Servants of Knowledge
Weekly Gazette of India · Government of India

This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

Published 18 March 2006

Ministry
This Gazette may contains Multiple Ministry / Organization
Department
This Gazette may contains Multiple Departments
Office
This Gazette may contains Multiple Offices
Gazetteid
NOT available ( 18117 )
Identifier
in.gazette.central.w.2006-03-18.18117
Languages
English, Hindi
Published at
Original source ↗

रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/ 2003-05

REGD . NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05

सत्यमेव जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं० 11 ] No. 11.]

नई दिल्ली, मार्च 12 मार्च 18 , 2006 , शनिवार/फाल्गुन 21-फाल्गुन 27, 1927 NEW DELHI, MARCH.12-MARCH 18, 2006 , SATURDAY/PHALGUNA 21-PHALGUNA 27, 1927 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II - खण्ड 3-उप- खण्ड ( ii) PART II-Section 3 Sub- section ( ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय (कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च, 2006

का. आ. 1000.- केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं . 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो के रिटेनर काउंसेल श्री टी. निरंजन रेड्डी, अधिवक्ता, हैदराबाद को आंध्र प्रदेश उच्चन्यायालय, हैदराबाद में दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा अन्वेषित मामलों से उद्भूत अभियोजन, अपीलों, पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[सं. 225/5 /2006- ए.वी.डी.- II.। चंद्र प्रकाश, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL , PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training) New Delhi , the 9th March , 2006

S.O. 1000. -In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal 643 GI / 2006

Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri T. Niranjan Reddy, Advocate, Hyderabad Retainer Counsel of the Central Bureau ofInvestigation in the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Hyderabad as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting the prosecution, appeals , revisions or other matters arising out of the cases investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment .

[No. 225 /5 /2006- AVD- II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्वविभाग )

कार्यालय, मुख्य आयकरआयुक्त जयपुर , 1 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1001.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1981 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उपधारा ( vi ) , आयकर नियम 1962केसह पठित नियम 2 सीए द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, जयपुर एतद्वारा " श्री आर्य विद्यापीठ सोसायटी, भुसावर ( भरतपुर ) " को निर्धारण वर्ष 2001-02 से 2003-04 (वित्त वर्ष 2000-01 से 2002-03 के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों

(2225) 2226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27, 1927

के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त धारा के निमित्त अनुमोदित करती हैं, अर्थात्:-

1. कर निर्धारिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ,

2. कर निर्धारिती उपयुर्वत कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा, 3. यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्तिके लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों, 4. कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुग्मार.अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा,

5 विघटन की स्थिति में अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धमार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी और इसका कोई भी भाग सोसायटी के किसी सदस्य को नहीं दिया जाएगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 3/06/सं. मुआआ/अ.आ. आ. ( समन्वय )/जय./ 10 (23सी )(vi )/05-06/4209]

एम.एन. वर्मा, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

(OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX)

Jaipur. the 1st March . 2006

S.O. 1001.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - clause ( vi ) of clause ( 2.3C) of Section 10 of the Income TaxAct . 1961 ( 43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA of the Income- nax Rules , 1962 , 1. the Chief Commissioner of Income -tax , Jaipur hereby approves " Shri Arya Vidyapeeth Society. Bhusawar for the purpose of the said section for the assessment years 2001-02 to 2003-04 ( F. Yrs . 2000-01 to 2002-03 ) , subject to the following conditions namely :----

1. the assessee will apply its income. or accumulate for application wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

2. the assessee will not invest or deposit its funds (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the forin ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forins or modes specified in sub-section (5) of Section 11:

[PART I -SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3. this order will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

4. the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the income- tax authority in accordance with the provisions of Income- tax Act , 1961;

5. that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organization with similar objectives and no pari ofthe same will goto any of the members ofthe Institution .

Notification No. 3 /06 /No CC /Addl. CIT ( Co -Ord . )/ JPR/ 19 (230) ( vi ) /05-06/4209 M.N. VERMA, Chief Comrussioner of Income - tax ( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिंग प्रभाग) नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1002.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड ( 9 ) के उप- खंड ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) ( क) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( च ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा श्री जे.डी. शर्मा . अध्यक्ष, इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक ऑफिसर्स एसोसिएशन को अधिसूचना जारी होने कीतारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा उनके स्थान पर किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नामित किए जाने तक अथवा उनके इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक में अधिकारी बने रहने तक, अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो, बशर्ते , वह छः वर्ष से अधिक की लगातार अवधि के लिए पद ग्रहण नहीं करेंगे, इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक के बोर्ड में अधिकारी - कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. मं. 9/49/2005 बीओ-1 ] जी.वी. सिंह, अवर सचिव (Department of Economic Affairs ) (Banking Division) New Delhi, the 9th March, 2006

S.O. 1002 .--In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( f) of sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970 read with sub- clause ( 1) and ( 2 )( a ) of clause ( 9 ) of the Natonalised Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970, the Central Government . after consultnion with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby nominates Shri J.D. Sharma , President Indian Overseas Bank Officers Association as Officer Employee Director on the Board of Directors of Indian Overseas Bank for a period ofthree years from the date of notification or until his successor is nominated or until he ceases to be an officer of Indian Overseas Bank , or until further orders whichever is carlier provided that he shall not hold office continuously for a period exceeding six years .

fr. No. 9/49/2005 - BO - 11 G. B. SINGH . Under Secy.

2227 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

उपभोक्तामामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )

भारतीयमानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 8 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1003.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/ किये गये हैं:-

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और

संशोधित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या

तिथि

संशोधन लागूहोने कीतिथि क्रम संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(3)

(4) (1)

(2)

02, फरवरी 2006

27 फरवरी, 2006 1. आइ एस 9968 ( भाग 1 ) 1988

इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : ईटी 09/ टी-3 ]

पी.के. मुखर्जी, वैज्ञा. एफ एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 8th March, 2006

S.O. 1003. -In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) ofRale 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 . the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards. particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the Indian Standards

SI . No.

No. & year of the Amendment

Date from which the Amendment shall have effect

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

27 February 2006

02. February 2006

IS 9968 ( Part 1) : 1988 Specification for Elastomer insulated cables Part 1 For working voltages upto and including 1100 Volts ( First Revision )

Copy of this Amendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9. Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg. New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi . Kolkata , Chandigarh . Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur. Nagpur, Patna. Pune . Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET 09 / T - 3 ]

P. K. MUKHERJEE , Sc . F & Head ( Electrotechnical ) 2228

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1004.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

क्रम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

संशोधन लागूहोने कीतिथि

(3)

(1)

(2)

(4)

01 मार्च, 2006

06, फरवरी 2006

1. 6303 : 1984 , शुष्क सेलों और बैटरियों के लिए सामान्य अपेक्षाएं और परीक्षण पद्धतियां ( प्रथम पुनरीक्षण )

इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १, बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः , अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: ईटी 10/टी-16 ]

पी.के. मुखर्जी, वैज्ञा. एफ एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी)

New Delhi , the 9th March , 2006

S.O. 1004.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :

SCHEDULE

SI. No. & year of the Indian Standards

No.

No.& year of the Amendment

Date from which the Amendment shall have effect

(1)

(2)

(4)

(3)

01 March, 2006

06. February 2006

1. IS 6303: 1984, General requirements and methods of tests for dry cells and batteries (First Revision)

Copy ofthis Amendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET 10/T- 16]

P. K. MUKHERJEE , Sc . F & Head (Electrotechnical ) 2229 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

नईदिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2006

का. आ. 1005.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:--

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या

क्रम संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, कीसंख्या और वर्ष

(3)

(4) (2)

(1)

आईएस 8953 : 1978

31जनवरी , 2006 1. आई एस 8953 : 2006 वात्या भ‌ट्टी के लिए 62 प्रतिशत ईंटों और ब्लॉकों की विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः , अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एम टी डी 15 /टी-12]

एस .के. गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

New Delhi , the 10th March , 2006

S.O. 1005. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicate against each:

SCHEDULE

Date of Established No.& year of the Indian Standards

Sl. No.

No. & year of Indian Standards , if any, superseded by the New Indian Standard

(2)

(3)

(4)

(1)

IS 8953 : 1978

31January, 2006 1. IS8953 : 2006-62 Percent alumina bricks and blocks for blast furnace-Specification (FirstRevision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: MTD 15 /T- 12]

S. K. GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' & Head (MTD) 2230

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) |

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2006

का. आ. 1006.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या

स्थापित तिथि संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो. कीसंख्या और वर्ष

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

30 जनवरी, 2006

आईएस 12951 : 1990

1. आई एस. 12951 : 2006 उच्च तापमान प्रयोगों के लिये अभ्रक की उष्भारोधित ईंटें-विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय नामक मनबहादुर शाह जफर नई दिल्ली काবাদ । नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर वारी जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

एस. के. गुप्ता. वैर्जाम New Delhi , the 10th March, 2006

S.O. 1006. -In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - rule ( 1) of Rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the trareas of lainen Standards Rules. 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulaesel which are given the Schedule hereto annexed has been establihsed on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

No. and Year ofthe Indian Standards Established

Date of Estabichee SI No

No. and year of indian Standards , if any, Supersededby the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

IS 12951 : 1990

30 January: 2006 IS 12951 : 2006 Mica Insulating Bricks for High Temperature Applications - Specification (First Revision )

Copy of this standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Marnak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg . New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolcatta, Chandigarlı, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad . Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur. Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[ Ref: MTD 15/ 1-16 ]

S.K. GUPTA. Scientist ' F & Head ( MTD ) 2231 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2006

का. आ. 1007.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा

संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या

वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, कीसंख्या और वर्ष

(2)

(3)

(4) (1)

आईएस 12467 ( भाग 1 ) : मार्च , 2006

1988

1. आई एस 12467 ( भाग 1 ) : 2006 वस्त्रादि सौफासाजी के फर्नीचर कीज्वलनशीलता का आकलन भाग 1 ज्वलन स्त्रोत : सुलगती सिगरेट ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

मार्च, 2006 2. आई एस 13683 2006 वस्त्रादि-रिंग स्पन कोरा सूती धागा- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

मार्च, 2006 3. आई एस 13684 2006 वस्त्रादि रोटर स्पन कोरा सूती धागा- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

मार्च , 2006 4. आई एस 15612 ( भाग 2 ): 2006 वस्त्रादि- पर्दे और ड्रेपों का ज्वलन व्यवहार भाग 2 टंगे नमूनों के बड़े प्रज्वलन स्त्रोत द्वारा ज्वाला फैलाव का मापन

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: टीएक्सडी/जी 25 ]

एम.एस. वर्मा, निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( टीएक्सडी )

New Delhi , the 10th March , 2006

S.O. 1007.-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules . 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been establihsed on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

Date of Established

No.& year of Indian

Sl. No.

Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

IS 12467 : 1988

March, 2006 1. IS 12467 ( Part 1 ) : 2006 Textiles - Assessment of the ignitability of upholstered furniture Part 1 Ignition source : Smouldering cigarette (FirstRevision)

March , 2006 2. IS 13683 Textiles-Ring Spun Grey Cotton Yarn- Specification (First Revision)

3

March, 2006 IS 13684 : 2006 Textiles-Rotor Spun Grey Cotton Yarn- Specification (FirstRevision)

March, 2006 1. IS 15612 ( Part 2) : 2006 Textiles- Burning Behaviour of Curtains and drapes Part 2 Measurement of flame spread of vertically oriented specimens with large ignition source.

Copy of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shalı Zafar Marg . New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi . Kolcatta . Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar. Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna . Pune . Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref:TXD/G-25)

M. S. VERMA , Director & Head ( Textiles ) 2232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1008.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारो द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एक्सपर्ट डिजीटल स्केल, ई-126 , जी आई डी सी इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स एस्टेट, सेक्टर-26, गांधी नगर-382 044 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ए एक्स पी-1000 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एक्सपर्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2006/82 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यषकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम से अधिक और 5000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के है, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (309 )/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2233 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2006

S.O. 1008.-Whereas the Centre ! Government, after considering the report submitted to by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service arder varied conditions ,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of "AXP - 1000 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "AXPERT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , canufactured by M/ s . Axpert Digital Scale, E- 126 , GIDC Electronics Estate , Sector - 26 , Gandhi Nagar - 382 044 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2006/82;

The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 5 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging above 50 kg . to 5000 kg. and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 (309)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 643 GI /2006-2 2234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2006

का.आ. 1009.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स टेपसन्स् साइन्टिफिक इन्स्ट्रमेंट कम्पनी , बी 2/402 , फेस- III , शान्ति पार्क , मीरा रोड़, ( ईस्ट) , ठाणे-401 107 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " तेप्ट " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " टेपसन्स्" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/804 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

TAPSON'S

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के , के है, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 267) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2235 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2006

S.O. 1009. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Modei is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrurnent (Table top type) with digital indication of "TAPT " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class-II ) and with brand name "TAPSON'S " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s. Tapson's Scientific Instrument Company , B2/402 , Phase- III, Shanti Park , Mira Road (East) , Thane-401 107 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/804:

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type). with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) indicates the weighing Tesults . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . with verification scale inverval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg. and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 (267)/2004 )

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2236

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1010.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स तपसॅन्स साइन्टिफिक इन्स्ट्रूमेंट कम्पनी , बी 2/402 , फेस- III , शान्ति पार्क, मीरा रोड , ( ईस्ट) , ठाणे -401107 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " तेप्स-10 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " तेप्सॅन्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/805 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

TAPSON'S

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारां उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे. उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा . के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 267 )/2004 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2237 [भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2006

S.O. 1010.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " TAPS - 10 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with: brand name " TAPSON'S " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Tapson's Scientific Instrument Company, B2/402 , Phase - III , Shanti Park, Mira Road (East) , Thane -401107 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/805 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 10kg and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale inverval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e' value of 100 mg . to 2g. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WIVI - 21 (267)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2238

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2006

का.आ. 1011.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माध मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप धारा ( 7 ) और उप धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स तपसॅन्स साइन्टिफिक इन्स्ट्रमेंट कम्पनी, बी 2/402, फेस- III , शान्ति पार्क , मीरा रोड , ( ईस्ट) , ठाणे -401107 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " टी ए एच पी -1000 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " तपसॅन्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/806 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

TAPSON'S

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलो ग्राम से अधिक और 5000 किलो ग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 267 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2239 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2006

S.O. 1011.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Acı, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of " TAHP- 1000 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " TAPSON'S " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Tapson's Scientific Instrument Company, B2/402 , Phase - III, Shanti Park, Mira Road (East ) , Thane-401107 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/806;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 5 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5000 kg with verification scale inverval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10% or 5 × 10% , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 267)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006 /PHALGUNA 27, 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1012.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप धारा ( 7 ) और उप धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स तपसॅन्स साइन्टिफिक इन्स्ट्रूमेंट कम्पनी, बी 2/402 , फेस- III, शान्ति पार्क, मीरा रोड ( ईस्ट ) , ठाणे -401107 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " टी ए पी पी-500 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित स्वसूचक, अस्वचालित, तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " तपसॅन्स " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/807 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

TAPSON'S

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 किलो ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है ।। प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उन्नत अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 50 किलो ग्राम से अधिक और 1000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 267 ) /2004 ]

पीः ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2241 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2006

S.O. 1012. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Modal of non - automanc weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of " TAPP - 500 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " TAPSON'S " ( hereinafter referredto as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Tapson's, Scientific Instrument Company, B2/ 402, Phase - III , Shanti Park, Mira Road ( East ) , Thane - 401107 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2005/807;

TAPSON'S

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 500Kg. and minimum capacity of 2Kg . The verification scale interval ( c ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50Kg . and up to 1000Kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 . 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (267 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 643 G1/2006-3 2242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1013, केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उका रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाल और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (महिलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल येशाना बनाएं रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त संत्रा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते दुध, असर्ग इण्डियाना ऑटोमेशन, हिंद मोटर्स के पीछे, स्टेज पीनिया इण्डस्ट्रिज एस्टेट, बंगलौर 560058 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित " आई ए- बी एफ एम" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन महित स्वचालित ग्रेविमी। क फिलिंग उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इण्डियाना " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005/ 1101 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अंकक सूचक सहित स्वचालित ग्रेविमीट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 किलो ग्राम है और 5-8 भर प्रति मिनट भरता है । इसका प्रयोग फ्री फ्लोविंग उत्पादों जैसे चाय, कॉफी, चीनी, चावल, नमक, ग्रनुअल्स, डिटर्जेन्ट, बीज, कृषि उत्पादों आदि को भरने के लिए किया जाता है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 को उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन यथार्थता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित 10 किलोग्राम से 100 किलोग्राम की रेंज की क्षमता के साथ उप्पी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 142) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2243 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2006

S.O. 1013.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Modeis ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument with digital indication of " IA - BFM " series with brand name " INDIANA" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s Indiana Automation , Behind Hind Motors , Ist Stage , Peenya Industrial Estate . Banglore- 560058, Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/ 1101 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic gravimetric filling instrument with digital indication and its maximum capacity is 100Kg . It is used for filling the free flowing products like tea , coffce , sugar . rice , salt , granuales , detergents , seeds , agricultural products etc. It fills 5-8 fills per ninute . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to scaling the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 2) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Centt Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of theid Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 10Kg to 100k manufacturedby the same manufacturer in accordance with the same priple , desigu , accuracy and with the same materials with which . the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 142 )/2005

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Меновор 2244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II--SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2006

कॉ.उ. 1014.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इण्डियाना ऑटोमेशन , हिंद मोटर्स के पीछे, 1 स्टेज, पीनिया इण्डस्ट्रिज एस्टेट, बंगलौर-560058 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित " आई ए- एल एफ एम" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित स्वचालित ग्रेविमीट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण ( द्रव फिलिंग ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इण्डियाना " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005 / 1102 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अंकक सूचक सहित स्वचालित ग्रेविमीट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण ( द्रव फिलिंग ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 किलो ग्राम है और 2-4 भरण प्रति मिनट भरता है । इसका प्रयोग फ्री फ्लोविंग उत्पादों जैसे खाद्य तेल, दूध , फल का जूस, पेस्टिसाइड, पेन्ट, केमिकल एढेसिव, आदि को भरने के लिए किया जाता है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरणं 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन यथार्थता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित 1 किलोग्राम से 50 किलोग्राम की रेंज की क्षमता के साथ उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वा तालन उपकरण भी होंगे ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 142)/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2245 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2006

S.O. 1014.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority. is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument ( Liquid Filler ) with digital indication of " IA - LFM " series, with brand name " INDIANA " (herein referredto as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Indiana Automation , Behind Hind Motors , 1st Stage, Peenya Industrial Estate. Bangalore - 560058 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/ 1102;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load celi based automatic gravimetric filling instrument ( Liquid Filler ) with digital indication and its maximum capacity is 50Kg. It is used for filling the free flowing products like edible oil, milk , fruit juice, pesticides , paints , chemical adhesive etc. It fills 2-4 fills per minute. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declarcs that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 1Kg to 50Kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design, accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

F. No. WM- 21 ( 142)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27. 1927

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली , 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1015.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इलटैक सिस्टम्स , डी 103 , महाराणा प्रताप नगर, नलॉसोपर ( ईस्ट ) जिला थाणे-401209 " एफ एल- एम एच- एक्स एक्स ( जहां एक्स एक्स- सिरिंजों की संख्या बताना है ) " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचन, स्वचालित द्रवभरण मशीन ( आयतनीय प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसका ब्रांड का नाम " इलटैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005 /766 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक स्वचालित द्रषभरण मशीन ( आयतनीय प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. या मि.लि. में समतुल्य आयतन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 0.05 ग्रा. या मि.ली में समतुल्य आयतन है । यह पिस्टन भरण के सिद्धांत पर कार्य करता है इसमें बहुभरण बिन्दु हैं और यह द्रव उत्पादों जैसे खाद्य तेल , जल, शैम्पूऔर इसी प्रकार के द्रव उत्पादों को भरने में प्रयुक्त होता है । यह 40 भरण प्रति मिनट भरता है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 0.05 ग्राम ./मि.ली. से 100 ग्राम/मि.ली . तक की रेंज में अधिकतम क्षमता बाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 63 ) / 2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2247 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/ फाल्गुम 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1015.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model . is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating, Automatic Liquid Filling machine (volumetric type ) of " FL -MH - XX" ( where XX-denotes number of syringes ) series with brand name " ELTEK" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/ s Eltek Systems , D- 103 , Maharana Pratap Nagar, Nallasopar ( East ) , Distt . Thane-401 209 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2005/766 ;

The said Model is an automatic liquid filling machine (volumetric type ) with a maximum capacity 100g or equivalent volume in ml and minimum capacity 0.05g or equivalent volume in ml . It works on the principle of piston filler have multiple filing points and used for filling of liquid products like edible oil, water, shampoo and the like . It fills40 fills per minute.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 0.05g/ ml to 100g/ml manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (63 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii)

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1016.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स काल- व्हे इंस्टमेंट्स, एल आई जी - बी-203 , ए एस राव नगर, इसीआईएल पोस्ट, हैदराबाद-500062 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " सी डकयू जे पी श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " काल- व्हे " है (जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004/457 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 25 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 500 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता हैं । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम को धारा 36 की उप धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त गौड़त के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मांडल निर्माण किया गया हैं, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान ? 10 , 210 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 67 ) /2004] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2249 [ भाग- II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February , 2006

S.O. 1016. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of " CW - JP " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - 11 ) andwith brand name " CAL - WEIGH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Cal -Weigh Instruments . LIG- B - 203 , A.S. Rao Nagar, ECIL Post , Hyderabad -500062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/2004/457:

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table ( op type ) with a maximum capacity of 6kg. and minimum capacity of 25g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 500mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar inake , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verfification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10 . where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the saine materials with which . the said approved model has bee manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (67)/20

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrolog 643 Gl /2006-4 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, MARCH 18, 2006/4 HALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2006

का.जा. 1017. - केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे गत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि नागाः, में कारण मॉडल ( नीचे हो गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और नाप मानक वीरभूमोहन निगम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बार की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल होगा अंदर विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता हेगा:

अव केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप धाग ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैमर्स এর পর एেन्न आई जी- बी 203 , ए एम राक्ष नगर, इसीआईएल पोस्ट, हैदराबाद-500062 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग यूटी बी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्त्रचालित. जेलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके बांड का है ( जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/458 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन और प्रकाशित करती है ।

१० : पक्रिन एक विकृत गंज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 from 20 अजम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत ছ। হোলে অথবা বनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 लन्ट , १० वर्क परपावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

अम्पिग लट के मद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलेने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । दो केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण -पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी त्रिनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुभवादन का निर्माण किया गया है. विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के 1950 10,000 उक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 10,2 × 10 के ग्रा धात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 67 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

New Delbi , the 28th February , 2006

S.O. 1017. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity withinthe provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act. 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is hkely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the saidAct the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the modal of non- automati weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " CW- TB " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name " CAL- WEIGH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) . manufacturedby M/s Cal -Weigh Instruments , LIG - B - 203 , A.S. Rao Nagar, ECII, Post , Hyderabad - 500062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND 09/2004/458;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table 142 with a maximum.capacity of 20kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5g . It has a tan device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machins for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg wuh verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 100ing to 2g and with verification s interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 %, or 5x10 , k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accorda the same principles , design and with the same materials with which . the said approved model has been menula

JF. No. WM-2107)

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Mcha 2252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006/ PHALGUNA 27. 1927

PART H-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

...

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1018.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त विष्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का नुमादन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अनः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप धारा ( 7 ) और उप धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैममं गाल- व्हे इंस्ट्रूमेंटस , एल आई जी- बी-203, ए एस राव नगर, इसीआईएल पोस्ट, हैदराबाद-500062 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता क ) वाले " सी डब्ल्यू- पी टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित, तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके बांड का नाम " काल- व्हे " है ( जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004/459 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान स्तराल (इ ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक आयोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।'

स्टम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलेने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 को उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह श्रोण्णा करती है कि उक्त माहल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री में, जिसमे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उर १ अभिन्त के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 50,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम अभता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 10 या 5 × 10 % , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 67)/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2253 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi, the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1018. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approva¹ of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the modal of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of " CW - PT " scries of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " CAL- WEIGH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Cal - Weigh Instruinents . LIG- B - 203 , A. S. Rao Nagar, ECIL Post , Hyderabad- 500062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2004/459;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platforin type ) with a maximum capacity of 600 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting, Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and up to 1000 kg . with verfication scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with e value of 1 × 10 . 2 × 10 . or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been inanufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 67)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 2254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) )

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1019.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एम जी इन्फोटेक, सं. 1 और 2 , विजयश्री काम्प्लेक्स, पी एल शर्मा रोड, मेरठ, उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस एम पी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सम्राट ये " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005/152 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्टज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलेने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 300 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता बाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 71 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2255 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1019.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Mode ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of " SMP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SMART WEIGH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . M.G. Infotech, No. 1 & 2 , Vijaishree Complex, P.L. Sharma Road , Meerut, Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/ 152;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with maximum capacity of 300 kg . and minimum capacity of 1kg . The value of verification scale interval ( e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 1000 kg above with verfication scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 % , or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 71 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

PART IIS , 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी, 2006

का.आ. 1020.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माए मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एम जी इन्फोटेक, सं. 1 और 2 , विजयश्री काम्प्लेक्स, पी एल शर्मा रोड, मेरठ , उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -11 ) वाले " एम एम टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सम्राट वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005 / 151 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान । ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारां ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा . से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 मि.ग्रा. से या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (71 ) /2004 |

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2257 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1020. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said inodel is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the modal of non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of " SMT " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " SMART WEIGH" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . M.G. Infotech , No. 1 & 2, Vijaishrce Complex, P.L. Sharma Road, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/ 151 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 15kg . and minimum capacity of 50g. The verification scale interval (e ) is Ig . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machinc for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10 %, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM-21 (71 )/2004 )

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 643 Gl/2006-5 2258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27, 1927

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) )

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1021.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स अधावन इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स , केजेआर काम्पलेक्स, 16 धनाप्पामुडली स्ट्रीट, मुंबई -625001 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ई एस-410 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटवे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/05/626 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विकृति गेज भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का भान 5 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.गा. से ग्राम तक के " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक वे " ई" मग के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई" यान 1 10 %, 210 या 5 × 10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 72 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2259 [ भाग- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006 फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February , 2006

S.O. 1021. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by dhe pesmicel authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatı (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "ES -410" series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - 1 ) and with brand name " ATWAY " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Adhavan Electronics . 18 , K.J.R. Complex, 16. Dhanappamudali Street , Mumbai -625001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/626 .

The said model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternate curtent power supply;

Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verfionuon scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g or with verification scale interval ( 11 ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10% , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle. design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

JF. No. WM -21 ( 72 )/2005 /

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrotoa 2260

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1022.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स अधावन इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स, # 18 केजेआर कांप्लेक्स, 16 धनाप्पामुडली स्ट्रीट, मदुराई -625001 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ई एस -510 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटवे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05/ 627 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आश्रेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 72) /2005]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2261 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1022. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating , non- automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " ES - 510 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "ATWAY " ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Adhavan Electronics , # 18, K.J.R. Complex, 16, Dhanappamudali Street, Mudurai - 625001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/627;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 200 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000 kg with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 72)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1023.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा,

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मीजान इलैक्ट्रानिक्स स्केल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड कोडीशाद, कोंडोटटी- पोस्ट मालापुरम ( जिला ) केरल-673638 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एम जेड जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मीजान " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/760 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित (टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 500 मि. ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 50,000 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 1 मि. ग्राम से 50 मिलीग्राम तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मिलीग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 135)/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2263 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1023.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " MZJ " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " MEEZAN" ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Meezan Electronic Scales Pvt . Ltd. , Kodangad, Kondotty-Post, Malappuram (Dt ), Kerala -673 638 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2005/760;

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 g and minimum capacity of 500 mg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg and with number of verification scale inverval ( n) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2× 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 135 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii))

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1024.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मीजान इलैक्ट्रानिक्स स्केल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड कोडंगाद, कोंडोटटी- पोस्ट मालापुरम ( जिला ) केरल -673638 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एम जेड टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण/मशीन ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मीजान " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2005/761 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित (टेबल टॉप प्रकार) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल.सी.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेटके मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे तक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 10,000 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 मि. ग्राम से 2 ग्राम तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 135 )/2005 ]

[ पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2265 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1024. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MZT" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and withbrand name "MEEZAN" (herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Meezan Electronic Scales Pvt. Ltd. , Kodangad, Kondotty-Post, Malappuram (Dt) , Kerala-673 638 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2005/ 761 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36. of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg and with verification scale inverval (n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g or with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 135 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 643 Gl /2006-6 2266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/FHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1025.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता जनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की -उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मीजान इलैक्ट्रानिक्स स्केल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड कोडंगाद, कोंडोटटी- पोस्ट मालापुरम ( जिला ) केरल-673638 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एम जेड पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण/मशीन ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मीज़ान " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005 /762 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विकृति गेज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 किलोग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 कि.ग्रा. से 1०,००० कि.ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि.गा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10के या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 135 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2267 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1025.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating , non -automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "MZP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " MEEZAN" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s. Meezan Electronic Scales Pvt. Ltd. , Kodangad, Kondotty- Post, Malappuram (Dt ) , Kerala-673 638 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/762;

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 200 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofthe same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5000 kg and with number of verification scale invervai (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 135 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 28 फरवरी, 2006

का.आ. 1026.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स अप्लाब लिमिटेड, अप्लाब हाउस, नं. ए/5 , वांगल इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, ठाणे-400604 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित " ईएई - एच एल " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित डिसपेंसिंग पम्प के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अप्लाब एक्सेल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 /461 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

डीजल

उक्त मॉडल एक डिसपेंसिंग पम्प का है जिसमें अंकक सूचक सहित पांच पिस्टन प्रकार के पोजिटिव डिस्पलेसमेंट मीटर लगे हैं । इसका अधिकतम प्रवाह 45 लीटर प्रति मिनट है । राशि और मात्रा के लिए इसमें पहले से सैटिंग करने की व्यवस्था है । प्रदर्श लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डिस्प्ले प्रकार का है । अधिकतम प्रवाह मात्रा 5 अंकों में तथा अधिकतम मूल्य 6 अंकों में है । न्यूनतम प्रदर्श 10 मि. लीटर है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । पम्प में एलक्ट्रो मेकेनिकल टोटलाईसर उपस्थित है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मीटरिंग यूनिट को सीलबंद और टोटेलाइज्ड किया जाएगा ताकि उन्हें कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिएखोले जाने से रोका जा सके और मॉडल में उसकी सामग्री, एक्यूरेसी, डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , वर्किंग सिद्धांत आदि के अनुसार उसमें परिवर्तन न किया जा सके ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 161 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2269 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1026.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Dispensing Pump with digital indication of "EAE - HL " series with brand name " Aplab -Excel " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Aplab Limited, Aplab House, No. A/ 5, Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane -400604 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/461 .

डीजल

0000.00

The said model is dispensing pump with digital display with five piston type positive displacement meter . The maximum flow rate is 45 Litre per minute. It has preset device for money and volume. The display is of liquid crystal display ( LCD) type . The maximum volume display is in 5 digits and price display is in 6 digits. The smallest display is 10 ml . The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply. It has an electro-mechanical totalizer.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done on the Metering unit and totalized to prevent the fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram, working principle , etc.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 161 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2270

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1027.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स अप्लाब लिमिटेड, अप्लाब हाउस, नं. ए/5 , वांगल इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, ठाणे -400604 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित " ईएई - एच एल " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित डिसपेंसिंग पम्प के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अप्लाब एक्सेल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एनं डी/09/ 2005/462 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

डीज़ल

公

उक्त मॉडल एक डिसपेंसिंग पम्प का है जिसमें अंकक सूचक सहित पांच पिस्टन प्रकार के पोजिटिव डिस्पलेसमेंट मीटर लगे हैं । इसका अधिकतम प्रवाह 45 लीटर प्रति मिनट है । राशि और मात्रा के लिए इसमें पहले से सैटिंग करने की व्यवस्था है । प्रदर्श लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डिस्प्ले प्रकार काहै । अधिकतम प्रवाह मात्रा 5 अंकों में तथा अधिकतम मूल्य 6 अंकों में है । न्यूनतम प्रदर्श 10 मि. लीटर है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । पम्प में एलक्ट्रो मेकेनिकल टोटलाईसर उपस्थित है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मीटरिंग यूनिट को सीलबंद और टोटेलाइज्ड किया जाएगा ताकि उन्हें कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोका जा सके और मॉडल में उसकी सामग्री , एक्यूरेसी, डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , वर्किंग सिद्धांत आदि के अनुसार उसमें परिवर्तन न किया जा सके ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 161 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2271 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1027. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model Dispensing Pump with digital indication of " EAE -HL " series with brand name " Aplab - Excel" (herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Aplab Limited, Aplab House , No. A/ 5 , Wagle Industrial Estate , Thane -400604 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/462;

डीज़ल

The said model is a dispensing pump with digital display with five piston type positive displacement meter. The maximum flow rate is 90 Litre per minute . It has preset device for money and volume . The display is of liquid crystal display ( LCD) type . The maximum volume display is in 5digits and price display is in 6 digits . The smallest display is 10 ml . The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply. It flas an electro- mechanical totalizer.

Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done on the Metering unit and totalized to prevent the fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuitdiagram, working principle etc.

