This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD . NO.D. L. ( N) 04/0007/2003 05

* भारत राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 10 ]

No. 10]

नई दिल्ली, मार्च 1 मार्च 7, 2009 , शनिवार/फाल्गुन 10- फाल्गुन 16 , 1930 NEW DELHI, MARCH 1 -MARATURDAY/PHALGUNA 10 PHALGUNA 16, 1930 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3 - उप-खण्ड (ii) PART II Section 3 Sub -section ( ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 541.-सरकारी स्थान ( अनधिकृत अधिभोगियों के बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग के 20 जनवरी , 1997 के सं. का.आ. 15 का अतिक्रमण करते हुए, ऐसे अतिक्रमण से पहले किए गए कार्यों और करने के लिए छोड़े गए कार्यों को छोड़कर केंद्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा निम्नलिखित सारणी के कालम ( 2 ) में उल्लिखित उन अधिकारियों को नियुक्त करती है जो सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारियों के स्तर के समकक्ष अधिकारी हों और उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजन के लिए संपदा अधिकारी ( एस्टेट ऑफिसर ) होंगे। ये अधिकारी उक्त अधिनियम द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे तथा उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन उक्त सारणी के कालम (3 ) में उल्लिखित सरकारी स्थानों के संबंध में संपदा अधिकारियों को सौंपे गए कार्यों कोपूरा करेंगे।

सारणी

क्रम सं. अधिकारी का पद

सरकारी स्थानों की श्रेणियां और क्षेत्राधिकार की सीमाएं 1

1. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , अहमदाबाद

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से गुजरात राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। 2. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , बंगलूर

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से कर्नाटक राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। 695 GI/2009

(1041) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

1042

3. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , भोपाल

4. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, भुवनेश्वर

5. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , चंडीगढ़

6. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , चेन्नै

7. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, गुवाहाटी

8 क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , हैदराबाद

9. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , जयपुर

10. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक, जम्मू

11. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , कानपुर

12. महाप्रबंधक ( प्रभारी अधिकारी ) , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक, कोच्चि

13. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , कोलकाता

14. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , महाप्रबंधक, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , लखनऊ

15. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , मुंबई

16. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , महाप्रबंधक, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , नागपुर

17. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , नई दिल्ली

18. उप महाप्रबंधक , ( प्रभारी अधिकारी ) , विदेशी मुद्रा विभाग , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, पणजी

19. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक, पटना

20. क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , महाप्रबंधक , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , तिरुवनंतपुरम

21. प्रधानाचार्य , कृषि बैंकिंग महाविद्यालय , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, पुणे

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान । भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से उड़ीसा राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से संघ शासित क्षेत्र चंडीगढ़ तथा पंजाब और हरियाणा राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान।

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से तमिलनाडु राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से असम राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से राजस्थान राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से जम्मूऔर कश्मीर राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान ।

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से कानपुर में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान।

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से कोच्चिमें पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान।

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान । भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य ( कानपुर को छोड़कर ) में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान।

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से महाराष्ट्र राज्य ( नागपुर तथा पुणे को छोड़कर ) में पटेटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान ।

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर सेनागपुर में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान।

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से दिल्ली/नई दिल्ली में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से गोवा राज्य में पटटे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान । भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर सेबिहार राज्य में पट्टे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से केरल राज्य (कोच्चि को छोड़कर ) में पट्टे पर लिया गया अवस्थितस्थान ।

भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पुणे में पट्टे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1043

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

22. महाप्रबंधक ( प्रभारी अधिकारी ) , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , देहरादून

23. महाप्रबंधक (प्रभारी अधिकारी ) , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , रायपुर

24. महाप्रबंधक ( प्रभारी अधिकारी ) , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, रांची

스

25. महाप्रबंधक ( प्रभारी अधिकारी ) , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक, शिमला

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से उत्तराखंड राज्य में पट्टे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य में पट्टे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से झारखंड राज्य में पट्टे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान। भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक का अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य में पट्टे पर लिया गया अवस्थित स्थान ।

[फा. र्स. 65 ( 1 )/2007-बी ओ- II ] एस. गोपाल कृष्ण, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

NewDelhi, the 23rd February, 2009

S.O. 541. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction ofUnauthorised Occupants) Act , 1971 (40 of 1971 ) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance , Department of Economic Affairs S.O. No. 15 dated 20th January 1997 except as respect things done or omitted to be done before such supersession , the Central Government hereby appoints the officers mentioned in column (2 ) of the Table below, being officers equivalent to the rank of a gazetted officer of Government , to be Estate Officers for the purpose ofthe said Act, who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on the estate officers by or under the said Act in respect of the public premises specified in column (3 ) ofthe said Table .

S.No. Designation of the Officer

1. The Regional Director, Chief General Manager , General Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Ahmedabad .

2. The Regional Director , Chief General Manager , General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Bangalore.

3. The Regional Director, Chief General Manager , General Manager , Reserve Bank ofIndia, Bhopal.

4. The Regional Director, Chief General Manager, GeneralManager , Reserve Bank of India, Bhubaneshwar .

5. The Regional Director , Chief General Manager, General Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Chandigarh

6. The Regional Director, Chief General Manager , General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai .

7. The Regional Director , Chief General Manager , General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Guwahati

8. The Regional Director, Chief General Manager , General Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Hyderabad.

9. TheRegional Director, Chief General Manager , General Manager, Rešerve Bank of India, Jaipur

TABLE

Categories of public premises and limits ofjurisdiction

Premises belonging to, or taken on lease by, or on behalf of, the Reserve Bank of India in the state ofGujarat.

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by, or on behalf of, the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Karnataka

Premises belonging to, or taken on lease by, or on behalfof, the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Madhya Pradesh

Premises belonging to, or taken on lease by, or on behalf of, the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Orissa

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by, or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the Union Territory ofChandigarh and states of Punjab and Haryana.

Premises belonging to, or taken on leaseby , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Tamil Nadu.

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Assam.

Premises belonging to, or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Andhra Pradesh .

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by, or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Rajasthan .

1044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

10. The Regional Director , Chief General Manager , General Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Jammu

11 . The Regional Director , Chief General Manager , General Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Kanpur

12. The General Manager , (Officer - in -Charge) , Reserve Bank of India, Kochi

13. The Regional Director , Chief General Manager , General Manager , Reserve Bank of India , Kolkata

14. The Regional Director , Chief General Manager, General Manager , Reserve Bank of India , Lucknow

15. The Regional Director, Chief General Manager , General Manager, Reserve Bank of India , Mumbai

16. TheRegional Director , Chief General Manager , General Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Nagpur.

17. The Regional Director , Chief General Manager, General Manager , Reserve Bank of India, NewDelhi

18. TheDeputy General Manager, ( Officer - in -Charge) , Foreign Exchange Department , Reserve Bank of India, Panaji

19. The Regional Director, Chief General Manager , General Manager , Reserve Bank of India , Patna 20. TheRegional Director , Chief General Manager , General Manager , Reserve Bank of India . Thiruvananthapuram

21. The Principal, College of Agricultural Banking, Reserve Bank of India , Pune

22. TheGeneral Manager (Officer - in-Charge) , Reserve Bank of India , Dehradun

23. The General Manager ( Officer - in -Charge ) , Reserve Bank of India , Raipur

24. The General Manager ( Officer - in-Charge) , Reserve Bank of India , Ranchi

25. The General Manager (Officer - in-Charge ) , Reserve Bank of India , Shimla .

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )]

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Jammu and Kashmir .

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in Kanpur.

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in Kochi.

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of West Bengal .

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Uttar Pradesh except in Kanpur .

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Maharashtra except in Nagpur and Pune .

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in Nagpur.

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in Delhi/New Delhi .

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Goa.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by, or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Bihar.

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by, or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Keral except in Kochi .

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in Pune .

Premises belonging to , or taken on lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the state of Uttarakhand.

Premises belonging 10 , or taken or lease by , or on behalfof the Reserve Bank of India in the State of Chhattisgarh .

Premises belonging to , or taken or lease by , or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the State ofJharkhand.

Premises belonging to , or taken or lease by, or on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India in the State of Himachal Pradesh .

[F. No. 65 / 1 /2007 -BO -II ] S. GOPAL KRISHNA, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 2 मार्च, 2009

का.आ. 542.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी (उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप - धारा 3 ( ज ) एवं ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा श्री बी. इब्राहिम को उनकी नियुक्ति संबंधी इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , विजया बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालीन गैर - सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/22/2006-बी ओ-11 डॉ. तरसेम चन्द, उप सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

1045

New Delhi , the 2nd March, 2009

S.O. 542. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section 3(h) and (3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer ofundertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause ( 1) of clause 3 ofthe Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme ; 1970/1980 , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri B: Ibrahim as part - time non- official Director on the Board of Directors of Vijaya Bank, for a period ofthree years from the date ofnotification of his appointment or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 9 /22/2006-BO- I ]

Dr. TARSEM CHAND, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 2 मार्च, 2009

का.आ. 543.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम के खण्ड 3 के उप - खण्ड ( 1 ) तथा खण्ड 8 के उप- खण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप - धारा 3 के खण्ड ( क ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के साथ परामर्श करके , एत‌द्वारा इस समय राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक श्री एस. श्रीधर ( जन्म तिथि 9-5-1951 ) को इस पद पर उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से दिनांक 31-05-2011 तक अर्थात् जिस महीने वे अपनी अधिवर्षिता की आयु पूरा करेंगे , उस महीने के अन्तिम दिन तक की अवधि तक अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , जो भी पहले हो , सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/22/2008- बी ओ -1 ]

डॉ. तरसेम चन्द, उप सचिव

New Delhi , the 2nd March, 2009

S.O. 543. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) sub -section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub -clause (1 ) of clause 3 and sub- clause (1) of clause 8 of the Nationalised Banks ( Managerment and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970/1980 , the Central Government, in consultation with the Reserve Bank ofIndia , hereby appoints Shri S. Sridhar (DoB : 09-05-1951 ) présently Chairman and Managing Director , National Housing Bank as Chairman and Managing Director, Central Bank of India for aperiod from the date of taking charge of the post, till 31-05-2011 i.e. , the last day of the month in which he would attain the age of superannuation or until further orders , whichever event occurs earlier.

F: No. 9/22/2008 -BO-I ]

Dr. TARSEM CHAND, Dy. Secy .

(राजस्व विभाग )

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली , 25 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 544.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5रा और 5ड़ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक1-4-2007 से संगठन संजीवन मेडिकल फाउंडेशन्स डा. डी. के. गोसावी मेमोरियल श्री सिद्धि विनायक गणपति कैंसर हॉस्पिटल , मीराज , महाराष्ट्र को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात:-

(1) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकर से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

69561/ 09-2 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

1046

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा (ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 19/2009/फा. सं. 203/99/2008- आ.क.नि. - 11 ]

पदम सिंह , अवर सचिव

(Department of Revenue)

(Central Board ofDirect Taxes)

New Delhi , the 25th February , 2009

S.O. 544. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Sanjeevan Medical Foundation's Dr. D. K. Gosavi Memorial Shri Siddhi Vinayak Ganapati Cancer Hospital , Miraj , Maharashtra has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income -tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 5C and SE of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 ( said Rules ) , with effect from 1-4-2007 in the category of other Institution', partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section ( 2 ) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income -tax or the Director of Income - tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report ofaudit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization : -

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 : or (b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to insub -paragraph ( iv ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and SE of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 19 /2009 /F . N. 203/99/ 2008 - ITA - II ]

PADAM SINGII , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 545.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि कंन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ड़ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ii) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2009 से संगठन वनस्थली यूनिवर्सिटी , राजस्थान को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे ' विश्वविद्यालय ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात:-

(1) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगाः

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

1047 (iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता यही रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :--

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप - पैसग्राफ (iii) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ (iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 21 /2009/फा. सं. 203/ 125/2008- आ.क.नि.- II ]

पद्म सिंह, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 25th February, 2009

S.O. 545. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Banasthali University , Rajasthan has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii) of sub - section (1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income- taxAct, 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules), with effect from 1-4-2009 in the category of 'University' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:----

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research, get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income -tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1) of Section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied forscientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .

2. The central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:- (

a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph (iii) ofparagraph 1 ; or (b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii) of paragraph 1; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d). ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe said Act read with rules 5C and 5E of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 21 /2009/F. N. 203 / 125 /2008 /ITA- II]

PADAM SINGH , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 546.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5ड़ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 1048

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 7, 2009 /PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

के खण्ड (ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2003 से संगठन नौरोजी गोदरेज सेंटर फॉर प्लांट रिसर्च, मुंबई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, अर्थात:-

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

( ii) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकर से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप -पैराग्राफ (iii) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ के उप- पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

( ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ (iv) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

( घ ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा (ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और ऽङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 20/2009/फा. सं. 203/44/2008- आ.क.नि. - 11 ]

पदम सिंह , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 25th February , 2009

S.O. 546. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Naoroji Godrej Centre for Plant Research , Mumbai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income -tax Act , 1961 ( said Act ) , read with Rules 5C and SE of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules ) . with effect from 1-4-2003 in the category of other Institution' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii ) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub - section (2 ) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income - tax or the Director of Income -tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act ;

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or (b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and SE of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 20 /2009/F . No. 203/44/2008 - ITA - II ]

PADAM SINGH , Under Secy .

1049 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/ फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

NewDelhi, the 25th February, 2009 नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2009

S.O. 547. It is hereby notified for general informa- tion that the organization Centre for Wind Energy Technology, Chennai, has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii) of sub - section (1) ofSection 35 ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961- (said Act) , read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 (said-Rules) with effect from 1-4-2005 in the category of 'other Institution ' partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :---

का.आ. 547. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ड़ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2005 से संगठन सेंटर फॉर विंड एनर्जी टेक्नोलॉजी, चेन्नई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से, अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, अर्थात्:-

The sums paidto the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक. अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(1) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty mem- bers or its enrolled students;

(m) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect ofthe sums received by it for scientific research, reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub-section (2) of Section 288 ofthe said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly singed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;

(iii). अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवतः सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा।

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत् सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा ; अथवा

fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub-paragraph ( iii ) ofparagraph 1 ; (a) or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub -paragraph (iii) ofparagraph 1; or (ख ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप - पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub -paragraph (iv) of paragraph 1; or

(ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(ग) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नही पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ड़ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii) ofsub-section (1) of Section 35 ofthe said Act, read with rules 5C and 5E of the Rules .

[Notification No. 22/2009/F . No. 203/32/2008 /ITA- II ] [अधिसूचना सं. 22/2009/फा. सं. 203/32/2008-आ.क.नि.- II ]

PADAM SINGH, Under Secy.

पदम सिंह , अवर सचिव

89561/09-3 1050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

जयपुर , 25 फरवरी , 2009

सं. 16/2008-09

का.आ. 548. आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उपधारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, जयपुर एतदद्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2007-08 एवम आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उददेश्य से " श्री बागडिया बाल विद्या निकेतन , लक्ष्मणगढ़ , जिला-सीकर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं ।

बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी) की उपधारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे । [क्रमांक:मुआआआआआ/( मु. ) जय/10 ( 23 सी ) (vi )/08-09 /4105 ]

बी.एस. ढिल्लों, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Jaipur, the 25th February, 2009

No. 16/2008-09

S.O. 548. In exercise of the powers confered by sub-clause (vi ) ofclause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA ofthe Income- tax Rules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of Income - tax, Jaipur hereby approves " Shri Bagaria Bal Vidya Niketan , Laxmangarh , Distt. - Sikar" for the purpose of said section for the A.Y. 2007-08 & onwards.

Provided that the society conforms to and complies with the provisions of sub - clause (vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962.

[No.CCTT/JPR/Addl. CIT(Hqrs .)/ 10(23C)(vi )/2008-09/4105] B. S. DHILLON, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 16 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 549,-केन्द्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है; अर्थात्:

2. राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बंगलुरू से संबंधित दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] अनुसूचि के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित डेंटल कालेजों के बारे में क्रमांक 49के XIV एवं XVI के सामने कालम 2 एवं 3 की वर्तमान प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां उसके नीचे रखी जाएंगी , अर्थात्:-

एम डी एस ( कोन. डेंनटिस्ट्री ) "(ii) दंत शल्य क्रिया निष्णात संरक्षण दंत चिकित्सा (यदि 6-5-2008 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

राजीव गांधी यूनिवर्सिटी आफ हैल्थ साइंसिज , बंगलुरू , ( आर जी यू ओ एच एस)

आर्थोडोनटिक्स

( यदि 6-5-2008 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

एम डी एस ( आर्थोडोनटिक्स ) राजीव गांधी यूनिवर्सिटी आफ हैल्थ साइंसिज , बंगलुरू , ( आर जी यू ओ एच एस ) "

एम डी एस ( कम्युनिटी डेनटिस्ट्री) .

सामुदायिक दंतचिकित्सा (यदि 06-05-2008 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

राजीव गांधी यूनिवर्सिटी आफ हैल्थ साइसिज , बंगलुरू , ( आर जी यू ओ एच एस) "

XVI कृष्ण देव राय दंत चिकित्सा विज्ञान महाविद्यालय और अस्पताल , बंगलुरू

एम डी एस ( ओरल एंड मैक्सि- लोफेशियल सर्जरी )

" दंत शल्य क्रिया निष्णात ओरल एंड मैक्सिलोफेशियल सर्जरी ( यदि6-5-2008 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

राजीव गांधी यूनिवर्सिटी आफ हैल्थ साइंसिज, बंगलुरू , ( आर जी यू ओ एच एस)

आर्थोडोनटिक्स

(यदि6-5-2008 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एम डी एस ( आर्थोडोनटिक्स ) राजीव गांधी यूनिवर्सिटी आफ हैल्थ साइंसिज , बंगलुरू , ( आर जी यू ओ एच एस)

पेरियोडोनटिक्स

( यदि 6-5-2008 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

एम डी एस ( पेरियोडोनटिक्स) राजीव गांधी यूनिवर्सिटी आफ हैल्थ साइंसिज , बंगलुरू , ( आर जी यू ओ एच एस ) "

[सं.वी. 12017/08/2004-डी ई ]

राज सिंह , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTHAND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 16th February , 2009

S.O. 549. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section(2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of1948) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby , makes the following amend- ments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :---

2. Under the existing entries of column 2 and 3 against XIV and XVI of serial No. 49 in respect of the following dental colleges in part - I of the Schedule to the [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1051

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16,1930

Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948) pertaining to Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences , Bangalore , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :-

XIV A.E.C.S. Maaruti College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore

"(ii)Master ofDental Surgery Conservative Dentistry (Ifgranted on or after 6-5-2008 ) MDS(Con. Dentistry) Rajiv Gandhi Univer- sity ofHealth Sciences, Bangalore, (RGUOHS) MDS(Orthodontics) Orthodontics (Ifgranted on or after 6-5-2008) RajivGandhi Univer- sity ofHealth Sciences, Bangalore, (RGUOHS) CommunityDentistry (Ifgranted on or after 6-5-2008 )

MDS ( Community Dentistry) Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences , Bangalore, (RGUOHS) " XVI Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bangalore "(ii) Master of Dental Surgery Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Ifgranted on or after 6-5-2008 ) MDS (Oral andMaxi- llofacial Surgery) Rajiv Gandhi Univer- sity ofHealth Sciences, Bangalore, (RGUOHS) MDS (Orthodontics) Orthodontics (Ifgranted on or after 6-5-2008) RajivGandhi Univer- sityofHealth Sciences, Bangalore, (RGUOHS) MDS ( Periodontics) Periodontics (Ifgranted on or after 6-5-2008) Rajiv Gandhi Univer- sity ofHealth Sciences, Bangalore, (RGUOHSY"

[No.V- 12017/ 08 /2004-DE] RAJ SINGH , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 550.-केन्द्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्ः 2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में राजस्थान स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय, जयपुर द्वारा प्रदान की जाने वाली डेंटल डिग्रियों को मान्यता दिए जाने के संबंध में क्रम संख्या 72 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां शामिल की जाएंगी " 4. जोधपुर डेंटल कॉलेज , सामान्य अस्पताल , ओघपुर (i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक

बीडीएस ,

(यदि यह 6-10-2007 को अथवा इसके उपरांत प्रदान की गई हो । )

राजस्थान स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर"

[संवी. 12017/53 /2002-डी ई] राज सिंह , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th February, 2009

S.O. 550.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 ofthe Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of1948) , the Central Government, after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby , makes the following amend- ments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 72, in part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Rajasthan University of Health Sciences , Jaipur , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder

"IV Jodhpur Dental College, General Hospital, Jodhpur (i)Bachelor ofDental Surgery

(When granted on or after 6-10-2007)

BDS, Rajasthan Uni- versity of Health Sciences, Jaipur. "

[No.V- 12017/53/2002-DE] RAJ SINGH , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 551.-केन्द्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है; अर्थात्ः

: 2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में पं. रविशंकर शुक्ल विश्वविद्यालय , रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के संबंध में क्रम संख्या 71 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां शामिल की जाएंगी :

" II. गवर्नमेंट डेंटल कॉलेज , रायपुर छत्तीसगढ़

बीडीएस , पं. रविशंकर (1) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक

( यदि यह 5-10-2007 को अथवाः इसके उपरांत प्रदान की गई हो । ) शुक्ल विश्वविद्यालय, रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) "

[संची 12017/43/2002 -डी ई] राज सिंह , अवर सचिव [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

New Delhi , the 18th February, 2009

1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of Dental Degrees awarded by Barkatullah University, Bhopal, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :-

"II . RKDF Dental College & Research Centre , Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh .

S.O. 551. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of1948) , the Central Government, after consultation with DentalCouncil ofIndia, hereby, makes the following amend- ments in Part - J of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

BDS, Barkatullah University, Bhopal "

(1) Bachelor of Dental Surgery (Whengranted on or after 12-3-2008)

[No. V- 12017/ 11 /2002 -DE] RAJ SINGH , Under Secy .

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 71 , in part -I ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948) pertaining to Pt . Ravishankar Sukla Uni- versity, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) , the following entries shali be inserted thereunder :-

" IL. Government Dental College , Raipur, Chhattisgarh .

(दंत शिक्षा अनुभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2009 (1) Bachelor of Dental Surgery BDS , Pt . Ravishankar (When granted on or after Sukla University, 5-10-2007) Raipur (Chhattisgarh ) "

[No. V - 12017/43/2002-DEJ RAJ SINGH , Under Secy .

का.आ. 553. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) के खंड (ङ ) के अनुसरण में डा. अनिल कुमार चांदना को भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद के सदस्य के रूप में राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र दिल्ली सरकार द्वारा नामित किया गया है ।

नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2009

अंतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के साथ पठित धारा 3 के खंड ( ङ) के अनुसरण में केंद्र सरकार स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार के दिनांक 24 जनवरी, 1984 की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 430 में एतदद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्

का.आ. 552. केन्द्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है; अर्थात्:-

उक्त अधिसूचना में शीर्षक " धारा 3 के परंतुक के साथ पठित खंड (ङ) के अधीन नामित " के नीचे क्रमांक 20 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित को उसमें रखा जाएगा अर्थात्

राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र दिल्लीसरकार 2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में बरकतुल्लाह विश्वविद्यालय , भोपाल द्वारा प्रदान की जाने वाली डेंटल डिग्रियों को मान्यता दिए जाने के संबंध में क्रम संख्या 69 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी :-

"20 डा. अनिल कुमार चांदना , जे-5/ 61 , ( दूसरा तल ) , राजौरी गार्डन, नईदिल्ली-110027

" 2. आर. के.डी.एफ.डेंटल कॉलेज एंड रिसर्च सेंटर , भोपाल , मध्य प्रदेश

बीडीएस , बरकतुल्लाह

(1) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक

[सं.वी. - 12013/1 /2001 -डी ई ] राज सिंह, अवर सचिव

(Dental Education Section) (यदि यह 12-3-2008 को अथवा इसके उपरांत प्रदान की गई हो 1 ) विश्वविद्यालय , भोपाल "

New Delhi , the 18th February , 2009 [सं.वी. - 12017/11/2002-डी ई ] राज सिंह, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2009

S.O. 553. Whereas in pursuance of clause (e ) of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , Dr. Anil Kumar Chandna has been nominated by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi to be member of the Dental Council of India.

S.O. 552. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2) of SofSection 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of1948), the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amend- ments in Part - I ofthe Schedule to the said Act, namely :---

Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( e) of Section 3 read with sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of In- dia in the Ministry ofHealth and Family Welfare , No. S.O. 430 dated 24th January , 1984 namely :-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 69 , in part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1053 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नियंत्रण ) , निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद्, द्वारा समय -समय परं लिखित में दिए गए निर्देशों से आबद्ध होगा ।

[फा. सं. 5/23/08- ईआई एण्ड ईपी In the said notification under head "Nominated under clause (e) read with proviso to Section 3 " for serial No. 20 and the entries relating thereto, the following shall be substituted therein, namely :-

किरण पुरी , निदेशक

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

(Department of Commerce)

Government 16-11-2006 " ofNational Capital Territory ofDelhi:

"20. Dr. Anil Kumar , Nominated Chandna J - 5 /61 , (2nd Floor) , Rajouri Garden New Delhi - 110027

NewDelhi, the 3rd March, 2009 [F. No. V- 12013/ 1 /2001 -DE] RAJ SINGH , Under Secy.

वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्रालय (वाणिज्य विभाग ) .

नई दिल्ली , 3 मार्च, 2009

S.O. 554. Whereas M/ s . Therapeutics Chemical Research Corporation having their operating address at Ward No. 8, Plot No. 17, Durgachowk Colony Market, Haldia , West Bengal, PIN - 721602 has applied to the CentralGovernment for recognizing them as an Inspection Agency under EIC Inspection Agency Recognition Scheme,2002.

And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the said M/s . Therapeutics Chemical Research Corpo- ration is fit to act an inspection agency for the purpose of sub-section (1 ) of Section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963);

का. आ. 554. मैसर्स थैराप्यूटिक्स केमिकल रिसर्च कार्पोरेशन जिनका प्रचालन पता,वार्ड संख्या 8 , प्लॉट संख्या 17 , दुर्गाचौक कालोनी मार्केट , हाल्दिया , वेस्ट बंगाल , पिन 721602 ने केंदीय सरकार को निनिप की निरीक्षण अभिकरण मान्यता योजना , 2002 के अधीन निरीक्षण अभिकरण की मान्यता के लिए आवेदन किया है;

और, केंदीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त मैसर्स थैराप्यूटिक्स केमिकल रिसर्च कार्पोरेशन निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के प्रयोजन के लिए निरीक्षण अभिकरण के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए उपयुक्त है;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1 ) ofSection 7 ofthe Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963 ) read with sub - rule (2) ofrule 12 ofthe Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules , 1964, the Central Government hereby recognizes the said M/s . Therapeutics Chemiesearch Corporation as an agency for a period ofthrees with effect from the dateofpublication of this notification the Official Gazette, for inspection ofMinerals and Oregroup -I ), namely, Irọn OreandManganese Ore excluding canganese Dioxide, as specified in the Schedule annexed to the notification ofthe Government of India in the erstwhile Ministry of Commerce number S.O. 3975 dated the 20th day ofDecember, 1965 , prior to the export of the said Minerals and Ores at Haldia, subject to the following conditions , namely:-

अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार , निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण) नियम 1964 के नियम 12 के उपनियम ( 2 ) के अनुसरण में और निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 (1963 का 22) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स थैराप्यूटिक्स केमिकल रिसर्च कार्पोरेशन , को इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए, भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन वाणिज्य मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 3975 तारीख 20 दिसम्बर , 1965 में उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विर्निदिष्ट खनिज और अयस्क, ( समूह -1 ) अर्थात्लौह अयस्क और मैंगनीज अयस्क, मैंगनीज डॉयआक्साइड को छोड़‌कर के निर्यात से पूर्व निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन हल्दिया में , खनिजों और अयस्कों का निरीक्षण करने के लिए एक अभिकरण के रूप में मान्यता प्रदान करती है , अर्थात्

(1) that the said M/ s . Therapeutics Chemical Research Corporation shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection Council in this behalf to examine the method of inspection followed by them in granting the certificate of inspection under rule 4ofthe Export of Minerals and Ores , Group - I (Inspection) Rules, 1965 ; and

(i) यह कि उक्त मैसर्स थैराप्यूटिक्स केमिकल रिसर्च कार्पोरेशन, खनिज और अयस्क, समूह-1 ( निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1965 के नियम 4 के अधीन निरीक्षण का प्रमाण- पत्र देने के लिए उनके द्वारा अपनाई गई पद्धति की जांच करने के लिए, इस निमित्त निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद्द्वारा नाम निर्देशित अधिकारियों को पर्याप्त सुविधाएं देगा ;

(ii) that the said Mis . Therapeutics Chemical Research Corporation in the performance of their functions under this notification shall be . bound by such directives as the Director (Inspection and Quality Control) , Export Inspection Council may give in writing from time to time.

(ii) यह कि उक्त मैसर्स थैराप्यूटिक्स केमिकल रिसर्च कार्पोरेशन, इस अधिसूचना के अधीन अपने कृत्यों के अनुपालन में निदेशक ( निरीक्षण और क्वालिटी

[F. No. 5/23/08 -ΕΙ & ΕΡ] KIRAN PURI , Director 695 G1/ 09-4 1054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ] उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 555.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स आर. के. इलैक्ट्रॉनिक्स , इन्दु बँगला के सामने , मणिभाई, सावरकुण्डला -364515 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " आरके-टी 213 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " आरटैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 / 469 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टस , और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

seed

Artech Brand Class III

R.K.Electronics

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

तोलन उपकरण के इंडिकेटर पर दिए गए दो बिन्दुओं पर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के पास सीलिंग की जाती है । सील तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध की एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 कि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10*, 2× 10 * या 5 × 10* , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 158 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1055 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 555. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, issatisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with digital indication of "RK -T 213 " series ofmedium accuracy (accuracy class - III) and with brand name " ARTECH" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . R.K. Electronics , Opp . Indu Bunglow, Manibhai Chowk, Savarkundala-364515, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/ 469;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Artech Brand

(MAXTOR MIN 1

III

Class

R.K.Electronics

Figure 2. Sealing diagram of the model.

Sealing is done near the stamping plate for which two points are given on the body of the weighing instrument . The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal. A typical schematic diagram ofsealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2g. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 158 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1056

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009/PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 556. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स आर. के. इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स , इन्दु बँगला के सामने , मणिभाई , सावरकुण्डला-364515 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " आरके. पी 411 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " आरटैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/470 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट्स, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Artech

Brand Class III R.K.Electronics

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

तोलन उपकरण के इंडिकेटर पर दिए गए दो बिन्दुओं पर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के पास सीलिंग की जाती है । सील तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10* या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 158 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1057 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7 , 2009/फाल्गुन 16 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 556. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards ofWeights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument ( Plateform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) ofSeries " RK- P411 " and with brand name " ARTECH " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . R.K. Electronics , Opp . Indu Bunglow, Manibhai Chowk, Savarkundala- 364515 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/08/470;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Artech

Brand ClassIII

R.K.Electronics0

Fig. 2 sealing provision of the indication ofmodel 7.

Sealing is done near the stamping plate for which two points are given on the body of the indicator ofthe weighing instrument. The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5× 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (158 )/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 695 GI/09-5 1058

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 557. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अंकुर इंटरप्राइजिज , " कुणाल " आई हास्पिटल रोड , नियर बाला हनुमानजी , सावरकुण्डला-364515 गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " AE - 030 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " DGSON " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडलं कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 08/ 173 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट्स, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

MAX : 30 kg MIN100

DOSOW

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

तोलन उपकरण को सीलबंद करने के लिए इसके बाईं तथा दायीं तरफ तल तथा शीर्ष पर छेद किए जाते हैं तथा इन छेदों के जरिये एक सील तार लगाई जाती है और जिस पर सीसा सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्तदिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 39 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1059 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 557. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " AE- 030" series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "DGSON" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Ankur Enterprises, " Kunal " Eye's Hospital Road, Nr. Bala Hanumanji , Savarkundala-364515 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/173;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5 g. It has a tare device with a100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

MAX 30 kg MIN 100 g 5 g Class!!!

DGSON

Figure-2: Sealing diagram ofthe model .

For sealing the holes are drilled at the bottom and the top cover of the weighing instrument from the left and right side and a seal wire is passed through these holes upon which a lead seal is applied. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e' value of 100 mg. to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2× 10k or 5 × 10k, wherek is a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (39)/2008 ]

R.MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 1060

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 558. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अंतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पावर बिल्ड लिमिटेड , पी.ओ. बॉक्स # 28 , आनन्द सोजित्रा रोड, विठल उद्योगनगर -388121 , वल्लभ विद्यानगर , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग I वाले " माइक्रोसॉफ्ट मेट इंटीग्रेटर " श्रृंखला के निरंतर गणना करने वाला स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( बेल्ट व्हीयर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " माइक्रोसॉफ्ट मेट इंटीग्रेटर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/504 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित निरंतर गणना करने वाला ( बेल्ट व्हीयर) बेल्ट कन्वेयर , वेइंग सिस्टम और इलेक्ट्रोनिक कंट्रोल पैनल सहित स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता Qmax 1600 टन/घंटा और न्यूनतम क्षमता Qax 320 टन/घंटा है और मापमान अंतराल ( डी ) 0.01 टन और स्पीड 3m/s है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट्स , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

सीलिंग गुंथित धातु के तार और लीड सील से की जाती है जिसे संस्थापन के स्थान पर किया जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 153 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1061 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

New Delhi , the30th December , 2008

S.O. 558. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accüracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Continuous Totalizing Automatic Weighing Instrument (Belt Weigher) belonging to accuracy class - 1 of 'Micro Mate Integrator ' series with brand name "Micro Mate Integrator" (herein referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/s . Power Build Limited, P.O. Box # 28, Anand-Sojitra Road, Vithal Udyognagar -388121 , Vallabh Vidyanagar , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/504;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Continuous Totalizing Automatic Weighing Instrument (Belt Weigher) along with belt conveyor , weighing system and electronic control panel . Its maximum capacity Q is 1600 tonne / hour and minimum capacity Q is 320 tonne/hour and scale interval (d) is 0.01 tonne and speed is 3m/s . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2SealingDiagram

For sealing is done with twisted metal wire and lead seal which is to be done at the place of installation . A schematic diagram of sealing provision is given above.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 153)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 695 61/ 09-6 1062

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 559.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पावर बिल्ड लिमिटेड , पी.ओ. बॉक्स # 28 , आनन्द सोजित्रा रोड, विठल उद्योग नगर-388121 , वल्लभ विद्यानगर , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग -0.5 वाले " मोडवे " श्रृंखला के निरंतर गणना करने वाला स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( बेल्ट व्हीयर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मोडवे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 08 /581 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित निरंतर गणना करने वाला ( बेल्ट व्हीयर ) बेल्ट कन्वेयर , वेइंग सिस्टम और इलेक्ट्रोनिक कंट्रोल पैनल सहित स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता Q 1600 टन/घंटा और न्यूनतम क्षमता Q320 टन/घंटा है और मापमान अंतराल ( डी) 0.01 टन और स्पीड 3m/s है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट्स , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

def

bbe 2

EMC

ModWeigh MW99 FLOWRATE INDICATO

REMOTE ALARM

VOLUME

5 mne 6

FLOW SELECT

SPEED DEMAND

RESET TOTAL

BATCH WEIGHT

PRINT TOTAL

DISPLAY

ZERO

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 153 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक भाप विज्ञान

1 1063 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 559.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Continuous Totalizing Automatic Weighing Instrument (Belt Weigher) belonging to accuracy class- 10.5 of "Modweigh" series with brand name "Modweigh" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Power Build Limited, P.O. Box # 28 , Anand- Sojitra Road, Vithal Udyognagar -388121 , Vallabh Vidyanagar , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 08 / 581 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Continuous Totalizing Automatic Weighing Instrument (Belt Weigher) along with belt conveyor , weighing system and electronic control panel . Its maximum capacity Q is 1600 tonne/ hour and minimum capacity Q is 320 tonne/hour and scale interval (d) is 0.01 tonne and speed is 3m/ s . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

MadWreigh MWD FLOWRATE INDICATOR

ALARM

VOLUME REMOTE

FLOW SELECT

SPEED DEMAND

PRINT TOTAL

RESET TOTAL

BATCH WEIGHT

DISPLAY

PRINT ZERO

Figure-2Sealing Diagram

The sealing is done with twisted metal wire and lead seal which is to be done at the place of installation . A schematic diagram of sealing provision is given above.

[F. No. WM-21 (153 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 1064

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii ) ]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली , 19 फरवरी , 2009

का. आ. 560. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं: --

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

क्रम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

संशोधन लागू होने कीतिथि

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

03 , नवम्बर , 2007

13-02-2009

आई एस 7098( भाग 1 ) : 1988 की संशोधन संख्या 3

इन भारतीय संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ : ईटी 09/टी-43 ]

प्रकाश बचानी , वैज्ञानिक-ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी वि. )

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 19th February, 2009

S.O. 560. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :-

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. No. and Year of the Indian Standards

No. and Year of the Amendments

Date from which the Amendments shall have effect

(1)

(2)

(4)

1. IS 7098 (Part 1 ) : 1988 Specification

13-02-2009

03, November, 2007

for Crosslinked Polyethylene

Insulated PVC Sheathed Cables

Part 1 For working voltages up to

and including 1100 V (First Revision)

Copy of these Amendments are available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: ET 09 /T -43 ]

PRAKASH BACHANI , Sc . E & Head (Electrotechnical Department )

नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2009

का. आ. 561.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

1065 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित. भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हों, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

अक्तूबर , 2008

कुछ नहीं

आई एस 15807 भाग 1: 2008 लिग्नाइट के पेट्रोग्राफिक विश्लेषण की पद्धतियाँ भाग 1 लिग्नाइट के पेट्रोग्राफिक विश्लेषण से संबंधित पारिभाषिक शब्दों की परिभाषा

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: पीसीडी/जी-7 ( गजट ) ]

डा. ( श्रीमती ) विजय मलिक, निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( पी सी डी)

New Delhi , the 20th February, 2009

S.O. 561.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:---

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl . No. No and Year and title ofthe Indian Standards Established

No and Year of Indian Standards , if any Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

None

October,2008

1. IS 15807 (Part 1) : 2008 Methods of PetrographicAnalysis of Lignite Part 1 Definition of terms Relating to Petrographic Analysis ofLignite

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices :Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: PCD/G- 7 (Gazette)]

DR. (SMT) VIJAY MALIK, Director & Head (PCD)

नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 562. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानकों में संशोधन किये गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या

और वर्ष

क्रम. संख्या

01मार्च, 2009

2, दिसम्बर , 2008

आई एस 12592: 2002

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूरं , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सीईडी/राजपत्र ]

ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी ) 695 G1/09-7 1066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

NewDelhi , the20th February, 2009

S.O. 562. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

Sl . No. No. and year of the Indian Standards

(1)

(2)

1. IS 12592 :2002

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(3)

(4)

1March 2009

2, December, 2008

Copy of these amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: CED/Gazette] A.K. SAINI , Sc.'F ' & Head ( Civil Engg .)

( जयपुर शाखा कार्यालय )

नई दिल्ली , 23 फरवरी , 2009

का. आ. 563. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के नियम ( 4 ) के उप नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेन्सों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिये गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्रम सं. लाइसेंस सं.

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

चालूतिथि

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 1

8976618

27-10-2008 मैसर्स राजधानी डिस्ट्रीब्यूटर्स , प्लॉट नं. 4, नारायण पुरी खातीपुरा , जयपुर- 302006 ( राजस्थान)

8977923

31-10-2008

8978723

07-11-2008

8979018

11-11-2008

ए- बी रोड,

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक व संबंधित भारतीय मानक

(5)

374:1979 इलेक्ट्रिक सीलिंग फैन्स एण्ड रैग्यूलेटर्स

7098 ( भाग 1 ) : 1988

एक्सएलपीई इन्सुलेटेड पीवीसी

केबल्स

मैसर्स अपार पॉवर केबल्स (प्रा. ) लि. एफ-540, रोड नं. 1 , डी, वि.औ. क्षेत्र , जयपुर-302013 ( राजस्थान)

13947 ( भाग 3 ) : 1993

मैसर्स मिलबोर्न स्विच गियर्स ( प्रा. ) लि. 36-सी, सुदर्शनपुरा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , जयपुर- 302006 ( राजस्थान)

लो वोल्टेज स्विचगियर एण्ड कन्ट्रोलगियर

मैसर्स गोला स्टील एण्ड कास्टिंग प्रा.लि.

