE- PAC" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sai Teja Packaging Systems , Plot No. 28 , North Kamala Nagar , ECIL Post , Hyderabad-500 062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /05/ 765 ;

The said model is an automatic gravimetric filling machine (Time based - FFS Machine ) with a capacity in the range of 10g to 1000g or equivalent volume in ml . It works on the principle of gravity flow and used for filling of all free flowing non - viscous liquids like fabric , whitener , blue, milk, butter milk, arrack, mineral water etc. It fills 20 fills per minute ( max. ) depending upon the size of the pack and quantity of the liquids to be filled .

In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM- 21 (46)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 12954

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 / AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 31 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4419.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स साल्टर स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, आर-2360 , न्यू टैक्सटाइल मार्किट , रिंग रोड, ( सहारा दरवाजे के सामने ) सूरत, गुजरात द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस ए जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल ५ प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " साल्टर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005/ 606 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 12 कि. ग्रा. औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टांपिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएंगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. , तक " ई " माम के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मास के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 32) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12955 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi, the 7th November , 2005

S.O. 4419. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " SAJ ' series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - 11 ) and with brand name " SALTER " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Salter Scale Industries , R- 2360 , New Textile Market , Ring Road , Opp . Sahara Darwaja, Surat , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/606 ;

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 12kg . and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval (e) is 1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) displays indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

SALTER

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10% , or 5× 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved modei has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (32)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12956

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

नई दिल्ली , 7. नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4420.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स साल्टर स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज , आर-2360 , म्यू टैक्सटाल मार्किट , रिंग रोड, ( सहारा दरवाजे के सामने ) सूरत , गुजरात द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस ए एच पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " साल्टर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005/ 607 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलम उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 20 ग्राम हैं । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति हैजिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SALTER

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केंन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्राम से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक ' ई ' गान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के" ई" मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 500 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के सपतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 32 ) /2004 )

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

12957 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4420.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type) with digital indication of " SAHP " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " SALTER " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M / s.Salter Scale Industries , R- 2360, New Textile Market , Ring Road, Opp . Sahara Darwaja , Surat, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/607;

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Plateform type) with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 20g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

SALTER

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the pawers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 500kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (32) /2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276 GI /05-13 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 12958

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. . 4421.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और भाप मामक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स वोल्टेक इंडस्ट्रीज , 39/5429 , ब्रिज एवेन्यूरोड, पानमपिल्लीनगर , कोचीम -20 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " वी बी- टी टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेवलटोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वोल्टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/429 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन अस्वचालित उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्राम हैं । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्मिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए उसे खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद की जाएगी । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्राम से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के" ई" मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सस्थापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 45 )-2005

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक विधिक नार 12959 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.Q. 4421. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digite indication of " VB - TT " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " VOLTEK" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Voltek Industries , 39/5429, Bridge Avenue Road, Panampilly Nagar , Cochin - 20 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /05/429;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternatue current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to preventevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2x [ t ) , or 5x10k k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 (45)/2005)

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12960

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4422.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त लेषा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स वोल्टेक इंडस्ट्रीज, 39/5429 , ब्रिज एवेन्यूरोड, पानमपिल्लीनगर, कोचीप -20 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " वी बी- टी पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक संचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वोल्टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005 /430 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यषकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक को अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 45) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12961 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4422. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Mosures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self indicating non - automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " VB - TP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " VOLTEK" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/s . Voltek Industries , 39/5429 , Bridge Avenue Road, Panampilly Nagar , Cochin -20 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/430;

The said Model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5000kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 10 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10%, or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (45)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4423. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मामक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी, सराय रोहिला , दिल्ली -110007 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ई एल " श्रृंखला के अंककसूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सनशुय जापान " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2005/ 412 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप का प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यपान मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्राम हैं । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, और 50 हर्ट्स प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्राम से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के है, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (40 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12963 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi, the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4423.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " EL " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II) and with brand name " SHIMADZU JAPAN " ( herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/ s . Electronic System, 84, Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla , Delhi - 110007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/412 ;

The AccurateWeighing System

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of 50kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of lx 10 % , 2x 10% or 5X10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufachwer in accodance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F.No. WM - 21 (40)/2005]

P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 12964

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5 , 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4424.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स `इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम, 84, विवेकानन्दपुरी , सराय रोहिल्ला , दिल्ली -110007 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " डी जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सनशुय जापान " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2005 /413 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

SUNSMI JAPAN

The Accutate Weichit

उक्त मॉडल एकविकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमप्ता 15 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यपान माषमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 1 ग्राम हैं । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्राम से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक ' ई' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (40 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

12965 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.Q. 4424. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weighis and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " DJ " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " SUNSUI JAPAN " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Electronic System , 84 , Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla , Delhi - 110007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/05/413 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) displays indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accaraeg and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50, 000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2× 10 %, or 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 40)/ 2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276 G1 /05-14 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 12966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4425.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह सभाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मालक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम , 84 , विवेकानन्दपुरी , सराय रोहिल्ला, दिल्ली-110007 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " जी डी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टीप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सनशुय जापान " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2005/414 सभमुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है। सत्यपान मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्राम हैं । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिवत कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्राम से50 मि. ग्रा. तक ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 केरेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्याभान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 x 10 , 2 x 10 * या 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. ब्ल्यू एम -2340) पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, निषिकान 12967 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi . the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4425.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the fig. e given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " GD " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II) and with brand name " SARTO GERMAN " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Electronic System , 84, Vivekanandpuri , Sarai Rohalla , Delhi - 110007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05 /414;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 15 kg and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval (e) is 1g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stainping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in range of 100 to 50 , 000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k, or 5× 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (40)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 मवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4426.- केम्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मामक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स महेन्द्रा स्केल्स, श्री विश्वनाथ नगर, दबोहा लसकर रोड, भिन्ड -477001 मध्य प्रदेश द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले एम एस पी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " महेन्द्रा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005 /432 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकन करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिकके ' ई' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 109 )/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12969 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the 7th November , 2005

S.O. 4426. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and ine said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of " MSP " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III) and with brand name "MAHENDRA " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Mahendra Scales , Shri Viswanath Nager , Daboha Laskar Road, Bhind -477001 , Madhya Pradesh which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/432;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 2000kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10%, or 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 109)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] 12970

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4427.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इंपैक फेब्रीकेशन्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , सी-17, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , ए पी आई आई सी जोनल आफिस के समीप , कोका कोला फैक्टरी के निकट, मौला अली, हैदराबाद -500040 द्वारा निर्मित " आई एफ पी एल - ए " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( औगर फिलर प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " आई एफ पी एल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/05/ 739 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( औगरफिलर ) है । इसकी क्षमता 1000 ग्रा. या समतुल्य मात्रा की रेंज में हैं । इसका उपयोग दुग्ध पाउडर, मसाले, काफीचूर्ण, चाय चूर्ण, डिटर्जेंट पाउडर, भूमि से प्राप्त मसाले, दंत मंजन, रसायन आदि गैर मुक्त प्रवाह वाले उत्पादों को भरने के लिए किया जाता है । इसका उत्पादन अधिकतम 60 भरण प्रति मिनट है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकन करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (340 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12971

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November , 2005

S.O. 4427. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating , Automatic , Filling Machine (Auger Filler ) of " IFPL- A " series with brand name " IFPL" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Inpack Fabrications Private . Limited. , C- 17 , Industrial Estate , adjoining to APIIC Zonal Office, Near Coca Cola Factory , Moula - Ali , Hydrabad - 500040 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 05/ 739;

The said model is an automatic filling machine ( Auger Filler ) with a maximum capacity of 1000g or of equivalent volume . It is used for filling the non - free flowing products like milk powder , spices , coffee powder , tea powder, detergent powder , ground spices, tooth powder , chemicals etc. Its output is inaximum 60 fills per minute. The instrument operates on single phase 230- Volts 3 KVA and 50- Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM- 21 : 340 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12972

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4428.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इंपैकफेब्रीकेशन्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, सी-17 , इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, ए पी आई आई सी जोनल आफिस के समीप, कोका कोला फैक्टरी के निकट, मौला अली, हैदराबाद -500040 द्वारा निर्मित्त " आई एफ पी एल - वी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन फिलर प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " आई एफ पी एल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/05/740 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन फिलर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 ग्रा. या समतुल्य मात्रा की रेंज में है । इसका उपयोग खाद्य तेल, घी, मेगरीन आदि जैसे विसकस द्रव उत्पादों को भरने के लिए किया जाता है । इसका उत्पादन अधिकतम 50 भरण प्रति मिनट है। उपकरण 230 वोल्टयां और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी कियाजाएगा ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 340 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

12973 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

New Delhi, the 7th November , 2005

S.O. 4428. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic Liquid Filling Machine (Piston Filler) of " IFPL- V " series with brand name " IFPL " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Inpack Fabrications Private Limited, C- 17, Industrial Estate, adjoining, to APIIC Zonal Office , Near Coca Cola Factory , Moula- Ali , Hydrabad- 500040 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/740;

The said model is an automatic filling machine ( Piston Filler) with a maximum capacity of 1000g or of equivalent volume. It has sealing device and is used for filling of viscous liquid products like edible oil , ghee, magarine , etc. Its maximum output is 50 fills per minute. The instrument operates on single phase 230 -Volts and 50- Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM- 21 (340 )/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3276 GI /05-15 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 12974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4429.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , आब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ट्रेपकोमाइक्रोन इंडस्ट्रीज प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, यूनिट सं. 63 , भन्दूप इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट , पन्नालाल कोम्प , एल बी एस मार्ग, भन्दूप (प. ) मुंबई-400078 द्वारा निर्मित " 211 के एस " श्रृंखला की स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन फिलर ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ट्रेपको माइक्रोन " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 09/ 05 /652 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन फिलर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 ग्रा. या समतुल्य मात्र की है और क्षमता रेंज 10 ग्रा. या मि.ली. से 500 ग्रा. या मि ली. है । इसका उत्पादन 2500 भरण प्रति घंटा है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । इसका उपयोग दही, आईसक्रीम आदि जैसे विसकास उत्पादों को भरने के लिए किया जाता है ।

फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (286 )/2004]

[ पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 12975 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4429. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic filling machine (Piston Filler) (herein referred to as the said model ) of series ' 211 KS ' and brand name " TREPKO MICRON " , manufactured by M/s . Trepko Micron Industries Private Limited , Unit No. 63 , Bhandup Industrial Estate , Pannalal Comp . L.B.S.Marg , Bhandup ( W) , Mumbai -400078 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/652;

The said model is an automatic filling machine (Piston Filler) with single filling point having maximum capacity of 500g or equivalent volume and capacity range is 10g or ml to 500g or ml . Its output is 2500 fills per hour . It operates on 230/440 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply . It is used for filling the viscous products like Curd, Ice cream, etc.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM - 21 (286)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 12976

[PART 11-- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4430.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनयम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी और भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 3133 तारीख 2 सितम्बर , 2005 द्वारा उड़ीसा राज्य में पारादीप से पश्चिमी बंगाल राज्य में हल्दिया तक इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा कच्चे तेल के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन हेतु उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मे विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशाय की घोषणा की थी ।

और , उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता की तारीख 29-9-2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना है ।

अतः , अन्न, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , घोषणा करती है कि इश अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार पाइपलाइनें विछाए जाने हेतु अर्जित किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भुमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड मे निहित होगा। [भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

12977

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

अनुसूची

पुलिस थाना: नन्दकुमार

राज्य: पश्चिमी बंगाल

जिला: पूर्व मिदनापुर

गाँव का नाम

अधिकारिता सूचि संख्या

क्षेत्रफल

प्लॉट संख्या

(1)

(2)

(3)

4138 शीतलपुर

2593

4139

2546

1718 भबानीपुर

1717

1670

1675

1677

1676

1679

1680

2267

2268

1703

1702

1700

1695 पुलिस थाना - चण्डीपुर

799 भगबानखाली ( भाग- ॥ )

801

802

803

816

817

826 पुलिस थाना - खेजुरी

खारन

127

681

682

683

695

698

699

696/1114 पुलिस थाना - भगवानपुर

153

448 तेथिवाड़ी

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर एयर

(4)

(5)

(6) 00

83 00

91 00

41 00

92 00

51 00

24 00

08 00

99 00

27 00

40 00

28 00

92 00

87 00

89 00

22 00

65 00

26 00

23 00

56 00

86 00

37 00

80 00

51 00

24 00

00 88 03

11 00

49 [PART 11---SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

12978

( 6)

(5)

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

449

451

455

[फा. सं. आर-25011/20/2005- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 21th November , 2005

S. O. 4430.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3133 dated the 2nd September, 2005, issued under sub - section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of crude oilfrom Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia in the State of West Bengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited ;

And whereas , the copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 29-9-2005 And whereas , the competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report, is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by the sub- section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.

12979

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Schedule

State:West-Bengal PoliceStation: Nandakumar

District: Purba Midnapur

Nameof Village

Jurisdiction ListNo.

Hectare

Area Are SquareMetre

Plot. No.

(6)

(4)

(5)

( 3)

(2)

( 1 )

4138

Shitalpur

2593

4139

2546

1718

Bhabanipur

1717

1670

1675

1677

1676

1679

1680

2267

2268

1703

1702

1700

00 09 00 888

1695

PoliceStation - Chandipur

799

Bhagabankhali ( Part-II )

801

802

803

816

817

00 00 ৪৪৪

826

PoliceStation - Khajuri

681

127

Kharan

682

683

695

698

699

00 00 00 03 01

696/1114

PoliceStation -Bhagabanpur

448

Tathi Bari

165

449

491

8888 00 00

[F. No. R-25011 /20/2005-O.R. - I ) S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

12980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAY ANA 5 , 1927 [PART 11 - SEC . 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4431.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्य प्रदेश में मांगल्या (इन्दौर ) संस्थापन से हरयाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्दीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50), की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिये उसमे उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री दीपक नन्दी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुम्बई मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना, भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, बी-105, इन्द्र विहार, तलवण्डी, कोटा में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 324005 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रूप

अनुसूची

तहसील: सांगोद

जिला: कोटा

राज्य: राजस्थान

क्र० ग्राम का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में 1

1 धूलेट

पड़त

0.1600

2 टोस्या

0.0020

3 मांडूहेडा

287

0.0040

आँवा

652

0.0070

5 खड़ीपुर

672

0.0250

676

0.0070

575

0.0100

736

0.0440

672/741

0.0220

731

0.0440

6 खजूरी

384

0.0070

7 कुराड

1669

0.0290

1671

0.2315

1671/1936

0.2310

1668

0.0920

1660

0.0040

1651

0.0800

962

0.0215

961

0.0425

960

0.0900

965

0.0220

[फा०सं०आर०-31015/76/2004-ओ आर-II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

12981 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the 24th November, 2005

S. O. 4431.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Manglya (Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, an extension pipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT ofDelhi should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule , may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Deepak Nandi , Competent Authority, Mumbai -Manglya Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, B- 105 , Indravihar , Talwandi , Kota- 324005 (Rajasthan) .

SCHEDULE

TEHSIL : SANGOD

DISTRICT : KOTA

STATE : RAJASTHAN S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE

SURVEY NO .

AREA IN HECTARE 1

1 DHULET

PADAT

0.1600 2 TOSYA

0.0020 3 MANDUHEDA

287

0.0040 4 AANWA

652

0.0070 5 KHADIPUR

672

0.0250

676

0.0070

575

0.0100

736

0.0440

672/741

0.0220

731

0.0440 6 KHAJURI

384

0.0070 7 KURAD

1669

0.0290

1671

0.2315

1671/1936

0.2310

1668

0.0920

1660

0.0040

1651

0.0800

962

0.0215

961

0.0425

960

0.0900

965

0.0220

[ F.N. R- 31015 / 76/2004-OR- II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secretary 3276 GI/05-16 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

12982

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4432.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2511 तारीख 07 जुलाई, 2005, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 16 जुलाई, 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इंदौर) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई- मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 13 सितम्बर, 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है,, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता हैं ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला: कोटा

तहसील: सांगोद

सर्वे नंबर क्र० ग्राम का नाम

3 1 2

1594 1 धूलेट

1569

1568

1548

1549

1554

1553

1552

1551

1546

1535

1534

1533

1498

1497

1430

पड़त

254 2 चरचड़िया उर्फ काशीपुरा

255

251

249

263

248

264

245

266

268

270

271

272

273

278

279

207

208 क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

0.3325

0.0940

0.0580

0.2025

0.0220

0.0150

0.0075

0.0220

0.2025

0.2745

0.1700

0.0290

0.0220

0.1190

0.0150

0.1800

0.0720

0.1160

0.0580

0.3465

0.0290

0.1015

0.1080

0.0150

0.2740

0.1800

0.1015

0.0360

0.0290

0.0020

0.0875

0.1305

0.0800

0.0075 12983

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

3 2

206 2 चरचड़िया उर्फ काशीपुरा

200 (जारी....)

199

198

589 3 लोढ़ाहेड़ा

589/966

586

587

586

583

582

581

580

579

578

577

579/961

576

575

522/967

573

523

522

519

520

344

438

425

446

447/963

447

448

450

421

422

420

419

418

162/264 4 टोस्या

162/265

165

166

159

111

106

18 0.1095

0.3030

0.1440

0.0360

0.1305

0.0650

0.0040

0.0435

0.0075

0.1375

0.0220

0.4320

0.0870

0.0720

0.1305

0.0075

0.0220

0.0075

0.0040

0.1520

0.2745

0.0220

0.2815

0.0150

0.1080

0.0290

0.1160

0.0290

0.0220

0.2095

0.0075

0.2315

0.0150

0.0220

0.0290

0.0075

0.1665

0.0150

0.3030

0.0220

0.1015

0.0720

0.2025

0.0290

0.1735

0.1015

0.0150

0.0360

0.0290

0.0150

0.0020

0.0720

0.0075

0.0150

0.2095

0.0650

0.1800 12984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

19 4 टोस्या (जारी.....)

104 टोल्या

102

113

114

101

19 6 केशोली

389

390

391

388

396

384

382

368

370

369

363

299

301

361

303

304

311

309

312

313

1 7 बाछीछेड़ा

970

967 [PART 11 - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

0.0075

0.1230

0.0075

0.2025

0.0220

0.0075

0.1735

0.1800

0.0075

0.0220

0.1445

0.0290

0.1230

0.0040

0.0075

0.1015

0.0870

0.0040

0.1880

0.2240

0.0040

0.3535

0.0940

0.1375

0.0360

0.0720

0.0220

0.0800

0.0720

0.0075

0.1880

0.2880

0.0870

0.0075

0.2120

0.2315

0.0075

0.0290

0.0360

0.0720

0.1520

0.2460

0.0440

0.0075

0.0360

0.2520

0.2160

0.0720

0.2520

0.0220

0.1095

0.1445

0.2020

0.1735

0.0510

0.0580

0.1520

0.1015

0.1160

0.0360

0.0435

0.0360

0.0220 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

968 7 बाछीहेड़ा (जारी.....

964

974

976

953

952

950

951

942

943

944

945

906

923 8 सारोला

351 9 मांडूहेडा

350

347

348

349

346

340

345

329

330

319

320

322

323

324

271

301

300

299

284

286

288

290

291 10 हिंगोनिया

532

543

542

541

540

539

537

519

521

539/731

518

517

516

515

486

467

488

503

481

482

483

479

478

12985 4

0.0220

0.0150

0.2740

0.1300

0.2615

0.0070

0.0650

0.1230

0.1080

0.0360

0.0720

0.0040

0.0075

0.0150

0.0040

0.0360

0.0220

0.0040

0.2895

0.0075

0.0440

0.0435

0.0360

0.4900

0.0580

0.0720

0.0220

0.0020

0.0360

0.0720

0.1590

0.0510

0.2400

0.2520

0.0720

0.0020

0.0875

0.0150

0.0220

0.0020

0.0510

0.0655

0.0580

0.0020

0.0870

0.0945

0.0360

0.0150

0.0020

0.0650

0.1165

0.0360

0.0150

0.0075

0.0020

0.1080

0.1300

0.0020

0.0720 12986

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

3 1

485 10 हिंगोनिया (जारी......)

477

273

275

275/753

275/752

284

285

298

300

301

302

303

304

21/773

21/772

21/771

318 11 खेड़ी

317

316

315

313

314

54 12 बिशनपुरा

837 13 गोपालपुरा

838

839

823

824/873

824

770

771

765

767

764

763

762

683

684

685

686

687

693 4

0.0150

0.0020

0.0440

0.1800

0.0360

0.1080

0.1735

0.3175

0.0075

0.2160

0.1080

0.2385

0.0720

0.0360

0.1160

0.3600

0.0560

0.0290

0.1375

0.1080

0.0290

0.0655

0.1375

0.0075

0.1440

0.1230

0.0720

0.0150

0.3035

0.1300

0.4470

0.0435

0.0945

0.2520

0.1590

0.0940

0.0075

0.0360

0.0510

0.0655

0.0870

0.3780

0.2880

0.0510

0.0720

0.0510

0.2095

0.1950

0.0075

0.4835

0.3105

0.0150

0.0075

0.0655

0.0800

0.1305

0.0075

0.0290

0.0150

0.1015

0.1510

0.2025 12987

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3(ii) ]

3 2

692 13 गोपालपुरा

694

695

581

698

580

579

578

577

576

575

565

566

570

568

563

561

555

504

506

507

517

516

514

521

513

664 14 आँवा

667

663

662

661

647

660

649

658

659

655

656

654

653

558

562

567

570

571

572

574

157 15 राजपुरा मय चक

0.0150

0.1160

0.0600

0.0040

0.0600

0.0360

0.0190

0.0100

0.0020

0.0800

0.3600

0.0720

0.0040

0.0075

0.1445

0.1305

0.1950

0.0440

0.0360

0.0075

0.4850

0.0040

0.0150

0.4975

0.3535

0.0075

0.0290

0.0020

0.0360

0.1880

0.1800

0.0510

0.0655

0.0720

0.0655

0.0040

0.4115

0.0075

0.0220

0.0075

0.1230

0.1735

0.0940

0.1305

0.0870

0.0075

0.1520

0.2675

0.0360

0.0020

0.0720

0.1235

0.0040

0.0290

0.1950

0.0655

0.1595

0.0360

0.0150

0.0360

0.1230 12988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927.

3 1

158 15 राजपुरा मय चक (जारी..)

159

161

183

181

182

180

178

179

177

176

175

193

174

197

112

198

199

200

106/253

97 16 पिसाहेड़ा

1410

659

612

606

604

618

619

623

622

624

625

626

645

644

640

639

638

637

657

638/1556

511

513

512

515

514

508

136

137

505

494

481

422

425

434

435

419

438

439

439/1572

440

415 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

0.0150

0.1230

0.2975

0.0720

0.1800

0.3420

0.0290

0.2020

0.0290

0.0075

0.1440

0.1880

0.0580

0.0040

0.1160

0.3350

0.1015

0.1550

0.2975

0.2520

0.0150

0.1160

0.1375

0.1305

0.0075

0.2745

0.2460

0.0075

0.2600

0.1735

0.0580

0.0040

0.0500

0.0580

0.1015

0.0220

0.0290

0.1090

0.1230

0.2455

0.0290

0.0020

0.0300

0.0220

0.0075

0.0150

0.0040

0.0220

0.1015

0.0290

0.0150

0.2315

0.0075

0.0360

0.2880

0.2315

0.0220

0.0580

0.1375

0.0870

0.1520

0.0220

0.2505 12989

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

3 2

411 16 पिसाहेड़ा (जारी....)

140

142

132

168 17 ढीकोली

167

178

166

165

164

154

139

140

136

135

660 18 खड़ीपुर

661

662

664

588

667

666

668

669

574

671

722

672/740

675

674

413/742

677

684

683

682

693

681

695

326

697

696

698

325

324

323

322

320

1730 19 खजूरी

1719

727

726

724

704

705

703

695

693

692

691

690

640

687

624

627 3276 G1 /05-17

0.0655

0.1800

0.2315

0.1880

0.0290

0.0020

0.0290

0.1450

0.3600

0.0510

0.3315

0.2455

0.0040

0.1590

0.0360

0.0290

0.0870

0.1440

0.0075

0.0580

0.0150

0.0075

0.1520

0.0870

0.0150

0.0290

0.0440

0.0075

0.1095

0.1015

0.3475

0.0945

0.0655

0.1305

0.0075

0:0840

0.0840

0.0290

0.0510

0.0075

0.0655

0.0075

0.0150

0.0430

0.1440

0.0510

0.0870

0.0150

0.1095

0.0870

0.1440

0.0075

0.0655

0.1160

0.0150

0.1880

0.0075

0.1880

0.0290

0.0075

0.2095

0.0150 12990

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

3 2

623 19 खाजूरी (जारी....)

622

650

608

606

609

604/1819

603

601

584

439

440

442

443

444

452

448

414

402

403

404

405

406

407

382

381

378

379

380

376

377

314

317

313

276

262

263

264

273

180

172

173

169

175

174

168

170

167

164

159

160

162

156

155

155/1830

244 20 बन्दा

0.0290

0.0220

0.1440

0.1230

0.0220

0.0510

0.0290

0.0945

0.1160

0.0510

0.0150

0.0020

0.0150

0.1305

0.0720

0.0075

0.1015

0.0945

0.0720

0.0220

0.0800

0.0150

0.0655

0.0290

0.0360

0.0875

0.0655

0.0290

0.0075

0.1015

0.0720

0.2160

0.0220

0.0075

0.0150

0.0510

0.0220

0.0150

0.0875

0.0510

0.0940

0.0040

0.0020

0.0150

0.0075

0.0510

0.0020

0.0720

0.0360

0.0075

0.0510

0.1665

0.1955

0.0290

0.0075

0.1015

0.3900

0.0945

0.0720

0.2025

0.1880

0.0360

0.0220 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ].

12991

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

3 1

230 20 बन्दा (जारी...)

224

223

225

226

227

206

207

208

218

210

1692 21 कुराड

1693

1691

1689

1685

1686

1683

1682

1680

1681

1673

1672

1668

1651

963

962

961

965

966

956

956/1927

949

733 22 बृजनगर

732

258

730

262

263

266

267

264

268

269

270

335

336

337

338

330

334

347

346

348

654

655

652 4

0.2090

0.1520

0.0510

0.1375

0.1230

0.1080

0.0150

0.1230

0.1375

0.0075

0.1800

0.0075

0.1160

0.0150

0.1015

0.2160

0.0290

0.1305

0.0510

0.0800

0.4050

0.0510

0.2815

0.0440

0.1580

0.0720

0.0360

0.1230

0.1580

0.1150

0.0290

0.0075

0.1580

0.0720

0.1800

0.1955

0.2640

0.0075

0.0290

0.1550

0.0720

0.3250

0.2880

0.1660

0.0220

0.0290

0.0020

0.3250

0.1880

0.0020

0.0220

0.0150

0.0220

0.0020

0.4260

0.0290

0.0040

0.2430

0.0720

0.0020

0.2270 [PART II--Stc . 3( ii) ] 12992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26. 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

0.0220

649

22 बृजनगर (जारी....)

0.0720

648

0.0040

653

0.0020

608

0.0800

609

0.0020

610

0.0510

611

0.0800

616

0.0720

617

0.0290

618

0.0075

619

0.1450

606

0.0360

601

0.0360

589/761

0.0360

589/760

0.0650

591

0.0220

592

0.1720

593

0.0290

589

0.1000

583

0.0720

582

0.3030

580

0.0150

579

0.0360

570

0.0150

572

0.0290

571

0.0075

511

512

0.0580

0.1080

513

0.0360

513/788

0.1300

507/789

507

0.0220

506

0.0220

[फा०सं ०आर०-31015/76/2004-ओ आंर-II ]

हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 24th November, 2005

S. O. 4432. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.2511 , dated the 7th July, 2005 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) published in the Gazette of India dated the 16th July, 2005 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying an extension pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Manglya ( Indore ) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 13 September, 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;

12993

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Andwhereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule ; appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

STATE:

DISTRICT : KOTA

TEHSIL : SANGOD

RAJASTHAN

AREA IN HECTARE

SURVEY NO.

S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE

1594

0.3325

1 DHULET

0.0940

1569

1568

0.0580

0.2025

1548

0.0220

1549

0.0150

1554

0.0075

1553

1552

0.0220

0.2025

1551

1546

0.2745

0.1700

1535

0.0290

1534

1533

0.0220

1498

0.1190

1497

1430

0.0150

पड़त

0.1800

CHARCHADIYA URF

254

0.0720

KASHIPURA

0.1160

255

0.0580

251

249

0.3465

263

0.0290

248

0.1015

264

0.1080

245

0.0150

0.2740

266

268

0.1800

270

0.1015

271

0.0360

272

0.0290

273

0.0020

0.0875

278

279

0.1305

207

0.0800

208

0.0075 12994

[PART 11 - SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

0.1095

206

2 CHARCHADIYA URF KASHIPURA

0.3030

200

(Contd...)

0.1440

199

0.0360

198

0.0360

589

3 LODHAHEDA

0.1305

589/966

0.0650

586

0.0040

587

0.0435

588

0.0075

583

0.0075

582

0.1375

581

0.0220

580

0.4320

579

0.0870

578

0.0720

577

0.0720

579/961

0.1305

576

0.0075

575

0.0220

522/967

0.0075

573

0.0040

523

0.1520

522

0.2745

519

0.0220

520

0.0220

344

0.2815

438

0.0150

425

0.1080

446

0.0290

447/963

0.1160

447

0.0290

448

0.0220

450

0.2095

421

422

0.0075

0.2315

420

0.0150

419

0.0220

418

0.0290

162/264

4 TOSYA

0.0075

162/265

0.1665

165

0.0150

166

0.3030

159

111

0.0220

0.1015

0.0720

0.2025

0.0290

106

0.0290

0.1735

0.1015

0.0150

0.0360

0.0290

0.0150

0.0020

0.0720

0.0075

0.0150

0.2095

0.0650

0.1800 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 2

19 TOSYA ( Contd ..... )

104 5 TOLYA

102

113

114

101

389 6 KESHOLI

390

391

388

396

384

382

368

370

369

363

299

301

361

303

304

311

309

312

313

970 7 BACHHIHEDA

967

12995 4

0.0075

0.1230

0.0075

0.2025

0.0220

0.0075

0.1735

0.1800

0.0075

0.0220

0.1445

0.0290

0.1230

0.0040

0.0075

0.1015

0.0870

0.0040

0.1880

0.2240

0.0040

0.3535

0.0940

0.1375

0.0360

0.0720

0.0220

0.0800

0.0720

0.0075

0.1880

0.2880

0.0870

0.0075

0.2120

0.2315

0.0075

0.0290

0.0360

0.0720

0.1520

0.2460

0.0440

0.0075

0.0360

0.2520

0.2160

0.0720

0.2520

0.0220

0.1095

0.1445

0.2020

0.1735

0.0510

0.0580

0.1520

0.1015

0.1160

0.0360

0.0435

0.0360

0.0220 12996

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

3 2

968 BACHHIHEDA

964

974

976

953

952

950

951

942

943

944

945

906

923

75 8 SAROLA

351 9 MANDUHEDA

350

347

348

349

346

340

345

329

330

319

320

322

323

324

271

301

300

299

284

286

288

290

291

532 10 HINGONIYA

543

542

541

540

539

537

519

521

539/731

518

517

516

515

466

467

468

503

481 4

0.0220

0.0150

0.2740

0.1300

0.2615

0.0070

0.0650

0.1230

0.1080

0.0360

0.0720

0.0040

0.0075

0.0150

0.0040

0.0360

0.0220

0.0040

0.2895

0.0075

0.0440

0.0435

0.0360

0.4900

0.0580

0.0720

0.0220

0.0020

0.0360

0.0720

0.1590

0.0510

0.2400

0.2520

0.0720

0.0020

0.0875

0.0150

0.0220

0.0020

0.0510

0.0655

0.0580

0.0020

0.0870

0.0945

0.0360

0.0150

0.0020

0.0650

0.1165

0.0360

0.0150

0.0075

0.0020 12997

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

3 2

482 10 HINGONIYA (Contd ....)

483

479

478

485

477

273

275

275/753

275/752

284

285

298

300

301

302

303

304

21/773

21/772

21/771

318 11 KHEDI

317

316

315

313

314

54 12 BISHANPURA

837 13 GOPALPURA

838

839

823

824/873

824

770

771

765 3276 G1/ 05-18

0.1080

0.1300

0.0020

0.0720

0.0150

0.0020

0.0440

0.1800

0.0360

0.1080

0.1735

0.3175

0.0075

0.2160

0.1080

0.2385

0.0720

0.0360

0.1160

0.3600

0.0560

0.0290

0.1375

0.1080

0.0290

0.0655

0.1375

0.0075

0.1440

0.1230

0.0720

0.0150

0.3035

0.1300

0.4470

0.0435

0.0945

0.2520

0.1590

0.0940

0.0075

0.0360

0.0510

0.0655

0.0870

0.3780

0.2880

0.0510

0.0720

0.0510

0.2095

0.1950

0.0075

0.4835

0.3105

0.0150 [PART 11 -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

12998

3 2

767 13 GOPALPURA ( Contd .... )

764

763

762

683

684

685

686

687

693

692

694

695

581

698

696

580

579

578

577

576

575

565

566

570

568

563

561

555

504

506

507

517

516

514

521

513

664 14 AANWA

667

663

662

661

647 4

0.0075

0.0655

0.0800

0.1305

0.0075

0.0290

0.0150

0.1015

0.1510

0.2025

0.0150

0.1160

0.0600

0.0040

0.0600

0.0360

0.0190

0.0100

0.0020

0.0800

0.3600

0.0720

0.0040

0.0075

0.1445

0.1305

0.1950

0.0440

0.0360

0.0075

0.4850

0.0040

0.0150

0.4975

0.3535

0.0075

0.0290

0.0020

0.0360

0.1880

0.1800

0.0510

0.0655

0.0720

0.0655

0.0040

0,4115

0.0075

0.0220

0.0075

0.1230

0.1735

0.0940

0.1305

0.0870

0.0075 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

12999

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

660 14 AANWA ( Contd ... )

649

658

659

655

656

654

653

558

562

567

570

571

572

574 15 RAJPURA MAY CHAK

157

158

159

161

183

163

181

182

180

178

179

177

176

175

193

174

197

112

198

199

200

106/253

97 16 PISAHEDA

1410

659

612

606

604

618

619

623

622

624

625

626

645

644

640

639

638

637

657

638/1556

511 4

0.1520

0.2675

0.0360

0.0020

0.0720

0.1235

0.0040

0.0290

0.1950

0.0655

0.1595

0.0360

0.0150

0.0360

0.1230

0.0150

0.1230

0.2975

0.0720

0.1800

0.3420

0.0290

0.2020

0.0290

0.0075

0.1440

0.1880

0.0580

0.0040

0.1160

0.3350

0.1015

0.1550

0.2975

0.2520

0.0150

0.1160

0.1375

0.1305

0.0075

0.2745

0.2460

0.0075

0.2600

0.1735

0.0580

0.0040

0.0500

0.0580

0.1015

0.0220

0.0290

0.1090

0.1230

0.2455

0.0290

0.0020

0.0300

0.0220 [PART 11--SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

13000

3 2

513 16 PISAHEDA (Contd ..... )

512

515

514

508

136

137

505

494

481

422

425

434

435

419

438

439

439/1572

440

415

411

140

142

132

168 17 DHIKOLI

187

178

166

165

164

154

139

140

136

135

660 18 KHADIPUR

661

662

664

588

667

666

668

669

574

671

722

672/740

675

674

413/742

677

684

683

682

693

681

695

326

697

696 4

0.0075

0.0150

0.0040

0.0220

0.1015

0.0290

0.0150

0.2315

0.0075

0.0360

0.2880

0.2315

0.0220

0.0580

0.1375

0.0870

0.1520

0.0220

0.2505

0.0655

0.1800

0.2315

0.1880

0.0290

0.0020

0.0290

0.1450

0.3600

0.0510

0.3315

0.2455

0.0040

0.1590

0.0360

0.0290

0.0870

0.1440

0.0075

0.0580

0.0150

0.0075

0.1520

0.0870

0.0150

0.0290

0.0440

0.0075

0.1095

0.1015

0.3475

0.0945

0.0655

0.1305

0.0075

0.0840

0.0290

0.0510

0.0075 [ भाग 1 ]- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

13001

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

3 2

698 18 KHADIPUR (Contd .....)

325

324

323

322

320

1730 19 KHAJURI

1719

727

726

724

704

705

703

695

693

692

691

690

640

687

624

627

623

622

650

608

606

609

604/1819

603

601

584

439

440

442

443

444

452

448

414

402

403

404

405

406

407

382

381

378

379

380

376

377

314

317

313

276

262

263 4

0.0075

0.0655

0.0075

0.0150

0.0430

0.1440

0.0510

0.0870

0.0150

0.1095

0.0870

0.1440

0.0075

0.0655

0.1160

0.0150

0.1880

0.0075

0.1880

0.0290

0.0075

0.2095

0.0150

0.0290

0.0220

0.1440

0.1230

0.0220

0.0510

0.0290

0.0945

0.1160

0.0510

0.0150

0.0020

0.0150

0.1305

0.0720

0.0075

0.1015

0.0945

0.0720

0.0220

0.0800

0.0150

0.0655

0.0290

0.0360

0.0875

0.0655

0.0290

0.0075

0.1015

0.0720

0.2160

0.0220

0.0075

0.0150

0.0510

0.0220 13002

[PART --SFC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

3 1

264 19 KHAJURI (Contd ..... )

273

180

172

173

169

175

174

168

170

167

164

159

160

162

156

155

155/1830

244 20 BANDA

230

224

223

225

226

227

206

207

208

218

210

1692 21 KURAD

1693

1691

1689

1685

1686

1683

1682

1680

1681

1673

1672

1668

1651

963

962 4

0.0150

0.0875

0.0510

0.0940

0.0040

0.0020

0.0150

0.0075

0.0510

0.0020

0.0720

0.0360

0.0075

0.0510

0.1665

0.1955

0.0290

0.0075

0.1015

0.3900

0.0945

0.0720

0.2025

0.1880

0.0360

0.0220

0.2090

0.1520

0.0510

0.1375

0.1230

0.1080

0.0150

0.1230

0.1375

0.0075

0.1800

0.0075

0.1160

0.0150

0.1015

0.2160

0.0290

0.1305

0.0510

0.0800

0.4050

0.0510

0.2815

0.0440

0.1580

0.0720

0.0360

0.1230

0.1580

0.1150

0.0290

0.0075 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

3 1

961 21 KURAD ( Contd ... )

965

966

956

956/1927

949 22 BRIJNAGAR

733

732

258

730

262

263

266

267

264

268

269

270

335

336

337

338

330

334

347

346

348

654

655

652

649

648

653

-608

609

610

611

616

617

618

619

606

601

589/761

589/760

591

592

593

589

583

582

580

579

570

572

571

511

512

513

513/788

507/789

507

506

13003 4

0.0075

0.1580

0.0720

0.1800

0.1955

0.2640

0.0075

0.0290

0.1550

0.0720

0.3250

0.2880

0.1660

0.0220

0.0290

0.0020

0.3250

0.1880

0.0020

0.0220

0.0150

0.0220

0.0020

0.4260

0.0290

0.0040

0.2430

0.0720

0.0020

0.2270

0.0220

0.0720

0.0040

0.0020

0.0800

0.0020

0.0510

0.0800

0.0720

0.0290

0.0075

0.1450

0.0360

0,0650

0.0220

0.1720

0.0290

0.1000

0.0720

0.3030

0.0150

0.0360

0.0150

0.0290

0.0075

0.0580

0.1080

0.0360

0.1300

0.0220

[F.N. R- 31015/ 76/2004-OR-II] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secretary [PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

13004

नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4433.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैसे मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1995 तारीख 01 जून , 2005 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 04 जून , 2005 , में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मुन्द्रा -दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 17 जुलाई , 2005 , को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पत्र सं. आर 31015/7/03 ओ.आर- दिनांक 25/11/2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शर्तों के अध्यधीन सभी विल्लंगों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

13005

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

अनुसूची

जिला: सिरोही तहसील: पिण्डवाड़ा

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

3 1. कासिन्दा

159

109

232

239

245

261/497

261/1

389/471

375/437

375मिन 0

359 (स.रास्ता)

357

356

355

348

361 (स.नाला)

362मिन 01 (ग्रा . पं . चारागाह)

362/429 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)

303 2. अचपुरा

304मिन

290मिन

290/1

290/2

290/3

290/4 3. सांगवाडा

355 (स.भूमि)

355मिन

356/1

356(स.भूमि)

373/1

33.0 (स. भूमि)

142

135

166(स. रास्ता)

28 3276 GI /05-19

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

01 .

9.1

。

}

00 13006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

तहसील : पिण्डवाड़ा

जिला: सिरोही क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

27 3. सांगवाडा (जारी...)

26 4. फुलाबाईखेड़ा

589

588

539

462/2

460

458 5. काछोोली

831

834

836

674

675

665

647(स.रास्ता)

548

546

544

542

543

537

669(स.नदी)

845(स.नदी) 6. पातुम्बरी

94(स.नदी)

114

104

151

154(स.मगरी)

155(स .मगरी)

162

12 7. भावरी

623

436

432

785(सं. रास्ता)

806

816

826

829 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)

[ PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

45 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

13007

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

तहसील: पिण्डवाड़ा

जिला : सिरोही क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

1017मिन 01 7. भावरी (जारी...)

1018 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

ख.सं . 1053 और 1063 के बीच

1054

1069

1070

1074 8. धनारी

1529

1535

1542

1444

1415

1416

1417

1420

1692

1704

1703

1719

605

462

446 0

72.

04 42

435(सिं.वि.)

436

366

367

364

363

362

360

377

384

380 0

205(ग्रा.पं. चारागाह)

9. कोदरला

509

474 0

474मिन 01 (स.भूमि)

474मिन02

474मिन 03

474मिन 04

13008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

[ PART II-- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

जिला: सिरोही

तहसील: पिण्डवाड़ा

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 2

441

32 9. कोदरला (जारी... )

307

297

01 10. रामपुरा

130

130/1

}

187

191

197

71मिन 01

70मिन 01

239

295

11. डूंगरी

297(स.नाला)

281

171

172

9.2

90/2

90/3

83(गा.पं. चारागाह)

12. बसंतगढ़

1400

1393

1392

1369

78 13. चवरली

414(ग्ग्र.पं.चारागाह)

{

404(ग्ग्र.पं.चारागाह)

410

409

379

381

383

384.

ख.सं .385 और 272 के बीच

272(स.खड्डा/रास्ता)

283

286

304

68 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

13009

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

जिला: सिरोही

तहसील : पिण्डवाड़ा

क्रम सं.

खसरा सं..

गाँव का नाम

314 13. चवरली (जारी ... )

राज्य: राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

219(स.मगरी)

211 14. अजारी

566

573

494

491

490

478

474

394

392

407

309

311

314

2.98

322

320

290(स.नदी)

2.89(स.रास्ता)

266

262

257

256

248

249

250

251

252

211

210

209

200

199

808

3386 15. पिण्डवाड़ा

3387

3411

3415 0

0 13010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927 [ PART 11 - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] तहसील : पिण्डवाड़ा

जिला : सिरोही

राज्य: राजस्थान الي

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

3518

64 15. पिण्डवाड़ा (जारी ... )

3505 (स. रास्ता)

3591

3638

3633

3628

3274

3280

3758

891

911/1

911मिन 01

1061

1062

1065

1078

1091

68.

1092

1215

1250

586(स.भूमि)

1259

87 (न.पा. चारागाह)

[ फा. सं. आर-31015/46/2004- ओ.आर- ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th November, 2005

S. O. 4433. Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1995 dated the 01st June , 2005 , issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ), published in the Gazette of India dated the 04th June , 2005 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the State of Gujarat to Delhi through Mundra-Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 17th July; 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

13011 And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of publication of declaration , in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances , subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter no . R- 31015/7/03 , QR- II dated 25-11-2004.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : PINDWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

District : SIROHI

Khasara No. Sr. No Name of the Village

1. KASINDRA

159

109

232

239

245

261/497

261/1

389/471

375/437 Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

03 60

00 82

01 46

375Min01

16 68

00 82

359 (G /L Cart Track)

357

356

355

348

00 29

361(G/L Nala)

362Min01 ( G / P Pasture)

03 31

362/429 ( P.W.D.Road ) S

2. ACHPURA

303

304Min

200min

200/1

290/2

200/3

200/4

0 13012

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

Tehsil : PINDWARA

District : SIROHI

Khasara- No .

Sr. No Name of the Village

3. SANGWARA

355(G/L)

355Min

356/1

356(G/L)

373/1

330(G/L)

142

135

166( G/ L Cart Track)

589 4. PHULABAI KHEDA

588

539

462/2

460

458

83.1 5. KACHHOLI

834

836

674

675

665

647(G /L Cart Track)

548

546

544

542

543

537

669(G/L River)

845(G/ L River ) 6. PATUMBARI

+94(G/L River)

114

104

151

154(G/LMagri )

155(G/ L Magri )

162 State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 4

00 68

00 73 73

26 55

16 92

09 53

0 13013

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : RAJASTHAN

District: SIROHI

Tehsil : PINDWARA

Khasara No. Name of the Village

Sr. No

39 C. PATUMBARI (Contd... )

623 7. BHAVRI

436

432 Area

Sq.mtr.

Are

Hectare

785(G /L Cart Track)

806

816

826

829(P.W.D . Road)

00 72

1017Min01

1018

In Bet Svy No. 1053 & 1063

1054

1069

1070

1074

1529 8. DHANARI

1535

1542

1444

1415

1416

1417

1420

1692

1704

1703

1719

605

462

446

00 20

00 88

00 80

435(Irrig . Deptt . )

436

366

367

364

363

362

360

377

384

380

205 (G/P Pasture )

3276G1 /05-20

0 13014

[PAINT 11-Sec. 3 )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

Tehsil : PINDWARA

District : SIROHI

Khasara No. Sr. No

Name of the Village

3 1

9. KODARLA

509

474

474Min01 (G/L)

474Min02

474Min03

474Min04

441

307

297

130 10. RAMPURA

130/1

187

191

197

71Min01

70Min01

239

295 11. DUNGRI

297(G/L Nala)

281

171

172

90/2

90/3

83(G/P Pasture)

1400 12. BASANTGARH

1393

1392

1369 13. CHAVARLI

414(G/P Pasture)

404(G /P Pasture)

410

409

379

381

383

384

In Bet Svy No.385 & 272

272(G /L Khadda/Cart Track)

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

02 14

01 0

。

}

88 0

91 0

70 0

85 0

93 0

95 0

75 0

21 0

05 0

92 0

10 0

84 0

20 0

34 0

00 48

04 0

15 0

63 0

78 1

}

27 0

34 0

58 0

29 0

37 0

08 0

48 13015

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Tehsil : PINDWARA

District : SIROHI

Khasara No. Sr. No

Name of the Village

3 1

283 13. CHAVARLI ( Contd ... )

286

304

314 State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 4

68 0

01 01 01

219(G/L Magri )

211

566 14. AJARI

573

494

491

490

478

474

394

392

407

309

311

314

298

322

320

57 0

00 55 0

54 0

33 0

12 08

02 88 0

60 0

91 0

290(G/L River)

289(G /L Cart Track)

266

262

257

256

248

249

250

251

252

211

210

209

200

199

808

3386 15. PINDWARA

3387

3411

3415

16 0

30 0

44 0

40 0

82 0

03 0

03 20 0

13 0

04 0

00 20 0

00 97 0

00 76

00 51 0

88 13016

[ PART 11 - SEC 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

Tehsil : PINDWARA

State : RAJASTHAN

District : SIROHI

Khasara No. Sr. No

Name of the Village

3 1

3518 15. PINDWARA ( Contd ... )

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

46 0

3505 ( G /L Cart Track)

3591

3638

3633

3628

3274

3280

3758

891

911/1 0

28 0

64 0

91 0

74 0

01 13 سلم

911Min01

1061

1062

1065

1078

1091

1092

1215

1250

586(G/L)

1259

52 0

05 92

57 0

68 0

46 0

21 0

62 0

87( N / P Pasture)

[No. R-31015/46/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4434.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाएँ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

13017

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, डी-7 लालबहादुर नगर ( पूर्व ) , क्लार्क्स आमेर होटल के सामने, जवाहरलाल नेहरु मार्ग, मालवीय नगर, जयपुर-302017 (राजस्थान ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य राजस्थान

जिला : सिरोही

तहसील : पिण्डदाड़ा

क्षेत्रफल

मीटर

वर्ग

एयर

हेक्टेयर

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

261/495

1. कासिन्दा

339/483

457

2. कोदरला

458

554/223

3. रामपुरा

3409

4. पिण्डवाड़ा

3410

3413

3416

3417

3457

3462

3601

3618

3641

3640

3647

3633

3646

3645

3596/3831

[फा. सं. आर-31015/46/2004- ओ. आर- ।॥ ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 13018

[PART 11 - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26,2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the 25th November, 2005

S. O. 4434.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the rightof user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule , may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority. Mundra- Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, D- 7 . Lal Bahadur Nagar ( East ) . Opp . Clarks Amer Hotel , Jawaharlal Nehru Marg . Malviya Nagar, Jaipur - 302017 ( Rajasthan )

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : PINDWARA

District: SIROHI

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr. No

Khasara No.

Hectare

Name of the Village

Are Sq.mtr .

1. KASINDRA

261/495

389/483

2. KODARLA

457

458

3. RAMPURA

554/223

4. PINDWARA

3409

3410

3413

09 93

3416

05 96

3417

3457

3462

85 13019 [ भाग ।। खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

3601

20 4. PINDWARACcontci...)

3618

3641

3640

3647

03 49

3633

3646

3645

3596/3831

09 90

[No. R-31015/46/2004-O.R. - IIJ HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का. ऑ. 4435.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957, ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त् अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उक्त अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र का प्लान सं. एन.टी.पी.सी./एफ.एम.- सी.एम / 05 / माईन /001 दिनाँक 10 जून, 2005 का निरीक्षण अपर महा प्रबंधक(आई./सी) ईंधन प्रबंध- कोयला खनन, एन टी पी सी प्रथम तल नेशनल फर्टिलाइजर लिमिटेड बिल्डिंग ए-11 , सैक्टर-24 , नौएडा, उत्तर प्रदेश 201301 या मुख्य महाप्रबंधक (खोज विभाग) , सेंट्रल माइन्स प्लानिंग एंड डिजाइन इंस्टीच्यूट, गोंडवाना प्लेस , कांके रोड, रांची या कोयला नियंत्रक 1 , काउन्सिल हाउस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता अथवा कलेक्टर, जिला हजारीबाग , झारखण्ड के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि मे हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 उपधारा (7 ) में निदिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चार्टों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर अपर महाप्रबंधक ( आई/ सी) ईंधन प्रबंध; एन टी पी सी, एन एफ एल बिल्डिंग, सैक्टर-24, नौएडा, उत्तर प्रदेश-201301 को भेजेंगे । [PART 11--- SEC . 3( ii ) ] 13020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26. 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

अनुसूची

पाकरी बरवाडीह कोयला ब्लाक, जिला हजारीबाग, झारखण्ड

प्लान सं ० एन टी पी सी/ एफ एम सी एम /05 /माईन / 001 दिनांक 10 जून , 2005

टिप्पणी

थाना नं. जिला

थाना

ग्राम का नाम

क्र.स.

क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेअर)

क्षेत्रफल (एकड़)

भाग

153.6.

हजारीबाग

केरादारी

कंदावेर

215.04

38 हजारीबाग

केरादारी

पूर्ण देवरिया कलाँ

321

भाग

793.6

बरकागाँव

41 हजारीबाग

उरूबे

176

भाग

435.20

हजारीबाग

केरादारी 42

बरीयातु

10.24

भाग केरादारी

43 हजारीबाग

झबरा

138.24

हजारीबाग

केरादारी

पूर्ण देवरीया खुर्द

140.8

44 हजारीबाग

केरादारी

पूर्ण 7

बशरीया

148.48

भाग

हजारीबाग

केरादारी

नवाडी

128

हजारीबाग

भाग सिरमा

केरादारी

भाग

120.32

हजारीबाग

केरादारी

लितिज

234

578.56

भाग

बरकागाँव

चिरूडी

हजारीबाग

218

537.6

भाग

बरकागाँव

हजारीबाग

नगाडी

282

भाग

696.22

बरकागाँव

हजारीबाग

दादीकलान

780.8

316

भाग

हजारीबाग

बरकागाँव 52

चेपाकलान

245.75

99.38

पूर्ण 15

बरकागाँव 53

हजारीबाग

चेपाखुर्द

169.62

बरकागाँव

419.76.

हजारीबाग

पूर्ण जुगरा

732.24

296.45

भाग बरकागाँव 55

अरहरा

हजारीबाग

259

भाग

640

हजारीबाग

बरकागाँव 56

पाकरी बरबाडी

192

भाग

बरकागाँव

हजारीबाग

बड़कागाँव

389

भाग

960

बरकागाँव 58

हजारीबाग

लंगातू

486.4

197

हजारीबाग

बरकागाँव 59

सोनबर्षा

पूर्ण

109

268.8

हजारीबाग

बरकागाँव 60

पूर्ण सिदुवरी

145

बरकागाँव

358.4

हजारीबाग

पूर्ण चुरचु

भाग

197

486.4

हजारीबाग

केरी

बरकागाँव

भाग

15.36

127 हजारीबाग

बरकागाँव

डेंगा

भाग

202

499.2

हजारीबाग

128

बरकागाँव

लकुरा

भाग

51.2

हजारीबाग

129

बरकागाँव

चंदौल

भाग

130

12.8

हजारीबाग

बरकागाँव

पंडौल

10245.01

4147.52

कुल 13021

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

सीमा वर्णनः-

क ख : रेखा, ग्राम कंदावेर में बिंदु ' क' से आरंभ होकर ग्राम अरहारा के बिंदु ' ख " में मिलती है ,

यह रेखा ग्राम पाकरी बरबाडी के पूर्वी भाग से होकर जाती है ,

ख - ग :

ग -घ -घ : यह रेखा ग्राम पाकरी बरबवाडी और ग्राम लकुरा के उत्तर पूर्वी भाग से होकर जाती है ,

यह रेखा ग्राम लकुरा और ग्राम बडकागाँव के दक्षिणी भाग से होकर जाती है । घड. :

ड.- च : यह रेखा ग्राम बडकागॉव, ग्राम लंगातू, केरी एवं देवरिया कलान के दक्षिणी भाग से होकर जाती है ।

च-छ: यह रेखा ग्राम केरी के पश्चिमी भाग और ग्राम देवरीकलान के दक्षिणी भाग से होकर जाती है ।

छ-कः यह रेखा ग्राम देंवरी कलान और ग्राम बेलतु के पश्चिमी भाग और ग्राम पाण्डेयपुरा खुर्द, बरियातु और झबरा के पूर्वी भाग से होकर जाती है ।

[फा. सं.-43015/7/2005 - पी. आर. आई. डब्ल्यू. ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S. O. 4435. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition & Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal from the lands specified in the said Schedule .

2. The plan no . NTPC /FM - CM/ 05 / MIN/001 dated the 10th June , 2005 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected at the office of the Additional General Manager ( I/ c ) Fuel Management - Coal Mining , NTPC , 1st Floor , National Fertilizer Limited Building ,A- 11 ; Sector- 24, NOIDA , Uttar Pradesh -201301 or at the office of Chief General Manager ( Exploration Division ) , Central Mine Planning & Design Institute , Gondwana Place , Kanke Road , Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Controller , 1 Council House Street , Kolkata or at the office of the District Collector , District Hazaribagh , Jharkhand.

3276 Gl/05-21 13022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 / AGRAHA YANA 5 , 1927

[ PART 11---SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 3. All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , Chart and other documents referred in sub section (7) of section 13 of the said Act to the Additional General Manager ( I/ c) , Fuel Management - Coal Mining , NTPC , NFL Building , Sector -24, NOIDA, Uttar Pradesh - 201301 within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification.

SCHEDULE

Pakri Barwadih Coal Block District Hazaribagh , Jharkhand .

Pian no . NTPC / FM - CM/ 05 / MIN / 001 dt.10th June, 2005.

Thana

S.No. Village

Thana No. 1.

Keradari

Kandaber

District

Remarks

Area (acres)

Area (hectares)

153.6

Part

33 Hazaribagh

Keradari

Devariakalan

41 Urube

Barkagoun

Keradari

Bariatu

42 5. Jhabra

Keradari

43 6.

39 Devariakhurd Keradari

7. Basaria

Keradari

215.04

87 Full

Hazaribagh

793.6

321 Part

Hazaribagh

176

435.20

Part

Hazaribagh

10.24

Part

Hazaribagh

138.24

Full

Hazaribagh

140.8

Full

Hazaribagh

Keradari

Nawadih

Keradari

Sirma

Keradari

47 10 . Lttiz

11. Chirudih

Barkagoun 48 12 Nagadi

Barkagoun 49 13.

51 Dadikalan

Barkagoun

14. Chepakalan

148.48

60 Part

Hazaribagh

128

Part

Hazaribagh

120.32

Part

Hazaribagh

578.56

234 Part

Hazaribagh

537.6

Hazaribagh

218 Part

696.22

282 Part

Hazaribagh

780.8

316 Part

52 Hazaribagh

Barkagoun

15.

53 Chepakurd Barkagoun

99.38 Full

Hazaribagh 245.75

16.

54 Jugra

Barkagoun

17. Arahara

Barkagoun 55 18. Pakri Barwadih Barkagoun 56

57 19. Barkagoan Barkagoun

58 20. Lagantu

Barkagoun

21. Sonbarsa

Barkagoun 59 22. Sinduvari

Barkagoun 60 23. Churchu

Barkagoun 61 24. Keri

Barkagoun 62 25. Denga

Barkagoun 127 26. Lakura

Barkagoun 128 27. Chandaul

Barkagoun 129

130 28. Pundaul

Barkagoun

TOTAL

Boundary description : -

169.62 Full

419.76

Hazaribagh

732.24

296.45 Part

Hazaribagh

640

259

Part

Hazaribagh

192

Part

Hazaribagh

960

389 Part

Hazaribagh

486.4

197 Full

Hazaribagh

268.8

109

Full

Hazaribagh

358.4

145 Full

Hazaribagh

486.4

197 Part

Hazaribagh

15.36

Part

Hazaribagh

202 Part

499.2

Hazaribagh

51.2

Part

Hazaribagh

12.8

Part

Hazaribagh

10245.01

4147.52

A- B: The line starting at point ' A ' in village Kandaber and meeting at point ' B ' in village Arahara .

B-C: The line passes through the Eastern part of village Pakri Barwadih .

The line passes through the North Eastern part of village Pakri Barwadih & Lakura .

C-D: D-E: The line passes through Southern part of villages Lakura & Barkagoun.

E -F: The line passes through Southern part of Villages Barkagoun , Langatu , Keri & Deoria Kalan .

The line passes through the western part of village Keri & Southern part of village Deori Kalan .

F-G:

G-A: The line passes through the western part of villages Deori Kalan & Beltu & Eastern part of the villages Pandepura Khurd, Bariatu & Jhabra .

[No. 43015/7/2005- PRIW] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4436. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार न्यू इण्डिया एश्योरेंस कं. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 4/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-17012/22/2004- आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 27th October , 2005 S.O. 4436. In pursuance of Section 17 of De Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 04/2005 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of New India Assurance Company Limited, New Delhi and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 27-10-2005 .

[No. L- 17012/22/2004- IR (B- I) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT:

SHRIKANT SHUKLA: Presiding Officer

LD . No : 4/2005

Ref . No. L- 17012/22 /2004- IR (B - I) dated: 20-12-2004

BETWEEN

Shri Ram Pher Pal S/ o Sh . Ram Khelawan Pal ,

Village and P.O.--Rampur Gauri ,

Distt. Pratapgarh (U. P. )

AND

1. The Divisional Manager,

New India Assurance Company Limited,

Divisional Office, 9th Floor, Indira Bhawan, Civil Lines , Allanabad.

2. The Branch Manager New India Assurance Company Limited, Branch Office, Raja Pratap Bahadur Park, Pratapgarh (U.P ) .

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

13023

AWARD

TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour vide their order No. L- 17012/ 22/2004 - IR(B- I) dated: 20-12-2004 has referred following dispute for adjudication to the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Lucknow for adjudication.

"Whether the action of the management of New India Assurance Company Ltd. in terminating the services of Sh. Ram Pher Pal w.e.f. 29-5-2002 is legal and justified? If not, towhat relief the workman is entitled for ? " Itisadmitted fact of the parties that Ram Pher Pal performed his duties from 7-6-99 to 28-5-2002 as a daily wager.

The case of the worker , Ram Pher Pal is that the worker was appointed in the department of the opposite party on the post of waterman and accordingly performed his duties continuously as daily wager . It alleged that on 29-5-2002 his services were orally terminated, without any notice , Notice pay or retrenchment compensation . The worker several times met authorities personally and talked about his service . The authority assured him for reinstatement but reinstatement has not been done . The worker on 1-12-2003 submitted his representation for reinstatement in the service but representation has not been considered by the management . The worker has , therefore, prayed to direct the management to reinstate him in service on the post of waterman and regularise his services . He has also prayed to direct the management to pay salary of the worker w.e.f. 29-5-2002 till the disposal of the case with 18 % interest .

The opposite party has filed the written statement disputing the claim statement of the worker. It is alleged that the workman was intermittently engaged on a purely dailywage basis , for work of casual nature as and when it arose. It is categorically alleged that the worker was hired oncontract basis for storage and supply of drinking water to the staff and employee of the branch . The worker was paid wages on daily basis in accordance with the number ofdays he worked . The worker was never appointed as a regular employee of the company, and his services were of purely temporary nature and hired on daily wage basis . The management has denied that worker was ever. appointed as regular employee of the company as such no question of termination of services arose. There was no occasion of giving of any show cause notice as the worker was engaged for casual work on daily wage basis , as and when the work arose. The management of the opposite party has also denied that no assurance for reinstatement was ever given to the workman. It is submitted that services ofthe workman are not liable to be regularised, since he was not appointed on a sanctioned post , also because no such vacancy exists and lastly because his engagement was of a purely casual nature . Therefore, it is prayed by the opposite party that claim statement is liable to be dismissed.

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

13024

Theworker has field the rejoinder. The worker has admitted that he was appointed as daily wager and his working nature was for supply of the water as a peon . He also stated that work and post of peon exists with the opposite party. The worker has reiterated that he continuously worked since 7-6-1999 to 28-5-2002.

The worker has filed following documents:

1.Photo stat copy of letter of ALC ( C ) addressed to the opposite party and the worker dated 15-1-2004.

2.Photo stat copy of letter of ALC( C ) , Allahabad addressed to Govt. of India dtd. 2-6-2004.

3.Photo stat copy of reference order dtd. 20-12-2004.

4.Photo stat copy of payment of vouchers/cheques from 30-6-99 to 28-5-2002 .

The opposite party has field photo stat copy of payment voucher and disbursement vouchers of one year preceding the date of termination from June, 2001 toMay, 2002.

The worker has examined himself as witness and he has been cross examined by the opposite party. The opposite party has examined Branch Manager, Sh. Anil Kumar Agarwal and worker availed the opportunity of cross-examining him.

The worker has not turned up for argument and therefore , heard the arguments of the representative ofthe opposite party.

Learned representative of opposite party has argued that the worker, Ram Pher Pal is not regularly appointed employee of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. It is argued that hewas a casual worker and was intermittently engaged during the period and in none of the years the worker has completed 240 days . It was the duty of the worker to prove that he worked 240 days continuously in a calendar year presenting his date oftermination.

Section 25 B of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 define the term continuous services . It is reproduced below:

"25B. Definition of continuous service - For the purposes of this Chapter:-

(1) aworkman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in uninterrupted service , including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorised leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman;

(2) where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause ( 1 ) for a period ofone year or six months , he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer-

(a) for a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made , has actuallyworked under the employer for not less than- (1) one hundred and ninety days in the case ofa workman employed below ground in a mine; and

(ii ) two hundred and forty days , in any other case;

(b) for a period of six months , if the workman , during a period of six calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation to be made , has actually worked under the employer for not less than- (i) ninety- five days , in the case of workman employed below ground in a mine ; and (ii) one hundred and twenty days , in any other case."

Inthe present case Section 25 B ( 2 ) (ii ) is attracted . Section 25 F provides the protection to the worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer . Meaning thereby that the worker has to prove that he has been in continuous service for not less than one year and he has to prove that he has worked 240 days . The worker has filed list of his working days , which by itself shows that he did not worked continuously for 240 days in any year.

The witness of opposite party, Shri Anil Kumar Agarwal , Branch Manager has categorically replied to the question of the Presiding Officer ofthe Court, detailing the working days of the worker right from 7-6-99 to 28-5-2002. The details are as under:

230days

1.7-6-99 to 27-5-2000

236 days

2.28-5-2000 to 27-5-2001

220 days

3.28-5-2001 to 28-5-2002

The worker has not cross -examined the Branch Manager on the above point.

The representative of the opposite party has field photo copies of following case laws:

1 (2004) 8 Supreme Court Cases 195 Municipal Corporations , Faridabad v. Siri Niwas .

2 (2002) 8 Supreme Court Cases 400 Essen Deinki v. Rajiv Kumar.

3 (2004) 8 Supreme Court Cases 161 Rajasthan State Ganganagar S. Mills Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan and another .

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the first case law cited above has written that provisions of the evidence Act , 1872 per se are not applicable in an industrial adjudication. The burden of proof was on the workman herein to show that he had worked for 240 days in the preceding twelve months prior to his alleged retrenchment. The relevant 13025 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

cannot be regarded as sufficient evidence.

extracts of para 13 and 14 of the first case law are reproduced below:

"13. The provisions of the Evidence Act , 1972 per se are not applicable in an industrial adjudication . The general principles of it are, however , applicable . It is also imperative for the Industrial Tribunal to see that the principles of natural justice are complied with. The burden of proof was on the respondent workman hereinto show that he had worked for 240 days in the preceding twelve months prior to his alleged retrenchment . In terms of Section 25 -F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an order retrenching a workman would not be effective unless the conditions precedent therefore are satisfied . Section 25 - F postulates the following conditions tobe fulfilled by an employer for effecting a valid retrenchment:

(i) one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment or wages in lieu thereof;

The representative ofthe opposite party has arqued that the workman has mischieviously shown the work performed by one Sunder for 10 days in his account of working and has also filed the photostate copy ofcheque , paperNo. 15/35 . The management has filed photostat copy ofvoucher of Snder along with the disbursement voucher on the basis ofwhich cheque No. 824472 was prepared in the name of Sunder . Sh Anil Kumar Agarwal has stated specifically that worker; Ram Pher Pal did not work in April, 2002. From the evidence on record it is proved that worker has not worked for 240 days preceding his date of termination. In the light case laws cited by the opposite party, I come to the conclusion that the termination order though oral does not suffer from any illegality. I also come to the conclusion that the worker has fraudulently produced the cheque of Sh . Sunder to substantiate his working days . Theworker'sevidence is therefore , not creditworthy. From the discussion above , I come to the conclusion that the worker has miserably failed to prove the action of the management of oral termination ofthe service ofthe worker , Ram Pher Pal , daily worker, was illegal and unjustified. The result is that worker is not entitled to any relief. The issue is answered against the worker.

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer (ii) payment ofcompensation equivalent to fifteen days , average pay for every completed year of continuous service or any part thereof in excess ofsix months .

Lucknow 13-10-2005

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4437.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हरियाणा मिनरल्स लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चण्डीगढ़ संख्या -1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 29/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-29012/133/1998- आई आर ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th October, 2005 14. For the said purpose it is necessary to notice the definition of " continuous service " as contained in Section 25 - B of the Act. In terms of sub - section (2 ) of Section 25 - B if a workman during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made , has actually worked under the employer for 240 days within a period ofone year, he will be deemed to be in continuous service. By reason of the said provision , thus , a legal fiction is created. The retrenchment of the respondent took place on 17-5-1995 . For the purpose of calculating as to whether he had worked few a period 240 days within one year or not, it was , therefore, necessary for the Tiubunal to arrive at a finding of fact that during the period between 5-8-1994 to 16-5-1995 he had worked for a period of more than 240 days . "

S.O. 4437. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 29/99 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Cum- Labour Court , Chandigarh No. I as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Haryana Minerals Ltd. , Arunachal Building, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-2005 .

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in second case law cited above has held that where 240 days ' continuous service admittedly not completed because ofparticipation in a strike on 240th day, compliance with Section 25 -F not required and termination of worker's service was valid . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further held that burden of proving continuous service of 240 days lies on the employee .

[No. L-29012/ 133 / 1998 - IR (M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

The third case law cited above also laid down that it was for the claimant workman to show that he had in fact worked for 240 days in the year preceding his termination . Amere statement in this regard on the part of the workman 13026

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I D. 29/99

Applicant V& P. O. Anangpur, Faridabad Sh. Sunder Pal S/o Sh . Attar Singh

Versus

Haryana Minerals Lid . The Managing Director , Arunanchal Building, 7th Floor, 703-704, 17 , Barakhamba Road, New Delhi . Respondent APPEARANCES :

For theworkman

: None.

: Shri Ashwani Kumar For the management

AWARD

Passed on 19-10-2005

CentralGovernment vide No. L - 29012/ 133/98 - IR-(M) dated 18th of January, 1999 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Haryana Minerals Ltd. in terminating the service of Shri Sunder Pal Bill Clerk w.e.f. 17-1-95 isjust and legal ? If not , towhat relief the concerned workman is entitled to?"

2. Shri Ashwani Kumar Bura Advocate made a statement that that advocate of the management of Shri Rameshwar Malik has been appointed as Additional Advocate General , Haryana and establishment of the management is also not functioning . He submitted that there is no whereabout of the workman . He submitted that on instructions from his senior , no useful purpose would be served in keeping this case pending as none is appearing onbehalf of the workman also . He submitted that the court may pass the necessary orders . In view of the above my earlier orders . I found that workman is not appearing since 5-1-05 despite issuance of notices . As it appears that workman is not interested in prosecuting his case because the management is also not functioning and is being closed therefore , the workman is also not coming on earlier dates . No useful purpose would be served in keeping this case pending as it appears that workman is also not interested in prosecuting this reference . In view of the above , the present reference is returned to the Central Government of want ofprosecution . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Chandigarh 19-10-2005

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4438.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की वारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं०-2, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 135/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/127/2002- आई आर ( बी. II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th October, 2005

S.O. 4438.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 135/ 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum- Labour Court No. 2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 27-10-2005 .

[No. L- 12012/ 127/ 2002 - IR (B - II)

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT - II, NEW DELHI

I.D. No. 135/2003 Presiding Officer : R.N. Rai

In the Matter of:-

Md. IrfanKhan,

T-41 /C- 1 , Jamia Nagar, Okhla, NewDelhi - 110025 .

Versus

The General Manager,

Bank of India, Zonal Office , Northern Zone, Jeevan Bharti , Level -5 , Tower 124 , Connaught Place, New Delhi- 110001.

AWARD

TheMinistry ofLabour by its letter No. L - 12012/ 127/ 2002/ ( IR B - II ) Central Government Dt . 14-08-2003 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :--

"Whether the designation given by the Bank Management as a Consultant Site Engineer is a workman? if yes (2) whether the action of the Bank of India management in terminating the services of Shri Md . Irfan Khan w.e.f. 01-05-2001 without notice isjust fair and legal ? If not, what relief he is entitlted to."

Theworkman applicant has filed claim statement. In the claim statement it has been stated that as per the first appointment letter, the period of employment of the workman purported to be only for five months . However, despite the expiry of the period offive months , the workman continued to be in service of the management . The 13027 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

requirement of payment of the retrenchment compensation. It is stated that the case of the termination of the workman is not covered under Section 2 ( oo) (bb) of the ID Act, 1947 , inter alia for the reasons that even the purported letters of fresh appointment were in fact onlyunfair labour practice and nothing else as even during the period between the alleged expiry of contract, and issuance of fresh contract , the workman throughout continued to work as per the directions of the management and for which the management continued to pay wages . As such , this is not a case fixed -term employment . Prior to 01-05-2001 , the workman has worked continuously for period of 240 days in a calendar year and as such the termination of the workman is non -est .

management continued to take work from the workman and in lieu of the work, the workman continued to be paid wages onthe same terms . At this stage , the workman was working on a site of the management situated at 4, Parliament Street , NewDelhi - 110001 . The workman continued to work without any break in service continuously till 23-04-1997 . In terms ofthe aforesaid appointment letter the workman was entitled to be paid consolidated amount of Rs. 4,850 . This salary continuedtobepaid to the workman till 31-03-1997. For the month of April , 1997 , the salary payable to the workman was due to be paid at the end of April or in the beginning of May, 1997. In the meantime on 23-04-1997 , the workman was called by the managers of the management and was told that the workman would henceforth work on another site of the Bank situated at Sector 62, Plot No. 32B , Noida (UP) . On the same day, the workman was given a fresh appointment letter dated 23-04-1997 . This time the period of employment was stated to be for 15 months and the workman was to be paid a consolidated salary of Rs . 6,000 per month. Copyofthe letter dated 23-04-1997 is annexed as Annexure-C.

The management has filed written statement. In the written statement it is stated that the applicant Shri Mohammed Irfan Khan was only a consultant " site engineer" engaged for a specific period for renovation of the branch of the bank at Parliament Street . The engagement of the claimant was only on contractual basis for the day to day supervision of the construction work of the renovation project . The claimant was paid a sum of Rs. 4, 850 per month and this arrangement was purely contractual as is evident from the letter dated 22-02-1996 issued to him.

Pursuant to the said letter, which was not actually the appointment letter but was in fact a letter only of transfer . The workman complied with the same and started working on the site at Noida. The workman continued to work on the site, as directed in an honest and deligent manner . Even after the expiry of the purported period of 15 months , the workman continued to perform work for the management and in lieu thereof the workman continued to receive wages @Rs. 6,000 per month upto 29-02-2000.

On 29-02-2000 , the workman was issued another letter dated 29-02-2000 again purporting to be an appointment letter as a temporary consultant Site Engineer. The said letter was nothing but a malafide attempt of the Bank to commitunfair labour practice . By the said letter, the workman wasdirected to continue working at the site of the Bank situated at Noida and the consolidated wages of the workman were fixed at Rs. 7,000 per month . The said letter purported to be again a time bound appointment for a period of 12 months commencing from 29-02-2000 . Acopy of the letter dated 29-02-2000 is annexed as Annexure-D .

That thereafter there was some fresh construction activity for the bank for the staff Training College at Noida (UP) and the services of the claimant were once again taken purely on contractual basis for the purposes of supervision of construction activity of the bank's Training Centrebeing set up at Noida. This service of the claimant were taken on contractual basis w.e.f. 24-04-1997 against payment of supervision charges amounting to Rs.6 , 000 per month . Consequent upon the conclusion of the construction activity of the Staff Training College at Noida and on completion of the Project, the contract of supervision given to him came to an end in March, 2001 . The services of the claimant were engaged purely on contractual basis and hence there could be no termination ofservice as alleged. The claimant is also not a " workman " as defined u/ s 2 (s) of the ID Act , 1947 and as such the present reference is not maintainable before this Hon'ble Tribunal . The consultancy arrangement would not result in creating an employer -employee relationship. It is well known that employment in any Public Sector bank is given after following the settled procedures . That the present dispute could not be an " Industrial Dispute " within the meaning of section 2 ( k) of the Industrial Dispute Act .

The period of 12 month commencing from 29-02-2000 ended on 29-02-2001 . However , as per past practice , the management continued to take work from the workman and the workman continued to discharge his duties for which the management paid due wages . However, even though the workman continued to work till 30-04-2001 . The management has not paid wages for the month of April , 2001. The management illegally terminated the services of the workman on and from 01-05-2001 without any written communication and only on verbal and oral instructions .

The case was fixed on 30-08-2004 for filing rejoinder but rejoinder was not filed. The workman was absent on 04-05-2004 and 9-02-2005 and 27-04-2005 and 14-7-2005. He has not filed rejoinder and affidavit in support of his claim statement . The management was present ali along. The management was heard. The case of the workman is thathe was appointed for five months initiall thereafter The work for which the workman was appointed is still going on at various sites of the management . The management has terminated the services of the workman on and from 01-05-2001 without complying with the 13028

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

IPARTY

I PARTY

Shri K.L. Panduranga Rao, The Regional Manager ,

S/o Kotelakshman Rao , VB, HeadOffice , 41/2,

M.G. Road, Trinity Circle,

Vijayalakshmi Takkis Road,

Bangalore-560001

Opp. Suprabatha Tailors

Shimoga,

Karnataka

his appointment was extended . The case of the management is that the workman was under temporary Consultant Site Engineer for construction of Bank , Training Center at Noida for specialized period . When the training centerwas constructed his services was no longer required. His appointment was need based and he was under the Engineer of the site. His appointment was not regular. The workman has failed to prove the case of his claim statement .

AWARD

The reference is replied thus :-

The action of the Bank of India management in terminating the services of Shri Mohd. Irfan Khan w.e.f. 01-05-2001 without notice is just and fair and legal . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

1. The Central Government by exercising the power conferredby clause (d) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 12012/ 229 / 99 /IR ( B - II ) dated 28th December , 1999 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

The Award is given accordingly.

Dated: 20-10-2005 .

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer

"Whether the order of dismissal of Shri K.L. Panduranga Rao , Peon by the management of Vijaya Bank is justified? If not , to what reliefthe said workman is entitled to ?"

नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2005

2.A charge sheet dated 10-6-97 was issued to the first party by the management in the following terms: -- CHARGESHEET

Whereas there are prima facie grounds to believe that you have committed acts of misconduct , the particulars ofwhich are furnished here under:---

का. आ. 4439.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार विजया बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 6/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

You were working as peon at Bank's B.H. Road , Shimoga Branch from 1-10-1983 till the date ofyour suspension on 25-9-1996 .

[सं. एल-12012/229/99- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th October , 2005

It isreported that you have made 7 fraudulent withdrawals amount to Rs. 12,000 from SB account No. 13025 of Shri T. Kumar maintained at B.H. Road Branch, Shimoga by forging the signature of the ac-count holder on the withdrawal slips and the said withdrawal slips were written in your own hand writing . The details of such fraudulent with- drawals are furnished hereunder :-

S.No.

Dateof withdrawal

Amount of withdrawal Rs .

Printed number ofwithdrawal ship S.O. 4439. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 6/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Banglore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Vijaya Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government 27-10-2005. on

892464

8-4-1996

2,500

893495

4-5-96

3,000

500

894177

14-6-96

[No. L- 12012/229/ 1999 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .

20-7-96

894813

2,500

ANNEXURE

894978

6-8-96

2,000

1615483

1,000 14-8-96

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT,

799112

500 22-8-96

BANGALORE

Rs . 12,000

Dated: 7th October 2005

PRESENT:

Shri A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer

It is also reported that you have fraudaiently withdrawn Rs . 9000 from SB account No. 12794 maintained atB.H. Road, Shimoga Branch standing in the name of Shri H.J. Prashant on 29-6-96 by forging the signature of the C.R. No. 6/00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

account holder on withdrawal slip No. 894434 , which was also written in your own hand writing. Out of the said amount of Rs . 9000/-, on the same day you have credited a sum of Rs. 6000/-to SB account No. 13025 of Shri T. Kumar to compensate the fraudulent withdrawals already made in the said account till 29-6-96 and received the remaining cash ofRs. 3000/-from the payment cashier. The credit slip for depositing Rs . 6000/- in SB account of Shri T. Kumar was also written in your own hand writing . It is further revealed that to cover up your above fraudulent transactions from the other staff members/officials /account holder, you have maintained a parallel binder sheet No. 431957 pertaining to SB account No. 13025 with manipulated transactions written in your own hand writing . The said binder sheet covered the transactions from 10-2-1995 to 10-8-1996 and was showing the balance of Rs . 7,709.20 . However, the said transactions do not bear any initial/ authentication by the branch officials . The original binder sheet No. 204224 pertaining to the said SB account was mysteriously kept in the file of removed binder sheets , which covered the transactions from 12-9-1990 to 22-8-1996 with initials/ authentications of the branch officials and was showing balance of Rs . 1709.20 only.

From the above acts on your part, it is evident that you have fraudulently withdrawn the amount of Rs. 12,000/ from SB account No. 13025 and Rs . 9000/-from SB account No. 12794 maintained at B.H. Road Shimoga Branch because ofwhich the bank was incurred a financial loss to the extent of Rs . 15,000/- . In this regard, you have submitted a letter dated 27-9-1996 wherein you have admitted that all the above described fraudulent withdrawals were made by you and nobody also was involved. However, you have submitted one more letter dated 4-10-1996 wherein you have denied the allegation without furnishing convincing rcasons . Such acts on your part are highly prejudicial to the interest of the bank which constitute gross misconduct under the provisions of BPS ,

The bank , therefore , charges you as under:-

" Your action of fraudulent withdrawal of Rs . 12,000/ -from SB account No. 13025 and Rs . 9000/-from SB account No. 12794 are acts prejudicial to the interest of the bank which constitutes gross misconduct under sub - clause (j ) of Clause 19.5 of Chapter XIX of the BPS 1966. " You arc therefore , required to submit your written statement of defence , if any, in triplicate to the undersigned within 7 days of receipt of this charge sheet and show cause as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against you , failing which it will be deemed that you have no written statement to submit and the matter will be procceded with accordingly. "

3. The explanation offered by the first party to the said charge sheet in denying the allegations made therein was not accepted by the management being unsatisfactory resulting into a DE conducted against the first party. Based on the findings of the enquiry officer holding the first party 3276 G1/05-22

13029

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

guilty of the charges misconduct leveled against him, the management (Disciplinary Authority) dismissed the first party from the services of the bank by impugned punishment order dated 30-6-98 . The first party preferred an appeal unsuccessfully and thereupon he raised the Industrial dispute by approaching the Conciliation Officer andbased on the failure report submitted by him the present reference came to be referred to this tuibunal for adjudication.

4. The first party by his Claim Statement while narrating the facts resulting into order of dismissal passed against him , however, challenged the enquiry proceedings itself on the ground that they were not conducted in accordance with law and suffered from violation of principles of natural justice . The first party also challenged the enquiry findings as perverse and dismissal order as illegal not to be sustained at the hands of this tribunal .

5.The management by its Counter Statement however , contended that the enquiry conducted against the first party was quite proper and fair adhering to the principles ofnaturaljustice . Wherein, first party was given sufficient and reasonable opportunity to defend himself taking the assistance of co - worker and he participated in the enquiry proceedings without any protest. The management further contended that sufficient and legal evidence in the form of oral testimony and documents was pressed into service by the management during the course of enquiry and it is based on the said evidence , enquiry findings have been submitted holding the first party guilty of the misconduct . The management further contended that keeping in view the gravity of the Misconduct , the order dismissing the first party from its services was quite legal and justified and therefore, need not be interfered at the hands of this tribunal.

6.Kepping in view the respective contentions of the parties with regard to the fairness and validity or otherwise of the enquiry proceedings , this tribunal framed the following Preliminary Issue:--

"Whether the DE conducted by the Second Party against the first party is fair and proper "

and took up the said issue for hearing for the first instance . During the course of trial of the said issue , the management examined the Enquiry Officer as MWI and got marked certain documents including charge sheet , proceedings of enquiry and enquiry findings at Ex.M1 to M8 . No evidence was led on behalf of the first party.

7. After having heard the learned counsel for the management ( learned counsel for the first party remained absent on the date of hearing ) this tribunal by its order dated 3-1-04 answered the above said Preliminary issue in favour of the management holding that the DE conducted by it against the first party is fair and proper. Then the matter came to be posted to hear the learned counsels for the parties on merits of the case . From 25-1-05 till 27-9-05 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

13030

committed by the enquiry officer in appreciating the evidence brought on record to hold the workman guilty of the charges . I would like to bring on record the relevant portionofthe reasonings of the enquiry officer on pages 8 to 10 of the findings so as to make the point clear that his findings do not suffer from perversity. Those reasonings from pages 8 to 10 are as under :-

FINDINGS

the matter underwent several adjournments giving opportunities to learned counsel for the parties to advance arguments on merits . Learned counsel for the first party remained absent throughout . On 5-9-05 when the matter was taken up finally, once again learned counsel for the firstparty remained absent and after hearing the learned counsel for the management another opportunity was given to the first party counsel for his arguments taking up the case on 27-9-05 on which date again he did not turn up and therefore, the matter is posted this day for award .

"As discussed above , the evidences against CSE about his complicity in the alleged fraud are evaluated not solely on the basis of his two admission letters [ Ex. M21 ( a) and 21 (b) ] but on the basis of totality of the evidences on record corroborative to his involvement in the fraud. In his written statement dated 4-10-1996 (Ex. M22 ) , CSE had admitted that the two letters Ex . M21 (a) and Ex. 21 (b) were written by him only and the contents and the signatures therein are also his . He further admitted that the binder sheet No. 431597 had been written by him only.

8. Learned counsel for the management vehemently argued that in the light of the finding recorded by this tuibunal holding that DE conducted against the first party bythe Second Party is fair and proper, it was incumbent on the part of the first party to establish before this tuibunal asto how enquiry findings suffered from perversity so as to set aside the dismissal order based on those findings . He argued that there was sufficient and legal evidence produced during the course of enquiry by examiningas many as 9 witnesses and getting marked in all 47 documents to substantiate the charges of misconduct leveled against the first party. Therefore , learned counsel submitted that there was no legal or factual defect in the findings of the enquiry officer in coming to the conclusion that the charges of misconduct leveled against the first party have been proved. He nextly submitted that punishment of dismissal was again quite proportionate and incommensurate keeping in view the gravity of the misconduct committed by the first party and therefore , dismissal order is to be sustained rejecting the reference on hand .

However, the CSE had denied that the withdrawal slips No. 079912 for Rs. 500 /- , No. 89345 for Rs . 3000/-, No. 894978 for Rs . 2000/- , No.1615483 , No. 892464 , No.8948 13 and No. 894434 as also the credit slip for Rs. 6,000/-dated 29-6-1996 to SB account No. 13025 were written by him. He further statedthat the earlier two letters [Ex . M21 (a) and 21 (b) ] submitted by him to the Sr. Branch Manager (MW3 ) were not given by him voluntarily and the same were obtained under pressure/coercion . He explained further that the binder sheet No. 431957 had been written by him since the original sheet was torn and nobody had advised him to write the same . He could not take signature of the officer on the binder sheet written by him since he was called to do some other work with regard to the above contentions oftheCSE in his letter dated 4-10-1996 (Ex . M 22 ) , I would like to state as follows: ----

The version of CSE that the original of the binder sheet of SB account No. 13025 was torn of is far from truth in as much as the same was located by the branch on 13-9-96 along with the removed loose sheets of SB accounts as deposed by MW3 at page 9 of EP. Assuming hypothetically that the original binder sheet of SB account No. 13025 was torn off, it was not the duty of CSE as sub staff at the branch to write the duplicate binder sheet . Hence , his contention is not tenable . Further if the contention of the CSE that he had merely copied the torn binder sheet is true, then the entries in the duplicate binder sheet written by him should have been the same as that of the original one but in the instant case as deposed by MW3 , the balance in SB account No. 13025 as on 16-9-1996 as per the balancing register should have been Rs. 2,209.20 only whereas as per Ex.M7 which was admittedlywritten by the CSE the balance shown therein is Rs. 7,709.20 . Further, MW2 and MW3 who are supposed to be acquainted with the handwriting of the CSE had affirmed that the incriminating document of the alleged fraudulent withdrawali.e . Ex . M2 bearing No 894434 dated 9. After having gone through the records , I find substance in his arguments .A perusal of the enquiry report would make it abundantly clear that after having afforded sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the first party to defend himself, the enquiry officer conducted the enquiry in all fairness in accordance with principles of natural justice. He recorded the statements of 9 witnesses for the management and marked as many as 47 documents produced by the management in support of the oral testimony and in proof of the charges leveled against the first party. On going through the findings of the enquiry officer it can be seen that the enquiry officer after having raised proper questions and issues based on the charges leveled against the first party proceeded to discuss oral as well as documentary evidence brought on record . He recorded his findings on pages 4 to 10. In order to find out as to whether the learned enquiry officer apreciated the oral and documentary evidence brought on record in its proper perspective to hold the first party guilty of the charges. I have scanned through the entire evidences of the aforesaid 9 management witnesses and also went through the documentary evidence produced by the management and so also considered the reasonings assigned by the enquiry officer in coming to the aforesaid conclusions. Ido not find any legal or factual defect [ भाग II--खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

29-6-1996 for Rs . 9000/-on SB account No. 12794 of Shri H. J. Prashanth , Ex . M3 i.e. paying in slip of SB No. 13025 of Shri T. Kumar dated 29-6-1996 for Rs . 6,000 and Ex . MI (a ) to (b ) bear the handwriting of the CSE . Besides , the management witnesses had emphatically affirmed that the CSE had admitted with the Sr. Branch Manager ( MW3 ) in their presence that the CSE only had committed the alleged raud in the two SB accounts in question . No evidence was adduced by the defence to substantiate the contention of the CSE that he had pressurized/ coerced to give the admission Ictters in question . In view of the above discussions , the action of CSE in retracting his earlier two letters vide his letter dated 4-10-96 i.e. Ex . M22 is only an after thought and the same had no force . If the CSE is really innocent he need not have prepared fabricated binder sheet of SB account No. 13025 by falsely showing the balance therein as Rs . 7,809.20 instead of the actual balance of Rs . 2,209.20 only and omitting the withdrawals amounting to Rs . 6,000 . The fact that he had credited a sum of Rs. 6000 10 SB account No. 13025 on 29-6-96 is yet another corroborative evidence for his fraudulenı act ..

Further more , MWI i.c. Shri T. Kumar who is the holder of SB account No. 13025 , in which account the alleged fraudulent withdrawals took place, had in his deposition at page 3 to 5 of EP identified/ confirmed his statements i.c. Ex. M9 , Ex.M10 (a ) and (b ) and affirmed that whatever mentioned therein were told by hint to the bank's official who recorded his statement in the presence of the Sr. Branch Manager, B.H Road Shimoga branch. He further stated that the signatures appearing on Ex. M1 ( a) to Ex.MI (g) are not his . From the above , it is evident that the signatures appearing on all the withdrawal stips i.e. Ex. MI (a) to Ex. M1 ( g ) are forged once . As per the admission letters of the CSE i.e. Ex. M21 (a) and 21 (b) , he being the interested party in the matter and judged by cirumstantiaf evidences , I have every reason to believe that forgery of the signatures of the account holder in respect of SB account No. 13025 and 12794 is the handiwork ofthe CSE only. MW1 has further confirmed to have been reimbursed with Rs . 6000 from the branch being the balance amount due to him out of the fraudulent withdrawals amount to Rs . 12,000 done by the CSE from his SB account No. 13025. The DR during his cross examination of M1 could not be able to bring any contradiction in the evidence of the witness.

Another witness MW4 i.e. Shri H.J. Prashanth Hegde , who is the holder of SB account No. 12794 in which account the alleged fraudulent withdrawal of Rs . 9,000 took place on 29-6-1996 has in his deposition at page 10 of the EP had confirmed to have given the statement dated 1-10-1996 i.c. Ex. M11 . He emphatically stated that he drawer's singnature and the remitter's signature purportedly ofhim appearing in Ex . M2 and Ex. M3 are not his . He had further stated that he had been reimbursed with a sum of Rs. 9000 by the branch being the amount due

13031

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

to him from the bank in respecct of fraudulent withdrawal ofRs. 9000 form his SB account No. 12794 on 29-6-96 .

From the above lacts , the contentions of CSE vide Ex . M22 that the incriminating documents in question are not written by him are not tenable. The next question is of financial lossto the bank. As mentioned above , both the account holders of SB account No. 12794 and 13025 have confirmed at the enquiry that they were reimbursed a total sum of Rs . 15,000 by the branch and the said fact is corroborated from Ex. M27 ( a ) to 27 (d ) .

Fromthe foregoing discussions. I hold that both the issues are proved against CSE . "

10. Therefore , from the reading of the above said reasonings it can be safely concluded that the findings of the enquiry officer are very much based on suíficient and legal evidence in the form of oral and documentary evidence produced by the management during the course of enquiry. As noted above , in the light of the findings recorded by this tribunal to the effect that enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second Party is fair and proper, the burden heavily cast upon the shoulders of the first party to highlight the defects in the findings of the Enquiry Officer to substantiate his contention that they suffered from perversity. There was no attempt made on the part of the first party and as seen above , learned counsel for the first party did not argue on the said point . Morcover , the findings on hand are very much supported by sufficient and Iegaf oral as well as documentary evidence . It is neither a case of' no evidence ' nor a case of ' no legal evidence ' so as to lead to the conclusion that findings suffered from any perversity. In the result , it must be held that findings of the enquiry officer in holding the first party guilty of the charges of misconduct against him are quite perfect and legal . As argued for the management it also cannot be said that the punishment of dismissal passed against the first party was disproportionate or excessive keeping in view the nature of misconduct committed by the first party. In the result dismissal passed against the first party appears to be justified and legal . Hence the following award is passed.

AWARD

The reference is dismissed. No order to cost .

(Dictated to P A transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 7th October, 2005)

A.R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4440- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल- 12012/104/2000-आई. आर. ( बी -11 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव 13032

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANΝΑ 5 , 1927

New Delhi , the 27th October, 2005

S.O. 4440 In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 69/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27-10-2005 .

[No. L- 12012/104/2000 - IR (B- II )] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT BANGALORE

Dated: 20th October , 2005

PRESENT:

Shri A.R SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer

C. R. No. 69/00

IIPARTY IPARTY

The Asstt . Secretary, TheManaging Director, CanaraBank

No. 112, J. C. Road,

Employees Union,

Bangalore,

CanaraBank, Head Office, KARNATAKA

C/o Canara Bank, Cantonment, BellaryP.O, Bellary,

KARNATAKA

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order. No. L- 12012 / 104/2000 IR (B - II ) dt. 21/9/2000 dated for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of respondent management of M/s. Canara Bank, Bangalore isjustified in imposing the punishment of reduction to a lower stage in time scale ofpay by two stages to the workman Shri K.Z. Sherikar ? If not , what relief the applicant workman is entitled to?"

2. The first party Union , espousing the cause of the firstpartyworkman , in its Claim Statement challenged the order passed by the management imposing the punishment of reduction to a lower stage in time scale of pay by two stages on workman as illegal and unjust and it also challenged the enquiry proceedings conducted against the first party (workman) on the ground that it was against the principles of natural justice in not giving fair and reasonable opportunity to the workman to defend himself.

The first party union also challenged the enquiry findings holding the workman guilty of the charges as perverse andarbitrary.

3.Whereas, the management maintained and asserted that the proceedings of the enquiry conducted against the first party were in tune with the principles of natural justice and that the workman had been given fair and reasonable opportunity to defended himself and he in fact participated in the proceedings and defend himself taking the help of defence repesentative . The management also contended that the findings of the enquiry holding the workman guilty ofthe charges was based on oral and documentary evidence pressed into service during the course of enquiry and therefore, findings of enquiry being supported by cogent and valid reasonings based on sufficient and legal evidence, it cannot be said that they suffered from perversity. Management also contended that keeping in view the findings of the enquiry holding the workman guilty ofthe charges, the impugned punishment awarded against the workman was quite proportionate keeping in view the nature of the misconduct committed by the workman.

4. In the light of the aforesaid respective contentions of the parties with regardto fairness and validity or otherwise of the enquiry proceedings , this court on 15-4-2004 framed the following Preliminary Issue: - 'Whether the DE conducted against the first party is fair and proper ' and it was taken up for trial in the first instance.

5. During the course of trial of the said issue , the management examined the Enquiry Officer as MW1 . and gotmarked in all 11 documents at Ex . MI to M11 including the proceedings of enduiry and findings of the enquiry. There was no evidence adduced on behalf of the first party. After hearing the learned, counsel for the management (counsel for the first party was remained absent on date of hearing) this court by its order dated 7-7-05 answered the above said Preliminary Issue in favour ofthe management holding that enquiry held against the first party was fair and proper. Then the matter came to be postedto hear the learned counsels for the parties on merits of the case . From 7-7-2005 till 18-10-2005 , the case underwent several adjournments to hear the matter on merits and to report the settlement if any, as submitted by the learned counsel for the first party. On 18-10-2005 、 learned counsel for the first party filed a memo not pressing the dispute on hand stating that the grievances of the first party have been taken up at liaison level by the first party union with the management and therefore, first party union may be promoted to withdraw the dispute on hand.

6. Learned counsel for the management had no objection in passing the orders based on the above said memo . Therefore , in the light of the aforesaid memo , following award is passed:

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

13033

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

AWARD

Reference on hand is dismissed as withdrawn. No order to cost . (Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 20th October 2005)

A.R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4441.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 72/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल- 12012/110/2000-आई . आर. ( बी-11 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th October, 2005

S.O. 4441 .--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 72/ 2000 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Cum- Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 27-10-2005 .

[No.L - 12012/ 110/ 2000- IR (B- II)]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated: 19th October 2005

PRESENT

Shri A.R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer C. R. No. 72/2000

I PARTY

II PARTY Shri Rathan Narayan The Deputy General Manager Waigankar,

SyndicateBank ,

House No. 29. Baithkol , ZonalOffice,

Syndicate Towers , UDUPI -576101 Karanataka

P.O. Goudawada KARWAR- 581302 Karanataka

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 12012 / 110/ 2000 / IR(B - II ) dated 18th October, 2000 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDILE

"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank, Manipal , in not providing employment to Shri Rathan Narayan Waigankar , Ex. TemporaryAttender who worked in different spells during the period from 1986 to 1993 at Karwar and Yellapur branches of the Syndicate Bank is justified? Ifnot, what relief the said workman is entitled ? " 2. The case of the first party workman , as made out in the Claim Statement , in brief is that he started his career as a Temporary Attender on 15-1-1986 working under the management branches at Karwar and Mallapur. He worked from 15-1-1986 till 8-5-1993 and his total working days in the above said period come to 185 days . The details of which are shown as per the annexure Ex . Pl . In the meanwhile the first party made an application on 22-4-1993 giving out the details of his qualification and the working days seeking employment from the Second party as a Temporary Peon . He was called upon to produce certain documents as per the letter dated 20-1-2000 issued by the Second party ; that when his application was not considered, the first party raised the Industrial Dispute resulting into the present reference. The first party therefore, contended that he having worked already for 172 days as onthe date of eligibility as against the required days of 90 wasa right person to be given a fair chance by appointing him as a temporary Peon . Therefore , the management committed illegality in refusing him work from 9-5-93 onwards and therefore, he is entitled to the employment along with all other consequential benefits .

3. The management by its Counter Statement while not disputing the fact that the first party worked under it between 1986 to 1993 and his last date of working was 8-5-1993 , however, contended that the first party in the aforesaid period of 4 years worked for a total period of 156 days and thereafter he was again engaged for 6 days in April 1994 and one day in May 1994 and in this way his total number of working days come to 163 days . It is the case ofthe management that as per the guidelines governing the bank institutions issued in the year 1990 , an opportunity was to be given to the Temporary Attenders who worked between 1-1-1982 to 31-12-1989 for 90 days to submit their applications for empanelment as Temporary Peons to work in the leave vacancies . Accordingly during the year 1991 themanagement got issued an advertisement to this effect inDaily Newspapers i.e. Indian Express , Udayawani and Samyukta Karnataka dated 4-2-1991 , 22-1-1991 and 27-1-1991 respectively calling for the applications with one ofthe conditions that the person seeking post of Attender/ Peon should have passed 7th Standard of Karnataka or equivalent and should be less than 18 years and not more than26 years as on the date of first temporary appointment. However, the first party never responded to the said advertisement and as per the records maintained by the bank it was found that he was aged more than 26 years as [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) | 13034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

on the date of the first engagement . Therefore , mere satisfying one condition of working more than 90 days doesnot ipso facto entitle the first party to be considered for the inclusion in the panel . In the result, the first party has already lost his right of entitlement to be considered by the management; That as per the transfer certificate dated 14-10-99 of the first party, his date of birth is mentioned as 3-11-1959 and therefore , he had already crossed 26 years of age as on the date of his first appointment and thereby was not eligible to be considered astemporrary Peon to be brought on the panel maintained by the Bank; that the present dispute raised by the first party is also not maintainable as his services were discontinued by the bank in the month of May 1994 itself and whereas , he raised the present dispute after a lapse of 6 years period just to have some unlawful gain. In the result the reference is liable to be dismissed.

4. During the course of trial, the management examined one witness as MW1 and got marked as many as 7 documents at Ex. Ml to M7 . His statement in examirtation chief is as under : ---

Samyukta Karnataka during the February and January 1991. Copics of these papers with relevant publication are at Ex.M3 to Ex. MS . The requirement for appointment have been mentioned in these publications . The first party in response to the advertisement did not submit any application sceking the appointment . As on 15-1-1986 i.e. at the time of his first appointment he was aged more than 26 years . His date ofbirth as mentioned in Form No.3 ( Caste Certificate) and in Transfer Certificate is shown as 3-11-1959 . These certificates are marked as Ex.M6 and Ex.M7. He was not eligible for appointment as per the requirement of age he being over aged as on 15-1-1986. Therefore , his name was not empanelled in the list of Temporary Employees . As and when services of temporary employee required the worker found in the list of Temporary Employees will be engaged on temporary basis. The second party did not engage the services of the first party subsequent tothe month of May , 1994 as he was not eligible to brought in the Panel . He raised the dispute before the ALC ( C) , Mangalore in the year 1999. 1 have attended the conciliation proceedings. First party is not entitled to the claim made by him " .

5. As on 17-6-04 , when MW1 was examined beforc this tribunal , the first party who was present before this tribunal requested for adjournment on the ground of engaging a lawyer on the next date of hearing. On 19-8-04 when the case was taken up the first party again sought adjournment for cross examination of MW1 . On 10-2-2005, first party remained absent . On 28-4-05 , first party again remain absent though witness MW1 was present . Once again as a final chance cross examination of MWI was deferred to 10-8-2005 on which date again first party remained absent and there being no representation on behalf of the first party, MWI was discharged posting the case of the first party on the next date of hearing . On 28-9-05 the first party again remained absent and the notice which was issued to him as a precautionary measure was also returned unserved as ' refused' . Therefore, the matter was taken as heard and case is posted this day for award.

6. Learned counsel for the management taking the court through the statement of MWI and the documents at Ex.MI to M7 argued that though the first party worked for a period of 90 days between the years 1982 and 1989 and was eligible to be brought on a panel maintained by bank for selection of temporary Peons . He however, did not avail the opportunity of interview held in the year 1991 . He further submitted that one of the conditions for the selection of the temporary peon as per the guidelines of the bank institution was that the candidates should not cross26 years of age as on the date of his first appointment . In the instant case the first party liave already crossed age of 26 years as his date of birth was 3-11-1959 as per the very transfer certificates produced by him and marked "Presently I am working as Branch Manager. Dharwad Road , Belgaum. During the year 1997 to 2003. I was working in the personal department at Zonal office atUdupi . On the basis of records , I know the facts of the case. I had an access and control over the personalmatters of the department in the capacity of Manager ( Personnel ) . First party was appointed as per the order dated 15-1-1986 as a Temporary Attender for a period from 15-01-1986 to 20-01-1986 . It was during the leave period of regular employee . The appointment order is at Ex. M1 . His services in the manner stated above were engaged in the year , 1986, 1987 and in the year 1993. In the year 1994 he was engaged for 6 days in the month of April and one day in the month of May. I have given the statement in detail for the number of days the first party was engaged in our various branches in the said 2 branches which is at Ex . M2. The first party hasworked for 169 days in all in the aforesaid year of 1986, 1987, 1993 and 1994. In the year 1990 guidelines were issued by the Govemment of India in regard to the appointment of temporary employees fixing the minimum qualification for Group ' D ' employees as 7th Std. pass and age as 18 years and above and below 26 years as on the date of first appointment as temporary. For a temporary worker who completed 90 days and more service for the period from 1-8-1982 to 31-12-1989 his name was to brought on panel to be considered for a appointment as a Temporary employee . Such temporary employees will be considered for a permanant post as and when the vacancy arose in the Bank . In compliance to that guidelines we had taken an Advertisement in Daily Newspaper Indian Express , Udaya Vani and 13035

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(Dictated to PA, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 19-10-2005)

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer before this tribunal at Ex . M6 and M7. The learned counsel lastly submitted that the present dispute is also not maintainable on account of inordinate delay ofa period of 6years from the date of alleged denial ofthe work to the first party by the Bank. As noted above , on the date the case was posted for arguments , learned counsel again remained absent and therefore , there was no arguments on his behalf.

नई दिल्ली , 27 अक्तूबर, 2005 का.आ. 4442- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/71/2001- आई. आर. ( बी-11 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th October, 2005 S.O. 4442. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 48/ 2001 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum- Labour Court, Bangalore , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the managemen of Syndicate Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 27-10-2005 .

[No. L- 12012/71/2001 - IR (B -II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT BANGALORE Dated: 5th October, 2005 PRESENT Shri A.R SIDDIQUI PRESIDING OFFICER C. R. No. 48/01

II PARTY

I PARTY

The Managing Director, Syndicate Bank , Head Office , Manipal Karnataka -576119

Smt . G. Lalitha Seetharam , 823, Sri Lakshmi Nilayam , 5th A Main , 9th Cross, West Chord Road, 2nd Stage, Bangalore- 560086

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section 2A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 12012/ 71/2001 - IR (B - II ) dated 16th July, 2001 for adjudication on the following schedule: SCHEDULE 7. After having gone through the records, I find substance in the arguments . The statement of MW1 in his examination chief before this tribunal is to substantiate the various contentions taken by the management in its Countner Statement. Moreover, it is also supported by the documentary evidence at Ex. M1 to M7 . The abovesaid statement unfortunately has remained unchallenged and uncontroverted as the first party despite a resonable opportunity given to him remained absent before this tribunal and failed to cross - examine the said witness . It is also to be noted that the first party also did not adduce any evidence on his part once again for the same reason of his absence before this tribunal when the case was taken up for evidence. As noted above , he remained absent before this tribunal despite a notice issued to him which was returned unserved with an endorsement ' refused return to sender ' . Therefore , from the conduct of the first party it can be seen that he is no more interested in prosecuting the proceedings on hand . Moreover, as could be seen from the records , the stand taken by the management in denying work to the first party has been established by sufficient oral and documentary evidence . It has been made clear in the statement of MW1 that keeping in view the guidelines issued in the year 1990 opportunity was given to the first party and others working as temporary attenders /Peons in between 1-1-1982 and 31-12-89 for a period of 90 days calling upon themto appear in the interview and accordingly newspaper publication was made as per the documents at Ex. M3 to M5 . It is also made clear in the statement of MW1 that in response to the said advertisement in newspapers , the first party did not appear or filed his application seeking the appointment. He has further made it clear that the first party also had crossed age of 26 years as per his certificate and therefore , he was not eligible for selection as temporary Peon to be brought on the panel of the bank even otherwise. As seen above , the statement of MW1 has gone undenied and there is no evidence on the part of the first party again to rebut the statement of MW1 . In the result this court has no hesitation to come to the conclusion that the first party is not entitled for the relief sought . As argued for the management the present dispute is also not tenable for the inordinate delay caused in raising the dispute after a gap of more than 6 years that too without any explanation offered by the first party for the delay in raising the dispute . Accordingly the reference is answered and following award ispassed.

AWARD

"Whether M/ s . Syndicate Bank, Bangalore is justified in ordering dismissal of Smt . G. Lalitha The reference is dismissed . No order to cost .

[ PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 13036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

Seetharam, former Clerk of Rajajinagar II Stage Branch , Bangalore from service ? If not , what relief the disputant is entitled for ? "

further took up the contention that keeping in view the gravity of the misconduct committed by the first party, the punishment of dismissal was quite proportionate not to be interfered at the hands of this tribunal . At Para 2 ( a ) to ( f) the management reproduced the allegations in the charge sheet issued to the first party as under :-

Para 2 ( a ) :- There was a debit balance of Rs . 17,316.65 as on 10-10-1995 in the first party's Overdraft on deposit account (OOD account No. 777) . There was a credit of Rs . 1000/- on 11-10-1995 to the above account . After this credit, the debit balance in the ODD account should have been reduced to Rs. 16,316.65 . But the first party altered the credit of Rs. 1000/-to Rs . 6,000/- and reduced the debit balance to Rs . 11,316.65 . These alterations are not authenticated by any supervisory staff. She also altered the carried over new continuation sheet bearing No. 035773 on 11-10-1995 and withdrew anamount of Rs . 5,000 /-on 24-10-1995 by means ofcheque dated 24-10-1995.

(b) In order to suppress her abovesaid acts , she took the ledger sheet No. 035773 in respect of ODD 777 to her house , replacing the sheet by a new sheet No. 029635 prepared by incorporating the relevant entries and by forging the initials appearing thercon to make believe that the sheet thus replaced by her is genuine one .

(c) In the replaced ledger sheet No. 029635 , she madc a fictitious cash credit entry of Rs . 10,000/- with date showing as 24-10-1995 , without actually remitting the case on that day and reduced the debitbalance from Rs . 12 , 166.65 to Rs . 2,166.65 .

(d) In order to suppress the alterations made in transfer credit dated 11-10-1995 and fictitious credit entry dated 24-10-1995 as mentioned above , she made alterations in the following Over Drafts on Deposit Accounts (ODD A/cs ): -

(i) The balance amount in ODD 689 standing in the name of M/ s Crown Sweet Paradise should have been Rs . 1,013.26. She altered the balance to Rs . 6,013.26 to set off the alteration of Rs . 5,000/ - made by her in her ODD account No. 777 .

2.Thecase ofthe first party, as made out in her Claim Statement , briefly stated, is that she having joined the services of the management as a Clerk was working at the Rajajinagar Branch at the relevant point of time. She was discharging her duties sincerely and had a clean and excellent record of service without a single black spot in her service career of about 22 years ; that as per order dated 7-11-1995 passed by the Assistant General Manager, she was placed under suspension on certain allegations and she denied those allegations by giving her reply. However , the management issued a charge sheet dated 9-3-96 based on the same allegations and she gave reply to the charge sheet on 10-5-96 denying the allegations. The management not being satisfied with the explanation submitted by her , initiated the disciplinary proceedings by conducting a farce of enquiry denying her all the reasonable and adequate opportunities to put forth her defence and the entire enquiry was held in utter violation of principles of natural justice. On the conclusion of the enquiry, findings were submitted on 12-9-96 holding the first party guilty of the charges and on the basis of the aforesaid findings , she was dismissed from service by impugned punishment order dated 30-7-97; that the management witness , MW2 during the course of enquiry made totally misleading statement in order to cover up certain lapses of other officers/ supervisory staff of the branch, committed by them in the banking transactions and business . His statement was also not corroborated by the statement of another management witness , MW1 . Therefore , the findings ofthe enquiry were not based on sufficient and legal evidence ; that the allegation made against the first party of indulging in manipulation of books of accounts , forgery , fraud etc. were false and baseless ; that under threat and coercion , 5 letters have been obtained from the first party by the officers of the branch who were ill disposed against her ; that there was no financial loss caused to the bank nor the first party gained any monetary benefits at the cost of the bank and therewas no complaint against her from any customer with regard to the allegations made against her. Therefore , enquiry conducted against her was against the principles ofnatural justice , findings of the enquiry were not based onevidence and that dismissal order passed against her was illegal and disproportionate , keeping in view the gravity of the alleged misconduct committed by her. Therefore , she requested this tribunal to pass an award reinstating her in service with all back wages , continuity of service and other consequential benefits .

(ii) The balance amount in ODD 778 of Shri B. Ratnakar and Shri S. Anil Kumar was Rs . 14,981/- . She made alteration in the said account from Rs . 1,4981/-to Rs. 24,981 . Further, interest of Rs . 450/- was debited to this altered balance and correct balance was mentioned as Rs . 25,431/- .

(e) On 17-10-95, Smt . H. C. Prabha handed over a sum ofRs . 5,000 /- to the first party for crediting the same to Current Account No. 1096 as she was excecting presentation of cheque for 3..The management by its Counter Statement resisted the claim of the first party contending that enquiry conducted against her was in accordance with the principles tural justice and that findings of the enquiry were based on sufficient oral and documentary evidence. It 13037 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

Rs. 20,000 in her over draft on deposit (ODD) 777. At para 4, itcontended that the above acts of the first party being prejudicial to the interest of the management bank , she was rightly placed under suspension pending enquiry by an order dated 7-11-95 followed by charge sheet dated 9-3-96 seeking her explanation within 15 days of the receipt of the charge sheet . She did not give reply to the charge sheetbutjust demanded her 5 letters given to the different officers of the bank confessing with the guilt . There upon the management ordered DE against the first party by examining two management witnesses and getting marked inall 62 documents resulting into the findings of the Enquiry Officer holding the first party guilty of the charges based on which impugned punishment order was passed against her dismissing her from service . Therefore , the management requested this Tribunal to reject the reference and claim of the first party made above.

Rs . 5,000 issued by her. But the first party did not credit the said amount to the Current Account of the said customer and instead made a fictitious credit entry for Rs . 5,000/- with date 21-10-95 and debited the cheque No. 393643 dated 17-10-1995 for Rs . 5,000 issuedby the firm on that day. The said cheque No. 393643 for Rs. 5,000/ - was presented in clearing and was returned for want offunds and Rs . 10 was debited to the Current Account No. 1096 of the said customer on 19-10-1995 . When the said cheque was presented for the second time on 21-10-1995 , the first party made fictitious credited entry for Rs. 5,000 and debited the cheque as mentioned above . However, in the pass book of the said account , it is shown that Rs . 5000 was credited on 18-10-1995 and the cheque was debited to the account on the same day . The debit of Rs . 10 for return of the cheque on 18-10-1995 was not at all mentioned in the passbook.

5. Keeping in view the respective contentions of the parties with regard to the fairness and validity or other- wise of the enquiry proceedings conducted against the first party by the Second party, this Tribunal on 21-4-04 framed the following Preliminary Issue

"Whether the DE conducted against the first party is fair and proper " and the above said issue was taken up forhearing in the first instance . During the course of trial ofthe said issue the management examined enquiry officer asMW1 and got marked 4 documents at Ex. Ml to M4 including the findings of the enquiry. There was no evidence led on the part of the first party. On 28-7-05 when the matter was posted for arguments , learned counsel for the First Party remained absent and after hearing the learned counsel for the Second Party this Tribunal by its order dated 8-8-05 recorded the finding to the effect that the DE conducted against the First Party by the Second Party is fairand proper. Then the matter came to be posted to hear the counsels on merits of the case. On 27-9-05 once again the learned counsel for the party did not turn up and after having heard the learned counsel for the management case isposted this day for award.

(f) In order to set off/suppress the above fictitious credit of Rs. 5000 and to tally the balancing which wasduc on 27-10-95 , she altered the amount of other two current accounts viz . Current Account No. 885 belonging to a customer Shri T. K. Swamy for Rs . 1000 and Rs . 4000 in current account No. 904 belonging to Shri Durga Engineers Works . The current Account No. 885, opened in the name of Shri T. K. Swamy was classified under dormant account with a balance ofRs . 3318.39 with the remarks mentioned as 'Party Deceased' . On 21-5-1994, the account was carried over to a new continuation sheet No. 062313 with credit balance of Rs . 3318.39 . Further the account was again carried over to another sheet No. 049940 with ' brought forward' date on 21-5-1994. However, the balance in sheet No. 049940 was altered by the first party from Rs . 3318.39 to Rs . 2318.39 . This alteration was not authenticated by any supervisory staff. The firstparty made alteration in the current account No. 904 showing the balance amount from Rs . 39851.50 to Rs . 35,851.50, standing in the name ofM/s . Sri Durga Engineering Works which was opened on 10-12-1991 and was mentioned in the ledger sheet that the account has been frozen on 17-5-1994,

6. Learned counsel for the management argued that the DE conducted against the First Party having been held to be fair and proper , now the only question to be gone into by this Tribunal was " whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer suffered from any perversity and as to whether the punishment of dismissal was in any way not proportionate and commensurate to the gravity of the misconduct committed by the First Party. " He argued that during the course of enquiry, the management examined 2 important and competent witnesses namely, the Investigation Officer was MWI and the then Branch Manager as MW2 taking support of as many as 62 documents marked at Ex. MEX 1 to MEX 62 substantiating the aforesaid charges of misconduct levelled against the First Party and therefore , it cannot be said that the findings 4. At Para 3 , it contended that when the aforesaid misconduct of the first party came to light , first party was questioned about it and she on her own voluntarily submitted a letter dated 4-11-95 and a letter dated 5-11-95 confessing the guilt and undertaking to reimburse the amount to the bank. She further confirmed her misconduct once again by letter dated 6-11-95 by depositing a sum of

3276 CI /05-23 13038

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

7. As noted above , she remained unrepresented when the matter was taken up for arguments on merits . Therefore , in the light of the above discussion , I must hold that charges ofmisconduct have been proved against the First Party in the light of the findings submitted by the Enquiry Officer . Comingto the quantum of the punishment it was well argued for the management that keeping in view the gravity of the misconduct committed by the first party, the management was left with no option but to remove the First Party from the services of the bank once for all by passing the impugned punishment order dismissing her from its services. In the result reference is answered accordingly the following award is passed .

AWARD

The reference is dismissed . No order to cost . (Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signedby me on 5th October, 2005)

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2005

का.आ. 4443.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार न्यू इण्डिया एश्योरेंस कं.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली संख्या- II के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 62/ 2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-17012/ 27/ 2001- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] बी. एम. डैविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 28th October, 2005

S.O. 4443. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 62 / 2001, of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - Cum- Labour Court , New Delhi No. II as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the management of The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 28-10-2005 .

[No. L - 17012/27/2001 - IR (B - II) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Sccy.

ANNEXURE

I.D. No. 62/2001

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI Presiding Officer : R.N. Rai

In the matter of:-- Shri Rakesh Kumar, S/ o Shri Chajju Ram, R./o . 16/724 -E , Bapa Nagar , Padam Singh Road, Karol Bagh , New Delhi - 110005

ofthe enquiry suffered from any perversity. On the point ofpunishment of dismissal , the learned counsel submitted that keeping in view the gravity of the misconduct committed by the first party, the management was left with no alternative butto get rid off the services of the first party by passing the order dismissing her services . As noted above, there was no representation for the First Party and in the result no arguments were advanced on her behalf highlighting any legal or factual defects in the findings of the enquiry officer holding the First Party guilty of the charges of misconduct so as to say that those finding suffered from any perversity. Despite the fact that there was no case made out by the First Party either by leading evidence or by advancing the arguments as te how the findings of the enquiry suffered from perversity, this tribunal thought it proper to go through the findings of the enquiry officer so as to ascertain as to whether they were based on sufficient and legal evidence to substantiate the charges of misconduct levelled against the First Party. À perusal of the enquiry findings which is very much in detail bringing on record the oral testimony of MWI as well as MW2 and the documents marked on behalt of the managcinent at Ex . MEX. 1 to MEX.62 , the learned Enquiry Officer discussed the oral testimony of the said two witnesses as well as the documentary evidence in all its detail and finally came to the conclusion that the charges levelled against the first party have been proved beyond any doubt . I have gone through the detailed testimony of the Investigation Officer. MWI and the tien Branch Manager , MW2 and the various documents produced by the management in support of the above said orai testimony. Learned Enquiry Officer not only discussed the statenient ofMWI and 2 in their examination chiefbui aiso had taken into consideration their statements brought out in their cross examination on behalf of the First Party taking the assistance of defence representative . Learned enquiry Officer discussed and analysed oral and documentary evidence pressed into service on behalf of the management under the heading Analysis of evidence from pages 13 to 18 and after having appreciated the evidence in its proper perspective and rejecting the defence taken by the First Party, in my opinion rightly came to the conclusion that the charges of misconduct levelled against the first party have been proved beyond any doubt . As argued for the management there was sufficient and legal evidence to substantiate those charges of misconduct. The evidence brought on record was appreciated by the Enquiry Officer atlength and thread bare . Therefore , it was neither a case of' no evidence ' nor a case of no legal evidence ' so as to lead to the conclusion that the findings of the Enquiry Officersuffered from perversity. Even otherwise as argued for the management when there was a findung recordedby this Tribunal holding that the enquiry conducted against the First Party is fair and proper , heavy burden cast upon the shoulders of the First Party to establish before this Tribunal as to how the findings of the enquiry suffered fromperversity.

13039 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

VERSUS

The General Mariager , NIACL , 5th Floor,

DRO- I , Tower II , Jeevan Bharati Building, Cannought Place ,

New Delhi - 110001

AWARD

Thatunder the circumstances , the claimant/workman wasconstrained to lodge his claim before concerned Labour Commissioner (Central) , Curzon Road, New Delhi and there the respondent/ management was summoned and there the management denied the claim of the workman /claimant and stated that he is not their workmen . The discussions were heid and both the parties submitted their please and documents but the settlement could not be reached , and thereafter the matter was referred to this Hon'ble court.

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 17012/ 27/2001 - IR (B - II) Central Government dt. 10-10-2001 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :-

That the action of the management/respondent in terminating the service of the claimant/workman is wrong, illegal , mala fide, uncalled for, unjustified, arbitrary and no chargeshect has been issued and no enquiry has been conducted into the matter in accordance with the principles of natural justice and the termination of the claimant/ workman iswrong , illegal and unwarranted and groundless.

That the workman/ claimant is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages and continuity of services.

"Whether the action of Assistant General Manager, New Delhi and Branch Manager, the New India Assurance Company Limited, Branch Office : 311002, 3, Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bangh, New Delhi - 110005 in stopping from services /duty w.e.f. January, 1998 to Shri Rakesh Kumar, engaged by the company 25 dailywages employee in their Branch Office is valid, justifiedand legal ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to."

The workman applicant has filed statement of claim.

Inthe statement of claim it has been stated that the claimant/ workman was employed as Peon/ Sub- Staff with the respondent/management since 1992 at their branch office at 3 -Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh , New Delhi . The workman has been working and performing his duties diligently, honestly and sincerely and to the entire satisfaction of the management/respondent .

The management had filed the written statement . In the written reply it has been stated that the alleged complaint of Rakesh Kumar is false and it is nothing but abuse of process of the confidence and humanitarian grounds shownby the staff of the branch of the company. It seems that he has been hatching a conspiracy and his intentions were mala fide from the beginning . By winning the confidence of the staff he has been able to procure these letters for which he was not entitled at all nor the persons issuing such letters were authorized to issue the alleged letters . It has been laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Orissa V/ s United India Insurance Co. Ltd. reported as JT 1997 ( 5 ) SC 870 that Manager exceeding the powers without any authority cannot bind the company and such unauthorized acts are not binding on the company. No industrial dispute has arisen and the present petition is liable to be dismissed.

That the workman / Claimant was working continuously since last 6 years and was doing the job of opening the office in the morning and closing the office in the evening. He had been working as Peon/Sub Staff thoughout the day and he had also been performing his duties to deposit the cash in the bank on behalf of he management/ company and also to visit all the concerned office of the management with regard to any act , deed or thing on behalf of the company; he had also been depositing the bills ofthe Telephone , Cheques in the banks and other ancillary works of the respondent/management . The slips of the bank (photo-copies ) regarding the deposits ofthe money with the bank, and the copies of the workman regarding the services rendered by him are also enclosed herewith as annexure 1 to 86 .

That regarding the good service of the clairnant/ workman the appreciation letters were also issued to the claimant/workman by the concerned Branch Manager , Staff Members and the photo -copies of the same are enclosed herewith as annexure 87 to 90.

That all of a sudden the respondent/ management terminated the services of the Workman/Claimant and refused to take him on duty w.e.f. January, 1998. The Workman/Claimant reported for duty again and again but he was not allowed to join the duties and even no reason for the termination of the workman has been disclosed .

That the respondent company is a Government company and there are rules and guidelines to appoint employees . No branch manager of any branch office ofthe company is authorized to appoint any person of his own . The company follows the guidelines and the rules and thereafter an appointment letter is issued and on the basis ofthe said appointment letter a person becomes employee and entitled to salary. In the present case no such letter has been issued to Rakesh Kumar who is not a workman as defined under the Act . No salary whatsoever has been paidto him ever as he was not the employee of the company. Itisvery strange that a person who claims himself to be the employee or alleged appointed on daily wages will keep sum for a period of six years for his salary and will never make any demand nor will serve any letter or notice on the company in this regard. This simple reason and conclunion is that he was aware of the fact that he has never been appointed in the company. It is only on the basis of these documents allegedly stated to have been issued by the Office who had never been authorized to do so nor it was 13040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] within his power and stated to have been issued on humanitarian ground so that he may be above to get employment somewhere else have been misutilized . It may be brought to the notice of this Hon'ble Tribunal that the company has taken action against the said officer and he has been held to be guilty in the inquiry. It is the basic and settled law that any unauthorized action of an employee of the company does not bind the company.

affidavit but he has failed to file the same . So his claim statement is not proved . The case of the workman is that a domestic inquiry was conducted against him and he was found guilty of misconduct . His services were terminated onthe findings of the Inquiry Officer. He was appointed atthe post of Water Boy and in order to make back door entry he has filed this claim . His work was need based so his services cannot be regularized.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the workman applicant was appointed on temporary basis. His employment was need based and he was not office peon. When there was increase of work he was asked to perform his work so he cannot be regularized .

The workman applicant has not filed affidavit in support of his claim statement so his claim statement is not proved.

That there is no post of water boy in the company and therefore there is no question of Rakesh Kumar being appointed as water boy. In fact he wants to make a back door entry for the post of a peon to which he is not entitled. Thatthe copies of the documents referred to in the statement of claim have not been supplied . The company reserves to produce the relevant documents in evidence on receipt of the copies of the documents as well as to file detailed reply in any.

The reference is replied thus:----

That though Mr. Rakesh Kumar has never been appointed as a water boy on daily wages , even then for the sake of arguments it is admitted that he was appointed as a daily wager for a specific purpose , even then he is not entitled for regularization irrespective of the period he allegedly claims to have worked for, as laid down by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Delhi State Industrial Corporation Limited Vs. J.K. Thakur reported as 2001 (9) DLT 738 .

The action of Assistant General Manager, New Delhi and Branch Manager, the New India Assurance Company Limited, Branch Office: 311002, 3 , Arya Smaj Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi - 110005 in stopping from services /duty w.e.f. January, 1998 to Shri Rakesh Kumar, engaged by the company as daily wages employce in their Branch Office isvalid, justified and legal . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The Award is given accordingly.

Date : 25-10-2005.

R. N.RAI , PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4444. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैप पब्लिकेशन सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 170/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

That true facts are that Rakesh Kumar has been working as a canteen boy in the Branch Office, Karol Bagh , New Delhi for a sufficient long time . During this duration it seems that employee of the company have been assigning some small jobs unauthorizedly for their own comforts which cannot bind the company. And Rakesh Kumar who seems to be planning from the very beginning , has been keeping track of the same with a malafide intentions . He has never been employed by the company nor he has ever been paid any salary during the said period. And a person who claims himselfto be an employee of the company cannot survive for six years without getting any salary. The whole story is concocted andwell planned in order to get the employment to which he is not entitled . His name is nowhere entered in the muster roll of the company and nor he has been ever marked present in the records of the company.

[सं. एल-42012/182/96- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th October , 2005

S.O. 4444. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 170/ 97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexurc in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Map Publication Survey of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-10-2005

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The case was fixed on 21-09-2004 for affidavit of the workman. The workman was not present on 16-05-2004. He was not present on 14-02-2005 . He was present on 02-05-2005 but he did not file affidavit . He was not present on 18th July, 2005 and no affidavit was filed. Last opportunity was given. The workman was not present on 12th October, 2005 so the opportunity of filing affidavit wasclosed and the case was reserved for award .

[No. L -42012 / 182/ 96 - IR ( DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer The workman has been given sufficient ime to file 13041 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT II , NEW DELHI

I. D. No. 170/1997

Presiding Officer : R. N. Rai

Inthe Matter of:----

That the O.P. has not permitted the applicant to work w.c. f. 1-2-1995 and terminated his services malafidely in violation of provisions of Industrial disputes act illegally in order to avoid regularization of the services of the applicant/ complaint in the department . His wages for last several months has also not been paid by the opposite Party for which separate application before the prescribed authority is being filed .

Sh . Raghubir Singh S/o Sh . Surender Singh R/ o 26 , E. C. Road, Dehradun .

VERSUS

Additional Surveyor General ,

That the interview for the said vacant post of ' safaiwala ' are scheduled for 22-2-1995 and the O.P. is admend to fill the post by outsider women candidate and the applicant is not called evern for Interview, while he is entitled and competent for the regularization for that post.

Map Publications,

Survey of India , Hathi Barkala, Dehradun .

That the conduct of the O.P. is malafide and violative of the provisions of Induatrial dispute act and constitution ofIndia and the cocept of social justice .

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. 42012/ 182 / 96, IR (DU) CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DT. 14-10-1997 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder:-

That there are some other vacancies also for Safaiwala which occurred due to retirement and death of two other employee ( Safaiwala) in the department , but the O.P. adopting unfair labour practice did not give regular employment to him.

"Whether the action of the Management Additional Surveyor General , Map Publication Survey of India , Dehradun in terminating the services of Shri Raghubeer Singh , Ex- daily Wages Safaiwala w.e.f. 01-12-1995 is just fair and legal , if not waht relief he is entitled to and from what to do . "

That the post against which the workmen was working is permanent and still existing . The nature and duties of the workman was same as the regular worker as working . That piror to termination the applicant workman has completed more than 240 days in every and each calendar year of service .

The Workman applicant has filed claim statement. In the claim statement it has been stated that the opposite party employer is an industrial establishment and having printing units which are covered by the definition of factory and hence, it covers under the Chapter V- B of I.D. Act . It is pertinent to mention here that there are more than 100 workers working with the O.P.

Thatthe applicant has a legitimate expectation after serving more than 6 years as dialy wages that he will be considered for regularization but the management by using its colourable managing powers with ulterior motives even not calling to the applicant for interview also terminated the services of the applicant /workman by engaging outsider in permanent post .

The management has fileld written statement . In the written statement it has been stated that the fact is that the survey of India is not an Industrial Establishment and as such the case does not fall under the purview of the Industrial Despute Act . Hence this authority has no jurisdiction to deal with the matter.

That the applicant workman was engaged by the opposite Party in its Map Publication Section 103 ( PZQ) Printing Group as safai wala, on Casual basis. The applicant worked for some days in 1988 in the above section and thereafter as he has been working in the department for last more than 5 years continuously and under law he is entitled for regularization for the said vacant post.

That the O.P. having received the said letter of the Akhil Bhartiya Balmiki Samaj Vikas Parishad and the application of the applicant become annoyed and asked the complainant applicant not to work in the office and told that he will not regularized the complainant/applicant. Rather he would terminated his services as Casual workman also, and also told the applicant that the vacant post will be filled in by an outsider workmen candidate .

The service of the applicant was obtained on contract basis for cleaning office , cutting grass etc. The applicant was not given further contract of cleaning etc. All the dues payable to the applicant have already been paid and no payment ofwages as mentioned in para 9 is pending in the office .The name of the applicant for the post of Safaiwala was not sponsored by local Employment Exchange . This establihment does not fall under the pruview of Industrial Dispute Act . The applicnat's service was procured purely on contract bacis from time to time but not long period as stated .

The workman applicnat has filed rejoinder . In his rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most of the Thatthe work of Safaiwala is not such a work which canonly be done by a lady women and the applicant and many other male workman has been working as Safaiwala, in the office of O.P. satisfactorily and it will be against the fundamental rights of constitution of India to discriminate on the basis or sec . in appointment for service.

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

13042

paras of the claim statement . The workman applicant has filed affidavit and he has been cross examined by the management . The management has also filed affidavit but the workman did not turn up from 11-5-2005 . He was not present on 12-7-2005, 01-09-2005 , 28-09-2005 so the witness of the respondent has not been cross examined by the workman . His affidavit will prevail . The case of the management is that he was given work on daily basis and oncontract basis. The management is not an Industry. The management is an Industry in view of the Bangalore Water Supply. The workman has left the case . He has not cross examined the management witness and the case of the management is that his appointment was contractual so the affidavit of the management witness will prevail. In the reference the term ex daily safaiwala . The case of the management is that he was contractual daily rated worker and he was paid for the days he worked. His appointment was need based. The applicant has not proved the averments of his claim statement .

The reference is replied thus:-

The action of the management Additional Surveyor General , Map Publication Survey of India , Dehradun in terminating the services of Shri Raghubir Singh , Ex -daily wages Safaiwala we.f. 01-12-1995 is just, fair and legal . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

TheAward is given accordingly.

Dated 24-10-2005

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4445 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीमेंट कार्पोरेशन ऑफ इण्डिया लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली सं. II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42011 /3/92- आई आर ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम . डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 28th October , 2005

S.O. 4445 In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 24/ 1993) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court New Delhi No.II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cement Corpn. of India Ltd. and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 28-10-2005

[No. 42011/3/92 - IR (M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT - II, NEW DELHI

I. D. No. 24/1993

Presiding Officer : R. N. Rai

In the Matter of:--

The General Secretary, Cement Corporation of India Karamchari Union, Charkhi Dadri , Haryana

VERSUS

The General Manager, Cement Corporation of India Limited, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. 42011 /3/92- IR (Misc. ) CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DT. 21-02/03-1993 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :--

"Whether the action of the management of Cement Corporation of India Limited, Charkhi Dadri in not giving the minimum wages to the ex - employces of the DDCL and in employing them as a trainees on the basis of stipend of Rs.550 /- per month without protracting their previous wages after taking over the management by the CCI , Limited is fair, just and legal? If not , to what relief they are entitled and from what date . "

AND

"Whether the action and of the management of CementCorporation of India Limited Charkhi Dadri in relationto charging penal rent @ Rs. 100/ per month from Shri khub Chand for the vacant portion of the house isjust, fair and legal ?If not, to what relief he is entitled and from what date . "

The Union on behalf of the workmen has filed statement of claim . In the statement ofclaim it is stated that the Charkhi Dadri Cement Unit is one of the 11 Units of CCI Ltd. which is a Government of India Undertaking. This unit was carlier owned by Dalmia management as Dalmia Dadri Cement Limited. The former Dalmia management declared the illegal closure of said unit on 18-3-1980 terminating the services of all the workmen therein except 95 without making payment of their legal dues and compensation as required under Section 25F and 25FFF of the ID Act , 1947.

That on persistent demand of the workers the Government of India took over the said closed unit and handed over the same to CCI Limited on 23-6-1981 under Presidential Ordinance which was later on replaced by Dalmia Dadri Cement Limited , Transfer of undertaking and acquisition Act , 1981. This was done mainlyto 13043

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

The other service conditions of workmen employed inCharkhi Dadri Cement Unit have been governed under Model.standing orders framed by Central Govt . under the Rules of Industrial Employment (S.O. ) Act, 1946. The management got their own standing order certified and notified applicability during Oct. Nov. 1990 .

provide employment to the workers who had been rendered jobless as stated above . Modalities of recruitment of ex - employees were discussed and settled between the Unions of the workers and the CCI Management under the minutes of understandings signed during November , 1981 and it was decided that recruitment out ofex-employees would be made on the principle of seniority alone . Category -wise seniority lists were accordingly drawn and re -employment of ex - employees was started. It was further decided by the CCI Management that last pay drawn by the employees with the former management would be protected while making re - employment.

That tentative lists of workers covered under Item No. 1 of the reference and as has been stated in para 4 and 6 above are being submitted separately along with documents . The completed list however, will be submitted atthe time of evidence . All these workers have been doing the kind ofwork either at the time when they were engaged on daily rated basis or they were appointed as ' TRAINEES ' .

That the strength ofthe employees in Charkhi Dadri unit at the time of closure by former management was 1600 workers . But CCI Management determined the manpower strength for Charkhi Dadri unit as 862 workmen. Remaining surplus employees were given the option to get the benefits of Rs . 10,000/-each as rehabilitation compensation leaving his right of re - employment under rehabilitation compensation schenie sanctioned by the Government of India providing a fund of Rs . 80,00,000 /-.

That the above workers have not been given the minimum wage as per Cement Arbitration Award and Settlement for which they were legally entitled. No other benefit and facility as enjoyed by the other regular workers was given to these workers such as leave and Holidays , bonus , Medical Attendant benefits , PF and gratuity etc. This action of the management is not only illegal and unjustified but also amounts to victimization and unfair labour practice.

Thatother item or reference relates to illegal deauction of Rs. 100/ - P.M. from the wages of Sh. Khub Chand Tally Checkers since November 1987 .

That the CCI Management however , started functioning in a arbitrary manner ignoring the principle of seniority and pay - protection of ex -employees and indulged in unfair labout practice . The management started recruitment of ex - employees as " Trainces " by paying them morithly stipend of Rs . 550 / - per month and item No. 1 on the present Industrial Dispute/Reference order relates to such matter.

That Sh. Khub Chand T.C. has been working in Charkhi Dadri Cement Unit since 1966 at the time of former management of DDCL . His service were also terminated at the time of closure on 18-3-1980 . He was re -employed by theCCI Management on 1-7-1983.

Thatwages / pay scales of workers in Cement Industry including that of Charkhi Dadri Cement Unit are governed under Cement Wage Board , all India awards and settlements. The main award and settlements are as under:

(a) Cement Arbitration Award 1978 ..

(b ) Cement Arbitration Award dt. 11-7-1983 Published in Govt. of India Gaz . dt . 20-7-1983.

That Sh . Khub Chand was allotted a quarter in the colony by the erstwhile management of DDCL which continued even after takeover of the Company by CCI Management and his re -employment . In addition to the allotted quarter he is also having some additional accommodation near his quarter a Jhuggi as Cow - shed as he is keeping a cow like other workers in the colony. A sum of Rs. 11.50 per month is being charged as House Rent recovery for the alloted quarter and a sum of Rs. 100/- P.M. ischarged as Penal Rent for Jhugi from Sh. Khub Chand bythe CCI Management .

(d) Settlementdt . 31-7-92 signed between the parties before the Chief Labor Commissioner New Delhi .

That large number of workers are living in the colony/ CCI Township who are also having or enjoying the benefit of additional accommodation/Jhuggies or Sheds besides their regularly allotted quarters without making payment of any house rent or Penal Rent and some of the workers are enjoying the facility of better and bigger type of Shed than the Shed of Khub Chand who has been singled out and being treated discriminatory by the CCI Management which is not only illegal and unjustified bui au act ofunfair labour practice and victimization . He has submitted so many representations to the management but without any result.

That although the above awards and settlements are legally applicable and binding upon CCI Management but contraryto this management started payment less than the minimum wages fixed for various categories of employees . The management started engagement of ex- employees on daily rated basis by paying them less wages other than the wages fixed under Cement Arbitration Award and Settlement . The engagement of such ex - employees on daily rated basis and their payments at the initial stage was started by the CCI Management in the year 1982-83 through some arrangement ofCo -op. Societies and from 1986 onward directly by CCI although throughout the entire period the control remained in the hands of the CCI Management .

The management has filed written statement. In the written statement it has been stated that the ex -employees of DDCL who were taken as Trainees on a stipend of 13044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927 [PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

time to time. These Trainees were kept for one year but they were regularized in grades on absorption as workers with the respondent and they were given the grades permissible to their respective jobs .

Rs . 550/- per month by the management of M/ s . Cement Corporation of India Ltd. , and were subsequently absorbed inGrade ' E ' of the wage board by virtue of the Settlement dated 22-1-1991 arrived at between the management and the C.C.I. Cement Factory Men Union, Charkhi Dadri (aRecognized Union ) representing the workmen in matter . In terms of the settlement dated 22nd January , 1991 the ex -employees of DDCL were paid wages in ' E ' Grade after the expiry of6 months training period . It is subinitted that by virtue of this settlement no dispute in respect of item No.1 under the heading " Schedule " to the Order of Reference existed between the parties on and after 22nd January, 1991 and therefore no reference in respect of a concluded matter could have been made for adjudication . Thepresent order of reference, in so far as it relates to item No. 1 under the heading " Schedule " is therefore bad in law and no adjudication can thus take place on the basis of the same .

It is incorrect that the closure of DDCL was ever declared illegal . The matter was duly negotiated by the Government and in the interest of the general public this unit was taken over by the Central Government and was re- vested with the respondent . The pertinent point for consideration is that the DDCL was employing nearly 1600 employees and the unit became non-viable because of excessive strength and less /negligible production . A team ofexperts was constituted at the time of take over and it was considered that drastic steps are required to make this unit viable . The strength of employees required as assessed as 830 in the factory as well as in the mines .

Thatthe CCI Cement Factory Men's Union, Charkhi Dadri (A Recognized Union ) raised a demand for payment of " E " Grade wages to the Trainees who were the ex- employees ofDDCL after completion of six months of their training period protecting their basic pay last drawn on 18-3-1980 and in respect of this demand after prolonged discussions a settlement dated 22-1-1991 was arrived at between the management and the Union. In terms of the settlement it was agreed by and between the parties to the settlement that the ex- employees of DDCL who have been engaged as trainees on a stipend of Rs . 550/- per month between 1-12-1989 and 3-7-1990 for one year shall be paid wages of " E " Grade worker of Cement Wage Board after the expiry of six months training from the date ofjoining and they will be appointed in " E " Grade after satisfactory completion of training period of one year. In terms of this settlement it was also agreed that arrears of wages of such ofthe Trainees who have already completed six months of their training period shall be paid in three instalments during the months ofFebruary, April and July, 1991. It is submitted that the arrears were paid by the management and were duly accepted bythe ex-employees of the DDCL who were engaged as trainees. The ex - employees of DDCL after the said settlement and more so after having taken the benefits ofthe settlement are bound by it and no dispute much less anIndustrial Dispute can be raised in respect of a settled and concluded matter either by the ex - employees of the DDCL or anyone else . Here it may not be out of place to mention that most of these workers belonged to the mines and queries of DDCL and thus were not having any knowledge/ experience of working in the factory and therefore some practical training was not only required but was a must for them . It was just to help them for getting absorbed in the CCI Unit at Charkhi Dadri .

According to the enactment it was not incumbent upon the respondent to appoint the ex -employees ofDalmia Dadri Cement Limited . However, as a gesture of goodwill , the respondent negotiated the matter with the working force in the plant and recruited the ex - employees on seniority basis in various categories to the required strength of830. This recruitment was effected on seniority basis in respective categories according to the requirement strength in that category Apart from it the respondent management studied the wage structure and the same was not found to be according to the Cement Wage Board Awards and even most of the employces , who were kept by the management of DDCL, were not according to the jobs specifications and qualifications . However, as a gesture of goodwill the respondent management protected the basic pay of the ex-employees who were fitted with the trained and qualified employees of the CCI for providing technical know -how and skill for the jobs.

None of the employees/ applicants were kept on daily rated basis by the respondent . It is however , admitted that "The Dadri Cement Factory Ex - employees Co - operative Labourand Construction Society Limited" was formulated by and under the guidance of Shri B.S. Prabhakar the then President of the CCI Cement Factory Men's Union and the person perusing the matter before this Hon'ble Court on behalf of the applicants . The respondent management for civil capital contract was providing wages as applicable in Haryana plus 45% and 5 % charges to the said Ex- employees Society. This Society was not under the control or supervision of the respondent management but was being regulated by the union itself under the then President Shri Bhim Sain Prabhakar. None of the applicants were engaged directly by the respondent in 1986 as alleged nor any contracior employce was ever engaged directly as alleged.

It is pointed out that according to the appointment orders the Model Standing Orders as applicable in the State of Haryana were made applicable and subsequently the It is pointed that none of the principles initiated by the respondent at the time of recruitment were ever violated . Apart from it DDCL ex -employees Society was floatedto provide contract/ employment wherever civil capital nature ofwork accrues . In the year 1989 only the persons were kept as Trainee to cope up with the requirement of the working of the Corporation with the intention to provide them sufficient know - how for adjustment after six months against the sanctioned posts which accrues on account of retirement or expected incr mod stopth from [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Standing Orders were approved by the Certifying Authority of the Central Government and the appeal was also disposed of by the Appellate Authority and the same has been made applicable after the decision of the appeal filed by the workers.

Asstated above the respondent have never engaged the applicants as daily rated employees as mentioned in the preceding paras but it is admitted that these persons were kept as Trainees on specific jobs and after the period oftraining they were regularized on that particular job.

It is pointed out that applicants were absorbed as workers and they got wages according to the Award/ Settlement in their respective grade and also enjoyed all the benefits and facilities as per the said grade in respect of holidays, bonus , medical facilities , PF etc. The pleadings made in this para are vague as different persons were engaged at different time and under different contract by the respondent and as a Trainee they are not workers for the purpose of the Award or the Settlement. During training they enjoyed all the benefits in terms of contract oftraining.

The applicant Khub Chand was alloted Qtr . No. AA- 14 and on his request in 1985 he was given temporary possession of Qtr . No. AA - 14 . The applicant was asked to give back the possession of the said quarter for providing the same to other employees who are entitled as per the terms and conditions of their employment but the applicant did not vacate the quarter inspite of repeated reminders and penal rent was charged from him. Penal rent isbeing charged from other employees too . According to the scheme for providing residential accoınmodation to the employces a person having personal accommodation in Charkhi Dadri cannot avail the house accommodation of the Company. Applicant has own house in Charkhi Dadri and he cannot have either of the houses in the Company accommodation. Even otherwise the applicant cannot avail two quarters .

It is pointed out that the applicant was having the accommodation of quarter No. AA - 14 and was not given additional accommodation ofjhugi as cow - shed as alleged. He was given residential accommodation in quarter No. AA - 14 which is not a cow - shed as alleged in the year 1985 fortemporary basis as per his request . Concessional sum ofRs . 11.5t) is being charged as the applicant is availing the facility according to his condition of employment and for quarter No.A.A- 14 the amount of Rs . 100/ - is being charged as penal rent as the same was not allotted according to the terms and conditions of the employment . The applicant is inthe illegal possession of the said quarter and is debarring the right of other employees who are entitled to the house accommodation .

The applicant is not having additional accommodation as a shed but is having the illegal possession of residential quarter in house No. AA- 40 . It is incorrect that any employee is having double accommodation as alleged or no rent is being charged from them. It is further pointed out that temporary possession was never given to other employees who are keeping illegal possession even after temporary period. Althought the 3276 G1 /05-24

13045

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

clause for penal rent is specific and known to them too. The applicant has not been singled out as alleged and he be asked to give the vacant possession of the said quarter No.AA-40 to accommodates the other employees and the action of the applicant is unjustified one . For the benefits of his co -employees the applicant should have given the possession of the other quarter to the Company for allotment to other waiting employces as the applicant is owning a house in Charkhi Dadri and does not fall within the peripheries of the scheme. The union be asked to serve the cause of the other employees as per the scheme and not to raise unjustified and illegal issues in this manner .

The General Secretary of Karamchari Union Charkhi Dadri has filed rejoinder on behalf of the workmen . In his rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most the paras ofthe claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

It was submitted from the side of the union that settlement dated 22-01-1991 entered into between the management representatives and workmen representatives is not legal one. Shri Ishwar Singh , President, Shri H.S. Sudi , V. President & Shri Bhagmal , General Secretary and Shri J.R. Balbir , Legal Secretary are not the real representatives of the workmen . The management should have entered into settlement with recognized union Cement Corporation of India Karamchari Union, Charkhi Dadri . The management in order to achieve its aim entered into agreement with the representatives of the union which is not of representative character of the real union. The Cement Corporation of India Karamchari Union is the real union and the management has not entered into any settlement with this union so this settlement is illegal and arbitrary and it has been obtained in order to deprive the workmen of their legitimate claims and due wages .

Itisadmittedto both the parties that agreement dated 22-01-1991 was signed between the representatives of both the sides and copy of the same was sent to the Labour Commissioner. An employee was summoned and she came with register in which the agreement dated 22-01-1991 has beengiven entry. The union has admitted that the agreement dated 22-01-1991 was entered into by the representative of the Union of CCI Cement Factory Mens ' Union .

From persual of the affidavit of Shri Bhim Singh Prabhakar, Vice President of the Cement Corporation Employees Union that the original union prior to taking overof the said factory was Dalmia Dadri Cement Factory Mens ' Union and subsequently its name was changed as CCI Cement Factory Men's Union . The CCI Cement Factory Mens' Union has entered into agreement dated 22-01-1991 . It is alleged that the CCI Cement Factory Mens ' Union is not empowered to enter into agreement dated 22-01-1991. The agreement has no legal sanctity and the ex -employees of the DDCL cannot be employed as Trainees . They are entitled to get all their arrears prescribed by the Cement [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

13046

WageBoard . It is quite explicit from perusal of the affidavit thatCCI Cement Mens ' Union was recognized in DDCL. It has got its name changed i.e CCI Cement Factory Mens ' Union . It cannot be said by any stretch of imagination that CCI Cement Factory Mens ' Union is an unrecognized union. It is alleged that the management has entered into the agreement as a result of collusion with Cement Factory Mens Union . DDCL was closed so the Government took over that Factory and a study team was directed to give report regarding mänpower requirement. As per the report of the study team there was requirement of only 862 workmenwhereas 1600 workmen were employed in DDCL when it was taken over by the Government of India. The study team has reported that Factory employed total 1600 persons at the time of closure in March, 1978. Most of the Key post had been lying vacant sine long. The organization at executive and supervisory level particularly in technology discipline was almost non -existent. For revival ofthe plant the organizational structure would needdrastic revamping to be more effective and meaningful .

Itwas submitted from the side of the responents that it was not possible to absorb all the ex- employees of DDCL so on 02-12-1989 a list of the ex - employees accordingto seniority was prepared and Rs . 550/ - per month was to be paid during the training period.

Itwas further submitted that an agreement was reached in 1989 with INTUC ( Haryana ) and AITUC i.e CFPW Union. According to this agreement it was decided that recruitment will be made out of the ex -employees on seniority basis alone and interview will be taken by the selection Board and employees will be selected on the basis oftheir age, health and seniority. So in view of the agreement of 1989 employees are to be selected out of ex -employees of DDCL . It was not possible to absorb all the employees so the management entered into agreement dated 22-01-1991 with CCF and a list was prepared and according to that list the employees who could not be absorbed and the ex -employees who could not be absorbed in view of the report of the study team were taken as trainees and Rs . 550/- was paid to them . The contention of the claimant union is that the management with malafide intention to deprive the workmen of their due wages entered into agreement dated 22-01-1991. The CCI Cement Factory Mens ' Union was against the agreement of 1989. There is no pre -condition in the agreement of 1989 according to which all the ex -employees of the DEDCL are to be absorbed . There is no clause in the Gazette of India extra- ordinary dated 15th September 1981 that all the employees ofDDCI will be absorbed . So the study team was organized to report as to requirement of manpower strength and the studyteam reported that only 862 employees are required whereas in DDCI there were 1600 employees. The study team also reported that the employees are not properly trained. In view of the report of the study team the management wanted to give training to the ex- employees of DDCL and to absorb them after technical training . The ex-employees of CCI applied in view of agreement dated 22-01-1991 . Their individual consent of declaration was sought and all the trainees and the ex -employees of CCI declared that they have fully read and understood the memorandum and settlement under Section 18 ( 1 ) of the ID Act , 1947 signed between the management of the Cement Corporation of India Limited, Charkhi Dadri and CCI Mens ' Union on 22nd January , 1991 in regard to the payment of "E" grade wages on expiry of 6 (six) months training as per clause I of the terms of settlement and arrears in three installments vide clause 2 as well as clause 3 of the said settlement and gave their consent for the same .

All theex-employees of DDCL have made declaration thatthey are conversant with the terms of agreement dated 22-01-1991 and they have availed themselves of all the benefits under the agreement impugned .

Itwas further submitted from the side of the management that the claimant uniori has not filed any document to prove the fact that all the trainees were members of their union in CCI . It transpires from perusal of the documents that these candidates have not been found suitable for absorption on the basis of their seniority so they could not be absorbed but the management took a lenient view and on humanitarian ground made an attempt toutilize their services . The ex -employees of DDCL prior to take over had not technical education or know how working ofCement Factory as such in order to properly equip them with professional know how the management embarked upon the scheme of training them so that they could be absorbed subsequently. It is no doubt good gesture on the part of the management to absorb the ex- employees of the DDCL after imparting them professional training and technical know how. It cannot be said that the management was in collusion with any other union . The ex -employees trainees opted for the agreement dated 22-01-1991 and made declared that the agreement is valid one and they have given their consent to the enforcement of that agreement. As such agreement dated 22-01-1991 was arrived in consultation with a major union CCI Cement Factory Mens' Union. The claimant union objected to the same but the workmen despite the objections of the claimant union made declarations and gave their consent to the terms and conditions ofthe agreement dated 22-01-1991 .

Itwas submitted from the side of the claimant union that the workman have been deprived of due wages and the management has entered into agreement aforesaid in collusion with another union . The party to the agreement aforesaid is a recognized union and it has not entered into agreement aforesaid in view of any collusion or with malafide intention but in view of absorption of the ex- employees of DDCL . As such the agreement aforesaid cannot be said to be illegal and arbitrary agreement to deprive the workmen of their due wages . On the other hand the agreement aimed at absorbing all the ex - employees of DDCL and ex -employees have been trained and absorbed . Aunion is for the welfare of the workmen . The ex-employces of DDCL cannot be said to be the employees of the CCI prior to their absorption . The agreement entered into cannot 13047

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

have agreed to the settlement so this case is also not applicable in the present facts and circumstances of the case.2003 LLR 887 Punjab and Haryana & 1994 ( 1 ) LLR 926 Bombay are not applicable in the present facts and circumstances of the case .

be assailed as the claimant union was not a party to the same . The aforesaid agreement has been entered into for providing employment to the ex - employces of DDCL so that the agreement does not intend to deprive the workinen oftheir duc wages as per the Cement Wage Board . The ex- employees could claim only retrenchment compensation and not employment in view ofexcess manpower force .

It was submitted from the side of the management that the major recognized union is a party to the settlement dated 22-01-1991 and it has been implemented and the ex- employees have given their consent for enforcement of the terms and conditions of the settlement so this settlement cannot be illegal . The interest of the ex - employces ofDDCL is ofparamount importance and in case the ex- employees have given their consent and they have availed of the benefits of agreement dated 22-01-1991 it cannot be said to be illegal and arbitrary agreement .

It was submitted from the side of the management thatit is not obligatory on the management to make all the recognized unions party to MOU . The agreement has been signed by a major union which was active in DDCL also . That agreement cannot be rendered invalid for the simple reason that the claimant union has not been made party to that agreement . When all the ex -employees have availed all the benefits of that agreement , that agreement cannot be said to be against the interest of the ex - employees of the DDCL as they have declared and confirmed hat they have understood that agreement and they have given their consent for the same .

It was submitted from the side of the management that in case substantial members of any unior declare themselves bound by the agreement , in that case they no longer remain the member of the union. In the instant case all the ex -employees who have been posted as trainees have made declaration to the effect that they have conceded to the terms and conditions of the aforesaid settlement dated 22-01-1991 so they have separated themselves from the claimant union and they shall be deemed to be the members of the union party to the said agreement .

Itwas submitted from the side of the claimant union that the management has realized penal rent @ Rs . 100/- per month from Shri Khub Chand from the vacant portion of the house . Shri Khub Chand has filed affidavit and documents. It stands proved that the quarter for which penal rent has been realized is not in a habitable condition. This is abandoned quarter. The workman has taken possession of a part of that quarter and has spent money in its repair . The management should have objected at the time of taking over of possession of the quarter but the management kept silent and when the workman has carried out major repairs the management declared the possession illegal and realized penal rent from him. The management has not filed reply to the affidavit of the workman . He has givennames of other employees who have been using the abandoned quarters and no penal rent has been charged from them . The management cannot charge penal rent of a quarter which is not in a habitable condition . The rent is realized for the quarters in which human beings can dwell . In the present case according to the documents of the management itself the quarter is not fit for residence. In case where a quarter cannot be given on rent , penal rent cannot be realized . At present possession is obtained by the respondents . So the realization of penal rent from the workman Shri Khub Chand is not just , fair and legal. The workman is entitled to be paid back the entire penal rent recovered from him.

The reference is replied thus:-

1. The action of the management of Cement Corporation of India Limited, Charkhi Dadri in not giving the minimum wages to the ex- employees of the DDCL and in employing them as a trainees on the basis of stipend of Rs. 550/- per month without protecting their previous wages after taking over the management by the CCI , Limited is fair just and legal.

2. The action of the management of Cement Corporation of India Limited, Charkhi Dadri in relation to charging penal rent is not just , fair and legal . The respondents are directed to pa My attention was drawn to 1972 ( I ) LLJ Page 1999 SC. It has been held that a union which originally espouse the cause of the concerned workman in regard to the validity of his retirement entered into settlement with the managernent during pendency of conciliation proceedings and agreeing not to prosecute his case , such settlement is not a valid settlement. The claimant union has not established the fact that the ex - employees appointed as trainees were exclusively the members of the claimant union. All the ex-employees have given their consent to the agreement and none of the employees has filed any affidavit inthis instant case . So it cannot be taken to be proved that ex -employees authorized the claimant union to espouse their cause . My attention was drawn to 1983 (62 ) FLR 356 Page 64. The instant case is not applicable in view of the facts and circumstances of the present case . It has been held in 1991 LLR 481 Delhi that in case a union does not participate in the meeting it cannot be said that terms and settlement of the meeting are binding on the union. The workmen have accepted the terms and conditions of the agreement despite the objections of the claimant union so it is not material whether the claimant union is a party to the settlement or not. This case is also not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case . In 2002 II CLR 395 it has been held that the manpower of the recognized union by a settlement cannot decide the fate of workman by agreeing to terminate their services in violation of provisions of the law. In the present case the workmen [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5, 1927

13048

back to the workman the entire amount of penal rent deducted from the salary of the workman withintwo months from the date ofpublication ofthe award.

The Award is given accordingly.

Date: 27-10-2005 .

R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4446- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय भूसर्वेक्षण के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण गुवाहाटी के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 9 ( C) /2003 ] को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं एल-42012/240/2002- आई.आर. ( सीएम 11 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th October, 2005

S.O. 4446 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. 9(C)/2003 ] of the Industrial Tribunal Guwahati as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Geological Survey of India and their workman , received by the Central Government on 28-10-2005.

[No. L -42012 /240/ 2002 - IR ( CM - II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , ASSAM , GUWAHATI

Reference No. 9 (C) of 2003

PRESENT :

Shri B. Bora, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal , Guwahati

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute between:

The Management of Geological Survey of India, Shillong Vs

Their workman rep . by the General Secy. Shillong Cantonment Board Employces Union. Shillong Date ofAward: 18-7-05

AWARD

TheGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour. New Delhi by a notification No. L - 42012 / 240/ 2002 IR ( CM - II )dt . 17-4-03 referred an Industrial Dispute between the management of Geological Survey of India . Shillong and theirworkman Smt . Amarjeet Kaur , Sweeper on the following issue:

"Whether the action of the management of Deputy Director General Geological Survey of India ( NER ) Shillong in terminating the services of Smt . Amarjeet Kaur, Sweeper w.e.f. August 01 without observing the provisions of law and also denying for reinstatement is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief she is entitled to ? "

Onreceipt of reference , a reference case was registered and notices were issued both parties calling upon them to file their written statements/ addl . written statements and documents if any. In response to the notices both parties appeared in this court and filed their written statements .

Both parties also a used evidence both oral and documentary in support of their respective cases .

The management raised preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the reference in its present form .

Heard the learned counsels for the parties . Gonc through the record .

Itisdecided to hear the preliminary issues first and the issue is framed : Whether the reference in its present form is maintainable or not ?

By this Award I propose to dispose of the petition of the management files on 04-06-05 by which the management has challenged the Jurisdiction of this Tribunal to adjudicate the reference . The main plank of the management is that the Geological Survey of India ( herein after mentioned as G.S.I. ) is a sovereign Deptt . of Govt. of India and therefore, it does not come within the preview of the 1.D. Act. Hence , the reference is not maintainable. This reference is pending since 17-4-03 .

The workman on the other hand , stated that the petitiondt . 04-06-05 on maintainability of the reference is an after thought and belated one and therefore , cannot be tenable at this stage after completion of evidence of the partics . The workman stated that the Management has filed this petition to veil its failure to produce some documents relied upon by them and applied for the copies of these documents by the workman etc.

Be that as it may, let me examine the question of maintainability of the reference. The objection is raised by the management mainly on the ground that as the GSI is a Sovereign Deptt . of the Govt . of India it does not come within the purview of the definition of ' Industry as envisaged by Section 2 ( J ) of the 1.D. Act ( hereinafter referred to as the Act).

Section 2 ( J ) of the Act defines ' Industry as " Industry" means : any systematic activity carried on by co-operation between an employer and his workmen (whether such workmen are employed by such employer directly or by or through any agency , including a contractor ) for the production , supply or distribution of goods or services with a view to satisfy human wants or wishes(not being wants or wishes which are inerely spiritual 13049 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

employees and there is a jural relation of employer and employees . But let us see as a result of the " organised activities " any " goods" is produced or service is rendered or not?

or religious in nature ) whether or not .... But Section 2(6 ) of the Act has excluded : any activity of the Government relatable to the sovereign functions of the Government including all the activities carried on by the departments of the Central Government dealing with Defence Research , Atomic Energy and Space .

From the charter of activities of the GSI . It is seen thatpreparation of Geological, Geophysical , Geochemical maps of the whole country and the off- shore areas , to explore and assess mineral resources of the country etc. are the main functions .

On a perusal of this provision, it transpires that " any activity of the Govt . relatable to the sovereign functions of the Govt . " along with the activities carried on by the Deptt . of Defence Research, Atomic Energy and Space of the Central Govt . arc excluded from the preview of the definition of Industry.

These functions of the GS1 are of purely scientific in nature and by such activities it procures some fundamental datas of earth science which can be useful to its further research . No goods are produced or services are rendered by such research works for satisfaction of human wants or wishes.

Inthis connection we may refer to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Physical Research Laboratory Vs. K. G. Sarmah II LLJ Supreme Court of India 1997 p . 625 wherein it was held that the appellant i.e. Physical Research Laboratory was not an industry even though it was counting on the activity of research on a systematic manner with the help of its employees , as it lacked that element which would make it an organisation carrying on an activity which could be said to be analogous to the carrying on of trade or business because it was not producing goods and distributing services which were intended or meant for satisfying human wants and needs , as ordinarily understood .

Now, let us examine as to what are the sovereign functions of the Govt . ? The phrase sovereign function has nowhere been defined in the Act . Thedictionary meaning of the work Sovereign is supreme in power; possessing supreme dominion or Jurisdiction ; royal free of outside influence or control ; etc. ( the Lexicon Webster Dictionary, Vol . II page 930 ) . So , the Departments , which deal with the Sovereign functions , of the Central Govt. have absolute control of free from outside influence . In that sense, these Deptts. of the Central Govt . are autonomous bodies i.e. subject to their own laws only. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa ( 1978 ) 2 SCC 213 stated that even in departments discharging sovereign functions , if there are units which are industries , and they are substantially severable then they can be considered to comewithin Section 2 (j ) of the Act.

By the same decision the Hon'ble Apex Court also held that the clubs , educational institutions , co - opératives , research institutions .... Which could be looked upon as organised activity where there was a relationship of employer and employee and goods were produced or service was rendered .

Though it was held in the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa ( 1978-1 - LLJ SC 349 ) that research institutions are also industry if they fulfil the triple tests i.e. ( i) Systematic activity, ( ii ) organized by Co-operationbetween employer and employee and (iii ) for the Production and/ or distribution of goods and services for satisfaction of human wants or wishes . In the case in hand the 3rd element is found to be absent .

That being so , the research institutions , are also industry if any organized activity is carried on by such institutions and there is a relation of the employers and employees and goods are produced or service is rendered .

Let us took into the activities carried on by the GSI .

The learned counsel for the management has supplied us with the " Charter Relating to the Functions and responsibilities of the GS1 . " Clause 4 of the Charter states that one of the function of the GSI among others is to " To undertake systematic studies and research in all Sub- disciplines of earth science and methods and techniques ofexplanation and sensing" .

Before parting with this matter in hand, let me make it clear that the G.S.I. is not performing any sovereign functions as claimed by the learned counsel for the management. Sovereign functions of a state are those functions , which the state has some constitutional obligation for performing these functions by its own organisation keeping the national security, integrity etc. in mind. Some functions of the states can not be allowed to be performed through private agencies . The space rescarch , the Atomic Power the defence etc. are such functions which can be strictly said to be' Sovereign Functions ' of the state.

In the result , I am constrained to hold that the G.S. 1 is not an' industry' as defined by Section 2 (j ) of the Act and this reference is not maintainable and the reference is answered accordingly.

Given under my hand and seal on this the 18th day ofJuly 2005.

From this clause it can be seen that one of the functions of the GSI is " to conduct systematic studies and research in all sub-discipline of earth science " . This function alone draws GSI into a research institution . But let us examine whether the activities of the GSI can be looked upon as " organized activity " or not ? There can not be any scope for doubt that the activities of the GS1 are " organized activities " between the employer and

B. BORA, PresidingOfficer [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

13050

SCHEDULE

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2005

"Whether the action of the management in terminating the service of Shri Bijendra Bhadra is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman concerned entitled?"

का. आ. 4447.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आयकर विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , गुवाहाटीके पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/261/2003- आई आर ( सी एम -11) ]

2. On receipt of the referred order as well as the Schedule a case being numbered Reference Case No. 1/2004 is registered here and Notices were issued to both partics as per procedure and on receipt of the Notices both the parties appeared before this CGIT- cum-Labour Court.

एन. पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 28th October, 2005

3. The case of the Workman in brief from the Written Statement of the Workman Sri Bijendra Bhadra is that the Management appointed him on 13-3-97 as Canteen boy in the office of the Management.

S.O.4447 .-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Guwahati as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Customs Division and their workman , received by the Central Government on8-10-05.

[No. L -42012/261 / 2003-1R ( CM - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, GUWAHATI , ASSAM

PRÉSENT:

Shri H.A. Hazarika, Presiding Officer, CGIT-Cum- Labour Court, Guwahati .

Ref. Case No. 1/2004

4. That during the course of employment the Workman fell ill in November , 2001 and came to his home town Silchar for proper treatment as he was duly permitted by the Management. While the Workman finally recovered from his ailment in the month of March 02 he wanted tojoin but the Management without any notice and assigning any reason not allowed him to join in his service .No order of termination of his service was passed by the management . Though he was regularly attending the office no work was allowed to him and no official order of terminating him from his service was passed . No salary/ wages as per his appointment order was made . As such the action of the Management is illegal and ultra vires to the Government of India policy and guideline . The Workman also relied upon the W.S. etc. submitted before the Conciliation Officer . An Additional W.S. against the contention of the Management also lodged by the Workman . The Workman prayed to pass a Rule ( Award) that the action of the Management in terminating his service is illegal and to grant appropriate relief etc. In the matter of an Industrial Dispute between:

TheManagement of Customs Division, Aizwal, Mizoram.

5. Case of the Management in short is that Sri Bijendra Bhadra was engaged in the office of the Management at Aizwal as contract labour . The Management denied the contention that he was engaged on 13-3-97 . He was engaged on 29-4-98 on purely temporary as daily wage contract basis and he was liable for termination without assigning any reason. That claim of Bijendra Bhadra is false and the same is intimated to ALC ( C) Silchar vide letter No. 11 ( 32) 1 / ET/AC- AZM/ 02 / 243 dated 26-11-02 by Dy. Commissioner. Custom Division , Aizwal .

Their workman Shri Bijendra , Bhadra. Silchar, Dist - Cachar , Assam. Date ofAward : 07-10-05 .:

AWARD

6. That contract labourers are assigning for particular period and the management cannot wait for indefinite period for return of the contract labourer who was wilfully keeping himself out of engagement . Bijendra Bhadra used to remain absence frequently for which he got lesser pay .

7. There was no departmental canteen in the office premises. But a private canteen is run by a private party. No identity card was issued to the workman as employce but one gate pass was issued to him for the convenience of his entry to office. The workman was posted on daily wage earner at Serchip under Aizwal office of Custom and The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour , vide Order No. L-42012/261/2003 - IR( CM - II) dt . 2-8-20004 , referred this Industrial Dispute arose between the workman Sri Bijendra Bhadra and the management of Custom Division. Aizwal, Mizoram to adjudicate and to pass the order exercising the power conferred by Clause (d) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub-section ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on the basis of the Schedule mentioned below:

13051 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1965 11 LLJ 41 (Mysore).

The same are submitted by a separate written sheet . He stressed,

he was working with intermittent break till 31-10-01 , after 31-10-01 he did not come to work in the Management's office. On 17-3-02 he reappeared in the office and wanted to rejoin his earlier duty but he was not allowed as his engagement was terminated due to his absent.

"One contract Labour employed does not become direct employee of Principal employer .

When employment was for a stipulated period under acontract than the non - renewal of contract of employment on the expiry of stipulated period would not amount to retrenchment . "

8. Heard the argument submitted by learned Advocate Mr. B.K. Bhattacharjee , assisted by Mr. D. J. Barman, Mr. R. Sarma and Miss . Pratima Saha , Advocates for the workman and Mr. S. Bhattacharjce assisted by Mrs. M. Bhattacharjee , for Management in details .

"Termination owing to continued ill health of the workman is not covered in retrenchment . III health contemplated not only physical but mental ill health as well. "

9. The workman examined himself as W. W. I who is cross -examined by the learned Advocates for the Management Mr. S. Bhattacharjee . The Management also examined Mr. Amitava Bhattacharjee as MW. I who is also cross -examined by the learned Advocate Mr. B. K. Bhattacharjce for the Workman. All the evidences recorded by my own hand are carefully perused .

10. Perused the exhibited documents submitted by the workman and the Management . Also perused the case laws submitted by learned Advocate Mr. S. Bhattacharjee for the Management . The Advocate Mr. B. K. Bhattacharjee also submitted some synopsis of case laws which are also perused.

14. But in my opinion in Ext. 21 do not find a stipulated period engagement of the workman , on the other hand that the workman is physically and mentally ill health is also not proved as ought to have been . Hence , with all respect inmy opinion , the cited case laws are not befitting with the instant case . Further the learned Advocate for the Management stressed that the Workman never completed 240 days and as such , not entitled to get bencfit of continuation of his engagement . In support of his contention he submitted a piece of unexhibited document which is not signed by anybody. In my opinion this is not acceptable as authentic piece of documents . However, for convenience I would like to quote that this paper is paginated 322 and I have marked it ' X ' in red ink .

11. One carefully study of evidence and recorded documents , I find the Management engaged the Workman to serve in their departmental functions . It is admitted by theManagement by Ext. 2 that the Workman was appointed as Farash - Safaiwala on purely temporary and daily wage contract basis vice Sri Lieant Thanga until further order. He was engaged at CFF Office Section. Admittedly to enter into office premises on the strength of an identity card issued by an Officer under Assistant Commissioner, Custom Division , Aizwal . The evidence of the M W. I that Ext. A is not identity card but a simple gate pass to get enter into office premises makes no difference as regard his entrance into office premises. In present circumstances ofthe case the gate pass and identity card is similar thing.

15. On perusal of written synopsis of some cases which is to be tagged with the record, I found the learned Advocate for the Workman is stressed much on written notice of termination . He also stressed that the Workman has worked more than a year or 240 days . On perusal of Ext.2 I find the Workman was appointed as Farash -Safaiwala on 29-4-98 . It is found that the Workman worked up to 31-12-01 with intermittent break but the management could not prove authentically that workman did work less than 240 days during this period .

12. In the evidence of MW. 1 it is evident that the Workman was a daily wage earner for 90 days for temporary period. The terms and conditions was that the Workman was appointed as Safaiwala on a condition that he would be removed without assigning any reason. Further it is found in the evidence of MW. 1 that the Workman was not allowed to rejoin as his engagement was terminated due to hisabsence.

16. What I find when engagement or appointment was in writing (Ext. 2) , his termination ought to have been inwritting and as per procedure and giving him reasonable opportunities to terminate . I have already discussed about the case laws cited by the Management and in my opinion also the same is not befitting with the instant case because of the reasons , the facts and circumstances of the case laws and instant case are different . On the other hand . I found though full cases are not submitted the synopsis submitted are in favour of the Workman and befitting with the present case .

13. The learned Advocate for the Management hammer very much that the workman was engaged temporarily and he left the engagement without taking perasssion and reappeared on 31-10-01 after long break and by this time his service is over. The employer not liable to take him back and the learned Advocate in support of his argument relied two case laws:

17. Under the above facts and circumstances . I find the action of the Management is not justified. The Workman is entitled to get back his engagement as Farash - Safaiwala as he was engaged or appointed vide Ext . 2. He is also entitled for back wages . In the result, the Schedule or issue is decided against the Management .

Dena Nath and Other - Vrs - National Fertilizer Corporation AIR 1992 SC 457.

H.A. HAZARIKA , Presiding Officer Pierce Leslie and Company -Vrs -Roma Moily.

13052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

APPEARANCES :

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2005

For the Petitioner : Vissa Venkateswara Rao , Advocate .

For the Respondent : M/s . PAVVS Sarma , Advocate.

AWARD

का. आ. 4448-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 179/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/1/2005- आई आर ( सी- II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 28th October, 2005

Thisis a case taken under Scc . 2 A( 2 ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

S.O. 4448. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 179 / 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was reccived by the Central Government on 13-10-2005.

[No. L - 22013/ 1 /2005 - IR ( C - II ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri T. Ramachandra Reddy, PresidingOfficer

Dated the 5th October, 2005

Industrial Dispute L.C. L. D. No. 179/2004.

BETWEEN:

J.Surayanarayana,

Petitioner

S/o Late J.S. Mohan, R/ o H. No. 12-2-823 , III Floor , Geetha Apartments , Santhoshnagar Colony, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad- 500028.

AND

1. The Chairman & Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan , Near Ayodhya Hotel , Lakadikapool ,

Hyderabad -500 004 .

2. The Director (Operations) , Singareni Collaries Limited, HeadOffice: Kothagudem, Khammam District -507 101.

3. The Chief General Manager , M/s. Singareni Collaries Company Ltd. , Ramagundam- Area, Godavarikhani -505 209 , Kanmnagar District.

Respondents

2. It is alleged by the petitioner that he was appointed in the respondent's company during the month of March , 1984 as clerk grade - Il and subsequently promoted and posted as clerk grade - I at agent office 2 and 2A inclines , Ramagundam , Area - I in July, 1997 and his services were terminated w.e.f. 4-5-1999 vide office order dated 24-7-1999 under two charges. The first charge dated 12-9-1996 was framed under the company's standing orders 25.1 and 25.2 for alleged theft , fraud and dishonesty in connection with the employer alleging that he has done away business with the respondent company in the name ofM/ s . Vijaya Enterprises which is a fictitious company at Vijayawada through his nephew T.V.S.N.S. Mohan . It is submitted that his nephew Mohan has supplied hospital orthopadic instruments in the 1990 through his firm M/s . Vijaya Enterprises and that the petitioner was made responsible for the acts of his nephew. It is further submitted that the petitioner worked in the purchase department for about 9 years and his department maintains vendors register listing the name of the suppliers of technical product and material as company required and that the selection of the said suppliers will be donc by the executives by daily scrutinizing the applications and experience , credibility etc. Whenever any requirement arises for a particular material and the concerned purchase executives verifies the register , select the supplier, invites the sealed quotations , and picks up the lowest quotation. It is further submitted that after receiving the material and satisfying with the quality, payment shall be made to the supplier by the accounts department. The petitioner is only a clerk puts up the note before the executives , has no role to play in accepting the quotations . It is further submitted that his nephew Mohan supplied material and account payce cheque for Rs . 24500/- in favour of M/ s . Vijaya Enterprises was issued and the cheque was encashed at Godavarikhani by opening an account. The petitioner has requested one Ch . Venkatareddy who has got an account in the Andhra Bank for introduction of his nephew Mohan for opening an account. It is further submitted that an enquiry revealed hat there is no company as M/s Vijaya Enterprises at Vijayawada. As such, the petitioner was made guilty of misconduct . The petitioner has not caused any loss to the company or any wrongful gain to him . He further submitted that he never involved in theft , fraud and dishonesty with the respondent's business . An enquiry was initiated भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

against him for the said charge of theft, fraud and dishonest with the respondent . An enquiry officer found him guilty of the charge without any basis or evidence and it is further submitted that the respondent has initiated a second enquiry levelling a second charge against him for unauthorized absence from 30-3-1998 to 7-7-1998 under the company's standing orders 25.31 which reads absence from duty without sanctioned leave or sufficient cause or over standing beyond sanctioned leave " and the enquiry officer has found guilty holding the charge is proved against him. He further submitted that his wife expired on 25-3-1998 and forced to attend the funeral and other related functions during the alleged unauthorized absence and that he made a representation to the respondent which was not considered and he further submitted that he suffered with health problems like POLY ARTHARITIS (Back Pain), High B.P. and Blood Sugar etc. and applied for the extension of leave to the respondent but the respondent directed him to report for duty immediately and that he requested to transfer of his services either to Hyderabad or Kothagudem. It is further submitted that the petitioner alongwith 7 other officers were charged with misconduct but the respondent took lenient view and let off all the officers who were involved in the case with a minor punishment of withholding two increments . The respondent also filed a case before the ACB who investigated into the matter and informed the respondent to take disciplinary action against all the said 7 officers and the petitioner, as there is no prima facie case involving corruption. The respondent sought the relief for reinstatement of his services with back wages by declaring the dismissal of the petitioner from service is illegal and arbitrary.

3. The respondent filed a counter denying the averments made in the petition and pleaded that the petitioner was issued a chargesheet on 12-9-1996 and the petitioner submitted his explanation on 13-9-1996 which was found to be non - satisfactory and hence, an enquiry wasconducted into charges levelled against him by giving full and fair opportunity to defend his case . The management examined 3 witnesses and the petitioner was given an opportunity to examine the witnesses but he did not avail . Again he was given showcause notice. It is further submitted that the petitioner was unauthorisedly absent and a chargesheet was given on 24-7-1998 to that affect and the enquiry officer found him guilty for his unauthorized absence . As the charges levelled against the petitioner was grave and serious and proved during the enquiry and the petitioner was dismissed from services .

4. It was held by this tribunal that validity of both the enquiries conducted against the petitioner is proper and valid by order dated 4-2-2005 .

5. In view of the Section 11 A of ID Act, this Tribunal clothed with the power to reappraise the evidence in the domestic enquiry and satisfy itself whether the evidence relied on by the employer established the misconduct 3276 GI /05-25

13053 alleged against the workman . It is now at liberty to consider not only whether the finding of misconduct recorded by theemployer is correct but also it can defer from that finding in a proper case holding that no misconduct is proved. This Tribunal has also power to set aside the order of dismissal or discharge and direct the respondent to reinstate the workman on such terms as it thinks fit including imposition of lesser punishment in a proved misconduct having to regard to circumstances . The petitioner /workman inthe present case was charged under company's standing orders 25.1 and 25.2 which are extracted below:-

25.1: Theft , fraud or dishonesty in connection with the employer's business or property.

25.2: Taking or giving ofbribe or illegal gratification whatsoever in connection with the employer's business or inhis own interest .

6. The allegation against the petitioner was that he didbusiness with the respondent company in the name of M/s.Vijaya Enterprises, a fictitious company at Vijayawada through his agent Sri Mohan , his own nephew which act amounts to misconduct under the said standing orders . The Enquiry Officer, General Manager, Safety Sri V.L.N. Rao has submitted his report which discloses that during the enquiry he recorded the statements of Poduri Ravi , TVSS Mohan and Ch . Venkata Reddy and the petitioner did not chose to examine them inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and the petitioner did not appear on the date ofexamining Ch. Venkata Reddy on 10-4-1998 and concluded that the petitioner cannot be said to have done business with the respondent company directly since his nephew was owner of the fictitious company M/ s . Vijaya Enterprises Limited but he further concluded that the petitioner acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the company by not sending the enquiries to the genuine companies and held that the charge of fraud and dishonesty against the petitioner is proved . The nephew of the petitioner, Mohan has stated before the Enquiry Officer that he did business with the respondent company for supply of hospital materials and he is the owner of the firms M/s . Vijaya Enterprises situated at Vijayawada and he has supplied material and received account payee cheque from the respondent and in order to draw account payee cheque, he opened an account at Godavarikhani and that for opening an account , the petitioner requested one Venkata Reddy who is having an account , to introduce to the bank and that he merely opened an account showing local address as M/ s. Vijaya Enterprises , SN Nagar Colony, Godavarikhani and withdrawn the amount .

7. The witness Koduru Ravi Shankar has stated that he is the owner of the house in which the firm M/ s . Vijaya Enterprises is located at Vijayawada and in his opinion , it is only a fictitious firms and that no business was held in his house. The house was acquired by his father in 1968 and since then it was let out on rent and that he shifted into house during 1983 into the upstair and the ground floor was also let out by him. But he did not state who are the tenants in the ground floor.

13054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

8. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the Enquiry Officer has not given any reason to conclude that the charge was proved and further contended that the statements recorded by the Enquiry Officer did not disclose that the petitioner acted dishonestly in connection with the respondent's business and further contended that the petitioner's duty was also to put up not regarding the tenders called for as per the directions ofhis superior officers and he has not in choosing the suppliers to the company. On the other hand , the Learned Counsel for the respondent contended that the petitioner acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the company not sending the enquiries to the genuine companies and further the firm M/s . Vijaya Enterprises is a fictitious company floatedby the nephew of the petitioner.

9. It has to be seen whether the material on record is sufficient for proving the misconduct of the petitioner in respect of the charges under section 25.1 and 25.2 of the standing orders of the company. The Enquiry Officer himself held that the delinquent petitioner cannot be said to have done business with the company dircetly since his nephew Mohan was the owner of the fictitious company but observed that the petitioner has acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the company.

10. It is not in dispute that the name of the nephew of the petitioner Mohan was entered into the vendors register as one of the supplier after due enquiry by the executives of the petitioner . The nephew of the petitioner has supplied certain material and the respondent company has paid an amount for the supplies through account payee cheque. The respondent company after verifying the quality and quantity, the payment was made through the accounts department.Admittedly there is no loss to the company in respect of the supplies made by the said Mohan . The duty ofthe petitioner is only to put up note listing the suppliers in the " vendors register" . The selection of the suppliers for listing in the vendors register is the duty of the executives. The executives will list the names of the suppliers in the vendors register, taking into consideration ofthe experience, credibilityetc. of the suppliers and they have to verify the experience of the suppliers firm and its experience and credibility. There is no role to play by the petitioner except putting note regarding the quotations and preparing the comparative statements . His executives will select the suppliers by choosing the lowest tender. In view of the functions of the petitioner, it cannot be said that the petitioner has got any role in picking up the name of his nephew whose firm was entered in the list of suppliers . The petitioner cannot be made responsible merely because his nephew did husiness with the respondent company. It isthe duty of the executives of the petitioner to verify genuiness of the firm before listing in the " vendors register " . The enquiry officer has come to the conclusion that the firm floated by Mohan was fictitious merely because Koduru Ravi Shankar, the owner of the house opinioned that no such firm was located in his house . Further he did not state that who are the tenant in the ground floor. The

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] witness has opinioned that it is a fictitious firm simply because he did not find suppliers of paints and laboratory consumable goods in ground floor of his house.

11. The petitioner after receiving the account payee cheque from the respondent company, has withdrawn the same at Godavarikhani by opening a current account . In order to opening current account, he has to be introduced by a person having account in the same bank and the petitioner has to give local address while opening an account. Merely because the petitioner has requested one Venkata Reddy who is having an account to introduce his nephew for opening an account, it cannot be said that the petitioer did business with the company through his nephew by raising a fictitious firm . The entire evidence collected by the enquiry officer did not disclose that the petitioner is guilty of the charge alleged against him . The conclusions of the enquiry officer are based only on his presumptions and assumptions . In view of the material on record, I hold that the petitioner cannot be said to have done business with the respondent company or acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest ofthe company and further he has no discretion to enter the name of his nephew in the vendors register and that his duty is only to enter the names of the vendors in the register under the instructions of his higher authorities being a clerk . Therefore , I set aside the charges framed under 25.1 and 25.2 of the standing orders of the company.

12. The petitioner was charged for the absence from the duty without sanctioned leave under 25.31 of the standing orders which reads as follows " absence from duty without sanctioned leave or sufficient cause or over -staying beyond sanctioned leave" .

13. In the said charge , it was alleged that the petitioner has remained absent from duty unauthorisedly from 30-3-1998 till the date of issue of chargesheet i.e. on 7-7-1998 and still absconding from duty and the charge- sheet was received by the petitioner on 24-7-1998 and the reply given by the petitioner was found to be unsatisfactory. A regular enquiry was conducted by the Addl . CME/Agent Godavarikhani Nos . 2 and 2A Inclines .

14. It is not in dispute that the petitioner applied 4 days leave on 24-3-1998 and left for Hyderabad as he received phone message that his wife was in serious condition and after reaching Hyderabad, he came to know that his wife expired on the same day evening. The leave for 4 days was sanctioned and he was absent after the expiry of leave i.e. 30-3-1998 and he stated in his explanation that he sent Medical Certificate dated 23-4-1998 and 4-6-1998 and further he pleaded that for sanction of sick leave on loss of payment for futher period of six weeks . The Enquiry Officer after conducting an enquiry found thatthe petitioner has not filed Medical records about his mental illness such as outstation private medical certificate and also analyst reports and not substantiated by producing investigation report and that the private medical certificate was sent with a view to cover up his absence.

13055

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

As per the work, attendance rules with the respondent company if any worker falls sick , he has to report before thecompany hospital , in turn will treat the worker and also issue medical certificate and medical fitness certficate for reporting duty. In the present case , the Petitioner who claims that he fells sick , did not report before the company hospital and further he did not file the medical records such as investigation reports to substantiate his plea that he really fell sick. It has to be noted that when he attended the enquiry at Godavarikhani during his, leave period but he did not chose to report before the hospital authorities regarding his illness . It apppears that after death of his wife , he has to look after his minor child but did not chose to report before the company's hospital for his sickness . TheEnquiry Oficer has rightly held that the petitioner has sent private certificate with a viewto cover up his absence.

15.On considering the material on record , I do not see any sufficient ground to interfere with the conclusions of the Enquiry Officer. Now it is to be seen whether the punishment of dismissal or discharge , is in commensurate with the gravity of the charges . The petitioner was found tobe unauthorisedly absent from 30-3-1998 to 7-7-1998 as stated in the charged. The petitioner was appoint in the March 1984 as Grade- 2 clerk and he was promoted as Grade- I clerk in June , 1997 satisfying his work and he was dismissed from serivec w.e.f. 4-5-1999 . The Petitioner has rendered his services to the utmost satisfaction of his superior officers and his period of unauthorized absent in only after death of his wife and further he is to look a after his daughter aged about 1 lyears . The punishment imposed is apparently disproportionate to the gravity of charge levelled against him . This tribunal has power to alter the punishment by imposing a lesser punishment having due regard to the circumstances of the case.

16.Having regard to the nature and circumstances of the case, I feel that the imposition of stoppage of 3 increments with cumulative affect for a period of 3 years is justaridproper.

17. Therefore, an award is passed directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner without backwages by setting aside the dismissal order of the petitioner and imposing the lesser punishment of stoppage of 3 increments with cumulative affect for a period of 3 years .

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictatedto Shri P.K. Kanaka Raju , LDC transcribed by him, corrected by me and given under my seal of this Court on this the 5th day of October, 2005 .

T. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, Presiding Officer Apendix of evidence

No oral or documentary evidence adduced on either side . नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4449.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 140/2004-175/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-9-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/1/2005-आई आर ( सी-II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th October, 2005

S.O. 4449. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 140/ 2004-175/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal zum Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 08-09-2005 .

[No. L -22015/1/2005-IR (C- II ) | N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri T.Ramachandra Reddy Presiding Officer

Dated the 29th gust, 2005

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. I.D. No. 140/2004 , 141/2004 , 142/2004/143/2004, 144/2004, 145/2004, 146/2004, 147/2004 .

148/2004, 149/2004, 150/2001, 517152/2004 , 153/2004 , 154/2004, 155/2004, 156/20-4, 157/2000円、 158-2004、159/2004, 160/2004, 161/2004, 162/2001,4 , 163/2004 , 164/2004 , 165/2004, 166/2004, 167/2004, 168/2004, 1597004, 170/2004, 171/2004, 172/2004, 173/2004 , 174/2004, 12 of2004.

Between:

Shaik Chand Pasha .

S/o Khader,

Aged about 32 Years , Occ:

Ex-Ancillaryworker Buffer Storage

Complex, FCI , Khammam,

r/o. Khammam Petitioner in LAC 140/2004 AND

I. The Chairman M/s FCI Head Quastors , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

13056

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

3. The Zonal Manager ,

M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai-6.

4. The DistrictManager, M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar , Khammam District.

Respondents in

L.C. 140/2004 Between:

...... Petitioner in LC . 141/2004 D. Janaki Ramulu, S/o. Nerasaiah, R/ o. Khammam District.

AND

I. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20Barakhamba Lane, NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 141/2004 Between:

...... Petitioner in LC . 142/2004 D.Ravi Kumar, S/ oNageshwara Rao , R/o . Khammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/ s. FCI, 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI, District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 142/2004 Between:

... Petitioner in LC . 143/2004 D. Jayamma, W/o Late Chalapathi , R/o Khammam District.

AND

I. The Chairman M/s . FCI HeadQuarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office , 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6 .

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , District Office , Sarathinagar, Khammam, KhammamDistrict .

Respondents in

L.C. 143/2004 Between:

B. Narasaiah , S/ o Gopaiah, R/ o Khammam District .

..Petitioner in LC . 144/2004 AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/ s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 144/2004 Between:

B. Nagamani , W/o Late Gopi,

R/ o Khammam District.

Petitioner in L.C. 145/2004 AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20Barakhamba Lane , New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office , 3rd Floor , HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/ s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chenuai -6 .

13057

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

4. The District Manager,

M/ s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar , Khammam, Khammam District .

Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/sFCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Channai -6.

Respondents in

L.C. 145/2004

Between:

V. Srinivasa Rao , S/o Narayana ,

..Petitioner in L.C. 146/2004 R/o Khammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI, RegionalOffice, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager, M/ s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar , Khammam, Khammam District .

4. The District Manager , M/sFCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District.

Respondents in L. C. 148/2004 Between:

R. Padma , W/o Late Krishna,

R/o Khammam District

Petitoner in L. C. 149/2004

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI, Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

Respondents in

L.C.146/2004

Between:

M. Veerababu , S/o Muthaiah, R/ oKhammam District

3. The Zonal Manager, M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6 .

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam , Khammam District .

Petitoner in

L. C. 147/2004

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi- 110001.

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI, Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai-6.

4. The District Manager, M/s, FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 149/2004 Between:

P. Venkates Warlu , S /o Mallaiah ,

...... Petitioner in L.C. 150/2004 R/o Khammam District .

AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, NewDelhi - 110001.

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI, Regional Office , 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6 .

....Respondents in

L.C. 147/2004

Between:

P. Saravaiah , S/o Venkaiah, R/o Khammam District

Pdetitioner in L. C. 148/2004 AND

1. The Chairman , M/ s FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , New Delhi - 11001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI, Regional Office 3nd Floor, HAKA Bhavan ,

4. The District Manager, M/ s. FCI, District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District.

Respondents in

L.C. 150/2004 Between:

N. Yedukondalu , S/o Venkaiah

......Petitioner in L.C. 151/2004 R/oKhammam District .

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , New Delhi - 110001 .

13058

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6 .

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI , DistrictOffice, Sarathinagar Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 151/2004 Between:

B Veraiah , S/ o Yellaiah, R/ o Khammam District.

... Petitioner in L.C. 152/2004 AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , District Office , Sarathinagar, Khammam , Khammam District..

......Respondents in L.C. 152/2004 Between:

V Govindu , S/o Venkaiah, R/o Khammam District .

..Petitioner in L.C. 153/2004 AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001.

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai-6.

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam , Khammam District.

....Respondents in L.C. 153/2004 Between:

Ch . Srinu , S/o Saidulu, R/ o Khammam District .

Petitioner in L.C. 154/2004

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI, Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6 .

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar , Khammam, Khammam District .

.....Respondents in L.C. 154/2004 Between:

P.Nageshwara Rao, S/o Ramulu , R/ o Khammam District .

... Petitioner in L. C. 156/2004 AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001.

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/ s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6 .

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , District Office , Sarathinagar , Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 156/2004 Between:

..Petitioner in L.C. 157/2004 P. Sirnu , S/ o Sathyam , R/o Khammam District .

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, KhammamDistrict .

...Respondents in L.C. 157/2004 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

13059

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

Between:

A. Madhusudan Reddy, S/ o Papireedy,

R/ o Khammam District.

..Petitioner in L.C. 158/2004 AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi - 110001 ,

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor , HAKA Bhavan, Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/ s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , DistrictOffice, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

Chennai-6.

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam,

Khammam District.

......Respondents in L.C. 160/2004 Between:

K. Srisilam, S/oGopaiah,

..Petitioner in L.C. 161/2004 R/ oKhammam District. AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI HeadQuarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI, Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan, Hyderabad.

...Respondents in

L.C. 158/2004

Between:

A. Mallaiah , S/ o Basavaiah ,

R/ o Khammam District .

..Petitioner in L.C. 159/2004 AND

1. The Chairman M/s. FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager , M/ s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager , M/ s. FCI , District Office , Sarathinagar, Khammam , Khammam District .

....Respondents in L.C. 161/2004 Between:

Ch . Sadaiah, S/o Rajamallu,

R/ o Khammam District.

..Petitioner in L.C. 162/2004 AND

I. The Chairman M/ s. FCI Head Quarters , 16-20Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

Respondents in

L.C. 159/2004

Between:

S. K. HasanMiyan , S/ o Jan Saheb ,

Petitioner in L.C. 160/2004 R/o Khammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s. FCI HeadQuarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road ,

3. The Zonal Manager , M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

..Respondents in L.C. 162/2004 Between:

Ch . Mallaiah, S/o Gokulaiah , R/o Khammam District. .....Petitioner in L.C. 163/2004 AND

I. The Chairman M/s . FCI HeadQuarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, NewDelhi - 110001 .

13060

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

2. The Senior Regional Manager,

FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai-6.

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District.

....Respondents in L.C. 163/2004 Between:

Petitioner in L.C. 164/2004 J. Mallaiah , S/o Lingaiah , R/o Khammam District .

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001.

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI, Regional Office, 3rd Floor , HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/s. FCI , 2, Haddows Road, Chennai -6.

4. The DistrictManager, M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar Khammam, Khammam District.

Respondents in L.C. 164/2004 Between:

Petitioner in L.C. 165/2004 A. Veeraiah , S/o Abbaiah , R/o Khammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI HeadQuarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan, Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 165/2004 Between:

Petitioner in L.C. 166/2004 G. Gabaiah Goleiah, R/o Khammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI HeadQuarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi - 110001.

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan, Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, *Chennai-6 .

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI, District Office , Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

..Respondents in L.C. 166/2004 Between:

K. Sariah , S /o Narasiah,

Petitioner in L.C. 167/2004 R/o Khammam District .

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s. FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI, Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/ s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , District Office , Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

..Respondents in L.C. 167/2004 Between:

J. Sailu , S/o Bikshamaih , R/o Khammam District.

Petitioner in L.C. 168/2004 AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI, RegionalOffice, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

13061

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4. The District Manager ,

M/s. FCI, District Office , Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office , 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

Respondents in

L.C. 168/2004

Between:

Petitioner in L. C. 169/2004 G. Ramaiah S/ o Golaiah , R/o Khammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office , 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager, M/ s . FCI, District Office , Sarathinagar, Khammam, KhammamDistrict .

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6 .

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 171/2004 Between:

Petitioner in L.C. 172/2004 G. Mangaiah S/o Venkaiah , R/o Khammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , New Delhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI, Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

Respondents in

L.C. 169/2004

Between:

D. Veeramma S/ o Ayyanna ,

R/o Khammam District.

Petitioner in L.C. 170/2004 AND

1. The Chairman M/ s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI, Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager , M/s. FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI , District Office, Sarathinagar, Khammam, KhammamDistrict.

......Respondents in L.C. 170/2004 Between:

M. Venkateswarlu S/o Laxminarayana,

...... Petitioner in L. C. 171/2004 R/o Khammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20 Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001 .

3276 GI /05-26

3. The Zonal Manager , M/ s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road , Chennai -6 .

4. The District Manager, M/ s. FCI , District Office , Sarathinagar , Khammam, Khammam District.

Respondents in L.C. 172/2004 Between:

T. Srinu S/o Balakoilaiah,

Petitioner in L.C. 173/2004 R/oKhammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20, Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001 .

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad .

3. The Zonal Manager , M/ s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6 .

4. The District Manager, M/ s . FCI , District Office , Sarathinagar , Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 173/2004 13062

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

Between:

G. Chinna Venkanna S/o Lingaiah,

Petitioner in L.C. 174/2004 R/o KhammamDistrict.

AND

1. The Chairman M/s . FCI Head Quarters , 16-20, Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi - 110001.

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI , Regional Office, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s . FCI , 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai- .

4. The District Manager , M/s. FCI, DistrictOffice, Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District.

Respondents in L.C. 174/2004 Between:

....Petitioner in L.C. 175/2004 V. Babu S/o Thirpataiah , R/ o Khammam District.

AND

1. The Chairman M/ s. FCI Head Quarters , 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, NewDelhi - 110001.

2. The Senior Regional Manager, FCI,RegionalOffice, 3rd Floor, HAKA Bhavan , Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Manager, M/ s . FCI, 2 , Haddows Road, Chennai -6.

4. The District Manager, M/s. FCI, DistrictOffice. Sarathinagar, Khammam, Khammam District .

Respondents in L.C. 175/2004 Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/sAbhinand Kumr Shavili , K. Srinivasa Prasad, Advocates .

Forthe Respondent : M/s B.G. Ravinder Reddy, B. V. Chandra Sekhar , advocates .

COMMON AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2A(2 ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 in view ofthejudgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 2. The petitioner in the cases L.C. 140 to 175/2004 raised an Industral Dispute by way of filing petitions under section 2(A) 2 of ID Act against the management of Food Corporation of India seeking relief to absorb all the petitioners on permanent basis under Direct Payment System in terms of the circular dated 5-11-1997 with consequential benefits including backwages and other attendant benefits . The facts in all the said cases are one and same and the common question of law and fact is involved . As such , it is convenient to dispose of all the said petitions under common Judgement .

3. It is submitted that the respondent FCI has nearly 33 godowns in the State of Andhra Pradesh and one such storage godown is situated at Khammam town consisting of main godown depot and buffer storage complex . The storage capacity of BSC is 60000 Metric tonnes . The respondent has initially engaged on contract basis by entrusting the loading and unloading work to private contractors . The Central Government as a policy, has introduced that all the labourers who are working for FCI loading and unloading activities should form Labour Cooperative Societies in order to save the labourers from exploitationby the Private contractors. In view ofthe policy, the respondent has awarding work directly in favour of labour cooperative societies from 1989 onwards . The wages earnedbythe labourers are distributed among the members of the society equitably. While awarding the contract in favour labour cooperative societies , one of the terms and conditions is there should not be increase or decrease the number of labourers in the cooperative societies which means no fresh labour could be inducted in the cooperative societieswithout prior consent of the respondent .

4. It isfurther submitted that all the labourers working atBSC, and main depot have formed into FC1 Hamalie Labour Cooperative Society and got registered as FCI HamalieLabour Contract Cooperative Society Limited. The society was formed by handling workers/hamalies and ancillary workers. Though they are members of cooperative societies , actually they are working under the directions of the FCI and discharging their duties from time to time. The members of cooperative societies all over the country agitated before the FCI to absorb the members of the society under permanent basis. Consequently there was a settlement between the FCI workers Union and the management of the FCI and decide to absorb hamalies and ancillary workers working in various godowns on permanent basis by introducing Direct Payment System onprotective linked piece rate system on no work no pay basis and a circular was issued on 5-11-1997 . It is further, stated that 4 major depots in the State of Andhra Pradesh i.e. Sanath Nagar, Kazipet , Bukkavolu , Nidadavolu were brought under Direct Payment System and 14 other depots were also brought under Direct Payment System . The BSC , Khammam was one such depot brought under Direct [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

13063

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

Payment System under the circular 5-11-1997. In view of the said circular, the number of hamalies to be inducted by a FCI godown was based upon the formulae which is given below:

Number of Hamalis Annual Turnover ( receipts + issues in big bags ) 365 ×90

and in respect ofancillary workers it was depending on the following formulae:

Number of Ancillary Labourers = @ 4 persons per 5000 Metric Tons covered capacity of the Depot

5. It further submitted that there was 235 hamalies and 61 ancillary workers working with a labour contract cooperative society limited. Though all the workers are eligible to be inducted into Direct Payment System , the respondent FCI absorbed only 171 hamalies and 45 ancillary workers under Direct Payment System. On further agitation by the members of the labour contract cooperative society, the respondent has taken the additional 34 hamalies under Direct Payment Systems , taking into account of reserve of 27% and 10% of Railway Siding . The respondent has not taken into account other factors like weighing the food grain bags and it is physical verification . As per the said circular, only receipts and issues were taken into account while determining the number of hamalies and ancillary workers. After introducing the Direct Payment System in the BSC , Khammam, the petitioners have been thrown out of employment w.e.f. 13-12-1997. Inspite of that , the petitioners along with the other members provided under Direct Payment System are collectively carrying out the work of loading and unloading and sharing the wages received by the employees .

that the ancillary workers were initially engaged as a casual labours even after inducting 48 ancillary labourers under DirectPayment System. The remaining 13 anciallary workers were still being continued as casual labourers and their tenure has been extended from month to month basis by granting appropriate sanction orders . All the anciallary workers who were not brought under Direct Payment System were asked to discharge duties of opening and closing of BSC due to shortage of watch and ward staff and also asked to seal the wagons at the time ofdispatches and to assist the engineering staff. All the hamalies and ancillary workers have been included in the wage register of FCI Hamalie labour contract cooperative societies limited and the respondent has boch paying ESI and EPF contributions. It is further submitted that on the instructions ofSenior Regional Manager, the Assistant Manager has informed the District Manager evaluating the need of ancillaryworkers and reported that there is a requirement of13 ancillaryworkers at BSC and roquested to ratifying the appointment of the petitioners who are discharging their duties as ancillary workers. The District Manager has written to the Senior Manager on 29-6-2002 stating that there is short fall of 13 to 17 ancillary workers at BSC, Khamımarn and roquested to obtain appropriate orders froin higher authorities . The petitioners who are working as ancillary workers were continued upto August 2003 by way of extending their services by granting necessary sanction orders on month to month basis, but however, in themonth ofAugust, 2003, 12 ancillary workers who are petitioners herein were asked not to come to work. It further submitted that out of40 ancillaryworkerswho are brought under Direct Payment System, few of them expired and further submitted that if the respondent correctly calculate the number ofworkers , as per the circular, 12 more ancillary workers would be absorbed permanently under Direct Payment System. It is fubor watted that the hamalie workers who are 24 in number (Petitioners herein) who were not brought under Direct Payment System are entitled for induction into Direct Paymen System if the respondent correctly calculate as per the formulae.

6. It is further submitted that initially, all the foodgrain bags of FCI were 95 kgs . But as, a policy, the weight of the size was reduced to that of 50 kgs uniformly all over the country on the recommendation made by the W.H.O. In view of the reduction of weight, the respondent must calculate the formula regarding the number of hamalies by duly substituting the figure of 95 kgs . with that of 50 kgs . It isfurther submitted that for the purpose of calculating the number of hamalies , the FCI is calculating the each bag contains 95 kgs. but physically extracting the work with 50 kgs.bags. With the result, the number of bags each hamalie isrequired to handle has to become double . Presently each hamalie had to carry nearly 160 bags of 50 kgs . each . But the FCI has not increased the number of hamalies by duly substituting 50 kgs. bag in the formula set out in the said circular. In respect of the ancillary workers , the covered capacity of the godown based upon the total capacity was taken. But in fact , covered capacity of the godown means that the work actually carried out in the godown. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been discharging their duites as hamalies and ancillary workers from the inception ofthe formation of the FCI cooperative society limited and rendered services more than 10 years and that the orders oftermination without inducting into Direct Payment System iscontraryto Section 25( h ) of ID Act . It further submitted

7. The respondent filed their counter by the District Manager, FCI Khammam resisting the claim of the petitioners . It is submitted that the FCI catablished sub- office at Khammam which was attached to the District Office at Warangal . Subsequently the respondent management constructed its own depot for storage of buge quantities offood graias, called as main depot at Khammam. Further the FCI created a separate District Office at Khammam and a new godown called Buffer Storage Complex with the capacity of60000 Metric Tons was constructol to store of food grains . The respondent FCI used to appoint Handling and Transport contractors at the PCI main dapot aswell asBuffer Storage Complex at Khammam for a poriod of 2 years on a open tender basis for handling and foor! grainmoment operations . The contractors used to bring their own labour for the moment of the food grain operations in the main depot as well as in the Buffer Storage [PART II--SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/ AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5 , 1927

13064

Complex. In the year 1989, the respondent has introduced labour cooperative societies in FCI owned godowns to avoid exploitation of labour by the contactors . Accordingly, the labourers of both the godowns formed into a cooperative society and the handling work of food grains was awarded to the society from 1990 onwards on two years basis and it was extended from time to time.

11. TheMW 1 has admitted in the cross examination that the weight of the bag at the time of issue of circular was 95 kgs and the present weight of the bag is 50 kgs . Previously each worker used to carry 90 bags weighing 95 kgs each per day and the same worker now is carrying almost double the number of bags . He further , admitted that there was no contract awarded in the main depot who were handling food grain operations and the labourers enrolled under Direct Payment System are looking after the operations of both the godowns . He also admitted that the Assistant Manager, FCI, Khammam, has sent a requisition for sanction of additional handling and transport workers and ancillary workers on 29-6-2002 to the Regional Manager , Khammam depot and he also further admitted that there is work loan for additional hamalies and ancillary workers .

8. It is further, submitted that the FCI has taken a policy decision to introduce Direct Payment System of labourers , in the place of existing societies , in terms ofthe settlement reached between the FCI management head quarters at NewDelhi and FCI workers Union , Calcutta led by Shri Jena. The FCI main depot and Buffer Storage Complex at Khammam are also identified as one of the depots for the introduction of Direct Payment System out of14 depots identified in A.P. Acircular was issued dated 5-11-1997 indicating the detailed guidelines for inducting the labourers . In view of the guidelines , the respondent enrolled 211 ofhamalie labourers out of235 and 48 ancillary labourers out of 61 labourers . The remaining 24 hamalie labourers and 13 ancillary labourers (who are petitioners herein) were found surplus and not eligible for induction. It is further, submitted that there is no termination of the labourers and the petitioners admitted that they are still working in the FCI which is self contradictory and further contended that the petitioners cannot be absorbed in the Direct Payment System and the Petition filed under 2 (A) 2 of IDAct is not maintainable since there is no termination ofthe petitioners.

12. The District Manager, Khammam Depot has written a letter to the Senior Regional Manager , Hyderabad dated 29-6-2002 in Ex. W36 stating that he has evaluated the requirement of additional labour at the godowns and there are Buffer Storage Complex in the capacity of 60000 Metric Tons and main depot in the capacity of 10840 Metric Tons and the total capacity is 70840 Metric Tons . The Head Quarters while sanctioning ancillary labourers has taken onlyBuffer Storage Complex , Khammam into account and sanction only 48 ancillary labourers at the rate of 4 labourers per 50000 Metric Tons each as per the formula envisaged in the circular leaving the main depot, Khammam whereas the workers were operating in both the godowns and requested for additional sanction of 13 to 17 ancillary labourers to carry out day to day operations . The circular dated 5-11-1997 Ex . M2 shows that only the Buffer Storage Complex, Khammam which is having a capacity of60000 Metric Tons is only notified leaving the main depot . But according the counter, Direct Payment System was introduced in the place of the cooperative society for handling the operations in both the depots .

9. The petitioners filed their respective affidavits in support of their claim application and reiterating the Pleas taken in their applications and got marked the documents as Exs . W1 to W40 . As against this evidence , the respondent examined the Assistant Manager FCI , Khammam Depot as MWI and got marked the documents as EX. MI to M5.

10. It is not disputed that the petitioners are members of the cooperative societies before the introduction of Direct Payment System. The total number of hamalies 235 and the ancillary labour 61 in the cooperative societies. There was a restriction at the time of forming the society that the number of labourers should not decrease or increase without prior consent of the FCI . It is admitted in the counter that the labourers of the said cooperative societies used to undertake loading and unloading operations at both the godowns i.e. main depot as well as Buffer Storage Complex. It is also admitted that the respondent has introduced Direct Payment System in the place of existing societies in terms of settlements reached between the FCI management and the Labour Union. The formula introduced in the said circular dated 5-11-1997 regarding the assessment and requirement of the labour is also not disputed. At the time of issue of the circular, the each big bag is weighing 95 kgs . Subsequently the weight of the bag was reduced to 50 kgs all over the country.

13. The learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently contended that the petitioners are the workers of the FCI for all the practical purposes and they were enjoying all the benefits on par with the employees of the respondent and further contended that the respondent has not taken into account while assessing the number of workers eligible for induction into Direct Payment System , the factors like weighing of food grains bags and physical verification and also the capacity of the main depot at Khammam and further contended that the respondent has admitted that they require more hamalies and ancillary workers for day to day operations and pointed out a letter written to the Senior Regional Manager, FCI by the District Manager disclosing that 3 hamalie labourers out of 211 and one ancillary labourer out of 48 were expired and there are only the total number of workers in both the categories is255 and recommended for induction of the petitioners into Direct Payment System and further contended that whenthe hamalie workers are carrying 2 bags weighing 50 kgseach, it requires more time for transporation as well as handling operations. As such the labourers are burdened 13065

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

and closing of the godowns . In view of the above circumstances , the petitioners are entitled for induction into Direct Payment System under the circular dated 5-11-1997 without backwages on par with the other employees who had been inducted into Direct Payment System.

heavily and requires more number of labourers . On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent contended that since the main depot was not notified under Direct Payment System , the respondent could not induct workers into the scheme even though there is an additional labour requirement and further contended that the petition is not maintainable since the petitioners are not the workers ofthe FCI and there was no termination .

17. Therefore , an award is passed accordingly directing the respondent to absorb all the petitioners under Direct Payment System in terms of the circular dated 5-11-1997 within one month from the date of publication of theaward.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Shri P. Kanaka Raju , LDC transcribed by him, corrected and pronouncedby me on this the 29th August; 2005.

T. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, Presiding Officer. Appendix of Evidence and Documents marked by Petitioner

LCIDNo . 140 of 2004

WW1: Sk Chand Pasha

ExW1: Lr . No. S & C 32 (1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97

ExW2: I.O.Ndt . 1-6-97

Ex.W3: Lr..No . S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97

Ex.W4: ION Lr. of Asst . Manager, Khammam 14. It is a case of the petitioners that they were members of the cooperative societies prior to issue of notification and their rights were recognized by the respondent and they used to distribute the wages equitably among them and they were paid EPF contributions and subjected to medical examination . They were orally asked not to work in the depot as they were not inducted into Direct Payment System. The petitioners are enjoying certain previliges priorto their termination and they were issued identity card and their names removed stating that they are not eligible for Direct Payment System amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of Section 2(O) (0) ofthe ID Act. It is observed in 1976 3 SCR page 160 SBI Vs. Sundara Muni that the word " for any reason whatsoever " in Section 2 ( O) (O ) of the ID Act is very wide and almost admitting no exception. In the present case also , when the workers were denied their right to induct into Direct Payment System, it amounts to termination under Section 25 (F) of the ID Act . Therefore the petition under Section 2(A) (2) is maintainable .

ExW5: Lr. No. Rc . UR (L)/31 (21 )97 dt . 11-5-97

Ex.W6: ION dt. 25-10-97

Ex.W7: Lr.No. S& C 14 (5 )97-98- Conts . Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W8: Office Order No. S & C14 (2 ) 97-98- cont dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W9: Office Order No. S &C 14 (2) 97-cont dt . 4-7-98

ExW10: Lr. No. Estt . BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98

ExW11: Ancillary Labour Workshopdt. 8-11-99

ExW12: Attendance report of petitioner

ExW13: Lr. No. S and C 14 (5 )/97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99

Ex.W14: Lr. No. V and S/ INSPN . GDNS / KMN/ 2001 dt . 24-4-2001

15. Admittedly the FCI has introduced Direct Payment System. The petitioners were members of the cooperative society. The labourers of the petitioner's society were operating handling and transportation operations of both the godowns i.e. main depot as well as Buffer Storage Complex. In such circumstances , the respondent has to take into consideration the capacity of both the godowns while assessing the requirement of ancillary labourers. But in the present case, the FCI has not taken into consideration the capacity of the main godown for the purpose of assessing the requirement of ancillary labourers. If the capacity of main godown is taken into consideration , the petitioners , who are ancillary labourers , are entitled to be inducted into Direct Payment System.

Ex.W15: Lr. No. Accts/DPS/ CPF / EPEF /2002-03

ExW16: Lr. No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002

Ex.W17: Order No. DPS/ 14 (4) 2002 dt. 23-9-2002

Ex.W18: OrderNo. DPS/ 14 ( 4 ) 2002 dt. 27-12-2002

Ex. W19: Lr . No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03

ExW20: Order No. DPS/14 (4) 2002 dt . 6-3-2003

ExW21: OrderNo. DPS/14 (4) 2002 dt. 9-4-2003

Ex.W22: Order No. DPS/14 (4) 2002 dt . 24-4-2003

Ex.W23: OrderNo. DPS/14 (4) 2002 dt. 16-6-2003

Ex.W24: Lr. No. Sand C 32 ( 11 ) /98 -Cont . I -Vol - II dt. 7-7-03

16. The petitioners who were members of the cooperative societies used to work in both the depots even though the main depot was not notified . The work was extracted by the labourers of the previous cooperative societies . In view of the reduction for the weight of the bag, the worker has to transport two bags instead of one bag and admittedly it is a time consuming job in the operation of handling and transportations of the bags . The respondent has not taken into consideration the facts such as weighment of the food grain bags and its verification , closing and sealing of the wagons , opening and cleaning of the wagons for dispatches and opening 13066

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

Ex.W25: Order No. DPS/ 14 (4) 2002 dt. 8-7-03 Ex.W26: Lr. No. FCI/BSC/ DPS / CL / KMM / 03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Ex.W27: Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex.W28 : Receipt of payment for labour charges Ex.W29: No. DP$ 13-1-2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex.W30: Statement of Turn over receipts

Ex.W31: Enrolment certificate

Ex.W32: EPF Scheme Annual Statement

Ex.W33: Receipt for labour charges

Ex.W34: Bio-data of the petitioner

Ex.W35: Lr . No. DPS/13/2002 - Vol.III dt . 30-4-2002 Ex.W36: Lr. No. DPS.32 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002 Ex.W37: Lr. No. S and C 30( 1 )/2001 dt. 10-10-2001 Ex.W38: Statement of turnover of bags for year 1998-99

Ex.W39: Lr . No. 14 (2)/2001 -Labour Celldt. 22-3-2003 of FCI

Ex.W40: Lr. No. 14(2 )/2001 -Labour Celldt .6-8-2002 of FCI

LCID_No . 141 of 2004

WW1: B Janaki Ramulu

Ex.WI: Lr . No. $&C 32(1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex,W2: Lr. No. $ &C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc . UR (L)/31 (21 ) 97 dt. 11-5-97 Ex.W4: ION dt. 25-10-97

Ex.W5: Lr . No. S& C 14( 5) 97-98-Conts . Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W6: Office Order No. S and C 14(2 ) 97-98 -cont dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W7: Office Order No. S and C 14 (2 ) 97 - cont dt. 4-7-98

Ex.W8 : Lr. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W9: Ancillary Labour Workslip dt . 8-11-99 Ex.W10 : Lr . No. S and C 14( 5 )/97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99

Lr. No. Accts/DPS/ CPF/EPEF /2002-03 Ex. W11 :

Ex. W12 : Lr . No. IDPA 32(1 ) /2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W13:

Ex.W14: Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex. W15 : Lr . No. DPS/BSC/ KMM/ ACL/02-03 Order No. DPS/14 (4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Ex.W18: Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003

Ex. W19: Order No. DPS/14 (4) /2002 dt . 16-6-2003

Ex.W20: Lr. No. S and C 32 ( 11 ) /98 - Cont . I - Vol - II dt. 7-7-03

Ex.W21: Order No. DPS/ 14 (4) /2002 dt . 8-7-2003

Ex. W22 : Lr . No. FCI / BSC/ DPS /CL / KMM/03-04 dt25-7-03

Ex.W23 : Lr . No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002dt. 21-8-2003

Ex.W24: Receipt of payment for labour charges

Ex.W25: No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex.W26: Statement of turnover receipts

Ex. W27 : Enrolment certificate

Ex.W28 : EPF Scheme Annual Statement

Ex.W29 : Receipt for labour charges

Ex. W30 : Bio-data of the petitioner

142 of 2004

LCID_No.

WWI : D Ravi Kumar

Ex.W1: Lr. No. S and C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97

Ex.W2: I.O. N dt . 1-6-97

Ex. W3: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with IONdt . 16-8-97

Ex.W4: ION Lr. of Asst . Manager, Khammam

Ex.W5: Lr. No. Rc . UR(L ) /31 (21 )97 dt . 11-5-97

Ex.W6: ION dt. 25-10-97

Ex.W7: Lr. No. S&C 14( 5 ) 97-98-Conts . Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W8: Office Order No. S & C 14(2 ) 97-98 - cont dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W9: OfficeOrder No. S&C 14(2 ) 97 cont . dt . 4-7-98

Ex. WIO: Lt No. Estt./BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98

Ex.W11 : Ancillary Labour Workslip dt. 8-11-99

Ex.W12 : Attendance report of petitioner

Ex. W13 : Lr. No. S&C 14(5) 97-98 office Orderdt. 1-12-99

Ex.W14 : Lr . No. V& S / INSPN.GDNS / KMN /2001 dt. 24-4-2001

Ex.W15 : Lr. No. Accts/DPS/CPF /EPEF /2002-03

Ex. W16 : Lr. No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002

Ex. W17 : Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002dt. 23-9-2002

Ex.W18: Order No. DPS /14(4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002

Ex. WI9 : Lr . No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03

Ex.W20: Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003

Ex.W21: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003

Ex. W22: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 24-4-2003

Ex. W23: Order No. DPS/ 14( 4 )/2002 dt . 16-6-2003

Ex. W24: Lr. No. S & C 32( 11 )/98-Cont . I -Vol - II dt . 7-7-03 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Ex W25: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 8-7-03 ExW26: Lr . No. FCI /BSC/DPS / CL/KMM/ 03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Ex.W27 : Lr . No. DPA/ 13 /( 1 )/2002 dt . 21-8-2003 ExW28: Receipt of payment for labour charges ExW29: No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003 Ex W30: Statement of turnover receipts ExW31 : Enrolment certificate

Ex W32 : EPF Scheme Annual Statement Ex.W33 : Receipt for labour charges

Ex W34: Bio -data of the petitioner

LCID No. 143 of 2004

WW1: DJayamma

ExW1: Lr. No. S&C32( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 ExW2: Lr. No. S&C32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97 ExW3: Lr. No. Rc UR(L)/31 ( 21 )97 dt. 11-5-97 ExW4: Lr. No. S&C 14(5) 97-98 -Conts . OfficeOrderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S&C 14 (2 ) 97-98 -cont dt . 18-6-98

ExW6: Office Order No. S& C 14(2) 97 -cont dt . 4-7-98

ExW7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt. 24-7-98 Ex. W8: Ancillary Labour Workslip dt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S&C 14( 5)/ 97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99

Ex.W10 : Lr . No. Accts/DPS/ CPF /EPEF / 2002-03 ExW11: Lr . No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex. W12: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 ExW13 : Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 ExW14 : Lr . No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/02-03 ExW15 : Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 ExW16: Order No. DPS/14 (4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 ExW17 : Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 24-4-2003 ExW18 : Order No. DPS/14(4 )/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 ExW19 : Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98-Cont. 1-Vol - II dt. 7-7-03 ExW20: Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 8-07-03 Ex.W21 : Lr. No. FCI /BSC /DPS / CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

ExW22: Lr. No. DPA/13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 ExW23: Receipt of payment for labour charges ExW24: No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003 ExW25: Statement of turnover receipts

13067

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

ExW26 : Enrolment certificate

Ex W27 : EPF Scheme Annual Statement

ExW28: Receipt for labour charges

ExW29: Bio-data of the petitioner

LCID. No. 144 of 2004

WW1: B. Narasaiah

ExW1: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 ExW2: Lr. No. S&C32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 ExW3: Lr. No. Rc UR(L) /31 ( 21 ) 97 dt. 11-5-97 ExW4: Lr . No. S& C 14(5 ) 97-98-Cont . Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: OfficeOrder No. S& C 14(2) 97-98 -cont dt . 18-6-98

ExW6: Office Order No. S &C 14(2) 97-contdt . 4-7-98

ExW7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 ExW8 : Ancillary Labour Workshipdt . 8-11-99 ExW9: Lr. No. S&C 14 (5 )/ 97-98 office Order dt . 1-12-99

ExW10 : Lr. No. Accts/DPS/ CPF /EPEF/2002-03 ExW11 : Lr. No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002dt. 29-6-2002 ExW12 : Order No. DPS/ 14(4) /2002 dt . 23-9-2002 ExW13 : Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 ExW14 : Lr. No. DPS/BSC/ KMM/ ACL/02-03 ExW15: Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 ExW16: Order No. DPS/14 (4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W17 : Order No. DPS/ 14( 4) /2002 dt . 24-4-2003 ExW18: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 ExW19 : Lr . No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont. I - Vol - II dt. 7-7-03 ExW20 : Order No. DPS/14 (4)/2002 dt . 8-07-03 ExW21 : Lr . No. FCI /BSC/DPS / CL /KMM/03-04 dt. 25-7-03

ExW22: Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/ 2002 dt. 21-8-2003 ExW23: Receipt of payment for labour charges ExW24 : No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003

ExW25: Statement of turnover receipts

ExW26 : Enrolment certificate

ExW27: EPF Scheme Annual Statement

ExW28: Receipt for labour charges

Ex.W29: Bio-data of the petitioner

LCID No. 145 of 2004

WWI : B.Nagamani [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 13068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

ExW5:

Ex.WI: Lr. No. S&C32( 1 ) 97-98 d . 31-5-97

Office Order No. S& C 14 (2 ) 97-98 -contdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W2: Lr. No. S&C32(1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97

ExW6:

Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc UR (L)/ 31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97

Office Order No. S& C 14 ( 2 ) 97 - contdt. 4-7-98

ExW4:

Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98

Ex.W7:

Lr . No. S&C 14(5) 97-98-Conts office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W5:

ExW9:

Office Order No. S& C 14 (2) 97-98 - cont dt. 18-6-98

Lr . No. S& C 14 ( 5 )/97-98 office Order dt . 1-12-99

ExW6:

Lr. No. Accts /DPS/CPF /EPEF/ 2002-03 Office Order No. S& C 14(2 ) 97 - cont dt. 4-7-98

ExW10:

Lr. No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Lt No Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98

Ex.W11 :

ExW7:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 23-9-2002

Ex.W12:

ExW8: Ancillary Labour Workslip dt . 8-11-99

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002

ExW13 :

ExW9: Lr . No. S&C 14( 5 )/97-98 office Order dt . 1-12-99

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/02-03

ExW14:

Lr. No. Accts/DPS/CPF /EPEF/ 2002-03

ExW10 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003

Ex. W15:

Lr . No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002

ExW11 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003

Ex. W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002

Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003

Ex. W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 ExW13:

Ex.W18 :

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/ KMM/ACL/ 02-03

ExW14:

Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont . I - Vol - II dt . 7-7-03

ExW19 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt. 8-07-03

Ex. W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt .6-3-2003

ExW15:

Ex.W21:

Order No. DPS/14 (4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003

ExW16:

Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003

Ex. W17:

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 21-8-2003

Ex. W22:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003

Ex.W18 :

Receipt of payment for labour charges

Ex.W23 :

Lr. No. S& C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont . I -Vol - IIdt . 7-7-03

Ex. W19 :

No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex. W24 :

Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002dt. 8-07-03

ExW20:

Ex.W25 : Statement of turnover receipts

ExW21 :

Enrolment certificate

Ex.W26:

Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

EPF Scheme Annual Statement

Ex. W27 :

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003

ExW22:

Ex. W28: Receipt for labour charges

Receipt of payment for labour charges

Ex.W23:

Bio- data of the petitioner

Ex.W29 :

No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex. W24:

147 of 2004

LCID No.

Statement of turnover receipts

ExW25:

M. Veerababu

WW1:

Enrolment certificate

ExW26 :

Ex.W1: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 EPF Scheme Annual Statement

ExW27 :

Ex.W2: Lr . No. S& C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with IONdt . 16-8-97 Receipt for labour charges

ExW28:

Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc UR( L) /31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97 Bio - data of the petitioner

ExW29:

ION dt . 25-10-97

Ex.W4:

LCID No. 146 of 2004

Ex.W5:

V. Srinivasa Rao

WW1:

OfficeOrder No. S&C 14(5) 97-98-Cont Office Order dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W1: Lr . No. S& C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97

Ex.W6:

Ex.W2:

Office Order No. S& C 14 ( 2 ) 97-98-cont dt . 18-6-98

Lr. No. S& C 32(1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97

ExW3: Lr. No. Rc UR(L)/31 (21 )97 dt . 11-5-97

Ex.W7: Office Order No. S& C 14(2) 97-98- contdt . 4-7-98

ExW4: Lr. No. S&C 14(5 ) 97-98 - conts office Orderdt. 18-6-98

Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98

Ex.W8:

13069

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Ex.W9: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt. 8-11-99 Ex.W10: Lr. No. S& C 14 (5 ) /97-98 office Order dt . 1-12-99

Lr. No. Accts/ DPS/ CPF/EPEF /2002-03 Ex. W11 :

Lr . No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex. W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Ex.W13:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W14 :

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/ KMM/ACL/02-03 Ex. W15:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W18 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.W19 :

Lr. No. S& C 32 ( 11 )/98 - Cont. I- Vol - II dt. 7-7-03 Ex. W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 8-07-03 Ex. W21:

Ex.W22: Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL/KMM/ 03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 21-8-2003 Ex. W23 :

Receipt of payment for labour charges Ex. W24:

No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex. W25 :

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W26:

Enrolment certificate

Ex.W27 :

EPF Scheme Annual Statement

Ex. W28 :

Receipt for labour charges

Ex. W29:

Bio -data of the petitioner

Ex.W30:

148 of 2004

LCID No.

P. Saravaiah

WW1:

Ex.W1: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 dt 31-5-97 IONdt . 1-6-97

Ex.W2:

Ex.W3: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 ExW4: ION Lr. of Asstt . Manager , Khammam Ex.W5: Lr . No. Rc UR (L) /31 (21 )97 dt . 11-5-97 ION dt 25-10-97

Ex. W6:

Ex.W7: Lr . No. S&C 14(5 ) 97-98- Conts Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W8 : Office Order No. S &C 14 (2 ) 97-98-conts dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W9: Office Order No. S &C 14(2 ) 97-98 -contdt . 4-7-98

Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt. 24-7-98 Ex.W10 :

Ancillary Labour Workslip dt. 8-11-99 Ex. WII:

Ex. W12: Lr . No. S &C 14 (5 ) /97-98 Office Order dt . 1-12-99

3276 G1/05-27

Lr. No. Accts/DPS/CPF /EPEF /2002-03 Ex. W13 :

Lr. No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002dt . 29-6-2002 Ex.W14 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex. W16:

Lr . No. DPS/BSC/ KMM/ACL/02-03 Ex.W17 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex. W18:

Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex. W19:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 Ex. W21:

Lr . No. S &C 32( 11 )/98-Cont . I-Vol - IIdt . 7-7-03 Ex.W22:

Order No. DPS/14( 4 )/2002 dt . 8-07-03 Ex. W23:

Ex. W24 : Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL/KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Lr . No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex.W25 :

Receipt of payment for labour charges Ex.W26:

No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex.W27 :

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W28:

Enrolment certificate

Ex.W29 :

EPF Scheme Annual Statement

Ex. W30 :

Receipt for labour charges

Ex.W31:

Bio-data of the petitioner

Ex. W32:

149 of 2004

LCID No.

WW1: R. Padma

Ex.W1 : Lr . No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. No. S& C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Lr . No. Rc UR(L)/31 (21 )97 dt. 11-5-97 Ex.W3:

Ex.W4: Lr. No. S&C 14( 5 ) 97-98 -Conts Office Order dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S&C 14(2 ) 97-98-contdt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: Office Order No. S &C 14(2 ) 97 - cont.dt. 4-7-98

Lr. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W7:

Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S & C 14 ( 5 )/ 97-98 Office Order dt. 1-12-99

Lr. No. Accts/DPS /CPF /EPEF /2002-03 Ex.W10 :

Lr. No. DPA 32 (1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex. W11 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/14 (4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 ExW13:

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/ 02-03 Ex.W14:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex.W15 :

13070

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 ExW16:

ExW17: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.W18:

ExW19 : Lr . No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98-Cont . I -Vol -II dt. 7-7-03 Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 8-07-03 Ex.W20:

Ex.W21 : Lr. No. FCI/BSC/DPS /CL/KMM/03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex.W22:

Ex.W23 : Receipt of payment for labour charges Ex.W24: No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex.W25: Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W26: Enrolment certificate

Ex.W27: EPF Scheme Annual Statement

Ex.W28: Receipt for labour charges

Ex.W29: Bio -data of the petitioner

LCID No. 150 of 2004

WWI: P. Venkateshwaru

Ex.W1: Lr. No. S& C32(1) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: 1ONdt . 1-6-97

Ex.W3: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 ExW4: ION Lr. of Asst . Manager , Khammam Ex.W5: Lr. No. Rc UR(L)/31 (21 )97 dt . 11-5-97 Ex.W6: ION dt. 25-10-97

Ex.W7: Lr. No. S&C 14(5) 97-98-Conts . Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W8: Office Order No. S&C 14(2 ) 97-98 -contdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W9: Office Order No. S& C 14(2) 97 -cont . dt . 4-7-98

Ex. W10: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt. 24-7-98 Ex.W11: Ancillary Labour Workslip dt. 8-11-99 Ex.W12: Lr . No. S &C 14( 5)/ 97-98 Office Order dt . 1-12-99

Ex. W13 : Lr. No. Accts/DPS/CPF /EPEF / 2002-03 Ex. W14 : Lr. No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002.

Ex.W15 ; Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Ex.W16 : Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt. 27-12-2002 Ex. W17 : Lr . No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/ 02-03 Ex.W18 : Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex. W19 : Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W20 : Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002dt. 24-4-2003 Ex.W21: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] Ex. W22: Lr. No. S& C 32( 11 )/98- Cont. I-Vol - II dt. 7-7-03 Ex.W23: Order No. DPS/14(4 )/2002 dt . 8-07-03 Ex.W24 : Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS/CL/KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Ex. W25 : Lr . No. DPA/ 13( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex. W26: Receipt of payment for labour charges Ex.W27 : No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex.W28: Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W29: Enrolment certificate

Ex.W30: EPF Scheme Annual Statement

Ex.W31 : Receipt for labour charges

Ex.W32: Bio-data of the petitioner

LCID No. 151 of 2004

WWI: N. Edukondalu

ExW1: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 Ex.W2: ION dt. 1-6-97

Ex.W3: Lr . No. S& C32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97 ExW4: ION Lr. ofAsst . Manager, Khammam ExW5: Lr. No. Rc UR(L)/31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97 Ex.W6: ION dt. 25-10-97

Ex.W7: Lr . No. S& C 14( 5) 97-98-Cont Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W8: OfficeOrder No. S& C 14( 2) 97-98-Cont.dt . 18-6-98

ExW9: Office Order No. S& C 14( 2) 97- Cont . dt. 4-7-98

Ex. W10 : Lr . No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W11 : Ancillary Labour Workslip dt. 8-11-99 Ex.W12 : Lr. No. S& C 14( 5 )/97-98 Office Order dt . 1-12-99

Ex.W13 : Lr. No. Accts/DPS/ CPF /EPEF/2002-03 ExW14: Lr. No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002 Ex.W15: Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex. W16: Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex. W17 : Lr . No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/02-03 Ex. W18: Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex.W19: Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W20: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 24-4-2003 Ex.W21 : Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex. W22: Lr . No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont. 1-Vol - II dt. 7-7-03 Ex.W23 : Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 8-07-03 Ex.W24: Lr. No. FCI/BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03 13071

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Lr. No. DPA/13 ( 1 ) /2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex.W25:

Receipt of payment for labour charges Ex.W26:

No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex.W27:

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W28:

Enrolment certificate

Ex.W29:

EPF Scheme Annual Statement

Ex. W30 :

Ex.W31: Receipt for labour charges

Bio-data of the petitioner

Ex. W32:

LCID No. 152 of 2004

B.Veeraiah

WW1:

Ex. W1: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc.UR(L)/31 (21 )97 dt. 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr . No. S&C 14(5) 97-98 -Conts.Office Orderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S & C14 (2 ) 97-98 -cont . dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S& C14(2 ) 97 -cont .dt . 4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt. 24-7-98 Ex. W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt. 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S&C 14 (5 )/ 97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99

Ex. W10 : Lr. No. Accts /DPS / CPF / EPEF /2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex. W11 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W13:

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex. W14:

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/02-03 dt . 5-3-03 Ex.W15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.W19 :

Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/ 98 -Cont. I -Vol - II dt. 7-7-03 Ex.W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt. 8-7-2003 Ex. W21 :

Ex .W22: Lr . No. FCI/BSC /DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex. W23 :

Ex.W24: No. DPS13 / 1 /2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex. W25: Statement of turnover receipts

LCID No. 153 of 2004

WW1: V.Govindu

Ex. WI: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc.UR(L)/31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr..No.. S&C 14(5) 97-98-Conts .Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S& C14( 2) 97-98- cont . dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S& C14 (2 ) 97 -cont . dt. 4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 ExW8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr . No. S&C 14(5 )/ 97-98 Office Order dt. 1-12-99

Ex. W10: Lr . No. Accts /DPS / CPF /EPEF/ 2002-03 dt. 24-6-02

Lr. No.DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex. W11 :

Onder No.DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 27-12-2002 Ex.W13:

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex.W14:

Lr . No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL /02-03 d . 5-3-03 Ex. W15:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002.6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 ExW17:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex. W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 Ex.W19:

Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 -Cont . I - Vol - II dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W20:

Order No.DPS/ 144 /2002 dt. 8-7-2003 Ex.W21:

ExW22: Lr. No. FCI/BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 1. 21-8-2003 Ex. W23 :

No. DPS13 / 1 /2002 1.22-8-2003

Ex. W24:

Statement of turnever receipts

Ex.W25:

LCID No. 154 of 2004

WW1: Ch. Srinu

Ex.W1: Lr . No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98.31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr .No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc . UR(L)/31 (21) 97 dt 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr. No. S& C 14(5 ) 97-98 -Conts .Office Onderdt. 18-6-98

Ex. W5: Office Order No. S& C14 ( 2 )97-98-cont . dt. 18-6-98

ExW6: OfficeOrder No. SatC 14(2) 97-cont . dt.4-7-98 Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 d .24-7-98 Ex.W7:

Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslip di . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr . No. S& C 14 ( 5 ) /97-98 Office Order dt . 1-12-99 13072

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

Ex.W10 : L. No. Accts /DPS/ CPF/EPEF / 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Le No.DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex.W11:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/14 (4 )/2002 dt. 27-12-2002 Ex.W13:

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex.W14:

Lt. No. DPS/BSC/ KMM/ ACL /02-03 dt . 5-3-03 Ex. W15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

Order No. DPS/14(4 )/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex. W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 Ex.W19:

Lr. No. S&C 32( 11)/98 -Cont . 1-Vol - 11 dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex.W21:

Ex.W22: Lr . No. FCI/BSC /DPS /CL / KMM/03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Lr . No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex.W23 :

No. DPS13/ 1 / 2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex.W24:

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W25:

155 of 2004

LCID No.

WW1: Ch Chinna Lingaiah

Ex.W1: Lr . No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr . No. S&C 32(1 ) 97-98 with IONdt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc.UR(L)/31 (21 ) 97 dt. 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr . No. S& C 14( 5 ) 97-98 -Conts . Office Orderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S & C14 (2 ) 97-98 -cont . dt. 18-6-98

Office Order No. S&C14 (2 ) 97 -cont . dt. 4-7-98 Ex. W6:

Ex.W7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S &C 14 ( 5 )/97-98 Office Orderdt . 1-12-99

Ex.W10: Lr. No. Accts /DPS/ CPF/EPEF/ 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr . No.DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex.W11 :

Order No. DPS/14(4 )/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W13:

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex.W14:

Lr . No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/ 02-03 dt . 5-3-03 Ex. W15:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 ExW16:

Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W18 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.W19 :

Lr. No. S& C 32( 11 )/98-Cont . I - Vol - 11 dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex. W21:

Ex.W22: Lr . No. FCI /BSC /DPS / CL / KMM/03-04dt . 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex. W23 :

No. DPS13 / 1 /2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex. W24:

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W25:

156 of 2004

LCID No.

Ex.W1: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97

Ex. W2: Lr . No. S& C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr . No. Rc.UR (L)/31 (21 )97 dt . 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr. No. S&C 14( 5 ) 97-98 -Conts .Office Orderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S & C14 ( 2 ) 97-98-Cont. dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S& C14 ( 2 ) 97 - Cont . dt . 4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No.S & C 14 ( 5 )/97-98 Office Orderdt. 1-12-99

Ex. W10 : Lr. No. Accts /DPS / CPF / EPEF / 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr . No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002dt . 29-6-2002 Ex.W11 :

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS /14(4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W13 :

Emaildt . 22-2-03

Ex,W14:

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/ 02-03 dt. 5-3-03 Ex.W15 :

Order No. DPS/14 ( 4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS / 14(4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 Ex. W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex. W18:

Order No. DPS / 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex. W19 :

Lr. No. S& C 32 ( 11 ) /98 -Cont . I - Vol - IIdt . 7-7-03 Ex. W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex. W21 :

Ex. W22: Lr. No. FCI /BSC /DPS /CL / KMM/03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex.W23 :

No. DPS13 /1 /2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex. W24:

statement of turnover receipts

Ex,W25 :

157 of 2004

LCID No.

PSrinu

WW1 :

Ex.WI: Lr. No. S&C 32(1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. No. S&C32 (1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc . UR(L) /31 ( 21 )97 dt. 11-5-97 13073

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Ex.W4: Lr. No. S&C 14( 5 ) 97-98 - Conts .Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex. W5: Office Order No. S& C14 ( 2 )97-98- Cont . dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S& C14 ( 2)97 -cont. dt . 4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lt. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt. 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No.S &C 14 (5 )/97-98 Office Orderdt . 1-12-99

Ex. W10 : Lr . No. Accts /DPS/ CPF / EPEF / 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002 Ex.W11 :

Ex.W12: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W13:

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex.W14:

Lr . No. DPS/BSC/ KMM/ACL/02-03dt . 5-3-03 Ex. W15:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4) /2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex. W18 :

Order No. DPS / 14(4 )/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex. W19:

Lr. No. S& C 32 ( 11 )/98 - Cont. I -Vol -II dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W20 :

Order No. DPS/14 (4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex.W21 :

Ex. W22: Lr . No. FC1 /BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002dt. 21-8-2003 Ex. W23:

No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003 Ex.W24:

Statement of turnover receipts Ex. W25:

LCID No. 158 of 2004

WW1: A. Madhusudhan Reddy

Ex.WI: Lr. No. S&C32 ( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97 Ex.W2:

Lr. No. Rc .UR( L) /31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97 Ex. W3:

ExW4: Lr. No. S& C 14 (5 ) 97-98- Conts .Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S& C14 (2 ) 97-98 -cont . dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S& C14 (2 ) 97-Cont.dt .4-7-98

Ex.W7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S& C 14 ( 5 )/97-98 Office Orderdt. 1-12-99

Ex.W10: Lr. No. Accts /DPS/CPF /EPEF /2002-03 dt. 24-6-02

Ex.WII : Lr. No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002dt . 29-6-2002 Ex.W12: Order No. DPS/14( 4 )/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W13: Order No. DPS /14 (4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W14: Emaildt . 22-2-03

Ex.W15 : Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03dt. 5-3-03 Ex.W16: Order No. DPS/14 (4 )/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex.W17: Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W18: Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W19: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Lr . No. S& C 32 ( 11 )/98-Cont. I -Vol - II dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W20 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex. W21 :

Ex.W22 : Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS / CL /KMM/ 03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Lr . No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 21-8-2003 Ex.W23:

No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex.W24:

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex .W25:

LCID No. 159 of 2004

WW1: A. Mallaiah

Ex.W1: Lr. No. S&C32( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr . No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with IONdt . 16-8-97 Ex. W3: Lr. No. Rc.UR(L)/31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97 ExW4: Lr..No..S& C 14 (5 ) 97-98 -Conts.Office Order dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W5 : Office Order No. S & C14 (2 ) 97-98- cont . dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S& C14 (2 ) 97 - Cont . dt .4-7-98 Lt. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt. 24-7-98 Ex.W7:

Ex. W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S& C 14 ( 5 ) /97-98 Office Order dt . 1-12-99

Ex.W10 : Lr . No. Accts /DPS/ CPF /EPEF /2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex .W11 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4 )/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W13:

Ex.W14 : Email dt. 22-2-03

Lr. No. DPS /BSC/ KMM/ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03 Ex.W15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 24-4-2003 Ex.W18 :

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4 )/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 Ex.W19:

Lr. No. S& C 32( 11 )/98- Cont . I-Vol - 11 dt . 7-7-03 Ex. W20:

13074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

Ex.W2I : Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex.W22: Lr . No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/ 03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Ex.W23 : Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 21-8-2003 Ex. W24: No. DPS13 / 1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex. W25: Statement of turnover receipts

LCID No. 160 of 2004

WWI: S. K. Hasan Miyan

Ex.W1 : Lr . No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. Np. S&C 32( 1) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr . No. Rc.UR(L)/31 (21 )97 dt . 11-5-97 ExW4: Lr . No. S&C 14( 5 ) 97-98-Conts . Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S& C14 (2 ) 97-98-cont .dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S&C14(2 ) 97 -cont . dt . 4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr . No. S&C 14(5)/97-98 office Order dt . 1-12-99 Ex.W10 : Lr. No. Accts/DPS/ CPF /EPEF / 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Ex.W11: Lr. No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002 Ex. W12: Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4 )/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex. W13: Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex. W14 : Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex. W15 : Lr . No. DPS /BSC / KMM/ACL/02-03 dt . 5-3-03 Ex.W16: Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex. W17: Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 ExW18: Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W19 : Order No. DPS/ 14( 4) /2002 dt. 16-6-2003 Ex.W20 : Lr. No. S&C 32( 11 )/98 - Cont. I -Vol - II dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W21 : Order No. DPS/ 14( 4 )/2002 dt. 8-7-2003 Ex .W22: Lr . No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Ex.W23 : Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex .W24: No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex.W25: Statement of turnover receipts

LCID No. 161 of 2004

WW1: K. Sriselam

Ex.WI: Lr. No S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97

ExW2: Lr . No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr . No Rc.UR( L )/31 (21 )97 dt. 11-5-97

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] ExW4: Lr . No. S&C 14 (5 ) 97-98 -Conts. OfficeOrderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S & C14 ( 2 ) 97-98-cont. dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W6: Office Order No. S& C14 ( 2 )97 -cont . dt . 4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9 : Lr. No.S & C 14 ( 5 ) /97-98 Office Order dt . 1-12-99

Ex. W10 : Lr . No. Accts/DPS /CPF /EPEF/ 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Ex. W11 : Lr. No.DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002 Ex.W12 : Order No. DPS/ 14 (4) /2002 dt . 23-9-2002 ExW13 : Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex . W14 : Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex.W15: Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03 dt . 5-3-03 Ex.W16: Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex. W17 : Order No. DPS/ 14 (4) /2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W18 : Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4 )/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W19 : Order No. DPS/ 14( 4 )/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 Ex. W20 : Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont . I -Vol - II dt . 7-7-03 Ex .W21 : Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex.W22 : Lr. No. FCI /BSC /DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Ex.W23 : Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 21-8-2003 Ex.W24: No. DPS13/ 1 / 2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex. W25: Statement of turnover receipts

LCID No. 162 of 2004

WW1: Ch . Sadaiah

Ex.WI : Lr. No. S& C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97

Ex.W2: Lr . No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3 : Lr . No. Rc .UR(L)/31 ( 21 )97 dt. 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr. No. S& C 14 ( 5 ) 97-98 -Conts.Office Order dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S& C14 (2 ) 97-98-cont . dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: Office Order No. S& C14 (2 )97-cont . dt . 4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lr. No. Estt/BSC/ Khammam/ 98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S& C 14(5 )/97-98 office Order dt . 1-12-99 Ex. Wi0 : Lr . No. Accts/DPS/ CPF/EPEF / 2002-03 dt. 24-6-02

Ex. WII : Lr. No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 13075

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex. W13:

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex. W14 :

Lr . No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03 Ex.W15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 Ex.W17 :

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.W19 :

Lr. No. S& C 32 ( 11 )/98-Cont . I -Vol - 11 dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W20:

Ex.W21: OrderNo. DPS/ 14( 4)/ 2002 dt. 8-7-2003 Ex. W22 : Lr . No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04dt . 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( I )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex. W23 :

Ex. W24: No. DPS13/1 /2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex. W25:

163 of 2004

LCID No.

ChMallaiah

WW1 :

Ex.W1: Lr. No. S&C 32(1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr . No. S&C 32(1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc . UR(L )/31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr. No. S&C 14 (5) 97-98-Conts . Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S& C14 ( 2 )97-98- cont . dt. 18-6-98

OfficeOrder No. S&C14 (2)97 -cont .dt . 4-7-98 Ex.W6:

Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W7:

Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr . No.S&C 14( 5 )/97-98 office Order dt . 1-12-99 Ex. W10 : Lr. No. Accts /DPS/CPF/EPEF/2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex. W11:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 27-12-2002 Ex.W13 :

Email dt . 22-2-03

Ex.W14 :

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/ KMM/ ACL/02-03dt. 5-3-03 Ex.W15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex. W16 :

Order No. DPS /14 (4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex. W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.WI9:

Ex.W20: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont . I-Vol - 11 dt . 7-7-03 Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex.W21:

Ex. W22: Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 21-8-2003 Ex.W23 :

No. DPS13/ 1 /2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex. W24:

Statement of tunover receipts

Ex. W25:

LCID No. 164 of 2004

WWI: J.Mallaiah

ExW1: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION.dt. 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc. UR(L)/31 (21 ) 97 dt . II -5-97 ExW4: Lr. No. S&C 14(5) 97-98 -Conts .Office Orderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S&C14 (2 ) 97-98-cont . dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S&C14 (2 ) 97-cont .dt . 4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lt No .. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S&C 14(5 )/97-98 Office Order dt . 1-12- 99

Ex.W10 : Lr. No. Accts /DPS / CPF / EPEF/ 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No. DPA 32( I )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002 Ex.Wil :

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4) /2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4 )/2002 dt. 27-12-2002 Ex.W13 :

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex.W14 :

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/ 02-03 dt . 5-3-03 Ex. W15:

Order No. DPS /14 (4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex. W16:

Ex. W17: Order No. DPS/14(4 )/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 24-4-2003 Ex. W18:

Order No : DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.W19:

Lr . No. S& C 32 ( 11 )/98 - Cont. I -Vol - 11 dt . 7-7-03 Ex. W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex.W21:

Ex.W22 : Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL/KMM/03-04dt. 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 (1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex.W23 :

No. DPS13/ 1 /2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex.W24:

Statement of tunover receipts

Ex. W25:

LCID No. 165 of 2004

WW1: AVeraiah

Ex. W1: Lr. No. S&C 32 (1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr . No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97 13076

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc . UR(L)/31 (21 )97 dt. 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr. No. $&C 14 (5 ) 97-98 -Conts. Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S& C14( 2) 97-98- cont . dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrderNo. S&C14( 2) 97 -contdt .4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lr. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No.S&C 14(5)/97-98 office Order dt . 1-12-99 Ex.W10 : Lr. No Accts/DPS / CPF / EPEF/2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No. DPA 32 (1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex.W11:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W13:

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex. W14 :

Lr . No. DPS/BSC/ KMM/ ACL/02-03 dt . 5-3-03 Ex. W15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex. W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex. W19 :

Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98 - Cont . I - Vol - 11 dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W20 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex.W21:

Ex.W22 : Lr . No. FCI/BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Lr . No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex. W23 :

No. DPS13/ 1 /2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex.W24:

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W25:

LCID No. 166 of 2004

WW1: G. Gabaiah

Ex.W1 : Lr. No. S& C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc.UR(L )/31 ( 21 )97 dt . 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr . No. S&C 14(5 ) 97-98 -Conts .Office Orderdt. 18-6-98 .

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S&C14 (2 )97-98- cont. dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S&C14 (2 ) 97 - contdt . 4-7-98 Lr No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W7:

Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S&C 14( 5)/97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99 Ex. W10 : Lr. No. Accts/DPS /CPF /EPEF/2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 Ex.W11:

Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002

Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002

Ex.WI3:

Email dt . 22-2-03

Ex.W14:

Lr . No. DPS /BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03

Ex. W15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003

Ex. W16 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003

Ex. W17 :

Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003

Ex. W18 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003

Ex. W19:

Lr . No. S&C 32 ( 11 ) /98-Cont . I- Vol- 11 dt. 7-7-03

Ex.W20 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003

Ex.W21:

Ex.W22: Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 21-8-2003

Ex. W23 :

No. DPS13/ 1 /2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex. W24 :

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex .W25:

167 of 2004

LCID No.

K. Saraiah

WW1 :

Ex.W1 : Lr . No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97

Ex.W2: Lr . No. S& C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with IONdt . 16-8-97

Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc . UR(L )/31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97

Ex.W4: Lr. No. S&C 14 (5 ) 97-98- Conts .Office Orderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S&C14 (2 ) 97-98- cont. dt . 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S& C14 (2 ) 97 - cont . dt. 4-7-98

Ex.W7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt. 24-7-98

Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt. 8-11-99

Ex.W9: Lr. No. S&C 14 (5 )/97-98 Office Order dt . 1-12-99

Ex .W10: Lr . No. Accts /DPS/ CPF/ EPEF / 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002

Ex. W11 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002

Ex. WI2:

Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4 )/2002 dt. 27-12-2002

Ex. W13 :

Emaildt. 22-2-03

Ex.W14 :

Ex.W15 : Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03 Order No. DPS/14 ( 4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003

Ex. W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4) /2002 dt . 9-4-2003

Ex. W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14 ( 4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003

Ex. W18:

Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt. 16-6-2003

Ex. W19 :

Lr. No. S& C 32( 11 )/98-Cont. I - Vol - 11 dt. 7-7-403

Ex. W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003

Ex.W21:

13077

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Ex. W22: Lr . No. FCI /BSC/DPS/CL/KMM/03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex. W23:

No. DPS13 / 1 / 2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex.W24:

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex. W25:

LCID No. 168 of 2004

J. Sailu

WW1:

Ex.WI: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr . No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc . UR(L)/31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr. No. S& C 14 ( 5 ) 97-98-Conts .Office Orderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S& C14 (2 ) 97-98- cont dt 18-6-98

Ex. W6: OfficeOrder No. S& C 14 (2 ) 97-cont dt . 4-7-98 Lr. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt. 24-7-98 Ex.W7:

Ex. W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt. 8-11-99 Ex. W9: Lr . No. S& C 14 ( 5 )/ 97-98 Office Order dt. 1-12-99

Ex.W10 : Lr. No. Accts /DPS/ CPF /EPEF/ 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No.DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002 Ex. WII :

Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex. W12:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex. W13:

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex.W14:

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03dt . 5-3-03 Ex.W15:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 Ex. W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex. W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W18 :

Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 Ex. W19 :

Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98-Cont . I -Vol - 11 dt. 7-7-03 Ex.W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 8-7-2003 Ex.W21 :

Ex. W22: Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL/KMM/03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Lr . No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex. W23:

No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt . 22-8-2003

Ex.W24:

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W25:

169 of 2004

LCID No.

G. Ramaiah

WW1 :

Ex. W1: Lr. No. S&C 32 (1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr . No. Rc . UR(L)/31 (21 )97 dt . 11-5-97 3276 G1 /05-28

Ex.W4: Lr . No. S&C 14(5) 97-98-Conts .Office Orderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5 : Office Order No. S & C14 (2 )97-98 -cont dt 18-6-98

Ex.W6: Office Order No. S&C14 (2 )97-cont dt . 4-7-98 ExW7: Lt. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Ex.W9: Lr. No. S&C 14(5 )/97-98 office Order dt . 1-12-99 Ex.W10 : Lr . No. Accts /DPS /CPF/ EPEF / 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No.DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002 Ex. W11 :

Order No. DPS /14 (4 )/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex. W12:

Order No. DPS/14 (4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W13 :

Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex. W14:

Lr. No. DPS /BSC/ KMM/ ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03 Ex.W15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex. W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 9-4-2003 Ex.W17 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.W19 :

Lr. No. S& C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont . 1 -Vol -11 dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W20:

Order No. DPS/ 14 (4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex. W21 :

Ex.W22: Lr . No. FCI /BSC /DPS /CL /KMM/03-04dt . 25-7-03

Lr . No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 ExW23 :

No. DPS13 / 1/ 2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex.W24:

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex. W25:

170 of 2004

LCID No.

D.Veeranna

WWI:

Ex.W1: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr . No. S&C32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 ExW3: Lr. No. Rc . UR( L)/31 (21)97 dt. 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr. No. S&C 14(5 ) 97-98-Conts .Office Orderdt. 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S & C14 (2 ) 97-98 -cont dt . 18-6-98

Ex. W6: Office Order No. S&C14 ( 2) 97 -contdt . 4-7-98 Ex.W7: Lt No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt. 8-11-99 Lr . No.S&C 14(5)/97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99 Ex.W9:

Ex. WIO: Lr. No. Accts/DPS / CPF / EPEF / 2002-03 dt. 24-6-02 13078

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

Lr. No. DPA 32(1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002

ExW24

W24 : No. DPS 13/1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003 ExW11:

ExW12: Order No. DPS/ 14 (4 )/2002 dt . 23-9-2002

ExW25: Statement of turnover receipts

LCID No. 172 of2004

ExW13: Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 27-12-2002

ww1:

Ex.W14: Email dt. 22-2-03

G.Mangaiah

Ex.W15 : Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03 ExWI: Lr. No. S&C 32(1) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 ExW16: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003

ExW2: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97 Ex.WI7: Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003

ExW3: Lr. No. Rc. UR(L)31 (21 )97 dt. 11-5-97 ExW18: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 24-4-2003

Ex.W4: Lr. No. S&C 14(5) 97-98-Conts.Office Orderdt. 18-6-98

ExW19: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 16-6-2003

ExW20: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98- Cont. I -Vol - 11 dt . 7-7-03 Ex.W5: Office Order No. S&C14 (2) 97-98-cont dt 18-6-98

ExW21: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt .8-7-2003

ExW6 : Office Order No. S&C14 (2)97-cont dt . 4-7-98

ExW7: Lt. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 ExW22 : Lr . No. FCI/BSC/DPS /CL/KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

ExW8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 ExW23: Lr. No. DPA/ 13 (1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003

ExW24 : No DPS13/ 1 /2002 dt . 22-8-2003

ExW9: Lr. No. S&C 14(5)/97-98 Office Order dt. 1-12-99

ExW25: Statement of turnover receipts

LCID No. 171 of 2004

ExW10 : Lr. No. Accts/DPS/CPF /EPEF/2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

WWI: M. Venkateshwarlu

Lr. No. DPA 32(1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002

ExW11 :

Ex.WI: Lr . No. S&C 32( 1) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97

ExW12: Order No. DPS/14(4 )/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Ex. W2: Lr . No. S&C32 (1 ) 97-98 with ION dt. 16-8-97

ExW13 : Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 ExW3: Lr. No. Rc.UR(L)/31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97

ExW14: Email dt . 22-2-03

ExW15 : Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03 dt . 5-3-03 Ex.W4: Lr..No..S&C 14(5 ) 97-98- Conts.Office Order dt. 18-6-98

Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt 6-3-2003

ExWI6:

ExW17: Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W5: Office Order No. S&C14( 2) 97-98-contdt 18-6-98

ExW18: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 ExW6: OfficeOrder No. S&C14(2)97 -cont dt. 4-7-98

ExW19: Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 ExW7: Lt. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98

ExW20: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98-Cont. I-Vol - 11 dt. 7-7-03 ExW8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99

ExW21: Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 ExW9: Lr. No. S&C 14(5 )/97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99

ExW22: Lr. No. FCI/BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

ExW10 : Lr . No. Accts/DPS / CPF /EPEF/ 2002-03 dt. 24-6-02

ExW23: Lr. No. DPA/ 13 (1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003

ExW24 : No. DPS13/ 1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003 ExWII : Lr. No.DPA 32 (1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002

Statement of turnover receipts ExW12: Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt. 23-9-2002

ExW25:

LCID No. 173 of 2004

Order No. DPS/14(4 )/2002 dt. 27-12-2002

ExW13 :

ExW14: Email dt . 22-2-03

WW1: T. Srinu

ExW15 : Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03

ExWl: Lr. No. S&C32( 1) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003

Ex.W16:

ExW2: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Order No. DPS/ 14( 4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003

ExW17:

ExW3: Lr. No. Rc.UR(L)/31 (21 )97 dt . 11-5-97 Order No. DPS/14(4)/2002 dt . 24-4-2003

Ex.W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003

ExW19:

ExW4: Lr. No. S&C 14(5) 97-98-Conts .Office Order dt. 18-6-98

ExW20: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont . I -Vol - 11 dt. 7-7-03

Order No. DPS/14(4 )/2002 dt . 8-7-2003

ExW21:

ExW5: Office Order No. S&C14 ( 2) 97-98-cont dt 18-6-98

Ex.W22 : Lr. No. FCI /BSC /DPS /CL /KMM/03-04dt. 25-7-03

ExW6: OfficeOrder No. S&C14 (2)97 -cont dt . 4-7-98 Ex.W23: Lr. No. DPA/ 13 (1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003

Ex.W7: Lt. No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt. 24-7-98 13079

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt . 8-11-99 Lr. No. S&C 14(5 )/97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99 ExW9:

Ex.W10 : Lr. No. Accts/DPS /CPF / EPEF /2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Ex. W11 : Lr. No. DPA 32( 1 )/2002 dt. 29-6-2002 Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

ExW13 : Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 27-12-2002 Email dt. 22-2-03

Ex. W14 :

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03 ExW15 :

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex.W16 :

Ex.W17: Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt . 24-4-2003 Ex.W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.W19:

Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont. I-Vol - 11 dt . 7-7-03 ExW20 :

Order No. DPS/14(4 )/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex.W21:

Ex.W22: Lr . No. FCI /BSC/DPS /CL /KMM/03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Ex.W23: Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 No. DPS13 / 1/2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex.W24:

Statement of turnover receipts

Ex.W25:

LCID No. 174 of 2004

WW1: G. Chinna Venkanna

Ex.W1: Lr. No. S&C 32 (1 ) 97-98 dt . 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc.UR(L)/31 (21 ) 97 dt . 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr. No. S&C 14(5) 97-98-Conts .Office Orderdt . 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order No. S& C14 (2 ) 97-98-cont dt 18-6-98

Ex.W6: OfficeOrder No. S& C14 (2 )97-cont dt . 4-7-98 Lr . No. Estt/BSC/Khammam/98 dt . 24-7-98 ExW7:

Ex.W8: Ancillary Labour Workslipdt. 8-11-99 ExW9: Lr . No: S&C 14( 5 )/97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99 Ex. W10 : Lr. No. Accts /DPS/CPF / EPEF /2002-03 dt. 24-6-02

Lr . No. DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dt . 29-6-2002 ExW11 :

Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Ex.W13: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 Ex.W14: Email dt. 22-2-03

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03 Ex.W15 :

Ex.W16: Order No. DPS/14 (4)/2002 dt . 6-3-2003 ExW17: Order No. DPS/ 14(4)/2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Order No. DPS/ 14(4) /2002 dt. 24-4-2003 ExW18:

Ex.W19: Order No. DPS/ 14(4 )/2002 dt. 16-6-2003 Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 11 )/98 -Cont . I-Vol - 11 dt .7-7-03 Ex.W20:

Ex.W21: Order No. DPS/14 (4)/2002 dt . 8-7-2003 Ex W22: Lr: No. FCI /BSC/DPS/ CL /KMM/03-04 dt . 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 Ex.W23:

No. DPS13/ 1 /2002 dt. 22-8-2003

Ex.W24 :

Statement of turnover receipts

ExW25:

175 of 2004

LCID No.

WWI: V.Babu

Ex.WI: Lr. No. S&C 32 ( 1 ) 97-98 dt. 31-5-97 Ex.W2: Lr. No. S&C 32( 1 ) 97-98 with ION dt . 16-8-97 Ex.W3: Lr. No. Rc.UR(L)/31 (21 )97 dt. 11-5-97 Ex.W4: Lr. No. S&C 14( 5) 97-98-Conts .Office Orderdt . 18-6-98

Ex.W5: Office Order N№ S & C14 ( 2 ) 97-98-cont dt 18-6-98

ExW6: Office Order No. S& C14( 2) 97 -contdt. 4-7-98 Lr. No. Estt/B3C/Khammam98 dt . 24-7-98 ExW7:

ExW8: Ancillary Latour Workslipdt. 8-11-99 Ex W9: Lr . No. S&C 14 ( 3 )/ 97-98 office Order dt. 1-12-99

Ex. WIO: Lr. No. Accts /DPS/ CPF / EPEF / 2002-03 dt . 24-6-02

Lr. No.DPA 32 ( 1 )/2002 dr. 29-6-2002 ExW11 :

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4 )/2002 dt . 23-9-2002 Ex.W12:

Order No. DPS/14 ( 4)/2002 dt . 27-12-2002 ExWI3:

Email dt. 22-2-03

ExW14 :

Lr. No. DPS/BSC/KMM/ ACL/02-03 dt. 5-3-03 Ex. W15:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4 )/2002 dt. 6-3-2003 Ex.W16:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4) /2002 dt. 9-4-2003 Ex.W17:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4 )/2002 dt. 24-4-2003 Ex.W18:

Order No. DPS/ 14( 4 )/2002 dt . 16-6-2003 Ex.W19 :

13080

[PART I- SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

ExW20: Lr. No. S&C 32( 11 )/98-Cont . I-Vol - 11 dt. 7-7-03 ExW21: Order No. DPS/14( 4)/2002 dt. 8-7-2003 Ex. W22 : Lr. No. FCI /BSC/DPS/ CL /KMM/03-04 dt. 25-7-03

Lr. No. DPA/ 13 ( 1 )/2002 dt. 21-8-2003 ExW23:

ExW24: No. DPS13 / 1 /2002 dt. 22-8-2003

ExW25: Statement of turnover receipts

Appendix of Evidence and Documents marked by Management ( in all the 36 cases)

MW1: Shri N.S. Avadhani

Ex.Ml: Booklet showing the names of hamali labourers &ancillary labourers engaged by Labour Co- operative Society as in the year 1989 .

Ex M2: Copy ofcircular dated 5-11-1997

Ex.M3: Copy of officeOrder No. S&C 14( 5 )/97-98/ Conts . dated 18-6-98 (names of 177 handling labourers).

Ex.M4: Copy of officeOrder No. S& C 14( 5 )/97-98/ Conts . dated2-12-99 ( names of 34 handling labourers).

ExM5: Copy of office Order No. S&C 14 (2)/97-99/ Conts. dated 18-6-98. ( names of 48 Ancillary/ Casual labourers).

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4450.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्स्टीट्यूट आफ होटल मेनेजमेंट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 28/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-09-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013 /1/2005- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th October, 2005

S.O. 4450. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 28/ 2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , în the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Institute of Hotel Management, Catering Technology & applied Nutrition and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on8-09-2005.

[No. L- 22013/ 1 /2005- IR ( C- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Oficer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present:

Shri T. Ramachandra Reddy , Presiding Officer Dated the 30th August, 2005 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. I.D. No. 28/2005 Between:

T.A. Vinod Kumar,

S/ o T. Anjaiah R/ oH.No. 1-31/14, Inhdiranagar Colony, Tirumalgherry,

...... Petitioner Secunderabad.

AND

1. The Principal , M/s. Institute of Hotel Management , Catering Technology and Applied Nutrition , Government of India Enterprise, ATI Campus , Vidyanagar , Hyderabad -7.

2. Mr. Vali , Contractor, C/ o Principal , M/ s. Institute of Hotel Management , Catering Technology & Applied Nutrition , Government of India Enterprise , ATI Campus ,

Vidyanagar , Hyderabad -7. Respondents Appearances:

Forthe Petitioner K. Ravindra Goud, Advocate .

For the Respondent : P. Damodar Reddy, Advocate.

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A(2) of the I.D. Act , 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

2. On 30-8-2005, the counsel for the petitioner filed a Memo withdrawing the claim of the petitioner as the petitioner is not interested to contest the case due to personal reasons. Acordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Dictated to Shri P. Kanaka Raju , LDC transcribed by him, corrected by me and given under my hand and seal of this Court on this the 30th day of August , 2005 .

T. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence No oral or documentary evidence adduced on either side .

13081

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर 2005

का. आ.4451 .- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण, गोदावरी खानी के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 52/- 2004) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-09- 2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 22013/1/2005 - आई आर (सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 28th October, 2005 S.O. 4451. - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.52/ 2004) of the Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Godavari Khani as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of S.C.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-09-2005 .

[No. L- 22013/ 1/2005 - IR (C -II)]

N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT:

Smt . K. Suvarchala, M.A. , B.L, Chairman-cum-Presiding Officer Wednesday the 17th Day of August, 2005. Industrial Dispute No. 52 of 2004.

BETWEEN :

Panuganti Rajaiah, S /o . Ramlu , Age 41 yrs . , Ex -Coal Filler, E.C. No. 0904783, R/o..H.No. 17-4-240/17, Tilak Nagar, Post : Godavarikhani, Dist. Karimnagar, A.P. Petitioner And

1. The Chairman & Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , Ramagundam,

Dist. Khammam , A.P. ,

2. The Chief General Manager, S.C. Co. Ltd. , Ramagundam Area- I , Post: Godavarikhani, Dist. Karimnagar , A.P. ,

3. The Colliery Manager,

GDK-7 (LE) Project, Post: Godavarikhani ,

Dist. Karimnagar , A.P. Respondents .

Thispetition coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri B. Santhan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner and of Sri D. Krishna Murthy, Advocate for the respondents and having stood over for consideration till

this date, the court passed the following:-

AWARD

1. The petitioner filed the petition U/Sec . 2 -A(2 ) of I.D. , Act, 1947 to set- aside the office order dt . 4-8-2003 passed by the 2nd respondent dismissing the petitioner from service w.e.f. 7-8-2003 and to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service, all other consequential benefits and full back- wages.

2. The averments of the petition are as follows:-

The petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler in the respondents company on 7-11-86. He was promoted and confirmed as Coal Filler. During the years , 2000, 2001 , the petitioner suffered serious ill health. He had taken treatment for body pains and joint pains in the respondents company hospital , dispensaries and other hospitals.

I.D. No. 52/2004.

Hehad reported sick and had put in 69 musters during the year, 2001. Charge sheet was issued on 28-4- 2002 with the following charge:-

"C.S.O. No. 25. 25 Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause" .

Enquiry was conducted and the respondent No. 2 dismissed the petitioner from service w.e.f. 7-8-2003 , which isillegal , arbitrary, unjust and violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution ofIndia. The enquiry was conducted in mechanical manner without giving proper opportunity to the petitioner . The signatures of the petitioner were obtained thereon, without explaining the contents. No documents are supplied to the petitioner nor list of witnesses was given to him, enabling him to defend effectively. The petitioner had taken treatment for joint pains of knees , body pains and back- ache . He was also compelled to take treatment during the year 2001 for jaundice. There is no wilful or intentional absence on the part of the petitioner. He had put in more than 250 to300 musters in the year 1996, 220 musters in the year 1997, 175 musters in the year 1998 and 163 musters in the year 1999. The petitioner had worked 17 years continuously in the respondents company i.e. 1986 to 2003. He had put in 69 musters and was short of 31 days for the required 100 musters during the year, 2001 , due to serious ill-health.

The capital punishment of dismissal from service is shockingly dis - proportionate and do not commensurate with the gravity of alleged charge of absenteeism. Ever since his dismissal from service , he remained un -employed and could not get any alternative job. He hails from a very poor family and has got no other source of income , except this job . Hence, he filed the petition for the above said relief.

3. To this , the respondent No.3 filed counter. The responents 1 & 2 filed memo adopting the counter filed by respondent No.3 . They denied the averments of the 13082

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5, 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

respondents company is that this Tribunal is not having jurisdiction to entertain the ID stating that the respondents company is a Central Government Organisation. The point forconsideration is whether this court having jurisdiction over the dispute or not ?

petition. The respondents company a Coal Mining Industry and the appropriate Government is Central Government. There is Central Government Industrial Tribunal at Hyderabad established from 29-12-2000 . The petitioner ought to have approached the said Tribunal for the redressal ofhis grievance. Section 2 -A(2 ) is statement amendment Act and it is not applicable to the respondents company. The petition is not maintainable under law and is liable to bedismissed.

8. The Advocate for the petitioner argued that Sec . 2-A( 2 ) is applicable to the workman working in Coal Industry also and this petition is maintainable before this Court. While arguing so , he cited I.L. Naidu and others Vs. Union of India and others reported in 2003 (2 ) ALT -470 . Their Lordships held:-

"The contention that Sec . 2 - A(2 ) of I.D. , Act is not applicable to a Government of India under- taking is wholly misconceived. In view of the provisions of Art. 254 (2 ) of the Constitution, the provisions of Sec . 2-A(2) incorporated by A.P. , Amendment Act , 32/87 are valid and operative. It is not limited to the " State Industries" as contended by the petitioner . The State Legislature was competent to enact the entire of the Industrial Disputes Act , for its operation within the territory of A.P. The provisions of Sec . 2 -A(2 ) having received the assent of the President , the workman ofCentral Government Industry also can raise the dispute U/Sec . 2-A(2 ) of the I.D. , Act . Therefore, the contention of the respondents company that Sec. 2- A(2 ) is not applicable to the petitioner is without merit or force".

9. The advocate for the petitioner also cited U.Chinappa Vs. Cotton Corp. of India and others , reported in 1998 (5 ) ALD - 16 (DB) . Their Lordships held that :

" There is no warrant to restrict this scope and amplitude of the wide phraseology " any workman" employed in Sub- Section (2) of Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act , to the employees working in the State Government Industries and it is also applicable to the employees of the Central Government Industries and the industries carried -on under the authority of the Central Government" .

The petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler in the respondents company on 18-5-1986 and was confirmed as Coal Filler, as per his seniority. He had put - in only 69 musters during the year, 2001. Charge sheet was issued on 28-4-2002 under clause No. 25.25 of the approved standing orders of the respondents company. The petitioner had never taken any treatment in the respondents hospital . He did not submit his explanation. The petitioner attended the enquiry on 26-9-2002 . The contents of the charge sheet and the enquiry procedure were explained to the petitioner in Telugu. He participated in the enquiry duly put - in his thumb impression on the enquiry proceedings . He voluntarily admitted the charge levelled against him and pleaded guilty of mis -conduct . The petitioner did not choose to cross-examine the management witnessses . Before the enquiry officer, he stated that due to ill - health, hecould not attend for his duties regularly in the year , 2001 and took treatment . He wouldbe careful in future and voluntarily admitted the charges . The charges levelled against the petitoner are proved in the enquiry and show cause notice was issued on 13-11-2002 . After receipt of show cause notice, he submitted his representation on 10-6-2003 and requested the company to excuse his misconduct as first offence. He did not improve his attendance during the year 2002. The respondents company dismissed the petitioner from service from 7-8-2003 vide office orderdt. 4-8-2003 . The petitioner could have availed the medical facilities provided by the respondents company in the company hospitals , Smania General Hospital and NIMS etc. , if he was really suffering from ill - health. He intentionally avoided to apply for leave and absented for his duties un- authorisedly. The respondent had taken the action as per the rules . Hence, this petition may be dismissed.

In the light of the above decisions , it is quite clear that the petitioner can raise the dispute U/Sec . 2 - A(2 ) of I.D. , Act, though he worked in the Coal Mine. Hence, the point is answered in favour of the petitioner.

4. On behalf of the petitioner, Ex . W. - 1 to Ex. W -24 aremarked.

Onbehalf ofthe respondents , Ex.M - 1 to Ex.M - 10 are marked.

5. Heard both sides .

10. The next contention raised by the respondents is that they are maintaining the hospitals at all levels . The petitioner had never taken any treatment in those hospitals and he was not really sick . The respondents filed documents Ex . M - 1 to Ex. M - 10 . Ex. M - I is the office copy of the charge sheet . The ack. , of the petitioner Ex . M- 2 . Enquiry notice was issues to the petitioner i.e. , marked as Ex.M-3. Office copy of the letter appointing. The enquiry officer dt. 16-6-2002 is marked as Ex.M-4. The enquiry, proceeds. , are marked as Ex.M-5.

6. It is an admitted fact that the petitioner was appointed in respondents company on 18-5-86 as Badli Fillerand hewas confirmed as Coal Filler. The charge framed against the petitioner is for his un-authorised absence during the year, 2001. The defence putforth by the petitioner is that due to ill-health, he could not attend his duties regularly in the year 2001.

Inthe enquiry, one T. Sridhar Rao was examined as MW- I . He has been working as P.O.A. , at GDK . No.7 LEP Incline . He deposed that the petitioner was transferredto 7. The first and foremost point raised by the 13083

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Ex.M-6. Show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner i.e. , marked as Ex. M -7 . The representation of the petitioner to the show-cause notice is marked as Ex.M-8 . The dismissal order is Ex. M-9 , and Ex.M- 10 is notice . The petitioner was given opprtunityto defend himself from the date of issuing chargesheet . The enquiry conducted by the respondents in held as valid.

13. Now the point for consideration is whether the punishment of dismissal from service is justified and whether the petitioner is entitled to any relief ?

GDK . No. 6- A Incline in the month of April , 2002. He remained absent from duties on a number ofdays while he worked at GDK.7 LEP, during the calender year, 2001 as indicated in the chargesheet . He had put in only 69 actual musters in the year, 2001. The petitioner was not paid any wages for those absented days . MW - 2 is P. Kanthaiah , Clerk , GDK. No.7 LEP. He deposed that he was giving the pay slips of the coal filler in Relay ' C ' of the Mine . He noticed that the petitioner absented to his duties without leave or intimation on a number of days as mentioned in the chargesheet. He had put - in only 69 actual musters in the year, 2001. He was not paid any wages for those absented days .

The fact that the petitioner was absent to duties in the year, 2001 is an admitted fact. There is no contradiction. But the version of the petitioner is that due to ill - health only. He was absent. To prove his oral version , he filed several medical certiticates marked as Ex . W -4 to Ex. W-24.

While arguing that the punishment of dismissal for service given to the petitioner is dis -proportionate, the Advocate for the petitioner cited 1996 FLR- 1582 between Richardson and Cruddas ( 1972) Ltd. and Association of EngineeringWorkers & others . In that their Lordships held that the punishment of dismissal from service for habitual absence the Labour Court can reduce the punishment U/Sec . 11 - A of I.D. Act, if it found disproportionate to the attributed mis-conduct .

The Advocate for the petitioner also cited 1995 ( 1 ) ALT- 744 between M.Krishnam Raju Vs. The ECIL . Hyderabad and others . In that their Lordships held that mere absence an employee without leave at his credit is not a mis -conduct . If he is able to show acceptable cause for his absence and if he has no leave to his credit , extraordinary leave without pay shall be granted. The employee could establish acceptable cause for his absence by producing medical certificates. , His lordships held that the absence cannot therefore be mis -conduct under Service Regulations and the punishment imposed was unsustainable .

14. In the present case , the absence of the petitioner fromduty during the year , 2001 , is supported by the medical certificates marked as Ex. W -4 to W -24 . He has put in only 69 musters against the required 100 musters. This is the first offence committed by the petitioner. He had rendered 17 years service to the respondents company i.e. , from 1986 to 2003. There is acceptable cause for the absence of the petitioner during the year, 2001. Therefore, the punishment of dismissal is not warranted and it is not justified. A lesser punishment is suffiient to meet the ends ofjustice. Hence, the dismissal order passed by the 2nd respondent dtd . 4-8-2003 is set - aside and the respondents aredirectedto take the petitioner into service as coal filler inthe same capacity in which he was working at the time of his dismissal, with continuity of service , but without back- wages on production of Medical fitness certificate . Denial ofback -wages is sufficient punishment to the petitioner.

11. The statement of the petitioner is also marked asEx.M- 5 . He stated that during the year, 2001 , his health was not good. He was suffering from severe joint pains of knees , back ache and also with jaundice . He had taken treatment in a private hospital , Godavarikhani . He stated that he absented for duties , but the reasons stated by him are that he fell sick and he took treatment in the hospitals . Insupport of his oral version, he filed medical certificates and other documents a marked as Ex . W- 1 to Ex.W- 24. Ex. W- 4 is the area hospital medical certificate from 4-2-2001 to 16-3-2001. Another certificate showing treatment given to the petitioner for pains from 21-3-2001 to 11-4- 2001 is marked as Ex. W- 5 . The medical prescription given to the petitioner by the Area Hospital , Godavarikhani are marked as Ex . W-6 to Ex. W-8 . The medical certificate issued by the Area Hospital , Godavarikhani showing treatmentto the petitioner for entric fever from 1-7-2001 to 19-7-2001 is marked as Ex . W- 9 . The pathological investigations . urine andblood report of the petitioner given by Ambica Clinical Laboratory, Godavarikhani dtd . 2-7-2001 is maked as Ex . W- 10 . The medical prescription given by the Ambica Hospitals , Godavarikhani on 2-7-2001 is marked as Ex.W - II . Ex. W- 12 is the blood report of the petitioner, The medical certificate of the area Hospital , Godavarikhani for viral fever treatment given to the petitioner from 20-8-2001 to2-9-2001 is marked as Ex . W- 13 . The medical investigation reference of the petitioner made by Kishore Diagnostics , Godavarikhani , dt. 18-10-2001 is marked as Ex. W- 14 . Ex . W-- 15 is the medical presription and treatment given to the petitioner by theGovt . Hospital, Godavarikhani . The medical certificate issuedby the Area Hospital , Godavarikhani showing treatment given to the petitioner from 23-12-2001 to 31-12-200 lis marked as Ex . W- 16. The medical certificate issued by the area hospital , Godavarikhani showing the treatment given to the petitioner during the year, 2000 are marked as Ex. W- 17 to Ex. W -22 . The Superintendent, Area Hospital ,Godavarikhani referred the petitioner to the OsmaniaGeneral Hospital , Hyderabad for CT scan ofbrain as he lost the power and censation of left upper limb and left lower limb. The CT scan report of the NIMS Hyderabad i.e. is marked as Ex . W-24 . N.P. 12. The enquiry proceedings are marked as Ex.M - 5 and the enquiry report is marked as

In the result, the petition is partly allowed. The 13084

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

dismissal order dtd. 4-8-2003 is set aside and the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner into service in the same capacity in which he was working at the time of his dismissal from service , with contiunity of service, but without back -wages on production of Medical Fitness Certificate . The period from the date ofdismissal to the date of reinstatement shall be treated as ' not on duty' . There shall be no order as to costs .

Typed to my dictation , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this , the 17the day of August , 2005.

Smt K. SUVARCHALA , Chairman-cum -Presiding Officer.

Appendix ofEvidence

Witnesses Examined

ForWorkman :-

NIL

ForManagement

Exhibits

ForWorkman :-

Ex.W- 1 4-8-2003 Dismissal Order, X -copy Ex.W-2 10-8-01

NCWA -VI Arrears work sheet-cum-Pay sheet 1996-97 to 2000-01 .

Ex.W-3 4-1-01

Lr. issued to Petitioner by Supdt. , ofMines GDK (LE) . Project.

Ex.W-4 16-3-01

Fit. certificate issued by SCCL .

Ex.W-5 11-4-01

Fit. certificate No. 485 .

Ex.W-6 1-4-01

AreaHospital prescription slip Ex.W-7 7-4-01

Hospital slip

Ex.W-8 28-5-01

Hospital slip

Ex.W-9 19-8-01 Fitcertificate slip

Ex.W- 10 2-7-01 Blood report issued by Ambica Hospital

ExW-11 2-7-01 Prescription treatment of Ambicahospital .

Ex.W- 12 2-7-01 Blood report issued by Ambica Hospital

Ex.W-13 2-9-01 Fitslip of Areacs Hospital 18-10-01

Ex.W-14

Kishore Diagnosti Hospital Ex.W- 15 12-12-01 Govt.Hospital O.P. deptt, prescription slip

Ex.W-16 31-12-01 AreaHospital fit slip

Ex.W- 17 5-6-2001 Fitslip issued by area hospital Ex.W-18 5-7-2000 Fitslip issued by area hospital

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] Ex. W- 19 18-10-2000 Fit slip issued by area hospital Ex.W-20 25-9-2000 Fit slip issued by area hospital Ex.W-21 27-11-2000 Fit slip issued by area hospital Ex.W-22 21-12-2000 Fit slip issued by area hospital Ex.W -23 16-11-94 Lr. addressed to the Supdt, Osmainia General Hospital ,Hyd, by the medical Supdt . Area Hospial.

Ex.W -24 27-12-99 CT Scanreport of petitioner issued by NIMS , HYD .

ForManagement:--

Ex.M- 1 28-4-2002 Charge Sheet

Ex.M-2 1-7-02 Ack, to Charge Sheet

Ex.M-3 12-9-2002 Enquiry Notice

Ex.M-4 16-6-2002 Office Order, X copy.

Ex.M-5 26-9-02 Enquiry proceedings

Ex.M-6 1-10-02 Enquiry Report original Ex.M-7 13-11-02 Show/ cause notice

Ex.M-8 10-6-03 Reply to Show/cause notice 4-8-03

Ex.M-9 Dismissal Order

Notice .

Ex.M- 10 28-8-2003

नई दिल्ली, 28 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ.4452.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 21/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/147/2002- आई आर ( सी- II ) ]

एन० पी० केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th October , 2005

S.O.4452 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 21 / 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workman, received by the Central Government on 28-10-2005 .

[No. L - 22012/ 147/2002 - IR ( CM - II) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

Case No. CGIT- 21/2003 .

Reference No. L- 22012/ 147/2002 - IR(CM -II) Sh.Govind Prasad,

S/o Sh. Tara Chand Meghwal ,

R/o Village-Gajsar, Tehsil & Distt . Churu ,

13085

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

the Corporation has acted in contravention of the provisions contained under Secion 25 -F, 25 -G and 25 - H of the Act respectively and has urged that his termination order be declared as unjustified and illegal and he be reinstated in the service with its continuity and all consequential benefits.

Applicant

Churu Distt. (Raj .)

Versus

1. The District Manager, Food Corporation of India, Division Bikaner (Raj) .

Bikaner

2. The Assistant Manager (Depot ) , Food Corporation of India , Churu,

Non - applicants

Distt. Churu (Raj . )

PRESENT

Sh. R.C. Sharma.

Presiding Officer:

Sh . C.D. Chaturvedi.

Forthe applicant:

Sh . P.C. Shah .

Forthe non- applicants:

29-09-2005 Date of Award:

AWARD

1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause'D ' of sub - sections 1 & 2 (A) to Section 10 of the Industrial disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as the ' Act ' ) has referred this industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under:-

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of workman Sh. Govind Prasad S/o Shri Tarachand w.e.f. 27-6-2001 (AN) is legal and justitied ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ?"

2. The workman has pleaded in his claim statement that he was employed as a Sweeper on 11-7-2000 at Chomu Depot, who continuously worked there till 27-6-2001 , but by an oral order his service was terminated w.e.f. the afternoon of 27-6-2001 . He discharged all the jobs there similar to that of a 4th class and had completed 240 days of continuous service with the non - applicant corporation. He has stated that prior to his termination neither the notice was served on him , nor the pay in lieu of the notice and retrenchment compensation were paid to him. He has further stated that at the time of terminating his service , the Corporation had retained the junior employees to him and subsequent to his termination one fresh hand namely Kana Ram was employed without affording him an opportunity of employment . Thus , the claimant has pointed out that 3276 G1/05--29

3. In turn, the non - applicants , in their written counter have disputed the claim and have denied that the disputant was employed as a Sweeper on 11-7-2000 , and that his service was ever terminated on 27-6-2001 by the Corporation and have specifically averred that the Corporation floats the tender for assigning its work to the contractor or who provides the labourer to the Corporation for which the contractual amount is being paid to the contractor, as such, no relationship of employer and employee existed between both the parties and the present controversy does not fall within the ambit of Section 2( 00 ) ofthe Act. They have also denied any contravention under Section 25 - F, 25 -G , 25 -H and 25 - N of the Act . Futher elaborating their stand, they have mentioned that the workman's services were made available by the contractor occasionally to the Corporation as per the requirement on the exigencies of work and for properly discharging the workby the labourers , the attendance record is maintained by the Corporation . They have further pointed out that the disputant had worked as a contract unskilled labourer belonging to M/s Gopal and Party from 16-1-2001 and prior to it he was working under the former contactor Mewa Ram. As per their averments , the workman had completed only 122 days of work under the employment of the contractors and that both these contractors were licence holders.

4.On the pleadings ofboth the parties , the following points for determination were framed:-

I. Whether the workman was appointed to the post of 4th Class employee on 11-7-2000 by the non- applicant Corporation , who continuously worked up to 27-6-2001 ? BOA II . Whether the service of the workman was terminated w.e.f. 27-6-2001 in violation ofprovision contained under Section 25 - F of the Act ? BOA III. Whether at the time of terminating the service of the workman, the junior employees to him were retained by the Corporation in violation of the provisioncontained under Section 25 -G and Rule 77 ofthe Central Industrial Rules , 1957 ? BOA

BOA IV. Whether after the termination of the workman, fresh hand, viz . , Shri Kana Ram was appointed by the Corporation in violation of the provision under Section 25-H of the Act ?

V. Relief, if any.

5. In the evidence, the workman has submitted his 13086

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] affidavit and on behalf of the non -applicants, the counter- affidavits ofMW- 1 , Shanti Lal Sharma, the Assistant Depot Manager and MW- 2 Phoolchand Ruhela, Assistant Depot Manager have been brought on the record. All these witnesses were cross -examined by the respective opposite representatives Both the parties have also led the documentary evidence on the record..

6. I have heard both the parties and have scanned the record. The point -wise discussion follows as under:- Point Nos. I & II

7. Both these points involve the common questions offacts and law, hence they are being discussed together hereunder,

contracts Ex . M- 1 and M-2 and these contractor supplied the labourers to the Corporation on the request of the Corporation. The Id. representative further elaborating the case contends that the disputant was provided to the Corporation byMewa Ram in July, 2000 , whose attendence was recordedby the Corporation to supervise his work, but the payment ofwages to him was not directly made by theCorporation. The contractual amount was paid to the contractors who disbussed it to the workers . The workman'service was again provided by M/ s.Gopal and Party,whoworked till June, 2001 and to prove the fact that the payment of wages was made by the contractors , the Corporation has produced the payment sheets Ex . M - 3 to M-8 , through which the wages were received by the workman. Lastly, the Id. representative submits that the disputant was not an employee of the Corporation but he was a contract labourer and , therefore , the question of terminating his service by the Corporation does not arise.

10. I have bestowed my thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions and have carefully gone through the decisions referred to before me.

11. Theworkman's case is that he was employedby the Corporation during the period in question and the contracts Ex. M- 1 and M-2 relied upon by the Corporation are sham contracts. Contrary to it, the Corporation has set forth a plea that the handling and transporting work was assigned to the contractors and the disputant was employed as a labourer by the contractors whose services were provided to the Corporation and that the relationship ofemployer and employee did not exist between the two.

12. The underlying principles for ascertaining the controversy are exhibited in the decision cited in 1978 Lab. L.C. SC 1264 , wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as below :-

8. TheId. representative for the workman contends that theworkman had joined the service ofthe Corporation w.e.f. 11-7-2000 , who continuously worked up to 27-6-2001 , buthis servicewas terminated w.e.f. the afternoon of27-6- 2001 in violation of the provision under Section 25 -F of the Act. The Id. representative further contends that it is shown onbehalf of the Corporation that he was employed by the. contractor, but in fact he was employed by the Corporation and the Id. representative on this point has placed his reliance upon the letters Ex. W- 1 and Ex. W- 2 , which according to assertion indicate that he was working with the Corporation. Then the Id. representativehas reliedupon the attendance sheets Ex. W-4 to Ex. W- 14 by arguing that the attendance of the workman during the working hours was maintained by the Corporation itself, which shows thathewas an employee ofthe Corporation. Apart it, the Id. representative has indicated towards the monthly statements of employment of labourers Ex. W- 15 to W-25 in support of his submission that the workman was an employee of the Corporation . As per his contention , in the preceding calendar year from July, 2000 to 27-6-2001 , the workman had completed 232 days along with 54 Sundays and holidays and on including them the total number of working days comes to 286 days . The ld. representative has assailed that the contracts produced on behalf of the Corporation are sham and camouflage .

"Where aworker or group ofworkers labours toproduce goods or services and these goods or services are for the business of another, that other is, in fact, the employer. He has economic control over the workers ' subsistence, skill, and continued employment. Ifhe , for any reason , chokes off, the worker is , virtually, laid off. The presence of intermediate contractors with whom alone the workers have immediate or direct relationship ex contractu is ofno consequence when, on lifting the veil or looking at the conspectus offactors governing employment, we discern the naked truth , though draped in different perfect paper management , that the real employer is the Management, not the immediate contractor."

9. Responding to these submissions , theld . representative for the Corporation contends that for the purpose of adjudicating the question under Section 25 - F oftheAct, there must be direct evidence to this effect that the disputant was appointed by the Corporation. His submission is that the Corporation is governed by the Act ofParliament andits acts are guided by the rules. No person can be appointed without proper authorization and an appointment letter is required to be issued in his favour. The ld. representative contends that the workman has made out a case that he was appointed as a 4th Class which is incorrect and the work of handling and transporting was given to the contractors by inviting the tenders . The contractorsMewa Ram and Gopal and Party executed the

13. Similarly, in (2004) 1 SCC 126, relied upon by the workmen, the Hon'ble Court has laid down that for determination of the employer -employee relationship , the factors to be considered are the control , the integration , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

viz . , the employee has been fully integrated in the employer's concern or is independent of it, the power of appointment and dismissal , the liability to pay remuneration anddeduct insurance contributions, liability to supply tools and materials , the nature of mutual obligations andterms and conditions of contract which are to be assessed. The Hon'ble Court has further observed that whether the employer retains control over the means and work tobe done by the contractor, the relationship of employer- employee exists.

14. In the another decision renderedby the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Steel Authority of India's case reported in(2001) 7SCC 1 , the Hon'ble Court has dealt with this issue as to whether on a contractor engaging contract labour in connection with the work entrusted to himby a principal employer, the relationship of master and servant between him , the principal employer and the contract labour emerges. The Hon'ble Court has observed asunder:-

"Where a workman is hired in or in connection with thework of an establishment by the principal employer through a contractor, he merely acts as an agent so there will be master- and - servant relationship between the principal employer and the workman. But where a workman is hired in or in connection with the work of an establishmentby a contractor, either because he has undertaken to produce a given result for the establishment or because he supplies workmen for any work of the establishment , a question might arise whetber the contractor is a mere camouflage as in Jussainbhai case and in Indian Petrochemicals Corpn. Caseetc.; ifthe answer is in the affirmative, the workman will bein fact an employee of the principal employer; but ifthe answer is in the negative, the workman willbe acontract labour. "

15. It is in the light of these observations made by theHon'ble Apex Court that the points in issue under this title aretobe analyzed and adjudicated.

16. The pivotal question, therefore, which now crops up for consideration is as to whether the relationship of employer and employee between the Corporation and the workman existed on account of the privity of the contract or not and whether the contracts Ex . M - I and M - 2 are camouflage.

17. So far as the period of work in question is concerned, the workman in his claim statement has stated that he had continuously worked w.e.f. 11-7-2000 to 27-6-2001 with the Corporation who was discharging all theduties similar to that of a 4th Class and had completed 240 days of continuous service with the Corporation . It has also been noted that though he was employed as a Sweeper, but the work of the 4th Class was also taken from

13087

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

himby the Corporation . The workman to substantiate his plea has reled upon the letters Ex . W- 1 and W- 2, the attendance sheets Ex. W-4to W- 14 and monthly statements ofemployment of labouers Ex . W- 15 to W-25 . Ex . W- 1 is the letter dated 20-9-2001 addressed by the Assistant Manager, Depot Chomu to the Assistant Labour Commissioner and the ld. representative has invited my attention to its para 4 which says that Govind Prasad, the workmanhas completed 122 days as a contract labour during the currency ofcontract of M/ s Mewa Ram from July, 2000 to 16-1-2001 . It further says that he had worked only for 110 days through the contractor M/ s Gopal and Party.

18. On a bare perusal of this letter, it is crystal clear that the workman was not employed by the Corporation but his services were raade available by the contractors . Similarly, Ex. W- 15.10W -25 are the monthly statements of employment of labourers maintained by the contractors MewaRam andGopal and Party. These statements, 100, do not depict that the workman was einployed by the Corporation, rather they fortify the plea set forth on behalf of the Corporation that the disputant was a contract labourer.

19. It has then been strongly contended on behalf of the workman that his attendance was marked by the Corporation authorities and in support of this submission , the attendance registers Ex. W-440 W - 14 are relied upon, wherein the attendance ofthe workman from the month of July, 2000 to the month of Mrs. Mi is borne out. Refuting thissubmission, on behalf of she Corporation, it has been emphatically contended that the attendance of the workınan was marked by the Corporation authorities in order to supervise his work . Therefore, in the light of the contracts Ex . M- 1 and M-2 , it is to be washed as to whether the disputant was in fact the amplovee of the Corporation or his services were hired by the contracior to carry out the work entrusted to them by the Corporation The contract Ex. M- 1 was executed between wa Ram. Contractor and the Corporation for handling and transporting the foodgrain bags which was for a period of two years commencing from 7-1-99 and the another contract Ex: M- 2 was entered into -between the contractor Gopal and Party and the Corporation which became effective from 18-1-2001 for a period of two years. I have carefully gone through the terms and conditions of both the contracts. which contain all the essential terms and conditions with regardtothe performance of the work and the mode ofthe payment. Clause 24 ofboth the contracts respectively states that the contractor shall provide such number of male or female casual labourers whenever asked to do so at short notice during day or night by an officer of the Corporation. Itfurther fixes the payment of wages of the casual labourers and defining the duties of the labourers so supplied, it states further that they can be asked to do fumigation/ brushing/dusting/ spraying or pumping cyanogas with foot pumps whenever necessary. The functions to be carried 13088

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] outhave alsobeen described therein as loading/unloading and staking of crates etc. In addition to it , the Corporation has also adduced the payment sheets Ex.M -3to M-8 whereby the payement of wages was made to the workman byM/s Gopal and Party for the period mentioned therein. These payment sheets have been duly signed by the workman after acknowledging the amount ofwages . These receipts clearly demonstrate that the wages were received bythe workman from M/ s Gopal and Party, which goes to establish that the contractor had the economic control over hislabourers . With the assistance of these documentary evidence, the Corporation has endeavoured to establish that the workman was employed by the contractors respectively, who was provided to it for carrying on the work assigned to the contractors .

there was a direct relationship of employer and employee between the immediate contractors and the workman. No sufficient and trustworthy evidence could be led on behalf of the workman to cast a shadow of doubt on these contracts that they are sham in natrure. Accordingly, the workman could not be able to prove the essential elements which could establish the relationship of employer and employee between him and the Corporation. In the light of the priciples enunciated in the judicial verdicts supra and onfacts of the dispute , the submission canvassed on behalf of the Corporation that no nexus of master and servant exists between the contesting parties is strengthened. The ld . representative for the workman in support of his sumission has placed his reliance on 2003 LLR SC 817 , which I have carefully gone through , but suffice it to state that the facts thereof having distinguishable features are not applicable to the case at hand.

23. On account of the foregoing discusssions , it is held that the workman has not succeeded to establish that he was employed by the Corporation and that the relationship of employer and employee existed between the two . As such, he is not entitled for the protection under Section 25 -F of the Act and both these points are decided against him and in favour of the Corporation. Point No. III

24. The ld. representative for the workman does not press this point, which is decided against the workman. Point No. IV

20. Turning on the oral evidence collected on the record WW- 1 Govind Prasad, the workman in his cross- examination has stated that no appointment letter was issued to him on behalf of the Corporation. But he has admitted that he had received the payment of wages from the contractors . He has also admitted that at first Mewa Ramwas the contractor after whom the work was takenby the contractorGopal and Party. So far as the nature of the work isconcerned, he has disclosed that he used to sweep the office and the godowns and was also doing the job of cleaning the wheat. Thus, the testimony of the workman demonstrates that the payment of wages was made to him bythe contractor and the works performed by him fall within the category ofthe jobs narrated in the contract deeds .

25. The workman in his claim statement has pleaded that one person named Sh . Kana Ram was engaged in his place on his termination . He has also reiterated this fact in his affidavit. In his cross -examination, though he has stated that he was appointed subsequent to his termination, but he was unable to point out as to after how many days he was employed and whether he is still working with the Corporationor not .

26. This fact has been denied on behalf of the Corporation and MW - 2 Phoolchand Ruhela in his affidavit has categorically stated that the Corporation never employs directly any worker, nor Kana Ram was ever employed in place ofGovind Prasad by the Corporation . No question couldbe put to him in the cross -examination on this point .

21. MW- 1 Shanti Lal Sharma, the Assistant Manager, Depothas stated that at the relevant time he was posted at Chomu Depot and the work of Corporation was entrusted to the contractors Mewa Ram and thereafter Gopal and Partyvide contracts Ex. M - 1 and M-2 . He has categorically stated that the service of the workman were provided by the contractors to the Corporation. In his cross -examinaton he has emphatically replied that the workman's service was made available to the Corporation through the contractors , whowas performing the jobs as narrated in the schedule of the contract. MW-2 Phoolchand Ruhela , the Assistant Depot Manager has corroborated the evidence of MW - 1 Shanti Lal Sharma and has stated in his cross -examination that the employment statements from Ex . W- 15 to W-25 havebeen prepared by the contractor . He has also explained that the attendance sheets Ex. W-4 to W- 14 were prepared by the contractors which carry the counter signature of the Assistant Depot Manager.

27. The workman has failed to adduce any sufficient evidence on this point to prove that Kana Ram was employed by the Corporation as a daily wager and his evidence available on the record is inadequate , which cannot be relied upon . Therefore, he has failed to discharge the onus of this issue , which is accordingly decided against him.

Relief

28. For the foregoing reasons , the workman has not succeeded to establish that he is entitled to get the benefits under Section 25 -F and 25 -H of the Act . Accordingly, he is entitled to no relief and his claim is liable to be rejected.

22. Thus on a close scrutiny of the evidence , documentary as well as oral , adduced by both the parties on the record, it is manifestly clear that the work of handling and transporting was entrusted by the Corporationto the contractors who employed the workman inorder to carry out the said work , who had in fact the supervision and control over the work and had also exercised the economic control on him . The payment of wages was made by the contractors to the workman and

29. In the result, the reference is answered in the negative against the workman and in favour of the 13089

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1997 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

management and it is held that the termination order dated 27-6-2001 passed by the Corporation against the workman is legal and justified and the claim of the workman is dismissed. An award is passed in these terms accordingly.

30. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17 ( 1 ) of the Act.

R. C. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

"Whether the new Mangalore Port Trust Trade & Technical Certificate Holders Associaton members are discriminated against in service matters and promotional avenues by the management of New Mangalore Port Trust ? If so , to what relief they are entitled ?"

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर 2005

2. The case of the first party union as made out in the Claim Statement is as under:-

That the trade certificate holders /diploma का. आ.4453.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार न्यू मैंगलोर पोर्ट ट्रस्टके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 275/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-45011 /3/97- आई आर ( एम ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005

S.O. 4453. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 275/' 97) of the Central Government Industrial - Tribunal -cum Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of New Mangalore Port Trust and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-10-2005.

[No. L-45011 /3 /97 -IR (M) ]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE-560 022.

Dated: 21st October, 2005

PRESENT:

Shri A. R. Siddiqui , Presiding Officer

C.R. NO. 275/97

IIParty

IParty

The Chairman,

The Secretary,

NewMangalore Port Trust, Panambur,

Mangalore

NMPT Trade Technical Certificate Holders Association, 8th Avenue , Door no . 1 , NMPT Colony, Panambur, Mangalore

AWARD

Craftsmanship are working in varius cadres in NMPT. Though the Trade Certificate Holders are working continuously for several years , the Second party has totally neglected them in the matter ofpromotions , scale of pay and other service matters. the Second party did not properly implement the skilled scheme and as such even after a period of30 years the Trade CertificateHolders come only in the Cadre/Grade of high skilled Grade II . At the same time , the non- technical staffs who possess less qualificaiton and length of service have been given the post of foreman. Junior Engineer and Junior Engineer Grade -1 in the engineering department ; that the Second Party has created a new post ' skilled artisan ' vide order No. C- 13019 /30/PE II dated 28-6-1994 . The Trade Certificate holders come under skilled Artisans. Strongly even beforepreparingthe list ofskilled artisans, the second party has redesignate some of the employees without required qualifications as Junior Engineers who reached the pay scale of Rs . 1385/-. On account of this, the trade certificate holders who are qualifiedto the post of skilled artisans are still in the lower pay scale inspite of the fat that they are working under the Second Party for the last 30 years . This anomaly was created on account improper promotions . The Skilled Artisans/Trade Certificate holders are entitled to be promoted by giving higher pay scale in view of their qualifications and length of service; that the High Court of Karnataka had quashed the scale of Rs . 1320/- of the chargeman (Auto and workshop ) but still 4 employees are still working in the pay scale ofRs. 1320/-in that Engineering Department . That an employee with the educational qualification 4th from is being given the post of Assistant Foreman (Carpenter) the pay scale of Rs. 1350/- within a period of 14 years of service . At the same time a Trade CertificateHolder working in the same sub -division isstill designated as High Skilled Grade -II in the pay scale of Rs . 1220/- even after 30 years of experience ; that the order dated 28-6-1994 issued by the Ministry of Surface Transport (Port Wing ) a degree holder, a Diploma Holder or a skilled Artisan are entitledto the post of Junior engineer (Rs . 1385-2545 ) . Junior 1.The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredby clause (d) of sub -section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred the dispute vide order No. L-45011 /3 /97 - IR (Misc .) dated 27th October, 13090

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927 [PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ]

awardwith a direction to the management to give proper promotions to Trade & Technical Certiicate Holders asperlaw.

4. The management by its Counter Statement while resisting the claim of the first party union interalia contended as under :-

Engineer Grade- III (Rs . 1405-2715 ), Junior Engineer Grade- II (Rs . 1435-2755) . As per the present policy adoptedby the second party a skilled artisan cannot reach the post of a Junior engineer in the normal course. Those persons who have been promoted to the above posts are being promoted overlooking seniority, and other qualifications ; that in the matter ofpromotions and pay scale there is vast discrepancy between the Diploma Holders and Trade Certificate Holders . The initial pay scale of a Deploma holders isthe scale ofRs. 1385/-which the Trade Certificate Holder cannot reach on account of the present policy ofthe SecondParty. That a Diploma holder can reach the post of an Assistant Engineer from the post of Junior engineerwithin a period of 15 years and their fitment is fixed up to the level of Executive Engineer ; that there are 41 catergories of posts in engineer trades. The second party has only recognised the draftsmanfor recruitment and promotions , ignoring the office memorandum issued by the Ministry of Labour and employment, Govt. of India . The other engineering trades listed in the office memorandum issued by the Minister of Labour and Employment aretotally neglected by the second party. On account ofthis the trade certificate holders have suffered the most in NMPT. The second party is still recruiting TradeCertificate holders in the pay scale ofRs . 1075 which is aGrade Lower than Skilled Grade- III . There is no promotional scope for those are appointed in the pay scale of Rs . 1075. This is a clear discrimi- nation meted out to the Trade Certificate holders ; that on account of incorrect and improper policy adopted by the Second Party, the less qualified and employees with lesser period of service have been posted to the Higher post of Foreman /Junior Engineer and Junior Grade- 1 ; that the trade certificate holders are stagnated in the lower posts without any properpromotion and in lesser pay scale. The second party has expanded the sub-divisions for sanction ofmore number of higher posts without subordinate posts.The second party is giving promotions without any proper policy and mostly under influence; that inspite of repeated demands , the second party has failed to concede to the lawful and reasonable demands of the first party. That even during conciliation proceedings , the second party did not evince any interest . As such the conciliation proceedings before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ended in failure; that the trade certificate holders are entitled to be promoted upto the post ofAssistant Engineer.

That the terms of reference made by the Central Government is not specific about dispute involved, it is vague in nature and dealing with discrimination ingeneral in the matter ofpromotion ofTrade Certificte Holders/Diploma in craftsmanship working in Second Pary establishment . The claim statement also does not contain any specific issues the relief sought in the claim statement is to pass an award directing the second party to give proper promotions to trade certificateholders as per law, it denied that the second party has neglected the trade certificate holders in the matter of promotions , scale of pay and other service matters . It is also denied that the second party did not implement the skilled scheme properly. The skilled scheme was approved by the Govt. for the second party establishment only during the year 1995 as approved vide order N. LB - 12014 / 1 /95 -RO dated 7-7-1995 . It is incorrect to state that non- technical staff who posses less qualification and length ofservice have been give the post of foreman, Jr. Engineer, Jr. Engineer Gr. 1. In the second party establishment promotions are given as per the provisions of NMPT Employees Recruitment Seniority and promotions regulations 1980, and re-designation of certain posts are effected as per Govt. of India Ministry of Surface Transport letter No. C- 13019/20/24-TE - II dated 28-6-1994. Such re- designations were not applicable to the categories ofworkmen represented by the first party Union .; thatwhile denying the contentions made by the first party the re -designations referred to in para3 ofthe Claim Statement relates to officials working in the Civil Engineering Department , especially in Draftsman Cadre , such re -designation was done as pertheGovernment letter dated 28-6-94 referred to in para 2 above. The cases of the first party Union are coveredunder the Skilled Scheme for the port trust, a copy of the skilled scheme is annexed to this statement as Appendix - 1 . Under this scheme the workmen are entitled for time bound promotions and the scheme is being implemented properly. Therefore, the claim ofthe first party that skilled artisan/trade certificate holders are entitled for higher pay scales etc. is not justified; that the case referred to under para 4 of the claim statement relates to an anomaly occurred at the time re -classification of pay scales. Consequentto the formation of Port Trust Board in the Second Party Establishment on 1-4-1980 and the 3. Therefore, the first party prayed this tribunal to hold that Trade and Technical Certificate holders ofNMPT are discriminated against the service matters and promotional avenues by the management and pass an 13091

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

tenable. Such a comparison is not accepted in any of the establishments under the Govt . of India including the Major ports . The Draftsman category of Engineering Departments are having separate channel of promotions in the second party establishment. Their promotions are governed by the provisions of NMPTE (Recruitment, Seniority and Promotions ) Regulations , 1980. Whereas , the ITI Certificate Holders in other trades are covered under the skilled scheme at present and are having time bound promotion . In the case of Draftsman their promotions are subject to availability of vacancies . It is incorrect to say that the Trade Certificate holders ofthe second party establishment have suffered the most . In the absence of any specific case suffering , the second party deny this contention . At the same time no employee of second party establishment who has put in more than 15 years continuous regular service in a post has been denied promotion . The promotional avenues are provided under the skilled scheme in respect ofemployees covered by it. In the caseofothers , promotional avenues are provided in the NMPTE (RSP) Regulations , 1980. It is not known the person about whom a reference has been made in this para and in the absence of such details the contentions of the first party are baseless and denied; thatthe statement made in para 8 of the claim is very vague in nature and, therefore , denied. All the appointments /promotions in the second party establishment are made in accordance with the provisions of NMPT (RSP) Regulations, 1980 and the skilled Scheme. That the first party has not made out a case of stagnation of employees in a particular pay scale for want of further promotion. Merely a vague statement is made in this regard. The other contentions made by the first party in this para are incorrect and therefore , denied . That it is totally incorrect to state that the second party has failed to concede the lawful and reasonable demands ofthe first party. In fact the second party have promoted a number ofworkmen to higher posts during the last 3 years. As already mentioned above , promotions were given to all the employees who have put in more than 15 years continuous regular service in a particular grade or post. That the Asst . Engineer's post in the second party establishment is a Class II post in the pay scale ofRs . 4000-7150 (Pre - revised). The post is filled as per the provisions of NMPTE (RSP) Regulations , 1980. It is a promotional post for engineering diploma holders with two years ofregular service as Jr. Engineer/Tech.Asst . For direct recruitment also , the minimum qualification is EngineeringDegree with two years ofexperience in the relevant field. An extract of the relevant page of Recruitment Regulations is annexed hereto as Appendix IV. Therefore the contentions of the first partythat Trade Certificate holders are entitled for reliefgrantedby the Court was a pay scale equivalent to or comparable to the pay scale which the said employeeswere drawing in the Central Scales ofpay whichwas prevalent as on 31-3-1980. Therefore, the said case has no relevance to the present claim of the first party Union (workman ). However, similar pay scales were not given to the employees who werepromoted as Chargeman or Asst. Foreman after 1-4-1980 because they did not draw their pay in the Central Scale in the particular post . Under the skilled scheme, an employee who was put in 30 years of service after the introduction of the scheme will definitely get 3 to4 promotions and the highest being highly skilledGr . I in the pay scale ofRs . 2420-4430. The cases referred to in para 4 may be pertaining to theemployees who had put in 20 or 25 years ofservice but prior to the introduction of skilled scheme . But even in their cases also they have secured 2 or 3 promotions after joining the service ; that the order dated 28-6-1994 ofthe MOST referred to in para 5 of the Claim Statement relates to re-designation of certain engineering personhel who are already in pay scale of ( 1 ) Rs . 1385-2545 (2) Rs. 1405-2715 (3 ) Rs . 1435-2755 (4) Rs . 1470-2000 . There was no skilled artisan in any one of the above pay scales in the second party establishment as on 28-6-94 and therefore, the question of application of the said Government order to the first party workmen does not arise.Merely because a person was designated as Skilled Artisan, he is not entitled for the designationofJr. engineer, JE.Gr. II or III. Foreligibility tohave the designation ofJr. Engineer , Gr. I, II, III etc. is the pay scales and not the designation. Because ofthe above said Govt . order and redesignation of post no employee was given higher scale of pay. The intentions behind the said order was to have a uniform designation for a post having a particular scaleofpay in all the Major Ports and not to upgrade or reclassify pay scales of any category. The other contentions made in this para are not true and therefore deenied; that the ITI certificate holders cannot be equated to the Diploma holders . The DirectorateGeneral ofEmployment and Training, New Delhi in its letter No. DGET 5/ 1 /97 -TC dated 31st March, 1997 have clarified that the Diploma in Craftsman training is not equivalent to the EngineeringDiploma awarded by the respected State Governments (copy enclosed as Appendix- II). The SecretaryBoard ofTechnical Examinations , Govt . of Karnataka,Bangalore in his letter No.BTE-24 ERS (2) 94/9452 dated 2-2-1995 had also clarified that the National Trade Certificate awarded by NCVT is not equivalent to Diploma in Engineering discipline awarded by the State Board of Technical Examinations. Therefore , the claim ofthe first party forequivalency in pay scales between an engineering diploma holder and ITI certificate holder is not 13092

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

promotion to the post of Asst . Engineer is incorrect and hence denied ; that there is absolutely no discrimination against Trade and Technical certificate holders in the matter of promotions/service as stated in the Claim Statement . The Claim Statement is not based on facts and figures . It is of general nature and in the form of a charter of demands for creation of more promotional avenues . The first party have not established the existence of an Industrial dispute between its members and the second party and also the specific nature of the dispute.

5. The management examined one witness as M1 and got marked the documents at Ex . Ml to M7 . No evidence is led by the first party union. His statement in examination chief is as under:-

"In various categories , trade and Technical. certificate holders are working with us since a long time, long back certificate was called as Diploma in Craftsmenship . As per the approved recruitment rules, the above employees are eligible for promotion indiffrent grades and various eategories . In 1995 , a skilled scheme was introduced for the skilled workers. The Trade and Technical Certificate holders and others with experience were also called as skilled workers . In the year 1995 , skilled workers scheme was approved by Govt . of India. Until then there were approved recruitment rules for various categories ofpost . Skilled workers were not entitled for the designation of Junior Engineers . Skilled workers were not discriminated for promotion and service conditions, but they were rules subject to availability of vacancies . At this stage , counsel for the management wants to file some letters issued by Ministry of Surface Transport and some gazette notifications and circulars and minutes . The counsel could also have filed earlier this documents. With list in the tribunal , so that, first party could know that documents were relied by the management. The counsel for the first party objects for their marking. His contention that these documents are not filed in thetribunal earlier with list is justified. Management isdirected to file documents with list till then the evidence is deferred. "

6. There was no cross examination on the above statement ofMW 1 on the part of the first party Union and the first party Union also did not adduce any evidence either by examining any office bearer ofthe first party Union much lessor the President or the General Secretary or by producing any employee of the management who had any grievance against the management with regard to the service matters and promotions denied to him and others.

7. When, the matter was taken up for argument, learned counsel for the management while referring to the above said statement of MW1 and the documents marked in his deposition submitted that the first party union has failed to establish the case before this tribunal that its members have been discriminated in the service matters and in promotional avenues . On the other hand it is the management who produced the oral and documentary evidence to substantiate the contentions taken in the Counter Statement that there was no injustice or indiscrimination made against the members of the first party union either in service matters or in the matter of promotions . He contended that the ' skilled scheme ' was approved by the Govt . for the management only during the ear 1995 as per the order dated 7-7-1995 . The case ofthe first party union are covered under the above said ' skilled scheme' of the management. Therefore, the workmen are entitled for time bound promotions under the abovesaid scheme, and the scheme is being implemented properly. He also contended that the claim of the first party union that skilled Artisan and Trade Certificate Holders are entitled to higher pay is again not justified.

8. After having gone through the records , namely the testimony of MW1 and the documents referred to supra and in view of the fact that first party union remained indifferent to the proceedings on hand in not adducing evidence on their part and in not cross examinining MW1 , I find substance in the arguments advanced by the management .

9. From the reading of the aforesaid points of reference , first of all as contended for the management, the reference itself is very much vague there being no specific issue raised by the union as to how and in what manner and against which members of the union , there was discrimination in the matters of service and promotions . Even otherwise as per the abovesaid point of reference it was the duty of the first party tunion to have come forward and to substantiate the various contentions taken by it in itsClaim Statement . No only the first party union failed to produced any oral or documentary evidence in support of the contentions taken in the Claim Statement but also it failed even to cross examine the management witness in whose oral testimony, the contentions taken by the management in the Counter Statement get substantiated. Therefore, Statement of MW1 having gone unquestioned and unchallenged and there being no evidence at all by the first party union in support of its claim , this tribunal is left with no alternative but to hold that the first party union fails to establish that its members suffered any discrimination in the matter of service and promotional avenues. Hence the following award.

AWARD The reference is dismissed. No order to cost.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signedby me on 21st October 2005 ) .

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer 13093 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4454-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीनियर सुपरिन्टेन्डेन्ट ऑफ पोस्ट ऑफिसेस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 144/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/ 158/2001- आई आर ( डीयू) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005

S.O. 4454. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 144/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Sr. Supdt . of Post Offices and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 31-10-05.

[No. L-40012/ 158/2001 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

Theworkman's case in brief is that he was employed in Gangroo post office under Asstt. Supdt . Post Offices, Mansoori , Dehradum in the temporary arrangement as EDDA and he continued to work till 11-10-2000 continuously and worked for over 240 days in every year. It is also alleged that he has not been given any notice , notice pay or compensation as provided in the I. D. Act . 1947. Worker has therefore requested for reinstatement with full back wages . The opposite party has filed written statement alleging that present dispute has barred as the opposite party is not covered under the definition of the industry. It is also alleged that here is arrangement in the Indianpost offices that whenever regular EDDA goes on leave or is put off duty and the post of EDDA is vacant, it is the responsibility of regular EDDA to engage some one in his place as substitute and when such regular employee returns back on the post the services of EDDA automatically stands terminated and this arrangement is also applicable in the case of present worker. Sri Rajendra Singh was removed from the post of EDDA and therefore Sri Gajendra Singh EDDA was appointed temporarily in the said post office. Sri Gajendra Singh who was a regular EDDA engaged Sri Bir Singh to subtitute him . As soon as Sri Gajendra Singh resumed his duties the services of the substitute Sri Bir Singh automatically came to an end. The opposite party has denied thatthey have terminated the services of Sri Bir Singh . It is submitted by the opposite party that there is no violation of the provision of I. D. Act , 1947 .

ANNEXURE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

Worker has filed the letter of Asstt. Supdt. Post Offices,Mansoori letter No. B/EDDA/ GANGROO/98 dated 1-9-98 and the photo copy of case law 1 ( 1998 ) SLT 9 Supreme Court of India General Manager, Telecom Vs. S. Srinivasa Roa & others and affidavit .

PRESENT:

Opposite party has filed photo copies of the following documents:

Shrikant Shukla, PresidingOfficer L.D. No. 144/2001

1.Order oftheGovt. of India Deptt . of Communication postoffice No. 17-94/91-ED and training of 1996.

Ref. No. L-40012/ 158/ 2001/ IR(DU) Dt . 28-8-2001

BETWEEN

2.Charge certificate of the Gajendra Singh and Sri Bir Singh dt . 11-10-2000.

3. Charge certificate of Gajendra Singh and Sri Rajendra Singhdt . 11-10-2000.

Sri Bir Singh S /o Sh. Param Singh C/o BhartiyaMazdoor Sangh, 32 , Chakrata Road, Dehradun - 248001

AND

4. Order of Supdt. Post Offices memo No. B -EDDA/ 64 dt. 28-9-2000 .

The Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices Mansoori Division Dehradun-248001 (Uttrancnal)

5. Letter of Asstt. Supdt . Post Offices B /EDA/G7 dated 5-9-98 .

AWARD

6. Sr. Supdt. Post Offices , Dehradun division No.SP/ ORR-01 98 dated 3-7-98 .

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi vide his order No. L -40012/ 158/2001 / IR(DU) Dt . 28-8-2001 referred the following dispute to presiding officer, CGIT -cum- Labour Court , Lucknow for adjudication .

The oppositeparty has also filed affidavit of Sri M.K. Verma, Asstt. Supdt. Post Offices , Mussoori (Dehradun) together with photo copy of charge certificate dt. 28-3-2000, 30-3-2000,5-4-2000 and 11-10-2000,

Theopposite party has cross -examined Bir Singh . Representative of worker declined to cross examine the Asstt. Supdt . Post Offices Sri M. K. Verma.

"Whether the action of the management of Sr. Supdt. of Post Office in terminating the services of Sh. Bir Singh EDDA w. e . f. 11-10-2000 is just and legal ? if not , to what relief the workman is entitled to?"

3276 G1 / 05-30 13094

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

Partiesdid not turned up on the date of argument i.e. 20-10-05 therefore they could not heard.

This has been admitted by the worker Bir Singh in his cross-examination that he was appointed as substitute ofSri Gajendra Singh on 1-8-98 and he handed over charge on 28-3-2000 . It is also admitted that on 1-4-2000 he was again engaged as substitute in place of Sri Gajendra Singh and the charge was handed over back to Sri Gajendra Singh on 5-7-2000 and again on the same day he again took over charge as substitute as it is also admitted fact that Bir Singh continued to work up to 11-10-2000 as substitute as stated in the affidavit of Sri M.K. Verma . In the circumstances it is proved that Sri Bir Singh worked as substitute from 1-8-98 to 28-3-2000, 1-4-2000 to 4-4-2000 and 5-4-2000 to 11-10-2000 .

Section 2 (00) reads as under :

" retrenchment " means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason what- soever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action but does not include-

(a) Voluntary retirement of the workman ; or

Nagesh and others Vs. Asstt . Supdt . of Post Offices Bangalore South Division and others in which the Hon'ble High Court has held that when an extra department agent wasappointed by the Department proceed of leave , such agent is permitted to make temporary arrangements by appointing anyone of his choice as a substitute until he returns from leave .The substitute appointment is sporadic , depending on the period during which the regularly appointed employee on leave for whatsoever reason . In fact having regard to the peculiar natures of the Extra Departmental Agents appointment when they apply for leave they have to give the name and particulars of the substitutes who will discharge their duties during the leave period. Such substitute appointments are not made by the department but by the Extra Departmentel Agents themselves (subject to opproval of the department ) . On the other hand provisional appointments are made by the department on the retirement of regular incumbents , pending regular Recruitment. Such provisional appointees. appointed purely staff gap are continued until regular recruitment is made . Sometimes such provisional appointments becomes necessary where the permanent incumbent to the post is put off duty. Pending disciplinary proceedings . The appointment on provisional basis is governed the following instructions contained in DGP& T'sletter dt. 18-5-79 read with circular dated30-12-99 .

(b) retirementof the workman of reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or

In the present case the regular appointee Sri Gajendra Singh substituted his services by Sri Bir Singh who worked as detailed above.

(bb) termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non- renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein , or

1998 Supreme Court Cases (L& S) 447 Union of India and others Vs Kameshwar Prasad Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held that the system and object of engaging EDDAs which is reproduced below:

The engagement of substitute Sri Bir Singh was not that oftemporary regular nature and it was known to him that his appointment was till the regular employee takes over charge from him and resumed the duties . In the circumstances its engagement is not retrenchment under section 2(b ) & (bb ) . Even if the worker has completed 240 days of service he is not entitled to any notice, notice pay or retrenchment compensation as provided in the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The worker's termination therefore is justand legal and does not suffer from any illegality and in the circumstances worker is not entitled to any relief. Lucknow 20-10-2005

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर, 2005 The Extra Departmental agents system in the Deptt ofPost and Telegraphs is in vogue since 1854. The object underlying it is to cater to postal needs of the rural communities dispersed in remote areas . The system avails ofthe services of school master, shopkeepers , landlords and such other persons in a village who have the faculty of reasonable standard of literacy and adequate means of livelihood and who , therefore, in their leisure can assist the Department by way ofgainful avocation and social service inministering to the rural communities in thier postal needs , through maintenance of simple accounts and adherenceto minimum procedural formalities , as prescribed by the Department for the purpose.

का. आ. 4455.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार प्रोजेक्ट एण्ड डेवेलपमेन्ट इंडिया लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या कम्पलेन्ट नं. - 2/2002 , कनेक्टेड विद आई डी नं.- 10/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The opposite party has filed the photo copy of certified copy of judgement passed by the Hon'ble High Court, Karnataka at Bangalore dt . 18-8-2001 between D.M.

[सं. एल-42012/55/98- आई आर ( डीयू) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्कअधिकारी 13095 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/ अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005 New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005

का. आ.4456.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947

का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार प्रोजेक्ट एण्ड डेवेलपमेन्ट इंडिया लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 10/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

S.O. 4455. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. Complaint No- 2/2002 Connected with ID- 10/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No.II, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Project and Development India Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 31-10-05

[सं. एल -42012/55/98- आई आर ( डीयू) ] [No. L-42012/55/98- IR C(DU)]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी KULDIP RAI VERMA Desk Officer

NewDelhi , the 31st October, 2005 ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT -IL, NEW DELHI

Complaint No. 2/2002

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI

Connectedwith I. D. No. 10/1999

In the matter of:-

S.O.4456.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 10/99 ) ofthe CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No.II, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Project and Development India Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 31-10-05

[No. L-42012/55/98 -IRC(DU)] Shri Gajendra Kumar Sharma, 336, DDA Flats, Badarpur, New Delhi-110044 .

KULDIPRAI VERMA, Desk Officer VERSUS

ANNEXILE

TheManaging Director,

Projects & Development India Limited, A-14, Sector-A, Noida - 201301 , Uttar Pradesh .

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL, TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT-- IL, NEW DELHI

I.D. No. 10/1999

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI

COMPLAINT NO . 1/2002 UNDER SECTION 33 A OF LD . ACT, 1947 CONNECTED DIFFERENCE 106/1991

In the matter of:

Shri Gajendra Kumar Sharma , 336, DDA Flats, Badarpur, New Delhi-110044.

VERSUS

TheManaging Director,

Projects& Development India Limited , A-14, Sector-A, Noida- 201301 .

Uttar Pradesh.

The complainant has filed conplain under Section 33 Aof I.D. Act, 1947 as their services were terminated while pendancy ofdispute before the Labour Commissioner (C). I. D.No. 10/1999 is related to the same matter and it has been found that the workmen do not deserve to be regularized and the case ofthe mar.agement is just and fair. They have not been given any reljef in the main reference. They should have filed this complaint before the Labour Commissioner who embarked upon conciliation proceedings but they have filed before this Tribunal/Court . In this aspect of the matter also the complaint is not maintainable.

AWARD

No order can be passed in complaint under Section 33-Aof the I.D. Act, 1947 when regularization is denied in the main reference i.e. 10/1999 .

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L -42012/55/ 98/IR (DU) Central Government Dt.,30/ 11-10-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication ORDER

The point runs as hereunder:

The complaint under Section 33 -A of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is dismissed.

" 1. Whether the action ofthe management ofProject and Development India Limited in terminating the R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer 13096

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] services of Shri Gajendra Kumar Sharma , Rakesh Kumar Sengar and Rajesh Kumar Singh w.e.f. 6-6-1991, 19-6-1991 and 4-6-1991 respectively is legal andjustified?

vide his order dated 19-6-1991, 4-6-1991 & 6-6-1991 served termination notices without even observing the principle of last come first go. (Photo copies of the orders are annexed as Annexure - 7, 8 & 9 and forms part of the petition.

2. Whether the action of the management is not regularizing the services of S/ Shri Gajendra Kumar Sharma, Rakesh Kumar Sengar and Rajesh Kumar Singh w.e.f. 16-4-1990 , 3-7-1990 and 18-7-1990 respectively working as Draftsmen is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to."

That on a perusal to the appointment letter, it indicates that certainterms were made , under which only, the services canbe terminated. The same has been mentioned in para 2 of termination notice of the company. We submit that we have done nothing during the course of employment in the company which may jantamount to violation of terms of employment. The terms of employment indicates the grounds but the same can not be dealt without examining the facts as to whether we have contravend all or any of the conditions given in the appointment orders, rather the management have verified having no complaint about the work and conduct of the petitioners .

Theworkmen applicants have filed claim statement . a the claim statement they have stated that they were appointed along with others as Draftsmen (Mechanical) in Project and Development India Limited. (A Government of India Undertaking) Siddtharth, 90, Nehru Place, New Delhi- 110019 on a consolidated pay of Rs . 3000, Rs . 2500 & Rs. 2500 per month respectively on " contract basis" for a period of one year in contravention of clause 3 of standing orders certified under Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) , Dhanbad letter No. 16 (2)/85 -B, 4 dated 16-10- 1986. A copy of above letter and clause 3 are enclosed for this truth . Annexure 1 & 2 .

That the management had ample vacancies to continue our services as will be evident from the fact that services of many Draftsmen including juniors were extendedand continuing and fresh appointed while serving termination notices to the petitioners . One of the copy of appointment letter dated May 1 , 1991 has been procured and enclosed as Annexure- 10 and forms part of this petition.

That the management has been a new paper advertisement dated 7-12-1991 for the post of Junior Draftsmen and Senior Draftsmen. A Photostat copy of this advertisement is enclosed for this truth . Annexure - 11 forms part ofthis .

That Civil Misc . (Caveat Application ) dated 28-2-1992 submitted by the management in the High Court ofAllahabad, UP out of 20 workmen listed therein 10 have been regularized and given full benefits including junior than the petitioners a copy of this caveat application is enclosed as Annexure - 12, forms part of this petition .

That after the caveat application dated 28-2-1992 listing 20 Draftsmen in including the petitioners along with their juniors mentioning the dates of appointment and subsequently extended and likely to expire on 31-5-1992 , the management dealt petitioners differently and issued another letter dated 4-3-1992. Photostat copy enclosed as Annexure- 13 and form part of this petition.

That the appointment on " contract basis" was acceptedonly because there was unemployment prevailing in the country. That according to para 2 of appointment letter, we (Trio) were allowed benefit of appointment as permanent employee . Para 1 (b) was a illegal clause introduced against out appointment order which inter-alia stated that management reserve the right to terminate our appointment at any time by one month's notice or pay in lieu thereof, if in the opinion of the management our employment in the company is not found satisfactory, for reasons of health ground, guilty of misconduct or misbehaviour or absenting without intimation and sanctioning. It was also directed to give one month's notice in case workmen desire to leave before the expiry of the contract period. That item 4 to 15 of the contract was to keep us in the grip at the advantage ofthe company. That we accepted the terms and conditions due to the financial difficulty and prevailing un-employment . That before accepting the service , we had to appear before Medical Board and other formalities including interview for appointment as regular employees . Photo copies of appointment letters dated 16-4-1990, 3-7-1990 & 18-7-1990 oftrio are enclosed for this truth. Annexure 3,4 & 5 our appointment letters are to be treated as part of petition.

That a general notice was given to the employees of Project and Development India Limited signed by the Chairman andManaging Director dated 15-7-1991 para 5 of this General Notice shows requirement of more than 40 Draftsmen by the management. Notice also says work was suffering due to shortage of Draftsmen. A copy of this notice enclosed as Annexure - 14 , for this truth and forms part of the petition .

ThatAsstt. Personnel Officer of the management vide their order dated 26-4-1991 extended services of Shri Gajendra Kumar Sharma for three months up to 30-7-1991 onthe sameterms and consolidated salary of Rs . 3000 per month (Photostate copy of the order dated 26-4-1991 is annexed as Annexure -6 and forms part of the petition.

That the work load was so heavy that the petitioners along with other staff have been doing constantly overtime on working days and holidays even then the management was under pressure to given work to outside agencies on That the Asstt . Personnel Officer of the management 13097

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

contract basis . A copy of press notice dated 16-08-1993 and an application for Registration of contractors dated 04-10-1991 are enclosed for this truth Annexure - 15 & 16 and forms part of the petition .

design specifications . However, in view of the nature of these projects, some work still needs to be done by the management in relation to the design of some parts of such plants. In addition to this the management also undertakes the execution of engineering , procurement , erection and commissioning of some small chemical plants where also the engineering and design work performed by the management is of limited nature only.

That Project and Development India Limited (Employer) was in commanding position, gave appointment for regular nature of work on " contract basis " on consolidated salary in violation to the standing order of the company to other persons also viz , Peons , Steno, Accounts Clerk , Computer Operator etc. and merely adopted unfair tactics and terminated us inspite of there being work to deny the benefits of Industrial Disputes Act . The petitioners are continuing on the same consolidated salary since appointments without any revision . Whereas in some other cases , the consolidated salary is being revised from time to time .

That against the illegal orders of the management (Annexure 7, 8 and 9 ) we had to take legal action available.

(a) Representation by all ( 34 ) Draftsmen appointed on contract basis against the illegal termination order dated 24-06-1991to the management which is self explanatory is annexed as Annexure - 17 and forms part of the petition . The management was not courteous even to acknowledge and reply.

(b) That the representation was filed to Dy. Labour Commissioner, Ghaziabad, Government ofUP in the matter of an Industrial Dispute on 26-06-1991 . Copy ofwhich is enclosed as Annexure - 18 and forms part ofthe petition.

(c) That the management filed a reply to our representation dated 26-06-1991 copy of which is enclosed as Annexure - 19 before the Dy. Labour Commissioner, Govt . of UP, Ghaziabad, forms part of the petition.

That for this purpose , the management has on it's roll a large number of engineers and drafting staff such as Tracers, Draftsmen , Designer , Foremen, General Foremen and Senior General Foremen. These persons are employed on a regular basis . The number of regular posts sanctioned for such appointments are assessed on the basis of the normal requirement of the management . However, fromtime to time due to the exigencies of work the quantum of drafting work goes up for short durations at peak periods . In such cases, the Draftsmen on the regular rolls of the management can often not cope up with the increased workload. Such requirements are therefore met by taking draftsmen on temporary basis for short durations and in such cases, the salaries that are offered are usually substantially higher than those payable to the regular employees for simlar jobs. The candidates also do not have to go through the rigors of the selection process that is prescribed for recruitment to regular posts . The offers of appointment made to such persons clearly stipulates that their appointments would be for fixed periods only and such periods are clearly stipulated in their offers ofappointment . It is also clearly stated therein that their services would stand terminated on the expiry of such period unless they are advised to the contrary in writing in advace . It is also clearly stated that they would have no claim for regularization or for transfer to other offices of the management . The applicants herein were given precisely such offers of appointments .

(d) That the management refused any relief to us in respect of our employment in the Company.

Thatthe applicants herein freely accepted the offers of appointment as made and accordingly, came into the services of the management on the terms indicated therein.

That in the meantime considering the action being taken by the management even during the pendency of Industrial Disputes , there was no alternative than to knock to the door ofHigh Court ofjudicature of Allahabad in writ peition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India (No. 18904 of 1991 ).

That upon the expiry of the periods of contract as stated in their offers of appointment (or upon the expiry of the extended periods of such contracts ) , these applicants were informed vide letters dated 06-06-1991, 04-06-1991 and 19-06-1991 that their services would come to an end upon the expiry of their respective contracts w.e.f. the respective dates as indicated therein. No separate termination of service was effected by such letters .

That upon receiving such letters , the applicants herein, along with some other Draftsmen who had been similarly appointed on contract , raised an industrial dispute by filing a statement of claim before the conciliation officer at Noida , in the State of Uttar Pradesh . At those proceedings the management filed its written statement indicating the position as indicated above and after a The management has filed written statement . In the written statement it has been stated that the management is a Government of India Undertaking which comes under theMinistry of Chemicals and Fertilizers . It is responsible for doing the detailed engineering , procurement, erection and commissioning of large fertilizer projects comprising mainly of ammonia and urea plants . The basis design and technology of these plants , is supplied by various companies which have expertise in the respective fields . The role of the management is limited to executing these projects according to the prescribed technological and 13098

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] rejoinder was filed by the applicants and their colleagues , that matter was closed and nothing has been heard on the matter ever since i.e. 31-12-1991 .

Without prejudice to what is stated above, it is stated that all the allegations and insinuations as contained in the statement of claim/ written statement are denied except in so far as they are expressly admitted in this written statement. Parawise reply to the statement of claim/written statement of the workmen is as under .

The applicants are put to strict proof of their contention that they accepted the appointments as offered only because of unemployment prevailing in the country. In any case, it is submitted that the circumstances prevailing in the country would have no bearing on the question of the status of the applicants when they knowingly and willingly accepted appointments on contract basis. They also had not to put the management to notice that they were accepting such appointments under such circumstances only. It is submitted that after having availed thebenefit ofservice for the period as offered vide the said letters , they cannot be allowed to resile from the other clauses of the same agreement and to contend that such other clauses would not apply to them.

That meanwhile , and even while the proceedings before the said Conciliation Officer were still pending the present applicants filed a petition under Article 226 and 227 ofthe Constitution of India before the Allahabad High Court praying inter alia that directions be issued to the management to continue to employ them in service despite the fact that their service contracts were coming to an end byefflux of time. The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court gave an interim direction that the orders vide which the applicants had been informed of the expiry oftheir contacts wouldnotbe given effect to. Accordingly, the management kept those orders in abeyance and continued these persons in service. Ultimately, vide orders dated 02-07-1997, the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court has been pleased to dismiss the said petition. An appeal filed against the said order was also dismissed by a Division Bench of the Hon'ble AllahabadHigh Court on 30-07-1997. In these circumstances the applicants have now invoked the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Tribunal praying for the same relief.

It isdenied that according to para 2 of the offers of appointment, the applicants were allowed the benefit of appointment as regular employees. It is submitted that clause 2 of their offers of appointment does not make any such representation or confer any such right on the applicants. It is also denied that clause 1(b) of the offers or appointment of the applicants were illegal in any way. It is submitted that the power conferred vide clause 1 (b) could be exercised in the circumstances mentioned therein and upon the expiry of their contracts by efflux of time, the applicants stood automatically terminated and the power conferred vide clauses 1 (b) was not required to be exercised.

That meanwhile , the respondent company became sick and in the year 1992 , was referred to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR ) . Vide its orderdated 1st July, 1997 the BIFR finally approved a rehabilitation package for the respondent company which included inter alia a reduction of surplus manpower . The respondent company has been under the strict monitoring of the BIFR and the operating agency M/s. ICICI since then. The target of reduction in the surplus manpower as fixed by the BIFF has still not been achieved by the respondent and the respondent is in loss for the current financial year as well . Under these circumstances , the continuation of the applicants herein and/ or their regularization would result in an increase in the strength of the company and will cause a setback to the company's efforts of rehabilitation/revival .

It isdenied that there was anything illegal in what was prescribed vide clauses 4 to 15 of their appointment letters . It is also denied that the applicants accepted such terms and conditions due to their own financial difficulties and/or prevailing unemployment. In any case these matters would have no bearing on the merits of the claim made by the applicants. It is for each party to handle its own difficulties and cannot pass such difficulties on to third parties which are in no way responsible for them and that too without informing such third party of such intentions before hand and even as the first party derives a benefit from such third party. As stated in brief facts above, the Company being industrially sick stood referred to the BIFR in 1992 and its revival package which inter alia includes reduction of surplus manpower, has been approved by the BIFR in July, 1997 and the company is still under the strict monitoring of the BIFR and its operating agency M/ s . ICICI . The company has still not achieved the target of reduction in its surplus manpower, which it is trying to achieve through the operation of Voluntary Retirement Schemes (VRS ). Continuation of these applicants in service or their regularization will result in increase of staff strength and That it is therefore, evident from the foregoing that the applicants wish to selectively choose clauses from their offers of appointment which would apply to them and to reject those which they do not like . This is despite the fact that the offers of appointment were composite offers not capable of being severed and the applicants had accepted such offers knowing fully well the conditions that would apply to them in that case . They have thus not only taken the benefit of the periods of service as prescribed under the said offers , but they have also had the benefit of more than 7 (seven) more years of employment under the management because of the interim orders of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court as stated above . In these circumstances, it is submitted that the present claim is entirely misconceived and may be dismissed at the very threshold.

13099

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

contractual periods of their appointments with the management . The person who was appointed on May 1, 1991 was obviously appointed much before the impugned orders were passed in the cases of the applicants herein and was also subject to the same contractual terms . In viewofthe fact that the management had already engaged the services of other Draftsmen on contract basis and their temporary requirement had already been met, the services ofthe applicants herein were not required any further.

will cause a setback to the company's efforts to reduce surplus manpower to which the company is committed before the BFIR and M/ s . ICICI . It is submitted that in view ofthese facts , the applicants be not ordered to be continued in service . It is further submitted that in case the circumstances of the applicant and/or those prevailing in the country are to be taken into consideration while deciding the merits of the present dispute , then the difficulties being faced by the company as stated may also bekept inview.

It is clarified that several of the persons who had beengiven temporary appointments on the contract basis had applied for recruitment to the regular services of the management as and when vacancies for such posts had been advertisedby the management . Some of such persons having qualified for such appointments were given regular appointments to such posts . Their appointments were fresh appointments and did not relate back to their initial orders ofappointment as temporary employees on contract basis . It is therefore incorrect to say that their services were regularized. It is further submitted that the mere fact that they were junior to the applicants herein on the basis of their dates of appointments as temporary employees on contract basis would have no relevance to the matter since they applied for and were selected for such posts on the basis ofopen competitive examinations.

It is denied that the applicants went through the same formalities as would persons who are being considered for employment as regular employees . It is stated for the record that the procedure for appointment to the services of the management on its regular rolls is substantially different from what was followed in the case of the applicants herein. As a matter of fact, in the year 1992, the management had advertised permanent vacancies for the posts ofJunior Draftsmen (Mech) , Senior Tracers (Mech) , Senior Tracers (civil ) and Senior Tracers (Instrument ) . The applicants herein were also free to apply for appointment to such posts and as a matter of fact, applicant nos . 1 & 3 applied for being considered for such appointments . Both of them appeared for written tests and subsequent interviews as prescribed but failed to qualify. The effort on their part vide the present dispute is to seek a back door entry into the regular services of the management despite the fact that they are not meritorious enough for appointment to it . It is submitted that regularizing them in the services of the management would in effect amount to depriving several other persons the right to equal opportunity for being considered for employment in the services of the management as guaranteed by Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India in as much as when the temporary contractual appointments were offered , several other persons who might have considered applying for such posts may not have applied for being so considered which they might otherwise have done had they known that it might entitle them or lead to their being granted permanent/regular status .

Itissubmitted that Annexure- 14 itself makes clear the fact that the management had temporary requirement ofDraftsmen and Engineers in the year 1991 which could have been met by transfer of Draftsmen and Engineers from the Sindri Establishment wherein several such persons were without work . For this reason, the Chairman cum Managing Director issued an appeal to the workers at Sindri to cooperate with the management and to accept transfers. It is submitted that the said appeal is to be read in its entirelyand merely the fact that there was a requirement of Draftsmen and Engineers at the Noida establishment at relevant time would not entitle the applicants herein to any relief whatsoever. It is further stated for the record that at the present time there is very little work with the management and therefore the services of the applicants herein are not required by the management . For this reason aswell , the claim ofthe applicants deserves to bedismissed.

Itis submitted that orders dated 19-06-1991 , 04-06-1991 and 06-06-1991 were not termination notices but merely brought the fact of the completion of the tenures oftheir appointments by efflux of time to the notice ofthe applicants . As far as the allegation that the principle of last come first go was not observed is considered , it is submitted that the said principle is attracted only in cases where the management resorts to retrenchment of workmen. Where a contract of employment of an employee comes to an endby efflux of time , there is no retrenchment and the principle of last come first go is not attracted .

The other Draftsman who had been similarly kept for fixed period contracts even before the services of the applicants came to an end , had yet to serve out the

It is stated that since the employees of the management at the Sindra unit did not cooperate and did not accept transfers to Noida , the management was compelled to seek other ways of completing the work already taken on . In any case , the pleadings in relation to the requirement for employees in the management's services during such period is in any case irrelevant in viewof the tact that the applicants herein have continued tobe in the services of the management during such period by virtue of certain interim orders as stated above . The present dispute having been referred only now, this Hon'ble Tribunal would now only consider the circumstances 13100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] presently prevailing and to adjudicate the claim on that bases. In view ofthe above , no relief may be granted to the present applicants.

Annexure 5 it has been specifically mentioned that appointment is on contract basis for a period of one year so all the three workmen were appointed for a period of one year and prior to their tenure they have been intimated that when their one year tenure is complete, their services shall stand terminated. As such there is no order of termination of services but the workmen were intimated before hand that at the end of one year tenure their services will stand terminated. So the appointment was specifically for one year and the workmen were informed prior to the end of their tenure that on completion of their tenure their services will stand terminated . In the appointment letter itself it has beenmentioned that their appointment is purely temporary and their services will stand terminated at the end of their tenure. Even in between the one year tenure if they are found unfit their services may be terminated after giving one month's notice .

Itissubmitted that the appointments given to the applicants herein were not for work of a regular nature but for work of temporary nature and were therefore on contract basis. Such appointments were not made in violation ofthe Certified Standing Orders applicable to the management . The allegation made with respect of appointment of other persons in the services of the management are wrong and are vehemently denied . It is admitted that the applicants are continuing on consolidated salaries since their dates of appointment because they have continued in the services of the management on the basis ofinterim orders as aforesaid. Such orders did not require the management to pay them anything over and above what they were already getting and therefore , there was no case for revising their salaries .

Theworkmen applicants have filed rejoinder. In their rejoinder they have reiterated the averments of their claim statement and have denied most of the paras of the written statement. The respondents have also denied most of the paras ofthe claim statement.

Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers in the record.

Itwas submitted from the side of the workmen that interview was taken and they were appointed on regular basis.When there is appointment letter, it implies that there iscontract of employment and that contract of employment isfor specific period of one year. The workmen have been informed 1-2 months prior to their completion of tenure that their services will stand terminated. The substantital question to be adjudicated upon is whether the terms of contract are unconciable and the same has been obtained under undue influence . The contract is opposed public policy. In case the contract is opposed public policy and the workmen have entered into contract as they had no bargaining power the contract certainly becomes invalid but in the instant case one year employment has been given in view of exigencies and thereafter an advertisement was given and regular appointment was made . The workmen cannot go beyond the terms of their appointment letter and they cannot say that they have been appointed onregular basis against the permanent post .

7 is a It was submitted from the side of the workmen that Shri G. K. Sharma was appointed on 16-04-1990 at consolidated pay of Rs.3,000/- per month . Shri Rajesh Kumar Sengar was appointed on 11-07-1990 on a consolidatedpay of Rs . 2500/ -and Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh was appointed in 18-07-1990 . There appointment was specific for one year. Appointment of Shri G. K. Sharma was extended for three months only. Annexure letter written from the side of the respondent dated 19-06-1991 that he will be completing his tenure of his appointment on 31-07-1991 and his services will stand terminated on completion of one year tenure on 31-07-1991 . Similarly a letter dated 4th June, 1991 was sent to Shri Radesh Kumar Sengar and it has been mentioned in the letter that he was appointed on 11-07-1990 for one year and after completing one year tenure his services will stand terminated on 10-07-1991 . A letter to Rajesh Kumar Singh dated 06-06-1991 was issued from the side of the respondent that he has been appointed w.e.f. 18-07-1990 and his one year tenure will be completing on 17-07-1991 and his services will stand terminated on 18-07-1990 .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workmen that they were given contractual appointment for one year and they accepted the same as there was unemployment and they were compelled to agree to the terms of the appointment letter. It was submitted from the side of the management that in the appointment letter itself

It was submitted from the side of the management that after the termination of the services of these workmen an advertisement was given. Wide publicity was also made and applications were entertained, written test and interview were taken and appointments were given after following the recruitment process . Appointment for one year was given'as stop gap arrangement and in view of the exigencies. The respondents are Projects and Development India Limited. It was submitted from the side of the respondents that sometimes they are bound to make need based appointment for specific period when there is increase of work as sometimes they are several Projects and sometimes the number of Projects is reduced dose they have to give specific appointment for a particular period in view of the fresh Projects launched . Such employees cannot be taken to be permanent and regular employers . It is settled law that in case an appointment is need based and it is made as stop gap arrangement or in the circumstances ofexigencies of increased work such appointment cannot be treated to 13101

भारत का राजपत्र मवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

be a regular appointment . In the appointments rules also a temporary employee has been defined as a employee for a temporary employee has been defined as a employee for a temporary period . These workmen were given one year appointment and they were intimated before hand that their services will stand terminated at the end of their tenures .

Theworkmen approached Hon'ble High Court in Writ Petition under sections 226 and 227 of the Constitution and they obtained interim order so their services were contained till the writ petition was dismissed . In the meantime regular appointments following due procedure were made by the management . The services of the workmen were extended in view of the interim order ofthe Hon'bleHigh Court ofJudicature at Allahabad . When the writ was dismissed their services were again terminated.

Itwas submitted from the side of the workmen that contract is invalid and it is opposed public policy. The respondents cannot appoint workmen for specific period of one year. The workmen have been appointed for specific period of one year and on a consolidated pay. Some of them have appeared in the written test but they have not been successful . No right has accrued to the workmen as their services were specific for a period of one year in view ofthe need of the work and exigencies of the work. Such employees on Projects cannot be regularized as scheme and projects are not permanent. Under the circumstances the contract for the appointment for specific period is valid and the workmen cannot be regularized as they have not beengiven regular appointment on permanent basis .

It was submitted from the side of the management that the post was to be filled up by transfer of the regular employees but the employees did notjoin their transferred postand sometime is to be taken for appointment in due process of recruitment policy so these workmen were engaged temporarily on a consolidated salary for one year. Such contract of appointment cannot be said to be invalid as it is not opposed to public policy and no right has accrued to the workmen . The respondents advertised the post for selection for suitable candidates , in case these workmen are regularized the suitable candidate will not get employment . Equity and equality is not in favour of these workmen. Appointment has been made through regular process after advertisement, written examination , interview and other tests . These workmen did not avail themselves ofthat opportunity so they subsequently cannot say that their appointment was on regular basis and they should be regularized andtermination is illegal.

It is of course true that preliminary test was taken by the management but that preliminary test was to ascertain their merits . Their appointment is not made on regular basis . The appointment is not even temporary. The contract of employment is for one fixed year so it cannot be extended and they cannot be regularized. The law cited by the workmen applicants is not applicable in present facts and circumstances of the case .

3276 GI/05-31

The reference is replied thus:-

1. The action of the management of Project and Development India Limited in terminating the services of Shri Gajendra Kumar Sharma, RAkesh Kumar Sengar and Shri RajeshKumar Singh w.e.f. 06-06-1991 , 19-06-1991 and 04-06-1991 respectively is legal andjustified.

2. The action ofthe management in not regularizing the services of S/ Shri Gajendra Kumar Sharma, Rakesh Kumar Sengar and Rajesh Kumar Singh w.e.f. 16-04-1990, 03-07-1990 and 18-07-1990 respectively working as Draftsmen is legal and justified . The workmen are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The Award is given accordingly.

Dated: 21-10-2005.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2005

का. आ. 4457.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार न्यू मैंगलोर पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 71/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-10-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-45012/2/98- आईआर ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 31st October, 2005

S.O. 4457. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 71/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour CourtBangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of New Mangalore Port Trust and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-11-2005

[No. L-45012/2/ 98 - IR (B- II)]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT BANGALORE

Dated 20th October, 2005

PRESENT: SHRI A.R SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer

C.R NO.71 / 98 13102

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

I PARTY

II PARTY

The Chairman,

The Secretary,

NMPT Trade and

NewMangalore Port Trust, Technical

certificate Holders

Panambur,

Association,

MANGALORE- 575010 8th Avenue, Door 1 ,

NMPT Colony,

MANGALORE

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredby clause (d) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order. No. L- 450 12/2 /98 /IR (M) dated 28th July 1998 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether there is any discrimination on the part of the management ofNew Mangalore Port Trust in not considering the demand of Shri Mani for promotions and monetary benefits ? If so , to what benefits he is entitled to?"

2.The case of the first party workman as made out in the Claim Statement is as under:- That Shri M.K. Mani , Chargeman (Auto ) in Marine Engineering Division is a member of NMPT Trade and Technical Certificate Holders Association Mangalore - 10; that Shri M.K. Mani was appointed as an Assistant Mechanic (Auto) in Mechanical Division NMP, Panambur Mangalore- 10 on 8-10--1967; that Shri M.K. Mani has completed the Matriculation in the year 1963. He is a holder ofNational Trade Certificate in Motor Mechanic . Thereafter MR . M.K. Mani was promoted as a Mechanic (Auto ) in the Mechanical Division on 5-8-1972 . Subsequently he was againpromoted as a Senior, Mechanic (Auto ) on 8-10-1986 in mechanical Division of NMPT. Thereafter he was designated as Senior Mechanic (Floating Crafts ) in the Mechanical Division under the Asstt. Engineer (Marine) . At the time of designating Mr. M.K. Mani as Senior Mechanic (Floating Crafts ) under the Asst . Engineer (Maine) he was directed to attend to work in Auto sub division and also in Auto/ Crane sub-division .; that in the year 1980 the post of Chargeman (Auto ) in the Mechanical Division was vacant . That Shri M.K Mani has worked in theMechanical division as an Assistant Mechanic (Auto) , Mechanic (Auto ) and as a Senior Mechanic ( Auto ) for 10 years and he was eligible for the post of chargeman (Auto) which has fell vacant in the year 1980. That Mr. M.K. Mani had the qualification and experience to be promoted as Chargeman ( Auto ) in the year 1980 itself. He had made presentationbefore the concerned authorities of NMPT to promote him as a Chargeman (Auto ) . But the representations of Mr. M.K. Mani were not considered by the Second Party/ Management . The Second Party/ Management has ignored the qualification (experience) and Seniority of Mr. M.K. Mani and promoted three other employees who were juniors to Mr. M.K. Mani to the said postofChargeman (Auto ) .; that when Shri M.K. Mani has made repeated representations for promotion, the Second Party management has informed him that they have sent a proposal for approval of the post of Assistant Foreman (Floating Craft) in Mechanical Division to the Government and that his request will be considered at appropriate time . But the Second party Management did not pursue the matter and the post of Assistant Foreman (Floating craft) did not come into existence . On the other hand, the Second Party Management has created other posts in different sections and obtained sanctions from the Government .; that promotion was denied to Mr. M.K. Mani till year 1995 and he was promoted as a Chargerman (Auto ) in the year 1980 itself the same was denied to him till he was promoted to the said post in the year 1995. That the Juniors who promoted as Chargeman (Auto) are placed in the better position in the matter ofpromotion . That other employees appointed as Assistant Mechanics alone with M.K. Mani were even promoted as Junior Engineers (Wharf Crane Sub Division) and getting higher pay scale; that the action ofSecond Party Management in denying promotion toMr. M.K. Mani in the year 1980 to the post of Chargeman (Auto) is illegal and the same would amount to discrimination and unfair labour practice. On account of this Mr. M.K.Mani has suffered monetary loss also .

3. Therefore, the first party requested this tribunal to pass an award to the effect that the action of the management in denying him promotion in the year 1980 to the post of Chargeman (Auto ) is illegal with a direction to the management to promote him to the above said post w.e.f. the year 1980 and to grant consequential benefits including further promotion to the post of Foreman (Floating Craft) in Marine Department along with the cost of the proceedings.

4. The management by its Counter Statement has challenged the claim of the first party workman as follows:-- That Shri M.K. Mani was appointed as Asstt . Mechanic on 9-10-1967 in the Second party Establishment . He was promoted as Mechanic with effect from 5-8-1972 . Again he was promoted as Sr. Mechanic (FC ) with effect from 8-10-1976 . He got his next promotion as Chargeman (Auto ) w.e.f. 15-4-1995 on adhoc basis and is continuing in the same post now; that the post of Chargeman (Auto ) is a promotional post for Senior Mechanic (Auto ) with 3 years regular service in the case of ITI certificate holders subject to passing the Trade test conducted by the Port . A copy of Recruitment Regulations for the post of Chargeman ( Auto ) is enclosed herewith asAnnexure I. It is denied that the post of Chargeman (Auto) was vacant during 1980. It is also denied that Shri Mani was legally entitled for promotion to the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

13103

workman for promotion and not extending the monetary benefits of such promotion made by him are totally baseless and therefore denied; that the firstparty's claim statement is also time barred , as it is not filed within the time prescribed in the order dated 28-7-1998 i.e. 15 day of the receipt of the order of reference . Under Rule 10 ( B ) of the Industrial Disputes ( Central) Rules 1957 and hence liable for rejection.

5. During the course of trial , the management examined two witnesses as MW1 and MW2 and got marked documents at Ex . MI to M7 . The statement of MW1 in his examination chief is as under:--

" I am aware of the facts of the case. First party is now holding Chargeman ( Auto ) on adhoc basis , he ispromoted Chargeman (Auto ) .He was earlier Senior Mechanic . Chargeman (Auto ) is a promotional post. In 1980, the first party was not entitled for promotion as there was no post in the unreserved category. First party belongs to unreserved category. Other senior promoted belonged to SC/ ST category. First party joined as Asstt . Mechanic . He became mechanic on promotion and then promoted as Senior Mechanic . The post Wharf Crane Operator is a direct recruitment post and first party is not entitled for the said post . There is no discrimination and injustice to first party. Ex . M1 is the document showing qualification for promotion for Chargeman (Auto) . Chargeman (Auto) is promotional post on selection. He has to undergo trade test. "

6 The Statement of MW2 in his examination Chief isas follows :-

" I am aware of the facts of the case . Ex. M3 is the OM oftheMinistry. Ex . M4 is the service register. Ex .M5 is the copy of the Service Register. Ex .M6 is also one more service register. Ex . M7 is the schedule of employees. It is true that the management has filed copies of the documents and the counsel for the first party says originals are not filed and they cannot be marked. It is well settled that for our purpose, procedure is different . Our rules provide procedure . Except for limited purpose . CPC is applicable . Therefore , objections over ruled. Apart from this these are departmental circulars and service registers. In the year 1995 the first party was promoted as. Chargeman Auto on adhoc basis under GFR 17 provisions . He was promoted as per rules. "

7. There was no cross examination to MW2 and no oral or documentary evidence was adduced by the first partyworkman in support of the various contentions taken by him in his Claim Statement .

post of Chargeman (Auto ) during the year 1980. The promotions effected by the second party to the post of Chargeman (Auto ) were strictly as per the Recruitinent Regulations prescribed and subject to observance of the Rules prescribed for filling the post reserved for SC/ ST etc. The allegations made in this regard by the first party are baseless and therefore denied; that the management did submit a proposal to the Government seeking its approval for the creation of the post of Assistant Foreman (Floating Crafts) as the powers to create new categories/ additional posts is vested with the Central Govt . and not with the second party. In this case , the Govt . did not approve the proposal submitted by the Second party and rejected it ; that the contentions of the first party are totally incorrect. Shri M.K. Mani secured 3 promotions after his joining the service of the Second Party Port Trust i.e. as Mechanic , as Sr. Mechanic and Chargeman (Auto ). The first party workman has secured 3 promotions already and still has 7 years service before retirement . Where SC/ ST candidates who were junior to the first party were promoted their name find a place above his in the Seniority List ; that the cases of wharf Crane Operators quoted are not relevant to this case . A copy of the Recruitment Regulations for the post of Wharf Crane Operator is enclosed herewith as Annexure - II. it is a direct recruitment post for which certain qualifications , experience etc. are prescribed There was bar to the first party to applying for the post and competed alongwith other candidates ; that the promotion of the first party workman to the post of Chargeman (Auto ) was considered during 19/5 when his turn came as per his seniority for an unreserved post. His case was never overlooked at ar- y stage. The promotion of SC/ ST candidates who were junior to Shri Mani was in accordance with the provisions ofthe Recruitment Regulations and the Government of India instructions on filling up of posts reserved for SC/ ST candidates and there was no vacancy in the unreserved category and hence the question of denial of promotion does not arise . Similarly promotion of SC/ ST candidates against reserved posts as per Roster points cannot be considered as a case of either discrimination or unfair labour practice . There was no denial of any legal right or claim of first party workman and therefore , the alleged suffering on this score is denied ; that the first party's claim statement did not contain any specific case of discrimination in the matter of giving promotion to the post of Chargeman ( Auto) or extending monetary benefits on that account. The statement of the first party in this regard are vogue in nature . The Second Partyconsideredthe case of the first party workman's promotion as per relevant Recruitment Regulations applicable to the respective post . The allegation regarding discrimination on the part of the

8. Learned Counsel for the management submitted that from the statements of MWI & MW2 and the documents produced, it is established that the claim of the first party workman seeking promotion to the post of management of NMPT in not considering first party

3276 G1/05-31 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 13104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4458.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. -1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/231 /95- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] Chargeman (Auto ) w.e.f. the year 1980 is baseless. After having gone through the testimony of MW1 & 2 and the documents on record, I find substance in his argument. Thecase ofthe first party to put in nutshell is that in the year 1980 there was a vacancy for the post of Chargeman (Auto)and hebeing senior mechanic having already put in service of 10 years was very much eligible for the promotion for the post of Chargeman (Auto ) . He had required qualification and experience to be given promotion to the saidpost. It is his case that he was denied the said promotion and above said vacancy was filled by promoting hisjuniors andhewas promoted to the said post only in the year 1995.

सी० गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 7th November, 2005

S.O.4458. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13/97 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court No. 1 New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofUnion Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 02-11-2005

[No. L- 12012/231/95 -IR (B-II) ]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI S.S. BAL

LD . NO . 13/97

In the matter ofdispute between: Shri . M.D. Jerath , Head Cashier S/o Sh . M. G. Jerath, Through General Secretaty, UnionBank of India Workers Congress, Delhi State, 16/375 Joshi Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi .

Workman

Versus

9. Whereas, it is the case of the management that there was no vacancy in the unreserved category of the said post in the year 1980 and that the juniors to him who weregivenpromotion to the said post belonged to reserved category. Therefore , the case of the first party was consideredat appropriate time and he was promoted to the said post in the year 1995. The above said stand taken by the management has been very much substantiated inthe statement ofMW1 and the documents produced on behalf ofthe management. There was nothing worthwhile elicited in his staternent in cross examination on behalf of the first party discrediting his testimony. There was no specific denial ofthe fact in his cross examination that thejuniors whowere promoted to the said post in preference to his claim, in fact, belonged to the reserved category to which category the first party belonged. Moreover, despite the sufficient opportunity given to the first party, he had failed to adduce any evidence on his part much less stepping himself into the witness box . As per the points of reference and the various contentions taken by the first party in his Claim Statement , a heavy burden cast upon him to substantiate his case before this tribunal as to how he was discriminatedby the management in denying him promotion to the said post when it fell vacant in 1980, itself. It was for the first party to lead oral and documentary evidence to substantiate his claim that the post of Chargeman (Auto) which, undisputedly, fell vacant in the year 1980 in fact belonged to unreserved category and that it should have been filled up by promoting a candidate from unreserved category to which he belonged. The first party has failed to discharge the said burden and from his conduct in not adducing evidence despite reasonable opportunity afforded to him would go to suggest that he has not been very much interested in prosecuting the proceedings on hand. Therefore, in the light of the above, this tribunal has no hesitation to come to the conclusion that first party failed to establish his claim and accordingly, the reference is liable to be rejected . Hence the following award.

TheGeneral Manager, Union Bank of India , Zonal Office, NorthShaheed Bagat Singh Place , Bangla Sahib Marg, New Delhi - 110001, ..Management AWARD

APPEARANCES : Ajay Jerath son ofworkman.

The reference is dismissed . No order to cost .

Shri PawanBehl A/R for Management .

AWARD

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 20th October, 2005).

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer 13105

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

PawanBehl Advocate for the management .

vide its Order No. L- 12012/231/95 - IR (B - II) dated 7-1-97 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in stopping 2 annual increment with cumulative effect of Sh . M. D. Jerath, Head Cashier intheyear 1982 and 1983 is legal andjustified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled and from what date?"

6.Mr. Ajay Jerath contended that his father has not committed any misappropriation of money and no loss has been caused to the bank and as such no misconduct as alleged has been committed by him. On the contrary Mr. Behl Advocate A/R of the management contended that, the alleged charges against the erring officer/charge- sheeted employee have been proved and he has been aptly held guilty by the enquiry officer and which order was duly confirmed in appeal and the same does not suffer from any illegality and he has been given leniency in matter ofpunishment also. He deserved more severe punishment for commission of offence of misconduct involving misappropriation of the public amount, amount of the depositor client of the bank.

2. Brief facts which has given rise to the above reference are that one Mr. M.D. Jerath was appointed as Cashier with the respondent and was posted at Kailash Colony branch of the Management Bank and on 8th December, 1977 one Mr. Laxman Wader gave him for depositing in the bank Rs . 201.50p which he did not deposit and misappropriated and said amount of Rs . 201.50р. Complaint was received from the complainant Laxman Wader depositor against the cashier for not depositing the money and on the basis of this complaint an enquiry was ordered and Mr. Jerath cashier was charged for having not deposited the said amount with the respondent/ management and misappropriated the same . The enquiry was conducted and Enquiry Officer Mr. Gursharn Singh Superintendent conducted the enquiry and he submitted the report the confirming the charges against delinquent officer M.D. Jerath. The Disciplinary Authority Youraj Karan, Deputy General Manager vide his order dated 14-7-81 accepted the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer and awarded punishment of stoppage of successive/next two annual increments with cumulative effect . Delinquent officer challenged the same in appeal but without any success and the order dated 14-7-81 of the disciplinary authority was confirmed. Even the appeal for mercy was dismissed. Then the delinquent official the government and raised dispute resulting in the present reference requiring adjudication.

7. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the contention raised by both sides and gone through the record and perused the evidence / testimony of the witnesses . The management examined as many as nine witnesses namely S/ Shri R.K. Srivastava, R. C. Banga, S.K. Kataria, Arvind Shah , R.K.Jain , Daya Ram Jain , F.M. Uniwola, B.K. Gosain , P.K. Gupta have been produced but the complaint Laxman Wader depositor has not been produced and examined . Perusal of the evidence of the witnesses goes to show that finding of the enquiry officer vide orderdt . 14-7-81 that the charges against the charge- sheeted employee have not been proved conclusively upheld in appeal vide order dt. 18-9-81 does not suffer from any illegality but both the orders passed by disciplinary authority 14-7-81 and the appellate authority dt . 18-9-81 in the matter of inflecting punishment of stoppage of two successive increment of the erring officer claimant is not sustainable in the eye of law for, there is no evidence of record that the claimant a committed any negligence not he was charged for the commission of the negligence nor he was given an opportunity to defined himself for this charge. Hence the order of the disciplinary authoritydt. 14-7-81 inflecting the stoppage of two successive increments of the claimant and the order of the appellate authoritydt. 18-9-81 confirming the said punishment deserve to be set aside.

3.After receipt of reference notice to the parties were issued. Then parties appeared and statement of claim, written statement, replication were filed . Thereafter after recording of evidence of parties the matter was ultimately fixed for arguments .

8. In view of the above discussion the order passed by the disciplinary authority holding the chargesheeted employee guilty of the charges of negligence and appellate order confirming the said order are accordingly set aside and the chargesheeted employee is entitled to the arrears ofincrements etc. with held illegally. It is ordered that said arrears of the increments be paid to the L. Rs of the workman withinone month of the publication of award of award.

Date: 24-10-2005

S. S. BAL, Presiding Officer 4.Duringthe pendence of the proceedings Shri Jerath died on 21st ofMarch, 2003 when the case was a fixed for arguments . Shri Ajay Jerath son of the workman moved an application for impleadment of legal heirs of the workman onrecord which was allowed vide order dated 21-1-2004 and Smt. Santosh Jerath, wife, Sanjeev Jerath, Arun Jerath and Ajay Jerath sons were impleaded as L. Rs and brought on record. All the legal heirs authorised Ajay Jerath son to appearand conduct the case on their behalf. Both the parties accepted the evidence already recorded and pressed for argument.

5. I have heard Shri Ajay Jerath in person and Shri 13106

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर, 2005

This reference was made by the Ministry of Labour, Government of India as per Order No. L- 12011 /200 / 2000 - IR (B.II ) dated 6-8-2001 to adjudicate the justifiability of the action of the management of Canara Bank in terminating the service of one of its New Nityanidhi Deposit Agents by name Sri I.L. Chacko and to consider the further reliefs liable to be granted.

का.आ. 4459.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय कोजीकोड के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[से. एल-12011/200/2000- आईआर थी- II ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिय

New Delhi , the 7th November , 2005

S.O. 4459.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2001 ) of the Labour Court, Kozhikode as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 02-11-2005.

[No. L-12011 /200/2000 - IR (B - Ⅱ ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

2. The case of the worker as espoused by the Union is that. The worker was employed as Nityanidhi Deposit canvassing agent in the Parippu branch of the Management-Bank from 1-1-1977 . While so, he was denied employment on 28-8-1998 without any reason or justification. Thereafter the agency of the worker was terminated as per a notice w.e. f. 19-12-1998 on the charge that he had violated clause 7 of the bipartite agreement in not honestly and deligently discharging his duties in acoordance with the rules of business. This was done without hearing him or conducting any enquiry. The charges are misconceived and baseless . The action of the management in the matter of termination of service is ill- motivated , illegal , arbitrary and opposed to public policy. So the Union prays to set aside the order of termination and reinstate the worker in service with backwages and continuity in service .

IN THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE , KERALA STATE

Dated this the 29th day of September, 2005

PRESENT :

Shri K. BALASUBRAMANIAN, B. Com. , L.LEs Presiding Officer

L.D. (C) No. 3/01

BETWEEN

The Deputy General Manager, Canara Bank, Circle Office, Trivandrum- 39 .

-Managemen

AND

The General Secretary, AllKerala Bank'sDeposit Collectors' Association, A.V.G. Memorial Hall, Cherootty Road, Calicut-673 032 .

-Uamon

REPRESENTATIONS :

Sri P.M. Padmanabhan, Advocate , Calicut

-For Management

Sri P.S. Murali , Advocate , Calicut

-For Union

Accordingto the management the worker was never employed by them. The agents are not governed by the Canara Bank Service Code or terms of Bipartite Settlement as applicable to the regular employees of the Bank . Their rights , duties and obligations are governed by contractual conditions. Though deposit collectors have been bestowed with the status of workers on the basis of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court , they are not regular employees of the Bank . Their rights , duties and obligations are governed by contractual conditions . The ruling of Apex Court has also no restrospective operation and as such reference is bad. As per the agreement conditions NNND agent Sri Chacko was required to remit the collection of the day on the very next working day. He defaulted in remitting, the dailycollection in time . There were also several complaints of irregularities and mis - appropriation of funds from NNND depositors against Chacko . The Bank had also received five specific complaints from customers stating that Chacko had not accounted certain amounts received from them and misappropriated the money. An internal investigzion conducted revealed that the complaints were true . But by the time Chacko reimbursed the amounts to the depositors. It was also brought out in investigation that Chacko had not remitted the previous day's collection at the commencement of business on the next day and that he used to collect cash without issuing proper receipts . His average daily collection also went below the minimum target . In the light ofthe findings of the Investigation Officer and considering all the aspects of the matter , management 13107

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

decided to terminate the agency of Chacko . The action of the management is not ill - motivated or tained in any way. NNND agent cannot be allowed to rend the fabric oftrust which constituted the vary foundation of the Bank. Since Chacko failed to live up to the confidence reposed in him, the Bank was forced to take steps which resulted in his termination. The worker has no right to claim absorption in service.

basis ofcertain complaints of customers and on the charge that the worker failed in properly accounting and rather honestly and dilingently disckage his duties in accordance with the rules of business of the Bank . The action was taken invoking clause 7 of the Ext. M8 service agreement . The compliaints were investigated by a senior Manager of the Bank who was examined as MW 1. The Investigating Officer found out several irregularities in not regularly and properly accounting and depositing previous day's collection in time and collection of funds without proper vouchers . He also found out some discrepancies in the related accounts .Accordingly Ext. M1 report investigation report was filed that resulted in the termination of service ofthe worker as per Ext . W1 order.

4. Reiterating the employer -employee relationship attacking the legality and propriety of the action of the management, supporting the maintainability of reference and canvassing that the order of termination is vitiated on account of victimisation, the worker has filed a detailed rejoinder. Thereafter management filed an additional statement contending that the worker is governed only by the Contract Labour Abolition Act and not by the Industrial Disputes Act and therefore the dispute is not maintainable . This was challenged by the management by filing an additional statement.

5. The evidence consists of oral evidence of MW1 and Exts.M1 to M 12 (a) on the management side and the oral evidence of WW1 and Exts . W1 to W5 marked on the workers side.

6. On the basis of the rival pleadings and evidence the following points arise for determination:-

(1) Is the reference incompetent as contended ?

(2) Whether the worker involved in the dispute is aworkman of the management as envisaged u/s . 2(s) of I.D. Act ?

11. MW1 deposed about the details of investigation conducted and materials collected in the course of investigation . The witness also stated about some instances of failure in remitting previous day's collection atthe commencement of business on the next day and that the worker had not scrupulously followed and rather violated the norms on several occasions . MW2 , another officer who was working in the branch during the disputed period also gave evidence in tune with that of MW1 . The witness particularly referred about Ext . M 12 (a) entry in Ext. M 12 shroff cash book to substantiate the delay in making the remittance by the worker. According to MW2 , the previous day's collection had to be remitted by 10O'clock on the next working day as first remittances . As against their evidence the worker when examined as MWI denied the charges and according to him the accusations were falsely made at the instance of two officers who were onenemical terms with him.

(3) Whether the termination of services of the worker is illegal or unjust ? If so, further reliefs liable to be granted ?

7. Point No. 1 :-The contention is that the Government having declined to make the reference on an earlier occasion and subsequently referred the vary same issue for adjudication on the basis of a subsequent decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court which has no retrospective operation, the reference is bad.

8. This issue was considered as a preliminary point on the request of the management and it was found that the reference is competent.

9. Point No. 2: The worker was working as NNND agent for one of the savings schemes sponsored by the Bank. In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2001 ( 1 ) LLJ 1045 that the deposit agents are liable to be considered as workmen of the management comingwith in the purview of I D Act , this issue does not survive for reconsideration .

12. Exts . M2 to M5 are the photostate copies of the so-called complaints of customers about the mis-conduct ofthe worker . Those documents were admitted in evidence subject to the production of originals and proper proof. But neither the originals were produced nor the authors of the complaints were examined or their statements recorded. There is nothing to show that the investigation was conducted either in the presence of worker or after getting his explanation. MW 1 admitted in evidence that the worker was not served with any show cause notice before terminating the service . The witness further admitted that he had not verified the counter file receipts issued to the customers with reference to the originals available with the Bank and the sole basis of the conclusions is the so-called solitary statements of customers which do not come to light . Ext. M8 does not insist remittance ofprevious day's collection as first remittance , perhaps such a practice might have been followed in the Bank as seen from Ext . M6( a) and (c) to check any possible mischief. There is no acceptable and cogent evidence to substantiate that the worker has committed any malpractice or did not discharged his duties honestly or diligently. So I hold that the action ofthe management in terminating the service of the worker 10. Point No. 3 :-The impugned action was taken against the worker by the management based on our internal investigation report initiated purportedly on the

3276 G1/05-33 13108

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1927

asNNND agent is arbitrary, unjustified and unsustainable inlaw.

13. Clause 9 of Ext . M8 is the relevant clause regarding termination of agency. Clause 10 ( a) enumerates the contingencies under which the service of the agent is liable tobe terminated and clause (b) gives an unfettered authority to the management to terminate the agency without assigning any reasons . This unfettered power of the management which has a sense of arbitrariness may not have any legal sanction . Though MW2 , the representative of Bank stated that the bank is gradually abolishing the post of NNND agents , there is no satisfactory evidence to show that the said post has been abolished . In the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2001-1 - LLJ 1045, there is no question of absorption and payment of same pay scale allowances and other service conditions of the regular employees of the bank . The Bank in their statement has pleaded loss of confidence in the worker who was engaged in a post involving mutual confidence and trust at the same time the fact that the worker had a service of more than two decades with the Bank cannot also be forgotten . There is also no evidence ofgainful alternate employment ofworker. Having regard to the various factors and circumstances discussed I hold that it may not be appropriate to reinstate the worker in service whereas interest of justice could be adequately metby awarding compensation in lieu of reinstatement .

14. In the result , an award is passed setting aside the order ofmanagement terminating the service of worker as NNND agent. Management is directed to pay Rs . 40,000 ascompensation in lieu of reinstatement within one month of pronouncement of award, lest the amount will carry interest at 6% per annum.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, revised, corrected and passed by me on the 29th day of September , 2005.

K. BALASUBRAMANIAN, Presiding Officer

APPENDIX

Witnesses examined from the side of the Union:-

WW1 : I.L. Chacko .

Witnesses examined from the side of the Management : - MW1 :

VN.M. Namboodhiri .

MW2:

T Pious

Exhibits marked from the side of the Union:-

Ext. WI: Letter issued to the worker by the Manager of CanaraBank, Parippu dated 19-12-1998.

Ext. W2: Letter dated 9-11-1998 sent by worker to Regional Manager , Canara Bank .

Ext. W3: Copy of the High Court order dated 16-12-1998 in O. P. 25049/98 F.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Ext. W4: Copy of letter dated 13-2-1999 sent by worker to Regional Manager, Canara Bank.

Ext. W5: Letter dated 4-3-1999 issued by Asst . General Manager Canara Bank to worker.

Exhibits marked from the side of the Management:-

Ext. MI: Investigation Report submitted by V.N. V. Namboodiri , Senior Manager, Canara Bank , Cochin in connection with the complaint against the worker , I. L. Chacko .

Ext. M2: True copy of complaint of Manager, Parippu Branch dated 20-7-1998 along with the complaint of Mary John (Ponnamma John).

Ext.M3: True copy of complaint of Manager , ParippuBranch 17-8-1998 along with NNND A/ c of Ponnamma John.

Ext.M4: True copy of complaint of Shylaprasad .

Ext.M5: -do- Aleyamma Varghese.

Ext.M6: Letter of I.L. Chacko the worker , to the Manager, Canara Bank.

Ext . M6 ( a) : -do-

Ext. M6 (b ) : -do-

Ext. M6 (c) : -do-

-do- Ext. M6 ( d):

Ext. M7 : Statement given by I.L. Chacko the worker, before the V.N.V. Namboodiri , Investigation Officer, Canara Bank dt.8-9-1998 .

Ext.M8: Agreementdt. 10-6-1996 between I.L , Chacko and Canara Bank.

Ext. M9 : Letter dt. 19-12-1998 sent by Manager, CanaraBank, Parippu Branch to the worker.

Ext. M10 : Creditslip (NNND) dt.30-6-1998 for Rs.760 ofCanara Bank

Ext. M10 (a) : -do- Rs.700. -do-

Ext.MI I : NNND slips of Canara Bank , Parippu Branch dt. 30-6-1998 .

Ext. M12: Shroff cash Book of Canara Bank since 15-10-1997.

Ext. M12 ( a) : -do- Page No. 423 and424.

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4460.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स एसोसिएशन ऑफ शिपिंग इन्टेरेस्ट इन कलकत्ता के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, कोलकाता 13109

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 21/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -32012/3/2004- आईआर ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

transport reimbursements , Washing charge reimbursement and F.D.A. etc. as per WRC settlement-National Wage Agreement dated 2-8- 2000 w.e.f. 1-1-1997 and that the bipartite settlement dated 12-8-2002 is detrimental to the interest ofthe watchmen are entitled? If not, to what relief the watchmen are entitled to?"

New Delhi, the 7th November, 2005

S.O. 4460. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 21/2005) of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Kolkata as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the Management ofM/s . Association of Shipping Interest in Calcutta and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 02-11-2005.

2. When the case is called out today, representative of the management appears, but none appears for the workmen, nor any step is taken on their behalf to proceed with the present reference. Representative of the management states that no step has been taken on behalf ofthe workmen in the present case and therefore it is clear that the workmen are not at all interested in the matter . He accordingly prays that an appropriate order may be passed for disposal of the present reference.

[No. L- 32012/3/2004- IR (B- II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 21 of2005

3. From aperusal of the record of the case it appears that no step has ever been taken on behalf of the workmen toproceedwith the matter in question. It is therefore clear that the workmen are no longer interested in the present dispute. In such view of the matter, this Tribunal has no other alternative but to dispose of the present reference by passing a "No Dispute" Award.

PARTIES:

4. A"No Dispute " Award is accordingly passed and the present reference is disposed of.

Dated, Kolkata, the 25th October, 2005.

Employers in relation to the management of M/s.Association of Shipping Interest in Calcutta AND Their Workmen

HRISHIKESH BANERJI, Presiding Officer PRESENT:

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्भर, 2005 Mr. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH BANERJEE, Presiding Officer

APPEARANCE :

Onbehalf of Management : Mr. R. C. Jain, Secretary, Association of Shipping Interest in Calcutta.

None

Onbehalf of Workmen :

State: West Bengal .

का.आ. 4461.-औद्योगिक विन्द अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सफदरजंग अस्पताल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 63/2004 को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Industry: Shipping

Dated: 25th October, 2005

[सं. एल-42012/47/2004-आईआर ( सी- II ) ] AWARD

५२. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 11th November , 2005 By Order No. L- 32012/ 3 / 2004 - IR (B - II ) dated 06-5-2005 the Central Government in exercise of its powers conferredunder Section 10 (1 )( d) and (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

S.O. 4461. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 4/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Safdarjung Hospital and their workman , "Whether the claim of Watchmen of Calcutta Port Watchmen Pool (Managedby M/s . Association of Shipping Interest in Calcutta, Shipping House, 13 , Strand Road, Kolkata-700001 ) for revised/enhanced allowance like House rent, port city allowance, [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 13110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

संख्या 4/2005 को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को which was received by the Central Government on 11-11-2005.

11-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[No. L -42012/47/2004- IR(C- II)]

[सं. एल -42012/63/2004- आईआर ( सी- II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer .

एन. पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी ANNEXURE

New Delhi , the 11th November , 2005 BEFORE SHRI SANT SINGH BAL : PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. I : NEW DELHI

L.D. No. 63/2004

In the matter ofdispute between:

Shri Arjun Singh S/o Late Sh . Hari Chand ,

Ex-StretcherBearer

S.O. 4462. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 4/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Safdarjung Hospital and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-11-2005.

[No. L-42012/63/2004- IR (C- II ) ]

Workman

R/o K-200, J. J. Colony, Shakur Pur, NewDelhi.

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer Versus

ANNEXURE

The Medical Superintendent , Safadarjung Hospital ,

NewDelhi - 110029 .

Management

BEFORE SHRI SANT SINGH BAL : PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 : NEW DELHI None for the workman

APPEARANCES :

L.D. No. 4/2005

AWARD

Inthe matter of dispute between :

Shri Arjun Singh S/o Late Sh. Hari Chand,

Stretcher Bearer

R.No. 4086 r/o K-300 , J.J. Colony,

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.L - 42012/47/2004 ( IR ( CM - II ) dated 15-12-2004 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Workman

Shakur Pur, Delhi .

Versus

TheMedical Superintendent , Safadarjung Hospital ,

NewDelhi - 110029 .

Management "Whether the action of Medical Supdt. Safadarjung Hospital , New Delhi in terminating the services of Shri Arjun Das S/o Late Hari Chand , Ex - Stretcher Bearerw.e.f. 9-6-2001 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?"

None for the workman

APPEARANCES :

Shri H.S. Rawat for the management .

AWARD

2. It appears that this industrial dispute pertains to the same workman . There is only some difference in the name of the workman in I. D. No. 63/2004 and I.D.No. 4/2005 and workman is not taking interest in prosecution of this case and there appears to be no dispute between the parties . As such No dispute award is passed . File be consigned to record room.

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.L -42012/ 63 /2004 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 30-12-2004 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication: - Dated: 26-10-05

S. S. BAL, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर, 2005

" Whether the action of the Medical Supdt . Safadarjung Hospital , New Delhi in terminating the services of Shri Arjun Singh, S /o Late Hari Chand Stretcher Bearer R.No. 4086 w.e.f. 9-6-2001 is legal and justified ? If not to what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date ?"

का.आ. 4462.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सफदर जंग अस्पताल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ

2. Perusal of the record shows that the workman has not been appearing in this case since 3-3-2005 . However, he appeared in response to the notice served on him 13111

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its order No.L-42012/ 229/2003 - IR (CM - II) Central Government dt . 3-11-2004 has referred the following point for adjudication:-

personally through Court clerk on 22-8-05. Thereafter he did not appear today i.e. on 26-10-2005. It appears that he has not taking interest in the prosecution of the case .Hance No dispute award is passed. File be consigned to record room.

The point runs as hereunder :--

S.S. BAL, Presiding Officer

Dated: 26-10-05

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4463.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी० पी० डब्ल्यू०डी० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार ओद्यौगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 163/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/ 229/2003- आईआर ( सी- II ) ]

"Whether the demand of the CPWD Karamchari Union (Regd . ) for absorption/regularization of the services of Shri Rajender S/o . Shri Omi and Mrs. Pushpa W/o . Shri Krishan Lal , "T" Division, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief are the workmen entitled and from which date. It transpires from perusal of the order sheet that notice to the President , All India CPWD Karamchari union was sent on 06-12-2004 directing him to appear on 16-2-05 but the President , All India CPWD Karamchari Union has not turned up. The management has been present all along . The President on behalf of the workman applicant has not filed claim statement despite service of notice.

एन० पी० केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

No dispute award is given .

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer New Delhi , the 11th November , 2005

Date: 08-11-2005

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर, 2005 S.O. 4463. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 163/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court NewDelhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management C.P.W.D. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-11-2005.

[No. L-42012/229/2003 - IR(C- II) ]

का.आ. 4464.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पी० जी० आई ० एम ० ई० आर० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 114/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को11-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

[सं. एल-42012/158/2004- आईआर ( सी- II ) ] एन० पी० केशवनं, डेस्क अधिकारी ANNEXURE

New Delhi , the 11th November , 2005 BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT- II NEW DELHI

L.D. NO . 163/2004

PRESIDINGOFFICER : R.N.RAI .

S.O. 4464. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 114/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of PGIMER and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-11-2005.

IN THE MATTER OF :

The President ,

[No. L-42012/ 158/2004 -IR(C- II)] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE All India CPWD Karamchari Union, PlotNo. 1, Udaseen Mandir, Aram Bagh, Paharganj, New Delhi - 110055 .

Versus

CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II H.NO. 1228, SECTOR, 24 -B , CHANDIGARH.

SHRI KULDIP SINGH

PRESIDING OFFICER:

Case No. 114/ 2k5

Registered on: 19-7-2005

TheExecutive Engineer, T- Division, Central Public Works Department , Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi .

13112

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1927

Date of Decision 5-10-2005

Smt. Rama Davi , A- 223 / 1 , Sector. 14, Chandigarh

... Petitioner

V/s

TheDirector, PGIMER, Sector. 12, Chandigarh, M/s.Om Security& Cleaning Services (Regd) , PGIMER Sector . 12, Chandigarh.

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of S.C.C.L. and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 11-11-2005 .

[No. L -220 13/ 1 /2005 - IR (C- II ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Respondent

APPEARANCE :

Forthe Workman

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Assem Rai

For theManagement .

AWARD

Management appears through counsel . Workman ispresent.

The workman states that she has got alternative employment, therefore , she is not interested to seek relief through the present reference . Rather she withdraws her claim as made out by her in her petition which has resulted into the making ofthe present reference . This way she has refused to produce any evidence to prove that the Management of PGI Chandigarh and M/S Om Security and Cleaning Services , illegally and without any justification, terminated her services . The workman, despite notices has not filed even her statement of claim. Thus this Tribunal has no evidence to hold that the order of termination of services of Smt. Rama Devi, the workman, was illegal and without any justification . As such the reference is answered in the terms that the termination of services ofthe workman was justified and legal . Let a copy ofthis Award be sent to the appropriate Government for necessary action under Rule and the file be consigned to records after due completion.

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4465.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस ० सी० सी ०एल ० के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकारण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-11-2005 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/ 1/ 2005- आईआर ( सी- II ) ] एन० पी० केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th November , 2005 S.O. 4465- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Shri T. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, Presiding Officer Dated the 25th October, 2005

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. NO . 11/2004 Between:

U. Venkateshwarlu, S/o Yellaiah,

...Petitioner R/o 17-1-169 , 7 Number Basthy, Ramavaram (Post ) , Khammam District.

AND

TheGeneral Manager,

M/sSingareni Collieries Company Ltd. ,

Kothagudem Area,

...Respondents Kothagudem, Khammam District .

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : V. Raghu , Advocate

K. SrinivasaMurthy, For the Respondent :

Advocate.

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 in view of thejudgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri . U. Chinnappa and M/s. Cotton Corporation of India and two others.

2. The brief averments made in the petition are that he was appointed as General Mazdoor in September 1990 at Ramgundam - II and thereafter transferred to Kothagudem in June 1998 as General Mazdoor and posted to work at 5th Incline . He was a prompt worker but he could not attend his duties regularly at Kothagudem due to change of weather and environment and falling sick . His attendance decreased gradually and registered only 160 musters in 1998, 110 musters in 1999 , 53 musters in the year 2000. He was charge sheeted for his absenteeism and enquiry was held. He could not give his evidence in the enquiry and acted as per the instructions of his officer. The respondent management without considering the explanation, initiated enquiry and erroneously concluded that he was guilty of the charge and issued dismissal order dated 24-12-2001 . The punishment is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the charge . He approached the General Manager , Kothagudem Area after dismissal notice for his 13113

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2005/अग्रहायण 5 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

reinstatement but no avail . He has got 3 minor children and wife are dependents on his income and requested to reinstate with all consequential benefits .

7. It is not in dispute that the Enquiry Officer has served the charge sheet against the petitioner and during the enquiry, when the petitioner was questioned about the charges he admitted the charges levelled against him. In spite of the admission, the Enquiry Officer has examined the witnesses Uday Bhaskar and P. V. Sheshagiri Rao . The witnesses have stated that the petitioner has put only 53 musters and absented himself for 253 days during the year 2000 and also filed the records to that affect. The petitioner, himself has admitted that he remained absent without sanctioned leave or sick and did not avail any leave .

8. The Enquiry Officer has given his reasons regarding his conclusions holding that the charge against the petitioner is proved. The disciplinary Authority has given showcause notice dismissing him from service. The appeal preferred by the petitioner was also rejected.

9. On considering the material on record, it is found that the Enquiry Officer has followed the procedure as required under standing orders and the petitioner was given ample opportunity to defend himself and further the petitioner admitted the charges and the Enquiry Officer recorded his reasons with regard his conclusions . I do not see any ground to interfere with the enquiry report .

3. The respondent filed the counter and denied the averments made in the petition and pleaded that the appropriate Government of the respondent is Central Government and the proper procedure to entertain the dispute is only after Failure of the Conciliaton Proceedings and referring the matter by way of reference by the Government . It is further, submitted that the petitioner was unauthorisedly absent and that he was dismissed after holding due enquiry and given an ample opportunity during the enquiry to cross examine the witness and to adduce his evidence. The petitioner was given charge sheet dated 13-2-2000 under clause 25(25) AND 25 (31 ) OF Company's StandingOrders for unauthorized absenteeism during the year 2000 and in fact, the petitioner put musters during preceding 3 years of his dismissal are as follows: - 1988-135 days, 1999-131 days, 2000-55 days and 2001-83 days upto October 2001. It is further denied that the petitioner has a sole brrad winner of his family and the punishment is disproportionate to the gravity of the charges and further pleaded that the petitioner has admitted that the charge against his unauthorized absenteeism. Even after his admission , the enquiry was conducted observing the principles of naturaljustice.

4. This tribunal has held on 29-12-2004 about the validity of domestic enquiry. It was held that the enquiry was duly held and the petitioner was given full and fair opportunityto defend himself and the Enquiry Officer has given reasons for his conclusions.

10. It has to be seen whether the punishment imposed on the petitioner is disproportionate to the gravity ofthe charge. The conduct on the part of the petitioner is that he has put in only 55 musters in the year 2000 and prior to that also he has not put up the required musters in a year. In view of the fact, that the petitioner has absented himself from duty without leave on several occasions , he does not deserve any sympathy or interference by this Tribunal . Further in view of the said ruling 1996( 1 ) SCC 302 which was held that the punishment imposed is not disproportionate to the gravity of the charges . 1 do not see any sufficient ground to interference with the order of the dismissal .

5. The arguments under section 11 A of ID Act were held onboth sides . The Learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the respondent without considering the explanation by the petitioner initiated enquiry and further the punishment imposed is disproportionate to the gravity of the charge.

11. For the above reasons , an award is passed accordingly dismissing the application.

Dictated to Shri P. Kanaka Raju , LDC transcribed by him, correctedby me and given under my hand and seal of this Court on this the 25th day ofOctober, 2005.

T. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

No oral or documentary evidence adduced on either side .

6. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel for the respondent contended that the petitioner was habitual absentee and an enquiry was initiated for absenting 253 days in the year 2000 and after due enquiry, it was found that the petitioner was guilty of the charge and the Disciplinary Authority after giving ample opportunity, has dismissed him from service and relied upon the Apex Court Judgement 1996 (1 ) SCC page 302 and contended that the punishment is proportionate with the gravity of the charges.

Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press, Ring Road, and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.