[F. No. WM- 21 (161 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2272

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1028.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स किरी स्केल्स, 14/1 , न्यू वेस्ट स्ट्रीट, अव्वई नगर, चुलाईमेडु , चेन्नई -600094 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एन एच आर " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित इलैक्ट्रॉनिक तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नेल्को" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 / 810 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है। उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SELCO

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन अन्तराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 222 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2273 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1028. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of "NHR " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "NELCO " ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Kiri Scales, 14/1 , New West Street, Avvai Nagar , Choolai Medu . Chennai -600-094 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2005/810;

The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 40 g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg. and with number of verification scale inverval (n) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for " e " value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10* or 5× 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 (222 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 643 GI /2006-7 2274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी, 2006

का.आ. 1029.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स किरी स्केल्स, 14/1 , न्यूवेस्ट स्ट्रीट, अव्वई नगर, चुलाईमेडु, चेन्नई -600 094 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एन सी टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म के लिए कन्वर्शन किट ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नेल्को " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005 / 811 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल. ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेट फार्म के लिए कन्वर्शन किट) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उन्नत अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 'जो 50 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन अन्तराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शुन्य केसमतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 222)/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2275 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1029.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (conversion kit for platform) with " NCT " series belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) and with brand name " NELCO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Kiri Scales , 14/1 , New West Street, Avvai Nagar, Choolai Medu, Chennai -600 094 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/811 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (conversion kit for platform) with a maximum capacity of 300 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 1000 kg with number of verification scale inverval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 50g or more and with " e" value 1×10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (222)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1030.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जॉनसन इंडिया, प्लाट सं. 51,52 , न्यूअहमदाबाद इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, स्टील टाउन के सामने , सरखेज- बावल रोड, गांव-मोरय्या, तालुका-सनन्द, जिला अहमदाबाद, गुजरात द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जॉनसन " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचम सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रीज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जॉनसन" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/ 597 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( वे ब्रीज प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमतः 100 कि. ग्रा. है सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 176) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2277 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1030. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge type ) with digital indication of " Jonson " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Jonson " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Jonson India, Plot No. 51 , 52 , New Amdavad Industrial Estate , Opposite Steel Town , Sarkhej -Baval Road , Village - Moraiya Taluka- Sanand, District- Ahmedabad, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2005/597;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic Weighing instrument ( Weighbridge type) with a maximum capacity of 40 tonne and minimum capacity 100kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 5 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 176)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1031.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जॉनसन इंडिया, प्लाट सं. 51,52 , न्यूअहमदाबाद इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, स्टील टाउन के सामने, साखेजबवला रोड ग्राम - मोराटया, तालुका- सनन्द जिला अहमदाबाद गुजरात द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जॉनसन " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (वे ब्रीज के लिए कनवर्सन किट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जॉनसन " है ( जिसे उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005/598 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

90

उक्त भॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज के लिए कनवर्शन किट प्रकार का है । ) इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आघेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज़ प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10%, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 176) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2279 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/ फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1031.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit for Weighbridge ) with digital indication of " Jonson " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Jonson " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s. Jonson India, Plot No. 51 , 52, New Amdavad Industrial Estate , Opposite Steel Town , Sarkhej -Baval Road. Village- Moraiya Taluka- Sanand, District -Ahmedabad, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/2005 /598 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kit for Weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 176)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ії)]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी, 2006

का.आ. 1032.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ग्राम टॉन सिस्टम, सं. 1-2/46/4 सी, बस डिपो के निकट, एन एच-7, निर्मल-504 106, आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जी टी एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इक्वल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005/ 844 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है,

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणान उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल . निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 197 ) /2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2281 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1032. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60. of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GTS " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class- III) and with brand name " EQUAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Gram Ton System, No. 1-2-46/4C , Near Bus Depot , NH- 7 , Nirmal- 504 106 , A.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005 /844:

6000

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top Typc) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity 100g . The verification scale interval ( c ) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' c ' value of 100mg. to 2g with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for " e " value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 . 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , where k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 197 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 643 G1 /2006-8 2282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1033.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ग्राम टॉन सिस्टम, सं . 1-2/46/4 सी, बस डिपो के निकट, एन एच -7, निर्मल-504106 , आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जी टी एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इक्वल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/ 845 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गैज प्रकार का भार लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आघेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10के या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 197) /2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2283 भारत का राजपत्र मार्च18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th February , 2006

S.O. 1033 -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating non - automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GTS " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " EQUAL " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Gram Ton System, No. 1-2-46/4C, Near Bus Depot, NH - 7 , Nirmal -504 106, A.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/845 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below) ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity 4 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200 g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for ' fraudulent practices

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , where k the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufacrured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 197)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2284

THE CETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 200G / PHALGUNA 27. 1927

[PART II- Sh .3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी, 2006

का.31. 1034.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीग सहारा आधनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वाहन नं. 1-2 /46/ गीसी ने किट, एनएच -7 , निर्मल -504106, आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता एक पावसा से दुख के अभक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इक्वल" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मांडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2005/ 846 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

Years Experience 30

GTS- 78 SER

उक्तमॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावतीं धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि. ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10% या 5 × 10*, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 197 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2285 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1034. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (weigh bridge type ) with digital indication of belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of "GTS " Series with brand name " EQUAL" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Gram Ton System , No. 1-2-46/ 4C , Near Bus Depot , NH - 7 , Nirmal - 504106 , Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005 /846;

Years Experience 30

GTS- 78 SER

The said Model is a non - automatic weighing instrument (weigh bridge type ) with a maximum capacity of40 tonnes and minimum capacity of 200kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply. The load cell is of strain gauge type .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 % , or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactrured by the same manufaacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 197 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1035.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एम्को इक्यूपमेंट, नं. 1 - बी/6 ए, सिधाना मार्केट, फव्वारा सिंह चौक, फरीदाबाद-121001 , हरियाणा द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ए पी सी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसका ब्रांड का नाम " एम्को " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2006/ 88 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वाचालित (टेबल टॉप प्रकार) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिंणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता, डिजाइन, सर्किट, डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 228 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2287 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1035. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) of series " APC " and with brand name " AMCO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Amco Equipments , No. 1 -B/6A, Sidhana Market , Phawara Singh Chowk, Faridabad- 121001 , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2006/88;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity 100g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and Model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg . to 50 mg. and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactrured by the same manufaacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 228 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1036.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एम्को इक्यूपमेंट, नं. 1 - बी/6 ए, सिधाना मार्केट, फव्वारा सिंह चौक, फरीदाबाद-121001 , हरियाणा द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ए ई टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम्को " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2006 /89 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

ARCO

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेंबल टाप प्रकार तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकंलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता हैं ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट , डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल सहित से 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 228 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2289 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

6.O. 1036. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " AET " and with brand name " AMCO" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Amco Equipments, No. 1 -B/6À, Sidhana Market , Phawara Singh Chowk, Faridabad- 121001 , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2006/89;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 g . and minimum capacity 200mg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms to terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram, working principle etc.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img. to 50mg . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k, ог 5× 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 228 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 643 GI/2006-9 2290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नईदिल्ली, 28 फरवरी, 2006

का.आ. 1037.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एम्को इक्यूपमेंट, नं. 1- बी/6 ए, सिधाना मार्केट, फव्वारा सिंह, चौक, फरीदाबाद-121001 , हरियाणा द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ए ई पी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम्को" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2006 /90 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आघेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता, डिजाइन, सर्किट, डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 10% , 2 × 10% या 5 × 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 228 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2291 [ भाग II- कष्ठ 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1037. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures(Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platfrom type) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " AEP " and with brand name " AMCO" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Amco Equipments , No. I -B/6A, Sidhana Market, Phawara Singh Chowk, Faridabad- 121001 , Haryana and which is assigned the approval. mark IND/0920/2006/90;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platfrom type) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 5 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and Model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg. and upto 5000 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with 'e' value of I × 10%, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k, where k, is a positive or negative whole number or equai to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approvedModel has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 2I ( 228 ) /2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1038.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एभ्को इक्यूपमेंट, नं. 1 बी/6 ए, सिधाना मार्केट , फव्वारा सिंह चौक, फरीदाबाद-121001 , हरियाणा द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए ई डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्हे ब्रिज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम्को " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2006/ 91 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

AMCO

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वाचालित ( व्हे ब्रिज प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50- टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता, डिजाइन , सर्किट , डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अंनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो जो 5 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल सहित 5 टन से 150 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के है , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 228 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए . कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2293 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1038. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instruinent ( Weighbridge type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "AEW" and with brand name " AMCO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , imanufactured by M/ s . Amco Equipments , No. 1 -B/6A, Sidhana Market, Phawara Singh Chowk, Faridabad- 121001 , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /06/ 91 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge type) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity 100 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 5 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 150 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 228 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1039.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एन ०डी० जैन एन्टरप्राइजेज, गाँव नसीरपुर, हिसार रोड , अंबाला सीटी-134002 , हरियाणा द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले एनालॉग सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मेकेनिकल प्लेटफार्म मशीन-प्रो वेट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " भारत " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/ 36 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक मकैनिकल प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मैकेनिकल प्लेटफार्म मशीन प्रो वेट प्रकार है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 किलो ग्राम है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 किलो ग्रा० है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्राम है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम से अधिक और 1000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 325 ) /2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2295 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1039. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical Platform Machine - Pro - Weight Type ) with analogue indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " BHARAT " manufactured by M/s N.D. Jain Enterprises , Village Nasirpur, Hissar Road, Ambala City - 134002, Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /06 /36;

The said model is a mechanical type lever based non - automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical Platform machine- pro-weight type) with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and up to 1000 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k, or 5× 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufacrured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (325 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2296

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1040.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सात्विक स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, संख्या-10, चमचम इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, आजाद नगर के पास , भण्डार ( पू० ) , ठाणे, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " सैट - बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( बेबी वेईंग मशीन ) के मॉडल का जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सात्विक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2005 / 1043 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( बेबी वेईंग मशीन प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण हैं । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता, डिजाइन , सर्किट रूपरेखा, कार्यकारी सिद्धांत आदि के आधार पर बदला नहीं जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2×10 * या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 325 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2297 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1040. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the modeis described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rüles , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now. therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of, non - automatic weighing instrument (Baby Weighing Machine ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of ' SAT - B ' series with brand name " SATVIK " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Satvik Scale Industries , No. 10 , Chamcham Industrial Estate . Near Azad Nagar, Bhandar ( E ) , Thane , Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/05/1043:

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Baby Weighing Machine) . Its maximum capacity is 20kg and minimum capacity 200g . The value of verification scale interval (c ) is 10g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram . working principle etc.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 235 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 643 GI/2006-10 2298

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी, 2006

का.आ. 1041.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सात्विक स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, संख्या -10, चमचम इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट , आजाद नगर के पास, भण्डार ( पू. ) , ठाणे, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -111 ) वाले " ए सी ओ एन" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( सिक्के द्वारा संचालित व्यक्ति तोल मशीनें ) के मॉडल का जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सात्विक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005/ 1044 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( सिक्के द्वारा संचालित व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50ग्राम है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता, डिजाइन, सर्किट रूपरेखा , कार्यकारी सिद्धांत आदि के आधार पर बदला नहीं जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 को उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10के या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 235 ) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2299 [ भाग II- खण्ड -3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1041. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Ruics , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore . in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non -automatic weighing instrument (Coinoperated Person Weighing Machine ) with digital indication of " SCON " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SATVIK " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Satvik Scale Industries . No. 10. Chamcham Industrial Estate . Near Azad Nagar, Bhandar ( E ) . Thane , Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2005/ 1044 :

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell non - automatic weighing instrument ( Coin operated Person Weighing Machine ) with a maximum capacity of 200kg and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 50g.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 100kg . and up to 200 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 235 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 2300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27. 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1042.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित्त प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सात्विक स्कल इंडस्ट्रील, माथा 10, चमचम इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, आजाद नगर के पास, भण्डार ( पू. ) , ठाणे , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एस ए टी पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( पर्सन वेईंग मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सात्विक" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05 /1045 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( पर्सन वेईंग मशीन ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्राम है । BATHROOM SCALE

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट रूपरेखा, कार्यकारी सिद्धांत आदि के आधार पर बदला नहीं जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 10 , 210 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 235) /2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2301 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O.1042 . Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Person Weighing Machine ) with digital indication of " SATP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SATVIK" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Satvik Scale Industries , No. 10, Chamcham Industrial Estate , Near Azad Nagar, Bhandar (E), Thane, Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /05/1045;

BATHROOM SCALE

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell non - automatic weighing instrument (Person Weighing Machine) with a maximum capacity of 300kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material, accuracy, design, circuit diagram, working principle etc :

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 100kg. and up to 1000 kg. with verfication scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10* or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 235)/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 जनवरी, 2006

का.आ. 1043.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सात्विक स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, संख्या -10 , चमचम इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, आजाद नगर के पास, भण्डार ( पू. ) , ठाणे , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस एनी सी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सात्विक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005 / 1046 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित (क्रेन प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्ज क डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता, डिजाइन, सर्किट रूपरेखा, कार्यकारी सिद्धांत आदि के आधार पर बदला नहीं जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिकके " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तः की रेंज में सत्यापन अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 235 )/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2303 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1043. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Crane type) with digital indication of " SATC " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SATVIK" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Satvik Scale Industries , No. 10 , Chamcham Industrial Estate , Near Azad Nagar, Bhandar (E ) , Thane , Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/1046;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Crane type ) with a maximum capacity of 2000kg. and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000 kg. with verfication scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (235)/2005]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1044.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बोट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रॉयल स्केल कम्पनी, लाडवा रोड, नई अनाज मण्डी के पास, पिपली, कुरूक्षेत्र , हरियाणा द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले एनालॉग सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मैकेनिकल प्लेटफार्म मशीन- प्रो वेट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "जीत " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2006/34 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक मैकेनिकल प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मैकेनिकल प्लेटफार्म मशीन- प्रो वेट प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्राम है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू एम -21 (329 )/2005]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2305 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1044. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical Platform Machine -Pro - Weight Type ) with analogue indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) and with brand name " JEET " manufactured by M/ s Royal Scale Co. , Ladwa Road, Near New Anaj Mandi , Pipli , Kurukshetra , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark 1ND /09/ 06/ 34 ;

The said Model is a mechanical type lever based non - automatic weighing instrument (mechanical platform machine-pro -weight type ) with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg. and up to 1000kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 329 )/2005 ]

P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 643GI/2006-11 2306

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1045.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा ठसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( मीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स शक्ति व्हे टैक, नं . 22 , एस एन हाई स्कूल, स्कैफर स्कूल के सामने, तिरुनेलवेली -627001 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस-225 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मैक्सीम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05/ 785 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधरित ( वे ब्रिज प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60,000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 150 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2×10* या 5 × 10%, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू.एम -21 ( 289)/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2307 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुम 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1945, Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument ( Weigh bridge type) with digital indication of " S -225 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) andwith brand name " MAXIM " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Sakthi Weigh Tech. No. 22 , S.N , High School , Opposite Scaffter School , Tirunelveli -627 001 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/05/785;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instruinent ( Weighbridge type) with a maximum capacity of 60,000kg and minimum capacity of 200kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 150 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5kg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2× 10kor 5 × 10k , where k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (289)/2004]

P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1046.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स शक्ति व्हे टैक, नं. 22 , एस एन हाई स्कूल, स्कैफर स्कूल के सामने, तिरुनेलवेली-627001 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड कानाम " मॅक्सीम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/05 / 305 समनुदेशित किया गया है. अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 200 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होगें जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10के या 5 × 10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 289) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2309

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/ फाल्गुनদ 27 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1046.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of " SP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " MAXIM" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s. Sakthi Weigh Tech , No. 22, S.N. High School , Opposite Scaffter School , Tirunelveli -627 001 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/305;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load ceil based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg. and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - Section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg. and up to 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5 g. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (289)/2004]

P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SBC, 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2006

का.आ. 1047.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में पर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और नाप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और भाप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शक्ति वे टैंक, भ. 22 , एस एन हाई स्कूल , स्काटर स्कूल के सामने तिरुममेली -627001 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अध्यचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मैक्सिम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09/ 2005 / 304 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मांडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमत्ता 30 कि. ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 प्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलमात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल ब्रिनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्राम से 2 ग्राम तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमन अंतराल सहित 50 कि. प्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 289 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2311 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 28th February, 2006

S.O. 1047. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see-the figure given below) is in conformitywith the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the modal of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of " ST" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " MAXIM" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Sakthi Weigh Tech, No. 22, S.N. High School , Opposite Scaffter School, Tirunelveli -627001 , Tamil Nadu and which is aesigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/304.

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Centrai Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shali also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 of 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2g and with verficiation scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 289 )/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 2312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 8 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1048.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1696 , तारीख 12-06-2003, सं. का.आ. 2059, 2060 व 2061 तारीख 22-07-2003, सं . का. आ. 2381 व 2382, तारीख 12-8-2003 , सं. का. आ. 2461 , तारीख 19-8-2003, सं. का.आ. 694 ( अ ) , तारीख 14-6-2004, सं. का.आ. 740 ( अ ) , तारीख 25-6-2004 एवं सं. का. आ. 858 ( अ) , तारीख 29-7-2004 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया) लिमिटेड द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में दहेज - हजीरा - उरान- धाबोल पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थीं;

और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 20-9-2003 से 21-11-2003 एवं 16-6-2004 से 16-8-2004 एवं 12-8-2004 से 12-9-2004 एवं 1-7-2004 से 1-12-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात करदिया गया है;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि ठक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाइनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

अनुसूची

जिला तहसील गाँव सर्वे नं . आर ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल ( हैक्टेयर में )

5 1

3

4

2

रायगड

00-19-00 पनवेल वाकडी नितलस

146 245

00-23-00

247/0

00-31-00

248/2

00-35-00

250/0

00-31-00

252/0

257/0

258/0

259/0

00-13-00

261/0

14/0

मोहो

16/1

00-14-00

16/2

00-37-00

19/4ए 19/46 19/4 }

25/2

00-22-00

25/3ए, बी

25/4

00-17-00

42/0

00-12-00

59/1

00-12-00

59/4

00-14-00

00-14-00

59/5

64/4

00-12-00

64/3

76/2

00-16-00

77/1

00-15-00

72/2

77/4

77/5

85/1

00-28-00 चिंध्रण 26/4

00-21-00

26/3

00-31-00

26/6

00-17-00

30/2

00-27-00 ठाणे अंबरनाथ आंभे 70/एपी

17/3पी

74पी

00-15-00

3/4/2पी

3/4/1पी

79/3/पी 00-15-00

26/2पी

00-22-00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

5

3

4

1 1

2

ठाणे ठाणे

79/2पी

अंबरनाथ आंभे

16/6पी

00-14-00

19/1पी 00-14-00

80/6पी

23/2

साखरोली

21/0

00-17-00

25/0

00-36-00

23/1

27/0

00-17-00

29/0

00-77-00

32/4

00-16-00

30/1 :

00-13-00

कुशीवली 80/2

103

68

00-56-00

79/1

81/3

00-53-00

00-29-00

91/1 }

00-26-00

93/1

00-16-00

90/1पी

90/2

00-13-00

90/4

87/1

00-16-00

87/2

86/5

00-22-00

86/6

86/3

00-12-00

86/1

85/2

00-35-00

85/1

00-13-00

80/3

00-13-00

81/4

00-23-00

वाडी 22/1 पी

23पी

00-33-00

193पी

18/3पी

00-31-00

194पी

00-15-00

00-26-00

197पी

25पी

26पी

21/1 पी

00-45-00

19पी

21/4पी

643 GI /2006-12

2313

4

5

2

3

54पी

अंबरनाथ चिखलोली

00-27-00

32/3पी

00-26-00

32/2पी

00-27-00

32/1 पी

00-15-00

1/1पी

162पी

163/3पी 0000.0

00-32-00

163/1पी

163/2पी 00-04-00

00-42-00

157पी

147पी

142/8पी

142/7पी

टी. लाइन

140पो

00-23-00

130पी

52पी

00-72-00

92

कल्याण रायते

93

80/5

80/6

53/0

00-17-00

99पी

00-24-00 टिटवाला 43

00-43-000 रूंदे 87

घोटसई 28

56

00-47-00 म्हसकल 134/0

आप्टी तर्फे78/3पी

चोण्

66

00-15-00

82

जांभुल 58

मोहीली

15/5पी

चिंचवली

17/7

54

बसत

सेलवली

भिवंडी आन्हे 2बी

59

00-29-00

37/44

बोरीवली

38/9

00-13-40

00-15-00

140/1

किरवली-

दुरवली

140/2.

00-22-00

140/3

00-11-00

140/4

126/3

126/4

102/2

00-27-00

133 2314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

4

2

3

5

1 1

ठाणे भिवंडी पडघा 24पी

ठाणे

जांभिवली 60

44/5

71

37/1

37/2

00-25-00

37/3

29

00-15-00

दिघाशी 182/0

173/2

173/3 .

173/4

173/5

00-12-00

173/7

173/8

173/9

173/10

77/1

77/2

00-17-00

77/3

77/4

77/5

85/8

85/9

00-16-00

85/10

00-16-00

85/11

00-15-00

85/12

00-12-00

2/1

2/2

00-12-00

2/3

2/4

00-16-00

00-14-00

2/5ए

158/2

158/3

158/6

00-11-00

158/10

00-15-00

160/1

203/0

39/15

39/16

39/21

00-23-00

39/19

00-13-00

39/20

39/22

117/1

00-36-00

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) }

4

2

3

5

दिघाशी 117/2

भिंठंडी

00-15-00

117/3ए

117/3बी

117/3सी 00-13-00

117/3डी 00-16-00

117/3ई

124/1

00-36-00

00-65-00

124/2एम

2ए+5बी

124/9

00-36-00 खरीवली 320

00-81-00

323

00-41-00

324

00-27-00

3

00-11-00

290

00-28-00

325

213

328

00-37-00

288

00-13-00

287

00-28-00

286

269

265

263

00-37-00

264

00-25-00

56

00-36-00

57

00-16-00

76

00-36-00

75

78

00-71-00

79

91

267

90

00-16-00

266

00-62-00

89

117

00-75-00

115

116

144

00-22-00

147

00-22-00

145

00-23-00

142

00-43-00

137

00-63-00

268

00-64-00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2315

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

1

3

4

1 2

5

ढाणे

39

02-65-00

ठाणे विक्रमगड धानेडे

00-95-00

चिंचघर 87

00-71-00

90

00-26-00

91

00-12-00

आपटी 53

बुद्रुक

51

46

00-14-00

45

00-16-00

43

00-13-00

42

00-41-00

41

00-21-00

40

39

00-67-00

30

29

00-36-00

27

26

24

00-15-50

23

25

6

00-23-00

73

74

5

4

75

90

00-27-00

89

00-33-00

91

00-15-00

70

93

95

94

00-26-00

96

00-18-00

99

00-41-00

00-39-00

106

00-28-00

102

103

128

00-43-00

127

00-33-00

00-62-00

124

201

00-18-00

कुझे

199

00-32-00

200

194

00-32-00

191

5

4

2

3

00-14-00

220

विक्रमगड कुझे

00-35-00

279

00-35-00

278

00-38-00

377

00-24-00

326

448

00-54-00

00-59-00

447

00-27-00

533

532

33

00-41-00 बाघण

डहाणू

35

36

1

01-79-00

2

3

00-31-00

7

00-68-00 हलदपाडा 28

29

31

32

40

00-21-00 खानिव 68

55

01-39-00

2

48

81

00-61-00

63

00-73-00

37

38

66

40

22

00-59-00

21

00-13-00

66

00-65-00

90

00-69-00 तोरणी 13

00-63-00

15

00-17-00

14

00-45-00

16

17

1

00-38-00

8

9

10

7

[फा. सं. एल-14014/23/05/जी.पी. ( भाग -1 ) ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव 2316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS New Delhi , the 8th March , 2006

S.O. 1048. Whereasby notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1696dated 12-6-2003 , No. S.O. 2059 2060 and 2061 dated 22-7-2003 , No. S.O. 2381 and 2382 dated 12-8-2003、2461 dated 19-08-2003 , No. S.O. 694 ( E) dated 14-6-2004 . No. S.O. 740 (E) dated 25-6-2004 and No. S.O. 858 ( E ) dated 29-7-2004 issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of natural gas through Dahej -Hazira - Uran Dhabol Pipeline Project in the State ofMaharashtra . a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited.

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notifications were made available to the public from 20-9-2003 to 21-11-2003 and 16-6-2004 to 16-8-2004 and 12-8-2004 το 12-9-2004 and 01-07-2004 to 01-12-2004;

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the competent authority:

And whereas the competent authority has . under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government :

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline . has decided to acquire the right of user therein:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeime .

And. further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on the date of the publication of the declaration , in the GAIL ( India) Limited. proposing to lay the pipeline and thereupon the right of such user in the land shall . subjectto the terms and conditions so imposed , vest in the GAIL ( India) Limited . free from all encumbrances .

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil

District

Village Survey No.

Area to be acquired for ROU (In Hectare)

4

1

2

3

5

Vakadi

Panvel

146

00-19-00 Raigad

00-23-00

Nitalas 245

247/0 00-31-00

248/2 00-35-00

250/0 00-31-00

252/0 00-05-00

257/0 00-20-00

258/0 00-03-00

259/0 00-30-00

00-13-00

261/0

14/0

Moho

16/1

00-14-00

16/2

19/4A

19/4B 00-37-00

19/4D

25/2

00-22-00

25/3A, B

25/4

00-17-00

42/0

00-12-00

59/1

00-12-00

59/4

00-14-00

59/5

00-14-00

64/4

00-12-00

64/3

76/2

00-16-00

00-15-00

77/1

77/2

77/4

77/5

85/1

00-28-00

Chindran 26/4

00-21-00

26/3

00-31-00

26/6

30/2

00-17-00 Thana

00-27-00

Ambhe 70/ AP

Amber- nath

17/3P

74/3P 00-15-00

3/4/2P 00-03-00

3/4/ 1P 00-01-00

79 /3P 00-15-00

26/2P 00-22-00

79/2P 00-10-00 2317 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

4

4

5 3

5

1

2

3

1

2

00-14-00

Ambhe 16/6P

Thana Amber-

Chikhaloli 54P

Amber-

Thana

00-14-00

19/1P

32/3P 00-27-00

nath

80/6P

32/2P 00-26-00 23/2

Sakharoli

32/ 1P 00-27-00

00-17-00

21/0

1/1P 00-15-00 25/0

162P 00-02-00 23/1 00-36-00

163/3P 00-03-00 27/0 00-17:00

29/0 00-17-00

163/ 1P 00-32-00 32/4 00-16-00

00-04-00

163/2P

30/1

157P 00-42-00 80/2 00-13-00

Kushivali

147P 00-10-00 103

142/8P 00-02-00 68

00-07-00

142/7P

00-56-00

79/1

T. Line 00-08-00 81/3 00-53-00

140P 00-23-00

00-28-00

91/1

130P 00-10-00

}

91/2

52P

00-72-00

00-26-00

93/1

92

Kalyan Rayate

00-16-00

90/ 1P

93

00-13-00

90/2 .

80/5

90/4

00-06-00

80/6

00-16-00

87/1

87/2

53/0

86/5 00-22-00

00-17-00

99P

86/6 00-10-00

Titwala 43

00-24-00 86/3

00-12-00

00-43-00

Runde 87

86/1

Ghotsai 28

85/2 00-35-00

56

00-47-00 85/1

00-13-00

134/0

Mhaskal

80/3

00-13-00

78/3P

Apti

81/4

00-23-00

(Choun)

Wadi 22/ 1P

66

23P

82

00-15-00 193/P 00-33-00

Jambhul 58

18/3P 00-31-00

Moholi

194P 00-15-00

15/5P

Chincha-

197P 00-26-00

wali

25P

177

26P

Vasant 54

21/ 1P 00-45-00

Shelavali

19P

Bhiwandi Anhe 2B

21/4P 00-20-00

59 2318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

2

3

4.

1

1 Thana

37/14

Bhiwandi Borivali

00-29-00

Thana

38/9 00-13-00

00-15-00

Kirawali 140/1

140/2 00-07-00

140/3 00-22-00

140/4 00-11-00

126/3 00-07-00

126/4 00-03-00

102/2 00-27-00.

133

Padghe 24P

Jambhivali 60

44/5

71

37/1

37/2

37/3

00-25-00

29

00-15-00

Dighashi 182/0

173/2

173/3

173/4 00-04-00

173/5 00-12-00

173/7 00-01-00

173/8 00-01-00

173/9 00-01-00

173/10 00-02-00

77/1

77/2 00-17-00

77/3

77/4

77/5

85/8

85/9

00-16-00

85/10 00-16-00

85/11 00-15-00

85/12 00-12-00

2/1

2/2

00-12-00

2/3

2/4

00-16-00

2/5A 00-14-00

00-02-00

158/2

158/3

158/6 00-10-00

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

2

4

5

00-11-00 Bhiwandi Dighashi 158/10

160/1 00-15-00

203/0 00-04-00

39/15 00-01-00

39/16 00-05-00

39/21 00-23-00

39/19 00-13-00

39/20 00-06-00

39/22 00-03-00

117/1 00-36-00

117/2

117/3A 00-15-00

117/3B 00-02-00

117/3C 00-13-00

117/3D 00-16-00

117/3E 00-02-00

124/1 00-36-00

124/2M 00-65-00

2A+5B

124/9 00-36-00 Wada Kharivali 320

00-81-00

323

00-41-00

324

00-27-00

3

00-11-00

290

00-28-00

325

213

328

00-37-00

288

00-13-00

287

286

00-28-00

269

265

263

00-37-00

264

00-25-00

56

00-36-00

57

00-16-00

76

00-36-00

75

78

00-71-00

79

91

267

90

00-16-00

266

00-62-00 2319 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

4

4

5

3

2

3

5

1

1

2

Thana

00-26-00

94

Thana Wada Kharivali 89

Vikram- Apti

96

00-18-00

Budruk

ghad

00-75-00

117

99

00-41-00 115

00-39-00

106

116

00-28-00

102

144

00-22-00

103

00-43-00

128

00-22-00

147

00-33-00

127

00-23-00

145

00-62-00

124

142

00-43-00

00-18-00

Kurze 201

00-63-00

137

199

00-32-00

00-64-00

268

200

194 00-02-00

02-65-00

Thana

Ghanede 39

Vikram-

00-32-00

191

ghad

220

00-14-00

00-95-00

Chinch- 87

00-35-00

279

ghar

00-35-00

278

90

00-71-00

00-38-00

377

91

00-26-00

326

00-24-00

448

00-54-00 53

00-12-00

Apti

447

00-59-00 Budruk

00-27-00

533

51

532

46

00-14-00

00-41-00

Dahanu Bandhan 33

45

00-16-00

35

36

43

00-13-00

01-79-00

1

42

2

41

00-41-00

00-31-00

3

40

00-21-00

7

00-68-00 39

Haladpada28

29

30

00-67-00

31

29

32

27

00-36-00

40

26

00-21-00

Khaniv 68

24

00-15-00

01-39-00

55

2

23

48

25

81

00-61-00 6

00-23-00

63

00-73-00 73

37

74

38

66

01-02-00 5

40

4

00-59-00

22

75

21

00-13-00 90

66

00-65-00 89

00-27-00

00-69-00

90

00-33-00

91

Torani 13

00-63-00 70

00-15-00

15

00-17-00 93

14

00-45-00 95

16 2320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

1

2

3

4

5 Thana

17

Dahanu Torani

1

00-38-00

8

9

10

7

[F. No. L- 14014/23/2005 -G.P. (Pt -1) ] S.B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 8 मार्च, 2006

का. आ. 1049. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 417 ( अ) , तारीख , 29 मार्च, 2004 और सं. का.आ. 1349( अ) , तारीख 9 दिसम्बर, 2004 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में दहेज- हजीरा - उरान एवं सपर पाइपलाइनों के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 18-5-2004 एवं 19-2-2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;

और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया है;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइनें विछाने के लिएअपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन कीतारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाइनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल (इण्डिया) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

जिला तहसील गाँव सर्वे नं. आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करनेकेलिए क्षेत्र (हैक्टे. में)

4

1

2

3

5 चोर्यासी

00-05-66

नाला

सूरत

खजोद

51/70

51/71

00-51-55

63/93

63/94

00-15-18

63/95

56/80

00-54-53

57/81-अ

00-37-33

57/81 -ब }

44/38

00-39-43

कैनाल

00-04-92

00-29-84

32/43 32/44 }

31/36 31/37

31/38

00-37-20

31/39

30/35-अ 30/35-ब 00-29-03

24/26

00-18-41

00-00-22

25/32-अ 25/32-ब }

25/31 25/30

00-13-81

23/30 23/27 23/25 }

20/23

00-04-06

15/19-अ 00-71-23

17/20 रास्ता

00-01-46

00-05-90

00-12-15

12/17-अ 12/17-ब }

00-62-92

111/अ- 1- 177

00-07-53

कारट्रेक 135/210-ब 00-64-49

140/213 00-24-17

133/211 -अ 133/211 -

ब00-46-35

'}

00-71-70

131/207-अ 131/207-ब

130/206 00-03-13

111/अ- 1-177 00-77-63

नाला

00-06-41

07-96-24

कुल [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2321

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

1

2

3

4

5

00-18-85 चोर्यासी मगदल्ला 42/2

सूरत

42/1

42/1

00-06-56

42/25

43/2- पैकी

43/1-पैकी

}

43/3

00-31-40

43/4

43/5

44/1-पैकी

44/1

00-40-79

44/2

'}

44/3

45

00-16-58

36

00-01-47

38/1

38/2

00-42-09

38/3

}

37

00-23-88

22

00-44-26

34/1

34/1-पैकी 00-53-19

34/2

}

33

33/1-पैकी

33/1/पैकी

33/2-पैकी 00-08-85

33/4

33/5

77/1

77/2

00-21-44

77/3

78

00-89-31

79

00-22-52

04-21-19

कुल

[फा. सं. एल.-14014/ 23 / 2005 जी. पी. ( भाग-1 ) ] एस. बी. मण्डल , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th March , 2006

S.O 1049.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 417 (E ) , dated the 29th March, 643 GI /2006-13

2004 and No. S.O. 1349 ( E ) , dated 9th December, 2004 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines for the transportotion of natural gas through Dahej - Hazir-Uran and spur pipelines in the State of Gujarat by the GAIL (India) Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on 18-5-2004 and 19-2-2005;

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the competent authority:

And whereas the competent authority has . under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted its report to the Central Government:

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline. has decided to acquire the right of user therein:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest , on the date of the publication of the declaration , in the GAIL ( India ) Limited, proposing to lay the pipeline and thereupon the right of such user in the land shall , subject to the ternis and conditions so imposed , vest in the GAIL ( India ) Limited. free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

District Tehsil

Survey

Village

No.

Arca to be acquired for ROU ( In Hectare)

5

3

+

2

1

00-05-66 Surat

Nala

Choryasi Khazod

51/70

00-51-55

51/71 2322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

4

2

5

1 1

3

Surat Choryasi Khazpd- 63/93

Surat

00-15-18

63/94

Contd.

63/95

56/80

00-54-53

57/81-A

81-800-37-33

57/ }

44/38

00-39-43

Canal

00-04-92

32/43

32/44

{

00-29-84

31/36

31/37

00-37-20

31/38

31/39

30/35-

00-29-03

30/35- }

24/26

00-18-41

25/32-A

00-00-22

25/32-B }

25/31

23/30

23/27

00-13-81

23/25

20/23

00-04-06

00-71-23

15/19 -A

17/20

00-01-46

Road

00-05-90

12/17 -A

12/17 -B 00-12-15

}

111 /A- 1- 100-62-92

177

Cart Track 00-07-53

00-64-49

135/210 -B

140/213 00-24-17

133/211 -A

133/211 -B 00-46-35

}

131 /207 - A

131/207-800-71-70

130/206 00-03-13

00-77-63

111/A- 1-177

Nala

00-06-41

07-96-24

Total

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 2

3

4

5 Choryasi Magdalla-42/1

42/2

Contd.

00-18-85

42/1

42/2

00-06-56

43/2-P

43/1-P

43/3

00-31-40

43/4

43/5

44/1-P

44/1

00-40-79

44/2

44/3

45

00-16-58

36

00-01-47

38/1

38/2

00-42-09

38/3

}

37

00-23-88

22

00-44-26

34/1

34/1-P

00-53-19

34/2

}

33

33/1 -P

33/1/P

00-08-85

33/2 -P

33/4

33/5

77/1

77/2

00-21-44

77/3

78

00-89-31

79

00-22-52

TOTAL 04-21-19 [F. No. L -14014/23/05 G.P. (Part - 1) ]

S.B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2323

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1050.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र , तारीख 6-8-2005 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ . संख्या 2762 तारीख 02-08-2005 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि तहसील- हालोल , जिल्ला पंचमहाल , राज्य गुजरात में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादनों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , वडोदरा द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी .

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता . 07-09-2005 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि ड्रस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि मे विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शत्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड वडोदरा में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: पंचमहाल

तालुका: हालोल

गाँव का नाम

उप-खण्डसं.

सर्वेक्षण सं -खण्ड सं.

2

3 1

2313

P2 कंजरी( चंन्द्रपुरा )

2312

2315

2317

2316

2

2314

2335

P1

P1

2333

2333

P2

2334

:

241

2

2/3

209

राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मिटर

एयर

हेक्टर

6 4

5

0

01

64

01

0

18 0

79

05

0

11-

97

20

0

91

39 0

37

36

0

18 0

36

27

0

00

01

39

40 0

38

68 0

29

66

0

27 0

01 2324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

208

कंजरी (चन्द्रपुरा)

214

(जारी ... )

215

230

237

235

242

112

मुवाला

2/1

108

109

1/1/P

109

1/2/P

109

2P

105

P

104

2/P

78

78

4/ P

111

106

2/1

102

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

36

80 0

25

83 0

0

11

31 0

49

05

0

44

43

07

36 0

0

06

83 0

24

42

29

88 0

0

12

17

0

16

01 0

16

49 0

68

35

22

90 0

20

01 0

0

81

49

16 0

00

0

03

00

37 0

03

[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2006- ओ.आर. - 1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2006

S. O. 1050.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India . Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O. 2762 dated 02-08-2005 under sub section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the schedule Tehsil -Halol , Dist. Panchmahal , State Gujarat , for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujaratby the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas , the copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the general public on 07-09-2005.

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification should be acquired.

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification ishereby acquired for laying the pipeline .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2325

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby direct that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting the Central Government, vests from the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

Dist:- Panch Mahal Tehsil: Haloi

Survey/Block NO. Sub -Division NO .

Name of Village

2

3 1

P2

2313

Kanjari (Chandrapura )

2312

2315

2317

2316

2314

2335

2333

2머머

2333

2334

241

2

209

2/3

1

208

214

215

230

237

235

242

112

Muwala

108

2/1

1 /1/P

109

1/2/P

109

2

109

P

105

104

2/P

78

4/P

78

111

2/1

106

102

State: Gujarat

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 4

6

5

64 0

01

01

18 0

0

05

79

11

0

97

91

20

0

37

39

0

36

0

18

27

0

36

01

00

0

39

40 0

38

0

68

66

0

29

27

01

0

80

36

00

25

83

31

11

0

49

0

05

44

43

0

36

07

0

0

83

06

0

24

42 0

29

88

17

0

12

0

01

16

0

16

49

35

0

68

22

90

0

01

20

0

49

81

0

16

00

0

03

0

00

0

37

03

[F. No. R-25011 /7/2006- O.R.- I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

2326

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1051.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 5) ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र , तारीख 6-8-2005 मे प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ . संख्या 2759 तारीख 02-08-2005 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि तहसील - घोघंबा , जिल्ला पंचमहाल , राज्य गुजरात में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादनों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , वडोदरा द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी .

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 07-09-2005 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचिमे विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड वडोदरा में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: पंचमहाल

राज्य : गुजरात

तालुका: धोधंबा

क्षेत्रफल

गाँवकानाम

उप-खण्डसं.

सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्डसं.