1729:2002

कास्ट आयरन/डक्टाईल आयरन ड्रेनेज पाइप्स एण्ड पाइप फटिंग्स

गाँव-आदलपुर , जिला- धौलपुर ( राजस्थान)

8979119

11-11-2008

8979220

11-11-2008

14543 :2004

पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वॉटर

मैसर्स ममता इण्डस्ट्रीज , एच-424 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र खुशखेडा, भिवाडी, जिला- अलवर (राजस्थान)

14543:2004

पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वॉटर

मैसर्स श्री बेवरेजेस , ई -9 औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , परबतपुरा माखुपुरा विस्तार , अजमेर-305002 ( राजस्थान ) [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1067

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

(3)

(4) (2)

(1)

11-11-2008

8979321

मैसर्स गोला स्टील एण्ड कास्टिंग प्रा.लि. ए-बी रोड, गाँव- आदलपुर, जिला- धोलपुर, (राजस्थान)

11-11-2008

8979422

मैसर्स कोचर एग्रो इण्डस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. ए-22 , एम.आई. ए. , अलवर-301030 (राजस्थान) 9

8980710

12-11-2008 मैसर्स डी. एस. इण्डस्ट्रीज एफ -424(ए) , मरूधर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र फेज- II , बासनी , जोधपुर ( राजस्थान)

8981611

17-11-2008

मैसर्स कैपिटल स्टील्स एण्ड कैमीकल्स ( प्रा. ) लिमिटेड प्लॉट नं. 148 , बैनाडा मोड़ , गॉव शान्तिपुर, पी.ओ. मानसरखेडी बस्सी, जिला- जयपुर- 303301 (राजस्थान)

17-11-2008

8982411

मैसर्स श्री राठी स्टील ( दक्षिण ) प्रा.लि. एसपी-ए-1 , रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , खुशखेडा, भिवाडी जिला-अलवर (राजस्थान)

18-11-2008

8981712

मैसर्स शिव दत्त राय लिखमी चन्द ज्वैलर्स गढ़ चौराहे के पास , मेन मार्केट चूरू- 331001 ( राजस्थान) 13

8981813

18-11-2008 मैसर्स संजय बैराठी जैम्स लिमिटेड 401, एमराल्ड टॉवर, के.जी.बी.का रास्ता , जौहरी बाजार , जयपुर (राजस्थान)

19-11-2008

14 8982007

मैसर्स पीएसजे ज्वैलर्स प्रा.लि. प्लॉट नं. 19 , शिवराज निकेतन , गौतम मार्ग , वैशाली सर्किल , वैशाली नगर, जयपुर-302021 (राजस्थान)

20-11-2008

15 8982108

मैसर्स पालीवाल सन्स डेयरी प्रा.लि. प्लॉट नं. एफ-475-76, जी 463-64, ग्रोथ सैन्टर एक्सटेंशन , रीको, धौलपुर-328001 (राजस्थान) (5)

3989: 1984 सैन्ट्रिफ्‌यूगल कास्ट (स्पन ) आयरन स्पाइगोट एण्ड सॉकेट 3975:1999 माइल्ड स्टील वायर्स , फोर्ड वायर्स एण्ड टेप्स फॉर आरमरिंग आफ केबल्स

14927:( भाग 2): 2001 केबल ट्रकिंग एण्ड डक्टाईल सिस्टम्सफॉर इलैक्ट्रिकल इन्स्टालेशन

2645:2003 इन्टीग्रल सीमेन्ट वॉटरप्रूफिंग कम्पाउण्ड

1786:1985 एचएसडी स्टील बार्स एण्ड वायर्स फॉर कंक्रीट रिइनफोर्समेंट

1417:1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हॉलमार्किंग

13334(भाग 1 ) : 1998 स्किम्ड मिल्क पाउडर - स्टैण्डर्ड ग्रेड 1068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009/PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

(5)

8982209

21-11-2008

398 ( भाग 2 ) : 1996 एसीएसआर

मैसर्स सनराईज केबल्स एण्ड कण्डक्टर्स बी-1 , मनुविहार रोड नं. 9 एफ -2 लेन के पीछे वि.औ. क्षेत्र , जयपुर-302013 राजस्थान

8972509

19-11-2008 मैसर्स श्री श्याम एण्टरप्राईजेज ए-405 बी-1 , रोड नं. 9एफ वि.औ.क्षेत्र , जयपुर-302013 (राजस्थान)

15500 ( भाग 7) :2004 डीपवैल हैण्ड पम्पस , कम्पोनेन्ट्स एण्ड स्पेशल टूल्स- रबर कम्पोनेन्ट्स

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13: 11 ] पी.के. गम्भीर , उपमहानिदेशक ( मुहर )

(Jaipur Branch Office)

New Delhi, the 23rd February, 2009

S.O. 563. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Certification Regulation , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedules .

SCHEDULE

Name and Address of the Licensee

Operative Date

Sl. No.

Licence No. (CM/L-)

Article/Process Covered by the licences and the relevant IS:Designation

November 2008

1 8976618

27-10-2008

374:1979 Electric Celling Type Fans & Regulators

M/ s Rajdhani Distributors Plot No.4, Narayan Puri Khatipura Jaipur- 302006 Rajasthan

8977923

31-10-2008

7098( Part 1) : 1988 XLPE Insulated PVC Cables

M/ sAppar Power Cables (Pvt. ) Ltd. F-540 , Road No. - ID, V.K.I. Area Jaipur- 302013 Rajasthan

3 8978723

07-11-2008

13947 (Part 3) : 1993 Low Voltage Switchgear and Controlgear

M/sMillborn Switch Gears (P) Ltd. 36 - C, Sudarshanpura Industrial Area Jaipur- 302006 Rajasthan

8979018

11-11-2008

1729:2002 Cast Iron/Ductile Iron Drainage Pipes& Pipe Fittings

M/ sGola Steel and Casting Pvt . Ltd. A-B Road Village: Adalpur Distt . Dholpur Rajasthan

5 8979119

11-11-2008

14543: Packaged Drinking Water

M/s Mamta Industries H-424 , Industrial Area Khushkhera , Bhiwadi Distt. Alwar-301019 Rajasthan 1069

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7 , 2009/फाल्गुन16 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

3 1

11-11-2008 8979220

11-11-2008 8979321

11-11-2008 8 8979422

12-11-2008 9 8980710

8981611

17-11-2008 10

17-11-2008 11

8982411

8981712

18-11-2008 12

18-11-2008 8981813

19-11-2008 14 8982007

20-11-2008 15 8982108

695 61/ 09-8

14543: Packaged Drinking Water

M/ sShree Beverages E 9, Industrial Area , Parbatpura , Makhupura Extension, Ajmer-305002 Rajasthan

3989:1984

Centrifugally Cast (Spun) Iron Spigot and Socket

M/sGola Steel and Casting Pvt . Ltd. A-B Road Village:Adalpur Distt. Dholpur (Rajasthan)

3975:1999

Mild Steel Wires , Formed Wires and Tapes for Armouring of Cables

M/sKochar Agro Industries Pvt . Ltd Α-22 Μ.Ι.Α. Alwar- 301030 (Rajasthan)

14927 (Part2) :2001 Cable Tunking and Ductile Systems for Electrical Installation

M/ sD.S. Industries Phase- II, Basni Jodhpur- 342 003 (Rajasthan) F-424(A) , Marodhar Industrial Area

2645:2003

Integral Çement

Waterproofing Compound

M/ sCapital Steels & Chemicals (P) Ltd. Plot No. 148 , BenaraMord Village: Shantipur P.O. Mansarkhedi Bassi , Distt . Jaipur - 303 301 Rajasthan

1786: 1985

HSD Steel Bars & Wires for Concrete Reinforcement

M/ sShri Rathi Steel (Dakshin) Pvt Ltd. SP-A- 1 , RIICO IndustrialArea Khushkhera, Bhiwadi Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan)

1417: 1999 Hallmarking ofGold Jewellery

M/sShiv Dutt Rai Likhami Chand Jewellers Near Garh Choraha, Main Market Churu - 331001 (Rajasthan)

1417: 1999 Hallmarking ofGold Jewellery

M/sSanjay Bairathi Gems Limited 401 , Emerald Tower K.G.B. Ka Rasta, Johri Bazar Jaipur (Rajasthan)

1417: 1999 Hallmarking ofGold Jewellery

M/sPSJ Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. P.No. 19 , Shivraj Niketan, Gautam Marg, Vaishali Circle VaishaliNagar Jaipur - 302 021 (Rajasthan)

13334 (Part 1): 1998 Skimmed Milk Powder- Standard Grade

M/s Paliwal Sons Dairy Private Ltd. PlotNo. F-475-76,G-463-64 GrowthCentre Extension, RIICO Dholpur - 328001 Rajasthan 1070

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

4 J

8982209

21-11-2008

[PART II-- SEC.3 (ii)]

M/sSunrise Cables & Conductors

1 ,Manu Vihar Behind Road No. 9F-2 Lane V.K.I. Area , Jaipur - 302013 Rajasthan

19-11-2008

8972509

M/sShree Shyam Enterprises A-405 B - 1 , Road No. 9F V.K.I. Area Jaipur-302013 Rajasthan 398 (Part 2) : 1996

ACSR

15500 (Part 7) :2004 Deepwell Hand Pumps , Components and Special Tools - Rubber Components.

[No.CMD/ 13: 111 P.K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2009

का. आ. 564.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के विनियम 5 के उप विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , को लाइसेंस प्रदान किए गए हैं :

अनुसूची

वैधता तिथि

लाइसेंस सं.

क्रम सं.

उत्पाद

आईएस

पार्टी का नाम एवं पता ( कारखाना )

03-10-2008

7860388

मिलेनियम बेवरेजेज 1.

सर्वे क्र. 39/1 बी विलेज हेडवली (दोलखंब ) , शहापुर जिला ठाणे -421601

26-09-2008 सिलवासा बेवरेजेज 2.

7875203

गाला क्र. 1/ए, सर्वे क्र. 2/2/2 गुजरात पावर स्टेशन के सामने मधुबन डैम रोड , कराड़ दादरा और नगर हवेली-396240

24-09-2008

7880394

जोसेफ लेसलाई ड्रेगर

मॅन्यू. प्रा.लि. वोरा इण्ड. इस्टेट सागर माथन इण्ड. इस्टेट के नजदीक घोकीवारा , भोईपाडा गाँव , सातीवली रोड वसई ( पूर्व ) जिला थाणे-401208

23-10-2008

7879716

संजीवनी फूड एण्ड बेवरेजज शेड सं. 726 ( क्र.सं. 240पी) पेलहर गाँव , वसई ( पूर्व ) जिला ठाणे -401208

सं. /भाग/खण्ड/ वर्ष

भामा 14543 :2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

श्वसन संरक्षी उपकरण भामा 14166: 1994

भामा 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

[सं. के.प्र.वि/ 13 : 11 ]

पी.के. गंभीर, उप- महानिदेशक 1071

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन16, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi, the 23rd February, 2009

S.O. 564. In pursuance of sub - regulation (6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars ofwhich are given below in the following Schedule :

SCHEDULE

Licence No.

Sl. No.

Licence grant date

Name and Address (factory) ofthe Party 1. 7860388 03-10-2008 Mellennium Beverages SurveyNo.39/1 /B VillageHedvali (Dolkhamb) , Shahpur Dist Thane -421601 7875203

26-09-2008 Silvassa Beverages GalaNo. 1 /A, SurveyNo. 2/2/2 Opp.Gujarat Power Station Madhubhan Dam Road , Karad Dadra &Nagar Haveli - 396240 7880394

24-09-2008 Joseph Leslie Drager Mfg. Pvt. Ltd. , Vora Indl. Estate Near Sagar Manthan Indl . Estate, Ghokiwara VillageBhoidapada Sativali Road, Vasai (E) Dist Thane-401 208 7879716

23-10-2008 Sanjeevani Food & Beverages ShedNo. 726 (Sr No.240P) Village Pelhar, Vasai DistThane-401 208 Product

IS No./Part/Sec./ Year

14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

141543:2004 PackagedDrinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14166:1994 Respiratory Protective Devices: Full face masks

14543:2004 PackagedDrinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

[No.CMD/13: 11 ] P.K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2009

का. आ. 565. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 5 के उप- विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं को लाइसेंस प्रदान किए गए हैं ;

अनुसूची उत्पाद

पार्टी का नाम एवं पता ( कारखानां)

वैधता तिथि

लाइसेंस सं.

क्रम सं.

25-11-2008

7866505

आई एस सं./भाग/खण्ड/ वर्ष

भामा 14543 :2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

सागर इन्टरप्राईजेज

सी-45 , एसटीआईसीई,

एमआईडीसी, मुसलगाँव , सिन्नर

नासिक-422112

7875506 25-11-2008 सुमीत फ्लोरीन प्रा.लि. प्लॉट सं. 130 , श्रीनाथ इण्डस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट सव्ररोली गाँव , तलसारी , जिला-थाणे-401606

भामा 14543 :2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) 1072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

(1) (2)

(4)

(3)

04-11-2008

7883808

आदित्य इण्डस्ट्रीज प्लॉट सं. 81 , रोड सं. 1 और 7 सेक्टर 1 /एस , एचडीएफसी बैंक के पीछे , नया पनवेल जिला- रायगढ-410206 4.

7885812

11-11-2008 रप्ताकोस ब्रेट एण्ड कं. लि. 1 पोखरण रोड , माजीवाडा शास्त्री नगर ठाणे ( प. ) 400606

7887715 19-11-2008 अमेया इन्टरप्राईजेज कृष्णां भवन , कसेली पोस्ट: कलहेर 7887816 07-11-2008

साई गणेश एग्रो प्लॉट सं. 108 , शिवाजी नगर एमआयडीसी, सतपुर नासिक-422007

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] (5)

(6)

भामा 14543 :2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

भामा 15757 :2007 अनुसरित फार्मूला अनुपूरक आहार

भामा 14543 :2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

भामा 3906 :1995 फसल संरक्षा उपकरण - हस्त प्रचालित पीठ पर लादा जाने वाला फुहारा , पिस्टन किस्म

[सं. के.प्र.वि./ 13 : 11 ] पी.के. गंभीर , उप-महानिदेशक

NewDelhi , the 23rd February, 2009

S.O. 565. In pursuance of sub -regulation ( 6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE Sl No.

Licence No.

Licence grant date

Name and Address (factory) of the Party

25-11-2008

1. 7866505

SagarEnterprises C-45 , Stice, MIDC At: Musalgaon, Sinnar Nashik -422112 2. 7875506 25-11-2008 Summit Flourine Pvt . Ltd. Plot No. 130 , Shreenath Indl . Estate,

Village Savroli , Talasari , DistThane-401606 3. 7883808 04-11-2008 Aaditya Industries Plot No. 81 , Road No. 1 & 7 , Sector 1 / S Behind HDFC Batık New Panvel DistRaigad-410206 4. 7885812

11-11-2008 Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. Ist Pokhran Road, Majiwada, Shastri Nagar Thane (W) -400 606 Product

IS No./Partr/Sec Year

14543:2004 PackagedDrinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14543:2004 (Other than Packaged Packaged Drinking Water Natural Mineral Water)

14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

15757:2007 Follow -up Formula- Complementary Foods 1073

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

7887715

Ameya Enterprises 19-11-2008

Krushna Bhuvan , At: Kasheli , PostKalher

07-11-2008

7887816

Sai Ganesh Agro Tech Pvt . Ltd. PlotNo. 108, Shivaji Nagar, Near MIDC Satpur, Nashik-422007

14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

3906: 1995

Crop Protection Equipment -Hand Operated Knapsack Sprayer, Piston Type

[No.CMD/ 13:11] P.K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General

नई दिल्ली , 23 फरवरी , 2009

का. आ. 566. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 5 के उप विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं को लाइसेंस प्रदान किए गए हैं :

अनुसूची उत्पाद

पार्टी का नाम एवं पता (कारखाना)

वैधता तिथि

लाइसेंस सं.

क्रम सं.

फ्रेश अक्या मल्टीलिंक

02-12-2008

7868711

ए/7-111 , प्रितेश कामप्लैक्स, पोस्ट: वाल

भिवंडी, जिला थाणे

05-12-2008

7883505

अवलांची फूड एण्ड बेवरेजेज प्रा.लि. 11/13 पुराना कापरीहेन्श बिल्डिंग , कमानी, एल.बी.एस. मार्ग ,

कुर्ला (प. ) , मुबंई-400070

आइ एस सं./भाग/खण्ड वर्ष

भामा 14543 :2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

भामा 14543 :2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

[सं. के. प्र.वि./13: 11 ]

पी.के. गंभीर , उपमहानिदेशक

New Delhi, the 23rd February, 2009

S.O. 566- In pursuance of sub -regulation (6 ) 'of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Name and Address

Licence

(factory) ofthe Party No.

No.

grant date

2-12-2008

7868711

Fresh Aqua Multilink A/7-111 , Pritesh Complex, AtPost: Val. Bhiwandi , Dist Thane

5-12-2008

7883505

Avalanche Food & Beverages PvtLtd 11/13 Old Caprihence Building, Kamani, L.B.S. Marg, Kurla (W). Mumbai -400070 695 61/09-9

Product

IS No./Part/Sec . Year

14543:2004 PackagedDrinkingWater (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

[No.CMD/13: 11 ] P.K. GAMBHIR,Dy, Director General 1074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली , 23 फरवरी , 2009

का. आ. 567. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम (4 ) के उप नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेन्सों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिये गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्रम सं.

चालूतिथि लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

लाइसेंस सं. दिसम्बर 2008

01 .

8984718

28-11-2008 मैसर्स बिरधी चन्द घनश्याम दास , 9 , लक्ष्मी कॉम्पलैक्स , एम. आई. रोड, जयपुर-302001 राजस्थान 02. 8984819

01-12-2008 मैसर्स नॉर्थ इण्डिया प्लास्टर , ए-307 , आई.जी.सी. खारा , बीकानेर, राजस्थान 03 . 8985922

05-12-2008 मैसर्स एस के खेतान पाईप इण्डस्ट्रीज , आराजी नं. 845/782 , गांव तिजवाड , डूंगरपुर, राजस्थान 04.

8987522

10-12-2008 मैसर्स अपार पॉवर केबल्स (प्रा. ) लि. , एफ-540 , रोड नं. 1डी, वि.औ. क्षेत्र, जयपुर-302013 राजस्थान 05.

8989021

16-12-2008 मैसर्स जैन ज्योति ज्वैलर्स प्रा. लि. , मुखीजा मैन्शन , महावीर पार्क के पास, भीलवाड़ा-311001 राजस्थान 06. 8988322

17-12-2008 मैसर्स आर. एम. इण्डस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट नं. जी 1-695 , रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, भिवाडी-301019 , जिला-अलवर , राजस्थान 07. 8983716

19-11-2008 मैसर्स एन आर सन्स ज्वैलर्स एण्ड कं. प्रा. लि. , 942/4, मिश्रा टकसाली मैन्शन , द्वितीय तल , चौड़ा रास्ता, 'जयपुर , राजस्थान 08. 8984314

28-11-2008 मैसर्स ओरियन्ट केबल्स ( इण्डिया ) प्रा. लि. , ए-784 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , फेज-2 , भिवाडी-301019 , जिला-अलवर, राजस्थान 09.

8989122

18-12-2008 मैसर्स अग्रवाल उद्योग , एफ-47 , बीचवाल औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , बीकानेर-334002, राजस्थान भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक व संबंधित भारतीय मानक

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हॉलमार्किंग

2547 ( भाग 1 ): 1976 जिप्सम बिल्डिंग प्लास्टर

458: 2003 प्री-कास्ट काँक्रीट पाइप्स ( विद एण्डविदाउट रीइन्फोर्समेंट )

1554 ( भाग 1 ) : 1988 पीवीसी इन्सुलेटेड ( एचडी) केबल्स

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हॉलमार्किंग

14543: 2004 पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वॉटर

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हॉलमार्किंग

7098 ( भाग 1) : 1988

क्रॉस लिंक्ड पोलीथिलीन इन्सुलेटेड पीवीसी शीथेड केबल्स 2547 ( भाग 1 ) : 1976 जिप्सम बिल्डिंग प्लास्टर 1075

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

18-12-2008

8989223

10.

मैसर्स अंगिरा सीमेण्ट वर्क्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , एन.एच. नं. 89 , अथियासन अजमेर रोड, नागौर-341001 (राजस्थान)

18-12-2008

8989324

11.

वि. औ-क्षेत्र, मैसर्स श्री नाथ केबल एण्ड कण्डक्टर्स , सी-953 , रोड नं. 14 , जयपुर-302013 (राजस्थान)

22-12-2008

8991109

12.

मैसर्स राजधानी डिस्ट्रीब्यूटर्स,. प्लॉट नं. 4 , नारायण पुरी , खातीपुरा, जयपुर-302006 ( राजस्थान)

22-12-2008

8991008

13.

मैसर्स राजस्थान ट्रांसमीशन वायर्स प्रा. लि. , ए-190, रोड नं. 1 -डी, वि. औ. क्षेत्र, जयपुर-302013 (राजस्थान) (5)

8112: 1989 43 ग्रेड ओपीसी

7098 (भाग 1) : 1988 क्रॉस लिंक्ड पोलीथिलीन इन्सुलेटेड पीवीसी शीथेड केबल्स 996: 1979 सिंगल फेज स्मॉल एसी एण्ड यूनिविर्सल इलैक्ट्रिक मोटर

7098 (भोग 1): 1988 क्रॉस लिंक्ड पोलिथिलीन इन्सुलेटेड पीवीसी शीथेड केबल्स

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13: 113 पी.के. गम्भीर , उपमहानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2009

S.O. 567. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification Regulation, 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars ofwhich are given in the following schedules .

SCHEDULE

Name and Address of the Licensee

Sl.

Operative Date

No.

LicenceNo. (CM/L-) December 2008

28-11-2008

8984718

M/s. Birdhi Chand Ghanshyam Das , 9, Lakshmi Complex, M.I. Road , Jaipur-302001 Rajasthan

01-12-2008

8984819

Article/Process Covered by the licences and the relevant IS: Designation

1417:1999 Hallmarking ofGold Jewellery

2547 (Part 1 ): 1976 Gypsum Building Plaster

M/s. North India Plaster ,

A-307, I.G.C. Khara,

Bikaner,

Rajasthan

05-12-2008

8985922

M/s . SK Khetan Pipe Industries , Aaraji No. 845/782, Village Tijwad, Dungarpur , Rajasthan 458: 2003 Precast Concrete Pipes (With &Without Reinforcement) 1076

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 7, 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

3 4.

8987522

10-12-2008 5.

8989021

16-12-2008 6. 8988322

17-12-2008 7.

8983716

19-11-2008 8. 8984314

28-11-2008 9.

8989122

18-12-2008 10.

8989223

18-12-2008 11.

8989324

18-12-2008 12. 8991109

22-12-2008 13. 8991008

22-12-2008

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 4

1554(Part 1): 1988 PVC Insulated (HD) Cables

M/s. Appar Power Cables (Pvt. ) Ltd. , F-540 , Road No. 1 -D, V.K.I. Area, Jaipur -302 013 Rajasthan

1417: 1999 Hallmarking ofGold Jewellary

M/ s . Jain Jyoti Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Mukhija Mansion, NearMahaveer Park Bhilwara -311001 Rajasthan

14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water

M/ s. R. M. Industries , PlotNo. G1-695, RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi -301 019 Distt. Alwar, Rajasthan

1417: 1999 Hallmarking ofGold Jewellery

M/ s . NR Sons Jewellers &Co. Pvt . Ltd., 942/4, Mishra Taksali Mansion , 2nd Floor, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur, Rajasthan

7098 ( Part 1): 1988 Crosslinked Polyethylene Insulated PVC Sheathed Cables

M/ s. Orient Cables ( India) Pvt . Ltd. , A- 784 , Industrial Area, Phase II , Bhiwadi -301 019 Distt. Alwar Rajasthan

2547 (Part 1 ) : 1976 Gypsum Building Plaster

M/ s . Aggarwal Udyog , F -47 , Bichwal Industrial Area, Bikaner-334002 Rajasthan

8112 : 1989 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement

M/ s. Angira Cement Works ( P) Ltd. , N.H. No.89 , Athiyasan Ajmer Road, Nagaur-341 001 Rajasthan

7098(Part 1) : 1988 Crosslinked Polyethylene Insulated PVC Sheathed Cables

M/ s. Shri Nath Cable & Conductors , C-953 , Road No. 14, V.K.I. Area, Jaipur- 302103 Rajasthan 996:1979 Single phase Small ac and Universal Electric Motors

M/ s . Rajdhani Distributors , Plot No.4 , Narayan Puri , Khatipura, Jaipur-302006 Rajasthan 7098 ( Part 1) : 1988 Crosslinked Polyethylene Insulated PVC Sheathed Cables

M/ s . Rajasthan Transmission Wires Private Limited, A- 190 , Road No.1 -D, Vishwa Karma Industrial Area , Jaipur- 302013 Rajasthan

[No. CMD/ 13: 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks) 1077

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

लखनऊ शाखा कार्यालय

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ 568.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम , 1988 के विनियम ( 5 ) के उपविनियम (6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गयी तारीख से रद्द/स्थगित कर दिया गया है: (माह 1 जुलाई से 31 अक्तूबर )

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम वः पता

रद्द/स्थगित करने की तिथि

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल-

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

21-2-2008

9579916

मे. वुड फैब्स, ए-12 एण्ड डी-6 , सेक्टर 13 गिडा, जिला-गोरखपुर-273 209

21-2-2008

9580089

मे. वुड फैब्स, ए-12 एण्ड डी-6 , सेक्टर 13 गिडा, जिला-गोरखपुर-273 209

27-5-2008

9598112

मे. वुड़ फैब्स, ए-12 एण्ड डी-6, सेक्टर 13 गिडा, जिला-गोरखपुर-273 209

27-5-2008

9598213

मे. वुड फैब्स, ए-12 एण्ड डी-6, सेक्टर 13 गिडा, जिला-गोरखपुर-273 209

30-7-2008

9613987

मे. आर्चिड प्लाई इण्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड , प्लाट नं. 7 , सेक्टर -9 , सिडकल , पन्त नगर , रुद्रपुर, जिला-ऊधमसिंह नगर

15-8-2008

1107326

मे. डिजिन्फैक्टये केमिकल इण्डस्ट्रीज प्रा. लिमिटेड ,नीलांचल प्लेस , 569/135 - का, बरगवा , बारा बिरवा, कानपुर रोड, जिला-लखनऊ

30-4-2008

9015058

मे. किटप्लाई इण्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड , साहाबाद रोड , पीओ. रामपुर, जिला-रामपुर-244 901

31-5-2008

9176587

मे. इण्डिया पेस्टीसाइड्स लि. , प्लाट नं. ई -18 से 23 , यूपीएसआईडीसी इण्ड. एरिया , चिनहट , देवा रोड, जिला-लखनऊ

31-5-2008

9284388

में. इण्डिया पेस्टीसाइड्स लि. , प्लाट नं. ई-18 से 23 , यूपीएसआईडीसी इण्ड. एरिया , चिनहट , देवा रोड, जिला-लखनऊ

15-1-2008

9313975

10.

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

(5)

IS 4990: 1993 प्लाईवुड फार कंक्रीट सटरिंग वर्क

IS 2202:Part 1: 1999 वुडेन फलश डोर शटर्स ( सालिड कोर टाइप ) भाग -1: प्लाईवुड फेस पैनेल्स

IS 303: 1989 प्लाईवुड फार जनरल पर्पजेज

IS 1659: 2004 ब्लाक बोईस

IS 12823: 1990 प्री-लेमिनेटेड पार्टिकल बोईस

IS 1061: 2991, डिस्इन्फेक्टेन्टफ्लूड्स, फेनोलिक टाइप

IS 3087: 1985 वुड पार्टिकल बोर्ड्स (मीडियम डेन्सिटी ) फार जनरल पर्पजेज IS 632: 1978 गामा-बीएचसी ( लिन्डेन ) इमल्सिफिऐबल कन्सेन्ट्रेट्स

IS 11010: 1984 जिरम कोलोएडाल ससपेन्सन

IS 14833: 2000 लिन्डेन वेलेबल पावर

मे. कनोरिया केमिकल एण्ड इण्डस्ट्रीज

लिमिटेड, पीओ-रेनूकूट

जिला-सोनभद्र-231 217

695. G1/09-10 1078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 11.

9382691 15-6-2008

मै. इण्डिया पेस्टीसाइड्सलि. प्लाट नं. ई-18 से 23 , यूपीएसआईडीसी इण्ड. एरिया , चिनहट, देवा रोड , जिला , लखनऊ

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)]

(5)

IS 5277: 1978 डिक्लोरवस इमल्सिफिएबल कन्संट्रेट्स

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 13 ] पी. के. गम्भीर, उपमहानिदेशक( मुहर )

Lucknow Branch Office

New Delhi, the 23rd February,2009

S.O. 568.-In pursuance of sub -regulation(6) ofthe regulation 5 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification ) Regulation , 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licence particulars of which given below have been cancelled/ expired with effect from the date indicated against each (Period from 01-07-2008 to 31-10-2008 ).

SCHEDULE

Name& Address of the Licence

Sl . No.

LicenceNo. Cm/L

Date of Cancelled/ expired

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1.

9579916 21-02-2008

M/s. Wood Fabs A-12 & D-6 , Sector 13 Gida, Distt: Gorakhpur-273209 2.

9580089 21-02-2008

M/ s . Wood Fabs A-12& D - 6, Sector 13 Gida, Distt:Gorakhpur-273209 3.

9598112 27-05-2008

M/s . Wood Fabs A- 12& D -6, Sector 13 Gida, Distt:Gorakhpur-273209 4.

9598213 27-05-2008

M/ s. Wood Fabs A-12 & D- 6 , Sector 13 Gida, Distt:Gorakhpur-273209 5.

9613987 30-07-2008

M/s.Archidply Industries Limited PlotNo. 7, Sector 9, Sidcul, Pantnagar, Rudrapur Distt: Udham Singh Nagar 6.

1107326 15-08-2008

M/ s. Disinfecto Chemical Industries Pvt. Ltd , Neelanchal Place, 569/ 135 - Ka, Bargawa, Bara Birwa, Kanpur Road, Distt : Luucknow

9015058 30-04-2008

Article/Process With Relevent Indian Standards Covered bythe Licence

(5)

IS 4990: 1993 Plywood for concrete shuttering work

IS 2202: Part 1 : 1999 Wooden Flush Door Shutters (Solid Core Type) Part1: Plywood Face Paels

IS303 : 1989 Plywood for General Purposes

IS 1659 : 2004 Block Boards

IS 12823 : 1990 Pre - laminated Particle Boards

IS 1061 : 2991 Disinfectant fluids, phenolic type

M/s. Kitply Industries Ltd.

Shahbad Road, P.O. Rampur,

Distt:Rampur-244901

9176587 31-05-2008

M/s. India Pesticides Ltd. Plot No. E- 18 to 23 , UPSIDC Indl . Area , Chinhat, Deva Road, Distt: Lucknow- 227105 9.

9284388 31-05-2008

M/ s. India Pesticides Ltd. Plot No. E- 18 to 23 , UPSIDC Indl . Area, Chinhat, Deva Road , IS3087: 1985 Wood particle boards (medium density) for general purposes

IS 632 : 1978 Gama- bhc ( lindane ) emulsifiable concentrates

IS 11010 : 1984 Ziram colloidal suspension 1079

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

(5)

Distt: Lucknow-227105

15-01-2008

9313975

10.

IS 14833 : 2000 Lindane wettable power

M/s . Kanoria Chemicals & Industries

Ltd. P.O.-Renukoot,

Distt: Sonbhadra-231217

15-06-2008

9382691

11.

M/ s. India Pesticides Ltd. Plot No. E- 18 to 23 , UPSIDC Indl. Area , Chinbat. Deva Road, Distt: Lucknow -227105

IS 5277: 1978 Dichlorvos emulsifiable concentrates

[No. CMD/13: 13] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ 569.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम, 1988 के विनियम ( 5 ) के उपविनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गयी तारीख से लाइसेंस प्रदान किया गया है : - (माह 1 जुलाई से 31 अक्टूबर )

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम 'व पता

लाइसेंस प्रदान करने की तिथि

लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल-

क्रम संख्या

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

1-7-2008

1. 9673197

मै. बृजकिशोर सराफ एण्ड सन्स प्रा. लि. , अक्वाबबजाजा , चौक , जिला-फैजाबाद-- 224001 9674405 10-7-2008

मै. जेएम एग्रो प्रोडक्ट्स प्रा. लि. , डी-1/17 , सेक्टर-13 , गिडा, सहजनवा, जिला-गोरखपुर

15-7-2008

9675306

मै. मोहनश्याम कल्याणदास ज्वैलर्स बी-339 , गोल मार्केट महानगर , जिला-लखनऊ

16-7-2008

9675407

मै. गलवलिया इस्पात उद्योग लिमिटेड नरायण नगर इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया, बाजपुर रोड, काशीपुर , जिला, ऊधमसिंह नगर

22-7-2008

9676005

मै. हाकिन्स कुकर लिमिटेड प्लाट नं. ए-1 , ए-2, ए-14 एवं ए-15 यूपीएसआईडीसी , सथारिया इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , सथारिया जिला-जौनपुर-222202

31-7-2008

9677209

मै. ग्रीनप्लाई इण्डस्टीज लि. , प्लाट नं. 2 , सेक्टर 9 , आईआईई , सिडकल , पन्तनगर, रूद्रपुर, जिला, ऊधमसिंह नगर

11-8-2008

9678514

मै. लक्ष्मी डोर्स, विपेज सेमरा , चिनहट, फैजाबाद रोड, जिला, लखनऊ

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

(5)

IS 1417 : 1999 गोल्ड एण्ड गोल्ड एलाएज, ज्वैलरी एलाएज/आर्टिफैक्ट्स- फाइनेन्स एण्ड मार्किंग

IS 14543: 2004 पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर (अदर देन पैकेज्ड नेजुरल मिनरल वाटर)

IS 2830 : 1992 कार्बन स्टील कास्ट बाइलेट इनगाट्स , बाइलेट्स, ब्लूम्स , एण्ड स्लेब्स फार रि- रोलिंग इनटु स्टील फार जनरल स्ट्रक्चर पर्पजेज

IS 2347: 2006 डोमेस्टिक प्रेशर कुकर IS 1328 : 1996 वीनियर डेकोरेटिव प्लाइवुड

IS4990 : 1993 प्लाईवुड फार कंक्रीट सटरिंग वर्क 1080

(1)

(2)

(3) 8.

9678615 11-8-2008 9.

9679314 13-8-2008 10.

9679415 13-8-2008 11 .

9680602 21-8-2008 12.

9681297 25-8-2008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] (4)

(5)

मे. केशव मिल्क प्रोडक्ट प्रा. लि. , शाहबाद रोड आंवला , जिला बरेली

IS 13334 पार्ट 2 : 1992 स्किम्ड मिल्क पावडर - भाग 2 एक्स्ट्राग्रेड

IS 1659 : 2004 ब्लाक बोर्ड्स

मे. ग्रीनप्लाई इण्डस्ट्रीज लि. , प्लाट नं. 2 , सेक्टर 9 , आइ'आई ई , सिडकल , पन्तनगर, रूद्रपुर , जिला, ऊधमसिंह नगर

IS 4990 : 1993 प्लाईवुड फार कंक्रीट सटरिंग वर्क

मे. ग्रीनप्लाई इण्डस्ट्रीज लि. , प्लाट नं. 2 , सेक्टर 9 , आईआई ई , सिडकल , पन्तनगर , रूद्रपुर , जिला , ऊधमसिंह नगर

IS 13334 पार्ट 1 : 1998 स्किम्ड मिल्क पावडर - भाग । स्टैण्डर्ड ग्रेड

मे. सी पी मिल्क एण्ड फूड प्रोडक्ट प्रा. लि. , विलेज - गुडम्बा स्पोर्ट कालेज के पास , कुर्सी रोड, जिला लखनऊ

मे. पन्ना ज्वैलर्स, सिविल लाइन आर्य समाज

मन्दिर, जिला बिजनौर

13.

9681301 25-8-2008

IS 1417 : 1999 गोल्ड एण्ड गोल्ड एलाएज , ज्वैलरी एलाएज/आर्टिफैक्ट्स- फाइननेस एण्ड मार्किंग

मे. पन्नाज्वैलर्स, सिविल लाइन आर्य समाज

मन्दिरजिला बिजनौर

14.

9681402 25-8-2008 15.

9681907 29-8-2008 9682097

16.

29-8-2008 17

9682101 29-8-2008 18.

9683810 10-9-2008 19.

9683911 10-9-2008 20.

9684004 10-9-2008 21.

9685612 18-9-2008

IS 2112 : 2003 सिल्वर एण्ड सिल्वर एलाएज , ज्वैलरी/आर्टिफैक्ट्स-फाइननेस एण्डमार्किंग

मे. बहादुर ज्वैलर्स , ए-5 , प्रथम तल , प्रताप मार्केट , फैजाबाद रोड , लखनऊ

IS 1417 : 1999 गोल्ड एण्ड गोल्ड एलाएज, ज्वैलरी एलाएज/आर्टिफैक्ट्स- फाइननेस एण्ड मार्किंग

मे. नवनीता बेवरेजेज , चक नं. 720 , विलेज- अखारी , पोस्ट- बचट्छाव, परगना कसावर राजा , जिला वाराणसी

IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर ( अदर देन पैकेज्ड नेचुरल मिनरल वाटर)

IS 2062 : 2006 स्टील फार जनरल स्ट्रक्चरल पर्पजेज

मे. एस के गलवनाइजिंग वर्कस प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं. बी-2 फेस 1 सिडकल इण्ड. पार्क, सितारगंज जिला, ऊधमसिंह नगर

IS 11995 : 1987 आइसोप्रोटूरान , डब्ल्यू पी

मे. भारत आर्गेनिक्स, ए-2/3 , युपीएसआईडीसी इण्ड. एरिया सन्डीला , जिला हरदोई

मे. गोमती बेवरेजेज , 5 पुराना आरटीओ कम्पाउण्ड लाटूस रोड , लखनऊ

IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेज्ड डिंकिग वाटर (अदर देन पैकेज्ड नेचुरल मिनरल वाटर )

मे. गुप्ता पावर इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लि. , प्लाट नं. 132 , 132ए, 132बी नन्द नगर इण्ड. इस्टेट, फेस एलआई , महुआ खेरा गंज , काशीपुर, जिला-ऊधमसिंह नगर

IS 398 : पार्ट 2 : 1996 एल्यूमीनियम कल्डक्टर्स फार ओवरहेड ट्रान्समिशन पर्पजेज : भाग 2 एल्युमीनियम कन्डक्टर्स , गैल्वनाइज्ड स्टील रेनफोर्ड

मे. गुप्ता पावर इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लि. , प्लाट नं. 132 , 132ए, 132बी, नन्द नगर इण्ड. इस्टेट , फेस एलआई , महुआ खेरा गंज, काशीपुर, जिला-ऊधमसिंह नगर

IS 398 पार्ट 4 1994 अल्यूमीनियम कल्डक्टर्स फार ओवरहेड ट्रान्समिशन पर्पजेज: भाग 4 एल्युमीनियम एलाय स्ट्रेन्डेड कन्डक्टर्स , एल्युमीनियम मैगनीसियम सिलिकान टाइप

IS 710 : 1976 मैरिन प्लाईवुड

मे. रामा पैनल प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं. 8 , सेक्टर 9 , आईआईई , पन्त नगर , जिला ऊधमसिंह नगर 1081

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च7, 2009/फाल्गुन16,1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2).

(1)

18-9-2008

9685713

22.

मे. रामा पैनल प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं. 8 , सेक्टर 9 , आईआईई, पन्त नगर , जिला ऊधमसिंह नगर

18-9-2008

9685814

23.

मे. रामा पैनल प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं. 8 , सेक्टर 9 , आईआईई, पन्त नगर , जिला ऊधमसिंह नगर

18-9-2008

9685915

24.

मे. रामा पैनल.प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं. 7 , सेक्टर 9 , सिडकल , पन्त नगर , रुद्रपुर, जिला ऊधमसिंह नगर

30-9-2008

9688012

25.

मे. आर्चिडप्लाई इण्डस्टीज लि. , प्लाट नं. 7 , सेक्टर 9 , आईआईई, सिडकल , पन्त नगर, रुद्रपुर , जिला ऊधमसिंह नगर

30-9-2008

9688214

26.

मे. राम प्लाईवुड इण्डस्टीज , नैपालपुर , लखीमपुर रोड, जिला सीतापुर-261001

30-9-2008

9688315

27.

मे. राम प्लाईवुड इण्डस्टीज , नैपालपुर , लखीमपुर रोड, जिला सीतापुर-261001

-30-9-2008

9688416

28.

(5)

IS 303 : 1989 प्लाईवुड फार जनरल पर्पजेज

IS 1659 : 2004 ब्लाक बोईस

IS 4990 : 1993 प्लाईवुड फार कंक्रीट सटरिंग वर्क

IS2046: 1995 डेकोरेटिव थर्मोसेटिंग सिन्थेटिक रेजिन बान्डेड लेमिनेटेड शीट्स

IS 1659 : 2004 ब्लाक बोर्ड्स

IS 303 : 1989 प्लाईवुड फार जनरल पर्पजेज

मे. राम प्लाईवुड इण्डस्टीज, नैपालपुर,

लखीमपुर रोड, जिला सीतापुर-261001

1-10-2008

9688113

29.

मे. ग्लोबल स्मेलटर्स लि. , प्लाट नं. 1 , यूपीएसआईडीसी इण्ड. एरिया , जिला उन्नाव

6-10-2008

9689115

30..

मे. नारायण दास सर्राफ एण्ड सन्स , सीके 21/39ए, ठठेरी बाजार , जिला-वाराणसी

6-10-2008

9693106

31.

मे. केमिकल एण्ड इनसेक्टिसाइड्स , राम नगर करनजहा , पीओ-भैसहा, 14-15 किमी. देवरिया रोड, जिला-गोरखपुर

10-10-2008

9690504

32.

IS 2202: पार्ट 1 : 1999 बुडेन फलश डोर शर्ट्स ( सालिड कोर टाइप ) भाग 1: प्लाईवुड फैस पैनेल्स

A IS 2062 : 2006 स्टील फार जनरल स्ट्रक्चरल पर्पजैज

2 IS 1417: 1999 गोल्ड एण्डगोल्ड एलाएज , ज्वैलरी एलाएज/ आर्टिफैक्ट्स फाइननेस एण्डमार्किंग

IS 8446: 1991 पेस्टीसाइड कार्बन्डाजिम (एमबीसी) डब्ल्यूपी

IS 9020: 2002 पावर थ्रेसर्स- सेफटी. रिक्वायरमेन्ट्स

मे. गोविन्दप्रोडक्ट्स प्रा. लि. , विलेज-जरहारा

जैदपुर रोड, जिला- बाराबंकी-225001

15-10-2008

9690605

33.

मे. सिंहानिया मिल्स प्रोडक्ट्स प्रा. लि. , श्रामनगर, हरदोई रोड, जिला-सीतापुर-261001

20-10-2008

9691405

34.

मे. केशव मिल्क प्रोडक्ट प्रा. लि. , शाहबाद रोड , आंवला, जिला- बरेली

20-10-2008

9691506

35.

मे. जालानकान कास्ट लि. , नकहा नं. 2 एफसीआई के पास , वाया फर्टिलाइजर फैक्ट्री , जिला-गोरखपुर

20-10-2008

9691708

36.

मे. वीआरएस फूड लि. , सी 5 एवं सी 6 सन्डीला इण्ड, एरिया, जिला हरदोई-241127

69561/ 09-11

IS 33334 : पार्ट 1 : 1998 स्किम्ड मिल्क पाउडर- भाग 1 स्टैण्डर्ड ग्रेड

IS 1165 2002 मिल्क पाउडर

IS 2830 : 1992 कार्बन स्टील कास्ट बाइलेंट इनगाट्स , बाइलेट्स ब्लूम्स, एण्डस्लेब्सफार रि- रोलिंग इनटु स्टील फार जनरल स्ट्रक्चर पर्पजेज

IS 13334 : पार्ट 1 : 1998 स्किम्ड मिल्क पावडर भाग 1 स्टैण्डर्ड ग्रेड

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 13 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर , उपमहानिदेशक (मुहर ) 1082

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 7, 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

NewDelhi , the23rd February, 2009

S. O. 569. In pursuance of sub- regulation(6) ofthe regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation 1988, ofthe. Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licence particulars ofwhich given below have beengranted with effect from the date indicated against each (Period from 1-7-2008 to 31-10-2008)

SCHEDULE

Name and Address Of The Licence

ST No

LicenceNo. CM/L

GrantOf Licence Date

4 1

9673197 01-07-2008

M/ sBrijkishore Saraf & Sons Pvt.Ltd. Aqwab Bajaja, Chowk, Distt: Faizabad- 224001 2

9674405 10-07-2008 M/sJM AGRO PRODUCTS (P) LTD D-1/17 Sec- 13 , GIDA, Sahjanawa, Distt:Gorakhpur-445697 3

9675306 15-07-2008 M/sMohan Shyam Kalyan Das Jewellers B-339 , Gole Market Mahanagar , Distt: Lucknow -226006 4

9675407 16-07-2008 M/S GALW ALIA ISPA TUDYOG LIMITED NarainNagar Indi . Area. Bajpur Road, Kashipur Distt: Udham Singh Nagar -244713

9676005 22-07-2008 M/ SHAWKINS COOKERS LIMITED Plot Nos .Al , A2, A14 & A15 , U.P.S.I.D.C . Sathariya Industrial Area, Satharia Distt : Jaunpur-222202 6

9677209 31-07-2008

M/ sGREENPLY INDUSTRIES LTD. PlotNo. 2, Sector -9 , IIE, Sidcul, Pant Nagar. Rudrapur Distt : Udham Singh Nagar

9678514 11-08-2008 M/ s Laxmi Doors Village- Semra, Chinhat. Faizabad Road. Distt: Lucknow -227105 8

9678615 11-08-2008

Article/ Process With Relevent Indian Standards Covered By The Licence

Fineness IS: 1417 : 1999Gold and Gold Alloys, Jewellery/Artefacts andMarking

IS 14543: 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

IS: 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

IS 2830 : 1992 Carbon steel cast billetingots , billets, blooms and slabs for re - rolling into steel for general structural purposes

IS 2347 : 2006 Domestic Pressure Cookers

IS 1328 : 1996 Veneered Decorative Plywood

IS4990 : 1993 Plywood for concrete shuttering work

M/ sKeshav Milk Product Pvt.Ltd.

