This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं. डी. एल. (एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 4]

No. 4]

नई दिल्ली, जनवरी 20 जनवरी 26 , 2008 , शनिवार पौष 30 - माघ 6 , 1929 NEW DELHI , JANUARY 20-JANUARY 26 , 2008, SATURDAY/PAUSA30-MAGHA 6, 1929 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथ्थक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग 11-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड (ii)

PART IISection 3-Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

गृह मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 18 जनवरी, 2008

का. आ. 145. सार्वजनिक परिसर अनधिकृत अधिभोगी की बेदखली अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40) की धारा 3 के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा श्री एस. सत्यनारायण, सहायक निदेशक , सहायक आसूचना ब्यूरो , भुवनेश्वर, सरकार के एक राजपत्रित अधिकारी को कथित नियम के उद्देश्य के लिए दिनांक 10-08-2007 से सम्पदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है और निदेश देती है कि कथित अधिकारी प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे और कथित अधिनियम के द्वारा अथवा उसके अन्तर्गत सहायक आसूचना ब्यूरो , भुवनेश्वर के नियंत्रण में आने वाले भुवनेश्वर के समस्त सरकारी रिहायशों के संबंध में सम्पदा अधिकारी को अधि रोपित कर्त्तव्यों का निर्वहन करेंगे ।

[सं. 27/सी-11 /2007 ( ईओ ) आई- पीएफ- II - 01 हिन्दी ] निर्मला देव , डेस्क अधिकारी/पीएफ -11 MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NewDelhi , the 18th January, 2008 S. O. 145. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the public premises (eviction of unauthorized 146 GI/2008

(333)

occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ), the Central Govt. hereby appoints Sh . S. Satyanarayana , Assistant Director Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau, Bhubaneshwar , a Gazetted Officer ofthe Government, to be the Estate Officer w.e.f. 10-8-2007 for the purpose of the said Act and directs that the said officer shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties, imposed on the Estate Officer by or under the said Act , in respect of all Government accommodation at Bhubaneshwar under the control of Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau, Bhubaneshwar.

[No. 27/C-II/2007 (EO)-I - PF - II -01 - Hindi] NIRMALA DEV, Desk Officer/PF - II नई दिल्ली, 18 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 146. लोक परिसर ( अनधिकृत दखलकारों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 की 40 ) की धारा 3 के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार, एतद्वारा श्रीमती के. विजयलक्ष्मी , सहायक निदेशक, सहायक आसूचना ब्यूरो , मुंबई , सरकार की एक राजपत्रित अधिकारी को उक्त अधिनियम के उद्देश्य के लिए सम्पदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है तथा यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त अधिकारी प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेगा तथा सहायक आसूचना 334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008 /MAGHA 6, 1929

ब्यूरो , मुंबई के नियंत्रण के अधीन मुंबई के सभी सरकारी आवासों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम के अंतर्गत या द्वारा सम्पदा अधिकारी पर अधिरोमित कर्त्तव्यों का निष्पादन करेगी ।

[सं. 27/सी- II/2007 (ईओ ) -I-पीएफ- II -02 हिन्दी] निर्मला देव , डेस्क अधिकारी/पीएफ-II New Delhi , the 18th January, 2008

$.O. 146. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ) , the Central Govt. hereby appoints Smt . K. Vijayalakshmi , Assistant Director Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau , Mumbai , a Gazetted Officer ofthe Government , to be the Estate Officer for the purpose ofthe said Act and directs that the said officer shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties , imposed on the Estate Officer by or under the said Act , in respect ofall government accommodation at Mumbai under the control ofSubsidiary Intelligence Bureau, Mumbai .

[No. 27/C- II/2007 (EO)-I -PF - II-02 -Hindi ] NIRMALA DEV, Desk Officer/PF - II

विदेश मंत्रालय (सी. पी. वी. प्रभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 147.-राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) व 2 के अंक ( क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा भारत का प्रधान कौंसलावास , फ्रॉक्फर्ट ( जर्मनी ) में श्री अजय कुमार शर्मा , सहायक को 11-1-2008 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी -4330/1/2006 ] प्रीतम लाल , अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर) :

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (C. P. V. Division ) New Delhi , the 1 I th January, 2008

S. O. 147. In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and Fees ) Act , 1948 , the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Ajay Kumar Sharma, Assistant to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the Consulate General of India, Frankfurt Germany with effect from 1 Ith January, 2008.

[No. T-4330/ 1/2006] PRITAM LAL, Under Secy. ( Consular)

वित्त मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 148.- रूग्ण औद्योगिक कंपनी ( विशेष उपबंध ) अधिनियम , 1985 ( 1986 का 1 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा ,

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] श्री बादल कुमार दास , भा.प्रा.से. ( म प्र:72 ) ( सेवा निवृत ) , को उनके पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वर्षों के लिए अथवा उनके 65 वर्ष की आयु प्राप्त करने तक या औद्योगिक एवं वित्तीय पुनर्निर्माण बोर्ड अपील प्राधिकारी ( एएआईएफआर ) के उत्सादन तक या अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , एएआईएफआर के सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 20(2 ) /2002- आईएफ- II ] खड़ग सिंह , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF - FINANCE (Department of Financial Services) New Delhi , the 17th January, 2008

S. O. 148. -In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Sick Industrial Companies ( Special Provisions ) Act, 1985 ( 1 of 1986) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Badal Kumar Das , IAS (MP: 72 ) (Retd) , as Member, Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) for three years, with effect from the date of assumption of the charge ofthe post, or till he attains the age of 65 years or till the abolition ofAAIFR or until further orders , whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. 20(2)/2002 - IF - II ] KHARG SINGH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 18 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 149. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ( अनुषंगी बैंक ) अधि नियम , 1959 ( 1959 का 38 ) की धारा 26 की उपधारा ( 2 क ) के साथ पठित धारा 25 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( गख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एतद्वारा , महासचिव अनुषंगी बैंक अधिकारी परिसंघ , स्टेट बैंक आफ सौराष्ट्र इकाई , श्री उमेश के. गहोई [जो फिलहाल प्रधान कार्यालय , भावनगर में मुख्य प्रबंधक ( परिचालन) के रूप में तैनात हैं ] को अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्षों के लिए अथवा स्टेट बैंक आफ सौराष्ट्र के अधिकारी के रूप में उनकी सेवा समाप्त होने तक अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , स्टेट बैंक ऑफ सौराष्ट्र के बोर्ड में अधिकारी कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 8/6/2002 - बीओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 18th January, 2008

S. O. 149. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (cb) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 25 read with sub- section (2A) of Section 26 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks ) Act , 1959 (38 of 1959 ), the Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby nominates Shri Umesh K. Gahoi , General Secretary , Associate Banks Officers ' Association, Unit State Bank of Saurashtra (presently posted as Chief Manager(Operations) . HO , Bhavnagar) as Officer Employee [भाग II---खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

335

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008 /माघ 6, 1929

Director on the Board of Directors of State Bank of Saurashtra for a period of three years from the date of notification and thereafter until he ceases to be an officer of the State Bank of Saurashtra or until further orders , whichever is the earliest .

[F. No. 8/6/2002-BO- I] G.B. SINGH , Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 150.- भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अधिनियम , 1955 ( 1955 का 23 ) की धारा 19 के खंड ( ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , श्री अरुण रामानाथन , सचिव , वित्त मंत्रालय , वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग , नई दिल्ली को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेशों तक , श्री विनोद राय के स्थान पर भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के केन्द्रीय बोर्ड में , निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/ 7/2007 - बीओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव New Delhi , 18th January, 2008

S. O. 150.- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) ofSection 19 ofthe State Bank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955), the Central Government , hereby nominated Shri Arun Ramanathan, Secretary , Ministry of Finance , Department of Financial Services , New Delhi as a Director on the Central Board of State Bank of India with immediate.. effect and until further orders vice Shri Vinod Rai .

[F. No. 9/7/2007-BO-I ] G.B. SINGH, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 151.- भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ( बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) की दिनांक 11 अप्रैल , 2005 की अधिसूचना सं. फा. सं . 15/1/98- बीओए के क्रम में और बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों. का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारत सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिशों पर , एतद्वारा , घोषणा करती है कि उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 19 की उप - धारा 2 के उपबंध उस सीमा तक, जहां तक उनका संबंध मैसर्स डायनेमेटिक फोर्जिंग इंडिया लि. के चुकता शेयर पूंजी का 30 % से अधिक गिरवीदार के रूप में धारित करने से है , पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक पर तीन वर्षों के लिए अर्थात् 21 जनवरी , 2011 तक लागू नहीं होंगे ।

[फा. सं. 7/ 165/2007 - बीओए ] डी.पी. भारद्वाज , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 18th January , 2008

S.O.151 . In continuation of Government of India, Ministry of Finance , Department of Economic Affairs (Banking Division ) Notification No. F.No. 15 /1 / 98 -BOA dated 11th April , 2005 , and in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Banking Regulation Act , 1949 (10 of 1949) , the Government of India , on the recommendations of Reserve Bank of India , hereby declares that the provisions of Sub - section 2 of Section 19 ofthe said Act shall not apply to Punjab & Sind Bank for a further period ofthree years i.e. upto 21st January , 2011 , in so far as they relate to its holding of the shares of M/sDynamatic Forgings India Ltd. in excess of 30 % ofthe paid up share capital of the company as pledgee .

[F. No. 7/ 165/2007 -BOA]

D. P. BHARDWAJ , Dy. Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 21 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 152.-जीवन बीमा निगम अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 31 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एत‌द्वारा , श्री अरुण रामानाथन , सचिव , वित्त मंत्रालय , वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग , नई दिल्ली को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेशों तक, श्री विनोद राय के स्थान पर उक्त निगम में सदस्य के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 14/3/2003 - बीमा- III ] वी. पी. भारद्वाज , निदेशक New Delhi , the 21st January , 2008

S.O. 152. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act , 1956 (31 of 1956), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Arun Ramanathan , Secretary, Department of Financial Services , Ministry of Finance as member of the said Corporation vice Shri Vinod Rai , with immediate effect till further orders .

[F. No. 14/3/2003 - Ins . III ] V. P. BHARDWAJ , Director (राजस्व विभाग)

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली , 18 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 153 ,- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 (उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ 1-4-2007 से संगठन दि फाउंडेशन फार मेडिकल रिसर्च , मुम्बई को निम्नलिखित शतर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्:-

(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन बही- खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की भारा 288 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा 336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/MAGHA 6 , 1929

परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता - बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आग्र विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की मियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित्त एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

( iv ) संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त कशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्रसरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( III ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( Iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक | अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत महीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ ) अपना अनुसंधान करर्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ङ ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 09/2008/फा. सं. 203/109/2007/आ. क. नि.- II ]

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] (iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums receivedby it for sclentific research , reflect therein the amounts ussd for carrying out rasearch , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to Sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signsd and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act; (iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(a) fails to maintain separats books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii ) ofparagraph 1 ; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 : or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or

सुरेन्द्र पाल, अवर सचिव

(Department ofRevenue)

(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ) NewDelhi , the 18th January, 2008

S.O. 153. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization The Foundation for Medical Research, Mumbai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 ( said Act ), read with Rules 5C and SE of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 (saidRules) , with effect from 1-4-2007 in the category of other Institution ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe said Act read with rules 5C and 5E ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 09/2008 /F . No. 203/109/2007/ITA - II ] SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 154. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ 1-4-2004 से संगठन बम्बई नेचुरल हिस्ट्री सोसायटी , मुम्बई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्: - (i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

[ भाग II -खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन बही-खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

( iv ) संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दाम तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा ( ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप -पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 08/2008/फा.: सं. 203/49/2005/आ. क. नि. II ]

337

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/ माघ 6, 1929

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shail maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to Sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and fumish the report of such audit duiy signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income -tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the retum of income under Sub-section ( i ) of Section 139 ofthe said Act; (iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shail accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Centrai Government shail withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(a) faiis to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or

(b) faiis to fum ish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) ofparagraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or

सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 18th January , 2008 S.O. 154. It is hereby notified for generai information that the organization Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income-tax Act , 1961 (said Act ) , read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income -tax Rules, 1962(said Rules ), with effect from 1-4-2004 in the category of ' other Institution ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:

(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause (ii ) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe said Act read with rules 5C and SE ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 08/2008/F . No. 203/49/2005/ITA- II ] SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 155.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ 1-4-2006 से संगठन नेचर कंजरवेशन फाउंडेशन , मैसूर को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के 338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008 /MAGHA 6, 1929

अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी 'अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्:

( i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

( ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

1 (iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन बही - खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- बारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगाः ।

( iv ) संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 ङ के साथ पड़ित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 10/2008/फा. सं. 203/6/2007/आ. क. नि. II ] सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th January, 2008

S.O. 155. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Nature Conservation Foundation , Mysore has been approved by the Central

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

= Government for the purpose of clause ( ii) of Sub - section ( 1) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act) , read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income -tax Rules , 1962 ( said Rules) , with effect from 1-4-2006 in the category of 'other Institution ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

( ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to Sub- section (2 ) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountantto the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act; (iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate. statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:--

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referredto in sub -paragraph (iv) of paragraph 1; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii) of Sub -section ( 1) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5E of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 10/2008/F . No. 203/6/2007 /ITA - 11 ]

SURENDER PAL, Under Secу .

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 156 ,-केन्द्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 4 ) के खण्ड (ख्त्र ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करके उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग- III में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्:-

2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग- III में क्रम सं. 89 के बाद स्तंभ 1 , 2 तथा 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी:-

भारतीय विश्वविद्यालयों

90. यूनिवर्सिटी

द्वारा प्रदत्त पी जी

एडिलेड , डिप्लोमा के समकक्ष

फोरेन्सिक अडोन्टोलाजी मेंग्रेजुएट डिप्लोमा , यूनिवर्सिटी आफ एडिलेड, आस्ट्रेलिया आफ आस्ट्रेलिया अतिरिक्त अर्हता के रूप में फोरेन्सिक अडोन्टोलाजी में ग्रेजुएटडिप्लोमा (यदि 14-12-2001 कोअथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

[फा. सं. वी -12018/8/ 2007 -डी ई ]

के. वी. एस. राव , उप सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 14th December ,2007 S.O. 156.- In exercise of the powers conferredby clause (b) Sub - section (4 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948) and the Central Government , after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hareby makes the following further amendments in Part -III of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

2. Under the existing entries of column 1 , 2 and 3 after serial number 89 in Part - III of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) the followig entries shall be added, namely :-

Graduate Diploma Graduate Diploma

90. University of

inforensic

Adelaide ,

Australia

Odontology as an Odontology additional qualification

in forensic University of

Adelaide, equivalent to PG

Australia Diploma awarded by

Indian universities.

(when granted on

or after 14-12-2001 )

[No. V- 12018/8 /2007 -DE]

K.V.S. RAO , Dy. Secy.

339

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

नई दिल्ली , 21 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 157.- कोलंबो विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदत्त डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसीन की चिकित्सीय अर्हता भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अंतर्गत मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;

और उक्त अर्हता धारण करने वाले श्री लंकाई राष्ट्रिक डॉ. नलका अभयगुनशेखर पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजनार्थ और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए कोलंबो विश्वविद्यालय से संलग्न हैं;

अतः , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केंन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डॉ. नलका अभयगुनशेखर के चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-

( क ) 11-02-2008 से 12-02-2009 तक एक वर्ष की अवधि तक;

(ख ) बशर्ते कि डा. नलका अभयगुनशेखर भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद द्वारा 01-12-2008 से 11-02-2009 की अवधि के लिए अपना नवीकृत अस्थायी पंजीकरण प्रमाणपत्र प्राप्त करेंगे; अथवा

(ग) ऐसी अवधि तक जिसके दौरान डा... नलका अभयगुनशेखर कोलंबो विश्वविद्यालय से संलग्न हैं, जो भी लघुतर हो, परिसीमित होगी ।

[सं. वी- 11025/07/07 - एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ] के. वी. एस. राव , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 21st January, 2008

S.O. 157.- Whereas Medical qualification Doctor of Medicine granted by University of Colombo is a recognized medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act ;

Andwhereas Dr. Nalaka Abeygunsekera , Sri Lankan National , who possess the said qualification is attached to University of Colombo for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of sub- section (1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period ofpractice of medicine by Dr. Nalaka Abeygunsekera in India shall be limited to:-

(a) a period ofone year from 11-02-2008 to 12-2-2009;

(b) subject to the condition that Dr. Nalaka Abeygunsekera shall get his certificate of temporary registration renewed by MCI for the period 01-12-2008 to 11-02-2009; or

[No. V- 11025/07/07-ME (Policy-1) ]

K. V. S. RAO , Dy. Secy.

340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008 /MAGHA 6 , 1929

रेल मंत्रालय (रेलवे बोर्ड)

नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 158. रेल मंत्रालय ( रेलवे बोर्ड ) , राजभाषा नियम, 1976 ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) के नियम 10 के उप-नियम ( 2 ) और ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में राष्ट्रीय रेल संग्रहालय , नई दिल्ली , को जहां 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक अधिकारियों/ कर्मचारियों से हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है ।

[सं. हिन्दी-2008/रा.भा. 1/12/1 ] कृष्णा शर्मा, संयुक्त निदेशक, ( राजभाषा ) रेलवे बोर्ड MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

(RailwayBoard) New Delhi , the 11th January , 2008

S.O. 158. Ministry ofRailways (RailwayBoard) , in pursuance of Sub Rule (2 ) and (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes ofthe union) Rules, 1976, hereby , notify National Rail Museum , New Delhi , where 80 % or more Officers /Employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi .

[No. Hindi - 2008/ O.L.1 / 12/ 1 ] KRISHNA SHARMA, Jt . Director, ( O.L) Railway Board रसायन एवं उर्वरक मंत्रालय (उर्वरक विभाग)

नई दिल्ली , 17 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 159.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में रसायन और उर्वरक मंत्रालय , उवर्रक विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन उपक्रम नेशनल फर्टिलाइजर्स लिमिटेड ( एमएफएल ) के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों , जिनके शत - प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों में हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है:

1. नेशनल फर्टिलाइजर्स लिमिटेड , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , गया 2. नेशनल फर्टिलाइजर्स लिमिटेड , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , मुजफ्फरपुर 3. नेशनल फर्टिलाइजर्स लिमिटेड , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , रांची 4. नेशनल फर्टिलाइजर्स लिमिटेड , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , भागलपुर

[सं. ई. 11011 /01/2006-हिन्दी ] विजय छिब्बर , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS (Department of Fertilizers)

New Delhi , the 17th January, 2008

S.O. 159.- In pursuance of sub - Rule ( 4) of the Rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for offcial purposes

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] oftheUnion) Rule, 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices ofNational Fertilizers Limited a PSU under the administrative control of the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers , Department of Fertilizers whereof 100% staff have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi .

1. National Fertilizers Limited , Area Office, Gaya 2. National Fertilizers Limited , Area Office , Muzafferpur

3. National Fertilizers Limited , Area Office , Ranchi

4. National Fertilizers Limited , Area Office , Bhagalpur.

[No. E. 11011/ 1/2006-Hindi ] VIJAY CHHIBBER, Jt . Secy.

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 10 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 160. - समय- समय पर यथा संशोधित , कोयला खान (संरक्षण एवं विकास ) नियम , 1975 के नियम 10 के उप नियमों ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शाक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार, कोयला संरक्षण विकास सलाहकार समिति का एतद्वारा पुनर्गठन करती है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित सदस्य हैं:-

-अध्यक्ष 1. अपर सचिव ( कोयला )

2. संयुक्त सचिव एवं वित्त सलाहकार, कोयेला मंत्रालय -सदस्य 3. सलाहकार ( परियोजना ) , कोयला मंत्रालय -सदस्य 4. अध्यक्ष-सह-प्रबंध निदेशक, सेन्ट्रल -सदस्य माइन प्लानिंग एंड डिजाइन इंस्टीट्यूट लि. , रांची

5. अध्यक्ष-सह- प्रबंध निदेशक, -सदस्य बी.सी.सी.एल.

6. निदेशक ( तकनीकी ) , सी. आई.एल. -सदस्य 7. निदेशक ( तकनीकी ) , एस.सी. सी.एल. -सदस्य 8. खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशालय , श्रम मंत्रालय का प्रतिनिधि -सदस्य 9. केन्द्रीय खंनन एवं ईंधन अनुसंधान -सदस्य संस्थान , धनबाद का प्रतिनिधि

10. योजना आयोग , नई दिल्ली का प्रतिनिधि -सदस्य

-सदस्य सचिव 11. कोयला नियंत्रक , कोलकाता

[सं. 15013/1 /2005- सी.आर.सी. ]

आर. सी. मनोचा , अवर सचिव 341 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 10th January, 2008

S.O. 160. In exercise of the powers confered by sub - rules ( 1 ) and (2) of Rule 10 of the Coal Mines (Conservation and Development ) Rules , 1975, as amended from time to time, the Central Government hereby re- constitutes the Coal Conservation and Development Advisory Committee with the following members :-

इस कथित भूमि में रुचि रखने वाले व्यक्ति भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन डालने के लिए भारत सरकार के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियों की तिथि के इक्कीस दिनों के अंदर , आम जनता के सामने इसमें निहित प्रयोक्ता के अधिकारों के अधिग्रहण के प्रति लिखित आपत्ति , सक्षम प्राधिकारी, ऑयल एण्ड नेचुरल गैस कॉर्पोरेशन लि. , राजामुंदरी परिसम्पत्ति/के. जी. बेसिन , गोदावरी भवन , बेस कॉम्पलेक्स , राजामुंदरी , आन्ध्र प्रदेश को उपलब्ध कराएं ।

Chairman

(1) Additional Secretary

अनुसूची

Member

(ii) JS & FA, Ministry ofCoal

आर. ओ. यु. पाइप लाईन मंडापेटा # 5 से मंडापेटा

(डब्ल्यू) ई.पी.एस

Member

(iii) Advisor (Projects) , Ministry ofCoal

मंडल गांव

कोसापेटा पलीवेला

राज्य जिले

आन्ध्र प्रदेश पूर्वगोदावरी

हेक्टेयर्स

आर.एस. नं.

एस. सेन्टेयर्स एकड़ सेन्टस (iv) Chairman -cum -Managing Director, Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Ltd. , Ranchi

Member

(v) CMD, BCCL

Member

691/7पी

01 (vi) Director (T) , CIL

Member

(vii ) Director (T), SCCL

691/8पी

691/6पी

062

0 09

Member

691/19ए

(viii ) A representative from Directorate General ofMines Safety, Ministry of Labour

691/19थी

691/19सी

Member

(ix) A representative from Central Institute ofMining and Fuel Research, Dhanbad-

691/10बी

ΟΙ

691/17बी

(x) A representative from Planning Commission , NewDelhi

Member

692/21बी

(xi) Coal Controller, Kolkata

692/19थी

Member Secretary

692/9बी

[No. 15013/ 1/2005-CRC]

692/5बी

01½ R.C. MANOCHA, Under Secy.