हेक्टर

वर्ग मिटर

एयर

3

2

1

4

6

5

90

0

27

45 धामावाव

7

0

48

13

0

16

11

07

0

06

12

38

2

32

75

0

21

24

115

P2+ P3

0

25

1

03

52

67

0

00

117

P1

11

0

0

65

117

P3

00

09

25

63

0

2

118

0

30

09 [भाग II- खण्ड : सग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2327

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

2

3 1

1+2 धामावाव (जारी )

10

65

62

3

62

23

32

2

8

49

शेरपुरा

1

191

2

191

190

189

1+2

194

1

193

2

193

195

196

20

19

21

1

26

2

26

27

28

:

48

43

47

1

46

3

46

2A+2B

38

1A

38

60

1

59

84

86

85

197

सीमलीया

187

P1

188

P2

188

1

182

183

181

2

179

1

179

4

179

2P1

148

5

4

6 0

27

89

26

0

25

18

38

0

06

88

0

25

39 3322

08

24

99

0

26

08

0

54

10

0

12

73

0

47

11

0

23

10

0

96

02

0

97

06

0

08

11.

0

73

20

0

03

23 0

55

15

0

84

10

0

14

71 0

61

13

0

14

65 0

03

20

0

13

12

0

77

02

0

18

05

0

49

05

0

92

05

0

63

13

0

71

00

0

09

08

0

77

19

0

63

13

0

35

10

0

64

23

0

46

07

0

94

04

0

83

16

0

03

01

0

56

37

0

01

01

0

23

10

0

47 0

97

16

0

00 0

09

71

05

0 2328

THE - GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

1

2

3

148

सीमलीया (जारी)

176

2

176

1

145

144

4

144

6

3

144

140

141

2

100

4

100

3

100

1

100

5

99

108

83

82

P1

81 78 78

79

80

1

61

62

57

1+4

57

3

782

56

2

783

4

1

5

2

5

1

701

1

702

1

702

3

700

2

651

1

653

खीलोडी ( रीचवानी )

165

166

167

1

12

19

P1+P2

8

7

6

5

4

25

26

29

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] 4

5

0

12

53 0

07

87 0

07

34 0

15

10 0

07

90 0

08

85 0

08

59 0

31

58 0

19

07 0

06

51 0

02

13

0

08

69 0

10

53 0

32

32 0

21

57 0

04

73 0

07

52

33

03

12

41

0

19

13

0

00

25

0

38

06

0

18

54

0

04

15

0

12

91

0

00

82

0

09

61

0

15

14

0

10

66

0

06

42

0

15

87

0

00

82

0

14

44

0

18

39

03

0

23

0

32

86

0

09

52

0

42

03

0

25

04

0

22

57

0

05

83

26

81

0

21

56

0

03

37

0

00

77

0

11

26

0

12

77

0

22

41

0

09

53

23

0

12 2329

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2

187

खीलोडी ( रीचवानी ) ( जारी )

190

188

205

206

223

224

236

P2

225

2+5

218

226

5

191 191 207

191

2+3

15

शानीयादा

14

13

12

1P2

11

6

5

0

26

98 0

20

15

49 0

12

08

45 0

04

09

0

0

12

76

56 0

14

0

01

92

93 0

08

00

94 0

33

27 0

65

07

8

05

92

70 0

09

0

85

29

63 0

32

85 0

18

13 0

10

50 0

31

[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2006-ओ.आर. - 1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2006

S. O. 1051.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India . Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O. 2759 dated 02-08-2005 under sub section (1) ofsection 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the schedule M Tehsil -Goghamba , Dist. Panchmahal , State Gujarat, for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratiam in the State of Gujarat by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas , the copies of the said gazete notification were made available to the general public on 07-09-2005.

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government:

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification should be acquired.

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline .

643 Gl/2006-14 2330

THE GAZETIE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006/ PHALGUN 27 , 1927

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (4) of section 6 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby direct that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting the Central Government, vests from the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

Dist Panch Mahal Tehsil : - Goghamba

Sub -Div . NO .

Name of Village Survey/Block NO .

3 1

2

80

Damavav

7

11

12

2

75

115

P2+ P3

1

67

117

P1

P3

117

63

2

118

1+2

10

65

2

62

23

3

62

32

2

8

49

Sherpura

1

191

2

191

190

189

1+2

194

1

193

2

193

195

196

20

19

21

1

26

2

26

27

28

State:- Gujarat

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4

5

6

45

0

27

0

13

48

0

07

16

0

6

38

0

21

32

0

25

24

52

0

03

0

00

11

0

00

65

0

09

25

0

30

09

0

27

89

26

0

25

0

38

18

0

06

88

25

0

39

0

22

08

0

24

99

26

0

08

0

10

54

0

12

73

0

11

47

0

10

23

0

02

96

0

06

97

11

08

0

0

20

73

0

23

03

0

15

55

0

10

84

0

14

71

0

13

61

0

14

65

0

20

03 2331

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

3

2

1

48

Sherpura (Contd.)

43

47

1

46

3

46

2A+2B

38

1A

38

60

1

59

84

86

85

197

Simaiiya

187

P1

188

P2

188

1

182

183

181

2

179

1

179

4

179

2P1

148

148

2

176

176

1

145

4

144

144

6

3

144

140

2

141

100

4

3

100

100

1

5

100

99

108

83

P1

82

78

P1

6

4

5

13

0

12

02

77

0

18

05

0

05

0

49

92

05

63

0

13

71

00

0

09

0

08

77

0

19

0

63

13

35

0

10

64

23

0

07

46

0

0

04

94

0

83

16

03

01

0

56

37

0

01

01

0

23

0

10

47

00

0

97

0

16

0

00

09

0

71

05

53

12

0

87

0

34

0

07

15

10

0

0

07

90

85

0

08

59

0

08

0-

31

58

07

0

19

51

0

06

0

02

13

0

69

08

53

0

10

0

32

32

57

0

21

73

0

04

0

07

52

0

03

33 2332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

1

2

3

81

Simallya ( Contd .)

79

80

1

61

62

57

1+4

3

57

782

56

2

783

4

1

5

2

5

1

701

1

1

702

702

3

700

2

651

1

653

165

Khilodi (Richvani )

166

167

1

12

19

P1+P2

8

7

6

5

4

25

26

29

187

190

188

205

206

223

224

236

P2

225

218

2+5

226

207

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 4

5

6

0

41

12

0

19

13

25

0

00

0

06

38

0

18

54

0

15

04

0

12

91

00

0

82

09

0

61

15

14

0

10

66

0

0

42

06

0

15

87

0

82

00

0

14

44

0

18

39

0

03

23

32

86

0

0

52

09

0

03

42

0

25

04

0

22

57

0

05

83

26

0

81

0

21

56

0

03

37

0

00

77

0

11

26

0

12

77

22

0

41

09

53

0

0

23

12

26

0

98

0

20

15

0

12

49

0

08

45

0

04

09

0

12

76

0

14

56

0

01

92

0

08

93

0

00

94

0

33

27

0

07

65 2333

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

5

6

4

3

2

1

05

92

0

5

191

Khilodi ( Richvani ) (Contd.)

70

09

0

1+A1

2+3

85

0

29

15

Shaniada

63

0

32

14

0

18

85

13

13

10

1P2

0

12

50

0

31

11

[F. No. R-25011/7/2006- O.R.-1 ] S. K. CHITKARA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च , 2006

का. आ . 1052.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र , तारीख 6-8-2005 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ . संख्या 2760 तारीख 02-08-2005 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि तहसील- गोधरा , जिल्ला पंचमहाल , राज्य गुजरात में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादनों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , वडोदरा द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता . 07-09-2005 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गईथी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचिमे विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है 1

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड वडोदरा में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा । 2334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

अनुसूची तालुका: गोधरा

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

जिला: पंचमहाल

गाँव कानाम

सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्ड सं. उप-खण्डसं.

2

1

3 गोलाव

665

2

654

615

620

629

P2

631

632

635

643

P1, P2

642

640

644

P3

528

527

1

527

2

527

3

524

522

523

538

P

537

539

459

449

450

448

452

233

3P1

233

2

233

1

230

253

254

256

257

258

261

2

260

3

1

260

260

2

265

265

72

280

2

266

P1 राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर

वर्ग मिटर एयर

4

5

6

0

66

09

0

00

33

0

15

32

0

21

77

0

30

55

0

00

45

41

0

75

0

09

37

0

01

74

0

48

92

0

02

12

17

0

76

0

19

97

0

08

66

0

19

26

0

07

66

0

25

81

0

06

75

0

21

20

12

0

45

0

12

97

0

20

88

0

13

16

0

21

24

0

00

89

16

0

66

0

11

74

0

44

27

0

36

03

69

0

11

0

10

93

0

06

73

0

20

28

0

34

07

0

19

90

15

0

39

0

15

81

0

08

08

0

04

94

0

08

50

0

28

90

0

08

18

0

03

43

0

32

26 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

1

2

3 गोलाव (जारी)

310

309

311

P2

311

3/P1

305

1

305

P2

312

दहीकोट

51

52

P2

52

P1

69

P1+2

68

2

72

1+2

71

74

73

75

160

159

158

210

P1

212

1

212

2

214

1

214

2

215

234

1

234

2

201

1

201

2

200

2

223

195

3

195

2

195

4

194

235

1B

2335 4

5

6

0

08

64

0

15

95

0

07

95

0

13

76

0

11

08

0..

05

81

0

01

46

0

00

65

0

07

06

0

18

22

0

31

57

0

05

09

0

17.

85

0

13

83

0

10

78 0

14

44

0

13

18

0

01

61

0

14

94

0

26

67

55

0

07

66

0

06

87

0

00

78

0

10

46

0

17

06

0

18

46

0

14

63

0

08

46

0

16

26

0

04

09

0

12

98

0

09

85

0

04

28

0

00

75

0

04

02

0

24

78

[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2006- ओ.आर. - 1] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2006

S. O. 1052.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India . Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O. 2760 dated 02-08-2005 under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the schedule Tehsil -Godhra , Dist . Panchmahal , State Gujarat , for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited. M

And whereas , the copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the general public on 07-09-2005.

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub-section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

2336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that right of user in the land specified in the schedule appendedto this notification should be acquired.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline.

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4 ) of section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby direct that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting the Central Government , vests from the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

Dist:- Panch Mahal Tehsil: - Godhra

Survey/Block NO . Sub-Div . NO .

Name of Viilage

3

2

1

2

665

Gollav

654

615

620

P2

629

631

632

635

P1, P2

643

642

640

644

P3

528

1

527

2

527

3

527

524

522

523

538

22 P2

537

539

459

449

450

448

452

3P1

233

2

233

1

233

230

253

254

256

257

State:- Gujarat

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

5

6

4

66

09

0

00

33

0

32

15

0

21

77

0

55

0

30

00

45

0

0

41

75

37

0

09

01

74

0

0

48

92

12

0

02

76

17

0

19

0

97

0

08

66

19

26

0

0

07

66

25

81

0

75

0

06

20

21

0

12

0

45

97

0

12

88

0

20

16

13

0

21

24

0

0

00

89

66

0

16

0

11

74

0

44

27

03

0

36

11

69

0

10

93

0

73

06

0

28

20

0

0

07

34

0

90

19 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2337

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

1

2

3

258

Gollav(Contd. )

2

261

3

260

1

260

2

260

265

265

72

280

266

머 P1

310

309

311

311

305

305

-2012 P2 3/P1

312

51

Dahikot

52

52

P 먼머 P2

P1+2

69

2

68

1+2

72

71

74

73

75

160

159

158

210

1

212

212-

2

1

214

214

2

215

1

234

234

2

1

201

2

201

200

2

223

3

195

2

195

4

195

194

1B

235

643 GI/2006-15

6

4

5

39

15

0

0

81

15

08

0

08

04

94

0

50

08

0

90

28

0

18

08

0

43

03

0

26

64

8

95

15

0

95

07

0

76

13

0

11

08

0

81

05

0

46

01

0

65

00

0

06

07

0

22

0

18

31

57

0

09

05

0

85

17

0

13

83

0

78

10

0

44

14

18

13

0

61

01

0

94

14

26

67

55

11

07

66

87

06

78

00

46

10

06

17

000000

46

18

63

14

0

08

46

0

16

26

0

09

04

0

98

12

0

85

09

0

28

04

0

00

75

0

04

0

02

78

24

0

[F. No. R- 25011/7/2006- O.R. - 1 ] S. K. CHITKARA, Under Secy.

2338

THE GAZETTE OF DIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1053.- पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिक 1982 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र, 8-8-2005 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की आना आ. संख्या 2761 तारीख 02-08-2005 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबाश अनुसूरिजी -कालोल , जिल्ला पंचमहाल , राज्य गुजरात में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादनों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , वडोदरा द्वाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय को धषणा की थी.

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां था. 07-09-2005 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने लयत अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार कोरिर्पोट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिफ्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिधाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि मे चिनिर्दष्ट भूमि में समर्थता के अरिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड वडोदरा में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: पंचमहाल

तालुका:कालोल

राज्य: गुजरात गाँव का नाम

उप-खण्ड सं.

सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर

वर्ग मिटर

क्षेत्रफल एयर

1

2

3

4

5

6 269

मधवास

0

06

83 270

0

11

12 271

0

17

02 272

04

75

0

265

P1

09

67 264

P1

0

17

88

P1

258

0

11

51

P2

0

258

10

98 259

0

10

93 242

0

29

01

233

0

14

44 234

0

22

56 2339

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3

2

231

मधवास (जारी )

235

236

238

216

217

..

212

P1

212

211

191

193

195

1

198

196

P1

197

170

166

P1

100

P2

100

P2

101

P3

101

P3

102

3

103

1

104

2

104

95

94

90

111

88

P2

165

अनिधरा

164

145

जेतपुर

144

153

114

1+2

1.15

107

1

295

1

293

1

307

2

307

311

124

1

125

119

106

108

6

5

4

17 00

0

42 17

0

46 0

00

71 14

0

01 0

76 OB

0

79 00

0

83 07

0

96 21

0

39 022

0

71 18

0

40 122

0

65 00

0

34 0

00

36 26

0

24 07

0

03

15

0

37 01

0

09

08

0

07

02 0

89

06

0

30

09

0

02

19

0

05

07

0

16

05

0

07 0

9

61

10

0

44

24

0

13

C3

0

49

00

0

84

21

0

79

19

0

09

04

0

31

12

0

04

24

0

88

18

0

04

21

0

10

10

0

41

13

0

86

09

0

75

10

0

70

10

0

36

00

0

07

00

0

44

20

0

53

20

0

41

00

0

01

08

0 2340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

1

2

3

66

1 जेतपुर (नारी )

287

313

286

285

1

120

116

BP1

129

121

294

1

308

148

147

1

109

146

143

310

20

जमनापुर

19

------

2

1

1

1

123

41

अलवा

円

42

46

44

----

53

66

머 P1

66

?- P2

67

65

64

62

머머

63

96

95

P3

309

99

22

------

24

43

97

머머.

307

कंडाच

43

295

P1

294

P1

294

P2

296

305

3

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

5

6 0

13

16 0

19

22 0

03

16 0

02

21 0

24

31 0

20

90 0

00

17 0

30

00 0

36

75 0

28

75 0

48

54 0

37

71 0

21

69 0

38

57 0

26

74 0

12

03

30

0

39 0

17

69 0

11

50 0

11

34 0

22

32 0

09

36 0

06

16

26 26 48 28

0

36

00

0

25

03

0

75 0

01

02 0

08

45 0

10 09

0

01

50 0

18

95 0

04

46 08

0

06 0

06

75 0

08

80 0

04

60 0

53 28

0

09

41 0

33

55 0

03

79 25

0

73 28

0

44 0

15

27 0

81

82 0

62 05

0

09

00 0

15

29 0

06

57

37 01

0 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2341

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

1

2

3

304

कंडाज (जारी )

303

1

306

1

306

2

314

323.

322

1

322

2

321

320

319

1

12

402

2

410

411

412

413

445

446

447

1

450

457

136

2 ऊतरेडीया

135

1

146

P2

1/1

134

147

A

133

1/1

149

107

150

104

1

104

2

105

103

1

102

1

102

2

1

101

96

93

159

94

1+8

94

5

6

12

0

48 0

03

43 0

01

38 06

0

85 0

28

68 0

09

19 0

05

47 0

10

01 0

04

87 0

09

01 0

22

07 0

03

49 0

15

31 09

68 14

24 04

000

59

86 22

00

29 0

03

70 0

00

25 0

13

71

0

01

91 0

07 18

0

16

41

0

00

15 0

02

84 0

13

53 0

02 13

0

01

00

0

32 17

07

0

28 0

07

15

66 02

0

0

06 12

0

30

05

12

0

82

07

81

0

14

0

08

06

84

0

39

0

15

07

74

0

0

00

53

1+8P1 & 1 +4P1

94

A2/ 1

A2/ 2

94

6

94

7

94

17

1

73

67

0

04

67

0

04

47

0

04

0

47

04

0

28

84

16

47

0 2342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

2

1

3

1

72

ऊतरेडीया (जारी )

71

1

1

68

2

68

63

1

64

2

64

57

1/1

55

1

48

49

1

47

46

1

1

45

45

2+3

1+2

44

414

अलाली

-2

415

3

416

417

424

-10

2

424

425

423

427

428

429

3

434

व्यासडा

78

74

75

80

82

83

111

110

114

115

1507

1504

1503

1502

1488

1487

1486

1484

1481

1480

1456

[PART II-SEC . 3( i) )

5

4

57

17

0

22

31 0

05

32 0

17

10 0

62

11

0

48

07

0

07

49 0

27

00 0

22

06

0

27

34

0

95 09

0

11 0

05

00

0

19

12

62

25

70 0

03

0

43

07

13

0

07

97 0

07

28 0

06

69 0

06

91 0

05

0

80

27 0

01

0

10

28

10

96 0

34 0

15

13

49 0

0

07

15

02

71 0

42

66 0

70 0

00

97

09

0

27 0

42

53

23

0

11 0

31

39

00

0

0

18

19

11

58 0

0

91 27

00

98 0

32 0

09

11

80 0

08

0

60

97 0

08

0

17

80

07

11

0

22

12

0

0

01

06

0

06

86 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

1

2

3

1457

व्यासडा ( जारी ) ।

1441

1440

1439

1426

A

A

1427

1430

1438

1413

1412

1216

1235

1236

1237

1198

1199

1197

1263

1195

1107

1516

A

1186

1187

अदादरा

755

1

754

754

2+4

756

1

756

2

785

1

2

785

786

1

1

803

803

2

802

4

800

1

835

1A

835

1B

834

833

52

62

1/P1

62

2/P1

61

59

2

58

2

77

78

2343 4

5

0

08

58 0

02

94 0

04

43 0

08

06 0

13

72 0

15

43 0

11

72 0

01

13 0

25 43

08

0

86 0

25

57 0.

06

92 05

0

52 0

04

76

10

0

76 0

03

40 0

09

51 0

10

43 0

07

25 09

0

87 0

03

68 0

05

74 0

01

93 0

15

78

0

01

12 0

00

33

0

05

23 0

05

62

0

09

28

25

0

30

0

15

88

0

06

92.

0

15

26

0

20

65

0

00

36

0

00

59

0

11

87

0

22

64

0

14

00

0

31

48

0

10

05

0

17

19

0

24

17

0

13

12

0

09

69

0

02

44

0

00

22 2344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

2

3 1

1

79

अदादरा ( जारी)

82

83

86

1

85

2

85

1

112

भुकी

2

112

110

113

54

113

2

113

7

113

118

117

116

116

84

87

87

79

88

71

71

70

69

69

68

64

6

फानसी

7

43

44

-12-12-212-12--111-

21

40

39

24

25

1P1

26

1P2

26

33

1

310

करोली

2

310

3

310

308

255

320

1

320

313

1P1

313

309

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii )]

6

5

4

30 0

29

79 0

52

67

12

0

72 06

0

24

02

0

18 0

20

80

13

0

18

80 0

40

06

0

31

30 0

94

07

0

11

02

0

10

01

0

60

09

0

79

07

0

11

83 0

51

12

0

62

16

0

34

09

0

46

23

0

69

08

0

37

10

0

43

07

0

43

07

0

66 0

08

69

11

0

06

03

0

94

08

0

27

21

0

13

13

0

98

46

0

46

00

0

53

35

0

34

13

0

55

13

0

90

18

0

10

50 0

07

84 0

29

16

0

96

11

0

54

25

0

30

01

0

62

16

0

06

08

0

10

89 0

79

16

0

06

17

0

24

09

0

29

23

0

46

01

0

06

26

0 [ भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2345

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

1

2

3

4

6

5

करोली (जारी )

256

1

0

24

93

256

1P1

0

01

01

254

0

09

82

321

1/1

0

00

93

321

0

16

19

255

0

46

01

255

1

0

14

14

[फा. सं. आर-25011 /7/2006- ओ.आर.- I ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2006

S. O. 1053-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O. 2761 dated 02-08-2005 under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the schedule ли Tehsil -Kalol , Dist . Panchmahal , State Gujarat, for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat by the Indiar Oil Corporation Limited .

And whereas , the copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the general public on 07-09-2005.

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 ofthe said Act , submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification should be acquired.

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification ishereby acquired for laying the pipeline.

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (4) of section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby direct that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting the Central Government , vests from the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited free from all encumbrances .

643 GI/2006-16 2346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

[PART II -SEC . 3(ii )

SCHEDULE

Dist:- Panch Mahal Tehsil:- Kalol

Survey/Block NO. Sub -Division NO.

Name of Village

2

1

P1

269

Madhvas

270

271

272

265

264

어머머 P1 P1 P1

258

P2

258

259

242

233

234

231

235

236

238

3

216

217

212

P1

212

211

191

193

195

1

198

196

P1

197

170

166

P1

100

P2

100

P2

101

P3

101

P3

102

3

103

-104

2

104

95

94

90

State : Gujarat

Area

Are Sq.mtr. Hectare

6

5

4

06

83 0

12 0

11

02

17

0

0

04

75

67 0

09

0

17

88

11

51 0

0

10

98

10

0

93

01

0

29

44

14

0

0

22

56 0

17

00

17

42 0

46

00

0

71

14

0

11

01 0

76

03

0

79

00

0

07

83 0

96

21

0

02

39 0

71

18

0

40

12

0

00

66 0

34 0

00

36

26

0

07

24 0

03

15

0

37 0

01

08

0

09

07

02 0

0

06

89

30 0

09

02 0

19

0

05

07

0

05

16

07

19

0

0

10

61

24

44 0 2347

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3

2

1

111

Madhvas ( Contd. )

88

P2

165

Anidara

164

145

Jetpur

144

153

114

1+2

115

107

1

295

1

293

1

307

2

307

311

124

1

125

119

106

108

1

66

287

313

286

1

285

120

116

BP1

129

121

1

294

308

148

1

147

109

146

143

310

20

Jamanapur

19

2

1

1

2

1

3

1

P1

41

Alwa

5

4

13

03

0

49 0

00

21

84 0

0

19

79

09

04

0

31 0

12

04 0

24

18

88 0

04

21

0

10

10

0

41

13

0

09

86

75 0

10

10

70 0

36 0

00

07 0

00

0

20

44

20

53 0

0

41

00

01 0

08

0

13

16.

22

19

0

0

03

16

21 0

02

0

24

31

20

90 0

17

00

0

0

00

30

75 0

36

0

75

28

54 0

48

71

37

0

21

0

69

57 0

38

0

74

26

03

12

0

39

30

0

17

69 0

50

11

0

34 0

11

32

22

0

36 0

09

48

06

0

26 0

16 2348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

1

2

3

42

Alwa(Contd.)

46

44.

53

66

66

67

65

P1

64

62

P1

63

96

95

P

309

99

22

24

43

97

P 머머 P1

307

43

Kandach

295

294

머머

294

P2

296

305

-3

304

303

1

306

1

2

306

314

323

322

1

322

2

321

320

319

1

402

2

410

411

412

413

445

446

[PART II- SEC . 3(i ) ) 4

5

6

0

28

36

0

00

25

0

03

75

0

01

02

0

08

45

0

09

10

0.

01

50

0

18

95

0

04

46

0

08

06

0

06

75

0

08

80

0

04

60

0

28

53

0

09

41

0

33

55

0

03

79

0

25

73

0

28

44

0

15

27

0

81

82

0

05

62

0

09

00

0

15

29

0

06

57

0

01

37

12

0

48

0

03

43

0

01

38

0

06

85

0

28

68

0

09

19

0

05

47

0

10

01

04

0

87

0

09

01

0

22

07

0

03

49

0

15

31

0

09

68

0

14

24

0

04

59

0

08

86

0

22

29 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2349

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

2

3

447

1 Kandach (Contd. )

450

457

2

136

Utrediya

135

1

146

P2

1/1

134

147

A

133

1/1

149

107

150

104

1

2

104

105

103

1

102

1

2

102

101

1

96

93

159

94

1+8 4

6

5

70

0

03

0

00

25

13

71

0

0

01

91

0

18

07

0

41

16

0

00

15

0

02

84

0

13

53

0

13

02

0

00

01

0

32

17

0

07

28

07

0

15

0

02

66

12

0

06

0

05

30

0

12

82

0

07

81

0

08

14

0

06

84

0

15

39

0

07

74

1+8P1 & 1 +4P1

94

94

A2/1

94

A2/2

6

94

7

94

17

1

73

72

1

71

1

1

68

2

68

63

64

1

12

64

2

57

55

1/1

48

1

49

47

1

1

46

1

45

0

00

53

0

04

67

0

67

04

0

04

47

0

04

47

0

28

84

0

16

47

0

17

57

0

22

31

0

32

05

0

17

10

0

11

62

07

0

48

0

49

07

0

27

00

0

06

22

34

0

27

0

09

95.

0

05

11

19

0

00

0

62

12 2350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27, 1927

2 1

45 Utrediya ( Contd. )

44 Alali

414

415

416

417

424

424

425

423

427

428

429

434.

78 Vyasda

74

75

80

82

83

111

110

114

115

1507

1504

1503

1502

1488

1487

1486

1484

1481

1480

1456

1457

1441

1440

1439

1426

1427

1430

1438

1413

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii) ) 3

4

5

6

0

2+3

70

25

1+2

0

03

43

0

13

07

07

0

97

23 3

07

0

28

0

06

69

1

06

0

91

2

0

05

80

01

27

0

0

10

28

0

10

96

0

15

34

0

13

49

3

07

0

15

0

02

71

0

66

42

0

00

70

0

09

97

0

42

27

0

53

23.

0

31

11

0

00

39

0

18

19

0

11

58

0

27

91

00

0

98

0

32

09

0

11

80

0

08

60

97

0

08

0

17

80

0

11

07

0

12

22

0

06

01

0

06

86

0

58

08

0

02

94

0

04

43

0

08

06

13

A

72

0

0

15

43

0

11

72

0

01

13

0

43

25 2351

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

3

2

1

1412

Vyasda(Contd.)

1216

1235

1236

1237

1198

1199

1197

1263

1195

1107

A

1516

1186

1187

755

Adadara

1

754

2+4

754

1

756

2

756

1

785

2

785

786

1

803

1

2

803

4

802

1

800

1A

835

1B

835

834

833

52

1/P1

62

2/P1

62

61

2

59

58

2

77

78

79

1

82

83

86

1

85

2

85

6

5

4

86

08

0

57

25

0

0

92

06

52

0

05

76

04

0

76

0

10

40

0

03

51

09

0

10

43

0

25

07

0

87

0

09

03

68

0

74

0

05

01

93

0

78

0

15

0

12

01

00

33

0

23

05

0

0

62

05

0

28

09

25

30

0

88

15

0

06

92

0

15

26

0

0

20

65

00

36

0

59

0

00

11

87

0

64

22

0

14

00

0

31

48

0

10

0

05

17

0

19

24

17

0

13

12

0

09

69

0

44

02

0

22

00

0

30

29

0

79

0

52

0

12

67

0

72

06

0

02

24

18

20

0 2352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

1

2

3

1

112

Bhuki

112

2

110

113

113

113

5427 5

113

118

117

116

12

116

84

87

1

87

2

79

88

2

71

1

71

2

70

69

2

69

68

84

6

Fansi

7

43

44

21

40

39

24

25

26

28

1P2

33

310

1 Karoli

310

2

310

3

308

255

320

320

1

313

313

1P1

309

256

1

256

1P1

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

5

6

0

13

80

0

18

80

06

40

0

0

31

30

0

07

94

0

02

11

0

01

10

0

09

60

0

07

79

11

0

63

0

12

51

16

0

62

09

34

0

23

46

0

69

06

0

10

37

0

07

43

0

43

07

66

06

11

69

0

03

06

0

08

94

0

21

27

0

13

13

0

46

96

00

46

35

53

13

34

0

13

55

0

18

90

0

50

10

0

07

84

16

0

29

0

11

96

0

25

54

0

01

30

0

16

62

0

08

06

10

0

89

0

16

79

0

17

06

0

24

09

0

23

29

0

46

01

0

26

06

0

24

93

0

01

01 2353 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

1

2

3

4

5

6 254

0

09

82 Karoli (Contd.)

321

1/1

0

00

93 321

0

16

19 255

01

0

46 255

1

14

14

0

[F. No. R-25011 /7/2006-0.R. -1 ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1054. केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन )अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 3581 , तारीख 5 , अक्तूबर , 2005 द्वारा तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुच्विराप्पल्ली होकर मदुराई तक और आसनूर से शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी । और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 28.10.2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केंद्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केंद्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।

अतः अब , केंद्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

यह और कि केंद्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केंद्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

643 GI/ 2006-17 2354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]

अनुसूची

जिला : तिरुच्चिराज्यल्ली

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य: तमिलनाडु

क्षेत्रफल

हिस्सा जंबर

2

3 1

41

नं. 30. भरुधूर

3

331

43

43

3 क

44

2क

44

5

67

1ब

64

1ज

वर्ग मीटर आर

हेक्टर

5

6 00

0

73 02

0

44 0

02

17 0

01

80 0

36 03

0

60 05

00

0

92 0

00

81

जिला : तिरुच्चिराप्पल्ली

तालूका : तिरुच्चिरापल्ली

2

3 1

6231

10ल नं . 60. कूत्तप्यार

2

60अ

2

60 ब

राज्य :तमिलनाडु

6

5

4.

63 02

19 02

0

50 0

00

[फा. सं. आर-25011/29/2004-ओ.आर. - 1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिय

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2006

S. O. 1054.- Whereas , by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3581 dated the 5th October 2005 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , (herein after referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Madurai via Tiruchirapalli and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public from 28.10.2005 ;

And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government;

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2355

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

District : TIRUCHIRAPALLI

Taluk : LALGUDI

Name of the Village

Survey No. Sub - Division No.

2

3 1

41

4 NO.30 MARUDUR

43

3A

43

3B

3C

43

44

2C

44

5

67

1B

64

1B Taluk : TIRUCHIRAPALLI

State : TAMILNADU

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 4

6

5

0

00

73 0

02

44 0

02

17 0

01

80 0

03

36 0

60

05

0

92

00

0

00

81 State : TAMILNADU

District : TIRUCHIRAFALLI

3 1

2

62A

10B NO.60 KUTTAPPAR

60A

2

2

60B

6 4

5

0

02

63

02

0

19

50 0

00

[ F. No. R-25011/29/2004- O.R. - I ] S. K. CHATKARA , Under Secy.

2356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3( ) )

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च , 2006

و का. आ. 1055. केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है)की धारा 3 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का०आ० 3580 , तारीख 5, अक्तूबर, 2005 द्वारा तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुच्चिराप्पल्ली होकर मदुराई तक और आसनूर से शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।

और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 28.10.2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केंद्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केंद्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।

अतः अब , केंद्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अंर्जित किया जाता है ।

यह और कि केंद्रीय सरकार ,उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केंद्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : पेरम्बलूर

राज्य : तमिलनाडु तालूका : कुन्नम

क्षेत्रफल

हिस्सा नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाँव का नाम

आर

हेक्टर

वर्ग मीटर

6

5

4

3

2

1

61

00

0

4

329

नं . 27.तिरुमांदुरै

00

12

0

431

339

72

0

01

4ब

339

00

0

01

4क

339

40

0

00

4ड

339

[फा. सं. आर-25011/29/2004 ओ.आर. -1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव 2357 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2006

S. O. 1055.- Whereas , by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3580 dated the 5th October 2005 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land ) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , (herein after referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared , its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Madurai via Tiruchirapalli and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited ;

And, whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public from 28.10.2005;

And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government ; And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State : Tamil Nadu

District : Perambalur

Taluk: Kunnam

Area

Sub-Division no .

Survey no .

Name of the Village

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

4

6

5

2

3

1

61

0

4

00

329

NO.27 TIRUMANDURAI

00

0

12

339

4Á

0

01

72

4B

339

00

01

4C

0

339

0

40

00

4D

339

[F. No. R- 25011 /29/2004- O.R. - I ]

S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

2358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

[PART II-SFC . 3( ) )

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च, 2006

, का. . 1056. केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन)अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का०आ० 3579 , तारीख 5, अक्तूबर , 2005 द्वारा तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुच्चिराप्पल्ली होकर मदुराई तक और आसनूर से शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।

और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 28.10.2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केंद्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केंद्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।

अतः अब , केंद्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

यह और कि केंद्रीय सरकार ,उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केंद्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : तमिलनाडु जिला : कांजीपुरम

तालूका : श्रीपेरुम्पुदूर

क्षेत्रफल

हिस्सा नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाँव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

आर

हेक्टर

6

5

4

3

2

1

13

01

0

1

171

नं . 107 वलरपुरम

40

00

0

4.1

172

25

01

0

4.ब

172

86

02

0

1

161

20

02

0

5

160

80

02

0

1

159 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2359

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

2

3 1

2

159

107 वलरपुरम (जारी...)

278

13

4

280

631 नं 155 मांपाक्कम

88

88

6ब

6

90

4

238

12 ब

692

नं . 152 ऍच्चूर

692

13

7ब

693

148

1 ब नं . 214 ऍषिच्चूर

4

146

4

5

6

0

00

99 02

0

65 0

01

55 02

51 0

0

04 01

30 0

02

0

00

70 00

0

40 0

00

40

07 0

03

0

47 01

07

43 0

राज्य : तमिलनाडु

जिला : कांजीपुरम

तालूका : उत्तिरमेरूर

3

2

1

4

5

नं . 103 तंडरै

5अ

5

5

5ब

1

6

7

2अ

7

2ब

10

2अ

10

5अ

11

1

6

4

5

0

01

17 00

41 0

0

00

60 02

06 0

02

20

66 0

00

12 0

02

0

31 02

01

42 0

राज्य : तमिलनाडु

जिला : कांजीपुरम

तालूका : मदुरांदगम

1

3

2

113

नं . 38 विनायकनललूर

6

5

4

0

02 11

[फा. सं . आर -2501/29/2004- ओ.आर. -1 ] एस. के चिटकारा, अवर सचिव 2360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27, 1927 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2006

S. O. 1056.- Whereas , by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3579 dated the 5th October 2005 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of user in land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , ( herein after referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Madurai via Tiruchirapalli and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And , whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public from 28.10.2005;

And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government ;

And whereas, the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And furthe in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State : Tamil Nadu Taluk : Sri Perumbudur

District: Kancheepuram

Area

Sub-Division no .

Name of the Village

Survey no.

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr .

1

6

2

3

4

5

171

NO.107 VALARPURAM

1

0

01

13

0

172

00

40

4A

172

0

01

25

4B

161

1

86

02

160

20

5

0

02 2361

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3

2

1

1

108

NB. 107 VALAR PURAM

2

159

278

13

4

280

NO.155 MAMBAKKAM

6A

88

88

6B

6

90

4

238

NO.152 ECHOOR

692

12B

13

692

693

7B NO.214 EZHICHOOR

148

1B

4

146

Taluk : Uthiramerur

6 4

5

0

02

80 0

00

99 0

02

65

01

55 0

0

02

51 0

01

04 0

30

02

0

70

00

0

00

40 0

40

00

0

07

03

0

01

47

43

07

0-

State : Tamil Nadu

District: Kancheepuram

1

3

2

4

5

NO.103 THANDARAI

5A

5

5

5B

1

6

2A

7

7

2B

10

2A

5A

10

1

11

Taluk: Madurantakam

4

6

5

0

01

17

41 0

00

0

00

60

06 0

02

20

02

0

66 0

00

12

02

0

31 0

02

42

01

0

State : Tamil Nadu

District: Kancheepuram

3 1

2

113

NO.38 VINAYAGANALLUR

643 Gl/2006-18

6

5

4

0

11

02 [F. No. R-25011/29/2004-0.R. -I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy .

2362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च , 2006

का. आ . 1057.- केंद्रीय सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन )अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का०आ० 3578 , तारीख 5 , अक्तूबर, 2005 द्वारा तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुच्विराप्पल्ली होकर मदुराई तक और आसनूर से शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी । ,

और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 28.10.2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केंद्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केंद्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।

अतः अब , केंद्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

यह और कि केंद्रीय सरकार ,उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केंद्रीय सरकार में लिहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 2363

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य : तमिलनाडु

जिला : तिरुवल्लूर

तालूका : अम्बत्तूर

क्षेत्रफल

हिस्सा नंबर

गाँव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

सर्वे नंबर

आर

हेक्टर

6

5

4

2

3

1

84

02

0

1

46

नं . 28 अरियलूर

55

04

0

8 ब

56

08

50

0

6

56

03

06

0

1अ

273

नं . 1 कीषक्कोण्डैयार

48

04

0

1के

265

03

01

0

231

265

60

01

0

4

265

01

50

0

1ऐ

265

50

01

0

1 जे

265

58

01

0

212

265

96

00

0

5

265

44

00

0

2313

265

राज्य : तमिलनाडु

जिला : तिरुवल्लूर

तालूका : तिरुवल्लूर

6

4

5

3

2

1

59

0

01

231

233

नं .41 कोडुवली

04

11

0

232

233

08

12

0

3

233

18

01

0

1अ

255

42

01

0

1 ब

255

74

01

2

255

06

0

01

1अ

256

41

00

0

1 ब

256

64

02

0

3

49

नं . 87 वेप्पंटू

70

01

0

4

49

96

00

0

1

50

50

01

0

अ

50

89

02

52 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

2364

3

2

1

36

231

1

23

13

266

नं .90 आयत्तूर

266

1 ब

266

21

2ब

266

266

3

11

264

1 ब

264

116

1

236

2

236

3

236

1 ब

270

2ब

133

नं . 92 सॅव्वायपेट्‌टै

1

137

2

223

नं . 89 पॅरुमालपट्टू

221

1

3

224

नं . 136 तोडुकाडु

4

224

5

224

10

224

13

224

14

224

15

224

16

224

17

224

18

224

21

224

253

2

8

253

13

252

3

254

2

254

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

6 4

5

03

0

90

02 04

0

05

57 0

40 05

0

0

95 00

76 0

04

80 05

0

0

03

47 0

03

85

64 0

08

13

0

34

91 0

01

00

0

51 0

00

40 16

0

09

94 0

01

0

04

90

75 0

06

01

60 0

22 0

03

46 0

04

70 0

11

0

02

80

60 0

03

0

00

40 00

88 0

98 01

0

42 0

05

57 02

0

0

58 23

90 0

00

0

04

38

20 0

07

14 0

01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : 'मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

1

2

3

254

6

254

7

254

10

261

1

257

9

257

8

257

7

6

257

257

3

4

257

258

6

258

1

15

248

245

6

245

7

146

2

3

1446

5

146

147

2

2365 4

6

5

0

06

66 0

03

78 0

00

40 0

00 02

0

03

80 04

0

00 0

00

40 0

40 05

0

04

00 0

01

80 0

05

00 0

00 06

0

01

00 0

02

31 0

01

00 0

07

20 0

08

20 0

07

63 0

10

20 [फा. सं. आर-25011/29/2004- ओ.आर. -1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2006

S. O. 1057.- Whereas , by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3578 dated the 5th October 2005 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ), ( herein after referred to as the said Act ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Madurai via Tiruchirapalli and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public from 28.10.2005;

And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government ;

2366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27, 1927

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

District : Tiruvallur Taluk : Ambathur

Sub-Division no .

Survey no .

Name of the Village

2

3 1

1

46

NO.28 ARIYALUR

8B

56

6

56

273

1A NO.1 KILKONDAIYUR

1K

265

2A1

265

4

265

11

265

1J

265

265

2A2

265

5

2A3

265

District : Tiruvallur Taluk : Tiruvallur

3

2

1

2A1

233

NO.41 KODUVALI

233

2A2

3

233

255

1A

1B

255

State: Tamil Nadu

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 4

6

5

0

02

84

04

55 0

08

50 0

0

06

03 0

04

48

01

0

03

60 0

01

0

01

50 0

01

50

58 0

01

00

96 0

00

44 0

State : Tamil Nadu

6 4

5

0

01

59

11

04 0

0

12

08

18

01

0

01

42 0 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2367

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

2

1

3

2

255

No. 41 KO DUVALI

256

1A

256

1B

3

49

NO.87 VEPPAMBATTU

4

49

1

50

50

2A

52

2A

36

1

23

1A

266

NO.90 AYATHUR

1B

266

266

2A

2B

266

266

3

264

1A

264

1B

116

1

236

2

236

3

236

1B

270

2B

133

NO.92 SEVVAPETTAI

1

137

2

223

NO.89 PERUMALPATTU

1

221

224

3 NO.136 THODUKADU

224

4

224

5

224

10

13

224

224

14

224

15

224

16

224

17

18

224

21

224

253

2

6 4

5

01

74 0

0

06

01

0

00

41

64 0

02

01

70 0

0

00

96 0

50

01

02

0

89

03

90 0

0

04

02

57 0

05

40

05

0

00

95 0

04

76 0

05

0

80 0

03

47

03

85 0

0

64

08

13

0

34

01

0

91

00

0

51

40

00

0

16

0

09

01

0

94

04

0

90 0

06

75 0

01

60

03

22 0

46

04

0

11

0

70 0

02

80

60 0

03

40 0

00

0

OC

88 0

01

98 0

42

05

57 0

02

0

23

58 2368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

1

2

3

253

No.136 THODU KADU

8

252

13

254

3

254

2

6

254

254

7

254

10

261

1

257

9

8

257

257

7

6

257

3

257

4

257

6

258

258

1

248

15

245

6

245

7

146

2

146

3

146

5

2

147

[ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] 4

5

6 0

00

90 0

04

38 0

07

20 0

01

14 0

06

66 0

03

78 0

00

40

00 0

02

0

80

03

0

00

04

00

0

40 0

40

05

0

04

00 0

80

01.

0

00

05

06

00 0

0

00

01

0

02

31 0

01

00 0

07

20

08

20 0

63 0

07

0

20

10

[F. No. R-25011/29/2004- O.R. -I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secу.

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च, 2006

का. आ . 1058.- केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का ० आ० 3582 , तारीख 5, अक्तूबर , 2005 द्वारा तमिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई से तिरुच्चिराप्पल्ली होकर मदुराई तक और आसनूर से शंकरी तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी । و 2369 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18, 2006/ फाल्गुन 27, 1927

और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख. 28.10.2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केंद्रीय सख्कार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केंद्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाध्धान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।

अतः अब, केंद्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रयास शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूल में विजिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

यह और कि केंद्रीय सरकार ,उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केंद्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्वंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में हित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : तमिलनाडु

जिला : मदुरै

गालूका: मेलूर

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर हिस्सा नंबर

वर्ग मीटर

आर

हेक्टर

3

4

5

6 1

2

40

0

00

11

83

नं .47 सेक्किप्पट्टि

0

40

83

16

02

50

00

0

80

1 ब 1

00

0

02

80

131

80

0

82

04

9ब

0

01

48

10अ

82

05

0

01

76

50

0

00

71

7 अ

0

10

02

71.

631

20

0

01

71

4ब

0

40

01

14

71

82

0

00

12

71

12

0

02

136

1 एन

नं .46 कंबूर

01

22

0

136

1अ इ

50

01

0

1अक

136

643 GI/2006-19 2370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

तालूका मलूर

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

जिला: सदुरै

3

2

136

नं. 46 कंबूर

राज्य: तमिलनाडु

5

4

6 0

1अ जि

139

1128

4.अ

139

136

5अ

136

5क

136

5 ड

631

2 नं . 48 केसमपट्टी

632

2

633

3

जिला: मदुरै तालूका : मदुरै (सबुध)

1

2

3

53

7ब नं . 12 संपक्कुडी

53

73

53

5

53

6अ

51

11

51

2ब तालूका : तिरुमंडगलम जिला : मदुरै 1

3

2

19

1क 3 नं . 11. धर्मत्तुप्पट्टि

19

1 क 5 02

50 0

00

40 0

04

55 0

60 01

0

01

32 0

00

50 0

75 04

0

26

56 0

53 04

राज्य: तमिलनाडु

4

5

6 0

01

30 00

0

80 0

00

70 0

30 03

0

01

30 0

01

20 राज्य : तमिलनाडु

6 4

5

0

02

00 0

02

00 [फा. सं. आर-25011/29/2004- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2006

5. 0. 1058.- Whereas , by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3582 dated the 5th October 2005 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , ( herein after referred to as the said Act) the Centrai Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai to Madurai via Tiruchirapalli and Sankari in the State of Tamilnadu , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And , whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public from 28.10.2005;

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2371

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government; And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appendedto this notification should be acquired ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

Taluk : MELUR

District : MADURAI

State : TAMILNADU

Area Name of the Village

Survey No. Sub - Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

2

3

6

4

5

11

NO.47.SEKΚΙΡΑΤΤΙ

83

0

00

40

83

16

0

02

40

80

1B1

0

00

50

80

0

02

00

1A

0

82

80

9B

04

10A

82

0

01

48

76

01

05

71

0

50

7A

00

71

10

0

02

6A1

71

4B

01

20

0

40

71

14

0

01

71

12

0

00

82

1N

NO.46 . KAMBUR

136

0

12

02

01

136

0

22

1AE

136

0

01

50

1AC

136

1AG

02

50

0

40

0

00

139

1A28 2372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

District : MADURAI Taluk: MELUR 1

2

139

4A No. 4 KAMBUR

136

5A

136

5C

5D

136

2 NO.48 . KESAMPATTI

631

632

2

3

633

[PART II-SEC . 3( i) ] State: TAMILNADU 4

5

0

04

55 0

01

60

01

0

32 0

00

50 0

04

75 0

26

56 0

04

53

District : MADURA!

Taluk : MADURAI SOUTH

1

2

3

53

NO.12.SAMBAKUDI

7B

53

7A

53

5

53

6A

51

1A

28

51

Tajuk : THIRUMANGALAM

State : TAMILNADU - 4

5

6 0

30

01

0

00

80

70 0

00

0

03

30 0

01

30 0

01

20

District : MADURAI

1

2

3

19

1C3 NO.11.DHARMATHUPATTI

19

1C5 State : TAMILNADU 4

5

6 0

02

.00 0

02

00 [ F.No. R-25011 /29/2004- OR. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1859.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का आ 3147 तारीख 7 दिसम्बर, 2004 जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 11 दिसम्बर, 2004 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, (जिसे भारत सरकार के राजपत्र तारीख 18 जून, 2005 में प्रकाशित शुद्धिपत्र संख्या का आ 2140 तारीख 16 जून, 2005 द्वारा संशोधित किया गया था) द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचनाओं की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख क्रमशः 1 मार्च, 2005 एवं 13 सितम्बर, 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;

2373

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दीहै ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइप बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम कीधारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकरा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पत्र सं आर-31015/7/2003-ओ आर-II दिनांक 25-11-2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शर्तों के अध्यधीन सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला

तहसील: जयपुर

राज्य: राजस्थान

: जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

क्रम. सं.

गाँव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

खसरा सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर

4

2

3

5

6

9

0

02

49 1. सीतापुरा

0

3

15

86

8

0

15

77

5

0

02

58

7

0

19 42

[फा. सं. आर-31015/54/2004-ओ. आर. - II ] ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th March , 2006

S. O. 1059.-Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3147 , dated the 7th December , 2004 , issued under sub - section( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 11th December , 2004 (which was amended vide number S.O. 2140 dated the 16th June, 2005 , published in the Gazette of India dated 18th June , 2005 ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying -pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the State of Gujarat to Delhi through Mundra- Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

2374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notifications were made available to the public on the 1st March, 2005 and 13th September, 2005 respectively ;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section(4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration, in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter no . R- 31015/7/03 - OR- II dated 25-11-2004 .

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : JAIPUR

District : JAIPUR

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Sr. No.

Khasara No.

Hectare Are

Name of the Village

Sq.mtr. 1

4

2

3

5

6

9

0

1. SITAPURA

02 49

3

0

15- 86

8

0

15 77

5

0

02 58

0

7

42

19

[F. No. R- 31015/54/2004- O.R. -II ]

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .

2375

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च , 2006

का. आ. 1060.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कड़ा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 3411 तारीख 23 सितम्बर, 2005, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 24 सितम्बर , 2005 , में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 27 अक्तूबर, 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्वय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पत्र सं. आर 31015/7/03 ओ.आर- II दिनांक 25/11/2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शर्तों के अध्यधीन , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 2376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

अनुसूची

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( i) ) राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला

: जयपुर

तहसील: जयपुर

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम. सं.

3

2

1

140 1. हिम्मतपुरा

172

141

171

170

169

33 2. मूण्डियापुरोहितान

12

49

50

54

31 3. मूण्डियारामसर

33

22

20

12

11

13/413

9 4. सीतापुरा

8

5 5. जयसिंहपुराकांकडझेदा

4

2/171

17 6. किशोरपुराकांकडोदा

16

10 7. नारीकावास

30

28

33

34 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

5

6

4

21

33 0

12

01

0

28

17

0

79 0

27

22

16

0

29

12

0

19 0

00

26 0

01

0

78

04

0

00

51

02

52 0

00

68 0

51

01

0

41 0

03

0

01

83

26

06

0

00

01

0

07

0

82

00

50 0

0

14

02

0

05

01

00

71 0

26

00

0

75 0

00

0

46

00

30 0

01

81

10

0

12

02

0

13 0

38

84

07

0

26

00

0

45(स.रास्ता)

93 0

34

47 (स.चारागाह)

455 8. सारना चौड़

456

54 9. भूधरपुरा

55

56

62

61

63

64

65

65

12

0

76

29

0

07 0

02

78

00

0

20

09 0

40 0

11

00

20 0

39

24

0

0

07

19

20

00

0 2377

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

जिला

: जयपुर तहसील: जयपुर

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्रम. सं.

3

2

1

90 9. भूधरपुरा (जारी...)

89

98/123

86

85

81

3 (जे.डी.ए. चारागाह) 10. लालचन्दपुरा

275/1/1 11. बावड़ी

275/1/2

275/1/3

42

4.8

50

52

60/2

63(जे.डी.ए. झरड़ा)

65

68

69/2

84/1

78(जे.डी.ए. नाला)

74 12. सिंवार

723

662

652

186

187

185

185/1

185/2

88

85

84

76

77

68

63

62

64

220

61

221 (जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)

227 643 GI /2006-20

राज्य : राजংল

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर एयर

4

5

6

0

70

0

32

00

0

19

0

21

00

24

00

14

0

01

0

9.6

06

45

0

}

27

0

01

0

76

00

01

0

08

0

00

97

0

51

00

0

00

30

01

0

13

76

00

14

88

01

16

01

04

0

02

86

16

08

90

02

0

42

03

01

0

47

0

10

68

06

27

CC

13

ว

02

05

0

0

20

00

0

02

85

0

65

19

0

26

37

37

78

0

16

05

0

68

04

0

65

12

0

0

10

51

0

60

01

0

11

20 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 13 , 2006.PHAI GON 27.1977

2378

जिला : जलपर तहसील : जयपुर

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम. सं.

3

2

1

07

226(जे.डी.ए. सरता)

12. सिंवार (जारी ...)

225

122 13. चकबासड़ी

121

20/3 14. मंशारामपुरा

21/1

22

23/357

355 15. भांववा

367

364

322

381

383

384

393/1

43

00

37

00

0

20

0

54

13

00

0

66

05

88

01

26

53

46

82

00

32

24

59 0

55

57

16

17

16

05

393/2 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी.सह.क)

179

216

2

00

00

51 3

96 0

03

215/901

228

33

01

56

10

224/1051

269

108/851 16. सबरामपुरा

142

44

190

186

184

29

95

85

02

89

00

23

01

75

01

00

96

12

01

[ व.नं. ०३ : 075-54/2004 ओ. आर.-

गोस्वामी अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th March , 2000

5. 0. 1060 .-- Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3411 dated the 23 September, 2005, issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerala Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 24th September , 2005 , the Central Govemment declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the State of Gujarat to Deila through Mundra-Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Linited:

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification wore made available to the public on the 27th October, 2005;

[भाग खण्ड 3 (1)

2379

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government; And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire right of user therein

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of deciaration , in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances , subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter no. R- 31015/7/03 OR-II dated 25-11-2004.

SCHEDULE

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Tehsil : JAIPUR

Khasara No. No

Name of the Village

2

3

140 1. ΗΙΜΜΑTPURA

172

141

171

170

169

33 2. MUNDIYA PUROHITAN

12

49

50

54

31 3. MUNDIYA RAMSAR

33

22

20

12

11

13/413

9 4 SITAPURA

5 JAISINGHPURA KANKRODA

2/171

17 6. KISHORPURA KANKRODA

16

10 Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

5

6

4

0

33

21

12

0

01

28

0

17

27

79

0

22

0

16

29

12

0

0

00

19

26

01

0

78

0

04

00

51

0

52

0

02

68

00

0

01

51

0

41

03

0

83

0

01

26

06

0

0

01

00

82

07

50

00

0

02

01

00

0

75

00

46

00

0

01

0

30 2380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUN 27 , 1927

3

2

1

30 7. NARIKAWAS

28

33

34

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

6

5

4

10

0

81

02 12

0

38

0

13

07

84

0

26

0

00

45( G / L Cart Track)

93

0

34

47(G / L Pasture)

455 8. SARNA CHOD

456 9. BHUDARPURA

54

55

56

62

61

63

64

65

90

89

98/123

86

85

81 10. LALCHANDPURA

12

0

65

0

76

29

0

02

07

78

0

00

0

20 09

0

11

40

0

20

00

0

24 39

07 19

C

00

0

20

0

00

70

0

01

32

0

00 19

21

00

0

24

00

0

0

01

14

0

00

96

3( J.D.A Pasture)

275/1/1 11. BAVADI

06

0

45

275/1/2

275/1/3

42

48

50

52

60/2 01

27

0

0

00

76

0

01

08

0

00 97

0

00 51

0

30

00

63( J.D.A . Jharda)

65

68

69/2

84/1 0

01

13

0

00

76

0

14 88

16

0

01

0

01

04

78(J.D.A.Nala)

74

723 12. SINWAR

662

652

186

187

185

185/1

185/2

88 0

02

86

0

08 16

0

02 90

0

42

03

0

01

47

0

10 68

0

06

27

0

13

00 2381

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

[भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2

3

85

84

76

77

68

63

62

64

220

61

221(J.D.A. Cart Track)

227 12. SINWAR ( Contd ...)

226(J.D.A . Cart Track)

225

122 13. CHAK BASADI

121

20/3 14. MANSHA RAMPURA

20/1

22

23/357

356 15. MANCHAWA

357

364

382

381

383

384

393/1

393/2(P.W.D Road)

179

216

215/901

228

224/1051

269 16. SABRAMPURA

108/861

142

144

190

186

184 4

6

5

0

02

05 0

00 20 0

02

85 0

19 65 0

26

37 0

37

78 0

16 05

04

0

68 0

12

65 0

10 51

01

0

60 0

20 11 0

01

07

43

14

0

0

00

37

00 20 0

0

00 54

00

13 0

0

06

78 0

05 88 0

26

01 0

44 53

46

04

0

0

00 82 0

32 89

24

59 0

57

0

55

17

16 0

16

05

0

00 62 0

0

51

00

03 96 0

01

0

33

10

0

66 0

29 95 0

02 85

00

0

89

01

0

23

75 0

01

0

00

96 0

12

01

[F. No. R- 31015/54/2004- O.R. - II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .

2382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006- PIZALCUN 282

नई दिल्ली. 16 मार्च, 2006

का. आ. 1051.- तेञ्ट्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) ( जिये इसमें शिक अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अमेज सारी की गई भएर के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 3:52 हरीश رسة 2004, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख क्रमशः १ दिसम्बर, 2004 में प्रीतीद्वारे उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूनि में सुखा दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद हमके माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन विछान को प्रयोजन के लिए के अधिका अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतिथी जजता को तारीख 25 जनवरी २००७. जे अध करा दी गई थी :

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उपवास को रिपोर्ट ने दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार में, अब रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्न और वह हो वाले पह कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेशित है विनिश्चत किया है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 5 की उम्र (1 ) द्वारा प्रदक्ष हशविलयों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में दिजिर्दिष्ट भूके में पाइ‌पलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए. यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकारहरु घोषणा के प्रकाशन को तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पत्र नं. आर 31015/7/03 ओ.आर- दिनांक 25/11/2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शर्तों के अध्यनीतिं युक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसुची

तहसीलः झज्जर

राज्यः हरियाणा

जिलाः झज्जर

श्रेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुसतिल संख्या

खसरा किला । संख्या हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर बाहमनोला

345

270

74

00 01

03

20

00

07

46

21

00

02

88

[फा. सं. जार-31015/36/ 2004 ओ,आर.- !!!

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव [ भाग खण्ड 3ⅱ) ]

2383

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

Now Delhi , the 16th March , 2006

S. 6. 1061. Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.0.3152 dated 10th December , 2004 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) . ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of india dated the 11th December , 2004, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline through Mundra -Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the State of Gujarat to Delhi by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 25th January, 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire right of user therein,

Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration , in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances , subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter no . R- 31015/7/03 OR- II dated 25-11-2004 .

SCHEDULE

Tehsil :JHAJJAR

District : JHAJJAR

State : HARYANA

Area Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustil No.

Hectare Are

Khasara / Killa No.

Square Metre

00 01

03

345

270

BAMANOLA

74

20

00 07 46

21

00

02 88

[F. No. R-31015/36/2004- O.R. - II ]

1. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .

2384

[ PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) | THE GAZETIE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2006

New Delhi - 110001 in terminating the services of Capt. R. Khosla , Ex. Pilot , Resident of A- 160 , Jalwayu Vihar, Sector 21. Noida ( UP ) 201301 w.c.f. 16-07-1998 is justified, valid and legal ? If not to what relief and benefit he is entitled ."

का. आ. 1062.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सहारा एअर लाइंस लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 24/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-2-2006 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल-11012/ 119/99- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 20th February, 2006

The workman applicant has filed claim statement. In his claim statement he has stated that he was appointed as a Pilot by the Sahara Airlines Limited with effect from 01-11-1994 . As an Ex . Air Force Officer , he was having nearly 2700 hrs . flying and Master Green Category and also holding Civil Flying Licence ( or ALTP ) . Due to bis hard work and accident free flying he was given commendation letter besides higher salary and perks vide letter number SIAL / HQ / PERS/ 95 / 1054 dated 13th November, 1995. After more than three and halfyears continous service Capt . R. Khosla received letter No. SIAL /HQ/PERS/98 / 468 dated 16-07-1998 terminating his services with immediate effect .

S.O. 1062. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 24/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , New Delhi - II now as showit in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Sahara Airlines Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 20-2-06 .

Capt. R. Khosla raised an industrial dispute under Section 2A of the ID Act , but the opposite party adopted intransigent attitude before the ALC ( C) . It was urged that Capt . R. Khosla was not a workman and the employer- employee relationship having ceased to exist . hence there was no dispute to be settled. In these circumstances the conciliation proceedings resulted in failure and the Central Government has made this reference under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) and 10 ( 2A) of the ID Act with the following terms of reference:

[No. L- 11012/119/99 - IR ( C - 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer

"Whether the action of the Chief Controller, Sahara Airlines Ltd. , 7th Floor. Amba Deep Building. 14, Kasturba Gandhi Marg . Connaught Place . New Delhi - 110001 in terminating the services of Capt . R. Khosla . Ex -Pilot. Resident ofA - 160. Jalwayu Vihar. Sector 21 , Noida ( UP) -201301 w.e.f. 16-07-1998 is justified . valid and legal ? If not to what relief and benefit he is entitled."

I. D. No. 24/2000

In the matter of:---

Captain R. Khosla . R/ O A- 160, JalwayuVihar, Sector-21. Noida (UP) -201301

VERSUS

M/s . Sahara Airlines Limited, 7th Floor. Amba Deep Building . 14. Kasturba Gandhi Marg . New Delhi - 110001 .

There are two categories of Pilots working with the opposite party viz . those like Capt . R. Khosla with an Air Force background and others like Capt . GPS Grewal who were Civilian Pilots throughout their career. Since Capt . R. Khosla was excellent in his professional skills . as determined by impartial foreign experts like Capt . R. Landowsky, he became the victim of petty jealousy by the group of Civilian Pilots . Deliberately Capt. R. Khosla was not considered for the position of Commander and it was perhaps decided to bring him down a peg or two to teach him a lesson . This kind of negative feeling between the two groups n he easily seen from the complaints letter dated 10-03-1998 to the opposite party .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 119/ 99 - IR( C - 1 ) : Central Government Dt . 27-1-2000 has referred the following point for adjudication..

The point runs as under :-

Capt. R. Khosla was served with a Memorandum of charges on 05-06-1998 and also placed under suspension with immediate effect . The charges were completely vague and lacking in particulars regarding date , time and place exact language used and against whom and who had reported the matter to the authoritics . As such Capt R. Khosla asked for necessary particulars vide his letter dated 06-06-1998. After a lapse of about two weeks , he "Whether the action of the Chief Controller. Sahara Airlines Ltd. , 7th Floor. Amba Deep Building. 14. Kasturba Gandhi Marg . Connaught Place .

2385 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

received letter dated 20-06-1998 which may be described as second memorandum of charges . It was stated that the opposite party had conducted a preliminary inquiry and increased the ambit of his alleged misconduct to 4 separate charges ofusing derogatory and abusive language against the Company itself along with his seniors . But the copy of the preliminary report was not given to Capt . R. Khosla , even though the nature of charges has been considerably enlarged from the memorandum dated 05-06-1998.

Capt. R. Khosla submitted his explanation to the second show cause notice vide letter dated 25-06-1998 .

the Inquriy Committee Capt . Nilesh Guha and Capt . Atul Mehata have made patently false statements that they made themselves available to Capt. Khosla in connection with the Departmental Inquiry held on 10-07-1998 . Under normal circumstances their presence would be recorded by the Inquiry Committee in the proceedings and also there would be an endorsement that Capt. Khosla had declined to examine the witnesses and get it authenticated by Capt. Khosla himself. In fact both these witnesses as well as Shri Jaskirat were never made available for cross examinationby Capt. Khosla.

Subsequently an Inquriy Committee was formedto inquire into the charges of misconduct by the complainant on 02-07-1998 but Capt . R. Khosla was formally ordered by Capt. Grewal on 01-07-1998 itself to be present at 1100 hours on 06-07-1998 for the said inquiry.

There is obvious contradiction between paras 6 and 7 of the Inquiry proceedings , when the Inquiry Committee states that the complainant specifically asked for these witnesses to be cross examined and immediately thereafter confirms that the complainant did not ask for the appearance of any witness .

Capt. GPSGrewal , GM Operations ( N) who issued both the letter dated 05-06-1998 and 20-06-1998 and also placed Capt . R. Khosla under suspension was a member ofthe Inquiry Committee . Capt . R. Khosla was naturally apprehensive about the biased attitude of Capt . Grewal and specifically objected to his being a member of the Inquiry Committee, but the objection was brushed aside and the said officer has signed the findings and conclusions of the Inquiry Committee , causing grave prejudice to the workman .

Capt .Khosla was not given any opportunity to make a statement or to examine witnesses in his defence . Prosecution witnesses except Shri Sanjay Kumar did not affirm their statements personally and three of these witneses Capt. Nilesh Guha, Capt. Atul Mehata and Mr. Jaskirat were not made available for cross examination by Capt . Khosla . The proceedings have been completed withundue haste, behind the back of the complainant and with the preconceived idea of toeing the line of management to find Capt . Khosla guilty of the charges alleged against him.

Capt . Khosla was alleged to have committed grave acts of misconduct. Hence the inquiry committee should have conducted itself impartially. But they have acted in violation of natural justice and even expressed their opinion that the charges have not been disproved by Capt. Khosla ignoring the basic norm that he is presumed to be innocent and the burden of proving the charges rests entirely with the management .

The memorandum of charges before the Inquiry Committec consisted of two charges for using unparliamentarily language against Capt. SPS Sandhu , and one charge of using abusive language against senior management . These charges are also vague , nebulous . non - specific , lacking in particulars about the precise language used, dates and places of occurrence and names of the senior management and also not enumerated as a misconduct in the Standing Orders of the Company (Glaxo Laboratories Case : ( 1983 ) Lab. IC 1909 (SC) . As such they do not afford a reasonable opportunityto Capt . R. Khosla to offer his defence of the charges alleged against him.

Surprisingly during the proceedings of the Inquiry Committee which met only on 06-07-1998 the case for the management was presented by Shri A.K. Trehan . Advocate, whereas Capt. Khosla was forced to defend himself personally and he was not allowed representation by legal counsel , or any qualified officer .

The Inquiry Committee only recorded the statement of one witness , Shri Sanjay Kumar and all the remaining witnesses did not record statements personally, but only their letters / complaints submitted earlier were taken on record and they did not affirm before the inquiry the statements made by them earlier in those letters/ complaints .

There were no proceedings ofthe Inquiry Committee after06-07-1998 in the presence of Capt . R. Khosla . The subsequent portions of the proceedings have been fabricated later , including the findings and conclusions of

The Inquiry Committee proceedings were not given tothe complainant for showing cause against the findings and conclusions of the Inquiry and the evidence on which it was based. The proceedings have been produced for the first time during the conciliation proceedings . It is seen that the findings are completely perverse and based on no evidence or insufficient evidence . The charges contained in the memorandum of charges are lacking in particulars, witnesses have not been examined directly by the Committee, witnesses were not made available for being cross examined. Capt. Khosla was not properly represented and he was not asked to make a statement or produce defence witnesses . Also Capt . GPS Grewal ,GM Operations (N) was made a member of the Inquiry Committee even though he was extremely biased and personally responsible for issuing the letter dated 05-06-1998 and 20-06-1998 containing memorandum of charges and also placing Capt . Khosla under suspension even before conducting the preliminary inquiry. This has caused grave prejudice to the complainant more so because Capt . GPS 643 G1/2006-21 2386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

Grewal was incharge of the operations division and not competent under the Rules and Regulations of the Company to issuc memoranduin ofcharges of place Capt . Khosla under suspension vide letter dated 05-06-1998 . Incidentaly the power to suspend cannot be presumed it must be an express term in the contract of service or authorized by the Standing Orders . By Making Capt. Grewal as member, the Inquiry was reduced to a mockery and idle ceremony because of the biased attitude of the officer , which is obvious from the non - application of mind before issuing letter dated 05-06-1998 .

The proceeding of the Enquiry were conduced in the presence of Capt . Khosla only on 6-7-98 and since there were no further sittings he was under the bonafide impression that the Enquiry had been aborted . The witnesses sought by him were not produced for cross- examination , he was not asked to make a statement if he wished to do so. nor was he allowed to produce defence witnesses . Patently false statements have been obtained from Capt . Guha and Capt. Mehta that their presence was not desired by Capt. Khosla during the Enquiry proceedings which were "held on 10 July 98 " Capt . Khosla was also never given a copy of the proceedings; or asked to give his version or explanation of the Findings and Conclusions of the Enquiry Committee.

Surprisingly, after receiving the report of the Enquiry Committee. the Opposite Party did not proceed to the logical conclusion by issuing second show cause notice against the proposed punishment . But his services were terminated vide letter No. SIAL/HO/PERS / 98 / 468 dated 16-07-1998.

The termination of services is not a discharge simpliciter, but awarded as a cloak for awarding the punishment of dismissal which could not have been awarded for the extre ely trivial charges of using un- parliamentary language against Capt. Sandhu twice , and absive language against so -called senior management . The opposite party has also admitted during the conciliation proceedings the charge -sheet was issued and was proved by the subsequent DE and the disciplinary authority thereafter on that report took the required action .

It will be appreciated that there are two distinct powers with the opposite party to terminate the services ofan employee or to impose punishment for misconduct . One is the power to sever the employer - employec relationship simpliciter and in the second case to impose punishment on the ens over after holding Disciplinary Inquiry into the charges of misconduct . In the present case , the alleged misconduct of Capt. Khosla constitutes the foundation for nerminating his service and is obviously punitive in character, especially in a restrictive professional environment ofa pilot in a Commercial Airline . Therefore . the requirement of a complete , legal and effective inquiry is mandatory even though the termination may have been effected under the relevant standing orders . It is submitted that the termination of service of Capt Khosla is a colorable

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] exercise of the power vested in the management and this Hon'ble Tribunal has got ample jurisdiction to go into all the circumstanees leading to the termination of service. and determine whether in substance and reality the terinination order has been passed on account of the alleged misconduct.

In accordance with Section 2 (oo) of the ID Act retrenchment means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever . The case of Capt. Khosla does not fall under the exclusionary clauses ( a) to ( c ) of Section 2 (00) , hence it is obviously falling under the definition of retrenchment and covered by the contract of service according to which one month's notice was mandatory, or one month's pay in lieu of notice was to be paid or tendered to Capt. Khosla . It is also covered under Section 25F of the ID Act according to which one month's pay in lieu of notice or notice giving reasons was to be given statutorily, along with compensation which is computed as equivalent to 15 days average pay for every completed year of continuous service . What has happened in the present ease is a complete travesty ofjustice . Firstly there is a frace of an inquiry, without physically and directly recording the statements of witnesses not allowing Capt Khosla to be represented properly to make a statement or produce witnesses in his defence, arriving at the findings on the basis of opinion that Capt . Khosla failed to disprove the charges the charges and wholly insufficient evidence or even no evidence in respect of charges which are completely vague and lacking in particulars.

But the irony is that there is no punishment awarded to Capt . Khosla . Still the suspension was not revoked . Conveniently he was ought to be inflicted with termination of service . From the stage of the first memoranduru of charge dated 05-06-1998 , the actions of the opposite party have been completely lacking in bona fides bercit of objectivity and in violation of natural justice , besides statutory safeguards under Section 25F of the ID Act with the single motivation to inflict maximum damage and harassment to the complainant . As the charges by themselves were quite trivial in nature and it would be illogical and reprehensible to award the punishment of dismissal which would be gravely disproportionate to the gravity of the offences charged, more so due to the previous good conduct and clean record of the complainant . So it was decided to achieve the same object by issuing the letter dated 16-07-1998 . It is pointed out that the Hon'ble Supreme Court set aside the order of dismissal on charges of abusing some other worker and an officer of the employer on the ground that punishment was shockingly disproportionate and no reasonable employer would ever impose in like circumstances the punishment of dismissal and victimization or unfair labour practice could well be inferred from the conduct of the employer . (Ved Prakash Gupta v/s. Deltron Cables Ltd. 1984 Lab . IC 658 ( SC ) .

Unfortunately the said letter which was dispatched by registered post to the residence of the officer was not accompanied by payment of one month salary in lieu of [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2387

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

legal notice or the compensation which is necessary under Section 25F ( a) and (b ) of the ID Act . in fact the opposite party actually admitted during the conciliation proceedings that the cheque for one month salary in lieu of the legal notice was kept in the personnel department of the company but this does not constitute actual payment or even tender of payment since mere readiness to pay on the part of the employer is not sufficient compliance and there must be either offer or tender or actual payment to the workman concerned .

Since the letter dated 16-07-1998 is not complying with the mandatory provisions of Section 25F ID Act it is patently illegal , void ab initio and inoperative and the complainant Capt . R. Khosla should be deemed to be in continuous service of the opposite party with entitlement for back wages and other consequential benefits Also the letter dated 05-06-1998 has to be quashed because Capt. GPSGrewal who was incharge of the operations department was not competent to issue the same and suspend the complainant from duty and also the disciplinary proceedings for alleged misconduct have not resulted in any punishment to the officer.

In view of the submissions made hereinabove Capt . Khosla is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages with effect from 16-07-1998 . It is pointed out that Capt. Khosla has remained continuously unemployed since his services were terminated by the opposite party and he has not taken up employment with any other private or public agency or department . It is also pertinent thatsince Capt . Khosla has not flown Boeing Aircraft for nearly 20 months , his flying licence will need to be updated and endorsed as suitable for flying Boeing Aircraft at the cost ofthe opposite party. In this connection the principles laiddown in the following cases will apply squarely to the facts of the present reference :

1. State of Bombay v/ s . Hospital Mazdoor Sabha (1960) I LLJ 251 ( SC)

2. State Bank of India v/ s . N. Sundaramoney 3. Mohanlal v/s . Bharat Electronics Ltd. ( 1981 ) 4. The Punjab Land Reclamation Corporation Ltd. v/s. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Ors .

Itisrespectfully submitted that the workman is also entitled to the following dues which have been wrongfully withheld by the opposite party in respect the period of employment prior to his termination from service and the lastpayment received was Rs . 41,857/ - towards pay for themonth ofJune , 1998 against Rs . 1,01,217/- for the month of May, 1998 , consequent to his being placed under suspension with effect from 05-06-1998 vide letter ofthe same date:

(a) For salary for the month of

June, 1998 (due to short payment ofRs . 41,857) only against salary for the month ofMay, 1998 which was actually Rs . 1,01 , 217 -52, 241.03

-1,69,280.00 (b) Salary from 01-07-1998 to 16-07-1998 ( at the same rate as last pay drawn for May, 1998 e.g. Rs . 1.01.217 .

--85,325,00 (c) Incentive Pay for the period 01-04-1998 ( at the same rate as incentive pay for the period 01-01-1998 to 31-03-1998)

-38,325,00 (d) Incentive pay for the period 01-07-1998 to 15-08-1998 (including period of mandatory notice).

-55,080,77 (e) Encashment of Earned Leave from 01-11-1994 to 16-07-1998 (20 days leave for each year of service . Last basic salary drawn Rs . 15,552 per month.

(f) Provident Fund from 01-11-1994 to 16-07-1998 with Employer's contribution (at the rate of Rs. 12,000/ - per annum plus interest) . Total

=4.59.348.80 Itissubmitted that the workman Capt . Khosla will be entitled to the relief of reinstatement in service with backwages and direction for updating of his flying category of the cost of the opposite party as well as payment of various amounts mentioned in Para 24 above in respect of the period immediately prior to his illegal and void termination from service with effect from 16-07-1998 .

The respondents have filed written statement. In the written statement it has been stated that the applicant isguilty of Suppressio - veri and falsio suggestion .He has not come to this Hon'ble Tribunal with true and correct facts and has forged and hammered the true facts just to make out a false and frivolous case. The applicant is guilty ofmis- representations and concealment of material facts . The claim/applications calls dismissal on this score only.

That the application contains allegations which are bogus , wholly vexatious even to the knowledge of applicant and infact frivolous litigation is sought to be initiated by misusing under the garb of ingenious drafting of application and creating mischief of litigation by misusing the proves of the Court merely for the purposes ofharassing the respondent by Sham and shady actions. The frivolous and vexatious plaint calls dismissal on this very ground only.

Thatthe application is false even to the knowledge ofthe applicant. The applicant has made false allegations. which are false to his own knowledge , and the application has been filed with malafide intention to harass and pressurize the answering respondent .

2388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii ) | That the application is not maintainable , as the applicant Hon'ble Tribunał with clean hands and has suppressed true facts and to mis - lead this Hon'ble Tribunał by concocting the fabricating story.

He by the nature of employment was employed for discharging duties , which are of managerial and in administrative capacity . Therefore as per statue he is not workman and thus this Hon'ble Tribunal cannot adjudicate upon the present reference.

Thatthe applicant prior to filing a present application had been indulging inpressure tactics with sham and bogus allegations and when the respondentdid not succumb to the pressure tactics applicant has filed the present application on faise and frivolous grounds. All the alleged conflict are created in air by the applicant and now by filing the present case he is guilty of Commodum ex injuria sua memo habere debet and cannot be permitted the same. The application for dismissal on this very score .

That the present application is otherwise not maintainable in view of the fact that the services of applicant have been terminated after holding an enquiry into the charges of misconduct communicated to him . The enquiry has been conducted by following the prescribed procedure and there are no lacunae in the procedure followed for holding the enquiry including the ultimate punishinent of dismissal from service by the opposite party.

That the Hon'ble Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to try and adjudicate upon the present matter. The applicant has submitted that he comes under the ambit of "Workman " as defined under 2( s) of the Industrial Dispute Act of 1947. It is respectfully submitted that the Complainantdoes not fall under the ambit of workman as he does not qualify the criteria laid down under section 2(s)( reproduced below) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act 1947.

That the present application is also not maintainable . as the applicant has already been given ample opportunity to explain his point of view with regard to the specific charges levelled against him . He has been provided with a charge shect laying down specific charges , he has been given opportunity to examine witnesses . The enquiry has been held by following the prescribed procedure and therefore the applicant eannot be allowed to question the non -compliance of procedure for holding the enquiry at this stage .

REPLY ON MERIT

"Workman" means any person ( including and appreciation employed in any Industry to do any manual , unskilled, skilled , technical, operational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward whether the terms of employment be expressed or employed and for the purpose ofany proceeding under this Act in relation to an Industrial Dispute included any such person who has been dismissed or discharged or retrenched in connection with, or has a consequence of, that dispute , but does not include any such person .

(1 ) Who is subject to the Air Force Act- 1950 (45 of 1950) , or the Army Act 1950 (46 of 1950) , or the Navy Act , 1957 (62 of 1957 ) ; or

(2) Who is employed in the policy services or as anofficer or other employ of a prison , or

(3) Who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity or

That the first part of para - 1 relating to this joining Sahara Airlines Ltd. , and hence needs no comments on the same . With regards to second part of his statement that " due to hard work and accident free flying he was given commendation letter besides higher salary and perks" . This statement is wrong and false and thus denied . The Complainant was given a warning by Director General . CivilAviation vide his letter number 1-750/ 92 - L ( 2 ) dated 4th September, 1995 and he was warned to be more careful in future , which clearly proves that the statement of the Complainant i.e. " accident free flying" is a deliberated lic. (Appendix ' A' of the Application) . The letter No. SIAL : HQPERS: 95 : 1054 dated 13-11-1995 ( Annexure ' of the Application) clearly stipulates that the review of salary structure was " a unilateral structure " of the Management and it was not based on the alleged hard work of the applicant . The third part of the statement relating to his termination of services is his statement of fact and therefore requires no reply.

(4) Who being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding Rs . 1600 per mensam or exercises , either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him, function mainly of a managerial nature.

The contents of para - 2 is a statement of fact and therefore requires no reply from the respondent .

Since the applicant as has been admitted by him in the application was getting salary of more than One Lakh per month, his salary is much above the permissible limit of being a Workman under the Industrial Dispute Act . Therefore the instant application is liable to be rejected sod for all under the category of Workman as doressadan ! Dispute Act of 1947. Furthermore aepiam tu eres stated that he was co - pilot during the coplo eat with the respondent and thus was rospam tror at the decisions to be taken while flying.

With regard to the first part of this para relating to categories of pilots working with the opposite party it is a statement of facts and therefore requires no reply . However, with regards to second part of this para that the applicant was not considered for promotion as he had become a victim of petty jealousy by a group of civilian pilots and the same is wrong false and denied. The applicant has mischievously and intentionally not stated the full facts about the personal opinion of Capt . R. Landoski 2389 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

(Appendix B of the complaint) . In his letter dated 23rd April, 1996 Capt . R. Landoski had clearly stated with respect to SIA I am not in a position to set any crew allocation or recommend promotion . The applicant has not brought this fact to the notice of Hon'ble. Tribunal that he was not recommended for promotion as stated by Captain R. Landoski .

Guha and Capt . Atul Mehta were required to appear for cross questions by the applicant . The applicant refused to cross examine them . The statements of Capt . Nilesh Guha and Capt. Atul Mehta has been attached as Annexure I and J. He is misleading the Hon'ble Tribunal by stating that he was not given any opportunity to cross examine these witnesses . Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

That the contents of Para 4 are wrong false and thus denied. The charges were specific and there was no enlargement of such charges vide our memorandum dated 05-06-1998- as alleged by the applicant . In fact the charges levelled against the applicant were clarified later vide memorandum dated 01-06-1998 and no enlargement of charges was there. Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

That the contents of Para 12 are wrong , false and denied. The complainant refused to cross examine them. The statements of Capt . Nilesh Guha and Capt. Atul Mehta has been attached as Annexure 1 and J. He is misleading the Hon'ble Tribunal that they were not available for cross examination . The proceedings had been completed by the following prescribed procedure including giving ample opportunity to the applicant to answer the charges levelled against him as also cross examining witnesses . Therefore the allegation that the proceedings have been completed with undue haste etc. is totally void of any reasoning whatsoever. Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

The contents of para 5 are statement of facts and therefore requires no comments . The contents of Para 6 arewrong, false and denied. The applicant never objected to Captain GPS Grewal being a member of the inquiry committee. The argument that the applicant specifically objected to Grewal being a member is an after thought and is without any solid/true base. Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

That the contents of Para 13 are wrong. false and thus denied. The proceedings had been completed by the following prescribed procedure including giving opportune time to the applicant to answer the charges levelled against him as also cross examining witnesses . Therefore the allegations that the proceedings have been completed in violation of natural justice , is totally void of any reasoning whatsoever. Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

The contents of Para 7 are wrong , false and denied. Annexure D to the application will clearly show the charges levelled against applicant were clear and specific and were not vague , nebulous , non- specific etc. as alleged by the applicant . Anything stated contrary is denied in totality. The contents of Para 8 are wrong , false and denied. There was no Advocate namely A.K. Trehan with the opposite party at the time of holding the inquiry. The legal Advisor of the applicant was /is Shri S.K. Trehan and he never participated in the proceedings of the inquiry committee. Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

The contents of Para 14 are wrong , false and thus denied. The inquiry has been completed by following the prescribed procedure and therefore the allegation that the set procedure has not been adhered by the opposite party is thus denied . The applicant has simply made a vague allegation that the prescribed procedure has not been followed without specifying the Lucknow in the holding of the inquiry. The frivolous points now raised by the applicant about the procedure for holding the inquiry were never raised by him during the time the inquiry was going on . These are only after thoughts .

That the contents of Para 9 are wrong, false and denied. The persual of Annexure G and H attached with the application clearly show that the applicant himself had cross examined Capt . Romi Sharma and Shri Sethi during the inquiry. While on the end the applicant has attached the verbatim record of questioning/ answering the applicant/ witnesses as Annexure G and H to the application and in the same breath he is deliberately and intentionally misleading the Hon'ble Tribunal by stating thatthe statement of one witness was recorded . Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

That the'contents of Para 15 are wrong , false and thus denied . Capt . Guha and Capt . Mehta were called at the instance of the applicant during the inquiry proceedings held on 10th July, 1998. The applicant refused to cross examine them . The applicant himself has attached the statements of Capt . Guha and Capt . Mehta as Annexure I& J tohis complaint wherein Capt . Ghua and Capt .Mehta have stated that both of them made themselves available to the applicant in connection with the Departmental Inquiry but the applicant did not cross examine any one of them. Anything stated contrary is denied in totality .

That the contents of Para 10 are wrong , false and denied . At the instance of the applicant Capt . Nilesh Guha and Capt . Atul Mehta were required to appear for cross questioning by the applicant . The applicant refused to cross examine them . The statements of Capt. Nilesh Guha and Capt . Atul Mehta has been attached as Annexure I. and J on the one end . He is misleading the Hon'ble Tribunal that they were not available for cross examination. Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

That the contents of Para 16 are wrong . false and denied. After having established the charges against the applicant by holding an impartial , independent inquiry the services of the complainant were terminated. Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

That the contents of Para 11 are wrong, false and thus denied . At the instance of the applicant Capt . Nilesh 2390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

That the contents of Para 17 are wrong , false and thus denied. The charges were never of trivial nature but solid charges which were approved by holding a departmental inquiry against the applicant in which the applicant was given ample opportunityto give reasons why disciplinary actions should not be taken against him as also the applicant was given chance to cross examine the witnesses specifically asked for by him. Anything stated contrary is denied in totality.

The contents of Para 18 are wrong , false and thus denied. The inquiry was impartial , independent and the termination order was on account of charges proved against the applicant by the inquiry committee . The contents of Para 19 are wrong, false and thus denied.

The applicant has submitted that he comes under the ambit of " workman " as defined under section 2 ( s) of the ID Act , 1947. It is respectfully submitted that the applicant does not fall under the ambit of workman as he does not qualify the criteria laid down under section 2 ( s ) of the ID Act , 1947.

That the contents of Para 20 are wrong , false and thus denied . The applicant has been given ample opportunity to defend himself and the order of dismissal is neither unfair nor victimization of the applicant since the disciplinary has been taken after holding an independent and impartial inquiry.

The contents of Para 21 are wrong, false and thus denied . The opposite party has already written two letters Nos . SAL: HQ: PERS : 09 : 98 dated 28-09-1998 and SAL: HQ : PERS : 07 : 99 dated 5th July, 1999 advising the applicantto collect the dues from the management. In fact instead of collecting the dues the applicant is intentionally and mischievously taking up this case to the Hon'ble Tribunal . However, without prejudice to the rights of the respondent , management again through this written offers the applicant to collect his dues as stated in SAL : HQ : PERS : 09 : 98 dated 28-09-1998 and SAL : HQ : PERS : 07: 99 dated 5th July, 1999 from the office of the management.

The contents of Para 22 are wrong , false and thus denied . That the applicant prior to filing a present application had been indulging in pressure tactics with sham and bogus allegations and when the respondent company did not succumb to the pressure tactics the applicant has filed the present suit on false and frivolous grounds. All the alleged conflict are created in air by the applicant and now by filing the present case he is guilty of Commodum ex injuria sua memo habere debet and cannot be permitted the same. The complaint for dismissal of this very score .

The contents of Para 23 are statements of facts and thus we have no comments to offcer. The legal dues of the applicant are payable to the applicant and the opposite party are agreeable to pay the same. In fact the opposite party has already written two letters to the applicantto collect the same .

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] The contents of Para 25 are wrong, false and thus denied. Since the dismissal of the applicant has been ordered after holding an impartial and independent inquiry for the specific charges leveled against him, the said termination order is neither illegal nor void.

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras ofthe claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record .

It was submitted from the side of the workman that Annexure -D is the charge sheet of the respondents and three charges were framed against the workman. These charges are extracted as hereunder : ---

1. In the month of May , 1998 you had used the following filthy, obscene and unpleasant remarks against the Hon'ble Chief Controller:-- "Mr. Bose has no (.... unparliamentary language), he listens to that (.... unparliamentary language ) Sandhu , they are a bunch ofjokers sitting there . I am going to fix them. " This remarks was made on Capt . P.K. Dawar's flight in the cockpit while you were traveling as A.C.M.

2. On 2nd June, 1998 you commented the following infront ofG.M. Operations office , when a letter fromG.M. Operations was delivered to you . "If this letter is in connection with command training on B.737-200 , then you can tell Capt. Sandhu to(. unparliamentary language ) ." These remarks were made in the presence of Mr. Jaskirat Wazir, Senior Flight Despatcher and Mr. Romy Sharma , Trainee Pilot.

3. Again on 2nd June , 1998 while waiting to meet Hon'ble Chief Controller , it was observed by the H.C.C. Staff that you were talking ill of Sahara Airlines and the Senior inanagement. You had also used abusive language against some seniors of Sahara Airlines . This has been reported by Capt. H.S. Chopra,Commander Turbo Props and Mr. Sethi, P.A. to G.C.C. It was submitted that three lines of charges are dotted and un-parliamentary language has been written but the words which constituted un - parliamentary language has not been specifically mentioned . So it was not possible for the workman to give a comprehensive reply to the charges . It is obvious that the charge sheet is absolutely vague . This is a unique type of charge sheet .

It was submitted that the respondents have invented and innovated such charge sheet which is 2391 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

absolutely against the spirit of the principles of natural justice . It cannot be ascertained as to what filthy and abusive language has been used .

effectively exercise this right it is necessary that the examination in chief of the witnesses should be recorded in the presence of the party against whom the . deposition is made . An inquiry wherein , examination in chief has been recorded in the absence of the person charged though he is allowed to cross examine the witnesses , cannot be said to have been held in accordance with the rules of natural justice and order passed in such an inquiry is liable to be set aside under Article 226 of the Constitution . ( S) AIR 1957 SC 882 and AIR 1961 SC 1070 and AIR 1961 SC 1623 , Foll . "

It was submitted that the effective opportunity was not afforded to the workman to cross examine the witnesses as the statement of witness was not taken before the workman , their previous statement was relied upon . The inquiry stands vitiated in view of this law.

It was further submitted that in case some observations were made against co -employee , Capt . Sandhu and Capt. B.K. Dewaris , at the worst , the workman used un - healthy language for his co -employee and it does not constitute in itself disobedient activity. The workman may have used harsh language for his co-employee. The estranged relation among the co- employee is not an act of disobedience , if some words are uttered under some provocation. In charge no . 3 it has been mentioned that the workman had used abusive language against some seniors of Sahara Airlines . That abusive has not been specifically mentioned even in the third charge. A language cannot be termed abusive and filthy until the words used are manifestly and expressely mentioned in the charge sheet .

It was further submitted that the Hon'ble Apex Court in 1963 II LLJ 452 has held that examination in chief should be recorded before the delinquent . The relevant portion is reproduced as hercunder:-

It was further submitted that this charge sheet is a vague charge sheet and no inquiry can be conducted if the charges themselves are vague . Inquiry is a structure which is irrected on the foundation stone of a charge sheet . If the charge sheet itself is vague no wholesome structure can be raised . In case the foundation is week the entire structure is to collapse if it is tested on the crucible of the principles of natural justice.

It was further submitted that the workman was not supplied with the documents of preliminary investigation. From perusal of the inquiry report it transpires that the evidence of witness was not taken before the workman .

"Besides , when evidence is recorded in the presence of the accused person there is no room for persuading the witness to make convenient statements and it is always easier for an accused person to cross examine the witness if his evidence is recorded in his presence . Hence the idea of recording statements of witnesses ex- parte and then producing the witnesses before the employce. concerned for cross examination after serving him with such previously recorded statements should be discouraged even in cases where the witnesses concerned make a general statement on the latter occasion that the statements already recorded correctly represent what they have stated. Unless there are compelling reasons to do so the normal procedure should be followed and all evidence should be recorded in the presence of the workman who stands charged with the commission of acts constituting misconduct . "

Inquiry in the instant case has been conducted in absolute abeyance and disregard of the settled principles of natural justice . It was submitted from the side of the respondents that this Tribunał is not sitting in appeal and it cannot substantiate its own views against the findings ofthe inquiry officer. This Tribunal while exercising the power ofjudicial review cannot normally substantiates its own conclusion .

It has been held in 1984-1 - LLJ - II that in case evidence is not recorded in the presence of delinquent employee and materials are gathered in the absence of the employee and such materials gathered are not communicated to the employee the concept of fair play is vitiated and principles of natural justice are violated in consequences . In the instant case the witnesses of the inquiry have submitted a report while preliminary investigation . That report was never supplied to the workman. The written statement of the witness was taken as éxamination in chief of those witnesses and the workman was asked to cross examine . So there is no examination in chief before the delinquent and the written statements of the witness given by them during preliminary investigation have been treated as examination in chief. Such trends violate principles of naturaljustice in view of 1984 -I -LLJ-II .

It has been held in AIR 1962 Punjab 496 that " A departmental inquiry conducted for the purpose of taking disciplinary action against a public servant is not an empty formality ; it is a serious proceeding intended to give the officer concerned a chance to meet the charge and to prove his innocence . The right of officer charged to cross examine the witnesses who gave evidence against him is a valuable right and in order to

It was also submitted from the side of the management that in a domestic inquiry strict and sophisticated rules of evidence under evidence act should not be made applicable . Even a delinquent can be held guilty on hearsay evidence if it has reasonable nexus and credibility. It is not the duty of Industrial Adjudicator to evaluate the evidence of the inquiry afresh . The sufficiency of evidence is beyond the scrutiny of Tribunal . My attention was drawn to AIR 1977 SC .

2392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

It isof course true that the Industrial Adjudicator is not the appellate forum and evidence should not be re- appreciated and it could not arrived at independent findings on the evidence . The Industrial Adjudicator has the power of judical review and it is not any appellate power.

It was submitted from the side of the workman that the disciplinary authority imposed punishment without personal hearing. It transpires from perusal of the inquiry proceedings that no show cause notice regarding proposed punishment was given. It was submitted that it is an essential feature of principles of natural justice . None should be condemned un- hcard . No order can be passed without hearing the other side. In the instant case the workman has not been heard before inflicting penalty. It was submitted that the inquiry stands vitiated on this count alone .

It was submitted from the side of the management thatthis Court lacks inherent jurisdiction to try and adjudicate upon the present matter since the applicant is not a workman under Section 2 (s) of the ID Act , 1947. The workman applicant was working in Supervisory and Managerial capacity and his last drawn salary inclusive of all perks and benefits was Rs . 1,01 , 217 per month. He was granted various other fringe benefits like fresh air travel, medical facilities for self and family members . He has to take independent decision , control and supervision over co-pilot and other crew members of the Aircraft . By nature of his employment he was working in administrative capacity as such he does not fall within the ambit of a workman . This point was raised earlier and the P.O. has held that the duty of the workman was operational . His duty in truth and circumstance was operative . In the amended definition of Section 2 ( s ) . Operational duty has beentaken under the purview of workman's duty for the propose of the definition of the workman in the ID Act. This point cannot be raised as this point has been adjudicated upon after hearing both the partics in the interim proceedings and it has the effect of res -judicata or atleast constructive resjudicata .

It was submitted from the side of the workman that ambigous and loose language in the chargesheet indicates thatthe respondents had prejudged his guilt and the inquiry was simply a device and formality for termination of his services . The contents in the instant chargesheet are indeed vague .

It has been held in a catena of decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court and of the Hon'ble High Court that the charges should accurately and precisely state whether the act of commission and omission constituted misconduct . In the instant chargesheet dotted lines have made it absolutely vague so the workman could not reply to the charges comprehensively. The respondents have made use of abbreviations . Un -parliamentary language used in the chargesheet is itself vague and incomprehensive . It gives impression that the respondents have taken the guilt of the workman as a foregone

[PART II-S3 ( ii) ]

conclusion. The chargesheet should be framed in such a language which is commonly understood and which is in common usages . The instant chargesheet is not precise in terms . Loose and vague terms just as un - parliamentary language and derogatory remarks have been used . It does not convey in the correct sense the charges brought out against the employce .

It has been held in 1992 ( 2) LLJ 369 that :-- " If particulars of misconduct are not incorporated in the charge sheet , then it will not be considered and the entire inquiry will become a farec in which principles of natural justice are not complied with . In such cases the dismissal order is liable to be quashed. "

It has been further held in AIR 1966 SC 324 that :-- " It is the duty of the employer to communicate to the delinquent employee not only the precise nature ofcharges but also the documents if any upon which charges are based

valid: the c its

on the delinquent is not a has been conducted taking tion stone but the charge sheet vague language and lacking in ed from the side of the workman that conducted in hottest hest . It has been only on two dates and the witness summoned man were not presented by the respondents . isal of the inquiry it becomes quite obvious that iry has been concluded hastily on two dates and the man was not issued notice for personal hearing. The ateof the delinquent is a little defiant as is ntanifest from his replics . He has called the charges nebulous and he has stated that he no longer wants to cross examine any other witness . There is a slight colour of insub- ordination in luis attitude and behaviour of the delinquent . He is a proficient Pilot no doubt and he has received commendation for his excellent performance.

However the conduct and attitude of the delinquent employee is not a subject matter of the inquiry and it is not a matter of consideration by this Tribuna !. This Tribunal is only to consider whether the inquiry has been conducted accordingto the principles of natural justice or not. There is no legal evidence in the inquiry. Sufficient opportunities have been given to the respondents and they have indeed adduced evidence but they have not tried to explain the un- parliamentary language used by the delinquent and derrigotary remarks made by the workman. As such the chargesheet remains vague. Vagueness has not been explained away by evidence in the inquiry proceedings and ithas not been explained away during the deposition ofthe management witness. The defects of the charge- sheet have been highlighted . Inquiry has no doubt been conducted hastily. The delinquent was suspended so lic should have been given sufficient time and opportunity [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

to cool down. Hurriedly doing is not unwise and delay doing is not wise. An inquiry can be conducted even during one day. Delay and several dates of the inquiry cannot make it valid. But in the facts and circumstances the respondents have acted hastily and hastily doing is never wise.

The respodents have filed application . Praying of for additional evidence for arriving to definite conclusion . Order has been passed on the application . I thought it necessary to mention this application in this award. The case is pending since 2000. The parties have been given two years time to lead evidence and several adjournments have been granted . As per provisions ID cases should bedecided in one year. This case has taken five complete years . Application for further evidence has been rejected . Order has been passed on the application .

It was further submitted by the respondents that a proper inquiry has been held and principles of natural justice have been followed . This Court cannot re- appreciate the evidence recorded during the course of inquiry.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that inquiry has been held for a serious misconduct including derogatory remarks about seniors . But that derogatory remarks and abusive language has not been specifically mentioned in the chargesheet itself.

It was further submitted that the management took the services of a lawyer during the proceedings of inquiry and the workman also requested that he should alsobe permitted to be represented by a lawyer but his application was rejected . The Inquiry Officer has acted as Presenting Officer . He cannot discharge dual duty. There is no proof that respondents took the help of a lawyer. In case they had taken services of a lawyer such a vague chargesheet would not have been framed by the respondents . There is no merit in this contention .

The workman has enumerated certain dues which have not been paid to him . He has demanded Rs . 4, 59 , 348.80. The workman applicant should file separate application for dues wrongfully withheld by the opposite party in respect of the period of employment prior to his termination from his services .

In the instant case only the reference is to be replied and order regarding dues cannot be passed . The applicant is advised to move application under Section 33 -C( 2) of the ID Act , 1947 so that his dues withheld may be computed in terms of money.

My attention was drawn to 1984 Lab IC 658. It has been held that dismissal is victimization in case inquiry has not been properly conducted .

Itwas further submitted that the charges are extremely lacking in material particulars . Termination is as a clock for awarding punishment of dismissal and in 643 GI/2006-22

2393

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

case inquiry is not set aside there would be complete travesty of justice.

Itwas further submitted by the workman that he has been victimized in view of jealousy with a group of Civilian Pilots having negative feeling against him . His performance has been taken to be very excellent . Civilian Pilots were not able to cope up with his performance so they cherised ill will . The chargesheet served on the workman is not valied charge sheet in view of 1983 Lab IC page 1909 SC .

Ittranspires from inquiry proceedings that he has beengiven opportunity to cross examine the witnesses and he has cross examined them . The witnesses summoned by him in defence were not cross examined by him, so it cannot be said that he has not been afforded opportunity for cross examination. There is no letter on record to show that he wanted to produce some witnesses in defence but such opportunity was not offered .

It is ture that sufficiency or aducacy of evidence is not to be considered by this Tribunal but what is not admissible in Evidence Act cannot be admissible in inquiry proceedings . Inquiry is a quasi judicial proceeding. The inquiry committee has relied upon the statement of witnesses who were not examined before the delinquent . Abusive and derogatory remarks have not been mentioned in the chargesheet . The workman has not been supplied a copy of the materials collected behind his back . The inquiry has been concluded in short shrift . These are the incidences which have made the inquiry an absolute farce . Principles of naturaljustice have not been observed . The workman applicant has been punished un- heard. No misconduct has been proved by the witness of the management . It is an inquiry of no evidence and inquiry should not be an empty formality. The inquiry stands vitiated on the grounds mentioned above . The laws cited by the respondents are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the instant case .

The reference is replied thus :-

The action of the Chief Controller , Sahara Airlines Ltd. , 7th Floor Amba Deep Building , 14, Kasturba Gandhi Marg , Connought Place , New Delhi - 110001 in terminating the services of Capt. R. Khosla , Ex . Pilot. Resident of A - 160 , Jalwayu Vihar, Sector : 21. Noida ( UP)-201301 w.e.f. 16-7-1998 is neither justified nor valid or legal . The workman is entitled to be reinstated with full back wages w.e.f. 16-7-1998 . In case of default the workman will be entitled to 10% interest per annum over the entire back wages .

Award is given accordingly.

Dated: 13-2-2006.

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer 2394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2006

RamMajhi , Cashier-cum- Clerk w. e. f. 19-12-1994 is legal and justified? If not . to what relief the said workman is entitled. "

का. आ. 1063. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 वः। 14 ) को धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीब , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरणः श्रम न्यायालय 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 48/1997 मेकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-2-2006 को गाप्त हुआ था ।

[चं० एल-12012/29/96- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 20th February, 2006

Theworkman applicant has filed clain statement . In his claim statement it has been stated that he was appointed on the post of peon on 29-01-1979 . That after 8 months ofjoining his services the Bank called for original caste certificate from him . The original caste certificate of the applicant was lost . So he informed the bank that his photostat of caste certificate is on the personal file and if there is any doubt the Bank may get this certificate verified to its satisfaction . That on 13-07-1980 a chargesheet was served on the workman that his caste certificate is forged . The workman replied that the Photostat copy of the caste certificate is with the management and its authenticity or otherwise may be inquired by the bank and he also informed the Bank that he was sending letter to his village for getting another duplicate caste certificate and he will deposit the same after receiving it .

S.O. 1063. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 48/ 1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Cum- Labour Court No. 2. New Dehli as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Punjab National Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Governacie on 20-2-2006.

That on 06-02-1982 caste certificate was obtained by his father bearing No. 381 and he deposited the same in 1982. The Bank in order to get the certificate verified wrote letter No. 442 dated 24-03-1982 to the District Padadhikari . The District Padadhikari replied to the aforesaid letter of thebank on 14-05-1982 that Shri Hare Ram Majhi . S /o . Shri R. D. Majhi is Scheduled Tribe certificate .

[No. L - 12012/29/ 96- IR( B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy:

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI

R.N. RAIM: Presiding Officer:

I.D. No. 48/1997

That the work man passed 10th, 12th and B. A. with the permission of the Bank and he appeared in the departmental examination of Clerk/Cashier and he was interviewed but he was not promoted and letterto District Padadhikari was issued by the Bank regarding his caste certificate and after receiving report from the District Padadhikari , Siwan he was discharged and promoted to the post of Clerk/ Cashier .

In the matter of:-

That on 23-09-1986 another chargesheet was issued to the workman that he has forged his caste certificate and the workman replied that he has not committed any forgery in the caste certificate.

Sh. Hare Ram Majhi , R/e Sitapuri . Part - II , PO Palam. New Delhi -15.

VERSUS

The General Manaper, Punjab National Bank, AtaaRam House- 1. TolstoyMang. Nev. Deiki

AWARD

That on 19-10-1994 the Regional Manager sent a notice to the workman regarding proposed punishment of dismissal . The workman appeared for personal hearing on 26-10-1994 and proposal was placed before him that he was demoted from the post of Ciel/ Cashier and deputed on the post of peon and his 3 increments with cumulative effect are also withheld . The workman informed the respondents that he will challenge the inquiry proceedings in the Court as he belongs to Scheduled Tribe Community and will prove this fact before the Court so he asked the management to dismiss him without notice .

TheMonistry of Labour by its letter No. L - 120 12/29 / 96 -JR( B - JI ) Central Government Dtd. 04/09-04-1997 has refered the tallowing point for adjudication.

The point ruistas under: -

That on 04-01-1995 the workman appealedto the Zonal Manager but his appeal was not disposed af till 22-03-1995 . He again appealed to the Zonal Manager on 23-03-1995 and he was asked to appear for personal hearing on 04-04-1995.

"Whither the action of management of Punjab Natusantisuk in dismissing the services of Shri Hare 2395 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

He was again summoned by the Zonal Manager for personal hearing on 17-10-1995 and the management got him signed a letter in which it was written that he admits the charges and he should be punished as has been done with the employees similarly circumstances and he should be takenback in service after withholding his increments.

That the workman had not committed any mistake still he signed the letter as his family will survive in case he is takenback in service . He will have to loose only certain increments .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that management conducted an inquiry, prior to this inquiry regarding caste certificate of the worknan an inquiry was held and disciplinary authority by order dated 22-07-1986 exenorated him of the citarges levelled against him vide charge sheet dated 13-07-1980 . It becomes quite obvious that a fulfledged inquiry was held on charge sheet dated 13-07-1980 and the Inquiry Officer did not find the guilt proved and the disciplinary authority relying on the findings of the Inquiry Officer exenorated this workman on 22-07-1987 .

That on 24-11-1995 he was informed that he has admitted his guilt so his appeal was dismissed so the Bank deceived him after assuring him to take back in service withholding 3 increments in case he admitted the charges.

It is prayed that after 16 years of service the workman nas been dismissed and he should be taken back in service .

It was further submitted that the service the workman is governed by the BPS . There is no prey for fresh inquiry or second inquiry . There is no prons for two inquiries. Inquiry against this workman was held by the order of the competent authority. The. Inquiry Onicer afterperusal ofthe inquiry report gave a finding that guilt of the delinquent is not made out. The Disciplinary Authority accepted the findings of the Inquiry Officer and he exenorated the workman .

Itwas submitted that he should not be vexed twice . One Inquiry Officer finds guilt not proved and the other Inquiry Officer finds guilt proved regarding forgery of caste certificate. It is correct that the two inquiries cannot be instituted regarding the same misconduct and there should not be second vexatious trial of the workman In the facts and circumstances of the case caste was the criteria on the basis ofwhich the workman was selected. Caste , age and educational qualification arc essential for appointment The workman submitted a photocopy of caste certificare and he was selected on the basis of that caste certificate . After the first inquiry it might have come to the notice of the workman that he has submitted a false certificate , so the matter was inquired into . It is quite true that a caste certificate No. 381 dated 06-02-1987 vas issued by the DM. Siwan (Bihar). In the original caste certificate the caste of the workman was mentioned as Dushadh and accordingto amended order of 1956 he was a scheduled caste candidate .

The managenient has filed written statement . The case of the respondents is that the reply to the notice of disciplinary proceedings was found not satisfactory so a departmental committee was constituted to go into the charges levelled against the delinquent . The delinquent has filed false caste certificate . After inquiry the Inquiry Officer found the charges proved and a show cause notice was issued to him with proposal of punishment of dismissal . The delinquent replied to that. That after considering his representation the disciplinary authority imposed the punishment ofdismissal on the workman. He filed an appeal . The Appellate Authority after hearing the workman dismissed his appeal . The name of the delinquent was sponsored by Employment Exchange as Scheduled Tribe candidate but when original caste certificate was demanded from hiin he stated that the original was lost and he filed another certificate issued from the District Magistrate . Siwan (Bihar) . The respondents entered into correspondence with the District Magistrate , Siwan (Bihar) regarding the authenticity of the second caste certificate. The DM , Siwan replied that the word Gorait has been added after the word Dushad and the word Jan has been added prior to the word Jati .

It transpires from perusal of the caste certificate submitted by the workman that the word Gorail ar have been added after Dushadh and before Jan forgery has been commuted by the make a certificate of scheduled d monter b It has been further stated that the delinquent did not submit his original certificate at the time of employment . He submitted a photocopy. The second certificate submitted by hin was not similar to the photocopy so the natter was inquired into . It was found that the delinquent has filed a fake and forged certificate in order to get employment . This matter was verified from issuing authority and the issuing authority wrote to the respondents that the photocopy certificate sentto him was not issued in its original b been conducted according the paniples of natural

The workman was Bre ! another caste certificate he submitted from the side of the mans 23-09-1986 the DM, Siwan (Bihar) infor that caste certificate No. 381 has been statt tas pla dated 06-02-1982 and it was found that the appl belonged to caste Dushadh and there is no mention in the certificate of Gorait and Jan. The workman has filed a certificate from All India Harijan Adiwasi Kalyan Sangh dated 05-04-1997 and it has been mentioned in the ustice . The workman has concealed his real caste and he has sought appointment under Scheduled Tribe Category whereas after inquiry he was not found a candidate of Scheduled Tribe . So he was dismissed of service .

2396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

certificate that the workman Hare Ram Majhi is ofGorait caste.Inthis certificate it has been only mentioned that the caste ofHare Ram Majhi is Gorait. It has not been mentioned anywhere in this certificate that he is Scheduled Tribe. The workman has also filed certificate dated 24-11-1986 from the Administrative Officer, Lodi Road, New Delhi and it has been mentioned that Shri Hare Ram Majhi , R/ o . Lodi Road, New Delhi belongs to Dushadh (Gorait caste) which has been declared as Scheduled Tribe by the Government of Bihar . Dushadh and Gorait are identical. Chief Administrative Officer , Government of Bihar, Bihar Bhawan is not entitled to issued caste certificate.

The DM, Siwan has specifically mentioned in his letter No. 25-3 /86-2501 that in the photocopy Shri Hare RamMajhi has added the word Gorait and the word Jan. He has done interpolation and forgery in his caste certificate. From the letter ofthe DM, Siwan it becomes quite obvious that the workman has submitted a forged certificate . The DM, Siwan has asked the respondents that letter No.2061 dated 15-07-1986 be deemed cancelled and amended verified certificate has been issued by the DM, Siwan and it has been mentioned that after verification the Welfare Officer by his letter No.441 dated 08-08-1986 has found him Dushad and a Scheduled Caste .

From perusal ofthe above document it becomes quite clear that the workman did not belong to Scheduled Tribe at the time of his appointment . In his letter dated 04-04-1995 Shri Hare Ram Majhi has categorically admitted thecharges and he has requested the respondent to impose punishment on him as has been done in the case of the employees similarly circumstanced . This letter is categorical admission of the charges levelled against the workman and he had admitted that he submitted a false caste certificate . The workman has filed a photocopy of the letter according to which Gorait has also been included in Scheduled Tribe . Thisdocument is not the original declaration of the Government and the date of such declaration cannot be ascertained from this document . If there is notification he should have filed the attested or certified copy of that declaration . The workman has given anapplication on 23-08-2005 and he has alleged in his letter that in the year 1979 he was appointed to the post of peon in reserved category on the basis of Scheduled Tribe . 30 candidates were recruited belonging to Scheduled Tribe and all have been served chargesheet for submitting fake caste certificate and this workman was also served charge sheet along with them on 13-07-1980. It has been further alleged in this letter that all the chargesheeted employees had filed fake caste certificate and have been taken in service after withholding of 1, 2 or 3 increments with cumulative effect. This workman also requested the management to consider his case as the bank has done in the case of 30 other employees who have submitted fake certificate but Shri R.K. Nagpal , General Secretary of the provincc settled the matter with the respondents and the

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 30 employees mentioned above were taken in service after withholding of increments only. This workman was refused thisbenefit. This application was filed on 23-08-2005 in the presence of the respondents but no objection has been filed against this application . The content ofthis application remains unrebutted. As such the bank found other 30 fake caste certificates and inquiry was conducted against those 30 employees. They admitted the charges and the Bank after negotiations with the General Secretary kept them in service after withholding two or three increments .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that the Bank should have considered his case along with the other such employees . The fact is that the workman did not admit his charge so fulfledged inquiry was conducted against him . The other employees admitted their charges so the respondents retained them in service.

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that his case has been dealt with differently and he has been givendiscriminatory treatment . The respondents have not the discretion to take Scheduled Caste on the post reserved for Scheduled Tribe . But since the respondents have exercised their discretion the benefit of their discretion should also be afforded to the workman applicant. It appears that the workman applicant did not admit his charges so a fulfledged inquiry was held and he was found guilty. The workman later on admitted his guilt but the management did not impose on him the penalty which has been inflicted on the employees similarly situated . The workman is entitled to get this benefit and to get the discretion ofthe respondents , the respondents cannot follow pick and choose policy, if the employee after submitting a fake certificate regarding his caste admits his charges and he is retained in service . Another who does not admit his charge . cannot be given different punishment . The employee was adamant all along the inquiry and he admitted his guilt when he was dismissed . In the facts and circumstances of the case the workman deserves to be reinstated with continuity of service but without back wages .

It appears from perusal of the record that the respondents have retained in service the other employees who produced false Scheduled Tribe Certificate after withholding increments . The claimant is entitled to get this benefit on the principles of equality.

The reference is replied thus :---

The action of the management of Punjab National Bank in dismissing the services of Shri Hare Ram Majhi . Cashier -cum-Clerk w. e. f. 19-12-1994 is neither absolutely legal nor absolutely justified . The workman deserves to be reinstated without back wages but with continuity of service w. e . f. 19-12-1994 within two months from the publication of the award.

Award is given accordingly .

Dated: 17-02-2006

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी, 2006

का. आ. 1064. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनाईटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 30/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-2-2006 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं ० एल-12011/31/ 2005- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 22nd February, 2006 S.O. 1064.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (ReferenceNo. 30/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of United Bank of India, and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 22-2-2006 .

[No. L- 12011/31 /2005- IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW PRESENT :

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 30/2005

Ref. No. L- 1201 1 /31 /2005 - IR (B - II) Dt . 5-7-2005 BETWEEN:

United Bank of India Employees Union Asstt. Regional Secretary, United Bank of India Employees Union , 53 Leader Road , Allahabad -9

AND

The Chief Manager United Bank of India, 4B , Habibullah Estate , Hazratganj , Lucknow

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi referred the following dispute for adjudication to the Presiding Officer , CGIT-cum- Labour Court, Lucknow.

2397

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18 , 2006/ फाल्गुन 27 , 1927

"Whether the action of the management of United Bank of India, Allahabad in imposing the punishment on Sri Shivaji Prasad Mishra vide punishment Order No. CR/ CM/DISC/ SPM/ 1966/2003 Dated 24-9-03 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "

It appears that the claim was espoused by United Bank of India Employees Union, Allahabad. While issuing the reference order the Government of India , Minisrty of Labour endorsed its copy to Chief Manager, United Bank of India, Lucknow and United Bank of India Employees Union , Allahabad. It was directed that the parties raisaing dispute shall file statement of claim complete with relevant documents , list of reliance and witesses with the Triubunal within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forwarded copy of such statement of claim to each one of the opposite parties involved in this dispute under Rule 10 (B) of the I. D. (Central) Rules 1957. The said order of5th July, 2005 and was received in the office of CGIT- cum-Labour Court, Lucknow on 17-8-05 . The Trade Union did not file any statement of claim therefore it was ordered on23rd September, 2005 for waiting for statement of claim. On 23-9-05 none responded when the case was called out therefore registered notice was ordered to be issued to the parties for filing statement of claim . The next date was fixed 28-10-2005 .

On 28-10-05 the workman Sri S. P. Mishra filed an application authorising 3 representative Sri Y. S. Rohit . Sri R. K. Verma and Sri Dilip Verma. Sri Dilip Verma filed the authority letter when the case was called out but did not file statement of claim. Therefore Presiding Officer ordered the registered notice be issued to the opposite party to file written statement list of documents and list of witnesses by 18-11-2005.

On 18-11-2005 Sri D. P. Mukhopadhyay, Dy . Regional Manager filed the authority letter A6 and Sri R. K. Verma filed application D - 5 for adjournment of the case. In the circumstances 6-1-2006 was fixed for filing statcinent of claim.

On6-1-2006 another adjournment application D- 7 was moved, therefore 20-1-06 was fixed for hearing . On 20-1-06 parties did not appear. Therefore 3-2-06 was fixed for hearing.

On 3-2-06 the State President Sri Vikas Nigam moved an application D- 8 seeking adjournment and a opportunity to file sttement of calim . It was ordered on said application that claim statement alongwith the documnets on which the trade union relies alongwith list of witnesses be filed within a week and its photo copy be sent to the bank by registered post and postal receipt be also filed in evidence ofproof for compliance of order . On the same day another date i . e . 13-2-06 was fixed for hearing .

2398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006 /PHALGUNA 27. 1927

The trade union has not been able to plead that Sri S. P. Misra was the employee of the United Bank of India on a particular post and he was punished by the order No. CR/ CM/DISC/ SPM/ 1966/ 2003 dt . 24-9-03 and the said order was illegal and unjustified . It was for the trade union to prove that the punishment order referred in the reference order was illegal and unjustified. In the circumstances of the case the management has not filed anywritten statement . There is no other alternative then to pass No Claim Award . Award passed accordingly .

Lucknow 13-2-2006

SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 24 फ़रवरी , 2006

का. आ. 1065. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-2-2006 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-12012/9/2001- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th February, 2006

S.O. 1065. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 33/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - Cum - Labour Court. Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24-2-2006.

[No. L- 12012/9 /2001 - IR( B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT BANGALORE

Dated 14th February 2006

PRESENT

SHRI A.R. SIDDIQUI : Presiding Officer

C.R. No.33/01

IIParty

IParty

Shri MB . Gunaga , The Deputy General Manager

Syndicate Bank ,

S/ o B. N. Gunaga .

Vill . Tankanikeri ,

Zonal Office , Syndicate Towers ,

UDUPL

Ankola Taluk .

Karnak - 576101

Karwar

Karnataka -581314

[PART II-SE . 3 (1) ]

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause( d ) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order. No. L - 12012 /9 /2001 / IR ( B - II ) dated 27th April , 2006 for adjudication on the following schedule .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of tire management of Syndicate Bank Zonal Office , Udupi isjustified in imposing the punishment ofdismissal from service to Shri M.B. Gunaga , Attender, Basgod branch as per Clause 19.5(j ) of the Bipartite Settlement ? If not , what relief the said workman is entitled to? "

(touching to the merits of the case) spleadto titre d to the validity of DE are avoided as DE lush, er heid tot a not fair and proper vide sepatitis hat beperk the services of the management as a sorsstalon t - Se and worked at Karwar Branch: upto 6-11 12 sa transferred to Avarsa branch li 3-1 - א

transferred to Basgod branch of Ankola Taink where is worked up till 29-4-2000 till he was dismissed from 508 illegally , that he worked with t ermagement dischar his duties with utmost devotica and suurin menci Sukuru Gonda one of the custo! vers of the hard, alle 2. The case of the first party workman ( herein after called the first party ) as made out in the Clara Statetiont and excellent record of service is to apories more than 20 years receiving tal appreciaren hathurs and certificates for having can assed maximum busines for the bank: that in the month of December 1999 , the fas party was made a victim o circumstances by the management officials in collusi taнасочарнасьев another by obtaining a compl . in letar from one that the first party had issued a Diamond Juble fina Certificate for a sum of Rs . 2000 on 14-0- said Shiva Gouda ( for short) with a maturity vahe of Rs.4000/-as on 14-12-1999 and that Shiva Gouda had produced the DJCC for repayment of the marity value with the bank ; that while he was working at Basgod Branch on 23-12-1999 , the branch manager on intimation from the Manager. Avarsa Branch directed the first party to go to Avarsa branch with a sum of Rs . 4000/- with bra. Hevisited the Avarsa branch at + PM without knowing the reasons for the same, that at about 4 PM on 23-12-1999 when the first party emered the chambers of the branch . Avarsa Branch . to his surprise he found Shri Ganesh Rao , the then Branch Manager. Shri N.R. Bhat . the Assistant Manager. Avarsa Branch. Shri Ganesh Kamath , Divisional Manager and Shri Anna Roa. Deputy Dis isional Manager present in the chambers of the Branch Manager. Avarsa Branch . No sooner he entered the chambers . the door of the cabin was kept closed and the first party was asked as to whether he had issued the DJCC bearing No. 0364414 dated 14-6-1994 with a face value of Rs . 2000 / -and the maturity value of [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2399 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18 , 2006 / फाल्गुन 27, 1927

course of enquiry, the complaint of said Shiva Gouda was marked without examining him as a witness ; that during course of enquiry none of the management witnesses have deposedto the fact that first party comitted the misconduct . However, the enquiry officer submitted his findings holding the first party guilty of the charges being biased in favour ofthe management . Therefore, findings were perverse and the punishment of dismissal passed by the disciplinary authority was illegal and punishment was also harsh and excessive . In the last he requested this tribunal to pass an award setting aside the punishment order and reinstating him in service with all back wages and consequential benefits.

Rs.4000/-to any of the customers . When the first party denied the allegations , the aforesaid officials directed him to admit the guilt and give it in writing that he had committed the offence of issuing DJCC to Shiva Gouda, a customer of the bank. When he refused to admit the guilt they threatened him of the dire consequences of handing over him to the police and assured him that in the event of his admission of the guilt , no disciplinary action will be taken against him and he will be continued in the service . Thus , creating fear and hope in the mind of the first party the management succeeded in obtaining the letter of admission ofguilt which was not given by him voluntarily but under threat , force and coercion . They also made him to deposit a sum of Rs . 4000/- in the Suspense Account of the Bank on the next date i.e. on 24-12-1999 ; that based on the aforesaid allegations and the letter of admission obtained from him, he was placed under suspension víde order dated 28-12-1999 and thereafter he was issued with the charge sheetwith the allegation that he had issued DJCC in favour of Shiva Gouda in his own hand writing and forged the signatures of the bank officials and therefore , committed misconduct within the meaning of Section 19 ( 5 ) of the Bipartite settlement read with Section 19 ( 5) ( J) thereof; that after he received the charge sheet , on 11-2-2000 the branch manager, Basgod Branch by name Shri Dinakar Sharegar called him to his chamber and directed him to give a letter in writing admitting the guilt as per his above said letter of admission assuring him that in the event of giving such a letter no departmental action will taken against him and he will be continued in service without conducting any proccedings. He was further threatened of direconsequences, if he did not give a letter admitting the guilt. Therefore , the first party having no other option gave a letter in writing as per terms dictated by the branch manager . The first party contended that the charge sheet issued to him was false and baseless as DJCC does not bear the branch serial number or signature ofthe authorized officials of the branch and that as on 14-6-1994 , the bank had withdrawn the said deposit scheme and therefore , question of issuing of said DJCC, that too , in the joint custody ofthe managers by the first party did not arise . He contended that no subordinate officials will have access to the DJCC, it being in the safe custody of the branch manager . Therefore , issuance of DJCC is not the work of the first party but he has been made a scape goat to save the skin of the higher officials by taking a letter of admission from him under threat and coercion.Moreover, the question of conducting enquiry against the first party did not arise when he is said to have admitted the guilt and that show's that there was conspiracy against the first party in conducting the DE thereby making it to appear that charge of miconduct was proved against him that during the course of enquiry absolutely no opportunity was given to him being threatened by the managerment representative and his higher officials of dire consequences , he was not allowed to take the assistance of advocate ; that during the

2. The management by its counter statement not denying the fact that the first party joined its services on 16-8-80 working at Karwar and then transferred to Aversa branch and that he was working in Basgod branch at the time of his dismissal , however , at para 4 of the Counter Statement he repeated the entire allegations made in the chargesheet issued against the first party. The management contended that in response to the chargesheet the first party submitted his explanation on 11-2-2000 adnutting the charges levelled against him but in order to give him one more opportunity to have his say, enquiry was ordered and held against the first party giving sufficient and proper opportunityto defend himself. During the course of enquiry hewas permitted to take the assistance ofhis co - employee but he submitted that he did not wish to take any defence representative and that he himself would defend the case . The management examind two witnesses and when called upon for their cross-examination the first party said that he has no cross - examination since he has already admitted the charges levelled against him . He was given opportunity to lead evidence but did not adduce once again on the same ground. He admitted the charges when read over to him on 15-3-2000 therefore , after completing the enquiry proceedings , the enquiry officer submitted his findings holding him guilty of the misconduct and then findings of the enquiry were sent to the first party and he failed to submit his explanation . Thereupon the disciplinary authority having gone through the findings and other records proposed the punishment of dismissal vide show cause notice dated 17-4-2000 giving opportunity of personal hearing to the first party fixed on 24-4-2000 on which date the first party once again made a written submission admitting the charges and thereafter the disciplinary authority confirmed the proposed punishment of dismissal vide order dated 3-8-2000 . The management contended that the first party mostly misused his official position and pilfered cash certificate from the stock of the branch unauthorisedly and made use of it and thereby misappropriated the funds . Therefore , considering the seriousness of the charges proved against the first party dismissal order wasjustified and punishment of dismissal was quite proportionate and proper . While giving answer [PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] 2400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

to para 3 of the Claim Statement at para 19 of the Counter Statement , the management denied the allegation that the first party was made victim of the circumstances by the officials of the bank in obtaining a complaint from said Shiva Gouda on 27-12-1999. While answering para 4 ofthe Claim Statement , the management denied the allegation that on 23-12-1999 Basgod Branch Manager asked the first party to go Aversa Branch with a sum of Rs.4000. The management contended that it was the first party who visited the Aversa Branch on 23-12-1999 at about 3.15 pm and on enquiry admitted the fact of issuing DJCC to said Shiva Gouda and submitted a confession letter and thereafter deposited a sum of Rs . 4000 on 24-12-1999 . The allegations with regard to coercion , threat etc. in obtaining the letter ofadmission were also denied by the management . However, admitting the fact that the letter was witnessed by Shri Ganesh Rao , Manager, Shri N.R. Bhat , Branch Manager, Smt .Veena D. Prabhu . Special Assistant ofAversa Branch. In reply to para 14 of the Claim Statement , the management contended that there was no requirement that the customer of a Bank/complainant should be examined as a witness during the course of enquiry . It further contended that the charges of misconduct levelled against the first party have been proved during the course of enquiry by sufficient and legal evidence. Therefore , the management requested this tribunal to reject the reference.

party examined himself as WW1 and his statement in examination chief is more or less akin to the averments made in his Claim Statement . MW3 is the said Shri N.R. Bhat said to have been working in Aversa Branch of the management from 3-5-1999 to April 2001. In his examination chiefby way of affidavit at para 3 relevant for the purpose stated that when he was on duty on17-12-1999 Shiva Gouda came to the branch claiming the payment of DJCC certificate No.0364414with maturity value of Rs. 4000 /. He verified the records but could not locate the entry relating to the said receipt . Since the management of branch was on leave he asked the said Shiva Gouda to come to the bank. After 3 days and after the manager, Ganesh Rao resumed duty he brought this fact to his notice . Shri Ganesh Rao also verified the concerned register/ records of the branch but did not find any entry in the bank regarding issue of the DJCC certificate . He stated that whenever DJCC is issued it will bear branch serial number but in the case of disputed certificate there was no branch serial number put thereon. The maturity value is also not correct . In this regard he referred to certain documents maintained by the bank. At para 7 he stated that he and the manager observed the handwriting found on DJCC certificate resembled the hand writing of Shri Gunaga ( first party ) who had worked earlier inAversa Branch as Attender . The branch manager after verifying the DJCC with that of hand writing of first party had informed the Regional Manager accordingly. Then at para 8 he repeated the contention taken in the counter statement that on receipt of the intimation from Aversa Branch the Manager, Basgod Branch sent the first party to Aversa Branch and then on enquiry the first party admitted the fact of issuing said DJCC in favour of said Shri Shiva Gouda issuing Rs.2000/- he thereafter remittted Rs . 4000/- with the bank on 24-12-1999 . He further stated that the manager of Aversa Branch has given a joint statement to the Regional Office about the incident on hand . His statement in further examination chief with reference to the documents at Ex.M10 to 21 is as under-

3. Keeping in view the respective contentions of the parties with regard to the validity and legaility or other- wise of the proceedings of domestic enquiry , my learned predecessor had taken the above said question for trial as a Preliminary Issue calling upon the parties to lead evidence. During the course of trial of the said issue the management examined the enquiry officer as MWI and the then Assistant Manager of Basgod Branch as MW2 and got marked 9 documents at Ex.M1 to M9 . The first party as a rebuttal , examined himself as WW1 without marking any document . Ex.Ml is the notice of enquiry . Ex.M2 is the charge Sheet . Ex.M3 is the explanation dated 11-2-2000 by the first party. Ex.M4 is the proceeding of enquiry. Ex.M5 are the findings of the enquiry officer. Ex.M6 is the order of suspension. Ex.M7 is said to be the letter of the first party dated 24-4-2000 submitted at the time of personal hearing. Ex.M8 is the letter regarding the payment of subsistence allowance to the first party and Ex.M9 is the SB account sheet of the first party.

" I now sec Ex . M.10 it is the certification issued by the first party. Ex. M11 is the packing note for having sent Diamond Jübilee Certificate Book to the branch from Head Office . Ex. M12 is the Caste Certificate ledger. Ex . M13 is the Cashier Scroll for. 14-6-94 . Ex . M14 is the list of officials working in your branch with their specimen signatures . Ex . M15 is the extract of attendance register for the month of June 1994. Ex. M16 is the confession letter given by the first party. Ex . M17 is joint report given by myself and the Manager of the branch to the Regional Officer, Karwar. Ex . M19 is the Challan for depositing Rs . 4000/- by the first party. Ex. M19 is the letter given by Shri Shiva Sukru Gowda in the branch . Ex . M20 is the letter given by the manager to the regional office .

4. After hearing the learned counsels for the respective parties , this tribunal by its order dated 20-7- 2004 recorded a finding on the above said question ofDE holding that the DE held against the first party by the second party is not fair and proper. Thereupon the management was given an opportunity to lead evidence on merits to prove the charges of misconduct levelled against the first party. The management in order to prove the charges, examined three witnesses as MW3 to MW5 and got marked documents at Ex.M10 to M25 . The first 2401 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

Ex. M21 is the receipt passed by the said SSGowda for having received Rs .4000.

5. MW4 said to have been working as ChiefOfficer inRegional Office, Karwar in the year 1999, in his affidavit evidence stated that he was entrusted with the task of investigating the fraudulent issue of DJCC of Rs . 2000 by Shri Gunaga . At paras 5 , 7, 8 and 9 fhe repeated the contention taken by the management in its Counter Statement and at Para 6 he stated as follows :

1. The DJCC does not bear on it the branch Serial number.

2. The signatures appearing in the said DJCC do not tally with the signatures of the authorized signatories of the branch .

3. During the period when the impugned DJCC was issued , the Bank had withdrawn the said deposit scheme and the said scheme was not in operation.

words .He also pleaded guilty to the charges during the course of enquiry and on the ground that he pleaded guilty to the charges. He neither cross examined the management witnesses nor led his own defence . He submitted that during the course of personal hearing by the disciplinary authority, the first party once again made written submission on 24-4-2000 at Ex. M7 admitting the guilt requesting the Disciplinary Authority to taken lenient view. He also admitted the charges by way of his memorandum of appeal marked before this tribunal at Ex . M23 and therefore , it is based on his admission of guilt coupled with the oral and documentary evidence produced during the course of enquiry, findings were submitted by the enquiry officer holding him guilty of the charges . He submitted that the defence taken by the first party for the first time in his claim statement and then duringthe course oftrial stating that the letter of admission dated 23-12-99 at Ex. M16 was obtained from him by the aforesaid officials of the bank under force, coercion, threat and the promise is an after thought stand taken by him just to come out of the clutches of the proceedings taken against him. Learned counsel submitted that if he had admitted the guilt only once and comes with such a stand one can understand that he must have done it under the circumstances stated by him. But hereafter giving the letter at Ex.M16 he submitted his explanation to the charge sheet admitting the guilt and during the course of enquiry also made a similar submission when charges were read out to him. He repeatedly admitted the guilt even during the course ofpersonal hearing and while filing the appeal and therefore, the defence taken by him is neither acceptable nor plausible and hence based on the admissions made by him from stage to stage it must be held that the charges of misconduct have been proved against him . He submitted that the oral testimony ofMW3 to MW5 must be relied upon in support of the documentary evidence namely the letters and explanation given by the first party admitting the guilt . Learned counsel cited the following 3 decisions to sustain his arguments.

1. 1995 (I ) LLJ 233

2. 1995 ( I) LLJ 1076

6. In his further examination chief he stated that he has gone through the documents at Ex. M10 to M21 while conducting the investigation . MW5 saidto be working as Senior Manager in Nodal Industrial Relation Cell at Regional Office, Udupi since February, 2003 says that in the said capacity he is looking after the industrial disputes writ petitions, disciplinary action etc , and therefore, he is conversant with the facts of the present case . Then he narrated the facts on the line of the contentions taken by the management in the counter statement . In his further examination chief he referred to a letter dated 23-12-1999 saidto have been given by the first party marked already at Ex. M16 . He then referred to the proceedings of the disciplinary authority and got marked at Ex . M22 , Memorandum of appeal against the punishment order, proceedings of the appellate authority and order of the appellate authority were also marked at Ex . M23 to M25 in his above said statement. I would like to come to the documentary evidence relevant for the purpose reliedupon by the management and the statements of MW3 to MW5 and WW1 in their cross examination taken support ofby the first party during the course of my discussion hereinafter as and when found relevant and necessary.

3. AIR 2000 SC3129

8. Whereas , learned counsel Shri V. Bhat representing the first party with equal vehemence argued that charges of misconduct have been not proved against the first party by leading any fresh evidence and the management cannot be allowed to take the help of documents forming the part of the enquiry papers in proving the charges of misconduct as the DE proceedings itself are set aside by this tribunai on the ground that it was the enquiry not fair and proper . He submitted that even otherwise the confessional statement said to have beenmade by the first party, they rare are made by him under threat, coercion and promise by the manager of 7. Learned counsel for the management Shri BCP vehemently argued that the first party from the day one went on admitting the charges of misconduct levelled against him on 23-12-99 in his own hand writing in the chambers of Manager, Aversa Branch in the presence of Shri NR Bhat, Branch Manager and other officials of the bank when enquired about the issuance of DJCC marked at Ex. M10 before this tribunal admitted the charges levelied against him in writing at Ex. M16 and he deposited a sum of Rs. 4000/-through challen at Ex. M18 under his signature atEx . M18 ( a) and when charge sheet was issued to him on 2-2-2000 at Ex . M2 once again by his explanation dated 11-2-2000 at Ex . M3 he again admitted the guilt in so many

643G1/2006-23 2402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

PART II--SEC. 3 ( ii)

forgery committed by the first party in issuing the said certificate. He submitted that the chargesheet issued to the first party dated 2-2-2000 itself is based on hear say evidence . He submitted that the most competent and important witness to prove the allegations of charge slicet was the said Shiva Gouda and he was neither produced before the Enquiry Officer nor before this tribunal to speak to the charges or to the allegations that he paid Rs . 2000/- tothe first partyand from him obtained Ex. M10 . Therefore , learned counsel submitted that the charges leveiled against the first party have not been proved by sufficient , satisfactory and legal evidence and in the result he must succeed in getting the reliefs sought for by setting aside the punishment order. Learned counsel in support of his argumcat that management must fail before this tribunal in not leading fresh evidence and to rely upon the material aiready brought during the course of enquiry to prove the charges against the first party. He cited the decision reported in 1967 SLR page 562, a decision in volume 71 FJR page 384 and a decision reported in AIR 1999 SC 698. in order to appreciate the respective contentions of the parties with reference to the evidence brought on record it will be worthwhile to bring on record the very charge sheet issued tothe first party run as under:-----

Charge sheet

It isreported against you as under : ---

That you have been working as Attender at our Basgod Branch since 2-2-1998 till you were placed under suspension vide order No. Susp./3/99/ZOU/ IRC dated 28-12-1999 . Prior to that you were working as Aîtender at our Aversa Branch from 6-11-1982 to 3-1-1998. While working in your position as such at Aversa Branch on 14-6-1994 you had issued one DJCC for Rs . 2000/ -in favour of one Shri Shiva Sukur Gouda without accounting Rs . 2000/ - received from Shri Shiva Sukhru Gouda in the books of the branch . The following circumstances appear against you in respect of the above transaction .

L

On 17-12-1999 , one Shri Shiva Sukuru Gouda called onour Aversa Branch demanding repayment of DJCC standing in his name bearing printed serial number 0364414 for Rs 2000/- with a maturity value of Rs . 4000/- and date of inaturity 14-12-1999 . The branch officials however could not locate the entry pertuning to the said deposit receipt. In fact the branch had not issued any DJCC. Further verification revealed that the said deposit receipt bearing printed serial No. 0364414 was out of the stock of DJCC Nos 0364301 to 0364500 received from Head Office by the branch and the same was written by you and was bearing the forged signatures ofthe branch officials .

When this matter was informed to you when you visited the branch on 23-12-1999 , you confessed having issued the said deposit receipt to Shri Shiva AversaBranch and Sr. Branch Manager, N. R. Bhat and he being a sub - staff, it cannot be said that he did not yield to the pressure brought apon him by these officers in obtaining the confessional statement roterred 17 supra. He submitted that the explanation to the chargesheet was again kept ready by the manager , Aversa branch and once again he was threatened to sign the said explanation under force and promise . He submitted that during the course i enquiry again the enquiry officer and the presenting officer wi.o were officials of the management bank prevailed upon hura to plead guilty to the charges . He submitted that memorandum of appeal was also the one prepared by the manager, Aversa branch and therefore , these doaments so to say confession statements relied upon by the management cannot be found basis in coming to the conclusion that the first party in reality admitted the charges of the misconduct . He submitted that the management should have produced fresh evidence after DE was held to be unfair and improper either by way of circumstantial evidence or by way of direct evidence but in the instant case evidence of MW3 to 5 is neither a circumstantial evidence nor a direct evidence but a hear say evidence not to carry any weight in the eye of law. He then referred to various circumstances and factors brought out in the cross examination of MW3 to 5 to prove his point that the main allegations levelled against the first party that he issued DJCC receiving Rs . 2000 from Shiva Gouda under his own. handwriting and forged the signatures of the officers of the bank on Ex . M10 have remained to be proved by the management miserably. He submitted that the very existence ofDJCC at Ex . M10 with the bank at a relevant point of time has been shrouded under mystery. He contended thatas on 1994 the deposit scheme by way of DJCC was not at all in force as that scheme in the very words of the management and the statement of MW4 had come to be abolished in the year 1986 itself. He also referred to the evidence of the aforesaid witnesses to suggest that those DJCCs were supposed to be in the custody of the manager not accessible by any officials of the bank much less a sub- staff like the first party. He contended that the complaint at Ex. M19 itself has come into existence under suspicious circumstancesjust to connect the accused with the guilt. This has been obtained by the officers of the bank on 27-12-99 and whereas, the alleged statement of first party atEx.M16 was taken from him on 23-12-99 long prior to the said complaint and the joint report of the then manager Shri Ganesh Rao and NR Bhat at Ex . M17 , it can never be made out that Shiva Gouda has paid a sum of Rs . 2000 to firstparty and he issued the certificate at Ex. M10 . These two document never disclosed the above said fact in specific and positive words, that too, leaving lot of space betweenwriting and the signature of Shri Shiva Gouda , withaddition and interpretation. He submitted that the officers or officials working in the bank as on 14-6-1994, the date on which Ex. M10 was issued not at all produced before this tribunal to speak to the handwriting or the 2403 [ भागII-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

Sukru Gouda by accepting Rs . 2000/ - from him on 14-6-1994 . You have also deposited Rs . 4000 at our AversaBranch on 24-12-1999 for making payment to Shri Shiva Sukru Gouda being the maturity value as shown in the said DJCC . Aversa Branch has paid the amount to the party on 27-12-1999 .

The above circumstances indicate that you with a dishonest intention pilfered the DJCC No. 0364414 from the stock held by the branch and by collecting Rs. 2000/- from Shri Shiva Gouda on 14-6-1994 issued the receipt in his name for Rs. 2000/- and without accounting the amount so received in the books of the branch, you misappropriated the said amount .

By your above acts you committed acts of gross misconduct within the meaning of clause No. 19.5 of theBipartite Settlement.

We therefore , charge you for committing gross misconduct of ' doing acts prejudicial to the interest ofthe bank' vide clause No. 19.5 ( j ) of the Bipartite Settlement.

You are advised to submit your written statement of defence ifany, within 15 days from the date ofreceipt of the chargesheet by you. "

9. Therefore , as could be read from the aforesaid chargesheet the three main allegations against the first party are that while working at Aversa Branch on 14-6-1994 he issued one DJCC for Rs . 2000/- in favour of Shiva Gouda without accounting the same in the books of the branch . The next allegation is that the above said DJCC was written by first party and was bearing the forged signatures of the bank officials . The 3rd allegation is that on 23-12-1999 he admitted the guilt and deposited Rs . 4000/-on 24-12-99 at Aversa Branch to be paid to the said Shiva Gouda.

Branch nor the first party worked under him at the relevant point of time. This fact has been admitted by MW3 in his cross examination by saying that he did not know first party personally and he was not working at the above said branch as on the date of the alleged incident. He then stated that he has not seen the first party either writing or signing the above said certificate Ex . M10 and he has not seen the first party forging the signatures of the authorized signatories and the manager on Ex . М10. In his fürther cross examination he admitted that he is not personally acquainted either with handwriting or the signature of the first party except coming across his confessional letter at Ex, M16 . He shown his ingnorance asto who filled up Ex. M10 and who signed it . However, he added to say that first party himself told him about that. This portion of the statement of MW3 has to be rejected as hearsay evidence . As far as from his earlier statement noted above , it can be very well said that he was not personally acquainted with the handwriting of the first party nor of his signature nor he has been the witness for his writing and signatures, at Ex . M10 . Therefore, the statement made by him in his affidavit at para 7 referred to supra that on his observation he found that the handwriting found on Ex . M10 resembled the handwriting of first party must be rejected as baseless and unreliable. The then Branch Manager, Shri Ganesh Rao who is said to have verified the handwriting as per the statement of MW3 would have been the person competent to speak to the said fect . Unfortunately he is not before this tribunal . The next witness on the point is MW4 said to have investigate into the incident . First of all the fact that he did investigat in to the incident is not established before this tribunal . Investigation report itself is not produced. In his further examination chief he stated that he has gone through the documents at Ex . M2 to 21 while conducting the investigation. In his cross examination he was to admit trot he has not recorded the statements of any witness except the aforesaid documents in his investigation . He admitted that he has not put any initial or signature anywhere certifying that he has seen those documents . Though he says that he drawn the proceeding of his investigation but not produced in the court. He admits that he has not obtained any writing from the first party or Shiva Gouda during his investigation. With regard to the writing and signatures ofthe first party MW3 admitted in his cross examination thatthe first party did not work under him and he has not seen him personally putting the signature on any paper norwriting any paper. He was to further admit that he has not seen the first party writing Ex. M10 so also taking money from Shiva Gouda . He further admitted that there isnodirect evidence that the first party stealthily removed Ex.M10 from DJCC bundle and issued it under the signature of Shiva Gouda . In fact he voluteered to say that Ex. M10 is written by the first party and he put his 10. As argued for the first party, the oral testimony ofMW3 to 5 before this tribunal failed to establish the aforesaid allegations against the first party. First of all their evidence is a hearsay evidence and secondly none of them in their affidavits by way of examination chief has spoken to those facts. Undisputedly MW3 to 5 have not worked at Aversa Branch as on 14-6-94 on which date DJCC at Ex. 10 is said to have been issued by the first party receiving a sum ofRs . 2000/- from the said Shri Gouda. In his affidavit at para 7 , MW3 stated that he and the manager observed the handwriting found on said certificate resembled the handwriting ofGunga ( first party) who worked earlier in Aversa Branch as Attender . He stated that the Branch Manager after verifying the certificate with that of the handwriting of the first party informed the Regional Manager, Karwar by his letter dated 20-1-2000 . First of all the then Branch Manager, Ganesh Rao has not been produced before this tribunal to support the above said statement of MW3 made in his examination chief. Sencondly admittedly MW3 did not work with Aversa fake signature and the signature found on Ex . M10 is not [PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2404

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27, 1927

the signature of the first party. Similar is the fact with the statement of MW5 . In his cross examination he admits that he has not seen the first party signing Ex. M10 nor receiving the amount from anybody nor he has seen him putting his signature or forged any signature . Therefore , on the point as towhether Ex . M10 was written by the first party under his signature and that he forged the signatures of bank officials competent to issue the same remains to the substantiaied in the oral testimony of MW3 to MW5 . As noted above, their statements in cross examination would make it abundantly clear that they are absolutely unaware ofthewriting in Ex . M10 , the alleged signature of the first party on that and the alleged forged signatures made by the first party. As argued for the first party, the best witness to speak to the above said facts would have been the then Assistant Manager and the branch manager Shri Genesh Rao who were competent to issue Ex . M10 and whose signatures are said to have been forged on Ex. M10. However, the management for the reasons best known to it did not produce either of them before this tribunal. On the point as to whether the first party received a sum of Rs . 2000/-from Shiva Gouda and issued Ex . M10 again there is no evidence at all . MW 3 to MW5 are not the witnesses to the said allegations made against the first party. As noted above , MW3 in his cross examination admitted that he has not seen personally the first party receiving a sum of Rs . 2000/-from Shiva Gouda . MW4 as noted above. has stated that he has not seen the first party writingEx . M10 so also taking money from Shri Shiva gouda. MW5 in his cross examination stated that he has no personal knowledge of the facts and his evidence is based on the records.

present in the chambers of the Aversa Branch manager when Ex. M16 was obtained . It is very strange to note that MW3 examined before this tribunal uttered no single word inhis affidavit refuting the facts narrated by the first party inhis affidavit at para7. Although he admitted his presence in the chambers of Aversa Branch Manager on the said date. Neither the said Ganesh Rao nor the other bank officials said to be present when the above said confession statement was given by the first party are produced before this tribunal to speak to the fact the first party gave his said statement voluntarily and not under the circumstances narrated by him . As argued for the first party the best and competent witness to speak to the aforesaid allegations made against him namely. Shri Shiva Gouda was neither produced before the enquiry nor before this tribunal and therefore, adverse inference will have to be drawn for his non production and non examination . The only argument advanced for the management on that point is that customer ofthe bank need not be examined and learned counsel in this respect referred to a decision reported in AIR 2000 SC 3028. The principle laid down in the said case in my humble opinion are not applicable to the present case . As could be read from the said decision , the charge of misconduct against the workman in the said case was proved in DE and there was evidence of branch manager and head cashier to say that they had actually seen the workman receiving the money from the customer. In the instant case the facts are altogether different. None has seen the first party either receiving the amount from said Shiva Gouda nor issuing Ex.M10 in his favour. Therefore , if really the management was sure enough of said Shiva Gouda receiving Ex . M10 from the first party by paying a sum of Rs . 2000 /- nothing prevented the management to produce him atleast before this tribunal . He was the only best and competent witness to speak the allegations made against the first party. Therefore , his non examination must lead to adverse inference against the management as had he been produced. his statement would have gone against the management . It is the case of the management that on 17-12-1999 said Shiva Gouda visited Aversa Branch with Ex . M10 claiming maturity value of Rs. 4000/ - and the then Assistant Manager namely MW3 after having verified the records could not locate the entry of issuance of the said certificate by the bank and asked Gouda to come to the bank after Ganesh Rao who the then manager joined the duty on the expiry of the leave period . There is noevidence worth credence brought on record except the statement of MW3 in his examination chief on the point . There is no written complaint by the said Gouda even after he met Ganesh Rao with Ex.M10 . The management relied upon Ex . M19 saying that it was given by said Gouda on 27-12-1999 . First of all ifwe go through the contents of Ex. M19 it cannot be said that it isa complaint made against the first party. The contents in fact are to the effcct that he had received a sum of Rs . 4000/ as a maturity value against Ex . M10 . Moreover , itjust cannot 11. Now, the 3rd allegation as noted above , against the first party is that he made a confessional statement on 23-12-99 as per Ex . M16 in the presence of Shri Ganesh Rao, MW3 and other officials of the bank. The fact that the first party made such a statement has been admitted by him but with a rider that it has been obtained from him creating an atmosphere of fear in the presence ofthe officers of the Aversa Branch namely the said Ganesh Rao , the then manager Aversa Branch , NR Bhat, the then assistant manager , Aversa Branch , Shri Ganesh Kamath, Divisional Manager and Shri Anna Rao. Dy. Divisional Manager . His defence is that all of them make him to admit issuances of Ex. MJ0 and receiving Rs . 2000/-from Shiva Gouda under force, coercion , promise and threat being held against him tohand over him to police incase he failed to give in writing admitting the guilt . There are no good reasons brought on record not to attach duc credence to the above said defence taken by the first party. On the other hand his averment at para 4 of the claim statement repeated by him at para 6 of the affidavit to the above effect have remained to be controverted and disputed by the management either in the counter statement or in the statements of MW3 to 5. In the Counter Statement it is not disputed that MW3 was be believed that complaint was obtained from said Gouda *

2405 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

said branch or not and he is also to aware of their existence itself nor has come across any complaint of missing of DJCC'S , bundle . Therefore , if we go by the statements of MW3 and MW4 , the veryexistence of DJCC bundle consisting ofEx . M10 with the bank as on 14-6-1994 itself becomes highly doubtful . The scheme of issuing certificates came tobe discontinued in 1986 itself i . e. about 8 years prior to 1994 and the management witnesses themselves are not aware where the DJCCs, left behind are after closure of the scheme and whether they were with the bank as on 14-6-1994. The management to be on safer side has not produced the balance DJCCs , remaining with the bank after the closure of the scheme. Even the management did not take pains of atleast producing one such DJCC as a sample so as to be tallied with the DJCCs , at Ex. M10 in dispute before this tribunal . It is in this view of the matter we cannot brush aside lightly the arguments for the first party that Ex. M10 is not the DJCC consisting of DJCCs received by the bank and left over after closure of the scheme . The fact that DJCC's , even if they were with the bank were not accessible by the officials of the bank except the branch manager is again very much bought out in the cross examination of MW3 and MW4. In no uncertain words they have stated that they are supposed to be in - the safe custodyoftheBranch Manager and they are to be handled withjointly by the Assistant Manager and the Manager of the branch. Therefore , it is very difficult to believe the story of the management that the first party working as an Attender had an access to those DJCCs and could play mischiefby taking one out of them by issuing the same to saidGouda receiving the amount of Rs . 2000/-from him. The fact that Ex. M10 did not bear the branch serial number and that the maturity value itself is not correct has also come in the evidence of management witnesses . Therefore , it is also doubtful to say that the customer of the bank namely Gouda should rely upon the said certificate that too making payment with the Attender of the Branch and remaining silent for a period of 5 Years . The conduct of said Gouda certainly was not natural thereby doubting the very story of the management about the issuance of Ex. M10 by the first party to said Gouda. 2

12. Therefore , the evidence produced by the management before this tribunal to prove the allegations ofcharge sheet is neither legal , satisfactory or sufficient in asmuch as the statement of MW3 to MW5 as noted above, made in their advits is an hearsay evidence and whereas , their statements in cross examination instead of helping the management go in favour of the first party.