Shahbad Road Aonla, Distt: Bareilly

9679314 13-08-2008 M/sGREENPLY INDUSTRIES LTD . PlotNo.2, Sector-9 , IIE , Sidcul, Pant Nagar, Rudrapur Distt : Udham Singh Nagar

9679415 13-08-2008 M/ sGREENPLY INDUSTRIES LTD. PlotNo.2, Sector -9 , IIE, Sidcul , Pant Nagar , Rudrapur Distt: Udham Singh Nagar

11.

9680602 21-08-2008 M/s C.P. Milk And Food Products Pvt Ltd Vill-Gudamba Near Sports College Kursi Road, Distt : Lucknow- 226006

12.

9681297 25-08-2008

IS 13334: Part 2 : 1992 Skim Milk Powder- Specification - Part2: Extra Grade

IS 1659 : 2004 Block Boards

IS4990 :1993 Plywood for concrete shuttering work

IS13334: Part 1 : 1998 Skimmed MilkPowder- Specification - Part 1: Standard Grade

M/s Panna Jewellers

Civil Line Arya Samaj Mandir, Distt: Bijinor

13.

9681301 25-08-2008 M/sPanna Jewellers CivilLine Arya Samaj Mandir , Distt:Bijinor Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- IS: 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Fineness and Marking

IS 2112 : 2003 Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking/ Specification 1083

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

25-08-2008

9681402

14.

M/sBhadawar Jewellers A-5, Frist Floor, Pratap Market, Faizabad Road, Distt : Lücknow

29-08-2008

9681907

15.

M/ sNAVNEETA BEVERAGES Chack No- 720, Village-Akhari, Post-Bachcchhaw Paragana Kasawar raja, Distt : Varanasi

29-08-2008

9682097

16.

M/ sS.K.Galvanising Works (P) Ltd. Plot No. B -2 , Phase 1 , Sidcul Industrial Park, Sitarganj , Distt: Udham Singh Nagar- 262405

29-08-2008

9682101

17.

IS: 1417: 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

IS14543 :2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

IS 2062: 2006 Steel for General Structural Purposes

IS 11995: 1987 Isoproturon, WP

M/ sBharat Organics

A-2/3 ,Upside Industrial Area Sandila,

Distt:Hardoi

10-09-2008

9683810

18.

M/ sGomti Beverages India (P) Ltd. 5 Old Rto Compound Latouche Road. , Distt:Lucknow - 226018

10-09-2008

9683911

19.

M/sGupta Power Infrastructure Limited PloptNo. 132, 132a & 132b Nand Nagar Industrial Estate , Phase Ii,Mahua Khera Ganj . Kashipur Distt:Udham Singh Nagar -244713

10-09-2008

9684004

20.

M/sGupta Power Infrastructure Limited PloptNo.132.132a & 132b Nand Nagar Industrial Estate , Phase II , Mahua Khera Ganj , Kashipur Distt: Udham Singh Nagar-244713

18-09-2008

9685612

21..

M/sRAMA PANELS PRIVATE LIMITED PlotNo-8 . Sector - 9 . IIE Pant nagar, Distt- U.S.Nagar-263015

18-09-2008

9685713

22.

M/sRAMA PANELS PRIVATE LIMITED PlotNo -8, Sector - 9 , IIE Pant nagar , Distt-U.S.Nagar-263015

18-09-2008

9685814

23.

M/ s RAMA PANELS PRIVATE LIMITED PlotNo-8, Sector -9 , IIE Pant nagar Distt-U.S.Nagar-263015

18-09-2008

9685915

24.

M/s RAM A PANELS PRIVATE LIMITED PlotNo-8 . Sector -9 , IIE Pant nagar , Distt- U . S. Nagar -263015

30-09-2008

9688012

25.

M/sArchidply Industries Limited Plot No.7 , Sector 9 , Sidcul, Pantnagar. Rudrapur Distt : Udham Singh nagar

30-09-2008

9688214

26.

IS14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than PackagedNatural Mineral Water) IS 398: Part 2: 1996 Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part 2 Aluminium conductors , galvanized steel reinforced

IS398: Part 4: 1994 Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes : Part 4 Aluminium alloy stranded conductors (aluminium magnesium silicon type)

IS 710: 1976 Marine Plywood IS:303: 1989 Plywood for General Purposes

IS 1659 : 2004 Block Boards

IS 4990 : 1993 Plywood for concrete shuttering work

IS 2046: 1995 Decorative Thermosetting Synthetic Resin Bonded Laminated Sheets

IS 1659 :2004 Block Boards

M/s RAM PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES

Naipalpur, Lakhinpur Road,

Distt: Sitapur-261001

30-09-2008

9688315

27.

IS:303: 1989 Plywood for General Purposes

M/sRAM PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES

Naipalpur , Lakhinpur Road,

Distt:Sitapur-261001

30-09-2008

9688416

28.

IS 2202 : Part 1 : 1999 Wooden Flush Door Shutters (Solid Core Type ) Part 1 : Plywood Fate Paels

M/sRAMPLYWOOD INDUSTRIES

Naipalpur, Lakhinpur Road,

Distt:Sitapur-261001

01-10-2008

9688113

29.

M/sGLOBAL SMELTERS LIMITED PLOT NO - 1 , UPSIDC INDUSTRIAL AREA, Distt : Unnao , Uttar Pradesh,

IS 2062: 2006 Steel for General Structural Purposes 1084

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009 / PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

30.

9689115 06-10-2008 M/ s . Narayan Das Saraff & Sons CK 21/39 A, Thatheri Bazar , Distt:Varanasi -221001

IS: 1417: 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking 31.

9693106 06-10-2008 M/ s . Chemicals & Insecticides Ram Nagar Karanjaha, P.O. -Bhainsaha, (14-15 Kms. Deoria Road), Distt: Gorakhpur

IS 8446: 1991 Pesticide - Carbendazim (MBC ) WP- Specification

32.

9690504 10-10-2008

IS 9020 : 2002Power Threshers - Safety Requirements

M/s. Gobind Products Pvt . Limited Vill-Jarhara JaidpurRoad, Distt: Bara Banki -225001

33.

9690605 15-10-2008 M/ s . Singhania Milk Products (P) Ltd. RamNagar , Hardoi Road, Distt: Sitapur-261001

IS13334: Part 1 : 1998 Skimmed Milk Powder-Specification- Part 1 : Standard Grade 34.

9691405 20-10-2008 M/ s . Keshav Milk Product Pvt . Ltd. Shahbad Road Aonla, Distt :Bareilly

IS 1165: 2002 Milk Powder- Specification

35. 9691506 20-10-2008 M/ s . Jalan Con . Cast Ltd. Nakaha No. 2 Near FCI Via Fertilizer Factory, Distt:Gorakhpur-273007

IS 2830 : 1992 Carbon steel cast billet ingots , billets , blooms and slabs for re - rolling into steel for general structural purposes 36. 9691708 20-10-2008 M/ s. Vrs . Foods Limited C-5 & C- 6, Sandila Industrial Area . Distt:Hardoi -241127

IS 13334: Part 1 : 1998 Skimmed MilkPowder- Specification - Part 1 : Standard Grade

[No. CMD/ 13 : 13 ]

P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Directors General (Marks)

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2009

का. आ. 570.-भारत सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2442 तारीख 21 अगस्त, 2008 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा यूनियन टैरीटोरी ऑफ पुडुचेरी में वयगाई इंडस्ट्रीज टेप ऑफ से मुरूदेश्वर सिरामिक्स लिमिटेड तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 11-11-2008 से 17-11-2008 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ; और निर्धारित अवधि में जनता से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नहीं हुए ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और भारत सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्य किया है ;

अतः , अब , भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और, भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , निर्देश देती है कि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार , इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को , भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , पाइपलाइनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार , इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 1085 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16 , 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

आर. ओ . यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल ( हैक्टेयर में)

सर्वे नं.

गाँव

तहसील

जिला

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

0.01.0 जी. पी

226-1

16. सोराकूडी

तिरूनल्लार

कारैकल

0.01.0 जी. पी

226-2

0.02.0 जी. पी

224

0.06.5

225-1

0.01.0 जी. पी

225-4

0.03.0

225-5

0,14,5

कुल

0.02.5

151-2

तिरूनल्लार

4. देवमापुरम

कारैकल

0.01.0 जी. पी

152-1

0.15.0

152- 3सी

0.01.0 जी. पी

172-1

0.43.0

172-2

0.12.5

173-3

0.06.0

173-4

0.06.0

173-5

0.01.0 जी. पी

173-10

0.14.0

200-1

0.10.0

200-2

0.01.0 जी. पी

200-3

0.08.0

201-1-

0.03.0

201-2

0.09.0

201-3

0.06.0

201-4

0.03.5 जी. पी

201-5

0.00.5 जी. पी

202-1

0.02.0 जी. पी

202-5

1,45.0

कुल

[फा. सं. एल-14014/ 16/08 जी. पी. ]

के. के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

NewDelhi , the 25th February, 2009

S.O. 570. Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2442, dated 21st August, 2008 issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight ofUsers in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of natural gas by GAIL (India) Limited from Tap offpoint at Vaigai Industries in the existing line to Murudeshwar Ceramics Ltd. in the Union Territory of Puducherry; 695 GI/ 09-12 1086

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009/PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public from 11-11-2008 to 17-11-2008;

And whereas no objections were received from the public to the laying of the pipeline within the stipulated period;

And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted its report to Government of India ;

And whereas Government of India, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipelines , has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government ofIndia, vest , on this date of the publication of the declaration , in GAIL ( India) Limited , free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

District

Tehsil

Survey No.

Village

Area to be acquired for ROU ( in Hectares) Karikal

Thirunallar

16. Sorakudi

226-1

0.01.0G.P

226-2

0.01.0 G.P

224

0.02.0G.P

225-1

0.06.5

225-4

0.01.0G.P

225-5

TOTAL

0.14.5

Karikal

Thirunallar

151-2

0.02.5

4.Devamapura

152-1

0.01.0G.P

152-3C

0.15.0

172-1

0.01.0G.P

172-2

0.43.0

173-3

0.12.5

173-4

0.06.0

173-5

0.06.0

173-10

0.01.0G.P

200-1

0.14.0

200-2

0.10.0

200-3

0.01.0G.P

201-1

0.08.0

201-2

0.03.0

201-3

0.09.0

201-4

0.06.0

201-5

0.03.5 G.P

202-1

0.00.5 G.P

202-5

0.02.0G.P

TOTAL

1.45.0

[F. No. L- 14014/16/08-G.P. ]

K. K. SHARMA, Under Secy .

1087 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16 , 1930

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 571. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2704 तारीख 24 सितम्बर , 2008 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 27 सितम्बर, 2008 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार संस्थापन से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक कच्चे पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए वाडीनार- बीना पाइपलाईन परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत ओमान रिफाईनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 23 नवम्बर, 2008 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाईन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाईन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत ओमान रिफाईनरीज लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: मध्य प्रदेशं

जिला : शाजापुर

तहसील : मो. बडोदिया

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

सर्वे नं.

ग्राम का नाम

क्र. सं.

0.05

162

सागड़ियां

[फा. सं. आर-31015 /23/2008- ओ आर- II ]

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 5th March, 2009

S.O. 571. Whereas by the notification of the Government of Inida in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2704 dated the 24th September, 2008 issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ofthe Pertoleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) ( herinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 27th September, 2008 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of Users in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation ofCrude Oil through Vadinar -Bina Crude Pipeline Project from Vadinar in the State ofGujrat to Bina in the State ofMadhya Pradesh by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited; -Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 23rd November, 2008;

And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 ofthe said Act, submitted its report to the Central Government ;

Andwhereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government directs that the Right of User in the said land, specified in the Schedule , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration, in Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State : M.P.

District: Shajapur

Tehsil : Mo. Badodiya

Area in Hectare

SurveyNo ..

Sl . No.

Name ofVillage

0.05

162

Sagadiya

[F.No. R-31015/23 /2008 -OR- II ]

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.

1088

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 572. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण संख्या -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2. Workman is not present . No representative of the workman is present . Representative of the management. is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times. None was present for the workman . It is now 4 PM. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Govt . because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference . Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Govt. Central Government be informed. Chandigarh: 30-1-09 Camp at Kurukshetra

[सं. एल-22012/141/2000- आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009 MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi, the 10th February, 2009

का.आ. 573. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण संख्या -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 7/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

S.O. 572. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No5 /2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, No.1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on10-02-2009.

[सं. एल-22012/ 143/2000- आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 10th February , 2009 [No. L- 22012/ 141/2000- IR ( CM - II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER . CENTRAL GOVT . , INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT- I , CHANDIGARH

Case No. 5/2001

Shri Naresh Kumar, C/o Sh . Krishan Lal , Model Town, Bhattu Mandi , Fetehabad .

S.O. 573. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No 7/2001 ) of the Central Government industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on10-02-2009.

.....Applicant

Versus

[No. L-22012/143 /2000- IR ( CM - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Hissar , Hissar,Haryana.

Respondent

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. , APPEARANCES

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, -I CHANDIGARH.

None

For the workman :

Case No. 7/2001

For the management : Shri Pramodjain

AWARD

Shri Sandeeph Kumar , C/ o Sh . Krishan Lal , Model Town. Bhattu Mandi , Fetehabad .

Passed on: 30-1-09 Camp Kurukshetra

-Applicant

Versus

CentralGovt . vide notification No. -L22012/ 141 /2000- IR( CM - II) , dated 21-11-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:--

The District Manager , Food Corporation of India Hissar , Hissar, Haryana.

Respondent .

APPEARANCES

For the workman :

None

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, in terminating the services of Shri Naresh Kumar son of Shri Hari Ram , Security Guard, w.e.f. August , 97 is legal , justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

Forthe management : Shri Pramodjain 1089 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Versus

AWARD

TheDistrict Manager , Food Corporation ofIndia Gurgaon, Passed on: 30-1-09 Camp Kurukshetra

Haryana.

-Respondent

APPEARANCES

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-22012/ 143 /2000- IR(CM- II), dated 21-11-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

None

Forthe workman :

Shri Pramod jain

For the management :

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-09 Camp Kurukshetra "Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, in terminating the services of Shri Sandeep Kumar son of Ram Partap , Security Guard, w.e.f. August, 97 is legal justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled ?""

CentralGovt. vide notification No. L-22012/107/2000- IR(CM- II) , dated 08-09-2000 has has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, in terminating the services of Shri Vinod Kumar son of Rati Ram, w.e.f. 5-5-99 is legal andjustified? If not, to what relief the workman isentitled ?"

2. Workman is not present . No representative ofthe workman is present . Representative ofthe management is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times . None was present for the workman . It is now 4 PM . At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Govt . because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference .Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Govt. Central Govt . be informed.

Chandigarh: 30.1.09

Camp at Kurukshetra

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2009

2. Workman is not present. No representative ofthe workman is present . Representative of the management is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times. None was present for the workman. It is now 4 PM . At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Govt. because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference. Accordingly , the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Govt. Central Govt. be informed.

Chandigarh:30-1-09

Camp at Kurukshetra

G.K. SHARMIA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 574. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947.(1947) का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण संख्या -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 367/2001 ) कोप्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ. था।

का.आ. 575.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 [सं. एल-22012/ 107/2000-आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 10th February, 2009

का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण संख्या-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/147/2000- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी S.O. 574. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No 367/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No.1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-02-2009.

New Delhi, the 10th February, 2009 [No. L-22012/ 107 /2000- IR (CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA,

PRESIDING OFFICER. CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT- I CHANDIGARH

Case No. 367/2000

S.O. 575. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No 1/2001) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on10-02-2009.

Shri Vinod Kumar , S/o Sh. Rati Ram, village Bhunapur , PO: Tigaw, District Faridabad- Haryana.

[No. L-22012/ 147/2000- IR (CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

-Applicant

695 G1/ 09-13 1090

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009 /PHALGUNA 16; 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] ANNEXURE

New Delhi, the 10th February, 2009 BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- I, CHANDIGARH

Case No. 1/2001

Shri Anand Kumar, Son of Anupam , Model Town, Bhattu Mandi, Fetehabad .

-Applicant

Versus

S.O. 576. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award. (Ref. No. 63/1998) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No.1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on10-02-2009.

The District Manager, Food Corporation of India Hissar , Hissar, Haryana

[No. L -22012/35/1997- IR (C- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

-Respondent

APPEARANCES

ANNEXURE

For the Workman:

None

For theManagement: Shri Pramod Jain

AWARD

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- I, CHANDIGARH

Passed on: 30-1-09 Camp Kurukshetra

Case No. 63/1998

Shri Ram Mehar Singh Son of Shri Suraj Mal , resident of House No. 1652, Urban Estate, Jind, Haryana.

Central Government vide notification No. L- 22012/ 147/2000- IR (CM- II ), dated 21-11-2000 has referredthe following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

--Applicant

Versus

TheDistrict Manager , Food Corporation of India Rohtak, Haryana

--Respondent .

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, in terminating the services of Shri Anand Kumar son of Anupam, Security Guard, w.e.f. August, 97 is legal justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman :

None

For the management: Shri Pramod Jain

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-2009 , Camp Kurukshetra

Central Government vide notification No. L- 22012 / 35/1997- IR (C- II), dated 11-3-1998 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

2. Workman is not present. No representative of the workman is present. Representative of the management is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times . None was present for the workinan . It is now 4 PM. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference . Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government . Central Government be informed.

Chandigarh: 30-1-09 G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

Camp at Kurukshetra

"Whether there existed employer- employee relationship between Shri Ram Mehar Singh Watchman and the Management of Food Corporation of India ? If Yes, whether the termination of services of Shri Ram Mehar Singh w.e.f. 18-12-1995 is legal andjustified ? Ifnot, to what relief is he entitled ? "

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 576. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या-1, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 63/1998) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2. Workman is not present. No representative ofthe workman is present. Representative of the management is present . Since morning, this reference was taken up several times . None was present for the workman. It is now 4 PM. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference. Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government . Central Government be informed.

Chandigarh: 30-1-09.G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer [सं. एल-22012/ 35/ 1997 - आई आर ( सी-II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

Camp at Kurukshetra [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1091

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009

18-12-1995 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is he entitled ? "

का.आ. 577. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/ 30/1997- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

2.Workman is not present . No representative ofthe workman is present . Representative of the management is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times . None was present for the workman. It is now 4PM. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interest in adjudicatiori of this reference . Accordingly , the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government. Central Government be informed.

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2009

Chandigarh : 30-1-09 G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

Camp at Kurukshetra

नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2009

S.O. 577. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 69/1998 ) of the CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Cout No.1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 10-02-2009.

[No. L-22012/30/1997- IR (C-II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

का.आ. 578.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 67/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

ANNEXURE

[सं. एल-22012/29/1997- आई आर (सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT -1 , CHANDIGARH

New Delhi, the 10th February, 2009 Case No. 69/1998

Shri Ved Prakash

...Applicant

Versus

The DistrictManager , Food Corporation of India Rohtak, Haryana.

...Respondent .

APPEARANCES

S.O. 578. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 67/1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No.1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on10-02-2009.

For the workman:

None

[No. L-22012/29/ 1997- IR (C- II ) ] Shri Pramod Jain

For the management :

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer AWARD

ANNEXURE

Passed on: 30-1-09 , Camp Kurukshetra

Central Government vide notification No. L-22012/ 30/1997-IR (C-II) , dated 11-3-1998 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. 67/1998

Shri Bihari Lal

...Applicant "Whether there existed employer - employee relationship between Shri Ved Parkash Watchman and the Management of FCI ? If Yes , whether the termination of services of Shri Ved Parkash w.e.f.

1092

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

Versus

The District Manager , Food Corporation of India Rohtak, Haryana.

..Respondent.

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

APPEARANCES

Case No. 361/2000

None

For the workman:

Shri Pramod Jain

Forthe management:

AWARD

Shri Mulak Raj son of Shri Chand , Village , Bhunapur , PO: Tigaw, District Faridabad- Haryana ....Applicant

Passed on: 30-1-09 Camp Kurukshetra

Versus

Central Government vide notification No. L - 22012/ 29/ 1997- IR (CM - II ) , dated 11-3-1998 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

TheDistrictManager , Food Corporation of India Gurgoan , Haryana.

...Respondent .

APPEARANCES

None

For the workman :

Shri Pramod Jain

For the management:

"Whether there existed employer - employee relationship between Bihari Lal Watchman and the management of FCI ? If Yes , whether the termination of services of Shri Bihari Lal w.e.f. 18-12-1995 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is he entitled ? "

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-09 Camp Kurukshetra

Central Government vide notification No. L-22012/ 106/2000 - IR ( CM - II ) , dated 8-9-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of FCI in terminating the services of Shri Mulak Raj son of Shri Chand Security Guard , w.c.f. 5-5-99 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. Workman is not present. No representative ofthe workman is present. Representative of the management is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times.None waspresent for the workman . It is now 4 p . m . Atthis stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interest in adjudication of this reference . Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government . Central Government informed.

Chandigarh : 30-1-09 G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

Camp at Kurukshetra

2.Workman is not present . No representative of the workman is present . Representative of the management is present. Since morning , this reference was taken up several times. None was present for the workman . It is now 4 pm . Atthis stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interest in adjudication of this reference . Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government . Central Government be informed.

Chandigarh: 30-1-09

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009 का.आ. 579. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का. 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 361/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

Camp at Kurukshetra

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer [सं. एल-22012/106/2000- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th February , 2009

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 580, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

S.O. 579. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 361 / 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No.1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-02-2009.

[सं. एल-22012/148/2000- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी [No. L-22012/106/2000- IR (C- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 1093 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930.

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2009

का.आ. 581.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 65/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

S.O. 580. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2001 ) . of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , No.1 , Chandigarh asshown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-02-2009 .

[No.L- 22012/ 148/2000- IR(C- II)]

[सं. एल-22012/32/1997- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

NewDelhi, the 10th February,2009

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA,

PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-1,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. 3/2001

Shri Raj Kumar, S/o Sh. Net Ram, Modal Town , Bhattu Mandi , Fetehabad Faridabad.

S.O. 581.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.65/1998) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-02-2009.

...Applicant

Versus

[No. L-22012/32/ 1997-IR. (C- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

The District Manager , Food Corporation of India Hissar , Haryana.

...Respondent

APPEARANCES

None

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM LABOUR COURT- 1 , For the workman:

CHANDIGARH

Shri Pramod Jain

Forthe management:

Case No. 65/1998

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-09 Camp Kurukshetra

Shri Ram Mehar Singh son of Shri Suraj Mal resident of House No. 1652, Urban Estate, Jind, Haryana .

...Applicant

Versus

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-22012/ 148/2000- IR(CM- II) , dated 21-11-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

TheDistrictManager , Food Corporation of India Rohtak, Haryana.

...Respondent

APPEARANCES

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, in terminating the services of Shri Raj Kumar Son of Sh. Net Ram, SecurityGuard, w.e.f. August- 97 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

None

For the workman :

Shri Pramod Jain

For the management:

AWARD

Passed on:30-1-09 Camp Kurukshetra

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-22012/32/1997- IR (CM- II), dated 11-3-1998 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

2.Workman is not present . No representative ofthe workman is present . Representative ofthe management is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times. None was present for the workman. It is now 4 pm. Atthis stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication ofthis reference. Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government Central Government be informed.

Chandigarh: 30-1-09

Camp at Kurukshetra.

"Whether there existed employer - employee relationship between Shri Ram Mehar Singh watchman and the management of FCI ? If yes , whether the termination of services of Shri Satbir Singh w.e.f. 18-12-1995 is legal andjustified? Ifnot, to what relief is he entitled? "

G.K. SHARMA, PresidingOfficer

695 61/ 09-14 1094

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-09 Camp , Kurukshetra

1. Central Govt . vide notification No. -L22012/305/ 1997 -IR(C- II ), dated 27-2-1998 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

2.Workman is not present . No representative ofthe workman is present. Representative of the management is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times . None was present for the workman . It is now 4 p.m. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication ofthis reference . Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government. Central Government be informed.

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India , Rohtak in dispensing with the services of Shri Gopi Chand , Watchman w.e.f. 1-5-1991 is just and legal ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled to? "

Chandigarh: 30-1-09 G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

Camp at Kurukshetra

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 582.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय संख्या -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 47/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2.Workman is not present. No representative of the workman is present . Representative of the managerment is presentwho has filed one affidavit of Shri Surender Singh Taxak, Area Manager FCI , Rohtak . Since morning , this reference was taken up several times . None was present for the workman . It is now 4 p.m. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference . Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government . Central Government be informed .

Chandigarh : 30-1-09 Camp at Kurukshetra

[सं. एल-22012/305/ 1997-आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th February, 2009

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2009

S.O. 582. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 47/1998) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No.1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on10-02-2009.

का.आ. 583. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय , संख्या-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 7/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[No. L- 22012/305/ 1997 - IR (C -II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

[सं. एल-22012/60/2005- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2009 BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IN DUSTTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH. Case No. 47/1998

Shri Gopi Chand, C/o Sh. Chandgi Ram , Village & PO. Moorkhi, Teh. Safidon, District Jind, Haryana . ...Applicant

Versus

TheDistrict Manager, Food Corporation of India, Rohtak, ...Respondent

S.O. 583. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Cehtral Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.7 /2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court No.1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10-02-2009 .

APPEARANCES

For the workman :

None

Forthe management : Shri Pramod Jain

[No. L- 22012/60/2005 - IR(CM- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 1095 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 10th February, 2009 ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA,

PRESIDING OFFICER. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IN DUSTTRIALTRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT-1, CHANDIGARH

Case No. 7/2006

Shri Randhir Singh, C/o Sh. Dharampal , Village Chandana, Teh & District, Kaithal, Haryana.

...Applicant

S.O. 584. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.49/1998) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, No.1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-02-2009.

Versus

[No. L-22012/307/ 1997-IR (C-II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR; Desk Officer The Sr. Regional Manager , FCI , SCO 120-122, Sector 17C, Chandigarh.

...Respondent

ANNEXURE

APPEARANCES

None

Forthe workman:

Shri N.K. Zakhmi

For the management:

AWARD

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH.

Case No. 49/1998

Passed on : 30-1-09 Camp Kurukshetra

Shri Ishwar Singh , C/o Sh. Chandgi Ram, Village & P.O. Moorkhi , Teh. Safidon, District Jind , Haryana .

...Applicant 1. CentralGovt. vide notification No. L22012/60/2005 -IR(CM- II), dated 21-12-2005 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Versus

TheDistrictManager , Food Corporation of India, Rohtak,

...Respondent

APPEARANCES

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, Karnal in terminating the services of Shri Randhir instead of regularizing is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

None

Forthe workman :

For the management: Shri Pramodjain

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-09, Camp Kurukshetra

1. Central Govt. vide notification No. L -22012/307/ 1997 -IR (C- II) , dated 27-2-1998 has referred the following disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication:

2. Workman is not present. No representative of the workman is present. Representative ofthe management is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times.None was present for the workman. It is now 4 P.M. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication ofthis reference. Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government . Central Government be informed .

Chandigarh:30-1-09

Camp at Kurukshetra

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, Rohtak in dispensing with the services of Shri Ishwar Singh, Watchman w.e.f. 1-5-1991 is just and legal? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled to?"

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी, 2009

2.Workman is not present . No representative ofthe workman is present. Representative ofthe management, is present who has filed one affidavit of Shri Surender Singh Taxak, Area Manager , FCI , Rohtak. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times . None was present for the workman. It is now 4 p.m. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference . Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government. Central Government be informed.

का.आ. 584, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय संख्या -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 49/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Chandigarh: 30-1-09

Camp at Kurukshetra G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer [सं. एल-22012/307/1997- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी 1096

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 7, 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] नईदिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009

2. In order to ensure fairness and transparency , both the parties were hard . The Management and the Workman has submitted a joint petition stating inter- alia that the matter has been settled up amicably out of Court and the Memorandum of Settlement marked as ANNEXURE - X has also been submitted duly signed by the workman and the Management side.

का.आ. 585. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आई.ओ.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , गुवाहाटी के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 04/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था!

3. Heard the learned Counsel for the Management aswell as the Workman personally.

[सं. एल-30012/5/2008- आई.आर. ( एम) ]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2009

4. The statement of the workman has been recorded on oath, wherein he has stated that the matter has been settled up amicably and according the Memorandum of Settlement marked ANNEXURE - X , executed on 1-7-2008 has been submitted. The Workman has prayed before this Court that the necessary Award may be passed in terms of theMemorandum of Settlement.

S.O. 585. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.. 4/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Guwahati now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of IOCL and their workman, which was receivedbythe Central Government on 10-2-2009.

5. Having heard both sides and having considered the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the Case the matter stands disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement . The Memorandum of Settlement shall form part oftheAward.

[No. L-30012/5/2008 - IR (M ) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

Givenunder my hand and seal of this Court on this 2ndday ofFebruary, 2009 at Guwahati.

ANNEXURE

D. K. DEB ROY , Presiding Officer

ANNEXURE- ' X'

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, GUWAHATI ASSAM

Present: Shri D. K. Deb Roy , Presiding Officer

MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT PresidingOfficer , CGIT-Cum - Labour Court, Guwahati In the matter of an Industrial Dispute between :

TheManagement Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

-Vrs-

This settlement is arrived at between the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Assam Oil Division) (IOCL) (AOD) representedby its Chief Human Resources Manager and between Sri S. D. Balmiki , retired employee onmedical ground, on this 1st date of July, 2008 at Digboi .

TheirWorkman , Shri S. D. Balmiki Ref. Case No. 04 of 2008.

APPEARANCES

For the Management:

1. Sri S. N. Sarma

2. Sri N. Sarma

For the Workman :

None appeared.

DateofAward : 2-2-2009

AWARD

1. The present reference Case is arising out ofOrder No. L-30012/5/2008 - IR(M); Dated 5-5-2008 , issued by Government of India, Ministry of Labour for adjudicating the following dispute.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Indian OilCorporation Ltd. ( Assam Oil Division) , Digboi Refinery is justified in denying the employment of one dependent ofSh . S. D. Balmiki under the option- III of SABF Scheme . If so , what benefit Sh. Balmiki is entitled to?"

That Sri S. D. Balmiki , an employee of the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Assam Oil Division) (IOCL)(AOD) was retired pre -maturely on medical ground due to his deteriorated health condition after due assessment by Medical Board w.e.f. 1-12-2001 . After his retirement , the workman claimed that one of his dependent son may be given employment under option III of Super Annuation Benefit Fund ( SABF) Scheme , though he was fully aware that employment to the dependent is permissible only when an employee who dies while in service or suffers permanent total disablement which results from an incident/accident arising out of employment under option III of the SABF scheme. In the instant case as the workman was retired due toillhealth on medical ground , option III of SABF scheme is not applicable to him . Accordingly, the management rejected the demand of the workman. On this issue the workman raised an industrial dispute which has been referred by the appropriate Government for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court, Guwahati vide notification dated 5-5-2008 .On receipt 1097 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

न्यायालय सं. 2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-2/43/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

ofthe said notification the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Guwahati has registered a case being Reference Case No. 4/08 and issue noticeto the parties.

[सं. एल-30011/20/2006- आईआर ( एम) ]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 10th February , 2009

Inthe meantime one ofthe son ofthe workman namely Sri Ranjit Balmiki has appeared in the selection process of "Process Operator " advertised by the IOCL( AOD) . However, the result of the said selection is yet to be declared. In the meantime, the workman has approched the management to settle the dispute between the parties out of Court. The management ultimately on humanitarian ground has agreed to settle the dispute pending before Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court onthe following:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

S.O. 586. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT-2/43/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. 2 Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BPCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-2-2009.

[No.L-30011 /20/2006- IR (M ) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer 1. That the management agrees to consider favourlythe candidature ofSri Ranjit Balmiki , son ofthe workman provided he fulfills all the requisite criteria of recruitment .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

Present: Shri A. A. Lad, Presiding Officer Ref. No. CGIT - 2/43 of 2006

2. That on the assurance given by the management, and subject to employment of his son, Sri Ranjit Balmiki, in the IOCL(AOD), theworkman agrees that he has no further claim against the management under option III of the SABF scheme and all his claims against themanagement is fully and finally settled.

Employers in Relation to the Management ofBharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

The Sr. Manager (HRS-West)

BharatPetroleum Corporation Ltd:

BharatBhawan

4& 6, Currimbhoy Road,

3. Thatthis agreement fully and finally settles all the disputes between the workman and the management and the workman agrees that he will not raise any further claim against the management in respect ofhis dependent under SABF scheme .

Mumbai 400038 .

BallardEstate V/s.

Their Workman

The General Secretary

4. That both theparties agree that a joint petition will be filed before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court, Guwahati annexing the present agreement for passing an ' Award' in terms ofthis agreement .

Bhartiya Kamgar Karamchari Mahasangh

Inwitness whereof both the parties hereto have signed this agreement on this 1st day of July, 2008.

5, Navalkar Lane , 1st Floor

For the management

Witness

Prafulla Chandra Sunnul

Prarthna Samaj

1. Haseen Ahmed

Girgaon

ChiefHRManager

2.Anup Tamuli

Mumbai-400004 ..

S. D. Balmiki

3.RajitBalmiki

Workman

APPEARANCES

4. Tarun Hazila

President

Mr. R. S. Pai, Advocate

Forthe Employer

A/ c Labour Union

Mr. Abhay Kulkarni ,

For the Workman

Advocate. नई दिल्ली,10 फरवरी , 2009

Mumbai, the 9th January, 2009 .

AWARD

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour by its OrderNo. L- 30011 /20/2006/ IR( M) dated 14-7-2006 in exercise का.आ. 586.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.पी.सी.एल. के. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम

69561/ 09-15 1098

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]

V/s. R. G. Khose and others

..Respondents.

ofthe powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

Mr. J. P. Cama, Senior Advocate with Mr. R. S. Pai and Ms. Pallavi Dedhla to M/s . Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Petitioner.

"Whether the action of the management of BPCL, Marketing Division , Mumbai in terminating the services of Shri R. G. Khose is Justified ? Ifnot, what relief Shri R. G. Khose is entitled to ? "

Mr. Abhay Kulkarni for Respondent No. 1 . CORAM: Dr. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD , J. 15thDecember, 2008

P. C.:

2. Claim statement is filed by second party at Ex -6 which is repliedby first party by filling written statement at Ex-9 and reference was fixed for framing issues.

3.Meanwhile Hon'ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 8085 of2008 considering the order passed by CGIT in Approval Application filed under Section 33 (2) (b ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, accepted settlement took place out of Court and while disposing of said Approval Application on request of the parties also disposed ofthe reference pending before this Tribunal in terms of the consent terms presented before Hon'ble High Court , Mumbai . It is brought on record by both parties with Ex- 13 . Hence the order :

ORDER

InviewofEx- 13 , reference is disposed of.

Date: 9-1-2009

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer

BEFORE THE C.G.I.T. No. II GI MUMBAI , ΕΧΗ . Νο . 13

The Petition arises out of an order passed by the Presiding Officer of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal bywhich the Tribunal declined to grant approval under Section 33 (2)( b ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. First Respondent was dismissed from service on 24th July, 2005, after 27 years of service . He was due for retirement , if hehad remained in service , on 30th June, 2009. During the course of the hearing of the Petition , the first Respondent ispersonallypresent in the Court . Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the First " Disclaimer Clause : Authenticated copy is not a Certified Copy " Respondent have during the course of the hearing Tendered Counsel Terms signed by the learned counsel and by the First Respondent in terms whereof the entire dispute between the parties has been settled in view thereof, the Petition shall stand disposed of interms ofthe Consent Terms which are taken on the record and marked as " X " The approval application and the reference before the Industrial Tribunal shall stand disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms .

HIGH COURT ( A. S. ) BOMBAY W. P. No. 8085 of 2008

B. P. C.L.

V/s. -Petitioner R/of C.G.I.T : II/43/06 Between B. P. C. L. AND Their Workman (R. G. Khose)

R. B. Khose & on

Respondents May I Please the Hon'ble Court

Consent Terms

The Corporation pray that in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court , Bombay, in W. P. No. 8085 of 2008 in 15-12-2008 the above reference be disposed ofas per the said order ofthe Hon'ble High Court , Bombay .

In substitution of the order pound by the Industrial Tribunal on 31-10-2008 in Annual appendix C.G.I.T.-2/ 15 of 2005 Petition agreed to following terms:

Mumbai Dated 9-1-09

Advocate for Corporation : Advocate for the Workman :

R. S. Pai , Advocate Mr. Abhay Kulkarni ] Advocate .

1. In bow of the down of first Respondent to reinstatement and back wages the Petition shall pay to first Respondent a sum equivalent to two years ofthe last drawn wages inclusive of all endowments within a period of two weeks fromtoday .

HIGH COURT , BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITΙΟΝ ΝΟ . 8085 OF 2008

..Petitioner

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

2. The order of disowned panel by management shall stand substituted by the parent engagement and the 1st Repunishment shall be deemed to have ultimately relinquished service w.e.f. date of order of disordered .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1099

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

DateofPassingAward-23rd December,2008 Between:

3. The Petition has already paid to 1st Respondent all reimbursement dues P.F. due was paid to 1st Respondent amount of Rs . 64,64,63 on January, 2008 and Gratuity amount ofRs . 3 , 37, 700.

The Management ofDeputy GeneralManager , Sukinda Chromite Mines of TISCO, P.O. Kalarangiatta, Distt. Jaipur-755001 .

... 1st Party-Management .

AND

4. The 1st Respondent shall be entitled to medical benefits as are provided to and applicable to all others .

..2ndParty-Workman.

Their Workman , Shri Lalit Kumar Mahalik, P. No. 195813 , Sukinda Chromite Mines ofTISCO, P.O. Sukinda, Jaipur -755 001.

5. The 1st Respondent shall also be entitled to Superannuation Pension Schemes as applicable.

APPEARANCES

6. The Pending Reference before Tribunal will also stand disposed of.

7. W. P. is accordingly disposed off.

M/s. B. P. Tripathy & Associates Advocates M/s. S. Mishra & Associates

Advocates

...For the 1st Party- Management. ... For the 2nd Party- Workman.

Place:Mumbai

AWARD

Dated: 15-12-2008 .

(R. G.Khose)

Abhay Kulkarni ,

Respondent No. 1

Adv. forR- 1

R. S. Pai , Advocate forPublication

1. TheGovernment ofIndia in the Ministry ofLabour, in exercise ofpowers conferred by Clause (d) of sub -section (1) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 29012/113/ 97/IR(M), dated 15-6-1998 .

नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2009

"Whether the demand of the workman Shri Lalit Kumar Mahalik, Personal No. 195813 of Sukinda Chromite Mines of TISCO for reinstatement with full backwages isjustified? Ifso, what reliefthe workman isentitled to ?"

का.आ. 587.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सुकिन्दा क्रोमाइट माईन्स ऑफ टिस्को के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , भुवनेशवर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 170/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[ सं. एल-29012/ 113/1997- आईआर ( एम) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 10th February, 2009

S.O. 587. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 170/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Sukinda Chromite Mines of Tisco and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-2-2009 .

[No. L- 29012/ 113/ 1997 - IR( M ) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL "TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present: Shri N. K. R. Mohapatra Presiding Officer , Tr. Industrial Dispute Case No. 170/2001

2. The father of the disputant - workman was an employee under the Management . As his retirement age came closure he made a representation to provide a job to his son, the disputant who was qualified to be appointed inany clericaljob. The Management on such request agreed to consider the case of the disputant whenever such vacancies would be available . In the meantime it engaged the workman as a Mazdoor in corisecutive terms for 30 days and 85 days by issuing separate appointment letters each time . The Management in its first letter dated 11-9-1991 (Ext. -2) appointed him as Mazdoor on temporary basis for a period of 85 days commencing from 19-7-1991 and thereafter from time to time he was given separate appointment orders . These appointment letters figured as Ext-2 to 2/11 . Ext. -2/ 11 the last letter is dated 6-1-1994 and it was issued for a period of 30 days . The workman alleged that after expiry of the said period he was refused of employment with effect from 8-2-1994 without any compensation etc. It is further alleged that even though the Management assured him from time to time to accommodate him in a better post be fitting his qualification he was also not given any such accommodation even though some of the Mazdoors who were working along with him were absorbed permanently. After being refused employment with effect from 8-2-1994 the workman approached the Management several times with the hope.

1100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] that he wouldbe accommodated elsewhere . But not being successful in his said attempt he ultimately raised an Industrial Dispute before the Asst . Labour Commissioner (Central) resulting in the present reference .

date remained absent for which he was again set exparte on3-6-2008 and on 24-6-2008 the exparte evidence ofthe workman was recorded and the case was posted to 15-7-2008 for argument . Most surprisingly the legal representative of the Management appeared on that day andmoved a petition to set aside the exparte order but did not like to pay the arrear cost and in consequence he remained exparte .

6.While adducing exparte evidence the workman alone examined himself besides producing several documents marked as Ext. - 1 , 2 , 2/1 to 2/11 and 3 to 6 .

FINDINGS

ISSUE NO . 1

7. Since the disputant was admittedly engaged as a Mazdoor in the mines of the Management - Company there appears every justification to hold that the reference is maintainable .