692/8बी

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

684/9बी

नई दिल्ली , 17 जनवरी , 2008

6841/10बी

684/11बी

684/12बी

684/14

684/3बी

का. आ. 161 ,-जबकि भारत सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है. किजनहित में यह अनिवार्य है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में " मंडापेटा # 5 से भंडापेटा ( डब्ल्यू) ईपीएस " तक पेट्रोलियम के परिवहन के लिए ऑयल एण्ड नेचुरल गैस कॉरपोरेशन लि. द्वारा एक पाइप लाइन डाली जानी चाहिए;

684/3ए

684/13

01 और जबकि भारत सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि कथित पाइप लाइन डालने के प्रयोजन हेतु यहां संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में प्रयोक्ता के अधिकार अर्जित करना अनिवार्य है;

684/2बी

684/2सी

684/2डी

684/2ई 1

684/2 ई 2

अब इसलिए पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में प्रयोक्ता के अधिकारों का अधिग्रहण ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का उपयोग करते हुए भारत सरकार एतद्वारा इसमें निहित प्रयोक्ता के अधिकार अर्जित करने के आशय की घोषणा करती है ,

146 G1 /2008-2 342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008 /MAGHA 6, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] 1

5 0

684/2एफ

0 01½

367/ए

683/5बी

0 01½

364/एफ

683/5सी

0 01½

364/ई

12 683/5डी

364/डी

11 683/5ई

0 01

364/सी

09 683/5एफ

01½

364/बी

08 583/4बी

0 022

364/ए

18 0

682/2

354/7डी

09 678/2

0 05

676/3बी

354/7सी

0 0

09 677/2

0 01½ 354/7बी

0 675/2

012

354/7ए

669/1बी

355/5पी

39 669/2बी

356/3पी

23 670/2

0 18

356/4पी

671/2बी

0 11

356/2पी

15 0

671/3बी

356/1पी2

663/6बी

663/6सी

356/1पी।

06 0

661/2

350/पी

05 660/पी

347/6पी

14 660/पी

347/5पी 2

05 658/2

347/5पी 1

05 685/पी

0 692

347/4पी

13 682/पी

347/3पी

26 679/पी

347/ 1 पी

07 674/पी

0 01%

342/6पी

10 672/पी

0 772

342/5पी

08 1

कुल

342/4पी

08 राज्य

मंडल कोत्तापेटा

जिले

342/3पी

02 गांव

कोत्तापेटा

आन्ध्र प्रदेश पूर्वगोदावरी

आर.एस. नं. हेक्टेयर्स

342/7पी

0 एस. सेन्टेयर्स एकड़ सेन्टस

157/पी

374/1पी

156/2पी

0 374/2पी

156/1पी

45 374/3पी

0 03

151/ए

374/4पी

151/बी

375/पी

0 03

09 0

370/पी

151/सी

0 367/डी

151/डी

02 367/सी

150/2पी

02 367/बी

12 343 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929

6 2

84/5पी

150/1पी

149/25पी

09 84/6पी

149/24पी

84/7पी

149/23पी

0 06

84/8पी

149/21पी

149/22पी

84/1पी

149/4'नी 2

86/2पी

149/4'पी 1

86/3पी

149/3भी

85/7पी

0 03

09 149/2'नी

0 02

148/11पी

85/3पी

148/6पी

0 03

85/2पी

09 148/5पी

85/4पी

07 01

148/4पी

148/3पी

98/4पी

03 148/2 पी

99/पी

05 0

148/1पी

कुल

146/3 पी 2

0 02

146/3पी 1

146/2पी 2

[फा. सं. 12016/62/2007- ओ.एन.जी.- III ] आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव 0

146/2पी 1

145/6पी

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

145/5पी 3

145/5पी 2

0 03

New Delhi , the 17th January, 2008 145/5पी 1

145/4पी

144/पी

654/पी

कुल

S.O. 161. Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation of petroleum from " Mandapeta # 5 to Mandapeta ( w) EPS" in the State of Andhra Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

राज्य जिले

मंडल गांव

रावुलापालेम देवारापाल्ली

आन्ध्र प्रदेश पूर्व गोदावरी

And, whereas , it appears to the Government of India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land described in the Schedule annexed hereto :-

हेक्टेयर्स

आर.एस. नं.

एस. सेन्टेयर्स एकड़ सेन्टस

81/1 पी

81/2'पी

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein:

80/4पी

82/पी

84/13 पी 2

84/14पी

84/12पी

84/13पी 1

Any person interested in the said land may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification, as públished in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein , for laying the pipe- line under the land to the Competent Authority, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/ K.G. Basin, Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008 /MAGHA 6, 1929

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)] SCHEDULE

5 ROU Pipe Line from Mandapeta # 5 to MandapetaGCS

675/2

0 012

669/1b

0 08 Andhra Pradesh

Kothapeta

669/2b

07 State District

EastGodavari

Palivela

Mandal Village

670/2

18 R. S. No Hectares Ares

Cents

Acres

671/2b

11 Centi Ares

671/3b

663/6b

04 1

663/6c

08 0

691/7p

661/2

19 0

14 691/8p

660/p

20 0

660/p

0 062

691/6p

658/2

20 691 / 19a

0 692

685/p

691/19b

0 .

682/p

691/19c

679/p

01½

674/p

691/10b

672/p

772 691/ 17b

TOTAL

44 692/21b

State

Andhra Pradesh

692/196.

District

EastGodavari

Mandal Village

Kothapeta Kothapeta 692/96

R. S. No

Ares

Hectares

Cents

Acres 692/5b

01%

Centi Ares

692/86

5 0

684/9b

374/1p

15 0

684/10b

374/2p

684/1lb

374/3p

684/12b

374/4p

31 684/14

375/p

0 02

0 01

370/p

684/3b

367/D

684/3a

367/C

04 0

684/13

367/B

0 05

12 00

684/2b

367/A

07 0

684/2c

364/F

05 0

684/2d

364/E

12 684/2e1

364/D

364/C

684/2e2

0 03

364/B

08 0

684/2f

012

364/A

18 5

683/5b

0 012

354/7D

09 683/5c

0 012

354/7C

09 0

683/5d

354/7B

14 5

683/5e

354/7A

09 0

683/5f

0 01%

355/5p

683/4b

0 022

356/3p

682/2

0 02

356/4p

678/2

356/2p

676/3b

356/1p2

13 677/2

01½ 356/1pl 345

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008 /माष 6 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0 05 145/5p2

350/p

145/5pI

347/6p

0 06

145/4p

0 347/5p2

144/p

0 05

347/5p1

654/p

347/4p .

TOTAL

347/3p

State

347/1p

Ravulapalem Devarapalli

Andhra Pradesh EastGodavari

Mandal Village

District

342/6p

Cents

Acres

Ares

Hectares

R. S. No

Centi Ares

342/5p

5 0 03

342/4p

342/3p

81/1p

81/2p

342/7p

80/4p

157/p

82/p

156/2p

84/13p2

156/1p

84/14p

04 151 /a

84/12p /

06 03

0 151/b

84/13p1

0 5

0 03

151/c

84/5p

84/6p

151/d

0 02

84/7p

150/2p

0 00

84/8p

12 150/1p

84/1p

149/25p

86/2p

01 0

0 0

0 00

149/ 24p

86/3p

85/7p

149/23p

0 03

85/3p

149/21p

0 03

85/2p

149/221

0 03

85/4p

149/4p2

98/4p

149/4pI

99/p

149/3p

TOTAL

0 02

149/2p

148/11p

[No. 12016/62/2007-ONG- III] R. S. SIKDAR, Under Secy .

148/6p

नई दिल्ली , 21 जनवरी, 2008

148/5p

148/4p

148/3p

148/2p

148/1p

146/3p2

146/3p1

146/2p2

146/2pI

145/6p

का.आ. 162.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिमेंउपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. 621 तारीख क्रमशः 27-02-2007 जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख क्रमशः 03-03-2007 मेंप्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी; 145/5p3 346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008 /MAGHA 6 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 15-05-2007 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

And whereas the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

अतः अंब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाताः है ।

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right ofuser in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances , subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter No. R-31015/7 / 03-OR- II dated 25-11-04.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil: Pisangan

District : Ajmer State: Rajasthan और , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पत्र सं. आर -31015/7/03- ओ.आर. 11 दिनांक 25-11-2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शतों के अध्यधीन सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

Area अनुसूची

Sl . Name of the

Khasara Hectare Are Sq. Mtr .

राज्य : राजस्थान

तहसील : पीसांगन जिला अजमेर

No.

No. Village

क्षेत्रफल

3063

1 Jethana

[F.No. R- 31015/57/2004 -OR- II ] क्र. सं. गाँव का नाम खसरा सं. हेक्टेयर एयर वर्गमीटर

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.

3063

जेठाना

नई दिल्ली , 21 जनवरी , 2008

[फा. सं. आर-31015/57/2004-ओ.आर.- II ]

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st January, 2008

का.आ. 163. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 572 तारीख क्रमशः 22-02-2007 जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख क्रमशः 24-02-2007 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 15-05-2007 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।

S.O. 162. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry ofPetroleum & Natural Gas , S.O. No. 621 dated 27-2-2007 in the Schedule below issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3, Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated 03-03-2007 respectively the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline through Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the state of Gujarat to Delhi by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited .

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 15-05-2007;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है । [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है । :

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के. प्रकाशन की तारीखा से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पत्र सं. आर -31015/7/03- ओ.आर.- II दिनांक 25-11-2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शर्तों के अध्यधीन सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

तहसील : आमेर

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सं. हेक्टेयर

क्र. सं. गाँव का नाम

एयर वर्गमीटर 1.

355

02 40 खोराबीसल

3151

मानपुरामाचेडी

10 3.

08 देव का हरमाडां 21

347

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

And whereas the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification ishereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead ofvesting in the Central Government , vest on the date ofpublication of the declaration , in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances , subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter No. R-31015/7/03 -OR- II dated 25-11-04.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Amer District: Jaipur State: Rajasthan

Area Name of the Khasara Hectare Are Sq. Mtr.

No.

Sl . No. Village

355

0 02 40 1. Khorabisal

3151

05 92 2. Manpura-

machedi

0 08 10 3. Dev Ka Harmada

[फा. सं. आर-31015/70/2004- ओ.आर.- II ]

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 21st January, 2008

S.O. 163.-Whereas by notification of the Govern- ment of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , S.O. No. 572 dated 22-02-2007 in the Schedule below issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 , Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India dated 24-02-2007 respectively the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline through Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the state of Gujarat to Delhi by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited .

Andwhereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 15-05-2007 ;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government ;

[F. No. R- 31015/70/2004-OR- II] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 22 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 164, केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में बीना संस्थापन से राजस्थान राज्य में कोटा तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की 348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008 /MAGHA 6, 1929

1 प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्रीमति भगवंती जेठवानी , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , बीना- कोटा पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, बी-105 , इन्द्रा विहार , तलवण्डी, कोटा-324005 (राजस्थान ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : बारां

तहसील : अन्ता

राज्य : राजस्थान

2. क्र. ग्राम का नाम

सर्वे

क्षेत्रफल सं.

नंबर

हैक्टेयर में

3. 2

400

0.1170 1. जयनगर

0.2100

401

402/572 0.0300

402

0.0468

403

0.0958

404

0.1728

0.1872

405

410

0.3510

411

0.0020

412

0.0216

413

0.0720

414

0.1080

419

0.4320

421/613

0.6200

421

0.3230

421/609

0.0054

0.2520

431

430

0.1180

433

0.3240

514

0.0144

5151

0.1440

515/639

0.1440

515/633

0.1530

509

0.1656

508

0.0720

507

0.1224

506

0.0720

692

0.3950

492

678/492

0.3950

491

0.3312

489

0.4156

483

0.3330

0.0252

542/551

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

जयनगर-जारी

399/570

0.0288

400/580

0.0225

406

0.0536

409

0.0720

408

0.0072

418

0.0150

0.0020

404/585

404/589

0.0020 भोराजेडी

190

0.0090

189

0.0045

2907

बड़वा

0.0396

0.1620

2908

2914

0.2016

2915

0.0540

0.0576

2901

2900

0.0936

2899

0.0020

0.1080

2897

2896

0.0396

2895

0.0020

0.0450

2891

2892

0.0020

2890

0.0200

2889

0.0200

2888

0.0200

2887

0.0216

2886

0.0035

2879

0,0020

2880

0.0144

0.1800

2881

2598

0.0540

0.0630

2597

2603

0.2268

2604

0.1880

2860

0.0216

2859

0.0350

2857

0.0036

2858

0.0324

2845

0.0756

0.0630

2844

2847

0.1870

2841

0.1620

2839

0.0936

2831

0.1008

0.0576

2830

2824

0.0720 349

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ6, 1929

[ भाग II--खण्ड 3( ii)]

3418

0.0100 2825

बड़वा- (आरी )

0.1100

बड़वा- (जारी )

3417

0.0548

0.0180

2809

0.0630

2798

3420

0.0324

0.1680

0.1240 2799

3421

0.1570

2801

0.0324

3423

0.0630

2781

3424

0.0144 2782

0.0432

3425

0.1170

0.0036

3411

2791

0.2430

0.1036

3429

2783

0.0720

0.0242

3410

2786

0.1350

3405

0.0020

0.0810

2769

3409

0.1100

0.0450

2768

3431

0.0900 2767

0.0450

3432

0.1300 2765

0.3440

3434

0.0020

0.0144

2764

0.0800

3435

2763

0.4900

3449

0.0750 2762

0.0288

3450

0.7740

0.3852

2099

3451

0.0200

0.0020

2088

0.0100

3452

0.0936

2087

0.0504

3453

2086

0.0360

0.0108

2085

0.0216

लिसाड़ी

0.0396

2081

0.3996

0.0180

2079

0.2016 2075

0.1620

0.0450 2074

0.0180

105

0.0540 2073

0.2160

104

0.1098 2069

0.0020

106

0.1836 2066

0.0216

0.0396

103

2067

0.1080

0.1620

132

2064

0.0252

0.0900

131

2065

0.0720

0.1650

130

1728

0.2340

129

0.1080

0.0020

1728/3520

136

0.0020

0.1800

178/3522

127

0.5040

0.0030

3196

0.1224

143

1727

0.0720

0.1224

144

3207

0.0936

146

0.1116 3208

0.0818

147

0.0040 3206

0.0990

0.1800

151

3209

0.0252

152

0.1656

0.0360

3210

150

0.0180

0.0540

3211

154

0.0150 3212

0.0540

149/873

0.1710 3398

0.2538

0.0774

206/899

3399

0.0360

208

0.0684 146 GI/2008-3

350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/ MAGHA 6, 1929

1 4.

207

0.2034 लिसाड़ी-( जारी )

205

0.1656

204

0.0020

190

0.0020

202

0.1530

193

0.0216

194

0.0864

195

0.0040

196

0.1008

197

0.0900

0.0090

276

277

0.0450

282

0.2480

283

0.1350

285

0.1080

286

0.0630

286/890

0.0720

340

0.0900

343

0.0090 5.

134

0.0020 गुलाबपुरा

0.1620

135

136

0.4212

140

0.0756

141

0.3600

92/268

0.0360

0.0720

0.2880

0.3096

155

0.0936

166

0.2052

0.0864

167

206

0.0020

205

0.1440

203

0.0180

202

0.0010

201

0.2016

200

0.0360

199

0.1008

0.2196

198

197

0.1440

210

0.0228

216

0.1530

217

0.0612

218

0.1548

219

0.1170

219/252

0.0864

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2

0.1806 गोपालपुरा

0.0152

0.0216

0.2210

0.0150

0.1778

112

0.0534

116

0.1000

118

0.2426

119

0.2354

120

0.0144

123

0.0144

127

0.2858

0.1534

128

129

0.0400

129/303

0.0020

0.0288

131

138

0.1606

139

0.0770

141

0.0482

0.0720

280

281

0.1250

283

0.0252

0.0540

289

290

0.1600 अमलसरा

0.3096

0.0612

0.0648

0.0504

0.0414

0.0108 बमूलियामाताजी

0.0738

0.0576

0.0040

0.0324

0.2160

0.1080

0.1170

0.0540

0.0936

0.2610

0.0252

0.2556

0.0576

0.0738

103

104

0.0504 351

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1 1

0.0738 8.

105

बमूलियामाताजी(जारी )

106

0.0720

0.1296

108

0.0144

109/898

0.0756

109

0.0360

118

0.0018

144

0.0180

144/1003

0.0720

147

0.1080

148

0.1080

146

0.0018

145

0.0288

145/876

137

0.0054

0.0648

138

0.0504

136

0.0720

181

182

0.0144

0.1728

235

0.1260

232

0.0018

233

0.0360

231

0.0288

241

10.

0.0720

258

0.0054

259

0.2808

257

0.0018

255

0.0540

391

0.1260

388

0.0396

362

0.0720

359

0.0360

358

0.1080

343

0.0018

344

0.0630

342

329

0.0090

330

0.0540

331

0.2160

332

0.0630

0.1584

333

0.0360

334

0.1620

336

0.1440

335

0.1260

337

4 2

0.0090

147

आमा

0.1890

148

0.0360

154

155

0.0810

0.0216

153

0.0020

156

169

0.3140

168

0.0020

171

0.0300

0.1800

172

0.2052

165

0.0360

184

192/269

0.3100

192

0.3230

0.1728

191

210

0.1368

211

0.0144

226

0.2250

0.1512

243

244

0.0090

0.1260

246

245

0.0020

0.0676

250

0.2700

194

दुगारी

195

0.0252

202

0.0684

203

0.1080

206

0.0020

207

0.0288

208

0.0450

0.0810

209

213

0.0252

0.0576

214

231

0.3888

275

0.1620

276

0.1170

277

0.1260

279

0.0504

282

0.1800

283

0.0020

286

0.0720

287

0.0360

288

0.0540

292

0.0040

0.0684

293

320

0.2232 352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/ MAGHA 6, 1929

1. 10.

0.1080

321/1135

दुगारी-(जारी )

324

0.1800

323

0.0936

477

0.0540

478

0.0324

479

0.0324 [फा. सं. आर-31015/1 /2008- ओ.आर.- II ]

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 22nd January, 2008

S.O. 164. Whereas it appears to the Central Gov- erriment that it is necessary in public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Bina Terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, Pipeline to Kota in the State ofRajasthan should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Cor- poration Limited;

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is neces- sary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred bySub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Min- erals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight of User in Land) Act , 1962, (50 of 1962) the Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date ofwhich the copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to publc , object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Bhagwanti Jethwani , Competent Authority, Bina- Kota Pipeline Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, B- 105 Indra Vihar Talwandi, Kota-324005 (Rajasthan).

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Anta Distt. Baran State: Rajasthan NameofVillage

2. Sl. No.

Survey No.

Area (inHect ares)

3. 1

400

0.1170 1. JaiNagar

401

0.2100

402/572

0.0300

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

0.0468 JaiNagar(Contd.) 402

403

0.0958

0.1728

404

405

0.1872

410

0.3510

411

0.0020

412

0.0216

413

0.0720

0.1080

414

419

0.4320

421/613

0.6200

421

0.3230

421/609

0.0054

431

0.2520

430

0.1180

433

0.3240

514

0.0144

515

0.1440

515/639

0.1440

515/633

0.1530

509

0.1656

508

0.0720

507

0.1224

506

0.0720

0.3950

692

492

0.3950

678/492

491

0.3312

489

0.4156

483

0.3330

542/551

0.0252

399/570

0.0288

400/580

0.0225

406

0.0536

409

0.0720

408

0.0072

418

0.0150

404/585

0.0020

404/589

0.0020

190

0.0090 Bhorajedi

189

0.0045 Badhva

2907

0.0396

2908

0.1620

2914

0.2016

2915

0.0540

2901

0.0576

2900

0.0936 353

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0.0020

0.0288

2762

2899

Badhva(Contd. )

Badhva (Contd. )

0.3852

0.1080

2099

2897

0.0396

0.0020 2896

2088

0.0020

2895

2087

0.0936

0.0450

2891

2086

0.0360

0.0020

2892

0.0108

2085

0.0200

2890

0.0396

2081

2889

0.0200

2079

0:0180 2888

0.0200

0.1620

2075

0.0216

2887

0.0180

2074

0.2160

0.0035

2073

2886

0.0020

2069

0.0020

2879

2066

2880

0.0144

0.0216

0.1800

2881

0.1080

2067

0.0540

2598

0.0252

2064

2597

0.0630

2065

0.0720

0.2268

2603

0.2340

1728

0.1880

2604

0.0020

1728/3520 2860

0.0216

1728/3522 0.1800

0.0350

2859

0.0030

3196

2857

0.0036

0.0720

1727

0.0324

0.0936 2858

3207

0.0756

0.0818 2845

3208

0.0630

0.0990 2844

3206

0.0252

0.1870

2847

3209

0.0360 2841

0.1620

3210

0.0540

0.0936

3211

2839

2831

0.1008

0.0540

3212

0.0576

0.2538 2830

3398

2824

0.0720

0.0360

3399

0.0100 2825

0.1100

3418

0.0548 2809

0.0180

3417

0.0324

0.0630

2798

3420

0.1680

0.1240 2799

3421

0.0324 2801

0.1570

3423

0.0144

0.0630

2781

3424

0.1170

0.0432

2782

3425

0.0036

0.2430

2791

3411

0.1036

0.0720

2783

3429

0.0242

0.1350

2786

3410

0.0020

0.0810

2769

3405

2768

0.0450

0.1100

3409

0.0900

0.0450

2767

3431

0.1300 2765

0.3440

3432

2764

0.0144

0.0020

3434

0.0800

3435

2763

0.4900 354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/MAGHA 6, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

286/890

0.0720 3.

3449

0.0750

Lisadhi (Contd.)

Badhva ( Contd .)

340

0.0900

0.7740

3450

343

0.0090 3451

0.0200

3452

0.0100

134

0.0020

Gulabpura

135

0,1620

0.0504

3453

136

0.4212 4.

Lisadhi

0.0216

140

0.0756 18

0.3996

0.3600

141

0.2016

92/268

0.0360 67

0.0450

0.0720 105

0.0540

0.2880 104

0.1098

0.3096 106

0.1836

155

0.0936 103

0.0396

0.2052

166

132

0.1620

167

0.0864 131

0.0900

206

0.0020 130

0.1650

205

0.1440 129

0.1080

203

0.0180 136

0.0020

202

0.0010 127

0.5040

201

0.2016 143

0.1224

200

0.0360 144

0.1224

199

0.1008 146

0.1116

0.2196

198

0.0040

147

0.1440

197

151

0.1800

210

0.0228 152

0.1656

0.1530

216

150

0.0180

217

0.0612 154

0.0150

218

0.1548

0.1710

149/873

0.1170

219

0.0774

206/899

219/252

0.0864 208

0.0684

0.1806 207

0.2034

Gopalpura

0.0152

0.1656

205

204

0.0216

0.0020

0.2210

0.0020

190

0.0150 202

0.1530

0.1778

0.0216

193

112

0.0534 194

0.0864

116

0.1000 195

0.0040

118

0.2426 196

0.1008

119

0.2354 197

0.0900

0.0144

120

276

0.0090

123

0.0144 277

0,0450

127

0.2858 282

0.2480

128

0,1534 283

0.1350

129

0.0400 285

0.1080

0.0020

129/303

286

0.0630 355

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4 1

0.0288 6.

Gopalpura(Contd .) 131

0.1606

138

0.0770

139

0.0482

141

0.0720

280

0.1250

281

0.0252

283

289

0.0540

290

0.1600

0.3096

Amalsara

0.0612

0.0648

0.0504

0.0414

0.0108 8.

BamuliyaMataji

0.0738

0.0576

0.0040

0.0324

0.2160

0.1080

0.1170

0.0540

0.0936

0.2610

0.0252

0.2556

0.0576

103

0.0738

0.0504

104

105

0.0738

0.0720

106

0.1296

108

0.0144

109/898

0.0756

109

0.0360

118

144

0.0018.

0.0180

144/1003

0.0720

147

148

0.1080

146

0.1080

145

0.0018

0.0288

145/876

0.0054

137

BamuliyaMataji

0.0648

138

-(Contd.)

0.0504

136

181

0.0720

182

0.0144

235

0.1728

232

0.1260

233

0.0018

0.0360

231

0.0288

241

258

0.0720

0.0054

259

0.2808

257

255

0.0018

0.0540

391

388

0.1260

362

0.0396

359

0.0720

358

0.0360

0.1080

343

344

0.0018

342

0.0630

329

0.0090

330

0.0540

331

0.2160

332

0.0630

333

0.1584

334

0.0360

336

0.1620

335

0.1440

337

0.1260

147

0.0090 Aama

148

0.1890

154

0.0360

155

0.0810

153

0.0216

156

0.0020

169

0.3140

168

0.0020

171

0.0300

172

0.1800

165

0.2052

184

0.0360 356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 26 , 2008/ MAGHA 6 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

192/269

0.3100

Aama( Contd .)

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

192

0.3230

0.1728

191

210

0.1368

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2008

211

0.0144

226

0.2250

243

0.1512

244

0.0090

का. आ. 165.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खड़ ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूसे एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

246

0.1260

अनुसूची

245

0.0020

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय नये भारतीय

स्थापित i

250

0.0676

तिथि

संख्या मानक (कों)

मानक द्वारा

10.

194

0.2700

Dugari

अतिक्रमित भारतीय

की संख्या, वर्ष

195

0.0252

मानक अथवा

और शीर्षक

202

0.0684

203

0.1080

मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

206

0.0020

(3)

(4)

(1) (2)

207

0.0288

1. आईएस 15774: 2007 आईएस 10812: 1992 30 नवम्बर,

0.0450

208

इस्पात बनाने के लिए आईएस 13839 : 1993 2007 209

0.0810

स्पंज लौहा/प्रत्यक्षं आईएस 13905: 1993

0.0252

213

अपचयित लौहा

214

0.0576

(डीआरआई ) ,

231

0.3888

तप्त और अतप्त

275

0.1620

इष्टिकाकृत

276

0.1170

लौहा-विशिष्टि

277

0.1260

279

0.0504

282

0,1800

283

0.0020

286

0.0720

287

0.0360

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों, नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेत्रई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोथम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

288

0.0540

[संदर्भः एमटीडी 30/टी -26 ] 292

0.0040

डा. ( श्रीमति ) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख (एमटीडी) 293

0.0684

0.2232

320

0.1080

321/1135

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

0.1800

324

323

0.0936

477

0.0540

(Department of Consumer Affairs) BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 11th January, 2008 478

0.0324

479

0.0324

[ F. No. R-31015/ 1 /2008 -OR-II] A. GOSWAMI, Under Secy.

S. O. 165.- In pursuance of clause (b) ofsub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :-

357

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

No & year of

SI . No. & Year of the Indian Standards Indian Stand-

No.

