रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05
REGD. NO . D. L. IN 04 / 0007 /2003--05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
नई दिल्ली, सितम्बर 21 सितम्बर 27 , 2008 , शनिवार/ भाद 30-आश्विन 5 , 1930
सं. 39]
No. 39 NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 21- SEPTEMBER 17 , 2008, SATURDAY/BHADRA 30 -ASYINA 5, 1930 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
SeparatePaging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग ।। - खण्ड 3- उप - खण्ड ( il)
PART II-Section 3-Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं StatutoryOrders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
विधि और न्याय मंत्रालय
( विधि कार्य विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 8 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ. 2666-राष्ट्रपति , दिनांक 24-07-2008 (अपराह्न) से श्री एम. चन्द्रशेखरन का भारत के उच्चतम न्यायालय में भारत के अपर महासालिसिटर के पद से त्यागपत्र स्वीकार करते हैं ।
[फा. सं. 18 (8 ) /2007-न्यायिक] एम. ए. खान यूसुफी , संयुक्त सचिव एवं विधि सलाहकार MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Department of Legal Affairs ) New Delhi , the 8th September , 2008 S.O. 2666.-The President is pleased to accept the resignation of Shri M. Chandrasekharan, as Additional Solicitor General of India in the Supreme Court of India w.e.f. 24-07-2008 (AN).
(F. No. 18 (8 )/2007-Judl .
M. A. KHAN YUSUFI , Jt . Secy , & Legal Adviser
(5379)
3467 GL/2008
नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर, 2008
का.आ. 2667- केंद्रीय सरकार दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974का 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियोंका प्रयोग करते हुए, सर्वश्री राजीव पाटिल , मेघश्याम के. कोचरेकर और संदीप काशीनाथ शिंदे , अधिवक्ताओं को , मुंबई स्थित उच्चन्यायालय में भारत संघ या केंद्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय द्वारा या उसके विरुद्ध सभी दाँडिक मामलों का, जिनके अंतर्गत दॉडिक रिट याचिकाएं, दांडिक अपीलें , दाडिक पुनरीक्षण , दांडिक निर्देश और दांडिक आवेदन भी है , संचालन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से एक वर्ष की और अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश तक , इनमें से जो भी पूर्वतर हो , इस शर्त के अधीन रहते हुए अपर लोक अभियोजक नियुक्त करती है कि सर्वश्री राजीव पाटिल , मेघश्याम के. कोचरेकर और संदीप काशीनाथ शिंदे, अधिवक्ता अपनी नियुक्ति की अवधि के दौरान ऊपर निर्दिष्ट किसी दांडिक मामले में. भारत संघ या केंद्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय के विरुद्ध मुंबई स्थित उच्च न्यायालय में उपसंजात नहीं होंगे ।
[फा. सं. 23 (2) /2008 - न्या.] एम. ए. खान युसुफौ, संयुक्त सचिव और विधि सलाहकार 5380
[PART II - SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 /ASVINA 5, 1930
New Delhi , the 16th Septeinber, 2008
orders, whichever is earlier , subject to the condition that Shri G.N. Srinivasan , Advocate shall not appear against the Union of India or any Department or Office of the Central Government in any criminal case referred to above in theHigh Court ofJudicature at Mumbai during the period ofhis appointment .
[F. No. 23 (2)/2008 -Judl .]
M.A. KJIAN YUSUFI .Jt . Secy. & Legal Adviser नईदिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर , 2008
S.O. 2667. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( 2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints S/ Shri Rajiv Patil , Meghashyam K. Kocharckar and Sandeep Kashinath Shinde, Advocates as Additional Public Prosecutor for the purpose of conducting all criminal cases including criminal writ petitions , criminal appeals , criminal revisions . criminal references and criminal applicationsby or against the Union of India or any Departinent or Office of the Central Governinent . in the High Court of Judicature as Mumbai , with effect from the dateof publication of this notification in the Official Gazette, fot a period of one year or until further orders , whichever is carlier, subject to the condition that S/Shri Rajiv Patil , Meghashyam K. Kocharekar and Sandeep Kashinath Shinde . Advocates , shall not appear against the Unionof India or any Department or Office of the Central Government in any criminal case referred to above , in the High Court of Judicature at Murnbai during the period of his appointment.
[ F.No. 23 (2 )/2008 - Jull . ]
M.A. KIIAN YUSUFI , Jt. Secy . & Legal Adviser नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ. 2669-केंद्रीय सरकार दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973 (1974 का 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मुंबई स्थित उच्च न्यायालय में भारत संघ या केंद्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय द्वारा या उसके विरुद्ध सभी दांडिक मामलों का, जिनके अंतर्गत दांडिक रिट याचिकाएं , दौंडक अपीलें , दांडिक पुनरीक्षण , दांडिक निर्देश और दांडिक आवेदन भी हैं , संचालन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए , श्री जितेन्द्र आर. सोलंकी. अधिवक्ता की अपर लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्ति की अवधिको तुरंत प्रभाव से एक वर्ष को और अधि के लिए या अगले आदेश तक, इनमें से जो भी पूर्वतर हो , इस शर्त के अधीन रहते हुए विस्तारित करती है कि श्री जितेन्द्र आर, सांलंकी , अधिवक्ता , एक वर्ष की विस्तारित अवधि के दौरान ऊपर निर्दिष्ट किसी दांडिक मामले में भारत संघ या केंद्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय के विरुद्ध मुंबई स्थित उच्च न्यायालय में उपसंजात नहीं होंगे ।
[फा. सं. 23 (2 )/2008 -न्या. |
एम. ए. खान युसुफी, संयुक्त सचिव और विधि सलाहकार New Delhi , the 16th September , 2008
फ्रा.आ. 2668 केंद्रीय सरकार , स्वापक औषधि और मनःप्रभावी पदार्थ अधिनियम , 1985 ( 1985 का 61 ) की धारा 36 के साथ पठित दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , श्री जी, एन. श्रीनिवासन, अधिवक्ता को मुंबई स्थित बम्बई उच्च न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रवर्तन निदेशालय , केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो , स्वापक नियंत्रण ब्यूरो तथा अन्य अभिकरणों के सभी दौड़क मामलों का संचालन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए तुरंत प्रभाव से एक वर्ष की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश तक, इनमें से जो भी पूर्वतर हो , इस शर्त के अधीन रहते हुए विशेष सांक अभियोजक नियुक्त करती है कि श्री जी.एन. श्रीनिवासन , अधिवक्ता, अपनी नियुक्ति को अवधि के दौरान ऊपर निर्दिष्ट किसी दाडिक मामले में भारत संघ या केंद्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय के विरुद्ध मुंबई स्थित उच्च न्यायालय में उपसंजात नहीं होंगे ।
[फा. सं. 23 ( 2 )/20008 न्या. ]
एम. ए. खान सूफी, संयुक्त सचिव एवं विधि सलाहकार New Delhi , the 16th September, 2008
S.O. 2669. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Sechon 2-4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government herebyextends the term of appointment of Shri Jitendra R. Solanki , Advocate as Additional Public Prosecutor for the purpose ofconducting all criminal cases including criminal writ petitions , criminal appeals , criminal revisions , criminal references and criminal applications by or against the Union of India or any Department or Office of the Central Government, in the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai . with immediate effect for a further period of one-year or until further orders , whichever is earlier , subject to the condition that Shri Jitendra R. Solanki , Advocate, shall not appear against the Union of India or any Department or OfficeoftheCentral Govement in any criminal case referred to above , in the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai during the extended period of one year .
[F. No. 23 (2 )2008-Judi . ]
M.A. KHAN YUSUFI . Jt . Secy , & Legal Adviser
कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय
(कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )
नई दिल्ली 15 सितम्बर , 2008
S.O. 2668.-Jn exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( 2 of 1974) , read with Section 36 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985 (61 of 1985) , the Central Government hereby appoints of Shri G. N. Srinivasan , Advocate as Special Public Prosecutor, for the purpose of conducting all criminal cases of Directorate of F.nforcement . Central Bureau of Investigation , Narcotics Control Bureau and other agencies before the High Court of Bombay at Mumbai with immediate effect for a period ofone year or until further
का. आ. 2670.-केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( (946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की 5381 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( i) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 409 , 489- बी और 489- सी के तहत और ( 3 ) मामला सं. 571/08 और उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रचरणों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्धृत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।
[税 228/72/2008-ए.हे. डी. - 1 ]
चंद्र प्रकाश, अवर सचिव
NewDelhi, the 15th Septentber, 2008 धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार, गृह ( पुलिस ) , खण्ड-3 की अधिसूचना सं. 2843 पी/6-पी-3-2008-15 (59 ) पी/08दिनांक 4अगस्त, 2008 द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार की सहमति से पुलिस थाना छर्रा, जिला अलीगढ़ में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) , की धारा 489-वी , 489-सी , 124- ए एवं 420 के तहत दर्ज अपराध सं. 357 एवं 358/2007 के अधीन अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं. 228/69/2008 - ए, बी.डी.-[1 ]
चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training) New Delhi , the 15th September, 2008
S.O. 2671. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Dethi Special Police Establishment Act . 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Uttar Pradesh , Ilome ( Police ) Section-3 videNotification No. 3259P (2 ) /VI- P- 3-2008-15 (61) P/2008 dated Bth August , 2008 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation of ( 1 ) Case Crime Na . 252/08 under sections 489 -B and 489-C, of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at Police Station GRP Lucknow, (2 ) Case Crime No. 557/08 under sections 489- B and 489-C of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at Police Station Duinariaganj , Siddharthnagar and ( 3 ) Case Crime No. 571 08 under sections 409 , 489-B and 489 -C ofthe Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) registered at Police Station Dumariaganj , Siddharthnagar and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the offence mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course ofthe same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
No. 228/72/2008-AVD-II )
CHANDRA PRAKASII , Under Secy.
S.O. 2670.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent ofthe StateGovernment ofUttar Pradesh, Home ( Police) Section-3 videNotification No. 2843P/6- P-3-2008-15 (59) P/08 dated 4th August, 2008 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh forinvestigation ofCase Crime Nos. 357 and 358/2007 under sections 489 - B , 489- C, 124-A and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) registered at Police Station Chharra, District Aligarh and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the offence mentioned above any other offence or offences committed in the course ofthe same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर , 2008 [No. 228/69/2008 -AVD- II ]
CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2671.-केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार , गृह ( पुलिस ) , खण्ड-3 की अधिसूचना से 3259- पी ( 2)/6-पी-3-2008-15 (61 ) पी/2008 दिनांक 8 अगस्त, 2008 द्वारा भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) , की धारा 489-बी और 489-सी, के तहत पुलिस थाना जीआरपी लखनऊ में दर्ज ( 1 ) मामला सं. 252/08 , भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 489- बी और 489 -सी, के तहत पुलिस थाना डुमरियागंज , सिद्धार्थनगर में दर्ज ( 2) मामला सं. 557/08 एवं भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का
का. आ. 2672. केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार , गृह ( पुलिस ) , खण्ड-3 की अधिसूचना सं 2936-पी( 2 )/6-पी-3-2008-15 ( 59 ) पी/2008 दिनांक 12 अगस्त, 2008 , द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार की सहमति से पुलिस थाना कोतवाली नगर , जिला बिजनौर में भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) , की धारा 489 -श्री एवं 489-सी, के तहत दर्ज अपराध सं. 1281/2008 के अधीन अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की 5382
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 /ASVINA 5. 1930
शक्तियों ॐ धिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है:
[सं. 228/74/2009 एवोदी ।।। चंद्र प्रकाश, अदर चित्र Per Deilt the 5th Septembet. 2003 5.49. 2072.--In exercise of the powers coulered by b- section Section 5 read with Seutton to of the Delhi Spec Establishment Act , 1946.4 No. 25 (1 ) ra Concement with the consent of the Stan Governor tar Pradesh , Home (Police) Sextien vids Norification No 2936P (2 ): VI -P -3-2008-15 (59) P/2008 12th August, 2008 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Holice Establishment to the whole on the State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation of Case Crime No. 1281 sections 489- Band 489 - C , ofthe Indian Penalo A No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at Police Station : City , District Bijnor and attempts , abetmesispiracies in relation to or in connection with the ones mentioned above and any other offence oroffencer committed in the course of the same transactiou of ariseng out of the same tacts.
[No.228/74/2008 - AVD - 11 ] CHANDRA PRAKASH. Under Secy. नई दिल्ली.! .. सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2673 , केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापनर अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पतित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य सरकार . गृह ( राजनीतिक ) विभाग की अधिसूचना सं. ४६-पी. एस. दिनांक 12 अगस्त, 2008 द्वारा प्राप्त पश्चिम बंगाल सरकार की सहमति से राजस्व आसूचना निदेशालय , कोलकाता द्वारा दिनांक 10-06-2008 को मोहम्मद समीरुद्दीन और उसकी पत्नी अंजुमन समीर , जो बेनापाल- पेत्रापोल भू-सोमा के साथ से होते हुए बांग्लादेश से भारत में दाखिल हुए इनके पास दो बैग और दो ट्राली बैग जो इनको ढाका के एक याकूब नाम के व्यक्ति ने सौंपा था तथा जिनको ले जाकर हावड़ा में कुमार नाम के व्यक्ति के सुपुर्द किया जाना था . के कब्जे से 35,38,500 रुपए के जाली भारतीय मुद्रा नोट जब्त किए गए, के विरुद्ध केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो , नई दिल्ली मैं कानूनी कार्रवाई के लिए प्राप्त राजस्व आसूचना निदेशालय, कोलकाता जोनल यूनिट हां ची मिन , सरानी , कोलकाता-700001 को शिकायत सं. डीआरआईएफ मं. 92 कोल 2008 ( पी ) 983 दिनांक 17-06-2008 के तहत भारतीय दंड संहिता 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 489 - बी , 489- सी सपतित धारा 120-बी के अधीन उपरोक्त अपराधों से संबंधित उनकी धोखाधड़ी और किसी अन्य लोकसेवक या व्यक्ति तथा उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अधवा अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्लो विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की
[PART I St 3( ii ) शक्तियों और अधिकारिका का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य पर करती है ।
| सं. 228/ 76/2008 - एदोडी -11 ] चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव New Dell the 15th September , 2008 S.O. 2673.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act . 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of West Bengal . Home ( Politicall Department vide Notification No. 896 - P S. dared 12th August 2008 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction ofthe members of the Delhi special Police Establishmentto thewhole of the State of West Bengal for investigation of the case relating to seizure of Fake Indian Currency Notes . ofRs. 38 , 38, 500 effected on 10-6-2008 by the Directorate ofRevenue Intelligence. Kolkata from the possession of one Mohaminad Samiruddin and his wife Anzuman Samir who entered India from Bangladesh via Benapole-Petrapole landborder alongwith two bags and two trolley bags which had beenhanded over by one Yakub of Dhaka and carried by them and meant to be delivered to one Kumar at Howrah. against whom Central Bureau of Investigation . New Delhi received complaint for initiating legal action under Indian Penal Code from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Kolkata, Zonal Unit 8. Ho Chi Minh Sarani , Kolkata -700001 vide Complaint No. DRI F. No. 92 / KOL 2008 ( P)/983 dated 17-6-2008 , for their fraudulent acts and any other public servants or persons , in refation to said offences under Sections 489 - B , 489 - C read with 1210 B ofthe Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No 45 of 1860 ) and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction of emerging out of the same facts or facts in relation to aforesaid seizure.
[No 228/76/ 2008 - AVD- II CHANDRA PRAKASH . Under Secy . नई दिल्ली. १० सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ. 2674 कंन्द्रीय सरकार दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्री एस कल्याणासुंदरम, अधिवक्ता को विशेष जज का न्यायालय , चेन्नई में दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के.अ.ब्यूरो ) द्वारः संस्थित मामलों में अभियोजन तथा अपील पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय ( यों ) में अपील , पुनरीक्षण और किसी अन्य न्यायालय में इससे संबंधित अथवा प्रासंगिक किसी अन्य विषय का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[ 225/41 /2007 - एवोडी- II ] चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 16th September, 2008 S.O. 2674.-In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section (8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri S. Kalyanasundaram , Advocate as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution in the cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI ) , in the Special Judge Court , Chennai and appeals , revisions in the appellate or revisional court(s ) and any other matter concerned therewith or incidental thereto in any other court .
[No. 225/41 /2007-AVD- II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर, 2008
का.आ. 2675.- केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973( 1974का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप - धारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में कोलकाता में विचारण न्यायालयों में दिल्ली विशेष पुस्लिस स्थापना ( के.अ. न्यूरो ) द्वारा संस्थित और केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए मामलों के अभियोजन और विधि द्वारा स्थापित्त पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है:-
सर्वश्री
डी.सी. सरकार,
2 समीर रंजन भट्टाचार्य ,
3. बिस्वजीत पुसीलाल ।
[सं. 225/30/2007 - एवीडी- II ]
चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th September, 2008 S.O. 2675.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted bythe Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI ) in the State of West Bengal at Kolkata as entrusted to themby the Central Bureau of Investigation in the trial courts and appeals/revisions or other matters arising out ofthese cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law:
1. Shri D.C. Sarkar,
2. Shri Samir Ranjan , Bhattacharya,
3. Shri BiswajitPusilal .
[No.225/30/2007 -AVD- II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.
5383
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008 / आश्विन 5 , 1930
नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर, 2008
का.आ. 2676 केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को केरल राज्य, कोचीन में विचारण न्यायालयों में दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के.अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा संस्थित और उन्हें केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा सौंपे गए मामलों के अभियोजन और विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरोक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अपीलों/पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है :-- सर्वश्री
1. सी.पी. उदयभानु ,
2. के.डी. बाब
3. अजीत कुमार ।
[सं. 225/31/2007-एवोडी-11 ]
चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 17th September , 2008 S.O. 2676. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) in the State of Kerala at Cochin as entrustedto them by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the trial courts and appeals/revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law:
S/Shri
1. C.P. Udayabhanu ,
2. K. D. Babu,
3. Ajit Kumar.
[No.225/31 /2007-AVD - II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy .
वित्त मंत्रालय
(राजस्व विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 9 सितम्बर, 2008
का.आ. 2677-केंन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में राजस्व विभाग के अधीन केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क बोर्ड के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को जिनके 80% कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है :T 5384
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 27, 2008/ ASVINA 5 , 1930
1. कार्यालय आयुक्त , केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क, 48, प्रशासनिक क्षेत्र , अरेरा हिल्स, भोपाल ।
[ फा. सं. 11012/1/2008 - हिन्दी-2 ] मधु शर्मा , निदेशक ( राजभाषा ) MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department ofRevenue) New Delhi . the 9th September , 2008 S.O. 2677.In pursuance ofSub Rule 4 ofrule 10 of the Official Language (Use ofOfficial Purpose ofthe Union ) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the Central Board of Excise & Customs , Department of Revenue , the 80% staffwhereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi 1. Office ofthe Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs , 48 , Administrative Area . Arera Hills. Bhopal.
[F. No. [ 1012 / 1 /2008 -Hindi -2 ] MADHU SIHARMA , Director (OL) ( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड ) नई दिल्ली, 18 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2678 सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2008 से संगठन कैन्सर इन्स्टीट्यूट ( डब्ल्यूआई ए) , चेन्नई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में संलग्न ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नामतः- (i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;
( ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा इसकं नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान को जारी रखेगा;
(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से ऐसी खाता- बहीं की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत् सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में
[PART [ 1-Sec.3 ( ii) ) क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।
(iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत् सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।
2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-
( क ) पैराग्राफ । के उप -पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा यही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा
( ख) पैराग्राफ के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा ( ग) पैराग्राफ के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा ( घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप करना बंद कर देगा अधवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य- कलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अधवा
( ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के उपबंधों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।
[ अधिसूचना सं. 92/2008/ फा. सं. 203/ 141/2007- आ.क.नि.- 11 | रेनूजौहरी , निदेशक ( आं.क.नि.- ]] ) (Central Board of Direct Taxes) New Delhi , the 18th September, 2008 S.O.2678 .-11 is hereby notified for general information that the organization Cancer Institute ( WIA), Chennai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income - tax Act. 1961 ( said Act ) , read with Rules SC and SE of the Income -tax Rules , 1962 ( said Rules ) , with effectfrom1-4-2008 in the category of other Institution ', partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:
(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;
( ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students,
(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of account in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research, reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research . get such books audited by an [ भाग ॥ - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
accountant as defined in the explanation to sub-section (2) of Section 288 of the saidAct and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;
( iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the anditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .
2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-
(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or
(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or (c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub- paragraph ( iv ) ofparagraph 1 ; or
(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or
(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules SC and 58 of the said Rules .
[Notification No. 92/2008/F. No. 203 / 141 /2007 /ITA- II ] RENU JAUHRI , Director ( ITA - II ) ( वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 18 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ., 2679, बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर , एतद्वारा , घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 के उपबंध , आईसीआईसीआई बैंक पर , उसके द्वारा जून 2007 में 10.88 करोड़ इक्विटी शेयरों के सार्वजनिक निर्गम और 5.00 करोड़ अमेरिकी जमा रसीदों ( एडीआर ) के मामले में , लागू नहीं होंगे
[फा. सं. 13/6/2007-बीओए ] डी. डी. माहेश्वरी , अवर सचिव
5385
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930.
(Department of Financial Services) New Delhi , the 18th September , 2008 5.О. 2679. In exercise of the powers conferredby Section 53 ( 1 ) ofthe Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949) the Central Government, on the recommendations of Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions of Section 13 of the said Act , shall not apply to ICICI Bank Ltd. in case ofthe public issue of 10.88 crore equity shares and 5.00 crore American Deposit Receipts ( ADRs)by the Bank in June , 2007 .
[F. No. 13/6/2007 -BOA] D. D. MAHESHWARI , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली , 19 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ. 2680, राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक अधिनियम , 1987 ( 1987 का 53 ) की धारा 6 के खण्ड ( च ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा, निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से 3 वर्षों के लिए राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक ( एनएचबी ) के निदेशक मण्डल में निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है :-
( i ) आवास/ शहरी विकास विभाग के मुख्य सचिव , राजस्थान सरकार , जयपुर । ( i ) आवास/ शहरी विकास विभाग के मुख्य सचिव , तमिलनाडु सरकार , चेन्नई ।
[फा. सं. 7 / 1 /2008- बीओ-1 ] जी. ची. सिंह , उप सचिव.
New Delhi , the 19th September , 2008 S.O. 2680. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( f) of Section 6 of the National Housing Bank Acı , (1987) (53 of 1987 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following persons to be the Directors on the Board of Directors ofNational Housing Bank ( NHB ) for a period of three years with effect from the date of issue of this notification :-
(i ) Principal Secretary of the Housing/ Urban Development Department , Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
(i) Principal Secretary of the Housing/ Urban Development Department , Government ofTamil Nadu, Chennai .
[ F. No. 7 / 1 /2008-00-1
G. B. SINGH , Dy. Secy.
5386
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 / ASVINA 5, 1930
रेल मंत्रालय ( रेलवे बोर्ड)
नई दिल्ली , 19. सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ. 2681.- रेल मंत्रालय ( रेलवे बोर्ड ) , राजभाषा नियम 1976 ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) के नियम 10 के उपनियम ( 2 ) और (4 ) के अनुसरण में राइट्स लिमिटेड, गुड़गांत्र के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को जहां 80 % से अधिक अधिकारियों/कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है:-
राइट्स लिमिटेड , परियोजना कार्यालय , वीएटी 741/742 , चौथी मंजिल , टावर नं. 7 , इंटरनेशनल इन्फोटेक पार्क, वाशी रेलवे स्टेशन कॉम्प्लेक्स , वाशी , नवी मुंबई -400 703
[सं. हिंदी-2000४ /रा. भा. 1/12/1 ] संसार चंद , निदेशक ( राजभाषा ) , रेलवे बोर्ड MINISTRY OF RAILWAY (RailwayBoard)
New Delhi , the 19th September, 2008 S.O. 2681.-Ministry of Railways ( RailwayBoard), in pursuance of Sub Rule ( 2 ) and (4 ) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages ( use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules,1976, hereby, notify the following office of RITES Limited, Gurgaon, where 80 % or more Officers /Employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hinds:...
Rites Limited, Project Office, VAT741/742, 4th Floor , Tower No. 7 International Infotech Park , Vashi Railway Station Complex, Vashi, Navi Mumbai-400 703
[No. Hindi -2008/0.1. 1/12/11 SANSAR CILAND, Director ( D.L. ) , Railway Board सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली. 10 सितम्बर , 2008
का, आ. 2682.-- इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 31 मई , 2007 को समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अनुक्रम में और चलचित्र ( प्रमाणनः नियमावली, 1983 के नियम 7 और 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केंद्र सरकार तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्षों को अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेशों तक,, जो भी पहले हो, श्री के. राजशेखर प्रसाद को केंद्रीन फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के हैदराबाद सलाहकार पैनल के सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[ फा.सं. 809/1/2007 - एफ ( मी ) ]
संगीता सिंह, निदेशक ( फिल्म)
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING
New Delhi , the 10th September, 2008 S.O. 2682. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number dated 31st May, 2007 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 ofthe Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 ofthe Cinematograph (Certification ) Rules , 1983 the Central Governmem is pleased to appoint Shri K. Rajasekhara Prasadas a member ofthe Hyderabad advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further arders, whichever is earlier .
IF No. 809/ 1 /2007 - F (C) ] SANGEETA SINGH , Director ( Films) नई दिल्ली , 10 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ. 2683,-इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 3 फरवरी , 2008 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अनुक्रम में और चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियमावली , 1983 के नियम 3 के साथ पठित्त चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केंद्र सरकार तत्काल प्रभाव से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, श्रीमती उर्मिला रूंगटा, 64 , जुहू गोल्ड मिस्ट, गुलमोहर रोड, जे श्री पी डीस्कीम , फोर्ट, मुम्बई -400049 को केंद्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[ फा नं. 09 /11 /2007- एफ ( सी ) | संगीता सिंह, निर्देशक ( फिल्म) New Delhi , the 10th September , 2008 ... 2683.-1n continuation of this Ministry's Notification ofeven number stated 5th February, 2008 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 137 of 1952) read with rule 3 of the Cinematograph ( Certification ) Rules, 1983 the Cemral Government es pleased to appoint Sant . Urmila Roongia , 64, Zuhu Gold Mist Gulmohar Road . JVPD Scheme, Fort, Mumbai - 400019 as a member ofthe Central Board of Fiim Certification with immediate cllect for a perind of three years and notit turtler orders .