ISSUE NOS . 2 TO 4

3. While giving his reply to the above contention of the workman the Management filed its written statement admitting the entire period of engagement as claimed by the workman . Going little further it also contended that after the workman was disengaged on 8-2-1994 he was again given a letter of appointment after gap of seven months on 5-9-1994 for a period of 85 days . The Management also filed all such appointment letters that were issued to the workman from time to time and these are nothing but the self same documents which have been marked as Ext. -2 to 2/11 from the side of the workman . By admitting almost the entire case of the workman , the Management simply contended that the workman was engaged as a Mazdoor to assist in the plantation work as and when required for a specific period depending upon job requirement . But due to recruitment of experts , fencing of the plantation area, introduction ofdump plantation and its entrustment to contractors , there was no necessity of engaging the workman and therefore he was disengaged from 8-2-1994 after the engagement period was over as per appointment letter dated 6-1-1994. It is further averred by the Management that since the workman's engagement was term based, there was no necessity to pay him any retrenchment compensation when he was finally disengaged from 8-2-1994 onwards and as such the question of his reinstatement does not arise .

4. On the basis of the above pleadings ofthe parties the following issues were framed.

ISSUES

1 . Whether the reference is maintainable ?

8. These issues are taken up together as they are inter- linked. Before dealing with the merit of the case , I would like to repeat here that the Management during pre- hearing stage filed several documents in support of his case on 18-9-2001 . Some of these documents refer to those of the documents which have been marked as Ext . - 2 and Ext. -2/ 1 to 2/11 . These are nothing but appointment letters issued to the workman from time to time. Since basing on these documents the Management has admitted in its pleadings that after engaging the workman on 19-7-1991 for a specified period had subsequently extended it from time to time until he was refused employment on 8-2-1994, the only question that emerges for consideration is whether the said refusal of employment amounts to retrenchment or not so as to attract Section 25 -F of the Industrial Disputes Act .

2. Whether the termination of the disputant is covered under Section-2 (oo) (bb ) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 ?

9. Section 25- F specifies that a workman employed in "continuous service " for not less than one year is entitled in the event of his retrenchment to be served with a one month notice or one month pay in lieu thereof besides being paid retrenchment compensation .

3. Whether the demand of the 2nd Party- Workman for reinstatement with full back wages is justified?

4. What relief the 2nd Party is entitled to?

10. Section 25 - B which deals with the term "continuous service " specify under its clause (2) read with sub - clause 2 (a ) and 2(a) ( ii ) that where a workman is not in continuous uninterrupted service during a given period within the meaning of Clause - I, then in that case he shall be deemed to be in " continuous service " during a period ofone year if he has worked for 240 days during a period of12 calender months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made .

11. Thus for the purpose of calculating the continuous service of a workman over a period of one year it is not necessary that his engagement period over a period of one year should be continuous without any gap . Rather 5. At the hearing the Management chronically remained absent on and off for which he was set exparte number of times . However each time he was restored to file on his paying the cost. While this was going on the Management again remained absent for which he was last set exparte on 29-8-2007 . To provide him a further chance he was restored to file on 22-10-2007 with cost of Rs . 500 which he paid on 7-11-2007 . But despite the same he again remained absent repeatedly for several dates and on 21-4-2008 his legal representative moved a petition for time . This petition though allowed same day with cost of Rs . 1000 the Management did not pay the cost on the next 1101 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7 , 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

as per Section 25 -B clause-2 read with clause 2(a) and2( a) ( ii ) if a workman works for 240 days during a period of 12 months preceding the date of his termination, he shall be deemedtohave rendered continuous service during a year for the purpose of Section 25 -F of the Industrial Disputes Act.

employment procedure . These suggest that the workman was engaged time to time as a Mazdoor giving him the hope to wait until his chances come . It also suggests that in the garb of temporary engagement the workman was beingexploited. In such circumstances the Management is directed to provide an opportunity to the workman to compete in the next recruitment test likely to be held in near future . Besides for terminating him illegally the Management is further directed to reinstate the workman in his former post by giving a consolidated amount of Rs.50,000 toward his back wages , calculated on an average basis, within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

16.Accordingly the reference is answered exparte against the Management.

N.K.R. MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

List of witnesses examined on behalf of the 2nd Party- Workman.

W.W. - 1-Shri Lalit Kumar Mahalik

12. It has been admitted by the Management that the workmanwas disengaged from 8-2-1994. Now therefore it is necessary to find out for how many days the workman was engaged during 12 months preceding 8-2-1994 i.e. during8-2-1993 to 8-2-1994 . His appointment letters dated 27-2-1993, 5-10-1993 , 30-10-1993, 3-12-1993 and6-1-1994 marked respectivelyas Ext. -2/7, 2/8 , 2/9 , 2/10 and 2/11 show that he was given engagement for a period of 180 days in Ext. -2/7 and thereafter for a period of 30 days each time, calculatedto 300 days during 8-2-1993 to 8-2-1994 . Therefore as per the deeming clause 2, 2(a) and 2(a)( ii) of Section 25-B of the Act the workman is held to be in continuous service for more than one year by the time he was disengaged on 8-2-1994, fulfilling the requirements of Section 25- F of the Industrial Disputes Act .

List ofDocuments exhibited on behalf of the 2nd Party- Workman.

Ext.- 1 -Letter ofManagement No. 9998/22 .

Ext. -2-Appointment letter No. 661 .

Ext. -2/ 1 -Appointment letter No. 1071 .

Ext. -2/2 -Appointment letter No. 1259.

Ext. -2/3 -Appointment letter No. 63.

Ext.-2/4-Appointment letter No.492 .

13. It has been averred by the Management in its written statement that since the workman was given appointment against a specific job of plantation work, his termination after the specific period of engagement can not be regarded as a case ofretrenchment. But I am inclined not to accept the said view of the Management in as much as there is no mention in any of the appointment letters that he was engaged against any specified job .

Ext.-2/5 -Appointment letter No.7fs.

Ext. -2/ 6-Appointment letter No. 1026.

Ext. -2/7 -Appointment letter No. 219.

Ext. -2/8 -Appointment letterNo. 1418.

Ext. -2/9-Appointment letter No. 1566.

Ext. -2/10-Appointment letter No. 1792.

Ext. -2/ 11 -Appointment letter No.42.

Ext.-3-Letter dated 2-2-1995 ofDGM (P & IR) R.M.

Ext. -3/ 1 -Letter dated 28-3-1995.

Ext.-3 /2-Representation dated 15-11-1996.

Ext.-3/3-Representation dated 20-8-1997.

Ext. -4-P.F. Receipt .

Ext.-5-Reply ofManagement to the A.L.C. (C) , Bhubaneshwar .

14. Section 2( oo) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act which defines the term "retrenchment" speak that termination of aworkman for any reason whatsoever would amount to retrenchment. But termination made by way of disciplinary action or cases falling under clause a, b (bb) & c would not amount to retrenchment . Since the case of the workman is not falling under any of the exceptional clauses his termination is held to be a case of retrenchment and such retrenchment having not been made , as admitted by the Management, in accordance with the provisions ofSection 25-F, I futher hold that the action of the Management is highlyprejudicial and not in accordance with Section 25 -F ofthe Industrial Disputes Act.

Ext.-6-Letter ofShri Lalit Kumar Mahalik to A.L.C. (C), Bhubaneshwar .

Ext. -7-Letter of Management dated 24-9-1997 to Shri Lalit Kr. Mahalik.

List of Witnesses Exhibited on behalf of the 1st Party-

Management.

Nowitnesses examined on behalf of the Management .

List ofDocuments Exhibited on behalf of the 1st Party- Management.

No documents examined on behalf ofthe Management.

15. The evidence of the workman and the pleadings ofthe parties show that the disputant- workman was not engaged as a Mazdoor on daily rated basis. Rather he was beingpaid basic salary of Rs . 1350 per month along with admissible allowance, other perquisites and amenities of the company except living accommodation as evident from various appointment letters mentioned earlier . The representatives ofthe workman marked Ext . -3/2 show that. he possesses intermediate qualification in Arts . Ext. - 1 shows that he was once given assurance that he would be adjusted against any future vacancies according to 695 67/09-16 1102

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009

"Whether the action of the management of Northern Railway i.e. Deputy ChiefBridge Engineer , Jalandhar Cantt, in not giving the promotion in higher scale to the53 workers (As per list attached ) who have served with the Department about 26 years is legal and justified ? Ifnot , what relief the concerned workman and from which date is entitled to? " का.आ. 588. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्थन रेलवे प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ स. 1 , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 105/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -41012/ 172/2002- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 10th February, 2009

2.The case is taken up in Lok Adalat. Representative ofthe workmen Shri Kuldip Singh and Santokh Singh are present . On behalf of the management, Shri Jagtar Singh Deputy Chief Engineer and Rakesh Sharma Senior Welfare Inspector is present . It is settled in Lok Adalat that out of 53workers, few workers have already been given the benefit ofhigher scale on their promotion to group C. or rest ofthe workers on application (representation) will be moved to the office ofthe prescribed authority and if as per the rules of the department, they are eligible for higher scale, the same will be granted on availability of posts . On the basis of the above settlement, this reference is disposed off as settled in lok adalat . Central Govt . be informed.

S.O. 588. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.105/ 2003) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Northern Railway and their workman , received by the Central Government on 10-02-2009 .

Chandigarh. 23-1-2009

[No. L-41012/ 172/2002- IR(B- 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer ANNEXURE

नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2009

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICEER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 105/2003

का.आ. 589.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ तखनकोर प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण इरनाकूलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 140/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2006 को प्राप्त हुआ था। Shri Kuldeep Singh & others C/o Shri B.R. Prabhakar , 63- C, Kailash Nagar , Model Town , Ambala Cantt. (Haryana) .

[सं. एल-12012/222/2001- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

.... Applicant

Versus

NewDelhi , the 10th February, 2009 The Deputy Chief Engineer, Northern Railway, Jalundhar Cantt - 144001 .

.Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman :

S.O. 589. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 140 / 2006) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ernakulam . as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of Travancore , and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 10-02-2009 .

Shri Kuldip Singh and Santokh Singh

For the Management: Ms. Sinnint Kaur

[No. L- 12012/222/2001 - IR (B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer AWARD

ANNEXURE

Passed on : 23-1-09

Central Government vide notification No. L -41012/ 172/2002- IR(B- 1) dated 17-4-2003 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM Present: Shri P.L. Norbert , B.A. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer (Friday the 23rd day of January, 2009/ 3rd Magham 1930) 1103 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

I.D. 140/2006

(I.D. 14/2002 of Industrial Tribunal, Kollam)

: C. Sumathy,

Workman

Kalloor-Mahima, Punukkanoor ,

Perumpuzha. P.O. ,

Kollam-691504.

By Adv.N. K. Karnis .

management did not wait and proceeded with the domestic enquiry. The Branch Manager and other staff are also responsible in the alleged incident. The enquiry officer failed to appreciate the medical evidence. The worker enjoys anunblemished record ofservice of 13 years . But it is nottaken into considerationby the disciplinary authority while imposing the punishment. The punishment at any rate is disproportionate. Amock enquirywas conducted by the management. The worker is entitled to be reinstated with all benefits :

Management

The Assistant General Manager, IV, State Bank of

Travancore Region - IV , Zonal Office, Shanthinagar , Thiruvananthapuram .

By Adv. P. Ramakrishnan.

This case comming up for hearing on 20-01-2009 , this Tribunal -cum -Labour Court on 23-01-2009 passed the following.

AWARD

This is a reference made under Section 10(1 ) (d) of Industrial Disputes Act. The reference is ;--

"Whether the action of the management of the State Bank ofTravancore , Nallila Branch to dismiss Smt . C. Sumathyfrom service w.e.f. 28-08-2000 is justified? If not, what relief the said disputant is entitled and from which date? "

4.According to the management the worker did not submit an explanation to the memo of charges within the time stipulated. Hence the management ordered a domestic enquiry. On the basis of the evidence surfaced the enquiry officer came to the conclusion that the worker is guilty of the charges . The disciplinary authority carefully considered the enquiry proceedings , the enquiry report andmaterials on record and concurred with the findings of EnquiryOfficer. After hearing the worker and considering the gravity of the misconduct the disciplinary authority imposed the punishment ofdismissal . The worker preferred an appeal to the Deputy General Manager. But the appeal was rejected. Had the worker been suffering from any mental, illness it would have disabled her from attending to normal duties and she would have been advised by the banktokeep off from the duties. Therefore there is no truth inthe contentionthat she was suffering from mental illness . The worker was represented by a defence representative. The worker was given sufficient opportunity to adduce defence evidence . There was no coercion or intimidation to admit guilt. There is no basis for the allegation that Manager and other staff are involved in the incident . The fraudwas committed with due deliberation and application ofmind. The enquiry was conducted properly, observing the guidelines in the Bipartite Settlement and complying with the principles ofnatural justice . The dismissal ofthe workman from service is in no way illegal or unjust. The claim is liable to be dismissed .

5. In the light ofthe above contentions the following points arise for consideration :

2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows: - Smt.C.Sumathy was a Typist/Clerk of State Bank of Travancore, Nallila Branch .While so , she was charge sheeted for falsifying accounts of customers , committing forgery, withdrawing money from customer's account by using cheque leaves taken unauthorisedly from the bank and misappropriating Rs . 16,500 by various fraudulent transactions . An enquiry was conducted and she was found guilty of the charges . The disciplinary authority dismissed her from service . Though an appeal was filed she did not succeed . The findings and punishment are under challenge .

1. Are the findings sustainable?

2. Is the punishment proportionate?

The evidence consists of the oral testimony of MW 1 and the documentary evidence of Ext.M1 on the side of the management ..

6. Point No.l: - The worker Smt.C.Sumathy was a Typist/Clerk of State Bank of Travancore , NallilaBranch. Asper charge sheet dt . 13-03-2000 the allegation is that she had taken possession of a cheque book from the bank without the knowledge or authentication of supervisory official, falsified accounts, committed forgery, using cheque leaves withdrew money from customers ' accounts and misappropriated Rs.16,500 by various fraudulent. transactions on different dates . She was asked to submit a 3.According to the worker on 08-03-2000 the Branch Manager called her to his chamber and alleged that she had fraudulently withdrawn certain amounts from customers' accounts. The Assistant General Manager threatened her that she would be thrown out of service . She was compelled to write letters admitting the guilt . As she was suffering from manic depressive psychosis and was under treatment of a psychiatrist she could not resist the pressure of the management and wrote letters as directed by Assistant General Manager taking up the responsibility of the transactions . Rs.16,500 was also remittedby her on 09-03-2000. Thereafter she was placed under suspension and a charge sheet was issued and an enquiry was conducted. Though the worker had sought one month's time to reply to the charge sheet the 1104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] reply within 10 days ofthe charge sheet . However she did not reply within the stipulated time. Hence an enquiry was . ordered on 27-03-2000 . On 10-04-2000 she sent a reply to the management regarding the allegations against her . The enquiry commenced on 10-04-2000 . The worker was represented by a union representative . The enquiry spread over many days and concluded on 16-05-2000 . The management witnesses three in number were cross examined by the defence. Copies ofdocuments 12 in number were supplied to the defence . The defence had produced five documents . The worker and the defence representative had participated in the enquiry throughout . A copy of the enquiry report was supplied to the worker . Thus there is compliance with the principles of natural justice and the terms ofBipartite Settlement .

09-03-2000 is a letter of the worker to the Branch Manager stating that she was sending Rs . 16,500 for remittance as well as forwarding the remaining unused cheque leaves through a bearer. She was sending the money and unused cheque leaves, from her home . She was free to admit or deny the allegations in Ext.PE3 as there could have been no compulsionfrom any official of the bank. Similarly she could have either returned or retained the unused cheque leaves . It is relevant to note that for the first time she took up a contention of involuntary admission of guilt only in the appeal and not at any time prior to that (page 16 of Ext.M 1) . The learned counsel for the worker relying on a decision reported in State v. Gopinatha Pillai 1978 K.L.T. 779 submitted that a plea of guilt by itself without corroborative evidence , does not justify conviction of an accused. It is submitted by the leamed counsel that the Enquiry Officer basing on the admission of guilt by the worker came to the conclusion that she had committed the misconduct alleged and there is no other evidence to support the charge . The appreciation of evidence in a proceeding in criminal court and labour court is entirely different. The strict rule of evidence is not applicable to the proceedings in labour court. It is also contended by the learned counsel that the Enquiry officer had marked Ext.PE- 12 investigation report and relied on it without examining the Investigating Officer.

7. In the reply to the memo of charges submitted by the worker on 10-04-2000 she denied the charges and contended that she was suffering from manic depressive psychosis and that she was under treatment of a Psychiatrist at Trivandrum since January , 1999. It is also contended that she was discharging duties without application of mind and in a mechanical manner and that she was not mentally alert and so she had written letters admitting her responsibility in the alleged transactions . It was also contended that she had remitted Rs . 16,500 involuntarily. It is further stated that she has put in 13 years of unblemished service (page 28 of enquiry file- Ext.MI).

8.Ext.PE1 and PE2 are two letters even dated admitting the charges. It is seen explained by the Branch Manager as to why two letters were given on the same day . According to him it was to furnish more details about the transactions that the 2nd letter, Ext.PE2 was given . He also says that there was no compulsionby A.G.M. or anybody else to admit the guilt. In Ext.PE1 and 2 the worker admitted the guilt and expressed her willingness to make good the loss . At the end ofthe proceedings the enquiry officer had asked her whether she had anything more to say about the charges and she admitted her guilt again before the Enquiry Officer. It was done in the presence of the defence representative (page 52 of Ext.MI ) . The statement before theEnquiry Officer cannot at all be treated as an involuntary statement . The disciplinary authority had called for a representation of the worker regarding the findings of Enquiry Officer . She submitted her representation on 07-07-2000 to the disciplinary authority wherein again she admitted her guilt . However she also stated that she cannot remember as to how and why she had done the alleged transactions and that she was suffering from manic depressive psychosis at that time (page 8 of Ext.M1 ) . The letters admitting guilt, Exts.PEl and 2 were given to the BranchManager on 08-03-2000 and an amount ofRs . 16,500 alleged to have been misappropriated by the worker was remitted by her in the bank on 09-03-2000 . Ext.PE3 dated

9. It is not correct to say that there are no materials on record to find the guilt of the worker. But it is true that theEnquiry Officer has not properly analysed the evidence onrecord , but mainly relied on the admission of guilt . It is tobe noted that even if Ext. PE- 12 is discarded , there are other materials to prove the charges . Accordingto PW3 , the Branch Manager a customer of bank Sri . Appukuttan Pillai had reported about difference in balance shown in his pass book . When the ledger sheet concerned was perused it was seen that an amount of a previous transaction was corrected from Rs . il ,688 to Rs . 10,688 . Ext.PE5 is a statement of account of Sri .Appukuttan Pillai containing the correction of the amount . Smt . Santha Ramanan is the wife ofworkman's husband's brother. The modus operandi of the workman was that the amounts siphoned from customers' accounts used to be credited in the account of Smt . Santha Remanan and thereafter those amounts were withdrawn by the worker . Ext. PE6 is a statement of account ofSmt . Santha Remanan . Ext . PE7 is a pay in slip in respect ofRs . 10,000. Ext . PE8 is a cheque purported tohave been issued by customer Santha Remanan in favour of Remanan , the husband of Smt. Santha Remanan, but forged by the worker. Exts.PE9 and 10 are transfer scrolls . Ext.PE - 11 is a pay in slip for Rs.5,500 . These documents relate to the alleged transactions by manipulating the accounts and fraudulently debiting and crediting the amounts as well as withdrawing various amounts on various dates. PW1 to 3 have also supported the case of the management . PWI is the Assistant Manager of the Branch. , He identifies the 1105 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ofmind and deligence . It cannot be done by a person with aderailed mind . Therefore there is no merit in the conten- tionofthe worker regarding mental ill health .

There is ample evidence to prove the charges and the findings of Enquiry Officer requires no alteration .

11. Point No.2: - The punishment imposed is dismissal from service . The family is not financially unsound. Her husband is an officer of a bank. The fact that the worker has put in 13 years of unblemished service in the bank is not a reason to reduce the punishment as the misdeed committed is grave in nature , touching the honesty of the person and credibility of bank . It is not the number of in- stances of misconduct that is decisive of the quantum of penalty, but severity of the offence. The crafty and decep- tive manner in which the mischiefwas committed calls for no leniency in the matter of punishment .

12. In the result an award is passed finding that the action of the management in dismissing Smt.C.Sumathy from service is legal and justified and she is not entitled for anyrelief.

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazette .

handwriting of the worker in Ext.PE - 7 pay in slip for Rs.10,000 . According to him four cheques mentioned in Ext. PE6 statement ofaccount ofSmt . Santha Remanan were passed by him for payment but they were posted by the worker and entrusted to him for passing. Believing her being a staff member and since the amounts were to be paid to the worker he had passed the cheques . PW3 is Branch Manager. He has also supported the charges . PW2 is cashier in charge . According to him the payments of four cheques mentioned in Ext. PE8 were made by him. Out of them amounts of three cheques were given to the worker. The three cheques were signed on their reverse side by Sri .Remanan, the brother of worker's husband and therefore without further getting the signature of the worker the amounts were disbursed to her . He also says that Ext.PE 1. and 2 letters were given to the Branch Manager voluntarily by the worker and he is a witness to Ext.PE-2 . These documents and oral testimony of PWs . 1 to 3 are sufficient to prove the allegations against the worker . Therefore it is not correct to say that the conclusions are drawn by the Enquiry Officer merely on the basis of the admission of guilt of the worker. The very fact of returning unused cheque leaves clinches the issue regarding unauthorised possession of a cheque book. Some of thecheque leaves were utilised for forging the signature of Smt . Santha Remanan, presenting them in bank and realising the amounts.

Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typedby her, corrected and passed by me on this the 23rd day of January, 2009.

P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer

Appendix

Nil

Witness for the Workman

Witness for the Management

M. Mohamed Gowth

MWI - 1-7-2004

Exhibit for the Workman : Nil

Exhibit for the Management M1 - Copy ofEnquiry File .

नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 590.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मिनरल एक्सप्लोरेशन कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या-सीजीआईटी/एनजीपी/92/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-02-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-29011/12/92- आई आर (एम ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी 10. One ofthe main contentions of the worker is that atthe relevant time of alleged transactions and even prior to that she was suffering from mental illness (Manic Depressive Psychosis ) . To substantiate the contention she has produced Exts.DE1 to 4. Ext . DE I is a medical certificate issued on 06-04-2000 by Dr. R. Balakrishnan, Psychiatrist (Retired) certifying that the worker was under treatment from 03-01-1999 for Manic Depressive Psycho- siswith anxiety overlay. Ext . D E2 is prescription ofDr. K. I. Santhakumari , Medical College Hospital , Thiruvananthapuramdt . 20-05-1999 for headache . Ext.DE3 is prescription by Dr.S.Madhusudanan, Medical College Hospital , Thiruvananthapuram on different dates from 24-05-1999. It contains only prescriptions of certain medi- cines without mentioning the illness . Ext.DE4 is a prescrip- tion of Dr.T.K.Sathees Chandran, Quilon . It also contains only prescription . Admittedly the worker had not informed the bank about her illness or treatment at anytime prior to the disciplinary proceedings . For execution of the alleged acts the presence of mind, alertness , diligence and shrewd- ness are necessary. A person afflicted by mental illness may not be able to do such things . Amounts were debited in the accounts of different customers fraudulently, interest accrued in different accounts were transferred to some other accounts and then pooled together and put it in the account of Smt . Santha Remanan and thereafter the amounts were withdrawn by the worker . It is a cunning cheating the account holders . It requires presence way

695 G1/ 09-17 1106

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2009 S.O. 590. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.CGIT/ NGP/92/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure, inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Mineral Exploration Corporation Ltd. , and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-02-2009 .

[No. L -29011/ 12/92 - IR (M) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI A. N. YADAV PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM -LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR.

Date: 14-01-2009 Case No. CGIT/NGP/92/2003 ,

Petitioner The General Secretary , Mineral Exploration Corporation Employees Union ( affiliated to AITUC, Seminary Hills, Nagpur -440006 .

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ⅱ ) ] Gayee and 63 others ( as per Annexure ' B ' attached ) as the legal heirs/dependants of the deceased employees on com- passionate ground is justified? If yes , to what relief are they entitle to and from what date?

Consequent up on the establishment of this tribunal atNagpur , the present Reference registered on transfer as No. 92/2003 , earlier was referred and registered as refer- ence No. 11 of 1993 at the C.G.I.T. Jabalpur . In response to the notices of this tribunal the parties appeared and filed their respective statements of claims .

.....Party No.1

Versus

Respondent The Chairman- cum-Managing Director , Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited, Seminary Hills , Nagpur-440006 . Nagpur- 440001.

2. I heard the counsels of the parties perused the papers . In the very beginning of the judgment I would like to point out that at present all the contingent workers are undisputedly retrenched by paying compensation to them as per rules. Now none of the petitioner from the list Ex. 39, is working. Mr. Awsthi learned Advocate for the Union has tried to show as to how the retrenchment is void, but entire claim petition is silent about it . The scheduled i.c. order ofthe Ministry (Reference) is also not directing to investigate the legality of the retrenchment . Thus the is- sue of the retrenchment is neither raised nor directed to be considered therefore it is not under consideration at all and the submissions of Mr. Awsthi on this point cannot be considered. Consequently it follows that the regulariza- tion up to the date of retrenchment will have to be consid- ered in light of directions given by Hon . S. C.

Party No.2

AWARD

[Dated: 14th January, 2009 ]

The Central Government after satisfying the exist- ence ofdisputes between The Secretary, Mineral Explora- tion Corporation Employees Union (affiliated to AITUC) , Seminary Hills , Nagpur, Party No. 1 and The Chairman -cum- Managing Director , Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited , Seminary Hills , Nagpur Party No.2 referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its Letter No. L-2901 1/ 12/92 - IR( Misc .) Dt. 07-01-1993 under clause (d) ofsub Section ( 1 ) and sub Section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) with the following schedule :-

( A ) Whether the action of the management of Mineral Exploration Corporation Ltd. , Nagpur in not regulariz- ing the services of S / Shri A.K. Janson and 2144 others ( as per Annexure ' A' attached) and depriving them from all fringe benefits like permanent workmen is justified? If not,to what reliefthe concern workmen are entitled to and from what date?

AND

(B)Whether the action ofthe management ofMECL, Nagpur in not providing the employment to Smt . Surya 3. From the record particularly list of retrenched workers submitted by the management shows that every member has worked as contingent workman for the period ranging from 8 to 20 years undisputedly they have com- pleted continuous 240 days practically in each year right from their appointments . Though the management has sub- mitted that it was practice to retrench the workers on wind- ing up of the work of one place , there are so many workers who were even transferred to the new places of working which is one of the features of the regular employee . How- ever according to the management those were the perma- nent skilled employees . In short the workers who satisfy the directions given in the judgment of Hon . S.C. and prin- ciplesofthe Umadevi's case are entitled for regularization .

4. The main contentions of the union are that the respondent Mineral Exploration Corporation Ltd. (here after referred as Corporation ) carries out drilling and mining on experimental basis at various remote places in the country to see the feasibility of finding deposits of minerals to start the new mines. Though it has 90 % regular and continuous jobs requiring the regular workmen , it is employing only 40 % regular Workmen and rest employees are employed as Contingent / temporary workers . Some of the workers recruited in 1980 are still working as contingent workman . Ranging from 8 to 20 years they are continued and kept as contingent workman depriving them from the fringe benefits , such as conveyance allowance , leave facilities , loans , advances promotion etc. which amounts to unfair labour practice . They are performing the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

same duties of the regular employees but are not getting the salary at par with them which are against the principles ofequal pay for the similar work and it is discrimination betweenthe workmen which is against the principle of law and natural justice.

5. Itis contended that since the date of establishment i.e. from 1972 to 1988-89 the man power employment the management is 3500 to 8900 however the management has never exceeded the number of the regular employee more than5000. Thus it is continuing to take regular work through contingent workers for long duration which amounts to exploitation and consequently unfair labour practice . The management at the time of starting the new exploring work onthe new site locally recruits unskilled workman . The regular workmen are transferred and taken to the new place . Thus they are continuing as contingent labours for years together as alleged by the Union.

6. The issue No.2 is regarding not providing the employment to Smt. Gayee and 63 others (as per list attached as annexure B) though they are the dependant/ legal heirs ofthe deceased employees of the respondent corporation on the compassionate ground . The issue of providing employment to one the legal heirs of the deceased employees listed in annexure is under consideration from long time . It is contended that in the Apex council a policy making body had taken the decision in this regard and framed the policy to grant the employment to the next of the kin of the deceased employee. According to the union inspite of this bipartite agreement which is biding on the management is not implementing it . It is contended that the management being the public sector it has power to create new posts and therefore unavailability of the posts cannot be answer for refusing appointments . Near about 800 posts are lying vacant to accommodate listed legal heirs . Thus according to the petitioner Union the management failed to honor its commitments .

7. Finallythe petitioner union has prayed :-

(a) Regularize all the contingent workers ( as per their list of 2145 workmen as per annexure ( " A " ) in the respective posts from the effective date of their appointments and they should be given regular increments, promotions andfringe benefits etc. equivalent to the regular employees . They have claimed allowances and fringe benefits equal to the regular employees .

(b) The management be directed provide suitable employment on compassionate ground to all legal heirs to the claimants listed in annexure "B"

8. The management appeared and filed its w. s . denying the averments of the petitioner . It has contended that it executes the work on behalf of the Government of India and the assignments offered by the sister undertaking of State and Central Government. Its work is to ascertain whether the sizable deposits exists for developing the mine. Itworks in different projects located in different parts ofthe country even in the remote area. It requires two different

1107

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुनं 16, 1930

categories of the workman i.e. regular workman and contingent workman . The regular workmen are skilled, technical staff working on the various Machines and maintaining them. They are of permanent nature carry out the mineral explorations and technical activities . Another category is of contingent workmen whose appointments are of temporary nature , unskilled , having physical fitness as main qualification . They are easily available in the nearby villages of the site . They are the local person of the place where the work is being carried out. They generally perform manual labour work like digging earth and removing slit etc. and engaged purely for temporary duration . The regular employees are experienced , skilled , appointed following the recruitment rules, i.e. calling applications screening tests after constituting the committee. Interview etc. They are appointed on all India basis notifying the posts all over India. It is the terms and condition of their appointment that they are liable to be posted anywhere in India . Regular persons are sent on tour . The job specification .job description , nature ofthe work, job duties . accountability and responsibility ofthe regular employees isdifferent. On winding up the work of that area, the local persons are retrenched on paying compensation as per rules while the regular employees are transferred where the new assignment is received . On receiving new assignment atanother place the local persons from that particular area preferred for the contingent category of the labours as the corporation follows the principle of engaging son of the soil . According to the corporation this procedure is followed in respect of the contingent workers . The Government of India has permitted on many occasions to close down the projects after retrenching the contingent workman. It has also submitted that after the incorporation of sub - clause (bb) u/ s the corporations engaging contingent workman on specific contract. Thus the Management is following this practice while recruiting the both contingent as well as regular employees .

9.Further according to the corporation the petitioner Union has entered in to the agreement before C.G.IT. , Jabalpur and after settlement the consent award was passed on23rd Feb. 1980, in reference C.G.I.T./CL(R) 16.1979. It is binding on the petitioner Union as per bipartite settlement which was settled after discussions in joint bipartite committee . The settlement is still in the existence and binding on the Union . It was agreed that the union will not raise anydisputes during its existence and same is replaced byanother settlement. The instant dispute was raisedduring the operation of 3rd wage settlement . The settlement also reaffirms and recognizes that the working of the corporation entails two types of workman i.e. regular and casuals. Now in view of its participation in the settlement, the Union is estopped from raising the disputes . It is also contented that Hon. HC. of Andra Pradesh has upheld its contention that the petitioners are estopped from questioning the Award . In WritpetitionNo. 10764 and 19584/1988, the principles are applicable to the present dispute also.

1108

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 10. The management , submitting the copies of the judgments of A.P. High Court in writ petition No. 10764 and 19584 both of 1988 and Copy of the Judgment ofHon. S.C. inwrit petition No. 1129 of 1988 the writs filed by some ofthe contingent workmen , submitted that the dismissal of the above writs indicates that their regularization can not be claimed as of right .

retrospective effect from the date reference i.e. 7-1-1993 the union has challenged the award in writ petition No. 5423/1998.Both writs were decided Hon . Single Judge of H.C. allowed the writ of Corporation and dismissed the writ of the Union by a common Judgment . The Union being aggrieved preferred the appeal before Hon S.C. in civil appeal nos . 2027 and 2028 of 2000.

14. During the pendency of the above appeals Hon. S.C. issued interim directions to the corporation to provide the work to the members of the union as casual labours providedthework is available and ifthe workmen are willing to go the places where the work is available . The Constitution Bench of Hon. S. C. by its judgment dated 26- 7-06 disposed of the appeals and remanded the original claim petition to this tribunal with the certain directions as under :-

15. To decide it afresh strictly in accordance with and in compliance with all the directions given in the judgment, the Secretary of the state of Karnataka & others Vs. Umadevi (3 ) & others Reported in (2006) 4 S.C.C. particularly paragraphs No. 53 & 12 and till then the interim order dated 3-5-1991 to remain in force . There are other directions also which are asking the tribunal to scrutinize the record in regard to the genuineness and authenticity of each and every claimant for regularization who have worked for 240 days in a year . There are specific directions to consider health as to ability to work and age of each claimant i.e. as date of the superannuation, besides other guidelins ofPara No. 53 of Umadevi's case reads as follows- 11.The management having admitted that 882 casual workmen were working in Feb. 1995 has submitted that considering the nature of their work which is not similar to regular employees they can not be given the benefits and the scale of the regular workmen . According to the corporation it is facing the acute reduction of the work and looking the work order position it is required to reduce the manpower also . Further it is contended that it is facing the financial crunch and also running in loses which has forced it to resort the voluntary retirement scheme . It has retired. 888 workmen considering the work order and financial crises . The corporation is inducing the workman for voluntary retirements . The existing manpower is Surplus to the requirement and there is no scop for the regularsation . It is not able to pay their salaries . Referring the judgment of the Hon. M.P. High Court in writ petition No.1431 /86 and letter of the Ministry of Labour filed in Sitanala project has contended that each project of the corporation is temporary Industrial Establishment and on completing the work casual workman are retrenched. The hon. High Court as well as the Government has given the permission for retrenchment of the contingent workmen onwinding the work .

12. So far as the issue of appointment on compassionate ground is concern, according to the management it had formed a policy to provide the employment to one of the dependants of the diseased workman . However since it is facing financial crisis and continuous defection of the works order it is not possible to provide any employment as prayed on compassionate ground. Finely it has prayed to dismiss the claim.

13.Before proceeding to appreciate the evidence of the parties it will be very much essential to see the history in brief ofthis case as well as the specific direction of the Hon. Supreme Court . On the basis of the above pleadings , after recording evidence and hearing arguments My learned predecessor , presiding officer of this tribunal passed the Award on 24-3-1998 , directing to regularize all 2145 workman as per Annexure " A " within three months from the date ofpublication of award ( 13-4-1998 ) . It also found that they are entitled for regular pay scales increments , D.A. leave facilities The tribunal also directed to provide the employments to the dependant heirs of the deceased. employees . On compassionate ground as prayed by the Union . The corporation challenged the Award before H.С. in writ petition No. 1981/1998 and since the benefits of regularisation and others were not granted with

"One aspect needs to be clarified. There may be cases where irregular appointments ( not illegal appointments) as explained S. V. Narayanappa, R. N. Nanjundappa and B. N. Nagaranjan referred to in Para No. 15 above , ofduly qualified persons in duly sanctioned vacant posts Might have been made and employees have continued to work for ten years ormore but without intervention of the orders of the court or oftribunal . The question of regularization ofthe services ofsuch employees may have to be considered on merits in the light of the principles settled by this court in the cases referred above to and in the light of this judgment . In that context , the Union of India and State Governments and their instrumentalities should take steps to regularize, as one time measures, the services of such irregularly appointed, who have worked for ten years or more in duly sanctioned postsbut not under the cover of the orders of the court or of Tribunal and should further ensure that the regular recruitments are under taken to fill those vacant posts that requires to be filled up, in cases where temporary employees or daily wagers are being now employed. The process must be set in motion with in 6 months from this date . We also clarify that regularization , if any already made but not sub- judice, need not be reopened based on this judgment , but there should be no further by passing of the constitutional requirements and regularizing or making permanent , those notdulyappointed as per constitutional scheme . " 1109 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

16. I have gone through the evidence . The petitioner union has examined as many as 22 witnesses while the management has examined 3 witnesses . All the petitioners witnesses have repeated the same and the similar facts as mentioned in their statement of claims . The sum and substance or their evidence is that.-

(a) The corporation is continuing the workman as contingent or temporary labours , for years together.

(b) Some of them are even appointed even before 1979.

The Hon. S.C. questioned as to whether the courts can impose financial burden on the state by insisting on regularization or permanence in the employee. The court observed that the courts are not expected to impose a financial burden on the state by such directions . The union has also no where specifically prayed to reinstate the petitioners, may be because at the time raising the dispute they were not retrenched but fact remains that at present they are not in service . Since they are out of service on the retrenchment which appears to be legal and unchallenged, thequestion ofregularizing them or absorbing in permanent postand continuing them for further period does not arise . In such circumstances the submissions of the petitioner's (c) Though they are treated as temporary are transferred from one place to other places .

(d) They are paid daily wages instate of regular salary. They are not getting the regular pay scale increments and other allowances though they are working continuously for more than 10 years and even some of them from 20 years .

c 0 u n S e regarding reinstatement cannot be accepted. It will also not proper to direct the corporation and to increase the financial burden on it who practically has retrenched the workman considering the works order and financial restrained. There is no specific evidence to show that its work ofsearching the minerals or any project as part ofthe work is going on at particular place. 1 (e) They neither promoted to the higher post, nor getting the leaves benefits or other allowances though the subscription for G.P.F. is deducted from their salaries . No fringe benefits are given to them.

(f) Old temporary workmen are removed without notice and the corporation is indulging in unfair labourpractice.

Allthe above witnesses are cross - examined on behalf ofthe corporation but their evidence remained unshattered. It proves their case that they are entitled for the regularization. Similarly the witnesses examined by corporation could not deny these vital facts. In the result the evidence of the union is reliable as well as confident . It will have to be accepted.

19. Similarly it is also not the case ofthe petitioners that the corporation has appointed some other persons avoiding the retrenched workers ofthe Union . As indicated above no evidence is adduced to prove the particular place where the corporation is taking the work avoiding the petitioners engaging new other workers. It is submitted that the corporation has perennial work but it is avoiding starting the work . The submissions of the Union that the corporation is deliberately not starting the work can not be accepted. Similarly the corporation cannot be forced or directed to start the new work because it requires the financial implication . In such circumstances the corporation cannotbe directed to start the new work for providing it to the petitioners. In the result in my view the petitioners are not entitled to any relief than to direct the corporation to regularize the petitioners from the date of their appointments, fix their pay in regular cadre and pay the all fringe benefits and salary equal to the regular employees from the date of their respective appointments till the date oftheir retrenchments . They shall also be given regular increments and promotions who were eligible as per rules during the above period till retrenchment.

17. I heard the counsels of the parties perused the papers . In the very beginning of the judgment I would like to point out that at present all the contingent workers are undisputedly retrenched by paying compensation tothem as per rules . Now none ofthe petitioner from the list Ex. 39, isworking. Mr. Awsthi learned adv. for the Union has tried to show as to how the retrenchment is void, but entire claim petition is silent about it . The scheduled i.e. order of the Ministry is also not directing to investigate regarding it . Thus the issue of the retrenchment is neither raised nor directed to be considered . The submissions of Mr. Awsthi onthis point cannot be considered. Consequently it follows that the regularization up to the date of retrenchment will have to be considered in light of directions given byHon. S.C.

19. Mr. Samel the counsel for argued the corporation that the union has committed the breach of the consent AwardD/23 Feb. 1980 of C.G.I.T. Jabalpur. Undisputedly there was settlement which ultimately resulted in above award. The copy of it is on record . The Union had agreed not raise any dispute during the operation of the 3rd National wage settlement . It seems that settlement was arrived after the discussion between the management and present petitioner Union . Both were the parties to that settlement . The issue of regularization was discussed on receipt of the report of the committee constituted for the same purpose . The corporation was willing to safe guard 18. The Hon S.C. in the same case (Umadevis case ) in Para No. 17 observed that the state is controlled economic considerationand financial implications the viability ofthe department of any public employment ; or the instrumentality or of the project needs to be considered. 695 G1/ 09-18 1110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

to the regular employees from the date of their respective appointments till the date of their retrenchments within the period of four (4 ) months from the date of publication of this Award in gazette .

3. The list of2145 employee's P " 39" shall form part and parcel of this Award .

4. The claim of the 66 petitioners as per list Annexure " B " regarding the appointment on compassionate ground shall stands as rejected .

5. The list of 66 employees Annexure "B " also shali form part and parcel of this Award.

the contingent workmen as the Union was insisting to adjust them on any job , but considering the difficulty of put up by the Union that more than 50 % of the contingent workmen will not shift to the new place ofjob it was settled to resort the retrenchment ofunwilling contingent workmen. It was also agreed that all the future employment will be made for the specific work and/or for the duration of the project. The present act of the Union is certainly demand raisedduring the operation of the above Settlement Award as well as against settlement . However , as they worked continuously for 10 years or more entitled for regularization till they are retrenched. The Judgment of the Hon. Н. С. Andhra Pradesh referred in W. S. is guide line on this point.

6. All the exercise should be done within a period of4(four) months from the date of the publication ofthe award in the Gazette .

Dated: 14-1-2009

A. N. YADAV, Presiding Officer

Name

SL. No.

Dateof Appointment

S/Shri

16-02-1979

1. Rajeshwar Singh

2. S. Sharma

11-06-1979

3. A. K. Aditya

16-08-1979

4. Tikaram Mahato

08-10-1979

5. N. Mishra

11-10-1979

6. R. K. Chawla

19-10-1979

7. Md . Harun

24-10-1979

8. Jagdish Mahanto

09-11-1979 20.Now let us turn to another aspect of the dispute regarding the claim of Union for the direction to appoint 66 persons as per list Annexure B on compassionate ground since they are the next akin of the deceased Employees . It is a fact that there was settlement and the management had framed a policy to appoint one person from the akin ofthe deceasedworkman , however; according to the management it is facing financial crisis and continuous defection of the works order it is not possible to provide any employment as prayed on compassionate ground. As indicated above there is nothing on record to show that there is work and the corporation is functioning and taking the work. It undisputed fact that it has reduced the manpower and also retrenched the employees . There is nothing on record to show that management has appointed other new outside persons avoiding the legal heirs of the deceased emplo- yees . In such circumstances the corporation cannot be forced to appoint these 66 persons . In my view the prayer of66 Akins of the deceased workman will have to be rejected. I proceed to pass the following order .