13. Learned counsel for the management without taking muchhelp from the oral testimony of MW3 to W5 before this tribunal was very much particular stressing upon the fact that the first party has admitted the guilt not at one after four or five days of obtaining the confessional statement from the first party on 23-12-99 . When there is no evidence to say that there was an oral complaint made to the then Branch Manager , Shri Ganesh Rao and Rao himself is not before this tribunal and when there is no complaint inwriting byGouda earlier to 23-12-1999 it is not understandable as to what made the bank officials to haul up the first party in getting the aforesaid statement at Ex.M16 on 23-12-1999 even before any complaint was lodged with the bank . That too when it is not disputed that thebank did not lodge any complaint with the police about the alleged incident. It is said that the Ganesh Rao and MW3 had sent ajoint letter dated 23-12-1999 to the regional office after having obtained the statement of first party. It is very much interesting to note that in the said statement, no where, it is stated that the first party received a sum of Rs.2000/-from Shri Gouda and issued the certificate at Ex.M10. The story with regard to the existence of Ex.M10 with the Aversa Branch and its issuance to Gouda or to anybody for that matter, itself, is very much suspicious. The deposit scheme in respect to the said DJCCs as admitted in itby management itself. came to an end in the year 1986 itself and it is again not in dispute that as on 14-6-1994 such a scheme was not at all prevalent . Learned counsel for the first party challenged the very existence of such a DJCCs including Ex.M10 with the bank as on 14-6-1994 and got support to his challenge from the very statement given by the management witnesses before this tribunal . Management produced Ex.M11 said to be the packing note for having sent DJCCs book to the branch from head office. On this point MW3 in his cross examination was unable to make out from Ex.M11 as to who received the book containing DJCCs admitting that there is over writing found at Ex.M11 ( a) with regard to the number of the certificates mentioned therein . Then he was unable to say as to how many such certificates have been issued by the bank and what was the number of the last certificate and the date of issuance of last certificate . He was also unable to say as to from which period to which period those certificates came to be issued by the bank to the customers . He was unable to say upto what date those certificates were issued and how many certificates were left behind after the date of closure of the certificate . He said that in case of certificates remaining after the closure date they will be kept in the safe custody of the branch i.e. in the custody of the Manager and the Assistant Manager. He admitted he has not produced record of sending back the balance certificates to the head office so also the record destroying them . MW4 said to have been investigated the matter, in his cross examination says that he has not seen and verified the bundle of DJCC, with the bank and he cannot say that Ex. M10 is one missing from the said bundle. He is not aware whether those DJCCS , bundle with the 2406

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

time but at many times and therefore, his defence now before this tribunal that he made those statements under coercion, force, threats or promise has to be discarded and charges of miconduct against him shail be taken to prove . Learned counsel for the first party on the other hand as noted above , argued that the alleged confessional statements including the statement made by the firstparty at Ex . M16 were all the documents forming part of record before the enquiry officer and therefore, when DE is set aside , they once again cannot be pressed into evidence before this tribunal in the name of fresh evidence to be led by the management to prove the charges of misconduct against the first party. He relied upon the principle laid down in this context in the aforesaid decisions of 1967 and 1999 rendered by their lordship of Supreme Court . Their Lordship in the first case ruled that ifthe DE held to be not fair, the management must produce the evidence afresh in the manner normally adduced before the tribunal and it is not the proper way to tender the record of evidence led before the DE and ask the tribunal to treat it as evidence before it . Their Lordship in the aforesaid Second case at para 26 of the said decision in this connection led down theprinciple as under:-

evidence' so as to be acted by this tribunal in order to prove the charges of misconduct against the first party. The management before this tribunal was required to lead fresh evidence not again and again harping upon the above said confessional statements made by the first party which have been retracted by the first party onthe ground that they have been taken from him under force , coercion , threats and promise . As seen above , there is no independent oral or documentary evidence much less the evidence already brought on record to speak to the charges of misconduct leveled against the firstparty. The allegations made against him in the charge - sheet have remained to be proved by any circumstantial or direct evidence . The decisions cited on behalf of the management are not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case . In the first case of 1995 the Labour Court set aside the dismissal order passed by the bank on the ground that amount of misappropriation has been paid back to the customer and that workman belonged to Schedule Tribe and the should be given an opportunity to reform himself. If he charges in the instant case were proved against the first party by any other evidence except his making payment ofRs . 4000/- as per Ex.M18, then the principle laid down in the said ruling would have come into play not other- wise. In the second case i . e . D. Padmanabadhu Vs. Bank of India and Another , the charges of misconduct were . proved and it was found that Labour Court was not correct in taking lenient view on quantum of punishment . In the instant case charges are not proved . In the 3rd case, AIR 2000 SC 3129, their Lordship held the view thatirrespective of the fact that misappropriated amount is small or large, reinstatement of the workman against whom charges of misappropriation has been proved was bad in law. Once again the principle laid down in the said case would have been applicable if charges were proved in the present case . Therefore , in the light ofthe above, I am of the considered view that the management has failed to establish the charges of misconduct leveled against the first party. Hence the reference is answered and following award is passed .

AWARD

"The record pertaining to the domestic enquiry would not constitute ' fresh evidence ' as those proceedings have already been found by the Labour Court to be defective . Such record would also not constitute 'material on record ' as contended by the counsel for the respondent within the meaning of Section 11A at the enquiry proceedings , on being foundto be bad, have to be ignored altogether. The proceedings of the domestic enquiry could be , and were in fact relied upon by the management for the limited purpose of showing at the preliminary state that the action taken against the appellant wasjust and proper and that full opportunity ofhearingwas given to her in consonance with the principles of natural justice . This contention has not been accepted by the Labour Court and the enquiry has been held to be bad . In view of the nature of objections raised by the appellant, the record of enquiry held by the Management ceased to be 'material on record within the meaning of Section 11A of the Act and the only course open to the Manager was to justify its action by leading fresh evidence as required by the Labour Court . If such evidence has been led, the management has to suffer the consequences . "

The management is directed to reinstate the first partyin service with full back wages from the date of dismissal till the date of reinstatement , minus the amount already paid to him by way of Interim Relief withcontinuityof service and all other consequential benefits . No order to cost .

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 14th February, 2006)

14. Therefore , if we go by the above said observations of apex court , the so called confessional statement said to have been made by the first party in Ex . M16 , M3 and M7 relied upon by the management now before this tribunal cannot be said to be ' fresh

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

नई दिल्ली , 24 फरवरी , 2006

का. आ. 1066. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 347/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-2-2006 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -12012/22/2004- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 24th February, 2006 S.O. 1066.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 347 / 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Indian OverseasBank and their workman, received by the Central Government on 24-2-2006.

[No. L- 12012/22/2004- IR(B-II)] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHENNΑΙ Wednesday, the 21st December, 2005 PRESENT : K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 347/2004

Inthe matter ofthe dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Indian Overseas Bank and their workman)

BETWEEN:

Sri K. Ragupathy : IParty/Petitioner

AND

II Party/Management TheGeneral Manager, : Indian Overseas Bank , Chennai .

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman

: M/s . C.R. Chandrasekaran, Advocates

For the Management : M/s . N.G.R. Prasad, Advocates

2407

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L- 12012/ 22/2004 - IR (B - II) dated 31-05-2004 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication . The Schedule mentioned dispute is as follows:-

"Whether the action of the management of Indian OverseasBank in terminating the services of Shri K. Ragupathy, Ex - messenger, Chennai is legal and justified? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to?"

2.After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 347/2004 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim statement are briefly as follows :-

The Petitioner joined the services of Respondent/ Bank asmessenger at Tiruthani branch on 2-2-96 and he has been posted to Manavala Nagar branch and again Tiruthani and also posted at Irungattukottai . He continuouslyworked from 2-2-96 to 31-5-2002 and he was asked orally not to report for duty from 1-6-2002 and no reasonwas assigned for his termination. Thus, the Petitioner has served long uninterrupted period of more than six years and therefore , the order of termination passed by the Respondent/Management is illegal and non - est. No compensation or no notice was given to him and therefore , the Respondent/Bank has not followed the mandatory provisions of Industrial Disputes Act. While serving the Respondent/Bank as messenger , the Petitioner's duties included attending the clearing work of instrument to various banks and besides that he has gone to Regional Office/Central Office to deliver letters and also periodically bringing stationery items from Regional Office and all these duties were performed by him besides performing other messengerial duties . He used todo the duties of cash peonand those ofdaftry like assisting cashier at the branch in stitching currency notes , transporting cash box to and for the safe room, stitching voucher bundles and stacking them chronologically. Further, the Petitioner has also attended clerical duties such as making entries in passbooks , writing of statements amd despatching letters . Since the Petitioner has worked continuously for more than six years the order of termination is illegal . Therefore, he prays this Tribunal to pass an award holding that the order oftermination is illegal and prays for relief ofreinstatement with effect from the date of termination and also consequential relief.

4. As against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that the Petitioner was employed on daily wage basis at Irungattukottai branch of Respondent/Bank from 9-12-98 @ Rs . 40 for attending to 2408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] sundry works and attending as casual messenger for one way clearing. Since his appointment was irregular, he is not entitled to claim for regular post . No doubt , before engaging at Irungattukottai branch , he was engaged at Tiruthani branch and also at Manavala Nagar branch on dailywage basis. But, he was given work when only regular messenger was on leave . The Petitioner was an illegal entrant and he was disengaged from 31-5-2002 on the ground that regular candidate was appointed on compassionate grounds . The Petitioner was employed as additional messenger in addition to the messenger Mr. G. Dharman. It is false to allege that the Petitioner worked continuously in the Respondent/Bank . The Petitioner was engaged only for specific periods and therefore, he was not employed continuously without any break . It is also false to allege that he has done clerical work in the Respondent/Bank , as per their policy decision the Respondent/Bank has taken only candidates sponsored by Employment Exchange and unfortunately, the Petitioner was not selected through this process . Since the Petitioner was engaged only on daily casua! basis , he cannot claim reinstatement . The Supreme Court and High Courts have held that appointment to permanent service must be made in terms of recruitment rules and further , for the said purpose, there must exist a vacancy, and a person appointed through back door , that is not inconformity with the rules , could not claim permanency in service . Therefore, for all these reasons , the Respondent prays to dismiss the claim of the Petitioner with costs.

5. In these circumstances , the points for my consideration are--

(i) " Whether the action of the Respondent/ Management in terminating the services ofthe Petitioner is legal andjustified? "

(ii) " To what relief the Petitioner is entitled? "

POINT NO . 1 : ---

6. In this case , it is admitted fact that the Petitioner worked under Respondent/Management from 10-9-1998 to 31-5-2002 and he has worked at Tiruthani , Manavala Nagar, Irungattukottai branches of the Respondent/Bank . The Petitioner examined himself as WWÎ and he alleged that he has worked continuously without any interruption . Even though Sunday is a holiday, the Respondent paid wages for Sundays also . Further, even for other holidays , they have paid salary to him. Besides the work of messenger, the Petitioner alleged that he has done the work of clearing , stitching of cash bundles and vouchers and other works . It is his further evidence that every day, he starts from Sriperumputhur at 6.00 am and reaches Chennai and collect inward clearing and again return to Irungattukottai at 9.00 am. He further stated that he used to collect returned cheques outward clearing cheques and again come to Central Clearing Office . Then , he used to return to bank branch at 1.00 pm and he will do the work till 8.00 pm or the Manager leaves the branch . This evidence of the Petitioner has not been

challenged by the Respondent and he was not cross examined by the Respondent . Further, learned counsel for. the Petitioner argued that Petitioner filed an I. A. No. 23/2005 for production of documents and sought for certain documents from the Respondent and this Tribunal had ordered for production of documents, but the Respondent/ Management has not produced the documents sought for by the Petitioner . The documents are charges register maintained at Tiruthani branch of the Respondent/Bank during the period between February, 1996 and December. 1998 charges vouchers maintained at Tiruthani branch of the Respondent/Bank relating to payment of wages received by Petitioner during the period between February. 1996 and December, 1998 ; secondly, charges register maintained at Tiruthani branch of the Respondent/Bank between February, 1996 and December, 1998 ; thirdly the Petitioner wanted charges register maintained at Tiruthani branch on the Respondent/Bank during the period between December, 1998 and May, 2002. Similarly, he wanted charges vouchers maintained at Tiruthani branch of the Respondent/Bank representing payment of wages received by Petitioner during the period between December , 1998 and May, 2002 and he also wanted charges register maintained at Tiruthani branch of the Respondent/Bank during the period between December , 1998 and May, 2002 letter written by Irungattukkotai branch to Thiruthani branch dated 25-3-2000 regarding Petitioner's work as messenger, and he sought for a letter in reply written by Tiruthani branch to Irungattukottai branch dated 25-3-2000 detailing the Petitioner's work at Tiruthani branch and Manavalanagar branch as temporary messenger. But the Respondent/Bank has not produced any document nor stated any valid reason for not producing these documents . Under such circumstances , the Petitioner has established that he has worked for more than six years continuously in theRespondent/Bank as a messenger and therefore , the oral disengagement by the Respondent/ Bank was without following the mandatory provisions of I.D. Act , which is illegal and void ab initio . Learned counsel for the Petitioner further relied on the rulings reported in 1994 II LLJ 320 RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF MADYA PRADESH AND OTHERS wherein the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in a case where the question arises with regard to appointment was invalidly made or not in that case , it has held that " even if the Petitioners were considered probationers in that case too compliance with Section 25F was mandatory" and the Division Bench further held that " invalid appointment is not one of the exceptions found in Section 2(oo) of the Act . Any termination not falling under any of the exclusionary clauses of the said section would amount to clear retrenchment and for such termination compliance of pre - requisites of Section 25F is necessary " and it ordered that order of termination and notice is illegal . Relying on this decision , learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that even assuming that Petitioner was appointed as temporary messenger on daily [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2409

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

Witnesses Examined :-

Forthe I Party/Petitioner : WW1 Sri K. Raghupathy basis, the termination of the Petitioner without following the mandatory provisions is illegal , void and ab initio and therefore, the Petitioner is entitled to the prayer of reinstatement and also the relied claimed by him.

: None

For the Respondent/ Management

Documents Marked :-

: Nil

Oneither side

नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी, 2006 7. As against this , learned counsel for the Respondent contended that in 1999 II LLJ 1173 CALCUTTA TRAMWAYS COMPANY LTD . AND OTHERS VS. RAMESH AND 17 OTHERS , the Calcutta High Court has held that " appointment to permanent service must be in terms of recruitment rules and for the said purpose there must exist a vacancy. A person appointed through back door that is not inconformity with the rules, could not claim permanency in service . " In this case , the Petitioner has not been appointed as per recruitment rules of Respondent/ Bank and his appointment is only illegal . Under such circumstances , he cannot claim the relief of reinstatement . Further, he was appointed only as a daily wager and therefore, the relief of reinstatement cannot be given to the Petitioner.

का. आ. 1067.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-2- 2006 को प्राप्त हुआ था । :

[सं ० एल-12012/64/ 2002- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 24th February, 2006

S.O. 1067. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. (33/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour CourtBangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-2-2006.

8. On considering the facts adduced by WWI and considering the fact that the Respondent has not produced the documents ordered by this Tribunal , I find if those documents are produced before this Tribunal , it will prove the case of the Petitioner and that is why, the Respondent has not produced these documents . In such circumstances, it is clear that the Petitioner has established his contention that he has worked as a messenger in the Respondent/ Bank from the year 1996 till his termination namely 31-5-2002. Thus , he has worked for more than six years and while terminating his services, the Respondent has not followed the mandatory provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act . Thus, I find the action of the Respondent/Bank in terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and not justified.

4 POINT NO . 2:-

No. L- 12012/64/2002 - IR(B- II)] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy. ANNEXURE

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled?

CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated: the 16th February, 2006 PRESENT: Shir A.R. SIDDIQUI, PresidingOfficer C.R. NO . 33/2002

9. Inview ofmy foregoing findings , I find the order oftermination passed by the Respondent/Management is not legal and justified and the Petitioner is entitled to the reliefof reinstatement into service . But , with regard toback wages , there is no evidence from the side of the Petitioner that he has been without anyjob from the date oftermination till this date. Even though the Petitioner is entitiled to back wages , ends ofjustice would be met with, ifhalfof the back wages is ordered to the Petitioner in the circumstances of this case . No Costs .

IIParty

IParty

10. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 21st December, 2005.)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Shri H. Govinda Swamy, No. 620 , 1 ' A' Main Road, Meenakshi Nagar, KHB Colony, Magadi Road , Bangalore-560079

TheDy.General Manager, CanaraBank, CircleOffice, M.G. Road, Bangalore- 560001 64395 / 06-24 2410

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18, 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredby clause (d) of sub- section 2A ofthe Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order . No. L- 12012/ 64/2002 - IR ( B - II) dated 10th July 2002 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"whether the management of Canara Bank is justified by dismissing Shri H. Govindaswamy, Clerk, from service w.e.f. 8-7-2000 ? If not, what relief the later is entitled to and from which date .

2.While, challenging the dismissal order, and the findings of the enquiry holding him guilty of the charges ofmisconduct, the first party in his Claim Statement also challenged the enquiry proceedings on various grounds interalia contending that enquiry conducted against him was biased in favour of the management and that it was conducted in violation of principles of natural justice denying him sufficient opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The management by its Counter Statement however, maintained and asserted that a reasonable opportunity was given to the first party to defend himself and he infact attended enquiry proceedings by cross- examining the management witnesses and leading his own defence evidence and therefore , the enquiry was in accordance with principles of natural justice . Keeping in view the respective contentions of the parties , this tribunal on 7-6-2004framed a preliminary issue as under:

"Whether the Domestic enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second Party is fair and proper"?

3. During the course of trial of the said issue, the management examined enquiry officer as MW1 and got marked 9 documents at Ex. MI to M9 . First party examined himself as WWI without getting marked any document. After hearing the learned counsels for the respective partics on the above said issue , this tribunal by its order dated 29-6-2005 recorded a finding to the effect that DE conducted by the management against the first party is fair and proper. Thereupon the matter was posted to hear the respective counsels on the point of alleged perversity of the findings and the quantum of the punishment . Learned counsel for the first party submitted his Written Argument as well as advanced oral arguments . Learned counsel for the management inade his oral arguments .

4.Learned counsel for the first party in his argument attacked the findings of the enquiry as perverse and arbitrary on many grounds making reference to the oral and documentary evidence produced during the course of enquiry. He contended that out of 9 witnesses examined to prove the charges , 6 witnesses were the officials of the bank and 3 witnesses were Courier Staff. They have all

favoured the management being interested witnesses. He contended that the witness, MW1 though was on leave on 15-5-1998 , his statement was relied upon, statements of MW2, Smt . Leela Sudhakar was also acted upon despite her admissions about the irregularities found in the letter at Ex . M9 sent to the management branch from French Express Courier service run by the said lady. He contended that enquiry officer was also not right in relying upon the testimony of MW3 and MW4 , the courier staff keeping in view their statements in cross- examination and he referred to their relevant statements . He also contended that the statements of MW5 and MW8 the officers of the bank in giving their joint statement and the Ex. MEX, 11 to the Investigation Officer was not worth credence as they were not examined by the Investigation Officer MW9 and that their statements speaking to the fact that account holder Smt . Sarala Amalorapavam who realized the amount in question had given the name of the first party before the Police was an hearsay evidence and not to be acted upon being made before the police and that the statement not being recorded by the Investigation Officer. Learned counsel submitted that the bill/invoice at Ex . MEX , 10 submitted by the said Courier service on 2-6-1998 is not a reliable document due to omission of five covers taken by themon 15-5-98 and double entry ofcover sent ofTumkur, Likewise MEX. 9 should not have been considered being a fabricated document issued by the Courier service on 26-10-98 after the incident was noticed by the bank. He submitted that the statement of MW9 as Investigation Officer and his report would make it clear that the then Manager, Shri Guruprasad had responded to the branch officer with IBA No. 14706 dated 19-5-1998 under the instruction ofShri B.G. Kini , Sr. Manager without following the guidelines of the circular dated 29-4-94 and circular dated 31-1-1997 where under the branch was supposed to have a close watch over the newly opened accounts during the first six months specially the transactions amounting to huge amounts and that in the case of transaction involving OSC's involving Rs . 10 lakhs and above , the bankwas supposed to remit the realization proceeds through crossed demand draft only. He contended that the enquiry officer simply ignored those two circulars and also the observations made by MW1 in his Investigation Report passed against Shri Guruprasad and Kini who were the main responsible persons in causing loss to the bank to the tune ofRs . 18 lakhs and more in disregard to the above said circulars and guidelines issued by the head office of the management. He submitted that a poor clerk nainely the first party, who was working only in a tappal branch has been implicated by issuing the chargesheet for the alleged misconduct and those officers of the bank who actually cleared the payment in favour of said Smt . Sarala within 20 days of opening of fresh account with the Kunningham branch have been left of and Shri Kini has been sent him by giving him the benefit of VRS . His next contention was that merely because first party remained 2411 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

7. In order to appreciate the respective contentions of the parties it is worthwhile to bring on record the very charge sheet issued against the first party running as under:-

Charge Sheet

absent from duty, that too, on leave and rejoined the duty by producing a Anticipatory Bail order, the management cannotjump to the conclusion that the first party since was involved in the incident did not attend the bank absconding himself till the date he received the Anticipatory Bail order. Learned counsel submitted that the charges against the first party that he handed over only 14 covers to the Courier staff MW4 on 15-5-98 holding back the cover containing the cheque in question without sending it to the main branch , Bellary and that on 16-5-1998 when another courier boy MW3 visited the bank handed over him other two covers including one containing the cheque and thereafter made a false entry in the courier inward register at Ex. M 18 making it to appear that advice for the said cheque has been received , was not worth credence and reliable and even otherwise it cannot be said that he perpetrated fraud on the bank in order to see that said Smt . Sarala received the amount from the bank against the cheque tenderedby her. Therefore, learned counsel submitted that the findings of the enquiry holding the workman guilty of the charges of misconduct in playing fraud upon the bank in getting the above said cheque amount released in favour of said Smt . Sarala were not at all based on sufficient and legal evidence and therefore , suffered from perversity and in the result the dismissal order passed on the basis of those findings is illegal and void abinitio and therefore , first party is entitled to the reliefsought for.

5. Whereas , the learned counsel for the management in his written arguments submitted that the evidence brought on record before the enquiry officer in the oral testimony of 9 witnesses and 18 documents marked at Ex. MEX. 1 to 18, was legal and sufficient to prove the charges . His arguments was that almost all the allegations made in the charge sheet have been proved and established beyond reasonable doubt and the findings submitted by the enquiry officer holding the workman guilty of the charges are supported by the evidence brought on record and by cogent reasonings given by him in coming to the aforesaid conclusion . He invited attention of this tribunal to the the evidence brought on record before the enquiry officer and the findings given by him in holding the workman guilty of the charges .

6. On the point of quantum of punishment in the cases ofmisappropriation of the funds of the bank , learned counsel cited the following rulings:

1. 2004 107 FJR P 535 SC

2. AIR 2000 SCP3129

3. 1995 ( 1 ) LLJ Kar P. 233

4. 1995 ( 1 ) LLJ DB Kar P 1076

5. 1998 SCC (L& S ) P 1129 SC

6. AIR 2000 SCP 3028

"You are working as a Clerk at our LB & PSM Section, Circle Office , Bangalore , since 16th November 1998. Earlier your were working as Clerk at ourCunningham Road Branch, Bangalore, from 10-1-1997 to 3-11-1998 . On 15-5-1998 , you were handling thetappal department at our Cunningham Road Branch, Bangalore . On that day, you had delivered 14 covers to the representative of M/s . French Express Courier, Shri Arokya Rajan, who had acknowledged for having collected 14 items . There were actually 16 covers on that day tobe delivered to the Courier, out of which 3 covers meantfor Chickballapur were put in a single cover, making the total number of covers to 14. Under Sr. No. 16 you have cancelled the original entry of OSC 27315/98 against the cancelled entry of Sl. No. 16 in the Courier Register . On 16-5-1998 , when adifferent courier boy, namely Shri Pradeep from M/s . French Express Courier had come to take delivery of the courier covers , you have compelled the courier boy to alter the figures of previous day i.e. 15-5-98 to 14+ 2 = 16 . The courier boy had altered the figure as instructedby you . The courier agency have also confirmed non receipt of any cover addressed to Main Branch , Bellary, on 25-5-1998 , which was evident from the list given by them containing the details of the covers received by the courier agency during the month of May 1998. Apart from this while deposing before the police authorities , Smt . Sarala Amalorpavan, Customer having SB accountNo. 31957 with our Cunningham Road Branch, Bangalore , in the presence of Shri T. M. Bhat, Chief Manager, Shri D. Muralinarayan , Senior Manager, has/stated that you have assured your assistance in encashing the cheque for Rs . 18.50 lakhs which was sent f or collection by the branch. on 15-5-1998 for credit of her account . You have absconded immediately after the fraud came to light and the police were on the look out for you , suspecting your involvement in the fraud . You remained absent from duties from 9-10-1998 to 2- 11-1998 and produced a copy of the anticipatory bail obtained by you on the date ofjoining duties. The alterations in the Tappal Register , the statement of Courier boy that you got acknowledgement for the disputed cheque on a later date, the depositions of the account holder before the police authorities in the presence of branch officials and your absconding from the 7. 1999 (2) LLJP 155 SC

64361 /06-25 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

ز

caseofthe managements that thereupon in the courier inward register the first party made a false entry purporting to the receipt of the advice from main branch Bellary for clearance ofthe cheque and it is based on that entry proceeds of the cheque were released by the bank and were realized by Smt. Sarala and thereby the first party played fraud upon the bank causing loss to the tune of Rs . 18.50 lakhs. The other two allegations as noted above , are that he remained absent from duty from 9-10-1998 to 2-11-1998 after the incident came to light and rejoined the duty by producing anticipatory bail . The next allegation is that said Sarala in the presence of MW 5 and MW 8 , the Manager and the Sr. Manager made statement before the police involving the first party in helping her to realize the said cheque amount,

dutics besides obtaining anticipatory bail lead us to believe that you have actively involved in the perpetration of fraud on the bank. Thus , you have acted in a manner which is unbecoming of a bank employee, by assisting the party to fraudulently withdraw a sum of Rs . 18.47 lakhs from her SB account out of a non existent/ non realized collection item . You have thus exposed the bankto huge financial losses. An explanation in this regard was called from you vide staff section (0) Circlc Office,Bangalore letter No. BLC : SSO : 5034 :EP: 99 dated 1-1-1999 and the reply submitted by you was neither convincing nor satisfactory. You have thus committed gross misconduct within the meaning of Chapter XI Regulation 3 Clause ( 1) of Canara Bank Service Code . Your actions being prejudicial to the interest ofthe bank, you have also committed gross misconduct within the meaning of Chapter XI Regulation 3 Clause ( m ) of Canara Bank Service Code."

9. After making refernce to the statements of MW 1 to 9 in detail along with the documents at Ex . MEX. 1 to 18, the learned enquiry officer under the heading ' analysis of evidence and findings ' from pages 13 to 16 assigned the following reasonings in holding the workman guilty of the charges .

Analysis of Evidence and Findings

I have perused the charge sheet , proceedings of the enquiry, depositions and documentary evidence brought on record during the course of the enquiry and after careful consideration of the evidence , findings are as under :--

It is not disputed that Shri H. Govindaswamy was working in the Tappal Department at Cunningham Road, Bangalore branch on 15-5-98 . As per MEX-4, i . e. the statement of Shri H. Govindaswamy, he has admitted that he was working in the Tappal Department during the relevant period. It is on record that on 15-5-98 Shri H. Govindaswamy had delivered 14 covers to the Representative Shri Arokia Rajan of M/s. Amrutha Associates , Franchise ofM/ s . French ExpressCourier, who had acknowledged for having colleted 14 items .

It isalso allged that on 16-5-1998 when Shri Pradeep , Courier boy had come to take delivery of the courier covers . Shri H. Govindaswamy had compelled the courier boy to alter the figures of previous day, i.e. 15-5-1998 and '14 +2 = 16 ' . Shri Pradeep had altered the figures as instructed by him . The Courier Agency has confirmed non receipt of any cover addressed to Bellary Main branch on 15-5-98 . Apart from this, Smt . Sarala Amalorpavam had informed the police authorities during her interrogation about the involvement of Shri H. Govindaswamy encashing the cheque for Rs . 18.50 lakhs which was sent for collection of the branch on 15-5-98 for credit of her account . Thereafter, he absoconded immediately after the fraud came to light and remained absent 8. From the reading of the above said charge sheet , it can be seen that there are mainly 4 set of allegations levelled against the first party to substantiate the misconduct committed by him for the realization of the amount in question in favour of said Smt. Sarala . Now let us see what are the reasonings assigned by the Enquiry Officer in coming to the conclusion that all the aforesaid 4 allegations made against the first party have been proved against him to point out that he was involved in getting the cheque amount released in favour of Smt . Sarala cleared from the bank. The fact undisputed are that on 15-5-1998 a cheque bearing No. 206497 dateed 11-5-1998 for Rs . 18.50 lakhs drawn on Syndicate Bank Market Road, Bellary was deposited for collection in SB account No. 31957 of Smt . SaralaAmalorpavam and cheque was lodged against OSC No. 27315/98 and the realization proceeds purported to have been sent by the Bellary Main Branch by IBA 14706. dated 19-5-1998 were found to be fraudulently withdrawn by said Smt . Sarala . The main allegation against the first partyby the management is that while he was dealing with Tappal Courier department on 15-5-1998 he delivered 14 covers to the Courier boy of French Express Courier by name Shri Arogya Swami and the boy after having colleted those 14 covers acknowledged for having received the same . The management contended that originally there were 16 covers on that day out of which 3 covers were meant to Chickballapur were put in single cover making the total as 14 covers and they were handed over to said courier boy. It is alleged that the first party cancelled entry against Sr. No. 16 in the Courier register addressed to main branch , Bellary and on 16-5-98 when a diffcrent courier boy, Pradeep.came to take delivery of the courier covers he compelled him to alter the figures of the previous day ( 15-5-98 ) as courier covers handed over were 14+ 2 = 16 and the courier boy obliged the first party in altering the figures . It is further the [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

fromduties from 9-10-98 to 2-11-98 and after obtaining anticipatory bail , he joined the duties .

The Investigation Officer, Shri V. R. Iyengar, who has been examined as MW 9 , has confirmed the involvement of Shri H. Govindaswamy for the reasons that there were alterations in the Courier Registerwith regard to the covers handed over the courier boy. The cover to be sent to Bellary main branch was not actually handed over to the courier boyson 15-5-98 and on the next day i.e. 16-5-98 Shri H. Govindaswamy froced the courier boy Shri Pradeep to alter the number of covers and affix his signature . Apart from this , Shri H. Govindaswamy hadmade in entry in the inward Courier Regsister, as if a branch advice was received from Bellary vide MEX. 18. Shri H. Govindaswamy also remained absconding from duties from the day the branch registered a police complaint and when the police were in search of him, and only after obtaining the anticipatory bail , the CSE has reported for duties and his enquiries with Bellary branches reveal that they have not received the OSC purported to have been sent by Cunningham Road Branch to this regard.

The above facts made the I.O. to come to the conclusion about the involement of Shri H. Govindaswamy in the fraudulent encashment of Rs . 18.50 lakhs. MEX . 1 , the investigating Report submitted by Shri V. R. lyengar clearly shows that Smt. Sarala Amalorpavam opened a SB account with the assurance by Shri H. Govindaswamy that he would help/ assist in encashing the cheque of Rs . 18.50 lakhs with an intention to cheat the Bank. The party was already having an account at our Fraser Town, Bangalore branch . The cheque No. 204697 drawn on SB account holder of Syndicate Bank.Bellary, lodged under OSC 27315/98 on 15-5-98 was never sent to Bellary branch . Shri H. Govindaswamy managed to add the courier cover entry in the Outward Courier Register after entry of the 14th cover and forced the courier boy on 16-5-98 to change the number as '14 + 2= 16 ' to suit his convenience . The alterations in the serial numbers in the outward register are made by Shri H. Govindaswamy. The I.O. is of the view that since the cheque is not at all sent to Bellary, in all probability, Shri H. Govindaswamy has parted with the Branch Advice(computer stationery ) with an intention to commit fraud. The report is also clear that Shri H Govindaswamy has managed to enter the branch advice with BA No. 14706 dated 19-5-98 for Rs . 18.50 lakhs in the inward courier register which is in his own handwriting,to impress that it came in the normal course inthe courier tappal and thereafter sent to the concerned section for delivery against acknowledgement . In addition to this , the Inward courier covers and acknowledgement slips are not maintained

2413 by Shri H. Govindaswamy has taken advantage of certain loopholes in the internal control of the branch , and taken advantage in perpetration of fraudulent withdrawal of Rs . 18.50 lakhs in collusion with others .

During the investigation it is confirmed that the courier boys , at the instance of Shri H. Govindaswamy, Shri Pradeep has added '+2' and put his signature without rounding off the number, and in fact , he had not received any cover from Shri H. Govindaswamy on 16-5-1998 . MEX- 1 clearly shows the involvement of Shri H. Govindaswamy in the fraudulent withdrawal ofRs . 18.50 lakhs. MEX, 2 dated 15-5-98 shows an entry ofOSC 27315/98 ofBellary Main, which is in the handwriting of Shri H. Govindaswamy.

The depositions of Shri Pradeep , the courier boy clearly shows that at the instance of Shri H. Govindaswamy, he added ' +2 ' in the register and signed the same without rounding off the entry, which normally he does for the covers received by him. Since Shri H. Govindaswamy had insisted on him to write, he has written the same in MEX.2 . Similarly, Shri Arokia Rajan, the other courier boy in his statement has confirmed that he has received 14 covers on 15-5-98 from Shri Govindaswamy, and accordingly, he has signed and the signatures are appearing on MEX 2. During the cross examination also, he has confirmed that he has received only 14 documents and as such , he has written 14 and thereafter put his signature. He had emphatically confirmed that at the time of receiving it was only 14 documents as mentioned by him. Apart from this , Smt. Leela Sudhakar, proprietress of M/s Amrutha Associates , Franchise of M/ s . French Express , Courier division , clearly confirmed that Shri Pradeep the courier boy had informed her that when he had called on the branch on 16-5-1998 , for delivery, he was asked by Shri H. Govindaswamy, Clerk to add '+2 ' in respect of the previous days entry which was received by Shri Arokia Rajan, the other courier boy. Initially Shri Pradeep had declined to concede to his request , but at the instance of Shri H. Govindaswamy he had added ' +2 ' without rounding offthe number, stating that after ascertaining from Shri Arokia Rajan, he would round off the same.

Inthe cross examination also , Smt . Leela Sudhakar has confirmed the same and MEX- 9 , the letter dated 26-10-1998 addressed to Cunningham Road Branch which is signed by her , gives the correct version , and the same was prepared after due verification with her manager and records . Though there are some discrepancies in the version of MEX- 10, MEX- 9 gives the correct version. The depositions of Smt . Leela 2414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

Sudhakar , corroborated by the depositions of Shri Pradeep and Arokia Rajan and the documentary evidence marked during the enquiry, clearly establish that Shri Pradeep , at the instance of Shri H. Govindaswamy, has added ' +2 ' to the entry of 15-5-98 wherein the OSC No. 27315/98 is added without handing over the covers to the courier boy. Itisalso corroborated by the depositions of Shri V.R. Iyengar (MW9 ) and as per his report MEX - 1.

The depositions of Shri T.M. Bhat and Shri D. Muralinarayanan , MW5 & 8 , respectively, shows thatboth were interrogated by the police authorities . They have also confirmed that during the interrogation of Smt. Sarala by the police , she had initially declined to name the bank official who had assisted her for obvious reasons . However, on persistent interrogation by the police , Smt . Sarala has revealed the name of Shri H. Govindaswamy who had assisted here in encashing the cheque for Rs . 18.50 lakhs in the presence of Shri T.M. Bhat and Shri D. Muralinarayanan . MEX- 11 , the joint statement given by these officials clearly shows that Smt . Sarala in fact, informed the truth and involvement of Shri H. Govindaswamy in encashing the cheque for Rs . 18.50 lakhs. Apart from this , MEX- 12, the letter ofBellary Main branch dated 21-11-98 clearly shows that OSC No. 27315/98 purported to have been sent by Cunningham Road Branch , was not received by them and IBA No. 14706 does not pertain to the transaction on 19-5-98. In fact , the said IBA number was given to Bidar Branch for realization of Tungabhadra Grameena Bank DD/BAR dated 16-5-98 . They have emphatically confirmed that the OSC No. 27315/98 dated 15-5-98 purported to have been sent from Cunningham Road , Bangalore branch was neither reccived by them nor the said branch advice emanated from Bellary Main branch . This clearly shows that being the Tappal Clerk , Shri H. Govindaswamy has managed to make an entry in the courier register for having sent the cover, which contained the cheque to Bellary Main branch, which infact was not done and the cover was not at all sent to Bellary main Branch . Apart from this , his handwriting in MEX- 18 for having received the OSC rcalization proceeds which is in his own handwriting, also confirms his involvement in this regard.

It is on record that the branch has lodged a police ' complaint on 9-10-98 about the fraudulent encashment ofRs . 18.50 lakhs . Incidentally, it is also on record that Shri H. Govindaswamy has remained absent unanthorisedly and he was absconding thereafter . MEX- 1 , MEX 16 & 17 clearly shows that Shri H. Govindaswamy remained absent from 9-10-98 to 2-11-98 for obvious reasons , and only after obtaining anticipatory bail , he has joined dutcis and

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] produced the anticipatory bail . This clearly shows that from the date of lodgement ofpolice complaint by the branch the CSE remained absent and his contention that he had gone to Chickmagalur in order to recover the cancard liability from one Shri Hiriyanna Gowda, is only an after thought, just to avoid the responsibility. The production of copies of bus tickets and counterfoil for having remitted Rs . 2000 in the account of Shri M. Hiriyanna Gowda does not absolve him of the charges proved against him . In fact, Shri Govindaswamy in his reply to the bank has stated that he was not well and as such , he remained abent . However, at this juncture , he has stated that he had gone to Chickmagalur in order to recover the Cancard liability as per the instructions of the Senior Manager and branch officials. However, Shrí T.M. Bhat, Chief Manager and Shri D. Muralinarayanan , thenSr. Manager have emphatically denied for having permitted Shri H. Govindaswamy to visit Chickmagalur in order to recover the cancard liability from Shri Hiriyanna Gowda. Therefore , the contention ofthe CSE for remaining absent particularly during the period and after lodging the complaint by the branch, does not merit any consideration.

For the reasons stated supra, and taking into account the documentary evidence brought on record, it is clearly established the involvement of H. Govindaswamy in encashing a cheque ofRs . 18.50 lakhs from the account of Smt. Sarala Amalorpavam , thereby exposing the Bank to huge financial loss. Therefore , I have no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that the charges levelled against H. Govindaswamy has been conclusively established and he has committed gross misconduct as mentioned in the chargeshect. The above acts of H. Govindaswamy are prejudicial to the interest of the Bank which are serious in nature , and therefore, he has also committed gross misconduct in this regard . "

10.Now therefore, in the light of the above , findings of the enquiry officer supported by evidence and reasonings and in view of the fact that DE is held to be fair and proper a very heavy burden cast upon the first party toestablish before this tribunal that findings suffered from perversity. As could be seen, it is neither the case of ' no evidence' or ' no legal evidence ' . As many as 9 witnesses were examined for the management including two Chief Managers , namely MW5 and MW8 apart from the Investigation Officer , MW9 . On the first allegation that the first party made alteration in the courier register with regard to the covers handed overto the courier boys namely, MW3 and MW4 , there is ample and sufficient evidence brought in the statements of the said two witnesses supported by the statement of MW2 , Smt . Lecla Sudhakar . Proprietrix of M/ s . Amrutha Associates ( Courier service) and the documents namely the letter dated 26-10-98 and 2415 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

his cross examination for the first party before the enquiry officer. It was not obligatory on the part of the enquiry officer to get expert's opinon about the said entry. It was also not felt necessary by hint since the inward courier register was under the charge of the first party and and it is he who was supposed to make entry in the said register . Moreover , it is not the case ofthe first party that somebody else in the bank had made such an entry. Therefore, these two allegations made in the charge shect have been proved by sufficient and legal evidence and findings of the enquiry on these two points in nty opinion did not suffer from perversity.

11. Now, coming to the other two allegations, namely the conduct of the first party in remaining absent from duty till he got the Anticipatory bail order and that said Smt . Sarala in the presence of MW5 & MW8 made a statement before the police involving the first party rather helping her in getting the said cheque cleared are not proved by the management by legal and sufficient evidence . The fact that first party attended the bank on 6-10-1998 and worked for half day and left the office without information and that on 12-10-1998 he attended the office signed the register and then worked for half day and left the office withouttaking the permission and that from 13-10-1998 onwards he remained absent till he was relieved from the branch in absentiam to report at SS ( W) BCO in terms of orderw.e.f. 3-11-98 and that he reported duty along with the Anticipatory Bail order only on 2-11-98 has been very much spoken to in the statement of MW8 and there is nothing worth elicited from him on this point to suggest otherwise . Statement of MW8 also gets support from the documents at Ex.MEX. 13. However, only because the first party remained absent from duty for few days and then reported back to duty along with Anticipartory Bail Order , no inference can be drawn that he was involved in the alleged fraud committed on the bank . May be that he had an apprehension ofbeing arrestedby the police after having come to know the fact that a police complaint was filed with regard to the said incident. Similarly the evidences of MW 5 & 8 coupled with their statemetns at Ex.MEX. 11 is not the evidence in the eye of law to suggest that first party was involved in committing fraud with regard to the cheque in question . It is said that said Smt . Sarala when was present along with MW5 & 8 in the Police Station , she disclosed the name of first party as a person who helped iver in gitting her cheque encashed. MW5 & 8 said to have made ajoint statement accordingly at Ex. MEX . 11 to MW9 and based on that statement the Investigation Officer confirmed the information that it was the first party who was involved for committing the fraud in question. First of all the above said statement , Ex . MEX . 11 as far as referring to the statement of Smt . Sarala was an hearsay evidence . Undisputedly MW9 neither recorded the statements of MW 5 & 8 nor recorded the statement of said Smt . Sarala . No sufficient explanation was offered by the Investigation Officer in not recording their statements during the course of the bill/ invoice dated 2-6-98 at Ex.MEX. 9 & 10 issuedby the said Courier service to the manager of Cunnigham branch . In the aforesaid testimony of MW2 to MW4 and the docilments at Ex . MEX. 9 artd 10, it has been very much brought out by the management that the first party altered the figures in the courier register with regard to the covers handed over by the first party to the courier boys . It has come in the evidence that on 15-5-1998 the first party handed over 14 covers instead of 16 covers to the courier boy by name Arokia Rajan holding back the two covers one containing the cheque in question meant to be sent to Bellary main branch . On 16-5-1998 when the other courier boyby name Pradeep came to the bank to collect Tappal , he compelled the said boy to make entry in the courier register with regard to the other two covers as if they were delivered to him on 15-5-98 itself. Learned counsel for the first party referred to certain statements of these two boys in their cross examination to discredit their evidence but in my opinion on the point in question their evidence has remained unshaken . There is no motive attributed to the evidence of said two boys as to why they should make a statentent against the first party . The arguments for the firstparty that the courier service since has got business with the bank, they have favoured the management , does not carry much weight . That apart as noted above , the lady who runs the said courier service also has been examined and she in no uncertain terms stated that their courier service rather MW3 and 4 have not received the cover containing the cheque meant to be delivered to Bellary main branch . Accordingly she has also given a letter at MEX.9 and the bill/invoice at Ex . M10 to speak to the fact thatthe cover meant for Bellary main branch has not been received by the said courier service to be delivered to the said branch . Therefore , there are not good reasons not to act upon the testimony of MW2 to 4 and the documents at Ex . MEX.9 and 10. The contention for the first partythat Ex.MEX. 10 is full of contradictions with regard to the Tappal received by the Courier service as some of the letters sent by the bank through the said courier service are not at all found in the said invoice is of no consequence . It may be that there are some contradictions in that respect but the fact that the cover meant to be sent to Bellary main branch has never been received by the said courier service remains very much established in the aforesaid documents and statements of MW2 to MW4. Allegation against the first party that he made a false entry in the courier register/book maintained by the bank purporting to have received the advice from the Bellary branch in respect of the said cheque again has been proved by sufficient evidence . The contention of the first party that he did not make any such entry and that the hand writing of the entry has not been subjected to experts opinion and therefore , such an entry cannot be acted upon is not very much acceptable , when the competent witnesses including the Investigation Officer have deposed to the said fact and their statement on the pointhas not been shaken very much during the course of

643 GI /2006-26 2416

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA:

investigation . Strangely enough these two responsible officers ofthe bank had given the above said statements without putting the date and it is here we cannot brush aside lightly the contention of the first party that it was a statement created to suit the management case . Therefore , findings of the enquiry officer on these two allegations made against the first party in my opinion are not supported by sufficient and legal evidence and therefore, suffered fromperversity.

12. Now a question arises as to whether the aforesaid misconduct committed by the first party in making alterations in the outward and inward courier registers is alone sufficient for the officers of the bank to release the cheque amount in favour of the said account holder. It is not in dispute that Smt . Sarala had opened her account withCunningham Road Branch despite here having account ofFrazerTownBranch of the management itself. It is not in dispute that the incident of clearance of the above said cheque had taken place just within 20 days of her opening ofthe account . As noted above , the above said two circulars called upon the bank officers to be on guard , in the cases of newly opened accounts for a period of six months specially on the transactions involving huge amounts and itis also made clear that whenever there is a transaction in respect of OSCs of Rs . 10 lakhs and above , the amount shall be reinitted through cross demand draft only. In the instant case the guidelines in the said two circulars have beenthrown to wind by the officers of the bank working at the relevant point oftime . The Investigation Officer in his report marked at Ex. MEX. I at page 5 relevant for the purpose made the following observations .

"The fraud came to light only after the reconciliation of entries in HO Summaries at IBAR Section . The branchadvice has been responded by Shri Guruprasad, Officer and signature of the signatory in the branch advice has been cancelled by Shri Guruprasad despite the fact that there is absolutely no similarity between the signatures appearing on the advice and specimen signature. He has nowhere stated that he obtained specific permission for responding the branch advice, from Shri B.G. Kini . Shri Guruprasad in his letter addressed to the Deputy General Manager has stated thathe responded the branch advice with IBA 14706 dated 17-5-1998 in the system as per the instructions ofShri B.G. Kini , Sr. Manager since the credit was in the form of Branch advice . He has also stated that Shri B.G. Kini was very particular to pass the creditto the said account as he had full information about the cheque sent for collection and he had verified with the lodge of the cheque which is being the sale proceeds of land/estate at Bellary and if credit is delayed it may turn into customers complaint as the amount was huge . He has also stated that he remembers to have frozen the debits in the said account forwant ofcertain clarifications ."

MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 13.His observations on page 8 with regard to the procedure to be followed in the cases like one on hand is asfollows:--

"Shri B.G. Kini , Senior Manager is not in order in permitting/ instructing Shri Guruprasad to credit the proceeds ofOSC basing on the information given by the account holder without compete verification of the fact. He could have contacted Bellary main branch over phone immediately to verify the genuineness of the branch advice before parting with the amount since the amount involved is huge . Since the account was newly opened and proceeds came by way of branch advice instead of DD and the amount was substantial , he should have handled thee situation carefully and diligently. "

14. Therefore, as argued for the first party had the then competent bank officers particularly Shri Guruprasad and Shri Kini followed the guidelines and the proper procedure required in clearing the realization proceeds , the fraud in question could not have happened. However, only because the aforesaid officers have not been vigilant and have cleared the realization proceeds towards the said cheque not adhering to the guidelines, the first party cannot be absolved of the deed of misconduct committed by him in falsification of the records of the bank. He may not have committed the actual fraud but certainly has made a attempt and preparations towards commission of the fraud bythe party concerned , of course , subject to the collusion by other officers of the bank . The misconduct committed by the first party also cannot be viewed leniently for the reason that in the banking institutions every word and figure in the bank ofaccounts, matters lot of importance. If the official ofthe bank himself is to induldge in falsification ofthe bank records, then the security of the bank towards the public money will be at stake . However, keeping in view of the fact that there is no direct nexus between the misconduct committed by the first party and the very realization ofproceeds of the cheque in favour of the above said account holder, that too, made by the officers of the barık indisregard to the guidelines and the minimum common prudence being exercised by them in not going through and ascertaining the actual advice generated by the first party and in not making required enquiry with Bellary main branch, it appears to me that ends ofjustice will be met if the punishment of dismissal awarded against the first party isconverted into the punishment of Compulsory retirement from the date of punishment order. Accordingly, the reference is answered and following Award is passed:

AWARD

The punishment of Dismissal ordered against the first party is converted into Compulsory Retirement from the date of original punishment order . No order to cost.

(Dictatedto PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 16th February, 2006)

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer 2417 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारंत का राजपत्र : मार्च 18 , 2006/फाल्गुम 27 , 1927

नई दिल्ली , 24 फरवरी , 2006

Tribunal for adjudication . The Schedule mentioned in that orderis:

"Whether the action of the management ofUnion Bank of India in terminating the services ofSmt. T. Parvathy with effect from 29-01-2002 is legal and justified? Ifnot, what relief is she entitled to?" का. आ. 1068. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 119/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-02-2006 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. After the receipt of the reference, it was taken on file as I. D. No. 119/2003 and notices were issued toboth theparties andboth the parties entered appearance through theiradvocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

[सं. एल -12012/45/2003- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th February, 2006

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:-

S.O. 1068.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 119/ 2003) of the Central Govt . Indus .Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Channai as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofUnion Bank ofIndia and their workman, received by the Central Government on 24-02-2006.

[No. L- 12012/45 /2003 -IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR, COURT CHENNAI

Monday, the 19th December , 2005

PRESENT

K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 119/2003

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Union Bank of India and their workman)

The Petitioner joined the services of II Party/ Management in its Besant Nagar branch on 30-10- 1998 as Casual sub- staff on daily wages and II Party/ Management instead of regularising her service illegally and unjustifiably terminated her from service on29-1-2002. Even the Petitioner's representations and also notices for which there was no response . Though the Petitioner had worked continuously without any break for more than three years the Respondent/ Management has not regularised her service and they have terminated her service which is totally arbitrary, illegal and unjustified. The Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days in each calendar year especially preceding one calendar year prior to her illegal termination . The Respondent has violated the mandatory provisions of Section 25 F, 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act: nd the persons who have joined service as Casual Labourers subsequent to the Petitioner have been regularised in service and they are still in service. The ac.ion of the Respondent is also in violation of circular issued by Central Office of theRespondent/Bank. Hence, the Petitioner prays that an award maybe passed to reinstate the Petitioner in service with continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits.

Smt. T. Parvathy

BETWEEN IParty/Petitioner AND

The Senior Manager (P) : II Party/Management Union Bank of India Chennai

APPEARANCES

Forthe Petitioner : M/s . K. M. Ramesh , Advocates

For the Management : M/ s . T. S. Gopalan &Co. Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L- 12012/45 /2003 - IR(B - II ) dated 13-6-2003/ 18-7-2003 has referred this industrial dispute to this

4. As against this, the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that the Respondent/Bank has fixed number of posts on each category for each branch and the appointments are made only after the senctioned posts . TheRespondent/Bank being a public sector undertaking . no one can gain entry into service of the bank by back door or influence or collusion or by taking advantage of any omission or failure on the part of its officers . Further, the sub - staff category was filled up by the Respondent/ Bank from among the candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange . It is not uncommon in the Respondent/Bank that on occasions like opening of a new branch, without the knowledge or authority of Regional Office, the concerned Branch Manager have engaged local personto attend the cleaning work and wages paid to them isdebited to general expenditure account. Such engagement isneither permitted or authorised and it will not be binding 2418

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

to close of banking hours . The Petitioner has worked between 30-10-98 to 29-1-02 on all working days . Hence . the Petitioner prays an award may be passed in her favour.

6. In these circumstances , the points for my consideration are-

(1) "Whether the action of the Respondent/Bank in terminating the services ofthe Petitioner with effect from 29-01-2002 is legal and jsutified?"

(ii) "To what relief the Petitioner is entitled ? "

Point No. 1:

7. The contention of the Petitioner is that she was engaged as a part -time employee of the Respondent/Bank from 30-10-98 to 29-1-2002 and on that date, the Respondent/ Bank without following rules and mandatory provisions has terminated her service and therefore , she has raised this dispute. On the other hand, the Respondent contended that the Petitioner was not engaged continuously for a period of three years and she has been engaged when the parmanent part - time sweeper attached to the branch was not available for cleaning the permises . It was only an ad- hoc arrangement till the regular part-time sweeper was posted and she was only attending cleaning of the premises and that too for an hour or two in a day and she is not entitled to the relief as claimed by her .

on the bank . On 30-10-1998 when the Respondent/Bank opened a branch at Besant Nagar, it has deployed the part time sweeper attached to Adyar branch to Besant Nagar, branch. When the part - time sweeper of Adyar branch was not available , the branch may have engaged the Petitioner for cleaning the premises. On 4-9-99 one Mrs. Sumathi, part -time sweeper attached to Adya : branch was posted to Besant Nagar branch. Though , it is a part of duties of regular part- time sweepers to clean the toilet, there is practice in some of the branches that they decline to attend the work ofcleaning the toilet and local person is engaaged for cleaning the toilet. On 4-3-2000 One Mr. Selvaraj, Daftry, Madras Main branch was posted as sub- staff to Besant Nager branch. The Petitioner was lastly engaged in Novembr, 2001. Her engagement was neither regular nor continuous but it is only an ad - hoc arrangement till regular part -time sweeper was posted. She was only attending to the cleaning of premises . Therefore, irregular engagement of the Petitioner was done by the local Manager on his own volition and the same could not create a right in her favour to claim employment . The Petitioner was not working continously. She was engaged to attend to cleaning work which was hardly for an hour or two. The Petitioner was not sponsored by Employment Exchange and she could not be considered for regularisation in the services ofRespondent/Bank. Merely, by reason of fact that she was engaged for some days by the Besant Nagar branch between 1998 and 2001 she could not be said to have been employed in the services of the Respondent/Bank. Further, her non- engagement could not amount to termination much less retrenchment wihtin the meaning of Section 2 (00) of theAct . There are only 30 vouchers evidencing the payment ofwages to Petitioner between 19-12-98 and 30-11-2001 which clearly shows the factual position about the days of her engagement. Now the Respondent/Bank is saddled with excess manpower and in the year 2001 it had put up a VRS , pursuant to which number of employees in all categories left their service and those vacancies are not filled up. Therefore , for all these reasons, theRespondent prays that the claim of the Petitioner may be dismissed with costs .

8. In order to substantiate her claim the Petitioner has examined herself as WW1 and produced documents Ex. W1 to W6 which are copy of payment vouchers for paymentofwages to her namely 15 which are marked as Ex. W1 series and copy of letter sent by her to Respondent/ Bank as Ex . W2, copy of legal notice issued by Petitioner as Ex. W3 . Again on 19-4-2002 she has issued legal notice. copy ofwhich is marked as Ex. W4. Copy of the dispute raised by Petitioner before Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) is marked as Ex. W5 and copy of reply submitted by II Party/ Management is marked as Ex. W6 . As against this , the Respondent/Management examined one Mr. R. Prabakhar, who is working as Senior Manager (P) as MW1 and marked 3 documents as Ex. M1 to M3 , Ex . Ml is the copy of statement showing cash payment details made to Petitioner from 6-11-98 to 30-1-01 . Ex. M2 and M3 are copy of transfer orders issued to Mrs. T. Sumathi and Sri M. Selvaraj respectively, who were posted Besant Nagar branch.

5. Again, the Petitioner in the rejoinder stated that it is not true and correct to say that the II Party/Management wasappointing persons only against sanctioned posts. In reality the persons like the Petitioner are engaged for doing sweeping and scavenging work in almost all branches of the Respondent/Bank , It is also now well settled that for menial jobs , the question of sponsoring by Employment Exchange does not arise . It is false to allege that the Petitioner was engaged in Besant Nagar branch only on the days the regular part - time sweeper of Adyar Branch was not available . On the other hand , the Petitioner was engaged continuously without any break whatsoever. It is also not true to say that the petitioner was not engaged afterNovember, 2001. The Petitioner was terminated only on 29-1-2002 and till such time, she was engaged regularly. ThePetitioner was working in the branch right from morning

9. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that in I. A. No. 47/2004 this Tribunal has ordered the Respondent to produce muster roll of Besant Nagar for the years 1998 to 2002 and also permitted the Petitioner's advocate to go and inspect the documents before the Respondent / Management. But , the Respondent/Management though have shown some of the documents , have not produced the entire documents for perusal and have not produced the muster roll , even after the order passed by this Tribunal and in such circumstances , and adverse inference can be drawn against the Respondent/Management to the effect 2419 [भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18 , 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

case of Workmen of American Express International Banking Corporation and as such, if we calculate the number of days worked by the Petitioner, it must have been more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months . Under such circumstances , the prayer for reinstatement is to be allowed . "

that ifthe documents are produced before this Tribunal , it will be against the interest of the Respondent/Management. Further, during the inspection of the Petitioner's advocate, the Petitioner's advocate has prepared a statement and the said statements are marked as Ex . W11 and W12 . Further , the petitioner's advocate has also marked copy of reply submitted by II Party/Management before Assistant LabourCommissioner (Central) dated 21-10-2002 as Ex .W7 and copy of notice issued by Respondent's advocate to Respondent as Ex.W8 and copy of notce issued by Petitioner's advocate to Respondent's advocate as Ex .W9 and the copy of minutes of inspection carried out by Petitioner's advocate in the Respondent/Bank at Besant Nagar branch as Ex. W10.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that evenfrom the statement produced by him after inspecting some of the documents it is clear that the Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days between May, 1999 and April, 2000 and if we include Saturdays and Sundays in between these periods, it must be concluded that the Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months and as per thejudgement of Supreme Court reported in 1985 II LLN 817 WORKMAN OF AMERICAN EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION VS. AMERICAN EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION and in 1985 II LLN 830 STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS OF INDIA LTD . Vs. A PARTHA SARATHY AND ANOTHER, the Petitioner deemed to have been completed 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months and therefore, the Respondent/Management have not followed the mandatory provisions under section 25F of the I.D. Act and as such , the order of termination passed by the Respondent/Management is ab initio void and the Petitioner is to be reinstated in service as prayed for in the claim statement . In 1985 II LLN 817 the Supreme Court has stated that expression ' actually worked under the employer' in Section 25B (2) (a) (ii ) of I.D. Act must necessarily comprehend all those days during which the workmanwas in the employment of employer and for which he had been paid wages either under express of implied contract of service or by compulsion of statute , standing orders etc. togive any other meanining to that expression would bring the object of Section 25F very close to frustration . It is not possible to limit that expression only to those days which are mentioned in the explanation to Section 25B( 2) for the purpose of calculating the number of days on which the workmen had actually worked though he had not so worked. The explanation is only clarificatory as all explanations are and cannot be used to limit the expanse of mainprovision. In 1985 II LLN 830 the Supreme Court has held that " number of days on which the workmen worked under the employer would be less than 240 days, ifSundays and other holidays for which the workman were paid wages were excluded has already been answered by us in the

11. On the other hand , learned counsel for the Respondent contended that even though the above two judgements have stated that Saturday, Sundays and other holidays are to be added and it should be calculated for 240days, recently, in 2005 II LLJ 128 the Division Bench of High Court of Punjab & Haryana have held that " with regard to daily wagers it is ordinarily understood that they have no pay scale and they have no increment and they are paid for the days they have worked. A daily wager in comparison to a regular employee employed under the service rules , may work on holidays and Sundays as well and shall definitely be paid if he might have worked on such holidays " and applying this ratio the facts of Workmen of American Express International Banking Corporation's case cannot be possibly be applied to the facts ofthis present case . He relied on the rulings reported in that case, wherein the Division Bench of Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that " workmen in the present casewas a daily wager and was not paid for Sundays & other holidays either under the expression or implied contract of service or by compulsion of statute, standing orders etc. and there was no obligation on the part of employer to payto the workman wages for the period that he had not worked be it Sundays or otherwise . Under such circumstances , there could never be any justification for adding Sundays to the tally of206 working days . " Applying this principle in the present case, even assuming for argument sake that the Petitioner has completed 216 days duringthe Period from May, 1999 to April , 2000, we cannot add Sundays and other holidays since there is no obligation on the part of the employer to pay for Sundays and other holidays either under express or implied contract of service or by compulsion of statue or by standing orders . Under such circumstances , the burden of proving the fact that shehas worked for 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months is upon the Petitioner and the Petitioner has not established this fact with any satisfactory evidence . Under such circumstances, the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief. Learned counsel for the Respondent further relied on the rulings reported in 2004 4 LLN 839 MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY BOARD Vs. HARIRAM wherein the Supreme Court has held that " drawing of an adverse inference due to non - production of muster - rollls for the years 1991-02 in the absence of the said pleading , was wholly erroneous on the part of the Industrial Court and the High Court, Moreover, the said Courts erred in basing an order of reinstatement solely on an adverse inference drawn erroneously, especially in view of the fact that the Labour Court had held against the workmen. " 2420

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006/PHALGUNA 27, 1927

Relying on this decision , learned counsel for the Respondent contended that though this Tribunal has ordered to produce muster roll between the years 1998 to 2002, merely because the said documents were not produced before this Tribunal, this Tribunal cannot take any adverse inference due to non - production of muster rolls.

BOARD, KOTA VS. LOKHPAT AND ANOTHER wherein the Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court has held that " services of Respondent/workman was terminated in the year 1983 and he worked in the department for a short period of 19 months and gap from 1983 when his services wereterminatedtill the date of passing of the award namely 3rd January, 1995 was a long one . Even between the date of termination service of the Respondent workman and as of now 20 years have elapsed. If he is to be reinstated he couldonlybereinstated on daily wage basis on the minimum of the wages . The possibility of Respondent workman remaining employed elsewhere during this period of 20 years cannot be ruled out altogether and his reinstatement may result in further complications and administrative difficulties as that post might have been manned by some other person. In a case, where a workman has remained not in touch with the job for such a long period of time, it may not be expedientto order reinstatement while setting aside the order of his termination and in such a case, compensation in lieu ofreinstatement, ought to be ordered. " Relying on this decision, learned counsel for the respondent contended that evern if the Tribunal has come to a conclusion that the Petitioner is to be reinstated in service, in view of the said decision , compensation in lieu of reinstatement could be a proper relief.

15. But, I think in this case , the Petitioner was terminated only in the year 2002 and now we are in 2005 and therefore , it cannot be said that the Petitioner is out of touch with her job. Under such circumstances , I direct the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner into service , with continuity of service , with all attendant benefits. With regard to back wages , I find the Petitioner has not adduced any evidence with regard to her non -employment during that period . As such , I find an order for half of the back wages would be proper relief in the circumstances shown before this Tribunal .

12. But , I find there is no point in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent because only after contest in I.A. petition, this Tribunal had ordered the Respondent to produce the muster roll for the years 1998 to 2002 and if the documents are produced before this Tribunal , definitely it would establilsh the fact whether the Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days or not . But without producing the documents and without showing the documents before the counsel for the Petitioner, it cannot be said that the Petitioner has not established before this Tribunal that she has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months . Though the Respondent's counsel relied on the rulings reported in Punjab & Haryana High Court, I find the Supreme Court has clearly held in the case of Workmen of American Express International Banking Corporation that Sundays and other holidays must be included in the 240 days calculation as mentioned under section 25B (2 ) . Under such circumstances , I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner. The Petitioner has produced documents to show that she has worked for 216 days betweenMay, 1999 and April, 2000 and ifwe calculate Sundays & holidays in between these periods, it has to be concluded that the Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months . Further, even after this Tribunal's order in I.A. petition, the Respondent have neither produced the muster rolls pertaining to 1998 to 2002 before this Tribunal nor they have shown all the documents to the counsel for the Petitioner as ordered . Under such circumstances , I find this Tribunal can take adverse inference to the effect that ifthese documents are produced before this Court , it would definitely prove the contention against the Respondent . Under such circumstances , I find this point in favour of the Petitioner.

16. Therefore, I direct the Respondent/Management to reinstate the Petitioner into service forthwith with continuity of service and all other attendant and consequentialbenefits and with regard to back wages , she isentitled to half of the back wages .

Point No. 2

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

17. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly. (Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected andpronounced by me in the open court on this day the 19th December. 2005. )

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer 13. In view of my foregoing findings that the action ofthe Respondent/Management in terminating the services ofthePetitioner is not legal andjustified, I find the Petitioner is to be reinstated in service .

Witnesses Examined:-

For the I Party/Workman : Smt. T. Parvathy, WWI

For the Respondent

Management : SriR. Prabhakar MWI

Documents Marked:

Forthe I Party/Petitioner:

14.But, again the learned counsel for the Respondent contendedthat the Petitioner was alleged to be terminated during February, 2002 and considering the long period for which the workman remained out of touch with the job , compensation in lieu of reinstatement alone would be a proper relief. For this , he relied on the rulings reported in 2003 (3 ) LLJ 928 RESIDENT ENGINEER, HOUSING

Ex. No.Date Description [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2421

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च18, 2006/फाल्गुन 27, 1927

W1 seriesNil Xerox copy ofthe payment vouchers 15 nos .

W2 16-02-02 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner toRespondent/Bank

W3 16-04-2002 Xerox copy of the legal notice issued byPetitioner To Respondent/ Management

W4 19-04-2002 Xerox copy of the legal notice issuedby Petitioner To II Party/Management W5 24-06-2002 Xerox copy of the 2A petition filedby Petitioner

W6 28-10-2002 Xerox copy of the reply filedby Respondent/Management

W7 21-10-2002 Xerox copy of the letter from II Party/ Management to Assistant Labour Commissioner(Central)

W8 22-04-0- Xeroxcopy ofthe letter from Respondent advocate to Respondent/Management W9 13-09-2004 Xerox copy of the letter from I Party advocate to II Party/Management advocate

W10 23-04-2005 Xerox copy of the minutes of inspection carried out by I Party's advocate at Besant Nagar branch

W11 Nil

Statement showing number of days workedby Petitioner in Respondent/ Bank

W12Nil

Statement showing lumpsum payment ofwages paid to Petitioner by Besant Nagarbranch

For the II Party/Management :-

Ex. No.Date Description

M1 Nil

Xerox copy of the statement showing details of cash Payment made to Petitioner

M2 04-09-99 Xerox copy ofthe order oftransfer issued to Smt. Sumathi

M3 04-03-200 Xeroxcopy ofthe order of transfer issued toSri Selvaraj. श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 4 मार्च, 2006

का. आ. 1069.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा (3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा 16 मार्च, 2006 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और 77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्यके निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

" आंध्र प्रदेश- पश्चिम गोदावरी जिले के अन्तर्गत पालकोल्ल् नगरपालिका एवं राजस्व ग्राम की सीमा में आने वाले सभी क्षेत्र:- लंकला, कोडेरू, भग्गेश्वरम, पूलालपल्ली, उल्लमपर्क, चिंतपर्क दिगमरूं, चिट्टवरम, पेदमामिडिपल्ली, वरिधानम, चंदपरू , गोरिंटाड़ा, दग्गुलूरू, बल्लिपाडु कापवरम, पालकोल्लु मण्डल/ग्राम पंचायत के एस. चिक्काला तथा पोडुरू मंडल के राजस्व गाँव- मट्टपर्स जिन्नेरू , वेदंगी और पेनुमादम तथा यलमंचिली मंडल के अडविपालेम और मेड़‌पाडु राजस्वग्राम ।"

[संख्या एस-38013/27/2006- एस. एस. - 1 ]

के. सी. जैन , निदेशक MINISTRY OF LABOURAND EMPLOYMENT NewDelhi , the 4th March, 2006

S.O. 1069. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 16th March, 2006 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter-V andVI (exept Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and 77,78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Andhra Pradesh namely:-

"All the area falling within the limits of Palakol Municipality and Revenue Villages of Palakol , Lankala Koderu , Bhaggeswaram , Poolalpalli , Ullamparru , Chintaparru, Digamarru, Chittavaram , Pedamanida-Palli, Varidhanam, Chandaparru, Gorintada, Dagguluru, Ballipadu, Kapavaram, S. Chikkala of Palakol Mandal/Gram Panchayat and Reveune Villages ofMattaparru , Jinneru , Vedangi and Penumadam of Poduru Mandal and Revenue Villages of Adavipałem and Medapadu of Yalamanchali Mandal of West Godawari District of Andhra Pradesh. "

[No.S- 38013/27/2006-S.S..I]

K. C. JAIN, Director नई दिल्ली, 4 मार्च, 2006

का. आ. 1070. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 )की धारा -1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 16 मार्च, 2006 को उस तारीख के रुप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 ( धारा-76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77,78,79 . और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

" आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य में चित्तूर जिले के नगरी मण्डल में राजस्व ग्राम थडुकु की सीमा में आने वाले सभी क्षेत्र ।"

[संख्या एस -38013/28/2006- एस. एस. -1 ] के. सी. जैन, निदेशक NewDelhi , the 4th March, 2006

S.O. 1070. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 16th March, 2006 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and 2422

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 18 , 2006 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1927

Chapter-V and VI ( except sub - section 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Andhra Pradesh namely:---

"All the Areas Falling within the Limits of Thaduku Reveune Village in Nagari Mandal of Chittoor District in Andhra Pradesh. "

[No.S- 38013 /28/2006-S.S .. ]

K. C. JAIN, Director नई दिल्ली, 4 मार्च . 2006

का. आ. 1071. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा 16 मार्च, 2006 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 (धारा -76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध हरियाणा राज्यके निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्ः

जिला

राजस्व भाग हदबस्त सं ० क्रंसं०

4

2

3

दैषी नगर

384

1. सैक्टर-3 ,पंचकुला

पंचकुला

379

पंचकुला 2. सैक्टर -4, व 5 , पंचकुला जुडिया

377

भैंसा टिब्बा

पंचकुला

383

पंचकुला

हरिपुर

फिरोजपुर कलॉ 386 पंचकुला

फिरोजपुर खुर्द 387 पंचकुला

379

पंचकुला

जुडिया

3. सैक्टर-6 ,पंचकुला

379

4. सैक्टर -7,पंचकुला जुडिया

पंचकुला

380

ढ़ीला

पंचकुला

381

5. सैक्टर -9 व 10 , पंचकुला दामसू

पंचकुला 6. सैक्टर -11 , पंचकुला रैली-रेला

369 पंचकुला [ संख्या एस -38013/26/2006 - एस. एस.- 1 ]

के. सी. जैन , निदेशक

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 4th March , 2006 S.O. 1071. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 16th March , 2006 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter - V and VI ( except sub - section (1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Haryana namely : --

District Sl . No.

Hadbast No.

Revenue Village

384 Panchkula 1. Sector-3 , Panchkula Devi Nagar

Judian

Panchkula

379

1. Sector -4 and 5,

Panchkula

Bhainsa

377 Panchkula

Tibba

383 Panchkula

Hari Pur

Panchkula

Ferozpur 386

Panchkula

Ferozpur Khurd 387

379 Panchkula 3. Sector -6 , Panchkula Judian

379 Panchkula 4. Sector -7 , Panchkula Judian

380 Panclıkula

Dhilan

Dhansoo 381 Panchkula 5. Sector -9 and 10 ,

Panchkula

369 Panchkula 6. Sector - 11 , Panchkula Raili Raila

[No.S- 38013/26/2006-S.S..I]

K. C. JAIN, Director

Printedby the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .

Cite this issue. Weekly Gazette of India, Government of India, 18 March 2006. Indian Gazettes, https://egazette.servantsofknowledge.in/details/in.gazette.central.w.2006-03-18.18117/. Archive identifier in.gazette.central.w.2006-03-18.18117.