No. 809 :11 :2007 - F ( C ) SANGEITA SINGH, Director ( Films )
विदेश मंत्रालय
(सी. पी. वी .
नई दिल्ली ।
का.आ. 2684.- राजनयिक कमली अधिकारी शपथ शुल्क) अधिनियम, 1948 1948 का केक अंक का कं अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वाणका प्रान कॉसन्नावास.
5387
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5, 1930
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (in) ]
फ्रांसिस्को में श्री बी.एन. दता , सहायक को 1-9-2008 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[सं. टी-4330/01 /2006 ]
प्रीतम लाल , अवर सचिव (कौंसुलर ) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (C.P.V. Division) NewDelhi , the Ist September,2008
5.0. 2684.-In pursuance of the clause ( ii) of the Section 2 ofthe Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 , the Central Government hereby authorize Shri B.N. Dutta, Assistant to perform the duties ofAssistant Consular Officer in the Consulate General of India, San Francisco.
[No. Τ. 4330/1/2006] PRITAM LAL , Under Secy .(Consular) नई दिल्ली , 11 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2685, राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) खण्ड 2 के अंक ( क ) केअनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का प्रधान कौंसलावास, शंघाई में श्री सूर्योदयः सिंह रावत , सहायक को 11-9-2008 से सहायक कौसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[सं. टी-4330/01/ 2006 ]
प्रीतम लाल , अवर सचिव (कौंसुलर ) NewDelhi , the i 1th September , 2008 S.O. 2685.-In pursuance of the clause (ii) ofthe Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 , the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Suryodaya Singh Rawat, Assistant to perform the duties ofAssistant Consular Officer in the Consulate General of India, Shanghai ..
[No. T. 4330/1/2006] PRITAM LAL, Under Secy.(Consular) नई दिल्ली , 17 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ. 2686.-राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां) खण्ड 2 के अंक ( क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास , लिस्बन में श्री एर्नस्ट अलेक्सौंडर एडम्स , सहायक को 17-9-2008 से सहायक कौसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[सं. टी-4330/01/2006] प्रीतम लाल , अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर ) New Delhi , the 17th September , 2008 S.O. 2686.-in pursuance of the clause (ii ) of the Section 2 ofthe Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948, the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Ernest Alexander Adams , Assistant to 3467G1/08-2
perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Lisbon.
[No. T. 4330/1/2006] PRITAM LAL, Under Sccy . (Consular) स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालয় [ आयुर्वेद , योग व प्राकृतिक चिकित्सा, सिद्ध , यूनानी एवं होम्योपैथी (आयुष ) विभाग ]
नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2687. - केंद्रीय , सरकार राजभाषा " संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग " नियम 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय के आयुर्वेद , योग व प्राकृतिक चिकित्सा , सिद्ध, यूनानी एवं होम्योपैथी (आयुष ) विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित संस्थानों जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी में कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है :-
लखनऊ 1. केंद्रीय आयुर्वेद अनुसंधान संस्थान
भुवनेश्वर 2. केंद्रीय आयुर्वेद अनुसंधान संस्थान
झाँसी 3. क्षेत्रीय अनुसंधान संस्थान (आयुर्वेद)
4. क्षेत्रीय अनुसंधान संस्थान ( आयुर्वेद ) बंगलूर 5. क्षेत्रीय आयुर्वेद अनुसंधान संस्थान आयुर्वेद जम्मू 6. क्षेत्रीय आयुर्बेद अनुसंधान संस्थान आयुर्वेद विजयवाड़ा
पटना 7. क्षेत्रीय यूनानी चिकित्सा अनुसंधान संस्थान
[सं. ई. 11018 (2 ) /2/2003- भा. चि. प. (रा.भा. ) ]
शिव बंसत , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE [Department of Ayurved, Yoga & Naturopathy , Unani, Sidha, Homoeopathy (Ayush) |
NewDelhi , the 4th September , 2008 S.O. 2687.- In pursuance of sub - rule (4) of the Rule 10 oftheOfficial Language " Use for official purpose ofthe Union " Rule , 1976 the Central Govt . hereby notifies the following offices under the administrative control of Department of AYUSH , Ministryof Health & Family Welfare whereof 80 % staff have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi :
Lucknow 1. Central Ayurved Research Institule
Bhubneswar 2. Central Ayurved Research Institute
Jhansi 3. Regional Research Institute (Ayurved)
Banglore 4. Regional Research Institute (Ayurved)
Jammu 5. Regional Research Institute (Ayurved)
Vijaywada 6. Regional Research Institute (Ayurved)
Patna 7. Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine
[No. E- 11018 (2)/2/2003-1.S.M .( O.L . ) ]
SHIV BASANT , Jt . Secy.
5388
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 /ASVINA 5, 1930
( स्वास्थ्य विभाग) नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2688.-- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( १ ) ( ख ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में डा. ओ. पी . तिवारी , आचार्य महात्मा गांधी स्मारक चिकित्सा महाविद्यालय , इंदौर , सदस्य , काय चिकित्सा विभाग , देवी अहिल्या विश्वविद्यालय , इंदौर को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से पांच वर्षों के लिए भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के सदस्य के रूप में देवी अहिल्या विश्वविद्यालय की परिषद् द्वारा निर्वाचित किया जाता है :---
अतः , अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में , केंन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्त्रास्थ मंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का .आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्ः-
उक्त अधिसूचना में शीर्षक " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अधीन निर्वाचित " के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 33 के सामने निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां रखी आएंगी , अर्थात्ः-
देवी अहिल्या विश्वविद्यालय " " 33. डा. ओ. पी. तिवारी , आचार्य . महात्मा गांधी स्मारक चिकित्सा महाविद्यालय , इंदौर
[ संख्या जी -11013/ 1 /007 - एम ई ( नोति -1 ) ] एस. के. गुप्ता , अवर सचिव (Department ofHealth ) New Delhi , the 15th September , 2008 S.U. 2688.-Whereas in pursuance ofthe provision of sub-section ( 1 ) ( b ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) Dr. O.P. Tiwari , Professor , Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College , Indore , a member of the faculty of Medicine , Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya , Indore has been elected by the Council of Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya to be a member of the Medical Council of India for five years with effect from date of issue of this notification .
Now , therefore , in pursuance of the provision of the sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 1.38 dated the 9th January , 1960, namely:-
In the said Notification , under the heading. " Elected under clause ( b ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 " , against serial number 33 , the following entries shall be substitued. namely:-
[ PART 11- Sec . 3 ( ii) ] "33. Dr. О.Р. Тiwari , Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya * Professor Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College , Indore
[ No. V. 11013/ 1 /2007 - MI ( P- 1 ) ]
S. K. GUPTA , Under Secy .
( स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण विभाग )
शुद्धि-पत्र नई दिल्ली . 33 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2689.- इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 25 जून , 2008 की अधिसूचना सं. यू. 12012/ 379 /2006 - एमई ( पी- II ) के आशिक संशोधन में शीर्षक " पंजीकरण हंतु संक्षेपण " ( स्तम्भ-3 ) में के अन्तर्गत शर्तों को निम्नलिखित द्वाग प्रतिस्थापित किया जाए , अर्थात्ः " यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अहंता होंगी यदि यह पणिपाल विश्वविद्यालय ( पूर्व में मणिपाल उच्चतर शिक्षा अकादमी के रूप में जाना जाने वाला ) ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) मणिपाल , कनाटक द्वारा कस्तूरबा मेडिकल कालेज . मणिपाल , कर्नाटक एवं कस्तूरबा मेडिकल कालेज , मंगलूर , कर्नाटक में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में वर्ष 2009 में अथवा उससे पहले प्रदान की गई हो । "
अधिसूचना की शेष त्रिषय-वस्तु अपरिवर्तित रहेगी । [सं. यू 12012 /379 /2006 - एमई ( पी -11 ) ] एन, बारिक, अवर सचिव (Department of Itealth and Family Welfare) Carrigendum New Delhi , the 23rd September , 2008 S.O. 2689.- In partial modification to this Ministry's Notification No.U. 120 12 /379 / 2006 - ME ( P - 11 ) dated 25th June 2008 , under the heading Abbreviation for Registration " [ in column (3 ) ] , the conditions mentioned there in may be replaced by the following namely: -
"This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Manipal University ( Formerly known as Manipal Academy of Higher Education ) (Deemed University ) Manipal . Karnataka when granted in or before the year 2009 in respect of students trained at Kasturba Medical College . Mainpal , Karnataka and Kasturba Medical College . Mangalore , Karnataka . "
Remaining contents of the Notification shall remain unchanged.
No. 6. 12012 /379 /2006- MF ( P- 110 ] N. BARIK , Under Secy.
[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (11) ]
पोत परिवहन , सड़क परिवहन और राजमार्ग मंत्रालय (पोत परिवहन विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ, 2690,-राष्ट्रीय नौवहन बोर्ड- नियमावली , 1960 के नियम 4 के साथ पठित वाणिज्य पोत परिवहन अधिनियम , 1958 (1958का अधिनियम सं. 44 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकार प्रयुक्त करके और इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 1-9-2008 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा , 1 सितम्बर, 2008 से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए राष्ट्रीय नौवहन बोर्ड के निम्नलिखित छः सदस्योंके नाम अधिसूचित करती है
1. श्री एस. हाजरा, अध्यक्ष और प्रबंध निदेशक , भारतीय नौवहन निगम लिमिटेड ।
2. श्री अतुल अग्रवाल, संयुक्त प्रबंध निदेशक, मर्केटर लाइन्स लि. । 3. श्री वाई. डी. खटाऊ , प्रबंध निदेशक, वरूण शिपिंग कं. लि. । 4. डॉ. शांति पटेल , अध्यक्ष, भारतीय राष्ट्रीय नाविक संघ । 5. श्री एस. एस. खान , महासचिव , भारतीय समुद्री संघ । 6. डॉ. एम. के. पांधे , उपाध्यक्ष , फार्वर्ड सीमैन्स यूनियन ऑफ इंडिया । शेष छः सदस्यों के नाम बाद में अधिसूचित कर दिए जाएंगे । [फा. सं. एस एस-18011 / 1 /2008- एस एल ]
ए. के. तिवारी , उप सचिव MINISTRY OF SHIPPING ROAD TRANSPORTAND HIGHWAYS
(DepartmentofShipping)
New Delhi , the 15th September,2008 5. O. 2690. -In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Merchant Shipping Act , 1958 (44 of 1958) read with Rule 4 of the National Shipping Board Rules, 1960 and in continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number dated 1-9-2008, the Central Government hereby notifies the names of the following six Members of the National Shipping Board for a period of two years with effect from 1st September ,2008-
1. Shri S.Hazara, Chairman & Managing Director, Shipping Corporation of India Ltd.
2. Shri Atul Agarwal , Joint Managing Director, Mercator Lines Ltd.
3. Shri Y. D. Khatau , Managing Director , Varun Shipping Co. Ltd.
4. Dr. Shanti Patel, President , National Union of Seafarers ofIndia.
5. Shri S. S. Khan , General Secretary, The Maritime Union ofIndia.
6. Dr. M.K. Pandhe , Vice President, Forward Seamen's Union of India .
5389
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ माश्विन 5, 1930
Names ofthe remaining six Members ofthe Boardwillbe notified in due course.
[P. No. SS- 18011 / 1 /2008-$1.
A. K. TEWARI , Dy. Secy .
नई दिल्ली, 18 सितम्बर , 2008
का, आ. 2691 , -राष्ट्रीय नौवहन बोर्ड नियमावली , 1960 के नियम 4 के साथ पठित वाणिज्य पोत परिवहन अधिनियम, 1958 ( 1958 का अधिनियम सं. 44 ) को धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकार प्रयुक्त करके केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा , । सितम्बर , 2008 से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए राष्ट्रीय नौवहन बोर्ड गठित करती है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित सदस्य शामिल होंगे :
1. कैप्टन पी. वी. के. मोहन , अध्यक्ष ।
2. अपर सचिव एवं वित्तीय सलाहकार, पोत परिवहन , सड़क परिवहन और राजमार्ग मंत्रालय ।
3. संयुक्त सचिव (नौवहन ) , पोत परिवहन विभমাণ । 4. संयुक्त सचिव, वाणिज्य विभाग ।
5. नेवल स्टॉफ के उप मुख्य ।
6. नौवहन महानिदेशक ।
7. निदेशक, राष्ट्रीय समुद्रीय संस्थान , चेन्नई ।
8. अध्यक्ष, कोचीन शिपयार्ड लिमिटेड ।
9. अध्यक्ष , एन्नौर पोर्ट लिमिटेड
10. प्रो. एन. एम. रामास्वामी , अध्यक्ष , प्रो. एन. एम. आरं अनुसंधान एवं विकास, कोयम्बटूर ।
शेष सदस्यों के नाम बाद में अधिसूचित कर दिए जाएंगे । [फा. सं. एस एस-1801 1 /1/2008- एस एल]
ए. के. तिवारी , उप सचिव NewDelhi , the 18th September, 2008 $. O. 2691.-In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Section 4 ofthe Merchant Shipping Act , 1958 (44 of 1958 ) read with Rule 4 of the National Shipping Board Rules, 1960 , the Central Government hereby establishes the National Shipping Board for a period of two years with effect from Ist September, 2008 consisting ofthe following Members:-
1. Capt . P.V.K. Mohan , Chainman.
2. Additional Secretary & Financial Adviser , Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways .
3. Joint Secretary (Shipping) , Department of Shipping.
4. Joint Secretary, Department of Commerce.
5390
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 /ASVINA 5 , 1930
5. Depur Chief of Naval Staff .
6. Director General of Shipping.
7. Director , National Maritime Academy, Chennai .
8. Chairman Corp Shipyard Limited.
9 Chairman. Panore Port Limited.
10. Prof N. M Kamaswamy . Chairman , Prof. N M.R. Found Sesearch and Development , Coimbatore , Naves of the maining Members of the Board will be notified in de course .
[ F.No. SS- 1801 1 / 1/2008- SL] A. K. TEWARI , Dy. Secy.
कोयला मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 22 सितम्बर , 2008
का. से 1592, -केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और स) अधिनियम , 1957( 1957 का 20 ) को धारा 7 की उपभारा ( 1 ) दवा अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1625 , तारीख 28 अप्रैल, 2006 द्वारा जो भारत के रा भाग ॥ खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ⅱ ) , तारीख 29 अप्रैल, 2006 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में गथा विनिर्दिष्ट अवश्थापन में ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकारों के अर्जन करने वो अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है :
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का , पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और महाराष्ट्र सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है , कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में यथा वर्णित 254.15 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) गा 628.03 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि और ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाने चाहिए । अनः अव केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है , कि अनुसूची में वर्णित 254.15 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 628.03 एकड़ (लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि में या उस पर के समस्त अधिकार अजित किए जाते हैं ।
इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. मी. ) जजेएम आर: 760-0508 तारीख 21 मई , 2008 कानिरक्षण कलेक्टर, चंद्रपुर पहागष्ट) के कार्यालय में ना कोयला नियंत्रक, । काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट. कोलकाता ( पिन -700001 ) के कार्यालय में या वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल एस्टेट , सिविल लाइन्स , नागपुर -440 ( N) । ( महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालन में किया जा सकता है ।
[PART 11-SFC. 3 ( ii ) )
अनुसूची
एकोणा- | ओपनकास्ट खंड माजरी क्षेत्र
जिला चंद्रपुर ( महाराष्ट्र)
( रेखांक सं. सी-१ ( ई ) / 111 /जेजेएमआर/ 760-0508 तारीख 21 मई , 2008)
समस्त अधिकारः
तहसील जिला
टिप्पणियों सं
क्षेत्र हेक्टर कम ग्राम का नाम
पटवारी सर्किल संख्या
वरोरी
1 . एकोणा ।।
चंद्रपुर 500.11 भाग 2
वरोरा
मार्डा 11
चंद्रपुर 40.65 भाग 3. वनोजा
वरांश चंद्रपुर 18.60 भाग 4.
वरोरा चंद्रपुर 144.79 भाग चरूर 10 (खटी)
कुल क्षेत्र : 254.15 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 628.03 एकड़ ( लगभग ) ग्राम एकोणा में अर्जित किए गए प्लॉट संख्यांकः 87, 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 97, 98/1 , 98/2, 98/3, 99 , 100 , 101 . 102, 103/1 , 103/2 , 104/1 , 104/2 , 104/3 , 105 , 106 , 107, 108 , 109 , 110/1 , 110/2 , 110/3 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116/1, 116/2 , सड़क( भाग ) ।
ग्राम मार्दा में अर्जित किए गए प्लॉट संख्यांकः
132 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140/1 , 140/2 , 140/3 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146, 147/1 , 147: 2 , 148/3 , 148/2 , 162 , 163 , सड़क( भाग ) ।
ग्राम बनोजा में अर्जित किए गए प्लॉट संख्यांकः
134 , 152 , 153 , 154, 155, 156 , सड़क( भाग ) ।
ग्राम चरूर ( खटी ) में अर्जित किए गए प्लॉट संख्यांकः 46, 47 , 48, 49, 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56/1 , 52 , 56/3 , 56/4, 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70, 71 , 72 , 73 , 74, 75 , 761 , 76/2 , 77 , 78/1 , 78/2 , 79 , 80 , 81/1 , 81/2, 81/3 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85: 1,85/2 , 86/ 1,86/2,86/ 3 , 464, 466 / 1,466/2 , 466/3 , 466/4 , 4663 , 4666, 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472, 473. 474. 475, 476 , 477. 478, 479, 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 , 485 , 486 , 487 , 488, 489, 490. 491,492 सड़क( भाग ) ।
सीमा वर्णनः
क-खः रेखा बिन्दु " क" से आरंभ होती है और प्लॉट संख्यांक 87. 89 की बाहरी सीमा के साथ - साथ ग्राम एकांणा सं [भाग ।। -खण्ड 3(ii) ]
होकर गुजरती है तथा ग्राम एकोणा और चरूर ( खटी ) कौ सम्मिलिप्त सीमा को पार करती है और प्लॉट संख्या 86/1 , की बाहरी सीमा के साथ जाती है और सड़क पार कर प्लॉट संख्यांक 56/1 , 36/2 , 56/3 , 56/4, 55, 54, 53 , 52, 51 , 50 , 46 की बाहरी सीमा के साथ जाती है और सड़क पार करती है, फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 491 , 492, 464, 466/5 की बाहरी सीमा के साथ जाती हुई बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।
ख-गः रेखा ग्राम चरूर ( स्वटी ) से होते हुए प्लॉट संख्यांक 466/5,466/2, 467,468 , 469 की बाहरी सीमा के साथ जाते हुए सड़क पार करती है फिर प्लॉट संख्या 471 की बाहरी सीमा के साथ जाती हुई ग्राम चरूर (खटी) और वनोजा की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है तथा ग्राम वनोजा के प्लॉट संख्यांक 156, 152 , 134 , की बाहरी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और सड़क पार करती है, फिर सड़क की बाहरी सीमा के साथ जाती हुई ग्राम पार्टी के प्लॉट संख्या 163 की बाहरी सीमा के साथ जाती हुई बिन्दु " ग" पर मिलती है ।
ग-कः रेखा प्लॉट संख्यांक 163 , 162, 147/1 , 147/2 , 148/2 , 140/3 , की बाहरी सीमा के साथ ग्राम मार्डा से होकर जाती है, सड़क पार करती है फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 137 , 132 की बाहरी सीमा के साथ जाती है और ग्राम मार्धा और एकोणा की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है , फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 116/2 , 116/1 , 103/2 , 103/1 , 98/3 , 98/1 , 97, 92, 91 , 87 , की बाहरी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।
[फा. संख्या. 43015/6/2005- पी. आर. आई.डब्ल्यू-। ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi , the 22nd September , 2008 S.O. 2692-.Whereas , by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal , number S. O. 1625 dated the 28th April , 2006 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in theGazette of India, Part- II , Section- 3 sub- section ( ii) , dated the 29th April , 2006, the Central Government gave notice ofits intention to acquire the lands and all rights in or over such lands in the locality specified in the Schedule appended to that notification;
And, whereas , the competent authority in pursuance of Section 8 of the said Act , has made his report to the Central Government;
5391
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
And, whereas , the Central Government after considering the report aforesaid and after consulting the Government of Maharashtra, is satisfied that the lands measuring 254.15 hectares (approximately) or 628.03 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule appended hereto , should be acquired;
Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section (1 ) ofSection 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957), the Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 254.15 hectares (approximately ) or 628.03 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule are hereby acquired.
The plan bearing number C-I ( E)/II/JJMR/760-0508 dated the 21st May , 2008 of the area covered by this notification , may be inspected in the office ofthe Collector, Chandrapur (Maharashtra ) or in the office of the Coal Controller, I , Council House Street, Kolkata (Pin 700001 ) or in the office ofthe Western Coalfields Limited (Revenuc Department) , Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440 001 (Maharashtra).
SCHEDULE
YEKONA - 1OPENCAST BLOCK MAJRIAREA
DISTRICT - CHANDRAPUR ( MAHARASHTRA ) (Plan number C- I ( E) / III / JJMR/ 760-0508 dated the 21st May,2008).
AllRights
Tahsil District Arca Remarks in Hoctares Sl . Name No. of village
Parwari circle No.
Part 01 Yekona 11 Warora Chandrapur 50.11
Part 02 Marda
Warora Chandrapur40.65
Part 03 Wanoja 11 WaroraChandrapur 18.60- 10 Warora Chandrapuг 144.79 Part 04 Charur (Khati)
Total arca: 254. 15 hectares (approximately) or628.03 acres (approximately) Plot numbers acquired in village Yckona:
87,88,89, 90,91 , 92, 97, 98/1 , 98/2 , 98/3 , 99, 100, 101 , 102, 103/1 , 103/2, 104/1 , 104/2 , 104/3, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110/1 , 110/2, 110/3, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115 , 116/1 , 116/2, Road (Part ).
5392
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 27,2008/ASVINA 5,1930
Plot numbers acquired in village Marda:
132, 137, 138, 139, 140/1 , 140/2, 140/3 , 141 , 142, 143 , 144, 145, 146, 147/1 , 147/2, 148/1 , 148/2 , 162, 163, Road (Part) .
Plot numbers acquired in village Wanoja:
134, 152, 153 , 154, 155, 1,56. Road (Part).
Plot numbers acquired in village Charur ( Khati ) :
46, 47, 48, 49, 50 , 51 , 52, 53 , 54, 55 , 56/1 , 56/2, 56/3 , 56/4, 57,58, 59, 60, 61 ,62, 63 , 64, 65, 66, 67.68, 69,70, 71.72, 73,74, 75, 76/1 , 76/2, 77, 78/1 , 78/2, 79, 80, 81/1 , 81 /2,81 /3 , 82,83,84, 85/1 , 85/2, 86/1 , 86/2,86/3, 464, 466/1, 466/2,466/3, 466/4,466'5 , 466/6,467,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,475, 476,477,478,479,480,481,482,483 , 484, 485, 486,487, 488, 489,490,491,492, Road (Part).
Boundary description :
A-B: Line starts from point 'A' through village Yekona and passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 87, 89 , and crosses common village boundary of villages Yekona and Charur (Khati) then proceeds through village Charur (Khati ) along the outer boundary of plot number 86: 1 . crosses road then proceeds along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 56/1 , 56/2, 56/3, 56/4 , 55, 54, 53 , 52, 51 , 50 , 46 and crosses road then proceeds along the outer boundary of plot numbers 491 , 492, 464, 466/5 and meets at point 'B' .
B- C:
[PART II SEC. 3 ) नई दिल्ली . 22 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2693- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कांयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोनला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसकं पश्चात्उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उम्र क्षेत्र में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है :
इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र का रेखांक सं. डी. जी./8736 तारीख 3 जुलाई , 20१०५ का निरीक्षण मुख्य महाप्रबंधक (गवेषण प्रभाग ) , सेन्ट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीट्यूट गोन्डवाना प्लेस , कॉके रोड, राँची या कोयला नियंत्रक , । , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता-700 001 के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर रायगढ़ , छत्तीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषण प्रभाग ) . सेन्ट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिनाइन इंस्टीट्यूट गोंडवाना प्लेस , कॉके रोड, राँची को भेजेगें ।
अनुमुची
स्यांग साउथ ब्लॉक , मांद रायगढ़ , कोयला क्षेत्र जिला- रायगढ़ , छत्तीसगढ़
L रेखांक में. डीजी/8736 तारीख 3 जुलाई, 2008
1 ग्रा. सं.
क्रम ग्राम सं
थाना तहसील
जिला क्षेत्रफल क्षेत्रफल टिप्पणी एकड़ हेक्टर में
40) भाग 1 . स्यांग कोरबा 524500 रायगढ़ 1011
94 भाग
रायगढ़ 232
2. डेगुरडीह
करताला 523.500
3. शुटमा
कोरबा 430KN) रायगढ़ 345 140 भाग
1030 भाग 4. सीमकेडा
Line passes through village Charur ( Khati ) along the outer boundary of plot numbers 466/5, 466/2. 467, 468, 469 crosses road then procceds along the outer boundary of plot nuinber 471 , crosses common village boundary of villages Charur ( Khati ) and Wanoja, then proceeds through village Wanoja along the outer boundary of plot numbers 156 , 152, 134, crosses road and proceeds along the outer boundary of road in village Wanoja , then proceeds through village Marda along the outer boundary of plot number 163 and meets at point 'C'.
कोरबा 5244KM) रायगढ़ 2545
5. एलोग
कोरबा
रायगढ़ 22
6. वनक्षेत्र
कोरबा
313 भाग
ग्रयगढ़ 774
4930
कुल
1995
( लगभग) ( लगभग )
सीमा विवरण
C-D: Line passes through village Marda along with theouterboundary of plot numbers 163 , 162. 147/1 , 147/2 , 148/2 , 140/3 , crosses road then proceeds along the outer boundary of plot numbers 137 . 132, crosses common village boundary of villages Marda and Yekona then proceeds along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 116/2, 116/1 , 103/2 , 103/1 . 98/3 , 98/1 , 97, 92, 91 , 87. and meets at starting pointA .
[F. No. 43015/6/2005 - PRIW - 1 ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy .
क-ख रेखा वन क्षेत्र में ' क ' बिन्दु से आरंभ होती है और स्यांग ग्राम के मध्य भाग से गुजरती हुई ' ख' बिन्दु पर मिलती है । [ भाग []-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
ख-ग रेखा देगुरडीह ग्राम के मध्य भाग से गुजरती हुई शुदमा गाँव के पश्चिमी भाग में ' ग' बिन्दु पर मिलती है । ग-भ रेखा सौमकेडा गाँव के दक्षिण पूर्वी भाग की ओर मुड़कर एलोग ग्राम के कोने पर बिन्दु ' घ ' पर मिलती है । ম- रेखा मुद्दती हुई जंगल की सीमा के कोने पर बिन्दु ' ङ ' पर मिलती है ।
ङ-क रेखा वन से गुजरती है और वन के विन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।
[फा. संख्या, 43015/ 11 /2008-पी.आर.आई.डब्ल्यू- [ ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 22nd September, 2008 S.O. 2693 -Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;
5393
भारत का राज्जपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisitions and Development ) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957 ) (herein after referred to as the said Act), the Central Government herebygives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;
The plan mumber DG/8736 dated the 3rd July, 2008 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected at theoffice ofChiefGeneral Manager ( Exploration Division), Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata or at the office ofthe District Collector, Raigarh , Chhattisgarh .
All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred in sub -section (7) of Section 13 ofthe said Act to the Chief General Manager ( Exploration Division ) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Gondwana Place, Kanke Road , Ranchi within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification.
SCHEDULE
SAYANG SOUTH BLOCK, MAND RAIGARH COALFIELD
DISTRICT RAIGARH, CHHATISGARH
Plan bearing number DG/8736 dated the 3rd July, 2008 SL VIL No.
Thana Tehsil
VIIL No.
1 SAYANG
KORBA
524500 2 DEGURDIH
523500
KARTALA
43000 3 SHUDΜΑ
KORBA
SIMKEDA
KORBA
524000 4
5 ELOG
KORBA
6 FOREST
KORBA
TOTAL
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
A-B
Remarks
District
Area in Acres
Area in Hectares
RAIGARH
409
Part 1011
RAIGARH
232
94
Part
RAIGARH
346
Part
140
2545
RAIGARH
Part
1030
RAIGARH
22
9
774
RAIGARH
313
Part
1995
4930 (approximately)
(approximately) The line start at point ' A' in the forest and passes through middle part of Sayang village and meets point 'B ' .
B-C The line passes through middle part of village Dengurdih and meets point ' C' in the western part of village Shudma.
C-D The line turned towards South Eastern part of village Simkeda and meets point ' D ' on the edge of village Elog.
D-A The line turn and meet point ' E' at the edge af forest boundary.
E-A The line passes through in the forest and meets point ' A' in the forest .
[F. No. 43015/11/2008 -PRIW - 1 ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.
5394
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 /ASVINA 5 , 1930
नई दिल्ली, 22 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2694- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 को उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस क्षेत्र में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;
इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र का रेखांक सं. डी. जी./8737 तारीख 3 जुलाई, 08 का निरीक्षण मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषण प्रभाग ) , सेन्ट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीट्यूट गोंडवाना प्लेस , कांके रोड , राँची या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , कार्डौंसल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता-700001 के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर रायगढ़ , छत्तीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है । इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषण प्रभाग ) , सेन्ट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीट्यूट गोंडवाना प्लेस , कांके रोड, राँची को भेजेंगे ।
अनुसूची
चिरा नार्थ वेस्ट ब्लाक , मांद रायगढ़ कोयला क्षेत्र जिला- रायगढ़, छत्तीसगढ़
रेखांक सं. डीजी/8737 तारीख 3 जुलाई , 2008
ग्रा. सं. जिला
क्रम ग्राम सं.
थाना तहसील
एकड़
क्षेत्रफल क्षेत्रफल टिप्पणी हेक्टर में कोरबा
1. एलोग
रायगढ़ 327.35
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] ग-घ रेखा वन से गुजरती हुई सुदमा एवं चिरा ग्राम के मध्य भाग से पार होकर एलोग ग्राम के बिन्दु ' घ' पर मिलती है । घ-क रेखा मुड़कर एलांग ग्राम के उत्तरी सिरे पर बिन्दु ' क' पर मिलती है ।
[फा. संख्या. 4.3015/ 12/2008 - पी. आर. आई. डब्ल्यू-[ ] एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 22nd September , 2008 S.O 2694-- whereas . it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in thelocality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisitions and Development ) Act . , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Govemment hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;
The plan number DG/8737 dated the 3rd July,2008 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected at the office ofChief General Manager ( Exploration Division ) . Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street , Kolkata or at the office ofthe District Collector , Raigarh , Chattisgarh .
All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub - section ( 7 ) of Section 13 of the said Act to the Chief General Manager ( Exploration Division) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute. Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, Ranchi within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification .
SIFOCLE
CHIRA NORTIL WEST BLOCK. MAND RAIGARIL COALFIELD . DISTRICI RAIGAREL , CHHATISGARIT
Plan mumber DG/8737 dated the r저 Jul 2008
132.47 भाग
2. चिरा कोरबा
रायगढ़ [ 2.59.8 ]
Sl . Vill .
District Area Area Remarks
509.84 भाग
3. सुदमा केरबा 524300 रायगढ़ 2529.54
No.
in
Thana Vill . Tehsil E. N
jn
1023.70 भाग
4. टेंगरीभार कोरबा
रायगढ़ 902.70
Acres lectures Korba
365 भाग
5. बोरो कोरबा 321600 रायगढ़ 486.107
13247 Part
Harpal 327 35
1 Eng
2 Chira Korba
Part
Rigarh 1259.81 309.84
190.70 भाग
धर्मजयगर
6. सीमाकेडा कोरबा
20,107 ग
रायगढ़ 49.60
कोरबा
7. वनक्षेत्र
रायगढ़ 148.79
Korba 52430m Rauth 2.529.3.1 1023.70 Part 3 Sudina
4 Tegrimar Korba
902 70 365
Ragarl:
5 Boro Korba 321600R
486.07 196.71 Dharanijaigar
60.21 भा
5703.86 2308.00 कुल
( लगभग ) ( लगभग) सीमा विवरण
क-ख रेखा एलांग ग्राम के ' क ' बिन्दु से शुरू होकर और चिरा के दक्षिण भाग , सुदा ग्राम के मध्य भाग से गुजरती है । रेखा बोरा ग्राम के दक्षिण पश्चिमी भाग से गुजरती हुई वन क्षेत्र के ' ग' बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
20 ( 1? Part 6 Simkeda Korba
Rugch 49 ili
7 Forest Korha
Part
60 21
kaigal: 148.79
TOTAL
303 86 2308,00
(approx - appros- mately imatelyj BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
A-B The line start at pont A' in village Blog and passes through sophern part of Chira , middic part Shudima voflage .
[ भाग - खण्ड ( ii) ]
B-C The line passes through south-western part of villageBoro and meets point ' c ' in the forest area.
C-D The line crossed the forest, meddle part of Shudma and Chira village and meets point 'D' in thevillageBlog.
D-A The line tums and meets point 'A' at the Northern odge ofthe villageElog.
[File No.43015/12/2008-PRIW- I] M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 22 सितम्बर , 2008
का, आ. 2695, -केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस क्षेत्र में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;
इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र का रेखांक सं. डी. जी. /08735 तारीख 3 जुलाई, 08 का निरीक्षण मुख्य महा- प्रबंधक ( गवेषणा प्रभाग ) , सेन्ट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीट्यूट गोन्डवाना प्लेस, कांके रोड, राँची या कोयला नियंत्रक का कार्यालय , । , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर रायगढ़, छत्तीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में किया आ सकता है । इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नष्ये दिन के भीतर मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषणा प्रभाग ) , सेन्ट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीट्यूट गोंडवाना प्लेस , कांके रोड , राँची को भेजेंगे।
अनुसूची स्यांग नार्थ खण्ड, मांद रायगढ़ कोयला क्षेत्र जिला- रायगढ़, छत्तीसगढ़
ग्रा. सं जिला
टिप्पणियां क्रम ग्राम सं
थाना तहसील
क्षेत्रफल क्षेत्रफरन एकड़ हेक्टर में में
पाग
573.34 232.84 1. चिरडुट कोरवा $24400 रायगढ़
1349.09 545.97 2. स्यांग कोरबा 524900 रायगढ़
भाग
433.56 कोरबा
3. सरस्म
रायगढ़ 1071.33
525200
देवा
भाग
0.03 4. डेंगुरडीह
523500 रायगढ़ 4.40
कोरबा करताना
भाग
285.00 5. वनक्षेत्र
रायगढ़ 704.29
कोरना+ धर्मजैगढ़ क्षेत्र
3706.45 (लगभग)
1500.00 (लगभग) 346701/08-3
5395
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
सीमा विवरण
क- ख रेखा (लाइन ) जंगल के ' क ' बिन्दु से शुरू होती है और चिरहुट ग्राम के मध्य भाग से गुजरती हुई सरसा देवा ग्राम में" ख " बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
ख-ग रेखा (लाइन ) सरसा देवा ग्राम के पश्चिमी भाग से गुजरती है और जंगल में " ग " बिन्दु पर मिलती है । ग-घ रेखा सरसा देवा और स्यांग ग्राम को पार करके घूमती है और कोसरी जंगल के किनारे पर बिन्दु ' घ' पर मिलती है । घ-क रेखा बिन्दु ' क' पर जंगल में ही वापस मिल जाती है । [फा. संख्या. 43015 / 10/2008- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ] एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 22nd September, 2008 S.O. 2695.-whereas , it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisitions and Development ) Act . 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;
The plan bearing number DG/8735 dated the 3rd July, 2008 ofthe area covered by this notification can be inspocied atthe office ofChief General Manager (Exploration Division). Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Place, Kanke Road , Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata or at the office oftheDistrict Collector, Raigarh, Chattisgarh.
All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps, charts and other documents referred in sub -section (7) of Section 13 ofthe said Act to the Chief General Manager ( Exploration Division) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Gondwana Place , Kanke Road , Ranchi within ninetydays from the date of publication of this notification .
SCHEDULE
SAYANG NORTH BLOCK, MAND RAIGARIL COALFIELD DISTRICT RAIGARH , CHHATISGARH
Planbearing number DG / 8735 dated the 3rd July 2008
Recmaks
District
SI . Vill
Area in
No.
No.
Thana Vill Telesil
Area Apres Hectares
232 84 Korba
I Charhut
573.34
524400 Raigarı
545,97 Korba
1.349.09
2 Sayang
5246-00 Raigarh
Parl
473 56
1071 33
521200 Rpgarh
3 Sarsadewa Korba
D
4
523500 Raigarh 4.40
Deandils Korbal
Kartala
Part
285DD
704 19
5 Forest
Raigarh
Korba+ Pleranjai
3706 45 15011,00 TOTAL
( Арх
(Approx.
5396
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27,2008/ASVINA 5 ,1930
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
A-B The line start at point ' A' in the forest and passes through middle part of Chirhut village and meets point ' B' in the village Sarsadeva.
B-C The line passes through western part of village Sarsadeva and meets point 'C' in the forest.
C-D The line turned and the forest Sarsadeva and Sayang village crossed and meets point ' D ' on the edge of forest Kosiari .
D -A The line turn and meet point'A' gain in the forest . [File No.43015 / 10 /2008- PRIW - IJ M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy, उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय (उपभोक्ता मामले विधाग ) भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2696, - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं: -
अनुसूधी
क्रम
स्थापित निधि स्थापित भारतीय संख्या मानक ( को) की सं. वर्ष और शीर्षक
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
( 1 )
(2)
(3)
(4) 1 आईएस 777 :2008 आईएस 6773: 1978 31 जुलाई , 2008 उलाई में प्रयुक्त सांडियम सिलिकेट विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों; नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालगों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराचाद . जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में. बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध है ।
[संदर्भ: एमटीडी ( 4:1-31 | डा. ( श्रीमति ) स्नेह भाटला. वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी ) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS . FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Departament of Consumer Affairs) BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 4th September , 2008
S.O. 2696.-In pursuance of clanse ( h ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules. 1987 . the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
[ PART II-SEC.3 ( ii)]
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards Established
Date of Estab- lished
No. & Year of Indian Standards, if any. Supersedet by the New Indian Standard (2)
( 1)
(3)
(4)
IS6773 :1978 31 July, 2008 1 IS6773:2008 Sodium silicate for use in foundries- Specification (second revision )
Copy of the this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhawan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkatta , Chandigarh . Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad. Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur. Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram,
[ Ref. MTD 14/1-311 Dr.(Mrs.) SNEH BHATIA, Scientist F & Head (Mct Engg. ) नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का,आ. 2697, भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम ? के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय पानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया किये गये है :
अनुसूची
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम संशोधित भारतीय संख्य । मानक ( कों ) की सं. वर्ष और शीर्षक
(2)
(1)
(41
संशाधनसंख्या 28 अगस्त 2008
2. दिसम्बर 2003
आईएस 1536: 20 ) जल, गैस एवं मल जल के लिए अपकेन्द्रों ढलवां ( स्पन ) लोहे के दाब पाइप- विशिष्टि (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)
आईएस 1536 :2001 जल , गैस एवं मल संशोधन संख्या १४ अगस्त , 2008 जल के लिए अपकंन्द्री ढलवा ( स्पन ) लोहे के दाब पाइप विशिष्टि ( चर्चाधा पुनरीक्षण )
इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक की प्रतियों भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , ५ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यान्तयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता चण्डीगए चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयं : अहमदावाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूर्ण तथा तिरूवनान्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ: एमटीडी 6/टी-10 ] डा. (श्रीमति ) स्नेह भाटला, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) NewDelhi , the4th September , 2008 S. O. 2697.In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau ofIndian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
No. & Year of the No. & Year ofthe
amendment
SI. No. Indian Standard( s)
amendment( s)
Date from which the amendment shall have effect (1) (2)
(3)
(4) 1. IS 1536:2001
Amendment 28August 2008
No.2
Centrifugally
December 2003
cast (spun) iron pressure pipes for wate, gas and sewage( fourth revision)
2. IS 1536:2001
Amendment 28 August2008
No.3
Contrifugally
cast (spun) iron July2008
pressure pipes for wate,gas and sewage(fourth revision)
Copy of the this Standard is available for sale with theBureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkatta, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. MTD 6/T- 10] Dr. (Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist' F' &
Head(Met Engg. ) नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2698.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम ? के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक म्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिये गये यानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया किये गये है :-
अनुसूची
क्रम संशोधित भारतीय
संशोधन संशोधन लागू
की संख्या और वर्ष होने की तिथि संख्या मानक ( कों ) की सं.
वर्ष और शीर्षक
1.
संशोधन संख्या 4, 25 अगस्त , 2008 खोखले इस्पात के जुलाई, 2008
आईएस 4923: 1997 खंड संरचनात्मक प्रयोग
के लिए- विशिष्टि
(दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)
5397
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल मुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद. जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भः एमटीडी 10/दी-30] डा. ( श्रीपति) स्नेह पाटला , वैज्ञानिक एक एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) NewDelhi , the 4th September , 2008 S.O. 698.-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule (1 ) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
No. & Year of the Dare from Sl . No. & Year of the
amendmeni
No. Indian Standard(s)
amendnment (s)
which the armeniant shall have etfect 1. IS 4923: 1997
25 August 2008
Amendment
Hollow steel
No.4
sections for structuraj July. 2008
use-Specification
(second revision )
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Ollices: New Delhi, Kolkatta, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Paina, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. MTD 19/1-301 Dr. ( Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist F' & Head( Met Engg. ) नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2699.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम ? के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:
अनुसूची
क्रम स्थापित भारतीय नये भारतीय मानक
स्थापित
तिथि संख्या मानक (कॉ ) की सं. द्वारा अतिक्रमित
वर्ष और शीर्षक भारतीय मानक
अथवा मानकों, यदिकोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष
( 3 )
(4) (1) (2)
14553 :1998 31 जुलाई 2008 1. आईएस 14553 :2008 स्वचल वाहन- संपीड़ित 5398
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ ASVINA 5. 1930
( 3)
(1) ( 2;
(1) दहन ई नियुक्त वाहनों से निष्कासित गैस की अपायंता ( धुआओं ) को मापन का उपकरण ਰਿਆਦ ( ਆ
2. आई एस 15783 :2008 10289 : 1982 312008 सड़क चालन दो और 10841.1984 और
तीन पीसंमोटर 13493:1992
क वाहनों
नियंत्रनवर विशिष्ट
3.
[ PART 150.3 (ii ) | ( 1 ) (2)
2 IS 15783: 2008
10289:1982. 31 July 2938
108-11 :1981
and 1.5143 : 1997
Road vehicles- Brake cormellevers for two and thice whelled motor vehicles- Sperilication
3.
31 July 2008 IS 15802 :20MIN Automotive vehicles-- Windscreen wipoic system for 4 wheelers other than MM category ofvehicles Requirements
31 जुलाई 2018
भाई एस 15502: 2 אמנ विदल नाहन शुभ । श्रेणी के बाहनों को छोड़ ऊर चार पहिया वाहनों
इन भनजनक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक न्यूगे , मानक भवन, 9, बहादुरगाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिली , कोलकःग, चण्डीगढ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों, अहमदावाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पुर्ण तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ: टी ई डी जो -16 ] राकेश कुमार, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( ती ई डी ) New Delhi , the 16th September. 2008 S. O. 2699. -In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - role ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against cach:
SCHEDULE
SI . No Year & Title of No. & Year of
Date No. the Indian Standards Indian Standards,
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan . 9,Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg. New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi . Kolkatta Chandigarh. Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices Ahmedabad . Banglore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guswahani , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune . Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref. TED G-16] RAKESH KUMAR, Scientist & Theat ( Transport ing नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर , 200x
का.आ. 2700. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ख के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय पानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया हैं वह स्थापित हो गये है।
अनुसूची
क्रम स्थापित भारताय नयं भारतीय गानकः
પત
तिथि संख्या मानक ( कों ) कां ग.
वर्ष और शोषक
द्वारा अतिक्रमिन भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, दि कांई हो. की गब्दा और वर्ष
नहीं
1. आइएस 15788 :2008
जुलाई 2008 मत्स्य 'जाल- जाल का माइन
Established
Established
if any.
Superseded by
the New Indian Standard
( 1 ) (21
(3 )
1 IS 1455.1 2008
14553:1998
ज्ञात करने के लिये परीक्षण पद्धति जाल का छिद्र
अब यह भारतीय मानक बिक्री के लिए उपलब्ध होगा ।
31July 2008
Automotive vehicles ---
Apparatus for the opanty ( Smokel of exhaust gas fromn vehicles equipped with compressi011 ignition engine Specification
(First Revision )
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूग , के मुख्यालय मानक भवन , ५ , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, और इसकं क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई , मुम्वई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलोर . भोपाल, भुबनेश्वर , कांथम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर . नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा दिहननन्तापुरम में बिक्री हंतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[ संदर्भः टीएक्सडी जो 25 ] पी. भटनागर, वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख ( टीएक्सडी ) [ भागः ll- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi, the 19th September, 2008 S.O. 2700.-In pursuance ofclause (b) of sub-rule (1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of. Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Date of SI . No, andYear of No.& Year of
Established
Indian Standard,
No. the Indian Standards Established
ifany,
Superseded by theNew Indian Standard
Nil
1. IS 15788:2008
July2008 Fishing Nets- method
of Test for the Determination of Mesh Size-
Opening ofMesh
Henceforth , this standard will be available for sale .
Copy of the this Standard is available for sale with H.Q. at Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and its Regional Offices at New Delhi , Kolkatta , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices at Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.
5399
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5, 1930
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , के मुख्ययालय , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , और इसके क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , मुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैद्राबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ: टीएक्सडी/जी-25] पी. भटनागर, वैज्ञानिक ' ई' एवं प्रमुख (टीएक्सडी) NewDelhi , the 19th September , 2008 S.O. 2701-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule (1) of Rule7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Date of No. & Year of
St.
No. & Year of
Established the Indian Standards Indian Standards,
No.
Established
ifany.
Supersededby
the New Indian
[Ref. TXD/G-25 ]
P. BHATNAGAR , Scientist ' E ' & Head (Textiles) नई दिल्ली, 19 सितम्बर , 2008
का, आ. 2701 ,-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक व्यूरो एतद्दद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विषरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है: -
अनुसूची
स्थापित
नये भारतीय मानक स्थापित भारतीय
तिथि क्रम संख्या मानक की सं.
द्वारा अतिक्रमित
भारतीय मानक
वर्ष और शीर्षक
यदिकोई हो, की
संख्या और वर्ष
जून 2008 1. आईएस 15768:2008 नहीं
वस्त्रादि- व्यवसायिक
सोफासाजी के लिए फर्नीचर की अग्नि
अवरोधकता विशिष्टि
अब यह भारतीय मानक बिक्री के लिए उपलब्ध होगा ।
Standard
Nil
IS 15768 : 2008
June 2008 L.
Textiles Resistance
to Ignition of
Upholstered
Composites used
For Non-Domestic
Fumiture-Specification
sale. Henceforth , this standard will be available for Copy of the this Standard is available for sale with H.Q. at Bureau of Indian Standards , Manalk Bhavan , 9. Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and its Regional Offices at New Delhi , Kolkatta , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices at Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune . Thiruvananthapигат.
[Ref. TXD/G -25] P. BHATNAGAR, Scientist ' E' & Head ( Textiles) 5400
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ASVINA 5, 1930
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2782.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में बाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक क्रूड आयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाएः
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जुन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री अरविन्द खरे, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , वाडीनार-बीना क्रूड आयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड , 8/5 , वैशाली नानाखेडा बस स्टेण्ड के पास , उज्जैन 456010 ( मध्यप्रदेश) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश
तहसील राघौगढ़
जिला गुना
ग्राम का नाम
सर्व नबर
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
3
1
2
4
1519
D 334
1 . कजालिया
135
2. नलखेम
0031
[फर. सं. आर-31015/20/2008- ओ.आर ॥ ]
ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas
New Delhi, the 24th September, 2008
S. O. 2702.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of Crude Oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited ;
* And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;
[भाग II- खणा (ii) ]
3401 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 27, 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Arvind Khare, Competent Authority, Vadinar -Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project , Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, 8/S " Vaishali", Near Nanakheda Bus Stand , Ujjain -456 010 (Madhya Pradesh) .
SCHEDULE
TEHSIL : RAGHOGARH DISTRICT : GUNA STATE : MADHYA PRADESH S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA IN HECTARE 1
2
3
4
KAJALIVA
1.
161 मिन
135
0.334 0.031
2 NALKHEDA
[No. R-31015/20/2006-O.R.-II) A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2703.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाढीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक क्रूड आयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए:
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50 ) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री अरविन्द खरे, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , वाडीनार- बीना क्रूड आयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत ओमान रिफाइन्रीज लिमिटेड , 8/5 , वैशाली नानाखेडा बस स्टेण्ड के पास , उज्जैन 456010 ( मध्यप्रदेश) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
राव देश
जिला: उज्जैन
लासील : हराना
क्षेत्रपाल हेक्टेवर में
प्राम का नाम
4
3
1 2
1. लामाखेड़ी
0.05
393
0.014
371
2. रुपाखेड़ी
0.13
149
3. बुखारी
[फा. सं. आर-31015/22/2008 - ओ.आर- ॥ ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव 5402
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27, 2008/ ASVINA 5 , 1930
PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2008
S. O. 2703. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of Crude Oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right ofuser in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Arvind Khare , Coinpetent Authority, Vadinar-Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project , Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, 8/5 "Vaishali" , Near Nanakheda Bus Stand, Ujjain -456 010 ( Madhya Pradesh) .
SCHEDULE
TEHSIL : TARANA
DISTRICT : UJJAIN
STATE : MADHYA PRADESH S.No.
SURVEY NO .
AREA IN HECTARE NAME OF VILLAGE
3
1
2
4
1. LALAKHEDI
393
0.05
371
0.014 RUPAKHEDI
2 .
149
0.13 3. BUKHARI
[No. R- 31015/22/2008- O.R. - II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2704.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक क्रूड आयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री अरविन्द खरे , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , वाडीनार- बीना क्रूड आयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड , 8/5 , वैशाली नानाखेडा बस स्टेण्ड के पास , उज्जैन 456010 (मध्यप्रदेश) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 5403 [ भाग II- खष्ठ 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
अनुसूची
राज्य: मध्यानवेश
राहतील: मो. बडोदिया
जिना: ज्ञाणांपुर
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सर्वे मंबर
प्राम का नाम
3
2
1
0.05
162
1. सागकिया
[फा. सं . आर-31015/23/2008 - ओ.आर-11 ]
ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2008
S.O. 2704,-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of Crude Oil from Vadinar in the State ofGujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed tobe laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of1962), the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Arvind Khare , Competent Authority, Vadinar-Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project, Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, 8/5 " Vaishali" , Near Nanakheda Bus Stand, Ujjain -456 010 ( Madhya Pradesh) .
SCHEDULE
STATE : M.P.
DISTRICT : SHAJAPUR
TEHSIL : MO , BADODIYA
AREA IN HECTARE
SURVEY NO.
NAME OF VILLAGE
S.No.
4
2
3
1
0.05
1. SAGADIYA
162
[No. R- 31015/23/2008-O.R.-II] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy. 3467G1/08-4 3404
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ASVINA 5, 1930
[PART SEC. 3 (ii )]
नई दिल्ली , 24 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2705.. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित्त में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में चाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक क्रूड आयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50 ) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचनां से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री अरविन्द खरे , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , वाडीनार-बीना क्रूड आयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड , 8/5 , वैशाली नानाखेडा बस स्टेण्ड के पास , उज्जैन 456010 ( मध्यप्रदेश) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला: प्यार
तहसील : बदनावर
राज्य : मध्यप्रदेश
सर्वे नंबर
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
য়াম কা সাম
4
3
1 2
0.78
1. दौत्र्या
670 p
0.08
829
0.06
830
0.09
1282
0.02
1319/2
0.20
1319/3
16
0.02
2 बखतपुरा
18
0.08
0.10
321
0.17
23
3. टीटीपाड़ा
0.26
729/2
4. संदेला
0.04
1193/1
5. तिलगारा
1.85
569
6. मुल्थान
910
0.23
0.34
1286
0.21
2596/2
573
0.03
7. काछीबड़ौदा
45
0.05
8. करोदा
0.08
56/3
[ फा, सं . आर-31015/13/2004- ओ, आर- || ]
ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव 5405 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5, 1930
[भाग - खण्ड 3( ii ) ] .
NewDelhi , the 24th September, 2008
S.O. 2785-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of Crude Oil from Vadinar in the State ofGujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline isproposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Arvind Khare, Competent Authority, Vadinar-Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project, Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, 8/5 "Vaishali" , Near Nanakheda Bus Stand , Ujjain -456 010 (Madhya Pradesh).
SCHEDULE
STATE : MADHYA PRADESH
DISTRICT : DHAR
TEHSIL : BADNAWAR
AREA IN HECTARE
SURVEY NO .
8.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
4
3
2
1
0.78
670P
1. DOTRIYA
0.08
829
0.06
830
1282
0.09
0.02
1319/2
0.20
1319/3
0.02
16
2. BAKHATPURA
18
0.08
0.10
321
0.17
23
TITIPADA
3 .
0.26
729/2
4. SANDLA
0.04
1193/1
5. TILGARA
1.85
569
6. MULTHAN
910
0.23
0.34
1286
0.21
2596/2
673
0.03
7. KHACCHI BARODA
0.20
678
45
0.05
8. KARODA
0.08
56/3
[No. R-31015/13/2004-O.R. - II]
A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
5406
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ ASVINA 5 , 1930
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2706.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक क्रूड आयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए:
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है . उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाएः
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है।
कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रत्तियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री अरविन्द खरे , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , वाडीनार- बीना क्रूड आयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड , 8/5 , वैशाली नानाखेडा बस स्टेण्ड के पास , उज्जैन 456010 ( मध्यप्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश
जिला: झाबुआ
तहसील : पेटलावद
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सर्वे नंबर
4
3
द्वान का नाग 2
1
0.07
902
1 . झाब्रलिया
0.07
4
2. सोयला
0.04
326
3. आाल स्पाखेडी
0.09
329
0.63
99
सेजलिया
0.14
107
0.10
552
5.
0.23
78
6. नाजपुरस
0.15
285
0.07
286
[ पन , सं. आर -31015/ 17/2008 - ओ.आर-1 ] 5407 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27, 2008/ आश्विन 5, 1930
[ भाग- खण्ड ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2008
S.O. 2706 Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of Crude Oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Arvind Khare, Competent Authority, Vadinar- Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project, Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, 8/5 " Vaishali " , Near Nanakheda Bus Stand , Ujjain -456 010 (Madhya Pradesh) .
SCHEDULE
STATE : MADHYA PRADESH
DISTRICT : JHABUVA
TEHSIL: PETLAWAD
AREA IN HECTARE
SURVEY NO .
S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
4
3
2
1
0.07
902
1. ZHABLIYA
0.07
4
2. SOYALA
0.04
326
ALISIYA KHED !
3.
0.09
329
0.63
99
SEJALIYA
4.
0.14
107
0.1
552
BEGANBARDI
5.
0.23
78
6. LALPURA
0.15
285
0.07
288
[No. R-31015/17/2008- O.R. -IIJ A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
5408
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ASVINA 5 , 1930
[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली , 24 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2707.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में बाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक क्रूड आयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है।
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपन्त्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री अरविन्द खरे , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , वाडीनार- बीना क्रूड आयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड, 8/5, वैशाली नानाखेडा बस स्टेण्ड के पास , उज्जैन 456010 (मध्यप्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश
जिला: उज्जैन
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सबै नंबर
ग्राम का माम
4
3
1 2
430
0.06
1. रामाबालोदा
0.10
392
2 सुरजा ठोड़ी
0.06
508
004
529
[पंत्र. सं. आर -31015 / 18 / 2008 - ओ.आर- ।। ]
ए.गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 24th September, 2008
S. O. 2707.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of Crude Oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
[भाग -खष्ठ 3(ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 27, 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
5409 Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Arvind Khare, Competent Authority, Vadinar -Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project, Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, 8/5 "Vaishali", Near Nanakheda Bus Stand, Ujjain -456 010 (Madhya Pradesh) .
SCHEDULE
TEHSIL : NAGDA DISTRICT : UJJAIN
STATE : MADHYA PRADESH
SURVEY NO .
AREA IN HECTARE S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
2
3
4 1
430
0.06 1. RAMABALODA
0.10
392
2 SURJAKHEDI
0.06
506
529
0.04
[No. R-31015/18/2008-0.R. -II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2708.- जबकि पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार की निम्नलिखित अनुसूची में, दि. 9.11.99 की 3280 , दि. 24.12.99की 3673 , दि. 30.03.2000 की 791 और दि.10.07.2001 की 1624 अधिसूचनाओं के माध्यम से केंद्र सरकार निदेशित करता है कि सभी प्रकार के भार से मुक्त होकर मोटर स्पिरिट, सुपीरियर किरासिन और हाई स्पीड डीजल के परिवहन हेतु पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए केरल राज्य के इरिम्पनम, कोच्चिमें भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के इरिम्पनम संस्थापना से तमिलनाडु राज्य के करूर तक उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार पेट्रोनेट सीसीके लिमिटेड में निहित है और मेसर्स पेट्रोनेट सीसीके लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाया जाना चाहिए ;
और जबकि पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन) नियम, 1963 के स्पष्टीकरण 1 के अधीन अपेक्षित जैसे , पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना , दिनांक 11,06,2004 कर एस.ओ. 1427 द्वारा केंद्र सरकार, दिनांक 15.12.2002 को केरल राज्य में पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के बाद प्रचालन की समापन तिथि घोषित की है ;
अब , मेसर्स भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड को उक्त भूमि से उपयोग के अधिकार से बीपीसीएल कोच्चि रिफ़ाइनरी से नेडुम्बाश्शेरी स्थित कोथिन अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विमानपत्तन तक एटीएफ उत्पाद के परिवहन के लिए एटीएफ पाइपलाइन बिछाने का इरादा है ;
और जबकि कोचिन कोयम्बत्तूर - करूर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए काम में लाए उपयोग के अधिकार में ही एटीएफ पाइपलाइन बिछाने को भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड को अनुमति देने में पेट्रोनेट सीसीके लिमिटेड को कोई आत नहीं है ;
और जबकि केंद्र सरकार को अनुरोध पर विचार किए जाने पर इस पर विश्वास है कि कोच्चि रिफाइनरी से कोचिन अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विमानपत्तन तक एटीएफ उत्पाद के परिवहन के लिए एटीएफ पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त भूमि अपेक्षित है ;
और आगे , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की धारा (4) द्वारा प्राप्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए केंद्र सरकार एतद्वारा निदेश देता है कि कोच्चि रिफ़ाइनरी से कोचिन अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विमानपत्तन तक एटीएफ उत्पाद के परिवहन के लिए एटीएफ पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार को काम में ला सकता है और भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाएंगे ;
5410
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 27, 2008/ASVINA 5, 1930
(PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
अनुसूची
एस ओ नं एवं तिथि
गाँव कानाम
जिला
राज्य
ताल्लुक्क
क्रम सं.
1
2
3
4
5
6 1 दि. 9.11.99का 3280
पारक्कडवु (ब्लॉक नं.5)
केरल
एरणाकुलम
आलुवा
घारक्कउयु (ब्लॉक नं.8 )
केरल
एणाकुलम
आलुवा
कुनुकश
परवूर
केरल
एरणाकुलम 2 दि.24.12.99 का 3673
केरल
तृक्काक्करा (उ) (ब्लॉक नं .6)
कणयन्नूर एरणाकुलम
काक्कनाड ( ब्लॉक नं.9)
केरल
कणयन्नूर एरणाकुलम
आलुवा पश्चिम ( ब्लॉक नं.37)
केरल
आलुवा
एरणाकुलम
केरल
आलुवा पश्चिम (ब्लॉक नं.34)
एरणाकुलम
आलुवा
पारक्कड़वु (ब्लॉक नं.5)
एरणाकुलम करल
आलुवा
पारक्कडवु ( ब्लॉक नं.6)
एरणाकुलम केरल
आलुवा
केरल
परदूर
एरणाकुलम
करुमल्लूर
केरल
परखुर
प्ररणाकुलम 3 दि.30.3.2000 का 791
केरल
तृक्काक्करा (उ) (ब्लॉक नं.6)
एरणाकुलम
कणयन्नूर
आलुवा पश्चिम (ब्लॉक नं.37)
आलुवा
केरल
एरणाकुलम
आलुया पश्चिम ( ब्लॉक नं.34)
केरल
आलुवा एरणाकुलम
पारक्कडवु (ब्लॉक नं.5)
आलुया
केरल
एरणाकुलम
प्रारक्कङवु ( ब्लॉक नं.6)
आलुया एरणाकुलम केरल
कुन्नुकरा
परयूर
केरल
एरणाकुलम
करुमल्लूर
परयूर
केरल
एरणाकुलम
केरल
परयूर
९रणाकुलम 4 दि.10.7.2001 का 1624 तिरुवान्कुलम (ब्लॉक नं .10)
केरल
कणयन्नूर एरणाकुलम
कडुडल्लूर
केरल
एरणाकुलम
परवूर
[पर , सं, आर-31015/27/2008-ओ, आर- ॥ ]
ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th September, 2008
S. O. 2708. Whereas by the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number 3280 dated 9.11.99 . 3673 dated 24.12.99.791 dated 30.3.2000 and 1624 dated 10,7.2001 in the following schedule , the Central Government directed that Right Of User in said land vest in the Petronet CCK Limited free from all encumbrances for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of motor spirit, superior kerosene and high speed diesel from the Irimpanam installation of Bharai Petroleum Corporation Limited, Irimpanam , Kachi in the State of Kerala to Karur in the State of Tamil Nadu and pipelines should be laid Dy M/ s.Petronet CCK Limited;
And whereas , by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. 1427 dated 11.06.2004 . as required under explanation - 1 of the rule of the Petroleum Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules 1963, the central government declared the date 15.12.2002 as date of termination of operation in the State of Kerala after the pipeline has been laid:
Now . M / s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited intends to lay Aif pipeline for the purpose of transportation of ATF product from BPCL's Kochi Refinery to Cochin International Airport at Nedumbassery through the ROU in the said land:
And whereas Petronet CCK Limited has no objection in permitting Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited for laying ATF pipeline in the same ROU used for laying Cochin -Coimbatore- Karur pipeline:
[ भाग 11- खष्ठ 3 (ii) ]
5411
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
Andwhereas Central Government after considering the request , satisfied that the said land are required for laying of ATF pipeline for transportation of ATF product from Kochi Refinery to Cochin International Airport:
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by section ( 4) of section 6 of the said act, the Central Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land shall be used by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited for laying ATF pipeline from Kochi Refinery to Cochin International Airport and pipelines should be laid by M/ s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited:
Name of Village SI . No.
S.O.No. andDate
3
2
1
SCHEDULE
State
District
Taluk
6
5
Kerala
Ernakulam
Parakkadavu (Block No.5)
3280 dated 9.11.99
Kerala
Ernakulam
Aluva
Parakkadavu ( Block No.6)
Kunnukara 2
3673 dated 24.12.99
Kerala
Emakulam
Paravur
Kerala
Emakulam
Kanayannur
Thrikkakara( N ) (Block No.6)
Kakkanad (Block No.9)
Aluva West (Block No.37)
Aluva West (Block No.34)
Kerala
Emakulam
Kanayannur
Kerala
Ernakulam
Aluva
Kerala
Emakulam
Aluva
Kerala
Emakulam
Aluva
Parakkadavu (Block No.5 )
Kerala
Emakulam
Aluva
Parakkadavu (Block No.6)
Kadungallur
Karumallur
Kerala
Ernakulam
Paravur
Kerala
Ernakulam
Paravur
Kerala
Emakulam
Thrikkakara North ( Block No.6jKanayannur
3
791 dated30.3.2000
Aluva West (Block No.37)
Aluva West (Block No.34]
Kerala
Ernakulam
Aluva
Kerala Aluva
Ernakulam
Kerala
Ernakulam
Aluva
Parakkadavu ( Block No.5)
Kerala
Emakulam
Aluva
Parakkadavu (Block No.6)
Kunnukara
Karumallur
Kadungallur
Emakulam Kerala Paravur
Kerala
Emakulam
Paravur
Kerala
Ernakularn
Paravur
Keraka
Emakulam
Kanayannur
Thiruvamkulam ( Black No.10)
1624 dated 10.7.2001
4
Kadungallur
Kerala
Ernakulam
Paravur
No.R-31015/27/2008-0.R. -II )
A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2709.- केंद्रीय सरकार , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना , दिनांक 1 जून , 2005 का एस.ओ. 1996 के आशोधन में और पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसार , केंद्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्री पी एन मोहनचंद्रन , प्रबंधक ( विधि प्रशासन) , पेट्रोनेट सीसीके लिमिटेड को कोचिन- कोयम्बत्तूर- करूर पाइपलाइन के लिए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में उनके कार्य के अतिरिक्त , उपर्युक्त अधिनियम के अधीन केरल राज्य के अंतर्गत , कोच्चि रिफ़ाइनरी से लेकर कोचिन अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विमानपत्तन तक कोचिन- कोयम्बत्तूर- करूर पाइपलाइन के लिए पेट्रोनेट सीसीके लिमिटेड द्वारा अर्जित आरओयू में भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एटीएफ पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्य करने को प्राधिकृत करता है ।
346761/08-5
[फ३. सं. आर-31015/27/2008- ओ. आर ॥ ]
ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव 5412
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ASVINA 5, 1930
[ PAR 11- SEC.3 ( it ) ] New Delhi , the 24th September, 2008
S. O. 2709 in modification of notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O.1996 dated 15 June, 2005 and in pursuance of clause ( a ) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisitions of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 , the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri.P.N.Mohanachandran , Manager ( Legal Administration) , Petronet CCK Limited , to perform the functions of the competent authority for laying an ATF pipeline by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited from Kochi Refinery to Cochin International Airport. in the ROU acquiredby Petranet CCK Limited for Cochin - Coimbatore - Karur pipeline, in addition to his function of the competent authority for Cochin - Coimbatore- Karur pipeline , under the said Act within temitory of Kerala.
[No. R-31015/27/2008-0.R. -II] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
नईदिल्ली, 26 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ. 2710.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित मे यह आवश्यक है कि कर्नाटक राज्य में देवनगोंदी से नया बेंगलोर अन्तर्राष्ट्रीय एअरपोर्ट, देवनहल्ली, तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वार। पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।
और ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है ।
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
उक्त अनुसूची में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस तारीख से. जिसको राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित्त इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिनों के भीतर, भूमि के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में लिखित रुप मे आक्षेप श्री आर. आर. जन्नू, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ( कर्नाटक), इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , एटीएफ पाइपलाइन परियोजना, नं 719, 4 ब्राास , 7 मैन कल्याण नगर, 1 ब्लाक बेंगलोर-560043 , कनाटक को भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
राज्य : कनर्नाटक
जिला : बेंगलोर अर्बन
तालूका : यलहंका
क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम
सर्वे नंबर हिस्सा नंबर
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टर
आर
6 1
3
5
4
2
होब्ली: जाला
31
0
41
36
दुम्मनहल्ली
[फा . सं, आर-25011 /3 / 2007-ओ.आर. [ 5413 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
[भाग - खण्ड (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 26th September , 2008
S. O. 2710.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government , that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Devanagondhi to New Bangalore International Airport Devanahalli in the State of Karnataka, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And, whereas , it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land , to Shri.R.R.Jannu , Competent Authority ( Karnataka ) , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , ATF Pipeline Project , No.719 , Ground Floor. 4th Cross , 7th Main , Kalyna Nagar , Ist Block Bangalore - 560043 ( Karnataka) .
SCHEDULE
State: Karnataka Taluk : Yalahanka
District : Bangalore Urban
Area
Survey no.
Name of the Village
Are
Sub -Division no.
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
6
5
4
3
2
1
Hobli : Jala
31
36
0
41
DHUMMANAHALLI
[F. No. R -25011 /3/2007- O.R. -1 S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
[PART 11 --SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 5414
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ASVINA 5, 1930
APPEARANCES
Advocte, Ms. S. N. Bhavsar for the first party.
श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त , 2008
Advocate, Shri Hitesh D. Katharotiya for the Second party.
AWARD
1. The Under Secretary , Ministry of Labour , Government of India, New Delhi has referred to this Tribunal , the dispute between above partics , for adjudication, vide its letter dated 27-06-2004. The dispute is shown in the Schedule as under :-
का.आ. 2711.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इलाहाबाद बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1221/08 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-8-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
SCHEDULE
[सं. एल-2012/41 /2004- आई. आर. ( वी. 1 ) ]
राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 29th August , 2008
"Whether the action of the management of Allahabad Bank through the Assistant General Manager in terminating the services of Shri Sunil K. Patel by way of 'dismissal without notice we .1. 3-3-2003 is legal , proper and justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workman , Shri Sunil K. Patel is entitled to and from which date and what other directions are necessary in thematter?"
2 Both the parties are served with notice and parmes appeared before the fribunal through their Advocates .
S.O. 2711.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 1221-08 ) of the Industrial Tribunal , Alunedabad (Gujarat ) as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the managemen: of Allahabad Barik and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-08-2008.
[No. L -1201241-2004 - IR (B - 11 ) ]
RAJJNDER KUMAR. Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
3. In the course of hearing the matter , the second party has filed withdrawal purshis Ex . Il and submitted before this Tribunal that as the second party and the first partyBank has settled the matter , the second party wanted to withdraw this maner and sought for permission to withdraw the Reference
BEFORESTURIER DAVE, PRESIDINGOFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD
Reference ( ITC) No. 1221/08
( d) Reference ( C.GJ.T.A) No. 1456:04
4. In view of these submissions , this fribunal recorded the withdrawal pushis granting the perintssion towithdraw the Reference as prayed for . Therefore , I pass the following order in this Reference.
ADJUDICATION
ORDER
BETWEEN
The Arsistant General Manag 다.
Allahabad it .
The withdrawal purshis Ex . 11 is allowed and permission is gramed to withdraw this Reference as prayed for. No order as to the co
RegionalOffice.
Date : 31-7-2008
P. R DAVE . Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली : सितम्बर 2008
2nd Floor , Navmlinuse , Opp Serdar Fatel Sewa Samaj Bhavan . C.G. Road . Navrangpura,
..First Party
Ahinedabad-380006 ( Gujarat)
AND
Shri Sunil Patel .
Flat No. A 208
का.आ. 2712.- आद्यागिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 1947 का ।4 ) की धारा 17 के अनु में कंन्द्रीय सरकार सो. पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के नीच. अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विद में आद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2008 को प्रकाशित करती है . जो कंम्द्रीय सरकार को ।की प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Shrinath complex, SwastikPark Society, Near Shacom Morale
Althan Road, Bhotar ,
[सं. एल 42012 181-2005 आई. आर ( सी.एप-11 ) | SecondParty
Sural - 39501 ( jarat )
अन्य कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi . the 1st September , 2008
S.O. 2712.-1a pursumice of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Dispute pertamin 10 rermination eithe services of the worierean , Sri Sulk. Patei [भाग []- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
Government herebypublishes the award (Ref No. 1534/2008) ofthe Industrial Tribunal , Ahmedabad (Gujarat ) as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management ofGandhinagar Electrical Division, Central Public Works Department, 2/44-A/ 14, Kalu Sarai , and their workmen, whichwas received by the Central Goveminent on 1-9-2008.
[No. L-42012/181 /2005 -IR (CM-II ) ]
AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (CENTRAL ) AT AHMEDABAD
BEFORE SHRIY. P. BHATT
Reference ( ITC) 1534/08/ OldNo. Reference (C.G.L.T.A. ) No. 175/60 ADJUDICATION
BETWEEN
1. The Executive Engineer (Electrical ) , Gandhinagar Electrical Division, CPWD, Second Floor, Nirman Sadan , Sector- 10 /A, CHH-3 , Gandhinagar .
2.The Assistant Engineer (Electrical) , Central Public Works Department, Baroda Central Electrical Sub Station , DakBunglow, Fatehgunj Circle, Vadodara (Gujarat) -390002,
3.The Superintending Engineer (Electrical) , Central Public Works Department , Mumbai Central Electrical Circle, Second Floor .New C.G.O. Building New Marine Lines . Mumbai -400020,
...FirstParty 4.M/ s . Swastik Enterprises, 2/44-A/ 14 , Kalu Sarai , Behind Hauz Khaz Terminal , Hauz Khas, New Delhi - 1 10016.
AND
...Second party Shri Vijay Haribhai Parmar & 5 Others, 10/1701 , Sanskar Nagar Apartment, Near Gayatri Nagar, Gotri , Vadodara (Gujarat) -390021 .
APPEARANCES
Shri R. S. Munshi for the first party. No one appeared for the second party.
AWARD
This Industrial Dispute between the above said parties was referred by the Desk Officer . Government of India. Ministry of Labour, New Delhi vide order No. -L-42012/181 /2005 - IR (CM -II) dated 14-09-2006 to the Contral Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad for adjudication under Section 10 ( 1 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The said dispute was
5415
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5, 1930
subsequently transferred to this Tribunal by order of the competent authority. The dispute between the parties relates to the following demands ofthe workmen concerned.
"Whether the action of the management ofCentral Public Works Department, Gandhinagar in terminating the services of Sh. Vijay Haribhai Parmar and 5 others from the date of their respective termination as per list, enclosed, is legal and justified If not, to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled ?"
After the case was transferred to this Tribunal , the notices were sent to the parties, It appears that there are in all sixworkmen concerned in this case . The main workman is Vijay Haribhai Parmar ofwhose address is given in the order ofReference . Said Vijay Haribhai Parmar was served as per Ex, 5, however , neither he nor his fellow workmen are attending this Tribunal. It therefore appears that none of the workmen have any interest in this case . This Reference case is, therefore, dismissed for want ofprosecution . Order accordingly with no order as to costs.
Ahmedabad Dated: 8-8-2008
Y. P. BHATT, mdustrial Tribunal ( Central) नई दिल्ली , 1 सितम्बर, 2008
का.आ. 2713 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 1-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल -40011/26/95- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 1st September , 2008 S.O. 2713. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. --- ) of the Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Posts and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 1-9-2008 .
[No. L40011 /26/95 - IR (DU ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI YP., BILATT, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD , GUJARAT
Vadodara No. Ref. ( ITC) No. 4 of 1996 CGIT, A'bad No. Ref. CGITA No. 34 of 2007 (Slate Ind. Tribunal , A'badNo. Reference ( IT -C) No. 1585 of 2008 5416
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 / ASVINA 5 , 1930
[PART LI SEC. 3 (ii) ] ADJUDICATION BETWEEN
Management of Post: Through
1. The Chief Post Master General , Ahmedabad.
2. The Sr. Post Master , Raopura , Vadodara .
3. The SSP Vadodara.
First party
AND
retained; that during the conciliation proceeding the management had stated that it is because of the desire of the authorities that the workman is not being reinstated. The authorities remained present during the conciliation butdid not concede to his claim and hence the conciliation officer had to make a failure report . The workman also stated that he is out ofjob since his termination and accordingly it is prayed that he may be reinstated with full back wages and continuity of service etc.
Theworkmen
...Second party, In the matter oftermination of service ofShri G.S. Dudhwala .
APPEARANCE
Shri PM Rami , the Icarned Assistant Govt . Pleader for the first party.
Shri Bharat T. Majmudar , the learned Advocate for the second party.
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour in Government of India referred this industrial dispute between the aforesaid parties vide its arderNo. L -40011/ 26/95 - IR(DU) dated 27-06-1996 firstly to the Industrial Tribunal , Vadodara. Subsequently on establishment of CGIT- cum- Labour Court here at Ahmedabad. this dispute was transferred to the said CGIT videorders of the competent authoritics Thereafter, by an order of Hon. High Court of Gujarat, this dispute along with the other disputes pending with the CGFT were transferred to the State Industrial Tribunal at Ahmedabad . The registration number of this dispute is , therefore , recorded for all the three Fribunals . The dispute relates to the following demand of the workmen as stated in the schedule to the order of Reference:
"Whether the action of management of Chief Post Master General . Vadodara Region Ahmedabad Post Master, Raopura Branch , Vadodara and SSP Vadodara. East Division , Vadodara in terminating the services of Shri G.S. Dudhwała is justitied? If not LO what relict the workthan is entitled to ? "
3.The employer filed defence statement at lix . 13 and denied various contentions raised by the workman in the statement of claim . It is submitted by the einployer that the workman was engaged in leave period of various permanent Group -Dofficials by the Sr. Post Master , Vadodara Head Office. It is denied that the workman was appointed on clear vacant post . It is again stated that he was engaged on short term períods of leave of permanent Group - D officials and when their leave was over , such smalljoined their duties and hence the workman cannot be continued against the same post; that it was a contract of specific short teren leave period of permanent staff. It is also submined by the employer that the workman was not recruited through the departmental due procedure and he was not regularly appointed and therefore, there is no provision to issue chargesheets etc.; that in fact when the permanent group . ▷ staff joins his dury , the workman has to go home: that the behaviour , attitude of the workinan etc. has no relevance, that the workman cannot in any circumstances can possess the status of the regular employce of the department and therefore , there is no question of his reinstatement; that no juniors were retained or absorbed as alleged by the workman 11 is submitted by the employer that lastly the workman was engaged for two days Le . For 01-09-88 and02-09-88 and the conciliation proceedings were held; on 25-12-1994 . Thus , there was abnormal delay on the part of the workman; that since the workman had not fulfilled the conditions for recruitment i e nomination through the Employment Fachange , examination , selection etc. he had no locus srandi for being absorbed in the department of the employer . It is also contended by the employer that the department is not an industry when the Industrial Disputes Act . After certain repetition , the employer requested to dismiss this Reference case.
2 Shra G.S. Dudhwala, bereinafter referred to as"The workman " filed statement 01 claim at Ex . 7 and stated therein that he was working under the first party , hereinafter referred to as " Ihe employer " on the vacant post of packer from 13-08-1986 and his services were termmated by an oral order dated 31-08-1988 . It is stated by the workman that he was not issued any charge sheet , memo etc. and that his services were satisfactory; that hefore terminaວ ເing his services , no due procedure was followed nor arty opportunity of hearing was given and therefore , his termination amounts to illegal retrenchment. The workman has also stated the numbers of days he worked in a tabular forin and submitted that he had completed 2:40 days services continuchusly and the termination of his serviceby an oral order being illegal . he is entitled to be remstated in service with full wages. It is alleged that the employer has adopted tacties of perpetual ad - hocism : that junior persons are
4 The workman deposed at 1 : 8 19 wherein he stated that he was appointed by Senior Post Master and was working in Kaopora Post Office, that he was appointed in clear vacancy of Group 10 stall and worked as such from 13-08-86 10 31-08-88 , He was orally discharged ; no compensation was paid that he filled up hond of Rs . 1000 that he had worked for 582 days; that KM Saiyad and Kli Adhyaru have been appointed after him and are still working. In the cross examination, the workman stated that he was failed in SSC and that hy intervige was not held and was directly taken , i le denied that he was taken ven work in place of permanent employee when they proceeded [ भाग 1]- खण्ड (ii) ]
on leave. He was not given identity card nor he was given other facility; that he was given salary after obtaining signature in the pay roll. He denied that he cannot read and write in English. He admits that he was not given order in writing by the employer. He finally admits that he was given work when the permanent employee of the department proceeds on leave.