9. R. N. Hazare

01-01-1980

10. K. Chatterjee

-do-

11 . S. Mandal

-do-

12. R. Mandal

-do-

13. Sadanand Singh

14. Dhaneshwar Yadav

-do-

15. Jaglal Prasad

-do-

16. Sheikh Shahid

-do-

17 . B. K. Singh

-do-

18 . Sheikh Sammu

-do-

19. Sheikh Raokari

-do-

20. Dudheswar Singh

21. Samar Bauri

-do-

22. Sheikh Mahassin

-do- Here itwould not be out of place to mention that the Uniontotal No. ofthe petitioners as 2145. The list received from the Ministry along with the reference does not have serial numbers it is not even visible as well as readable . Therefore the parties were directed to submit the readable list of names of the petitioner/workers . Accordingly the Union has submitted the list but it is as per seniority. The management without taking any pains zeroed the list ofthe union and submitted it. Both lists were tallied in the office of C.G.I.T. Nagpur , with the list received along with reference with the help of the union leader its counsel Mr. Sen who has certified about its correctness . As the list received from Ministry is illegible and not serially, the list submitted by the Union will have to form part and parcel of thisAward.

23. Sudamoy Badayakar

-do-

24. Parvesh Bauri

ORDER

-do-

25. Maksu Mahato

-do-

26 . Maheswar Sarak

-do-

27. Nepal Bauri

02-01-1980 1. The Corporation/Respondent/ party No 1 is directedto regularize the 2145 petitioners as per list Exhibit P39 , to fix their pay in regular cadre.

28 . Ravi Modak

07-01-1980

29. Varghese

08-01-1980

-do- 2. Pay them the salary of the cadre of regular employees along with the all fringe benefits equal

30. Joginder Pandit 1111

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

3 2

11-01-1980 31. N. Mahanto

13-01-80 Sailendar Singh

32.

18-1-80 33. Banamali Bera

26-01-80 34. Harbayan Singh

28-01-80 Sujay Banerjee

35.

28-1-80 S.C. Gha

36.

01-02-80 37. Bhageswar Thakur

01-02-80 38. C.S. Ram

-do- Sahadev Yadav

39.

-do- Sharoj Prasad Yadav

40.

04-02-80 J.G. Chatterjee

41.

-do- D.S. Maji

42.

12-02-80 Ajit Kr . Pathak

43.

23-02-80 Ram Bahadur

44.

01-03-80 45. Sudershan Kushwaha

-do- 46. R.N. Paul

04-03-80 Gopal Kushwaha

47.

05-03-80 Bijoy Gutle

48.

07-03-80 49. Ramkrishna Paswan

22-03-80 Dinesh Singh

50.

28-03-80 Beniprasad

51.

01-04-80 52. S.S. Chatterjee

29-03-80* 53. Puran Mahato

-do- 54. Dson Bahadur Sharma

01-04-80 55. Bindeshwar Prasad

-do- 56. Gasadhar Karmakar

-do- 57. Mubarat Ansari

-do- 58. Shankar Lal

02-04-80 59. Bhaktapada Bagh

06-04-80 60. Sukhdev Yadav

07-04-80 61. Bharat Das

-do- 62. Ram Dutar Ram

20-04-80 63. Kharpa Bahadur

24-04-80 64. Rishee Bahadur

02-05-80 65. Ruplal

03-05-80 66. Ramudil Singh

20-05-80 67. Rajkumar

-do- 68. Balsaran

02-06-80 69 . K.K. Pawar

-do- Bisanlal

70.

06-06-80 Sharam Pal

71.

10-06-80 72, P.N. Sundarlal

14-06-80 73. S.B. Wankhede

16-06-80 74. Subash Ghosh

22-06-80 75. Prayag Yadav

28-6-80 76. Kasava Prasad

1-7-80 77. Damjee

01-07-80 78. Mohanlal

01-07-80 Sahadev Rajbansi

79.

5-7-80 Suresh Samudre

80.

-do- S.K. Mahaber

81 .

16-76-80 Peetsam

82.

21-7-80 Sharkar Rana

83.

-do- Jamika Tusi

84.

22-7-80 85. B.P. Singh

-do- Sharaslal Khamaji

86.

-do- Lsksna Miya

87.

-do- Madan Podar

88.

-do- Banna Bhesa

89.

-do- Gautam Maji

90.

-do- Dholla Nesa

91.

-do- Nar Bahadur Jai Bahadur

92.

-do- Manja Paura

93.

-do- Jaggu Dhera

94.

-do- Onkar Nathu

95.

-do- Mongba Poonja

96.

-do- Amaredu Lalloo

97.

-do- Kanoji Lala

98.

-do- Imam Hussain

99.

-do- Gangadhar Ghayanshyam

100.

-do- 101. Nathu Nagji

-do- Abhas Dasgupta

102.

28-07-80 Dharam Singh

103 .

01-08-80 Ram Gopal Sharma

104.

05-08-80 K.B. Prasanna Kumaran

105.

-do- Safique

106.

11-08-80 C.V. Verghese

107.

12-08-80 Md. Ansari

108.

13-08-80 Kistu Raidan

109.

17-08-1980 Bhagwatilal Lakshmilal

110.

-do- Krishna Kana

111.

-do- Hanuman Singh

112.

-do- Bhera/ Sehja

113 .

-do- Pooja/Amja

114.

-do- Bhimal Amza

115.

26-08-80 BhimaGulla

116.

-do- Purshattam Shah

117.

-do- Kamla/Bhera

118 .

-do- Madan Singh/Babu Singh

119.

26-08-80 Teja/Amra

120.

-do- Thanar Chand Dulaji

121 .

-do- Purshattam Dhuylishwar

122.

01-09-80 Ramesh Bauri

123 .

04-09-80 Demchand

124.

24-09-80 S.K. Baxmiya

125 .

01-10-80 Tharchand/Poonjaji

126.

1112

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

1 2

3 127 . Buddhadev Oraon

01-10-80

-do- 128 . Ganesh Oraon

129 . Mahadev Oraon

-do-

-do- 130. John Toppo

131 . Lakhan Lal

-do- 132. Bishnu Bahadur

-do-

-do- 133. Narayan Mahanto

134. T.C. Thomas

6-10-80 135.

3-11-80 M.B. Anthrose

136. B.S. Faseda

3-11-80

08-11-80 137. S.Gope

11-11-8-0 138. Kurba Miya

14-11-80 139. Fatie Senapati

18-11-80 140. Iswar Singh/ S . Singh

-do- 141 . Lalu/Manji

-do- 142. Narain Singh/L. Singh

29-11-80 143. Tilumani Deep

03-12-80 144. Ramalal Gope

10-12-80 145. Z. Varghese

146. P. Sharma

19-12-80

-do- 147. Shafique Khan

148. Bhutoo Ram

-do- 149. S.N. Mishra

-do- 150. B.N. Ansari

-do- 151. Ravi Sarkar

20-12-80 152. Mannalal

01-01-81

-do- 153. Phool Singh

154. Somra Oraon

-do-

21-01-81 155. Hariprasad Mahanto

27-01-81 156. Dhun Singh

157. Barku

01-02-81 158. V.B. Shekhar

05-02-81 159. Sedilal

11-2-81 160 . D.D. Samuel

26-2-81 Panchlal

161.

01-04-81 Santosh Guha

162.

-do-

12-04-81 Rajkumar Yadav

163.

Jai Nath Rai

164.

20-4-81 165 . Surbani Mehata

-do-

25-4-81 166. Lalan Chaudhury

167. Bharat

27-4-81 168. Kashi Ram

5-5-81

13-5-81 169. Munshi Hajam

26-5-81 170. Saligram

171. Madanial

-do- 172.

-do- Lachyram

16-6-81 173. K.L. Chakraborty

01-07-81 174. Narayan Bauri

Rabi Tudu

175.

-do-

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 1 2

3 176.

01-07-81 Sibu Kr. Roy

177. C.S. Mahanto

-do- 178 . Kishna Pathak

14-7-81 179 . Devilal

01-08-81

-do- 180. Sheikh Rafique

-do- 181. A.K. Mukherjee

-do- 182. Bojiy Hait

-do- 183. R.N. Chakraborty

-do- 184. Dilip Deyasi

185 . Sunil Kr. Mondal

-do-

-do- 186. Tapan Kr . Mondal

-do- 187. Gojan Mondal

-do- 188. Lambu Maji

189. Rabilal Ghosh

01-08-1981

-do- 190. Anandmoy Ghosh

-do- 191 . Ajoy Adhikary

192. Sheikh Dhulu

-do- 193 . B.R. Mahale

03-08-81 194 . P.S. Badel

-do-

22-09-81 195. Nona/Khurji

-do- 196. Prema/Nagji

23-9-81 197. Heera Nath/ Shivnath

-do- 198. Keshulal/Nathuji

199. Sona/Kuba

-do- 200 . N.N. Paramanik

26-09-81 201. Mathi Babit

27-9-91 202. Haneef

28-9-81 203 . Udailal

5-10-81

8-10-81 204. Durga Kr . Gorai

205. Farid Ansari

17-10-81 206. Chhotu Prasad

22-10-81

-do- 207 . Baiju Prasad

208 . Saldev Rawat

01-11-1981

09-11-81 209. Gopal Chetri

210 . H.D. Ramatkar

16-11-81

20-11-81 211. Rajan Miya

212 . Dassaru

26-11-81 213 . P.K. Phukan

-do-

1-12-81 214. Chaitan Majhi

215. Panchamlal

16-12-81

18-12-81 216. Bhara Singh

217. Basir Khan

24-12-1981 218 . Udham

-do- 219 . Ramchand

26-12-81 220.

-do- Balram

221. Deveka

-do-

-do- 222. Siprakash Sippu

223. Md. Eksar Khan

01-01-82 224. Sikdeo Paswan

-do- 1113

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16 , 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 1 2

01-01-82 Sikdeo Paswan

225.

12-01-82 Gaya Rai

226.

16-01-82 Jagganath Rajak

227.

26-01-82 Aftar Sha

228.

30-01-82 Md. Zahad Imam

229.

01-02-82 Ramakant Ram

230.

-do- D.D. Sahoo

231.

-do- 232. L.H. Somkumar

-do- Chiranji Lal

233.

-do- Bhagat Lal

234.

-do- Shanti Lal

235.

-do- Fukija Sooin

236.

-do- Manshu Lal

237.

-do- K.C. Saimon

238.

-do- 237. Sumaran

-do- 239. Mohan

-do- Ganesh

240.

-do- 241. C.D. Kathane

01-02-82 242. Choten

-do- 243. Kaliram

01-02-82 244. Premlal

-do- 245. M.P. Mishra

-do- A. Appагаю

246.

02-02-82 G.J. Prasad

247.

03-02-82 Ruplal Mahato

248.

-do- G.V. Ombarkar

249 .

06-02-82 Rajendra Mistry

250.

07-02-82 Sitaram Yadav

251.

-do- Ramdas Mahato

252.

-do- N.K. Sarak

253.

13-02-82 Kisan Singh

254.

-do- Mongal Singh

255.

14-02-82 Hiram Chand

256.

15-02-82 Sudakar Banerjee

257.

19-02-82 Mongra Solin

258.

22-02-82 Alexandar PO

259.

23-2-1982 Α.Κ. Baithru

260.

26-2-1982 Kalyan Parida

261.

1-3-1982 August Mahato

262.

-do- Samar Dhihar

263.

-do- Jamaluddin Ansari

264.

3-3-1982 B.K. Pal

265.

4-3-1982 Suresh Mahato

266.

6-3-92 Arun Mishra

267.

-do- R.C. Prajapathi

268.

-do- Ranjit Sahu

269.

7-3-82 Arun Bajapathi

270.

7-3-82 Budhiya Sahu

271.

69561/09-19

3 2

9-3-82 Laxman

272.

16-3-82 Santosh Ghosh

273 .

17-3-82 S. Thakur

274.

18-3-82 S.C. Patnaik

275 .

-do- N.K. Behra

276.

-do- Damji Keoja

277.

22-3-82 A.L. Mustakin

278 .

-do- Kartika Prasad

279.

26-3-82 J.C. Ghosh

280.

27-3-82 Bharat Singh

281.

01-04-82 N.N. Majhi

282.

01-04-82 Kanupriya Roy

283.

-do- Daitry Mahato

284.

-do- Rajkumar Thakur

285.

5-4-82 Madhusudan Baxi

286.

10-4-82 Ramdev Mahato

287.

-do- Birju Mahant

288.

12-4-82 K.V. Abraham

289.

16-4-82 Lakhan Yadav

290.

-do- P. Rawat

291 .

23-4-82 292. Ganpat

26-4-82 Pratap Singh

293.

-do- 294. Bagilal

1-5-82 R.G. Rajurkar

295.

-do- K.V. Singh

296.

10-5-82 Madanlal

297.

10-5-82 Jagalal

298.

13-5-82 Sevakram

299.

-do- Hanif

300.

2-6-82 Shiva Prasad

301.

5-7-82 D.S. Belsare

302.

9-7-82 Jagdish Jha

303.

15-7-82 Sukhaji

304.

27-7-82 P.K. Mishra

305.

1-8-82 Madhulal

306.

-do- Shantiram Mondal

307.

3-8-82 Sitaram

308.

18-8-82 S.H. Mohansingh.

309.

-do- 310. Sukh Dev

29-9-82 311. Suresh Gupta

01-11-82 Krishna Mallik

312.

-do- Mahanta Chauhan

313.

2-11-82 Sudhir Panda

314.

4-11-82 Susanta Nair

315.

6-11-82 Kamal Dev

316.

6-12-82 Kanaram Meena

317.

1-1-83 Smt . Shyam Bai

318 .

7-1-83 Rama Rao S/o Vika Ram

319 .

1114

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

1 2

3 320. Hanselal

1-2-83

6-2-83 321. Kalu Singh

322. Soma Ram

7-2-83 323. Nimba Ram

17-2-83 324. Neema Ram

-do- 325 . Chunna Ram

13-3-83 326. Lala Ram

-do- 327. Jola Ram

-do-

16-3-83 328. Ganpat Singh

329. R.K. Pailkar

-do-

17-3-83 330. Vinay Kumar

25-3-83 331. Rajbeer

332. B.C. Ghosh

1-4-83

-do- 333. MagaramMaji

-do- 334. Joydev Rai

-do- 335. Jaminder Singh

336. Madhai Bauri

-do- 337. Dinu Bauri

01-04-1983

-do- 338. Haru Bhandary

339 . Puran Raut

-do- 340 . G. Karmakar

-do- 341 . Bhairav Dhikar

-do-

-do- 342. Rasamoy Bhandari

343. Sheikh Kubiruddin

-do-

-do- 344. Mohan Singh

345. G.K. Nair

6-4-83

-do- 346. Anand Kandpal

347. S.C. Sutradhar

-do-

-do- 348. K.C. Singh

349 . Shivram

18-4-83 350. Nathulal

29-4-83 351. Janat Kumar

3-5-83 352. P.C. Soni

4-3-83 353. M.R. Sethi

-do-

11-5-83 354. G.M. Kanojia

6-6-83 355. S.P. Singh

1-7-83 356. Kemp Singh S/ o Ram Singh

-do- 357. U.B. Paswan

358. Suresh Paswan

-do-

-do- 359. Suraj Das

360.

3-7-83 Chand Singh , S/ o Sawatsingh

8-7-83 361. Bhagwana

11-7-83 362. Hetu Ram , S/ o Shankar Ram

-do- 363. M.M. Kandpal

13-7-83 364. Jag Singh

365.

14-7-83 Tikamu Ram S/ o Harntodihi

15-7-83 366. Pana Ram S/ o Madhu Ram

367. R.K. Sheema

18-7-83 368 . Laxman Lal

-do-

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] 1 2

3 369.

19-7-83 Veer Singh S/ o Amar Singh

370.

-do- Shambu Lal

371 . Balwant Singh S / o Kan Singh 27-7-83 372.

-do- Gatan Khan S/ o Hedar Khan

373 .

-do- Kesara Ram S/ o Banna Ram

374.

1-8-83 Multana Ram S/ o Ganga Ram

-do- 375. Shova Ram S/o Gamdha Ram

376. Hireha Singh S/ o Kaump Singh -do- 377.

-do- Paima Ram S/ o Beena Ram

378. Hira Ram S/o Hari Ram

-do- 379 .

-do- Naina Ram S / o Nanga Ram

380. Pura Ram S/o Bala Ram

-do- 381 .

-do- Mangu Ram S/ o Sona Ram

382. Kuna Ram S/o Pema Ram

1-8-83

3-8-83 383. Jaggu Ram S/ o Sona Ram

384. Banwar Lal S/ o Kasta Ram

-do- 385.

6-8-83 Shiv Ram S/ o Arjun Ram

-do- 386. Arjun Singh S /o Damna Ram

7-8-83 387. Ram Singh S / o Khot Singh

9-8-83 388. Mangesh Singh

389 . A.K. Ghosh

12-8-83

14-8-83 390. Deep Singh S / o Heer Singh

391 .

15-8-83 B.S. Rajwat

-do-

392. Baby Singh

393 . K.N. Sharma

24-8-83

1-9-83 394. Bhajandar Roy

395.

-do-

Jama Khan S/ o Mehru Khan

-do-

396. Amba Ram S/ o Pratap Ram

-do-

397. Arjun Ram S/ o Taja Ram

398.

2-9-83 Balaram S/o Bhura Singh

399 .

-do-

Biram Ram S/ o Radhu Ram

400.

5-9-83 Babu Khan S/o O. Khan

401 .

8-9-83 Kamla Ram S/o Tra Ram

402.

13-9-83 Deepa Ram S / o Narayan Ram

403 .

14-9-83 Kisanlal S /o Tulsa Ram

15-9-83 404. Joy Singh S / o Hem Singh

405.

16-9-83 Manku Ram S/ o Ganga Ram

406. Sawala Ram S/o Amra Ram 16-9-83 407. Duli Ram

21-9-83 408. Zakir Hussain S/ o Abdul Sattar 26-9-83 409 . P.S. Shah

29-9-83

01-10-83 410. Ganpat Joshi S/ o Heera Lal

411 . Lang Khan

-do-

-do- 412. Bhaju Khan

10-10-83 413 . Arjun Ram S/ o Taga Ram

20-10-83 414. K.L. Gupta

415 . Sona Ram S/ o Bhura Ram

10-11-83 416.

20-11-83 Dedha Ram S/ o Mukna Ram 1115

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

3 .2

22-11-83 Ram Singh Mali

417.

23-11-83 Sawla Ram S /o Chanda Ram

418.

24-11-83 Punna Ram S/o Danmana Ram

419.

25-11-83 Ali Khan S / o Mehru Ram

420.

26-11-83 K.J. Phukan

421.

1-12-83 Sawai Singh S/o Bhim Singh

422.

2-12-83:

Fatu Mohd Khan S /o Kadar

423.

Khan

5-12-83 S. Singh S/o Mangal Singh

424.

-do- O.L. Giri S/o Govind Giri

425.

-do- Deena Khan S /o Suman Khan

426.

11-12-83 Govind Prahat S /o Hakan

427.

Prahat

12-12-83 Motilal Sharma

428.

14-12-83 Lalit Kishore , S/ o Raijlal

429.

15-12-83 Raju Ram 、

430.

-do- Rameshwar

431.

-do- Kishanlal Sain

432.

15-12-83 Sardara Ram

433.

16-12-83 Ram Niwas Saini

434.

19-12-83 Mula Ram

435.

20-12-83 436. Malu Singh

-do- Data Ram

437.

-do- Mahindra Singh

438.

-do- Rajendra Singh

439.

21-12-83 Prabhu Dayal

440.

-do- Girdharilal

441.

-do- Jagdish Prasad Gujra

442.

-do- Pokra Ram S/o Danmana Ram

443.

-do- Jagdish Prasad Sharma

444.

24-12-83 Ali Khan S/ o Mugrab Khan

445.

-do- 446. Ram Avtar Sharma

26-12-83 447. Birbal Ram S/o Ganesh

-do- LilaRam

458.

-do- 459. Mangi Lal

30-12-83 Satruhar Mishra

460.

-do- Ganesh Ram

461.

1-1-84 Fateh Singh

462.

-do- PrakashGurjar

463.

-do- Murang Lal Sharma

464.

-do- Manoj Kr . Bhuin

465.

2-1-84 Nabab Khan S/ o Kalka Khan

466.

-do- J.K. Parihar

467.

-do- R.K. Rawal

468.

2-1-84 Shambhu Lal Rawal

469.

-do- Prema Ram

470.

-do- Mawa Ram

471.

6-1-84 Babulal S/ o Rama Rao

472.

3 1

473. Binod Kumar Singh S/o Bhagat 6-1-84 Singh

13-1-84 Laljee Urade

474.

15-1-84 Prhlad Kagde

475.

16-1-84 Binod Kr . Sharma

476.

20-1-84 M.U. Bhatt

477.

-do- O.P. Kamal

478.

21-1-84 D.N. Singh S/ o Chandrika Singh

479.

24-1-84.

Foola Ram

480.

27-1-84 Mantu Ram

481 .

30-1-84 Pera Ram

482 .

-do- Ram Lal Rawat

483.

-do- Meeta Ram

484.

Jan. 1984 Ramjilal

485.

-do- R.P. Tiwari

486.

-do- R.K. Nair

487.

Puran Singh S/o Prabhu Singh 1-2-84 488.

-do- Ami Lal

489.

-do- Vari Ram

490.

-do- Mohan Lal Chaudhury

491.

-do- Ganesh Lal

492.

2-2-84 493. Shyam Rao Dupare

3-2-84 Niranjan Sahu

494.

-do- 495. Rajnarain

-do- Chandi Ram

496.

7-2-84 D.B. Meshram

497 .

8-2-84 Bilas Manitwar

498.

-do- Sunil Madhavi

499.

-do- Anil Derlikar

500.

9-2-84 Bharat Jambulkar

501.

11-2-84 502. Vital Takre

13-2-84 503. KU Telang

-do- Ramkant Sharma

504.

14-2-84 Gautam Bhadke

505.

16-2-84 Deorao Amrutkar

506.

-do- Bajranglal Gupta

507.

-do- Adisal

508.

-do- Shyamlal Sharma

509.

17-2-84 Ganeswar Gurumule

510.

-do- Tarachand

511 .

-do- Manoharlal

512.

-do- K.C. Saini

513 .

-do- Parbhat Gurjar

514.

-do- Guljarilal

515.

18-2-84 Shriram Sagar

516.

26-2-84 Ramesh Alone

517 .

-do- Jayaram Bahadur

518.

-do- Sukhdeo Madhavi

519.

1116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

28-2-84 520. Laxman Singh

521. Mewa Ram S/o Khuma Ram 01-03-84

-do- 522. Manoharlal Gurja

2-3-84 523. A. Gurjar

524. Ramdas Kukarde

9-3-84 525.

-do- Hariram Swamy

-do- 526. Ratidas Harijan

527.

11-3-84 Baladhar Gurjar

12-3-84 528. Rajendraprasad Sarolia

-do- 529. Mohar Singh

530. R.P. Sarolia

-do-

-do- 531. Roop Chand

532. Ramesh Dhakate

20-3-84 533.

-do- Madan Giri S/o Govind Giri

534. Jitendra Kumar

21-3-84

-do- 535. O.P. Naik

-do- 536. ShriramGurjar

537 .

-do- Ramdev S/o Sadma Ram

538.

-do- Ram Avtar Gurjar

539. D.S. Basera

-do-

-do- 540. Sugam Singh

541. Anil Kr . Tiwari

-do- 542. Prakash Chand

22-3-84

23-3-84 543. Kungumun I

544. Mahin Khan

26-3-84

-do- 545. Gopal Mahapatra

546. Meeta Ram

25-04-84 547 . Bharat Mishra

-do- 548. B. Pathak

-do- 549. Saka Ram

-do- 550. Amra ram

-do- 551 . Sona Ram

-do- 552. Dharma Ram

-do- 553. Khema Ram

-do-

-do- 554. Rajendra Sahay

555. Punna Ram

-do-

30-04-84 556. Babulal Gurjar

557. Malab Patil

26-05-84 558. Md. Alam

01-06-84

-do- 559. Chhaju Ram

560 . Sunildhar Khanduri

14-06-84

-do- 561 . R.S. Pandey

23-06-84 562. Ramesh Magarde

01-07-84 563. Gorhha Ram S/ o Joginal

564. Sobha Ram

16-07-84

01-08-84 565. Pharing Bhandary

03-08-84 566. Vijay Khobragade

-do- 567. Abram Mathew

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] I

3 568. Chandi Bhandari

04-08-84 569. U.K. Chaudhary

17-08-84 570. Rameshwar Lal

22-08-84 571 .

24-08-84 Pagat Gope

572. Wasudeo Ramtake

30-08-84

-do- 573. Bhojraj Nandeshwar

574. Ranjit Bhandari

Aug. 1984 575. Rameshwar Prasad

04-09-84 576. Saku Zuddin

06-09-84 577. Kishan Sahoo

26-09-84

-do- 578. Nilkant Dongare

579. Sumrat Lal

-do- 580. Jatas Meshram

01-10-84 581 . Abdul Latif

-do- 582.

-do- Ashok Dahuwale

-do-

583. Madan Singh S/ o Shiv Singh

-do-

584. Bhanwarlal S/o Jaraji

585 . Nathu Lal S/o Bisdi Chand 01-10-84 586. Udu Ram S /o Ghisa Ram

-do-

587. Ugma Ram

588 .

-do-

M.P. Sharma S/o . B. Sharma

589 .

-do-

Chatra Ram S / o . Shankar Lal

590.

22-10-84 Balu Singh S / o . Bhanwar

Singh

25-10-84 591. Gobardhan Majhi

592. B.S. Aswal

-do-

593 . S.D. Boarkar

26-10-84 594. Maubi Bawne

-do-

595. Purushottam Sirpute

596 . Banda Chalak

-do-

597. Bhaskar Chadse

29-10-84 598 . Kartik Bauri

01-11-84

05-11-84 599. Manohar Tijare

08-11-84 600. Bandhu Bhujade

09-11-84 601. Baban pandey

602. Ambadas Chawre

13-11-84 603 . Subhash Gude

-do-

604. N. Mohanan Nair

14-11-84

01-12-84 605. Raju Sambhiaiah

606. Ramu Bauri

-do-

06-12-84 607. Jaibeer Singh S/ o . Amilal

608. Baljeet Singh S / o . Daya Chand 07-12-84 609. Jaibeer Singh S/ o. Manti Singh 10-12084

-do-

610. Sher Singh S / o . Chinna Ram

611.

12-12-84 Gupteswar pandey

612 . L. K. Sinha

19-12-84

-do-

613. B.K. Pandey S / o T.R. Pandey

614. Blkrishna kawle

21-12-84 1117

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7 , 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

3 2

22-12-84 Jagdish Prasad S/ o Bhatat

615.

Singh

-do- Rajbeer Singh S/ o Ram Chander

616.

-do- Kaptan S /o . Kashi Ram

617.

-do- Jaipal Singh

618.

-do- Raj Singh S /o Charandas Ram

619.

-do- Satya S/o Kartar Singh

620.

-do- Jeet Ram

621.

23-12-84 Kartar Singh S/ o Chunnilal

622.

25-12-84 Jaylal S /o Sadhu Ram

623.

-do- Ujagar Singh Aswal

624.

26-12-84 S. RajanathanNair

625.

-do- Rajpal Singh

626.

28-12-84, Subhash Madavi

627.

-do- Birendra Kumar

628.

-do- Suresh Singh

629.

-do- Iswar Singh S /o Shivlal

630.

31-12-84 Vinayar Nande

631.

01-01-85 Ashok Manidwar

632.

-do- Ram Sarup

633.

-do- Sri Ram Swamy

634.

-do- Birbal S/o Chakka Ram

635.

-do- Bajranglal S/o Durga

636.

-do- 637. Phagwara Ram

-do- Bhagwan Singh

638.

-do- Shankar Lal

639.

-do- Laxman Singh

640.

-do- Chhaju Ram

641.

-do- Navrang Lal

642.

-do- Ramesh Parik

643.

-do- Kailash Chand

644,

-do- M. Singh

645.

-do- Sonud Ram

646.

-do- Hanuman Ram

647.

-do- Suraj Ram

648.

-do- Chittar Singh

649.

-do- Ashok Kr . Sharma

650.

-do- Ramavtar Gurjar

651.

-do- Bhagwan Ram

652.

-do- Bhaskar Pathak

653.

-do- S. Mondal

654.

02-01-85 Pratap Singh

655:

04-01-85 Iswar Ganfare

656.

-do- Wasudeo Nimje

657.

-do- Sudhakar Damre

658.

-do- Umesh Madavi

659.

07-01-85 Rambhan Garad

660.

-do- R.C. Hanumante

661.

07-01-85 Sadhu Mathe

662.

695G1/09-20

3 1 2

07-01-85 Mohan Hedau

663.

-do- Vylas Wahde

664.

-do- Bandhu Meshram

665.

-do- Niwruti Sartupe

666.

08-01-85 Bhola Sripat

667.

09-01-85 Md. Ghazi

668.

12-01-85 Prem Singh

669.

-do- Rajendra Singh S/ o Prabhu Ram

670.

-do- Raj Singh Tank

671 .

-do- Udaibeer Singh

672.

14-01-85 Rajkumar Durga

673.

-do- Sanjay Kawke

674.

-do- PramodAlmosta

675.

-do- P.P. Paul

676.

15-01-85 Charandas Meshram

677.

-do- 678. Bhagat Singh

16-01-85 Tirturam Meshram

679.

-do- Subhash Chand

680.

17-01-85 Devidas Patwar

681 .

-do- 682. Bilas Pakruwar

18-01-85 John Mathew

683 .

-do- 684. N.I. John

-do- Bandu Binwar

685.

-do- Mangtu Ram

686.

-do- Subhash Chand

687.

19-01-85 A.K. Pathak

688 .

24-01-85 Jhabar Mal

689.

25-01-85 Ramavtar Yadav

690.

01-02-85 Khamam Singh S /o Bhim Singh

691.

-do- Mohan Yadav

692.

-do- K.C. Bauri

693.

-do- M.K. Singh

694.

-do- Imaque Ansari

695.

-do- Gopal Mahanto

696.

06-02-85 Manu Ram

697.

08-02-85 Prem Kumar S/o Phool Chand

698.

11-02-85 Ramedh Kumar S/o Suret Singh

699.

11-02-85 Ruttan Singh S/ o Bhagwan

700.

Singh

Ramphal Singh S/o Nihal Singh -do- 701.

-do- Manoranjan Mukherjee S/o

702.

A.K. Mukherjee

12-02-85 D.V. Bhowari

703.

15-02-85 Ramphal S/o Manhool Singh

704.

16-02-85 Kessa Ram S/o Lachha Ram

705.

-do- Jetha Ram S /o Sawai Singh

706.

-do- Saithan Singh S/o Deep Singh

707.

-do- 708. Purushotam Singh S/o Govind Giri 1118

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

3 709 . Uka Ram S/o Pila Ram

16-02-85

-do- 710. Vira Ram S / o Purkha Ram

-do- 711. Swaroop Chand S/ o Ramjee

17-02-85 712. Sona Ram S/ o Dimjra Ram

713.

-do- Champa Ram S/ o Deben Singh

-do- 714. Chattu Singh S/ o Ram Singh

18-02-85 715. Chtha Ram S/ o Pachha Ram

-do- 716. Tulsa Ram S/ o Bhola Ram

-do- 717. Taga Ram S/ o Moola Ram

-do- 718 . Shambu Ram S/ o Bhika Ram

20-02-85 719. Vinod Kr . Yadav S/ o R.S. Yadav

21-02-85 720. Babulal S/ o Jana Ram

24-02-85 721. Mohan Majhi

722 . P.R. Inchalwar

25-02-85 723 . Sidharth Umre

26-02-85 724. M. Bhowmik S/ o H.N. Bhowmik 01-03-85

-do- 725. RamGurjar

-do- 726. Mohar Singh

727. Krishna Kumar

04-03-85

12-03-85 728. Kishan Kumar , Amilal

729. Bhagwan Das S/ o Ram Niwas -do- 730. Rajseer Singh S/o Ratan Singh -do- 731. Ombu Singh S/ o Prabhu Singh -do- 732. Rana Ram S/ o Amra Ram

14-03-85

16-03-85 733. Chhattar Singh

734. Kailash Sharma S/ o P.L.

18-03-85 Sharma

19-03-85 735. Dilip Rauth

20-03-85 736. Jaibeer Singh S/ o Amilal

23-03-85 737. Deep Singh S/ o Lal Singh

26-03-85 738. Damodar Pipashande

Pratap Singh S / o Dhanna Ram 29-03-85 739.

740. Kishor Bhale

31-03-85

-do- Kallu Majhee

741.

01-04-85 742. Omprakash S/ o Banwari

Κ.Α. Pillai

-do- 743.

-do- 744. G. Ranganathan

-do- 745. P. Krishnamurthy

-do- 746. M. Arummugan

-do- 747. V. Sambundam

-do- 748. K. Rajenderan

-do- 749. N. Velayudhan .

-do- 750. K. Kalia Perumal

-do- 751. Ragavlil

-do- 752. V. Sundaresan

-do- 753. V.M. Vasudevan

-do- 754. Μ.Ν. Nathan

-do- 755. V. Ramchandran

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1

3 756. Birbal Ram

01-04-85

-do- 757. Mali Ram

-do- 758. M.S. Negi

759 . Suresh Kr . Sharma

-do-

-do- 760. Kishan Lal Gurjar

-do- 761 . Bajranglal Harijan

762 .

-do- Babulal Saini

763 . Babu Ram

-do- 764. Shiv Pal

-do-

-do- 765. Uttam Patak

-do- 766. Basant Bera

767,

-do- Shiv Yadav

-do- 768 . Ratan Kumar

24-04-85 769 . P.D. Vijayware

01-05-85 770. Hindu Singh S / o Roop Singh

-do- 771 . Gama Ram S/ o Upa Ram

02-05-85 772. Askar Khan S/ o Rashem

Khan

-do-

773. Sashi Nath Jha S / o G. Jha

774. Anil Bakshi

-do-

-do- 775. R.N. Kashyap

776.

06-05-85 N.K. Jain S/ o Sal Chand Jain

S.B. Naidu

-do- 777.

16-05-85 778 . Om Prakash S/ o Ram Niwas

20-05-85 779. Bhim Singh S/ o Bharat Singh

-do-

780. Bishan Kumar Sio Mala Ram

-do- 781 . Raghubir Singh S/o Munshi Ram

-do- 782 . Jaibeer Singh S/ o Man Singh

783 . Krishan Singh S/o Gaje Singh 21-05-85

29-05-85 784. Ganesh Ram S/ o Deva Ram

785 . M.R. Kulkarni

01-06-85

-do- 786. Kashinath Nayak

-do- 787. Patal Mahanto S / o Rupal Mahanto

03-06-85 788. Satpal S/o Prabhu Ram

-do- 789. Deo Raj S / o Pooran Singh

-do- 790. Rajendra Prasad S/ o Devraj

-do- 791. Pyarelal S/ o . Pharuka Ram

792. Mahabir Singh S / o Ramu Ram -do-

-do- 793 . Bani Singh S / o H. Singh

13-6-85 794. James Oomen

795. Tusir Ali

16-06-85

22-06-85 796. Utpal Samanta

26-06-85 797 . Puran Singh

798 . V.K. Rafalwar

27-6-85 799. Lalla Ram S/ o Ram Chandaran 01-07-85 800. Prakash Chand S/ o B. Ram

-do-

-do- 801. M. Raja Sab 1119

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 2

01-07-85 B. Kallappa

802.

-do- Nurgappa

803.

-do- Ayyalappa

804.

-do- Gadappa

805.

02-07-85 Giriraj Prasad

806.

03-07-85 Bhagwana Ram

807.

-do- Nand Kishore

808.

-do- Padam Dan

809.

-do- Shambhu Nath Prasad

810.

-do- Chandra Singh

811.

-do- Ashok Patel

812.

04-07-85 Shivder Singh

813.

06-07-85 C. Eaгappa

814.

08-07-85 Jagdish Prasad

815.

-do- Hakim Khan

816.

-do- Laxmi Narayan Baghole

817.

09-07-85 Ghashi Ram

818.

-do- Pameshwar Lal

819.

-do- Gheternal Sharma

820.

-do- R.L. Sharma

821.

10-07-85 Mohinder Kumar S/o . Neki Ram

822.

10-07-85 Banwari Lal

823.

-do- Hanuman Ram

824 .

-do- Rarnji Lal

825.

-do- Nokhta Ram S/ o . Kishori Lal

826.

11-07-85 Rajbeer Singh

827.

-do- Danna Ram

828.

-do- Bannu Ram

829.

-do- Nemai Dutta

830.

12-07-85 Babu Lal

831.

13-07-85 Bajrang Singh

832.

15-07-85 Ram Niwas S/ o . Tirkha Ram

833.

Harpal Singh S/o . Munshi Ram -do- 834.

17-07-85 Rayappa

835.

22-07-85 Madukapра

836.

-do- Y. Hanumantha

837.

01-08-85 Banshilal S / p . Bherula )

838.

-do- Haru Ram Choudhury

839.

-do- Bhagirath Prasad

840.

-do- Bhanwarlal Saini

841.

-do- Ramkaran Mina

842.

-do- Ismail Khan

843.

-do- 844. Khadu Khan

-do- 845. Akhey Singh

-do- 846. Khet Singh

-do- R.S. Nasula

847.

-do- Valsalan K.V.

848 .

-do- Md . Anul

849.

-do- Gajanand Ramteke

850.

3 2

01-08-85 Ajub Singh

851 .

-do- Kamla Prasad

852.

02-08-85 Nanag Ram Meena

853.

-do- Sita Ram Sadh

854.

-do- Y.S. Bhati

855 .

03-08-85 Bajranglal Bhatt

856.

-do- Sugna Ram

857.

04-08-85 Mala Ram

858 .

-do- Mohan

859.

-do- Naru Ram

860.

-do- Prabhu Ram

861.

-do- Tara Chand

862.

05-08-85 Mahabir Prasad

863.

-do- Ganga Singh

864.

06-08-85 B.N. Sharma

865 .

10-08-85 Rameshwar Lal S /o . Mool

866.

Chand

-do- Jai Singh S/o . Keshori Bagh

867.

-do- Shiv Shankar Prasad

868 .

-do- Sasanappa

869.

11-08-85 Ram Das Kewat S/o . H. Kewat

870.

-do- R. Bandi Niwas

871 .

12-08-85 Dhana Lat

872.

-do- Dhanna Ram

873 .

13-08-85 Mangu Ram

874.

14-08-85 Ratan Singh S/o . H. Singh

875.

15-08-85 Ganesh Prasad

876.

16-08085 Brahamanand

877.

18-08-85 Sukh Dev S/o . Gopi Lal

878.

20-08-85 Dalla Ram S /o . Jivajee

879.

-do- Emanappa

880.

22-08-85 Ratan Lal

881.

-do- Jamal Khan

882.

23-08-85 Mohan Lal

883 .

30-08-85 K. Hanumanthri

884.

-do- Hela Bauri

885.

01-09-85 A. Kelia Perunal

886.

-do- K. Narayan Swamy

887.

01-09-85 V. Palanival

888.

-do- N. Krishna Murthy

889.

-do- T. Murugan/Thambai Pillai

890.

-do- T. Kumar

891 .

-do- A. Palanavel

892.

-do- P. Selvraj

893.

-do- Kumar K.

894.

-do- K. Rajaram

895.

02-09-85 R.P. Nehetiya

896.

-do- Shambu Dayal

897.

-do- Nanaga Ram

898.

1120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

1 2

02-09-85 899. R. Basappa

-do- 900. Shivappa/ Hanumant

09-09-85 901. Bhopal Chetri

902. A. Mani

-do- 903. G. Sahithivel

-do- 904. K. Elawarasan

09-09-85

-do- 905. A.M. Mallikarjun

10-09-85 906. Chandar Singh

-do- 907. Rajendar Singh

-do- 908. Seenappa/Gundeappa

909. Ramkaran Mina

15-09-85

-do- 910. Laxminarayan Bhathi

911.

22-09-85 Shyam Lal

912. P. Hussain Sab

-do- 913. Mallaiah/Mudi Basariah

24-09-85

-do- 914. B. Siddappa

-do- 915. T. Siddappa

-do- 916. N. Hanumantha

27-09-85 917. D.S. Arivalagan

-do- 918. K. Rammurthy

919. Madan Lal

30-09-85 920. H. Kassim Sab

01-10-85

-do- 921. Shivageneарра

-do- 922. Narayan Das

923. Mohan Lal

-do- 924. Md. Ali

-do- 925. P.N. Jena

-do-

06-10-85 926. Karasthalappa

927. S. Ravichandaran

09-10-85

-do- 928. Varghese John

18-10-85 929. P. Pemamuthy

930.

19-10-85 B.V. Ramanajee

21-10-85 931. Smt . Ragawathi Ranawat

22-10-85 932. S. Thunjurajan

933 . Hariba

26-10-85 934. Nakam Khan S/o . Ridmal Singh -do- 935. M. Ubaide

-do-

01-11-85 936. S. Mudhuligam

937. R. Ganesan

-do-

-do- 938. G. Dhanapal

-do- 939. D.R. Ramalingam

-do- 940. G. Ambalgam

-do- 941. T. Dhanpal

-do- 942. T. Murugan/Thankraj

-do- 943. Mohan Gope

944. Kumar Sankar

-do- 945. Ramotar S/ o . Bhala Ram

04-11-85 946. Amba Bhandari

-do-

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)] 2

04-11-85 947. Md . Monger

11-11-85 948. S. Kanupian

-do- 949. T. Govindraj

14-11-85 950. Chendappa

-do- 951. Devaraja/Thimmappa

952.

17-11-85 Amanta Singh

953.

20-11-85 Navad Khan S/o . Meer Khan

954.

-do- Jamin Khan S/o . Sadik Khan

955.

-do- Satten KK S/ o . Krishna Nair

24-11-85 956. Sher Singh S /o . Mool Singh

957. C. Mahanto S/o . G. Mahanto -do-

-do- 958. Ganga Ram

-do- 959: Kukku Ram S /o . Bheru Lal

29-11-85 960. Jagdish Singh S/ o . R. Singh

01-12-85 961. Nabu Lal S/ o . Ganga Ram

-do- 962. Kishan Singh

-do- 963. Amarappa/Piddappa

-do-

964. P.C. Majhi

965. Nandlal Patra

-do- 966. Manu Ghosh

-do- 967. Sridhar Ghosh

-do-

968. Santosh Kr . Mondal

-do-

969 . Kanchan Ghosh

-do-

970. S.K. Lakhu

-do-

971 . H. Ram S/ o . Ishra Ram

02-12-85 972. P. J. Shorte S /o . J. Shorte

-do-

973 . Hussain Sab

-do-

974. Sabyali Sab

-do-

975. B. Amarappa

-do-

976. Anthonappa

977. Moulu Sab

-do-

978. Ramappa/Durgappa

-do-

979. Marippa/Durgappa

980. Amaragaoda

-do-

981. H. Bandiniwas

-do-

982.

-do-

Puran Mahanto

03-12-85 983. G. Seenappa/Gavindappa

-do-

984. Nagappa

-do-

985. B. Errappa

-do-

986. Burmappa

-do-

987. Mariappa

988 .

-do-

Ganesh Ghosh

989 . Anath Ghosh

04-12-85

-do-

990. Chinmoy Sutradhar

05-12-85 991. Ujjal Mondal

992. Basak Ghosh

-do-

993 . Bhanilal Ghosal

-do-

994. Sudershan Ghosh

-do- 1121

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1 2

05-12-85 Sisir Ghosh

995.

