This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/ 0007 / 2003-05

REGD . NO . D. L. ( N ) 04/ 0007 /2003-05 भारत सत्यमेव जयते राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली, जनवरी 15 जनवरी 21 , 2006 , शनिवार/पौष 25- माघ 1 , 1927 NEW DELHI , JANUARY 15 JANUARY 21 , 2006, SATURDAY/PAUSA 25- MAGHA 1, 1927

सं० 31 No. 3]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड - उप- खण्ड (ii) PART II- Section 3 Sub- section ( ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

सामाजिक न्याय और अधिकारिता मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2006 का. आ. 211.-नियुक्ति अवधि की समाप्ति पर, श्रीमती अलोक गुहा को 31 दिसम्बर, 2005 के अपराह्न से ऑटिज्म, प्रमस्तिष्क अंगघात, मानसिक मंदता और बहु विकलांगता ग्रस्त व्यक्तियों के कल्याणार्थ राष्ट्रीय न्याय के अध्यक्ष के पद से कार्यमुक्त किया जाता है ।

[सं. 5-2/2004-एन. आई . II ] सर्वेश राय, उप सचिव MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT

New Delhi , the 2nd January , 2006 S.O. 211. On expiry of her term of appointment, Smt . Aloka Guha is hereby relieved of her duties of the post of Chairperson in the National Trust for Welfare of persons with Autism , Cerebral Palsy , Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities with effect from the afternoon of the 31st December , 2005 .

[No. 5-2/ 2004 -NI . I SARVESH RAI , Dy. Secy 55GI/ 2006

वित्त मंत्रालय

(आर्थिक कार्य विभाग )

(बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 212.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) योजना, 1970 के खंड 3 के उप- खंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 कीउप - धारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा , श्री एच. एन. प्रसाद, प्रधान मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, प्रशासन एवं कार्मिक प्रबंधन विभाग , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, केन्द्रीय कार्यालय , मुम्बई को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगला आदेश होने तक, श्री जी. के. शर्मा के स्थान पर बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा के निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/ 18/2000- बीओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , अवर सचिव

(485) 486

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Economic Affairs )

(BANKING DIVISION)

New Delhi , the 12th January , 2006

उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (क) ' के अधीन मनोनीत " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 25 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी , अर्थात्ः-

" 25. डा. रविकान्त , राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र दिल्ली सरकार " प्रोफेसर, शल्यं चिकित्सा ( सर्जरी ) , मौलाना आजाद मेडिकल कालेज,

नईदिल्ली -110002

[ सं. वी-11013 / 1 / 2005 - एम.ई. ( नीती -1 ) ]

के. वी. एस. राव , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health )

S.O. 212.- In exercise of the powers conferredby clause ( c) of Sub -section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970 , read with Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Nationalised Baaks ( Management and Miscellancous Provisions) Scheme , 170 the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri li . A. Prasad , Principal Chief General Manager , Department of Administration and Personnel Management, Reserve Bank of India , Central Office , Mumbai as Director on the Board of Bank of Baroda vice Shri G.K. Sharma , with immediate effect and until further orders.

New Delhi , the 14th November, 2005 [F. No. 9 /18//2000-B.O. -I] G. B. SINGH , Under Secy.

(कार्यालय आयुक्त, केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क )

भोपाल, 5 जनवरी , 2006

S.O. 214. Whereas the Central Government , in pursuance of clause (a) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) and in consultation with the Government of NCT of Delhi have nominated Dr. Ravi Kant , to be a member of the mdical council of India for a period of five years with effect from the date of issue of this notification .

का.आ. 213.-श्री सी. एस . तिवारी , अधीक्षक, समूह ' ख', केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क, आयुक्तालय भोपाल, निवर्तन की आयु प्राप्त करने पर, दिनाँक 30-11-2005 को अपराह्न में शासकीय सेवा से निवृत्त हुये ।

[सी.सं. II ( 25 ) 01 /2000/स्था. 1 ]

Now , therefore , in pursuance of the provision of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health Number S.O. 138 , dated the 9th January, 1960 , namely ;

बी. डी. बोरकर , संयुक्त आयुक्त ( का. /स. ) (OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE )

New Delhi , the 5th January , 2006

In the said notification , under the heading , 'Nominated under clause ( a) of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ' , for serial number 25 and the entries there to , the following serial number and entrics shall be substituted, namely :

Govt . of NCT of Delhi "

" 25. Dr. Ravi Kant ,

Professor of Surgery ,

Maulana Azad Medical College,

S.O. 213. Shri C.S. Tiwari , Superintendent , Group B Central Excise & Customs , Bhopal Commissionerate having attained the age of superannuation , retired from Government Service in the afternoon of 30th November , 2005 .

New Delhi - 110002

[C.No. 11 ( 25 ) 01 /2000/E1-1 ]

[ No. V- 11013 /1 /2005 - ME (Policy-I) ] B.D. BORKAR, Jt . Commissioner (P &V )

K.V. S. RAO , Under Secy .

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम्बर , 2005

(स्वास्थ्यविभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 215.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में डा. टी.आर. बरबोरा , प्राचार्य , असम मेडिकल कालेज, डिब्रूगढ़ को डिब्रूगढ़ विश्वविद्यालय की सीनेट द्वारा इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया है ।

का.आ. 214.- केन्द्र सरकार ने भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क) के अनुसरण में तथा राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र दिल्ली सरकार के परामर्श से डा. रत्रिकान्त को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से पांच वर्ष की अवधि के लिए भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद के एक सदस्यके रूप में मनोनीत किया है ।

अतः , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्यमंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्ः

उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अधीन निर्वाचित " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 35 और उससे अतः , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्ः [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी , अर्थात्: -

डिब्रूगढ़ विश्वविद्यालय " " 35. डॉ. टी. आर. बरबोरा, प्राचार्य, असम मेडिकल कालेज, डिब्रूगढ़ ।

[सं. वी. 11013/2/2004- एमई ( नीति -1 ) ] के. वी. एस. राव , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th December , 2005 S.O. 215. Whereas in pursuance of clause (b) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956( 102 of 1956) Dr. T. R. Barbora, Principal, Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh has been elected by the Senate ofthe Dibrugarh University to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the date of issue of this notification .

Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby makes the following futher amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 138 , dated the 9th January, 1960, namely;

In the said notification , under the heading , ' Elected under clause (b ) of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ' , for serial number 35 and the entries there to , the following serial number and entries shall be substituted, namely:-

Dibrugarh University" 35. Dr. T. R.Barbora , Principal, Assam Medical College , Dibrugrah.

[No. V- 11013/2/2004-ME (Policy - I ) ] K.V. S. RAO, Under Secy .

रसायन और उर्वरक मंत्रालय (रसायन एवं पेट्रोरसायन विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2006

का.आ. 216.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम (4) के अनुसरण में रसायन और उर्वरक मंत्रालय , रसायन और पेट्रोरसायन विभाग के नियंत्रणाधीन "क " क्षेत्र में स्थित निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है: -

इंस्टीटयूट आफ पेस्टिसाइड फार्मूलेशन टेक्नोलॉजी ( आई पी एफ टी ) सेक्टर 20 , उद्योग विहार , गुड़गांव-122 016 ( हरियाणा )

[सं. ई -11019/5/2003- हिन्दी] अशोक कुमार सचदेव, संयुक्त निदेशक ( राजभाषा )

487

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS (Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals) New Delhi , the 9th January , 2006

S.O. 216. In pursuance of Sub -rule (4 ) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 , the Central Government hereby notify the following office in region ' A ' under the administrative control of Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers , Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals , the 80% staff whereof have acquired the workman knowledge ofHindi:-

National Institute of Pesticide Formulation Technology (IPFT) Sector 20 , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon - 122016 (Haryana)

[No. E - 11019/5/2003- Hindi ] A.K. SACHDEV, Jt . Director ( OL) विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग) नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2006

का.आ. 217.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप - नियम (4) के अनुसरण में विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय, के प्रशानिक नियंत्रणाधीन भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीयों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है:-

1. उत्तरांचल भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग, देहरादून।

2. व्यवसाय एवं प्रचार निदेशालय , भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग देहरादून।

3. उत्तरी मुद्रण वर्ग , भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग देहरादून । 4. उत्तर प्रदेश भू- स्थानीय आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग लखनऊ ।

5. राष्ट्रीय स्थानीय आंकड़ा आधारित संरचना , भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग , नई दिल्ली ।

6. राजस्थान भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग जयपुर ।

7. मध्य प्रदेश भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग जबलपुर ।

8. झारखण्ड भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग रांची।

9. छत्तीसगढ़ भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग रायपुर।

10. पश्चिमी मुद्रण वर्ग , भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग नई दिल्ली । 11. पंजाब एवं चण्डीगढ़ भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग चण्डीगढ़ ।

12. हरियाण , भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग चण्डीगढ़ ।

13. हिमाचल प्रदेश भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग चण्डीगढ़ । 488

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

14. गुजरात, दमन व दीव भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र , भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग अहमदाबाद ।

15. पूर्वी मुद्रण वर्ग , भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग कोलकाता । 16. उड़ीसा भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग भुवनेश्वर।

17. आंध्र प्रदेश भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग हैदराबाद ।

18. कर्नाटक भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग बेंगलूर ।

19. पश्चिम बंगाल, सिक्किम एवं अंडमान और निकोबार द्धीप समूह भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग कोलकाता।

20. त्रिपुरा , मणिपुर और मिजोरम भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग सिलचर ।

21. बिहार भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग पटना ।

22. महाराष्ट्र एवं गोवा भू- स्थानिक आंकड़ा केन्द्र, भारतीय सर्वेक्षण विभाग पुणे ।

[फा. सं . 11028/1/2005 ( रा.भा. ) ]

संजीव नायर, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Department of Science and Technology) New Delhi , the 9th January , 2006

S.O. 217. In pursuance of Sub -rule (4) of Rule 10 ofthe Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following office of Survey of India under the Administrative Control of Ministry of Science and Technolygy , 80% staff whereof have acquired the workman knowledge ofHindi: -

1. Uttaranchal Geo-Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India , Dehradun .

2. Business and Publicity Directorate , Survey of India , Dehradun .

3. Northern Printing Group , Survey of India , Dehradun .

4. Uttar Pradesh Geo - Spatial Data Infrastructure, Survey of India , Lucknow .

5. National Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India, New Delhi .

6. Rajasthan Geo-Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India, Jaipur.

7. Madhya Pradesh Geo- Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India , Jabalpur .

8. Jharkhand Geo- Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India, Ranchi.

9. Chhatishgarh Geo - Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India, Raipur.

10. Western Printing Group , Survey of India , New Delhi.

11. Punjab & Chandigarh Geo- Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India , Chandigarh .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 12. Haryana Geo-Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India , Chandigarh.

13. Himachal Pradesh Geo- Spatial Data Centre, Survey of India , Chandigarh.

14. Gujrat , Daman and Diu Geo -Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India , Ahemdabad .

15. Eastern Printing Group , Survey of India , Kolkata.

16. Orissa Geo -Spatial Data Centre, Survey of India , Bhubneshwar.

17. Andhra Pradesh Geo- Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India , Hyderabad .

18. Karnataka Geo-Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India,Bangalore.

19. West Bengal , Sikkim and Andman and Nicobar Islands Geo- Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India, Kolkata.

20. Tripura , Manipur and Mijoram Geo - Spatial Data Centre, Survey of India, Silchar .

21. Bihar Geo -Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India , Patna.

22. Maharastra and Goa Geo - Spatial Data Centre , Survey of India , Pune .

[F. No. 11028/1/2005 (OL) ]

SANJIV NAIR, Jt . Secy .

सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 22 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ.218.- इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 20-6-2005 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अनुक्रम में और चलचित्रकी ( प्रमाणन) नियमावली, 1983 के नियम 7 व 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्रकी अधिनियम, 1952( 1952 का 37) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( i ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केंद्रीय सरकार, श्री नरेन्द्र रेड्डी, ए-701 , पूनम अपार्टमेंट, वरली , मुंबई-18 को 2 वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो, केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के मुंबई सलाहकार पैनल के सदस्यों के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 809/1/2004- एफ. ( सी ) ]

पी.पी. नायर, डैस्क अधिकारी MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROAD CASTING

New Delhi , the 22nd November, 2005 S.O. 218. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even unmber dated 20-06-2005 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 ofthe Cinematograplı Act, 1952 ( 37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri Narender Reddy , A- 701 , Poonam Apartments , Worli , Mumbai - 18 as member of the Mumbai AdvisoryAdvisory Panel of Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period oftwo years or until furtuer orders , whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 809/ 1 /2004 - F ( C) ]

P. P. NAIR , Desk Officer 489 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 219.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स तुलसी ट्रेडिंग कम्पनी, 33/1 नेताजी सुभाष रोड, कोलकाता-700001 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " पी एम 7263 एम एल डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के सदृश सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु- विषम भुज तुला ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " तुलसी " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 /60 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) यांत्रिक लीवर आधारित, सदृश सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल- सेतु-विषमभुज तुला प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है तथा मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) का है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि.ग्रा. है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि. ग्राम या उसे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं " ई " मान 1 10,2 10 * या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 146) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 490

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2005

S.O. 219. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 6t) of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - Sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge - Steel yard type ) with analogue indication (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class - III) and " PM 7263 MLW " series with brand name " Tulsi " manufactured by M/ s. Tulsi Trading Company , 33/1 , Netaji Subhas Road , Kolkota - 700 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005 /6t ) ;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a mechanical lever based non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge - Steelyard type ) with analogue indication of maximum capacity of 50 tonne , minimum capacity 200kg . and belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class - III ) . The vlue of verification scale interval ' e ' is 10 kg.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5t)t) to 10,1000 for ' e ' value of 5kg . or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 146)/ 2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

491

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 220.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स हेलिक्स इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स, बी/4 , जलराम अपार्टमेंट, बी/एच विसामो फ्लेट, स्मरूति मन्दिर रोड़, घोडासर, मानिनगर, अहमदाबाद-50 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एच एक्स -203 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " हेलिक्स डिजी स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/947 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 किलो ग्राम है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा ० है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि० ग्राम से 50 मि ० ग्राम के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 मि० ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मानके लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 1010 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 173 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 492

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 21st December , 2005

S.O. 220. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained usc and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- Sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said.Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " HX - 230 " scries of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " HELIX Digi Scale " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Helix Instruments , B/ 4 , Jalaram Apartment , B /H Visamo Flate , Smruti Mandir Road , Ghodasar , Maninagar , Ahmedabad -50 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/ 2005/947;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- Section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 50mg . and with nubmer of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10% , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 173 )/ 2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

493

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 221.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स हेलिक्स इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स, बी/4 , जलराम अपार्टमेंट, बी/ एच विसामो फ्लेट, स्मरूति मन्दिर रोड़ , घोडासर , मानिनगर, अहमदाबाद -50 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एच एक्स -509 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , संसूचन, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " हेलिक्स डिजी स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 /948 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 किलो ग्राम है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 किलो ग्रा० है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम से अधिक और 5000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्यहैं ।

[ फा. सं . डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 173 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 55 GI /2006-2 494

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 21st December , 2005

S.O. 221. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods sustained use and to render accurate servis cinder varied conditions ;

Now , therefore , in exercise of use meers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating non - automatic ( Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " HX - 509 " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class - iii ) and with brand name " HELIX Digi Scale " (hereinafter referred as to the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Helix Instruments , B/4 , Jalaram Apartment , B /H Visamo Flate , Smruti Mandir Road , Ghodasar, Maninagar , Ahmedabad- 50 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /2005 /948;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternatve current power supply;

In addition to scaling the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for e` value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 % , or 5 × 10% , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 173 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 495 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 222.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स खरकर डाई वर्क्स डी-91 / 1 , एम आई डी सी सतपुर रोड, नासिक-422007 ( महाराष्ट्र ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " के एच डी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मांडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " खरकर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/ 595 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 24 कि. ग्राम है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहिन 30 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 114)/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 496

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2t) t) 5

S.O. 222. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 6 ) of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " KHD " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - 11 ) and with brand name " KHARKAR " ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Kharkar Die Works D - 91 / 1 , M.I.D.C. Satpur Road , Nashik-422 007 ( Maharashtra ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/05/595:

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 24kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 1100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also to done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50t0t) for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 510,00t) for ' e ' value of 1100ing or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2× 10k , or 5x10 %, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 114 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

497

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 223. -केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स खरकर डाई वर्क्स डी-91 / 1 , एम आई डी सी सतपुर रोड, नासिक -422007 ( महाराष्ट्र ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " के एच पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार) के मॉडल का जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " खरकर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/ 596 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. है औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

PLATFORM

FEATURES

500 / 1000K

30 hours Banery

Back up Heavy stainless

steel pan

Environmentally

protected Load cell

Auto zerotracking Software Calibration

Onpaniel Indicator

ACON

BATTCHARGE

BATTMODE

LOWBATT

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 114 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 498

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2005

S.O. 223. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating , non - automatic ( Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " KHP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy Class - III ) and with brand name " KHARK AR " ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Kharkar Die Works D - 91 / 1 , M.I.D.C. Satpur Road, Nashik - 422 007 ( Maharashtra ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005 /596 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 500 kg and maximum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instruinent operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

PLATFORM

SCALE

FEATURES

500/1000Kg

30 hoursBaltery

Backup Heavy slanjess steelpan

Environmentally protectedLoadcell

Auto zerotracking

SoftwareCanbration

On panel indicator

AGON

BATT CHARGE

BATT.MODE

LOW BATT

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also bo done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 1000 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ` e` value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , inanufactured by the same manufacturer in with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 114)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

499

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली , 22 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 224.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शार्प सिस्टम , लिओ बिल्डिंग, रेलवे गेट के निकट, कालीकट रोड, अंगादीपपुरम, मालापुरम ( डीटी ) , केरल-679321 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस एस पी बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " शार्प " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/495 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (9 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 500

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2005

S.O. 224. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " SS - PB " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " SHARP " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactaredby M/ s . Sharp Systems , Leo Building , Near Railway Gate , Calicut Road , Angadippuram, Malappuram ( DT) , Kerala -679321 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005 //495 :

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 9 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

501

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 225.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शार्प सिस्टम , लिओ बिल्डिंग , रेलवे गेट के निकट, कालीकट रोड़, अंगादीपपुरम , मालापुरम ( डीटी ) , केरल -679321 द्वारा निर्मित मध्य यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस एस ई एम पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित, तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म के लिए कंवर्जन किट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " शार्प " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/05/493 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक तोलन उपकरण है और इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1,00,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 1 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5,000 से 1,00,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 1,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 9 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 55 Gl /2006-3 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2005

S.O. 225. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (6 ) of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit for Platform ) with " SS - EMP " series belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SHARP " ( herein after referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sharp Systems , Leo Building Near Railway Gate , Calicut Road. Angadippuraın , Malappuram (DT) , Kerala -679321 and which is assigned the approval mark IND 09/05/493 ;

The said Model ( see the figure given below ) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 300 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 1,000 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 1.00,000 for ' e ' value of Img. to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5,000 to 1,00,000 for ' e ' value of 1g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5x100 % , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 9 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 503 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 226.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शार्प सिस्टम, लिओ बिल्डिंग , रेलवे गेट के निकट, कालीकट रोड, अंगादीपपुरम, मालापुरम ( डीटी ) , केरल -679321 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस एस ई एम डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित, तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु के लिए कंवर्जन किट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " शार्प " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/05/494 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु के लिए कंवर्जन किट प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30,000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 9 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 504

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2005

S.O. 226. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (conversion kit for weighbridge ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of " SS - EMW " series with brand name " SHARP " ( herein after referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sharp Systems , Leo Building, Near Railway Gate , Calicut Road , Angadippuranı , Malappuram (DT) , Kerala- 67932 land which is assigned the approval mark IND 09/05 // 494;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( conversion kit for weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 30,000 kg. and minimum capacity of 200 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 5t) Hertz alternate current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further . in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby deelares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 , 210 , or 5 × 10 %, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 9)/2005]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 505 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 227.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स शार्प सिस्टम, लिओ बिल्डिंग , रेलवे गेट के निकट, कालीकट रोड, अंगादीपपुरम, मालापुरम ( डीटी ) , केरल -679321 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस एस डब्ल्यू बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " शार्प " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 05/492 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40,000 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " माननि 11 ×× 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 9 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 506

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2005

S.O. 227. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (sce the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge type ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of " SS- WB " series with brand name " SHARP " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sharp Systems , Lco Building . Near Railway Gate, Calicut Road, Angadippuram , Malappuram ( DT) , Kerala - 679321 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /05 /492;

The said model is a non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 40,000 kg and minimum capacity of 20t) kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is It) kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ; The load cell is of strain gauge type .

In addition to scaling the stamping plate , scaling shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg . or more and with ' c ' value 1 × 110k, 2× 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 9)/21005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 507 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 228.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वादभाग डिजीटल स्केल्स एण्ड सिस्टम, 104 ए, अपरा प्लाजा, प्लाट नं० 29, रोड नं० 44 , कम्युनिटी सेंटर, पीतमपुरा, नई दिल्ली द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " वी टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए आई डब्ल्यूए डिजीटल स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/05 / 1018 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

AIWA

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप - प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का माान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 313 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2005

S.O. 228. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of " VT " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " AIWA DIGITAL SCALE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s Vadbhag Digital Scales & systems , 104 A, Apra Plaza , Plot No. 29 , Road No. 44 , Community Centre , Pitam Pura, New Delhi- 110034 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /05 / 1018 ;

AIWA

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' c ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 % , 2×10k, or 5x10 %, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 313 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

509

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006 /माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर , 2005 '

का.आ. 229.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वादभाग डिजीटल स्केल्स एण्ड सिस्टम , 104 ए, अपरा प्लाजा, प्लाट नं० 29 , रोड नं० 44 , कम्युनिटी सेंटर, पीतमपुरा , नई दिल्ली द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " वी पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए आई डब्ल्यूए डिजीटल स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/05 / 1019 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

AIWA

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1,000 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 ,10 , 22 ×× 1010 केके या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 313 )/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 55 G1 / 2006-4 510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II - SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2005

S.O. 229. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non -automatic . ( Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " VP " serics of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) and with brand name " AIWA Digital Scale " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Vadbhag Digital Scales & Systems , 104 - A , Apra Plaza , Plot No. 29 , Road No. 44, Community Centre, Pitam Pura . New Delhi - 110034 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 05 / 1019 ;

AIWA

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg. and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 200g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5000 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (313)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 511 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/ माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 230.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स गिरनार स्केल, शिवाजी नगर, सावरकेठा 364515 द्वारा काउंटर मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " गिरनार स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/2004/ 333 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

GIRNAR SCALE

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक 10 किलोग्राम की अधिकतम क्षमता वाली काउंटर मशीन है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 262 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 512

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] New Delhi , the 23rd December, 2005

S.O. 230.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of counter machine with brand name " Girnar Scale " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Girnar Scale, Shivaji Nagar , Savarkundala - 364515 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND /109 /t) 4/333 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a counter machine with maximum capacity of 10 kg .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 262 )/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 513 [ भाय II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 231.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स भारत स्मार्ट पम्पस , ई -187 , जी आई डी सी, इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स एस्टेट, सेक्टर-26, गांधी नगर-382028 गुजरात द्वारा निर्मित " एच " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित डिस्पेंसिंग पम्प के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्मार्ट " है ( जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /05/642 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल योगमापी अप्रतिवर्तीय सहित धनात्मक विस्थापन मीटर प्रकार का दो पिस्टन वाला बहु उत्पाद डिस्पेंसिंग पम्प है । पम्प की अधिकतम क्षमता पांच अंकक प्रदर्श द्वारा प्रदर्शित की जाती है और इसका न्यूनतम मापन भाग 10 मि.ली. है । इसमें मात्रा और रकम के लिए पूर्व नियत युक्तिहै । मशीन का परीक्षण न्यूनतम 80 लीटर प्रति मिनट की प्रवाह दर पर किया गया था । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 66)/2004]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2005

S.O. 231. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the said model of dispensing pump with digital indication of " H " series and with brand name " SMART " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Bharat Smart Pumps , E- 187 , GIDC Electronic Estate , Sector -26 , Gandhi Nagar - 382028 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/05/642;

Sealing : In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the measuring unit , totalizers for fraudulent practices :

The said model ( sce the figure given ) is a multi - product dispensing pump with two piston type positive displacement meter along with non - reversible totalizer . The maximum volume capacity of the pump is indicated by a five digit display and the smallest scale division is 10 ml. It has a pre set device for volume and amount . The machine was tested at a minimum flow rate of 80 litre per minute . The instrument opcrates on 230V , 50Htz alternate current power supply . The Light Emitting Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the result .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 66)/2100-4]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 515 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 232.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एक्यूमैस वेईंग सिस्टम, # 15 रेड हिल्स रोड, चेन्नई-600099 तमिलनाडु, द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ए एम - पीसी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( कनवर्जन किट फार प्लेटफार्म मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्यूमैक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 05 / 279 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( कनवर्जन किट फार प्लेटफार्म मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शतप्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के "ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 1010 के,के, 2 × 1010 केके या 5 × 1010 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 368 ) /2004 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1. 1927

PART 11 - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 232. Whereas the Central Governinent , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit for Platform machine) with digital indication of " AM - PC series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ACCUMAX " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Accumax Weighing System, # 15 , Red Hills Road , Chennai - 600099 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/05/279 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit for Platform machine ) with a maximum capacity of 300 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100 g . 11 has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to scaling the stamping plate , scaling shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machime for fraudulent practices;

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and up to 1000 kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500, to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10 * , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 368 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 517 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 233.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एक्यूमैस वेईंग सिस्टम , # 15 रेड हिल्स रोड, चेन्नई -600099 तमिलनाडु, द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( मथार्थता वर्ग-III ) वाले " ए एम- पीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन , सहित अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्यूमैक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05/ 278 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल कानिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई" मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 368 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 55 G1/2006-5 518

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th December, 2005

S.O. 233. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Governntent hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of " AM - PT " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III) and with brand name " ACCUMAX" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Accumax Weighing System , # 15 , Red Hills Road, Chennai - 600099 , Tamil Badu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 05/278:

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weinghing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 4kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the ureighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machime for fraudulent practices:

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000kg with verification seale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' c ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 %, cr 5 × 10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 368)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 519 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927.

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 234.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एक्यूमैस वेईंग सिस्टम , # 15 रेड हिल्स रोड, चेन्नई -600099 तमिलनाडु द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एएम- पीपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित, तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्यूमैक्स " है ( जिसे इसके इसमें पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/05 / 277 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 कि. ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 1000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 368 )/2004] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 520

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 234. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of " AM - PP" series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - 11 ) and with brand name " ACCUMAX" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Accumax Weighing System , # 15 , Red Hills Road, Chennai - 600099 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/05/277 :

The said model is strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 600 kg and minimum capacity of 2.5 kg . The verification scale interval ( c) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to scaling the stamping plate , scaling shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighting instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 1000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 100k , 2x10k , or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 368 )/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 521 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 235.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एक्यूमैस वेईंग सिस्टम , # 15 रेड हिल्स रोड, चेन्नई -600099 तमिलनाडु, द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए एम - टी बी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्यूमैक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदनं चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 05 /276 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (368 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 522

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 235. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of " AM - TB " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class- III) and with brand name " ACCUMAX" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/ s Accumax Weighing System , # 15, Red Hills Road, Chennai - 600099 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/276;

The said Model is strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 3t) kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same scries with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' c ' value of 100 mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' c ' value of 5g. or more and with e value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 (368)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 523 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 236.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एक्यूमैस वेईंग सिस्टम, # 15 रेड हिल्स रोड, चेन्नई-600099 तमिलनाडु द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एएम- जे पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित, तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्यूमैक्स " है ( जिसे इसमे इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05 / 275 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन की कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 368 ) /2004 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 524

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 236. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of " AM - JP " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " ACCUMAX " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Accumax Weighing System , # 15 , Red Hills Road , Chennai - 600099 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/275 :

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( c ) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 23t) Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 50000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10) , 2 × 100k , or 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (368 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 525 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 237.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स अंजाल ट्रेडिंग कम्पनी , नं. 36 , वाणीगवालगाम, न्यूमदुरै बाई पास रोड, कारुर -639002 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यूटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अपोलो " है ( जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05/ 1057 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षनता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 287 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 55 GI /2006-6 526

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 28th December . 2005

S.O. 237. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model deseribed in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1967 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained us and to render accurate servinder varied conditions :

Now therefore, in exercise of the vers conferred by Sub- sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Goveremeni hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic ( Table top type ) weighing astroent with digital indication of "AWT " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand RC " APPOLLO " ( hereinreferred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Anjaal Trading Co. , No. 36 , Vanigawalagam. New Madurai Bye - Pass Road , Karur - 639002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 05/1057;

The said model is strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per eent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 5t) Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate . sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 10t0mg . to 2g . or . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 11) or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 287 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY . Director of Legal Metrology 527 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 238.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मात्रक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स अंजाल ट्रेडिंग कम्पनी, नं. 36 , वाणीगवालगाम, न्यूमदुरै बाई पास रोड, कारुर -639002 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यूपी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित, तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अपोलो " है ( जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05 / 1058 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक गा ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्यहैं । के

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 287 ) / 2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 528

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 238. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating. non - automatic . ( Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AWP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "APPOLLO " ( hereinreferred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Anjaal Trading Co. , No. 36 , Vanigavalagam , New Madurai Byc - Pass Road , Karur - 639002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 05 / 1058 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g . It has a tare devicewith 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate . sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero . manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 287) /2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 529

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 239.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स हास्सिया रिडेट्रान पैकेजिंग मशीनरी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, गेट नं. 768/3, सानसवाडी, शिरूर तालुका, जिला पुणे -411207 महाराष्ट्रा द्वारा के निर्मित रेफ (एक्स) यथार्थता वर्ग वाले , जहां एक्स 1 है " बी जी एम " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित , भरात्मक भरण मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " हास्सिया " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005 / 314 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित स्वचालित भरण उपकरण बहुशीर्ष तोलक है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा . है । इसकी अधिकतम भरणदर 150 भरण प्रति मिनट है । इसका प्रदर्श प्रतिदिप्ति प्रदर्श ( एफ एल डी ) प्रकार का है । मशीन को चाय, चीनी, चावल बीज, मिष्ठान, बिस्कुट, आलू चिप्स , दालें, मेवे, मिसरी और इसी प्रकार के मुक्त प्रवाह वाले उत्पादों को भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । उपकरण 440 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के सीलबंद के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के भरण उपकरण भी होंगे जो रेंज में 2 ग्रा. से 1 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 214 ) /2004 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 530

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 239. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of automatic , gravimetric filling instrument of " BCM" series belonging to accuracy class Ref ( x) , Where x = land with brand name ' HASSIA ' (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/ s. Hassia Redatron Packaging Machinery Private Limited, Gate No. 768/3 , Sanaswadi , Taluka Shirur, District-Pune- 411 207 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2005/314;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic gravimetric filling instrument ( multi head weigher ) . Its maximum capacity is 1kg. It has a maximum fill rate of 150 fills per minute. Its display is of Fluorescent Lamp Display ( FLD ) type . The machine is designed for filling free flowing products like tea , sugar, rice , seeds, confectionery , biscuits , potato chips , pulses , dry fruits, candies and the like. The instrument operates on 440 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 214)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 531 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 240.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स हास्सिया रिडेट्रान पैकेजिंग मशीनरी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, गेट नं. 768/3 , सानसवाडी, शिरूर तालुका, जिला पुणे -411207 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा के निर्मित रेफ (एक्स ) यथार्थता वर्ग वाले, जहां एक्स 1 है " एन एल एस " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित , भरात्मक भरण मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " हास्सिया" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 / 315 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित स्वचालित भरण उपकरण बहुशीर्ष तोलक है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसकी अधिकतम भरणदर 25 भरण प्रति मिनट है । इसका प्रदर्श प्रतिदिप्ति प्रदर्श ( एफ एल डी) प्रकार का है । मशीन को चाय , चीनी, चावल , बीज, मिष्ठान, बिस्कुट, आलू चिप्स, दालें, मेवे , मिसरी और इसी प्रकार के मुक्त प्रवाह वाले उत्पादों को भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । उपकरण 440 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के सीलबंद के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के भरण उपकरण भी होंगे जो रेंज में 2 ग्रा . से 5 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 214 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 532

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 28th December, 2005

S.O. 240. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of automatic , gravimetric filling instrument of " NLS " series belonging to accuracy class Ref (x ) , Where x = land with brand name ' HASSIA' (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Hassia Redatron Packaging Machinery Private Limited, Gate No. 768/3 , Sanaswadi , Taluka Shirur , District-Pune-411 207 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2005/315 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic gravimetric filling instrument (net weigher) . Its maximum capacity is 5kg . It has a maximum fill rate of 25 fills per minute . Its display is of Light Emitting Diode ( LED) type. The machine is designed for filling free flowing products like tea, sugar, rice , seeds , confectionery , biscuits , potato chips , pulses , dry fruits , candies and the like . The instrument operates on 44t) Volts and 5t) Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to preventevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM- 21 (214 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 533 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जमवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 241.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा ठसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मामक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स हास्सिया रिडेट्रान पैकेजिंग मशीनरी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , गेट नं. 768/3 , सानसवाडी, शिरूर तालुका, जिला पुणे -411207 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा के निर्मित रेफ ( एक्स) यथार्थता वर्ग वाले, जहां एक्स 1 है " कोन्टी बैग " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित, भरात्मक भरण मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " हास्सिया " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005 /316 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विद्युत् यांत्रिक वालिम रूप से नियंत्रित स्वचालित भारात्मक भरण उपकरण बहुशीर्ष तोलक है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसकी अधिकतम भरणदर 60 भरण प्रति मिनट है । मशीन को चाय , चीनी, चावल बीज , मिष्ठान, बिस्कुट, आलू चिप्स, दालें, पाउडर और इसी प्रकार के मुक्त प्रवाह वाले उत्पादों को भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । उपकरण 440 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबंद के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के भरण उपकरण भी होंगे जो 2 ग्रा. से 5 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 214 )/2004]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 55G1 /2006-7 [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] 534

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 20006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 241. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (Sec the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of automatic , gravimetric filling instrunient of " CONTIBAG " series with brand name HASSIA ' ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Hassia Redatron Packaging Machinery Private Limited, Gate No. 768/3 , Sanaswadi , Taluka Shirur , District -Pune - 11 207 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/316 ;

The said model is an electromechanical pneumatically controlled automatic gravimetric filling instrument . Its maximum capacity is 5kg . It has a maximum fill rate of 60 fills per minute . The machine is designed for filling free flowing products like tea , sugar , rice , seeds , confectionery , biscuits, potato chips , pulses, powder and the like . The instrument operates on 440 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to scaling the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM-21 (214)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 535 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 242.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स क्लासिक वेइंग इंस्ट्रूमेंटस, सं. 444, सेक्टर -11 , पंचकुला, चण्डीगढ़-134112 पंजाब द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " पी एन टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " क्लासिक" है (जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005/ 290 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबंद किया जानाः स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट की सीलबंद करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंदीकी जाएगी ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्तं शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक ' ई ' मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 223 ) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 536

[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 242. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " PNT " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " CLASSIC" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Classic Weighing Instruments, No. 444 , Sector - 11 , Panchakula, Chandigarh- 134 112 , Punjab and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/290;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

And Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (223 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 537 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 243 ,- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स क्लासिक वेइंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स, सं. 444, सेक्टर-11, पंचकुला , चण्डीगढ़-134 112 , पंजाब द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एन के पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " क्लासिक " है ( जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 / 291 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 कि. ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा पर कार्य करता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा . या उससे अधिक ' ई ' मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 223) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 538

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[ PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 243. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers confcrred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of "NKP " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " CLASSIC " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Classic Weighing Instrumetns. No. 444 , Sector - 11 , Panchakula , Chandigarh - 134 112 , Punjab and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/05/ 291 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 600kg and minimum capacity of 2.5kg . The verification scale interval ( c ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

And Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 1000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 223 ) /2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 539 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 244.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मोटर इंडस्ट्रीज कम्पनी लिमिटेड, पैकेजिंग टेक्नोलोजी डिवीजन, होसर रोड, आडूगोडी, बंगलौर-560030 द्वारा निर्मित रेफ ( X ) यथार्थता वर्ग जहां X = 1 है , वाले " एडी डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, स्वचालित, भारात्मक भरण मशीन ( चयनात्मक संयोजन तोलक प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यामाटो " है ( जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05 / 588 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) रेफ ( X ) यथार्थता वर्ग जहां X = I है , स्वचालित भारात्मक भरण मशीन ( चयनात्मक संयोजन तोलक) है । इसकी क्षमता रेंज 10-20 शी में तोलन की संख्या सहित 4 ग्रा. से 500 ग्रा. तक है । इसका उपयोग स्नेहक आहार, मेवे , हिमशीतित आहार, कन्डीज आदि जैसे भार टुकड़े वाली सामग्रियों को तोलने के लिए किया जाता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।

Yamato

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 275) /2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 540

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th December , 2005

S.O. 244.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating , Automatic Gravimetric Filling Machine ( selective combination weigher ) of " ADW " series of accuracy class Ref (x ) where X = 1 with brand name "YAMATO " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s Motor Industries Co. Ltd. , Packaging Technology Division, Hosur Road, Adugodi , Bangalore -560 030 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 05 /588;

The said model (see the figure given below) is an automatic gravimetric filling machine (Selective combination weigher ) of accuracy class Ref. (x ) where X= 1 , with capacity range from 4g to 500g with nubmer of weighing heads 10-20 . It is used for weighing materials having piece weight suclı as snack foods , dry fruits , frozen foods , candies etc. It fills 150 fills per minute ( max ). The instrument operates on 4410 - Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply ;

In addition to scaling stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Yamato

[F. No. WM-21 ( 275 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 541 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 245.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स परम टेक्नॉलाजी , नं. 152 , माहदा काम्प्लैक्स, महेश नगर कार्नर, पिम्परी , पुणे -411018 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " पी सी डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( चैक वेइंग प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " परम " है ( जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05/ 1049 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( चेक वेइंग प्रकार) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 25 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 500 मि. ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 287) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 55 G1 / 2006-8 542

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th December, 2005

S.O. 245. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Modcis ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Check Weighing type ) with digital indication of " PCW " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class- II ) and with brand name " Poram " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Param Technologics , No. 152 , Mahada Complex . Mahesh Nagar Corner, Pimpri , Pune -411 018 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/1049;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Check Weighing type) with a maximum capacity of 5kg and minimum capacity of 25g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 50mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument opcrates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate . sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the ninge of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ` e` value of 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * , or 5x10 . where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zera manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 287 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 543 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2006

का.आ. 246.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/ किये गये हैं:-

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की सं वर्ष और शीर्षक

(2)

(4) (1)

(3)

31दिसम्बर 2005

02, दिसम्बर 2005

1 398 ( भाग 5): 1992 शिरोपरि प्रेषण उद्येश्योंकेलिए ऐल्युमिनियम चालक विशिष्टि ( भाग 5 ) अतिरिक्त उच्च वोल्टता ( 400 कि वो और अधिक ) के लिए जस्तीकृत - इस्पात- प्रबलित ऐल्युमिनियम के चालक

इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9, बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयुपर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. ईटी 37/टी-23 ]

पी. के. मुखर्जी, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 9th January , 2006

S.O. 246. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the Indian Standards

No. & Year of the Amendment Date from which the Amendment shall have effect Sl. No.