5. Considering the deposition of the workman , the days ofhis service does not seem to be challenged by the employer in the cross examination . Similarly, his allegation that KM Saiyad and KG Adhyaru who were taken after him were continued in the service is also not challenged in the cross examination . The only material admission that was obtained in the cross examination was that he was given work when the permanent ' D ' staff proceeds on leave. He has denied thathe had not worked continuously.
6. The employer examined Shri Panabhai Chhaganbhai Garnit as its witness at Ex . 37 who is Deputy PostMaster at Vadodara . He admits that the workman was working on daily wages basis and was given work when permanent employee proceeds on leave; that he was paid wages for the days he had worked; that he was given work with a view that the work of postal department may not be stopped in the absence of the permanent employee . It is stated by the witness that he was not appointed as per rules of the Government. In the cross examination , the witness was shown Ex. 20 which is the details of presence ofthe workman produced by the employer vide list Ex . 14. The witness states that the muster roll and pay roll of the workman are in the custody of the accounts office. He states that the Post Master can retain outsider on work; that in 1986 the qualification for Group ' D ' was seventh standard pass . The witness admits that the work which was taken from the workman was that of a permanent employee in the later's absence . Rest of the cross examination does not seem to be material for the purpose ofthis case .
7. Ifwe consider the deposition ofthe witness ofthe employer , only one fact is coming out and that is the workman was given work when the permanent employee proceeds on leave . It appears that at the relevant time the workman being SSC failed, was having qualification for being appointed as Group ' D ' staff.
8. The first closing pursish of workman is at Ex . 28 and second is at Ex. 60. Similarly, the employer has also given two closing pursish vide Ex . 38 and 65. The written arguments of the workman is at Ex . 66 and that of the employer is at Ex. 76. I have considered the rival contentions of the parties in the written arguments together with the evidence on record.
9. The undisputed fact is that the workman had entered the service ofthe employer on 13-08-1986 and had worked up to 02-09-1988. Barring August and September , 1986, and the last month September , 1988, the workman
5417
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
had put in 23 to 30 days work in each month . Indisputably, the workman had put in more than 294 days of service within twelve months prior to his termination . Admittedly, hewas not given notice of retrenchment, nor retrenchment compensation was offered or given to him . The only defence of the employer as is appear from the record is that the workman was given work because the permanentGroup 'D' employee had proceeded on leave and also with a view to see that the work of the post office should not be stopped. Ifwe go through Sec. 25f ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, wherein conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen is stated, we do not find a provision that if a workman is retained to do work of a permanent employce continuously for more than two years, he can be discharged without payment of retrenchment of compensation etc. Therefore, in the humble opinion of this Tribunal , the so called termination of the workman on 02-09-1988 was retrenchment of the workman and since the conditions precedent were not followed by the employer, the said retrenchment was in violation of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . In the written arguments of the employer it is contended that the workman cannot be considered to be permanent because his appointment was notdone after written test, oral interview etc. Sec. 251 of the Industrial Disputes Act also does put a condition that the workman concerned should be a permanent workman and should have been appointed after written test, oral interview etc. The contention in the written arguments of the employer that the workman had not completed 240days in any of the year is devoid of any merits because it is against the record produced in this case.
10. From Ex. 20 it also does not appear that the workman was given work only when the permanent employee proceeds on leave . On several occasions the workman was given work on vacant post which fell vacant on account ofretirement of concerned employee .On several occasion the workman was given work because the holder of the said post was sent on deputation to somewhere else. Thus , the workman had rightly contended in the statement of claim as also in his deposition that he was given work on vacant post .
11. The learned Assistant Government Pleader drew my attention to the written arguments of the employer and submitted that postal department is not an industry within the definition of the " industry " given in the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. He also cited decision ofHon . Supreme Court in Sub-Divisional Inspector of Post , Vaikam and Others Versus Theyyam Joseph etc. which was published in 1996 II LLJ 230 , I have gone through the said decision. It was heldby Hon . Supreme Court that to provide telecommunication service to the general public and amenity, was essential part of the sovereign function of the welfare state and hence the postal department was not an industry as defined in the Industrial Disputes Act . The learned AGP has also produced Swamy's Service Rules for 5418
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 /ASVINA 5 , 1930
the ED Staffwhich were discussed in the said decision of Hon. Supreme Court . The present workman was not from ED staff. It was not the case of any of the parties that the workman was covered by the ED staff. If that be so . he ought to have been selected by a due process governed bysaid Swamy's service rules for ED staff. If that be so. he could not have been discharged without following those rules. The fact is , the present workman was not covered by those rules and hence those rules have no application to present case.
12. The decision of Hon . Apex Court in Sute- Divisional Inspector ofPost , Vaikam Vis. Theyyam Joseph etc. 1996 II 1.1.J 230 was renderred by a Two Judge Bench and the same was subsequently held by a Three Judge Bench of Hon . Apex Court as not laying down the correct law. The later decision came to be published in 1998 [ LLJ 255 in General Manager , TELECOM and Srinivasa Rao S. andOthers . At para 5 of the decision the Hon . Supreme Court stated:
5. A two judge Bench of this Court in Theyyam Joseph's case ( supra ) held that the function of the Postal Department are part of the sovereign functions of the State and it is . therefore, not an industry' within the definition of Section 2 (j ) of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947. Incidentally, this decision was rendered without any reference to the seven Judge Bench decision in Bangalore Water Supply ( supra ) . In a later two Judge Bench decision in Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees ' Association case ( supra) . this decision was followed for taking the view that the Telephone Nigam is not an " industry' . Reliance was placed inTheyyam Joseph's case ( supra) for that view. However , in Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees' Association case ( i.e. The later decision ) , we find a reference to the Bangalore Water Supply case . After referring to the decision in Bangalore Water Supply case (supra) it was observed that if the doctrine enunciated in Bangalore Water Supply case is strictly applied, the consequence is 'catastrophic' . With respect , we are unable to subscribe to this view for the obvious reason that it is in direct conflict with the seven Judge Bench decision in Bangalore Water Supply case ( supra) by which we are bound. It is needless to add that it is not permissible for us, or for that matter any Bench of lesser strength , to take a view contrary to that in Bangalore Water Supply case (supra ) or to bypass that decision so long as it holds the field. Moreover , that decision was renderred long back nearly two decades earlier and we find no reason to think otherwise . Judicial discipline requires us to follow the decision in Bangalore Water Supply case ( supra ) . We
[PART II Seiilj must. theretore add that the decision in Theyyam Joseph cbe supray and Bomicas Telephone Canteen Ermolosees Association case ( supra ) caminot be treated as laying down the correctlaw This being the onis point fur decision in this appeal , it must l'ail
I am ofthe view that in view arthenonesakt later deciski . thedecision cited by leamed AGP in Theyyam Jusepli's case will not be applicaible to present case . The postal departinent is an industry and the present workinan was 'workman' within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act.
13. Even otherwise also , in Sec. 2 which detines various clauses of the Industriai Disputes Act . there is lefinition of public utilny service under See 2 anni) postal , telegraph or telephone sers ices are hell to be public utility service . The first Schedule to the said Act enumerates various industries which may be declared as publie uriling services by the appropriate Liovernment . Sec. 22 imposes t ban on STRIKE in the public utility scruce without certain Formalities otherwise srike could be held to be illegal . Presently, even the telephone services , cellular phone services and courier services are being entrusted to the private parties with cerizin regulatory restrictions and therefore , perhaps such industry may not be called part of sovereign function of the State .
14. The retrenchment of the wokeman was . therefore . illegal . The question is, sliocid he be reinstated? Ordinarily, when retrenchiment is held to be illegal , the workman concerned has to be rettsted listene decisions tisat 11 is not necessary to award remstatement in every case where the retrenchment is held tu ne illegal to the new of Dis Tribunal , each case must be examined on its own merits There is no dispute that the workman had continuousiy worked for more than two years. The employer has also not refuted the contention of the threat that his harniers have been continued . The workman had also given names ofhisjunior workers . The wimess of the employer as also admitted that presently there are 37 posts of Group D. The circumstances that the sorkutan had even worked on vacant post when the regtar employees were sent on deputation . All these facts snows that workman shouldhe ordered to be reinstated with continuity of service .
15. So far as the back wages are concerned , the same cannot be awarded to the workman . The reason being that the workman was retrenched on 02-09-1988 . We do not know when he started the proceeding before conciliation officer but there is one contention of the workthan in ste statement of claim at paragraph 8 and that is admitted by the employer in the defence statement at paragraph 11 bal the conciliation proceedings were held on 25-12-1994 We do not know that it was the only date and on m י adier dates the conciliation proceedings were held It may be presumedfrom the atores.ud facts that there was sonte delay on the part of the workman , but in the absence of the statutory limitation such delay may not diseminle the 5419 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) )
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5, 1930
Versus
(1 ) The Asstt . Manager (D) , Food Corporation of India, Dharamkot
(2) Sr. Regional Manager , FCI , Punjab Region , Sec . 34-A, Chandigarh Respondem
APPEARANCES
For theWorkman
: None Sh . N. K. Zakhmi FortheManagement AWARD
workman from claiming the relief ofreinstatement so far as present case is concerned, but he can certainly be denied the monetary benefit in the nature of back wages. Another aspect of the maner is that though the oral evidence of the employerwas over on 07-01-2003 , neither the workman nor his representative argued their case before the Industrial Tribunal, Vadodara where the case was being conducted initially. The workman must also have earned some thing during the period of his unemployment. This Tribunal, therefore, is not inclined to grant any back wages to the workmart. In the result, I pass the following order:--
Passed on-13-8-2008
ORDER
Central Govt. vide notification No. L- 22012/54/2001- IR ( CM - II) , dated 29-8-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of Sh. DarshanDyal Sto Sh Ral Lal is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date? "
This Reference case is allowed. The action of the concerned Postal Authorities as stated in the schedule to the order ofReference in terminating the services of Shri G.S. Dudhwala is held to be unjustified. The workman is held entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages . The said Postal Authorities shall reinstate the said workman within one month from the date of publication ofthis award.
There is no order as to costs .
Date: 13th August, 2008
Y. P. BHATT, Industrial Tribunal नई दिल्ली, 2 सितम्बर , 2008
2.No one is present on behalf of workman . Learned representative of the management Shri N. K. Zakhmi is present. Since morning this reference has been called number oftimes . At 10.45 a, m. it was ordered to be placed before this Tribunal once again at 2 p.m. It is 2.30 now and on repeated calls no one is present, in spite of having of full knowledge of the proceedings of this reference. The reference is as old as referred to this Tribunal in the year 2002. On repeated calls since morning no one is present. Accordingly, the reference is dismissed in default for non- prosecution. Central Government be informed accordingly. File to be consigned.
का.आ. 2714. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विषाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 179/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
Chandigarh Dated: 13-8-2008
GK, SHARMA, PresidingOfficer [सं. एल-22012/54/2001-आई. आर. ( सी.एम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी
नई दिल्ली, 2 सितम्बर , 2008 New Delhi, the 2nd September, 2008
का.आ. 2715. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत्तीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच. अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1. चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 141/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/80/2001- आई. आर. ( सी.एम -11 ) ] S.O. 2714. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No.179/ 2002) of the Central Govt . Industrial - Tribunal-cum - Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen, which was received bythe Central Government on 2-9-2008.
अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी [No. L-22012/54/2001 - IR ( CM- II )]
NewDelhi , the 2nd September , 2008 AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMARSHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH
Case No. I.D 179/2002
Sh Darshan Dyal ,
S.O. 2715. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 141 / 2002) of the Central Govt: Industrial - Tribunal - cum-Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen . which was received by the Central Govertument on 2-9-2008.
[No. L-22012/80/ 2001 - IR ( CM - 11 ) AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Ollicer C/o General Secretary , Trade Union Council, Patiala.
......Applicant
3467G1/08-6 5420
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ASVINA 5 , 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH
Case No. I.D 141/2002
Sh . Jarnail Sing , C/ o General Secretary , Trade Union Council, Patiala.
[PART 11-Stc . 3 (ii ) ] New Delhi , the 3rd September , 2008 S.O. 2716.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 87/2001 ) of the Central Govt . Industrial - Tribunal - cum - Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom , and their workınan , which was received by the Central Government on 3-9-2008.
Applicant
Versus
( 1 ) The Asstt. Manager ( D), Food Corporalion of India, Dharamkot.
(2) Sr. Regional Manager. FCI , Punjab Region , Sec . 34-А , Chandigarh
[No. L-40012/524/2000 - IR (DU ) ]
AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
.Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the Workman
: None
: Sh . N. K. Zakhmi For the Management
AWARD
Passed on-13-8-2008
Central Govt , vide Notification No. L -22012 / 80 /2001- IR ( CM - 111 , dated 24-7-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of indie in terminating the services of Sh. Juracil Singh So Sh Bachan Singh is legal and justified if not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to ?
2. No one is present on behalf ofworkman . Learned representative the management Shri N. K. Zakhmi is present . Since worming this reference has been called number of times . A1 10 :45cm 11 was ordered to be placed before this Tribunal unce again at 2 p.m It is 2.30 now and on repeated calls no oss is present , in spite of having of full knowledge of the proceedings of this reference. The reference is as old as referred to this Tribunal in the year 2002.On repeated calls since morning no one is present. Accordingly, the reference is dismissed in default for non- prosecution. Central Government be informed accordingly . File to be consigned .
Chandigarh Dated: 13-8-2008
GK. SHARMA. Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 3 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ. 2716. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , कंन्द्रीय सरकार दूर मंचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संचद्ध, नियंत्रिकों और उनके कर्मकारों वा बीच . अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरणःश्रम ययालय नं । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ मंग 87:2001 ( को अकरित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-9 - אחז0ב कां प्राप्त हुआ था ।
| अं. फूल -4000 2.521/ 2000 आई आर ( हु । अजय कुमार पाँड, डस्क अधिकारी BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDINGOFFICER CENTRALGOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH
Case No. 1.10 87/2001
Sh. Jaswant Singh. Sto Sh. Nathu Singh ,
C/ o N. K. Jeet , 27349, Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda
(Punjab) 151001
Applicant
Ferstas
( 1 ) The Divisional Engineer , Telegraph , Microwave Maintenance, Bhatinda ( Punjab ) 151001
Respondent
APPEARANCES
None
For the Workman
: Sh . Anish Babbar For the Management
AWARD
Passed on - 12-8-2008
Central Govt. vide Notification No. 1-40012/524/2000- IR ( DU ), dated 31-1-2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of Sh. Jaswant Singh So Sh Nathu Singh is just and legal ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date?"
2. No one is present on behalf of workman . Learned representative of the management Shri Anish Babbar is present. Since morning this reference has been called number of times. At 10.45 am , it was ordered to be placed before this Tribunal once again at 2 pm . It is 2.30 now and on repeated calls no one is presetit, in spite of having of full knowledge of the proceedings of this reference. The reference is as old as referred to this Iribunal in the year 2001. On repeated calls since morning no one is present. Accordingly, the reference is dismissed in default for non- prosecution . Central Government be informed accordingly . File to be consigned.
Chandigarh Dated: 12-8-2008
G.K. SHARMA . Presiding Officer [भाग ॥- खण्ड (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 3 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2717.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.बी.एम. बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायलय नं. । , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 117/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -42012/80/92-आई आर( डीयू) ]
अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 3rd September, 2008 S.O. 2717 .--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 117/ 93) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. I , Chandigarh , now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BBMB, and their workman, which was received by the Central Goverrunent on 3-9-2008.
[No. L-42012/80/92- IR(DU) AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH.
Case No. ID 117/1993
5421
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27, 2008/आश्विन 5, 1930
"Whether the decision of the management of B.B.M.B. communicated to Shri Sardari Lal in compliancewith the directions of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 6-11-90 in Civil Writ Petition No. 14026/90 is legally justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled
As per the statement of claim, the workman , an ex- serviceman of the Indian Army and had served the same for about 15years as Wireless Operator, was employedby the management of respondent as Wireless Operator in the year 1982 in the Hydrology Division and was depud towork on specified period in every rainy season Liil 1989.
As per the policy decision ofthe management , the management had taken some persons on daily- wages as Wireless Operators . The persons who were taken as Wireless Operators , on daily- wages are Shri Vidya Dass , Shri Sanıp Chand and Shri Arjun Sin ga posted at Sunni . Sunder Nagar and Dallid respectively , since July , 1989 on regular basis , irrespective ofthe fact , that all these persons named above were junior to him. Noretainership allowance was given for the period in which petitioner was put in idolness after the expiry of every rainy season . Shri Sarep Chand was appointed even though he was not having the required qualification and was over - aged and the nante ef the workman was not considered which is unfait labour practices. The workman had made number of representations to the management of respondent for regularization of his services and the last representation by Registered A.D. was sent to the management on4-1-90 . Therefore, regularization in service is prayed by the workman.
Applicant
Sh. Sardari Lal C/o President, Nangal BhakraMazdoor Sangh, Nangal Township, District Ropar,
Versus
Respondent
The Chief Engineer, BBMB, Nangal Township , District Ropar
APPEARANCES
For the Workman:
Shri R. K. Singh
For the Management ; Shri Bhagat Singh
AWARD
Passed on 13-8-08
Ministry of Labour , Government of India vide Notification No. L-420/ 12/80/92 IR-(DU) dated 29-9-93 referred the following industrial dispute for judicial adjudication:
Apart from the objections on merit few preliminary objections were, raised by the management . Considering the nature of the preliminary objections raised and on the basis ofthe fact that these preliminary objections were not pressed, thereafter, I am not mentioning the preliminary objections . It has been stated by the management of respondent in written Statement that except for the monsoon season of 1983 , as the workman did not appear for the interview, he was given a regular work in the year 1982, and from 1984 to 1990. The selection was based on the interview every year and the appointment was given for specified period during monsoon season in these ycars . Management denied that any person junior to him was appointed on the regular basis against the permanent vecancies. In the year 1988 , all the 4 persons namely Vidya Dass, Arjun Singh, Sarup Singh and Sardari Lal were selected for the monsoon season and all were informed co join on 9.7.98 telegraphically. Shri Vidya Das joined on 9-7-88, Shri Arjun Singh joined on 10-7-88, Shri Sarup Singh joined on 11-7-88 and the workman Shri Sardari Lal joined on 13-7-88 . Thus , on the basis ofthe date ofjoining Sardari Lal , the workman was junior to all the three persons named above. As per the policy letter No. 30315-450 -PD/468/87 -A 5422
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 /ASVINA 5, 1930
dated 8-3-54 iramed incompliance of directions ofHon'ble the Hignat given in Civil Writ Petition No. 27/88 , Snot . Ram Piarı and Others ts . B.R.M.B the workman is junior to all the three above named persons . Hor:' ble the Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 563.500 declined to intervene in the policy instructions made by the managemen B. M.P The workmen were appointed for the short period, therefore , there is no question in the payment of retainership allowance.
itemicadings of parties, it is also evident that betethis rence Shri Sardari Lal raised ademand notice and during the conciliation proceedings before ALC , Chandgad .. he withdrew the demand notice and filed a writ petilius titled as Writ Petition No. 14026/90 before Punjab and Haryana High Court. The Division Bench of Punja! and Haryana High Court on 5-11-90 passed the following order...
* ter hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner we representation made by the petitioner in the ... application dated 28-3-88 ( Annexure 1), Aresure P-1 and dated 14-1-90 ( Annexure P-5 ) have nos been considered by the respondents erder. The respondents are directed to examine the content ne made by the petitioner in the aforesaid representations and decided the same in accordance with law be passing & speaking order within 3 months. Petition stands disposed of."
On perusal of the materials on record , it is also evident that the representations of workman Shri Sardari Lal were considered and examined as per law , policy instructions of the management and a self contained speaking order was passed vide letter No. 118-2 . HYD dated 23-1-91 rejecting to the claims of the workman . The decision of Executive Engineer dated 23-1-91 was conveyed to the workman . Thereafter, the workman again raised the industrial dispute which was referred by Ministry of labour. Government of India to tas Tribunal for judicial adjudication on account ofthe faisure of the conciliation proceedings .
The main question for determination before this Tribunal is winesher the management of the respondent has righils rejected the contentions of workman made by him in two representations . The claim of the workman is that the services of 3 juniors were regularized and he was denied for the regularization The management had disputed this contention by saying that all the 3 persous named by the workman are senior to him as per the seniority list available on record , I have gone through the Semority List which was prepared by the management of respondent in compliance of the order ofthe Hon'ble High Courtof Punjab and Haryana given in Civil Writ Petition No. 27-88 . Smt . Ram Piari and Others vir . B.B.M.B. The seniority list prepared by the management under directions of Hon'ble the ligh Court of Punjab and Haryana was not interfered by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 593.590 and
[PART I-SEC. 3 (ii) ] accordingly the seniority list prepared as per the Board Policy No. 3031-450 / PD -168/ 87 - A dated 8-7-88 becomes final . As per the seniority list, the 3 persons named by the workman in his statement of clain namely Shri VidyaDass, Shri Arjun Singh and Shri Sarup Singh are senior to Sardari Lal , the workman in fpresent case . The management of respondent has also shown the cause of juniority of Shri Sardari Lal as he joined on 13-7-88 whereas , the above named persons have joined earlier to 13-7-88 . Thus , on the basis of the policy decision taken by the management of respondent which was in compliance of the direction of Hon'ble the High Court and was approved by the lол'выс Supreme Court of India, no discretion or regularization of the services is made by the management. Apart from this. the regularization of the workman on any other ground cannot be considered by this Tribunal because of the directions of Hon'ble Apex Court in Uma Devi's case (Secretary . State of Karnataka ux Ilma Devi 2006 5CT462).
Accordingly , the management of the respondent has rightly disposed of the representations of the workman with the right finding declining the prayer of the workman and the workman is not entitled to any relief. The reference is answered accordingly . let Central Government be informed. File he consigned
Chandigarh
G. K. SHARMA. Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 3 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2718. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा । ? के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्यागिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अप न्यायलय , नं.। , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 145: 91 को प्रकाशित करती हैं , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
एल -2016/91 - आई आर ( डी.यू. 门 अजय कुमार गीड़ , डेस्क अधिकारो New Delhi, the 3rd September . 2008 S.O. 2718. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947th of 1947 ) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No 145 91 ) of the Central Governmeni Industrial Tribunal - cuu- Labour Court , No. 1. Chandigarh, as shows in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the managinent of Mis . BBMB and their workman , which was received by the Central Government оп 3-9-2008 .
[No. 1.-42011-16-91 - IR( DU ALAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 5423
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRIGYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT-1 , CHANDIGARH
accepted that for the reappointment of the retrenches , there is a scheme for awarding the increments and their pay had been fixed in accordance with the , said policy . 'The main question for the determination of this Tribunal is whether the workman is entitled for their protection of pay on fresh appointment to the B.B.M.B. by the Chief- Engineer?
Case No. ID 145/1993
Sh. Satpal Shah, General Secretary, B.B.M.B. Karamchari Sangh, Nangal Township , Distt . Ropar (Punjab) -140124.
....Applicant
:
Versus
The Chief Engineer , Bhakra Dam , Bhakra Beas Management Board , Nangal Township , Distt . Ropar ( Pb.)- 140124.
....Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the workman :
Shri R. K. Singh
ShriBhagat Singh
For the management :
AWARD
Passed on 12-8-08
Central Government vide notification no . L-420 11 / 16/91 - IR ( D.U . ) dated 8-10-91 , referred the following industrial dispute for judicial adjudication to this Tribunal:-
"Weather the action of the Chief Engineer , Bhakra Dam , B.B.M.B. Nangal Township in declining to give pay protection to the workmen ( as per annexure) is justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled ?"
It is true that all the employees were fixed to the lesser basic pay as compared from the basic pay they were getting in their previous assignment at the time of their retrenchment. But as stated earlier that their appointment is fresh in the different capacity and as per the policy ofthe B.B.M.B. , which is accepted by all the workmen , they were given the benefit of the fixation of pay by giving some additional increments on the length of service . As per the letter dated 13-5-76, which is the also decision of the B.B.M.B. for every retrenches on his re - appointment one increment will be given for two years services in the department from which he was retrenched subject to the five maximum increments . As per this policy decision, the pay of all the workmen was fixed and accepted by the workmen . Now, it is not open to them to re - open the matter once again for fixation of the salary on the basis of the basic pay scale they were drawing in the previous department at the time of their retrenchiment . The appointment of all the workmen is fresh . They have been given the benefit of the increments as per the above policy of B.B.M.B. and all the workmen have received the retrenchment compensation from the department, they were retrenched. Accordingly, this reference is answered positively that the action of the Chief Engineer, 13hakra Dam , B.B.M.B. , Nangal Township " in declining to give pay protectionto the workmen ( as per annexure ) is justified and the workmen. are not entitled to any relief. Let the Central Government be informed. File is consigned.
G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 3 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2719, औद्योगिक विषाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 को 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जवाहर नवोदय विद्यालय के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायलय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ से 17/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं एल -42012/66/94- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]
अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी
NewDelhi , the 3rd September, 2008 Asper the pleadings ofthe parties, all ofthe workmen named in the annexure list to the reference, which are 18 in No. are retrenches of Beas Daml BSL project . Out of the above workmen, the workmen mentioned at serial No.1-11 were re-employed in B.R.S. division whereas , the workmen mentioned from serial No. 12-17 were re -employed in the Bhakra Mechanical Division and the last workmen mentioned at serial no. 18 was re- employed in the Bhakra Dam, Division Nangal by the Chief Engineer, Bhakra Dam. It was the fresh appointment of the workmen and the benefit vide letter No. 5259-61 /BMB/ 1713 /46/SUB , daied 13-5-76 regarding the increments to retrenched employees was given to all the workmen at the time of their fresh appointment . All the workmen accepted the benefit of increments and after their appointment raised the industrial dispute for the protection of the salary of basic pay which they were getting at the time of their retrenchment from previous assignment.
S.O. 2719.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 17/95) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour All the workmen filed the affidavits and they were cross - examined by the learned legal advisor of the management of B.B.M.B. Almost all the workmen have 5424
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27, 2008/ASVINA 5 , 1930
Court , No. 1 , Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure . in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalya and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 3-9-2008 .
[No. L -42012 /66/ 94-IR (DU) AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT-1, CHANDIGARH
Case No. ID 17/1995
Sh. Subey Singh S/ o Sh . Harinder Kumar, Advocate District Court , Bhiwani- 125036
[PART II- SFC . 3 ( ii) ] He raised certain preliminary objections which were not pressed thereafter . On merits , it has been stated by the Principal , Navodaya Vidyalaya , Devrala that the workman wasappointed on 12-4-91 against a temporary vacancy of daily wager for a limited period for casual work. The Government sanction two daily wager post for Kendriya Vidyalaya which were withdrawn and accordingly the workman was relieved. The workman has not work for 240 days continuously in the preceding year from the date of his termination and accordingly was not entitled to any relief in terms ofthe reference.
Opportunity for adducing evidence was given to both ofthe parties . The workman filed his affidavit and was cross- examinedby learned counsel for the Kendriya Vidyalaya and, accordingly, Principal Kedriya Vidyalaya filed his affidavil and was cross-examined in detail by learned counsel for the workman.
.....Applicant
Versus
The Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya , Devrala , District- Bhiwani
....Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the Workman :
Sri Sagır Ahmed
For the management : Sri Sandeep Bhardwaj
AWARD
Passed on 13-8-2008
Central Government vide notification No. L -42012/ 66.94-1R ( 1) 11. ) dated 22-2-95 , referred the following industrial dispute for judicial adjudication to this Tribunal:
Weather the action of the management of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya in terminating the service of Shri Subey Singh ex - group D daily paid employee w.e.l. 15-12-42 just , fair and legal ? Ifnot , what relief he is entitled to and from what date ?"
The contentuon of the workman is that he was appomed by the Principal , Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya , Devrala on the post of group D ' w.e.f. 12-1-91 and he was assigned the duties of Plumber. Mess -helper and Peon -can- Chowkickar.Hewas appointed through Employment Exchange. Haryana on daily wages and he continued to work up to 15-12-92 . and hos , he has complered more than 240 days service without any break The Principal . Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya terminated his services on 15-12-92 without notice or retrenchment compensation for which he raised an industrial dispute before R.L... and on failure of conciliation proceedings the above mentioned reference was referred to this tribunal by Central Governmem for judicial adjudicatum
Principal , Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya . Devrala . Bhiwani opposed the relerence by filing written statement Certain documents have been filed by the workıtian , Order dated 12-4-91 which is the appointment letter of Shri Subey Singh , workman is en record. Relieving order 15-12-92 is also on record These letters are Ex. W.2 and W.3 respectively. Ex . W.4 is the letter written by the Principal Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Devrala on 10-12-92 to the Deputy Director Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti . Regional Office Jaipur asking him to sanction one post of group " D " employee under General category to adjust the services of Shri Subey Singh. In his letter the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya has mentioned the dates on which he has worked and regarding thework and conduct of the workman . Another letter Ex . W.5 iswritten by Principal Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya. Devrala to the DeputyDirector , Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiu. Jaipur on 9-12-92 with the same request for sanctioning one group " J)" post for adjustment of Shri Subey Singh .
Another letter dated 12-12-92 written by the Principal Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya to the Deputy Director . Jarpur is on record as Ex . W.6 containing the same request for sanctioning group D post in General Category for adjustinent of the workman Shri . Subey Singh . It is a detailed letterwhich reflects the nature beluvior and attitude ofthe workman while he servedthe Vidyalaya . Jix. W. 7 is the relieving order of the workmandated 30-6-92 ix . W. 8 is the appointment letter from 4-8-92 given by Principal , Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya . Devrala , Ex . W.9 & W 1th are also the letter written by Principal , Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya to the DeputyDirector . Navodaya Vidalaya Samiti , Jaipur on 7-10-93 and 1-11-92 respectively .
Learned counsel for the management has filed the written arguments as well . Opportunity for oral arguments was given to the parties . The main contention of learned council for the management is that when the workman sought the regularization of the service he was over- aged. Thus . being over- aged his case was not rightly considered and accordingly he was terminated from the service. Learned counsel for the management has retied upon a case law [ भाग 11 खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
published in 2007 (2 ) Supreme Court Cases (L& S) 534 Trimała Triupati Devasthanams Vs. K. Jyotheswarra Pillai and another. This is the law on the relaxation of the age and learned counsel for the management has rightly said that in para no. 7 of the claim statement Shri Subey Singh has mentioned that he was over-aged and he cannot sought regularization of his services . In this regard, I will prefer to mention thathe question for adjudication before this Tribunal is not regarding the regularization of the services of the workmen but to bolld whether his termination from the services is legal and justified. There is no iota of evidence on record that at thetime ofhis initial appointment to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, the workman was over- aged and his initial appointment was not valid . Accordingly the case law referred by learned counsel is not applicable in the instant case.
Learned counsel for the management has also relied upon a case law published in 2008 ( 1 ) Supreme Court Cases 683Additional Manager , Aravali Golf Club and another Vs. Chandarhass and another , which is on creation of post. It has been held by the Hon'ble the Apex Court that creation of and sanction of posts is the prerogative to the Legislative Authority and not of the Courts. Again the question before thisTribunal is not for creation of posts but for the justification of the termination of the workman . Accordingly, this case law is not applicable in the instant case . The another case law reliedupon by the learned counsel of the management isBala Krishna Behera and another V's. Satya Parkash Dass, which is on the power ofthe High Court by the writ of mandamusto direct the appointment of a person against the post which has been abolished . Again the question before this Tribunal isregarding the justification of the termination order and the case law referred by the leamed counsel for the management is not applicable . In Krishana Bhagya Jal Nigam Limited Vs. Mohamad Rafi 2007( 1 ) SCC ( L&S ) 679 Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the burden of proof lies on the workman to prove that he has work continuously for 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his termination and he was paid the wages for 240 days he worked.
Accordingly, the workman has to prove that he has worked for 240days continuously in the preceding year from the date ofhis termination and he was paid wages for that period.
From the pleadings of the parties and the affidavit they filed, it is clear that the workman Shri Subey Singh was appointed vide Ex . W.2 on 12-4-91 on daily wages at the rates prescribed by Deputy Commissioner w.e.f. 12-4-91 and the wages were to be paid for the days of duty only and not on the monthly basis . The wages were paid on the days he worked is explained by the Princiapl , Navodaya Vidyalaya in his cross-examination on 13-9-2006 that the payment to the workman used to be given after completion of month . Thus , as per the evidence of Shri Ompal Thomar , Principai Incharge of Jawahar Navodya Vidyalaya and the appointment letter
5425
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
dated12-4-91, the workman was paid for the days he worked but the mode ofpayment was monthly. From Exs . 4, 5, 6,78 8which are the original letters filed by the workman, it is clear that the workman worked from 12-4-91 to 30-6-92 . He was again re -appointed on 1-7-92 and worked up to 13-8-92 . Meaning thereby, there was no break in his subsequent appointment . Thereafter , he was further re - appointed on 14-8-92, though he resumed duty on 17-8-92 and worked up to 15-12-92, when he was relieved from the duties by Principal Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Devrala, vide letter dated 15-12-92 Ex. W.2.
There is one more comention of learned counsel for the management that the M.W. 1 has categorically stated in his evidence that in summer and winter breaks Shri Subey Singh had not worked. I am unable to accept this contention of the management because the vary letters of the managementwhich are filed by the workman shows that the workman was working in mid December and on 19-6-92 . Εκ . W7 is the relieving order given by the Principal , Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya , Devrala containing the contents that Shri Subey Singh was engagecl on daily wages in this Vidyalaya on 12-4-91 ( F.N. ) and was relieved w.e.f. 30-6-92 (A.N) . Month of June is the period of summer vacations on which as per the relieving order given by the management , the workman has worked .
It is true that workman has to prove that he had worked continuously for 240 days preceding the date of his terminating and was paid the wages for 240 days accordingly. The statement in the statement of claim and in affidavit will not be sufficient but the workman has to prove the above facts by some cogent evidence. The workman accordingly has filed the original documents to prove this fact.
From the perusal of the record, it is established that initial appointment of the workman was proper. It has not been challenged by the management that the initial appointment of the workman was not regular . He worked continuously from 14-4-91 to 30-6-92 except three days breaks of 14-8-92, 15-8-92 and 16-8-92. Accordingly the total working days comes to480 days approximately . As per the evidence of the management the workman was paid monthly but on the basis ofdates he worked. Accordingly, as per the policy Sundays and Holidays are to be counted while calculating theworking days .The workman was released on 30-6-92 and precedingto the year from the date of his termination , he has completed240 days continuously and was paid there ofl.
Hewas retrenched without any notice or retrenchment compensation. Thus, his termination is illegal in the eyes of law.
Nowthe question is what relief should be given to the workman? As per the starement of the witness of the management, the workman was relieved from the service because, there was no vacancy . There were two vacancies for the casual lahour which were taken away by the 5426
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 /ASVINA 5 , 1930
[PARF 11-- SFC. 3 ( ii ) )
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD
Present: Shri VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer
Dated the 18th day of August , 2008
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. LD.78 /2006
BETWEEN
The General Secretary,
(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana) Singareni Collieries Employees Council , H.No. 18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar , Markandeya Colony , Godavarikhani -505209 .
..Petitioner
AND
The General Manager , M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited Mandamarri Division, Mandamarri -504231
Respondent
APPEARANCES
: NL
For the Petitioner
For the Respondent
Government . Thus , the direction for reinstatement into service willnot be possible as there is no post and as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Divisional Manager, Aravali Golf Club and another Vs. Chandarhass and another (supra) it is not within the preview ofthe Tribunal to direct for the creation of the posts . In such the cases , the Tribunal should award the compensation on reasonable cases and this Tribunal is authorized to do so. The reasonable bases for awarding the compensation includes the amount of retrenchment compensation which would have been given bythemanagement to the workman at the time of his relieving from the services , depreciation in money from the date of removal from the service till the payment of compensation , interest on the amount and the litigation expenses incurred by the workman for the wrongful act of the management . Considering the above facts as the workman has stated in his cross -examination that at the time of his removal from the service he used to get Rs . 835 p.m. and considering all the facts mentioned above, Rs. 25,000 will be the appropriate compensation to be given to the workman . Accordingly , this reference is answered in negative that the action of the management of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya , Devrala in terminating the services of Shri Subey Singh ex - group D daily paid employee w.e.f. 15-12-1992 is not just fair and legat . The workman is entitled for the compensation of Rs 25,000 from the management . Management is accordingly directed to pay Rs. 25.000 within a month . Let the Central Governmtient he informed. File is consigned .
Ms.PA.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Parnguluri , Advocates
G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer
AWARD
नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर , 2008
TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. 1.- 22012/ 11 / 2006 - R ( CM - Hadated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of Singarení Collieries Company 1. imited and their workman under section 100 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the 1.1 ) Act , 19.47 lor adjudication tothis Tribunal . The refereICE IS,
SUEDULE
का. आ. 2720 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की श्रारा 17 के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधानिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ से 78/2006 ) को प्रकाशिन करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल -220012/ 11 /2006 आई आर सीएम -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डंस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008
"Whether the action ise management of Ms. Singareni Collieries Cenparsimited in terminatin the services of Sri Pammadalyalaugh w.c.f. 28-2-2000 us legal and justitied erit ,to strelict the workman is entitled?"
2. The case is called en wetal times after repeated intervals. None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present . Penetrats not suburutted his claim statemem although opportunatics has been given to him. He is absen todas dso . No application for adjournment has been tited & appears that the Petitioner is not interested case S.O. 2720.....In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 78 2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - vuna- Labour Court , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexare , in the Industrial dispute between the managemem ol M's . Singareni Colheries Company Limited and their workmen which was received by the C'entral Govemment on 4-9-2008.
No 1. -2201211 /3006 - IR (CM- AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
3. Accordingly , this sne bong closed and thus Court is of view that the Pehlight descreie respect of the matter in neference. Hence , NII . Award is passed.
[ भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 28th day ofAugust , 2008.
VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer
Appendix ofevidence
Witnesses examined for
thePetitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर, 2008
का, आ. 2721-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी. सौ.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 77/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/12/2006- आई आर( सीएम -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September , 2008 S.O. 2721. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 77! 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure, inthe Industrial dispute between the management ofM / s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workmen, whichwas receivedby the Central Government on 4-9-2008.
[No. L-22012/ 12/2006- IR (CM - II ) AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURTATHYDERABAD
Present: Shri VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Dated the 18th day ofAugust, 2008 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . I.D. 77/2006
BETWEEN
TheGeneral Secretary, (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana) Singareni Collieries Employees Council ,
346701/08-7
5427
भारत का राजपत्र : सित्तम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
... Petitioner H.No. 18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar, Markandeya Colony, Godavarikhanі -505209
AND
The General Manager,
M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited Mandamarri Division , Mandamari -50423 )
Respondent APPEARANCES
: NIL
For the Peritioner
For the Respondent M/ s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri . Advocates
AWARD
TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/ 12/2006 -IR( CM.11 ) dated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their work man under Section 10( 1 )( d ) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal . The reference is ,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action the management of Mis . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Bhukya Pantulu w.c.f. 18-2-1999 is legal and justified? Ifnot, 10 what relief the workman isentitled?"
2. The case is called our several times after repeated intervals . Nonc appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present. Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunities has been given to him . He is absent today also . No application for adjournment has been filed . As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
3. Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court is of view that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect ofthe matter in reference. Hence , ' NIL ' Award is passed.
Dictatedto Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of August, 2008 .
VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for Witnesses examined thePetitioner
for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent NIL 5.
PSMiul
AZ OF INDIA SPISER 27 , 2008 ASVINA 5. 1920
:.
और मंद
2006
2008
2006- s
कुमार गोद दे
san or Sc
Indestuial Dist
the award Rei N. 75 tremsents
2016веm industr al Vibun Labor Cour , daba schowain the Anncs, the indrette macagent أن whack sale the Cotal Governice!
11246208 - TRA AMORGALP De PO CEL GOVERNMENT
Presiting: Officer PS4
G
MALD
The Gecurel st
(Sri Budi S
Singareret , olienesinde soncil ,
11.No.18-190
Markande at
Godavika
Petittone The Gener
M Separary Limites,
Makkunam
Mandermarri S021
Resor Forthe PC
: N.
PAAYS. Sema & For the Respond
Vammalashn kangalan .
Advocales
ABARD
The Government of Musky abour by iS Order No , 1-22012-40 /2006-1R 1 dated 23-11-2006 reterred the following dispa shetasen the management of Singareni Collieries Conqpyry 1.rmitestand their workman under Section 10 ( 1) Vertix adiudicator: to this tribunal . The releris
SCHEDALL
"Whether the action et be management of Ms. Singareni Colherre , Company Limited in terminating the services of St Gaj Mankarte . 10-2-1999 legal and justitied what relief the workm is entitled
2 The case is cailed out severa : titres aher repeared amtervals . None appeared for Petitioner . Respondert's representative present. Petitioner has not subur dis ! claim statement although several opportunatnes has been given 10 him. He is absent odity also No application for adjournment has been like Assech, & appears Puit the Petitioner is not interested to pursue Bis case 3. Accordingly , this case is being closed and this Count is of view that the Fictioner deserves no relief in respect of the matter in telemence Hace Award is passed.
Dictated to Smt . P. Phomtior , Personal Assist tratacribed by her . conected and prepounced by me on this the 18th day of August OOR
VED PRAKANE GAMR. Presiding Officer
Appendin ofevidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Apeses examined for the Respondent NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner Documents marked for the Respondent !
नई दिल्ली, 2008
का, आ. 2723. अधिनियम 19: ( 1947 का ( 4 ) की धारा के अनुसः मेंन्द्रीय सरकार एस.मो. भी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्धक और कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुवन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्यन्द्रीय सरकार आंगिक अधिकरण , हैदरावाद पंचक प्रकाशन करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार का 2018 के प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल- एम ।।।। अजय कुमार गौड़ इस्क अधिकारी [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008 S.O. 2723. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 76/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management ofM/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workmen, whichwas receivedby the Central Government on 4-9-2008.
[No. L-22012/49/2006- IR(CM- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD
Present: Shri VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Dated the IBth day ofAugust, 2008 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. I.D. 76/2006
BETWEEN
TheGeneral Secretary
...Petitioner (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana) Singareni Collieries Employees Council , H.No.18-3-90/3 , GaneshNagar Markandeya Colony , Godavarikhani-505209.
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited Mandamarri Division , Mandamarri -504231
...Respondent
APPEARANCES
: NIL
For the Petitioner
For the Respondent : M/ s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates
AWARD
TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L -22012/49/2006- IR (CM - II ) dated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication 10 this Tribunal. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Md. Allauddin w.e.f.
5429
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
24-7-1998 is legal andjustified? If not, to what relief theworkman is entitled ?"
2. The case is called cut several times atred repsaed intervals. None appeared for Petitioner Responsi epresentative present . Petitioner has not suboniited Sos claira statemenı although sever opportunities inas teen given to him . IHe is aburnt today also happline for adjournment has been Fled. As such , it appears t רןבל Petitioner is not interested 20 purane dus CRI .
3. Accordingly, bis case is being closed and thi Court is of view that the Petitioner deserves ro retieť in respect ofthe matter in reference. Hence, 'Nil . Award is passed.
Dictrred to Smt. P. Pihani Gowri , f'ersonal Assistant , transcribed by her , corrected and promourced by me on thís the Tet day of Argut 2008 .
VED PRAKASH GAUR, Preseli Olfacer Appendix ofevidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witness.sexami..cd for the Respondent
NIL.
NIL
Documents marked for thePetitioner Documents marked for iba kosomient
NIL
नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर 2008
का.आ 2724,-औद्योगिकः विशद अधिनियम, 1957 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण पें. कंन्द्रीय सरकार असकी सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच सध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्दीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-22012/21/2006- आई आर सी एम- ॥ अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September , 2008 S.O. 2724. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 73-2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - 1.abou Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure . in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Mis . Singareni Colleries Company Limited, and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008.
No. L -22012/ 21 / 2006- IR ( CM - II ) |
AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 5430
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 27, 2008/ASVINA 5, 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL COVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD
Present : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 18th day of August, 2008 Industrial Dispute Na. 1.D.73/2006
BETWEEN
The Cienerate retary
(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana)
Singareni Collieries Employees Council , H.No. 18-3-903, Ganesh Nagar Markandeya Colony ,
[PART 11-Sec.3 (ii)] Appendix of evidence
NIL Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर, 2008
Petitioner
Godavarikhani - 505209
AND
The Ger.eral Manager,
M/ s. Singareni Colmerics Company Limited, Mandvision ,
Mandamer 04231
का.आ 2725.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदरावाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 74/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/47/2006- आई आर ( सी एम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 4th September , 2008
Respondent
APPEARANCES
NILL
For the Petitioner :
For the Respondent Mis . P.A.VV. S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates .
AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour. Order No. 1.-22012-21 / 2006 - IR ( CM - II ) , dated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Colheries Company limited amd their workman under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the 1 12. Act . 1947 for adjudicationto this Tribunal . The reference is :
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Durgam Ramulu w.e.f. 16-12-1998 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"י
2 The case is called out several times after repeated intervals . None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present . Petitioner has not submitted his claim staternent although several opportunites has been given to him. He is absent today also. No application for adjournment has been filed. As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case .
3.Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court is of view that the Pentover deserves no relief in respect of the matter in reterence . Hence , NII Award is passed.
Dictated to Sint . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of August . 2008
VEO PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer 8.O. 2725. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 74/2006) of the Central Government Industria ] Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M /s . Singareni Colleries Company Limited, and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008 .
No.1-22012/47/ 2006 - IR (CM-II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Oflicer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM -LABOUR COURT ATHYDERABAD
Present : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer. Dated the 18th day of August , 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 1. D.74/2006 BETWEEN
TheGeneral Secretary
(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana ) Singareni Collieries Employees Council . H.No. 18-3-90/3 ,Ganesh Nagar Markandeya Colony. Godavarikhani - 505209
. Petitioner AND
TheGeneral Manager .
M's. Singareni Collieries Company limited Mandamarri Division.
Mandamarri - 50-4231
..Respondent
APPEARANCES
NIL .
ForthePetitioner:
5431
भारत का राजपन्न : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5. 1930
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008 For the Respondent: M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma& Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri , Advocates .
AWARD
S.O. 2726. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 72/2006) of the Central Government industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited , and their workmen, which was received by the Central Governmenton 4-9-2008.
[No. L-22012 / 18/ 2006- IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, Order No. L-22012/47/2006- IR (CM -II) , dated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under section 10 ( 1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,
ANNEXURE
SCHEDULE
BEFORE THE CENTRALGOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD
Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer "Whether the action of the management of M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Sandra Chandrajah w.e.f. 9-3-1999 is legal and justified? If not, towhat relief the workman is entitled ?"
Dated the 18th day of August , 2008 ladustrisL.Dispute No. I.D.72/20106 BETWEEN
TheGeneral Secretary
1
2.The case is called out several times after repeated intervals. None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present. Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunities has been given to him . He is absent today also. No application for adjournment has been filed . As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana), Singareni Collieries Employees Council , H.No. 18-3-90/3 ,GaneshNagar Markandeya.Colony, Godavarikhani -505209 ....Petitioner
AND TheGeneral Manager , M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited. Mandamarri Division,
3. Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court is of view that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect ofthe matter in reference . Hence, 'NIL' Award is passed.
Mandamarri -504231 Respondent
APPEARANCES Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of August, 2008 . 1
For thePetitioner ; For the Respondent
VED PRAKASH GAUR , PresidingOfficer
NIL Mis. P. AV.V. S. Sarina & Vijaya LaxmiPanguluri , Advocates.
Appendix of evidence
AWARD
NIL
NIL
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner: Witnesses examined for the Respondent:
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Lab , Order No. L -22012 / 18/2006- IR ( CM - 1 ) , dated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company limited and their worknur under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the 1.10. Act , 1947 [ oradjudication to this Tribunal . The reference is ,
SCHEDULE Documents marked for the Respondent NIL
नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर, 2008
"Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Compariy Limited in terininating the services of Sri Durgum Rheemaบ่แ w.e.f. 10-9-2001 is legal and justified? I'not ,to whan relief the workınan is entitled "" का.आ. 2726, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 72/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
2. The case is called out several times aller repeated intervals. None appeared for Petitioner . Respondent's representative present , Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement ahhough several opportunities has been given to him . He is absent today also . No application for adjournment has been fled . As such, it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to purstre this case.
[सं. एल-22012/ 18/2006- आई आर ( सी एम -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी 5432
THE GAZETTE OF INDA: SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 ASVINA 5. 19
3. Accordingh, this case is being closed and thistou is ofview that the Petitioner deserves no refiet in resp . of the matter in reference . Hence .' NH . " Award is passed Dictard to Semt P. Phani Gouri . Personal Avestant transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me an this the 18th day of August , 2008 .
VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingVilicer Apperolix of evidence
NI Witnesses examined for the Petitioner :
Witnesses examined for the Respondent . Nli .
Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL
Documents smarked for the Respondent NIL ,
नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ 2727, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, कंन्द्रीय सरकार एस.ग्गी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधितंत्र के संबद्ध निचांजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक चित्राद में केंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्यागिक आभिकरण , हैदरावाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 79/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4 9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एट-22012/ 13 / 2006 - आई आर सीएम अजय कुमार गौड़ , इंस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 4th Septentber , 2008 S.O. 2727. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ). the Curi Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 7 : 2006 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-! hour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the inchstrial dispute between the management of Ms. Sigreni Collieries Company Limited, and their workman , which was received by the Central Goventnem on 4-9-2008 .
[ No. 1. -22012:13-2006 - TR ( CAM -1 ] AJAY KUMAR GALUR . Desk Cite
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAI , TRIBUNAL CUM - 1.ABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD
Present : Shri Ved Prakash Gane , Presiding Offler Dated the 18th day of August, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. L. D. 79/2006
BETWEEN
The General Secretary
(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana ) ,
Singareni Coilernes Employees Council . H.No. 18-3-903 , Ganesh Nagar. Markandeya Colony , Godavarikhani - 505200
....Puritater AND
The General Manager.
M's. Singareni Collieries campams Fanited
Mandomarti Division ,
Mandamarri - 504231
Respundent
APPEARANCES
For the Petitioner : MIL.
For the Respondent : MS.P.A.VV. S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Pangulturi , Advocates,
AWARD
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, by its Order No. 1-22012 / 13 2006-1R ( CM - 11 ) , dated 23-10-2006 referred the following di pitte between the management f Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the 1.D. Act . 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal . The reference is
SCREDO
"Whether the action of the management of M's. Singareni Colliernes Company Liraited in terminating the sewnesef Sn Buky a Balya wc. 26- 2-1998 is legal and justulled ? not to what relief the workman is entitled ?"
2. The case is caddont several times after repeared intervals . None appeared Le Petitioner , Respond ข้าว ป representative present . Petitioner las not submitted his claim statement aithonen several opportunities has been given to him . He is absen: woday aisu. No application for astjournment has been reked As such , it appears that alis Petnioner is not intreskiot in pursue this case .
3. Accordingly. this case is being closed and this Court is of view that the Petitioner deserves no relict in respect of the matter in eterze . Bence , NM , Award is passed.
Dictatedto Sint . P. Phon : ( rowri , Personal Assistan! transcribed by her , conected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of August 2008
VED PRAKASH GAUR . Presidme fire Appender of es idenew
Witnesses examined for the Petener . Witnesses examined for the Respondem : NO .
Documents marked for thePetitioner Documents marked for the Respondent N!!
אהनई
का.आ 2728,-कधनियम 1947 19: का 14 ) की श्राग 17 के अन्दरी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियं कर्मकारों के चौन अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विचारकरगिक अधिकरण, [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 80/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/10/2006- आई आर( सी एम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September , 2008
S.O. 2728. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 80/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workman , whích was received bythe Central Government on 4-9-2008.
[No. L-22012/10/2006- IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, DeskOfficer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD
PRESENT : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 18th day of August, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. I.D.80/2006
BETWEEN
.. Petitioner The General Secretary (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana) Singareni Collieries Employees Council , H.No. 18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar Markandeya Colony, Godavarikhani -505209
AND
The General Manager, M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited Mandamarri Division , Mandamarti -504231
Respondent
APPEARANCES
NIL
For the Petitioner :
For the Respondent : M/s . P.A.V.V. S. Sarma &
Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri , Advocates
AWARD
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by itsorder No. L-22012/ 10/2006-18 ( CM -II ) , dated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal . The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Mrs. Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Madoti Raju w.e.f.