-do- Pinu Mondal

996.

-do- Adhirath Nayak

997.

-do- Nirath Ghosh

998.

10-12-85 Mool Chand s /o . Deepa Ram

999.

13-12-85 H.S. Negi

1000.

14-12-85 Mokul Ram

1001

15-12-85 M. Mudiarauen

1002.

16-12-85 Jacob Philipose

1003.

20-12-85 Narayan Gurjar

1004.

21-12-85 P. M. Arivalgan

1005.

-do- V. J. Ramakrishna Raju

1006.

-do- Smt . N. Baghya Rekha

1007.

-do- Uttam Kr . Mondal

1008.

24-12-85 Narasappa

1009.

01-01-86 Nathu Singh

1010.

-do- C. Karthikayan

1011.

-do- Sujit Bhattacharjee

1012.

-do- T. Lingamaiah

1013.

-do- 1014. B.P. Bhandary

-do- Gangadhar Ghosh

1015.

-do- Ram Raj Deb

1016.

-do- Janthu Kr . Pathak

1017.

04-01-86 S. K. Dohariya

1018.

06-01-86 S. Kr . Gayan

1019.

08-01-86 K. Sangappa

1020.

09-01-86.

A.K. Thakur

1021.

13-01-86 Palle Rao

1022.

-do- D.S. Rawat

1023.

14-01-86 Dilip Kr . Pandey

1024.

16-01-86 Banwar Singh

1025.

19-01-86 Luna Ram

1026.

23-01-86 B.S. Bondde

1027.

24-01-86 G.N.Gadge

1028.

-do- B.R. Malsale

1029.

27-01-86 Purna Chatterjee

1030.

Jan. , 86 Nayon Ch . Loyak

1031.

Jan. , 86 Kishna Singh

1032.

01-02-86 Rambas

1033.

-do- Phool Singh

1034.

-do- Chotelal

1035.

-do- N.K. Thankrajan

1036.

-do- D. Vadively

1037.

-do- K. Sarkari

1038.

-do- V. Kashinathan

1039.

-do- V. Ramalingam

1040.

-do- S. Jayaman

1041.

-do- Shivappa

1042..

-do- Lingamma

1043.

695 61/09-21

3 2

01-02-86 N. Raju Sab

1044.

-do- Mallkarjun

1045.

-do- Huohhappa/ Sharanappa

1046.

-do- Nabi Sab

1047.

-do- Naresh Ch. Negi

1048.

-do- Ashok Rajput

1049.

-do- Miha Kapil

1050.

-do- Ketan Kurma

1051 .

-do- Gogen Bauri

1052.

-do- Varghese John

1053.

-do- Nathias Kundana

1054.

03-02-86 Sup Chand

1055.

04-02-86 Md. Yammnuddin

1056.

-do- Shivdayal S /o Gaju Ram

1057.

-do- P. Anandram

1058 .

-do- S. Ravindaran

1059 .

-do- P. Shilvaraju

1060.

-do- P. Rajendran

1061 .

-do- 1062. S. Rajendran

-do- Gangappa/ Senappa

1063.

5-2-86 K. Kashilingam

1064.

7-2-86 S.K. Bharde

1065.

-do- A. Gundappa

1066.

-do- S. Maneya

1067.

-do- Н. Веегарра

1068.

-do- V. Basavaraj

1069.

10-2-86 Biharilal

1070.

-do- Suresh Nayak

1071.

-do- Katappa

1072.

-do- Α.Κ. Verma

1073.

12-2-86 Pradip Roy

1074.

14-2-86 Y. Kanhan

1075 .

-do- G. Silvaraj

1076.

-do- K. Ramanujam

1077.

18-2-86 S. Prasad

1078.

19-2-86 Moses

1079.

21-2-86 Ram Kripal

1080 .

-do- Ram Prasad

1081 .

22-2-86 Hanji Lal

1082.

28-2-86 Hasirappa/Gundappa

1083.

-do- Thirupathappa

1084.

-do- Halappa

1085.

-do- Chenabasaya

1086.

-do- Ajarappa .

1087.

-do- Holeappa

1088.

Feb.'86 Parangu

1089.

-do- Narayan Gope

1090.

1-3-86 P.P. Diwakar

1091.

1122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

3 1092. K. Ambadas

01-03-86 1093. Mahaboob Sab

-do- 1094.

-do- Amarappa/Ramaiah

1095. Sangappa

-do- 1096.

-do- Silvatappa

1097. Bethappa

-do- 1098. Sevak Ram

8-3-86 1099. Beni Prasad

6-3-86

8-3-86 1100. Peti Cope

1101. Anasi Rai

8-3-86 1102. Ashish Bhandari

10-3-86 1103 . Chamra

13-3-86

-do- 1104. A. Basappa

1105. Mohan Lal S/ o Babulal

14-3-86 1106. Sudhan Sinden

23-3-86 1107 .

-do- K. Prasad S/ o R.N. Prasad

1108 . Maner Prasad

28-3-86 1109. Heeru Ram

-do- 1110. V.K. Saini

1-4-86 1111 . Dwarika Prasad

-do- 1112. T.C. Raut

3-4-86 1113.

-do- I.C. Chaudhury

1114.

-do- Rangappa

1115. H. Prasad

4-4-86 1116.

9-4-86 V. Nagarajan

1117.

-do- Banapada Ghosh

1118. Naresh Sharma

17-4-86 1119. Neednan

18-4-86 1120. Dasarath Ghosh

19-4-86 1121 . Mukesh Ch . Mahanto

-do- 1122. Ρ.Κ. Mahanto

-do- 1123.

23-4-86 Amar Singh Paul

1124. Mahabir Saw

-do- 1125 . Panchu Ram

April1986 1126. Tej Singh

-do-

-do- 1127. Mohan Singh

1128. Α.Μ. Mondal

3-5-86 1129. Ganesh Kol

4-5-86 1130. Smt . Radha Bai

5-5-86 1131.

8-5-86 Indar Singh

-do- 1132. Shyamlal Yadav

1133. Santosh Kol

11-5-86

-do- 1134. Jaggu Kol

1135. Kallu Kol

-do- 1136. Chotte Lal

-do- K. Kol

1137.

-do- 1138. Sansidhar Sahoo

12-5-86 1139.

-do- Kisab Linka

1140. Prafulla Ch . Sahoo

-do-

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] 1

3 1141 . Chaita Kol

12-5-86 1142. Premlal Kol

-do- 1143 . Munnalal Kol

-do- 1144 . Ramlal Kol

-do- 1145 . Tankdhar Sahoo

16-5-86 1146. Binod Kr . Pali

-do- 1147 .

-do- A.K. Nayak

1148 . Bison

20-5-86 1149 . Omprakash Verma

28-5-86 1150. Somnath Chakraborty

May 1986 1151 . Tekkal Turkar

1-6-86 1152 . Rammilan Verma

-do- 1153 .

-do- Bhaiyalal kol

1154 . Nathulal Yadav

-do- 1155. Jagdish Yadav

-do- 1156.

-do- Narayan Das

1157 . Mathura Prasad

-do-

1158 . Sika Bhutia

2-6-86 1159 . A.K. Jaisan

5-6-86 1160.

9-6-86 Duryodhan Parida

1161 . P.C. Sahoo

-do-

1162 . S.K. Rao

13-6-86 1163 . R.K. Pradhan

-do-

1164. Mani Singh S/ o . Missar Singh 1-7-86

-do-

1165. Joydeb Mukherjee

1166 . Amar Sai

-do-

1167. Prabhu Kol

-do-

1168. Sant Ram Kol

-do-

1169 . Baisali Kol

-do-

1170.

2-7-86 Biswajit Manna

1171. Ganpat Ram

4-7-86 1172 . C. Prasad Babu

5-7-86 1173.

8-7-86 Surkha Ram S/ o Durga Ram

1174. Rameshwar Mahanto

16-7-86 1175.

-do-

Vijay Mahanto

1176. Baiju Mahanto

-do-

1177. Amresh Singh

-do-

1178. J.P. Singh

-do-

1179. Jitendra Kr . Pathak

-do-

1180.

24-7-86 Ram Singh S/ o Rawat Singh

1181.

30-7-86 Bhagirath Singh/Asa Ram

1182 . Mansha Bouri

July 1986 1183.

1-8-86 Sheita Ram S/o Bhola Ram

1184.

-do-

Sawar Mal S / o Hemraj

1185.

5-8-86

Samar Singh S / o Ranjilal

1186.

-do-

Jai Singh S/ o Bhim Singh

1187. Sahad Ram

6-8-86 1188. Arjun Singh S/ o Manjit Singh 8-8-86 1189.

9-8-86 Ganga Ram S./o Hem Raj 1123

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 2

13-8-86 Bisen Ukey

1190.

14-8-86 1191. Naresh Chowdhury S/ o P. Chowdhury

16-8-86 K. Jiyanandan

1192.

18-8-86 1193. Khetha Ram S / o Rikmal Singh

20-8-86 1194. Kishan Lal S /o Harilal Ganju

22-8-86 1195. Manna Prasad S /o . Nathu Prasad

-do- Jamal Khan/Beta Khan

1196.

-do- 1197. Jamal Khan/Moti Khan

-do- 1198. Sadah Singh

23-8-86 1199. Suresh S/ o Kanaiyalal

26-8-86 P. Mathai

1200.

26-8-86 G. Unnikrishnan Pillai

1201.

Samar Bhandari

1202 .

Aug. 1986

1-9-86 Budhan Ram

1203.

-do- P.L. Mohad

1204 .

-do- Ramnath Rathore

1205.

-do- Bhola Prasad

1206.

-do- Munna Prasad

1207.

-do- Mohan Singh

1208.

-do- Pabanlal Mahanto

1209.

-do- Arjun Mahanto

1210.

--do- Kinkar Rai

1211.

-do- C.R. Chowdhury

1212.

4-9-86 1213 .. Mohan Mali S/o Nandaji Mali

-do- Salim Khan S /o Nawab Khan

1214.

9-9-86 Awad Bihari Singh S/ o

1215.

Tulsi Singh

10-9-86 Ayub Khan S /o Barkat Khan

1216.

12-9-86 Loppal Singh

1217.

-do- Iswar Ram

1218.

-do- Bhanwar Singh

1219.

16-9-86 Ashok Kumar

1220.

16-9-86 V.H. Chandurkar

1221.

19-9-86 Kebal Ram S/o I. Ram

1222.

20-9-86 Badri Lal S/o Heera Lal

1223.

-do- RatnaRam

1224.

24-09-86 P.C. Purohit

1225.

25-09-86 Ram Nandan

1226.

26-09-86 Hari Singh

1227.

01-10-86 Bhagwat Mondal

1228.

-do- Gopal Sharma

1229.

-do- Bhapalu Pasi

1230.

-do- Din Bandhu

1231.

-do- Adalt Mahanto

1232.

-do- Shiv Prasad Mahanto

1233.

-do- Chaska Majhi

1234.

3 2

01-10-86 Lakhiram Mahanto

1235.

-do- L.D. Sharma

1236.

03-10-86 Chakradhar Behra

1237 .

-do- Purna Ch. Khilar

1238 .

06-10-86 Anil Kr . Jha

1239.

-do- Lata Tamaney

1240.

-do- K.B. Thapa

1241 .

-do- Ram Shankar Yadav

1242.

-do- Samar Majumdar

1243.

-do- 1244. Pona Ram Barua

09-10-86 1245. Gopal Roy

11-10-86 1246. Shyam Prasad

15-10-86 1247. Radhya Shyam

20-10-86 1248. Bhagirath/Maya Ram

01-11-86 1249. Sohan Lal

-do- 1250. Mithu Singh

-do- Shyam Lal Sharma

1251 .

-do- Ganpat Lal

1252.

-do- Shivsankar Singh

1253.

-do- Babu Lal S/o . Pyare Lal

1254.

-do- Prahalad

1255 .

03-11-86 Charan Singh

1256.

07-11-86 B.K. Behera

1257.

08-11-86 Sitan Turi

1258.

10-11-86 Guman Singh

1259.

17-11-86 T. Mayaram

1260.

21-11-86 S. Prathappan

1261 .

24-11-86 K. Raman

1262 .

Nov. 1986 Nepal Kishan Sharma

1263.

-do- Sephal Chakraborty

1264 .

01-12-86 Baria Ram S/o . Sadique

1265.

-do- Roshan Lal

1266.

-do- K. Samadhan

1267.

-do- Kuwara Kol

1268.

-do- M. Samad

1269.

-do- Pyarilal Tiwari

1270.

05-12-86 Ram Avtar

1271 .

-do- Mithilesh Singh

1272:

06-12-86 Hanuman Singh

1273.

07-12-86 Nilip Singh

1274.

08-12-86 Ram Ratan

1275.

09-12-86 Ami Lal

1276.

-do- Kailash Chand

1277.

16-12-86 Bimal Bajpaye

1278.

-do- Ram Singh

1279.

22-12-86 Bhav Singh Rathore

1280.

-do- Κ.Ν.Ρ. Sinha

1281 .

25-12-86 Tulsi/Besta Ram

1282.

1124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

01-01-87 1283. Bhawar Singh

-do- 1284. Arjum

-do- 1285. R.S. Pandey

1286. Amra

-do-

-do- 1287. Ghanshyam Singh S/ o Deen

Dayal

1288. Dheera Ram/Beera Ram

-do- 1289. Purkha Ram/Dhara Ram

-do-

-do- 1290 Hari Singh/ Ram Singh

-do- 1291. Bhera Ram/Mora Ram

-do- 1292. Diganna Ram/Moola Ram

-do- 1293. Musha Khan/ Pandi Khan

-do- 1294. Kamla Ram/Bela Ram

-do- 1295. Roopa Ram/Usha Ram

1296 . Ramakant Sharma

-do- 1297 . Palit Lohar

-do-

-do- 1298. Shyam S. Vishwakarma

06-01-87 1299. Van Singh/ Jhola Singh

12-01-87 1300. Bani Kr . Ghosh

13-01-87 1301. Jetha Ram

13-01-87 1302. Bhawar Singh Sekhawat

14-01-87 1303. Kalu Singh S/o . Madan Singh

-do- 1304. Ahakka/Panajee

-do- 1305. Mahaveer Prasad/ B . Ram

15-01-87 1306. W.A. Khan

16-01-87 1307. G.M. Singh

1308. P.K. Sarkar

-do-

16-01-87 1309, Hanman Prasad

-do- 1310. Mool Singh

-do- 1311. Mool Chand

1312 . Mithulal

-do- 1313. Sunderlal

-do-

-do- 1314. Mohan Singh

1315. B. Poddar

-do-

17-01-87 1316. Gula Ram S/ o . Sewak Ram

-do- 1317. Hari Ram S/ o . Laxman Ram

-do- 1318. Ram Niwas

-do- 1319. Gyan Singh

1320 . Ramen Lal

19-01-87

-do- 1321. E. Bairagi

-do- 1322. Kuldeep Singh

-do- 1323. Bhagwan Das

20-01-87 1324. Shivaprasad

1325. .R.N . Sutar

26-01-87 1326. B. Giri

-do-

-do- 1327. M. Murmu

-do- 1328. A.K. Banerjee

-do- 1329. L. Mahapatra

-do- 1330. B.N. Singh

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii )] 1

26-01-87 1331 . Daitary Ghosh

1332.

-do- Mirza Murmu

-do- 1333 . Jagdish Mahanto

-do- 1334 . Tarapada Mahato

1335. Prasad Sudar

-do- 1336. Sahdeo Mahto

-do- 1337. Dukku Soren

-do- 1338. Omen Ram Murmu

-do-

-do- 1339. Tujhar Hansda

1340 . Sumai Murmu

-do-

-do- 1341 . Ganeshwar Gope

1342. Sukhdeo Mahto

-do- 1343 . Kantosh Jha

26-01-87 1344. Naku Baske

-do-

-do- 1345. Magut Tudu

-do- 1346. Meghrai Soren

-do- 1347. Lal Singh Murmu

-do- 1348. Janmboy Mahto

-do- 1349. Durga Naik

-do- 1350 . Dejopada Majhi

1351 . Udai Hansda

-do- 1352. Makru Mahto

-do- 1353 . J.L. Dhal

-do-

1354 . Bhoglu Soren

-do- 1355 . Madru Majhi

1356 . Mohan Mahato

-do-

29-01-87 1357 . Bhajana Ram

01-02-87 1358 . Shyam Singh Sen

-do-

1359. Raghubheer Singh

1360. A.K. Parida

-do-

1361. Roop Lal

1362 . Karan Sai

-do-

01-02-87 1363 . Agar Sai

1364 . Lalu Ho

-do-

1365 . Suresh

-do-

1366 . Shiv Charan

-do-

1367 . Pradeep Banerjee

1368 . P. Prasad

-do-

1369 . Gautam Majhi

-do-

1370. Shivbharat Singh

1371 . Sankar

-do-

1372 . Dharam Pal

-do-

1373 . Bhadur Mol

02-02-87

-do-

1374 . Ramdeo Singh

1375. Purmi Dhan S/ o Deva Ram -do-

-do-

1376. Rohitas Gurjar

1377. Amin Khan

-do-

1378. Hari Singh

-do-

1379. Jagdish Prasad Naik 1125

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 2

02-02-87 BauriRam

1380.

-do- Mali Ram

1381.

-do- J.K. Gupta

1382.

-do- Lal Mohammed

1383.

-do- Budh Ram Swamy

1384.

-do- Omprakash Rawat

1385.

03-02-87 Rajendra Chaudhury

1386.

-do- Uma Kant Basad

1387.

05-02-87 Nand Kishore Prasad S/ o.

1388.

G. Prasad

-do- Lala Ram S/o . Chama Rama

1389.

14-02-87 Amin Khan/Sadik Khan

1390.

15-02-87 Ram Lal

1391:

18-2-87 A.K. Abihatir

1392.

19-2-87 Mohan Lal/Uham Ram

1393.

-do- Ali Sher Khan/Lakha Khan

1394.

21-2-87 Toni Sharma

1395.

28-2-87 Rajendra Singh

1396.

Feb.87 Nepal Chakraborty

1397.

1-3-87 M. Nanda

1398.

-do- Tikal Enlea

1399.

1-3-87 Banat Gurjar

1400.

2-3-87 Babulal

1401.

14-3-87 Bhanwaru Deen/Abdul Gon

1402.

-do- Beekha Ram/Prahlad Ram

1403.

17-3-87- B.L. Kalwani

1404.

19-3-87 Koher Singh

1405.

27-3-87 Vijay Parik S/o. Babulal Parikh

1406.

1-4-87 Harinarayan Meena

1407.

-do- Sish Ram Gurjar

1408.

-do- Man Singh

1409.

-do- Pilatus Panna

1410 .

2-4-87 D.J. Kawale

1411.

3-4-87 G. D. Salame

1412.

6-4-87 B.H. Lokhande

1413.

7-4-87 Mitu Behara

1414.

12-4-87 Jagdish Prasad Saini

1415.

-do- Smt. Saiman Bibi

1416.

194-87 Ramjatan Das

1417.

21-4-87 Ladha Ram

1418.

1-5-87 Suresh K.B. S/o . B. Nair

1419.

-do- Surta Ram/Dama Ram

1420.

-do- Pradip Naik

1421.

-do- Shiv Sampath

1422.

5-5-87 Manoj Kumar S/o . Kanwarlal

1423.

-do- Gohul Singh S/o . Pusa Singh

1424.

Mohan Singh S/o . Amar Singh -do- 1425.

7-5-87 Prasanta Dev

1426.

11-5-87 Rajeev Sharma

1427.

695G1/09-22

3 2

17-5-87 Protap Roy

1428.

19-5-87 Prabhu Ram S/o Bista Ram

1429.

1-6-87 Budda Ram

1430.

-do- Ravi Shankar Pd/Dama Sah

1431.

-do-

Niha Singh

1432.

-do- Mahendra Pal

1433.

2-6-87 Thakara Ram/Kana Ram

1434.

5-6-87 Dibakar Das

1435.

6-6-87 Chhunni Lal

1436.

25-6-87 A.C. Sivabera S/o . R.S: Prasad

1437.

1-7-87 Bhava Ram

1438.

-do- Newa Ram

1439.

-do- Chotu Ram

1440.

-do- Bala Ram

1441.

-do- Manjana Ram

1442.

2-7-87 Tapan Roy Chowdhury

1443.

-do- Prasanta Kr. Sarkar

1444.

3-7-87 Keshra Ram/Daraj Ram

1445.

7-7-87 Nagar Khan/Pandi Khan

1446.

-do- Dharamveer

1447.

-do- Chandi Prasad

1448.

9-7-87 Noor Mohammad S /o. Majid

1449.

Khan

10-7-87 Ranjeela Ram

1450.

12-7-87 Sawar Khan

1451 .

21-7-87 Gultan Ganju

1452.

21-7-87 Balram Gautam

1453.

26-7-87 1454. Raghuman Chandey S /o . Chullan

27-7-87 Daya Lal

1455.

28-7-87 Sukhdhar Lohar S / o G. Lohar

1456.

30-7-87 Tayub Khan/S/o . Amarudeen

1457.

1-8-87 Shankar Lal S/o . B. Lal

1458 .

-do- P. Dayal S/ o Mool Chand

1459.

-do- Gautam Lal S/o Manjee

1460.

-do- Gopal Lal S/ o. Panna Jee

1461 .

-do- Madan Lal

1462.

-do- Harka Bhuniya

1463.

-do- Bhuneshwar Mahali

1464.

-do- Kashi Nath Bedla

1465.

-do- Tirathnath Prajapati

1466.

-do- Lalde Oraon

1467.

-do- H.N. Chaudhury

1468.

-do- Ramashish Prasad

1469.

-do- Sanno Oraon

1470.

-do- Khanlal Mahato

1471.

-do- C.M. Munda

1472.

-do- Jabbar Ansari

1473.

-do- Ram Kripal Vishwakarma

1474.

1126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

3 1475.

1-08-87 Johar Toppo

1476. Dhaneshwar Mahato

-do- 1477. K. Karmuli

-do- 1478.

-do- Devilal Manjhi

1479. G.S. Prasad

-do- 1480. Ramdeo Oraon

-do- 1481 . Kameshwar Jha

-do- 1482. Bhima Ram

3-8-87 1483. Smt. M. Khatoon

10-8-87 1484. Shri V. George

12-8-87 1485 . Badhan Mahato

20-8-87 1486. Paras Mahanto

-do- 1487. Shabuddin Ansari

25-8-87 1488 . Lakhan Naik

-do- 1489. Lalchand Mahato

-do- 1490. Jaglesh Kumar

1-9-87 1491. Rajendra Kumar

-do- 1492. R.S. Tiwari

4-9-87 1493.

7-9-87 Layakat Khan

1494.

-do- Bedri Pd . Dubey

1495. Jothan Ram

1-10-87 1496. Bhura Ram

-do- 1497. Dhulra Ram

-do- 1498. Naina Ram

1-10-87 1499.

-do- Mana Ram./Mortajee

1500.

3-10-87 Sishupal S/ o Kanhaiya Lal

1501. Laxman

-do- 1502. Pawa Ram

6-10-87 1503. Kalu Prasad

10-10-87 1504. Paudan

17-10-87 1505. M. Puchelu

24-10-87

-do- 1506. A. Ramamurthy

1507. Smt . K. Arundahti

27-10-87 1508.

1-11-87 Amar Chand S/o . Kanjee

1509. Puran Chatter

-do- 1510. Shivnath Bauri

-do- 1511. Mahadev Mudi

-do-

-do- 1512. Pdhik Bhuiya

1513. Dalit Bauri

-do-

-do- 1514. Swapan Kr . Mondal

1515 . Lakkiram Murmu

-do-

-do- 1516 . Roy Ranjan Kabi

-do- 1517. Swapan Kabi

1518.

-do- Kamal Kant Dey

1519.

-do- Daymey Majhi

1520. Prabhadhar Mondal

-do- 1521. Jheru Bauri

-do- 1522. Khokan Mondła

-do- 1523. Bhikari Ram

-do-

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

3 1524. Shodh Ch . Shah

1-11-87 1525. A. Paramanik

-do- 1526 . Bhkan Bauri

-do- 1527 .

-do- Soapan Modi

1528 . Fidha Hussain

-do- 1529. K. Vankaiah

11-11-87 1530. M. Ramaiah

26-11-87 1531 . PaidakułyModi

-do- 1532 . Ashok Walmiki

1-12-87 1533 . Alim Khan

-do- 1534.

-do- Potuly Kodari

1535. D. Kishan Rao

-do- 1536. A. Munay

-do- 1537.

-do- Vijay Raghu N.

1538. S.K. Jena

-do-

1539. N. Subramanyam

-do-

1540. Sreniwas

-do-

1541. Khela Murmu

-do-

1542. Haldar Singh

-do-

1543 . Damu Murmu

-do-

1544. Kishan Ho

-do-

1545.

-do-

Awashish Mistry

1546. Arjun Naik

-do-

1547.

-do-

Chaudhary Patro

1548.

-do-

Chinagu Patro

1549 . Dharmu Murmu

-do-

1550 . Ful ch . Mukhi

-do-

1551 . Gourkasi Patro

-do-

1552 . Samarath

-do-

1553 . C. Sailu

2-12-87 1554. Ganpat Singh

3-12-87 1555. Bagga Ram

4-12-87 1556. T. Radha Kishan

-do-

1557 . Brodidi Pahaiah

-do-

1558 . Naina Ram

5-12-87 1559. Balu Ram

-do-

1560 . Pona Ram

-do-

1561 . Ch . Ravider

-do-

1562.

-do-

Ravulu Ramalingam

1563 .

-do-

Indrapu Narasaiah

1564 . Karma Ram

7-12-87 1565 . Dalla Ram

-do-

1566 . Puna Ram

-do-

1567. Sewa Ram

8-12-87 1568. Burla Rajaiah

-do-

1569 . V. Sankaraiah

-do-

1570 . Ponthala Bamaiah

-do-

1571 .

-do-

Ramidi Rajasammaiah

1572. B.N. Thakur

10-12-87 1127

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 2

12-12-87 Hasidey Ram

1573.

15-12-87 Ramadi Majhi

1574.

-do- Anuu Poddu Pochaiah

1575.

-do- Danjulu Udalu

1576.

21-12-87 Purushottam Gohokar

1577.

-do- Prabhakar Waghmare

1578.

-do- Suresh Meshram

1579.

-do- Shankar Kasulkar

1580.

-do- 1581. Maroti Keram

01-01-88 1582. Mangi Lal

-do- Prahalad Ram

1583.

-do- Yogendra Singh

1584.

-do- Raja Ram

1585.

-do- Magha Ram

1586.

-do- Anda Ram

1587.

-do- Mohan Lal

1588.

-do- 1589. Kuku Ram

-do- 1590. Dasarath Hansda

-do- Nasen Mardi

1591.

-do- Shambhu Naik

1592.

-do- Arguma Hansda

1593.

-do- C.D. Soren

1594.

-do- M. Mukherjee

1595.

-do- Binod Rajak

1596.

-do- Ramai Mardi

1597.

-do- Logo Mardi

1598.

-do- Lakahan Ram.

1599 .

-do- Arbind Paswan

1600

-do- Gautam Kr. Sen

1601.

-do- Ganga Ram Mahanto

1602.

-do- Bishna Bahadur Bhakal

1603.

-do- Narayan Mahato

1604.

06-01-88 Md. Umar Khan

1605.

07-01-88 Md. Jameel

1606.

10-01-88 K. Narayana

1607.

14-01-88 Karuna Behera

1608.

16-01-88 R. Satyanarayana

1609.

-do- A. Malleshan

1610.

20-01-88 Chetan Ram

1611.

-do- R.W. Jha

1612.

23-01-88 Hira Lal

1613.

-do- Ram

1614.

24-01-88 Baharam Singh

1615.

-do- Chetehar Singh

1616.

25-01-88 Isare

1617.

-do- Jagee

1618.

26-01-88 C. Ganpati

1619.

-do- K.B. Chetri

1620.

3 2

28-01-88 Narasai

1621 .

29-01-88 K.J. Chakko

1622 .

01-02-88 K. Banaiah

1623 .

-do- Azeem Md .

1624.

-do- B. Malaiah

1625.

-do- B. Rajaiah

1626.

-do- K. Madukar

1627.

-do- Bablu Kr. Pal

1628 .

-do- Lalit Sanwal

1629.

-do- A. Handique

1630.

-do- R.N. Banshi

1631 .

-do- Karna Bahadur Chetri

1632.

-do- B.B. Chetri

1633.

-do- Nehera Lusai

1634.

-do- Prem Bahadur Leema

1635.

-do- Bhusiai Singh

1636.

-do- Damdhar Malta

1637.

-do- Dasarath Basak

1638 .

-do- Santosh Mahto

1639.

-do- Ranjit Mahto

1640.

-do- Subhash Mahato

1641 .

-do- Dasrath Murmu

1642.

-do- Domeu Baske

1643.

-do- Sasadhar Mahto

1644.

-do- Uttam Das

1645.

-do- Ram Lakhan Mahato

1646.

05-02-88 Murlidhar

1647.

-do- B. Baganaik

1648.

-do- Agnuram

1649.

-do- Vishnu

1650.

-do- Smt. SajanDevi

1651 .

6-2-88 G. Shankar Gawda

1652.

-do- Sukta Ram

1653 .

-do- Rampal

1654.

08-02-88 M. Ramchandran

1655.

11-02-88 Sankar Mahalik

1656.

12-02-88 S.N. Poddar

1657.

18-02-88 S.M. Ali

1658.

18-02-88 Jangpatty

1659.

19-02-88 Jagmohan Singh

1660.

01-03-88 T. Ramuly

1661.

-do- B. Durgaiah

1662.

-do- B. Rajaiah

1663.

-do- N. Bamiah

1664.

-do- Birbal Ghosh

1665.

-do- Dil Bhagat

1666.

-do- Keshwar Prasad

1667 .

-do- Banteshwar

1668.

1128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

3 1669 . Manihar

1-3-88 1670.

-do- Ram Roop

1671. Shiv Tandon

-do- 1672. Ram Sai

-do- 1673. Paras Ram

-do- 1674. Ram Lal

-do- 1675. Bikaram

-do- 1676. Kailash

-do- 1677. Dhanitar

-do- 1678. Bachan Lal

-do- 1679. Sewak Ram

-do- 1680. Kamtam Seniwas

07-03-88 1681. Pittala Rajaiah

20-12-87 1682. Pooni Ram

8-3-88 1683. T. Mallesh

9-3-88 1684 . Dhanaram

10-3-88 1685. Sadanand Kuldeep

17-3-88 1686. A.H. Jeelani

-do-

22-3-88 1687. Jiten Bhandary

1-4-88 1688. Pradeep Kr . Kuldeep

1689. Ram Nath

-do- 1690. Ram Sai

-do- 1691 . Rameshwar Mahanto

-do- 1692. Nand Lal

-do- 1693. Sadhu Ram

-do-

-de- 1694. Shajan Lal

-do- 1695. Birju Ram

4-4-88 1696. Jokra Singan

1-5-88 1697. B. Ragagopal Rao

1698.. Thomas John

-do- 1699. G. Chandran Nair

-do- 1700. K. Kannon

-do- 1701.

-do- K. Elangavan

-do- 1702. S. Selvaraj

1703. S. Balanxergam

-do- 1704. Elanxeran S.

-do- 1705. R.K. Jaffar

-do- 1706. Mathew T. John

-do- 1707. K. Manikam

-do- 1708. K. Premkumar

-do- 1709. Netai Ghosh

-do- 1710. Govardhan

-de- 1711. Ν.Κ. Mondal

2-5-88 1712. Hena Routh

-do- 1713. S. Sadhu

-do- 1714. Sukha Bauri

2-5-88 1715. Bharat Pani

-do- 1716. Sibu Mondal

-do- 1717. Sadhu Baouri

-do-

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

3 1718.

2-5-88 M.K. Majumdar

1719. Unkta Kania

3-5-88 1720. K. Premkumar

4-5-88 1721 .

-do- L. Ragundran

1722.

-do- K. Govindraj

1723 . R. Thanka Mathur

-do- 1724. A. Jasvanadam

5-5-88 1725 .

8-5-88 Jimka Anjaneyulu

1726. Murari

10-5-88 1727. Y. Rangareddy

11-5-88 1728 . V. Chandel

13-5-88 1729 . A.P. Shelokar

-do- 1730. R.N. Mishra

-do-

17-5-88 1731 . A.K. Singh

1732 . P.K. Radhakrishan Nair

18-5-88 1733.

21-5-88 Pradip Mukherjee

1734 .

-do-

D. Mehataiy

1735.

-do-

R.K. Chakraborty

25-5-88 1736. Mohan Kapil

1737 . M.S. Vadival

1-6-88 1738.

-do-

Monaranjan Mondal

1739. S.K. Sasmal

-do-

1740. Anil Dutta

3-6-88 1741 . Neosa Soma

4-6-88

7-6-88 1742. Bidyut Koyal

8-6-88 1743. T. Narayana

-do-

1744. B. Satanarayana

1745.

12-6-88 Mulukulo Osholy

1746. B.N. Rauth

14-6-88 1747 .

17-6-88 Dulasi Singh

1748. Chinivas Thakur

21-6-88 1749 .

-do-

A.K. Mukherjee

1750 . Bishnu Chetri

22-6-88 1751 . Murari

24-6-88 1752 .

-do-

SK. IA Saga

1753.

26-6-88 M.V. Varghese

1754. Smt . Anu Mathai

27-6-88 1755 . K.K. Shaw

29-6-88 1756. N. Ganesh

1-7-88 1757 . B.S. Rawat

-do-

1758.

-do-

Jananneth Sengui

1759 . Mukul Nayak

-do-

1760. P. Parmanik

-do-

1761. Astom Roy

-do-

1762. H. Bhandari

-do-

1763. N. Kulloriya

-do-

1764. Bidan Ch . Roy

-do-

1765. Debraj Gupta

1766 . Chote Lal

-do- 1129

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 2

7-7-88 1767. Swapan Mukherjee

-do- 1768. Sunil Bauri

-do- Pranab Mondal

1769.

-do- Subash Roy

1770.

-do- Parun Mukherjee

1771.

11-7-88 N.K. Das

1772.

16-7-88 Uttam Ghosh

1773.

18-7-88 N. Bhandari

1774.

-do- Shankar Naik

1775.

19-7-88 Tridip Ganguly

1776.

20-7-88 Johan Lal

1777.

22-7-88 Sree Kant Maity

1778.

26-7-88 Raghupati Yadav

1779.

1-8-88 Shanmugam N.M.

1780.

-do- P.N. Rajsekaran Nair

1781.

-do- Jagannath Mondal

1782.

-do- Alok Acharjee

1783.

-do- B.B. Das

1784.

-do- Sairam Das

1785.

3-8-88 Mangalandan

1786.

4-8-88 Pandev Lal

1787.

5-8-88 Manas Layak

1788.

-do- L.K. Ghosh

1789.

-do- S.C. Mondal

1790.

11-8-88 Dilip Kr. Tiwari

1791 ,

-do- Kajal Kanti Dey

1792.

12-8-88 N.N. Chakraborty

1793.

16-8-88 N.C. Badayakar

1794.

16-8-88 Madhale Mahatary

1795.

-do- Kartik Mondal

1796..

-do- L.P. Mukherjee

1797.

21-8-88 Tapan Majhi

1798.

22-8-88 P.N. Ghosh

1799.

-do- Saroj Kr. Ghosh

1800.

-do- Md. Aktar Hussain

1801.

24-8-88 H.S. Tiwari

1802.

-do- Karnal Choudhury

1803.

-do- Samir Akbar

1804.

25-8-88 P.K. Ragunathan

1805.

26-8-88 Sagar Chatterjee

1806.

27-8-88 Sukumar Ghosh

1807.

4-9-88 S. Sab

1808.

6-9-88 Giridhailal

1809.

7-9-88 Bidyut Bauri

1810.

8-9-88 Ramgopal

1811.

-do- Shambhu Singh

1812.

-do- Birdi Chand

1813.

-do- Devilal

1814.

-do- Bansilal

1815.

69561/09-23

3 2

10-9-88 Sanoslal

1816.

14-9-88 Dasanata Sahoo

1817.

-do- B.K. Pradhan

1818.

-do- Dayanidhi Sahoo

1819.

-do- Bhajamam Khilar

1820.

14-9-88 Binod Khilar

1821 .

19-9-88 Shiv Prasad Sharma

1822,

-do- Jhanaram Chetia

1823 .

20-9-88 Bijoy Kr. Jha

1824.

21-9-88 Rattan Lal

1825.

22-9-88 Mishri Lal

1826.

23-9-88 Sanjib Behury

1827.

-do- H.B. Gadatia

1828.

-do- NiranjanNaik

1829.

25-9-88 Bheru/Narayanji

1830.

26-9-88 Gautam Das

1831 .

1-10-88 Milan Dhibar

1832.

-do- Golcha B. Samal

1833 .

5-10-88 Sadhan Kaliraj

1834.

10-10-88 Kailash Chand

1835.

-do- Kuldeep Singh

1836.

-do- Mahendra Singh

1837 .

-do- Bhog Chand

1838.

-do- Ghasi Ram

1839.

-do- Panna Singh

1840.

-do- Babu Singh

1841 .

-do- Chandra Biyai Das

1842 .

21-10-88 B. Singh/Nahar Singh

1843 .

24-10-88 Moloy Sen

1844.

-do- Dharam Pal

1845.

-do- Jhanardhan

1846.

26-10-88 Soma Ram

1847.

7-11-88 Mohan Kurmi

1848.

10-11-88 Surendar Singh

1849.

-do- K.C. Mathai

1850.

11-11-88 Rambagari Ram

1851 .

-do- Bang Bahadur

1852.

-do- juglal

1853.

-do- Rupen Ram

1854.

17-11-88 Ashok Kumar

1855.

18-11-88 Kapil Kr . Singh

1856.

1-12-88 Mrinal Adhikary

1857 .

-do- Bipathtaran Bhandary

1858.

2-12-88 Gautam Jyolishi

1859.

-do- Shymal Kant Roy

1860 .

15-12-88 Mani Ram

1861 .

30-12-88 Sagi Cheriyan

1862.

1-1-89 John George

1863.

1130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 7, 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

3 1864.

1-1-89 Chunu Ram Goyalu

1865. Daliram

1-2-89 1866. Makhan Lal

-do- 1867 . Budhwanshu

-do- 1868. Suresh Saha

-do- 1869.

-do- Yathi RajuA.

1870 . Thafazud Khan

-do- 1871.

-do- A. Sengupta

1872. Bikash Majhi

-do- 1873 . Samir Mahanta

-do-

-do- 1874. B. Pandey

1875 . Badri Paswan

-do- 1876. Bhukan Mahanta

-do-

-do- 1877. Bijay Bauri

-do- 1878. H.N. Majhi

-do- 1879. Arjun Sadhu

1880 . Manohar Ghosh

-do- 188 ] . Koriken Narak

2-2-89 1882. Santu Marak

6-2-89

13-2-89 1883. A. Putaniswamy

-do- 1884. R. Thomaraj Selnam

-do- 1885. N. Setvaraj

16-2-89 1886. Madan Mohan Singh

1887 . Mohanlal Soner

20-2-89 1888. Shaila Pradhan

1-3-89

-do- 1889. Frelington

1890. Pedestan

-do-

-do- 1891. Yerless Lyngden

1892. C.P. Simon

11-3-89

-do- 1893. Venkatachary T.

16-3-89 1894. C. Sonai Murty

26-3-89 1895. Vijayrathan Singh

1896. Purushottam

1-4-89 1897. Manilal

-do-

-do- 1898. Prasad Singh

1899. Yuilson Marak

-do- 1900. Johasi Marak

-do- 1901.

-do- Ram Kumar Singh

1902 . Buduram

-do- 1903. Parsana Ram

-do- 1904.

1-5-89 Ashok Kr . Sharma

-do- 1905. Suraj Kumar Verma

1906.

-do- Sishir Kumar Ghosh

-do- 1907. Sukhen Kumar Chakraborthy

1908.

-do- Ganesh Pradhan

1909. Maithurious Marak

-do-

02-05-89 1910. Lochapathi R. Rathod

-do- 1911. Thippanna R. konapur

-do- 1912. Ningappa R. Pandi

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

3 1913 . Ashok D. Chabbi

2-5-89

-do- 1914. Hanumanthappa B. Malani

-do- 1915. Lachuppa J. Malani

-do- 1916 . Erappa B. Kanwar

-do- 1917. Shivappa Y. Devatar

-do- 1918 . Basavraju C. Gaddi

-do- 1919. Mallappa S. Jamedev

-do- 1920. Krishnappa H. Pawar

-do- 1921. Gurappa G. Lamani

1922. S. Siman

05-05-89 1923 . Y. Yalamanda

-do- 1924.

-do- Nuruyan Gop

1925 .

-do-

Devnarayan Yadav

1926.

-do-

Jopeswar Yadav

-do-

1927. Dan Singh

1928.

-do-

Divakar Kumar Singh

1929.

-do-

Naresh Banerjee

1930. Satish Bauri

-do-

1931 . Sadana Rai

-do-

1932, Sanjay Mukherjee

1933.

01-06-89 Bahadur Badyakar

-do-

1934 . Kalpu Badyakar

1935 . Mukti Bauri

-do-

1936. Terain Khusrama

-do-

1937. Suresh Singh

05-06-89 1938 . Bhawarkar Rai

-do-

1939.

01-7-89 J. Hajang

1940 . Hiranmoy Paul

01-08-89 1941 .

03-08-89 G. Satyanarayana

1942. Thomas Mathew

12-08-89

19-08-89 1943 . G. Shanmugam

1944, Pramodh Sharma

24-08-89 1945 . R.K. Zokhar Hussain

26-08-89

31-08-89 1946. S. Selvaraj

1947 .

04-09-89 Vijay Babu

21-09-89 1948. Drinly Sylman

1949 . M. Vishnukam

01-10-89 1950. B. Kotaiah

-do-

1951 . V. Rosaiah

-do-

1952. R. Shekhar Babu

-do-

1953 . N. Punnaiah

-do-

1954. P. Peddu Saidulu

-do-

1955 . V. Subha Rao

-do-

1957. K. Mennaiah/Nugaiah

1958.

-do-

V. Beemlu Nair

-do-

1959. G.V.R.V. Achary

1960. N. Puraiah

-do-

1961. D. Balaiah

-do- 1131

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7 , 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 2

01-10-89 P.R. Seshaiah

1962.

17-2-0 N. Yohan

1963.

-do- G. Das

1964.

-do- 1965. G.V. Ramamurthy

-do- Vogoulu Veeraiah

1966.

-do- Z.A. Khan

1967.

03-10-89 Kwin Hahshah

1968.

16-10-89 L.D. Shiru

1969.

26-10-89 Sagi Mathe

1970.

06-11-89 1971. T. Ganesharan

16-11-89 1972. Fakeerappa H. Lamani

-do- Balappa N. Lamani

1973.

-do- Kullappa S. Lamani

1974.