Dateof Estab- lished Established

ards, ifany,

Supersededby the New Indian Standards

(4) (1) (2)

(3)

1 IS 15774 :2007-

30 November ,

IS 10812: 1992

2007

IS 13839: 1993

Sponge Iron/Direct

Reduced Iron (DRI), IS 13905: 1993

HotBriquetted

Iron(HB1) and

ColdBriquetted

Iron( CBI ) for Steel

Making-

Specification

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai , and also Branch Office: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubansewhar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: MTD 30 /T -26] Dr. (Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist ' F ' & Head (Met Engg.) नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2008

'का. आ. 166. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खड़ ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय नये भारतीय

स्थापित

तिथि संख्या मानक (कों)

मानक द्वारा

की संख्या वर्ष

अतिक्रमित भारतीय

और शीर्षक

मानक अथवा

मानकों, यदि कोई हो ,

कीसंख्या और वर्ष

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 1 आईएस /आईएसओ

16162: 2005

31अक्तूबर 2007 सतत अतप्त बेल्लित

इस्पात के शीट उत्पाद-

आयामीय एवं आकार

हेतु छुटें

146 GI/ 2008-4

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भः एमटीडी4/टी-214 ] डा. ( श्रीमति) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं

प्रमुख (एमटीडी) New Delhi , the 11th January, 2008 S. O. 166.- In pursuance of clause (b) ofsub-rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

SI. No. & Year of the No & year of Date of Estab- Indian Standards Indian Stand-

No.

lished Established

ards, ifany,

Supersededby

the New Indian

Standards

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

1 IS /ISO

30 Oct. 2007 16162:2005-

Continuously

cold- rolled steel

sheetproducts

Dimensional and

shape tolerances

(FourthRevision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Koicatta Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai, and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubansewhar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: MTD4/T -214] Dr. (Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist ' F ' & Head(Met Engg . ) नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 167.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खड़ ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक (कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008 /MAGHA 6 , 1929

अनुसूची

संशोधन

संशोधन की

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय

संख्या मानक (कों)

संख्या और लागूहोने कीसंख्या वर्ष

तिथि

कीतिथि और शीर्षक

(2)

(1 )

(3)

(4)

संशोधन

30 नवम्बर 1 आईएस 11795-2007-

2007 ठोस अपचाक संख्या 1 नवम्बर,

2007

सें प्रत्यक्ष अपचयन

के लिए भस्म नरमक

अध्ययन हेतु मार्गदर्शी

सिद्धान्त ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

इस संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवमन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एमटीडी 30/टी -6 ] डा. ( श्रीमति ) स्नेह भाटला, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) New Delhi , the 11th January, 2008 S. O. 167. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Date Sl . No. & Year of the No & year of.

No. Indian Standards ( s ) the amendment from

which amendment (s)

the

amend-

ment

shall

have

effect (1) (2)

(3)

(4) 1 IS

Amendment

11795:2007

30 November , 2007

no. 1

November ,

Guidelines for Ash

2007

Softening studies

on solid Reductants for Direct Reduction

(First Revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai , and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubansewhar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MTD 30/T -6 ] Dr.(Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist ' F' &

Head(Met Engg. ) नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 168. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खड़ ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय नये भारतीय

स्थापित

तिथि

मानक द्वारा

संख्या मानक(कों )

कीसंख्या वर्ष

अतिक्रमित भारतीय

और शीर्षक

मानक अथवा मानकों

यदिकोई हो,

कीसंख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

1. आईएस 12052: 2007 आईएस 12052 : 198731 अक्टूबर

2007 आग वायु के सम्पर्क ,

एवं जल के प्रत्यक्ष

सम्पर्क में होने पर

स्पंजलौह/प्रत्यक्ष

अपचयितलौह

(डी आर आई) के

पुनः आक्सीकरण दर

के निर्धारण की प्रणाली

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भः एमटीडी 30/टी-8 ] डा. ( श्रीमति) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं

प्रमुख (एमटीडी) NewDelhi , the 11th January, 2008 S. O. 168. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

359

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929

[भाग II--खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

SI. No.

No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

Dateof Estab- lished

No & year of Indian Stand- ards ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standards

(3)

(1) (2)

(4) 1. IS 12052 :2007-

IS 12052: 1987 31Oct.

Method of

2007 Determination of

Re-oxidation Rate of Sponge Iron/Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) inContact with Humid air and in direct Contact with Water (First Revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolcatta Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai , and also Branch Office ; Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubansewhar, Coimbatore , Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: MTD 30 /T -8 ] Dr.(Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist ' F ' & Head (Met Engg. ) नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 169.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खड़ ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित क्रम स्थापित भारतीय नये भारतीय

तिथि संख्या मानक(कों)

मानक द्वारा

कीसंख्या वर्ष

अतिक्रमित भारतीय

मानक अथवा मानकों और शीर्षक

यदिकोई हो,

की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

31 दिसम्बर, 1. आईएस 12929: 2007 आईएस 14373 : 1996 आईएस 14405 :1996 2007 भरण सामग्री (लौह

आक्साइड और

प्राकृतिक गैस ) गैस-

आधारित प्रत्यक्ष

अपयचन प्रकृमों के

लिए मार्गदर्शी सिद्धांत

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भः एमटीडी 30/टी-13 ] डा. ( श्रीमति) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं

प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) New Delhi, the 11th January, 2008 S. O. 169. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule( 1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Date of No. & Year of the No & year of

Estab- Sl. No. Indian Standards Indian Stand-

Established

lished

ards, ifany, Supersededby the New Indian Standard

(1) (2)

(4) 1. IS 12929:2007-

31Dec.y 2007

IS 14405:1996 IS 14373:1996

Feedstock( Iron

Oxides and Natural

Gas) forGas-Based

Direct Reduction

Processes-Guidelines

(First Revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards Manak Bhavan, 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai , and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubansewhar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MTD 30 /T - 13 ] Dr. (Mrs. ) SNEH BHATLA , Scientist ' F' & Head(Met Engg .) नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 170.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/ MAGHA 6,1929

अनुसूची

नये भारतीय

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय

स्थापित

तिथि

मानक द्वारा

संख्या मानक(कों)

अतिक्रमित भारतीय

की संख्या वर्ष

मानक अथवा मानकों और शीर्षक

यदिकोई हो,

की संख्या और वर्ष

1. आईएस 11709: 2007 आईएस 11709: 1995 31 अक्तूबर, 2007 इस्पात की प्रयुक्त

सुपुर्दगी की स्थितियाँ

ढलाई की तकनीकी (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भः एमटीडी 14/टी-48 ] डा. ( श्रीमति) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) New Delhi , the 11th January, 2008 S. Q. 170. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1) Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Dateof

No. & year of

Sl. No, & Year of the

Estab-

Indian Stand-

No. Indian Standards

Established

lished

ards , if any,

Superseded by

the New Indian

Standards

IS 11709 : 1995

1. IS 11709: 2007-

31October 2007 Technical Delivery

conditions for

investment

castings of steel

(Second Revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolcatta Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai , and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal,

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Bhubansewhar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MTD 14 /T -48 ] Dr.(Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA , Scientist 'F ' &

Head(Met Engg .) नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 171. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

नयेःभारतीय

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय

स्थापित

तिथि संख्या मानक (कों)

मानक द्वारा

कीसंख्या वर्ष

अतिक्रमित भारतीय

औरशीर्षक

मानक अथवा मानकों

यदिकोई हो ,

की संख्या और वर्ष

1. आईएस 12446: 2007 आईएस 12446: 1988 31 नवम्बर ,

2007 ढलाई में प्रयुक्त बेन्टोनाइट विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भः एमटीडी 14/टी -9 ] डा. ( श्रीमति ) स्नेह भाटला, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) New Delhi , the 11th January, 2008 S. O. 171. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:- SCHEDULE

Date of SI. No. & Year of the No. & year of

Estab-

Indian Stand-

No. Indian Standards Established

lished

ardsif any,

Supersededby

the New Indian

Standard

1. IS 12446 :2007- IS 12446:1988 30Nov. , 2007 Bento nite for use infoundries

Specification (FirstRevision) [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah. Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai , and also branch offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubansewhar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref.: MTD 14 /T - 9 ] Dr. (Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist ' F ' & Head(Met Engg .) नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 172.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक(कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किए गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

संशोधन

संशोधन की

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय

संख्या और

संख्या मानक (कों)

लागूहोने कीसंख्या वर्ष

तिथि

कीतिथि और शीर्षक

1. आईएस 1239:(Part 2 ) : संशोधन संख्या 5 4दिसम्बर, 2007 1992-मृदु इस्पात के अगस्त 2007

पाइप नलिकाकार और

पिटवां इस्पात की अन्य

फिटिंगें भाग 2 मृदु इस्पात

साकेट नलिकाकार तथा

पिटवां इस्पात की अन्य

पाइप फिटिंगें-विशिष्टि

(चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भः एमटीडी 19/टी-31 ] डा. ( श्रीमति) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं

प्रमुख (एमटीडी) New Delhi , the 11th January , 2008 S. O. 172. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

361

भारत का राजपंत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008 /माघ 6, 1929

SCHEDULE

Sl. No. & Year of the No & year of

No. Indian Standard( s) the amendment

amendment(s)

Date from which the amend- ment shall have effect

Amendment no.5

1. IS 1239 (Part 2) :

4Dec. , 2007

August 2007

Tubulars and other

1992 Specification Mild for Steel Tubes , Tubulars and other Wrought Steel Fittings Part 2 Mild Steel Sockets Wrought Steel Pipe Fittings (FourthRevision)

Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Mank Bhavan, 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai , and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubansewhar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MTD 19 /T - 31 ] Dr.(Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist ' F' & Head (Met Engg. ) नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 173.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

नये भारतीय

स्थापित क्रम स्थापित भारतीय

तिथि संख्या मानक (कों)

मानक द्वारा

अतिक्रमित भारतीय

कीसंख्या, वर्ष

मानक अथवा मानकों औरशीर्षक

यदिकोई हो ,

की संख्या और वर्ष

1. आईएस 1254: 2007 आईएस 1254: 1991 30 नवम्बर, 2007 एल्यूमिनियम की

नालीदार चदर

(चौथा पुनरीक्षण) 362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/ MAGHA 6,1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Sl .. No. & Year of the No. Indian Standards Established

Date of Estab- lished

No. & year of Indian Stand- ards if any, Supersededby the New. Indian Standards

इन भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -10002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

IS 1254 : 1991 30 Nov. , 2007

1. IS 1254 : 2007- Corrugated Aluminium sheet (Fourth Revision)

[संदर्भः एमटीडी 7/टी-3 ] डा. ( श्रीमतिः ) स्नेह भाटला, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bu- reau of Indian Standards Mank Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkatta, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai , and also branch of- fices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubansewhar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[ Ref.: MTD 7 /T -3 ] Dr. (Mrs. ) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist ' F ' & Head(Met Engg.) New Delhi , the 11th January, 2008 $ . O. 173. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule (1) of Rules ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby noti- fies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

नई दिल्ली, 14 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 174.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन विनियम) , 1988 के उपनियम (5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाईसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

अगस्त-2007

भारतीय मानक शीषर्क

विभाग

लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

क्र. सं.

लाईसेंस संख्या

भामा संख्या

स्थिति स्टेटस स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह

(1) (2)

(4)

(5)

(8) (3)

(6) (7)

1. 6736180 10-08-07 पलवी पटरीस ,

651: 1992 सीइडी परिचालित

लवन कांचाभ स्टोनवेयर पाइप और फिटिंग विशिष्टि

रिबिना विलज और मंडल , असिफाबाद तलूक अदीलाबाद-504292

2. 6733477 01-08-07

परिचालित

1417 : 99 एमटीडी

मेसर्स श्री शन्मुखा

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

ज्वेलरी मार्ट, डी.नं. 16-3-137, शराफ बाजार , तेनालि-522 001 गुंटूरजिला

3. 6733578 01-08-07

परिचालित

1417 : 99 एमटीडी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मेसर्स एम. नेमिचंद जैन ज्वेलर्स 7-2-830, पॉर्ट मार्केट सिकंदराबाद-500 003

4. 6739186 14-08-07

परिचालित

1417 : 99 एमटीडी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मेसर्स विनायकाज्वेलर्स शॉप नं. 51 , सी.पी. रेड्डी कांप्लेक्स चौरास्ता, हनमकोंडा-506 001 वरंगल जिला 363

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(8)

(5)

(6) (7) (2)

(4)

(3)

(1)

14-08-07

एमटीडी परिचालित 5. 6739128

1417 : 99

मैसर्स के. एन .मूर्ती ज्वैलर्स डी.नं. 6-2-202 , चौरास्ता हनमकोंडा वरंगल-506 001

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एमटीडी परिचालित 14-08-07

6. 6739388

1417 : 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातु,एं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स जी. बजरंग लाल्स 3-3-417 , इम्मडिशेट्टि बिल्डिंग महंकालि मंदिर के सामने सिकंदराबाद-500 003 हैदराबाद जिला

7. 6742074 14-08-07

1417 : 99 एमटीडी परिचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स गणेश एंड कं. 22-5-99, 100 गुलजार हाऊस हैदराबाद-500 002 आन्ध्र प्रदेश

एमटीडी परिचालित 8. 6742175 23-08-07.

1417 : 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स शिवराज लक्ष्मीचंद जैन ज्वैलर्स 6-1-681 , खैरताबाद हैदराबाद

9. 6742276 22-08-07

एमटीडी परिचालित

1417 : 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स सुरेश ज्वैलर्स 15-4-50 , रामालयम के पास बिग बाजार , कंदुकूरू-523 105 प्रकाशम जिला

31-08-07

10. 6744179

141799 एमटीडी परिचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स चंदना ब्रदर्स ज्वैलर्स (तिरूपति) प्रा. लि. 19, टी. के.स्ट्रीट तिरूपति-517 501

चित्तूर जिला

22-08-07

1417 : 99 एमटीडी परिचालित 11. 6741476

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स गणेश एंड कं. 22-5-99, 100 गुलजार हाऊस हैदराबाद-500 002

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

16-08-07

1709 : 1984 इटीडी परिचालित मैसर्स चन्दगोतिया मेटल्स

12. 6744078

ईलेट्रिक फैन मोटर्स के लिए केपसीटर्स

(प्रै ) लिमिटेड 5-55/1, दूलापल्ली, आईडीऐ जीडिमेटला हैदराबाद-500 055

आर आर जिला आन्ध्रप्रदेश

10212

16-08-07

कोरूगेटिड फाइबर बोर्ड

सीइडी परिचालित 13. 6740474

मैसर्स एक्सपलो पेक सारवे नं: 63,

(Pt1)

बाक्सेस फोर कमर्शियल हाई एक्सप्लोसिंग्स

आईकांभ फेक्टरी के पास नागारम विलेज, कीसरा मनडल , हैदराबाद , जिलाः रंगारेडी आन्ध्र प्रदेश 364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/MAGHA 6 , 1929

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

(5) 08-08-07

14. 6741173

53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

मैसर्स प्रियाँका इंडस्ट्रीस नियर गवर्नमेंट पोल्ट्री फार्म उटकूर विलेज सी.के.दि मंडल डापा जिला ( आं.प्र. ) 15. 6741274 13-08-07

53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

मैसर्स श्री लक्ष्मी वेंकटेशवरा इंडस्ट्रीस प्लाट नं. 67,68 एंड 69 , आई डी ए कडापा (आ.प्र. )-500052 !

08-08-07

16. 6741375.

53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

मैसर्ससिंधु इंडस्ट्रीस सर्वे नं. 3ए , इलेक्ट्रिकल सब स्टेशन के पीछे चुक्कालूर गन्नीवारीपल्ली ( पंचायत ) ताडिपती -515 411 अनंतपूर जिला ( आं प्र. ) 17. 6741779 10-08-07

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

मैसर्स रामाकृष्णा प्यूरिफाइड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर हा. नंः 3-45/4 , आर टी सी कालोनी के पास कोमरिपल्ली (वि ) , हसनपर्ती ( मं) वरंगल , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

08-08-07

18. 6736685

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

मैसर्स गंगा पैकैज्ड ड्रिंकिंगवाटर #3-136, रविन्द्र नगर नंदिपहाड ( वि ) , मिरयालगुडा, नलगोंडाजिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश-508 207 09-08-07

19. 6737182

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

मैसर्स हिमालय एक्वा इन्डस्ट्रीस सर्वे नंः 325- पी-1 खानापूर (गाँव ) निजामाबाद जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश -503 003 20.

08-08-07

6738285

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

मैसर्स कोकोनट पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर नंदीपाडू (वि ) , मिरयलागुडा (मं) जिलाः नलगोंडा आन्ध्र प्रदेश-508 207 21. 6745686 30-08-07

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

मैसर्स न्यूत्रिवेणी प्यूरिफाइड वाटर एक्वाप्रोडक्टस् ओ एफ सी स्टेशन के सामने मदनपल्ली रोड , मुलकलचेरूवु पोस्ट एण्ड मंडल चित्तूर जिला. आन्ध्र प्रदेश

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii)] (6) (7)

(8) 12269: 87 सीएडी परिचालित 12269 : 87 सीएडी परिचालित 12269 : 87 सीएडी परिचालित 14543: 04 एफएडी परिचालित 14543 : 04 एफएडी परिचालित

एफएडी परिचालित 14543 : 04

परिचालित 14543 : 04 एफएडी

एफएडी परिचालित 14543: 04 365

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

मैसर्स इडस पैकेज्ड 22. 6743985 30-08-07

ड्रिंकिंगवाटर

सर्वे सं. 49/2 , अलगयपालेम कारेडू विलेज एण्ड पोस्ट उलवपाडु मंडल , प्रकासम

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला :

17-08-07

23. 6740171

मैसर्स विजया केस्टिंग वर्क्स प्लाट नं 12/15 , ब्लाक नं एफ- XIX जवहर आटोनगर विजयवाडा-520007 क्रिष्णजिला

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

(8)

(7)

(6)

(5)

परिचालित

एफएडी

14543 : 04

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

एफएडी परिचालित स्लूस वाल्व्फार वाटर वर्क्स 14846 : 2000 परपजेस से 50,65,80, 100,125,150,200,250 एंड 300 एम एम तक ) नामिनल प्रेषर ( पि एन ) इन एम पी ऐ

पिएन 1.0

सितम्बर-2007

लाईसेंस

लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

संख्या

क्र. सं.

स्वीकृत करने कीतिथि वर्ष/माह

(3)

(4)

(1) (2)

10-09-07

1. 6745888

मैसर्स मुसद्दिलाल ज्वैलर्स 5-9-57/5 , 6 एंड 7 बशीरबाग

हैदराबाद-500 063 10-09-07

2. 6745989

मैसर्स धनलक्ष्मी ज्वैलर्स 7-2-770/775 , पहला मंजिल शाप नं. 8 एंड 9 , पन्ना कांप्लेक्स पॉट मार्केट

सिकंदराबाद-500 003 17-09-07 मैसर्स नागिल्लाज्वैलर्स 3. 6748894

16-120 , 16-120/ 1 मेन रोड, शादनगर महबूबनगर जिला-509216 4. 6751075 21-09-07 मैसर्स संघी ज्वैलर्स प्रा.लि. 3-6-290/19 पहली मंजिल साधना

बिल्डिंग हैदरगुडा

हैदराबाद-500 029 5. 6744684 04-09-07 मैसर्स हीराभाईज्वैलर्स 5-7-607, नाम्पल्ली हैदराबाद-500 001 146 G1/2008-5

विभाग

भारतीय मानक शीषर्क

स्थिति स्टेटर्स

भामा संख्या

(8)

(7)

(6)

(5)

एमटीडी परिचालित

1417 : 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एमटीडी परिचालित

1417: 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एमटीडी परिचालित

1417: 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एमटीडी परिचालित

1417 : 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

परिचालित

एमटीडी

1417 : 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन 366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/MAGHA 6,1929

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii)] (1) (2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(7)

(8)

(6)

6. 6744785 04-09-07

एमटीडी परिचालित

1417 : 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स श्री दुर्गा ज्वेलर्स 7-1-618/एनजी/ जी 21 से जी 23 आदित्य एनक्लेव सारथी स्टूडियो के सामने अमीरपेट, हैदराबाद-500 016

7. 6744886 04-09-07

परिचालित

1417 : 99 एमटीडी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स आरके ज्वेलर्स 5-8-599/ एफ 10 पहला मंजिल , रतनमाल कांप्लेक्स , मुबारक लेन , आबिस हैदराबाद-500 001

11-09-07

8. 6747185

1786 : 85 सिइडी परिचालित

कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च सामर्यि विकसित इस्पात धड और तार

आनंद इस्पात उद्योग लिमिटेड सर्वे नं. 85 , तिम्मापूर कोत्तूर मंडल महबूबनगर जिला

9. 6748995 17-09-07

2112 : 03 एमटीडी परिचालित

चाँदी एवं चाँदी मिश्रधातुएँ, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन विशिष्टि

मैसर्स नागिल्ला ज्वेलर्स 16-120 , 16-120 /1 मेइन रोड , शादनगर महबूबनगर जिला-509 216

6748692 11-09-07

10.

परिचालित

एफएडी

मलाईराहत दूध पाउडर-

13334 Pt1

प्रकाशम डि मिल्क प्रोडयूसर्स म्यूचलिएड़ेड़ को- आप. यूनियन लि. कर्नूल रोड़ , आर आर ड़ि, वोंगोल , आंध्र प्रदेश

04-09-07

11. 6748793.

एफएडी परिचालित

14543 : 04

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

मैसर्स शिवा गंगा इंडस्ट्रिस डोर नं. 20-223 , प्रभाकर स्ट्रिट ओल्ड टवून अनंतपूर (एपी ) -515 001

12. 6749391 11-09-07

एफएडी परिचालित

14543 : 04

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

मैसर्स हशौ पैकेज्ड ड्रिकिंगवाटर बंग्लो सेंटर के पास,विद्युत कार्यालय के सामने, विंजामूर -524 228 नेल्लूर जिला आंध्र प्रदेश

13. 6750073 11-09-07

14543 : 04 एफएडी परिचालित

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

मैसर्स मैती लिवंग वाटर एस-2 , इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट कद्रि विलेज एंड मंडल अनंतपुर जिला

6747286

11-09-07

14543 : 04 एफएडी परिचालित

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

मैसर्स उशोदया फुड प्रोडक्टस एंड बीवेरेजेस 3-7-134, हिमापुरी कालोनी मन्सूराबाद, एल.बी. नगरच सरूरनगर मंडल-502 295 रंगारेड्डीजिला 367

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ6 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(5) (3)

(4)

(1) (2)

12-09-07

15. 6747387

मैसर्स आराधना फडस एंड जूसेस ( प्रा. ) लिमिटेड ए सबसिडयरि ऑफ पेप्सिको इंडिया होलडिंग्स पोतिरेड्‌डीपल्ली विलेज संगारेड्डी मंडल-502 295 मेडकजिला

11-09-07

6746991

मैसर्स श्री लक्षमी बीवरेजेस प्लाट नं. 15 , सर्वे नं. 250 अश्विन कालोनी कोंमपल्ली, खुत्बुल्लापुर मंडल रंगारेड्डी (एपी ) 17. 6747084 04-09-07 मैसर्स साई सात्विक बीवरेजेस नं. 2-7-31 , राम नगर संगारेड्डी मेडक (एपी)

18. 6745181 03-09-07 मैसर्स धन लक्ष्मी इन्डस्ट्रीज सर्वे नं. 5/1 एण्ड4/1-2 रेबालाविलेज बूच्चिरेडिड्‌यालेम मंडल नेल्लूरजिला, आन्ध्र प्रदेश 19. 6745282 03-09-07 मैसर्स तिरूमला इन्डस्ट्रीस सर्वे नं. :50 , नार्सपूर (विलेज) , मंचेरियाल मंडल , अदिलाबाद जिला , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

(7)

(8 )

(6)

परिचालित

एफएडी

14543 : 04

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

एफएडी परिचालित 14543 : 04

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक भिनरल जल के अलावा )

एफएडी परिचालित 14543: 04

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

एफएडी परिचालित 14543 : 04

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

एफएडी परिचालित 14543: 04

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

[सं. सी. एम डी 13:11 ] ए. के. तलवार , उप महानिदेशक (मुहर )

NewDelhi , the 14th January , 2008

S.O. 174.-- In pursuance of sub-regulation (5 ) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations , 1988, ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars ofwhich are given in the following Schedule:

SCHEDULE

August 2007

GOL Date

SI . CML No. Licensee Name & Address

IS No. & Product No.

Status Remarks Division

Validity

9 09-08-2008 CED

IS651: 1992

10-08-2007

1 6736180 Pallavipotteries

Operative

Salt glazed stone-

ware pipe and

fittings

Rebbena village & mandal Asifabad Taluk Adilabad District-504 292 Adilabad Rebbena Village Andhra Pradesh 504292 368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/MAGHA 6, 1929

2 6733477

01-08-2007

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 5

MTD

IS 1417 : 1999

02-08-2010

Operative

Gold and gold

alloys,jewellery/

artefacts -fineness

andmarking

Sri Shanmukha JewelleryMart D. No. 16-3-137, SharoffBaz Guntur Tenali Andhra Pradesh 522001

3 6733578 M. Nemichand Jain 01-08-2007 Jewellers 7-2-830, Pot Market Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh 500003

02-08-2010

IS 1417 : 1999

MTD Operative

Goldandgold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -fineness

andmarking

4 6739186

16-08-2010 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

14-08-2007

Operative

Goldand gold

alloys,jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

Vinayaka Jewellers Shop No. 51 , C.P. Reddy Complex, Chowrastha Warangal Hanamkonda Andhra Pradesh 506001

5 6739287

14-08-2007 16-08-2010 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

Operative

Gold andgold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

K.N. Murthy Jewellers D. No. 6-2-202, Chowrastha Warangal Hanamkonda Andhra Pradesh 506001

6 6739388

14-08-2007 IS 1417: 1999

16-08-2010 MTD Operative

Gold and gold

alloys , jewellery/ .

artefacts- fineness

andmarking

G.BajrangLal's 3-3-417, Immadishetty Building Opp.Mahankali Temple Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh 500003

7 6742074

23-08-2010 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

Ganesh Jewellers 23-08-2007 8-11-23 , RNT Road Warangal Andhra Pradesh 506002

Operative

Gold andgold

alloys,jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

8 6742175

22-08-2008 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

23-08-2007

Shivraj Laxmichand JainJewellers 6-1-681 , Khairatabad Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

9 6742276

22-08-2007

Operative 22-08-2010

Gold and gold alloys ,jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking- IS 1417:1999

MTD Operative

Gold andgold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

Suresh Jewellers 15-4-50,Near Ramalayam BigBazaar Prakasam Kandukur Andhra Pradesh 523105 369

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

4 2

10 6744179

31-08-2007 6

9 5

02-09-2010 MTD

IS 1417 : 1999

Chandana Brothers Jewellers (Tirupati )

Operative

Goldandgold

alloys , jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

Pvt . Ltd. 19, T.K. Street Chittor Tirupati Andhra Pradesh 517501

22-08-2007 21-08-2010 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

11 6741476 Ganesh & Co. 22-5-99, 100 GulzarHouse Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500002

Operative

Gold andgold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts-fineness

andmarking

12 6744078

16-08-2007

Chandgothia Metals Pvt. Ltd.

IS 1709 : 1984

02-09-2008 EID Operative,

Capacitors for

electric fan motors

5-55/ 1 , Dullapally IDA, Jeedimetla Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500055

16-08-2007 13 6740474

IS 10212 :

19-08-2008 CHD Operative

Part1: 198

Generalrequire

ments for packages

ofexplosives : Part 1

commercialhigh

explosives

Explopack Near ICOMM Factory, SurveyNo. 63 , Nagaram Village Keesara Mandal Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

14 6741173

08-08-2007

CED

IS 12269 : 1987 21-08-2008

Operative

53 grade ordinary

portland cement

Priyanka Industries Near Govt . Poultry Farm Utukur Village, C.K. Dinne Mandal Cuddapah District. Cuddapah Andhra Pradesh 516003

13-08-2007 21-08-2008

IS 12269: 1987

15 6741274

CED Operative

53grade ordinary

portland cement

Sri Lakshmi Venkateswara Industries Plot No. 67 , 68 & 69 IDA , Kadapa Cuddapah Andhra Pradesh

08-08-2007 21-08-2008

IS 12269 : 1987

16 6741375

CED Operative

53grade ordinary

portland cement

Sindhu Industries Behind Electrical Substation Chukkalur Road Gannivaripalli (Panchayat) Tadipatri Anantapur Tadipatri Andhra Pradesh 515411 370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/MAGHA 6, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 1

9 17. 6741779 Ramakrishna

10-08-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

FAD

21-08-2008

Operative

Packageddrinking water ( other than packaged natural Mineralwater)-

PurifiedDrinking Water H. No. 3-45/4, Near R.T.C. Colony, Komatipally (V) Warangal , Hasnaparthy(M) Andhra Pradesh

18. 6736685

IS14543 : 2004

9-08-2008 FAD

08-08-2007

Operative 1

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)-

M/sGangaPackaged DrinkingWater # 3-136 , Ravindra Nagar, Nandipahad Village,Nalgonda Miryalguda Andhra Pradesh 508207

09-08-2007

19. 6737182

IS 14543 : 2004

12-08-2008 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineralwater)-

Himalaya Aqua Industries, Sy. No. 325- P1 , Khanapur (Village) Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh 503003

20. 6738285

08-08-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

13-08-2008 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineralwater)-

M/s. Coconut Packaged Drinking Water Nandipadu (V) Miryalaguda(M) Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh 508207

21. 6745686

30-08-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

FAD

09-09-2008

Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)-

NewTriveni Purified Water AquaProducts Opp .OFC Station Madanapally Road Mulakalacheruvu Post& Mandal Chittoor District, Chittor Mulakalacheruvu, Andhra Pradesh

30-08-2007 IS 14543: 2004

30-08-2008 FAD

22. 6743985

Operative

Packaged drinking water ( other than packaged natural mineral water)-

Indus Packaged Drinking Water Sy.No. 49/2 Alagayapalem Karedu Village & PostUlavapadu Mandal, Prakasam , District Prakasam , KareduVillage, Andhra Pradesh भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5. 1

371

16-08-2008

IS14846: 2000

23. 6740171 M/sVijaya Casting 17-08-2007 Works

PlotNo. 12/15

CED

Operative

Sluice valve for

waterworks.

purposes (50 to

1200mm size)

Block No. F -XIX Jawahar Autonagar Krishna Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh 520007

SEPTEMBER 2007

CML No.

ISNo.& Product Licensee Name & Gol Date Address

Sl . No.

5 2

1. 6745888

Division Status Remarks Validity

9 6

10-09-2010 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

10-09-2007 Musaddilal Jewellers

5-9-57/5,6& 7 Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500063

Operative

Gold and gold

alloys , jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

10-09-2007 2. 6745989 Dhanalaxmi Jewellers

IS 1417 : 1999

7-2-/770/775

10-09-2010 MTD Operative

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

1stFloor, Shop No. 8& 9 Panna Complex, Potmarket Hyderabad, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500003

3. 6748894

17-09-2007 IS 1417: 1999

NagillaJewellers

16-120, 16-120/1

MTD

17-09-2010

Operative

Gold andgold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

MainRoad Mahbubnagar , ShadNagar, Andhra Pradesh 509216

21-09-2007 4. 6751075

25-09-2010 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

Sanghi Jewellers

Pvt. Ltd.

Operative

Gold and gold

alloys,jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

3-6-290/19 , 1st Floor Sadhana Building Hyderguda Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500029

IS 1417: 1999

5. 6744684

04-09-2007 Heerabhai Jewellers

5-7-607, Nampally Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500001

03-09-2010 MTD Operative

Gold and gold

alloys,jewellery/

artefacts- fineness

andmarking

372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008 /MAGHA 6, 1929

5 6. 6744785

IS 1417: 1999

04-09-2007 SriDurga Jewellers 3-4-119/M

Goldandgold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts -fineness and marking-

Opp: Public School Ramanthapur Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500013

7. 6744886

04-09-2007

[PART- II SEC. 3( ii) ] 6

9 03-09-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417: 1999

Goldand gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking-

AarkayJewellers 5-8-599/F 10, 1stFloor Ratanmall Complex Mubarak Lane, Abids Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500001

8. 6747185

11-09-2007 03-09-2010 MTD Operative CED

IS 1786: 1985

M/sAnand Ispat

High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete rein- forcement Udyog Limited 5-9-208, Anand Complex chirag Ali Lane , Abid Road Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500001

9. 6748995

17-09-2007 13-09-2008

Operative 17-09-2010 MTD

IS 2112 : 2003

Silverand silver alloys,jewellery/ artefacts- fineness andmarking-

16-120, 16-120/ 1 Main Road Mahbubnagar ShadNagar Andhra Pradesh 509216 Nagilla Jewellers

10. 6748692 Prakasam District 11-09-2007 1S 13334 : Part 1 : 199 Skimmedmilk powder-part I : standard grade

Milk, Producer Mutually Aided Co-operative Union Limited, Kurnool Road Rangareddi Ongole Andhra Pradesh 523002

IS 14543 : 2004

11. 6748793

04-09-2007

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)-

Sri SivaGangą Industries D. No. 20-223, Prabahkar Street Old Town Anantapur Andhra Pradesh 515001

11-09-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

12. 6749391

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)-

Harsha Packaged DrinkingWater NearBunglowCentre Opp. Current Office Vinjamur -524228 Nellore District Nellore Vinjanur Andhra Pradesh 524228

Operative FAD

17-09-2008

Operative FAD

17-09-2008

Operative FAD

19-09-2008

Operative 373

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929

[भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

FAD

20-09-2008

IS14543 :2004

13. 6750073

Operative 11-09-2007

Mytry Living Water S-2, Industries Estate Kadiri (V&M) Anantapur Andhra Pradesh

Packageddrinking

water (other than

packagednatural

mineralwater)

13-09-2008 FAD

11-09-2007 IS14543:2004

14. 6747286

Operative

Packageddrinking

water(other than

packaged natural

mineralwater)

Ushodaya Food Products & Beverages 3-7-134,Himapuri Colony Mansoorabad , L.B. Nagar Saroornagar Mandal Rangareddi Andhra Pradesh 500054

FAD

13-09-2008

12-09-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

15. 6747387

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineralwater)

Aaradhana Foods and Juices Pvt . Ltd. ASubsidary of Pepsico IndiaHoldings PothireddypallyVillage Sangareddy Mandal Medex Andhra Pradesh 502295

FAD

IS14543 : 2004 13-09-2008

16. 6746991

Operative 11-09-2007

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineralwater)

Sri LaxmiBeverages PlotNo. 15, Sy. No. 250, AswinColony Kompally, Qutbullapur Mandal Rangareddi Andhra Pradesh

17-09-2008 FAD

17. 6747084

04-09-2007 IS 14543: 2004

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineralwater)

Sai Sathvik Beverages Sy. No. 579/Aa NearBIBO, Klabgoor Sangareddy Medak Andhra Pradesh

IS 14543 : 2004

04-09-2008 FAD

18. 6745181

03-09-2007

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineralwater)

Dhana Lakshmi Industries SyNo. 5/1 & 4/1-2 RebalaVillage Buchireddypalem Mandal Nellore District Nellore Rebala Village Andhra Pradesh

146 G1/ 2008-6 374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008 /MAGHA 6, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

9 19. 6745282

IS 14543 : 2004

05-09-2008 FAD

Thirumala Industries 03-09-2007

Operative SurveyNo. 50 ,

Narspur Village,

Packageddrinking

Adilabad

Mancherial Mandal

Andhra Pradesh

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

[No. CMD/13 : 11]

A. K. TALWAR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली , 14 जनवरी, 2008

का.आ. 175.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एताद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों) की संख्या

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1.

आईएस 4457 : 1982

30जून, 2007 आईएस 4457 : 2007 , सिरैमिक की रलेज रहित काँचाभ अम्ल प्रतिरोधक टाइलें--विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

आईएस 4971 : 1968

30जून, 2007 2. आईएस 4971 : 2007 , औद्योगिक फ्लोर परिसज्जा के चयन की अनुशंसाएं ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सीईडी/राजपत्र]

ए. के. सैनी, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' व प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )

NewDelhi , the 14th January, 2008

S.O. 175. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule (1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Date of Established

No. and year of Indian

No. and Year of the Indian Standards Established

Standards, if any,

Superseded by the

New Indian Standard

(3)

(1)

(2)

(4)

1 .

IS4457: 1982

30June , 2007

I$4457: 2007 Ceramic Unglazed Vitreous Acid Resisting Tiles-Specification (Second Revision)

IS 4971 : 1968

30 June, 2007

IS4971 : 2007 Recommendations for Selection ofIndustrial Floor Finishes ( First Revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and its Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahınedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[ Ref: CED/Gazette]

A. K. SAINI , Scientist ' F' & Head (Civil Engineering) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

375

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929

नई दिल्ली , 14 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 176.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम , 4 के उपविनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्धारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं को लाइसेंस प्रदान किए गए हैं::-

अनुसूची

वैद्यता तिथि

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या

उत्पाद

पार्टी का नाम एवं पता

(कारखाना)

(1)

(4)

(3)

(2)

05-11-2008

7794102

शुभम इण्डस्ट्रिज, डी-59 , पहला माला, स्पान इड काम्प्लेक्स दादरा चेक पोस्ट के पास , दादरा नगर हवेली-396 230 2

7796207

12-11-2008 टेराकाम प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , प्लॉट सं. 250 , कुंडाइम इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , कुंडाइम , पोंडा, गोआ-403115 3.

7799112

25-11-2008 जग्गी इलेक्ट्रॉनिकस और इलेक्ट्रीकल्स, 250 रोड सं 6, मोतीलाल नगर सं 1 , गोरेगाँव पश्चिम, मुबई-400 104

आई एस सं./भाग/खण्ड वर्ष

(5)

(6)

4250:1980 बिजली के घेरलू खाद्य मिक्सर (द्रवीकारक और ग्राइंडर) की विशष्टि

9857:1990 वैल्डिगकेबल

3854:1997 घरेलू और समान प्रयोजनों के लिएस्विचेस

[संख्या केन्द्रीय प्रमाणन विभाग/ 13 : 11 ] ए. के. तलवार, उपमहानिदेशक ( प्रमाणन )

New Delhi , the 14th January, 2008

S.O. 176. In pursuance of sub -regulation (5) ofregulation (4) of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) . Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE Licence No.

Sl . No.

ValidityDate

Product

Name and Address (factory) of

the party

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

05-11-2008

7794102

Shubam Industries D-59 , 1st floor , SpanINDL Complex, NR Dadra Checkpost Dadra (U.T. ) Dadra andNagar Haveli- 396 230

12-11-2008

7796207

Teracom Ltd. 250, Kundaim Industrial Estate , Kundaim North Goa,Goa-403115 .

25-11-2008

7799112

Jaggi Electronics & Electricals 250/2000 Road No.6, Motilal Nager No.1 , Goregaon-W Mumbai-400 104

IS No./part/Sec . year

(5)

(6)

4250: 1980 Specification for Domestic Electric Food-Mixers (Liquidizes and Griders)

9857: 1990 Welding Cables Specification

3854:1997 Switchesfor domestic and similar purposes

[No. CMD/13: 11 ]

A. K. TALWAR, DDG( M) 376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008 /MAGHA 6, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 15 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 177.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में सशोंधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

क्राम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन लागू होनेकी तिथि 1.

संशोधन संख्या नं. 1 , अक्तूबर 2007

31 अक्तूबर 2007 आई एस 431 : 1972 विलायक टाइप , ज्वलनशील पेन्ट रिमूवर की विशष्टि (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

संशोधन संख्या नं. 3 , अक्तूबर 2007

31 अक्तूबर 2007 आई एस 13238 : 1991 एपॉक्सी आधारित जिंक फॉस्फेट प्राइमर ( दो पैक ) - विशष्टि

संशोधन संख्या नं. 1 , अक्तूबर 2007

31 अक्तूबर 2007 आई एस 2075 :2000 तैयार मिश्रित रंग रोगन , स्टोविंग रेड ऑक्साइड , जिंक क्रोम वाले प्राइमिंग -विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

इन मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो मानक , भवन 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद , जयपु , कामपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सी एच डी 20/आई एस 431 , 13238 एवं 2075 ]

ई. देवेन्दर , वैज्ञानिक-एफ ( रसायन)

New Delhi , the 15th January , 2008

S.O. 177.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which givenin the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the Indian Standards

Sl. No.

No. and year ofthe amendment .

Date from which the amendment shall have effect 1.

Amendment No.1 , October 2007

31 October 2007

IS 431 : 1972 Specification for Paint Remover , Solvent Type , Flammable (Second Revision)

Amendment No.3 , October 2007

31October 2007

IS 13238 : 1991 Epoxy Based Zinc Phosphate Primer(Two Pack) - Specification

Amendment No.1 , October 2007

31October 2007

IS 2075 :2000 Ready Mixed Paint, Stoving, Red Oxide Zinc Chrome , Priming-Specification (Second Revision)

Copy ofthese standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Banglore, Bhopal , Bubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvanthapuram.

[Ref: CHD 20/IS 431 , IS 13238 & IS 2075 ]

E. DEVENDER, Scientist F ( Chemical) 377

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माष 6, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 15 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 178.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक (कों) में सशोंधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय संशोधन की संशोधन लागू संख्या मानक की संख्या संख्या और होने की और वर्ष

तिथि

तिथि 1 आई एस 2888 : संशोधन संख्या 31 अक्तुबर, 2004प्रसाधन

2007

अक्तुबर 1 ,

2007

साबुन- विशिष्टि

(तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इन मानकों की प्रतियों भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी , हैदाबाद, जयपरु, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सी एच डी 25 /टी -2888 ]

ई. देवेन्दर, वैज्ञानिक-एफ (रसायन) New Delhi , the 15th January, 2008

S.O. 178. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule (1) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amend- ments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

Date from No and title ofthe No. and year

of the

Indian Standards

which the No.

amendment amendment Shall have effect 1

IS2888:2004

Amendmet 31 October ,

2007

No. 1, October

Toilet soap

2007

Specification

(Third Revision)

Copy to these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Banglore, Bhopal , Bubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvanthapuram .

[Ref: CHD 25/T -2888] E. DEVENDER, Scientist- ' F' ( Chemical) नई दिल्ली, 15 जनवरी , 2008.

का.आ. 179.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

क्रम

स्थापित तिथि संशोधित भारतीय नये भारतीय

मानक द्वारा

संख्या मानक (कों)

कीसंख्या वर्ष अतिक्रमित

औरशीर्षक

भारतीय मानक

अथवा मानकों,

यदिकोई हों,

की संख्या और वर्ष

30नवम्बर आई एस 15779 :

2007 :2007 धातु

सम्मिश्र सिन्टेन-

विशष्टि

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नईदिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयपु, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[संदर्भ : सी एच डी 17/आई एस 15779 ]

ई. देवेन्दर, वैज्ञानिक- एफ (रसायन) New Delhi , the 15th January, 2008

S.O. 179. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub rule (1) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the 378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/MAGHA 6, 1929

Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in th Sched- ule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each

SCHEDULE

Date of No. and year ofthe No. and year

Sl . No.

Established Indian Standards Established

ofthe Indian Standards, Ifany, Super- seded by the New Indian Standard

1 IS15779:2007

30November, 2007 MetalComplex

Syntans-speci-

fication

Copy of this standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Banglore , Bhopal , Bubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvanthapuram.

[Ref: CHD 17/IS - 15779 ] E. DEVENDAR, Scientist -F (Chemical ) 1 नई दिल्ली, 15 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 180.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप-नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक (कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय

संशोधन लागू

होने की तिथि संख्या मानक की संख्या औरवर्ष

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन संख्या

आई एस 15662 :

31दिसम्बर, 2007 2006 भारश्रित 1, दिसम्बर

2007

बांधो तथा उत्पलावी

संरचनाओं के

भूगर्भीय अन्वेषण

कीरीति संहिता

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9, बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपणु, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[संदर्भ : डब्लूआर डी /जी-117 ]

ए. एम. डेविड, वैज्ञानिक-ई, निदेशक

(जल संसाधान विभाग ) New Delhi, the 15th January, 2008

S.O. 180. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub- rule ( 1) of Rule (7) of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No title and year No. and year

No. ofthe Indian ofthe amend-

Standards

ment

Datefrom which the amendment shall have effect

1 2

1 IS 15662:2006

Geological

31December 2007

Amendment No.1 , December , 2007

Exploration

forGravity

Dams and

Overflow

Structures-Code

ofPractice

Copy to this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Banglore , Bhopal , Bubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvanthapuram.

[Ref: WRD/G - 117]

A.M. DAVID , Sc -E , Director (Water Resources Deptt .) नई दिल्ली, 16 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 181.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्र. स्थापित भारतीय

स्थापित

नये भारतीय मानक

तिथि

द्वारा अतिक्रमित

सं. मानक (कों) की

संख्या वर्ष और

भारतीय मानक

शीर्षक

अथवा मानकों,

यदिकोई हो, की

संख्या और वर्ष

(4) (1) (2)

(3)

1. आई एस/आई एस

31अगस्त,

2007 ओ/पीएएस 17001 :2005

अंनुरूपता मुल्यांकन-

निष्पक्षता-सिद्धांत

और अपेक्षाएं

आई एस/ आई एस

31अगस्त,

2007 ओ/पीएएस 17002:2004

गोपनियता-सिद्धांत

2. अनुरूपता मुल्यांकन- : और अपेक्षाएं

31अगस्त,

2007 ओ/पीएएस 17003 :2004

अनुरूपता मुल्यांकन- शिकायतें और अपील-

3. आई एस/आई एस सिद्धांत और अपेक्षाएं

31अगस्त,

2007 4. आई एस/आई एस ओ/पीएएस 17004:2005 अनुरूपता मुल्यांकन- सूचना प्रकटीकरण- सिद्धांत और अपेक्षाएं

31अगस्त,

2007 5. आई एस/आई एस ओ/आईईसी 17021 :2006 अनुरूपता मुल्यांकन- प्रबंध पद्धतियों का ऑडिट तथा प्रमाणन प्रदान करने वाले निकायों कीअपेक्षाएं

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर ,

379

भारत. का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयजयपरु, कानपुर, नागपुर पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[संदर्भ: आईआरडी 1/आई एस/ आईएसओ/पीएएस 17001/आई एस/आईएसओ/पीएएस 17002/ आई एस/ आईएसओ/पीएएस 17003/ आई एस/आईएसओ/पीएएस 17004/आई एस/आईएसओ/आई ई सी 17021 ] आर. के. बजाज , वैज्ञानिक- ई ( अन्तर्राष्ट्रीय सम्पर्क एवं तकनीकी सूचना सेवा विभाग ) New Delhi, the 16th January, 2008

S.O. 181.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub- rule (1) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, Particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Date Sl. No. & Year ofthe

No. & Year of

of No. Indian Standards Indian Standards, Established

Estab-

Ifany, Superseded

lished

by the New Indian Standard

(3)

(4) (1) (2)

31 Aug. ,

2007 1. IS/ISO/PAS 17001 :2005 Conformity Assesment Impartiality-Principles And Requirements

31Aug. ,

2007. 2. IS/ISO/PAS 17002:2004 Conformity Assesment Confidentiality-Principles And Requirements

31Aug. ,

2007 3. IS/ISO/PAS 17003 : 2004 Conformity Assesment Complaints and Appeals -PrinciplesAnd Requirements

31Aug. ,

2007 4. IS/ISO/PAS 17004 :2005 Conformity Assesment Disclosure of Information -PrinciplesAnd Requirements

5. IS/ISO/PAS 17021 : 2006

31 Aug. ,

2007 Conformity Assesment

Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of

Managemnt System

Copy to these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur 380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/MAGHA 6 , 1929

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Banglore , Bhopal , Bubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvanthapuram .

[Ref: IRD 1 /IS /ISO/PAS 17001 , IS/ISO/PAS 17002, IS/ISO/PAS 17003 , IS/ISO/ PAS 17004, IS/ISO/IEC 17021 ] R. K. BAJAJ, Sc . E. ( International Relations and Technical Information Service Deptt .) नई दिल्ली , 16 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 182.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उप-नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्र. स्थापित भारतीय

नये भारतीय मानक स्थापित

तिथि

द्वारा अतिक्रमित

सं. मानक (कों) की

भारतीय मानक

संख्या वर्ष और

शीर्षक

अथवामानकों,

यदिकोई हो , की

संख्या और वर्ष

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 1. आईएस 2428 :2007/

नवम्बर,

2007 आईएसओ 513:2004

नियत कार्तन धारों से धातु

हटाने के लिए कठोर

कर्तन सामग्रियों का

वर्गीकरण और अनुप्रयोग-

मुख्य समूहों का अभिमान

और अनुप्रयोग समूह

(दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

2. आईएस $ 830:2007/

अक्तूबर,

2007 आईएसओ 9083 :2001

स्पर और कुंडलित गियरों

की भार क्षमता का

परिकलन-मेरीन गियरों

काअनुप्रयोग

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों :

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपणु, कानपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्धहैं ।

[संदर्भ : पीजीडी/जी-3.5 ] पी. सी. जोशी , वैज्ञानिक ' ई' एवं प्रमुख ( पीजीडी) New Delhi , the 16th January, 2008

S.O. 182. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule (1) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , Particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Date Sl . No. & Year of the

No. & Year of

of No. Indian Standards

Indian Standards , Established

Estab-

Ifany, Superseded

by the New Indian lished

Standards

(1)

(4) (2)

(3)

1. IS 2428 :2007/

Nov. ,

2007 ISO 513 :2004

Classification and

application of hard

cutting materials for

metal removal with

defined cutting edges

-Designation of the

maingroups and

groups of application (Second Revision)

2. IS 8830 :2007/

Oct., ISO 9083 :2001

2007 Calculation of load

capacity of spur and

helical gears-

Application to marine

gears-(First Revision)

Copy of these standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Banglore , Bhopal , Bubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvanthapuram .

[Ref: PGD/G-3.5 ] P. C. JOSHI , Scientist ' E' & Head (PGD) 381 [भाग 11-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ6, 1929

New Delhi , the 16th January, 2008

नई दिल्ली, 16 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 183.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न भारतीय मानकों में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

S.O. 183. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule (1) of Rule 7 ofBureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been amended on the date indicated against each:

अनुसूची

SCHEDULE

क्र. संशोधन भारतीय

सं. मानर्क की संख्या

संशोधन की संख्या और

Sl. No.

और शीर्षक वर्ष

तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथिं

No. of Amendments &Date

No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards Established

Date of Estab- lished (2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

(3)

(4)

(1) (2)

दिसम्बर,

2007

Dec.

2007 1. आईएस 10490: 1983 ब्रीचलोडिंग शॉट गन, एक और दो नालवाली कीविशिष्टि

IS 10490: 1983 Specification for breech loading shot guns , single and doublebarrel

दिसम्बर ,

2007

Dec.

2007 2. आईएस 10491 : 1983 मजल लोडिंग शॉट गन , एक, और दो नालवाली कीविशिष्ट

2. IS 10491 : 1983 Specification for muzzle floading shot guns, single and double barrel

दिसम्बर, 2007

Dec. 2007 3. आईएस 15674:2006 अल्ट्रासनिक मीटर द्वारा प्राकृतिक गैस का प्रवाह मापन

3. IS 15674:2006 Flow measurement ofnatural gas by ultrasonic meter

दिसम्बर, 2007

Dec. 2007 4. आईएस 15675 :2006 ओरोफिस प्लेट मीटर द्वारा प्राकृतिक गैस अथवा फ्ल्यूड का प्रवाह मापन

4. IS 15675 :2006 Flow measurement ofnatural gas and fluids byorifice platemeters

दिसम्बर ,

2007

Dec. 2007 5. आईएस 15676:2006 टरबाईन मीटर द्वारा प्राकृतिक गैस का प्रवाह मापन

5. IS 15676:2006 Flow measurement ofnatural gas by turbine meters

दिसम्बर,

2007

Dec. 2007 6. आईएस 15677 :2006 प्राकृतिक गैस का मापन- रीतिसंहिता

6. IS15677:2006 Metering of Natural gas-Code of practice

इन भारतीय मानकों के संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपणु, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: पीजीडी/जी-3.5 ]

Copy of these Amendments of Standards is avail- able for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg. New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Banglore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune and Thiruvanthapuram .

[Ref: PGD/G-3.5 ] पी. सी. जोशी , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख ( पीजीडी)

P. C. JOSHI , Scientist ' E' & Head (PGD) 146 GI/ 2008-7 382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008 /MAGHA6 , 1929

श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2007

का.आ. 184.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 23/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2002 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/412/2001- आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 3 I st December , 2007 S.O. 184. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 23/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Mumbal as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 31-12-2007.

[No. L- 12012/412/2001 - IR(B- I ) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2 ,

MUMBAI

PRESENT

Shri A. A. Lad , Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2/23 OF 2002 Employers in relation to the Management of State Bank of India

IstParty The Assistant General Manager , :

Region 1, 88 C, DGP House , Old Prabhadevi Road , Prabhadevi , Mumbai 400 025

And their Workmen :

The General Secretary,

2nd Party State Bank of India Staff Union 68/86 Harkoovarbai Bldg. , PanditBakle Path , Thakurdiwar Road, Mumbai 400 002.

APPEARANCE :

: Mr. A.G. Pawar , For the Employer

Advocate

Forthe Workmen

: Mr. R.B. Chavan , Advocate.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Dateof reserving Award : 6th September, 2007.

Date of Passing of Award : 15th November , 2007.

AWARD PART - I

The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under :

1. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour , New Delhi, by its Order No. L- 12012/412/2001 - IR(B - I) dated 6th March, 2002 in exercise of powers conferred by Clause(d) ofSub -section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the Management of State Bank of India, Mumbai , dismissing the services of Mrs. S.G. Kokate, an ex - Daftry, w.e.f. 29-3-2000 is justified? If not , what relief the workman concerned is entitled ?"

(2) Claim Statement is filed by the General Secretary of the Union at Exhibit 8 making out the case that , the concerned Workman Shri S.G. Kokate was working with the Ist Party. When he was working as Daftry at Worli Sea face Branch , his services were illegaly terminated and the said action was taken without following due process of law. He was illegally terminated . Enquiry conducted was a farce . Charges were vague . No. opportunity was given to the concerned Workman to test the evidence of the 1st Party. The witnesses were not made available for cross to the concerned Workman . No opportunity was given to the concerned Workman to justify the documents and evidence onwhich the Management relied and observed concerned Workman guilty of the charges. The report of the investigations made by one Mr. Prabhu was not made available for cross and as such said report was not justified. He was not examined by the enquiry officer. Even said witness was not made available for cross to justify his report . Bank Manager who submitted report was also not examined and made available for cross . Concerned Workman when was on leave was called and some writing was taken from him . Ist Party relied on it and treated it as an admission of concerned.Workman and acted upon it and proceeded to terminate his services without any reason. So it is submitted that, enquiry was not conducted by following due process of law, findings given by the Enquiry Officer is perverse and the punishment awarded is disproportionate .

(4) This is disputed by the 1st Party by filing Written Statement at Exhibit 10 stating and contending that, the case made out by the 2nd Party in the Statement ofClaim is not admitted to it . It is denied that , enquiry was not conducted by following due process of law . It is denied that , no opportunity was given to the concerned Workman . It is denied that, documents and witnesses were not made available to the concerned Workman to testify them . It is denied that, enquiry officer did not follow the procedure भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929.

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

and conducted enquiry as per his own ideas . It is denied that, enquiry officer was not having evidence before him to conclude against the concerned Workman. According to 1st Party, no case is made out by 2nd Party . Nothing is stated by the 2nd Party about the charges levelled against the concerned Workman . There were serious charges levelled against the concerned Workman ofnot depositing the amount of customers but in reality depositing less amount in the account of the concerned customers than the actual amount given for deposit . Such instances were noted andwere admitted by the concerned Workman. Since it was a serious offence and admitted by the concerned Workman, punishment awarded was just and proper and does not require any interference.

(5) In view of the above pleadings my Ld . Predecessor framed Issues at Exhibit 12 which I answer as follows:

FINDINGS ISSUES

No 1. Whether the domestic inquiry conducted against the workman was as per the principles of natural justice?

Yes 2. Whether the findings of the enquiry Officer are perverse?

REASONS :

(6) At this stage we are considering the fairness of enquiry and perversity of the findings as preliminary Issues as per directions given at Exhibit 12 on which parties lead their evidence .

383 नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 185.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडियां के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12011 / 16/2003- आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 31st December, 2007

S.O. 185. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 58/2003 ofthe Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India, and their workmen, receivedby the Central Government on 31-12-2007.

[No. L- 12011 / 16/2003 -IR(B-1)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

Shri A. A. Lad , Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT- 2/58 OF 2003

Employers in relation to the Management of State Bank ofIndia

: 1st Party

The General Manager,

Main Branch, Margao

State Bank of India

Goa 403601

And thelr Workmen :

The President,

: 2nd Party

Margao-Goa Unit

(7) To support that, 2nd Party filed affidavit at Exhibit 17. However , Management did not cross examine its witnesses though number of dates were given. Then Union filed closing pursis at Exhibit 20 porting that, at this stage it do not want to lead any evidente. Of that , ist Party did not take congnizance of it, appeared in the Reference and challenged the contentions of the 2nd Party that enquiry was not fair and proper and finding perverse . Even in the affidavit filed at Exhibit 17 in lieu of cross examination, same type of case is made out by the witness of the 2nd Party. However , this remained unchallenged . So I conclude that, enquiry was not fair and proper and finding perverse . So, I answer above Issues to that effect and passes the following order:

ORDER

State Bank of India & Subsidiary Bank Employees Union Goa, Bombay Circle Margao, Goa 403 601

APPEARANCE :

Forthe Employer

(a) I observe enquiry is not fair and Proper and findings perverse.

: Mr. Prakash Kilpady, Advocate

For the Workmen

(b) I direct both the parties to appear on the point of action taken by the 1st Party against the concerned Workman.

Mumbai ,

15thNovember , 2007

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer

: Mr. D.V. Chouguley, Representative.

Mumbai, dated the 15th November , 2007 AWARD

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour , by its Order No. L- 12011 / 16/2003 -IR(B - I) dated 03 /15-09-2003 in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub- 384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/MAGHA 6 , 1929

section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

: i "Whether the action of the Management of State Bank of India, Margao Branch , Goa to recover the loss suffered by it due to 'negligence on the part of Cashiers' is legal andjustified? Ifnot, what relief the workmen are entitled for?"

i (2) Claim Statement is filed at Ex- 8 by the President and Secretary of the State Bank of India and Subsidiary Bank Employees Union, Goa making out case that, several employees of the first party are members of the union . Union raised dispute on behalf of its members regarding fake currency notes and recovery of amount of such fake currency notes detected by the Reserve Bank of India during scrutiny from the concerned Cashiers . In pursuance to the said dispute , Government of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi referred the said questioning whether action of management to recover loss suffered by it on account of fake currency notes accepted by the Cashiers in their duty hours is legal and justified?

(3) According to union, the recovery made regarding amount of fake currency notes accepted by the concerned Cashiers during the duty hours is not just and proper . It is rnot possible for Cashiers to trace out which are fake notes and which are genuine ones . No training was given to them. Tracing fake note is not possible by naked eye . Even common man cannot distinguish fake note from genuine rjote. Besides , there is work load during working hours and in that event, it is not possible for Cashiers to check each and every note and find it possible to declare either fake or genuine one .Besides , no knowledge was provided to them. Even instrument to detect fake note is not made available when those are to be accepted in working hours submitted by the costomers. All these difficulties were tried to bring to the notice ofthe management by the union . However no heedwas given to it and work ofCashier was going on the same infrastructure when there was no advance in technique in tracing such notes and documents which bank staff unable to cope up and distinguish its genuineness . So the action taken by management in recovering the amount of such fake notes accepted by the Cashiers during their working hours is nothing but punishing them by awarding recovery of amount of fake notes presuming that , they have made mistake which is not fair and proper . At the most it can be said as negligence and for that , management has proceeded against concerned workman. Without issuing chargesheet and without holding enquiry and observing such a workman guilty , management cannot pass such order of recovery of amount of fake notes. So it is submitted that , decision taken by first party of recovery of amount of fake notes is not just and proper and required to $top.

: 4. This is disputed by first party by filing reply at Ex- 10 quoting number ofjudgament of various courts in

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] each para of its contentions and submits that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction and subject matter involved in the reference cannot be called as an ' industrial dispute ' since it is individual one . Decision taken by first party of recovery ofamount towards the price offake notes is just and proper . According to first party, Cashiers are responsible for accepting such fake notes submitted by the customers. They were provided update knowledge and are equipped to distinguish how fake notes can be traced and detected . Even equipment of ultraviolet lights/ lamp is provided which help cashier to detect fake notes . Even training is given to them. It is sheer negligence of the Cashiers who are accepting such fake notes from the customers and are responsible to the loss of Bank. As Bank has to suffer for the amount of fake notes , instructions are given by circulating numbers of circulars to beware of fake notes and action of recovery of amount of such a fake note will be taken against concerned workman . Mangement tried to update the Cashiers by such circulars and trainings . However it is not noted by such Cashiers and, therefore , theymust be held responsible . So no interference required in the decision of the management who is simply recovering the amount ofsuch fake notes from the concerned Cashiers in whose bundles such fake notes are traced by Reserve Bank of India and reported by it .

5. In view of above pleadings issues are framed at Ex-33 which are answered against it as follows:

FINDINGS ISSUES

Yes 1. Whether dispute falls under Section 2 (k) of Industrial Disputes Act?

Yes 2. Whether Tribunal has jurisdiction over the subject- matter referred in the above reference?

Yes 3. Whether first party proves the negligence of second party?

4. Whether action taken of recovery of loss was done for negligence ofthe Cashier ?

5. What reliefworker entitled ?

Yes Does not arise 6. What order?

Asper order below.

REASON

IssueNo 1.

6. First party made out case that , subject- matter involved in the reference cannot be called as industrial dispute . According to first party, the pleading of the union is pertaining to single employee against whom action was taken and name of the employee is P.K. Meshram who was Head Cashier . When it is an individual dispute , it cannot [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

be called as industrial dispute . However, first party ignored that, union is fighting for the policy and decision taken by it against members of it of Cashier category making out case that , though on number of occasions union request management to give training to Cashiers , provide machinery to detect fake notes and reduce workload , was not considered by management at all . Infact it was a common problem which are faced by the Cashiers who are the members ofthe union . Since said dispute is common to all Cashiers it cannot be called as an individual dispute . Even I agree with this suggestion . Because it is not individual dispute. The pleading of second party is not up to the problem of individual Cashier but it was problem of Cashiers who are the members of the union . As per Section " 2 (k) of Industrial Disputes Act, any dispute or any difference which is connected with the employment can be called as an industrial dispute " . Here union raised dispute about not providing sufficient training and knowledge to the Cashiers to detect fake notes . The grievances of the union are that, update knowledge and hi - technique is not made available to the Cashiers to trace fake notes . It is also case ofthe union that, by naked eye one cannot trace out fake note easily. Since there is workload on Cashier , it is not possible for them to give sufficient time to each note to trace out whether it is genuine or fake . When it is a common dispute which is applicable to all Cashiers , in my considered view, dispute required to be treated as an ' industrial dispute' . So I answer this issue to that effect .

Issue No. 2:

7. Management has contended that , this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain this reference since it is not an ' industrial dispute ' and union has no sufficient members to raise such dispute . According to me on such a ground, management cannot prevent union to raise such a dispute . That objection ought to have raised by management before Conciliation Officer . When Conciliation Officer thinks it fit that union has sufficient representation and there is substance in the grievances , tried to settle it and when unable to settle it , submitted failure report on which appropriate Government . i.e. , Government of India, Ministry ofLabour sent this dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal presuming this Tribunal has jurisdiction over the subject- matter . Besides , dispute is sent by the appropriate Government. When dispute is sent by the appropriate Government to this Tribunal and when Conciliation Officer treats it as an ' industrial dispute ' and union has sufficient strength to pursue and espouse the dispute , in my considered view, management cannot object jurisdiction of this Tribunal on that count. So I answer this issue to thateffect.

Issue Nos . 3 & 4 :

8. It is case of first party that, due to negligence of the concerned workmen, fake notes are accepted by them . Those were traced by the Reserve Bank of India and Bank has to replace genuine notes against the fake notes and

385

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

has to suffer the loss of amount of such replacement because of negligence of the concerned workmen.

9. It is matter of record that, number of fake notes are traced in the bundles accepted by the concerned workman Shri P.K.Meshram who signed on the slip fixed at the top ofeach bundle by passing remark ' checked and verified' . When there is remark ' checked and verified ' naturally one has to presume that notes were checked and verified. Still Reserve Bank of India found fake notes in the bundles checked by Meshram worth Rs . 17,500 which is not meagre amount. First party has no option but to recover the said amount. Besides that , management's contention is that , they have not taken any other action as it is not possible but decided to recover the amount of fake notes accepted by the cashiers while they were discharging their duties justto correct their action .

10. Case of the union is that, they are not provided with training to trace out fake notes . They have no sufficient time to check each note . Even they are not facilitated with hi -technique to trace out fake notes easily. Even witness examined by Bank at Ex - 38 has admitted that, training was provided but after the incident was over . This witness unable to state whether ultraviolet lamps were provided to each branch to detect fake notes . He unable to point out . what training is given to Cashiers in tracing out fake notes. Even he admits that , said notes are not taken by the concerned Cashier directly from the customers . Even he admits no enquiry was conducted and no opportunity was given to the concerned workman. Even it is admitted position that , no charge sheet was served . Still action of recovery of amount of fake notes was taken. In the same line , concerned workman made out case that , they have no . sufficient time and one unable to trace out fake notes easily.

11. So this is the position in which scenario concerned workmen are working as Cashiers. Still one must note that they are the masters at their place ofwork . If at all they are having workload, they may ask customers to wait and unless and until they complete their work which is attheir hand, they are not supposed to see other customer. In my considered view workload cannot be excuse to accept fake notes under pretext of workload or of hurry . Besides one has to note that, every day they are handling such notes . One may presume that , such a Cashier definitely may be having extra knowledge than other common persons about currency notes . When person like that is working on that post only and doing that work only then , some extra and special attempts are expected from such employee . He cannot compare with common people in respect ofknowledge of fake note . One can be aware about such notes even by reading in newspapers or even by seeing news . Here person involved is working as Cashier and he is giving number of excuses including excuse of lack of training , lack of technique and lack of availability of modern instruments to trace cut fake notes has no meaning.

386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/ MAGHA 6 , 1929

It is also matter of record that , no charge sheet was served and no enquiry was conducted and still recovery is made of amount of fake notes . In my considered view, said decision of recovery is only taken about fake notes traced in the bundle of concerned workman , cannot be treated as punishment to them . Even it cannot be treated as misconduct for which chargesheet is required and enquiry must . Here negligence is levelled against concerned workman means that he was not having proper concentration inwork and his work was not only to accept the currency notes mechanically , but to check it and verify it. When he was asked to do that work of checking and verifying notes, he was supposed to do it . It was not that, he was supposed to check number of bundles in a day . As a cashier , he is supposed to check and verify the notes which were handled during that work which can be done byhim with proper care and with utmost caution. But here the result is that , he did not do it and has to face the recovery of amount of the fake notes . According to me , definitely it is negligence at the hands of concerned workman and if amount of said fake note is only recovered nothing wrong is done by management . Otherwise question arises , who will be held responsible for it and who will pay that amount? According to me, decision taken of recovering of amount of fake note , is just and proper . Besides it is to be noted that Bank is a custodian of money ofthePeople. People have trust with the Bank and on that trust they are keeping their money with Bank . If such employee is let to work as per their ideas and behaviour and with lethargy in duty, then who will be responsible for such a event ? $ o according to me decision taken by first party in recovering of amount of fake notes cannot be interfered, otherwise it will give very bad signal to others . So I conclude that , action taken by the Bank for recovery of such amountdoes not require charge sheet and conduct an enquiry as it is not a punishment.

IssueNo. 5:

12. Union prays to direct Bank to stop such recovery. However, I observe Bank is a custodian of public money and people have trust on Bank and with that trust , they are depositing money in the Bank. It is public money . If such fake notes are introduced in the Bank, then except concerned workman who can be held responsible ? According to me in such a scenario , workman involved in this reference like cashier P.K. Meshram , facing recovery on accepting fake 'notes, is not entitled for any relief. If such a view is checked by any interference , it will give very bad signal .

13. In view of discussions made above , I conclude that reference require to reject as it has no force in it . Hence the order:

ORDER

Reference is rejected with no order as to cost .

Dated: 15-11-2007

A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 186.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रंबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , पटना के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 5 ( C) /2005 को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल. - 12012/15/2005- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2008

S.O. 186. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 5 ( C)/2005 of the Industrial Tribunal , Patna (Bihar) as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Bank of India, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 31-12-2007 .

[No. L- 12012/15/2005 - IR(B - II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, SHRAM BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD , PATNA.

Reference Case No. 5(C) of 2005.

Between the Management of Central Bank of India , Zonal Office , Pawapuri Vihar , Bhagwanpur Chowk , Muzaffarpur and their workman Shri Rajan Kumar Tripathi @Ranjan Kumar Tripathi , S/o Shri Girja Kishore Tripathi , Vill . Karanpura, P.O. Chhapra , P.S. Kanti , District . Muzaffarpur (Bihar) .

For the Management : For the Workman PRESENT:

Shri Rajiv Ranjan Prasad , Advocate . : Shri Jai Prakash Verma, Advocate . Vasudeo Ram , Presiding Officer , Industrial Tribunal , Patna .

AWARD

Patna Dated the 18th December , 2007 By adjudication Order No. L- 12012/ 15/2005 - IR(B - II ) dated 27-5-2005 the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour under Clause (d) of Sub-Section( 1 ) and Sub - Section (2 - A ) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (hereinafter called ' the Act ' for brevity) has referred the following dispute between the management of Central Bank of India, Zonal Office , Pawapuri Vihar , Bhagwanpur Chowk, Muzaffarpur and their workman Shri Rajan Kumar Tripathi aliasRanjan Kumar Tripathi to this Tribunal for adjudication on the following .

"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India, Muzaffarpur in terminating the services ofShri Rajan Tripathi @ Shri Ranjan Kumar Tripathi islegal andjustified ? Ifnot, to what relief the above workman is entitled ? " [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2. The parties appeared on notice and filed written statements . The case of the workman is that he was engaged inthemonth ofSeptember , 1999 as Sub- Staffby the Senior Manager , Central Bank of India , Aam Gola Branch, Muzaffarpur as casual worker @ Rs . 35/- per day and thereafter it was enhanced to Rs. 40/- per day. Other two persons namely Vijay Kumar and Suresh Rajak were also engaged by the Senior Manager keeping in view the necessity of work . The workman used to be paid through the Head Peon of the Branch who used to receive the amount and disburse among the sub - staff. On 13-9-2001 a general guide line was issued by the Regional Manager to all Branch Manager and information regarding engagement oftemporaryworker who already completed 240 days within a period of 12 months was sought for . In the light of the said letter the Senior Manager , Aam Gola Branch sent the names of Vijay Kumar , Suresh Rajak and the present workman Ranjan Kumar Tripathi and recommended that their names be included for regularisation . The present workman was working continuously as sub - staff'on casual basis without any break upto full satisfaction of the authorities concerned . The authorities all of sudden stopped taking work from him from 27-1-2004 without complying the provision of Section 25F or 25 (N) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The workman contends that the termination of his services after working continuously for fouryears under the Senior Manager, Aam GolaBranch, Muzaffarpur is illegal and unjustified. He is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages alongwith interest .

3. The contention of the management is that the management never took the workman in service on regular basis . Aam Gola Branch of the management engaged the concerned workman only intermittently on casual basis as par exigencies of work. The Branch Manager of Central Bank of India has no authority to appoint a sub - staff nor the engagement of Shri Ranjan Tripathi was made through the prescribed process . Shri Ranjan Tripathi was also not eligible for appiontment as sub - staff. Shri Ranjan Tripathi never worked for 240 days regularly in a calendar year and as such there was no relationship ofemployer and employee between the management and the said workman and under the circumstances the management had no obligation to give retrenchment notice or notice pay or compensation . Under the circumstances , the management contended that the claim made by the workman is not fit to be allowed and the reference is fit to be answered in favour of the management .

4.Upon the pleadings of the parties and keeping in view the terms of reference the following points arise out fordecision: -

(i) Whether there was relationship of Employer and Employeebetween the management of Central Bank of India and Shri Ranjan Tripathi, the workman?

(ii) Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India , Muzaffarpur in terminating the

387

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

services of- Rajan Tripathi alias Ranjan Kumar Tripathi is legal and justified?

(iii)What reliefor reliefs, ifany, the workman is entitled to?

Findings

Point Nos . ( i) & (ii) :

5. Since both the points are co- related both the points have been taken together for discussion for convenience sake . Both the parties have adduced oral as well as documentary evidence in support oftheir respective contentions . The management has examined two witnesses namely Rajbanshi Yadav (M.W.1 . ) Chief Manager ofUttar Bihar Kshetriya Gramin Bank who remained posted in Central Bank of India, Aam Gola Branch as Senior Manager from May, 2001 to Aprill , 2003 and Shashi Bhushan Prasad (M.W.2) Senior Manager, Central Bank of India, Aam Gola Branch. The workman Rajan Tripathi has exmine himselfas W.W.1 and has examined two withneses , Umesh Kumar Singh (W. W.2) and Lalan Ojha (W. W.3) . The management has got exhibited photo copies of Circulars dated 20-9-93 (Ext.M), 1-12-93(Ext.M./1) dated 12-3-91 (Ext . M/2) while the workman has got exihibited photo copies o finformation Letter No. 82 dated 29-9-2001 (Ext . W) and the photo copy ofletter dated 13-9-2001 (Ext . W/1 ) .

6. The management's withnesses have stated that Rajan Tripathi was never appointed in the Bank. He was not even the temporary employee . The management witnesses have further stated that there are Rules of appointment in the Bank even as temporary employee and the said curculars are Ext. M to M/2 filed on behalf of the management. The Senior Manager of the Bank is not empowered to make even temporary appointment . M. W.1 hasadmittedthat workman Rajan Tripathi worked as casual labour occasionally but not 240 days continuosly in a calendar year . As against that the workman has stated that he was appointed in Sept. , 1999 as daily labourer on the post of sub- staff peon by the Senior Manager of Central Bank of India, Aam Gola, Muzaffarpur Branch and used to be paid@ Rs . 35 /- per day and subsequently @ Rs . 40/- perday. The payment used to be made in cash by the Head Peon of the Branch who used to take money and disbursed among sub - staff. The workman witnesses No. 2 and 3 who are the Account Holders of that Bank have stated that they had seen Rajan Tripathi working in that Branch of Central Bank of India. The workman has stated that he was removed from the services on 27-1-2004 .

7. The contention of the management, already mentioned above , in short, is that the engagement of the workman was neither done in accordance with the prescribed procedure nor by the person authorised to do so . Hence the initial appointment/ engagement of the workman was illegal and invalid. The workman did not work for 240 days continuously within the period of 12 calendar months and hence , accordingly to the management , there 388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/MAGHA 6 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] is no relationship of employer and employee between the parties and under the circumstances the provisions of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has no application in this case . The management has cited the decision reported in 2007 AIR-SCW -6529 in support of its contention that the burden of proof is on the workman to show that he put in 240 days continuous service within 12 calendar months preceding retrenchent .

8. The decision reported in PLJR - 1994 (2) --249 has been dited on behalf on workman in which it has been held

"Termination of service of workman working as TreasureGuard without giving one month's pay in lieu of one month's notice or any retrenchment compeneation- Labour- Courtrecording a finding that initial appointment was illegal and in valid and thereafter committing a serious error of law in proceeding on the assumption that the initial appointment being illegal and invalid , the provisions or Section 25F were not applicable - such on assumption is unwarranted and unsustainable in the eye of law- termination of employment on ground of appointment being illegal will itself qualify as retrenchment within the meating ofSeciton 2( do ) of the Industrial Disputes Act. "

in reply of letter dated 13-9-2001 ( Ext . W/ 1 ) of Regional Manager . It is worth mentioning here that Raj Banshi Yadava ( M. W.1 ) while posted as Senior Manager in Aam Gola , Muzaffarpur Branch had sent the letter dated 29-9-2001 (Ext . W) to Regional Office. Letter (Ext. W) speaks a lot . It speaks that it was felt necessary to run the Branch smoothly to engage three casual workers and hence three persons including Shri Rajan Kumar Tripathi were engaged by the Senior Manager , this workman Shri Rajan Tripathi or Shri Rajan Kumar Tripathi was engaged on regular basis since Sept. , 1999. It has been mentioned in the letter by the Senior Manager that these casual workers are very helpful insmooth running of the branch. Their services were also taken on holidays at the time of either closing and at the time when branch was getting ready for computerisation . The Senior Manager further mentioned in his letter dated 29-9-2001 that " Looking to their sincerety and exposure to the various banking departments, we recmend that their names should be included for regularisation ofjob if bank considers for the same, under their rule . " That simply proves that the workman was working in the said branch since September, 1999 on regular basis even on holidays . There can be no better proof than this letter of the Senior Manager that the workman put in 240 days continuous service as sub - staff. I am conscious of the fact that it is the duty of the workman and the onus lies on him to prove in order to attract the provisions laid down under Section 25 - F of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 that the workman put in 240 days continuous service as defined under Section 25 - B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . Thatstands proved from the letter dated 29-9-2001 of the Senior Manager of the Branch and the onus of the workman to prove that he put in 240 days continuous service stood discharged. When once the bonus of the workman stood discharged the bonus lies on the management to disprove the same or to prove that the workman was not in continuous service of the Bank or there was break in his service prior to removal from service on 27-1-2004 . The management has failed to prove the same and under the circumstances I find that the workman put in 240 days continuous service prior to removal from the service .

In the above quoted decision it has been observed that the idea of invalid appointment is quite foreign to the Scheme of the Industrial Disputes Act . Section 2(s) of the Act which defines ' workman ' does not have any such distinction and the definition is couched in the widest term . Any person including an apprentice doing any manual unskilled , skilled , technical , operational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward would qualify as a workman not with standing whether the contract of employment was express or in plied. Once having qualified as a workman all that is required for the applicaiton of Section 25 - F is that the concerned workman should have been in continuous service for 240 days in a calendar year. In fact the termination of employment of a workman on the ground that his initial appointment was not legal and valid itself qualify as retrenchment within the meaning of Section 2(00) as termination for illegal and invalid appointment has not been made an exception to the definition of retrenchment .!

9. There is no dispute on the point rather it is an admitted fact that Shri Rajan Tripathi worked under the management of the Bank and for that he used to be paid . Hence there can be no dispute on the point that Shri Rajan Tripathi was a workman under the management ofCentral Bank of India . The workman has filed the copy of letter No. 2201 dated 13-9-2001 of the Regional Manager (Ext . W/1) through which the management cought for information from all Branch Managers regarding temporary workers who worked for 240 days continuously in a calendar year . The workman has also filed the copy of letter dated 29-9-2001 of Senior Manager , Central Bank of India, Aam GolaBranch to Regional Office , Muzaffarpur (Ext . W) sent

10. From the above discussions it is clear that the workman put in 240 days continuous service as sub - staff for several years prior to his removal from the service . That simply proves that Shri Rajan Tripathi , the workman was retrenched from service .There is no dispute on the point rather it is an admitted fact that the workman has not been paid notice pay is lieu of notice of retrenchment or retrenchement compensation. Under the circumstances I find that the retrenchment of Shri Rajan Tripathi was not only illegal it is unjustified also. From the above discussions I find andhold that there was relationship of employer and employee between the management of Central Bank of India and Shri Rajan Tripathi and the action of the management of Central Bank of India , Muzaffarpur in terminating the services ofRajan Tripathi @ Rajan Kumar Tripathi is illegal 389 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929

C. R. No. 34/2005

and unjustified. There two points are decided accordingly.

II Party

Point No. ( iii) :

thanh vàng về nhà

Partyst

The Dy. General Manager, Indian Banko mode 4th Floor, East Wing, Raheja Towers 26-27 M.G. Road

The General Secretary, Indian Bank Employee Union, C/ o Indian Bank, 10.K.G.Road, Bangalore-560.009

we the they no l Bangalore ,

11. Since the termination of services of workman RajanTripathi was made on contravention of the provision under Section 25F of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947, the termination is non-est in the eyes of law. Under the circumstances the workman is entitled to be reinstated as sub-staff, peon in the Central Bank of India. The workman was not doing a work ofspecialised nature so that he might nothave get engagement during the period of retrenchment . Under the circumstances I find that the claim ofbackwages isnot fit to be allowed. This point is decided accordingly.

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredby clause (d) of sub- section 2A ofthe Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide orderNo. L- 12011 /68/2005- IR (B- II ) dated 9th August, 2005 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Indian Bank is jüstified

having imposed the punishment of reduction oftwo increments on Shri B. Siddaiah, sub -staff w.of. 6-4-1999 ? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to and from which alten , duy 12. In the result I find and hold that the action of the management of Central Bank of India, Muzaffarpur in terminating the services ofShri Rajan Tripathi @ Shri Rajan Kumar Tripathi is illegal and unjustified ? I also find and hold that the said workman is entitled to be reinstated in service as peon in subordinate cadre of the Bank, The mangement of Central Bank of India, Muzaffarpur is directed to reinstate the workma accordingly within two months from the date of publication of award...

13. And this is my award

VASUDEO RAM, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 2 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 187. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947

(1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बौच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 34/2005) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था

[से. एल -12011 / 68 /2005 - आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2008

S.O. 187. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 34/2005 ) of theCentral Government Indus . Tribunal - curn -Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian Bank of India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 2-1-2008 .

[No. L- 12011 /68 /2005 - IR(B - II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, DeskOfficer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT .

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated: 5th December,2007

PRESENT

2. The case of the first party union espousing the cause of the first party workman as made out in the Claim Statement , in brief, is that the workman having joined the services ofthe management bank as a sub staff in the year 1972 inaintained his flawless record ofservice throughout . He was placed under suspension vide order dated 14-12-1991 on the allegations that he had stolen two blank demand drafts from she stock of new DDs without permission taking the same with the help of cupboard keys from the concerned officer's table and handed over those DDs to outside parties for forging the same with an intention to encash and obtain the money, fraudulently. Simultaneously a complaint was given to the police and a criminal case No. 505/91 was registered against him. He denied the allegations by way ofreply dated 13-1-1992 and was kepyunder suspension without holding enquiry w.e.f. 14-12-1991 . He approached the Hon'ble High Court challenging the above said suspresion order and under the orders of the Hon'ble High Court, he was reinstated in service w.e. f. 6-4-1999; that the management conducted a departmental enquiry with reference to the charge sheet dated 22-8-1998 which was in continuation of the earlier charge sheet cum-suspension order dated 14-12-1991 . Therefore, he contended that the departmental enquiry conducted against him after a long delay and without giving him sufficient and reasonable opportunity to defend himself was bad in law. He also challenged the enquiry findings as unjust and unreasonable and perverse. He contended that the above said criminal prosecution launched against him ended in his acquittal by order dated 26-7-2002 passed by the 3rd Addditional Chief Judicial Magistrate , Mysore. Therefore, the charges involving the departmental enquiry and involved under the cirminal proceedings being one and the same , he moved the Appellate Authority on Shri A, R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer

146 G1/ 2008-8 390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/MAGHA 6 , 1929

2-12-2002 to set aside the punishment order in the light of the criminal court judgment acquitting him for the charges ofmisconductwhich misconduct was subject matter ofthe charge sheetunder the departmental enquiry proceedings . Therefore, in a nutshell the first party workman not only challenged the enquiry proceedings as unjust and unreasonable but also challenged the enquiry findings as suffering from perversity and the order of punishment passed against him on the basis of those findings as illegal and unjust and requested this tribunal to set aside the said punishment order with all consequential benefits .

3.The management by its counter statement , while, contending that the first party having been retired from service and having not signed the claim statement, the present reference is liable to be rejected on this count itself. It contended that the reference is also liable to be rejected as the dispute was raised after a gap of about 7 years from the date of the punishment. The management contended that as per the charge sheet dated 14-12-1991 issued against the first party, he committed theft of two DDs in collusion with other two outsiders and presented them with the State ExciseCommissioner's Office for a sum ofRs . 50 lakhs and therefore, this being the act prejudicial to the interest of the bank, a Domestic Enquiry was conducted against the firstpartyinaccordeance with the Bipartite Settlement terms and on the basis of the enquiry findings holding him guilty ofthe charges, the aforesaid punishment of reducing two increments of the first party was rightly imposed by the management . Therefore, the management contended that proceedings of the enquiry were conducted giving sufficient opportunity to the first party in accordance with the principles ofnatural justice and it is on the basis ofthe enquiry findings , the first party was rightly punished . The management then contended that the acquittal of the first partyworkman in the criminal proceedings which was taken place after a gap of about 7 years will not come to his rescue in as much as proceedings in a criminal case and the proceedings in a DE are entirely different and the acquittal ina criminal case will not come in the way of the management while imposing the punishment for the acts of misconduct in the course of the employment . Therefore , the management requested this tribunal to reject the reference.

4. After the pleadings were completed, the matter came to be posted for framing of any issue in the light of the contentions taken by the parties . In the meanwhile , the first party was reported to be dead on 25-8-2006 and the application being moved by his LRs , it was allowed and theywere ordered to be brought on record. Thereupon , the case came to be posted for evidence of the management and came to be adjourned from time to time to report the settlement as requested by the learned counsel appearing for theparties .However , on 29-10-2007 learned counsel for the first party workman requested this tribunal to pass necessary orders on the basis of the very pleadings of the parties without going into the question of validity or

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] otherwise of the enquiry prceedings and without going into the point raised by the first party about the perversity of the enquiry findings . His only request was that the punishment imposed upon the first party reducing his two increments was notjustified and called for as undisputedly there was no loss caused to the bank assuming for a moment thatthe first party had committed the theft of two DDs as alleged in the charge sheet . He also submitted to set aside the punishment order for the reason that on the very set of facts, charges and evidence the first party workman has been acquitted by the competent criminal court and therefore, findings of the enquiry officer in holding the workman guilty of the charges cannot be sustained in the eye of law in the light of the criminal court judgement and accordingly, the punishment order is liable to be quashed.

5. Whereas, learned counsel for the management by way ofhis reply submitted that the act of theft of 2 DDs by the first party cannot be taken to be minor misconduct as incase those demand drafts presented for a sum of Rs . 50 lakhs and were encashed , a huge loss would have been caused to the bank. As far as the criminal court judgement isconcerned , the learned counsel submitted that the first party was imposed with the impugned punishment as far back as in the year 1999 and whereas , it is in the year 2002 the criminal court verdict came out and therefore , the first party workman cannot be given any advantage of the above said judgment by the criminal court. Therefore , he submitted that having regard to the fact that the very serious charge of misconduct have been proved against the first party, the punishment impugned cannot be said to be grave in nature to be interfered at the hands of this tribunal..

6.Keeping in view the submission made on behalfof the first party workman that he is not going to challenge the enquiry proceedings or the enquiry findings holding him guilty ofthe charge of misconduct levelled in the charge sheet, now this court has to proceed to consider the other question of facts and law raised by the parties so as to sustain the impugned punishment imposed upon the first party. The fact that the first party has been acquitted after duetrial ofthe very charges of misconduct leveled against him in the criminal prosecution has not been disputed by the management . The only contention raised for the management in this regard is that this acquittal order being passsed somewhere in the year 2002 after a gap of about 3 years from the date of impugned punishment order will not come to the rescue of the first party and that in the light of the criminal court judgement findings of the enquiry officer holding him guilty of the charges cannot be set aside . Therefore, the above said fact of criminal prosecution being launched against the first party by the management bank itself and having been ended in honourable acquittal of the first party for the very same charges of misconduct based on identical facts and evidence , I find substance in the arguments advanced for the first party that findings of 391 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

the enquiry officer holding him guilty ofthe charges cannot

be sustained. Their Lordship of Supreme Court under the

judgment of the criminal court .As seen above , the impugned punishment order was passed against the first party on 6-4-1999 and whereas he was acquitted from the criminal courtbyjudgment dated 26-7-2002 . As has come on record the first party has been retired from service somewhere in the month of June 2005 and whereas , he expired on 25-8-2006. Their Lordship of Supreme Court while granting the reliefat para 33 of the decision, have made it abundantly clear that the punishment order passed by the Disciplinary Authority against the delinquent cannot be found fault with till thejudgment was rendered by the criminal court in acquitting the delinquent. Therefore , applying the same principle in the instant case also , the impugned punishment order passed against the first party cannot be said to be bad in lawuntil the acquittal order was passed against him. Inthe result for the period in between the date of impugned punishment order and the date of acquittal order , no relief as such canbe granted in favour of the first party workman and the order passed bythe disciplinary authority imposing the impugned punishment shall be taken in force during the above said period i.e.during the period between the date of punishment order and the date of the acquittal order. However, the punishment order cannot be sustained and is liable to be set aside w.e.f. from the date of the acquittal order was passed. Hence the following award:

AWARD

The impugned punishment order is held to be legal and valid up till 25-7-2002 and is ordered to be set aside w.e.f. 26-7-2002 , the date on which criminal court judgment came to be passed against the first party workman . The LRs ofthe first party workman shali be reimbursed with the loss caused to the first party workman by reducing his two increments w.e.f. 26-7-2002 till June 2005, the date on which he retired from the service . The amount due to the first partyworkman shall be paid to his LRs after verifying their credentials within a period of 3 months from the date of publication ofthis award, failing which it shall carry interest at the rate of 10 per cent per annum till its realisation. No. costs.

similar facts and circumstances of the case in a decision reported in A2006 AIR SCW 2709 -GM Tank Vs. State of Gujarat & Anr . at para 31 laid down the principle as under:- "The judgments relied on by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents are distinguishable on facts and on law. In this case the departmental proceedings and the criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts and the charge in a departmental case against the appellant and the charge before the criminal court are one and same . It is true that the nature ofthe charge in the departmental proceedings and in the criminal case is grave . The nature ofthe case launched against the appellant on the basis of evidence and material collected against him during enquiry and investigation and as reflected in the charge sheet, factors mentioned are one and the same. In other works , charges evidence witnesses and circumstances are one and the same. In the present case , criminal and departmental proceedings have already noticed or granted on the same set of facts namely, raid conducted at the appellant's residence , recovery of articles there from . The investigating officer Mr. V. B. Raval and other departmental witnesses were the only witnesses examined by the enquiry officer who by relying upon their statement came to the conclusion that the charges were established against the appellant . The same witnesses were examined in the criminal case and the criminal court on the examination came to the conclusion that the prosecution has not proved the guilt alleged against the appellant beyond any reasonable doubt and acquitted the appellant by his judicial pronouncement with the finding that the charge has not been proved . It is also to be noticed thejudicial pronouncement was made after a regular trial and on hot contest. Under these circumstances , it would be unjust and unfair and rather oppressive to allow the findings recorded in the departmental proceedings to stand. "

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 5th December 2007) A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 188.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 74/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011 / 138/2001- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी 7. Therefore, in the light of the principle laid downby their Lordship of Supreme Court which apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case , the findings of the enquiry officer holding the workman guilty of the charges in the light ofthe above said criminal courtjudgment cannot be sustained in the eye of law. As in the said case, in the present case also the judgment of the said criminal court was after a regular trial and it is not the case of the management that it was not contested hotly. Therefore, as observedby their Lordship , it would unjust and unfair and rather oppressive to allow the findings of the enquiry officer recorded in the departmental proceedings to stand. As in the aforesaid case , in the present case also there has been a very long gap between the order of punishment and the :

392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008 /MAGHA 6,1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

NewDelhi, the 2nd January,2008

S.C. 188. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 74/2001 ) of the Cent Govt . Indus . Tribunal-cum - Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial disputebetweenthe management of Indian Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 02-01-2008:

[No. L- 12011 / 138/2001 - IR(B - II)]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURL BANGALORE

Dated: 7th December 2007

PRESENT

SHRI A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer

C. R. No. 74/2001

IPARTY

Shri D.N. Shivannavar,

C/ o.General Secretary ,

Dharwad District Bank Empls . Asson,

No.9, Corporation Bank,

case No. 97/93 filed at the instance of the management before the Additional Civil Judge , Junior Division and 2nd Additional JMFC, Ranebennur, on the allegation that he committed theft of current account cheque book from the custody of the bank and issued two cheques for a sum of Rs.5000 &Rs.6000 on 14-10-1991 & 22-10-1991 respectively hasbeendisposed ofby the said court byjudgement dated 29-01-2001 and the first party has been acquitted honourably. It is his case that thereafter he submitted a representation dated: 17-02-2001 to the management for his reinstatement with all benefits . But the management through its letter dated 22-03-2001 has refused to consider his request without quoting any reason . Thereupon , he raised the dispute before the ALC( Central) , Ministry of Labour, Hubli which resulted into the present proceedings . Therefore, the first party submitted that termination of his services by the management on the grounds of theft of cheque leaves is illegal and unjustified particularly, in the light of the aforesaid criminal court judgement acquitting him for the very same offence/ misconduct alleged against him. It is also his case that the termination was bad in law as he worked under the management continuously for 240 days and more from June 1989 till his services were terminated w.e.f. 13-11-1991 . Therefore , he requested this tribunal to pass an award by setting aside the termination order with reinstatement, full back wages , continuity of service and other consequential benefits including regularisation of his services..

Broadway, HUBLI- 580020

IPARTY

The Regional Manager ,

Indian Bank, Regional Office,

SujathaComplex,

P.B. Board, HUBLI -580029

AWARD

11. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredbyclause ( d) of sub-section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12011 / 138/2001 - IR(B- II) dated 5th October , 2001 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of Indian bank in terminating the services of Shri D.N. Shivannavar w.e.f. 13-11-1991 on the grounds oftheft of cheque leaves is legal and justified? Ifnot, what reliefthe workman isentitled to?"

3. The management by its counter statement however, contended that the first party was engaged as a casual temporary peon on day today and daily wages basis not being appointed by the competent authority for appointment of sub staff followed by established selection process for implementation of temporary sub staff and therefore , his engagement was not legal and proper and he cannot claim any sort of relief against the management . The management contended that the first party was not engaged for 240 days in any calendar year . The management then contended that while the first party was working in the said Ranebennur branch had stolen a current account cheque book consisting of 25 leaves from the custody of the bank and issued two cheques out of those stolen leaves for Rs.5000 - on 14-10-1991 and for Rs.6000 on 22-10-1991 to the credit of a fictitious saving bank account openedby him in the name of one Shri Chandrappa B Patil with KCC bank and this fact came to the knowledge of the bank when those cheques came to the branch for encashment purpose; that on an enquiry with the first party about the said two cheques , he confessed to have destroyed them and admitted the guilt and gave a confession statement in that respect ; that the procedure for taking disciplinary action contemplated in awards and Bipartite Settlements governing the service conditions of the award staff is applicable to only the permanent staff of the bank and notto temporary /casual employees . However, 1 2. The case of the first party workman as made out inthe claim statement in brief, is that he being selected for the post of temporary sub staff at Ranebennur branch through their letter dated 28-06-1989 , served the management bank as a temporary peon (Sepoy ) from June 1989 sincerely and honestly up till 13-11-1991 and has been refused work by the management illegally without any notice or payment of compensation amount ; that a criminal [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

the matter was enquired by an officer from erstwhile Regional Office , Hubli and he submitted his report dated 29-10-1991 pointing the fingers towards the first party. The first partywas given an opportunity to explain his position and he admitted the guilt, gave his confession statement and therefore, the services of the first party were rightly disengaged by letter dated 13-11-1991 ; the management contended that as held by the Apex Court, the proceedings before the criminal court and that initiated by the institution are based on two different ideologies and therefore , the first party cannot claim any advantage of his acquittal by the criminal court . The management further contended that the first partywas initially engaged on 3-7-1989 as a casual worker and continued to be engaged up till October 1991 and was not engaged for 240 days in any period of 12 months and that he has not been selected through the established selection process and therefore, he has got no right to claim any relief against the management .. 4.During the course of trial the management examined two witnesses as MW 1 &2 and got marked two documents in the statement of MW2 as Ex.M1 &M2 . The statement of MWI in his examination chief was only to the effect that there is no practice or procedure to issue show cause notice or a charge sheet or to conduct any enquiry before the services of any casual worker are to be terminated/ discharged . In his cross examination it was elicited that he was not aware of the facts of the case nor he has seen the first party working in the bank . The statement of MW2 in his examination chief is to the effect that he is giving the evidence on the basis of the records and he identified the confession statement given by the first party at Ex.M1 and a letter dated 21-09-2000 received from Malaprabha Grameena Bank at Ex.M2 . In his cross examination it was elicited that he did not work at Ranibennur branch nor the first party worked under him and that he cannot say if Ex.M1 is not in the handwriting and the signature of the first party. It was also elicited that copy of the Ex.M2 was not served upon the first party .

5. The first party by way of his affidavit evidence, while, reiterating the aforesaid averments made in his claim statement added to say that by letter dated 17-05-1989 he was called upon to appear for interview for the post of temporary sub staff at the Ranebennur branch of the management along with necessary documents and he appeared for the said interview on 27-05-1989 . Thereupon, he was selected for the post of temporary sub staff at Ranebennur branch and was intimated accordingly vide letter dated 28-06-1989 . He further stated that he served the bank from June 1989; that as per the letter dated 22-08- 1990 the Regional Secretary, Indian Bank SC/ST Employees Welfare Association has disclosed that he (workman) worked for 236 days and therefore , deserved to work as sub staff and requested the management to regularize his services . He further stated that the Liason Officer , SC/ ST ofthe management's regional office Ernakulam through its

393

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26; 2008/माघ 6, 1929

letter dated 16-10-1990 addressed to the above said Regional Secretary has stated that the seniority of the first party is 26th chance in state wise seniority list and second chance as per district wise seniority for the purpose of regularisation his services . He stated that the branch manager in a performa of particulars of candidates on daily wages engaged for the quarter / month of October 1991 has stated that the first party worked for 334 days right from the initial appointment . He stated that to deny him the relief of regularisation of his services he was falsely implicated in a case of theft of the cheque book from the bank and a false complaint was also filed with the Police and thereupon, was not allowed to work from 13-11-1991 . He further stated that there was no charge sheet issued to him nor any enquiry was conducted nor any notice was issued to him much less paying retrenchment compensation while he was refused work by the management . He then stated about his acquittal by the criminal court in the criminal prosecution launched against him by the bank and his representation to the management to reinstate him in service in the light of his acquittal . In his further examination chief he got marked 11 documents at EX.Wt to W11 as under:

Ex. W 1- The Interview letter sent by Second party to first party.

Ex. W2- Appointment order issued by Second party .

Ex.W3- Letter issued by the Regional Secretary.

Ex.W4- Copy of Second Party Liason Officer letter.

Ex.W5- Copy of Daily Wages engaged proforma of Secondparty.

Ex.W6- Certified copy of witness of second party bank Manager. ::

Ex.W7- Certified copy ofwitness of KCC Bank Manager .

Ex.W.8- Certified copy ofjudgment in CC No.97/93 .

Ex.W9- Copy of the representation of first party with Regd. Post receipts and AD cards.

Ex.W10- Reply given by Second party.

Ex. Wil- Copy of the petition before the ALC ( Central ) Hubli.

6. Inhis cross examination it was elicited that he was attending the work of bank documents filing, vouchers bundling and handing over the ledgers to the clerical staff, taking them out of the cup-board and was also keeping them back in the cup- board. He admitted that there is a charge against him with regard to cheques of Rs . 5000 and Rs.6000 . When he was confronted with Ex.M1 he admitted the signature at Ex.M1 (a) as his signature but Ex. M1 (b ) is not his signature. He denied the suggestion that he worked atMalaprabhaGrameena Bank, Dharwad as per Ex.M2 . Не denied the suggestion that he was working as a casual worker and not as a temporary staff whenever the work was provided by the bank . In the last but one sentence in 394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26, 2008/MAGHA 6, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] hiscross examination he stated that every month he was working for 18 days .

7..Learned counsel for the management in his arguments justified the action of the management in terminating the services of the first party on the ground that he being a casual worker was involved in a case of theft of cheque book from the custody of the bank and admitted the guilt of committing the theft by giving his confession statement at Ex.M1 and therefore , it cannot be said that his termination was bad in law. He submitted that the first partybeing a casual worker/ temporary Peon, there was no necessity for the management to issue any charge sheet, any notice or pay any compensation amount as provided under the provisions of ID Act. He also contended that the criminal court judgement acquitting the first party from the charge of the theft is not relevant for the purpose of deciding the dispute in hand . He also submitted that the first party had been working with MalaprabhaGrameena Bank subsequent to the termination as evident from Ex.M2 . He contended that the order passed against the first party was a simple order of discharge without attaching any stigma and therefore , required no DomesticEnquiry.

8. Whereas , learned Union representative representing the case of the first party submitted his written arguments as well advanced his oral arguments . The gist ofhiswritten agreements is once again to the effect that the first party was in the service of the management continuously from June 1989 till 30-11-1989 on which date hisservices were terminated . He referred to the document at Ex. W3 to suggest that he worked for a period of 236 days as on 22-8-1990 and as per Ex. W5 he worked for 334 days prior to October 1991. Therefore , he contended that the first party worked continuously for a period of 240 days and more . He took the support of the statement ofthe firstparty in his cross examination that the first party worked withthe management for a minimum of 18 days in a month which statement was not denied by the management . He also referred to the criminal court judgment to falsify the allegation of the management that the first party was involved in a theft case and therefore . his termination was justified on the said ground. In support of his argument he relied upon the decision reported in 2002 SC cases 1010 and a decision reported in 1985 Lab IC 1733 .

9. Therefore , in the light of the pleadings ofthe parties and the points of dispute involved in the reference schedule , the questions to be considered would be:

(i) Whether the management was justified in terminating the services of the first party w.e.f. 13-11-1991 on the ground of theft of cheque leaves;

(ii) If so, whether the termination attracts the provisions of Section 2(00) read with section 25f of the ID Act .

10. Before adverting upon the aforesaid two questions at the very outset, it must be made clear that the claim put forth by the first party workman taking the contention that he is entitled for the relief of regularisation of his services , is out of the purview of the reference schedule point. This court is not supposed to travel beyond the points of dispute involved in the reference schedule and as could be read from the reference schedule this tribunal is supposed to record its finding only on the point as to whether the termination as such is justified or not . Therefore, the statement of the first party in his affidavit referring to the aforesaid documents at Ex.W3 where under he was shown to have worked for a period of 236 days as on 22-8-1990 and that he has been shown to have worked for a period of334 days prior to October 1991 as per Ex . W5 tojustify his claim for regularisation of his services is not germane to the points of dispute and therefore, cannot be considered as a claim justified for the purpose of regularisation of his services . Therefore , now the first and foremost point to be considered would be whether the management was justified in terminating the services of the first party workman on the aforesaid ground of theft . The fact that the first party has not been appointed as a Peon on permanent basis followed by established selection process is not to be disputed and cannot be disputed. The two documents namely Ex . W1 & W2 will not come to the rescue of the first party workman to suggest that he has been selected or appointed on regular basis to work as a sub staff. As per Ex. W1 dated 17-05-1989 the first party was called upon to appear for an interview to be held on 27-05-1989 for post of temporary sub staff at the Ranebennur branch of the management bank . It would appear that in response to the said interview call , the first party appeared for the interview and by letter dated 28-06-1989 ( at Ex .W2) he was informed that his name has been included in the live panel of temporary sub staff of the said branch . The aforesaid letter at Ex . W2 further would read to the effect that his engagement is purely on temporary basis and subject to the terms and conditions issued by the Central Office from time to time . Therefore , these two documents would make it abundantly clear that the selection of the first party for the post of temporary sub staff was not on permanent basis or on regular basis followed by established selection process . The letter dated 22-8-1990 filed before this tribunal along with Ex.W3 addressed to the Liason Officer SC/ ST management bank marked on behalf of the first party himself will read to the effect that the first party has completed his service of 236 days w.e.f. 3-7-1989 as a sub staff on the temporary sub staff panel of the bank. The letter at ExW4 written by the LiasonOfficer addressed to the Regional Secretary of the Employees Welfare Association in response to the above said two letters is just to suggest that as per the seniority position , the first party stands 26th chance State Seniority wise and Second Chance as per District seniority wise . Therefore , the aforesaid letters will not be coming to the 395

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

help ofthe first party workman to suggest that he has been working with the management bank on a regular basis being selected through established selection process on permanent basis . Merely because the name of the first party has been included in the live panel of temporary sub staff and deserved to be absorbed on permanent basis , it cannot be said thathe was working with the management bank on permanent basis before his services actually were absorbed keeping in view the State Seniority List or the District Seniority List maintained by the bank as per the panel . Therefore, when we proceed on the assumption that the first party's services being engaged by the management as a temporary peon on temporary basis , then , the management was right in contending that the services of the first party could have been dispensed with on the ground oftheft alleged or on any other ground . He being the temporary sub staff as was rightly argued for the management no regular charge sheet was required to be issued to him. followed by any regular DE which process is required only in the case of the permanent sub staff as per theterms ofBipartite Settlement . Therefore, the contention ofthe first party that his termination was bad in law or was against the principles of natural justice in the absence of any charge sheet or any DE holding him guilty of the charges of the above said theft is not tenable . As noted above , the services of the first party workman being engaged on temporary basis could have been dispensed with by the management on any ground much less on the ground of theft. Infact , in this case there is evidence brought on record to suggest that when the first party was interrogated and was enquired about the aforesaid theft of cheque leaves by the officer of the bank, he admitted the guilt by giving his confession statement marked before this tribunal at Ex.M1 . The first party though was aware of this document produced by the management uttered no single word denying the genuineness or authenticity of the said confession statement . On the other hand in his cross examination as noted above , he has admitted his signature at Ex.M1 ( a) at Ex.M1 . Therefore, for the purpose of discontinuing the services of the first party workman thisadmission on his part was very much sufficient to justify the action of the management terminating his services .

11. The criminal court judgment dated 29-01-2001 acquitting the first party workman for the aforesaid charge oftheft levelled against him is ofno avail to the first party, as first of all the perusal of the judgment would disclose that he has been acquitted giving the benefit of doubt and on the ground that the prosecution did not prove the guilt beyond all reasonable doubt . Moreover, as already noted above, the services of the first party could have been dispensed with en any ground much less on the ground of alleged theft or proof of the theft, he being a temporary worker.

provisions of Section 2( oo) read with Section ' 25F of the IDAct. In order to bring his case under the purview of the aforesaid two provisions , a heavy burden cast upon the shoulders of the first party to establish before this tribunal that he worked with the management continuously for a period of 240 days or more during 12 calendar months immediately preceding his termination . Their Lordship of Supreme Court in a decision reported in 2002 ILR 339 have laid down the proposition of law in very clear words to say thatit is for the claimant workman to lead evidence to show that he had infact worked for 240 days in the year preceding histermination. It was further held that mere filing of the affidavit cannot be recorded as a sufficient evidence for the said purpose. In the instant case again except by filing the affidavit the first party has not produced any iota of evidence to suggest that he worked with the management for a period of 240 days immediately preceding his termination. Infact from the very documents produced by the first party referred to supra at Ex .W3 & W5 it can be verywell gathered that he did not work for a period of240 days in 12 calendar months during the period in between June/ July 1989 and October/November 1991. From the perusal of the EX.W3 as noted above , it is revealed that the first party completed his service of 236 days as on 22-8-1990 starting from 3-7-1989 . Therefore , it is crystal clear from this document that between July 1989 andAugust 1990 the first party did not work for a period of 240 days . Now coming to the document at Ex . W5 , he is shown to have worked for a period of 334 days as on October 1991 , when the said performa giving particulars was prepared by the management branch concerned . If we act upon this document to show that the first party worked for a period of334 days as on October 1991 then it goes without saying that in between22-8-1990 and October 1991 the first party hardly worked for a period of 100 days . These two documents at Ex.W3 &W5 as noted above, have been produced by the first party himself and relied upon taking support ofhis claim. That apart, the first party in his cross examination in the last but one sentence as noted above has stated that he has worked every month for 18 days . Evenwe act upon this statement of first party which infact was taken support of by the learned Union Representative in his written arguments on the ground that it was not denied by the management , then , again the first party will not be in a position to fulfill the condition of 240 days in a particular calendar year. If we multiply this 18 days by 12 months , the figure would be 216 days . Therefore , from the very statement of the first party as well as the documents produced by him it gets clear that the first party has not worked with the management continuously for a period of 240 days in 12 calendar months immediately preceding his termination. In the result and for the reasons foregoing, this court has no hesitation in its mind to come to the conclusion that the first party did not work for a period of one year as contemplated under Section 25B of the ID Act

and therefore , the provisions of Section 2 (oo) read with 12. Now comes a question as to whether the termination otherwise was bad in law attracting the 396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/MAGHA 6 , 1929

Section 25F of the ID Act will not come into play. The decisions referred to supra cited on behalf of the first party will be applicable to the case only when the termination amounts to retrenchment and since in the instant case termination does not amount to retrenchment , principle laid down in the above said rulings will not apply to the present case. In the result, the reference deserves to be rejected. Hence the followingAward:

AWARD

The reference stands rejected. No costs .

(Dictated to the P. A. transcribed by her corrected and pronounced and signed by me on 7th December , 2007. )

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 2 जनवरी , 2008

का.. 189.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/273/1999- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी 1

NewDelhi , the 2nd January, 2008

S.O. 189. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 10/2000 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 02-01-2008

[No. L- 12012/273 / 1999 - IR(B - II) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INIDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT

BANGALORE

Dated : 18th December 2007

PRESENT

SHRI A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer C. R. No. 10/2000

IPARTY

Shri V.R. Sreenivasan, Rameswara Estate, Agnivillage, Hanasalu P. O. , Sakaleshpura Taluq- 577119 Karnataka State.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] IPARTY

The Zonal Manager, Indian Bank , 4th Floor, Eastwing, Raheja Towers , M.G. Road , Bangalore.

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredby clause (d) ofsub - section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/273 / 1999 - IR(B- II) dated 2nd February 2000 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the claim of Shri V.R. Sreenivasan former Clerk, Indian Bank for payment of terminal benefits under voluntary retirement scheme w.e.f. 15-05-1994 isjustified? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to?" :

The case of the first party workman , as made out , in the Claim Statement, relevant for the purpose in brief, is that as per the terms of the settlement dated 29-10-1993 signed between Indian Bank's Association , Mumbai and Indian National Bank Employees Federation which is binding on both the parties , he opted for voluntary retirement by issuing a notice dated 15-05-1994 to the competent authority and received a letter dated 02-07-1994 issued by the incompetent Authority namely, the Manager , Indian Bank, NTY Layout branch , Bangalore stating that the voluntary retirement scheme is not in force in their bank and as such the central office wants to know whether his letter/ notice be treated as a letter of resignation ; thatthe competent authority namely, the Second Party did not . communicate its decision not to accept the voluntary retirement of the first party before the expiry of notice period of3 months from 15-05-1994 and therefore , his voluntary retirement became effective from 15-08-1994 as per Clause 29(1 ) & (2) of the said settlement; that as per circular dated 16-06-1994 and 23-11-1995 , there was introduction of pension in the bank and as per clause 29 ( 1) of the Settlement, voluntary retirement can be availed by the employees on or after 1-11-1993 . Therefore , in pursuance of the deemed voluntary retirement and the subsistence of the said schemejas on 15-05-1994, he submitted his claim for terminal benefits viz. PF, Gratuity and Pension to the competent authority on 29-08-1994 but received a letter dated 12-10-1994 stating that he is not entitled to Pension, PF, Gratuity etc ; that the first party claiming the above said benefits , filed an application before this tribunal registered as CGA 08/94 but it came to be dismissed by order dated 5-10-1998 on the ground of lack ofjurisdiction; that in July 1999 two other incompetent authorities issued letters dated 3-07-1999 and 12-07-1999 treating the notice of the first party seeking Voluntary Retirement as resignation . Therefore, he raised the dispute before the RLC , Bangalore resulting in to the present [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

proceedings ; that the second party being the competent authority has not rejected the notice of voluntary retirement ofthe first party at any given time even today. Infact, it should have rejected the same well within the notice period of3 months ie. 15-08-1994 , nor any disciplinary actionwas taken against him for his absence from duty thereby impliedly agreeing for the voluntary retirement of the first party and at the same time not willing to release the terminal benefits to him as a consequence of its silent approval .; since the competent authority has not refused the voluntary retirement vide notice dated 15-05-1994 , it is deemed to be accepted by the second party under Regulation 29 (2 ) of the Pension Regulations/ clause 17 of the settlement dated 29-10-1993 . Therefore , the first party is entitled for pension from . 15-08-1994 till his lifetime under voluntary retirement , besides the release ofPF and gratuity as on 15-8-1994 with interest at 15 per cent per annum compounded quarterly on the said amount till the date of payment.

3. The management by its counter statement among other grounds contended that the first party who was working as a Clerk at their NTY layout Mysore Road Branch, Bangalore, submitted his letter dated 15-05-1994 informing thathe has opted to retire from the services of the bank voluntarily and left the services of the bank even without waiting for the reply from the bank. The bank by its letter dated 2-07-1994 informed the first party that "no voluntary retirement scheme was in force" in the bank and wanted to know his letter dated 15-05-1994 could be treated by the bank as his letter of resignation . Without replying to the said letter , the first party wrote to the bank on 29-08-1994 stating that he had given the notice of his intended voluntary retirement on 15-05-1994 and the same has become effective from 15-08-1994 and requested for sanction of PF , Gratuity and, Pension without making any reference to the bank letter dated 2-07-1994 . Therefore, the bank vide letter dated 12-10-1994 informed the first party that the provisions of bipartite settlement are binding upon him and made it very clear that there was no voluntary retirement scheme in the bank as already communicated to him vide letter dated 2-07-1994 and therefore , question of any deemed voluntary retirement w.e.f. 15-08-1994 does not arise; that the first party filed a petition before this tribunal in CGA NO.8/ 1994 and that has been dismissed on 5-10-1998 as not maintainable under Section 33 C(2) of the ID Act; that even as per the pension regulations which came into effect from 1-11-1993 retrospectively and implemented from 20-9-1995 which is subsequent to the date offirst party's letter for voluntary retirement, the first party is not entitled to pension as he did not complete the mandatory minimum qualifying service of20 years to qualify for voluntary retirement Pension as per Rule 29 of the Employees Pension Regulation 1995. The first party joined the bank services on 15-06-1977 and did not complete qualifying minimum service of 20 years as on 15-05-1994 14695/68-9

397

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

and therefore , question of voluntary retirement being enforceable from 15-8-1994 did not arise . In the result the management requested this tribunal to reject the reference .

4. The first party filed his affidavit evidence reiterating , almost. all the averments made by him in his claim statement. In his further examination chief he got marked 6 documents at Ex . W1 to W6 and referred to the four documents at Ex. A2 to Ex .A5 and Ex. R I already marked during the course of proceedings in CGA 08/1994 referred to supra . In his cross examination he stated that he completed 22 years of continuous service as on the date he submitted his above said application for voluntary retirement at Ex . WI and denied the suggestion that he did not complete 20 years of service as on the date of the above said application. When confronted with the letter at Ex. W2 dated 02-07-1994 addressed to him by the Manager of the above said branch, he stated that he did not give reply to the said letter as it was not signed by the competent authority.He admitted that he did not continue his services with the bank after the above said correspondence nor sought any leave subsequent to the said correspondence. Hedenied the suggestion that he did not complete 20 years ofqualified service, and he is not entitled for VRs . He denied the suggestion that his case did not fall under the scope of the Pension Scheme dated 23-11-1995 vide Ex . R 1 .

5.On behalf ofthe management one Mr. Pushparaj , Assistant General Manager, Indian Bank, Circle Office , Bangalore filed his affidavit evidence and his statement made in brief is that the first party by submitting letter dated 15-05-1994 left the services of the bank without waiting for reply to his letter and that after he received a letter dated 02-07-1994 from the bank stating that no Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in force and that Pension regulation came into existence from 29-09-1995. Не approached this court claiming the terminal benefits including the pension and his application came to be dismissed by this tribunal by order dated 08-05-2002. He further stated that the first party did not complete the mandatory minimum qualifying service of 20 years to qualify for pension. In his cross examination it was elicited that any authorjzed bank officer by the board of Directors is the competent authority of the bank and the competent authority alone is empowered to take the decision and that nobody can take the decision on behalf of the competent authority. It was elicited that there was no VRs existing in the year 1994 when Ex. W1 was filed. He denied the suggestion that there was VRs in 1994. He denied the suggestion that the application at Ex, W1 has neither been accepted nor rejected by the competent authority within 90 days period from the date of the application. When, confronted with the letter at Ex . W2 & W4 he is stated that those are the letters issued by the competent authority. He denied the suggestion that the letter at Ex.A2 dated 02-07- 1994 (Ex.W1 ) seeking clarification is illegal and void. He denied the suggestion. that Ex . W6 is an illegal order. It was 398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 26 , 2008 /MAGHA 6 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] elicited from him that there was no order from the bank calling upon the first party to resume duty after Ex . W1 and no action has been taken against him for his unauthorised absence. He denied the suggestion that Ex. W6 was not issuedby the competent authority and therefore, the Ex .WI is deemed to have been accepted.

retirement become effective after the expiry of three months notice period and therefore , he demanded from the management payment of Pension, PF and Gratuity benefits. It is his contention that as per Ex . W7 and Ex. R1 , the cir- culars / notifications issued by the management he is entitled' for voluntary retirement benefit . He also contended that as per Indian Bank Employee's Pension Regulations , 1995 which have come into effect from 1-11- 1993, there is a provision at Clause 29 for Pension and Voluntary Retirement if on or after the first day of November 1993 at any time after an employee has completed20 years ofqualifying service, he may give notice of not less than three months in writing to the appointing authority retire from service . He contended that as per the Clause 29(5 ) he was entitled for a grace period of 5 years service apart from the qualifying service and therefore , his qualifying service should have been taken as 22 years of service as on 15-04-1994 when he submitted his letter for voluntary retirement . Therefore , according to the first party first of all his letter at Ex . WI seeking voluntary retirement shall be taken to be effective w.e.f. 15-08-1994 , there being no decision by the competent authority viz the second party management in rejecting or accepting his request for voluntary retirement. Even otherwise , as per the aforesaid Pension Regulations , 1995 he was entitled for voluntary retirement as those pension regulations came into effect from 1-11-1993 itself.

6. Ex ,W1 is the letter dated 15-05-1994 addressed to the Zonal Manager, Indian Bank, Bangalore by the first party opting to retire from the services of the bank voluntarily with a request to relieve him from the services ofthe bank upon the expiry of notice period of one month/ three months or earlier . Ex. W2 is the letter dated 02-07-1994 by the Manager NTY Layout branch, Bangalore to the first party in response to Ex.W1 informing him that voluntary retirement scheme is not in force in their bank as such Central Office wants to know whether his letter may be treated as letter of resignation . Ex. W3 is the letter written by the first party to the Zonal Manager , Indian Bank, Bangalore stating that his notice of voluntary retirement has become effective from 15-08-1994 there being no communication by the competent authority of its decision notto accept the voluntary retirement before the expiry of the notice period of three months . He then made a request to sanction Pension , Provident Fund and Gratuity and settle the accounts by releasing the balances in those accounts. Ex .W4 is the letter dated 12-10-1994 written by the Zonal Manager to the first party stating that the provisions of Bipartite Settlement which are binding upon the first party do not provide for an award staff's voluntary retirement nat there is any voluntary retirement scheme so far introduced by the bank and this fact has been made clear by letter dated 02-07-1994 ( Ex.W2) . Therefore , in the absence of any scheme for voluntary retirement under the terms ofthe employment , question of the alleged voluntary retirement becoming effective w.e.f. 15-08-1994 does not arise and that the first party is not entitled to Pension, Provident Fund and Gratuity etc. as alleged by him in his letter dated 29-08-1994. Ex . W5 & W6 are the letter dated 03-07-1999 and 12-07-1999 written by the Assistant General Manager to the first party (not relevant for the purpose) . Ex. RI & Ex . W7 are the circulars for introduction ofPension in the banks . They are dated 23-11-1995 and 16-06-1994 respectively.

8. Whereas , it is the case of the management that the officers ofthe bank namely, the management of NTY Lay Out branch , Bangalore by letter at Ex . W2 made it abundantly clear that there being no voluntary retirement scheme in existence , the management authority wants to knowwhether his letter at Ex. W1 can be treated as a letter ofresignation and to that the first party did not respond. Therefore, according to the management when there was no scheme existing as per the Bipartite Settlement for award staff seeking voluntary retirement first of all question did not arise of the first party getting any right to seek voluntary retirement and secondly, he was made known bythe letter at Ex . W2 that there is no scheme in existence and his letter at Ex.W1 may be treated as a letter of resignation . Now coming . to the pension regulation of the year 1995, the management contended that first of all those Pension Regulations have been implemented and adopted on 26-09-1995, by publishing in Extraordinary Gazette dated 29-09-1995 and therefore, they cannot be made applicable to the case of the first party as he submitted his letter at Ex. W1 of 15-05-1994 itself and left the services of the bank from that date onwards . It is also the case ofthe management that even otherwise as per the aforesaid clause 29 ( 1 ) the voluntary retirement benefit will be available to the employee who completed 20 years of qualifying service and since the first party did not complete 20 years of qualifying service, he having joined the services of the bank in the year 1977 and submitting his letter at Ex. W1 in the year 1994 itself. Therefore , according to the management 7. The first party who contested the case in person, by his written arguments received by this tribunal by post , while , narrating the facts as mentioned in the claim statement argued that since his request for voluntary retirement vide letter dated 15-05-1994 at Ex . W1 has not been rejected by the competent authority , it is deemed to have been accepted w.e.f. 15-08-1994 i.e. after the expiry of 3 months notice period . He contended that the letters at Ex . W2 and W4 since have not been issued by the competent authorities and there has been no decision as such takenby the competent authority rejecting or accepting his voluntary retirement request, his request for voluntary 399 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26 , 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

the request of the first party seeking voluntary retirement under Ex.W1 cannot be taken to be accepted under any deemed clause nor the first party is entitled for voluntary retirement even as per clause 29 of the aforesaid pension regulations.

As noted above, the first party instead of responding to the said letter at Ex. W2 wrote another letter at Ex. W3 stating that his voluntary retirement becomes effective from 15-08-1994 there being no decision taken by the competent authority not to accept the same. Once again the Zonal Manager by letter dated 12-10-1994 informed the first party in response to his letter at Ex . W3 that he has already been intimatedby letter dated 2-07-1994 (Ex. W3 ) that there is no scheme of voluntary retirement existing and therefore , question ofvoluntary retirement becoming effective from 15-08-1994 did not arise . Therefore, it is in the light of the above said correspondence between the first party and the management, the first party now cannot putforth his claim rather claim a right of voluntary retirement becoming effective from 15-08-1994. By letter dated 2-07-1994 at Ex.W2 the first partywas made known that there was no voluntary retirement scheme existing and he was called upon to clarify whether his request can be treated as a request for resignation from services . It was incumbent on the part of the first party in response to the said letter to have made hisposition clear to the management authority as to whether he still persisted his claim ofvoluntary retirement or opted for resignation, not doing either he sends the letter at Ex. W3 saying that his Voluntary Retirement request has become matured w.e.f. 15-08-1994 after the expiry of3 months notice period. Therefore , as could be seen from the aforesaid records and the observation made , first of all the first party had no right or could not have made any valid request with the management seeking voluntary retirement there being no voluntary retirement scheme existing as on 15-04-1994. Secondly , he was made known of this fact by the management bank by letter dated 02-01-1994 well within the three months notice period. In the result, on both the count the claim of the first party that he has to be granted voluntary retirement w.e. f 15-08-1994 must fail.

10. Now, coming to the Pension Regulations . Clause 29 has given a right to the employee of the bank seeking voluntary retirement on or after 1st day of November 1993 ifhe completed 20 years of qualifying service . Assuming for a moment that the above said letter at Ex . W1 seeking voluntary retirement made on 15-04-1994 could have been consideredby the management after the implementation of the aforesaid pension regulations coming into effect from 01-11-1993 , the next question would be whether the first party was eligible to seek voluntary retirement under the aforesaid clause 29 of the Pension Regulations . This clause as noted above , makes it mandatory on the part of the employee to have completed 20 years ofqualified service if wanted to retire voluntarily under the above said Pension Scheme. There is no dispute of the fact that the first party joined the services of the management on 15-06-1977. Therefore, as on 15-05-1994 when he submitted his letter at Ex.W1 seeking voluntary retirement he had completed qualifying service of about 17 years , short by three years service to make it 20 years and to fulfill the condition as per 9. On going through the records , I find substance in the arguments advanced for the management. As noted above, on the receipt ofthe letter at Ex. W1 dated 15.04.1994 by the bank from the first party by their letter at Ex. W2, he was informed that there being no voluntary retirement scheme in vogue whether his said letter can be treated as letter of resignation . It appears ignoring the above said letter, the first party wrote , the letter at Ex. W3 stating that there being no decision by the competent authority communicated to him in not accepting the voluntary retirement before the expiry of the notice period of 3 months, the voluntary retirement is deemed to be effective from 15-08-1994 . The bank as noted above , then under the letter dated 12-10-1994 wrote to the first party that the position ofthe bank has already been made clear vide letter dated 02.07.1994 and therefore , question of voluntary retirement being effective from 15-08-1994 did not arise . The first party in order to substantiate his claim that he was entitled for voluntary retirement benefits in the first instance was required to produce any settlement or any circular/ notification as such before this tribunal to suggest that on 15-04-1994 when he submitted his letters seeking voluntary retirement , there was a scheme of voluntary retirement existing in the management bank . There is absolutely no documents produced by the first party in support of his above said claim though he referred to some such settlement in his claim statement. Infact , the very settlement taken support of by the first party in his claim statement has been relied upon by the management also saying that the terms of the said settlement are binding on both the parties. However, neither the first party produced the copy of the said settlement nor settlement copy was produced by the management . Therefore , in the absence of any such settlement showing the existence of any voluntary retirement scheme in the bank, the very request ofthe first party seeking voluntary retirement cannot be said to be a legal and valid request. To make such a request as noted above, the first party must have produced before this tribunal the document so to say the settlement providing any such Voluntary Retirement Scheme . Therefore, when there is no proof made available to this tribunal that any such voluntary retirement scheme was in vogue and prevailing as on 15-04-1994 when the first party sought for voluntary retirement vide Ex . W1 , question of this request ofthe first party being refused or accepted first of all did not arise . Even otherwise as noted above , the first party by the letter at Ex .W2 has been informed that no such voluntary retirement scheme is existing and therefore , he may inform the Central authority as to whether the letter seeking voluntary retirement can be treated as a letter of resignation.

146 Gl/ 2008--10 400.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/MAGHA 6 , 1929

clause 29 of the aforesaid employees Pension Regulations , 1955. The contention of the first party that he should have been given benefit of 5 years while counting his qualifying service as per clause 29 (5 ) of the aforesaid Pension Regulations , thereby, considering his qualifying service as22 years to give the benefit of voluntary retirement , as argued for the management cannot be entertained for the simple reason that the benefit of voluntary retirement has been extended to the employee only after he completed minimum qualifying service of 20 years . Therefore, when the employee completed qualifying service of20 years and thenapplied for voluntary retirement, it is only such an employee canbe given the benefit of extra 5 years of service while fixing his pension and not otherwise . The very opening sentence of clause 29( 5 ) makes it abundantly clear that it is the qualifying service of an employee retiring voluntarily under this regulation shall be increased by a period not exceeding 5 years . That means to say that the employee must have completed qualifying service of 20 years before he could opt for retirement under voluntary retirement scheme . In the result and the reasons foregoing , this court has no hesitation to come to the conclusion that the claim put forth by the first party workman for payment ofterminal benefits under so called voluntary retirement scheine w.e.f. 15-04-1994 is notjustified and in the result , he is not entitled to any relief on that count . Hence the followingAward:

AWARD

The reference stands rejected. No costs .

(Dictated to the P. A. transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 18th December, 2007.)

A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ, 190.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार कर्नाटका बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 194/1987 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -12011/75/1981 -डी- II ( ए) आई आर ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2008

S.O. 190. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 194/ 1987) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Karnataka

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 02-01-2008 .

[No. L- 12011 /75 / 1981 - D. II (A )/IR( B -I ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT BANGALORE

Dated : 7th December, 2007 PRESENT

SHRI A. R. SIDDIQUI Presiding Officer

C. R. No. 194/1987

I PARTY

Shri S. C. Ballary, Rep. By the President All Bank Daily Deposit Collector's Association , 9, Corporation Building Broadway,

HUBLI

II PARTY

The Chairman,

Karnataka Bank , MANGALORE

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredby clause ( d) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12011 /75 /81 - DII ( A) IR( B - I ) dated 10th August, 1987 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Karnataka Bank Ltd, Hubli in withholding the monthly commission payable to Shri S.C. Ballary, Honey DepositCanvassor, Haveri branch in demanding collection cards given to him and in terminating his services with retrospective effect from 1-09-1981 by order No.5306 /81 dated 23-09-1981 ofthe manager is justified? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled ?" 2. The case of the first party union espousing the cause ofthe first party workman as made out in the claim statement , in brief, is that he was appointed as Honey DepositCanvassor by the Second Party management on 09-03-1978 at their Haveri Branch, He was employed as a Deposit Collector on commission basis fixed by the management ; that as a Deposit Collector he used to go to customers' door to door presenting the identity card each time he received the deposits from them and has to obtain the signatures of the customers on both the portions of the challans . These collections made by him were to be entered in a sheet with account numbers to be handed 401 [[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

and therefore , the said finding is binding upon the first party. The management contended that the first party is not a workman as defined under the provisions of ID Act and therefore, this tribunal has nojurisdiction to adjudicate on the present reference and accordingly the preliminary issues may be raised on these two points and be tried in the first instance. The management further contended that the first party has given up his Canvassorship and voluntarily abandoned his claim for reinstatment and has taken back his deposit amount of Rs.1000 on 17-07-1982 and therefore , he cannot claim any relief for reinstatement, back wages and other benefits .

4. Itwould appear form the records that on the basis ofthe aforesaid contentions taken by the management this tribunal raised two Preliminary Issues as under:

(i) Whether the first party Shri Ballary is a workman as defined under the ID Act ,

(ii) Whether the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute and this tribunal has no jurisdiction .

over to the checking authority in the bank . It is only after the collections made as per the sheet prepared by the depositcollector and the challan tallied with the amount collected by him, the amount used to be remitted to the cashier ; that for the amount collected by the first party workman he was being paid wages in the form of commission; that the first party discharged his duties sincerely as a deposit collector but all of a sudden, the management terminated his services w.e.f. 1-09-1981 by way of publication in a daily newspaper , Samyukta Karnataka dated 29-09-1981stating that his services terminated w.e.f. 1-09-1981 . Therefore , the action of the management in terminating the services of the first party workman was nothing but unfair labour practice much less by way of victimisation as no valid reasons were given for termination nor any DE was held against him and that he has been condemned unheard thereby violating the principles of natural justice ; that the action of the management in terminating the services of the first party amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of Section 2(oo) of the I.D. Act and since the mandatory provisions ofSection 25F ( a, b & c) ofthe ID Act have not been followed before the termination , the termination is null and void; that the management has not paid wages earned for the month ofAugust 1981 without any valid reason though he worked for the said month and collected the deposits . Therefore , the first party workman requested this tribunal to set aside the termination order passed against him with relief of reinstatement and full back wages and commission for the month of August 1981 .

5. During the course of trial of the said issue , the management examined one witness by name Shri P. Narayanarao and closed its side for evidence . There was no cross examination to this witness on behalf of the first party. The first party by way of rebuttal examined himself as WW1 and in his cross examination, the management got marked in all 11 documents at Ex. M 1 to M 11 : Ex. M 1 is said to be the agreement between the first party and the management todo the job of deposit collector . Ex.M2 is the application filed by the first party seeking the said job . Ex.M3 is the letter dated 17-7-1982 where under the first party made a request to the management to give him back his deposit amount and to close his accounts . Ex.M4 is the letter given hy the first party on 26-10-1979 to the management . Ex.M5 to M10 are the documents pertaining to the records on the file of the appellate authority on appeal filed by the first party under Section 39 of the KSCE Act before the ALC, Belgaum Divison , Hubli. Ex . M11 is the order of districtjudge in rejecting the appeal ofthe first paretty against the order of the said Appellate Authority atEx. M10 . It is based on the aforesaid oral and documentary evidence, this tribunal by order dated 6-9-1988 , recorded the findings on the above said two issues holding that the first party was not a workman as defined under Section 2(s) of the ID Act and this tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute. Thereupon, it appears the learned counsels for the respective parties were further heard and my learned predecessor by his award dated 2-1-1988 rejected the reference based on the findings already recorded by him on the above said two issues . It is seen from the records that thereupon , the first party challenged the aforesaid award in WP No.21359/ 89 and his Lordship ofour Hon'ble High Court , while , recording a finding that the' first party comes under the definition of a workman as defined under Section 2(s) ofthe ID Act , quashed the award passed by this tribunal and remitted back the matter to 3. The management by its counter statement , while, admitting the fact that the first party workman has been appointed as a Canvassor/ collector of deposits from the customers in the Honey Deposit Scheme w.e.f. 9-03-1978 but there was no relationship of master and servant between the first party and the bank as the first party was just doing the work of Canvassor not being treated as an employee ofthe bank; that the nature of the duty performed by the workman was that he was only a Canvassor and Collector of deposits from his customers under the agreement entered between him and the bank. He was free to collect the deposits from the customers any where at any time of the day and deposits the same in the bank. He was only paid commission at different rates depending upon the nature of 'Honey deposit scheme ' . He was not given any particular place of work or assigned any specified hours of work and that he was free to engage himself to any trade or business or work during any hours of the day unlike the other bank employee . His work was not manual or clerical andwhat was paid to him was only a commission but no salary and therefore, he was not a ' workman ' . The management further took up a contention that the Appellate Authority under Karnataka Shops & Commercial Establishment Act in SCA/ SRS /81-82/2418 has held that the first party was not an ' employee' in its ordinary sense 402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/ MAGHA 6 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

services as this point goes along with the order of termination, itself.

enquire into the reference about the justifiability of termination on merits after affording the opportunity to the parties in accordance with law (This tribunal did not receive the copy of the said order from the Hon'ble High Court) and it is on 28-12-2004 the learned union representative representing the first party produced the copy of the said award in Writ Petition and thereupon, the matter was taken up for hearing.

9. Now I would like to come to the first two points involved in the reference schedule , as to whether the management was justified in withholding monthly commission payable to the first party and in demanding the collection cards from him . As noted above , the first party by letter at Ex. WI was called upon to receive the commission amount for the month of August 1981 and the first partybefore this tribunal in his examination chief, itself, has stated that he received a commission amount of Rs.3900 for the month of August 1981 from the management bank vide Ex . W1 . Merely because the payment was held back for about a period of 2½ months , it cannot be said that this action on the part of the management was illegal and unjustified . The payment as seen above , has been made within a reasonable time . The point that the management was not justified in demanding the collection cards from the first party as noted above , is to be dealt with along with the question of alleged termination order passed against the first party..

6.During, the course of second round of litigation, the managerment once again examined one witness as MW2 and closed his side for evidence. The first party also gave his statement by way of further examination chief and got marked 4 documents at Ex . W1 to W4. Ex. W1 is the letter dated 14-11-1981 written by the Manager to the first party asking him to collect his commission amount for the month ofAugust 1981. Ex. W2 is the letter dated 26-07-1981 written by the President of the Association to the Manager of Haveri branch making a request to provide sitting arrarigements for the Daily Deposit Collectors at the branch . Ex .W3 is the copy of the conciliation proceedings dated 29-9-1981 . Ex . W4 is the copy of memorandum dated 6-10-1981 submitted to the management by various Deposit Collectors asking the management to reinstate the first party into serviceland pay him the arrears due to him.

7. Learned counsel for the management, vehemently , argued that as per the agreement at Ex.M1 the first party was engaged as a Deposit Collector only for a period of one year and therefore , question of paying any compensation to him does not arise . On the point of relief of reinstatement his argument was that the first party not being an employee of the bank in its regular sense and being held as a workman only for a limited purpose, he cannot be granted the relief of reinstatement . As far as the first point that the management withheld the monthly commission payable to the first party, he submitted that the amount due towards the commission for the month of August 1981 has been received by the first party inresponse to the above said letter at Ex . WI .

10. Now coming to the question of alleged termination . His Lordship of Hon'ble High Court in the orders passed on the aforesaid Writ Petition as noted above, has recorded a finding to the effect that the first party comes under the definition of workman vide Section 2(s) ofthe ID Act. Their Lordship of Supreme Court in the decision reported in 2001 (I )LLJ SC 1045-1051 also put to rest the controversy over the question as to whether the first party as a pigmy agent is a workman under Section 2(s) of the ID Act . Now, therefore , we have to proceed on the assumption that the first party is a ' workman ' as defined under Section 2(s) of the ID Act . In the result now the next question to be considered would be whether the termination of the first party is hit by the provisions of Section 2(0) read with Section 25F of the ID Act . In order to succeed in the instant case therefore , the first party workman was required to establish before this tribunal thathe worked with the management as a Pigmy Agent for a continuous period of 240 days or more immediately preceding his termination . The fact that the first party worked with the management w..e.f. 09-03-1978 till his services were terminated w.e.f. 1-09-1981 by way of newspaper publication is not disputed and cannot be disputed. Infact , the management witness MW2 in his cross examination in no uncertain terms admitted that the first party worked in between 1979 to 1981. The management by its Counter Statement also did not dispute the fact of the first party being erigaged by it as a deposit collector under the agreement dated 9-03-1978 and that his services came to be discontinued by way ofnewspaper publication dated 29-9-1981 with retrospective effect from 1-09-1981 . It is no where the case of the management that in between the above said period there was any break in the services rendered by the first party as a Pigmy Agent .

8. Whereas , learned union representative for the first party argued that the first party undisputedly worked with the management between the year 1978 and the year 1981 continuously and therefore , it goes without saying that heworked continuously for a period of 240 days or more during 12 calendar months immediately preceding his termination and therefore , his termination amounts to retrenchment under Section 2(oo ) of the ID Act and there being no compliance of Section 25F of the ID Act, it tantamounts to illegal termination and in the result the first party is entitled to the relief of reinstatement, back wages , continuity of service and all other benefits . As far aspayment of commission amount for the month of August 1981 , he cantended that it was held back for a period of 2½ months . He did not argue on the point as to whether the management was not justified in demanding the collection cards from the first party while terminating his 403

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Therefore, as argued for the first party when he was worked with the management between the years 1978 and 1981 continuously, it goes without saying that he worked with the management continuously for a period of 240 days and more immediately preceding the date ofhis termination. MW2 who was examined before this tribunal after the remand in his examination chief has not stated anything justifying the order terminating the services of the first party. His only statement was to the effect that the first party was working as a Pigmy Agent and therefore , his agency was terminated, he being not a regular employee . Therefore , absolutely no case is made out by the management as to why it was justified in terminating the services of the first party except to say that he was not a regular employee. This contention of the management looses its importance and significance in the light of the aforesaid decision of their Lordship of Supreme Court and in the light of the order passed by our Hon'ble High Court in the aforesaid writ petition . There is again no dispute over the fact that the management did not comply with the provisions of Section 25F ofthe ID Act while terminating the services of the first party . Therefore , the action of the management in terminating the services of the first party tantamounts to retrenchment as defined under Section 2(oo) of the ID Act and since there was no compliance of Section 25F of the ID Act, preceding the termination, the termination becomes illegal and void abinitio not to be sustained in the eye of law.

11. Now the next question to be considered would be to what relief the first party is entitled for. In the normal course when the order terminating the services is held to be illegal , the natural corollary to be followed would be the reinstatement of the workman into the services of the management . However , as argued for the management , the first party not being an employee of the bank in its real sense and he being designated as a workman under the provisions ofthe ID Act for a limited purpose , there will be no justification to grant him the relief of reinstatement . Moreover , services of the first party workman in this particular case have been terminated as far back as in the year 1981 and as on to date a period ofmore than 25 years has been elapsed from the date oftermination and therefore, for this reason also it will not be proper and feasible in the interest of justice to burden the management calling upon to take back the first party into its services .

12. Now coming to the question of relief of back wages and other benefits to be granted to the first party. It appears to me worthwhile to bring on record the facts mentioned at paras 3 to 6 of the judgment of their Lordship ofSupreme Court reported in 2001 ( 1 )LLJ 1045-1051 referred to supra as under:

"TheGovt . of India, Ministry of Labour by an order dated October 3 , 1980 referred the following dispute under Sections 7A and 10( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial disputes Act between the management of eleven banks and the deposit collectors to the Industrial Tribunal , Hyderabad for adjudication.

"Whether the demands of the commission agents or as the case may be deposit collectors employed in thebanks listed in the Annexure that they are entitled to pay scales , allowances and other service conditions available to regular clerical employees of those banks is justified . If not , to what relief are the workmen concerned entitled to and from which date" ? Before the tribunal parties lead evidence both oral and documentary . After hearing the parties the tribunal by its Award dated December 22, 1988 held that the deposit collectors were workmen of the concerned bank . The tribunal then directed as follows:

"All those deposit collectors and agents who are below the age of 45 years on October 3 , 1980 (the date of the first reference of this industrial dispute) shall be considered for regular absorption for the post of clerks and cashiers if they are matriculates and above including qualified graduates and postgraduates . They may be taken to bank's service as regular employees , if they pass the qualifying examinations conducted by the banks . Those who are absorbed shall be treated on par with regular clerical employees of the bank . Those who are qualifiedwith 8th Class and below matriculation shall be considered for absorption as sub staff by conducting qualifying examinations .

Asregards the deposit collectors and agents who are above 45 years ofage on the date October 3 , 1980 and also those who are unwilling to be absorbed in regular banks service , they shall be paid full backwages of Rs . 750 per month linked with minimum deposit of Rs.7,500/- per month and they should be paid uniform conveyance of Rs . 50 /- per month for deposit of less than Rs.10,000/- and Rs.100/ - per month for deposits of more than Rs . 10,000 /- upto or above Rs.30,000/- per month they should be paid gratuity of 15 days commission for each year of service rendered .

Various writ petitions were filed by various banks and the Indian banks association . All were disposed ofby the impugned judgment dated March 20,1997. Before the High Court it has been conceded that relief of being absorbed as regular staff of the banks in clerical cadre was not available to be granted . On this concession the High Court set aside the directions of the Tribunal to absorb the deposit collectors as regular staff. The High Court, however, upheld the other directions of the Tribunal regarding payment of full back wages , conveyance allowance , gratuity etc."

13. Now, it is in the background of the above said facts and the observations made therein , we have to decide 404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 26 , 2008/MAGHA 6 , 1929

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ]

the commission income amount , the period lapsed between the date of termination till today and not ignoring the fact that the first party for the first time has been held to be a workman as defined under Section 2( s) ofthe ID Act in the year 1997 by way of the orders in the aforesaid Writ Petition No. 21359/89 , it appears to me that ends ofjustice will be met, ifhe is paid a lumpsum compensation ofRs.1½ Lakhs towards his full and final settlement of the claim against the management. Hence the following Award:

AWARD

The management is directed to pay a sum of Rs.1½ Lakhs to the first party towards his full and final settlement of the claim against it ( management) within six months from the date ofpublication ofthis award, failing which the amount shall carry interest atthe rate of 9 per cent per annum till its realisation . No costs.

(Dictated to the P. A. transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 7th December , 2007.)

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2008

का.आ. 191.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार साऊर्थन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, बैंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 28/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -41012/176/ 1995- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 3rd January, 2008

S.O. 191. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No.28/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Bangalore , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Southern Railways , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 3-1-2008

the question with regard to the quantum of the back wages to be granted to the first party . It is to be made clear at the very outset that the first party not being in the services of the management for a period of more than 25 years from the date of his alleged termination , it is just not possible to calculate the exact compensation amount to be paid to him in the light of award passed by the Industrial Tribunal , Hyderabad as brought out in para 4 of the abovesaid judgment of their Lordship of Supreme Court . There is absolutely no evidence produced on behalf of the first party as to what was the deposit amount collected by him during the period he was working as a pigmy agent . There is also no evidence on the part of the management as to what was the amount towards commission being paid to the first party during his tenure of service under the management . Learned Union Representative invited attention of this tribunal to the statement of the first party made before this tribunal recorded on the aforesaid two preliminary issues wherein he stated that he used to collect Rs.3,000 to Rs.4,000 per day . Of course this statement of the first party has remained unchallenged during the course of cross examination on behalf of the management but it cannotbe accepted without a pinch of salt . First of all, the above said statement of the first party as noted above , was recorded on the abovesaid two preliminary issues and that appears to be the reason as to why he was not confronted with the said statement in his cross examination by the management . Moreover, except the abovesaid solitary and bald statement made by the first party we have got no other piece of evidence corroborating the same . The first party in his further examination chief after the remand though stated that he received a sum of Rs . 3,900 towards the commission in the month of August 1981 in response to Ex. WI but he did not make it clear as to whether it was a commission amount , only for the month of August 1981 . Therefore , having regard to the fact that there was no positive and specific evidence either on the part of the first party or on the part of the management as to what was the commission amount actually the first party was being received towards the deposit collected by him during the period heworked with the management , it would appear to me reasonable to take his income as Rs . 750 per month linkedwith minimum deposit of Rs . 7,500 per month as has been ordered and brought out at para 4 of the decision of their Lordship of Supreme Court referred to supra .

[No. L-41012/ 176/ 1995 - IR(B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE - 560022

Dated: 6th December 2007 PRESENT

Shri A.R. SIDDIQUI Presiding Officer C.R.No.28/2006

14. In order to claim the back wages , it was incumbent on the part of the first party workman to have established before this tribunal that he has not been gainfully employed during the period he was out of the service of the management . In his further examination chief after the remand, he uttered no word on this crucial point . Even otherwise, in the natural course one has to assume that the first party had been doing some work or the other earning his livelihood and not idling himself throughout the said long period. In the result , keeping in view the said factor, 405

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 26, 2008/माघ 6 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

II PARTY

IPARTY

TheDivisional Railway 1. Shri K.J. Joseph ,

Manager,

Kavalampthara House , Gundia Post, Puttur- 574229 Dakshina Kannada District . Divisional Office , Personnel Branch ,

Southern Railway Mysore-570021 2. Shri R. Krishnappa Gowda, S/ o Venkappa Gowda,

RenjalaHouse, Gundia Post - 574229 . Dakshina Kannada District

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 2A) of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred thisdispute vide order No. L-41012/ 176/ 1995 -IR(B - I)dated 13th July, 2006 for adjudication on the following Schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Southern Railway interminating the services of Shri K.J. Joseph and Shri R. Krishnappa Gowda w.e.f. 12-3-1980 is justified' ? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?"

2. After the receipt of the reference from the Government notices were taken against both the parties and on 2-1-2007, the first party workmen made appearance before this court through counsel, Shri S.T.S. and whereas , the second party remained absent . Thereupon, a fresh notice was issued against the second party by RPAD to appear on 2-2-2007 , on which date the second party being remained absent , the matter came to be posted for filing of the, claim statement by the first party . From 2-3-2007 till 30-10-2007 the case underwent several adjournments affording opportunity to the first party workmen to file their claim statement but they neither filed claim statement nor made any representation much less through their counsel. Therefore , proceedings were taken close .

3. As seen above , despite the matter being pending before this tribunal for about a period of 10 months and despite the fact that the first party workmen made appearance through counsel , they have not made any efforts or took pains to put forth their claim statement making out the grounds as to why the order terminating their services wasnotjustified and as to why they were entitled for any reliefto be claimed against the second party management . Theproceedings before this tribunal being at the result of failure of conciliation proceedings having been taken by the first party workmen themselves, it was for the first party workmen to have kept tract and should have pursued the matter approaching this tribunal suo- motu and in the present case as noted above , having appeared before this tribunal through advocate, unfortunately, have not filed their claim statement challenging the alleged termination order passed against them by the management . Therefore , what appears is that the first party workmen are no more interested in pursuing their claim and therefore , there is no the following Award:

AWARD

The reference stands rejected . No costs .

(Dictated to the P. A. transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 7th December, 2007. )

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer

Printed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.