5433
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
9-10-1998 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? "
2.The case is called out several times after repeated intervals. None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present. Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunities has been given to him . He as absent today also . No application for adjournment has been filed . As such, it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
3. Accordingly , this case is being closed and this Court is of view that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect of the matter in reference . Hence. Nil . Award is passed.
Dictated10 Smt . P. Phani Gowri . Personal Assistant transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of August , 2008 .
VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner : Witnesses examined for the Respondent : NII . NIC .
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent NIL
नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ 2729, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 82/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/15/2006 - आई आर ( सी एम ।। ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008 S.O. 2729.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govemmenthereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 82/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Mis . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008 ,
[No. L-22012/ 15/2006- IR ( CM - II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officci ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD
Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , Presiding Officer . Dated the 18th day of August, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 1. D. 82/2006 5434
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 /ASVINA 5, 1930
BETWEEN
The General Secretary
(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana )
Singareni Collieries Employees Council , H.No. 18-3-90/3 , GaneshNagar Markandeya Colony ,
Godavarikhani -505209
[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
...Petitioner
AND
The General Manager ,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited Mandamarti Division , Mandamari - 504231
का. आ. 2730. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 66/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[र्स. एल -22012/318/ 2005 - आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008
Respondent
APPEARANCES
NIL
For the Petitioner :
For the Respondent : M/ s . P.A.V.V. S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates
AWARD
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour,by its Order No. L -22012/ 15 /2006- IR (CM- II), dated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 för adjudication to this Tribunal . The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M / s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Baneni Suryanarayana w.e.f. 27-9-2002 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workınan is entitled ? "
2. The case is called out several times after repeated intervals . None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present . Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunities has been given to him Ife as absent today also. No application for adjournment has been filed . As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
3. Accordingly , this case is being closed and this Court is of view that the Petitioner deserves no relielom respect of the matter in reference Hence . 'NII . Award is passed.
Dictated to Stmt , P. Phani Gowri . Personal Assistant transcribed by her . corrected and pronounced by ene on thus the 1811 day of Angust. 2008 .
VED PRAKASH GAER. Presiding Officer Appendix ofevidence
Wihtesses eunined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondeni NIL . NII .
Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL
Doeuments marked for the Respondent Nil .
S.O. 2730. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 19.47 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Mis . Singareni Collieries Company Limited . and their workmen, which was received by the , Central Government on 4-9-2008.
[No. 1.-22012/318/ 2005 -IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL.GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT , HYDERABAD
PRESENT : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur . Presiding Officer .
Dated the 18th day of August , 2008 Industrial Dispute No. L.D. 66/2006
BETWEEN
The General Secretary
Petitioner (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana) Singareni Collieries Employees Council . H.No. 18-3-90 /3 , Ganesh Nagar Markandeya Colony. Godavarikhani -505209
AND
The General Manager , M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company limited Mandamarti Division . Mandamarri - 504231
Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the Petitioner :
For the Respondent:
Nil. MAPA.V V.S Sarana & Vijaya Laini Panguluri , Advocates
AWARD
t. The CGovernment ofIndia. Ministry of Labun. by itsOrder No. 1-220123185 - IRCM - ITI , daned 9-10-200 referred the following dispute between the management ol Singaroni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under Section 10 ( 1 ) tdrukthe ).D . Act, 1947 toradjudication this Tribunal . The reference is , [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Thogari Venkati w.e.f. 26-9-2001 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"
2.The case is called out several times after repeated intervals. None appeared for Petitioner . Respondent's representative present . Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunites has been given to him . He is absent today also . No application for adjournment has been filed. As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
3. Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court is of view that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect ofthe matter in reference. Hence , ' NIL' Award is passed.
Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her , corrected and pronouncedby me on this the 18th day of August , 2008.
VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendix ofevidence
NIL Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
NIL Witnesses examined for the Respondent
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का.आ 2731. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 81/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-22012/ 14/2006- आई आर ( सो एम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी 4
New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008 S.O. 2731. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 81/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M /s . Singareni Collicries Company Limited, and their workmen , which was receivedby the , Central Government on 4-9-2008 .
[No. 1-22012/ 14/2006 - IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 346701/08-8
5435
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT ATHYDERABAD
PRESENT: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 18th day of August , 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 1.D. 81/2006 BETWEEN
TheGeneral Secretary,
(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana)
Singareni Collieries Employees Council, H.No. 18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar,
Markandeya Colony,
....Petitioner Godavarikhani -505209
AND
TheGeneralManager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited
Mandamarri Division ,
....Respondent Mandamarri -504231
APPEARANCES
NIL
Forthe Petitioner :
For the Respondent : M/s . P.A.V.V. S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri ,
Advocates
AWARD
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, Order No. L-22012 / 14/2006 -IR (CM- II ) , dated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under section 10 ( 1 ) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal . The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in Lerminating the services of Sri Dasari Srinivas w.e.f. 28-2-2000 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relics the workman is entitled ?"
2.The case is called out several times after repeated intervals . None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present. Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunites has been given to him . He as absent today also. No application for adjournment has been filed. As such, it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case .
3. Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court ofview that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect ofthe matter in reference . Hence , ' NIL ' Award is passed. Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of August, 2008
VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer Appendix ofevidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent NII . NIL Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent NIL $436
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 /ASVINA 5 , 1930
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ला, 4 सितम्बा, 2008
"Whether the action of the management of Cantonment Board, Patna in not fixing the pay - scale of Shri Ram Swaroop , Assistant Pump Driver Grade 11 in the pay scale of Rs .950-20-1150-25-1500 legal and justified? And further, whether this has led to wrong calculation of the pension and other retirement dues? If yes to what relief the retired workman Shri Ram Swaroop is entitled to?"
का. आ. 2732, योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का (4 ) की धारा 17 अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्टांन्फैंट बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संचं नियोजकों और उनके क्रर्मकारों के बीच्च, अनुबन्ध में निर्देि औद्योगिक विवाद में औधोगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायन्नय. पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 91/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करतो है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Subsequently vide order No. L - 1301 1/1/2003 IR( DU ), dated 17-8-2004 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi transferred the Reference Case to this Tribunal to dispose of the same according to law.
[मं. एल -13011/ 1/2003- आईआर ( ही.यू. ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डंस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi.the4th September, 2008
S.O. 2732 In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947114 of 1947) , the Central Government heroby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 91/2004) of the Industrial tribunal Labour Court , Patna as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cantonment Board and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008 .
[No. L-13011./1/2003-IR(DU ) ] JAY KUMARGAUR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNE SHRAM BHAWAN , BAILEY ROAD, PATNA
Beierence Case No. 91 of 2004
No. jo (1 ) of 2004
2.Theparties appeared on notice and filed the wristen statement and thestatement ofclaim respectively.The case of the workman as made out in the statement of claint is That he was appointed on the post of Khalasi ( Lower Cirade servant) under the management of Cantonment Board, Danapur Cantonment on 1-11-1956 . The workman was promoted to the post of Assistant Pump Driver on 4-12-1963 and he worked on that post till 22-5-1968 and thereafter he was reverted back to the post ofPump Khalasi . Further , the contention of the workman is that he was promoted to the post ofAssistant Pump Driver in the Scale of Rs . 375-480 on 25th July, 1986 whereas Shri Saryug Shah , an employee junior to him was given promotion in the scale of Rs . 480-680 , The workman claimedthe Scale of Rs. 480-680 w.e.f. 1986 but the management paid no heed to his representations . Further according to the workman the scale of Rs . 480-680 was made effective w.e.d. 1-3-1986 vide Bihar Government Finance Department Resolution No. 3 P.A. R. 1/ 86-2 WI-dated 20-1-1987 . Agam the said scale of Rs . 480-680 was revised to the scale of Rs . 95th- 1500 but the workman was not given the said scale . The workman was made to retire on 31-7-1992 after completion ofthe age of 58 years . The workman claims the benefit of scale Rs . 950-1500 besides other retiral benefits.
Between the management of Cantonment Board , Danapur Cantonment and their workman Ram Swaroop, resident of village- Turhatoli , P.O. Datapur , Patna.
For the Managemeent : Shri Satish Kumar Agarwal and Shri BinayKumar, Advocates .
For the Workman Stiri Rajesh Sahay, Advocate.
Present
Vasudeo Ram , Presiding Officer. Industrial Tribunal. Patna
AWARD
Patna, dated the 27th August , 2008
3. The contention of the management is that the workman Shri Ram Swaroop was appointed on 1-1-1956 in the pay scale ofRs . 17-25 per month as IVth grade employee. He was promoted as Assistanı Pump Driver w.el. 1-12- 1963 in the pay scale ofRs . 35-45-55 per month . The workman on completion of 10 years of service was given First Time Bound Promotion on the post of Pump Driver Grade II w.e.f. 1-1-1986 . He was given 2nd Time Hound Promotion with effect from 1-4-1989 in the pay scale of Rs . 825-15-900- 20-1200 with other allowances The workman superannuated from service with effect from 31-7-1992 on the monthly salary of Rs . 1160. The management further contends that Sarvug Sah was appointed directly on the post of Assistant Pump Driver บท 31-12-1981 whereas workman Ram Swaroop was promoted from the post of khalasi to the post of Assistant Pump Driver in 1986, Further according to the management Finance Department Resolution dated 20-1-1987 will not Byadjudication Ordet No. 1.- 13011/ 1 / 2003 [ R( DI ), dated 6-7-200-1 the Governem of India , Ministry of Labour. New Dethi under clause ( d ) 1 Sub - Section ( 1 ) and Suh- Section ( 2A ) of Section 1G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 19.17 ( hereinafier called the Act for brevity ) referred the dispune between the enangemeul of Cantonment Board. Danapor Cantonment and their workman Ram Swaroop of Village- Torhatoli . P.1 ) . Danapur , Patna to Central Govertinent Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Dhanbad No. 2 fon adjudication on the following.
5437
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008 / आश्विन 5 , 1930
[भाग ।। खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
be applicable to the employees of Cantonment Board and as such the workman is not entitled to the salary ofRs . 480-680 with effect from 1-3-1986 as claimed by the workman.
4. Upon the pleadings of the parties and in view of the rerms of reference the following points arise out for decision:
statement of provisional pension and gratuity (Ext . M.8 ) , receipts of payment of provision ! gratuity, rarned louve encashment etc. to the workanan ( Ext. Ma to ext. MIS ) the plotocopy of his se vice book ( Ext. M'6 ) which are not disputed and hence do not require discussion in detai . M.W.2 has stated that the workman had raised the dispute before the Labour Court and the verdict givenby the A.I..C. (Central) Patna-cum - Conciliation officer is Evi, W/2 , MW. 3 has also stated that the workthan has been given all the retiral benefits. The workman retired in 1992 at the age of 58; the retirement age was enhanced to 60 years inthe you 2000,
(i) Whether the action of the management of Cantonment Board, Patna in not fixing the Pay Scale of Shri Ram Swaroop , Assistant Pump Driver Grade II in the Pay Scale ofRs. 950-20-1150-25- 1500, legal and justified ?.
( ii) Whether the fixation of pay of Shri Ram Swaroop in the Scale of Rs . 950-1500 has led to wrong calculation of his pension and other retiral benefits ?,
(iii) What reliefor reliefs Shri Ram Swaroop is entitled 10 ?
FINDINGS
Point Nos . ( 1) & (ii) :
5. Both the parties have adduced oral as well as documentary evidence in support of their respective contentions. The management has examinned altogether thret witnesses namely Brind Kishore (M.W.1 ), an Accountant in Cantonment Board, Nagendra Kumar Gupta (M.W.2), Cashier in Cantonment Board and Kamleshwar Pathak (M.W.3) a retired U.D.C. of Cantonment Board. The management has filed pohotocopy of provisional pension andGratuity Form ofthe workman (Ex1 . M), photocopy of reciept (Exts . M/ 1 to M/5 ) , of service book of workman (Ext . M/6) and photocopy of application for commutation of pension (Ext . M/7 ) . As against that one Chhote Lal Paswan (W.W.1 ) retired Pump Khalasi of Cantoninent Board besides Ram Swaroop ( W.W..2) the workman has been examined on behalf of the workman . The workman has filed photocopy of order No. 127 dated 25-7-1986 (Ext . W) photocopy of application for commutation ofpension (Ext. W/ 1 ) , photo copy ofdecision ofA.L.C. (Central ), Patna dated 14-3-1974 (Ext. W/2) and photocopy of letter dated 12-1-1999 of Cantonment Executive Officer (Ext . W/3 ).
7. W.W.1 hes stated that he had seen Ran, Swarpop working as Pump Khalasi, Ram Swaroop , W.W.2 , has stated that he was appointed on 1-11-1956 on the post of Pum Khalasi and he was gerting Rs. 40 as pay and allowances . Hewas promoted to the post ofAssistant Pump Driver 4-12-1963 but on 22-5 1968 he was reverted to the post of Pump Khalasi and his pay was also reduced to that of Pump Khalasí. He raised the dispute before the Assa . Labour Commissioner (Central ). Patna and on 14-3-1971 was an agreement (Ext . W/2 ) according te which he shoute have been given the scale of Rs . 950-1500 bat the management did not give the same . Arcordingly , sing workman claims scale of Rs . 950-1500 and ther benef on that scale . From persual of Ext. Wi2 ir appears that the dispute with regard to reversion of workman Ram S was raised before the Labour Enforcement Officer ( Cemrel). Patna -cum -Conciliatiion Officer and the same terms of settlement that the management agreed to take Troussary action to create an additional post of Asst. Pump Driver in its next Board mecting and to obtain sanction of the Central Command, Lucknow . It was also agreed that the case of Shri Ram Swaroop will be considered and priority will he given in the matter of regularisation to the cadre of Assi Pump Driver. It was decided to implement the above agreement within three months . Nothing has been filed on behalf of the parties to show as to whether steps for implementation of the said agreement was taken and with what result . The workman in his statement before this Tribunal has stated that he was not given the scale as per agreement . The said Ext . W/ 2 does not show that it was an agreement for giving scale to the workman.
8. The workman claims that the scale ofRs . 950-1500 is the revised pay scale ofRs . 480-680 . The workman in the statement of claim has claimed that Saryug Sah, an employce junior to him was given the scale of Rs. 480-680 hut he being the senior in service to Shri Saryug Sah was given the scale of Rs . 375-480, but the workman in his statement before this Tribunal is silent on that point and has not whispered anything on that point . However , a photocopy ofOrder No. 127 dated 25-7-1986 has been filed on behalf ofthe workman and has been marked Ext . W from personal ofwhich it appears that Shri Saryug Sah was in Pump Driver Grade [ I from 21-2-1981 and was promoted to Pump Driver 6.M.W. I has stated that the workman Ram Swaroop was appointed on 1-11-1956 on the post of Pump Khalasi , hewas promoted in 1986 and retired in 1992. The said facts are not disputed facts. M.W.I has further stated that the workman has been paid all his dues and nothing is left to be paid to him. In his cross - examination the workman has got exhibited his documents Exts . W and W/ I.I may mention here that photocopy of application for commutation of pension has been filed by both the parties , it is Ext. W / 1 on behalf of the workman and Ext . M/ 7 on behalf of the management but commutation of pension is not the issue before this Tribunal in reference for adjudication . M. W.2 has proved certain documents namely the copy of the 5438
PART Stc. ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 / ASVINA 5 , 1930
Point No. ( iii) :
10. Keeping in view the discussions made above and the finding arrived an on Point Nos ( i ) and ( ii ) I find and hold that the workman is not entitled to any relief claimed for. This porn is deeded accordingly .
Grade 1 in the scale of Rs . 480-680 whereas this workman who was Pump Khala:: i from 1-11-1956 was consequently promoted to Pump Driver Grade Il in the scale of Rs . 375- 480 in the vacancy caused by promotion of Shri Satyug Sah. I may mention here that the workman (W.W ? ) in his statement before this Tribunal has stated that he wits promoted in the post of Assistant Pump Driver v4-12-1963 but he was inverted to the post of Pump Khalasi on 22-5-1968 and his pay was als reduced to that of Pump Klalasi . Iinder that the workman cannut Claim the 30 of ky 481-58 consequently of Rs . 950-1500 on the basis of being senior to Shri Saryug Sah
11. Under the circumstances discussed above lind and hold that the action of the amanagement of Cantonmem Board, Patna in not fixing the pay scale of Shri Rain Swaroup . Assistant Pump Driver Grade 11 in the scale of Rs . 950-1500 is legal and justified . Further , I find that this has not led 10 wrong calculation of the pension and other retirement dues I also find that rebred workman Shri Ram Swaroop is not entitled to any reliel.
12. And that is my award .
V. RAM . J'residing Officer
नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2733. ओद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धाग । : कं अनुमराण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबंद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बाँच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट आंद्यांगिक विवाद में आंद्यांगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय पुर्ण के पंच्चाट ( संदर्भ सं. को प्रकाशित करती है , जो कंन्द्रीय मरकार को 4-9-20008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल-4001 2:23 :200804-आईआर डीयू) । अजय कुमार गौड़. डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delt : 1 . the 4th September , 2008
S.O. 2733. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industmal Tribunal . Labour Cour !, Pane now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008.
[No. 1-10012/23/ 200-1-1800 ) AJAY KUMAR GAUR. Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , IFI LABOUR COURT, PUNE AT PUNE
Reference ( IDA) No 650 2004
Esh . No. 31
Bharat Sanchar Nigaon Lunited
Bajirao Road , Pune 410042
1st Party
AND
Ramesh S. Khaladkar Post Nandgaon
Tal . Daund , Pune
4. tioth the panies have tiled dhe copy of memoran ฝน สา of settlement between the Cantonment Board and their workman 1969. 1though not nmarked Exhibit ) which are on record Necordingly to para 7 of the said settlement "in the event Trevision of pay scale by a state Govemmeu atter 1-9-19 revised pay scale and the formula for tixation of pass the revised pay scale as specified by the State Govt Shell statis mutandis be made applicable to the Cantonment Board employees in the Stare Government employees According to the said settlement ( at serial No. 2) the existing designation of Asst. Pump Driver Pump Driver was proposed to be designated as Pump Driver Grade II which will be equivalent to Asst Pump Mistri of Bihar Government atid the sam : seale was to be given and the existing designation of Permp Driver ( at serial No. 22 of memorandumiwas proposed to be designated as Pump Driver Grade & which is equivalent to Truck Driver in Bibar Government photocopy of Bihar Gazette dated 14-2-1996 has been filed which shows that Truck Driver in Bihar Goverament ( Pump Driver Grade 1 in Cantonment Board ) has been given scale of Rs . 950-1500 . Asst . Pump Driver Grade II. under the circumstances can not claim that scale of Rs . 950-1500 as clanned by the workman The workman has lifed photocoy of letter dated 12-1-1999 of the Cantonment I - secutive Officer . Danapur Cantonment ( F.xtWhywhich shows that the Executive Officer mentioned that the Pump Driver Grade I and Pump Driver Grade II both are performing the same duties and requested that the sanction of GOC - in Chiefmay be obrained to revise the pay scale of Pump Driver Grade II w.ef 1-1-1986 . But nothing has been filed to show that the sanction as requested has been gramed by the GO - in - Chief. Under the circumstances discussed above I find that the workman who retired as Asst . Pump Driver Grade 11 cannot claim the scale of Rs 950-1500 . Under the circumstances discussed above I find and hold that the action of the management of Cantonment Board . Patna in not fixing the pay scale of the workman in the scale of Rs . 950-1500 cannot be said illegal and unjustified . Accordingly I find and held that non- fixation of pay of the workman in the scale of Rs. 950-1500 has not led to wrong calculation of his pension and other retiral benefits . Point Nos . ( 1 ) & ( i ) are decided accordingly.
Ind Party [ भाग- खण्ड (ⅱ)]
Coram
: Shri P.T. Rahule
APPEARANCES
: Mr. Zende - Advocate for 1 Party Mr. A.Y. Shikarkhane - Adv [ Ind Party
AWARD
dated the25th April , 2008
This reference is made by Dy. Commissioner of Labour, Govemment of India , Bharat Sarkar, Ministry of Labour, Shram Mantralaya, New Delhi under section 10( 1 ) and 12(5) read with section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication of industrial dispute between above referred parties regarding the reinstatement with full backwages and incidental benefits .
2.The case of second party in brief is that he was employed in telephone exchange at Nandgaon since 1998. His job was to rectify telephone and cable faults, dig trenches, climb telephone poles and work on telephone lines, to clean the officeetc. He was working under the supervision and control of FTO, Kedgaon - Shri Tewari . He was paidwages by JTO on Form No. SE- 17. His monthly wageswere Rs . 1000 , From 1-1-2000, his services were terminated without any notice and compensation by JTO. Some times his wages were pald in cash without taking his signatures on any paper. He approached to All India SC/ STUnion and persued his case for permanancy . As a result, thePrincipal General Manager of the Ist Party directed his subordinate officers to send details of services record of the Second Party. On 3-1-2003 , the concerned SDE sent the details ofthe service etc. of the Second Party to the General Manager . Meanwhile, this reference came to be sent to the Court wherein the Second Party submitted the claim with the prayer of reinstatement and consequential benefits from 1-1-2000.
3. The claim of the Second Party has been resisted by the First Party by filing written statement at Ext .7. The very employer -employee relationship has been denied by the First Party. It has been contended by the First Party that the Second Party was never in the employment of the FirstParty as alleged. With this , the entire claim has been deniedby the First Party and prayed for rejection of the reference.
4. Considering the pleadings and averments, the following points sprout out for determination; the reasonings and findings thereon are as under:
FINDINGS POINTS
1. Whether there was employer-employee relationship between the Second Party and First Party as alleged ? Yes
Yes 2. Whether the Second Party was illegally stoped by the First Party to be in the employment of the First Partyw.e.f. 1-1-2000?
5439
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
3. Whether the Second Party is entitledto the relief claimed ? Yes
Allowed 4. What Award ?
REASONS
5. Point No. 1 : The Second Party- Ramesh Khaladkar has examined himselfat Exh. 17 and three others witnesses - Namdev Laxman Bhame, Dattatray Baburao Bhujbal , and Uttam Dattoba Shelar at Exh , 24, 25, 26 respectively. On the other hand , the Respondent has examined solitary witness- Avinash Keshavrao Dorale at Exh.28 Any of the parties didnot place his reliance on the documentary evidence .
6. It is evident from the testimony of the Second Party Ramesh Khaladkar that since 6-5-1998 , he was working with the department of telecommunication at Nangaon. Hisjob was to connect and repair the telephone. Hewas doing the repair in of underground cables . He was also starting generator in the office. He was doing his duties under the instructions and directions of JTO who was paying him monthly salary of Rs . 1000 by taking signature on his diary till December, 2002. That time JTO was Dwahale and sub- divisional officer was Palewar . Suddenly, he was asked not to come on duty and stopped coming on duty without paying any compensation.
7. In cross examination , he admitted that any appointment letter was not given to him by the First Party. He also admitted that any document has not been produced on recordto show that JTO - Tiwari has given him the job and salary. The suggestions of falsehood have been totally denied by this witness.
8.Mr. Namdev Laxman Bhame - retired employee of this First Party has corroborated the testimony of the Second Partyby deposing that he was appointed in the year 1964 in the department oftelecommunication andwas working till 2000. In the year 1998-99, he was working as a Telephone Lineman at Nangaon Telephone Exchange, where the Second Party - Ramesh Khaladkar was working with him as a Helper. He specifically deposed that as a Helper. The Second Party was repairing telephones, removing faults of cables etc. He also deposed thai the Second Party was working with him as a llelper for five months till he was transferred from Nangaon to lejuri .
9. In cross-examination in respect ofthe Second Party only, the suggestion was put to this witness that he has deposed false that the Second Party was working with him for five months and the same came to be turned down by this witness . Any other adverse admission could not be extracted in the cross - examination from this witness .
10. The other witness Dattatray Bhujbal who is still in the employment of the First Party has also corroborated the testimony of both these witnesses No , I and 2. It is evident from his testimony that in December 1998 , he was transferred to Nangaon Telephone Exchange as a telephone 5440
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 /ASVINA 5, 1930
lineman . The Second Party was working for finding the cables faults and repairing the same He was working at Nangaon Telephone Exchange tili 2000 He also turned down his suggestions of falsehood regarding the Second Party , ile aiso admited that he did not have any documentary evidence to show that the Second Party was working with hinin Nangaon Telephone Exchange. I'xcepts the suggestion of falsehood, any favourable answers could not be extracted frettais witness .
11. The fourtis witness Littarn Shelar has deposed that when he joined his duty in the year 1976 and was transferred to Nangaon Telephone Exchange as a phone mechanic . He was knowing Ramesh Khaladkar as acident ofNangaon and specifically deposed that the Second Party had never worked with him in Nangaon Telephone Exchange. This witness has not at all been cross - examined by the First Party by declining to cross .
On going through the very precise testimony of this witness No. 4. it is clear that though he has deposed that the Second Party had never worked with him in Nangaon Telephone Exchange , he did not depose that the Second Party was not working with the First Party . Moreover, ine has also not deposed the period in which he was working at Nangaon as a phone mechanic and hence , his testimony for want of particular details , cannot be considered against the Second Party. In these circumstances , the first Party was supposed to bring all the details of this witness about when he was working at Nangaon lelephone Exchange and whether in that relevant period , the Second Party was working or not . The First Party has chosen to decline to cross - examixation .
12. Though any documentary evidence has not been produced on record from the side of the Second Party , his testimony has been rightly corroborated by the two witnesses , one of which is the ex- employee of the First Party and one is not presently in the employment of the First Party . Moreover , the testimony of the fourth witness Uttam Shelar , though not supported the Second Party for wun of any details cannot be considered even against this Second Party Khaladkar .
13. On behalt of the First Party Avinash Dorale the Divisional tingmeer has been examined . It is evident from his testimony that as per the directions of his superior, he has come to depuse on behalf of the First Party . Any payment was not made to the Second Party. As per the record , there is nothing to gather that he had ever worked with the First Party
14. In cross - examination , he admitted that he has not produced any power of attorney or authority to depose on behalfofthe First Party . Further. he admitted that some part time casual labours were working in Daund Division. He could not tell the rates or procedure to regularise the labours , but denied that the JTO used to make the payment to the part-time casual labours on vouchers . At the same time , he andmined that the JIO was having inipressed
[PART 11- SEC. 3 (ii) ] account but has deposed that the contract labours were paid by the respective contractors .
He admitted in the cross - examination that some casual workers were regularised in Daund Division by the FirstParty. He could not clarify by which mode those casual labours were regularised . Any documentary evidence has also not been adduced on behalf of the First Party.
15. The learned Advocate-- Mr . A.Y. Shikarkhane . for the Second Party, has submited that the Second Party has completed continuous 240 days in the emloyment of the First Party . But at the same time , while terminating his services, the compliance of Section 25 - F was not done by the First Party by not paying any retrenchment compensation and hence, he be reinstated with continuity of service and full back wages .
Per contra. the learned Advocate Mr. Zende, for the First Party . has submitted that the entire burden was on the Second Party to prove that he had worked with the First Party but for want of any documentary evidence, it could not be proved . He picked the admission given by the witness No. 2 in cross examination that he was the only employee working at Nangaon . He also submitted that JTO -Tiwari had not been examined by the Second Party though he is still in the employment of the First Party. He placed his reliance on the cases of Mukund Staff & Officers Association vis . Mukund Limited (2007 ( 6) ALL MR 312 ] and Secretary, State of Karnataka and others v/ s . Umadevi and others ( AIR 2006 Supreme Court 1806).
16. Having considered the submission tabled by both the sides , considering the ratio of the authority of Mukund Staff Officers Asociation w's . Mukund Limited [2007(6) ALL . MR 312 ) , it is clear that the burden is on the Second Partyto establish it when the claim has been denied by the First Party. The sum and substance of the second authority relied upon by the First Party is that the temporary employees appointed in violation of the constitutional scheme do not have any legal right to be permanently absorbed in the employment. The facts of the instant case being absolutely different than that of the foregoing authority, it cannot be made applicable in the instant case because it has been nowhere taken the stand by the First Party about the appointment by violation of the constitutional scheme .
17. Having considered the foregoing discussions coupled with the corroborated testimony of the Second Party and failure on the part of the first party to adduce any adverse evidence, I dauntlessly reach the conclusion that the employer- employee relationship exists between the Second Party and First Party and as the compliance of Section 25- F was not done by the First Party at the time of termination of services , it is held that he was illegally terminated by the First Party. I therefore, answer this issue Nos . 1 and 2 accordingly .
18. Issue No. 3 : In view of the findings on the issue Nos . 1 and2, keping in view the facts and circumstances of theSecond Party witness , so far as the retrenchment and continuity of service are concerned, the Second Party is 5441
भारत की राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27, 2008/आश्विन 5, 1930
[भाग - खण्ड 3( ii) ]
very much entitled to the reliefs claimed in that regard. However, in the entire evidence, as it has not been brought on record by the Second Party about his efforts to acquire any alternative gainful employment, there being no other option, the Second Party is not at all entitled to the reliefof back wages as clained . I , therefore , answer this issue No. 3 accordingly, and in the aftermath, pass following order :
ORDER
The reference is allowed . The First Party is directed to reinstate the Second Party with continuity of service as a full time casual labour in regular vacancy wherever it is available . The prayer of back wages is rejected . No order as to the cost, Place: Pune
Date: 25-4-2008
P. T. RAHULE, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2734 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबंद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केंद्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 255/99) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -40012/214/1999 -आई आर. (डी.यू.) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September , 2008 S.O. 2734.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. 255/99 ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, No. I , Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Govemment on 4-9-2008,
[No. L-40012/214/ 1999- IR(DU)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 CHANDIGARH
Case No. L.D. 225/99
Sh. Sanjeev Kumar S/o Sh . Mahabir Singh , Rio 733/11 ,
.....Applicant Dairy, Rohtak-124001
Versus
TheDistt. Manager, Telecom, Rohtak- 124001 .
....Respondent APPEARANCES
None
For the Workman:
: None
For theManagement
AWARD
Passed on 20th August, 2008
Central Govt. vide notification No. L -40012/214/ 1999-IR(DU), dated 21-10-1999, has referred the following disputes to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the management ofDeptt. of Telecommunication , Rohtak in terminating the services of Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Driver w.e.f. 14-10- 1996 is legal and justified? If not, towhat reliefhe is entitled?"
2.No one is present, on behalfofworkman . Leamed representative ofthe management is also not present. Since moming this reference has been called number oftimes . At 10,45 am, it was ordered to be placed before this Tribunal once again at 2 p.m. It is 2.30 now and on repeated calls no one is present, in spite of having of full knowledge ofthe proceedings of this reference. The reference is as old as referred to this Tribunal in the year 1999. On repeated calls sincemorning no one is present. Accordingly, the reference is dismissed in default for non- prosecution . Central Government be informed accordingly . File tobe consigned.
Chandigarh. 20-8-2008
G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2735.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केंद्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. । , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 429/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -40012/363/2000- आई. आर. (डी.यू.) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, हेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008 S.O. 2735. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.429/2000) ofthe Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, No. 1, Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofDepartment ofTelecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008.
(No. 1-40012/363/2000- IR( DU)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 5442
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA SEPTEMBER 27, 2008/ ASVINA 5, 1930
PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] ANNEXURE
New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008 BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT- I , CHANDIGARH
Case No. 1.0, 429/2000
Sh .Rajinder Singh S/o Lal Chand. C/o Ashok Sharma. 279 , Sector-3 , Faridabad- 121001
S.O. 2736. -In pursuanceance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 43/2005) ofthe Central Government dustrial Tribunal - cum - 1abour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Lirnited , and their workmen , received bythe Central Government on 4-9-2008.
....Applicant
Versus
No 1.22012118 /2004 - IR( CM - 11 ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer TheGeneral Manager , Telephones , Sector-16 . Faridabad- 121001
...Respondent
ANNEXURE
APPEARANCES
For the workman: None
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD
For the management : None
Present : SHRI VED PRAKASTIGAUR PresidingOfficer AWARD
Dated the 261b lay of August, 2008 Passed on 20th August , 2008
IndustrialDispute No. 1. D. 43/2005 BETWEEN
Central Govt . vide notification No. L-40012/363/2000/ IR(DU) , dated 31-10-2000 , has referred the following disputes to this Tribunal for adjudication:
TheGeneral Secretary , ( Sh . i. Solontun ) . Singareni Collieries Mine Workers Union , Qur . No 703. Opp . Rythu Bazar , Godavrikhani -505209. ...Petitioner "Whether the action of the management ofDeptt . of Telecom in terminating the services of Sh . Rajinder Singh w.c.f. 6-10-1998 is just and legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled? "
AN ! )
The ChiefGeneral Manager , Singareni Cotlieries Company Linmited, Ramagundam-- Division Godavarikhani - 505209 . Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the Petitioner : NJI .
For the Respondent Ms C. Vijay Shekar Reddy & S VijayVenkatesh , Advocates
AWARD
2.No one is present , on behalf of workman , Learned representative of the management is also not present , Since morning this reference has been called number of times .Al 10.45 am, it was ordered to be placed before this Tribunal once again at 2 p.m. It is 2.30 now and on repeated calls no one is present, in spite of having of full knowledge of the proceedings of this reference. The reference is as old as referred to this Tribunal in the year 2000. On repeated cails since morning no one is present. Accordingly, the reference is dismissed in default for non- prosecution . Central Govemment be informed accordingly. File to be consigned .
Chandigarh,
20-8-2008
Q. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर , 2008
TheGovernment of hidia , Ministry of labour by its order No. E-22012/ 118 200-1 IRCML ) dated 11-5-2005 referred the following disputes between the managemem of the Singareni Collierie: Company Limited and their workman under section 10d ) of the 1. D. Act . 19:47 for adjudication to this Tribuna ! The reference is .
SCHEDULE
का. आ. 2736, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एम.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ में. 43/2005 ) कां प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"Whether the act Chief General Manager . M's . Singareni Collieries Company umiled , Ramagundam.I Division , Godavariklusa in ruunaring the services of Sh . Mekala Rama Rat Filler GDK - 1 Incline , Ramagundam Division 1. podavarikhani with effect from 9-7-200lis legal and justitied If not, te what relict the workman is entitled?"
[सं. एल-22012/118/20) 4- आई. आर. ( सी.एम.- II ) ? अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेम्क अधिकारी 5443 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 27 , 2008 /आश्विन 5, 1930
[भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD
Present: SHRI VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer
Dated the 18th day of August, 2008 2. The case is called out several times after repeated intervals. None appeared for Petitioner , Respondent's representative present . Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunities has been given to him. He is absent today also . No application for adjournmnet has been filed . As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
Industrial Dispute No. I. D.84/2006
BETWEEN
3. Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court is ofthe view that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect ofthe matter in reference. Hence, ' NIL' Award is passed.
The General Secretary, (Sh. Bandari Satyanarayana) . Singareni Collieries Employees Council , H. No. 18-3-90/3 . Ganesh Nagar Markandeya Colony, Godavarikhani ...Petitioner 505209.
AND
Dictatedto Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 26th day ofAugust, 2008.
VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer
Appendix ofevidence
The General Manager, M / s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. Mandamarri Division , Mandamarri 504231 ...Respondent
APPEARANCES
Witnessess examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for theRespondent
: NIL
Forthe Petitioner
NIL
NIL
For the Respondent Mrs. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijay Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates Documents marked for the Petitioner
AWARD
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर , 2008
TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/ 17/2006/ IR (CM. - II ) dated 25-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of the Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under section 10( 1 )( d ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal . The reference is ,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action the Management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the service ofSri Nagavath Govindu w.e.f. 18-2-1999 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled? "
का. आ. 2737, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 84/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/ 17/2006-आई.आर. ( सी.एम. - 11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारों
New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008
2.The case is called out several times after repeated intervals. None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present. Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunities has been given to him . He is absent today also. No application for adjournment has been filed. As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
3. Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court is ofthe view that the Petitioner deserves no reliefin respect of the matter in reference. Hence, ' NIL ' Award is passed.
S.O. 2737. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 84/2006) . ofthe Central Government Indus. Tribunai- cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the management of Mis . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workmen . received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008.
Dictated to Smt P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of August , 2008.
[No. L-22012/ 17/2006 - IR(CM- 1 ] ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer 3467G1/08-9 5444
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ASVINA 5, 1930
:
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent
NIL .
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2738. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैद्राबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 83/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । (सं. एल -22012/ 16/2006-आई. आर. ( सी.एम.-[] ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008 S.O. 2738. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Goveminent hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 83/2006) ofthe CentralGovemment Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of M/ s . Singareni Collteries Company Limited , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008.
No. L-22012/ 16/2006- IR( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD
Present : SHRI VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfflcer Dated the 18th August , 2008
IndustrialDispute No. 1. D. 83/2006
BETWEEN
The General Secretary , ( Sh . Bandari Satyanarayana) , Singareni Collierius Employees Council , H. No , 18-3-90/3, Ganesh Nagar Markandeya Colony , Godaverikhani 505209. ...Petitioner
(PART 11-Sec. 3 ( ii )]
AND
The General Manager , M/ s. Singareni Collieries Comраnу Limited Mandamarri Division , Mandamarгі 504231 ...Respondent
APPEARANCES
: NIL
For the Petitioner
For the Respondent M / s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri , Advocates
AWARD
The Government of India Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 22012/ 16/ 2006 /IR (CM. - II ) dated 23-10-2006 referred the following dispute between the management of the Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal . The reference is ,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action the Management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the service of Sri Sandra Rajam w.e.f. 16-4-1998 is legal and justified? If not . 10 what relief the workman is entitled?"
2.The case is called out several times after repeated intervals . None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present. Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunities has been given to him . He is absent today also. No application for adjournment hasbeen filed . As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case , 3. Accordingly , this case is being closed and this Court is of the view that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect of the matter in reference . Hence , ' NIL ' Award is passed.
Dictated to Sat. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day ofAugust , 2008 .
VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer Appendix ofevidence
Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NII,
Documents marked for the Respondent NIL [भाग ॥ - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ] भारत का राजपन्न नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2739.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 44/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/ 119/2004 - आई आर(सीएम-1 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September , 2008 S.O. 2739. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. 44/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008.
[No. L-22012/ 119/2004- IR( CM - I1) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD
Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, PresidingOfficer Dated the 26th day of August, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 1. D. 44/2005
BETWEEN
TheGeneral Secretary, (Sh.G. Soloman) , Singareni Collieries Mine Workers Union, Qtr . No. 703 , Opp. Rythu Bazar, Godavarikhani -505209
.. Petitioner
AND
TheChiefGeneral Manager,. Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Ramagundam- I Division , Godavarikhani -505209
..Respondent APPEARANCES
For the Petitioner : NIL
For the Respondent : M/s . C. Vijaya Shekar Reddy and S.Vijay Venkatesh, Advocates
AWARD
TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour by its order No. L-22012/ 119 /2004-1R( CM- II ) dated 24-5-2005 referred the following dispute between the management of theSingareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman
5445
सितम्बर 27 , 2008/ आश्विन 5 , 1930
under Section 10( 1 )(d ) of the l.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal . The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Chief General Manager, M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Ramagundam - I Division , Godavarikhani in terminating the services of Sri Mardela Majiesham, Ex-Coal Filler, GDK- 6 B Incline, Ramagundam Division-I,Godavarikhan ! with effect from 2-8-2002 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief the warkmin is entitled?"
2.The case is called out several times after raposted intervals. None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present . Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement akhough several opportunities has been given to him. He is absent today also . No application for adjournment has been filed . As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interesied to pursue this caas.
3. Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Courtisofthe view that the Petitioner deserves no reliefin respect of the matter in reference , Honce, NIL ' Award is passed.
Dictatedto Smt . P. Phaani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 26th day ofAugust, 2008.
VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer Appensis of evidence
Witnesses examined for
Petitioner
Witnesses exaruined for Reapondent
NIL
NIL
Doszuments marked for the Peticioner NIL
Dosumenta macked for the Respondent
NL
नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आर. 2740,--औधोगिक विचार अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की बारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सौ. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विकार में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 65/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/316/2005- आई आर ( बीएम-II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 4th September, 2008 S.O. 1740.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 65/2006) of PART 11 S. 30 ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008 / ASVINA 5 , 1930
5446
3.Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court is ofthe view that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect ofthe matter in reference Hence , NII . Award is passed .
the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofM/ s. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 4-9-2008 .
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant. transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of Angust. 2008 .
VED PRAKASH GAUR , Presuding Miter [No. L-22012316/2005 - IR(CM -II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer
Appendix ofevidence
ANNEXURE
Wilnesses examined for
Witnesses examined for
Petitioner Respondent
N
NIL
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INUSTRIAE . TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD
Documents marked for the Petitioner PRESENT : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , Presiding Officer
NII .
Dated the 18th day ofAugust , 2008
Documents marked for the Respondent Industrial Dispute No. 1. D. 65/2006
NII
BETWEEN
नई दिल्ली सितम्बर, 2008
TheGeneral Secretary, (Sri Bandari Sotyanarayana)
Singareni Collezies Employees Council ,
Petitioner
H.No.18-3-90 , Ganesh Nagar Markandeya Colony, Godavarikham -505209.
AND
The General Manager,
का, आ. 2741 , श्रद्योगिक त्रिवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की माग । क अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियाजन्कों और उनक कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निरिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अश्धकरण हैदराबाद के पचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 71/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो कंन्द्रीय सरकार 4.1.4 200 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
M/s. Singareni Collieries
[सं. एल 22032-200/21006 आईआर ( सीएण || ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी Company Limited, Mandamarri Division , Mandamarri -504231 .
..Respondent
New Delhi , the 4th September , 2008 APPEARANCES
NIL
For the Petitioner :
For the Respondent M/s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri , Advocates
AWARD
5.0. 2741. In pursuatice of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Acl. 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 71.2006 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labo Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofM's . Singarem Collieries Co Ltd.. and their workmen , which was received bythe C'enural Government on 4-9-2008 .
No 1.-22012/20/ 2006- IR ( CM - 100 ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR . Desh Officer
ANNEXURE
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by ils order No. L -22012/316/2005-1R ( CM - 11 ) dated 9-10-2006 re- terred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company I,imited and their workman under Sectiortto( 1 )( d ) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudica- tion to this Tribunal . The reference is.
SCHEDULE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS TRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LLAHOURCOURTAT HYDERABAD
"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Naresh Kumar Kori w.c.f. 10-10-2002 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"
PRESENT : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur . Presiding Officer Dated the 18th day of August , 2008. Industrial Dispute No. I. D. 71/2006 BETWEEN
TheGeneral Secretary ,
(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana )
Singareni Collieries Employees Council , 11.No.18-3-90/3 . Ganesh Naga Markandeya Colony . Godavarikhani -505209
...Petitioner 2.The case is called out several times after repeated intervals . None appeared for Petitioner . Respondent's representative present. Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunities has been given to him. Ile is absent today also . No application for adjournment has been filed. As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this casc .
भारत का राजपत्र [ भाग !! - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
AND
The General Manager ,
M/s.Singareni Collieries
Company Limited, Mandamarti Division, Mandamani -504231 .
Respondent APPEARANCES
For the Petitioner : NIL
For the Respondent : M/s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri , Advocates
AWARD
TheGovernmem of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/20 /2006- IR( CM - II) dated 23-10-2006 re- ferred the following dispute between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman under Section 10 ( 1 )( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudica- tion to this Tribunal. The reference is ,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action the management of M / s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services ofSri Kunsoth Shankar w.e.f. 16-12-1998 is legal andjustified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled?"
2. The case is called out several times after repeated intervals. None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present . Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although severat opportunities has been given to him . He is absent today also. No application for adjournment has been filed. As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
3.Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court is of view that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect of the matter in reference. Hence , 'NIL' Award is passed.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistanı , transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of August , 2008.
VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer Appendix ofevidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2742.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार
5447
सितम्बर 27 , 2008/आश्विन 5 , 1930
एस. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्यागिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 70/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जां केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4 9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/311 /2005 आईआर ( सीएम- ।। ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September . 2008
$.O. 2742.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 70 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- curn- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the managemem of M. s . Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd.. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 4-9-2008
[No. L-22012/311 / 2005 - IRIC M - 11 ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS TRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 18th day of August, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. L. D. 70/2006 BETWEEN
The General Secretary, (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana ) Singareni Collieries Employees Council. H.No.18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar Markandeya Colony,
...Petitioner Godavarikhani -505209,
AND
The General Manager,
M/ s. Singareni Collieries CompanyLimited. Mandamarri Division ,
Mandamarri - 504231.
..Respondent.
APPEARANCES
For the Petitioner : NIL
For the Respondent M / s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri , Advocates
AWARD
TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/ 311 / 2005 - IR ( CM - 11 ) dated 9-10-2006 re- ferred the following dispute between the management of the Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their work- man under Section 10( 1 )( d ) of the 1.D. Act . 1947 for adjudi- cation to this Tribunal. The reference is.
5748
HIGASETE ONDA SEPTEMBER 27 , 2008/ ASVINA S. 1930
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action the management of Singacat ottienes Compatty taited ostetting file servicesof Su Suppeta Odelo yiram- yastified If not, to what rehe
Becaescals out sey veal times terepoved teral Nime peace for Pentoner Res Visit veral oppogrime been gavense luto Helplay also No appear for andjournmorskarh it appear the A bis case is being losco antars Court is of the casethat the Petitioner deserves norchelin respect of the maner in reference. Here . ll . wis passed
Phaedoosri . Personal As transcrised by het . corrected and pronouned by me on 11811جسم : do Agust 2008
EDPRAKASHA R. Presale C Appendix of evidence
Witnesses and fir
Wtresses minder Petitiother
Respundunt
זוN
Dogpaments marked for the Pebtiener N
Douguomenis markted for the Respondent
NJI . 114 सम्बर 2008
का. आ. 2743 नाद्योगिक विवाद ? ( 1947 का ) का ? के अनुारण में केन्द्रीय सरग्स, सी. गो. एन. कवनं संबद्ध नियंजक के बीच अनुचन्ध में निशिविवाद में RRRછRRRR AA ?? ** , ************* *** ****** ? ? ???????? # 09210691104 リ 14. * !! 10920 *** 37134411 1 11}| New DealSeptember, 20
S.U. 274.5. In pursuance of Section at the Industrial Despites Act 1947 ( 14 01 1971, the Contral CGovernment hereby publishes the award ( Ref No.606 of the Cental Riverment Industmal Tribunal cour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispate between the management of Mis . Singaremt allteries Co. Il and their workmen , rwhich was eceived by the Central Governntent on 04-9.2008 .
(No.1-22012 309 2008 ΑJΑΥ ΚΙΜAR GAI R. Desk ficer
PAK : 11 -SM . 3 (ii ) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INUSTRIAI , TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD
Present : Shri Ved Peakash Gaur , Presiding Officer Dated the 15th day of August , 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 69/2006
BETWEEN
TheGeneral Secretary. (Sri Bandarı Satyanarayana) Singareni Collteries Employees Council , H.No. 18-3-90/3 , CGanesh Nagar Markandeya Colony
Godavarikhani 50200
.Peticioner
ANI
..Respon- The General Manager , M/ s. Singareni Colleries Company Limited, Mandamarri Division , dent .
Mandamarri 504231
APPEARANCES
.
For the Petitioner
For the Respondent M's . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and Vijaya Iasi Panguluri . Advocates
AWARD
The Governmcat of India . Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L -22 (0) 2309 2005-13 ( CM- 1 ] ) dated 9-10-2006 го ferred the following dispute between the managerment of the Singareni Collieries Company limited and their work- man under Section 10 jed ) of the 1.D. Act , 1947 for adjudi- cation to this Tribunal The reference is ,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action the management of Mis . Singareni Callieries Compan luanted in terminating the services of Sri K. Srinivas, nel 29-5-2001 is legal and justitied? Ifnot, to what relict the workman is entitled? " 2 The case is called out several times aller repeated intervals. None appeared for Petitioner . Respondent's representative present Petitioner has not submitted his claim statement although several opportunities has been given to him . He is absen today also . No application for adjournment has been tiled . As such, it appears that the Pentioner is not interested to pursue this case.
3. Accordingly. this case is being closed and this Court is of the view that the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect of the matter in reference . Hence . 'NII ' Award is passed.
Dictatedto Sunt , P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by ber , conected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of August , 2008.
VED PRAKASHIGAUR, Presiding Officer भारत का राजपत्र [ भाग ।। -खाण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Appendix of'evidence
Witnesses examined tor Petitioner
Witnesses examined for Respondent
NII .
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली , 4 सितम्बर, 2008
का. आ, 2744, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस्प् सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुग्रन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 68/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-9-2008 कां प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/314/2005 - आई. आर. ( सीएम -1[ ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th September, 2008 S.O. 2744. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 68/2006) ofthe Central Governinent Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court . Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Mis. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , and their workinen , which was received by the Central Government on 04-9-2008.
[No. 1.-22012/314/2005 - IR(CM- II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR . Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS- TRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD
Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, PresidingOfficer Dated the 18th day of August, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 68/2006
BETWEEN
The General Secretary, (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana) Singareni Collieries Employees Council , H.No , 18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar Markandeya Colony ,
...Petitioner Godavarikhani - 505209
5449
सितम्बर 27 , 2008 / आश्विन 5 , 1930
AND
TheGeneral Manager ,
M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Mandamarti Division, Mandamerri - 504231
..Respondent
APPEARANCES
: NIL
For the Petitioner
For the Respondent M/s . P.A.V.V.S. Sanna and Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri , Advocates AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L-22012/314/2005 - IR (CM-11 ) dated 9-10-2006 re- ferred the following dispute between the management of the Singareni Collicrics Company Limited and their work- man under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudi- cation to this Tribunal . The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action the management of M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Beesaboina Ramułu w.e.f. 22-1- 2002 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is emitled? "
2. The case is called out several times after repeated intervals . None appeared for Petitioner. Respondent's representative present . Petitioner has not submitted his claim staternent although several opportunities has been given to him . He is absent today also . No application for adjournment has been filed . As such , it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
3. Accordingly, this case is being closed and this Court is ofthe view Umat the Petitioner deserves no relief in respect ofthe matter in reference . Hence, 'NIL ' Award is passed.
Dictatedto Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day ofAugust, 2008.
VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for Petitioner
Witnesses examinedfor Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL .
Documents marked for the Respondent नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2008
का. आ. 2745,--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.
5450
PS3 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 / ASVINA 5. 19.311
सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियांजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के चोच अनुबंध में निदिएर औद्योगिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय मगर औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचार ( संदर्भ में 67/2006 ( को प्रकाशित करती है , जो कंन्द्रीय सरकार को 104 א को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल- 22012/317/2005 - आईआर ( मोएम ।। ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारो New Delhi , the 4th September , 2008 S.O. 2745. -in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 67-2016 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cam - 1ber Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management f M/ s. Singareni Colteries Co. Ltd. , and their workanan, which was received by the Central Govertiment on 04-9-2008 .
No. L -22012 / 317 : 2005 - IRIKM - 11 )| AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE QUE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT , HYDERABAD
PRESENT : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 18th day of August , 그다음 Industris Dispute No. 1. D. 67/2006
BETWEEN
under Section 10( 1 ) d ) of the 117 Act. 19.17 for adjudication to this Tribunal . The reference ts .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of tk. mamayem1וחי Mis . Singareni tolliertes Company Limited m terminating the series el Sei Gadadla Posham w.e.f. 31-7-2001 is legal angustiot . It not to shat relhet the workman as critled . ""
2.The case is called scraitimes after repeatest intervals . None appeared it Penoner Respondent's . representative present . l'ution has not submitted his claim statement although several opporturaties has been given to hun . He is abscy also. No application adjournment has been lifed . As such, it appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pusar this case
3. Accordingly , this case is being closed and this Court is of the view that thi . Petitioner deserves no rebelim respect of the matter in reference Hence , 'NIL' Award is passed.
Dictated to Smt Pinwri . Personal transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 18th day of Adeust. 100S.
VED PRAKASIE GAUR Presiding Officer Appendis of exudence
Witnesses examined love Petitioner
Winesses mined for Respondent
NIL
NII .
Documents marked for the Petitroner
Pentioner
The General Secretary , ( Sri Bandarı Satyanarayana) Singarem Collieries Lamployees Council , Η Νο.18-3-903 . CGanesh Nagar Markandeya Colony . Godavarikhani 5052 ( 19)
AND
Documents marked for the Respondent नई दिल् 2005
Responden!
TheGeneral Mamager , Mis. Singareni Colleries Company I armitเป Mandarmarri Division . Mandanuri 504231
APPEARANCES
दिनांक 28-8-20808 ( नर्ष की आयु का हान का, आ. 2746 . अभत्रा अगले आदेशों तक अधिकरण-सह- श्रम न्यायालय रूप में नियुक्त करते हैं। अधिकारी के