-do- Rutiyappu S. Larnani

1975.

-do- Lalappu R. Pammar

1976.

-do- Basaparaju T. Lamani

1977.

-do- Hanumanthuppua N. Lamani

1978.

-do- Humuppa D. Lamani

1979.

26-11-89 P. Kasinathan

1980.

3-12-89 K.Z. Loher/Nathuji

1981.

21-12-89 Panduppa M. Lamani

1982:

-do- Monappa M. Lamani

1983.

1-1-90 Ranjeet Singh

1984.

-do- Babu C. George

1985.

-do- B.N. Mahato

1986.

-do- D.C. Mahapatra

1987.

-do- Azim Ali

1988.

-do- D.K. Chakraborty

1989.

-do- Kashu Lal

1990.

-do- Gyan Das

1991.

-do- Kumar Singh

1992.

-do- B.N. Mahato

1993.

-do- S.S.P. Yadav

1994.

-do- Ram Singh

1995.

-do- Rajendra Prasad

1996.

-do- Ramkripal

1997.

-do- Chain Singh

1998.

-do- Kanta Prasad

1999.

-do- Ganesh Kumar

2000.

-do- Ramtan Singh

2001.

-do- Devi Singh

2002.

-do- Manhar Singh

2003.

-do- Gyan Das

2004.

-do- Ranga Lal

2005.

-do- Antu Mahanto

2006.

-do- Mahendra Singh

2007.

-do- Chain Singh

2008.

-do- Jairam Singh

2009.

-do- Kashulal

2010.

3 2

1-1-90 Ram Singh

2011.

-do- Mohit Ram

2012.

-do- Kamal Singh

2013.

-do- Bhanu Pratap Singh

2014.

-do- Narayan Singh

2015 .

-do- Devi Singh

2016.

-do- Shribhajan Singh

2017.

-do- Dharam Singh

2018.

2-1-90 Paresh Ch . Ghosh

2019.

12-1-90 Sukru

2020.

23-1-90 J.K. Joting

2021.

-do- Raj Singh

2022.

1-2-90 P. Palanna

2023 .

-do- G. Narasimhalu

2024.

-do- Siba Saraiah

2025 .

-do- D.N. Reddy

2026.

-do- Ayuk Sangma

2027.

-do- D.R.N. Maidu

2028.

-do- K. Devadanam

2029.

-do- G. Paramatmudu

2030.

-do- Siba Saraiah

2031.

-do- T. Vampalkumar

2032.

-do- 2033. Arun Sangma

-do- Ayuk Sangma

2034.

-do- Dhira Sangma

2035.

-do- Rosaddin Sangma

2036.

12-2-90 Aditya Mishra

2037.

-do- SanjayNaik

2038 .

-do- Harideo Wahane

2039 .

16-2-90 Sudhir Naik

2040.

-do- Durga Ch . Nayak

2041.

-do- P. Kr . Nayak

2042.

-do- Kundra Majhi

2043 .

-do- Gurucharan Naik

2044.

-do- Gopal Mahato

2045.

16-2-90 Shir Singh Mardi

2046.

-do- Sankar Hasda

2047.

-do- Mangal Majhi

2048.

-do- Lakhan Bagh

2049.

-do- Kundra Majhi

2050.

-do- Sultan Hasda

2051 .

-do- Patra Rajhi

2052.

-do- Tunku Mardi

2053 .

-do- Mangal Naik

2054.

-do- Ashok Tiwari

2055 .

-do- Mangal Naik

2056.

-do- Mastipati Naik

2057.

-do- Sashi Ram Naik

2058.

17-2-90 Dwarikesh Tiwari

2059.

1132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

17-2-90 2060. Raj B. Singh

2061.

24-2-90 Matka Majhi

1-3-90 2062. E. Konappa

2063. B. Pothanna

-do- 2064. D.H. Naidu

-do-

-do- 2065. N. Ramanjaneyulu

2066. G. Pothanna

-do-

-do- 2067. H. Anjaneyulu

-do- 2068. N. Naganna

-do- 2069. N. Anjanneyulu

-do- 2070. P. Naganna

-do- 2071. D. Hanumanthuyudu

-do- 2072. K. Sanjeevarayudu

-do- 2073. N. Naganna

2074. G. Narasimhulu

-do-

-do- 2075. Anki Adinarayana

-do- 2076. Y. Sanjeevudu

2077.

-do- P. Chandrasekher Raju

2078.

-do- S. Venkatasubbaiah

-do- 2079. G. Venkataramudu

-do- 2080. G. Narayanna

-do- 2081. P.K. Narayanappa

-do- 2082. Jogendra Mallah

2083. Bairamji Chand

2084. S. David

5-3-90 2085. M.K. Harinath

8-3-90 2086. U. Mohalikrishna

22-3-90 2087. E.R. Ramchandran

-do- 2088. Lal Mohan Gorai

6-4-90

1-5-90 2089. A. Raghupati

-do- 2090. R. Ashokan

2091. M. Krishnaih

2-5-90

-do- 2092. N. Venugopal Rao

3-5-90 2093. Siddalingappa V. Guddi

-do- 2094. Ramappa P. Lamani

-do- 2095. Chinnakesappa B. Vadari

-do- 2096. Devappa E. Lamani

-do- 2097. Thokurappa 1. Lamani

-do- 2098. Bheemappa R. Lamani

-do- 2099. Bheemappa R. Lamani

-do- 2100. Simyogi Channaya

-do- 2101. Basarappa P. Pundi

-do- 2102. Muthappa H. Hitalmani

-do- 2103. Devappa V. Kanpur

-do- 2104. Sellappa I. Lamani

2105. Y. Basha

10-5-90 2106 . Subhash Ch . Naik

12-5-90

21-5-90 2107. Y.Y. Bhaskar Reddy

23-5-90 2108. Swapan Kr . Naik

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

3 2109.

29-5-90 P. Rama Raju

2110.

30-6-90 Hemraj Gurjar

1-7-90 2111. K. Anjaneyulu

2112. B. Kamappa

-do- 2113 . M. Laxmiprasad

4-7-90 2114 . S. Kumar Das

11-7-90 2115 . Α.Κ. Jha

-do- 2116. Rafi Ahmed

-do- 2117. P.C. Modi

July, 1990 2118 . P. Sivajah

1-8-90

2-8-90 2119. Joby Verghese

2120. Triloknath Yadav

11-8-90

-do- 2121 . K. N. Singh

2122 . Sriloo N. Yadav

-do- 2123 . B. C. Mahanta

-do- 2124. Upendra Patra

15-8-90 2125 . Indradeo Yadav

-do- 2126. Devendra Rai

-do-

2127 . Β . Κ . Pathak

-do-

2128 . Bhaktu Rajak

2129.

18-8-90 Baldeo Singh

B. K. Das

2130.

-do-

-do- 2131 . Bhagwan Shaila

1-9-90 2132. Neelappa Hassur

-do-

2133. Gopal Bahadur

2134. Md. Safi Khan

18-9-90

22-10-90 2135 . Ravinder Kumar

2136. M.A.Ram

26-10-90

1-11-90 2137. Arun B. Singh

-do-

2138 . Harendra Singh

-do-

2139. Dinesh Kumar Singh

8-11-90 2140. Sujay Kr . Saha

21-11-90 2141 . M. Sachidanandan

2142. K. S. Anil Kumar

22-11-90 2143 .

23-11-90 Keswar Mahanta

1-12-90 2144. Rajesh Singh

-do-

2145. B. K. Mahapatra

11-12-90 2146. Surendra P. Mukherjee

5-1-91 2147 . Bajnath Yadav

12-3-91 2148. Tapus Kr . Dey

2149 . A. Brambaiah

1-4-91 2150 . N. Karan

1-5-91 2151 . D. Chinnadwai

-do-

2152. M. Babu

15-7-91 2153 . Binu Mathew

1-9-91

30-9-91 2154. C. G. Vijaykumar

-do-

2155. D. Karthikeyan

24-2-92 2156. Harisingh Sippu 1133

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

निम्न के मृतक कर्मचारियों के आश्रितों की अनुकंपा के आधार पर रोजगार मिलने हेतु रुके हुए मामलों का विवरण ।

मुख्यालय

पदनाम

मृत का नाम

संख्या

मृत्युकी तारीख

8-11-85

टिप्पणी

मृतक का सम्बंध

रोजगार मिलने हेतु आश्रितों के नाम

पत्नी तथा भाई.

के. मुख्यालय

गौतम दास

सुरक्षा गार्ड

हैदराबाद

8-12-85

अस्थाई कर्मचारी

प्रकाश हिंगल

लापता

कलकत्ता

7-7-80 3. कुमारी मीना घोष

पत्नी

श्रीमती नायोनी

भाई

श्री अशोक घोष

पत्नी

श्रीमती ई. आर्शिवाद

के. मुख्यालय

8-10-83 आर्शिवाद

रांची

2-6-82 5. लूटा मंडल

22-4-86 नागपुर 6. नरेश जांभूतकर

रांची

18-3-86 जानकी राम

9-1-87

डी. टी. -II

मनबेन्द्र घोष

19-2-85 जयपुर

अस्थाई कर्मचारी

9. मित्थूघिता

कलकत्ता

5-6-85 10. गेन्डूगोराई

2-3-87

दामाद

श्री एस. आर. मंडल

श्री चंदा राम

पुत्र

पत्नी

श्रीमती गोपाली

घोष

पत्नी

श्रीमती शामावाई घिता

Offer issued but not turned for joining श्री गोवर्धन गोराई

पुत्र

पत्नी

श्रीमती सुकती साहू

के. मुख्यालय

चपरासी

11. भवता साहू

कलकत्ता

अस्थाई कर्मचारी

शिव चरन जल

12.

2-3-87 नागपुर 13. जी. कुम्भारे

3-3-87 गौतम अलोने

14.

एम. आई. टोपो

15.

रांची

8-5-87 मोहम्द हातीक मलीक ड्राईवर

16.

8-10-83

कॅ. अटेन्डेंट

पत्नी

श्रीमती मेहरू

खातून

श्री आई. सी. चौधरी

के. मुख्यालय

17. वी. एस. चलपे

हैदराबाद

27-8-87

टी. टी. 4

के. एम. मथाई

18.

कलकत्ता

5-1-88

चपरासी

कैधर महालोक

19.

हैदराबाद

8-8-87

ड्राईवर

जोखन सिंह

20.

कलकत्ता

19-8-87 21 ..

सुरक्षा गार्ड

साधुबाउरी

23-2-85

अस्थाई कर्मचारी

22. नॉडू गोप

हैदराबाद

10-3-87 डामन महतो सुरक्षा गार्ड

23.

10-5-87 के. सी. बेतरा

24.

20-5-82

एम- ए- एच

स्वपन बाउरी

25.

69561/09-24

अस्थाई कर्मचारी के रूप में कार्यरत हैं ।

पत्नी

श्रीमती अन्नु मथाई

पुत्र

श्री एस. महालोक

पत्नी

श्रीमंती नागमनी देवी

पुत्र

श्री कित्य बाउरी

श्रीपामल गोप

पुत्र

श्री गूना राम

पत्नी

श्रीमती मालती

कलकत्ता

बेतरा

Offer issued but not joined

पत्नी

श्रीमती मलीका बाउरी

कलकत्ता

मृतक का भाई अस्थाई कर्मकार के रूप में क्रार्यरत है । 1134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009 /PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

4 26. रतन हरी

सफाई कामगार 23-1-86 27.

डी. टी. -III

गोपाल मुखर्जी

31-5-88 28. पी. धीम्माराजू

24-4-88

सुरक्षा गार्ड

29. एन. वाय. ए. जोसफ ड्राईवर

4-3-88 30. गंगा राम

एम- ए-एच

17-6-89 31. एस. एल. सैनी डी. टी. ।।

11-12-88 32. पी. एस. मीश्रा के. टी. ए-एस डी 21-10-89 33. सुदामासिंह

5-12-89

सुरक्षा गार्ड

34.

अस्थाई कर्मचारी

वी. बी. ठाकुर

21-3-90 35. जगदीश तारा

सुरक्षा गार्ड

3-5-90

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 5

रांची

श्रीमती साजन देवी

पत्नी अस्थाई

कर्मचारी के रूप में कार्यरत है

कलकत्ता

पत्नी

श्रीमती प्रनोती मुखर्जी

हैदराबाद श्री पी. चंद्रशेखर राजू पुत्र

हैदराबाद

पुत्र

श्री एन. विजय सादू

जयपुर

पत्नी

श्रीमती भूरीदेवी

श्रीमती मेवा देवी

जयपुर

पत्नी

श्री संतोष मीश्रा

नागपुर

पुत्र

कलकत्ता श्री सिताराम

पुत्र

रांची

पत्नी

श्रीमती कबिता ठाकुर

के. मुख्यालय

36.

डी. टी. ।

के. पी. साहू

26-11-89 37. एम. जी. चल्लावार मशीनिस्ट-5

13-5-90

पत्नी

श्रीमती रेवतीबाई

नागपुर

श्री प्रदीप कुमार

पुत्र

पत्नी

के. मुख्यालय

38. एन. आर. काकेरी वरिष्ठ ड्राईवर 13-6-90 39. हरीश चंद्र केडा एल. डी. सी.

7-5-89 40. वारीयाती महतो अस्थाई कर्मचारी 11-10-89 41. एन. एन. शाहा

एन-ए-एच

5-9-90 42. एस. आर. नेवारे वरिष्ट ड्राईवर

25-6-90 43. नेपाल दास

अस्थाई कर्मचारी 19-7-86 44.

डी. टी. 4

सुदीपा मजुमदार

17-8-90 45. पायडीकोंडा

ड्राईवर

4-2-90 46.

खलासी

जोसेफ तुरूक

5-11-90 श्रीमती कालूवाई

हैदराबाद

पत्नी

श्रीमती के. अनुसूया

श्रीमती तारा केडा

जयपुर.

पत्नी

रांची

पत्नी

श्रीमती सुशीला देवी

रांची

श्रीमती वीमला देवी पत्नी

श्रीमती मंदा नवार

नागपुर

पत्नी

कलकत्ता

पत्नी

श्रीमती हेनूबालाटेटी

कलकत्ता

पत्नी

श्रीमती मोइना मजुमदार

हैदराबाद श्रीमती क्रिषणावेनी पत्नी

के. मुख्यालय

47. मधू नाहा

माइनिंग मेट

22-1-91 48. अंजन नायडू ड्रिलमेन-ब्लास्टर 3-12-90 49.

स्टोर अटेंडेंट

उत्तम जांमुलकर

3-3-91 श्री सुकांत तुरूक

पुत्र

श्रीमती रीना नाहा

नागपुर

पत्नी

हैदराबाद

पुत्र

श्री रवींद्र नायडू

के. मुख्यालय

50. जॉर्ज ओमेन

अधीक्षक ( सामग्री ) 1-3-91 51.

सहायक लेखा

संत कुमार

23-289 52.

चपरासीं

वी. वी. रतनम्

23-12-90 53. एच. एस. राधोड ड्राईवर - ।।

16-5-90 54. गौतम मुर्तजा वरीष्ठ ड्राईवर 29-12-90 55. के. बी. गुरूंग ड्राईवर

23-1-91 56. सिंधा टंटी

डी. टी. ।।

19-12-90 57. ब्रीजलाल परामी डी. टी. 4

25-5-90 58.

टेक्नीशीयन 5

अबदूल वहाब

24-8-89 श्रीमती अनीता जांमुलकर पत्नी

श्रीमती लीलम्मा जॉर्ज

नागपुर

पत्नी

कलकत्ता

पत्नी

श्रीमती कमलेश कुमारी

हैदराबाद

पुत्र

श्री वी. आर. बाबू

कलकत्ता श्रीमती कारीबाई

पत्नी

कलकत्ता

श्री सनवर अली

पुत्र

नागपुर

पत्नी

श्रीमती बंस गुरूंग

श्रीमती विलता टंटी

नागपुर

पत्नी

नागपुर

पत्नी

श्रीमती सुरबाई

के. मुख्यालय

59. वी. के. पिल्लै लैब. अटेंडेंट

17-10-91 60. के. एम. श्राम वैधन अभियंता

61. बी. एम. फुलमाली ड्राईवर

30-6-91

नागपुर

62. पी. बी. शिवरामचंद्रप्पा अस्थाई कर्मचारी 6-1-91 63.

सहायक लेखा

वर्नीस मथाई

18-5-91 नागपुर

64. सूलेमान खान

28-10-91

सुरक्षा गार्ड

श्री एजाजअनवर

पुत्र

हैदराबाद श्रीमती टी. आर. बसंती पत्नी

श्री योगेश श्राम

नागपुर

पुत्र

पत्नी

श्रीमती कन फुलमाली

हैदराबाद श्रीमती हंसौदेवी

पत्नी

श्रीमती अन्नमा मथाई पत्नी

कें. मुख्यालय

65. के.. आर. कटौच

22-4-92

उप-मुख्य वेधन

नागपुर

अभियंता

66. उद्यसिंग वेलवाल सुरक्षा गार्ड

6-5-92 जयपुर

क्रम संख्या नं. 2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,12,13,14,15,22,34,40,43,62 के कर्मचारी कॉन्टीनजंट ( अस्थायी कर्मचारी ) थे ।

पत्नी

श्रीमती फिरह अखतर

श्रीमती स्वर्णा कटौच पत्नी

श्री

पुत्र

के. एस. नेगी , उप प्रबंधक ( कार्मिक एव प्रशा. ) 1135 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ 591. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन ऑयल ब्लेंडिंग लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. II , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-2/45 /2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-31011 /22/2001-आई आर ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 10th February, 2009

sheet was replied by the Second Party workman stating that, the orders given by his superiors were not part of his work and as such he was not supposed to attend the said work, ordered by his superiors . In the said reply he also pointed out that, instead of ordering same work refused by the Second Party workman , another work be allotted to him out of his usual work . However, no work was allotted to him and as such he was compelled to sit idle. The ground taken by the First Party of not attending the work and not obeying the orders of his superiors have no meaning. In fact, it was not his intention not to attend any work but on the contrary work was not provided to him as per his status and as per his duty list, hence he did not work. If at all for sitting idle if anyone has to be blamed, it is the Management who is responsible for compelling the Second Party workman to sit idle and cause and create ground of not attending the work as a result of which the enquiry is conducted by appointing Enquiry Committee . The Enquiry Committee did not conduct the enquiry by following the principles of natural justice . Besides it is case of the 2nd Party that, findings given by the Enquiry Committee are perverse as well as punishment of dismissal is shocking disproportionate which, requires to be quashed and set aside.

S.O. 591. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT-2/ 45/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Oil Blending Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-2-2009 .

[No. L-31011 /22/2001 - IR (M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

(2) The reference is sent to this Tribunal by the Under Secretary ofCentral Government, the Government of India, Ministry ofLabour, New Delhi , by its order No.L- 31011 /22/ 2001 - IR (M ) dated 2nd May, 2002 in exercise ofthe powers conferredby Clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to decide:

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO . II AT MUMBAI

Present : A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT- 2/ 45 of 2002

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Oil Blending Ltd. , Mumbai in terminating the services ofSh . H. Yunoos by way of dismissal w.e.f. 9-4-99 is legalandjustified? Ifnot , what reliefthe workman is entitled to ? "

Employers in relation to the management of IndianOil Blending LTD. ,

PirPau, Trombay,

(3) To prove the grievances Second Party filed his Statement ofClaim at Exhibit 6 .

...First Party

PostBagNo. 8803 , Mumbai -400 074

AND

Their Workman,

Shri H. Yunoos

E- 1,22 ,C-9, Sector 8, Nerul , NewMumbai ,

SecondParty

Vishwa Shanti Apartment, Mumbai -400076

APPEARANCES

Forthe Employers : M/s. Negandhi Shah & Himayatulla, Advocates

For the Workmen : Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant , Advocate

Date ofPassing the Award: 7-1-2009

AWARD PART II

(4)The claim ofthe Second Party is disputed by the 1st Partyby filing reply with its rejoinder at Exhibit 7 stating that, the Second Party Workman has admitted that, he did not work as well as did not obey the orders of his superiors . It is stated that, the work allotted to him of cleaning the drums was part of his duty as listed in para 5(a) of the WrittenStatement of First Party . It is stated that, work was provided to the Second Party workman by the First Party ofhis status and qualifications and he is responsible for not attending work . It is also stated that, the First Party is not responsible for sitting idle of the Second Party Workman. Even charges levelled against the Second Party Workman are admitted by him . He admits that, he did not work on that day . Even he admits that, he sat idle and did not work for that day. The charges of not obeying the orders of superiors and sitting idle are almost proved since admitted by him . By said he accepted the charges levelled against him. It is denied that, enquiry was not fair and proper. It is dent that, findings are perverse. It is also denied that, the punishment awarded to the Second Party, Workman is disproportionate . The charge sheet was served onSecond Party Workman and he gave acknowledgement on30thAugust, 1996. Enquiry Officer explained the charges (1) The dispute was raised by the Second Party Workman H. Yunoos stating that , he joined the First party with effect from 22nd September , 1978 as an Operator. He did his work on the same post since then. On 8th August, 1996 Charge sheet was served on him alleging that, he disobeyed the orders of his superiors. The said charge 1136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

and since admitted by the Second Party under the guise of work allotted to him or work ordered to him was not party ofhis duty list and he admits that, he refused to carry out the said work. Proper procedure was followed by appointing Enquiry Committee. Full opportunity was given to the sacked workman to represent in the enquiry . His representative was attending Enquiry Committee for Second Party Workman . He participated in the Enquiry. Cross- examined the witness ofthe First Party and lead proper and cogent evidence . By all this First Party succeed in proving the charges levelled against the Second Party Workman . When charges are proved now there is little scope for the Second Party Workman to say that , the charges are baseless and are not proved. The witnesses examinedby the First Party , by name Mr.M.G. Gharat and Mr.M.R. Shaikh , clearly establishes the charges levelled against the Second PartyWorkman and on the basis ofthe said findings and considering the cross taken by the defence representative Shri M.D. Patil who appeared for Second Party Workman , findings were given by the Enquiry Committee which has based on the evidence and on that ground he concluded that , the Second Party Workman did not obey the orders of his superiors and sat idle . Said findings were served on him . Report was submitted before competent authority. Relying on the findings , action of termination was taken by following due process of law by offering legal dues to the Second Party Workman . Now Second Party Workman cannot challenge the decision taken by the First Party on the basis of such genuine Enquiry and the findings given by it . So it is submitted that, the action taken by the First Party does not require any interference .

(5) In view of the above pleadings my Ld . Predecessor framed Issues at Exhibit 11. By passing Award Part I on 29-3-2006, I decided the issue of fairness of the enquiry and perversity of the findings of the Enquiry Committee observing enquiry was fair and proper and findings were not perverse .

(6) Now, following issues are taken for discussion which I answer as under :

ISSUES

FINDINGS

No. (3) Whether the action of the Management of Indian Oil Blending Ltd. , Mumbai in terminating the services of Sh . H. Yunoos by way of dismissalw.e.f. 9-4-99 is legal andjustified?

(4) What relief the workman is entitled to?

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] superiors and wilfully showing down in performance of work and even commissioning any act of subversive of discipline or good behaviour on the premises of the Plant particularly mentioning the incident dated 26th July, 1996 when2nd Party refused to work in drum filling area. When he refused to work there as per the order of his superior Mr. D.R. More and then as per directions Mr.M.G.Gharat still the concerned workman did not did that work in Drum Filling Area . He replied to the said charge sheet by his reply dated 24-8-1996 saying that, he is ready to work any where in drum filling area other than work of cleaning the stencils as he never did said work . On the basis of that, Enquiry was initiated and Enquiry Officer observed charges levelled against him are proved. Even Enquiry Officer observed concerned workman has committed said act of misconduct which amounts to insubordination , disobeying the orders of his superiors which affect on the production ofthe 1st party.

(8) The stand of the 2nd Party is that, that was the only incident which took place and for that , punishment of dismissal is harsh and not just and proper and is highly disproportionate. Whereas case of the 1st party is that , since Ist party purposely disobeyed the orders of the superior and which he has admitted it affected on the production of the 1st party and it gave bad signal as weli as bad impression on the other employees as it find difficult for management to get work done from the employees if such behaviour is tolerated .

(9) To prove that, 2nd Party filed his affidavit in lieu ofthe examination- in- chief at Exhibit 22 reiterating the same thing stating that, that was the orly incident and for that punishment of dismissal is not just and proportionate. Then he closed his evidence by filing closing purshis at Exhibit28.

(10) Against that, Ist Party examined its witness Babanrao Dyandas Chougale by filing his affidavit in lieu ofhis examination - in- chiefat Exhibit 30 who states that , the concerned workman committed misconduct of disobeying orders of his superior which create very bad impression . He states that , as per the standing orders punishment ofdismissal is legal and proper on the proved misconduct and is just and proper. in the cross he states that,he acted as Presenting Officer in the enquiry. He admits that, he was not present when the work was given to the concerned workman and when he refused the work . On that1st Party closed its evidence by filing closing purshis atExhibit31.

(11) 2nd Party filed written arguments with citations at Exhibit 32 and the 1st Party replied it by filing written arguments at Exhibit 34 with citations .

2ndParty

isentitled

for re- instate-

ment but

without

back wages.

REASONS:

IssueNo.3:

(7) 2nd Party was charge - sheeted on the charges of misconduct and wilful insubordination and disobeying or disobedience of lawful and reasonable orders of the (12) As stated above incident dated 26-7 1996 was the only incident of that type on which the concerned workmen refused to do the work in Drum Filling Arca . The explanation given by the concerned workmen which is on record reveals that , he has no objection to give work anywhere in Drum Filling Are except the work of cleaning stencils . For that he explains that , he never attended work ofcleaning of stencils and he requested to give any work other than the work of cleaning stencils . It is to be noted that, that was the only incident took place of that type which is not disputed at all . It is also brought on record by भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ].

the 1st Party by cross examining the concerned workman atExhibit 22. Even in the cross he admits that, he refusedto attend the work of cleaning the stencils . When concerned workman says that, he refused to attend the work of cleaning stencils and when in writing he states that, he never did that work and that was the only incident in his service life when he worked for 25 years with 1st Party. In my considered view definitely punishment for such an isolated incident termination cannot be treated proportionate as well as just and proper.

13) 1st Party has filed copy of Standing Orders with Exhibit 17. But it is not pointed out which standing orders are attracted to the concerned workman, who once in the service life refused to work on the work which he never did. Even it is not the case of the 1st party that he was doing that work but he purposely refused to attend that work just to disobey his superiors or just to insult their order. Even it is not the case of the 1st Party that, 2nd Party has that habit and has repeated the same time and again to invite such an action . It is to be noted that , termination of services is rather capital punishment in the labour jeuoperndence . If any person commits acts of misconduct and such charges are proved against him he can be convicted considering the gravity of the act done by that person. Besides IPC in various convictions are suggested but considering the act done by the accused and considering the consequences of that act the victim is punished. Here only one i.e. isolated act of refusing the work that too of cleaning stencils is brought on record which he never did in his service life was noted in the service life ofthe concerned workman of 25 years. When that was the only incident which he committed in the 25 years' service, I am ofthe considered view that, for a single and isolated incident punishment of termination is harsh and cannot be sustained .

14) LdAdvocate for the 1st Party placed reliance on the citation published in 1997 I CLR page 13 where Apex Court while deciding the Civil Appeal between New Shorrock Mills and Maheshbhai T. Rao observed that, when Court observe enquiry is fair and proper and finding not perverse in that case generally Court need not interfere in the punishment. At the same time it is observed that, such a punishment should not be given by way of victimization and there should be such a serious and grave misbehaviour proved against the concerned workman. Here such a serious misbehaviour cannot be said to have been proved and it being an isolated act of refusing to work of cleaning the stencils work in Drum filling area, which was neverjob ofthe concerned workman or which he never did during his service life and which is not disputed by the 1st Party it cannotbe treated as a misconduct of serious nature as observed by the Apex Court in the above case Supra. Citationpublished in 1999 II CLR page 926 while deciding the case ofMaharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v/sBhimrao s / o Ganpatrao Gunde where our Hon'ble High Court observed that, the Court should take into consideration the record of the workman while conferring with the punishment. Here no such record is produced by the 1st Party as happened in the above case Supra. There was a charge sheet but on a different cause . It cannot be said that, 2nd Party has repeated it and service record produced of the 2nd Party does not show that, that such 69561/09-25

1137

thing had happened even in the past as happened in that case.Besides citation published in 2005 of 1 CLR page 1074 in the case ofMadhya Pradesh Electricity BoardV/S. Jagdish Chandra Sharma where Apex Court observed that :

"...when punishment of termination is awarded for hitting and injuring a superior officer in that case with no extenuating circumstances established, it cannot be said to be not justified and it cannot be termed unduly harsh or disproportionate.

However, facts of that, case were that , the workman involved in that case was charge sheeted for hitting and injuring his superior officer at workplace which is not the case with the 2nd Party involved in this . So the said decision does not invite us to confirm the punishment given by the 1st Party. The same view can be taken about the citationpublished in 2007 II CLRpage 845 where Apex Court in deciding the case ofManagement of Coimbatore District Central Co -op . Bank vs Secretary, District Central Coop.BankEmployees Association & anr . observed that, Enquiry Officer observed that, the concerned workman isguilty of the charges in that case , Court cannot interfere inthe punishment . However, in that case there was illegal strike and notice was issued under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and that, the Union was informed not to go on strike when settlement took place and though strike was called off. However , the concerned employees refused to join the duty as per the settlement and remained absent . But here case and facts of the workman at hand is quite different than those Citation referred published in 2008 I CLR page 847 while deciding the case ofU.P. State Road Corporation vs Vinod Kumar where it was observed that, once the Enquiry is observed as fair andproper and finding not perverse , in that case it isnot necessary to interfere with the punishment awarded. However, in that case workman was appointed as a Conductor in U.P. Road Transport Corporation . He was conductor at that time on a bus which was on scheduled route from Kalsi to Chinnai which was checked and on inspection it was found that, out of 45 passengers 28 passengers from Kalsi to Chinnai were without tickets and the inspecting team found that, the conductor had already recovered fare from the said passengers without issuing ticket and found only 6 tickets were issued which were not in seriatim too . So definitely that was a serious charge as compared with the charge levelled or said proved against the present employee .

15) Taking into consideration the case laws on which 1stParty rely to show that, this Court cannot interfere in the punishment I am of the view that, there was isolated incident which in my considered view does not permit 1st Party to terminate the services of the employees . For that, giving such punishment there should be charges of that type and for that punishment should be proportionate to the act done by the concerned workman . When act of misconduct is proved but when the nature ofthe said act is isolated incident which occurred for the first time in the service life of25 years of the concerned workman and for that, hewas terminated for ever from the employment . I feel it is not just and proper or proportionate to act proved. So I conclude that, punishment of dismissal imposed upon the workman for the isolated act is harsh one and is not just and proper. So I answer this issue accordingly.

1138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] ISSUENO . 4:

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/ 26/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Dorabashaw B. Crusetjee Sons (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-2-2009.

[No. L-31011 /16/2001 - IR (M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO . II AT MUMBAI

Present : A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT- 2 /26 of2002 16) When concerned workman succeeds in showing that, for isolated act punishment is harsh one , in my considered view, he is entitled for reinstatement . He states that, he has no work and he is managing the family any how and he also states that he did not get any work though he tried. Here he has not shown that , he tried for the job but he could not get it and able to gain . He does not utter any word about his financial crisis which he might have suffered as a result of termination . He has not stated anything about family crisis and is silent how his family suffered as a result of his termination. Besides charge of disobeying order ofsuperior is proved. Though it is isolated act some punishment must be there . Besides he did not work from termination till then. So not giving back wages is the sufficient punishment for that proved misconduct which is sufficient to my consideration . So, in my considered view the 2nd Party is not entitled for back wages as he failed to prove the claim for payment ofback wages .

Employers in relation to the management of M/s . Darabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons (Bombay) Pvt . Ltd. 17 At the same time I am of the view that he must be reinstated on the pay scale on which he was terminated immediately by the 1st Party till he retires on attainingthe age of superannuation.

1.The Managing Director , M/s . Darabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. Darabshaw House , Ballard Pier , Mumbai 400 010 . ....First Party 18) In view ofthe discussions made above I conclude that, the reference require to be partly allowed. Hence , the order:

ORDER

2.Mumbai Port Trust Vijay Deep , S.V. Marg , Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400 001.

a) Reference is partly allowed;

AND

Their Workman,

Shri Rajbhan Santbhan , Singh R.No. 27, Zakaria Bunder Road, Sewree, Mumbai -400015. Second Party b) 1st Party i.e. Indian Oil Corporation now renamed as Indian Oil Blending Ltd. is directed to reinstate the workman H. Yunoos on the post on which he was terminated w.e. f. 9-4-1999 and is directed to continue him in the employment till he attain the age superannuation ;

APPEARANCE

c) prayer of the 2nd Party of back wages is rejected;

d) in the circumstances there is no order as to its costs.

Forthe Employers ( 1 ) Mr. B.K. Ashok, Advocate . (2) Mr. Umesh Nabar, Advocate Bombay, 7th January, 2009

Mr. R.R. Yadav , Advocate For the Workman Date of Passing the Award : 22-12-2008

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer

AWARD

नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2009

The reference is sent to this Tribunal by the Under Secretary of Central Government. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour by its Order No. L-31011/ 16/2001 (IR-M) dated28th February , 2002 in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to decide:

का.आ 592, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. दोरबासाव बी. कुसेटजी सन्स ( मुम्बई ) प्रा.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. II , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -2 /26/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-31011/16/2001- आई आर( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

"Wherther the action of the Management of M/s . Darabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons (Bombay) Pvt . Ltd. , Con- tractor, M/ s . Mumbai Port Trust in terminating the ser- vices of Shri Rajbhan Santbhan Singh , Carpenter w.e.f. 3-9-99 is legal and justified ? Ifnot what relief the workman isentitled to ? "

New Delhi , the 10th February , 2009

S.O. 592.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central

2) Statement ofClaim is filed by the concerned Work- manat Ext. 5. Said was replied by the 1st Party ( 1) by filing Written Statement at Exhibit 9. It was replied by the con- cernedWorkman by filing rejoinder at Exhibit 27.

1139 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7 , 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(1) Mr. Rajbhan Santbhan Singh , Room No. 27, Zakaria Bunder Road, Sewree, Mumbai- 400015

(3) Issues were framed by my Ld. Predecessor at Exhibit 11 and Reference was posted for recording evi- dence.

(2) Mr. A. Abdul Kadar,

(4)Meanwhile concerned Workman came with a pro- posal of settlement at Exhibit 28 and informed that, the dispute is settled and he requested to take the Reference before Lok Adalat .

RoomNo. 3 , Bharati Nagar , Tilak Nagar, Chembur , Mumbai -400 089 . (hereinafter referred to as the " Employees" ) of the party ofthe Second Part .

(5)Accordingly Reference was placed for consider- ation before the Lok Adalat on 22nd December, 2008. Hence , the order.:

ORDER

In view of the Exhibit 28 and 29 Reference is dis- posed of in Lok Adalat .

A.A.Lad, Presiding Officer.

Bombay, 22nd December, 2008 .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS- TRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2 AT MUMBAI

Reference No. CGIT - 2/26 of2002

BETWEEN

1. M/s . Darabshaw Cursetjee's Sons (Bombay) Ltd.

2.Employers in relation of the Management ofMumbai PortTrust

V/s.

Mr. Rajbhan Santbhan Singh.

MAY IT PLEASE THIS HON'BLE COURT

Whereas the party of the second party were em- ployedwith the Party of the First Part , as Carpenter -cum- Sewing man . They raised an Industrial Dispute challeng- ing termination of their service by the First Party company.The said dispute was referred before the Hon'ble Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Mumbai , under Reference No. CGIT- 2/26 of 2002 and Reference No. CGIT 2/9 of 2002 respectively of both the above named second party. The party of the first part have contended that both the second party were legally retrenched by fol- lowing due process of law and by complying very strictly with all the provisions of law, specially Section 25F of Industrial Dispute Act ,Act , 1947. The First party company have further contended that the stevedoring business of the company had gone down miserably and it was not pos- sible for the company to continue its stevedoring busi- ness and in the circumstances the company surrendered their stevedoring Licence to the Mumbai Port Trust by their letter dated 24th April , 2000. The first party company have further contended in their W.S. that after surrender- ing the stevedoring Licence to the Mumbai Port Trust al- most all the employees of the company who were engaged in stevedoring work were retrenched by the company and paid according to the Law . The said both the Reference is pending for hearing before the said Hon'ble Tribunal .

TheSecondParty workman states that he has settled all his claim, dispute with the Frist Party above named, monetarily and hence he does not wish to proceed with the Reference further . A memorandum of Settlement to that effect have been executed between the parties..

And whereas the Second party employees and the FirstParty employer negotiated with the matter / claim and after discussions , both the parties arrived at the settlement on the following terms and conditions:

It is therefore, prayed that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass an Award disposing of the Reference as settled out of Court.

Mumbai:

Date: 11-11-2008

(Second Party Workman)

Explained & Identified byme

B.K. Ashok

R.R. Yadav

1. The party ofthe First Part doth paid to the second PartyNo. 1 a sum of Rs . 1,60,000 (Rupees one lac sixty thousand only) and an amount ofRs . 1,40,000 (Rupees one lac fourty thousand only) to the Second Party No. 2 to- wards full and final settlement of all their claim dispute raised in above mentioned ?References . The receipt ofthe amounts , both the Second party admit and acknowledge in thisMemorandum of Settlement .

Advocate for IstPartyNo.1

Advocate for Second Party.

MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT

2.The First Party company hereby agree to take im- mediate steps for payment of Provident Fund amount ac- cumulated along with interest to the Second Party work- men, at the earliest possible .

Under Section 2 (p) of Industrial Disputs Act, 1947.

This Memorandam of Settlement is made and entered into at Mumbai on this 11th day ofNovember , 2008 , Between:-

M/S . DARABSHAW B. CURSETJI'S SON (BOM) LTD. ,

Darabshaw House , Ballard Pier, Mumbai -200001 .

2A. The Second Party employees hereby declares that they have settled all their claim , dispute in full and final and on receipt of the said amounts , and they shall not have any claim of reinstatement, re -employment, back wages, earned wages , leave wages , bonus , retrenchment compensation, Gratuity, overtime wages and/ or any other claim ofwhatsoever nature against the First Party employer.

(hereinafter referred to as the "Employer " ) of the party of the firstPart,

And

3. The Second Party employees further undertake that they will not raise any claim of whatsoever nature against the First Party or against its Directors or against Mumbai Port Trust, at any time in future.

1140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

I say that I received the above mentioned amounts as follows:

4. The Second Party employees hereby undertaketo file settlement purshish before the said Hon'ble Tribunal , praying disposal of both the Reference , as settled out of Court.

Rs. 1,40,000 (Rupees one lac fourty thousand only) by Cheque No. 006695 dated 7-11-08 drawn on Bank of India Branch . Ballard Estate .

ShriD.Kapadia.

( 1) Shri , Rajbhan Santbhan Singh

Mumbai ,

Dated 11-11-08

ForM/ s . Darabshaw Cursetji's Sons (Bom) Ltd. ,

(Mr. A. Abdul Kadar ) (2) Shri . A. Abdul Kadar , Second Party Employees Witnesses:

First Party Employer

Witnesses:

1. R. R. Yadav Advocat

2. R. M. Roshan Singh

Signed illigible Receipt

(1) Mr. H. B. Anchan, Advocate

(2) Mr. S. B. Kedam , Advocate

Mr. D. Kapadia Rep. ofManagement No. 1 1, Mr Rajbhan Santbhan Singh, Received with thanks from M/s . Darabshaw Cursetji's Sons ( Bom) Ltd. , the First party employer, a sum of Rs . 1,60,000 ( Rupees one lac Sixtythousand only) towards full and final settlement of all my dues and claims made in Reference No. CGIT - 2/9 of 2002. I hereby declare that hereafter I shall not have any claim of reinstatement,it, re- employment,re - employment , back wages , earned wages, leave wages , Commission , bonus , Gratuity , over- timewages or any other claim of watsoever nature against the said M/s . Darabshaw Cursetji's Sons (Bom) Ltd. I also hereby declare that hereafter I shall move an application to dispose of the said Refernece as settled out of Court . I further undertake not to initiate any proceeding against the said employer at anytime in future.

Proceedings of the Lok Adalat held on 22nd December , 2008. PanelMembers : (3) Mr. R. S. Pai , Advocate Reference No. CGIT-2/26of 2002 D.B.E. Sons (Bom) P. Ltd. and their V/ s . R. S. Singh Present:- R. S. Singh -Workman Mr. Umesh Nabhar , Advocate for Management No. 2 Parties have amicably settled the abve matter . Settelment filed at Ex . 28 sent to Tribunal for award .

(Umesh Nabar , Adv. Manager No. 2) I say that I received the above mentioned amounts as follows:

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी, 2009

Rs . 1,60,000 (Rupees one lac sixty thousand only) by Cheque No. 006696 dated 7-11-08 drawn on Bank of India Branch , Ballard Estate .

Mumbai,

Dated 11-11-08

(Mr. Rajbhan Santbhan Singh)

Witnesses:

1. R. R. Yadav Advocat

का.आ. 593.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कोचीन रिफाईनरी लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , इर्नाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी.- 14/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2. R. M. Roshan Singh

Signed Illigible

[सं. एल-30011/33/2005- आईआर ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी Receipt

Signed illigible Signed illigible Signed illigible New Delhi , the 10th February, 2009

S.O. 593. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. I.D. 14/ 2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cochin refinery Ltd. and their workman . which was received by the Central Government on 10-2-2009.

1, Mr A. Abdul Kadar , received with thanks from M/s . Darabshaw Cursetji's Sons (Bom ) Ltd. , the First party employer, a sum of Rs . 1,40,000 (Rupees one lac fourty thousand only) towards full and final settlement of all my dues and claims made in Reference No. CGIT - 2/26 of2002 . I hereby declare that hereafter I shall not have any claim of reinstatement, re - employment , back wages , earned wages , leavewages, Commission , bonus , Gratuity, overtime wages or any other claim of watsoever nature against the said M/ s . Darabshaw Cursetji's Sons (Bom) Ltd. I also hereby declare that hereafter I shall move an application to dis- pose of the said Refernece as settled out of Court . I further undertake not to initiate any proceeding against the said employer at anytime in future .

[No. L-30011 /33/2005 - IR (M ) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer 1141 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the offical gazette.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ERNAKULAM

Dictated to the Personal Assistant transcribed and typed by her , corrected and passed by me on this the 28th dayofJanuary, 2009.

P.L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer Present: Shri P. L. Norbert , B.A.L.L.B. , Presiding Officer

Appendix

Witness for Union

(Wednesday the 28th day of January, 2009/ 8th Magha 1930)

WW1- Shri . Surendran Nair (By ProofAffidavit)- dt. 22-02-2006.

LD. 14 OF 2005

Witnesses for Management: Nil.