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

02. December 2005

31 December 2005 IS 398 (Part 5 ): 1992 Aluminium conductor for overhead transmission purposes- Specification (Part 5) Aluminium conductors-galvanized steel-reinforced for extra high voltage ( 400 kV and above) (firstrevision)

Copy of this Amendment is availabe with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. ET 37 /T - 23 ]

P. K. MUKHERJEE, Sci . F & Head ( Electro. Technical ) 544

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 247.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्याऔर वर्ष

(3)

(1) ( 2)

(4)

30सितम्बर 2005

आईएस 10569: 1983

आई एस 10569: 2005 एल्यूमिनियम कांस्य की छडें एवं सेक्श्न-विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , १ , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयुपर , कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. एमटीडी 8 /टी -109 ]

एस. के. गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

New Delhi , the 9th January , 2006

S.O. 247. In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl . No. & Year of the Indian Standards No. Established

No. & Years of Indian Standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

IS 10569 : 1983

30 Sept. 2005

1 IS 10569 : 2005-Aluminium bronze rods , bars andsection- Specification ( first revision)

Copy of this Standard is availabe with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices; Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. MTD 8 /T- 109 ]

S.K. GUPTA , Sci . F & Head ( MTD)

नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2006

का.आ. 248.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:-

545 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

30सितम्बर 2005

आईएस 7814 : 2005

1 आई एस 7814 2005 फौस्फर कांस्य की चादर, पत्ती एवं पन्नी-विशिष्टि (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

रतीय संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयुपर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. एमटीडी 8 /टी -93 ]

एस. के. गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

New Delhi , the 9th January , 2006

S.O. 248. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

No. & Years of Indian Standards , Date of Established Sl . No. & Year of the Indian Standards No. Established

if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(3)

(1) (2)

(4)

IS 7814 : 2005

30 Sept. 2005

1 IS 7814 : 2005-Phosphor bronze sheet , strip and foil- Specificiation revision)

Copy of this Second Standard is availabe for state with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices ; Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune Thiruvananthapuram .

[ No. MTD 8/T- 93 ]

S.K. GUPTA, Sci . F & Head (MTD)

नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 249.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो जिन एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:-

546

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की सख्यां वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

30 सितम्बर 2005

आईएस 6912 : 1985

1 आई एस 6912: 2005- ताँबा एवं ताँबा मिश्र धातु के गढाई स्टॉक एवं गढाई विशिष्टि (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १, बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयुपर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. एमटीडी 8/टी -73 ]

एस. के. गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी )

New Delhi , the 9th January , 2006

S.O. 249. In pursuance of clanse (b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules . 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl . No. & Year of the hidian Standards No. Established

No. & Year of Indian Standards . if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(1)

(2)

(3)

IS6912 : 1985

30 Sept. 2005

1 IS 6912 : 2005- Copper and Copper. AlloysForging Stock and Forging- Specificiation (Second Revision )

Copy of this Standard is availabe for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 , Bahadur Shala Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices ; Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar. Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur . Nagpur. Patna, Pune Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. MTD 8 /T - 73 ]

S.K. GUPTA , Sci . F & Head (MTD)

नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी , 2006

का.आ. 250.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

547 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

(3)

(1)

(2)

(4)

जुलाई 2005

आईएस 9779 : 1981

काअतिक्रमण करते हुए

आई एस 15575 ( भाग 2 ) : 2005 IEC 61672-2 ( 2003 ) विद्युतध्वनिकि ध्वनि तल मीटर भाग 2 पैटर्न मूल्यांकन परीक्षण

सितम्बर 2005

आईएस 9302 : ( भाग 1 ) 1979 का अतिक्रमण करते हुए

आई एस 15596 ( भाग 1 ) : 2005 IEC 60268-1 ( 1985 ) ध्वनि तंत्र उपस्कर- भाग 1 समान्य

सितम्बर 2005

आईएस 9302: ( भाग 2 ) 1979 का अतिक्रमण करते हुए

आई एस 15596 ( भाग 2 ) : 2005 IEC 60268-2 ( 1987 ) ध्वनि तंत्र उपस्कर- भाग 2 समान्य परिभाषाओं एवं परिकलन विधियों की व्याख्या

अगस्त 2005

आईएस 9302 : ( भाग 3 ) 1981 काअतिक्रमण करते हुए

आई एस 15596 ( भाग 3 ) : 2005 IEC 60268-3 ( 2000 ) ध्वनि तंत्र उपस्कर- भाग 3 एम्पलीफ़ायर

अगस्त 2005 5 आई एस 15596 ( भाग 5 ) : 2005 IEC 60268-5 ( 2005 ) ध्वनि तंत्र उपस्कर- भाग 5 लाउडस्पीकर

अगस्त 2005

आईएस 9302: ( भाग 7 ) 1987 का अतिक्रमण करते हुए

आई एस 15596 ( भाग 7) : 2005 IEC 60268-7 ( 1996 ) ध्वनि तंत्र उपस्कर- भाग 7 हैडफोन एवम् इंयरफोन

दिसम्बर 2005

आईएस 24357 : 2002

का अतिक्रमण करते हुए

7 आई एस/आई एस ओ/ आई ई सी 17799 : 2005 सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी- सुरक्षा तकनीक- सूचना सुरक्षा प्रबन्ध के लिए रीति संहिता

दिसम्बर 2005

आईएस 15150: 2002

का अतिक्रमण करते हुए

आई एस/आई एस ओ/आई ई सी 27001 : 2005 सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी- सुरक्षा तकनीक- सूचना सुरक्षा प्रबन्धप्रणाली-अपेक्षाएं

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयुपर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. एलटीडी/जी-75 ]

सुख बीर सिंह, प्रमुख ( एलआईटीडी)

New Delhi , the 10th January , 2006

S.O. 250.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against cach :

548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1. 1927

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. & Year of the Indian Standards

Date of Established No. Established

No. & Years of Indian Standards . if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

July 2005

1981

Superseding IS 9779:

1 IS 15575 ( Part 2) : 2005 IEC 61672-2 (2003) Electroacoustics - sound level meters : Part 2 Pattern Evaluation Tests

September 2005

Superseding IS 9302 ( Part 1 ) : 1985

2 IS 15596 ( Part 1): 2005/ IEC 60268-1 ( 1985 ) Sound systemequipment-Part 1 General

September 2005

Superseding IS 9302 ( Part 2 ) : 1979

3 IS 15596 (Part 2) : 2005/IEC60268-2 ( 1987 ) Sound system equipment - Part 1 Explanation ofgeneral terms and calculation methods

August 2004

Superseding IS 9302 ( Part 3 ): 1981

4 IS 15596 ( Part 3) : 2005/IEC 60268-3 (2000 ) Sound system equipment- Part 3 Amplifiers

August 2005 5 IS 15596 (Part 5 ) : 2005/ IEC 60268-5 (2003 ) Sound systemequipment-Part 5 Loudspeakers

August 2005

Superseding IS 9302 ( Part 7 ) : 1987

6 IS 15596 ( Part 7 ): 2005/IEC 60268-7 ( 1996 ) Sound systemequipment -Part 7 Headphones and earphones

December 2005

Superseding IS 14357 : 2002

7 IS /ISO/IEC 17799 : 2005 Information Technology - Code of practice for information security management

December 2005

Superseding IS 15150 : 2002

8 IS /ISO/IEC 27001 : 2005 Information Technology - Information security management systems -Requirements

Copy of this Standard is availabe for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices; Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. LTD/G- 75 ]

SUKH BIR SINGH , Head ( LITD) 549

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी, 2006

क का. आ. 251.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेटोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिएः और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए:

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार पेटोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है.

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में भरत लाल ननामा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं ए-15 , सुंदरवन कस्तुरबा नगर , सुमंगल गार्डन के पास रतलाम -457001 (मध्यप्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप मे आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूचि

तहसील - बाजना

जिला रतलाम

राज्य- मध्य प्रदेश कमांक

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नम्बर

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में 1

जाबड.

264

0.1963

283/1

0.5930

266

0.0899

267

0.3048

268

0.0842

284

0.2906

285

0:0455

288

0.0373

290

0.1040

291

0.1658

292

0.0259

293

0.1948

294

0.0569

295

0.2366

296

0.0384 55GI/2006-9 [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] 550

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

0.0354

297

जाबड़ ( री )

0.2815

298

1.3725

434

0.0173

468

1.2257

469

0.0108

466

0.0160

5/267

सिन्दुरीया

0.1760

0.0652

0.4423

0.0101

0.0710

0.2496

0.4685

0.1685

0.0050

0.1895

0.0823

0.0306

146

0.3394

149

0.1068

153

0.1923

154

0.1796

156

0.0014

157

167

0.0694

165

0.0218

0.0144

188

191

0.1394

0.1131

192

33 सिन्दुरीया निरन्तर...

0.0988

193

0.0410

196

0.1564

195

0.2369

मोरटक्का

0.0211

0.0763

0.3321

0.0499

0.0876

0.0717

0.0091

0.0686

0.6513

0.1664

0.0625

0.0652

0.1126

0.0354

103 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

102 34. मोरटक्का (जारी ...)

113

126

125

127

133

130

129

137

136

135

141

153

155

177

174

173

171

184

170

169

मलवासी

551 0.2696

0.1832

0.0639

0.0246

0.1180

0.1018

0.0470

0.0194

0.0847

0.0538

0.0226

0.0440

0.1275

0.0185

0.0509

0.0757

0.0824

0.1241

0 1881

0.0094

0.0421

प्रमाणित भू अभिलेख अप्राप्त होने से ।

बीकापाटन

1 37

430

बिलडी

373

374

375/2

416

378

415

414

469

468/2

468/1

467

483

485

486

507

246

248/2

245

244

237

240

238/3

238/2

238/1 0.4854

0.0012

2.2104

1.2204

0.4168

0.0793

0.0056

0.0491

0.0019

0.1153

0.0587

0.0456

0.0252

0.0648

0.0110

0.1848

0.0829

0.0174

0.0350

0.1074

0.0012

0.2226

0.0818

0.0605

0.0262

0.1116

0.0864

0.0180 552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

156

0.5058 37 बिलड़ी (जारी: 00 )

509

0.0114

155

0.2286

154

0.1312

150

0.0229

148

0.1915

149

0.0314

510

0.7868

146

0.0011

143

0.0143

140

0.1898

धामनियां

115/1

1.7172

115/6

0.4872

115/3

0.1872

115/2

0.8496

0.0017

0.0251

96/17

0.2944

96/12

0.0456

96/11

0.1524

96/14

0.0201

96/8

0.1440

96/3

0.0012

0.1542

84/1

0.1332

84/2

0.0124

0.0023

0.0108

0.0983

70/3

0.2664

70/1

0.0201

0.0056

0.2333

0.0108

71/1

71/2

0.0375

0.1674

अमलीपाडा

0.2256

0.1069

0.1207

0.0285

0.2855

0.2058

0.0507

0.1698

0.7401 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

553

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

0.0268

अमलीपाडा (जारी... )

0.2098

0.5787

0.7723

0.0288

0.2160

134

0.0180

219

[फा. सं. आर-25011/2/2006- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 13th January, 2006

S. O. 251.-. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is Necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( I ) of section 3 of the petroleum and Mineral pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of this notification ; issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public object in writing to the laying of pipeline under the land to Mr. Bharat Lal Nanama , competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office A- 15 , Sundervan , kasturba Nagar , Near Sumangal Garden , Ratlam – 457001 , (Madhya Pradesh ) .

554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

Schedule

District:- Ratlam

State:- Madhyapradesh Tehsil : - Bajna

Area

SURVEY NO

SL.NO. Nameof Village

AREA IN HECTORE

0.1963

264

Jabod

283/1

0.5930

266

0.0899

0.3048

267

0.0842

268

284

0.2906

285

0.0455

288

0.0373

0.1040

290

291

0.1658

292

0.0259

293

0.1948

0.0569

294

295

0.2366

296

0.0384

297

0.0354

298

0.2815

13725

434

468

0.0173

469

1.2257

466

00108

5/267

0.0160

Sinduriya

0.1760

0.0652

0.4423

0.0101

0.0710

0.2496

0.4685

0.1685

0.0050

0.1895

0.0823

146

0.0306

149

0.3394

153

0.1068

154

0.1923

156

0.1796

157

0.0014

167

0.0694

165

0.0218

188

0.0144

191

0.1394 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

3 1

192 Sinduriya Conted ....

193

196

195 34

Mortukka

103

102

113

126

125

127

133

130

129

137

136

135

141

153

155

177

174

173

171

184

170

169 35

Malwasi

NotAvilable on Certified Land Record

Bikapatan

1 37

Bildi

430

373

374

375/2

416

555 4

0.1131

0.0988

0.0410

0.1564

0.2369

0.0211

0.0763

0.3321

0.0499

0.0876

0.0717

0.0091

0.0686

0.6513

0.1664

0.0625

0.0652

0.1126

0.0354

0.2696

0.1832

0.0639

0.0246

0.1180

0.1018

0.0470

0.0194

0.0847

0.0538

0.0226

0.0440

0.1275

0.0185

0.0509

0.0757

0.0824

0.1241

0.1881

0.0094

0.0421

0.4854

0.0012

2.2104

1.2204

0.4168

0.0793

0.0056

0.0491 556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

378

0.0019

Bildi Conted ...

0.1153

415

0.0587

414

469

0.0456

468/2

0.0252

0.0648

468/1

467

0.0110

0.1848

483

0.0829

485

0.0174

486

507

0.0350

246

0.1074

0.0012

248/2

0.2226

245

0.0818

244

0.0605

237

0.0262

240

0.1116

238/3

0.0864

238/2

0.0180

238/1

0.5058

156

0.0114

509

0.2286

155

0.1312

154

0.0229

150

0.1915

148

0.0314

149

0.7868

510

146

0.0011

0.0143

143

140

0.1898

115/1

1.7172

Dhamniya

0.4872

115/6

0.1872

115/3

0.8496

115/2

0.0017

0.0251

0.2944

96/17

0.0456

96/12

0.1524

96/11

96/14

0.0201

0.1440

96/8

0.0012

96/3

0.1542

84/1

0.1332

84/2

0.0124

0.0023

0.0108

0.0983 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

3 1

70/3 38

Dhamniya Conted..

70/1

71/1

71/2

8 39

Amlipara

134

219

557 4

0.2664

0.0201

0.0056

0.2333

0.0108

0.0375

0.1674

0.2256

0.1069

0.1207

0.0285

0.2855

0.2058

0.0507

0.1698

0.7401

0.0268

0.2098

0.5787

0.7723

0.0288

0.2160

0.0180

[ F. No. R-25011/2/ 2006- O.R. -I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 252.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेटोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए:

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना सें संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए :

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार पेटोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है .

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि मे हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में भरत लाल ननामा सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं ए-15 , सुंदरवन कस्तुरबा नगर , सुमंगल गार्डन के पास रतलाम -457001 (मध्यप्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप मे आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा । 55 G1 /2006-10 558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1. 1927

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूचि

जिला रतलाम रतलाम

तहसील

सर्वे नम्बर

गॉव का नाम

क्रमांक

111 40

धबई पाडा

67/1

10/1 /1 /A

10/13

10/1/1/10

10/1/2/45

10/1/1/4

10/1/3

10/1/4

10/1/5

10/1/6

10/1/7

10/1/8

10/1/9

01/10/10

10/1/1/53/2

13/4

11 41

राजपुरा

2/1/9

2/12

2/4/1 42

145

सावलियारूण्डी

19/1/1

100/2

101/4

101/3

143

102/1/2

102/1/1/2

102/1/1/1

103

मध्य प्रदेश

राज्य

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर मे

0.0072

0.1485

0.1080

0.2658

0.6120

0.2103

0.0013

0.1903

0.0088

0.2310

0.2884

0.1296

0.0171

0.0828

0.1271

0.1190

0.1196

0.1253

0.1129

0.1202

0.1414

0.0038

0.7135

0.2245

0.0181

0.2166

0.0120

0.2808

0.2160

1.0800

0.0421

1.0337

0.0175

0.1983

0.0036

0.1917

0.0783

0.0032

0.1409

0.0735

0.3863 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

104/3 42

सावलियारूडी निरन्तर...

104/2

104/1

109

110

112

113/1

113/3

113/2

68/2

68/1

62/1

223 43

सरवनीखुर्द

225

224

226

298

293

295

294

291

136

245

246

134

118

119

117

115

116

74/1

74/2 44

479

बिबडोद

487

486/2

480

495

559 0.0084

0.2228

0.0226

0.1059

0.0796

0.1452

0.0422

0.0819

0.0463

0.3249

0.1127

0.1867

0.0137

0.2664

0.0083

0.2032

0.2577

0.0882

0.0112

0.1558

0.0102

0.0801

0.0499

0.0186

0.1485

0.0121

0.0051

0.1135

0.0181

0.0459

0.1390

0.0788

0.0832

0.0985

0.1296

0.3084

0.0978

0.3768

0.1875

0.1226

0.0886

0.0430

0.3437

0.0163

0.0397 560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

3 44

498

बिबडोद निरन्तर ...

496

497

501

499/1

500

454

455

457

456

458

466/1/1

464

209/1

31 45

38/1/5

जुलवानिया

38/1/1

44/1

43/2

59/2

26/3

26/1

66/4

66/3

67/2/1

67/2/2

79/1

77/1

106

107

108

110

102/6 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 0.0861

0.0072

0.0814

0.0819

0.0290

0.0107

0.0688

0.0379

0.0096

0.1011

0.2491

0.6689

0.0228

0.4735

0.0951

2.2328

0.1562

0.6321

0.0015

0.2002

0.0021

0.0852

0.0047

0.3796

0.0407

0.0472

0.0122

0.1080

0.1859

0.1728

0.0948

0.0559

0.1224

0.1618

0.0396

0.0676

0.2114

0.0825

0.0090

0.0549

0.0546

0.0012

0.3604

0.0891

0.1773 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

105 45

जुलवानिया निरन्तर..

114

136

134

126

167

147

149

164

163/1

151

162

156

157

153/1

155/1

155/2

153/2

154 46

239

नन्दलाई

136/2 47

बंजली

136/1/1/1

50/1

46/1

46/2

48/1

270/1

269/1/1

272

273/1

314/1

311/1

310

311/2

309/2

304

303 48

308/1

सेजावता

307

561 4

0.1765

0.1856

0.3667

0.1728

0.2423

0.1856

0.0910

0.2448

0.0137

0.0843

0.1309

0.0014

0.0854

0.0993

0.0403

0.0352

0.0870

0.0150

0.0645

0.1946

0.1008

0.0250

1.0368

0.1040

0.0417

0.9360

0.0094

0.4186

0.0260

0.0939

0.0607

0.0266

0.1867

0.0377

0.0996

0.2336

0.5897

0.2407

0.1152

0.1413

0.1240

0.0998

0.0849

0.2042

0.0483 562

[ PART II- SEC . 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

सेजावता निरन्तर...

309

0.0335

306/2

0.1998

0.1368

305

0.0698

312/1

304/1

0.1071

314/2

0.0413

304/2

0.0870

297/1

0.1368

297/2

0.2279

296/2

0.0312

292/2

0.1956

0.0646

292/3

0.0279

292/4

292/1

0.0092

0.1011

293/4

293/3

0.0234

0.2282

26/1

0.0410

0.0806

27/1

0.0656

27/2

0.1644

30/5

0.3971

0.1052

31/1

0.0673

0.2548

0.0180

45/1

0.0933

0.1418

0.0919

49/1

0.0338

0.0573

0.0713

81/3

0.1941

81/4

0.2266

80/1

0.8709

80/11

0.0053

0.0495

131/8

0.0900

131/5

0.0864

0.0823

131/10

129

0.0139

0.0179

128/3

0.0355

128/2

128/7

0.3754

162/1

0.1687 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

162/2 48

सेजावता निरन्तर...

166/509/2

166/6

166/2

166/12

167

166/3/1

118/4

118/5

168/3

168/5

168/6

168/7

169/1

169/2

168/1

169/4

168/4

177/5

177/1

179

180/1

181/7

181/1

181/11

181/2

467

927/1 49

बांगरोद

924/4

925/2

928/3

928/2

931/2

931/1

932/1

932/3

932/4

933

932/2

950

951

953

974/1

974/2

974/3

563 4

0.1943

0.0807

0.0792

0.1440

0.1293

0.0753

0.0108

0.0019

0.0489

0.1014

0.1022

0.0951

0.1110

0.0369

0.0478

0.1626

0.0808

0.2234

0.1867

0.0958

0.0199

0.1094

0.0055

0.2276

0.2525

0.0146

0.0388

0.0762

0.1520

0.2821

0.0896

0.2060

0.0672

0.1397

0.0540

0.2850

0.1656

0.0035

0.0504

0.0413

0.0775

0.0841

0.1008

0.1260

0.1080 564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1 , 1927

3 1

974/4 49

बांगरोद निरन्तर.....

974/6

978

980

982/1

1038

977

1314

1259/1

1259/2

1259/3

1260

1259/4

1263

1264

1257

1235

1238

1214

1215

1216

1213/1

1213/2

1211/1

1209

1197

1195

1194

1192

1193

1347

1348

1402/1624

1402/3

1402/1

1402/2

1403/3

1404/3

1406

1277/1628

1441/1

1444

1438

1495 [PART 11 - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4

0.1692

0.2160

0.0969

0.1237

0.0054

0.0396

0.0133

0.0481

0.0612

0.0468

0.0360

0.1275

0.0720

0.0589

0.1628

0.0210

0.1387

0.0602

0.0886

0.0051

0.0442

0.0140

0.0014

0.0936

0.0868

0.0572

0.1123

0.0591

0.0247

0.0180

0.0146

0.0436

0.0144

0.0648

0.3488

0.1224

0.0586

0,0362

0.0431

0.0597

0.2609

0.0600

0.3528

0.0547 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1496 49

बांगरोद निरन्तर ....

1494/1

1493

1484/1

1484/6

1509

1511

1512

1513

1514

565

0.0758

0.0857

0.0668

0.0792

0.1152

0.0038

0.0691

0.0640

0.0124

0.0452

0.0676

1514/1632

1523

745

712/2

711

709/1

709/2

709/3

709/4

709/5

0.3112

0.0283

0.0162

0.1735

0.0360

0.0372

0.0358

0.0368

0.0504

0.0288

708/1616/1

0.0648

708/1616/2

708/2

706/2

707/2

707/3

703

702

0.3221

0.0013

0.1800

0.1812

0.2198

0.1015

[फा. सं. आर-25011/2/2006- ओ.आर.- 1 ] एस . के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 13th January , 2006

S. O. 252. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is Necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Madhya Pradesh, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited .

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( I ) of section 3 of the petroleum and Mineral pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

566

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)] object in writing to the laying of pipeline under the land to Mr. Bharat Lal Nanama , competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office A- 15 , Sundervan , kasturba Nagar , Near Sumangal Garden , Ratlam --- 457001 , (Madhya Pradesh ) .

Schedule Tehsil :- Ratlam

District:- Ratlam SL . NO .

SURVEY NO

Name of Village

3 1

111

Dhabaipara

67/1

10/1 / 1 /A

10/13

10/1/1/10

10/1/2/45

10/1/1/4

10/1/3

10/1/4

10/1/5

10/1/6

10/1/7

10/1/8

10/1/9

10/1/10

10/1/1/53/2

13/4

11 41

Rajpura

2/1/9

2/12

2/4/1 42

145

Sawaliyarundi

19/1/1

100/2

101/4

101/3

143

102/1/2

102/1/1/2

102/1/1/1

103 State: -Madhyapradesh Area in Hectore

ARE

0.0072

0.1485

0.1080

0.2658

0.6120

0.2103

0.0013

0.1903

0.0088

0.2310

0.2884

0.1296

0.0171

0.0828

0.1271

0.1190

0.1196

0.1253

0.1129

0.1202

0.1414

0.0038

0.7135

0.2245

0.0181

0.2166

0.0120

0.2808

0.2160

1.0800

0.0421

1.0337

0.0175

0.1983

0.0036

0.1917

0.0783

0.0032

0.1409

0.0735

0.3863 567

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21, 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

104/3 42

Sawaliyarundi Conte..

104/2

104/1

109

110

112

113/1

113/3

113/2

68/2

68/1

62/1 43

Sarwanikhurd

223

225

224

226

298

293

295

294

291

136

245

246

134

118

119

117

115

116

74/1

74/2 44

Bibdod

479

487

486/2

480

495 0.0084

0.2228

0.0226

0.1059

0.0796

0.1452

0.0422

0.0819

0.0463

0.3249

0.1127

0.1867

0.0137

0.2664

0.0083

0.2032

0.2577

0.0882

0.0112

0.1558

0.0102

0.0801

0.0499

0.0186

0.1485

0.0121

0.0051

0.1135

0.0181

0.0459

0.1390

0.0788

0.0832

0.0985

0.1296

0.3084

0.0978

0.3768

0.1875

0.1226

0.0886

0.0430

0.3437

0.0163

0.0397 568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

498

Bibdod Conte ...

496

497

501

499/1

500

454

455

457

456

458

466/1/1

464

209/1

38/1/5 45

Julwaniya

38/1/1

44/1

43/2

59/2

26/3

26/1

66/4

66/3

67/2/1

67/2/2

79/1

77/1

106

107

108

110

102/6 [PART II - SEC. 3 (ii) ] 0.0861

0.0072

0.0814

0.0819

0.0290

0.0107

0.0688

0.0379

0.0096

0.1011

0.2491

0.6689

0.0228

0.4735

0.0951

2.2328

0.1562

0.6321

0.0015

0.2002

0.0021

0.0852

0.0047

0.3796

0.0407

0.0472

0.0122

0.1080

0.1859

0.1728

0.0948

0.0559

0.1224

0.1618

0.0396

0.0676

0.2114

0.0825

0.0090

0.0549

0.0546

0.0012

0.3604

0.0891

0.1773 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 1

3 45

105

Julwaniya Conte...

114

136

134

126

167

147

149

164

163/1

151

162

156

157

153/1

155/1

155/2

153/2

154 46

Nandalai

239 47

136/2

Banjali

136/1/1/1

50/1

46/1

46/2

48/1

270/1

269/1/1

272

273/1

314/1

311/1

310

311/2

309/2

304

303 48

308/1

Sejawata

307

569 0.1765

0.1856

0.3667

0.1728

0.2423

0.1856

0.0910

0.2448

0.0137

0.0843

0.1309

0.0014

0.0854

0.0993

0.0403

0.0352

0.0870

0.0150

0.0645

0.1946

0.1008

0.0250

1.0368

0.1040

0.0417

0.9360

0.0094

0.4186

0.0260

0.0939

0.0607

0.0266

0.1867

0.0377

0.0996

0.2336

0.5897

0.2407

0.1152

0.1413

0.1240

0.0998

0.0849

0.2042

0.0483 570

[PART 11 ---SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1 , 1927

0.0335

309

Sejawata Conte ...

306/2

0.1998

0.1368

305

0.0698

312/1

0.1071

304/1

314/2

0.0413

0.0870

304/2

0.1368

297/1

0.2279

297/2

0.0312

296/2

292/2

0.1956

0.0646

292/3

0.0279

292/4

0.0092

292/1

0.1011

293/4

0.0234

293/3

0.2282

26/1

0.0410

0.0806

0.0656

27/1

27/2

0.1644

0.3971

30/5

0.1052

0.0673

31/1

0.2548

0.0180

0.0933

45/1

0.1418

0.0919

0.0338

49/1

0.0573

0.0713

81/3

0.1941

81/4

0.2266

80/1

0.8709

80/11

0.0053

0.0495

131/8

0.0900

131/5

0.0864

131/10

0.0823

129

0.0139

128/3

0.0179

128/2

0.0355

128/7

0.3754

162/1

0.1687 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

162/2 48

Sejawata Conte ...

166/509/2

166/6

166/2

166/12

167

166/3/1

118/4

118/5

168/3

168/5

168/6

168/7

169/1

169/2

168/1

169/4

168/4

177/5

177/1

179

180/1

181/7

181/1

181/11

181/2

467 49

927/1

Bangrod

924/4

925/2

928/3

928/2

931/2

931/1

932/1

932/3

932/4

933

932/2

950

951

953

974/1

974/2

974/3

571 4

0.1943

0.0807

0.0792

0.1440

0.1293

0.0753

0.0108

0.0019

0.0489

0.1014

0.1022

0.0951

0.1110

0.0369

0.0478

0.1626

0.0808

0.2234

0.1867

0.0958

0.0199

0.1094

0.0055

0.2276

0.2525

0.0146

0.0388

0.0762

0.1520

0.2821

0.0896

0.2060

0.0672

0.1397

0.0540

0.2850

0.1656

0.0035

0.0504

0.0413

0.0775

0.0841

0.1008

0.1260

0.1080 572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927 1

974/4

Bangrod Conte ...

974/6

978

980

982/1

1038

977

1314

1259/1

1259/2

1259/3

1260

1259/4

1263

1264

1257

1235

1238

1214

1215

1216

1213/1

1213/2

1211/1

1209

1197

1195

1194

1192

1193

1347

1348

1402/1624

1402/3

1402/1

1402/2

1403/3

1404/3

1406

1277/1628

1441/1

1444

1438

1495 [ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 0.1692

0.2160

0.0969

0.1237

0.0054

0.0396

0.0133

0.0481

0.0612

0.0468

0.0360

0.1275

0.0720

0.0589

0.1628

0.0210

0.1387

0.0602

0.0886

0.0051

0.0442

0.0140

0.0014

0.0936

0.0868

0.0572

0.1123

0.0591

0.0247

0.0180

0.0146

0.0436

0.0144

0.0648

0.3488

0.1224

0.0586

0.0362

0.0431

0.0597

0.2609

0.0600

0.3528

0.0547 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1496 BangrodConte...

1494/1

1493

1484/1

1484/6

1509

1511

1512

1513

1514

1514/1632

1523

745

712/2

711

709/1

709/2

709/3

709/4

709/5

708/1616/1

708/1616/2

708/2

706/2

707/2

707/3

703

702

573 0.0758

0.0857

0.0668

0.0792

0.1152

0.0038

0.0691

0.0640

0.0124

0.0452

0.0676

0.3112

0.0283

0.0162

0.1735

0.0360

0.0372

0.0358

0.0368

0.0504

0.0288

0.0648

0.3221

0.0013

0.1800

0.1812

0.2198

0.1015

[F. No. R-25011/2/2006- O.R. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 253. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेटोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिएः

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए :

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार पेटोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है .

55GI/2006-12 574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii )] है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में भरत लाल ननामा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं ए-15, सुंदरवन कस्तुरबा नगर , सुमंगल गार्डन के पास रतलाम -457001 (मध्यप्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप मे आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूचि

तहसील थांदला

जिला - झाबुआ कमांक

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नम्बर

3 18

273

सेमलपाड़ा

274

277

278

279

280

281

243

242

234

232/1

232/2

233

228

226

215

216

217

218

219

220/1

220/2

213

177/2

176/1

176/2

134

181

182

183

190

188

186

185

168 22

गुलरीपाड़ा

राज्य- मध्य प्रदेश

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में

0.0281

0.0171

0.0791

0.0603

0.0008

0.0013

0.0534

0.1285

0.1642

0.0921

0.0148

0.0432

0.0625

0.0924

0.0185

0.1282

0.0317

0.0590

0.0723

0.0835

0.1180

0.0720

0.0570

0.4807

0.0080

0.0792

0.1425

0.0232

0.0079

0.1031

0.0013

0.0910

0.0250

0.0314

0.0977

0.1249

0.1060

0.0294

0.0504

0.1536 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 1

3 22

167 गुलरीपड़ा निरन्तर.....

175

176

173

177

178

179

180

181

182

198

364

199

346

345

344

343

336

335

334/2

334/1

333

332 23

पाटड़ी

69 24

499

सागवा

497/4

500/1

500/2

500/3

500/4

501

502/1

502/2

512

496

493

476

477

575 4

0.1819

0.0983

0.0797

0.0094

0.0752

0.1112

0.0011

0.1031

0.0541

0.0863

0.0127

0.2064

0.1758

0.0114

0.1619

0.1581

0.0631

0.0355

0.0169

0.1368

0.2428

0.2099

0.0393

0.2957

0.2347

0.2967

0.0018

0.4506

0.0167

0.0252

0.1555

0.2713

0.0550

0.0398

0.0368

0.0420

0.1118

0.2588

0.1167

0.1502

0.0405

0.0143

0.1868

0.1470

0.0819 576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

3 1

478 सागवा निरन्तर ......

451

438

439

444

440

441

431

424

423 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] 4

0.1136

0.0171

0.0109

0.1130

0.0799

0.1123

0.0230

0.0433

0.3573

0.2910

2.0196

आरक्षीत वन

1855

खवासा

1854

1832

1828

1829

1830

1831

1827

1675

1826

1821

1822

1823

1818

1796

1797

1798

1799

1800

1801

1791

1802

1768

1767

1222

1225

1226

1227

1228/1

1231

1232/3

1232/2

1232/1

1239 0.1612

0.0164

0.0065

0.0430

0.0354

0.0106

0.0010

0.1219

0.0648

0.1706

0.1266

0.1559

0.1175

0.1766

0.0606

0.0888

0.0019

0.0213

0.1130

0.0185

0.0331

0.0145

0.0573

0.1929

0.0143

0.1284

0.1894

0.0302

0.0437

0.0292

0.1396

0.1038

0.0014

0.0197 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 1

3 25

खवासा निरन्तर ......

1238

1241

1242

1244

1243

1236

1245

1246

1247

1249

1253

1257/1

1257/2

1176

1161/2

1160

1162

1163

1169

1164

1067

1061

1060

1065

980

982

979

978 26

नारेला

479

481

480

482

483

478

471

472

451

577 4

0.0643

0.0570

0.0511

0.0142

0.0361

0.0011

0.0024

0.0614

0.0207

0.1213

0.1332

0.3528

0.3024

0.0597

0.5616

0.2452

0.1584

0.0117

0.5738

0.0648

0.0025

0.0028

0.0792

0.2736

0.0468

0.6120

0.1080

0.0096

1.1067

0.0939

0.0012

0.1362

0.0030

0.1260

0.0252

0.1189

0.0108

0.1989

0.0527

0.1362

0.0015

0.0011

0.1520

0.0603

0.0484 5/8

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ) 1

नारेला निरन्तर.........

0.0308

0.2025

0.1093

0.0044

0.0213

0.0710

0.0088

0.0011

0.0468

0.0417

0.0012

0.0168

0.0058

0.0654

339

0.0608

147

0.1089

0.0078

152

151

0.1295

0.0014

150

0.0016

148

149

0.0994

158

0.0182

159

0.1080

142

0.0013

160

0.0214

168

0.0162

140

0.0786

172

0.0194

0.0277

173

174

0.0095

179

0.0021

0.1317

178

180

0.0130

187

0.1080

186

0.0792

188

0.0648

960

0.0549

सेमलिया

961

0.0138

962

0.1122

0.2152

965/2

0.1118

965/1

0.0017

966

0.0183

974

0.0123

922

979

0.1310 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/ माघ 1 ; 1927 1

3 27

978 सेमलिया निरन्तर......

977

976

986

1002

1009 P.

1996

1995

1993

1997

1998

1999

1990

2003

1987 28

222

भेरुगढ़

219

218

217

216

211

102

176 29

रुक्मणीपाड़ा

128

129

132

133

134

136

143

579 4

0.0148

0.2402

0.1980

0.1652

0.0372

0.1334

0.2502

0.2012

0.0071

0.1574

0.0833

0.0635

0.4903

0.0280

0.0935

0.1236

0.0767

0.0127

0.1653

0.0373

0.0011

0.0796

0.0926

0.0310

0.0153

0.1254

0.0718

0.1173

0.1798

0.0821

0.0841

0.0625

0.0244

0.0205

0.0278

0.0151

0.0578

0.0499

0.0760

0.0185

0.1170

0.0814

0.1197

0.0757

0.0121 580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

3 1

142 29

रुक्मणीपाड़ा निरन्तर......

140

141

139

123

102 30

चरपोटी पाड़ा

100

101

211 31

नहारपुरा

234

235

236

229

230

228/1

292

291

290

294

293

305/2

305/1

208

143/1

143/2

207 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

0.1085

0.1402

0.0133

0.0547

0.0341

0.1960

0.0602

0.0791

0.0020

0.0739

0.0279

0.0965

0.0249

0.0025

0.1258

0.0865

0.1381

0.0191

0.0272

0.0317

0.0209

0.0629

0.0599

0.0579

0.0274

0.0771

0.0065

0.0228

0.0878

0.1056

0.2588

0.1613

0.0012

0.2532

0.0191

0.1315

0.0078

0.1249

0.0403

0.0628

0.0614

0.0220

0.1372

0.0773

0.0694 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 31

206 नहारपुरा निरन्तर.......

199

200

201/1

201/2

202

198

196

148

195

189/1

189/2

189/3

194

190

187

186

185

178/1

171/1

170

168

167

166

163

162

161

366

367

364/2

365

408

410

411

412/1

412/2

413

414

882

468

469

495

481/2

478

480

479 55 G1/ 2006-13

581 4

0.0860

0.0791

0.1274

0.0634

0.0555

0.0382

0.0317

0.0196

0.0232

0.0048

0.0344

0.0108

0.0011

0.0389

0.0437

0.1003

0.0011

0.2145

0.0656

0.1142

0.0741

0.0510

0.0012

0.0252

0.1343

0.0980

0.1254

0.2715

0.0093

0.0030

0.0612

0.1005

0.1875

0.1555

0.0602

0.0910

0.0490

0.1267

0.0025

0.0219

0.4163

0.0238

0.1897

0.1111

0.0536

0.0851 582

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

477

0.0565 नहारपुरा निरन्तर.......

545

0.0018

546

0.1611

540

0.0706

541

0.1222

524

0.1075

525

0.0207

527/1

0.0752

527/2

0.0497

528

0.0738

529

0.0636

530

0.0677

522

0.1351

570

0.1954

[फा. सं. आर-25011/ 1/2006- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 13th January, 2006

S. O. 253. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is Necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited .

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( I) of section 3 of the petroleum and Mineral pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification; issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public object in writing to the laying of pipeline under the land to Mr. Bharat Lal Nanama , competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at office A- 15 , Sundervan , kasturba Nagar , Near Sumangal Garden , Ratlam - 457001 , (Madhya Pradesh ) .

583 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Schedule

SI No. Tehsil : - Thandla District :- Jhabua State: -Madhyapradesh

AREA

SURVEY NO

Nameof Village

AreIn Hectore 2

273

0.0281

Semalpara

274

0.0171

277

0.0791

278

0.0603

0.0008

279

280

0.0013

281

0.0534

243

0.1285

242

0.1642

234

0.0921

232/1

0.0148

232/2

0.0432

233

0.0625

228

0.0924

226

0.0185

215

0.1282

216

0.0317

217

0.0590

218

0.0723

219

0.0835

220/1

0.1180

0.0720

220/2

213

0.0570

177/2

0.4807

176/1

0.0080

176/2

0.0792

134

0.1425

0.0232

0.0079

0.1031

0.0013

181

0.0910

182

0.0250

183

0.0314

0.0977

190

188

0.1249

186

0.1060

185

0.0294

0.0504

168

0.1536

Gularipura 584

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

167

0.1819

Gularipura Conte.

0.0983

175

176

0.0797

173

0.0094

177

0.0752

0.1112

178

0.0011

179

180

0.1031

181

0.0541

182

0.0863

0.0127

198

364

0.2064

0.1758

199

346

0.0114

345

0.1619

0.1581

344

343

0.0631

336

0.0355

335

0.0169

334/2

0.1368

0.2428

334/1

0.2099

333

332

0.0393

0.2957

Patadi

0.2347

0.2967

0.0018

0.4506

0.0167

0.0252

0.1555

0.2713

499

Sagwa

0.0550

497/4

0.0398

500/1

500/2

0.0368

0.0420

500/3

500/4

0.1118

501

0.2588

502/1

0.1167

502/2

0.1502

512

0.0405

0.0143

496

0.1868

493

0.1470

476

477

0.0819 585 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

478

0.1136

Sagwa conte ..

451

0.0171

438

0.0109

439

0.1130

444

0.0799

440

0.1123

0.0230

441

0.0433

431

424

0.3573

423

0.2910

R. F.

2.0196

Khawasa

1855

0.1612

0.0164

1854

1832

0.0065

1828

0.0430

1829

0.0354

1830

0.0106

1831

0.0010

1827

0.1219

1675

0.0648

1826

0.1706

1821

0.1266

1822

0.1559

0.1175

1823

1818

0.1766

1796

0.0606

1797

0.0888

0.0019

1798

0.0213

1799

1800

0.1130

1801

0.0185

1791

0.0331

1802

0.0145

0.0573

1768

1767

0.1929

0.0143

1222

1225

0.1284

1226

0.1894

1227

0.0302

1228/1

0.0437

1231

0.0292

1232/3

0.1396

0.1038

1232/2

1232/1

0.0014

1239

0.0197 586

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1 , 1927

3 25

1238 Khawasa Conte ...

1241

1242

1244

1243

1236

1245

1246

1247

1249

1253

1257/1

1257/2

1176

1161/2

1160

1162

1163

1169

1164

1067

1061

1060

1065

980

982

979

978 26

Narela

479

481

480

482

483

478

471

472

451

66 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

0.0643

0.0570

0.0511

0.0142

0.0361

0.0011

0.0024

0.0614

0.0207

0.1213

0.1332

0.3528

0.3024

0.0597

0.5616

0.2452

0.1584

0.0117

0.5738

0.0648

0.0025

0.0028

0.0792

0.2736

0.0468

0.6120

0.1080

0.0096

1.1067

0.0939

0.0012

0.1362

0.0030

0.1260

0.0252

0.1189

0.0108

0.1989

0.0527

0.1362

0.0015

0.0011

0.1520

0,0603

0.0484 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 26

65 Narela Conte..

339

147

152

151

150

148

149

158

159

142

160

168

140

172

173

174

179

178

180

187

186

188 27

960

Semliya

961

962

965/2

965/1

966

974

922

979

587 4

0.0308

0.2025

0.1093

0.0044

0.0213

0.0710

0.0088

0.0011

0.0468

0.0417

0.0012

0.0168

0.0058

0.0654

0.0608

0.1089

0.0078

0.1295

0.0014

0.0016

0.0994

0.0182

0.1080

0:0013

0.0214

0.0162

0.0786

0.0194

0.0277

0.0095

0.0021

0.1317

0.0130

0.1080

0.0792

0.0648

0.0549

0.0138

0.1122

0.2152

0.1118

0.0017

0.0183

0.0123

0.1310 588

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 2

978

0.0148

Semliya Conte ..

977

0.2402

976

0.1980

986

0.1652

1002

0.0372

1009 P

0.1334

0.2502

1996

0.2012

1995

0.0071

1993

0.1574

1997

0.0833

1998

1999

0.0635

0.4903

1990

2003

0.0280

1987

0.0935

0.1236

222

Bherugarh

0.0767

219

0.0127

218

217

0.1653

216

0.0373

0.0011

211

0.0796

0.0926

0.0310

102

0.0153

0.1254

0.0718

0.1173

0.1798

0.0821

0.0841

0.0625

0.0244

0.0205

0.0278

0.0151

0.0578

176

0.0499

Rukmanipara

0.0760

128

0.0185

129

132

0.1170

133

0.0814

134

0.1197

0.0757

136

143

0.0121 589 [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

142

0.1085

Rukmanipara Con ..

0.1402

140

141

0.0133

0.0547

139

123

0.0341

0.1960

0.0602

0.0791

0.0020

0.0739

0.0279

0.0965

0.0249

0.0025

0.1258

0.0865

0.1381

0.0191

0.0272

102

0.0317

Charpotipara

0.0209

0.0629

0.0599

0.0579

0.0274

100

0.0771

101

0.0065

0.0228

211

Naharpura

0.0878

234

235

0.1056

236

0.2588

229

0.1613

230

0.0012

0.2532

228/1

292

0.0191

291

0.1315

0.0078

290

294

0.1249

0.0403

293

305/2

0.0628

305/1

0.0614

208

0.0220

0.1372

143/1

143/2

0.0773

207

0.0694

55 G1/2006-14 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 590

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

206

0.0860

Naharpura Conte ..

0.0791

199

0.1274

200

0.0634

201/1

0.0555

201/2

0.0382

202

0.0317

198

0.0196

196

0.0232

148

0.0048

195

0.0344

189/1

0.0108

189/2

0.0011

189/3

194

0.0389

0.0437

190

0.1003

187

0.0011

186

185

0.2145

178/1

0.0656

0.1142

171/1

0.0741

170

168

0.0510

167

0.0012

166

0.0252

163

0.1343

162

0.0980

161

0.1254

366

0.2715

367

0.0093

364/2

0.0030

365

0.0612

0.1005

408

410

0.1875

411

0.1555

0.0602

412/1

412/2

0.0910

413

0.0490

0.1267

414

882

0.0025

468

0.0219

469

0.4163

495

0.0238

481/2

0.1897

0.1111

478

480

0.0536

0.0851

479 591 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

477

0.0565 Naharpura Conte ..

545

0.0018

546

0.1611

0.0706

540

541

0.1222

0.1075

524

0.0207

525

0.0752

527/1

0.0497

527/2

0.0738

528

529

0.0636

530

0.0677

522

0.1351

570

0.1954

[F. No. R- 25011/1 / 2006-0.R. - 1 ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 254.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेटोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिएः और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए :

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार पेटोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है.

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमिं मे हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, ईक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में भरत लाल ननामा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं ए-15, सुंदरवन कस्तुरबा नगर सुमंगल गार्डन के पास रतलाम -457001 (मध्यप्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप मे आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा । 592

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1, 1927 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )]

अनुसूचि

तहसील-मेधनगर

राज्य- मध्य प्रदेश

जिला

झाबुआ

कमांक

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नम्बर

ढाढनिया

101

174

176

175

194/1

194/2

193

192/1

190/1

190/3

186

187 क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में

0.1821

0.1160

0.2746

0.0455

0.0108

0.0239

0.2340

0.0825

0.0513

0.0594

0.0331

0.1842

0.0366

0.1144

0.1512

0.0768

0.1531

0.0068

0.0005

0.1712

0.0303

0.0050

0.1461

0.0076

0.0028

0.2850

0.0018

0.2279

0.0159

0.0822

0.2470

0.0975

0.0540

0.2304

0.0760

0.1390

0.0417

आरक्षित वन

112/2 जामनिया

119

118/1

114

0.1728

0.0461

0.0360

0.2404

0.2882 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

110 2

जामनिया निरन्तर........

107

105

102

100

101

127

126

128

130

132/1

131

91/1

136

135

137 3

107

नाहरपुरा

108

109

104

110

112

113

103

48 4

फुलेडी

52/4

593 0.0300

0.0003

0.1254

0.0313

0.0164

0.0465

0.0632

0.0003

0.2767

0.0803

0.0359

0.0074

0.0285

0.2020

0.0425

0.0510

0.0583

0.2526

0.0650

0.0483

0.2085

0.2162

0.0227

0.0220

0.0626

0.4184

0.0067

0.0238

0.1770

0.0906

0.2097

0.1499

0.0228

0.1631

0.2855

0.0880

0.0144

0.0914

0.0860

0.3246

0.0164

0.0443

0.1632

0.0006

0.0704

0.0394 594

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

70 4

फुलेडी निरन्तर......

111

112

113

115

114

117

256

255

257

259

260

262

263

268

267

269

250/1

250/2

250/3

250/4

249/3

249/2

248

247

234

235

243

245

244

246

242 5

183

मेधनगर

185/1

185/3

180

175

176

173 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

0.0144

0.0209

0.1168

0.1156

0.1848

0.1066

0.0003

0.0119

0.1046

0.1561

0.1052

0.0214

0.0291

0.1044

0.1841

0.1083

0.0296

0.0557

0.1560

0.3328

0.2037

0.0852

0.0059

0.0822

0.0677

0.0565

0.1153

0.4748

0.0669

0.2052

0.0410

0.4884

0.1326

0.0309

0.0185

0.0525

0.0971

0.1188

0.0045

0.3916

0.0227

0.1094

0.0536

0.0594

0.1002

0.1585 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

3 1

171/1 5

मेधनगर निरन्तर......

171/2

170/2/2

171/3

170/2/3

170/1

164

151/2

151/1

153

154/1

156

155

27/2

27/3

24/2

7/2

7/3

7/4/3

8/2

8/1P

8/1/2P

8/1 /1P

508 6

552

बेड़ावली

596

597/1

592

591

598/2P

590

586

585/4P.

583(1to 14 P. )

601

607

606/1P

606/2P.

595 0.0698

0.1493

0.0977

0.0013

0.0024

0.0965

0.2975

0.1793

0.0128

0.0197

0.0028

0.0822

0.0711

0.0335

0.2061

0.0055

0.0302

0.0501

0.0547

0.0936

0.0860

0.0137

0.0093

0.0050

0.0909

0.1185

0.0194

0.0216

0.0720

0.0468

0.0090

0.7914

0.0187

0.0829

0.0847

0.01533

0.0048

0.1115

0.0306

0.1839

0.0013

0.0468

0.0467

0.3306

0.0792

0.0604 596

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

3 1

605/ P 6

बेडावली निरन्तर......

604/2

604/5

619

618/2

622

623/3P.

623/2P

624

626

627

628

631

629

630

238 7

फुटतलाब

237

236

235

234/2

234/4

234/3

233

213/7

213/6

213/5

232

231

230

227

223/1

223/2

221

220

219/2

219/3

219/4

197

80 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

0.3280

0.1519

0.1110

0.0741

0.0601

0.2010

0.0623

0.0022

0.0986

0.0167

0.0101

0.0130

0.0013

0.1785

0.0687

0.0306

0.0588

0.1539

0.0196

0.0864

0.0711

0.0452

0.0371

0.0669

0.0624

0.0225

0.0656

0.1413

0.0101

0.1867

0.0507

0.2016

0.1112

0.0484

0.1872

0.0109

0.1856

0.1231

0.0189

0.0177

0.0795

0.0744

0.0693

0.4108

0.0096

0.1826 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

3 1

61/2 7

फुटतलाब निरन्तर.......

191 8

गुजरपाडा

256

254

255

245

244

243

239/1

236/1

236/2

235/2

235/1

229/2

229/1

230/2

230/1

228

227

226

225

224/3

224/2

223

58 9

सजेली जोखनी सात

49/2

70 55 G1 /2006-15

597 4

0.0637

0.0927

0.1799

0.0448

0.1253

0.0111

0.0401

0.0274

0.1202

0.4626

0.2717

0.0333

0.0378

0.2701

0.1056

0.0435

0.0241

0.1749

0.0162

0.0831

0.0815

0.1165

0.0864

0.0912

0.1261

0.0261

0.0054

0.0591

0.0402

0.0306

0.0242

0.0361

0.0054

0.0864

0.0133

0.0134

0.1406

0:0194

0.1608

0.1802

0.1718

0.0490

0.1647

0.0216

0.0606

0.0227 598

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

144 10

सजेली मालजी सात

140

141

147

148/2

150

149

159

259

256

257

262

263

226

227

225

224

223

219

218

217

216

55 11

सजेली नरसिहपुरा

52/15

52/16

43/2

43/3

43/1

36/3

36/4

27/3

27/2

27/1

29/1

12 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

0.0222

0.0599

0.0153

0.0152

0.0652

0.0419

0.1207

0.0184

0.2709

0.1080

0.1368

0.2426

0.0001

0.0136

0.0093

0.0608

0.1319

0.0929

0.0021

0.1062

0.0927

0.0058

0.0562

0.0445

0.0271

0.0186

0.1108

0.1603

0.0583

0.0753

0.0820

0.0030

0.0820

0.0401

0.0919

0.1120

0.0068

0.0507

0.0380

0.0210

0.0014

0.0871

0.0415

0.1217

0.1243

0.0246

0.0015 भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

15 11 सजेली नरसिहपुरा निर..

277 12

सजेली दामना सात

307

309

1175 13

नौगांवा

1181

1182

1183

1184

1186

1198

1197

1196

1195

1193

1194/3

1194/2

1194/1

1247

1246

1249

1245

1274

1226

1227

1228

1229

1242

1243

1279

1278

1277

1276

1275

1273

1272

1271

1268

1291

126/

1266

1299/1

1299/2

1265

982

599 4

0.0720

0.0345

0.0321

0.0009

0.1416

0.0197

0.1114

0.0058

0.0510

0.0494

0.0683

0.0001

0.0077

0.0098

0.0626

0.0031

0.0295

0.0907

0.0897

0.0164

0.1202

0.0014

0.0540

0.1299

0.0013

0.0043

0.0060

0.0052

0.0091

0.0131

0.0150

0.0694

0.0259

0.0285

0.0890

0.0670

0.0141

0.0090

0.0562

0.055/

0.0760

0.0147

0.0015

0.0858 600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

नौगांवा निरन्मर......

1301

1302

978

979

980

981

985

945

944

943/4

943/3

943/2

943/1

942

956

921

888

889

890

891

892

893

894

895

896

897

898

899

902

901/2

874

875

873

843

844

845

846

847

848

849

850

851/3

816/2

814/3

814/2

814/1 [PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

0.0442

0.0983

0.0225

0.0418

0.0177

0.0242

0.0026

0.1647

0.0759

0.0283

0.0137

0.0166

0.0156

0.0905

0.0091

0.0198

0.0299

0.0285

0.0255

0.0242

0.0248

0.0107

0.0051

0.0045

0.0069

0.0076

0.0060

0.0082

0.0054

0.0096

0.0814

0.0587

0.0420

0.0179

0.0322

0.0369

0.0491

0.0114

0.0876

0.0843

0.0352

0.0040

0.0058

0.1694

0.0408

0.0542 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

813 13

नौगांवा निरन्तर.....

812

810

809

808

806

570

505

504

508

517

518/1

518/2

519

240

520

239

230/2

230/1

229

228

227/2

222

221

216

196

198

197

201

200

203

202

204

378

205 14

गुडा छोटा

16/2

16/3

18/3

601 4

0.0418

0.0743

0.0280

0.0189

0.0755

0.0190

0.0460

0.0756

0.0749

0.0313

0.0981

0.0699

0.1016

0.0015

0.0754

0.0588

0.1066

0.1224

0.3038

0.0190

0.0159

0.1067

0.0193

0.2480

0.0274

0.1684

0.0558

0.0469

0.0735

0.1496

0.0053

0.1009

0.0199

0.1185

0.0334

0.1153

0.0110

0.0150

0.0953

0.1457

0.1593

0.4192

0.0156

0.1272

0.0248

0.0517 602

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

1 14

गुडा छोटा निरन्तर..

174 15

महुड़ा

172

169

170

171

168

165

176

178

182

181/2

181/1

180/2

180/1

189

191

192

194

195

198

199

200

201

163

84/1

84/2

76/1

76/2

206

210

211

213

214

215

216

217/1

205

219 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

0.0235

0.0688

0.2052

0.0078

0.2112

0.0035

0.0135

0.1174

0.1102

0.0130

0.0246

0.0504

0.0012

0.1274

0.0091

0.2163

0.1475

0.0159

0.0232

0.0110

0.0695

0.0955

0.0737

0.0261

0.0449

0.1408

0.0854

0.1373

0.0432

0.0360

0.0333

0.1058

0.0601

0.0672

0.0113

0.1177

0.0030

0.0463

0.0152

0.1075

0.0174

0.2316

0.2499

0.0317 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

218/2 15

महुड़ा निरन्तर....

220

221/1

467/2

468

469

478

479

480

488

489

92 16

शिवगड

130

131

156

157

162

163

164

165

166

18 17

गणेशपुरा

24/1

24/2

24/3

24/4

24/5

7 19

कुंडला

9/1

603 4

0.0092

0.1310

0.1523

0.2239

0.0741

0.1821

0.0456

0.0098

0.0817

0.2603

0.0835

0.2232

0.0252

0.1296

0.0648

0.1080

0.0432

0.0828

0.0072

0.0080

0.0260

0.0846

0.1679

0.0042

0.0247

0.0570

0.0789

0.0507

0.0641

0.0668

0.0137

0.1704

0.0366

0.0318

0.2054

0.1233

0.0921

0.0147

0.1068

0.0303

0.0648

0.0019

0.1854

0.0342

0.0055

0.0025

0.0360 604

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

3 1

18 19

कुंडला निरन्मर.....

36 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

0.1532

0.0201

0.0036

0.1109

0.0040

0.0257

0.0617

0:0617

5.0688

आरक्षित वन

417 20

पंचपिपलिया

416

327

415

414

328/2

331/3

333/2

331/1

411

410

334/2

335/3

335/4

336/4

336/5

338/1

408

396

395

394

393

392

391

361

390

362

363/2

363/1

363/3

367

368

369

370 0.0098

0.1178

0.1041

0.0031

0.0072

0.0973

0.0888

0.0720

0.0611

0.0128

0.0014

0.1160

0.0433

0.1040

0.1204

0.0041

0.2533

0.0912

0.0269

0.0268

0.0996

0.0472

0.0449

0.0984

0.0559

0.0647

0.0516

0.2341

0.0055

0.1539

0.1441

0.0188

0.1482

0.0181

1.3752

आरक्षित वन

347 21

जामदा

353

352 0.0607

0.0184

0.2084 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

605

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

4 21

जामदा निरन्तर.....

359

0.0279

360

0.0949

364

0.0011

343

0.0011

365

0.0017

366

0.0925

370

0.1674

371

0.0320

368

0.0397

336

0.1607

310

0.0669

309

0.3247

299

0,2329

300

0.0252

आरक्षित वन

2,5344

[फा. सं. आर-25011/1 / 2006- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 13th January, 2006

S. O. 254. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is Necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited .

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( I ) of section 3 of the petroleum and Mineral pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of user in land) Act , 1962( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of this notification; issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public object in writing to the laying of pipeline under the land to Mr. Bharat Lal Nanama , competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office A- 15 , Sundervan , kasturba Nagar , Near Sumangal Garden , Ratlam - 457001 , (Madhya Pradesh ) .

55G1/2006-16 606

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Schedule

District: - Jhabua

SI No.

State:- Madhrapradesh Tehsil:- Meghnagar

SURVEY NO

AREA

Nameof Village

Area in Hectore

0.1821

Dadhaniya

0.1160

0.2746

0.0455

0.0108

101

0.0239

0.2340

0.0825

0.0513

0.0594

0.0331

0.1842

0.0366

0.1144

0.1512

0.0768

0.1531

0.0068

0.0005

0.1712

0.0303

0.0050

0.1461

0.0076

0.0028

0.2850

174

0.0018

176

0.2279

175

0.0159

0.0822

194/1

194/2

0.2470

193

0.0975

0.0540

192/1

190/1

0.2304

0.0760

190/3

186

0.1390

187

0.0417

0.1728

R.F

112/2

0.0461

Jamniya

119

0.0360

118/1

0.2404

114

0.2882 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

110

Jamniya Cont...

107

105

102

100

101

127

126

128

130

132/1

131

91/1

136

135

137

107 3

Naharpura

108

109

104

110

112

113

103

48 4

Phuledi

52/4

607 4

0.0360

0.0603

0.1254

0.0313

0.0164

0.0465

0.0632

0.0003

0.2767

0.0803

0.0359

0.0074

0.0285

0.2020

0.0425

0.0510

0.0583

0.2526

0.0650

0.0483

0.2085

0.2162

0.022.7

0.0220

0.0626

0.4184

0.0067

0.0238

0.1770

0.0906

0.2097

0.1499

0.0228

0.1631

0.2855

0.0880

0.0144

0.0914

0.0860

0.3246

0.0164

0.0443

0.1632

0.0006

0.0704

0.0394 608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

Phuledi Cont ....

111

112

113

115

114

117

256

255

257

259

260

262

263

268

267

269

250/1

250/2

250/3

250/4

249/3

249/2

248

247

234

235

243

245

244

246

242

183 5

Meghanagar

185/1

185/3

180

175

176

173 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

0.0144

0.0209

0.1168

0.1156

0.1848

0.1066

0.0003

0.0119

0.1046

0.1561

0.1052

0.0214

0.0291

0.1044

0.1841

0.1083

0.0296

0.0557

0.1560

0.3328

0.2037

0.0852

0.0059

0.0822

0.0677

0.0565

0.1153

0.4748

0.0669

0.2052

0.0410

0.4884

0.1326

0.0309

0.0185

0.0525

0.0971

0.1188

0.0045

0.3916

0.0227

0.1094

0.0536

0.0594

0.1002

0.1585 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

171/1 5

Meghanagar Cont ...

171/2

170/2/2

171/3

170/2/3

170/1

164

151/2

151/1

153

154/1

156

155

27/2

27/3

24/2

7/2

7/3

7/4/3

8/2

8/1P

8/1/2P

8/1/1P

508

Bedawali

552 6

596

597/1

592

591

598/2P.

590

586

585/4P.

583(1to 14 P. )

601

607

606/1P.

606/2P.

609 4

0.0698

0.1493

0.0977

0.0013

0.0024

0.0965

0.2975

0.1793

0.0128

0.0197

0.0028

0.0822

0.0711

0.0335

0.2061

0.0055

0.0302

0.0501

0.0547

0.0936

0.0860

0.0137

0.0093

0.0050

0.0909

0.1185

0.0194

0.0216

0.0720

0.0468

0.0090

0.7914

0.0187

0.0829

0.0847

0.01533

0.0048

0.1115

0.0306

0.1839

0.0013

0.0468

0.0467

0.3306

0.0792

0.0604 610

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

0.3280

605/P

Bedawali Cont ....

0.1519

604/2

0.1110

604/5

0.0741

619

0.0601

618/2

0.2010

622

0.0623

623/3P.

0.0022

623/2P .

624

0.0986

626

0.0167

627

0.0101

0.0130

628

0.0013

631

0.1785

629

630

0.0687

0.0306

238

Foot-talab

0.0588

237

0.1589

236

235

0.0196

234/2

0.1316

234/3

0.0280

0.0832

234/4

233

0.0371

213/7

0.0669

0.0624

213/6

0.0225

213/5

232

0.0656

231

0.1413

0.0101

230

227

0.1867

0.0507

223/1

0.2016

223/2

0.1112

0.0484

221

0.1872

220

0.0109

219/2

0.1856

219/3

0.1231

219/4

0.0189

197

0.0177

0.0795

0.0744

0.0693

0.4108

0.0096

0.1826

80 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/ माघ 1 , 1927 1

3 7

61/2

Foot-talab Cont ...

15 8

191

Gujarpara

256

254

255

245

244

243

239/1

236/1

236/2

235/2

235/1

229/2

229/1

230/2

230/1

228

227

226

225

224/3

224/2

223 9

Sajeli Jokhni Sat

49/2

611 4

0.0637

0.0927

0.1799

0.0448

0.1253

0.0111

0.0401

0.0274

0.1202

0.4626

0.2717

0.0333

0.0378

0.2701

0.1056

0.0435

0.0241

0.1749

0.0162

0.0831

0.0815

0.1165

0.0864

0.0912

0.1261

0.0261

0.0054

0.0591

0.0402

0.0306

0.0242

0.0361

0.0054

0.0864

0.0133

0.0134

0.1406

0.0194

0.1608

0.1802

0.1718

0.0490

0.1647

0.0216

0.0606

0.0227 612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

144

Sajeli Malji Sat

140

141

147

148/2

150

149

159

259

256

257

262

263

226

227

225

224

223

219

218

217

216 11

Sajeli Narsinghpura

52/15

52/16

43/2

43/3

43/1

36/3

36/4

27/3

27/2

27/1

29/1

12 [ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

0.0222

0.0599

0.0153

0.0152

0.0652

0.0419

0.1207

0.0184

0.2709

0.1080

0.1368

0.2426

0.0001

0.0136

0.0093

0.0608

0.1319

0.0929

0.0021

0.1062

0.0927

0.0058

0.0562

0.0445

0.0271

0.0186

0.1108

0.1603

0.0583

0.0753

0.0820

0.0030

0.0820

0.0401

0.0919

0.1120

0.0068

0.0507

0.0380

0.0210

0.0014

0.0871

0.0415

0.1217

0.1243

0.0246

0.0015 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 11

15 Sajeli NarsinghpuraCon ..

2 12

277

Sajeli Damna Sat

307

309 13

1175

Naugawa

1181

1182

1183

1184

1186

1198

1197

1196

1195

1193

1194/3

1194/2

1194/1

1247

1246

1249

1245

1274

1226

1227

1228

1229

1242

1243

1279

1278

1277

1276

1275

1273

1272

1271

1268

1291

1267

1266

1299/1

1299/2

1265

982 55 GI/ 2006-17

613 4

0.0720

0.0345

0.0321

0.0009

0.1416

0.0197

0.1114

0.0058

0.0510

0.0494

0.0683

0.0001

0.0077

0.0098

0.0626

0.0031

0.0295

0.0907

0.0897

0.0164

0.1202

0.0014

0.0540

0.1299

0.0013

0.0043

0.0060

0.0052

0.0091

0.0131

0.0150

0.0694

0.0259

0.0285

0.0890

0.0670

0.0141

0.0090

0.0562

0.0557

0.0760

0.0147

0.0015

0.0858 614

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

1301

Naugawa Conte ...

1302

978

979

980

981

985

945

944

943/4

943/3

943/2

943/1

942

956

921

888

889

890

891

892

893

894

895

896

897

898

899

902

901/2

874

875

873

843

844

845

846

847

848

849

850

851/3

816/2

814/3

814/2

814/1

813

812

810

809

808 [ PART I - SEC. 3 (ii ) | 4

0.0442

0.0983

0.0225

0.0418

0.0177

0.0242

0.0026

0.1647

0.0759

0.0283

0.0137

0.0166

0.0156

0.0905

0.0091

0.0198

0.0299

0.0285

0.0255

0.0242

0.0248

0.0107

0.0051

0.0045

0.0069

0.0076

0.0060

0.0082

0.0054

0.0096

0.0814

0.0587

0.0420

0.0179

0.0322

0.0369

0.0491

0.0114

0.0876

0.0843

0.0352

0.0040

0.0058

0.1694

0.0408

0.0542

0.0418

0.0743

0.0280

0.0189

0.0755 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

806 13

Naugawa Conte ...

570

505

504

508

517

518/1

518/2

519

240

520

239

230/2

230/1

229

228

227/2

222

221

216.

196

198

197

201

200

203

202

204

378

205

2 14

Guda Choota

16/2

16/3

18/3

174

Mahuda

172

169

170

171

168

165

176

615 4

0.0190

0.0460

0.0756

0.0749

0.0313

0.0981

0.0699

0.1016

0.0015

0.0754

0.0588

0.1066

0.1224

0.3038

0.0190

0.0159

0.1067

0.0193

0.2480

0.0274

0.1684

0.0558

0.0469

0.0735

0.1496

0.0053

0.1009

0.0199

0.1185

0.0334

0.1153

0.0110

0.0150

0.0953

0.1457

0.1593

0.4192

0.0156

0.1272

0.0248

0.0517

0.0235

0.0688

0.2052

0.0078

0.2112

0.0035

0.0135

0.1174

0.1102 616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

3 15

Mahuda Cont...

178

182

181/2

181/1

180/2

180/1

189

191

192

194

195

198

199

200

201

163

84/1

84/2

76/1

76/2

206

210

211

213

214

215

216

217/1

205

219

218/2

220

221/1

467/2

468

469

478

479

480

488

489

92 16

Shivgarh

130

131

156 PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

0.0130

0.0246

0.0504

0.0012

0.1274

0.0091

0.2163

0.1475

0.0159

0.0232

0.0110

0.0695

0.0955

0.0737

0.0261

0.0449

0.1408

0.0854

0.1373

0.0432

0.0360

0.0333

0.1058

0.0601

0.0672

0.0113

0.1177

0.0030

0.0463

0.0152

0.1075

0.0174

0.2316

0.2499

0.0317

0.0092

0.1310

0.1523

0.2239

0.0741

0.1821

0.0456

0.0098

0.0817

0.2603

0.0835

0.2232

0.0252

0.1296

0.0648 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

157

Shivganh cont ...

16.

162

163

164

165

166

18 17

Ganeshpura

24/1

24/2

24/3

24/4

24/5

Kundla

1 19

9/1

R.F. 20

417

Panchpipaliya

416

327

415

414

328/2

331/3

333/2

331/1

411

410

617 0.1080

0.0432

0.0828

0.0072

0.0080

0.0260

0.0846

0.1679

0.0042

0.0247

0.0570

0.0789

0.0507

0.0641

0.0668

0.0137

0.1704

0.0366

0.0318

0.2054

0.1233

0.0921

0.0147

0.1068

0.0303

0.0648

0.0019

0.1854

0.0342

0.0055

0.0025

0.0360

0.1532

0.0201

0.0036

0.1109

0.0040

0.0257

0.0617

5.0688

0.0098

0.1178

0.1041

0.0031

0.0072

0.0973

0.0888

0.0720

0.0611

0.0128

0.0014 618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1. 1927

3 1

334/2 20

Panchpipaliya Contd...

335/3

335/4

336/4

336/5

338/1

408

396

395

394

393

392

391

361

390

362

363/2

363/1

363/3

367

368

369

370

R.F.

347 21

Jamda

353

352

359

360

364

343

365

366

370

371

368

336

310

309

299

300

R.F.

[ PART 11 - SC , 3 (ii) [

0.1160

0.0433

0.1040

0.1204

0.0041

0.2533

0.0912

0.0269

0.0268

0.0996

0.0472

0.0449

0.0984

0.0559

0.0647

0.0516

0.2341

0.0055

0.1539

0.1441

0.0188

0.1482

0.0181

1.3752

0.0607

0.0184

0.2084

0.0279

0.0949

0.0011

0.0017

0.0925

0.1674

0.0320

0.0397

0.1607

0.0669

0.3247

0.2329

0.0252

2.5344

[F. No. R- 25011 /1/2006 - O.R. -IJ S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

619

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 16 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 255.- केन्दीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता हे कि मध्य प्रदेश में मांगल्या (इन्दौर) संस्थापन से हरयाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र मे विजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चा;ि

और केन्दीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है. उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए :

जाए अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50), की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए. उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

प्रति जो अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिये उसमे उपयोग भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, बी 105. इन्द्र विहार, तलवंडी, कोटा जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री दीपक नन्दी, राक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई-मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना 324005 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

तहसील: पिडावा

जिला: झालावाड क्र०

ग्राम का नाम

रामपुरिया

कोटडीखुर्द

शेरपुर

दीवलखेडा

कल्याणपुरा सालरी

अनुसूची

राज्य: राजस्थान सर्वे नम्बर

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

178

0.0288

799

0.0648

0.0216

330

0.0216

612

0.0432

356

0.0550

391

0.0334

593

0.0216

0.0630

1006

0.0360

879

0.0144

952

0.0288

962

0.0072

फा०सं०आर०-31015/ 84 / 2004-ओ आर- || हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th January , 2006

S. 0. 255- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mangiya ( Indore ) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, an extension pipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi shouldbe laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Miocrals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50) of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copics of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Deepak Nandi , Competent Authority, Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, B - 105 , Indravihar, Talwandi , Kota - 324005 ( Rajasthan) .

TEHSIL: PIDAWA

DISTRICT : JHALAWAR

S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE

RAMPURIYA

KOTRI KHURD

SHERPUR

DIWAL KHEDA

KALYANPURA

SALRI

SCHEDULE

STATE : RAJASTHAN

SURVEY NO .

AREA IN HECTARE 3

178

0.0288

799

0.0648

0.0216

330

0.0216

612

0.0432

356

0.0550

391

0.0334

593

0.0216

0.0630

1006

0.0360

879

0.0144

952

0.0288

962

0.0072

[ F.N. R- 31015/ 84 2004 -OR - II ]

HARISII KUMAR , Under Secretary 620

[ PART 11 -SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA I , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 256- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2670 तारीख 28 जुलाई, 2005 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 30 जुलाई, 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इंदौर) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र मेंमें बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई - मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 22 सितम्बर , 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने. उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से सलग्नं अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता हैं ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

तहसील: इन्द्रगढ

जिला: बून्दी

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य: राजस्थान क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

क्र० ग्राम का नाम

0.0360

1. कोटा खुर्द

0.1296

0.0288

0.1584

0.0144

0.1728

0.0090

0.0216

2. लबान

294

0.0072

293

0.3456

297

0.0216

298

0.1800

299

0.0020

300

0.0936

301

0.1296

306

0.1296

0.0020

307

305

0.1440

331

0.0504

0.1224

332

333

0.1008

0.3312

304

225

0.0144

338

0.0144

224

0.0020

211

0.1440

210

0.1296

209

0.0576

208

0.2304

205

0.2304

203

0.0020

204

0.1440 621 राग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

200

0.0020

2. लबान (जारी...)

0.2088

198

0.1224

161

197

0.0288

166/1406

0.2016

162

0.0144

0.0360

166

178

0.0360

0.0504

45/229

3. सुनारी

0.0270

48/257

299

0.1282

4. जाड़ला

0.0506

290

5. बडाखेडा

1341

0.1212

1344

0.0700

1342

0.0778

फा०सं०आर०-31015/85/ 2004--ओ आर- ॥

हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th January, 2006

S. O. 256. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.2670 , dated the 28th July, 2005 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) published in the Gazette of India dated the 30 July,2005 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying on extension pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai -Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Manglya ( Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 22 September, 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in said land, specified in the Schedule ; appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration, in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

TEHSIL : INDARGARH

DISTRICT : BUNDI

STATE : RAJASTHAN S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE

SURVEY NO .

AREA IN HECTARE 1 2

1. KOTA KHURD

0.0360

0.1296

55G1 /2006-18 [ PART 11 -- SEC. 3 ( ii ) | 622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1. 1927

0.0288

1. KOTA KHURD ( Contd ... )

0.1584

0.0144

0.1728

0.0090

0.0216

0.0072

294

2. LABAN

0.3456

293

0.0216

297

0.1800

298

0.0020

299

300

0.0936

0.1296

301

0.1296

306

307

0.0020

305

0.1440

0.0504

331

332

0.1224

333

0.1008

0.3312

304

225

0.0144

338

0.0144

224

0.0020

211

0.1440

210

0.1296

209

0.0576

208

0.2304

205

0.2304

0.0020

203

204

0.1440

0.0020

200

0.2088

198

161

0.1224

197

0.0288

166/1406

0.2016

162

0.0144

166

0.0360

178

0.0360

0.0504

45/229

3. SUNARI

0.0270

48/257

0.1282

299

4. JADLA

290

0.0506

1341

0.1212

5. BADAKHEDA

1344

0.0700

0.0778

1342

[F.N. R - 31015/ 85/ 2004 - OR - I1 ]

HARISH KUMAR , Under Secretary [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

623

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 257.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है. ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.. 2669 तारीख 28 जुलाई, 2005, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 30 जुलाई, 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 22 सितम्बर, 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की गरा की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से सलग्नं अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता हैं ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: राजस्थान तहसील: इन्द्रगढ़

जिला: बून्दी

सर्वे नंबर ग्राम का नाम

3 2

94 1. बलदेवपुरा

25 2. कोटडी

20/1104

702 3. घाट का बराना

701

704

705

703

706

706/1337

707

710

708

709

720

721

694

693

691

568

571

570

574/3

573

577

578

557 क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

0.0124

0.0504

0.1800

0.2856

0.2346

0.3223

0.0772

0.0231

0.0305

0.1500

0.0094

0.1668

0.0020

0.6726

0.0276

0.0166

0.0830

0.1629

0.1244

0.0020

0.0144

0.1296

01674

0.0902

0.0104

0.1540

0.0045

0.0977

0.0120

0.3101

0.0900

0.0134

0.0087

0.0642

0.0098

0.0916

0.0929

0.2310

0.0020 624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

581 3. घाट का बराना (जारी...)

556

553

552

554

594

596

597

598

601

602

603

543

494

493

495

504

496

503

502

501

508

509

511

512 4. झपायता

202

201

205

206

215

267

266/851

266

269

277

278

276

303

302

301

300

299

304

358

359

366

365

369

376

378

377 5. वेहीखेड़ा

1091

1092

1093

1094

1103

1104

1102

1106

1107

1108

1134

1133

1126

1127

1149

1188

1187

1186 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

0.0020

0.1196

0.0906

0.0020

0.0652

0.0612

0.1059

0.2160

0.0108

0.2672

0.1829

0.0223

0.0368

0.0974

0.0414

0.2152

0.0195

0.1269

0.0172

0.1218

0.1439

0.0144

0.1766

0.2108

0.0200

0.0218

0.2448

0.2722

0.0123

0.0210

0.0168

0.1255

0.2569

0.0351

0.1921

0.0597

0.1925

0.0792

0.2363

0.0115

0.0224

0.0110

0.0520

0.0634

0.2949

0.1274

0.2114

0.0330

0.0285

0.1658

0.0176

0.0576

0.0792

0.0072

0.0504

0.0110

0.0045

0.0118

0.2160

0.0072

0.1872

0.0288

0.2191

0.0288

0.0251

0.0145

0.0291

0,2230

0.0072 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

3 2

1190 5. देहीखेड़ा (जारी...)

1191

1244

1243

1223

1225

1224

1218

1215

1216

1210

1076

779

778

780

781

782

775

774

772

773

767

766

769

770

738

739

740

737

736

735

1266

1357

1358

1332

1333

1329

1319

1320

1318

1321

1323

1292

1293

1294

1295

1296

1301

1297

1285

1284

1282

1283

1278

1273

625

0.2448

0.0648

0.0720

0.1224

0.0720

0.1944

0.1080

0.2616

0.0200

0.0100

0.0288

0.0357

0.0100

0.2232

0.0288

0.0020

0.0302

0.1063

0.0498

0.1944

0.0360

0.1813

0.0097

0.0936

0.0504

0.0020

0.1017

0.0360

0.1296

0.1080

0.0030

0.0702

0.3573

0.0040

0.0404

0.3084

0.2372

0.1603

0.0500

0.1091

0.1371

0.1621

0.0439

0.2902

0.0560

0.0468

0.0216

0.1296

0.1700

0.1201

0.0173

0.1440

0.0419

0.1872

0.0144

फा०सं ०आर०-31015/ 85 / 2004-ओ आर- ॥ हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव,

New Delhi , the 17th January , 2006

S. O. 257.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number $ .0.2669 , dated the 28th July, 2005 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 30 July, 2005 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying on extension 626

[ PART 11 - SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Manglya (Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 22 September , 2005 ;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in said land , specified in the Schedule ; appended to this notification. is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

STATE : RAJASTHAN

DISTRICT : BUNDI

TEHSIL : INDARGARH

NAME OF VILLAGE

S.No.

SURVEY NO .

AREA IN HECTARE

BALDEVPURA

0.0124

0.0504

0.1800

0.2856

0.2346

0.3223

0.0772

0.0231

2. KOTDI

0.0305

0.1500

0.0094

0.1668

0.0020

0.6726

20/1104

0.0276

702

3. GHAT KA BARANA

0.0166

701

0.0830

704

0.1629

705

0.1244

703

0.0020

706

0.0144

706/1337

0.1296

707

0.1674

710

0.0902

708

0.0104

709

0.1540

0.0045

720

721

0.0977

694

0.0120

693

0.3101

691

0.0900

568

0.0134

571

0.0087

570

0.0642

574/3

0.0098

573

0.0916

577

0.0929

578

0.2310

0.0020

557

0.1817

580 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/ माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 2

581 3. GHAT KA BARANA ( CONTD ... )

556

553

552

554

594

596

597

598

601

602

603

543

494

493

495

504

496

503

502

501

508

509

511

512

202 4. JHAPAYATA

201

205

206

215

267

266/851

266

269

277

278

276

303

302

301

300

299

304

358

359

366

365

369

376

378

377 5. DEHI KHEDA

1091

1092

1093

1094

1103

1104

1102

1106

1107

1108

1134

1133

1126

1127

1149

1188

1187

627 4

0.0020

0.1196

0.0906

0.0020

0.0652

0.0612

0.1059

0.2160

0.0108

0.2672

0.1829

0.0223

0.0368

0.0974

0.0414

0.2152

0.0195

0.1269

0.0172

0.1218

0.1439

0.0144

0.1.766

0.2108

0.0200

0.0218

0.2448

0.2722

0.0123

0.0210

0.0168

0.1255

0.2569

0.0351

0.1921

0.0597

0.1925

0.0792

0.2363

0.0115

0.0224

0.0110

0.0520

0.0634

0.2949

0.1274

0.2114

0.0330

0.0285

0.1658

0.0176

0.0576

0.0792

0.0072

0.0504

0.0110

0.0045

0.0118

0.2160

0.0072

0.1872

0.0288

0.2191

0.0288

0.0251

0.0145

0.0291

0.2230 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

628

3 2

1186 5. DEHI KHEDA ( CONTD ... )

1190

1191

1244

1243

1223

1225

1224

1218

1215

1216

1210

1076

779

778

780

781

782

775

774

772

773

767

766

769

770

738

739

740

737

736

735

1266

1357

1358

1332

1333

1329

1319

1320

1318

1321

1323

1292

1293

1294

1295

1296

1301

1297

1285

1284

1282

1283

1278

1273

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

0.0072

0.2448

0.0648

0.0720

0.1224

0.0720

0.1944

0.1080

0.2616

0.0200

0.0100

0.0288

0.0357

0.0100

0.2232

0.0288

0.0020

0.0302

0.1063

0.0498

0.1944

0.0360

0.1813

0.0097

0.0936

0.0504

0.0020

0.1017

0.0360

0.1296

0.1080

0.0030

0.0702

0.3573

0.0040

0.0404

0.3084

0.2372

0.1603

0.0500

0.1091

0.1371

0.1621

0.0439

0.2902

0.0560

0.0468

0.0216

0.1296

0.1700

0.1201

0.0173

0.1440

0.0419

0.1872

0.0144

[F.N. R- 31015 / 85 / 2004 - OR- II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secretary 629

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21. 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 258.- केन्दीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता हे कि मध्य प्रदेश में मांगल्या (इन्दौर) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्दीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिये उसमे उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री दीपक नन्दी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना, भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, बी-105 , इन्द्र विहार, तलवंडी, कोटा 324005 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला: बून्दी

तहसील: इन्द्रगढ,

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

सर्वे नम्बर

ग्राम का नाम

क्र०

0.0400

704

घाट का बराना

0.0300

495

फा०सं०आर०-31015/85/ 2004-ओ आर- ॥ हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th January , 2006

S. O. 258. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Manglya (Indore ) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, an extension pipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi should be laid by BharatPetroleum Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Deepak Nandi , Competent Authority , Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, B - 105 , Indravihar , Talwandi , Kota - 324005 (Rajasthan) .

55 GI / 2006-19 630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) |

SCHEDULE

DISTRICT : BUNDI

TEHSIL : INDARGARH

STATE : RAJASTHAN AREA IN HECTARE

SURVEY NO .

S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE

0.0400

704

GHAT KA BARANA

0.0300

495

[F.N. R - 31015 / 85/ 2004 - OR - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secretary

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 259.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए जामनगर भोपाल और काकिनाडा- हैदराबाद गोवा पाइपलाइन को आपस में जोडने के लिए गैस द्रान्सपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमीटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपावद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अव, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेद्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलवद्धव्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के सम्वन्ध में श्री . ए . के . संघवी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गैस द्रान्सपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमीटेड पाइपलाइन परियोजना, आनंद महल अपार्टमेंट, भुल्का भवन शाला के सामने, आनंद महल रोड , सूरत 395009 , गुजरात राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 631

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

तहसील: वागरा

राज्य: गुजरात

जिल्ला: भरुच

आर ओ यु अर्जित करने के लिये क्षेत्रफल गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर / ब्लाक नं

आरे

हेकटर

5 1

112

1. आंकोट

113

116

117

रास्ता

120/अ

120/ब

120/क

118/ब

119

136

137

143

144

146

147/1

147/2

148

डामर रास्ता

158

159

155

नहर

156

215

47 2. सलादरा

डामर रास्ता

217

218

224

225

229

228

गटर

6-अ

6-व

12 632

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

5 1

निरंतर ... सलादरा

19-अ

19-व

25-अ

25-व

नहर

26-अ

26-ब

27-अ

27-व

कच्चा रास्ता

भुखी नदी

134

58 3. अरगामा

131

तहसील : भरुच

जिल्ला: भरुच

राज्य: गुजरात

830

1. दयादरा

840

839

838

836

833

834

835

फील्ड चेनल

826

811

810

नहर

730

731

732

733

734

735

99 633

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

14 निरंतर ... दयादरा

फील्ड चेनल

709

राज्यधोरीमार्ग

707

रेल्वे

705

670

704

673

675

672

676

नहर

456

2. त्रालसा

455

458

463

नहर

465

466

467

482-अ-पै

481

471

472

473

475

476

कच्चा रास्ता

656/4/1

656/4/2

658-क

663-अ

663-ब

673

674

कच्चा रास्ता

675

1055

687/4/1

680

683

कच्चा रास्ता

740

743 634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

2 1

744 निरंतर ...त्रालसा

748

749

734/4/2

752

758

757

792

793

794

रास्ता

795

796

797

798

799

801

610-अ 3. परीओज

610-व

611

620

621

623

624

674

675

676

677

678/4/1

679

372 4. हींगल्ला

370-अ

370-ब

नहर

365-अ

365-व

362-अ

362-व

कच्चा रास्ता

385

383

384

386

कच्चा रास्ता

350/4/1

319

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

5 3

08 00

02 00

64 00

05 00

71 00

47 00

30 00

88 00

60 00

66 00

74 00

65 00

59 00

39 00

04 00

29 00

66 00

43 00

36 00

15 00

09 00

95 00

09 00

43 00

00 00

84 00

78 00

65 00

36 00

05 635

भारत का राजपत्र जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

3 1

320

00 निरंतर ... हींगल्ला

321

322

325

326

327

328

329

कच्चा रास्ता

240

262

रास्ता

261

260

259

258

265

257

256

255

252

251

253

कच्चा रास्ता

115

116

118

117

119

121

123

122

124

रास्ता

125

126

5. वोरी

71/4/1

71/4/2

67/4/1

63-अ-पै

नाला

कच्चा रास्ता

24 05 636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

15-ब निरंतर ...बोरी

28/4/1

28/4/2

31/अ

31/व

41/अ

41/ब

कच्चा रास्ता

169 6. करगट

171

172

197

201

203/क

नहर

धोरीमार्ग - 8

203/4/1

702 7. नबीपुर

700

699

696

695

694

693

692

690

691

नाला

रेल्वे

636

132 8. बंबुसर

131

130

368 9. जंधार

367

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

51 00

22 00

99 00

64 00

32 00

13 00

65 00

55 00

29 00

71 00

40 00

71 00

11 00

23 00

89 00

98 00

96 00

36 00

56 00

60 00

35 00

90 00

82 00

78 00

00 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

366

निरंतर...जंधार

364

363

355

354

353

350

351

348

347

346

कच्चा रास्ता

238

234

233

232

231

230

229

228

227

266

224

267

268

269

208

210

211

193

194

192

178

179

कच्चा रास्ता

102

103

108

109

113

114

329

10. सामलोद

323

320-व

310

322

55GI/ 2006-20

637

09 09

90 07

04 02

37 14

78 08

54 10

03 29

47 10

54 17

06 06

47 00

04 14

81 09

22 16

14 02

61 24

44 23

95 06

59 16

28 71

01 19

41 39

03 41

92 36

58 32

94 31 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

638

नहर निरंतर ... सायलो

309

308

307

306

कच्चा रास्ता

356/4/3

357

358

गटर

368

369

370

367

371

372

373

374/ब

375

रास्ता

396

397

398

399

400

रास्ता

421/4/1

421/4/2

417/अ

417/ब

417/क

नहर

400 11. झनोर

394

393/4/1

393/4/2

395

392

391

रास्ता

कच्चा रास्ता

462

464

463

459

458

[ PART IIS , 3 ( ii ) |

03 00

32 00

64 00

36 00

44 00

53 00

85 00

27 00

87 00

70 00

92 00

40 00

59 00

31 00

39 00

93 00

18 00

64 00

03 00

92 00

78 00

69 00

70 00

26 00

49 00

99 00

38 00

09 00

48 00

39 639

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

457

92 निरंतर...झनोर

454

442

[ फा. सं. एल -14014 / 40/ 2005 जी.पी. ] एस. बी. मंडल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th January , 2005

S. O. 259. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest 'that for the transportation of natural gas through an interconnection between Jamnagar - Bhopal and Kakinada - Hydrabad - Goa pipeline , a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of usertherein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty -one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri.A.K.Sanghavi , Competent Authority , Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project , Anand Mahal Apartment , Opposite to Bhulka Bhavan School , Anand Mahal Road , Surat - 395009 , Gujarat .

SCHEDULE

State: Gujarat

District: Bharuch

Tehsil : Vagra

Area to be Acquired for ROU Survey No./Block No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.m

112

1.Ankot

113

116

117

Road

120/A

12.0/B

120/C

118/B

119 640

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

136

00 1. Ankot Contelo ..

137

143

144

146

147/1

147/2

148

Asphalted Road

158

159

155

Canal

156

215

2. Saladara

Asphalted Road

217

218

224

225

229

228

Drain

6-A

6-B

19-A

19-B

25-A

25-B

Canal

26-A

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

08 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

26-B

00 Contd... Saladara

27-A

27-B

CartTrack

Bhukhi Kadi

134

00 3.Argama

131

District: Bharuch Taluka : Bharuch

830

00 1. Dayadara

840

839

838

836

833

834

835

Filed Channal

826

811

810

Canal

730

731

732

733

734

735

Filed Channal

709

Road(SH)

707

Railway(NG)

705

670

704

673

641 4

State: Gujrat

50 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1. 1927

642

675

00 Contd ... Dayadara

672

676

Canai

456

2. Tralsa

455

458

463

Canal

465

466

467

482-A-P

481

471

472

473

475

476

CartTrack

656/P/1

656/P/2

658-C

663-A

663-B

673

674

CartTrack

675

1055

687/P/1

680

683

CartTrack

740

743

744

748

749

734/P/2

752

758

[ PART 11- Sec. 3 ( ii ) |

13 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

3 1

757

Contd... Tralsa

792

793

794

Road

795

796

797

798

799

801

610-A

3. Pariej

610-B

611

620

621

623

624

674

675

676

677

678/P/1

679

372

00 4.Hingarla

370-A

370-B

Canal

365-A

365-B

362-A

362-B

CartTrack

385

383

384

386

CartTrack

350/P/1

319

320

321

322

643 4

04.

07 644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

00 Contd...Hingarla

325

326

327

328

329

CartTrack

240

262

Road

261

260

259

258

265

257

256

255

252

251

253

CartTrack

115

116

118

117

119

121

123

122

124

Road

125

126

5. Bori

71/P/1

71/P/2

67/P/1

63-A-P

Nala

CartTrack

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 4

03 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927 1

3 Contd... Bori

15-B

28/P/1

00 .

28/P/2.

31/A

31/B

00 .

41/A

41/B

CartTrack

169

6.Kargat

171

172

197

201

203 /C

Canal

Road(NH)

203/P/1

702

7.Nabipur

700

699

696

695

694

693

692

690

691

Nala

Railway(BG)

636

00 55G1/2006-21

645 4

35 646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

3 1

132

8. Bambusar

131

130

368

9. Jhangar

367

366

364

363

355

354

353

350

351

348

347

346

CartTrack

238

234

233

232

231

230

229

228

227

266

224

267

268

269

208

210

211

193

194

192

178

PART 11 - SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4

81 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006 /माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

179

Contd... Jhangar

CartTrack

102

103

108

109

113

114

329

10. Samlod

323

320-B

310

322

Canal

309

308

307

306

CartTrack

356/P/3

357

358

Drain

368

369

370

367

371

372

373

374/B

375

Road

396

397

398

399

400

647 4

31 648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

Road

00 Contd ... Samlod

421/P/1

421/P/2

417/A

417/B

417/C

Canal

400

00 11. Jhanor

394

393/P/1

393/P/2

395

392

391

Road

CartTrack

462

464

463.

459

458

457

454

442

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

29.

[F. No. L-14014/40/2005-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 260.-- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए जामनगर भोपाल और काकिनाडा हैदराबाद गोवा पाइपलाइन को आपस में जोडने के लिए गैस द्रान्सपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमीटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेद्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

649 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006 /माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलबद्धब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री . ए . के . संघवी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गैस द्रान्सपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमीटेड पाइपलाइन परियोजना, आनंद महल अपार्टमेंट , भुल्का भवन शाला के सामने, आनंद महल रोड, सूरत 395009 , गुजरात राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तहसील: उमरगाम

जिल्ला: वलसाड

राज्य: गुजरात

आर ओ यु अर्जित करने के लिये क्षेत्रफल गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर / ब्लोक नं

हेकटर आरे

1. नगवास

[फा. सं. एल-14014/41 /2005- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मंडल , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 17th January, 2005

S. O. 260. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through an interconnection between Jamnagar - Bhopal and Kakinada - Hydrabad - Goa pipeline , a pipeline should be laid by GasTransportation and Infrastructure Company Limited ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of usertherein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty -one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri.A.K.Sanghavi , Competent Authority , Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project, Anand Mahal Apartment , Opposite to Bhulka Bhavan School , Anand Mahal Road , Surat - 395009, Gujarat .

650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) |

SCHEDULE

District : Valsad

State : Gujar

Tehsil : Umargam

Area to be acquired for ROU .

Survey No./Block No.

Name of the Village

Are

Sq.m

Hectare

1.Nagawas

[F. No. L - 14014/41/2005-G.P . ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी, 2006

का. आ. 261.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1708 तारीख 4 मई, 2005 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 7 मई, 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोणी ( पुणे) से पकनी (सोलापुर) तक हजारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 4 जुलाई, 2005 , को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात , और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

अनुसूची तालुका: हवेली

651 राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 1

803 1 कदमवाकवस्ती

767

849

763

615

605

599

1747 2 लोनी कालभोर

1791

1699

1696

1694

1527

1526

1518

1517

1512

1503

1467

1465

1459

1419

1170

1120 3 आलंदी

म्हातोबाची

1094

1090

क्षेत्रफल

उप -खण्ड संख्यां हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

6 7

00 00 59

00 01

00 02

00 05

0001

00 11

57 कुल

00 26

00 01

00 02

00 05 44

00 03 47

00 07 54

00 02 55

00 02

00 01 38

00 02 04

00 02

00 03

00 65

25 कुल

00 04 23

00 15

00 02

62 652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )]

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कम सं.

उप-खण्ड संख्या हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 7

1065

3 आलंदी

1055

80 म्हातोबाची (निरंतर)

00 25 61

कुल

[फा. सं. आर-31015/24/2004- ओ. आर ।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th January , 2006

S. O. 261.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1708 , dated the 4th May , 2005 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 7th May, 2005 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai- Pune Pipeline Extension Project from Loni ( Pune ) to Pakni ( Solapur) via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 4th July, 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Govemment , vest on the date of publication of this declaration , in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances .

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

653

SCHEDULE

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : HAVELI

GatNo.

Name of the Village Survey No.

Sr. No.

803 1 KADAM WAKWASTI

767

849

763

615

605

599

1747 2 LONI KALBHOR

1791

1699

1696

1694

1527

1526

1518

1517

1512

1503

1467

1465

1459

1419

1170

1120 3

ALANDI

1094 ( MHATOBACHI )

1090 55 G1 / 2006-22

Area

Sub- Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

00 59

00 20

00 01 93

00 00 20

00 02 21

00 05 23

00 01 21

11 57

Total

26 10

01 80

00 80

00 02

00 02 54

01 38

02 04

02 24

03 88

65 25 Total

62 654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART I-- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : PUNE

Taluka : HAVELI

Area

GatNo.

Name of the Village Survey No.

Sub- Division No.

Sr. No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

01 60

1065

ALANDI

01 80

1055

(MHATOBACHI ) ( Contd.)

00 25 61

Total

[No. R- 31015/24/2004- O.R. - 1 HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 262 .-- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, डी-7 लालबहादुर नगर ( पूर्व ) क्लार्क्स आमेर होटल के सामने , जवाहरलाल नेहरु मार्ग, मालवीय नगर, जयपुर-302017 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा। भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii)]

655

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

अनुसूची

तहसील : बाली

जिला : पाली

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6 1. नाना

2420/1मिन

720/2923

0 0

16 04

2. बीजापुर

[फा. सं. आर-31015/45/2004-ओ.आर ।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 17th January, 2006

S. O. 262. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra to Delhi , a pipeline shouldbe laidby Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority , Mundra- Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline Project, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , D- 7 , Lal Bahadur Nagar ( East) , Opp . Clarks Amer Hotel , Jawaharlal Nehru Marg , Malviya Nagar, Jaipur - 302017 ( Rajasthan)

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : BALI

State : RAJASTHAN

District : PALI

Area

Khasara No.

Are

Sr. No

Hectare

Sq.mtr. Name of the Village

6 2

1. ΝΑΝΑ

2420/1Min

720/2923

2. BEEJAPUR

[No. R- 31015/45/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy .

656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 263. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 19.62 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा- दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , डी -7 लालबहादुर नगर ( पूर्व ) , क्लार्क्स आमेर होटल के सामने , जवाहरलाल नेहरु मार्ग , मालवीय नगर , जयपुर-302017 (राजस्थान ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : सिरोही

तहसील : आबू रोड

राज्य : राजस्थान क्रम

क्षेत्रफल सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

1. आमयला

142/1166

[फा. सं. आर-31015/44/2004- ओ.आर || ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 657

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 17th January , 2006

S. O. 263. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of usertherein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur, Competent Authority , Mundra- Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, D- 7 , Lal Bahadur Nagar ( East ) , Opp. Clarks Amer Hotel , Jawaharlal Nehru Marg , Malviya Nagar, Jaipur 302017 ( Rajasthan)

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : ABU ROAD

District : SIROHI

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare

Khasara No.

Are Sr. No

Name of the Village

Sq.mtr.

5 1

142/1166

1. AMTHALA

19 08

[No. R- 31015/44/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

6.58

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[ PART 11 - SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 264. - केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2409 तारीख 01 जुलाई, 2005 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 09 जुलाई , 2005 , में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मुन्द्रा- दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 25 अगस्त, 2005 , को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है :

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात , और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पत्र सं . आर 31015/7/03 ओ.आर -11 दिनांक 25/11/2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शर्तों के अध्यधीन सभी विल्लंगों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । | भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006 /माघ 1 , 1927

अनुसूची

659 राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

तहसील : कोटपूतली

खसरा सं .

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

3 1

1. ठीकरिया

617

580 2. तुलसीपुरा

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

69 0

71 0

3676/3709 (स.भूमि)

3676

49 3. टोरडाब्राह्मणान्

50 0

64 0

20 0

41(स.नाला)

17 4. बडनगर

3504

3503

3484

3465

3457

3456

3377

3376 5. भांकरी

1499

1505

2150

2140 0

74 0

48 0

19 0 .

68 0

27 0

10 0

48 0

77 0

1933(स.नाली)

1806

1797 0

29 0

1796/2274

1784 6. मंडा

810

809

795

792

789

12 0

19 0

71 0

774(स .रास्ता)

709

692 0

32 0

10 0

619(स.नाला)

616

612

604 0

21 0

74 660

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

तहसील : कोटपूतली

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सं .

हेक्टेयर

गाँव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर क्रम सं.

6 2

1396

6. मंडा (जारी...)

1467

1461

1462

1493

7. राजनोता

248

2.52

261

259

271

332

330

323

536

583

597

598(स. चरागाह)

600

836(स. चरागाह)

8. दादुका

322(एस.आर.पी. )

474

475/1334 (एस.आर.पी.)

482

502

508/1324

507

505

506

590

662

704

703

709

732

731

728

723

724

1237

9. बसई

1238

1301 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

तहसील : कोटपूतली

661

जिला : जयपुर

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

3 9. बसई (जारी...)

1300

1299

1291

1267

1033

1032

1031

1020

990

979

919

916

864

865

883

889

97 10. नांगल पण्डितपुरा

101

118

140

149

191

196

2135 11. बुचाहेडा

2146

2149

1964

1971 12. बालावास

160

158

161

162 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

एयर

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर 4

148 (स. रास्ता)

13. बडावास

1359

1361 0

1160/1484

1160

1167

711

716

746 55 G1 /2006-23

..5 662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1. 1927

तहसील : कोटपूतली

PART 11-- SLC. 3 (ii ) ] राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

खसरा सं.

744 13. बडावास (जारी ...)

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

737 (स. रास्ता)

113

145

190

191

199

198 14. बासड़ी

1721

1725

1640 15. मोलाहेडा

830

831

832

820 0

860(स . भूमि)

819

671

672

673

762

767/1026

466 16. शेखुपुर

467

482

766

765

614

633

631

646

661

662

663 0

664(स.नदी)

669 17. बीजाहेडा

696

692

685

680

675

20 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/मात्र 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

663 राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

तहसील : कोटपूतली

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

672 17. बीजाहेडा (जारी ...)

656

650

638

621

606

603

585

567

197

193

156

155

141

126

1329 18. पनियाला

1339

1334

1501

1500

1491

1492

1643

1659

1656

1664

1673

2157

2156

1674

2155

2128

2130

2081

2024

1044 19. मोरदा

1045

1074

1109

1112

1125 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

80 0

84 0

11 0

52 0

0.0

25 0

32 0

59 0

24 0

37 0

66 0

28 0

43 0

80 0

09 664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1, 1927

[ PART 11- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

राज्य : राजस्थान तहसील : कोटपूतली

जिला : जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

1124

19. मोरदा (जारी...)

1164

1159

1158

883

881

872

871

873

856

860

853

[फा. सं. आर-31015/64/2004- ओ.आर ॥ ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचित्र New Delhi , the 17th January, 2006

S. O. 264.- Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2409 dated the 01st July , 2005 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 09th July , 2005 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the State of Gujarat to Delhi through Mundra -Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 25th August , 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of publication of declaration , in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances , subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter no. R- 31015/7/03 OR- II dated 25-11-2004.

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/ माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

665

SCHEDULE

District: JAIPUR

Tehsil : KOTPUTLI

Sr. No.

Khasara No. Name of the Village

617 1. THIKRIYA

580 2. TULSIPURA

3676/3709(G/ L )

3676

49 3. TORDABRAHMNAN

41(G/ L Nala)

17 4. BADNAGAR

3504

3503

3484

3465

3457

3456

3377

3376

1499 5. BHANKRI

1505

2150

2140

1933( G / L Nali )

1806

1797

1796/2274

1784

810 6. MANDA

809

795

792

789

774 ( G / L Cart Track)

709

692

619(G/L Nala)

616

612

604 State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

69 0

00.

96 0

64 0

40 0

12 0

48 0

19 0

68 0

10 0

48 0

17 0

89 0

27 0

40 0

19 0

32 0

01 600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

Tehsil : KOTPUTLI

[ PART II - SEC . 3 (ii) ]

District: JAIPUR

Sr. No.

Khasara No. Name of the Village

1396 6. MANDA ( Contd ... )

1467

1461

1462

1493

248 7. RAJNOTA

252

261

259

271

332

330

323

536

583

597 State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

598 ( G / L Pasture)

600

836 ( G / L Pasture)

8. DADUKA

322( SRP)

474 0

475/1334( SRP)

482

502

508/1324

507

505

506

590

662

704

703

709

732

731

728

723

724

1237 9. BASAI

1238

1301 0

50 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

667 State : RAJASTHAN

District: JAIPUR

Tehsil : KOTPUTLI

Sr. No

Khasara No. Name of the Village

1300 9. BASAI ( Contd ... )

1299

1291

1267

1033

1032

1031

1020

990

979

919

916

864

865

883

889

97 10. NAGAL PANDITPURA

101

118

140

149

191

196

2135 11. BUCHAHEDA

2146

2149

1964

1971

160 12. BALAWAS

158

161

162

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

60 0

56 0

18 0

58 0

31 0

29 0

76 0

49 0

44 0

95 0

74 0

57 0

48 0

10 0

17 0

13 0

148(G /L Cart Track)

1359 13. BADAWAS

1361

57 0

1160/1484

1160

1167

711

716

746

31 0

95 0 668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : KOTPUTLI

District : JAIPUR

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr. No.

Are

Khasara No.

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

Name of the Village

744

64 13. BADAWAS ( Contd ... )

737 ( G / L Cart Track)

113

145

190

191

199

198

1721

14. BASADI

1725

1640

830

81 15. MOLAHEDA

831

832

820

860(G/L)

819

671

672

673

762

767/1026

466

16. SHEKHUPUR

467

482

766

765

614

633

631

646

661

662

663

664(G/L River)

669

696

17. BINJAHEDA

692

685

680

675 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Tehsil : KOTPUTLI

669 State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Sr. No.

Khasara No. Name of the Village

672 17. BINJAHEDA ( Contd ... )

656

650

638

621

606

603

585

567

197

193

156

155

141

126

1329 18. PANIYALA

1339

1334

1501

1500

1491

1492

1643

1659

1656

1664

1673

2157

2156

1674

2155

2128

2130

2081

2024

1044 19. MORDA

1045

1074

1109

1112

1125 55 GI /2006-24

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

03 18

26 0

20 0

28 0

23 0

53 0

57 0

80 0 670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1. 1927

PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : KOTPUTLI

District : JAIPUR

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr No

Khasara No.

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

Narne of the Village

1124

97 19 MORDA ( Contd ... )

1164

1159

1158

883

881

872

871

873

856

860

853

00 08

[No. R-31015/64/2004-0.R. - IIj

HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 19 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 265.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2411 तारीख 01 जुलाई, 2005 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 09 जुलाई , 2005 , में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने ॥शय की घोषणा की थी;

ओर उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 26 अगस्त , 2005 , को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

असक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपो दी है :

प्यार केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात , और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्वय 'केया है ,

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रीय करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन जियने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माध 1 , 1927

671 और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पत्र सं. आर ओ.आर- II दिनांक 25/11/2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शर्तों के अधीन सभी विल्लंगों से मुक्त , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 31015/7/03

अनुसूची

जिला : अलवर

तहसील : बहरोड़

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं

गाँव का नाम

2181 जैनपुरबास

2123

2126

2120

2044

2048

2050

2051

1913 2. पहाडी

603

501

364

281

271

200

201

928

930

941

46 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

461 (स.रास्ता)

3. मौसमपुर

459

473

531

1379

1429

1432

1430 00

00 672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1. 1927

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : अलवर

तहसील : बहरोड़

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

3 1

4. मोहम्मदपुर

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

11 0

958 (स.चारागाह)

956

926

953

1079

1386

1385

1407

1381

18 0

01 0

18 0

52 0

1380 (स.भूमि)

1411

1878 5. सरविलन्दपुरा

1883

1881

1025

998

213 6. गुजरवास

215

214

220 0

24 0

78 0

16 0

36 0

76 0

48 0

147 (स. रास्ता)

125

116

519 7 . शहजादपुर नांगलिया

518

517

448

408

409

323

315

270

248 0

36 0

45 0

52 0

68 0

13 0

14 0

40(स.रास्ता)

14 8. बर्डोद

1409

1430

1429

1567 0

54 0

18 0

13 0

69 0

971/5014

737

04 0

33 [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

673

जिला : अलवर

तहसील : बहरोड़

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

खसरा सं.

3 1

735 8. बर्डोद (जारी... )

613

599

536

544

281

130 9. बांटखानी

340(स.भूमि)

285(स.भूमि)

351

356 (स.भूमि)

519

525/866

547/867

559 10. कोलीलाराबड

383

390

483

492(स.भूमि)

502(स.भूमि)

501

470

456

446

443

442

435 11. कोलीलाजोगा

635

637

650

687

754

747

454

421

130 12. माजराकाठ

438

435 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

6 0

36 0

30 0

56 0

12 0

08 0

24 0

58 0

44 0

72 0

70 0

66 0

44 0

30 0

00 0

57 0

26 0

28 0

24 0

10 0

72 0

91 0

54 0

39 0

30 0

35 0

44 0

46 0

72 0

58 674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1. 1927

PART II-- SEC. 3 ( i ))

जिला : अलदर

राज्य : राजस्थान तहसील : बहरोड़

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

वर्ग मीटर क्रम सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर

6 1

433

12. माजराकाठ (जारी...)

432

429/767

428

388 (स. चारागाह)

387/784 (स .चारागाह)

377 (स.भूमि)

365

349

347 (स. बरड़ा)

13. कालीपहाडी

106

108

259

266

279 (स.बेहड़)

223 (स.भूमि)

201 (स .रास्ता)

190

24 14. जनकसिंहपुरा

332(स .रास्ता)

44 15. फौलादपुर

25 (स. रास्ता)

13/2097 (स.भूमि)

904

30 16. शाहजहाँपुर

906

972

1001

1002

1007

1008 | भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

675

जिला : अलवर

तहसील : बहरोड़

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

खसरा सं.

1009 16. शाहजहाँपुर (जारी...)

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

ख.सं. 1009 और 782 के बीच में

774

659

667

677

707

495

491

492

464

405

394

395

1228

1305

1316

1322

1334 (स .रास्ता)

1390

1398

1404

1407

1422

1500 (स .रास्ता)

1589

1611

1609

1612

742 17. जोनायचाखुर्द

739

731

710

712

696

695

658

657

54 0

58 0

17 0

33 0

18 0

08 0

28 0

61 0

18 0

19 0

46 0

31 0

47 0

54 0

39 0

55 0

53 0

29 0

49 0

26 0

78 0

84 0

96 0

52 0

25 0

42 0

77 676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

[ PART 11 - SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

जिला : अलवर

तहसील : बहरोड़

क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

3 1

638 17. जोनायचाखुर्द (जारी... )

636 राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

22 0

30 0

637 (स.भूमि)

629

41 0

16 0

625(स.भूमि)

626

621

49 0

620/1849

618

1625 18. गूगलकोटा

452

450 0

40 0

36 0

431/2247

391

380

480

489

499

550

549

529 0

75 0

24 0

08 0

20 0

40 0

540 (स.भूमि)

46 0

539 (स.भूमि)

538 19. कांकर

1675

1676

1671

1670

1631

1666

1632

1650

1649

1646

1638

16 0

23 0

26 0

37 0

42 0

10 0

1615 (स.रास्ता)

1608

1609 0

18 0

01 677 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

तहसील : बहरोड़

जिला : अलवर

राज्य राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

1610

16 19. कांकर (जारी ...)

1601

1598

[फा. सं. आर-31015/73/2004- ओ.आर ॥ ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th January , 2006

S. O. 265. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2411 dated the 01st July , 2005 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 09th July, 2005, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the State of Gujarat to Delhi through Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 26th August, 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of declaration , in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances , subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter no . R- 31015/7/03 OR- II dated 25-11-2004.

55 G1 / 2006-25 [ PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1. 1927

678

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : BEHROR

District: ALWAR

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr. No.

Khasara No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. Name of the Village

6 2

2181

36 1. JAINPURBAS

2123

2126

2120

2044

2048

2050

2051

1913

603

2. PAHADI

501

364

281

271

200

201

928

930

941

00. 08

3. MAUSAMPUR

461( G /L Cart Track)

459

473

531

1379

1429

1432

1430

57 4. MOHAMMADPUR

958 ( G /L Pasture)

956

926

953

01 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3( ii) |

679 State : RAJASTHAN

District : ALWAR

Tehsil : BEHROR

Sr. No.

Khasara No. Name of the Village

1079 4. MOHAMMADPUR ( Contd ... )

1386

1385

1407

1381

1380(G/L)

1411 5. SARVILANDPURA

1878

1883

1881

1025

998 6. GUJARWAS

213

215

214

220

147(G / L Cart Track)

125

116 7. SHAHAJADPUR NANGALIYA

519

518

517

448

408

409

323

315

270

248

40( G / L Cart Track)

14 8. BARDOD

1409

1430

1429

1567

971/5014

737

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

26 0

52 0

24 0

41 0

78 0

76 0

52 0

18 0

36 0

40 0

36 0

46 0

52 0

86 0

13 0

74 0

18 0

54 0

18 0

54 0

69 0

15 0

04 0

33 680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

Tehsil : BEHROR

[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

District: ALWAR

Sr. No.

Khasara No. Name of the Village

735 8. BARDOD ( Contd ... )

613

599

536

544

281

130 9. ΒΑΝΤΚHANI

340(G /L)

285(G/L)

351

356(G/L)

519

525/866

547/867

559

383 10. KOLILARABAD

390

483

492(G/L)

502(G /L)

501

470

456

446

443

442

435 11. KOLILAJOGA

635

637

650

687

754

747

454

421

130 12. MAJRAKATH

438

435 State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

36 0

30 0

26 0

81 0

30 0

08 0

24 0

58 0

44 0

72 0

74 0

44 0

30 0

20 0

46 0

00 0

57 0

26 0

10 0

24 0

72 0

91 0

54 0

30 0

35 0

44 0

46 0

72 0

58 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

681

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

Tehsil : BEHROR

District : ALWAR

Sr. No.

Khasara No. Name of the Village

433 12. MAJRAKATH ( Contd ... )

432

429/767

428

388( G / L Pasture)

387/784(G/ L Pasture)

377(G/L)

365

349

347 ( G / L Barda) 13. KALIPAHADI

106

108

259

266

279(G / L Behad)

223(G/L)

201(G /L Cart Track)

190 14. JANAKSINGHPURA

332(G / L Cart Track)

78 15. FAULADPUR

25(G /L Cart Track)

13/2097( G /L) 16. SHAHJAHANPUR

904

906

972

1001

1002

1007

1008 State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

6 0

40 0

54 0

44 0

72 0

44 0

45 0

36 0

79 0

19 0

35 0

10 0

33 0

55 0

37 0

16 0

36 0

16 0

45 0

05 0

24 0

17 0

18 0

63 0

30 0

25 0

08 0

55 0

35 0

49 0

26 682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1. 1927

District : ALWAR Tehsil: BEHROR

Sr. No.

Khasara No. Name of the Village

1009 16. SHAHJAHANPUR ( Contd ... )

[PART 11 SEC.Sanj State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4

37 0

In Bet Suy No 1009 & 782

774

659

667

677

707

495

491

492

464

405

394

395

1228

1305

1316

1322

58 0

17 0

18 0

76 0

82 0

44 0

61 0

18 0

19 0

46 0

53 0

1334( G /L Cart Track)

1390

1398

1404

1407

1422

47 0

54 0

1500( G /L Cart Track)

1589

1611

1609

1612

742 17. JONAYCHAKHURD

739

731

710

712

696

695

658

657

638

636

53 0

29 0

49 0

96 0

06 0

52 0

72 0

77 0

13 0

637(G/L)

629 0

41 भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

683

District : ALWAR

Tehsil : BEHROR

Sr. No.

Khasara No. Name of the Village

17. JONAYCHAKHURD ( Contd ...)

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

16 0

625(G/L)

626

621 0

95 0

49 0

620/1849

618

1625 18. GUGALKOTA

452

450

17 0

60 0

40 0

431/2247

391

380

480

489

499

550

549

529 0

17 0

50 0

24 0

20 0

72 0

40 0

58 0

540(G/L)

539(G /L)

538 19. KANKAR

1675

1676

1671

1670

1631

1666

1632

1650

1649

1646

1638 0

16 0

08 0

23 0

26 0

37 0

17 0

37 0

0 .

1615 (G/L Cart Track)

1608

1609

1610

1601

1598 0

17 0

[No. R - 31015/73/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) )

नई दिल्ली , 17 जनवरी , 2005

का. आ. 266. - केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खण्ड (क) के अनुसरण में, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 667 (अ ), तारीख 11 मई, 2005 को अधिक्रांत करते हुए सिवाए उन बातों के जो ऐसे अधिक्रमण से पूर्व की गई हैं, या जिन्हें करने का लोप किया गया है, श्री एम. के. अग्रवाल, एडीएम को मैसर्स मेल (इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा मध्य प्रदेश राज्य के जिले मौरैना, ग्वालियर और भिण्ड में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए नियुक्त किया;

और उक्त श्री एम. के. अग्रवाल का स्थानांतरण हो गया है और श्री एस.के. सेवले को उनके पद पर नियुक्त किया गया है;

है; और उक्त श्री एम. के अग्रवाल की मैसर्स गेल (इण्डिया) लिमिटेड के साथ प्रतिनियुक्ति समाप्त हो गई अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 2 के खंड ( क) के अनुसरण में और भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 667 (अ ), तारीख 11 मई, 2005 को अधिक्रांत करते हुए, नीचे दी गई अनुसूची के स्तंभ (1 ) में वर्णित व्यक्ति को उक्त मैसर्स मेल (इण्डिया) लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए निम्नलिखित अनुसूची के स्तंभ (2 ) में वर्णित क्षेत्र में उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए नियुक्त करती है ।

अनुसूची

अधिकारिता का क्षेत्र

व्यक्ति का नाम और पता

(2)

(1)

मध्य प्रदेश राज्य के जिले मोरैना , ग्वालियर और भिण्ड । श्री एस. के. सेवले

ए.डी.एम. , मोरैना,

मानदेय के आधार पर

मैसर्स गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड

जिला: मोरेना,

मध्य प्रदेश

[फा. सं . एल-14014/11/2005- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मंडल , अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

685

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/ माघ 1 , 1927

New Delhi , the 17th January , 2006

S. O. 266. Whereas , in pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government vide Notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O.667( E ) ,dtd. 11th May, 2005 appointed Shri M.K. Agarwal , ADMto perform the functions of the competent authority under said Act for laying of the pipeline by M/s. GAIL ( India) Limited in District Morena , Gwalior and Bhind the state of Madhya Pradesh;

And, whereas , Shri M.K. Agarwal has been trarisferred and Shri S.K. Sable has been posted as his incumbent ;

And , whereas, the deputation of the said Shri M.K. Agarwal with M/ s . GAIL ( India) Limited has come to an erid;

Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause (a) of section (2) of the said Act and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide S.O. 667(E) , dtd . 11th May, 2005, the Central Governmerit hereby authorises the person mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the schedule given below to perform the functions of the Competerit Authority under the said Act for laying pipeliries by the said M/s . GAIL ( India) Limited in the area mentioned in column (2) of the said schedule.

Schedule

Area of Jurisdiction Name and Address of the person

(2)

(1)

Shri S.K. Sable ,

Distt. Morena , Gwalior and Bhind ofMadhya Pradesh State .

ADM Morena on honorarium basis

M/s. GAIL ( India ) Limited ,

Distract: Morena ,

Madhya Pradesh

[F. No. L-14014/11/2005-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy .

55 GI /2006-26 686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 267.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार देना बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण कोल्हापुर के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 11/2001 को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं एल-12012/157/2001- आई आर ( बी-11 ) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2005 S.O. 267. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal , Kolhapur , IT . 11/2001 as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Dena Bank Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-12-2005 .

[No. L - 12012 / 157/2001 - IR ( B - II) ]

B.M. DAVID , Under Sccy.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, MAHARASHTRA AT KOLHAPUR Reference ( IT ) No. 11/2001

Dena Bank Ltd.

Madhav Chambers , 1-398 / A , Senapati Bapat Road , Pune-411016 .

....First Party (Employer) V/ s .

Shri Narendra Manilal Shah Shah - 708 / E4th Lane , Shahupuri . 12, Durga Sagor Apartment Kolhapur.

.... Second Party (Workman)

In the matter of reference under clause ( d ) of sub - section ( 1) and sub - section ( 2A ) of Section 10 of the I.D.Act

CORAM

: M. G. Choudhary , Presiding

Officer .

APPEARANCES : Shri J.M Shaikh ,

Advocate for the Shri D.S. Joshi , First Party

Advocate for the SecondParty.

[PART 11-- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

AWARD

(Dictated in Open Court on 15-11-2005 ) The Central Government being appropriate Government , for the First Party- Industry referred this dispute in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) of sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , referred the dispute between the above narned parties for adjudication of the demands made by the Second Party- Workman , which reads as under:

"Whether the action of the management of Dena Bank, Kolhapur in terminating /discontinuing the services ofShri Narendra Manilal Shah , Daily Deposit Collector w.e.f. 3-5-2000 without following the provisions of Section 25( F) , (G) and ( 11) of 1.D.Act , 1947 is legal and Justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? " 2. The case of the Second- Party - Workman in short , isas under :

Thatthe Second - Party Workman in his statement of claim at Exh.U - 4 contended that , he was working with the First-Party- Bank as a daily deposit collector from 9-10-1978 , continuously till 3-5-2000.It is also contention of the Second-Party-Workman that , initially the agreement was executed regarding the services and the last agreement regarding services was executed on 19-12-1997 for a period ofone year, but after efflux of the period mentioned in the said agreement, the Second- Party- Workman was continued continuously , in the employment of the First- Party-Bank . It is also contention of the Second- Party-Workman that he was given wages based on deposit collected , hence , he is a workman , within the meaning of Section - 2( s ) of the 1.D.Act . According to the Second-Party - Workman , as per decision between the Association of daily deposit collectors against Indian Bank Association , the Second- Party- Workman asked for the reliefs granted by the Industrial Tribunal to the First- Party -Bank . The First- Party- Bank under the spacious plea informed the Second-Party- Workmanthat issue is under appeal and application ofthe Second-Party-Workman will be considered on the out come ofthe decision of writ petition . It is also contention of the Second- Party- Workman that the First- Party has done nothing to implement the decision and to avoid the benefits , the First-Party - Bankby cryptic order/ letter dated 28-4-2000, received by the Second-Party on 2-5-2000 terminated the services ofthe Second- Party- Workman . It is also contention of the Second-Party - Workman that termination of the services of the Second- Party- Workman by the First- Party- Bank from 3-5-2000 is in utter disregards of principles of natural justice and also with undue haste , and in violation ofprovisions of Section -25 ( F) and ( G) ofthe I.D.Act, thus . thetermination effected is illegal and void- ab - initio and lastly requested to allow the reference .

3. The First-Party- Bank in its written- statement at Exh.C- 6 contended that the Second- Party was working as a daily deposit collector for the First Party- Bank during 687

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006 /माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

by the First Party - Bank dated 28-4-2000 discountinuing the contract between the above named parties . Both the parties byjoint pursis at Exh . CU - 1 informed this Tribunal that they do not want to lead any oral evidence in this matter.

7. With the help of material on record , I have heard the arguments of Advocates for both the parties at length and both ofthem have submitted their case as per material on record . In addition to that , the Advocate for both the parties in support of their arguments also relied on the case laws ( 1 ) reported in 2001 , I - CLR Page- 986 ( S.C. ) between Indian Bank . Association V/s . Workmen of Syndicate Bank & Ors . (2) reported in 1997 (3 ) LIN, Page- 111 , between Indian Bank Association /s . Workmen of Syndicate Bank and Ors .

8. The Second- Party- Workman has climed that he was in employment with the First - Party - Bank on commission basis and his commission falls within the definition of Wages under the 1. D. Act , as such , he is a workman , However, the First - Party has disputed in written- statement that the Second- Party is a Workman on the ground that accordingto First - Party - Bank the Second- Party was appointed as per the terms of appointmentto collect daily deposit and on such daily deposit he was paid honorarium by way of commission , as such , according to the First- Party -Bank , the Second- Party is not a workman , within the meaning of I.D. Act . The Hon'ble Supreme Court ofIndia in the case between Indian Bank Association and Workmen of Syndicate Bank and others reported in 2001, 1 CLR at Page 986 , has laid down following ratio:

theperiod from 9-10-1978 to 28-4-2000 and the said post of daily deposit collector not in the staff schedule of the First Party- Bank . The work of collecting daily deposit from the depositors was entrusted to the Second- Party - Workman vide letters of appointment for the period of one year only and this appointment of the Second- Party- Workman was subject to termination of the same at any time and without assigning any reasons , despite his appointment is for one year. According to the First - Party - Bank , the services rendered by the Second Party - Workman was purely on contract basis and hence , reference made by the government is illegal and improper and it is deserved to be dismissed. It is denied that the Second- Party- Workman was continued after efflux of time mentioned in the agreement . According to the First- Party - Bank the Second- Party was never in the employment of the First Party- Bank and he was working as individual contractor , the Second- Party-Workman was never given wages by the First -Party- Bank . It is also contention of the First- Party- Bank that, the Second-Party- Workman was paid honorarium by way of commission on the basis of percentage of the amount of deposits collected by him during the relevant months , thus , he is not a workman , within the meaning of Section2( s ) of 1.D.Act . It is denied that during the period from 1998 there was no agreement . It is also contention of the First-Party- Bank that the termination of the services of the Second- Party- Workman was as per the term mentioned in the agreement . Thus , there is no question of following the provision of Industrial Disputes Act , as such , termination ofagreement on the part of First - Party - Bank was perfectly just and legal and lastly requested to dismiss the reference .

4. Following issues have been framed by my learned predecessor in the matter at Exh.O - 7, which are as under :

(i) Does the Second - Party prove that he is a workman under Section 2( s) of the I.D. Act ?

(ii ) Whether termination /discontinuation of Second-Party is legal and justified?

(iii) To what relief, the Second - Party is entitlecl to, if any?

"Wehave considered the rival submissions . In our view, Mr. Sharma was right when he submitted that on the basis of evidence before it the Tribunal has given findings of fact that the deposit collectors were workmen within the meaning of Section 2 (s) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act . On the evidence on record it could not be said that this findings was unsustainable . Having been shown the relevant evidence we are also of the opinion that the Tribunal correctly arrived at a conclusion that these deposit collectors were workmen . "

(iv) What Order?

5. My findings on the above issues are as under:

(i) Yes

9. Relying on the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India , I hold that the Second - Party is a workman , within the meaning of Section 2 (s) of Industrial Disputes Act , hence , I answer issue No.1 in the affirmative .

(ii) No

(iii) The Second-Party - Workman is entitled for lumsum compensation .

(iv) The Reference is party allowed .

REASONS

10 It is contention of the Second- Party- Workman, thathe worked with the First- Party - Bank from 9-10-1978 continuously till 3-5-2000 , as a daily deposit collector and the First-Party - Bank terminated his services on 3-5-2000 , in utter disregards of principles of natural justice , with undue haste and also in violation of provision of Section 25(F) & (G ) of the 1.D. Act , as such , his termination is illegal andwrongful.

Boththe parties have produced documents on re cord viz. letter of appointment of the Second- Party- Workı nan , issued by the First- Party - Bank time to time, letter is sued

On the other hand the First- Party -Bank in written statement at Exh.C - 6 taken a stand that the Second- Party 688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

canbe absorbed as regular employees all ofthem have to be treated as only one category . We would hence uphold and apply the decision of the Tribunal of payment of full back- wages and incentive commission as well as conveyance allowance and gratuity to the deposit collectors as workmen . The award stands modified accordingly" .

was appointed for a specific period stipulated in the agreement for the period from 9-10-1978 to 28-4-2000 and the termination of the services of Second - Party - workman has been effected as per term of contract/ agreement , as such it was not necessary for the First- Party- Bank to comply the mandatory provisions of 1.D. Act , as such , action of the First- Party- Bank isjust , legal and proper . In this respect Advocate for Second- Party- Workman has strongly relied on the case law reported 1997 (3 ) LLN Page 111 between Indian Bank Association Bombay- Syndicate Bank & Workmen of Syndicate Bank in which Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court has laid down following ratio:

11. I have already pointed out the contentions of both the parties in this reference . Accordingto the First- Party-Bank , the Second-Party - Workman was appointed for specific period mentioned in the contract of employment entered into between the paties , every year , as such , as per the terms of contract termination has been effected . In my opinion , the First- Party - Bank cannot take a stand in its defense in view of provisions of Section - 2 ( oo) ( bb) of the I.D. Act, for the contract being terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein , for the simple reason that Section - 2 ( oo ) ( bb ) has been broght in the Statute w.e.f. 18-8-1984 and appointment of the Second- Party- Workman has been madeby the First- Party- Bank from 9-10-1978 , as such , according to me defence under Section -2 (oo ) (bb) is not available to the First - Party-Bank . The First-Party - Bank itself has admitted in the written- statement at Exh . C- 6, that the Second-Party-Workman was working with the First - Party - Bank during the period from 9-10-1978 to 28-4-2000, thus , taking into consideration this admission of the First- Party- Bank in the written statement, I have no hesitation to hold that the Second- Party- Workman was in the employment with the First-Party - Bank continuously and it was obligatory on the part of the First- Party-Bank to follow mandatory provisions of Section - 25 ( F) of I.D. Act . , at the time of termination of services of the Second-Party - Workman . the discontinuation/ termination letter issued by the First- Party- Bank dated 28-4-2000 at Sr. No. 3 with list Exh . U- 6 reads as under :

" Ref. No. Kop/ DDS/ 28-4-2000

Dena Bank Shahupuri Branch , 357, Shahupuri , Kolhapur .

Shri Narendra M. Shah Shahupuri , Kolhapur .

DearSir,

Ref.: Daily Deposit Scheme

Withreference to above we deserve to inform you that our higher Authority, as a policy matter has Discontinued our Daily Deposit Scheme with an immediate effect . It has been informed by them vide letter No. RO/ PER/ EBR/ 5807 dt . 24-4-2000.

You are instructed not to accept any deposit money under Daily Deposit Scheme with an immediate effect.

"A further question has been raised by Shri K.Srinivasa Murthy of the depsosit collectors being intrinstically not able to be treated as workmen since in the event of they being treated so , the provisions of Chap. V - A of the Industrial Disputes Act would not be workable in relation to them . It is the argument that since their remuneration is not fixed and is variable , they cannot be paid any determined amount as is required under S. 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act , in the event of their retrenchment. Wedo not think that this argument halts the conclusion oftheir being treated as workmen since it is by now well settled that even job -rated and piece- rated workers can be workmen as was pointed out in S.I.T. house case (vide supra) , and some other cases . On conspectus of the consideration , we hence reach the conclusion that the deposit collectors are workmen of the respective banks though they are not , and also cannot claim to be regular employees . In view of the conclusion it necessarily follows that the scheme evolved by the Tribunal in Para.69 of the award for absorption of the deposit collectors below the age of45 years as on October 3 , 1980 , has to go . But the award also directed the deposit cllectors above the age of 45 years and those who are unwilling to be absorbed as regular employees to be paid full back wages of Rs.750 - per month linked with minimum deposit of Rs.7,500 /- per month plus the incentive remuneration at 2 percent for collection of over and above Rs.7,500/ - . Besides , such non - absorbed deposit collectors were also made entitled to conveyance allowance of Rs.50/- per month for deposits of less than 10,000/- and Rs.100 per month for deposits of more than 10,000 upto or above Rs . 30,000 per month . Besides , they were also entitled to gratuity of 15 days commission for each year of service renderd ."

Your contract with us for colleciton of money under Daily Deposit Scheme is discontinued with immediate effect .

It is further observed that " Now that we find that all deposit collectors are only workmen and non 689 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

This is for your information .

Thanking you ,

Yoursfaithfully ForDena Bank Kolhapur.

Received under protest .

Sd/-

whether he is gainfully employed or not and thereafter, burden will be shifted on the First- Party- Bank to prove thatthe Second- Party -Workman is gainfully employed. As the Second-Party- Workman has not entered in the witness box, and discharged his burden about discloser of the gainful employment , as such , as a matter of right the Second-Party -Workman cannot claim full back wages from the First- Party-Bank .

3-5-2000

Branch Manager

14. The Advocate for the Second- Party- Workman submitted that as the Second- Party - Workman is reaching the age of superannuation w.e.f. 31-3-2006 , as such , he may be given all legal dues , including full back wages , till the date of superannuation i.e. 31-3-2006 , instead of granting reinstatement in service and in this respect Advocate for Second- Party-Workman submitted that the Second-Party- Workman has already put on record at Exh . U-7 the calculations of amount to which he is entitled from the First- Party - Bank till 31-3-2006 and again the Advocate for Second- Party - Workman submitted that the said calculations are based on award passed by the Tribunal and as per the decision of Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Courtreported in 1997 (3 ) LLN Page 111 ( supra) . To this , the advocate for the First- Party -Bank has strongly objected and submitted that as per the decision of Tribunal and as perthe decision of Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court, an amount of Rs. 24 , 133 /- is already been paid to Second- Party-Workman and the claim made by the Second - Party- Workman vide Exh . U- 7 is exorbit an also illegal and that cannot be granted . The- First- Party - Bank vide say Exh. C-14 strongly objected the application at Exh . U- 7 and calculations made therein . According to the Advocate for the First-Party- Bank the award terms has been modified by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court , nowhere indicted effective date of implementation , hence , date of order passed by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court ought to have been taken as date for the calculations for the legal dues and that has been paid to the Second- Party-Workman .

12. After perusal of the aforesaid letter , it is clear to me that the First- Party- Bank has not given just and proper reasons for the termination of the services of the Seond- Party-Workman . The First- Party - Bank in the aforesaid letter contended that as per the decision of higher authorities , as a policy matter the First- Party- Bank has discontinued daily deposit scheme. In my opinion , before effecting the termination of the services of Second - Party - Workman or before discontinuing the contract between above named parties , it was obligatory on the part of the First- Party- Bank to follow the principles of natural justice , atleast it was necessary to the First- Party - Bank to give show cause notice to the Second- Party - Workman , before effecting the termination of the contract and that has not been done by the First - Party- Bank . Secondly , as per the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 (F ) of I.D. Act , it was obligatory on the part of the First - Party- Bank to give retrenchment compensation and to give one month's notice or notice pay in lieu ofnotice to the Second - Party- Workman, before effecting the termination , that has not been done , The First- Party-Bank has filed Affidavit of Shri S.Y. Vidhate at Exh . C- 11 , in which it is contended in the affidavit that daily depositscheme is in force only in J.B. Aurangabad Branch ofPune Region and in all other branches of Denk Bank daily deposit scheme is discontinued . If this affidavit- evidence is taken into consideration , I have not hesitaton to hold that the First- Party- Bank has also violated the principles of ' last come, first go ' , while terminating the services of the Seond - Party - Workman , as the Second- Party- Workman was appointed in the year 1978. Thus , for all these reasons the Second- Party- Workman has proved that the First - Party - Bank terminated /discontinued his services illegally, wrongfully and in violation of provisions ofSection - 25 ( F ) & ( G ) of the I.D. Act and also with undue haste , as such , the termination of services of Second-Party- Workman is not legal and justified , hence , I answer issue No. 2 in the negative.

15. As this Tribunal has declared the termination of the services of the Second- Party - Workman is not legal andjustified , as such the Second- Party- Workman is entitled for the reliefs . However, taking into consideration the aspects that the First- Party- Bank has effected termination of services of the Second- Party - Workman illegaly , the Second-Party- Workman is reaching age of superannuation w.e.f. 31-3-2006 and the claim made by the Second- Party- Workman in lieu of reinstatement vide Exh . U - 7 and taking into considration about the demand of legal dues of gratuity cannot computed and adjudicated in the present reference, as the gratuity has to be claimed under the Gratuity Actas the Gratuity Act is a complete code itself, taking into consideration that First - Party - Bank has already paid to the Second-Party- Workman an amount of Rs . 24,133/- and taking into consideration the service of the Second- Party- Workman terminated by the First-Party- Bank w.e.f. 3-5-2000 from the date of receipt of termination order by the Second- 13. In view of my findings on issue No. 2 in the negative as above , as a normal rule , the Second- Party- Workman is entitled for the relief of reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages . However , now it is well settled position of law that whenever , back wages to be awarded , it was obligatory on the part of Second- Party- Workman to step in witness box and disclose before the court that what efforts he has made to minimize the loss suffered by him , because of the termination . It is for the Second- Party - Workmanto disclose before the Court 690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

Party- Workman , the date of termination , date of supernnuation of the Second- Party- Workman and the date ofdecision of this reference , there is very short period and hence, in my opinion grant reinstatement in this matter is notjust and proper . As such , considering all these aspects , in my opinion an amount of Rs . 50,000/ - lumsum compensation it has of reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is just and proper relied in this matter. I make it clear that this amount of Rs . 50,000/- is excluding the amount of gratuity and amount i.e. Rs . 24,133 / -already paid to the Seeond-Party- Werkman ,by the First- Party-Bank . The First-Party-Bank is under obligation to make payment of amount of gratuity to the Seeond-Party- Workman as per law. Thus, having regard to the faets and eircumstances of the case , this is just and proper relief in this matter to which the Second- Party - Workman is entitled from the First- Party - Bank , hence, I answer issue No. 3 accordingly.

16. In view of my findings on issues No. 3 , as above , I hold that reference is liable to be party allowed and accordingly, I proceed to pass following award:

AWARD

(i) The Reference ( IT) No. 11/2001 is partly allowed.

(ii) It is hereby declared that action of the Dena Bank , Kolhapur in terminating/discontinuing services of Shri N.M , Shah -Daily deposit collector w.e.f. 3-5-2000 is not legal and justified.

(iii ) The First-Party - Dena Bank is directed to pay Rs. 50,000 /- as lumsum compensation to the Second-Party- Workman viz Shri N.M. Shah in lieu of reinstatement in service with continuity and back wages .

( iv) Ne order as to costs .

(v) Award accordingly .

(vi ) Copy of this Award be sent to appropriate Government for further action .

Kolhapur

Date: 15-11-2005 M.G. CHOUDHARY, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 268 . औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार वैस्टर्न इण्डिया शिपयार्ड लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. -2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 8/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-12- 2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

सं. एल-36011 / 13/2002- आई आर (बी- II) ]

बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2005 S.O. 268. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.8/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. 2 , Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western India Shipyard Ltd.and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-12-2005 .

[No. L- 36011 / 13 /2002 - IR ( B- II ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO.2, AT MUMBAI

B.I. Kazi , Presiding Officer PRESENT

REFERENCE No. CGIT - 2/8 of 2003 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF WESTERN INDIA SHIPYARD LIMITED , GOA

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

(Representedby Goa Trade and Commercial Workers Union)

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Shri R.N. Shah , Advocate

FOR THE WORKMAN : Mr. Suhaas Naik , Advocate

Mumbai , dated the , 7th November 2005

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , by its order No. L - 36011 / 13 /2002 - IR( B - II ) dated 13-01-2003 in exereise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Indistrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :----

SCHEDULE

" Whether the Charter of Demands contained in the letter dated 22-10-2001 ( Annexure ) by The Goa Trade and Commercial Workers ' Union against the management of Western India Shipyard Limited, Goa isjustified ? If so , what relief the workmen are entitled to?"

2. On receipt of the order of Referenee from the Government, notices were issued to the Management and the Union (Ex . 2) . Union filed Statement of Claim ( Ex . 5) . Management filed its Written Statement ( Ex . 17 ) . Union also filed Rejoinder ( Ex . 18 ) . Issues were framed (Ex . 19) . The matter was thereafter adjourned for evidence from time [ भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

to time . Today both the parties remained present. Union filed application for passing an Award in terms of the settlement ( Ex.31 ) dated 05-04-2004 for which Management has no objection . In view of the above , the Reference needs to be disposed of. Therefore , following order is passed .

ORDER

Reference stands disposed of as settled in terms of settlement vide Ex. 31 .

B. 1. KAZI , Presiding Officer Memorandum of settlement under section 12 ( 3 ) read with section 18 (3 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Vasco- Da-Gama , Goa on 5-4-2004 between the management of M /s. Western India Shipyard Limited ( WISL) and Goa Trade and Commercial Workers Union (AITUC) , Goa , over their charter of demands served on the management by the union .

File No. VA-6 (19)/03-04 Dated 5th April , 2004 .

NAME OF THE PARTIES

Representing the Union Representing the Management

1. Mr. Anil Kumar (DGM-Pers & HR)

1. Mr. Christopher Fonseca (President ) 2. Mr. Manish Singh (Exe . Asst . to MD)

2. Mr. Suhas Naik (Secretaray)

3. Mr. Prakash Naik (Local Committee) (DM-Pers & IR) 3. Mr. Subodh K. Gautam

4. Mr. Edward D ' Cruz (LocalCommittee)

5. Mr. Alex PacheCo (LocalCommittee)

6. Mr. Damu Popkar (LocalCommittee)

7. Mr. Mario Fernandes (LocalCommittee)

8. Mr. Salim Sayed (Local Committee) SHORT RECITAL OF THE CASE The President , Goa Trade and Commercial Workers Union , Goa (hereinafter referred to as the Union ) vide his representation under reference No. 1.1 WISL Canteen Rest Room/2004 dated 11-3-2004 has raised certain demands against the Management of M/ s . Western India Shipyard Ltd. , Goa (hereinafter referred to as the Managernent) and stated that the workinen of the Manageinent are put to great hardship because of non - redressal of their grievances by the management. Discussions were held with both the parties on various dates . The Union also threatened to resortto direct action in case of any delay in resolving the issues . Accordingly , the matter was seized in conciliation and during the course of conciliation proceedings were held on 5-4-2004 after protracted and prolonged discussions and delibrations and as a result of the persuation made by

691

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central) , Vaso - Da- Gama, Goa, both the parties agreed to resolve the issue amicably and arrived at Memorendum of Settlement signed between the parties before the ALC( C) , Vasco , on 5-4-2004 onthe following terms and conditions :

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

1. It is agreed thatw.e.f. 01st April , 2004 each workmen on the permanent rolls of the company on 1st April , 2004 shall be paid a total increase in wages amounting to Rs . 2500/- per month which shall be distributed among various heads in the existing wage structure as under :-

25.00%

Basic Pay

31.67%

DA ( incl . VDA & FDA)

HRA

06.25%

10.00%

DTA

15.00%

Conveyance Allowance

10.00%

Washing Allowance

LTA

02.08%

The above percentage excluding Basic and DA, HRA & LTA are indicative and marginal variation in percentage of Conveyance Allowance and or Washing Allowance, if required, shall be made to ensure that each workmen gets total benefit of not less than Rs . 2500 per month as on 1-04-2004.

2. In accordance with para 2 above the wage structure shall be revised w.e.f. 1-04-2004 as detailed hereafter .

3. Pay scales :

It is agreed between the parties that the pay scale shall be revised w.e.f 01st April 2004. The existing and Corresponding Revised scales of pay are at Annexure -1 .

4. Dearness allowance (DA) :

Itisagreed between the parties that the existing Fixed Dearness Allowance ( FDA) shall be replaced by a revised Dearness Allowance ( DA) consisting of Fixed Dearness Allowance (FDA ) & Variable Dearness Allowance (VDA) .

(a) Fixed Dearness Allowance ( FDA) : All the workmen shall be paid a FDA of Rs . 1771.75/ - (Rs . 1150 +621.75) per month .

(b) Variable Dearness Allowance ( VDA) : It is agreed between the parties that VDA shall be paid on the basis of Average All India Consumer Price Index ( AAICPI ) ( 1960 = 100) beyond the Base index of2400. w.e.f. 01st April , 2004 the VDA shall be computed and paid as under:-

(i ) The VDA shall be paid for every point of rise and fall in AAICPI ( 1960-100) over Base 2400 points@ Rs . 2 per point.

692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

(ii) The quarterly index of AAICPI shall be calculated as under : -

Months of payable Month of Reckoning

Oct. Nov. Dec ( Previous Year) AprilMay June Jan, Feb , Mar

July, August, September April ,May, June

October , November December July, Aug, Sept

January, February, March (Following year)

5. Fitment formula /Annual Increment : --It is agreed between the Union and the Management that the fitment formula should be as under :

(i ) The Basic Pay of all the permanent workmen on the roils ofthe Management as on 01st April 2004 shall be fitted in the corresponding revised seales of pay after adding an amount of Rs.625 ( i.e.25% of Rs.2500- ) to the existing Basic pay and fitted at the corresponding equivalent stage in the revised scale of pay and in case no such stage is available the pay shall be fitted at the next higher stage in the corresponding revised scale of a pay , Examples of the Fitment are at Annexure - II ,

(ii) In case the basic pay after adding an amount of Rs. 625 - as above exceeds the maximum in the revised scale , the amount in excess of the maximum of the scale shall be paid as Personal Pay . This Personal Pay shall be treated as Baxic Pay for all purposes.

(iii) Aworkmen who subsequently reaches maximum of the scale will be granted Personal Pay equivalent to the last drawn increment from the date he/she is eligible for his next normal increment.

(iv) Workmen shall be granted Annual increments on 1st of April every year.

6. House Rent Allowance:

It is agreed between the Union and the Management that the HRA shall be paid at the rate of25 % of the revisedi Basic salary w.e.f.01st April 2004.

7. Conveyance Reimbursement : It is agreed between the Union and Management that w.e.f. 1-04-2004 every workmen shall be paid the Conveyance reimbursement at the following rates:

Revised Grade

Pre- revised

Rs. 300

Rs. 675 (i) Unskilled

Rs. 350

Rs. 725 (ii) Semiskilled

Rs. 775

Rs. 400

( iii ) Skilled GR - 1

GR- II

Rs . 400

Rs . 775

Rs . 800

Rs . 425

(iv) Highly Skilled

Rs . 825

RS . 450

(v) Leadhand

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii)] 8. Domicilary Treatment Allowance ( DTA) : It is agreed between the Union and Management that w.e.f. 1-04-2004 the DTA shall be revised and paid at the following rate:

Revised Grade

Pre- revised

Rs. 650

Rs . 400

Unskilled

(i)

Rs . 425

Rs. 675 Semiskilled

(ii)

Rs . 695

Rs. 445

(iii)

Rs . 695

Rs . 445

Skilled GR- 1 GR- 11

Rs. 705

Rs . 455

(iv) Highly Skilled

Rs . 710

Rs. 460

(v) Leadhand

9. Washing Allowance : It is agreed between the Union and Management that the existing system of supplying soap shall be discontinued and the amount of Rs . 15 being paid in lieu of supply of soap shall be merged with the Washing Allowance . It is agreed that w.e.f. 1-04-2004 Washing Allowance shall be revised and paid as under:

Revised

Pre- revised

Scaleof Pay

Rs. 625 Unskilled

Rs. 375

(i)

Rs. 665

Rs. 415

Semiskilled

(ii)

Rs . 690 Skilled GR- 1

Rs. 440

(iii)

Rs . 690

Rs. 440

GR- II

RS . 695

Rs. 445

(iv) Highly Skilled

Rs. 735

Rs. 485

Leadhand

(A)

With effectfrom 1-04-2004 the workman shall not be entitled for soap or cash in lieu of soap as the same has been merged in the revised structure with Washing Allowance as stated herebefore .

10. Leave Travel Allowance ( LTA ) : It is agreed between the Union and Management that LTA equivalent to one month's basic pay per annum shall continue to be paid to the workmen as per the existing practice & rules and instructions .

under: The Salient features of the scheme are inter -alia as (i ) In order to avail LTA the workmen must avail minimum 4 ( four ) days of Earned Leave during the calendar year.

(ii) For claiming reimbursement he must submit proof having performed the journey.

11. Promotions :

(i) The minimum eligibility criteria for promotior .to the next higher grade shall be 3 yesrs in the existing grade . However in exceptional cases where the workmen performance has been outstanding , the above eligibility criteria may be relaxed by the departmental Promotion Committee . ( DPC) भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006 /माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(ii) All the promotions shall be on the basis of Merit cum Seniority.

(iii ) Any workmen whose performance has not been found satisfactory and has been rated as poor or average will be replaced by another suitable person after giving him adequate and fair opportunity to improve his performance and due notice .

12. Period Settlement :

It isagreed between the Union and Management that the period of settlement shall be for Four years i.e. from 01-10-2001 to 30-09-2005 .

13. Production Incentive :

(i) It is agreed between the Union and Management that keeping in view the improved performance of the Management in the past every permanent workmen on the permanent rolls of the Management as on 01st April 2004 will be paid as separate , one time production incentive limited to the period 1-10-2001 to 31-03-2004 as follows:

Period

Amount

(a) 1-10-2001 to 31-3-2003 Rs.2000 p.m. per workmen

(b)1-04-2003 to 31-03-2004 Rs.2500 -pm. per workmen

(ii) It is agreed between the Union and Management that the arrears of above Production Incentive shall be paid in 12(tweleve) monthly equal installments from the month of April2004. The amount af Rs.1500 -per month already paid as ad-hoc for the period from 01-04-2003 to 31-03-2004 to the workmen shall be adjusted and deducted from the amount of arrears of Production Incentive .

14. Protective Gear:

It is agreed that the existing system of supply of protective gears viz . boiler suit safety shoes , raincoats, helmets , etc. shall continue .

15. Over Time:

(a) The Management representative informed that the rate of over time wages has already been revised and the workmen are entitled to over time wages at double the rate of ordinary rate of wages i.e. (BASIC FDA & VDA PP ) forworking beyond scheduled hours of work .

(b) It is agreed that as and when required the workmen shall work on avertime for which overtime wages (BASIC+ FDA & VDA+ PP) shall be paid by the Management .

(c) It is agreed that on holidays or days of strike , work stoppages essential services shall be maintained and the required workmen in essential services departments viz . ( Fire & Safety, Maintenance , Electrical , Ship Services , Shipwright etc ) shall perform duties on such days.

(d) It is agreed that the pay slip being issued to the workmen should inter- alia contain details of overtime 55 Gl / 2006-27

693 worked during the previous month , P.F A/ c no . & details of deduction etc.

16. Death Benefit :-

(i) The Management informed that the benefit under the Death Benefit Scheme have already been revised upward for all the workmen .

(ii) Under the scheme following benefits are granted to the workmen :

(a) In case of death of workman , an amount of Rs. 75,000/- shall be paid to the next of kin of the deceased workman.

(b) The management shall try to provide job to the next ofkin of the workmen who dies in an accident arising outofand in the course of employment .

17. Leave & Holidays :

The management informed that the number ofdays of Casual Leave ( CL) and Sick Leave (SL) has already been revised with effect from 1-1-2004 as under:

(i ) Casual Leave 10 days per annum

( ii ) Sick Leave 10 days per annum and can be accumulated upto maximum of 40 days .

( iii) Earned Leave 25 days per annum and can be accumulated upto maximum of 100 days .

18. Date of Payment :

The wages to the workmen shall be paid by some of following month . However , there may be delay of few days due to shortage of funds .

19. General:

1. Industrial Relations :

(a) It is agreed that in order to promote harmonious Industrial Relations the Workmen shall not resort to direct action and all the differences and disputes shall be settled through bilateral discussions and dialogue .

(b) It is agreed that the workmen shall fully cooperate in the constitution of statutory committees required under the different statutes viz . Works Committee , CanteenCommittee Safety Committee, etc. and they will fully participate in the discussion , with the prime objective ofimprovement in Safety standards , welfare measures . production productivity and improvement in quality ofwork life.

(c) It is agreed that Union and Workmen shall not resort to strike, go slow tactics or any other form of agitation during the currency of this settlement on the issues covered under this settlement save as per clause 19( iv) of this settlement .

(d) It is agreed that the workmen shall make every effort to reduce absenteeism and strictly follow the procedure for sanction of leave.

694

[ PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

(e) It is agreed to cooperate and maintain discipline at all levels it is further agreed that to improve the delivery schedules of the Vessels be improved by contributing maximum towards production and productivity .

( IV) It is agreed that if any conflicts of interest arise out of the interpretation or implementation of this settlement , those shalt be resolved by peaceful and legitimate means , by mutual discussion and/or through the machinery provided by law .

(V) Facilities , benefits , privileges and other conditions of services which are presently enjoyed by the workmenand including duties and responsibilities , hitherto performed and which are not specifically altered , amended orsubstituted, by this settlement , shall remain unchanged.

(VI ) The Management and the Union agreed to file the implementation report before Assistant Labour Commissioner- Central on or before 16th May , 2004.

( f) Industrial Relation Cell: It is agreed that an Industrial Relation Cell shall be constituted to oversee the different welfare facilities within the yard and organise different recreational programmes for the workmen and their family members. In IR Cell two workmen will be nominated every month by rotation from different departments . The locker room , resa room and toilets shall be adequately equipped and maintained by the Management . The Industrial Relation Cell shall comprise of two workmen to be nominated from the different departments every month and one official of the Management . The nomination shall be made by the Managing Director .

The IR Cell shali be responsible for :

It is mutually agreed that neither the concerned workmen either directly or through any Union will raise any dispute before any Authority or non - statutory forum nor any dispute will be raised in respect of this Settlement.

(i) Day to day activity of the canteen , upkeep and cleanliness of the locker room , rest room , washing places , all the toilets , urinals, bathing facility of the workmen of the yard .

The parties will submit their implementation Report to this Office on or before 31-10-2004 failing which the settlement will be treated as implemented.

Name of the Parties

(ii) Grievance of the workmen to be taken up with the appropriate authorities and settlement of the same .

Representing the Union

Representing the Management

(iii) Issuance of safety gears .

Name

Signature

(iv) This committee shall participate as special invitee in all the committees constituted for safety, welfare etc.

Sd/-

Christopher Fonseca

Sd/- Illegible

Illegible

1. Anil Kumar- DGM - Pers and HR

(v)The IR Cell shall work in coordination with the Personnel department and the officer looking after the IR shall be overall incharge of the cell .

Sd/-

Suhaas Naik

2. Manish Singh

( 11 ) Production & Productivity:

Illegible

Sd/- Illegible

Ex. Asstt . to MD

Prakash V.

Nai

3. Subodh Gautam Sd/- Dy . Manager Illegible

Sd/-

Maato

Farnades Illegible (a) It is agreed that both Management and Workmen shall strive and work to achieve high level of efficiency and performance and improve production , productivity and profitability by effective handling of resources , reducing wastage, improving quality and minimising cost. It is agreed that the workmen shall put in their best to improve the present productivity level .

Edward D'auz Sd/-

Illegible

Salim Sayed Sd/- Illegible

Alex Pachno Sd/-

Illegible

Dann Lpopim Sd/-

Illegible

(b) It is agreed that in order to achieve optimum utilisation of resources and career plan and career growth ofworkmen, they can be re - deployed and redistributed as per their qualifications , experience and skills whenever required without adversely affecting their pay , Scale of pay & other service condition . It is agreed that the Management shall provide adequate training to the workmen in order to improve the quality of their skills , keeping in view the modernisation and technological changes and challenges .

10 .

11 .

( PANKAJ DUBEY)

Date: 05-04-2004 Date: 05-04-2004

Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Central)

Vascoda gamma , Goa .

( 111 ) All the demands mentioned in the Charter of Demand dated 22-10-2001 including revised/additional demands not covered in this settlement will be treated as having been settled conclusively . The Union agreed to withdraw case no. CGIT2 / 8 of 2002 , pending before Central Government Industrial Tribunal - 2 , Mumbai within two months of signing of this settlement.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2005 का. आ.269 . औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण कोझीकोड II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 4/01 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/269/98- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2005 S.O. 269. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal Kozhikode, II (4/01) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-12-2005.

[No. L - 12012/269/ 98 - IR (B - II ) ]

B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

IN THE LABOUR COURT , KOZHIKODE , KERALA STATE.

Dated 2nd day of November, 2005 THIS THE PRESENT :

Shri K. Balasubramanian, B. Com . , LL.B. , Presiding Officer

L.D. (C) No. 4/01

Between :-

The Regional Manager ,

Regional Office, Canara Bank ,

Calicut-4

......Management

AND

Sh . T.E. Augusty ,

S/ o . Sh . Ignatious ,

Thekkekaithakkal House ,

Ambukuthy Maidanam , Mananthavady,

695

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

AWARD

The worker involved in the dispute was engaged as a deposit collection agent in the Mananthavadi branch of the management bank. Allegedly on the basis of certain allegations of mis - appropriation and misplacement of funds collected from the depositors and after conducting an intemal investigation the services of the worker was terminated by invoking the relevant clause in the service agreement . Aggrieved, the present dispute was raised by the worker and was eventually referred to this Court by the Government of India , Ministry of Labour by an Order No. L - 12012/269 /98 -IR (B- II) dated 30-8-2001 to adjudicate the justifiability or otherwise of the action of management .

2. The case of the worker is that he joined the service of the management on 5-12-1983 . He was authorised by the Bank to canvass and collect Nityanidhi deposits . He was discharging duties promptly , honestly and delegently. While so , on 16-8-1997 management terminated the services of the worker without issuing any show cause notice or calling explanation or conducting any enquiry . The action of the management is illmotivated , illegal and an act of victimisation . The relevant clause in the service agreement which was invoked by the management to terminate the service of the worker is arbitrary , oppressive and unsustainable . The Supreme Court has also held that the deposit collection agents are the workmen of the bank. Under these circumstances worker prays for reinstatement in service with backwages and continuity in service .

Workman

Wayanad-670 645.

REPRESENTATIONS :

Sri P.M. Padmanabhan , Advocate ,

Calicut

ForManagement

.For Workman.

Sri P.S. Murali , Advocate , Calicut.

3. The management disputes the very employer- employee relationship . According to them the worker involved in the dispute is not a workman under the management . He was only engaged under a contract of agency. The deposit collectors have been bestowed with the status of the workman for some restricted purposes . In terms of the agreement NNND agents are required to remit their previous day's collection in the bank on the very next working day . The worker failed to strictly comply with the stipulations and promptly deposit the amounts so collected. Meanwhile , several complaints were received from the customers noticing discrepensies in the balance in their accounts and non - accounting of deposits . The complaints were got investigated through a Senior Officer of the bank . It was revealed that the worker was in the habit of misappropriating money by changing the dates in the collection slips and receipts and by taking collection without issuing proper vouchers . As the very conduct of the worker badly affected the image of the bank , his services were terminated by invoking clause 10 of the agency. agreement . The action is not tainted on any grounds . There is also no arbitrariness or illegality in the relevant clause under the service agreement . The action of the management is legal and valid. The worker is not also 696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] liable to be absorbed in service as he has abused the trust and confidence reposed on him by the bank . The reference is also bad as has been done on the strength of a subsequent decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court which has no retrospective operation . Evidence consists of the oral evidence of MWs 1 to 3 and documentary evidence Exts . Mi to M 9 , M9 ( a) and Exts . WI to marked.

4. The points that arise for determination are :-

( 1 ) Whether the reference is bad as contended?

(2) Whether the worker involved in the dispute is a workman of the management?

worker was terminated . Ext . M2 series are duplicates and Ext . M3 series are the originals allegedly issued by the parties suspecting commission of fraud from the side of the worker . The witness also deposed about the procedure of deposits of previous day's collection in the Bank by the NNND agents . MW2 , another officer of the same branch also give evidence in the same line . MW3 , as already stated is the officer who conducted the internal investigation into the allegations against the worker . This witness stated about the details of investigation conducted. According to him on the materials , he found out some irregularities and discrepancies in the work and conduct of the worker and lapses on the part of the Bank Supervisors .

(3) Whether the charges against the worker stands proved by evidence?

(4) Whether the impugned punishment of termination of the workman from service is proportionate to the misdemeanour committed? If not , further reliefs liable to be granted?

(5) Point No. 1 : This issue was already answered as per Preliminary Order in M.Ρ. 34/04 .

(6) Point No. 2 : This point was also considered as a preliminary point and found that the worker involved in the dispute is a worker of the managennentnaent within S.2 ( s ) of the Act as per order dated 29-6-2005 .

(7) Point No. 3 : The impugned action against the

worker was initiated by the management for violation of clause 10 ( v) of Ext . MJ agency agreement on the allegation that the worker mis- appropriated or misplaced the amounts collected from the depositors . This was done on the basis of two written complaints and oral complaints of certain customers after conducting an internal investigation and without conducting any domestic enquiry or framing charges . So the management was granted an opportunity to substantiate the charges and accordingly evidence was taken . MWs 1 to 3 are the witnesses examined of the management to prove their case . Worker did not adduce any further evidence .

9. Though the management made special reference about two written complaints of customers and oral complaints of some others , none of them were examined nor the letters properly proved in evidence . It could be seen from the evidence that complaints were made only an entertaining some suspicion over the conduct of the worker . Even according to MWI , management has not verified the total amounts remitted by the complaints . The worker was not the custodian of Ext . M7 collection issue book, verified and initialled in due course by the Superior Officers could also further be seen from his evidence . The witness was also not able to identify the person responsible for making the so - called corrections in the receipts and further admitted that he is not in a position to speak the full details of all the allegations levelled against the worker . MW2 admitted that he has no direct knowledge about the author of the entire entries made in Ext . M7 and that he had not occasion to note any irregularities in the work and conduct of the worker during his tenure . MW3 conceded that the fact finding enquiry was made without hearing the worker . The impugned action was taken without issuing any show cause notice to the worker , framing any charge - sheet or even conducting any domestic enquiry after hearing the worker . The fact finding investigation report has no legal sanction and the entire proceedings are vitiated on account of non - adherence to the principles of natural justice . Shortly , the management has not succeeded in proving the charge of mis - conduct against the worker by adducing cogent and satisfactory evidence.

10. The learned counsel for the management vehemently contended that the main question involved is whether the worker being an agent working on contract basis is entitled to any enquiry or not.

11. Service conditions of the worker are governed by the stipulations in Ext.Pl agreement . Clause 10 ( b ) of Ext. MJ service agreement enables the bank to terminate the agency in its absolute discretion without any prior notice at any time , without assigning any reason whatsoever . It further provides that the worker shall not 8. MWI is the then Manager of the Mananthavadi branch of the management bank where the worker was working as an agent . MWI stated in evidence that several complaints of commission of malpractice and mis - appropriation of funds by making fictitious entries in the Bank books were received against the worker , that on finding some irregularities he forwarded Ext . M4 report to the Deputy General Manager and thereafter he recommended for an investigation . Accordingly an internal investigation was conducted by M'W3 and on the basis of the report the service of the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

be entitled to question such termination in any manner .

697

भारत को राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

Document marked from the side of the Workman:-

Ext . WI .. Letter sent by the Senior Manager of Canara Bank , Mananthavadi to the worker T.E. Augusty dt . 9-2-98 .

Documents marked from the side of the Management :-

Ext. Ml Agreement in between Canara Bank and the worker T.E. Augusty and P. Joseph dt. 5-12-1983 .

Ext. M2

But such a power could only be construed as an arbitrary power conferred with the management which has no legal sanction as is violative of principles of natural justice . The Hon'ble Apex Court has also approved deposits collectors of Bank as workmen u/ s 2 (s) of I.D. Act at least to a limited extent could be seen from the decision reported in 2001 LIJ ( SC) page 1045 in the case of Indian Bank Association and workmen of Syndicate Bank and others . The management has also no case that the bank had any control over the workman much less any evidence adduced in that line . so being a workman , the argument may not hold goods.

collection slip issued by the Management Bank. dt . 7-4-1997 .

-do- dt. 20-7-1997.

Ext. M2(1)

-do- dt. 27-4-1997 .

Ext. M2 (2)

-do- dt. 28-4-1997 .

Ext. M2 (3)

-do- dt. 7-4-1997 .

Ext. M2 (4)

-do- dt. 20-7-1997.

Ext. M2(5)

-do- dt. 20-7-1997 .

Ext. M2(6)

-do- dt. 24-7-1997.

Ext. M2 (7)

-do- dt. 20-1-1996.

Ext. M2 (8)

-do- dt. 20-1-1996 .

Ext. M2 (9)

-do- dt. 20-7-1997 .

Ext. M2 (10)

-do- dt. 15-4-1997 .

Ext. M2 ( 11)

-do- dt. 27-5-1997 .

Ext. M2 ( 12)

12. Once the action of the management is found illegal and capricious , normally the worker is entitled for reinstatement in service . But as observed in the decision discussed Supra persons who are engaged on the basis of individual contracts to work on commission basis cannot be equated with regular employees doing similar works . There is also no evidence to show that the workman was selected after undergoing any prescribed made or so holding any substantive post . The workman is also out of agency for a considerable long period . He has not led any satisfactory evidence regarding the quantum of commission received. Equally there is not evidence regarding the profitable altemate engagement or employment of the worker during the period . Having regard to all these , length of service , nature of employment , loss of future employment prospects and other relevant special circumstances , I hold that interest ofjustice could be adequately met by ordering payment of compensation in lieu of reinstatement .

Ext . M2 ( 13 ) ... collection slip issued by the Management Bank dt . 21-3-1997.

-de- dt. 8-2-1997 .

Ext. M2 (14)

-do- dt. 29-4-1997 .

Ext. M2 ( 15)

-do- dt. 20-5-1997 .

Ext. M2 (16)

-do- dt. 6-5-1997 .

Ext. M2 (17)

13. In the result, an award is passed setting aside the impugned action of the management in terminating the worker from service . The management is directed to pay Rs . 50,000/- as compensation to the worker within 30 days of pronouncementcement of award lest the amount will carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of pronouncement of award.

-do- dt. 21-3-1997 Ext: M2 ( 18)

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed be her, revised, corrected and passed by me on the 2nd day of November , 2005 .

Ext. M3

-do- dt. 29-6-1997.

-do- dt. 11-6-1997 .

Ext. M3 ( 1)

-do- dt. 21-6-1997 .

Ext. M3 (2)

K. BALASUBRAMANIAN , Presiding Officer APPENDIX

-do- dt. 30-5-1997 .

Ext. M3(3)

-do- dt. 20-5-1997, Ext. M3 (4)

Witnesses examined from the side of the Workman:- Nil

-do- dt. 17-5-1997 , Ext. M3 (5)

-do- dt. 23-6-1997 .

Ext. M3 (6)

Witnesses examined from the side of the Management: --

MW1 ... B. Krishnan Nair.

-do- dt. 20-5-1997 .

Ext. M3 (7)

-do- dt. 31-5-1997 .

Ext. M3 (8)

MW2 ... A. Gopalan.

-do- dt. 29-5-1997 .

Ext. M3 (9)

MW3 ... Ratnakaran.

698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

Ext. M3 (10) Collection slip

issued by the management

Bank

dt. 28-4 1997 .

-do- dt. 8-4-1997.

Ext. M3 ( 11 )

dt. 8-4-1997 .

-do-

Ext. M3 ( 12)

-do- dt. 8-4-1997 .

Ext. M3 (13)

-do- dt. 23-6-1997 .

Ext. M3 ( 14)

-do- dt. 25-4-1997 .

Ext. M3 ( 15)

Ext. M4 .. Letter sent by the Senior Manager of Canara Bank, Head Office Bangalore to the Dy . General Manager, Canara Bank Circle Office , Thiruvananthapuram dt. 18-8-97 .

Ext . M5 .. NNND Monthly Collection Register of Canara Bank Head Office , Bangalore from October 1995 to August 1997 .

Ext. M6 -do- from April 1997 to August 1997 .

Ext . M7 .. NNND collection slip Books issued Register of Canara Bank .

Ext. M8 .. Lr . issued to M.C. Ratnakaran , Officer , Canara Bank , Chalappuram by Senior Manager , Canara Bank, Regional Office Calicutwith copy to MI P& D section Circle Office TVM . DT . 19-9-97.

Ext. M9 .. Lr . sent by M.C. Ratnakaran , Officer of Canara Bank to Asst .

Ext. M9 ( a) Annexure to the Report submitted by M.C. Ratnakaran , Officer , Canara Bank , Chalappuramdt . 19-9-1997 of NNND agent T.E. Augusty .

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ.270 . - औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का. 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. भारत पैट्रोलियम कं. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 49/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-120040/67/95- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2005 S.O.270 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 49/ 2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Bharat Petroleum Co. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Govemmenton 23-12-2005 .

[No. L -120040/67/95 - IR( C - I) ]

S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT , JAIPUR CASE NO . CGIT - 49/2005.

Reference No. L - 120040/67/95-1R( C - 1 )

Sh . Rajulal Sharma,

Applicant S/ o Late Sh . R.B. Sharma , C/ o Sh . M.F. Baig , Advocate , Rasta Boraj Thakur Ka , Namak Ki Mandi , Kishanpol Bazar , Jaipur

Versus

1. The Senior Manager ,

M/ s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , 22Godam,

Non-applicant

Jaipur.

PRESENT :

Sh . R.C. Sharma Presiding Officer

: None .

For the applicant

For the non- applicant: Sh . Alok Fatehpuria Date of award

: 21-11-2005.

AWARD

I. The Central Government in exercise of the powers referred under Clause D of sub - section 1 to Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( for short, 'the Act' ) has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , which runs as under :-

Whether the action of the management of BPCL Jaipur in terminating the services of Sh . Rajulal Sharma, daily rated worker, w.e.f. 22-9-1993 is just , fair & legal ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

2. The workman in his claim statement has pleaded that he was employed as a 4th class on 4-3-1993 by the non -applicant , who was performing the duties similar to that of the 4th Class and continuously worked till 22-9-1993 , on which date his service was terminated in violation of Section 25-F of the Act . He has further averred that the non - applicant has also acted in contravention of Section 25 -G of the Act while terminating his service and subsequent to his termination the fresh hands have been recruited by him . He has urged that his termination order be declared illegal and [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

699

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

unjustified and he be reinstated in the service with all consequential benefits .

3. Resisting the claim, the non - applicant in his written- counter has averred that the workman was independently working as a book binder , who was assigned the binding works by the non - applicant management and the payment was made to him for carrying out his job . He has further stated that the workman was never an employee of the establishment , that it was a contract for service and not a contract of service, that the claimant is not a workman as defined under Section 2 -S of the Act and that he has also not completed even 240 days of work in the calendar year in the alleged duration from 4-3-1993 to 21-9-1993 , Hence , the present controversy is not attracted by Section 25 -F or Section 2 ( oo ) of the Act . It has been further stated that after his said termination on expiry of nearly 16 months , the claimant raised the dispute before the Conciliation Officer and when the Central Government declined to refer his dispute then after the lapse of more than two years in the year 1999 he filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court . It is alleged on behalf of the non - applicant that the workman has not approached this Court with clean hands .

4. In the rejoinder, the workman has disputed that he was an independent book binder and has pointed out that he was engaged as a 4th Class on daily wages basis.

5. On the pleadings of the parties , the following points for determination were framed :-

I. Whether the disputant was employed as a 4th Class on 4-3-1993 on daily wages basis , who continuously worked up to 21-9-1993 and his service was terminated on 22-9-1993 in violation of Section 25 -F of the Act ? BOA

II . Whether the non -applicant has violated the provision under Section 25 -G of the Act ? BOA

III . Whether after the terinination of the Workman , the fresh appointments were made in violation of Section 25-H of the Act ? BOA IV. Whether the claim being belated one is liable to be rejected ? BONA

V Relief , if any .

6. I have heard the Ld. representative for the non- applicant and have perused the record.

Points No. I, II & III

7. On 12-9-2005, the case was posted for 3-10-2005 and thereafter on 10-10-2005 for submission of the workman's evidence , but he sought the adjournments .

On 10-10-2005 , the case was fixed for 11-11-2005 for workman's evidence, but on this date he did not put his appearance before the Court . The case was thereafter posted on 21-11-2005 for order . It was the responsibility of the workman to prove his claim by adducing the cogent evidence on the record . But despite the ample opportunities being granted to him, he has failed to bring any evidence on the record and has not even submitted his affidavit in support of his claim . Therefore, the workman has failed to prove his claim . Thus, it is a case of no evidence and all these points are decided against theworkman.

Point No. IV

8. It has been contended on behalf of the non- applicant that the workman has raised this industrial dispute belatedly and no explanation thereof could be offered on his behalf. But admittedly, when the Central Government declined to refer the dispute to the Tribunal , the workman has preferred the writ petition before the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court and by the order of the Court , the present reference has been made by the Central Government to this CGIT. Therefore , on this admitted factual position , the delay caused in referring the dispute cannot be deemed to be fatal to the workman's case . Accordingly , this point is decided against the non -applicant .

9. Resultantly , the reference is answered in the negative against the workman and in favour of the Corporation and it is held that the termination order dated 22-9-1993 passed by the non - applicant management against the workman is just , fair and legal . The claim of the workman is dismissed . An award is passed in these terms accordingly .

10. Let a copy of the award may be sent to the Central Govemment for publication under Section 17 ( 1 ) of the Act.

R.C. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 271. - औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल वेअरहाऊसिंग कार्यों. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में, केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली न. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 28/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42011/2/2001- आई आर ( विविध ) ] बी. एम . डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 26th December , 2005

S.O. 271 . Inpursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central 700

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

Corporation without even giving notice under Section 9-A of the ID Act to the workmen . The respondent Corporation did not agree to restore the said facility despite repeated requests of the applicant union and despite conciliatory proceedings carried in the office of Conciliation Officer .

Government hereby publishes the award Ref. 28/2001 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, New Delhi No. II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Warehousing Corporation Ltd. , and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 26-12-2005.

[No. L-4201 1/2/2001 - IR (M) ]

B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

The service conditions of the workmen are settled through agreements/ memorandum of understandings signed between the workmen's unions and the respondent Corporation .

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R.N. RAI . I.D. NO . 28/2001

In the Matter of :-

The General Secretary, Federation of Central Warehousing Corporation Employees Union , WZ -677 , Shiv Ng . Jail Road, New Delhi .

VERSUS

That various agreements/memorandum of understandings were signed between the workmen's unions and the respondent management over the charter ofdemands ofthe workmen in the past decades. But the facility of 12 days casual leave in a year was neither demanded to be increased/ reduced nor the same was ever agreed to be so between the respondent Corporation and the Workers ' Unions/ Federation in any of the agreement/ memorandum of understandings signed between them in the past. Therefore , the facility of 12 days casual leave in a year had become part of the service conditions of the workmen of the respondent Corporation.

The Managing Director,

Central Warehousing Corporation Limited, 4/1 , Siri Institutional Area, Khel. Gaon Marg , New Delhi 16 .

AWARD

In the memorandum of understanding signed between the respondent Corporation and different unions / federations of the workmen on 09-09-1996 it was agreed in its para 8.3 that " Existing benefits and facilities not altered by this MOU shall continue as hitherto . " This MOU was later agreed to be treated as memorandum of settlement ( MOS ) vide agreement dated 12-12-1996 signed between the parties .

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 42011 / 2/2001 IR ( M) Central Governmentdt . 27-03-2001 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :-

It is submitted that the facility of 12 days casual leave in a year which was not altered in the above noted memorandum of understanding and agreement (MOS) had to continue as before as per its para 8.3 which is reproduced above .

"Whether the action of the management of Central Warehousing Corporation Limited in reducing number of Casual Leave of Workmen from 12 to 8 days in a year vide their Circular No. 1/99 dated 05-01-1999 implemented from same date , prior to publication of Notification dated 19-04-1999 which was to be implemented from the date of its publication in official gazette i.e. 19-04-1999 and without giving any notice of change under Section 9-A to the workman is justified , valid and reasonable ? If not to what relief the workmen are entitled to and from what date .

That the respondent management arbitrarily , illegally and in violation of the above noted para 8.3 of the memorandum of understanding/MOS reduced the number of casual leave from 12 to 8 days in a year and that too without serving any notice under Section 9 -A of the I.D. Act to the workmen , Worker's Union etc. before doing the same . The respondent Corporation issued its Circular No. 1/99 on 05-01-1999 to reduce the said Casual Leave of the workmen illegally.

That the applicant Federation of Unions protested against the above noted illegal action of reducing workmen's casual leaves from 12 to 8 days in a year in its letter dated 06-01-1999 sent to the respondent management and requested to it not to reduce the workmen's casual leave from 12 to 8 days in a year . A photocopy of this letter is annexed as Annexure - l to this The workmen applicants have filed statement of claim. In their statement of claim they have stated that the workmen of the respondent Corporation had been enjoying the facility of 12 days casual leave in a year . This facility was in existence right from the inception of the respondent Corporation . This facility has arbitrarily and unlawfully been reduced from 12 days casual leave to 8 days casual leave in year by the respondent [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

claim.

That a meeting was held between the representatives of the respondent management and the Applicant Federation on the above and other issues on 16-02-1999 , wherein the management proposed to keep this matter before its Board of Director for consideration and necessary action . The management thereafter also wrote its letter dated 25-02-1999 to the Applicant Federation in this regard , a photocopy of which is annexed to its claim as Annexure - II .

That when the respondent Corporation did not withdraw its said arbitrary action of reducing the Casual Leave from 12 to 8 in a year for months together even after its Annexure - II letter, the applicant Federation sent its lawyer notice dated 19-07-1999 to the respondent Corporation against the same and its other wrongs . A copy of the lawyer notice is annexed as Annexure - III to this statement of claim .

That the applicant Federation's respresentatives met the Managing Director of the respondent Corporation on 06-10-1999 and brought to his kind notice that a number of grievances and demands of the workers were pending for action with the respondent management . He asked the Applicant Federation to make list of the said grievances and demands and to submit the same to him for his fixing a formal meeting with the Federation to discuss and sort out the same. Accordingly the Applicant Federation submitted the list of the grievances and demadns to him vide its letter dated 15- 10-1999 and listed the demand for restroation of 12 days causal leave and in the same . A copy of the Applicant Federation's letter dated 15-10-1999 is annexed as Annexure - IV to this claim .

That the respondent management held meeting with the Applicant Federation on 3/4 . 11. 999 and communicated to the applicant vide their letter dated 05-11-1999 about their stand which they had taken on different grievances and demands of the workmen in that meeting.

It is respectfully submitted that leaving apart other facts , even the staff regulations of the respondent Corproation which govem the leaves of the workmen also . specifically provide for 12 days casual leave in a year to the workers . It is pointed out that while clause 31 of these regulation states that leaves ( other than casual leave) shall be govemed by the Central Civil Services (Leave ) Rules , 1972 , Clause 32 of the same governs the casual leaves of the workers , which is not covered under the said Central Civil Services (Leave ) Rules . As far as Clause 32 of the Staff Regulations is concerned , it is specificially stated therein that the workers shall be eligible for 12 days causal leave in a year. Both clauses 31 and 32 of the Staff Regulations are reproduced below

701

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

to clarify the matter further .

Clause 31 : Leave-Every employee shall be governed in the matter of leave by the provisions contained in the Central Civil Services (Leave ) Rules , 1972 as amended from time to time . "

Clause 32 : ( i ) An employee shall be eligible for casual leave to the extent of twelve days on full pay in a year .

In view of the above submissions and the facts submitted in the annexed letters/ representations etc. of the Applicant Federation , it is crystal clear that the act of the respondent corporation/ management reducing casual leaves of the workmenfrom 12 to 8 days in a year is wholly arbitrary , wrong , unlawful and is liable to be set aside more particularly when the management has done it without even giving notice under Section 9 - A of the ID Act to the workmen.

The management has filed written statement. In the written statement it is submitted that the service conditions are governed by the provisions of CWC (staff) Regulations, 1986 framed in terms of provisions of Warehousing Corporation Act, 1962. The Corporation is Central Government Undertaking and hence the ultimate controlvests with the Central Government . The Regulations , 1986 is therefore statutory Regulation . The leave is regulated by Regulation 31 & 32. The Corporation has adopted CCS (Leave) Rules , 1972 in terms of Regulation 31. Therefore , the charter of the employment of the employees of the Corporation has become a status' and does not remains as simple contract of employment . Hence the statutory service conditions can be altered/ modified unilaterally . The reduction of casual leave from 12 days to 8 days was in furtherance of the Directive dated 19-01-1998 of the Central Govemment . The management has accordingly reduced the Casual Leave from 12 to 8 days vide its Circular dated 5-01-1999 . Hence there is no violation of Section 9 -A of the ID Act , as alleged. In any event the CWC Staff Regulation, 1986 being statutory and the Regulation relating to Casual Leave can be unilaterally changed and Section 9 - A of ID Act would not be attracted . The allegation of arbitrary and unlawful alteration of service conditions are therefore wholly wrong and denied . The demand of the Union being unjustified and unreasonable the management could not agree to restore the CL to 12 days in the conciliation proceedings . The position of the management was made clear before the Conciliation Officer by submitting its reply.

It ishowever wrong to say that by Memorandum of Understanding the service conditions are settled . In any event these allegations are extraneous to the scope of the terms of Reference order. As regards , the leave Rules , particularly Casual Leave is Regulated by 702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)]

beneficial one . Hence there could be no grievance and prejudice to the employees of the Corporation .

It is stated that a meeting was held on 3/4-11-1999 in the matter of Casual Leave with the Federation and it was resolved to seek expert legal opinion . The Board of Directors had considered the issue and confirmed the decision of reduction of CL and enhancement of other leave facilities .

It ishowever correct that the Corporation received notice dated 19-07-1999 from the Advocate of the Union . The contents of the notice were unreasonable and unjustified. There was nothing arbitrary in reducing CL from 12 to 8 days . That the contents of para 10 of the claim are wrong and denied . The grievances and demands of the Union were unreasonable and unjustified and hence could not be acceded to . It is pertinent to mention here that no Federation/union except the claimant Federation ever raised any dispute over the issue of CL .

Regulation 31 & 32 of Staff Regulation 1986 and CCS (Leave) Rules , 1972. That the contents of para 3 of the claim as stated are wrong and denied being misconceived. The service condition is statutory in nature and hence it can be unilterally changed. Hence Section 9 - A of ID is not attracted . The 12 days casual leave was reduced to 8 days by effecting necessary changes/amendments in the Regulation 1986 in furtherance to diectives of the Government of India . The Corporation otherwise bound to obey the directives / instructions of dhe Government of India . It is submitted that MOU dated 09-09-1996 has no relevance to the issue in dispute . The CL is governed by CCS ( Leave ) Rules , 1972. the alleged memorandum of settlement dated 12-12-1996 has also no relavance to the issue . The alleged MOS and MOU have no relevance and are extraneous to the issue in dispute . Statutory service conditions can be unilaterally changed . Statutory services conditions converts the character of employment to status ; having acquired the status , the employees can not rely on the pure contract of employment. Statutes comes into operation on its own and hence consent of employees is not required . As a consequences , there is no violation of Section 9 -A of ID Act, 1947. The statutory provisions i.e. CWC Staff Regulations , 1986 and Warehousing Corporation Act , 1962 shall over ride the provisionsofID Act, 1947 , being a special enactment . The management corporation reduced the casual leave to 8 days as per the directive of the Central Government , which was based on the recommendations of the Vth pay Commission . There is no violation of Para 8.3 of the alleged MOU/MOS . Since section 9 -A was not attracted , there was no need to give any notice under Section 9 - A . It is correct that the management issued Circular dated 5-01-1999 reducing the CL to 8 days . The reduction of CL to 8 days is applicable to all categories ofemployees .

It is however submitted that a notice dated 19-07-1999 was received from the Advocate of the Union which has no relevance to the matter . It is submitted that reduction of casual leave to 8 days is fully justified and there was nothing illegal in reducing the leave . On the basis of the Vth Pay Commission . The Government of India issued directive to reduce CL from 12 to 8 days . The Corporation not only reduced CL from 12 to 8 days ; butincreased the encashment of earned leave limit from 240 to 300 days; increased the Maternity leave from 60 to 135 days ; 15 days Paternity Leave too was given . Therefore , it being a package having both reduction , enhancement and introduction of leave benefits, is fully justified and reasonable and no prejudice would be caused to the employees . The Union cannot be permitted to raise the issue of reduction of CL while enjoying enhancement of leave benefits . There couldbe no pick and choose . In fact the entire package in toto is a

The effect of Regulation 31 and 32 is quesiton of interpretation and can be explained at the time of argument . It is submitted that the management submitted its proposed amendment tobe effected in aforesaid Regulation to Ministry of CAF and PD which returned the amended draft duly vetted by the Ministry of Law vide its letter dated 8-02-1999. In accordance with law, the amendment to regulation 32 of the said Regulation was published in the Government Gazette Notification dated 19-04-1999 . Since the orders of the Government regarding reduction of CL was to be implemented from the commencement of the calendar year 1999 hence Circular No. 1/99 dated 5-01-1999 was issued , as the matter of Gazette Notification of amendment was already under process . The notification dated 19-04-1999 effecting the amendment in Regulation 32 of CWC ( staff) Regulation 1986 is legal and valid . the nucleus of the dispute is reduction of CL from 12 to 8 days . Though the term of reference refers to Circular No. 1/99 dated 5-01-1999 , the incidental aspect of the dispute i.e. notification dtd . 19-04-1999 issued in accordance with law , should also be considered by this Hon'ble Tribunal. The very object of the ID Act , 1947 is to maintain industrial harmony and find solution/resolution of dispute in furtherance of the object of the Act . Therefore , without prejudice to the above submission it is submitted that the term of reference in fact is a result of non- application of mind by the appropriate Government . Because the reference has been restricted to the Circular No. 1/99 dated 5-01-1999 though the real dispute being reduction of CL from 12 to 8 days . The action of reduction of CL to 12 days is single incidence/ act commenced with the Circular dated 5-01-1999 and culminated on 19-04-1999 i.e. with the notificaiton . Hence the entire action with regard to the reduction of CL, if seen the action of the management is justified , legal and 703 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

Corporation.

valid . Rest of the allegations are wrong and denied . As regards the reprsentation, if any that matters of records . It is further reiterated that the action of the management in reducing the CL from 12 to 8 days is fully justified, legal and valid. There was no violation of Section 9 -A of the ID Act .

Rejoinder has been filed on behalf of the union by the General Secretary . The averments of the claim have been reiterated in the rejoinder and it has been stated that casual leave has illegally been reduced from 12 to 8 days . Most of the paras of the written statement have been denied. The respondents have also denied most of the paras of the claim statement.

It was further submitted that a bid to implement theVth Pay Commission report the Board of Directors reduced the casual leave from 12 to 8 but the encashment of earned leave limit is increased from 240 to 300 days . Maternity leave is increased from 61 to 136 days , 15 days paternity leave has also been granted to the workinen. In view of all these added benefits casual leave as per the recommendations of the Vth Pay Commission was reduced from 12 to 8 so no prejudice has been caused to the workmen . The Board of Directors have done so as a matter of policy decision and the employees have availed of all the benefits granted to them under the Vth Pay Commission recommendations .

It transpires from perusal of the order sheet that the General Secretary was not available for cross examination so his cross examination was closed . However , he again appeared on 3-10-2005 and the order of closure of the cross examination was set aside still he did not appear on the next date and the cost imposed has not been paid. He did not appear even on 22-11-2005. Argument from the side of the management was heard.

It was submitted that once the workmen have opted for the benefits accorded to them by the implementation of the Vth Pay Commission they cannot again raise the matter for increasing casual leave from 8 to 12 days . All the workmen are getting HRA increased , encashment and other benefits . They cannot do both approbate and reprobate . If they have accepted the beneficial measures they are estopped from raising the matter of reduction of the casual leave .

The case of the workman is that casual leave was reducedfrom 12 days to 8 days and this action is arbitrary and blind. Notice under Section 9 of the ID Act has not been given prior to change of service condition . Admittedly notice has not been given . It was submitted from the side of the respondents that in order to implement the recommendations of the Vth Pay Commission the Board of Directors reduced casual leave from 12 to 8 as per recommendations of the Vth Pay Commission . However, the workmen have been paid HRA , CCA and several other benefits have been given to the workmen as recommended by the Vth Pay Commission .

From perusal of the changed rules it appears that many bencfits have been poured upon the workmen and they have accepted it so the changed conditions have been approved by the workmen themselves and so they cannot be permitted to raise any dispute regarding the same as they cannot approve the portion of the agreement which is beneficial to then and disapproved the portion which is not beneficial to them . They have either to reject the benefits or to accept the entire modified of the amenities provided to them which they have been availing of according to the recoinmendations of Vth Pay Commission . Casual Leave has been reduced to 8 but encashment leave has been increased , matemity and paternity leave has been increased and HRA has been given 30 % and they are availing themselves of all these benefits so they cannot impugned the amended provision regarding casual leave . Since leave is governed by the CCS Rules, 1972 it cannot be amended in the light of the recommendations of Vth Pay Commission . Notice of Seciton 9A of the ID Act is not applicable where leave rules are govemed by CCS Rules, 1972. There is no inerit in the claim statement .

The reference is replied thus ;-

The substantial quesiton is whether the Board of Directors can reduce casual leave from 12 days to 8 days or not . It was submitted from the side of the management that casual leave is governed by CCA (CCS) Rules . Accordingto Section 9 A of the ID Act, 1947 if the employer wants to make any change in the conditions of service then he has to give the prescribed notice of 21 days under Section 9 A ( a & b ) of the said Act . The service conditions are governed by Civil Services Rules and in these rules there is no provision for giving any notice by the employer to the workmen . It was further submitted that by virtue of regulation 31 the Corporation has opted CCS (Leave rules ) , 1972 as amended from time to time. So casual leave and other leave of the workmen are governed by the CCS Rules . The Board of Directors has amended the service rules . It was subrnitted that the service rules are special rules and they have the force of Statute and a special statute over rides the general statute so Section 9A of the ID Act , 1947 is not attracted. The applicability of CCS Rules is expressely continued in the regulation 31 of the

The action of the management of Central Warehousing Corporation Limited in reducing number of Casual Leave of workmen from 12 to 8 days in a year vide their Circular No. 1/99 dated 5-01-1999 implemented from the same date , prior to publication of notification dated 19-04-1999 which was to be implemented from the date of its publication in Official Gazette i.e. 19-04-1999 and without giving any notice of change under Section 9A to the workmen is justified, valid and reasonable . The workmen applicants are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

Award is given accordingly .

Dated: 9-12-2005.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer 704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 26 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 272.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार हरियाणा मिनरल्स लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली नं. 2 के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 37/2005 को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं एल-29012/6/2005 - आई आर ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 26th December , 2005.

S.O. 272. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 37/2005 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, New Delhi No. II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Haryana Minerals Ltd. , Phase - 5 , Udyog Vihar and their workman , received by the Central Government on 26-12-2005 .

[No. L -29012/6/2005 - IR (M) ]

B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- II NEW DELHI

PRESENT:

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 37/2005

In the Matter of :-

Shri Balbir Singh ,

H. No. 272 , Vill : Asola, P. O.: Fatehpur Beri , Church Gali , New Delhi.

Versus

The Managing Director , Haryana Minerals Limited , Phase- 5 , Udyog Vihar, HSIDC Complex , Gurgaon , Haryana .

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 29012/6 / 2005 - IR ( M) Central Government dt . 27-04-2005 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :--

"Whether the action of the management of Haryana Minerals Limited in terminating the services of Shri

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Balbir Singh , Mining Mate , without paying legal dues simultaneously w.e.f. 03-03-2003 is legal and just ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ? " It transpires from perusal of the order sheet that the workman was not present on 06-12-2005 . Notice to the workman was sent directing him to file claim statement but the workman applicant has not tumed up . The management hasbeen present all along . The workman applicant has not filed claim statement despite service ofnotice .

No dispute award is given . Date: 09-12-2005 .

R. N. RAI , PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 26 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 273.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट अथोरिटी ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुंबई न. 2 के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 47/2003 को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार की 26-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं एल -11012/10/2003 - आई आर ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 26th December , 2005 S.O. 273. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 47/2003 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Mumbai No. II as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Airports Authority of India, Santa Cruz Airport , and their workman , receivedby the Central Government on 26-12-2005 .

[No. L- 11012/ 10/2003 - IR ( M ) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2 ATMUMBAI

PRESENT :

B. I. Kazi , Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT- 2/47 of 2003 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA

AND THEIR WORKMEN

(Mrs. Yamunabai Vetal )

APPEARANCES :

Shri A. S. Patil Advocate Forthe Employer :

For the Workman : Mr. M. B. Anchan Advocate Mumbai , Dated: 8th November , 2005 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi , by its Order No. L- 11012/ 10/2003 IR (M) dated 28-08-2003 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :---

SCHEDULE

" Whether the action of Airport Authority of India , Mumbai in terminating the services of Mrs. Yamunabai Vetal , Ex- Safaiwala isjustified and legal? Ifnot , what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? " 2.Onreceipt ofOrder of Reference from Government, noticeswere issued to Management and Workman ( Ex. 2) . Advocates for both parties remained present on the date ofhearing and filed their respective Vaklatnama . Thereafter the matter was adjourned for filing Statement of Claim at the request of Workman . Since then the matter was adjourned on various dates for filing Statement of Claim . However , the Workman failed to file Statement of Claim . Once again notice was issued to the Workman ( Ex . 7) . Notice to Workman returened unserved ( Ex . 9) . Again notice was issued to Workman to appear on 8-11-2005 (Ex . 10). The said notice was returned with postal remarks " Left " (Ex . 12) . Advocate for Workman Mr. M. B. Anchan present today and states that he is not aware of the whereabouts of the Workman .

3. In the circumstances the Reference needs to be disposed of for default . Hence the order .

ORDER

Reference stands disposed of for default .

B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 274.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ई. एस. आई . अस्पताल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली न. 2 के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 51/99 को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-15012/2/98- आई आर ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 26th December , 2005 S.O. 274.-- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 51/1999 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, New Delhi No. II as shown in the Annexure in the

705

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

Industrial Dispute between the management of E. S. I. Hospital and their workman , received by the Central Government on 26-12-2005.

[No. L- 150 12/2/98 - IR(M) ]

B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II NEW DELHI

PRESENT :

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 51/1999

In the Matter of:-

Smt. Raj Rani ,

C/o Samajwadi Karamchari Union , 35, Govind Khand , Vishwakarma Nagar , New Delhi . - 110095 .

Versus

E.S.I. Hospital ,

TheDy. Director (Admn . ) Basaidarapur , Ring Road , New Delhi - 110095 .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 15012/ 2/98- IR (M) Central Governmentdt. 27-01-2000 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of E.S.I.C. in terminating the services of Smt. Raj Rani isjustified ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled ? " The workman has filed claim statement. The claim statement it has been stated that the management had advertised vacancies of Lower Division Clerks and their requirement was that the candidate should be matriculate or equivalents having knowledge and experience of handling of Computer , in the age group 18-25 years . The requisition was also addressed by the management to the Sub- Regional Employment Exchange , Darya Ganj New Delhi vide letterdt . 23-10-1989 . The workman had passed (10+ 2) i.e. Senior Secondary School Certificate Examination from Central Board of Secondary Education in 1983. Her name wassponsoredby the Employment Exchange, New Delhi . Being a scheduled caste candidate she was considered by the management in that category and was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk in the pay scale of Rs . 950-20-1150- EB- 25-1500 vide Office Order No. 622 dt . 9-10-90 .

That the workman had been in the employment of the management as a Lower Division Clerk- L.D.C . since 8-10-90 continuously. The last drawn total monthly wages 706

[ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

ofthe workman were Rs . 4702. During the long period of employment the workman worked in various departments doing the job of Clerk/ Steno - Typist/ Computer - Operator and had a clean and blotless record of service and never gave any chance of complaint to the management .

That during the period of workman's employment withthe management, on 4-1-1993 the management again sent requisition to the Sub - Regional Employment Exchange , Darya Ganj , New Delhi for recruitment to the postof L.D.C. again on purely temporary and ad -hoc basis . It is submitted that such requisitions of the management weremalafide, un -genuine , vindictive , unfair labour practice, unjust and unwarranted, as there always existed continuous work of permanent nature with management since the number of industries and employees covered under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 was increasing day by day . Appointments in the name of temporary and ad- hoc basis , again and again by the management have been a mal -practice just to get rid of some employees and to accommodate persons of the choice of management's senior officers .

That the management had been adopting mal- practices and unfair labour practices by appointing the workman on so called ad - hoc and purely temporary basis , whereas there always existed permanent vacancies . Though appointed on adhoc /temporary basis , the workman was required to do all jobs and works of permanent nature continuously for the entire period of her service . During thisperiod , the workman was also granted increments and was shifted/transferred from one seat/job /department/ office to the other. Though the workman worked continuously for such a long period of about five years , she was not regularized, keeping the sword on her neck in the name of calling her ad- hoc temporary.

That though the workman was nicely, accurately , properly , correctly and effectively performing all the jobs to the entire satisfaction of her superiors in the management still she was subjected to various typing and other tests just to create vacancies and employment opportunities for others by delibreately under assessing the workman with a viewto eliminate her on some pretext or the other .

That having taken continuous work of permanent nature from the workman for about five years and even finding her qualified in latest quarterly typing test of 1995 , the workman was all of a sudden terminated from service bythe management in the garb ofretrenchment vide Memo Number 11 /C/ 18/3/91 /Admn . dt . 31-5-95 issued by Sh . A. K. Mishra , Deputy Regional Director, ESIC grossly violating the essential requirement of retrechment i . e . " last come, first go " . It is submitted that Mr. A. K. Mishra has been a staunch Brahmin who hated scheduled castes and wanted to get rid of all scheduled castes from his office on one pretext or the other . Such action of the Deputy Regional Director ofthe management was against the Fundamental Rights of the workman , as guaranteed to her by the Constitution of India .

That the management being a body corporate under a stature , under the control of Ministry of Labour was supposed to maintain records of all vacancies , employment and services of all its employees whether appointed on adhoc / temporary basis or on permanent basis . However , the management did not maintain proper records and manipulated the same as per its convenience and whims so as to eliminate some employees and to accommodate others ofmanagement's choice . No seniority list was ever prepared or accomodate others of management's choice . No seniority list was ever prepared or maintained by the management . There was no break in service of the workman and she was a member of Provident Fund also . She was medically fit all over the period .

That in 1994 the workman was required to appear in Hindi/English quarterly typing test to be held on 6-1-1995 and her roll number was 14016 as issued by Shri Amod Kumar Mishra , Deputy Regional Director of the management . On 7-2-1995 the workman was declared having passed the examination by the management .

That the workman bad been a diploma holder in computers and was selected for the post of LDC on the basis of her qualification and successfully worked in Computer Cell of the management at its Regional Office , New Delhi . As such there was no necessity for again asking the workman to appear in any typing/ computer test . Such test could have been justified only in case of departmental promotion and not for the same post on which the workman had been successfully doing the job such as of LDC . It is pertinent to mention here that during the entire tenure of her service for about five years the workman was never given any advisory letter , memo , warning , charge sheet or any other communication in writing pointing out any deficiency in her work either as Clerk or typist or computer operator or otherwise . It was because of the fact the she was performing all the jobs assigned to her perfectly , corrrectly and satisfactorily . In such circumstances there was no necessity at all to subject her to any further typings or computer qualification test . Such tests in the garb of recruitment through SSC or regularization were simply ridiculous , meaningless for regularization of service ,. The workman who had continuously worked for the management for about five years without any complaint in her work and conduct and without any break in service That though the initial appointment of the workman vide Office Order No. 622/1990 was on so called ad - hoc basis as a stop gap arrangement which was not expected to last for more than three months , still the workman was continuously kept in service of the management till 31-5-1995 when she was illegally terminated in the garb of retrenchment without compliance of provisions of " retrenchment" as per the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 . Calling it a stop gap arrangement had in fact no basis at all andwas simply a farce and manipulation.

707 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

was deemed to have been regularized in service of management and also enjoing her senority in comparison to those LDC who were subsequently employed by the management in 1994-95 batches .

Thatthe workman sent demand notice dt. 21-3-97 by Regd . Post to the management demanding her reinstatement with continuity of services and back wages . The said demand notice was duly received by the managmenet but therewas no response to the demand notice duly received by the management .

Thateven during conciliation proceedings the Asstt . Labour Commissioner ( C) Delhi - l suggested to the management to consider the absorption of the workman against the vacant post of L.D.C. in the establishment on the basis of her experience of 5 years service but the management refused to take any suggestion . The conciliation proceedings failed due to adamant stand of the management . Hence the reference to the Hon'ble Court .

That in the facts and circumstances detailed above, the workman is entitled to reinstatement in service with continuity of service and full back wages and consequential benefits since the date of her illegal termination/ retrenchment .

That Ms. Mini Thomas , Ms. Babita and Sh . Kamal Pervez all LDC were junior to the workman and were retained in service by the management while terminating the services of the workman in the garb of retrenchment . The action of the management was in violation of Section 25 G of 1.D. Act as no distinction could be drawn between the LDC recruited in the year 1989-90 and 1994-95 . The category of the workman was LDC only and as such while effecting retrenchment from the category of LDC the person who joined last as LDC was supposed to go first and this rule of " last come - first go " was not followed by the management . The management is not justified in saying thatthe batch of 1994-95 was a better qualified batch than the persons recruited in 1989-90 as all of them made to work in the office interchangeably including working on computers . It is submitted that the workman was equally qualified in computer and had longer experience of computer -operation , as compared to Ms. Mini Thomas , Ms. Babita and Mr. Kamal Pervez .

The management has filed written statement. In the written statement it has been stated that the issue relating to termination of services of LDCs recruited on adhoc basis has been a subject matter of extensive litigation in Central Administrative Tribunal as also in the Supereme Court . The issue was settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ESOC Vs. Trilok Chand and others by Judgement order dated 10-12-1992 (copy enclosed as ANNEXURE- R-1)

B. Pursuant to the above mentioned ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court , the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed the following two cases :-

ESIC

Vs.

(i) Ms. Shobha Rani & others

(Copy oforder 17-09-1993 is enclosed as ANNEXURE R-II)

( ii ) Miss Surjeet Kaur and others Vs. ESIC That the management of the corporation while effecting retrenchment of the workman has not followed the mandatory conditions of Section 25 - F , 25 -G and 25 - H ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 as they did not maintain any list of seniority nor effected the retrenchment as per the law and Rules of retrenchment . The management has retained in service , workman junior to her and also recruited fresh working hands after her retrenchment , without affording an opportunity to the workman for joining the services of the corporation . Thus , the aforesaid three Sections of 1.D. Act and connected rules there under were grossly violated by the management . The management is not justified in making any excuse such as the workman wasappointed as LDC, with knowledge of typing only or that her recruitment was made on ad -hoc basis .

(Copy of order dated dated 30-03-1995 is enclosed as ANNEXURE R - III )

The Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed yet another identical case ofMajula Bhardwaj Vs ESIC by order dated03-01-2000-copy enclosed as ANNEXURE R.IV. That it was highly improper , unreasonable and inequitable on the part of the management to have retrenched the workman with such a long satisfactory service just to pave the way for new recruits in the garb of recruitment rules or sanction of posts etc.

That the action of the management in terminating the service of the workman is illegal, invalid, unjustified and highly improper . The workman appointed in 1990 has beenthrown on the roads making her handicapped to secure any other suitable job/govt . service as at the time of her termination she had crossed the age limit required in govt . service.

Theworkman was recruited through oral interview held on 27-2-1990 and 28-2-1990 along with 19 other candidates on ad- hoc basis as a stop gap arrangement pending recruitment through the Competitive Written Examination which is the prescribed method of recruitment inthe Statutory Recruitment Regulation . A list of candidates so selected on ad - hoc basis indicating the present status ofeach such candidate is enclosed as ANNEXURE R - V .

The workman was given a chance to appear in the written examination held on 26-12-1993 especially for ad - hoc LDC's . The workman failed in the said examination .

That since the date of termination of her service the workman is continuously unemployed and unable to secure any job despite best efforts on her part and also because ofher age-bar.

708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA I , 1927

[ PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] The services of the workman were terminated on 31-5-1995 by following the principled of ' last come first go' and in full compliance with the provision Section 25 - F of the I.D. Act . The workman accepted the payment of Rs. 8480 on 1-11-1995 .

Ms. Mini Thomas , Ms. Babita and Shri Kamal Pervez all LDCs junior to the workman were retained in service by the management and the services of the workman were terminated in a garb of retrenchment . The action of the management is quite discriminatory , arbitary and illegal . The principles of retrenchment have not been followed .

It is abundantly clear from the list enclosed as Annexure R- V that persons both junior and senior to the workman have sought similar relief but their applications have been dismissed . Manjula's names appear at S. No. 5 and her application was dismissed by CAT ( Annexure R- IV).

Shobha Rani's name submission made above , it is evident that the workman has no case at all . The claim deserves to be rejected and is prayed accordingly.

It was submitted from the side of the management that she was appointed on adhoc basis and when candidates were selected on the basis of regular selection she was retrenched . She has been paid retrenchment compensation and pay in lieu of notice . Her appointment was purely on adhoc basis as stop gap arrangement . Recruitment through the competitive written examination according to the statutory recruitment was pending, when appointments were made according to the recruitment rules her services were no longer required and her services were termminated by giving her retrenchment compensation .

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that along with the workman other adhoc LDCs were appointed . An interview was conducted on 27-02-1990 and 28-02-1990 and the successful candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange were given appointment for the post of LDC on purely temporary and adhoc basis.

The true facts relating to appointment and termination are given in the preliminary submissions . The workman was junior most LDC and all all her juniors have already been terminated by the replacement of qualified candidates sponsored by the Staff Selection Commission. The workman was terminated according to the judgment given by the CAT Delhi by strictly observing the principle 'first come last go ' . The services of the workman have been terminated after giving one month's notice in her termination order itself, for the payment of compensation in lieu ofone month notice and average pay as retrenchment benefit for the service rendered by the applicaant in the corporation in accordance with Section 25 - F of Industrial Act 1947. The workman since accepted the amount of Rs. 8480 on 01-11-1995 .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In her rejoinder she has reiterated the averments of her claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras ofthe claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

Annexure R - 5 proves the fact that the workman was appointed on purely temporary and adhoc basis only on the basis of interview . No written test was taken whereas written test is essential in view of the recruitment rules . It wasfurther submitted by the respondents that the workman hasadmitted in her cross - examination that no written test was taken at the time of employment . She has further admitted that she had appeared in the staff selection test for recruitment of LDC but she could not succeed in that test . Her admission during the cross - examination establishes the fact that she was offered an opportunity for appearing in the staff selection test and she did appear but she could not succeed. This indicates the fact that the appointment of the workinan applicant was purely on adhoc and temporary basis till the preparation of the list by staff selection test as per the statutory recruitment rules .

It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that she worked almost for five years under the management . Though she was selected on adhoc basis yet the vacancy was permanent and of regular nature . She was given increment during her employment . She should not have been appointed on adhoc and purely temporary basis as there always existed permanent vacancies . She perforsmed the duty very sincerely and efficiently . The management was biased to remove her from services as she belongs to schedule caste community . So she was retrenched whereas the services of juniors to her have been regularized . She was not appointed on stop gap arrangement . This plea is simply false and manipulated. The respondents should have followed the principle of last come first go policy while retrenching her as per expressed provisions of the ID Act .

It was further submitted that she has been appointed only for the period till the staff selection test is taken for recruitment of LDC according to the recruitment rules . It has been specifically mentioned in her appointment letter that she was being appointed on purely adhoc and temporary basis . It is settled law that an adhoc employee could not be regularized . Adhoc appointments are made for a particular purpose and for specific period so that in the meantime selection through regular process may be made. She has not been appointed according to the recruitment process . My attention was drawn to Civil Appeal No. 5302 and 5305 of 1992. The Hon'ble Supreme Courthas held that the LDCs appointed on casual or adhoc basison express condition mentioned at the time of making their appointment cannot be regularized since the process [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]

ofselection could not be completed for some time . Regular selection has been held in accordance with the prescribed rules . It has been held in a catena of cases by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that an adhoc employee cannot be regularized when the appointment is purely adhoc and temporary . The candidates are selected by regular process . The workman is an adhoc appointee as has been admitted by her and she did not succeed in the regular test held by the staff selection committee so she could not be regularized .

No discrimination has been made and no senior or junior to the workman applicant has been regularized withoutpassing the staff selection test . So the management has observed the principles of last come first go . There is no merit in the claim statement of the workman applicant. She is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The reference is replied thus :-

The action ofthe management of ESIC in terminating the services of Smt . Raj Rani isjustified . She is not entitled to get any releif as prayed for.

Award is givenaccordingly .

Date 7-12-2005

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 275.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट आथोरिटी ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारोंके बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुंबई नं. 2 के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 42/2003 को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-11012/11/2003- आई आर ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2005 S.O. 275. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 42/2003 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Airports Authority of India, Santa Cruz Airport, and their workman , received by the Central Government on 27-12-2005 .

[No. L- 11012/ 11 /2003 - IR (M) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL NO. 2 AT MUMBAI 55 GFILE- 29

709

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

PRESENT:

PrisidingOfficer: B. I. Kazi

REFERENCE NO. CGIT- 2/42 of 2003 Employers in Relation to the Management of Airports Authority of India

AND

Their Workman

(Mr. Raju Vetal)

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Employer

Shri A. S. Patil Advocate

For the Workman :

Mr. M. B. Anchan Advocate

Mumbai , Dated : 8th November , 2005

AWARD

TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi, by its Order No. L- 11012/ 11/2003 - IR ( M ) dated 14-08-2003 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication : -

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of Airport Authority of India, Mumbai in terminating the services of Mr. Raju Vetal , Ex- Safaiwala is justified and legal ? If not what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?"

2. On receipt ofOrder of Reference from Government, notices were issued to Management and Workman (Ex. 2) . Advocates for both parties remained present on the first hearing date on 28-10-2003 and filed their respective Vakalatnama. Thereafter the matter was adjourned for filing Statement of Claim at the request of Workman . Since then the matter was adjourned on various dates for filing Statement of Claim . However , the Workman failed to file Statement of Claim . Once again notice was issued to the Workman (Ex . 6) . Notice to Workman returned unserved (Ex. 8). Again notice was issued to Workman to appear on 08-11-2005 (Ex . 9) . The said notice was returned with postal remarks " Left " ( Ex. 11 ) . Advocate for Workman Mr. M. B. Anchan present today and states that he is not aware of the whereabouts of the Workman .

3. In the circumstances the Reference needs to be disposed of for default . Hence the order .

ORDER

Reference stands disposed of for default .

B. 1. KAZI , Presiding Officer 710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 / MAGHA 1 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 276.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नोआमुण्डी ऑयरन ओर माईन्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनबाद नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-26012/3/2000- आई आर ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2005 S.O. 276. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 69/ 2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Dhanbad No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Noamundi Iron Ore Mines of M/ s TISCO Ltd. and their workman , received by the Central Government on 27-12-2005 .

[No. L - 26012/3 /2000 - IR ( M ) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under section 10( 1 ) (d) of the 1. D. Act , 1947 .

Reference No. 69 of 2000

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Noamundi Iron Ore Mines of M/ s . TISCO . Ltd. and their workman .

APPEARANCES : On behalf of the workman

Mr. K. Chakravorty, Advocate On behalf of the employers : Sh D. K. Verma , Advocate State : Jharkhand

Industry : Iron Ore Mines.

Dated , Dhanbad , the 24th November, 2005

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under section 10(1)( d) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 26012 / 3 /2000 / IR ( M ) dated, the 12th July , 2000 .

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Noamundi Iron Mine of M/ s . Tisco . Ltd. in denying employment to the depandant of Shri Jolon Bhuiyan is justified? If not, to what relief the dependant of Late Jolon Bhuiyon is entitled ? " 2. In this case both the parties appeared and filed their respective Written Statement . The case then proceeded along its course . Subsequently at the stage of evidence a petition was filed on behalf of the concerned workman with a prayer for passing ' No dispute ' Award as he is not interested to proceed with the further hearing of the case . Perused the petition and heard the authorised representative on behalf of the management . No objection raised on their side . Since the concerned workman has expressed his reluctance to proceed with the hearing of the case , a ' No dispute? Award is passed in this reference presuming non- existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 277.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 51/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-17012/33/93- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2005 S.O. 277. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 51/94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-12-2005 .

[No. L - 17012/33 /93 - IR (B - II ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT , BANGALORE .

Dated : 7th December, 20005 PRESENT

Shri A. R. Siddiqui , Presiding Officer [ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

711

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

C.R. NO . 51/94

I PARTY

II PARTY

The Sr. Divl . Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India,

P. B. No. 16 , Dharwad- 580001

The General Secretary , C/ o Shri S. B. Timoli , ' Shiva Prasad ' Near Savanur Nawab Bungalow , I Cross , Narayanapur, Dharwad --580008

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub - section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide Order No. L 17012/ 33/93 - IR (B - II ) dated 13th May, 1994 for adjudication on the following Schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India , Dharwad in not absorbing Shri B. L. Babar , Part time Sweeper as full time Sweeper is justified ? If not , to what relief is the said workman entitled to and from which date ? '"

management has not done so deliberately having kept vacancy of full time Sweeper post for a period of about 2 years from 1988. Therefore , the first party raised another dispute resulting into the present reference ; that in October 1988 when the vacancy was created , the Divisional Office , Dharwad recommended the case of the first party to Zonal Office for consideration and his absorption as Full time Sweeper . On 28-8-1990 he was interviewed at Zonal Office for consideration of his request for full time Sweeper but at the last minute he was denied of the said post and a temporary Sweeper was appointed for 2 years and then a widow of deceased employee was appointed as a full time Sweeper; that in April 1991 one full time Sweeper retired from service and at that time again the first party was not considered for the said post . Once again there was an appointment of widow of another deceased employee as a full time Sweeper; that for the second time ALC( C) vide his letter dated 10-1-92 advised the management to appoint him as a full time Sweeper in an additional vacancy and the management once again expressed its inability to appoint him as a full time Sweeper . Therefore , the first party has been making several representations seeking a job of full time Sweeper since 1988 but instead of his case being considered for the said post, the dependents of the deceased employees have been appointed to the said post, that all the full time sweepers now working in Dharwad Divisional Office have got their jobs on compassionate grounds and their chances of promotion to the post of sub staff or in other cadre are practically zero . As such he (first party) will not get the post of full time Sweeper till his retirement and he will be condemned at the entry grade itself; that in 1989 a part time Sweeper by name P.P. Jadhav , who had put in only 5 years of service and was junior to the first party has been given full time post of sub staff i.e. Peon overlooking his seniority . Similarly one Shri Rafiq, part time Electrician has been provided ( ought to have been promoted at Saundatti ) again over looking the seniority much less giving any alternative full time post . Therefore , he requested this Tribunal to pass an award directing the management to provide him full time post of Sweeper from the date of settlement before this Industrial Tribunal , i.e. 17-8-1987 or from 18-11-1987 with all consequential benefits , seniority and back wages .

2. The case of the first party workman as made out in the Claim Statement, in brief, is that he was appointed as a Part time Sweeper in November 1970 with the management Corporation at Dharwad branch and served up to 1976. But his services were discontinued in 1976 illegally on the ground of unauthorized absence . He made a representation to the management to take him back in service but of no avail . Then he raised a dispute before this Tribunal , in CR No. 17/87 and during the course of hearing , the management entered into the settlement before the Tribunal incorporating the terms that the management should reinstate him (first party) with continuity of service with the incidental benefits . The management should give orders of reinstatement within a week . Accordingly, the management reinstated him and gave him the benefits . The management confirmed him as a part time Sweeper vide order dated 22-8-1989 w.e.f. 18-11-1987 . It also deducted Provident Fund from his salary from the date of confirmation i.e. 18-11-1987 . As he was given benefit of continuity of service as per the terms of settlement he made a representation to the management to give him full time Sweeper post in a permanent vacancy with all benefits from 1988 onwards; that in the year 1991 the first party again raised a dispute before the ALC ( C ) , Mangalore and during the course of meeting held in the Conciliation proceedings , the management agreed to appoint him against the permanent vacancy on priority basis , whenever , vacancy arose in future . However , despite several representations made by the first party to implement and absorb him as full time Sweeper , the

3. The management by its Counter Statement admitted that the first party was appointed as a temporary part time sweeper since Novermber 1970 till 10-10-1976 but his services were not permanent and regular . His services were dispensed with in view of his unauthorized absence and alleged negligence of his duties . He approached the Industrial Tribunal , Bangalore and during the hearing , an award was passed on 17-8-87 with a direction to reinstate him in service without backwages . Since the first party was not a regular employee , as on that date his reinstatement could be done by a fresh appointment as part time regular sweeper 55 GI/ 2006-30 712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

[PART 11 -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

their additional pleadings /additional evidence if any in accordance with law.

interalia with clear terms and conditions namely his appointment will be as part time Sweeper with duty of 4 hours, his services will be counted only from 11-10-76 till he joined duty and that he will not be entitled for any wages; that after having accepted those terms the first party joined duty on 18-11-87 and he was reinstated in service without beckwages and service benefits except continuity of service ; that once again the first party approached the conciliation officer with a request to absorb his services as a full time sweeper and the officer in turn advised the Sr. Divisional Manager of the management corporation to explore the possibility of absorbing him in the post of sub staff as a part time sweeper which did not demand special skill within the frame work of existing recruitment/ promotion rules ; that the rules provide only for recruitment of permanent staff to a full time worker but not a part time worker as per the existing LIC of India Recruitment Instructions 1979 by calling applications from public and through employment exchange to compete with others for the vacancies . Therefore , question of considering the request of the first party for absorption did not arise . Accordingly ALC ( C) , Mangalore was informed . Therefore , the conciliation ended in failure on 31-3-93 resulting into the present reference; that the management corporation is unable to absorb the first party under existing statutory rules of the Corporation ( LIC ) Clauses III and IV Recruitment Rules 1993 which replaced instruction of LIC, 1979. Therefore , the corporation cannot fill any permanent post by absorption of any employee in the lower grade without following the aforesaid rules subject to satisfaction of other eligibility conditions ; that there is no provision for full time sweeper post in branch offices of the corporation at present and that when ever there arises a vacancy the matter will be taken up to fill up the said vacancy in terms of the aforesaid instructions , 1993 ; that the contention of the first party that subsequent to his reinstatement vacancies arose in various branches and they have been filed up by appointing on compassionate grounds are not true and correct . However , appointments on compassionate ground from spouses of employees who died while in service in the cadre of permanent full time employees of Record Clerk and Sepoy have been considered by the management under the provisions of aforesaid instructions , 1979 ; that the first party was not interviewed by Zonal Office on 28-8-90 as claimed by him . Therefore , reference is liable to be rejected.

5. After the remand , the management examined one Smt . Latha Kulkarni said to be Administrative Officer at Dharwad Division as MWI to M4 . The first party who was already examined as WWI before the aforesaid award was passed once again further examined chief himself and got two documents marked at Ex. WI and W2. The gist of his statement in his examination chief is on line with the various contentions taken by him in his claim statement . Therefore , need not be repeated once again. In his further examination chief however, he added to say that he is a regular part time sweeper as per his reappointment order made in the year 1987 and that as per the rules of the management vide rule No. 7 as per Ex . M3 , services of regular part time sweepers are to be confirmed if they have discharged duties continuously for 6 months , satisfactorily . Like wise the statement of MW1 in his examination chief is in tune with the stand taken by the management in its counter statement . I would like to refer to their statements in cross examination and the aforesaid documents produced on their behalf as and when it is found relevant and necessary . Learned Counsel for the management submitted his written argument once again reiterating the various contentions taken by it in the Counter Statement taking support of the statement of MW1 as well as by the statement made by the first party in his cross examination . The sum and substance of the arguments advanced by counsel for the management is that it is a statutory corporation and the terms and conditions of the recruitment shall necessarily be according to the recruitment rules governing the same , be it temporary or permanent namely , LIC of India Staff Regulations in respect of permanent appointment and part time employment rules framed by the corporation . He referred to the rules at Ex . M1 and M2 framed by the Corporation in support of the said arguments . His next argument was that the reinstatement of first party made pursuance to the compromise entered before this Tribunal , was in his capacity as a part time sweeper and not as a regular part time sweeper and therefore, on the basis of the above said compromise he cannot claim absorption of his services as a permanent part time sweeper . He contended that name of the employee has to be sponsored through Employment Exchange as and when the vacancy arises and the employee has to compete with others in the interview held by the interview committee of the management corporation . The management also is going to consider the case of the first party in future whenever the vacancy arises as per the recrutiment rules and regulations referred to supra . Learned Counsel also cited the following decisions in support of his argument:

i. ii . AIR 1982 SC 1126 (2 ) 1982 Lab IC SC- 161 . CA Nos 4216-19 of 1993 with CA No. 3940 of1994.

4. Earlier to this , my learned predecessor by his award dated 6-9-01 allowed the reference on hand with a direction to the management to absorb the first party permanent post without any other benefits including back wages . Aggreived by this award , the management approached the Hon'ble High Court in WP No. 20078/02 and his Lordship of Hon'ble High Court by order dated 22-2-05 set aside the award passed by this tribunal and remanded the matter back to this tribunal for fresh disposal giving opportunity to both the parties to place 713

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

CA Nos . 2173 , 1879 of 1972 and 1655 of 1973 , 115 of 1974

iv CA No. 8269 of 1997

V. 2004 (7 ) Scale 682

vi . Writ Petition No. 3039 of 1991

vii . Ref. of 1 of 2000 in the Central Govt : Industrial Tribunal , Kolkata .

6. Whereas , learned counsel for the first party in his argument submitted that the first party is in service ofthe management continuously for the last 29 years but his services were not being regularized only on the ground that his name has not being sponsored through Empolyment Exchange which is the condition precedent to consider his case for absorption of the services . He then contended that records now called for and marked at Ex . M4 series would disclose that the other employees similarly situated have been made permanent and whereas , he has been discriminated through out his service . Learned Counsel also submitted that the first party is now left with only 18 months of service for his retirement and therefore, his case may be considered at least on humanitarian ground .

7. The facts , un-disputed in this case are that the first party joined the services of the management as a temporary part time sweeper in the year 1970 and was removed from service from in the year 1976 on the ground of unauthorized absence . As noted above, the first party after having raised an industrial dispute resulting into the reference before the Industrial Tribunal , Bangalore , i.e. before this tribunal , got himself reistated in service in the month of November 1987 at the result of the settlement arrived at between him and the management in light of the conditions referred to supra in the counter statement filed by the management . It is again not in dispute that right from the year 1987 onwards , the first party went on agitating his claim for absorption of his services as a permanent part time sweeper but failed to get the above said relief at the hands of the management . It is now on record that once again in the year 1993 the first party approached ALC( C), Mangalore seeking the relief of absorption of his services as permanent part time sweeper and since the management did not agree to his claim , conciliation failed resulting into the present reference .. As noted above , the claim of first party is just based on the fact that he has been in the service of the management right from the year 1970 onwards and therefore , injustice has been caused to him in not making him permanent part time sweeper though on several occasions vacancies for the said post arose but were filled up by the management by some others not considering his case only on the ground that his name did not come through Employment Exchange whenever applicationsv called for by the management through the said agency . In order to substantiate his case that his case was not considered in preference to others , the first party called

upon the managements to produce certain documents to prove his point that many others who were working as temporary part time sweepers have been made permanent. In response to the said application and in pursuance to the order passed by this tribunal , the management produced 3 appointment orders at Ex . M4 series in respect of one Mr. Shri S.L. Chouhan , Shri S. Naraiyya , Shri S. Hadpad . A Xerox copy of the appointment order in favour of Shri Gurappa at Ex . WI was also produced by the first party in support of his said contention . The management while producing the aforesaid documents in its application has given the details and the circumstances under which the persons/ employees have been given the aforesaid appointment letters . With regard to the aforesaid Shri S. Nararaiyya it is stated by the management that he was appointed as full time sweeper in the year 1998 after his name was sponsored by Employment Excahnge . He was appointed as a regular full time sweeper after being appointed initially as a regular part time sweeper . With regard to the said Hadpad it is stated that he was appointed as regular part time Sweeper at LIC , Gadak branch after his name had been sponsored through the Employment Exchange . With regard to Smt . Malathi Mane the management stated that she had been appointed as a full time sweeper w.e.f. 19-3-81 and she was discharged from duties on medical ground on 8-10-97 . As far as above said S.L. Chouhan is concerned , the management stated that he was appointed as a sweeper once again , his name being sponsored through Employment Exchange and in response to his application dated 12-4-76 , as per appointment order dated 15-4-76 . In respect of details called for by the first party with regard to the employees by name S/ Shri A.Y. Poojar , S.D. Mane , P. Madar , P.P. Oadhar , the management stated that said Poojar and Mane are not on its roll and they are not in the service of the management corporation . With regard to said P. Madar it is stated that he was appointed as full time sweeper and therefore , there is no question of appointment order being produced before this tribunal . As far as Shri P.P. Oadhar is concerned the management stated that no such person has been appointed by LIC, Dharwad Divisional Office as claimed by the first party. Onthis point the management witness in his examination chief has stated that the Xerox copy of the appointment letters marked at Ex . M4 series have been produced by the management and for rest of the workers no appointment letters are available as they are no more in service . During the course of argument, learned counsel for the first party was not able to point out as to how the aforesaid appointment orders at Ex. M4 series were made by the management in violation of the aforesaid instruction , 1979 and instruction , 1993 brought on record before this tribunal by the management at Ex. M1 & M2 . As could be read from the abovesaid explanation given by the management in the application filed along with those appointment letters and from the statement of MW1 , those appointment letters have been issued to [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

his own words he did not get through the interview held in the year 1990. Therefore , he cannot make any grievance for not being selected in the said interview. His contention that he was reinstated in service in November 1987 as a regular part time sweeper and therefore , he should have been made permanent after rendering six months services satisfactorily vide circular dated 30-7-1987 marked before this tribunal at Ex . M3 . I do not find much substance in his above said contention . There is no order of reinstatement either produced by him or by the management . If we go by the terms and conditions of the reinstatement as made out in the counter statement of the management not disputed by the first party in his deposition of in the course of examination of MWI , it can be very well seen that he can be reinstated in service subject to the conditions that he well not claim backwages and other incidental benefits except the benefit of continuity of service .

aforesaid employees appointing them as full time sweepers itself and that they have not been absorbed in services as a permanent part time sweepers after having worked as temporary part time sweepers . In fact the appointment of said Shri Hadpad was independent appointment as a Watchman , nothing to do with the work of sweeper . Therefore , the contention of the first party that the other employees working as temporary part time sweepers have been made permanent part time sweepers ignoring his claim and seniority does not get substantiated by the oral and documenatary evidence brought on record . The rules of recruitment of Clause III & IV , instructions issued vide Ex . Ml and M2 as Instructions , 1979 and 1993 would lend support to the defence taken by the management that in case of selection of Class IV employees in the present case temporary part time sweeper as a full time part time sweeper, the corporation has to follow the rules of getting the names of the candidates through Employment Exchange and the temporary part time workman to claim the post of permanent part time workman must compete with the outsiders and on the basis of the selection in the interview he shall be selected as permanent part time sweeper and not otherwise . The various decisions taken support of by the management referred to supra also would make it abundantly clear that in order of regularise the services of the temporary employees process of regularization in the light of the rules prescribed by the management corporation shall had to be followed and such of the employees shall be selected having been found suitable for such appointment by a duly constituted selection committee . Their Lordship of Supreme Court in the above said decisions have disapproved the selection of the employees in violation of the recruitment rules framed by the management concerned. Therefore , the first party in this case also cannot claim the post of permanent part time sweeper , by passing the above said recruitment rules framed by the management corporation .

9. A perusal of the memorandum of settlement in CR No. 17/87 ( records called for ) Xerox copy of which is marked in this case as W3 for the sake of identification , it can be very well seen that as per the said settlement between the parties the first party was taken back in service foregoing his back wages including the other incidental benefits except the benefit of continuity of service . Therefore , it cannot be said that the first party was reinstated in service as a regular part time sweeper so as to confirm his services as per the above said rule 7 vide Ex. M3 . Therefore , viewed from any angle the claim of the first party seeking the relief of absorption of his services as a permanent part time sweeper cannot be granted in the light of the evidence brought on record and the discussion made above on the said evidence . However, we cannot at the same ignore the fact that the first party has been in the service of the management right from the year 1970 onwards , of course , with some break in between . It is very unfortunate to see that the first party having served the management continuously for such a long period has not been given the benefit of permanent job so as to get service benefits on his retirement. Therefore , keeping in view the fact that the first party has been in the service of the management fore almost 3 decades and now is going to retire within next 18 months from today onwards , it appears to me that ends ofjustice will be met if the management, atleast , at this stage consider the case of the first party for absorption of his services as a permanent part time sweeper in order to enable him to get the service benefits as well as pensionary benefits . Hence reference is answered and accordingly following award is passed.

AWARD

Reference is rejected . However, the management is directed to consider the case of the first party on humanitarian ground taking into account his length of service to absorb his services as a permanent part time 8. Now the next question tobe considered would be 'whether the name of the first party was sponsored through Employment Exchange at any point of time during his service and whether he was interviewed for the post of permanent part time sweeper at any point of time' . It is the case of the management that in the year 1976 the first party's name was sponsored through Employement Exchange and he was interviewed for the said post but did not get through the said interview . Whereas , it is case of the first party that in the year 1990 he had appeared for such an interview but at the last minute in his place somebody else was selected . Therefore , if we act upon the above said submissions made by the management and so also the very contention taken by the first party , it cannot be said that he was not given an opportunity to appear for an interview for the post of permanent part time sweeper his name being sponsored through Employment Exchange. In [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

sweeper within 6 months from the date of publication of this award . The order giving effect to his job as permanent part time sweeper shall be w.e.f. the date of this award . No order to cost.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 7th December , 2005 )

A.R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 278.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार चोऊगुले एंड कम्पनी लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुंबई नं . 1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 51/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-29012/57/2000- आई आर (विविध ) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2005 S.O. 278.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 51 / 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Mumbai No. I now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s . Chowgule & Company Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Govemment on 27-12-2005 .

[No. L- 29012/57 /2000-IR (M) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , MUMBAI PRESENT :

Justice Ghanshyam Dass , Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . CGIT -51 OF 2000 PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management ofM /s . Chowgule and Company Ltd. And

Chowgule Employees Union .

APPEARANCES :

For the Management : Mr. R.N. Shah , Advocate For the Workman

715

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

"Whether the demand of Chowgule Employees Union , Goa, for payment of wages to three workers namely S/ Shri Vatu P. Gaude, Premanand J. Gaude , Vinayak P. Naik from January, 1999 to 19th October, 1999 by M/s . Chowgule & Co. Ltd. Goa, is legal and justified ? If so , to what relief the workmen are entitled?"

2. The reference in question relates to three workmen namely; S/Shri . Vatu P. Gaude, Premanand J. Gaude , and Vinayak P. Naik ( hereinafter referred to as ' workmen ' for short ) working with M/ s . Chowgule and Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the " company " for short).

3. The admitted position is that the workmen were working with the company at Pale Mines establishment since the year 1994. In the month of November 1998 , there was an illegal strike in which the workmen in question were amongst the striking workers and with an active support of some other villagers assaulted Mr. V.N. Pandey , General Manager (Mines ) and Mr. B.M. Salunkhe Dy . General Manager (Administration) on 26-12-1998 . the assault took place at Par Khandepar when the two Managers were on their way home from pale after attending office . The assault was so grave that Mr. Salunkhe succumbed to his injuries and Mr. Pande was away from duty till February 2000. The investigation was made by the police wherein certain workers were arrested and some other absconding being involved in the murder of Mr. Salunkhe .

4. The workmen of the company started resuming duties from the month of January 1999 and they were accordingly allowed to join the duties on different dates. The workmen under reference did not report to duty at all . They actually reported for duty in the month of July 1999. They were not allowed to resume duty but asked to go to the Police and get a clearance from the Police Authorities to which the workmen did not comply . The company itself got clearance from the Police and there upon the workmen were allowed to resume duties w.e.f. 20thOctober 1999 .

Mr. V.A. Pai , Advocate

Maharashtra

State :

Mumbai , dated the 4th day of December , 2005

AWARD

1. This is a reference made by the Central Govemment in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub- section 1 and sub - section 2A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( the Act for short) . Vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi. , order No. L - 29012/ 57 /2000/ 1R ( M ) dated 20-9-2000 . The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows :

55 G1 /2006-31

5. The contention of the workmen is that they continuously approached the company to permit to resume duty since January 1999 and in fact they wrote to the company on 17th July 1999 and thereafter on 6th August 1999 but they were illegally not allowed to resume the duties till 19th October 1999. Hence they are entitled to wages since January 1999 to 19th October 1999 as they were not allowed to resume the duties by the company . The workmen were not absent on account of their fault . They were not in a position to perform duties as the company did not permit them . They are entitled to full wages from January 1999 to 19th October 1999.

6. The contention of the company is in view of the gravity of the assault and murder of Mr. Salunkhe , it asked the workmen to get clearance from the Police Authorities but workmen did not approach the Police at 716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

all . The company itself got clearance from the Police and thereafter permitted the workmen to resume duties w.e.f. 20th October , 1999. In fact , the management did allowto resume duties on different dates as and when the workmen approached the company to resume duties . There were in all 147 workers including the workmen ander reference , and all the workmen except the workmen in question were permitted to resume the duties in January, February , March and April , 1999. The workmen ander reference were permitted to join duties on 20th October , 1999. The workmen have not come up with clean hands . It is false to allege that they continuously approached the company since January, 1999 till the date of their joining.

7. It is clear from the perusal from the written statement that the workmen actually approached the office of the company in July , 1999 for permission to resume the duty bu. they were asked to get a report from the police; but they did not obtain any report . The company got the clearance itself and permitted the workmen to resume the duties on 20-10-1999 .

8. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the evidence available on record.

9. The facts of the present case are not in dispute . There was a strike in November 1998 , there was assault in December. 1998 in which one Manager died and another suously injured . It was natural that the Police case was there and the workmen went underground . When the matter continued to subside , the workmen started approaching the company they were accordingly allowed to resume the duties on different dates as evident from the chart filed by the company . There is no evidence at all on record to show that the workmen under reference actually approached the company in January , 1999. This assertion of the workmen is apparently false since the police was investigating into the matter and the involvement of the workmen under reference was very much there, it was natural for them to keep themselves away from the police for some time. No doubt , the other workmen started resunting duties in January , February , March and April , 1999 but no evidence whatsoever is available to show that the workmen under reference also approached the company for duty during these period. The workmen have not come with clean hands . It is clear that the workmen when realized that the matter was subsided, they approached the company in July, 1999 and wrote letter on 17th July, 1999 and thereafter on 6th August , 1999. It as natural conduct of the company to bave asked the workmen to get the chasene from the Police . It is the

[PART 11--St .3 ( i ) ] admitted position that the workmen were asked by the company to get the clearance from the Police and they did not approach the police . The matter was intervened by the Union of the workers . It appears that the company thereupon obtained clearance from the Police and then permitted them to resume the duties from 20th October , 1999. The action of the company camot be said to be arbitrary in any manner. It can neither be tenned to be malafide. The company never acted in a fashion which may be termed to be against the law . The company accommodated the workers by getting itself clearance from the police and then permitting them to resarne duties in October , 1999.

10. In view of the above, the action of the company in permitting the workmen to resume duties from 20-10-99 appears to be just and fair. The workmen did not work at all from January till 20-10-1999 . They were not illegally refrained from daty by the company and hence they cannot claim wages for the aforesaid period. Hence the demand of the workmen for payment of wages from January, 1999 to 19th October , 1999 cannot be said to be legal and justified . I therefore, conclude that the workmen are not entitled to any relief.

11. The reference is accordingly answered .

Justice GHANSHYAM DASS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 279.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स टिम्बली एन्टरप्राइजेज के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार ओद्योगिक अधिकरण मुंबई नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 112/2000 ) को प्रकाशत करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-29011/53/2000 आई आर ( विविध ) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2005 S.O. 279. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 112/ 20000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum- Labour Coan , Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s Timblo Enterprises and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27-12-2005 .

[No. L 29011/53/2000BR ( M ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Sees .

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 AT MUMBAI

PRESENT

B.1 . Kazi , Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2/ 112 OF 2000

AND

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. TIMBLO ENTERPRISES THEIR WORKMEN

(Goa Mining Labour Welfare Union) Appearances:

For the Employer : Shri M.S. Bandodkar , Advocate

: For the workman

717

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 21 , 2006 /माघ 1 , 1927

Shri Suhaas Naik, Advocate

Mumbai , dated the 9th November , 2005

AWARD

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , by its order No. L - 29011 / 53 /2000 / 1R (M) dated 10-11-2000 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1) and sub section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Timblo Enterprises , Goa in terminating the services of Shri Sunil Parab , Pump Operator w.e.f. June 1998 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled for? "

2 The Second Party has filed Statement of Claim vide Ex. 7. The brief facts are that the Second Party Workman was employed as a Pump Operator at Tollem Mines ofM/s . Timblo Enterprieses w.e.f. 1-10-1995 . While performing the Pump Operator duty which includes operation and maintenance of the water pump , on 21-4-1996 he slipped and fell down on the pump and sustained injuries to his right eye and lost his right eye permanently . The Workman after taking treatment resumed work on 26-6-1996 and was deployed at the workshop/ garage of the Management . He continued to work there till 15-6-1998 on 25-5-1998 the Workman filed a claim for compensation before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Government of Goa to the tune of Rs . 70,000/- . The Manager of the employer Mr. A. Prajapathi asked the workman to withdraw the claim filed by him before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation. The Workman refused to withdraw the claim and therefore he was refused employment w.e.f. 15-06-1998 . The Workman contends that he was arbitrarily refused employment and that no termination letter was issued and orally informed that his services have been terminated . The Workman approached the Union and the matter was taken up under conciliation before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) . Before the Conciliation Officer the Management denied that the Workman was refused employment and contended that the Workman would be offered the same settlement as offered to the other 76 Workmen whose services were also terminated. The Workman states that after terminating him new Pump Operator was employed in his place and that the action of the management is illegal, unjustified and in violation of law on the grounds that the refusal of employment is in contravention of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, 1947, no proper opportunity of hearing was given, no show cause notice nor charge sheet was issued before termination, that his family is solely dependent on his income and that the Management failed to consider the valuable and unblemish and efficient service rendered by him continuously for many years .

3. By Ex.9 , the First Party had submitted Written Statement . The brief facts are that the First Party Management at no point of time terminated the Second Party and that he himself did not attended the work after 30-6-1998 and that the Second Party Workman raised the dispute only on 14-3-2010 after two years . The First Party Management states that the Second Party Workman has no lien over the employment and that he has not completed 240 days in any of the year from the date of his joining. The First Party Management states that the Second Party Workman was having a contract with its principal and the said contract was terminated by the principal on 19-03-1999 as the Tollem Mine in which the workman was employed was closed w.c.f. 19-3-1999 and that the entire Workmen were terminated and paid their legal dues arising out of the closure .

4. The Management states that the Workman was given work as and when work was available with them. On 21-04-1996 he was allotted the work of Pump Operator at Tollem Mine and he left the place of work and due to his negligence he lost his eye. The First Party Management had spent thousands of rupees on his treatment and on humanitarian grounds he was given work in a garage as temporary Workman w.e.f. (03-10-1996 where he worked intermittently till 30-06-1998 . The Management states that since they have closed their entire activities from 19-03-1999 in the said Tollem Mine the workman cannot be appointed as Pump Operator at the said place. They deny that they have terminated the service of the workman from June 1998 and also deny that their action is illegal unjust or bad in law.

5. The workman has submitted a Rejoinder by Ex . 10 . He denies the entire averments in the Written Statement .

718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006/MAGHA 1 , 1927

6. By Ex.13 the Workman has filed List of Witnesses and by Ex.15 List of Documents .

7. By Ex. 14 the first Party Management filed List of Documents and List of Witnesses .

8. By Ex . 16 the Second Party Workman submitted his affidavit and by Ex.25 filed affidavit of Shri Deepak Naik. Both were cross examined by Advocate of the first Party.

9. By Ex.30 First Party Management filed documents . The Second Party Workman did not close his evidence . By Ex.32 he filed an application for iinpleading M/ s . Timblo Pvt . Ltd. as opponent in the dispute . By Ex.33 the first party Management filed their say . The matter was kept for hearing on Ex.32 .

10. During the pendency of the case for nearing on Ex.32 , both the parties have amicabley arrived at a Settlement . Today ( i.e. 09-11-2005) Advocates for both the parties appeared before the Tribunal and produced the Settlement as Ex.45 . The workman has accepted a sum of Rs . 75,000/- and pray that award be passed in terms of the said Settlement. Since the dispute is settled, following order is passed :

ORDER

Reference stands disposed of as settled vide Settlement dated 09-11-2005 vide Ex.45.

B.I. KAZI , Presiding Officer.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI Ref. No CGIT - 2/112 of 2000

Parties :

Employer in relation to the management of M/ s . Timblo Enterprises.

AND

Their workman : Mr. Sunil Parab

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

It is submitted that parties to the above reference have amicable settled the subject matter on the following terms.

1. It is agreed between the parties that the Management of M/ s Timblo Enterprises shall pay a sum of Rs. 75,000 (Rupees Seventy five Thousand only) to Mr. Sunil parab in full and final settlement of all his claims which shall include the earned wages , bonus , gratuity , leave encashment , overtime , notice pay , or any other benefit which can be computed in terms of money, etc. If any arising out of his employment and claims arising out of the reference mentioned herein above .

2. It is agreed by the workman that they shall accept

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] the said amount mentioned hercinabove clause No.1 , in full and final settlement of all his claims arising out of his employment with the company and shall acknowledge the said amount by way of receipt duly signed by him/ them and further confirm that nothing further benefits are due and payable to him by the company or associate concern which can be computed in terms of money , and this settlement shall satisfy all his claims including the claim under reference and any claim of reinstatement and/or reemployment .

3. It is further agreed by the parties that out of the amount mentioned in the clause No. 1 the inanagement shall issue a cheque of Rs . 67,000 in the name of Mr. Sunil Parab whereas a cheque of Rs. 8,000 shall be drawn in the name of Goa Mining Labour Welfare Union and Parties shall acknowledge the payment by way of receipt .

4. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties, it is respectfully prayed that an award be passed in terms of this settlement and the reference be disposed offaccordingly.

For Workman/ Party I For Employer/Partyll

M/ sTimblo Enterprises

Mr. Sunil Parat

RADHAS . TIMBLO SoleProprietress

Adv . for Workmen/Union Adv.for Employer/ Party II

Place : Mumbai Date 9-11-2005

RECEIPT

Received from M/ s Timblo Enterprises , Goa , a sum of Rs 75,000 ( Rupees Seventy five Thousand only ) by way of cheques in full and final settlement of all the claims of whatsoever nature including the earned wages , bonus , gratuity , leave encashment , overtime , notice pay, or any other benefit which can be computed in terms of Money, etc if any, arising out of my employment and claims arising out of the reference No.CGIT -2/ 112/02 pending before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and further confirm that I have no claim of whatsoever nature against the company or its associate concern which can be coniputed in terms of money , including the claim of reinstatement and/or reemployment .

Cheque No. 875357 dated 7-11-2005 Drawn on ICICI Bank in the name of Mr. Sunil Parab for Rs . 67,000 and cheque No. 875358 dated 7-11-05 drawn on Goa in favour of Goa Mining Labour Welfare Union for Rs . 8,000 .

Place : Mumbai

Sd/- Sunil Parab Date:

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 280.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुंबई न .1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 46/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30011/10/2000- आई आर ( विविध ) ]

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2005 S.O. 280.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 46/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Mumbai No. I as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of O.N.G.C. Ltd. , NSE Plaza, 4th floor , Bandra Kurla and their workman , received by the Central Government on 27-12-2005 .

[No. L - 30011 / 10/2000- IR ( M)] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 MUMBAI

PRESENT

JUSTICE GHANSHYAM DASS

Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . CGIT -46 OF 2000 PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of O.N.G.C Ltd.

AND

Their workman .

APPEARANCES :

For the workman

: Mr. Talreja, Adv.

: Mr. J.P. Sawant , Adv .

For the employers

State

: Maharashtra

Mumbai , dated the 02nd day of December 2005 .

AWARD

This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under clause ( d) of sub section 1 and sub section 2A of Section 10 of the Industrial 55-9 MSS 330-348

719

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

Disputes Act 1947 (the Act for short) . Vide Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour, New, Delhi . , order No. L- 30011 /10/2000/ 1R ( M) dated 18-8-2000 . The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows :

SCHEDULE

" Whether the action of the management of O.N.G.C. Ltd , Mumbai , in not granting full time status to the two workmen Mrs. Jeevi Laxman and Mrs. Pramila Maru , w.e.f. 1-10-1997 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled ? "

2. The parties filed their State of Claim and written statement.

3. The matter came up for hearing today. An application is being moved today by the learned counsel for the workman which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the Opposite Party , O.N.G.C. Ltd. wherein the prayer is being made that the reference may kindly be disposed of for want of prosecution.

4. Since the workman do not want to prosecute the reference , I do not have any other option but to dismiss it as prayed and justify the action of the management . The workmen are not entitled to any relief.

5. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

Ghanshyam Dass , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 281.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नोआमुण्डी आयरन ओर माईन्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनबाद नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 68/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-26012/4/2000- आई आर ( विविध ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2005 S.O. 281.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the Award Ref. 68/2000 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Dhanbad No , 2 as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Noamundi Iron Ore Mines of M/ s TISCO Ltd. and their workman , which was received by theCentral Government on 27-12-2005 .

[No. L- 26012 /4/2000- IR ( M ) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 21 , 2006 /MAGHA 1 , 1927

720

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

Shri B. Biswas . Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under section 10( 1 ) ( d ) of the 1. D. Act . 1947 .

REFERENCE NO . 68 of 2000

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Noamaindi Iron Ore Mines of M/ s . TISCO. Ltd. and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

On behalf of the workman : Mr. K. Chakrovorty , Advocate

On behalf of the employers: Mr.D.K.Verma Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry. Coal Dhanbad. Dated , the 24th November, 2005

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under section 10( 1) (d) of the 1.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal adjudication vide their Order No. L -26012 /4/2000 / IR ( M ) dated, the 4th July, 2000.

SCHEDULE

Whether the action of the management of Noamundi Iron Ore Mine of TISCO Ltd. in denying employment to smt. Kunti kerai wife of late M. S. Kerai is justified ? If not , to whant relief smt . Kimti Kerai is entitled ?"

2. In this case both the parties appeared and filed their respective Written Statement . The case then proceeded along its course Subsequently at the state of evidences a petition was filed on behalf of the concerned workman with a prayer for passing No dispute Award as he is not interested to proceed with further hearing of the case. Persued the petition and heard the authorised representative on behalf of the management . No objection raised on their side . Since the concerned workman has exprssed his reluctance to proceed with the hearing of the case, a No dispute Award is passed in this referencee presuming non- existence of any industrialdispute between the parties .

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 282.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक

[ PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) | अधिकरण मुंबई न.1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 32/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

सं. एल-31012/ 3/2000 - आई आर ( विविध ) ] į

बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 27th December , 2005

S.O. 282. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 32/ 2000 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Mumbai No 1 as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of ONGC Ltd .. NSE Plaza , 4th floor , Bandra Kurla and their workman, receivedby the C'entral Government on 27-12- 2005.

[No. L-31012/3 /2000 - IR ( M ) B. M. DAVID , Under Secy ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 MUMBAI

PRESENT

JUSTICE GHANSHYAM DASS

Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 32 OF 2000

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management ofO.N.G.C Lid .

AND

Transport and Dock Workers Union

APPEARANCES :

: Mr. Talreja , Adv .

For the workman

: Mr. Koyande Adv .

For the Union

State

: Maharashtra

Mumbai, dated the 06th December 2005 .

AWARD

This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under clause ( d ) of sub Section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (the Act for short ) vide Government of India , Ministry of Labour, New , Delhi.. Order No. L -31012 /3 /2000 / IR ( M ) dated 31-5-2000 . The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of ONGC Ltd in not extending the benefits of Memorandum of Understanding dated 12-7-1995 to Mr. Abdul Kayum. A'C Operator and six others employed at [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

O.N.G.C. , Vasundhara , MRBC , w.e.f. 1-4-1994 till 31-5-96 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workmen are entitled ? "

2. The Transport and Dock Workers Union , Mumbai ( hereinafter referred to as the " Union " for short) has raised the instant dispute on behalf of its members namely Abdul Kayam and 06 others who were employed as Air Condition Operators at the office of the O.N.G.C. , Vasudhara Bhavan , Bandra ( E) , Mumbai ( hereinafter referred to as the " workmen " for short ) The O.N.G.C. has several establishment at different places and employs several contractors to get its work done and M/ s . Blue Star Ltd. is one of them duly appointed as contractor to carry out maintenance and operation of Air condition plants maintainedby O.N.G.C. The wage scales and service condition of contract workers are decided by Settlement , Memorandum of Understanding with the O.N.G.C., the employer and the Transport Dock workers Union , Mumbai . The present dispute has arisen on account of non - implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 12-7-1995 which was made effective w.e.f. 01-4-1994 . According to this MOU the workmen were entitled to revised wages etc. w.e.f. 01-4-1994 but they have been given w.e.f. 01-6-1996 . Thus , the workmen are not being paid the difference in wages for the period w.e.f. 1-4-1994 to 31-5-1996 by the O.N.G.C. through its contractor M/ s . Blue Start Ltd.

3. During the course of pendency of the instant reference the O.N.G.C. requested this tribunal for impleadment of M/ s . Blue Start as a party. The request was granted by my predecessor in office but M/s . Blue Star failed to appear despite service of notice and contest the dispute.

4. The contention of the O.N.G.C. is this much only that it cannot be made liable for implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding since it is not the employer of the contract labour appointed by M/s . Blue Star. The existence of MOU dt . 12-7-1995 is not disputed. The legal plea is being raised that there is no relationship of employer and employee and hence the reference is not maintainable .

5. The parties have lead the evidence consisting of oral as well as documentary .

6. The parties have filed written submissions and have made oral submission too .

7. The short question which arises for consideration is as to whether the O.N.G.C. is bound by . the MOU dt . 12-7-1995 and hence its action for not extending the benefit to the workmen is illegal .

8. The admitted position is that the workman were appointed by Blue Star but it also the admitted position that M/ s . Blue Star was a contractor duly appointed by

721

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 21 , 2006/माघ 1 , 1927

O.N.G.C. , to get its work done . In these back ground , the O.N.G.C. , became the principal employer to get work done through contractor . The liability of O.N.G.C. is there in view of the MOU dt . 12-7-1995 which was reduced to writing after the MOU reached between the management ofO.N.G.C. and the Union representing cause of contract workmen viz . Transport and Dock Workers Unin , Mumbai over the issue of Regulation of Contract Labour and payment of their Wages The relevant clauses of the aforesaid MOU are being quoted below:

(N) It shall be obligatory on the part of the concerned Contractor who will be entering into various job contracts with O.N.G.C. to fulfill various obligations laid down under various Labour statutes like EPF & Misc . Provisions Act . ESI Act , Workmen Compensation Act, Shops & Establishment Act , Factories Act , Payment of Wages Act , Payment of Bonus Act , Contract Workmen (R & E ) Act, etc.

(O) This understandings as arrived above during the conciliation proceedings shall be without prejudice to the final decisions which may be given in Writ Petitions filed by various unions and are pending before the Hon'ble High Court at Bombay in respect of contract labour and their wages and conditions of service.

(P) O.N.G.C. will ensure that arrears on account of MOU towards revised wages , allowances and consequential benefits such as PF, ESIC Bonus , etc. will be paid to the contract workmen through the contractors on or before 15-10-95 . The contractor shall not make any deduction from arrears payable except the deductions provided under various labour enactments .

(Q) Whatever other benefits not mentioned in the settlement above , but are being provided to employees of the various contractors , at present will continue to be provided.

(R) The job concerned contractors shall enter into an agreement under the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , incorporating the terms of this understanding , with the concerned Union of its workmen within 30 days of the award of the job contract to them by O.N.G.C. 9. A plain reading of the aforesaid clause makes it clear that it was obligatory for O.N.G.C. to ensure the payment of arrears on account of MOU and other benefits by the various other contractors . It is also clear that the concerned contractors were required to enter into an agreement under the Industrial Dispute Act incorporating the terms this MOU with the concerned Union of its workmen within 30 days of the award of the job contract to them by O.N.G.C.

11. In the instant case it is not known as to under what circumstances the MOU which was made applicable w.e.f. 1-4-94 was not put into implementation and the 722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 21 , 2006/ MAGHA 1 , 1927

payment of arrears with effect from the said date was not made to the workmen by M/ s . Blue Star Ltd.It is surprising that M/s . Blue Star Ltd. despite service of notice, failed to appear before this tribunal and appraise the tribunal its stand on the subject matter and reason for non payment . The O.N.G.C. does not have the knowledge of the reasons for non payment of wages to the workmen . In view of the MOU , the O.N.G.C. is apparently liable to ensure the payment to the workmen . It has not been done so . No doubt , the primary responsibility of payment lies with M / s . Blue Star Ltd. It isfor the O.N.G.C. to see as to how the payment of arrears is to be ensured to the workmen and as to how it compels M/ s . Blue Star Ltd. to make the payment. The fact remains that the workmen are entitled to the difference in wages w.e.f. 1-4-1994 . The workmen have come up with clean hands that they have been paid the wages w.e.l. 1-6-1996 but the reasons for non payment of wages with effect from the date of implementation of the MOU i.e. 1-4-1994 is not clear on record .

11. The reference cannot be said to be not main- tainable since it has been made by the Government under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act and also the MOU in question which was admittedly arrived at in between the Union and its management . The O.N.G.C. cannot raise the question at this juncture that the reference is bad and not maintainable against the workmen .

12. The rulings relied uponby the learned counsel for the O.N.G.C. reported in 1985 II LLJ page 4, The workmen of Food Corporation of India vs. food Corporation of India , AIR 2001 Supreme Court 3527 between Steel Authority of India Ltd. and other vs. National Union Water Front Workers and others and 1996 11 CLR 610 SC between Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Labour and Others does not help the O.N.G.C. on the facts and circumstances above .

13. It may be observed that in view of the law laid down in the case of Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd, the O.N.G.C. becomes principal employer and hence liable for consequences .

14. In view of what has been discussed above , I conclude that the workmen are entitled to claim the difference in wages for the period in question from M/ s . Blue Star Ltd. and it is the responsibility of the O.N.G.C. to ensure the payment from M / s. Blue Star Ltd. as per MOU in question .

15. The reference is answered accordingly. GHANSHYAM DASS, Presiding Officer

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी , 2006

का. आ. 283.- केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित मेंऐसा करना अपेक्षित था , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2640 दिनांक 14-7-2005 द्वारा करेंसी नोट प्रेस, नासिक रोड़ जो कि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 25 में शामिल है, को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 15-7-2005 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है ;

अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 15-1-2006 से छः मास की कालावधिके लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[फा.सं. एस -11017/2/ 2006 आई आर ( पी एल ) ]

जे.पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi , the 10th January, 2006

S.O. 283. Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so requires that in pursuance ofthe provisions of sub clause ( vi) of the clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour No. S.O. 2640 dated 14-7-2005 the service in Currency Note Press , Nashik Road which is covered by item 25 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 15th July , 2005.

Andwhereas , the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months .

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub - clause ( vi ) of clause ( n ) of Section 2 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposesrposes of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 15th January , 2006 .

[ F. No. S - 11017/2/2006- IR ( PL) ]

J. P. PATI , Jt. Secy .

Printed by the Manager , Govt. of India Press . Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications . Delhi - 110054.