TheGeneral secretary,

Union

Document for the Union:

CochinRefineries Employees '

Association , Cochin

Refineries Limited,

W1- Photostat copy of Memorandum of Promotion Policy Statement dated 31-07-1973

Ambalamughal-682302.

By Adv. Sri . C. S. Ajith

W2- Photostat copy of representation submitted by the Union to RLC (C) dated 21-12-2004.

Prakash .

TheDy.General Manager

W3 Photostat copy of statement submitted by the mangenment to ALC(C) dated 07-02-2005.

Management :

(HRD& IR)

CochinRefineries Ltd. ,

W4 Photostat copy ofstatenment submittedby Union toALC(C) dated 11-02-2005

Ambalamughal-682302.

By Adv . M/s . Menon &Pai . WS- Photostat copy of statement filed by the management before ALC (C) dated 31-03-2005.

AWARD

W6 Photostat coyp of statement filed by the Union beforeALC(C) dated05-04-2005.

Nil

Document for Management

नई दिल्ली , 11 फरवरी , 2009

1. This is a reference made by Central Government under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) and (2A) of Industrial disputes Act, 1947 to this court for adjudication. The dispute referred is:--

"Whether the action of the management of Cochin Refinery Ltd. in promotimg a few workmen to grade IV with sarme designation of Typist Clerk Trainee even without notifying the vacancy as per the requirement of promotion policy settlement is right? If not what is the relief to the eligible workers ? ".

का.आ. 594.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 6/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को11-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/61 /2005- आईआर ( सीएम II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 11th February, 2009 2. Thoughparties entered appearance and filed their pleadings when the matter came up for evidence the union has been taking time to lead evidence . At last the case was posted finally for evidence of the union on this day. But today also the counsel as well as the union representative are absent. A representation is made for adjournment. A representation is made for adjournment . The case has been pending for adjudication for the last 4 years . Nobody benefits by merely keeping the case pending indefinitly. It appears from the attitude of the union that they have no grieveance and there is no existing dispute for adjudication.

S.O. 594. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 6/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 11-02-2009.

In the result, an award is passed finding that the action, of the management, in promoting a few workmen to Grade- IV with the same designation of Typist Clerk Trainee without notifying the vacancy, is legal and justified and the workers are not entitled for any relief.

[No. L-22012/61/2005 - IR (CM- II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 695 61/09-26 1142

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

[PART II SHC . 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

New Delhi , the 11th February, 2009 BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH ,

CASE No. 6/2006

Shri Nafe Singh C/o Sh. Dharampal, Village- Chandana, The .

&district, Kaithal , Haryana.

..Applicant

S.O. 595. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 8/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workman, received by the CentralGovernment ori 11-02-2009.

Versus

[No. L - 22012 /59/2005- IR (CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer The Sr. Regional Manager, FCI , SCO, 120-122, Sector 17C, Chandigarh.

.....Rospondent

ANNEXURE

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : None

For the Management :

Shri N.K.Zakhmi

AWARD

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH.

Passed on: 30-1-2009 Camp Kurukshetra -

CASE No. 8/2006

Shri Prem Chand , C/o Sh. Dharampal , Village . Chandana , The. & District Kaithal, Haryana .

........Applicant Central Govt vide notification No. L -22012/61/2005- IR( CM - II ) , dated 21-12-2005 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

Versus

The Sr. Regional Manager , FCI , SCO, 120-122 , Sector 17C, Chandigarh. ......Rospondent "Whether the action of the mangement of Food Corpration ofIndia , Karnal in terminating the services of Shri Nafe Singh instead of regularizing is legal andjustified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"

APPEARANCES

None

Shri N. K. Zakhmi

For the Workman: For the Management

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-2009 Camp Kurukshetra

Central Govt vide notification No. L-22012/59/2005- IR( CM - II ) , dated 21-12-2005 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

2. Workman is not present . No representative of the workman is present . Representative of the managnement is present . Since morning , this reference was taken up several times . None was present for the workman. It is now 4 PM. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Govt . because the workman is not interseted in adjudication of this reference. Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government . Central Govt . be informed.

Chandigarh. 30-01-2009 Camp at Kurukshetra

" Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India , Karnal in terminating the services of Shri Prem Chand instead of regularizing is legal and justified ? If not ,to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 11 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 595,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 8/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2.Workman is not present . No representative ofthe workman is present . Representative of the management is present. Since morning , this reference was taken upseveral times . None was present for the workman . It is now 4 PM . At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Govt. becaause the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference. Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Government . Central Government be informed.

Chandigarh. 30-01-2009 Camp at Kurukshetra .

[सं. एल -22012/59/2005- आईआर ( सीएम II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

1 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1143

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 11 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 596.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/66/2005- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th February, 2009 S.O. 596. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 2/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workman, receivedby the Central Government on 11-02-2009 .

[No. L- 22012/66/2005- IR (CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. 2/2006

.....Applicant Shri Sarna Ram, C/ o Sh . Dharampal , Village . Chandana, Th. & District, Kaithal , Haryana.

Versus

The Sr. Regional Manager, FCI , SCO, 120-122, Sector 17C, Chandigarh. .....Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman :

None

Shri N.K.Zakhmi

For the Management :

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-2009, Camp Kurukshetra Central Govt . vide notification No. L-22012/66/2005- IR(CM- II), dated 21-12-2005 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, Karnal in terminating the services ofShri Sarna Ram instead of regularizing is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"

At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Govt . because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference. Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Govt. Central Govt . be informed.

-Chandigarh, 30-01-2009 Camp at Kurukshetra

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 11 फरवरी , 2009

का.आ. 597. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 4/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-22012/63/2005- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 11th February, 2009 S.O. 597. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 4/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of FoodCorporation of India, and their workman , received by the Central Government. Central Government on 11-02-2009.

[No. L-22012/63 /2005 - IR( CM-II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. 4/2006

Shri Raghubir , C/o Sh . Dharampal, Village. Chandana, Teh . &District, Kaithal , Haryana . .......Applicant Versus

The Sr. Regional Manager, FCI , SCO, 120-122, Sector 17C, Chandigarh . ..Respondent

APPEARANCES

None

For theWorkman:

Shri N.K. Zakhmi For theManagement [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

1144

Versus

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-2009 , Camp Kurukshetra

..Respondent

The Sr. Regional Manager , FCI , SCO , 120-122 , Sector 17C, Chandigarh.

APPEARANCES

Central Government vide notification No. L- 22012/ 63/2005 - IR (CM- II ), dated 21-12-2005 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

None

Forthe Workman

Shri N.K. Zakhmi

: For the Management

AWARD

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, Karnal in terminating the services of Shri. Raghubir Singh instead of regularizing is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

Passed on: 30-1-2009 , Camp Kurukshetra

Central Government vide notification No. L- 22012/ 62/2005-1R( CM - II ) , dated 21-12-2005 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the mangement of Food Corpration of India, Karnal in terminating the services ofShri Satyawan instead of regularizing is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2. Workman is not present. No representative of the workman is present. Representative of the management is present. Since morning , this reference was taken up several times. None was present for the workman . It is now 4 PM . Atthis stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference. Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Govt. Central Government be informed.

Chandigarh, 30-01-2009 Camp at Kurukshetra

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 11 फरवरी , 2009

2. Workman is not present . No representative ofthe workman is present . Representative of the management is present . Since morning, this reference was taken up several times. None was present for the workman . It is now 4 PM . At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Govt . because the workman is not interseted in adjudication of this reference . Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Govt . Central Government be informed.

Chandigarh, 30-01-2009 Camp at Kurukshetra

का.आ. 598.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer [सं. एल-22012/62/2005- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 फरवरी , 2009

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th February , 2009

का.आ. 599. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । S.O.598 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes.Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.5/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management ofFood Corporation of India, and their workman, received by the Central Government on 11-02-2009 .

[सं. एल -22012/65/2005- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th February, 2009 [No. L-22012/62/2005 - IR ( CM- II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

S.O. 599. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 3/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workman , received by the Central Government on 11-02-2009 .

Case No. 5/2006

[No. L-22012/65 /2005 - IR (CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

Applicant

Shri Satyawan, C/ o Sh . Dharampal , Village- Chandana , Teh. & District, Kaithal , Haryana.

11:45 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 11th February, 2009 ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. 3/2006

.......Applicant

Shri Bundu, C/o Sh. Dharampal, Village. Chandana, Teh .& District Kaithal, Haryana .

S.O. 600.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 1/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , which was received by the. Central Government on 11-02-2009.

Versus

[No..L- 22012/67/2005- IR (CM -II )]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

..Respondent

The Sr. Regional Manager , FCI, SCO, 120-122, Sector 17C, Chandigarh.

ANNEXURE

APPEARANCES

None

For the Workman

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMARSHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Shri N.K. Zakhmi

For the Management

Case No. 1/2006

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-2009 Camp Kurukshetra

Sh. Dharampal, Village . Chandana, Teh. & District, Kaithal , Haryana. .......Applicant

Versus

Central Govt vide notification No. L-22012/65/2005 -IR(CM- II) , dated 21-12-2005 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

Respondent

The Sr. Regional Manager, FCI , SCO, 120-122 , Sector 17C , Chandigarh.

APPEARANCES

None

Forthe Workman

Shri N.K.Zakhmi

For the Management

Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, Karnal in terminating the services of Shri Bundu instead of regularizing is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"

AWARD

Passed on: 30-1-2009 Camp Kurukshetra

Central Government vide notification No. L-22012/ 67/2005 - IR( CM - II) , dated 21-12-2005 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-- 2.Workman is not present. No representative ofthe workman is present . Representative ofthe management is present, Since morning, this reference was taken up several times . None was present for the workman . It is now 4 PM . At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference. Accordingly , the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Govt . Central Government be informed.

Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India , Karnal in terminating the services of Shri Dharam Pal instead of regularizing is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled? "

Chandigarh . 30-01-2009 Camp at Kurukshetra

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 11 फरवरी , 2009

2. Workman is not present . No representative of the workman is present. Representative of the management is present. Since morning, this reference was taken up several times. None was present for the workman . It is now 4: PM. At this stage I have no option otherwise than to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the workman is not interested in adjudication of this reference . Accordingly, the claim petition filed by the workman is dismissed and the reference is returned as such to the Central Govt. Central Government be informed.

का.आ. 600.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण न. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ पंचाटः( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। Chandigarh. 30-01-2009 Camp at Kurukshetra

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer [सं. एल-22012/67/2005- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी

695 G1/09-27 1146

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009/PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली , 12 फरवरी , 2009

Lal , Village-Hamirpur , P.O. - Tiuliya, Distt . & Tehsil- Bareilly and the Director , Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar , Bareilly for adjudication .

2.The reference under adjudication is:

का.आ. 601.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं इण्डियन वेटरनरी रिसर्च इन्स्टीट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 27/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

" क्या प्रबंधन भारतीय पशु चिकित्सा अनुसंधान संस्थान , इज्जतनगर, बरेली द्वारा श्री मायाराम , दैनिक श्रमिक को दिनांक 12-11-1992 से नौकरी से निकाला जाना उचित तथा न्यायसंगत है ? यदि नहीं , तो संबंधित कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ? "

[सं. एल -42012/85/2004-आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th February, 2009

S.O. 601- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.27/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Indian Veterinary Research Institute and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 12-2-2009 .

[No. L-42012/ 85/ 2004- IR (CM - II) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

Present: Shri N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer

I.D.No. 27/2005

Ref. No. L-42012/ 85/2004- IR ( CM - II) dated: 29-6-2005

BETWEEN

Shri Maya Ram, S/o Shri Mohan Lal , Village-Hamir pur, PO. -Tiuliya, Distt & Tehsil- Bareilly ( U.P. )

3. The case of the workman in brief is that he was appointed for indefinite period as regular labour on 16-1-92, without any appointment order, by the management of IVRI for performing regular and perennial work after due selection and was paid monthly salary, initially computed @Rs . 17.35 per day along with other regular employees. The workman has alleged that although he continued to work continuously since his appointment , but the management reflected some artificial breaks in its records so as to deprive him of the benefits of the continuous service and on 12-11-92 all of sudden his services were terminated, orally, all of sudden without assigning any reason therefor, which amounts to unfair labour practice under section 2 (ra) and violates provisions contained in section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It has been alleged by the workman that the management has not complied with the requirement of Rule 77 of Industrial Disputes Act (Central ) Rules , 1957 in not preparing any seniority list ofdaily wages employees and has violated theprovisions of section 25 G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 by adopting pick and choose method and not following last come first go method , whereby it has retained the services of several workmen who were junior to him . The workman has further alleged that the retrenchment of hisservices is wholly illegal and unjustified as there was neither reduction in work load not there was any shrinkage of cadre rather the work - load has increase with the expansion of the establishment . Accordingly , the workman has prayed that the oral order of termination dated 12-11- 92be set aside with consequential benefits including full back wages.

AND

TheDirector,

4. The workman has filed following documents to substantiate his averments in the statement of claim:

Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar,

Bareilly ( U.P. ) - 243122

(1) Photo copy of work certificate dated 7-2-92 w.e.f. 17-1-92 to 7-2-92, paper No. 6/1 .

AWARD

(u) Photo copy of work certificate dated 9-5-92 for 88 days, paper No.6/2 .

Dated, 5-2-2009

(iii) Photo copy ofwork certificate dated 11-11-92 for 89 days , paper No.6/3 .

(iv) Photo copy of mark sheet , Jr High School Exam , 1981 , paper No. 6/4 .

(v) Photo copy of transfer Certificate , paper No. 6/3 .

1.By order No. L-42012 / 85 / 2004 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 29-6-2005 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrialdispute between Shri Maya Ram , S/o Shri Mohan

(vi) Photo copy of application dated 20-2-2004, addressed to ALC ( C) , Dehradun , paper No. 6/6 .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

(vii) Photo copy of application dated 23-2-2004, addressed to ALC (C) , Dehradun , paper No. 6/7 .

(viii) Photo copy of Letter dated 25-6-86 , 22-1-87 and 10-9-88 ofICAR regarding engagement/appointment ofcasual labourers , paper No. 6/8, 6/9.

(ix) Photo copy ofmuster roll, skilled/non - skilled labour for the month ofMarch, 1994, paper No. 6/10.

(x) Photo copy of muster roll, of the month of March, 1994, paper No. 6/11.

(xi) Photo copy of muster roll and payment sheet, paperNo.6/12.

(xii) Photo copy of muster roll, period not legible , paper No.12.

(xiii) Photo copy of muster roll for February , 95, paper No. 6/13 .

(xiv) Photo copy of circular dated 2-5-95 regarding vacancy in IVRI, paper No. 6/ 14-6/17.

(xv) Photo copy of advertisement in newspaper regarding vacancy in IVRI , paper No. 6/18.

(xvi) Photo copy of quotation notice pertaining to IVRI, paperNo. 6/19-6/20.

(xvii) Photo copy of tender notice pertaining to IVRI , paperNo. 6/21 .

(xviii) Photo copy of quotation notice pertaining to IVRI , paperNo. 6/22.

(xix) Photo copy of office order dated Feb , 97 to discourage the practice of carrying out work through contract labour , paper No. 6/23 .

(xx) Photo copy of office order dated 17-8-98 regarding drawl of pay by certain workmen who have been granted temporary status paper No. 6/24.

(xxi) Photo copy of office memorandum dated 13-10-83 regarding regularization of casual employees in Group 'D' posts, paper No. 6/25 .

(xxii) Photo copy of some circular , not legible , paper No. 6/26 .

(xxiii) Photo copy of office memorandum dated 7-6-89 regarding recruitment of casual workers and persons on daily wages-review of policy, paper No. 6/27-6/29 .

(xxiv) Photo copy of letter dated 16-9-88 regarding guidelines relating to appointment of casual labourers in the ICAR institutes , paper No. 6/30.

(xxv) Photo copy of letter dated 16th December , year not legible, regarding guidlines relating to appointment of casual labourers in the ICAR institutes , paper No.6/31.

(xxvi) Photo copy of office memorandum dated 7-2-90 regarding recruitment of casual workers and persons on daily wages review of policy, paper No. 6/32.

1147

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

(xxvii) Photo copy of circular dated 8-8-94 , paper No. 6/33 .

(xviii) Photo copy of office memorandum dated 10-9-93 regarding grant of temporary status and regularization of causal workers, paper No. 6/34- 6/37.

(xix) Photo copy of minutes of meeting with casual labourers, paper No. 6/39.

(xx) Photo copy of a portion of newspaper dated 14-2-97, paper No. 6/40.

(xxi) Photo copy of work certificate dated 19-8-92 for 90 days , paper No. 17/2 .

5.After filing of statement of claim with documents by the workman, the registered notice was issued to the opposite party, requiring to file their written statement with relevant documents on 28-10-2005 . On the date fixed i.e. 28-10-2005 the opposite party filed its authority and an application was filed by the representative of the opposite party for adjournment , seeking four weeks time to file written statement . Subsequently, on three consecutive dates i.e. 18-11-2005, 9-12-2005 and 10-1-2006, whereby theopposite party was directed to file its written statement withdocumentary evidence and list of witness with advance. copyto theworkman.

6. The opposite party did not file any written statement in spite of providing several opportunities and finally 16-5-2007 was fixed for ex- party evidence of the workman . The workman concluded its evidence on 10-1-2006 and date was fixed for ex-parte arguments .

7.Heard arguments of the learned representative of the workman and perused evidence on record .

8. At the outset it is pertinent to mention that the opposite party has not disputed the claim of the workman by filing its written statement. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that on 10-1-06 none was present on behalf of the opposite party, therefore , order to proceed ex -parte against the opposite party was passed , subsequently, an application was moved by the representative of the opposite party on 25-1-06 to set aside the ex -parte order which was allowed at the cost of Rs . 1000 but despite of this neither written statement was filed nor cost was paid, therefore , on 28-4-06 case to proceed ex - parte order against the opposite party was passed. Again on 9-6-06 on payment of the cost by the opposite party, an opportunity was given to file written statement within 15 days but, on next date i.e. 21-7-06 neither written statement was filed nor representative of the opposite party appeared, thus court again order for ex- parte proceeding against the opposite party, subsequent to this an application dt. 13-9-06 was moved to set aside the order dt . 13-9-06 . In the interest of justice that application was also allowed and opposite party was directed to file written statement on next date ice . 20-10-06 . Third application was moved on behalf of the opposite party to recall the ex - parte order which was again 1148

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7,2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

allowed on the cost but inspite of providing several opportunities written statement was not filed and none remain present on behalf of the opposite party .

9. Now, it is to be seen whether on the basis of oral and documentary evidence adduced by the workman he has proved his case . In this regard the workman Maya Ram stated in his statement on oath that he was appointed on 7-1-92 as labour and his services were terminated on 11-11-92 . He had further stated that he had worked continuously during the above period . He has further alleged that before termination of his services neither notice was served upon him nor any compensation was given . In support ofhis case he has produced document Exbt C-6/ 1 to Exbt C-6/38 .

10. The workman has adduced copies of 3 certificates dt. 7-2-92 ( C- 6/ 1 ) , 9-5-92 (C- 6/2) and 11-11-92 (C-6/3 ) to prove that he had worked for more than 240 days . These certificates have been issued by Incharge Farm Section , IVRI, Bareilly. Upon perusal of above certificate, it reveals that workman had worked continuously as casual labour ondailywages @ 17.35 from 17-1-92 to 11-11-92 . Although he has filed copies of the attendance register , mustor roll alongwith circulars pertaining to appointment of casual labour but the name of the workman does not find place in themuster roll or attendance register . Copies of remaining documents filed are not relevant on this point that workmanhadworked for more than 240 days .

11. The opposite party has not filed written statement disputing the claim of the workman and workman has stated in statement on oath that he had worked from 17-1-92 to 11-11-92 and copies of certificates issueddt. 7-2-92, 9-5-92 and 11-11-92 also support case of the workman that he had worked during above period as casual labour . Since there is no evidence in rebuttal of the workman's evidence therefore , it is proved from his statement on oath and aforementioned certificates that he had worked for more than240 days continuously as casual labour . The workman has alleged that before terminating his services neither notice was given to him nor compensation was paid to him , therefore , in absence of any evidence in rebuttal , it is proved that services of the workman terminated in violation of section 25F ofthe 1.D. Act .

12.Now, it is to be considered whether the workman is entitled for reinstatement . From the evidence produced by the workman it is not proved that his appointment was as a regular worker. Even from the certificatesdt . 7-2-92, 9-5-92 and 11-11-92, it reveal that he had worked as casual labour . Admittedly , services of the workman were terminated on 11-11-92 and present industrial dispute has been raised in the year 2005. The workman has neither pleaded nor stated in his statement why he kept mum till the reference was made for such a long period . Although merely on the ground of delay , claim can not be rejected while considering the request of back wages and

[PART II - SEC . 3 (ii) ]

reinstatement, above unexplained delay in raising industrial dispute is to be considered .

13. In (2005) 5 SCC 591 : 2005 SCC (L& S ) 716 between Haryana Roadways v Rudhan Singh Hon'ble Apex Court while considering the question regarding award of back wages has observed:

"There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination of service was in violation of section 25 F of the Act , entire back wages should be awarded.

However, where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small , the award of back wages for the complete period i.e. from the date oftermination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is often quite large , would be wholly inapprorpriate . Another important factor, which required to be taken into consideration, is the nature of employment . A regular service of permanent character cannot be compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calander year . "

14. In 2008 (119) FLR 877 Deepak Ganpat Tari V.N.E. Theater Pvt . Ltd. Hon'ble Bombay High Court relying on theHon'ble Apex Court ' sjudgment in 2008 ( 117 ) FLR 1086 (SC) APV K. Brahmandandam 2008 ( 118 ) FLR 376 ( SC) Telephone DM vs Keshab Deb 2006 ( 111 ) FLR 1178 ( SC) JDA V Ram Sahai , while awarding compensation of Rs . 15000 to the concerned workman considering his daily wages as Rs . 45 and in view of the fact that the workman had put in about 3 years of service , has observed as under:

" It is apparent that termination of services of a daily wager does not amount to retrenchment and for violation of section 25 - F in such circumstances , the employee cannot be given benefit of reinstatement with continuity and back wages . Hon . Apex Court has hold that in such circumstance employee is entitled to benefit of compensation only ."

15. In the light of pricniple laid down in aforementioned case laws and in view of the inordinate unexplained delay in raising this industrial dispute by the workman, it would not be just , if after such a long lapse of time, the workman is directed to be reinstated in service . The ends ofjustice would meet by paying compensation to the workman instead and in place of relief of reinstatement in service .

i 16. Having regards to these facts that the workman had worked as casual labour only and he was getting Rs . 17.35 daily wages per day at the time of alleged termination and keeping in view the entire facts of the case , the interest ofjustice would be subserved , if management is directed to pay lump sum amount of compensation only .

17.Accordingly , the management is directed to pay a sum of Rs . 8000 (Rs . Eight Thousand only) to the workman [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1149 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन16 , 1930

AWARD

(Dated: 4th February , 2009)

as compensation for termination ofhis services in violation ofSection 25F ofthe I.D. Act. The said amount should be paid to the workman with in 8 weeks of publication of the award failing which the same shall carry interest @ 8% per annum .

18. The reference is answered accordingly .

19. Award as above .

Lucknow

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 12 फरवरी , 2009

1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence ofdispute between the President, Koyla Khadan Karmachri Sangh ( AITUC) , W. C. L. , Sillewara, Distt . Nagpur-441 109 on behalf of Shri Chotelal ( Party No.1 ) andthe Sub-Area Manager, Sillewara Colliery of WCL , PO: Sillewara,Distt. Nagpur- 441 109 (Party No.2) referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letter No. L-22012/275 /89 - IR(Coal - II) dated 18-5-1990 under clause (d) ofsub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) with the following schedule .

का.आ. 602,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं डब्लू.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मे केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 53/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2." Whether the action of the managerment of M/ s . W. C. Ltd, Sillewara Colliery Nagpur in not protecting wages of Shri Chotelal , General Mazdoor Cat . I on his being given job of Fan Khalasi after being declared unfit by the Medical Board to perform the job ofLoader due to an accident while working in the mine is justified? If not , to what relief the workman concerned is entitled?"

[सं. एल-22012/275/ 1989- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th February, 2009

S.O. 602. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.53/2003 )ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workmen , which was receivedby the Central Government on 12-2-2009.

3. It seems that originally the reference was made and referred to the CGIT, Jabalpur in the year 1990 for adjudication since the CGIT, Nagpur was not established. However, consequent to the establishment of this CGIT, Nagpur, the references pending on the file of CGIT, Jabalpur. were transferred to this Court . On transfer this Court the reference whatever in the month of June, 2005.At the time oftransferring the reference to this Court, the Statement of Claim as well as Written Statement by the management again the rejoinder by the petitioner and the reply of the Rejoinder by the management were filed on record. It also seems that the petitioner had filed his affidavit also in support ofhis claim .

[No. L- 22012/275 / 1989- IR (C- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI A. N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM- LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No. CGIT/NGP/ 53/03

Date:4-2-2009

Petitioner/PartyNo. 1

The President,

Koyla Khadan Karmachari Sangh (AITUC) , W.C.L. , Sillewara, Distt. Nagpur- 441 109 onbehalf of Shri Chotelal

On 13-2-1992 and the case was fixed for cross- examination for the petitioner . On transfer , a notice was issued to the petitioner directing him to appear before the court on 13-9-2005 for further proceeding . Further, the petitioner in response to the notice as well as suo moto never appeared in the Court and further continued the reference. All the Rojnama indicates that he never attended the court on transfer . It seems that he has no interest in further prosecuting the reference . There are no reasons to continue the same waiting for his appearance . In such circumstances , the case is dismissed for his default. Accordingly the reference is dismissed for his default and no dispute award is passed. Hence Award. Date: 4-2-2009 .

Versus

A.N. YADAV, Presiding Officer Respondent/PartyNo. 2

नई दिल्ली , 12 फरवरी , 2009

The Sub -Area Manager,

Sillewara Colliery ofWCL , PO: Sillewara,

Distt. Nagpur- 441 109 .

का.आ. 603.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पी.एन्ड टी. डिपार्टमेन्ट ऑफ आर. एम. एस. सब डिविजन, पटना के प्रबंधतंत्र के 695 61/09-28 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7 , 2009 /PHALGUNA 16 , 1930

1150

engaging fresh hands after 1-5-2005 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?. "

संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 37/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/ 118/2005- आई.आर. ( डी.यू.) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th February , 2009

Subsequently vide adjudication Order No. L-40012/ 118/2005 - IR (DU) dated 15th November , 2006 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 7A read with sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 33B of the Act withdrew the proceeding from Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court - II , Dhanbad and transferred the same to this tribunal for disposal in accordance with the law.

S.O. 603. - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 37/2006) ofthe Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Patna as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of P. & T. Department ofRMS Sub-division , Patna and their workmen , whichwas received by the Central Government on 12-2- 2009.

[No. L-40012/ 118/2005 - IR (DU)] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, SHRAM BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD , PATNA

Reference Case No. 37 of 2006

No. 1 (C) of2007 .

Between the management of G. P. O. , Patna and their workman Shri Surendra Kumar , S/ o . Rajendra Kumar , Raghunath, Anisabad, Patna (Bihar).

For the Management : Shri Phanishwar Nath Paswan, Management Representative .

For the Workman : Shri Surendra Kumar (Workman himself)

Present

: Vasudeo Ram , Presiding officer AWARD

Patna, dated the 3rd February, 2009 .

2. The parties appeared on notice and filed their statement of claim and the written statement respectively . The case of the workman is that he was employed by the management as 'Mailman ' on 31-12-2002 and he continued to work as such till 30-4-2005. He performed his duties from 3 P.M. to 10.30 P.M. every day , He used to be paid @ Rs . 39.70 per day through vouchers . The workman claims to have put in more than 240 days of continuous service in a calendar year within the meaning of Section 25B of the Act preceding to the date of termination of his services on 1-5-2005 . The services of the workman was terminated on 1-5-2005 by the P & T Departmental authorities without any notice, notice pay or compensation . Further the case of the workman is that after the termination of his services on 1-5-2005 the management made appointments for the same work which the workman was performing but the workman was neither informed nor was given apportunity for employment as provided under Rule 78 of the Industrial Disputes ( Central) Rules , 1957. After termination of service on 1-5-2005 the workman sent demand notice to the management of P & T. Depaartment under registered A/D post on 1-5-2005 but the management made no response . Thereafter the workman raised industrial dispute before theAssistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Patna being the Conciliation Officer under the act . The Conciliation Officer held Conciliation Proceedings which ended in failure and on his report this reference was made for adjudication. According to the workman the action ofthe management of P. & T. Dapartment is illegal and unjustified and he deserves to be reinstated/rc-employed with full back wages .

ByadjudicationOrder No. L - 40012/ 118/2005 - IR (DU) dated 9th June, 2006, the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2-A) ofSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (hereafter called ' the Act ' for brevity) referred the dispute between the management of G.P. O. , Patna and their workman Shri Surendra Kumar , s/o Sh . Rajendra Kumar , Raghunath, Anisabad, Patna (Bihar ) to Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court - II , Dhanbad for adjudication onthe following:

"Whether the action of the management of P. & T. Department of RMS Sub -division , Patna in terminating the services of Shri Surendra Kumar w.e.f. 1-5-2005 and in not considering him for re - employment , while

3. The contention of the management , in short , is that Shri Surendra Kumar was neither appointed nor any appointment letter was issued to him by the P & T. Department. Neither his name was called for from any agency/ employment exchange nor any procedure of appointment was followed. The workman was not employed or appointed against any vacant post . He was engaged casually and his services was utilized by the management in the interest of department depending upon the urgency ofwork so that Postal Department Mail Dak Seva may not be hampered. The management contends that the said workman worked part- time as Coolie on daily wages basis and the wages was paid to him on hand - receipts as per [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ] .

1151 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन 16, 1930

guidelines of the Government on daily wages rates fixed by the Government . Since the said workman was not appointed by the management/Department there was no occasion of termination of his services nor the services of the workman was terminated by the management . According to the management the said workman cannot claim regularisation or continuation of his services in the department. Further, according to the management the workman cannot claim to have remained in continuous service of the management as defined under Section 25B ofthe Act .According to the management the case/ claim of the workman is illegal, baseless , concocted , false and fabricated and hence the reference is not maintainable in law or facts.According to the management the workman is not entitled to any relief claimed and the reference is fit only to be decided against the workman and in favour of the management .

4.Upon the pleadings of the parties and the terms of reference the following points arise out for decision:

" (i) Whether the action of the management of P & T Department , RMS Sub - Division , Patna in terminating the services of Sri Surendra Kumar w.e.f. 1-5-2005 is legal and justified?

(ii) Whether the action of the management of P & Tin not considering Sri Surendra Kumar for re- employment while engaging fresh hands after 1-5-2005 is legal andjustified ?

(iii) Whether the Reference Case is maintainable ?

(iv) To what relief or reliefs, if any, workman Surendra Kumar is entitled ? "

As already mentioned above M.W.1 claimed to have remained posted in Railway Mail Service (RMS in brief) , Patna as Inspector while the remaining witnesses of the management (M.W.2 to M.W.6) were/are Sorting Assistants in the same department . They all appear to be senior staff having remained posted in Patna for more than 12 years . Altogether 402 photocopies of payment vouchers have beenexhibited (Exts . W to W/ 401) on behalfofthe workman out ofwhich 341 (Exts . W to W/340) have been provedby M.W.1 who admitted his signatures thereon while the remaining witnessess of the management (M.Ws. 2 to 6) have also claimed their signatures on the payment vouchers and proved the vouchers (photocopy ) produced by the management (Exts . M to M/6) . All the M.Ws . have admitted in their statement made before this tribunal that Surendra Kumar worked in R.M.S. , Patna and was paid through vouchers@ Rs . 39.70 , the daily rate of labourers fixed by the Government . Payment to the workman through vouchers at the rate fixed by the Government is also supported from the photo -copy of vouchers exhibited (Exts.M to M/ 79) and ( Exts . Wto W/401 ) produced by both the parties. All the above- said witnesses of the management have stated that the workman worked. occasionally as part- time-coollie when the work- load increased in the department. The workman (W.W.1 ) has claimed and stated that he worked from 3 P.M. to 10.30 P.M. which is also supported from the fact that he was paid full daily wages , and not the part of it . M.W.5 in cross- examination has admitted that Surendra Kumar (the workman) did the work of a Mail- man . In other words he worked as mail -man .

FINDINGS.

Point No.(1)

5. Both the parties have adduced evidence , oral as well as documentary in support of their respective contentions . The management examined altogether 6 witnesses out of which one witness Vijay Shankar Prasad (M.W.1) claimed to have remained posted as Inspector, Railway Mail Service , Patna and the remaining witnesses namely Suresh Prasad (M.W.2) , Hriday Narain Singh (M.W.3), Shailendra Narayan Chowdhary (M.W.4) , Janak Prasad(M.W.5) and Ashok Kumar Jha (M.W.6) are Sorting Assistants in Patna R.M.S. As.against that the workman has examined himself only as W.W.1 . The management got exhibited photocopy of Vouchers (Exts . M to M/79) and the workman got the photocopy of vouchers marked Exts . Wto W/401 .

7. The workman (W.W.1 ) has contended and has stated before this tribunal that the put- in continuous service ofmail-man from 31-12-2002 to 30-4-2005. He worked on the orders of Senior Superintendent of Post Offices . It has come in the cross - examination of the workman (W. W.1) that the proof of payment made to him is in the Payment- Register which is in the custody of the management . M.W.4 in his cross-examination also supported that all payments made is recorded in Payment Register . It is needless to say thatpayment Register is the document of the management and it is the management in whose custody it is expected to be. I may mention here that during the trial/ proceeding the workman through this tribunal made a request to the management to produce the Payment Register and the Payment Vouchers concerning the payment made to him but the management avoided and escaped by saying that those documents could not be located, either the same have been destroyed or have been kept some where in godown . That simply meant that the management did not produce the documents called for nor any satisfactory reason for non - production of the same was shown . The management has not produced any evidence to show that the said documents have been destroyed . Under the circumstances the inference must be drawn against the 6. It is an admitted fact that neither the name ofthis workman was called for from any agency or employmentexchange nor any procedure of appointment was followed in engaging him on work . He was also not given any letter of appointment. But the management also admitted that this workman worked in RMS , Patna , according to the management he was engaged casually and he worked part - time as Coollie on daily wages basis. 695 61/09-29 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1152

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7, 2009 /PHALGUNA 16, 1930

oftermination of his services arose . Besides that termination ofemployment of daily wage employee cannot give riseto an industrial dispute . Accoringto the management the removal of the workman from service does not come under retrenchment and as such compliance of the provisions laid down under Section 25F of the Act i.e , giving one month's notice, or making payment of one month notice pay or compensation was not required from the management . Section 2 ( oo ) of the Act defines retrenchment ' as follows:-

management that the management knowingly and deliberately did not produce the Payment Register and Payment Vouchers because the same supported the contention of the workman that he worked continuously from 31-12-2002 to 30-4-2005 meaning thereby that the workmanput in continuous service of 240 days in the year 2003 and also in the year 2004 , the year before the termination of his services by the management . The workman claimed to have worked 339 days in 2003, 338 days in the year 2004 and 115 days in 2005 till his services were terminated . Thus there remains no doubt that the workmanput in continuous service under the management as defined under Section 25B of the Act .

' retrenchment ' means the termination by the employer ofthe service of a workman for any reason whatsoever , otherwise than as a punishment inflicted bywayofdesciplinary action but does not include- 8. The definition of ' workman ' as laid down under Section 2(s) of the Act reads as follows :----

(a) voluntary retirement of the workman; or

(b) retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or

(bb) termination the service of the workman as a result of the non- renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein; or

'Workman' means any person ( including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical , operational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment express or implied, and for the purpose of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute , includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection with or as a consequence of, that dispute , or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person--

(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act , 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) , or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) ; or

(ii) who is employed on the Police Service or as an Officer or other employee of a prison; or

(iii) who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity; or

(iv) who, being employed in a supervisory capacity , draws wages exceeding one thousand six hundred ruppes per mensem or exercise , either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him , functions mainly of a managerial nature . "

Under the circumstance there is no doubt that Surendra Kumar was a workman as defined in the abovenoted provision of the Act. He put in continuous service as defined under Section 25B of the Act under the management ofP & T Department .

10. The management has cited as many as 7 ( seven) decisions on this point including the decisions of our own Hon'ble High Court in the case of Sanjay Kumar Tiwary & Others Vs. the State of Bihar and others reported in B.B.C.J.- 2008-460 . The decision in the case of Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Bhola Singh reported in AIR 2005 Supreme Court- 1790has been cited on behalf of the management in para 18 ofwhich it has been observed that , ' when a workman is appointed in terms of a Scheme on daily wages he cannot derive any legal right to be regularised in service ' . It is now well settled that completion of 240 days continuous service in a year may not by itself be a ground for directing regularisation particularly in a case when the workman had notbeen appointed in accordance with the extant rules . As regards this decision I find that it relates to a person / workman employed in terms of a Scheme . In the present case the workman was not employed in any Scheme nor the reference speaks for regularization of the services of the workman. Hence this ruling does not apply in this case . Likewise the decisions in the case of M. P. Electricity BoardVs. Hari Ram reported in AIR 2004 Supreme Court- 4791 and in the case ofExecutive Engineer , Z. P. Engineering Division and Others Vs. Digmbara Rao reported in AIR 2004 AC 4839 relate to Project workers employed against some Scheme and as such the facts of those decisions do not apply in the instant case . Another decision cited on 9. There is no dispute on the point that the workman was removed from the services on 1-5-2005 . There is also no dispute on the point that no Notice , Notice Pay or Compensation according to Section 25F of the Act was given to the workman by the management. According to the management the workman being daily wager Coollie wasneither employed by the management nor the occasion [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1153 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 7, 2009/फाल्गुन16, 1930

12. Section 25F of the Act reads as follows:

"No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employeruntil;

(a) the workman has been given one month's notice inwriting indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period ofnotice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice;

(b) the workman has been paid , at the time of retrenchment , compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days ' average pay ( for every completed year of continuous service) or any part thereof in excess of six months ; and

(c) notice in the prescibed manner is served on the appropriate Government ( for such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Officeial Gazette. )

behalfofthe management is M/s Essn Dinki Vs. Rajiv Kumar (AIR2003 Supreme Court -38) . In that case the services ofa workman terminated due to non-satisfactory work and in evidence stage it was admitted by the workman that he did not put in continuous service of 240 days . Hence the said ruling does not tally with the facts of the case and as such do not apply in the present case . Another decision cited on behalf of the management is AIR 2005-1729 (Manager RBI Banalore Vs. Mani & Others to show In law 240 days continuous service by itself does not give rise to claim of permanence . Section 25F provides for grant of compensation if a workman is sought to be retrenched in violation of the condition referred to therein . This decision does not apply in the instant case because the instant case is not for permanence of the workman nor the reference is for making the workman permanent or regular. The management has cited the decision in Regional Manager SBI Vs. Rakesh Kumar Tiwary (PLJR-2006( i)-436) . The said ruling is concerning Sec . 25G and 25H of the Act which relates to' last come first go ' and Retrenched workman to be given preference in employment to other persons and thus does in no way help the management .

Under the circumstances I find that retrenchment without compliance of the provisions laid down under Section 25F ofthe Act is illegal and unjustified. Point. No. (1) isdecided accordingly.

Point No. (ii) :

13. From the statement of the management witness, Nos. 5 and 6 it appears that every year the mailmen working onsanctioned posts retire. About 30 to 40 mailmen working on sanctioned posts have retired and no appointment on those posts have been made and the work is being taken from the daily wagers 7-8 in number. Section 25H of the Act reads as follows:

"Where any workman are retrenched, and the employer propses to take into his employ any persons , he shall , in such manner as may be prescribed, give an opportunity (to the retrenched workmenwho are citizens of India to offer themselves for re-employment, and such retrenched workmen) who offer themselves for re- employment shall have preference over other persons .

11. In citing the decision BBCJ -2008-460 (Sanjay Kumar Tiwary & others Vs. the State of Bihar & others the management intended to show that a casual worker on dailywage basis is covered by clause (bb) of section 2(00) of' the Act' and termination of employment of such person doesnot attract the provisions of Section 25F of the ' Act' . The termination of a casual worker on daily wage does not give rise to industrial dispute . The employer terminating the employment of such worker is not required to serve notice or paynotice pay or compensation etc. In this regard I would like to mention that Sub- Section (bb) of Section 2(oo) of the Act purports to exclude from the ambit of the definition of retrenchment ( i) termination of service of a workman as a result of the non- renewal of the contract of employment and (ii ) termination ofcontract of employment in terms of a stipulation contained in the contract of employment in that behalf. The first part relate to termination of service of a workman as a result of non- renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the workman on its expiry and the second part of Sub-Section (bb) refers to such contract being terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein. It also may be noted here that non renewal of contract presupposes an existing contract of employment which is not renewed. Even in respect of a daily wager a contract of employment may exist. In the instant case I do not find that there was any contract between the parties or any stipulation therein between the employer and the workman. In that way I find that the facts of the instant case differs from the facts of the abovenamed case cited on behalf of the management. Under the circumstances discussed above I find that the employer in this case by terminating the services of the workman has retrenched him.

It can not denied that the nature of work of mailman inP & T Department, R. M. S. , Division, Patna is permanent and essential . When the sanctioned posts are vacant and the work is being taken from the daily wagers; not one or two rather 7 or 8 in numbers there is no justification in throwing the workman out ofemployment and not engaging him on work. Under the circumstances and keeping in view the decision reported in PLJR -2006(i) S. C.436 (cited on behalf of the management) . I find and hold that the action of the management in not considering Sri Surendra Kumar for re-employment while engaging fresh hands [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 7,2009/PHALGUNA 16, 1930

1154.

Point No. (iv):

after 1-5-2005 is illegal and unjustified . This point is decided accordingly.

Point No. (iii ) :

15. Keeping in view the discussions made above and the findings arrived at on different point I hold that the workman deserves to be reinstated with full back wages . Thispoint is decided accordingly .

16. Under the circumstances discussed above I find and hold that the action of the management of P & T. , Department, R. M. S. Sub - Division , Patna in terminating the services of Sri Surendra Kumar w.e.f. 1-5-2005 and in not considering him for re- employment while engaging fresh hands after 1-5-2005 is illegal and unjustified. The workman deserves to be reinstated with full back wages calculated @ the wages last paid . The management is directed to comply the same within two months from the date ofpublication of the Award.

17.And that is my Award.

VASUDEO RAM, Presiding Officer 14.According to the management the workman being daily wager can not claim the benefits of section 25F of 'the Act' . The claim of the workman , according to the management is illegal and as such the reference is not maintainable. I have already discussed and held above that the workman was employed on daily wages and as such he worked under the management as mailman from 31-12-2002 to 30-4-2005 putting in continuous service in the years 2004 and 2003. He was retrenched from the service without making compliance of Sec.25F of the Act, which is wholly illegal . The dispute raised by the workman is an industrial dispute. Under the circumstances I find that this reference case is maintainable . Point No. ( iii ) is decided accordingly.

Printed by the Manager , Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .